HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-11-16 Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
November 16, 2009
1:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting
takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to
Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more
information or clarification before proceeding to Council.
Note: If required, there will be a 15 -minute break at 3:00 p.m.
Chair: Acting Mayor
1. DELEGAT/ONS/STAFFPRESENTAT/ONS- (10 minutes each)
1:00 p.m.
1.1
2. PUBL/C WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERV/CES
Note: Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications may be permitted
to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes.
Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council
Agenda:
1101 RZ/040/09, 24554 102 Avenue (Lower Jackson Farm) & Lot A LMP 42378 at
100 Avenue and 248 Street (Upper Jackson Farm), Application to Metro
Vancouver Regional District to Amend Regional Context Statement
Staff report dated November 9, 2009 recommending that Metro Vancouver
be requested to accept an amendment to the Regional Context Statement
and to the land use designation as in the Official Community Plan.
Committee of the Whole Agenda
November 16, 2009
Page 2 of 4
1102 RZ/044/09, 11213, 11247, 11263, 11299 and 11333 240 Street, RS -3 to
C-1 and RM -1
Staff report dated November 10, 2009 recommending that Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6684-2009 and Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6685 to permit the construction of a commercial/
mixed use building and 165 townhouses be given first reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing.
1103 AL/060/09, 23589 and 23571 Lougheed Highway
Staff report dated November 9, 2009 requesting direction to staff whether
application AL/060/09 to exclude 3.5 hectares (8.9 acres) of land from the
Agricultural Land Reserve should or should not go forward to the Agricultural
Land Commission ("ALC") and recommending that the application not be
forwarded to the ALC.
1104 DP/DVP/058/09, 20611 Lougheed Highway
Staff report dated November 4, 2009 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/058/09 to vary the height of a
front entry element and further that the Corporate Officer be authorized to
sign and seal DP/058/09 in support of a renovation and expansion of the
Honda dealership building.
1105 DVP/037/08, 24369 126 Avenue
Staff report dated November 6, 2009 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/037/08 to reduce minimum lot
width and to vary road carriageway width.
1106 Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park
Staff report dated November 2, 2009 recommending that the use of
municipal streets be authorized for the annual Santa Clause Parade and
Christmas Festival in the Park on Saturday, December 5, 2009.
1107 Bicycle Advisory Committee Bylaw No. 6682-2009
Staff report dated October 7, 2009 recommending that the Bicycle Advisory
Committee Bylaw No. 6682-2009 to include an additional citizen at large
representative for the City of Pitt Meadows be given first, second and third
readings.
Committee of the Whole Agenda
November 16, 2009
Page 3 of 4
3. FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERV/CES (including Fire and Police)
1131 Development Cost Charges Imposition Amending Bylaw No. 6750-2009
Staff report dated October 29, 2009 recommending that Maple Ridge
Development Cost Charges Imposition Amending Bylaw No. 6750-2009 to
amend development cost charges be given first, second and third readings.
1132 Adjustments to 2009 Collector's Roll
Staff report dated November 2, 2009 submitting information on changes to
the 2009 Collector's Roll through the issuance of Supplementary/PAAB Rolls
06, 07 and 08.
For information only
4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERV/CES
1151
5. CORRESPONDENCE
1171
6. OTHER ISSUES
1181
Committee of the Whole Agenda
November 16, 2009
Page 4 of 4
7. ADJOURNMENT
8. COMMUNITY FORUM
COMMUNITY FORUM
The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to ask questions of
Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing
by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the
podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the
individual members of Council. The total time for this Forum is limited to 15
minutes.
If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a
response will be given.
Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings and
delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or
via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings.
Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future
of this community.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca
Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca
Checked by:
Date:
8ri[ish Columbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: November 09, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/040/09
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Application to Metro Vancouver Regional District to Amend Regional Context
Statement
24554 102 Avenue (Lower Jackson Farm) & (Lot A LMP 42378 at 100 Avenue
& 248 Street - Upper Jackson Farm
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On September 22, 2009 Council gave third reading to the above rezoning application. It was noted
that the approval of the Metro Vancouver Regional District to amend the Regional Context
Statement of the Official Community Plan was a condition of Final Approval.
To meet this condition, a resolution requesting that the Regional District Board accept this
amendment must be forwarded.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That the Metro Vancouver Regional District be requested to accept an amendment to the
Regional Context Statement and the land use designation as shown on Schedule "B" of the Maple
Ridge Official Community Plan for the subject property located at 100 Avenue & 248 Street -
Upper Jackson Farm.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Damax Consultants Ltd.
666921 B C LTD & 0710696 B C LTD
Legal Description: Section: 3, Township: 12, Plan: EP12314, Lot: A,
Section: 3, Township: 12, Plan: LMP42378
OCP:
Existing: Urban Reserve (Upper Jackson), Agricultural (Lower
Jackson)
Proposed: Urban Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) Lower Jackson,
A-1 (Small Holding Agricultural) Upper Jackson;
Proposed: R-1 (Residential District), RS -1b (One Family Urban
(Medium Density) Residential) - Upper Jackson
1101
Surrounding Uses - (Upper Jackson)
North: Use:
Zone:
South:
East:
West:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
b) Project Description:
Urban Residential (large lots) and gravel extraction
SRS (Special Urban Residential) and RS -3 (One
Family Rural Residential)
Low Med Residential (Albion Area Plan)
Rural Residential
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Urban Reserve (Thornhill)
Rural Residential and ALR
A-2 Upland Agriculture and RS -3 (One Family Rural
Residential)
Urban Reserve (Thornhill) and Agricultural
Rural Residential and Gravel Extraction
RS -3 One Family Rural Residential
Agricultural (Agricultural Land Reserve) and
Low/Medium Residential
Vacant- Lower Jackson, 4 lot Subdivision - Upper
Jackson
Urban - Upper Jackson, Park - Lower Jackson
8.96 HA (Upper Jackson) and 15.06 HA (Lower
Jackson)
Jackson Road
Full urban services required (Upper Jackson)
SD/040/09
This subject property is within the Thornhill Urban Reserve and is adjacent to a variety of land
designations, including Agricultural, Urban Reserve, and the Albion Area Plan designations. The
development plans for the Upper Jackson farm property are for 112 residential lots of a single family
nature and a variety of lot sizes, as follows:
• 9 RS -1(b) (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) lots with minimum lot sizes of
690 m2,
• 29 R-1(Residential District) lots with minimum lot sizes of 430 m2,
• 74 R-1 (Residential District) lots with minimum lot sizes of 371 m2.
The Lower Jackson Farm portion is intended to be in public ownership as a park as part of this
proposal but there are currently no formal plans in place for the development of the site as a park.
-2-
c) Planning Analysis:
The application has been given Third Reading and the applicant is addressing the conditions that
must be met prior to Final Approval. An amendment to the Regional Context Statement to permit
urban levels of development at this location is required prior to development occurring.
The recommended approach is that this application proceed as a letter to the Corporate Secretary's
Department of the Metro Vancouver Regional District. The amendment will proceed as a map
amendment to Schedule "B", the generalized land use map of the Official Community Plan. The
proposal will change the Urban Reserve designation of the subject property described as Upper
Jackson Farm to permit urban residential development.
The subject property will also need to be included in the Fraser Sewer Area Boundary in order to
provide urban servicing on the site. This application will be handled separately by the Engineering
Department.
CONCLUSION:
Council is requested to provide a resolution to the Metro Vancouver Regional District to amend the
Regional Context Statement of the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan. This request is consistent
with the direction given by Council to approve Rezoning Application RZ/040/09. It is noted that this
amendment is required to complete this application and is a final condition of zoning.
Prepared by: Diana Hall
Planner
ApproveMCIP
Director of P�annir��
Approved) y: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
Appendix A - Subject Map
-3-
I1u1111L
LlI,,i► I r,Irik
rl_ A
-
J
114W ,T4
ID
11111111
APIA
Illillllllll
1.1=
1
f
117.-
11
IIWP '
1111111111111
•IIII Illi
rill Vi!
,a 11 ennui
67,
102A
APPENDIX A
AVE
WWI:3N•► M ;:!
01 AVE
Lower Sac b,J
Subject Properties
SCALE 1:7,500
City of Pitt
Meadows
}
•
Iix"'R.LlJP'r4 11a'•a�l _ i■
Ate'
District of
Langley
1.4
�1�
24554-102 Ave & 84295-0000-0
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Jun 5, 2009 RZ/040/09 BY: JV
MAPLE RIDGE
4
British Columbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: November 10, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/044/09
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6684-2009
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw Nos.6685-2009 and 6696-2009
11213, 11247, 11263, 11299 and 11333 240 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject properties from RS -3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) zone and RM -1 (Townhouse Residential) zone, to
permit the construction of a Commercial/ Mixed use building and 165 townhouses.
This application requires an Official Community Plan amendment to Schedule "B" and "C" to change
the commercial designation, and to define the conservation boundary of Rainbow Creek. This
application also requires a site-specific Zoning Bylaw text amendment to the C-1 (Neighbourhood
Commercial) zone to permit "apartment use" as a principal use and to specify gross floor area for
the principal use, including the ground floor commercial uses.
This application will also be subject to a Commercial Development Permit for the proposed
commercial/ mixed-use building on the corner and a Multi -Family Development Permit for the
townhouse component along with some setback and height variances proposed and a Watercourse
Protection Development Permit for developing within 50 meters from the Rainbow Creek.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6684-2009 be given first
reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
2. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and
on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 6684-2009 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a
Development Information Meeting, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any
further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a public hearing on the bylaw;
3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6684-2009 be considered in
conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
4. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6684-
2009 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
1102
5. That Zone Amending Bylaw Nos. 6685-2009 and 6696-2009 be given first reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing; and that the following terms and conditions be met prior to final
reading:
ii.
Iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
DISCUSSION:
Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and
receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement;
Amendment to Schedule "B" & °C" of the Official Community Plan;
Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses
the suitability of the site for the proposed development;
Registration of a "Housing Agreement" stating that the apartment units above the
commercial building will be restricted to residential rental units;
Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the parking dedicated to the
residential rental units;
Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the habitat protection areas outside the
dedicated park area;
A Statutory right of way plan and agreement for municipal services must be
registered at the Land Title Office;
A Statutory right of way plan and agreement for the multi-purpose trial on strata
property must be registered at the Land Title Office;
Road dedication as required;
Park dedication as required;
Consolidation of the development site;
Removal of the existing buildings;
Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor parking on the
townhouse strata lot.
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Brian Shigetomi of Atelier Pacific Arch. Inc
Gold Leaf Enterprises Ltd
Lot: 5, Section: 16, TP: 12, NWD Plan: 26163; PID:
002-328-569
Lot: 6, Section: 16, TP: 12, MWD Plan: 26163; PID:
008-272-123
Parcel B, Part S 1/2 of S 1/2 of SE 1/4, Section: 16,
Township: 12, NWD Plan: RP3659; PID: 013-300-962
Parcel B, Part N 1/2 of S 1/2 of SE 1/4; Section: 16,
Township: 12; NWD Plan: RP3659; PID: 013-300-971
Parcel B, Part N 1/2 of SE 1/4, REF PL 3659.
Section: 16, TP: 12; NWD Plan: RP3659; PID: 013-
300-946
Existing: Medium Density Residential, Neighbourhood
Commercial
-2-
Proposed:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
b) Site & Project Description:
Neighbourhood Commercial, Medium Density
Residential and Conservation
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
RM -1 (Townhouse Residential), C-1 (Neighbourhood
Commercial)
Single Family Residential
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
74% Commercial and 26% Conservation
Single Family Residential and 112th Avenue
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Commercial, Residential & Conservation
Single Family Residential and 240th Street
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) and CD -1-
93 (Comprehensive Development)
Low and Medium Density Residential &
Conservation
Single Family Residential
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS -1b
(One Family Urban Residential- Medium Density)
Park and Conservation (Future Fire Hall).
Single Family Residential
Retail commercial with residential rental apartment
units above and townhouses.
5.99 Hectares (14.8 acres)
240th Street and 112th Avenue
Full Urban
SD/044/09; DP/044/09 (WPDP); DP/046/09 and
VP/046/09 (Mixed-use); DP/045/09 and VP/045/09
(Multi -family -Townhouses)
The subject sites consist of 5 lots and totaling 14.8 acres, on the north-west corner of 240th Street
and 112th Avenue. Rainbow Creek runs north -south along the western edge. A total of 26.9% of the
site will be dedicated as "Park" due to its environmentally sensitive nature. This proposal will also
facilitate the development of a multi-purpose trail that promises to be a good pedestrian north -south
linkage.
3
Historically the most southerly lot had several greenhouse buildings that had been demolished and
cleared in the summer of 2008 while the four northerly lots have single family dwellings. In general
the subject sites have a gentle slope from north to south with a slight plateau at the northeast
corner. Site slopes ranging from 20% to 35% are evident closer to the Rainbow Creek.
The proposal consists of two components: A mixed use commercial building with residential rental
apartment units on the upper floor and a large phased townhouse development of 165 units. The
total proposed commercial lot area is 1.30 acres (5,224.2 m2) and the total proposed townhouse lot
area is 9.25 acres (37,533.1 m2), the rest will be dedicated as "park" and road. The Site Plan shows
two vehicular accesses, one from 112th Avenue and one from 240th Street. Two pedestrian accesses
will be created at 112th Avenue and two from 240th Street (Appendix E- Site Plan) with special
gateway entrance statements.
The proposed commercial/ mixed-use development accommodates 11 retail -commercial units (of
varying sizes between 660 ft2 to 1360 ft2) on the ground floor facing both 240th Street and 112th
Avenue. Commercial parking is proposed behind the building so each commercial unit will have two
entry doors, one serving the parking area and the other allowing access to a shopper. A corner cafe
with outdoor seating is proposed to create a corner focal element for the community. On the upper
floor, 16 rental apartment units each with one or two bedrooms (varying sizes between 460 ft2 to
860 ft2 each) have been proposed.
The proposed townhouse development accommodates a strata complex of 2.5 & 3 storey
townhouses (165 units ranging from 1,500 ft2 to 2,030 ft2 each in size) in the RM -1 zone
(Townhouse Residential). Arranged in clusters of two to six ground -oriented units, each unit has a
grade access and a garage off a lane. There are six townhouse unit types (3 bed room units) of
varying sizes. A combination of three color schemes has been proposed to create facade variation.
The proposed Commercial use on the corner will be fenced off with an adequate landscaping buffer,
yet will have pedestrian accesses for residents from the townhouse development. Outdoor amenity
areas as well as a system of linear parkettes/ greenways are inter -woven into the townhouse
clusters providing alternative pedestrian connections throughout the site (Appendix E). Entry
features at all access points are proposed to foster a "sense of place". An innovative on-site Storm
Water Management Plan is proposed throughout the site.
The applicant has submitted a Transportation Assessment Report by Bunt & Associates Engineering
Ltd. dated June 2009; a Geotechnical Investigation Report by Valley Geotechnical Engineering
Services Ltd. dated June 16, 2009; an Arborist Report by Van Der Zalm & Associates Inc. dated June
15, 2009; preliminary Site Grading Plan, Site Servicing Concept Plan, preliminary Storm water
Management Plan & details by H Y Engineering Ltd. dated June 2008, April & May 2009.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The Official Community Plan states that a total of 500 acres are designated to be commercial within
the District, however 140 acres of it are under-utilized or vacant. Specific to this area around the
intersection of 240th Street and 112th Avenue, the lands south of 112th Avenue, on both the east
-4-
and west sides of 240th Street are designated "Neighbourhood Commercial" in addition to a large
portion of the proposed development. Four out of the five lots comprising the subject site are
already designated "Neighborhood Commercial". Section 6.3.6 Neighbourhood Commercial Centers
of the Official Community Plan identifies this intersection as a neighbourhood commercial center
which are intended to be small retail areas that cater to "the daily convenience shopping and
service needs of a local neighbourhood". These areas are typically less than 929 m2 (10,000 ft2) in
area. Reduction in the existing neighbourhood commercial designation for the subject site would
support the Official Community Plan policies of providing adequate neighbourhood commercial
designation within the community at an appropriate size.
Several policies in the Official Community Plan encourage street -front oriented commercial uses in a
pedestrian -friendly building form with apartments above. Policy 6-37 states that "Maple Ridge will
encourage the development of Neighbourhood Commercial Centers within walking distance of
neighbourhoods to service the daily convenience shopping and service needs of residents in the
local neighbourhood". The proposal has a small-scale (11 retail units) neighbourhood commercial
component with street presence on both 240th Street and 112th Avenue and intends to cater to the
daily shopping needs of the existing neighbourhood as well as the proposed townhouse
development.
Policy 3-34 also states that "Maple Ridge supports the provision of affordable, rental and special
needs housing throughout the District". Policy 3-33 also states that "Maple Ridge supports the
provision of rental accommodation and encourages the construction of rental units that vary in size
and number of bedrooms". In support of both the policies stated above the neighbourhood
commercial use will accommodate rental accommodation on the upper floor.
In the Official Community Plan, 240th Street is considered to be a major corridor. The Official
Community Plan supports a variety of housing forms and encourages mixed-use developments
where appropriate. Policy 3-20 states that "Major Corridor Residential" developments must be
designed to be compatible with the surrounding; be a maximum of 2.5 storeys with an emphasis on
ground -oriented units (except for apartments) and adhere to the applicable Development Permit
Guidelines. The proposed townhouse strata development meets these criteria and fits well with the
surrounding uses.
The park dedication achieved through this proposal will increase the conservation area of
environmentally sensitive lands around "Rainbow Creek". This requires Schedule "C" of the Official
Community Plan to be amended.
Zoning Bylaw:
Two zones have been proposed: C-1 zone (Neighborhood Commercial) and RM -1 zone (Townhouse
District). This zone permits a maximum lot coverage of 40% of the net lot area and a maximum
building height of 7.5 meters. The proposed lot coverage is 23%. A height variance will be required
for the proposed 11.0 m height. This zone also restricts gross floor area of all permitted principal
uses to an aggregate 279 m2. A site-specific text amendment to the C-1 zone (Neighborhood
Commercial) is proposed to permit "apartment use" as a principal use and to permit the maximum
gross floor area of the principal use not to exceed 2,100 m2 . This site-specific text amendment also
-5-
restricts the ground floor commercial uses to a gross floor area of 960 m2 (Appendix "D"). This zone
requires the front and exterior side yard setbacks to be 7.5 meters; the rear setback to be 6.0
meters and the interior side yard setback to be 3.0 meters from the property line. Some setback and
building height variances to the C-1 zone (Neighborhood Commercial) are required as stated below.
The proposed RM -1 zone (Townhouse Residential District) is intended for low to medium density
townhouses and multi family residential buildings. A maximum density of 0.6 times the net lot area
is permitted. Proposed total density is 0.591 times the net lot area giving a total of 22,163.15m2 of
total gross floor area for the 165 townhouses. Common useable open space required in this zone is
7,425 m2 and proposed is 8,250 m2 in two locations for better access & usability by residents
(Appendix "E"). The required common activity area for this zone is 825 m2 and the proposed area is
4,900 m2. Maximum permitted height in this zone must not exceed 10.5 meters nor 2.5 storeys.
Some units exceed this height requirement hence a height variance is required as stated below.
Some setback variances to the RM -1 zone (Townhouse Residential District) will also be required.
Proposed variances to the Zoning Bylaw:
For the Commercial/ mixed-use building, proposed variances include:
• Setback variances: Proposed front setback (along 240th Street)=4.5 m (required front
setback =7.5 m); Proposed exterior side setback (along 112th Avenue)=4.5 m (required side
yard setback =7.5 m);
• Height variance: Proposed building height =11.0 m.
For the Townhouse development, proposed variances include:
• Setback variances: Proposed front setback (along 240th Street)=4.5m (required front
setback =7.5 m); Proposed exterior side setback (along 112th Avenue)=4.5 m (required side
yard setback =7.5 m); Proposed Interior side yard setback=5.2m (required interior side yard
setback= 7.5 m) for Unit type 1A;
• Height variance: Proposed maximum height for blocks 32 and 33=12.24 m (10.5 m max.
permitted); proposed maximum height for block 34=12.06 m (10.5 m max. permitted) &
Proposed maximum height for block 35=12.54 m (10.5 m max. permitted).
These variances will form a part of a report for Council consideration at a later date.
Off-street Parking and Loading Bylaw:
As per the Maple Ridge Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990, the C-1 zone
(Neighborhood Commercial) requires 1 parking space per 30 m2 of gross floor area of the
commercial building, for the commercial use. The proposed gross floor area -of the retail commercial
use is 955 m2, requiring 31.8 commercial spaces, 32 commercial use parking stalls have been
proposed at the rear of the retail units. The parking requirement for apartment use is 1.0 space per
unit plus 0.2 spaces per unit for visitors. This project proposes a total of 19 residential parking stalls
and 4 visitor parking stalls separated by a drive aisle (Appendix "E"). A single loading bay will also be
provided.
-6-
As per the Maple Ridge Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990, the RM -1 zone
(Townhouse Residential District) requires 2 residential parking spaces plus 0.2 visitor parking
spaces per unit. All the 165 units have their own parking garages, with 2 parking spaces per unit. 64
garages are two -car and 101 garages are tandem. A total of 332 residential parking spaces and 40
visitor parking spaces have been proposed to give a total of 372 spaces (363 spaces are required in
the proposed zone). Visitor parking stalls are well distributed as shown on the Site Plan.
Development Permits:
• The proposed design of the Commercial/ mixed-use building will have to be consistent with
the "Commercial Development Permit Guidelines" for form and character as per Section 8.7
of the Official Community Plan. Application for the Development Permit has been received
and will be the subject of a future Council Report.
• The proposed design of Townhouses will have to be consistent with the "Multi -Family
Development Permit Guidelines" for form and character as per Section 8.7 of the Official
Community Plan. This will be the subject of a future Council Report.
• The proposed development will have to comply with the Watercourse Protection
Development Permit Area Guidelines due to it's proximity to the Rainbow Creek.
Advisory Design Panel:
On September 8, 2009 the Advisory Design Panel reviewed the proposal and commended the
applicant for its extremely high quality presentation, completeness and quality of materials
proposed. The panel recommended that the following concerns be addressed by the applicant as
the design develops and submit to planning staff:
• Address boardwalk safety issues in relation to slipping on rain snow and ice;
• Consider continuity of pedestrian parkways from the residential areas to the commercial
area;
• Consider the facade detailing to ensure materials return at corners and terminate
purposefully;
• Consider how access is provided to private rear yards for maintenance and improvements;
• Encourage the development of interpretive signage in public areas and recommendations'
for strata bylaw guidelines.
The project architect is working towards addressing these issues which will form a part of the
Development Permit report at a later date.
Development Information Meeting:
On September 28, 2009 the applicant (project -architect), owner/ developer, other consultants and
the landscape architect held the "Development Information Meeting" at the Kanaka Creek
Elementary School at 11120, 234A Street from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. This meeting was attended
by approximately 25 to 30 people and some highlights were:
-7-
• All the drawings of the proposal were displayed for all interested residents and positive
comments were heard about the land use and cleaning up of existing sites.
• Questions related to Traffic Control, Site access and the future Fire Hall site were most
common. The developer and consultants provided necessary information about these.
• Concerns were expressed around the possible noise and pedestrian traffic that could be
generated by the multi-purpose trail users along the dedicated park boundary and about
Elementary School catchment areas and capacity to absorb more kids in the existing
schools.
• The consultant team addressed general questions related to project -phasing, construction
time -frames, type of occupancy for the retail commercial units, proposed landscaping on
site, treatment of buildings and the multi-purpose trail, etc. More specific questions about
the townhouse strata development such as visitor parking, buffer treatment, townhouse unit
sizes & layouts, provision of green and walk able spaces, exterior treatment of buildings and
connectivity were answered by consultants.
• Several residents strongly supported the proposed Commercial/ Retail use but were not in
favour of a liquor store, pub or a big box retailer due to fear of increased crime and
homeless people. They also had concerns of the rental units above the commercial use
bringing in low-income residents and insecurity in the neighbourhood.
• A request for further information regarding proposed location of sewer lines was made.
The Development Information Meeting concluded at 9:30 PM.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department reviewed the proposal and has the following comments:
• Road dedication of 3.0 meters along the length of both: 240th Street and 112th Avenue plus
a 5m X 5m corner truncation at the intersection.
• 240th Street & 112th Avenue frontages: Widen to Urban Arterial standard, including provision
for ultimate five -lane approach to the 112th Avenue intersection including curb, gutter,
separated sidewalks, Street trees, Ornamental Street lighting, under -ground wiring for all
utilities and other intersection improvements such as traffic signage & signal system,
concrete median with flasher luminaries and bicycle lane;
• Sanitary Sewer/ Storm Sewer/ Drainage: On 240th Street, sanitary & storm sewer system
upgrade from existing system south of 113th Avenue to existing system at 110th Avenue
• Water main: New service connections to both proposed lots and relocation of hydrants to
accommodate road widening.
• Coordination with CMBC existing bus stops on 240th Street and 112th Avenue.
• DCC: No DCC payable at zoning stage; DCC forgiveness possible at the Building Permit stage;
• Right -of Way: A municipal statutory right-of-way for a road culvert (Plan LMP 30218) exists at
the southwest corner of the subject site, which will be made redundant by road dedication
and park dedication. Other existing easement plan (Plan RP75056) and existing pipeline
easement serving future municipal fire hall on the west must be sorted out by the applicant.
-8-
Fire Department:
The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and comments that due to the future municipal fire
hall site on the west of the subject sites, 112th Avenue and 240th Street will be primary fire -response
routes. They will need to be built to arterial standard and appropriate traffic light additions/
upgrades at 112th Avenue; Kanaka way and 240th Street intersection are required.
Building Department:
The Building Department reviewed the proposal and has the following comments:
• All proposed structures to comply with the applicable sections of the code; including non-
combustible construction, fire -rated part wall of 1 hour at the underside of the roof, covered
patios and open decks, etc and fire truck accessibility conformation;
• Verify water pressure for fire sprinkler system;
• Geotechnical and Infiltration covenants will be required.
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed
they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In case of this project, exact number of
street trees will be finalized at the Development Permit stage through the detailed landscape plan.
The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00
per new tree will increase their budget requirements and that all trees within the dedicated park
area must be assessed for safety prior to park dedication and hazardous trees removed at the
applicant's expense.
e) School District Comments:
A referral was sent to the School District Office and there was no response.
f) Intergovernmental lssues:
Local Government Act:
An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any
affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section
882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, (insert amendment), is considered to
be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing
procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an
adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial
Governments.
The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste
Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact.
-9-
g) Environmental lmplications:
The subject sites consisting of 5 legal lots are impacted by Rainbow Creek that runs north -south
along the western edges; hence the application will be subject to a Watercourse Protection
Development Permit through which substantial enhancement works and re -vegetation will be
required along with a five-year maintenance period and securities to ensure that the proposed
environmental works will be implemented. The environmentally sensitive area will be dedicated as
"Park" which contributes to approximately 26.9% of the consolidated site although some pockets
will be covenanted for habitat protection.
CONCLUSION:
The proposal is a pedestrian -friendly urban solution including dedicated park area, multi-purpose
trail connection from 112th Avenue to 240th street and enhancement works proposed around the
Rainbow Creek. Research done by independent analysis by Rollo and Associates during the 2006
Official Community Plan review process supports the reduction of commercial designated lands at
this location. Through the requirement of rental residential units in the commercial/ mixed-use
building, the proposal promises to add a quality rental option for residents. Some variances as
stated above require approval at the Development Permit stage which Council will review at a later
date. It is recommended that this proposal be given favourable consideration and forwarded to
Public Hearing.
Prepared by: Rasika Acharya, B -Arch, M -Tech, UD (SFU)
pproved ► Ja - ■' - ' _, MCIP
Approved by Frank Quinn, MBA, R: -ET,
C,GM: P iic Worl�s & Development Services
Concurrence/ J. L. (Jim)- ule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - OCP Amending Bylaw 6684-2009
Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw 6685-2009
Appendix D - Zone Amending Bylaw 6696-2009
Appendix E - Site Plan
Appendix F - Building Elevations
Appendix G - Preliminary Storm water Management Plan
- 10 -
A
406
LM
1334[1
46
N31
LFA
45
P
44
3797
43
113 B AVE.
is
4
11413
m 3
m
11414 c9
2
11410 3 a
P 34984
1/
RP 3659
11403
11397
22
1416
*PP045
A
RP 8357
11394
7
11382
1 I 6
BCP •0580
15 16
11003
773&5
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
363
11333
s
RP 3659
N 1/2 of S 1/2 B
11299
RP 3659
S 1/2 of S 1/2 B
11263
Pol. 'P'
RP 1224
LMP 24722 PARK
City of Pitt
Meadows •
JI
6 P 26163
11247
11213
5
P 26163
EP 15665
c
P 19825
SCALE 1:2,500
District of
Langley
FRASER lid
4
11362
3
11356
1350
113 AAVE.
11339 -!
5
11328
4
11316
3
11310 2 0_
v
m
11302
1
11220 numo stn
11320
11303
9
1
2
17250
8
N W P5589
11213/47/63/99 & 11333 240 STREET
MAPLE RIDGE
Brtish Cu lumnia
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Jun 22, 2009 FILE: RZ/044/09 BY: PC
Pi -prep -dry a
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6684-2009
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "B" & "C" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open
meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 6684-2009
2. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot: 5, Section: 16, Township: 12, NWD Plan: 26163; PID: 002-328-569
And Lot: 6, Section: 16, Township: 12, NWD Plan: 26163; PID: 008-272-123
And Parcel B, Part S 1/2 of S 1/2 of SE 1/4, Section: 16, Township: 12, NWD Plan: RP3659;
PLD: 013-300-962
And Parcel B, Part N 1/2 of S 1/2 of SE 1/4; Section: 16, Township: 12; NWD Plan: RP3659;
PID: 013-300-971
And Parcel B, Part N 1/2 of SE 1/4, REF PL 3659; Section: 16, Township: 12; at Lot 5;
Section 16; TP 12; NWD Plan 26163; PID: 013-300-946
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 779, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this bylaw are hereby redesignated as shown.
3. Schedule "C" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot: 5, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: 26163; PID: 002-328-569
And Lot: 6, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: 26163; PID: 008-272-123
And Parcel B, Part S 1/2 of S 1/2 of SE 1/4, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: RP3659;
PID: 013-300-962
And Parcel B, Part N 1/2 of S 1/2 of SE 1/4; Section: 16, Township: 12; Plan: RP3659;
PID: 013-300-971
And Parcel B, Part N 1/2 of SE 1/4, REF PL 3659; Section: 16, Township: 12;
PID: 013-300-946
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No.780, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby amended by adding Conservation.
4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 200 .
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 .
MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
iliMIIMIMIallegif'Jr1u1�
Wil! ►y�—
113 8 AVE.
ti
1 77405
LMP 31333
17197
»402 PARK 22
21 LMP 31331
N
7
11382
13
7j'
Pcl. 2 RP 6761
- J
6 o
77376
0
m
12
1137'
1
32
ry 33
34 h hL
35
Pd- 1
113725 o
/.
0 11 77�r
4p36
3397
38
0.797 ho RP 6260
71362 d
U 10 713. ,f
30
7l1.
LAdp
3 m
-m 9
18
77356
1135" c..
29 0^,
19 17 ' 97
ti 16
ii ♦eis,
7735_2
8 Q I:
` 04 o9 ,3"
so a A
Z$ 20
�i
ti
173 A AVE.263,,.v
•�♦i♦i
�iiiii
;TO
1336
r� 6 T7Ji8
g 21 j� 2314
71328
tp ry
14 )
i
4 co
1132 28
224x3 _ -
.
! 137G cv
N 7 /7 s
03 23 �`S36 6.
ry P�
i•
0]
71310
2 m
' d 1137
�µ m 8
�Q.
♦� i
11302
1
1T-Cr
Y 1730 1137
1 9 1/30531 BCP
fripT. + Tr .4/ Pr NI
HCr2285aE?
1
il. Iff
♦ i44 0*
i
f♦ �♦ ♦♦ Rii
♦iii �►i
1.214 ha
n
77300
Ali_�
N
a 2
Pcl. 'P'
N1F 11'
/ y♦•�77250
#.T
NV
0.779 ha
RP 1224
4.047 ha
ri�ii;
i
1 i # a
iii Ask' 4
♦ '''''
r4 i
n
7
7
a A. ds:
,
24722\ / PARK
,,, �4
11
Ua
Q.
.,
c
S
NW P5589
VIAL-
Bylaw No.
Map No.
From: Urban
TGE OFFICIAL COVVUITY
6684-2009
779
Residential, Commercial, Park and Conservation
DLA\ ANE\iI\G
Commercial
Residential
To:
0.0
Urban
///1 Conservation
1:2500
.....__.
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
A 0(
' CI3 VI 0_
c�
�� fp3
113 9 AVE. �)
ry
1 11405 f. 2 PARK 221>3s�
LMP 3133 21 LMP 31331
7
11392
13
'
Pcl. 2 RP 6761
J
11$76 op g
1
ev32
N33
a
N34,,
Pcl. 1
/1372■1.
L
P
36
3 g7
X38
0.797 ha RP 6260
11362 0
• 'JJ
,'.,,
30
W MP
18
! 7363
3 w
11356
9
1135- 0,
97
O 19 17 q9
0' ti 16
11.�so
. 2 /
•T- r t 29
$ .mss 2.
2,3-45,4_ ry'T
8 ^"> 2iiiii
N 1 8
ry°
113 A AVE.
26d2 Q
3s
17336
k 6 r7 j
23878
Z 21 j' ^
F.:
11329 `o
• 'LC'
14 n
4 co
•' N 1132' 28
22 r86 "P <
Q
R 3659
U
o
77376 N
I N 7 1T j
23
i ASE 12
.023 ha
N m
/1310 U
2 m
' 37
0
\3 `pB.SB
11
.1 7,3,33
11302 7130 17 7
1130631 BCP
— 1 9
RP 3659
1.012 N 1/2 of S 1/2 B
71295
l7 u p 5to
BC22866
� "
1
RP 3659
S 1/2 of S 1/2 B
1.214 ha
n
11300 d._
1 .012 ha
1726.3
eJ
LN
2
rL
Pcl. 'P'
0.809 ha .6 P 26163 71247
0.779 ha
11250
RP 1224
4.047 ha
RP 75
1ol
— LI 1 3
5
P 2616
1.200 ha
218
1121'
ro
24722\ /PARK
IN,
11
IIS
Z
R
C
B
NWP5589
VAPLE TGE OFFICIAL CON
Bylaw No. 6684-2009
Map No. 780
PURPOSE: TO ADD AS CONSERVATION
IVU\ITY PLA\ AVE\9I\C
ON SCHEDULE C
1:2500
4
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
ppeA
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6685-2009
A Bylaw to amend Map A forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
And
And
And
And
1.
This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6685-2009."
2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot: 5, Section: 16, Township: 12, NWD Plan: 26163; PID: 002-328-569
Lot: 6, Section: 16, Township: 12, NWD Plan: 26163; PID: 008-272-123
Parcel B, Part S 1/2 of S 1/2 of SE 1/4, Section: 16, Township: 12, NWD Plan: RP3659;
PID: 013-300-962
Parcel B, Part N 1/2 of S 1/2 of SE 1/4; Section: 16, Township: 12; NWD Plan: RP3659;
PID: 013-300-971
Parcel B, Part N 1/2 of SE 1/4, REF PL 3659; Section: 16, Township: 12; NWD Plan:
RP3659; PID: 013-300-946
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1460, a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM -1 (Townhouse Residential).
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of
READ a second time the day of
READ a third time the day of
, A.D. 200 .
, A.D. 200 .
, A.D. 200 .
, A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 2010.
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
A Ppo•ai iX c
V������
- rii.a��
W� Q�
t 13 B AVE.
N
1 »�°
LMP 31333
— — — 7139
17402 PARK 22
21 LMP .31331
3
7
17382
13
'7�a�
s
2 RP 6761
17376
c
v.Pcl.
1I33u3536
Pcl. 1
50
71372 N
0 11
N 1137
�,I
33 97 37
1,
0.797 ha RP 6260
71362
U 10 773.
30
70
Mph
18
3
17356
9
1735 �ti'
29
rn
19 17 97
9
N nY 16
17 3530
2
Q
8
ism 250
in 23
28 20
.7
iiiii
$
te°
113 A AVE.&6
7 ''',-r6.›,fi
BCP 15941
y 7i
6a
g 2134>, 238784
387148
11328
►.
I
^�
4 c
• 1 1132
28
.• Q
22 6 a
3659
Wial
N 7 7 s
' 23 -A 1 62 a
c
_023 ha
113 2 U
m
•
ul m 837
D
j2Q
1133
17302
1
> 13�
9
17 7
7130631 BCP
RP 3659
1.012 N 1/2 of S 1/2 B
1729
BC 22866
1
RP '3659
S 1/2 S 1/2 B
1.214 ha
r-
11300 d-
1.012 ha of
7125 .
r')
N
N 2
a
Pcl. 'P'
0.809 ha 6 P 26163
1124
0.779 ha
17250
RP 1224
4.047 ha
1
— J ■
75
e:
5
P 2616
1.200 h(RP
/121
m
■ Mil
24722\ /PARK
s
uo
ry
1Jlo
U�-
Z
J
c
B
NWP5589
VALE
Bylaw No.
Map No.
From:
To:
TGE ZO\E AVE\3I\G
6685-2009
1460
RS-3(One Family Rural Residential)
RM -1 (Townhouse Residential)
j/ka
1:2500
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6696-2009
A Bylaw to amend the text in the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) applicable
to the subject site (legal description below) and Map A forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6696-2009."
2. That PART 7 - COMMERCIAL ZONES, 701 NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMERCIAL: C-1(1)
Permitted Principal Uses, is amended by the addition of e) as stated below:
e) apartment use is permitted specific to the following site: part of Lot 5; Section 16; TP
12; NWD Plan 26163; PID: 002-328-569 as shown in Map No. 1463 attached.
3. That PART 7 - COMMERCIAL ZONES, 701 NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMERCIAL: C-1 (8)
OTHER REGULATIONS b) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:
b) (i) The gross floor area of all permitted principal uses shall not in the aggregate exceed 279 m2.
(ii) The gross floor area of all permitted principal uses shall not in the aggregate exceed 2100
m2 on Lot 5; Section 16; TP 12; NWD Plan 26163; PID: 002-328-569. Gross Floor Area
of the ground floor commercial uses shall not exceed a total of 960 m2.
4. That PART 7 - COMMERCIAL ZONES, 701 NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMERCIAL: C-1 (8)
OTHER REGULATIONS, is amended by the addition of clause f):
f) An apartment use at Lot 5; Section 16; TP 12; NWD Plan 26163; PID: 002-328-569:
(i) shall be limited exclusively to storeys above the first storey of a building;
(ii) shall be the only use in a storey so used;
(iii) shall be located within a building above a permitted commercial use;
5. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Eastern part of Lot 5; Section 16; TP 12, NWD Plan 26163; PID: 002-328-569 and outlined in heavy
black line on Map No. 1463, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are
hereby rezoned to C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial).
6. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A"
attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
7 Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended is hereby amended,
applicable to lands none other than described above, accordingly:
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 2010.
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
A r +x D
"+ •r I"+ J‘i
[
Lm r-,.�.,
113 B AVE. ry ti
LMP 31333
1739 N 11394
7121 2jl•y PARK LMP 31331 22
11382
��5
13 4_.t,'5.
Pcl. 2 RP 6761 J
6 o
0 12
oa '
1
.'1
ry32ry33ry3,ti
„�
cb
35 h36
Pcl. 1
77376 >�
n
77372 C9
113
2 11 7737
30
p
33 97 ti37
38
0.797 ha RP 6260
77352 u
U 10 7135 '�
. g �
17
11356
113 ' c~'
29 ^ 19 17 $g 97
77350
Q .--
so
'a 23pirs. 0 23892
2
N 1 /2 B
113 A AVE. ti ,>�2
ti
7 9
M
/126
>' 23878
�
t S 6 0
211• ^
7 x.728 up
14
�
4 co
j732
28
i
N.�`�$6�a,
RP 3659 a
0
N 11 5
a
23
ry AJC-- ?`3, 12
of
N
2.023 ha
113 '
2 m :..
U7rT/•
m 8
4
�,
11
77
77302 1130 7
JP 9 7930631 BCP
— —
RP 3659
1.012 ha N 1/2 of S 1/2 B
1129•
8C 2286.
1
RP 3659
1.012 ha S 1/2 of S 1/2 B
1.214 ha
11.300 -a-
7726
ro
• N
N 2
a
Pcl. 'P'
0.809 ha 6 P
26163 7724
0.779 ha
11250
23985
N
r
RP 1224
4.047 ha -
iP-75-05 E
1 LMP 3C218
5
P 2616
1.200 he
p
k
24722\ /PARK
11)4?
c
B
NWP5589
VALE TGE ZO\E AME\DI\G
Bylaw No, 6696-2009
Map No. 1463
From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential)
To: C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) .
A
1:2500
bi,i,
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
ElITiiiiiiir
. ` g.: :Clit
IP, 111011P 11111.
of
mei. Int all
A• r _i
0
0
1-
z
Id
a
0
J
W
W
0
Id
U]
3
0
I
Z
0
1-
0
W
0
a
0
tt
a
SITE LAYOUT
SCALE - 1:400
EST CORNER OF
n
0
N N s
i
i 4
7 z 2
a a
.1 , W U
w zr
N V 2 K W
ft 0 0 a0
0 W W a am
L a
U N
ti m w C W
0 . + -U
J WOOD] POS
o a
N
GARAGE DOORS
FRONT J REAR DOORS
CULTURED STONE VENEER
0
4
a
x
NN
20
F �
0 2
OK
VINYL WINDOW FRAMES
WINDOW 7 DOOR TRIMS
VINYL SOFFITS
TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION - BLOCK TYPE 'V
Colours /Materials Palette
COLOUR SCHEME 1
AAr4ix F
4 d
0
Tia
NarlhWas' Cornttr of 24Ofl Strad & 112th Av.nu•, Mnpia Rid;.
lel
r
COLOURS + MATERIALS
a)
estO.
a)
.r
2
CO
0
�0
V
2ONTAL VINYL SIDING]
O
z
1
INO 2 [VERTICAL VINYL SIDIND]
}
0
0
z
0
O
WOOD POSrs ! BEAMS I
GARAGE DOORS
FRONT /REAR DOORS
1 1
CULTURED STONE VENEER
VINYL WINDOW FRAMES
WINDOW I DOOR TRIMS
VINYL SOFFITS
BLOCK TYPE '
itypei•-dix
1-
Z
W
0.
0
J
Id
W
0
W
N
a
I
Z
0
1-
0
Id
N
0
a
0
m
a
COLOUR SCHEME 1
SIDING 2 (VERTICAL VINYL SIDIN
2 (PROFILED VINYL SHINGLE
PROFILED ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT
GARAGE DOORS
FRONT! REAR DOORS
CULTURED STONE VENEER
VINYL WINDOW FRAMES
WINDOW / DOOR TRIMS
VINYL SOFFITS
0
2
N
a-
0 0
r0
L
'■ I
1
COLOUR SCHEME
z
W
a
0
J
w
W
0
W
N
0
I
Z
0
F
0
W
N
0
a
0
a
N J
a
CE
0w
-J-
112th Avenue. Maple Ridg■
NorlhWaat Corner al 240th Stiller &
COLOURS + MATERIALS
44
1 [HORIZONTAL VINYL SIDINGj
LED VINYL
Irr., ;x r
11
L R ,
JZ."!
Cs'
W
2
W
0
N
IX
0
—J
0
0
H
z
W
0.
0
J
W
w
J
4
re
W
i
0
0
0
W
m
0
a
0
re
a
oS
GO J
2 4
M CC
0w 0 4C
U 2
NORTHWEST CORNER OF 240TH STREET ■ 112TH AVE, MAPLE RIDGE, 6.0
ATFL$FR PAW IC ARCIERECT4 RE cra M T. fUUIMEf RIMC 1 TP
0
iJ
CD
O
1-
z
W
1
a
W
0
4J
0
ac
1
z
0
a
0
4
a
n
a
re
n
co • -I
ca
7 0[
ow
�r
2
RIDGE. 6 C.
NORTHWEST CORNER OF 210TH STREET 4 112TH AVE , MAPLE
IITEIIEH PACIFIC AIICXR ECJI NE uO X.* En tNE1 I '1 I tp
!C„TLU@Ln 1
ApptiNdi C
W -
0 a �^
W N
J
ITD
E Ir0
2
O -J 6.1
0
U- . h y
2
H 2 V,
- IC IA
1.1 0 •
o _
Z�
0
i 3C.
0. gr -
U 0 n
r.
•
MAPLE RIDGE
Brr Ih C0111„Ihia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: November 9, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: AL/060/09
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Application to Exclude Land from the Agricultural Land Reserve
23589 & 23571 Lougheed Highway
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received under Section 30 (1) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act to
exclude from the Agricultural Land Reserve approximately 3.5 hectares (8.9 acres) of land located at
23589 & 23571 Lougheed Highway. The applicant intends to develop the site for commercial
development. The application conforms with the notice of application requirements of the
Agricultural Land Commission.
At their February 14, 2005 Workshop, Council resolved that the process for referring applications for
exclusion to the Agricultural Land Commission include the options noted under the
Recommendation heading.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation and direction is being sought from Council:
a) That the application not be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land
Commission; or
b) That the application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission
with a summary of Council's comments.
Staff recommendation: That Council not authorize this application to go forward to the Agricultural
Land Commission.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Clem De Gobbi
Owner: Clem De Gobbi
Legal Description: Lot: 1, Plan: 8827& Lot: 2, Plan: 8827
OCP:
Existing:
Zoning:
Existing:
Agricultural
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
1103
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Previous Applications:
b) Project Description:
Park (Albion Sports Complex)
CD -4-88 Agricultural Events, Special Events, Swap
Meets, etc)
Park in the Agricultural Land Reserve.
Industrial
M-2 General Industrial
Industrial
Rural Residential
RS -3 One Family Rural Residential
Agricultural
Commercial (legal non -conforming)
RS -3 One Family Rural Residential
Agricultural
Vacant
Commercial
3.5 Hectares (8.9 acres)
Lougheed Highway
on-site water and sewer
AL/117/04 included other properties in the vicinity
for a large scale exclusion application, which Council
denied from proceeding to the Agricultural Land
Commission.
The subject properties are located within the Albion Flats and have a combined area of 3.5 hectares
(8.9 acres). They are situated within and along the boundary of the Agricultural Land Reserve. If
successful, the applicant intends to develop the site for commercial purposes.
The area is within the floodplain of the Fraser River, and is environmentally sensitive, with
watercourses, known fish presence, and wildlife habitat. Any potential development must address
this issue.
c) Planning Analysis:
Development Considerations
Official Community Plan. The site proposes to develop urban levels of commercial development on
a site that is not considered available for urban development and is therefore at odds with the
stated direction of the Community as outlined in the Official Community Plan. The Regional Context
Statement of the Official Community Plan outlines the District's commitment to growth management
measures by containing growth within the Urban Area Boundary.
-2-
Amending the Urban Area Boundary. It was recognized at the time of the adoption of the Official
Community Plan that amendments to the Urban Area Boundary might be pursued in certain
instances to meet specific community objectives, such as generating more local employment.
These issues are discussed in Section 6.1 of the Official Community Plan. A process for extending
the urban area boundary for this purpose is discussed in Policy 6-4 of the Official Community Plan.
The Albion Flats. Section 6.2.3 of the Official Community Plan notes the strategic importance of the
Albion Flats to the community and its potential for a variety of suitable land uses. It also notes that
these properties are under municipal, regional, and provincial jurisdiction, and therefore, land use
decisions that would change their agricultural designation cannot be made without the consent of
these other jurisdictions. This section of the Official Community Plan recognizes the need for
collaboration with the following agencies, who also have objectives that must be met:
o Agricultural Land Commission. In reviewing a number of applications in the Albion
Flats over the years, the Commission has agreed to endorse in principle the concept
of subareas within the Flats (pertinent correspondence from the Commission is
appended to this report). In 1999 the Commission indicated that it would support
agri-industrial uses on the subject properties and their retention in the Agricultural
Land Reserve. It is uncertain at this time if the Commission is still supportive of this
initiative
o Metro Vancouver Regional District. The Regional District is undergoing a review of
the Regional Growth Strategy for the Region. This review will be completed in the
near future. At this stage, the land is designated agricultural and outside the urban
area boundary. Clarity is being sought from the Regional District about this area
o Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District. This regional agency is part of
the Metro Vancouver Regional District. It is involved with the extension of sewer
services, and is directed by the Liquid Waste Management Plan. The objectives of
this agency are integrated with the growth management plan for the Metro
Vancouver Regional District. The subject properties are not within the Fraser Sewer
Area and the approval of the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District
would be required to amend the Fraser Sewer Area boundary.
Official Community Plan Implementation. No applications for exclusion have been forwarded to the
Agricultural Land Commission since the adoption of the Official Community Plan on November 14,
2006. Chapter 11, the Implementation section, recommends the sequencing of Council directed
work to advance community objectives. Towards this end, Policy 11-1 states:
Maple Ridge will collaborate with agencies, including the Agricultural Land Commission
and the Greater Vancouver Regional Board, and the community to develop a
comprehensive strategy to further community objectives. The comprehensive strategy
will include:
i) the completion of an agricultural plan that will form the foundations for the
comprehensive strategy, and will inform decisions regarding further studies, including
item (ii) and (iii) as follows;
ii) an Urban Area Boundary Review; and
iii) a commercial and industrial land use strategy.
-3-
This application has occurred in advance of these recommended steps and on this basis, should
be considered premature.
Agricultural Plan. An agricultural plan has been prepared for Council's consideration and prior to its
adoption, Council has requested clarification on specific points from the Agricultural Advisory
Committee. The policy work undertaken with the agricultural plan includes building on Council
direction as provided in the Official Community Plan. In particular, policy 6-12 a) states that:
Maple Ridge will protect the productivity of its agricultural land by:
a) adopting a guiding principle of "positive benefit to agriculture" when making land
use decisions that could affect the agricultural land base, with favourable
recognition of initiatives including but not limited to supportive non-farm uses,
infrastructure improvements for farmland, or the inclusion of land elsewhere in the
Agricultural Land Reserve;
This application does not address this policy consideration for positive benefits to agriculture. The
agricultural plan has not yet been adopted but is currently being reviewed by Council.
As this application is at odds with the Official Community Plan, and with the recommended process
for extending urban development outside of the urban area boundary, it is recommended that this
application not be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission.
Area Plan. In recognition of the strategic importance of these lands, Council is considering an area
planning process for the Albion Flats. Any review of development proposals should be made within
this context. It is generally recognized that the Albion Flats is important to the future of the
community, and greater consideration must be given to the highest and best potential land uses for
the area.
On November 9, 2009 Council received and discussed a report on an Area Plan process for the
Albion Flats. Council resolved to meet with the Agricultural Land Commission and would reconsider
the staff report following this meeting.
The Albion Flats has significant physical challenges, including watercourse protection, drainage, and
floodplain management. Infrastructure servicing would include stormwater management and the
inclusion of the site into the Fraser Sewer Area. Compensation for loss of agricultural land and
impacts to remaining agricultural land should be a consideration. These issues and their redress
should be identified through a comprehensive area planning process. In advance of this process, it
is recommended that exclusion applications on a parcel by parcel basis not be forwarded by Council
to the Agricultural Land Commission, as to do so could undermine the potential for meeting these
desired objectives.
CONCLUSION:
Council has been provided with options for processing this application. A discussion of the
implications of this application have been provided, based on the policies of the Official Community
Plan and the more recent initiatives that Council is considering. These initiatives include the
agricultural plan and an area planning process for the Albion Flats, where the subject property is
-4-
located. Based upon these considerations, the staff recommendation is not to forward the
application to the Agricultural Land Commission.
Prepared by: Diana Hall
Planner
Apprp ed b e Pic
ctor.
Approved ! Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
DH/dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Previous Correspondence from the Agricultural Land Commission
-5-
fi
Rem 5
Rem 4
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
Appendix A
Rem 3
P 7595
SCALE 1:2,500
City of Pitt
Meadows__
District of
Langley
=--FRASEA A-
C 0
0
0
23571/89 LOUGHEED HWY.
MAPLE RIDGE
Bniah Co umtla
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Aug 20, 2009 FILE: AL/060/09 BY: PC
Appendix B
August 13, 1998
Reply to the attention of Bruce Gunn.
Mayor Carl Durksen and Council
District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9
Dear Mayor Durksen:
RE: Albion Area ALR
Our File: #59-K-92-25551
As you may recall, on July 17, 1998 the Commission by Resolution # 454/98 excluded the
Wynnyk property (Lot 6, N.W.D. Plan 60014, D.L. 405, Group 1) located south of 104 th. Ave. in
the Albion Flats area of the District. As part of the review of this application (#25239) the
Commission considered the ALR designation of lands in the vicinity of the Wynnyk's site. Based
on its review, the Commission concluded that in addition to the exclusion of the Wynnyk's 5.5 ha.
site a further roughly 60.5 ha. in the southeast sector of the Albion Flats ought to be considered for
exclusion from the ALR (please refer to the attached map).
In arriving at this position the Commission considered a number of factors including:
▪ existing uses such as the current extensive municipal Fairgrounds Complex,
* the expansion and encroachment of Genstar's Cottonwood Subdivision onto adjoining
ALR lands,
• the exclusion of the Wynnyk's site and the likelihood of conversion of this site to urban
use, and
* the Commission's previous agreement in principle to consider "agri-industrial" uses for
Iots adjacent to the Lougheed Highway as per the 1993 Albion Area ALR Review (ALC
Res. #237/93) which was subsequently confirmed by the Commission in its review of the
Maple Ridge Rural Plan (Res. #780/97).
Finally, in relating this information to the balance of the land in the southeast sector, the
Commission felt that this roughly 29 ha. area vas isolated from other ALR lands and likely to be
negatively impacted by the existing and proposed developments as described above. Therefore,
the Commission concluded that this portion of the area along \vith the Fairgounds Complex (25.5
ha), the Genstar site (6.0 ha) and the recently excluded Wynnyk's site (5.5 ha) formed an
identifiable block of roughly 66 ha. which should be considered for exclusion from the ALR.
...2
Preserving Our Foodlands
District of Maple Ridge
August 13, 1998
Page 2
-The purpose of this letter is to inform the District of Maple Ridge and by copy of this letter to each
affected land owner, that the Commission. by Resolution #532/98. has determined that the lands
depicted on the attached map should be considered for exclusion from the Agricultural Land
Reserve. Further the Commission wishes to advise the District of Maple Ridge that they may wish
to submit a single block ALC exclusion application respecting this entire area as per Section 14 of
the Agricultural Land Commission Act. The Commission suggests that there are administrative
advantages to the District and land owners in adopting this approach. However, in the absence of
a single block application the Commission is prepared to consider exclusion applications from
individual land owners within the identified exclusion area.
Lastly, the Commission would like to thank District staff for supplying our staff with a map and
accompanying list of affected owners in order that we might provide all parties with notice of this
decision. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact Bruce Gunn, Planning
Officer at 660-7019 or Craig Sobering, Research Officer at 775-1493.
Yours truly;
AGRICULTURALND COMMISSION
L
per:
K. B_ Miller, Gei eral Manager
Mark f. T f Regional c.c. Mark Robbins, Regional Agroiogist
Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Abbotsford
BG/lv'✓7'i/Encl.
GREATER VANCOUVi
.G
Y
r e
41,
✓tM•
111114%:.
AVE.
REA TO BE CONSIDERED
OR EXCLUSION FROM THE
LR BY RES. # 532/98:
1.5 HA. (approximate calculation)
SEC.4
L. 405
MEI
EMI
411k4PM MEI
I I1V*
444::
'R4
•
MAPLE RIDGE
9rlikh Columbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE:
and Members of Council FILE NO:
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN:
SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit, Development Permit
20611 Lougheed Highway
November 4, 2009
DVP/058/09
D P/058/09
C of W
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A Commercial Development Permit application has been received for the above noted property to
support the renovation and expansion of the service bay, show room and customer service areas
and exterior facade upgrade of the Honda dealership building under the CS -1 (Service Commercial)
zone. This application is subject to the Development Permit Guidelines for Commercial development
as outlined in the 2006 Official Community Plan.
In support of the development application, the applicant has made application for a Development
Variance Permit to vary the height of the front entry element from a maximum 7.7 meters allowed
under the CS -1 (Service Commercial) zone to 8.7 metres to accommodate the Honda corporate
dealership design.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/058/09 respecting property
located at 20611 Lougheed Highway;
and further That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/058/09.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Teck Construction Llp Jack Hastings
Mary Jones Properties Ltd
Legal Description: Lot: 1, D.L.: 278, Plan: 87086
OCP:
Zoning:
Commercial
CS -1 (Service Commercial)
-1-
1104
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
b) Project Description:
Fitness Centre, Pub
CS -1 (Service Commercial)
Commercial
Tire Retail, Flooring Retail
CS -1 (Service Commercial)
Commercial
Westridge Shopping Centre
C-2 (Community Commercial),
CS -1 (Service Commercial)
Commercial
Vacant
RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Commercial
Car dealership
Car dealership
5528 m2 (1.36 ac)
Lougheed Highway, 119 Avenue
Full Urban
The proponent is proposing an expansion of the existing building and an upgrade of the fagade to
coincide with the updated Honda corporate branding. The proposal includes removing the existing
washing bays, currently located outside on the west side of the building, inside into the new
expanded service shop. The addition also includes a new customer service area and an expansion
to the existing show room.
The total required parking for this project is 102 stalls. The project exceeds this requirement and is
providing 107 spaces, 33 of which are located on an adjoining property owned by the proponent.
The proponent will secure the parking on the adjacent lot by way of a restrictive covenant. Access to
the subject property will remain the same with one access off of Lougheed Highway and one access
at the rear off of 119th Avenue.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
This development is subject to the guidelines applicable to Section 8.5 Commercial Development
Permit Area Guidelines of the Official Community Plan that aim to regulate the form and character of
development located within commercial area. This development respects the key guideline
concepts as outlined in this section.
-2-
1. Avoid conflicts with adjacent uses through sound attenuation, appropriate lighting,
landscaping, traffic calming and the transition of building massing to fit with adjacent
development.
The perimeter landscaping has been improved and the existing trees facing 119th Avenue have been
preserved in new landscaped islands on site. As this commercial upgrade is to an existing building
the site design has not been changed and will not affect adjacent development. No residential uses
abut this site.
2. Encourage a pedestrian scale though providing outdoor amenities, minimizing the visual
impact of parking area, creating landmarks and visual interest along street fronts
Landscaping has been provided along Lougheed Highway and the landscape plan includes
additional pockets of "green" throughout the parking area. The improved commercial architectural
design for the project increases the visual interest along the streetscape.
3. Promote sustainable development with multimodal transportation circulation, and low
impact building design.
The proposed development is an upgrade on the existing dealership on the subject property. The
expansion is occurring to the rear and side of the existing building and therefore does not negatively
impact views. The facade upgrade is of higher quality than its existing form which enhances the
Lougheed Highway corridor.
4. Respect the need for private area in mixed use development and adjacent residential areas.
There are no residential areas adjacent to this development, however, this project is moving the
washing bays from outside adjacent to the vacant lot to inside the building respecting any future
development that may occur to the west of the subject property.
Zoning:
The architectural feature at the front entrance of the building is 1 metre higher than the maximum
height allowed under the CS -1 (Community Commercial zone. This feature enhances the visual
interest of the building and substantially improves the existing building. This feature is also critical
to the Honda corporate image.
The applicant has made application for a Development Variance Permit to vary the height of the
front entry element from a maximum 7.7 metres allowed under the CS -1 (Service Commercial) zone
to 8.7 metres.
-3-
d) Advisory Design Panel:
The proposed project was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel on September 8, 2009 at which
time the following recommendations were made:
• The Panel would like to recommend that the applicant ensure the retention of all
existing landscaping on the site and that a landscape architect be retained for
the development permit drawings prior to submission of building permit to ensure
all existing landscaping is adequately protected.
In response to this, the applicant's Landscape Architect has, on the landscape drawing, indicated
the extent of all the existing landscaping. He has also identified, labeled, and sized the existing
landscape elements to ensure they remain.
• That the applicant consider providing weather protection over pedestrian entry
doors
The main entry doors are recessed into the entry element. The only other public access point, into
the parts and service areas, has a canopy as requested.
• That the applicant consider providing Alucobond panels in lieu of an exterior
insulation and finish system (EIFS)
This was done in consultation with the owner, however, Alucobond is roughly twice the price of an
EIFS system. In an effort to keeps costs down the applicant will be using EIFS.
e) Financial Implications:
A refundable security equivalent to 2.5 % of the estimated value of construction will be provided by
the developer to ensure that the development, including the landscaping, is carried out in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on an estimated
construction value of $1,372,500.00, the security will be $34,312.50
f) Alternatives:
Under Section 919.1 of the Local Government Act and Section 8.1 of the Official Community Plan
the property has been designated a Development Permit Area with special requirements for
commercial development. Council approval is required for the Commercial' Development Permit
prior to a Building Permit being issued.
-4-
CONCLUSION:
As the development proposal complies with the guidelines for the Commercial Development Permit
Area for form and character, it is recommended that VP/058/09 and DP/058/09 be given
favourable consideration.
Prepared by: Jen Csikos
Planrng Technician
Appr d by:
ening, CP, MCIP
Director • Planning
Approved by: ank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J. L. (Jin%) Rule
Chief 'Administrative Officer
JC/dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Site Plan / Rendering
Appendix C - Building Elevations
Appendix D - Landscape Plans
- 5 -
0
N
6563
9662
95
LOUGHEED HWy
Rem
3
Rem. 1
2
P 72179
LMP 20045
04
5 N
6
LMp 20045
SCALE 1:2,000
City of Pitt
Meadows
DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD
Rem 1
P9801
119 AVE.
A
P 76445
N
P 78869
P 87086
1
P 10201
LMP 1703
(LEASE PLAN)
0
803
AffericliY 4
P 69066
P 66429
300
11973
P 75912
11955
P 76445
B
11935
119 AVE.
Subject Property
P 25311
(P 87086)
0)
N
1
BCP 34169
9
P 75414
NWS 2959
P 75414
NWS 2745
District of
Langley
0
N
FRASER R.
N
RP 9591
11819
P
11910
11842
6
11836
4
11828
11820
G
20611-Lougheed Hwy
MAPLE RIDGE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Aug 26, 2009 VP/058/09 BY: PC
m
N
o
N
0 2
O 12013
/
/
30
20617
32
0
N
33
0
N
6563
9662
95
LOUGHEED HWy
Rem
3
Rem. 1
2
P 72179
LMP 20045
04
5 N
6
LMp 20045
SCALE 1:2,000
City of Pitt
Meadows
DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD
Rem 1
P9801
119 AVE.
A
P 76445
N
P 78869
P 87086
1
P 10201
LMP 1703
(LEASE PLAN)
0
803
AffericliY 4
P 69066
P 66429
300
11973
P 75912
11955
P 76445
B
11935
119 AVE.
Subject Property
P 25311
(P 87086)
0)
N
1
BCP 34169
9
P 75414
NWS 2959
P 75414
NWS 2745
District of
Langley
0
N
FRASER R.
N
RP 9591
11819
P
11910
11842
6
11836
4
11828
11820
G
20611-Lougheed Hwy
MAPLE RIDGE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Aug 26, 2009 VP/058/09 BY: PC
liffg
1
8
joie
x
210
W
z
-eQ
Cez<0
r
end;x �
11
3
!ib
1Q
Q.R
•
YMN9lH aiiN94p1§
7
41"
eTE
LAI
! 1
-4-
I
[
I
Js
•
A
z
0
i
i
•
r"
11
. . ; 1 �I
5 .
A/7'Mk01H
sig
MAPLE RIDGE
B,ielsh Columbia -.
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT: Variance Permit
24369 126 Avenue
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE:
FILE NO:
ATTN:
November 6, 2009
DVP/037/08
CoW
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A development variance permit application has been received for property located at 24369 126
Avenue. The purpose of the development variance permit is:
1. To reduce the minimum lot width for the RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone from
36 m to 35.5 m.; and
2. To allow a 6 m wide road carriageway on 126 Avenue rather than 7 m wide.
This application is in support of a 2 lot subdivision under the RS -2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) zone.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/037/08 respecting property
located at 24369 126 Avenue
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Existing:
Proposed:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Gordon Barthels
Gordon and Diana Barthels
Lot 69, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 43885
Estate Suburban Residential
Estate Suburban Residential
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
1105
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
Requested Variances:
b) Project Description:
Residential
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Estate Suburban Residential and Suburban
Residential
Residential
RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential) and
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Estate Suburban Residential and Suburban
Residential
Residential
RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Suburban Residential
Residential
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Estate Suburban Residential
Residential
Residential
8,130 m2 (0.813 HA)
126 Avenue
Suburban residential standard with sanitary sewer via
local improvement project
RZ/037/08 and SD/037/08
To reduce the minimum lot width for the RS -2 (One
Family Suburban Residential) zone from 36m to
35.5m. To allow a 6m wide road carriageway on 126
Avenue rather than 7m wide.
The applicant has applied to rezone the subject property from RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) to
RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential) in support of a 2 lot subdivision with lots not less than 0.4
ha. The application received Third Reading on February 24, 2009 and the applicants will be
requesting that Final Reading be granted once the conditions for Final Reading are met.
As part of the subdivision process, the applicant is seeking two variances, which are:
1. To reduce the minimum lot width for the RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone
from 36m to 35.5m.; and
2. To allow a 6m wide road carriageway on 126 Avenue rather than 7m wide.
2
c) Planning Analysis:
Zoning Bylaw
The minimum width required for lots within the RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone is
36m. The applicant is requesting to vary this requirement for a minimum width of 35.5m for both
lots. The minimum lot depths and areas comply.
Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw
Under the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw, the rural road standard for asphalt width is
7.Om. The existing asphalt width for 126 Avenue is approximately 6m. The Engineering Department
has reviewed the proposal and has noted that:
1. The roads in this area are adequate to provide for the existing traffic and to provide for this
subdivision.
2. The road right-of-way widths are sufficient in accordance with the Subdivision and
Development Servicing Bylaw Schedule B, Note 1(a) and (c), which states:
Where a highway right-of-way width is less than the required minimum provided for in
this Schedule, the Approving Officer may approve the subdivision where he is satisfied
that:
(a) all required services can be provided within a smaller right-of-way and
(c) the lands to be subdivided already abut on an open and travelled highway the width
and capacity of which, although not meeting the standard herein, need not be increased
to service either the subdivision to be approved or foreseeable potential subdivision of
other lands also abutting the said highway.
The Approving Officer is prepared to support clauses, Note 1(a) and (c) of the Subdivision and
Development Servicing Bylaw in order to approve this subdivision. Therefore, the request to reduce
the rural road standard asphalt width from 7.Om to 6.0m is supportable.
-3-
CONCLUSION:
The requested variances are minor in nature and do not appear to pose any negative impacts for
surrounding properties, therefore, it is recommended that DVP/037/08 be favourably considered.
Prepared by: Sarah Atkinson
Planniriri echnician
(5pprove J rqickering MCIP
Dire tor of PlanninL-
Approved .. Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
SA/dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Subdivision Plan
-4-
P 438
66
65
10
PART LYING EAST OF ALOUETTE RIVER
AND NORTH OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
0
w
0
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Appeidx ,
12581
12561
67
D_
Rem 64
12525
68
126 AVE.
P 43885
69
126 AVE.
12665
2 P 72087
1262
12580
12552
1
82
83
P 70798
OS
m
co
0
2
1
CO
0
3
P 72$85
80
79
2
12555
SCALE 1:2,500
City of Pitt
Meadows
125 AVE.
111.1.1 1
!ki
b
—
District of
Langley f[
ERASER R -
12640
72
12610
P 43885
73
12570
12550
2
12530
P 43885
75
P 43885
24369 126 AVENUE
MAPLE RIDGE
CowmSa
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ti
DATE: Oct 31, 2008 FILE: VP/037/08 BY: PC
i4ppeclx
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 69
SEC.22 TP.12 N.W.D. PLAN 43885
Scale 1:750
1
3041
RI
69
Pion
TOP OF
1
68
A,
0.406 ha
—
2.00—
I
L
L
12x12
35.55
J
43885
•
BANKCoven BaUn
—1.50
0.406
ha
N
35.55 1D
w
4.
1
5.8
J
2
Plan 72087
126 AVENUE
82
Wade & Associates
B.C. Land Surveyors
Maple Ridge & Mission
H2865-03 Phone 463-4753
Pion 1 72685
8. C. L.S.
August 26,2009
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: November 2, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: EO1-035-001
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A request has been received from the Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society to use municipal
streets for the annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park on Saturday December
5, 2009.
Authorization from Council is required in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By-
law 3136-1982" to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas
Festival in the Park on Saturday December 5, 2009, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule
'A' attached to the staff report dated November 2, 2009 are met.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society is requesting permission to use municipal
streets on Saturday December 5, 2009 for their annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas
Festival in the Park. The Christmas Festival events will be held in Memorial Peace Park from
4:00 pm to 8:00 pm. The Parade is scheduled from 6:00 pm to 7:30 pm.
The parade route begins on Dewdney Trunk Road at 221 Street, travels east to 224 Street,
and travels south on 224 Street ending at Selkirk Avenue. These events require the
following road closures:
• Haney Place road including Fraser Street to Dewdney Trunk Road (2:00-8:30 pm)
• 221 Street from 122 Avenue to Dewdney Trunk Road (4:00-7:00 pm)
• Dewdney Trunk Road from 221 Street to 224 Street (5:30-8:30 pm)
• 224 Street from Dewdney Trunk Road to Selkirk Avenue (5:30-8:30 pm)
It is anticipated that all the streets will be restored by 9:00 pm. A map showing the location
is attached.
1106
b) Strategic Plan:
Permitting of 'Maple Ridge street events promotes community development and often
highlights Maple Ridge's natural and built features.
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets may cause some delays and inconveniences to other
road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the event organizers. In addition, the
organizers will be distributing an information letter to affected businesses and residents.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP,
for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as
coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service).
e) Business Plan Implications:
The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal
streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff
processing effort.
f) Policy Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices.
g) Alternatives:
The District could refuse to permit the event to occur. In this event, the organizer would
have to cancel the event.
CONCLUSIONS:
From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events
and activities. Permission is requested for the annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in
the Park and conditons of Schedule 'A' are attached.
.410:111.4"
Submitted by:ew
Munic
ood PhD., P
al ,,neer/
Approved by: F -nk Quinn, MBA, PEng. —�
M: Pudic Works .& Develorsment Services
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
Schedule `A' To Council Memorandum Dated November 2, 2009
Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park
Condition of Approval
Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers:
1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the
R.C.M.P., and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District);
2. notify local Fire Department, and Ambulance Services of the event;
3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses;
4. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of
the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date);
5. notify surrounding businesses of pending road closures, by letter provided by the District of
Maple Ridge on behalf of the organizer;
6. must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times;
7. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out
of or in any way connected with the event;
8. obtain any required permits from the Maple Ridge Parks & Leisure Services Department
for park facility use if required; and
9. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability
insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST
have the following statement written in the policy:
"Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy
shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in
writing to the District."
Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy
shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the
Corporate Officer prior to the event; and
10. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which
existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction
of the District.
The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw permission to use
municipal streets for this and future events should the organizers fail to comply with the above
requirements.
Chief Administrative Officer
MAPLE RIDGE CHRISTMAS FESTIVAL SOCIETY
11925 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC. V2X 6G2
C/o Festivals office: Phone 604-467-7325 Fax: 604-467-7373
Ruby Tam
District of Maple Ridge
Engineering Department
11995 Haney Place,
Maple Ridge BC
V2X 6A9
October 22, 2009
Good day Ms Tam,
Please accept this letter on behalf of the Maple Ridge Christmas Festival society as our formal road closures
request, for the annual Christmas in the Park Festival, and Santa Claus parade to be held Saturday December 5,
2009. The information contained in this letter is the same as was discussed during the meeting in which Michael
Eng, Sgt. Roland Pierschke, Martyn Garner, Mark Smitton, Darlene Slevin, Dianne Enns, Ruby Tam and Art
Solomon attended on Wednesday October 14, 2009. The only new information is the No Parking times.
Please find a map of the parade route as discussed, for your approval and a draft copy of the layout of park
activity locations.
Road closures for the parade route require barricades in the following areas:
Fraser Street at Dewdney Trunk Rd. to Haney Place in Memorial Peace Park form 2:00 to 8:30pm.
Haney Place, including underground parking access to and from the park closed from 2:00 to 8:30pm.
221 Street between Dewdney Trunk Road (DTR) and 122 Avenue from 4:00 to 7:00 pm for parade marshalling.
DTR between 221 Street and 224 Street between 5:30 and 7:30 pm for parade travel.
224 Street between Selkirk Ave and DTR from 5:30 to 8:30 pm.
119 Ave closed at 224 Street from 5:30 to 8:30 pm.
Selkirk Ave between 223 Street and 224 Street from 5:30 to 8:30 pm, including all lane and parking lot access on
to Selkirk.
Steps will be taken to ensure no interference to BC Ambulance dispatch centre during this time.
All lanes between DTR and Selkirk Ave closed at 224 Street from 5:30 to 8:30 pm.
McIntosh will be closed at 224th Street from 5:30 to 8:30 pm.
There will be no parking along DTR between 221 Street and 224 Street from 5:00 and 8:30 pm for parade travel.
There will be no parking along 224th Street between DTR and Selkirk from 5:00 to 8:30pm.
There will be no parking along Selkirk Ave between 223`d and 224th Street between 5:00 and 8:30 pm.
All possible steps to open the streets as soon as safely possible, following the parade, will be taken.
We apologize for any inconvenience this road closure may cause, and thank you for your co-operation. If you
have any questions please contact Art Solomon at 604-219-9027.
Sincerely
Art Solomon
Chair, Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society
a3
U
o • `o
U U
2a3
0 0
a) a)
-a
a3 ca
c� c'3
0_ CL
Parade Route
•
0
O
0
N
0 0
0 0
0
o�
O EE
co 0
ti w
E a'
o `)
0
a)
U3
0
� 3
o a
m
— o
w
p c
m cc
2
a> m
a_
O
-°o `o
• ui
m E
o0_2
Z , ,
0
0
rn
N
N
E
o
U 0 Q
a�QE
o
ai
ai -a
H al
E
>��
W (n w
z
1-
>-
w
z
0
w
IS NSG VO
1S £ZZ
IS VZV1d
IS 2id8Nna
v321v
A18W3SSV
1S £ZZ
w
Cn
IS 6ZZ
SELKIRK AVE
IS ZZZ
SELKIRK AVE
I
C
SSVdAS
A3NVH
4
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: October 7, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO: 0540-20-01/BAC01
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole
SUBJECT: Bicycle Advisory Committee Bylaw No. 6682-2009
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At the September 2009 meeting of the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC), a motion was passed to
request that Council consider an amendment to the BAC By -Law to include an additional citizen at
large representative for the City of Pitt Meadows. Current membership includes: one citizen at large
representative for Pitt Meadows, two citizens at large representatives for Maple Ridge and one
representative from the Vancouver Area Cycling Coalition (VACC). The current diversity of
membership has proven to effectively create a forum for discussion, information sharing, problem
solving, joint planning, coordination and collaboration to address cycling issues in both communities.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Bylaw No. 6682-2009 be given first, second and third readings.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The mandate of the Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Bicycle Advisory Committee is to advise both
Councils on cycling issues in the community and implementation of the Maple Ridge -Pitt
Meadows Bikeways Plan.
b) Desired Outcome:
The goal of this recommendation is to increase the effectiveness of BAC by expanding the
forum for discussion, information sharing, joint planning, coordination and collaboration.
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Gather information from the public through TransLink, VACC and BEST.
d) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
There are no financial implications of expanding the membership of the committee. There
would however, be benefits to the communities of Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows by
encouraging an information sharing and problem solving relationship.
Page 1 of 2
1107
CONCLUSIONS:
The Bicycle Advisory Committee is recommending that Council consider amending the Bicycle
Advisory Committee By -Law composition to expand the membership of the committee. This would
create greater opportunities for discussion, information and resource sharing and for addressing
cycling issues in both communities.
K.
11I.l144,c,V
Prepared by: Tracy Ca mire, Committee Clerk
•
rdved b
Pp y: Russ Carmichael,
Director of Engineering Operations
Concurrence: J.L; (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
/tc
Page 2 of 2
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6682-2009
A Bylaw to amend Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Bicycle Advisory Committee Bylaw No. 5510-
1996
WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Bicycle Advisory Committee Bylaw
No. 5510-1996;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
enacts as follows:
1. This Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Bicycle
Advisory Committee Amending Bylaw No. 6682-2009"
2. "Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Bicycle Advisory Committee Bylaw No. 5510-1996" is
amended by:
(a) Updating the Definitions section with the following:
• Any reference made to the District of Pitt Meadows and the
Corporation of the District of Pitt Meadows change to "City of Pitt
Meadows".
• "Councils" means the Council of the District
Council of the City of Pitt Meadows
• "Maple Ridge" means the geographical area
Maple Ridge
• "Pitt Meadows" means the geographical area
Meadows
(b)
of Maple Ridge and the
known as the District of
known as the City of Pitt
deleting Section 5 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
5. The Committee is comprised of seven (7) Members as follows:
(a) one Councillor from the District of Maple Ridge who
has an interest in cycling;
(b) one Councillor from the City of Pitt Meadows who has
an interest in cycling;
(c) "one representative from the Vancouver Area Cycling
Coalition (VACC)."
(d) three Members -at -Large who reside in Maple Ridge;
(e) "two Members -at -Large who reside in Pitt Meadows."
(c) Deleting Section 7. in it's entirety and replacing it with the following:
"The representative from the VACC (Vancouver Area Cycling Coalition)
is appointed bi-annually by the VACC (Vancouver Area Cycling
Coalition)"
(d) Deleting Section 22 in it's entirety and replacing it with the following:
"The Committee will conduct its meetings in accordance with
parliamentary rules of procedure, provided such procedures do not
contravene the Community Charter, District by-laws or other
legislations".
(e) Deleting Section 23 in it's entirety.
(g) Add the following after Section 28:
29. "When the member's declaration is made, the person
recording the minutes of the meeting must record the
member's declaration, the reasons given for it, and
times of the member's departure from the meeting
room, and if applicable, the member's return."
(h) and that the sections be renumbered accordingly.
READ a first time the , 2009.
READ a second time the , 2009.
READ a third time the , 2009.
RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED this
, 2009.
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: October 29, 2009
and Members of Council FILE NO:
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Development Cost Charges Imposition Amending Bylaw No. 6705-2009
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This bylaw amends our Development Cost Charges (DCCs) to reflect current construction costs and
land prices and updates to proposed capital projects. It is consistent with our Official Community
Plan and will require a Financial Plan Bylaw amendment. This is intended to be a minor amendment
and does not revisit development assumptions, any broad policy changes or underlying DCC
assumptions which would be considered a major amendment. Due to a reduction in current
construction costs the proposed rates are generally lower in all areas except rural residential. The
water component of the DCC charges is higher due to water supply capital projects being installed by
the region which Maple Ridge is responsible for a portion of the costs. The drainage component of
costs in the Infill Area has been reduced significantly with the reduction of costs due to grant being
received for a pump station in Hammond.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That Maple Ridge Development Cost Imposition Amending Bylaw No. 6705-2009 be read a first,
second and third time, and
That staff be instructed to forward Bylaw No. 6705-2009 to the Inspector of Municipalities for
approval, and
That staff be instructed to amend the 2009-2013 Financial Plan Bylaw to align to the proposed
Development Cost Imposition Charge Amending Bylaw No. 6705-2009.
DISCUSSION:
As our community grows, there is an increasing demand for a wide range of infrastructure. We have
no mechanism in place to cover costs related to some types of infrastructure, notably public safety
buildings and libraries. Development Cost Charges (DCCs) provide the authority to recover
development related costs for roads, sewers, drainage and water works as well as parkland
acquisition and development. DCCs allow us to apportion the costs of certain types of infrastructure
among land developers.
The DCC rates are the outcome of a complex model involving the planning and costing of future
infrastructure projects, and projecting of future development activity. The assumptions used in
these models are amended as required to keep pace with changes to the underlying plans.
1131
It is a recommended best practice to annually consider if any minor amendments are needed to
reflect current construction costs, land values, status of grants and changes due to the annual
review of the Financial Plan. The current economic condition did result in a softening of construction
costs. The costs in the previous bylaw were from early 2007 when prices were higher so an update
is warranted. Additionally, there are DCC funded projects approved throughout the year by Council or
added as part of the 2010-2014 business planning process through the Capital Planning Committee
that are to be included in this amendment.
This bylaw update also includes projects removed from the DCC rate calculation due to the projects
being completed or funded by grants such as the grant that was received for the Lower Hammond
Pump Station. Projects added to this bylaw include roadwork on 232 Street between 124 Avenue
and 128 Avenue, a park in the area of 221 Street and 119 Avenue, park improvements in the Albion
Area and several other projects totaling about four million dollars.
a) Background Context:
Our current Development Cost Charge Imposition Bylaw No. 6262-2007 was adopted on March
11, 2008. It was the first major amendment since 1996. A commitment was made to more
regularly address amendments to ensure that charges reflect current costs and remove the
likelihood of larger increases and to provide more rate stability and certainty.
Introduction to Development Cost Charges
Development Cost Charges are funds collected at the time of subdivision or issuance of a
building permit to assist the municipality in the provision of infrastructure and open space
requirements required in support of development. The bylaw must be consistent with the Official
Community Plan and the Financial Plan.
The growth management strategy included in the Official Community Plan is a key element in the
methodology considerations in that it outlines future population projections and land use
designations. The areas of development or redevelopment are identified in this bylaw as the
Growth, In -fill, Town Centre Commercial and Rural Areas. Within each of these areas, the
amount of residential, commercial, industrial, institutional and agricultural development
potential is calculated, as are the estimated costs for providing the infrastructure. The
associated costs are then apportioned to ensure that the cost burden is distributed between
existing and proposed development.
In addition, municipal assist factors are applied to each service component to reflect the
municipality's financial contribution (funding assistance). Based on an assessment of all
pertinent considerations, development cost charge levies are calculated for the various types of
development in each of the areas and form a part of the bylaw.
Development Cost Charges are necessary to fund a portion of the costs related to infrastructure
needs due to new development. If municipalities had to fund the entire costs of the off-site
infrastructure property taxes would be significantly increased and development at times would
have to be turned down due to the inability to pay for the costs that result. DCCs were created
specifically to address these items. In the Best Practices Guide created by a large cross section
of stakeholders including representatives from the development community, it is noted that "The
development industry understands that growth creates new demand for local government
infrastructure and services. The industry also understands that local governments are not able
to directly absorb all growth related service costs, and that growth itself should assist in funding
service needs."
There is some uncertainty as to the timing of DCC collections the next two sections highlight how
the timing difference of collections and costs are addressed.
DCC Reserves
A reserve projection model is prepared for each component (roads, sewers, drainage, water and
parkland) and is subject to fluctuation in the amounts of DCC collections in each period and
timing of the expenditure of planned capital projects. The scheduling of projects will be adjusted
based on funding available. The recent approval for borrowing for the bridge over Kanaka Creek
on 240 Street will be borrowed externally when the funds are needed and until this time will be
covered off by existing DCC funds. Future borrowing consideration will include the urgent need
for the project to proceed and the risk of relying on future DCC collections to cover debt
payments.
Debt Financing
As discussed with Council previously, debt financing can be a useful tool to strategically advance
capital projects. Borrowing would allow us to finance growth related infrastructure projects using
DCCs as the source of funding for debt payments. Committing future cash flows, especially ones
that are not certain and fluctuate, adds an element of risk that will have to be carefully
considered. All borrowings will require the assent of the electorate. The Inspector of
Municipalities will only consider approving the inclusion of interest costs in exceptional
circumstances, which are fairly narrowly prescribed.
With the next major DCC amendment there are several additional factors that will need to be
considered. New legislation introduced the exemption for small residential units and the ability
to reduce DCCs due to "green" initiatives. The development of an intensive agriculture levy was
introduced in the last major amendment but abandoned.
Small Housing Units Mandatory Exemption
The province introduced Bill 27 exempting small residential units of 29 square meters (312 sq.
ft.) or less from paying DCCs. There is a process to increase this threshold from 29 square
meters. Any such change would require significant analysis to extrapolate the increased
demands on infrastructure requirements, other land use issues and the impact to others that
would have to carry the costs that would have otherwise been paid through DCCs.
DCC Discretional Waivers or Exemptions
Bill 27 also allows for exemption of "green" developments which include 'for profit' affordable
rental housing, subdivisions of small lots designed to result in low greenhouse gas emissions
and developments designed to result in low environmental impact. Analysis would be required to
determine the amount of potential waivers as existing development (General Revenue) would
have to make up the lost revenue. Any change would be a shift in policy from the current user
pay philosophy and would require a review on the impact to infrastructure requirements, a bylaw
specifically identifying what would qualify for an exemption and a major DCC amendment.
Intensive Agriculture Levy
During the last major amendment there was interest in exploring a development cost charge for
intensive agricultural development. This was excluded to allow more time to explore the issue
and more opportunity for consultation. Such a levy can be considered again during next major
bylaw amendment.
1
J
b) Desired Outcome:
A DCC Bylaw that is consistent with the Official Community Plan and our Financial Plan ensuring
the DCC rates are reflective of the costs of the infrastructure and open space needs required to
support development.
c) Developer/Customer Implications:
A comparison between the proposed levies and the levies currently in effect is shown in
Attachment "A" and Attachment "B" provides an indication of how the proposed levies compare
with what other communities charge.
Due to the fact rates are decreasing and that the development community is actively inquiring
about rate reductions there has not been an extensive stakeholder process.
Grace periods and in -stream applications are important policy issues to be considered when
levies are amended. Section 943 of the Local Government Act provides some protection to the
development community for in -stream subdivision applications for a period of 12 months after a
new bylaw is adopted. For that period the levies of the previous bylaw operate. Since levies
have decreased it is anticipated developers will not want this grace period for in -stream
subdivision applications. They can request to have the current rates apply once the bylaw is
adopted; staff will make available a form letter to expedite the process.
d) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The bylaw is consistent with the District's Financial Sustainability Policies. Our Financial Plan
Bylaw will need to be updated to be consistent with the amendments made to this DCC Bylaw. A
complete list of capital projects that are included in the DCC rate calculations is included in
Attachment "C".
e) Policy Implications:
The capital works program is the corporate mechanism for identifying and scheduling capital
projects consistent with growth strategies, the Official Community Plan and the Financial Plan
Bylaw. The Ministry of Community Services publication entitled Development Cost Charge Best
Practices Guide (Edition 3) guides the preparation of bylaws based on best practices guidelines,
local government policy and current information.
f) Alternatives:
Leaving the existing bylaw and rates as currently approved would leave rates higher and not
send any relief to developers due to reduced construction costs. It would also mean that any
new projects planned to be funded from DCCs would need to find alternative funding sources.
This alternative is not recommended.
4
CONCLUSIONS:
This minor amendment to the DCC Bylaw is the first amendment since the DCC Bylaw was
restructured two years ago to be consistent with the updated OCP. This minor amendment is largely
in response to decreased construction cost but also allows for minor amendments to the
composition of the planned projects. Giving Bylaw No. 6705-2009 the first three readings and
forwarding it to the Inspector of Municipalities are the next steps required to allow a revision in the
DCC charges and include other minor updates to the projects.
Prepared by: Trevor on, BBA, CGA
Manager of Financial Planning
t
Paul Gill, BBA, GGA
G - orpora& Financial Services
Concurrence: J.L. (im) Rule
Chi- Administrative Officer
Reviewed by: Andrew Wood, PhD., PEng.
Municipal Engineer
Change In Levy
$ (1,842) (9%)
$ (1,291) (8%)
$ (768) (8%)
$ (4.82) (13%)
$ (2,564) (10%)
$ (4,550) (7%)
$ (1,038) (6%)
$ (589) (4%)
$ (285) (3%)
$ (4.11) (14%)
$ (2,611) (39%)
$ 1.21 11%
$ (2,473) (39%)
$ 0.66 4%
$ (2,611) (39%)
$ 5 0%
$ 588 6%
$ (6.29) (23%)
$ (0.98) (11%)
Attachment "A" - Current vs. Proposed DCC Levies
Land Use Types
Growth Area
Residential Low Density -Single Family
Residential Low Density - Townhouse
Residential High Density -Apartment
Commercial
Commercial - Drainage
Institutional
In -fill Area
Residential Low Density - Single Family
Residential Low Density - Townhouse
Residential High Density - Apartment
Commercial
Commercial - Drainage
Industrial
Industrial - Drainage
Town Centre Area
Commercial
Commercial - Drainage
Rural
Residential 1
Residential 2 (Water)
Commercial
Industrial
2
3
3
1
1
1
2
3
2
3
2
3
1
1
2
2
Current Levies
BL 6462-2007
$20,603
$16,830
$9,652
$36.11
$24,920
$66,644
$17,437
$13,344
$8,179
$29.11
$6,616
$10.77
$6,267
$17.32
$6,616
$8,762
$9,278
$27.31
$8.97
Proposed Levies
BL 6705-2009
$18,761
$15,539
$8,884
$31.29
$22,356
$ 62,094
$16,399
$12,755
$7,894
$25.00
$4,005
$11.98
$3,794
$17.98
$4,005
$8,767
$9,866
$21.02
$7.99
1. DCC per additional lot being subdivided or unit being built
2. DCC per sq. meter of building floor area
3. DCC per hectare of gross site area
Attachment "B" - DCC Rate Comparison
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES
SINGLE FAMILY
Name
Water Sewer Drainage Roads Parks Total
Abbotsford (least dense 1/7)
Mission
Richmond
Chilliwack
Coquitlam (parcel > 375m)
Surrey
Langley Township
Abbotsford (14-16 units per ha)
Maple Ridge (growth)
Coquitlam (parcel < 375m)
Maple Ridge (infill)
Port Coquitlam (Area 2)
Abbotsford (most dense 7/7)
Pitt Meadows
New Westminster
Port Coquitlam (Area 1)
APARTMENT
Name
1,490 3,088 1,155 13,595 10,914 30,242
6,497 4,348 6,982 5,560 3,717 27,105
713 1,812 3,777 6,183 12,363 24,848
2,139 2,177 698 15,261 1,927 22,202
1,943 568 4,763 9,261 7,053 23,588
1,858 2,178 3,740 12,861 5,238 25,875
1,740 746 1,476 8,594 9,079 21,635
1,014 2,103 619 9,256 7,431 20,423
1,715 151 1,644 10,741 4,510 18,761
1,480 433 3,629 7,056 5,374 17,972
572 153 396 12,144 3,134 16,399
253 261 2,225 13,192 368 16,299
792 1,643 440 7,231 5,805 15,911
574 430 913 4,933 2,751 9,601
560 - 2,400 2,560 1,960 7,480
119 114 454 2,825 3,132 6,644
Water Sewer Drainage Roads Parks Total
Langley Township
Surrey
Chilliwack
Port Coquitlam (Area 2)
Mission, Cedar Valley
Richmond
Abbotsford *
Maple Ridge (growth)
Coquitlam *
Maple Ridge (infill)
Mission, Central
Pitt Meadows
Port Coquitlam (Area 1)
New Westminster
1,367 586 1,012 7,492 7,134 17,591
1,074 1,254 893 6,717 5,558 15,495
1,258 1,281 360 11,515 995 15,409
304 203 1,584 11,705 210 14,006
3,933 2,841 1,745 2,835 1,231 12,584
475 1,435 1,292 2,850 5,700 11,752
490 1,015 419 3,920 3,592 9,437
857 76 185 4,834 2,932 8,884
905 265 1,156 2,310 3,285 7,920
286 77 29 5,465 2,037 7,894
3,236 2,255 828 586 6,904
305 228 258 2,960 2,751 6,502
142 89 324 2,506 1,788 4,849
260 - 870 1,410 920 3,460
* Rate is based on Gross Floor Area (GFA) for comparative purposes 950 sq. feet is used.
Attachment "B" DCC Rate Comparison (cont.)
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES
COMMERCIAL (per sq. meter of gross floor area)
Name Cost
Mission
Port Coquitlam (Area 2)
Richmond
New Westminster
Surrey (1st floor)
Surrey (all non -ground floors)
Abbotsford
Coquitla m
Langley Township
Port Coquitlam (Area 1)
Maple Ridge (Growth)
Pitt Meadows
Chilliwack
Maple Ridge (Infill)
Maple Ridge (Town Centre)
198.13
179.39
107.77
99.00
98.86
57.16
94.16
60.43
53.46
40.37
36.88
32.54
28.30
26.00
18.98
ATTAC7-IMENT"C'
DCC PROJECT LISTING BYLAW NO. 6705-2009
AREA COMPONENT PROJECT NAME PROJECT YEAR DCC
GROWTH Drainage 102 AVE (240 gT- 244 ST) 7219 2020 499,669
106 AVE (180M WEST OF 245 ST - 245 ST) 7871 2020 47,877
132 AVE (236 - 239) 7202 2014 625,969
135 AVE (236A ST - 250M EAST OF 236A ST) 7803 2017 59,847
136 AVE (230 - 231) 7522 2020 35,909
138 AVE (236 ST - 150M EAST OF 236 ST) 7823 2017 35,909
223 ST (LANE SOUTH 117 AVE - NORTH AVE) 0461 2020 94,611
227 ST @ 250M SOUTH OF LOUGHEED 0902 2002 342,199
240 ST (109 - 114) 7210 2026 1,609,634
240 ST (130 AVE - 200M N 130 AVE) 7544 2017 57,067
240 ST (LOUGHEED -102) 0675 2005 883,659
240 ST (LOUGHEED - 102) PHASE 2 8159 2007 1,388,887
241ST (230M S 112 - 112) 7489 2016 55,059
244 ST (102 AVE -1028 AVE) 7887 2014 53,197
245 ST (105 - 106) 7867 2014 127,674
248 ST (108 - 220M N 108) 7501 2012 52,665
ALBION PARK DETENTION POND (244/102) 7218 2003 154,655
ALBION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT UPDATE 7934 2002 59,999
ANDERSON CREEK DETENTION POND (228/140) 0591 2015 223,707
ANDERSON CREEK STORM TRUNK (228 - 232) 7206 2015 723,081
BROWN AVE (227 - 228) 0453 2012 360,293
CATTELL BROOK DETENTION POND (227/134) 7208 2014 223,707
CATTELL BROOK STORM TRUNK (227 - 232) 7207 2026 2,048,730
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT DEBT PAYMENT - 2007 1821 2007 24,581
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT DEBT PAYMENT - 2008 1822 2008 27,346
DUNLOP CR DETENTION FACILITIES (243/110) 6116 2022 161,069
HENNIPEN CR DETENTION POND (240/129) 7199 2015 178,966
KANAKA CR DETENTION FACILITIES (248/113) 7214 2016 161,069
KANAKACR DETENTION POND (240/109) 7213 2018 223,707
M.MILLIONAIRE CK DETENTION POND(241/132) 7200 2014 134,224
MAGGY CR DETENTION FACILITIES (241/108) 6118 2017 134,224
MAGGY CR DETENTION POND (244/106) 6117 2022 178,966
N ALOUETTE RIVER DETENTION POND 232/132 7204 2012 161,069
SELKIRK AVE (226 - 227) 0463 2011 138,168
SOUTH COTTONWOOD STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT 0670 2004 131,247
Drainage Total 13,418,640'
Highways 102 AVE (240 - INDUSTRIAL) 0910 2019 650,472
102 AVE @ 241 ACQ. 1815 2017 491,399
102 AVE @ INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4211 2014 178,966
104 AVE (180M E - 350M E 240) 7483 2015 209,872
104 AVE (240 - 244) 1577 2004 553,399
104 AVE (244 ST -INDUSTRIAL AVE) 0911 2016 732,340
106 AVE (180M WEST OF 245 ST - 245 ST) 7868 2020 97,431
106 AVE (240 - 248) 2036 2020 1,132,708
108 AVE (248 - 249) 7502 2015 185,872
108 AVE (264 - 268) 0883 2018 113,447
110 AVE (240 - CAMERON) 0912 2018 1,450,595
112 AVE (240 - 248) 2050 2023 983,897
112 AVE (241 - 180M E 241) 7484 2015 193,493
112 AVE (300M W 248 BRIDGE) 0792 2022 1,724,221
116 AVE (ACQUISITION @ 234 ST) 2964 2017 974,866
116 AVE (BURNETT - 232, SOUTH HALF) 2078 2022 679,370
116 AVE (COTTONWOOD DR - 236) 0353 2026 904,409
119 AVE (226 - 227) 2763 2007 480,028
119 AVE (227 - 228) 0844 2014 652,974
122 AVE (222 - 224) 0742 2021 593,811
132 AVE (232 - 235) 6080 2007 946,977
135 AVE (236A ST - 250M EAST OF 236A ST) 7800 2020 122,372
136 AVE (224 - 400M E 224) 1230 2014 962,173
136 AVE (230 - 231) 7520 2015 144,877
138 AVE (236 ST - 150M EAST OF 236 ST) 7820 2020 71,321
203 ST (123 - POWELL) 7133 2010 421,038
203 ST (DTR -123) 2789 2010 1,378,569
203 ST (LOUGHEED - DTR) 2790 2014 115,893
216 ST (124 -128) 0797 2018 651,403
216 ST (LOUGHEED - DTR) 2798 2014 148,104
223 ST (BYPASS - LOUGHEED) 7270 2014 548,067
223 ST @ BYPASS TRAFFIC SIGNAL 7272 2015 173,000
223 ST @ LOUGHEED HWY (TRAFFIC SIGNAL) 7273 2006 68,055
224 ST (CALLIGAN - NORTH) 0786 2014 349,657
224 ST @ 124 AVE INTERSECTION SAFETY 1735 2006 151,515
224 ST @ N ALOUETTE RIVER (BRIDGE) 0194 2016 1,334,181
227 ST (430M N HANEY BYPASS - 650M N) 281,6 2000 69,778
ATTACHNFNT"C'
DCC PROJECT LISTING BYLAW NO. 6705-2009
AREA COMPONENT PROJECT NAME PROJECT YEAR DCC
GROWTH Highways 227 ST (650M N OF BYPAgS - LOUGHEED) 2815 2002 458,164
227 ST @ BYPASS TRAFFIC SIGNAL 7266 2010 110,362
228 ST (DTR - BROWN AVE) 0677 2020 19,914
232 ST (116 - SLAGER) 2823 2010 964,012
232 ST (132 - SILVER VALLEY RD) 2065 2017 749,067
232 ST (132 S - S ALOUETTE BRIDGE) 1970 2008 1,145,453
232 ST (S ALOUETTE - ABERNETHY) PH 2 #F0 2062 2017 567,399
232 ST (S ALOUL I 1 L - ABERNETHY) PHASE 1 2064 2009 272,889
232 ST (SILVER VALLEY RD - 141) 1222 2024 796,956
232 ST @ SILVER VALLEY RD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 2067 2017 246,078
232 ST BRIDGE (N ALOUETTE RIVER) 2066 2014 2,466,176
236 ST @ 131 (TRAFFIC SIGNAL) 2071 2017 164,052
240 ST (104 - MCCLURE) 2829 2014 1,175,437
240 ST (113 - DTR) 2830 2007 2,706,400
240 ST (113 - KANAKA CR BRIDGE) PHASE 1 7152 2014 811,611
240 ST (113 - KANAKA CR BRIDGE) PHASE 2 1672 2015 811,611
240 ST (130 - 135) 7161 2020 746,199
240 ST (DTR - 124) 0826 2022 1,139,626
240 ST (HEAPS ROAD - FERN CRESCENT) 7146 2023 2,335,621
240 ST (KANAKA CREEK BRIDGE S - MCCLURE) 1971 2011 1,399,330
240 ST (LOUGHEED - 104) PHASE 2 8310 2007 3,590,065
240 ST (LOUGHEED - 104) PHASE 3 2827 2006 1,200,456
240 ST @ FERN CRES (TRAFFIC SIGNAL) 2069 2018 299,769
240 ST @ KANAKA CREEK (BRIDGE) 2052 2009 3,198,470
240 ST @ S ALOUETTE (BRIDGE) 7145 2020 4,440,867
241 ST (230M S 112 - 112) 7485 2017 261,534
244 ST (102 AVE -102B AVE) 7884 2020 110,527
245 ST (104 - 105) 2040 2024 369,268
245 ST (105 - 106) 7864 2020 270,603
248 ST (108 AVE -112 AVE) 7142 2016 2,016,842
248 ST (108 AVE- 220M N 108 AVE) 7498 2021 180,379
248 ST @ 112 (TRAFFIC SIGNAL) 0800 2019 208,541
248 ST @ KANAKA CREEK ROAD (BRIDGE) 7140 2021 2,124,479
ABERNETHY (120M W 224 - 224) 2734 2015 48,658
ABERNETHY (210 - 500M E BLACKSTOCK) 2003 2009 1,343,867
ABERNETHY (216-500M E BLACKSTOCK) WIDEN 2225 2014 507,523
ABERNETHY (224-227) 2907 -2018 354,999
ABERNETHY (227 - 232) 2015 2018 562,746
ABERNETHY (BLACKSTOCK - 224) 2908 2008 398,274
ABERNETHY ACQ (210-224) 2905 2007 676,599
ABERNETHY PHASE 3 1696 2010 1,710,207
ABERNETHY PHASE 4 1697 2011 3,264,363
ABERNETHY PHASE 5 1674 2020 2,833,174
BROWN AVE (221 - 222) 2006 2024 639,932
BROWN AVE (227 - FLETCHER) 8312 2007 368,484
BROWN AVE (228 - BURNETT) 2010 2014 298,657
BROWN AVE (FLETCHER - 228) 2009 2014 1,488,044
BROWN AVE @ 224 ST (TRAFFIC SIGNAL) 4216 2013 119,310
BROWN AVE @ 227 ST TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4218 2021 119,310
BROWN AVE @ EDGE ST TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4217 2021 139,027
BROWN AVE ACQ. LAND (@ DUNBAR ST) 2031 2018 121,909
DEVELOPMENT EQUITY+ZONING PLANS (S.V.) 1507 2002 19,999
EDGE ST (DTR -121) 0739 2015 337,636
FERN CRESCENT (200 M EAST 236 - 244) #F0 7163 2017 1,665,507
FERN CRESCENT- (236 - 244) #F0 1220 2016 1,980,650
FERN CRESCENT @ 129 AVE (BRIDGE) 0960 2015 715,865
FLETCHER ST (DTR - BROWN) 0817 2019 153,742
FRASER BRIDGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 7894 2001 20,745
FRASER ST (150M N 116 - NORTH AVE) 0762 2015 279,803
HANEY BYPASS @ BURNETT ST PED OVERPASS 1814 2020 1,327,081
INDUSTRIAL AVE (102 AVE -106 AVE) 2051 2020 1,439,925
INFRASTRUCTURE REVIEW SILVER VALLEY 1506 2002 36,115
LARCH AVE (BALSAM - 236) 7840 2020 103,019
LOUGHEED (203 - 222) 4183 2018 314,707
NORTH AVE (BYPASS - 223) 2760 2014 317,057
RIVER RD (222 - 223) 0747 2014 91,616
RIVER RD (223 - 224) 0784 2014 120,206
RIVER RD (ACQ) 0746 2014 151,666
ROYAL CRES (225 - LOUGHEED) 0760 2014 418,825
SELKIRK AVE (225 - 227) 0841 2014 515,171
Highways Total
Park Acquisition CORE PARK (222/121) 3040 2014 2,699,997
MERKLEY PARK EXPANSION 0612 2015 573,059
MUSEUM PARK EXPANSION (LAND ACQ.) 1952 2007 196,361
219
A1TAq-IMENT"C'
DCC PROJECT USTING BYLAW NO.6705-2009
AREA COMPONENT PROJECT NAME PROJECT YEAR DCC
GROWTH Park Acquisition PARK (231/137f LOT 2 0826 2007 2,206.108
PARK (236/137) 0625 2014 4,888,884
PARK (241/112) LOT 2 0622 2008 1,393,331
PARK (248/108) LOT 2 0623 2008 3,076,941
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK- PARCEL 1 7174 2016 4,245,636
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK- PARCEL 2 7175 2016 12,960
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK - PARCEL 3 7176 2016 6,739
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK - PARCEL 4 7177 2016 22,291
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK- PARCEL 5 7178 2016 100,568
SILVER VALLEY NEIGH PARK ACQ 1927 2006 414,545
SILVER VALLEY NEIGH PARK ACQ A 0627 2012 455,999
SILVER VALLEY NEIGH PARK ACQ B 1926 2012 564,304
SILVER VALLEY NEIGH PARK ACQ SE HORSE 1925 2009 1,199,998
SILVER VALLEY NEIGH PARK COMPLETION 8153 2017 7,276,192
SILVER VALLEY NEIGH PARK PHASE 1 1954 2014 1,516,198
SILVER VALLEY NEIGH PARK PHASE 2 1955 2013 1,516,198
SW HANEY PARK 2878 2020 241,625
WHISPERING FALLS PARK (264/126) 0674 2014 812,580
WHONNOCK LAKE ACQUISITION 3619 2007 1,290,798
3620 2018 1,554,555
3623 2019 77,758
Park Acquisition Total '
Park Improvemt ALBION PARK (SPRAY PARK) 8193 2010 353,545
ALBION PARK (WASHROOM FACILITY) 6031 2013 152,739
ARTIFICIAL PLAYING FIELD (240/123) 1641 2006 1,353,534
CORE PARK DEVELOPMENT 7309 2014 248,888
PARK DEVELOPMENT (231/137) 7301 2014 248,888
PARK DEVELOPMENT (232/132) 7303 2006 128,527
7306 2017 248,888
PARK DEVELOPMENT (236/137) 7304 2007 248,888
PARK DEVELOPMENT (237/136) 7305 2013 264,444
PARK DEVELOPMENT (241/104) 7302 2012 264,444
PARK DEVELOPMENT (241/112) 7248 2014 248,888
PARK DEVELOPMENT (248/108) 7233 2015 248,888
PARK IMPROVEMENT SILVER VALLEY TRAILS 4197 2015 346,354
PARKS MASTER PLAN 6235 2008 32,542
SILVER VALLEY PARK IMPROVE 239A/130A 8297 2007 166,666
SKATE BOARD PARK (PHASE 2) 1953 2007 280,306
TELOSKY FIELD WASHROOM FACILITY 7238 2015 122,033
WHISPERING FALLS PARK DEVELOPMENT 7308 2014 186,935
WHONNOCK LAKE IMPROVE-WEIR 8298 2007 107,102
YOUTH ACTION PARK ALBION 8149 2013 359,094
Park ImprovemtTotal 5,611,593
Sewage
Sewage Total
Water
106 AVE (180M WEST OF 245 ST - 245 ST) 7870 2026 31,225
108 AVE (248 - 249) 7504 2010 29,963
135 AVE (236A ST - 250M EAST OF 236A ST) 7802 2016 43,367
136 AVE (230 - 231) 7521 2011 26,021
138 AVE (236 ST - 150M EAST OF 236 ST) 7822 2016 26,021
225 ST PUMP STATION UPGRADE PHASE 2 2738 2010 611,182
241 ST (230M S 112 - 112) 7490 2016 39,898
245 ST (104 -105) 7510 2013 77,098
245 ST (105 -106) 7866 2015 87,892
248 ST (108 AVE - 220M N 108 AVE) 7500 2015 38,163
BROWN AVE (FRASER - 227) 0231 2014 160,693
FERN CRESCENT (237 - 240) 1816 2013 601,384
MASTER SEWER - DEBT RETIREMENT (2007) 1801 2007 22,674
SANITARY IMPROVEMENT DEBT PAYMENT - 2007 1826 2007 30,396
SANITARY IMPROVEMENT DEBT PAYMENT - 2008 1827 2008 34,157
1,860,134
108 AVE (248 - 249) 7503 2014 46,164
112 AVE (240 - 245) 7159 2020 294,511
112 AVE (244 - 246) 3009 2013 282,363
112 AVE (248 ST - 400 M EAST 252 ST) 3015 2021 867,359
113 AVE (246 - 248) 3010 2013 168,146
128 AVE (235 - 238) 7546 2013 111,223
133 AVE (239 ST - 240 ST) 7168 2020 141,691
136 AVE (236 - 240) 3002 2012 778,487
136 AVE (BALSAM - 234) 2866 2015 52,051
136 AVE @ 24200 ROCKRIDGE RES. PHASE 2 0082 2010 562,193
224 ST (NORTH - 119) #F0 1565 2011 116,277
AREA
COMPONENT
GROWTH Water
Water Total
GROWTH Total
PROJECT NAME
ATTAO1MENP'C'
DOC PROJECT LISTING BYLAW N0. 6705-2009
PROJECT YEAR
232 ST ( SILVER VA L RD)
232 ST (SILVER VALLEY RD - 141)
232 ST @ 140 AVE PRV
236 ST PUMP STATION UPGRADE
237A ST @ 133 AVE PRV
240 ST (134 - 146)
240 ST (HEAPS ROAD - 128)
240 ST @ 135 AVE FOREST PUMP STATION
240 ST @ 146 AVE FOREST RESERVOIR
241 ST (230M S 112 - 112)
244 ST (102 AVE - 102B AVE)
245 ST (104 - 105)
245 ST (105 - 106)
248 ST (108 - 112)
248 ST (108 AVE - 220M N 108 AVE)
248 ST (112 - 116)
248 ST (116 - DTR)
263 ST (440 RESERVOIR - STAGE 2)
263 ST (440 RESERVOIR - STAGE 2) STUDY
BARNSTON / MR PS 2009
BARNSTON / MR PS 2010
BARNSTON / MR PS 2011
DCC PAYMENT TO JOINT SUPPLY SYSTEM, 2007
EMERG PRV SERVICE F/GRANT TO ALBION 158
GVWD RESERVOIR DEBT PAYMENT 2007
MAPLE RIDGE MAIN WEST 2009
MAPLE RIDGE MAIN WEST 2011
MAPLE RIDGE MAIN WEST 2012
MAPLE RIDGE MAIN WEST 2013
MILL ST @ 130 AVE PRV
PROVIDE WATER SERVICE TO ALBION 158 ZONE
SILVER VALLEY INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE
WATER IMPROVEMENT DEBT PAYMENT - 2007
WATER IMPROVEMENT DEBT PAYMENT - 2008
DCC
1 2 1 ..
0076 2015 340,036
1923 2017 50,450
6071 2005 502,082
7166 2022 143,172
7828 2018 781,726
3004 2018 844,233
0078 2021 178,966
7139 2021 381,999
7488 2024 62,093
7885 2018 49,025
7155 2021 115,842
7865 2018 129,585
3014 2016 478,399
7499 2016 53,454
0379 2015 422,117
3019 2012 422,117
0003 2010 594,009
1673 2009 15,041
2309 2009 156,314
2310 2010 519,836
2311 2011 799,748
1975 2007 498,380
3039 2007 61,971
2224 2011 72,799
7627 2007 28,850
2312 2009 726,011
2313 2011 622,295
2314 2012 1,036,794
2315 2013 829,727
7836 2022 190,280
2223 2011 367,198
1488 2002 69,999
1831 2007 8,713
1832 2008 9,791
15,095,192
153,332,309
AREA COMPONENT PROJECT NAME
FI L Drainage 224 5 1.25 -126
232 ST@122
234A ST (270M - 470M NORTH OF 112 AVE)
236 ST COTTONWOOD C TRUNK (112-113)
236 ST COTTONWOOD C TRUNK (113-115)
ALBION FLATS DRAINAGE PUMP STATION
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT DEBT PAYMENT - 2007
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT DEBT PAYMENT - 2008
HORSESHOE CR. CULVERT UPGRADE (@ 112)
LOWER HAMMOND PUMP STATION - PHASE 3
ATTACHMENT"C'
DCC PROJECT LISTING BYLAW NO. 6705-2009
PROJECT YEAR
DCC
8 X14
0432 2015 113,749
7461 2016 59,889
2822 2020 149,385
0880 2017 394,232
7848 2015 909,999
1821 2007 14,511
1822 2008 16,143
0967 2014 223,707
1974 2015 1,080,049
Drainage Total 3,193,576
Highways 102 AVE (240 - INDUSTRIAL) 0910 2019 295,337
108 AVE (264 - 268) 0883 2018 51,508
112 AVE (232 - 240) FINAL LIFT #F0 7074 2010 209,689
112 AVE (236 - 236B) 7037 2002 58,999
112 AVE (240 - 248) 2050 2023 446,724
112 AVE (300M W 240 - 240) 7058 2014 693,217
112 AVE (300M W 248 BRIDGE) 0792 2022 782,856
116 AVE (ACQUISITION @ 234 ST) 2964 2017 442,623
116 AVE (BURNETT - 232, SOUTH HALF) 2078 2022 308,458
116 AVE (COTTONWOOD DR - 236) 0353 2026 410,634
119 AVE (206 - 200M WEST 207) 7589 2014 248,508
121 AVE (70M W OF 240 - 240) 0861 2014 267,767
132 AVE (232 - 235) 6080 2007 429,961
136 AVE (224 - 400M E 224) 1230 2014 436,860
203 ST (123-POWELL) 7133 2010 191,166
203 ST (DTR - 123) 2789 2010 625,918
203 ST (LOUGHEED - DTR) 2790 2014 52,619
206 ST (250M N - 450M N DTR) 7481 2020 198,442
210 ST (117 - 118) 0729 2025 459,490
210 ST (118- LOUGHEED) 7117 2023 370,177
210 ST @ LOUGHEED (TRAFFIC SIGNAL) 1191 2021 178,966
216 ST (124 - 128) 0797 2018 295,760
216 ST (LOUGHEED - DTR) 2798 2014 67,244
216 ST @ 128 AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4209 2014 139,027
224 ST @ N ALOUETTE RIVER (BRIDGE) 0194 2016 605,764
227 ST (430M N HANEY BYPASS - 650M N) 2816 2000 31,682
227 ST (650M N OF BYPASS - LOUGHEED) 2815 2002 208,023
227 ST @ ABERNETHY TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4214 2016 197,166
228 ST @ COHO CREEK BRIDGE 1283 2022 715,865
230 ST (DTR - STOREY) 0743 2020 482,890
232 ST (112 -115) 7554 2015 248,791
232ST(116-SLAGER) 2823 2010 437,695
232 ST (124 - 128) 2216 2010 1,009,080
232 ST (132 - SILVER VALLEY RD) 2065 2017 340,102
232 ST (S ALOUETTE -ABERNETHY) PH 2 #FO 2062 2017 257,619
232 ST (SILVER VALLEY RD - 141) 1222 2024 361,846
232 ST @ 116 (SIGNAL) 2029 2014 84,174
232 ST BRIDGE (N ALOUETTE RIVER) 2066 2014 1,119,730
234A ST (112 AVE - 270M NORTH OF 112AVE) 0718 2014 169,873
238B ST (165M N OF 121 - ABERNETHY) 0366 2020 64,354
240 ST (104 - MCCLURE) 2829 2014 533,690
240 ST (113 - DTR) 2830 2007 1228,800
240 ST (113 - KANAKA CR BRIDGE) PHASE 1 7152 2014 368,500
240 ST (113 - KANAKA CR BRIDGE) PHASE 2 1672 2015 368,500
240 ST (DTR -124) 0826 2022 517,430
240 ST (HEAPS ROAD - FERN CRESCENT) 7146 2023 1,060,453
240 ST (KANAKA CREEK BRIDGE S - MCCLURE) 1971 2011 635,345
240 ST (LOUGHEED - 104) PHASE 3 2827 2006 545,049
240 ST @ 112 AVE (TRAFFIC SIGNAL) 2053 2016 123,860
240 ST @ 118 AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4212 2015 146,610
240 ST @ ABERNETHY TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4213 2018 139,027
240 ST @ KANAKA CREEK (BRIDGE) 2052 2009 1,452,217
240 ST @ S ALOUETTE (BRIDGE) 7145 2020 2,016,309
248 ST (108 AVE -112 AVE) 7142 2016 915,716
248 ST @ KANAKA CREEK ROAD (BRIDGE) 7140 2021 964,588
ABERNETHY (120M W 224 - 224) 2734 2015 22,093
ABERNETHY (210 - 500M E BLACKSTOCK) 2003 2009 610,162
ABERNETHY (216-500M E BLACKSTOCK) WIDEN 2225 2014 230,433
ABERNETHY (224 - 227) 2907 2018 161,182
ABERNETHY (227 - 232) 2015 2018 255,506
ATTACHIMENT"C'
DCC PROJECT LISTING BYLAW NO. 6705-2009
AREA COMPONENT PROJECT NAME PROJECT YEAR DCC
IN -FILL Highways ABERNETHY (BLACKSTOCK-224) 2908 2008 180,180
ABERNETHY ACQ (210 - 224) 2905 2007 307,200
ABERNETHY PHASE 3 1696 2010 776,493
ABERNETHY PHASE 4 1697 2011 1,482,135
ABERNETHY PHASE 5 1674 2020 1,286,359
ALBION INDUSTRIAL CROSSING PHASE 2 8046 2014 303,333
ALBION INDUSTRIAL PARK CROSSING 4193 2002 727,225
BROWN AVE (221- 222) 2006 2024 290,551
BROWN AVE (228 - BURNETT) 2010 2014 135,601
BROWN AVE (FLETCHER - 228) 2009 2014 675,624
BROWN AVE ACQ. LAND (@ DUNBAR ST) 2031 2018 55,351
COTTONWOOD DR (115 - 116) 7555 2002 623,035
COTTONWOOD DR (116 - 50M S 118) 2821 2020 459,603
COTTONWOOD DR (118 - 119) PHASE 2 1793 2006 240,954
COTTONWOOD DR (118 - 119) PHASE 3 8309 2008 606,060
COTTONWOOD DR (118 - 119) PHASE 4 1956 2009 666,666
DEWDNEY TRUNK @ BURNETT TRAFFIC SIGNAL 4219 2017 139,028
DEWDNEY TRUNK RD @ 210 ST TRAFFIC SIGNAL 7269 2007 121,277
DITTON ST (HAZELWOOD-CHARLTON) 0711 2017 866,757
FERN CRESCENT (236 - 244) #F0 1220 2016 899,284
FISHERMAN RD (MCKAY- 330M E MCKAY) 0780 2015 144,689
FRASER BRIDGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 7894 2001 8,379
INDUSTRIAL AVE (102 AVE - 106 AVE) 2051 2020 653,776
KANAKA WAY (23400 BLOCK) 7903 2019 694,913
LAITY ST (DOUGLAS - 128) 1026 2019 88,402
LORNE AVE (205 - 207) 0707 2022 606,666
MAPLE CRES (115 - WESTFIELD) 0703 2014 273,802
MCKAY ST (FISHERMAN - RIVER RD) 0779 2015 109,199
RIVER RD (TAMARACK - 240) 0778 2015 1,183,863
TAMARACK LANE (HWY# 7 - 270 M EAST) 1102 2017 365,991
Highways Total 41265,120
Park Acquisition ALBION SPORTS COMPLEX EXPANSION 0568 2015 399,999
1511 2015 299,994
8322 2015 2,933,330
BOUNDARY PARK (201/123) PHASE 2 0656 2014 902,499
MERKLEY PARK EXPANSION 0612 2015 209,638
MUSEUM PARK EXPANSION (LAND ACQ.) 1952 2007 71,833
NORTH CENTRAL PARK (232/122) 0665 2014 549,999
PARK (221/119) LOT 2 2316 2010 360,363
PARK (221/119) LOT 3 2325 2015 360,363
PARK (221/119) LOT 4 2326 2015 360,363
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK- PARCEL 1 7174 2016 1,553,150
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK- PARCEL 2 7175 2016 4,741
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK- PARCEL 3 7176 2016 2,465
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK- PARCEL4 7177 2016 7,915
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK- PARCEL 5 7178 2016 36,790
SOUTH HANEY PARK (230/113) 0607 2014 2,612,497
SW HANEY PARK 2878 2020 88,374
WHISPERING FALLS PARK (264/126) 0674 2014 297260
WHON NOCK LAKE ACQUISITION 3619 2007 472,203
3620 2018 568,691
3623 2019 28,446
Park Acquisition Total 12,120,913
Park Improvemt COTTONW00D CENTRAL PARK DEVELOPMENT 7310 2014 264,444
COTTONWOOD NORTH PARK DEVELOPMENT PH 3 1716 2005 232,323
COTTONWOOD WEST PARK FACILITIES 6017 2011 462,661
FIREFIGHTERS PARK (WAS COTTONWOOD E) 6018 2005 280,399
FIREFIGHTERS PARK DEVELOPMENT 6021 2001 291,250
FRASERVIEW PARK DEVELOPMENT 6015 2012 259,721
MERKLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTS 7298 2014 97,082
PARK DEVELOPMENT (232/132) 7303 2006 47,018
PARK DEVELOPMENT ALBION ELEMENTARY 8148 2013 299,999
PARKS MASTER PLAN 6235 2008 11,902
SKATE BOARD PARK (PHASE 2) 1953 2007 102,521
TELOSKY FIELD WASHROOM FACILITY 7238 2015 44,633
WHARF STREET PARK DEVELOPMENT 7952 2015 192,222
WHISPERING FALLS PARK DEVELOPMENT 7308 2014 68,385
WHON NOCK LAKE IMPROVE -WEIR 8298 2007 39,180
Park Improvemt Total 2,693140 40
AT[P/J-WENT"C'
DCC PROJECT IJSTING BYLAW NO.
AREA COMPONENT PROJECT NAME
6705-2009
PROJECT YEAR DCC
IN -FILL Sewage
Sewage Total
Water
Water Total
225 -ST PUMP STATION -UPGRADE PHASE -2
234A ST (270M - 470M NORTH OF 112 AVE)
MASTER SEWER - DEBT RETIREMENT (2007)
RIVER RD (232 - MCKAY) PHASE 1
RIVER RD (MCKAY- 236) PHASE 2
SANITARY IMPROVEMENT DEBT PAYMENT - 2007
SANITARY IMPROVEMENT DEBT PAYMENT - 2008
216 ST (124 -128)
224 ST (124 -ABERNETHY)
234A ST (270M - 470M NORTH OF 112 AVE)
263 ST (440 RESERVOIR - STAGE 2)
263 ST (440 RESERVOIR - STAGE 2) STUDY
BARNSTON / MR PS 2009
BARNSTON / MR PS 2010
BARNSTON / MR PS 2011
DCC PAYMENT TO JOINT SUPPLY SYSTEM, 2007
GVWD RESERVOIR DEBT PAYMENT 2007
MAPLE RIDGE MAIN WEST 2009
MAPLE RIDGE MAIN WEST 2011
MAPLE RIDGE MAIN WEST 2012
MAPLE RIDGE MAIN WEST 2013
WATER IMPROVEMENT DEBT PAYMENT -2007
WATER IMPROVEMENT DEBT PAYMENT- 2008
2738 2010 306,096
7460 2020 34,694
1801 2007 11,870
6181 2005 644,024
6152 2001 251,640
1826 2007 15,223
1827 2008 17,107
1,2g6,655
0016 2012 506,779
8074 2013 257,563
7459 2020 48,594
0003 2010 442,545
1673 2009 11,205
2309 2009 78,278
2310 2010 260,321
2311 2011 400,494
1975 2007 371,300
3039 2007 46,169
7627 2007 21,493
2312 2009 363,568
2313 2011 311,630
2314 2012 519,201
2315 2013 415,507
1831 2007 4,363
1832 2008 4,904
4,063,914
IN -FILL Total 64,617,917
ATTACHMENT"C'
DCC PROJECT LISTING BYLAW NO. 6705-2009
AREA COMPONENT PROJECT NAME PROJECT YEAR DCC
RURAL Highways 1_02 AVE (240 - INDUSTRIAL) 0910 2019 15,574'
108 AVE (264 - 268) 0883 2018 2,716
112 AVE (240 - 248) 2050 2023 23,558
112 AVE (300M W 248 BRIDGE) 0792 2022 41,283
116 AVE (ACQUISITION @ 234 ST) , 2964 2017 23,341
116 AVE (BURNETT - 232, SOUTH HALF) 2078 2022 16,266
116 AVE (COTTONWOOD DR - 236) 0353 2026 21,654
132 AVE (232 - 235) 6080 2007 22,674
136 AVE (224 - 400M E 224) ' 1230 2014 23,038
203 ST (123 - POWELL) 7133 2010 10,081
203 ST (DTR - 123) 2789 2010 33;007
203 ST (LOUGHEED - DTR) 2790 2014 2,775
216 ST (124 -128) 0797 2018 15,597
216 ST (LOUGHEED - DTR) 2798 2014 3,546
224 ST @ N ALOUETTE RIVER (BRIDGE) 0194 2016 31,945
227 ST (430M N HANEY BYPASS - 650M N) 2816 2000 1,671
227 ST (650M N OF BYPASS - LOUGHEED) 2815 2002 10,970
232 ST (116 - SLAGER) 2823 2010 23,082
232 ST (132 - SILVER VALLEY RD) 2065 2017 17,935
232 ST (S ALOUETTE-ABERNETHY) PH 2 #F0 2062 2017 13,585
232 ST (SILVER VALLEY RD - 141) 1222 2024 19,082
232 ST BRIDGE (N ALOUEITE RIVER) 2066 2014 59,048
240 ST (104 - MCCLURE) 2829 2014 28,144
240 ST (113 - DTR) 2830 2007 64,800
240 ST (113 - KANAKA CR BRIDGE) PHASE 1 7152 2014 19,433
• 240 ST (113 - KANAKA CR BRIDGE) PHASE 2 1672 2015 19,433
240 ST (DTR -124) 0826 2022 27,286
240 ST (HEAPS ROAD - FERN CRESCENT) 7146 2023 55,922
240 ST (KANAKA CREEK BRIDGE S - MCCLURE) 1971 2011 33,504
240 ST (LOUGHEED - 104) PHASE 3 2827 2006 28,743
240 ST @ KANAKA CREEK (BRIDGE) 2052 2009 76,582
240 ST @ S ALOUETTE (BRIDGE) 7145 2020 106,329
248 ST (108 AVE -112 AVE) 7142 2016 48,290
248 ST @ KANAKA CREEK ROAD (BRIDGE) 7140 2021 50,867
ABERNETHY (120M W 224 - 224) 2734 2015 1,165
ABERNETHY (210- 500M E BLACKSTOCK) 2003 2009 32,177
ABERNETHY (216-500M E BLACKSTOCK) WIDEN 2225 2014 12,152
ABERNETHY (224 - 227) 2907 2018 8,500
ABERNETHY (227 - 232) 2015 2018 13,474
ABERNETHY (BLACKSTOCK - 224) 2908 2008 9,536
ABERNETHY @ 210/132 ACQ 4194 2020 68,250
ABERNETHY ACQ (210 - 224) 2905 2007 16,200
ABERNETHY PHASE 3 1696 2010 40,948
ABERNETHY PHASE 4 1697 2011 78,159
ABERNETHY PHASE 5 1674 2020 67,835
BROWN AVE (221 - 222) 2006 2024 15,322
BROWN AVE (228-BURNETT) 2010 2014 7,151
BROWN AVE (FLETCHER - 228) 2009 2014 35,629
BROWN AVE ACQ. LAND (@ DUNBAR ST) 2031 2018 2,919
FERN CRESCENT (236 - 244) #F0 1220 2016 47,423
INDUSTRIAL AVE (102 AVE -106 AVE) 2051 2020 34,476
1.48;3,077
Highways Total
Park Acquisition MERKLEY PARK EXPANSION 0612 2015 27,968
MUSEUM PARK EXPANSION (LANDACQ.) 1952 2007 9,583
N ALOUETTE RIVER GREENWAYTRAIL 2304 2010 44,999
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK - PARCEL 1 7174 2016 207,207
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK- PARCEL 2 7175 2016 632
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK - PARCEL 3 7176 2016 329
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK - PARCEL 4 7177 2016 1,328
PORT HANEY WATERFRONT PARK - PARCEL 5 7178 2016 4,908
WHISPERING FALLS PARK (264/126) 0674 2014 39,658
WHONNOCK LAKE ACQUISITION 1948 2005 454,545
3619 2007 62,997
3620 2018 75,870
3623 2019 3,795
Park Acquisition Total 933,819
ATrPO7-IMENT"C'
DCC PROJECT LISTING BYLAW NO.
AREA COMPONENT PROJECT NAME
RURAL Park Improvem't N AL VETTE RIVER GREENWAY CROSSING
PARK DEVELOPMENT (232/132)
WEBSTER'S CORNER PARK DEVELOPMENT
WHISPERING FALLS PARK DEVELOPMENT
WHONNOCK LAKE IMPROVE - WEIR
WHONNOCK LAKE PHASE 3 PATH/LIGHT
WHONNOCK LAKE PHASE 4 BEACH/GENERAL
WHONNOCK LAKE PHASE 5 WASHROOM FACILITY
Park Improvem'tTotal
Sewage
Sewage Total
Water
Water Total
RURAL Total
Grand Total
MASTER SEWER - DEBT RETIREMENT (2007)
124 AVE (246 - 248)
263 ST (440 RESERVOIR - STAGE 2)
263 ST (440 RESERVOIR - STAGE 2) STUDY
BARNSTON / MR PS 2009
BARNSTON / MR PS 2010
BARNSTON / MR PS 2011
DCC PAYMENT TO JOINT SUPPLY SYSTEM, 2007
DEWDNEYTRUNK (260-262) 220M 220MM WM
GVWD RESERVOIR DEBT PAYMENT 2007
MAPLE RIDGE MAIN WEST 2009
MAPLE RIDGE MAIN WEST 2011
MAPLE RIDGE MAIN WEST 2012
MAPLE RIDGE MAIN WEST 2013
6705-2009
PROJECT
2215
7303
1074
7308
8298
6032
6075
1568
YEAR DCC
2009 49,500
2006 6,273
2003 199,204
2014 9,123
2007 5,227
2013 253,110
2013 303,262
2012 312,469
1,138,168
1801 2007 1,350
1,350
1599 2013 104,043
0003 2010 30,848
1673 2009 781
2309 2009 7,755
2310 2010 25,790
2311 2011 39,677
1975 2007 25,882
3039 2007 3,218
2220 2010 56,055
7627 2007 1,498
2312 2009 36,019
2313 2011 30,874
2314 2012 51,438
2315 2013 41,165
455,043
4,011,457
221,961,683
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6705-2009
A Bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Development Cost Charges Imposition Bylaw No. 6462-2007
WHEREAS Council does not consider the charges imposed by this bylaw:
a. As excessive in relation to the capital cost of prevailing standards of service;
b. Will deter development, or
c. Will discourage the construction of reasonably priced housing or the provision of
reasonably priced serviced land in the District.
NOW THEREFORE, the Council for the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Development Cost Charges
Imposition Amending Bylaw No. 6705-2009"
2. Schedules "B", "C", "D" and "E" of Maple Ridge Development Cost Charges
Imposition Bylaw No. 6462-2007 be deleted in their entirety and replaced with
Schedules "B", "C", "D" and "E" attached hereto and forming part of Maple Ridge
Development Cost Charges Imposition Amending Bylaw No. 6705-2009.
READ a first time this day of , 200
READ a second time this day of , 200
READ a third time this day of , 200
APPROVED BY THE INSPECTOR OF MUNICIPALITIES this day of , 200
ADOPTED this day of , 200
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
ATTACHMENTS: SCHEDULE "B", SCHDULE "C", SCHEDULE "D" AND SCHEDULE "E"
SCHEDULE "B"
Attachment to Bylaw No. 6705-2009
DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES - GROWTH AREAS (Map 1)
Single Family Dwelling/ Duplex DCC per additional lot being
Servicing Type subdivided or unit being built
Road $10,741
Drainage 1,644
Water 1,715
Sanitary Sewer 151
Open Space 4,510
Total $18,761
Townhouse
Servicing Type DCC per additional unit being built
Road $7,519
Drainage 1,644
Water 1,715
Sanitary Sewer 151
Open Space 4,510
Total $15,539
Ap partment
Servicing Type DCC per additional unit being built
Road $4,834
Drainage 185
Water 857
Sanitary Sewer 76
Open Space 2,932
Total $8,884
Commercial
Servicing Type DCC per sq. meter of building floor area
Road $21.02
Water $9.44
Sanitary Sewer $0.83
Open Space $0.00
DCC per hectare of gross site area
Drainage $22,356
Institutional
Servicing Type DCC per hectare of gross site area
Road $31,180
Drainage 14,122
Water 15,432
Sanitary Sewer 1,360
Open Space 0
Total $62,094
SCHEDULE "C"
Attachment to Bylaw No. 6705-2009
DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES - INFILL AREAS (Maps 1 & 2)
Single Family Dwelling/ Duplex
Servicing Type
Road
Drainage
Water
Sanitary Sewer
Open Space
Total
Townhouse
Servicing Type
Road
Drainage
Water
Sanitary Sewer
Open Space
Total
Appartment
Servicing Type
Road
Drainage
Water
Sanitary Sewer
Open Space
Total
Commercial
Servicing Type
Road
Water
Sanitary Sewer
Open Space
Drainage
Industrial
Servicing Type
oad
Water
Sanitary Sewer
Open Space
DCC per additional lot being
subdivided or unit being built
$12,144
396
572
153
3,134
$16,399
DCC per additional unit being built
$8,500
396
572
153
3,134
$12,755
DCC per additional unit being built
$5,465
29
286
77
2,037
$7,894
DCC per sq. meter of building floor area
$21.02
$3.14
$0.84
$0.00
DCC per hectare of grosssite area
$4,005
DCC per sq. meter of building floor area
$7.99
$3.15
$0.84
$0.00
DCC per hectare of gross site area
Drainage $3,794
SCHEDULE "D"
Attachment to Bylaw No. 6705-2009
DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES - RURAL AREAS (Map 1)
Single Family Dwelling/ Duplex (with water) DCC per additional lot being
Servicing Type subdivided or unit being built
Road $3,714
Drainage 0
Water 1,099
Sanitary Sewer 0
Open Space 5,053
Total $9,866
Single Family Dwelling/ Duplex (without water) DCC per additional lot being
Servicing Type subdivided or unit being built
Road $3,714
Drainage 0
Water 0
Sanitary Sewer 0
Open Space 5,053
Total $8,767
Commercial
Servicing Type DCC per sq. meter of building floor area
Road $21.02
Drainage 0
Water 0
Sanitary Sewer 0
Open Space 0
Total $21.02
Industrial
Servicing Type DCC per sq. meter of building floor area
Road $ 7.99
Drainage 0
Water 0
Sanitary Sewer 0
Open Space 0
Total $ 7.99
SCHEDULE "E"
Attachment to Bylaw No. 6705-2009
DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES - TOWN CENTRE COMMERCIAL AREA (Map 2)
Commercial (Town Centre)
Servicing Tyre DCC per sq. meter of building floor area
Road $ 14.00
Water $ 3.14
Sanitary Sewer $ 0.84
Open Space
DCC per hectare of grosssite area
Drainage $ 4,005
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE:
: NNov.02, 2009
T21-212-003
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN:
SUBJECT: Adjustments to 2009 Collector's Roll
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
BC Assessment has revised the assessed value for the 2009 Collector's Roll through the issuance of
Supplementary/PAAB Rolls 06, 07 and 08. The Collector is required to make all the necessary
changes to the municipal tax roll records and report these adjustments to Council.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
The report dated Nov. 02, 2009 is submitted for information.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Eight folios were revised.
One residential folio had the value of improvements removed as the house was demolished prior to
Dec. 31, 2008, one residential folio had the value of improvements slightly reduced to better reflect
current value, and three residential folios had a portion of their lands reclassified as farm. Two
residential class folios had the ALR exemption for school taxes reinstated, which has no impact one
municipal revenues, and the exemption was removed from a portion of a GVTA property previously
incorrectly exempted from taxation as part of the bridge/road network.
(Municipal tax changes: increase in residential class $8,348; increase in farm class $525)
b) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
There is a total increase of $ 15,333 in tax revenue of which the municipal portion is $ 8,873.
1132
CONCLUSIONS:
Our appeal in regards to a GVTA property being incorrectly exempted as part of the bridge/road
network resulted in increasing the residential assessment base by $4,661,000. This was reduced
by a $2,320,600 decrease which was the result of review of data and subsequent correction by BCA.
This review also increased the farm class assessment base by $22,960.
This report dated Nov. 02, 2009 is submitted for information and is available to the public.
t4ib
Prepared by: Silvia Ruttedg�
Manager, Revenue & Collections
4.`a
Approved by: ,ul G ll, B.B.A.; C.G.A.
General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services
( )
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer