HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-06-18 Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfCommittee of the Whole Agenda June 18, 2012
District of Maple Ridge Note: If required, there will be a 15-minute break at 3:00 p.m. Chair: Acting Mayor 1. DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS – (10 minutes each) 1:00 p.m. 1.1 Maple
Ridge Economic Advisory Commission Presentation Glenn Ralph, Chair, Economic Advisory Commission Sandy Blue, Manager of Strategic Economic Initiatives 1.2 Street Trees Presentation
Bruce McLeod, Manager of Park Planning and Development 2. PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda:
1101 2012-054-RZ, 23274 Silver Valley Road, RS-3 to RS-1b and RS-1 Staff report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6936-2012 to permit a subdivision
of 8 lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along
with the information required for a Subdivision application. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA June 18, 2012 1:00 p.m. Council Chamber Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review
of issues. No voting takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more information or
clarification before proceeding to Council. Note: Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications may be permitted to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes.
Committee of the Whole Agenda June 18, 2012 Page 2 of 5 1102 2011-055-RZ, 11461 and 11475 236 Street, RS-3 to RM-1 Staff report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6832-2011 to adjust designated conservation areas be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending
Bylaw No. 6833-2011 to permit a 53 unit townhouse development be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1103 2011-066-RZ, 26777 Dewdney Trunk Road, RS-3 to RS-2 Staff
report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6934-2012 to amend a conservation designation be given first and second reading and
be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6841-2011 to permit subdivision into two lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
1104 2011-050-RZ, 21165 River Road, RS-1 to RS-1b Staff report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6846-2011 to permit a subdivision into seven
lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1105 2011-054-RZ, 22327 River Road and Roll #31399-0000-4, RS-1 to CRM Staff report dated June 18, 2012 recommending
that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6827-2011 to permit future construction of a four-storey apartment building with 43 units be given second reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing. 1106 2012-005-RZ, 20528 Lougheed Highway, CS-1 to C-2 Staff report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6926-2012 to permit an existing
commercial building to be expanded and allow a broader range of commercial uses be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Report to be circulated separately 1107 2012-027-DVP,
24207 102 Avenue Staff report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-027-DVP to vary road widths and construction standards,
minimum lot depth on lots fronting 102 Avenue and reduction of side yard setbacks.
Committee of the Whole Agenda June 18, 2012 Page 3 of 5 1108 2012-027-DP, 24207 102 Avenue Staff report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign
and seal 2012-027-DP to permit development of 27 lots under the R-3 zone. 1109 Local Area Service – 11160 234A Street Paving Staff report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that staff
be authorized to prepare a bylaw to establish a Local Area Service for 11160 234A Street. 1110 Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 151/12, 124 Avenue and 203 Street Staff
report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 151/12. 1111 Award of Contract No. ITT-EN12-55,
122 Avenue Road and Walkability Improvements (216 Street to 222 Street) Staff report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that Contract No. ITT-EN12-55, 122 Avenue Road Improvements (216
Street to 222 Street) be awarded to Imperial Paving Limited and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 1112 Lava Room Dining and Lounge – Liquor License Application
– Entertainment Endorsement Staff report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that Council decline comment on the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch Application for a minor amendment to
include Patron Participation Entertainment at the Lava Room Dining and Lounge. 3. FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERVICES (including Fire and Police) 1131 2011 Annual Report and 2011 Statement
of Financial Information Staff report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that the 2011 Annual Report be received and that the 2011 Statement of Financial Information be approved.
Committee of the Whole Agenda June 18, 2012 Page 4 of 5 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERVICES 1151 Cedar Park Construction – Award of Tender Staff report dated June 18, 2012
recommending that the contract for the construction of Cedar Park be awarded to Wilco Civil Inc. and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the agreement. 1152 Deer Fern
Park Construction – Award of Tender Staff report dated June 18, 2012 recommending that the contract for the construction of Deer Fern Park be awarded to Wilco Civil Inc. and that the
Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the agreement. 5. CORRESPONDENCE 1171 6. OTHER ISSUES 1181 Town Centre Incentive Program Partnering Agreements Staff report dated June 18,
2012 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute Partnering Agreements for Building Permit Numbers 11-120295, 12-109255 and 11-124858, 11-110037 and 12-112565 to
provide an upfront financial incentive as part of the Town Centre Investment Incentive Program. 7. ADJOURNMENT
Committee of the Whole Agenda June 18, 2012 Page 5 of 5 8. COMMUNITY FORUM Checked by:: ““Orriigiinall siigned by C.. Marrllo”” Datte:: 2012/06/14_ COMMUNITY FORUM The Community Forum
provides the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second opportunity is permitted
if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the individual members of Council. The total time
for this Forum is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a response will be given. Other opportunities are available to address
Council including public hearings and delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information
meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk’s Department
at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-054-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6936-2012 23274 Silver Valley Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential). To proceed further with this application additional
information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of
an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is
located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality
that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments
and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community
Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; That Zone Amending Bylaw 6936-2012 be given First Reading; and; That the applicant
provide further information as described on Schedules A, C, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 – 1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application.
1101
-2 -DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Damax Consultants Ltd. David Laird Owner: 0752504 B C Ltd. Legal Description: Lot: 3, Section 33, Township 12, Plan: 20132 OCP: Existing:
Medium Density Residential, Low/Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential, Open Space and Conservation. Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-1b
(One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential), RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential and Conservation South: Use:
Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Medium Density Residential, Low/Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential and Conservation
East: Use: Conservation Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Conservation West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation:
Medium Density Residential and Low/Medium Density Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: 0.936
HA. (2.3 acres) Access: Silver Valley Road and Blaney Road from the North Servicing requirement: Full Urban Standard b) Site Characteristics: The site is 0.936 ha in size and is bounded
by Silver Valley Road to the west and the North Alouette River to the east. The site slopes steeply down to the east forming part of the North Alouette river valley. Approximately one-third
of the site will be dedicated to the District as Park under the
-3 -Conservation designation of the OCP for the preservation of the hillside and the North Alouette riparian area. The development site is within the Blaney Hamlet of the Silver Valley
Area Plan which forms part of the Official Community Plan. c) Project Description: The applicant is requesting rezoning of the site under the RS-1b (One Family (Medium Density) Residential
Zone on the west portion, and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) on the eastern portion, the area required to habitat protection of the North Alouette River will remain under the present
zoning. This would permit a future subdivision of the property into approximately six RS-1b (One Family(Medium Density) Residential) lots, not less than 557 m2 and two RS-1 (One Family
Urban Residential) Lots, not less than 668 m2. A large portion will be dedicated to the District as Park under the Conservation designation of the OCP for the preservation of the hillside
and the North Alouette riparian area. Access will be from Silver Valley Road and from Blaney Road which abuts the north portion of the site. At this time the current application has
been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application
packages have been received and reviewed by staff. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, may require
application for further development permits. A detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development
site is within the Blaney Hamlet of the Silver Valley Area Plan which forms part of the Official Community Plan. The subject property has multiple land-use designations: Conservation,
Low Density Urban, Low/Medium Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Open Space. For the proposed development an Official Community Plan amendment may be required to redesignate
a portion of the site to Conservation and realign the residential boundary to allow the proposed zoning to proceed. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property
located at 23274 Silver Valley Road from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to permit
the furture subdivision into approximately seven lots. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development
Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration
and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas.
-4 -Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity to ensure the
preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement for the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions for; All areas designated Conservation
on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver Valley Area Plan; All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent; All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural
Features Schedule “C” to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information
Meeting is not required for this application. e) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Parks Department; e) School District;
f) Building Department The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed
above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We
anticipate that this evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading. f) Early and Ongoing Consultation: In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation
during an Official Community Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District’s
website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. g) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required
by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 – 1999 as amended: 1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); 3. Watercourse Protection
Development Permit Application (Schedule F);
-5 -4. Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G); 5. Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary
as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the policies of the Official Community Plan. It is, therefore, recommended that
Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. It is recommended that Council not require any further additional
OCP consultation. It is expected that once complete information is received, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6936-2012 may be amended and an Official Community Plan Amendment for
Conservation boundary adjustment may be required. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any
subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge’s Approving Officer. _______________________________________________ Prepared
by: Gay McMillan Planning Technician _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning _______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services _______________________________________________ Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer
GM/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Zone Amending Bylaw 6936-2012 Appendix C – Area Context Plan Appendix D -subdivision geometry
"Original signed by Christine Carter" "Original signed by Frank Quinn" "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" "Original signed by Gay McMillan"
City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley District of Mission FRASER R. ^ DATE: May 8, 2012 FILE: 2012-054-RZ BY: PC 23274 SILVER VALLEY ROAD CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 13660 13805 13772 13782 23262 13860 13802 13751 13812 13828 13776 13796 13673/91 13880 13702 13792 13757 13811 13825 13841 13802 13762 13616 13831 23250 23274 13765
13762 13772 13887 13782 13738 13857 13782 13848 13856 13771 13762 13862 13773 13793 13750 13795 13653 13855 13822 13842 13763 13868 13852 13752 13781 13795 13753 13783 ROAD 232 ST.
BLANEY RD SILVER VALLEY RD SILVER VALLEY RD 232A ST. A BCP 46658 1 1 7 15 BCP 46698 RP 10274 P 20132 2 11 S PART 9 8 16 8 N 200' 9 14 12 PARK 3 Rem Pcl B 53 45 Rem 1 6 BCP 46658 19
5 6 2 2 BCP 42823 BCP 46658 4 P 2409 13 11 PARK 3 10 17 22 P 20132 3 3 2 13 12 147 5 21 4 9 10 PARK *PP162 15BCP 46698 BCP 42873 4 BCP 42873 EP 4248 BCS 3588 321 1 9 1 18 20 P 20132
8 P 2409 P 13776 !(!(!(!( !( SUBJECT PROPERTY SCALE 1:2,500 APPENDIX A ´
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6936-2012 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended ________________________________________________________
___ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge,
in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6936-2012." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described
as: Lot 3 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 20132 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1573 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw,
is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A"
attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a
third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX B
13863 13660 13805 13772 13782 23262 13859 13860 13802 13751 13812 13828 13776 13796 13673/91 13702 13792 13757 13811 13825 13841 13802 13762 13831 23250 23274 13765 13762 13772 13887
13782 13851 13738 13857 13782 13848 13856 13771 13762 13862 13773 13793 13750 13795 23196 13653 13855 13822 13842 13763 13868 13855 13852 13752 13781 13795 13753 13783 232 ST. BLANEY
RD SILVER VALLEY RD SILVER VALLEY RD 232A ST. A BCP 46658 1 7 15 BCP 46698 RP 10274 P 20132 2 11 16 8 N 200' 9 8 14 12 PARK 3 Rem Pcl B 53 45 Rem 1 6 BCP 46658 19 5 6 2 2 BCP 42823
RP 17234 4 P 2409 13 11 BCP 41713 3 10 17 22 P 20132 3 3 2 12 13 147 5 21 4 9 10 PARK *PP162 15 BCP 42873 4 BCP 42873 EP 4248 P 18410 1 BCS 3588 32 9 1 18 20 P 20132 8 P 2409 P 13776
BCP 33245 BCP 4282 9 BCP 42874 BCP 33247 BCP 42875 RW 68113 BCP 46660 BCP 42876 BCP 33246 BCP 46699 BCP 48823 BCP 42874 BCP 33248 BCP 33246 BCP 41108 SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE
AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) 6936-2012 1573 ´
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-055-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6832-2011 Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6833-2011 11461 and 11475 236 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject properties from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). The proposed RM-1 (Townhouse
Residential) zoning is consistent with the Major Corridor Residential development policies of the Urban Residential land use designation in the Official Community Plan. An Official
Community Plan amendment is required to adjust the area designated Conservation on the south and west edges of the development area. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Maple Ridge Official Community
Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6832-2011 be given First and Second Readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity
for early and on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6832-2011 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant
host a Development Information Meeting, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a public hearing on the bylaw;
3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6832-2011 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That it be confirmed
that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6832-2011 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6833-2011
be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 1102
-2 -6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading. i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of
a security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Amendment to Schedules "B" and “C” of the Official Community Plan; iii. Registration of a Geotechnical Report as a Restrictive Covenant
which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iv. Road dedication as required; v. Park dedication as required; vi. Consolidation of the development site;
vii. Removal of the existing buildings; viii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage
tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations. ix. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting
the Visitor Parking. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Focus Architecture Inc. Owner: Florence L Nicholson Legal Description: Parcel “A” (ex plan 16722), Lot 4, Section
16, Township 12, NWD Plan 7289; and Lot 10, Section 16, Township 12, NWD Plan 21065 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential, Conservation Proposed: Urban Residential, Conservation Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
-3 -Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Townhouse Residential, Park Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential), RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation Urban Residential, Conservation South:
Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Urban Residential, Conservation East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban
(Medium Density) Residential), CD-1-93 Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Vacant Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Conservation Existing Use of Property:
Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Townhouse Residential Site Area: 2.807 ha (6.9 ac). Access: 236 Street Servicing requirement: Urban Standard Companion Applications:
2011-055-DP, 2011-055-VP, 2011-123-DP b) Project Description: The development site is located on the west side of 236 Street just north of 114A Avenue, and it is comprised of 2 large
lots with a total area of 2.8 hectares (6.9 acres). The eastern portion of the property has a developable area that is relatively flat. The western portion of the property has some
steep slopes, some exceeding 25%, and watercourses that are part of the Cottonwood Creek system. The geotechnical and environmental assessments have established the requirements and
setbacks for protection of these features. There is an existing strata development to the north, and the property north of that is under application for a townhouse development (RZ/022/10).
The property to the south of this site is an existing large singe family residential lot with potential for redevelopment in the future. The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject
site from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit a townhouse development of approximately 53 units on the developable portion of the site. The
remainder of the site will be dedicated as Park for the protection of the slopes and watercourse areas. Running concurrently with this application are a Multi-Family Development Permit,
a Watercourse Protection and Natural Features Development Permit, and a Development Variance Permit.
-4 -c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The property is designated Urban Residential and Conservation. The proposed RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zoning is consistent with
Major Corridor Residential Policies 3-18, 3-20 and 3-21 for development on a major corridor. An Official Community Plan amendment is required to adjust the boundaries of the area designated
Conservation on the south and west edges of the development area. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 11461 and 11475 236 Street from RS-3
(One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit the construction of a townhouse development. A preliminary review of the plans in relation to the Zoning Bylaw
requirements has revealed that the proposal generally complies with the bylaw, although a number of variances would be required if this proposal is to proceed. Proposed Variances: This
application will require four variances that will be subject of a future Council report. The variances are: 1. To allow the existing above-ground utility company plant on 236 Street
to remain; 2. To reduce the front setbacks on 236 Street from 7.5 metres to approximately 5.8 metres; 3. To vary the maximum building height on some of the buildings from 10.5 metres
to approximately 11.0 metres. 4. To allow developer-built retaining walls to exceed the maximum height of 1.2 metres, as required. Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: The development
proposal for 53 units requires 2 parking spaces be provided for each unit and 0.2 spaces per unit be provided as Visitor Parking spaces, for a total of 106 residential parking spaces
and 11 visitor parking spaces. A preliminary review of the plans in relation to the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw requirements has revealed that the proposal complies with the
bylaw. The applicant has provided the minimum required number of parking spaces on the site, with approximately 45% of the required residential parking as tandem garage spaces, and
the remainder as double garage spaces. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to address
the form and character of the proposed dwellings and to ensure the current proposal enhances the existing neighbourhood with a compatible housing style and that minimizes potential
conflicts with neighbouring land uses. The development will be assessed against the following Key Design concepts, which will be the subject of a future Council report:
-5 -1. New development into established areas should respect private spaces, and incorporate local neighbourhood elements in building form, height, architectural features and massing.
2. Transitional development should be used to bridge areas of low and high densities, through means such as stepped building heights, or low rise ground oriented housing located to
the periphery of a higher density developments. 3. Large scale developments should be clustered and given architectural separation to foster a sense of community, and improve visual
attractiveness. 4. Pedestrian circulation should be encouraged with attractive streetscapes attained through landscaping, architectural details, appropriate lighting and by directing
parking underground where possible or away from public view through screened parking structures or surface parking located to the rear of the property. Pursuant to Sections 8.9 and
8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection and Natural Features Development Permit application has been received to ensure the preservation, protection of the natural
environment of Cottonwood Creek, its tributaries, and the adjacent slopes. The developer will provide restoration, enhancement and replanting works as required, and a Security will
be taken as a condition of the issuance of the Development Permit to ensure that the Development Permit Area guidelines are met. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information
Meeting was held on April 2, 2012 at Thomas Haney Secondary School. There was a very small turn-out (2) at the meeting and the following information was provided in the meeting minutes
from the applicant: The residents of the strata development to the north were concerned about: o increased noise due to the loss of tree cover on the development site; and o loss
of privacy and the impact on the usability of their rear yards. The applicant explained that any increased noise to the neighbouring development may be somewhat offset by the buildings
being erected in place of the trees, and further noted that more open spaces results in an increase in the ability for sound to travel. Regarding the privacy concerns, the applicant
noted that they will install fencing along the property line, and a cedar hedge to increase the privacy for the neighbours to the immediate north.
-6 -Advisory Design Panel: The plans, design drawings and landscape plans submitted in support of the Development Permit application were reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel at the
Advisory Design Panel (ADP) on May 8, 2012. The ADP generally supported the application and resolved that the following concerns be addressed. Revisions have been reviewed by Planning
staff and found acceptable, as noted (in italics): Consider a dedicated pedestrian walkway from 236 Street with a pedestrian gate; o The applicant has provided a walkway on the north
side of the driveway. Realign the northeast portion of the roadway to allow street trees to be behind Building 1; o Mixed landscaping has been added between the unit driveways to
the rear of Building 1. Look at the cultured stone treatment on the end elevations of Buildings 3, 5, 7 and 12; o Cultured stone treatment has been extended around to the end elevations
of units 3 and 12, and significant landscaping is provided between units 5 and 7. Consider pedestrian connection to the property to the north; o The applicant reviewed the connection
options and determined that the opportunity should be explored between the strata owners. Consider pedestrian crosswalks at the entry, the child’s play area and the pathway to the
west; o The applicant has provided the crossings as required; Consider carrying the cultured stone down to grade on the retaining wall at the entry elevations on 236 Street; o The
applicant has met this requirement. Consider relocating the visitor parking further away from Building 6; o The applicant has met this requirement. Consider a different gable treatment
for buildings 5, 7, and 12; o The applicant has met this requirement. d) Environmental Implications: The Environmental Section has reviewed the environmental consultant reports, conceptual
stormwater/rainwater management plan, geotechnical reports, arborist report and proposals for habitat compensation and mitigation. The geotechnical consultants are to coordinate their
recommendations with the environmental professionals, civil engineer and arborist to ensure consistency in the environmental objectives is achieved. Restoration measures with a cost
estimate and security deposit are required, with the standard five year maintenance period.
-7 -e) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has identified that all the services required in support of this development do not yet exist
on the site. It will therefore be necessary for the owner to enter into a Rezoning Servicing Agreement and post securities to do the work identified in that agreement. Comments provided
by the Engineering Department include: Road widening of 236 Street to a Collector road standard, and the installation of curb, gutter and separated sidewalk; A review and upgrade
of the existing storm sewer system; A Development Variance Permit is required to retain the existing aboveground utility company plant across the site frontage on 236 Street; A
charge will apply for works on 236 Street, under the Pavement Restoration Fees Bylaw, for pavement cuts required for servicing upgrades. Building Department: The site grading review
from the Building Department has identified that the geotechnical issues identified early in the process have been addressed. Due to extenuating circumstances that exist on the site
around topography, slope stability and erosion, the Building Department will allow a limited volume of stormwater to be pumped from the buildings at the west end of the site up to 236
Street. A restrictive covenant will be required to maintain minimum topsoil depths and plantings, bioswales and other requirements for vegetative cover around the emergency over-flow
of the stormwater pump. The strata will be required to maintain these stormwater management features. The Building Department will allow the pumping of sanitary sewer, but only from
basement fixtures, as required. A Development Variance Permit may be required for over-height retaining walls Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department
has identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be additional
trees and the final servicing design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase
their budget requirements. Fire Department: The Fire Department has identified that all on-site carriageways must be a minimum of 6 metres in width and posted with ‘fire lane – no parking
– tow away zone’ signage. Requirements for fire hydrant locations and unit addressing was provided to the developer.
-8 -f) Intergovernmental Issues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related
bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, Conservation boundary adjustment, is considered to be minor
in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an
adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan
and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that First and Second Reading be given to Maple
Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6832-2011, that Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6833-2011, and that application 2011-055-RZ be forwarded
to Public Hearing. "Original signed by Ann Edwards" _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Ann Edwards, CPT Senior Planning Technician "Original signed by Christine
Carter" _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" ______________________________________________
_ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" _______________________________________________ Concurrence: J. L.
(Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AE/The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – OCP Amending Bylaw No. 6832-2011 Appendix C – Zone Amending
Bylaw No. 6833-2011 Appendix D – Site Plan
-9 -Appendix E – Building Elevation Plans Appendix F – Landscape Plans
City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley District of Mission FRASER R. ^ DATE: Jun 15, 2012 FILE: 2011-055-RZ BY: PC 11461/75 236 STREET CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT 11461 11470 11536 23602 11347 11332 11342 11442 11506 23658 23408 11497 11523 11336 23608 11502 23648 23641 11513 23661 23403 23407 11355 11420 23611 11375 11421 23606 23610
11356 23651 11450 23419 23411 23436 11475 11374 11410 11440 11365 11397 11411 23631 11412 11510 11440 23418 11460 11385 11501 11386 23614 11525 23415 23422 11405 11346 11364 11494 11337
11431 11441 11509 11366 11422 11517 11521 23412 23416 11535 11575 11354 11384 11398 11430 11496 11498 23628 23621 11505 23638 11376 11396 23612 11514 11360 11316 23604 11355 11432 236
ST. 236 A ST. 116 AVE. 113 A AVE. 114 A AVE. 236 ST. 113 A AVE. 114 AVE. PARK EP 167226 SL7 Pcl. 'A' SL1 15 2 12 13 26 25 20 LMP 500 83 31 30 29 824 31 32 37 28 PARK A107 SL3 SL2 24
5 6 37 36 8 BCP27984 LMP 34938 LMP 34938 SL14 SL9 119 2 28 LMS 1325 33 29 BCP 9604 LMP 35464 3 SL16 SL8 5 P 21065 SL18 SL21 SL4 13 11 2 3 27 321 4 PARK 34 7 41 30 35 BCS 814 SL19 SL20
CPP 21065 SL22 SL26 18 15 1BCP27984 LMP 50083 23 21 38 7 23 17 9 15 38 40 34 P 7289 SL12 SL15BCS 814 P 21065 LMS 3308 SL5 174 22 LMP 11242 5 5 3516 LMP 50083 LMP 34938 39 36 SL11 SL10
SL6 SL24 16 14 4 20 18 LMP 11242 33 32 6 10 11 PARK SL13 SL17 BCS 814 SL23 SL25 19 22 6 \\ SUBJECT PROPERTIES SCALE 1:2,500 APPENDIX A ´
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6832-2011 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan _______________________________________ WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government
Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "B" & "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE,
the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6832-2011 2. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Parcel “A” (Explanatory Plan 16722)
Lot 4 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 7289; Lot 10 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 21065; and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 810,
a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation and area shown hatched is hereby amended by adding Urban Residential. 3. Schedule
“C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Parcel “A” (Explanatory Plan 16722) Lot 4 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District
Plan 7289 Lot 10 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 21065 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 836, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this
Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation and area shown hatched is hereby amended by removing from Conservation. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is
hereby amended accordingly. APPENDIX B
2 READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 200 . PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 200 . READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 200 . READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 200 . RECONSIDERED
AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . ___________________________________ _____________________________ MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
11497 11374 11420 11347 11342 23661 11433 11525 11530 11575 11494 11375 11502 23610 11332 11357 11399 11550 11405 11461 11460 11365 11505 11509 23608 11366 11396 11422 1152 1 11367 11529
11533 11537 115 26 11560 11534 11535 11384 11496 11397 11431 23621 11501 23631 11356 11376 11432 23641 11517 236 12 11413 11424 11546 11475 11440 1149 8 11536 11337 11411 11441 11510
23614 11387 11423 23671 11518 11451 11542 11523 2360 4 11355 11385 23606 11513 11457 11346 11354 11364 11398 23602 23611 11386 11412 11442 11506 11355 11336 11410 11430 11470 11421
23651 11345 11335 11377 11443 11514 11541 23681 11522 11414 11538 114 A AVE. 116 AVE. CREEKSIDE ST. 236 ST. 236 A ST. 236 B ST. BCP 9604 SL10 10 SL19 CP P 21065 SL4 SL3 19 15 2 LMP
50083 LMS 1325 LMP 11242 18 5 33 7 24 PARK EP 16722 SL11 7 SL5 1 20 5 LMP 11242 25 15 14 1 LMP 11242 35 36 PARK P 7289 BCS 814SL9 SL8 SL18 SL24 SL26 SL1 1 12 3 28 25 5 37 34 46 LMP
50083 SL16 P 21065 SL7 LMS 3308 SL23 SL21 18 13 144 22 22 35 3216 8 LMP 35464 3 SL17 SL15 SL20 16BCP27984 4 7 30 10 PARK SL13 6 P 21065 BCS 814 2 21 4 36 31 17 8 42 43 39 38 9 28 A
SL12 BCS 814 Pcl. 'A' SL22 SL2 17 2719 29 6 23 BCP27984 45 40 10 11 2627 2 29 LMP 14872 A SL14 SL6 SL25 11 1 26 24 23 321 20 38 LMP 50083 6 8 9 44 4113 12 BCP 3687 236 ST. ´ SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: 6832-2011 810 Conservation and Urban Residential Urban Residential Conservation
11497 11374 11420 11347 11342 23661 11433 11525 11530 11575 11494 11375 11502 23610 11332 11357 11399 11550 11405 11461 11460 11365 11505 11509 23608 11366 11396 11422 1152 1 11367 11529
11533 11537 115 26 11560 11534 11535 11384 11496 11397 11431 23621 11501 23631 11356 11376 11432 23641 11517 236 12 11413 11424 11546 11475 11440 1149 8 11536 11337 11411 11441 11510
23614 11387 11423 23671 11518 11451 11542 11523 2360 4 11355 11385 23606 11513 11457 11346 11354 11364 11398 23602 23611 11386 11412 11442 11506 11355 11336 11410 11430 11470 11421
23651 11345 11335 11377 11443 11514 11541 23681 11522 11414 11538 114 A AVE. 116 AVE. CREEKSIDE ST. 236 ST. 236 A ST. 236 B ST. BCP 9604 SL10 10 SL19 CP P 21065 SL4 SL3 19 15 2 LMP
50083 LMS 1325 LMP 11242 18 5 33 7 24 PARK EP 16722 SL11 7 SL5 1 20 5 LMP 11242 25 15 14 1 LMP 11242 35 36 PARK P 7289 BCS 814SL9 SL8 SL18 SL24 SL26 SL1 1 12 3 28 25 5 37 34 46 LMP
50083 SL16 P 21065 SL7 LMS 3308 SL23 SL21 18 13 144 22 22 35 3216 8 LMP 35464 3 SL17 SL15 SL20 16BCP27984 4 7 30 10 PARK SL13 6 P 21065 BCS 814 2 21 4 36 31 17 8 42 43 39 38 9 28 A
SL12 BCS 814 Pcl. 'A' SL22 SL2 17 2719 29 6 23 BCP27984 45 40 10 11 2627 2 29 LMP 14872 A SL14 SL6 SL25 11 1 26 24 23 321 20 38 LMP 50083 6 8 9 44 4113 12 BCP 3687 236 ST. ´ SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. Purpose: 6832-2011 836 To Remove From Conservation To Add To Conservation
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6833 – 2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. _____________________________________________________
______ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge,
in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6833-2011." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and
described as: Parcel “A” (Explanatory Plan 16722) Lot 4 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 7289 Lot 10 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 21065 and
outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1524 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning
Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 28th day of June, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the day of , A.D.
20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . _____________________________ ______________________
______ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX C
11497 11374 11420 11347 11342 23661 11433 11525 11530 11575 11494 11375 11502 23610 11332 11357 11399 11550 11405 11461 11460 11365 11505 11509 23608 11366 11396 11422 1152 1 11367 11529
11533 11537 115 26 11560 11534 11535 11384 11496 11397 11431 23621 11501 23631 11356 11376 11432 23641 11517 236 12 11413 11424 11546 11475 11440 1149 8 11536 11337 11411 11441 11510
23614 11387 11423 23671 11518 11451 11542 11523 2360 4 11355 11385 23606 11513 11457 11346 11354 11364 11398 23602 23611 11386 11412 11442 11506 11355 11336 11410 11430 11470 11421
23651 11345 11335 11377 11443 11514 11541 23681 11522 11414 11538 114 A AVE. 116 AVE. CREEKSIDE ST. 236 ST. 236 A ST. 236 B ST. BCP 9604 SL10 10 SL19 CP P 21065 SL4 SL3 19 15 2 LMP
50083 LMS 1325 LMP 11242 18 5 33 7 24 PARK EP 16722 SL11 7 SL5 1 20 5 LMP 11242 25 15 14 1 LMP 11242 35 36 PARK P 7289 BCS 814SL9 SL8 SL18 SL24 SL26 SL1 1 12 3 28 25 5 37 34 46 LMP
50083 SL16 P 21065 SL7 LMS 3308 SL23 SL21 18 13 144 22 22 35 3216 8 LMP 35464 3 SL17 SL15 SL20 16BCP27984 4 7 30 10 PARK SL13 6 P 21065 BCS 814 2 21 4 36 31 17 8 42 43 39 38 9 28 A
SL12 BCS 814 Pcl. 'A' SL22 SL2 17 2719 29 6 23 BCP27984 45 40 10 11 2627 2 29 LMP 14872 A SL14 SL6 SL25 11 1 26 24 23 321 20 38 LMP 50083 6 8 9 44 4113 12 BCP 3687 236 ST. ´ SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: 6833-2011 1524 RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RM-1 (Townhouse Residentiall)
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-066-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6934-2012 and Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6841-2011 26777 Dewdney Trunk
Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), to permit
the subdivision of the property into two lots. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan; however, an amendment for conservation designation is required. RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and ongoing consultation has been provided by way of posting Of ficial Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 6934-2012 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a public hearing on the
bylaw; 2. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6934-2012 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 3. That it
be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6934-2012 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6934-2012 be given First Reading and Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6841-2011 be given Second Reading
and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading: i. Amendment to Schedules “B” and “C” of the Official Community Plan;
ii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; 1103
-2 -iii. Road dedication as required; iv. Park dedication as required; v. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of
underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations. DISCUSSION: a) Background
Context: Applicant: Joel Lycan Owner: Little Bear Development Ltd Legal Description: Lot 11, Block 1, Section 19, Township 15, Plan 22220 OCP: Existing: Suburban Residential Proposed:
Suburban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Vacant Zone: RS-3 (One Family
Rural Residential) -Proposed rezoning to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) under application RZ/079/10 Designation: Suburban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential
West: Use: Vacant Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family
Residential Site Area: 1.699 ha, (4.198 acres) Access: Dewdney Trunk Road and 122 Avenue Servicing: Rural Standard Companion Applications: 2011-066-SD, 2011-066-DP
-3 -b) Project Description: The applicant proposes to rezone the subject site to allow for future subdivision into two lots. One lot would be accessed from the existing panhandle on
Dewdney Trunk Road, while the second lot would be accessed from 122 Avenue. The middle portion of the subject site containing McFadden Creek is proposed to be dedicated as park, which
requires an OCP amendment to designate the land as Conservation. This zone is in compliance with this designation, and requires municipal water and sewage disposal provided by a private
system. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The proposed rezoning to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) is in accordance with the subject properties designation as “Suburban
Residential” in the Official Community Plan. The OCP designates the site 100% Suburban Residential; however, the proposed residential development is within 50m of the top of bank of
McFadden Creek and is, therefore, subject to a Watercourse Protection Development Permit. A portion of the site will be dedicated as Park, and this dedication will trigger an Official
Community Plan amendment to Schedules “B” and “C”. The subject site is located on the Whonnock Aquifer and subject to the following OCP policy: Policy 5-37 Maple Ridge will require
an evaluation of groundwater flows, conducted by a qualified environmental professional, for new development that is adjacent to areas reliant on well water. Development proposals that
cannot ensure adequate groundwater flows, sufficient water quality or mitigate potential impacts to existing and surrounding well water systems will not be supported. A Groundwater
Impact Assessment Report conducted by a qualified environmental professional has been prepared for the proposed development. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone
the property located at 26777 Dewdney Trunk Road from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit future subdivision into two single family
lots. The proposed lots meet the minimum dimension requirements and no variances are required. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse
Protection Development Permit application is required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Pursuant to Section 8.10
of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity for; All lands with an average natural slope
of greater than 15 percent;
-4 -to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering
Department has reviewed the proposed development and has determined that road dedication is required along Dewdney Trunk Road in support of the rezoning application. As there are no
off-site works for this rezoning application, no rezoning servicing agreement will be required. The proposed development will be serviced by municipal water and sewage disposal provided
by a private system. Additional comments from the Engineering Department will be addressed at the Subdivision stage. Building Department: The Building Department has reviewed the proposed
development and has determined that a geotechnical report needs to be registered on title indicating that a geotechnical stability line (GSL) is required to protect slope stability.
e) Environmental Implications: This development application is subject to a Watercourse Protection Development Permit and a Natural Features Development Permit. The applicant has completed
an environmental assessment, arborist report, and groundwater impact assessment report to review site conditions. The certified arborist report characterized the proposed Lot 1 as mid
to late seral second growth forest, and contains western redcedar, coastal western hemlock and big leaf maple tree species. The property contained within proposed Lot 2 has been altered
by logging and land clearing. Vegetation consists of grasses, Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor), and sapling red alder (Alnus rubra). There are small groupings of mature coniferous
trees located on the margins of the property. The Groundwater Impact Assessment report identifies the Whonnock Aquifer as a highly confined aquifer, with low surface contamination.
The nature and intensity of development does not markedly increase the risk of contamination. The applicant has proposed to use a combination of habitat protection covenant and park
dedication to ensure environmentally sensitive lands are not developed. Furthermore, the geotechnical stability line has been determined to identify lands to be developed. f) Intergovernmental
Issues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance
with the procedures outlined in Section
-5 -882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, addition of conservation-designated land, is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional
consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District
or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional
District and determined to have no impact. CONCLUSION: Based on the review of supporting information regarding the proposed rezoning and subdivision applications, it is recommended
that First and Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6934-2012 and forwarded to Public Hearing; and further that Second Reading be granted
to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6841-2011 and forwarded to Public Hearing. “Original signed by Siobhan Murphy” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Siobhan
Murphy, MA, MCIP Planning Technician "Original signed by Christine Carter" _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning
"Original signed by Frank Quinn" _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L.
(Jim) Rule" _______________________________________________ Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject
Map Appendix B – Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6934-2012 Appendix C – Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6841-2011 Appendix D – Subdivision Plan
City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley District of Mission FRASER R. ^ DATE: Jun 14, 2012 FILE: 2011-066-RZ BY: PC 26777 DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 26683 26712 26814 26721 26755 26777 26766 12053 12176 12194 26860 12238 26783 26851 12042 26955 26780 12075 12206 26733 26830 12160 26960 12097 12149 12150 26743
12090 26657 26788 12130 269 ST. 269 ST. 122 AVE. Rem 3 2 EP 16704 2P 65913 P 8097 RP 12274 BCP 17138 1 9 RP 12275 Pcl A 32 LMP 22716 A BCP 4477 A P 8097 11 LMP 14104 BCP 50219 A EP
13769 10 P 22220 33 BCP 5641 12 P 22220 3 Rem 40 A B Rem 2 P 659131 LMP 22716 1 1 \\ \\ !( !( SUBJECT PROPERTY SCALE 1:2,500 APPENDIX A ´
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6934-2012 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan _______________________________________ WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government
Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "B" & "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE,
the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6934-2012 2. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 11 Section 19 Township 15 New
Westminster District Plan 22220, and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 835, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by changing from
Suburban Residential to Conservation 3. Schedule “C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 11 Section 19 Township 15 New Westminster
District Plan 22220 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 837, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation. 4. Maple
Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 20 . READ A SECOND TIME
the day of , A.D. 20 . READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20. APPENDIX B
___________________________________ _____________________________ MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
26683 26712 26814 26721 26755 26777 26766 12053 12176 12194 26860 12238 2662 0 26783 26851 12042 26914 26955 26780 12075 12206 26635 26733 26830 12160 26960 12097 12149 12150 26743 12090
26657 26788 12130 A Rem 3 EP 11548 2 LMP 23992 EP 16704 P 7439 2P 65913 P 8097 RP 12274 BCP 17138 1 9 P 21387 RP 12275 Pcl A LMP 22716 A BCP 4477 A RP 14097 P 8097 11 LMP 14104 BCP
50219 Rem Pcl. 2 A EP 13769 10 P 22220 33 BCP 5641 12 P 22220 3 Rem 40 A B Rem 2 P 8171 P 659131 LMP 22716 1 1 RP 12275 RW 24747 LMP 14105 LMP 22718 BCP 17140 P 57024 LMP 22717 LMP
26276 BCP 50222 LMP 14105 RW 72130 EP 76416 RP 65914 RP 65914 BCP 11415 EP 65916 P 57024 RW 24748 BCP 17139 LMP 40545 BCP 5642 BCP 4478 LMP 23993 EP 65916 EP 65915 LMP 22717 EP 65916
LMP 18037 RP 65914 LMP 22718 BCP 50221 BCP 50220 BCP 11416 BCP 4479 BCP 50225 269 ST. 122 AVE. DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD SCALE 1:3,000 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No.
Map No. From: To: 6934-2012 835 Suburban Residential Conservation ´
26683 26712 26814 26721 26755 26777 26766 12053 12176 12194 26860 12238 2662 0 26783 26851 12042 26914 26955 26780 12075 12206 26635 26733 26830 12160 26960 12097 12149 12150 26743 12090
26657 26788 12130 A Rem 3 EP 11548 2 LMP 23992 EP 16704 P 7439 2P 65913 P 8097 RP 12274 BCP 17138 1 9 P 21387 RP 12275 Pcl A LMP 22716 A BCP 4477 A RP 14097 P 8097 11 LMP 14104 BCP
50219 Rem Pcl. 2 A EP 13769 10 P 22220 33 BCP 5641 12 P 22220 3 Rem 40 A B Rem 2 P 8171 P 659131 LMP 22716 1 1 RP 12275 RW 24747 LMP 14105 LMP 22718 BCP 17140 P 57024 LMP 22717 LMP
26276 BCP 50222 LMP 14105 RW 72130 EP 76416 RP 65914 RP 65914 BCP 11415 EP 65916 P 57024 RW 24748 BCP 17139 LMP 40545 BCP 5642 BCP 4478 LMP 23993 EP 65916 EP 65915 LMP 22717 EP 65916
LMP 18037 RP 65914 LMP 22718 BCP 50221 BCP 50220 BCP 11416 BCP 4479 BCP 50225 269 ST. 122 AVE. DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD SCALE 1:3,000 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No.
Map No. Purpose: 6934-2012 837 To Add To Conservation ´
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6841-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. _______________________________________________________
____ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge,
in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6841-2011 ." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as: Lot 11 Section 19 Township 15 New Westminster District Plan 22220 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1529 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of
this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 26th day of July, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED
AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX C
26683 26712 26814 26721 26755 26777 26766 12053 12176 12194 26860 12238 2662 0 26783 26851 12042 26914 26955 26780 12075 12206 26635 26733 26830 12160 26960 12097 12149 12150 26743 12090
26657 26788 12130 A Rem 3 EP 11548 2 LMP 23992 EP 16704 P 7439 2P 65913 P 8097 RP 12274 BCP 17138 1 9 P 21387 RP 12275 Pcl A LMP 22716 A BCP 4477 A RP 14097 P 8097 11 LMP 14104 BCP
50219 Rem Pcl. 2 A EP 13769 10 P 22220 33 BCP 5641 12 P 22220 3 Rem 40 A B Rem 2 P 8171 P 659131 LMP 22716 1 1 RP 12275 RW 24747 LMP 14105 LMP 22718 BCP 17140 P 57024 LMP 22717 LMP
26276 BCP 50222 LMP 14105 RW 72130 EP 76416 RP 65914 RP 65914 BCP 11415 EP 65916 P 57024 RW 24748 BCP 17139 LMP 40545 BCP 5642 BCP 4478 LMP 23993 EP 65916 EP 65915 LMP 22717 EP 65916
LMP 18037 RP 65914 LMP 22718 BCP 50221 BCP 50220 BCP 11416 BCP 4479 BCP 50225 269 ST. 122 AVE. DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD SCALE 1:3,000 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To:
6841-2011 1529 RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) ´
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-050-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6846-2011 21165 River Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On August 30, 2011, Council gave First Reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending
Bylaw 6846-2011. This application is to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit a subdivision
into about 7 lots. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6846-2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded
to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following term(s) and condition(s) be met prior to final reading. i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; ii. Registration of a geotechnical
report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iii. Removal of the existing building/s and structure/s; iv. Approval from
the appropriate authorities and removal of the in-ground swimming pool; v. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence
of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations. 1104
-2 -DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Citiwest Consulting Ltd. Owner: Robert W Jones and Gordon J Kehler Legal Description: Lot 3 Except: Part Subdivided by Plan LMP434;
District Lot 249 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 75991 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Proposed: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed:
RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation Urban Residential
South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family
Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: 0.457 HA. Access: River Road and River Wynd Servicing requirement: Urban Standard Companion Applications:
2011-050-SD b) Project Description: The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
to permit subdivision into approximately seven lots.
-3 -c) Planning Analysis: The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit
subdivision into approximately seven lots, ranging in size from 560 to 777 square metres. Most of the property is located within 300 metres of the crest (top of bank) of the Fraser
River Escarpment area. Therefore, this site is subject to Council Policies 6.23 and 6.24 respecting the control of surficial and groundwater discharge. The applicant will be required
through the rezoning servicing agreement to connect and direct storm and rain water into the District’s stormwater sewer system in accordance with these policies. The lot currently
has an existing dwelling and out building (a former dwelling), a detached garage, and a swimming pool. Each of these, together with their foundations and all components of the in-ground
pool, will need to be removed. The majority of trees on the site are proposed to be removed in accordance with the recommendations of the arborist. As part of the subdivision application,
coordination will be required between the geotechnical consultant and the arborist to take this into consideration preserving as many healthy trees as possible. Official Community Plan:
The Official Community Plan designates the property Urban Residential, and is subject to the major corridor infill policies of the OCP. These policies require that development be compatible
with the surrounding neighbourhood, with particular attention to setbacks and lot configuration with the existing pattern of development in the area. The proposed rezoning to RS-1b
(One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) is in conformance with the Urban Residential designation and infill policies. Zoning Bylaw: The application proposes to rezone the property
located at 21165 River Road from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit subdivision into approximately 7 lots. Although
none are being currently contemplated, any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Information Meeting:
A development information meeting was not required because the proposal complies with the OCP and has a development potential of fewer than 25 lots.
-4 -d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The current application must comply with the following Council Policies: i. 6.24 Subdivision of, or building on, land within
300 metres of the crest of the Fraser River Escarpment; and ii. 6.23 Control of surficial and groundwater discharge in the area bounded by 207 Street, 124 Avenue, 224 Street and the
crest of the Fraser River Escarpment. The subdivision application is between 100 and 300m of the Escarpment Crest. Under the above policies, prior to the subdivision approval, the applicant
will be required to provide a written report, signed and sealed by a qualified geotechnical engineer. The proposed development will be required to extend the existing storm sewer and
confirm the system capacity. This report has been submitted and will be finalized to be acceptable to the District prior to final reading. Road widening is not being required. However,
at the time of subdivision, a development variance permit will be required to allow the current road right-of-way for River Road and River Wynd to be kept. Parks & Leisure Services
Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of
this project it is estimated that there will be an additional 7 trees which is based on one tree per lot; final subdivision design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks &
Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $175.00. Fire Department: The existing buildings are to be
secured from unauthorized entry. Removal of any oil tanks on the site requires a permit from the Fire Department. e) Intergovernmental Issues: Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure
The property is within the referral area for review by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. The usual referral and request for bylaw approval has been made by the District.
-5 -CONCLUSION: As the proposed development is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, it is recommended that Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6846-2011
and be forwarded to Public Hearing. "Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski" ____________________________________________ Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, MCAHP Planning Technician
"Original signed by Christine Carter" _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn"
_______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" ____________________________________
__________ Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer /The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B –Zone Amending Bylaw 6846-2011
Appendix C – Site Plan
City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley District of Mission FRASER R. ^ DATE: Jun 15, 2012 FILE: 2011-050-RZ BY: PC 21165 RIVER ROAD CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT 21060 21067 21078 21100 21110 21108 21107 21111 11661 11481 11610 11618 11629 11619 11608 11642 11512 11468 11601 11617 11484 1151011632 21068 21074 21083 21095 21102 21101
21106 21097 21108 11491 11527 11660 1158021138 11654 11495 21202 1155011628 11640 11672 21067 21088 21087 21092 21103 11617 21109 11677 11522 21144 21165 11515 21158 11480 11591 21211
11606 11501 11530 11566 21070 11690 21102 21106 11508 11666 11659 11487 11609 11501 11596 21180 21199 1152811618 11527 11551 11563 11502 1158711601 11615 11657 11685 21093 21099 21105
11605 11609 116 53 21116 11608 11518 21137 11672 11616 11532 11633 11641 11645 11651 1149611624 21059 11593 21073 11628 21077 21098 21104 21131 11624 21119 11484 11494 11639 11525 21169
21190 11584 11515 11520 11542 11556 11671 21073 21092 21082 11618 21090 21105 21108 21107 21111 11567 11649 11559 11662 1149011502 11522 11585 11661 1154611594 11537 11559 11633 11610
21102 21082 21112 11606 11584 11628 11625 FRASERVIEW ST. 211 ST. RIVER WYND 212 ST. 116 AVE. BERRY AVE. 212 ST. RIVER ROAD FRASERVIEW ST. RIVER WYNDWOOD ST. EDGEDALE AVE. 160163 165
166 P 43564 EP 17246 346 P 40804 64 P 40804 P 21754 P 40804 42 319 P 9773 Rem 7 35527 7 P 42541 P 43564 58 192325 34 204 P 43564 P 21754 P 46549 12 11 1 107 P 43584 P 14425 2 211 912
Rem L 2384 3 133 2 197 141 193 194326129 P 43564 203 P 45596 40 Rem Pcl A 62 65 66 70 13 P 85133 P 82848 103 162 164 57 1 478 221 130 P 27978REM. Rem 3 P 40734 63 6 LMS 1692 106 A 105
2 1 2 P 57878 135 176 56 178 P 42541 P 42541 132 P 43564 140 324 206 202 2 1 110 109 108 P 28078 10 Rem B 3 P 44948 1 LMP 16445 11 C P 42541 170 P 43564 P 44555 199 479P 46549 B 223
222 LMP 12576 224 200 323 A *PP057 73 41 RP8369 P 21754 68 12 13 1 P 14493 P 19121 10 Rem 381 82 P 11238 159 P 42541 13455P 33537 189P 61772 131 LMP 3838 191 P 44587 3735 2 201 P 46549
72 71 7 8 43 69 P 40734 42 A 5 P 14493 127 210 2 89 18 P 2497353 P 30633 1 54 P 41783161 196 169 188 195 P 41783220 P 44587 190 198 36 P 27978 1 205 322 P 75991 LMP 434 P 75991 6 67
P 73040 P 41753 128 BCP 16066 10 BP 40734 11 104 RP 30767C P 58286 P 10206 *PP169 SUBJECT PROPERTY SCALE 1:2,000 APPENDIX A ´
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6846-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. _______________________________________________________
____ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge,
in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6846-2011." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described
as: Lot 3 Except: Part Subdivided by Plan LMP434; District Lot 249 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 75991 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1533 a copy of which is attached
hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 30th day of August, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ
a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . _____________________________
____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX B
21057 21060 21067 21078 21100 21110 21108 21107 21111 11661 11481 11610 11618 11629 11619 11608 11642 11512 11468 11601 11617 11484 1151011632 11601 11498 21051 21068 21074 21083 21095
21102 21101 21106 21097 21108 11491 11527 11660 1158021138 11654 11495 21202 1155011628 11640 11672 21067 21088 21087 21092 21103 11617 21109 11677 11522 21144 21165 11515 21158 11480
21186 11591 21211 11606 11501 21232 11530 11566 21260 11640 21058 21070 11690 21102 21106 11508 11666 11659 11487 11609 11501 11596 21180 21199 1152811618 11527 11551 11563 11502 21254
21040 1158711601 11615 11657 11685 21093 21099 21105 11605 11609 11653 21116 11608 11518 21137 11672 11466 11616 21176 11532 11633 11641 11645 11651 1149611624 21222 21258 21270 11583
21059 11593 21073 11628 21077 21098 21104 21131 11624 21119 11484 11494 21112 11639 11525 21169 21190 11584 11515 11520 11542 11556 11666 11671 21073 21092 21082 11618 21090 21105 21108
21107 21111 11567 11649 11559 11662 1149011502 11522 11585 11661 1154611594 11537 11559 21256 11657 11543 11633 11610 21102 21082 21112 11606 11584 11628 11625 11641 21299 11604 11616
11626 FRASERVIEW ST. LAIT Y ST. 211 ST. RIVER WYND 212 ST. 116 AVE. BERRY AVE. 212 ST. RIVER ROAD FRASERVIEW ST. RIVER WYNDWOOD ST. EDGEDALE AVE. 377 79 81 136 151 150 160163 165 166
P 43564 EP 17246 38 321 39 346 P 40804 64 P 40804 P 21754 P 40804 42 319 P 9773 Rem 7 P 14425 P 58126 80 P 35527 7 157 P 42541 P 43564 58 192325 34 204 P 43564 P 21754 P 46549 P 28078
12 11 1 107 P 43584 P 14425 2 211 912 Rem L 2384 3 4 P 39498 25P 42541 138 133 2 197 142 141 193 194326129 P 43564 203 P 45596 40 Rem Pcl A 62 65 66 70 13 P 85133 P 82848 103 75385
E 177 26 162 164 13957 1 478 221 130 P 27978REM. Rem 3 P 40734 63 6 LMS 1692 106 A 105 2 1 2 P 57878 P 34338 378 135 158 176 56 178 P 42541 P 42541 132 P 43564 140 324206 202 2 1 110
109 108 P 28078 10 Rem B 3 P 44948 1 LMP 16445 11 C 6 269 P 692 P 42541 170 P 43564 P 44555 199 479P 46549 B 223 222 LMP 1257 6 224 200 323 A *PP057 73 41 RP8369 P 21754 68 12 1413
1 P 14493 P 19121 10 Rem 381 275 274 82 P 11238 159 P 42541 156 152 137 13455P 33537 189P 61772 131 LMP 3838 191327 P 44587 3735 2 201 P 46549 72 71 7 8 45 43 69 P 40734 42 A 5 P 14493
127 210 2 89 18 P 2497353 P 30633 1 8 270 P 28112 456 155 154 153 54175 P 41783161 196 169 188 195 P 41783220 P 44587 190 198 36 P 27978 1 205 322 P 75991 LMP 434 P 75991 6 67 P 7 3040
P 41753 128 BCP 16066 10 BP 40734 11 104 RP 30767C P 58286 P 10206 *PP169 P 58126LMP 29183 RW 58127 EP 23001 RW 42542 EP 61773 BCP 16067 LMP 24899 EP 46866 LMP 21878 LMP 29101 RW 58128
EP 54519 RW 56468 LMP 32118 RW 425 42 RW 42542 EP 54519 EP 27702 LMP 28484 EP 28014 BCP 21377 SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: 6846-2011 1533 RS-1
(One Family Urban Residential) RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) ´
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-054-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6827 -2011 22327 River Road and Roll #31399-0000-4 (no civic address) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On June 14, 2011, Council gave First
Reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6827–2011. This application is to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential zone) to CRM (Commercial/Residential
zone) to allow future construction of a four-storey apartment building with 43 units. This project meets the requirements for inclusion in the Town Centre Incentives (TCI) Program as
it is new residential construction within Sub Area 1 that is 4 storeys and higher and is subject to compliance with the Town Centre Development Permit Guidelines and Policies. RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6827 -2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading.
i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; ii. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the
Agreement; iii. Amendment to Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan; iv. Registration of a Geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the
site for the proposed development; v. Road dedication as required; vi. Consolidation of the development site; 1105
-2 -vii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile
pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations. viii. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking. DISCUSSION: a)
Background Context: Applicant: Fred Formosa of Falcon Homes Ltd. Owner: Falcon Homes Ltd. Legal Description: Lot: A, D.L.: 398, Block: 1, Plan: 155; PID: 011-537-604 Lot: 6, D.L.: 398,
Block: 1, Plan: 155; PID: 011-537-060 OCP: Existing: Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial and Mixed-Use Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential zone) Proposed: CRM (Commercial/Residentia
l zone) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Multi Family Residential and lane Zone: CRM (Commercial/Residential zone) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential zone) Designation: Port Haney Multi-Family,
Commercial and Mixed-Use South: Use: Single Family Residential, Industrial and River Road Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential zone), RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential zone) and
M-2 (General Industrial zone Designation: Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial and Mixed-Use East: Use: Heritage Commercial, Commercial and Industrial Zone: H-1 (Heritage Commercial
zone); C-4 (Neighbourhood Pub zone) and M-2 (General Industrial zone) Designation: Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial and Mixed-Use West: Use: Single Family Residential and 223rd Street
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential zone) Designation: Low-rise Apartment
-3 -Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: Multi-Family Residential (apartments) Site Area: 1622.99 m2 Access: River Road and the lane Servicing requirement: Full
Urban Companion Applications: 2011-054-DP and DVP b) Project Description: The subject sites (Appendix A) include two legal lots with a consolidated area of 1623 m2, north of the Fraser
River and east of 223rd Street, along the southern edge of the Town Centre Area. Currently the site is vacant, surrounded by road on three sides (i.e. a lane on the north; River Road
on the south and 223rd Street on the west). The Billy Miner Pub is located on the east. The proposal is strategically located to take advantage of the Fraser River views and opposite
the West Coast Express train station for commuters. The subject site lies within the Fraser River Escarpment area and has a significant slope down from the lane to River Road (north
to south). The proposal is to rezone the subject sites to CRM (Commercial/Residential zone) to permit a four-storey apartment building with 43 units; and underground parkade. Most of
the residential parking is proposed in the under-ground parkade, except six spaces which are proposed in the three double car garages accessible at grade from the lane on the north.
The required visitor parking stalls are proposed at grade accessible from the lane. The building will contain 43 apartments (one, two and three bedroom units) ranging in sizes from
43.66 m2 (470 ft2) to 119.8 m2 (1290 ft2), proposed on four floors with viewing patios and balconies for the units facing River Road. A ramp leading to the under-ground parkade is proposed
in the south-east corner of the site and pedestrian access to the building is through the entrance lobby facing River Road (Appendix C). A small outdoor amenity area is proposed on
the east with some planters and movable seating for the residents to use (Appendix E). c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan & Town Centre Area Plan: The Town Centre area is
divided into seven precincts and the subject sites lie along the southern edge of the Town Centre Area, within the “Port Haney and Waterfront Precinct”. This precinct is bounded by
the west boundary of the Town Centre Area Plan, 117th Avenue, 224th street (including some properties on the east side of 224th Street) and continues along the waterfront to the east
boundary of the Town Centre. Historically, Port Haney area served as the District’s commercial hub, the remnants of which are heritage buildings such as Haney House, St. Andrew’s Church
and the Billy Miner Pub (on the east of the subject sites). Today, the Port Haney & Fraser River Waterfront Area is recognized as an area in transition. Retaining the historical character
and encouraging pedestrian and multi-modal linkage to the central business district are important for this area. This precinct is within walking distance of the civic core area and
serves as a vital walkable link to key destinations including the Fraser River waterfront and the West Coast Express train station. This proposal will benefit from a future walkway
and
-4 -development along the wharf. 223rd Street would be the shortest pedestrian connection to the central business district. A separated sidewalk, boulevard, curb and gutter on 223rd
Street, to match the proposed development on the north of the lane, will further enhance the multi-modal linkages to the civic core area of the town centre. The pedestrian underpass
(tunnel) connecting to 224th Street and the civic core area is in close proximity to the subject sites. The uses permitted in the “Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial and Mixed-Use”
designation include ground-oriented development forms such as row houses, town houses, stacked townhouses, lowrise apartment, commercial or mixed-use. The proposed low-rise apartment
form on subject sites, aligns with this and aims to capitalize on important views of the Fraser River. The developer and his team are working to consistency with the policies and development
permit guidelines outlined in the Town Centre Area Plan. This will be the subject of a future Council report. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject properties
from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential zone) to CRM (Commercial/Residential zone). The proposed CRM (Commercial/Residential zone) provides for a mix of residential and commercial uses
and is specifically for lands designated Commercial/Apartment in the Port Haney area. Apartment use is a permitted principle use in this zone. The proposed apartment building complies
with the maximum height and setback requirements of the zone. This zone permits 90% lot coverage on main and first floors and a reduced maximum lot coverage of 50% above the second
floors. The applicant has proposed reduced maximum lot coverage on main and first floors and increased maximum lot coverage on third and fourth floors, to avoid a wedding cake like
form. This is considered a variance and will be the subject of a future Council report. Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: The Town Centre Parking Strategy revisited parking standards
for some uses within the Town Centre Area and includes revised parking standards for residences based on number of bedrooms for a multi-family residential use. This proposal benefits
from the reduced parking standards due to its location and because it is eligible for the Town Centre Incentive Program in Sub-Area 1. As per Section 10 of the Maple Ridge Off-Street
Parking and Loading Bylaw #4350-1990, a minimum of 0.9 spaces per unit are required for a bachelor apartment which increases by 0.1 space per additional bedroom. Based on these parking
standards, for a total of 43 units (16 one-bedroom units plus 24 two-bedroom units plus 3 three-bedroom units), this project requires 46 residential parking spaces and 5 visitor parking
spaces. Total proposed parking spaces in the under-ground parkade are 40 spaces and the remaining six spaces are provided in the three 2-car garages facing the lane (Appendix D). All
the required visitor parking stalls are proposed at grade, covered above by the first floor, facing the lane (Appendix C). The developer has opted to provide some additional tandem
parking stalls in the under-ground parkade which are anticipated to serve the same unit owners and serve as an important marketing tool for the project. The required long-term bicycle
storage lockers are proposed in the under-ground parkade and the short-term bicycle parking spaces have been proposed near the visitor parking stalls as shown on the site plan (Appendix
C).
-5 -Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.11 of the Official Community Plan the proposal is subject to the Town Centre Area Development Permit Guidelines to address the form and
character of the development. This will be the subject of a future Council report. Advisory Design Panel: The proposal was first reviewed at the February 14, 2012 Advisory Design Panel
meeting. The panel had several concerns and passed the following resolution at this meeting: The proposal be re-submitted and presented at a future Advisory Design Panel meeting with
the following concerns addressed; Submit the following: a Context Plan; Streetscape Elevations; Coloured Elevations of the building, with details of the east property line building
and parking; Consider a more cohesive design and material treatment for all the elevations of the building; Provide handicapped access to the garbage enclosure; Provide appropriate
access to the Outdoor Amenity Space; Consider a landscape buffer along River Road; Re-consider the suite/unit layout with bedroom that has no window; Provide details of the long-term
bicycle storage; Provide details of the transformer location; Coordinate the landscape and architectural drawings with the civil drawings with regard to off-site works and boulevard
location; ensure all drawings are accurate & complete. Consider Children’s Play Area within the Outdoor Amenity Space; Re-evaluate the need for enclosed balconies; Consider additional
tree planting along the lane, on both sides including reduction of parking as needed; Confirm and show that the garbage and recycling proposed, complies with the DMR Waste Management
Guidelines; Provide direct access to the Mechanical Room; Allocate extra space of Electrical Room to storage space; Specify route of the second exit on the ramp going into the
U/G parkade; Review sizes of individual storages proposed in the U/G parkade; Specify details of how the water is collected and drained, from the top deck; Adjust the roof plan
to show necessary slopes behind the towers.
-6 -After the applicant addressed the above concerns, the panel reviewed the revised proposal at the April 10, 2012 Advisory Design Panel meeting. The resolution passed at this meeting
was: The following concerns be addressed and digital versions of revised drawings and memo be submitted to Planning staff; and further that Planning staff forward this on to the Advisory
Design Panel for information; Updated landscape plans to show street trees in correct locations; Consider street front entrances where possible; Consider addition of window to
Units C, C1 and D; Provide dimensions for the smaller storage lockers; Consider providing details at the gables of the roof; Provide an updated rendering; Consider locating
the entry feature on the grid of the buildings; Provide handicapped ramp details at the front entry; Provide exterior lighting details. The revised drawings have been forwarded
to the panel for review. The architectural details will be the subject of a future Council report prior to approval of a Development Permit. Development Information Meeting: On May
31, 2012, the developer and his team of consultants hosted the “Development Information Meeting” at the Fraser Room, in the Maple Ridge Library from 6:00 to 8:30 PM. This meeting was
attended by two persons who expressed concerns such as: noise from the train, increased traffic and lack of street parking in this area. There was a positive comment about how this
proposal will bring some improvements to this area. One resident of this area who could not attend this meeting and who is not opposed to this project, conveyed concerns regarding additional
cars in an overall constrained area and lack of street parking on the Haney Bypass, noting that densifying this area is appropriate but needs careful attention to supporting infrastructure
for auto-users and pedestrians alike. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The Development Information Meeting was an opportunity for any affected parties to express any concerns and the
future Public Hearing will be another opportunity to do the same. e) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department reviewed the proposal and determined
that all the required off-site services do not exist. The deficient services which are required to be provided through a Rezoning Servicing Agreement include the following: a 2.2 metre
road dedication and upgrades such as concrete curb, gutter, sidewalk and street trees on River Road; a separated sidewalk, boulevard,
-7 -curb, gutter and street trees on 223rd Street; a reconstructed lane with street parking on the north side of the lane; new sanitary sewer connections; new storm sewer and catch basins;
under-ground wiring for utilities; new fire hydrant and service connection, etc. A servicing estimate will be prepared once the developer’s engineer submits an acceptable off-site servicing
design, which is a standard practice for all development proposals. Fire Department: The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and comments have been provided to the applicant.
The applicant has ensured that all these will be addressed through the Building Permit drawings. Building Department: The Building Department has reviewed the proposal and comments
have been provided to the applicant. The site is within the Fraser River Escarpment Area so the Geotechnical report should address this policy. A more detailed review will take place
prior to the Development Permit approval. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the Development Permit is completed
they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their
budget requirements. f) School District Comments: A referral was sent to the School District office and no comments were received. g) Intergovernmental Issues: A referral was sent to
the Ministry of Transportation and Highways, for preliminary approval, as the subject site lies within 800 metres of the Haney Bypass. On June 11, 2012, preliminary approval for the
proposed bylaw was received.
-8 -CONCLUSION: The applicant is seeking some variances that will need consideration at a future Council meeting. The development proposal promises some off-site improvements which will
benefit the over-all multi-modal connectivity for the area and fits well with Council’s vision of densification within the Town Centre Area. This proposal also qualifies for the Town
Centre Incentives Program, therefore it is recommended that Council grant Second Reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6827 – 2011 and forward it to Public Hearing. ____________________________________
___________ Prepared by: Rasika Acharya, B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED® AP, MCIP Planner _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director
of Planning _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services _______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6827 – 2011 Appendix
C – Proposed Site Plan Appendix D – Proposed Building Elevations Appendix E – Proposed Landscape Plan "Original signed by Rasika Acharya" "Original signed by Christine Carter" "Original
signed by Frank Quinn" "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley District of Mission FRASER R. ^ DATE: Jun 15, 2012 FILE: 2011-054-RZ BY: PC 22327 RIVER ROAD & ROLL #31399-0000-4 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT
OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 22269 11575 22323 22367 22375 22300 1158022327 223 79 22350 11613 11598 11650 11656 11587 11566 11630 11664 22233 22259 22302 22335 22345 11617 11657
22272 (Station) 22344 22355 11641 22268 22279 22289/91 22344 22410 22381 22362 11671 11612 116 AVE. CALLAGHAN AVE. RIVER RD. GAZETTED ROAD CALLAGHAN AVE. HANEY BYPASS A N B H BCP 10Rem
Rem9 Rem Z P 86773 1 184 P 155 415 31 129 Rem 18 A 2 P 14332 RP 6579 LMS 752P 155 P 76188 Pcl.A RP 65880 P 82887 11 P 63822 11 RP 5374 A Sk. 4878 *PP078 128 SK 125 RP 7373 A K RP 4605
1 PARK 8 RP 6192 22 RP 6755 RP 5978 B 2 T RP 52214F LMS 3297 2 2 5 3 7 P RP 2100 RP 2100 (P 155 ) 47640 P 155 P 155 L 25 M 23 2 P 164641 P 155 RP 5637 P 59018 A P 1636621 9 24 14 A
S 1/2 1 Pcl. A RP 5335 RP 4665 20 BCP 47338 A Rem. Rem EP 59768 14 Rem P 15654F E 42' of 26 131 EP 66980 12 13 SUBJECT PROPERTIES SCALE 1:2,000 APPENDIX A ´ ´
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6827 -2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. ______________________________________________________
_____ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge,
in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6827 -2011." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and
described as: Lot “A” (N23985E) Block 1 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 155 Lot 6 District Lot 398 Block 1, New Westminster District Plan 155 and outlined in
heavy black line on Map No. 1521 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to CRM (Commercial/Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No.
3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 14th day of June, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 2012. PUBLIC
HEARING held the day of , A.D. 2012. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 2012. APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the
day of , A.D. 20 . _____________________________ ____________________________ PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX B
11725 22269 11575 11654 22323 22367 22375 22181 22277 22300 1158022327 22328 22331 22379 22350 11613 22369/73 11598 11690 22177 11665/11667 22340 22337 11650 11656 11682 11595 11587
22362 22372 11566 11630 11664 11686 22233 22259 22302 22309 22335 22345 11617 11657 22488/92 2227 2 (Station) 22319 22344 22355 22351 11641 11672 22173 22268 22279 22289/91 22344 22352
22357 22410 22381 22362 11671 11683 11664 11612 116 AVE. CALLAGHAN AVE. 222 ST. RIVER RD. GAZETTED ROAD ST. ANNE AVE. HANEY BYPASS CALLAGHAN AVE. HANEY BYPASS 214 210 Park A P11527
N BC H BCP 10 Rem Rem RP 53523 9 Rem 14 Z P 86773 1 3 P 5871 184 P 155 415 31 Rem 129 11 Rem 18 ARem A 2 P 14332 P 34597 211 BCS 2550 RP 6579 LMS 752 P 155 P 76188 Pcl.A RP 65880 P
82887 Rem 11 P 63822 11 RP 5374 A Sk. 4878 T 213208 *PP078 128 SK 125 P 155 RP 7373 A10 K RP 4605 1 PARK 12 8 RP 6192 22 RP 6755 RP 5978 16 17 B 2 T RP 52214F NWS 3379 LMS 683 212 207
LMS 3297 2 2 5 3 7 P RP 2100 2 RP 2100 (P 155) 47640 P 155 P 155 L 25 M 23 2 P 164641 P 155 N 1/2 RP 5637 NWS 3383 A P 59018 A P 1636622 21 13 9 24 14 A S 1/2 A P 5871 74 P 69427 Pcl.
"1" 1 Pcl. A RP 5335 9 RP 4665 20 19 *PP076BCP 47338 A Rem. P 6689 P 87404 A LMP 1864 215 Rem EP 59768 14 Rem P 15654F E 42' of 26 131 EP 66980 12 13 LMS 2749 17 NWS 1811 P 85354 224
ST. HANEY BYPASS SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: 6827-2011 1521 RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) CRM (Commercial/Residential) ´
District Of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-005-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6926-2012 20528 Lougheed Highway EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On May 22, 2012, Council gave First Reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending
Bylaw 6926-2012. This application is to rezone the subject properties from CS-1 (Service Commercial) to C-2 (Community Commercial), to permit an existing commercial building to be expanded
and allow a broader range of commercial uses. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6926-2012 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the
following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; ii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer
advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with
the regulations; iii. Registration of a revised easement for mutual access, reconfiguration and coordination of parking and maneuvering aisles with the adjoining lot to the east (20580
Lougheed Highway). DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Shauna Steven (Spire Development Corporation) Owner: R. Tong MD Inc. 1106
-2 -Legal Description: Lot 1 Except: Part subdivided by Plan LMP20045; District Lot 222 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 72179 OCP: Existing: Commercial Zoning: Existing: CS-1 (Service
Commercial) Proposed: C-2 (Community Commercial) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Commercial Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial), & RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation Commercial
South: Use: Residential (south of abutting lane) Zone: R-1 (Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Commercial Zone: CD-1-92 (A Comprehensive Development Zone for
medically-related uses) Designation: Commercial West: Use: Commercial Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial) Designation: Commercial Existing Use of Property: Commercial Proposed Use of Property:
Commercial Site Area: 0.327 ha. (0.8 acre) Access: Lougheed Highway and lane behind Servicing: Full Urban Companion Applications: 2012-005-DP b) Project Description: The subject site
is located on the south side of Lougheed Highway, across from Triple Tree Nurseryland. The parcel is 0.327 ha. in size and has access to a lane from 118 Avenue. The applicant proposes
to convert and extend the existing commercial building. The current CS-1 zone limits the types of professional uses it permits. A drop-in medical clinic would be permitted, but not
medical specialist offices, a pharmacy and diagnostic facilities. The C-2 zone is less restrictive, allowing the medical clinic and all of the proposed uses the applicant is seeking.
The existing building is approximately 646 m2 (6,958 ft2). With the proposed addition of about 524m2 (5,640 ft2), the total floor area of the proposed building will be 1,170 m2 (12,
598 ft2).
-3 -Parking is provided in two areas. In front, there will be 39 parking spaces, two of which will be handicapped spaces. To the rear with lane access, will be 13 spaces intended to
be for staff. Access to the front parking area is by way of an existing driveway through the lands to the east (20580 Lougheed Highway) as part of a previous development application
for those lands. The access is secured by way of an existing easement, with the District as a third party on the associated restrictive covenant. Running concurrently with this application
is Development Permit application (2012-005-DP). It will govern the details of the proposed expansion, exterior renovations, parking layout, landscaping and signage. c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan: This western stretch of the Lougheed Highway was predominantly Service Commercial historically and is designated General Commercial. The adoption of the Official
Community Plan in 2006 introduced greater flexibility in the possible range of permitted commercial uses (including the C-2 Community Commercial Zone) in this designation. This change
was in order to meet consumer demand and respond to market trends. For this reason, this proposal is entirely consistent with the Official Community Plan, and complies with the policies
in section 6.3.4 General Commercial of the Official Community Plan. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject site from CS-1 (Service Commercial) to C-2 (Community
Commercial) to permit the existing 646 m2 building to be expanded by 524 m2 and have a total floor area of 1,170 m2. A preliminary review of the proposed building and associated parking
has concluded that the proposal complies with the applicable Zoning Bylaw and parking regulation. Although none are currently being contemplated, any variations from the requirements
of the proposed zone would require a development variance permit application Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.5 of the Official Community Plan, a Commercial Development Permit
application is required to address the current proposal’s compatibility with adjacent development, and to enhance the unique character of the community. Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting was held by the applicant on June 11, 2012 at the Hammond Community Centre. The number of individuals that attended was 22. Concerns raised by those
attending related to: parking and lane access, loading and access to the lane garbage enclosure,
-4 -safety and security, and landscaping and esthetics. The applicant proposes to respond to these concerns as follows: 1. Relocate the garbage enclosure to the north side of building.
Provide a small, one bin enclosure constructed of concrete block, painted to match building with perforated metal gates. Provide landscape screening. 2. All deliveries to be at north
end of building through main doors. Only small, cube van delivery vehicles are anticipated. 3. Provide a locking gate at the pedestrian corridor on the east end of building. Will be
for staff access only. 4. Discuss with city and engineering departments the installation of speed bumps, signage and mirrors in rear lane to address traffic safety concerns of residents.
5. Provide landscaping at rear of building for esthetic enhancement. As indicated above, a number of concerns were raised by the public at the DIM meeting. All appear related to: building
design; on-site parking and delivery issues. However, the most significant concern expressed is over the applicant’s plan to utilize the existing lane for staff parking. The history
of the lane and area lot patterning needs some explanation. Prior to 1980, this portion of Lougheed Highway contained a variety of odd, large sized lots extending southwards. Over time
subdivisions occurred which did not anticipate the need for lane network running parallel to Lougheed Highway. In 1994, this changed with the submission of a subdivision application
on the subject site that proposed a 7 lot subdivision. The proposal consisted of two (2) commercial lots fronting Lougheed Highway, each with an existing commercial building, and five
(5) single family residential lots fronting 118th Avenue. All but one of the single family lots had access from 118th Avenue. As part of this application the Ministry of Transportation
and Highways required a lane be built as alternative access for the two commercial lots. Given the lot pattern in the area, no further lane extensions are possible. Air photo records
from 1994 reveal the rear lane having been built but only one of the commercial lots (20580 Lougheed) had access to the lane. No residential homes were built on any of the lots in 1994.
A review of the subsequent air photo records reveal that only two of the 5 single family lots were built on by 2000. The subsequent three (3) additional lots were built on after the
year 2000. In 2006, an area resident requested the lane be closed to commercial traffic that was using it as a “rat run” from Lougheed Highway to destinations south, thereby avoiding
the light and traffic congestion at the 207th intersection. This request was reviewed and approved by the Municipal Engineer in 2006. A 2.0 metre high chain link fence was subsequently
erected among the north side of the lane. Since that time the lane has served exclusively as access to the rear yards of the six (6) adjoining residential lots fronting 118th Avenue.
Although it appears that the lane was intended to serve as an alternative access for one or both of the existing commercial parcels fronting Lougheed, it actually only served 20580
Lougheed Highway and for only a short time (1994-2006) before being closed off. There is no possibility of the lane now being extended further east or west. Over the past few years,
area residents have come to regard the lane as a residential use, going as far as planting landscaping along the northern side of
-5 -the lane along the chain link fence. They are not in favour of the lane being reopened even for limited use by medical staff as proposed by the applicant. The developer has responded
by: increasing the amount of landscaping at the rear of the building and in the staff parking area; and relocating the garbage and delivery areas from the lane. Advisory Design Panel:
The plans, design drawings and landscape plans submitted in support of the development permit application were reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel at the June 12, 2012 meeting. The
Advisory Design Panel is in support of the general concept as submitted, and made the following resolution: The application be supported and the following concerns be addressed as the
design develops and submitted to Planning staff for follow up; Consider providing more detail on the face of the fascia of the decorative roof. Provide details of signage on the
East Elevation. Provide civil drawings which explain the treatment along lane and Lougheed highway. Consider any improvements to the lane, in particular tree planting on the south
side of the lane. Consider on-site storm-infiltration into the planting in the north of the parking lot. Clarification of parking wheel stops requirements. Consider reducing patron
or visitor parking to establish a pedestrian access to the building. Consider as much of a landscape planting provision around the garbage enclosure including additional trees.
Consider the addition of planting against the south and east walls. Consider addition of lighting on the south side of the building. Clarify that there is a low evergreen hedge
on the North, East and West edges of the parking lot. Provide sufficient soil depth for trees in the parking lot. Consider a different location for the garbage enclosure (not at
the entrance of the parking lot). Consider providing a parapet screen around the roof top to screen the roof-top units. Consider providing a parking lot organization coordinated
with the neighbor next door to provide a functional solution. The revised plans, once submitted, will be brought forward with a staff report for Council to consider authorizing issuance
of the development permit. After this, the applicant may obtain the required building permits to undertake the extension and exterior renovations being proposed.
-6 -d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: Engineering Department comments related to road improvements (roll-over curbs and gutter for lane parking; sidewalk, street
trees, lighting and underground wiring along Lougheed Highway), confirming adequacy of service connections (currently in easements through the property to the east), and legal arrangements
for parking and access (the parking spaces and access is joined with the land to the east and secured by easement). The detailed Engineering Comments have been provided to applicant
to be resolved prior to Council granting Final Reading. Fire Department: The Fire Department has reviewed the application and has provided comments related to the usual practices for
fire safety. No issues were raised related to access to the site, proposed lane usage or on-site circulation. The detailed Fire Comments have been provided to applicant to be resolved
at the building permit stage. e) Intergovernmental Issues: Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure: The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure has granted preliminary approval
to this rezoning for a one year period. This is subject to an application and issuance of a commercial access permit to the applicant if the current access arrangements are to be changed.
The approval also requires a minimum setback of 4.5 meters (about 24 meters proposed) from the Lougheed Highway. The District becomes responsible for maintaining boulevard landscaping,
and sidewalks the developer is required to construct along the Lougheed Highway. Responsibility related to highway safety is under a Ministry’s maintenance contract.
-7 -CONCLUSION: This proposal involves converting and expanding an existing service commercial building into a building that will accommodate commercial community uses. A number of concerns
have been raised by area residents regarding the use of the lane. The applicant has suggested ways to mitigate potential impacts. The proposed zone to accommodate the proposed uses
would comply with the existing OCP Commercial designation. It would be in order for Council to consider granting Zone Amending Bylaw 6926-2008 Second Reading and forwarding the application
to Public Hearing. "Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski" _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, MCAHP Planning Technician "Original
signed by Christine Carter" _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" __________________________
_____________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" _______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B –Zone Amending Bylaw 6926-2008 Appendix
C – Site Plan Appendix D – Building Elevation Plans Appendix E – Landscape Plans
City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley District of Mission FRASER R. ^ DATE: May 7, 2012 FILE: 2012-005-RZ BY: PC 20528 LOUGHEED HWY CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT 20464 20475 20484 20497 20680 20448 20478 20537 20554 20459 20473 20492 20547 20630 20433 20448 20436 20468 20490 20557 20611 20675 20452 20458 20456 20461 20519 20528 20567
20580 20610 20432 20472 2049820491 20531 20556 20625 20629 20445 20525 20522 20592 20440 20483 20492 20505 20503 20577 118 AVE. 119 AVE. LOUGHEED HWY. 206 ST. WALNUT CR. 6 A 1 2NWS
3141 Rem 5 7 LMP 20045 (LEASE PLAN) P 76445 A 4 16 P 86291 4 P 80213 6 P 75414 P 25311 8031 P 77691 11 5 P 64073 17 1 2 RP 7130 1 38 9 2 RemLMP 46838 P 9801 1 LMP 25177 P 77800 P 13954Pcl.
'One' P 72179 Rem "D" 3 NWS 2745 2 10Rem C 13 141 BCP 1643 4 2 NWS 2959 LMP 1703 P 9031 12 75 Rem *LMP 36563 31 3 Rem. 1 P 78869 NWS 3136 P 87086 1 3 15P 77691 3 1 P 69662 1 LMP 20045
P 75414 2 P 10201 P 75414 SUBJECT PROPERTY ´SCALE 1:2,000 APPENDIX A
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6926-2012 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended ________________________________________________________
___ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge,
in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6926-2012." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described
as: Lot 1 Except: Part subdivided by Plan LMP20045; District Lot 222 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 72179 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1570 a copy of which is
attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to C-2 (Community Commercial). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are
hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of
, A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . _____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX B
20475 20484 20497 20680 20478 20537 20554 20459 20473 20492 20547 20630 20433 20436 20468 20490 20557 20611 20675 20452 20458 20461 20519 20528 20567 20580 20610 2049820491 20531 20625
20629 20445 20525 20522 20592 20483 20492 20505 20503 20577 118 AVE. 119 AVE. LOUGHEE D HWY. 206 ST. WALNUT CR. 6 A 1 2NWS 3141 Rem 5 7 LMP 20045 (LEASE PLAN) 4 16 P 86291 4 P 80213
6 P 75414 P 25311 803 P 77691 5 P 64073 17 1 2 1 2 RemLMP 46838 1 LMP 25177 P 77800 P 13954Pcl. 'One' P 72179 3 NWS 2745 2 Rem C 1 BCP 1643 4 2 NWS 2959 LMP 1703 P 9031 75 Rem *LMP
36563 3 3 Rem. 1 P 78869 NWS 3136 P 87086 1 3 15P 77691 3 1 P 69662 LMP 20045 P 75414 2 P 10201 P 75414 37752 (easement) RW 77801 LMP 33006 LMP 25181 RW 77448 RW 86292 LMP 25178 LMP
749 LMP 46837 LMP 20046 RW 79412 RW 77692 RW 69663 RW 75415 LMP 25179 LMP 32053 LMP 37751 (lease) RW 77692 RW 77448 BCP44492 EP 38535 EP 38535 LMP 25180 LMP 32054 0.569 LOUGHEED HWY.
118 AVE. ´ SCALE 1:2,000 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: CS-1 (Service Commercial) C-2 (Community Commercial) 6926-2012 1570
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-027-DVP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: CoW SUBJECT:
Development Variance Permit 24207 102 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Development Variance Permit has been received in support of a Subdivision application and an Intensive Residential
Development Permit application. The applicant is requesting variances to the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw and the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw. It is recommended
that 2012-027-DVP be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-027-DVP respecting property located at 24207 102 Avenue. DISCUSSION: a)
Background Context Applicant: CIPE Homes Inc. Owner: Paul Kaczan Legal Description: Lot: B, Section 3, Township 12, Plan: BCP9309 OCP : Existing: Medium Density Residential Proposed:
Medium Density Residential Zoning: Existing: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family
Residential Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Designation: Medium Density Residential South: Use: Conservation Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation:
Conservation 1107
-2 -East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Designation: Medium Density Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-3 (Special
Amenity Residential District) Designation: Medium Density Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area:
0.816 ha (2 acres) Access: from the lane off of 241A Street Servicing: Full Urban Standard Previous Applications: RZ, SD, DP & VP/062/03 and 2012-SD, DP Requested Variance: To Maple
Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 4800-1993 Schedule “B” and “C” & Section IV A 4. and To Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 – 1985 Section 601 C. E,b.ii. b) Project
Description: The subject property is located within the Albion Area Plan and is developing in accordance with the established neighbourhood and road pattern. It was part of a larger
parcel which was rezoned in 2004; at that time the north portion was subdivided into 25 lots, leaving the home site on this 0.861 ha parcel which fronts onto 102 Avenue. An application
has now been received to subdivide the remainder into 27 lots under the R-3 zone (Special Amenity Residential District), which permits lots not less than 213 m2. The subdivision will
connect 102A Avenue as well as the lane off of 102 Avenue through the site providing an improved circulation pattern for pedestrians and traffic. A temporary access to 102 Avenue will
be provided to minimize the construction impact on the adjacent neighbourhood. The variances requested are to: the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw to permit the existing
Albion Village Standard for road widths and construction standards and for the minimum lot depth on arterial roads for those lots which will front onto 102 Avenue; and the Zoning
Bylaw to allow a reduction in the side yard setback from 2 metres to 1.8 metres to allow for wider garages. The Albion Village Standards were established in 1997 in support of the first
R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Zone. The standard approved was based on a traffic assessment prepared by Trevor Ward and Associates and reviewed and supported by the Engineering
Department. This standard has been used throughout the area known as the Albion Village area. The specific variances requested from those established in the Subdivision and Development
Servicing Bylaw, are reflective of the established subdivision pattern, and are discussed in more detail below.
-3 -There are 3 variances being requested as follows: 1. Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Services Bylaw: a) Section IV General Requirements A. 4, states “No parcel abutting a
controlled access highway or municipal arterial road shall be created having a parcel depth of less than 30 metres.” Lot depth for future lots fronting onto an arterial (102 Avenue)
do not meet this minimum requirement and; b) Schedule “B”& “C” to achieve the Albion Village street standard; Schedule “B” 3., Minor Street, urban standard, minimum width 18m; Schedule
“B” 5., Lane, minimum width 7.5m; and Schedule C the construction standard. 2. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw, Section 601C, E, b,ii) states “Buildings and Structures for Accessory Residential
Use and Accessory Off-Street Parking Use shall be sited not less than 0.45 metres from an interior side lot line provided that a minimum setback of 2 metres is maintained for the other
side yard”. (see Appendix B) c) Planning Analysis of requested Variances: 1. Subdivision Servicing and Development Bylaw variances: a. Section IV A. 4 -Lot Depth on Arterial Roads:
The overall subdivision lotting pattern for the “Albion Village” has already been established through previous subdivision applications. This pattern established the lot depth fronting
102 Avenue (an arterial road), at 27.44 metres in depth. This reduction in lot depth will still provide for an 11 metre rear yard setback for the principal building leaving this area
for accessory buildings and private yard space for these lots. This variance would enable the continuation of the established lot pattern and complies with the minimum depth requirement
established by the Zoning Bylaw for the depth of R-3 lots. b. Schedule B & C of the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw -Road Standards: Schedule “B” establishes
the required road right-of-way width. The variances requested are as follows for: Urban Standard Minor Streets -from 18 metres to 15.5 metres, Lanes -from 7.5 metres to 6 metres.
-4 - Schedule “C” -District of Maple Ridge Standard Drawings and Specifications establishes the construction standards. The variance requested will be to achieve the Albion Village
standard. They are: From an 18 metre right of way to a 15.5 metre right-of-way and from a 8.6 metre pavement width to 8.0 metre pavement width; and From a 7.5 metre lane right of
way to a 6 metre right of way and from 6 metres of pavement width to 5.6 metres of pavement width. These requested variances are consistent with the road standards that have been established
in the surrounding neighbourhood and the properties immediately adjacent to the subject properties. 2. Relaxation requested to the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw Section 601C, E,b,ii “Buildings
and Structures for Accessory Residential Use and Accessory Off-Street Parking Use shall be sited not less than 0.45 metres from an interior side lot line provided that a minimum setback
of 2 metres is maintained for the other side yard”. The applicant is proposing to construct either garages or carports as part of their marketing strategy for the lots. They have requested
a relaxation from 2 metres to 1.8 metres for the interior side yard in order to provide a wider garage which would allow greater maneuverability for access/egress. This variance was
discussed and given support by the Fire Department. The form and character of all of the houses in this subdivision will be the subject to an Intensive Residential Development Permit
that will be reviewed by Council in the near future. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department supports the requested variances to the Subdivision
and Development Servicing Bylaw for the Albion Village Standard. It was noted that the Developer will be required to provide for “no parking” segments on 102A Avenue at the subdivision
servicing stage of the development. Fire Department: The Fire Department is prepared to support the requested variance to the Zoning Bylaw for the interior side yard setback for the
garage/carports from 2 metres to 1.8 metres. e) Alternatives The street abutting both sides of the site has used the Albion Village standard which has dictated the lotting pattern specific
to this site. If the variance to the Subdivision Development and Servicing Bylaw is not approved the applicant will be unable to subdivide the site in accordance with the Albion Village
standard. If the variance to the Zoning Bylaw is not approved the applicant will build garages/carports which are not as wide. This would make the access/egress to the garage more difficult.
-5 -CONCLUSIONS: The requested variances will permit the subdivision to proceed using established road patterns and the garages to be wider making access/egress easier. It is therefore
recommended that this application be approved. "Original signed by Gay McMillan" _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Gay McMillan Planning Technician "Original
signed by Christine Carter" _______________________________________________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" __________________________
_____________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" _______________________________________________
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – Site Plan of proposed variance for the
garage interior side yard
City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley District of Mission FRASER R. ^ DATE: Jun 15, 2012 FILE: 2012-027-RZ BY: PC 24207 102 AVENUE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT 24111 24106 24115 24112 24119 24127 10151 24129 24138 24142 24158 10123 24175 24223 24256 24251 24254 24252 10131 24259 24255 10132 10128 24269 24272 24277 10260 10274 24283
24286 24284 24296 10269 24304 10270 10282 10306 24315 24316 24110 24109 24113 24113 10142 24122 24123 24125 24123 24125 24136 24140 24151 24158 24167 24169 24189 24167 24196 24210 24206
24253 24250 24262 24257 24266 24249 24265 24276 10280 1029224288 24298 10315 24307 24305 10276 10288 24314 24311 24312 24112 24114 24114 24116 24113 10152 24117 24118 24121 24120 24128
10141 24133 24135 24144 1015224155 24154 24180 24165 24170 24183 10130 24183 24210 24219 24225 24252 24259 24263 24284 24295 10293 10305 10312 10318 1032024310 24116 24117 24123 24126
24134 24131 24132 24139 24147 24161 24162 24155 24166 24186 10140 24191 24218 24207 24260 24258 24243 24254 24265 24266 10148 24273 24270 24282 10287 24302 10300 10324 10137 10141 24109
10138 24121 24120 24143 24157 24177 24192 24202 24207 24240 24253 24237 24268 24258 24274 10262 24280 24283 24285 24282 24290 10281 24306 10260 24313 24314 24100 24109 24115 24117 24122
10131 24133 24137 24141 24150 24154 24166 24159 1013324186 24199 24226 24222 24256 24260 24261 24267 101 36 24279 24278 1028624281 24292 10263 10275 10321 10327 24308 10264 10151 24111
24108 24110 24111 24119 24124 24129 10130 10146 10285 24190 24226 24216 24243 24215 24230 24249 10121 10142 24271 24274 24275 24279 24280 24273 102 68 1029824281 24285 24291 24286 10299
24309 10330 24317 10159 24118 24121 24130 24142 10138 24153 24162 10291 24162 24178 24195 24182 24207 24198 24231 24238 24231 10125 24261 24264 24256 24272 24275 24278 24287 24282 24284
24294 24299 10294 101 A AVE. 242 ST. 243 ST. 101 A AVE. 242 B ST. 103 AVE. 102 A AVE. 102 A AVE. 102 B AVE. 102 AVE 243 ST. APNAUT ST. 241 B ST. 102 B AVE. 241A ST. 241 A ST. 242 B
ST. BCP 20970 (P 19526) 17 36 35 16 15 31 16 37 10 41 40 BCP 14595 38 216 29 PARK 2 2837 38 4 LMP 36295 29 42 8 9 5 63 62 36 71 BCP 3493 146 124111 77 2 27 38 PARK 14 15 33 19BCP 3139
P 19526 1 3 20 13 6 30 14 39 54LMP 26LMP 36295 159 20 34 12 1 LMP 35918 66 68 1 108135 137 125 LMP 36295 85 80 25 LMP 51757 LMP 48057 32 (P 19526) A 20 32 408 23 4 4 22 PARK BCP 3300112
10 8 7 23 23 28 50 36295 31 6 18 30 52 19 164 8 43 45 61 12 2347 A 147 26 9 6 20 19377 16 30 17 14 33 11 BCP 3139 PARK 20 BCP 3139 9 24 18 BCP 33001 26 5 BCP 9309 21 14 724 PARK3 LMP
36295 55 32 LMP 35918 BCP 23558 33 35 60 11 13 46 E 1/2 of 2 1 LMP 36295 81 79 34 BCP 2801128 LMP 51757 10 28 BCP 3139 34 34 35 13 35 3343 BCP 10107 BCP 30529 27 1 11 Rem. B 3 13 BCP
14595 BCP 14595 8 10 29 15 48 5 19 40 5156 57 PARK 17 6 10 22 64 2 25 74 134 144109 10 LMP 51757 9 15 11 14 17 36 BCP 3139 34 21 21 31 BCP 1010 BCP 3139 38 316 4 5 BCP 14595 9 25BCP
23558 27LMP 36295 16 18 BCP 23558 10 7 13 26 67 72 BCP 17490 BCP 32285 LMP 34684 145 LMP 36295 136 84 82 76 BCP4026 LMP 48057 26 8 27 29 BCP 28011 30 12 18 44 45 42 24 37 36 25 39 17
5 19 BCP 33001 6 14 12 BCP 930911 25 1 2 27 49 53 41 31 PARK 7 2159 14 1124 36295 P 17126122123110 83 29 5 B 11 12 13 18 31 *PP004 BCP 3139 1 2 BCP 3139 22BCP 28011 3930 28 23 22 2
PARK 15 9 24 BCP 18974 17 3 LMP 35918 44 58 65 LMP 70 69 73 1 LMP 36295 LMP 36295 78 1 \\ SUBJECT PROPERTY SCALE 1:2,000 APPENDIX A ´
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-027-DP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Development Permit 24207 102 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An Intensive Residential Development Permit application has been received for the subject site located at 24207 102 Avenue
for the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zoned lots. The site is located within the Albion Area plan and has a land use designation of Medium Density Residential. The Intensive
Residential Development Permit provides a greater emphasis on high standards in aesthetics and quality of the built environment, with the intent to provide an environment that is safe,
attractive, people-friendly. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-027-DP respecting property located at 24207 102 Avenue. DISCUSSION: a) Background
Context Applicant: CIPE Homes Inc. Owner: Paul Kaczan Legal Description: Lot: B, Section 3, Township 12, Plan: BCP9309 OCP : Existing: Medium Density Residential Proposed: Medium Density
Residential Zoning: Existing: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Designation: Medium Density Residential South: Use: Conservation Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Conservation
1108
-2 -East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Designation: Medium Density Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-3 (Special
Amenity Residential District) Designation: Medium Density Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area:
0.816 ha (2 acres) Access: from the lane off of 241A Street Servicing: Full Urban Standard Previous Applications: RZ, SD, DP & VP/062/03 and 2012-SD, DP a) Project Description: The
subject property is located within the Albion Area Plan and is developing in accordance with the established neighbourhood and road pattern. It was part of a larger parcel which was
rezoned in 2004; at that time the north portion was subdivided into 25 lots, leaving the home site on this 0.861 ha parcel which fronts onto 102 Avenue. An application has now been
received to subdivide the remainder into 27 lots under the R-3 zone (Special Amenity Residential District), which permits lots not less than 213 m2. A copy of the subdivision geometry
is attached (Appendix D). The development of the site will connect 102A Avenue and the lane off of 102 Avenue through the site. This will improve pedestrian and traffic movement through
the area. b) Planning Analysis: An Intensive Residential Development Permit is required for all new Intensive Residential development in an area with an Area Plan. Residential development
at densities greater than 30 units per net hectare that is typically zoned R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) is considered as intensive residential. The Section 8.8 Intensive
Residential Development Permit Area Guidelines of the Official Community Plan aim to provide a greater emphasis on high standards in aesthetics, with the intent to provide an environment
that is safe, attractive, people-friendly and environmentally responsive. The key guideline concepts for the development permit area are as follows: 1. Neighbourhood cohesiveness and
connectivity should be maintained through the design of varied yet compatible buildings, in materials used and in architectural styles, in landscapes and in recreational areas, and
by facilitating a range of transportation choices. Six different building types with variations in the detail finishes and 8 different colour schemes will ensure that identical buildings
will not be adjacent to each other. The building design elements, materials and colour schemes, which are proposed to be along a heritage theme, will compliment the adjacent single
family development. A plan showing one of the building’s design elements and front yard landscaping is attached (Appendix B). The site is in close proximity to a Tot Lot and the future
Jackson Farm Park; Albion Elementary School is located approximately .6 km from the site.
-3 -2. A vibrant street presence is to be maintained through a variety of housing styles, by maintaining street parking and by directing garage structures and off-street parking to the
rear of a property accessible by a lane. For visual interest, there are different building finishes and the identical building design will not be repeated within 3 adjacent lots. A
Streetscape illustrating the variety of building designs is attached (Appendix C). The project will provide lane access to either a two car garage or carport. c) Requested Variances:
Development Variance Permit application 2012-027-VP has been received to request to reduce the required interior side yard for the garages from 2 metres to 1.8 metres in order to facilitate
wider garages. Additional variances are requested to vary the road right-of-way widths and carriageway widths of the roads to be consistent with the intent of the Albion Area Plan.
These variances are discussed further in application 2011-052-VP which is also before Council for consideration. d) Financial Implications: There will be approximately 18 trees added
to the municipal street tree inventory on completion of the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zoned lots of this project. The costs associated with maintaining these trees
will need to be included in a subsequent operating budget. CONCLUSION: This proposal conforms to the OCP’s Albion Area Plan, the Intensive Residential DP Area Guidelines, and the neighbourhoods’
existing lot and road pattern and housing form. Therefore, this development is considered an “infill” project and it is recommended that the Development Permit be approved. "Original
signed by Charles R. Goddard" _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Gay McMillan Planning Technician "Original signed by Christine Carter" ____________________________________
_________ Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA,
P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" _______________________________________________ Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative
Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A – Subject Map Appendix B – An Elevation Plan and front yard landscape plan
-4 -Appendix C – Streetscape Appendix D – Proposed Subdivision geometry
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: E02-010-174 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Local Area Service – 11160 234A Street Paving EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Over the past two years, District staff and residents have worked together to explore options for paving the
top lift of the Kanaka Village strata road; a deficiency remaining from a developer that went bankrupt prior to completing all the private servicing work associated with the townhouses.
A solution to this issue has been found whereby the District would finance the cost of the final lift of asphalt and the strata would pay these costs back through a Local Area Service
(LAS). Typically, LAS’s are not approved for the provision of services on private lands. Although the strata road is a private facility servicing 28 units, it is also a right-of-way
(ROW) accessed by District staff for the maintenance of a District owned sanitary sewer. The 28 residents have filed a valid formal petition, of which 100% have signed, and Council
direction is sought regarding preparation of a bylaw to establish an LAS. RECOMMENDATIONS: THAT staff be authorized to prepare a bylaw to establish a Local Area Service to provide the
top lift of asphalt to 11160 234A Street; and THAT the capital program be amended to include the paving. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: In 2005, a development application at the
corner of 234A Street and Kanaka Way was received for the construction of both single family lots and a strata multi-family complex. The subdivision and rezoning applications were completed
in 2005/2006 and securities received for all the off-site municipal servicing. The strata building permit was subsequently received in 2007 and final construction completed in 2008.
Prior to the acceptance of the municipal services and issuance of final occupancy, the original developer declared bankruptcy and did not complete the project deficiencies that had
been identified. A new developer arranged a private deal to take over the single family portion of the project and completed the remaining municipal deficiencies. The private deficiencies
however remained with the original developer including the top lift of asphalt on the strata road and were never completed. 1109
May 2010, the strata requested that the projects securities be used to complete the final lift of asphalt. They were informed that the District only takes securities for the provision
of the municipally owned and maintained services and could not legally reassign the securities to complete works not included in the agreement. The securities were subsequently returned
to the new developer who completed all the municipal service deficiencies. In 2011, the strata was informed to arrange for the final inspection of the units, provision of Schedules
A/B and to pave the final lift of asphalt prior to the issuance of final occupancy for the strata units. In 2012, the strata contacted the District again to request that the strata
road be included in the annual capital program. While they were again made aware that it was not the responsibility of the District to complete the private works, staff agreed to review
other avenues. One approach considered is a LAS as the District has an interest in the strata road due to the access easement registered on title for the maintenance of the municipal
sanitary sewer. Following discussions with legal counsel it was determined that a LAS would be an acceptable approach to paving the road. In lieu of the preliminary petition, the LAS
approach was presented to the strata council and they agreed to proceed to the cost estimate and a formal petition stage. On April 13, 2012 the formal petition and cost estimate to
pave the final lift of asphalt to serve 28 units in Kanaka Village (shown on the attached sketch 1) were prepared and circulated to residents. On May 2, 2012, the formal petition was
returned and the Corporate Officer has determined that the formal petition is sufficient and valid. A total of 100% of the number of properties with a value of 100% of total land and
improvements signed the petition. b) Strategic Alignment: The Corporate Strategic Plan includes financial management and environment as strategic focus areas. The financial management
focus area encourages the continuation of a user-pay philosophy and the provision of high quality municipal services to our citizens and customers in a cost effective and efficient
manner. This project meets these objectives. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Costs of the final lift of asphalt have been estimated at $24,484.88, to be shared equally among the 28
existing units (the per property cost amounts to $874.46). The owners will be offered the option to either pay the ‘commuted’ cost or have the cost placed on the tax roll and amortized
over a period of 15 years at the interest rate agreed to, with the eligibility of paying off anytime during the term without incurring a penalty. This service will provide a 5.5m wide
top lift of asphalt for approximately 310m length of strata road. As this is a private road any future maintenance or repaving are the responsibility of the strata. The unit charge
is based on an equal division of the total paving cost. d) Interdepartmental Implications: When the construction of the service is completed, the Finance Department will confirm the
actual costs, impose the agreed costs as a levy and place the notation on the tax roll of the benefiting property owner.
e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The project will be financed initially from the Local Improvement Revenue. The construction cost of the project will be borne by the owner and
any municipal contribution will be provided by the Local Improvement Revenue. f) Policy Implications: The LAS process was established to assist residents with the construction of municipal
services in support of community needs. The strata road identified in this LAS however is private property in support of the 28 units and would typically not meet the LAS criteria.
The District however through legal opinion has determined that this will not set a precedence as the District has a ROW registered on title over the road for access to maintain the
municipal sewer which is intended to service future developments if necessary. As a result of the circumstances of this case, mechanisms are being explored with legal counsel to enable
securities to be held by the District for deficiencies internally within a strata development. g) Alternatives: An alternative to address the final lift of asphalt is to not participate
in LAS but rather that the residents hire a contractor to pave the road. CONCLUSION: The top lift of asphalt has been requested by the residents of Kanaka Village through a formal LAS
Petition. Approval to prepare a bylaw to establish an LAS to provide the top lift of asphalt to 28 lots in Kanaka Village is recommended. _______________________________________________
Prepared by: Stephen Judd, PEng. Manager of Infrastructure and Development _______________________________________________ Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng. Municipal Engineer ______________________
_________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. General Manager: Public Works & Development Services _______________________________________________ Concurrence: J.L.
(Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer SJ/mi "Original signed by Stephen Judd" "Original signed by David Pollock" "Original signed by Frank Quinn" "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
2335923359 23358 2332823328 23350 23331 11135 11125 2337723377 2339023390 2342223422 23419 11155 23437 2337123371 2336623366 2340123401 2341323413 11120 2337623376 2338323383 2338223382
2331223312 23403 2340723407 11145 2343023430 11160 23336 23342 2333723337 2339123391 2340623406 23427 2336523365 2338923389 2339823398 23385 2334523345 2332523325 2341923419 2342523425
2343123431 2332023320 11165 2331723317 2341423414 23411 234 A ST. GRIFFEN ROAD GRIFF EN ROAD KANAKA WAY KANAKA WAY PROJECT LOCATION 11160 234A ST PROJECT MAP: Top Lift of Asphalt, 11160
234A Street
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: E08-015-940 E01-052-001 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING:
C of W SUBJECT: Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 151/12 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A developer has subdivided land at 124 Avenue and 203 Street. Part of the subdivision servicing
is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local Government Act. The extended servicing benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC 151/12 provides
the municipality’s assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or extended servicing to the benefiting lands. RECOMMENDATION: That with respect to the subdivision of lands
involved in subdivision SD 013/01 located at 124 Avenue and 203 Street, be it resolved: 1. That the cost to provide the excess or extended services are, in whole or in part, excessive
to the municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall be paid by the owners of the land being subdivided, and 2. That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or
extended services on the parcels and in the amounts as set out in the staff report dated June 18, 2012; and further 3. That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Excess
Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 151/12 with the subdivider of the said lands. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The attached map identifies the lands which are involved in the subdivision
and those which will benefit from the excess or extended services. The cost breakdown for each excess or extended service is shown on attached Schedule A. In addition, a copy of Excess
Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 151/12 is also attached for information purposes. 1110
b) Strategic Alignment: Administration of excess or extended services legislation complies with the Smart Managed Growth element of the Corporate Strategic Plan. The administration procedure
supports the requirement for a developer to construct municipal infrastructure in support of land development and recognizes that the infrastructure may provide benefit to other land.
c) Policy Implications: Part 26, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all or part of the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality
shall determine the proportion of the cost of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and determine the proportion of the cost of the service to be attributed to parcels
of land which the municipality considers will benefit from the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 151/12 will provide such determination for Subdivision SD 013/01. CONCLUSION: A developer
has provided certain services in support of Subdivision SD 013/01. Some of the services benefit adjacent lands therefore, it is appropriate to impose Latecomer Charges on the benefitting
lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 151/12 summarizes the municipality’s determination of benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the term over which such Latecomer Charges
will be applied. Prepared by: Stephen Judd, PEng. Manager of Infrastructure Development Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng. Municipal Engineer Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. GM:
Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer TG/mc "Original signed by Stephen Judd" "Original signed by David Pollock" "Original signed
by Frank Quinn" "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
Page 1 Schedule A TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE 1. EXTENDED NOMINAL SERVICE SERVICE # BENEFITTING LOTS COST OF BENEFIT COST PER LOT BENEFIT ATTRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING SUBDIVISION
Sanitary Sewer 5 $48,600.00 $9,720.00 Lot 80 Plan 40628 124 Avenue RN 21161-0203-0 3x $9,720.00 A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows: Lot 80
DL263 GP 1 NWD Plan 40628 $29,160.00
Page 1 of 3 EXCESS CAPACITY LATECOMER AGREEMENT LC 151/12 -SD 013/01 THIS AGREEMENT made the day of , 2012: BETWEEN: Simon J. Rogers & Jennifer M. Rogers 306 Mariner Way Coquitlam, BC
V3K 1N6 (Hereinafter called the “Subdivider”) OF THE FIRST PART AND: CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under the “Local Government Act”, having its
offices at 11995 Haney Place, in the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia (Hereinafter called the “Municipality”) OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS: A. The Subdivider
has subdivided certain lands and premises located within the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more particularly known and described as: Lot 79 DL
263 GP1 NWD Plan 40628 (Hereinafter called the “said lands”) B. In order to facilitate the approval of the subdivision of the said lands, the Subdivider has constructed and installed
the sanitary sewer shown on the design prepared by D.K. Bowins and Associates Inc., titled: Sanitary Sewer 124 Avenue, 203 Street to 50m West, Revision 1, (Sheets 1 of 1), dated February
14, 2006. Municipal Project No. E08-015-940. (Hereinafter called the “Extended Services”); C. The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands and
other than the said lands; D. The Municipality considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive; E. The Subdivider has provided the Extended Services in the Amount
of $48,600.00.
Page 2 of 3 F. The Municipality has determined that: Lot 80 DL263 Group 1 NWD Plan 40628 RN 21161-0203-0 (the “Benefitting Lands”) will benefit from the Extended Services; G. The Municipality
has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands connecting to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the “Latecomer Charge”) on the Benefitting Lands in the following
amounts: Lot 80 DL263 Group 1 NWD Plan 40628 RN 21161-0203-0 $9,720.00 per lot to a maximum of $29,160.00 for use of the sanitary sewer on 124 Avenue, plus interest calculated annually
from the date of completion of the Extended Services as certified by the General Manager – Public Works and Development Services of the Municipality (the “Completion Date”) to the date
of connection by the Benefitting Lands to the Extended Services; H. The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality shall pursuant
to Section 939 (7) of the Municipal Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 be paid to the Subdivider as provided for in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 939 (9) of the Local
Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 323, The parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality within
fifteen (15) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to the Subdivider and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of June 30th and December 31st of the year in which the
Latecomer Charge is collected by the Municipality. 2. This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer
Charge by the Municipality to the Subdivider, or fifteen (15) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the Municipality shall be forever fully released and wholly discharged from
any and all liability and obligations herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer Charge, and whether arising before or after the expiry of this Agreement. 3. The Subdivider
represents and warrants to the Municipality that the Subdivider has not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from the owner of the Benefitting Lands
for the provision, or expectation of the provision of the Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein; and further represents and warrants that he has not
entered into any agreement with the owner of the Benefitting Lands for consideration in any way related to or connected directly or indirectly with the provision of the Extended Services.
The
Page 3 of 3 representations and warranties of the Subdivider herein shall, notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Agreement, survive the expiry of this Agreement. 4. The Subdivider (if
more than one corporate body or person) hereby agrees that the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in equal shares. 5. If the Subdivider is
a sole corporate body or person, the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the following (name and address of director
of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.): 6. In the event that the Subdivider is not the owner of the said lands, the owner shall hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto
the Subdivider, his heirs and assigns, all rights, title and interest under this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective Corporate Seals,
attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf, the day and year first above written. SUBDIVIDER Subdivider -Authorized Signatory Subdivider -Authorized
Signatory DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Corporate Officer -Authorized Signatory
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: E02-010-161 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Award of Contract No. ITT-EN12-55 122 Avenue Road and Walkability Improvements (216 Street to 222 Street) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 122 Avenue Road Improvements Project from 216
Street to 222 Street is in the District’s approved Capital Program. The project objectives are to improve multi-modal transportation for the corridor by providing improvements to pedestrian
and cycling facility, and provide traffic calming measures with curb extensions and traffic circles. Currently, pedestrians are walking along the existing gravel shoulder and there
are many students using the roadway to get to the Secondary School on 122 Avenue. The project scope consists of concrete curb and gutter and asphalt multi-use path on both sides of
the roadway, catch basins and lawn basins, three traffic buttons (small traffic circles), curb extensions, and new pavement markings. Pavement rehabilitation that was scheduled in 2010
is now included in the 2012 proposed roadworks. Overall the project aims at improving walkability, traffic safety and cycling mobility. Additional funds for the project were included
in the 2012 adopted Financial Plan. Tenders for construction closed on June 4, 2012 with eight (8) bids received. The lowest compliant bid of $1,229,570.00 excluding taxes was submitted
by Imperial Paving Limited. The consultant, Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd. has analyzed the tenders and recommend that the contract be awarded to Imperial Paving Limited. The project
is within budget and construction is anticipated to commence in July 2012 and anticipated to be completed in approximately 12 weeks. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Contract ITT-EN12-55, 122 Avenue
Road Improvements (216 Street to 222 Street), be awarded to Imperial Paving Limited in the amount of $1,229,570.00 plus applicable taxes; and THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized
to execute the contract. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Mountainview Crescent (122 Avenue) east of 216 Street is a collector road and bike route that is currently approximately
8.5m wide with 2 paved travel lanes. The existing road is wider in front of the Maple Ridge Secondary School to allow for parking on both sides and there is existing concrete curb and
sidewalks in the vicinity of the school. Beyond the school, pedestrians currently walk along the gravel shoulders on 122 Avenue. 1111
The 122 Avenue Road Improvements project identified a need to improve the facilities on this route for pedestrians and cycling so as to promote the use of other modes of transportation.
There have also been comments about speeding on this roadway resulting in the proposed traffic calming. The project scope involves construction of concrete curb and gutter and a 2.0m
wide asphalt multi-use path on both sides of 122 Avenue from 216 Street to 222 Street for a total length of approximately 1.2 kilometers. To improve safety, three traffic buttons (similar
to traffic circles) and curb extensions will be constructed, new cross walks will be painted, and new traffic control signs will be placed. There will be storm sewer work consisting
of catch basins and lawn basins connecting to the existing storm sewer in the roadway. A new section of storm sewer east of 221 Street is also required. The existing road is showing
signs of pavement distress including alligator and edge cracks. Based on the geotechnical engineer’s recommendation, the existing road will be rehabilitated by grinding out the existing
asphalt pavement and repaving with new pavement structure. This will allow the road base and sub base to remain in place preventing a total road failure. To allow for settlement of
the storm sewer cross trenches, the top lift of asphalt pavement will be deferred until 2013 during the overlay program. The completed works with new curb and gutter from 216 Street
to 222 Street will permit parking only at designated areas by the school and east of York Street on the south side. In the summer of 2011, Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd. completed
the design of the 122 Avenue Road Improvements Project and prepared a construction cost estimate. The estimated cost exceeded the project budget and therefore did not proceed to the
tender stage. Additional funding for the project was budgeted and approved by Council in the 2012 Capital Budget. The tender drawings and documents were updated and the project was
tendered on May 10, 2012. Tender results Tenders closed on June 4, 2012 with eight tenders received as listed below from lowest to highest price. Tender Price (excluding taxes) Imperial
Paving Limited $1,229,570.00 Wilco Civil Inc. $1,284,800.00 Columbia Bitulithic (Lafarge Canada Inc.) $1,350,260.00 TAG Construction Ltd. $1,420,125.00 Marv's Excavating Ltd. $1,465,319.00
Winvan Paving Ltd. $1,565,070.00 B & B Contracting Ltd. $1,635,600.00 Jack Cewe Ltd. $1,645,994.00 Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd. has analyzed all tenders and recommend that Imperial
Paving Limited be awarded the contract. District staff has also reviewed the tenders and concur with the recommendation. b) Desired Outcome: The desired outcome of this report is to
obtain Council’s approval to award the contract and construct during the summer school break to minimize the impact to the public.
c) Strategic Alignment: The 122 Avenue Road Improvements Project supports the following key strategies identified in the District’s Strategic Plan: Maintain and enhance a multi-modal
transportation system within Maple Ridge to provide citizens with safe, efficient alternatives for the movement of individuals and goods Promote alternative modes (pedestrian, bike,
public transit) of travel to reduce reliance on the automobile d) Citizens/Customer Implications: There have been three Open Houses hosted for this project. The last Open House was
held on May 3, 2012 to present the detailed design drawings and anticipated construction schedule. The comments from the Open Houses were generally positive. Most of the comments were
property specific such as impact to driveway access and hedges. Some residents also commented on the traffic and parking challenges during school drop-off times. District staff will
monitor this issue after completion of the proposed improvements to determine its effectiveness. The estimated construction duration is approximately 12 weeks, starting in July 2012.
It is anticipated that traffic through the work zone will be reduced to single lane alternating. e) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering staff have reviewed the traffic circle
design with the Fire Department and addressed their concerns for fire truck turning movements. The Operations Department has provided input during the design stage. A District staff
inspector will provide inspection services during construction. f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The 122 Avenue Road Improvements Project is funded under LTC 8305 and 8546,
with a total budget of $1,575,000 including $155,600 from grants. The projected expenditures are within budget. 2011 Construction Cost at 216 Street Intersection Current miscellaneous
expenditures Consultant fees up to construction 2012 Construction Cost (low bid) Taxes on construction Contract Administration and Inspection Contingency (5%) Total Projected Project
Cost $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 72,398 2,797 104,807 1,229,570 21,518 80,290 61,480 1,572,860
CONCLUSIONS: The tender price of $1,229,570.00 excluding taxes, by Imperial Paving Limited for the 122 Avenue Road Improvement Project from 216 Street to 222 Street is the lowest tendered
price. Council approval to award the work to Imperial Paving Limited is recommended. “Original signed by Richard Wong” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Richard
Wong, PEng. Manager of Design & Construction “Original signed by Trevor Thompson” _______________________________________________ Financial review by: Trevor Thompson, CGA Manager of
Financial Planning “Original signed by David Pollock” _______________________________________________ Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng. Municipal Engineer “Original signed by Frank
Quinn” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. General Manager: Public Works & Development Services “Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule”
_______________________________________________ Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT:
Lava Room Dining and Lounge -Liquor License Application – Entertainment Endorsement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB) has received an application from
the Lava Room Dining and Lounge at 101-22590 Dewdney Trunk Road, for an entertainment endorsement that will run in conjunction with their existing food primary liquor license. The purpose
of the application for patron participation entertainment endorsement is to provide entertainment service to their customers on an occasional basis. There is no plans to provide ongoing
entertainment but rather to only have the ability to provide entertainment such as karaoke or some other small forms of entertainment for their dining guests from time to time throughout
the year. One of the considerations utilized by the LCLB in reviewing an application such as this is a resolution from the local government. Council has three choices. Municipalities
can provide a resolution to LCLB based upon a number of regulatory criteria addressed in a Council resolution as well as comments pertaining to the views expressed by area residents.
Council has three choices. Council may choose to support the application, not support the application or indicate that they have no comment. Staff have reviewed the area surrounding
the subject site and found that the business is surrounded by other commercial businesses that either close at 6:00 p.m. or are similar type establishments to themselves that are also
open later on weekends. There does not appear to be any residential areas that would be negatively affected by this minor change to the Liquor Licence for the Lava Room Dining and Lounge.
Therefore it does not appear to be any necessity to go the expense of seeking the public input on this particular application. Instead, this appears to be an example of a situation
where Council should use their authority to opt out of commenting on an application. The LCLB advises this will not have a negative impact on the application itself. RECOMMENDATION(S):
That Council opt out of commenting on the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch Application for Patron Participation Entertainment at the Lava Room Dining and Lounge at 101 – 22590 Dewdney
Trunk Road, Maple Ridge. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The original application was submitted in November of 2010 however it was missing some integral information from the application
for the LCLB and the District to proceed and was returned to the applicant for further information submission. 1112
In the past when liquor licence applications have been received staff has established a procedure for sending out information on the application to the general public in the vicinity
of the applicant’s location by predefining a specific area and sending out specific name and addressed letters to residents within that area to determine if there are any problems or
concerns regarding the application. The parking and access to the site are also checked. Advertisements are placed in the local newspapers to ensure anyone who may have an interest
in the application is notified. A specific time frame is given for response. Once all the information is received a report is submitted to Council with a recommendation that is then
referred to the LCLB. b) Citizen/Customer Implications: The subject business has been in operation in the same location since 2007 and there has been no complaints filed against the
business operation. The application before Council is a minor change to their current business practice. c) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Should Council decide to not comment
on this minor amendment there will be a financial impact to the municipality The estimated costs to obtain public comment on the subject application is in the area of $1,000.00 that
includes the cost of materials, postage, newspaper costs and staff resources. These are all required for the public input requirement for LCLB. d) Alternatives: To not approve this
recommendation and to request the LCLB provide additional time to the District to seek public input. CONCLUSIONS: Since this is a minor alteration to the existing business operation
it is recommended that Council approve the recommendation to opt out of providing comments to the LCLB and allow this application to proceed through the remaining of the Liquor Board
processing. The expenditure of municipal funds to seek public input on this minor change does not appear to be of value to the District at this time. “Original signed by E.S. (Liz)
Holitzki” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: E. S. (Liz) Holitzki Director: Licences, Permits and Bylaws “Original signed by Frank Quinn” __________________________________
________ Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng General Manager, Public Works & Development Services “Original signed J.L. (Jim) Rule” __________________________________________ Concurrence:
J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer
Page 1 of 2 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: June 18, 2012 And Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole
SUBJECT: 2011 Annual Report and 2011 Statement of Financial Information EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 2011 Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with Section 98 of the Community Charter
and Municipal Council is required to formally receive this report before June 30. A major component of the report is the 2011 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. These statements
were presented to Council at the April 16 Committee of the Whole Meeting and Council passed a resolution formally accepting the statements at the April 24 Council meeting. The 2011
Annual Report will be submitted to the Government Finance Officers Association for consideration for the Canadian Award for Financial Reporting, an award the District has received for
the past twenty one years. Under the Financial Information Act, the District is required to file a Statement of Financial Information with the Province of British Columbia prior to
June 30 each year. This report must approved by Council and the Corporate Finance Officer. RECOMMENDATION: That the 2011 Annual Report be received as required by the Community Charter.
That the Statement of Financial Information be approved as required by the Financial Information Act. DISCUSSION: The 2011 Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with Section
98 of the Community Charter. As required in the Charter, the report contains our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements; a Progress Report detailing municipal objectives and progress
toward their achievement; a Development Cost Charges report showing collections and expenditures for each component; information about the services provided by Municipal Departments;
and lists the Permissive Tax Exemptions awarded for the 2011 fiscal year. The report was made available for public inspection on June 4 and notice posted in the local newspaper as required
by Section 94 of the Charter indicating that the report is being presented at the Council meeting of June 26. The District of Maple Ridge has been a recipient of the Canadian Award
for Financial Reporting for the past twenty one years. This award is presented by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) to recognize Municipalities that publish high quality
financial reports that are easily readable, efficiently organized and clearly community the government’s financial picture. The 2011 Annual Report will be submitted to the GFOA for
consideration for this year’s award. In addition to the Annual Report required by the Community Charter, the District of Maple Ridge is required to publish an annual Statement of Financial
Information (SOFI) under the Financial Information Act. This report must be approved by Council and the Corporate Finance Officer, and filed with the Province of British Columbia prior
to June 30, 2012. 1131
Page 2 of 2 The SOFI is attached for your review and approval. The package consists of: A completed checklist A statement of assets and liabilities An operational statement A
schedule of debt A schedule of guarantee and indemnity agreements A schedule of remuneration and expenses A schedule of disbursements to supplies of goods or services A statement
of cash flow A statement of change in net financial assets Notes to the financial statements A statement of change in equity in capital assets A statement of severance agreements
A statement of approval of the financial information submitted A management report Citizen/Customer Implications: The Annual Report and the SOFI provide additional information to
the residents of Maple Ridge and the general public, contributing to Council’s commitment to transparency. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to June 30 of each year council is required to receive
the District’s Annual Report in accordance with Section 98 of the Community Charter and to approve the Statement of Financial Information in accordance with the Financial Information
Act. It should ben noted that a detailed presentation on our 2011 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements was provided at the April 16 Committee of the Whole meeting and Council passed
a resolution formally accepting the statements at the April 24 Council meeting. The Statement of Financial Information is attached and the Annual Report is available for viewing on
the District of Maple Ridge website. _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Catherine Nolan, CGA Manager of Accounting _______________________________________________
Approved by: Paul Gill, CGA GM: Corporate and Financial Services _______________________________________________ Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer "Original
signed by Paul Gill" "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" "Original signed by Catherine Nolan"
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE 2011 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Financial Information Act Financial Information Regulation (FIR), Schedule 1 Statement of Financial Information (SOFI) Index to FIR Schedule 1 and the Checklist Page 1: Corporation Information
Ministry Information General: Section One 1(1)(a) Statement of assets and liabilities 1(1)(b) Operational statement 1(1)(c) Schedule of debts 1(1)(d) Schedule of guarantee and indemnity
agreements 1(1)(e) Schedule of employee remuneration and expenses 1(1)(f) Schedule of suppliers of goods and services 1(2) [Explanatory information for reference] 1(3) Statements prepared
on a consolidated basis or for each fund 1(4) & (5) Notes to the statements and schedules in section 1(1) Page 2: Statement of Assets & Liabilities: Section Two 2 Balance sheet Changes
in equity and surplus or deficit Operational Statement: Section Three 3(1) Statement of Income /Statement of Revenue and Expenditures Statement of Changes in Financial Position 3(2)
& (3) Omission of Statement of Changes in Financial Position, with explanation 3(4) Requirement for community colleges, school districts and municipalities Statement of Debts: Section
Four 4(1)(a) & 4(2) List and detail the schedule of long-term debts 4(1)(b) Identify debts covered by sinking funds /reserves 4(3) & (4) Omission of schedule, with explanation Page
3: Schedule of Guarantee and Indemnity Agreements: Section Five 5(1) List agreements under the Guarantees and Indemnities Regulation 5(2) State the entities and amounts involved 5(3)
& (4) Omission of schedule, with explanation Page 3 & 4: Schedule of Remuneration and Expenses: Section Six 6(1) [Definitions for reference] 6(2)(a) List remuneration /expenses for
each elected official, member of board, Cabinet appointees 6(2)(b) List each employee with remuneration exceeding $75,000, plus expenses 6(2)(c) Consolidated total for all employees
with remuneration of $75,000 or less 6(2)(d) Reconcile difference in total remuneration above with operational statement 6(3) Exclude personal information other than as required Index
1
Index 2 Page 3 & 4: Schedule of Remuneration and Expenses: Section Six (continued) 6(4) & (5) [Explanatory information for reference] 6(6) Report employer portion of EI and CPP as a
supplier payment 6(7)(a) & (b) Statement of severance agreements 6(8) Explain an omission of statement of severance agreements 6(9) [Statement of severance agreements to minister –
not required unless requested] Page 4: Schedule of Suppliers of Goods or Services: Section Seven 7(1)(a) List suppliers receiving payments exceeding $25,000 7(1)(b) Consolidated total
of all payments of $25,000 or less 7(1)(c) Reconcile difference in total above with operational statement 7(2)(a) [Explanatory information for reference] 7(2)(b) Statement of payments
of grants or contributions 7(2)(c) [Explanatory information for reference] Page 5: Inactive Corporations: Section Eight 8(1) Ministry to report for inactive corporations 8(2)(a) Contents
of report – statements and schedules under section 1(1) to extent possible 8(2)(b) Contents of report – operational status of corporation Approval of Financial Information: Section
Nine 9(1) Approval of SOFI for corporations (other than municipalities) 9(2) Approval of SOFI for municipalities 9(3) Management report 9(4) Management report must explain roles and
responsibilities 9(5) Signature approval is for all contents of the SOFI Access to the Financial Information: Section Ten 10(1) to (3) [Explanatory information for reference]
"This organization has no guarantees or indemnities under the Guarantees and Indemnities Regulation." The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule
of Guarantee and Indemnity Agreements for 2011 Prepared pursuant to the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (d)
1 Elected Officials Name Position Remuneration Benefits Expenses Ashlie, Cheryl Councillor 42,976.21 $ 1,653.24 2,001.55 Bell, Corisa Councillor 2,290.97 $ 121.00 35.61 Daykin, Ernest
Mayor 99,615.56 $ 1,808.52 1,918.16 Dueck, Judy Councillor 42,869.76 $ 1,509.24 696.31 Hogarth, Al Councillor 42,834.10 $ 1,509.24 1,662.99 King, Linda Councillor 40,188.36 $ 100.68
4,640.21 Masse, Robert Councillor 2,290.97 $ 109.00 35.61 Morden, Michael Councillor 43,189.28 $ 1,509.24 2,182.98 Speirs, Craig Councillor 40,543.28 $ 201.24 6,283.55 Totals 356,798.49
8,521.40 19,456.97 2 Other Employees (excluding those listed in Part 1 above) Name Position Remuneration Expenses Acharya, Rasika Planner II $86,811.62 $839.80 Armour, Douglas M. Firefighter,
Acting Lieutenant $104,902.42 $300.00 Armstrong, Fred Manager Corporate Communications $104,975.83 $969.89 Balatti, Christa Recreation Manager, Health & Wellness $99,511.73 $559.05
Barrett, Kevin G. Firefighter $94,303.12 $2,654.45 Bastaja, John Chief Information Officer $132,800.19 $176.44 Bayley, Christopher C. Fire Captain $114,216.27 $245.00 Benson, Laura
Manager of Sustainability & Corp Planning $107,713.63 $1,456.54 Bevilacqua, Jim Fire Captain $120,469.87 $273.00 Blue, Sandra Manager Strategic Economic Initiatives $106,968.44 $8,974.04
Boag, David Director, Parks & Facilities $141,541.55 $756.63 Bonifazi, Marco Firefighter $79,489.87 $0.00 Bruce, Robert Firefighter $87,153.82 $16.28 Bryszewski, Sebastian Firefighter
$79,860.12 $130.18 Burrell, Lorne Trades Foreman $79,090.47 $80.00 Butler, Mary Firefighter $83,126.14 $281.01 Carmichael, Russ Director, Engineering Operations $142,676.76 $4,782.36
Carter, Christine Manager of Community Planning $122,939.88 $504.32 Christensen, Robert Fire Captain $101,653.06 $0.00 Cooke, David GIS Coordinator $101,774.96 $2,529.11 Cote-Rolvink,
Stephen J. Manager of Inspection Services $107,043.64 $3,052.45 Cotroneo, Tony Recreation Manager, Youth & Neighbourhood Serv $87,528.76 $112.65 Cotter, Steve Firefighter $92,538.58
$150.00 Crabtree, Christina L. Information Services Manager $106,043.65 $31.41 Cramb, Donald B. Senior Recreation Manager, Pitt Meadows Area $116,207.59 $1,519.46 Davis, Craig Firefighter
$87,459.69 $0.00 Davis, Jeff Firefighter $85,914.53 $0.00 Denton, Darrell E. Business Retention & Expansion Officer $75,818.19 $4,372.21 Dickson, Janet Senior Analyst Programmer $80,436.40
$3,694.51 Dingwall, William J. Manager of Utility Engineering $121,178.89 $1,852.85 Eng, Michael Traffic & Transportation Technologist $81,423.04 $991.79 for 2011 The Corporation of
the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing the Remuneration and Expenses Paid to or on Behalf of Each Employee Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation,
Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (e) and Section 6 (2) (a-d), (3) (b) and Section (6)
for 2011 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing the Remuneration and Expenses Paid to or on Behalf of Each Employee Ettinger, Glenn
Firefighter $88,225.43 $0.00 Exner, Howard Fire Assistant Chief, Training & Operations $133,016.44 $1,508.92 Franklin, Steven Fire Captain $104,797.77 $0.00 Gaudette, Christopher Firefighter
$83,705.96 $0.00 Gill, Paul GM, Corporate & Financial Services $193,554.16 $5,980.76 Gjaltema, Michael Tradesperson II, Electrician $81,107.65 $61.71 Glasgow, Ian Firefighter $82,122.77
$225.00 Goddard, Charles Manager of Development & Environmental Services $127,358.95 $127.35 Gormley, Kathleen Manager of Business Systems $105,854.96 $2,955.76 Grootendorst, Peter
Fire Chief, Director Fire Oper. & Staff Development $148,166.54 $9,039.28 Guerra, Maria Senior Project Engineer $99,563.63 $536.53 Guy, Ronald Engineering Works Inspector $77,402.40
$205.53 Hall, Diana Planner II $86,703.48 $1,507.92 Hansen, Damon Firefighter $84,247.67 $80.00 Harcus, David Fire Captain $107,228.85 $0.00 Hardy, Wayne Superintendent Roads & Equipment
$107,390.09 $2,456.92 Harrison, Caroline Network Analyst $75,585.00 $7,435.40 Harwood, Kevin Fire Captain $114,825.23 $0.00 Hayes, Stephen Foreman II $80,103.83 $719.63 Holitzki, Elizabeth
Director Licences, Permits & Bylaws $143,307.23 $3,980.85 Hopper, Clinton Firefighter $87,700.01 $0.00 Jonat, Cameron Firefighter $94,624.93 $90.00 Jones, Maureen Senior Manager of
Police Services, Finance & Admin $99,801.93 $0.00 Jorde, Shelley Recreation Manager Community Connections $110,104.44 $197.68 Judd, Stephen Manager of Infrastructure Development $103,808.85
$654.17 Juoksu, Paul Building Inspector I $82,520.63 $1,306.77 Juurakko, Timo Fire Asst Chief, Community & Support Services $129,161.55 $3,446.99 Lamont, Kathy I. Personnel Officer
$98,356.39 $83.48 Leeburn, John Executive Director to CAO $163,731.31 $1,074.52 Liu, Wilson Geomatics Supervisor $80,647.20 $881.48 Macdonald, Robert Firefighter $94,200.37 $1,977.36
Marlo, Ceri Manager of Legislative Services & Emerg. Program $129,594.86 $2,424.68 McCormick, Wendy Director of Recreation $122,775.60 $1,408.13 McKee, Christopher J. Firefighter, Acting
Lieutenant $94,665.47 $0.00 McLeod, Bruce Manager, Parks Planning & Development $109,460.70 $4,008.67 Merenick, Diane Bylaw Services Supervisor $87,313.49 $1,702.65 Mikes, Daniela Manager
of Procurement $86,480.32 $11,117.26 Millward, Michael Facilities Operations Manager $110,100.63 $1,543.23 Minaker, Glen Parks Superintendent $92,212.40 $4,272.57 Mitchell, Ed Superintendent
Waterworks $112,383.19 $3,105.14 Moore, Kelly Fire Lieutenant $112,235.00 $563.31 Murray, Mike GM, Community Development & Recr.Services $138,212.09 $0.00 Narayan, Sureshwar Senior
Analyst Programmer $87,879.37 $3,356.61 Negoita, Victor Electro/Mechanical Manager $107,043.67 $4,040.67 Nolan, Catherine Manager of Accounting $111,119.63 $2,179.27 Oleschak, Walter
Foreman II $77,499.99 $0.00 Patel, Brian Recreation Coordinator $86,055.39 $486.22 Perkin, Kevin G. Fire Lieutenant $99,331.76 $27.15 Pickering, Jane Director of Planning $144,975.80
$3,321.03 Porter, Gary K. Fire Lieutenant $105,784.93 $245.00 Quinn, Frank GM, Public Works & Development Services $200,374.87 $1,141.27 Ramsay, Robert Fire Training Officer $112,239.14
$2,839.84 Riach, Ron Property & Risk Manager $103,711.07 $34.00 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (e) and Section 6 (2) (a-d), (3) (b) and
Section (6)
for 2011 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing the Remuneration and Expenses Paid to or on Behalf of Each Employee Richmond, Calvin
Foreman III $81,133.07 $1,591.87 Rule, James Chief Administrative Officer $246,488.83 $10,125.29 Rutledge, Silvia Manager of Revenue & Collections $107,705.65 $1,434.81 Schurer, Oliver
Business Systems Analyst $83,767.80 $0.00 Serediuk, Sean Network Support Specialist $85,805.98 $189.52 Serne, Bernie Superintendent Sewer works $110,757.39 $2,141.31 Seward, Adam R.
Firefighter, Acting Lieutenant $97,983.78 $0.00 Sinclair, James G. Fire Captain $109,729.48 $28.00 Smitton, Mark Fire Asst Chief, Fire Prevention & Communications $122,737.09 $2,605.27
Snow, Roy C. Firefighter, Acting Lieutenant $97,912.09 $476.18 Spence, Dane Fire Chief, Director Community Fire Safety Services $150,298.10 $10,155.90 Stewart, Michael Fire Captain
$120,239.38 $0.00 Stott, Rodney C. Environmental Planner $86,030.78 $2,642.39 Swift, Kelly GM, Community Development, Parks & Recreation $154,999.86 $4,513.62 Teboekhorst, Dennis Fire
Lieutenant $120,786.92 $0.00 Thompson, Trevor Manager of Financial Planning $117,202.55 $3,518.37 Todd, Thomas Foreman III $84,555.97 $131.57 Traviss, Stephen Senior Human Resources
Officer $107,218.33 $2,120.09 Van Dop, Michael J. Firefighter, Acting Asst Fire Chief, Planning & Prev. $85,480.66 $329.00 Van Tunen, Randolph Foreman III $77,065.64 $27.17 Vandenbor,
Paul J. Engineering Works Inspector $77,122.37 $0.00 Varcoe, Thomas Foreman II $86,523.49 $0.00 Veasey, Daryl Meter Maintenance Worker $76,984.16 $86.93 Vinje, Brock Firefighter $86,981.57
$0.00 Wetherill, Michelle Manager, Payroll & Employee Relations $104,223.61 $26.79 Wheeler, Susan Director of Community Services $122,320.39 $345.88 Wilson, Davin Engineering Technologist
I $75,090.46 $2,471.88 Wing, Graham Firefighter $82,159.88 $100.00 Wong, Richard Manager of Design & Projects $121,553.43 $2,943.81 Wood, Andrew Municipal Engineer $161,106.59 $4,810.19
Zosiak, Lisa A. Planner II $86,873.53 $9,255.78 Subtotal $12,162,786.56 $197,727.74 Consolidated Total of 17,862,545.07 104,800.27 Employees with remuneration less than $75,000 Total
All Employees 30,025,331.63 302,528.01 3 Reconciliation Total remuneration Elected Officials 356,798.49 Other Employees 30,025,331.63 Subtotal 30,382,130.12 Other reconciling Items
Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (e) and Section 6 (2) (a-d), (3) (b) and Section (6)
for 2011 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing the Remuneration and Expenses Paid to or on Behalf of Each Employee Employer portion
of: CPP 922,114.12 EI 436,181.42 Accruals 230,067.17 WCB 390,116.62 Pension 2,360,765.00 Other employer costs 1,212,788.55 (Medical, Dental, etc) Wages & Salaries per pg 17, Financial
Statements 35,934,163.00 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (e) and Section 6 (2) (a-d), (3) (b) and Section (6)
1 Alphabetical list of suppliers who received aggregate payments exceeding $25,000 Supplier Name Aggregate amount paid to supplier 775983 BC Ltd 80,511 A & A Testing Ltd 26,272 A & G
Supply Ltd 56,556 A & H Drilling Ltd 26,447 A T & H Industries Inc 225,001 Accent Glass & Locksmith 56,641 ACM Environmental Corporation 71,795 Active Network Ltd 36,023 Adopt A Block
Society 25,000 Advanced Drive Systems Inc 28,734 Aecom Canada Ltd 142,031 Alliance Painting & Decorating 26,012 Allstar Show Industries Inc 75,904 Allstream 37,962 Amec Earth & Environmental
Ltd 36,245 Andrew Sheret Ltd 68,387 Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd 96,882 Arbor Pro Tree Services Ltd 79,335 Atomic Crayon 30,707 AW Fire Guard & Supplies Ltd 33,361 Basic Business
Systems (1995) 42,701 BC Hydro 1,309,451 BC SPCA 955,261 BDO Canada LLP 82,933 BFI Canada Vancouver 120,330 Billesberger, Valerie 66,837 Black Press Group Ltd 42,206 Bob's A-Z Rentals
Ltd 32,693 Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd 454,172 Brandt Tractor Ltd 221,962 Bray, Ronald & Kristina & Ingram, Guy 364,000 Business In Vancouver Media Group 31,371 Bynett Construction
Services 207,772 Canada Pipe Company Ltd 33,110 Canadian Lawn Care Services 686,752 Canadian Pacific Railway 98,255 Carter Pontiac Buick Ltd 25,836 CDW Canada Inc 31,373 Centimark Corporation
64,533 Chevron Canada Ltd 825,762 City Of Coquitlam 46,994 City Of Pitt Meadows 289,999 Co Van International Trucks 320,888 Coast Water Systems Inc 41,584 Columbia Bitulithic Ltd 390,464
Commercial Aquatic Supplies 34,635 Commercial Solutions Inc 37,794 Co-Pilot Industries 121,921 Corix Water Products 48,601 Creative Transportation 27,806 Cross, Connie 50,540 Crown
Contracting Limited 54,348 CSDC Systems Inc 67,034 Cubex Limited 189,064 Dams Ford Lincoln Sales Ltd 51,420 David Butcher Law Corporation 40,988 Deccan International 29,414 The Corporation
of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing Payments Made for the Provision of Goods or Services for 2011 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation,
Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (f) and Section 7 (1) (a-c) and (2) (b) 1/5
The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing Payments Made for the Provision of Goods or Services for 2011 Delcan Corporation 47,693 Dell
Canada Inc 53,153 Directional Mining & Drilling 331,996 Dixon Networks Corporation 43,800 Double M Excavating Ltd 10,479,229 Douglas Lake Equipment 69,818 DSD Document Systems Direct
Ltd 61,063 Durante Kreuk Ltd 56,026 Eagle Bridge Inc 118,579 EBA Engineering Consultants 33,067 Emerald Green Building Service 32,610 Emergency Communications SW BC 965,684 Empire Signworks
Inc 50,168 ESRI Canada Limited 68,375 Farm Tek Turf Services Inc 49,656 FDM Software Ltd 59,091 Finning International Inc 32,544 Fitness Edge 209,633 Fitness Fixations 44,474 Fortis
BC Energy Inc 39,037 FortisBC -Natural Gas 177,885 Fraser Valley Regional Library 2,488,982 Fred Surridge Ltd 87,428 Gibson Waterworks Supply Inc 78,094 Golden Ears Ortho & Sports 31,433
Golder & Associates 113,252 Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage 32,895 Greater Vancouver Water District 6,158,632 Greater Vancouver Regional District 27,149 Green Landscape Experts
Ltd 31,451 Guest Excavating Company Ltd 30,912 Guild, Yule & Company LLP 25,327 Guillevin International Inc 185,111 Halcrow Consulting Inc 44,740 Hanks Trucking And Bulldozing 63,659
Happy Heart Fitness & Education 101,418 HB Lanarc 44,272 Heenan Blaikie LLP 52,003 ICBC -Fleet Insurance 161,306 Imperial Paving 2,385,408 Inprotect Systems Inc 73,221 Integrated Direct
Response Service 33,259 Interprovincial Traffic Services 126,665 ITT Water & Waste Water 56,662 Jack 4 Trade 46,566 Jacks Automotive & Welding 172,525 Justice Institute Of BC 42,982
Kainth, Gurmel 1,128,177 KBS Developments 31,094 Kerr Wood Leidal Associates 58,803 Lafarge Canada Inc 34,705 Langley Concrete Group 55,643 Landmark Enterprises 727,096 Leko Precast
Products 75,824 Letts Environmental Consultant 67,352 Levelton Consultants Ltd 48,828 Lordco Parts Ltd 25,175 M2K Construction Ltd 594,625 Manulife Financial 942,319 Maple Ridge & PM
Arts Council 747,307 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (f) and Section 7 (1) (a-c) and (2) (b) 2/5
The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing Payments Made for the Provision of Goods or Services for 2011 Maple Ridge Historical Society
134,515 McElhanney Consulting Services 73,861 Medical Services Plan 246,443 Metro Motors Ltd 225,019 Microserve 212,655 Microsoft Licensing 117,718 Miles Mobile Tire Service Ltd 43,770
Mills Printing & Stationery 75,730 Min Of Finance Dept Of Transp. 26,809 Mintha, Alfay & Sharon 380,439 Mission Contractors Ltd 200,880 MJT Enterprises Ltd 67,715 MMM Group Limited
51,104 Mobilecom Radio Company 26,795 Morrow Bioscience Ltd 31,744 Municipal Insurance Assoc 398,963 Municipal Pension Plan 2,365,417 Myra Systems Corp. 30,838 Newlands Lawn & Garden
Mainten 107,901 Norpac-Div Of Spartan Controls 28,856 North Of 49 Enterprises Ltd 40,799 North-Arm Machine Ltd 94,715 Northwest Hydraulic Consultant 40,948 Now Solutions 49,924 Oakcreek
Golf & Turf Inc 64,411 Ocean Pipe T6045 51,793 Open Storage Solutions 34,706 Oracle Corporation Canada Inc. 44,486 Pacific Ace Sports Surfaces 83,849 Pacific Flow Control Ltd 52,177
Panorama LMS 4011 116,320 Paragon Engineering Ltd 38,798 Pattison Sign Group 105,350 Paul Bunyan Tree Services 69,151 Pedre Contractors Ltd 419,331 People First Solutions 61,264 Phoenix
Environmental Services 56,802 Pitneyworks Prepaid 33,600 Pitt Meadows Heritage & Museum 75,134 Popular Landscaping & Gardening 25,066 Precise Crossings Ltd 697,165 Prestige Telecom
49,411 Pro Sound & Stage Lighting Ltd 39,109 Professional Mechanical Ltd 200,135 Profire Emergency Equipment 57,887 Progressive Contracting Ltd 509,514 PW Trenchless Construction Inc
262,675 Raincity Janitorial Serv Ltd 342,326 Raybern Erectors Ltd 75,183 RCMP 12,587,566 RCR Technologies Inc 26,249 Receiver General-Payroll Deduction 1,357,302 Reliable Flagging Services
Ltd 39,152 Remdal Painting & Restoration 66,373 RF Binnie & Associates Ltd 72,947 RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd 675,538 RGM Landscaping & Maint. Ltd 34,653 Ridge Meadows Seniors Society
189,895 Ridge Meadows Recycling Society 1,138,912 RJ Construction 120,036 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (f) and Section 7 (1) (a-c)
and (2) (b) 3/5
The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing Payments Made for the Provision of Goods or Services for 2011 Robson Crushing & Demolition 55,547
Rocky Mountain Phoenix 28,175 Rogers 129,261 Rollins Machinery Ltd 29,910 Ross Systems Inc 108,514 Sandpiper Contracting Ltd 310,956 School District#42 39,635 Scottish Line Painting
Ltd 132,164 Seal Tec Industries Ltd 30,862 Shades Of Green Landscaping 44,442 Smart-Tek Communications Inc 43,596 Smithrite Portable Services 37,505 Specimen Trees 29,684 Springford,
Nicola 53,323 Star Five Classic Country 55,335 Surfwood Supply Coquitlam 51,703 Surrey Fire Service 84,054 T & T Demolition Ltd 234,363 Tag Construction Ltd 189,124 Telus 161,053 Tempest
Development Group 121,710 Terasen Gas 66,358 Thistle Plumbing Limited 28,377 Tikal Construction Ltd. 109,673 Total Energy Systems Ltd 93,586 Tourism Maple Ridge & Pitt Meadows 42,749
Tundra Plumbing Ltd 113,487 Union of BC Municipalities 28,980 Universal Contracting Ltd. 241,775 Valley Landscaping Ltd 106,255 Valley Traffic Systems Inc 174,605 Van Houtte Coffee
Services Inc 47,083 Warrington PCI Management 851,254 Wedler Engineering 231,730 West Coast Elevator Services 87,857 Westridge Security Services 79,639 Westview Sales Ltd 71,157 Willis
Canada Inc 211,691 Winvan Paving Ltd 109,896 Wireless Technical Services 39,922 Wolf Electric Ltd 49,000 Workers Compensation Board 402,798 Young, Anderson -Barristers 207,764 Zoom
Audio Visual Networks Inc 26,593 Total aggregate amount paid to suppliers 69,397,466 $ 2 Consolidated total paid to suppliers who received aggregate payments of $25,000 or less 4,731,675
$ 3 Total of payments to suppliers for grants and contributions exceeding $25,000 Consolidated total of grants exceeding $25,000 223,141 Consolidated total of contributions exceeding
$25,000 0 Consolidated total of all grants and contributions exceeding $25,000 223,141 $ Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (f) and Section
7 (1) (a-c) and (2) (b) 4/5
The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing Payments Made for the Provision of Goods or Services for 2011 4 Reconciliation Total of aggregate
payments exceeding $25,000 paid to suppliers $ 69,397,466 Consolidated total of payments of $25,000 or less paid to suppliers $ 4,731,675 Consolidated total of all grants and contributions
exceeding $25,000 $ 223,141 Reconciling items Explanation below Total per Financial Statements, Expenditures & Expenses, Goods & Services including Capital $ 71,681,325 Variance $ (2,670,956)
Expenditures in the statements are on an accrual basis, whereas amounts paid are on a cash basis. It is important to note that not all payments are expenditures and that not all expenditures
are payments. It is not practical to reconcile to those sets of data. Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (f) and Section 7 (1) (a-c) and
(2) (b) 5/5
Consolidated Statement of Change in Net Financial Assets For the year ended December 31, 2011 Actual Budget Restated Actual 2011 2011 (Note 14) 2010 (Note 12) Annual Surplus $ 35,483,699
$ 57,729,252 $ 32,863,582 Add (Less): Change in Tangible Capital Assets Acquisition of tangible capital assets (48,002,409) (111,830,820) (45,820,180) Amortization 17,267,869 17,369,969
16,779,709 Proceeds from disposal of tangible capital assets 820,825 -478,083 Loss(gain) on disposal of tangible capital assets 632,238 -469,150 (29,281,477) (94,460,851) (28,093,238)
Change in Other Non Financial Assets Decrease (increase) in supplies inventory (6,389) -(16,872) Reclassification of undeveloped land bank --239,700 Acquisition of land bank properties
(316,123) -(3,684,034) Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses (43,647) -(26,592) (366,159) -(3,487,798) Increase (decrease) in Net Financial Assets 5,836,063 $ (36,731,599) 1,282,546
Net Financial Assets beginning of the year 16,503,061 16,503,061 15,220,515 Net Financial Assets end of the year $ 22,339,124 $ (20,228,538) $ 16,503,061 a). The notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement b). Contingencies, Commitments and Unrecognized Liabilities (Note 10) c). Pension Plan (Note 4)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow For the year ended December 31, 2011 Actual Restated Actual 2011 2010 (Note 12) Operating transactions Annual surplus $35,483,699 $32,863,582 Items
not utilizing cash Amortization 17,267,869 16,779,709 Loss on disposal of tangible capital assets 632,238 469,150 Contributed tangible capital assets (21,582,148) (20,765,925) Restricted
revenues drawn in (3,615,693) (6,653,251) (7,297,734) (10,170,317) Change in non-cash operating items Increase in prepaid expenses (43,647) (26,592) Decrease (increase) in supplies
inventory (6,391) (16,872) Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable (1,145,435) (3,247,436) Decrease (increase) in recoverable local improvements 703,568 85,249 Decrease (increase)
in other assets (20,136) (11,700) Decrease (increase) in inventory available for resale 471,471 -Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities 920,698 76,410 Increase
(decrease) in deferred revenue (3,289,003) (796,741) Increase (decrease) in refundable performance deposits 3,151,452 (549,472) Increase (decrease) in employee future benefits 273,400
(57,200) 1,015,977 (4,544,354) Cash provided by operating transactions 29,201,942 18,148,911 Capital transactions Proceeds on disposal of tangible capital assets 820,825 478,083 Cash
used to acquire tangible capital assets (26,420,261) (24,814,555) Cash used to acquire land bank properties (316,123) (3,684,034) Cash applied to capital transactions (25,915,559) (28,020,506)
Investing transactions Decrease (increase) in portfolio investments (11,954,127) 4,810,694 (11,954,127) 4,810,694 Financing transactions Debt repayment (1,878,010) (1,845,809) Collection
of restricted revenues 7,481,816 7,672,543 Cash applied to financing transactions 5,603,806 5,826,734 Increase in cash and temporary investments (3,063,938) 765,833 Cash and temporary
investments -beginning of year 30,062,599 29,296,766 Cash and temporary investments -end of year $26,998,661 $30,062,599 Supplementary information: Non-cash transactions: Transfer from
undeveloped landbank properties to tangible capital assets -239,700 Transfer from inventory available for resale to tangible capital assets 471,471 -a). The notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement b). Contingencies, Commitments and Unrecognized Liabilities (Note 10) c). Pension Plan (Note 4)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements For the year ended December 31, 2011 1. Cash and Investments Cash and Temporary Investments: Cash and temporary investments as at December
31, 2011 were comprised as follows: Dec 31, 2011 Dec 31, 2010 Cash $ 4,929,549 $ 3,062,549 Temporary Investments 22,069,112 27,000,050 $ 26,998,661 $ 30,062,599 Temporary investments
are comprised of BC Credit Union term deposits with effective interest rates of 1.6% -2.00%. Additionally, the District holds temporary investments of $1,652,394 ($1,443,453 for 2010)
and agreements receivable of $258,450 ($159,918 for 2010) for trusts which are not reported elsewhere in the financial statements. They are held for the following trusts: Balance Dec
31, 2010 Interest Earned Receipts Disbursements Balance Dec 31, 2011 Latecomer Fees $ 59,059 $ -$ 93,390 $ 87,226 $ 65,223 Cemetery Perpetual Care 774,062 99,878 50,978 99,878 825,040
Greater Vancouver Sewer & Drainage District 340,831 -750,018 621,754 469,095 Albion Dyking District 429,419 106 133,187 11,226 551,486 $ 1,603,371 $ 99,984 $ 1,027,573 $ 820,084 $ 1,910,844
Portfolio Investments Portfolio investments include Canadian bank notes and BC Credit Union term deposits with effective interest rates of 1.90% -6.43%. A portion of the bank notes
held have interest payments linked to the performance of a set of equities or a financial index without stated or certain interest rates. For these investments, income is recognized
as it is received; in 2011 returns were positive and ranged to 5.44%. Included in interest earnings are gains on the sale of investments before maturity. In 2011 gains totalled $1,148,044
($864,050 for 2010). The District does not hold any asset backed commercial paper or hedge funds. The carrying value of securities is based on the cost method whereby the cost of the
security is adjusted to reflect investment income that is accruing and any permanent decline in market value. During the term of individual investments there will be fluctuations in
market values. Such fluctuations are considered normal, and if held to maturity, market value will be equal to face value. The carrying value of Portfolio Investments at December 31,
2011 was $90,812,593 ($78,858,466 for 2010). The market value at December 31, 2011 was $90,362,851 ($80,409,332 for 2010), included in this amount is $nil ($500,000 for 2010) for securities
shown at cost for investments for which there is no active market. 2. Accounts Receivable 2011 2010 Property Taxes $ 6,258,187 $ 5,749,866 Other Governments 4,770,393 4,211,654 General
and Accrued Interest 2,531,650 2,063,871 Development Cost Charges 4,163,340 4,532,167 17,723,570 16,557,558 Less: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (176,100) (155,523) $ 17,547,470 $
16,402,035
3. Recoverable Local Improvements The District provides interim financing for certain geographically localized capital projects. It recovers these amounts either from benefiting property
owners or from provincial subsidies. Interest rates are established at the outset of the process and are a function of borrowing rates at the time. Repayment is typically made over
fifteen years. As at December 31, 2011 the recoverable balance was comprised as follows: 2011 2010 Recoverable from property owners Local improvement fund projects $ 1,637,104 $ 2,216,485
Recoverable from Province Sewerage projects -124,187 $ 1,637,104 $ 2,340,672 4. Pension Plan The District and its employees contribute to the Municipal Pension Plan (Plan), a jointly
trusteed pension plan. The board of trustees, representing plan members and employers, is responsible for overseeing the management of the Plan, including investment of the assets and
administration of benefits. The Plan is a multi-employer contributory pension plan. Basic pension benefits provided are defined. The plan has about 173,000 active members and approximately
63,000 retired members. Active members include approximately 35,000 contributors from local governments. The latest valuation as at December 31, 2009 indicated an unfunded liability
of $1,024 million for basic pension benefits. The next valuation will be as at December 31, 2012 with results available in 2013. Defined contribution plan accounting is applied to the
Plan as the Plan exposes the participating entities to actuarial risks associated with the current and former employees of other entities, with the result that there is no consistent
and reliable basis for allocating the obligation, Plan assets and cost to individual entities participating in the Plan. The District paid $2,360,765 (2010 -$2,099,231) for employer
contributions to the Plan in fiscal 2011, while employees contributed $1,946,622 (2010 -$1,727,051) to the plan in fiscal 2011. 5. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities 2011 2010
Accounts Payable: General $ 5,093,886 $ 4,861,622 Other Governments 6,741,112 6,050,779 Salaries and Wages 663,536 620,986 12,498,534 11,533,387 Accrued Liabilities: Vacation Pay 264,805
334,949 Other Vested Benefits 379,133 353,438 643,938 688,387 $ 13,142,472 $ 12,221,774
6. Long Term Debt (Schedule 4) The District obtains debt instruments through the Municipal Finance Authority (MFA), pursuant to security issuing bylaws under authority of the Community
Charter, to finance certain capital expenditures. Debt is reported net of Sinking Fund balances and interest expense is reported net of Sinking Fund earnings. The District carries no
debt for others. Debt issued and outstanding as at December 31, 2011 was $38,505,484 ($40,383,494 for 2010). In 2012 the District will enter into additional debt totalling $5.52M under
loan authorization bylaw numbers 6659, 6560, 6562 and 6679. The amounts payable over the next five years reflect the District's commitment for both existing debt and amounts that will
be borrowed in 2012. The following debenture debt amounts plus related interest are payable over the next five years: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $ 1,814,777 $ 2,428,959 $ 2,488,890 $
2,550,786 $ 2,614,712 The District has the following authorized but un-issued long term debt as at December 31, 2011: L/A Bylaw L/A Amount Expiry Date #6558 $ 6,000,000 July 2013 #6559
1,520,000 July 2013 #6560 900,000 July 2013 #6561 10,671,185 July 2013 #6562 2,675,000 July 2013 #6679 1,800,000 September 2014 #6680 4,680,000 September 2014 $ 28,246,185 7. Other
Assets Debt Reserve Fund: The Municipal Finance Authority of British Columbia provides capital financing for regional districts and their member municipalities. The Authority is required
to establish a Debt Reserve Fund. Each regional district, through its member municipalities who share in the proceeds of a debt issue, is required to pay into the Debt Reserve Fund
certain amounts set out in the debt agreements. The Authority pays into the Debt Reserve Fund these monies from which interest earned thereon less administrative expenses becomes an
obligation to the regional districts. It must then use this fund, if at any time there are insufficient funds, to meet payments on its obligations. If this occurs, the regional districts
may be called upon to restore the fund. Upon the maturity of a debt issue the unused portion of the Debt Reserve Fund established for that issue will be discharged to the District.
The District has estimated that there is only a remote possibility that these funds will not be paid to it and therefore these funds have been included in Other Assets of $610,856 ($590,720
for 2010). 8. Employee Future Benefits The District provides employee future benefits in the form of severance benefits and vested and non-vested sick leave to qualifying employees.
These benefits are not separately funded. Severance benefits are cash settlements paid to employees who cease their employment with the District after a specified period of time. Full
time employees hired before February 11, 1999 qualify for five days pay per year of employment, provided they either work a minimum of 20 years with the District or retire as defined
by the Public Sector Pension Plan Act. Full time employees hired after February 11, 1999 qualify for 20 days pay provided they work a minimum of 10 years with the District and retire
as defined by the Public Sector Pension Plan Act. The District permits full time employees to accumulate up to 18 days per year of service for future illnesses up to a maximum of 250
days. For certain qualifying employees a portion of this benefit vests; for the balance, this benefit does not vest and cannot be converted to any other type of benefit.
An actuarial valuation of these benefits was performed to determine the District's liability and accrued benefit obligation as at December 31, 2009 and updated for December 31, 2011.
The valuation resulted in an unamortized actuarial loss of $700,900 ($486,900 loss for 2010 ) at December 31, 2011. Actuarial gains or losses are amortized over the expected average
remaining service life of employees. The benefit liability at December 31, 2011 was $4,684,900, ($4,411,500 for 2010) comprised as follows: 2011 2010 Benefit Liability -Beginning of
the year $ 4,411,500 $ 4,468,700 Add: Current service costs 341,900 313,800 Interest on accrued benefit obligation 213,400 224,900 Less: Amortization of actuarial loss (gain) 44,500
13,200 Benefits paid during the year (326,400) (609,100) Benefit Liability -End of the year 4,684,900 4,411,500 Less: Unamortized actuarial loss (gain) 700,900 486,900 Accrued benefit
obligation -End of the year 5,385,800 4,898,400 Actuarial assumptions used to determine the District's accrued benefit obligation are as follows: 2011 2010 Discount rate (long-term
borrowing rate) 3.40 % 4.25 % Expected future inflation rate 2.50 % 2.50 % Merit and inflationary wage and salary increases averaging 4.55 % 4.55 % Estimated average remaining service
life of employees (years) 10.3 10.3 9. Property Tax Levies In addition to its own tax levies, the District is required to levy taxes on behalf of various other taxing authorities. These
include the provincial government for local school taxes, incorporated dyking districts located within the District and, organizations providing regional services in which the District
has become a member. Total tax levies for 2011 of $98,359,060 , ($93,932,367 for 2010) were comprised as follows. 2011 2010 Municipal Tax Levies $ 61,065,872 $ 57,102,978 Levies for
other authorities School taxes 29,434,404 28,992,968 Greater Vancouver Transit Authority 5,623,557 5,664,892 British Columbia Assessment Authority 897,324 894,907 Greater Vancouver
Regional District Parks 904,315 883,862 Dyking Districts 430,826 390,170 Municipal Finance Authority 2,762 2,590 Total Collections for Others 37,293,188 36,829,389 Total Tax Levies
$ 98,359,060 $ 93,932,367
10. Contingencies, Commitments and Unrecognized Liabilities: (a) Third Party Claims Where losses related to litigation are possible and can be reasonably estimated management accrues
its best estimate of loss. For 2011 this estimate is $458,860 ($483,949 for 2010). These amounts are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. There are various other claims
by and against the District, the outcome of which cannot be reasonably be estimated. Any ultimate settlements will be recorded in the year the settlements occur. (b) Contractual Obligations
(i) Water (a) The District has entered into a cost share agreement with the Greater Vancouver Water District for the construction of infrastructure. Under this agreement the District
expects to incur costs of approximately $6,985,712 over the next 3 years. The liability is recorded as the related costs are incurred. (ii) Recreation and Cultural Services (a) In 1998
the District entered into an agreement to purchase ice sheet time for five years commencing in 1999, with a five-year renewal option. In August 2008, the District renewed the agreement
for an additional five-year period. The minimum annual payment due for the provision of ice time is $609,225. These payments are recorded as expenses when the ice time is provided.
(c) Unrecognized Liability The District holds shares in a non-profit organization that provides protective services to its members. Should the organization dissolve or management choose
to withdraw from the organization the District would be liable for a proportionate share of any debt the organization held at that time. The liability is expected to be discharged over
time through payments by the District and others for the provision of these services by the organization. Due to the ongoing operations of the organization the liability could only
be quantified if the District chose to withdraw. Consequently no liability has been recognized in these financial statements. 11. Restricted Revenues Restricted revenues held by the
District as at December 31, 2011 of $41,042,622 , ($37,176,499 for 2010) were comprised as follows: Development Cost Charges Parkland Acquisition Charges Actual Actual Actual Actual
2011 2010 2011 2010 Beginning Balance $ 32,211,726 $ 31,644,928 $ 162,355 $ -Collections and interest 7,020,123 7,174,886 166,482 173,961 Disbursements -operating (610,934) (1,282,185)
--Disbursements -capital (2,959,941) (5,325,903) (33,755) (11,606) Ending Balance $ 35,660,974 $ 32,211,726 $ 295,082 $ 162,355 Other Restricted Revenues Total Restricted Revenues Actual
Actual Actual Actual 2011 2010 2011 2010 Beginning Balance $ 4,802,418 $ 4,512,279 $ 37,176,499 $ 36,157,207 Collections and interest 295,212 323,696 7,481,817 7,672,543 Disbursements
-operating (11,064) (33,557) (621,998) (1,315,742) Disbursements -capital --(2,993,696) (5,337,509) Ending Balance $ 5,086,566 $ 4,802,418 $ 41,042,622 $ 37,176,499
12. Prior Period Adjustments In 2009, the District adopted the provisions of Section 3150 of the PSAB Handbook and recorded the District's tangible capital assets, net of related amortization,
as non-financial assets. During 2011, additional information became available about the District's inventory of tangible capital assets and the financial statements have been retroactively
adjusted. The change represents less than 0.5% of tangible capital assets. The impact of these changes was to: -Increase opening accumulated surplus by $333,832 -Increase closing accumulated
surplus by $3,729,991 as follows: 2010 2010 (restated) (previously reported) Net Financial Position $ 16,503,061 $ 16,503,061 Tangible capital assets (book value) 779,162,639 775,432,647
Undeveloped land bank 14,515,918 14,515,918 Other non-financial assets 797,635 797,635 Accumulated Surplus $ 810,979,253 $ 807,249,261 -Increase annual surplus by $3,396,159 as follows:
2010 2010 (restated) (previously reported) Revenues $ 129,555,181 $ 126,130,641 Expenses (expenditures) other than capital and amortization 79,911,890 79,911,890 Amortization expense
16,779,709 16,751,328 Annual Surplus 32,863,582 29,467,423 13. Tangible Capital Assets Net book value 2011 2010 (restated) Land $ 163,746,422 $ 152,958,988 Buildings 54,492,347 56,027,780
Transportation network 188,149,163 187,574,645 Storm system 159,840,958 155,343,455 Fleet and equipment 12,531,688 12,975,149 Technology 3,822,127 3,682,668 Water system 95,625,842
93,146,901 Sanitary system 117,602,837 106,215,140 Other 12,632,730 11,237,913 $ 808,444,114 $ 779,162,639 For additional information, see the Schedule of Tangible Capital Assets (Schedule
5) During the year there were no write-downs of assets (2010 -$Nil) and no interest was capitalized (2010 -$Nil). In addition, roads and related infrastructure, underground networks
and technology assets contributed to the District totaled $21,582,148 ($20,765,925 for 2010) and were capitalized at their fair value at the time of receipt. Property with a book value
of $471,471, listed as available for sale at the end of 2010, was reclassified to tangible capital assets during the year. Works of art, artifacts, cultural and historic assets are
not recorded as assets in the financial statements. The District controls various works of art and historical treasures including artifacts, paintings, sculptures and mosaics located
at District sites and public display areas.
14. Budget Budget amounts represent the Financial Plan Bylaw adopted by Council on May 10, 2011. The Financial Plan anticipated use of suprluses accumulated in previous years to balance
against current year expenditures in excess of current year revenues. The following shows how these amounts were combined: Financial Plan Bylaw Financial Statement Budget Revenue Taxation
$ 60,849,203 $ 60,849,203 User fees and other revenue 33,191,738 33,191,738 Other 60,279,983 60,279,983 Contributed subdivision infrastructure 12,250,000 12,250,000 Total Revenue 166,570,924
166,570,924 Expenses Protective services 29,661,630 29,661,630 Transportation services 16,581,090 16,581,090 Recreation and cultural 20,987,495 20,987,495 Water utility 12,677,615 12,677,615
Sewer utility 9,623,830 9,623,830 General Government 15,381,485 15,381,485 Planning, public health and other 3,928,527 3,928,527 Total expenses 108,841,672 108,841,672 Annual Surplus
$ 57,729,252 $ 57,729,252 Less: Capital expenditures 111,830,820 Debt repayment 4,741,276 Add: Interfund transfers 18,734,460 Amortization 17,369,969 Borrowing proceeds 22,738,415 $
-15. Accumulated Surplus Accumulated Surplus is comprised of operating surpluses and equity in tangible capital assets held in the general, sewer and water funds as well as reserves.
Accumulated surplus for 2011 is $846,462,952 ($810,979,253 for 2010) and is distributed as follows: 2011 Restated 2010 Operating surplus (Schedule 1) General $ 5,750,719 $ 5,156,074
Sewer 2,508,311 2,515,823 Water 3,176,352 3,638,446 11,435,382 11,310,343 Equity in tangible capital assets (Schedule 2) General 566,526,923 552,530,544 Sewer 119,059,516 107,667,501
Water 96,533,666 93,962,893 782,120,105 754,160,938 Reserves (Schedule 3) Funds 25,144,547 21,275,267 Accounts 27,762,918 24,232,705 52,907,465 45,507,972 Accumulated Surplus $ 846,462,952
$ 810,979,253
16. Expenditures and Expenses by Object Operations Capital Acquisitions 2011 Total 2011 Budget Restated 2010 Total Goods and services 45,780,996 25,900,329 71,681,325 154,177,700 72,332,910
Wages and salaries 35,098,108 836,055 35,934,163 35,597,288 33,608,597 Interest 2,391,798 -2,391,798 3,136,550 2,468,972 Total Expenditures 83,270,902 26,736,384 110,007,286 192,911,538
108,410,479 Amortization expenses 17,267,869 -17,267,869 17,369,969 16,779,709 Contributed tangible capital assets -21,582,148 21,582,148 12,250,000 20,765,925 Total Expenditures and
Expenses 100,538,771 48,318,532 148,857,303 222,531,507 145,956,113 17. Undeveloped Land Bank The District owns property in various areas identified for future growth in the Official
Community Plan. These properties are not currently used in the provision of service to the citizens of Maple Ridge. The properties represent a strategic, non-renewable resource available
for the advancement of Councils' strategic plan. In 2011, the District acquired land bank properties valued at $316,123. 18. Segmented Information This District is a diversified municipal
government entity in the province of British Columbia that provides a wide range of services to its citizens. Municipal services have been segmented by grouping activities that have
similar service objections (by function) and separately disclosed in the segment report. Where certain activities cannot be attributed to a specific segment they have been reported
as unallocated. The segments and the services they provide are as follows: Protective Services Protective Services is comprised of the Ridge Meadows RCMP detachment, the Maple Ridge
Fire Department, bylaw enforcement, inspection services and emergency services. Services provided by the segment are focused on protecting the citizens of Maple Ridge. Transportation
Services Transportation Services is comprised of Engineering, Operations, Drainage and Roads. Services provided by the segment include the construction and maintenance of transportation
related infrastructure. Recreation and Cultural Recreation and cultural services provides library services, access to recreation facilities and maintains and operates District parks.
Water Utility The Water Utility, in conjunction with Metro Vancouver, provides safe, clean, reliable water to the residents and businesses of the District of Maple Ridge. Sewer Utility
The Sewer Utility collects waste water and transports it to treatment plants operated by Metro Vancouver in addition to maintaining the sanitary sewer infrastructure. General Government
General Government provides administrative, legislative and support services for the District. Functions include financial planning and reporting, information technology, economic development
and communications. Planning, Public Health and Other This segment is comprised of Planning, Recycling, Cemetery and Social Planning. Activities include land use guidelines, development
of the District's official community plan, management of the recycling contract and improving the social well-being of the community. Unallocated Unallocated includes revenues and expenses
that cannot be directly attributed to the activities of an identified functional segment.
Schedule 2 Schedule of Change in Equity in Capital Assets For the year ended December 31, 2011 Actual Budget Restated Actual 2011 2011 2010 Revenue Subdivision infrastructure contributions
$ 21,582,148 $ 12,250,000 $ 20,765,925 Senior government transfers 10,086,063 25,052,578 6,694,315 Development fees 2,993,696 25,944,459 5,337,509 Other capital contributions 95,213
1,762,302 588,324 Disposal of tangible capital assets (1,453,063) -(947,234) Total Revenue 33,304,057 65,009,339 32,438,839 Expenses Amortization 17,267,869 17,369,969 16,779,709 Total
Expenses 17,267,869 17,369,969 16,779,709 Annual Surplus 16,036,188 47,639,370 15,659,130 Internal Transfers Transfers and principal payments from revenue funds 5,730,382 10,634,597
5,980,101 Transfers from reserves 6,192,597 18,189,744 11,851,675 Increase (decrease) in equity in capital assets 27,959,167 76,463,711 33,490,906 Equity in capital assets -beginning
of the year 754,160,938 754,160,938 720,670,032 Equity in capital assets -end of the year (Note 15) $ 782,120,105 $ 830,624,649 $ 754,160,938
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: CDPR-0640-30 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Committee
of the Whole SUBJECT: Cedar Park Construction – Award of Tender EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Tenders for the construction of Cedar Park, located at 23735-132 Avenue, were received on June 8,
2012. Two bids which were in compliance with the tender documents were received. Based on the tenders received the cost of this project, in combination with the expenses to date for
design, survey and building demolition will exceed the previously approved budget of $310,644. Recent experience with similar park construction projects would suggest this level of
funding is no longer adequate for the development of a neighbourhood park, particularly with the challenging topography in Silver Valley. This budget figure has been revised for more
recent park development projects in the long term capital plan. Staff has considered reducing the scope of work, however removing any of the play elements will only result in an incomplete
project that will need to be remedied at a later date. This project is primarily funded through Development Cost Charges (DCC’s). As a result of under spending of DCC funds budgeted
to acquire a Silver Valley Neighbourhood Park in 2012, staff are recommending that the construction budget for this Silver Valley Park be increased utilizing these under-spent DCC funds.
Award of this tender is recommended RECOMMENDATION: That the tender contract PL12-46 for the construction of Cedar Park be awarded to Wilco Civil Inc. for $310,560 plus HST and that
the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the agreement and further, that the financial plan be amended to reflect this change. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: On March 27,
2012 Council authorized staff to proceed with the preparation of tender documents for the construction of Cedar Park based on the concept plan dated February 16, 2012. Following this
authorization staff have proceeded with demolition of the existing residence, and issued a tender on May 22, 2012. b) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Two bids for Tender PL12-46
Cedar Park were received. The prices tendered were for the base site works and a separate price list for park amenities. The selection of bids tendered is determined by the base site
work price submitted not including HST. Base site work Bid Pricing: Wilco Civil Inc. $250,926.00 Canadian Lawn Care Services Ltd. $279,982.96 1151
The approved budget for the total construction of this park is $310,644. Staff are recommending the budget can be increased with DCC funds to include the base bid, park amenity items
listed separately in this tender, the demolition cost, site survey and consultant services for a total project cost $376,610. The DCC funds can be used for both new park acquisition
and development of new park sites. As a result of under spending funds to acquire a recent park site in Silver Valley, there is capacity within the overall Park DCC budget to accommodate
the additional cost for this park construction. Cost Breakdown Consultant/Surveyor $ 26,000 (expended) Demolition/Hazard Abatement 13,450 (expended) Haz/Mat Consultant 1,800 (expended)
Base Site Work Tender Price 250,926 Park Amenities Cost 59,634 Construction Contract $310,560 Construction Contingency (8%) 24,800 (only to be used if needed) Total Project Cost $376,610
Approved Budget $310,644 Required addition $ 65,966 CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Corporate Officer be authorized to enter into an agreement with Wilco Civil Inc. for the construction
of Tender PL12-46 at Cedar Park. “Original signed by Bruce McLeod” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Bruce McLeod, MBCSLA Manager of Parks Planning & Development
“Original signed by David Boag” _______________________________________________ Approved by: David Boag, Director of Parks & Facilities “Original signed by Trevor Thompson” _________________________
______________________ Reviewed by: Trevor Thompson, Manager of Financial Planning “Original signed by Kelly Swift” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Kelly
Swift, General Manager Community Development, Parks and Recreation Services “Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule _______________________________________________ Concurrence: J.L. (Jim)
Rule Chief Administrative Officer :BMcL
District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: CDPR-0640-30 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Committee
of the Whole SUBJECT: Deer Fern Park Construction – Award of Tender EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Tenders for the construction of Deer Fern Park, located on 236th Street just south of 134th Avenue
were received on June 8, 2012. Two bids which were in compliance with the tender documents were received. Based on the tenders received the cost of this project in combination with
the expenses to date for design and survey will exceed the previously approved budget of $310,488. Recent experience with similar park construction projects would suggest this level
of funding is no longer adequate for the development of a neighbourhood park, particularly with the challenging topography in Silver Valley. This budget figure has been revised for
more recent park development projects in the long term capital plan. Staff have considered reducing the scope of work, however removing any of the play elements will only result in
an incomplete project that will need to be remedied at a later date. This project is primarily funded through Development Cost Charges (DCC’s). As a result of under spending of DCC
funds budgeted to acquire a Silver Valley neighbourhood Park in 2012, Staff are recommending that the construction budget for this Silver Valley park be increased utilizing these under
spent DCC funds. Award of this tender is recommended RECOMMENDATION: That the tender contract PL12-45 for the construction of Deer Fern Park be awarded to Wilco Civil Inc. for $313,431
plus HST and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the agreement and further, that the financial plan be amended to reflect this change. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context:
On March 27, 2012 Council authorized staff to proceed with the preparation of tender documents for the construction of Deer Fern Park based on the concept plan dated February 9, 2012.
Following this authorization staff have proceeded with detailed design, and issued a tender on May 22, 2012. b) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Two bids for Tender PL12-45 Deer
Fern Park were received. The prices tendered were for the base site works and a separate price list for park amenities. The selection of bids tendered is determined by the base site
work price submitted not including HST. Base site work Bid Pricing: Wilco Civil Inc. $266,437.00 Canadian Lawn Care Services Ltd. $268,731.26 1152
The approved budget for the total construction of this park is $310,488. Staff are recommending the budget be increased with DCC funds to include the base bid, park amenity items listed
separately in this tender, site survey and consultant services for a total project cost $359,231. The DCC funds can be used for both new park acquisition and development of new park
sites. As a result of under spending funds to acquire a recent park site in Silver Valley, there is capacity within the overall Park DCC budget to accommodate the additional cost for
this park construction. Cost Breakdown Consultant/Surveyor $ 21,000 (expended) Base Site Work Tender Price $266,437 Park Amenities Cost 46,994 Construction Contract $313,431 Construction
Contingency (8%) $ 24,800 (only to be used if needed) Total Project Cost $359,231 Approved Budget $310,488 Required addition $ 48,743 CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to enter into an agreement with Wilco Civil Inc. for the construction of Tender PL12-45 at Deer Fern Park. “Original signed by Bruce McLeod” ___________________________________
____________ Prepared by: Bruce McLeod, MBCSLA Manager of Parks Planning & Development “Original signed by David Boag” _______________________________________________ Approved by: David
Boag, Director of Parks & Facilities “Original signed by Trevor Thompson” _______________________________________________ Reviewed by: Trevor Thompson, Manager of Financial Planning
“Original signed by Kelly Swift” _______________________________________________ Approved by: Kelly Swift, General Manager Community Development, Parks and Recreation Services; “Original
signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule _______________________________________________ Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer :BMcL
Page 1 of 16 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 18, 2012 and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C.O.W. SUBJECT:
Town Centre Incentive Program Partnering Agreements EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On November 1, 2010, Municipal Council approved the framework for an incentive program to encourage accelerated
private sector investment. On February 8, 2011, Council approved the use of partnering agreements as one of the tools to support the program, for those projects that advance Town Centre
Area Plan goals and objectives. Several projects totaling $37 million in construction value are nearing the stage where partnering agreements are required in order for the District
to provide the incentive. In accordance with Council direction, the agreements are presented for consideration at a public meeting, and are subject to Council approval. RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute Partnering Agreements for Building Permit Numbers 11-120295, 12-109255, 11-124858, 11-110037 and 12-112565 to provide financial incentives
of $201,212 as part of the Town Centre Investment Incentive Program. DISCUSSION The vision for the Town Centre is dependent upon numerous goals and objectives that cannot be met solely
through the actions of the District, and therefore private partners are a critical element in achieving the vision. The projects referred to in this report help to achieve objectives
within the Town Centre Area Plan. Building permit number 11-120292 is for the $7.8 million construction of a four-storey apartment building in Town Centre Sub Area 1, at 12075 Edge
Street; Building permit number 12-109255 is for the $6.8 million construction of a community gaming centre at 22710 Lougheed Highway; Building permit number 11-124858 is for the
$6.3 million construction of a four-storey mixed-use building in Town Centre Sub Area 1, at 11882 226 Street (building 1 of a two building project); Building permit number 11-110037
is for the $8.9 million construction of a four-storey apartment building in Town Centre Sub Area 1, at 12040 222 Street; Building permit number 12-112565 is for the $7.5 million construction
of a four-storey apartment building in Town Centre Sub Area 1, at 11873 Burnett Street. 1181
Page 2 of 16 The residential projects are eligible for assistance of up to 10% of the Development Cost Charges, to a project cap of $50,000. They do not qualify for the $75,000 cap for
LEED-Silver certified (minimum) or where greater than 50% of energy consumption will be sourced from alternative/renewable energy. The commercial project is eligible for assistance
of up to 25% of the Development Cost Charges, to a project cap of $25,000. It does not qualify for the $37,500 cap for LEED-Silver certified (minimum) or where greater than 50% of energy
consumption will be sourced from alternative/renewable energy. In alignment with the District’s desire for transparency, newspaper notices are scheduled for June 13 and June 20. DESIRED
OUTCOME To provide financial incentives to encourage developments that support Council’s vision for a strong and vibrant Town Centre. BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL PLAN IMPLICATIONS As part
of a review of 2010 financial performance, General Revenue funding of $500,000 was reserved to support the upfront incentive element of the Town Centre Investment Incentive Program.
In March 2012, after a status report indicated the funding was oversubscribed if projects in progress met the program deadline, Council authorized a further $240,000 toward the program.
The partnering agreements referred to in this report will required that the reserve will be drawn down by $201,212. In combination with two previous partnering agreements, the balance
remaining in the reserve will be $466,618. Beginning Balance $500,000 January 2012 funding 240,000 11566 224 Street -31,094 Paid 22308 Lougheed Highway -41,076 Payment pending 12075
Edge Street -47,076 22710 Lougheed Highway -4,136 11882 226 Street -50,000 Maximum 12040 222 Street -50,000 Maximum 11837 Burnett Street -50,000 Maximum Balance Remaining $466,618
Page 3 of 16 CITIZEN IMPLICATIONS The District’s approach to the incentive program is one of full transparency. After numerous Council reports, presentations and newspaper notices, one
citizen comment has been logged with respect to the incentive program. The comment related to using property tax revenue, which is primarily residential, supporting business. This comment
should be considered in concert with the recent citizen surveys which communicated strong support for the Town Centre, and a desire for expansion of the commercial base. The incentive
program was built upon expanded commercial development, both directly through incentives, and indirectly by encouraging the residential density needed to support businesses. CONCLUSION
This report requests Council authorization to execute partnering agreements that will allow the District to provide financial incentives for five development projects noted in this
report. The incentives total $201,212 and support the $37 million in construction value represented by these projects. The partnering agreement incentives are a component of a comprehensive
incentive program that supports Council’s vision for the Town Centre. “Original signed by Laura Benson” _______________________________________________ Prepared by: Laura Benson, CMA
Manager, Sustainability and Corporate Planning “Original signed by John Bastaja” for _______________________________________________ Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, CGA General Manager:
Corporate and Financial Services “Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule _______________________________________________ Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Attachments:
Project Information Partnering Agreement Template
Page 4 of 16 PROJECT INFORMATION – BUILDING PERMIT NO. 11-120292 Figure 1: Subject Map, 12075 Edge Street Figure 2: Rendering (may not reflect final plan) Subject property
Page 5 of 16 PROJECT INFORMATION – BUILDING PERMIT NO. 12-109255 Figure 2: Subject Map, 22710 Lougheed Highway Figure 2: Rendering (may not reflect final plan) Subject property
Page 6 of 16 PROJECT INFORMATION – BUILDING PERMIT NO. 11-124858 Figure 3: Subject Map, 11882 226 Street Figure 2: Rendering (may not reflect final plan) Subject property
Page 7 of 16 PROJECT INFORMATION – BUILDING PERMIT NO. 12-110037 Figure 4: Subject Map, 12040 222 Street Figure 2: Rendering (may not reflect final plan) Subject property
Page 8 of 16 PROJECT INFORMATION – BUILDING PERMIT NO. 12-112565 Figure 5: Subject Map, 11873 Burnett (and 11865, 11785) Figure 2: Rendering (may not reflect final plan) Subject property
Page 9 of 16 PARTNERING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT dated for reference mmm dd, yyyy, BETWEEN: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a municipal corporation under the laws of British Columbia and having
its offices at 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia V2X 6A9 (“District”) AND: (“Owner“) WHEREAS: A. The Community Charter, Part 3, Division 1, Section 21 authorizes the
District to enter into an agreement for the provision of a service on behalf of the municipality; B. The achievement of the District’s vision, goals and objectives for the Town Centre
require private sector development; C. The Owner agrees to construct a Project that supports Town Centre goals and objectives, as identified on Schedule A: Town Centre Goals and Objectives;
D. The District agrees to provide a financial incentive, as identified in section 4(a): NOW THEREFORE in consideration of $1.00 paid by the District to the Owner, the receipt and sufficiency
of which the Owner acknowledges, the parties agree as follows: 1. In this Incentive Agreement, a. ”Sub Area 1” means that area identified in Schedule B of this agreement b. “Sub Area
2” means that area identified in Schedule B of this agreement c. “Project” means: Description of development project, address, number of units, building permit no. 2. The Owner agrees
to: a. Undertake the following service on behalf of the District: Either wholly or in part, achieve goals and objectives outlined on Schedule A: Town Centre Goals and Objectives, through
construction and completion of a Project as described in section 1; b. Comply with all other Municipal bylaws, regulations, agreements and permits in relation to the Project; c. Obtain
final occupancy permit(s) for the Project within two (2) years from the date the Building Permit was issued. d. All work identified under the building permit is to be completed no later
than 120 days after the issuance of the first Provisional Occupancy Permit and an unconditional Occupancy Permit is issued
Page 10 of 16 3. If the Owner or the Project causes any breach of any obligation set forth in this Incentive Agreement, the Owner must forfeit the amount received under paragraph 4,
or a lesser amount agreed to by both parties. The forfeited amount must be received by the District within thirty (30) days of the date the District issued notification of the breach.
4. The District agrees to pay to the Owner $XX,XXX, representing an amount equivalent to a portion of Municipal Development Cost Charges assessed on the Project, as described in the
Town Centre Investment Incentives Program. Payment will be made on the eleventh (11th) business day following the date on which the Development Cost Charges were received by the District.
Payment will be held back if the Project is not in compliance with all other Municipal bylaws, regulations, agreements and permits. 5. This Incentive Agreement expires on the date all
units in the Project have been issued final occupancy permits. As evidence of their agreement to be bound by the terms of this Incentive Agreement, the parties have executed this Incentive
Agreement as follows: Date: ______________________, 2011 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE ) by its authorized signatory: ) ) ) ) ) ________________________________________ ) Ceri Marlo ) Corporate
Officer ) Property Owner ) by its authorized signatories: ) ) ) ) ) ) _________________________________________ ) signature ) ) ) ) _________________________________________ ) print
name
Page 11 of 16 Schedule A: Town Centre Goals and Objectives Checklist PRINCIPLE: 1 Each Neighbourhood is Complete Goal: Increase density and distribute a range of uses throughout the
Centre Objectives: Increase density for residential and non-residential land uses Incorporate a range of densities Incorporate mixed use development opportunities Ensure opportunities
for living, working, shopping, and service provision Integrate waterfront development into the Centre Develop on currently undeveloped lots Create links between the Centre and
other hubs within Maple Ridge Goal: Enhance opportunities for personal development and recreation Objectives: Provide educational/training facilities Enhance technological capabilities
so people can take advantage of world opportunities Develop cultural facilities Improve recreation opportunities, particularly for youth Improve and secure public access to natural
places, including streams and waterfront Provide more public green space within the core Promote the social integration of all ages and groups through shared or adjacent facilities
and spaces Design easily accessed public spaces Ensure public safety and security, and accessibility throughout the Centre
Page 12 of 16 PRINCIPLE: 2 Options to our cars exist Goal: Acknowledge and respect pedestrian needs Objectives: Prioritize the safety of pedestrians Enhance pedestrian experience
Designate pedestrian-only areas/no-car zones Enhance connectivity of pedestrian and other non-vehicular routes Utilize and upgrade laneways, sidewalks and other existing paths
for pedestrians, bikes Design for short walking distances to reach daily needs Goal: Increase transit modes, availability and destinations Objectives: Establish an internal transit
system for the Centre Increase the frequency of transit service both internally and to out-lying areas Consider other transit modes Link new Abernethy crossing to transit Increase
and improve access from river to Centre Provide water transportation options Ensure public safety for all transportation modes PRINCIPLE: 3 Work in harmony with natural systems
Goal: Preserve, enhance and capitalize on natural amenities and create new ones Objectives: Respect and enhance riparian areas and water resources Maintain views of mountains
Maintain access and views to Fraser River Protect and enhance a range of wildlife habitats Reinstate historical streams Goal: Protect natural systems from the impacts of development
Objectives: Increase quality and amount of green space in the Centre Establish a green system that is linked throughout the Centre and beyond Reduce the generation of water pollution,
air pollution and waste Manage pollution and waste with Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Page 13 of 16 PRINCIPLE: 4 Buildings and infrastructure are greener and smarter Goal: Make it easier to be environmentally friendly Objectives: Identify and act on appropriate urban
ecology opportunities Provide incentives for the development of environmentally friendly buildings Have municipality adopt green building and infrastructure standards Educate
on environmental benefits of growing smarter Increase quality, function and amount of mandatory public/open/green space built by developers Goal: Combine new technologies with rediscovered
approaches Objectives: Incorporate alternative methods of power generation Require sustainable buildings and building systems Design buildings to adapt to future technologies
and uses Minimize environmental impact of erosion and waste disposal during construction Adaptively reuse existing buildings, including heritage buildings Manage urban stormwater
with green infrastructure methods Develop green infrastructure that provides for multiple land uses PRINCIPLE: 5 Housing serves many needs Goal: Increase housing options to provide
for all ages, economic status, and life stages Objectives: Integrate housing for all demographics Ensure a variety of housing types and tenures that are fully accessible and accommodate
special needs Integrate affordable housing/low-cost housing with market housing Improve rental housing stock and options Improve housing quality and range of housing types Design
housing for flexibility of use over its lifetime Design housing to strengthen social relationships Provide housing for people in transition
Page 14 of 16 Goal: Increase density in the Centre by integrating housing with other uses Objectives: Increase residential density and identify density limits Integrate housing with
other uses at the scale of both building and block Establish attractive form and character and mitigate noise to make housing in the centre desirable PRINCIPLE: 6 Jobs are close to
home Goal: Encourage all types of jobs, including new and non-traditional businesses and workplaces Objectives: Provide an educational centre to train for jobs and to provide teaching
and other jobs Increase civic development and retail development for job creation Incorporate high tech, internet, home businesses Incorporate live/work and work/live developments
Welcome unique industries/business opportunities Make zoning and bylaws less restrictive for location and form of business premises, while retaining a positive sense of community
Promote the film industry Promote the tourism industry Goal: Attract investment by supporting business needs Objectives: Attract investment in housing and business ventures
Densify the Centre to provide a customer base for businesses Identify and promote niche markets for business Develop the industry potential already present in Maple Ridge and support
local businesses Pre-install technological infrastructure in buildings to attract businesses Streamline development approval processes and provide incentives Provide venues to
support arts and crafts businesses PRINCIPLE: 7 The Centre is distinctive, attractive and vibrant Goal: Cultivate an identity that grows from the heart of the community Objectives:
Develop the “caring” identity of Maple Ridge Ensure that historical and cultural assets are respected and celebrated Feature the natural beauty and amenities of the place Establish
development guidelines that respect local heritage, natural settings and attributes Support the arts in the community Encourage art in public and private spaces
Page 15 of 16 Enhance the urban public environment Goal: Establish the Centre as a hub of activity Objectives: Increase tourism Provide opportunities for festivals and community
events Provide more entertainment and education venues Encourage evening activities that cater to a broad demographic while benefitting the community Utilize park space for daily
activities as well as special events Create easily accessible routes to key destinations Encourage symbiotic relationships among and between lands and land users Support and encourage
the vitality of small business PRINCIPLE: 8 Everyone has a voice Goal: Create safe spaces and opportunities for all members of the community Objectives: Create spaces and opportunities
for all age groups and social stratas Integrate spaces to foster social relationships Empower the least powerful Ensure safety Goal: Create opportunities for open dialogue among
members of the community Objectives: Establish ongoing public evaluation of smart growth strategies Provide public gathering spaces Ensure economic development office advocates
for local business and interacts effectively with all levels of government
Page 16 of 16 Schedule B: Town Centre Investment Incentives Area