HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-06-04 Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfCommittee of the Whole Agenda June 4, 2012
District of Maple Ridge Note: If required, there will be a 15-minute break at 3:00 p.m. Chair: Acting Mayor 1. DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS – (10 minutes each) 1:00 p.m. 1.1 SmartCentres
– Albion Flats -David Major, Land Development Manager 1.2 Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Municipal Advisory Committee for Accessibility Issues Update – Manfred Wuensche, Chair 2. PUBLIC WORKS
AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda: 1101 2012-049-RZ, 12420 269 Street, A-2 to RS-2 Staff report dated June
4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6930-2012 to permit the subdivision of single family residential lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide
further COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA June 4, 2012 1:00 p.m. Council Chamber Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting takes place on bylaws or resolutions.
A decision is made to send an item to Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more information or clarification before proceeding to Council. Note: Owners and/or
Agents of Development Applications may be permitted to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes.
Committee of the Whole Agenda June 4, 2012 Page 2 of 5 information as described on Schedules B, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with information required
for a Subdivision application. 1102 2012-052-RZ, Text Amendment to CS-1 Zone Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6931-2012 to permit
the operation of a music store in the town centre be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1103 2011-015-RZ, 11959 203 Street, CS-1 to C-2 Staff report dated June
4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6933-2012 to permit apartment use be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6801-2011 to permit construction of a two-storey commercial and residential building be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1104 2011-082-RZ,
10150 and 10190 Jackson Road, RS-3 and M-2 to R-1 and RS-1b Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012 to designate
land use from Low/Medium Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and Conservation in the Albion Area plan be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing
and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6861-2011 to permit future subdivision into approximately 45 single family lots be given second reading. 1105 RZ/024/09, 25467 Bosonworth
Avenue, RS-3 to RS-2 Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6867-2011 to permit a future subdivision of 4 lots be given second reading
and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
Committee of the Whole Agenda June 4, 2012 Page 3 of 5 1106 2012-059-DP, Heritage Alteration Permit, Billy Miner Pub Heritage Site, 22355 River Road Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending
that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal the Heritage Alteration Permit to allow for a coffee shop/restaurant in the Port Haney Post Office building at property located
at 22355 River Road. 1107 DVP/075/10, 10455 and 10481 245B Street Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/075/10 to
vary the minimum lot width for the lots fronting 245 Street. 1108 2012-019-DP/DVP, 11378 Kingston Street Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized
to sign and seal 2012-019-DVP to vary setbacks facing 113B Avenue and Kingston Street and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-019-DP to permit a proposed
multi-tenant industrial building in the M-3 (Business Park) zone. 1109 Maple Ridge Building Bylaw Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012
be given first, second and third readings. 1110 Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) Drinking Water Management Plan Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that the Greater
Vancouver Water District’s Drinking Water Management Plan be endorsed and that implementations of the plan be reviewed through the District’s annual Business Planning process. 1111
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 Staff report dated June 4, 2012 providing information on the regulatory framework and water quality monitoring data for 2011.
Committee of the Whole Agenda June 4, 2012 Page 4 of 5 3. FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERVICES (including Fire and Police) 1131 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERVICES 1151 Fees
and Charges Bylaw Amendment Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees Amending Bylaw No. 6932-2012 be given first, second and third reading.
5. CORRESPONDENCE 1171 6. OTHER ISSUES 1181 7. ADJOURNMENT
Committee of the Whole Agenda June 4, 2012 Page 5 of 5 8. COMMUNITY FORUM Checked by:________________ Date: ________________ COMMUNITY FORUM The Community Forum provides the public with
an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not
tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second opportunity is permitted if no one
else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the individual members of Council. The total time for this Forum
is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a response will be given. Other opportunities are available to address Council including
public hearings and delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving
on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk’s Department at 604-463-5221
or clerks@mapleridge.ca Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-049-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT:
First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6930-2012 12420 269 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit the subdivision of 0.4 hectare (1 acre) single-family residential lots. To proceed further with this application additional information
is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6930-2012 be given First Reading; and; That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules
B, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 – 1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Creus
Engineering Ltd. Owner: 640724 BC Inc Legal Description: District Lot 7890, Group 1, New Westminster District OCP: Existing: Suburban Residential Zoning: Existing: A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
Proposed: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Forest (Blue Mountain) Zone: not applicable (Crown Land) Designation: Forest South: Use: Single-Family
Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential East: Use: Vacant Zone: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Designation: Suburban Residential 1101
-2 -West: Use: Single-Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: Single-Family
Residential Site Area: 65.702 HA. (162 acres) Access: 269 and 272 Streets Servicing requirement: Suburban b) Site Characteristics: The development site is located within the Whonnock
neighbourhood north of Dewdney Trunk Road on an environmentally complicated site. A preliminary environmental assessment of the subject site has been prepared by Sartori Environmental
Services outlining key environmental features. The subject site is 162 acres directly south of the Blue Mountain Forest. The property is comprised of historically logged forest, and
is currently forested by conifer forest vegetation on the north portion of the site and mixed forest vegetation on the south portion of the site. Riparian vegetation type was identified
along watercourse corridors. There are a number of watercourses located on the subject site. The main branches of Cooper and McFadden Creek have been identified by Sartori Environment
Services as fish bearing. In addition to these main branches, five tributaries of the McFadden Creek have also been identified. The subject site is located on the Blue Mountain Aquifer
and adjacent to properties serviced by well water. c) Project Description: The applicant proposes to rezone the subject site to permit future subdivision into one acre parcels. Consideration
for environmentally sensitive areas is proposed to be addressed through a combination of park dedication and habitat protection covenants. The proposed lots will be serviced by private
septic systems and city water. A preliminary subdivision plan has been submitted by the applicant but more details will need to be provided before a subdivision plan can be found to
be acceptable. Determining an acceptable road concept for this large site will be necessary and challenging. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its
compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received.
A more detailed analysis, particularly related to watercourse and environmental protection, and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment will likely
impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan: The subject site is designated Suburban Residential in the Official Community Plan which permits a single detached housing form located outside of the Urban
Area Boundary. The RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone is in compliance with this designation, and requires city water and sewage disposal provided by a private system.
-3 -In addition to the above, the following OCP Policies are applicable to this development proposal: Policy 5-7 Maple Ridge will work in co-operation with Regional, Provincial, and
Federal authorities and plans that contribute to the management and protection of the District’s natural features, and may include but are not limited to the Fraser River Estuary Management
Plan, Blue Mountain Provincial Forest Recreation Management Strategy, Blaney Bog Regional Park, the Kanaka Creek Regional Park Management Plan, and the policies and regulations of the
Agricultural Land Commission. The development proposal will be reviewed in the context of the Blue Mountain Provincial Forest Recreation Management Strategy. Policy 5-19 The following
should be considered in evaluating development to minimize forest interface hazards: a) the siting of development and construction practices that will not contribute to forest fire
risk exposure in forest interface areas; b) the selection of appropriate building materials and maintenance practices that will minimize contribution to the spread of fire; c) the use
of landscaping that minimizes contribution to the spread of fire. A report prepared by a Registered Professional Forester qualified in fire protection engineering using the NFPA-1144
(Standard for Reducing Structure Ignition Hazards from Wildland Fires) and NFPA-1141 (Standard for Fire Protection Infrastructure for Land Developments in Suburban and Rural Areas)
guidelines will be required prior to Second Reading. Policy 5-36 Maple Ridge recognizes the importance of groundwater as a significant source of drinking water in non-urban areas and
will promote the protection, maintenance, and restoration of groundwater quality outside the urban area. Policy 5-37 Maple Ridge will require an evaluation of groundwater flows, conducted
by a qualified environmental professional, for new development that is adjacent to areas reliant on well water. Development proposals that cannot ensure adequate groundwater flows,
sufficient water quality or mitigate potential impacts to existing and surrounding well water systems will not be supported. A Groundwater Impact Assessment Report conducted by a registered
Professional Engineer or Geoscientist with specific expertise in hydrogeology will be required prior to Second Reading. The findings and recommendations of the above mentioned reports
will guide further assessment of the development project and will require the submission of additional applications prior to Second Reading. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes
to rezone the property located at 12420 269 Street from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit future subdivision into single-family lots. Any
variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application.
-4 -Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for all developments and building
permits within 50 metres of the top of bank of all watercourses and wetlands. Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit application
is required for all development and subdivision activity of all lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent. Furthermore, the subject site is located in the proposed
Wildfire Development Permit area. Pending Council approval, this development proposal will be subject to the requirements of the Wildfire Development Permit. The purpose of this Development
Permit is to minimize the risk to property and people from wildland fires through the use of precautionary measures. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting
is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. e) Interdepartmental
Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed
below: a) Engineering Department; b) Building Department; c) Operations Department; d) Fire Department; e) Parks Department. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it
may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department
for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements and road patterns has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between First
and Second Reading. f) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No.
5879 – 1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); 2. Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); 3. Natural Features Development Permit
Application (Schedule G); 4. Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses.
-5 -CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information
being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Amelia Bowden Planning Technician _______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________ Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AB/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6930-2012 "Original signed by Amelia Bowden" "Original signed by Christine Carter" "Original signed by Frank Quinn" "Original signed by
J.L. (Jim) Rule"
Appendix A
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6930-2012 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended ________________________________________________________
___ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge,
in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6930-2012." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described
as: District Lot 7890 Group 1 New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1572 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned
to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day
of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day
of , A.D. 20 . _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Appendix B
12395 12350 12265 12291 12310 12357 12485 12695 12298 123 59 12525 12597 12711 12355 12375 12380 12390 12391 12340 12360 12635 1263412668 12295 12345 12345 12348 12313 12420 12335 12383
12696 12370 12361 12565 12410 12768 12330 12295 12577 12470 12785 12540 12323 12270 12616 12406 P 8097 LOT 1 C LMP 6073 12 LMP 6073 LMP 6073 10P 34392 1 P 34392 17 6 10 Rem 9 LMP 10923
17 4 EP 32859 11 14 REM. E 1/2 NW 1/4 7 8 14 31 689 P 12094 11 5 18 Rem 32 3 10 6 P 34392 BCP 25318 P 34392 1 30 N.E. 1/4 LOT 2 NE 1/4 16 LMP 6073 PARK P 34391 5 P 34392 BC P 25318
2 E 1/2 NW 1/4 9 P 65913 29 B A LMP 6073 11 13 LMP 6073 7 13 P 65913 LMP 6073 26 LMP 15210 P 34391 P 34392 LMP 20049 Rem A 16 12 LMP 17142 LMP 14072 LMP 6073 19 LMP 109 23 Rem 15 7
15 BCP 1 0209 3 RP 65914 EP 79930 BCP 25 31 9 EP 65915 LMP 20050 EP 65916 EP 65916 LMP 10924 LMP 6077 LMP 6074 LMP 6080 LMP 6 07 0 BCP 45140 LMP 6077 BC P 25 319 LMP 43621 EP 65916
RP 65914 EP 6 5915 LMP 607 8 LMP 10924 BCP 25320 BCP 102 10 EP 65916 LMP 14073 LMP 6079 BCP 1 5526 LMP 140 73 LMP 10924 BC P 25 321 McNUTT RD. 270 A ST. 123 AVE. 270 ST. 271 ST. 269
ST. BLUE MOUNTAIN CR. ´ SCALE 1:7,000 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) 6930-2012 1572
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-052-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT:
First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6931-2012 Text Amendment to CS-1 Zone EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received for a text amendment to the CS-1 Highway Commercial
Zone to permit the operation of a music store at 22674 Dewdney Trunk Road which is located in the Town Centre. This application will not require an amendment to the Official Community
Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6931-2012 be given First Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Tom Lee Music Co.
Limited Darry Major Owner: 294306 BC Ltd Legal Description: Lot 4, DL 401, Block 1, Plan 12215 OCP: Existing: Town Centre Commercial Proposed: No Change Zoning: Existing: CS-1 Highway
Commercial Proposed: No Change b) Project Description: This application for a text amendment to the CS-1 Service Commercial Zone is to permit a music store in a Town Centre property
with CS-1 Service Commercial zoning. (The subject property is at 22674 Dewdney Trunk Road.) Unless specifically referred to as an outright permitted use, all retail uses in this zone
have a minimum retail space of 2000m2. On this basis, the current proposed use 1102
-2 -does not meet this minimum area requirement and would not be permitted under current zoning. A rezoning application to C-3 Town Centre Commercial would be supported at this location.
Contained within the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan, the Town Centre Area Plan designates this site as Town Centre Commercial which would align with the C-3 Town Centre Commercial
Zone. The applicant prefers to instead proceed with a text amendment to the existing CS-1 Service Commercial Zone. Both approaches – whether a text amendment to the existing zone or
rezoning to a new one are supportable, as discussed below., b) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The location of this proposed use is supportable based on the policies of
the Official Community Plan for the Regional Town Centre. Policy 6-23 states: All forms of commercial development, including street front retailing, will continue to be encouraged on
appropriate streets in the Regional Town Centre. The CS-1 Zone is more restrictive, and is intended to accommodate uses oriented to the motoring public. This Zone aligns with commercial
locations outside of the Town Centre. The permitted uses in this zone reflect a long term concern within the District and the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan to establish and maintain
a “hierarchy” of commercial services, with distinct services available in the Town Centre, in Neighbourhood Centres, and along the Lougheed Highway and Dewdney Trunk Road. For this
reason, smaller scale retail and personal service uses that are available in the Town Centre and Neighbourhood centres are not permitted in the CS-1 Zone. However, this text amendment
is supportable as the sale of musical instruments is auto oriented and often requires a larger showroom that would typically be found in the CS-1 Zone. It should be noted that as the
subject site is zoned CS-1, this proposed text amendment will apply to all CS-1 zoned properties. This proposal does not generate a need for an amendment to the Official Community Plan.
Zoning Bylaw: The proposed Text amendment to the Zoning Bylaw is as follows: Part 7, Commercial Zones, Section 708, Service Commercial: CS-1 is amended as follows: 1) SUBSECTION 1,
PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, is amended by the deletion of (o) in its entirety and replacing it with the following: (o) retail limited to household furnishings, vehicle parts and accessories,
second hand goods, antiques, musical instruments, and sports equipment and accessories, with other retail uses limited to a minimum 2000 m2 gross floor area. 2) SUBSECTION 2, PERMITTED
ACCESSORY USES, is amended by the addition of the following: (f) Music lessons where the principal use is for the retail of musical instruments.
-3 -d) Alternatives: This proposed use for a music store at 22674 Dewdney Trunk Road is supportable based on the policies within the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan for the Town
Centre. The recommended approach to address the applicant’s business needs is to proceed with a text amendment to the existing CS-1 Zone. However, Council may wish instead to require
that the subject property be rezoned to C-3 Town Centre Commercial, to reflect its location within the Town Centre and align with the provisions of the Area Plan.. CONCLUSION: Based
on the considerations outlined in this report, dated June 4, 2012, it is recommended that this proposed text amendment to the CS-1 Zone be adopted. The goal with this amendment is to
meet the applicant’s business needs without eroding the intent of the Service Commercial Zone to pertain to larger format retail, automotive services, and other uses associated with
a motoring customer base. _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Diana Hall Planner _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter,
M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services _________________________________________
______ Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Zone Amending Bylaw 6931-2012 "Original
signed by Frank Quinn" "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" "Original signed by Christine Carter" "Original signed by Diana Hall"
Appendix A
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.6931-2012 A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. ___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge,
in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6931-2012." 2. Part 7, Commercial Zones, Section 708, Service Commercial:
CS-1 SUBSECTION 1, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, is amended by the deletion of (o) in it entirety and replacing it with the following: (o) retail limited to household furnishings, vehicle
parts and accessories, second hand goods, antiques, musical instruments and accessories, and sports equipment and accessories, with other retail uses limited to a minimum 2000m2 gross
floor area. SUBSECTION 2, PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES, is amended by the addition of the following: f) Music lessons, where the principal use is for the retail of musical instruments.
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200 . READ a second
time the day of , A.D. 200 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 . _____________________________ ____________________________
MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER Appendix B
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-015-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT:
First and Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6933 – 2012 Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6801 – 2011 11959 203 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application
has been received to rezone the subject property from CS-1 (Service Commercial) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit construction of a two storey commercial and residential building.
This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6933 -2012 be given First and Second Reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6801 -2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 3. That the following terms and
conditions be met prior to Final Reading. i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; ii. A Statutory Right-of-Way plan and agreement must be registered at the
Land Title Office for storm sewer; iii. A Reciprocal Cross Access plan and agreement must be registered at the Land Title Office; iv. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional
Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance
with the regulations; v. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking; 1103
-2 -vi. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Resident Parking; vii. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant securing four (4) parking spots on the adjacent property;
and viii. Registration of a Housing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant to ensure residential units remain as rental units. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Roger Kocheff
Owner: MICA Properties Ltd Legal Description: Lot 2, D.L. 222, GP 1, NWD Plan BCP16317 OCP: Existing: Commercial Zoning: Existing: CS-1 (Service Commercial) Proposed: C-2 (Community
Commercial) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Commercial Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial) Designation: Commercial South: Use: Vacant Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation:
Commercial East: Use: Commercial Zone: C-2 (Community Commercial) Designation: Commercial West: Use: Industrial Zone: M-1 (Service Industrial) Designation: Commercial Existing Use of
Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: 2 Storey Commercial/Residential building Site Area: 910 m² Access: 203 Street Servicing requirement: Urban
-3 -b) Project Description: The project consists of a two-storey mixed use commercial and residential building. The proposed development will contain three commercial units on the ground
floor and six residential units on the second floor. The site would share vehicular access from the adjacent property to the north and parking spaces would be provided at the rear of
the building. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject site is designated Commercial on Schedule B of the Official Community Plan (OCP) and the proposed development
is in compliance with this designation. Specifically, the subject site is identified as General Commercial due to its location west of 207 Street in the vicinity of the intersections
between Dewdney Trunk Road and Lougheed Highway as identified in Policy 6-23 of the OCP. Zoning Bylaw: The application proposes to rezone the property located at 11959 203 Street from
CS-1 (Service Commercial) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit a two-storey mixed use commercial and residential building. A Development Variance Permit is required to permit a second
storey that is greater than 50% of the ground floor. This variance is justified as the six proposed residential units will be rental units and the applicant will enter into a Housing
Agreement that will be registered on title. As a result, a site specific text amendment is also required to allow for apartment as a principal use in the C-2 zone on the subject site
only. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.5 of the Official Community Plan, a Commercial Development Permit application is required to address the current proposal’s compatibility
with adjacent development, and to enhance the unique character of the community. Advisory Design Panel: The Advisory Design Panel reviewed the form and character of the proposed commercial
and residential development and the landscaping plans at a meeting held December 13, 2011. Following presentations by the project Architect and Landscape Architect, the Advisory Design
Panel made the following resolution: That the following concerns be addressed, and that digital versions of revised drawings and a memo be submitted to Planning staff; and further that
Planning staff forward this on to the Advisory Design Panel for information. Consider adding trim and joint details on the stucco walls
-4 - Alignment size of windows at residential levels to suit function and look at the fenestration of the openings Clarify exit path to north drive isle from west residential exit
and reconsider relocation of exit door to west elevation Consider deletion of up-stand at punched opening adjacent to small car parking space at grid A4 Indicate rough ins for CRU
washrooms Clarify sign ban for corner unit Relocate bike rack closer to east property line to allow pedestrian circulation in front of corner unit Identify residential entrance
indicate interphone and mailboxes residential entry to have distinct entrance from commercial units Consider changing the residential door so it doesn’t match the commercial doors
Consider shifting the northeast bay one module to west to accentuate corner element Consider street trees Consider the addition of balconies to the west elevations residential
units Consider a cap or cornice detail at stucco walls Consider wrapping the canopy around the northeast corner Coordinate the location of gas meter The applicant has addressed
the ADP resolution and revised drawings have been circulated to panel members for comment. The building’s form and character will be the subject of a future Commercial Development Permit
report to Council. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed development and has advised that all required services
exist for the project. As a result, a Rezoning Servicing Agreement will not be necessary. Additionally, the Engineering Department has determined that the existing storm easement must
be revised to accurately show the location of the services to allow for the building to be located as proposed. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department
have identified that after the development is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an
additional two trees. The Manager of Park Planning and Development has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $50.00.
-5 -Fire Department: The Fire Department has reviewed the proposed development and has outlined a number of standard considerations to be made at the Building Permit stage, including
fire connection specifics and address visibility requirements. e) Environmental Implications: The applicant has provided an arborist report for the small amount of trees on and within
five metres the subject site. The existing tree stand will be removed and will be compensated by hedge planting along the garbage and recycling enclosure. CONCLUSION: As the proposed
development is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, it is recommended that First and Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6933 – 2012 and forwarded
to Public Hearing; and further that Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6801 -2011 and forwarded to Public Hearing. _______________________________________________
Prepared by: Amelia Bowden Planning Technician _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning ________________________________________
_______ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services _______________________________________________ Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative
Officer AB /dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6801 – 2011 Appendix C – Maple Ridge Zone Amending
Bylaw 6933 -2012 Appendix D– Site Plan Appendix E – Building Elevation Plans Appendix F– Landscape Plans "Original signed by Amelia Bowden" "Original signed by Christine Carter" "Original
signed by Frank Quinn" "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
Appendix A
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6801 -2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. ______________________________________________________
_____ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge,
in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6801 -2011." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as: Lot 2 District Lot 222 New Westminster District Plan BCP16317 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1512 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this
Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to C-2 (Community Commercial). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first
time the 26th day of April, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the
Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER
CORPORATE OFFICER Appendix B
20285 20284 11927/35 20318 20337 20370 20245 20321 11959 12025 20279 20306 11957 20398 20436 11941 11961 11985 20370 20390 20399 20304 20319 20325 20395 20299 20290 119 AVE. DEWDNEY
TRUNK 203 ST. P 62569 Rem Pcl ONE RP 8346 Pcl. 1 7 BCP 16317 Rem M LMP 33673 LMP 33673 LMP 34007 C 2B A B RP 7774 RW 43436 1 BCP 30389 1 P 61704 1 L LMP 34007 D EP 11127Rem 1 C LMP
33673 ALMP 34007 68 P 48586 P 77583 2 74 8 P 12828 DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD 203 ST. LOUGHEED HWY. ´ SCALE 1:2,000 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: 6801-2011 1512 CS-1
(Service Commercial) C-2 (Community Commercial)
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6933-2012 A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. ___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge,
in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6933-2012." 2. PART 7, COMMERCIAL ZONES, SECTION 702, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL:
C-2 is amended as follows: i. SECTION 1, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, is amended by the addition of the following: o) Apartment is permitted in the following location: 11959 203 Street
ii. SECTION 8, OTHER REGULATIONS, SUBSECTION (a) is amended by deleting the first sentence in its entirety and replacing it with the following: a) A principal or accessory apartment
use shall: 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation and Highways this day of , A.D. 200 . RECONSIDERED AND
FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 . _____________________________ ____________________________ MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER Appendix C
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-082-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT:
First Reading and Second Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012; and; Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6861-2011 10150 and 10190 Jackson
Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject lands from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and M-2 (General Industrial) to R-1 (Residential District)
and RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit future subdivision into single-family lots. This application requires an amendment to the Official Community Plan
to re-designate the land use from Low/Medium Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and Conservation in the Albion Area Plan. On November 8, 2011, Council gave First Reading
to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6861-2011 to rezone this property to R-1 (Residential District) and RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), and considered the early consultation
requirements for the OCP amendment. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided
by way of posting Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a Development Information Meeting,
and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw; 2. That Maple Ridge Official Community
Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 3. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community
Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012
be given First and Second Readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 1104
-2 -5. That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6861-2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and, 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to
Final Reading: i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; ii. Amendment to Schedule "A" & “C” of the Official Community Plan; iii. Registration of a geotechnical
report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iv. Road and park dedication as required; v. Consolidation of the development
site; vi. Purchase of the eastern portion of Lot B of BCP 46878 (10190 Jackson Road) and consolidation of western portion with Jackson Farm Park; and, vii. A disclosure statement must
be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management
Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Damax Consultants Ltd Owners: Seyem’ Qwantlen Land Development Ltd District of
Maple Ridge Legal Descriptions: Lot: A, Section: 3, Township: 12,NWD Plan: EPP9830 Lot: B, Section: 3, Township 12, NWD Plan: BCP46878 OCP: Existing: Low/Medium Density Residential,
Medium Density Residential Proposed: Medium Density Residential, Conservation Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), M-2 (General Industrial) Proposed: R-1 (Residential
District), RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
-3 -Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Park Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), M-2 (General Industrial) Designation: Conservation South: Use: Vacant Zone: R-1 (Residential District)
Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Vacant Zone: R-1 (Residential District), RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Park
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), M-2 (General Industrial) Designation: Agricultural Existing Use of Property: Sand and Gravel (Vacant and Improved), Vacant Proposed Use of
Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: 4.12 hectares (10.3 acres) Access: Jackson Road Servicing requirement: Urban Standard b) Project Description: The applicant proposes to
rezone the subject site, a former sand and gravel pit, to allow for future subdivision into approximately 45 R-1 (Residential District) lots. A very small portion of the north east
corner of the site will be zoned RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to be eventually consolidated with an RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) lot
further east. Approximately 1.46 hectares (3.6 acres) of steep sloping land will be dedicated as park, which will include a lookout area and a multipurpose trail connecting to existing
trails to the north of the subject site. Portions of the site are proposed to be filled with soil acquired from the re-grading of lands to the east. It will be necessary for the applicant
to purchase the eastern portion of municipal property located at 10190 Jackson Road in order to proceed with this development application. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan:
The subject site is located in the Albion Area Plan. Approximately 75% of the site is designated Low/Medium Density Residential, while the remainder is designated Medium Density Residential.
Both these Official Community Plan designations permit single detached housing forms located in the Albion Area. The R-1 (Residential District) zone is in compliance with the Medium
Density Residential designation, but the Low/Medium Density Residential designation would typically allow
-4 -an RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone. The land to the south and east of the subject site (Upper Jackson Farm) is outside the Albion Area Plan and is designated
Urban Residential. There is an active subdivision application (SD/040/09) on that land for R-1 (Residential District) zoned lots. Therefore, justification has been provided to support
an OCP amendment to re-designate the Low/Medium Density Residential land to Medium Density Residential on the subject site. The subject site is not located in the North Albion Area
and therefore not involved in the North Albion Review process currently underway. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 10150 and 10190
Jackson Road from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and M-2 (General Industrial) to R-1 (Residential District) and RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit
future subdivision into single family homes. All the proposed lots meet the requirements of these zones. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan,
a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity for all lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent to
ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions. Development Information
Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was held at Thomas Haney Secondary School on April 5, 2012. A summary of the comments and discussions with the attendees was provided by the
applicant and included the following concerns: Impact of 248 Street properties’ views; Pedestrian safety on Jackson Road. The applicant provided the following in response to the
issues raised by the public: The existing grades on the subject site will be lowered substantially and as a result, will reduce the impact on views. Road improvements to increase
pedestrian safety are proposed to include a sidewalk on the east side of Jackson Road and a multi-purpose trail on the west side to connect with the park to the south. A round-about
traffic circle will be constructed at Jackson Road and 102 Avenue as part of a separate application (SD/040/09).
-5 -d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed development and has advised that no servicing works are required with
this application and therefore a Rezoning Servicing Agreement will not be needed. Sanitary and storm sewer construction, as well as watermain and street light installation on Jackson
Road fronting this site, has previously been secured through the Rezoning Servicing Agreement for development of Upper Jackson Farm under approved application RZ/040/09. The Engineering
Department has further advised that road dedication along the full length of the development site, including a portion of 10190 Jackson Road, to achieve the 26 metre road allowance
required for an urban arterial, will be necessary for this project. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision
is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional 50 trees which is based on one tree
per lot; final subdivision design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their
budget requirements by $1250.00. Fire Department: The Fire Department has reviewed the proposed development and has noted that any landscaping proposed for the lots fronting Jackson
Road should not obscure the visibility of addresses now or in the future to ensure efficient emergency response. e) School District Comments: A referral was submitted to School District
42 for comment on the proposed OCP amendment; however, no comments have been received to date. In past discussions with staff of the School District, it is clear that Albion Elementary
is exceeding capacity. Therefore, an increase to the number of elementary-aged children as a result of this proposal will likely require those children to attend a school other than
Albion Elementary. f) Environmental Implications: The applicant has submitted a Natural Features Development Permit application as the subject site includes lands with an average natural
slope of greater than 15 percent. The requirements of this Development Permit will be to provide enhancement and replanting works in the areas identified for park dedication, as well
as securities equivalent to 100% of the replanting works and maintenance for five years. g) Intergovernmental Issues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan
requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required
for this application, from land use designation
-6 -Low/Medium Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and Conservation is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing
procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal
and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined
to have no impact. CONCLUSION: Based on the review of supporting information regarding the proposed rezoning and subdivision applications, it is recommended that Second Reading be given
to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6861-2011 and forwarded to Public Hearing; and further that First and Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw
No. 6928-2012 and be forwarded to Public Hearing. _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Amelia Bowden Planning Technician _______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________ Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AB /dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject
Map Appendix B –Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw 6928-2012 Appendix C – Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6861-2011 Appendix D – Subdivision Plan Appendix E – Overall
Subdivision Plan "Original signed by Amelia Bowden" "Original signed by Christine Carter" "Original signed by Frank Quinn" "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6861-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. _______________________________________________________
____ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge,
in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6861-2011." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and
described as: Lot A Section 3 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP9830 Lot B Section 3 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan BCP46878 and outlined in heavy black line on
Map No. 1543 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District), and RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential).
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 8th day of November, A.D. 2011. READ a second
time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED
AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Appendix B
24616 10250 10262 24665 10040 10303 24632 2 4642 24652 10275 10286 24740 24735 24760 24765 10268 10295 24725 24795 24790 24539 24602 10265 10296 10298 10316 10322 10235 10190 24662 24661
10272 24673 24691 10312 24720 24755 24770 24771 24785 10306 24622 10309 10256 10292 24775 10307 24554/72 10150 24608 24653 24685 10302 24750 24780 10076 10104 10289 10278 10306 24730
24745 24752 10125 10295 10180 Rem S. 1/2 OF N.E. 1/4 SEC . 3 BCP 20685 A9 6 1 BCP 23574 121 BCP 46878 A 9 25 1 PARK LOT A 45 46 1 EPP 9830 PARK 3 8 65 BCP 34635 68 PARK 469 123 BCP
17387 16 BCP 46878 BCP 43808 BCP 47688 47 BCP 33649 PARK PARK BCP 46878 3 120 BCP 17387 14 15 127 67 PARK B B BCP 46878NWP 6502 BCP38265 5 66 2 PARK 6 BCP 17387 11 12 26 17 Municipal
gravel pit BCP 46878 6 2 Rem N 1/2 of NE 1/4 122 7 5 13 PARK Municipal gravel pit63 Provincial gravel pit 64 4 Section 3 Township 12 5 8 10 4 PARK 2 *LM P 5856 BCP 46878 44 43 10 126
7 3 27 BCP 41516 BCP 40804 BCP 41517 LMP 42377 BCP 17389 BCP 23575 BCP 41516 LMP 42379 BCP20686 LMP 423 77 BCP 23575 BCP382 6 6 BCP 41516 P 38409 LMP 42380 102 AVE JACKSON RD. 102 B
AVE. 102 A AVE. 103 AVE. McEACHERN ST. 248 ST. 100 AVE. ´ MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: 6861-2011 1543 RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), M-2 (General Industrial)
R-1 (Residential District) RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) 1:3,500
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6928-2012 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan _______________________________________ WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government
Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "A" & "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE,
the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012 2. Schedule "A", Section 10.2.1 Land Use Designations, Albion Area Plan map is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises
known and described as: Lot A Section 3 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP9830 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 833, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms
part of this Bylaw, is hereby re-designated to Medium Density Residential and Conservation. 3. Schedule “C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as: Lot A Section 3 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP9830 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 834, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of
this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 200
. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 200 . READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 200 . READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 200 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D.
2012. ___________________________________ _____________________________ MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER Appendix C
24616 10250 10262 24665 10040 10303 24632 24642 24652 10275 10286 24740 24735 24760 24765 10268 10295 24725 24795 24790 245 39 24602 10265 10296 10298 10316 10322 10235 10190 24662 24661
10272 24673 24691 10312 24720 24755 24770 24771 24785 10306 24622 10309 10256 10292 24775 10307 24554/72 10150 24608 24653 24685 10302 24750 24780 10076 10104 10289 10278 10306 24730
24745 24752 10125 10295 10180 Rem S. 1/2 OF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 3 BCP 20685 A9 6 1 BCP 23574 121 BCP 46878 A 9 25 1 PARK LOT A 45 46 1 EPP 9830 PARK 3 8 65 BCP 34635 68 PARK 469 123 BCP 17387
16 BCP 46878 BCP 43808 BCP 47688 47 BCP 33649 PARK PARK BCP 46878 3 120 BC P 17387 14 15 127 67 PARK B B BCP 46878NWP 6502 BCP38265 5 66 2 PARK 6 BCP 17387 11 12 26 17 Municipal gravel
pit BCP 46878 6 2 Rem N 1/2 of NE 1/4 122 7 5 13 PARK Municipal gravel pit63 Provincial gravel pit 64 4 Section 3 Township 12 5 8 10 4 PARK 2 *LMP 5856 BCP 46878 44 43 10 126 7 3 27
BCP 41516 BCP 40804 BCP 41517 LMP 42377 BCP 17389 BCP 23575 BCP 41516 LMP 42379 BCP20686 LMP 4 2377 BCP 23575 BCP38266 BCP 41516 P 38409 LMP 42380 102 AVE JACKSON RD. 102 B AVE. 102
A AVE. 103 AVE. McEACHERN ST. 248 ST. 100 AVE. ´ MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: 6928-2011 833 Low/Medium Density Residential, Medium Density
Residential Conservation Medium Density Residential 1:3,500
24616 10250 10262 24665 10040 10303 24632 24642 24652 10275 10286 24740 24735 24760 24765 10268 10295 24725 24795 24790 245 39 24602 10265 10296 10298 10316 10322 10235 10190 24662 24661
10272 24673 24691 10312 24720 24755 24770 24771 24785 10306 24622 10309 10256 10292 24775 10307 24554/72 10150 24608 24653 24685 10302 24750 24780 10076 10104 10289 10278 10306 24730
24745 24752 10125 10295 10180 Rem S. 1/2 OF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 3 BCP 20685 A9 6 1 BCP 23574 121 BCP 46878 A 9 25 1 PARK LOT A 45 46 1 EPP 9830 PARK 3 8 65 BCP 34635 68 PARK 469 123 BCP 17387
16 BCP 46878 BCP 43808 BCP 47688 47 BCP 33649 PARK PARK BCP 46878 3 120 BC P 17387 14 15 127 67 PARK B B BCP 46878NWP 6502 BCP38265 5 66 2 PARK 6 BCP 17387 11 12 26 17 Municipal gravel
pit BCP 46878 6 2 Rem N 1/2 of NE 1/4 122 7 5 13 PARK Municipal gravel pit63 Provincial gravel pit 64 4 Section 3 Township 12 5 8 10 4 PARK 2 *LMP 5856 BCP 46878 44 43 10 126 7 3 27
BCP 41516 BCP 40804 BCP 41517 LMP 42377 BCP 17389 BCP 23575 BCP 41516 LMP 42379 BCP20686 LMP 4 2377 BCP 23575 BCP38266 BCP 41516 P 38409 LMP 42380 102 AVE JACKSON RD. 102 B AVE. 102
A AVE. 103 AVE. McEACHERN ST. 248 ST. 100 AVE. ´ MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. Purpose: 6928-2011 834 To Add To Conservation 1:3,500
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/024/09 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT:
Second Reading; Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6867-2011 25467 Bosonworth Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One
Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), to permit a future subdivision of 4 lots. The proposed RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zoning complies with
the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6867-2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and
conditions be met prior to Final Reading. i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement;
ii. Amendment to Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan; iii. Road dedication as required; iv. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title
Office which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; v. Removal of the existing buildings that will not comply with future lot lines; vi. A disclosure statement
must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management
Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations. 1105
-2 -DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Don Bowins Owner: John H. Buckle, Judy L Duncan, Ty N. Vong, Nicole J. Buckle Legal Description: Lot 6 Block 3 & 4 Section 14 Township
12 New Westminster District Plan 17459 OCP: Existing: Suburban Residential Proposed: Suburban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential in the ALR Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation Agriculture South: Use: Single Family
Strata Zone: RG-2 (Suburban Residential Strata) Designation: Suburban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban
Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed
Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: 2.030 HA. (5 acres) Access: Bosonworth Avenue Servicing requirement: Municipal water and septic fields b) Project Description:
The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit subdivision into four (4) lots. It
is currently undeveloped except for one dwelling located on the center property. The land is proposed to be subdivided in a manner to retain this building in compliance with the required
setback on one of the proposed lots. The proposed lots will be serviced by municipal water and on-lot septic systems. The site slopes downward away from Bosonworth Avenue. At time of
subdivision, the location, grade and design of the driveways will accommodate emergency apparatus such as fire engines to access buildings on the lots. There is a steeper slope towards
the east and at the northeast parts of the site.
-3 -This area will be subject to a restrictive covenant to prevent disturbance and to retain it in its natural state. The property gains access from Bosonworth Avenue. This street has
been recently been upgraded in conjunction with the new rural subdivision to the south (SD-051-09). c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The properly is designated Suburban
Residential in the Official Community Plan. The proposed zoning, use, density and lot sizes align with this OCP designation. The site borders the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) to
the north and thus is subject to OCP policies for sites along the ALR Boundary, namely: Requiring agricultural impact assessments (AIAs) and Groundwater Impact Assessment of non-farm
development and infrastructure projects and identifying measures to off-set impacts on agricultural capability; Environmental Impact Assessments are to be completed where rezoning or
subdivision is proposed within or adjacent to natural features or significant lands identified in the OCP. Therefore, the identified sloping areas in the eastern and northeastern part
of the site will be subject to issuance of a Natural Features Development Permit (NFDP) and registration of a conservation restrictive covenant. The required studies and reports have
been submitted. Necessary legal documents (restrictive covenants) and any identified actions or mitigation measures will be conditions set by the Approving Officer as part of final
subdivision approval, and the NFDP will be considered for issuance concurrently with rezoning. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 25467
Bosonworth Avenue from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit subdivision into four lots. The applicant has submitted a preliminary
lot layout plan showing that the areas, width and depth of each lot, the location of the dwelling unit being retained and proposed new building envelopes will comply with the Zoning
Bylaw. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision
activity to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement for the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions for: All areas
designated Conservation on Schedule “B” or all areas within 50 metres of an area designated Conservation on Schedule “B”, or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver Valley Area Plan;
-4 - All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent; All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural Features Schedule “C” Development Information
Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was not required for this proposal because the proposal is for fewer than 25 units (lots), and is in compliance with Official Community Plan
policies. d) Environmental Implications: Environment comments for this proposal are as follows: 1. A Natural Features Development Permit (NFDP) will be required due to the slopes on
the property. 2. The submitted Arborist Report needs to be revised to identify the tree that will be retained, protected or removed. 3. The details and conclusions contained in the
submitted Geotechnical and Hydrological reports may need to be revised due to changes to the neighbouring location to the south and the original application having this property separated
from the property to the east (25590 Bosonworth Avenue). 4. Coordination between the civil engineer, geotechnical engineer and the environmental consultants of record is required to
determine whether the NFDP needs to address for groundwater management, rainwater management and stormwater management mitigation for the site for road infrastructure and the proposed
lots. Surrounding sites, especially those properties immediately to the north and down slope of this property and within the ALR should not be impacted as a result of this proposed
development. 5. In the event additional environmental concerns are identified they will be addressed through the Natural features Development Permit. e) Agricultural Impact: An Agricultural
Impact Assessment Report, dated September 4, 2011, was prepared for the applicant by Letts Environmental Consultants. The conclusions of the report included: 1. Disclosure be prepared
and provided to all homebuyers or prospective homebuyers of parcels in the proposed subdivision about possible negative impacts, including noise, farm smell, chemical sprays, and unsightliness
arising from allowable agricultural activities. Therefore, a restrictive covenant to this effect is proposed to be registered on title; 2. The greatest potential impact on agriculture
from the proposed development is drainage. This can be mitigated through careful storm water and rainwater management. f) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The
Engineering Department has advised required road and water services for this development are not available. There is a development application (RZ/102/03 and SD/102/03) on the south
side of Bosonworth Avenue that as a condition of approval is to construct road and extend water services that will satisfy the requirements for the subject site, except for dedication
for road widening.
-5 -Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the
street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional 4 trees which is based on one tree per lot. The final subdivision design will provide exact
numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $100.00. Fire Department: Comments
from the Fire Department relating to the location, grade and design of the driveways to accommodate emergency apparatus such as fire engines to access buildings on the lots will be
addressed through the subdivision process. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6867-2011 and that application RZ/024/09
be forwarded to Public Hearing. _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, MCAHP Planning Technician _______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL., MCIP Director of Planning _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________ Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AK/The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Zone Amending Bylaw 6867-2011 Appendix C – Site Plan "Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski" "Original signed by Christine Carter" "Original signed by Frank Quinn" "Original
signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
Appendix A
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6867-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. _______________________________________________________
____ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge,
in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6867-2011." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described
as: Lot 6 Block 3 & 4 Section 14 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 17459 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1545 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of
this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 11th day of October, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED
AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Appendix B
25380 25450 25492 25502 25536 25520 11130 25422 25460 25505 25559 25595 25360 25385 25425 25442 25445 25443 25500 25518 25541 25596 25355 25465 25494 25467 25542 25580 25485 25556 25399
25440 25480 25588 25350 25370 25390 25466 25482 25590 25554 25592 25420 25518 25523 25540 25572 25577 25580 BOSONWORTH AVE. GODWIN DRIVE P 32801 SL65 EPS 234 SL75 SL67 P 34100 SL55
SL54 EPS 234 SL64 SL38 SL39 SL40 SL61 11 SL44 SL48 EPS 234 P 35648 P 41743 8 SL51 SL45 12 SL47 SL68 SL56 SL66 P 17459 9 P 17459 SL60 5 41 SL80 Rem 25 SL37 SL63 SL41 SL43 SL49 SL46 SL78
59 10 P 17459SL58 28 SL35 SL36 7 SL53 SL52 SL59 SL79 SL74 SL34 6 SL62 SL42 SL50 SL57 EPP 7740 EPP 7740 EPP 7741 EPP 7740 EPP 7740 BCP 39013 EPP 7740 EPP 7741 EPP 7740 EPP 7740 EPP 7740
EPP 7741 EPP 7741 EPP 7742 SL78 SL82 BOSONWORTH AVE. 256 ST. CARMICHAEL ST. ´ SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: 6867-2011 1545 RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-059-DP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT:
Heritage Alteration Permit – Billy Miner Pub Heritage Site 22355 River Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On May 4, 2011, Council adopted a Heritage Designation and Revitalization and Tax Exemption
Agreement (HRA) Bylaw No. 6760-2010 for the Billy Miner Pub site, where the historic Bank of Montreal and the Port Haney Post Office buildings are located. The Port Haney Post Office
was most recently used as a liquor store. The owners are requesting to change the use to a coffee shop/restaurant. Some building alterations are needed to undertake this new business
venture. Since the building is protected through HRA Bylaw No. 6760-2010 Sections 972 and 973 of the Local Government Act require Council to approve a HRA prior to any work being undertaken.
This report outlines the details of the Heritage Alteration Permit application and the preservation of the site’s heritage value through the building alteration process. RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal the Heritage Alteration Permit respecting property located at 22355 River Road. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant:
Ken Brookes Owner: Alpenhaus Restaurants Ltd. Legal Description: Lot: 1, D.L.: 398, Block: 1, BCP 47640 OCP : Existing: Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial & Mixed-Use Proposed: Port
Haney Multi-Family, Commercial & Mixed-Use Zoning: Existing: H-1 (Heritage Commercial), C-4 (Neighbourhood Public House Commercial) Other: Heritage Revitalization Agreement Bylaw No.
6760-2010 1106
-2 -Surrounding Uses North: Use: Vacant Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial & Mixed-Use South: Use: Railway Transportation Corridor
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), M-2 (General Industrial) Designation: Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial & Mixed-Use East: Use: Haney
Bypass Road Right-of-Way Zone: N/A Designation: N/A West: Use: Vacant Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) – Rezoning application underway for 4-storey residential use Designation:
Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial & Mixed-Use Existing Use of Property: Neighbourhood Pub Proposed Use of Property: Neighbourhood Pub, Restaurant and Coffee Shop Site Area: 1,280
m2 Access: River Road and 223rd Street Servicing: Urban Previous Applications: RZ/056/10 b) Project Description: The Billy Miner Pub has been in operation for over 30 years and has
become a well-known establishment in Maple Ridge. The pub is located in the former Port Haney Bank of Montreal building, constructed in 1911, and which celebrated its 100th birthday
last year. In more recent years the adjacent Port Haney Post Office building, which was constructed in 1933, was used as a liquor store. When the site came under new ownership in 2010,
the property owners closed the Port Haney liquor store and moved the retail licence to a new location on Dewdney Trunk Road and 240th Street. Since then, the Post Office building has
been vacant. The property owners are now proposing to open a coffee shop/restaurant in the Port Haney Post Office building that will be more of a family-oriented part of the Billy Miner
establishment. Menu items will be shared between the pub and restaurant buildings. New patio space was recently constructed between the two buildings for patrons to enjoy outdoor seating
during the summer months. c) Planning Analysis: The subject site is designated as Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial and Mixed-Use in the Town Centre Area Plan. This designation allows
for a range of uses that are desired for the redevelopment of the Port Haney area. The adaptive re-use of heritage buildings is encouraged through policy 3-9 and this policy essentially
supports the flexibility that is achieved through a Heritage Revitalization Agreement and a Heritage Alteration Permit: 3-9 The adaptive re-use of heritage buildings and sites is encouraged,
by potentially converting a single-family use to a commercial or institutional use, or vice-versa (where land-use designation and appropriate zoning permits), or from a single-family
use to a duplex or multi-family use. This policy applies to buildings and/or sites that are determined by the District of Maple Ridge to have heritage value and/or heritage
-3 -character, including listings on the Maple Ridge Heritage Inventory or the Maple Ridge Heritage Register. The Port Haney Post Office building will operate as a coffee shop, serving
items such as coffee, tea and muffins during the early part of the day and operate as a full service restaurant from lunchtime to evening. Although the coffee-shop/restaurant will mostly
prepare snack food items, the owners also intend to install a pizza oven in the coffee shop/restaurant and this menu item will be available to patrons in both buildings. The attached
plans show a small 96 sq. ft. addition to the rear of the Port Haney Post Office building to accommodate the pizza oven. Additionally, some interior alterations are proposed that include:
1) Removing wall covering from two original window openings on the east facing wall; 2) Covering up an original window opening on the rear wall; 3) Creating a new opening on the rear
wall below the one being covered up to create an access to the pizza oven; and 4) Removing some of the building siding at the rear, which is necessary for the pizza oven installation.
Heritage Alteration Permit Section 972 of the Local Government Act enables a local government to permit alterations to a protected heritage site through a Heritage Alteration Permit.
Best practices for intended alterations to a heritage site are prescribed in the Standards & Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada publication, which was a collaborative
effort amongst the Federal, Provincial, and Territorial jurisdictions of Canada (see www.historicplaces.ca). On March 24, 2009, Council adopted the Standards & Guidelines for the Conservation
of Historic Places in Canada to be the guide for conservation of all protected heritage sites in Maple Ridge. Additionally, the Heritage Revitalization Agreement bylaw template developed
for Maple Ridge includes a requirement to follow the recommendations of the Standards & Guidelines document. Heritage Consultant Assessment: The proposed amendments have been reviewed
by a Heritage Consultant, Donald Luxton & Associates, who prepared the Statements of Significance (Appendix C) for the site. As shown in the attached Heritage Review report prepared
by Donald Luxton (Appendix D), new additions to a heritage building are categorized as a “rehabilitation” project in the Standards & Guidelines publication. In the report, the consultant
states that the addition proposed at the rear of the building “is the least intrusive to heritage value and heritage character-defining elements”. Additionally, he states that the appearance
of the addition being a “lean-to” structure “is appropriate to historic vernacular architecture”. His assessment of each building intervention is as follows: Lean-to Structure: It is
distinguished from the original structure through the use of a shed roof, pitched away from the rear façade. The appearance of the front and side facades of the original building will
not be affected, and the original brick chimney will be retained. Siding: Where necessary, the existing siding will be cut to allow the attachment of the addition. Siding will be examined
for suitability for salvage, and retained for re-use if possible. New wooden siding on the addition will match the original in profile, will have
-4 -matching cornerboards and will be painted in the same colour. There will be an interior opening to the pizza oven that will be framed in as required. Roofing: The new roofing will
be new low-profile duroid shingles to match the existing roof covering. New Venting: New metal venting will be used to vent the pizza oven that will be clearly distinguishable from
the original brick chimney. Windows: One original rear façade window will be removed and infilled. The upper window in the rear gable will not be affected. Two windows on the east side
of the building that are currently covered over will be opened up. The heritage consultant provided further information on how the addition will be made distinguishable from the original
building. His comments are as follows: “the intent is that the addition will be distinguishable through its form, which is that of an historic lean-to addition and clearly not part
of the original building. We do not wish to differentiate the siding as it will introduce a patch-work appearance that will be out of character with the historic construction. We therefore
wish to take a more subtle approach to distinguishability. The addition will be differentiated at close range as the surface texture of the new siding will also be smoother and have
less coats of paint than the earlier siding.” The consultant assessed the above proposed alterations with the list of character-defining elements identified in the attached Statement
of Significance and concluded that “none of the noted character-defining elements will be affected except for the removal of one window on the rear façade. This is considered to be
a minor intervention to overall heritage character”. The Standards & Guidelines publication was used by the heritage consultant to guide the assessment and the following statements
are a general summary of his comments on the conservation standards within the publication: The proposed work conforms and is acceptable. Heritage character-defining elements (CDEs)
have been determined in the Statement of Significance, and their heritage value is maintained by the proposed interventions. The proposed use allows retention of CDE’s and is a sensitive
adaptive use. It is required in the HRA bylaw that a “Registered Professional” oversee the work and complete a “Confirmation of Commitment” form, along with the property owner, that
confirms that the registered professional is fully aware of the standards and common practices of heritage conservation in British Columbia. Donald Luxton is a fellow of Architecture
Canada and a member of the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals. Mr. Luxton’s extensive heritage background and long history of heritage conservation project work in Maple
Ridge, including the Maple Ridge Heritage Inventory and many of the listings on the Maple Ridge Community Heritage Register have provided numerous examples of his Maple Ridge experience.
d) Advisory Design Panel: This addition to the historic Port Haney Post Office building is minor and not considered to be a significant project for review.
-5 -e) Intergovernmental Issues: As this heritage alteration project is considered to be minor in nature, by the heritage consultant, a referral to the BC Heritage Branch is not necessary.
f) Environmental Implications: None. g) Citizen/Customer Implications: Expanding the use of the Billy Miner Pub to include a family-oriented establishment in the historic Port Haney
Post Office, will help open up this area of town to a wider range of visitors and patrons. h) Financial Implications: None. CONCLUSION: Protecting the heritage value of the Billy Miner
Pub helps preserve the early days of Maple Ridge, and particularly Port Haney, for the community to experience and appreciate. The adoption of the Heritage Revitalization Agreement
Bylaw No. 6760-2010 permitted sufficient flexibility for the historic site to adapt to a new use. The intent of a Heritage Alteration Permit is similar to that of a Heritage Revitalization
Agreement, in that it permits adjustments to be made after the HRA bylaw is in place, thereby continuing to support the evolving uses of the site, while also continuing to protect the
site’s heritage value. _________________________________________________ Prepared by: Lisa Zosiak, Planner _____________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter,
M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services _________________________________________
______ Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Site Plan Appendix B – Plan Showing Proposed Alteration Appendix
C – Statements of Significance Appendix D – Heritage Consultant Assessment Appendix E -Confirmation of Commitment Form "Original signed by Lisa Zosiak" "Original signed by Christine
Carter" "Original signed by Frank Quinn" "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX C Click here to view fulldocument
Thursday, May 24, 2012 Attention: Lisa Zosiak Planner District of Maple Ridge Dear Ms. Zosiak; RE: 22355 River Road, Maple Ridge, B.C.: Heritage Review Please accept this letter of review
of compliance for a Heritage Alteration Permit for the proposed work on this protected heritage site, as follows: • Subject Property: The Port Haney Post Office: • Address: 22355 River
Road • Heritage Revitalization Agreement No. 6760-2010 My firm has been retained as Heritage Consultants for the project, and in addition to this Review will continue to monitor the
construction process, and will provide final sign-off as part of ongoing Construction Administration. This Heritage Review of the proposed Scope of Work has been conducted following
the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (2010) as well as the Statement of Significance as revised in 2010. Under the guidelines, the conservation
work proposed for the Port Haney Post Office is a rehabilitation intervention: Rehabilitation: the action or process of making possible a continuing or compatible contemporary use of
a historic place or an individual component, through repair, alterations, and/or additions, while protecting its heritage value. The rear of the building is proposed for a small addition
that will house a pizza oven and therefore improve the commercial functionality of the building. An intervention to the rear of the building is the least intrusive to heritage value
and heritage character-defining elements. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work includes a 96 square foot addition to the rear of the historic building. The appearance is that of a “lean-to”
addition that is appropriate to historic vernacular architecture. It is distinguished from the original structure through the use of a shed roof, pitched away from the rear façade.
The appearance of the front and side facades of the original building will not be affected, and the original brick chimney will be retained. APPENDIX D
Page 2 of 4 • Siding: Where necessary, the existing siding will be cut to allow the attachment of the addition. Siding will be examined for suitability for salvage, and retained for
reuse if possible. New wooden siding on the addition will match the original in profile, will have matching cornerboards and will be painted in the same colour. There will be an interior
opening to the pizza oven that will be framed in as required. • Roofing: The new roofing will be new low-profile duroid shingles to match the existing roof covering. • New Venting:
New metal venting will be used to vent the pizza over that will be clearly distinguishable from the original brick chimney. • Windows: One original rear façade window will be removed
and infilled. The upper window in the rear gable will not be affected. Two windows on the east side of the building that are currently covered over will be opened up. CONSERVATION STRATEGY
The primary intent is to conserve the existing historic structure, while undertaking a rehabilitation that will increase its functionality for new commercial uses. Rehabilitation is
therefore the primary intent of the interventions. The proposed intervention, a small addition at the rear, have been assessed against the Standards, and its impact on the historic
place has been assessed as follows. CONSERVATION STANDARD PROPOSED INTERVENTION GENERAL STANDARDS FOR ALL PROJECTS 22355 RIVER ROAD 1. Conserve the heritage value of a historic place.
Do not remove, replace, or substantially alter its intact or repairable characterdefining elements. Do not move a part of a historic place if its current location is a character-defining
element. The proposed work conforms and is acceptable. Heritage character-defining Elements (CDEs) have been determined in the Statement of Significance, and their heritage value is
maintained by the proposed interventions. 2. Conserve changes to a historic place, which over time, have become character-defining elements in their own right. The proposed work conforms
and is acceptable. 3. Conserve heritage value by adopting an approach calling for minimal intervention. The proposed work conforms and is acceptable. The proposed use allows retention
of CDEs and a sensitive adaptive reuse. 4. Recognize each historic place as a physical record of its time, place and use. Do not create a false sense of historical development by adding
elements from other historic places or other properties or by combining features of the same property that never coexisted. The proposed work conforms and is acceptable. 5. Find a use
for a historic place that requires minimal or no change to its character-defining elements. The proposed commercial use conforms to the historic nature of the building and is acceptable.
Page 3 of 4 6. Protect and, if necessary, stabilize a historic place until any subsequent intervention is undertaken. Protect and preserve archaeological resources in place. Where there
is potential for disturbance of archaeological resources, take mitigation measures to limit damage and loss of information. The proposed work conforms and is acceptable. There are no
known archaeological resources. 7. Evaluate the existing condition of character-defining elements to determine the appropriate intervention needed. Use the gentlest means possible for
any intervention. Respect heritage value when undertaking an intervention. The proposed work conforms and is acceptable. 8. Maintain character-defining elements on an ongoing basis.
Repair character-defining element by reinforcing the materials using recognized conservation methods. Replace in kind any extensively deteriorated or missing parts of character-defining
elements, where there are surviving prototypes. The proposed work conforms and is acceptable. 9. Make any intervention needed to preserve character-defining elements physically and
visually compatible with the historic place and identifiable upon close inspection. Document any intervention for future reference. The proposed work and level of documentation conforms
and is acceptable. ADDITIONAL STANDARDS RELATING TO REHABILITATION 22355 RIVER ROAD 10. Repair rather than replace character-defining elements. Where character-defining elements are
too severely deteriorated to repair, and where sufficient physical evidence exists, replace them with new elements that match the forms, materials and detailing of sound versions of
the same elements. Where there is insufficient physical evidence, make the form, material and detailing of the new elements compatible with the character of the historic place. The
proposed work conforms and is acceptable. 11. Conserve the heritage value and character-defining elements when creating any new additions to a historic place and any related new construction.
Make the new work physically and visually compatible with, subordinate to and distinguishable from the historic place. The proposed work conforms and is acceptable. 12. Create any new
additions or related new construction so that the essential form and integrity of a historic place will not be impaired if the new work is removed in the future. The proposed work conforms
and is acceptable. ADDITIONAL STANDARDS RELATING TO RESTORATION 22355 RIVER ROAD 13. Repair rather than replace character-defining elements from the restoration period. Where character-defining
elements are too severely deteriorated to repair and where sufficient physical evidence exists, replace them with new elements that match the forms, materials and detailing of sound
versions of the same elements. Not applicable to this rehabilitation project. 14. Replace missing features from the restoration period with new features whose forms, materials and detailing
are based on sufficient physical, documentary and/or oral evidence. Not applicable to this rehabilitation project.
Page 4 of 4 IMPACT TO HERITAGE CHARACTER-DEFINING ELEMENTS The following heritage character-defining elements were assessed as part of the analysis of heritage value in the Statement
of Significance prepared in 2010: Key elements that define the heritage character of the Port Haney Post Office include its: • original siting and orientation to the street, and its
proximate relationship to the railway and to an adjacent heritage structure • continuing commercial use • commercial form, scale and massing, including its one and one-‐ half-‐ storey
height, front gabled roof with a skirt roof at the front, rectangular floor plan and central front entry • wood-‐ frame construction including lapped wooden siding with cornerboards
• late influence of the Craftsman style including triangular eave brackets at the front and rear, open soffits and exposed rafter tails • internal red-‐ brick chimney with corbelled
top • original windows including double-‐ assembly, double-‐ hung wooden-‐ sash windows on the east side, and • 4-‐ paned double sliding windows at the rear As noted, none of the
noted character-defining elements will be affected except for the removal of one window on the rear façade. This is considered to be a minor intervention to overall heritage character.
OVERALL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS Based on this assessment, the proposed interventions to the character-defining elements of the Port Haney Post Office, 22355 River Road,
Maple Ridge, will not be significantly impacted by the proposed interventions, and the heritage value of the structure will be maintained. Please let me know if you have any questions
about this review. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, Donald Luxton, FRAIC, Principal Donald Luxton & Associates Inc.
SCHEDULEF CONFIRMAnON OF COMMITMENT BY OWNER AND COORDINATING REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL This letter must be submitted before issuan(~e of a Heritage Alteration Permit or 1I building pennit.
To: TJU: J)[STRICT OF MAI-LE RIDGE (the authority having jurisdiction) Re: THE BANK OF MONTREAL AND THE PORT HANEY POST OFFICE Address r,7 The undersigned has retained ~CVA~Z._~.{f)c1'GJ~.
___ as a coordinating registered professional with experience ill hclitage conservation to coordinate the design work and field reviews of the registered professionals required l for
this heritage project. The coordinating registered professionaJ shall coordinate the design work and field reviews of the registered professkmal required for the proj{~Ct in order to
ascertain that the design wil! substantially comply with the protection, restoration, andlor rehabilitation of the Character-Defining Elements listed in the Statements of Significance
for the Bank or Montreal and the Port Haney Post Office. The tools that will be used to support tillS heritage conservation work arc the: 1) Standards and Guiddil1esfor Ille Con:,;en'tltion
(~r Historic Places in Canada; 2) B.C. Building Code; 3) and other applicable enactments respecting safety, not including the construction safety aspects. For this project, field reviews
are defined as those reviews of the work: a) at a project site of a development to which a Hcrita.ge Alteration Permit relates, and b) at fabrication location where building components
are made that will replace deteriorated materials identified a;:; character-defining elements for this prnject. That a registered professional in his or her professional discretion
considers necessary to ascertain whether t.he work suh~tantially complies in all matclial respects with the plans and supporting documents prepared by the registered professional and
with the Heritage Designation and Revitalization Agreement Bylaw No. 6760-2010, for which the Heritage Alteration Permit is issued. The owner and the coordinating registered professional
have read the Statements of Significance for the Bank of Montreaf and the Port Haney Post Office, and the Slallcionis and Guidelines for the Conservation of HL~toric Places ill Canada..
The owner and the coordinating registered profe:;sional each acknowledge their responsibility to notify the addressee of this letter of the dale the coordinating registered professiona!
ceases to be retained by the owner before the date that the coordinating registered profc,ssional ceases to be reta.incd or. if IhM is not possible, then as soon as possible. The coordinating
registered professiullnl ucknowledgcs the responsibility to notify the addressee of this letter of the date a 1 lL is the fe~p()nsibi!ity of the coordi nating registered professional
to ascertain which registered professionals are required. APPENDIX E
registered professional cea&es to be retained before the date the registered professional ceases to be retained or, if that is not possible. then as soon as possible. The owner and the
coordinating registered professional understand that where the coordinating registered professional or a registered professional ceases to be retained al any time during constrllction,
work on the above project will cease until Sllch time as: a) a new coordimlting professional or registered professional, as the case may be, is retained, and b) a new letter in the
Conn set out in Schedule D in the Heritage Designation and Revitalization Agreement Bylaw No. 6760-2010, is filled with the authority having jurisdiction. Tbe undersigned coordinating
registered professional certifies that he or she is a registered professional as defined in the British Columbia Building Code, who also has experience with heritage conservation projects
and agrees to coordinate the design work and field reviews of the registered professionals required for the project as outlined in the attached plans and specifications. CoordInating
Registered. Professional ~At,..D . L).)")(.roO\l Name (please Print) .[ a~e of Agent or s:g~Otlice (if applicable) _~L 4Al/?_-_ Date Owners appointed agent's signature (if o\\mer is
,.1 corporatioll the signature 01';1 signing ofllcer must be given here. If the signature is that of the agent. a copy of the document that app()im~ the agent must be artached.} (if
the C(Klrdinating registered professional is a member of a tinn, pkese compl.elc the !()llowing) I am a member of the firm .~.p UJ~..:t..A:ss ac...J.....~-'--and I sign this letter
on behalf of the firm. i L".~._~.. . ...._ .. _.~. .._~._~.... __ ........_ V\'\&-\A 3 12 !O..~l2__ Date I J
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: June 4, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: DVP/075/10 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Development
Variance Permit 10455 and 10481 245B Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Development Variance Permit application has been received in support of subdivision application SD/075/10. The application
is for an 11 lot RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) subdivision for three properties located at 10455, 10469 and 10481 245B Street. This Development Variance Permit
is for two of the properties (10455 and 10481 245B Street) only. The purpose of the Development Variance Permit is to vary the minimum lot width for the lots fronting 245 Street to
14.34 metres rather than the proposed RS-1b zone minimum lot width of 15 metres. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/075/10 respecting properties
located at 10455 and 10481 245B Street. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Don Schmidt Owners: Janice and Brian Ahonen Rebecca Awram Legal Description: Lots 2 and 4, Sections
10 and 11, Township 12, NWD Plan 72100 OCP : Existing: Low/Medium Density Residential Proposed: Low/Medium Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation:
Low Medium Density Residential 1107
-2 -South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Low Medium Density Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One
Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Low Medium Density Residential West: Use: School Zone: P-1 (Park and School) Designation: Institutional Existing Use of Property: Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Residential Site Area: 1.2 hectares (2.96 acres) Access: 245 and 245B Street Companion Applications: RZ/075/10, SD/075/10, 2011-032-DP Requested Variance:
Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985: Schedule D –RS-1b: To vary the minimum lot width from 15 metres to 14.34 metres for lots 1, 2, 3, 6,7 and 8. b) Project Description: The applicant has applied
to rezone three properties located at 10455, 10469, and 10481 245B Street from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit
eight new lots on the 245 Street frontage and retain the existing dwellings on three large lots fronting 245B Street. As part of the subdivision process, the applicant is seeking a
lot width variance on lots 1,2,3,6,7 and 8 (existing 10455 and 10481 245B Street) to preserve the existing hedging and a storm right-of-way identified as a watercourse situated between
proposed lots 5 and 6. The proposed variance is to allow a 14.34 metre lot width rather than the minimum lot width of 15 metres for six proposed lots on two of the three parent properties.
Currently, there is a significant hedge along the property lines of lots 1,3,4,9 and 11, and a storm right-of-way on the south property line of lot 5 and 10. The Environmental Consultant
has identified that the open channel within the storm right-of-way is a watercourse due to its role in conveying nutrients to downstream fish bearing systems. Without the lot width
variance, some hedging and the watercourse would be impacted. By keeping the existing property lines, the hedging and watercourse can be preserved. The applicant has completed a Watercourse
Protection Development Permit and will be registering a tree protection covenant to preserve a number of hedge stems and significant trees on the development site and widen the storm
right-of-way to allow for future maintenance access to the open channel. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject sites are designated Low Medium Density Residential
in the Albion Area Plan and the proposed RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zoning complies with this designation.
-3 -Zoning Bylaw: The proposed lots meet the minimum zoning requirements for lot area and lot depth in the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone. The lot width variance
for six of the 11 proposed lots from 15 to 14.34 metres is the only requested variance. d) Alternatives: Instead of permitting the lot width variance, the proposed subdivision plan
for eight lots on 245 Street could be revised to satisfy the minimum lot width; however, the existing hedging and watercourse could not be retained. Alternatively, the subdivision plan
could be revised to satisfy the minimum lot width and be designed to maintain the existing hedging and watercourse In this case the lot yield would be reduced. CONCLUSION: The development
variance request is for less than a metre reduction in lot width and facilitates preservation of significant hedging and a watercourse. Therefore, it is recommended that Development
Variance Permit DVP/075/10 be approved. _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Amelia Bowden Planning Technician _______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, MCP, MCIP Director of Planning _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________ Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AB/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Subdivision Layout Appendix C – Tree Protection Plan "Original signed by Amelia Bowden" "Original signed by Christine Carter" "Original signed by Frank Quinn" "Original
signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 04, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-019-DP/DVP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of
W SUBJECT: Development Permit & Development Variance Permit 11378 Kingston Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Development Permit and Development Variance Permit applications have been received
for the subject site to support a proposed multi-tenant Industrial building in the M-3 (Business Park) zone. This is a zoned site and the M-3 (Business Park) zone permits a variety
of industrial uses. The Development Permit application is to regulate the form and character of the proposed industrial building and the Development Variance Permit application is to
vary some setbacks facing 113B Avenue and Kingston Street as described in this report. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012/DVP/019 respecting
property located at 11378 Kingston Street; and further That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012/DP/019 respecting property located at 11378 Kingston Street. DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context: Applicant: Rudy Giovanni, Adriatic Construction Commercial Ltd. Owner: Marinelli Investments(Kingston) Ltd. Legal Description: Lot: 35, Group: 1; D.L.: 280, Plan:
86659; PID: 016-470-087 OCP: Existing: Industrial Proposed: Industrial Zoning: Existing: M-3 (Business Park) Proposed: M-3 (Business Park) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Industrial and
113B Avenue Zone: M-3 (Business Park) Designation: Industrial 1108
-2 -South: Use: Industrial Zone: M-3 (Business Park) Designation: Industrial East: Use: Industrial Zone: M-3 (Business Park) Designation: Industrial West: Use: Industrial and Kingston
Street Zone: M-3 (Business Park) Designation: Industrial Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: Multi-tenanted Industrial building Access: Kingston Street Servicing:
Full Urban Previous Applications: None b) Project Description: The subject site (Appendix A), 2460 m2 in area is located in the Maple Meadows Industrial Park in west Maple Ridge and
is subject to the Industrial Development Permit Guidelines as outlined in the Official Community Plan. The site is located within the flood plain and thus will be required to register
a flood plain covenant at the Building permit stage. The proposed building is a concrete tilt-up structure with some steel and glass façade and stone veneer cladding along the base
of each unit entrance. The proposed building is approximately 1176.80 m2 (12,667 ft2) in area and is 8.61 metres in height. A future partial mezanine floor may be added in the future.
The loading doors for each unit and all the parking is proposed to the south of the proposed structure, with vehicular access into the parking area provided from Kingston Street. It
is anticipated to be a multi-tenanted building with six industrial units, 22 parking stalls and six loading bays. Garbage and recycling is proposed in the south-east corner of the site,
enclosed by a post and rail fence. Proposed landscaping includes some street trees facing Kingston street and 113B Avenue bordered by a decorative allan block retaining wall, sodded
boulevard, permeable concrete pavers on the amenity patio, concrete walkways from both the streets, concrete picnic table and bike racks for visitors. The Preliminary Stormwater Management
Plan (Appendix E) proposes installing a stormtech chamber system under the parking area and rock pit filtration system. c) Planning Analysis: The purpose of the Industrial Development
Permit is to promote quality Industrial development through attractive design that is compatible with adjacent development and conforms to the Official Community Plan guidelines. Applications
for Development Permits are assessed against the following Key Design concepts, as follows: 1. Provide a street presence with entrances and architectural interest in building designs
fronting public streets.
-3 -Proposed landscaping fronting 113B Avenue and Kingston Street is an effort to provide better street presence and soften the hard surfaces of the structure. The façade facing 113B
Avenue is staggered to avoid monotony and present a well articulated streetscape (Appendix C). Pedestrian connectivity is enhanced from both the streets by walkways and to the parking/garbage
enclosure with a concrete paver walkway along the eastern property boundary. Concrete sidewalk accesses from 113B Avenue and Kingston Street improve overall pedestrian connectivity
(Appendix B). The proposed materials such as concrete tilt up, glass and steel panels for the façade with stone veneer cladding at prominent areas are anticipated to create articulated
architectural facades fronting both the streets (Appendix C). 2. Loading facilities should be located away from public streets and into the rear or the interior of a site. The proposed
loading doors for each unit face south as shown on the Site Plan, away from the 113B Avenue (Appendix B) and the public realms. 3. Outdoor storage and less attractive structures such
as accessory buildings should be screened with fencing or landscape. All their storage areas are located inside the units as this is anticipated to be multi-tenanted. There are no accessory
buildings proposed. The garbage enclosure is screened by a six feet tall, post and rail fence as shown on the landscaping plan (Appendix D). 4. The transportation needs of diverse users
should be accommodated through amenities such as bicycle facilities and accessible design for the mobility impaired. This structure is anticipated to be a multi-tenanted industrial
building, so the owner has proposed 22 parking stalls instead of the required 19 stalls. A handicapped parking spot is also provided at the parking entrance as shown on the Site Plan
(Appendix B). A bicycle rack is proposed facing Kingston Street close to the secondary building entrance. 5. The form and treatment of new buildings should reflect the desired character
and pattern of development in the area by incorporating appropriate architectural styles, features, materials, proportions and building articulation. Most buildings in the vicinity
were built prior to the current Official Community Plan industrial guidelines adopted in 2006. This building proposes an attractive, well articulated building façade along both the
street frontages. Proposed mezzanine floor glazing fenestrations are complementary to the raised parapet detailing and steel roof canopies, while the steel and glass entrance canopies
maintain a functional continuity. Stone cladding on bases of the unit front facades adds to the entry statement (Appendix C). Zoning Bylaw: The subject site is zoned M-3 (Business park).
The project is in compliance with the maximum permitted lot coverage, height and parking required for this zone. The applicant is seeking some setback variances to the building facades
facing both 113B Avenue and Kingston Street and canopies facing 113B Avenue and Kingston Street as described below.
-4 -d) Variances to the Zoning Bylaw: The applicant is seeking the following variances: i) Part 8, Section 803(6) (a) of the M-3 zone (Business Park) of the Zoning Bylaw, to vary the
front yard setback (facing 113B Avenue) to the building façade from 6.0 metres to 3.0 metres; ii) Part 8, Section 803(6) (d) of the M-3 zone (Business Park) of the Zoning Bylaw, to
vary the exterior side yard setback (facing Kingston Street) from 4.5 metres to 4.29 metres; iii) Part 4, Section 403 (4)(b)(1) of the Zoning Bylaw, to vary the siting of the front
yard canopies (facing 113B Avenue) from 4.75 metres to 1.70 metres; iv) Part 4, Section 403 (4)(b)(1) of the Zoning Bylaw, to vary the siting of the exterior side yard canopies (facing
Kingston Street) from 3.25 metres to 2.99 metres. The setback variances proposed for the building façade facing 113B Avenue and Kingston Street are with an intention of providing the
parking behind the building, offering a better street presence by staggering the units and enhancing the urban streetscape. The canopies are proposed only above the entrance doors to
provide weather protection for each unit at intermittent locations and not along the full horizontal length of the facades. These variances are not anticipated to negatively impact
any neigbours. e) Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: As per the Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw, an industrial use in the M-3 (Business Park) zone requires 1 parking
space per 93 m2 gross floor area giving a total of 19 parking spaces required. The applicant has proposed 22 parking spaces (including one handicapped parking space) and six loading
bays with an intention of providing adequate number of spaces per unit for a multitenanted facility like this one. f) Advisory Design Panel: On April 10, 2012 the Advisory Design Panel
reviewed the proposed development and recommended the the application be supported and the following concerns be addressed as the design develops and submitted to Planning staff for
follow up: Consider a pedestrian access from Kingston Street to the side entrance; Consider adding a dedicated pathway on the east side that connects to the waste and recycling
enclosure; Consider expanding or increasing the planting around the property line to formalize the layout and provide a green edge or step the landscaping with the sidewalk; Coordinate
the street tree locations with the hydro pole boxes; Consider continuation of the stone treatment on the north elevation; Provide detail for the building exterior lighting plans;
Consider a planting screen or hand rail around the amenity area. The applicant has revised the proposed drawings to accommodate these concerns.
-5 -g) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department have reviewed the proposal and confirmed that all the off-site services exist in this area.
Fire Department: The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and comments have been provided to the applicant. The applicant has ensured that all these will be addressed through the
Building Permit drawings. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the Development Permit is completed they will be responsible
for maintaining the street trees. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements. Building
Department: The Building Department has reviewed the proposal and comments have been provided to the applicant. The applicant has ensured that all these will be addressed through the
Building Permit drawings to comply with the code requirements. h) Citizen/Customer Implications: The mail-outs to inform residents of the proposed variances were mailed 10 days prior
to the anticipated Council Meeting date (i.e. June 12, 2012). Concerned residents in the neighbourhood have had the opportunity to voice their opinions. i) Financial Implications: In
accordance with Council’s Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of the estimated landscape cost will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping
in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on a cost-estimate provided by the Landscape Architect, the security will be $ 16,245.00 payable prior to
the issuance of a Development Permit. j) Alternatives: As per Section 8.6 of the Official Community Plan, an Industrial Development Permit is required for all new industrial development
within the urban area on lands designated “Industrial” on Schedule B of the Official Community Plan. The subject site, designated “Industrial” on Schedule B, prior to a Building Permit
application, requires Council approval of an Industrial Development Permit. This is a zoned site.
-6 -CONCLUSION: The proposed Industrial building follows the OCP’s Industrial design guidelines and will provide new employment opportunities for the community. The proposed setback
variances are minor in nature and not anticipated to negatively impact any neighbours. Therefore it is recommended that 2012-019-DP and 2012-019-VP be approved for issuance. ________________________
_______________________ Prepared by: Rasika Acharya, B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED® AP, MCIP Planner _____________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP
Director of Planning _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services _______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject map Appendix B – Site Plan Appendix C – Building Elevations
& Sections Appendix D – Landscape Plan Appendix E – Preliminary Storm water Management and Erosion Sediment Control Plan "Original signed by Christine Carter" "Original signed by Frank
Quinn" "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" "Original signed by Rasika Acharya"
City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley District of Mission FRASER R. ^ DATE: May 7, 2012 FILE: 2012-019-DP BY: PC 11378 KINGSTON STREET CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT 201 27 11455 11410 11443 11469 11442 20124 20142 20159 20165 20091 11405 11450 20172 11378 11475 20071 20070 11476 11430 20050 20161 20060 20066 1131511393 20119 11435 11470
20163 113 B AVE. KINGSTON ST. 201 A ST. Lot 1 LMP 41075 BCP 32752 P 86659 LMS 1635 10 9 Rem 7 LOT 1 538 2 P 15901F 5 6 21 25 27 LMS 2909 P 86659 26 P 86659 31 Rem H Pcl. 3 Pcl. 2 35LMS
3846LMP 25176 LMS 2889 LMP 24825 BCP 45137 4 22 P 86659 Pcl. 1 P 86659 LMS 2547Pcl. A 1 Rem 8 A P 86659 LMS 3029 LMP 25175 P 86659 28 539 540 LM P 88 SUBJECT PROPERTY ´SCALE 1:2,000
APPENDIX A
1109 District of Maple Ridge MEMORANDUM TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 and Members of Council FROM: Liz Holitzki, MEETING: Committee of the Whole Director
of Licences, Permits & Bylaws SUBJECT: Proposed Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 The purpose of this memorandum is to provide Council with an updated Recommendation to the one put forth
at the Council Workshop of April 30, 2012. At the Council Workshop the approved recommendation was to forward the attached report to a future Committee of the Whole. The report and
proposed Bylaw are attached to this memo for Council’s consideration and approval of three readings. RECOMMENDATION(S): That Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 be read a first,
second and third time. There have been no changes made to the Council report of April 30, 2012 or to the proposed Bylaw since it’s submission to Council Workshop of April 30, 2012.
“Original signed by Liz Holitzki” _______________________________________________ Liz Holitzki, Director of Licences, Permits & Bylaws
Page 1 of 2 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: April 30, 2012 and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council Workshop SUBJECT:
New Building Bylaw 6925-2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The current Building Bylaw was adopted in 2003. Since then, the Provincial Government has adopted a new BC Building Code, the new Safety
Standards Act of BC, the Safety Standards Electrical and Gas Regulations and the new Provincial Sewerage Regulations and their ongoing amendments. A new updated bylaw is required to
provide consistency with these new regulations. The Bylaw (attached as Appendix I) is drafted to include regulatory wording intended to decrease the risk of potential liability to the
District associated with the monitoring of building, plumbing, gas and electrical work carried on within the District of Maple Ridge. The adoption of the new proposed Bylaw will allow
for the repeal of the existing outdated Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003. It is intended that following Council’s review at Workshop of the Bylaw will be forwarded to Committee of the Whole.
RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6925 -2012 be referred to a future Committee of the Whole. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The attached Building Bylaw clarifies
and defines the roles and responsibilities of municipal building officials, professional engineers, architects and owners in terms of construction works carried on within the District
of Maple Ridge. Emphasis has been placed on design professionals, project coordinators, contractors and owners to provide proper design and construction details related to their permit
application. Also, emphasis will be placed on professional engineers and architects to conduct field reviews and provide certification ensuring complex buildings meet the BC Building
Code requirements. Municipal building officials monitor the progress of construction and ensure that professional certification has been received. The fee structure within the proposed
Bylaw has not been changed or amended since 1998 and requires updating to meet the actual cost of providing the service. However, at this time the main focus is on brining in the new
legislation governing the permitting process and therefore staff will bring a further report back to Council recommending amendments to the fee structure. Since the adoption of our
current Building Bylaw 6180 – 2003 the Province has implemented the new BC Safety Standards Act and Regulations. The Draft Bylaw has been crafted with 4.3
Page 2 of 2 appropriate references to that Act and Regulations relating to Gas and Electrical Safety Standards that we are mandated to deliver to our citizens. The Sewerage regulation
has also come into effect since the adoption of the current Building Bylaw and the Draft Building Bylaw makes appropriate references to that regulation. The current BC Building Code
was adopted at the end of December 2006 and the Draft Building Bylaw has been written to incorporate revised design data specifically determined appropriate for our municipality. The
Bylaw has also been amended to reflect the ongoing changes to the BC Building Code that have occurred since it adoption by the province including amendments that deal with solar ready
heating requirements in all new construction. b) Citizen/Customer Implications: The revisions incorporated within the Draft Building Bylaw have been discussed at our Builders Forums.
However, the base rate charges for all permit fees have not been reviewed since 1998. This review will be the subject of a future report. CONCLUSIONS: The attached Building Bylaw has
been prepared to clearly outline the roles and responsibilities of all parties involved in the building construction process. The majority of the changes are “housekeeping” amendments.
The proposed Bylaw will ensure the District continues to require that all the aspects of construction that relate to health, safety and the protection of persons and property be carried
on in an appropriate manner as specified in the new Building Bylaw. The permit fee structure within the proposed Bylaw has not been changed. _______________________________________________
Prepared by: E. S. (Liz) Holitzki Director: Licences, Permits and Bylaws ___________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng General Manager, Public Works
& Development Services ____________________________________________ Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Office H/jd L "Original signed by E.S. (Liz) Holitzki" "Original
signed by Frank Quinn" "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
Appendix I DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Building Bylaw No. 6925 -2012 A Bylaw to regulate the Construction, alteration, repair, demolition or moving of buildings and Structures and the installation,
alteration or repair of plumbing, electrical working and equipment and gas piping, fittings and appliances in the Municipality of Maple Ridge WHEREAS section 692 (1) and (2) of the
Local Government Act authorizes the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, for the health, safety and protection of persons and property to regulate the Construction, alteration,
repair, or demolition of buildings and Structures by bylaw; AND WHEREAS the Province of British Columbia has adopted a building code to govern standards in respect of the Construction,
alteration, repair and demolition of buildings in municipalities and regional districts in the Province; AND WHEREAS it is deemed necessary to provide for the administration of the
building code; NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. Citation This bylaw be cited as the “Maple
Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6925 -2012” and; That “Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180 – 2003” as amended be repealed in its entirety. 2. Definitions In this bylaw: The following words
and terms have the meanings set out in the current edition of the British Columbia Building Code: assembly occupancy, Building, Building area, Building height, business and personal
services occupancy, care or detention occupancy, Constructor, coordinating registered professional, designer, field review, high hazard industrial occupancy, industrial occupancy, low
hazard industrial occupancy, major occupancy, mercantile occupancy, medium hazard industrial occupancy, occupancy, owner, plumbing system, registered professional, registered professional
of record, and residential occupancy. The following term has the same meaning as set out under Section 55 of the Community Charter: Qualified Professional The words and terms in Bold
below have the following meanings: “Accessory Building” means a Building which is customarily incidental, subordinate and exclusively devoted to the uses contained within the principal
Building; “Agent” means a person appointed as an agent in writing by the owner of the Premises authorizing such person to make application for a Building Permit or Occupancy Permit
pursuant to this Bylaw and to act for the Owner pursuant to this Bylaw;
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 2 of 45 “B.C. Gas Safety Code” means the standards of the Canadian Gas Association and amendments thereto as adopted by the B.C. Safety Standards Act
and Gas Safety Regulation pursuant thereto; “Building Code” means the British Columbia Building Code current edition as adopted by the Minister pursuant to section 692 (1) of the Local
Government Act, as amended or reenacted from time to time. “Building Official” includes The Chief Building Official, Building Inspectors, Gas/Plumbing Inspectors, Electrical Inspectors,
Trades Inspectors, Safety Officers and Plan Checkers designated by the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge. "CC" -means the Community Charter [SBC 2003] Chapter 26 as amended
or re-enacted from time to time. “Chief Building Official” is the Manager of Inspection Services /Local Safety Manager and includes those Building Officials as designated by the Manager
of Inspection Services and the Director of Licensing, Permits and Bylaws. “Complex Building” means: 2.1 all Buildings used for major occupancies classified as 2.1.1 assembly occupancies,
2.1.2 care or detention occupancies, 2.1.3 high hazard industrial occupancies, and 2.2 all Buildings exceeding 600 square metres in Building area or exceeding three storeys in Building
height used for major occupancies classified as 2.2.1 residential occupancies, 2.2.2 business and personal services occupancies, 2.2.3 mercantile occupancies, 2.2.4 medium and low hazard
industrial occupancies; “Construct” includes erect, install, replace, alter, enlarge, demolish, repair or move and any excavation (excavation as defined in the B.C. Building Code);
“Construction” means the erection alteration, replacement, addition, removal, moving and demolition of Buildings, Structures and of all appurtenances thereto including without limitation,
Plumbing, sewer, drainage, septic, heating, air conditioning, electrical, gas, oil and other systems, fittings, appliances and accessories of every nature and kind, and includes all
site preparation, excavation, filling and grading;
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 3 of 45 “Corporation” means the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge; “Council” means the Municipal Council of the Corporation; “Electrical Code”
means all those parts of the current Canadian Electrical Code CSA Standard C22.1-02 including errata forming the B.C. Electrical Code and Electrical Safety Regulation enacted by the
B.C. Safety Standards Act; “Electrical Equipment” means Electrical Equipment as defined in the Electrical Code; “Gas Equipment” shall have the same meaning as that term defined in the
Gas Safety Regulation forming part of the BC Safety Standards Act; “Health and Safety Aspects of The Work” means design and Construction regulated by Part 3, Part 4, and sections 9.1,
9.4, 9.5, 9.8, 9.9, 9.10, 9.12, 9.14, 9.15, 9.17, 9.18, 9.20, 9.21, 9.22, 9.23, 9.24, 9.31, 9.32, and 9.35 of Part 9 of the Building Code; “Non Inhabitable” means an accessory residential
Building which has no cooking, or kitchen counter/cupboard facilities, bathing, or sleeping facilities and which is used solely as an Accessory Building for storage or work shop purposes;
“Permit” includes a Building Permit, Occupancy Permit, Gas Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and all other Permits required by this Bylaw; “Plumbing” means any system or arrangement
of one or more pipes, including fittings and appliances attached thereto, in or upon any Premises, installed for the purpose of supplying such Premises with potable water or for the
conducting or carrying away of waste water or of rain or surface water, including any required vent pipes and including sprinkler systems and irrigation systems; “Pond”-means any manufactured
or constructed body of water of any size, which is installed as a landscaping feature and is not intended for the purposes of swimming bathing or human occupation. “Pool” means any
manufactured or constructed swimming Pool having the capacity to contain water at a depth exceeding 450mm or with a water surface area exceeding 14 square metres. A Pool includes any
fence or other enclosing Structure, all Plumbing and appurtenances necessary or convenient to the use of the Pool, but does not include selfcontained hot tubs with a locking cover;
“Premises” includes any parcel of land together with all Buildings or Structures located thereon; “Simple Building” means Buildings of three storeys or less in Building height, having
a Building area not exceeding 600 square metres and used for major occupancies classified as 2.3 residential occupancies, 2.4 business and personal services occupancies, 2.5 mercantile
occupancies, or
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 4 of 45 2.6 medium and low hazard industrial occupancies; “Structure” means a Construction or portion thereof of any kind, whether fixed to, supported
by or sunk into land or water, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes any pad or base of concrete, asphalt or other material designed to support or actually supporting
a mobile home; but specifically excludes landscaping, paving, decks less than 0.5 metres in height with no roofs and retaining Structures less than 0.5 metres in height; “Temporary”
means a period of time not exceeding 12 months; “Temporary Building” means a Building that has been granted approval for a fixed and limited time not exceeding the expiration date of
the authorizing Building Permit; “Temporary Residential Use” means a temporary dwelling unit for the accommodation of a relative of the property Owner. 3. Purpose of Bylaw 3.1 This
bylaw, shall, notwithstanding any other provision herein, be interpreted in accordance with this section. 3.2 This bylaw is enacted and retained for the purpose of regulating Construction
within the Corporation in the general public interest. The activities undertaken by or on behalf of the Corporation pursuant to this bylaw are for the sole purpose of providing a limited
spot check for health, safety and the protection of persons and property. It is not contemplated nor intended, nor does the purpose of this bylaw extend: 3.2.1 to the protection of
owners, owner/builders or Constructors from economic loss; 3.2.2 to the assumption by the Corporation of any responsibility for ensuring the compliance by any owners, his or her representatives
or any employees, Constructors or designers retained by him or her, with the Building Code, the requirements of this bylaw or any other applicable codes or standards; 3.2.3 to providing
any person a warranty of design or workmanship with respect to any Building or Structure for which a permit or occupancy permit is issued under this bylaw; 3.2.4 to providing a warranty
or assurance that Construction undertaken pursuant to permits issued by the Corporation is free from latent, or any defects. 4. Permit Conditions 4.1 A permit is required whenever work
regulated under this bylaw is to be undertaken. 4.2 Neither the issuance of a permit under this bylaw nor the acceptance or review of plans, drawings or specifications or supporting
documents, nor any inspections made by or on behalf of the Corporation shall in any way relieve the owner or his or her
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 5 of 45 representatives from full and sole responsibility to perform the work in strict accordance with the Building Code, this bylaw and all other
codes, standards and applicable enactments. 4.3 It shall be the full and sole responsibility of the owner (and where the owner is acting through a representative, the representative)
to carry out the work in respect of which the permit was issued in compliance with the Building Code, this bylaw and all other applicable codes, standards and enactments. 4.4 Neither
the issuance of a permit under this bylaw, the review and acceptance of the design, drawings, plans or specifications, nor inspections made by a Building Official, shall constitute
a representation or warranty that the Building Code or the bylaw have been complied with or the Building or Structure meets any standard of materials or workmanship, and no person shall
rely on any of those acts as establishing compliance with the Building Code or this bylaw or any standard of Construction. 5. Scope and Exemptions 5.1 This bylaw applies to the design,
Construction and occupancy of new Buildings and Structures, and the alteration, re-Construction, demolition, removal, relocation and occupancy of existing Buildings and Structures.
5.2 This bylaw does not apply to Buildings or Structures exempted by Division A -Part 1 of the Building Code except as expressly provided herein. 6. Prohibitions 6.1 No person shall
commence or continue or suffer or permit the commencement or continuance of any Construction, alteration, reconstruction, demolition, removal or relocation of any Building or Structure,
including excavation or other work related to Construction unless a Building Official has issued a valid and subsisting permit for the work. 6.2 No person shall demolish of suffer or
permit the demolition of a Building or Structure unless a Building Official has issued a valid and subsisting demolition permit for the demolition. 6.3 No person shall move or suffer
or permit the movement of a Building or Structure unless a valid and subsisting moving permit has been issued by a Building Official for the moving of the Building or Structure. 6.4
No person shall occupy or use or suffer or permit the occupancy or use of any Building or Structure unless a valid and subsisting occupancy permit has been issued by the Chief Building
Official in accordance with sections 23.1 to 23.8 of this bylaw for the Building or Structure, or contrary to the terms of any permit issued or any notice given by the Chief Building
Official. 6.5 No person shall or suffer or permit, unless authorized in writing by the Chief Building Official, reverse, alter, deface, cover, remove or in any way tamper with any notice,
permit or certificate posted upon or affixed to a Building or Structure pursuant to this bylaw.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 6 of 45 6.6 No person shall or suffer or permit any work that is substantially at variance with the approved design, plans or specifications of a Building,
Structure or other works for which a permit has been issued, unless that variance has been accepted in writing by a Building Official. 6.7 No person shall or suffer or permit the obstruction
of the entry of a Building Official or other authorized official of the Corporation on property in the administration of this bylaw. 7. Building Officials 7.1 The Chief Building Official:
7.1.1 shall administer this bylaw; 7.1.2 shall keep records of permit applications, permits, notices and orders issued, issues Permits for the purposes mentioned in this Bylaw, inspections
and tests made, and shall retain copies of all documents related to the administration of this bylaw or microfilm copies of such documents, or retain by any other acceptable means,
copies of such documents; 7.1.3 may establish, if requested to do so, whether the methods or types of Construction and types of materials used in the Construction of a Building or Structure
substantially conform to the requirements of the Building Code; 7.1.4 is designated Local Safety Manager for Electrical and Gas Safety Regulations in accordance with the Safety Standards
Act of BC, as amended; 7.1.5 may appoint Building Officials who shall be responsible to the Chief Building Official and shall assist in the administration of this bylaw. 7.2 A Building
Official: 7.2.1 may enter any land, Building or Premises at any reasonable time for the purpose of ascertaining the terms of this bylaw are being observed; 7.2.2 shall, where any residence
is occupied, obtain the consent of the occupant or provide written notice to the occupant 24 hours in advance of entry; and 7.2.3 shall carry proper credentials confirming his or her
status as a Building Official. 7.3 A Building Official may order the correction of any work that is being or has been done in contravention of this bylaw. 8. Applications 8.1 Every
person shall apply for and obtain: 8.1.1 a permit before constructing, repairing or altering a Building, a Structure, Plumbing works per Section 29, Gas works per Section 30, and/or
Electrical
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 7 of 45 works per Section 31. A permit shall be in the form provided by the Chief Building Official and, if applicable, to be in accordance with section
11.1 of this bylaw. Each Building or Structure to be constructed on a site requires a separate building permit and shall be assessed a separate building permit fee based on the value
of that Building or Structure as determined in accordance with Appendix “A” to this bylaw; 8.1.2 a moving permit before moving a Building or Structure; A moving permit shall be in the
form provided by the Chief Building Official; 8.1.3 a demolition permit before demolishing a Building or Structure; A demolition permit shall be in the form provided by the Chief Building
Official; 8.1.4 a fireplace and chimney permit prior to the Construction of a masonry fireplace or the installation of a wood burning appliance or chimney unless the works are encompassed
by a valid building permit. A fireplace and chimney permit shall be in the form provided by the Chief Building Official. 8.2 Application Exceptions Except as herein specifically provided,
where a Building or Structure or any part thereof has been constructed prior to the adoption of this Bylaw, such Building or Structure or part thereof shall not be required to be altered
to comply herewith: 8.2.1 Where a Building or Structure or any part thereof is demolished or removed, this bylaw applies to any part of the Building or Structure which remains on the
Premises and to all Construction done in connection with the demolition or removal thereof; 8.2.2 Where a Building or Structure or any part thereof is moved to a site within the Municipality,
this Bylaw applies to any part of the Building or Structure which is moved and to all Construction done in connection with the relocation thereof; 8.2.3 Where the class of occupancy
or use, as defined in the Building Code, of a Building or any part thereof is changed, this Bylaw applies to any part of the Building affected by the change; 8.2.4 Where a Building
is damaged by any cause to the extent of more than fifty percent (50%) of its assessed value as shown on the last assessment roll upon which such Building was assessed, this Bylaw applies
to the whole of the Building and to all Construction done in connection with the repairs thereto, and where the Building damage by any cause is fifty percent (50%) or less of the assessed
value as shown on the last assessment roll upon which such Building was assessed, the Bylaw is only applicable to the damaged part; 8.2.5 Storage and garden sheds and other accessory
Buildings not exceeding 10m2 in floor area may be erected without a Building Permit, but such Buildings shall comply with the applicable portions of the Building Code, this bylaw, all
other bylaws of the Corporation, and any other applicable enactment concerning safety;
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 8 of 45 8.2.6 Farm Buildings which are not used as dwellings shall comply with Part 1 of the Canadian Farm Building Code current edition issued by the
Associate Committee on the National Building Code which is hereby adopted and made a part of this Bylaw, and with all other applicable provisions of this Bylaw, all other Bylaws of
the Corporation and any other applicable enactment concerning safety. 8.3 Certified Geotechnical Report for Applications 8.3.1 If the Chief Building Official considers that Construction
would be on land that is subject to or is likely to be subject to flooding, mud flows, debris flows, debris torrents, erosion, land slip, rockfalls, subsidence or avalanche, the Building
Official may require the owner of land to provide the Chief Building Official with a report certified by a professional engineer with experience in geotechnical engineering that the
land may be used safely for the use intended. 8.3.2 Should the lands be of sufficient complexity the Chief Building Official may require a third party review of the aforementioned report.
The costs incurred for this report will be born solely by applicant. 8.3.3 If a professional engineer with experience in geotechnical engineering determines that land may not be used
safely for the use intended, the Chief Building Official must refuse to issue a building permit. 8.3.3.1 the Chief Building Official may issue a building permit in accordance with 8.3.3
if a professional engineer with experience in geotechnical engineering determines and certifies that the land may be used safely for the use intended if the land is used in accordance
with the conditions specified in the professional’s report 8.3.4 A building permit under 8.3.2 may only be issued on the following conditions: 8.3.4.1 the owner of the land covenants
with the municipality to use the land only in the manner determined and certified by the engineer as enabling the safe use of the land for the use intended, 8.3.4.2 the covenant contains
conditions respecting reimbursement by the covenanter for any expenses that may be incurred by the covenantee as a result of a breach of a covenant under paragraph (a), and 8.3.4.3
the covenant be registered under section 219 of the Land Title Act. 8.4 Private Wells and Septic Systems 8.4.1 Except as hereinafter specifically provided, no Building Permit shall
be issued for the Construction of any Building where the property on which the proposed Building is to be located has not been occupied during the previous 12 month period and is not
served by a community water system until, a certificate of well water quantity and potability in the form provided by the Chief Building Official, certifying that the well or wells
on the Premises will be
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 9 of 45 capable of supplying at least 2,250 litres of potable water per day per dwelling unit on a year round basis, has been submitted to the Chief
Building Official. 8.4.2 Where a certificate of well water quantity has been executed by a Professional Engineer certifying that the well or wells on the Premises will be capable of
supplying at least 2,250 litres of water per day per dwelling unit on a year round basis, the Chief Building Official may issue a Building Permit prior to receiving a certificate of
well water potability provided that the applicant enters into an agreement with the Corporation to install any water treatment system necessary to render the well water potable to the
satisfaction of the Authorizing Officer as designated by the Health Authority prior to the occupancy of the Building and, as security for the carrying out of the said agreement, deposits
with the Corporation, in the form of cash, term deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a financial institute acceptable to the Corporation, a sum equal to the estimated
cost of installing the water treatment system but in no case shall be less than Five Thousand Dollars per well ($5,000). 8.4.3 This Section does not apply where a proposed new Building
is to replace an existing Building on the same Premises and where there is an existing proven source of potable ground water yielding 2,250 litres per day on a year round basis. 8.4.4
Except as hereinafter specifically provided, no Building Permit shall be issued for the Construction of any Building where the Premises on which the proposed Building is to be located
is not served by a public sanitary sewer system until a filing has been received by the Health Authority for the installation of a septic sewage disposal system. Confirmation is required
to be submitted to the Chief Building Official by an “Authorized Person”, as defined in the Sewerage System Regulation of BC -relating to small building additions and accessory buildings
-has provided written assurances that the Construction is not impacting on the existing septic sewage disposal system. 8.4.5 Where an alternate method of sewage disposal is required
due to soil conditions and where a filing has been registered at the Health Authority to allow Construction to proceed prior to the installation of the alternate sewage disposal system,
the Chief Building Official may issue a Building Permit prior to the installation of the alternate sewage disposal system provided that the applicant enters into an agreement with the
Corporation assuring that the alternate sewage system shall be installed in accordance with the filing made at the Health Authority, prior to the occupancy of the Building and, as security
for the carrying out of the said agreement, deposits with the Corporation, in the form of cash, term deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a financial institute acceptable
to the Corporation, a sum equal to the estimated cost of installing the alternate sewage disposal system but in no case shall be less than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) minimum.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 10 of 45 9. Applications for Complex Buildings 9.1 An application for a building permit with respect to a Complex Building shall; 9.1.1 be made in the
form provided by the Chief Building Official, signed by the owner, or a signing officer if the owner is a corporation, and the coordinating registered professional; 9.1.2 be accompanied
by the owner’s acknowledgment of responsibility and undertakings made in the form provided by the Chief Building Official, signed by the owner, or a signing officer if the owner is
a corporation; 9.1.3 include a site plan showing: 9.1.3.1 the bearing and dimensions of the parcel taken from the registered subdivision plan; 9.1.3.2 the legal description and civic
address of the parcel; 9.1.3.3 the location and dimensions of all statutory rights of way, easements and setback requirements; 9.1.3.4 the location and dimensions of all existing and
proposed Buildings or Structures on the parcel; 9.1.3.5 setbacks to the natural boundary of any lake, swamp, pond or watercourse where the Corporation‘s land use regulations establish
siting requirements related to flooding; 9.1.3.6 the existing and finished ground levels to an established datum at or adjacent to the site and the geodetic elevation of the underside
of the floor system of a Building or Structure where the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge’s land use regulations establish siting requirements related to minimum floor elevation;
and 9.1.3.7 the location, dimension and gradient of parking and driveway access; 9.1.4 include floor plans showing the dimensions, heights and uses of all areas: the dimensions and
height of crawl and roof spaces; the location, size and swing of doors; the location, size and opening of windows; floor, wall, and ceiling finishes; Plumbing fixtures; structural elements;
and stair dimensions. 9.1.5 include a cross section through the Building or Structure illustrating foundations, drainage, ceiling heights and Construction systems; 9.1.6 include elevations
of all sides of the Building or Structure showing finish details, roof slopes, windows, doors, proposed and finished grades at and beyond the building face to provide an accurate representation
of finished grade levels and their impact on building elements and access points;
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 11 of 45 9.1.7 include cross-sectional details drawn at an appropriate scale and at sufficient locations to illustrate that the Building or Structure
substantially conforms to the Building Code; 9.1.8 include copies of approvals required under any enactment relating to health or safety, including, without limitation, sewage disposal
permits, highway access permits and Health Authority approval; 9.1.9 include a letter of assurance in the form as provided in Division C -Part 2 of the Building Code, signed by the
owner, or a signing officer of the owner if the owner is a corporation, and the coordinating registered professional. 9.1.10 include letters of assurance in the form provided in Division
C -Part 2 of the current edition of the Building Code, each signed by such registered professionals of record as the Building Official or Building Code may require to prepare the design
for and conduct field reviews of the Construction of the Building or Structure; 9.1.11 include two copies of specifications and three sets of drawings at a scale of ¼”:1’-0”, 1:50,
or another suitable scale of the design prepared by each registered professional of record and including the information set out in sections 9.1.4 – 9.1.7 of this bylaw; 9.1.12 may
require structural drawings sealed by a Qualified Professional as provided for under Section 55 (1)(d) of the CC for all new construction or additions to existing buildings; 9.2 In
addition to the requirements of section 9.1, the following may be required by a Building Official to be submitted with a building permit application for the Construction of a Complex
Building where the complexity of the proposed Building or Structure or siting circumstances warrant: 9.2.1 site servicing drawings, including sufficient detail of off-site services
to indicate locations at the property line, prepared and sealed by a registered professional, in accordance with the Corporation’s subdivision servicing bylaw; 9.2.2 a section through
the site showing grades, Buildings, Structures, parking areas and driveways; 9.2.3 any other information required by the Building Official or the Building Code to establish substantial
compliance with this bylaw, the Building Code and other bylaws and enactments relating to the Building or Structure. 10. Applications for Simple Buildings 10.1 An application for a
building permit with respect to a Simple Building shall; 10.1.1 be in the form provided by the Chief Building Official, signed by the owner, or a signing officer if the owner is a corporation;
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 12 of 45 10.1.2 be accompanied by the owner’s acknowledgment of responsibility and undertakings made in the form provided by the Chief Building Official,
signed by the owner, or a signing officer if the owner is a corporation; 10.1.3 include a site plan showing: 10.1.3.1 the bearing and dimensions of the parcel taken from the registered
subdivision plan; 10.1.3.2 the legal description and civic address of the parcel; 10.1.3.3 the location and dimensions of all statutory rights of way, easements and setback requirements;
10.1.3.4 the location and dimensions of all existing and proposed Buildings or Structures on the parcel; 10.1.3.5 setbacks to the natural boundary of any lake, swamp, pond or watercourse
where the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge’s land use regulations establish siting requirements related to flooding; 10.1.3.6 the existing and finished ground levels to an
established datum at or adjacent to the site and the geodetic elevation of the underside of the floor system of a Building or Structure where the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge’s land use regulations establish siting requirements related to minimum floor elevation; and 10.1.3.7 the location, dimension and gradient of parking and driveway access; 10.1.3.8
the comprehensive lot grading required to establish Building or Structure height compliance with the District of Maple Ridge’s Zoning Bylaw; 10.1.4 include floor plans showing the dimensions,
heights and uses of all areas: the dimensions and height of crawl and roof spaces; the location, size and swing of doors; the location, size and opening of windows; floor, wall, and
ceiling finishes; Plumbing fixtures; structural elements; and stair dimensions. 10.1.5 include a cross section through the Building or Structure illustrating foundations, drainage,
ceiling heights and Construction systems; 10.1.6 include elevations of all sides of the Building or Structure showing finish details, roof slopes, windows, doors, proposed and finished
grades at and beyond the building face to provide an accurate representation of finished grade levels and their impact on building elements and access points; 10.1.7 include cross-sectional
details drawn at an appropriate scale and at sufficient locations to illustrate that the Building or Structure substantially conforms to the Building Code;
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 13 of 45 10.1.8 include copies of approvals required under any enactment relating to health or safety, including, without limitation, sewage disposal
permits, highway access permits and Health Authority approval; 10.1.9 include a foundation design prepared by a registered professional in accordance with Part 4 of the Building Code,
accompanied by letters of assurance in the form provided in Division C -Part 2 of the current edition of the Building Code, signed by the registered professional of record, unless;
10.1.9.1 the requirements of section 10.1.9 are waived by a Building Official because the Building Official required a professional engineer’s report pursuant to section 56 of the CC
and the building permit is issued in accordance with section 56 of the CC, (see section 8.3) or; 10.1.9.2 documentation, prepared and sealed by a registered professional, is provided
certifying that the foundation design substantially complies with section 9.4.4 of Part 9 the Building Code and the foundation excavation substantially complies with section 9.12 of
Part 9 of the Building Code. 10.1.10 include two copies of specifications and two sets of drawings at a scale of ¼”: 1’-0”, 1:50, or another suitable scale of the design including the
information set out in sections 10.1.4 to 10.1.9 of this bylaw. 10.2 In addition to the requirements of section 10.1, every new dwelling of residential occupancy must be constructed
with the ability to install a solar domestic hot water heating system. The current “Solar Hot Water Ready Regulation” as amended, is hereby adopted and form part of this Bylaw. Construction
pursuant to this regulation shall follow the form as prescribed in Appendix B of this bylaw. 10.3 In addition to the requirements of section 10.1, the following may be required by a
Building Official to be submitted with a building permit application for the Construction of a Simple Building where the project involves two or more buildings, which in the aggregate
total more than 1000 square metres of building area, or two or more buildings that will contain four or more dwelling units, or otherwise where the complexity of the proposed Building
or Structure or siting circumstances warrant: 10.3.1 site servicing drawings, including sufficient detail of off-site services to indicate locations at the property line, prepared and
sealed by a registered professional, in accordance with the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge’s subdivision servicing bylaw; 10.3.2 a section through the site showing grades,
Buildings, Structures, parking areas and driveways; 10.3.3 a roof plan and roof height calculations; 10.3.4 structural, electrical, mechanical or fire suppression drawings prepared
and sealed by a registered professional;
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 14 of 45 10.3.5 letters of assurance in the form provided in Division C -Part 2 of the current edition of the Building Code, signed by the registered
professional of record; 10.3.6 any other information required by the Building Official, Building Code, B.C. Safety Standards Act including the B.C. Gas Safety Regulation and Code or
the Electrical Safety Regulation and Code to establish substantial compliance with this bylaw, the Building Code and other bylaws and enactments relating to the Building or Structure.
10.4 In addition to the requirements of section 10.1, the following shall be required by a Building Official to be submitted with a building permit application for the Construction
of a Simple Building where the project involves an infill lot in an already established subdivision: 10.4.1 include a current posting and topographic survey of the land prepared by
a land surveyor registered in the Province of B.C., 10.4.2 include invert elevations of the municipal connections at the property line and establish the minimum building elevation to
ensure gravity feed of the storm and sanitary sewers to the municipal connections. Should storm outfall be to a ditch then invert elevation is to be 250mm from crest of ditch or as
determined by the Municipal Engineer. 11. Professional Plan Certification 11.1 The letters of assurance in the form provided in Division C -Part 2 of the current edition of the Building
Code. and provided pursuant to sections 9.1.10, 10.1.9, 10.3.5, and 19.1 of this bylaw are relied upon by the Corporation and its Building Officials as certification that the design
and plans to which the letters of assurance relate comply with the Building Code and other applicable enactments relating to safety. 11.2 A building permit issued for the Construction
of a Complex Building, or for a Simple Building for which a Building Official required professional design pursuant to section 10.3.4 and letters of assurance pursuant to section 10.3.5
of this bylaw, shall be in the form provided by the Chief Building Official. 11.3 A building Permit issued pursuant to section 11.1 of this bylaw shall include a notice to the owner
that the building Permit is issued in reliance upon the certification of the registered professionals of record that the design and plans submitted in support of the application for
the building Permit comply with the Building Code and other applicable enactments relating to safety. 11.4 When a building permit is issued in accordance with section 11.1 of this bylaw
the permit fee shall be reduced by 5% of the fees payable pursuant to Appendix “A” to this bylaw, up to a maximum reduction of $500.00 (five hundred dollars).
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 15 of 45 12. Fees and Charges 12.1 In addition to applicable fees and charges required under other bylaws, a permit fee, calculated in accordance with
Appendix “A”, “D”, “E” and “F” to this bylaw, shall be paid in full upon issuance of any permit under this bylaw. 12.2 The appropriate plan-processing fee as set out in Appendix “A”,
“D”, “E” and “F” shall accompany an application made for a permit to this bylaw. 12.3 Where, due to non-compliance with this bylaw, more than two inspections are necessary when one
inspection is normally required, for each inspection after the second inspection, a re-inspection fee as set out in Appendix “A”, “D”, “E” and “F” to this bylaw shall be paid prior
to additional inspections being performed. 12.4 Where a required permit inspection is requested to be done after the hours during which the offices of the Corporation are normally open,
an inspection charge shall be payable based on the time actually spent in making such inspection, including travel time, as set out in Appendix “A”, “D”, “E” and “F” to this bylaw.
12.5 The fees as set out in Appendix "A", "D", "E" and "F" to this bylaw shall be adjusted annually and implemented on the 15th day of January in the following year. This annual adjustment
shall be based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) -as established by Statistics Canada -based on the previous 12 month period ending December. 13. Building Permits 13.1 When: 13.1.1
a completed application in compliance with section 9 or 10 of this bylaw, including all required supporting documentation has been submitted; 13.1.2 the owner or his or her representative
has paid all applicable fees set out in 12.1 of this bylaw; 13.1.3 the owner or his or her representative has paid all charges and met all requirements imposed by any other statute
or bylaw; 13.1.4 no covenant, agreement, or regulation of the Corporation authorizes the permit to be withheld; a Building Official shall issue the permit for which the application
is made. 13.2 When the application is in respect of a Building that includes, or will include, a residential occupancy, the building permit must not be issued unless the owner provides
evidence pursuant to section 30 (1) of the Home Owner Protection Act, SBC 1998 Chapter 31, and amendments thereto, that the proposed Building: 13.2.1 is covered by home warranty insurance,
and 13.2.2 the Constructor is a licensed residential builder.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 16 of 45 13.3 Section 13.2 of this bylaw does not apply if the Owner is not required to be licensed and to obtain home warranty insurance in accordance
with sections 20 (1) or 30 (1) of the Home Owner Protection Act, SBC 1998 Chapter 31, and amendments thereto. 14. Change of Plans: 14.1 The plans and specifications for any Building,
Structure, Plumbing, Electrical Equipment or gas Construction for which a Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit has been issued shall not be altered
unless such alteration is approved in writing by the Chief Building Official. 14.2 No person shall do any Construction that is at variance with the description, plans and specifications
submitted with the application for a Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit which has been issued pursuant to this Bylaw, unless such change has been
approved in writing by the Chief Building Official. 15. Revocation of Permit: 15.1 Where an applicant fails to obtain or provide the necessary documentation to complete a Building Permit,
Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit within 60 calendar days of being notified that the same is ready for issuance or in need of additional information, unless an extension
has been granted by the Chief Building Official, the application shall be deemed null and void and any fees paid in respect of such application shall be forfeited and any documentation
submitted may be destroyed. 15.2 Every Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit is issued subject to the following conditions: 15.2.1 the Construction shall
commence within 6 months from the date the Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit is issued; 15.2.2 the Construction shall not be discontinued or suspended
for a period in excess of 12 months; 15.2.3 the Construction shall be completed within 24 months from the date the Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit
is issued; and 15.2.4 In the event that any conditions in clauses 15.2.1, 15.2.2 or 15.2.3 of this subsection are breached, the Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and
or Gas Permit authorizing the Construction shall forthwith expire and shall be without force and effect. 15.3 The Chief Building Official may revoke a Building Permit, Plumbing Permit,
Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit if; 15.3.1 there is a contravention of any condition under which that Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit was issued;
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 17 of 45 15.3.2 the Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit was issued on the basis of incorrect information provided
by the owner, his agent, his contractor or a Registered Professional; or 15.3.3 there is a violation of this Bylaw or other relevant Bylaws and any other applicable enactment concerning
safety. 16. Permit Fee Refund 16.1 Where an Owner or his agent applies in writing for the cancellation of a Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit issued
under this Bylaw, 75% of any Permit fee paid in excess of $150.00 may be refunded to the holder of the Permit, provided; 16.1.1 the Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit
and or Gas Permit had not expired at the time the application for cancellation was received; and 16.1.2 no Construction had commenced under that Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical
Permit and or Gas Permit. 17. Permit Transfer and Limitations 17.1 No Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit issued pursuant to this Bylaw shall be transferred
or assigned until the holder of the Building Permit, Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit has received in writing: 17.1.1 approval from the Chief Building Official for
the transfer or assignment; and 17.1.2 has paid the prescribed transfer fee as set out in Schedules “A, D, E, & F” hereto. 17.2 A Building Official may extend the period of time set
out under sections 15.2.1 and 15.2.2 where Construction has not been commenced or has been discontinued due to adverse weather, strikes, material or labour shortages, or similar hardship
beyond the owner’s control. 17.3 A Building Official may issue a foundation permit in the form provided by the Chief Building Official, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 17.4
A Building Official may issue a building permit for a portion of a Building or Structure before the design, plans and specifications for the entire Building or Structure have been accepted,
provided sufficient information has been provided to the Corporation to demonstrate to the Building Official that the portion authorized to be constructed substantially complies with
this and other applicable bylaws and the permit fee applicable to that portion of the Building or Structure has been paid. The issuance of the permit notwithstanding, the requirements
of this bylaw apply to the remainder of the Building or Structure as if the permit for the portion of the Building or Structure had not been issued.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 18 of 45 17.5 When a site has been excavated under a foundation permit issued pursuant to section 17.3 of this bylaw and a building permit is not subsequently
issued or a subsisting building permit has expired in accordance with the requirements of section 15.2, but without the Construction of the Building or Structure for which the building
permit was issued having commenced, the owner shall fill in the excavation to restore the original gradients of the site within 60 days of being served notice by the Corporation to
do so. 18. Disclaimer of Warranty or Representation 18.1 Neither the issuance of a permit under this bylaw, the review and acceptance of the design, drawings, plans or specifications,
nor inspections made by a Building Official, shall constitute a representation or warranty that the Building Code or the bylaw have been complied with or the Building or Structure meets
any standard of materials or workmanship, and no person shall rely on any of those acts as establishing compliance with the Building Code or this bylaw or any standard of Construction.
19. Professional Design and Field Review 19.2 When a Building Official considers that the site conditions, size or complexity of a development or an aspect of a development warrant,
he or she may require a registered professional to provide design and plan certification and field review supported by letters of assurance in the form provided in Division C -Part
2 of the current edition of the Building Code. 19.3 Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for a Complex Building, or Simple Building in circumstances where letters of assurance
have been required in accordance with sections 10.1.9, 10.3.5, or 19.1 of this bylaw, the owner shall provide the Corporation with letters of assurance in the form provided in Division
C -Part 2 of the current edition of the Building Code. 19.4 When a registered professional provides letters of assurance in accordance with sections 9.1.10, 10.1.9, 10.3.5, or 19.2
of this bylaw, he or she shall also provide proof of professional liability insurance to the Building Official in the form provided by the Chief Building Official, except that proof
of professional liability insurance in respect of building envelope matters need not be provided if the owner grant to the Corporation a covenant registerable under Section 219 of the
Land Title Act requiring that the building envelope, in respect of which the registered professional of record has provided design or field review services, be monitored, maintained
and repaired in accordance with the recommendations of the registered professional of record as set out in the covenant, and containing a full release and indemnity of this Corporation
in respect of claims of any nature arising from any defect in design, installation or performance of the building envelope. 20. Responsibilities of the Owner 20.1 Every owner shall
ensure that all Construction complies with the Building Code, B.C. Safety Standards Act referencing the Gas Safety Regulation and Code and the Electrical Safety Regulation and Code,
this bylaw, other Municipal Bylaws and other applicable enactments respecting safety.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 19 of 45 20.2 Every owner to whom a permit is issued shall be responsible for the cost of repair of any damage to municipal works and property that
occurs in the course of the work authorized by the permit. (see Section 22) 20.3 Every owner to whom a permit is issued shall, during Construction: 20.3.1 keep a copy of the accepted
designs, plans and specifications on the property and keep inspection records in a conspicuous place 20.3.2 post the civic address on the property in a location visible from any adjoining
streets. 21. Surveyor's Certificate 21.1 Where the market value of a proposed Building will exceed $1,000.00 and such Building is being constructed or will be constructed upon a concrete
foundation or pad, the Chief Building Official may require that the applicant submit a Surveyor's Certificate showing the geodetic elevations of the forms and the location of the forms
in relation to the boundaries of the parcel upon which the Building is being or will be constructed. An original copy of this certificate is required to be presented to the Building
Official on site at the time of the inspection. 21.2 No Building or Structure shall be constructed on any parcel in such a manner that it encroaches upon any adjoining parcels or crosses
any parcel boundary. 22. Inspections 22.2 When a registered professional provides letters of assurance in accordance with sections 9.1.9, 10.1.9, 10.3.5, or 19.2 of this bylaw, the
Corporation will rely solely on field reviews undertaken by the registered professional of record and the letters of assurance submitted pursuant to section 19.2 of this bylaw as certification
that the Construction substantially conforms to the design, plans and specifications and that the Construction complies with the Building Code, this bylaw and other applicable enactments
respecting safety. 22.3 Notwithstanding section 22.1 of this bylaw, a Building Official may attend the site from time to time during the course of Construction to ascertain that the
field reviews are taking place and to monitor the field reviews undertaken by the registered professionals of record. 22.4 A Building Official may attend periodically at the site of
the Construction of simple Buildings or Structures to ascertain whether the health and safety aspects of the work are being carried out in substantial conformance with the applicable
portions of the Building Code, this bylaw and any other applicable enactment concerning safety. Building 22.5 The owner, or there representative, shall give at least 24 hours notice
to the Corporation when requesting an inspection and shall obtain an inspection and receive a Building Official’s acceptance of the following aspects of the work prior to concealing
them:
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 20 of 45 22.5.1 the foundation and footing forms, before concrete is poured; 22.5.2 installation of perimeter drain tiles and damp-proofing, prior to
backfilling; 22.5.3 the preparation of ground, including ground cover, when required, prior to the placing of a concrete slab; 22.5.4 rough-in of factory built chimneys and fireplaces
and solid fuel burning appliances; 22.5.5 the framing and sheathing; 22.5.6 installation of rain screen; 22.5.7 installation of backing board prior to the installation of cultured stone
or stucco; 22.5.8 installation of insulation and vapour barrier; 22.5.9 the health and safety aspects of the work when the Building or Structure is substantially complete and ready
for but prior to occupancy. 22.6 No aspect of the work referred in section 22.4.1 -8 of this bylaw shall be concealed until a Building Official has accepted it in writing. 22.7 The
requirements of section 22.4.2 -9 of this bylaw do not apply to any aspect of the work that is the subject of a registered professional of records letter of assurance provided in accordance
with sections 9.1.10, 10.1.9, 10.3.5, paragraph 19.1 and 19.2 of this bylaw. Electrical 22.8 The holder of an electrical permit shall give at least 24 hours notice (contractors via
declaration only) to the Corporation when requesting an inspection and shall obtain an inspection and receive an Electrical Safety Officer’s acceptance of the following aspects of the
electrical work prior to concealing them. 22.8.1 after all underground electrical Construction is complete, but prior to the placing of any concrete or backfill; 22.8.2 after electrical
rough-in wiring but prior to framing; 22.8.3 electrical final inspection must be performed prior to the final Building inspection, Plumbing 22.9 The holder of a plumbing permit shall
give at least 24 hours notice to the Corporation when requesting an inspection and shall obtain an inspection and receive a building
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 21 of 45 official’s acceptance of the following aspects of the plumbing work prior to concealing them. 22.9.1 after the installation of foundation drains,
dampproofing and drain rock, sanitary sewer lines, storm sewer lines, water lines, sumps and storm water infiltration systems is complete, but prior to the backfilling of foundations;
22.9.2 after all underground Plumbing Construction is complete, but prior to the placing of any concrete or backfill; 22.9.3 after the installation of in slab radiant heat piping where
required, but prior to the pouring of concrete slabs; 22.9.4 after Plumbing rough-in, but prior to framing; 22.9.5 Plumbing final inspection must be performed prior to the final Building
inspection, Gas 22.10 The holder of a gas permit shall give at least 24 hours notice to the Corporation when requesting an inspection and shall obtain an inspection and receive a Gas
Safety Officer’s acceptance of the following aspects of the gas work prior to concealing them. 22.10.1 after all underground gas Construction is complete, but prior to the placing of
any concrete or backfill; 22.10.2 after heating duct installations, gas venting installations, gas piping installations, but prior to framing; 22.10.3 gas final inspection must be performed
prior to the final Building inspection, 23. Occupancy Permits 23.1 No person shall occupy a Building or Structure or part of a Building or Structure until an occupancy permit has been
issued, in the form set out in schedule “C” to this bylaw, by the Chief Building Official 23.2 An occupancy permit shall not been issued unless: 23.2.1 all letters of assurance have
been submitted when required in accordance with sections 9.1.10, 10.1.9, and 10.3.5, of this bylaw, or 23.2.2 all aspects of the work requiring inspection and an acceptance pursuant
to section 22.4 of this bylaw have been inspected and accepted and; 23.2.3 All the requirements of this Bylaw, other relevant Bylaws of the District and any other applicable enactment
concerning safety as evidenced by inspection approvals pursuant to sections 22.7, 22.8 and 22.9.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 22 of 45 23.3 The type of occupancy or use of a Building for which an Occupancy Permit has been issued shall not be changed to any other type of occupancy
or use which is not specifically approved in the occupancy Permit until a new occupancy Permit therefore has been issued by the Chief Building Official. 23.4 The site must be identified
in accordance with the Corporation’s House Numbering Bylaw for emergency vehicle and inspection purposes during Construction. Permanent address must be in place prior to occupancy.
23.5 Before an occupancy Permit is granted, all Provisional Occupancy Permit fees and any other Municipal fees shall be paid. Provisional Occupancy Permit 23.6 The Chief Building Official
may issue an occupancy permit for part of a Building or Structure when that part of the Building or Structure is self-contained, provided with essential services and meets requirements
set out in section 23.2 of this bylaw. Upon the written request of the holder of a Building Permit or the owner of a Building for which a Building Permit has been issued, and on payment
of fees required as per schedules A, D, E and F the Chief Building Official may issue a provisional occupancy Permit where such provisional occupancy will not jeopardize the health
or safety of the occupants of the Building. Planning and Engineering department approvals are necessary prior to the granting of the provisional occupancy Permit.. No Provisional Occupancy
Permit may be issued unless: 23.6.1 The exterior finishes of the Building are substantially complete; 23.6.2 A permanent address pursuant to Maple Ridge House Numbering Bylaw has been
assigned and posted on the Building; 23.6.3 It sets out the date of expiry of the Provisional Occupancy Permit; and 23.6.4 Where Registered Professionals are engaged in the inspection
process a certified statement from them that the provisional occupancy applied for will not jeopardize the health or safety of occupants of the Building. 23.7 The Chief Building Official
may require as a condition of issuance of a Provisional Occupancy Permit that the owner provide security equal to the value of part or all of outstanding Construction required to complete
the Building. 23.8 The site identified as per the Corporation’s House Numbering Bylaw for emergency vehicles and inspection purposes during Construction. Permanent address must be in
place prior to provisional occupancy. Where other items, not of health or safety concerns, relating to Building or site issues not covered by security already deposited with the Corporation,
the Director may require an amount of security equal to the value of outstanding Construction.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 23 of 45 24. Site Grades: 24.1 Where the natural grade of any land is altered for any reason, all slopes shall be suitably landscaped or retained to
prevent soil erosion and escape of water to or from adjacent Premises. Existing slopes, which are adequately retained by trees, shrubs, turf, rock or any combination thereof, shall
not require further treatment. 24.2 All walls, grade transitions and methods of soil retention shall be shown on the site plan including all details of Construction. Any wall (method
of soil retention) over 1 metre high shall be structurally engineered except that in geotechnically sensitive areas, the Chief Building Official may require a Geotechnical Engineer
to design and inspect the method of retention. A registered professional shall supervise the design and Construction of a retaining Structure greater than 1.0 metre in height. Sealed
copies of the design plan and field review reports prepared by the registered professional of record for all retaining Structures greater than 1.0 metre in height shall be submitted
to a Building Official prior to acceptance of the works. 24.3 Any retaining wall (method of soil retention) or grade alteration over 0.50 metres will require a Permit for grade alteration
or retaining wall(s) except that where the retaining wall(s) have been identified on the initial Building Permit application, no separate retaining wall Permit will be required. 25.
Design Data 25.1 The following climatic design data shall be utilized for the design of Buildings in the Municipality: 25.1.1 January 2 1/2 percent Design Temperature: -9oC 25.1.2 January
l percent Design Temperature: -11oC 25.1.3 July 2 1/2 percent Design Drybulb Temperature: 30oC 25.1.4 July 2 1/2 percent Design Wetbulb Temperature: 20oC 25.1.5 Annual Total Degree-days
below 18oC: 3050 25.1.6 Maximum Fifteen-minute rainfall: 10mm 25.1.7 Maximum One-day rainfall: 134mm 1/50 25.1.8 25.1.8 Annual Rain: 1800mm 25.1.9 Annual Total Precipitation: 1950mm
25.1.10 Moisture Index: 1.86 25.1.11 Driving Rain Wind Pressure Pa, 1/5: 160 25.1.12 Ground snow load (kPa): 25.1.13 0-45 metres elevation: 1/50 SS = 2.4 kPa (design weight based on
snow depth) SR = 0.2 kPa (design weight added for rain) SS + SR = 2.6 kPa calculated ground snow load Cb = 0.45 for entire roofs not exceeding 4.3 m /0.55 m for all other roofs Above
45 Metres: 0.008 x (Site elev. in Metres) + 2.04 kPa = SS 0.001 x (Site elev. in Metres) + 0.2 kPa = SR
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 24 of 45 CbSS + SR = specified snow load 25.1.13 Hourly Wind Pressures: Probability 1/10 = 0.36kN/m2 Probability 1/50 = 0.47kN/m2 25.1.14 Seismic Data:
Sa (0.2) = 0.97 Sa (0.5) = 0.65 Sa (1.0) = 0.32 Sa (2.0) = 0.17 PGA = 0.48 26. Temporary Buildings 26.1 Application for a Building Permit for a Temporary Building shall be in writing,
signed by the applicant and shall be accompanied by: 26.1.1 plans showing the location of the proposed Temporary Building or Structure and Construction details thereof; 26.1.2 an explanation
of the intended use for the proposed Temporary Building or Structure; 26.1.3 an agreement with the Corporation executed by the applicant, that the applicant will remove the Temporary
Building or Structure from the Premises and leave the site in a safe, tidy and sanitary condition upon the expiration of the Temporary Building Permit; and 26.1.4 cash, term deposit
or an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a financial institute acceptable to the Corporation in the amount $10,000.00 minimum up to a maximum of $20,000.00, based on a value of
25% of the Building as security for the carrying out of the agreement to remove the Temporary Building or Structure. 26.2 If, upon the expiration of the Temporary Building Permit, the
Permit holder does not remove the Temporary Building or Structure from the Premises and leave the site in a satisfactory condition, the Corporation may do so at the Permit holder's
expense and may deduct the cost of so doing from the security deposit. If the security deposit is not adequate to cover the said cost the Permit holder shall pay to the Corporation
any cost in excess of the security deposit. 26.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Temporary Building or Structure which is rendered Non Inhabitable and which conforms with all Bylaws
of the Corporation and the Provincial regulations may be allowed to remain on the Premises after the expiration of the Temporary Building Permit upon the Permit holder applying for
and receiving an occupancy Permit for the said Building or Structure. 26.4 In addition to the requirements of Sections 26.6 to 26.13 of this Bylaw all Temporary mobile homes except
those to be occupied for Temporary Residential Use pursuant to the provisions of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985,as amended shall comply with Canadian Standards Association
Z240 MH Series “mobile homes”, as referenced in Division B -Part 1 of the current Building Code;
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 25 of 45 26.5 All Temporary mobile homes to be occupied for Temporary Residential Use pursuant to the provisions of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510
-1985,as amended, and all other Temporary Buildings or Structures shall comply with all provisions of the Provincial regulations and all Bylaws of the Corporation. Prior to occupancy
the owner shall obtain an inspection by the Chief Building Official or a Building Official to determine compliance with all applicable Codes and Bylaws and shall pay an inspection fee
of $l50.00 to the Corporation. All Temporary Mobile Homes Shall: 26.6 be directly serviced by a water supply capable of supplying at least 2,250 litres of potable water per day per
dwelling on a year round basis; 26.7 be serviced by a separate sewage disposal system as filed by an “Authorized Person”, per the Provincial Sewerage Regulation, with the Health Authority;
26.8 be serviced by an electrical subfeed from the main dwelling or, with the approval of the Chief Building Official, a separate electrical service, when it can be shown that it would
be an extreme hardship due to location; a security deposit must be posted as per section 26.1.4 to cover the removal; 26.9 have any fuel oil tank or propane gas tank placed in accordance
with the British Columbia Fire Code as amended and totally screened from view from any highway; 26.10 be equipped with stairs, landings and handrails; 26.11 have a skirting around the
mobile home between the underside of the frame and the ground at its exterior perimeter; 26.12 be set true, square and level on the lot; and 26.13 have any support pad or base or any
material which is in contact with the ground, consist of concrete Construction designed and constructed in accordance with the provisions of the Building Code. 26.14 Where an application
for a Building Permit is made for the Construction of a residential dwelling on Premises where an existing residential dwelling is situated, and only one residential dwelling is Permitted
by the Bylaws of the Corporation, the Chief Building Official may issue the Building Permit provided that the owner of the Permit grants to the Corporation in registerable form a restrictive
covenant pursuant to Section 219 of the Land Title Act providing that: 26.14.1 Use and occupancy of the existing residential dwelling shall be prohibited upon occupancy of the new residential
dwelling; 26.14.2 The existing residential dwelling shall be wholly removed from the Premises within 60 days of commencement of occupancy of the new residential dwelling; and 26.14.3
Security be deposited with the Corporation to secure all the obligations of
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 26 of 45 the Covenantor. 26.15 Where a Temporary Building Permit has been issued for the Construction of a Building for a Temporary Residential Use
pursuant to the provisions of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985,as amended and where the Temporary Building complies with the provisions of the Provincial regulations and all
Bylaws of the Corporation, the Chief Building Official may issue a Temporary Residential Use agreement Permit to allow occupancy of the Temporary Building for a Temporary Residential
Use provided that the owner of the Permit grants to the Corporation in registerable form a restrictive covenant pursuant to Section 219 of the Land Title Act. 26.16 Applications for
Temporary second dwelling or Temporary Residential Use agreement Permits shall be in writing, signed by the applicant and shall be accompanied by: 26.16.1 for Buildings to be occupied
during the Construction of a new dwelling, plans showing the location of the existing dwelling and the proposed location of the new dwelling on the Premises; Such drawings shall conform
to the requirements of Section 10; 26.16.2 a restrictive covenant pursuant to Section 219 of the Land Title Act executed by the owner in registerable form an agreement with the Corporation,
that the applicant will remove the Temporary second dwelling from the Premises and leave the site in a safe, tidy and sanitary condition upon the expiration of the Temporary second
dwelling Permit; Such a restrictive covenant shall be registered with the Land Titles Office; and 26.16.3 cash, term deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a financial
institute acceptable to the Corporation in the amount of $10,000.00, as security to secure all the obligations of the Covenantee under the restrictive covenant; 26.17 If, upon the expiration
of the Temporary second dwelling Permit, the Permit holder does not remove the Temporary second dwelling from the Premises and does not leave the site in a satisfactory condition, the
Corporation may do so at the Permit holder’s expense and may deduct the cost of so doing from the security deposit. If the security deposit is not adequate to cover the said cost the
Permit holder shall pay to the Corporation any cost in excess of the security deposit, prior to the issuance of an occupancy Permit for the new dwelling. 26.18 Notwithstanding the foregoing,
a Temporary second dwelling which is rendered Non Inhabitable and which conforms with all Bylaws of the Corporation and the Provincial regulations may be allowed to remain on the Premises
as an accessory Building after the expiration of the Temporary second dwelling Permit provided that the Permit holder applies for and is issued an occupancy Permit for use of the Building
as an accessory Building. 27. Moving of Buildings 27.1 No person shall move any Building from one parcel of land to another parcel of land without first obtaining a Building Permit
therefore.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 27 of 45 27.2 Every application for a Building Permit to move a Building shall show the existing site of the Building and the proposed site to which
it is to be moved. 27.3 No Building Permit to move a Building shall be issued until the time and the route of the moving have been approved by the Officer in Charge of the local Detachment
of the R.C.M.P., all utility companies having overhead wires along the proposed route, the Municipal Engineering Department and the Chief Building Official. 27.4 No Building Permit
required under Section 26 shall be issued unless the application for the Building Permit includes all Construction necessary to complete the Building or Structure in compliance with
all Bylaws of the Corporation and of the Building Code; 27.5 No Building Permit shall be issued without the proposed building being in substantial compliance with the form and character
of other buildings within 200m of the location to which the building is to be moved. 28. Pools 28.1 No person shall construct a Pool on any Premises without first obtaining a Building
Permit to do so. 28.2 Every application for Construction of a Pool shall be accompanied by a plan showing: 28.2.1 the location of the proposed Pool in relation to all existing Buildings
on the Premises and the parcel boundaries; 28.2.2 the type of Construction; 28.2.3 the water supply and proposed method of drainage; 28.2.4 septic approval from the Health Authority
if not serviced by Municipal Sanitary Sewer; and 28.2.5 the proposed method and location of fencing and gates. 28.3 Every Pool, whether filled with water or empty, shall be completely
enclosed with a fence or other Structure which is not less than 1.2 metres in height, which has no opening or gap with its largest dimension being more than 100 mm for vertical pickets
or 25.4 mm for chain link fencing. Further, this enclosing structure must comply with the Building Code requirements for climbability of guards to restrict access to the Pool. The fence
or other Structure shall be continuous except for points of access which shall, except for access from doors of the residence, be equipped with self-closing gates which are designed
so that they will return to a latched or locked position when not in use, and which are secured by a latch or lock located not less than 150 mm from the top of the gate and not less
than l metre above grade, on the Pool side of the fence or other Structure. Also, the area within
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 28 of 45 300 mm of the latch mechanism must be solid with the only gap – maximum 12.5 mm -occurring between the gate and the adjacent post to which
the gate latches. 28.4 Every fence or other Structure enclosing a Pool, whether filled with water or empty, shall be maintained by the owner or occupier of the Premises upon which the
pool is located, in good order and repair so that it is adequate to perform its intended function. All sagging gates, loose parts, worn latches or locks and all broken or binding members
shall be promptly and adequately replaced or repaired. 28.5 Every gate in a fence or other Structure which provides access to a Pool shall be kept in a latched or locked closed position
and shall only be open for the purpose of entry to or exit from the Pool area during such period. 28.6 Every Pool and hot tub shall be drained into a sanitary sewer system or, where
a sanitary sewer system of adequate capacity is not available, into a dedicated septic dry well or rock pit approved by the Health Authority. 29. Plumbing 29.1 No Plumbing System, as
defined in the current Building Code shall be installed, altered or repaired except in accordance with the provisions of this Bylaw and the Building Code and Regulations. 29.2 No Plumbing,
including drainage systems, septic tanks, sewers and sewer connections, or any part thereof, shall be located outside of the lot being served by such Plumbing, except where an easement
has been registered in the Land Title Office charging the lands burdened by the easement and benefiting the lands served by such Plumbing System. 29.3 No Plumbing storm drainage system
shall be installed without gravity drainage to a Municipal or other approved drainage system unless a written request is made, a restrictive covenant pursuant to Section 219 of the
Land Title Act executed by the owner in registerable form including engineering details and auxiliary electrical backup power specifications or other equivalent emergency systems. Such
details must be provided and approved by the Chief Building Official prior to the commencement of any Building or drainage Construction. Permit Required 29.4 Except as hereinafter specifically
provided, no Plumbing shall be installed, altered or repaired until a Permit to do so has first been obtained pursuant to this Bylaw. 29.5 No Building Permit shall be required for the
repair of leaks in water pipes or the replacing of Plumbing fixtures, provided that such fixtures and the installation thereof conform with all other requirements of this Bylaw and
the provincial regulations, or for the removal of blockages in sewer or drain pipes provided that clean-outs are utilized for such purpose and it is not necessary to cut any sewer or
drain pipe. 29.6 Where Construction has commenced prior to issuance of the Plumbing Permit, the Permit fee shall be doubled up to a maximum of $2,000.00 per Building.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 29 of 45 29.7 A Plumbing Permit shall only be issued to a plumber holding a valid British Columbia Journeyman Plumber qualification and a valid Maple
Ridge Business License or, where the installation, alteration or repair of Plumbing is to be carried out within a single family dwelling and entirely by the owner and occupier or intended
occupier of the Premises for which the Permit is sought. 29.8 where the Construction is done under a home owner Permit and that person is found to be incompetent or to have violated
a condition under which the Permit was issued, that Permit will be revoked by the Chief Building Official and a qualified plumber will be required to review the project and complete
it under a new Permit prior to occupancy being issued relevant to this Permit. 29.9 Every application for a Plumbing Permit shall: 29.9.1 be made in the form provided for such purposes;
29.9.2 be signed by the applicant; and 29.9.3 be accompanied by plans and specifications sufficient to describe the proposed Construction and establish compliance with the Building
Code, this Bylaw and all other Bylaws of the Corporation. 29.10 Where an application has been made for a Plumbing Permit pursuant to this Bylaw and: 29.10.1 the proposed Construction
as shown in the application conforms with the Building Code and Regulations, this Bylaw and all other Bylaws of the Corporation; 29.10.2 the applicant has shown proof that he is the
holder of a valid British Columbia tradesman’s qualification certification as a plumber or, where the applicant is the owner and occupier or intended occupier of a single family dwelling
for which the Permit is sought, he has delivered a signed declaration that he will be carrying out the Construction himself; and 29.10.3 the applicant has paid the prescribed fee as
set out in Schedule “D” hereto; the Chief Building Official shall issue the Plumbing Permit for which the application was made. 29.11 The holder of a Plumbing Permit shall obtain an
inspection by a Building Official to determine compliance with the provisions of this Bylaw and the current Building Code and Regulations: 29.11.1 after the rough Plumbing is complete,
but prior to the installation of any fixtures or the covering thereof by dirt, concrete, insulation, lath or other interior or exterior finish which would conceal such Construction;
and 29.11.2 when the Plumbing is complete and ready for use, but before the Plumbing is put into use by the owner or occupier of the Premises.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 30 of 45 29.12 Provided however, that where a registered professional registered to practice Mechanical Engineering in the Province of British Columbia
has been engaged by the owner for the inspection of the Plumbing and where the prior written approval of the Chief Building Official has been obtained, sealed certificates of compliance
with the approved plans and the provincial regulations, submitted by the registered professional of record, may be accepted in lieu of inspections made by the Chief Building Official
or a Building Official. 29.13 The holder of a Plumbing Permit shall, during the installation, alteration or repair of the Plumbing Constructions, keep a copy of the Permit documentation
approved drawings and specifications, which accompanied the Permit application on the Premises. These drawings and specifications shall be kept on site and available to the Building
Official so that they are able to complete the inspections. Failure to have the drawings on site will be deemed an offence under this bylaw and will require a re-inspection fee and
re-inspection to verify that the Construction complies with the Permit. 30. Gas 30.1 Parts 1 to 9 of the current CSA B149.1-00 Standard, as amended, Natural Gas and Propane Installation
Code are hereby adopted and forms part of this Bylaw. 30.2 Every person who obtains a Permit for the installation or alteration of gas Construction pursuant to the B.C. Safety Standards
Act and related Gas Safety Regulation shall pay to the Corporation the fees prescribed in Schedule “E” hereto prior to obtaining the Permit. 30.3 Every person who obtains a Permit pursuant
to this Section 30 shall maintain and keep a copy of the Permit and all documentation and plans pertaining thereto on the Premises on which the Construction authorized by the said Permit
is being done. Failure to have the Permit documentation on site will be deemed an offence under this Bylaw and will require a re-inspection fee and re-inspection to verify that the
Construction complies with the Permit. 31. Electrical 31.2 Parts 1 and 2 of the current Canadian Electrical Code, as amended, are hereby adopted and form part of this Bylaw. 31.1 Every
person who obtains a Permit for the installation or alteration of Electrical Equipment pursuant to the B.C. Safety Standards Act, Electrical Safety Regulation and Electrical Code, shall
pay to the Corporation the fees prescribed in Schedule “F” hereto prior to obtaining the Permit. 31.2 Every person who obtains a Permit pursuant to this Section 31 shall maintain and
keep a copy of the Permit and all documentation and plans pertaining thereto on the Premises on which the Construction authorized by the said Permit is being done. Failure to have the
Permit documentation on site will be deemed an offense under this Bylaw and will require a re-inspection fee and inspection to verify that the Construction complies with the Permit.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 31 of 45 32. Penalties and Enforcement 32.1 Every person who contravenes any provision of this bylaw commits an offence punishable on summary conviction
and shall be liable to a fine of not more than $10,000.00 (Ten Thousand Dollars) or to imprisonment for not more than six months and or impose a “Monetary Penalty” in accordance with
the enabling Monetary Penalty Regulation for Gas and Electrical works or workmanship, forming part of the B.C. Safety Standards Act. 32.2 The Chief Building Official may order the cessation
of any work that is proceeding in contravention of the Building Code, B.C. Gas Safety Code and Electrical Code or related Safety Regulations, this bylaw, any other bylaw of the Corporation
or any other applicable enactment concerning safety, by posting a Stop Work notice in the form provided by the Chief Building Official. 32.3 The owner of property on which a Stop Work
notice has been posted, and every other person, shall cease all Construction work immediately and shall not do any work until all applicable provisions of this bylaw have been substantially
complied with and the Stop Work notice has been rescinded in writing by a Building Official. 32.4 Where a person occupies a Building or Structure or part of a Building or Structure
in contravention of section 6.4 of this bylaw the Chief Building Official may post a Do Not Occupy notice in the form provided by the Chief Building Official on the affected part of
the Building or Structure. 32.5 The owner of property on which a Do Not Occupy notice has been posted, and every person, shall cease occupancy of the Building or Structure immediately
and shall refrain from further occupancy until all applicable provisions of the Building Code and this bylaw have been substantially complied with and the Do Not Occupy notice has been
rescinded in writing by the Chief Building Official. 33. Severability 33.1 If any part, section, sub-section, clause, or sub-clause of this bylaw is, for any reason, held to be invalid
by the decision of a Court of competent jurisdiction, such decision does not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this bylaw. 34. Forms and Schedules 34.1 Schedules A, B,
C, D, E & F attached to this Bylaw form a part of this bylaw. READ a FIRST TIME on this day of READ a second time on this day of READ a third time on this day of ADOPTED this day of
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 32 of 45 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 33 of 45 SCHEDULE “A” – Building Permit Fees Effective January 1, 1999 The following fees shall be paid by the applicant for a Permit to construct a
Building or a Pool: BASE FEES For market value of Building or Pool or Construction to be done thereon of up to $l000.00 -$35.00 For market value of Building or Pool or Construction
to be done thereon of $l001.00 -$2000.00 -$43.00 plus: $8.95 for each additional $l000.00 or part thereof up to $25,000.00, plus $8.65 for each additional $1000.00 or part thereof up
to $50,000.00, plus $8.10 for each additional $1000.00 or part thereof up to $75,000.00, plus $7.60 for each additional $1000.00 or part thereof over $100,000.00, plus $6.30 for each
additional $1000.00 or part thereof up to infinite. NOTE: Building Values shall be based upon current estimated Construction costs. The current edition of the Marshall Valuation Service,
the Marshall and Swift Residential Cost Handbook or other valuation tables may be used by the Chief Building Official to determine the market value for the purpose of assessing Permit
fees. OTHER FEES Where an application is made for a Building Permit for other than Single Family Detached Dwellings, there will be an additional fee of $79.00 per dwelling unit. In
addition to the above, the following fees shall be paid by the applicant for a Permit pursuant to this Bylaw: 1. Permit to erect a retaining wall -first 20m or portion thereof $53.00
for each additional 10m or portion thereof -$27.00 2. Permit to install a fireplace, stove or chimney -$30.25 for each fireplace, stove or flue. 3. Permit to install a Dry Chemical
Fire Extinguishing System -$30.25 4. Building Demolition Permit -$30.25 5. Temporary Building Permit $30.25
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 34 of 45 SCHEDULE “A” – Building Permit Fees Effective January 1, 1999 6. Temporary Second Dwelling Permit -$30.25 7. Provisional Occupancy Permit -(a)
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING (i) $79.00 (90 day maximum period) (ii) $27.00 renewal (90 day maximum period) (b) MULTI FAMILY DWELLING (i) $79.00 per unit (120 day maximum period) (ii) $27.00
renewal per unit (60 day maximum) (c) OTHER THAN RESIDENTIAL (i) $79.00 per unit (60 day maximum period) (ii) $27.00 renewal per unit (60 day maximum) 8. For Change of Occupancy or
use where a Building Permit is not required -$30.25 9. Permit Assignment or Transfer Fee -$30.25 10. Permit Renewal Fee -$30.25 11. Re-inspection Fee where more than 1 re-inspection
is required due to the fault of the holder of a Building Permit -$35.50 for each extra re-inspection required. 12. Address Change: (i) If Permit has been issued but no occupancy Permit
issued -$105.00 per unit; (ii) Permit application in process but Permit not issued -$42.00 per unit (iii) Occupancy Permit issued, follow fee schedule in accordance with Maple Ridge
House Numbering Bylaw 13. Additional fee for any inspection performed outside the boundaries of the Municipality $.40 per km traveled, measured from the Municipal Hall to the site of
the inspection along the shortest available highway route. 14. Miscellaneous and Special Inspections: (a) during normal working hours -$38.50 per hour; (b) outside normal working hours
-$55.50 per hour; (c) minimum charge -1 hour 15. A fee of $2.00 per page, for plans for micro film charge over and above Building Permit.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 35 of 45 SCHEDULE “A” – Building Permit Fees Effective January 1, 1999 16. Charges as shown below will be applicable for examination of plans and specifications
on application of Building Permit: (a) Plan Check Fee -$42.00 per hour (b) Single or Two Family -minimum $30.25 per unit (c) Other than Single or Two Family -minimum $105.00 per Building
17. For each written Building record search, for legal purposes a fee of $79.00 per parcel or file is applicable. 18. Business Licence Inspection Fee -minimum $30.25 per inspection,
maximum $121.00 per inspection. 19. Where Construction is started prior to obtaining a Permit, the applicable Permit fee shall be doubled but in no case shall the penalty amount doubled,
exceed $1,600.00 per Building. 20. If the applicant makes an erroneous declaration on the Permit application to obtain a lesser Permit fee, the Permit shall be revoked and a new Permit
issued using the corrected value. The new Permit shall be calculated according to the corrected Permit value and a 50% administrative fee shall be added to the calculated fee. 22. A
fee of $28.25 for environmental inspection shall be paid for each residential unit with a value in excess of $10,000.00. For each non residential unit a fee of $28.25 per unit shall
be paid where the value exceeds $20,000.00.
Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 Page 36 of 45 SCHEDULE “B” -Solar Hot Water Regulation Effective upon adoption of the Bylaw Contents 1. Definitions 2. Applications 3. Solar collectors for
a domestic hot water system 4. Solar hot water ready components 5. Conduits runs Definitions 1. In this regulation, the terms in italics have the same as in the 2006 British Columbia
Building Code. Application 2. This regulation is applicable in the following local government jurisdictions: (a) Cariboo Regional District; (b) City of Campbell River; (c) City of Chilliwack;
(d) City of Colwood; (e) City of Cranbrook; (f) City of Dawson Creek; (g) City of Duncan; (h) City of Fernie; (i) City of Fort St. John; (j) City of Kelowna; (k) City of New Westminster;
(l) City of North Vancouver; (m) City of Richmond; (n) City of Pitt Meadows; (o) City of Port Coquitlam; (p) City of Port Moody; (q) City of West Vancouver; (r) Corporation of Delta;
(s) Cowichan Valley Regional District; (t) District of Invermere; (u) District of Maple Ridge; (v) District of Metchosin; (w) District of North Vancouver; (x) District of Peachland;
(y) District of Sparwood; (z) District of Tofino; (aa) Greater Vancouver Regional District; (bb) Municipality of North Cowichan; (cc) Resort Municipality of Whistler; (dd) Squamish
Lillooet Regional District; (ee) Town of View Royal; (ff) Township of Esquimalt; (gg)Township of Langley; (hh) Village of Ashcroft; (ii) Village of Kaslo; (jj) Village of Midway.
Building Bylaw No. 6925 -2012 Page 37 of 45 SCHEDULE “B” -Solar Hot Water Regulation Effective upon adoption of the Bylaw Solar collectors for a domestic hot water system 3. (1) Subject
to subsection (2), 2 conduit runs and an area that (a) is not less than 9.3 square meters, (b) has no dimension less than 2.7 meters, and (c) is designated for future installation of
solar collectors for a solar domestic hot water system in compliance with CAN/CSA-F383-87 Must be incorporated in construction of new buildings of residential occupancy that contain
(a) One dwelling unit, or (b) One dwelling unit and one secondary suite. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply with respect to new construction referred to in that subsection if the local
government of the jurisdiction to which this regulation applies and within which the new construction is to occur is satisfied that building site conditions do not permit effective
use of solar hot water heating Structural requirements 4. Structural members of areas referred to in section 3 (1) must be designed to accommodate the greater of the following; (a)
the anticipated load; (b) A load of 0.2 kpa in addition to design loads required by the British Columbia Building Code. Conduit runs 5. (1) Two straight, continuous, conduit runs must
be provided that extend from the area directly adjacent to the building’s primary service water heater to (a) an accessible attic space adjacent to the roof area designated for installation
of solar collectors for a domestic hot water system, (b) the roof area designated for installation of solar collectors for a solar domestic hot water system, or (c) the exterior wall
surface directly adjacent to the area designated for the installation of solar collectors for a solar domestic hot water system. (2) Conduit runs described in subsection (1) must (a)
be accessible at both ends, (b) be capped or sealed at both ends to prevent water ingress and air leakage, (c) be identified by markings that are permanent, distinct and easily recognized,
(d)have a minimum inside diameter of 55 mm, and (e) be able to accommodate the installation of insulated plumbing services for a solar domestic hot water system in compliance with CAN/CSA-F383,
Installation Code for Solar Domestic Hot Water Systems, as referred to in the British Columbia Building Code.
Building Bylaw No. 6925 -2012 Page 38 of 45 SCHEDULE “C” OCCUPANCY PERMIT Address of Building: Legal Description: Approved Occupancy (use): Name of Business, if applicable: The Building
constructed under the authority of Building Permit Number: is approved for Occupancy. The septic system for this Building has been approved for bedrooms. This Permit pertains to sq
ft of the basement being finished. This Permit number does include or does not include a secondary suite. This Permit confirms that inspections pursuant to the District of Maple Ridge
Building Bylaw have been complete and no substantive violation of health or safety requirements have been observed. This Permit is not a warranty that the subject Building complies
with all Municipal and Provincial Regulations governing Building Construction nor that it is without defect. It is only a comment on the conditions of the Building at the date of issue
only. This certificate shall be affixed to a conspicuous and permanent place in the said Building and shall not be removed. NOTE: A new Permit shall be obtained prior to any change
in the use of the Building. Chief Building Official Per: Date:
Building Bylaw No. 6925 -2012 Page 39 of 45 SCHEDULE “D” – Plumbing Permit Fees Effective January 1, 1999 The following fees shall be paid by the applicant for a Permit to install, alter
or repair Plumbing: 1. Minimum fee for any Plumbing Permit or inspections -$30.25 2. For Plumbing Construction which involves the installation of fixtures: $16.90 for the first fixture
plus $15.25 for each additional fixture For the purpose of this Bylaw, “fixtures” shall include Pools, interceptors, hot water storage tanks, automatic washers, roof drains, floor drains
and built-in dishwashers. Where an application is made for a Plumbing Permit for other than single family detached dwellings, there will be an additional fee of $27.00 per dwelling
unit. Permit fees for finishing Plumbing only (installation of fixtures where rough-in Plumbing exists) shall be 50% of the above fees. 3. For Plumbing Construction which involves the
connection of hydraulic equipment or the installation of vacuum breakers, backflow prevention devices or similar equipment -$22.40 per item connected or installed. 4. For Plumbing Construction
which involves the installation of lawn irrigation systems -$36.50 5. For Plumbing Construction which involves the installation of fire sprinkler systems: (a) for up to six (6) sprinkler
heads -$38.50 (b) for each additional sprinkler head -$ 0.45 6. For Plumbing Construction which involves the installation of standpipes, Siamese connections, fire hose connections and
fire hydrants -$22.40 for each hydrant or hose connection. 7. For Plumbing Construction which involves the installation of storm sewers, perimeter foundation drains, sanitary sewers
or water service lines: (a) for single or two-family dwellings -$36.50 each (b) for other than single or two-family dwellings: (i) first 30 metres or part thereof -$43.00 each (ii)
each additional 30 metres or part thereof -$22.40 each (iii) each sump, catchbasin, rock pit, dry well or manhole -$22.40
Building Bylaw No. 6925 -2012 Page 40 of 45 SCHEDULE “D” – Plumbing Permit Fees Effective January 1, 1999 8. Re-inspection fee where more than 1 re-inspection is required due to the
fault of the Permit holder -$35.50 for each extra re-inspection required. 9. Permit assignment or transfer fee -$30.25 10. Permit renewal -$30.25 11. Miscellaneous and special inspections:
(a) During normal working hours -$38.50 per hour; (b) Outside normal working hours -$55.50 per hour; (c) Minimum Charge -1 Hour. 12. Charges as shown below will be applicable for examination
of plans and specifications on application. (a) Plan Check Fee -$42.00 per hour (b) Single or Two Family Dwellings -minimum $30.25 per unit. (c) Other than Single or Two Family Dwellings
-minimum $105.00 per Building. 13. Business Licence Inspection Fee -minimum $30.25 per inspection, maximum $30.25per inspection. 14. Where Construction is started prior to obtaining
a Permit, the applicable Permit fee shall be doubled, but in no case shall the penalty amount doubled, exceed $1,600.00 per Building. 15. If the applicant makes an erroneous declaration
on the Permit application to obtain a lesser Permit fee, the Permit shall be revoked and a new Permit issued using the corrected information. The new Permit shall be calculated according
to the corrected Permit value and a 50% administrative fee shall be added to the calculated fee.
Building Bylaw No. 6925 -2012 Page 41 of 45 SCHEDULE “E” – Gas Permit Fees Effective January 1, 1999 The following fees shall be paid by the applicant for a Permit to install or alter
gas Construction: 1. For gas Construction which involves the replacement of an appliance or the installation of a new gas appliance. (a) for Single or Multi-Family Dwellings: (i) $24.50
per appliance, $31.50 minimum (b) for other than Single or Multi-Family Dwellings: (i) up to 102,000 BTU/hr $44.00 per appliance (ii) 102,001 -409,000 BTU/hr $60.50 per appliance NOTE:
Fee for additional appliances are calculated on BTU rating. 2. Where an application is made for a Permit for other than single family detached dwellings, there will be an additional
fee of $27.00 per dwelling unit. 3. Gas Heated Buildings -Building heat loss calculation review (i) $53.00 per Single Family Dwelling. (ii) $11.00 per unit for Multi Family Use -not
less than $53.00 per Building (iii) $105.00 per Building for other than Residential. 4. For gas Construction which involves the installation of vents or furnace plenums only -$24.50
each 5. For gas Construction which involves the installation of house piping: (a) for single or two family dwellings -$35.50 per unit; (b) for other than single or two family dwellings:
(i) first 30 metres or part thereof -$43.00 per unit plus (ii) each additional 30 metres or part thereof -$21.50 per unit 6. Re-inspection fee where more than one (1) inspection is
required due to faulty workmanship or materials -$35.50 for each extra re-inspection required. 7. Permit Renewal -$30.25 8. Permit Transfer -$30.25 9. Miscellaneous and special inspections:
(a) During normal working hours -$38.50 per hour; (b) Outside normal working hours -$55.50 per hour;
Building Bylaw No. 6925 -2012 Page 42 of 45 SCHEDULE “E” – Gas Permit Fees Effective January 1, 1999 (c) Minimum charge -l hour 10. Charges as shown below will be applicable for examination
of plans and specifications on application of Gas Permit. (a) Plan Check Fee -$42.00 per hour (b) Single or Two Family Dwellings -minimum $30.25 per unit (c) Other than Single or Two
Family Dwellings -minimum $121.00 per Building. 11. Oil and Propane Fee Schedule would follow the Gas Fee Schedule “E” in it's entirety. 12. Business Licence Inspection Fee -minimum
$30.25 per inspection, maximum $121.00 per inspection. 13. Where Construction is started prior to obtaining a Permit, the applicable Permit fee shall be doubled, but in no case shall
the penalty amount doubled, exceed $1,600.00 per Building. 14. If the applicant makes an erroneous declaration on the Permit application to obtain a lesser Permit fee, the Permit shall
be revoked and a new Permit issued using the corrected information. The new Permit shall be calculated according to the corrected Permit value and a 50% administrative fee shall be
added to the calculated fee.
Building Bylaw No. 6925 -2012 Page 43 of 45 SCHEDULE “F” – Electrical Permit Fees Effective January 1, 1999 The following fees shall be paid by the applicant for a Permit to install
Electrical Equipment: For one and two Family Dwellings including additions, the Permit fee shall be 15% of the building Permit fee or the minimum electrical Permit fee, whichever is
greater. The following additional charges are applicable to one and two family dwelling when the electrical Permit is taken out in conjunction with a building permit: 1. a) Each hot
tub or spa $12.80 b) Each hydro massage tub bath $10.30 c) Electrical Heating or based on the value $26.00 minimum of electrical heating contract, whichever is greater d) Air Conditioning
$10.30 per unit e) Each sub panel $10.30 Fees for all other work not included above For market value of Electrical Equipment, including costs of installation, of up to $200.00 -$31.25
For market value of Electrical Equipment, including costs of installation of $201.00 -$500.00 -$41.00 For market value of Electrical Equipment, including costs of installation of $501.00
-$1000.00 -$57.50 plus: $21.00 for each additional $l000.00 or part thereof up to $10,000.00 plus $ 8.10 for each additional $l000.00 or part thereof up to $100,000.00 plus $ 6.00 for
each additional $l000.00 or part thereof up to $250,000.00 plus $ 4.40 for each additional $l000.00 or part thereof up to $300,000.00 plus $ 3.40 for each additional $1000.00 or part
thereof over $300,000.00 to infinite. NOTE: Market values shall be based upon current estimated electrical installation costs. Where an application is made for an Electrical Permit
for other than Single Family Detached Dwellings, there will be an additional fee of $27.00 per dwelling unit. In addition to the above, the following fees shall be paid by the applicant
for a Permit to install Electrical Equipment. 2. Underground Service Duct -$25.70
Building Bylaw No. 6925 -2012 Page 44 of 45 SCHEDULE “F” – Electrical Permit Fees Effective January 1, 1999 3. Temporary: (a) Temporary to permanent connection conversion $23.40 (b)
Temporary Service connection $23.40 4. Temporary current Permit for uses other than carnivals: (a) Initial six (6) month period -$31.50 (b) Each additional six (6) month renewal period
-$28.25 5. Special Event Permit Including Carnivals: Each Location: $57.00 6. Movie Shoot Permit: (a) up to 14 days $79.00 (b) Annual permits, per location $155.00 (c) Inspections outside
normal working hours additional fee $206.00 7. Annual Permit: (a) for commercial or industrial facilities: (i) per KVA of service capacity .13 (ii) minimum fee $52.00 (iii) maximum
fee 1,576.00 (b) for educational or institutional facilities -$5.00 for each classroom, shop, laboratory, office, etc. 8. Pool Grounding Permit -$27.00 9. Re-inspection fee where more
than one (1) re-inspection is required due to faulty workmanship or materials -$35.50 for each extra re-inspection required. 10. Permit Transfer -$30.25 11. Permit Renewal -$30.25 12.
Miscellaneous and special inspections: (a) During normal working hours -$38.50 per hour; (b) Outside normal working hours -$55.50 per hour; (c) Minimum charge -One (1) hour.
Building Bylaw No. 6925 -2012 Page 45 of 45 SCHEDULE “F” – Electrical Permit Fees Effective January 1, 1999 13. Charges as shown below will be applicable for examination of plans and
specifications on application of electrical Permit. (a) Plan Check Fee -minimum $42.00 per hour (b) Single or Two Family Dwellings -minimum $30.25 per unit. (c) Other than Single or
Two Family Dwellings -minimum $105.00 per Building. 14. Business Licence Inspection Fee -minimum $30.25 per inspection, maximum $121.00 per inspection. 15. Where Construction is started
prior to obtaining a Permit, the applicable Permit fee shall be doubled, but in no case shall the penalty amount doubled, exceed $1,600.00 per Building. 16. If the applicant makes an
erroneous declaration of the Permit value to obtain a lesser Permit fee, the Permit shall be revoked and a new Permit issued using the corrected value. The new Permit shall be calculated
according to the corrected Permit value and a 50% administrative fee shall be added to the calculated fee.
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: E03-012-002 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT:
GVWD Drinking Water Management Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) has recently adopted the updated Drinking Water Management Plan (DWMP) originally
developed in 2005, and is seeking municipal endorsement of the plan. The DWMP is part of a suite of regional plans that are supported by the Region’s Sustainability Framework. For the
implementation of the DWMP to be successful, the GVWD and member municipalities are required to work together to implement the actions. A copy of the DWMP is attached to this report
and it is recommended that Council support the ongoing implementation of the municipal actions contained within the plan. Metro Vancouver’s report entitled “Adoption of the 2011 Drinking
Water Management Plan” indicates that “the 2011 update of the DWMP does not include any new actions for Metro Vancouver that are not included in existing programs and budgets or any
new actions for municipalities from the existing [2005] DWMP.” RECOMMENDATION: THAT the Greater Vancouver Water District’s Drinking Water Management Plan be endorsed; and THAT the implementation
of appropriate municipal actions in support of the Drinking Water Management Plan be subject to review through the District’s annual Business Planning process. DISCUSSION: a) Background
Context: The DWMP outlines goals, strategies and actions for municipalities and Metro Vancouver to achieve in supplying clean, safe drinking water to more than 2.3 million people and
associated businesses. The plan has three primary goals which are supported by strategies and actions: Provide Clean, Safe Drinking Water Ensure the Sustainable use of Water Resources
Ensure the Efficient Supply of Water For implementation of the DWMP to be successful, both the regional and municipal governments are required to take appropriate actions as identified
within the DWMP. 1110
The District approved the original 2005 DWMP in January 2006. In early 2011, the GVWD Board directed Metro Vancouver staff to proceed with consultation on an update to the 2005 DWMP.
A draft of the updated DWMP was reviewed by the Regional Engineers Advisory Committee (REAC), the REAC Water Sub-Committee and the public. District staff participated in the REAC and
REAC Water Sub-Committee reviews. After considering feedback on the draft plan, the GVWD Board approved the updated DWMP on July 29, 2011. Metro Vancouver has previously requested that
member municipalities adopt the plan. The majority of municipalities have adopted the plan. Metro Vancouver’s report entitled “Adoption of the 2011 Drinking Water Management Plan” indicates
that “the 2011 update of the DWMP does not include any new actions for Metro Vancouver that are not included in existing programs and budgets or any new actions for municipalities from
the existing [2005] DWMP.” However, the 2011 DWMP is different from the 2005 document in layout and wording. For example, while the 2005 DWMP indicates that “the GVWD and its members
commit to achieving a retail water structure that reflects the long-run marginal cost of regional water supply,” the 2011 DWMP is more specific, specifying separate Metro Vancouver
and Municipal actions. The Metro Vancouver action (2.1.4) is to “set the wholesale water rates and water rate structure to reflect the cost of regional water supply, and achieve water
conservation and other sustainability objectives.” The municipal action (2.1.10) is to “achieve a retail water rate structure that reflects the cost of regional water supply and, if
practical, the regional seasonal price structure.” The DWMP is not required by senior government legislation. However, it does align with several provincial initiatives such as the
Action Plan for Safe Drinking Water in British Columbia, Living Water Smart: British Columbia’s Water Plan, the Water Sustainability Act, the BC Climate Action Plan and Integrated Resource
Recovery. The DWMP reaffirms ongoing practices adopted by the District and identifies a few opportunities for potential improvement. b) Desired Outcome: To obtain Council’s endorsement
and approval to implement appropriate municipal actions in support of the updated regional DWMP. c) Strategic Alignment: The DWMP supports several of the Visions and Key Strategies
documented in the District’s Corporate Strategic Plan, including those related to Environment, Smart Managed Growth, Financial Management, and Inter-Government Relations/Networks. d)
Citizens/Customer Implications: The DWMP has been developed to deliver quality water and customer service to municipalities and ultimately to District water utility customers. Endorsement
of the DWMP and the municipal actions will serve customers well. e) Interdepartmental Implications: The municipal actions outlined in the updated DWMP are implemented through the efforts
of several departments, including Engineering, Operations, Finance, Licenses Permits and Bylaws, and Communications.
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The updated DWMP is not significantly different from the 2005 version of the plan approved by Council. Therefore, there is little impact to the
Business Plan and initiatives will be reviewed and cost implications will be noted through the annual Business Planning process. CONCLUSIONS: The Drinking Water Management Plan is an
action oriented plan which provides direction and priority for drinking water initiatives in the Region. The plan ensures that the water needs of the Region will be met in an affordably
and sustainably for at least the next 25 years. The GVWD Board has adopted an updated 2011 Drinking Water Management Plan and has requested that member municipalities consider adoption
as well. The District of Maple Ridge has already adopted the 2005 version of the Drinking Water Management Plan and incorporated it into the District’s Business Plan. As such, the 2011
Drinking Water Management Plan is seen as a worthwhile guiding document that should be endorsed. “Original signed by David Pollock” _______________________________________________ Prepared
by: David Pollock, PEng. Municipal Engineer “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. General Manager: Public
Works & Development Services “Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule _______________________________________________ Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer JD/mi Attachment:
Metro Vancouver’s 2011 Drinking Water Management Plan
Drinking Water Management Plan Metro Vancouver www.metrovancouver.org JUNE 2011 SUSTAINABLE REGION INITIATIVE... TURNING IDEAS INTO ACTION
TablE of CoNTENTs VISION ..............................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................1 PART ONE: PLAN OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................
............................................................2 Metro VancouVer SuStainability FraMework .......................................................................... 2 regional
ViSion .................................................................................................................................. 2 context For the Drinking water ManageMent
Plan ........................................................... 4 History ...........................................................................................................................
.....................................4 Trends, Challenges, Opportunities ...................................................................................................................4
Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................................................................4 Provincial Government Oversight
of Drinking Water Systems .......................................................................5 Aligning with Provincial Initiatives ..............................................................
.......................................................6 Coordinating with other Metro Vancouver Plans .............................................................................................7
PART TWO: GOALS, STRATEGIES and ACTIONS .............................................................................................................10 goal 1: ProViDe clean, SaFe Drinking
water ............................................................................10 Strategy 1.1 Use a risk management multi-barrier approach from source to tap ...........................10
Strategy 1.2 Manage watersheds to provide clean, safe water .........................................................11 Strategy 1.3 Identify and secure additional water supplies for
the region .......................................12 goal 2: enSure the SuStainable uSe oF water reSourceS ....................................................12 Strategy 2.1 Use drinking
water sustainably ........................................................................................12 Strategy 2.2 Match water quality to usage requirements ..................................
.................................14 Strategy 2.3 Manage and protect watersheds as natural assets ........................................................15 goal 3: enSure the eFFicient
SuPPly oF water .........................................................................16 Strategy 3.1 Manage infrastructure proactively............................................................
.......................16 Strategy 3.2 Optimize capacity through effective partnerships .........................................................17 PERFORMANCE MEASURES ..............................
...........................................................................................................................................18 Adaptive Management .....................................
..............................................................................................18 Figures and Tables Figure 1 Metro Vancouver’s Sustainability Framework ...............................
................................................... 3 Figure 2 Roles and responsibilities in the provision of safe drinking water sourced from Metro Vancouver’s watersheds ...........................
.............................................................................. 5 Figure 3 Metro Vancouver’s Interconnected Management Plans ...........................................................
...... 7 Table 1 Linkages between Metro Vancouver Management Plans .................................................................8
1 Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 ThE DriNkiNg WaTEr MaNagEMENT PlaN Metro Vancouver and member municipalities work together to supply clean, safe drinking water to more than
2.3 million people and associated businesses in the Metro Vancouver region. The Drinking Water Management Plan (DWMP) ensures that our region’s water needs will be met affordably and
sustainably. This will be done by using water more efficiently so that the water supply stretches out into the future even as the region’s population continues to grow and increasing
supply from the Coquitlam Lake reservoir. The investments in water treatment, supply and conservation programs included in this plan will increase the cost of drinking water but the
benefits include consistently higher quality drinking water, improved supply reliability, and greater environmental protection. Metro Vancouver commits to provide clean, safe drinking
water and ensure its sustainable use. VisioN
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 2ParT oNE: PlaN oVErViEW Metro Vancouver is a political body and corporate entity operating under provincial legislation as a ‘regional district’
and ‘greater boards’ that delivers regional services, planning and political leadership on behalf of 24 local authorities. it comprises of: CITY OF COQUITLAM CORPORATION OF DELTA CITY
OF LANGLEY ELECTORAL AREA A (UNINCORPORATED AREA) CITY OF ABBOTSFORD VILLAGE OF ANMORE VILLAGE OF BELCARRA BOWEN ISLAND MUNICIPALITY CITY OF BURNABY TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY VILLAGE OF LIONS
BAY DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE CITY OF NEW WESTMINSTER CITY OF NORTH VANCOUVER DISTRICT OF NORTH VANCOUVER CITY OF PITT MEADOWS CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM CITY OF PORT MOODY CITY OF RICHMOND
CITY OF SURREY TSAWWASSEN FIRST NATION CITY OF VANCOUVER DISTRICT OF WEST VANCOUVER CITY OF WHITE ROCK Metro Vancouver sustainability framework Since 2002 Metro Vancouver has formally
put the concept of sustainability at the centre of its operating and planning philosophy and advanced its role as a leader in the attempt to make the region one which is explicitly
committed to a sustainable future. This comprehensive endeavour became known as the Sustainable Region Initiative, or more familiarly as the ‘SRI’. In 2008, Metro Vancouver’s Board
adopted a Sustainability Framework outlining its vision, mission, values, sustainability imperatives, and sustainability principles. Depicted in Figure 1, the Sustainability Framework
provides the foundation for Metro Vancouver’s suite of plans, including the Drinking Water Management Plan (DWMP). regional Vision Metro Vancouver has an opportunity and a vision to
achieve what humanity aspires to on a global basis – the highest quality of life embracing cultural vitality, economic prosperity, social justice and compassion, all nurtured in and
by a beautiful and healthy natural environment. We will achieve this vision by embracing and applying the principles of sustainability, not least of which is an unshakeable commitment
to the well-being of current and future generations and the health of our planet, in everything we do. As we share our efforts in achieving this vision, we are confident that the inspiration
and mutual learning we gain will become vital ingredients in our hopes for a sustainable common future.
3 Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 ...these are the foundation for Metro Vancouver’s three interconnected roles: rEgioNal VisioN The highest quality of life embracing cultural
vitality, economic prosperity, social justice and compassion, all nurtured in and by a beautiful and healthy natural environment. Achieved by an unshakeable commitment to the well-being
of current and future generations and the health of our planet, in everything we do. METro VaNCoUVEr rolE aND MissioN Serve the region and attain excellence in meeting these responsibilities.
Plan for the future by developing and using an integrated system of plans. Facilitate collaboration with local governments and citizens. ValUEs Integrity is our foundation. Passion
for our work and pride in our accomplishments are our drivers. Respect for the public and compassion in our relationships are our guideposts. sUsTaiNabiliTY iMPEraTiVEs Have regard
for local and global consequences and long-term impacts. Recognize and reflect the interconnectedness and interdependence of systems. Be collaborative. sUsTaiNabiliTY PriNCiPlEs Protect
and enhance the natural environment. Provide for ongoing prosperity. Build community capacity and social cohesion. The Metro Vancouver Sustainability Framework METriCs, TargETs and
kEY DEliVErablEs Progress towards a sustainable region is measured by which establish strategic priorities and key activities figure 1 Metro Vancouver’s Sustainability Framework Physical
& Social Development Environment Utilities services Providing services to local governments and their communities Policy Developing and using an integrated system of plans; includes
some regulatory responsibilities Political forum building and facilitating collaborative processes among governments and citizens Drinking Water Liquid Waste Solid Waste Parks and Greenways
Air Quality Climate Change and Energy Ecological Health Growth Management Regional Emergency Management Food System Affordable Housing Other issues including: Transportation Policing
Economic Dev’t Ports 123 Cultural Grants and Information
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 4 roles and responsibilities Metro Vancouver and its municipalities work together to supply clean, safe drinking water to more than 2.3 million
people and associated businesses in the Metro Vancouver region. In this Drinking Water Management Plan reference to Metro Vancouver usually means the Greater Vancouver Water District
(GVWD) and reference to municipalities means GVWD member municipalities and member treaty first nation, Tsawwassen First Nation. Metro Vancouver owns and operates the water supply,
treatment and regional water supply system while municipalities own and operate the local water distribution systems to supply water to residents and businesses. Homeowners, building
owners, industry, commercial businesses, and institutions also have a role and responsibility in ensuring their piping systems are in good order once water enters their property. Metro
Vancouver and its municipalities are taking steps to improve water monitoring and metering systems, to improve energy efficiency, and to implement what can be considered the 5Rs of
resource management (reduce, reuse, reclaim, recover, and respect the use of water for other purposes). This updated DWMP provides the direction and priority for drinking water initiatives
in a sustainable context. Context for the Drinking Water Management Plan history The forested Capilano, Seymour, and Coquitlam Watersheds are the source of water supply for Metro Vancouver.
Access to these mountainous watersheds is restricted and these protected watersheds have long been a key component in the region’s water supply system. In 2005, the Board of the Greater
Vancouver Water District approved the Drinking Water Management Plan (DWMP) for Metro Vancouver and its member municipalities. In 2007, the Plan was amended to fully incorporate management
of the source watersheds. Since that time, a number of changes have occurred to improve the quantity and quality of water, the most notable being the commissioning of the Seymour-Capilano
Filtration Plant. trends, challenges, opportunities Metro Vancouver currently has sufficient quantities of water from its source watersheds to meet the region’s needs until at least
mid-century. Water continues to be a key economic, social, and environmental driver but demand for this resource will increase with time. The region is expected to grow by 35,000 people
per year for the next few decades. Population growth will place demands not only on water supply, but also on water infrastructure if not carefully planned. While climate change predictions
do not show a large shift in the amount of precipitation for the region, they do indicate that snow packs at lower elevations will decrease, springs will be earlier, and summers will
be longer. These predicted changes in climate may place more stress on the drinking water supply system. In addition, predicted increases in storm activity during the rainy season may
result in increased slope failures and river channel instability leading to increased turbidity in source reservoirs and increased treatment costs. Further opportunities can be identified
to continue the trend of declining per-capita water use.
5 Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 Provincial government oversight of Drinking water Systems British Columbia’s health authorities have a key role in providing provincial government
oversight of drinking water systems. In particular, provincial government direction on provision of safe drinking water is administered locally by drinking water officers, public health
engineers and medical health officers through issuance of an operating permit. The Metro Vancouver drinking water system is built and operated as one water system with portions of the
system in the two Health Authorities that cover the Lower Mainland; Vancouver Coastal Health, and Fraser Health. The Vancouver Coastal Health drinking water officers provide surveillance
and monitoring of those aspects of Metro Vancouver’s drinking water systems that may affect public health. They also administer and enforce the Drinking Water Protection Act, the Drinking
Water Protection Regulation and the Health Act (Figure 2). figure 2 roles and responsibilities in the provision of safe drinking water sourced from Metro Vancouver’s watersheds Ministry
of health creates and “owns” Drinking water Protection act and regulation health authority administration & enforcement of legislation /regulation Water system owners Metro Vancouver,
Municipalities & treaty First nations (Provision of Safe Drinking water + notification of water Quality Problems) bC Water and Waste association and others education & training Providers
environmental operations certification Program building owners Public and End Users
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 6Drinking water officers and public health engineers are contacted prior to the alteration of the drinking water system regarding construction
permits and changes to operating permits. Water suppliers, such as Metro Vancouver and municipalities, have the water from their systems analyzed for the presence of microbiological
pathogens and other indicator organisms by laboratories approved by the Provincial Health Officer. From a water allocation or water quantity perspective, the Provincial Water Act is
central to the water governance framework. The Provincial Water Act was last changed in 2004, driven primarily by growing concerns for the protection of drinking water quality. In addition
to a new Drinking Water Protection Act, the 2004 Water Act amendments provided B.C. with its first mechanisms to protect groundwater and a process for watershed management planning
to address or prevent conflicts among or between water users and the environment, and the protection of water quality. aligning with Provincial initiatives The strategies and actions
identified in the Drinking Water Management Plan (DWMP) align with the following recent Provincial initiatives: aCTioN PlaN for safE DriNkiNg WaTEr iN briTish ColUMbia This plan includes
comprehensive legislation and measures to protect drinking water from source to tap by improving monitoring, treatment, reporting, and accountability to the public. The Province’s Action
Plan sets out specific principles and actions to ensure British Columbians enjoy safe, clean, healthy drinking water as effectively, efficiently, and reliably as possible. The DWMP
addresses all these concerns and continues to update them as required as best management practices evolve. liViNg WaTEr sMarT: briTish ColUMbia’s WaTEr PlaN Water Smart objectives supported
by the DWMP include supporting rainwater harvesting and water reclamation actions, helping to address the impacts of climate change, and implementing actions that result in matching
water quality to usage requirements. WaTEr sUsTaiNabiliTY aCT (ProPosED rEVisioN To ThE WaTEr aCT) This proposed new act would revise the Water Act to lessen our water footprint and
transition to a new way of managing water. This includes a number of water policies that propose to improve water use efficiency, conservation, protect stream health and aquatic environments,
and regulate water during scarcity. bC CliMaTE aCTioN PlaN This Plan sets a provincial target of 33 percent less greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050. The DWMP contributes
to meeting these targets by prioritizing gravity systems where possible, assessing hydropower at existing reservoir dams, recovering energy where feasible and upgrading pump technologies.
iNTEgraTED rEsoUrCE rECoVErY Integrated Resource Recovery (IRR), formally defined by the Province in 2008 in a report titled Resources from Waste: A Guide to Integrated Resource Recovery,
is a concept and approach that integrates the management of water, wastewater, energy, and solid waste services to recover resources and value to help increase resiliency.
7 Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 coordinating with other Metro Vancouver Plans The Drinking Water Management Plan is one plan among a suite of interconnected management plans
developed around Metro Vancouver’s Sustainability Framework (Figure 3). The following section summarizes key links between Metro Vancouver’s plans and outlines where actions identified
in other Metro Vancouver plans affect the Drinking Water Management Plan, and conversely where actions in this DWMP make a contribution to the goals of other Metro Vancouver plans.
Air Quality Regional Growth Finance Drinking Water Food System Liquid Waste Parks & Greenways Housing Solid Waste figure 3 Metro Vancouver’s interconnected Management Plans
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 8 Linkages Between Metro Vancouver Plans iNTEgraTED liQUiD WasTE aND rEsoUrCE MaNagEMENT PlaN Support of on-site rainwater management and actions
to reclaim water contribute to the sustainable use of water in the region. DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Support for using non-potable water for appropriate uses. Actions that support
improvements in water conservation and reuse should reduce the amount of wastewater that has to be treated at wastewater treatment plants. rEgioNal groWTh sTraTEgY A compact urban area
uses infrastructure more efficiently and places less demand on the overall system, specifically in terms of outdoor water use. DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Provision of clean, safe
drinking water is integral to complete communities and a sustainable economy. Protected watersheds are a large portion of the region’s conservation lands. iNTEgraTED soliD WasTE aND
rEsoUrCE MaNagEMENT PlaN Programs that inform and educate the public of the benefits of waste reduction support the objectives of the Tap Water Campaign. DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Success in the Tap Water Campaign will reduce the amount of waste associated with bottle water use. outPut inPut outPut inPut outPut inPut Table 1 Metro Vancouver Management Plan linkages
9 Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 Linkages Between Metro Vancouver Plans rEgioNal fooD sYsTEMs sTraTEgY Support for adoption of environmentally sustainable irrigation practices
and technologies will minimize agricultural demand for water. DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Provision of clean, safe drinking water is a necessary input for food processing and agricultural
use. Efforts to promote water conservation and reclaimation will reduce demand on the region’s water resources making more water available for in-stream use. air QUaliTY MaNagEMENT
PlaN Reducing deposition of air contaminants will minimize the contamination of water resources and foster the provision of clean, safe drinking water. DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Ensuring that drinking water is produced, distributed, and used efficiently will minimize energy consumption and associated greenhouse gases. rEgioNal Parks aND grEENWaYs PlaN Expanding
the regional greenways system will involve working with water and wastewater utilities. DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Public access in the Lower Seymour Conservation Reserve provides
opportunities for recreational activities, outdoor experiences, and programs to foster environmental stewardship. outPut inPut outPut inPut outPut inPut
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 10goal 1: Provide Clean, Safe Drinking Water Metro Vancouver and its municipalities are committed to providing reliable access to adequate quantities
of clean, safe drinking water to the citizens and businesses of Metro Vancouver. ParT TWo: goals, sTraTEgiEs and aCTioNs strategy 1.1 Use a risk management multi-barrier approach from
source to tap Beginning with protected source watersheds, the region’s water supply system provides multiple barriers to contamination. Projects such as the Seymour-Capilano Filtration
Plant and the addition of the ultraviolet treatment plant at Coquitlam will further reduce the risks to water quality. METro VaNCoUVEr Will: 1.1.1 Complete the Seymour-Capilano Filtration
Project. 2013 1.1.2 Improve the primary disinfection treatment of Coquitlam source water for Cryptosporidium by adding ultraviolet treatment. 2013 1.1.3 Complete the reassessment of
the secondary disinfection system after completion of the Seymour-Capilano Filtration Project. 2016 oN-goiNg aCTioNs 1.1.4 Preserve water quality in the Metro Vancouver system by utilizing
best management practices that include urban reservoir cleaning and circulating water to maintain appropriate chlorine levels. 1.1.5 Monitor water supply and water quality and use this
information to optimize source water treatment, operation of the Metro Vancouver water system and rechlorination programs, and communicate system changes to agencies and municipalities
as appropriate.
11 Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 1.1.6 Implement, administer, and maintain backflow prevention and cross-connection control programs within the Metro Vancouver system to protect
the public water system from hazards originating on customers’ premises or from temporary connections. 1.1.7 Ensure continuous improvement for the management and operation of the Metro
Vancouver water system by ongoing application of Metro Vancouver’s Management System for Drinking Water. 1.1.8 Present an annual Metro Vancouver Water Quality Report to the Board of
Directors. MUNiCiPaliTiEs Will: 1.1.9 Complete the reassessment of the secondary disinfection system within the municipal distribution network in coordination with Metro Vancouver after
completion of the Seymour-Capilano Filtration Project. 2016 oN-goiNg aCTioNs 1.1.10 Monitor water quality in the municipal distribution systems and use this information to optimize
water quality through operation of the municipal water system. 1.1.11 Preserve water quality in the distribution system through proactive maintenance programs that include water main
flushing, cleaning of municipal reservoirs, and eliminating dead-ends where possible. 1.1.12 Implement, administer, and maintain backflow prevention and cross-connection control programs
within the municipal distribution system to protect the public water system from hazards originating on customers’ premises or from temporary connections. strategy 1.2 Manage watersheds
to provide clean, safe water Metro Vancouver’s closed and protected watersheds minimizes human access and human activity and significantly reduces the risk from microbiological or chemical
contamination and fires. METro VaNCoUVEr Will: 1.2.1 Where feasible and appropriate, restore disturbed areas and deactivate watershed roads that are no longer required to minimize the
risk of landslides and erosion, and reduce long-term maintenance costs. 2013 oN-goiNg aCTioNs 1.2.2 Provide reliable and timely information on source water quality, stream flow, and
fire risk to minimize risks to water quality, manage source reservoirs and optimize water treatment. 1.2.3 Manage the watersheds with a minimum intervention approach. Intervention is
only necessary for building infrastructure or if there are risks to water quality or human safety. 1.2.4 Work in cooperation with adjoining municipalities and other organizations with
infrastructure on watershed lands to minimize risks to water quality. 1.2.5 Reduce the risk from microbiological or chemical contamination by restricting access to the source watersheds
as specified in Metro Vancouver’s Watershed Access Policy.
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 12 strategy 1.3 Identify and secure additional water supplies for the region By making greater use of the storage capacity of Coquitlam reservoir
our present sources of water offer a secure water supply that will meet our needs until about mid-century. METro VaNCoUVEr Will: 1.3.1 Complete the Seymour-Capilano Filtration Project
and initiate conceptual design of the new Coquitlam intake facility to access additional water supplies. 2013 1.3.2 Provide for additional capacity by securing full access to the Coquitlam
source under the Coquitlam Water Use Plan and the current forecast predicts expanding storage capacity in Seymour and Capilano Watersheds by 2050. The schedule for storage expansion
will be monitored and storage expanded as needed. aCTioNs rEQUEsTED of oThEr goVErNMENTs aND agENCiEs (oN-goiNg aCTioN) 1.3.3 That senior governments, universities, and research agencies
continue to assess the potential impacts of climate change on the need for additional water supplies or storage capacity and advise Metro Vancouver on the results of this research.
goal 2: Ensure the Sustainable Use of Water Resources By ensuring the sustainable use of water resources, the region can continue to grow and prosper while sustaining our quality of
life and our environment. strategy 2.1 Use drinking water sustainably Metro Vancouver and its municipalities are committed to pursuing demand management strategies where using water
more sustainably will contribute to economic prosperity, community well-being and environmental integrity. METro VaNCoUVEr Will: (oN-goiNg aCTioNs) 2.1.1 Deliver education programs
promoting behaviour change by means of: • sustainability education resources; • watershed field trips; • sustainability initiatives at schools; • information outreach programs promoting
behaviour change and sustainable use of water.
13 Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 2.1.2 Implement a region wide water conservation program targeting the industrial, commercial, institutional and agricultural sectors in partnership
with municipalities. Program elements include water audits, informative resources and case studies. 2.1.3 Deliver the Tap Water Campaign to educate people about Metro Vancouver’s high
quality drinking water and to reduce the environmental impact of bottled water. 2.1.4 Set the wholesale water rates and water rate structure to reflect the cost of regional water supply,
and achieve water conservation and other sustainability objectives. 2.1.5 Work with the business sector on water conservation and water reuse initiatives in partnership with municipalities.
2.1.6 Develop the Seymour Water Treatment and Watershed Academy to support innovative research and demonstration projects. MUNiCiPaliTiEs Will: 2.1.7 Reassess the merits of developing
residential water metering programs and municipal rebate programs for water efficient fixtures and appliances. 2015 oN-goiNg aCTioNs 2.1.8 Develop, implement and enforce consistent
bylaws to encourage water efficiency and implement Metro Vancouver’s Water Shortage Response Plan. 2.1.9 Work with the business sector on water conservation and water reuse initiatives
in partnership with Metro Vancouver. 2.1.10 Achieve a retail water rate structure that reflects the cost of regional water supply and, if practical, the regional seasonal price structure.
2.1.11 Deliver education programs promoting behaviour change and sustainable use of water.
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 14 strategy 2.2 Match water quality to usage requirements Many of the purposes for which drinking water is currently used do not require use
of water of potable quality. METro VaNCoUVEr Will: 2.2.1 Install facilities for water reclamation at wastewater treatment plants to provide reclaimed water for use within and outside
wastewater plants where feasible. 2011-2016 oN-goiNg aCTioN 2.2.2 Evaluate alternatives to potable water for specific purposes, including: • rainwater harvesting for irrigation; • greywater
and reclaimed wastewater for residential, commercial, institutional, and agricultural use; • groundwater for irrigation; • river and sea water for waterfront businesses. MUNiCiPaliTiEs
Will: 2.2.3 Update municipal bylaws, utility design standards and neighbourhood design guidelines to enable and encourage on-site rainwater management as appropriate, so that it can
be used for non-potable purposes such as irrigation. 2014 aCTioNs rEQUEsTED of oThEr goVErNMENTs, agENCiEs, aND assoCiaTioNs: (oN-goiNg aCTioNs) 2.2.4 Revise the provincial health regulations
to allow specific residential and commercial uses of non-potable water (greywater and rainwater) after discussions with Metro Vancouver and municipalities. 2.2.5 Facilitate networking
for re-use of process wastewater with business associations, institutions, and non-governmental organizations.
15 Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 strategy 2.3 Manage and protect watersheds as natural assets Managing and protecting watershed lands and their biological diversity as natural
assets and as part of the region’s conservation lands significantly advances regional sustainability METro VaNCoUVEr Will: (oN-goiNg aCTioNs) 2.3.1 Manage watershed lands and their
biological diversity to advance regional sustainability. 2.3.2 Manage the on-drainage watershed lands with a minimum intervention approach. 2.3.3 Protect and conserve fish populations
while continuing to provide clean, safe drinking water. 2.3.4 Provide non-motorized recreational opportunities on off-drainage watersheds lands where appropriate. 2.3.5 Develop and
implement a Joint Water Use Plan for the Seymour and Capilano Watersheds.
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 16goal 3: Ensure the Efficient Supply of Water Efficient supply of water optimizes capacity and defers the need for new infrastructure and new
water supply sources. Equally important is renewing and replacing the region’s aging water transmission and distribution systems in an affordable way. strategy 3.1 Manage infrastructure
proactively Managing infrastructure proactively will ensure costeffective, reliable and sustainable water supply. METro VaNCoUVEr Will: (oN-goiNg aCTioNs) 3.1.1 Develop and implement
an Asset Management Plan targeted at maintaining delivery of reliable and cost-effective drinking water services to the region over the next 100 years. 3.1.2 Renew and replace aging
infrastructure to maintain required levels of service based on risk analyses (including seismic risk) and cost-benefit priorities. 3.1.3 Undertake cost-effective leak identification
and repair programs targeting water transmission mains with high breakage rates or that are older than 50 years. 3.1.4 Implement, where feasible and appropriate, pressure reduction
or pressure management programs (including pressure transients) to reduce leakage and potentially extend the life of the infrastructure. 3.1.5 Conduct hazard assessments specific to
trespassing, excavations over pipes and pressure loss and implement emergency and security programs to reduce risks. 3.1.6 Upgrade the energy efficiency of the system by prioritizing
gravity systems and where possible recovering surplus energy and upgrading pump and motor efficiencies. 3.1.7 Upon completion of a Joint Water Use Plan for the Capilano and Seymour
Watersheds, assess the feasibility of developing hydropower at the Cleveland and Seymour Falls dams. MUNiCiPaliTiEs Will: (oN-goiNg aCTioNs) 3.1.8 Renew and replace aging infrastructure
to maintain required levels of service based on risk analyses and cost-benefit priorities specific to the needs of each municipality. 3.1.9 Undertake cost-effective leak identification
and repair programs targeting the municipal water system. 3.1.10 Implement, where feasible and appropriate, pressure reduction or pressure management programs (including pressure transients)
to reduce leakage and potentially extend the life of the infrastructure.
17 Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 oN-goiNg aCTioNs 3.2.2 Based on the projected growth in population and economic activity in Metro Vancouver’s approved Regional Growth Strategy,
plan and construct required Metro Vancouver facilities. 3.2.3 Install water meters on all new municipal system connections to Metro Vancouver’s water mains. 3.2.4 Further enhance lawn
sprinkling regulations to address both seasonal and peak day consumption issues in partnership with municipalities. MUNiCiPaliTiEs Will: (oN-goiNg aCTioN) 3.2.5 Further enhance lawn
sprinkling regulations to address both seasonal and peak day consumption issues in partnership with other municipalities and Metro Vancouver. strategy 3.2 Optimize capacity through
effective partnerships Gaining effi ciency and optimizing capacity through more effective communications and partnerships enables more to be done with less. METro VaNCoUVEr Will: 3.2.1
Maintain a system of seasonal pricing and confirm that the cost of providing water in the summer season continues to be 1.25 times the cost of providing water during the remainder of
the year and make seasonal pricing adjustments accordingly. 2014
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 18 PErforMaNCE MEasUrEs The following performance measures will monitor progress in achieving the goals of the Drinking Water Management Plan
(DWMP). Performance should be considered in the context of industry standards and performance by other utilities in other jurisdictions. Goal 1: Provide Clean, Safe Drinking Water 1.
Treated water samples negative for E. coli bacteria (striving for 100%). 2. Treated water samples negative for total coli forms (striving for high percentages). 3. Percent of untreated
source water samples exceeding 20 E. coli/100 ml (striving for low percentage). Goal 2: Ensure the Sustainable Use of Water Resources 4. Per capita water use by residential customers
(trend over time and compare to other jurisdictions). 5. Per capita water use by all customers (trend over time and compare to other jurisdictions). 6. Peak day per capita water use
by all customers (trend over time and compare to other jurisdictions). 7. Greenhouse gases generated in treating and delivering water (per cubic meter of water delivered by Metro Vancouver
and net of energy recovery). Goal 3: Ensure the Efficient Supply of Water 8. Metro Vancouver’s Water Rate (trend over time and compare changes in Metro Vancouver to changes in other
jurisdictions). 9. Metro Vancouver’s drinking water budget (trend over time and compare changes in Metro Vancouver to changes in other jurisdictions). 10. Kilowatt hours of energy used
in treating and delivering water (per cubic meter of water delivered by Metro Vancouver and net of energy recovery). adaptive Management As the region grows and changes, the science
of water management improves, and public values evolve, the DWMP will be reviewed and revised. An adaptive management approach is proposed with a DWMP progress report every two years
and a comprehensive review of the plan every five years.
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: E03-012-001 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT:
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The District of Maple Ridge (District) operates a Municipal Water Utility under permit by the Fraser Health Authority (FHA) that
requires an annual report be prepared and submitted to the FHA and be available to the public. The report follows the format required by the FHA and is necessarily a largely technical
report. To assist the general public, a less technical brochure has been produced and will be available on the District’s website and at the Municipal Hall Customer Service Centre.
This report is for information and the attached “Drinking Water Quality Report 2011” includes an outline of the regulatory framework, water quality monitoring data for 2011, and explanatory
comments on the data. A copy of the report will be placed in the public library and on the corporate website as part of the public information strategy. In 2011, water quality within
the District’s municipal water distribution system met the standards detailed in the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation. RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information only and
no resolution is required. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The District operates a Municipal Water Utility under the provisions of the provincial Local Government Act, and under
permit by the Provincial Ministry of Health Services -Fraser Health Authority (FHA). Water quality requirements are stipulated by the Provincial Drinking Water Protection Regulations
and administered by the FHA. The District, as a distributor and purveyor of drinking water, is reliant on the Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) for source water quality control.
Treated water is delivered to the District by the GVWD via a transmission main and the 248 Street Reservoir. While Coquitlam Lake is the primary source of water delivered to Maple Ridge,
the GVWD can supply Maple Ridge with Seymour Lake water in the event of disruptions at Coquitlam Lake. The District’s drinking water system operating permit requires a water quality
monitoring program and that an annual report be prepared and submitted. While the monitoring program provides a representative picture of drinking water quality within municipal mains,
it 1111
does not provide a definite picture of drinking water quality within buildings, where water quality can change significantly due to pipe materials, standing times, temperature, and other
factors. It can be assumed that samples taken within buildings may be of different quality than those taken from municipal mains. The District is not responsible for testing/verifying
water quality on private property. The District’s water distribution infrastructure includes 379 km of water main, over 18,000 connections, 7 pump stations, 6 reservoirs, and 5 re-chlorination
stations. Samples from 18 locations in the distribution system are taken weekly and are analyzed by Metro Vancouver. The results are sent to the Operations and Engineering Departments
and to the FHA for review. In 2011, no samples tested positive for E. coli, and no samples exceeded the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation microbiological standard of 10 total
coliforms per 100mL. b) Strategic Alignment: Financial Management Council has directed that the District provide high quality municipal services to our citizens and customers in a cost
effective and efficient manner. The annual water quality monitoring program is intended to ensure that the water delivered by the District’s utility is of high quality. Smart Managed
Growth The Corporate Strategic Plan directs that municipal infrastructure be protected and managed through the preparation of appropriate plans to ensure maintenance of the system.
A systematic water quality monitoring plan assists in ensuring that an effective water distribution system is managed and maintained. Intergovernmental Relations/Partnerships Council
has directed that the District develop and maintain strong positive working relationships with the GVWD and other governmental agencies. The District currently benefits from good working
relationships with the GVWD and FHA in the cooperative provision of quality drinking water. The annual monitoring program and report facilitates this effective relationship. c) Citizen/Customer
Implications: Maple Ridge water utility customers expect that the investment in the network be maintained to provide safe, reliable and high quality water. The annual reporting of water
quality is a means to meet the accountability that customers expect. Ongoing improvements by Metro Vancouver will continue to improve regional water quality. d) Interdepartmental Implications:
As part of the Public Works and Development Services Division, the Engineering and Operations Departments collaborate in the water utility’s planning, management, operation, maintenance
and water quality reporting to meet water quality objectives. e) Policy Implications: The reporting of water quality is consistent with the public policy approach of transparency and
accountability as well as meeting the requirements of the FHA.
CONCLUSIONS: The District monitored drinking water quality in 2011 in accordance with the Provincial mandate. Testing indicated that all samples met the standards detailed in the provincial
Drinking Water Protection Regulation. The “Drinking Water Quality Report 2011” documents the water quality monitoring program and test results. The document was prepared in accordance
with Fraser Health Authority requirements and will be available to the public. “Original signed by David Pollock” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: David
Pollock, PEng. Municipal Engineer “Original signed by Frank Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. General Manager: Public Works
& Development Services “Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule ______________________________________________ Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer JD/mi Attachment:
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011 June 4, 2012
DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................
. 1 2 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 2 3 BACKGROUND ...........................
............................................................................................................... 3 3.1 SOURCE WATER ....................................................................
...................................................................... 3 3.2 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ......................................................................................................
......................... 3 3.3 FACILITY MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................................................. 3
3.4 RE-CHLORINATION STATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 4 4 REGULATED DRINKING WATER QUALITY
PARAMETERS ........................................................................... 5 4.1 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING AND MONITORING ...................................................................
...................... 5 4.2 BACTERIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RESULTS ....................................................................................... 5 5 UNREGULATED DRINKING WATER
QUALITY PARAMETERS ...................................................................... 8 6 RESPONSE TO POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION ....................................................................
...................... 12 7 PUBLIC HEALTH MESSAGE FROM THE MEDICAL HEALTH OFFICER ....................................................... 12 8 CONCLUSION .............................................
............................................................................................. 12 APPENDIX A: METRO VANCOUVER COQUITLAM SOURCE WATER QUALITY APPENDIX B: SAMPLING STATION
LOCATIONS APPENDIX C: AVERAGE FREE CHLORINE RESIDUAL APPENDIX D: DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS AND pH APPENDIX E: METALS AND VINYL CHLORIDE APPENDIX F: METALS WITHOUT MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION
GUIDELINES APPENDIX G: FREE CHLORINE AND TURBIDITY CHARTS APPENDIX H: WEEKLY SAMPLE LAB RESULTS APPENDIX I: 2012 CAPITAL PROJECT LOCATIONS APPENDIX J: DRINKING WATER AND THOSE WITH
WEAKENED IMMUNE SYSTEMS
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The District of Maple Ridge (District) is a distributor of water that is supplied and treated by Metro
Vancouver from its Coquitlam Lake source. In 2011, the Municipality supplied water to approximately 69,000 people. In accordance with the requirements of the BC Drinking Water Protection
Regulation, the District sends weekly drinking water samples from 18 locations to a laboratory for analysis. Test results are communicated to the District and the Fraser Health Authority
every week and documented in this annual report. In 2011, the District met all regulatory requirements for drinking water quality set in the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation:
No samples tested positive for E. coli For each 30-day period, over 90% of samples had 0 total coliform per 100mL, and no sample had more than 10 total coliform per 100mL All water
quality objectives suggested by Health Canada were also met: Results for pH ranged from 6.8 to 7.2 pH units, as per Health Canada guidelines Turbidity was generally low in 2011,
with average turbidity values at all monitoring stations meeting the target recommended by Health Canada The running annual average total trihalomethane results ranged by location
from 22 to 35 parts per billion (ppb), less than the Health Canada guidelines of 100 ppb. The running annual average total haloacetic acid results ranged by location from 38 to 70
ppb, less than the Health Canada’s suggested 80 ppb.
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 2 2 INTRODUCTION The District operates a Municipal Water Utility under the provisions of the provincial Local Government Act,
the BC Drinking Water Protection Act, and the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation. These obligate the District to meet several requirements, including: operating the utility under
permit by the Provincial Ministry of Health Services engaging in water quality monitoring The roles and responsibilities the Province, Fraser Health Authority and Metro Vancouver/District
of Maple Ridge (Water System Owners) are shown in Figure One. Figure One: Agency Responsibilities for Water Quality The District monitors drinking water quality regularly to ensure
regulatory compliance. Moreover, the District checks a wide range of non-regulated water quality parameters to ensure residents are provided with water that is both safe to drink and
aesthetically pleasing. Results for both regulated and unregulated parameters are presented in this report.
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 3 3 BACKGROUND The District is supplied with water from the protected and undeveloped Metro Vancouver watersheds. Drinking
water is conveyed to Maple Ridge through large diameter Metro Vancouver transmission mains and nearly 400km of municipal water distribution pipes. 3.1 SOURCE WATER Metro Vancouver supplies
water to the District through a series of pipes linking Maple Ridge to the Coquitlam, Seymour and Capilano watersheds. While the Coquitlam watershed is the primary source of water for
Maple Ridge, Metro Vancouver has the ability to convey water from the Seymour watershed to Maple Ridge in the event of a service disruption at the Coquitlam source. Metro Vancouver
is currently constructing an ultra violet (UV) light disinfection plant at the Coquitlam watershed to enhance the disinfection capability of its water treatment facility. Construction
of UV disinfection plant is scheduled for completion by 2014. 3.2 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM The District distributes water to businesses, institutions and approximately 69,000 residents.
Water distribution infrastructure includes approximately 379 km of water mains, over 18,000 service connections, 7 pump stations, and 6 reservoir sites. The Municipality also operates
5 re-chlorination stations to maintain residual chlorine in the distribution system. Table 1 identifies the types of material used in the distribution system and their respective lengths.
Over 80 per cent of the District’s mains are ductile iron, most of which are cement mortar lined. The standard for all new installations is cement mortar lined ductile iron. Internal
corrosion within cement mortar lined ductile iron mains is minimal, which helps maintain good water quality. Table 1: Maple Ridge’s Distribution Pipe Lengths and Materials Material
Length (km) Asbestos Cement 54 Cast Iron 11 Ductile Iron 310 PVC 3 Steel 1 TOTAL 379 The distribution system is managed by a team of professionals within the Public Works and Development
Services Division, under the leadership of the General Manager of Public Works and Development Services. The system is also regulated by Maple Ridge’s Water Service Bylaw 6002-2001.
3.3 FACILITY MAINTENANCE Water quality is influenced by water system maintenance and improvement strategies that are implemented by the District’s Operations and Engineering Departments.
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 4 Unidirectional Flushing Unidirectional flushing is a method of cleaning sediment and material accumulation from water mains.
Unidirectional flushing involves manipulating valves and discharging water through fire hydrants or blow off points. The discharged water carries sediment and other solids with it,
thus cleaning the mains. The District cleaned 72km of mains (19% of the system) in 2011 using this method. In support of summer water conservation efforts, flushing activities for the
purpose of cleaning water mains are performed only between October and May. Reservoirs Water reservoirs are cleaned to remove sediment and algae which may serve as nutrients to microorganisms.
The District currently cleans its reservoirs on an eight year cycle. Automatic Hydrant Flushers An automatic hydrant flusher is in operation at 266 Street and 127 Avenue to improve
circulation and reduce the age of water in nearby water mains. The flusher is operated by automatic timers set to discharge at various intervals between 9:00 pm and 12:00 am. Water
Main Repairs and Improvements Water quantity, quality, and reliability can be improved through the repair and strategic replacement of water mains. Computer modeling and asset management
analyses are carried out to identify future deficiencies in the system and plan improvements. The 2012 water system capital project locations are identified in Appendix I. 3.4 RE-CHLORINATION
STATIONS Chlorine levels are continually monitored at five locations throughout the distribution system. Additional chlorine is automatically injected into the drinking water at these
locations if detected chlorine levels are too low. The re-chlorination stations are inspected daily and adjusted as necessary.
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 5 4 REGULATED DRINKING WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS Metro Vancouver and the District are responsible for monitoring water quality
in different parts of the drinking water system. Metro Vancouver is responsible for monitoring the quality of water leaving the treatment plants and within their transmission mains.
The District is responsible for monitoring water quality in distribution pipes throughout Maple Ridge. The results of Metro Vancouver’s treated water sampling results and comparisons
with Health Canada Guidelines are presented in Appendix A. The quality of water distributed within the District is monitored in accordance with requirements set out in provincial regulations.
This section describes the monitoring program and water quality results for 2011. 4.1 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING AND MONITORING Water quality is monitored for regulatory compliance on a
weekly basis at the District’s 18 sampling locations as well as at Metro Vancouver’s 3 sampling locations within Maple Ridge. Sampling site locations and codes are illustrated on a
map in Appendix B. Samples are taken weekly by District Operations Department staff and sent to the Metro Vancouver laboratory for analysis. Metro Vancouver staff analyze the samples
and communicate the results to District and Fraser Health staff for review. Responses to unacceptable results would vary between possibly issuing a boil water advisory to flushing water
mains, depending on the significance of the parameter of concern. The monitoring program provides a representative picture of drinking water quality within regional and municipal water
mains. However, it does not provide a definitive picture of drinking water quality within buildings, where water quality can change significantly due to pipe materials, standing times,
temperature, and other factors. It can be assumed that samples taken within buildings will be of different quality than those taken from municipal mains. The District is not responsible
for water quality on private property. 4.2 BACTERIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RESULTS The BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation requires the District to carry out routine sampling and
testing for Escherichia coli and total coliform bacteria. These are considered “indicator organisms,” because their presence or absence can provide a good indication of microbial water
quality. Figures Two and Three show Metro Vancouver Laboratory technicians processing a water sample and testing it for the presence of coliform bacteria. Escherichia coli Escherichia
coli (E. coli) is a type of coliform bacteria present exclusively in the feces of humans and other animals. The existence of E. coli in a water sample indicates recent fecal contamination
and the possible presence of intestinal disease-causing bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. The BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation standard for E. coli is none detectable per 100
mL. In 2011, no samples tested positive for E. coli.
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 6 Figure Two: Metro Vancouver Laboratory technician processing water sample in preparation for coliform bacteria check Figure
Three: Metro Vancouver Laboratory technician checking water sample for coliform bacteria Total Coliform The total coliform group of bacteria is composed of various genera with similar
characteristics. The natural niches for members of this group range from being fecal-specific, such as E. coli, to being widely distributed in the water, soil, and vegetation. The BC
Drinking Water Protection Regulation standards for total coliform are described in Table 2. Table 2: BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation Standards for Total Coliform Occurrence
Standard 1 sample in a 30 day period No detectable total coliform per 100mL More than 1 sample in a 30 day period At least 90% of samples have 0 total coliform per 100mL and no sample
has more than 10 total coliform per 100mL For each 30 day period in 2011, over 90% of samples had 0 total coliform per 100mL, as per the regulations. No sample had more than 10 total
coliform per 100mL. However, total coliforms were detected in one sample in 2011. The District’s response to the detection of coliforms is to flush the water main at the test location.
Total coliform data for each sample in 2011 is provided in Appendix H. Table 3 lists the annual number samples found to contain total coliform between 2006 and 2011.
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 7 Table 3: Total Coliform Results by Year Year Number of Samples with Total Coliform 2011 1 2010 3 2009 1 2008 0 2007 5 2006
0 Frequency of Monitoring Samples The monitoring frequency for the detection of E. coli and total coliforms is stipulated by the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation. Current requirements
are identified in Table 4. With a total of 18 weekly sampling sites at various points in the District’s water distribution system, the average number of monthly samples (72) exceeds
with the stipulated value of 69 (based on a directly serviced population of approximately 69,000); Metro Vancouver samples within the District provide an additional point of reference.
As the District’s population grows, additional sampling sites will be added. Table 4: Monitoring frequency for the detection of E. coli and total coliforms Population Served Target
No. of Samples per Month Less than 5,000 4 5,000 to 90,000 1 per 1,000 of population More than 90,000 90 plus 1 per 10,000 of population in excess of 90,000
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 8 5 UNREGULATED DRINKING WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS In monitoring unregulated drinking water quality parameters, the District
exceeds the Water Quality Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the GVRD and Member Municipalities. This section reports on the District’s non-regulatory monitoring. Heterotrophic Plate
Count Samples are tested for the presence of heterotrophic bacteria to detect possible changes such as the bacterial quality of the finished water entering the distribution system,
temperature, residence time (i.e., stagnation), the presence or absence of a disinfectant residual, and the availability of nutrients for growth. Health Canada does not suggest a maximum
acceptable concentration for heterotrophs. Instead, it recommends that increases in heterotrophic plate count (HPC) concentrations above baseline levels be considered undesirable. Table
5 shows the annual number of samples with HPC’s over 500 CFU/mL between 2006 and 2011. In response to HPC count’s at or above this level, the District will re-test and flush water mains.
HPC data for each sample taken in 2011 is provided in Appendix H. Table 5: HPC Results by Year Year Number of Samples with HPC > 500 CFU/mL 2011 1 2010 1 2009 1 2008 4 2007 1 2006 7
Free Chlorine Health Canada’s Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality recommends a minimum free chlorine residual of 0.2 mg/L to limit the growth of biofilm, provide an indication
of distribution system water quality, and to guard against microbiological contamination. Table 6 and Appendix C show that the average free chlorine residual at all sampling stations
exceeded 0.2 mg/L in 2011. Detailed free chlorine residual data charted in Appendix G and tabulated in Appendix H indicates that several stations occasionally experienced free chlorine
residuals of less than 0.2 mg/L. Sampling stations having occasional low chlorine concentrations had no indication of microbiological impairment. Variations in the concentration of
free chlorine residual may be associated with various issues such as chemical reactions between the chlorine and organic and inorganic chemicals. Residual chlorine concentrations are
also affected by water age, which fluctuates daily as local reservoirs fill and drain.
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 9 Disinfection Byproducts Disinfection byproducts such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) can form when
the chlorine used to disinfect drinking water reacts with naturally occurring organic matter. Health Canada considers certain HAA’s and THMS’s to be probably carcinogenic to humans.
In 2011, 16 samples were analyzed for trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids (see Appendix D). The running annual average THM results ranged by location from 22 to 35 parts per billion
(ppb), less than the Health Canada guidelines of 100 ppb. The running annual average total HAA results ranged by location from 38 to 70 ppb, less than the Health Canada’s suggested
80 ppb. Bromodichloromethane (a particular type of THM for which Health Canada publishes a standard) concentrations were all less than the Health Canada guideline of 16 ppb. Turbidity
Turbidity, measured in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) is a measure of water clarity. There is no safe/unsafe level of turbidity, but Health Canada guidelines recommend that turbidity
average around 1.0 NTU and a not exceed 5.0 NTU for more than 2 days in a 12-month period. Turbidity levels from the Metro Vancouver source waters of Capilano, Seymour and Coquitlam
are reported in the Vancouver Sun and on the Metro Vancouver web site on a daily basis. Turbidity was generally low in 2011, with average turbidity values below 1 NTU at all sample
stations (Table 6). Detailed Turbidity data for 2011 is charted in Appendix G and tabulated in Appendix H. Variations in turbidity noted in the table may be associated with turbidity
in the source water or occasionally local system events such as flushing to clean water mains. pH pH is a measure of the acid-base equilibrium of water. pH is of concern in a water
distribution system because at low values water becomes corrosive while at high values chlorine disinfection is less efficient. Health Canada indicates that an acceptable pH range for
drinking water is 6.5 -8.5 pH units. Eight of the 940 distribution system samples were tested for pH. Test results ranged of 6.8 to 7.2 pH Units (see Appendix D). Metals The District
tested samples at three monitoring sites for concentrations of various metals. Test results are shown in Appendix E, along with maximum concentration limits suggested by Health Canada
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). USEPA values are referenced only where Health Canada does not recommend a limit. As shown in Appendix E, all measured metal concentrations
were below the limits recommended by Health Canada and the USEPA. Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA suggest drinking water quality guidelines for calcium, cobalt, magnesium, molybdenum,
nickel or potassium. Additional information related to concentrations of these metals is provided in Appendix F.
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 10 Table 6: Maple Ridge Sites -2011 Average Physical Results by Site Site Average Free Chlorine mg/L Average Turbidity NTU
GV-071 0.85 0.34 GV-072 0.81 0.34 GV-098 0.61 0.33 MPR-431 0.91 0.34 MPR-432 0.87 0.32 MPR-433 0.85 0.34 MPR-434 0.40 0.34 MPR-435 0.34 0.28 MPR-436 0.33 0.26 MPR-437 0.62 0.29 MPR-438
0.37 0.29 MPR-439 0.47 0.26 MPR-440 0.92 0.32 MPR-441 0.76 0.32 MPR-442 0.33 0.32 MPR-443 0.59 0.34 MPR-444 0.41 0.31 MPR-445 0.33 0.25 MPR-446 0.68 0.32 MPR-447 0.35 0.30 MPR-448 0.57
0.29 Temperature Health Canada sets an aesthetic objective of 15 degrees Celsius for drinking water. Water temperatures exceeding this objective can result in consumer complaints and
the growth of nuisance organisms that could lead to unpleasant tastes and odours. Figure Four shows that the average monthly drinking water temperature in Maple Ridge remained below
the aesthetic objective of 15 degrees Celsius throughout the year. Detailed temperature information is provided in Appendix H.
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 11 Figure Four: Average Monthly Drinking Water Temperature Vinyl Chloride The concentration of vinyl chloride was tested in
six samples during 2011. As indicated in Appendix E, all results were non-detectable (less than 0.5 µg/L), less than the Health Canada Guideline of 2 µg/L. 02468 10 12 14 Jan Feb Mar
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Temperature (Degrees Celsius) Average Monthly Drinking Water Temperature
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 12 6 RESPONSE TO POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION In the event that contaminants are detected in the water distribution system, a series
of protocols would be carried out to communicate the event to District and Fraser Health Authority staff. The District and Fraser Health would then work together to confirm the incident,
determine the nature of the risk to public health and issue public notices as required. Depending on the level of risk, a water quality advisory, boil water notice, or do-not-use water
notice could be issued. Public notices would be communicated through various media. The District’s contamination response plan is embedded in emergency planning documents. 7 PUBLIC
HEALTH MESSAGE FROM THE MEDICAL HEALTH OFFICER Fraser Health’s Medical Health Officer has requested that a fact sheet entitled “Drinking Water and Those with Weakened Immune Systems”
be included in this report. The fact sheet is presented in Appendix J. Additionally, the Medical Health Officer has requested that the following message be included in this report:
Water from taps that are not used for several hours is good for washing or watering plants but not for drinking or cooking, as it may contain elevated levels of lead or copper. Run
the water for at least one minute, or until the water is cold before using it for drinking or cooking. For the same reason never use water from hot taps for drinking or cooking. 8 CONCLUSION
The District monitored drinking water quality in 2011 in accordance with provincial regulations. 940 drinking water samples were obtained from the municipal water distribution system
at 18 sites throughout the District. Metro Vancouver Laboratory testing indicated that all samples met standards detailed in the provincial Drinking Water Protection Regulation. The
samples also met Health Canada’s Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality.
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 13 APPENDIX A: METRO VANCOUVER COQUITLAM SOURCE WATER QUALITY
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 14
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 15 APPENDIX B: SAMPLING STATION LOCATIONS
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 16
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 17 APPENDIX C: AVERAGE FREE CHLORINE RESIDUAL
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 18
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 19 APPENDIX D: DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS AND pH
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 20 DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS AND pH Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Chlorodibromomethane Chloroform Total Trihalomethanes Running
Average (Last 4 Quarters) Dibromoacetic Acid Dichloroacetic Acid Monobromoacetic Acid Monochloroacetic Acid Trichloroacetic Acid Total Haloacet ic Acid Running Average (Last 4 Quarters)
Canadian Guideline Limits 16 100 80 6.5-8.5 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 18/05/2010 <1 <1 <1 28 28 <0.5 20 <1 3 27 50 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 14/09/2010 <1 <1 <1 33 33
<0.5 26 <1 <2 73 99 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 23/11/2010 <1 <1 <1 48 48 <0.5 26 <1 3 51 80 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 15/02/2011 <1 <1 <1 25 25 34 <0.5 12 <1 <2 23 36
66 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 10/05/2011 <1 <1 <1 20 20.3 32 <0.5 13 <1 4 20 36.4 63 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 13/09/2011 <1 <1 <1 21 20.8 29 <0.5 8 <1 11 9 27.1 45 MPR-434
102 Ave. East of 241A St. 15/11/2011 <1 <1 <1 37 37.2 26 <0.5 16 <1 12 25 53.4 38 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 18/05/2010 <1 <1 <1 34 34 <0.5 16 <1 2 21 39 MPR-435 240 St.
South of Abernethy Way 14/09/2010 1 <1 <1 35 36 <0.5 18 1 3 35 58 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 23/11/2010 <1 <1 <1 40 40 <0.5 21 <1 8 59 88 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy
Way 15/02/2011 <1 <1 <1 25 25 34 <0.5 11 <1 <2 19 30 54 7.2 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 10/05/2011 <1 <1 <1 29 29 33 <0.5 15 <1 4 27 46.5 56 6.8 MPR-435 240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 13/09/2011 <1 <1 <1 24 24.2 30 <0.5 10 <1 10 8 27.7 48 7.1 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 15/11/2011 <1 <1 <1 39 38.6 29 <0.5 18 <1 10 25 53.2 39 7.0 MPR-438 125
Ave. West off 256 St. 18/05/2010 <1 <1 <1 33 33 <0.5 16 <1 7 20 43 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 14/09/2010 <1 <1 <1 28 28 <0.5 13 <1 5 21 38 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 23/11/2010
<1 <1 <1 47 47 <0.5 22 <1 18 71 111 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 15/02/2011 <1 <1 <1 28 28 34 <0.5 11 <1 2 26 39 58 7.1 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 10/05/2011 <1 <1 <1 33
33.4 34 <0.5 20 <1 5 67 92.4 70 7.0 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 13/09/2011 <1 <1 <1 30 30.1 35 <0.5 <1 <1 8 <0.5 8.5 63 7.2 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 15/11/2011 <1 <1
<1 36 36.1 32 <0.5 10 <1 2 16 28.2 42 7.0 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 18/05/2010 <1 <1 <1 28 28 <0.5 13 <1 5 12 29 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 14/09/2010 <1 <1 <1 23 23 <0.5 17 <1 12 16
45 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 23/11/2010 <1 <1 <1 31 31 <0.5 22 <1 22 32 76 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 15/02/2011 <1 <1 <1 16 16 25 <0.5 14 <1 10 12 36 47 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 10/05/2011
<1 <1 <1 22 21.5 23 <0.5 17 <1 18 16 51 52 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 13/09/2011 <1 <1 <1 19 19.4 22 <0.5 <1 <1 10 <0.5 10.5 43 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 15/11/2011 <1 <1 <1 33 33.4
23 <0.5 25 <1 27 16 68 41 Sample Date Sampled THM (ppb) HAA (ppb) pH units
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 21 APPENDIX E: METALS AND VINYL CHLORIDE
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 22 Metal Concentrations Sample Name Sample Reported Name Date Sampled Aluminum Total µg/L Ant imony Total µg/L Arsenic Total
µg/L Barium Total µg/L Cadmium Total µg/L Calcium Total µg/L Chromium Total µg/L Cobalt Total µg/L Copper Total µg/L Iron Total µg/L Lead Total µg/L Magnesium Total µg/L Manganese Total
µg/L Mercury Total µg/L Molybdenum Total µg/L Nickel Total µg/L Potassium Total µg/L Selenium Total µg/L Silver Total µg/L Sodium Total µg/L Zinc Total µg/L none 6 10 1000 5 none 50
none 1000 300 10 none 50 1 none none none 10 none 200,000 5000 50-200 none none none none none none 100 A H H H H H A A H A H H A A A MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 7-Jun-11 133
<0.5 <0.5 2.4 <0.2 905 0.14 <0.5 38.1 121 <0.5 112 15.5 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 114 <0.5 <0.5 5340 2 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 8-Nov-11 81 <0.5 <0.5 2.4 <0.2 883 0.05 <0.5 39.1 63
<0.5 108 1.8 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 112 <0.5 <0.5 5280 <3 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 7-Jun-11 89 <0.5 <0.5 2.5 <0.2 1080 0.16 <0.5 22.8 77 <0.5 113 9.2 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 123 <0.5
<0.5 5580 1 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 8-Nov-11 80 <0.5 <0.5 2.6 <0.2 1040 <0.05 <0.5 13 61 <0.5 109 1.3 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 113 <0.5 <0.5 5300 <3 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow
Place 7-Jun-11 91 <0.5 <0.5 3.8 <0.2 1610 0.09 <0.5 7.1 106 0.5 103 9.9 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 125 <0.5 <0.5 9250 5.2 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 8-Nov-11 81 <0.5 <0.5 3.6 <0.2 1460
0.14 <0.5 3.8 74 <0.5 100 1.9 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 121 <0.5 <0.5 9740 6.1 Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality USEPA Nat ional Secondary Drinking Water Regulat ions Reason Guideline
Established -Health (H) or Aesthet ic (A)
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 23 Vinyl Chloride Concentrations Sample Name Locat ion Descript ion Date Sampled Vinyl Chloride µg/L 2 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @201B St. 7-Jun-11 <0.5 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 1-Nov-11 <0.5 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 7-Jun-11 <0.5 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 1-Nov-11 <0.5
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 7-Jun-11 <0.5 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 1-Nov-11 <0.5 Maximum Acceptable Concent rat ion, as per Health Canada
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 24 APPENDIX F: METALS WITHOUT MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION GUIDELINES Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA suggest maximum concentration
guidelines for calcium, cobalt, magnesium, molybdenum, nickel or potassium in drinking water. Additional information related to these metals is provided below. Calcium Health Canada
reports “there is no evidence of adverse health effects specifically attributable to calcium in drinking water. Insufficient data are available to set a specific value for an aesthetic
objective for calcium in drinking water. A guideline for calcium has therefore not been specified….Measurements of water samples collected from 71 municipalities across Canada showed
that the mean calcium concentrations were…21,400 (1,100 to 112,800) µg/L for distributed water.”1 The maximum concentration of calcium detected in Maple Ridge drinking water samples
was 1,610 µg/L. Cobalt Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for cobalt. However, as a point of reference one might consider that the BC Ministry
of Environment recommends that the maximum concentration of total cobalt not exceed 110 µg/L to “protect aquatic life in the freshwater environment from acute effects of cobalt.”2 Cobalt
levels were non-detectable (less than 0. 5 µg/L) in all Maple Ridge drinking water samples. Magnesium Health Canada reports “there is no evidence of adverse health effects specifically
attributable to magnesium in drinking water. A guideline for magnesium has therefore not been specified. Two national surveys of drinking water supplies, encompassing 115 municipalities
across Canada, were conducted in 1976 and 1977; magnesium concentrations in distributed water ranged from 200 to 59,500 µg/L.”3 The maximum concentration of magnesium detected in Maple
Ridge drinking water samples was 113 µg/L. Molybdenum Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for Molybdenum. However, as a point of reference
one might consider that The BC Ministry of Environment recommends a maximum of 50 µg/L for various water uses such as irrigation and drinking water for livestock.4 Molybdenum levels
were non-detectable (less than 0.5 µg/L) in all Maple Ridge drinking water samples. 1 Guidelines For Canadian Drinking Water Quality -Supporting Documents – Calcium, Health Canada (1978,
updated 1987) 2 Ambient Water Quality Guidelines for Cobalt Overview Report, BC Ministry of Environment (2004) 3 Guidelines For Canadian Drinking Water Quality -Supporting Documents
– Magnesium, Health Canada (1978, updated 1987) 4 Water Quality Criteria for Molybdenum Overview Report, BC Ministry of Environment (1986)
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 25 Nickel Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for nickel. However, as a point of
reference one might consider that the BC Ministry of Environment recommends a maximum concentration of 8.3 µg/L nickel for marine aquatic life.5 Nickel levels were non-detectable (less
than 0.5 µg/L) in all Maple Ridge drinking water samples. Potassium Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for potassium. However, as a point
of reference one might consider that the BC Ministry of Environment recommends a maximum concentration of 373,000 µg/L potassium for freshwater aquatic life.6 The maximum concentration
of magnesium detected in Maple Ridge drinking water samples was 125 µg/L. 5 A Compendium of Working Water Quality Guidelines for British Columbia, BC Ministry of Environment (2008)
6 A Compendium of Working Water Quality Guidelines for British Columbia, BC Ministry of Environment (2008)
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 26 APPENDIX G: FREE CHLORINE AND TURBIDITY CHARTS
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 27 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity
Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-431 Free Chlorine Turbidity 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free
Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-432 Free Chlorine Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 28 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity
Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-433 Free Chlorine Turbidity 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-434 Free Chlorine Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 29 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity
Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-435 Free Chlorine Turbidity 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L
Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-436 Free Chlorine Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 30 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity Units
2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-437 Free Chlorine Turbidity 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L
Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-438 Free Chlorine Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 31 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity Units
2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-439 Free Chlorine Turbidity 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free
Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-440 Free Chlorine Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 32 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity Units
2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-441 Free Chlorine Turbidity 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric
Turbidity Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-442 Free Chlorine Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 33 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity
Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-443 Free Chlorine Turbidity 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-444 Free Chlorine Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 34 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric
Turbidity Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-445 Free Chlorine Turbidity 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-446 Free Chlorine Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 35 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity Units
2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-447 Free Chlorine Turbidity 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine
/Nephelometric Turbidity Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR MPR-448 Free Chlorine Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 36 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric Turbidity
Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MV MV-071 Free Chlorine Turbidity 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine
/Nephelometric Turbidity Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MV MV-072 Free Chlorine Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 37 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec mg/L Free Chlorine /Nephelometric
Turbidity Units 2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MV MV-098 Free Chlorine Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 38 APPENDIX H: WEEKLY SAMPLE LAB RESULTS
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 39 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU GV-071 Haney 5-Jan-11 0.61 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-071 Haney 6-Jan-11 0.84 <1 12 <1 0.3 GV-071 Haney 13-Jan-11 0.76 <1 2 <1 0.34 GV-071 Haney 19-Jan-11 0.49 <1 <2 <1 0.82 GV-071
Haney 20-Jan-11 1.2 <1 <2 <1 0.5 GV-071 Haney 26-Jan-11 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV-071 Haney 27-Jan-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.78 GV-071 Haney 3-Feb-11 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-071 Haney 10-Feb-11 0.85
<1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-071 Haney 17-Feb-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV-071 Haney 24-Feb-11 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV-071 Haney 28-Feb-11 0.99 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV-071 Haney 2-Mar-11 0.95 <1 <2 <1 0.38 GV-071
Haney 3-Mar-11 0.77 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-071 Haney 9-Mar-11 0.8 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV-071 Haney 10-Mar-11 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV-071 Haney 17-Mar-11 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.62 GV-071 Haney 23-Mar-11 0.82
<1 <2 <1 0.28 GV-071 Haney 24-Mar-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-071 Haney 28-Mar-11 0.86 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-071 Haney 30-Mar-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV-071 Haney 31-Mar-11 0.91 <1 <2 <1 0.6
GV-071 Haney 4-Apr-11 0.67 <1 <2 <1 0.42 GV-071 Haney 6-Apr-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV-071 Haney 7-Apr-11 0.64 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV-071 Haney 12-Apr-11 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.41 GV-071 Haney 15-Apr-11
0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.37 GV-071 Haney 21-Apr-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV-071 Haney 28-Apr-11 0.95 <1 <2 <1 0.11 GV-071 Haney 3-May-11 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV-071 Haney 5-May-11 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-071 Haney 10-May-11 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.38 GV-071 Haney 12-May-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV-071 Haney 19-May-11 0.71 <1 <2 <1 0.45 GV-071 Haney 26-May-11 0.52 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-071 Haney
1-Jun-11 0.72 <1 2 <1 0.29 GV-071 Haney 9-Jun-11 0.93 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV-071 Haney 14-Jun-11 0.8 <1 <2 <1 0.3
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 40 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU GV-071 Haney 16-Jun-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-071 Haney 23-Jun-11 0.91 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV-071 Haney 27-Jun-11 0.72 <1 <2 <1 0.24 GV-071 Haney 30-Jun-11 0.86 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-071 Haney 7-Jul-11 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV-071 Haney 14-Jul-11 0.75 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-071 Haney 21-Jul-11 1 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV-071 Haney 26-Jul-11 0.97 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV-071 Haney 28-Jul-11
0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV-071 Haney 4-Aug-11 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV-071 Haney 11-Aug-11 0.75 <1 26 <1 0.38 GV-071 Haney 18-Aug-11 0.87 <1 22 <1 0.22 GV-071 Haney 19-Aug-11 0.86 <1 2 <1 0.27
GV-071 Haney 25-Aug-11 0.76 <1 2 <1 0.32 GV-071 Haney 1-Sep-11 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.25 GV-071 Haney 9-Sep-11 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.19 GV-071 Haney 15-Sep-11 0.72 <1 <2 <1 0.22 GV-071 Haney 19-Sep-11
0.77 <1 <2 <1 0.23 GV-071 Haney 22-Sep-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV-071 Haney 26-Sep-11 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.25 GV-071 Haney 29-Sep-11 0.64 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV-071 Haney 4-Oct-11 0.98 <1 <2 <1
0.33 GV-071 Haney 6-Oct-11 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.38 GV-071 Haney 12-Oct-11 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV-071 Haney 13-Oct-11 1.3 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV-071 Haney 17-Oct-11 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.37 GV-071 Haney
24-Oct-11 1.1 <1 2 <1 0.29 GV-071 Haney 27-Oct-11 0.94 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-071 Haney 3-Nov-11 0.92 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV-071 Haney 9-Nov-11 0.75 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-071 Haney 10-Nov-11 0.89 <1
<2 <1 0.26 GV-071 Haney 16-Nov-11 1.3 <1 2 <1 0.3 GV-071 Haney 24-Nov-11 0.98 <1 <2 <1 0.63 GV-071 Haney 30-Nov-11 0.96 <1 4 <1 0.55 GV-071 Haney 7-Dec-11 1.2 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV-071 Haney
8-Dec-11 1.1 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV-071 Haney 12-Dec-11 0.54 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV-071 Haney 15-Dec-11 0.99 <1 <2 <1 0.25
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 41 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU GV-071 Haney 16-Dec-11 0.98 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV-071 Haney 19-Dec-11 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV-071 Haney 30-Dec-11 0.78 <1 NA <1 0.43 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 5-Jan-11
0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 6-Jan-11 0.66 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 13-Jan-11 0.66 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 19-Jan-11
0.76 <1 <2 <1 0.8 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 26-Jan-11 0.75 <1 2 <1 0.36 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 31-Jan-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.37 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 2-Feb-11 0.57
<1 <2 <1 0.31 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 8-Feb-11 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.37 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 9-Feb-11 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 15-Feb-11 0.87
<1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 17-Feb-11 0.76 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 22-Feb-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 23-Feb-11 0.84
<1 <2 <1 0.35 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 28-Feb-11 1.1 <1 <2 <1 0.4 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 2-Mar-11 0.52 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 2-Mar-11 1.1 <1
2 <1 0.29 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 7-Mar-11 0.51 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 11-Mar-11 0.62 <1 2 <1 0.36 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 17-Mar-11 0.79 <1 <2
<1 0.61 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 22-Mar-11 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.32
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 42 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 25-Mar-11 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 28-Mar-11 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 31-Mar-11 1.1
<1 <2 <1 0.91 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 4-Apr-11 0.77 <1 <2 <1 0.47 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 5-Apr-11 0.64 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 11-Apr-11 0.63
<1 <2 <1 0.37 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 13-Apr-11 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.45 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 15-Apr-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 21-Apr-11 0.78
<1 <2 <1 0.33 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 26-Apr-11 0.64 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 2-May-11 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 3-May-11 0.75
<1 <2 <1 0.3 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 5-May-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 10-May-11 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.47 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 11-May-11 0.9 <1
<2 <1 0.29 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 16-May-11 0.64 <1 18 2 0.34 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 17-May-11 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 18-May-11 0.73 <1
2 <1 0.38 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 19-May-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 26-May-11 0.62 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 1-Jun-11 0.71 <1
2 <1 0.38 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 8-Jun-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.37
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 43 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 9-Jun-11 0.86 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 14-Jun-11 0.61 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 16-Jun-11 0.93
<1 <2 <1 0.47 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 23-Jun-11 0.84 <1 18 <1 0.26 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 27-Jun-11 0.69 <1 2 <1 0.3 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 28-Jun-11 0.87
<1 <2 <1 0.24 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 30-Jun-11 0.73 <1 6 <1 0.26 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 7-Jul-11 0.89 <1 6 <1 0.33 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 14-Jul-11 0.64 <1
<2 <1 0.31 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 18-Jul-11 1.1 <1 <2 <1 0.23 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 19-Jul-11 0.94 <1 2 <1 0.28 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 22-Jul-11 0.91 <1
<2 <1 0.3 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 26-Jul-11 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 27-Jul-11 0.67 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 28-Jul-11 0.81 <1
<2 <1 0.36 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 29-Jul-11 0.82 <1 6 <1 0.33 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 4-Aug-11 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 11-Aug-11 0.77 <1
<2 <1 0.39 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 17-Aug-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 25-Aug-11 0.61 <1 2 <1 0.31 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 1-Sep-11 0.55 <1
<2 <1 0.26 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 8-Sep-11 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.19
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 44 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 12-Sep-11 1 <1 6 <1 0.32 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 16-Sep-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.25 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 19-Sep-11 0.79 <1
2 <1 0.22 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 20-Sep-11 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.25 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 23-Sep-11 0.71 <1 2 <1 0.26 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 26-Sep-11 0.73 <1
<2 <1 0.3 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 27-Sep-11 0.67 <1 2 <1 0.26 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 29-Sep-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 3-Oct-11 0.87 <1 8
<1 0.38 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 4-Oct-11 0.81 <1 4 <1 0.32 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 5-Oct-11 0.61 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 12-Oct-11 0.7 <1 10 <1
0.4 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 13-Oct-11 1 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 14-Oct-11 0.97 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 17-Oct-11 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 24-Oct-11 1 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 25-Oct-11 0.97 <1 2 <1 0.31 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 27-Oct-11 1.1 <1 4 <1 0.36 GV-072
Maple Ridge Pump Station 3-Nov-11 0.97 <1 2 <1 0.3 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 9-Nov-11 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 10-Nov-11 1 <1 2 <1 0.27 GV-072 Maple
Ridge Pump Station 16-Nov-11 1 <1 2 <1 0.28
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 45 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 24-Nov-11 0.8 <1 <2 <1 0.43 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 30-Nov-11 0.98 <1 <2 <1 0.54 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 5-Dec-11 0.87
<1 <2 <1 0.39 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 6-Dec-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 7-Dec-11 0.88 <1 2 <1 0.28 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 9-Dec-11 0.68 <1
<2 <1 0.28 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 12-Dec-11 0.94 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 14-Dec-11 0.74 <1 [Spread er colonies .] NA <1 0.29 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station
19-Dec-11 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 29-Dec-11 0.71 <1 NA <1 0.46 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 5-Jan-11 0.67 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main
6-Jan-11 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 13-Jan-11 0.53 <1 <2 <1 0.41 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 19-Jan-11 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.83 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main
26-Jan-11 0.39 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 27-Jan-11 0.34 <1 <2 <1 0.37 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 3-Feb-11 0.36 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main
10-Feb-11 0.61 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 16-Feb-11 0.49 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 17-Feb-11 0.49 <1 <2 <1 0.4 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main
24-Feb-11 0.39 <1 <2 <1 0.39
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 46 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 28-Feb-11 0.7 <1 2 <1 0.29 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 2-Mar-11 0.57 <1 <2 <1 0.37 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 3-Mar-11 0.82 <1
<2 <1 0.28 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 10-Mar-11 0.6 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 17-Mar-11 0.33 <1 <2 <1 0.41 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 23-Mar-11 0.69 <1
<2 <1 0.27 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 24-Mar-11 0.67 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 28-Mar-11 0.57 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 30-Mar-11 0.5 <1
<2 <1 0.34 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 31-Mar-11 0.46 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 4-Apr-11 0.52 <1 <2 <1 0.49 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 6-Apr-11 0.75 <1 <2
<1 0.43 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 12-Apr-11 0.44 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 15-Apr-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 21-Apr-11 0.68 <1 <2
<1 0.42 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 28-Apr-11 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 3-May-11 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 5-May-11 0.66 <1 <2 <1
0.31 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 10-May-11 0.57 <1 <2 <1 0.38 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 12-May-11 0.62 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 19-May-11 0.65 <1 2 <1
0.53 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 26-May-11 0.31 <1 22 <1 0.4
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 47 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 1-Jun-11 0.27 <1 8 <1 0.33 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 9-Jun-11 0.75 <1 2 <1 0.32 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 14-Jun-11 0.7 <1
<2 <1 0.27 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 16-Jun-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 23-Jun-11 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 27-Jun-11 0.43 <1
4 <1 0.34 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 30-Jun-11 0.61 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 7-Jul-11 0.38 <1 20 <1 0.29 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 14-Jul-11 0.68 <1
<2 <1 0.24 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 21-Jul-11 0.41 <1 6 <1 0.25 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 26-Jul-11 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 28-Jul-11 0.64 <1
<2 <1 0.29 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 4-Aug-11 0.67 <1 64 <1 0.31 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 11-Aug-11 0.35 <1 44 <1 0.27 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 18-Aug-11 0.42 <1
<2 <1 0.29 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 25-Aug-11 0.56 <1 36 <1 0.32 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 1-Sep-11 0.46 <1 <2 <1 0.24 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 9-Sep-11 0.42 <1
10 <1 0.21 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 14-Sep-11 0.47 <1 38 <1 0.2 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 19-Sep-11 0.62 <1 14 <1 0.24 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 22-Sep-11 0.73 <1
12 <1 0.25 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 26-Sep-11 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.21
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 48 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 29-Sep-11 0.65 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 4-Oct-11 0.74 <1 400 <1 0.31 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 6-Oct-11 0.82
<1 <2 <1 0.34 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 13-Oct-11 0.67 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 17-Oct-11 0.79 <1 2 <1 0.26 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 24-Oct-11 0.54
<1 <2 <1 0.27 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 27-Oct-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 3-Nov-11 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 9-Nov-11 0.56 <1
<2 <1 0.32 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 10-Nov-11 0.72 <1 <2 <1 0.24 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 16-Nov-11 0.63 <1 4 <1 0.27 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 24-Nov-11 0.53 <1
<2 <1 0.3 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 30-Nov-11 0.64 <1 <2 <1 0.58 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 2-Dec-11 0.53 <1 <2 <1 0.48 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 7-Dec-11 0.55 <1 <2
<1 0.29 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 8-Dec-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.46 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 15-Dec-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 16-Dec-11 0.76 <1 <2
<1 0.26 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 19-Dec-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.39 GV-098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 30-Dec-11 0.87 <1 NA <1 0.41 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 4-Jan-11 0.62 <1
<2 5 <1 0.35 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 11-Jan-11 0.89 <1 <2 5 <1 0.4
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 49 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 18-Jan-11 0.78 <1 <2 4 <1 0.94 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 25-Jan-11 0.87 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St.
1-Feb-11 0.97 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 8-Feb-11 0.98 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 15-Feb-11 0.91 <1 <2 5 <1 0.38 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @201B St. 22-Feb-11 0.83 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 1-Mar-11 0.93 <1 30 3 <1 0.39 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 8-Mar-11 0.89 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32 MPR-431
Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 15-Mar-11 0.75 <1 <2 4 <1 0.56 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 22-Mar-11 0.9 <1 <2 5 <1 0.38 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 23-Mar-11 0.63 <1 <2
5 <1 0.28 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 29-Mar-11 0.78 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 5-Apr-11 0.78 <1 <2 5 <1 0.39 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 12-Apr-11
0.84 <1 <2 5 <1 0.45 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 19-Apr-11 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 26-Apr-11 0.93 <1 <2 6 <1 0.25 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B
St. 3-May-11 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 10-May-11 0.99 <1 <2 9 <1 0.42 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 17-May-11 0.8 <1 <2 6 <1 0.37 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @201B St. 24-May-11 0.88 <1 2 7 <1 0.42 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 31-May-11 0.75 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 7-Jun-11 0.92 <1 2 10 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 50 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 14-Jun-11 0.89 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 21-Jun-11 0.9 <1 4 10 <1 0.33 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St.
28-Jun-11 0.8 <1 2 12 <1 0.22 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 5-Jul-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.37 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 12-Jul-11 0.83 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @201B St. 19-Jul-11 0.99 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 26-Jul-11 0.91 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 3-Aug-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.26 MPR-431
Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 9-Aug-11 1.1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 16-Aug-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 23-Aug-11 0.84 <1 <2 10
<1 0.34 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 30-Aug-11 0.84 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 6-Sep-11 0.8 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 13-Sep-11
0.83 <1 2 10 <1 0.23 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 20-Sep-11 0.87 <1 <2 12 <1 0.06 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 27-Sep-11 1.1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.32 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd.
@201B St. 4-Oct-11 0.93 <1 2 11 <1 0.43 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 11-Oct-11 0.93 <1 2 12 <1 0.35 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 18-Oct-11 1.1 <1 <2 11 <1 0.24 MPR-431
Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 25-Oct-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.33 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 1-Nov-11 1 <1 <2 9 <1 0.26 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 8-Nov-11 0.88 <1 4 9 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 51 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 15-Nov-11 0.92 <1 2 9 <1 0.3 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 22-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St.
29-Nov-11 1.2 <1 <2 5 <1 0.65 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 6-Dec-11 1.2 <1 2 5 <1 0.34 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 13-Dec-11 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd.
@201B St. 20-Dec-11 1 <1 2 6 <1 0.29 MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @201B St. 28-Dec-11 0.81 <1 NA 5 <1 0.32 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 4-Jan-11 0.75 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR-432 224 St. @122
Ave. 11-Jan-11 0.87 <1 <2 3 <1 0.39 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 18-Jan-11 0.94 <1 <2 4 <1 0.77 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 25-Jan-11 0.85 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 1-Feb-11
0.77 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 8-Feb-11 0.76 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 15-Feb-11 0.88 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 22-Feb-11 0.86 <1 <2
5 <1 0.31 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 1-Mar-11 0.9 <1 <2 2 <1 0.31 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 8-Mar-11 0.84 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 15-Mar-11 0.77 <1 <2 3 <1 0.49 MPR-432
224 St. @122 Ave. 22-Mar-11 0.76 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 23-Mar-11 0.91 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 29-Mar-11 0.82 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR-432 224 St. @122
Ave. 5-Apr-11 0.93 <1 <2 5 <1 0.45
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 52 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 12-Apr-11 0.88 <1 <2 5 <1 0.43 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 19-Apr-11 0.87 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 26-Apr-11 0.77 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 3-May-11 0.94 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 10-May-11 0.8 <1 <2 9 <1 0.36 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 17-May-11 0.78 <1 <2 5 <1 0.38 MPR-432 224
St. @122 Ave. 24-May-11 0.79 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 31-May-11 0.76 <1 <2 10 <1 0.37 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 7-Jun-11 0.81 <1 <2 11 <1 0.37 MPR-432 224 St. @122
Ave. 14-Jun-11 0.86 <1 2 7 <1 0.25 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 21-Jun-11 0.87 <1 4 9 <1 0.26 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 28-Jun-11 0.88 <1 <2 9 <1 0.23 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 5-Jul-11
0.86 <1 <2 9 <1 0.27 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 12-Jul-11 0.77 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 19-Jul-11 0.92 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 26-Jul-11 0.93 <1
<2 9 <1 0.28 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 3-Aug-11 0.96 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 9-Aug-11 0.89 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 16-Aug-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 23-Aug-11 0.71 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 30-Aug-11 0.81 <1 <2 11 <1 0.22 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 6-Sep-11 0.78 <1 2 10 <1 0.34
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 53 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 13-Sep-11 0.87 <1 <2 10 <1 0.22 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 20-Sep-11 0.82 <1 <2 11 <1 0.06 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 27-Sep-11 1 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26
MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 4-Oct-11 0.84 <1 <2 10 <1 0.37 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 11-Oct-11 0.8 <1 <2 11 <1 0.33 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 18-Oct-11 1.2 <1 <2 9 <1 0.32 MPR-432 224
St. @122 Ave. 25-Oct-11 0.95 <1 <2 9 <1 0.34 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 1-Nov-11 1 <1 <2 9 <1 0.29 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 8-Nov-11 0.94 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 15-Nov-11
1.1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.33 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 22-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 29-Nov-11 1.2 <1 <2 5 <1 0.62 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 6-Dec-11 0.88 <1 <2 5 <1
0.29 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 13-Dec-11 0.82 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 20-Dec-11 0.83 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-432 224 St. @122 Ave. 28-Dec-11 0.67 <1 NA 7 <1 0.33 MPR-433
232 St. North of 130 Ave. 4-Jan-11 0.73 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 11-Jan-11 0.7 <1 <2 3 <1 0.5 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 18-Jan-11 0.85 <1 <2 5 <1 1
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 25-Jan-11 0.74 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 1-Feb-11 0.63 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 8-Feb-11 0.71 <1 66
5 <1 0.34
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 54 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 15-Feb-11 0.75 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 22-Feb-11 0.92 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 1-Mar-11
0.82 <1 2 3 <1 0.29 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 8-Mar-11 0.74 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 15-Mar-11 0.71 <1 <2 4 <1 0.49 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.
22-Mar-11 0.83 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 29-Mar-11 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 5-Apr-11 0.84 <1 <2 5 <1 0.39 MPR-433 232 St. North
of 130 Ave. 12-Apr-11 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.41 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 19-Apr-11 0.69 <1 <2 6 <1 0.39 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 26-Apr-11 1.2 <1 <2 5 <1 0.23 MPR-433 232
St. North of 130 Ave. 3-May-11 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 10-May-11 0.68 <1 <2 9 <1 0.39 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 17-May-11 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-433
232 St. North of 130 Ave. 24-May-11 0.7 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 31-May-11 0.7 <1 2 10 <1 0.3 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 7-Jun-11 0.69 <1 <2 10 <1 0.36
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 14-Jun-11 0.8 <1 <2 8 <1 0.23 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 21-Jun-11 0.78 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 28-Jun-11 0.73 <1
<2 10 <1 0.28 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 5-Jul-11 0.71 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 12-Jul-11 0.71 <1 <2 10 <1 0.21
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 55 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 19-Jul-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.21 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 26-Jul-11 0.8 <1 <2 12 <1 0.34 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 3-Aug-11
0.88 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 9-Aug-11 0.91 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 16-Aug-11 0.99 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130
Ave. 23-Aug-11 0.68 <1 <2 12 <1 0.66 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 30-Aug-11 0.77 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 6-Sep-11 0.44 <1 <2 12 <1 0.2 MPR-433 232 St.
North of 130 Ave. 13-Sep-11 0.75 <1 <2 10 <1 0.18 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 20-Sep-11 0.74 <1 <2 11 <1 <0.06 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 27-Sep-11 0.82 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 4-Oct-11 0.76 <1 <2 11 <1 0.36 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 11-Oct-11 0.69 <1 2 11 <1 0.29 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 18-Oct-11 1 <1 <2
10 <1 0.25 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 25-Oct-11 0.97 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 1-Nov-11 0.86 <1 4 7 <1 0.26 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 8-Nov-11
1.1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.32 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 15-Nov-11 0.95 <1 4 5 <1 0.36 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 22-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.23 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.
29-Nov-11 1.3 <1 <2 5 <1 0.63 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 6-Dec-11 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.94 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 13-Dec-11 0.79 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 56 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 20-Dec-11 1.3 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 28-Dec-11 0.73 <1 NA 6 <1 0.3 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 4-Jan-11
0.15 <1 <2 3 <1 0.31 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 11-Jan-11 0.49 <1 <2 4 <1 0.43 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 18-Jan-11 0.26 <1 <2 4 <1 0.56 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A
St. 25-Jan-11 0.14 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 1-Feb-11 0.16 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 8-Feb-11 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR-434 102 Ave. East
of 241A St. 15-Feb-11 0.28 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 22-Feb-11 0.66 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 1-Mar-11 0.35 <1 <2 3 <1 0.29 MPR-434 102
Ave. East of 241A St. 8-Mar-11 0.5 <1 <2 3 <1 0.27 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 15-Mar-11 0.19 <1 <2 5 <1 0.43 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 22-Mar-11 0.47 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 23-Mar-11 0.21 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 29-Mar-11 0.34 <1 <2 5 <1 0.43 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 5-Apr-11 0.35 <1
<2 4 <1 0.5 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 12-Apr-11 0.61 <1 <2 5 <1 0.39 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 19-Apr-11 0.73 <1 <2 5 <1 0.38 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 26-Apr-11
0.56 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 3-May-11 0.34 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 10-May-11 0.33 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 57 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 17-May-11 0.22 <1 <2 9 <1 0.32 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 24-May-11 0.38 <1 12 9 <1 1.9 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 31-May-11
0.88 <1 2 9 <1 0.32 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 7-Jun-11 0.38 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 14-Jun-11 0.21 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A
St. 21-Jun-11 0.18 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 28-Jun-11 0.45 <1 <2 14 <1 0.26 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 5-Jul-11 0.49 <1 4 11 <1 0.32 MPR-434 102 Ave.
East of 241A St. 12-Jul-11 0.45 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 19-Jul-11 0.24 <1 <2 14 <1 0.25 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 26-Jul-11 0.23 <1 <2 13 <1 0.29
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 3-Aug-11 0.54 <1 <2 12 <1 0.31 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 9-Aug-11 0.49 <1 2 13 <1 0.29 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 16-Aug-11 0.19 <1
<2 13 <1 0.26 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 23-Aug-11 0.3 <1 <2 14 <1 0.32 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 30-Aug-11 0.46 <1 <2 11 <1 0.25 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 6-Sep-11
0.45 <1 2 13 <1 0.32 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 13-Sep-11 0.49 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 20-Sep-11 0.28 <1 <2 16 <1 0.07 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A
St. 27-Sep-11 0.35 <1 2 14 <1 0.21 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 4-Oct-11 0.12 <1 4 12 <1 0.34 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 11-Oct-11 0.29 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 58 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 18-Oct-11 0.31 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 25-Oct-11 0.16 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 1-Nov-11
0.26 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 8-Nov-11 0.55 <1 <2 9 <1 0.35 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 15-Nov-11 0.51 <1 <2 8 <1 0.3 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.
22-Nov-11 0.63 <1 <2 7 <1 0.31 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 29-Nov-11 0.41 <1 2 6 <1 0.33 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 6-Dec-11 0.89 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34 MPR-434 102 Ave. East
of 241A St. 13-Dec-11 0.64 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 20-Dec-11 0.64 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 28-Dec-11 0.6 <1 NA 6 <1 0.3 MPR-435 240
St. South of Abernethy Way 4-Jan-11 0.37 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 11-Jan-11 0.38 <1 <2 5 <1 0.39 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 18-Jan-11 0.49
<1 <2 5 <1 0.5 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 25-Jan-11 0.29 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 1-Feb-11 0.22 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy
Way 8-Feb-11 0.28 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 15-Feb-11 0.31 <1 <2 5 <1 0.24 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 22-Feb-11 0.67 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR-435
240 St. South of Abernethy Way 1-Mar-11 0.4 <1 <2 3 <1 0.28 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 8-Mar-11 0.25 <1 <2 4 <1 0.24 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 15-Mar-11 0.26
<1 <2 4 <1 0.37
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 59 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 22-Mar-11 0.38 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 29-Mar-11 0.45 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy
Way 5-Apr-11 0.44 <1 <2 5 <1 0.36 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 12-Apr-11 0.37 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 19-Apr-11 0.51 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32 MPR-435
240 St. South of Abernethy Way 26-Apr-11 0.43 <1 <2 5 <1 0.24 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 3-May-11 0.26 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 10-May-11 0.17
<1 <2 7 <1 0.33 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 17-May-11 0.33 <1 <2 8 <1 0.3 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 24-May-11 0.27 <1 <2 8 <1 0.4 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy
Way 31-May-11 0.28 <1 2 9 <1 0.27 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 7-Jun-11 0.29 <1 2 11 <1 0.36 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 14-Jun-11 0.39 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26 MPR-435
240 St. South of Abernethy Way 21-Jun-11 0.34 <1 <2 11 <1 0.21 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 28-Jun-11 0.41 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 5-Jul-11
0.4 <1 2 11 <1 0.32 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 12-Jul-11 0.13 <1 <2 14 <1 0.33 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 19-Jul-11 0.23 <1 4 13 <1 0.21 MPR-435 240 St. South
of Abernethy Way 26-Jul-11 0.21 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 3-Aug-11 0.19 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 9-Aug-11 0.46 <1 <2 14
<1 0.3 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 16-Aug-11 0.39 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 60 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 23-Aug-11 0.09 <1 6 12 <1 0.26 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 30-Aug-11 0.45 <1 2 14 <1 0.26 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy
Way 6-Sep-11 0.38 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 13-Sep-11 0.47 <1 2 13 <1 0.19 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 20-Sep-11 0.29 <1 <2 17 <1 0.06 MPR-435
240 St. South of Abernethy Way 27-Sep-11 0.31 <1 4 13 <1 0.21 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 4-Oct-11 0.11 <1 24 13 <1 0.31 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 11-Oct-11
0.2 <1 8 10 <1 0.27 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 18-Oct-11 0.27 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 25-Oct-11 0.15 <1 8 10 <1 0.25 MPR-435 240 St. South
of Abernethy Way 1-Nov-11 0.23 <1 76 11 <1 0.21 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 8-Nov-11 0.31 <1 240 9 <1 0.24 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 15-Nov-11 0.42 <1 52 10
<1 0.23 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 22-Nov-11 0.31 <1 <2 6 <1 0.23 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 29-Nov-11 0.36 <1 170 6 <1 0.29 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy
Way 6-Dec-11 0.75 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 13-Dec-11 0.51 <1 <2 5 <1 0.22 MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 20-Dec-11 0.47 <1 22 6 <1 0.29 MPR-435
240 St. South of Abernethy Way 28-Dec-11 0.5 <1 NA 6 <1 0.29 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 4-Jan-11 0.7 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 11-Jan-11 0.51 <1 <2
4 <1 0.36 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 18-Jan-11 0.37 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 61 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 25-Jan-11 0.53 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 1-Feb-11 0.32 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.
8-Feb-11 0.38 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 15-Feb-11 0.22 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 22-Feb-11 0.38 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26 MPR-436 125 Ave.
West of Ansell St. 1-Mar-11 0.27 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 8-Mar-11 0.45 <1 84 4 <1 0.22 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 15-Mar-11 0.3 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 22-Mar-11 0.22 <1 [Contam ination.] LA 5 <1 0.36 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 29-Mar-11 0.23 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell
St. 5-Apr-11 0.63 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 12-Apr-11 0.23 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 19-Apr-11 0.37 <1 <2 6 <1 0.26 MPR-436 125 Ave.
West of Ansell St. 26-Apr-11 0.47 <1 <2 5 <1 0.2 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 3-May-11 0.39 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 10-May-11 0.2 <1 <2 8 <1 0.23
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 17-May-11 0.13 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 24-May-11 0.29 <1 <2 7 <1 0.23 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 31-May-11 0.15
<1 2 11 <1 0.2 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 7-Jun-11 0.41 <1 <2 11 <1 0.3 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 14-Jun-11 0.4 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 62 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 21-Jun-11 0.37 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 28-Jun-11 0.52 <1 2 14 <1 0.2 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.
5-Jul-11 0.52 <1 2 10 <1 0.28 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 12-Jul-11 0.36 <1 2 14 <1 0.21 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 19-Jul-11 0.26 <1 4 13 <1 0.22 MPR-436 125 Ave.
West of Ansell St. 26-Jul-11 0.57 <1 <2 13 <1 0.32 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 3-Aug-11 0.56 <1 <2 12 <1 0.45 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 9-Aug-11 0.4 <1 <2 14 <1 0.26
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 16-Aug-11 0.37 <1 <2 15 <1 0.22 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 23-Aug-11 0.24 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 30-Aug-11
0.22 <1 <2 13 <1 0.2 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 6-Sep-11 0.46 <1 <2 15 <1 0.22 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 13-Sep-11 0.51 <1 <2 12 <1 0.18 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 20-Sep-11 0.03 <1 110 17 <1 <0.06 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 27-Sep-11 0.14 <1 340 14 <1 0.2 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 4-Oct-11 0.03 <1 1900 13 <1 0.23
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 11-Oct-11 0.03 <1 120 13 <1 0.27 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 18-Oct-11 0.2 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 25-Oct-11
0.11 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 1-Nov-11 0.29 <1 4 12 <1 0.24 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 8-Nov-11 0.24 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell
St. 15-Nov-11 0.06 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 63 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 22-Nov-11 0.17 <1 12 6 <1 0.22 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 29-Nov-11 0.21 <1 <2 7 <1 0.25 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.
6-Dec-11 0.42 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 13-Dec-11 0.35 <1 <2 5 <1 0.24 MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St. 20-Dec-11 0.28 <1 <2 5 <1 0.22 MPR-436 125 Ave.
West of Ansell St. 28-Dec-11 0.45 <1 NA 6 <1 0.26 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 4-Jan-11 1.1 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 11-Jan-11 0.97 <1 <2 5 <1 0.41 MPR-437 248 St. @116
Ave. 18-Jan-11 0.98 <1 <2 4 <1 0.78 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 25-Jan-11 0.64 <1 <2 5 <1 0.37 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 1-Feb-11 0.27 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 8-Feb-11
0.75 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 15-Feb-11 0.71 <1 2 5 <1 0.27 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 22-Feb-11 0.45 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 1-Mar-11 1.1 <1 <2 3
<1 0.27 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 8-Mar-11 0.64 <1 <2 3 <1 0.27 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 15-Mar-11 0.89 <1 <2 3 <1 0.44 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 22-Mar-11 0.87 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-437
248 St. @116 Ave. 29-Mar-11 0.69 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 5-Apr-11 0.68 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 12-Apr-11 0.7 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR-437 248 St. @116
Ave. 19-Apr-11 0.58 <1 <2 6 <1 0.72
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 64 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 26-Apr-11 0.79 <1 <2 5 <1 0.21 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 3-May-11 0.82 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 10-May-11 0.49 <1 2 8 <1 0.25
MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 17-May-11 0.65 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 24-May-11 0.54 <1 <2 8 <1 0.29 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 31-May-11 0.56 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23 MPR-437 248
St. @116 Ave. 7-Jun-11 0.34 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 14-Jun-11 0.84 <1 2 10 <1 0.21 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 21-Jun-11 0.3 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave.
28-Jun-11 0.45 <1 <2 12 <1 0.18 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 5-Jul-11 0.35 <1 6 10 <1 0.3 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 12-Jul-11 0.35 <1 <2 12 <1 0.2 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 19-Jul-11 0.44
<1 <2 12 <1 0.23 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 26-Jul-11 0.91 <1 <2 12 <1 0.28 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 3-Aug-11 0.34 <1 <2 12 <1 0.3 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 9-Aug-11 0.31 <1 <2 13 <1
0.25 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 16-Aug-11 0.52 <1 2 14 <1 0.23 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 23-Aug-11 0.35 <1 <2 14 <1 0.27 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 30-Aug-11 0.64 <1 2 12 <1 0.22 MPR-437
248 St. @116 Ave. 6-Sep-11 0.77 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 13-Sep-11 0.56 <1 2 12 <1 0.17 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 20-Sep-11 0.64 <1 2 15 <1 0.06
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 65 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 27-Sep-11 0.5 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 4-Oct-11 0.3 <1 2 12 <1 0.3 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 11-Oct-11 0.47 <1 4 12 <1 0.31
MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 18-Oct-11 0.42 <1 <2 10 <1 0.22 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 25-Oct-11 0.58 <1 <2 9 <1 0.28 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 1-Nov-11 0.71 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27 MPR-437 248
St. @116 Ave. 8-Nov-11 0.56 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 15-Nov-11 0.66 <1 <2 9 <1 0.33 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 22-Nov-11 0.75 <1 <2 6 <1 0.22 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave.
29-Nov-11 0.63 <1 2 6 <1 0.29 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 6-Dec-11 0.78 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 13-Dec-11 0.58 <1 <2 5 <1 0.23 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 20-Dec-11 0.56
<1 2 6 <1 0.3 MPR-437 248 St. @116 Ave. 28-Dec-11 0.62 <1 NA 7 <1 0.27 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 4-Jan-11 0.5 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 11-Jan-11 0.78
<1 <2 4 <1 0.37 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 18-Jan-11 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.46 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 25-Jan-11 0.76 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 1-Feb-11
0.38 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 8-Feb-11 0.51 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 15-Feb-11 0.44 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.
22-Feb-11 0.34 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 66 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 1-Mar-11 0.35 <1 <2 3 <1 0.27 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 8-Mar-11 0.55 <1 <2 4 <1 0.24 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 15-Mar-11
0.71 <1 <2 3 <1 0.47 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 22-Mar-11 0.4 <1 <2 5 <1 0.37 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 29-Mar-11 0.24 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.
5-Apr-11 0.58 <1 <2 5 <1 0.41 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 12-Apr-11 0.63 <1 <2 5 <1 0.54 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 19-Apr-11 0.55 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR-438 125 Ave. West
off 256 St. 26-Apr-11 0.44 <1 <2 5 <1 0.21 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 3-May-11 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 10-May-11 0.4 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3 MPR-438 125
Ave. West off 256 St. 17-May-11 0.29 <1 <2 9 <1 0.31 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 24-May-11 0.41 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 31-May-11 0.44 <1 <2 9 <1 0.23
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 7-Jun-11 0.24 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 14-Jun-11 0.17 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 21-Jun-11 0.25 <1
<2 11 <1 0.27 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 28-Jun-11 0.44 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 5-Jul-11 0.31 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 12-Jul-11
0.13 <1 <2 10 <1 0.26 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 19-Jul-11 0.05 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 26-Jul-11 0.07 <1 <2 13 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 67 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 3-Aug-11 0.15 <1 2 11 <1 0.28 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 9-Aug-11 0.09 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 16-Aug-11
0.6 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 23-Aug-11 0.34 <1 <2 15 <1 0.25 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 30-Aug-11 0.43 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256
St. 6-Sep-11 0.03 <1 <2 14 <1 0.25 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 13-Sep-11 0.05 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 20-Sep-11 0.29 <1 2 15 <1 0.45 MPR-438 125 Ave.
West off 256 St. 27-Sep-11 0.27 <1 <2 14 <1 0.24 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 4-Oct-11 0.27 <1 2 13 <1 0.31 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 11-Oct-11 0.08 <1 2 12 <1 0.27 MPR-438
125 Ave. West off 256 St. 18-Oct-11 0.17 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 25-Oct-11 0.35 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 1-Nov-11 0.12 <1 <2 11
<1 0.22 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 8-Nov-11 0.3 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 15-Nov-11 0.48 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 22-Nov-11
0.62 <1 <2 6 <1 0.23 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 29-Nov-11 0.37 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 6-Dec-11 0.4 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.
13-Dec-11 0.5 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 20-Dec-11 0.46 <1 <2 6 <1 0.24 MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 28-Dec-11 0.48 <1 NA 7 <1 0.32
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 68 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 4-Jan-11 0.55 <1 <2 4 <1 0.37 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 11-Jan-11 0.96 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 18-Jan-11 0.79 <1 <2 5 <1 0.42 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 25-Jan-11 0.42 <1 4 4 <1 0.37 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 1-Feb-11 0.27
<1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 8-Feb-11 0.54 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 15-Feb-11 0.62 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 22-Feb-11 0.29 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 1-Mar-11 0.71 <1 <2 3 <1 0.24 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 8-Mar-11 0.59
<1 <2 3 <1 0.22 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 15-Mar-11 0.41 <1 <2 4 <1 0.25 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 22-Mar-11 0.64 <1 <2 5 <1 0.43 MPR-439 130 Ave.
@251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 29-Mar-11 0.71 <1 26 5 <1 0.27 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 5-Apr-11 0.31 <1 <2 4 <1 0.39 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 12-Apr-11
0.46 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 19-Apr-11 0.19 <1 2 6 <1 0.27 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 26-Apr-11 0.61 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR-439 130 Ave.
@251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 3-May-11 0.53 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 10-May-11 0.55 <1 <2 7 <1 0.23 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 17-May-11
0.47 <1 <2 7 <1 0.23 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 24-May-11 0.46 <1 48 7 <1 0.24 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 31-May-11 0.35 <1 2 10 <1 0.2
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 69 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 7-Jun-11 0.16 <1 <2 14 <1 0.27 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 14-Jun-11 0.35 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 21-Jun-11 0.39 <1 <2 13 <1 0.19 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 28-Jun-11 0.18 <1 4 14 <1 0.21 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 5-Jul-11 0.35
<1 <2 13 <1 0.2 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 12-Jul-11 0.05 <1 16 15 <1 0.28 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 19-Jul-11 0.21 <1 10 14 <1 0.21 MPR-439 130 Ave.
@251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 26-Jul-11 0.11 <1 12 15 <1 0.29 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 3-Aug-11 0.06 <1 26 16 <1 0.23 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 9-Aug-11
0.07 <1 4 17 <1 0.23 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 16-Aug-11 <0.01 <1 32 17 <1 0.23 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 23-Aug-11 0.12 <1 <2 19 <1 0.25 MPR-439 130
Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 30-Aug-11 0.05 <1 52 17 <1 0.28 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 6-Sep-11 0.58 <1 <2 16 <1 0.23 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 13-Sep-11
0.19 <1 <2 15 <1 0.26 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 20-Sep-11 0.61 <1 <2 17 <1 <0.06 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 27-Sep-11 0.57 <1 <2 15 <1 0.19 MPR-439
130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 4-Oct-11 0.36 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 11-Oct-11 0.04 <1 4 12 <1 0.28 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.)
18-Oct-11 0.13 <1 46 11 <1 0.24 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 25-Oct-11 0.51 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 1-Nov-11 0.58 <1 <2 10 <1 0.2
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 70 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 8-Nov-11 0.58 <1 <2 9 <1 0.26 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 15-Nov-11 0.7 <1 2 9 <1 0.25 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 22-Nov-11 0.93 <1 2 6 <1 0.26 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 29-Nov-11 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 6-Dec-11 0.72 <1
<2 5 <1 0.28 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 13-Dec-11 0.93 <1 <2 4 <1 0.23 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 20-Dec-11 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.25 MPR-439 130 Ave. @251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 28-Dec-11 1 <1 NA 6 <1 0.24 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 4-Jan-11 0.77 <1 <2 3 <1 0.34 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 4-Jan-11 0.77 <1 <2 3 <1 0.34 MPR-440 232 St. @117
Ave. 11-Jan-11 0.75 <1 <2 3 <1 0.45 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 18-Jan-11 0.79 <1 <2 5 <1 0.69 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 25-Jan-11 0.89 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 1-Feb-11
0.79 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 8-Feb-11 0.87 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 15-Feb-11 0.69 <1 <2 4 <1 0.38 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 22-Feb-11 0.81 <1 <2
4 <1 0.29 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 1-Mar-11 1.3 <1 <2 3 <1 0.35 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 8-Mar-11 0.83 <1 <2 3 <1 0.3 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 15-Mar-11 0.78 <1 <2 3 <1 0.52 MPR-440
232 St. @117 Ave. 22-Mar-11 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 29-Mar-11 1.6 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 71 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 5-Apr-11 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.44 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 12-Apr-11 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.4 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 19-Apr-11 0.88 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27 MPR-440
232 St. @117 Ave. 26-Apr-11 1.3 <1 <2 5 <1 0.23 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 3-May-11 0.97 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 10-May-11 0.73 <1 <2 9 <1 0.35 MPR-440 232 St. @117
Ave. 17-May-11 1.2 <1 2 5 <1 0.33 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 24-May-11 0.76 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 31-May-11 0.75 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 7-Jun-11
0.8 <1 <2 14 <1 0.42 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 14-Jun-11 0.92 <1 <2 8 <1 0.26 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 21-Jun-11 0.92 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 28-Jun-11 0.85 <1 <2
10 <1 0.23 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 5-Jul-11 0.73 <1 <2 10 <1 0.33 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 12-Jul-11 0.76 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 19-Jul-11 0.92 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 26-Jul-11 0.95 <1 2 10 <1 0.3 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 3-Aug-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 9-Aug-11 0.92 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-440 232 St.
@117 Ave. 16-Aug-11 0.87 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 23-Aug-11 0.7 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 30-Aug-11 0.78 <1 <2 10 <1 0.22
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 72 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 6-Sep-11 0.88 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 13-Sep-11 0.88 <1 2 10 <1 0.2 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 20-Sep-11 0.86 <1 4 11 <1 0.06
MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 27-Sep-11 0.79 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 4-Oct-11 0.88 <1 <2 10 <1 0.26 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 11-Oct-11 0.65 <1 <2 11 <1 0.39 MPR-440
232 St. @117 Ave. 18-Oct-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 25-Oct-11 0.96 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 1-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 9 <1 0.27 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave.
8-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 15-Nov-11 1.2 <1 <2 8 <1 0.27 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 22-Nov-11 1.2 <1 4 5 <1 0.27 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 29-Nov-11 1.3 <1
<2 7 <1 0.65 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 6-Dec-11 1.1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 13-Dec-11 0.9 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 20-Dec-11 0.71 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-440 232 St. @117 Ave. 28-Dec-11 0.86 <1 NA 5 <1 0.28 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 4-Jan-11 0.67 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 11-Jan-11 0.67 <1 <2 4 <1 0.49 MPR-441
132 Ave. @Cedar Way 18-Jan-11 0.92 <1 <2 5 <1 0.84 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 25-Jan-11 0.62 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 1-Feb-11 0.62 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 73 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 8-Feb-11 0.76 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 15-Feb-11 0.77 <1 2 5 <1 0.28 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 22-Feb-11 0.68 <1 <2 5
<1 0.32 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 1-Mar-11 0.61 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 8-Mar-11 0.69 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 15-Mar-11 0.64 <1 <2 4 <1 0.45
MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 22-Mar-11 0.71 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 29-Mar-11 0.67 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 5-Apr-11 0.76 <1 <2 5 <1 0.42 MPR-441
132 Ave. @Cedar Way 12-Apr-11 0.93 <1 <2 5 <1 0.38 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 19-Apr-11 0.91 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 26-Apr-11 0.82 <1 <2 5 <1 0.24 MPR-441 132
Ave. @Cedar Way 3-May-11 0.77 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 10-May-11 0.69 <1 <2 7 <1 0.36 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 17-May-11 0.67 <1 <2 6 <1 0.37 MPR-441 132 Ave.
@Cedar Way 24-May-11 0.63 <1 2 7 <1 0.33 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 31-May-11 0.65 <1 <2 8 <1 0.29 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 7-Jun-11 0.74 <1 2 9 <1 0.39 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar
Way 14-Jun-11 0.75 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 21-Jun-11 0.72 <1 <2 9 <1 0.2 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 28-Jun-11 0.75 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way
5-Jul-11 0.47 <1 <2 10 <1 0.32
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 74 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 12-Jul-11 0.69 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 19-Jul-11 0.86 <1 14 10 <1 0.21 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 26-Jul-11 0.76 <1 2
10 <1 0.31 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 3-Aug-11 0.81 <1 6 12 <1 0.31 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 9-Aug-11 0.77 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 16-Aug-11 0.81 <1 <2 10 <1
0.21 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 23-Aug-11 0.67 <1 2 12 <1 0.24 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 30-Aug-11 0.72 <1 2 11 <1 0.22 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 6-Sep-11 0.59 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26
MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 13-Sep-11 0.73 <1 <2 11 <1 0.18 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 20-Sep-11 0.79 <1 <2 12 <1 0.06 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 27-Sep-11 0.9 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25 MPR-441
132 Ave. @Cedar Way 4-Oct-11 0.41 <1 4 11 <1 0.36 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 11-Oct-11 0.68 <1 <2 11 <1 0.34 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 18-Oct-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3 MPR-441 132 Ave.
@Cedar Way 25-Oct-11 0.83 <1 <2 11 <1 0.3 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 1-Nov-11 0.83 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 8-Nov-11 0.74 <1 <2 9 <1 0.32 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar
Way 15-Nov-11 1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.5 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 22-Nov-11 1.1 <1 2 5 <1 0.23 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 29-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.58 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 6-Dec-11
1 <1 <2 9 <1 0.35
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 75 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 13-Dec-11 0.86 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 20-Dec-11 0.86 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR-441 132 Ave. @Cedar Way 28-Dec-11 0.74 <1 NA 5
<1 0.29 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 4-Jan-11 0.2 <1 2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 11-Jan-11 0.55 <1 <2 4 <1 0.44 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 18-Jan-11 0.23 <1
<2 5 <1 0.7 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 25-Jan-11 0.36 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 1-Feb-11 0.35 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 8-Feb-11
0.41 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 15-Feb-11 0.35 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 22-Feb-11 0.37 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St.
1-Mar-11 0.41 <1 4 4 <1 0.28 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 8-Mar-11 0.35 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 15-Mar-11 0.35 <1 4 4 <1 0.49 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton
St. 22-Mar-11 0.36 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 29-Mar-11 0.28 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 5-Apr-11 0.24 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR-442 Princess St.
@Ditton St. 12-Apr-11 0.32 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 19-Apr-11 0.39 <1 <2 6 <1 0.34 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 26-Apr-11 0.34 <1 <2 7 <1 0.21 MPR-442 Princess
St. @Ditton St. 3-May-11 0.39 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 10-May-11 0.31 <1 <2 9 <1 0.25
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 76 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 17-May-11 0.24 <1 <2 9 <1 0.32 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 24-May-11 0.24 <1 <2 9 <1 0.33 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 31-May-11
0.26 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 7-Jun-11 0.32 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 14-Jun-11 0.33 <1 <2 11 <1 0.22 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St.
21-Jun-11 0.34 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 28-Jun-11 0.3 <1 2 12 <1 0.21 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 5-Jul-11 0.33 <1 <2 11 <1 0.35 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton
St. 12-Jul-11 0.29 <1 2 14 <1 0.24 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 19-Jul-11 0.35 <1 230 13 <1 0.2 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 26-Jul-11 0.34 <1 2 13 <1 0.3 MPR-442 Princess St.
@Ditton St. 3-Aug-11 0.38 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 9-Aug-11 0.32 <1 <2 13 <1 0.27 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 16-Aug-11 0.29 <1 <2 13 <1 0.28 MPR-442 Princess
St. @Ditton St. 23-Aug-11 0.22 <1 2 14 <1 0.26 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 30-Aug-11 0.36 <1 <2 14 <1 0.27 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 6-Sep-11 0.19 <1 10 14 <1 0.28 MPR-442
Princess St. @Ditton St. 13-Sep-11 0.24 <1 4 14 <1 0.22 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 20-Sep-11 0.2 <1 2 15 <1 0.06 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 27-Sep-11 0.33 <1 10 14 <1 0.21
MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 4-Oct-11 0.16 <1 4 14 <1 0.27 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 11-Oct-11 0.17 <1 28 12 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 77 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 18-Oct-11 0.33 <1 2 12 <1 0.22 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 25-Oct-11 0.23 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 1-Nov-11
0.35 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 8-Nov-11 0.34 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 15-Nov-11 0.29 <1 2 9 <1 2.1 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St.
22-Nov-11 0.46 <1 4 6 <1 0.2 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 29-Nov-11 0.61 <1 <2 7 <1 0.47 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 6-Dec-11 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton
St. 13-Dec-11 0.44 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 20-Dec-11 0.43 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27 MPR-442 Princess St. @Ditton St. 28-Dec-11 0.41 <1 NA 6 <1 0.26 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan
4-Jan-11 0.46 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 11-Jan-11 0.47 <1 2 4 <1 0.45 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 18-Jan-11 0.53 <1 <2 5 <1 1.2 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 25-Jan-11 0.52 <1
<2 6 <1 0.25 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 1-Feb-11 0.57 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 8-Feb-11 0.63 <1 <2 5 <1 0.37 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 15-Feb-11 0.74 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-443
216 St. @Donovan 22-Feb-11 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 1-Mar-11 0.64 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 8-Mar-11 0.51 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan
15-Mar-11 0.54 <1 <2 4 <1 0.43
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 78 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 22-Mar-11 0.48 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 29-Mar-11 0.4 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 5-Apr-11 0.43 <1 <2 5 <1 0.4 MPR-443
216 St. @Donovan 12-Apr-11 0.69 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 19-Apr-11 0.66 <1 <2 7 <1 0.26 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 26-Apr-11 0.4 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan
3-May-11 0.65 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 10-May-11 0.55 <1 <2 9 <1 0.36 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 17-May-11 0.6 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 24-May-11 0.45
<1 <2 8 <1 0.33 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 31-May-11 0.44 <1 2 10 <1 0.3 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 7-Jun-11 0.59 <1 <2 10 <1 0.39 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 14-Jun-11 0.46 <1 <2 11 <1 0.21
MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 21-Jun-11 0.55 <1 2 9 <1 0.25 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 28-Jun-11 0.55 <1 6 11 <1 0.21 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 5-Jul-11 0.54 <1 2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-443 216 St.
@Donovan 12-Jul-11 0.57 <1 6 12 <1 0.21 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 19-Jul-11 0.57 <1 2 12 <1 0.19 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 26-Jul-11 0.52 <1 4 12 <1 0.79 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 3-Aug-11
0.71 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 9-Aug-11 0.51 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 16-Aug-11 0.71 <1 2 11 <1 0.25
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 79 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 23-Aug-11 0.49 <1 <2 14 <1 0.22 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 30-Aug-11 0.62 <1 4 12 <1 0.23 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 6-Sep-11 0.54 <1 6 12 <1 0.26
MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 13-Sep-11 0.65 <1 8 11 <1 0.23 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 20-Sep-11 0.97 <1 <2 14 <1 0.21 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 27-Sep-11 0.78 <1 10 13 <1 0.22 MPR-443 216
St. @Donovan 4-Oct-11 0.49 <1 24 11 <1 0.29 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 11-Oct-11 0.39 <1 12 12 <1 0.35 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 18-Oct-11 0.62 <1 12 11 <1 0.33 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan
25-Oct-11 0.79 <1 <2 9 <1 1.2 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 1-Nov-11 0.52 <1 <2 8 <1 0.25 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 8-Nov-11 0.42 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 15-Nov-11 0.5 <1
2 9 <1 0.72 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 22-Nov-11 0.67 <1 <2 6 <1 0.23 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 29-Nov-11 0.81 <1 2 5 <1 0.47 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 6-Dec-11 1.1 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32 MPR-443
216 St. @Donovan 13-Dec-11 0.81 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 20-Dec-11 0.73 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-443 216 St. @Donovan 28-Dec-11 0.64 <1 NA 7 <1 0.27 MPR-444 Foreman Drive
@232nd St. 4-Jan-11 0.36 <1 <2 3 <1 0.39 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 11-Jan-11 0.32 <1 2 3 <1 0.45 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 18-Jan-11 0.49 <1 <2 4 <1 0.63
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 80 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 25-Jan-11 0.44 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 1-Feb-11 0.43 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 8-Feb-11
0.36 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 15-Feb-11 0.4 <1 <2 4 <1 0.23 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 22-Feb-11 0.56 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St.
1-Mar-11 0.48 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 8-Mar-11 0.45 <1 <2 3 <1 0.32 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 15-Mar-11 0.44 <1 <2 3 <1 0.48 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd
St. 22-Mar-11 0.17 <1 <2 4 <1 0.39 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 29-Mar-11 0.53 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 5-Apr-11 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR-444 Foreman Drive
@232nd St. 12-Apr-11 0.53 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 19-Apr-11 0.35 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 26-Apr-11 0.63 <1 <2 4 <1 0.24 MPR-444 Foreman
Drive @232nd St. 3-May-11 0.58 <1 <2 4 <1 0.21 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 10-May-11 0.36 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 17-May-11 0.76 <1 <2 5 <1 0.38 MPR-444
Foreman Drive @232nd St. 24-May-11 0.32 <1 <2 9 <1 0.43 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 31-May-11 0.35 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 7-Jun-11 0.33 <1 2 10 <1 0.31
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 14-Jun-11 0.25 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 21-Jun-11 0.38 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 81 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 28-Jun-11 0.31 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 5-Jul-11 0.38 <1 4 10 <1 0.4 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 12-Jul-11
0.38 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 19-Jul-11 0.36 <1 2 12 <1 0.2 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 26-Jul-11 0.32 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St.
3-Aug-11 0.38 <1 <2 13 <1 0.24 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 9-Aug-11 0.44 <1 4 12 <1 0.27 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 16-Aug-11 0.54 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR-444 Foreman Drive
@232nd St. 23-Aug-11 0.2 <1 <2 12 <1 0.84 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 30-Aug-11 0.36 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 6-Sep-11 0.49 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27 MPR-444 Foreman
Drive @232nd St. 13-Sep-11 0.42 <1 2 12 <1 0.23 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 20-Sep-11 0.32 <1 2 14 <1 <0.06 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 27-Sep-11 0.39 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29 MPR-444
Foreman Drive @232nd St. 4-Oct-11 0.28 <1 <2 12 <1 0.31 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 11-Oct-11 0.23 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 18-Oct-11 0.14 <1 2 9 <1 0.26
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 25-Oct-11 0.34 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 1-Nov-11 0.4 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 8-Nov-11 0.44 <1 <2 8
<1 0.29 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 15-Nov-11 0.35 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 22-Nov-11 0.49 <1 <2 5 <1 0.2
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 82 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 29-Nov-11 0.44 <1 20 5 <1 0.35 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 6-Dec-11 0.71 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 13-Dec-11
0.55 <1 <2 6 <1 0.39 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 20-Dec-11 0.44 <1 <2 5 <1 0.22 MPR-444 Foreman Drive @232nd St. 28-Dec-11 0.51 <1 NA 6 <1 0.27 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 4-Jan-11
0.3 <1 8 4 <1 0.26 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 11-Jan-11 0.36 <1 2 4 <1 0.29 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 18-Jan-11 0.43 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 25-Jan-11
0.34 <1 <2 4 <1 0.39 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 1-Feb-11 0.17 <1 28 5 <1 0.31 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 8-Feb-11 0.41 <1 150 4 <1 0.3 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 15-Feb-11
0.15 <1 66 4 <1 0.26 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 22-Feb-11 0.23 <1 50 4 <1 0.25 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 1-Mar-11 0.49 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 8-Mar-11
0.52 <1 <2 3 <1 0.22 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 15-Mar-11 0.4 <1 26 3 <1 0.25 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 22-Mar-11 0.46 <1 <2 4 <1 0.38 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 29-Mar-11
0.35 <1 40 4 <1 0.27 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 5-Apr-11 0.43 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 12-Apr-11 0.39 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 19-Apr-11
0.12 <1 2 6 <1 0.25 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 26-Apr-11 0.24 <1 10 4 <1 0.24
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 83 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 3-May-11 0.42 <1 110 4 <1 0.26 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 10-May-11 0.16 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 17-May-11 0.09
<1 50 7 <1 0.24 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 24-May-11 0.12 <1 50 9 <1 0.24 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 31-May-11 0.04 <1 110 10 <1 0.21 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 7-Jun-11
0.37 <1 <2 10 <1 0.2 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 14-Jun-11 0.05 <1 98 12 <1 0.19 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 21-Jun-11 0.08 <1 220 11 <1 0.19 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 28-Jun-11
0.31 <1 10 14 <1 0.24 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 5-Jul-11 0.33 <1 74 13 <1 0.26 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 12-Jul-11 0.08 <1 170 15 <1 0.21 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 19-Jul-11
0.29 <1 6 14 <1 0.24 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 26-Jul-11 0.3 <1 84 14 <1 0.26 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 3-Aug-11 0.35 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 9-Aug-11
0.15 <1 58 14 <1 0.25 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 16-Aug-11 0.46 <1 2 15 <1 0.22 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 23-Aug-11 0.23 <1 <2 15 <1 0.3 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 30-Aug-11
0.5 <1 2 15 <1 0.2 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 6-Sep-11 0.64 <1 <2 14 <1 0.19 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 13-Sep-11 0.21 <1 6 14 <1 0.2 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 20-Sep-11
0.2 <1 2 15 <1 0.24 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 27-Sep-11 0.48 <1 6 14 <1 0.17
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 84 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 4-Oct-11 0.14 <1 44 12 <1 0.25 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 11-Oct-11 0.13 <1 42 13 <1 0.27 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 18-Oct-11 0.27
<1 <2 12 <1 0.26 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 25-Oct-11 0.35 <1 6 9 <1 0.26 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 1-Nov-11 0.34 <1 4 10 <1 0.21 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 8-Nov-11 0.39
<1 8 10 <1 0.21 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 15-Nov-11 0.36 <1 <2 9 <1 0.23 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 22-Nov-11 0.58 <1 4 5 <1 0.23 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 29-Nov-11 0.74
<1 <2 7 <1 0.25 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 6-Dec-11 0.49 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 13-Dec-11 0.8 <1 <2 6 <1 0.24 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 20-Dec-11 0.43
<1 38 7 <1 0.2 MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St. 28-Dec-11 0.54 <1 NA 7 <1 0.19 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 4-Jan-11 0.92 <1 2 3 <1 0.38 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 11-Jan-11
0.99 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 18-Jan-11 0.88 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 25-Jan-11 0.53 <1 2 4 <1 0.45 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow
Place 1-Feb-11 0.93 <1 <2 4 <1 0.38 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 8-Feb-11 1.1 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 15-Feb-11 0.58 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR-446 128th Ave
and Willow Place 22-Feb-11 1.2 <1 2 4 <1 0.33 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 1-Mar-11 0.8 <1 <2 3 <1 0.32
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 85 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 8-Mar-11 0.86 <1 <2 3 <1 0.3 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 15-Mar-11 0.49 <1 <2 3 <1 0.28 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 22-Mar-11
0.64 <1 [Contam ination.] LA 4 <1 0.47 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 29-Mar-11 0.53 <1 <2 4 <1 0.43 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 5-Apr-11 0.45 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR-446 128th
Ave and Willow Place 12-Apr-11 0.38 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 19-Apr-11 0.44 <1 <2 5 <1 0.36 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 26-Apr-11 0.26 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 3-May-11 0.88 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 10-May-11 0.41 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 17-May-11 0.3 <1
<2 7 <1 0.41 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 24-May-11 0.74 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 31-May-11 0.8 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 7-Jun-11
0.64 <1 <2 10 <1 0.38 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 14-Jun-11 0.77 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 21-Jun-11 0.61 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow
Place 28-Jun-11 0.52 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 5-Jul-11 0.45 <1 <2 11 <1 0.32 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 12-Jul-11 0.45 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27 MPR-446 128th
Ave and Willow Place 19-Jul-11 0.41 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 26-Jul-11 0.47 <1 4 13 <1 0.25
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 86 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 3-Aug-11 0.5 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 9-Aug-11 0.68 <1 4 13 <1 0.37 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 16-Aug-11
0.73 <1 2 13 <1 0.46 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 23-Aug-11 0.47 <1 <2 14 <1 0.32 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 30-Aug-11 0.44 <1 <2 14 <1 0.31 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow
Place 6-Sep-11 0.5 <1 <2 13 <1 0.39 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 13-Sep-11 0.42 <1 <2 12 <1 0.21 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 20-Sep-11 0.58 <1 <2 15 <1 0.06 MPR-446 128th
Ave and Willow Place 27-Sep-11 0.68 <1 <2 12 <1 0.32 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 4-Oct-11 0.93 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 11-Oct-11 0.6 <1 <2 11 <1 0.37
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 18-Oct-11 0.78 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 25-Oct-11 0.73 <1 <2 9 <1 0.31 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 1-Nov-11 0.86
<1 <2 9 <1 0.3 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 8-Nov-11 0.92 <1 <2 8 <1 0.25 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 15-Nov-11 0.96 <1 <2 8 <1 0.24 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place
22-Nov-11 0.99 <1 2 5 <1 0.49 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 30-Nov-11 1.2 <1 <2 6 <1 0.24 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 6-Dec-11 0.81 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR-446 128th Ave and
Willow Place 13-Dec-11 0.8 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 20-Dec-11 0.75 <1 <2 7 <1 0.25 MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 28-Dec-11 0.81 <1 NA 6 <1 0.26
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 87 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 4-Jan-11 0.31 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 11-Jan-11 0.35 <1 4 5 <1 0.46 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 18-Jan-11 0.31 <1 <2 6 <1 0.68
MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 25-Jan-11 0.25 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 1-Feb-11 0.32 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 8-Feb-11 0.43 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR-447 117
Ave. @210 St. 15-Feb-11 0.37 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 22-Feb-11 0.43 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 1-Mar-11 0.25 <1 <2 4 <1 0.25 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St.
8-Mar-11 0.32 <1 <2 4 <1 0.25 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 15-Mar-11 0.46 <1 <2 5 <1 0.43 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 22-Mar-11 0.47 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 29-Mar-11 0.27
<1 2 4 <1 0.3 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 5-Apr-11 0.24 <1 <2 6 <1 0.34 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 12-Apr-11 0.35 <1 2 5 <1 0.35 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 19-Apr-11 0.41 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29
MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 26-Apr-11 0.41 <1 <2 6 <1 0.22 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 3-May-11 0.38 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 10-May-11 0.23 <1 <2 9 <1 0.36 MPR-447 117
Ave. @210 St. 17-May-11 0.19 <1 <2 8 <1 0.29 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 24-May-11 0.37 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 31-May-11 0.33 <1 2 12 <1 0.31
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 88 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 7-Jun-11 0.28 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 14-Jun-11 0.37 <1 8 11 <1 0.2 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 21-Jun-11 0.37 <1 4 11 <1 0.25
MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 28-Jun-11 0.33 <1 6 14 <1 0.24 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 5-Jul-11 0.25 <1 12 11 <1 0.29 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 12-Jul-11 0.3 <1 6 12 <1 0.2 MPR-447 117
Ave. @210 St. 19-Jul-11 0.35 <1 4 12 <1 0.2 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 26-Jul-11 0.31 <1 12 12 <1 0.27 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 3-Aug-11 0.47 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210
St. 9-Aug-11 0.34 <1 2 13 <1 0.24 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 16-Aug-11 0.31 <1 16 12 <1 0.25 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 23-Aug-11 0.31 <1 <2 15 <1 0.28 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 30-Aug-11
0.28 <1 14 14 <1 0.27 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 6-Sep-11 0.42 <1 12 13 <1 0.49 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 13-Sep-11 0.4 <1 24 13 <1 0.22 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 20-Sep-11 0.33 <1 <2
14 <1 0.08 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 27-Sep-11 0.37 <1 10 14 <1 0.2 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 4-Oct-11 0.17 <1 30 13 <1 0.29 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 11-Oct-11 0.15 <1 34 12 <1 0.3
MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 18-Oct-11 0.34 <1 20 11 <1 0.27 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 25-Oct-11 0.16 <1 18 10 <1 0.32 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 1-Nov-11 0.2 <1 16 10 <1 0.23
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 89 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 8-Nov-11 0.23 <1 6 9 <1 0.27 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 15-Nov-11 0.28 <1 <2 9 <1 1 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 22-Nov-11 0.38 <1 <2 6 <1 0.22 MPR-447
117 Ave. @210 St. 29-Nov-11 0.58 <1 <2 7 <1 0.47 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 6-Dec-11 0.6 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 13-Dec-11 0.6 <1 2 5 <1 0.26 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210
St. 20-Dec-11 0.58 <1 <2 6 <1 0.26 MPR-447 117 Ave. @210 St. 28-Dec-11 0.6 <1 NA 6 <1 0.26 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 4-Jan-11 0.51 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 11-Jan-11
0.88 <1 <2 5 <1 0.5 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 18-Jan-11 0.59 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 25-Jan-11 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.41 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 1-Feb-11 0.9 <1 <2 4
<1 0.31 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 8-Feb-11 0.6 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 15-Feb-11 0.59 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 22-Feb-11 0.52 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR-448
248th St. &McClure 1-Mar-11 0.49 <1 <2 3 <1 0.44 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 8-Mar-11 0.57 <1 <2 4 <1 0.24 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 15-Mar-11 0.6 <1 2 5 <1 0.35 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure
22-Mar-11 0.34 <1 <2 6 <1 0.36 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 23-Mar-11 0.38 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 29-Mar-11 0.43 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 90 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 5-Apr-11 0.32 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 12-Apr-11 0.32 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 19-Apr-11 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1
0.28 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 26-Apr-11 0.67 <1 <2 7 <1 0.25 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 3-May-11 0.45 <1 2 6 <1 0.33 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 10-May-11 0.72 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-448
248th St. &McClure 17-May-11 0.92 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 24-May-11 0.76 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 31-May-11 0.89 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23 MPR-448 248th
St. &McClure 7-Jun-11 0.64 <1 <2 12 <1 0.41 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 14-Jun-11 0.74 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 21-Jun-11 0.67 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure
28-Jun-11 0.56 <1 <2 15 <1 0.26 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 5-Jul-11 0.65 <1 <2 14 <1 0.22 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 12-Jul-11 0.68 <1 <2 15 <1 0.25 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 19-Jul-11
0.3 <1 <2 15 <1 0.21 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 26-Jul-11 0.43 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 3-Aug-11 0.6 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 9-Aug-11 0.49 <1
<2 14 <1 0.26 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 16-Aug-11 0.53 <1 8 14 <1 0.51 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 23-Aug-11 0.75 <1 <2 15 <1 0.26 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 30-Aug-11 0.41 <1 <2 14
<1 0.26
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 91 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL
Turbidity NTU MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 6-Sep-11 0.57 <1 <2 14 <1 0.39 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 13-Sep-11 0.45 <1 2 14 <1 0.24 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 20-Sep-11 0.45 <1 2 17 <1
0.07 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 4-Oct-11 0.53 <1 8 14 <1 0.32 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 11-Oct-11 0.73 <1 6 13 <1 0.31 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 18-Oct-11 0.39 <1 4 12 <1 0.25 MPR-448
248th St. &McClure 25-Oct-11 0.32 <1 6 11 <1 0.26 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 1-Nov-11 0.33 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 8-Nov-11 0.28 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24 MPR-448 248th St.
&McClure 15-Nov-11 0.26 <1 2 9 <1 0.28 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 22-Nov-11 0.57 <1 2 8 <1 0.35 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 29-Nov-11 0.88 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27 MPR-448 248th St. &McClure
6-Dec-11 0.55 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 13-Dec-11 0.4 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28 MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 20-Dec-11 0.49 <1 <2 6 <1 0.23 MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 28-Dec-11
0.47 <1 NA 6 <1 0.24
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 92 APPENDIX I: 2012 CAPITAL PROJECT LOCATIONS Maple Ridge West Transmission Main (by Metro Vancouver) Telep Avenue, 201B
Street to 203 Street 203 Street from Telep Avenue to Powell Avenue Abernethy Way from 224 Street to 232 Street Barnston-Maple Ridge Pump Station and associated water mains near
Lougheed and 200 Street (by Metro Vancouver) 124 Avenue, from 246 Street to 248 Street Dewdney Trunk Road from Laity Street to 216 Street River Road at 236 Street Seismic Upgrade Program
– various locations Water Security Improvements – various locations Water Main Replacement Program – various locations Additional information on construction projects is available at
www.mapleridge.ca
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 93 APPENDIX J: DRINKING WATER AND THOSE WITH WEAKENED IMMUNE SYSTEMS
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 94
District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011 95
1151 District of Maple Ridge MEMORANDUM TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: CDPR-0640-30 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer
MEETING: C.O.W. SUBJECT: FEES & CHARGES AMENDMENT – BYLAW #6932-2012 ANNUAL ADMISSIONS & FACILITY RENTAL RATE REVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The attached report, reviewed by the Maple Ridge
and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission at their meeting of May 3, 2012, is provided for background. RECOMMENDATION(S): That Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees Amending
Bylaw No. 6932-2012 be given first, second and third readings. “Original signed by Liz Holitzki” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Kelly Swift, General Manager,
Community Development Parks & Recreation Services ________________________________________________ Approved by: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer :ik Attachment – Schedules
“A”, “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, “F”, “G”, “H”, “J”, “K”, “L” and “M”
\\mr.corp\docs\CDPR-Admin\01-Admin\0540-Council-Committees\20-PLSC\02-Agendas\Regular\2012\2012-05-03\Fees_and_Charges_2013_Report.docx 1 SUBJECT: ANNUAL ADMISSIONS & FACILITY RENTAL
RATE REVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUMMARY: Staff has conducted the annual review of fees and charges to determine how Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Service fees compare
to neighbouring municipalities. The research shows that in some areas we have fallen behind and staff is recommending an increase in all areas except those that are above the average.
RECOMMENDATION: That a Fees and Charges Bylaw update be forwarded to both Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Councils b based on the proposed increase ased increases and including the introduction
of a new fee for the commercial use of tennis/sports courts and outdoor fitness equipment equipment, to be implemented January 1, 2013. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Once a year,
in February or March, staff reviews the rental and admission rates of a number of Lower Mainland recreation facilities including but not limited to: Abbotsford, Mission, Langley, Surrey,
Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, Burnaby and North Vancouver. The data gathered is used to determine current market rental and admission rates to ensure we are in line with our neighbours.
Included in this report is a document showing the average rate of comparable facilities, Parks & Leisure Services current rates, and the proposed 2013 rates (Appendix 1). Staff have
determined that drop-in admission rates for the Leisure Centre and Family Recreation Centre are below the current average and staff are recommending an increase of approximately 5%
for individual admissions which will keep rates below the market average. Although Parks & Leisure Services conducts an annual review of fees and charges that result in regular rate
increases, current rental rates for most categories are below market value. This may be due to greater than average increase to fees set in other communities that we compare to. In
this area, staff are recommending increasing rates by 7-10% which would bring them closer to current market rates. The demand for use of courts for small businesses such as tennis instruction
and boot camps has increased and staff are recommending the introduction of a rental fee of $15.00/hour per court for the commercial use of tennis/sport/fitness courts so that private
businesses that use public facilities are also contributing to operating costs. This rate was determined by taking an average of a number of municipalities that currently charge a commercial
fee for use of courts. The booking of these facilities will follow the Parks & Leisure Services booking allocation policy, approved by Commission in April 2011 which gives priority
use to: Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission Report REGULAR MEETING May 3, 2012
\\mr.corp\docs\CDPR-Admin\01-Admin\0540-Council-Committees\20-PLSC\02-Agendas\Regular\2012\2012-05-03\Fees_and_Charges_2013_Report.docx 2 • Parks & Leisure Services programs, events
and services • School District No. 42 • Non-profit community groups • Local, private or political groups • Local, commercial groups • Non-resident groups In addition to regular fee
reviews Commission also maintains a commitment to providing barrier free access to our residents. This is evident in our low cost recreation program options, recreation access program
and our work with community programs such as KidSport, Canadian Tire Jumpstart and School District No. 42’s Tzu Chi bursaries. These programs provide Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows residents,
living below the low income threshold, with access to recreation facilities and programs free or at a reduced rate. Commission also waives rental fees equivalent to registration fees
by minor sport organizations for children and youth who need financial assistance to participate. In addition, Commission recently endorsed the Grade 5 Active Pass initiative that will
enable all Maple Ridge students in Grade 5 unlimited access to drop-in programs at the Leisure Centre, Family Recreation Centre and Greg Moore Youth Centre. These programs will continue
in 2013 with the full support of Parks & Leisure Services staff. a) Desired Outcome: That fees assist in offsetting facility operating costs, while balancing the need to ensure Parks
& Leisure Services remain accessible to all residents. b) Strategic Alignment: Financial Management Provide citizens with quality services in a cost effective and efficient manner.
c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Customers who visit the Leisure Centre will see an increase to drop-in admission rates of 5% equating to an average of .19 cents per visit for an individual
and .47 cents for a family. Customers who visit the Family Recreation Centre will see an increase to drop-in admission rates of 5% equating to an average of .17 cents per visit for
an individual and .33 cents for a family. User groups have been notified that the Fees and Charges Bylaw is under annual review and are cognizant that an increase will be introduced
in January 2013. Staff will inform user groups of increase rates as soon as Commission and both Councils approve them so they may work this into 2013 budgets and registration fees.
d) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Commission’s practice is to review Parks & Leisure Services fees and charges annually and to plan regular, modest increases that reflect average
market rates for comparable services to avoid significant impact to user groups. e) Alternatives: To stay with the minimum CPI (2.3%) increase across the board.
\\mr.corp\docs\CDPR-Admin\01-Admin\0540-Council-Committees\20-PLSC\02-Agendas\Regular\2012\2012-05-03\Fees_and_Charges_2013_Report.docx 3 CONCLUSION: Serving Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows
with well used and well maintained facilities by conducting an annual review of fees and charges, allows Parks & Leisure Services to keep services accessible to residents while contributing
to service and facility operating costs. Prepared By: Danielle Pope Manager, Business Operations Approved By: Wendy McCormick Director Recreation Approved By: Kelly Swift General Manager,
Community Development Parks & Recreation Services :dp Attachment
* all fees may be adjusted lightly due to rounding formulas CPI INCREASES (2.3%) Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Youth Non-Profit 98.18 102.05 100.99 $ Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 125.59 243.44 128.71 $ Below market average Youth Non-Profit 38.31 39.06 39.74 $ Below market average Adult Non-Profit 59.07 76.47 60.66 $ Below market average 5% INCREASES
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Child 2.76 3.16 2.90 $ Below market average Student 3.53 4.15 3.71 $ Below market average Adult 5.43 5.74 5.70 $ Below market average
Senior 3.53 4.29 3.71 $ Below market average Family 9.47 11.73 9.94 $ Below market average Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Child 2.36 3.00 2.48 $ Below market average
Student 3.05 3.69 3.20 $ Below market average Adult 4.78 5.31 5.02 $ Below market average Senior 3.05 3.99 3.20 $ Below market average CURRENT FEES, PROPOSED FEES & AVERAGE FEES ANALYSIS
MRLC Admissions Ice Rentals PMFRC Admissions Dry Floor Rentals Family 8.93 n/a 9.38 $ Below market average Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Child 1.52 2.14 1.60 $ Below
market average Student 2.26 2.68 2.37 $ Below market average Adult 2.89 3.71 3.03 $ Below market average Senior 2.26 2.84 2.37 $ Below market average Family 5.78 8.21 6.07 $ Below market
average Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Child 2.48 2.70 2.60 $ Below market average Student 3.03 3.54 3.18 $ Below market average Adult 4.29 5 4.50 $ Below market average
Senior 3.03 4 3.18 $ Below market average Family 7.21 10.7 7.57 $ Below market average Parent & Tot 3.58 5.35 3.76 $ Below market average Outdoor Pools Skating Admissions
7% INCREASES Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Youth Non-Profit 45.62 49.68 50.48 $ Below market average Adult Non-Profit 67.19 70.83 72.59 $ Below market average Private
Groups 77.19 114.37 82.59 $ Below market average Commercial 84.91 147.33 90.85 $ Below market average Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Youth Non-Profit 107.76 219.65
116.69 $ Below market average Adult Non-Profit 122.63 219.65 131.56 $ Below market average Private Groups 159.56 219.65 170.70 $ Below market average Commercial 172.3 219.65 184.36
$ Below market average Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Youth Non-Profit 24.04 30.90 27.39 $ Below market average Adult Non-Profit 43.21 36.52 46.93 $ Below market average
Private Groups 53.21 73.22 56.93 $ Below market average Commercial 58.53 87.90 62.62 $ Below market average Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason No comparable facilities
Greg Moore Youth Centre -Active Area Medium Hall (Hammond 100-120) Specialized Hall (up to 200) (special event rate) Gymnasium -Full Sized Youth Non-Profit 38.31 42.66 $ Below market
average Adult Non-Profit 59.07 63.90 $ Below market average Private Groups 69.07 73.90 $ Below market average Commercial 75.98 81.29 $ Below market average Category PLS Current Average
PLS Propose Reason Youth Non-Profit 0.00 -$ Below market average Adult Non-Profit 13.03 14.64 $ Below market average Private Groups 23.03 24.64 $ Below market average Commercial 25.33
27.10 $ Below market average Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Youth Non-Profit 0.00 -$ Below market average Adult Non-Profit 6.46 6.91 $ Below market average Private
Groups 16.46 17.61 $ Below market average Commercial 18.11 19.37 $ Below market average No comparable facilities No comparable facilities Greg Moore Youth Centre -Multi-Purpose Greg
Moore Youth Centre -Lounge
10% INCREASES Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Youth Non-Profit 27.70 37.03 32.86 $ Below market average Adult Non-Profit 47.28 56.16 53.01 $ Below market average Private
Groups 57.28 90.47 63.01 $ Below market average Commercial 63.01 110.06 69.31 $ Below market average Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Youth Non Profit (reg)/Swim Club
31.86 64.70 35.04 $ Adult Non Profit (reg) 69.24 88.41 76.14 $ Private (reg) 77.16 138.53 84.90 $ Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Youth Non Profit (reg)/Swim Club 5.31
10.79 5.84 $ Adult Non Profit (reg) 11.54 14.74 12.69 $ Private (reg) 12.86 20.11 14.15 $ Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Large Meeting Room (Fraser 80-100) Per Lane
As recommended in 2011 report, 10% increase per year until market average is attained. As recommended in 2011 report, 10% increase per year until market average is attained. Indoor
Pool Large Hall (Heritage 200-300) Youth Non-Profit 0.00 20.71 -$ Below market average Adult Non-Profit 8.82 27.29 12.77 $ Below market average Private Groups 18.82 48.01 22.77 $ Below
market average Commercial 20.70 62.19 25.05 $ Below market average Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason Youth Non-Profit 0.00 10.87 -$ Below market average Adult Non-Profit
0.00 16.35 -$ Below market average Private Groups 10.86 21.56 11.95 $ Below market average Commercial 11.95 24.77 13.15 $ Below market average Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose
Reason Youth Non-Profit 0.00 9.02 -$ Below market average Adult Non-Profit 0.00 13.38 -$ Below market average Private Groups 13.09 21.56 14.40 $ Below market average Commercial 14.40
24.27 15.84 $ Below market average Small Meeting Room (Alouette 20) Medium Meeting Room (Art Workshop 60)
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 6932-2012 A Bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 as amended. ________________________________________________
__________ WHEREAS the Council may by bylaw establish and regulate the fixing of fees for admissions and/or use of sports, recreation and community use facilities; AND WHEREAS, the Council
has imposed fees and now wishes to amend those fees; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge Recreation
Facility Fees Amending Bylaw No. 6932-2012. 2. That Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees By-law No. 4117 -1988 as amended, be further amended by deleting Schedules “A”, “B”, “C”, “D”,
“E”, “F”, “G”, “H”, “J”, “K”, “L” and “M” in their entirety and replacing with Schedule “A”, “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, “F”, “G” “H”, “J”, “K”, “L” and “M” as attached hereto. 3. This Bylaw
shall come into force and effect as of January 1, 2013 for Schedules “A”, “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, “F”, “G”, “H”, “J”, “K”, “L” and “M”. READ a first time the READ a second time the READ
a third time the ADOPTED this ________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER ________________________ CORPORATE OFFICER Attachments: Schedules “A”, “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, “F”, “H”, “J”, “K”,
“L” and “M”.
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “A” Arenas Effective January 1, 2013 taxes extra Ice Ice Ice Dry Floor Planet Ice Prime Non-Prime Early Bird
Mtg Room Youth/Senior Non Profit Commercial Use $138.71 $110.97 $70.66 $14.40 Fundraising $125.46 $97.72 $57.41 $7.20 Special Event $118.84 $91.10 $91.10 $50.79 $3.60 Regular Use $100.99
$76.02 $76.02 $39.74 $0.00 Adult Non Profit Commercial Use $138.71 $110.97 $70.66 $14.40 Fundraising $138.71 $110.97 $70.66 $14.40 Special Event $133.71 $105.97 $105.97 $65.66 $7.20
Regular Use $128.71 $100.97 $100.97 $60.66 $0.00 Local, Private or Political Groups Fundraising $193.16 $156.13 $105.99 $21.60 Special Event $185.84 $148.85 $88.32 $18.00 Regular Use
$197.88 $143.72 $70.66 $14.40 Local Commercial Fundraising $305.27 $235.64 $113.05 $23.04 Special Event $254.24 $203.88 $95.39 $19.44 Regular Use $209.87 $161.99 $77.72 $15.84 Non Resident
Groups Fundraising $307.07 $245.66 $120.12 $24.48 Special Event $263.21 $210.56 $102.45 $20.88 Regular Use $215.88 $172.70 $84.79 $17.28
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “B” Fairgrounds Effective January 1, 2013 taxes extra Commercial or Beef Stage Grounds & Exhibition Barn Showrings
Youth/Senior Non Profit Commercial Use $20.40 $30.58 $5.09 $17.85 Fundraising $10.20 $17.33 $2.55 $8.93 Special Event $5.10 $10.71 $1.27 $4.46 Regular Use $0.00 $3.67 $0.00 $0.00 Adult
Non Profit Commercial Use $20.40 $30.58 $5.09 $17.85 Fundraising $20.40 $30.58 $5.09 $17.85 Special Event $15.40 $25.58 $2.55 $12.85 Regular Use $10.40 $20.58 $0.00 $7.85 Local, Private
or Political Groups Fundraising $30.60 $45.87 $7.64 $26.78 Special Event $25.50 $38.22 $6.37 $22.31 Regular Use $20.40 $30.58 $5.09 $17.85 Local Commercial Fundraising $32.64 $48.92
$8.15 $28.56 Special Event $27.54 $41.28 $6.88 $24.10 Regular Use $22.44 $33.64 $5.60 $19.64 Non Resident Groups Fundraising $34.68 $51.98 $8.66 $30.35 Special Event $29.58 $44.34 $7.39
$25.88 Regular Use $24.48 $36.69 $6.11 $21.42
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “C” Maple Ridge Leisure Centre Pool Rates Effective January 1, 2013 taxes extra Leisure Pool/Competition Pool
Hammond Pool Per Lane Full Pool Youth/Senior Non Profit Commercial Use $14.15 $61.02 Fundraising $10.32 $42.23 Special Event $8.38 $32.79 Regular Use $5.84 $21.08 Adult Non Profit Commercial
Use $14.15 $61.02 Fundraising $14.15 $61.02 Special Event $13.86 $53.91 Regular Use $12.69 $46.83 Local, Private or Political Groups Fundraising $21.19 $91.51 Special Event $17.67 $76.26
Regular Use $14.15 $61.02 Local Commercial Fundraising $22.63 $97.64 Special Event $19.10 $82.38 Regular Use $15.52 $67.12 Non Resident Groups Fundraising $24.02 $103.73 Special Event
$20.49 $88.47 Regular Use $16.96 $73.22 Lifeguard Fees are extra.
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “D” Maple Ridge Leisure Centre Effective January 1, 2013 taxes extra Full Gym Half Gym 1/4 Gym (Multi-P) Preschool
Cap. 1000 Cap. 500 Cap. 80 Cap. 40 Youth/Senior Non Profit Commercial Use $82.59 $41.30 $20.65 $11.01 Fundraising $69.34 $34.67 $17.34 $5.51 Special Event $62.72 $31.36 $15.68 $2.75
Regular Use $50.48 $25.24 $12.62 $0.00 Adult Non Profit Commercial Use $82.59 $41.30 $20.65 $11.01 Fundraising $82.59 $41.30 $20.65 $11.01 Special Event $77.59 $38.80 $19.40 $5.51 Regular
Use $72.59 $36.30 $18.15 $0.00 Local, Private or Political Groups Fundraising $123.89 $61.94 $30.97 $16.52 Special Event $103.24 $51.62 $25.81 $13.76 Regular Use $82.59 $41.30 $20.65
$11.01 Local Commercial Fundraising $132.15 $66.07 $33.04 $17.62 Special Event $111.50 $55.75 $27.88 $14.86 Regular Use $90.85 $45.43 $22.71 $12.11 Non Resident Groups Fundraising $140.41
$70.20 $35.10 $18.72 Special Event $119.76 $59.88 $29.94 $15.97 Regular Use $99.11 $49.56 $24.78 $13.21
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “E” Maple Ridge Library Meeting Rooms Effective January 1, 2013 taxes extra Alouette Room Fraser Room Youth/Senior
Non Profit Commercial Use $14.40 $20.70 Fundraising $7.20 $10.35 Special Event $3.60 $5.18 Regular Use $0.00 $0.00 Adult Non Profit Commercial Use $14.40 $20.70 Fundraising $14.40 $20.70
Special Event $7.20 $15.70 Regular Use $0.00 $10.70 Local, Private or Political Groups Fundraising $21.60 $31.05 Special Event $18.00 $25.88 Regular Use $14.40 $20.70 Local Commercial
Fundraising $23.04 $33.12 Special Event $19.44 $27.95 Regular Use $15.84 $22.77 Non Resident Groups Fundraising $24.48 $35.19 Special Event $20.88 $30.02 Regular Use $17.28 $24.84
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “F” Maple Ridge Leisure Centre Admission Rates Effective January 1, 2013 "Flexi" taxes extra single 10 visits
20 visits 1 month 3 months 6 months 1 year Children $2.90 $ 24.90 $ 44.20 $ 27.60 $ 70.38 $ 132.48 $ 264.96 Youth $3.71 $ 31.80 $ 56.50 $ 35.30 $ 90.02 $ 169.44 $ 338.88 Senior $3.71
$ 31.80 $ 56.50 $ 35.30 $ 90.02 $ 169.44 $ 338.88 Adult $5.70 $ 48.90 $ 86.90 $ 54.30 $ 138.47 $ 260.64 $ 521.28 Family $9.94 $ 85.30 $ 151.60 $ 94.70 $ 241.49 $ 454.56 $ 909.12
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “G” Sports Fields Municipal & School District 42 Effective January 1, 2013 taxes extra CLASS A CLASS B CLASS
C Youth/Senior Non Profit Commercial Use 22.07 16.44 5.49 Fundraising 11.04 8.22 2.75 Special Event 5.52 4.11 1.37 Regular Use 0.00 0.00 0.00 Adult Non Profit Commercial Use 22.07 16.44
5.49 Fundraising 22.07 16.44 5.49 Special Event $17.07 $11.44 2.75 Regular Use $12.70 $6.65 0.00 Local, Private or Political Groups Fundraising 33.11 24.66 8.24 Special Event 27.59
20.55 6.86 Regular Use 22.07 16.44 5.49 Local Commercial Fundraising 35.31 26.30 8.78 Special Event 29.79 22.19 7.41 Regular Use 24.28 18.08 6.04 Non Resident Groups Fundraising 37.52
27.95 9.33 Special Event 32.00 23.84 7.96 Regular Use 26.48 19.73 6.59
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “H” Drop In Skating Admission Rates Effective January 1, 2013 Pitt Meadows Arenas and Planet Ice Arena taxes
extra single 10 visits 20 visits Children $2.60 $ 22.40 $ 39.70 Youth $3.18 $ 27.30 $ 48.50 Senior $3.18 $ 27.30 $ 48.50 Adult $4.50 $ 38.70 $ 68.70 Family $7.57 $ 64.90 $ 115.40 Parent/Tot
$3.76 $ 32.30 $ 57.30 (Adult + child under 3)
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “I” SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD FEES AND CHARGES Effective January 1, 2013 taxes extra Samuel Robertson Sports Field
(per player, annually) Youth $10.00 Adult $20.00
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “J” Greg Moore Youth Centre Effective January 1, 2013 taxes extra Multi-Purpose Lounge Inside Active Area Whole
Facility Youth/Senior Non Profit Commercial Use $17.61 $24.64 $73.90 $116.16 Fundraising $8.81 $12.32 $60.65 $81.78 Special Event $4.40 $6.16 $54.03 $64.60 Regular Use $0.00 $0.00 $42.66
$42.66 Adult Non Profit Commercial Use $17.61 $24.64 $73.90 $116.16 Fundraising $17.61 $24.64 $73.90 $116.16 Special Event $12.61 $19.64 $68.90 $101.16 Regular Use $7.61 $14.64 $63.90
$86.16 Local, Private or Political Groups Fundraising $26.42 $36.96 $110.86 $174.24 Special Event $22.02 $30.80 $92.38 $145.20 Regular Use $17.61 $24.64 $73.90 $116.16 Local Commercial
Fundraising $28.18 $39.43 $118.25 $185.85 Special Event $23.78 $33.27 $99.77 $156.81 Regular Use $19.37 $27.11 $81.30 $127.78 Non Resident Groups Fundraising $29.94 $41.89 $125.64 $197.47
Special Event $25.54 $35.73 $107.16 $168.43 Regular Use $21.13 $29.57 $88.69 $139.39
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “K” Hammond Community Centre Effective January 1, 2013 taxes extra Large Hall 1/2 Large Hall Small Hall (Preschool
Rm) Youth/Senior Non Profit Commercial Use $56.93 $28.47 $23.45 Fundraising $43.68 $21.84 $11.73 Special Event $37.06 $18.53 $5.86 Regular Use $27.39 $13.70 $0.00 Adult Non Profit Commercial
Use $56.93 $28.47 $23.45 Fundraising $56.93 $28.47 $23.45 Special Event $51.93 $25.97 $18.45 Regular Use $46.93 $23.47 $13.45 Local, Private or Political Groups Fundraising $85.40 $42.70
$35.18 Special Event $71.17 $35.58 $29.32 Regular Use $56.93 $28.47 $23.45 Local Commercial Fundraising $91.10 $45.55 $37.52 Special Event $76.86 $38.43 $31.66 Regular Use $62.63 $31.31
$25.80 Non Resident Groups Fundraising $96.79 $48.39 $39.87 Special Event $82.56 $41.28 $34.01 Regular Use $68.32 $34.16 $28.14
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “L” Park Shelter Fees Effective January 1, 2013 taxes extra Park Shelter Rental $ 63.00 (Up to a full day) Equipment
Fee Effective July 1, 2013 taxes extra Event Trailer $ 147.31 Tennis/Sport Court Effective January 1, 2013 taxes extra Courts (commercial use per hour) $ 15.00
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 SCHEDULE “M” Outdoor Pool Admissions Effective January 1, 2013 Hammond Pool taxes extra single Season Pass Children $1.60
$ 36.23 Youth $2.37 $ 39.85 Senior $2.37 $ 39.85 Adult $3.03 $ 44.63 Family $6.07 $ 98.86 Replacement Pass $5.00