HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-08-31 Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
August 31, 2009
1:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting
takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to
Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more
information or clarification before proceeding to Council.
Note: If required, there will be a 15 -minute break at 3:00 p.m.
Chair: Acting Mayor
1. DELEGAT/ONS/STAFFPRESENTAT/ONS- (10 minutes each)
1:00 p.m.
2. PUBL/C WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERV/CES
Note: Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications may be permitted
to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes.
Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council
Agenda:
1101 RZ/094/08, 22313 124 Avenue, RS -1b to RT -1
Staff report dated July 31, 2009 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6678-2009 to permit the development of a duplex be
given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
Committee of the Whole Agenda
August 25, 2009
Page 2 of 5
1102 RZ/041/09, 12905 and 12930 246 Street, RS -3 to RS -2
Staff report dated August 18, 2009 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6683-2009 to permit the subdivision of four suburban
residential single family lots be given first reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing.
1103 RZ/047/09, 22207 Brown Avenue, RT -1 and RS -1 to RM -2
Staff report dated August 13, 2009 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6681-2009 to permit construction of a supportive
housing proposal with 46 units in a 4 -storey wooden framed structure be
given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
1104 RZ/096/06, 11774 and 11756 236 Street, First Extension
Staff report dated August 6, 2009 recommending that a one year extension
be granted for rezoning application RZ/096/06 to permit development of 11
single family lots and 1 duplex lot.
1105 DVP/087/07, 23940 118 Avenue
Staff report dated August 13, 2009 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal DVP/087/07 to vary the requirement to
convert to underground wiring fronting the proposed R-1 zone and for
retention of the Telus plant across the frontage of the property on 118
Avenue.
1106 DP/DVP/023/09, 11900 Haney Place
Staff report dated August 19, 2009 provided for information and
recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal
DVP/023/09 to reduce minimum required heights of a commercial building
under the C-3 zone and further that the Corporate Officer be authorized to
sign and seal DP/040/06 to permit construction of a 2 storey commercial
building intended for use as a financial institution.
1107 DP/DVP/049/09, 11224 236 Street
Staff report dated August 19, 2009 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal DVP/049/09 to reduce minimum required lot
depth in the R-3 zone and further that the Corporate Officer be authorized to
sign and seal DP/049/09 in support of a 29 lot subdivision.
Committee of the Whole Agenda
August 25, 2009
Page 3 of 5
1108 Award of Contract, Management of Bus Benches 2009-2014
Staff report dated August 10, 2009 recommending that Contract E02-036-
008 - Management of Bus Benches 2009-2014, be awarded to Key -Bench
Advertising Ltd. and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and
execute the contract.
1109 Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 136/09, 20252 Patterson
Avenue
Staff report dated August 21, 2009 recommending that Latecomer Charges
be imposed and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal
Latecomer Agreement LC 136/09.
1110 Terry Fox Run, Use of Streets
Staff report dated August 7, 2009 recommending that the use of municipal
streets be authorized for the Terry Fox Run on Sunday, September 13, 2009.
1111 St. Patrick's School Walk-a-thon
Staff report dated August 7, 2009 recommending that use of municipal
streets be authorized for the St. Patrick's School Walk-a-thon on Friday,
October 9, 2009.
3. FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERV/CES (including Fire and Police)
1131 Adjustments to 2009 Collector's Roll
Staff report dated August 12, 2009 submitting information on changes to the
2009 Collector's Roll through the issuance of Supplementary/PAAB Roll 05.
1132 Fee for Service Agreement - Tourism Maple Ridge -Pitt Meadows
Staff report dated August 19, 2009 recommending that the 2009 Tourism
Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Fee for Service Agreement be extended to the
end of December 2009 and that the Corporate Officer to authorized to
execute the agreement.
Committee of the Whole Agenda
August 25, 2009
Page 4 of 5
4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERV/CES
1151
5. CORRESPONDENCE
1171
6. OTHER ISSUES
1181
7. ADJOURNMENT
Committee of the Whole Agenda
August 25, 2009
Page 5 of 5
8. COMMUNITY FORUM
COMMUNITY FORUM
The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to ask questions of
Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing
by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the
podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the
individual members of Council. The total time for this Forum is limited to 15
minutes.
If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a
response will be given.
Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings and
delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or
via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings.
Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future
of this community.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca
Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca
Checked by:
Date:
410
MAPLE RIDGE
e ritish CoLumbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: July 31, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/094/08
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6678-2009
22313 124 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS -1b (One Family Urban
Residential) to RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential), to permit the development of a duplex.
This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6678-2009 be given first reading and be forwarded to
Public Hearing; and
2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading.
Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and
receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement;
ii. Removal of the existing building/s;
iii. A Restrictive Covenant for the duplex design and landscaping must be registered
at the Land Title Office;
iv. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising
whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is
evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided
in accordance with the regulations.
v, Pursuant to the Contaminated Site Regulations of the Environmental Management
Act, the subdivider will provide a Site Profile for the subject land.
1101
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Existing:
Proposed:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses
North: Use:
Zone:
South:
East:
West:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
Bob Shadbakht
Ayoughi Holdings Ltd. (Dr. Shandad Ayoughi)
Lot 3, Except Part Dedicated Road on Plan
LMP6917, District Lot 400, Group 1, NWD Plan
75000
Urban Residential
Urban Residential
RS -1b (One Family Urban (medium density)
Residential)
RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential)
Residential
RS -1b (One Family Urban (medium density)
Residential) and RS -3 (One Family Rural
Residential)
Urban Residential
Residential
RM -1 (Townhouse Residential), RM -4 (Multiple
Family Residential District), and RM -5 (Low Density
Apartment Residential)
Urban Residential
Residential
RS -1b (One Family Urban (medium density)
Residential) and RS -1 (One Family Urban
Residential)
Urban Residential
Residential
RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Urban Residential
Single Family Dwelling
Duplex
918 m2
124 Avenue and 223 Street
Full Urban
N/A
-2-
b) Project Description:
A single family dwelling currently exists at 22313 124 Ave. An application has been submitted to
rezone the property from RS -1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) to RT -1 (Two
Family Urban Residential) to permit the development of a two-story duplex.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP). The property is
designated as Urban Residential (Major Corridor), as it has frontage on 124 Ave., which is a major
road corridor between 216th St. and 224th St. Characteristics of Major Corridor Residential
development include ground -oriented housing forms, such as duplexes, subject to compliance with
Major Corridor Residential Infill policies.
The duplex design is compatible with the existing pattern of development in the area and the
building massing and type of dwelling units in the surrounding residential properties. The
proposed two-story duplex is surrounded by one or two-storey single family dwellings to the north,
east, and west; and by one or two-story multi -family units to the south.
The proposed duplex will have one access driveway off 124 Ave. and one access driveway off 223
St., which is not expected to adversely impact the parking and traffic on the existing
neighbourhood.
Zoning Bylaw:
The proposed RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential Infill) zone is compatible with the Urban
Residential (Major Corridor) OCP designation. A preliminary review of the plans in relation to the
Zoning Bylaw requirements for the RT -1 zone has revealed that the proposal complies with the
bylaw. Landscaping and servicing requirements would also need to be met.
Development Permits:
A Development Permit is not required for this rezoning as the duplex is considered a single
detached dwelling unit, which is exempt from the Development Permit Areas. However, a Section
219 Restrictive Covenant will be required to regulate the form, character and internal
arrangements of the duplex to ensure the structure remains two, rather than four, units. The RT -1
(Two Family Urban Residential) zone does not permit duplexes to have secondary suites.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
A Rezoning Servicing Agreement and servicing estimate will be prepared once an acceptable
offsite servicing design has been provided by the developer's engineer. Road dedication is not
-3-
required; however, the developer will be required to construct the required road improvements
within the existing road allowance.
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the rezoning is completed they
will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that
there will be an additional 2 trees which is based on one tree per lot frontage; final street tree and
servicing design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised
that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements
by $50.00.
Fire Department:
Once the existing house is un -occupied, it is to remain secure at all times, even during the
demolition phase. A contact name and number is to be provided to the Fire Department once the
house is vacant.
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that first reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6678-
2009 and that application RZ/094/08 be forwarded to Public Hearing.
Prepared by: Michelle Bast, AScT
Planning Technician
Approved y: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng---j
' GM: Public Works & dovelo'pment Services
-
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
MB/dp
-4-
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6678-2009
Appendix C - Site Plan
Appendix D - Building Elevation Plans
Appendix E - Landscape Plans
-5-
13
12486
12497
14
12478
15
12470
°- 34
12487
16
12462
39
12471
17
12454
18
12446
0_
40
12461
19
12438
0 33
O
12451
20
12430
12422
12414
22
LL
32
12441
12429
3
23
12404
.4m.A
6005)
10406
LMP 12101
1
N
N
2
12417
.O
1 N
r
N
N
2N
rn
cD
co
N
N
124 AVE.
N 9
CO
P 206
44
rn
36
(Y)
12478
14
12477
A ami
12466
B 0
12460
13
12461
L.°
*PP126
o 12
12457
5
12450
11
445
SUBJECT PROPERTY
1 1 Q FU
124
1242
r P 7s
Rem 3
12433
co
M
N
C1L
000
2
n
C7
N
N
12421
COLEMORE ST.
Appendix A
22
12472
12462
21 o P 74108
20
12450
IZ I 1
19
12438
18
12430
17
12422
LMS 631
1n
10
C7
N
N
m
3 0.
12370
4
12360
5
12350
0
0
6
12340
0
CO
N
N
N
CO
O
co
N
N
Rem 4
Rem 3
P 19826
P 8914
B
P 1�
2
P 8914
SCALE 1:1,500
22313 124 AVENUE
MAPLE RIDGE
British Colt mbia
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Oct 23, 2008 FILE: RZ/094/08 BY: PC
Appendix B
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6678-2009
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6678-2009."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 3 Except: Part Dedicated Road On Plan LMP 6917: District Lot 400 Group 1 Plan
75000 New Westminster District.
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1457 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RT -1 (Two Family Urban
Residential)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 .
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
7152:14
[12530
12533
72577
70423-1
*PP120
187
72537
13
0_
5
6
13
72527
a
o
•62
1
12520
6
12525
72570
12509
2
N
fl
d f
186 1
) 1
N
14 n
12572 0
7
P 70522
2 3
4
5
7251.
72573
t ry
1
35
70376
!! 72515
N
N
72502 r
15 a
EP 30750
72518
8
12571
v ^�
N
^�
N
12507
w
1 rEP 70737
72504 P 707
RW 65977 �/ 2 72505
24
54 -+ t
(0
n f P 71514
u, 11 12495
,
P 7 T 141
72494 12
c) 35
,N ��
125 AVE.
P 20644
ri
72501
1 1
o
4
N
r� 10
13
0 72497
N 9
H
■x498 24 psi 4
I �7 297
0
I
72487
12486
N
15
N
^ ^
/ n
3
6576E
r
19
14 I
rZ 34
P 20+44
N
23 Oq'/ w124as
a
/ 12479
72478
72467
12484 \ 3
6
14
`
1 ti
!I in
w
32
8
15
12470
39
36
72477
22 1 7 493
W-
12477
n
223 ST.
r0
72472 i
7 a
16
O 72477
724781
13
W 77
812
1
f 72455
12462
r9
72467
21 P 741 8
7124G5�4'+
1245
1245
a 40
.d
iC.LIZ7
*PP12:
N
12462
6
72455
17
12454
72467
N
12457
0. 1
672455
o
30
)
12460
d
20 LMS 631
5
18I
o
12450
`�`1
72447
12446
° 33
COLE
512x45
�`4
79
4
1 9
0 72487
•
5 a
11
CO
19 4
W
72445
12439
12438
-NI
12450
72445
1.9, 12435
72438 co r
5
1153
3
20
32
4 N
10
N... 0..
a 372425
��
72431
12430
12441
72444 0_
72433
1 8 �'��
2
1I
n�� 2
21 -
72429
P 20644
J i
72430 ig
12415
w
`0_ 12423
72422
3
j
15 1
f A g
22 a
12414
LMP
12101
P
Rem
000
72a21 7 n
7
72405
41 08
//
/1 P
p72471
1 B
6h{}74 ry
23
\12404
m
1 N
72477
NLo
NN
2
15
^P
^ 3
N
4 "h'
'
z4e1
N
LMP 6728 LMP 12 LMP
LMP 17058 LMP 18470
1
EP '74109
124 AVE. LMP 6711
17357 / / LMP 19806 LMP 6738 LMP 8710
4 22186
Ler
T2710
RP 2704•
22206
N N
1 N
2N
co
I N ` "a•
T — T �/ `
`
Ni
Rem
N
Rem 4
N
Rem 3
N R e m 1
7239!
P 1
2
1
(NI5
P 19826
2
Rem. A3
oo
I
12385
12370
111
ill
P 8914
F
I
(P 26005)
4
I
I '
g
1238q
K110406
12360 c`4_
�—_L___- "
5 coo
-}— — —1(
1
r�
/
/
0.624 ha.
12367
F
72350
1 o
P 1 4730
72347
72344
�BLF' i�s'L�
a.
6
P/
I4-
2
112145
ISI
_
12340
I n.
1
O�
�t�r-
a
7
&I
I� i�l
P 8914
S 1/2 C
72.233
cn
U
12330
mll N
±--
v
N
121
21
12119
0
c]
8
12320
-
+ — — ---t.._'----�
_\)
1
J
Rem 1
42
12325
N
co 20
,- 72318
9)
12312
1
LMP 4403
+r
P 80319
f 41 225
43
12505
11
I-
niie/r 7"I6
I
VADLI RIDGE ZO\- Av
Bylaw No. 6678-2009
Map No. 1457
From: RS -1 b(One Family Urban(medium
To: RT -1 (Two Family Urban
-\DI\G
density)Residential)
Residential)
1:2500
MAPLE RIDGE
L. British Columbia
8Z98 -Z176 003 id IS gar,
s'.1011MONMI N2CI1V
yi7 sitY i.sao auto
.;iiirea,;oct -
3
Append c
a
3/10.3103
ak,E•og
044,4
A
8Z98-Zti6 7000 id ;LS Hf1 11-
SNOILVAON3 1 SNOISaa WOSS:
p17 suBasaQr aucox
}
/ppe d ix .D
a
3
8Z98 -Z176 '000 Id LS af10111i LBZZ-8£#
sMOLLVAOHaa'sNOcsaa WOssn3
p17 suffyaa, aucojt uoiv�
MN
63
111 h
It �_'.Ls
a1_
•
1
Finir
Eng
ISM.
Hill
a'/
VI 9'b
63
111 h
It �_'.Ls
a1_
•
1
Finir
Eng
ISM.
Hill
a'/
VI 9'b
etso
ODnICPETE
IURW
Six
eaagfi,
-
7DD
A/g
DSA
SUITABLE FENCE DESIGN
FENCES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF TREATED CEDAR MATERIAL
AND ALL PARTS OF A FENCE VISIBLE FROM A STREET SHALL BE
FINISHED IN A NATURAL, SEMI -TRANSPARENT STAIN.
FENCE HEIGHT AND LOCATION SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH
MAPLE RIDGEBYLAWS.
7
hLD
b•+'
Appendix E
MAPLE RIDGE
British COIL mni a
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE:
FILE NO:
ATTN:
First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6683-2009
12905 and 12930 246 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
August 18, 2009
RZ/041/09
C of W
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS -3 (Rural Residential) to RS -
2 (Suburban Residential), to permit the subdivision of four suburban residential single family lots.
This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6683-2009 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing; and
2. That the following term(s) and condition(s) be met prior to final reading.
Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt
of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement;
Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the
suitability of the site for the proposed development;
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
Ed Brett
Richard W And Susan B Thompson
Gregory H And Audrey A Cockrill
Lot: 1, Section: 27, Township: 12, Plan: BCP38687;
PID: 027-696-154
Lot: 4, Section: 27, Township: 12, Plan: BCP38687;
PID: 027-696-189
1102
OCP:
Existing:
Proposed:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses:
Suburban Residential
Suburban Residential
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Suburban Residential
South: Use: Single Family Residential & Alouette road
Zone: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS -2
(Estate Suburban Residential)
Designation: Suburban Residential and road
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Suburban Residential
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Suburban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: One Family Suburban Residential
Site Area: 0.802 Hectares (3.96 acers)
Access: 246th Street (off Alouette Road)
Servicing: community water and individual septic fields
Companion Applications: SD/041/09 and SD/042/09
b) Project Description:
The applicant requests to rezone the subject properties on either side of newly constructed 246th
Street (Appendix A), from RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS -2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) to permit subdivision into 4 parcels not less than 4000m2 (1 acre) in area. An earlier
application (RZ/014/06) that requested a rezoning from RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS -2
(One Family Suburban Residential) to allow for a six lot subdivision and dedication of the Alouette
River frontage was defeated by Council at second and third reading on January 9, 2007. As a result,
the applicants proceeded with an interim subdivision of two lots each under the existing RS -3 (One
Family Rural Residential) zone.
The eastern portion of the land has been cleared with the earlier application and the remaining
western portion will be cleared with this process. Arborists reports have been submitted by Mike
-2
Fadum & Associates Ltd.dated September 22, 2008 & July 23, 2009 addressing tree -assessment
issues.
Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd. have submitted a report dated July 11, 2008
concluding that the site is suitable for four lots. An addendum to this report dated August 8, 2009
was submitted stating suitablity of the current subdivision. A professional engineer has completed
the field investigation for septic fields, which is satisfactory for the four lots . The two subject
properties were recently created through a subdivision application SD/014/06. The subdivision
servicing included: upgrading of Alouette road; construction of 246th Street with watermain and
drainage utilities and installation of a fire hydrant at the cul-de-sac on 246th Street
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
This neighborhood is currently designated Suburban Residential in the Official Community Plan. The
proposed RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone correlates with this designation and much of
the land on the east side of Alouette Road.
Zoning Bylaw:
The proposed subdivision complies with the minimum lot width, depth and area requirements
prescribed for RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential) lots as specified by the zoning bylaw.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department concluded that there are no servicing deficiencies as all the municipal
services were constructed by the parent subdivision SD/014/06. The proposed lots will be served by
the municipal water system and have on-site sewage disposal systems. The proposed sewage
systems must be registered with the Fraser Health Authority, including a confirmation from the
professional engineer that the on-site works did not disturb the soil at the proposed septic field
sewage disposal areas and that the soil is still suitable for sewage disposal fields. Any other
servicing issues will be dealt with through the accompanying subdivision applications stated above.
Building Department:
• Percolation tests required prior to the issuance of the PLA. Health Authority approval in
writing required from the Health Authority for the installation of a septic sewage disposal
system. A Restrictive Covenant for the septic field locations to be registered for each lot.
• A letter of assurance or an addendum to this original report with confirmation of subsurface
conditions, either through test pits, core samples, to a minimum depth of 4.Om and
suitability for the new subdivision will be required.
• Details of type of infiltration system used for storm water management will be required. If a
system is required, a Restrictive Covenant will need to be placed on each lot.
-3-
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed
they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated
that there will be an additional 4 trees which is based on one tree per lot; final subdivision design
will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the
maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget by $100. 00.
Fire Department:
The Fire Department has no concerns with the proposal.
CONCLUSION:
As the proposed development complies with the Official Community Plan and Zoning Bylaw, it is
recommended that this application be favourably considered and be given first reading and
forwarded to Public Hearing.
Prepared by: Rasika Ac
Planner II
arya, B -Arch, M -Tech, UD (SFU)
e-
1 Approved by: J e Pickering, MCP, MCIP
Director of Planning
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Develojment Services
Concurrence: J. L. (J" ) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
/ /
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6683-2009
Appendix C - Proposed Subdivision & Schematic Servicing Plan
-4-
A
P
ix A
N
SCALE 1:2,500
City of Pitt ,_,
Meadows 1
• r�
ie,i 0.119P117it4
.'
I'! nL ill.
Rim ,: O=
.difp� .1
12905 & 12930 246 STREET
District of
Langley
MAPLE RIDGE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Jun 10, 2009 FILE: RZ/041/09 BY: PC
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6683-2009
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6683-2009."
2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 Section 27 Township 12 Plan BCP38687 New Westminster District.
And Lot 4 Section 27 Township 12 Plan BCP38687 New Westminster District.
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1459 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is/are hereby rezoned to RS -2 (One Family Suburban
Residential)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 .
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
ippe xa
P 2510
18
1.947 ha.
±3.440 ha
'3s
10
/ 3
/ 1.09 ha
2.023 ha.
O
P 2510
.. 7
•
15
0.400
1.541 ha.
v
ADL
14
2.023 no.
Bylaw No.
Map No.
From:
To:
RIDG
ZON
AV
0
CL
\DING
P 2510
4
1.583 ho.
6683-2009
1 459
RS-3(One Family Rural residential)
RS-2(One Family Suburban Residential)
20
3.52 ha
LMP 4211
1:2500
iX G
w
t
PLAN
3041
2
PLAN BCP 38687
w
4
3
PLAN BCP 38687
4-
a.. 37'
-
37' 31' 31"
/2.720.'t*
TOP
OF BANK
24.291
v
9'
'5
w
o ,
<0
Z 0
DU1
Z T*T
-
soDcn
Nmv
(nD�
0
TI
P
o
4.46
0
O . X
PTS
Z
f3Z —I
P1TTI
D p
O
O
N
PROPOSED LOT 1
0.406 ho
14.46 -
—
O
1 _78_22L
PROPOSED LOT 1
0.403 ho
7.50
T
`• 7.50
PROPOSED LOT 2
0.400 ho
o
N
0
—�---- 9.66
_
2.
70.461 47,
4'41'44..
PROPOSED LOT 2
0.400 ha
ALOUETTE
ROAD
PRESENT ZONING: RS -3
PROPOSED ZONING: RS -2
REZONING APPLICATION
LOT 1 & LOT 4, PLAN BCP38687
CMC ADDRESS: 12905/12930 246TH STREET, MAPLE RIDGE
CLIENT G. COCKREL/ R. THOMP30N
ggebrarirlK 4w.ior fY. .108 110. 0&-03 N.DDEITE RCAD DATE 11 /MA'/08
'.n' SCALE 14 IMOD V - SHEET 1 OF 1
App
et,dix c
PLAN 38687
I ! (-147.30
4
DC. STORM SOME
PROP. 1MAIER SEWAGE
PROP. ,CULMT CROSSING
EX STORM SERIACE
E]L WATER EERNCE.
EX CULVERT CRMIG
DC. TCPOGRAP14010
LOT GRADING REQUIRED
SCHEMATIC SERVICING PLAN
LOT 1 & LOT 4, BCP 38687
12905/12930 248TH STREET, MAPLE RIDGE
gab, failwastfies saviess
CLEW G. COCKRILL/ R. THOMPSON
J08 NO. 08-03 ALOUETTE ROAD
DATE 11/MAY/09
SCALE H 1:500 V -
SHEET 1 OF 1
4
MAPLE RIDGE
BrHIsh Coiumhia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: August 13, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/047/09
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6681-2009
22207 Brown Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RT -1 (Two Family Urban
Residential) and RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment
Residential), to permit a future construction of a "Supportive Housing" proposal with 46 units (45
studio units plus 1 caretaker suite) in a 4 -storey wooden framed structure. This application is in
compliance with the Official Community Plan and the Town Centre Area Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6681-2009 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing; and
2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading.
i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation;
ii. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt
of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement;
iii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the
suitability of the site for the proposed development;
iv. A landscape plan prepared by a Landscape Architect must be submitted including the
security to do the works;
v. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking.
vi. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant restricting the land & structure for "Supportive
Housing" use.
vii. Registration of a statutory right-of-way agreement on the lands to the east (22225
Brown Avenue), Lot: 1, D.L.: 399, Plan: LMP27702; PID: 023-379-278, for access to
the four at grade parking stalls.
1103
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Existing:
Proposed:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use:
Zone:
Designation:
South: Use:
Zone:
Designation:
East: Use:
Zone:
Designation:
West: Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Access:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
Anthony Milkovich
District Of Maple Ridge
Lot: 1, D.L.: 399, Plan: LMP12218; PID: 018-066-496
Medium/High Density Residential
Medium/High Density Residential
RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential), RS -1 (One Family Urban
Residential)
RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
Multi -family
RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Low-rise Apartment
Commercial
RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) and C-3 (Town
Centre Commercial)
Commercial
School District 42 office
P-6 (Civic Institutional) and RM -3 (High density
Apartment)
Institutional
Single family dwellings
RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Park
Vacant
Supportive Housing low-rise apartment building
Vehicular: 222nd Street; Pedestrian: Brown Avenue
Full Urban
DP/047/09 and VP/047/09
b) Proposed Use and Project Description:
The proposal is an initiative to reduce homelessness and provide secure and affordable social
housing for the homeless and those most in need in the District. Priority will be given to low-income
singles, those with stabilized mental and physical disabilities and addictions, requiring transitional
-2
housing and tenants requiring a long-term (18 to 24 months) affordable housing with minimal level
of on-site support services. Various non-profit service providers will be supporting the various
tenants. Only persons referred by and supported by the service provider will be eligible to move into
a supportive housing unit. Tenants will develop an individualized support plan upon entry and staff
will work with them to help attain their goals. Society staff will provide group and individual support,
training and education regarding a range of issues, including: household management; budget
management; employment and money issues; community living skills; organized recreational and
social events. There will be a minimum of one trained resident support staff on duty (on-site) at all
times (24 hours a day, 7 days a week). In addition, there will be a resident caretaker to manage the
upkeep of the building.
The subject site is triangular in shape, located within the north precinct of the Town Centre Area on
the corner of Brown Avenue and 222nd Street but just outside the Central Business District. The
project is a partnership between the District (land -owners), BC Housing (project -funding) and
Alouette Home Start Society (operators). Alouette Home Start Society and its service providers will
work collaboratively with BC Housing to develop and define the building and operational programs.
The proposal is for 46 units in a 4 -storey wooden framed structure with 13 under -ground parking
stalls and 4 at grade parking stalls (Appendix C). The proposed gross floor area of the building is
2,565 m2 with each self-contained unit of 37 m2 (400 ft2). Due to the proposed use "Supportive
Housing" a single secured entry is preferred and no balconies have been proposed to individual
units. However, an effort is seen to compensate the absence of balconies with bay windows,
horizontal sunshades and a semi -private amenity garden (open space) proposed at the eastern
portion of the site controlled by swing gates to allow enclosure & safety. Proposed main pedestrian
access to the building is from Brown Avenue. Vehicular access to the underground parkade is from
222nd Street via a security gate. A secondary vehicular access is from the School District office
driveway on the east to access four visitor parking at -grade stalls. Vertical brick cladding and a
canopy mark the pedestrian access on the south (Brown Avenue). Other materials proposed include
painted cement board siding, cement board panel and composite panel siding (Appendix D).
The applicant has submitted a shadow study that shows any impact on adjacent properties and a
Geotechnical Report dated March 06, 2009 done by GeoPacific Consultants Ltd. Other reports
submitted include: An Arborist report by Diamond Head Consulting Ltd. dated April 21, 2009; A
stage -1 Environmental Site Assessment report by A.C.M. Environmental Corporation dated June 29,
2009 and a Geotechnical Investigation report by GeoPacific Consultants Ltd. dated March 06, 2009
confirming that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical perspective.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
Policy 3-34 of the Official Community Plan states "Maple Ridge supports the provision of affordable,
rental and special needs housing throughout the District. Where appropriate, the provision of
affordable, rental and special needs housing will be a component of area plans". The Town Centre
Area Plan, through its several principles and objectives, encourages a variety of housing that serves
many needs.
-3-
Policy 3-30 of the Official Community Plan states "Maple Ridge will encourage partnerships with
government and non-government agencies to support the creation of affordable, rental and special
needs housing in the community". This proposal is a partnership between the municipality as the
land -owners, BC Housing as the project -funding body and Alouette Home Start Society as the
operating body. A Memorandum of Understanding has been approved by "all parties" for the
development and operation of this facility. The District as owner of the subject site will lease the site
to the Alouette Home Start Society for 50 years with two - 10 year options for renewal. Alouette
Home Start Society will lease, maintain and repair the building, pay utilities, insurance, fees and
applicable taxes. BC Housing is funding the project as part of the Provincial Homelessness Initiative
Program and is committed to make this proposal a "LEED-Gold building".
The subject site designated "Low-rise Apartment" as per the Town Centre Area Plan, is surrounded
by single family houses to the west on lands designated park as per the OCP; the School District 42
office on the east; single family and commercial uses on the south on lands designated commercial
as per the OCP and multi-family/apartment use on the north. The proposed 4 -storey structure
complies with the "Low -Rise Apartment" town centre designation which permits 3 to 5 storey
residential structures.
Zoning Bylaw:
The proposed RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) is intended for low to medium density
apartment use and permits a maximum floor space ratio of 1.8 times the net lot area. Proposed
floor space ratio is 1.12. The usable open space required in this zone is 341.99 m2 and proposed
usable open space is 755 m2. The required common activity area of 65 m2 is divided between an
indoor meeting room and the usable open space.
Variances to the Zoning Bylaw:
The applicant is seeking the following variances for the proposed development:
• A 1.824 meter setback variance along 222nd Street (permitted setback is 7.5 meter &
proposed setback is 5.67 meters);
• A 0.402 meter setback variance on the north (permitted setback is 7.5 meter & proposed
setback is 7.09 meters);
• A 3.356 meter setback variance along Brown Avenue (permitted setback is 7.5 meter &
proposed setback is 4.14 meters);
• A height variance of 1.157 meter (permitted maximum height is 15 meters and 4 storeys;
proposed height is 16.15 meter) which is to house the mechanical penthouse for central
heat -recovery ventilation system.
The above mentioned variances will require approval prior to the Development Permit approval.
-4-
Off -Street Parking & Loading Bylaw:
This proposal is subject to the revised minimum parking standards applicable within the Central
Business District of the Town Centre Area due to the proposed use of "Supportive Housing". The
Town Centre Parking Strategy completed last year revisited parking standards for some uses within
the Town Centre Area and include revised parking standards for residents based on unit sizes for a
multi -family residential use and based on the proposed use. This proposal is subject to the revised
minimum parking standards. As per Section 10 of the Maple Ridge Off -Street Parking and Loading
Bylaw # 4350-1990, a minimum of 0.35 spaces per unit are required for a Supportive Housing use.
Based on the revised parking standard, for a total of 46 units, this project requires a total residential
& visitor parking of 17 spaces. Total proposed parking is 13 spaces in the under -ground parkade
and 4 at grade parking spaces. Long term and short-term bicycle parking is also required. Bicycle
storage lockers have been proposed in the under -ground parkade and the short-term bicycle parking
is provided at grade, closer to the main entrance of the building, in a well -lit area visible to
pedestrians and cyclists.
Development Permits:
The subject site lies within the North View precinct of the Town Centre Area, designated "Low-rise
Apartment". The proposal is subject to the Town Centre Area Development Permit guidelines to
address the form and character of the development and council will review a development permit
report at a later date.
Advisory. Design Panel:
On July 14, 2009, the Advisory Design Panel reviewed the proposal and was supportive of it. The
panel commended the applicant on the quality of ADP package, presentation and choice of material
and recommended the following:
• Landscaping around the concrete pad to be either relocated downstairs or the material type
changed and adding a buffer around the garbage pad.
• Proposed gravel path material from existing stair to be changed and consideration to move it for
tree preservation.
• Improved treatment of the corner to add an urban element like sitting area and maintain
continuity to current landscaping along 222nd and the town centre area. Explore possibility of
connecting the corner to the entry.
• Hedging around the at -grade parking to provide a landscaped buffer.
• Provide additional detail for the raised planters in the outdoor open space.
• BCNTA details (including soil depths, planting spacing, etc) are required to be incorporated on
all landscape drawings prior to DP approval.
• Recommend the possible deletion of the parking stalls to the east property line of the building.
The project architect is working towards addressing these issues which will form a part of the
Development Permit report at a later date.
5-
Development Information Meeting:
On July 28, 2009 the applicant & project architect, landscape architect, BC Housing representatives
and Alouette Home Start Society representatives held the "Public Information Meeting" at the Fraser
Room of the Maple Ridge Public library from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. This meeting was in an open
house format with all the drawings and information displayed and was attended by 16 citizens. Two
newspaper advertisements & mail outs were sent as required. Some highlights of this meeting were:
• Feedback from most participants was positive. There appears to be a great degree of
community understanding of the need for supportive housing in the District and many
people from outside of the mail -out notification area came to the meeting out of interest who
also expressed a need to see more affordable housing.
• Some neighbours expressed concern about property values, however, once they saw the
proposed design and were advised of studies on property values for other similar housing
projects they no longer seemed as concerned.
• Some neighbours expressed concern about losing the green space or neighbourhood open
space. When advised that the subject site is not a designated park and that the OCP
identifies long-term plans to develop a much larger park west of 222nd Street they were no
longer concerned about the proposal.
• 18 comment sheets were returned, mostly positive except for the residents of the strata
complex on the north of subject site who are concerned this is not the right location for the
proposed use.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments:
• Existing roads have been built to urban standard with curb, gutter and sidewalk so no upgrades
are required;
• The sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer locations and size of service connections
required will have to be confirmed by applicant at the Building Permit stage;
• Level of street lighting on 222nd Street is deficient which will require upgrading as part of the
rezoning servicing agreement;
• Street trees will have to be added and form part of the rezoning servicing agreement;
• Existing overhead wires will remain in place and all utility connections to the proposed structure
will have to be underground;
• The applicant will have to ensure that the on-site excavation and construction is done in
accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer;
• All proposed works must comply with what is permitted with the existing STAT right-of-way (BCP
15939) on the eastern edge, for Hydro and Telephone.
• The applicant will need to require written consent from the School District 42, to permit
proposed use of the driveway to access the four at -grade parking stalls. An easement will be
-6-
required from the School District and some work may also need to be done by the utility
companies to relocate the pole anchors that are located in this area. The existing driveway is
designed for one-way traffic and directional arrows are painted on the driveway surface and the
proposed access way would have to go against the flow of traffic.
Fire Department:
The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments:
• The southwest exit from the underground needs to have a paved surface from point of exit to the
sidewalk (plan indicates gravel). Exit pathways must be of a surface that can be kept clear of
snow and ice and have an even surface. Gravel walkways are too hard to keep clear of this;
• The east exit does not appear to have a clear exiting walkway to the sidewalk;
• A fire -hydrant. will have to be installed and a fire safety plan and location of Fire Dept connection
which must be located at the property line;
• A standpipe is required inside by the overhead gate to the underground parkade.
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the development permit is
approved they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is
estimated that there will be an additional 5 trees added which will be finalized at the Development
Permit stage. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement
of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $125.00.
e) School District Comments:
A referral was sent to the School District Office and there was no response.
f) RCMP Comments:
A referral was sent to the RCMP and they have no concerns.
g) Intergovernmental Issues:
Ministry of Transportation:
On July 21, 2009, a referral was sent to the Ministry of Transportation.
Local Government Act:
h) Environmental Implications:
The stage 1 Environmental Site Assessment report by A.C.M. Environmental Corporation dated June
29, 2009 states that no areas of potential environmental concern were found, that would be
-7-
considered to have an environmental impact on site, and therefore no environmental work is
warranted for the subject site.
CONCLUSION:
The proposal is centrally located and an initiative to reduce homelessness and provide secure,
affordable social housing for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness in the District. The
LEED-Gold project design, is a partnership between the District (land -owners), BC Housing (project -
funding) and AHSS-Alouette Home Start Society (operators). Some variances as stated above need
approval at the Development Permit stage which the Council will review at a later date through the
Development Permit report.
1 1 or
Prepared by: Rasika Acha �:, BArch, M Tech, UD (SFU)
Planner 11
Approved by: Jane Pickerig, MCP, MCIP
Director of Planning
.-071t/Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Develppmt Services
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
RA/dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw # 6681-2009
Appendix C - Site Plan
Appendix D - Building Elevation
Appendix E - Landscape drawings
-8-
59
39
21
17
5
1
1
1
5
5
DUNBAR ST.
95
12182
96
12168
97 co
12158 cp
IYVY13.31
P 57090
Pcl."A"
NWS 1357
12151/73
N
98 °-
12138
1 CP 13
99
12120
2
3
100
12112
280
12106
4
5
6
LO
CO
z
12
12147
275
11
N 12139
0 274
12129
10
273
7
8
12123
272
12119
281
12096
103
12086
6997
rn P
N
121 AVE.
0
12111
104
12080
105
12070
CO
N
K
0
N
L
P 16997
M
CO
N
N
12075
106 m
12060 C7
co
0
107
12048
J
N
N
P 169
I
N
97
H
N
N
G
12061
CHURCH AVE.
108
12032
109 m
(p
12026 C9
co
110
c]
N
P 14898
C
E
o).12035
0
DEWDNEY TRUNK RD.
CO
N
C
1
0
N
A
P 3175
N
op
N
51
P 49482
12170
44
P 41066
nfPeo.ct.ix A
48
P 44211
12167
c 2
(h
12159
1
(P 9669)
12128
NWS 133
Rem
G
P 10689
12149
14
12131
N 15
u(
0_
LMP 27702
SUBJECT PROPERTY
(P 3
121195
LMP 12218
1
0
0
CV
12048
A
LMP 8411
1
N
N
N
12127
16
12117
17
12097
18 cv
117
N
c'2
0_
19
12087
12038
4 rn
(.0
w
3
12028
rz
P
2 2
6
9669
0'
N
N
1
P 70168
NWS 2870
N
a
LMP 27701
BROWN AVE.
Rem 8
P 20094
7
P 20094
P 20094
9
P 20094
10
"LMP2967f"nNl
12061
55 53
C7
tr7
a
12051
12002/12
50
E
1/2
E `"'
RP 59105
N r
O1
4J
cc
N P
Rem it
2 RI
N
8978
NWS._3233
N
N
N
N
C912
N
P 32
Cl
11N
)6
City of Pitt
Meadows i y
rT
SCALE 1:2,000
District of
Langley
0
1.0
0
I
ti
��-•
FRASER lq.
22207 BROWN AVENUE
MAPLE RIDGE
Brutish Cn Umbia
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Jun 23, 2009 FILE: RZ/047/09 BY: PC
A x a
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6681-2009
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6681-2009."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 District Lot 399 Group 1 Plan LMP12218 New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1458 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment
Residential)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200 .
APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 .
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
;92
95
NWS 1531
72779
12182
51
44
48
N. 12767
7 �s7/a
P 57090
P 49482
0.708ha
P 41066P
0.453ha
44211
0.453ha
ri g
72770
1216896
Pcl."A"
a-1275'
COCO
Lo 19 0 7S?
12158 97
LLD
NWS 1357
1215117
12170
1
727 L P
Lo
1
N
Cl- I89
c'N
98 a1
CP 13
12147
N 275
1274.9
14
12
E
1 12139
72738
12 2
12139
8394
co a
yc
m
EP 67145
2
p
12142
co 11
3
(7,274
00 Rem
NI
`..
99
1212911�
72720
4 u) 10
273
N G
N 15
'
P 10689
n
12130-
12
100
Z
12721
LL
12112
12123
(P 9669)
°
10
II
272
16
12124
186
6
7
8
9
12728
280
72179
12777
`E 77
1210
L
n
\ ,
17
9 CN
72106 I) n
P
16997
n
NWS 133
LMP 27702
1
281 `°
a Q
P
0
72178r-
,85Ldo
1209713096
I j a
N Cl-
N
N
12117
N
/209718�
S 184
103
EP 30259121
AVE.
0.727 ha
8D
12096
1
12085 w
12085^
(P 38752)
<Z
• m
104
N
N
N
"�'
N
N
N
19
N
7,
I83
k p 159.3
12084
12081 0
72000
if
L
M
N
LMP 27701
`
- `
82
105
P 16997
12075
LMP 12218
N. 1
�$ BROWN AVE.
7207)
72977)
oo
N
Of.,,12061
LMP 8
g l
a 12061
106 c
12060 N
J h
P 16997
H^
G
N
Rem 8
P 20094
tan
55
° 1
N A
LMP 3984
N
a
N
N
N
12061
ul
72052
8020
1204807
CHURCH AVE.
A
N
P 2{]094
a
4
7.
12048 LMP 8411
PLAZA
72057
_
79 —
— —108 —
P 12284
_---
N Fcr
)
4 co
tis l W
P 13752
2
1204.!
12032
7
72038 m
9
00
109 `1O>
P 14898
N
E
oo 12035
M78
3
7
12002/1/
50
17037
co
12026
C co
—
12028
P 20094
47
ZNI
r 12025
co
a_
O-
o) P
9669N
in
0.840hv
�n
a D
oo
N
op 279
Pro
D
Q6 N c0
F 20094
�ry
\
w 7201..
a. 278
110 ``
ii.N
N
2 a.
N w
N
2
N
o, 1
N
h
N
ry.
10 Nt
LMP29876�
4
h
Ery
rrry
cN
nn
�N
^2
N
i
N
N
N
N
N
to
ry
DEWDNEY TRUNK RD.
EP 54063, 4 p �g RP
`:•.1.
N
N
N
w
N
N
o
N
N
N
�,
N
tem 1 22242
IP 11807
h W
i�1/
Iti E
e
i1E \
i /ry
a�
E
N
h .P
59105
Remn
2.i‘n12
8978
4+
ti
h
ry
l'1'.
22326/34
P 42415
7$
N
22342/Ad
50
cn
C
1A
P 3175
P 70168
NWS 2870
P 6225
N
P 3208
0_
NWS 3374
LL w
NWS 3233
N
w z
BCP 22636
71980
*LMP4261
NNJ
r
I
BCS 2391
P 84262
3175
Pcl. 121
1796
1P
7683 8
7
10
P
16
32C
17
0.465ho
c 1 nn
vi
77950
h
h
vADLE RIDG- ZO\- AV-\DI\G
Bylaw No. 6681-2009
Map No. 1458
From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
and RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential)
To: RM-2(Medium Density Apartment Residential)
1:2500
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
91!1111 HE 'I
99 SII
eFf
LN
South Elevation
East Elevation
AFfekthic b
tC
tri
0. 0..0 iaaaaa
v v v v
J00000OOCUO000000 7
North Elevation
West Elevation
- I 4'
L
$.
iii
1 11
c _ Agmh,1
FaICZ r-1 Of L12
%RA2 F j
l 8a
Za ii FSE
A
e 5
0
APr E
E� E
- it...
aai1S ZZZ
MAPLE RIDGE
6riti 511 Col umh,a
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: August 6, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/096/06
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Rezoning - First Extension
11774 and 11756 236 ST
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant for the above noted file has applied for an extension to this rezoning application under
Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. This application is to permit the
development of approximately 11 single family lots under the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential
District) and R-1 (Residential District) zones, and 1 duplex lot under the RT -1 (Two Family Urban
Residential) zone.
RECOMMENDATION:
That a one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/096/06 and that the following
conditions be addressed prior to consideration of final reading:
a. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and
receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement;
b. Amendment to Schedule "B" & "C" of the Official Community Plan;
c. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the
suitability of the site for the proposed development;
d. Road dedication as required;
e. Removal of the existing buildings;
f. A Restrictive Covenant for the duplex design must be registered at the Land Title
Office;
g. Park dedication as required.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
WAYNE BISSKY
HOWARD M KOSAKA
JODY A JOHNSON
1104
Legal Description:
OCP:
Existing:
Proposed:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
Lots 55 and 56, Section 16, Township 12, NWD Plan:
26073
Urban Residential and Conservation
Urban Residential and Conservation
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), R-1
(Residential District), and RT -1 (Two Family Urban
Residential
Single Family Residential
RS -1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential)
Urban Residential and Conservation
Currently: Single Family Residential;
Proposed: Single Family Residential and Park
Currently: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential);
Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential
District)
Urban Residential and Conservation
Single Family Residential
CD -1-93 and RS -lb (One Family Urban (Medium
Density) Residential)
Urban Residential and Conservation
Townhouses
RM -1 (Townhouse Residential)
Urban Residential
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential and Two Family Residential
1.294 HA (3.19 acres)
236 Street and 118 Avenue
Full Urban
SD/096/06
This application is to permit the development of approximately 11 single family Tots under the R-3
(Special Amenity Residential District) and R-1 (Residential District) zones, and 1 duplex lot under the
RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zone.
A requirement of the development process is approval of an Intensive Residential Development
Permit to ensure the form and character of the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zoned
buildings at the Building Permit stage.
The following dates outline Council's consideration of the application and Bylaws 6601-2008 and
6600-2008:
2
The First Reading report (see attached) was considered on August 26, 2008;
First Reading was granted August 26, 2008
Public Hearing was held September 16, 2008;
Second and Third reading was granted on September 30, 2008.
Application Progress:
The project has been delayed due to financial difficulties associated with the recent and on-going
economic downturn. It is anticipated that the applicant will proceed with a two phase subdivision
development of the site. The first phase will be a 2 lot subdivision (one RT -1 zoned lot and one R-1
and R-3 zoned lot). The second phase will be the further subdivision of the R -1/R-3 zoned lot into
approximately 11 lots.
Alternatives:
Council may choose one of the following alternatives:
1. grant the request for extension;
2. deny the request for extension; or
3. repeal third reading of the bylaw and refer the bylaw to Public Hearing.
CONCLUSION:
The applicant has been actively pursuing the completion of this rezoning application and has applied
for a one year extension. It is anticipated that within the next few months final consideration will be
applied for.
P►`epared by: Ann Edwards
Planni T-chnician, CPT
( Approved Y e P - ing, ' P, MCIP
Director of Planning
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
elopment Services
GM: Public Works
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
3
AE/
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - First Reading Report
4
119 AVE.
MS 2415
A
LMS 1818
11757
LMS 1421
11737
0
M
N
61808
11
11880
B ro
co
11870 d
c
8
10
11882
11856 g
9 J
10
LM
9 8
29
11850
28 0
11840 N
N
27
11826
8
0
0
3669
7
6h
2 307
7
11
11899
012
11887
N
13
11881
a
2 14
11873
15
11865
118 A AVE.
16
11853
CO 17
N 11841
26
11818
25
11806
24
LMP
23
127!
22
6
21
N
18
11829
2 19
J 11817
11811
20
11774
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
1756
11858
APPENDIX A
P 1676
P 1676
118 AVE.
r
SCALE 1:2,500
11756 & 11774 236 STREET
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE� MAPLE RIDGE
RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Oct 6, 2006 FILE: RZ/096/06 BY: PC
MAPLE RIDGE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
APPENDIX B
TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 5, 2008
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/096/06
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600-2008 and
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6601-2008
11774 and 11756 236 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to amend the Official Community Plan to increase the designated
Conservation area and to rezone the subject property from RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) to
R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), R-1 (Residential District), and RT -1 (Two Family Urban
Residential). This application is to support a 12 lot subdivision.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600-2008 be given first
reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
2. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and
on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 6600-2008 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to
provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a public hearing on
the bylaw;
3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600-2008 be considered in
conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Pian and Waste Management Plan;
4. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600-
2008 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6601-2008 be given first reading and be forwarded to
Public Hearing; and
6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading.
a. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and
receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement;
b. Amendment to Schedule "B" & "C" of the Official Community Plan;
c. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the
suitability of the site for the proposed development;
d. Road dedication as required;
e. Removal of the existing buildings;
f. A Restrictive Covenant for the duplex design must be registered at the Land Title
Office;
g. Park dedication as required.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Wayne Bissky
Howard M Kosaka
Legal Description: Lot: 55, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: 26073 and
Lot: 56, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: 26073
OCP:
Existing: Urban Residential and Conservation
Proposed: Urban Residential and Conservation
Zoning:
Existing: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), R-1
(Residential District), and RT -1 (Two Family Urban
Residential
Surrounding Uses
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS -1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential)
Designation Urban Residential and Conservation
South: Use: Currently: Single Family Residential;
Proposed: Single Family Residential and Park
Zone: Currently: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential);
Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential
District)
Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: CD -1-93 and RS -lb (One Family Urban (Medium
Density) Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation
West: Use: Townhouses
Zone: RM -1 (Townhouse Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
-2-
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential and Two Family Residential
Site Area: 1.294 HA (3.19 acres)
Access: 236 Street and 118 Avenue
Servicing: Full Urban
Companion Applications: SD/096/06
b) Project Description:
Application RZ/096/06 proposes to amend the Official Community Plan and proposes to rezone the
property located at 11774 and 11756 236 ST. The Official Community Plan amendment will
increase the designated conservation area to protect Cottonwood Creek. The rezoning will rezone
the subject property from RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential
District,
R-1 (Residential District), and RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential). Thisapplication is to support a
12 lot subdivision. The proposed size of each lot is not less than 2990 m2.(0.738 acres)
Road dedication will be provided along 236 Street. A large portion of the middle of the subject
property will be dedicated as park for geotechnical reasons and for the protection of Cottonwood
Creek. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, which states that "the land is safe for
geotechnical support of the proposed building foundations and backyards..."
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The subject property is designated Urban Residential and 236 Street and 118 Avenue are identified
as major corridor. According to the zoning matrix, this designation supports the R-3 (Special Amenity
Residential District, R-1 (Residential District), and RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zones.
3-20 Major Corridor Residential Infill developments must be designed to be compatible with
the surrounding neighbourhood and will be evaluated against the following criteria:
(a) building forms such as single detached dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes,
townhouses, apartments, and small lot intensive residential development subject to
Policy 3-21
(b) maximum building height of two and one-half storeys with an emphasis on ground
oriented units for all developments except for apartments.
The proposed R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone has a maximum height of
9.75 metres and 2 storey in height. The proposed R-1 (Residential District) zone has a
maximum height of 9.5 metres. The proposed RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zone
has a maximum height of 935 metres for a Two Family Residential Use. Those
properties zoned R-3 (Special Amenity District) will also be subject to an Intensive
Residential Development Permit to ensure a vibrant street presence.
-3-
(c) a maximum height of four storeys for apartments
This is not applicable as the proposal is for single family lots.
(d) adherence to Development Permit Guidelines for multi -family and intensive residential
development as outlined in Chapter 8 of the Official Community Plan.
The proposed R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) lots fronting 236 Street will
require an Intensive Residential Development and should comply with the applicable
Guidelines.
3-21 All Neighbourhood and Major Corridor Residential infill development will respect and
reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of established neighbourhoods, with
particular attention to:
(a) the ability of the existing infrastructure to support the new development
The proposed lots will be serviced by municipal services.
(b) the compatibility of the site design, setbacks and lot configuration with the existing
pattern of development in the area.
The proposal is consistent with the pattern of development in the surrounding area. The
proposed R-1 (Residential District) and RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential) lots front
118 Avenue, which face the larger single family lots to the north. The proposed higher
density R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) lots front 236 Street and face
townhouses.
(c) the compatibility between building massing and the type of dwelling units in the
proposed development and the surrounding residential properties.
The single family residential and two family residential lots in the proposed subdivision
are compatible with the surrounding single family residential and multi -family residential
lots in the surrounding area.
(d) the location, orientation, and visual impact of vehicle access/egress in relation to:
i. adjacent developments
ii. the street
iii. the pedestrian environment
The applicant will be required to plant street trees and as part of the Intensive
Residential Development Permit the applicant will provide a conceptual landscaping plan
for the proposed lots fronting. 236 Street, which will help to minimize the impact of
vehicle access/egress.
-4-
(e) Minimizing adverse parking and traffic impacts on the existing neighbourhood
Each proposed lot will be required to provide two off-street parking spaces.
(f) A gradual transition of scale and density through the design of building mass and form,
such as:
i. Reduction in building heights at the edges of a development;
ii. Location of lower density components towards the perimeters of a site; and
iii. Concentration of density to the centre of a development or towards a non-residential
boundary
The proposed subdivision is consistent with the density in the surrounding
neighbourhood and the proposal has a smaller scale than the existing townhouses to the
west.
(g) retention and preservation of significant trees, other natural vegetation, and
environmental features.
The centre portion of the subject property will be dedicated as park to protect the ravine
and Cottonwood Creek.
(h) maintaining adequate light, view and privacy for residents on adjacent properties or in
adjacent neighbourhoods;
The proposed subdivision is for single family dwellings and duplex; therefore, there
should be minimal impacts on light, view, and privacy.
(i) Conservation of special landscapes such as gardens, or built -form features, including
heritage buildings, that contribute to the unique character of the neighbourhood.
This is not applicable as there are no special landscapes or built -form features.
Zoning Bylaw:
The proposed 12 lot subdivision layout is compatible with the surrounding area and complies with
the minimum lot width, lot depth, and lot area requirements of the proposed R-3 (Special Amenity
Residential Distrcit, R-1 (Residential District), and RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential).
Development Permits:
The proposed lots fronting 236 Street are proposed to be zoned R-3 (Special Amenity Residential
District); therefore, these lots will be subject to an Intensive Residential Development Permit. The
purpose of the Intensive Residential Development Permit is to provide a greater emphasis on high
standards in aesthetics and quality of the building environment while protection important qualities
of the natural environment.
-5-
Cottonwood Creek runs through the centre of the property; therefore, the property is subject to a
Watercourse Protection Development Permit. Dedication of the centre portion of the subject
property will be required to protect this watercourse.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has reviewed the application and has provided the following
comments:
1. Remove existing curb letdown and reconstruct curb on south side of 118 Avenue, 55
metres west of 236B Street.
2. Concrete sidewalk and boulevard construction is required along the south side of 118
Avenue, from 60 metres east of 236 Street to the crosswalk at the west side of 236B
Street.
3. There is a need for 1.9 metres of road dedication along the 236 Street front plus a 3
metre by 3 metre corner truncation at the intersection.
4. At the subdivision stage a Development Variance Permit will be required to retain the
existing aboveground utility company plant along the east side of 236 Street fronting
the site.
5. To provide access and service connections to the proposed Lot 12 at the subdivision
stage it will be necessary to remove part of an existing retaining wall and to construct a
new wall that will support the 118 Avenue road and the lot driveway.
6. The sanitary sewer and storm sewer connections for the duplex on Lot 12 exists on
118 Avenue. The storm sewer is shallower than the sanitary sewer so this will
increase the elevation of the building footing.
e) School District Comments:
A referral has been sent to the School District for comments. Any comments will be provided prior to
the Public Hearing.
f) Intergovernmental Issues:
Local Government Act:
An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any
affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section
882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, to increase the Conservation boundary
-6-
is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond
existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council
of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and
Provincial Governments.
The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste
Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact.
g) Environmental Implications:
There is a Targe ravine that runs through the middle of the property and Cottonwood Creek runs
through this portion of land. Therefore, to protect these areas, the applicant will be required to
dedicate this portion of land to the District.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), R-1 (Residential District), and RT -1 (Two
Family Urban Residential) zones conforms to the land use designation in the Official Community
Plan. It is therefore recommended that application RZ/096/06 be favourably considered and that
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600-2008 (Appendix B) and Maple
Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6601-2008 (Appendix C) be read a first time and be forwarded to
Public Hearing.
Prepared by: /AdiLeung >
Pla ' ing Technician
L4j3pro
P, MCIP
or of Planning
Approved by:
Frank Quinn, MBA, P.En
GM: Public Works
evelo
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) • ule
Chief Administrative Officer
ment Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - OCP Amending Bylaw 6600-2008
Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw 6601-2008
Appendix D - Proposed Subdivision Layout
-7-
119 AVE.
"A"
,MS 2415
PARK
A
LMS 1818
LMS 1421
11757
11731
co
M
7
11656
9 -I
26
Isle
25
11608
0 -
FJ J
24
LMP
23
12726
22
21
3
16
11859
co 17
11641
N
18
11629
2 19
J 11817
dell
20
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
Appendix A
SCALE 1:2,500
District of
Pitt Meadows
IS
11756 & 11774 236 STREET
District of
Langley
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
�
MAPLE RIDGE
MAPLE1L LE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Oct 6, 2006 FILE: RZ/096/06 BY: PC
Appendix g
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6600-2008
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "B" & "C" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open
meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 6600-2008
2. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 55 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 26073 New Westminster District
And Lot 56 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 26073 New Westminster District
And outlined in heavy black line are hereby amended as shown on Map No. 761, a
copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw
3. Schedule "C" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 55 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 26073 New Westminster District
And Lot 56 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 26073 New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black, are hereby amended by adding and removing Conservation as
shown on Map No. 762 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw
4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME the day of
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of
READ A SECOND TIME the day of
READ A THIRD TIME the day of
, A.D. 200 .
, A.D. 200 .
, A.D. 200 .
, A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 .
MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
'A"
'A: 2.58 ha
2415
—
25405`
RK
LIR 76°4
A
2.2235 ho
LMS 1818
21
77757
CD
N
S 1421
3.267 ha
71737
118880 M
11870 a
C
10� 1 2 3
11662 o t ti
111856 _, N ' h
MP91 181 ' 2669 h
�
10
ry'I N ry
-12
273078 11887
— 3
11687
LMP11
1180N
r-
28
28,'
77840
27
71825
36
7
11._ a
J
0_
M▪ 14
1187
417873
15
11865/
118 A AVE,
.r
4
16
n 118,53
— 17/1841
26 2
17578
25
17806
LMP
24 23
12726
22 21
1p
1811829
1911817
11811
20
ruz
ry 1 n 2 n 3 1 4
+p -
BCP 1039 1179.
11793
76 5
�rr�jJd,
r/ro s
in 117639 g0
111110 11 �N
BCP 0392
W 1/2
21
P 1676
11798 n
17 18ry
1 1 74 4
11692
58
P 34262
0.809 ha
B
2.58 ho
LMP 30235
PARKI
BCP !23179
A
VAPLE TGE OFFICIAL COV
Bylaw No. 6600-2008
Map No. 761
From: Conservation and Residential
To:
V
\ I TY PLA
Residential and Conservation(shown hatched)
AVE\DI\G
MAPLE RIDGE
Bii1,shCctur b
1:2500
.A..
EA: 2.58 no
2415
25405' V s
ARK
LDAP �26°
2917
r JPSg2 z~ — -�
1882
r
A
2.2235 ha
LMS 1818
21
117,57
17737
_MS 1421
3.267 ho
778tg
11870 a
C
ti
N
1 1
7789.9
10 LMP 9 82 7307
77862 O s�
1785 8
N
p, 161 X23669
LMP11736
7785N 13'
'
7184028
27
77826
0
263
77878
25
71806
CN
12
7 7627, 277887
2
3
N157865,
118 A AVE.
13
77887
0
M14
1187
417873
LMP
2423
22
N
4
CO
n 1677853
1711847
726
21
b
1877829
1971877
71871
20
11774
N
10
77898
8
77888
R 1 7
IN Lh11892
77897
2 M 11888
N
17882 7
CV
N
178766
718705 Cr
4 _1
77864
17854
3
71842
11820
1
2
PARK
3 a45
PARK
4 1
5
Q/
sr,/
REM./22
P 1676
P-$
/
N
W 1/2
21
P 1676
118
rr
•=0 9 ho
73
tr
N
h 1 n 2 ry�3 4
P 1 '13927779
9
:
1156 ---
1110 116'
BCP 0392
71756
1.287 ho
77744
77692
58
P 34262
0.809 ho
B
2.58 ho
LMP 30235
PARK
BCP 23179
vAPLE DGE OFFICIAL COM
Bylaw No. 6600-2008
Map No. 762
PURPOSE:
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
1/
v
U\ITY PLA
AV
E\DI\
G
TO ADD TO CONSERVATION ON SCHEDULE C
TO REMOVE FROM CONSERVATION ON SCHEDULE C •
1:2500
4ppei61i. C
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6601-2008
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6601-2008."
2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 55 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 26073 New Westminster District
And Lot 56 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 26073 New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line are hereby rezoned as shown on Map No. 1434 a
copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 .
MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
.: 2.58 ha
2415
RK
LMp 2
6043-,
LSP 2912
A
2.2235 ho
LMS 1818
77757
117J7
N5 1421
3.267 ho
178(
17870
c
10 9 8 7
LMP 21'307
7785210 - up
o
71856 l '
9
MP1 181 $ sss
LMP1 1 73 6
7185 5 f 3
r r-
28
17840
27
1786
26
71578
2�
0
5
3
1
—12
77867
13
71887
0
147787)
15
17865,
A AVE.
N
4
16
N 718
X17
77847
25
77806
LMP
24 23
ry
12726
22 21
h
187 7829
X19
71877
77774
7 7744
71692
55
58
P 34262
0.809 ha
VALE TGE ZO\E A
Bylaw No. 6601-2008
Map No. 1434
From: RS-3(One Family
To
///
11871
20
7
W 1/2
21
P 1676
118 AVE.
P 26073
0.809 ha
B
2.58 ha
LMP 30235
PARK
BCP 23179
A
VE\DI\G
Rural Residential)
PAID(
R-1(Residential District) RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential)
R-3(Special Amenity Residential District)
1:2500
1
1'
N
a6pla aldepy
'39045 439£2 - 9SL L 1 ' iLL 11
90/960/Z9 3uawdolana0
le!wap!saa pasodoJd
,o
SR/W Nan II0,10344
uogeolpaa peas
lahlt veld a1!S
s"o /
/ —
m
um:r
ger
:w
AMSSI9 113NSVM 5M301.
1
0
m
•
m
J
is t m9 1
i
1� I p-. I R
l---a--J
S
ai
MAPLE RIDGE
6ritish Columbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: August 13, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: DVP/087/07
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: CoW
SUBJECT: Variance Permit
23940 118 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A Development Variance to the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 4800-
1993 is being sought by the applicant. The proposal includes a request to vary the requirement to
convert to underground wiring fronting the proposed R-1 (Residential District) zone and the retention
of the Telus plant across the frontage of the property on 118 Avenue. This variance request is
supported by Council Policy 9.05.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/087/07 respecting property
located at 23940 118 Avenue.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context
Applicant:
Owner:
McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. James
Leigh A Holt, Sheena Holt, Kamatt Ventures Ltd
Legal Description: Lot: 29, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: 18230
OCP:
Existing: Urban Residential and Conservation
Zoning:
Existing: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: R-1 (Residential District)
1105
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
Requested Variance:
b) Project Description:
Single Family Residential
RS -1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential)
Urban Residential
Single Family Residential
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Urban Residential and Conservation
Single Family Residential
CD -1-93 (Comprehensive Development)
Urban Residential and Conservation
Single Family Residential and Conservation
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Urban Residential and Conservation
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
0.615 HA (1.519 acres)
118 Avenue and 117B Avenue
Full Urban
RZ/087/07, SD/087/07, DP/087/07
1) Retention of the above -ground utility company
service connections to the existing house.
2) Retention of the above -ground utility plant for Telus
and BC Hydro across the frontage of the property on
118 Avenue.
A development variance application has been made in support of a development plan for a 5 lot
subdivision application (SD/087/07) under the R-1 (Residential District) zone. The proposed size of
each lot is not less than 374 m2 (4025 ft2). This application was made to support the retention of
the above -ground utility company service connections to the existing house and retention of the
above -ground utility plant for Telus and BC Hydro across the frontage of the property on 118 Avenue.
Currently, proposed Lot 1 has an existing house that the applicant would like to retain. The existing
house will be removed at a future subdivision stage and the new lots fronting on 118 Avenue will
then be serviced by underground utility systems. Proposed Lot 1 will be hooked to a portion of land
on the east side of proposed Lot 2. The south portion of the subject property will be dedicated as
park for the protection of Horseshoe Creek.
-2-
c) Planning Analysis:
A Development Variance Permit is required to support retention of the above ground Telus plant
along the frontage of 118 Avenue. This DVP is supported by Council Policy 9.05, attached as
Appendix B.
The applicant also requests to retain of the above -ground utility company service connections to the
existing house. The house will be removed at a future subdivision stage and the new lots fronting on
118 Avenue will then be serviced by underground utility systems. The Engineering Department is
supportive of this variance request.
CONCLUSIONS:
Given that the variance request is supported by Council Policy, it is recommended that DVP/087/07
be given favourable consideration.
AC
�
Prepared by: Jen Csikos
l Planning Technician
Approved by: Jan ickering, MCP, MCIP
Director of Planning
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Pgiblic Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
JC/dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Property
Appendix B - Council Policy 9.05
-3-
CO
0
0)
2N
p 46'
1�
0
N
LM
A
s
0
w
3N
317
w
4N
8802
3 4
ap
(0
N N
0
N
CO
CO1
5
10
0)
CO
CO
N
18051
L,12
12
0)
CO
CON.
11
CO
COM
CO
,13
COCO
0)
rn
m
N
5
CO
11818
15
11806
14
.,*LMP 28456
43797
10 9
caO 061
I -123862
W 23866
n W
1-A. 23870
Oa N
co CON.
0)
W
W
MN
0)
"'1coCOCOW
N
N
N
N
N
N
8
13
14
15
16
17
LMP 4f3796
CD
N
LC)
0
w
49
M
to
CO
CON
P
23165
50
51
{lpoend k A
11805
P 182:
0
10
0
N
0
0
0
0)
N
Subject Property
30
38
11787
39
P 20411
11773
40
41
P 20411
11765
P
P 13265
11711
A
EP 35041
11693
SCALE 1:1,500
23940-118 Ave
MAPLE RIDGE
Sr ti h Calumhla
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Aug 12, 2009 VP/087/07 BY: PC
MAPT RIDGE
Incorporated 12 September. 1874
Appendix
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TITLE: CONVERSION OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY WIRING TO
UNDERGROUND WIRING
POLICY NO. 9.05
APPROVAL DATE: July 23, 1996
POLICY STATEMENT:
Council will support development variance permit applications to waive the requirement of Maple Ridge
Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 4800-1993 as amended, to provide underground wiring
on highway right of ways serviced by existing overhead utility systems, where the abutting road is
required to be upgraded to an urban standard, on the following conditions:
1. The existing overhead utility system is shown on the attached plan, or
2. There is less than a total of 250 metres of contiguous redevelopment potential fronting both sides
of the highway right of way designated on the Official Community Plan.
Further, in those cases where undergrounding of existing overhead utility lines is required, and a
development has less than 250 metres of frontage on the highway right of way, the developer will service
his development with underground dips off the overhead line and deposit with the Municipality sufficient
funds to achieve the required undergrounding in the future.
Date Printed: 2009-08-13
Page 1 of 1 Policy 9.05
MAPLE RIDGE
British Calm Gla
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Development Permit/ Development Variance Permit
11900 Haney Place
DATE:
FILE NO:
ATTN:
August 19, 2009
DP/023/09
DVP/023/09
C of W
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This Development Permit / Development Variance Permit application was deferred by Council to
the August 31, 2009 Committee of the Whole meeting. The information in this report should be
read in conjunction with the staff report dated July 13, 2009.
RECOMMENDATION:
That this report be received as information and that Council reconsider the recommendation
found within the staff report dated July 13, 2009 as Appendix 'A' of this report.
DISCUSSION:
A Development Permit application has been received to permit the construction of a two storey
Commercial building intended for use as a financial institution at the south west corner of 11990
Haney Place, within the parking lot of Haney Place Mall. The applicant seeks to develop under the
existing C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) zone of the subject property and therefore does not require
rezoning of the property. The development site is, however, subject to a Town Centre Development
Permit to address the form and character of the development. The Maple Ridge Town Centre
Development Permit Area Guidelines are part of the OCP under section 8.11.
A Development Variance Permit application has been received to reduce the minimum height
required under the C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) zone from three storeys to two storeys on the
northwest and south elevation and one storey on the east elevation. The variance request pertains
exclusively to this development project. Any other development or development variance request on
this site would be the subject of a new application and could not proceed without Council approval.
This proposal was presented at Committee of the Whole on July 20, 2009 where it was forwarded to
the July 28, 2009 Council meeting. At the Council meeting, the application was deferred to the
August 31, 2009 Committee of the Whole meeting.
-1-
1106
DISCUSSION (Cont'd.):
Representatives of the owner have been in contact with the District and much of the discussion
revolved around the following attributes of the project:
Mall Vision
• The Mall owners have a vision for Haney Place Mall that involves "de -mailing" it to
residential over commercial development. While no commitment or timeline has
been received for the completion of this vision, this project is one step in line with
that vision.
• The "empty lot" viewscape at 224th Street and Lougheed Highway will be replaced
with a building that frames the 224th Street corridor.
• HBC/Zellers, the anchor tenant at Haney Place Mall, has a provision in their lease
that allows them to approve or reject any new structures on the site and this limits
the mall's ability to re -develop. The tenant has advised that they will not approve a
structure taller than what is proposed.
• The development proposal includes several pedestrian walkways that are supported
in the Civic Core Pedestrian network in the Downtown Area Plan.
Economic Development
• The District has made significant investments in the town centre to encourage
private sector development. This proposal represents a significant investment by the
private sector.
• This development proposal will keep a major employer within the town centre. A
major employer occupying 6,000 square feet and wanting 10,000 square feet is
being accommodated.
• A new building at this intersection will increase foot traffic at one of our main
intersections.
Building Development
• Originally, the financial institution had wanted a drive through access to the bank
machines. This has been dropped to help further advance pedestrian traffic.
• A number of Right -of -Way issues are being resolved that have been outstanding for
some time.
• The project, as proposed, received favourable comments by the Advisory Design
Panel.
-2-
CONCLUSION:
This report is for information only and should be read in conjunction with the staff report dated July
13, 2009.
Prepared by: Chad 'R. Goddard, BA, MA
Manager of Development and Environmental Services
' Approved by: Jane Pic ring, MCP, MCIP
Director of Planning
pproved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & DedeIo
Concurrence: J L. (Jim) Rule
hief Administrative Officer
ment Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
• Appendix A - Staff Report dated July 13, 2009
-3
MAPLE MTGE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Development Permit/ Development Variance Permit
11900 Haney Place
DATE:
FILE NO:
ATTN:
4p1iencc A
July 13, 2009
DVP/023/09 &
DP/023/09
C of W
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A Development Permit application has been received for the above noted property to permit the
construction of a two storey Commercial building intended for use as a financial institution. The
development site will be subject to a Town Centre Development Permit to address the form and
character of the development.
A Development Variance Permit application has also been received to reduce the minimum required
height under the C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) zone from three storeys to two storeys on the
northwest and south elevation and one storey on the east elevation.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/023/09 respecting property
located at 11900 Haney Place; and further
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/023/09.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Existing:
Proposed:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Urban Design Group Architects Ltd.
Amarsham Holdings Ltd
Parcel "127" District Lots 398 and 401, Group 1,
New Westminster District, Explanatory Plan
65997
Town Centre Commercial
Town Centre Commercial
C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Subject Site:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Previous Applications:
b) Project Description:
Haney Place Mall, Leisure Centre
C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Town Centre Commercial, Institutional and Park
Financial Building (Bank of Montreal)
C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Town Centre Commercial
Restaurant (Bella Vita)
C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Town Centre Commercial
Restaurant (Tim Horton's)
C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Town Centre Commercial
Parking lot for Haney Place Mall
Financial Institution
9,480.5 m2 (2.3 ac) of a 49,412 m2 (12.2 ac) site
224th Street
Full Urban
RZ/025/98, RZ/011/82, RZ/030/80
A Development Permit application has been made in support of a two storey commercial building
located at 11900 Haney Place. The proposed building is approximately 929 m2 (10,000 ft2) with
557.4m2 (6000 ft2) at grade level and the balance above. The development area has frontages on
two major roadways; Lougheed Highway and 224th Street. The main entrance faces south to
Lougheed Highway and the secondary entrance faces north to this existing parking lot.
The project will be principally accessed from 224th Street with a secondary access point from 226
Street. The existing right in / right out access along Lougheed Highway is proposed to be closed and
replaced with parking. The new development has provided for the required 47 stalls for the new
building in addition to the 706 spaces required for Haney Place Mall. Located within the parking
area are a network of raised pedestrian walkways to connect the proposed building to the existing
mall and the city sidewalk along Lougheed Highway. This network functions as a distinctive
pedestrian route which facilitates flow between the buildings, parking area and city sidewalks. They
are distinctively paved and flanked by landscaping, trees, benches and in some areas an overhead
pergola structure to create shade reducing the heat island effect of the parking lots.
New landscaping is proposed for the entire southwest corner of the site, extending north to the main
vehicular access point and east to the existing commercial building site located on the west side of
225 Street. This perimeter landscaping will be irrigated to ensure the longevity of the plantings. The
existing mature perimeter trees along both 224th Street and Lougheed Highway have been retained
and enhanced with 11 other perimeter trees. Additionally, two new trellis structures are proposed
along the Lougheed frontage to assist in screening the parking area. Benches, bike racks and
decorative posts are strategically located in the open pedestrian gathering area at the main
entrance of the building.
-2-
The commercial building is composed of reclaimed brick accent walls on all faces to support the
traditional style of Maple Ridge's character brick buildings. Additionally, thirty-five foot parapets
have been incorporated into the design to give the appearance of additional height and a strong
street presence. In terms of siting, the building has been pulled to the southwest corner of the
property accessing the intersection of 224 Street and Lougheed Highway.
Green Initiatives:
Green items have been introduced for this development as per the following:
• Permeable pavers to minimize storm run off;
• White TPO roofing material to minimize the heat island effect;
• Optimize energy performance by using recycled R 20 exterior wall insulation;
• Energy efficient lighting with shields and controls which will minimize light pollution;
• Reclaimed brick will be used to minimize land fill impacts; and
• Long term and short term bike racks have been provided to promote alternative choices in
transportation.
A District owned traffic kiosk and a fire hydrant are currently located in the southwest corner of the
subject site. They conflict with the proposed urban plaza to be created at the building's main
entrance. The encroaching amenities should be relocated to further enhance the new plaza.
Additionally, a portion of the intersection of 224 Street and Lougheed Highway and a portion of the
sidewalk encroaches onto the subject site. Normally road dedication and encroachments are
beyond the scope of a Development Permit to resolve. However, in the spirit of cooperation, the
District and the applicant (Narland) have come to an agreement as follows:
In exchange for the District relocating the encroaching amenities to another location, the applicant
has agreed with the following work to be done by the District:
1. Prepare the necessary legal agreements and surveys required to obtain road dedication on
224th Street and Lougheed Highway; and
2. Prepare the necessary legal agreements and surveys required to obtain statutory right-of-
ways for public access and the relocated District amenities.
The applicant has also agreed to contribute $20,000.00 towards the cost of extending the "Spirit
Square" sidewalk improvements along the east side of 224th Street fronting the new Building and
parking lot area.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
This development is subject to the guidelines applicable to Section 8.11 Maple Ridge Town Centre
Development Permit Area Guidelines of the Official Community Plan. A Town Centre Development
Permit is required for all new commercial development in the Town Centre and aims to regulate the
form and character of development located within the Development Permit area.
-3-
The development proposal is located within the Civic Core Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan.
New development in this precinct should provide more retail activity, higher density housing,
improve pedestrian and bicycle accessibility and build upon the Core's great public spaces. This
development respects the key guideline concepts as outlined in this section.
i) Promote the Civic Core as the "heart" of the Town Centre:
The proposed building is designed with brick accent walls to reflect the character of
other existing building in the Civic Core such as the ACT, Randy Herman building and
City Hall. The pedestrian realm is being enhanced by perimeter and parking lot
landscaping; a public plaza; benches at the main entrance and the expansion of the
Sprit Square standard on the east side of 224 Street to Lougheed Highway.
ii) Create a pedestrian -oriented, boutique -style shopping district:
The siting of the building helps support a strong pedestrian oriented urban realm by
defining the street creating a corner landmark building and upgrading the sidewalk to
sustain active public corridors.
iii) Reference traditional architectural styles:
With the reclaimed brick being used for the facade, the development references Maple
Ridge's more traditional architectural styles.
iv) Capitalize on important views:
The second floor of the building has a view of the mountains. The building also frames
the 224th Street view corridor.
v) Enhance existing cultural activities and public open space:
Through the setback of the building at the intersection of 224th and Lougheed Highway ,
the proponents have, in essence, provided a public outdoor meeting space encouraged
by the Town Centre Area Plan. Additionally, the Parks Department has been in contact
with the developer and the leasee to take advantage of the urban plaza as a potential
space for a piece of public art.
vi) Provide climate appropriate landscaping and green features:
The landscape elements have been designed to enrich the pedestrian environment with
the pedestrian corridors located within the parking lot. Additional landscaped islands
are proposed in the parking area for positive visual impact and to reduce the urban heat
island effect.
-4-
vii) Maintain street interconnectivity:
The eliminated vehicular access along Lougheed Highway has been identified as part of
the Civic Core Pedestrian Network on the Multi -Modal Transportation Network. identified
in the Town Centre Area Plan. The raised pedestrian walkway proposed through the
parking lot meets this objective.
Additionally, the east/west connection road through Haney Place Mall has been
identified as part of the Bicycle Network in the Maple Ridge Town Centre Area Plan. The
proponent is proposing to upgrade the sidewalk alignment on the north side of the main
access road to include a meandering sidewalk, a generous amount of planting and a
pedestrian bench.
Development Variance:
The proponent is developing under the existing zoning of C-3 (Town Centre Commercial). The
proposed use of the building is a financial institution, which is allowed under the C-3 (Town Centre
Commercial) zone. Accordingly, the siting, setbacks and other aspects of the development conforms
with the Zoning Bylaw except the height of the building. A Development Variance Permit is required
to allow this development to proceed as proposed.
A Development Variance Permit application has therefore been received to vary the requirements of
the Zoning Bylaw.
• To vary the maximum building height in the C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) zone from the
minimum 3 storeys required to two storeys on the north-west and south elevation and one
storey on the east elevation.
The developer is seeking to add an additional building to the existing shopping centre site which is
encumbered with building restrictions under the provisions of an anchor tenant lease. Under this
agreement, the anchor tenant has approved the location and the two storey design of the proposed
subject building. The applicant has informed the District that the anchor tenant will not agree to a
three storey building located in the parking area of the shopping centre. Additionally, as the
intended use of the building is a financial institution, security issues are a concern. Therefore, the
potential building leasee would only consider a two storey, stand alone building with no other leasing
tenants.
In an attempt to reconcile the minimum height requirements and the existing tenant lease, the
project architects designed the building with second floor parapets to give the illusion of additional
height on a predominantly two storey building.
-5-
d) Advisory Design Panel:
The proposed project was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel on July 14, 2009 at which time the
following resolution was passed:
The Panel commended the applicant on their presentation and choice of material but would like
the following issues addressed with the Planning Department:
1. Skate proof the sitting feature in the plaza area
To skate proof the concrete benches the applicant will install raised "L" brackets at 3'
intervals at the edge of concrete benches.
2. More trees added around the North and East elevations of the building in lieu of any
additional parking
The proponent has added trees on North and East elevation as per panel's suggestion.
3. Submit the mechanical (roof top) screening details to the planner for review
A plan detailing the mechanical screening has been received.
4. Confirm whether the glazing on the building is clear or tinted (the Panel would prefer
clear glazing at the grade level)
The architect for the project confirmed that glazing at ground level will be clear.
5. The Panel is supportive of integrating public art into the proposed plaza
The developer is committed to work closely with the District to appropriately locate a
public art into the proposed plaza.
e) Inter -governmental issues:
In accordance with the Environmental Management Act and the Contaminated Sites Regulation
(CSR), the District received a site profile on the subject property. As the subject site was previously
the location of a gas station, it was determined that a Schedule 2 reference, "F5 - petroleum
product, other than compressed gas, dispensing facilities, including service stations and card locks"
was applicable to this site and the site profile was forwarded to the Ministry of Environment for
action in accordance with Section 7 of the Contaminated Sites Regulation.
-6-
Correspondence from the Ministry confirms that they do require a preliminary site investigation for
the subject site which generally prohibits the ability of the District to approve the Development
Permit. However, the Ministry has provided the District a letter indicating they are prepared in this
instance to provide the necessary release to the District to issue the DP under the condition that the
applicant obtains the necessary Ministry approval prior to building occupancy. The applicant is
confident that they can deal with any possible site contamination issue and are therefore willing to
proceed. The Building Department has been made aware of this restriction and will consult with the
Ministry as part of the Building Permit process.
f) Financial Implications:
A refundable security equivalent to 2.5 % of the estimated value of construction will be provided by
the developer to ensure that the development, including the landscaping, is carried out in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on an estimated
construction value of $ 1,625,000 the security will be $40,625.00.
The applicant will also provide a $20,000.00 contribution to the extension of the 224 Street - Spirit
Square sidewalk improvements prior to DP issuance.
For its part, the District will be responsible for the financial obligations of relocating the District
amenities and preparing and registering all legal agreements, land surveys, explanatory plans and
related documents
g) Alternatives:
Under Section 919.1(d) of the Local Government Act and Section 8.11 of the Official Community
Plan the property has been designated a Development Permit Area with special requirements for
commercial development. Council approval is required for all development in the Town Centre
Development Permit Area prior to a Building Permit being issued. Council can reject the DP on the
grounds that they feel the development permit guidelines have not been met. The Development
Variance to reduce the required height of the building is required prior to approval of the
Development Permit. If Council does not support the requested variance, the Development Permit
cannot be approved. The District would still have to resolve District amenities on the applicant's
land. It should be noted that these items were most likely installed by the Ministry of Highways
when Lougheed Highway was still under their jurisdiction.
-7-
CONCLUSION:
As the development proposal complies with the majority of the Town Centre Development Permit
Area Guidelines and the proposed building includes green building components, it is recommended
that VP/023/09 and DP/023/09 be favorably considered.
Prepared by.
en Csikos
lanning
echnician
P, MCIP
Approved 4': Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Pulte Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J. L Ji my 2ule
VChief Administrative Officer
JC/dp
•
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Site Plan
Appendix C - Building Elevations
Appendix D - Landscape Plans
-8-
i
EP 9471
co
RAN
0
<0
w
O
N
! A 11969
B 11965/67
RP 52529
Pcl. "C"
11955
1 11939
RP78676 /51
44
11915/19
11909
P 3206)
z 8
CS111893/95
B
11889
Rem 9
0
a
Rem 10
11867
11863/65
65
n 106
P 53381
e 11855
v
28
29
11841
30
11841
4
R
0)
01
N
01
/10)
E
2/
3'nf 13
RP 7636
P 79776
A
11811
Rem
50
Rem3
R� 143 2
4 i 1 11777
v
130
996 m P 87041
11A ' EP 11502
116941'92/94 103
P 49778
P 4076
11992/99
McINTOSH
11966/70 14
P4076
11952/54/59
BCP35451
1 §
N
11955/65
0
c
McINTOSH AVE
01
10
LMP 46699
A
P51411 11743
1
LMP 46997
PCI. A
LMP 30487
11784
EP 9742
1177479
94
P 44960
Rem.
118
P 60562
Municipal Hall
11995
SUBJECT PROPERTY
P 60451
Rem.
118
P 60562
1
P 68843
Courthouse
11960
Arts Centre
11944
11850
Zellers
IRer;11
117
RCMP
11990
Haney Place Mall
11900
CP
NWS 2403
2
11996
3
0
N
rn
Z
CC
0
Rem.
West Rem.
81.5 4
Feet
4
P 7863
064
o
m
CL
McINTOSH AVE.
P 60562
120
11825
93
F44.2. CL
� v
LOUGHEED HIGHWAY
P 5414
EP 8383
111
2
1 2 A 11783 p,a
11781
Rem 5
12779
P 8274 4
'PP092 11771
n o
�a
R68
11767
C /69
B 11763
/65
69
11759/61
NORTH AVENUE
C9
CD
D .
co
m
a
co
a10
gR
Pc▪ I
'1'
A
P 71022
P 6645
1770 C
P 5194
P 8641
Rem 311771
P4202 1 cL 9271
6 7 m 11767
tia a
11735
510
SELKIRK AVE.
ro
En
•.2529
22566 P 655452
22516 1
N
N
3
22528/30
"O
A
11837
10
12
P 8615
a
e
gi
WS
On
N
N
E
11
N
1
Plan 4834
LOUGHEED HWY.
P 4834
OR
N
N
1
P!
22516 1
N
N
3
22528/30
"O
A
P7-12538142
O
Ra
W
0
N
E
m
O
R4
a
e
gi
WS
On
N
N
E
22580
05
N
R
7
11760
62/64/66
14
P
22503
05/07/09
7 -
15
13
69
LANE
12
ROYAL
ROYAL CRES.
P21
C
62
D
9
ID
9 0 -
0
LMP 15
A
0r
10
11
P 7997
12
11876
13
1866
14
S
m
ROYAL CRES.
Rem. 58
P 48518
1742
18
19
11778
Rem.1
P 9819
11698
Rem. 2
P 1805
City of Pitt
Meadows
SCALE 1:2,500
District of
Langley
FRASER R.
11900 HANEY PLACE
f
MAPLE RIDGE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: May 5, 2009 FILE: DP/023/09 BY: PC
i:gii irk
itift
rtt�t .;1 1
S3I1b3dOad MNV1WN NOd
39 'BIM 31dYYV11Y111 33V1d ) NVH
IN311d01311301Y133111100
Mr
5J
w2.
CC
S311213d0dd ONV1NVN NOJ
09 '390121 31dY11 TIM 33V]d A3NYH
1N311d013A301VI3311100
4z wali
ce
W
111111111111111111.
S311113dOild CINVlelliN 210A
38 '39018 31dVN11VP 33Vld A3NVH
1NE(1011130 1V13i13111103
215ii 112
111/
r.•4 -
1E10 MI 111110/12.--,
uJ
0
u,
< 6
z
0
0
uJI
Et
0
0
3
I I
11
in
1
0
1
0
,0
0
Et1
LI
-a-
1
0
:5
0
Lai
1
111 Rh
°11
i
Aad p
F
4Q
Qa
..t=
y
N
1
I
•calllllllfflff Illll
MAPLE RIDGE
British Colu m6w
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT:
DATE:
FILE NO:
ATTN:
Development Variance Permit / Development Permit
11224 236 Street
August 19, 2009
DVP/049/09
DP/049/09
C of W
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An Intensive Residential Development Permit application has been made for subject property
located at 11224 236 Street. The Zone amending bylaw to the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential
District) zone is scheduled to appear before Council at the September 8, 2009 meeting.
The Intensive Residential Development Permit, which was established to provide a greater emphasis
on high standards in aesthetics and quality of the built environment while protecting important
qualities of the natural environment, applies to this proposed development. The development
proposal is in support of the 29 lots proposed under subdivision application SD/104/07.
A Development Variance Permit application has also been received to reduce the minimum required
lot depth in the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone from 27 metres to 24 metres for
proposed lots 1-12 and 14-16.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/049/09 respecting property
located at 11224 236 Street; and further
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/049/09.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Damax Consultants Ltd David Laird
Ronald C Davis, Margit Davis
Legal Description: Lot: 4, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: 24650
-1-
1107
OCP:
Existing:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Urban Residential, Conservation
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
Surrounding Uses
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
Designation Urban Residential
South:
East:
West:
Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
Designation: Urban Residential
Use: Park
Zone: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Conservation
Use: Currently Single Family Residential with greenhouses;
Zone: Currently RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential);
Designation: Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 1.533 HA (3.79 acres)
Access: 236 Street, 112 Avenue, and Creekside Street
Servicing: Full Urban
Companion Applications: RZ/104/07, SD/104/07, DP/050/09
a) Project Description:
This application is in support of subdivision application SD/104/07, which is for a 29 lot
subdivision. The proposed size of each lot is not less than 299.1 m2. The east portion of the
subject property will be dedicated as park for the protection of Horseshoe Creek. Road dedication
will be provided along 236 Street and on the east side of the property to connect Creekside Street.
b) Planning Analysis:
Intensive Residential Development Permit:
Intensive Residential Development Permit was established to provide a greater emphasis on high
standards in aesthetics and quality of the built environment while protecting important qualities of
the natural environment. The key guideline concepts for the development permit area are as
follows:
-2-
1. Neighbourhood cohesiveness and connectivity should be maintained through the design of
varied yet compatible buildings, in materials used and in architectural styles, in landscapes
and in recreational areas, and by facilitating a range of transportation choices.
There are six different building types in the 29 unit subdivision. For increased variety, with
building types 'A', `B' and `G' there are three exterior material design options to choose from,
essentially creating twelve visually different housing options. The site is located near the
Kanaka Creek Regional trail system and near the Kanaka Creek Elementary school allowing for
transportation choice to these two community amenities.
2. A vibrant street presence is to be maintained through a variety of housing styles, by
maintaining street parking and by directing garage structures and off-street parking to the
rear of a property accessible by a lane.
The houses are designed in a popular `craftsman' style and alternate in design along each street
front to ensure that there is no sense of repetition. In all instances, garages are provided within
the main house and not within a stand alone garage structure. Where houses have access to a
lane (units 17-29), garages have been located to the rear, increasing the vibrancy of street
presence.
c) Development Variance:
A Development Variance Permit application has been received to reduce the minimum required lot
depth in the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone from 27 metres to 24 metres for
proposed lots 1-12 and 14-16.
Under Development Variance Permit file VP/058/03, a variance was granted to the three lots to the
north of the subject property (Lots 14, 15, and 16) to reduce the minimum lot depth of the R-3
(Special Amenity Residential District) zone from 27 metres to 24 metres. Therefore, this proposal
will require a similar variance to continue the pattern of development that was previously approved.
The variance will reduce the lot depths of proposed lots 1-12 and 14-16. The minimum lot depth of
the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone is 27 metres. Proposed lots 1-12 will have a lot
depth of approximately 24 metres, proposed lot 14 will have a lot depth of approximately 26 metres,
and proposed lots 15 and 16 will have a lot depth of approximately 25 metres.
d) Financial Implications:
There will be 28 trees added to the municipal street tree inventory on completion of this project.
The costs associated with maintaining these trees will need to be included in a subsequent
operating budget.
- 3 -
CONCLUSION:
As the development proposal complies with the guidelines of the Intensive Residential Development
Permit Area, it is recommended that DP/049/09 be given favourable consideration.
1_ [tyzstah
Prepared by./ Jen Csikos
lanning Technician
90^-t Approved by: erin Jane Pic g, MCP,
MCIP
Y Director of Planning
pproved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public orks & DDe,opment Services
Concurrence: J.,L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
JC/dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Property
Appendix B - Proposed Subdivision
Appendix C - Lot Plans
Appendix D - Building Elevations
Appendix E - Streetscapes
-4-
PCI. 'A'
11355
9
28555
BCP
11 w
9
8
23542
7
398E
12
13
14
129
15
1128
1125 AVE.
524 N3
BCP 3989
2
11291
1
11251
11237
11346
4
11347
11336 R
2 0
L >n
11337
3
113AAVE
5
11342
11332
6
J
15
11316
N
14
BC
Y 23638
N
J -+
co W
CO
ci
2
12
3
16
11306
11296 L
1
23635
6163
4
5
11290
2
12 BAVE.
g8
11345
1Z 11335
U
7 7
0)
23610
I— 23620
-p J
rn 23630
0) OJ
23640
J
23650
BCP
W
23633
123641
123647 m
1
2 3
4
r
m
� �
2 N
N
112AAVE.
PARK
LMP 36163
11.224
Subject Property
Rem 4
P 24650
BCP 17360
A
BCP 21397
11
11195
10
11187
9
N. 11179
8
11171
39
2
22
2
21
20
BCF la 53
,,,1$;-{8,17
63
Fog. Rem 2
N 11145
a 26
12
11135
11125
27
111 AAVE.
KANAKA WAY
CREEKSIDE ST.
112 AVE.
Appendix ,4
Rem G
RP 1387
36
BCP 33222
BCP 26118
PARK
30
31
11155
45
32
11135
33
55
34
11115
35
11105
AMEN
City of Pitt, J
Meadows _ j '?,
5,
SCALE 1:2,500
District of
Langley
FRASER R.
29
27
28
23757
23753
26
N
11224-236 St
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Jul 8, 2009 DP/049/09
BY: PC
AffeilA
— Cree
1
j
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET / CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
Ig?p9a
;903
18;
0
qiU31:10
r 0569) 0(6 a .1d
strpAc(0 1.0en 0-0,)
OF 0E106(64 ,.2rn 14-1')
1.10 CT -id
tl
510E 1(0.0. 1.2m )3.-G
11
(((66) 01625
0
-171
b
g
g
1
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
e
zn
ep
Le. adal 41un — uo d Old
.,28„ adX1 }!un
0
1
O
H
Z
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET / CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
5:n -'al.
-0')
di
t, ro).RET0. -Td
t
.01
236A STREET
(.Li'BL1 W1.01d =7d
9,L951999 -9-117r—,6¢ 99-41
12M SESHAQT. IE,
19.
r
M%!
JV1/NVS 1'
W/M 'VS
6Z'S'9
90E SETBACK Lan 099121
•
tt6Si3 4159'12=7a'
St pie
—y
2
9�E
11
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET / CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
'0
'°,11
3a�a=�1
;0
JO„ adAl 3!u(1 — uoid T°Id I
00
0
-17
0
•
$o
0
0
0
O
0
co
co
VISE! Iei
F
0
N
W
9Fi
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET / CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
ad,ci 4!un — uo d io d
l.o.1L) w1e•1,z —1d it
SIDE science ,. z.,, 1—e'l
ill
C
V
m
Ei
ptl
SCE snenrx 1.2,- D
(f11.-L8L) WM-e2 Azid
($s6'Ls) w96,Z =1d
r
•
1
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET / CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
r
0o
O
CO
Appendbr 4
J
E
me
O
I
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET / CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
eoQ
9
L,}mi :II1, .
1.111
rY.�IFrll:�ll
p
0 �r
W
P
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET / CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
i 1111111111 l i 111
F
Me
me
0
0)
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET / CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
r
Z
a P
qa
113
WR
1
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET / CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
Fo
ew
rn0
0
c
0
m
r
0
W
149131-10N1011118 WS!'e
.J
0
m;
mOz
9 ry
ttr
9�{
r
elI
1
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET / CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
• m
cn
M
0
z
co
771
m
m
0
0a
nl
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
CD
fD
0
m
0
0
0
t0
m
cn
m
NCD
8
n
0
z
1
m
m
-o
co
0
-o
m
m
d
0
co
0)
c
N
(D
0
m
m
0
0
Q
(n N a
m m.
m
cnn
-1
m w
AppendLi- E
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET / CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
SITE SECTION / STREETSCAPE 4-4 (along Lane looking west)
0
-D
(n (/l
mm
m"
N m
m0
z
1
CD
m
um
8
0
0
z
m
m
m
m
0,
0
n
m
m
w
/a
0
D
N
N
c
m
-0-
0 O
x
N
CONCORDIA HOMES PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
236 STREET / CREEKSIDE STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.
DAMAX CONSULTANTS LTD.
4
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Award of Contract No. E02-036-008 -
DATE:
FILE NO:
ATTN:
August 10, 2009
E02-036-008
C of W
Management of Bus Benches 2009-2014
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The District supplies bus bench services to residents of Maple Ridge through a contract with Key -
Bench Advertising Ltd. The services include the supply, installation and maintenance of bus
benches throughout the District. The current contract has expired and a new contract has been
tendered. The recommended contract will continue and enhance the level of service for Maple Ridge
residents.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Contract No. E02-036-008 - Management of Bus Benches 2009-2014, be awarded to Key -
Bench Advertising Ltd.; and
THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and execute the contract.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Bus benches are located at bus stops on many of our transit routes for the convenience of
transit users. The District delivers this service through a contractor that supplies and
maintains the benches under a fee for service contact.
Key -Bench Advertising Ltd. has supplied, installed and maintained bus benches for Maple
Ridge under a fee for service contract from 2003 to 2008. The current contract has expired.
A tender for supplying and managing bus benches was advertized in the Vancouver Sun and
BC Bid. One tender was received from Key -Bench Advertising Ltd. Staff has analyzed the
tender and recommend proceeding with the contract.
There are presently 71 bus benches located within the District. The new contract provides
for 10 additional bus benches at locations to be mutually agreed to by the contractor and the
District. Under the terms of the new contract, Key -Bench Advertising Ltd. will be replacing all
existing wood plank bus benches with a new style of steel bench. This new style of bench
meets with the District's standards for street furniture.
b) Desired Outcome:
To obtain Council authorization for the Corporate Officer to sign and execute the contract
between Key -Bench Advertising Ltd. and the District of Maple Ridge.
1108
c) Strategic Alignment:
The Corporate Strategic Plan states that the District will provide high quality municipal
services to our citizens and customers in a cost effective and efficient manner. The District's
contract with Key -Bench Advertising Ltd. will provide a high quality service to residents of
Maple Ridge.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Council approval of this contract will allow the District to continue providing the convenience
of bus benches at key locations for transit users. It is anticipated that all existing wood plank
benches will be changed out within six months of award of contract. In addition, the new
contact will ultimately expand the number of benches and level of service for residents.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
The current contract involves a number of different departments including the Engineering,
Communications, Purchasing and Clerks Department.
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The capital, operating and maintenance costs for the bus benches are completely borne by
the contractor. The projected revenue stream to the District from this contract is in line with
our current Business Plan. The estimated revenue stream is attached under Article 3 of the
contract and is valued at $46,000 over five years.
g) Alternatives:
The District has operated the current arrangementunder contact for many years. Levels of
service are annually reviewed through the Business Planning process by staff and Council.
Purchasing staff has researched the marketplace and there are no experienced firms other
than Key -Bench Advertising Ltd. interested in this contract.
CONCLUSIONS:
The recommended contract to Key -Bench Advertising Ltd. will continue and enhance the level of
service for Maple Ridge residents. Council approval is recommended.
Submitteci bye Terry Fryer, PEng.
Acting 9un i
gineer
proved by:
n
Concurrence:
EO/me
Frank Quinn, MBA, Png.
G Public Works arid Development Services
J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
MAPLE RIDGE
British Coiumhia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: August 21, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: EO4-449-001 &
[01-052-001
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 136/09
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The developer of a property at 20252 Patterson Avenue was required to extend the sanitary sewer
along Patterson Avenue to serve the development. Part of the development servicing is considered
to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local Government Act. The extended
servicing benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC 136/09 provides the municipality's
assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or extended servicing to the benefiting
lands.
RECOMMENDATION:
That with respect to the development of lands located at 20252 Patterson Avenue, be it resolved:
1. That the cost to provide the excess or extended services is, in whole or in part, excessive
to the municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall be paid by the owner
of the land being developed, and
2. That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or extended services on the parcels
and in the amounts as set out in the staff report dated August 21, 2009, and further
3. That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Excess Capacity Latecomer
Agreement LC 136/09 with the developer of the said lands.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The attached map identifies the lands which are involved in the development and those
which will benefit from the excess or extended services. The cost breakdown for each
excess or extended service is shown on attached Schedule A.
1109
In addition, a copy of Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 136/09 is also attached for
information purposes.
b) Strategic Alignment:
Administration of excess or extended services legislation complies with the Smart Managed
Growth element of the Corporate Strategic Plan. The administration procedure supports the
requirement for a developer to construct municipal infrastructure in support of land
development and recognizes that the infrastructure may provide benefit to other land.
c) Policy Implications:
Part 26, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all
or part of the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality shall determine the
proportion of the cost of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and
determine the proportion of the cost of the service to be attributed to parcels of land which
the municipality considers will benefit from the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 136/09
will provide such determination.
CONCLUSION:
A developer has provided certain services in support of development of his property. Some of the
services benefit adjacent lands therefore, it is appropriate to impose Latecomer Charges on the
benefitting lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 136/09 summarizes the municipality's determination of
benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the term over which such Latecomer
Charges will be applied.
Reviewed y:arry Fryer,/'Eng.
/ cting Mir cipal ngineer
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng., --7
GM: public Worcs & Devejdpment Services
Concurrence: J.L. ,(Jim) Rule
Chilf Administrative Officer
TG/rs
Schedule A
TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE
1. ONSITE SERVICE FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY
SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF COST PER BENEFIT
LOTS BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED
BY PROPERTY
EXCLUDING
SUBDIVISION
Sanitary 5 $70,760.00 $14,152.00 Lot 49, Plan 35806
Sewer RN 20766-0500-9
1 x $14,152.00
Lot 50, Plan 35806
RN 20766-0600-2
1 x $14,152.00
Lot 51, Plan 35806
RN 20766-0700-6
$14,152.00
A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows:
List Properties Amount of Benefit
Lot 49, DL 222, Gp. 1, P35806, NWD $14,152.00
RN 20766-0500-9
Lot 50, DL 222, Gp. 1, P35806, NWD $14,152.00
RN 20766-0600-2
Lot 51, DL 222, Gp. 1, P35806, NWD $14,152.00
RN 20766-0700-6
16
1916
P 68232
,15 X14 4\1
a
BRUCE AVENUE
2
11
P
co
N12 13
68232
N10
P
w
0
J
d
w
0
N
9
69704
5 ,f-
11910 0
11906 cp
6
E
,..c2703
7 7
P 35806
46
ry
47
48
/
/ LP 85936
L.
Rem Pci ONE
P 62569
B
ENE•FITT
ROPE.R.T
.50
PATTERSON AVENUE
62
rn
61 60
PRIVATE
AGREEMENT
59
72548
31 32
N �
33
�r
2%
3
P
69.333
4in 5
ASHLEY CRESCENT
r\ N, ozi
36� 35 34N 9
n }nr rt n
V /
0
6
h
58
r
7N 8� 1r\
N N N
Rem •
RP 777
11871
c
P 35806
52
53
Qs)
Rem 54
DEVELOPMENT SITE
57
56 Rem
P 35806
P 6
2w
777
'n3�
20285
N N N N�
14 15 16 (N N.
DEVELOPMENT SITE
PRIVATE AGREEMENT
5
20287 r
6 c°
20289 n-
7
20291
2
CO 11789
N
rn
w1
11777
5
203 STREET
Io
0
111
118
/
RW 80
P. 801
BENEFITTING PROPERTY
0
0
> co
w 0-
E --
z
-
z
w ,,)
r7
SCALE:
N.T.S.
MAPLE RIDGE
Britian CokirnbIi
CORPORATION OF THE
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT
EXCESS CAPACITY/EXTENDED
SERVICES AGREEMENT
LC 136/09
DATE:
AUGUST 2009
FILE/DWG No LC 136-2009
EXCESS CAPACITY LATECOMER AGREEMENT
LC/136/09
THIS AGREEMENT made the day of , 2009:
BETWEEN:
Marilyn Jourdain
20252 Patterson Avenue
Maple Ridge BC V2X 2P4
(Hereinafter called the "Developer")
AND:
OF THE FIRST PART
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under
the "Municipal Act", having its offices at 11995 Haney Place, in the Municipality of
Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia
(Hereinafter called the "Municipality")
OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS:
A. The Developer has developed certain lands and premises located within the
Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more
particularly known and described as:
Lot 58, District Lot 222, Group 1, Plan 35806, NWD
(Hereinafter called the "said lands")
B. In order to facilitate the approval of the development of the said lands, the
Developer has constructed and installed the sanitary sewer shown on the design
prepared by Hub Engineering Inc., Drawing No. 07062-1, 07062-2, 07062-3, 07062-
4, dated Jan 2008 and reviewed as noted by the Municipality July 31/08.
(Hereinafter called the "Extended Services");
C. The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands
and other than the said lands;
D. The Municipality considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive;
E. The Developer has provided the Extended Services in the Amount of $70,760.00.
Page 1 of 3
F. The Municipality has determined that the following properties:
Lot 49, District Lot 222, Group 1, Plan 35806, NWD;
Lot 50, District Lot 222, Group 1, Plan 35806, NWD;
Lot 51, District Lot 222, Group 1, Plan 35806, NWD;
(the "Benefitting Lands") will benefit from the Extended Services;
G. The Municipality has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands
connecting to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the "Latecomer Charge") on
the Benefitting Lands in the following amounts:
Lot 49, District Lot 222, Group 1, Plan 35806, NWD
• $14,152.00 for connection to the sanitary sewer constructed by the developer.
Lot 50, District Lot 222, Group 1, Plan 35806, NWD
• $14,152.00 for connection to the sanitary sewer constructed by the developer.
Lot 51, District Lot 222, Group 1, Plan 35806, NWD
• $14,152.00 for connection to the sanitary sewer constructed by the developer.
plus interest calculated annually from the date of completion of the Extended
Services as certified by the General Manager - Public Works and Development
Services of the Municipality (the "Completion Date") to the date of connection by the
Benefitting Lands to the Extended Services;
H. The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and
collected by the Municipality shall pursuant to Section 939 (7) of the Local
Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 be paid to the Developer as provided for in
this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 939 (9) of the Local Government Act
R.S.B.0 1996, c. 323, The parties hereto agree as follows:
1. The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by
the Municipality within fifteen (15) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to the
Developer and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of the next June 30th or
December 31St that follows the date on which the Latecomer Charge was collected by the
Municipality.
2. This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any
purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer Charge by the Municipality to the
Developer, or fifteen (15) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the Municipality
shall be forever fully released and wholly discharged from any and all liability and obligations
herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer Charge, and whether arising before
or after the expiry of this Agreement.
Page 2 of 3
3. The Developer represents and warrants to the Municipality that the Developer has
not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from the
owner of the Benefitting Lands for the provision, or expectation of the provision of the
Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein; and further
represents and warrants that he has not entered into any agreement with the owner of the
Benefitting Lands for consideration in any way related to or connected directly or indirectly
with the provision of the Extended Services. The representations and warranties of the
Developer herein shall, notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Agreement, survive the expiry of
this Agreement.
4. The Developer (if more than one corporate body or person) hereby agrees that the
Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in equal
shares.
5. If the Developer is a sole corporate body or person, the Municipality shall remit the
Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the following
(name and address of director of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.):
6. In the event that the Developer is not the owner of the said lands, the owner shall
hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto the Developer, his heirs and assigns, all
rights, title and interest under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective Corporate Seals,
attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf, the day and
year first above written.
Authorized Signatory - Developer
The Corporate Seal of the CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE was
hereunto affixed in the presence of:
Corporate Officer - Authorized Signatory
Page 3of3
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: August 7, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Terry Fox Run
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The committee for the Terry Fox Foundation is requesting permission to use municipal streets for the
Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Terry Fox Run on Sunday, September 13, 2009. A map showing the run
routes is attached.
Authorization from Council is required in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By-
law 3136-1982" to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Terry Fox Run on
Sunday, September 13, 2009, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule 'A' attached to the staff
report dated August 7, 2009 are met.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for
organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually
given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability for injury or
damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as
Schedule 'A.'
The Terry Fox Run will start and finish at Hammond Stadium and will consist of three venues:
a 1 km, 5 km and a 10 km run. The run starts at 10:00 am and will finish by 12:30 pm. A
map showing the routes is attached to Form 'A' along with the letter of request. Participants
will be utilizing the road shoulders or sidewalks; and as such there will be no road closures.
b) Strategic Alignment:
Permitting of Maple Ridge street events promotes community development and often
highlights Maple Ridge's natural and built features.
1110
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets may cause some delays and inconveniences to other
road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the event organizers.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP
for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as
Coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service).
e) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal
streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff
processing effort.
f) Policy Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices.
g) Alternatives:
The District could refuse to permit the run to occur. In this event, the organizer would have
to cancel the event.
CONCLUSIONS:
From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events
and activities. The Terry Fox Run was held in Maple Ridge last year without incident.
Submitted
y erry F r,
Acting Ni
Eng.
icipal Engineer -•.i
Approved by: Frank uinn, MBA, PEng."-----
GM: P blic Works & Developmeit Services
Concurrence: J.L. Jim) Rule
Chi Administrative Officer
AW/ml
Schedule 'A' To Council Memorandum Dated August 7. 2009
Terry Fox Run
Condition of Approval
Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers:
1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the
R.C.M.P., and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District);
2. notify local Fire Department, and Ambulance Services of the event;
3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses;
4. obtain any required permits from the District of Maple Ridge Parks and Leisure Services
Department for park facility use;
5. make arrangements for all surrounding businesses and residents for access purposes
during the event;
6. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of
the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date);
7. must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times.
8. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out
of or in any way connected with the event;
9. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability
insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have
the following statement written in the policy:
"Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy
shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in
writing to the District."
Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy
shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the
Corporate Officer prior to the event; and
10. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which
existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of
the District.
The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw permission to use
municipal streets for this and future events should the organizers fail to comply with the above
requirements.
Chief Administrative Officer
terry fox 0' for cancer research
Engineering Dept.
District of Maple Ridge
11955 Haney Place,
Maple Ridge, B C V2X 6A9
''r L
July 29'.2009
The Maple Ridge -Pitt Meadows Terry Fox Run will be held on Sunday ,
September 13th. 2009 . The Run starts at 10.00 a.m. and the route starts and
finishes at Hammond Community Centre as in previous years.
I am enclosing RCMP approval of the route, the Certificate of Insurance and
a map of the route and we look forward to receiving approval from Council.
Sincerely,
e , L7i IQi
Betty Levens
#122 22611 116th. Ave.,
Maple Ridge, B C V2X OW7
Eo,14-11-1 r_C,3g]
terryfoxrun.org
FORM 'A'
Details of the Event Date::or 7
Contact Person:Zi 1 LE 1,/6NI!, Phoneb04-4_(7-93WFax 604-1,.67-9387
Details /ba 1 ����/ F"CiA 'RAA. n Le, _Add ., v)day
SepT,e /?1 i)f' 4 ) 317-2.• C
R,un stats and ttt is ho. -6 at` fl'am m �n d co m irui U f
SIC u �,t�►r�
71xsz amu. n star --s at /0.00 a •rt rand s over IV '10p , rA •
•
t d 1t- R4A/A
1 U-rn c.) 4 CTA,14ftQ Ur►' �`m _ tJ x i lit fl P. -EQ S trko a'w a411 Iztif
Q A4
1
1)
Sketch of Traffic Control Plan:
S.ei_ Q /1&(kQI n7 o f
RCMP concurrence for the proposed Traffic Control Plan , !03/746
The following agencies have been advised and acknowledge the event:
BC Transit
Fire Department
Ambulance Services
Other
6.115-s c.si 11 ;
atterson Ave
Cresca .
Stanton Ave
tg
e
tr,
oisfr
f ;' 1‹.J toueed Htvy ---..J
j
/ i -1 • 0
CM
_ iqA e, __ , .....�..:1P Aii$. �- .02 ___i
-;
,Wa!nuat `Crescent
!!
Dele Dr
a �
1 l°1
• ▪ m Thorte�▪ n Ave un 1 :-
cal •v
•
r
:115 A Arse
Fini-
116 Ave
.
•
fi'
ljesttield Aue _ �.
i
1
Hammond
Stadium"
19 Ave
Camvroc
McFai
Rd_
RIHammond___ J -
`Park
L1E-7 Efl
Tolmie Park
1km
5/10 km
o
a
Terry Fox Run
Hammond Community Centre
PURVES REDMOND
CLIENT FOCUSED RISK SOLUTIONS
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE (A)
THIS CERTIFICATE CONSTITUTES A STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AS OF THE DATE OF ISSUANCE AND ARE SO REPRESENTED AND WARRANTED ONLY TO 7HE
CERTIFICATE HOLDER; OTHER PERSONS RELYING ON THIS MEMORANDUM DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF
INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE
COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES LISTED BELOW.
INSURED
The Terry Fox Foundation
46167 Yale Road, Suite 303
Chilliwack, B.C.
V2P 2P2
Re: Evidence of Insurance - Terry Fox Run
CERTIFICATE HOLDER - Nome and Address
District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge, BC
V2X 6A9
Insurance as described herein has been arranged on behalf of the insured named herein under the following policy(ies) and as more fully described by
the terms, conditions, exclusions and provisions contained in the said policyCes) and any endorsements attached thereto.
COVERAGE
INSURER POLICY NO. EXPIRY DATE COMBINED BODILY INJURY &
PROPERTY DAMAGE
Commercial General Liability ING Insurance 501095221 October 31, 2007 55,000,000 each occurrence
Including: Cross Liability
Umbrella Liability ING Insurance 501113605 October 31, 2009 $10,000,000 excess of
55,000,000 underlying
Additional Insured and Cross Liability: It is hereby understood and agreed that the following are added as additional insureds but only with respect to
the above and arising out of the Named Insured's Operations. The policy limits are not increased by the addition of such Additional Insured and remain
as stated in this Certificate. Further, the policy shall apply to each Insured in the same manner and to the same extent as if a separate policy had been
issued to each.
Naming the Corporation as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially
altered without 30 days notice in writing to the Corporation.
Cancellation: Should any of the above described policies be changed, cancelled or amended restricting coverage before the expiration date
thereof, the issuing company will mail 30 (THIRTY) days written notice to the above named certificate holder.
Broker: Purves Redmond Limited
390 Bay Street, Ste. 800
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y2
Authorized Representative: Date: July 27 2009
PURVES REDM D DA TED
PER
MAPLE RIDGE
OriUsh Columbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: August 7, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: St. Patrick's School Walk-a-thon
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A request has been received from St. Patrick's School to use municipal streets for their annual Walk-
a-thon on Friday October 9, 2009, from 9:45 am to 1:00 pm. Participants will walk on sidewalks
and no road closures are required.
Authorization from Council is required in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By-
law 3136-1982" to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the St. Patrick's School Walk-a-thon on Friday
October 9, 2009, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule 'A' attached to the staff report
dated August 7, 2009 are met.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for
organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually
given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability for injury or
damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as
"Schedule A."
The Walk-a-thon participants are scheduled to leave the school at 9:45 am and return at
approximately 1:00 pm. Approximately 300 students and adults will be walking the route.
Participants will walk on sidewalks and there will be no road closures.
Participants will travel north on 227 Street to 128 Avenue, head east on 128 Avenue to 232
Street and head north on 232 Street to Maple Ridge Park. Participants will return using the
same route.
b) Strategic Alignment:
Permitting of Maple Ridge street events promotes community development and often
highlights Maple Ridge's natural and built features.
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets may cause some delays and inconveniences to other
road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the Walk-a-thon organizers.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
The road use permit establishes that the Walk-a-thon organizer must obtain the approval of
RCMP and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as
coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service).
e) Business Plan /Financial Implications:
The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal
streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff
processing effort.
f) Policy Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices.
g) Alternatives:
The District could refuse to permit the Walk-a-thon to occur. In this event, the organizer
would have to cancel the Walk-a-thon.
CONCLUSIONS:
From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events
and activities. The St. Patrick's School Walk-a-thon has been held in Maple Ridge for several years
without incident.
Approved by: Fr-'' k Qun, MBA, PEn
Genera j anage P •lic Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J . (Jim) Rule
hief Administrative Officer
Schedule `A' To Council Memorandum Dated August 7. 2009
St. Patrick's School Walk-a-thon
Conditions of Approval
Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers:
1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the
R.C.M.P., and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District);
2. notify local Fire Department, and Ambulance Services of the event;
3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses;
4. obtain any required permits from the District of Maple Ridge Parks and Leisure Services
Department for park facility use;
5. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of
the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date);
6. must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times.
7. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out
of or in any way connected with the event;
8. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability
insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST
have the following statement written in the policy:
"Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy
shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in
writing to the District."
Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy
shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the
Corporate Officer prior to the event; and
9. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which
existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction
of the District.
The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw permission to use
municipal streets for this and future events should the organizers fail to comply with the above
requirements.
Chief Administrative Officer
07/09/2009 23:24 6044672686
July 9, 2009
ST PATS SCHOOL PAGE 01/03
&. Patrick' School
Ms. Ruby Tam
Maple Ridge Engineering Dept.
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place,
Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9
13y fax to: 604-467-7425
22589 121st Avenue, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 3T5
Telephone: 604-467-1571 Fax: 604-467-2686
email: school@stpatsschool.org
Dear Ms. Tam,
St. Patricic's School requests permission to hold our annual Walk-a-thon on Friday,
October 9, 2009. We will leave the school at 9:45 am and return approximately at
1:00 pm. Approximately 250 students and 50 adults will walk the route. The
Wowing is the Walk-a-tbon route:
Walk along 227th Street north to 128th Ave.
Proceed along 128th, East to 232id Street
Turn on 232" Street to Maple Ridge Park
Return route th.e same.
Please find attached a Fax from Corporal Picrcchke giving permission as well as a
map of the route we will be walking. All other agencies in Maple Ridge will be
notified.
A. copy of our Certificate of Insurance will be forwarded at a later date when we
return on August 24, 2009.
Should you require any further information please let us know.
Sincerely,
frs. Irene Wihalc,
Principal
07/09/2009 23:24 6044672686 ST PATS SCHOOL
117.•11 r2I506 'I i:37 FA.Y. 604 467 71533 U1k R1.1)(3h tlEADIA1'.5
ammmem....
m...••••••••
0, fc1 LJ 416044672686
STPATRICKS
PAGE 03/03
igtiki (/0)4
PACE 03
(t Patrick Schaal thtkr) )
1
TO!
AV..
IIEMOCK
411.11BilV dU.
AF
e•••••••••1
•
itb
4.,
CLLE4179E
gt /'
, •
'••
Jo,
• ,.42:•"
•
07/09/2009 23:24 6644672686
0-7/97/2ooe 14:24 FA}( eo4 467 78r9
07/052009 21:21 5044672696
ST PATS SCHOOL
FRMP Ridge Moolows
ST PATS SCHOOL
PAGE 02/03
a OGI1/oo1
PAGE 01/01
egt. Patrick 6 6chool
22589121st AvenuR, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 3T5
Te1aphono: 004-467-1571 Fax: 804-467-29919
email: scho011Astpotoaahool.org
FAX COVER SHEET
DATC: July 6, 2009
TO. Corporal Pierschke
RIDGE -Meadows
MUNICIPAL TRAFFIC
PHONE! 467-7686
FAX: 467-7633
FROM: Mrs. Irene Wihak, Principal
PHONE: 467-1571
FAX; 4672886
R1E~; School Welk -e -then
Number of pages Including cover sheet: 1
/Massage
This is to advise that our school will be having a Welk.a-thou on Friday, October 9, 2009,
There will be approximately 250 - 300 children and adults.
W`e will not require any road closures. We will be walking on the sidewalk along 227th
Street North to 128th Avenue. We will proceed along 128th, East to 232nd Street. We
will tum on 232nd Street to Maple Ridge Park. Our route back will be the same. We will
be leaving the school at 9:46 am.
Our return from Maple Ridge Park will be at approx. 1:00 pm. The students are
accompanied by 16 staff members and approx. 30 to 40 parents. We also have parents
continuously drive the route to ensure the safety of the students,
Please sign off the es soon es possible so that we can notify Maple Ridge Engineering
Department.
Thank you.
R.C.M. POLICE
RIDGE -MEADOWS DETACHMENT
11990 HANEYPLACE,
MAPLE RIDGh, B.C. V2X Hie
PH: 604-463-6251
/kr-
MAPLE RIDGE
Br,tish CQLumbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: Aug. 12, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: T21-212-003
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN:
SUBJECT: Adjustments to 2009 Collector's Roll
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
BC Assessment has revised the assessed value for the 2009 Collector's Roll through the issuance of
Supplementary/PAAB Roll 05. The Collector is required to make all the necessary changes to the
municipal tax roll records and report these adjustments to Council.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
The report dated Aug. 12, 2009 is submitted for information.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Eleven folios were revised.
Six residential folios had the value of improvements removed as the houses were demolished prior
to Dec. 31, 2008, three residential folios, which had originally been assessed as land only, were
reassessed to reflect the fact that the homes on those properties were completed prior to Oct. 31,
2009. As well, a local church was granted an exemption for a portion of the improvements which
had been previously assessed as residential but were actually being used for worship. A local car
dealership appealed their assessment and it was agreed that the assessment would be reduced to
more accurately reflect actual value.
(Municipal tax changes: increase in residential class- $260; decrease in business class - $7,499)
b) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
There is a total decrease of $12,975 in tax revenue of which the municipal portion is $ 7,239.
1131
CONCLUSIONS:
We requested BC Assessment review their data in regards to several residential properties which
resulted in corrections increasing the residential assessment base by $72,900. An appeal to the
Property Assessment Appeal Board (PAAB) resulted in a decrease to the business class assessment
base of $638,000.
This report dated Aug. 12, 2009 is submitted for information and is available to the public.
Prepared by: Silvia Rutledge
Manager, Revenue & Collections
Approvddy: Paul Gill, B.BA.; C.G.A.
General Manager: Corps & Financial Services
Concurrence: IL. (Jim) Rule
thief Administrative Officer
I
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE: August 19, 2009
FILE NO:
ATTN: Committee of the Whole
Fee for Service Agreement - Tourism Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In January 2009 Council approved a three month Fee for Service agreement with Tourism Maple
Ridge and Pitt Meadows and authorized the Corporate Officer to execute up to two additional three
month contracts as required upon the recommendation of the Manager of Economic Development.
These extensions have been granted. Effective August 24, 2009 Ms. Kate Zanon officially begins her
new role as CEO Pitt Meadows Economic Development Corporation which includes responsibility for
Tourism. Accordingly the City of Pitt Meadows has extended their Fee for Service agreement with
Tourism Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows by the three months the required notice period pending the
establishment of the Pitt Meadows Economic Development Corporation, its Board of Directors and
development of a plan for delivery of their Tourism services. Maple Ridge Economic Development
staff discussed the impact to the Tourism Society agreement with Pitt Meadows staff; and it is
recommended that Maple Ridge renew its agreement accordingly.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the 2009 Tourism Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Fee for Service Agreement in the amount of
$8,750 for an annual total of $35,000 be extended to December 2009 and that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to execute the agreement.
DISCUSSION:
Background Context: The responsibility for Tourism in Pitt Meadows will move to the Pitt Meadows
Economic Development Corporation in the coming months. Pitt Meadows has therefore renewed the
Tourism Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Fee for Service Agreement for the three month notice period
outlined in the agreement.
The services provided by the Tourism Society today are primarily related to operation of the Visitor
Information Centre. The product development and marketing segments of the business require
specific expertise and resources to effectively develop and manage Tourism on an ongoing basis.
Desired Outcome(s): The desired outcome is uninterrupted delivery of tourism services through the
Visitor Information Centre so that there is no impact on service as Maple Ridge explores alternative
service delivery models (which could include partnering with the City of Pitt Meadows and the District
of Mission for a regional service delivery model).
1132
Strategic Alignment: Tourism is one of the four pillars identified by the Maple Ridge Economic
Development Commission in their Economic Strategy and in the Economic Development Business
Plan 2009 - 2013. The abundance of outdoor recreation opportunties and our vast range of
breathtaking outdoor scenery make Maple Ridge an ideal destination for tourists. Developing new
Tourism "product offerings" and marketing them is important to the economy of the region.
Citizen/Customer Implications: The Council of Tourism Associations (COTA) is the voice of the BC
tourism industry, representing BC's major organizations and businesses. COTA reports that Tourism
contributes $10 billion annually to the BC economy, and directly employs 118,000 workers. Maple
Ridge is well positioned to attract a share of this tourism investment. To focus our efforts Ridge
Meadows Parks and Leisure Services is developing a Sport and Eco Tourism Strategy in 2009 that
will identify specific opportunties for the consideration of both municipalities. The Tourism Society
actively participates in the Vancouver Coast and Mountains Tourism, "Scenic 7" regional campaign
that covers the "Mighty Fraser Country". www.scenic7BC.com
Not only does development of Tourism assets benefit tourists and the local economy, Maple Ridge
citizens will also be able to take advantage of new tourism opportunities as they develop.
Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The 2009 - 2013 Business Plan identified $35,000 to provide Visitor Information Services. To date
$26,250 has been executed, and a further $8,750 remains in the budget to cover the last quarter of
the year. To be consistent with the approach Pitt Meadows has taken we recommend extending the
contract a further three months at this time.
CONCLUSIONS:
Maple Ridge Economic Development will oversee the agreement and propose amendments during
the 2010 - 2014 Business Planning process. In the interim it is proposed that the Fee for Service
agreement three month agreement be extended to the end of December 2009 and that the
Corporate Officer be authorized to execute up to two additional three month contracts as required
upon the recommendation of the Manager of Economic Development.
Prepared by: Sandy Blue, ABC
Manager Economic Development
L„.
Approved by, Paul Gill, B.B.A, C.G.A, F r.M
General Manager: rpo to & Financial Services
C.. r�- _
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
SCB