HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-09-12 Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
September 12, 2011
1:00 P.M.
Council Chamber
Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting
takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to
Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more
information or clarification before proceeding to Council.
Note: If required, there will be a 15-minute break at 3:00 p.m.
Chair. Acting Mayor
1. DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS - (10 minutes each)
1:00 P.M.
1.1 BC Hydro Smart Meters - Val MacDonald
2. PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Note: Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications may be permitted
to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes.
Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council
Agenda:
1101 2011-045-RZ, 12087 240 Street, RS-3 to R-1 and R-2
Staff report dated September 12, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6862-2011 to include a new R-2
(Urban Residential District) zone in the Urban Residential Designation be
given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6828-2011 to allow a future
subdivision of 10 single family dwellings be given second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing.
Committee of the Whole Agenda
September 12, 2011
Page 2 of 4
1102 RZ/086/08, 12060, 12074, 12068, 12082 227 Street, First Extension
Staff report dated September 12, 2011 recommending that a one year
extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/086/08 to permit
construction of a four -storey, wood -frame, 81 unit residential apartment
building.
1103 DP/002/08, 11580 223 Street
Staff report dated September 12, 2011 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/002/08 to permit development of a
four storey wood frame apartment building.
1104 2011-103-DVP, 20683 Westfield Avenue
Staff report dated September 12, 2011 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2011-103-DVP to reduce side yard
setbacks.
1105 Release of Landscape Buffer Restrictive Covenant, 24730 to 24790 102A
Avenue
Staff report dated September 12, 2011 recommending that Landscape Buffer
Restrictive Covenant BX528664 be released.
1106 Contract No. ITT-EN10-171 Amendment for Road Reconstruction
River Road Drainage Improvements (Darby Street to Carshill Street)
Staff report dated September 12, 2011 recommending that Contract No. ITT-
EN10-171; River Road Drainage Improvements (Darby Street to Carshill
Street) awarded to Double M Excavating Ltd. be increased.
1107 Summer Market - September
Staff report dated September 12, 2011 recommending that the use of
municipal streets be authorized for the Summer Market on Sunday,
September 24, 2011.
1108 Drinking Water Quality Report 2010
Staff report dated September 12, 2011 providing information on the
regulatory framework and water quality monitoring data for 2010.
Committee of the Whole Agenda
September 12, 2011
Page 3 of 4
1109 Local Newspaper Advertising
Staff report dated September 12, 2011 recommending that a contract be
awarded to the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows News for all regular and local
advertising for a period of one year with an option to renew and that the
Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
3. FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERVICES (including Fire and Police)
1131 Disbursements for the month ended July 31, 2011
Staff report dated September 12, 2011 recommending that the
disbursements for the month of July 2011 be approved.
4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERVICES
1151
5. CORRESPONDENCE
fi5val
E. OTHER ISSUES
1181
7. ADJOURNMENT
Committee of the Whole Agenda
September 12, 2011
Page 4 of 4
8. COMMUNITY FORUM
COMMUNITY FORUM
The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to ask questions of
Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing
by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the
podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the
individual members of Council. The total time for this Forum is limited to 15
minutes.
If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a
response will be given.
Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings and
delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or
via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings.
Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future
of this community.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca
Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca
Checked by 4 �
Date:
MAPLE RIDGE
District of Maple Ridge
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: September 12, 2011
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-045-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading:
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6862-2011; and
Second Reading:
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6828 - 2011
12087 240 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) and a new zone, R-2 (Urban Residential District). The new
zone, R-2 (Urban Residential District), requires a text amendment to Appendix C, Zoning Matrix, of
the Official Community Plan to include the new zone.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6862-2011 be given First and
Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
2. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and
on- going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 6862-2011 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to
provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on
the bylaw;
3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6862-2011 be considered in
conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
4. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6862-
2011 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6613 - 2008 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to
Public Hearing; and
1101
6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading.
Road dedication as required;
ii. Removal of any existing buildings;
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Pivotal Development Consultants Ltd.
Owner: 0871933 BC LTD
Legal Description: North 1/2 of Lot 6, Section 21, Township 12, NWD Plan 2512
except Plans 18013 and BCP46754
CoZow
Existing: Urban Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: R-1(Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District)
Surrounding Uses:
North:
Use:
Single Family Residential
Zone:
RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential
Designation
Urban Residential
South:
Use:
Single Family Residential
Zone:
RS-3 (Rural Residential)
Designation:
Urban Residential
East:
Use:
Single Family Residential
Zone:
RS-3 (Rural Residential)
Designation:
Estate Suburban Residential
West:
Use:
Municipal Works Yard
Zone:
P-6 (Civic Institutional)
Designation:
Institutional
Existing Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 0.504 ha (1.25ac)
Access: 121 Avenue and a new road on the site from 240 Street
Servicing requirement: Full Urban
-2-
b) Project Description:
The development site is a large relatively flat lot on the west side of 240 Street and south of 121
Avenue. The lot has been vacant for several years but was previously a single family rural residential
use. The development proposal is for a 10 lot subdivision of single family lots. The Municipal Works
Yard is located to the west of the site; large suburban single family lots are located to the east and
south; and a newer single family subdivision of urban single family lots are located to the north.
The applicant proposes to extend 121 Avenue east across the top of the site to connect with 240
Street and provide access for 5 R-1 (Residential District) zoned lots. Road dedication of 6 metres is
required on the west side of 240 Street. A new cul-de-sac is proposed on the site at the south end
which will provide access for 5 R-2 (Urban Residential District) zoned lots. The new cul-de-sac will
also provide access for future development of the lands to the south.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The development site is located on the west side of 240 Street, which is identified as a major
corridor, and is within the Urban Area boundary. The land is designated Urban Residential and the
proposed development is consistent with the Major Corridor Residential Infill Policies 3-18, 3-20 and
3-22 for development on a major corridor.
An amendment to Appendix C, Zoning Matrix, of the Official Community Plan is required to include
the proposed new R-2 (Urban Residential District) Zone in the Urban Residential Designation.
Zoning Bylaw:
The applicant is proposing to rezone the development site to R-1 (Residential District) and a new
zone, R-2 (Urban Residential District) for a subdivision of approximately 10 single family dwellings.
R-2 (Urban Residential District) is a new zone proposed to bridge the lot size gap between the
existing R-1 (Residential District) and the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zones, and will
have a minimum lot size of 315m2 (3400ft2).
The R-2 (Urban Residential District) has already received Third Reading with application RZ/067/10.
However, should that application not proceed or be delayed, this application would be stalled
awaiting the adoption of the R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone. To avoid this potential delay it
would be appropriate to proceed with another R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone bylaw with this
application. Whichever application proceeds to Final Reading first will adopt the bylaw. The bylaw
that does not complete can simply be closed.
Proposed Variances:
This application will require 2 variances that will be subject of a future Council report. The variances
a re:
1. To allow the existing above -ground Telus plant that fronts the site on 240 Street to remain.
2. To allow the driveway proposed for Lot 6 at 4.5m from the intersection corner rather than
at 7.5m.
-3-
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department advised that all the required services for rezoning are available
for the site; therefore a Rezoning Servicing Agreement will not be required. An additional 3m
of road dedication will be provided on the west side of 240 Street to allow for the installation
of a storm sewer within the boulevard. At the subdivision stage, temporary turn -around,
protected by a covenant, will be required on Lot 7 until the cul-de-sac can be completed on the
lands to the south in the future. The Engineering Department is in support of the proposed
variances as noted above.
Parks & Leisure Services Department.
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is
completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it
is estimated that there will be an additional 10 trees which is based on one tree per lot; final
subdivision design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has
advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget
requirements by $250.00.
e) intergovernmental Issues:
Local Government Act:
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act requirement for consultation during the
development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council had considered at the June 14,
2011 Council Meeting, whether consultation is required with, specifically:
i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the
case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iv. First Nations;
v: School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards, and
vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
And, in that regard, recommended that no additional consultation is required in respect of this
matter beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website,
together with an invitation to the public to comment.
An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any
affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section
882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, Appendix B, has been considered and
it has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required,
including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First
Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments.
M
The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste
Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact.
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that First and Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community
Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6862 - 2011, that Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6828 - 2011, and that application 2011-045-RZ be forwarded to Public
Hearing.
Prepared by: Ann Edwards, CPT
Senior Planning Technician
1
/Approve_g-by. ne PP, MCIP
( Direcvr of Planning
Approved by,� Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
I GM: Public Works & Developmont Services
l _ .
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
AE /
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - OCP Amending Bylaw 6862 - 2011
Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw 6828 - 2011
Appendix D - Subdivision Plan
2'0
12242
ABERNETHY WAY A
RP 8440
EP 14184
JBCP
aD 12224
012247M3 4
3 2 �A �B 14 13 3346 5
j LMP 31 29 BCP415644 BCp 3346 12239
n
j C P 10� 9 g
11 8 12225 w
N En 5 PARK 12 = :�� 8 m 7 m
BCP 13346 1229E fi 12180 12209
1
.!�, 8 +his g 26 27 12183
i e 12155 12160
2 �
7 sj !�, 12145 12150 2
'2 ��+ 10 v125 28 12169
36 6 °9
12135 12140 6 3
'r ca 24 29
2162
5 3 e41 12 u] 0 12155
> 2l�� 13 iL 12125 N 30 v 4 S1/28
4
'�. ' J 23 m 12130 12141
14 Q LMP 133 12113 N 12120 5
r
bra 15 Y, 18 19 20 22 PP098
16 17 m :12:1�05 12 SUBJECT PROPERTY N 1/27
N N
S 1/2 7
121 AVE
F12126
LMP 30402
BCP 46754
6
P 2512
Rem N 1/2 6
12112 PP097
12087/12115 5
P 82308
3 2084
12079
Rem 1 4
0 2
a! 12077
b.
1 12074
12067
3
P 57747 12040
20
14
Rem 21
APPENDIX A
a
n
a
Rem 2
I P 88032 I o
1 N /I N
LMP 30401
P 86310 DEWDNEY TRUNK
Cl
�# Pitt
Meadows j
w.
0 12087 240 STREET
{ iZ CORPORATION OF
-- 4, '1_.. i _L L7 I r �, THE DISTRICT OF
N J - x j� MAPLE RIDGE
District of ' r " v
Langley _�.. — — i� PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SCALE 1:2,500
DATE: Apr27, 2011 FILE: 2011-045-RZ BY: PC
FRASER
APPENDIX B
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6862-2011
A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" forming part of
the Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 as amended
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "A" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open
meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 6862-2011."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
North Half Lot 6 Section 21 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 2512 Except Plans
18013 and BCP46754.
to add R-2 to Appendix C, Zoning Matrix, in the Urban Residential designation.
3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 as amended is hereby amended
accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME the day of A.D. 20 .
READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 20
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 20
READ A THIRD TIME the day of A.D. 20 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of A.D. 20
PRESIDING MEMBER
CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6828 - 2011
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6828 - 2011."
2. That PART 3 BASIC PROVISIONS, SECTION 302 ZONES (1) is amended by inserting
the following between "R-1 Residential District" and "R-3 Special Amenity Residential
District"
R-2 Urban Residential District
3. Amend Schedule "D" Minimum Lot Area and Dimensions by the addition of the
following;
"R-2 see section 60113"
after
"R-1 12m 24m 371m2"
4. Amend PART 6 RESIDENTIAL ZONES, SECTION 601, ONE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL ZONES (R-1, RS-1, RS-1a, RS-1b, SRS, RS-1c, RS-1d, RS-2, RS-3, RT-1,
RE) by the deletion of the section in its entirety and replacement with the following:
6010NE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES (R-1, R-2, R-3 RS-1, RS-1a,
RS-1b, SRS, RS-1c, RS-1d, RS-2, RS-3, RT-1, RE, CD-1-93)
A. PERMITTED USES OF LAND, BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES
Subject to the regulations of Section 401, 402 and 601B, the following uses and
no others shall be permitted in the zone indicated:
USE
ZONE IN WHICH USE IS PERMITTED
R-1
R-2
R-3
RS-1
RS-1a
RS-1b
RS-1c
RS-1d
RS-2
RS-3
RT-1
SRS
RE
CD-1-
93
Agriculture
✓
✓
✓
One Family
Residential
J
J
J
J
✓
J
J
J
J
V/
J
J
✓
Two Family
Residential
Boarding
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Accessory
Residential
J
J
J
J
✓
✓
V/
V/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Accessory
Home
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
J
✓
✓
✓
✓
Occupation
Accessory Off -
Street Parking
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
✓
Accessory
Employee
Residential
Accessory
Produce Sales
✓
Elderly Citizens
Residential
J
Temporary
Residential
(subject to
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Section 402)
Rental Stable
Temporary
Tourist
✓
✓
✓
✓
V/
V/
✓
Accomodation
Secondary
Suite
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Residential
Hobby Kennel
Neighbourhood
Daycare
✓
✓
V/
✓
V/✓
✓
✓
Detached
Garden Suite
✓
✓
J
J
✓
J
Use (subject to
Section 402)
Page 2
5. That PART 6 RESIDENTIAL ZONES is amended by inserting the following after Section
601A "CD-1-93 Amenity Residential District".
601E R-2 Urban Residential District
A. PERMITTED USES
Subject to the regulations of Section 401 and Section 601, the following uses and no
others shall be permitted in the R-2 zone.
1. One Family Residential (limited to one per lot)
2. Boarding Use (Sec. 401 & 601)
3. Accessory Residential Use
4. Accessory Home Occupation Use (Sec. 401)
5. Accessory Off Street Parking Use
6. Temporary Residential Use (subject to Section 402)
B. DENSITY
1. All buildings and structures shall not exceed a lot coverage of 50%;
2. Buildings and structures for Accessory Residential Use shall not exceed a lot
coverage of 12%
C. AREA AND DIMENSIONS
1. Lot Area
a) No person shall create a lot which is less than 315 m2 in area.
2. Lot Dimensions
a) Width:
With lane access:
No person shall create an interior lot which is less than 9.2 metres in
width measured at a distance of 7.5 metres from the front property line.
No person shall create an exterior lot which borders either a street or
lane on 2 sides, one of which is a side lot line which is less than 13.2m in
width measured at a distance of 7.5 metres from the front property line.
ii Without lane access:
No person shall create an interior lot which is less than 10.5 m in width
measured at a distance 7.5 metres from the front property line.
No person shall create an exterior lot which borders either a street or
lane on 2 sides, one of which is a side lot line which is less than 13.5
metres in width measured at a distance of 7.5 metres from the front
property line.
b) Depth:
No person shall create a lot which is less than 27 metres in depth.
Page 3
D. YARD REQUIREMENTS
a) Regulations for the size, shape and siting of buildings and structures shall be:
1. For lots with a rear lane, shall be sited not less than:
a) 3.0 metres from the front lot line;
b) 13.0 metres from the rear lot line;
c) 1.2 metres from the interior lot line;
d) 3.0 metres from an exterior side lot line;
2. For lots with no rear lane, shall be sited not less than:
a) 3.0 metres from the front lot line except that the distance to the garage
shall not be less than 5.5 metres;
b) 8.0 metres from the rear lot line;
c) 1.2 metres from the interior lot line;
d) 3.0 metres from the exterior lot line.
b) Buildings and Structures for Accessory Residential Use and Accessory Off -Street
Parking Use shall be sited not less than:
i) 1.0 metres from the rear lot line;
ii) 0.45 metres from an interior side lot line provided that a minimum setback
of 2 m is maintained for the other side yard;
iii) 2.0 metres from an exterior side yard;
iv) 11.0 metres from a front lot line;
v) 4.5 metres from a principal use measured from the face of any chimney, bay
window, hutch or nook permitted elsewhere in this bylaw.
E. HEIGHT
1. All buildings and structures for one family residential use shall not exceed a
height of 9.75 metres nor 2 storeys in height.
2. All buildings used for accessory residential use and/or accessory off street
parking use shall not exceed a height of 4.9 metres.
F. OTHER REGULATIONS:
1. Access
Vehicular access for lots backing on a Municipal lane will be restricted to the
lane.
G. Off Street Parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with "Maple Ridge Off
Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990."
H. A residential use shall be permitted only if the site is serviced to the standard set out
in Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 4800 - 1993 as
amended.
Page 4
6. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
North Half of Lot 6 Section 21 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 2512
Except Plans 18013 and BCP46754
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1522 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1(Residential District), R-2
(Urban Residential District).
7. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 14th day of June, A.D. 2011.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of
PRESIDING MEMBER
Page 5
,A.D. 20 .
CORPORATE OFFICER
D
L
2 3
4
3 2 A B 14 13
BCP 3346
5
ch
Lo
LMP 31 29 BCP 44 BCP 3346
d
P 6
a
6
10
9
~
11
w
5 PARK
12
8
v~
m 7
8CP 13346
6
1
a
26
27
9
2
7
i6
10
8 25
28
0 3
6
11
_
24
29
fo
5 e4 12
a
U� 4
�13
4
13
23
J�
N
30
w
91
14 LMP 13
5
15 18 19
22
20
31
fi
16 17
21 32
121 AVE.
31029
Rem Pd.'A'
LMP 30402
P 82308
Rem 1
BCP 46754
P 2512
n
S 1/2 8 co
Lo
*PP098
N 1/2 7
S 1/2 7
6
d
*PP097
5
3
0 2 4
a
I 3
P 57747
BCP 28926(lease)
14
1 I - I .W
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No. 6828-2011
Map No. 1522
From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
To: 0 R-1 (Residential District)
® R-2 (Urban Residential District)
20
RW 30273 a
Rem 21
BCP2 1
Pd II
Rem 2
N
SCALE 1:2,500
APPENDIX D
. District of Maple Ridge
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE:
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING:
SUBJECT: Rezoning - First Extension
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6712-2010
12060, 12074, 12068, 12082 227 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
September 12, 2011
RZ/086/O8
CofW
The applicant for the above noted file has applied for an extension to this rezoning application under
Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. The application proposes to rezone
the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment
Residential) to permit construction of a four -storey, wood -frame, 81 unit residential apartment
building. This project is eligible for the Town Centre Incentive Program.
RECOMMENDATION:
That a one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/O86/O8 and that the following
conditions be addressed prior to consideration of final reading:
Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of
the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement;
ii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the
suitability of the site for the proposed development;
iii. Road dedication as required;
iv. Consolidation of the development site;
V. Removal of the existing buildings;
vi. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether
there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site
profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the
regulations.
vii. Purchase of Parcel A, Except Plan BCP36787 Road, from the District of Maple Ridge.
viii. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking.
-1-
1102
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Wilson Chang
Owner: Balhar S Basi
Legal Description:
Lot: 2, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 7450
Lot: 1, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 86322
Lot: 2, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 86322
Lot: B, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 22808
OCP:
Existing:
Urban Residential
Proposed:
Urban Residential
Zoning:
Existing:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed:
RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
Surrounding Uses
North:
Use:
Apartment
Zone:
RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
Designation
Low -Rise Apartment
South:
Use:
District Fire Hall
Zone:
P-6 (Civic Institutional)
Designation:
Institutional
East:
Use:
Single family residential
Zone:
RS-1(One Family Urban Residential)
Designation:
Low -Rise Apartment
West:
Use:
Single family residential
Zone:
RS-1(One Family Urban Residential)
Designation:
Medium and High -Rise Apartment
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
Single Family Residential
Low Rise Apartment
0.388 HA
Proposed rear lane access
Full Urban
DP/086/08
The current application proposes to rezone the properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit the construction of a four storey
apartment building containing 81 units with a floor area ratio of 1.46. The apartments are a mix of
one and two -bedroom units, ranging in size from 50.31m2 (542ft2) to 88.26m2 (950ft2). The
building is a four storey wood frame apartment structure over a one storey concrete basement
parking level. An access ramp to the underground resident parking is to be provided via the
proposed rear -lane. Seventeen visitor surface parking spaces are proposed to be located at the rear
of the building, adjacent to the lane.
WA
Application Progress:
The applicant has been working towards completion of the terms and conditions for Final Reading of
the Zone Amending Bylaw. The applicant requests an extension to this application to await a more
advantageous time for development.
Alternatives:
Council may choose one of the following alternatives:
1. grant the request for extension;
2. deny the request for extension; or
3. repeal third reading of the bylaw and refer the bylaw to Public Hearing.
CONCLUSION:
The applicant has been pursuing the completion of this rezoning application and has applied for a
one year extension. It is recommended that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6712-2010 be
granted a one year extension.
Prepared by: Sarah Atkinson
Planning Technician
a^-
ve �/ q - ZZ. -I- ��
Approved by:
Ja Pickering, MCP, MCIP
ire r of P ng
e
by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - First Reading Report
-3-
,2175 -- APPENDIX A
S 1/2 10 BCS
12170
Pcl.A 12177
56793 12167
5
P 23392
12157
.
� 13
or
12179
N 1/2A
12166/68
P 66473
355
12153
1z1sz LO
N 1/2 9 00
-
� Rem 2
P 7948
S 1/2 A
12154
12152 S 1/2 9
_
a S. 52.5' 2
7
P 23392 12141
2 c
12142 Cl)
354
12147
12148 331
B
1
o
v
1 332 LMP 406
12136 � � a 353 P 5 987
12139 12136
2 12131 12128
12130 P 9944 10 4r N1/2 16 338 402 4
P 38897 °O 337
S1/2 16 P 2211 P 67081
175 a 12119 12126
12120 147 12114 'PP090
12111 1 2 ' N50'5
12090 N P 6 638 Rem. 5
148
1 M 2102 a
12101
,VE- BCS 1124 A o
Rem 10 12096
290
P 22808 P 11644 12086 a
N N N N N N N B
� 1 '2 "'3 B 12087
287 288 289 91 12082
N 1/2 12076 1
P 446 P 4 724 22087 1 1112081 A
12g74 c S 1/2 BCP 30103
11 m
P 446 P 724 d 292 12os8 2 12071 v 12062 d
296 295 294 12077 N 1/2 U B
6 5 4 P 7450 o- 1212067 LL J
m o
— Rem N N 70' 2 S 1/2 2054
293 1206V 12 12057 S 1/2 7 Cl) N70' N130' of 2
M
OWN AVE- RP 84340 Rem. A 12042
a
N 1/2 6 o Rem. N 130' of 2
w n N o 0 0 0 0 12038 d
300 S 1 /2 6
N N N N N N Rem. 2
N N N N N N N N
7 8 9 297 298 299 12047 17
P 446 301 Rem. Pol, A 12032
P 43 24
Rem.
rn
BCP 34253 310 16 18 N n� N N P 5 3270
P 446 �' 2 P 51311
P 2D546 r M w
11 co 1 o v ao
D h o- 7 E M M
g 1 N o N 15 a N N N
N .a N, N N 2026 N
P 61650
DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD
0
0 0 oc) r
N N r r
N N N N N N Rem.A N N N
N ry 4 a ctoo a P 9541 P,
.
LoU 3 61 N LANE oo
oo
P 8695 11971 d 1
District of rj r-
Pitt Meadows
12060/68/74/82 - 227 Street
y
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
N Albion
- 4 MAPLE RIDGE
District of l PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Langley `� -r
SCALE 1:2,000� it
fi:4 DATE: Sep 18, 2008 RZ/086/08 BY: JV
River
APPENDIX B
f
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 4, 2010
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/086/08
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6712-2010
12060, 12074, 12068, 12082 227 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Residential) to permit construction of a four -storey, wood -
frame, 81 unit residential apartment building. This application is in compliance with the Official
Community Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6712-2010 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing; and
2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading.
Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of
the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement;
ii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the
suitability of the site for the proposed development;
iii. Road dedication as required;
iv. Consolidation of the development site;
V. Removal of the existing buildings;
vi. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether
there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site
profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the
regulations.
vii. Purchase of Parcel A, Except Plan BCP36787 Road, from the District of Maple. Ridge.
viii. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Wilson Chang, MAIBC
Owner: Balhar S Basi
Legal Description: Lot: 2, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 7450
Lot: 1, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 86322
Lot: 2, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 86322
Lot: B, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 22808
;�Z ]a
Existing:
Low Rise Apartment
Proposed:
Low Rise Apartment
Zoning:
Existing:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed:
RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
Surrounding Uses
North:
Use:
Apartment
Zone:
RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
Designation
Low -Rise Apartment
South:
Use:
District Fire Hall
Zone:
P-6 (Civic Institutional)
Designation:
Institutional
East:
Use:
Single family residential
Zone:
RS-1(One Family Urban Residential)
Designation:
Low -Rise Apartment
West:
Use:
Single family residential
Zone:
RS-1(One Family Urban Residential)
Designation:
Medium and High -Rise Apartment
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
b) Project Description:
Single family residential
Low rise apartment
0.388 HA
Proposed rear lane access
Full Urban
DP/086/08
The current application proposes to rezone the properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit the construction of a four storey
apartment building containing 81 units with a floor area ratio of 1.46. The apartments are a mix of
one and two -bedroom units, ranging in size from 50.31m2 (542ft2) to 88.26m2 (950ft2). The
building is a four storey wood frame apartment structure over a one storey concrete basement
parking level. An access ramp to the underground resident parking is to be provided via the
proposed rear -lane. Seventeen visitor surface parking spaces are proposed to be located at the rear
of the building, adjacent to the lane.
-2-
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The proposed rezoning to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) is in accordance with the
subject properties designation as "Low -Rise Apartment" in the Town Centre Area Plan. The Low -Rise
Apartment designation is intended for development in a three to five storey apartment form where
units are accessed from an internal corridor and residential parking is provided underground. The
current 4-storey development proposal complies with the above criteria.
Both 227th Street and Brown Avenue are identified in the Town Centre Area Plan, Figure 1 - Multi -
modal Transportation network, as part of the Connective Pedestrian Network. This network is
intended to provide pedestrian -friendly linkages outside of the Civic Core and should be designed to
enhance the pedestrian experience with separated sidewalks on both sides of the street, street trees
and the potential for wayfinding signage. Additionally, both 227th Street and Brown Avenue are part
of the Bicycle Network. The Bicycle Network may have dedicated bicycle lanes, where feasible, or
shared arrow markings in street travel lanes to clearly identify bicycle routes to motorists, cyclists,
and pedestrians. The Engineering Department will be reviewing these guidelines with the proponent
at the time civil drawings are finalized.
Zoning Bvlaw:
A preliminary review of the plans has revealed that the proposal complies with the requirements of
Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985.
Off -Street Parkin, and Loading Bvlaw:
A preliminary review of the plans in relation to the Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw
requirements has revealed that the proposal generally complies with the bylaw, although the
application proposes a variance to reduce the total number of required parking stalls from 138 to
130. The applicant proposes to provide residents with 113 parking stalls and visitors with 17
parking stalls; resulting in a total of 130 parking stalls provided for the development. The Off -Street
Parking and Loading Bylaw requires 122 resident parking stalls and 17 visitor parking stalls,
resulting in a shortfall of 9 resident parking stalls.
In accordance with Section 3.4 of the Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw, the applicant has opted
to pay to the District of Maple Ridge a total of $72,000 in lieu of 9 parking stalls. An up to date
parking study is required to support the proposed reduction.
Development Permits:
As per Section 8.11 of the Official Community Plan, a Town Centre Development Permit is required
for all new multi -family residential development in the town centre. The development proposal is
located within the North View Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan. Accordingly, prior to the
issuance of a building permit, the Development Permit must be reviewed and approved. An
application for the Development Permit has been received and will be the subject of a future Council
report.
W3
Advisory Design Panel:
The application was presented to the Advisory Design Panel on February 9, 2010, at which time the
Panel supported the application moving forward to Council, with the following resolution;
• Consider more contemporary material palette consistent with the architecture
• Consider the issue of the visitor parking stalls in conflict with the adjacent units
• Consider relocation of the amenity room to be on the main floor and have direct access to
the open courtyard
• Consider securing the open courtyard for the safety of the building
• Resolve the design of the main entry to the building and incorporate a significant canopy and
coordinate with the landscape design
• Consider increasing the depth of the balconies to improve functionality
• Define a visitor access route from the surface parking to the building entry point
• Consider introduction of additional screens to the other elevations
• Consider simplifying the vertical glazing at the main entry
• Consider altering the parapet heights to create a more varied roof line
• Incorporate a barrier free washroom within the amenity room
The applicant will address the above recommendations and a more detailed report will be forwarded
to Council at the Development Permit stage.
Develo ment Information Meetin :
A Development Information Meeting was held by the project architect on Tuesday March 2, 2010 at
Harry Hooge Elementary. As per Council Policy 6.20, invitations were mailed out to qualifying
property owners, advertisements were placed in the local paper and a notice was attached to the
development sign on site. Four (4) people signed in on the attendance sheet and one (1) comment
sheet was completed. The Development Information Meeting summary provided by the applicant is
attached at Appendix G. Additional concerns expressed are included below along with the
applicant's response (in italics);
• Noise and safety issues are a concern if the proposed back lane continues through to the
lane on the neighbouring property to the north. People may use this lane as a short cut;
The lane does not necessarily need to go through to eliminate this concern. Or other
steps could be taken to reduce these concerns, such as speed bumps or only
permitted access allowed.
The proposed entrance to the underground parking is very close to the neighbouring
property. This may result in noise and pollution becoming a nuisance;
-4-
There will be planting and fencing between the two properties to screen noise and
pollution. In addition there will be a trellis over the ramp entrance to provide the
best possible screening.
• The proposed building will block views for the neighbouring property to the north;
The proposed building will also block the noise from the fire hall.
■ Building construction will be noisy for the neighbouring residents.
Construction will follow all City guidelines for safety and hours of operation.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering De rtment:
The Engineering Department has identified that all of the services required in support of the rezoning
do not exist to the site. It will, therefore, be necessary for the applicant to enter into a Rezoning
Development Agreement and post the required security to complete the necessary works prior to
final reading. The Engineering Department has provided the following comments;
1. The applicant is responsible for the construction of the rear lane.
2. The four existing driveways letdowns on 227 Street must be removed and replaced with new
concrete curb and gutter and sidewalk.
3. The developer's consultant must examine the existing sanitary sewer to determine its
adequacy to serve the new development.
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they
will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that
there will be additional trees added to the street tree inventory. The Manager of Parks & Open
Space has advised that there is maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree which will affect
their operating budget.
Fire De artment:
The Fire Department has no concerns with the current application.
-5-
CONCLUSION:
The current application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. It is, therefore,
recommended that First Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6712-2010 and it
be forwarded to Public Hearing.
Prepared by. Sarah Atkinson
Plaming Technician
Approv b Jan MCP, MCIP
tar of Planning
i.._
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
J GM: Publ' Works lapment Services
J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6712-2010
Appendix C - Site Plan
Appendix D - Building Elevation Plans
Appendix E - Landscape Plans
Appendix F - Development Information Meeting Summary
1-3F
122 AVE f 227 26-1 Rom
225
p
P 7219
234� 233ry 232 231R 230ry 229ry 228 Rem A
P 42, zz19
4
12211
r 3
r 12195
a 2
121a7
1
Pd. A 12177
RP 56793 17 TEL
24
P 1161
121 AVE
f s:7•c P 1419
P 2893
13, 130 Appendix A
197 12216 P 1970 8
12214 W 12221 1 216 12211
2 n 198 6 P 2923
12208 a a 12203 P 14396 2 1 12203
12208
12208
280
BCP 23946
66
- 265
Kerr
Co 12193
1219e
75' c
A
C.
12194
c
a 264
n
279 c
112192
m
m
65 d
12185
121& a
12191
a
P •
P 58171
12183
RE
1217fi
c 13
m
N 112 10
,2,7e
336
1z1e9
zlez
S 1/2 10
3[
N 112 A
12170
BCS 569
a
12170
5
P 23392 12157
17168168
P 7948
S 1/2 A
12114
P 66473
355
/2153
12162
N 112 9 avo
12161
n Rem 2
a
12152 S 1/2 9
- 12751
a S 52.5.2
2
30412147
7
12142
1214B 331
a 353
P 23392 21a1
1 a
12136
332 p 987
BCD
LMP 406
LL
12139
12136
12138
12131
17128
12131
2
u ao P 9944
1n N1/2 16
338
337
402 401
P 38897
S1/2 16
P 2211
175
a 12119
12126
P 67081 1z1z1
121 0
147
12114
PP090
N 12111
2
N 50' 5 12,15
1
148
. Rem5
12090
P 38
izto2
a 12195
-
290
" 2
^1
-2
"3
^1
12
"3
287
288
289
F E
843
Pi446
P 4
3724
291
12087
P
724
n
a 292
81
P
843
P 1446
296
295
294
12077
7
6
5
4
6
5
4
s
c
-
m Rem
293
RP 84340
BROWN AVE
- a
6 LOT A 5 7 8' 9 297 ^ 298 299 ry t2047 N
(P9687) 301
31 •LMP1821 P 46 P 43 24
9460 P 9687 P 446 2
1 2 1 11 M1 P 546
IL
1
12101
BCS 1124
Rem 10
,2096
A o
P 22808
P 1
,z0e5
a
,20a2 a Subject Properties
1
A
12074
r
BCP 30103
�N12088
2
j12
m'dBzo97
P 7450
N 70' 2
72054
12053
51/2
7
N70' N130' of 2
12042
v
a 12041
N 112 6
Rem N130'of2
t2o3B
a
7
L
S 1/2 6
Rem.2 12037
17
2032
Rem Pal. A
12028
30
Rem
18
BCP 34253
a
Q'
¢
P 5275D
37
16
N a
��
327
P5
-
n
U,
a
E
g
15 a
12026
a
d
a ti
P 6165)
DEWDNEV TRUNK
ROAD
6
p
93
YL
ti
4a
n
m
o
v
E¢
Rem �
4 a
1n
� a
¢
YUesl
Rem
n64
3
61
LANE
81.5
4
v
P 8695
IT971
Feet
1140-,
P 51167
n 3
e
q
a
'PP093
LP 73289
- tt983
m
P
a
t63
0. 2
3H AVE
)562
20
LMP 15424
P 12
AD
A
C2 T
40
a
2
1
m 3 ,a
d 11947 m
10- 0
N • Co
-Rem
2 a
a 11937
'PP088
11931
Rem.t
119 AVE
Plan 81350
n
11909
Rem A
57
P 9541
r-
P 46839
d
a
, 11989
g
c
n
1970 •PP084
B
7T
P 9541
P 67142
RP 61086
a 711963
9$3
LANE
194m4a
78
LMP 1 758
(P9541)
NWS 1556
EP 63907
11970'36
E
P 9541 a
119 AVE
P 76459
rn
3•
12154
12140
3:
12128
2'
12,120
2'
12112
41
112080
48
11954
49
Appendix B
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6712 - 2010
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6712-2010."
2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot "B" Section 20 Township 12 Plan 22808 New Westminster District
Lot 1 Section 20 Township 12 Plan 86322 New Westminster District
Lot 2 Section 20 Township 12 Plan 86322 New Westminster District
North 70 Feet Lot 2 Section 20 Township 12 Plan 7450 New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1469 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density
Apartment Residential).
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200.
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200.
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200.
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
Pcl. A
RP 56793
24
P 1161
1.914 ho
121 AVE.
qq
w
b
ry
2
ti 3
h
�
h
a2
h
"�
ryr
I
h290
28F
288
289
P
8843
P
944
P
4372
N 291
72087
I P
4372
292
P
8843
P
944
6
.,5
04
N6
h5
�4
24196
295
294
CL !r°77
ro
ry
ry
n
`�
nn
Rem
293
RP 54340
BROWN AVE.
a
e
h
o
1❑
❑
-
ti
ry
I n
300
N
LOT A
5
7
8
9
2b7
298
299
12•Jd7
N
(P9687
LMP1821
P
944
P 4
724
301
P 96
7
P
9446
^-
I
2
2
1
17
"'1
P
20546
h
r
h
1L
— — — —
— --w
�L
nh
h
�+
w.
h
Rem. Ln
West Rem. 264
00
81.5 4 U-)
Feet
4 a
P 7863
h u
3 61 LANE
P 8695 P 51167 N 119J
cv 3
'PP093 LP 73289a 2 `�
1196_
1 /2 1 0
12178N
336
Iz16
1 /2 10
BCS 569
lino
1216 N 1 2 9 co
/
J216
Rem 2
1 /2 9
— S. 52.5' 2 121S
12Js�
12141
8
121431
387
B
A
LMP 4
65
l21J9
J2128
127JJ
337
338
402
401
12126 P
62211
P 67
81 12721
72714
�. -PP090
2
°o N 50' 5 121 u
1
P 68638
Rem. 5
72102
a 12703
12096
p
12i786
8 CL
BCS 3189
12076
1
A kn
0.722 ha
i V
S 1 2
12054 x7
1205J
12 J2os
S 1/2 N70'
N130' of 2
cc
Rem, A
12042 co Q
12041
N 1 /2 1- Rem.
N 1 30- of 2
r20J9 a
ry
5 1 /2 6
r2012
Rem. 2
Rem. Pd. A
7
12012 Q
0.608 ho.
72028
N=
BCP 34253
31 0
ATO R 8. �01
P 52750
P 51311
_a^_
16 CN
327
CL
— — ---
ti
15o 0— aE,
• h Q h
ry
h
12026 `� y
tiry
P 61650
DEWONEY
TRUNK ROAD
❑
ry
�
",
Iti V
❑
Rem. A
I
57
P 9541
n coi
P 46839
I 00 rn i
d- 0) i
1
^ 11959
8
11970.PP084
I% o '
1.19 ho
ao
8
171 ��
a 7
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No. 6712-2010
Map No. 1469
From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
To: RM-2(Medium Density Apartment Residential)
1:2500
C
A
~ ' H
LU w
CO LU
Z a o m ¢
w p
LU On
cc. Lli 00 � 0
ao <
i
3� eNMo(Ve
Vf plk
Appendix C
is
1
�
�
v
HIMC,ysF
@
Jco
fF•!
C cR
�t
O
e
C
R
W
N (p
O
iilit
Cf.
EL
pp
w� ow
ZQ N
I
S
Cn ~
g
£
go Q
4s�gY�
¢ �-
83
y
w�
Appendix a
Appendix E
�
•■
Tim
�' _;;■ :
| |(E!!\ ||!!|[[!!§|t|! !! ![! ! |
�
-111-VIUD �-onuo uevelopmcnt
12060/68174192 227th Street. Maple Ridge
Appendix F
Wilson Chanc
architecture + online coilat,, . ..,W„
Architect Inc. MAIBC
To: Planning Department, District of Maple Ridge
Re: Development Information Meeting for 12060, 12068, 12074, 12082 227 ST, Maple Ridge, BC
March 3'°, 2010
DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION MEETING SUMMARY, RZ/086/08
hypertects.com
t 604.630.9488
f 604.630.9487
A development information meeting was held at Harry Hooge Elementary, 12280 - 230th Street, Maple Ridge on Tuesday,
March 2, 2010 from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. regarding residential development at 12060, 12068, 12074, 12082 227 ST, Maple
Ridge, File lr: RZ/086/08.
The meeting was attended by a group of approximately 6 people of which 4 signed in the attached attendance list
Wilson Chang from Wilson Chang Architect opened the meeting welcoming the attendees. Wilson encouraged the people
to sign in the provided attendance list and fill out the provided comments sheets. Mr. Chang continued with a presentation
of the proposed development including project analysis, neighbourhood context, and site planning and building design.
After the presentation the attendees were encouraged to express their comments and concerns on the proposed
development. The reception of the development in general was very positive. Please see below a summary of the only
concerns from the attendants.
Summary of the comments and concerns:
1. If the proposed new back lane continues through to the lane on the neighbouring property north of the
development, people could use this lane as a shortcut. Noise and safety issues are a concern.
Wilsons Respond: The Cone does not necessary need to go through to eliminate that concern. Or other steps
could be taken to reduce these concems, like speed bumps and only permitted access.
2. Planned entrance to the underground parking is very close to the next door property (north). Noise and
Pollution could come to adjacent units.
Wilsons Respond: There will be planting and fencing between the two properties to screen noise and pollution.
In addition there will be Trellis over the romp entrance to provide the best possible screening.
3. Building will block the view to the south for the neighbouring property on the north.
Wilsons Respond: It will also block the sound of the fire hall.
4. Building construction will be noisy to the neighbouring properties.
Wilson Respond: Construction will follow all city guidelines for safety and hours of operation.
Sincerely,
Wilson Chang
Page 01 I tkvcloprnent Information Meeting summary
N ilum Chang Architect Inc. MAIBC
District of Maple Ridge
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE:
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING:
SUBJECT: Development Permit
11580 223 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
September 12, 2011
DP/002/08
CofW
The application proposed to rezone the subject property from M-2 (General Industrial) and RS-1
(One Family Urban Residential) to CRM (Commercial/Residential), to permit development of a four
storey wood frame apartment building.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/002/08 respecting property located at
11580 223 Street.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Vincent Donegan
Owner: Axxia Management & Consulting Inc Vetta Enterprise
Legal Description: D.L.: 398, Plan: RP65880
OCP:
Existing: Commercial
Zoning:
Existing: M-2 (General Industrial), RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential)
Proposed: CRM (Commercial/Residential)
Surrounding Uses
North: Use:
Ministry of Transportation property & Single and Two
Family Dwelling
Zone:
RS-1(One Family Urban Residential), RT-1 (Two
Family Urban Residential)
Designation
Regional Town Centre Commercial
South: Use:
Single Family Dwellings and Commercial
Zone:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), H-1 (Heritage
Commercial), C-4 (Neighbourhood Public House
Commercial)
Designation:
Regional Town Centre Commercial
East: Use:
Ministry of Transportation property
Zone:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), M-1(Service
Industrial)
Designation:
Regional Town Centre Commercial
1103
West: Use:
Zone:
Designation
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
b) Project Description:
Single Family Dwellings and Townhomes
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), RM-1
(Townhouse Residential)
Regional Town Centre Commercial
Vacant
Apartment
0.200 HA (0.47 acres)
223 Street
Full Urban
RZ/002/08
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from M-2 (General Industrial) and
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to CRM (Commercial/Residential). The rezoning is to support a
51 unit 4 storey apartment building with underground parking.
c) Planning Analysis:
The property is subject to a Regional Town Centre Port Haney Development Permit.
The purpose of the Regional Town Centre Development Permit to establish guidelines is to direct
development in the Downtown to enhance business opportunities that contribute to community
identity while meeting the needs of those who work, shop and live in the area. The proposed
apartment building adds to the housing variety in the area and can support local commercial
businesses in the area. As this property is located within the Port Haney Area, the applicant has
utilized colours and materials that are suitable for this heritage area. The Key Guideline Concepts
are as follows:
1. Promote Port Haney and the Waterfront as an important heritage, tourism -oriented area.
This multi -family residential building will provide vibrancy to the area and will be highly visible
from the Haney Bypass. The project is located within walking distance of the Civic Core, the
waterfront and the West Coast Express station.
2. Provide a pedestrian -oriented, mixed use commercial and residential environment.
The proposal is for a ground oriented multi family building designed to promote a pedestrian
scale along the street
3. Enhance the heritage quality, character and vibrancy of Port Haney and the Waterfront.
An urban building is proposed with an attractive presence to the street. The proposed design
has taken account of the heritage character in the area and will add to the quality and
vibrancy of Port Haney.
4. Capitalize on important views.
The building has been oriented to provide views of the Fraser River to a number of units.
-2-
5. Provide outdoor space.
Landscaping elements have been included in the design to provide outdoor space for the
residents.
6. Provide climate appropriate landscaping and green features.
Significant landscaping within the site terracing will surround the site and provide onsite rain
water infiltration.
7. Maintain street interconnectivity.
Parking for this development will be located underground and will be accessed from the rear
lane. Street interconnectivity is maintained and pedestrian access is provided directly to
223rd Street.
d) Advisory Design Panel:
The Advisory Design Panel reviewed the current application on August 12, 2008. Below are the ADP
resolution items and a brief explanation as to how the applicant has addressed each item.
• Stair location and configuration to be better integrated into the landscape.
The stairs have been altered and blended into the landscaping.
• Vehicular drop-off should be higher quality surface and integrated into the building entry.
The drop-off area will be surfaced with pavers.
• Review of exterior materials to be simplified.
The materials and colours proposed are suitable for this heritage area.
• Proportion of the brackets to the fapade.
The brackets have been enlarged to make them more proportionate to the building.
• Treatment of railings on the building and the landscape.
The railings vary in height, which adds variety.
e) Financial Implications:
In accordance with Council's Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of
the estimated landscape cost will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on an estimated
landscape cost of $26,000.00, the security will be $26,000.00.
There will be street trees added to the municipal street tree inventory on completion of this project.
The costs associated with maintaining these trees will need to be included in a subsequent
operating budget.
f) Alternatives:
Under Section 919.1(d) of the Local Government Act and Section 8.11 of the Official Community
Plan the property has been designated a Development Permit Area with special requirements for
commercial development. Council approval is required for all Town Centre Development Permit
-3-
developments. Council can reject the Development Permit on the grounds that they feel the
Development Permit Guidelines have not been met.
CONCLUSION:
As the development proposal complies with the b Town Centre Development Permit Area guidelines
of the Official Community Plan for form and character, it is recommended that DP/002/08 be given
favourable consideration.
- ��A=fflv q I I � �
Prepared by: Sarah Atkinson
Planning Technician
e P1.ckerM9,' 4CP, MCIP
Dire o�nning
�� (<
Approved bye Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: 134blic Works & Developn)ent Services
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
Jr
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Site Plan
Appendix B - Elevations
Appendix C - Landscaping Plan
IIIIMI
tT
P11527
Rem
2
P 155
4 5 A
P 76188
N
N
CALLAGHAN AVE.
P 590 8
4
1 2 3 �, 31
� N N [NV
N
N
116 AVE.
Rem 128
18 cl N ' 15
IL
LMS 752 N � ss5ay
a
14
11575
P 765?9 era+on
N
�f N
o
M M M N C�C
N N N Cl- N J N
RP 53523
ST.ANNE AVE.
'n — APPENDIX A
rym
N z
P 668g
P 5871 L
116?2 3 LM
N 'PP 76
Rem
ry 17 N 112
18 16sq T RP 52214F
tts7t S 112
A31657 1}�6 T
RP 6192 RP 5637
neat
P 164 4 11650
Rem
N
d
N
N
C
tlssa �
�
22
�
21
�
20
n
19
11654
S Q
P1
5
P 82887
p
55
A
11
12
13
14
2
1
N
M
a
m
1
c]
NN
N
ry
N
N
PA
K
N
N
CALLAGHAN AVE.
2
rn
11s3p a
A
P 85354
a
::23
m a
NW$33
N 131
25 N
N
a
A
1
rn
4
�
a
nss7
Rem.
24
�1613
P 1S5
t�
W
N
22
tt56a Subject Property
ir 11612
729
RP 65880 Rem Rem
11sse
RP 6755
a 11 8
1i5�
Rem
10 Rem
r�
1'% (A P 9
rs5j 5g284
Rem 1
M
q n
a B
N
ry 112
P 86773
h Rem
=
RA21 N 113
Rem 1
_
RP �335 RP 460S
P
N R q P 1S654F
ASS
fi
L
0
P 4665
N M
�:
sk
48�g
District of
Pitt Meadows
r"
-
51WVallay
;
11580-223 St
0
I
IN
11 'j{ 0
�t
CORPORATION OF
i o
THE DISTRICT OF
N
Alhlun
•
ia�
MAPLE RIDGE
DIStfICt Of
Langley
�
��
� I
I
s
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
E 1:2,000
�
DATE: Jan 4, 2008 RZ/002/08 BY: JV
River
3os �Oo $���
gyp y¢� ¢gym =y3 m m &ergg 3'Q LL�y S ��pa�oi� 9 EVE r�� o i
o ow�� wmo�wot mF�>a pr_� Q
Rug 33-uFSim o ooa�' t g $ I P o?
w
�Zoo�oaa_««<o�6gaa�'" iE sxxsoaauad nnoso3mmEam UL3 �d
in �s 55 i Svc �_
u�B gSS a 34E �ba` ac
I
—NIL
0
0
m
A
I
I
�
I
0`
;o
r
I
d
n
W;o
I
I
Ud1m
EeE
�qNm
t»
�mra
d
3
n
5
� y
�
�
a
APPENDIX B
1
r3
APPENDIX C
�t! its i1 fill
�ji
pill
go Rik �)► i! fill � !f i!5
i@ fit11
lti�O���i���ddii
�!lflilfllisi
ke
i
MAPLE RIDGE
British Catumbia District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: September 12, 2011
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-103-DVP
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Cow
SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit
20683 Westfield Avenue
A Development Variance Permit application has been received to reduce the interior yard setbacks
for the property located at 20683 Westfield Avenue. The applicant has requested to reduce the
interior yard setbacks from 1.5 m to 1.2 m to the side faces of the building to allow the proposed
single family dwelling to fit on the existing narrow lot. An additional reduction in the interior side
setback is requested to accommodate the fireplace projection on the second level on the east
elevation of the building. The side setback from the fireplace projection to the interior side lot line
would be 0.9 m. The existing narrow lot is a legal, non -conforming lot that is zoned RT-1 (Two Family
Urban Residential); however, the lot is too narrow to accommodate a duplex. A single family dwelling
is also a permitted use in the RT-1 zone. A reduction in side yard setbacks is required to
accommodate a slightly wider home than what could be achieved without the variances. Such a
home would be more in character with the existing surrounding homes.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2011-103-DVP respecting the property
located at 20683 Westfield Avenue.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context
Applicant: Mark Wulf
Owner: Mark Wulf
Legal Description: Parcel "A" (M72812E) Lot 610, Distric Lot 278,
Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 114
OCP:
Existing: Urban Residential
Proposed: Urban Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RT-1(Two Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential)
Surrounding Uses
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-1 (Residential District)
Designation: Urban Residential
1104
South: Use:
Single Family Residential
Zone:
RS-1(One Family Urban Residential)
Designation:
Urban Residential
East: Use:
Duplex
Zone:
RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential)
Designation:
Urban Residential
West: Use:
Single Family Residential
Zone:
RS-1(One Family Urban Residential)
Designation:
Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Previous Applications:
Requested Variance:
b) Project Description:
Vacant
Single Family Residential
340 m2 (3660 ft2)
Westfield Avenue
Full urban servicing to be provided
SD/041/97, SD/008/89
Section 601 B. (3) (c) (ii) To vary the interior side
setback from 1.5 m to 1.2 m, and to 0.9 m to
accommodate the fireplace projection on the upper
floor of the east elevation.
This existing legal non -conforming lot is approximately 340 m2 (3660 ft2) and is approximately 9.1 m
(30 ft) wide and approximately 37.2 m (122 ft) long. The property is zoned RT-1 (Two Family Urban
Residential); however, the lot is too small to accommodate a duplex. A single family dwelling is
proposed with reduced interior side yard setbacks to accommodate a slightly wider house.
d) Requested Variances to Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw:
Section 601B (3)(c)(ii) states that buildings and structures for One Family Residential use shall be
sited not less than a minimum of 1.5 m from an interior side lot line, but with the sum of the two
interior side yards to be not less than 3.5 m.
The requested variance is to reduce the interior side setback from 1.5 m to 1.2 m. An additional
reduction in the setback is requested for the fireplace projection on the upper floor of the east
elevation. This setback would be reduced to 0.9 m for a length of approximately 1.5 m (5 ft).
c) Planning Analysis:
The existing homes on either side of the property appear to be set back sufficiently so that even with
the reduction in the side yard setback, the sum of the two interior side yards for either side would not
be less than the required 3.5 m.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
The Fire Department has indicated that if an underground oil tank is found onsite, a permit from the
Fire Department will be required to have it removed.
The Building Department has indicated that revisions will be required to the attached building plans
to reduce the number of windows on the east elevation and to remove the suite from the lower floor
-2-
plan. They have also advised that a geotechnical and hydrological report and a Floodplain covenant
will be required at the Building Permit Stage.
f) Alternatives:
If this variance is not approved, the applicant would need to alter the building plans for this home to
ensure it would fit within the required setbacks of the RT-1 zone.
CONCLUSIONS:
The proposed side yard setback variances have been reviewed with respect to zoning, building and
engineering requirements and no concerns were noted. It is therefore recommended that Council
approve Development Variance Permit 2011-103-VP.
Prepared by: Michelle Bast, AScT
Planning Technician
Approved by: Jgrr16 Pickering, MCP, MCIP
pif -or Plan
Approved Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng
/( GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Site Plan and Elevations
-3-
11509
11534
22
11522
F21 Lo
2
20
LM 4182 11499
27
11502
7
8�
9 10 11
LO T N 12
11493
1
77
A9�,
0 r r
r
26
11494
6
r
�� 5
� °`
11489
2
13 25
11484
11491
DARTFORD
ST.
11534
r- 11485
3
5
cV
00 24
11474
11489
ryS2
14 N
T
4
i
'sj 4
00 "t 11481
4
cmcm
11487
1508
a 23
11464
�t
17 16 15
11454
3
_I 11475
5
11485
22
2
11483
18
1 SUBJECT PROPERTY
11444 6
1
F
U)
0
11466 LMP 1
11482 19
11465
---}
11440
11481
0
1
P 114 1
o 611
Co
603 604 605 606 0 607 608 609 0) M 2
C\j LO CY)111460
M(0 (D (0 � (D � �
O O NN N T U
NoN O
m N
'044
`*
N
CD
11429
O
N
CD
N
N
628
i
627
624
623
114
629
626
625
622
co
Np
C\jO
N
11391
N
N SK 492
Cl)
4 ❑
691 692 695 0
N
SCALE 1:1,500
District of
Langley {�
11430
�
^
�
11431
N P
14 N
N
620
619
616
615
612
621
618
617
11417
M 846
114
0
� 11407
L *
to (D
I-
a_847
N
N
N
*PP044
m
LO
'
A
o
(
w 11391
N rn
N o
ifl
696
(0
sT _.
- APPENDIX A
P 76417
24
LO
25
26o
N
23114
9
11N�N
5A
114�
12
co 11485
C/)
13P11475
9
11470
11465
11455
11 4
8
11
7 11445 1
P 77490
m 2
a
B
P 7363
0 1
N P 709 3 2
11428
0
N
O
N
A
11410
P
10557
P10601
1
2
17
18
N
co
n
�
0
0
N
N
N
114 AVE.
� m N
14 N 13 N 12 N 11
P j.064
20683 WESTFIELD AVENUE
ajT Li
- - L
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
I❑ MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Aug 25, 2011 FILE: 2011-103-VP BY: PC
1
OE SZ99-ZV6-409 '000 'Id 133Z11S 3nSIA d L9ZZ 9S#
SNOIIVA0N3a1 V SNOIS34 SHOH WOISf1O
H '011 SNOIS30 31N0H NOIV3
wU
Nm
H
I
N pip �W�I �j g Ha
COW €LL 4
jgip
Am g
M 'a $eo ' 8 E j
3cea3 �5'��a G`andHab9:b ; d:e
� E E
I
r
j'
I
Qii
TKA
hie
�p
1Q
�0 "a0
W
APPENDIX B
I-z,
�.
e
P,
�L
�m
District of Maple Ridge
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: September 12, 2011
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Council Resolution to Release Landscape Buffer Restrictive Covenant
24730-24790 102A Avenue.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A request has been generated from one of the affected property owners in a neighbourhood where a
landscape buffer restrictive covenant has been placed on title. The subject properties are north of
the Upper Jackson Farm property which recently completed a rezoning application to urban
residential uses. The original intent of the covenant was to provide a buffer interface between an
urban subdivision and what was expected to be large rural lots to the South. However, the southern
site was recently rezoned to urban residential densities under Rezoning Application RZ/040/09.
Given these changed circumstances, it appears that the buffer is no longer relevant. As a condition
of this rezoning application, a separation will be maintained with the provision of a landscape buffer
on the south side. This request for release has been circulated to the affected property owners for
their comment. To date, no concerns have been expressed.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Landscape Buffer Restrictive Covenant BX528664 be released.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Existing:
Zoning:
Existing:
Surrounding Uses
North: Use:
Zone:
Designation
South: Use:
Zone:
Designation
East: Use:
Zone:
District of Maple Ridge
Lots 1-7 Section: 3, Township: 12, Plan:
BCP17387
Low -Medium Residential
SRS Special Urban Residential
Urban Residential
SRS Special Urban Residential
Low -Medium Residential
vacant
RS-1 One Family Urban Residential and R-1
Special Residential
Urban Residential
Farm and rural residential
A-1 Small Holding Agricultural
1105
Designation
West: Use:
Zone:
Designation
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Access:
b) Project Description
Urban Reserve
Park and Conservation
P-1 Park and School Institutional & M-2 General
Industrial
Park and Conservation
Urban Residential
No Change
102 A Avenue
This request for a covenant release was generated from a property owner who is affected by the
covenant and wishes to use the covenanted area for personal use. It appears from a review of this
application that the covenant was registered by the developer at the time of subdivision. The
covenant is a tree and vegetative cover protection covenant which appears to be intended to protect
the property to the south from this higher density development.
c) Planning Analysis:
Typically, buffers are used to provide an attractive interface between different land uses, especially
where one use is vulnerable to intrusion or interference by another. For example, in the Maple Ridge
Zoning Bylaw, the M-2 General Industrial Zone is required to provide a landscape screen of 2 meters
in height and 2 meters in width along any lot line that abuts properties designated commercial,
residential, or agricultural.
As the entire area will become residential development in the near future, the landscape buffer does
not appear to be particularly useful or relevant, As the recently rezoned Jackson Farm property to
the south will be of higher density in the future than_ these covenanted properties are, there is no
apparent benefit to provide a buffer between these similar uses.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The notification process for this application has been through a letter sent to the affected property
owners. The property owners have been requested to voice their concerns and state possible
objections to the proposed covenant release with a deadline of September 1, 2011. To date, no
property owners have responded.
If Council agrees to the authorization of this release, property owners will be required to apply
individually for the removal of the covenant from their properties. This step would be required prior
to the issuance of a building permit in the covenanted area. Council authorization allows this
removal to occur as an administrative process through the Development Agreement Committee. No
further approvals would be required.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
As this initial step in having the covenant removed would be through a building permit application.
This application will mostly involve the Building Department,
f) Alternatives:
Council has the option of denying this request from proceeding further if desired. In most instances,
a covenant is registered as a condition of rezoning or of subdivision, and a Public Hearing can be
required in order to release it. However, in this case, the covenant appears to have been registered
voluntarily by the property owner at the time, and there is no apparent legal impediment should
Council wish to remove it. The purpose of the neighbor notification process was to allow Council to
make their decision after receiving responses from within the community. To date, none have been
received.
CONCLUSION:
This application for a covenant release is justified on the basis that the covenanted landscape buffer
no longer appears to serve a useful purpose. Neighbours have been notified, and no responses
have been received. One this basis, the recommendation is that Council authorize the release to
proceed.
Prepared by: Diana Hall
Planner 2
Approved by: Jane Pickering, MCP, MCIP
Dir 7 f Plan g
}
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Covenant
Appendix C -Jackson Farm proposed subdivision plan
Appendix D - Sample letter sent to property owners
BCP 23574
16
10295
U)
APPENDIX A
14
00
N
15
13
Ln Ln
n m
24j6S
n n
N c`r�t
P 64
85
12
2q)S
11
S
25
4S
2g�S2
10
o�
24j3s
�UQ
BCP 17387
9
27
26
33
24,�5
v
N
v
(V
8
24720
102AAVE.
--
Subject Properties
0 0co r,
N
0
7 a LO
N
N
LO
LO
y.
6 5 N
4 3
2
1
N
BCP 1
87
PARK
CI f Pitt
Mea ows
- _ I
-- - - = ' 0
Landscape Covenant Release
CORPORATION OF
=-
THE DISTRICT OF
N
District of
e MAPLE RIDGE
Langley
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Jun 23, 2011 FILE: Untitled BY: JV
SCALE 1:1,750
__�� - T,�
ERASER R.
APPENDIX B
Part 2 - Annexed Terms
Page 4 of 7
COVENANT
No Building in Covenant Area - Non Disturb
(Section 219 Land Title Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 250 }
This Covenant made as of the 20th day of April , A.D. 2005
BETWEEN:
497308 B.C. Ltd. (Incorporation No. 497308)
4038 - 200B Street, Langley, B.C. V3A 1 N9
(as to Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 7)
Craig Sandford Redmond, Businessman, of
11550 - 238A Street, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 783 (Lot 6)
Jennifer Camilla Redmond, Businesswoman, of
11414 Creekside Street, Maple Ridge, B.C.V3W 2A4 (Lots)
(Hereinafter called the "Owner)
AND:
OF THE FIRST PART
THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE
RIDGE . a Municipal Corporation under the "Local
Government Act ", and having offices at 11995 Haney Place,
Maple Ridge, British Columbia V2X 6A9
(Hereinafter called the "District")
OF THE SECOND PART
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE
1294 Guildford Town Centre, Surrey, B.C. V313 7137
Hereinafter called the "Mortgage Company")
WHEREAS:
OF THE THIRD PART
A. The Owner is the registered owner of or has an equity of redemption in ALL AND
SINGULAR that certain parcel or tract of land and premises situate, lying and being In the
District of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more particularly known
and described as follows:
NO PID Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Section 3 Townshi 1
New Westminster District Plan BCP
(hereinafter called the " Land2l-----
B. Section 219 of the Land Title Actprovides, inter alia, that a covenant, whether of a
negative or positive nature, in respect of use of land in favour of the District may be
registered as a charge against the title to that land;
KtU1J4tKtU NWbX:>.:?Sbb4 KLVU:LUUS-U}-US KtD1:LU11-U5-US-LU.S6.1b.Z14
page 5 of 7
NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH THAT pursuant to Section
219 of the Land Title Act, and in consideration of ONE ($1.00) DOLLAR now paid to the
Owner by the District, ( the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged) the Owner covenants
and agrees with the District as follows
1. in this Agreement "Covenant Area" means all that poiton of the Lands shown
outlined in heavy dark line on Explanatory Plan BCP i a copy of which is
attached hereto as Schedule "A".
2. The Covenant Area is to be protected, preserved and kept in its natural state to the
extent provided in this Agreement
3. The Owner covenants and agrees that:
(a) all those areas of the Lands shown v4jdatlaErQygLn are vegetation
---aritt tree p7ae o6gEas and shaft -remain free of development, and shall not
be built upon.
(b) There will be a post and rail fence constructed along the Covenant Area
boundary to identify the area to be protected.
(c) Cutting, pruning or removal of any tree w' in the Ill require
a Certified Arbodst Report contain►ng the ra n as to the need for e
proposed tree cutting activity, and shall not engage in such proposed activity
without first =approval from tha DIstr4 and shall then pursue such
activity only ance with such terms, condWris and restrictions as may
be imposed pursuant to such approval.
(d) The Owner shall do or cause to be done all such things, and shall take ar
cause to be taken all such actions as are necessary to ensure that the
restrictions provided in subparagraphs (a (b) and (c) of this paragraph are
fully observed, and the Owner shall not do, cause or allow to be done
anything, undertake, cause or allow to be undertaken any work, or construct,
place, improve, or cause or allow to be constructed, placed or improved any
building structure or thing that would be in breach of the aforesaid restrictions.
4. No buildings, accessory buildings or structures shall be erected or placed, nor shall
any landfill, land clearing or other disturbance take place within the Covenant Area.
5. Nothing contained or implied herein shall prejudice or affect the rights and powers of
the District in the exercise of Its functions under any public of private statutes, bylaws,
orders and regulations, all of which may be fully and effectively exercised in relation to the
Lands as if this Agreement had not been executed and delivered to the Owner.
6. The covenants set forth herein shall charge the Lands pursuant to Section 219 of the
Land Tithe Act; and shall be covenants, the burden of which shaft run with the Lands. it is
further expressly agreed that this Agreement may only be modified or discharge by
agreement of the District pursuant to the provisions of Section 219 (9) of the Land Tide Act,
7. Notwithstanding anything contained herein, the Owner shall not be liable under any
of the covenants and agreements contained herein where such liability arises by reason of
an act or omission occurring after the Owner ceased to have any further interest In the Lands.
S. The parties herein covenant and agree that the restrictions herein contained shall be
covenants running with the lands and shall be perpetual.
page 6of7
9. Wherever the singular or masculine is used herein, the same shall be construed as
meaning the plural, feminine or body corporate or politic, where the contents or parties so
require.
10. The parties shall do and cause to be done all such things and execute and cause to
be executed all documents which may be necessary to give proper effect to the intention
of this Agreement.
11. The Owner hereby releases, indemnifies and saves harmless the District, its elected
and appointed officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all liability,
actions, causes of actions, claims, damages, expenses, costs, debts, demands or losses
suffered or incurred by the District arising from the granting or existence of this Agreement,
from the performance by the Owner of this Agreement or any default of the Owner under or
in respect of this Agreement.
12. The Owner hereby covenants and agrees with the District that the District is not
required or is under no obligation in law or equity to prosecute or enforce this Agreement in
any way whatsoever.
13, The Owner hereby releases, indemnifies and saves the District harmless from and
against any and all actions, causes of action, losses, damages, costs, claims, debts and
demands whatsoever by any person, arising out of or in any way due to the granting or
existence or enforcement of this Covenant; and
14. The Owner covenants and agrees to obtain from any prospective purchaser,
leaseholder, tenant and other transferee of the Lands referred to herein, an agreement to be
bound by the terms of this Agreement.
15. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the respective
parties hereto, their heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns.
16. The Mortgage Company in consideration of the payment of One Dollar ($1.00) and
other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged) hereby agrees and consents to the registration of the Covenant herein
granted under Section 219 of the Land Title Act, running with the said La' n-dg-an?"against the
said Lands in priority to the said Mortgage Company Document(s) registered under
numbers BW583168 and BW583169 as extended by BX5a85 and
BX- a8 'J in the same manner and to the same effect as if itfthey had been dated,
granted and registered prior to the Mortgage Document(s).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective
corporate seals attested by the hands of its respective officers duly authorized in that
behalf, the day and year first above written.
KtUi3l tf(tU {V YMCS.1�LdbbY KlL`U :.:VVj-U}-VS KCj�I :LV11-V�-V S-GU.5d.1b.L14
page 7 of 7
Schedule "A"
r3_�i
_=ess
m
0
• N
z z a r- m
rn r o x
^�
a
e N r
-
-rL
mTI.. z
En
Da
x�
.1.`.VeOi!
,c:
m rn a o
S8F
ro 30 `w li
i
¢
«
1•-i i-i m
a�
�mzzr
"Xw
z
.8
c tea.
a
a Zno
i
to .+
<
gY
8
dK
I m z m-0
FN
,
z
z
D IU U)
_
:Z
m
* 1
V 4•
z
CD
�%
Z
r
N
'
m
=
e
- � rr• K. �
9.iN a k. ,
y
n
r y
I
VI
a
r"
IL ` D
I i
�
. q.
QQ
o.a „- ,.n..
Ic
:Y�3
g = -
248th STREET
o
c
r
Z
END OF DOCUMENT
r�
r0711150 OAPtAjLXT WEAN APPENDIX
least
will
'C.
�CicfT' L
r-%-� -;5Zod`
toe
o �i�- t.01r+
%A!7 l r
IvIT-T
IZ- t upve7
%Aa11G%,4a-(
L L v
T �
co
O^ N
3�
cc � @�
>cc
U
c -a
V� >
(L)�
oc
U m�
rX
cc
x 3^
c O N
O �
O
� N
cc th N
O
APPENDIX D
August 8, 2011
((owner 1» «owner_2»
«addresslinel»
,,addressline2,,
Dear «owner 1» ((owner 2» :
Re: Request for release of landscape buffer restrictive covenant BX528664.
A request has been generated from one within your neighbourhood for the release if a landscape
buffer restrictive covenant which has been placed on title of the properties with addresses as
follows: 24730-24790 102A Avenue. The original intent of the covenant was to provide a buffer
interface between an urban subdivision and what was expected to be large rural lots to the
South. As the southern site was recently rezoned to urban residential densities, it appears that
the buffer is no longer relevant.
The anticipated date for the Council decision about the authorization of this release is the
September 13, 2011 Council meeting. To assist Council in making this decision, the affected
property owners are requested to express comments and concerns prior to September 1, 2011.
This input may be provided by email to dhall@mauleridge.ca or written letter to City Hall.
If Council agrees to the authorization of this release, property owners will be required to apply
individually for the removal of the covenant from their properties. This step would be required
prior to the issuance of a building permit in the covenanted area. Council authorization allows
this removal to occur as an administrative process at the staff level. No further approvals would
be required. Please contact Diana Hall at 604-467-7402 should you require more information.
Yours truly,
Diana Hall
Planner 2
Writer's Initials:Typist's Initials
Encl.
cc:
District of Maple Ridge
MAPLE RIDGE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: September 12, 2011
and Members of Council FILE NO: E05-010-127
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Contract No. ITT-EN10-171 Amendment for road reconstruction
River Road Drainage Improvements (Darby Street to Carshill Street)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In 2010, Council awarded the River Road Drainage Improvements contract to Double M Excavating
Ltd. The project consists of a storm trunk sewer, storm sewer outfall in a ravine and replacement of
a section of 45 year old sanitary sewer pipe.
As a result of tendered prices, the project budget required additional funds to repave the road. The
strategy chosen to advance the project was based on the expected phasing of construction and that
paving would occur in 2011 rather than 2010. On that basis, Council awarded the contract to Double
M Excavating Ltd. in the amount of $2,454,227.06 plus taxes, and did not include the optional road
reconstruction component because of the 2010 funding envelope.
Subsequently, Council approved the addition of $300,000 (in the 2011 Capital Works Program) to
the budget to allow the existing road surface and base of River Road to be reconstructed following
the storm and sanitary sewer installation. The then expected cost of the road reconstruction was
approximately $500,000.
The sewer installation on River Road has been completed and the gravel road base and first layer of
asphalt has been installed to address the need to provide a non -gravel road traveling surface. In
order to complete the rest of the road surface, Council approval is requested to amend the existing
contract. The work will be completed within the approved budgets.
As a note, a meeting with residents was held on August 16 at which a number of issues (including
those to be addressed subsequent to the construction of the sewer) were raised to staff. Staff is
reviewing the issues and will be submitting a report at an upcoming Council Workshop meeting.
f:�K� ►d►d�►1�k��[�l►A
THAT Contract No. ITT-EN10-171; River Road Drainage Improvements (Darby Street to Carshill
Street), awarded to Double M Excavating Ltd., be increased by $563,080.95 (plus applicable taxes).
1106
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
In 2010, Council awarded the River Road Drainage Improvements contract to Double M
Excavating Ltd. The original tendered price was for approximately $3 million which included
approximately $500,000 for optional pavement rehabilitation and road improvements (a
gravel shoulder).
Based on the then available budgets, the Council awarded a contract to Double M Excavating
Ltd. in the amount of $2,454,227.06 (plus taxes), which did not include the optional road
reconstruction component because of the funding limitations in 2010.
To address the need for additional funds required to complete the road reconstruction,
Council approved $300,000 within the 2011 Capital Works Program to increase the overall
River Road Drainage Improvements project budget.
The road reconstruction currently planned consists of reconstructing the existing two travel
lanes that are 3.3 m wide and a 0.8 m paved shoulder on the north side, constructing
asphalt curbs for drainage, and a 0.9 m gravel path on the south side.
The sewer installation on River Road has been completed and the initial gravel road base
and first asphalt layer has been installed to address the need to provide a non -gravel road
surface.
As such, staff is seeking Council approval to increase the Double M Excavating Ltd. contract
by $563,080.95 to $3,017,308.01 (plus taxes) to complete the paving. This work amount is
still within the approved budgets.
b) Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome is to obtain Council approval to complete the final paving of River Road.
c) Strategic Alignment:
River Road is an important road in the District's transportation network and ensuring that the
road is in good condition is in alignment with the District's Strategic Plan.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Engineering Department staff has been informing local residents on the progress of the
project and will continue to inform them as the project completes.
e) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
In late 2010, when Council recognized the need to increase the approved project budgets to
fully fund the repaving of River Road, they approved the addition of $300,000 in the 2011
Capital Works Program (under LTC 8469 - River Road Reconstruction) to increase the total
budget for the project.
In sum, the total approved budgets will be sufficient for the River Road Drainage
Improvements Project including the completion of the road reconstruction and the
installation of the sanitary sewer.
CONCLUSIONS:
The sewer installations on River Road have been completed and the approved 2011 Capital Program
includes the additional funding necessary for the road reconstruction.
To provide a smooth and reliable road surface, staff is requesting Council approval to increase the
Double M Excavating Ltd. contract for the River Road Drainage Improvements Project.
Prepared by: Richar ong
Manager Design d Construction
Financial review by: Trevor hompson, CGA
Man r of Financial Planning
Reviewed by: drew Wood, PhD., PEng.
'unicipal Engine
Approved by: % Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
General Manager: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
Summer Market - September
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
MEETING DATE: September 12, 2011
FILE NO: E01-035-001
MEETING: C of W
A request has been received from the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association
(BIA) to use the area of 224 Street known "Spirit Square" for their Summer Market on Saturday,
September 24, 2011, from 8:00 am to 2:00 pm. Because of the construction currently underway,
the BIA would like to hold the event on Spirit Square and as such, a road closure is required for this
event. A map is attached.
There will be three events taking place in the Spirit Square area on September 24, 2011. They are
the Haney Farmers Market, GETI Fest and Summer Market 2. GETI Fest and Haney Farmers Market
have been previously approved by Council and they are supportive of the BIA's request to host the
Summer Market 2. Organizers of each event have met to help and coordinate with each other. The
BIA Summer Market and Haney Farmers Market events will end at 2:00 pm with vendors dispersing
by 3:00 pm. This will permit 30 minutes for the changeover of barricades and access by event
volunteers wearing safety vests. RCMP Auxiliary will be in attendance to provide some assistance.
Authorization from Council is requested to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the Summer Market on Sunday, September 24,
2011, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule 'A' attached to the staff report dated September
12, 2011 are met.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for
organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually
given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability for injury or
damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as
Schedule 'A.'
Due to construction on the District's property adjacent to 224 Street, south of Memorial
Peace Park, the Summer Market event organizer is requesting permission to close the area
of 224 Street known as "Spirit Square", for events to coincide with the Haney Farmer's
Market, on Saturday September 24, 2011, from 8:00 am to 3:00 pm. The event is
scheduled from 8:00 am to 2:00 pm.
1107
There will be manned barricades set up at each end of the bricked Spirit Square roadway.
Haney Place road surrounding Memorial Peace Park will remain open.
b) Strategic Alignment:
Permitting of Maple Ridge street events promotes community development and often
highlights Maple Ridge's natural and built features.
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets may cause some delays and inconveniences to other
road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the Summer Market organizers.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain approval of the RCMP
and Fire Department for traffic control and must notify BC Ambulance Services as well as
coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company.
e) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal
streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff
processing effort.
f) Policy Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices.
g) Alternatives:
The District could refuse to permit the run to occur. In this event, the organizer would have
to cancel the event.
CONCLUSIONS:
From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events
and activities. The first Summer Market was held in Maple Ridge in August of this year without
incident. I
Submitted by: Andrew Wood, PhD., PEng.
Municipal Engineer �
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, Pf -
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J.L (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
AW/ml
Schedule'A' To Council Memorandum Dated S m r 12 2011
Summer Market - September
Conditions of Approval
Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers:
1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the
RCMP, Fire Department and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District);
2. notify local Ambulance Services of the event;
3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses;
4. obtain any required permits from the District of Maple Ridge Parks and Leisure Services
Department for park facility use;
5. make arrangements for all surrounding businesses and residents for access purposes
during the event;
6. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of
the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date);
7. must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times.
8. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out
of or in any way connected with the event;
9. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability
insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have
the following statement written in the policy:
"Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy
shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in
writing to the District."
Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy
shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the
Corporate Officer prior to the event; and
10. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which
existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of
the District.
The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw permission to use
municipal streets for this and future events should the organizers fail to comply with the above
requirements.
Chief Administrative Officer
vJ
r• W
j 0 1010 =
Business improvement Association
c
#34 - 22374 Lougheed Highway, Maple Ridge B.C. V2X 2T5
Phone 604-467-2420 / Fax 604-467-2421
AUG
Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association
Attn. Ineke Boekhorst
#34 22474 Lougheed Highway
Maple Ridge, BC V2X 2T5
Phone: 604-467-2420 Fax: 604-467-2421
Email: inekebei�downtownmapleridge.ca
To:
District of Maple Ridge
Ridge Meadows Detachment RCMP
Maple Ridge Fire Department
To whom it may concern,
August 29, 2011
Hereby, please accept our request for use of Spirit Square, adjacent to Memorial Peace Park for a September
24th, 2011 BIA Summer Market, in conjunction with the Haney Farmers Market...
Road closure is requested for Saturday September 24, 8am - 3 pm
Please find attached map indicating proposed closure and safety precautions.
Emergency access through Memorial Peace Park, 119"' and McIntosh, as indicated on map.
Please advise, if any additional information is required.
Please inform Ruby Tam at the District of Maple Ridge Engineering Department directly of your approval.
Thank You,
Kind regards,
Ineke Boekhorst -- a
Director Maple Ridge Caribbean Festival Society
Executive Director Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association.
ExecutiveDirector(ccDowntownMa IeRid e.ca
Web: www.DowntownMapleRidge.ca
22362 Lougheed Hwy
Phone: 604-467-2420
Fax: 604-467-2421
Mailing address: PO Box 530, Maple Ridge, BC, V2X 3P2
Ineke Boekhorst email: Executive Di rector@DowntownMap leRidge.ca
Website: www.Downtown Maple Ridge. ca
5
RECEIVED 08/29/2011 10:29 6044672421 DMRBIA
AUG-29-2011 11:28 Engineering Copy 604 467 7425 P.002
FORM `A'
Details of the Even Date: :20 2011
Contact Person: 7 dz6cLLPhone _i 6�--g x � / .
Sketch of Traffic Control Plan:
ht I - de:,,L;Uc�c�
RCMP concurrence for the proposed Traffic Control Plan:
�y ;
z CL l (
�iGu1C� _ CC51itJG c?C�
Fire Dept. concurrence for the proposed Traffic Control Plan;
2r4r
•2G I
The following agencies have been advised and acknowledge the event:
Coast Mountain Bus Company: 2 -4� r r_ilaci 6 'V - 3� a
Ambulance Services: Ru5 2,9 flkisd tc� 6-r.,I ca
Other: Hcrr-i.s � Le.;6[ nsiai r Q 11) fcf,,-Y7 .
TOTAL P.002
RECEIVED 08/29/2011 10:29 6044672421 DMRBIA
AUG-29-2011 11:28 Engineering Copy 604 467 7425 P.002
A� i r 81 1 '
Date: ,2C 20 l l
Contact Person: _ nn a �c-1r 4 Phone �7 Fax
■ fi�:_ _ ! a ■ l Rr R•
Sketch of Traffic Control Plan:
RCMP concurrence for the proposed Traffic Control Plan: :29 j -iL l l
1x:j�d-deAi%1C; 4j Fire Dept. concurrence for the proposed Traffic Control Plan; [ f
,7
The following agencies have been advised and acknowledge the event:
Coast Mountain Bus Company: JgQ5 zcj : r� rlerj dccl � 3�a�i
Ambulance Services: IgU5 2cf
Other: Alarrls � L6_
TOTAL P.002
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE:
and Members of Council FILE NO:
Chief Administrative Officer MEETING:
Drinking Water Quality Report 2010
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
September 12, 2011
E03-012-001
CofW
The District of Maple Ridge operates a water utility under permit by the Fraser Health Authority (FHA).
The District's Operating Permit for the Municipal Waterworks System requires that an annual report
be prepared and submitted to the Fraser Health Authority and be available to the public. The report
follows the format required by the Fraser Health Authority and is necessarily a largely technical
report. To assist the general public, a less technical brochure has been produced and will be
available on the website and at the Municipal Hall Customer Service Centre.
The report, as attached includes an outline of the regulatory framework and water quality monitoring
data for 2010 and explanatory comments on the data. A copy of the report will be placed in the
public library and on the corporate website as part of the public information strategy.
In 2010, the District purchased 11.2 million cubic meters of water from the Greater Vancouver
Water District (GVWD), (a decrease of 7% from 2009). During the year, the Utility's water quality met
microbiological standards.
RECOMMENDATION:
This report is submitted for information.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The District operates a water utility under the provisions of the Local Government Act
(Provincial), and under permit by the Provincial Ministry of Health Services - Fraser Health
Authority. Water quality requirements are stipulated by the Drinking Water Protection
Regulations and administered by the FHA.
The District, as a distributor and purveyor of water, is reliant on the GVWD for source water
quality control. Treated water is delivered to the District by the GVWD via the Maple Ridge
Main and 248 Street Reservoir. While Coquitlam Lake is the primary source of water
delivered to Maple Ridge, the GVWD has the capability to transfer water from the Seymour
and Capilano sources and maintain supply to Maple Ridge in the event of disruptions at
Coquitlam Lake.
1108
The District's drinking water system operating permit requires an annual water quality
monitoring program and that an annual report be prepared and submitted. While the
monitoring program provides a representative picture of drinking water quality in the system
and within municipal mains, it does not provide a definite picture of drinking water quality
within buildings, where water quality can change significantly due to pipe materials, standing
times, temperature, and other factors. It can be assumed that samples taken within
buildings may be of different quality than those taken from sites on municipal mains.
The District's water distribution infrastructure includes 376 km of watermain, over 18,000
connections, 7 pump stations, 6 reservoir sites, and 5 re -chlorination stations.
Samples from 18 locations in the distribution system are taken weekly and are analyzed by
Metro Vancouver. The results are sent to the Operations and Engineering Departments and
to the FHA.
The total number of samples having a heterotrophic plate count (HPC) of 500 CFU/ml or
greater in 2010 was 1, equal to the 1 in 2009. No samples tested positive for E. coli, and no
samples exceeded the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation Microbiological Standard of
10 Total Coliforms per 100mL.
b) Strategic Alignment:
Financial Management
Council has directed that the Municipality provide high quality municipal services to our
citizens and customers in a cost effective and efficient. The annual water quality monitoring
program is intended to ensure that the water delivered by the District's utility is of high
quality.
Smart Managed Growth
The Corporate Strategic Plan directs that municipal infrastructure be protected and managed
through the preparation of appropriate plans to ensure maintenance of the system. A
systematic water quality monitoring plan assists in ensuring that an effective water
distribution system is managed and maintained.
Intergovernmental Relations/Partnerships
Council has directed that the District develop and maintain strong positive working
relationships with the GVWD and other governmental agencies.
Strong working relationships with the GVWD and FHA is required to ensure the quality of
water. The annual program and report facilitates an effective relationship.
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Maple Ridge water utility customers expect that the investment in the network be maintained
to provide safe, reliable and high quality water. The annual reporting of water quality is a
means to meet the accountability that customers expect from a utility. Ongoing
improvements by Metro Vancouver will continue to improve regional water quality.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
As part of the Public Works and Development Services Division, the Engineering and
Operations Departments collaborate in the water utility's planning, management, operation
and maintenance and water quality reporting to meet customer water quality objectives.
e) Policy Implications:
The reporting of water quality is consistent with the public policy approach of transparency
and accountability was well as meeting the requirements of the FHA.
CONCLUSIONS:
Water quality in Maple Ridge was generally good in 2010 and consistent with previous years. For
2010, the Utility's water quality met microbiological standards.
Prepared by: drew Wood, PhD., PEng.
nicipa Engine
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
General Manager: Public Works & Development Services
1.
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim)"Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
AW/mi
MMIRIWRRMI
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
Local Newspaper Advertising
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
MEETING DATE: September 12, 2011
FILE NO: RFP-AD11-29
MEETING: Committee of the Whole
On June 17, 2011 the District of Maple Ridge sent a Request for Proposals (RFP) for advertising
services and posted the information on the District website and BCBid. Proposals from the Maple Ridge
and Pitt Meadows News and the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Times were received. Both proposals
were reviewed and it is recommended that a one year contract with an option to renew for two
consecutive one year terms be awarded to the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows News. The proposal
stipulates that the District reserves the right to place advertising in the other publication at its discretion
if it necessary.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That a contract be awarded to the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows News for all regular and local
advertising for a period of one year with an option to renew the contract for two consecutive one year
periods and the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The District regularly conducts competitive processes to award contracts for set periods of time.
Staff reviewed and evaluated the proposals received from the two proponents.
The District annual spending on local advertising, excluding larger specialty publications and
brochures, is approximately $60,000. This includes statutory advertising related to the legislative
process, advertising for programs and general information to engage citizens, and other general
advertising related to business operations of the District. The RFP indicated that the District
reserves the right to place advertising in other publications in addition to the advertising in the
successful proponent.
b) Alternatives:
There has been some discussion in the past about advertising in both of the major local
newspapers. The position of the District has been to advertise statutory and non statutory ads in
one paper. The main reason and the prime consideration for the approach is to keep the cost of
advertising to a reasonable level.
As Council is aware, more and more of the public are accessing information on-line and there is less
reliance on the paper media as an information source.
It is still however important to continue with newspaper advertising for legal requirements as well as
to meet the needs of individuals who do not access the internet. We want to be assured that all
1109
citizens have access via various media to the necessary information on the District's programs,
services and notices.
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
It is believed that the advertising approach being recommended best meets the needs of the
citizens and the District in making the appropriate information available to the public.
d) Policy Implications:
The contract will be reviewed on an annual basis.
CONCLUSIONS:
It is recommended that the advertising contract be awarded to the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows News
as set out in this report.
Prepared by: Daniela Mikes
M, er of RhocurQme
Reviewed by: F� Armstr LZ+
M rjager Co porate un tions
I
L
Approved b : Frank Quinn
ager: Public
General ManW-�rks &Development Services
Concurrence: J.L. (Jimj Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
dm
-
District of Maple Ridge
MAPLE
WATsh
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE:
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Disbursements for the month ended July 31, 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
September 12, 2011
Council has authorized all voucher payments to be approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor and a
Finance Manager. Council authorizes the vouchers for the following period through Council resolution.
The disbursement summary for the past period is attached for information. Expenditure details are
available by request through the Finance Department.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the "disbursements as listed below for the month ended July 31, 2011 now be approved".
GENERAL $ 23,683,761
PAYROLL $ 2,417,160
PURCHASE CARD $_ 104,834
1M7_�5-
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and
provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services.
The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan.
b) Community Communications:
The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial
disbursements.
1131
c) Business Plan / Financial Implications:
Hi hIights of larder items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution
• BC Hydro - electricity charges July & one June invoice
$
167,023
• Double M Excavating Ltd. - River Road drainage improvements
$
1,044,187
• Double M Excavating Ltd. - sanitary sewer extension to Corrections
$
835,771
• Emergency Communications - Dispatch levy - 3rd quarter
$
241,499
• G.V. Water District - Barnston/Maple Ridge pump station
$
384,921
• G.V. Water District - water consumption Mar 30 - May 3/11
$
468,695
• G.V. Water District - water consumption May 4 - 31/11
$
395,308
• Receiver General - Three payroll remittances
$
980,198
• The municipality acts as the collection agency for other levels
of government or
agencies. The following collections were remitted in July.
1. Albion Dyking District
$
133,187
2. Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage
$
438,521
3. Provincial School Tax
$
15,416,405
4. Road 13 Dyking District
$
112,175
5. Tretheway Edge Dyking District
$
32,983
d) Policy Implications:
Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice.
CONCLUSIONS:
The disbursements for the month ended July 31, 2011 have been reviewed and are in order.
Prepared by: G'Ann Rygg
Accounting Clerk it
Approved by: Trevor Thompson, CGA
.... '' Manager of Financial Planning
Approved by: Pa I Gill, 13A, CGA
GM - Corp ate7&11nan�l Services
t.
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
gmr
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - JULY 2011
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT
775983 BC Ltd
Roadside mowing
ACM Environmental Corporation
Hazardous materials surveys - Church Ave., 222 St. & 121 St.
Project management - downtown core building demolition
Albion Dyking District
2011 collections
Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd
Watermain replacement Dewdney Trunk Rd. (Laity St. - 216 St.)
Intersection upgrade 216 St. & 121 Ave.
BC Hydro
Electricity July & one June invoice
BC SPCA
Contract July
Community Animal Centre development - 50% share
Briior Homes Ltd
Latecomer agreement
CUPE Local 622
Dues - pay periods 11/13 & 11/14
Canada Pipe Company Ltd
Waterworks pipes & gaskets
Canadian Lawn Care Services
Cemetery Columbaria Plaza
Chevron Canada Ltd
Fuel Aug
Columbia Bitulithic Ltd
Duraphalt
Dams Ford Lincoln Sales Ltd
2011 Ford Expedition
Double M Excavating Ltd
River Road drainage improvements
Sanitary sewer extension to Correction Centre
Downtown Maple Ridge Business
50% BIA & security funding
Durante Kreuk Ltd.
Design development: Albion Park
Core Park
Memorial Park
Websters Corners Park
Emergency Communications
Dispatch levy - 3rd quarter
Finning International Inc
Pump station generator maintenance
Portable generator maintenance
Fortis BC Energy Inc
Natural gas
Gr Vanc Sewerage & Drainage
DCC collection Jan-Jun'11
Waste disposal
Greater Vanc Water District
Barnston/Maple Ridge pump station
Water consumption Mar 30 - May 3/11
Water consumption May 4-31/11
Imperial Paving
2011 annual pavement rehabilitation program
Roadworks
M2K Construction Ltd
North Alouette River Greenway Bridge abutments
Manulife Financial
Employee benefits premiums
Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council
Art Centre grant July
Theatre rental
Maple Ridge Historical Society
Quarterly fee for service payment
McElhanney Consulting Services
Aerial photography engineering
Medical Services Plan
Employee medical & health premiums
Metro Motors Ltd
2011 Ford F250 Supercab 4WD
Minister Of Finance
School tax remittance
Municipal Pension Plan BC
Employee benefits premiums
Paragon Engineering Ltd
Drilled water crossing - Kanaka Creek & Lougheed Hwy.
Pedre Contractors Ltd
230th Street storm sewer replacement
Pitt Meadows Heritage & Museum
Semi-annual fee for service
Pro Sound & Stage Lighting Ltd
Council Chambers audio system
RF Binnie & Associates Ltd
128th Ave. road widening predesign
7,909
8,287
4,439
15.147
26,153
51,236
1,044,187
835,771
1,485
15,271
23,839
777
16,053
2,347
438,521
1,914
384,921
468,695
395,308
57,454
2,916
46,392
200
AMOUNT
18,542
16,196
133,187
19,586
167,023
77,388
24,619
23,286
17,072
16,502
86,304
54,590
50,653
1,879,958
132,050
41,372
241,499
18,400
34,668
440,435
1,248,924
60,370
63,645
127,761
46,592
32,207
15,467
30,999
33,460
15,416,405
157,252
22,000
92,076
37,446
39,109
44,125
Raincity Janitorial Sery Ltd
Janitorial services:
Firehalls
6,317
Library
5,910
Municipal Hall
2,979
Operations
2,999
Randy Herman Building
4,415
RCMP
3,160
Pressure washing community tennis courts
3,263
29,043
Raybern Erectors Ltd
North Alouette Trail Head fencing
14,584
Volker Park fencing
2,484
17,068
Receiver General For Canada
Employer/Employee remit PP11/13, PP11/14 & PP11/15
980,198
RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd
Ice rental Feb
55,521
Curling rink operating expenses May
3,547
59,068
Ridge Meadows Seniors Society
Quarterly operating grant
47,474
Ridge Meadows Recycling Society
Monthly contract for recycling July
92,000
Weekly recycling
383
Litter pick-up contract
1,848
94,231
Road 13 Dyking District
2011 collections
112,175
Scottish Line Painting Ltd
Road painting
27,065
Spencer Brook Estates Ltd
Security refund
17,632
Surrey Fire Service
Dispatch operating charges - Fire Dept.
72,267
Dispatch operating charges - Public works
11,787
84,054
Tretheway Edge Dyking District
2011 collections
32,983
Valley Landscaping Ltd
Websters Corners Park
37,094
Warrington PC[ Management
Advance for Tower common costs July
50,000
Tower expenses June
29,840
79,840
Wedler Engineering
256 Street sanitary sewer extension
40,150
Workers Compensation Board BC
Employer/Employee remittance 2nd qtr 2011
119,988
Disbursements In Excess $15,000 22,739,231
Disbursements Under $15,000 944,530
Total Payee Disbursements 23,683,761
Payroll PP11/13, PP11/14 & PP11/15 2,417,160
Purchase Cards - Payment 104,834
Total Disbursements July 2011 26,205,755
GMR
\\DOVE\CorpServ\Finance\Accounting\Accounts Payable\AP Disbursements\2011\[Monthly_Council_Report_2O11.xlsx]JUL'11