HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-04-12 Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
April 13, 2010
7:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
MEETING DECORUM
Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are
decided at Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that
you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary
and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council
Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be
reprimanded.
Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mar)leridF-;e.ca
The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws
or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or
resolution.
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 OPENING PRAYERS
Pastor Eddie Bradley, High Way Church
300 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS
400 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
500 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
501 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of March 23, 2010
502 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of March 8,
12, 23 and 31, 2010
Page 1
Council Meeting Agenda
April 13, 2010
Council Chamber
Page 2 of 8
600 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
700 DELEGATIONS
701 Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Arts Council Presentation
• Roger Welch, President, Board of Directors
702 Volunteer Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows
• Ashley Singh, Community Volunteer Developer
800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
900 CORRESPONDENCE
1000 BYLAWS
COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
1100 Minutes - N/A
The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with
the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration
and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held
in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting.
Council Meeting Agenda
April 13, 2010
Council Chamber
Page 3 of 8
Public Works and Development Services
1101 RZ/035/08, 11307 and 11295 Maple Crescent, C-3 to M-3
Staff report dated April 6, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6666-2009 be given first reading.
1102 RZ/071/09, 12161237 Street, A-1 to RM-1
Staff report dated April 1, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6719-2010 be given first reading.
1103 RZ/072/09, 10175, 10121 and 10141 240 Street, RS-3 and RS-2 to
R M-1
Staff report dated April 1, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6732-2010 be given first reading.
1104 RZ/017/10, 12472 Laity Street, RS-1a to R-1
Staff report dated March 24, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6728-2010 to permit future subdivision into two
parcels zoned R-1 (Residential District) be given first reading and that the
applicant provide further information as described on Schedule (A-H) of
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
1105 RZ/018/10, 12580 243 Street, RS-3 to RS-2
Staff report dated March 30, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6734-2010 to permit a two lot single family
subdivision be given first reading and that the applicant provide further
information as described in Schedule B of Development Procedures Bylaw
No. 5879-1999.
1106 RZ/021/10, 9990 240 Street, RS-2 and CS-1 to RM-1
Staff report dated March 30, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6735-2010 to permit a townhouse development be
given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as
described in Schedule A, C, D and F of Development Procedures Bylaw No.
5879-1999.
Council Meeting Agenda
April 13, 2010
Council Chamber
Page 4of8
1107 RZ/022/10, 11523 236 Street, RS-3 to RM-1
Staff report dated March 31, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6733-2010 to permit a townhouse development be
given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as
described in Schedule A, C, D, F and G of Development Procedures Bylaw
No. 5879-1999.
1108 AL/010/10, 12616 248 Street, Homesite Severance (Subdivision) of Land
Within the Agricultural Land Reserve
Staff report dated March 30, 2010 recommending that application
AL/010/10 for homesite severance (subdivision) of land within the
Agricultural Land Reserve be authorized to proceed to the Agricultural Land
Commission.
1109 AL/020/10, 24227 Dewdney Trunk Road, Non -Farm Use Application in the
Agricultural Land Reserve
Staff report dated March 30, 2010 recommending that application
AL/020/10 for non -farm use to permit a wireless communications facility in
the Agricultural Land Reserve be authorized to proceed to the Agricultural
Land Commission
1110 SP/011/10, Soil Deposit Permit
Staff report dated March 15, 2010 recommending that application
SP/011/10 for a fill permit for District of Maple Ridge properties located at
the intersection of 104 Avenue and 105 Avenue be authorized to go
forward to the Agricultural Land Commission.
1111 Liquor Primary License - Extension of Hours
Staff report dated March 8, 2010 recommending that the extension of
operating hours to 2:00 a.m. on Sundays for the Haney Hotel liquor primary
license not be supported.
Council Meeting Agenda
April 13, 2010
Council Chamber
Page 5 of 8
1112 Local Area Service, 202 Street (Chatwin Avenue to Mclvor Avenue)
Staff report dated March 16, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge 202
Street Sanitary Sewer Services Bylaw No. 6692-2009 be given first, second
and third readings.
1113 Award of Contracts, Downtown Road and Utility Rehabilitation Project
Staff report dated April 7, 2010 recommending that Contract ITT-EN10-131
for Downtown Road and Utility Rehabilitation be awarded to Imperial Paving
Limited, that Contract ITT-EN10-137 for Supply of Streetlights, Traffic Signal
Poles and Accessories for the Downtown Road and Utility Rehabilitation
Project be awarded to Guillevin International Co., that the total engineering
services contract for ISL Engineering and Land Services be increased and
that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contracts.
1114 Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 140/10, 236 Street and
112 Avenue
Staff report dated March 19, 2010 recommending that Latecomer Charges
be imposed and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal
Latecomer Agreement LC 140/10.
1115 Race the Ridge 2010 Bike Race
Staff report dated March 31, 2010 recommending the use of municipal
streets be authorized for the Race the Ridge 2010 Bike Race on Saturday,
May 1, 2010 and Sunday, May 2, 2010.
1116 2010 Heart and Stroke Big Bike Ride
Staff report dated March 31, 2010 recommending the use of municipal
streets be authorized for the 2010 Heart and Stroke Big Bike Ride on
Friday, April 23, 2010.
Financial and Corporate Services includin Fire and Police
1131 Disbursements for the month ended January 31, 2010
Staff report dated April 1, 2010 recommending that disbursements for
January 2010 be approved.
Council Meeting Agenda
April 13, 2010
Council Chamber
Page 6 of 8
1132 Revenue Anticipation Borrowing Bylaw
Staff report dated March 23, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge
Revenue Anticipation Borrowing Bylaw No. 6729-2010 be given first,
second and third reading.
Community Develo ment and Recreation Service
1151 Webster's Corner Neighbourhood Park
Staff report dated April 6, 2010 recommending that the concept plan for
Webster's Corner's Neighbourhood Park be approved and that staff be
authorized to prepare tender documents for construction of the park.
1152 Policy on Council and Staff Liaison Roles
Staff report dated March 26, 2010 recommending that the Council and
Staff Liaison Roles Policy be adopted.
1153 Parks and Leisure Services Fees and Charges
Staff report dated March 12, 2009 recommending that Maple Ridge
Recreation Facility Fees Amending Bylaw No. 6727-2010 be given first,
second and third readings.
1154 SAFERHome Standards Society Municipal Membership
1181
Staff report dated April 1, 2010 recommending that the District of Maple
Ridge purchase a municipal membership with the SAFERHome Standards
Society.
Correspondence
Other Committee Issues
1200 STAFF REPORTS
Council Meeting Agenda
April 13, 2010
Council Chamber
Page 7 of 8
1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL
From the March 22, 2010 Special Closed Council Meeting
• Appointment of Geoffrey Johnston and Ann McAfee to the Pitt Meadows
Airport Society Board of Directors
1400 MAYOR'S REPORT
1500 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS
1600 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
1700 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING
1800 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Council Meeting Agenda
April 13, 2010
Council Chamber
Page 8 of 8
1900 ADJOURNMENT
QUESTION PERIOD
The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to
ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of
Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium).
Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual
members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes.
Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the
information required to provide a complete and accurate response.
Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings,
delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to
Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and
information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to
have a voice in the future of this community.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca.
Mayor and Council at ma orandcouncil@ma lerid .ca.
Checked by
Date: �
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
March 8, 2010
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Ernie Daykin, Mayor
Chairman
Frank Quinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary
1. DVP/068/08
LEGAL: Lot 1, District Lot 398, Group 1, New Westminster District
LOCATION: 22320 Lougheed Hwy
OWNER: CI Marquez Holdings Ltd, 0824188 B.C. Ltd, Canaan
Holdings Ltd, Daesan Holdings Ltd.
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Statutory Right -of -Way (road reservation)
THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING
DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO DVP/068/08.
CARRIED
Frank uinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
M e m er
N
Pd.1
Pd. D N
25
',01 26 N
27
28
18
RP 61574
co
co
11830
P 2899)
N
24
N P
899
P 28
9
LO
32
B
42 (P 2899)
38
,A,
o
d-
cLOo0 35
34
U
C c
c\1
Nco
0
co LP 77916
co
r r- 00C\j
�
M -
co
C�C r
N
N
co*PP081 co 0-
N
c
G co
co
N
J[
N
N N
N
J N
N
* [
P 2899
1 SUBJECT PROPERTY
LOUGHEED HWY
P 2899
R P 1741
E P 11040
co
N
Rem 43 Rem M B �
�
►�
co em
MM
Re
K-
N
45 N 4 E
co
N
E
N
� E'
N
44 co
co c
C
cc
48 48
49
R�
N
,.
22338
22346/48
22362/64
*LMP 29154
22356/58
Rem N
98
99
Cn
57 °-
"'
N
11768 It
P
50600
N
N
0
N
N
N
�s 3442
City of Pitt
N
44
11746
S
NDistrict of
Langley
SCALE 1:1,000
45
r
NORTH AVE.
'Rem Remo Rem Rem Rem
N 46 47 0- 48 49 50
1
C 22320 LOUGHEED HWY
rg '
�` of CORPORATION OF
i = THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE- MAPLE RIDGE
} ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT
= DATE: Mar 4, 2010 FILE: VP/068/08 BY: PC
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
March 12, 2010
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Ernie Daykin, Mayor
Chairman
Frank Quinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary
I. SD/048/09
LEGAL: Lots 57, 61, 65, 68, & 78, all of Section 32, Township 12,
New Westminster District, Plan BCP41713
LOCATION: 22956, 22980, 23100, 23120, 23140,
& 23150 Gilbert Drive
OWNER: Insignia Homes SilverValley Ltd.
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Subdivision Plans;
Covenants - On -Site Drainage; Exterior Finish; Party Wall;
Discharge of Building Scheme;
Cross Access Easement; On -Site Storm Easement
THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING
DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO SD/048/09.
CARRIED
9�_
Frank uinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Member
PARK
BCP 29120
29
IjS
139 A AVE.
17
13933
30
PARK 3927
31
[2�
19-0
16
a
BCP 10325
PARK
oN�
15
10325 3923
3g"
32
m
N BC
1
2
14
1
PARK lP 13917
23
24
25
26
27
28
39 os
13
33
$ F'
2 s�
13911
44
34
m
12 l
11
3
Spa
N
1028
4
45 13907
139 AVE.
n 9
5 N
�� 7
6 i�
4
F 13901
�3 46
F oREMgNDRIVE
ti a:1
Nam'
N
MO
N
c
c g 33$5 13875
o PEMp�OP\��
n
N
2 5
RIDGE DRIVE
40
41
42
43
44
m
N
m
m 1
VISTA
39
B
P 1
328
45
46
47
48
S1
�49 50 3863
VI-1m
m 38
P 1
6
328
1 36 37
10 9 713857
2
11 w
l
2
12 N � 813851
w
W
3
23 22 21
20
19
18
17
BCP
N16
33 13
N15 ro14 w�
24
25 N
N w
4
NN %
26 % 6113841
�3P 5 7 N�
ERT DR.
8 w 60 13837
GIL9
s 6 r
� ';� � r"'.+ � °a 5913833 v~i
6� 29s3 w w o 0 3^ EY 9 i F3 �� 58 7 5813829 N
55
30S> NN N o a m g o o m N Av 54
31 s ism 40 41 42 43 V4 45 46 47 d8 49 5G 51 52 53
32 38 9 lPfE
�?0 36 37
33 3 13819
BCP 33856
62
SK 6048
8
.00
1L
4
3
137 AVE.
13751
13719
13673/91
13920
13910
13738
13702
EP 28081.
A
I
I
SILVER':•1
Rem 1
City of Pitt _ �' L I
Meadows ;+ '
LOTS 34 - 38 & 44 - 56, BCP33856
j'�
y ' CORPORATION OF
� �1
! THE DISTRICT OF
N MAPLE RIDGE
District of 1,
Langley^�1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SCALE 1:2,500
DATE: Jun 29, 2009 FILE: SD/048/09 BY: PC
ERASER R
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
March 23, 2010
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Ernie Daykin, Mayor
Chairman
J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
Member
1. JEKNAVORIAN, ARMEN & CORRY
LEGAL:
LOCATION:
OWNER:
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS:
Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary
Lot 14, ection 19, Township 15, New Westminster
District, Plan BCP33184
12533 266 Street
Armen & Corry Jeknavorian
Release of Covenant BB130994
Covenant - Septic System Area
THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING
DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO ARMEN & CORRY JEKNAVORIAN.
CARRIED
_. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
ember
N
6� J
126 AVE.
0 12595
N �
38
::)
36 37
7
fi
BCP 11412
PARK
PARK
BCP 33184
14
12533 w
13
12503
12
12473
11
12453
5
6
7
8
8
10
4
BCP
33184
3
N
N
N
subject parcel
E 1/2
T he Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy
or present status of the information shown on
this map.
0
12533 - 266 Street
U)
CORPORATION OF
•. THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE
LICENSES, PERMITS & BYLAWS DEPT.
DATE: Mar 17, 2010 FILE: Untitled BY: CB
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
March 31, 2010
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Ernie Daykin, Mayor
Chairman
J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
Member
1. DP/069/06
LEGAL:
LOCATION:
OWNER:
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS:
Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary
Lots 1-32 inclusive, Section 28, Township 12, New
Westminster District, Plan BCP_
13396 233 Street & 13391 Balsam Street
Robert & Roslynn Poole
Covenant - Water Course Enhancement & Protection
-THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING
DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO DP/069/06.
CARRIED
J.�. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
141ember
P 2409 I P 2409
P 26077
29
13436
13425
13420
20
19
13411
13398
18
21
w
N 399fl
14
3369
15
636
1336711
27
P 23518L
3 1 4
SUBJECT PROPEIRTY
26
P 20636 I L M P
6
20
22
23
24
25
26
27 28
URN;
13387
13390
19
N
n�
29
5
8
13381
133 A AVE.
13375
N
13378
18
209
w
13371
g
y
17
30
ca 3363
13368
13361
m
480
10
1619353
m
43
42N
41
40
39
31
3
m
@C
1066
vgrs
13351
13352
PARK
11
15
3343
44
38
32
2348g
2
11332
"e
13342
1413333
13339
45
37
33 G
12
�s
2z m
9
13330
13
13323
�� 36
13327
@CP
3155
1
22 ��
234 P K
a 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
���
a
35
13315
133
District of �-
Pitt Meadows .,_..
Hans
�j
NDistrict
of
Langley
SCALE 1:2,500
5
LMP 46668
2
1
1JL2 Q3"
1
13379
7 3
4 13373
13309
13396 233 STREET 0r)i
N 13 3q I FSo�1SU m S'1-�eefi
CORPORATION OF
-- THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Sep 11, 2007 FILE: DP/069/06 BY: PC
RM;r-
10 Mar 10 09:50a Ashley Arthur 6044637619 p.2
March 10, 2010
Clerk's Department
District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9
Dear Sir or Madam:
1 am writing to formally request the opportunity to be a delegate at the April 13, 2010
City Council Meeting.
My name is Ashley Singh and I will be representing Volunteer Maple Ridge Pitt
Meadows as the Community Volunteer Developer. I will be discussing the Volunteer
Centre as well as announcing [stational Volunteer Week which is from April 13"' to the
24"' this year. 1 will not be using any multi -media devices.
Thank you so much,
Ashley Singh
Community Volunteer Developer
asingh(dcomservice.bc.ca
Volunteer Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows
11907 228th Street
Maple Ridge BC V2X 8U8
(604)467-6911 Ext.211
htip://www.coi-nservice.bc.ca/volunteer.hiin
702
4MAPLE RIDGE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: April 6, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/035/08
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6666-2009
11307 Maple Crescent, 11295 Maple Crescent
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone portions of the subject property from C-3 (Town Centre
Commercial) to M-3 (Special Industrial).
RECOMMENDATIONS:
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the
development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether
consultation is required with specifically:
a. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the
case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
b. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
c. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
d. First Nations;
e. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards, and
f. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this
matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the
District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and;
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6666-2009 be given First Reading.
DISCUSSION:
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Matthew Cheng (Architect)
Owner: 0706472 BC LTD
Legal Description: Lot 1, District Lots 278 and 279, Group 1, New
Westminster District, Plan 60497
OCP:
Lot 573, Listrict Lot 279, Group 1, New Westminster
District, Plan 114
Existing: Urban Residential
Proposed: Industrial
1101
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Access:
Servicing:
Site Area:
Companion Applications:
b) Project Description:
M-3 (Special Industrial),
C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
M-3 (Special Industrial)
Single Family Residential
C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Urban Residential
Vacant
C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Commercial
Single Family Residential
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Urban Residential
Railway Tracks, Vacant
RS-1(One Family Urban Residential)
Urban Residential
Outdoor storage, warehouse
Industrial strata warehouse
Maple Crescent
Full Urban
5068 m2 (1.25 ac)
DP/036/08, VP/035/08, SD/035/08
The applicant is proposing to rezone portions of the subject properties located at 11307 Maple
Crescent and 11295 Maple Crescent from C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) to M-3 (Business Park
Zone) to remove the split -zone and permit the construction of a new two -storey industrial strata
building on a new consolodated lot.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
This project requires an amendment to the Official Community Plan to re -designate the land use to
Industrial.
Zoning B law:
The current application proposes to rezone portions of the subject property to M-3 (Business Park
Zone) to permit the development a two storey industrial strata building. Any variations from the
requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.6 of the Official Community Plan, an Industrial Development Permit application
is required to ensure that the current proposal meets the needs of industry, through attractive design
that is compatible with adjacent development.
-2-
Advisory Design Panel:
A Industrial Development Permit is required and the application has been reviewed by the Advisory
Design Panel. The results of their review will be discussed in the Second Reading Report.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is required for this development and the applicant hosted a
Development Information Meeting on March 29, 2010 in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. The
results of this meeting will be discussed in the Second Reading Report.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
The development proposal has been circulated to various internal departments and external
agencies. Returned comments will be discussed in the Second Reading Report.
e) Development Applications:
Complete applications have been received for Rezoning, Official Community Plan Amendment,
Development Variance Permit, Development Permit and Subdivision for purposes of lot
consolidation. Details of these applications will be discussed in the Second Reading Report.
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community
Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early
posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the
public to comment. It is, therefore, recommended that Council not require any additional
consultation.
The development proposal is not in compliance with the Official Community Plan, however,
justification has been provided to support an Official Community Plan amendment. It is, therefore,
recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and
assessed priori Sec nd Reading.
Al1l) "
Prepared t., Jen iko
Plan ng lchnician
g'--AtMCIP
annin�,1
Approved by: F ank Quinn, MBA, RE
• PubliG-Mrks &2revelomlient Services
e
Concurrence: J. J. (Jim) Rul
Chef Administrative Officer
The following apOendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6666-2009
-3-
se 3 s' N n P210
583 e� 2 N 651 648 647
12
Pd. Q 2
P 8878A
�o l NN a 415
��o r� 582 r
DSO
-7
11414
650
649
646
645
642
P 2180
11406
v 581 3 11405
1
11395 *PP044
C 6
0 A p 8
135g 0. 11� 1 7 r�
9
11386
�
N
m
v
N
667
668
671
672
675
ti y6
�
, ,�•s g
1
�
N
a
9Z9oZ
577
ti3`�
666
669
670
6730
674
3
h60
�2a
10
P
8
a
,o576
575
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
56$��
s,
574
ti���2569
1.0
742
743
P
180
N
Qrr�
573
11314
741
738
737
c QS
r A
�
p,�
RP 84831
Q �9�
160
A,o Pd. A
739
736
�•L
p
ps0 `�0
1 11302
A0
IQ,R8111
N
SCALE 1:2,500
City of Pitt
f District of
Langley
745 g
a
1224N
748
E 48
7 8
Appendix A
IF 114
641 638 637 634 633
N N
114 AVE.
Pd. B
PARK
P 55931
LORNE AVE
N
P
2180
1'726
734
733
730
729
LMS 629
728
727
A
LIMP 1857
*PP044
LMS
N
11289
1419
o
A N
P
180
LIMP 12217
751
754
755
125
P
54
11271
749
752
753
756
1
N
N
I
N
m
N
� I
686 N c`
725 N72.
Pt
11312
724 1 721
758 75�
1042 E
11266
LIMP 469 *PP044
Rem 2 PCI A 88024 1240
cy � g 795
Co�9a9tiA soy U N a 112 74209
9� d N o= 1
o Rem
�4r N 797
Y
00
00
a 19P 6
4r79
1186
,o
11295/11307 MAPLE CRESCENT
ICn
11Z F
CORPORATION OF
'" THE DISTRICT OF
PLE RIDGE
MAPLE RIDGE
I, �
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
' DATE: Apr 6, 2010 FILE: RZ/035/08 BY: PC
Appendix B
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO.6666-2009
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6666-2009."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 District Lots 278 and 279 Group 1 Plan 60497 New Westminster District.
AND
Lot 573, Listrict Lot 279, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan 114
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1455 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to M-3 (Special Industrial)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20.
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20.
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the
PRESIDING MEMBER
day of
,A.D.20.
CORPORATE OFFICER
3 9
a 577 32
1+ 10
i�,bb`l �, 7 6 131
1
575
1 }�� 57 4" i
573
N
0
N
666
669
670
673
674
P
218
n
h
h
h
h
N
N
N
N
N
P 55931
0,678 ha,
*PP044 LORNE AVE.
742 h h h h h h h h
� ro
P 2180 P 218 0
143 741 738 737 734 733 730 729 �726
RP 84831
Pcl, A 739 736 LM A 629 728 727
1 .7 Q 1191 LMP 1857 o p
sr
>>o
A
60 RW 72041 *PP044
17 Rem v _� LMS 'h 17289
�92 745 1 419
gay 1122a A P 2180
A
746 LMP 1221 751 754 755
21
of P 8654 17271
y� 748 749 752 753 756
1
�
w
v
N �
^J
u
91
�N
LMP 469 *PP044
q.\Rem 2,% Pcl A -P 88 2
amply •o > RfLn mg
0-1 0
r� a� �,9> s 7990 opQo N
[If
�qy W 71 9 7
Rp
6,�
RW 5221
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No. 6666-2009
Map No. 1455
From: C-3(Town Centre Commercial)
To: M-3(Special Industrial)
1 :2000
4
RIDGEMAPLE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: April 1, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/071/09
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6719 - 2010
12161237 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from A-1 (Small Holding Agricultural)
to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)).
RECOMMENDATIONS:
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the
development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether
consultation is required with specifically:
a. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the
case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
b. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
c. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
d. First Nations;
e. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and
f. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this
matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the
District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and;
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6719 - 2010 be given First Reading.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Jim Pattison Developments Ltd
Owner: Jim Pattison Industries Ltd
Legal Description: Lot 1, Section 21, Township 12, NWD Plan LMP9544
OCP:
Existing: Agricultural
Proposed: Urban Residential
Zoning:
Existing: A-1 (Small Holding Agricultural)
Proposed: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
1102
Surrounding Uses
North: Use:
Zone:
Designation
South: Use:
Zone:
Designation
East: Use:
Zone:
Single Family Residential in ALR
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Agricultural, ALR
Multi -Family Residential
RM-1(Townhouse Residential)
Urban Residential
Single Family Residential and Park in ALR
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-1b
(One Family
Urban Residential- Medium Density)
Designation: Agricultural and Urban Residential
West: Use: Single Family Residential in ALR
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Agricultural, ALR
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
b) Site Characteristics:
Vacant
Townhouse
3.796 Hectares (9.379 acres)
2371h Street
Full Urban through Rezoning Servicing Agreement
The subject site consists of a 9.37 acre lot, west of 237th Street on the northern side of Dewdney
Trunk Road. Historically used for agricultural purposes, the subject site is currently vacant, relatively
flat with a localized topographic mound near the south property line. The existing site naturally drains
to the northwest corner and is within a catchment draining to tributaries leading to the Coho Creek.
The property slopes westward gradually dropping in elevation from 2371h Street to the west
boundary.
c) Project Description:
The proposed development is for 105 townhouses (two storey structures) in duplex and fourplex
forms with two main access points from 237 Street. Pedestrian connectivity is achieved via
sidewalks and trails throughout the site. A 10-phase development of 105 townhouse units in six
different designs has been proposed. A 15 m buffer zone abutting the agricultural land to the north
and a 30 m buffer zone with a stormwater bio-filtration pond on the western side, abutting the ALR
land to the west are proposed to reduce the impact of this proposal on ALR lands.
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
This project requires an amendment to the Official Community Plan to re -designate the land use to
Urban Residential, to amend the Urban Boundary to include this site, and to remove the `starred
property' designation from the site. This site was one of the starred properties identified on the
2006 Official Community Plan and it was recently removed from the Green Zone by the Greater
Vancouver Regional District.
yIM
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the development site to RM-1(Townhouse Residential) to
permit a 105 unit townhouse development. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed
zone will require a Development Variance Permit application.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan, a Multi -Family Development Permit
application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with
compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with
neighbouring land uses.
Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development
Permit application is required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement
of watercourse and riparian areas.
Advisory Design Panel:
A Multi -Family Development Permit is required and the application has been reviewed by the
Advisory Design Panel. The results of their review will be discussed in the Second Reading Report.
Development Information_Meetin :
A Development Information Meeting is required for this development and the applicant hosted a
Development Information Meeting on March 9, 2010 in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. The
results of this meeting will be discussed in the Second Reading Report.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, is being sought
from the various.internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a) Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
c) Environment Department;
d) Fire Department;
e) Parks Department;
f) School District;
g) Ministry of Transportation.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
An evaluation of servicing requirements by the Engineering Department will be provided in the
Second Reading Report.
f) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, or has already
been provided, as required by Development Procedural Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended:
-3-
1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A);
2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B or Schedule C);
3. Multi -Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D);
4. Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F);
The above list is intended to be indicative only and other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is not in compliance with the Official Community Plan, however,
justification has been provided to support an Official Community Plan amendment. It is, therefore,
recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and
assessed prior to Second Reading.
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community
Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early
posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the
public to comment. It is, therefore, recommended that Council not require any additional
consultation.
Pre red by- Ann E wards, CPT
Senior Pk mnir g Technician
one Pic ling, MCIP
Direclo _ anning
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Devellownent Services
Concurrence: J. orn) Ru6d,
C ief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6719 - 2010
-4-
SK 2613
12301
12215
APPENDIX A
Rem 1
12250
12176 P 72342
2
1 +2+as
SUBJECT PRQPERTY 12161
P 1023
N
LMP 9544
2102
.4
415
2 12o B AVE.
12099
o J��
NS N6 `2 7
2
1 LMP
LMS 988
LMP 9544
Rem Pd. 2 of Pd. A
BCP 8847
— EP 1734
City of Pitt
Meadows
12161 237 STREET
I
CORPORATION OF
J -
T
-A-CZ- THE DISTRICT OF
N
District of '
I L'
o
i ,
MAPLE RIDGE
Langley `
`:�
�"X
` PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Oct27, 2009 FILE: RZ/071/09 BY: PC
SCALE 1:2,500
1 ~ -."• —
'Y��
�FR
R.
APPENDIX B
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6719 - 2010
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6719 - 2010."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 Section 21 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan LMP9544
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1471 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RM-1(Townhouse Residential)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 .
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of
PRESIDING MEMBER
,A.D. 20 .
CORPORATE OFFICER
3.885 ha.
12301
SK 2613
1.416 ha.
12215
72176
P 72342
2
1.122 ha.
1
72146
3.796 ha
72161
1
1.336 ha.
P 1023
N
00
a
LMP 9544
12102
4
0.537 ha.
,a
2
v
14
5.961 ha.
\
120BT e
II
N
LM N
1 �y�
170T3
I I
II L1
2
120 6 AVE.
3.156 ha
/2099
h
ri3 N4 ti5 N6 N7
���-_------�
1hN2
9�5
III
J
LMP
3
LMS 988
LMP 9545
))
LMP 9544
LMP 9546
— v
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No. 6719-2010
Map No. 1471
From: A-1 (Small Holding Agricultural)
To: RM-1 (Townhouse* Residential)
L 1:2500
RIDGEMAPLE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SU BJ ECT:
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: April 1, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/072/09
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6732-2010
10175, 10121 and 10141240 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential).
RECOMMENDATIONS:
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the
development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether
consultation is required with specifically:
a. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the
case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
b. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
c. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
d. First Nations;
e. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards, and
f. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this
matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the
District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and;
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6732-2010 be given First Reading.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Robert Ciccozzi Architecture Inc. (Shannon Seefeldt)
Owner: Donray Construction Ltd and JME Developments Ltd,
RAJA Holdings Ltd,
Randhawa Development Ltd, and Gurdip Singh Bath
Legal Descriptions: Parcel "G" (Ref. Plan 2701), DL 405, GP 1, NWD;
SE 198' x 660' (Plan with fee deposited No. 14240F), DL 405, GP 1, having a
frontage of 198' on Baker Rd. by a uniform depth of 660' and adjoining
Parcel "G" (Reference Plan 2701), NWD; and
1103
INS
Existing:
Proposed:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Parcel "H" (Plan with fee deposited 22319F) of Parcel "One" (Plan with fee
deposited 14153F), DL 405, GP 1, NWD.
Agricultural
Urban Residential, Conservation
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential)
RM-1(Townhouse Residential)
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access: 240 Street
Servicing:
b) Site Characteristics:
Single Family Residential
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), RS-3 (One
Family Rural Residential)
Agricultural, ALR
Albion Elementary School
P-1 (Park and School)
Institutional
Single Family Residential
R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), RS-2
(One Family Suburban Residential)
Medium Density Residential, Conservation
Vacant
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Agricultural, ALR
1 lot - single family residential, 2 lots - vacant
Townhouse
3.6 ha (9 acres)
Full Urban
The site is located on the west side of 240 Street, just north of the Albion Elementary School
property. The site is relatively flat and is currently undeveloped except for one dwelling located on
the center property. A portion of the west end of the site contains wetland areas and is located
within the Fraser River floodplain. The site is bordered by agricultural lands to the north and west,
the school to the south and 240 Street on the east is a major arterial route.
c) Project Description:
The applicant is requesting to, rezone the development site from RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit the
construction of 164 townhouse dwellings. A portion of the site to the west of the townhouses will be
protected as environmentally sensitive areas.
-2-
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
This project requires an amendment to the Official Community Plan to re -designate the land use to
Urban Residential and Conservation, to amend the Urban Boundary to include this site, and to
remove the `starred property' designation from the site. This site was one of the starred properties
identified on the 2006 Official Community Plan and it was recently removed from the Green Zone by
the Greater Vancouver Regional District.
Zonin Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the development site to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to
permit a 164 unit townhouse development. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed
zone will require a Development Variance Permit application.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan, a Multi -Family Development Permit
application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with
compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with
neighbouring land uses.
Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development
Permit application is required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement
of watercourse and riparian areas.
Advisory Desi n Panel:
A Multi -Family Development Permit is required and the application has been reviewed by the
Advisory Design Panel. The results of their review will be discussed in the Second Reading Report.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is required for this development and the applicant hosted a
Development Information Meeting on January 12, 2010 in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. The
results of this meeting will be discussed in the Second Reading Report.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, is being sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a)
Engineering Department;
b)
Operations Department;
c)
Environment Department;
d)
Fire Department;
e)
Parks Department;
f)
School District;
g)
Ministry of Transportation.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
Wc3
An evaluation of servicing requirements by the Engineering Department will be provided in the
Second Reading Report.
f) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, or has already
been provided, as required by Development Procedural Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended:
1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A);
2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C);
3. Multi -Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D);
4. Development Variance Permit (Schedule E);
5. Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F);
The above list is intended to be indicative only and other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is not in compliance with the Official Community Plan, however,
justification has been provided to support an Official Community Plan amendment. It is, therefore,
recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and
assessed prior to Second Reading.
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community
Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early
posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the
public to comment. It is, therefore, recommended that Council not require any additional
consultation.
PrepA(red by. Ann Edwards, CPT
Senior Planning Technician
kpprove a ckering, P, MCIP
red anning
Approved ., Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
M: Public orks & e pment Services
r
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6732-201
-4-
S 5.25 CHAINS OF J
r_1=001•1►:�_�
City of Pitt ,
Meadows-
......
- q.
N District of fi
4
Langley
SCALE 1:2,500
54 1 I
10117
53
58 I 10087
59
10l
1 60
i
I
HILL AVE.
10026
710024
198
N0074
1002210016N
9
<
18
f0006
10016
10
17
10000
100 AVE
t0006
16
.n I 12 } ,1g 4 ry15
i C 10121/41/75 240 STREET
i°
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
t MAPLE
�� RIDGE
i . �
-�- - PLANNING DEPARTMENT
j
DATE: Nov 3, 2009 FILE: RZ/072/09 BY: PC
Appendix B
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6732 - 2010
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6732 - 2010."
2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Parcel "H" (Plan with fee deposited 22319F) of Parcel "One" (Plan with fee deposited
14153F) District Lot 405 Group 1 New Westminster District
South East 198 Feet by 660 Feet (Plan with fee deposited No. 14240F)
District Lot 405 Group 1 Having a Frontage of 198 Feet on Baker Road by a uniform
depth of 660 Feet and adjoining Parcel "G" (Reference Plan 2701) New Westminster
District
Parcel "G" (Reference Plan 2701) District Lot 405 Group 1 New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1479 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-1(Townhouse Residential)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20.
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20.
APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20.
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
102T3
v
4
r
U
REM. 1
G
P 7595 RP 2701
1.214 ho
4.059 ho 10ri5
S E 198' ADJ Pd. G
RP 2701
1.214 ho
10141
H
P 22319F
1.214 ho
0.676 ho 0.737 ha
LOT 22 In TP
RP 64270
P 2158
Ln
21 N
Rem Rem 6 P 57737
2.427 ho 100.37
RLW 88202 — —
P 3851,
Rem Pd. L 1001
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No. 6732-2010
Map No. 1479
From: RS-2(One Family Suburban Residential)
and RS-3(One Family Rural Residential)
To: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
- -1 -1 y
102 A AVE.
N 75'
of 4
II
�oz2z
a
6
25242
I UP
8
21
rna 4
_
P
924 I�
LMP 480
7
cC
a5
I�
1�
102 AVE
P 39666
a
o
36
o
7Q198
8
ry
A
11
7
10174
526
(P 19526)
P 1
6
10160
PARK HCP 209/0
}a 2
1 &
1017o
' 74 8
15
18
1
10147
[l!O
olse
147
N
19 U
972
6—
ro13'
Q
10736m
101
o> o
r 13
0
O 1
012s
r412
BC P 34
'0120 �
55
54
U 1i1
C,
1011e
10
o17s
16
cu
10106
53
101
a-
56
wA
01082
9
m
L5 P
0102
1010
10096
66
1 58
1
r00B
S 7
L,67
10090
1
2 N
1Q09
10074
5
r0073
s5
cO67T
70066 r9r
0064
65
1 6
4 LP 1
1p0?1
Q54
E'J6
M
1005
62
HILL AVE.
>y
10026
7
ry
�
' 2
20
rooz4
7
73
cO
18
74
75
A
n
1002?
(1Q16 r
,,
❑
�O
<
18
10008
J ry
J
-
70016
1 OrL
17
rO00O J
100 AVE.
10006
'A
1:2500
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 24, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/017/10
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6728-2010
12472 Laity Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-1a (One Family Amenity
Residential) to R-1 (Residential District). To proceed further with this application additional
information is required as outlined below.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6728-2010 be given First Reading, and;
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule (A - H) of the Development
Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Nick & John Faber of Jent Construction Ltd
Owner: Lisa J Faber
Legal Description: Lot: 1, D.L.: 248, Plan: 69491; PID: 001-648-420
OCP:
Existing: Single -Family Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1a (One Family Amenity Residential)
Proposed: R-1(Residential District)
Surrounding Uses
North: Use:
Single Family Residential
Zone:
RS-1a (One Family Amenity Residential)
Designation:
Urban Residential & Conservation
South: Use:
Single Family Residential
Zone:
RS-1a (One Family Amenity Residential)
Designation:
Urban Residential
East: Use:
Single Family Residential
Zone:
RS-1a (One Family Amenity Residential)
Designation:
Urban Residential
1104
West: Use: Laity Street & Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1(One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing requirement:
b) Site & Project Description:
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
786 M2
Laity Street
Full Urban
The subject site consists of one legal lot located at 12472 Laity Street within the west Maple Ridge
urban area. The subject site is fairly flat and main access is from Laity Street on the west. The
proposal is to permit a future subdivision of the subject site into two parcels zoned R-1 (Residential
District).
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need
to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require
application for further development permits.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The Official Community Plan states that stabilizing, preserving and enhancing the character of
neighbourhoods are key elements in fostering a sense of community and that it is important to
encourage infill development that is sensitive to the existing residential and neighbourhood context.
The subject site is designated "Major Corridor Residential" within the urban residential designation
of the Official Community Plan. The objective of this designation is to manage residential growth
through infill and intensification in a manner that respects neighbourhoods and the existing physical
character of the surrounding areas.
The Major Corridor Residential designation is characterized by the following:
a) is not within the Town Centre Area or a neighbourhood with an Area Plan;
b) has frontage on an existing Major Road Corridor as identified on figure 4 of the Official Community
Plan or has frontage on a road built in whole or part to a collector, arterial, TransLink Major road or
Provincial Highway standard;
c) may be adjacent to Community Commercial Node or designated commercial Centre. This proposal
complies with a) and b) above as it lies outside the Town Centre Area and outside a neighbourhood
with an Area Plan and has frontage on Laity Street which is identified as a Major Road Corridor on
figure 4 of the Official Community Plan.
-2-
The Major Corridor Residential designation supports a variety of ground oriented housing forms such
as single detached dwellings, garden suites, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhouses, apartments
or small lot intensive residential, subject to compliance with the Major Corridor Infill policies.
Policy 3-21 the Official Community Plan states that "All Neighbourhood and Major Corridor
Residential infill developments will respect and reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of
established neighbourhoods, with particular attention to:
a) the ability of the existing infrastructure to support the new development,
b) the compatibility of the site design, setbacks, and lot configuration with the existing pattern of
development in the area;
c) the compatibility between building massing and the type of dwelling units in the proposed
development and the surrounding residential properties;
d) the location, orientation, and visual impact of vehicle access/egress in relation to: i. adjacent
developments, ii. the street, iii. the pedestrian environment,
e) minimizing adverse parking and traffic impacts on the existing neighbourhood;
f) a gradual transition of scale and density through the design of building mass and form".
The proposal is in compliance with this policy. The neighbourhood surrounding the subject site
predominantly consists of single family dwellings; hence the proposed single family use will be
compatible with the infill policies.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 12472 Laity Street from RS-1a
(One Family Amenity Residential) to R-1(Residential District) to permit a future two lot subdivision.
The proposed R-1 (Residential District) requires a minimum lot area of 371 m2; a minimum lot width
of 12 meters and a minimum lot depth of 24 meters. The maximum lot coverage permitted in this
zone is 40% of the net lot area and maximum height of the single family units permitted is 9.0
meters. The minimum setbacks for the single family units permitted in this zone are: Front yard
setback at 5.5 meters, Rear yard setback at 8 meters; Exterior side yard setback at 3.0 meters and
Interior side yard setback at 1.2 meters. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone
will require a Development Variance Permit application.
Both the proposed lots meet the minimum lot area required by the zone. However, the proposal
requires a variance for the lot width proposed for Lot A. Minimum lot width required for the proposed
zone is 12 meters while the proposed lot width for Lot A is 11.20 meters (Appendix C). A more
detailed evaluation will take place between first and second reading once the additional information
required is submitted by the applicant.
Development Permits:
This proposal is not subject to a Development Permit approval.
Advisory Design Panel:
This application does not require a Commercial, Industrial or Multi -Family Development Permit and
hence does not have to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to Second Reading.
Development Information Meetin
A Development Information Meeting is not required for this application as per Council Policy 6.20.
W2
Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a)
Engineering Department;
b)
Operations Department;
c)
Fire Department;
d)
Building Department;
e)
School District;
f)
Utility companies;
g)
Agricultural Land Commission.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. Any deficiencies in off -
site services will be evaluated between first and second reading once the additional information
required is submitted by the applicant and covered through a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a
condition of final reading.
d) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed, the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedural Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended:
1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A);
2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B or Schedule C);
3. Development Variance Permit (Schedule E);
4. Subdivision Application, as per attached requirements.
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, therefore, it is
recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided
and assessed prior to Second Reading.
The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations
governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must
be approved by the District of Maple Ridge's Approving Officer.
-4-
Prepared by- Rasika Achary , B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED@ AP
Planner .
Approved ie era , CP, MCIP
Director of PI in
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Deueftment Services
Concurrence: J. I/(Jim) Rule
Ch of Administrative Officer
RA/d p
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6728-2010
Appendix C - Preliminary Subdivision Plan
-5-
12550 Appendix A
4 �
12540 M
N N
5 �
12530 12528 * P P 115
P 29363
6
0
6
12520
UJ 12
M 173
N
7
UJ
�
12510
00 P 81769
8
a
174
12500
12501
12494
m
r`
12490
11
175
9
12495
P 81769
12480
215
10
12485
12467
2
12474rty
Subject Prope
P 69491
214
12477
1
258 257
P 5 039
256
12472
P 511T0 210
212 213
255 254 253
208 209
211
N
N N
r
M
N N N 12461
207
M M
co N C� M
M
M M M
_
N CV
_
N N N N
_ _
CN N N
Douglas Ave
12411
12410
295
N
305 CO 306
0
Cd
o P 511 0 a o
CT
M� LO
M
N
N
M C)
CY)
0^
12404
N
N N
N 205 204 CO
00 N N N
Rem 201 20
29607 ii
307
304
206
1
Z
12403
w
12401 U)
297 o
P 1180
P 5118
191
192 193 194
195 196 197
12395
co
0
298
322 ro
�'
0) Lo o r N �*
N M M M M
N
CV
N
N N N N N N
12387
9
12386
303 12397
2377
12383
N
N
00
C0 'IT
o M M
0
_
City of Pitt
Meadows
I C:
12472-Laity
St
O
o
*
CORPORATION OF
!w
THE DISTRICT OF
N
District of !
j
MAPLE RIDGE
Langley
j
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Mar 8, 2010 RZ/017/10 BY: JV
SCALE 1:1,500
��
.41
Appendix B
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6728 - 2010
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6728 - 2010."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 District Lot 248 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 69491
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1477 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1(Residential District)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200.
PUBLIC HEARING held the . day of
READ a second time the day of
READ a third time the day of
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the
PRESIDING MEMBER
, A.D. 200.
, A.D. 200.
day of , A.D. 200.
CORPORATE OFFICER
P 6039
263 262 261 260 259 258 257
ry ry M ry ry ry ry
12505
P 29363
6
1.012 ha.
EP
60007 7467
EP 5705739P 62356255 572467 N
5
264
72477
295
1305
1243s
N 294
306
12407
o 265
293
296
a
12404
307
72404
304
'n 12405
12401
Z
o
12403
1 266
292
297
12399
72398
a
12395
O
267
291
298
322 �
12392
12391N
268
12385
1297
269
30812379
&12
12375
270
309
2377
12367
.0
310
271
12365282
12355
29
311
12600
`v 4
�, 369 ti 361 36 ry
6 N Y 12'5
PP117
725,90
a 126 AVE.
EP 82643
a 6q�
7 o rn 3
12MO
N
369-
368
2
ry
ry ry
ry
ry
12570
371 370
P 6
438
367
3
2
12560
13
P 4
354
EP
47
3
172 171
170 169
1
12550
4
P 81769
12540
00
ry
ry ry
ry
ry
ry
5
0_
12530
12528
*PP115 EXETER AVE.
72524
EP 81771
EP
6
rn
a
72520
12
173
CO
ry
714�7
72570
P 81769 a
148
8
w
if)1 74
P 4 3
12500
> 1250
7 44
176
72490
1 1
a 175
12496
9
f249
N
P 81769
1248
2215
0
177
10
12485
12484
Ln
4
2
RW 51181
178
P 69491
214
Ln
72478
o
7z47
71
12472
P
5 180
210
212
213
a
179 0_
208
209
211
0
12466
"�
*
207
�
180
ry ry
`�
ry
ry
ry
ryj
12460
DOUGLAS AVE.
c�
181
ry
ry P
5 180 ^
M
00
h
ry
ry
ry
ry
ti h
.,
'113,
206
205
204
Ln
1a
LI) Rem
201
200 o 199
RW
51181
a
A
51180
w
P
5118C
P 51180
P
37851
191
192
193
194
195 196
_ 197
198
N
97
m 98
ry
ry
Po
ti
ry
ry
ry
ry
ry
ry
124 AVE.
ry1
t ry
C ry
B
ry 19
n 00
1- N
r
LMP
11193
P 23730
ry
A
9
1'
a
2
723
N
P 7478
0.405 ha
�_ 1 8
V)
20
12375
2366
0
0_
$
2356
72370 N
I
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No. 6728-2010
Map No. 1477
From: RS-1 a(One Family Amenity Residential)
To: R-1 (Residential District)
1;2500
Appendix C
0
co
N
CL
�' tio�ti oa'r� a
v-
N "t x
Z
Q-
"z.
a2 X
oz, a.sa
-le X
oI"2 X I
I
,4
^
E -.
z N
x lg I I ,!�G�
� I
ac' x X ^I 1� 1 I 12.27
m
2 X
�z x
U ZI 4 oZ"t !
X
(kZfZ6 PUU SLSS UDId)
J
a,
133alS ,urtI
o�
z�
o�
o °-
ca
0 0
� 3
�,
�
Ay 2
4
Q
o
o Z-d
o �'
N
O
-ld o I
t
3
F
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE: March 30, 2010
FILE NO: RZ/018/10
ATTN: C of W
First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6734-2010
12580 243 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the above noted subject property from RS-3 (One Family
Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). To proceed further with this
application additional information is required as outlined below.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6734-2010 be given First Reading; and;
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule B of the Development
Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant / Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Existing:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses
North: Use:
Zone:
Designation
South: Use:
Zone:
Designation
East: Use:
Zone:
Designation
Robert V. & Janice C. Rusbourne
Lot 82 Section 22 Township 12 NWD Plan 43885
Estate Suburban Residential
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Single Family Residential
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Estate Suburban Residential
Single Family Residential
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Estate Suburban Residential
Single Family Residential
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Estate Suburban Residential
1105
West: Use:
Zone:
Designation
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property
Site Area:
b) Project Description:
Single Family Residential
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Estate Suburban Residential
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
0.812 HA (2.0 acres)
The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit a two (2) lot single family subdivision.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need
to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require
application for further development permits.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The subject property is designated Estate Suburban Residential and the proposed RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) zoning complies with this land use designation.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit a two (2) lot single family
subdivision.
Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance
Permit application.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input will be sought
from the various internal departments:
a)
Engineering Department;
b)
Operations Department;
c)
Fire Department;
d)
Parks Department;
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading.
-2-
The District's Subdivision Approving Officer has not assessed a subdivision plan for this site. This will
take place once a subdivision application is received with all supporting documentation.
e) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedural Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended:
1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B);
2. Subdivision Application.
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CdiP►Ld1t1wel40
The proposed RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone is in compliance with the Estate
Suburban Residential designation of the Official Community Plan. It is recommended that Council
grant First Reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No.6734-2010 subject to additional information being
provided and assessed prior to Second Reading.
The proposed subdivision layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and
regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary
and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge's Approving Officer.
Prepared by. Patrick Ward
Planrt4ig Technician
Approv atck CP, MCIP
irec or ofplanning
X?—
Approved br, Frank Quinn, MBA, P.En
GM: Public Works eve pment Services
Concurrence: �. L. (Jim) Buie
/Chief Administrative Officer
PW/dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6734-2010
WO
J
CP
LMS 3755
755
7
6 P 43a�
66
12581
PART LYING EAST OF ALOUETTE RIVER
AND NORTH OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
67
0
N
65
i522 P 86522 � n
m
co 12561 N
K
2
LIMP 123
1 Rem 64
12525
N N N
68
N
126 AVE.
Appendix A
_ P 4388`.
P 3�Q1 71
0
N
� 7
F
N
12665 w 12640
Vl
Z
a
P 43885 2 P 72087
69 M 12621
126 AVE.
125 AVE.
N
w
12610
12570
12550
12530
12490
12460
12440
Appendix B
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6734 - 2010
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6734 - 2010."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 82 Section 22 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 43885
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1481 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200.
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200.
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200.
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
CID
N P
LMS 3755
00
C
N
1
a
0.406 ha.
17665
375
67 h P 43885 a 2 P 72087
° 68 'i 69 a o.ao5 no. 12621
6 P 43 h h
126 AVE.
66 12581LO
7
65
� N
6522 IP 86522 00
N!f 17561 N
I
co� i1
2
J� LMP 123
1 ha. 1 0.411 ha. 1 Rem 64
1 0.406 ha. 0.406 ha.
N 1 h ry 12525
125 AVE. 125 AVE.
pl h
y a ry N h 12497
N
1
w P 43885 r" 0.407 ha.
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No. 6734-2010
Map No. 1481
From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
To: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
1:2500
°
O^
1
h
2
h
00
0.405 ha.
0.406
ha.
82
co
v
0.872 no.
0_
P 7 685
12seo
12555
P 43885
83
80
0.812 ha.
0.812 ha.
12ssz
EPP 1414
=0A
1
2
0.406 ha.b�
0.404 ha.T
h h
MAPLE RIDGE
Deep Hoots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE: March 30, 2010
FILE NO: RZ/021/10
ATTN: C of W
First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6735-2010
9990 240 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) and CS-1 (Service Commercial) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). To proceed further
with this application additional information is required as outlined below.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the
development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether
consultation is required with specifically:
i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the
case of a Municipal Official Community plan;
ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iii. First Nations;
v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards, and
iv. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this
matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the
District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment;
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6735-2010 be given First Reading; and;
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule A, C, D and F of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Jean Fares
Owner: Mohinder Singh
Jaswinder Singh Dar
Legal Description: Lot 4 District Lot 407 Group 1 NWD Plan 25341
1106
OCP:
Zoning:
Existing: Medium Density Residential, Conservation
Existing: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), CS-1 (Service
Commercial)
Proposed: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
Surrounding Uses
North: Use:
Single Family Residential
Zone:
RS-1(One Family Urban Residential), R-3 (Special
Amenity Residential District)
Designation
Medium Density Residential
South: Use:
Commercial
Zone:
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), CS-1
(Service Commercial)
Designation:
Medium Density Residential
East: Use:
Vacant lands adjacent to Albion Brook
Zone:
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), RS-3 (One
Family Rural Residential)
Designation:
Conservation
West: Use:
Commercial, Single Family Residential
Zone:
CS-1 (Service Commercial), RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential)
Designation:
Commercial, Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
b) Project Description:
Single Family Residential
Townhouse Residential
0.32 HA (0.79 acre)
The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
and CS-1 (Service Commercial) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit a townhouse
development.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need
to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require
application for further development permits.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
Albion Area Plan
The subject property is designated Medium Density Residential and the proposed RM-1(Townhouse
Residential) zoning complies with this land use designation. An Official Community Plan amendment
application for a conservation boundary adjustment may be required.
WA
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) and CS-1 (Service Commercial) to RM-1(Townhouse Residential) to permit a townhouse
development.
Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance
Permit application.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan, a Multi -Family Development Permit
application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with
compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with
neighbouring land uses.
Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development
Permit application is also required as the subject site is located within 50 metres of the top of
bank of a watercourse (Albion Brook). The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development
Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and
riparian areas.
Advisory Design Panel:
A Multi -Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel
prior to Second Reading.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a)
Engineering Department;
b)
Operations Department;
c)
Environment Department;
d)
Fire Department;
e)
Parks Department;
f)
School District.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading.
e) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedural Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended:
1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A);
-3-
2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C);
3. Multi -Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D);
4. Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F);
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, therefore, it is
recommended that Council grant First Reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6735-
2010 subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. It
is expected that once complete information is received, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6735-2010 will
be amended and an Official Community Plan amendment application for a conservation boundary
adjustment may be required.
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community
Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early
posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the
public to comment. It is, therefore, recommended that Council not require any additional
consultation.
Prepared by- Patrick Ward
Planning Technician
, MCIP
ing
Approved bpi: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GAC�ublic Works & el pment Services
Concurrence: J. (Jim) RA
Ckiief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6735-2010
-4-
10031
I UUb4 � a-bu
4n 10065
10056 2
5 J 70 71
1002s to
6 10059
HILLAVE.
Appendix A
50- 61 i
� 62 27
26
10026 o N o 1
7 � � D
O 10024 � 72 73LO n 19
ODD 8 74 75 � 10022
't 10016 LO n- a 18
CL 9 C o o 2 o
P 38144 _j 10008 � J N N J N 10016
15 10 IZ 17
10017 10000 100 AVE. 10006
11
N m
16
9992 a O 9996
12L13 14
� P 2772 �It 487 5
13 14
9990
9999 P 25341
27081 4 — -
P 11108 Rem 5
REM A Rem 6
0
m CON coO co
� O
N �
� N
r39 F ,y9
City of Pitt —__ i
Meadows j
NDistrict of
Langley
SCALE 1:1,500
O
U)
`0 25
24
23
22 _26
Subject Property
P 25341
00
O
d'
N
P 48367 1 }
9990-240 St
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
. , MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I¢�
1 DATE: Mar 22, 2010 RZ/021/10 BY: PC
Appendix B
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6735 - 2010
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6735 - 2010."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 4 District Lot 407 New Westminster District Plan 25341
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1482 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 .
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 .
APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 .
PRESIDING MEMBER
CORPORATE OFFICER
-
22319F
lau7r�t53P
V Vh
OM Rry1
4
70715
1o0!7o7
1.
48
113CP1 41
4-757
49ry
64
50ry
111 10110
28
1.214 ha
70 7�
a L 368
°�V
364
LOT 22
fofozl
1N a
5 44
10121
10096
.55
66 58 v 100
h N N ry ry ry
RP 64270
7D0g�
f0090 foal 542
n10074
q,,67
59 y8
ti
00
65 7 1Q0lovT23
53
10066 �� 64 1
21
foo64 n
g6 9& �p6p54 Lp10066
3 h3
29
10056
6 a,1
61
70� 71
2 L
P 57737
!ooze
1Q0562
2
1003f
6
ry J005
4a�, 2
2.427 ha
Q
2
HILL AVE,
cv2 5
10027
.v 1
ao129
Ln 10024
� Ln
773 '0 �n
RLW
u�
7>0022
—802
—
900
¢----- 1816 00
P 38514
10006
fool7c>
Pd. L f
fool
) 7pppp
100 AVE. 10006-
0 11�
16
32851 F
N 39sz
`a o 9996P
A
27 24
12
1 14ry PARK
42 ha 13
14
9990
0.603 ha
p 253 P 25341
9999
¢
f *LMP 27081
P 11108
Rem 5
Rem 1
ti LIMP 30265
REM A
Rem
P 23833
o a
LOUGHEED HWy.
,BCP
v a N
`�
7835 LMP
RW 71204
2$0,55
RW 71204
I
8
7324
A
p0
s73
RA
s9�
48 3
Og
ho
RW 71204 -MP 385
n
C
Rem 3
9890 2 P 6254
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No. 6735-2010
Map No. 1482
From: RS-2 One Family Suburban Residential)
CS-1 Service Commercial)
To: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
LMP 2
ti� p
A�� � ti 4692
� A
P 48367
v'
Rem 8 '
co A
W11 Cli
i
R
s s,
1:2500
F
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 31, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/022/10
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6733 - 2010
11523 236 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). To proceed further with this application additional
information is required as outlined below.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
In respect of Section 879 of the Local GovemmentAct consultation during OCP amendment, Council
must consider whether consultation is required with specifically:
i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the
case of a Municipal Official Community plan;
ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iii. First Nations;
v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards, and
iv. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this
matter beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together
with an invitation to the public to comment;
That Zone Amending Bylaw No.6733-2010 be given First Reading; and;
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C, D, F, and G of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Gurinder Grewal
Owner: Jagdip Johal
Legal Description: Lot 7 Section 16 Township 12 NWD Plan 21065
OCP:
Existing: Urban Residential, Conservation
1107
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: RM-1(Townhouse Residential)
Surrounding Uses
North:
Use:
Single Family Residential
Zone:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation:
Urban Residential, Conservation
South:
Use:
Bare Land Strata Development
Zone:
RM-1(Townhouse Residential)
Designation:
Urban Residential, Conservation
East:
Use:
Townhouse Residential
Zone:
RM-1(Townhouse Residential)
Designation:
Urban Residential
West:
Use:
Vacant
Zone:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation:
Park, Conservation
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Townhouse Residential
Site Area: 0.809 HA (2.0 acres)
b) Project Description:
The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to
RM-1(Townhouse Residential) to permit a townhouse development.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need
to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact Official
Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further
development permits.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The subject property is designated Urban Residential (Major Corridor) and the proposed RM-1
(Townhouse Residential) zoning complies with this land use designation. An Official Community Plan
amendment application for a conservation boundary adjustment may be required.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RM-1(Townhouse Residential) to permit a townhouse development.
-2-
Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance
Permit application.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan, a Multi -Family Development Permit
application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with
compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with
neighbouring land uses.
Pursuant to Section 8.9 and 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection and a
Natural Features Development Permit application is also required as the subject site is within 50
metres of the top of bank of a watercourse (Cottonwood Creek) and the lands have an average
natural slope of greater than fifteen (15) percent. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection and
Natural Features Development Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and
enhancement of watercourses and natural slopes respectively.
Advisory Design Panel:
A Multi -Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel
prior to Second Reading.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a) Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
c) Environment Department;
d) Fire Department;
e) Parks Department;
f) School District.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading.
e) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedural Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended:
1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A);
2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C);
3. Multi -Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D);
4. Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F);
5. Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G);
12921
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed RM-1(Townhouse Residential) zone is in compliance with the Urban Residential (Major
Corridor) designation of the Official Community Plan. It is recommended that Council grant First
Reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6733-2010 subject to additional information
being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. It is expected that once complete information
is received, Zone Amending Bylaw No.6733-2010 may be amended and an Official Community Plan
amendment application for conservation boundary adjustment may be required.
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during OCP amendment, staff
recommend that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP
amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. It is,
therefore, recommended that Council not require any additional consultation.
Prepared by: Patrick Ward
Plan ni gTechnician
l
Appr n eri , MCP, MCIP
Director of Planning
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P
GM: Public orks Dev opment Services
Concurrence: J/L. (Jim) Ru4e
Chief Administrative Officer
PW/dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6733-2010
ME
appendix A
P,
LMP 112q
336
LM5 1325
38
4 ��So
714 19 9
3 77sos
20
11496
2 �o�
N
11491 21 '
1 P
11470 3 ¢
2 � m
11460 Cl) N N
o j 11523-236 St
2
U _ �t CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
N
.3raT, MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2-10
Appendix B
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6733 - 2010
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6733 - 2010."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 7 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 21065
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1480 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RM-1(Townhouse Residential)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200.
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200.
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the
PRESIDING MEMBER
day of
, A.D. 200.
CORPORATE OFFICER
EP 16618
A
3.782 ho
5
1.443 ho
L0
O
O
N
6 a
0.809 h0
r
71
LO
LO
O
0.809 ha
N
O Q1
W
r
to L
M
N
BCP 9604
N v
cn
v n
n
N
--- 1117
SCIP 1
4
11.
PARK
0.495 ha
N
V
5L1
CP
SL20
SL21
En
U)
vJ
�L1 C>I
I SL19
SL22 1
F'SL24
B
5
14
L17
ISL18
SL231
10 N
0.809 ho
a
A
EP 16722
2.002 ho
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No. 6733-2010
Map No. 1480
From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential)
To: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
71650
PARK
BCP 23179
116 AVE.
PARK
1.12 ho
LMP 11242
115J6
LMS 1325
38
1.36 ho
so
17 �
W
4
27
>>4�
19 •'so,,y
17496
20
v
2
1
�3" '�i
�- s 25
o
11494
1
21
123 24
22
22
1
L
P
50
83
N
rr��o
3-4
- 5
, 6
7
8
-9
1
h
N
ry
7
N
b
h
h
h
b
h
n
N
11460
1 :2500
MAPLE RIDGE
aritish columhia
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 30, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO: AL/010/10
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Application for Homesite Severance (Subdivision) of Land within the
Agricultural Land Reserve
12616 248 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This proposal for a homesite severance was reviewed by Council and forwarded to the
Agricultural Land Commission in 2007 (AL/108/07). The Commission denied the application;
however, the applicant has subsequently met with the Commission to clarify concerns. As a
result, the applicant has reason to believe that the application would be more favourably
received if resubmitted.
The parent parcel is approximately 5.8 hectares (14.3 acres) in size. The enabling legislation
and Commission policy direction are provided under Section 21 (2) of the Agricultural Land
Commission Act, and Policy 11 of the Agricultural Land Commission Act for Homesite Severance.
This policy provides for "aging in place" for long term residents in the Agricultural Land Reserve,
by allowing the subdivision of smaller parcels for rural residential purposes while retaining larger
land parcels for agricultural purposes.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Application AL/010/10 be authorized to proceed to the Agricultural Land Commission.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Existing:
Proposed:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses
North: Use:
Zone:
Anthony Schollen
Bernard A Schollen, Patricia A Schollen
Section: 23, Township: 12, Plan: RP7620
Agricultural
No Change
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
No Change
6 properties, 5 rural residential use, 1 vacant
RS-3 One Family Rural Residential
W&IT661
Designation
South: Use:
Zone:
Designation
East: Use:
Zone:
Designation
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Agricultural, 100% in the Agricultural Land
Reserve.
2 properties, rural residential use
RS-3 One Family Rural Residential
Agricultural, 100% in the Agricultural Land
Reserve.
5 properties, rural residential use
RS-3 One Family Rural Residential
Agricultural, 100% in the Agricultural Land
Reserve
2 properties, 1 rural residential use, 1 farm
RS-3 One Family Rural Residential
Agricultural, 100% in the Agricultural Land
Reserve
rural residential
no change
5.8 hectares (14.33 acres)
248th Street
municipal water
b) Project Description:
The applicant proposes to subdivide the property in accordance with the Homesite Severance
Policy of the Agricultural Land Commission.
c) Planning Analysis:
Policy 6-9 of the Official Community Plan is of particular relevance to this application. It relates
more specifically to the Provincial Policy Framework supporting agriculture, and states:
Maple Ridge supports the policies and regulations of the Agricultural Land
Commission Act and the Farm Practices Protection Act in its land uses and will
review its bylaws affecting farmland and farm operations for consistency with
these provincial acts, regulations, and guidelines.
Homesite severance applications may be viewed as unique in that they meet specific policy
guidelines of the Agricultural Land Commission to provide retiring farmers with aging in place
opportunities while minimizing the effects of parcelization of farm properties. The following
homesite severance guidelines pertain to this application:
1. Only one application per property, and the owner must provide evidence of continuous
occupation since December 21, 1972;
2. Previous subdivisions on the subject property may by considered by the Commission to
have fulfilled the objectives of the Homesite Severance Policy and further applications
may be denied on this basis; (this statement does not apply to this application as no
previous subdivisions have taken place on these properties)
3. The applicant must provide evidence showing a legitimate intention to sell the remainder
of the property upon the approval of the "homesite severance" application. Acceptable
-2-
evidence includes an interim agreement for sale, a prospective buyer's written
statement of intent to purchase, or a real estate listing; (this requirement is to be
fulfilled once final approvals are in place, and the property is ready to be registered at
the Land Title Office)
4. The existing homesite may be created as a separate parcel where it is of a minimum size
compatible with the character of the property but is exempt from having to meet
minimum parcel size under its zoning;
5. The remainder of the subject property after the homesite severance must be of a size
and configuration that will, in the Commission's opinion, either constitute a suitable
agricultural parcel, or be consolidated with adjacent farm property, or have a "no build"
covenant registered on it prohibiting residential buildings;
6. On approving a "homesite severance", the Commission will require that the homesite is
not to be resold for five years except in the case of estate settlements. The owner must
provide the Commission with a contractual commitment to this effect; and
7. Approved "homesite severance" applications qualify under Section 946 of the Local
Government Act insofar as compliance with local bylaws is concerned. This legislation
relaxes the minimum parcel size for qualifying properties that are within the Agricultural
Land Reserve.
The owners have resided on the property since before the creation of the Agricultural Land
Reserve and seek to retain a 0.8 hectare (2.02 acre) parcel to continue living there. The
remainder, should this application be successful, will be approximately 5 hectares (12.4 acres).
The applicant must provide the Commission with a contractual commitment to sell the larger
parcel at the time of registration of the newly created properties at the Land Titles Office.
d) Additional Considerations:
If this application is successful, a municipal subdivision application will be required in order to
complete this development proposal. Prior to approval, the applicant would have to demonstrate
compliance with septic disposal to municipal standards for both properties. Municipal water is
provided at this location. This subdivision application would require the creation of a panhandle lot,
and therefore is required to comply with the intent of Policy 6.02, the District's Panhandle Lot policy.
This policy notes that because of house locations and orientation associated with their geometry,
panhandle lots should be limited in circumstance and number. This policy sets out conditions where
such lots would be considered and addresses the common problems associated with the lot form.
This application appears to meet the intent of Part 1b) of the policy which allows panhandles under
the following circumstances:
Where there is no other subdivision possibility in an established area, and where there is no
possibility of a road being created to eliminate any need of a panhandle subdivision, and when
the lot being created will not affect the established amenity of the area by blocking views from
adjoining parcels.
Part 2 of the policy is also relevant. It states:
If the adjoining lots are to be subdivided, resulting in the creation of more than one panhandle
lot, the panhandles should be grouped together to form a type of cul-de-sac, utilizing a common
driveway and servicing area.
-3-
The adjoining lot to the south of the subject property also has a panhandle access. The applicant is
proposing to align the panhandle of the newly created lot with this existing panhandle in order to
comply with the policy. In compliance with the Panhandle Lot Policy, prior to creating this lot, the
property owner will be required to enter into a Section 215 restrictive covenant stipulating the siting
of any principal dwelling on the newly created lot. For the purpose of this application, it should be
noted that the proposed lot geometry can most effectively utilize the agricultural potential of the
property. Towards this purpose, the applicant is recommended to provide for the Commission's
consideration a proposed site plan that will show how the property may be accessed with farm
equipment.
e) Alternatives:
As with all applications by property owner to the Agricultural Land Commission, Council has the
option to deny forwarding this application, in which case the application will be considered
denied and closed.
CONCLUSION:
This application for subdivision with the Agricultural Land Reserve complies with the conditions
for homesite severance, which provides long term property owners within the Agricultural Land
Reserve with the opportunity to retire while still remaining in their homes. For this reason, this
application should be viewed in a different light than other applications for subdivision within the
Agricultural Land Reserve, which are discouraged by the policies of the Official Community Plan.
The recommendation is to allow this application to proceed to the Agricultural Land Commission,
with the understanding that should this application be successful, the application will have to
comply with municipal requirements for subdivision.
Prepared by: Diana Hall
Plan
*proved bJan ickerin CP, MC1P
- Di tannin
k f r
Approved by. Frank Quinn, MBA, P. En
GM: Public Works & p6velo ment Services
Concurrence: J. t. (Jim) Ruld
lief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A: Subject Map
Appendix B: Proposed Subdivision.
ME
' Appendix A
` -)- -7) r/rI y
t'A I, c" S
?z _
I
I
I
�co
Lq
IN
I
I
� I
r
I I
I !
S
I
.t
�V)
g
E
0
rn
{ If
N
NOTC
THIS DA^WwW IS T"K SOLE wry
or Cr,(/JTTZCM WASTIEWAT[A AND CN+MOT
SIC[D D USO" P%.Pr- ATCO IN ANY Ift—
MTMOIIt EXPRESS TT"1TTcm PERMISSION
248 STREET
200.86m
GENERAL SITE PLAN
1 :2000
Appendix B
I' LINE
rs�yfcS���-i�
A. R T .a ,. r
C. L GAEH
IF
NOTE AU - 04
DRAWING ADAPTED FROM SITE PLANS PROVIDED BY OWNER
IRO.IECT
12616 - 248 STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, BC
CLEARTECH WASTEWATER —L.
FIGURE 1 — SITE PLAN
cucwT, s`"" SHOWN I
"'l— CLR O..TE o• I;suc
BARNEY SCHOLLEN °i+"' CLR "�""D CLR AUG. 2004 104-0014 1 0
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 30, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO: AL/020/10
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Non -Farm Use Application in the Agricultural Land Reserve
24227 Dewdney Trunk Road
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This application for non -farm use in the Agricultural Land Reserve is made in accordance with
Section 20 (9) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act. The development proposal is for a
wireless communications facility. The applicant has provided community notification in
accordance with Federal guidelines.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Application AL/020/10 be authorized to proceed to the Agricultural Land Commission.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Cascadia Tower Inc.
Owner: Stephen B Harris, Marina G Harris
Legal Description: Lot: 5, Section: 22, Township: 12, Plan: 3118
OCP:
Existing: Agricultural
Proposed: No change
Zoning:
Existing:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed:
No Change
Surrounding Uses
North:
Use:
Rural residential
Zone:
RS-3 One Family Rural Residential
Designation
Agricultural
South:
Use:
2 properties, rural residential
Zone:
RS-3 One Family Rural Residential
Designation
Agricultural
East:
Use:
Rural residential
Zone:
RS-3 One Family Rural Residential
Designation
Agricultural
1109
West: Use:
Zone:
Designation
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
b) Project Description:
2 properties, school and BC Hydro Station
P1 Park and School, and RS-3 One Family Rural
Residential
Agricultural
Rural Residential
no change
4.0 hectares (5 acres)
Dewdney Trunk Road
The applicant proposes to install a wireless communications facility on a property that is within
the Agricultural Land Reserve and zoned RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Zone. In accordance
with Federal guidelines for regulating this use, the applicant has followed appropriate procedures
for notifying the community and has provided correspondence for this purpose. To date, no
correspondence has been received.
c) Planning Analysis:
In both the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan and the Zoning Bylaw, telecommunications
facilities are considered to be a public service use.
Official Community Plan
Policy 4 - 32 of the Official Community Plan states the following:
Public Service Uses, which provide essential services such as water, sewer, electrical,
telephone, or other similar services will be permitted throughout the community subject
to pertinent government regulations.
On this basis, this proposal is supportable in the Official Community Plan.
Zoning Bylaw
The Zoning Bylaw includes telephone service provision in its definition of public service use. Part
4 of the Zoning Bylaw (Permitted Uses of Land, Buildings and Structures) states:
(a) A Public Service use shall be permitted in all zones.
Part 4d, Section 403 of the Bylaw (Regulations For The Size, Shape And Siting Of Buildings And
Structures) lists the siting exceptions for antennaes as the following:
Freestanding lighting poles, warning devices, antennas, masts, utility poles, wires, flag
poles, signs and sign structures, except as otherwise limited in other Bylaws, may be sited
on any portion of a lot.
-2-
Section 6, part 4 of the Bylaw notes height exceptions as they apply to antennas:
The heights of buildings and structures permitted elsewhere in this Bylaw may be
exceeded for ... radio and television antennas; ....
Both the Official Community Plan and the Zoning Bylaw recognize these uses as a response to a
community need, permit them in all zones, and exempt them from restrictions regarding height,
siting or setback considerations. However, it should be noted that structures such as the equipment
compound for wireless facilities would be subject to restrictions regarding height, siting, and
setbacks.
d) Development Considerations:
An indefinite creek traverses the property to the north of its centre, which may trigger a Watercourse
Protection Development Permit prior to issuance of a building permit. To avoid visual impacts of this
proposed new facility, the applicant intends to cluster the development adjacent to the existing
Hydro Substation to the west of the subject property.
e) Intergovernmental Issues:
Federal Guidelines
Wireless communications facilities are under the jurisdiction of federal legislation. The Federal
government has provided guidelines for notifying the community where these uses are being
proposed. A dispute resolution process has also been established for cases where local
governments are reluctant to issue building permits for this purpose. For their part, municipal
governments can provide some direction as to their placement, and set standards for their visual
impact. However, local governments may not withhold a building permit if the applicant has met
standards for notification and has made a demonstrated attempt to satisfy community concerns
that are considered relevant by the federal government.
Agricultural Land Commission
The Agricultural Land Commission directs land uses in the ALR, and where utility uses are involved,
are not entirely consistent in their application process for these uses. Previously the District of
Maple Ridge has been handling these applications as Utility Corridor Use applications. The
Commission's recent position is that because these uses are not aligned in a corridor, they do not
meet the criteria for this application process. Therefore, the Commission asserts, a non farm use
application is required with Council endorsement prior to the application receiving Commission
approval. However, local governments have limited jurisdiction over these facilities, and it appears
that a denial on Council's part could be over -ruled by the Federal Government during a dispute
resolution process. It should be noted that the adjacent Hydro substation was handled as a utility
use application.
SLIM
The Agricultural Land Reserve Use, Subdivision And Procedure Regulation (which is administered
by the Commission) notes that this use could be permitted outright if its development footprint was
kept compact, as shown in the following excerpt from Section 3. (Permitted Uses For Land In An
Agricultural Land Reserve):
The following land uses are permitted in an agricultural land reserve ...:
(m) telecommunications equipment, buildings and installations as long as the area
occupied by the equipment, buildings and installations does not exceed 100 m2 for each
parcel;
This regulation indicates that a telecommunications facility could be permitted outright if its total
footprint remained within 100 m2 in area. However, in telephone conversation with a Commission
representative, it was confirmed that the Commission would prefer to have some input into the
siting of these uses so as to minimize their agricultural impacts. It was also suggested that the
cumulative total footprint (access, equipment compound, guy wires) of these uses usually greatly
exceeds this prescribed minimum. (This proposal shows a development footprint of about 250 m2.)
Therefore, the Commission's preference is that these proposals be forwarded as an application.
f) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The subject property is located on agricultural land. At the proposed location, the applicant has
provided consultation to affected property owners within a radius of 150 meters, which is equivalent
to 3 times the height of the proposed monopole, in compliance with Industry Canada standards. A
newspaper advertisement was also published on February 19, 2010. No respondents replied.
g) Interdepartmental Implications:
As this application will require the issuance of a building permit, the Licences, Permits, and Bylaws
Department will also be involved.
h) Alternatives:
Council has the option of not authorizing this application to proceed to the Commission, in which
case the applicant would have the option of ensuring the development proposal size remained
within the 100 m2 maximum footprint as prescribed in The Agricultural Land Reserve Use,
Subdivision And Procedure Regulation or appealing to the Federal Government to intervene in a
dispute resolution process.
CONCLUSION:
This application for a non -farm use complies with the direction as given by the Agricultural Land
Commission for the installation of wireless telephone facilities. The applicant has minimized the
visual impact of this proposal by locating it next to the existing Hydro substation. Community
notification has been provided, and no comments have been received. Council is recommended to
authorize forwarding this application to the Commission for their consideration.
2D 6W -i
Prepared by: Diana Hall
Planner 2_
AJ ed by: J e'Pick ' g, MCP, MCIP
r of Planning
Approved by Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
Public s & D elo ent Services
Concurrence: L. (Jim) RuTe
Ihief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Site Plan
Appendix C - Elevation
150
Appendix A
Subject Property
DEW NEV TRUNK NU, Dewdney Trunk Road
L i l f s I- - I
City of Pitt _
Meadows__'
f ; 0 24227 Dewdney Trunk Road
o CORPORATION OF
`*^ THE DISTRICT OF
N District of MAPLE RIDGE
Langley PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SCALE 1:3,500 �—� DATE: Mar 19, 2010 AL/020/10 BY: PC
FRASER
Appendix B
r
i
®
as
................
i
i
i
j
<
O
°
o
AO
co
m
2 l
� 3
3 m
z
a
o
m 0
n ry
98.00m.
�[
NEWQ2AVF.LRgA❑
_
T.
®
N
V
I
�
• -
�
'q�:iNo icCElS
�
X
CD
17
X I
L
F
O
!Yt
•I
�
a
�
x I
� o
2
m
-mi
Z
9
fA
m
—{
m
MA
v
O
•
n£
m
D
o
O
m
m
z
c
3
0
CD
G
m
Z
a
m
goo
Io�o�
0
"<N "? O
m
°
W
m.
n
O!
m
ou
ID
� J� 'c� D
'�
�
1
v
Em
a
a
C
-
0
�,
Appendix C
m
=
m
3ti
M •n'i
D
z
0
z
��
D�
PD
°o��5'
�m u '� ou
5O
r
p
(p
aF
A
a,7
m
@
"�"� '� m
D
m
m
m
V
`n D
W
A
—
07
Qp
A
F m = v
3
A=
N
FF
V< yn
3 �Z
N0
c
c0+
4#
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 15, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO: SP/011/10
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Soil Deposit Permit
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A Soil Deposit Application has been made by the District of Maple Ridge which falls under section 20
(3) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act for non farm use. This site is 1.173 Hectares and is
100% within the Agricultural Land Reserve. This application arises from the need to widen portions
of 2401h Street at 102"d Ave. These works are scheduled for spring 2010 and involve infilling of
approximately 200m of the open roadside ditch which is referred to as Mainstone Creek. This
portion of Mainstone Creek will be replaced with a closed culvert. The removal of this section of
Mainstone Creek will require compensation in order to achieve No Net Loss (NNL) of productive
capacity and to comply with the Federal Fisheries Act. The aim of the compensation is to create or
enhance habitat that has the same natural integrity, structure and function of the habitat that was
adversely affected. As there are space restrictions associated with 240th Street site a compensation
plan was developed within the Spencer Creek watershed located at 104th Ave and 105th Ave. The
compensation will involve the creation of a new side channel to Spencer Creek including in -channel
habitat areas and extensive planting of diverse riparian vegetation. The proposed site for the
compensation works is within the Agricultural Land Reserve. The works taking place on the site
involve the removal and introduction of soils.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the application for a fill permit under section 20 (3) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act,
for District of Maple Ridge properties located at the intersection of 104th Avenue and 105th
Avenue be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: District of Maple Ridge
Owner: District of Maple Ridge
Legal Description: District Lot 406 & 408, Group 1, DEDICATED PARK.
Group 1, DEDICATED PARK & PL 82384.
1110
-1-
OCP:
Zoning:
Existing: Parks within the ALR
Proposed: No Change
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Residential)
Proposed: No Change
Surrounding Uses
North:
Use:
Park
Zone:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation:
Parks within the ALR
South:
Use:
Farm
Zone:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation:
100% AGR (Agricultural)
East:
Use:
Agricultural Events Etc.
Zone:
CD-4-88 (Agricultural Events, Special Events, Etc.)
Designation:
PIA (Parks within the ALR)
West:
Use:
Residential
Zone:
RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium Density)
Residential)
Designation:
100% RES (Urban Residential)
b) Project Description:
In spring 2010 the District of Maple Ridge (DMR) intends to widen portions of 240 h Street in the
area of 102nd Avenue. This involves infilling approximately 200m of the roadside ditch which is
known as Mainstone Creek and replacing with a culvert. This infilling will result in a Harmful
Alteration, Disruption or Destruction of fish habitat (HADD) and will therefore require compensation
in order to achieve No Net Loss (NNL) of productive habitat. This is in compliance with the long-term
habitat replacement guideline of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
The level of compensation required for this project is too great to deal with on site and so an
alternative property was required; as outlined above. This compensation will include the creation of
a new side channel to Spencer Creek including in -channel habitat areas and extensive planting of
diverse riparian vegetation.
c) Planning Analysis/Environmental Implications:
The long-term habitat replacement guideline of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans is the
achievement of an overall net gain of the productive capacity of fish habitats. There is a no net loss
principle that is fundamental to the habitat conservation goal. This project will replace fish habitat
at greater than 1:1 ratio to achieve no net loss of productive capacity of local fish habitat.
-2-
The habitat compensation is needed to meet the principle of "No Net Loss" (NNL) in the productive
capacity of fish habitat. In many instances it will take time for habitat to become functional and in
some situations the compensation may not function as anticipated; therefore, the goal of this
project is to aim for greater than 1:1 compensation ratio.
The use of compensation to achieve no net loss is usually only considered when there is no other
alternative to a Habitat Alteration, Disturbance or Destruction (HADD) of fish habitat through project
relocation, redesign, or mitigation. In this case no other option was available as the 2401h Street
corridor is becoming a highly utilized transportation corridor as growth in this area of the District of
Maple Ridge continues. The widening of the 2401h Street corridor will result in a HADD as habitat
where fish reside and rear will be lost. As such compensation will be required. The compensation
will aim to create or enhance habitat that was adversely affected. As there is no room to create this
compensation directly on site, a compensation plan has been developed within the Spencer Creek
watershed.
To compensate for this loss of fish habitat, creation of fish habitat within Spencer Creek on District
of Maple Ridge property to the northwest of Mainstone Creek will be completed. This compensation
will involve creation of a new side channel to Spencer Creek including in -channel habitat areas and
extensive planting of diverse riparian vegetation.
d) Intergovernmental Implications:
Any fill being brought onto the site must be in compliance with the Department of Fisheries and
Oceans (DFO), Ministry of Environment (MOE) and the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC). The ALC
requires council comments.
e) Citizen/Customer Implications:
This property is within the Fraser River floodplain but in this instance there is no implication
regarding the displacement of water as the work being undertaken will create a new channel
adjacent to the existing channel. The volume of material being removed from the property (610m3
of Clay material) is almost equal to the volume being introduced (650m3 of landscape topsoil).
The works will rehabilitate a portion of designated park within the District of Maple Ridge and create
improved wildlife habitat.
f) Alternatives:
That a new site within the District of Maple Ridge be found to carry out the compensation works
required by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
-3-
CONCLUSION:
This application to bring fill onto the property is essential to contribute to a compensation package
required by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to offset the road widening works at 2401h
Street, Maple Ridge.
Prepared by: Michelle J nes
Envi ro n menta [ Technician
J
Ap roved Jan'&Pick'�FMCIP
Director anning
Approved by�Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
J GM: Public Works & Devg1oD r1j nt Services
Concurrence: J.L/Jim) Rule
Ctfief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
WE
Appendix A
3a9 352 7 a3j
380 z5�ba m 23 9 �y� 2 1�35 1pSa63S9 105 0542
36g 3a SS � 2s
z3�9� e qs 360 0 351 0536 3
3aa a 257 27 10521 OS 341
3 5 +n 3 1 28
2 B0 3g� � lows r0.s� 6 350
11 a 258 362 1034513 10518 3q2
�� 3a os11 65te 9
5 to3� 343
ag 363 348 10s10
269 yeAo2
Sa6 O 10503 364 °5 10s os 344
260 ,Og9y5 347 0 345
6 4 366 346
PARK
SUBJECT PROPERTY 09LF�
2 aho
3
9 2a2 lee °°6 ° fag
4
yap lee °�`�' '� 3,10
n
'L4'g Za6 ,oaP t9p3a
PARK PARK 23a err �a� a8 �oazz 373
2°0g,� w 2 �°q3 �p 10009
23°a9 2�� Zg9
P 77828 P 82384 q oar
2�6 10g15
374
13B95 270 10416 0
375 r
275 274 273 272 271 0a10 a
" 376 f°
N N 10406
104 AVE.
6
P 60014
1p320
City of Pitt U
Meadowsi,-,
ROLL #84208-0100-0
�i i o
u)
1n
y CORPORATION OF
Io
F:!:w THE DISTRICT OF
N
MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE District of Y�
Langley PLANNING DEPARTMENT
� _ � '
SCALE 1:2,500 —, - . �-
DATE: Feb 19, 2010 FILE: SP/011/10 BY: PC
SER R.
F •
British catumbia
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SU BJ ECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 8, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO:
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: COW
Liquor Primary License - Extension of Hours
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Changes to the liquor control and licensing regulations allow all liquor primary establishments the
ability to apply to the Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General to amend the establishment's
current licensed operating hours to anytime between the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. One of the
considerations utilized by the Ministry in reviewing an application is a recommendation from the
local government. The local government is asked to consider the application in terms of the potential
community impacts and provide a resolution in support of or against the requested amendment.
The Liquor Control and Licensing Branch have received an application from the Haney Hotel to
extend their opening hours on Sundays to 2:00 a.m. from the current 12:00 a.m. closing.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Whereas the District of Maple Ridge Council considered an application for the extension of operating
hours for a liquor primary license for the Haney Hotel; and
Whereas letters were sent to 367 surrounding residents requesting comment on the proposal and
55 negative responses were received; and
Whereas the Bylaw Enforcement Department are concerned that an extension of closing hours from
12:00 am to 2 am on Sundays will generate complaints from area residents in terms of negative
excessive noise generation and unruly behavior;
THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED THAT the District of Maple Ridge Council does not support the extension
of operating hours for the Haney Hotel liquor primary license.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The Haney Hotel has applied to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch for an extension to
the operating hours of their liquor primary license. The Haney Hotel has requested a 2 a.m.
closing time on Sundays as opposed to their current closing time of 12 a.m. The operator of
the liquor primary establishment has pointed out that a similar type of liquor primary licensee
on the west end of the community operates until 2 am on Sundays and he feels that he loses
business on Sundays due to the earlier closing hours.
The LCLB has requested a resolution from Council commenting on the application in terms of
any community impacts the extension of operating hours may have on the surrounding
neighborhood.
1) Community Input:
A letter was sent to 367 owners/residents in the immediate area requesting comments on
the proposal and 56 responses were received. Of the responses received, 55 residents
were concerned with the potential of late night noise and unruly behavior in and around the
property the establishment is located on. The letters received have been attached to this
report.
2) Impact on community:
Bylaw Enforcement staff are concerned that an extension to the operating hours on
Sundays may result in a number of complaints from area residents in terms of the
generation of unacceptable noise levels and unruly behavior within the immediate
neighborhood.
3) Alternatives:
Council may submit a resolution to the LCLB in support of the application or a resolution
indicating that Council is not interested in commenting on the application.
CONCLUSIONS:
Given the nature of the facility and the fact that neighborhood complaints concerning late night noise
and unruly behavior have been received in the past, staff is recommending that Council not support
the request to extend the operating hours of the Haney Hotel to 2 a.m. on Sundays.
Prepared by: Brock McDon
Direo-td'r of ns _i� and Bylaws
Approved by:fank Quinn
GM ok0eve�nq en Se ces and Public Works
Concurrence: Jim R le
Chie Administrative Officer
BM/sk
2
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
February 9, 2010
Dear Resident and/or Business Owner:
The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge has been requested by the British Columbia
Liquor Control and Licencing Branch to provide a resolution on a request by the Haney Motor
Hotel to change the Sunday operating hours for the liquor primary licence located at 22222
Lougheed Highway.
Currently, the Haney Motor Hotel can operate Monday - Saturday from Noon to 2:00 am and
on Sundays from 11:00 am to 12:00 am. They are requesting a change in the Sunday
operating hours from 11:00 am to 12:00 am to Noon to 2:00 am.
Should you consider yourself affected by this application, you may forward a written
submission by regular mail or by e-mail to the attention of the Director of Licences, Permits
and Bylaws by 4:00 p.m., March 1, 2010.
Council will be considering this matter at the Committee of the Whole meeting scheduled for
1:00 p.m. on March 15, 2010 in the Municipal Council Chambers located at 11995 Haney
Place, Maple Ridge.
Sincerely,
Brock McDonald
Director: Licences, Permits, and Bylaws
e-mail: bmcdonald@ma lerid e.ca
BMAd
District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Canada • Tel: 604-463-5221 • Fax: 604-467-7329
enquiries@mapleridge.ca • www.mapleridge.ca 100%Recycled Paper
Jaci Diachuk
From: Brock McDonald
Sent: February 12, 2010 11:35 AM
T Jaci Diachuk
Subject: FW:
For our Haney Hotel file
From: Hamel -Christiansen
Sent: Feb 12, 2010 11:20
To: Brock McDonald
Subject:
Dear Brock,
Thanks for the info on the Haney Motor Hotel. I personally don't care what their hours are, I think there
are other things that need to be addressed on a constant basis around here that are more of a concern to
me.:)
Rhonda Christiansen
02/15/2010
Jaci Diachuk
From: Brock McDonald
Sent: February 17, 2010 1:57 PM
T, Jaci Diachuk
Subject: FW: Haney Hotel
For the file
From: Jim Picton
Sent: Feb 15, 2010 16:42
To: Brock McDonald
Subject: Haney Hotel
Dear Sir,
As one who lives across the street from the hotel, I think we already have enough to put as it is
with the existing operating hours.
With simmer coming on the motorcycles revving up their engines (neccessary to keep the darn
things running) at closing time is enough to keep anyone awake but to have to stay awake until 2 am
another night is asking too much.
Do we not have enough drunks on the road already? — confirm this with the RCMP.
Crime rates go up as well as does wilful damage to property.
Why not spend a night out here to see for yourself what the neighbourhood puts up with on a
ni, .ly basis.
You will be very surprised to see just what goes on in this area during the night. To have more
kids fueled up on more beer can only increase the problems. Just watch the drug deals going on in KFC's
parking lot as dealer's wait for their share of drunks flow out of the bar.
Regards,
Jim Picton
02/ 17/2010
February 19, 2010
Dear Mr. McDonald,
In response to your letter dated February 09, 2010
concerning the request from the Haney Motel Hotel to extend
their hours of operation.
The residents who live at Maple Towers,11841, 222"d Street
will certainly be affected by the change in hours that Council
may be considering. Many residents already experience disturbed
sleep because of the amount and the level of noise.
We the undersigned strongly object to the change that has
been requested.
Haney Hotel PetitionFeb 2010 �
Name
Address
signature
Phone t
o -11841-222nd St.
- w4l.:
CJ
-11841-222nd St.
-11841-222nd St.
x
�; _�_ �G►t�
-11841-222nd St.
7
-11841-222nd St.
tO Z -11841-222nd St
�-r -11841-222nd St.
! L
-11841-222nd St.,,
.
����h7
-11841-222nd St.
-11841-222nd St.
I^ �-
�
-11841-222nd St.
y.
-
.-�
-11841-222nd St.1-
,3
, fvjAo I-6/ 6jv - C 5
-11841-222nd St.
ntl k_
f
J
-11841-222nd St.
4 l�,y
-11841-222nd St.
-11841-222nd St.
-11841-222nd St.
'f
S
�""�C'
• ❑ -11841-222nd St.
0 �,-11841-222nd St.
i
, [
-11841-222nd St.
I
711841-222nd St.
t
, -11841-222nd St.
_
F 11841-222nd St.
11841-222nd St.^
�_,�ft
; -11841-222nd St.
r ;
VI - �?
j
-11841-222nd St.
-
-11841-222nd St.
- —
-11841-222nd St.
N.
Hang Hotel PetitionFeb 2010
ame
Address
S'gnature
Phone #
7
-11841-222nd St.
.�
-11841-222nd St.
`
-11841-222nd St.
;
-11841-222nd St.
-11841-222nd St.
-11841-222nd St.
-11841-222nd St.
I'
-11841-222nd St.
.,
-11841-222nd St.
' J
C. f -11841-222nd St.
-11841-222nd St.
• V
-11841-222nd St.
f t.�
11841-222nd St.
L
_
-11841-222nd St.
R
-11841-222nd St.
-11841-222nd St..
:j
-11841-222nd St.
"
► r,
E -11841-222nd St.
s
-11841-222nd St.
7 1841-222nd St.
-11841-222nd St.
F
t` -11841-222nd St.
�!
-11841-222nd St.
r
` �11841-222nd St.
C '
-11841-222nd St.
-11841-222nd St.
-11841-222nd St.
1 '14 -11841-222nd St.
f
Jaci Diachuk
From: Brock McDonald
Sent: March 1, 2010 1:12 PM
1 Jaci Diachuk
Subject: FW: Haney Motor Hotel
Please copy and add to binder. Thanks.
From: MYA TAUERS
Sent: Mar 1, 2010 10:40
To: Brock McDonald
Subject: Haney Motor Hotel
Dear Mr. McDonald,
We are residential neighbours of the Haney Motor Hotel, and would just like to go on record as
being strongly opposed to the operating hours changing to 2:00 am.
Thank you for your time,
Rob and Mya Pritchard
03/05/2010
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE:
and Members of Council FILE NO:
March 16, 2010
E04-010-064
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
Local Area Service - 202 Street (Chatwin Avenue to Mclvor Avenue)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At the December 9, 2008 meeting, Council authorized staff to prepare a bylaw to establish a Local
Area Service (LAS) to provide sanitary sewer service to 14 lots on 12300 and 12400 Block of 202
Street.
The construction of the sanitary sewer service as authorized is now complete and the total cost of
the works has been confirmed at $118,292.24.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
THAT Maple Ridge 202 Street Sanitary Sewer Services Bylaw No. 6692-2009 be given first, second
and third readings.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
A Local Area Sanitary Sewer Service to 14 residences on 12300 and 12400 Block of 202
Street was authorized by Council. Construction is substantially complete and final costs have
been determined. The permanent pavement repair works is scheduled for summer 2010.
The number of properties included in the LAS has been reduced from 15 to 14. The property
owner of 12437 202 Street has opted out in the LAS and will not be allowed to tie into the
202 Street sanitary sewer main. The property owner has an agreement with the developers
of the subdivision at Mclvor Avenue and was promised a sanitary sewer connection from
Mclvor Avenue.
b) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The petitioners, in the majority, agreed to bear the expense of the service estimated to cost
each of them a commuted sum of $9,322.95 on the first petition on August 11, 2008. Each
of the benefiting property owners will pay the final individual commuted cost of $8,449.45,
represents a considerable cost -saving to each of the benefitting property.
The owners now have the option to either pay off the final commuted cost or pay by fifteen
annual installments, amortized at an interest rate of 6.25% with an option of paying off
anytime during the term without incurring a penalty. This long-term interest rate is based on
prevailing market borrowing rates that would be available to the municipality.
1112
The above cost to the property owner provides a sanitary sewer connection to the system at
the property line. In order to complete and commission the service, owners will then need to
install, at their cost, a connection from the residence to the sanitary service connection at
the property line.
c) Interdepartmental Implications:
The Property Tax section of the Finance Department will provide the details to the property
owners, and subject to each owner's decision, either receive the commuted payment from
the individual property owners or impose a levy in the amount of the final actual cost and
place a notation on the tax roll of the property owner.
CONCLUSION:
The project is now complete and final costs have been determined. A bylaw to establish this LAS is
recommended.
Prepared by: Mapf rra, PEng.
Proiec ng-ineer
Reviewed by: JAr1drew Wood, PhD., PEng.
unic' al Engineer
Approved y: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEn
G ral Mana er: P lic rks & Development Services
Concurrence: J.L (Jim) Rul ,
Cifief Administrative Officer
MG/mi
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO.6692-2009
A Bylaw to establish a Local Area Service for Sanitary Sewer Services on 202 Street
WHEREAS Council has been petitioned to provide a municipal service pursuant to Section 210,
Division 5 of the Community Charter S.B.C. 2003, c.26 (the "Community Charter");
AND WHEREAS The Corporate Officer has certified that the petition received for the municipal
service does constitute a sufficient petition signed by majority of the property owners,
representing at least half of the value of the parcels that are liable to be specially charged;
AND WHEREAS Council has deemed it expedient to proceed with the works;
AND WHEREAS the `Maple Ridge Local Area Service Policy', as amended, provides that the cost
of providing a municipal service shall be recoverable from each of the existing parcels of land
that will benefit from the service.
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge enacts
as follows:
1. This Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as "202 Street Sanitary Sewer Services Bylaw
No. 6692-2009".
2. The Local Area Service is described as 145m of 200mm sanitary sewer on 202 Street
from Chatwin Avenue to Mclvor Avenue, the boundaries of which are outlined in
Schedule `A' attached.
3. The Local Area Service has been completed and final cost of the service is contained in
Schedule `B' attached.
4. Costs for the Local Area Service will be recovered according to the cost distribution shown
on Schedule `C' attached.
READ a first time the day of
, 2010.
READ a second time the day of
2010.
READ a third time the day of
2010.
RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the
day of 2010.
PRESIDING MEMBER
Attachments Schedules A, B, & C
CORPORATE OFFICER
4
N-
►.�
1
12461
N
r*1
12461
�
h �
12451
12450
---
McIVOR
AVENUE
12445
F'
ui
w
12437
12440
N
12430
12425
N
Z
12425
12426128
0
�o
12415
J
J
Q
72421
12422
12405
w
w
12411 N
12402
�Q2�
0
2�2
cV
12399
12400
>2389 l 112392
72383 I 112382
12375
� h
CHATWIN AVENUE
0
N o0 90 N
ao
o 0 0 0
0
N N N N
N
t
CORPORATION OF
THE
N
P■�=
DISTRICT OF MAPLE
RIDGE
ENGINEERING
2S RVE
123 AVE. w
OEK9Pi Y ii211 RI7.
DEPARTMENT
202 STREET SANITARY SEWER SERVICES
L v a J
BY—LAW 6692-2009
SCHEDULE "A"
,00 AVE
SCALE:
k"EQ +wr.
N.T.S.
DATE:
FEBRUARY 2010 FILE/DWG No
SK 0318
Completion Certificate
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
Date: February 3, 2010
Schedule B
By -Law 6692-2009
File: E04-010-064
This is to certify that the Works authorized under the `Maple Ridge
Local Area Service for Sanitary Sewer Extension (202 Street -
Chatwin Avenue to Mclvor Avenue) are complete.
Andre ood, PhD., PEng.
Municipal Engineer
As required under the `Maple Ridge Local Area Service for Sanitary
Sewer Extension (202 Street - Chatwin Avenue to Mclvor Avenue), I
hereby certify that the final cost of the Works has amounted to
$ 118,292.24.
Trevor Thompson, CGA
Manager of Financial Planning
cc Corporate Officer
Manager, Revenue & Collections
Schedule C
By-law No. 6692-2009
Engineer's Report
Deep Roots
Greater Heights Final Costs & Apportionment
Local Area (Sanitary Sewer) Service
by Formal Petition
Pursuant to Section 10 of the `Maple Ridge Local Area Service for Sanitary Sewer Extension (202
Street - Chatwin Avenue to Mclvor Avenue), the following provides the final costs and
apportionment thereof.
Sanitary Sewer Service
Location: 202 Street - Chatwin Avenue to Mclvor Avenue
Total cost of the Works
Municipal contribution (0%)
Cost apportioned to existing 14 parcels
Cost Distribution
Number of existing lots
Individual Owner's share (Cost per lot)
Per annum individual Owner's share
(Amortized over 15 years at 6.25 % per annum)
Life of the Works
All costs are final
$118,292.24
Nil
$ 8,449.45
14
$ 8,449.45
$ 884.25
40 Years
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE: April 7, 2010
FILE NO: E02-010-150
ATTN: C of W
Award of Contracts No. ITT-EN10-131 and ITT-EN10-137
Downtown Road and Utility Rehabilitation Project
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Downtown Road and Utility Rehabilitation Project received grant approval under the Building
Canada Fund - Communities Component program. The project will be constructed in two phases.
The first phase is on Lougheed Highway between 222 Street and 224 Street and on 224 Street
between Lougheed Highway and Spirit Square. The second phase, on 224 Street from Spirit Square
to Dewdney Trunk road will be constructed later in 2010 or possibly in early 2011.
The construction of the first phase has been tendered and closed on March 16, 2010. Six (6)
compliant bids were received. The tender prices range from $3,425,196.20 to $4,492,100.00 with
the average tender price being $3,772,958.65. Imperial Paving Limited is the lowest tender at
$3,425,196.20 excluding taxes. Imperial's relevant recent experience includes the Canada Line
reconstruction of No. 3 Road in Richmond. These costs are within the approved budget.
Imperial Paving Limited is an experienced contractor and the tender analysis concluded that they are
well qualified to perform the work. Imperial Paving Limited has worked with the District in the past.
A separate tender for the supply of streetlights, traffic signal poles (Contract No. ITT-EN10-137) was
issued on February 24 to expedite the delivery of these supplies. Seven (7) tenders were received on
March 5, 2010. Five (5) of the tenders were not accepted because they did not meet the tender
requirements or the specifications. The lowest accepted tender was $240,220.00 excluding taxes
submitted by Guillevin International Co.
Finally, ISL Engineering and Land Services Ltd. (ISL) is the Engineer of Record for the design of this
project. The estimate for their services, post design is $87,430.00. This includes a traffic impact
study, development and analyses of pavement rehabilitation options, Open House material,
construction tender documents, tendering support, and construction services during construction.
It is recommended that the construction be awarded to Imperial Paving Limited, that the
streetlighting supply contract be awarded to Guillevin International Co. and that the engineering
services contract for ISL to be increased by $87,430.00.
1113
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Contract ITT-EN10-131 for Downtown Road and Utility Rehabilitation, be awarded to Imperial
Paving Limited in the amount of $3,425,196.20 plus taxes; and
THAT Contract ITT-EN10-137 for Supply of Streetlights, Traffic Signal Poles and Accessories for the
Downtown Road and Utility Rehabilitation Project, be awarded to Guillevin International Co. in the
amount of $240,220.00 plus taxes; and
THAT the total engineering services contract for ISL Engineering and Land Services Ltd. be increased
by $87,430.00 plus taxes, and further
THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contracts.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
In July of 2008, Council established the objective to focus on the Town Centre and construct
street improvements, support developments in the Town Centre, improve the pedestrian and
shopping experience and rehabilitate the infrastructure.
The construction of Spirit Square and improvements on 224 Street between 119 Avenue and
McIntosh Avenue was completed in the summer of 2009. In late 2009, the District received
a significant infrastructure grant to complete improvements to Lougheed Highway from 222
to 224 Street and on 224 Street between Lougheed Highway and Dewdney Trunk Road and
engaged ISL Engineering and Land Services Ltd. to initiate the designs.
The construction of the project is phased into two sections: the first phase is on Lougheed
Highway between 222 Street and 224 Street and on 224 Street between Lougheed Highway
and Spirit Square. The second phase is on 224 Street from Spirit Square to Dewdney Trunk
Road.
Construction Contract - Phase 1
The design and tender package for the first phase was completed and was tendered on
February 23, 2010 for a three week duration closing on March 16, 2010. Six (6) compliant
tenders were, received and evaluated.
The results of the tender evaluation below are listed in order from highest to lowest points.
Tenderer Tender Price
1.
Imperial Paving Limited
$3,425,196.20
2.
Columbia Bitulithic (Lafarge Canada Inc.)
$3,499,100.00
3.
Double M Excavating Ltd.
$3,587,934.91
4.
Tybo Contracting Ltd.
$3,663,085.90
5.
Wilco Landscape Westcoast Inc.
$3,803,439.90
6.
Tag Construction Ltd.
$4,492,100.00
Imperial Paving Limited is a qualified contractor with relevant experience including the
reconstruction of No. 3 Road in Richmond for the Canada Line Project. Their subcontractors
are Crown Contracting (for electrical) and Blue Pine Enterprises (for landscaping). Both are
qualified contractors.
Imperial Paving Limited is proposing to complete, after award of the contract, the works on
Lougheed Highway between 222 Street and 224 Street within130 working days and the work
on 224 Street between Lougheed Highway and Spirit Square by the end of June.
As such, staff is recommending that the construction be awarded to Imperial Paving Limited.
Streetlight and Signal Poles Supply Contract
The streetlighting supplies contract for Phase 1 was tendered separately to expedite the
delivery of the poles and luminaires. Seven (7) tenders were received on March 5, 2010.
Four (4) tenders submitted alternatives to that specified in the Invitation to Tender, but these
alternatives did not meet the specifications and were not accepted. The accepted tenders
are listed below starting with the lowest tendered price.
Tenderer Tender Price
(excluding taxes)
1. Guillevin International Co. $240,220.00
2. Nedco $240,622.23
3. Westco Distribution $242,331.72
Staff recommend that the streetlight supply contract be awarded to the lowest accepted
tender of $240,220.00 from Guillevin International Co.
Engineering Services
District staff retained the services of ISL Engineering and Land Services Ltd. (ISL) in 2008 to
carry out the detailed design of the first phase of the Downtown Road and Utility
Rehabilitation Project. Engineering services following the detailed design is estimated at
$87,430.00. This will bring the total fees for ISL to $210,000.00. Accordingly under the
District's Purchasing Policy, Council approval is required for these additional amounts.
b) Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome of this report is to obtain Council approval to award the necessary
contracts and commence construction in April 2010 so that the work on 224 Street can be
substantially complete before the start of the summer festival and events at Spirit
Square. The work on Lougheed Highway will be completed in the late fall.
This work will improve the roads with new sidewalks, landscaping, street surfacing, street
lighting, improved accessibility and a new storm sewer. The street experience of all users will
be greatly improved.
This work is being funded significantly by a federal and provincial grant.
c) Strategic Alignment:
The project is intended to revitalize the downtown, making the area more pedestrian friendly
and enhancing the connection of the park to adjacent businesses which is a key Council
priority.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
A Project Liaison Committee (PLC) has been established and has provided input and advice
to the project team. The PLC includes representation from local businesses, residents,
accessibility groups, the Chamber of Commerce, and the general public. The PLC meets
monthly and project staff are invited to the meetings. The meeting notes of the PLC are also
posted on the website. Efforts . are being made to ensure that businesses, residents,
shoppers and the travelling public are notified of the construction impacts. Information will
be posted on the website, ads and other channels. (Other groups have been consulted that
have some interest in this project, including the BIA, Accessibility Committee, Events and
Bicycle Advisory Committees.)
The contract requires that disruptions to the area be minimized and that the impact to
businesses and residents be minimized. There is also a requirement for the Contractor to
complete the road and sidewalk construction on 224 Street by the June 15 (dependent on
the award date of the contract) to minimize impacts during summer festivals and events at
Spirit Square.
Some businesses have requested night work to minimize impact to businesses and
conversely, at the Open House, there was concern by residents on the impact of night
construction on their livability and the duration of the work. Based on a constructability
assessment, the tender call was structured to facilitate and encourage extended work hours
into the evening, with consideration to noise levels.
The Contractor's proposed work plan and schedule indicate and suggest that all construction
except the final paving will be done during working hours (a 7:00 am start has been
indicated). At the minimum, paving will be done at night. However, the working hours will
continue to be assessed on the actual work plan and schedule, and will be reviewed by staff
based on feedback from businesses and residents.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
The installation of a fiber optic conduit for District communication network has been included
in the contract. Operations Department have been involved during design stage and will be
involved during construction with tie-ins for water, storm and sanitary, and inspection
services.
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The construction and streetlighting contracts for this portion of the project are within the
budget for the contemplated work.
These contracts represent the majority of the work planned under the Downtown Road and
Utility Rehabilitation Project which in total is expected to cost about $5.6 million.
Grant funding from both the provincial and federal governments has been secured for two
thirds of the project costs.
The total project estimate is:
Engineering and Technical Services $ 450,000
Phase 1 Construction (including materials) $4,000,000
Phase 2 Construction $1.150.000
Total $5,600,000
CONCLUSIONS:
The construction of the Downtown Road and Utility Rehabilitation Project has been separated into
two phases.
To advance the project, staff recommend that the construction contract for Phase 1 be awarded to
Imperial Paving Limited, the streetlighting contract be awarded to Guillevin International Co. and that
ISL Engineering and Land Services Ltd. contract be extended.
Prepared by: Richard W Eng.
Manager sign and Construction
Reviewed by: Andr Wood, PhD., PEng.
N'PAicipal Engineer
Financial review by: ```trevdffhompson, CGA
Ma ge FiparwlPlanning
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, ng.
gRneral IAnag . P blic Works & Development Services
Concurrence: ].L)
Chi
im7 RA
Administrative Officer
District of Maple Ridge
MAPLE RIDGE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 19, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO: E08-015-1104
E01-052-001
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 140/10
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A developer has subdivided land at 236 Street and 112 Avenue. Part of the subdivision servicing is
considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local Government Act. The
extended servicing benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC 140/10 provides the
municipality's assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or extended servicing to the
benefiting lands.
RECOMMENDATION:
That with respect to the subdivision of lands involved in subdivision SD/104/07 located at 236
Street and 112 Avenue, be it resolved:
1. That the cost to provide the excess or extended services is, in whole or in part, excessive
to the municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall be paid by the owner
of the land being developed, and
2. That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or extended services on the parcels
and in the amounts as set out in the staff report dated March 19, 2010; and further
3. That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Excess Capacity Latecomer
Agreement LC 140/10 with the subdivider of the said lands.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The attached map identifies the lands which are involved in the subdivision and those which
will benefit from the excess or extended services. The cost breakdown for each excess or
extended service is shown on attached Schedule A.
1114
In addition, a copy of Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 140/10 is also attached for
information purposes.
b) Strategic Alignment:
Administration of excess or extended services legislation complies with the Smart Managed
Growth element of the Corporate Strategic Plan. The administration procedure supports the
requirement for a developer to construct municipal infrastructure in support of land
development and recognizes that the infrastructure may provide benefit to other land.
c) Policy Implications:
Part 26, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all
or part of the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality shall determine the
proportion of the cost of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and
determine the proportion of the cost of the service to be attributed to parcels of land which
the municipality considers will benefit from the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 140/10
will provide such determination for subdivision SD/104/07.
CONCLUSION:
A developer has provided certain services in support of subdivision SD/104/07. Some of the
services benefit adjacent lands therefore, it is appropriate to impose Latecomer Charges on the
benefitting lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 140/10 summarizes the municipality's determination of
benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the term over which such Latecomer
Charges will be applied.
Prepared y: tephen Judd, P.Eng.
Manager of Infrastructure Development
Review d y:%ndrew Wood, PhD., P.Eng.
V
Engin
Approved by/GM,
Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng.
i Iic WW45 & De op nt Services
Concurrence: J.L. im) Rule
Chi f Administrative Officer
Ij I/ kk
Schedule A
TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE
1. ONSITE SERVICE FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY
SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF COST PER BENEFIT
LOTS BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED
BY PROPERTY
EXCLUDING
SUBDIVISION
Storm Sewer 12
(Statutory
Right of Way)
2. EXTENDED NOMINAL SERVICE
$29,868.00 $2,489.00
Lot 11, PI BCP21397
RN 84151-0141-0
1 x $2,489.00
SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF COST PER BENEFIT
LOTS BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED
BY PROPERTY
EXCLUDING
SUBDIVISION
Sanitary 14 $71,498.00 $5,107.00 Lot 22, PI 39988
Sewer (236 St RN 84532-0101-8
& Gilker Hill 7 x $5,107.00
Rd.)
Storm Sewer 9 $61,398.00 $6,822.00 Lot 22, PI 39988
(236 St) RN 84532-0101-8
3 x $6,822.00
A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows_
List Properties Amount of Benefit
Lot 11, D.L. 404, Gp. 1, Plan BCP21397, NWD $2,489.00
Lot 22, Sec. 16, Tp. 12, Plan 39988, NWD $56,215.00
a 0_
0_ a
Q-
a-
a
V U
m
m
mm
W
o
_LI
F.7 A
N
dWl
133aS 301SN3380
TzgsiddO8
W
t9E
o
133ULS 3a1SN33UO
0
O
a W
0i
=
N
N
N
M
N
d
N
In
N
00
Cl
rti ^ 0)
z
go
O W
O
z
3NVl 301SN3321O
U N
`�
h00
�'
I--
O E+
W A
3
p
9s£Z
00 L�9£
� lt'9F
fl0 M
Fs£Z
C40 6�9f
ELF F�s£�
U
L9F�
(
r
p 0 ao = N G4
N N ° ps9F� LL-
� 0 00 U Z U E"
z a LU
6 lZ 08 — w
a 9�9F1m A o
w 1332iLS V9£Z 0� Oi'9Fl� . r M [qqF N
Z rI N V CO r LO lJ 2
i N N ry `t �_ }. rt LO 0
N Zyi Q7 r c i 'of , N r Q
LL'W Ur LL
O Or �oN OM O� O O� O L4J'd LL D U
cD V• � c� ry •. •. O O U � •-
h hLLj.Qf
s96ty doa
' M m
133HIS 9£Z n
N r
r
n.
L
m
U
S'a9F
N 0�
::::::::::::::::::off,
F.
85F� Ml
°'
—
S58Z l
m
LFZ,
w
aoF—
.N '� IiJ.
NM 'wn
•Z O.
-w O.
Q]
U
rn
r
m
0
M
m
0
O�
m
LO rolb
0 A�
m
N r
J
C-V IL8 d
Q
v
tY
Q
0
z
O
m
z
O
V)
0
m
D
N
III
0
w
0 r-
Fw- W \
x m o
LLI
w
o
F- (' (n
QCL Q
(n O
Uw
U r•
C)
N 0=
C) J
X
W
vi
F•-I U ~
V Z
EXCESS CAPACITY LATECOMER AGREEMENT
LC 140/10 — SD/104/07
THIS AGREEMENT made the day of , 2010:
BETWEEN:
Ron Davis and Margit Davis
P. 0. Box 21027
Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 1P7
(Hereinafter called the "Subdivider")
AND:
OF THE FIRST PART
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under
the "Municipal Act", having its offices at 11995 Haney Place, in the Municipality of
Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia
(Hereinafter called the "Municipality")
WHEREAS:
OF THE SECOND PART
A. The Subdivider has developed certain lands and premises located within the
Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more
particularly known and described as:
Lot 4, Section 16, Township 12, Plan 24650, N.W.D.
(Hereinafter called the "said lands")
B. In order to facilitate the approval of the subdivision of the said lands, the Subdivider
has constructed and installed the storm sewer and sanitary sewer services shown on
the design prepared by Damax Consultants Ltd., Job No. 110N.W.D. (Sheets 1 to 12)
dated January, 2009. Project No. E08-015-1104.
(Hereinafter called the "Extended Services");
C. The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands
and other than the said lands;
D. The Municipality considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive;
Page 1 of 4
E. The Subdivider has provided the Extended Services in the Amount of $162,764.00.
F. The Municipality has determined that the following properties:
Lot 22, Section 16, Township 12, Plan 39988, NWD; and
Lot 11, District Lot 404, Group 1, Plan BCP21397, NWD
(the "Benefitting Lands") will benefit from the Extended Services;
G. The Municipality has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands
connecting to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the "Latecomer Charge") on
the Benefitting Lands in the following amounts:
Lot 11, District Lot 404, Group 1, Plan BCP21397, NWD (RN 84151-0141-0)
• $2,489.00 for connection to the storm sewer which parallels the north boundary
of Lot 11, Plan BCP21397, from the manhole at the east property line of 236
Street to Creekside Street.
Lot 22, Section 16, Township 12, Plan 39988, NWD (RN 84532-0101-8)
• $5,107.00 per lot to a maximum of $35,749.00, for connection to the sanitary
sewer on Gilker Hill Road and 236 Street, from the manhole 85 metres west of
236 Street to the manhole 24 metres south of 112A Avenue; and
• $6,822.00 per lot, to a maximum of $20,466.00, for connection to the storm
sewer on 236 Street, from the manhole 24 metres south of 112A Avenue to the
manhole at Gilker Hill Road, 10 metres west of 236 Street.
plus interest calculated annually from the date of completion of the Extended
Services as certified by the General Manager - Public Works and Development
Services of the Municipality (the "Completion Date") to the date of connection by the
Benefitting Lands to the Extended Services;
H. The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and
collected by the Municipality shall pursuant to Section 939 (7) of the Local
Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 be paid to the Subdivider as provided for in
this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 939 (9) of the Local Government Act
R.S.B.0 1996, c. 323, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by
the Municipality within fifteen (15) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to the
Subdivider and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of the next June 30t" or
December 31st that follows the date on which the Latecomer Charge was collected by the
Municipality.
Page 2of4
2. This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any
purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer Charge by the Municipality to the
Subdivider, or fifteen (15) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the Municipality
shall be forever fully released and wholly discharged from any and all liability and obligations
herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer Charge, and whether arising before
or after the expiry of this Agreement.
3. The Subdivider represents and warrants to the Municipality that the Subdivider has
not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from the
owner of the Benefitting Lands for the provision, or expectation of the provision of the
Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein; and further
represents and warrants that he has not entered into any agreement with the owner of the
Benefitting Lands for consideration in any way related to or connected directly or indirectly
with the provision of the Extended Services. The representations and warranties of the
Subdivider herein shall, notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Agreement, survive the expiry of
this Agreement.
4. The Subdivider (if more than one corporate body or person) hereby agrees that the
Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in equal
shares.
5. If the Subdivider is a sole corporate body or person, the Municipality shall remit the
Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the following
(name and address of director of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.):
6. In the event that the Subdivider is not the owner of the said lands, the owner shall
hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto the Subdivider, his heirs and assigns, all
rights, title and interest under this Agreement.
Page 3 of 4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective Corporate
Seals, attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf, the
day and year first above written.
SUBDIVIDER:
Authorized Signatory - Ron Davis
Authorized Signatory - Margit Davis
The Corporate Seal of the CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE was
hereunto affixed in the presence of:
Corporate Officer -Authorized Signatory
Page 4 of 4
MAPLE RIDGE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 31, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Race the Ridge 2010 Bike Race
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A request has been received from Cycling BC to use municipal streets at three venues for the Race
the Ridge 2010 Bike Race on Saturday May 1, 2010 between 9:00 am and 2:00 pm, and Sunday
May 2, 2010 between 8:00 am and 6:00 pm. A copy of the request is attached.
Authorization from Council is requested to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the Race the Ridge 2010 Bike Race on Saturday
May 1, 2010 and Sunday May 2, 2010, provided the conditions of Schedule 'A' attached to the
staff report dated March 31, 2010 are met.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for
organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually
given on condition that the District be indemnified against any liability for injury or damage
resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as "Schedule
A."
The three venues for the Race the Ridge 2010 Bike Race are as follows:
1. Road Race - Saturday May 1 from 9:00 am to 2:00 Qom
Start and finish will be at Thornhill Hall on 98 Avenue. Participants will travel west on 98
Avenue to 256 Street, travel north on 256 Street, turn west on 100 Avenue and turn
north on 248 Street, travel east on 102 Avenue to 100 Avenue and proceed south on
268 Street to 98 Avenue. From 98 Avenue they will travel west to 264 Street, turn north
to 98 Avenue, travel west to the finish line.
1115
There will be no road closures. However, this event will require that the traffic be
stopped as riders start and finish and at intersections as riders pass through.
2. Golden Ears Park Time Trial - Saturday May 1 from 4:00 pm to 6:00 _pm
This race will take place in Golden Ears Provincial Park and will start and finish at the
main gates. Traffic control will be provided. (Information only - BC Parks permit is
pending)
3. Town Core Criterium -Sunday May 2 from 8:00 am to 6:00 m
This race will take place in the Maple Ridge town core and will start and finish on
McIntosh Avenue at 224 Street. Participants will travel west on McIntosh Avenue turning
south onto 223 Street, travel south on 223 Street to 119 Avenue traveling east on 119
Avenue to 224 Street and travel north to Haney Place Loop. This will be the feature
event and will utilize Memorial Peace Park.
This event will require the following road closures:
• Haney Place road;
• 224 Street, between Selkirk Avenue and Dewdney Trunk Road;
• 223 Street, between 119 Avenue and Dewdney Trunk Road;
• 119 Avenue, between 223 Street and 224 Street;
• McIntosh Avenue, between 223 and 224 Street; and
• Fraser Street, between Haney Place road and Dewdney Trunk Road.
b) Strategic Alignment:
Administrating Maple Ridge street events allows the District to manage road infrastructure
and associated risks but yet allows events that promote community development,
commemorate and celebrate community accomplishments and highlight Maple Ridge's
natural and built features.
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets may cause some minor delays and inconveniences to
other road users. However, traffic control will be provided by Race the Ridge volunteers.
In addition, the organizers will be distributing an information letter to affected businesses
and residents.
d) Governmental Implications:
The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP
for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as
coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company.
e) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal
streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff
processing effort.
f) Policy Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices.
g) Alternatives:
The District could refuse to permit the event to occur at this location. In this event, the
organizer may have to cancel the event.
From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events
and activities. Race the Ridge Bike Race has been held successfully for previous years and the
organizers have requested permission to hold the Race the Ridge Bike Race on municipal streets for
2010.
Submitted by: A���food, PhD., PEng.
7:Z
Engi
'
Approved by Frank Quinn, MBA, PEn
GeAeral Mappger: ub c Works &Development Services
Concurrence: J.V_(Jim) Rul�
C ief Administrative Officer
/mi
Schedule 'A' To Council Memorandum Dated March 31, 2010
Race the Ridge 2010 Bike Race
Condition of Approval
Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers:
1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the
R.C.M.P., and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District);
2. notify local Fire Department, and Ambulance Services of the event;
3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses;
4. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of
the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date);
5. notify all affected businesses on the event route as soon as possible (per letter provided by the
District) ;
6. make arrangements for all surrounding businesses and residents for access purposes
during the event. A time interval schedule of closure and permitted vehicular access
during the event for residents wishing to access their property;
7. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out
of or in any way connected with the event;
8. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability
insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST
have the following statement written in the policy:
"Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy
shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in
writing to the District."
Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy
shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the
Corporate Officer prior to the event;
9. obtain any the required permits/permission from other agencies;
10. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which
existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction
of the District;
11. must maintain access for emergency services to the closure area at all times.
The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw this permission to
use municipal streets should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements.
Chief Administrative Officer
Race The Ridge Bike Race
Attention: Barry Lyster
22459 132" d Ave.
Maple Ridge, BC V4R 2P6
604-466-2016 or 604-312-3318
EVENT INFORMATION
Building on the success of hosting seven years of quality bike racing, we will again be
hosting a 2-day, 3-event road bike stage race event in the District of Maple Ridge. I will
again be requiring road closures and municipal support. Please find the information
required for the permit below.
Thanks again for supporting cycling in our community.
Sincerely,
Barry Lyster
Director of Cycling Operations
Local Ride Bike Shop/ Race The Ridge
EVENT INFORMATION
Date: May 1-2, 2010
Location: Maple Ridge
Predicted Participation: 200 per event
Number of events: 3
Web Site: www.localride.com
Insurance: 5 million liability from Cycling BC
MAPLE RIDGE ROAD RACE
Date:
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Time:
9 am to 2 pm
Location:
Thornill
Start/Finish:
Old Thornhill Elementary 100th Ave. @ 256th Street
Staging Area:
Old Thornhill Elementary
Course Length:
10 km
Road Closures:
None
Proposed Course: (See Map)
Roads Used: 2561h Street, 1001h Ave., 248th Street, 102nd Ave., 2681h Street.
961h Ave. 98th Ave, Race will follow a clockwise direction.
Traffic Control: Traffic will be stopped by course marshals as riders enter
and exit course corners. Race in progress signs will be
situated around the course and at all roads leading into the race
course. There will be no permanent road closures and there should
be minimal impact to traffic. Race groups will be accompanied by
a lead and follow vehicle as well as a wheel vehicle. We will
attempt to notify as many residents as possible to inform them of
the event. We have also contact the Auxillary Police and will be
hopefully using their services again this year.
TOWN CORE CRITERIUM
Date:
Sunday, May 2
Time:
8 am to 6 pm
Location:
Memorial Park and 1 square block west of 224th Street (see map)
Start/Finish:
224th Street and McIntosh Ave.
Staging Area:
Band Stand, Memorial Park
Proposed Course:
(see map)
Road Closures:
2241h Street (Dewdney Trunk Road to Selkirk Avenue)
223rd Street (Dewdney Trunk Road to I I9th Avenue)
McIntosh Avenue (223rd Street to Leisure Centre)
I l9th Avenue (223rd Street to 2241h Street)
Ring Road around Memorial Peace Park
All alley ways and vehicle access points.
Traffic Control:
This will be a closed course to vehicle traffic. Course marshals
will be at all major intersections and alley ways. Barricades,
traffic cones and race tape will be used to separate vehicles and
pedestrians from the race course. Local residents will be permitted
through the closed off areas between races and when directed by
course marshals.
GOLDEN EARS PARK TIME TRIAL
(information only, BC parks permit is pending)
Date:
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Time:
4 pm to 6 pm
Location:
Golden Ears Provincial Park
Start/Finish:
Main Gates, Golden Ears Park
Staging Area:
Main horse corral parking
Proposed Course:
(see map)
Road Closures:
None
Traffic Control:
Traffic control will be at the Start/Finish, the turn -around point and
at Mike Lake Road, Boat Launch road and Day Use area road.
-Di
C3
272 st
I /
I - r
k
AQ:>4 01
I-., 11-16 s I
W
Pa,
w
co
C:
4--
400,
0
0
r
L
7
Edge St a-
03
L.L
C
Garden St
iy
Plaza St
> 222 St
U
M
Q]
I
Fraser i ci
as
224_k
2i
® i
Q3
❑7
223 St
26 SI
1
r
G
W
H
0
03
�5
CL
Z31
F--
0
0
Fran€
c
—
222 Si
c
0
c
0
_
0
M
o
c�a
tLf A.
�
to E
,
aU
J
MAPLE RIDGE District of Maple Ridge
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 31, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: 2010 Heart and Stroke Big Bike Ride
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A request has been received from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of BC & Yukon to use municipal
streets for the 2010 Big Bike Ride on Friday, April 23, 2010 between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm. A copy
of the request dated March 24, 2010 is attached. Road closures are not anticipated for this event.
Authorization from Council is requested to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the 2010 Heart and Stroke Big Bike Ride on
Friday, April 23, 2010 between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm, provided the conditions outlined in
Schedule 'A' attached to the staff report dated March 31, 2010 are met.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for
organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually
given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability for injury or
damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as
"Schedule A".
The ride route will start at the Haney Place Mall parking lot at 226 Street where the riders
will travel northbound on 226 Street to McIntosh Avenue and continue to Edge Street to
Dewdney Trunk Road. They will travel east on Dewdney Trunk Road to Burnett Street and
travel southbound on Burnett Street to Lougheed Highway. They will travel westbound o
Lougheed Highway to 225 Street and northbound to Selkirk Avenue returning to Haney Place
Mall parking lot at 226 Street.
1116
b) Strategic Alignment:
Administrating Maple Ridge street events allows the District to manage road infrastructure
and associated risks but yet allows events that promote community development,
commemorate and celebrate community accomplishments and highlight Maple Ridge's
natural and built features.
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Permission to use streets may cause some minor delays and inconveniences to other road
users. However, traffic control will be provided by the Big Bike Ride volunteers.
d) Governmental Implications:
The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain approval of the RCMP
and Fire Department for traffic control and must notify BC Ambulance Services as well as
coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company.
e) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal
streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff
processing effort.
f) Policy Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices.
g) Alternatives:
The District could refuse to permit the event to occur -at this location. In this event, the
organizer may have to cancel the event. However, this event has a history in this community.
CONCLUSIONS:
From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of streets for various events and
activities. The Big Bike Ride for the Heart and Stroke Foundation has been held in Maple Ridge in
past years. The organizers have requested permission to hold the event on municipal streets for
2010. N
Submitted by: �r-oy W6od, PhD., PEng.
Municipa n er
Approved by: Fr a Quinn, MBA, PEng.
G : P-ublic Ww*s & D e1 ment Services
Concurrence: J. L. (J' {} Rule
Chie Administrative Officer
Schedule 'A' To Council Memorandum Dated March 31. 2010
2010 Heart and Stroke Big Bike Ride
Condition of Approval
Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers:
1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the
RCMP, Fire Department and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District);
2. notify local Ambulance Services of the event;
3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses;
4. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of
the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date);
5. notify all affected businesses on the event route as soon as possible (per letter provided by the
District);
6. make arrangements for all surrounding businesses and residents for access purposes
during the event;
7. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out
of or in any way connected with the event;
8. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability
insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST
have the following statement written in the policy:
"Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy
shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in
writing to the District."
Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy
shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the
Corporate Officer prior to the event;
9. obtain the required permission from Haney Place Mall to use their facilities;
10. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which
existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction
of the District; and
11. must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times.
The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw this permission to
use municipal streets should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements.
Chief Administrative Officer
03-25-10;08:43AM;Hart 3r,J Sroke foundatior,
;604 472 0055 # 2/ 4
HEART&
STROKE
FOUNDATION
OF BC A YUKON
Finding answers. For life.
200.1212 West Broadway
Vancouver, BC V6K 3V2
T: 604.736 * 4404
F: 604.736.6732
Chair
Dr. Doug Clement
President & CEO
Bobbe Wood
REGIONAL OFFICES
Kamloops
250.372.3938
Kelowna
250.660.6275
Nanalmo
250,754,5274
North Vancouver
604.983,8492
Prince George
250.562.8611
Richmond
604.279.7130
Surrey
604.591.1955
Trl-Citles
604.472,0045
Vancouver
604.73 6.4 086
Victoria
250.392,4035
For more heart and
Stroke Information:
www.heartandnroke.bc.ca
1.888.HSF.INFO
(1.886.473.4636)
3/24/2010
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
1 ] 995 Hanev Place
Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9
Fax: 604-467-7331
Attention: Mathew Li, Engineering Department
Re. 2010 Hearr&Stroke Big Bike wRide
Dear Mathew:
Heart&Stroke
I am writing to request permission for a fundraising event to take place in Maple Ridge on
April 23, 2010. Please review and approve the proposed route by signing this letter on the appropriate
signatory line (below) and returning by fax to 604-472-0055. We have applied for the insurance and will fax
the certificate to you once received. We have also advised the Police, Fire Department, Ambulance and BC
Transit of this event.
Route Description: Start at Haney Place Mall parking lot by Haney Place & Antique Mall
Left on 226th
Proceed on 226'4 until it turns left into McIntosh
Right on Edge St.
Right on Dewdney Trunk Rd
Continue on Dewdney until Burnett
Ti i n1't on Bufneu
Right on Lou heed Hwy
Right on 225, into Haney Place Mall parking for
Right on Selkirk and continue until left into parking lot starting point
This event involves our thirty -.seat Hearf&Stroke Big Bike and we will be scheduling rides between
9:OOAM and 8:OOPM. This has become an extremely successful fundraising event in the province of BC
and has had very generous support of the community and we look forward to your continued support. If you
have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
Lori Whalley
Special Events Coordinator,
Serving Tri-Citics &- the Fraser Valley
T #:604-472-0045 F #:604-472-0055
Buslness number 118B1 B343 RR0001
Corp. of the District of Maple Ridge concurrence
of the above proposed event:
Authorized Signature
Date:
IS
22
ILLD
--JLS 1-JANUMS
LL
LU
-228 ST.
LU
w LU
F fL ST-C H ER- ST ~ z LU
IF
LLL
Z1.
LU y
W
is
z
IS LZZ
�j
0
w
L -4
LL
I
J-s-9zz i;r
LU
-Q
W. Loh
LU
IS 30(31
LU
!I=
0
0
V1,
Lo
E
C.
LU
Lo
LU
C)
(P
CL
co
Lo
z
-i OC
2i
CL
Lo
m
LU
LU
M
LU -Ijc 10
-
U
C)
0
>
cz
z
z LU -i
LU Ld
j Z
Lo
CD
0
IDZ
0
Ld
LLJ
u G 0 8:5
— c u
in a-
_j
LLJ
u
Lr�
COE
Eli
vc
M)o
It
Cq
-
0 21
Cc)
-Z-O
co,
a)
a)
� C:
2
EO
oE�C
E
cz o 0
03-25-10;08;43AM;Hart and Sake foundation ;604 472 0055
# 3/ 4
Ref. No, 320006131642
Aon Rood Stenhouse Inc.
900 Howe Street Re; Evidence of Insurance with respect to the following:
P.O. Box 3228 Event: Heart & Stroke Sig Bike Ride
Vancouver BC V613 3X8 Oate(s): April 23, 2010
iel 604-US-4442 for GD4-6624026 Location: Maple Ridge, BC
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9
Insurance as described herein has been arranged on behalf of the Insured named herein under the following pdicy(ies) and as more fully described
by the terms, conditions, exclusions and provisions contained In the said policy(ies) and any endorsements anachad thereto.
Insured
Heart & Stroke Foundation Of B.C.& Yukon
1212 West Broadway, Suite 200
Vancouver, BC V6H 3V2
Coverage
Commorcial General Liability Insurer Royal 9 Sun Alliance Ins Co of Canada
. ......................................... ............................................................ ................................................
....._
Polley 1f COM034700520
Effective 01-Sap-2009 Expiry 01-Sep-2010
Limits of Liability Bodily Injury & Property Damage, Each Occurrence $5,000,0D0
Personal Injury $5,000,000
Tenant's legal Uabillty - All Risks $260.000
Policy may be subject to a general aggregate and other aggregates where applicable
Hdditionai insured
Only with respect to the above and arising out of the Named Insured(s operations are the following name(s) added to the policy
as Additional Insured(s). The policy Ilmlts are not Increased by the addition of such Additional Insured(s) and remain as stated
in this Certificate.
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge to the extent of coverage required by written contract or written agreement between
the Named Insured and Additional Insured with respect to Commercial General Liability
Cancellation / Termination
The Insurer will endeavour to provide THIRTY ( 30 ) days written notice of cancelladonllerminatlon to the addressee except that
statutory or policy conditions (whichever prevails) will apply for non-payment of premium.
THE POLICY CONTAINS A CLAUSE THAT MAY LIMIT THE AMOUNT PAYABLE
1 of 2 OR, IN THE CASE OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE,
THE POLICY CONTAINS A PARTIAL PAYMENT OF LOSS CLAUSE AM
03-25-10;08;4SAM;Hart and Sroke foundation ;604 47% 0055
# 4/ 4
Ref. No. 320006131642
THIS CERTIFICATE CONSTITUTES A STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AS OF THE DATE OF ISSUANCE AND ARE SO
REPRESENTED AND WARRANTED ONLY TO Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge. OTHER PERSONS RELYING ON
THIS CERTIFICATE DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK
Aon Read StLlouseInc.
Dated: 23-March-2010
Issued By: Cheung,Loretta S
Tel : (604) 443-3335
2 of 2
THE POLICY CONTAINS A CLAUSE THAT MAY LIMIT THE AMOUNT PAYABLE
OR, IN THE CASE OF AUTOL40BILF INSURANCE,
THE POLICY CONTAINS A PARTIAL PAYMENT OF LOSS CLAUSE AM
District of Maple Ridge
MAPLE RIDGE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO, His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: April 1, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Disbursements for the month ended January 31, 2010
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Council has authorized all voucher payments to be approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor, together
with the Director cf Finance. Council authorizes the vouchers for the following period through Council
resolution. The disbursement summary for the past period is attached for your information.
Expenditure details are available to any Council member for review in the Finance Department.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the "disbursements as listed below for the month ended January 31, 2010 now be approved".
GENERAL $ 8,704,980
PAYROLL $ 1,307,571
PURCHASE CARD 80,519
$-IQ�r�93,070
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and
provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services.
The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan.
b) Community Communications:
The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial
disbursements.
1131
c) Business Plan / Financial Implications:
Highlights of larger items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution
•
City of Pitt Meadows - Cost share road repairs Sharpe to Neaves
$
213,078
•
GCL Contracting & Engineering - Kanaka Creek bridge replacement
$
249,802
•
G.V. Sewerage & Drainage - Jun to Dec'09 DCC collection
$
381,005
•
G.V. Water District - Water consumption Nov 4 - Dec 1/09
$
297,173
•
Mierau - Fire Hall No. 1 expansion
$
181,730
•
Minister of Provincial Revenue - 2009 school tax requisition
$
755,824
•
Municipal Insurance Assoc. - Insurance assessment
$
397,564
•
Pryke Lambert Leathley Russell - Land acquisition 137 Avenue
$
1,564,661
•
Wiilis Canada Inc. - Property and All Risk Insurance
$
203,447
d) Policy implications:
Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice.
CONCLUSIONS:
The disbursements for the month ended January 31, 2010 have been reviewed and are in order.
llayv- -
Prepared by: G'Ann Rygg
Ac::ounting Clerk II
Approved by: T r v ampson, CGA
Monager of Financial Planning
Approved by: Pau Gill, A, CGA
GlA - -CQrporate,&' In ci ervices
Concurrence: J.L.. (JimyF ule
Chief A ministrative Officer
gmr
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS -JANUARY 2010
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT
Associated Engineering(BC) Ltd
Kanaka Creek bridge replacement
BC Hydro
Hydro charges Jan
BC SPCA
Contract Jan
Community Animal Centre development - 50% share
BDO Dunwoody
2009 Financial statement audit
Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd
Maintenance: Banners
Camera installation
Christmas lights & banners
Firehall #1 exhaust fan installation
Illuminated sign repairs
Pole replacements
Pole repairs
Street lighting
Street light pole replacement
UPS installations
CUPE Local 622
Dues - pay periods 10/01 & 10/02
Canadian Recreation Excellence
Ice rental
Chevron Canada Ltd
Fuel Jan & Feb
City Of Pitt Meadows
Cost share RCMP school liason & community police office
Cost share road repairs - Sharpe to Neaves Road
Memorial benches
Coral Engineering Limited
Leisure Centre heat recovery solution
Da-Mazz Games Inc
Tax sale refund
Double M Excavating Ltd
Clear logjam - Park Lane
Roadworks Cottonwood Drive
Downtown Maple Ridge Business
Downtown security assistance
First Truck Centre Vanc Inc
Utilimaster walkin van
Fitness Edge
Fitness classes & programs
GCL Contracting & Engineering
Kanaka Creek bridge replacement
Gr Vanc Sewerage & Drainage
Waste disposal
Jun - Dec'09 DCC collection
Greater Vanc Water District
Water consumption Nov 4 - Dec 1/09
Happy Heart Fitness & Educ
Weight room supervision & childcare activity room
ISL
Brown Avenue Phase 2
Lougheed Hwy revitalization
Maple Ridge signal analysis
Jacks Automotive & Welding
Fire Dept equipment repairs
Kerr Wood Leidal Associates
Seismic upgrade to existing water feeder main - River Road
Water servicing reviews
Manulife Financial
Employee benefits premiums
Maple Ridge Historical Society
Quarterly fee for service payment
McTar Petroleum Ltd
Road salt
Medical Services Plan
Employee medical & health premiums
Mierau
Fire Hall No. 1 expansion
Minister Of Provincial Revenue
2009 school tax requisition
MJT Enterprises Ltd
Skating lessons
Morrison Hershfield Limited
Leisure Centre boiler replacement
RCMP jail cell
Municipal Insurance Assoc
Insurance assessment - 2010
Insurance deductibles
Municipal Pension Plan BC
Pension remittance
Oracle Corporation Canada Inc
Software license & suppor'.
Panorama LMS 4011
Strata fees Jan & Feb
23,013
110.574
662
331
529
197
906
75,075
248
8,605
3,252
6,510
57,756
213,078
934
2,070
20.664
475
281.005
3,323
15,861
3,039
24,026
1.832
26,324
9,244
397,564
1.165
AMOUNT
59,391
82,380
133,587
20,721
96,315
19,474
46,137
107,070
271,768
137,142
310,406
22,734
100,000
131,674
25,391
249,802
381,480
297,173
22,028
22,223
20,558
25,858
103,942
31,205
33,522
26,163
181,730
755,824
28,786
35,568
398,729
274,587
23,797
16,570
Paul Bunyan Tree Services
Tree removal at various locations
19,761
Pitt Meadows Heritage & Museum
Semi-annual fee for service
36,712
Pryke Lambert Leathley Russell
Land acquisition - 23100 block of 137 Avenue
1,564,661
Radian Communications Services
Communications tower
79,774
Raincity Janitorial Sery Ltd
Janitorial services Dec & Jan:
Firehalls
6,352
Library
10,539
Municipal Hall
5,388
Operations
5,623
Randy Herman Building
8,277
RCMP
6,634
42,813
Receiver General For Canada
Employer/Employee remit PP09/27, PP10/01 & PP10/02
811,923
Retirement Concepts Develop.
Security refund
100,000
Ridge Meadow Comm Arts Council
Art Centre grant Jan & Feb
89,574
Event Pro software
1,773
Gift certificates
120
Membership 2010
100
Program revenue Dec
14,852
Public Art Admin & program startup fees
9,500
Subsidized program fee
1,440
Theatre rental & catering
2,074
119,433
Ridge Meadows Seniors Society
Quarterly operating grant Jan - Mar
39,899
Ridgemeadows Recycling Society
Monthly contract for recycling Jan
86,746
Weekly recycling
290
Litter pick-up contract
1,787
88,823
Sandpiper Contracting Ltd
Relocate PRV chamber Lougheed & DTR
28,035
Signature Office Interiors
Fire Dept office furniture
28,926
T & T Auto Parts Ltd
Tire changer
15,064
Tempest Development Group
Property tax & utility billing software maintenance
43,178
Terasen Gas
Natural gas
41,848
Terasen Gas Inc
Gas main on new 240 Street bridge
31,757
Tybo Contracting Ltd
Spirit Square
15,000
Warrington PCI Management
Advance for Tower common costs Jan
50,000
Tower expenses Nov
8,925
58,925
Wedler Engineering
256 Street sanitary extension
29,560
Water pump station
3,255
32,815
Willis Canada Inc
Property and All Risk Insurance
203,447
Workers Compensation Board 3C
Employer/Employee remittance 4th qtr 2009
66,759
Young Anderson, "In Trust"
Appraisal & legal fees - 12600 block of 224 Street
4,879
Land expropriation - 108 Avenue
35,000
39,879
Young, Anderson - Barristers
Professional fees Dec
31,404
Disbursements In Excess $15,000 8,034,571
Disbursements Under $15,000 670,409
Total Payee Disbursements 8,704,980
Payroll PP10/01 & PP10/02 1,307,571
Purchase Cards - Payment 80,519
Total Disbursements January 2010 10,093,070
GMR
\\dove\Cap. Serv.\Finance\Accounting\Accounts Payable\AP Remittances (Disbursements)\2010\[Monthly CouncV Report 2010.xls]JAN'10
11
MAPLE RIDGE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
Revenue Anticipation Borrowing Bylaw
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
DATE: March 23, 2010
FILE NO:
ATTN: COW
The Community Charter allows municipalities to borrow funds to meet legal financial obligations in
advance of the collection of property taxes. A Revenue Anticipation Borrowing bylaw would allow the
municipality to establish an operating line of credit so that temporary funds could be accessed at
favourable interest rates, rather than having to redeem investments to meet unanticipated cash
requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Bylaw No 6729-2010 be given first, second and third readings.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The District's Investment Policy and investment approach focuses firstly on safety, then on
liquidity and finally on the return on investments. Investments that are very liquid and
callable without penalty are used to meet the spikes in cash flow requirements. These
investments earn slightly less interest than could otherwise be earned if the funds were
locked into a specific term.
Section 177 of the Community Charter anticipates that some municipalities may need to
borrow funds on a short term basis each year to meet the legal financial obligations prior to
the collection of the main source of municipal funds - property taxes.
While the District does not require borrowing to meet our financial obligations, a Revenue
Anticipation Borrowing bylaw would provide an additional resource to balance the timing of
investment maturities and required expenditures and provide a contingency for cash flow
purposes.
TD Canada Trust is the financial institution used by the District. The current agreement with
them provides for a $1,000,000 Operating Line of Credit at a favourable interest rate. The
Municipal Finance Authority also provides short term borrowing at competitive rates.
Page 1 of 2
1132
b) Desired Outcome:
To provide the District with additional opportunities to maximize investment income.
c) Strategic Alignment:
The District's Investment policy and efforts to maximize investment earnings are in line with
Council's Financial Management strategies to provide cost effective, efficient and timely
services and to identify methods to expand non -tax revenue.
d) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The Financial Plan includes earnings projections on District's investments. This bylaw would
allow staff some flexibility to cover timing differences in peeks of cash flow requirements.
It may allow for additional funds to be committed to fixed term investments and result in
slightly more in interest earnings.
e) Alternatives:
Without this Revenue Anticipation Borrowing bylaw, the District may be required to redeem
an investment to ensure appropriate cash flow or continue to carry slightly more funds in
very liquid investments that may result in slightly less earnings. Investments are currently
made with the knowledge of expected cash flow requirements.
CONCLUSIONS:
The approval of a Revenue Anticipation Borrowing bylaw would provide the District with additional
opportunities to maximize investment interest revenue.
Prepared by: Kathleen Gormley,
Manager of Business Systems
Reviewed by: revor Thri pson, BBA, CGA
Manager of Financial Planning
Approved by: Pain Gill, ,BA, CGA
GM: Corporate and Firyarfic�al Services
Concurrence: J.L/(Jim) Ruler
Cbfief Administrative Officer
Page 2 of 2
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO.6729-2010
A Bylaw to provide for the borrowing of money in anticipation of revenue
WHEREAS the Council deems it desirable to maximize interest income by investing surplus funds and
expedient to provide an additional source of funds where it is in the best interest of the District to
borrow for a short term rather than initiate the early redemption of an investment;
AND WHEREAS it is provided by Section 177 of the Community Charter that Council may, without the
assent of the electors or the approval of the Inspector of Municipalities, provide for the borrowing of
such sums of money as may be necessary to meet the current lawful expenditures of the
municipality provided that the total of the outstanding liabilities does not exceed the sum of:
a) The whole amount remaining unpaid of the taxes for all purposes levied during the current
year, provided that prior to the adoption of the annual property tax bylaw in any year, the
amount of the taxes during the current year for this purpose shall be deemed to be 75% of
the taxes levied for all purposes in the immediately preceding year; and
b) The whole amount of any sums of money remaining due from other governments;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled,
enacts as follows:
1. This Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as "Revenue Anticipation Borrowing Bylaw No.
6729-2010".
2. The Council shall be and is hereby empowered and authorized to borrow from the Municipal
Finance Authority and the financial institution used by the District upon the credit of the
municipality an amount or amounts not exceeding the lesser of the amount calculated in
accordance with the foregoing, and ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000), in such amounts
and at such times as may be required.
3. The form of the obligation to be given as acknowledgement of the liability shall be a
promissory note or notes bearing the corporate seal and signed by the Mayor and Financial
Administrator as required by the Municipal Finance Authority or a line of credit or a daily
overdraft as required by the District's financial institution.
4. All unpaid taxes and the taxes of the current year when levied or so much thereof as may be
necessary shall, when collected, be used to repay the money so borrowed.
READ a first time the day of 2010.
READ a second time the � day of 2010.
READ a third time the day of 2010.
RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of 2010.
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
�.
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
Webster's Corners Neighbourhood Park
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
DATE: April 6, 2010
FILE NO:
ATTN: Committee of the Whole
A concept plan for this park was prepared through community participation by residents on a park
steering committee. The Steering Committee has considered the input from residents and the
adjacent Webster's Corners Elementary School to establish the amenities that are most desired to
be incorporated in the concept plan.
This concept plan will be considered on April 8th, 2010 by the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks
and Leisure Services Commission with a recommendation that Maple Ridge Council approve the
concept plan and direct staff to proceed with the preparation of tender documents.
The support of the concept plan by area residents suggests that the process should now proceed
with the development of detailed drawings for the purpose of issuing a tender for construction.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the concept plan for Webster's Corners Neighbourhood Park dated March 16th, 2010 and
attached to this report, be approved and staff be authorized to prepare tender documents for the
construction of this park.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The park planning process for this site was started in 2008, and its completion delayed until this
year. Because of the length of this process it is important that the details of how the concept plan
evolved, and how the public was engaged in this process, are shared with Council.
Parks staff had an initial meeting with the Webster's Corners Community Association on October 1st,
2008 to discuss the neighbourhood park planning process and invite the Association to participate
by having a member of their Board join a park steering committee once it was established. The
Association indicated their interest and would advise later who their appointee would be.
On November 13th, 2008 a neighborhood park design information meeting was held at Webster's
Corners Elementary School. A mail out was sent to 500 area residents within the school catchment
area to announce this meeting, with twenty one persons signing in at the meeting. Surveys of
desired park amenities were collected from those attending this meeting, and attendees were asked
Page 1 of 5 1151
to indicate on the sign in sheet their interest to be on the steering committee. Six individuals came
forward to be on the steering committee.
The first park steering committee meeting was held on February 11th, 2009 with six members
attending. The Committee discussed the spatial needs for various park amenities with overheads
projected to show how much space was required for, play equipment, sport courts and fields. The
overheads demonstrated the site constraints and impacts on useable area. The group also
considered the information gathered at the November 13th meeting and through two surveys that
were conducted at two previous Webster's Corners Days that listed specific park amenities that
respondents would prefer to see in a neighborhood park design.
A list of the most popular park amenities was generated for discussion. The Committee selected
those amenities that were most desirable to be included in a draft concept plan for the next meeting.
The budget for this park was discussed as was the cost of specific park amenities. The Committee
determined, based on the available budget, that the concept plan should focus on providing the
most popular park amenities that currently do not exist on the school site. For example there is play
equipment for primary to age 12 on the school site, so the focus on the park design should be to
provide for preschool to primary aged children. A sport court exists on the school site therefore the
design should focus on providing another type of amenity. There was discussion about providing a
playing field, however the cost estimated at $300-400,000 was beyond the scope of the park
budget, a field existed on the school site and based on the surveys collected to date a playing field
was not identified as one of the desired park amenities.
Four members attended a meeting March 25th, 2009 where the first draft concept plan was
presented. Some revisions were requested to focus on providing amenities that did not exist either
at the school or parks in that vicinity (Cliff Park). It was decided that a site meeting was in order to
determine the condition of existing facilities at the school and review the park site. Four members
attended the site meeting on April 1st. Following this meeting minor revisions were made to the plan
in advance of the next meeting.
Three members attended the April 7th, 2009 meeting where the concept plan was finalized prior to
presentation to the public at an open house. The concept plan was then shared with nine members
of the school PAC and School Administrators on April 8th, 2009 where consensus was a unanimous
endorsement for the concept plan.
After announcing in the local newspaper an open house would be held on April 22nd, 2009 to display
the final concept plan, Parks staff became aware of a clerical error on their part. Staff had recorded
the incorrect email address for one couple on the steering committee email distribution list.
Because of this mistake staff had not been inviting this couple to the steering committee meetings
following the initial meeting on February 11th.
Staff also learned at this point that they did not have the representative appointed by the Webster's
Corners Community Association on the steering committee email distribution list, and, as a result,
this individual had not been participating in the committee meetings. At the initial information
meeting an individual did verbally acknowledge that they had been appointed to represent the
Community Association, however this individual did not make reference on the sign in sheet that
they would like to be on the steering committee. Staff had thought that one of the six who had
signed up were also on the Community Association, unfortunately this was not the case.
Page 2of5
Staff proceeded with the Open House meeting on April 22nd, 2009 where 13 people attended. Of the
nine comment sheets submitted, seven indicated support for the concept plan with two respondents
not supporting the design concept.
Following the Open House a letter, dated May 27th, 2009, was sent by the Webster's Corners
Community Association which raised needs/issues that went beyond the scope of works proposed
for a neighbourhood park, (ie. a community gathering space, heritage preservation) which required
additional dialogue with the Association. Staff understood that decisions regarding community
needs may have an influence on the ultimate park plan, (ie. should the current residence be retained
for community/caretaker use, what were the plans for the neighboring Sampo Hall, should the park
design include school amenities).
A meeting was held with the Park Steering Committee and representatives from the Community
Association on June 9th, 2009. The discussion focused on the issues raised in the May 27th letter
and the process that was followed to gather information and develop the concept plan.
As time was running out on completing a design for construction before the winter, it was suggested
to the Steering Committee that further work on the design concept be postponed until the issues
raised by the Community Association could be addressed. The objective would be to forward a final
design concept in the spring of 2010 for authorization to proceed with preparation of a detailed
design for construction during the summer of 2010.
Staff proceeded with an assessment of the existing residence to determine the feasibility of the
structure for assembly use. It was determined that based on the design of the residence there was
insufficient space to accommodate both a caretaker and meeting space. The complications of
making the structure comply with Building Code requirements for an assembly use were determined
to not be feasible.
A hazardous materials assessment was also completed as this would be required before the
residence could be demolished as per the park concept plan. Some building materials were found to
be contaminated with asbestos and these materials can be safely removed prior to demolition.
While the park design process was postponed, staff maintained contact with the Community
Association, to insure the park design process remained on track to resume early in 2010. The
Association indicated that they were looking for answers to the following three questions:
a) Was Metro Parks (formerly GVRD Parks) consulted to determine their plans for the area?
b) Was the School District involved in the park design process?
c) Had the owner of Sampo Hall been contacted and what are the plans for the hall and
property?
The concept plan for the park was shared with Metro Vancouver Parks (Metro) for their review in the
context of their long term interests in the north arm of the Kanaka Creek system. Metro advised
staff that the concept plan would be complementary to any future Metro ecological/recreation
corridor expansion up the north arm of Kanaka Creek. It would be possible to tie future Metro trails
into the park concept trail network. The proposed slope setback, preservation of existing vegetation
and meadow treatment in the concept lent itself to easy integration with an ecological corridor.
The School District was involved in the park design process, through the Parent Advisory Committee
(PAC) representative that was on the park steering committee. Information from the Steering
Committee was shared with the PAC at their meetings that were attended by Administrators from the
Page 3 of 5
school. In addition the final concept plan was shared with the PAC and Administrator prior to the
Public Open House presentation of the plan.
Parks staff contacted the owner of the Sampo Hall property by letter. The owner responded with a
telephone call to staff during which the owner indicated he did not have any current plans for the
property. The owner advised he may consider what potential uses were possible on this Institutional
zoned property, and he may market the property in the future, or would consider worthwhile offers to
purchase if they came forward.
A Park Steering Committee meeting was held on March 8th, 2010 with representatives from the
Community Association invited to attend. The response to the three questions above were discussed
with more of the discussion focused on the long term objectives for improved recreation
opportunities on the school site. The Webster's Corners Community Association asked, could an
area of the park adjacent to the school yard be reserved for any future plan to construct a little
league sized ball field on the school site? The park area adjacent to the school yard would not be
developed with amenities beyond turf, to allow for any overlap of the outfield onto the park. The
Steering Committee members were flexible in looking at this request provided the park concept plan
was not significantly altered from the plan displayed at the Open House in April 2009.
Park staff reviewed the existing school yard to find the most appropriate location for a little league
diamond and to determine the spatial need for a field of this size. The design concept was revised to
accommodate the field overlap by shifting a walking trail west and relocating the position of
proposed tree planting adjacent to the trail. The Steering Committee reviewed this revised plan on
March 23rd, 2010, and is prepared to support the concept plan with the revision showing the
potential for a future ball field overlap.
Recognizing that the concept plan now suggests the potential for a ball diamond to be developed on
the school property, with some further adjustments required to the location of existing amenities to
accommodate this layout, the park concept plan revised to March 16th, 2010 was forwarded to the
School District Administration for their information and comment.
The PAC has reviewed the revised concept plan and were concerned that should the ball field
develop the fence would be removed between the park and school. It was suggested by Parks staff
that an outfield fence for the ball diamond could be integrated with the park boundary fence to
provide a continuous barrier along the park and school boundary, should the field development
proceed in the future.
Park Design Conce t
The park design concept incorporates amenities to be enjoyed by a variety of age groups with less
emphasis on primary school age children who can enjoy the existing school amenities. A preschool
aged play equipment structure and swings, and paved walkways for tricycles is located near the front
of the park site. An open lawn area will provide for informal play opportunities.
A gravel pathway loops through an open meadow and portions of the retained forest on this site.
Fitness stations are proposed to be located along this route to provide an additional recreational
opportunity for pedestrians in the park.
A washroom is proposed to be provided on site, an amenity which is typically not provided on a
neighbourhood park. The need for this is based on the fact that the majority of residents visiting the
park will have travelled a greater distance from their rural residences to their neighbourhood park,
Page 4 of 5
than would a resident living in a higher density neighbourhood. The washroom building would be
similar to washrooms now provided at Alco Park and the Skate Park at Thomas Haney Secondary, in
that running water is not provided and a holding tank is incorporated in the design.
The park design caters to visitors who may have dropped off children at the school and would take
younger siblings to play on the equipment, or choose to take the opportunity to walk and or workout
on the fitness equipment.
The open meadow areas, the retention of the forest and its proximity to a water course tributary of
the Kanaka Creek system will provide an educational opportunity for students from the school and
other visitors.
The concept plan will be considered by the Parks and Leisure Services Commission at their meeting
April 8th, 2010 after preparation of this report for the next Committee of the Whole agenda. Staff will
advise the Committee on April 12th, the outcome of the Commission meeting.
b) Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome is that the concept plan be endorsed and approved to permit development of
detailed drawings and specifications for a construction tender. Construction may begin this summer
for completion in 2010.
c) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
Development of this park is consistent with the business plan and falls within the current Parks
capital plan.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Webster's Corners Park Steering Committee has worked to develop a concept plan that takes
into consideration the desires expressed through three resident surveys and several follow up
meetings. Based on the positive comments received at the public open house for the concept plan,
and the minor change to this concept to accommodate a potential future field improvement on the
school grounds, it is recommended that Maple Ridge Council approve the concept plan and direct
staff to prepare the tender documents.
/41�/
Prepared by: Bruce McLeod, MBCSLA
Manager of Parks and @pen Space
Approved by: Mike Murray,
General Manager,. Co 'ty Development,
Parks and Lei e rvice
Concurrence: J.Lf (Jim) Rule
C ief Administrative Officer
Page 5 of 5
Park entry gate
3M wide gravel path beside forest
Angled Gravel Parking -Split rail feline between parking and path.
18 months to 6 year age group swing set with one bucket seat on
no -barrier accessible resilient surfacing
Circuit Fitness stations spaced along walking path.
Dewdriiey-TrunLR( ... Trash—pt d.7YP - ----- ......----
- .. ... --- Re ble eoo rd..-
- - -- - - - Split Rail Fence 'AnSled Gravel Parbrg PaM Entry Gate f --
.washroom with
\` t underground tank.
i{(/ to I • • Shrubs
Groui
\�= eador� - - Existing School Parking
0-
Chan link 1lenne
11 -Gate to ne�gnecuring � WeDster's Come 4emen a y
Ex r F nce
Existingrow of trees
Laval Con Lawnufthdrainaga
4
5
a
C
school
P Y9 and playground
. ^ is ng a
{
..... ...... ............L..... _...__.... __..... _...
II
Swing sat for to months to 6 year old ago getup with t bucket type seat
- • prinking Fountain _
•
�� _ / C tsting Playground
• m Treo plamtedwitn a treeprete
♦ •
Open Ldwn Open grass area between
yl 1� 'new, and existing day areas-
Play area for 1e months to a year 1.4 ge group i
`— Asphalt pathways /
{
sting Chain Link Fcn _
3m MI,gravel ,all
� � � '
G I- t traii area
t Sr, -de g vet path t ender
through o�u t g
�� Gravel rest area .v Ih benches _ / .� I \ Proposed Baseball Diamorld
J
Woctlen lookout platlorm_
•
56m
'Additional antrance gate.
Ecising vegetation to be retained
Gravel lookout area with benches
N
LEGEND:
C) Existing Vegatation
Proposed Shrubs
ant, Groundcovers
10 Proposed trees
Proposed Lawn
0 Proposed Meadow
Proposed Gravel Paving
Proposed Asphalt Paving
Playground Pad
Proposed Bench
0 Trash Receptacle
® Fitnes Circuit Equipment
`o
Z
2 M.r 1a, 21 Baseber piamond Pavision
Issued ref Ravirx
1 March 19, MI Issuedrur Review
dale. I item:
Revisions:
�uranto Kreuk Lld.
106-I 152 P,ad St
van:uurer RC V89 AX2
f. t W4 ON pq 1a94Ik�weY
lnt+v.dW.lx C3
Protect:
Webster's Corner Park
Drawn by GT
Chardcad by: pc
Date: March 11. 2609
snag' 1;700
Drawing Title:
Proposed Landscape
Treatment
Project No.
09020
sheet No.:
L-1 of 1
MAPLE RIDGE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
Policy on Council and Staff Liaison Roles
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
DATE: 2010 03 26
FILE NO:
ATTN: Committee of the Whole
The attached draft has been prepared in the hope of clarifying the roles and responsibilities of
Council and Staff liaisons to independent organizations as opposed to the role played by Council
members assigned to Municipal Committees and Commissions. It is also intended to provide
guidance to those organizations to whom liaisons have been assigned in terms of their
responsibilities and the reasonable expectations they should have of assigned liaisons.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That Council adopt the policy on Council and Staff liaisons attached to the 2010 03 26 report on this
subject.
DISCUSSION
a) Background Context: There has been some confusion on the part of groups to whom liaisons
have been assigned with respect to the roles and responsibilities of the person assigned to
them as their municipal liaison as well as their own group responsibilities in terms of their
interaction with liaisons. There has also been some confusion about conflict of interest
related to the various roles Council members play, whether that of liaison to an independent
group or being a member of a Municipal Committee or Board of Directors for an agency
delivering services on behalf of many Municipalities. The intent of the policy is to provide
guidance to Council and Staff liaisons and to the groups with whom they interact.. Much of
this is understood but has not been documented. Council members and staff working in
these roles have requested that some level of documentation be prepared.
b) Desired Outcome(s): The desired outcome is clarity with respect to what is expected of
municipal liaisons to independent organizations and what is expected of those organizations.
c) Strategic Alignment: Having strong working relationships with many organizations is part of
the Municipality's strategic approach to delivering services. Ensuring those relationships are
maintained is part of ensuring continued strength in joint service delivery.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The hope is that having clarity with respect to expectations
will avoid any conflict or tension which might otherwise occur.
1152
CONCLUSIONS:
Staff have been asked to prepare a policy for discussion by Council which will result in a policy which
can be provided to groups to whom municipal staff or Council liaisons have been assigned. The
attached draft reflects the changes suggested by Council to the first draft and is offered to Council
for final review and consideration. i
red by: Mike Murray
General Manager C m unity evelopment, Parks and Recreation
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
MWM j
MAPLE RIDGE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
Title: Council and Staff Liaison Roles
Authority: ® Legislative ❑ Operational
Approval: ® Council
Policy Statement:
❑ CMT
❑ General Manager
POLICY MANUAL
Policy No:
Supersedes: New
Effective Date:
Review Date: 2011
Liaison Role
Municipal Council will assign members of Council and/or Municipal Management will assign staff
members to the role of municipal liaison to various community organizations where the
relationship between the Municipality and the organization is deemed critical to achieving the
Municipality's mandate and goals. The role of liaison is intended to facilitate excellent and
ongoing communication on matters of mutual interest. The intent of doing so is to ensure a
continuing dialogue on how the Municipality and organization can work together to better meet
the community needs they each hope to address.
Council Liaisons
Council members will only be assigned a liaison role where the liaison function is felt to be
critical to achieving the Municipality's mandate and where ongoing communication and
knowledge gained from that communication and shared with the rest of Council by the liaison
would assist Council as a whole in considering matters of common interest with the organization
with whom they have a liaison function.
Staff Liaisons
A staff liaison may be more appropriately assigned where the organization to which they are
assigned holds a fee for service contract with the municipality for the delivery of a Municipal
service to citizens. While facilitating excellent on going communication is certainly part of a staff
liaison role, monitoring performance to ensure delivery of agreed upon services is also part of
the staff liaison function. Providing expert advice on effective organizational operations can also
be part of the staff liaison function where that expertise may not exist within the organization
itself.
Page 1 of 6 Policy
Prioritizing requests for a Municipal liaison
There may be requests for a Council or staff liaison from community organizations which cannot be
accepted in part because the time available simply does not permit such assignments to every
group wishing a liaison. Where priorities need to be set for assigning liaisons a higher priority will
be given to those organizations delivering services on behalf of the Municipality and, secondly, to
those organizations or networks which are not represented already through a Municipal committee
or Commission and which represent a network of groups and agencies which are critical to
achieving community needs for which the Municipality also has some responsibility. For example
the Municipality would assign a liaison to the Arts Council as well as a staff liaison because it holds
a significant contract with the Municipality but may not assign a liaison to a minor sport
organization because the Parks and Leisure Services Commission has been formed to consider all
of the needs of the sports community.
Assigning Council Liaisons
There is some rationale for considering the availability of various Council members when choosing
which member should be assigned to which group. Those with more flexible schedules may be
more available for liaison responsibilities than others. A Council member's personal interests and
expertise should also be considered in terms of making assignments along with their involvement
in a particular subject (i.e. they may be involved with a group which is in the middle of an important
initiative and, therefore, under these circumstances, a change in liaison may not be advisable).
Another consideration may be the notion of broadening every Council member's knowledge by
rotating their responsibilities where that is felt to be beneficial. The benefit of such rotations to the
groups with whom Council members liaise is that more members of Council become familiar with
the organization and the issues it is an advocate for.
Since there are many factors involved in determining such assignments it is not felt appropriate to
prescribe a process or a maximum term for service as a Council liaison. The only guidance to be
offered by this policy statement would be to suggest all of the above be considered along with the
basic principle that Council members should share liaison responsibilities as equitably as possible.
Purpose:
The purpose of this policy is to clarify the roles and responsibilities of Council and Staff liaisons
to independent organizations. It is also intended to provide guidance to those organizations to
whom liaisons have been assigned in terms of their responsibilities and the reasonable
expectations they should have of assigned liaisons.
Definitions:
"Liaison" refers to a position assigned to a Council or Staff member where the primary objective
is to maintain good communication and relationships between an outside, independently
constituted organization and the District of Maple Ridge.
Page 2 of 6 Policy
Key Areas of Responsibility
Action to Take
Responsibilities of Organizations to whom Council and staff
liaisons are assigned
Such groups should:
FI
Ensure assigned Council members and staff members are
provided with sufficient advance notice of meetings and
agendas, given their busy schedules. Establishing a regular
meeting schedule is helpful, however, sending agendas out in
advance is equally important since it will assist the Council or
staff member in determining if their attendance and input
would be helpful to the group and to Council. Sending
agendas out at least four days in advance for regularly
scheduled meetings is a minimum standard. Significantly
greater advance notice and agenda distribution is required for
special meetings outside the regular meeting schedule.
Occasionally, despite regularly scheduled meetings, Council
members in particular must choose between meetings which
have been scheduled and other important community events
and meetings which come up from time to time. Having an
agenda in advance is an important tool in helping a Council
liaison to make that determination and to be effective in their
role.
b. Provide advance notice for the Council or staff member to
address a particular topic of interest to the group at an
upcoming meeting. While not always possible advance notice
of a particular question can be very helpful in ensuring the
liaison has time to complete an appropriate level of
investigation or research if the question happens to be on a
subject with which they are not familiar.
c. Be appropriately constituted, be in good standing with the
Registrar of Societies and function in accordance with the
guidelines which typically govern well functioning Societies.
Such guidelines include sending agendas out in advance,
maintaining minutes, managing meetings in accordance with
appropriate rules of order, holding regular elections,
maintaining proper financial records, etc.
Is
Welcome Council and staff liaisons to attend every meeting
they choose to attend (save and except for meetings which
are exclusive to the Board members only which deal with
personnel or legal matters and other confidential matters
such as negotiations with the municipality).
i
Responsibility
Community Organization
Chair or Representative
Community Organization
Chair or Representative
Community Organization
Chair or Representative
Community Organization
Chair or Representative
Page 3 of 6 Policy
e. Respect a Council liaison's time by moving those items which
the liaison may need to address to as early a place in the
agenda as possible and not expect the liaison to stay beyond
dealing with that subject, unless the liaison chooses to stay
(not to participate in the Board's further discussions but to
learn more about the organization and what is important to
the Board to further the relationship). The staff liaison in
particular may wish to stay in order to fulfill their responsibility
of monitoring the group's performance of contracted services.
f. Appreciate a Council liaison should not be expected to attend
every meeting of the organization. Of course a liaison should
attend on a reasonably regular basis in order to fulfill the
function as best as he or she can. However, attending every
meeting is, in all probability, unrealistic given the number of
liaison and committee responsibilities each Council member is
assigned on top of their formal Council responsibilities. In
addition, some Council members have career and
professional responsibilities beyond their Council role. In some
cases where it is felt that very regular representation from
Council is required then an alternate may also be appointed.
A staff liaison's attendance will likely be more consistent given
the limitation on the number of groups for whom they have a
liaison responsibility.
g. Not expect a liaison to participate in group discussions as if
they are just another member of the Board of Directors. The
organization should definitely not give the staff or Council
liaison a vote. Doing so may put the Council liaison in a
conflict position with respect to matters which come before
Council having to do with the group. A Council member cannot
vote at Council on matters related to another organization with
whom they have a fiduciary responsibility (voting at a Board
meeting constitutes acceptance of such responsibility) and
must not participate in any debates on such matters at
Council. In fact they are required to declare the conflict and
leave the meeting room when such conflicts occur while the
matter in question is being discussed by theother members of
Council.
Responsibilities of Council and Staff Liaisons
Assigned Council and staff liaisons should:
a. Attend as many of the organization's meetings and functions
as necessary to achieve the desired end result of good
communications and a positive working relationship with the
group. Recognizing regular monthly attendance may not be
possible the Council liaison should discuss their intention to
attend on whatever schedule makes sense with the group
Community Organization
Chair or Representative
Community Organization
Chair or Representative
Community Organization
Chair or Representative
Council Liaison
Council Alternate Liaison
Staff Liaison
Page 4 of 6 Policy
President at the outset of their assignment, to ensure clarity
and avoid higher than can be delivered expectations. Having a
staff liaison in attendance may provide a greater sense by
Council members who are assigned liaison responsibility that
the Municipality's interests are being represented to some
degree and may permit less frequent attendance by a Council
liaison. If a staff and Council liaison have both been assigned
to a group each should bring the other up to date on those
matters of mutual interest to both the municipality and the
organization which were discussed at a meeting their
counterpart was unable to attend.
b. Let the organization's President or Secretary know when they
are unable to attend a meeting at which they might otherwise
be expected, and, if an alternate has been appointed, notify
the alternate Council representative they will be unable to
attend and determine if the alternate is available to cover the
meeting. If they are available forwarding the agenda to the
alternate is also required.
c. Not vote and avoid participating in group debates as if they
were a member of the organization's Board of Directors. (see
"g" above)
d. Not make commitments on behalf of the Municipality which
are not already covered by policy or a previously approved
standard of service. Of course a Council liaison should be
prepared to look into any request, passing that along to the
appropriate senior staff member to investigate. The staff
member's obligation is to ensure the Council liaison is
informed as to the outcome and response to the request.
Councif Committee and Commission Roles and Responsibilities
(referenced here only to clarify the difference between liaison and
committee roles and responsibilities)
Council members will also be assigned to a variety of Municipally
established committees and commissions whose role is to
advance the Municipality's mandate in their various areas of
responsibility.
The role of a member of Council on such committees is very
different than that of liaison to an independent organization.
To be more specific Council members who are assigned to such
groups are expected to participate fully in the discussion and
debate on subjects before such committees and are generally
expected to vote along with the other appointed members of the
committee or commission. All such groups are duly constituted by
bylaws of the Municipality to carry out the Municipality's business.
In some cases they are advisory and in others they have been
Council Liaison
Council Alternate Liaison
Staff Liaison
Council Liaison
Council Alternate Liaison
Staff Liaison
Council Liaison
Council Alternate Liaison
Staff Liaison
Page 5 of 6 Policy
delegated the authority to act independently within parameters
established by Council and allowed by the Community Charter and
Local Government Act.
In all cases the Council members assigned to these groups are
expected to bring a Council perspective to the table.
The legal opinions we have available to us indicate there is no
conflict of interest for a Council member who participates in
debates and discussions and votes on matters at a municipal
committee or commission meeting and then considers and votes
on a recommendation from the committee or commission at
Council. This is because the committee or commission is a child of
the Municipal Government and the business being conducted is
therefore being carried out by the Municipality for the Municipality
and not by an independently constituted organization.
Role of Council members annointed by Council to le�islativelY
constituted Boards involving organizations made up of several
Municipalities collaborating on the delivery of services
referenced here only to clarity the difference between liaison
and regional Board appointee responsibilities)
Members of Council can be appointed by Council or by the Mayor
to represent the Municipality on Boards of Directors of agencies
which have been duly constituted to deliver services on behalf of
several Municipalities acting together. Examples of this include
the Fraser Valley Regional Library or the Metro Vancouver
Regional District. In such cases the appointed member
participates fully on the Board to which they have been appointed
and are generally tasked with the obligation to vote as they
personally feel is appropriate on matters that come before that
Board. That is because it is assumed that, due to their
involvement, the Council member sitting at the Board table has a
greater appreciation for the broad responsibility of the Board than
other Councilors not on the Board whose context is only the
services provided locally. It is understood that a Council cannot
compel a member representing the municipality on this type
Board to vote in accordance with Council's wishes expressed by a
resolution of Council. With that said most of the Council members
who serve as Board representatives to regional bodies do consult
with the rest of Council to obtain their views before a particularly
challenging subject is voted upon at a regional Board level.
We are advised by the District's legal advisors that despite the
independence described above there is no conflict for a Council
member who is appointed to sit on such a Board who then
participates in debates and discussions at the Council table
about the municipality's continuing involvement in such a
regional function or any other debate related to Council's
involvement with the regional body involved.
Page 6 of 6 Policy
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE:
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN:
Parks & Leisure Services Fees and Charges
2010-March-12
[6KOJA
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.
a) As a result of the 2010 admission and rental rate review for Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks and
Leisure facilities; staff recommend an increase of 5 % to approximately half the current rental rates that
fall below current market rates (Arena Ice, Parks Shelters, Indoor Pool, Greg Moore Youth Centre, Halls,
Meeting Rooms and Sports Fields), with the remaining facility and admission rates increasing by the
2009 average Consumer Price Index for Vancouver (CPI = 0.7%). The exceptions will be a 10% increase
to meetings rooms and kitchen facilities, noting that rental rates for these facilities are considerably
below average for similar facilities in other communities. A policy of applying the CPI minimum increase
was adopted by the Parks and Leisure Services Commission in 2008, directing staff to initiate a
"minimal annual increase to all admission and facility rental fees regardless of whether they are already
at or above market rates".
b) It should be noted that effective July 1, 2010 the new HST regulations come into affect. This will mean
an additional 7% increase to all existing 2010 fees. In past years our fee schedules have been
approved inclusive of GST. We have reformatted the Fees and Charges Schedules that attach to the
By-laws to identify tax rates separate from the fees.
c) Once the Fee's and Charges Bylaw is endorsed by both Councils (June 2010), staff will immediately
notify user groups and implement the changes effective January 1st, 2011.
More specifically:
2011 Admission Rates
Public Skating
Pitt M. Family Recreation Centre
Leisure Centre
Outdoor Pool
2011 Rental Rates
* Arena Ice rental
Arena Dry Floor
Gymnasium/Multipurpose Room
Indoor Pool
Categories
All
All
All
All
Categories
All
All
All
All
Increase
5%
5%
CPI
5%
Increase
5%
CPI
CPI
5%
Reason
Market average
Market average
Market average
Market average
Reason
Market average
Market average
Market average
Market average
Notes
Below market
Below market
Equal to market
Below market
Notes
Below market
Equal to market
Equal to market
Below market
1153
Outdoor Pool
All
5%
Market average
Fairgrounds
All
CPI
Market average
Park Shelter
All
5%
Market average
Greg Moore Youth Centre
All
5%
Market average
Greg Moore Active Floor
All
CPI
Market average
Meeting Rooms
All
10%
Market average
Heritage Hall
All
5%
Market average
Hammond Hall
All
CPI
Market average
Kitchen
All
10%
Market average
Special Event Trailer
All
CPI
Sports Fields
"A"
CPI
Market average
Sports Fields
"B & C"
5%
Market average
Below market
Equal to market
Below market
Below market
Equal to market
Below market
Below market
Equal to market
Below market
Equal to market
Below market
*Please note - Arena rental rates are for the allocation of time controlled by the Commission.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees Amending Bylaw No. 6727-2010 be given first, second
and third readings.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The last fees and charges review of indoor facility rental rates and admissions took place in the
spring of 2009 and the fee changes approved at that time were implemented Jan 1, 2010.
In January 2010, staff reviewed facility rental and admissions data for Lower Mainland recreation
facilities, including but not limited to; Port Coquitlam, Coquitlam, Langley, Mission, Abbotsford,
Burnaby, Port Moody and Vancouver to determine current market rental rates. Included with this
report is a summary of research showing the average market rate per facility, compared to current
Commission rates and the variance between the two - See Attachment #1.
Sports Fields had not previously been part of the regular fees and charges review, but were
included in the 2011 review. Staff is recommending that the fees and charges policy be
updated prior to the next rate review, as the current policy is out of date particularly in relation
to field allocations.
b) Desired Outcome:
To regularly review facility rental and admission fees and maintain a balance between rates that
are affordable to local user groups, and comparable to the current market to assist in off -setting
operating costs.
c) Strategic Alignment: Financial Management
Provide high quality municipal services to our citizens and customers in a cost effective and
efficient manner.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The group that will see the largest financial impact is Ridge Meadows Minor Hockey as they rent
the largest number of hours in the most expensive facility; the impact for this group will be
approximately $5,250 for one year plus the increased HST on the total ice bill. However, a
portion of this will be offset by the Commission providing more subsidized ice time to minor
sports groups. Although we have not increased most fees more than 5% we are recommending
a 10% increase to meeting rooms and kitchens which have fallen below market value. The
impact of a 10% increase would be approximately $25 per year for regular monthly user groups
of meeting rooms. In the past kitchen rental rate fees were a flat rate, in 2010 staff applied the
fees and charges formula which will significantly reduce the cost for non-profit groups to access
kitchens in recreation facilities.
Commission should also be aware that any increase will have a significant impact on community
groups who have been reliant on grant funding in the past.
To mitigate the impact on customers, our goal is to monitor and adjust fees regularly, and to
provide customers with as much notice as possible when rates change. In this case,
recommended rate increases for admission and rental rates would take effect January 1, 2011,
allowing community groups' time to adjust their registration fees and plan accordingly. If
approved by Commission and both Councils, groups will be notified of the increases in June
2010.
The Commission and Councils have also adopted policies to provide those with limited financial
means access to facilities and programs at little or no cost. The Commission also waives rental
fees equivalent to registration fees waived by renters to citizens who need assistance to
participate.
e) Interdepartmental Implications: None.
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
If adopted, these rate changes would increase facility rental revenue by approximately $22,000
and admission fee revenue by approximately $9,000 in 2011, this revenue off -sets facility
operating costs.
g) Policy Implications: This recommendation follows the existing fees and charges policy; however
we are recommending this policy be updated prior to the 2012 review.
h) Alternatives:
Commission could suggest additional changes based on their interpretation of the attached data.
CONCLUSIONS:
If the recommendation in this report is approved, approximately half the rates will increase by 5%
and the remaining half will increase by CPI, which is low at 0.7%. The exceptions will be a 10%
increase to meetings rooms and kitchen facilities. Users will also be impacted by the implementation
of HST which will result in an additional 7% increase.
Prepared by: Diane Chamberlain, Administrative Coordinator Parks and Recreation
Rpp'roved; b : Kelly Swift, Director of Recreation
Approved by. Mi Il rray, Geral Manager
C rtty Development Parks Recreation
Approved by: Paul Gill, General ME'
Corporate and Finan
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim Rule I
Chief Administrative Officer
de
ADMISSIONS
Maple Ridge Leisure
Admissions
Recommendation
CPI Increase
Centre
AVERAGE
Maple
VARIANCE
MR %
Ridge
of AVG
Children
$ 2.63
$ 2.67
0.04
102%
Youth
$ 3.58
$ 3.43
- 0.15
96%
Senior
$ 3.60
1 $ 3.43
- 0.17
95%
Adult
$ 5.04
$ 5.24
0.20
104%
Family
$ 10.38
$ 9.19
1.19
89%
Pitt Meadows Family
Recreation Centre Ac
Recommendation
5% Increase
Outdoor Pool Admis
Recommendation
5% Increase
Arena Admissions
Recommendation
5% Increase
]missions
AVERAGE
Pitt
VARIANCE
PM %
Meadows
of AVG
Children
$ 2.70
$ 2.15
- 0.55
80%
Youth
$ 3.69
$ 2.76
- 0.93
75%
Senior
$ 3.69
$ 2.76
0.93
75%
Adult
$ 4.97
$ 4.33
- 0.64
87%
Family
$ 10.95
$ 8.09
2.86
74%
Slons AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MRIPM %
of AVG
Children $ 2.02 $ 1.38 - 0.64 68%
Youth $ 2.67 $ 2.05 - 0.62 77%
Senior $ 2.81 $ 2.05 - 0.76 73%
Adult $ 3.79 $ 2.62 - 1.17 699/.
Family $ 7.48 $ 5.24 - 2.24 70%
AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR/PM %
of AVG
Children $ 2.42 $ 2.15 - 0.27 89%
Youth $ 3.18 $ 2.62 - 0.56 82%
Senior $ 3.21 $ 2.62 - 0.59 82%
Adult $ 4.34 $ 3.71 - 0.63 85%
Family $ 8.71 $ 6.24 - 2.47 72%
Parent & Tot $ 3.93 $ 3.10 - 0.83 79%
AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR/PM %
of AVG
Children $ 2.42 $ 2.15 - 0.27 89%
Youth $ 3.18 $ 2.62 - 0.56 82%
Senior $ 3.21 $ 2.62 - 0.59 82%
Adult $ 4.34 $ 3.71 - 0.63 85%
Family $ 8.71 $ 6.24 - 2.47 72%
Parent & Tot $ 3.93 $ 3.10 - 0.83 79%
RENTALS
Arena & Dry Floor R
ICE
Recommendation
5% Increase
DRY FLOOR
Recommendation
CPI Increase
Gymnasium Rentals
Recommendation
CPI Increase
entals AVERAGE MR VARIANCE MR/PM %
& of AVG
ICE PM
Youth Non Pr $ 97.49 $ 86.83 10.66 89%
Adult Non-prq $ 203.48 $ 112.98 - 90.50 56%
Private Grou $ 258.75 $ 197.88 - 60.87 76%
DRY FLOOR
Youth Non Pr $ 35.80 $ 34.94 - 0.86 98%
Adult Non Pr $ 74.48 $ 55.32 - 19.16 74%
Private Grou $ 93.55 $ 65.32 - 28.23 70%
AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR/PM %
of AVG
Youth Non-P $ 36.54 $ 38.86 2.32 106%
Adult Non -Pr $ 63.29 $ 59.68 - 3.61 94%
Private $ 129.27 $ 69.68 - 59.59 54%
Commercial $ 145.73 $ 76.65 - 69.08 53%
Greg Moore Youth Centre (Active Space) rates set by Dry Floor Rentals
Multipurpose Rooms Rentals set by 1/4 Gymnasium rentals
Park Shelter Rentals
Recommendation Non -Profit,
5% Increase
Indoor Pool Rentals
Recommendation
5% Increase
Large Hall (200-300)
Recommendation
5% Increase
AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR %
of AVG
$ 59.67 $ 48.76 - 10.91 82%
per event per event
Der Lane AVERAGE MR VARIANCE MR/PM %
of A VG
Youth Non $ 7.36 $ 4.60 - 2.76 63%
Adult Non $ 14.64 $ 9.99 - 4.65 68%
Private $ 18.21 $ 11.13 - 7.08 61%
AVERAGE I MR/PM I VARIANCE MR %
Heritage Upper of AVG
Youth Non -Pr $ 26.02 $ 22.91 3.11 88%
Adult Non -Pr $ 33.49 $ 41.95 - 8.46 125%
Private $ 93.97 $ 51.95 42.02 55%
Private
$ 95.17 $ 57.15 38.02 60%
Medium Hall (100-15(
Recommendation
No Increase or
CPI Increase
)) AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR %
Hammond of AVG
100-120
Youth Non -Pr $ 11.80 $ 15.78 3.98 134%
Adult Non-Prc $ 19.96 $ 34.03 - 14.07 170%
Private $ 56.50 $ 44.03 12.47 78%
Commercial $ 73.08 $ 48.44 24.64 66%
AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR/PM %
of AVG
Youth Non-P $ 36.54 $ 38.86 2.32 106%
Adult Non -Pr $ 63.29 $ 59.68 - 3.61 94%
Private $ 129.27 $ 69.68 - 59.59 54%
Commercial $ 145.73 $ 76.65 - 69.08 53%
Greg Moore Youth Centre (Active Space) rates set by Dry Floor Rentals
Multipurpose Rooms Rentals set by 1/4 Gymnasium rentals
Park Shelter Rentals
Recommendation Non -Profit,
5% Increase
Indoor Pool Rentals
Recommendation
5% Increase
Large Hall (200-300)
Recommendation
5% Increase
AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR %
of AVG
$ 59.67 $ 48.76 - 10.91 82%
per event per event
Der Lane AVERAGE MR VARIANCE MR/PM %
of A VG
Youth Non $ 7.36 $ 4.60 - 2.76 63%
Adult Non $ 14.64 $ 9.99 - 4.65 68%
Private $ 18.21 $ 11.13 - 7.08 61%
AVERAGE I MR/PM I VARIANCE MR %
Heritage Upper of AVG
Youth Non -Pr $ 26.02 $ 22.91 3.11 88%
Adult Non -Pr $ 33.49 $ 41.95 - 8.46 125%
Private $ 93.97 $ 51.95 42.02 55%
Private
$ 95.17 $ 57.15 38.02 60%
Medium Hall (100-15(
Recommendation
No Increase or
CPI Increase
)) AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR %
Hammond of AVG
100-120
Youth Non -Pr $ 11.80 $ 15.78 3.98 134%
Adult Non-Prc $ 19.96 $ 34.03 - 14.07 170%
Private $ 56.50 $ 44.03 12.47 78%
Commercial $ 73.08 $ 48.44 24.64 66%
Greg Moore Youth Centre (Active Space) rates set by Dry Floor Rentals
Multipurpose Rooms Rentals set by 1/4 Gymnasium rentals
Park Shelter Rentals
Recommendation Non -Profit,
5% Increase
Indoor Pool Rentals
Recommendation
5% Increase
Large Hall (200-300)
Recommendation
5% Increase
AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR %
of AVG
$ 59.67 $ 48.76 - 10.91 82%
per event per event
Der Lane AVERAGE MR VARIANCE MR/PM %
of A VG
Youth Non $ 7.36 $ 4.60 - 2.76 63%
Adult Non $ 14.64 $ 9.99 - 4.65 68%
Private $ 18.21 $ 11.13 - 7.08 61%
AVERAGE I MR/PM I VARIANCE MR %
Heritage Upper of AVG
Youth Non -Pr $ 26.02 $ 22.91 3.11 88%
Adult Non -Pr $ 33.49 $ 41.95 - 8.46 125%
Private $ 93.97 $ 51.95 42.02 55%
Private
$ 95.17 $ 57.15 38.02 60%
Medium Hall (100-15(
Recommendation
No Increase or
CPI Increase
)) AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR %
Hammond of AVG
100-120
Youth Non -Pr $ 11.80 $ 15.78 3.98 134%
Adult Non-Prc $ 19.96 $ 34.03 - 14.07 170%
Private $ 56.50 $ 44.03 12.47 78%
Commercial $ 73.08 $ 48.44 24.64 66%
Der Lane AVERAGE MR VARIANCE MR/PM %
of A VG
Youth Non $ 7.36 $ 4.60 - 2.76 63%
Adult Non $ 14.64 $ 9.99 - 4.65 68%
Private $ 18.21 $ 11.13 - 7.08 61%
AVERAGE I MR/PM I VARIANCE MR %
Heritage Upper of AVG
Youth Non -Pr $ 26.02 $ 22.91 3.11 88%
Adult Non -Pr $ 33.49 $ 41.95 - 8.46 125%
Private $ 93.97 $ 51.95 42.02 55%
Private
$ 95.17 $ 57.15 38.02 60%
Medium Hall (100-15(
Recommendation
No Increase or
CPI Increase
)) AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR %
Hammond of AVG
100-120
Youth Non -Pr $ 11.80 $ 15.78 3.98 134%
Adult Non-Prc $ 19.96 $ 34.03 - 14.07 170%
Private $ 56.50 $ 44.03 12.47 78%
Commercial $ 73.08 $ 48.44 24.64 66%
AVERAGE I MR/PM I VARIANCE MR %
Heritage Upper of AVG
Youth Non -Pr $ 26.02 $ 22.91 3.11 88%
Adult Non -Pr $ 33.49 $ 41.95 - 8.46 125%
Private $ 93.97 $ 51.95 42.02 55%
Private
$ 95.17 $ 57.15 38.02 60%
Medium Hall (100-15(
Recommendation
No Increase or
CPI Increase
)) AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR %
Hammond of AVG
100-120
Youth Non -Pr $ 11.80 $ 15.78 3.98 134%
Adult Non-Prc $ 19.96 $ 34.03 - 14.07 170%
Private $ 56.50 $ 44.03 12.47 78%
Commercial $ 73.08 $ 48.44 24.64 66%
Medium Hall (100-15(
Recommendation
No Increase or
CPI Increase
)) AVERAGE MR/PM VARIANCE MR %
Hammond of AVG
100-120
Youth Non -Pr $ 11.80 $ 15.78 3.98 134%
Adult Non-Prc $ 19.96 $ 34.03 - 14.07 170%
Private $ 56.50 $ 44.03 12.47 78%
Commercial $ 73.08 $ 48.44 24.64 66%
Large Meeting Room
Recommendation
10% Increase
Medium Meeting roo
Recommendation
10% Increase
(80.100)
AVERAGE
MR/PM
VARIANCE
MR %
Fraser Room
of AVG
Youth Non -Pr
$ 15.25
$ -
15.25
0%
Adult Non-Pri
$ 26.00
$ 4.25
21.75
16%
Private
$ 51.46
$ 14.25
37.21
28%
Commercial
$ 57.29
$ 15.68
41.61
27%
Small Meeting Room
Recommendation
10% Increase
m (40)
AVERAGE
MR/PM
VARIANCE
MR %
Art Workshop
of AVG
60
Youth Non -Pr
$ 7.41
$ -
7.41
0%
Adult Non-Prc
$ 12.84
$ -
12.84
0%
Private
$ 20.64
$ 8.23
12.41
40%
Commercial
$ 20.14
$ 9.05
11.09
45%
(15)
AVERAGE I MR/PM I VARIANCE
MR %
Alouette Room
of AVG
Youth Non -Pr
$ 7.82
$ -
7.82
0%
Adult Non -Pr
$ 14.00
$ -
14.00
0%
Private
$ 19.86
$ 9.92
9.94
50%
Commercial
$ 21.07
$ 10.91
10.16
52%
Kitchen (Hourly & Pe
Recommendation
10% Increase
"A" Level Field
Recommendation
CPI Increase
"B" Level Field
Recommendation
5% Increase
r Day
AVERAGE
MR/PM
VARIANCE
MR %
ofAVG
YSNP Per H
$8.35
8.35
0%
ANP Per Hou
$10.45
10.45
0%
Private/Comn
$14.83
14.83
0%
YSNP Per Da
$66.80
66.80
0%
ANP Per Day
$83.60
83.60
0%
Private/Comn
$118.64
$ 60.41
58.23
51%
AVERAGE
MR/PM
VARIANCE
MR %
ofAVG
Youth Non -Pr
$ 3.35
$ -
3.35
0%
Adult Non -Pr
$ 11.81
$ 11.40
0.41
97%
Private
$ 17.98
$ 21.40
- 3.42
119%
Commercial
$ 23.23
$ 23.54
- 0.31
101 %
AVERAGE
MR/PM
VARIANCE
MR %
ofAVG
Youth Non -Pr
$ 2.33
$ -
2.33
0%
Adult Non-Prc
$ 8.48
$ 5.29
3.19
62%
Private
$ 14.77
$ 15.29
- 0.52
104%
Commercial
1 $ 17.78
i $ 16.82
0.96
95%
"C" Level Field
Recommendation
5% Increase
Artificial Turf
AVERAGE
MR/PM
VARIANCE
MR %
of AVG
Youth Non -Pr
$ 1.00
$
1.00
0%
Adult Non-Prc
$ 4.98
$
4.98
0%
Private
$ 8.33
$ 5.10
3.23
61 %
Commercial
1 $ 6.13
$ 5.61
0.52
92%
AVERAGE
MR/PM
VARIANCE
MR %
Hourly
of AVG
Youth Non -Pr
$ 11.76
$10/head/field/yr
Adult Non-Prc
$ 30.68
$20/head/field/yr
Private
$ 51.17
51.17
0%
Commercial
$ 58.65
58.65
0%
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 6727-2010
A Bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988 as amended.
WHEREAS the Council may by bylaw establish and regulate the fixing of fees for admissions and/or
use of sports, recreation and community use facilities;
AND WHEREAS, the Council has imposed fees and now wishes to amend those fees;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees Amending Bylaw No. 6727-
2010".
2. That Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees By-law No. 4117 - 1988 as amended, be further
amended by deleting Schedules "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "J", "K", "L" and "M" in
their entirety and replacing with Schedule "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "J", "K",
and "M" as attached hereto.
3. This Bylaw shall come into force and effect as of January 1, 2011 for Schedules "A", "B", "C",
"D" "E" "F" "G" "H" "J" "K" "L" and "M„
READ a first time the day of 2010.
READ a second time the day of 2010.
READ a third time the day of 2010.
ADOPTED this day of 2010.
PRESIDING MEMBER
CORPORATE OFFICER
Attachments: Schedules "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", T", "G", "H", "J", "K", "U and "M".
6727-2010
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988
SCHEDULE "A"
Arenas
Effective January 1, 2011
taxes extra
Ice
Ice
Ice
Dry Floor
Planet Ice
Prime
Non -Prime
Early Bird
Mtg Room
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial Use
$129.13
$103.30
$65.78
$10.91
Fundraising
$115.88
$90.05
$52.53
$5.46
Special Event
$109.26
$83.43
$83.43
$45.91
$2.73
Regular Use
$92.37
$69.12
$69.12
$35.35
$0.00
Adult Non Profit
Commercial Use
$129.13
$103.30
$65.78
$10.91
Fundraising
$129.13
$103.30
$65.78
$10.91
Special Event
$124.13
$98.30
$98.30
$60.78
$5.46
Regular Use
$119.13
$93.30
$93.30
$55.78
$0.00
Local, Private or Political
Groups
Fundraising
$193.16
$156.13
$98.67
$16.37
Special Event
$185.84
$148.85
$82.23
$13.64
Regular Use
$197.88
$143.72
$65.78
$10.91
Local Commercial
Fundraising
$305.27
$235.64
$105.25
$17.46
Special Event
$254.24
$203.88
$88.80
$14.73
Regular Use
$209.87
$161.99
$72.36
$12.00
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising
$307.07
$245.66
$111.83
$18.55
Special Event
$263.21
$210.56
$95.38
$15.82
Regular Use
$215.88
$172.70
$78.94
$13.09
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988
SCHEDULE "B"
6727-2010
Fairgrounds
Effective January 1, 2011
taxes extra
Commercial or
Beef Stage
Grounds &
Exhibition
Barn
Showrings
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial Use
$19.47
$29.19
$4.86
$17.04
Fundraising
$9.74
$15.94
$2.43
$8.52
Special Event
$4.87
$9.32
$1.22
$4.26
Regular Use
$0.00
$2.42
$0.00
$0.00
Adult Non Profit
Commercial Use
$19.47
$29.19
$4.86
$17.04
Fundraising
$19.47
$29.19
$4.86
$17.04
Special Event
$14.47
$24.19
$2.43
$12.04
Regular Use
$9.47
$19.19
$0.00
$7.04
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising
$29.21
$43.79
$7.29
$25.56
Special Event
$24.34
$36.49
$6.08
$21.30
Regular Use
$19.47
$29.19
$4.86
$17.04
Local Commercial
Fundraising
$31.15
$46.70
$7.78
$2 26
Special Event
$26.28
$39.41
$6.56
$23..00
Regular Use
$21.42
$32.11
$5.35
$18.74
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising
$33.10
$49.62
$8.26
$28.97
Special Event
$28.23
$42.33
$7.05
$24.71
Regular Use
$23.36
$35.03
$5.83
$20.45
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988
SCHEDULE "C"
6727-2010
Maple Ridge Leisure Centre Pool Rates
Effective January 1, 2011
taxes extra
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial Use
Fundraising
Special Event
Regular Use
Adult Non Profit
Commercial Use
Fundraising
Special Event
Regular Use
Local, Private or Political
Groups
Fundraising
Special Event
Regular Use
Local Commercial
Fundraising
Special Event
Regular Use
Leisure Pool/Competition
Pool
Per Lane
$11.69
$8.53
$6.93
$4.83
$11.69
$11.69
$11.45
$10.49
$17.51
$14.60
$11.69
$18.70
$15.78
$12.83
Hammond Pool
Full Pool
$52.83
$36.56
$28.39
$18.25
$52.83
$52.83
$46.68
$40.54
$79.23
$66.03
$52.83
$84.53
$71.32
$58.11
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising $19.85 $89.81
Special Event $16.94 $76.60
Regular Use $14.02 $63.39
6727-2010
taxes extra
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988
SCHEDULE T"
Maple Ridge Leisure Centre
Effective January 1, 2011
Full Gym Half Gym 1/4 Gym (Multi-P)
Cap.1000 Cap.500 Cap.80
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial Use $70.17 $35.09 $17.54
Fundraising $56.92 $28.46 $14.23
Special Event $50.30 $25.15 $12.58
Regular Use $39.30 $19.65 $9.83
Adult Non Profit
Commercial Use
Fundraising
Special Event
Regular Use
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising
Special Event
Regular Use
Local Commercial
Fundraising
Special Event
Regular Use
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising
Special Event
Regular Use
Preschool
Cap. 40
$9.10
$4.55
$2.28
$0.00
$69.68
$34.84
$17.42
$9.10
$69.68
$34.84
$17.42
$9.10
$64.68
$32.34
$16.17
$4.55
$59.68
$29.84
$14.92
$0.00
$105.26
$52.63
$26.31
$13.65
$87.71
$43.86
$21.93
$11.38
$70.17
$35.09
$17.54
$9.10
$112.27
$56.14
$28.07
$14.56
$94.73
$47.36
$23.68
$12.29
$77.19
$38.59
$19.30
$10.01
$119.29
$59.64
$29.82
$15.47
$101.75
$50.87
$25.44
$13.20
$84.20
$42.10
$21.05
$10.92
6727-2010
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988
SCHEDULE T"
Maple Ridge Library Meeting Rooms
Effective January 1, 2011
taxes extra Alouette Room Fraser Room
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial Use
$10.91
$15.68
Fundraising
$5.46
$7.84
Special Event
$2.73
$3.92
Regular Use
$0.00
$0.00
Adult Non Profit
Commercial Use
$10.91
$15.68
Fundraising
$10.91
$15.68
Special Event
$5.46
$10.68
Regular Use
$0.00
$5.68
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising
$16.37
$23.52
Special Event
$13.64
$19.60
Regular Use
$10.91
$15.68
Local Commercial
Fundraising
$17.46
$25.09
Special Event
$14.73
$21.17
Regular Use
$12.00
$17.25
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising
$18.55
$26.66
Special Event
$15.82
$22.74
Regular Use
$13.09
$18.82
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988
SCHEDULE T"
6727-2010
Maple Ridge
Leisure Centre Admission
Rates
Effective
January 1, 2011
"Flexi"
taxes extra
3
6
single
10 visits
20 visits 1 month
months
months
1 year
Children
2.70
24.30
43.20 27.00
68.85
129.60
259.20
Youth
3.45
31.10
55.20 34.50
87.98
165.60
331.20
Senior
3.45
31.10
55.20 34.50
87.98
165.60
331.20
Adult
5.30
47.70
84.80 53.00
135.15
254.40
508.80
$
$
$ $
$
$
$
Family
9.25
83.30
148.00 92.50
235.88
444.00
888.00
6727-2010
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988
SCHEDULE"G"
Sport Fields
Municipal & School District 42
taxes extra CLASS A CLASS B
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial Use
21.55
16.05
Fundraising
10.78
8.03
Special Event
5.39
4.01
Regular Use
0.00
0.00
Adult Non Profit
Commercial Use
21.55
16.05
Fundraising
21.55
16.05
Special Event
$16.55
$11.05
Regular Use
$11.55
$6.05
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising
32.33
24.08
Special Event
26.94
20.06
Regular Use
21.55
16.05
Local Commercial
Fundraising
34.48
25.68
Special Event
29.09
21.67
Regular Use
23.71
17.66
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising
36.64
27.29
Special Event
31.25
23.27
Regular Use
25.86
19.26
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
CLASS C
5.36
2.68
1.34
0.00
5.36
5.36
2.68
0.00
8.04
6.70
5.36
8.58
7.24
5.90
9.11
7.77
6.43
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988
SCHEDULE "H"
6727-2010
Drop In Skating Admission Rates
Effective January 1, 2011
taxes extra
Children
Youth
Senior
Adult
Family
Parentlfot $
(Adult + child under 3)
single
10 visits
20 visits
$ 2.25
$
20.30
$
36.00
$ 2.75
$
24.80
$
44.00
$ 2.75
$
24.80
$
44.00
$ 3.90
$
35.10
$
62.40
$ 6.55
$
59.00
$
104.80
3.25
$
29.30
$
52.00
6727-2010
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988
SCHEDULE "J"
Greg Moore Youth Centre
Effective January 1, 2011
taxes extra Multi -Purpose Lounge Inside Active Area Whole Facility
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial Use
$14.96
$20.94
$65.78
$101.68
Fundraising
$7.48
$10.47
$52.53
$70.48
Special Event
$3.74
$5.24
$45.91
$54.89
Regular Use
$0.00
$0.00
$35.35
$35.35
Adult Non Profit
Commercial Use
$14.96
$20.94
$65.78
$101.68
Fundraising
$14.96
$20.94
$65.78
$101.68
Special Event
$9.96
$15.94
$60.78
$86.68
Regular Use
$4.96
$10.94
$55.78
$71.68
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising
$22.44
$31.41
$98.67
$152.52
Special Event
$18.70
$26.18
$82.23
$127.10
Regular Use
$14.96
$20.94
$65.78
$101.68
Local Commercial
Fundraising
$23.94
$33.50
$105.25
$162.69
Special Event
$20.20
$28.27
$88.80
$137.27
Regular Use
$16.46
$23.03
$72.36
$111.85
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising
$25.43
$35.60
$111.83
$172.86
Special Event
$21.69
$30.36
$95.38
$147.44
Regular Use
$17.95
$25.13
$78.94
$122.02
6727-2010
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988
SCHEDULE"K"
Hammond Community Centre
Effective January 1, 2011
taxes extra Large Hall 1/2 Large Hall Small Hall (Preschool Rm)
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial Use
$44.34
$22.17
$17.77
Fundraising
$31.09
$15.55
$8.89
Special Event
$24.47
$12.24
$4.44
Regular Use
$16.06
$8.03
$0.00
Adult Non Profit
Commercial Use
$44.34
$22.17
$17.77
Fundraising
$44.34
$22.17
$17.77
Special Event
$39.34
$19.67
$12.77
Regular Use
$34.34
$17.17
$7.77
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising
$66.51
$33.26
$26.66
Special Event
$55.43
$27.71
$22.21
Regular Use
$44.34
$22.17
$17.77
Local Commercial
Fundraising
$70.94
$35.47
$28.43
Special Event
$59.86
$29.93
$23.99
Regular Use
$48.77
$24.39
$19.55
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising
$75.38
$37.69
$30.21
Special Event
$64.29
$32.15
$25.77
Regular Use
$53.21
$26.60
$21.32
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988
SCHEDULE "L"
6727-2010
Park Shelter Fees
Effective January 1, 2011
taxes extra
Park Shelter
Rental $ 51.20
(Up to a full day)
Equipment Fee
Effective July 1, 2011
taxes extra
Event Trailer $ 147.31
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 - 1988
SCHEDULE W"
6727-2010
Outdoor Pool Admissions
Effective January 1, 2011
Harris Road Pool & Hammond Pool
taxes extra
single Season Pass
Children
$ 1.45 $ 34.50
Youth
$ 2.15 $ 37.95
Senior
$ 2.15 $ 37.95
Adult
$ 2.75 $ 42.50
Family
$ 5.50 $ 94.15
RIDGEMAPLE
Beep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE: April 1, 2010
FILE NO:
ATTN: C.O.W.
SAFERHOME STANDARDS SOCIETY MUNICIPAL MEMBERSHIP
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The SAFERHome Standards Society is a non-profit organization that has created building standards
for greater indoor accessibility that will improve the quality of life for seniors and persons with a
disability. It provides education and resources to its members to support them in creating housing in
their community that is universally accessible for everyone.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the District of Maple Ridge purchase a municipal membership with the SAFERHome Standards
Society for the current membership year and consider ongoing membership funding for future years
in the 2011 business plan.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
In October 2009, Mr. Patrick Simpson of the SAFERHome Standards Society made a
presentation to Maple Ridge Council and it was moved and seconded "that the information be
forwarded to the Maple Ridge -Pitt Meadows Municipal Advisory Committee on Accessibility
Issues (MACAI) for review and comment." (October 13, 2009 Council meeting)
In November 2009, the SAFERHome Standards Society sent a request for MACAI to request
Council approval of the SAFERHome Municipal membership or sponsorship. The Municipal
Advisory Committee on Accessibility Issues (MACAI) recommended that "Maple Ridge Council
approve the SAFERHome Municipal membership or sponsorship as presented to Council on
Tuesday, October 13, 2009, and further that MACAI recommends a presentation from
SAFERHome Society be made to Pitt Meadows Council." (November 19, 2009 MACAI meeting).
The SAFERHome Standards Municipal Membership has a yearly fee of $1,300 and this includes:
• a two hour on site training session for staff
• a 25% discount on additional training and seminars
• permission to use the SAFERHome logo on the District website, and
• a 25% discount on the SAFERHome manual for the Building department.
b) Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome is to ensure District staff receives education and resource information
available through the SAFERhome Standard Society and to advocate for housing that is
universally accessible.
1154
c) Strategic Alignment:
Participating in this initiative supports achieving a Safe and Livable Community by providing
an increased awareness of universally designed housing that is accessible to everyone
regardless of physical abilities.
d) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
Funding for the 2010 membership can be covered within the remaining funding from the
Measuring Up grant. Funding for future years' membership fees will need to be considered
in the 2011 business planning cycle.
The SAFERHome Standards Society membership would provide District of Maple Ridge staff with
training and resources on accessible indoor design for new construction. This membership would
also increase the awareness for the accessible housing need in Maple Ridge and the positive impact
that this type of housing can have for seniors and persons with a disability.
jf�r..a-4�
Prepared by: Amelia Bowden
Recreation Access Coordinator
Approved by: Mike Murray
General Manager, Community Development
Parks and Recreation
ConcurrencE` J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
Vab]