Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-09-14 Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA September 14, 2009 1:00 p.m. Council Chamber Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more information or clarification before proceeding to Council. Note: If required, there will be a 15 -minute break at 3:00 p.m. Chair: Acting Mayor 1. DELEGAT/ONS/STAFFPRESENTAT/ONS- (10 minutes each) 1:00 p.m. 1.1 Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association, Ineke Boekhorst 2. PUBL/C WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERV/CES Note: Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications may be permitted to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes. Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda: 1101 RZ/002/08, 11580 223 Street, First Extension Staff report dated September 4, 2009 recommending that a one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/002/08 to permit an apartment building under the CRM (Commercial/Residential) zone. Committee of the Whole Agenda September 14, 2009 Page 2 of 3 1102 Louis Leather Shop 9th Annual Fundraising Event, Use of Streets Staff report dated August 28, 2009 recommending the use of municipal streets be authorized for the Louis Leather Shop 9th Annual Fundraising Event on Sunday, October 4, 2009. 3. FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERV/CES (including Fire and Police) 1131 Bylaw for Highway Closure & Dedication Removal for a Portion of 112th Avenue (23600 block) Staff report dated September 4, 2009 recommending that Maple Ridge Highway Closure and Dedication Removal Bylaw No. 6689-2009 to allow the closure of the highway and removal of the road dedication be given first, second and third readings. 1132 Disbursements for the month ended July 31, 2009 Staff report dated August 31, 2009 recommending that disbursements for July 2009 be approved. 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERV/CES 1151 5. CORRESPONDENCE 1171 6. OTHER ISSUES 1181 Committee of the Whole Agenda September 14, 2009 Page 3 of 3 7. ADJOURNMENT 8. COMMUNITY FORUM COMMUNITY FORUM The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the individual members of Council. The total time for this Forum is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a response will be given. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings and delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca Checked by: Date: MAPLE RIDGE British Ca[vrnbIa Deep Roots Greater Heights DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: September 4, 2009 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/002/08 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Rezoning - First Extension 11580 223 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant for the above noted file has applied for an extension to this rezoning application under Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. This application is to permit an apartment building under the CRM (Commercial/Residential) zone. RECOMMENDATION: That a one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/002/08 and that the following conditions be addressed prior to consideration of final reading: Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; ii. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; iii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; and iv. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking; DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Vincent Donegan AXXIA Management & Consuling Inc. (Vetta Enterprise) Legal Description: D.L.: 398, Plan: RP65880 OCP: Existing: Commercial Zoning: Existing: M-2 (General Industrial), RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: CRM (Commercial/Residential) 1 1101 Surrounding Uses North: South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Ministry of Transportation property and Single and Two Family Dwelling RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential), RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential) Regional Town Centre Commercial Single Family Dwellings and Commercial RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential), H-1 (Heritage Commercial), C-4 (Neighbourhood Public House Commercial) Regional Town Centre Commercial Ministry of Transportation property RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential), M-1 (Service Industrial) Regional Town Centre Commercial Single Family Dwellings and Townhomes RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential), RM -1 (Townhouse Residential) Regional Town Centre Commercial Vacant Apartment 0.200 HA (0.47 acres) 223 Street Full Urban DP/002/08 This application is to permit an apartment building within the CRM (Commercial/Residential) zone. The property will be subject to a Town Centre Development Permit. The purpose of the Regional Town Centre Development Permit to establish guidelines is to direct development in the Downtown to enhance business opportunities that contribute to community identity while meeting the needs of those who work, shop and live in the area. The following dates outline Council's consideration of the application and Bylaw 6617-2008 - The First Reading report (see attached) was considered on September 30, 2008; - First Reading was granted September 30, 2008 - Public Hearing was held October 21, 2008; - Second and Third reading was granted on October 28, 2008. Application Progress: Due to the changing economic conditions, the applicant has been delayed in the completion of their proposed project. The proponent is currently working on the civil drawings required for the Rezoning Servicing Agreement. -2 Alternatives: Council may choose one of the following alternatives: 1. grant the request for extension; 2. deny the request for extension; or 3. repeal third reading of the bylaw and refer the bylaw to Public Hearing. CONCLUSION: The applicant has been actively pursuing the completion of this rezoning application and has applied for a one year extension. It is anticipated that final consideration will be applied for in Spring 2010. Prepared by:r n Csikos j` annin• Technician ApproyOd by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.En:GM: ublic rks & Alof - - • •ment Services il Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer JC/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - First Reading report -3- MAPLE RIDGE �r�i •n 1..11;11. Deep Roots Greater Heights DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE /-ppeiic/i A TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: September 18, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/002/08 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6617-2008 11580 223 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from M-2 (General Industrial), RS - 1 (One Family Urban Residential) to CRM (Commercial/Residential), to permit an apartment building. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6617-2008 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; ii. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; iii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iv. Road dedication as required; v. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking; and vi. Registration of a LEED Covenant. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Vincent Donegan AXXIA Management & Consulting Inc Vetta Enterprise Legal Description: D.L.: 398, Plan: RP65880 OCP: Existing: Commercial Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses North: South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: M-2 (General Industrial), RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) CRM (Commercial/Residential) Ministry of Transportation property & Single and Two Family Dwelling RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential), RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential) Regional Town Centre Commercial Single Family Dwellings and Commercial RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential), H-1 (Heritage Commercial), C-4 (Neighbourhood Public House Commercial) Regional Town Centre Commercial Ministry of Transportation property RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential), M-1 (Service Industrial) Regional Town Centre Commercial Single Family Dwellings and Townhomes RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential), RM -1 (Townhouse Residential) Regional Town Centre Commercial Vacant Apartment 0.200 HA (0.47 acres) 223 Street Full Urban DP/002/08 Application RZ/002/08 proposes to rezone subject property located at 11580 223 Street from M-2 (General Industrial), RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) to CRM (Commercial/Residential). The rezoning is to support a 51 unit 4 storey apartment building with underground parking. The property is subject to both a Multi -Family Development Permit and a Regional Town Centre Development Permit. -2- c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The Official Community Plan designates the subject property Regional Town Centre Commercial. According to the Zoning Matrix in the Official Community Plan, the CRM (Commercial/Residential) zone is supported in areas designated Regional Town Centre Commercial. The Zoning Matrix also states that "Properties Designated Commercial and not identified as Ground Floor Commercial required on Schedule "G" of Zoning Bylaw 3510-1985 may align with zones within the Town Centre Residential land use category of this Matrix and in compliance with the Town Centre Concept Plan," The CRM (Commercial/Residential) zone aligns with zones within the Town Centre Residential land use category of the Zoning Matrix. The Official Community Plan also states the following policies: 3-22 Maple Ridge will place a priority on residential development within the Regional Town Centre and will increase the residential capacity of the Regional Town Centre by: a) Encouraging higher density residential development in appropriate locations; b) Reviewing bylaws and regulations to allow 100% residential development in selected areas of the Regional Town Centre; c) Promoting a variety of housing types and choices; and d) Encouraging mixed-use development where appropriate 3-23 In order to further the development of the Regional Town Centre in conjunction with community goals, Maple Ridge will engage in the preparation of an Area Plan. In the interim the Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan will be used as a guide for development. Opportunities to increase residential densities in the Regional Town Centre may be supported if the proposed development is consistent with adjacent land uses; and complies with the policy objectives in the Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan and Official Community Plan. The proposal offers an increase in the residential capacity of the Regional Town Centre and promotes a variety of housing types and choices as per policy 3-22. This area has not been identified as an area where mixed-use development is appropriate as per Schedule G of the Zoning Bylaw. Since the subject property is located within the Town Centre, the applicant has submitted a LEED checklist and is striving to achieve 18 points. Town Centre Concept Plan: The Regional Town Centre Concept Plan identifies the subject property as Mixed Use [1St floor commercial required]. However, under the proposed Town Centre Area Plan, the subject property is designated Port Haney Multi -Family, Commercial and Mix -Use. Therefore, the proposal complies with the anticipated designation under the Town Centre Area Plan. -3- Section 4.1.2 Heritage Area of the Town Centre Concept Plan, states that "policies and bylaws can be prepared to encourage the densification by locating new residents in the central area, while enabling the retention of existing, valuable buildings and the addition of infill buildings in character." Proposing to rezone the subject property to the CRM (Commercial/Residential) zone conforms to this section as it encourages densification and infill. Chapter 4 of the Concept Plan - Design Guidelines and Performance Standards - outlines the need to direct growth to the Town Centre, to aid in accommodating the 7,000 new dwelling units anticipated by 2021. This growth is expected to help revitalize the downtown areas and provide a supportive population base for local businesses and transit. It also identifies the need for greater diversity in the residential housing stock, to provide options for a variety of persons at different stages of life and with physical challenges. A range of housing types and sizes also provides more opportunities for rental housing and housing that may serve a variety of income levels and locate residents in close proximity to shops and services. The proposal aligns with the Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan in the following ways: • The Concept Plan recommends that building coverage for the sample apartment project is approximately 52% and the maximum building coverage should not exceed 60%. The lot coverage for the proposed building is 53.6%. • The Concept Plan recommends that in high density and mixed-use areas, 4 storey buildings are proposed in the short term. The proposed building is 4 storeys with exposed underground parking. • The proposed building has its primary facade facing public streets, which increases the feeling of safety and to create a pleasant, pedestrian -oriented atmosphere for residents, residential. • The building has been designed to facilitate "eyes on the street". Windows, doors, and patios, and balconies face the street to allow for residents to observe the activity in the area. Zoning Bylaw: The proposed apartment building complies with the setback and height requirements of the CRM (Commercial/Residential) zone. However, amendments to the CRM (Commercial/Residential) zone are required and they are as follows: 1. Section 5(a) of the CRM (Commercial/Residential) zone states "All building and structures shall not exceed a lot coverage of 90% reduced to 50% above the second storey". It is recommended that "reduced to 50% above the second storey" be deleted from this section. This amendment is supported because the requirement to reduce the site coverage above the second storey creates a stepping affect. This stepping affect does not support bringing buildings to the street front to create a stronger street presence and does not facilitate "eye on the street" security. -4- 2. Section 7(3) of the CRM (Commercial/Residential) zone states "For those Tots southwest of the Haney Bypass with a lot line alignment on 223rd Street of River Road shall provide a commercial use on the ground floor on that alignment. It is recommended that this section be deleted. This amendment is supported because the proposed Town Centre Area Plan supports Multi -Family Use as a principal use in this area. Development Permits: The property will be subject to a Multi -Family and a Regional Town Centre Development Permit. The purpose of the Multi -Family Development Permit is to enhance existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs and minimize potential conflicts on neighbouring land uses. The proposed 4 storey apartment has exposed underground parking, which is accessed through the rear lane. Due to the slope of the property a portion of the underground parking is exposed and retaining walls are required. The applicant has provided landscaping to screen the retaining walls and exposed parking. To ensure views are maintained, the applicant has proposed a flat roof rather than a hipped roof. The variation in the roof line also adds to the character of the building. The purpose of the Regional Town Centre Development Permit to establish guidelines is to direct development in the Downtown to enhance business opportunities that contribute to community identity while meeting the needs of those who work, shop and live in the area. The proposed apartment building adds to the housing variety in the area and can support local commercial businesses in the area. As this property is located within the Port Haney Area, the applicant has utilized colours and materials that are suitable for this heritage area. Advisory Design Panel: The applicant presented their proposal to the Advisory Design Panel on August. The resolution was as follows: That the application be accepted with the following considerations: • Stair location and configuration to be better integrated into the landscape. The stairs have been altered and blended into the landscaping. • Vehicular drop-off should be higher quality surface and integrated into the building entry The drop-off area will be surfaced with pavers. • Review of exterior materials to be simplified The materials and colours proposed are suitable for this heritage area. -5- • Proportion of the brackets to the facade The brackets have been enlarged to make them more proportionate to the building. • Treatment of railings on the building and the landscape The railings vary in height, which adds variety. Development Information Meeting: A development information meeting was held at the Best Western Hotel on September 4, 2008 at 7:30 pm. The applicant and the architect were present. One person attended the meeting. The comments received was "liked the building and in particular the roof lines." d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department The Engineering Department has reviewed the application and has provided comments, which include, but are not limited to the following comments: 1. Reconstruct the full -width lane carriageway to the standard 6 metre width and cross-section from 223 Street east across the site frontage. 2. Widen the east side of 223 Street Road to a collector standard from the lane north to the site drop-off access. 3. Relocated the 223 Street centre traffic line to the west to provide for the parking lane on the east side and the curb bulge at the 116 Avenue crosswalk. The parking lane will be time-limited and consistent with other streets in the area. 4. The proposed development will increase pedestrian activity at this area and these works will provide a pedestrian route to existing sidewalks on 223 Street and the Haney Bypass 5. The water system may require upgrading. The cost of the upgrades and the installation of the hydrant will be the responsibility of the applicant. 6. The applicant's engineer might determine that a statutory right-of-way if required in support of storm sewer servicing The above requirements will be part of the rezoning servicing agreement, which will be registered on title. CONCLUSION: The proposed CRM (Commercial/Residential) zone conforms to the land use designation in the Official Community Plan and the proposed Town Centre Area Plan. It is therefore recommended that application RZ/002/08 be favourably considered and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6617-2008 (Appendix B) be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing. -6- PlaFly g T chnician Il Approv II. ., P, MCIP rector of Planning . Approved by:rank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng /GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. L. (J ) " ule Chief • nistrative Officer Pti The fol;owing appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6617-2008 Appendix C - Site Plan Appendix D - Building Elevation Plans Appendix E - Landscape Plans Appendix F - LEEDS checklist -7- CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6617-2008 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6617-2008." 2. That Part 7, Section 706(5)(a) is amended by deleting the following: "reduced to 50% above the second storey" 3. That Part 7, Section 706(7)(3) is deleted. 4 That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Parcel "129", District Lot 389, Group 1, New Westminster District Reference Plan 65880 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No.1442 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to CRM (Commercial/Residential). 5. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 200 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 . MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER P 155 5 A P 76188 d N y CALLAGHAN AVE. EP 59768 7 Pcl. A r co mr 3 o_ a_ P 59018 0,2 3 116 AVE. 128 k LMS 752 4';-) 31 riz r 0Z 00/ A 80.5 -a 1 13 PA 14 RK CALLAGHAN AVE. 15 71557 14 11575 7 0 1-7 r) N N dem 284 CgNgo/qN Rem 1 3DY (SK 125) VAPLE Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: S p 6059748 A NAT. BDY (RP 7373) NAT. BDY (RP 5335) TGE ZO\E Av E\DI\G 6617-2008 1 442 RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) and M-2 (General Industrial) CRM (Commercial/Residential) MAPLE RIDGE BrIL .1i Colurn6,a 1:1500 1111 IIlhiI a, ) 141l 1 1 111W 1/0101! 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 1Q 0 a�- gulawripolinim 112 1ni,:liiliiliiuu[im��ni�.w n ��u�l,nee�m�lni, .lI oI u�1111111In!a In wniailN Deno'�k\ tone, nmcnl,iln�„,�o„nnlmivan�Iniliw_ wru uu —iio n`^auii,�c�� ..o�mr� iui nnii i� w yi i - aw. 109 `C r� .. iy •'• Zi ti• triE Jib iR f a N a 1 1Q 0 a�- gulawripolinim 112 1ni,:liiliiliiuu[im��ni�.w n ��u�l,nee�m�lni, .lI oI u�1111111In!a In wniailN Deno'�k\ tone, nmcnl,iln�„,�o„nnlmivan�Iniliw_ wru uu —iio n`^auii,�c�� ..o�mr� iui nnii i� w yi i - aw. 109 `C r� .. iy •'• Zi ti• z te 11 1LSi! 3141011111111a eece 1 PiaWI 41 d I ii I it id 111 HI - I� le ell ill PP it IN iff I (DO 0 0 0 0 0 © O F + _: q{ r — .I ` I i i L 11 ` IL � r ei sE� g— nor_ 1111: 1 11111 I ruirmor k ! i MI-l�°911i ..1 [11[1111F 1-1.'M._ ‘11,i01 lam'_= ill :1 - dill ,1,...11M.,- lil NMI i Ell ; ;1 11 I I is 7.1r1 IF"it! 4j. Ili l �lll�]P E s 1 :1 1 I: ,: 11 1111/111 = rr,==_17,,71,,,,,.I.f-- 11 _■ MI_ Ii lam- I r `'rial' I 1 1lIDii I �1i111i1, ",i 1'• 1 111 Il l 1ECM I�f I _z 11 � ..r El - 11' 9 - g71111_AI - . III - __1 dicluL 1 fi=1i_ i ,..., t: J+% fry J. Y! E V tl ij 1 00 0 1 rdroroill� !-f Pi l I'k �j ill 11 ,rtis } 1 1 1 1 e 0 ® © ©O ® e 1Ieli81II11 ifl .1! * NE ■ $ M• i =!I! 's11 II PM ivlIiP:.ij� c, 11111111 Ili 6IIIIIMP, .+';?. 1IIIVf11VVVIVIIVVI1 !. 1191. ' PM 11 IE. V 11 I La 112. ii All ,-_ -d1 ... �'i ill ` _ II!' i1 l l 110. `11 :�11 i, 3 i::i4 E 1 �j 11911llLI1 s• all. !ii�I 1 ."- ,Ii IIIA L + :`: �1s1' 8:':: FFFFFFFI[:_. ' • . Ii ut A ii WE Zm r 1 d� 11 1 I 1 i I 1 11 i'4''1'I iI 'I II 'It S .1111 milli 11111111111 Mk' Ii;? W 41 F t d� 11 1 I 1 i I 1 11 i'4''1'I iI 'I II 'It S .1111 milli 11111111111 6 J U a $ a , IL y }ii •tm r3] lad �f )1�1 �.R Ochi Air 0 11 B 1 i TI ! :Nip! fi "" 111 Y 'lir s t; {f pp &i ORE OH 1 F ! pi i' I i f€ s f#1 ei ids m FL I 01 „1ro ill !' 11911H€ii! 4 MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: August 28, 2009 and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Louis Leather Shop 9th Annual Fundraising Event EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request has been received from Louis Leather Shop to use municipal streets for their 9th Annual Fundraising Event on Sunday October 4, 2009 between 10:00 am and 5:00 pm. This year's event is in support of the Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation. Authorization from Council is required in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By- law 3136-1982" to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge. RECOMMENDATION: THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for Louis Leather Shop 9th Annual Fundraising Event on Sunday October 4, 2009, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule 'A', attached to the staff report dated August 28, 2009 are met. DISCUSSION: a) Background: From time to time the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability for injury or damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as "Schedule A". Louis Leather Shop is requesting permission to use municipal streets on Sunday October 4, 2009 for their 9th Annual Fundraising Event. The event will take place on Fraser Street and would require that Fraser Street be closed to vehicle traffic from Lougheed Highway to North Avenue from 10:00 am to 5:00 pm. b) Strategic Plan: Permitting of Maple Ridge street events promotes community development and often highlights Maple Ridge's natural and built features. 1102 c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Permission to use municipal streets may cause some delays and inconveniences to other road users. However, the event organizers will provide traffic control. In addition, the organizers will be distributing an information letter to affected businesses and residents. d) Interdepartmental Implications: The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP, for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as Coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service). e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. f) Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices. g) Alternatives: The District could refuse to permit the event to occur. In this event, the organizer would have to cancel the event. CONCLUSIONS: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events and activities. Louis' Leather Shop Fundraising Event was held in Maple Ridge last year without incident. Submitted by: PhD., PEng. neer Approved by: ank Quinn, MBA, PEng. GenerV.,Manager: Public Works & Development Services _ Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief A5iministrative Officer AW/mi Schedule `A' To Council Memorandum Dated August 28. 2009 Louis' Leather Shop 9th Annual Fundraising Event Condition of Approval Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers: 1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the R.C.M.P., and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District); 2. notify local Fire Department, and Ambulance Services of the event; 3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; 4. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date); 5. notify surrounding businesses of pending road closures, by letter provided by the District of Maple Ridge on behalf of the organizer; 6. must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times; 7. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any way connected with the event; 8. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District." Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; and 9. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the District. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw permission to use municipal streets for this and future events should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements. Chief Administrative Officer FORM 'A' Details of the Event Date:: 4G/C.-4,57- 1 Z 7,-)02 Contact Person: 0 vi.S di -i t cl Phone % Z Fax 6oY- 16,3"--- Z6 715 Details: ki) AU( o G.a: i1„) 1N )C-( dt9isr/ tkc- y64( Lew #2 FUrt IY]APLG- Q& /Yc,S tio&E7 4.- /Sr; L)fr// /C6,7,&€ ith(d '/ / s9 GCs 0, ,9 G ui (;c,l 0 f .S(C.0 eel t 4..Jd o d /O i r?l -5 = (2^— • Vic:- br ?o / Sketch of Traffic Control Plan: 06'f void-ot 018464- c2:7---- V o k) (4/4 7 577( C J I pi(' ,t j \„,)) ‘\iPtc' 1- ipt)(-1[fir" 1.6( 1 f �(1-P RCMP concurrence for the proposed Traffic Control Plan Qd/✓' The following agencies have been advised and acknowledge the event; BC Transit Fire Department Ambulance Services Other Sgt. R. PIERSCHKE NCO i/c Traffic Ridge - Meadows Det. 22friSTri 1\iem r �. „ W 1; FAS f -r ,114.i 0� Witt 4-F-- TtfrPIFIftr 0 , `FR r.. !a W ' or 1 -J • 7 'Fft - 'LANE •224 ST 1- "� --74- • A, r rli w ir.. .w� FRASER TT ,T Q Q 0 0 J RIVERSILAKES W z C O w VI U7 W z cc w JO cc < QW 1- cc U J F M -J8 > u 0 20<UJ.a. Lfl 00 O N N cn MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: Sept. 4, 2009 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C.O.W. SUBJECT: Bylaw for Highway Closure & Dedication Removal for a Portion of 112th Avenue (23600 block) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: At the Closed Council meeting of August 31, 2009, Council agreed to the terms for the disposition of a 0.61 acre area of the undeveloped portion of 112 Avenue (outlined in bold and shown as Pcl 'A' and Pcl 'B' on the attached plan). This portion of road borders the south side of the property at 11224 236 Street and the owners of that property wish to incorporate it into a proposed residential development on their property. In order to sell the subject property, Council would first have to pass the attached bylaw closing the highway and removing the road dedication. At that point, the District would take ownership, in title, and could dispose of the property as allowed under the Community Charter. RECOMMENDATION(S): That Maple Ridge Highway Closure and Dedication Removal By-law No. 6689-2009 be read a first, second and third time. DISCUSSION: a), Background Context: The attached advisory from the Government of British Columbia, titled "Highway Closure and Removal of Highway Dedication", describes the process as required under the Community Charter. Upon approval of the above recommendation, staff will provide public notice of the highway closure and road dedication removal in the local newspaper, in accordance with Section 94 of the Community Charter. Persons affected by the bylaw will be given an opportunity to submit written responses to the Corporate Officer for Council consideration before final reading. Operators of utilities would not be affected by the closure and no property owner will be deprived of access to his property. The closed portion of highway is intended to be consolidated into a residential development on the neighbouring property at 11224 236 Street. 1131 b) Interdepartmental Implications: The Property Management Committee and the Planning and Engineering Departments support the highway closure and dedication removal. Prepared by: Ron Riach Property & Risk Manager Appro d 6y: } Paul Gill General Manager - C►rporate & Financial Services Concurrelce: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6689 - 2009 A Bylaw for highway closure and dedication removal within the Municipality. WHEREAS Council may, in the same bylaw, close all or part of a highway and remove the dedication of a highway; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Highway Closure and Dedication Removal Bylaw No. 6689 - 2009". Attached hereto and forming part of this Bylaw is a copy of Reference Plan dated August 11, 2009 and prepared by Mike Bernemann, a B.C. Land Surveyor, and marked as Schedule "A". 3. That portion of public highway comprised of 0.206ha identified as Pcl 'A' and 407m2 identified as Pcl `B' and outlined in heavy black line on the aforementioned described Reference Plan is hereby declared stopped and closed to public traffic and shall cease forever to be public highway. 4. The portion of the public highway outlined in heavy black line on the Plan attached to and made part of this Bylaw has its dedication as a highway removed. 5. Council shall, before adopting this Bylaw, cause Public Notice of its intention to do so to be given by advertisement once each week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper published or circulating in the District of Maple Ridge. READ a first time the day of , 2009 READ a second time the day of , 2009 READ a third time the day of , 2009 RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of Attachment: Schedule "A" ,2009 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Schedule "A" t• a 1 236A Street 112A Avenue 1 E 9 \Lfrll wL 236th Street na'b, 2r� 1 • ti Street czqi Book Of Reference 1 a A a c 5 1 2 LGD: Highway Closure and Removal of Highway Dedication Page 1 of 5 •rzfinistry Home Community Charter •Government of British Columbia Ministry of Community & Rural Development The Minister News Search Reports & Publications Contacts Wireless LGD Home > ... > Governance & Structure > Community Charter > Service & Regulatory Powers > Highway Closure Governance & Structure Division Search this site Subjects ■ Business Improvement Areas Boundary Extensions Board of Examiners Community Charter Elections First Nations Free Crown Grants Improvement Districts Local Government Restructure Maps Municipal Incorporation Municipal Restructure Resort Municipality Initiative Restructure Program Voting Strength West Nile Virus Divisions Branches Advisory Services Community Development First Nations Relations Program Local Government Structure Directories Department Publications Division Publications Links ICiviclnfo EC Thursday, September 3, 2009 Highway Closure & Removal of Highway Dedication Prior to the Community Charter municipalities had right of possession of local highways but ownership was in the name of the province. The Community Charter gives municipalities ownership of most municipal highways (exceptions are listed in s. 35(2)). Municipalities also have authority to regulate and prohibit in relation to highways, (subject to provincial legislation) and the authority to close highways. Since municipalities now own local highways (subject to the provincial right of resumption), provisions have been established if a municipality wants to use a portion of the highway for a different purpose, or if it wants to dispose of it. All of these provisions can be found in Part 3, Division 5 of the Community Charter. What is required 1. Highway Closure and Removal of Highway Dedication Municipalities can close a highway and remove its highway dedication by bylaw. These actions can be done either in one bylaw, or by separate bylaws. The bylaw(s) must include a reference plan or explanatory plan outlining the portion of road that will be affected. If done separately, the bylaws can be passed concurrently, or at different times. Prior to adopting a highway closure bylaw, a municipality must: • provide public notice in accordance with section 94; • provide an opportunity for persons who are affected by the bylaw to make representations to council; • deliver notice of its intention to close a highway to operators of utilities whose works council considers will be affected by the closure. The operator of a utility affected by a closure may require the municipality to provide reasonable accommodation of the utility's works. If the municipality and utility are unable to reach an agreement the matter may be settled by arbitration under the Commercial Arbitration Act; • ensure that a proposed highway closure does not completely deprive an owner of access to his/her property unless the municipality receives consent from the property owner or compensates the owner and provides alternative access; • refer any highway closure bylaws to the Minister of Transportation (through the local Ministry of Transportation District office) for approval where the proposed highway closure is within 800 metres of an arterial highway (note that specified District staff may grant such approval on behalf of the Minister of Transportation). Prior to adopting a highway dedication removal bylaw, a municipality must: • provide public notice in accordance with section 94; • provide an opportunity for persons who are affected by the bylaw to make representations to council; http://www.cd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/gov structure/community charter/services regulatory/highway closure.htm 03/09/2009 LGD: Highway Closure and Removal of Highway Dedication Page 2 of 5 GFOA Legislation LGMA MFA U CM • obtain consent of the owner of property if the highway in question is part of a subdivision, where the highway has not been developed and the owner of the land who created the subdivision continues to own all the parcels. Circumstances in which these conditions apply are rare. Top 2. Raising Title Once the highway closure bylaw and removal of highway dedication bylaw are adopted, and the removal of highway dedication bylaw is filed in the appropriate Land Title Office, the property ceases to be a highway, its dedication as a highway is cancelled and title to the property will be registered in the name of the municipality, in accordance with section 120 of the Land Title Act. In order for title to be raised in the name of the municipality, the Land Title Office requires that municipalities submit the bylaw and plan package to the registrar, together with an application in Form 17, a Property Transfer Tax form and the prescribed fee. As raising title and disposing of the land may occur in close conjunction, note also the Land Title Office filing requirements discussed under Disposing of Property. 3. Disposing of Property Once title is raised, municipalities who want to dispose of the property must do so in accordance with the property disposal rules set out in Part 34 Division 3 of the Community Charter. If a municipality plans to dispose of property for a closed highway that removes public access to a body of water, it must either provide alternative public access to the same body of water, or set aside money in a reserve fund to acquire property that will provide public access to the same body of water. The Community Charter provides a provincial right to resume property that was once a highway for the purpose of: an arterial highway; other transportation purposes; or a park, conservancy, recreation area, ecological reserve or other area established under the Park Act, the Ecological Reserve Act, the Protected Areas of British Columbia Act or the Environment and Land Use Act. The right of resumption can be removed by order of the Minister of Transportation. Alternatively, the Minister of Transportation can by regulation set out the circumstances in which the right is automatically removed. Top The Minister of Transportation has adopted a regulation (BC Req 245/2004 L (12 KB)) that provides that the right of resumption is automatically removed if the corporate officer of the relevant municipality files with the Land Title Office a statement certifying the following 3 facts: • the municipality has, by bylaw, closed the highway and removed its dedication; • the closed highway is not adjacent to a park, conservancy, recreation area, ecological reserve or other area established under the Park Act, the Ecological Reserve Act, the Protected Areas of British Columbia Act or the Environment and Land Use Act; and • the closed highway land is to be disposed of for either of the following two purposes: o in exchange for land necessary for the purpose of improving, widening, straightening, relocating or diverting a highway, or o to one or more adjacent land owners for the purpose of consolidating it with the landowners' existing adjacent parcel or parcels of land. The certifying statement must be satisfactory to the Land Title Office. http://www.cd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/gov structure/community charter/services regulatory/highway_closure.htm 03/09/2009 LGD: Highway Closure and Removal of Highway Dedication Page 3 of 5 Typically, this means a written statement from the municipality that: identifies the closed highway land; states the 3 conditions in the regulation; certifies that the land at issue satisfies those conditions and therefore the right of resumption is to be removed; is signed by the corporate officer; and is accompanied by the prescribed Land Title Office fee. Under this regulation, if the closed highway land satisfies the regulation - in other words, if the corporate officer of the municipality can certify that the transaction meets the circumstances set out in the regulation - then the municipality does not need a specific order removing the right of resumption. Instead, the right of resumption is automatically removed on the date that the certifying statement is filed in the Land Title Office. Top As noted, the municipality is responsible for satisfying itself that the 3 conditions in the regulation are met. This means the municipality is responsible for confirming the boundaries of the road in question and, in relation to the second condition (parks/conservancy), is responsible for confirming those boundaries relative to the boundaries of provincial parks/conservancy. To assist in determining the location of a road relative to provincial parks/conservancy, a municipality can obtain a list of provincial parks/protected areas in its region from the appropriate regional office of the Ministry of Environment: Cariboo (250) 398-4530 Kootenay (250) 354-6333 Lower Mainland (604) 582-5200 Okanagan (250) 490-8200 Omineca (250) 614-9911 Peace (250) 787-3295 Skeena (250) 847-7260 Thompson (250) 371-6200 Vancouver Island (250) 751-3100 Only if the municipality has confirmed that the road in question is in fact adjacent to a provincial park/conservancy would the municipality need to contact the Ministry of Environment regional planner to identify if there are any issues with the proposed disposal of the closed road. In that case, the matter would not be within the circumstances set out in the regulation. For any situations not covered by the regulation, a municipality will still need to seek a possible order from the Minister of Transportation to remove the right of resumption. In that case, municipalities should contact: Kirk Rockerbie Manager, Transportation Policy Branch Ministry of Transportation Phone: (250) 953-3068 E-mail: Kirk.Rockerbie@gov.bc.ca Top When to consider Municipal ownership and regulation of highways ensures that municipalities can manage their highways in a way that meets the needs of their communities. As well, it provides control over a land resource. Councils may want to consider closing a highway and removing the highway dedication as part of a major community redevelopment, as a rationalization of their road network system, or as http://www.cd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/govstructure/community charter/services regulatory/highway closure.htm 03/09/2009 LGD: Highway Closure and Removal of Highway Dedication Page 4 of 5 a way to remove unused highways from their land bank and generate revenue or create a park. What to consider Councils may want to consider the following, particularly before undertaking a highway closure, where the tangible impact on the community and its residents is felt: • In what circumstances does council want to close a highway, remove the highway dedication and dispose of the property? Does council deal with requests on an ad hoc basis or in the context of a policy for closing of roads and disposing of property? Does council have a narrow policy (e.g. disposal only for consolidation with adjacent parcels) or broad policy (e.g. part of P3) for dealing with property disposal of former highways? Councils have broad authority to dispose of property in any way that best meets then needs of their communities (see Property Disposal). In many cases councils will want to provide the property of a former highway to the adjacent parcel owner so the parcels can be consolidated. In other circumstances councils may consider a policy of disposing highways as part of larger community redevelopments or for community purposes such as parks, squares or affordable housing. Councils will want to consider that any property made available is done so through a consistent process and provides equal opportunity for individuals to purchase. In those circumstances where a council is only making the land available to one purchaser, they must be aware that if the land is being provided for purchase at less than fair market value this is a form of assistance and for business this can only be done in the context of a partnering agreement. • Does council want to close a highway and remove highway dedication as one process or as separate processes? Most councils undertake highway closures because they intend to dispose of the property. If this is the case, it is appropriate to deal with the closure and removal of highway dedication together. However, if a council believes there may be the possibility of reusing the closed highway in the future for highway purposes, it should consider just closing the highway. If the intended closure may only be short term, council might want to use its temporary highway closure authority under section 38, rather than the permanent closure process. • What kind of notice should council give? Where councils pass concurrent highway closure and removal of highway dedication bylaws they can combine the notice and opportunities to make representations requirements. Section 94 sets out the requirements for public notice. Notice must be published in a newspaper and posted in the public notice posting places. If there is likely to be considerable local concern about closing a highway, the municipality may want to consider providing additional notice to residents or a public information session. Municipalities must provide an opportunity for the public to make representations to council. The form this representation takes is at the discretion of the municipality as the legislation is silent on this matter. Whatever form is selected should be clearly advertised in notice provided to the community. Councils may want to develop a policy around what form of http://www.cd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/govstructure/community_ charter/services regulatory/highwayclosure.htm 03/09/2009 LGD: Highway Closure and Removal of Highway Dedication Page 5 of 5 representation is appropriate for their community. In developing such a policy, councils will want to consider the principles of fairness and equity. Every citizen and interest group should be given the same opportunity to make representations to council on a particular matter or issue. However, there is flexibility to provide different types of opportunities for representation for the different items that are set out in the Community Charter (e.g. for highway closure versus for a business regulation bylaw). • Where a municipality closes off access to a body of water, what is considered public access that is of at least equal benefit to the public? The legislation is silent on what constitutes property that provides public access to the same body of water that is of at least equal benefit to the public. Council has discretion to define what this is. The Land Title Act mandates that subdivision of water lots provides public access at regular intervals. Decisions on closure of access to water are best made in the context of the official community plan which establishes objectives and policies for parks and open space. The closure provision provides the option for consolidating access points to create the best opportunities for the public. Because citizens value the ability to access bodies of water, councils should first consider carefully the decision to close access. In situations like this councils may want to consider providing additional notice of the plan as there may be a general impact on the community for this type of closure. It may be difficult to find alternative access that is acceptable to citizens who are most likely to be impacted by a new public access location or that is affordable for a municipality, as it will be responsible for maintaining the access. • What procedures does council follow when undertaking a highway exchange? Highway exchanges are most commonly used where municipalities undertake a community development that requires reconfiguration of the highway network system. Developers provide land for a new highway dedication in exchange for a property elsewhere that has had the highway dedication removed. Municipalities undertaking highway exchanges will need to undertake the process required to pass the necessary bylaws that close and remove the highway dedication and dispose of the property. Property owners dedicating their land as highway will need to do so through subdivision. Timing of these processes may be an important consideration. Please direct questions or comments to Advisory Services. *Top •Capyrighl •Distiaimor •privacy •Feedback http://www.cd.aov.bc.ca/lad/aov structure/community charter/services regulatory/highway closure.htm 03/09/2009 MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: August 31, 2009 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Disbursements for the month ended July 31, 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council has authorized all voucher payments to be approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor, together with the Director of Finance. Council authorizes the vouchers for the following period through Council resolution. The disbursement summary for the past period is attached for your information. Expenditure details are available to any Council member for review in the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION: That the "disbursements as listed below for the month ended July 31, 2009 now be approved". GENERAL $29,278,551 PAYROLL $ 2,233,382 PURCHASE CARD $ 110,160 131,B22,093 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan. b) Community Communications: The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial disbursements. 1132 c) Business Plan / Financial Implications: Highlights of larger items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution • Coral Engineering Ltd - Leisure Centre heat recovery solution $ 189,000 • Da-Mazz Games Inc. - Tax sale refund $ 262,564 • Directional Mining & Drilling - Academy Park sanitary sewer system $ 185,840 • Double M Excavating - Roadworks 240 Street $ 316,437 • Emergency Communications - Dispatch levy - 3rd quarter $ 276,189 • G.V. Water District - water consumption Apr 1/09 - May 5/09 $ 416,193 • Imperial Paving - 2009 paving program $ 435,119 • Mierau - Fire Hall No. 1 expansion $ 646,069 • The municipality acts as the collection agency for other levels of government or agencies. The following collections were remitted in July. 1. BC Assessment Authority $ 880,666 2. City of Pitt Meadows $ 118,894 3. Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage $ 175,455 4. Provincial School Tax $ 15,514,137 5. South Coast BC Transportation $ 5,588,153 6. Tretheway Edge Dyking District $ 37,295 d) Policy Implications: Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice. CONCLUSIONS: The disbursements for the month ended July 31, 2009 have been reviewed and are in order. Prepared by: G'Ann Rygg Accounting Clerk II Approved by: or Thompson, CGA Manager of Financial Planning Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, C A GM- Corpora&,Financial - i+es Concurrence: J.L. (Jm) Rule Chief Administrative Officer gmr VENDOR NAME Associated Engineering(BC) Ltd Bank Of Nova Scotia -Maple Ridge BC Assessment Authority BC Hydro BC Institute Of Technology BC SPCA Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd CUPE Local 622 Carter Pontiac Buick Ltd Chevron Canada Ltd City Of Pitt Meadows Concordia Homes Ltd Co -Pilot Industries Coral Engineering Limited Da-Mazz Games Inc Directional Mining & Drilling Dixon Networks Corporation Double M Excavating Ltd Downtown Maple Ridge Business DTM Systems Corporation Emergency Communications Farm Tek Turf Services Inc Firestorm Suppression Services Fitness Edge Golder & Associates Gr Vanc Sewerage & Drainage Graham Hoffart Mathiasen Archt Greater Vanc Water District Green Cut Contracting Guest Excavating Company Ltd Guillevin International Inc Happy Heart Fitness & Educ Harvard Industries Ltd Hi -Grove Holdings Ltd CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - JULY 2009 DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT Kanaka Creek Bridge Tax refunds 2009 requisition Hydro charges July Leadership courses Contract July Maintenance: Albion Park Banners Camera repairs Cliff Park Greg Moore Youth Centre Hanging Baskets McNutt Reservior Overhead signs Pedestrian signs Speed signs Spirit Square Street light repairs Dues - pay periods 09/14 & 09/15 GMC Truck Fuel Dyking District 2009 collections 2008 RCMP cost share Security refund Tandem dump rentals Leisure Centre heat recovery solution Tax sale refund Academy Park sanitary sewer system Fibre optic conduit installation Roadworks 240 Street Fibre optic conduit installation Barnsdale St. sanitary sewer extension 50% BIA funding Citrix XenApp computer hardware & software Dispatch levy - 3rd quarter Sand application for parks Wildfire protection equipment Fitness classes & programs Geotechnical design of storm sewer along River Road DCC collection Jan-Jun'09 Waste disposal Fire Hall No. 1 expansion Water consumption Apr 1/09 - May 5/09 Grass cutting Sliver Ridge weeding project 150 watermain @ Lorne Street Fire fighters' equipment Fire fighters' protective wear Fire Truck equipment Operations electrical supplies Weight room supervision & childcare activity room St. Andrew's Heritage Hall Inspection fee refund 4,791 1,500 579 66 100 694 6,505 2,001 287 1,075 451 1,655 118,894 81,121 316,437 110,448 31,650 175,455 1,001 21,058 14,385 64,841 4,308 22,328 3,117 AMOUNT 72,638 21,091 880,666 20,275 16,059 22,343 19,704 22,385 20,271 51,361 200,015 21,750 31,938 189,000 262,564 185,840 42,336 458,535 78,500 48,162 276,189 42,054 31,672 15,266 17,257 176,456 78,021 416,193 35,443 15,682 94,594 27,677 28,866 22,368 Hub Fire Engines And Equipment Imperial Paving Interprovincial Traffic Sery KD Ventures Kosaka, Jack Mainland Civil Works Inc Maple Plaza Ltd Maple Ridge Historical Society MR -PM Disability Games 2009 Medical Services Plan Metro Motors Ltd Mierau Minister Of Provincial Revenue Morrison Hershfield Limited Morrow Bioscience Ltd Municipal Pension Plan BC Pitt Meadows Heritage & Museum Receiver. General For Canada Remdal Painting & Restoration RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ridge Meadow Comm Arts Council Ridge Meadows Seniors Society Ridgemeadows Recycling Society Scottish Line Painting Ltd South Coast BC Transportation Surrey Fire Service Tag Construction Ltd Terasen Gas Tretheway Edge Dyking District Vancouver Economic Development Warrington PCI Management Wedler Engineering Wilco Landscape Westcoast Inc Workers Compensation Board BC Young, Anderson - Barristers Fire truck equipment 2009 paving program Traffic signals Security refund Security refund Lougheed Highway improvements Tax refund Quarterly fee for service payment Staffing support Promotional pins Donations received by the District Employee medical & health premiums 3- Ford Escape Hybrid 1- Ford F250 Pick Up Fire Hall No. 1 expansion School tax remittance RCMP jail cell Leaf Statue 2009 West Nile virus program Pension remittance Semi-annual fee for service Employer/Employee remit PP09/14&15 Painting: Bandstand Fairground Hammond Community Centre Hammond Pool Pitt Meadows Family Rec Centre Pitt Meadows Museum Randy Herman Building The Act Ice rental June Art Centre grant July Catering Quarterly operating grant Jul - Oct Monthly contract for recycling July Weekly recycling Litter pick-up contract Honorarium Apartment tote liners Bike lanes Centre line program 2009 Pavement marking maintenance Traffic control devices 2009 requisition 2008 Dispatch operating charges - Fire Dept. 2008 Dispatch operating charges - Public works Brown Avenue extension Natural gas July 2009 collections MVC Membership 2009 Advance for Tower common costs July Tower expenses June 256 Street Sanitary Extension Sanitary Lift Station Merkley Park/MRSS track project Employer/Employee remittance 1st qtr 2009 Professional fees June 11,000 101 11;400 111,646 37,215 13,230 2,993 3,345 790 4,384 5,656 337 1,550 279 186 42,796 626 77,398 290 1,848 100 10,471 15,251 24,922 5,277 810 69,074 10,930 50,000 3,445 59,375 1,995 23,314 435,119 20,431 21,875 15,050 55,911 21,096 27,000 22,501 24,756 148,861 646,069 15,514,137 16,223 17,131 269,077 35,650 598,783 16,527 60,057 43,422 38,827 90,107 46,260 5,588,153 80,004 93,192 20,985 37,295 21,000 53,445 61,370 16,043 121,415 44,894 Disbursements In Excess $15,000 Disbursements Under $15,000 Total Payee Disbursements Payroll Purchase Cards - Payment PP09/14, 09/15 & 09/16 28,289,149 989,402 29,278,551 2,233,382 110,160 Total Disbursements June 2009 31,622,093 GMR V:\Finance\Accounting\AP Remittances (Disbursements)\2009\[Monthly Council Report 2009.xls)1UL'09