Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-06-26 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfCorporation of the District of Maple Ridge June 26, 2007 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber MEETING DECORUM Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be reprimanded. Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 OPENING PRAYERS Les Warriner - Living Way Foursquare Church 300 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS 400 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 500 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 501 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of June 12, 2007 502 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of June 5, 6, 7, 8 (2), 15, 19, 2007 Page 1 Council Meeting Agenda June 26, 2007 Council Chamber Page 2 of 7 600 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 700 DELEGATIONS 701 Haney Farmers Market Society - Cathy Hiebert, Chair; Elke Knetchel, Co Chair 702 Maple Ridge -Pitt Meadows Bicycle Advisory Committee - Dave Rush, Chair 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 801 DVP/112/06, 23840 River Road To vary the minimum width of a maneuvering aisle and to vary the maximum percentage of permitted car spaces in support of a two -storey building. 802 DVP/033/06, 12329 and 12339 Hillside Street and 22210 and 22214 124 Avenue To relax the front and rear setbacks and driveway aisle and to vary the size of the common activity area, the maximum percentage of permitted small car spaces and the number of storeys from 2.5 to 3 to permit a 29-unit townhouse development. 900 CORRESPONDENCE 1000 BYLAWS Bylaws for Final Reading 1001 RZ/086/06, 22141119 Avenue Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6443-2006 Staff report dated June 15, 2007 recommending final reading To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to CD-1-00 (Comprehensive Development) to permit the construction of a seniors' residential complex. Final reading. Council Meeting Agenda June 26, 2007 Council Chamber Page 3 of 7 1002 RZ/055/06, 24180 and 24208 102 Avenue Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6432-2006 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6434-2006 Staff report dated June 18, 2007 recommending final reading To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) to permit subdivision into approximately 24 lots). Final reading. 1003 RZ/033/06, 12329/12339 Hillside Street and 22210/22214 124 Ave Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6427-2006 Staff report dated June 19, 2007 recommending final reading To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit a 29 unit townhouse development. Final reading. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE 1100 Minutes - June 18, 2007 The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting. Public Works and Development Services 1101 RZ/121/06, 21544 and 21550 Donovan Avenue, RS-1 and RS-1b to R-1 Staff report dated June 4, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6488-2007 to permit the subdivision of two parcels into three equal lots be given first reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. 1102 RZ/119/06, 13080 240 Street, RS-2 and RS-3 to RS-1b Staff report dated June 7, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6481-2007 to permit a subdivision into 5 single family lots be given first reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. Council Meeting Agenda June 2S.2O07 Council Chamber Page 4of7 1103 ' 23267 Silver Valley Road, 13750 232 Street, RS'3 to RS-1. RS-1b,8nd RM-1 Staff report dated June 5. 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending 0v|OYV No. 0483-2007 to permit @ multi -family residential subdivision COOSiStiOg of townhouses and single family residences be given first reading and forwarded tOPublic Hearing. Staff report dated June 7' 2007 [eCO[DnleDdiOg that the K8aDOge[ Of Legislative Services be authorized to notify qualifying property owners that approval of OVp/086/(}6 for variances to setbacks, PDOf height. stair St[UCtU[eS and the Ol8XiDlVn0 percentage Of permitted SDla|| C@[ parking spaces will beconsidered byCouncil atthe July 1{},2{}{}7meeting and that UpOD f@VOUrGb|e CODSide[8ti0D of DVp/(}86/(]6, the Corporate Officer be authorized to Sign and SSa| DP/(}86/(}0 in support Ofa seniors' residential CO[0p|eX. Staff report dated June 8. 2007 [eC0nl[DeDdiDg that the Manager Of Legislative Services be authorized to notify qualifying property owners that approval 0fVp/{)21/07 to reduce the 8Ol0UOt of frontage being serviced will beconsidered byCouncil 8tthe July 10,2(}(}7meeting. 1106 8/07,HOmesite Severance (SVbdivisioO) Within the Agricultural Land Reserve Staff report dated June 11' 2007 [eCO00eDdiDg that 8pp|iC@dOD A|/038/07 for hODleSite S8Ve[UOC8 (SUhdiViSi0D) Of |8DU within the AgriCU|tV[8| Land Reserve b8authorized t0 proceed tOthe Agricultural Land C0r0r0iSSiOD. 1107 Canada Day Event Staff report dated ]VOe 7. 2007 [eCOnl0eDdiDg that K48ph) Ridge/Pitt K4eGdOvvS Parks & Leisure Services be authorized to use OOUDicip8| sidewalks and streets OOSaturday, July 1.2(}{}6for the annual Canada Day event. Council Meeting Agenda June 26.20O7 Council Chamber Page 5 of 7 1108 Caribbean Street Festival Staff report dated June 7. 2007 [eCODl0CDding the USC Of DlUDiCip8| streets be authorized for the ODDU8/ Caribbean Street Festival OD SUOd@y, July 15,2OO7. 1109 Maple Ridge Development Process Staff report dated jUDe 4. 2(}07 [eCOn1DleDdiOg bylaw, pO/iCy, and procedural changes tOthe development process. 1109.1 Maple Ridge Development Permit Delegation Bylaw No'6478-2007 A bylaw to delegate authority to review and approve DliO0[ amendments to UHv8|0p0e0t permit plans and to issue environmental development permits. First, second and third readings 1I09.2 Maple Ridge Development Procedures Amending Bylaw No. 6477-2007 Abylaw tOamend the process for development applications. First, second and third readings 1109.3 Development Variance Permits Notification A recommendation tOauthorize staff t0send the required notification for development variance permits. Financial and Corporate Services Lincludiud Fire and Police) 1131 2008 Annual Report and Statement DfFinancial Information Staff report dated June Z3.2C07recommending that the 2005AnDU8| Report be received and the Statement OfFinancial |DfO[D18tiOD (S(]F|)fOr the year ended December 31, 20(}6 be approved. Note: The District OfMaple Ridge 20O0Annual Report iSavailable tOthe public for viewing 8tMunicipal Hall and is posted OD the [)iSt[iCt'SVYebSite. Staff report dated M@y3O. 2007 SUbDlh1iOg information OO changes tQthe Council Meeting Agenda June 26, 2007 Council Chamber Page 6 of 7 Community Development and Recreation Service 1151 Fraser Valley Regional Library Operating and Services Agreement Staff report dated May 31, 2007 recommending that the Mayor and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign the Fraser Valley Regional Library Operating and Services Agreement for 2007. Correspondence - Nil Other Committee Issues - Nil 1200 STAFF REPORTS 1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL 1400 MAYOR'S REPORT 1500 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS 1600 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 1700 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS 1800 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC 1900 ADJOURNMENT Council Meeting Agenda June 26, 2007 Council Chamber Page 7 of 7 QUESTION PERIOD The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. If a member of the public has a concern related to a Municipal staff member, it should be brought to the attention of the Mayor and/or Chief Administrative Officer in a private meeting. The decision to televise the Question Period is subject to review. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes only to ask their question (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, it will be responded to at a later date at a subsequent Council Meeting. Other opportunities to address Council may be available through the Clerk's Department who can be contacted at (604) 463-5221. Checked b : 6X - l _ Date: �6_�� DEVELOPMENT • COMMITTEE MINUTES I June 5, 2007 Mayor's Office Mayor Gordon Robson Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary 1. DP/033/06 LEGAL: Lot 32, District Lot 399, Group 1, Plan 26005, NWD LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS 12339 Hillside Street EFS (Hillside) Developments Ltd. Discharge of Statutory Right of Way THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO DP/033/06. CARRIED lfc�,O� z L Mayor (jordon Robson Chairman J.L. (Jinf) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Lo T4-4-rl— I zc��\j CL 1- B 23 =12404 1 0) r, 2 0 C14 C\1 12417 N 04 C\j 2 I:P 7 1 966 00 fl- 00 00 C4 CIA I ("i CFo\j Rem D EP 13727 A RP 12909 W� 12297 P 15728 8 9 10 (0 LO 1- 10 co C\j 123 AVE. o SCALE 1:1,500 C) District of Pitt Meadows District of Langley 00 00 NCD co C) 00 N Cq Cq N M (N Cq C\I C4 C4 Cq 1 N N 2 N M Rem 35 co REM. A 0- P 27048 3 12370 (P 26005) 4 K1 10406 12360 5 CD N 12 z Subject Property E 32 6 LID CD 12339 12340 C) 22 7 12329 12330 21 W 8 12319 0 Fn 12320 C14 r 0 (0 20 91 12313 2312 10 19 12301 12306 Rem S1/2 16 R 11 P 1112 40 12294 *PP119 (0 M 12295 P — 12 (0 CY) 41 CD 13 12275 12286 si I SiN6rvalley, 124 AVE. 1 LMP 4403 12339 Hillside St CORPORATION OF • MAPLE RIDGE THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Jun 5, 2007 FILE: Untitled BY: JV River- CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES June 6, 2007 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Mayor Gordon Robson Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. SOMMI, KEVIN & GILLIAN LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 1, District Lot 248, Group 1, Plan 60208, New Westminster District 11530 Anderson Place Kevin & Gillian Sommi Section 219 Covenant — Fraser River Escarpment THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO KEVIN & GILLIAN SOMMI. Mayor Gordon Robson Chairman MR I A, !,"- 5 no J.L. ( n) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer MemYer 11591 11584 11601 d d0 \ 11585 0 267 2 Rem 7 E N o oP0 N "� 11599 3 N R1v ER R N CV �c9 N 11666 N 4 m 7510 2 3 a 268 1 co 1 0 563 1 11580 89 EP 134 P 35427 No 0 11 11593 11567 1 U'1 — 11587 284 4 N v 0- 2 269 P 4469 N 11544 P 11550 v U 5 ,1 592 LMS 1692 m 11559 11556 Rem 1 11583 283 IL 270 11555 2 12 1,�� 2 P 10213 2 11546 11551 6 282 a P 11611 11542 N N 11577 -7 i6 1 B r i � 271 1\b ,��j P 11547 �0� ;,, Q 11 0 7 d m� 281 52 11537 11569 (P A 11543 11530 2 1 �. 11530 272 1,5�0 rn 280 ° "LMP 2' 11528 0 10 11557 11531 8 273 1562 11520 N 11527 N P N 11520 291 1 N 11543 11558 1 9 RP 30767C 274 11550 2 11510 11515 11502 ti� 3 Il�' w o 292 0 15g�9 210 211 co P a P 4 584 11496 1 2 N SUBJECT PROPERTY 13 Rem L l�n 275 11484 0- n 11468 rn gist of —1 J r Pitt Meadows ___q � � � SiNerVa y / 11530 ANDERSON PLACE o_ ` Y -r o CORPORATION OF � 9 l THE DISTRICT OF cmumMAPLE RIDGE E p7slriCt Of Albion � _ J PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley SCALE 1:2,000 DATE: Jun 5, 2007 FILE: Untitled BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES June 7, 2007 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Mayor Gordon Robson Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. BROOKES, DANIEL & DEBRA LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 1, District Lot 277, Group 1, Plan 23319, New Westminster District 20710 Lome Avenue Daniel & Debra Brookes Section 219 Covenant — Floodplain THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO DANIEL & DEBRA BROOKES. CARRIFT) J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Chairman CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES June 8, 2007 Mayor's Office 'G_149raw Mayor Gordon Robson Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. DP/086/06 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot A, District Lot 397, Group 1, Plan 28220, NWD 22141 119'h Avenue Maple Ridge Seniors Village Holdings Ltd. Covenants — Exterior Design (LEEDS); Senior's Use; Visitor Parking. Rezoning Servicing Agreement THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO DP/086/06. Chairman C J.L. (JRb) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member i 7 -- 12050 --- 66 -... —12053 81 -- - 106 m J a � P 20 ,� � � rn 18 P 15319 10 a 12050 � tzosl lzoso � r17 1zos1 0- 80z�3 107 1204667 A t20479 CHURCH AVE. 1 12046 zo4a 12048 LIMP 8411 fQQ� 79 108 F ikt 12042 68 4 0) _1 a 12041 2 12042 8 ^ 12040 � 12041 12032 12038 n 12029 11 12034 69 o) E ° 20 n 7 3 7 a 7612037 109 oo P 14898 3 P 20094 12028 12026 "1 C 12028 P 14571 P 1 571 1202s m 279 o P 29 4 a P 669 141 142 ; 4 5 6 110 D 0 2 1 ^ Am 12015 a 278 d Gk r tY Rem 43 65 m 7 8 13 14 P 1,1113 P8 28 11993 11970 11973 6 12 11963 5 11 11962 11953 4 10 1952 N 11943 3 co 9 11942 n- a 2 811945 11932 M V r 1 a a- 7 H rn N N H rn N N 119 AVE. 56 55 54 53 52 51 P 4049 11887 P 11251 22 21 20 19 18 17 11875 SELKIRK AVE. 11 12 13 14 15 16 P 11251 11851 N P 11251 (P 11251) N 6 5 4 3 B District of Pitt Meadows _ J S r iDowntownl iHairey _ /District of Langley SCALE 1:2,500 DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. W r N 1/2 E 1/2 "A" N E P 70168 n P 632 5N NWS 2870 aEi of w Pd. P 6: in N 79 NWS 418 N P36157 P4 11960 6 P 8148 5 P 8148 11926 f— N N N 50 49 48 47 46 N 45 1 2 N 68 P 4049 P 61 50 11888 11901 P 11251 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 11868 a 69 11867 Rem Rem Rem Rem 40 39 38 37 242 11950 P 11251 P 62478 11841 A P 67821 H P 16304 P 81 8 (P 8380) P 83� 4 3 2 1 A of A 11916 B 5 4� 3 P 78577 NWS 2948 P OS NWS 2762 NWS 611 (P 6808) P 76483 P 74121 N 22 21 20 19 P 68 61 P 3808 EA- a1 29 30 31 � i 22139/49/57/68/75 119 AVENUE ' - ! LOT 83, PLN34526 L - CORPORATION OF jT-� - t� ke, iE. THE DISTRICT OF li !o MAPLE RIDGE MAPLETh hill PLANNING DEPARTMENT J y DATE: Sep 13, 2006 FILE: DP/086/06 BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES June 8,2007 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Mayor Gordon Robson Chairman Jim Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. RZ/065/05 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS A. Allen, Recording Secretary Strata Plan of Lot C, District Lot 397, Group 1, Plan BCP22636, New Westminster District 22150 Dewdney Trunk Road Donada Industries Ltd.. Strata Plan THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO RZ/065/05. Chairman CARRIED Jim Rqe, Chief Administrative Officer Memr 12 c N 12047 1 9 a. 12059 lzoae CHURCH AVE. 12046 12041 12042 2 8 79 108 r 1- N t1l 12040 _ 12oa1 12032 �- 12029 to i IL �- 3 7 109 P 14898 2935 78 -- r` 12028 10 C 12037 12026 co 12025 N a P 14571 P 145 1 279 4 5 6 �y m 12015 110 N A a 278 n N N N N N N fV DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. SUBJECT PROPERTIES N N 13 14 M g A 91 N r � N P87 8 a N1/2 N1/2 11993 to a 2 3 1 A 11973 2 °i N P 3175 O 12 1 a NWS 3374 11970 w Z P 8 98 11963 11 P 3175 2 P 84262 "60 S 1 oo 11953 U% fr7 10 cv 1ss5 3 N N 11952 11943 N 4 9 4 a 83 _ 11951 v vco 11942 n N 11941 8 11945 5 - 11932 P 138 P 11 1 82 P� 120 1 76 77 1 2 N _ co to 6 7 N 6 ~ uN1 1 N °� « N a N to 1' �s`^i1�1AS y.�J3+Zi11�'Vti. a 11929 119 AVEcn — N N i N 1 i 22136 & 22150 DEWDNEY TRt.lNK RD r� is O I CORPORATION OF = ock i ° THE DISTRICT" OF hi9 L _� MAPLE RIDGE MAPLERIDGE Incorporated 12, September, 1874 PLANNING L)PPARTMENT SCALE 1:1,500 -- �F DATE: Aug22005 FILE: DP/065/0 . BY: PC Rive, ug , n_- �^__ — � CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES June 15, 2007 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Mayor Gordon Robson Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary 1. WINICK, RONALD LEGAL: Lot F, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 21461, New Westminster District, LOCATION: 21434 121 Avenue OWNER: Ronald Winick REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Building Development Agreement THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO RONALD WINICK. Chairman J.L. (Jiro) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Membet V 767 2153 2 O Cp 2 E N N 12716 w % d- N 12106 4 '095 72094 5 )93 6 N �83 GLENWOOD AVE. 21470 7 v N lv CAMPBELL AVE. 121 AVE. Nl- wok • CORPORATION OF THE )�bvo wak DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE ENGINEERING Incorporated 12 September, IB74 DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LOT F, 21434 121 AVENUE FILE E05 121 001 SCALE: N.T.S. FILE/DING No BUILD 0008 DATE: JUNE 2007 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES June 19, 2007 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Mayor Gordon Robson Chairman Jim Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member A. Allen, Recording Secretary 1. SD/005/06 LEGAL: Parcel 'C' (Ref. Plan 7680) SE/4 Section 32, Township 12, NWD Parcel 'D' (Ref. Plan 7680) SE 1/4 Section 32, Township 12, NWD LOCATION: 13935 232 Street & 14041 232 Street OWNER: Progressive Construction Ltd. REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Covenants — No Build; Infiltration System; Geotech; Floodplain. Subdivision Servicing Agreement Turn -Around Agreement Statutory Right of Way (Storm Sewer) x 3 Statutory Right of Way (Watermain) x 2 I a V 11"i IM x 13 10011111*110 1 oleo &V.Vm I OM I Dim OR x W-111 Chairman I Jim Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 141 AV District of _ Pitt Meadows: - s'`ve'leY i 13935 & 1041 232 STREET Down2ow0 r _ t2 CORPORATION OF I Haney � - w p �� °eke _ I° THE DISTRICT OF District of mb,.1 _ ; t — p MAPLE RIDE Lan le rnomnei MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:3,000 � - DATE: Sep 13, 2006 FILE: SD/005/06 BY: PC River .. From: eileen dwillies [mailto:edwillies@hotmail.com] Sent: June 4, 2007 10:05 AM To: Amanda Gaunt Cc: allherb@telus.net; tpg03@telus.net Subject: RE: Delegation to Council Dear Amanda: Further to our telephone conversation, the Haney Farmers Market Society would appreciate being put on the agenda for the June 26 Council meeting. At this time we would be presenting an update on the activities of the Market and advising of some future plans. Looking forward to your confirmation, Regards, Ea--ew L)WU tAZ6' Haney Farmers Market, Secretary 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, B.C., V2X 6A9 604-467-8424 www.eileenscreativecooking.com www.lesdames.ca www.ldei.org District of Maple Ridge 11995 Hanev Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Telephone:604-463-5221 Fax:604-467-7329 e-mail: enduiriesamapleridge.org www.mapleridge.org June 13, 2007 File No: 3090-20/DVP/112/06 Dear Sir/Madam: PLEASE TAKE NOTE that the Municipal Council will be considering a Development Variance Permit at the regular meeting to be held on June 26, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge. The particulars of the Development Variance Permit are as follows: APPLICATION NO.: DVP/112/06 LEGAL: Lot 4, District Lot 405, Plan 7324, New Westminster District LOCATION: 23840 River Rd CURRENT ZONING: M-2 (General Industrial) PROPOSED ZONING: M-3 (Business Park Zone) PURPOSE: Prior the proposed construction of a 2 story building, the following variances are required: • relaxation of the minimum width of the maneuvering aisle from 7.3 meters to 6.87 meters • increase of the maximum percentage of small car spaces AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that a copy of the Planning Department report dated May 25, 2007, relative to this application will be available for inspection at the Municipal Hall, Planning Department counter during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. from June 13 to June 26, 2007. ALL PERSONS who deem themselves affected hereby shall be afforded an opportunity to make their comments known to Municipal Council by making a written submission to the attention of the Manager of Legislative Services or by sending an e-mail to the Clerk's Department at clerks(a)..mapleridge.ca , by 4:00 p.m., June 26, 2007. Yours truly, AgIC4� A&16� Ceri Mario Manager of Legislative Services /aa Att. cc: Confidential Secretary "Promoting a Safe and Livable Communitt- for our Present and Future Citizens" 80 L."'UGHEED HWY. Distract of I I Pitt MeaacYws:.11c�--_ .J W— vefty 23840 RIVER ROAD D.^r CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF Z--]! Langley 4=1 N C MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RITYIPLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:3.000 IDATE: Nov 2,2006 FILE:RZ/112/06 BY: PC District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Telephone:604-463-5221 Fax:604-467-732c) MAPLE �� e-mail: enquiries«mapleridge.org www.mapleridge.org j une 13, 2007 File No: 3090-20/DVP/033/06 Dear Sir/Madam: PLEASE TAI,E NOTE that the Municipal Council wrill be considering a Development Variance Permit at the regular meeting to be held on June 26, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge. The particulars of the Development Variance Permit are as follows: APPLICATION NO.: DVP/033/06 LEGAL: Lot 22, Plan 16012; Lot 16, Plan 1112; Lot 35, Plan 27048 & Lot 32, Plan 26005 all of District Lot 399, Group 1, New Westminster District LOCATION: 12329 Hillside Street, 22210 124 Avenue, 22214 124 Avenue, and 12339 Hillside Street. CURRENT ZONING: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) PROPOSED ZONING: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) PURPOSE: Prior to the proposed construction of a townhouse development, the following variances are required: • relaxation of the front and rear yard setbacks • variance from 2.5 storeys to 3 storeys — maximum permitted height will remain • variance of the total area of the common activity area • increase of the maximum percentage of allowable `small car' spaces • relaxation of drivewav aisle width from 7 meters to 6 meters AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that a copy of the Planning Department report dated May 25, 2007, relative to this application will be available for inspection at the Municipal Hall, Planning Department counter during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. from June 13 to June 26, 2007. ALL, PERSONS who deem themselves affected hereby shall be afforded an opportunity to make their comments known to Municipal Council by making a written submission to the attention of the Manager of Legislative Services or by sending an e-mail to the Clerk's Department at clerks(amapleridge.ca , by 4:00 p.m., June 26, 2007. Yours truly, Cen Mar Manager of Legislative Services /aa Att. cc: Confidential Secretary "Prrnnoting a Safe and Livable Cornmuniry for our Present and Future Citizens " 10( , K""ded Pape+ a i82 8 kr41 rn 1xat1 173 P 147 172 � i 7 a 181 uasa 168 169 170 171 138 k1y4 6 D - _ 12455 180 5 IsAAC CRES. t2447 � , 179 4 � ixdSi g 177 153 178 3 174 175 176 a 12431 h65 166 2440 r� 2 } a 124" (7 P 147 154 A N 162 161 160 159 158 157 156 155 R 1241 m - ® a 12420 Fj ii 12425 12342 ns3 Rem p p p Q B r 247 5827 1 2 1Rom 2 o P 827 c a P 76 Rem 35 REM A 15 39 38 12470 n t2a71 N 1x4te 16 12462 a 40 N N 124M A 17 12454 124®, 124W B 9 18 5 124M 33 � 12451 19 12450 120 MY a 32 4 124M sisal 92429 124" j 1 21 � 12 V 3 LMP 12101 2424 P 75 22 124u 1 2 Rem 3 23 1a4a 12417 124 AVE. 248 Z7048 3 a 206 12s2o I 12375 12374 (P 26005) 205 1zw 4 207 K110406 1230 123a SUBJECT PROPERTIES � 12]50 N 5 � i 204 � 208 m 122l9C 1n5s ,- > c 203 ,2>a7 209 _32 E a Vxw 6 123" n3e o tr � 123M 210 co 7 0- 1y� tzm rn p 202 ,23xa o 0 8 n,7 211 M a A 21 /n2o 1 mts r RP 12909 N 9 20 LMP 4403 212 m 1nu 12312 a 10 N 213 2297 19 12706 Rem S 1 /2 16 LMS 608 P 1572 1 11 0 39057 8 9 10 P 1112 40 12"4 � 12295 ^ 12 m r, 2.21 123 AVE. a 41 m Distnct of Pm Meadows so v 22210, 22214 124 Avenue 12329, 12339 Hillside Avenue CORPORATION OF _ ruwov_. THE DISTRICT OF I p - Distnct of �, fo A P L E R I 2angteY 7ho MOH MAPLE RLLGE-y - -� PLANNING DEPARTMENT _;4 DATE Jun 15, 2006 FILE:RZ/033/06 v 1 RO TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 15, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/086/06 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: COUNCIL SUBJECT: Final Reading: Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6443-2006 22141119 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Bylaw No 6443-2006 has been considered by Council and at Public Hearing on March 20, 2007 and subsequently granted 2°,i and 3,6 reading on March 27, 2007. The applicant has requested that final reading be granted. The purpose of the rezoning is to permit the construction of "Maple Ridge Senior's Village" a seniors' residential complex with 108 licensed care beds and 81 assisted living apartments. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6443-2006 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on March 20, 2007. On March 27, 2007 Council granted 2n,1 and 3,6 reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6443-2006 with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed: i) Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; ii) Registration of a Rezoning Development Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; iii) A geotechnical report which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iv) Road dedication as required; v) Consolidation of the six lots on the development site; vi) Removal of the existing buildings and clearing all the debris from site; vii) Registration of a 219 Restrictive Covenant for the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Green Building Rating System components that will be included on the final project design plans; viii) Registration of a 219 Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office restricting the use to seniors only; ix) Registration of a 219 Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office securing visitor parking on the site; Me follo«nng applies to the above: ® The Planning Department received the certified copy of Maple Ridge Bylaw No.6443-2006 from the Ministry of Transportation on May 4, 2007; • The applicant has registered a Rezoning Servicing Agreement on title and paid the required deposit of security to the District as stipulated in the agreement; • A Geotechnical Report which recommends suitability of this development on site has been submitted; • The lots have been consolidated and the plan with road dedication and consolidation has been registered in the Land Title Office; ■ The applicant has submitted demolition permits to remove the buildings on site and clear all debris from site; ■ A 219 Restrictive Covenant for the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Green Building Rating System components that will be included on the final project design plans has been registered on title; ■ A 219 Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office restricting the use to seniors only has been registered on title; ■ A 219 Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office securing visitor parking on the site has been registered on title. CONCLUSION: This will be a useful facility for the aging seniors of Maple Ridge, both for independent living and as a care facility for the dependent. Due to it's location within the town centre, the seniors who do not drive can easily walk to most of the civic amenities or use the public transport. As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that final reading be given to the bylaw. Prepared by. Rasika Acharya Plaatner II. Approved 'ic �CP, MCIP TNterCof of Plannin Approved by. Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GSM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: :appendix A — Site Plan ::Appendix B — Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6443-2006 Appendix C- Architectural Plans Appendix D- Landscape Plans -2- IRem I 165 Cr Y C 12053 18 10 �= 81 m 12061 P 15319 n 2MCO N 12046 67 p. 12N7 N 80 1 9 it 12053 12048 12042 68 .- 1" lrni 2 12042 8 79 1zo4o � 1zo41 12034 69 0_ 12029 3 7 0 12028 78 12037 P 29 P 14571 P 1 571 1292s m 279 141 142 : 4 5 6 ti 3 8 9 1zo1s CO 278 r g 7 8 " 13 14 P 1 113 P8 28 11993 11970 11973 6 12 11983 5 11 11962 11953 4 10 1952 CO N 11943 3 2 9 11942 0- 2 81,945 11932 'M,• 1 o n a 7 0 H N N N N 119 AVE. I o I56 55 54 53 52 51 P 4049 116e7 P 1251 22 21 20 19 18 17 r 1/875 SELKIRK AVE. ni o a 11 12N 13N 14 r 15N 16 P 11251 11E51 1. P 1251 (P 11251) N 16 5 4 3 g District of Pitt Meadows i SCALE 1:2.500 106 E m 12M CO a 107 12048 108 12032 109 CO 1202E a 110 J l o H; G N it �" 120E1 CHURCH AVE. F P 14898 Cb E12M5 C a D 0 DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. � lnlVV - n_ N y M H N N `� 49 48 47 „ 46 45 1 2 68 P 4049 P 61 I'mae 1251 25 26 27 28 TP 29 30 31 32 9feEE n 0 A a 69 91EE7 Rem «Rem Rem 'Rem 40 " 39 38 37 242 11eso P 1251 P 62478 i,B41 P 67821 Distnctof Langley 'cam Thor.WN _ 1— _ r` 74, I V� ,nee LIMP 8411 i i 4 m t 12038 3 7 12me ! P 20094 �y P 69 ?i �2 1 Aol EL -A. N70168 WS 287C 6321 r 1 i980 1--� I PC! (n t NWS 418 N P 36157 P 4d 11,980 I I 6 P Pt 148 i P 16304 1192E N P 81 8 1 1 (P 8380) 838 4 3 2 AofA N , 1191E N L �( N I y i Q- P 78577 i� 5 NWS 29Q I PNWS 2762 I FLAYS 2611 - (P 76483 P 74121 22 21 20 19 - l n p 1 2361 _ 30 31l i CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6443-2006 A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6443-2006." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 76, District Lot 397, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 32138 Lot 77, District Lot 397, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 32138 Lot 1, District Lot: 397, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 11291 Lot 2, District Lot: 397, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 11291 Lot 82, District Lot 397, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 34526 Lot 83, District Lot 397, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 34526 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1378 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, are hereby rezoned to CD- 1-00 (Comprehensive Development). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of 200. 3 P 14571 4 18.3 131 14 P8728 11993 1197J 12 11963 20.1 11953 10 11943 N 9 0 8 71,9451 0 0 7 � 7 a 109 P 14898 12035 12028 78 C 12037 72026 C P 14571 25 QD 0 5 6 279 D c0 72015 15.2 110 '\ h NI � a 278 NLi `n N DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. o N N � l �B i A d-CC) a00 CD( 1 I W1 \2 C P 3175 1 1 a a 3: NWS 3374 11970 . Lj w z BCP j 22636 P 3175 RW 27912 119602 0.465na P 84262 S 100' 11965 03 71952 3 � � '- d ! cD Ln 8 3 r 4 11957 °U 4 � � _ 71942 � � a � 5 11941 119325 � �Ln 76 P 32138 P 77 �1 11291 82 �2 d h 1 P 11291 6 �o 6 aN N iN N N 11929 19 AVE, ro 18 ''7 of I 11875 18.3 50 49 48 47 46 45 1 2 P ,14049 P 6 550 11888 I � �i j P 111251; I ( 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 1186E N N N N N I N i N SELKIRK AVE. 68 0 17901 CLN 69 11867 VAP' E RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6443-2006 Map No. 1378 rom: RS-1 (One Fcmily Urban Residential) CD-1 —00 (Comprehensive Development) 20.1 3 115.2 12028 o P 9669 Ln 0 2 Am N N � N EP 5406 N N co P 70168 E NWS 2870ci� Li 11980 79 P 36157 11960 6 P 8148 5 P 8148 11926 ai I P 8148 4 3 ") 2 1 11916 1 N I N N P 78577 N 5 P NWS 2948 NWS 2762 NWS 2611 P 76483,) P 74121 c� c N c zkoBe -. MAPLE RIDGE 1 :2000 Q R R iF R t g� F iI �wiw��lz ���R3 PtG 3q� i E 1 � RR � fttt}gff} ��Ri� 9y ff � a ��Qjj `` ((iiiit(t( �y�Ej�1�tliffSSi� ]y7jQ� A p€ h 4 bh G x [!q 4 mg a t� ----j--------------- 2NV73NH-1 Ij (%r G o 4PPendiX C d axa :aAwa:aso ma�aam aa�ms am im i m�m�mm'mmmm wa�€mm `i w I 'am�n'.-.snn,}i.}{.x.snnmm� E i E E E E E E E E E,Eji n E m i- rvrvnn ax xa aax .- .-.-rv.V xaaaaxxaxxx .V n nn nry �+ ax nxxa:in� n LLg a' i �m 9mmooC aIm - mlmw a>3w 3rc� w�ax�EoSmu�>"y�`� °zw E�nu3�EE w�w iU Im a - I I E E o iKia�Wg ��a zE.. r �ssxxtsxI s€�yye a lwfli€ JU TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 18, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/055/06 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: COUNCIL SUBJECT: Final Reading: Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6432-2006 Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6434-2006 24180 and 24208 102 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6434-2006 has been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently granted 2nd and 31d reading. The applicant has requested that final reading be granted to rezone the subject properties from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential). The purpose of the rezoning is to rezone the permit subdivision into approximately 24 lots not less than 371 m2. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6434-2006 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on October 13, 2006. On October 31, 2006 Council granted 2n1 and 3r11 reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6434-2006 with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed: 1. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; 2. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; 3. Road dedication as required; 4. Park dedication as required; and 5. Approval for road construction on 102 Avenue with respect to Mainstone Creek. The following applies to the above: Approval from the Ministry of Transportation has been granted. The Rezoning Servicing Agreement has been registered at the Land Titles Office under BB409426. The park dedication and road dedication have been secured and the plans have been registered at LT'O under BCP30529. In regards to approval for road construction on 102 Avenue with respect to Mainstone Creek, the applicant has made an application to Department of Fisheries and Oceans and has applied for a Section 9 Notification for Changes In and About a Stream with the Ministry of Environment. Staff is satisfied that the applicant has met the requirements of both DFO and MoE. CONCLUSION: As the applicant has met CounciPs conditions, it is recommended that Final reading be given to the bylaw. M echnician Appr a aing, MCP, MCIP rof Planning, r- Approved by. Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GX: Public Works & Development Services a Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AL/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A — Subject Map Appendix: B — Subdivision Geometry Appendix C — Zone Amending Bylaw 6434-2006 -2- 1317 olo 102 B AVE. O �4`f N NN N M O 3137 3 3 4 33 32L6-7- 37 38 3 40 4 4 44 4 4' 47 10 1 t 1 1 1 11 1 1', 6 5 a L 6 9 A 339 1 a M 69 i 14 16 17 1819 20 21 Q 22 23 24 25 6 to 12 2 12 2 2 2 3 J m d e a N N 102 A AVE. BCP 9309 N 102 A AVE. CORPORATION OF -.."THE DISTRICT OF N O �D On N fp 31092871 J4-5- 27 2 2f 3 31 35 3' 3 3 36 M m Rem. B 11115141312 1 10 j9U 7 6 5 OF B1P3139 BCP313 3 2 P 151 17 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 13 SUBJECT PROPERTIES 2 n m BCP 1 LIMP 35918 14 15 B A 21 (P 19526) 9526 (P 19526) P 19526 BCP 20970 I PARK j8630 IEM. 5 lop 29 30 28 27 44 I- 43 47 46 10095 rn 10096 1 a)85 Q 10086 45 N 42 HILL AVE. 311a; 2§33'N34'N35I;3q-3 District of Pitt Meadows District of Langley 102 AVE LIMP 34684 a :45 9Rm 41 CP 18974 co ] F-� 30 31 E1/2of2 � Rem. N W 1/2 of 2 1 0 19 1 Rem. 32 101 AA M 1 P 39561 9561 P 17 26 BCP 13188 PARK PARK BCP 18974 1c PARK pi0N3 1c 10 CP 18974 N10109 "'Cl) 10105 �1W99 10096 �1' M 10098 C �10097 "10097 10092 N �ia195 10094 m d. to10093 Cn co10095 F- 1o088 V ��10o91 10090 �� 1D�10089 Q 41 PARK ct M10093 Co 10084 Mjn10087 M 10086 ttows N 39l 40 M �j10091 10080 M �10083 N 10082 �10081 �MIt 53 �10089 N ta)76 Z10079 10078 J�10077 a 2 33 J A10077 10070 J �ta)75 0074 V A �10073 10 100 B AVE. 1a to M �6 PARK 25 2q 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 N � 212 � 2a 29 31 30 PARK(Rem) �MAPLE MAPLE, DEPARTMENT 14 1 1 1 1 1 2 21 22 2 2 2 26 L 6 95 SCALE 1:2,500 River � N E \ 0 O O O N of E S` 15` N _ 102 AVE" UE-5 2. 1 ----- 7B7 00 N ao0 i 6i o.oe ( ~ t205 12.Cfi 12(Y� n e,s4b IZ.Oh 2.05 3 351 a 1119 5.41 Ah?e:+s 0.01 9 15,Ob IOgb N tip, 16. Om C' u R 12 O 1_0 15 g N g J F------- -- -- - " 4031 SF r4028 - sr 18.00m----'-- ^ � � _ Ic r A R N AVENUE 4pf 4 W, k �' A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6434-2006." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: and Lot 30, Section 3, Township 12, Plan 39561, New Westminster District Lot 31, Section 3, Township 12, Plan 39561, New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No.1372 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, are hereby rezoned to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 26th day of September, A.D. 2006. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of October, A.D. 2006. READ a second time the 31 st day of October, A.D. 2006. READ a third time the 31st day of October, A.D. 2006. APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this 26`" day of March, A.D. 2007. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of A.D. 2007. 102 A AVE. ak W al Q a a a� a! a a a a N � 6! � i8�9110�111514p3�21110, 5 �101 1�1213�141151161 B 1 p 31 �I�l��2 O *PP004 B A i (P 19526)il (P 19526) i 20970 Rem. B �B,C' 8 7 6 5 �P 313 � ^3 e BCP 1010 BCP 9310 102 AVE 21 31 jN000 19526 0.931 ha 1 0.931 ho L�} 15 16 17 1 19 3 �12�23 24125� 2Q ----- Q �1 �2� 3 4 5 6 7�3j 1011�12i13 hh h e ^�� 1)�\-am � � h R a a a AMP 35918 v v w v p PARK 6 5 4 3 2 1 B P 23 5 CP 18974 1/2 o 930 31 m 78 9 011 2` _ N 101 A AVE. 1.012 h ry 701481 ti 1014216� ti 8 27 26 101j61 7q 413 P 39561 P 39561 25 1or31 101321 P 171 10128 YM 24 Io125 23 1o121 PARK BCP 18974 PARK 10110 20 22 ���� 44 43 BCP 1897 1o1os 21 4 4 9M 4 E e 41Z 4 10095 Cn 70096 I A p c 10102 h 1008 10086 a d-10099 10096 r 1N �� I� ��. 45 ` 42 U7 — �p 1009 10092 cD I009 HILL AVE. 1009.5 10088,,- ff -) r-)tN 1009 � N 41 PARK ,", roo9 m 10084 CD �,1008 W) 4 0 N 10080 � 0 1008 d- 29 Jon 3 3 N 3Z� 3 -3 �N3 -3 3 3�� �4 �10089 N 1oa76 536E4 100� — —�— — t — — — _ _ 2 h3� — �roo�110070� ��100� 0 � 100 B AVE. "\/,A\ PL E RIDGE ZONE AMEND NG bylaw No. 6434-2006 Mai No. 1372 rom: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) R-3(Special Amenity Residential District) MAPLE RIDGE :2000 PLE RIDGE British Cotumhia TO: •u His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 19, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/033/06 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: COUNCIL SUBJECT: Final Reading: Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6427-2006 12329 Hillside Street, 22210124 Avene, 22214124 Avenue, & 12339 Hillside Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6427-2006 has been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently granted 2n1 and 3rd reading. The applicant has requested that final reading be granted. The purpose of the rezoning is to permit the construction of a 29 unit townhouse development. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6427-2006 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on October 17, 2006. On October 31, 2006 Council granted 2°' and 3,d reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6427-2006 with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed: Subsequent to the Public Hearing, on September 12, 2006, Council gave third reading to the subject bylaws and further resolved that prior to any reconsideration of the said bylaws the following conditions must be satisfied: 1) Registration of a Rezoning Development Agreement and security as outlined in the Agreement; 2) A geotechnical report which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development, attached to the site through a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant; 3) A Statutory right of way plan and agreement must be registered at the Land Title Office for a sanitary sewer; 4) Road dedication for Hillside Avenue and for 124,h Avenue, as required by the Engineering Department; 5) Consolidation of the development site,; 6) Removal of the existing buildings; 7) Registration of a 219 Restrictive Covenant for the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Green Building Rating System components that will be included on the final project design plans. Mpg The following comments apply to the above conditions: 1. A Rezoning Servicing Agreement has been registered as a Restrictive Covenant and the required security* deposit has been received. 2. A geotechnical report, dated September 8, 2006, was provided by Levelton Engineering Solutions. addressing suitability of the site for the proposed development along with recommendations for construction. This report has been registered as a Restrictive Covenant. 3. A Statutory right of way plan and agreement has been registered at the Land Title Office for a sanitary sewer. 4. Road dedication for l-liliside Avenue and for 124th Avenue has been registered at the Land Title Office. 5. The development site has been consolidated. 6. The buildings have been removed. 7. The Leadership in Energy and Environment Design Green Building Rating System (LEED) components report has been registered as a Restrictive Covenant. CONCLUSION: As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that final reading be given to the bylaw. ,'� (UaA Prepared by. Diana Hall Pla er ,,1 Approve"y``-Jane Picker' MCP, MCIP Di of1'la 'nz - y Approved bv: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. L. Qim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer DH/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Schedule A: Subject Map Schedule B: Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6427-2006 -2- Schedule A: Subject Map 182 8 `r 15 3& 173 �2142 _G 12471 12470 39 P 147 172 �,� 7 a 16 r, 12471 � 12478 168 169 170 171 �,38 181 12463 12162 M M N A _ 221,4 6 17 a 40 N 1z4ss �'7 124% 12454 180 12161 g ISAAC CRIES. 5 18 124W � 1z447 ,� 33 0 5 � 179 4 19 °' 12451 " N 177 12439 12436 12450 178 153 3 20 a 32 165 166 t- 174 175 176 4 1243/ 12130 12441 2440 1ti 2 21 12429 2444 a' 12423 12122 3 1 P 6 147 2424 62 161 154 A w 22 LMP 1 01 160 159 158 157 156 155 O 12411 1z414 Rem 3 P 75 co 1. R 4 e 1 B a 23 1 2 12425 12120 5 ^� 121W ry 12417 124 AVE. 1-92 Rem _ $ 'D a 8 B 2393 247 " 1 2 tt 5827 1 2 1 ern 2 P 827 a P 76 Rem 206 248Q48 REM. A 3 a 12375 12374 12370 /2362 (P 26005) 205 207 q 12365 SUBJRCT PROPERTIES- ►c110406 12M 12350 zoa 208 5 N 12355 O t0 1,2350 t23V42 ^I 203 209 z 32 6 12339 E a 12339 LI 12336 Cr O 210 N 22 7 a 12329 a-- 1,2330 202 1za2s m rn I2317 211 a A 21 8 12319 J 12320 12314 J 1 RP 12909 N = 0 20 9 p 212 to 12313 12312 a LMP 4403 213 12297 19 10 N 12301 N 12306 P 1572 Rem Silt 16 LMS 60H P 39057 11 22 7 8 9 10 P 1112 40 12294 /2295 n� c" 12 r- m 221 123 AVE. " a 41 0 District of _ Pitt Meadows; __ J " " i 22210, 22214 124 Avenue 12329, 12339 Hillside Avenue _i DOW NOW 1 — !: ®Y� �o CORPORATION OF oc ck O� THE DISTRICT OF 4oC ke District of q -as MA PLE RIDGE i Langley o- 7 n u —�16 T as g}E PLANNING DEPARTMENT Schedule B: Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6427-200C MAPLE RIDGE CORPORATION BY-LAW NO. 6427 - 2006 A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6427 - 2006." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 22, District Lot 399, Group 1, Plan 16012, New Westminster District; and North Half Lot 16, Except: Firstly: Part subdivided by Plan 16012, Secondly: Part subdivided by Plan 26005. Thirdly: Part subdivided by Plan 27048, Fourthly: Part subdivided by Plan LMP18470, District Lot 399, Group 1, Plan 1112, New Wesminster District; and Lot 35, Except Part In Plan LMP17058, Disrict Lot 399, Group 1, Plan 27048, New Westminster District: and Lot 32. District Lot. 399, Group 1, Plan 26005, New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1369 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, is/are hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 12"' day of September, A.D. 2006. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17°i day of October, A.D. 2006. READ a second time the 31 st day of October, A.D. 2006. READ a third time the 31 st day of October, A.D. 2006. CONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. a o V) 172 1 = 181 1246J 12462 v 13 168 169 70 171 �z�� N A rz461� h 1<'1Jt 6 1 7 f 4 40 12466 O r P P 2 66 v I ,'?4' N 12455 12454cN 11461I B n- 12 t ` 1 80 I , 5 18 0 12460 n 12457'' snnc cREs. rn 33 11a 12447 1?446 I 179 4 19 0 12451 5 11 o 18.0 ' N 124J9 124J8 72450 1?445 H "�7 i O �124IL . 32 `v l 65� 166 174�175 �176 178 153 3 124J7 124Jo 20 4 10 1?440 ' 12441 15.2 12444 124JJ - T i 0- i 114 < ,,����L�LT i � � n- 2 1242J 11422 21 12429^ 3 I I1241a 1 I � P b 6147 co 154\I A o 22 LMP 12101 P J 7 000 0 1 124 1162 161 1601 159I158 157 156 155 „ 1 4n �23 Rem cv 20.01 2 N212420 " �' B ry 12417 6.2 h G 12425 ti i ry ti h N' h ry 15.2 h 12421 h O NIN N oN o, co r� pj 124 AVE. �� 12J92 n n e O N b i O yi Nb d ti N ti B �f1J9 18.3 Rem N N h ti h N N ry h 12.2 tii 247 n h ti h h, titi 1 2 h h r 5827 n 1 2 1 em, 2 rn ' Rem v 8 70$ ' 5 co r------ s.o �P 76966 Re 35 co 206� 248 P 2 4 REM. A 3 12J75 112J,74 12J70 12J62 (P 26005) 207 I 205 Rem D 1 ��- 12J651 K110406 12J60 w _ —' EP 13727 0 ~------ - "` ~ % ' 12J50 i --- 204 L 208 N 5 I2J55 \_ c'j 12J50 e 112J42 Z 4 203 i cr j 209 E n 32 6 72JJ,9 O 12T40 Q) 0 12JJ9 \ r 172JJ6 � cfl 210- cv 22 7 L j ! o ; i 420 ho 0_ 12JJO p1 I 202 i 12J29 N !-------- - i 72J77j 211 a �' A 21 0 8-------- - Rem 1 - 11J79 J 1ZJ20 i 1 12J1a i RP 12909 p s 9 12J71 12JTJ LMP 4403 P 80319 i 2 0 0.809 ha, h a NWS 301& v 2' 19 10 1.933 ha. t 11297 12J01 72J06 P 15�28 Rem Si/2 16 LMS 608 ;a 1.946 ho. 1 39057 7 8 9 10 10.1 I1? � c t t PP11 294 22 ----- -- 40---� �9 IaPP t 1 2 i e �*PPi - --- ----------------- ---------------------- � 123 AVE- 0.809 ho a 41 o o j 13 E 6 11 12275 1?286 P 16012 112.2� 15 14 223 2 72250 17551 �12255 h ------ � i W co 12256 N '� v 12257 N 123 AVE - BIZ?4p o - — ZONE P AMENDN'� n DGE .luw No. 6427-2006 No. ^ 369 RS— I (One �-amity Urban Res'dentia! RM— WnhoUse Reslde- nti'j -MAPLE RIDGE 1 :2500 em Lo"M CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 4, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/121/06 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6488-2007 21544 and 21550 DONOVAN AVENUE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) and RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to R-1 (Residential District), to permit the subdivision of two parcels into three equal lots with an area of 540.4 m'. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Bylaw No. 6488-2007 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. i) Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Romeo Dipietrantonio Owner: Santosh Virdi and Mohinder Mehat Legal Description: Lot 1 and 2, D.L. 247, Group 1, NWD, Plan: BCP15387 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Proposed: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Proposed: R-1 (Residential District) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation Urban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-1 (Residential District), RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 1621 m2 total (lot 1 = 971 m2 Donovan Avenue Full Urban SD/ 121 /06 lot 2 = 650m2) The subject property is located in an established residential area well within the urban boundary. The proposed R-1 (Residential District) zone is consistent with the land use designation and will permit the subdivision of two lots into three lots. Currently, lot 1 has an existing house on the property and lot 2 is used as a yard extension. If the rezoning is granted by Council, the removal of the existing house will be a condition of subdivision. c) Planning Analysis: Official Communitv Plan: The Official Community Plan aims "to manage residential growth through infill and intensification in a manner that respects neighbourhoods and the existing physical character of the surrounding areas" (Chapter 3, page 7). This application aids the objective to direct urban growth with the Urban Area boundary. Compatibility Criteria Neighbourhood Residential Infill is permitted in the OCP subject to compliance with the criteria found in Section 3-19. Infill development on a property is permitted subject to compliance with the following criteria: i) The infill development is on a property that is larger than the prevailing lot size of the surrounding neighbourhood The cumulative size of the subject properties is larger than the prevailing lot size in the surrounding neighbourhood. This application meets the criteria. -2- ii) the proposed lot area and widths should be not less than 80% of the lot area and width prescribed in the predominate or adjacent zoning in the surrounding neighbourhood: Although the adjacent zoning varies slightly, the predominant zones in this area are R-1 (Residential District) and RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). The minimum width for RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) is 15 metres and the R-1 (Residential District) zone minimum width is 12 metres; 12 is 80% of 15. A subdivision application has been received to create three equal lots with a lot area of 540.4 m2. This lot area is also not less than 80% of the prevailing lot size in the surrounding area. This application meets the criteria. iii) The proposed lot configuration is similar to the prevailing lot pattern that exists within the neighbourhood The proposed lot configuration will be identical to the lot pattern in the neighbourhood. This application meets this criterion. iv) The proposed housing form is consistent in scale and massing to that of the surrounding neighbourhood. The lot coverage for all residential zones in this area is, 40%. The proposed zoning is consistent with this single family residential neighbourhood and the housing form regulations in the R-1 (Residential District) are not dramatically different than the surrounding residential lots. This application meets this criterion. Zoning Bylaw: The proposed zone is R-1 (Residential District) and all proposed lots meet the bylaw requirements for this zone. Development Information Meeting: As the development proposal is less than 25 units a Development Information Meeting is not required. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: A review of servicing requirements by the Engineering Department indicates that urban services exist in this neighbourhood, and any additional servicing that may be required will be achieved as a condition of subdivision. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional 3 trees which is based on one tree per lot; final subdivision design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $75.00. -3- e) Intergovernmental Issues: Ministry of Transportation As the subject property is located within 800 metres of the Lougheed Highway, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6488 — 2007 will require the approval of the Minister of Transportation. CONCLUSION: The proposed development is in keeping with previous development which has taken place on this block and is consistent with the criteria outlined in the OCP for infill development. It is therefore recommended that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6488-2007 be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Prepared by: Jen Csikos t Plannig T clinician i pp ved;�: Jane 'ckerin ; -CP, MCIP Dir Planning Approved by: Frfank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng 1;�M: Public WoyAs & Development Services Concurrence: J. L. ( Chief JC/dp ve Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A — Subject Map Appendix B — Bylaw 6488-2007 Appendix C — Proposed subdivision plan -4- 16 cc\D, 17 cND 18 ccoo 19 20 170>AA \ r--O>N t-$N 0�� �2 4 u') O N N 21 01 2 \24 (N IN 2 23 P 6796C P 1215 P 72 07 P 72680 P 72%382 14�91,,,,-nd,x X P 8981 11939 15 I- B C , 1 2 A Lo �,- B 0) r- 2 P 8981 11929 c:) m 't Lo Lo (D Lo Lo m Lo Lo 16 Lo Lo C\l N N N CNI r-11 FSUBJECT PROPERTIES DONOVAN AVE. 0 CD U-) Lo CD N 0 CD co Nt It U-) CD Lo co U) 0 2 N 3 N 4 N cy) N c\j 23937 N IL 5 P 8981 1 2 REM BCP23935 BCP 15187 3 P 6077 6 20 19 18 17 16 cp cp cp 175 co 114 c T� 14 �RRINGTON PLACE 11890 AAB9,3 co 13 0 co T28 00 co 11892 11895 12 26 27 29 co 11 32--- _31 30 DiF,Ihcl of L I-' Pitt Mead.. Sitv r Valley Distdct of Albion` N Langley SCALE 1:1,000 w *', Moo i A 11887 EP 15205 11885 11881 P 607116 10 9 8 7 co m co u') to co 0) 0) Ir- Lo Lo U-) C\j T- — Lo 116 11875 11861 5 El 21550 & 21544 DONOVAN AVENUE CORPORATION OF i N THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAOLERIDGEPLANNING DEPARTMENT FDATE: Dec 7,2006 FILE:RZ/121/06 BY: P .4 jple-4d,� .6 BYLAW NO. 6488-2007 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6488-2007." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1, District Lot 247, Group I, Plan BCP15387, New Westminster District. And Lot 2, District Lot 247, Group 1, Plan BCP15387, New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1397 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R- I (Residential District) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of A.D. 2007. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of A.D. 2007. READ a second time the day of I A.D. 2007. READ a third time the day of A.D. 2007. APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of A.D. 2007. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of A.D. 2007 MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER 16 17 1 2q 1 �' N 'sue 24 12N �22 23 P 67960 P 12157 JP �� 07 I 68 P 7238 A B C 1 �2 I iA�� B4 1 2 IN N N � N �v DONOVAN AVE. EP 13421 P 8981 1193 15 P 8981 1192. 16 co N �i 2 5 BC _ 2_ 937% - 0- P 898 1 2 REM 1 u P 23935 C° P 1 38 3 P 8981 1 1189 � % _ __ ---- A 1188 21 �20�191817` 16 15 1 1 4 EP 15205 � 1g � 1188 P 11 Re P 11 Pr" N 191 lW1 EP ,HERRINGTON 60778 PACE �� 94 P 294491 115 6 11 11890 1 8g3 13 1187 11 _ I� 28 I PI 6 1 7 1186 2 1 27 11892 29 11895 12 1 101 1� 1 9 l 1 8 1 7 i 1 6 5 3 \\32 \\31 30 1 1 1� i� i� i� i� i� 4 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6488-2007 Map No. 1397 From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) 1 o: R-1 (Residential District) MAPLE RIDGE 1:1 ,250 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT A D.L.247 GP. 1 N.W.D. PLAN LMP14137 Scale 1:500 DONOVAN AVENUE 90'27'15' 12.67 12.67 12.67 FHou removed 5 1 2 1 n p b cNi 540.5 m2 540.4 m2 540.5 m2 o Rem.J 9 L. 247 CP 7 12.67 12.67 1 12.67 60776 16 15 Wade & Associates B.C. Land Surveyors Maple Ridge & Mission H2716 Phone 463-4753 114 Plan 29449 A!2OJqA�, B.C.L.S. �1-7morch 38,f217 CORPORATION OF THE Loom DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 7, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/119/06 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6481 - 2007 13080 240 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-2 One Family Suburban Residential and RS-3 One -Family Rural Residential to RS-lb One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential to permit a subdivision into 5 single family lots. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Bylaw No. 6481 - 2007 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following term(s) and condition(s) be met prior to final reading. i) Registration of a Rezoning Services Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement, which will include the trail construction; ii) Registration of a Section 219 Covenant for a Geotechnical Report that addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iii) Road dedication as required; iv) Park dedication as required. v) Removal of the existing buildings; vi) Discharge of the Cross Access Easement Agreements (Plan 66735 and Plan 58430) from the property title; DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: Pivotal Develoment Consultants Ltd. 0767322 BC Ltd. Lot 10, Section 27, Township 12, N WD Plan 2622 OCP: Zoning: Existing: Low Density Residential, Conservation Proposed: Low Density Residential, Conservation Existing: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Surrounding Uses North: Use: One Family Residential Zone: RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation Low Density Urban South: Use: One Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Low Density Urban, Medium Density Residential, and Conservation East: Use: One Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), Designation: Conservation West: Use: One Family Residential Zone: RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation Low Density Urban Existing Use of Property: One Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: One Family Residential Site Area: 2.012 HA Access: 240 Street Servicing: To be provided through a Rezoning Servicing Agreement and at Subdivision Companion Applications: SD/119/06, and DP/l 19/06 b) Project Description: Application RZ/119/06 proposes to rezone a portion of the property located at 13080 240 Street from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit the future subdivison into 5 lots, each having a lot size of not less than 557 m'. The future lots will front onto 240 Street between 130A Avenue and Shoesmith Avenue. The remainder of the property, approximately 75% of the site, will be dedicated as Park. The subject property is located in Silver Valley to the north of Horse Hamlet and is designated Low Density Residential and Conservation. Millionaire Creek crosses through the southeast corner and therefore, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit is required. -2- c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The plan of development is in compliance with the Silver Valley Area Plan of the Official Community Plan. Zoning Bvlaw: The proposed development complies with the Zoning Bylaw requirements. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property into 5 lots which meet the minimum lot width, lot depth and lot area requirements of the RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone. Subdivision Bvlaw: A review of the plans in relation to the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw has determined that the proposal complies with the bylaw. d) Development Permits: A Watercourse Protection Development Permit is required for the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment of Millionaire Creek, as identified on Schedule "C" of the Official Community Plan. This permit will also require compliance of the Natural Features Development Permit for the areas with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent. A Security will be taken as a condition of the issuance of the Development Permit to ensure that the Development Permit Area guidelines are met. e) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department reviewed the servicing for the development and provided their comments as follows: • The existing asphalt driveway and utility company plant on the proposed Park lot will need to be removed and the area replanted. • There are two easements on the property that provided access to properties beyond that must be cancelled as they are no longer necessary. • An equestrian trail is to be constructed through the Park lot to connect the existing trail on Shoesmith Crescent to the trail in the undeveloped 240 Street road allowance. The existing shoulder trail on 240 Street will be removed in front of the new subdivision. • The geotechnical setback line has been established by a geotechnical engineer and it is outside of the development area. • Road dedication is required on the south side of Shoesmith Crescent. • On -lot drainage detention facilities area required. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have determined that the equestrian trail currently located on the east shoulder of 240 Street between Shoesmith Crescent and 130A Avenues is to be relocated to a more suitable location at the rear of the proposed 5 lot subdivision within the Park -3- property. The geotechnical engineer has approved the location of the proposed trail at the top of the slope. The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the additional street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional 5 trees which is based on one tree per lot and final subdivision design will provide exact numbers. The required trees will be chosen to coordinate with the existing trees in the area. CONCLUSION: The density of the proposed RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone conforms to the Low Density Residential land use designation in the Silver Valley Area Plan and is consistent with the surrounding neighbourhood. It is therefore recommended that application RZ/119/06 be favourably considered and that Maple Ridge Zone Amendment Bylaw No. 6481-2007 (Appendix B) be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing. t Prepared by: Ann Edwards, CPT ning Technician C:: r" Appr d b ne P' er , MCP, MCIP ector of -Plan Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng / GM: Publi5rks &Development Services r Concurrence: J. . (Jim) Rule ief Administrative Officer AE/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A — Subject map Appendix B — Bylaw No. 6481-2007 -4- 38 19 18 ,�^�� ^� w 13185 13188 13191 9 12 0 ro 20 17 13186 13 13175 a 13175 13178 W 13181 8 14 36 21 m 16 13176 w 13165 P 2622 13165 13168 7 9418 35 13171 13166 U 15 22 15 6 03 13157 13155 13158 13161 16 m ARK 34 23 14 13/56 5 rn In t31a7 w 0 8 0� 13145 13148 13151 O 17 U 33 24 13 13146 4 13139 M w to 13135 13138 13141 13136 U 03 13129 18 0 13128 25 12 3 19 m 32 13131 13125 26 11 13126 20 2 13118 13121 21 13116 27 10 1 13108 1311' 13106 SUBJECT PROPERTY 28 9 13098 a0 13101 BCP 24 29 8 13088 13091 30 in 7 13078 13081 m 31 6 m 13068 13071 BCP 9418 13080 rn 1 N 2 3 4 m 5 w n 130 A AVE. Rem 23 A o 135 BCP 7889 PARK N I N I 112964 46 5 2 y 7 12 130 AVE. 22 12933 n' i 13080 240 STREET i .N �- CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF - - -� l IMAPLE RIDGE MAM_ JI E RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Dec 4, 2006 FILE: RZ/119/06 BY: PC BYLAW NO. 6481-2007 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6481-2007." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 10, Section 27, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 2622 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1392 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the READ a second time the READ a third time the day of day of day of RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the A.D. 200. A.D. 200. , A.D. 200. A.D. 200. day of , A.D. 200. 13178 u " 1 4 36 U i 16 13176 c� 13165 P 2622 13165 1316821— m cp 13171 m 7 0- 1 5 35 13166 U 13157 Co 13155 2 2 13158 15 13161 �13156 6 16 a 34 23 14 5 0 13147 8 13145 13148 U M 13151 13146 " N 17 33 24 � 13 4 Cl- 13139 13129 m 13135 13138 _ 13141 13136 U 18 1312825— � 12�,131 3 19 2.023 ha. 32 13126 - 13125 2 6 11 2 20 Q- 13118 13121 21 rl-) co a w A v J— Ln 0 10 � 131161 �` 13708 27 � 13111 � ��� 13106 ��° PARK 00 2 8 C° 9 73098 d 13707 B C P 24019 29 � �0 8 13088 13091 v � U 30 m l 7 13078 m 13081 31 6 m 73068 13071 13080 N BC 1941 1 2 —3I 4� 5 130 A AVE. BCP 7889 PARK 0.920 ha cn cn 0 cv 12954 I[7 2.023 ha. c~n PI 2.023 ha. 0 v -----� RW 58430 130 AVE. MAP! E RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6481 —2007 Map No. 1392 From: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) i o: RS-1 b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) CAW Lwsmwt��..� MAPLE RIDGE 1 :2000 ek, CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 5, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/090/06 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6483-2007 23267 SILVER VALLEY RD, 13750 232 STREET EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), RS-lb (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential), and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6483-2007 be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii) A Statutory Right of Way plan and agreement must be registered at the Land Title Office in support of servicing; iii) Road dedication as required; iv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking on the RM-1 townhouse site. I�`ZKII.Y.`KW1 a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: Damax Consultants David Laird Nag Construction Co Ltd Lot: 12 Except: Parcel "A" (explanatory PIan 23408), Section: 33, Township: 12, NWD, Plan: 19849 Parcel "A" (explanatory Plan 23408) Lot 12, Section 33, Township 12, NWD, Plan 19849 OCP: Existing: Medium / High Density Residential, Open Space Proposed: Medium / High Density Residential, Open Space Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) Surrounding Uses North: South East West: Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low Density Urban, Low/Medium Density Residential, Open Space Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Medium Density Residential, Med/High Density Residential, Commercial, Conservation, Low Density Urban Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation Residential CD-3-98 (Comprehensive Development), A-2 (Upland Agriculture Eco-Clusters, Medium Density Residential Vacant Multi -Family Residential Proposed 232A Street, Full Urban Rezoning, Subdivision, Development Variance Together, the subject properties are approximately 2.5 hectares in size. The streets fronting the subject properties, 232 Street and Silver Valley Road, will be widened and constructed to a Silver Valley Arterial road standard. An additional road, 232A Street, will be constructed dividing the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) sites from the RS-lb (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) site and will also provide access to future development to the north. A "greenway", to be dedicated as park in the subdivision stage, is planned to create connectivity between 232 Street at the northern portion of the townhouse development to the newly constructed 232A Street. This greenway also provides a visual buffer between the multi -family townhouse site and the proposed single family RS-1 lots (One Family Urban Residential). According to the OCP, the greenbelt is slated to connect northward and connect greenspace to future development to the north. The site will be zoned; RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone. i) RS-1 (One Farnily Urban Residential) zone: The area north of the proposed greenway on the west side of the newly created 232A Street be -2- rezoned to permit the subdivision into 3 lots no smaller than 668m' in area. ii) RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone: The proposal is for 18 RS-lb lots not less than 557m'. These lots will be located on the east side of the newly constructed 232A Street and fronting onto Silver Valley Road. iii) RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone: The development concept calls for 31 townhouse units on the west portion of the site. Access to this area will be from the newly constructed 232A Street to an internal road maintained by the strata. The townhouse site is subject to a Multi -Family Residential Development Permit to ensure the resulting development will adhere to the form and character guidelines outlined in the Official Community Plan. Council will have an opportunity to review the townhouse layout and design at a future meeting when the development permit is presented. c) Planning Analysis: Official Communitv Plan: The development site is within the Silver Valley Area Plan which forms part of the Official Community Plan and together the two properties have multiple designations: Medium/High Density Residential, Open Space, Low Density Urban Residential, and Low/Medium Urban Residential. In the case of this development, the Medium/High Density Residential designation is met with the proposed RM-1 Townhouse District zone. The Open Space designation is met with the proposed greenway to be dedicated as park with the subdivision application. The Low Density Urban Residential will be provided though the RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone. Lastly, the Low/Medium Urban Residential designation is being incorporated through the RS-lb (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) zone. This development is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. ZoninI4 Bylaw: The zone amending bylaw is for the three separate zones. The rezoning proposal calls for two separate zones with a single family use: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) with a minimum lot area of 668m' and the slightly denser RS-lb (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) with a minimum lot area of 557m'. All the single family lots will meet the bylaw requirements for their allotted zone. The rezoning proposal also requests a portion of the site be rezoned to a multi -family zone, RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). This development will be applying for one variance of the zoning bylaw. The proposal included the intent to vary the front yard setback from the required 7.5 metres to the 4.5 meters proposed for the townhouses from western property lines fronting 232°d Street. This request will be formalized for Council's consideration when the Development Permit and Variance Permit application is presented for consideration. Development Permits: The townhouse portion of this site is subject to the Development Permit Guidelines for Multi -Family development as outlined in the 2006 Official Community Plan. - 3 - Advisory Design Panel: This application was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel at their June 12, 2007 meeting. The Panel was supportive of the project as presented and make the following resolution; The Advisory Design Panel has reviewed the proposal and supports the general concept and commends the applicant on the quality of presentation and supporting documents. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was held on January 8, 2007 at the Yennadon Elementary School. Approximately 15-20 local residents and interested parties attended the meeting, 6 of whom filled out comments sheets. It is important to note that the road pattern has changed since the time of this meeting to meet Engineering requirements, specifically, a roundabout is no longer proposed for this development. The Development Information Meeting summary provided by the applicant is attached as Appendix H. The concerns expressed were: • The preservation of trees on site The townhouse proposal calls for many trees on site and a landscape plan will come before Council as a part of the Development Permit application. A pending arborist report will conclude if any existing trees have the potential to stay on the property along with mitigation recommendations for their retention. This report will also include requirements for hazard tree assessment/ removal and potential replanting opportunities. • Road upgrades and accessibility for trucks The applicant is currently working with the Engineering Department to ensure that all roads will be built to the municipal standard for this area. • Traffic generation and parking needs. Both Silver Valley Road and the lower half of 232A Street will have parking lanes to accommodate on -street parking. The townhouse site proposal meets all bylaw requirements for resident and visitor parking. d) Interdepartmental Implications: EnLyineerin2 Department: The Engineering Department has identified that all of the services required in support of the rezoning do not exist to the site. It will, therefore, be necessary for the applicant to enter into a Rezoning Development Agreement and post the required security to complete the necessary works prior to final reading. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional 22 trees which is based on one tree per lot; final subdivision design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of 525.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $550.00. -4- CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. It is recommended that First Reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw 6483-2007 and the application be forwarded to Public Hearing. Prepared by: ' �Jen Csikos TlanniOTe nician ,Approved � Pi ng, CIP �../ Dir for o anning- Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works &-Beve Services Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer JC/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A — Subject Property Map Appendix B — Bylaw 6483 — 2007 Appendix C — OCP Designation Map Appendix D — Subdivision Concept Plan Appendix E — Site Plan Townhouse Site Appendix F — Concept Elevations Appendix G — Townhouse Streetscape sections Appendix H — Development Information Meeting Summary - 5 - I 25 K 13673/91 P Distnct of L Pitt Meadows iLl Distnct of Langley SCALE 1:2,500 13920 13910 EP 28084 A F11 INT # 34267 SILVER VALLEY ROAD Rem 1 2 P 2 132 13738 8 PP162 13702 P 2409 Rem 3 N 200'9 13897 L119263 13872 13868 3 P 20132 P 20132 4 P 13776 1 P 2409 2 J 13750 232 Street & 23267 Silver Valley Road fin: i i CORPORATION OF I o = THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE ion - —{ t .�..+�- PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Jun 4, 2007 FILE: RZ/090/06 BY: JC Rivers--=-- A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6483-2007." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 12 Except: Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 23408), Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 19849 and Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 23408), Lot 12, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 19849 and outlined in heavy black line are hereby rezoned as shown on Map No.1394 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the READ a second time the READ a third time the day of day of day of RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the A.D. 2007. A.D. 2007. , A.D. 2007. A.D. 2007. day of , A.D. 2007 M/\PI.-F RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6483-2007 Map No. 1394 From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) To: RS—I(One Family Urban Residential) FM RM—I(Townhouse Residential) RS—lb(One Family Urban(medium density) Resid entic 1) MAPLE RIDGE 1:2500 CONS ly � _ RLOW OPE SP 138" 131572 FUBJECT PROPERTIES s qUBJECT ]PROrPERTIES /1' 13819 Ecktt- Opp ME RLOW Civ r 0 W Legend 13750 232 STREET & wh 23267 SILVER VALLEY ROAD CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF CL ------MAPLE RIDGE MILE RILL DATE Dec 5.2006 F!Lt I,_)P,'W)(Ji06 BY: PC it IS fix, •�'�-� 141 �• +ors,_ _� � 9 t a soil niin : �� i•�i� ia+��� 2C � axe - ' �/ � 0� ..— ,.. mm'a,L���elae�st�,'�tf�ss�ols�Chr�'. ,. �� �r�,o � ` ��-"_�,.�`►��`_... �...: �=. '�: �.....,�'!�� �=aaaai�as�a�c��a'e ` �` � � 'A tee► oeoa ,k9llVA H3AIIS F- w w C( F- CO Z P CA z Q z IL Q Z UJ a a o p w J N U) z mw T— z z� z¢- pu.o u� o>m a�< 0 z F- w w N N yy9 F � � F t$ 4-J n f N QJ v� x a K Q�v Q W � J W LM W J J Q U, w J CO Aft W F- V) N m N \l (1 Cr � t I' AWefdl-)( F 0 z Z z +O oUJ Q J _5aw ,CVO COs "K mO. W CL v a� o . c +-J,. O��LK kp 4 A Lm } w J Q > W J gg_ 5 _¢ tq U w cr, N CO 1 4 ffendiX 07 V) - Z. W M o< 1-0 C� w LLJ U) U) w w w cc 4-J co co CD C a) a) C\l Cl) C\j CD 4-J 0 C5 55 I�d X., " 7ttJ W) IE CL ui ILI, cz C) IL W; cn LM LLI O > > U i 2 U) Lo 2 a) -a U, uj U) rn cli RZ - 009-06 23267 Silver Valley Road and 13750 - 232 Street Minutes of the public information meeting held at Yennadon Elementary School at 23347 - 128t" Avenue on January 8, 2007 from 5:30 pm to 7:30 pm - David Laird of Damax Consultants Ltd. - Brian Shigetomi of Atelier Pacific Architects - Navi Sivia, NAI Construction Ltd. - Approximately 15-20 local residents and interested parties ON DISPLAY An overall view of the site showing the 31 unit townhouse site on 232nd Street & single family development off the internal road & lots fronting on Silver Valley Road to the east. (Reduced copy attached). - The Silver Valley O.C.P. plan highlighting the site. - Several displays by the architects, Atelier Pacific Architects, showing details of the townhouse site. (Reduced copies attached). Prior to the meeting copies of the plans were e-mailed to Gavin McLeod of the Silver Valley Neighbourhood Advisory Group. Mr. McLeod attended the meeting. In general, the reaction to the proposal was positive. (See attached comment sheets) The major concerns were for the present increased traffic south of the site on 232 Street heading towards 132 Ave. Cars and trucks are speeding down the hill. Within the vicinity of the development, the proposed roundabout at Silver Valley Road and 232 Street to save the rock out crop was well accepted. The roundabout must be large enough for commercial vehicles, trucks and buses (David Laird said that a roundabout was also being considered by the District at the intersection of Fern Crescent & 232nd Street). Concern was raised to save the majority of the evergreen trees at Silver Valley Road and 232nd Street intersection. The townhouse proposal allows for this. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 7, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: DP/DVP/086/06 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Development Permit and Development Variance Permit 22141 119 AVE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant, Mr. Derek Crawford is proposing the construction of "Maple Ridge Senior's Village" a seniors' residential complex with 108 licensed care beds and 81 assisted living apartments. This development is proposed to provide 2 levels of care: • Level One: for seniors who need only minimal assistance in their daily lives • Level Two: for seniors who need more intermediate care 24 hours a day, provided by an on -site skilled nursing staff. This project is a partnership between the developer and Fraser Health. The application is subject to Multi -Family Development Permit Guidelines as outlined in the 2006 Official Community Plan. The applicant is seeking variances as described in the report. That the Manager of Legislative Services be authorized to notify qualifying property owners that approval of DVP/086/06 respecting properties located at 22141 119 Avenue will be considered by Council at the July 10, 2007 Council meeting; and further That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/086/06 respecting property located at 22141 119 Avenue subject to approval of DVP/086/06. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Derek Crawford Architect Inc. Owner: Maple Ridge Seniors Village Holdings Ltd Legal Description: Lot A, D.L. 397, Group 1, NWD Plan BCP 28220 OCP: Existing: Residential Proposed: Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: CD- 1-00 (Comprehensive Development) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation East: Use: Zone: Designation West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: Multi -Family Residential RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment) and RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential District) Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-I (Single Family Residential) Urban Residential Multi -Family Residential RM-3 (High Density Apartment) Urban Residential Townhouse Complex RM-5 (Garden Apartments) Urban Residential Single Family Residential Seniors' Residential Care and Assisted Living Complex 0.78 HA or 7,835 m2 119`h Avenue and laneway at east end of site Full Urban RZ/ 086/06 and DVP/086/06 The subject site is 0.78 HA (7835 m2) located on 119'h Avenue at the edge of the Town Centre commercial core, one block away from a bus route and two blocks away from the Civic Centre. Site access is off of 1 19`" Avenue and a lane on the east edge of the property line. The total proposed gross building area is 16,249 square meters (175,000 square feet). The building design is proposed as a combination of three and four storey structures. The proposed building includes amenities on site like a full -service dining room, library, lounge, hairdressing, spa, theatre and other activity spaces. Outdoor on - site amenities include a west facing terrace and a secured courtyard, a secured courtyard on the north, a gazebo and a large north -facing landscaped garden area for walking and sitting, and two rooftop terraces — a larger one facing south and a smaller one facing southwest. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The 2006 Official Community Plan designates the subject site for residential use and the proposed development is subject to Multi -Family Development Permit Guidelines. Multi -Family Development Permit Guidelines: ■ New development into established areas should respect private spaces and incorporate local neighborhood elements in building form, height, architectural features and massing. The proposed senior's use apartment building is residential in character. The building massing, form and character is planned to reflect a residential scale suitable to the site. The Porte Cohere forms the central welcoming architectural feature and selection of fagade treatment like cultured stone as seen on South Elevation (Appendix B), painted hardi-board siding, aluminum sun control -2- device, wood facia and sand -blasted finishes have been chosen to reflect the type of materials that are used in the residential surroundings. The height is three and four -storeys which fits well with the multi -family residential development on all sides except on the south where older, single family development exists. ■ Transitional development should be used to bridge areas of low and high densities, through means such as stepped building heights, or low rise ground oriented housing located to the periphery of a higher density developments. The proposed floor space ratio of 1.64 is well within the floor space ratio allowed in the CD- 1-00 zone (which is 1.8). The proposed H-shaped building is three storeys on the north and four storeys along 119'h Avenue to the south. Most of the peripheral buildings are multi -family and 2 to 8 storeys high so this proposal fits well in the context. The existing older single family houses on the south are expected to change to higher densities to match with the changing surrounding multi -family development. ■ Large scale development should be clustered and given architectural separation to foster a sense of community and improve visual attractiveness. The proposed "H-shaped building" is designed so as to give maximum external fagade to most of the rooms, thus promoting good natural light and ventilation into the rooms. The inward looking form of the building also gives an opportunity to the residents to communicate with each other, thus encouraging a sense of community within the residents. The architectural style shows a well - articulated modern design with fagade treatment like cultured stone and the Porte Cohere forms the central welcoming architectural feature thus adding to the visual aesthetics. ■ Pedestrian circulation should be encouraged with attractive streetscapes attained through landscaping, architectural details, appropriate lighting and by directing parking underground where possible or away from Public view through screened parking structures or surface parking located to the rear of the property. All resident parking and staff parking is provided underground with an intension of encouraging pedestrian activity on ground. Although 119"' Avenue will serve as the principle access, an existing lane at the east end of the property line will serve as a pedestrian and emergency access. The various secured courtyards along the northeast and northwest corners for the care facility and the secured courtyard on the west located within the central portion of the H-shaped building provide for comfortable pedestrian activity areas. They include features such as a 3.0 in wide paved walkways, Gazebo with Trellis and benches for outdoor seating. Maple Ridte Town Centre Concept Plan The Town Centre Concept Plan shows a multi -family designation for the subject site. The plan encourages a range of housing choices in the core area to: • Help increase the population base to support local businesses and transit, thus making the Town Centre attractive & vibrant. • To increase public safety in relatively complete communities like the Town Centre that allows residents to live, work, play and shop. -3- The provision of a broad range of housing types & transportation choices will help to accommodate people at various stages of life, reduce automobile use and air pollution. It helps residents who cannot drive (especially seniors with disabilities) to access daily activities on their own, within walking distance Green Building Design The project architect has submitted a green building rating system checklist for the proposed development, as required for all sites located within the Regional Town Centre (see attached) and can achieve a total of 28 points, which is the equivalent of a certified LEEDS building (note: the applicant is not intending to certify the building). However, a LEED Restrictive Covenant will be registered on title to ensure that the proposed green building components are achieved. Zoning Bylaw: The proposed CD- 1-00 (Comprehensive Development) zone is intended for senior's residential use and also permits a licensed private hospital use. Accessory Congregate Care Use is for the benefit of the residents only. A density of maximum 1.8 Floor Space Ratio is permitted in this zone and the applicant is proposing a Floor Space Ratio of 1.64. Proposed Variances to Zonink Bylaw: The applicant is requesting variances for the following: ■ A zero setback for the Porte Cohere facing 1 19`h Avenue. This provides covered access to the main entry for residents and visitors for drop-off (Appendix B) ■ The central feature proposed for visual aesthetics (facing 119`h Avenue) requires a 2.2m variance in roof height. This provides a strong central architectural element which breaks the monotonous profile of the roof thus creating a visual focal point of interest and more importantly provides shelter over an outdoor room for the roof garden (Appendix B, South Elevation) ■ Reduce setback to 6.Om for sun shades over windows on south elevation. These provide shade for the amenity areas on the south side of the building on the main level for people relaxing in the secure courtyard area at the front of the building. ■ Two adjacent roofs to the above central fagade will require a 0.2m variance, as they are "stepped down" to the main roof height. ■ The east and west stair structures require a 0.2m variance to provide head room for roof garden access. ■ A variance of 1.5 m to retain the 6.0 m Lane on the east which is supported by the Engineering Department. ■ Small parking stalls: The maximum permitted number of small parking stall spaces under the Parking Bylaw is 9 spaces and the applicant is requesting to increase that number to 18 small car spaces. The ND Lea report recommends that the maximum number of small car parking spaces be 30% of the total required spaces and based on their above noted recommendation for total number of stalls. This would permit a total of 20 small car stalls and the applicant has proposed 18 spaces. Advisory Design panel: The proposed project was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel on October 10, 2006. The design panel was in general supportive of the project and no specific objections were noted. -4- d) Intergovernmental Issues: The Planning Department received the certified copy of Maple Ridge Bylaw No.6443-2006 from the Ministry of Transportation on May 4, 2007. e) Financial Implications: As per a Council resolution passed on September 10, 1990, there will be a bonding for 2.5 % of the estimated total construction cost of the project as Landscape Security, to be paid at the Development Permit stage. This security is also intended to ensure the form and character aspect of the development permit along with the proposed landscaping works. The project architect has provided us with an approximate estimate of the total project cost and the applicant has paid the required landscape security. CONCLUSION: The proposed project is centrally located in the Regional Town Centre with respect to many public transport choices, services and amenities. The building is well -designed with an appealing exterior facade, ample outdoor amenity space located on the ground and on the roof, and additionally with supportive indoor amenities on site. There will be variances required to accommodate the development as outlined in the report. Prepared by: Rasika Ac Plat ne II Approved by: Jane ickering, , MCIP Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng / GM: Public Works & De v opm t Services Concurrence: RA/dp J. L. Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A: Subject Map Appendix B: Architectural Plans Appendix C: Landscape Plans -5- 7 _... 12050 66 ., 1612053 .- rr- 10 '' 811zos1 106 M _._ J I _ - H G _T �__._-_—....__ �—/ P 20 �3 0) P 15319 12050 0_ 12060 - N 12061 12047 N o- 80zo53 d 107 N N CHURCH AVE. 7 12046 N 67 a A U) 1 g 12046 lzoaa 12048 LMP 8411 oa�ff 1n 12041 2 lzoaz 8 79 108 P 41 12042 68 Q _1I '.. v ti 72040 U7 12041 12032 4 a, 10 12038 E L O 12029 E12035 t 12034 69 ° 3 7° 78 109 P 14898 a 3 7 ° zoz6 12037 M 12026 20 C zoze P 20094 4 r141 P 14571 P 1 571 0 P 669 12025 r 279 0 142 '- 4 5 6 ° 110 D n A� 0 2 1 rn zols 9 0 278 a Rem 43 65 11965 1 161 P 1 113 P8 28 11993 11970 11973 6 12 1963 5 11 11962 11953 4 10 11952 N 11943 3 00 9 11942 Q 0 2 M 611945 11932 1 v o � a 7 H in N N 119 AVE. 56 55 54 53 52 51 P 4049 11887 P 11251 22 21 20 19 18 17 11875 SELKIRK AVE. 11 12 13 14 15 16 P 1251 11851 P 1251 (P 11251) cNv 6 5 4 3 B District of Pitt Meadows i_ t1YD�,p Haneyy,-,�- (ij District of Langley SCALE 1:2,500 DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. N 50 49 48 47 46 N 45 N 1 N 2 N 68 P 14049 P 61550 11888 C, 11901 — U) P 11251 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 69 11868 17867 Rem Rem Rem ? Rem 40 N 39 N 38 N 37 242 11850 P 11251 P 62478 11841 A P 67821 River Th—hill W 112 E 112 A., coE E P 70168 E N P 632 NWS 2870 w 17980 Pcl. P 6� N 79 NWS 418 N P 36157 P 4 11960 6 P 8148 5 P 8148 11926 H N N N H P 16304 P 81 8 (P 8380) �83 4 3 2 1 A of A 11916 � 5 3 P 78577 N NWS 2948 P 808 uyva 1 A NWS 2762 NWS 2611 (P 6808) P 76483 P 74121 22 21 20 19 P 6803 61 P 58011 EA " 1 29 30 31 22139/49/57/68/75 * AVENUE & • PLAN34526 CORPORATION OF RIDGETHE DISTRICT OF MAPLE N1"LEjZj1[)U PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Sep 13, 2006 FILE: RZ/086/06 BY: PC 0 lig, tl Old x EE tq 5 IL it 2C 29 Q lk x 0 0 O_____— ---. Lei p 0-------- a-M, 1 �r 1 2 oilro clE E too �1$8�8818�8 �8��$�81'$881�381$SJE 8S8' arm r`a �`✓��Ik rl�n �— - �� 77 I xlx t1 11 {2 E j 1 witty � tEE wi� �$' IIE$ I�w�"I�E r E ,.1 I �w.�� I v I i _ � I i i " e E 1: all 1 8 E E E .I I` milli! I I '��� , II E 'x� �,- r� � v 1 8 _ E } J IBIS E E WAL it 1 4-pnoll)( c --Ar -- Iva., . ..... ..... ... ta la cJ i i T y1� CY i s ell Lo"Ut on CORPORATION OF THE MAPLE RIDGE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 8, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: VP/021/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Cow SUBJECT: Variance Permit 21751 136 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This report addresses an application for a development variance permit to vary servicing required under a building permit application. The variance is to reduce the amount of frontage being serviced to relate to the conditions on the ground. RECOMMENDATION: That the Manager of Legislative Services be authorized to notify qualifying property owners that approval of DVP/021/07 respecting property located at 21751 136 Avenue will be considered by Council at the July 10, 2007 meeting. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: ABM Engineering Services, Mr A B Mikes Owner: Jarnail S Biln Jaspal K Biln Balwant S Biln Legal Description: Zoning: Lot: 2, Section: 31, Township: 12, Plan: 22684 Existing: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Surrounding Uses: The lands are surrounded by lands within the Agricultural Land Reserve and Zoned A-2 (Upland Agricultural). Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property Access: Requested Variance: Single Family Residential and Agricultural Use No change 136 Avenue to vary servicing requirements along property frontage b) Project Description: The applicants applied for a building permit in 2004 for a 167 mz (1800 sq. ft.) building to support their farming operation. Under the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 4800-1993 the undeveloped road allowance adjacent to the site was required to be improved by constructing a (rural local) paved road across the full frontage of the property. The applicants felt at that time that the servicing of the entire road frontage was not necessary as the portion east of Cedar Way was not required for access to any lands. At that time, a variance permit was suggested to reduce the frontage being serviced, however the applicants were under a time constraint to get the building constructed. They therefore bonded for all the servicing works but have not yet constructed them. The building has been completed and final approval by the Building Department is in place. An application for a development variance permit has now been submitted to vary the servicing requirements under the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw. The variance proposed is to reduce the frontage of the property being serviced from the full frontage of the property to just that frontage from the west property line of the subject lands to Cedar Way. To the east of Cedar Way the road allowance would be left unimproved as it is not required to provide access to these lands or the lands to the east. c) Planning Analysis: The lands lie within the Agricultural Land Reserve and within the Green Zone as defined in the Official Community Plan (OCP). In addition, the lands are designated Agricultural on Schedule B to the OCP. The intent therefore is for continued use of the lands for agricultural purposes. This application would be consistent with that intent in that the road construction would be only what is necessary to provide suitable access for farm purposes and the road standard would be rural in nature. d) Interdepartmental Implications: This application has been reviewed by the Engineering, Fire, and Parks & Leisure Services Departments. They have commented as follows: Engineering Department The Engineering Department supports this application and notes that a servicing design will have to be prepared by the applicant's engineer. The design will be for a seven metre wide paved rural road with gravel shoulders and providing for a short stub to allow vehicles to turn around at the end of Cedar Way. They also note the requirement to ensure continued use of the existing equestrian trail along 136 Avenue. The suggested configuration is shown on the attached preliminary plan. Parks and Leisure Services Parks and Leisure Services have raised no objection to the application, subject to the road design providing for two metre wide shoulders on each side to accommodate the existing equestrian trail use. The Engineering Department will see this is incorporated into the design. Fire Department The Fire Department have requested that the driveway entrance to the subject site at the property line be widened to a minimum six metres to allow room for vehicles and a hydrant hose. This will be incorporated into the design. -2- e) Alternatives: If this variance were not approved the applicant would be expected to carry out the required construction of the full frontage of the property as agreed upon and bonded for. CONCLUSION: This application is consistent with OCP policy for these lands and supported by staff. It is recommended that Council approve issuance of this Development Variance Permit. dawl;zv��� p(A Prepared by: n McLaren ` ` flan g Technician Approved fiy:� J e Picke MCP, MCIP DtQr of Planning Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GNJ.:xPublic Worms & Development Services Concurrence: J KM/dp lim) Rule Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Sketch plan of road construction -3- ,QPtend;x A District of At Pitt Meadows r Han District of Langley SCALE 1:7,500 Subject Property Sliver Valley i , 21751-136 Ave r;-" G� o CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF Albion , . . � MAPLE RIDGE 1 , " f / -I- -----.- PLANNING DEPARTMENT - (; DATE: Mar 29, 2007 VP/021/07 BY: JV ! �1 River �fpe,nd;k .8 E C:D C) U) LLj n 0 w cr ck� UJ CD UJ Lu m u uj 0) Of fill OR CD W ----------------- ul ------------- l fill ),VM'1A18G — — — — — — — — — — 7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — fluil.1.1 MY - 1, ui CD z 2) <C) 0 00 x V) U, UJ z L'i IL V, < L Lo CL Z Z) cr C, CL 1-- 1A V) ui >- < CL z 6 NOf - 0 V) F— x LAJ C) (n < m m I HXIG d330 iSIX3 ME OEM N - t- T co Co E X N N < E E 7' 0 E Ln < C) yQ C) j < cn V) m CORPORATION OF THE /i DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 11, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: AL/038/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Application for Homesite Severance (Subdivision) of Land within the Agricultural Land Reserve EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received under Section 21 (2) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act to subdivide approximately 1.2 hectares (3 acres) of land that is within the Agricultural Land Reserve. The applicant qualifies under Policy 11 of the Agricultural Land Commission Act for Homesite Severance. This policy provides for "aging in place" for long term residents in the Agricultural Land Reserve, by allowing the subdivision of smaller parcels for rural residential purposes while retaining larger land parcels for agricultural purposes. RECOMMENDATION: That Application AL/038/07 be authorized to proceed to the Agricultural Land Commission; DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Sharon Stewart Owner: Richard B Trethewey Legal Description: Lot: 1, Section: 25, Township: 9, Plan: 38879 Am Existing: Agricultural Proposed: No Change Zoning: Existing: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Farm Zone: A-2 Upland Agriculture Designation Agriculture, 100% within the Agricultural Land Reserve South: Use: 5 properties, 2 have farm use, 3 are rural residential Zone: A-2 Upland Agriculture Designation: Agriculture, 100% within the Agricultural Land Reserve. East: Use: Rural residential Zone: A-2 Upland Agriculture Designation: Agriculture, 100% within the Agricultural Land Reserve. West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: b) Project Description: Park A-2 Upland Agriculture Park in the Agricultural Land Reserve. Farm Rural Residential and Farm 17.349 HA 216 Street The property is part of a long running family farm. The property owner has owned the property since before the creation of the Agricultural Land Reserve. He wishes to subdivide off his homesite parcel for residential and retirement purposes, while allowing most of the parcel to be acquired by an adjacent existing farm operation. An application under these circumstances may meet the conditions of homesite severance by the Agricultural Land Commission. c) Planning Analysis: Two policies of the Official Community Plan are of particular relevance to this application. The following except from Policy 6-12 of the Official Community Plan states that: Maple Ridge will protect the productivity of its agricultural land by:... d) discouraging the subdivision of agricultural land into smaller parcels, except where positive benefits to agriculture can be demonstrated; This application demonstrates a net benefit to agriculture by retaining most of the subject property in active farming. The prospective purchaser of the proposed remainder portion has farm status according to BC Assessment and runs a long standing farming operation. It is anticipated that this proposal will assist in ensuring the continued agricultural use of the larger portion of the subject property in perpetuity. Policy 6-9 of the Official Community Plan relates more specifically to the Provincial Policy Framework supporting agriculture. It states: Maple Ridge supports the policies and regulations of the Agricultural Land Commission Act and the Farm Practices Protection Act in its land uses and will review its bylaws affecting farmland and farm operations for consistency with these provincial acts, regulations, and guidelines. This application may be viewed as a unique case that meets specific policy guidelines of the Agricultural Land Commission and assists in retaining the larger portion of the subject property in active production. Homesite severance provisions provide retiring farmers with aging in place opportunities while minimizing the parcelization of farm properties. The following homesite severance guidelines pertain to this application: 1. Only one application per property, and the owner must provide evidence of continuous occupation since December 21, 1972; 2. Previous subdivisions on the subject property may by considered by the Commission to have fulfilled the objectives of the Homesite Severance Policy and further applications may be denied on this basis; -2- 3. The applicant must provide evidence showing a legitimate intention to sell the remainder of the property upon the approval of the "homesite severance" application. Acceptable evidence includes an interim agreement for sale, a prospective buyer's written statement of intent to purchase, or a real estate listing; 4. The existing homesite may be created as a separate parcel where it is of a minimum size compatible with the character of the property but is exempt from having to meet minimum parcel size under its zoning; 5. The remainder of the subject property after the homesite severance must be of a size and configuration that will, in the Commission's opinion, either constitute a suitable agricultural parcel, or be consolidated with adjacent farm property, or have a "no build" covenant registered on it prohibiting residential buildings; 6. On approving a "homesite severance", the Commission will require that the homesite is not to be resold for five years except in the case of estate settlements. The owner must provide the Commission with a contractual commitment to this effect; and 7. Approved "homesite severance" applications qualify under Section 946 of the Local Government Act insofar as compliance with local bylaws is concerned. This legislation relaxes the minimum parcel size for qualifying properties that are within the Agricultural Land Reserve. The submitted application complies with these guidelines of the Agricultural Land Commission. The owner has resided on the property since before the creation of the Agricultural Land Reserve. The remainder, should this application be successful, will be approximately 15.8 hectares (39 acres). For this remainder, a notarized intent to purchase agreement from the adjacent farm property has been included as part of the application. Additional Considerations. If this application is successful, a municipal subdivision application will be required in order to complete this development proposal. Prior to approval, the applicant would have to demonstrate compliance with well and septic disposal for both properties. In addition, watercourse protection is required. The District's usual practice for protecting watercourses in rural areas is through restrictive covenants. It is understood that the Agricultural Land Commission must approve all covenants registered against land that is within the Agricultural Land Reserve prior to the completion of subdivision plans. d) Alternatives: As with all applications by property owner to the Agricultural Land Commission, Council has the option to deny forwarding this application, in which case the application will be considered, denied and closed. CONCLUSION: This application for subdivision with the Agricultural Land Reserve complies with the conditions for homesite severance, which provides long term farm operators with the opportunity to retire while still remaining in their homes. For this reason, this application should be viewed in a different light than other applications for subdivision within the Agricultural Land Reserve, which are discouraged by the policies of the Official Community Plan. -3- The recommendation is to allow this application to proceed to the Agricultural Land Commission, with the understanding that should this application be successful, the application will have to comply with municipal requirements for subdivision. Prepared by: Diana Hall Approved y�Janej'iek�CP, MCIP Direc r of Planning Approved by: rank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng GM: Public Works & Devel Concurrence: J. L. (Jiq Rule Chief A inistrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Schedule A: Subject Map Schedule B: Subdivision Proposal Submitted by Applicant -4- i p Schedule A: Subject Map SUBJECT PROPERTY i I I SCALE 1:6,000 District of Pitt Meadows __- - Silver VaWy , e o Haney -1-� � T District of Albion ie Langley �(`\\�\\\ --s- _— Rues 13181 216 STREET CORPORATION OF ,# THE DISTRICT OF . •MAPLE RIDGE : PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: May 8, 2007 FILE: AL/038/07 BY: PC Schedule B: Subdivision Proposal Submitted by Applicant LET i , � 61 a-r- L-- Deep Roots Greater Heights 1W I ' • SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Canada Day Event EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DATE: June 7, 2007 FILE NO: E01-035-001.5 ATTN: C of W A request has been received from Maple Ridge Parks and Leisure Services to use municipal streets for their annual Canada Day Event on Sunda} July 1, 2007, from 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM. A cope of the request is attached. Authorization from Council is required in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Flighway and Traffic By-law 3136-1982" to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge. RECOMMENDATION: THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the annual Canada Day Event on Sundav Julv 1, 2007, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule `A' attached to the staff report dated June 7, 2007 are met. DISCUSSION: (a) Background Context: From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability- for injury or damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as Schedule "A". The Canada Day festivities are scheduled from 8:00 Ail to 4:00 PM in Memorial Peace Park and will require the following road closures: • 1-laney Place Road surrounding Memorial Peace Park; • McIntosh Avenue from Fraser Street to 224 Street; and • Fraser Street from i'vlclntosh _Avenue to Dewdney Trunk Road. Barricades will be set up by the organizers to manage this closure (b) Strategic Plan: Permitting of Maple Ridge street events allows the District to manage road infrastructure and associated risks but pet allows events that promote community development and highlight Maple Ridge's natural and built features. (c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Permission to use municipal streets may cause some minor delays and inconveniences to other road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the organizers. In addition, the organizers will be distributing an information letter to affected businesses and residents. (d) Governmental Implications: The road use permit establishes that the festival organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP, for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service) for any required rerouting or schedule change. (e) Business Plan Implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. (f) Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices. (g) Alternatives: The District could refuse to permit the event to occur at this location. In this event, the organizer may wish to select an alternative location within or outside the municipality. However, this event has a history in this community. CONCLUSIONS: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events and activities. Canada Day festivities have been held in Maple Ridge for several years and the organizers have requested perrruissiot to hold the event on municipal streets for 2007. Submitted by: d w Wood, PhD., PEng. Municipal Engineer .approved by: Frank Quinn, NMA, PEng. CAM: Public Works & ev bment Services Concurrence: f . L. Ui ) Rule Chief dministrative Officer N1 L / III I Schedule `A' To Council Memorandum Dated )une 7. 2007 Canada Day Event Condition of Approval Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers: 1. provide all necessary- traffic controls, parking and emergence access acceptable to the R.C.M.P., and the District of Maple Ridge (the District); 2. notify local Fire Department, and Ambulance Services of the event; 3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; 4. advertise the event in a Local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of the event (a minin7um of one week prior to the event date); 5. notify all affected businesses in the area of closures as soon as possible (per letter provided by the District); 6. make arrangements for all surrounding businesses and residents for access purposes during the event: must maintain access for emergency- services to the effected areas at all times. 8. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any way- connected with the event; 9. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance policy- providing coverage of not less than S5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy- shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District." Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability- Clause. A copy of such policy- shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; and 10. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the District. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw permission to use municipal streets for this and future events should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements. Chief Administrative Officer INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MATHEW LI, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FROM: PAULINE VANDERMOOR / JACKIE SENCHYNA PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES SUBJECT: ROAD CLOSURE FOR CANADA DAY CELEBRATIONS DATE: 5/24/2007 The Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day Committee is currently planning Maple Ridge's 2007 Canada Day Festival, to be held in Memorial Peace Park. The Canada Day celebrations are organized by a volunteer committee in partnership with the Maple Ridge / Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services. The Canada Day Committee once again requests approval for the closure of roads leading into Memorial Peace Park. 3 Locations are requested on Sunday, July 1, 2007 between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:00pm to accommodate the event: 1) Entrance off 224" Street leading into the ring road of Memorial Peace Park 2) Exiting out of the Park at MacIntosh Avenue & 224" Street 3) Fraser Street and Dewdney Trunk Rd. (leading in from Rogers Video & Photo Express) and Fraser St and MacIntosh Ave. The site map and format from the previous year will be implemented. Letters have been sent to the Maple Ridge RCMP, Ambulance Service of B.C., B.C. Transit, Maple Ridge Fire Department, Maple Ridge Taxi/Meadow Ridge Taxi, advising of this event. Merchants along the closure route will be contacted with the closure information as well. Thank you in advance for your support of this annual community event. If you have any questions or recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact Pauline at 467- 7466 (local 7466) or Jackie at 467-7321 (local 7321). Pauline Vandermoor / Jackie Senchyna Dept. Liaison, Maple Ridge Canada Day Committee NM FORM `A' Details of the Event Date:: Contact PersonzLA,-(, �^C- Fax Details: � e ,, ,A Sketch of Traffic Control Plan: RCMP concurrence for the proposed Traffic Control Plan The following agencies have been advised and acknowledge the event: BC Transit z Fire Department Ambulance Services Other FORM `A' Details of the Event Date::Ar--", I ( :--) 6 41 - 7 Contact Person Llllk.,�_ 1; PhoneFax Lcc Details: Sketch of Traffic Control Plan: Thefollowing agencies have been advised and acknowledge the event: BC Transit ✓ Fire Department Ambulance Services ✓ Other -Pitt PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES Corporal Rob Lemon Ridge Meadows RCMP Municipal Traffic 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge April 26, 2007 Dear Corporal Lemon: Subject: Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day Event 2007 My name is Pauline Vandermoor and I am the Parks & Leisure Services Liaison for the 2007 Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day Event. Maple Ridge Parks & Leisure Services is working in partnership with the Maple Ridge Farmer's Market, The Maple Ridge ACT and a local volunteer committee on this fun, family day. Parks & Leisure Services request approval for the use of sidewalks and roadways within the Memorial Peace Park on Sunday, July 1, 2007 between the hours of 6:00 am and 4:00 pm. Vehicle access to the ring road encircling the park will be limited to farm vehicles setting up for the market and other exhibitors dropping of their necessary materials prior to the event kick-off. Entrance and exit points from 2241h into the park and from Dewdney Trunk Road onto Fraser Street where it runs into McIntosh Avenue will be closed and strictly patrolled by volunteers. There will be some activity in the park from approximately 8:00 am onwards leading up to the official ceremony between noon and 1:30 pm. Music, dance and other entertainment continues afterwards both in the park and in the ACT theatre until 4:00 pm. As always, we expect anywhere from 5 — 10,000 spectators throughout the day. ❑ 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9 Telephone:(604)467-7346 Fax (6041467-7?Q3 The attached site map indicates the set up for the day's activities as well as locations of traffic barricades, the First Aid area and Farmer's Market set up and parking. St. John Ambulance will be in attendance. Letters will be sent to the Ambulance Service of B.C., B.C. Transit, Maple Ridge Fire Department and Handy Dart advising of this event. Merchants along the route will also be contacted in accordance with requirements of the District of Maple Ridge Engineering Department. We believe this traffic flow plan will ensure a fun and safe event. We would appreciate your provision of sign -off on this request so we can forward it to the Engineering Department to continue our planning stages. If you have any questions or recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact me at 467-7466 or email at pvandermoor(d�mapleridge.org. Thank you in advance for your support of this year's Multicultural Canada Day Event. Sincerely, Pauline Vandermoor, Dept. Liaison — 2007 Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day Event Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Encl. 2 PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES Translink Bus Service & Handy Dart 1600 — 4720 Kingsway Burnaby, BC V5H 4N2 April 27, 2007 To whom it may concern: Re: 2007 Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day Event. My name is Pauline Vandermoor and I am the Parks & Leisure Services Liaison for the 2007 Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day Event. Maple Ridge Parks & Leisure Services is working in partnership with the Maple Ridge Farmer's Market, The Maple Ridge ACT and a local volunteer committee on this fun, family day. The event takes place in the Memorial Peace Park on Sunday, July 1, 2007 between the hours of 6:00 am and 4:00 pm. Vehicle access to the ring road encircling the park will be limited to farm vehicles setting up for the market and other exhibitors dropping of their necessary materials prior to the event kick-off. Entrance and exit points from 224`i' into the park and from Dewdney Trunk Road onto Fraser Street where it runs into McIntosh Avenue will be closed and strictly patrolled by volunteers. There will be some activity in the park from approximately 8:00 am onwards leading up to the official ceremony between noon and 1:30 pm. Music, dance and other entertainment continues afterwards both in the park and in the ACT theatre until 4:00 pm. As always, we expect anywhere from 5 — 10,000 spectators throughout the day. We want to ensure that the local Translink Bus Service and Handy Dart Services have been advised of this year's Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day event date and time. Thank you in advance for your support for this year's Canada Day. If you have any questions or recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact me at 467-7466, email: pvandermoor(z ,mapleridge.org. Sincerely, Pauline Vandermoor, Department Liaison, 2007 Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day Event Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Encl. /eTeleph.111� 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9 (604) 467-7346 Fax (604) 467-7393 Fire Chief - Peter Grootendorst Director of Operations & Staff Development Maple Ridge Fire Department 22703 Dewdney Trunk Rd. Maple Ridge, BC April 27, 2007 Dear Mr. Grootendorst: Re: 2007 Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day Event My name is Pauline Vandermoor and I am the Parks & Leisure Services Liaison for the 2007 Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day Event. Maple Ridge Parks & Leisure Services is working in partnership with the Maple Ridge Farmer's Market, The Maple Ridge ACT and a local volunteer committee on this fun, family day. The event takes place in the Memorial Peace Park on Sunday, July 1, 2007 between the hours of 6:00 am and 4:00 pm. Vehicle access to the ring road encircling the park will be limited to farm vehicles setting up for the market and other exhibitors dropping of their necessary materials prior to the event kick-off. Entrance and exit points from 220 into the park and from Dewdney Trunk Road onto Fraser Street where it runs into McIntosh Avenue will be closed and strictly patrolled by volunteers. I have enclosed a site plan for your reference. There will be some activity in the park from approximately 8:00 am onwards leading up to the official ceremony between noon and 1:30 pm. Music, dance and other entertainment continues afterwards both in the park and in the ACT theatre until 4:00 pm. As always, we expect anywhere from 5 — 10,000 spectators throughout the day and we wanted to ensure that the local Fire Department has been notified of this events date, time and route. If you require further information you may contact me at 604 467-7466 or pvandermooramapleridge.org. Thank you. Sincerely, Pauline Vandermoor, Department Liaison — 2007 Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day Event Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Encl. <Tellphone� 5 Haney Place ple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9 604) 467-7346 Fax:(604)467-7393 PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES B.C. Ambulance Service Station 257 unit Chief 22320 Selkirk Ave. Maple Ridge April 27, 2007 To Whom It May Concern: Re: 2007 Maple Ridge Multicultural Day Event My name is Pauline Vandermoor and I am the Parks & Leisure Services Liaison for the 2007 Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day Event. Maple Ridge Parks & Leisure Services is working in partnership with the Maple Ridge Farmer's Market, The Maple Ridge ACT and a local volunteer committee on this fun, family day. The event takes place in the Memorial Peace Park on Sunday, July 1, 2007 between the hours of 6:00 am and 4:00 pm. Vehicle access to the ring road encircling the park will be limited to farm vehicles setting up for the market and other exhibitors dropping of their necessary materials prior to the event kick-off. Entrance and exit points from 224`h into the park and from Dewdney Trunk Road onto Fraser Street where it runs into McIntosh Avenue will be closed and strictly patrolled by volunteers. St. John Ambulance will be in attendance and I have included a site map for your information. There will be some activity in the park from approximately 8:00 am onwards leading up to the official ceremony between noon and 1:30 pm. Music, dance and other entertainment continues afterwards both in the park and in the ACT theatre until 4:00 pm. As always, we expect anywhere from 5 — 10,000 spectators throughout the day and we wanted to ensure that you have been advised of the event date and time. If you have any questions or recommendations, please do not hesitate to contact me at 467-7466, email: pvandermoor(Fbmaplerid e.or . Sincerely, Pauline Vandermoor, Department Liaison, 2007 Maple Ridge Multicultural Canada Day Event Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Encl. ❑ 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9 Telephone: (604) 467-7346 Fax: (604) 467-7393 � � 1W3-OR� ��� �����0�������/������������ ������ o xo�u����m �~ ��w xn����*�n��n����� TmS S TC CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE AS HEREIN DESCRIBED HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED BELOW AND ARE |NFORCE ATTHE DATE HEREOF: � THIS CERTIFICATE |SISSUED ATTHE REQUEST OF: � CORP. OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE R|DGE, CITY OF P|TT MEADOWS, RIDGE MEADOWS PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES COMMISSION, SCHOOL DISTRICT 42 i ABOVE ARE ADDED ASADDITIONAL INSURED, BUT SOLELY �VV|TH RESPECT TDTHE LIABILITY WHICH ARISES OUT OF THE ACTIVITIES OFTHE NAMED INSURED rc^H(��^:orICew/u-asMAILED /rSUCH INSURANCE /sCANCELLED -pSUCH AMANNER xoroAFFECT THIS CERTIFICATE NAME OFINSURED � | MULTICULTURAL CANADADAY SOCIETY i � c/o 22387DavvdneyTrunk Rd. � Maple LOCATION AND OPERATIONS � TOWHICH THIS CERTIFICATE APPLIES | MEMORIAL PEACE PARK, MAPLE RIDGE, BC | ^CANAD4DAY CELEBRATIONS" | *excluding rides, horse activities & fireworks, unless under the | direction of licensed py,oteohnician | | |KIND OF POLICY POLICY NO. INSURERS LIMIT OF LIABILITY| / ' �ENERA�uAB|�Ty � AS1111 AVK/AINSURANCE COK4PANYOFCANADA � S5'00O0OOOU | � � | � INCLUSIVE LIMIT � / BODILY INJURY/ ! � | PROPERTY DAMAGE � | ~DEDUCT|BLE$5UO.00 / *CROSS LIABILITY CLAUSE INCLUDED *SUBJECT TO 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OR MATERIAL CHANGE -1 HE SNSURANCE AFFORDED IS SUBJECT TC THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF THE APPLICABLE POLiCY. �LL��D�T|��U���CEKA/\BKET/N��L�O woy�o�zoor , o7/osnu AUTHORIZED REF m0604 507. 1387West Broadway, Vancouver, BCV8H4AQ mor TEL(804)737-3018 FAX (804)737-307U ra Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: SUBJECT His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Caribbean Street Festival EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DATE: June 7, 2007 FILE NO: E01-035-001.5 ATTN: C of W A request has been received from the Caribbean Street Festival Committee to use municipal streets for their annual Caribbean Street Festival on Sunday July 15, 2007, between 12:00 PM and 9:00 PM. A cope of the request is attached. Authorization from Council is required in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By-law 3136-1982" to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge. RECOMMENDATION: THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the Caribbean Street Festival on Sunday July 15, 2007, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule `A' attached to the staff report dated June 7, 2007 are met. DISCUSSION: (a) Background Context: From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability for injury or damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as Schedule "A". It should be noted that the festival organizer has applied to the Liquor Control Board for an outdoor beer garden license. Set up will begun at 9:00 AM and clean-up will continue until 11:30 PM. The Caribbean Street Festival is scheduled from 12:00 PM to 9:00 PMand will require the following road closures: • 224 Street from Dewdnev Trunk Road to 119 Avenue; • I\-IcIntosh Avenue from 223 Street to Fraser Street; i Fraser Street from Dewdnev Trunk. Road to McIntosh .Avenue; ® Haney Place Road; ® 1-laney Place Mall parking lot exit at 119 Avenue will be restricted; and ® Underground parking lot exit onto McIntosh Ave will be closed, as well as the parking lot entrance at Haney Place Road. ' '1 (b) Strategic Plan: Permitting of Maple Ridge street events allows the District to manage road infrastructure and associated risks but vet allows events that promote communist- development and highlight Maple Ridge's natural and built features. (c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Permission to use municipal streets may cause some minor delays and inconveniences to other road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the Caribbean Street Festival volunteers. In addition, the organizers will be distributing an information letter to affected businesses and residents. (d) Governmental Implications: The road use permit establishes that the festival organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP, for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service). (e) Business Plan Implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. (f) Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices. (g) Alternatives: The District could refuse to permit the event to occur at this location. In this event, the organizer may wish to select an alternative location within or outside the municipality. However, this event has a history in this community. CONCLUSIONS: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events and activities. The Caribbean Street Festival has been held in Maple Ridge for the past six years and the organizers have requested permission to hold the event on municipal streets for 2007. 1 Submitted by: Andrew Wood, PhD., PEng. Municipal Engine%" /Ipproved b) ent Services Concurrence: J. L. (Jim2nistrative ule e Chief A Officer Schedule `A' To Council Memorandum Dated Tune 7, 2007 Caribbean Street Festival Condition of Approval Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers: 1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergence- access acceptable to the R.C.lv1.P., and the District of Maple Ridge (the District); notify local Fire Department, and Ambulance Services of the event; 3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; 4. advertise the event and give notice of the road closure in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses of the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date); 5. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any wav connected with the event; 6. obtain the required permits from Parks & Leisure Services for use of their facilities; 7. the organizer must obtain the necessary provincial permits for the proposed beer garden; 8. consumption of alcohol beverages in areas other that those approved by the Liquor Control Board during this event is not permitted; ). must maintain access for emergency services to the closure area at all times; 10. make arrangements with the District if "temporary" parking restrictions are required prior to the event; 11. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance police providing coverage of not less than a5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said police shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District." Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such police shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; and 12. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than ghat which existed prior to the event, all within 2.1 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the Corporation; The Corporation of District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw this permission to use Municipal Streets should the organizers fail to comple, with the above requirements. Chief _Administrative Officer 03/09/2007 14:19 6044630203 U3/09/1007 11:06 FAX 604 467 7633 52/22/2007 11:44 6044630203 RCMP RIDGE MEADOWS PAGE 05 /0004/008 PAGE 83 r The Caribbean Festival Cowan;ttee's goal is to oreate a unique, lively and colourful street festival that appeals to all ages and walks of life, in an effort to assist in the reguvenation of the !Maple Ridge downtown core. This festival highlights the music and fun of the Caribbean cultures, and encourages audsonce participation with singing and dancing. Naturally, the safety and secuxity of Participants would be a top priority. hats & TLMO: This year the, festival will be on .1'uly 15i '4 from noon until 9 "A' Set up for the festival will begin at 9 a.m. and clean-up till continue until 11:30pm. On 224':" Street from Dowdney Trunk Road south to 119 Avenue. The street will be closed to traffic during the festival, except for emergency vehicles. The stage will be set up at th+a intersection of McIntosh Avenue and 224th Street facing east so that the music can be channeled north and south along 224t'h Street. The event also uaes Memorial Peace Park. Act-tv'I'L,ies Music is the main focus of the days activities, with live act and DJ music to fill in the breaks. In addition, there 03/09/2007 14:19 US/UU/ZUU7 11:U5 FAX 02/ 22/2087 11: 4 d 6044630203 604 467 7633 6044630203 PAGE 06 10005/008 PAGE 04 will be food vendors and arts and crafts vendors. Me hope, once again this year, to attract cultural demonstrations and Latin dance classes as well. There will be a beer garden again this year. There will be a Kidzone in the Park for the children including rides and games. Sponsorship for this event is sought from -various businesses and organizations i= and outside of the community® 1mti o : The Caribbean Festival camuni.ttae has already been in touch with the Maple Ridge Festivals Society and will continue act under its ,auspices. to The Caribbean Street Festival falls half way bOtween the c0munity's Canada Day celebration and the annual Jazz and Blues ir0stival, creating a oontinuum of entertaizxment options for the conmlunityy, $tartinq July let and going until the end of August. It is our expectation that this Caribbean Festival will provide a vital link in a chain of similar com=an'ty festivals stretching from May 1 thought October 31 each year. The Caribbean Street Festival also offers locsl businesses the oPPortunity to promote themselves wither through Participation and/or sponsorship. In addition, it is expected that they would take advantage of the opportunity Of having a large gathering of people outside their doors, 03/09/2007 14:19 6044630203 03/09/2007 11:07 FAX 604 467 7633 E12/22/2007 11;44 6044630203 PAGE 07 lig 006/008 PAGE 05 Zca ff o ConttoT Plan icwdes: We will place barricades at the intersections indicated on the map. We will also be cloning Fraser street and the road that runs around Memoria,], peace Park_ All barricades will have volunteera manning then► sa that they can be moved easily for ameeargency vehicles. Uftergrancy Vihicl.s: One side Of 224th will be left cl®ar of obstacles (i.e. tables, tents and chairs) so that ele"r-gancy vehicles can got through if -needed_ The road around Memorial Peace Park will also ,be fra® of obstacles_ The RCMP, DC ambulance service and Maple Ridge Fire DOPart.nent will all be notified of the closure as soon as ors receive permission from the District of Maple Ridge. 03/09/2007 14:19 6044630203 PAGE 08 U3/UV/Z007 11:07 FAA 004 407 7633 RCMF RIDGE MEADOWS U007/008 02/22/2067 11:44 6844630203 PAGE 86 I � 03/013/2007 14:19 6044630203 03/08/Z007 11:08 FAX 604 467 7633 RCMP RIDGE MEADOWS 02/22/2087 11:44 G044630203 PAGE 09 19 008/008 PAGE 07 m ". 03/09/2007 14:19 6044630203 U3/UU/ZU07 11:05 FAX 804 467 7833 02/22/2007 11:44 6044630203 FORM •a• RCMP RIDGES MEADOWS PAGE 04 0003/008 PAGE 02 The follOyv�rrg 49encici haw beef ad,*ed and ac'know&c* t%c event. `� T/�.'�r�rt• .S�r,Cc �-�..��, TAre DoMnm We AmWanco s�Nto� a p prQ 03/09/2007 14:19 6044630203 03f09/2807 11:03 FAa 004 467 7633 RCIP RIDGE MEADOWS Royal Canadian Gendormene royaie ` Mc►.nted Police du Canada FACSIAMLE /MESSAGE ENVOI D-UN MESSAGE TRANSMITTAL PAR MkOPIEUR PAGE 02 10 001/'008 Page 1 Olydo 1 8•wrtty Cleselflcatioolpesionallon Cisosificationldesi®nation Procedoeca - Prlori14 TO ,¢ 07-63 ,e9 S/ / / t�%% Refennee No. - N` do W4;.nce FOR YOUR INFO. POUR VOT'RB Your File - V®tre n' de doealer INFORM. FROM Name • Now"Eke Out FII• - Notn n• do dosNor xC.;Q Otv, tiub•Dly, . S, 4iv. Branch. Some* WOW raw on Nmo GRAJ w9 tree Ol9R - R3o �Una lel UaUnll Colt. - Code dirMrrdas®, d• serv. �lroice�,, gamut • EXPemmuR RWPINMT - RiTI NATAIRE FIII No. - N" do WMe. Tel. Me. - • de NH, past No. - Wd• Ktt, isos. Tai. No. - N• do 161. bw, Rea. Tel. No.. w do tdl, rtc 60-467-1033 604-463.6251 SUNUECT e► Of3.►HT TOW ."or t of vasInoum" ma ar: /iP �G t,A�✓. S — Nwabro taw de peace. y comPrl s Coll" COMMENTS COUNENTAIRES T111I• -""go h Intended for 11te use at *a sddcss•••. Leta communleation set "c AI"reent dastinte etitri NI• sat adresef•. mcw*Oft4jun► of mesasps content broach ona or le dhnrlieNoa M ■on cordsrw "W conjM~ une In*=Mon a une ou mwe Ur". If you have resehrod this conununlcatlon Ousioura lo1e. SI vow awn rsqu code conmwdntlon par wraw, vwu9►ss un error. notttp. the $enact iMK"I■ y by Niephoo•. en ■rrissr IM"di■tonant Vexp6dttsur per K ilij*one. Operator - Op1r►rteur Tdephow No. - W de 1111ptron• pally No - W quotidian 04/12/2007 14:01 6044630203 Apr.12. 2007 1:58PM Johnston Meier Insurance PAGE 02 No, 8940 r. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE THIS 16 TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE AS HEREIN DESCRIBED HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED BELOW AND AAE IN FORCE AT THE MATE HEREOF: THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AT THE RECAJEST OF: CORP. OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, CITY OF Pr T MEADOWS, RIDGE MEADOWS PARKS d LEISURE SERVICE'S COMMISSION, SCHOOL DISTRICT 42 _ ABOVE ARE ADDED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED, BUT SOLELY WITH RESPECT TO THE LIABILITY WHICH ARISES OUT OF THE ACTTVTTiES OF THE NAMED INSURED NAME OF INSURED CARIBBEAN STREET FESTNAL SOCIETY LOCATION AND OPERATIONS TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE APPLIES MAPLE RIDGE / PITT MEADOWS, BC "ORGANIIATIONIADMINISTRATiON INCLUDING FE=VAL ACTIVITIES AS ON FILE WITH INSURER" 'a cGWng fire wrks (wiew under the dkealli n of s Bcwwd mateCItnk t in) 3 nteettWad Ades ecthri m TO WHOM NOTICE WILL u 10A.ED IF SUCH INU~Cl IS CANCELLED I Tenn MARCH 4, 2007 - MARCH 4. 2Q08 OR IS PHAMED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TQ AFFECT THIS CERTt>;ICATE KIND OF POLICY POLICY NO. INSURERS LIMIT OF LIABILITY GENERAL LIABILITYAS2423 AVIVA INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA $5.WD,000.00 Ind Emit 'DEDUCTIBLE SSMOO DIRECTORS A OFFICERS LIABILITY POLICY EXTENSIONS 'CROSS LIA ury CLAUSE INCLUDED "SUBJECT TO 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SPORT- 1 ► 507,1367Broadway. Vancouver, SC V6H TEL 61' 11: ..�. :�" i ell LOOM�.� CORPORATION OF THE MAPLE RIDGE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 4, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/050/06 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Workshop SUBJECT: Maple Ridge Development Procedures Amending Bylaw No. 6477 — 2007 Maple Ridge Delegation Bylaw No. 6478 - 2007 Council Action Items out of The Development Process Review Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This report follows up on several recommendations in the Development Process Review Report prepared by UMA Engineering in 2004 and presented to Council (the UMA report). The Council at the time endorsed the report recommendations but asked for a follow up report on several issues requiring further action. Staff has reported back to Council on the Advisory Design Panel Bylaw and the policy for Development Information Meetings leaving four issues/recommendations to be addressed. Some of the recommendations have been expanded upon, and one additional recommendation relating to development permit notification is being brought forward for Council direction. These items relate to: i) Delegating authority to review and approve minor amendments to development permit plans; ii) Requiring the development permit application at the same time as the rezoning application where applicable; iii) Delegating authority to issue environmental development permits within development permit areas designated under Section 919.1 (1) (a) of the Local Government Act (Natural Features and Watercourse Protection Development Permits); iv) Scheduling the Council meeting for the day after the Committee of the Whole for land use application matters; v) Authorizing staff to send the required notification of Council consideration of a development variance permit without having Council consider whether to send the notice on each case individually. This report will deal with each of these issues separately and recommend relevant bylaw, policy, and procedural changes. RECOMMENDATION: 1) That Maple Ridge Development Procedures Amending Bylaw No. 6477 - 2007 be read a first, second, and third time and; 2) That Maple Ridge Delegation Bylaw No. 6478 — 2007 be read a first, second, and third time; 3) That Council authorize the Manager of Legislative Services to send the required notification for development variance permits in accordance with Section 922.6 of the Local Government Act without having Council consider whether to send the notice on each case individually. f 1) Minor Amendments To Development Permits: Issue 9.6 of the UMA report recommends that the Director of Planning be authorized to approve minor variations to Development Permit drawings. Changes to drawings inevitably occur between the development permit stage and the building permit stage as drawings evolve. There is currently no legislation, policies or guidelines for handling these changes. Therefore, applicants have had to apply for a new development permit with full process and Council review when changes are made after development permit issuance. This can be expensive and time consuming for applicants and additional workload for staff and Council. If staff is to approve minor plan changes, it needs to be done in a consistent fashion which is endorsed by Council. A delegation bylaw is required to implement this recommendation and has been prepared. To guide staff in the review and consideration of minor amendments associated guidelines have been developed and attached to the bylaw. The guidelines would provide for a consistent approach to consideration of minor amendments to plans, but not allow significant changes to the development without Council authorization. Bylaw No. 6478-2007 would delegate this authority to the Director of Planning or in his or her absence, the Manager of Development and Environmental Services. All changes would be considered in the context of the guidelines. As required under the Local Government Act, a procedure to have Council reconsider a decision by staff is included in the Bylaw. The new Official Community Plan also provides the ability to deal with some situations that would have previously required a development permit through an expanded list of development permit exemptions. This combined with other recommendations contained in this report will provide some additional tools for gaining efficiencies in the process. It is recommended that Council give three readings to Maple Ridge Delegation Bylaw No. 6478-2007. 2) Development Permit Application Submission With The Rezoning Application And More Complete Information. Requiring Development Permit Applications to be submitted with the Rezoning application was recommendation 9.1 in the UMA report. Under issue 9.4 of the report the consultant recommends more detailed information be provided with the initial application. The UMA report also generally discussed the need for updated Bylaws and checklists/handouts etc. The UMA report observed that development application processing in the District of Maple Ridge is in a state of transition, moving from a small community to one which includes broader community objectives and concerns typically associated with larger urban centres. The development process needs to be aligned accordingly. The consultant recognized that "Council and the Community require greater design detail and certainty when considering rezoning applications". This recommendation is aimed at increasing information requirements with the initial rezoning application. The method proposed is by requiring the development permit application to be submitted with the rezoning application. It is suggested that this recommendation be expanded to include other applications as well, such as the subdivision application and development variance permit application if required. In addition, new checklists are needed to update the current checklists, make them more user friendly and to reflect the new processes. The need for the new checklists and plan requirements are also driven by the recently amended Watercourse Protection Bylaw and the new Official Community Plan particularly with regard to environmental matters. )Description of Bylaw Amendment: A text amendment to the District of Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended, is required to address this recommended change. The Bylaw amendment would essentially do the following: -2- Divide the current checklists for application submissions related to development applications so that each type of application would stand on its own as a separate checklist. (This would not include subdivision as the application requirements for subdivision are contained in the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw); Correct an existing reference error in the bylaw; Modify application requirements for those sites involving multiple applications, so that they would be required to be submitted together. A development permit application would not be required for most applications for rezoning to single family residential, except where a subdivision is for intensive development in the R-3 zone, includes land within a watercourse or natural features development permit area, or where a development permit is specifically required in the Zoning Bylaw. (RG-2 and RG-3). The proposed bylaw amendment also provides the ability for alternative processing and submission requirements for large, multi- phased, mixed use projects, where architectural drawings at the initial stage may be less practical; Update the checklists to reflect today's information requirements and the revised processes. Require a corresponding subdivision proposal where applicable, to be found to be technically feasible before a rezoning application can proceed to Public Hearing. Provide staff with the authority to close inactive rezoning, development permit, and development variance permit applications where no meaningful activity has occurred within any 12 month period. Planning Analysis: The above amendment is being brought forward for a number of reasons. For ease of reading, the analysis will be broken out into two areas as follows: Revised Checklists and Amendment to Procedural Bylaw • The UMA report identified the need for updated bylaws and application checklists, and reducing the number of reports to Council by combining reports. The revised process, new checklists, and the delegation of issuance of development permits, would address these recommendations; • The new OCP has introduced new Development Permit areas for watercourse protection and natural features, and expanded the objectives and guidelines for many development permit areas. This in turn, requires updating of checklists and handouts and ensuring plan submissions are sufficient to address development permit area guidelines; The existing Bylaw Application Submission Requirements contained in Schedule A (attached) were established in the form of an add -on method to identify different requirements for different applications. Schedule A was later converted to a handout and over time this handout has proven to be somewhat confusing and difficult to use by applicants. The revised separate checklists are felt to be clearer and more concise for the wide range of users and their varying knowledge of development application processing; There is an existing reference in Clause I of the Bylaw where it refers to a plan in "B" above whereas that reference should be to "D". The amendment replaces this section so this anomaly will be automatically corrected; The existing Bylaw can be confusing in its requirements and this will be corrected in the amendment. For example, Clause D requires one full set of architectural blueprints and then, later, Clause E requires additional plans that should be included in a "full set" of architectural blueprints. It is a bit unclear as to the intention and the new checklists will clarify requirements; -3- The bylaw amendment would update application requirements. An example of this would be eliminating requirements such as a context plan and legal survey (except where required to identify conservation boundaries) and add requirements which in practice are currently required like site profiles, arborist reports, and tree surveys, to address potential tree retention opportunities. In addition, Council has recently directed that requirements for Watercourse Development Permits be modified and the revised checklist will reflect this; The Procedural Bylaw contains provisions for dealing with rezoning applications where they have reached the third reading stage but have not taken the necessary actions to secure final adoption within 12 months of third reading. It does not however, address inactive applications which have been submitted in the past and have been sitting without any status for extended periods of time in some cases. A bylaw amendment is being proposed whereby applications can be closed after 12 months of inactivity. Increased Information and Parallel Application Processing For some time now, it has become evident that Council and the public are demanding more information and input on development applications at the rezoning and public consultation stage. In order to provide this information, more complete plans, submission materials, and reports are required at an early stage in the process; The public wants some assurance that what is shown at Development Information Meetings and the Public Hearing is actually built and not changed later. More complete plans will be required for rezoning and development permit applications, thereby providing more detailed information. The intent is to focus on the whole development initially and process applications as concurrently as possible. Processing applications concurrently will allow for issuance of the Development Permit at the final reading stage, giving Council a level of assurance that the intended development to accompany the rezoning will be followed through to building permit except for minor changes and shortening process time for the applicant. Any significant changes to the plans would require further input from the Advisory Design Committee and Council approval. This would not however, guarantee that what is authorized in the development permit would be built, since hypothetically, an applicant could let the development permit lapse, or request an amendment. However, in either case a process would be involved and Council approval would be required. In addition, given plan requirements and required time lines for processing, it is less likely an applicant would totally change the project once the development permit level of commitment was made. ® From a public information and legal perspective, it is necessary to have all reports and information available in advance of the Public Hearing, to allow the public the opportunity to review it. The types of reports would include traffic, environmental, geotechnical and site servicing methods. Under the current process when land is "pre -zoned" on preliminary conceptual plans, the applicant may not have thoroughly worked out development costs, Building Code issues, Official Community Plan policy, Zoning Bylaw requirements or architectural elements. When they reach the development permit application stage, this can result in significant changes occurring to the original proposal. The public can feel they have been misled about the proposal or that the project is being modified for economic reasons. Development Permit drawings require more information which requires the project architect and the applicant to think out the design more completely, resulting in fewer changes after Public Hearing and less miscommunication with the public. More complete plan submissions will allow for a more thorough review in relation to Development Permit area guidelines which provides Council and the public with a better understanding as to how the land use and a particular development may comply with Official Community Plan policy; -4- • More complete drawings will help staff to identify any significant bylaw variances at an early stage, giving the public and Council this information early on, and reducing the potential for public opposition to a future development variance permit application; Under the current process, rezoning, development permit, development variance permit, and subdivision applications are most often run "end to end". This has two major impacts. Firstly, applications can take a considerable amount of time to clear through the system (often times years) and Council may end up seeing numerous reports on the same development but related applications. This is not only time consuming for Council, but also results in repetitive administration for staff. Processing the applications concurrently will allow reports to be combined, resulting in reduced work load, less administration, and fewer reports to Council. Processing applications concurrently combined with other process changes recommended by the consultants will also reduce processing times, which should be attractive to applicants even though they may have slightly higher costs initially for plans and studies before obtaining zoning approval. In addition, the public has raised concerns with studies and information not being available at Public Hearing but through other less public processes like subdivision and development permit. Secondly, the current approach results in many issues being raised late in the process because all applications are not addressed at the same time. This results in developer complaints of "late hits" or of road blocks which are often a product of the current process; • The past practice of pre -zoning lands without tying down the project in a development permit tends to increase the property value, without a commitment on the development, or to the community, and can lead to sale of the zoned site to a third party who may want to develop something contrary to that shown at development information meetings and the Public Hearing; Supporting this process is the encouragement to have an early pre -application meeting to clarify requirements and answer questions. 3) Dele,-ation OfAuthority For Issuance Of Environmental Development Permits Issue 9.10 in the report recommends the Director of Planning seek Council support to delegate issuance of Environmental Development Permits. This would result in time saving for staff in report preparation and for Council in reviewing and considering these reports. It would also result in significant time saving for applicants by eliminating the approximate three week processing time involved with Council approval. Environmental Development Permit areas utilize regulations, guidelines and requirements of a highly technical nature. Generally, there are no significant political issues with these types of permits, and therefore they are a suitable candidate for delegation. Typically, this has involved approximately 15 to 17 development permits a year of this nature being forwarded through Council. All of these applications required accompanying reports and processing time. Section 154 of the Community Charter provides the authority for delegation of issuance of Development Permits and requires that such delegation be authorized by Bylaw. Maple Ridge Delegation Bylaw No. 6478-2007 would also address this subject. Section 920(12) of the Local Government Act requires that where a Local Government delegates the power to issue a Development Permit, the owner of the land that is subject to the permit be entitled to have the Local Government reconsider the matter. The process and reconsideration is included in the Delegation Bylaw as required under the Charter. Where it is felt that an application warrants Council review it can still be forwarded in the normal manner. It is recommended that Council give three readings to Maple Ridge Delegation By-law No. 6478 - 2007. -5- 4) Council Meeting To Be Held The Day After The Committee Of The Whole. This report recommendation is to adjust Committee of the Whole and Council meeting dates, so that the Council meeting would be held the day after the Committee of the Whole. The time savings would be one week and in the context of the overall development process would not be significant. The current process gives Council time to think over the information received at the Committee of the Whole and make site visits if desired. It also provides staff time before the Council meeting to research and prepare responses to any questions or requests for additional information which may arise at the Committee meeting. In addition, the Council and Committee meetings have already been set and published for this year. For these reasons, changes to meeting scheduling is not recommended at this time. If Council feels this change is worthy of further consideration, they may wish to review it when the 2008 meeting schedule is prepared. S) Development Variance Permit Notification Section 7.4 of the UMA report comments on the preparation of Development Variance Permits during the mail out notification period. The current practice is to have Council consider notification for each development variance permit application individually. This usually requires a separate report and a two week delay in processing. It also makes timing difficult to have the variance permit and other approvals considered at the same Council meeting or combined in one report. At times, this results in Council approving zoning and a development permit two weeks before considering a development variance permit which may be required to make the development possible. Procedural Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999, Clause 7 (2) requires that "Notice of Council consideration of a resolution to issue a Development Variance Permit shall be mailed to or otherwise delivered to all owners or tenants in occupation of all parcels, any parts of which are adjacent to the property that is subject to the permit". This bylaw section is in keeping with the Local Government Act section 722.6 which requires a notice be mailed or otherwise delivered at least 10 days before the adoption of a resolution to issue the permit. Neither the Local Government Act nor the Procedural Bylaw require that Council direct that the notice be sent on each individual application. It appears this is a matter of practice rather than a requirement. In the spirit of reducing staff reports, Council workload, and processing times, it is recommended that Council consider delegating the notification authority to staff who will build it into the process and notify automatically depending on application scheduling. In most cases under the new processes, Council should be made aware of potential variances at the rezoning stage. CITIZEN/CUSTOMER IMPLICATIONS: The proposed process and application requirement changes in this report will ensure that the public have access to more detailed information at the development information meetings and Public Hearings. From the developer's perspective, these proposed changes will potentially involve higher costs at the beginning of the process and a level of commitment to the development plans submitted. However, the applicant will gain a higher level of comfort as to project feasibility if the overall development is looked at more closely at an early stage, (rather than piecemeal) and more detailed input from staff, and the Advisory Design Panel is secured earlier in the process. In addition, and perhaps more importantly, this and other consultant recommendations may, over time, result in more efficient use of staff time which should translate into shorter processing times generally for applications. Other benefits for the development industry will be achieved through the ability of staff to approve minor amendments to development permit plans rather than go back through the development permit process, by delegation of the ability to issue environmental development permits, and by delegating development variance permit notification. -6- INTERDEPARTMENTAL IMPLICATIONS: Applications are processed cross departmentally and the current method of processing them has been learned and practiced over time. Past practice has been one of "land use first" and then look more closely at things like detailed servicing, subdivision geometry, and other technical and detailed building design considerations. This often involved processing applications end to end rather than concurrently. The suggested approach will involve looking at the development in totality rather than piecemeal which is the case when applications are processed end to end. The new processes will require staff to focus on all applications and related file issues at the same time which is a fundamental shift in application processing. Support for these initiatives from departments involved in development processing will be crucial to the success of the changes proposed. CONCLUSION: Development process re -engineering takes time and has as its goal to work towards continuous improvement. The benefits of individual process changes will not be seen immediately. The bylaw amendments and policy direction recommended in this report will provide clear Council direction to commence the process changes in these areas and initiate a change in the way applications have been received and processed in the past. In addition, other recommendations in the Development Process Review report will continue to be implemented. Over time, once all process adjustments are made, new processes are learned, staff training is completed and the development industry understands expectations, the benefits will begin to be achieved. Some of these benefits would include improved information for Council and the public at the initial application stage, shorter processing times for the overall process and in particular for environmental development permits, more efficient use of staff time, less repetitive administration, and more certainty and consistency in the process. It is recommended that Council endorse the recommendations in this report as a step towards improving the development process in Maple Ridge. Prepared by: Cha R. Goddard, B.A. M.A. Ma ager D elopment and Environmental Services Approved ane Picker' , MCIP Dir ct Lanni /17 Approved bye Frank Quinn, MB -, .En 0 i6M: Public Wovks & De tonment Services Concurrence: . L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer KM/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Schedule A to Bylaw 5879 - 1999 Maple Ridge Development Procedures Amending Bylaw No. 6477 - 2007 Maple Ridge Delegation Bylaw No. 6478- 2007. -7- The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 6478 — 2007 Maple Ridge Development Permit Delegation Bylaw The Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: Citation This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Development Permit Delegation Bylaw No. 6478 - 2007". Delegation of Powers Respecting Environmental Development Permit Areas Council hereby delegates to the Director of Planning, or in that person's absence, the Manager of Development and Environmental Services, all of Council's powers, duties and functions under Sections 920, 925, 926, and 928 of the Local Government Act in respect of all development permit areas designated under s. 919.1 (1) (a) of that Act; Where the delegatee requires security in respect of a development permit issued under Section 2, the delegatee should determine the security having regard to the cost of the works, construction or other activities for which the security is required. Delegation of Minor Amendment Powers 4. Council hereby delegates to the Director of Planning, or in that persons absence, the Manager of Development and Environmental Services, the power to amend any development permit issued by Council under Section 920 of the Local Government Act or by a delegatee under this Bylaw. The delegatee shall not amend a development permit under Section 4, unless the delegatee considers that the amendment is a minor amendment that conforms with the guidelines attached as Schedule A. An application for a minor amendment shall be made in a form satisfactory to the delegatee and shall be accompanied by such information as the delegatee considers necessary to enable him or her to appropriately review the application. Reconsideration by Council 7. All of the following apply to any decision by a delegate under this Bylaw: a) Any owner of property that is subject to a decision under this Bylaw who is dissatisfied with the decision is entitled to have the decision reconsidered by Council in accordance with this Section; b) Any owner who wishes to have a decision reconsidered by Council must apply for the reconsideration by delivering written notice of the request for reconsideration to the Maple Ridge Development Permit Delegation Bylaw No. 6478-2007 Page 2 Manager of Legislative Services within 30 days after the decision is communicated in writing to the owner, and provide i) the name of the delegatee who made the decision, the date of the decision and the nature of the decision; ii) reasons why the owner wishes the decision to be reconsidered by Council; ill) the decision the owner requests be made by Council, with brief reasons in support of the requested decision; and iv) a copy of any materials considered by the owner to be relevant to the reconsideration by Council. c) A reconsideration application must be considered by Council at a regular meeting of Council; d) The Manager of Legislative Services must: i) place each reconsideration application on the agenda for a regular meeting of Council in accordance with Section 7(c); ii) give notice of each reconsideration by Council in accordance with any notice requirements in respect of the original application that are set out in the Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw or the Local Government Act; and iii) before each reconsideration by Council, deliver to each Council member a copy of the materials that were considered by the delegatee in making the decision that is to be reconsidered. e) In reconsidering a decision the Council must consider the material that was considered by the delegatee in making the decision; f) Council is entitled to adjourn a reconsideration of a decision. g) After having reconsidered a decision, Council may either confirm the decision or may set aside the decision and substitute the decision of Council. READ a first time this day of 12007. READ a second time this day of 2007. READ a third time this day of 2007. , 2007. Q), Schedule "A" to Bylaw 6478- 2007 MAPLE RTDGE GUIDELINES FOR CONSIDERATION OF MINOR AMMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT PERMITS Introduction These criteria are intended as a guide for review of minor changes to approved Development Permit drawings, which will not result in the need for an amendment application to be considered by Council. Minor changes do not include modifications to the basic form and character of a development and will not involve impact to adjacent properties and the streetscape. Proposed modifications should enhance the project and should not change the basic site planning and urban design details. Applicants should identify all required modifications from the original Development Permit submission, at the building permit review stage, to allow the total impact of proposed changes to be assessed. This assessment is not intended for approval of modifications which have already been constructed. Criteria In order to be considered for minor amendment, the following criteria must be met: Proposed modifications must not require any new development variances or increase approved variances. The density as defined in the applicable zoning category of the development must not be increased beyond the level specified in the approved Development Permit. Proposed modifications must not alter elements that were controversial or that attracted considerable discussion from the public, staff, Advisory Design Panel, or Council during the original Development Permit process. 4. Proposed exterior modifications must maintain or enhance the quality of the development and must retain the basic form and character of the development. Modifications should not alter the approved lot coverage, siting, scale, spacing, or configuration of buildings, with the exception of minor changes and additions to buildings to accommodate Building Code or servicing requirements. Approved open space and amenity areas should be maintained; proposed changes to landscaping detail should be minor in nature and of equivalent value to approved plans. 7. Proposed changes to the location and configuration of vehicle access and parking areas should be minor in nature. Proposed modifications must not contravene the applicable Development Permit Area Guidelines and Objectives. BYLAW NO. 6477 - 2007 A bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, Enacts as Follows: This bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Development Procedures Amending Bylaw No. 6477 -2007 2. "Schedule A" is hereby deleted and replaced with Schedules 1 to 8 attached hereto. Section 3, Application, Clause 3) is hereby amended by removing the words "Schedule A" and inserting the words "Schedules A - H as applicable" in their place; 4. Section 3, Application, shall be amended by the addition of the following: (4) Applications for rezoning to a residential, commercial, industrial or institutional zone must be accompanied by: a) an application for a development permit, where a development permit is required for the subdivision or development in respect of which the rezoning is being sought; b) an application for a development variance permit, where a variance of a bylaw is required or proposed for the subdivision or development in respect of which the rezoning is being sought; c) an application for subdivision where the subdivision in respect of which the rezoning is being sought involves the creation of one or more additional lots or where road, lane, walkway or park dedication is proposed or required in connection with the proposed rezoning. (5) Notwithstanding subsection (4) above, staff may recommend an alternative development process to Council for applications covering large areas of land, involving multiple sites and land uses and which are intended to be developed in phases over time. Maple Ridge Development Procedures Amending Bylaw No. 6477 — 2007 Page 2 Section 5, Process shall be amended by the addition of Clause 5 (a) as follows: 5 (a) An application for a Zoning Bylaw amendment shall not be placed before Public Hearing until a subdivision layout for the property, if applicable, has been found technically feasible by staff. For the purpose of this section technically feasible shall mean that a subdivision layout including any park or road dedication has been found to generally comply with the provisions of the Land Title Act, plus all relevant bylaws, regulations and policies of the District of Maple Ridge and that all required services are available and have the capacity to serve the lands. 6. Clause 15 shall be added as follows: 15) Notwithstanding Clause 10 above where no staff or Council action has been taken or where no submission of outstanding or required application materials by the applicant has occurred on a file for any 12 month period, applications for Official Community Plan amendment, Zoning Bylaw amendment, Development Permit or a Development Variance Permit shall be considered inactive and be closed. The applicant shall be notified upon file closure. READ a first time this READ a second time this READ a third time this day of , 2007. day of day of , 2007. , 2007. RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED this day of - LOWW**`"'�"''� DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Schedule 1 MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Development Application Submission Checklist Schedule A OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT Applications for an amendment to the Official Community Plan are to be made to the Planning Department, and must include the following: 1) A completed application form with the prescribed fee. 2) A Certificate of Title and a Consent Form (if the applicant is different from the owner shown on the certificate of title) plus copies of any restrictive covenant documents registered against title to the lands; 3) A Site Profile 4) A written statement describing the amendment and the policy rationale for it. Additional information may also be required as follows: 5) A Traffic Impact Assessment where the land use changes propose ❑ significant density increases, land use impacts or cover large areas of land. 6) A servicing plan and statement as to the availability and adequacy ❑ of major infrastructure components. (sanitary sewer, water supply and storm water management) 7) The surveyed location of the top of bank for all watercourses and the proposed ❑ setback in accordance with District of Maple Ridge bylaws and policy. 8) A geotechnical report in support of the proposed land uses with (� any recommended geotechnical setback line shown on relevant plans. 9) A grading plan where major regarding is proposed or required. ❑ 10) A subdivision layout showing proposed lot lines, roads, lanes, ❑ and park dedication. 11) An Environmental Impact Assessment by a qualified consultant. ❑ Notes: • Staff or Council may require additional information at any time to properly assess the application. • All plans to be in metric scale; • Incomplete applications will not be accepted • A pre -application meeting with staff prior to submission of an application is strongly recommended to assist in identifying issues and expedite processing times. DISTRICT6 2), ova at MAPLE RIDGEPLANNING DEPARTMENT Development Application Submission Checklist Schedule B REZONING APPLICATION (Single Family Fee simple lots) Schedule 2 Applications for rezoning to allow for creation of fee simple single family residential lots are to be made to the Planning Department, and must include the following: 1) A completed application form with the prescribed fee. 2) A Certificate of Title and a Consent Form (if the applicant is different from the owner shown on the certificate of title) plus copies of any restrictive covenant documents registered against title. 3) A Site profile. 4) A written statement describing the proposed development. 5) A subdivision plan showing proposed roads, walkways, lot layout, building envelopes and park dedication. 6) A plan showing bearings and dimensions of any proposed zoning boundaries that do not follow existing lot lines. 7) A Traffic Impact Assessment where the land development proposes a significant density increase, land use impacts or covers large areas of land. 8) A servicing plan and statement as to the availability and adequacy of major infrastructure components. (sanitary sewer, water supply and storm water management) 9) The surveyed location of the top of bank for all watercourses and the proposed setback in accordance with District of Maple Ridge bylaws and policy; 10) A grading plan where major regrading is proposed or required. 11) A tree survey and a report by a Certified Professional Arborist to identify trees that must be removed and establish potential tree retention opportunities and measures to ensure retention; Additional information may also be required as follows: 12) A geotechnical report in support of the proposed development ❑ with any recommended geotechnical setback line shown on the proposed subdivision and building envelope plan; 13) An Environmental Impact Assessment by a qualified consultant; ❑ Additional information is required for lands proposed for R- 3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zoning as follows: 1) Architectural plans drawn to metric scale prepared by a qualified professional in the ❑ design field showing the proposed development on the lots to be created including a site plan, front elevation drawings, front yard landscaping and fencing. 2) A point by point written statement as to how the proposed development ❑ conforms to the Intensive Development Permit Area guidelines. Notes: • Staff or Council may require additional information at any time to properly assess the application; • All plans to be in metric scale; • Incomplete applications will not be accepted; • A pre -application meeting with staff prior to submission of an application is strongly recommended to assist in identifying issues and expedite processing times. -2- 6 2% awztk� ^ DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Schedule 3 MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Development Application Submission Checklist Schedule C REZONING APPLICATION (for other than single family fee simple lots) Applications for Rezoning to a zone that allows other than single family fee simple lots are to be made to the Planning Department, and must include the following: 1) A completed application form with the prescribed fee. 2) A Certificate of Title and a Consent Form (if the applicant is different from the owner shown on the certificate of title) plus copies of any restrictive covenant documents registered against title to the lands; 3) A Site Profile; 4) A written statement describing the proposal or amendment including an assessment as to consistency of the proposal with Official Community Plan policies and guidelines; 5) One set of full sized architectural plans, three sets at l 1x17, one set at 8.5 x 11 and four extra site plans folded. The plans should be drawn to metric scale and sufficient in detail to demonstrate what is being proposed on the site, compliance with development permit area guidelines, the Zoning Bylaw and Building Code. The plans should include: i) A fully dimensioned site plan showing: • Site reconciliation information including lot area, gross floor area, number and area of residential units, lot coverage, density ratio, parking spaces and loading bays required and provided; • Lot dimensions; • Site dimensions and building setbacks; • Location and dimensions of any required road, lane or Parkland dedication; • Location and width of existing or proposed vehicle access to the property showing grade percentages, magazine storage and turning radii; • Location of municipal services and rights of way on or adjacent to the site; • The location and name of any watercourses on or adjacent to the site; • Proposed watercourse protection and geotechnical setbacks applicable to the site; • The location, and size of any surface parking and loading spaces proposed and widths of manoeuvring aisles; • The locations of fire related infrastructure such as the Fire Department access routes and connection, fire alarm panel, sprinkler room and standpipe connections; • The location and design of any recycling bins, garbage enclosures or rooftop equipment screening; • The finish of any exposed underground structure or retaining walls; ii) Elevation drawings; ill) Floor plans dimensioned at a reasonable scale for the size and type of development; iv) Cross sections through the building and site at several locations; v) A fully dimensioned plan of parking areas showing number, size, manoeuvring aisles, extra widths adjoining walls and handicapped spaces where required; vi) Detailed landscape plans showing planting sizes species and location as well as: • The location and details of fencing and retaining structures; • Street tree locations; • Location and design detail for any outdoor recreation structures or public plaza; vii) A Traffic Impact Assessment where the land development proposes a significant density increase, land use impacts or covers large areas of land; viii) A servicing plan and statement as to the availability and adequacy of major infrastructure components; (sanitary sewer, water supply and storm water management) ix) The surveyed location of the top of bank for all watercourses and the proposed setback in accordance with District of Maple Ridge bylaws and policy; x) A grading plan where major regarding is proposed or required. xi) A subdivision layout showing roads, lanes, walkways and park dedication; xii) A tree survey and a report by a Certified Professional Arborist to identify trees that must be removed and establish potential tree retention opportunities and measures to ensure retention; Additional information may also be required as follows: xiii) A geotechnical report in support of the proposed ❑ development with any recommended geotechnical setback line shown on relevant plans; xiv) An Environmental Impact Assessment by a qualified consultant; ❑ xv) A completed Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design ❑ (LEED B.C.) checklist for all proposed projects within the Town Centre area. Notes: • Staff or Council may require additional information at any time to properly assess the application; • All plans to be in metric scale; • Incomplete applications will not be accepted; • A pre -application meeting with staff prior to submission of an application is strongly recommended to assist in identifying issues and expedite processing times. Schedule 4 e), PLANNING DISTRICT OF ''' RIDGE DEPARTMENT Development Application Submission Checklist Schedule D DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION (for other than solely environmental or intensive residential development) Applications for Development Permit are to be made to the Planning Department, and must include the following: 1) A completed application form with the prescribed fee; 2) A Certificate of Title and a Consent Form (if the applicant is different from the owner shown on the certificate of title) plus copies of any restrictive covenants registered against title to the lands; 3) A Site Profile; 4) A written statement describing the proposed development including an assessment as to consistency of the proposal with Official Community Plan Development Permit area guidelines; 5) One set of full sized architectural plans, three sets at l 1x17, one set at 8.5 x 11 and four extra site plans folded. The plans should be drawn to metric scale and sufficient in detail to demonstrate what is being proposed on the site, compliance with development permit area guidelines, the Zoning Bylaw and Building Code. The plans should include: i) Color information to be supplied with the application to the Advisory Design Panel and including: • A coloured perspective drawing, or for minor developments, coloured and rendered elevation drawings and photographs of adjoining existing developments; • Color chips of exterior materials and a material sample board. ii) A fully dimensioned site plan showing: • Site reconciliation information including lot area, gross floor area, number and area of residential units, lot coverage, density ratio, parking spaces and loading bays required and provided; • Lot dimensions; • Site dimensions and building setbacks; • Location and dimensions of any required road, lane or Parkland dedication; • Location and width of existing or proposed access(es) to the property showing grade percentages, magazine storage and turning radii; Location of municipal services and rights of way on or adjacent to the site; • The location and name of any watercourses on or adjacent to the site; + Proposed watercourse protection and geotechnical setbacks applicable to the site; • The location, and size of any surface parking and loading spaces proposed and widths of manoeuvring aisles; • The locations of fire related infrastructure such as the Fire Department access routes, and connection, fire alarm panel, sprinkler room and standpipe connections; • The location and design of any electrical rooms, recycling bins, garbage enclosures or rooftop equipment screening; • The finish of any exposed underground structure or retaining walls. ill) Elevation drawings; iv) Floor plans dimensioned at a reasonable scale for the size and type of development; v) Cross sections through the building and site at several locations; vi) A fully dimensioned plan of parking areas showing number, size, manoeuvring aisles, extra widths adjoining walls and handicapped spaces where required; vii) Detailed landscape plans showing planting sizes, numbers, species and location as well as: a. The location and details of fencing and retaining structures; b. Street tree locations; c. Location and design detail for any outdoor recreation structures or any public plaza; d. Lighting details and pole location, mail and hydro kiosk design details and locations; viii) A Traffic Impact Assessment where the land development proposes a significant density increase, land use impacts or covers large areas of land; ix) A servicing plan and statement as to the availability and adequacy of major infrastructure components; (sanitary sewer, water supply and storm water management) x) The surveyed location of the top of bank for all watercourses and the proposed setback in accordance with District of Maple Ridge bylaws and policy; xi) A grading plan where major re -grading is proposed or required; xii) A subdivision layout showing roads, lanes, walkways and park dedication where a subdivision application has not already been submitted; xiii) A tree survey and a report by a Certified Professional Arborist to identify trees that must be removed and establish potential tree retention opportunities and measures to ensure retention; Additional information may also be required as follows: xiv) A geotechnical report in support of the proposed development ❑ with any recommended geotechnical setback line shown on relevant plans; xv) An Environmental Impact Assessment by a qualified consultant; ❑ xvi) A completed Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED ❑ B.C.) checklist for all proposed projects within the Town Centre. Notes: • Staff or Council may require additional information at any time to properly assess the application; • All plans to be in metric scale; • Incomplete applications will not be accepted; • A pre -application meeting with staff prior to submission of an application is strongly recommended to assist in identifying issues and expedite processing times. -2- Schedule 5 ~Y^ DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Development Application Submission Checklist Schedule E DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT Applications for Development Variance Permit are to be made to the Planning Department, and must include the following: 1) A completed application form with the prescribed fee. 2) A Certificate of Title and a Consent Form (if the applicant is different from the owner shown on the certificate of title). 3) A Site Profile. 4) A written statement describing the proposed variances and the rationale for them. 5) Sufficient plans to properly explain and graphically portray the proposed variance or variances. Notes: • Staff or Council may require additional information at any time to properly assess the application; • All plans to be in metric scale; • A Development Variance Permit cannot vary the use or density of land from that specified in the Zoning Bylaw or a flood plain specification under Section 910 (2) of the Local Government Act; • Incomplete applications will not be accepted; • A pre -application meeting with staff prior to submission of an application is strongly recommended to assist in identifying issues and expedite processing times. Schedule 6 ek LOW0 V*4 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAnE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Development Application Submission Checklist Schedule F WATERCOURSE PROTECTION DEVELOPMENT PERMITS A Watercourse Protection Development Permit (WPDP) is required for all development and building permits within 50 metres of the top of bank from watercourses and wetlands. Applications for a Development Permit within the Watercourse Protection Development Permit Area (WPDPA) are to be made to the Planning Department, and must include the following: 1) A completed application form with the prescribed fee; 2) A Certificate of Title and a Consent Form (if the applicant is different from the owner shown on the certificate of title) plus copies of any restrictive covenant documents registered against title; 3) A Site Profile; 4) A survey that has been prepared by a British Columbia Land Surveyor illustrating the location of the following: i) Top of bank or top of ravine bank delineation for all watercourses and the riparian setback location based on the District's Streamside Setback Map; ii) The boundary of the Watercourse Development Permit Area (50 metres from top of bank); Ili) All existing structures within 50 metres of the top of bank; iv) Existing topographic contours with 1 metre intervals and location of natural slopes > 25%; v) Any hydrological feature including watercourses, drainage channels, wetlands, ponds, wells and active floodplain areas. 5) Plan showing existing and proposed building structures, roads, storm water detention facilities, septic facilities, and discharge points located within the Watercourse Protection Development Permit area. 6) Written input from the environmental consultant as to whether Approvals or Notifications are required and need to be submitted to the appropriate federal or provincial agencies. A meeting may need to be arranged between the relevant agencies and the District to discuss the case. 7) An Environmental Assessment of pre -development site conditions located within the development permit area. This report must be prepared and signed by a qualified environmental consultant. An Environmental Assessment will include a report and map with the location of the following: a. Proposed encroachment into setback areas, the justification for the encroachment, and proposed compensation which must reflect a Net Benefit to the District; b. Size (diameter) and type of significant trees in the WPDPA area greater than 25 cm (8 inches) in diameter to be saved or removed. The report must include recommendations on mitigation measures for the protection of root zones and trees that are to be preserved; c. Enhancement or restoration opportunities within watercourses, wetlands, or within the riparian setback areas including cleanup of garbage and re -planting; d. Significant wildlife habitat features found on the site such as raptor nests wildlife trees, heron rookeries, or significant wildlife corridors; e. Natural topographical or hydro geological features such as rock outcroppings, ravines, or floodplain boundaries where applicable. 8) A copy of Schedule "A" (Attached) signed by the developer/landowner and the environmental consultant and submitted to the District's Planning Department. A final inspection and sign off by the environmental consultant will be required for release of an environmental security deposit. Additional information may be required as follows: 9) A full Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Development Permit Area prepared and/or coordinated by a qualified environmental professional. This requirement will depend on the complexity of the site, the size of the proposed development, and/or the proximity of the site to be protected or environmental sensitivity areas. An EIA will require an environmental inventory as described in Section Three "Environmental Assessment". An EIA will also require that the following additional information is prepared and submitted to the District as outlined below: I. Environmental Impact Assessment An environmental assessment for the proposed development will include an evaluation of the following items: a. A certified arborist report with a tree retention strategy for groves of mature trees or trees > 25cm in diameter. The report must also include information on the location, condition, and removal of danger trees within striking distance of the new lots. Removal of trees must meet the requirements of the current Maple Ridge Tree Protection Bylaw; b. Re -planting and slope stabilization strategy for sparsely vegetated areas or disturbed areas; c. Proposed final slope map that includes proposed lot geometry, structures, and slope categories of (0-15%; 15- 25%, >25%). Slope categories must use contrasting colours; d. Conceptual stormwater management plan that encourages site source controls where possible and meets the requirements of the current municipal Watercourse Protection Bylaw; e. Site design in terms of compatibility with environmentally sensitive areas including wildlife habitat areas, natural features, or greenway recreational corridors. II. Environmental Recommendations Recommendations prepared by a qualified environmental professional for protection, mitigation, or restoration of natural features should include the following information: a. Mitigation measures for the proposed development activity including: • Phasing and timing of development to minimize impacts where possible; • Retention strategy for mature trees and replanting strategy for interim site treatment; ■ Incorporation of municipal Low Impact Development guidelines into the development process for the subdivision, roads, and individual lots that strive to utilize stormwater management site source controls and minimize impervious surfaces. b. Recommendations regarding the adequacy of proposed development plans, including site design and landscaping plans to deal with the following: ■ protection of environmentally sensitive areas or natural features; ■ provision of ecological connectivity or access to recreational greenway corridors; ■ mitigation for identified potential hazards including an action plan for the removal of identified danger trees. c. Evaluation of the need for more detailed technical reports or evaluation by a qualified professional for potential hazards including geotechnical, bio- engineering, or flooding related concerns. 10) A more detailed technical report prepared by a qualified professional to evaluate and prepare recommendations on specific issues including potential geotechnical hazards, hydro geological issues, or trail connectivity where necessary. ❑ 11) For developments proposing 25 or more units, for multi phase developments, or at the discretion of the Director of Planning, a report on Post Construction Environmental Monitoring Duties prepared by the developer and the engineer of record to help determine the adequacy of the existing and/or proposed facilities. ❑ 12) A Restoration and Maintenance Agreement along with a security deposit for DP areas where restoration or enhancement related works are required including removal of hazard trees. Replanting plans shall be carried out in accordance with District of Maple Ridge Re - vegetation and Maintenance Guidelines ❑ Notes: • Survey plans should include one set of full size plans and two sets of reduced (11"x17") plans suitable for reproduction. An electronic copy of the plans in CAD or GIS compatible format may be required by the District. • Grade changes over 0.50 metres will require a Building Permit as defined in the Building Bylaw. • Environmental security may be taken as a condition of issuance. • Staff or Council may require additional information at any time to properly assess the application; • All plans to be in metric scale; • Incomplete applications will not be accepted; • A pre -application meeting with staff prior to submission of an application is strongly recommended to assist in identifying issues and expedite processing times. SCHEDULE"A" ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES TO: District of Maple Ridge DATE: ATTENTION: Development Permit Application N W e/I confirm that we/I have been retained (Environmental Monitor's name) By for the District Project No. (Developer's name printed) to provide inspection, assessment, and reporting services in accordance with the requirements of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit. This includes the requirement to ensure compliance with the following: 1) Prior to any clearing and/or disturbance to the site, the Development Permit Area must be inspected by the environmental monitor to ensure all protective controls and mitigation measures are installed/constructed in accordance with municipal requirements found within the current Watercourse Protection Bylaw and the approved environmental Development Permit. A final inspection and written confirmation by the environmental monitor is required that provides assurance all environmental requirements have been adequately addressed and completed. 2) Development and construction plans must incorporate the low impact development guidelines. See Attachment on "Low Impact Development Guidelines". The professionals of record for the site are responsible for providing recommendations on how and when these guidelines can be incorporated into the development plans. 3) To prevent damage or destruction to protected areas and natural features, it is the responsibility of the developer and the qualified environmental professional (QEP) to ensure protective fencing and markers have been placed around protected areas, natural features, or infiltration areas for protection. Where encroachment and degradation of vegetation within a setback or protected area occurs or where vegetation has been removed from a non developable area, the QEP must prepare a restoration or replanting plan for the District of Maple Ridge. 4) The qualified environmental professional/monitor must have unconditional authority from Developer to modify and/or halt any construction activity necessary to ensure compliance with municipal environmental regulations. Environmental Monitor: Signature: Company: Address: Emergency Contact Phone Number Name: Owner/Developer: In executing this Letter of Appointment I covenant that I have authority to and do hereby unconditionally authorize the named qualified environmental professional to modify or halt any construction activity as necessary to ensure compliance with Watercourse Protection Development Permit and the Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection Bylaw 6410-2006. Signature: Print Name: Irs TOP OP BANK (T-0.E3-) OR v LOG RAIL TOP 80CFRAVINE BANK 3y LS, kE FENCE 0 D REQUIRED SETBACK AREA SHOWN IN METRES FROM T.O.B. """'S "U" U U-) :j� <A -T . Tr �,;ATJRIES ----- -------- ..... . E REIAINED < lEv,CRAfy F-ROILCTIfE FENC= I ~r (SLOPES WtL 51LK THAN 25 PRCFOSED PROPOSED DRAtNAGF --LOW DIRECTION -zXF1'--RATION AREA 7�- ------------- ------------ - ------- --- -------------- :i L-STORkfWATEER SWALE MANIENT OR TEVPO RARY RETENTION POND L----- -- ------ J ---------- I Sec Watercourse Protection Development Permit (WODPA) Information C-ecklist Attachment 2. Apoiiccnts mus*, ccmDly with WPDPA or,-- Watercourse Protection By�aw requirements, Ugitci information may be required from aDplico^ts that is compatible with the Distlr'ct's CIS 0-d CAD systems- N CORPORATION OF THE WATERCOURSE PROTECTION DD DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE SAMPLE VA-� 70 Q MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACCOMPANY APPLICAT10k i--p-W 12 Spt-b�, 1874 NT, DRAWN fll: RG DAT!-: Jon. 3* Schedule 7 Development Application Submission Checklist Schedule G NATURAL FEATURES DEVELOPMENT PERMITS The Natural Features Development Permit Area (NFDPA) is established for the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment. It is also established for the protection of development from hazardous conditions. Applications for a Development Permit within the Natural Features Development Permit Area are to be made to the Planning Department. A Natural Features Development Permit NFDP is required to be secured before any clearing, grading, or construction activity begins within the development permit area and before any subdivision of the lands. The following information is required: 1) A completed application form with the prescribed fee; 2) A Certificate of Title and a Consent Form (if the applicant is different from the owner shown on the certificate of title) plus copies of any restrictive covenant documents registered against title; 3) A Site Profile; 4) Two hard copies and one digital copy of a survey plan that has been prepared by a British Columbia Land Surveyor illustrating the location of the following: i) Areas found within the Floodplain boundary shown on Schedule "C" to the Official Community Plan (OCP), or areas on site located within 50 metres from a designated Conservation area; ii) Watercourse Protection Development Permit Area setback boundary where applicable; iii) Existing topographic contours with 1 metre intervals; iv) Existing structures and roads; v) Existing slopes on the site greater than 15%. 5) Location of existing or proposed buildings, structures, roads, septic or drainage facilities, as well as any rights of way, easements, or restrictive covenants. 6) An Environmental Assessment of pre -development site conditions located within the development permit area. The assessment must be prepared and signed by a qualified environmental consultant. An Environmental Assessment will include a report and map with the location of the following: a. Areas where the proposed development is going to require cutting, grading, or alteration of natural slopes > 15% up to 25% or > 25%. Slope categories shall be shown using contrasting colours; b. Size (diameter) and type of significant trees in the NFDPA area greater than 25 cm (8 inches) in diameter to be saved or removed. The report must include recommendations on mitigation measures for the protection of root zones and trees that are to be preserved; c. Enhancement or restoration opportunities within the natural features development permit area including the cleanup of refuse, re -planting, or slope stabilization measures; d. Significant wildlife habitat features found on the site such as raptor nests, wildlife trees, large mammal dens, or significant wildlife corridors; e. Potential hazards on the site including unstable slopes, erosion areas, or floodplain areas; f. Natural topographical or hydrological features such as rock outcroppings, ridgelines, cliffs, water bodies, or floodplain boundaries where applicable. 7) A copy of Schedule "A" (attached) signed by the developer/landowner and the environmental consultant. A final inspection and sign off by the environmental consultant will be required for release of an environmental security deposit. Additional information may be required as follows: 8) A full Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Development Permit Area prepared and/or coordinated by a qualified environmental professional. This requirement will depend on the complexity of the site, the size of the proposed development, and/or the proximity of the site to protected or environmental sensitivity areas. ❑ An EIA will require an environmental inventory as described in Section Three "Environmental Assessment". An EIA will also require that the following additional information is prepared and submitted to the District as outlined below: I. Environmental Impact Assessment An environmental assessment for the proposed development will include an evaluation of the following items: a. An arborist report with a tree retention strategy for groves of mature trees or trees > 25cm in diameter. The report must also include information on the location, condition, and removal of danger trees within striking distance of the site. Removal of trees must meet the requirements of the current Maple Ridge Tree Protection Bylaw; b. Re -planting and slope stabilization strategy for sparsely vegetated areas or disturbed proposed slope areas > 15%; c. Proposed final slope map with proposed lot geometry, structures, and slope categories of (0-15%; 15- 25%, >25%) Slope categories must use contrasting colours; d. Conceptual stormwater management plan that encourages site source controls where possible and meet requirements of the current municipal Watercourse Protection Bylaw; e. Site design in terms of compatibility with environmentally sensitive areas including wildlife habitat areas and wildlife or greenway corridors. -2- II. Environmental Recommendations Recommendations prepared by a qualified environmental professional for protection, mitigation, or restoration of natural features should include the following information: a. Mitigation measures for the proposed development activity including: ■ Phasing and timing of development to minimize impacts where possible. • Retention strategy for mature trees and replanting strategy for interim site treatment • Incorporation of municipal Low Impact Development guidelines into the development process for the subdivision, roads, and individual lots that strive to utilize stormwater management site source controls and minimize impervious surfaces. b. Recommendations regarding the adequacy of proposed development plans, including site design and landscaping plans to deal with the following: ■ protection of environmentally sensitive areas or natural features, • provision of ecological connectivity or access to recreational greenway corridors ■ mitigation for identified potential hazards including an action plan for the removal of identified danger trees. c. Evaluation of the need for more detailed technical report by a qualified professional for potential hazards including geotechnical, bio-engineering, or flooding related concerns. 9) A more detailed technical assessment and report prepared by a qualified professional for addressing impacts and recommendations for specific issues such as potential hazards, hydro geological concerns, or wildlife habitat assessments. The details of the study will depend on the complexity of the site, the size of the development, and/or the environmental sensitivity of the site. 10) For large scale or multi phase developments, a report on Post Construction Environmental Monitoring Duties prepared by the developer and the engineer of record to help determine the adequacy of the existing and/or proposed facilities. ❑ 11) A Restoration and Maintenance Agreement along with a security deposit for DP areas where restoration or enhancement related works are required including removal of hazard trees. Replanting plans shall be carried out in accordance with District of Maple Ridge Re -vegetation and Maintenance Guidelines. El Notes: • Survey plans should include one set of full size plans and two sets of reduced (I I "x 17") plans suitable for reproduction. An electronic copy of the plans in CAD or GIS compatible format may be required by the District. • Environmental security may be taken as a condition of issuance • Grade changes over 0.50 metres will require a Building Permit as defined in the Building Bylaw. • Staff or Council may require additional information at any time to properly assess the application; • All plans to be in metric scale; • Incomplete applications will not be accepted; • A pre -application meeting with staff prior to submission of an application is strongly recommended to assist in identifying issues and expedite processing times. -3- J SCHEDULE "A" ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES TO: District of Maple Ridge ATTENTION: Natural Features Development Permit Application No. W e/I (Environmental Monitor's name) by (Developer's name printed) confirm that we/I have been retained for the District Project No. to provide inspection, assessment, and reporting services in accordance with the requirements of the Natural Features Development Permit. This includes the requirement to ensure compliance with the following: 1) Prior to any clearing and/or disturbance to the site, the Development Permit Area must be inspected by the environmental monitor to ensure all protective controls and mitigation measures are installed/constructed in accordance with municipal requirements found within the current Watercourse Protection Bylaw and the approved environmental Development Permit. A final inspection and written confirmation by the environmental monitor is required that provides assurance all environmental requirements have been adequately addressed and completed. 2) Development and construction plans must incorporate the low impact development guidelines. See Schedule "A" Low Impact Development Guidelines. The professionals of record for the site are responsible for providing recommendations on how and when these guidelines can be incorporated into the development plans. 3) To prevent damage or destruction to protected areas and natural features, it is the responsibility of the developer and the qualified environmental professional (QEP) to ensure protective fencing and markers have been placed around protected areas, natural features, or infiltration areas for protection. Where encroachment and degradation of vegetation within a setback or protected area occurs or where vegetation has been removed from a non developable area, the QEP must prepare a restoration or replanting plan for the District of Maple Ridge. 4) The qualified environmental professional/monitor must have unconditional authority from Developer to modify and/or halt any construction activity necessary to ensure compliance with municipal environmental regulations. Environmental Monitor: Signature: Company: Address: Emergency Contact Phone Number Name: Owner/Developer: In executing this Letter of Appointment I covenant that I have authority to and do hereby unconditionally authorize the named qualified environmental professional to modify or halt any construction activity as necessary to ensure compliance with Natural Features Development Permit and the Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection Bylaw 6410-2006. Signature: Print Name: st TOP OF BANK (T OB.) OR TOP Or RAVINE BANK LOG RAIL (BY BCLS) E FENCE Vv, REOUIRED SETBACK AREA SHOWN 0; IN METRES FROM T.O.B. < .-T NATERAL F-zATURfS 70 E RETAINED STORMWA7---R SWALE 0 L- 4 TEmDORAFY PROTECTI+f-r FENCE (SLOPES GREA-ER iHAI 25 PRCPOSED PROPCS-ED DRXNAGE FLOW DIRECTION NFI-TRATIO',' AND/OR ----------- 40— zXFIL-RATION AREA Trl -RC!'OSF SLA3-,XVlS14/Rok,)S 1 0 PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY RETENTION POND -- ---------- ------------ ------ fp Tf`�. 1. See Wc*,ercoursc Protection DeveloDmer' Perr-iit (WPDPA) Information Cncckl:st Attachment 2. Appliccnts must, ccmply with WPDPA and Wotercourse Protection Byiow requirements. 3. D4tcl information moy be required from cppllcontc, that is compatible with the District's CIS o-d CAD systems- N CORPORATION OF THE WATERCOURSE PROTECTION DP DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE SAIV.P[--r MAP 7C) MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT %CAL- ACCOMPANY APPLICATICN, l.cwp—td 12 Sept—b-, 1874 N.T.S. i PRAWN BY: RO IDATE: ion 3% 2007 I FILE: Schedule 8 �1 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAXLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Development Application Submission Checklist Schedule H TEMPORARY INDUSTRIAL OR TEMPORARY COMMERCIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Applications for Temporary Industrial or Temporary Commercial Use Permits are to be made to the Planning Department, and must include the following: 1) A completed application form with the prescribed fee; 2) A Certificate of Title and a Consent Form (if the applicant is different from the owner shown on the certificate of title) plus copies of any restrictive covenant documents registered against title; 3) A Site Profile; 4) A written statement describing the proposal or and the rationale for it; 5) Sufficient plans and written information to properly explain and graphically portray improvements proposed with the temporary use including but not limited to: • Plans of any new buildings or building renovations; • Parking, loading and access provisions; • Details of the proposed use and hours of operation; • Details of any material storage; • The locations of fire related infrastructure such as the Fire Department access routes and connection, fire alarm panel, sprinkler room, and standpipe connections; • Information as to whether the proposed use will discharge or emit odorous, noxious, or toxic matter or vapours, heat, glare, noise or reoccurring ground vibrations; • Details of the size and number of vehicle movements to and from the site; • Drainage plans that indicate the method of storm water disposal and any required detention or retention facilities; • Erosion and sediment control plans that indicate the method to be used to prevent the release of sediment into any ravine, watercourse or storm sewer. Notes: • Staff or Council may require additional information at any time to properly assess the application. • All plans to be in metric scale; • Incomplete applications will not be accepted • A pre -application meeting with staff prior to submission of an application is strongly recommended to assist in identifying issues and expedite processing times. BY-LAW NO.5879-1999 PAGE 5 �•a 1 i MUM."11313' Required Attachments A. A Certificate of Title to verify ownership and legal description of property(ies). B. A Consent.Form or valid Option to Purchase , if the applicant is different from the registered owner shown on the Certificate of Title. C. A legal survey of the property(ies). D. One set of full size architectural blue prints and one set of reduced (81/2"xl 1 ") plans suitable for reproduction must be submitted of the following: i) fully dimensioned site plan (drawn to scale) showing: • lot dimensions site dimensions and yard setbacks ® location and dimensions of required road dedication • location and width of existing or proposed access(es) to the property snowing grade percentages and turning radius ® location of any existing municipal services and rights of way on the site or adjacent site ® the name and location of watercourses on or adjacent to the property ® the proposed watercourse protection setbacks as measured from the top of bank of all watercourses -.. -� ,, 1 1 1 1 n) neighbourhood context plan showing relationship to surrounding area iu) building elevations 4+ iv) preliminary architectural plans m+ v) detailed landscape plan + E. Additional information to be provided with the set of plans referred to in 'B" above: i) Land contours before and after lot grading for the subject property and for 15-30 metres extending into adjacent properties. Contours are to be shown at 0.5 metre intervals and finished grades are to be shown for every 0.5 metre elevation change; u) The size location and number of on -site parking and loading spaces, and refuse enclosures; in) Finished first floor elevations for the proposed buildings on the site; iv) Proposed road centrelines at intersections and changes in gradient measured at 15 metre intervals; v) Geotechnical information may be required to verify the buildability of specific proposals; vi) Site plans must include the following Zoning Bylaw compliance calculations as they apply to the proposal: lot area; floor area; lot coverage; number of units, density, parking (required and actual), and loading (required and actual). F. Professionally prepared elevation drawings for the four sides of the proposed development including design, materials and finish. G. One set of professionally prepared color architectural rendering drawings and one set of reduced (81/2"xl 1 ") plans suitable for reproduction that depict the design, finish and color of the proposed buildings, landscaping detail and signage location. H. For all Commercial, Industrial and Institutional developments, professionally prepared signage plans that includes the location, dimensions, elevations total sign area and specification of materials, finish and color. Additional information to be provided with the set of Landscape Plans referred to in "B" above: i) Location and height of proposed landscape screening; n) Proposed street tree location; in) Location and design detail for preschooler play equipment, referred to as Tot Lots; and iv) Fencing detail and location, lighting details and pole location, mail and hydro kiosk design details and locations. These items are not required for single-family residential applications These items are not required for two-family residential applications z As required under Development Permit Area XXX of the Official Community Plan BY-LAW NO. 5879-1999 PAGE 7 J. Drainage Plans that indicate method of stormwater disposal and any required detention, retention facilities. K. Erosion and Sediment Control Plans that indicate the method to be used to prevent the release of sediment into any ravine, watercourse or storm sewer. + These items are not required for single-family residential applications These items are not required for two-family residential applications z As required under Development Permit Area XXX of the Official Community Plan June 25, 2002 cmem District of Maple Ridge TO: I Its \i orship ,'\Iav-or Gordon Robson DATE: June 13, ?UO' and 'dembers of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief _AdministratIN-c Officer ATTN: SUBJECT: ''ti()6 _Annual Report and 2U06 Statement of Financial Information EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Hie ?()U6 \nnual Report has been prepared in accordance «with Section 98 of the Community Charter and \Iunicipal Council is required to form -ill'\- receive this report before June 3011�. _A major component of the report is the 2006 _Audited Financial Statements. These statements were presented to the Finance & .Audit Committee and to Municipal Council at meetings that were open to the public. The 2006 _Annual Report will be submitted to the Government Finance Officers _Association for consideration for the Canadian _Award for financial Reporting, au award the: District has received for the past sixteen \,cars. l 'nder the Financial Information _Act, the: District is required to file a Statement of Financial Information «-ith the Province of British Columbia prior to June 3011' each Near. This report must be approved b\- Council and the statuton- Financial Officer. RECOMMENDATION(S): That the 2006 Annual Report be received as required by the Community Charter. That the Statement of Financial Information be approved as required by the Financial Information Act. DISCUSSION: The 2006 _Anrnta] Report has been prepared in accordance with Section 98 of the Community Charter. �s required in the Charter, the report contains our _Audited financial Statement~: a Progress Report detailing municipal objectives and progress toward their achievement; information about the scn-ices provided by \Itinicipal Departments: and lists the Permissi\ e lax 1"xemptions awarded for the 2006 fiscal \ car. The report \vas av-ailable for public inspection on June 12 and notice posted in the local newspaper as required bv- Section 94 of the Charter indicating that the report is being presented at the Council meeting of June 26,11. The District of NIapIc Ridge has been a recipient of the Canadian _Award for Financial Reporting for the past sixteen years. This ,nvard is presented b\- the Government 1'inance Officers \ssociatio❑ (C I U AI to recognize ,'Municipalities that publish high quality Financial reports that are easily readable, efficiently - organized and clearly- communicate the g(werument's financial picture_ Tlic 20U6 _Annual Report will be submitted to the GFO-A for consideration for this N-ear's award. In addition to the _Annual Report required bN- the Conununito- Charter, the District of Maple Ridge is required to publish an annual Statement of Financial Information (S(kT under the I=inancial Information _Act I11is report must be apprm'cd bv- Council and the statutory- financial Officer, and filed vvuli the Prop trace of Briush Columbia prior to June 30, 2007. I'lte S01"I is attached for your review and approval. The package contains 1 completed checklist 2 A Statement of _lssets & Liabilities 31 .An Operational Statement 41 \ Schedule of Debt �? 1 Schedule of Remuneration and Fxpenses 6 \ Statenicrit of Scverancc .\greemctits \ Schedule of Disbursements to supplies of ;goods or scrvices 5 Notes to the 1�inancial Statements 9 _A Statement of Change in Financial Position lt) :\ Managctnent Report I I .A Statement of .\pproY-al of the financial information submitted. Citizen/Customer Implications: hhe :Annual Report and the SOFT provride: additional information to the residents of ;Maple Ridge and the �.?eneral public, contributing to Council'", commitment to open government. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to Jutie 30111 of each Year Council is required to receive the District's .Annual Report in accordance with n Sectio9h of the Community- Charter and is also required to approve the Statement of Financial Information in accordance with the Financial Information _Act. It should be noted that detailed presentations oil our ?OO6 I'inancial Statements -,Y-cre done at both the Finance & _Audit Committee and at regularly scheduled Council meeting, both of which were open to the public. I'hc ?()()6 \mzual Report and the: 2006 Statement of Financial Information are attached to this report. N� tnra�i b): Catherine Nolan, CCr_A Manager of _Accounting 1F/ r rrz i51': Paul Gill, BB.A, C;C7:A General Malta'(Yer_, Cotpxnacc acid 1 inaricial Services J.L. fQim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Financial information Act Financial Information Regulation (FIR), Schedule 1 Statement of Financial Information (SOFT) Index to FIR Schedule 1 and the Checklist Page 1: Corporation Information Ministry Information General: Section One 1(1)(a) Statement of assets and liabilities 1(1)(b) Operational statement 1(1)(c) Schedule of debts 1(1)(d) Schedule of guarantee and indemnity agreements 1(1)(e) Schedule of employee remuneration and expenses 1(1)(f) Schedule of suppliers of goods and services 1(2) [Explanatory information for reference] 1(3) Statements prepared on a consolidated basis or for each fund 1(4) & (5) Notes to the statements and schedules in section 1(1) Page 2: Statement of Assets & Liabilities: Section Two 2 Balance sheet Changes in equity and surplus or deficit Operational Statement: Section Three 3(1) Statement of Income / Statement of Revenue and Expenditures Statement of Changes in Financial Position 3(2) & (3) Omission of Statement of Changes in Financial Position, with explanation 3(4) Requirement for community colleges, school districts and municipalities Statement of Debts: Section Four 4(1)(a) & 4(2) List and detail the schedule of long-term debts 4(1)(b) Identify debts covered by sinking funds / reserves 4(3) & (4) Omission of schedule, with explanation Page 3: Schedule of Guarantee and Indemnity Agreements: Section Five 5(1) List agreements under the Guarantees and Indemnities Regulation 5(2) State the entities and amounts involved 5(3) & (4) Omission of schedule, with explanation Page 3 & 4: Schedule of Remuneration and Expenses: Section Six 6(1) [Definitions for reference] 6(2)(a) List remuneration / expenses for each elected official, member of board, Cabinet appointees 6(2)(b) List each employee with remuneration exceeding $75,000, plus expenses 6(2)(c) Consolidated total for all employees with remuneration of $75,000 or less 6(2)(d) Reconcile difference in total remuneration above with operational statement 6(3) Exclude personal information other than as required Index 1 Page 3 & 4: Schedule of Remuneration and Expenses: Section Six (continued) 6(4) & (5) [Explanatory information for reference] 6(6) Report employer portion of El and CPP as a supplier payment 6(7)(a) & (b) Statement of severance agreements 6(8) Explain an omission of statement of severance agreements 6(9) [Statement of severance agreements to minister — not required unless requested] Page 4: Schedule of Suppliers of Goods or Services: Section Seven 7(1)(a) List suppliers receiving payments exceeding $25,000 7(1)(b) Consolidated total of all payments of $25,000 or less 7(1)(c) Reconcile difference in total above with operational statement 7(2)(a) [Explanatory information for reference] 7(2)(b) Statement of payments of grants or contributions 7(2)(c) [Explanatory information for reference] Page 5: Inactive Corporations: Section Eight 8(1) Ministry to report for inactive corporations 8(2)(a) Contents of report — statements and schedules under section 1(1) to extent possible 8(2)(b) Contents of report — operational status of corporation Approval of Financial Information: Section Nine 9(1) Approval of SOFI for corporations (other than municipalities) 9(2) Approval of SOFT for municipalities 9(3) Management report 9(4) Management report must explain roles and responsibilities 9(5) Signature approval is for all contents of the SOFT Access to the Financial Information: Section Ten 10(1) to (3) [Explanatory information for reference] Index 2 Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1 Checklist — Statement of Financial Information (SOFT) For the Corporation: Corporate Name: Corporation of the District of Contact Name: Catherine Nolan Maple Ridge Fiscal Year End- December 31, 2006 Phone Number: 604-467-7316 Date Submitted: June 25,2007 E-mail: cnolan@mapleridge.com For the Ministry: Ministry Name: Date Received: Date Reviewed: Approved (SFO)- Distribution: Legislative Library Reviewer: Deficiencies: Deficiencies Addressed Further Action Taken: Ministry Retention 77 Yes No Yes j No FIR Schedule 1 Item Yes No N/A Comments Section General 1 (1) (a) Statement of assets and liabilities X Statement A r � Schedule 1 1 (1) (b) Operational statement X Statement B - 1 (1) (c) Schedule of debts - - — X ( Schedule 2 1 (1) (d) Schedule of guarantee and X NIL Report p indemnity agreements 1 (1 e )( ) Schedule of employee remuneration X and expenses 1 (1) (f) ; Schedule of suppliers of goods and X services I 1 (3) I Statements � prepared on a X Statements A & B consolidated basis or for each fund, as appropriate 1 (A) � Notes to the financial statements for j 1 (5) j the statements and schedules listed X above I FIR Item Yes No N/A Comments Schedule 1 Section Statement of Assets & Liabilities 2 A balance sheet prepared in X accordance with GAAP or stated accounting principles / policies, and • Show changes in equity and surplus or deficit due to X operations Operational Statement Statement A Statement B 3 (1) Prepared in accordance with GAAP X or stated accounting principles / policies and consists of: • a Statement of Income or Statement B Statement of Revenue and Expenditures, and • a Statement of Changes in j Statement C Financial Position 3 (2) The Statement of Changes in X 3 (3) Financial Position may be j omitted if it provides no additional information • The omission must be explained in the notes i 3 (4) 1 Community colleges, school districts, X i Statement 2 and municipalities must prepare a Statement of Changes in Financial Position for the Capital Fund Schedule of Debts 4 (1) (a) List each long-term debt (secured by X 4 (2) debentures, mortgages, bonds, etc.), stating the amount outstanding, the interest rate, and the maturity date 4 (1) (b) Identify debts covered by sinking 1 X funds or reserves and amounts in these accounts 4 (3) • The schedule may be omitted if 4 (4) addressed under section 2 or 5 and it provides no additional information • The omission must be explained in a note to the schedule 0 Schedule 2 Schedule 2 2 FIR Schedule 1 Item Yes No N/A Comments Section j Schedule of Guarantee and Indemnity Agreements i 5 (1) List financial agreements that X required government approval prior f to being given (see Guarantees and r Indemnities Regulation in FIA Guidance Package) 5 (2) State the entities involved, and the X specific amount involved if known ! 5 (3) • The schedule may be omitted if X 5 (4) addressed under section 2 or 4 1 and it provides no additional information • The omission must be explained in a note to the schedule ! i ! I Schedule of Remuneration and Expenses (See Guidance Package for suggested format) 6 (2) (a) List separately, by name and X I position, the total remuneration and the total expenses for each elected official, member of the board of directors, and employee appointed by Cabinet ! 6 (2)b List alphabetically each employee i X � whose total remuneration exceeds $75,000 and the total expenses for each [excluding the persons listed under 6 (2) (a)] r 6 (2) (c) Include a consolidated total for i X employees whose remuneration is $75,000 or less [excluding the persons listed under 6 (2) (a)] 6 (2) (d) Reconcile or explain any difference X between total remuneration in this schedule and related information in the operational statement i 6 (3) Exclude personal information other X i than name, position, function or remuneration and expenses of employees -- - FIR Schedule 1 Item Yes No N/A Comments Section Schedule of Remuneration and Expenses (See Guidance Package for suggested format) 6 (6) Report the employer portion of El X and CPP as a supplier payment to the Receiver General for Canada rather than as employee remuneration j I 6 (7) (a) Include a statement of severance X 6 (7) (b) agreements providing: I • the number of severance agreements under which payment commenced in the fiscal year being reported on for non -union employees, and • the range of equivalent months' compensation for them (see Guidance Package for suggested format) i 6 (8) Provide the reason for omitting a i I X statement of severance agreements in a note to the schedule of remuneration and expenses i Schedule of Suppliers of Goods or Services (See Guidance Package for suggested format) 7 (1) (a) List in alphabetical order all suppliers I X of goods and services who received aggregate payments exceeding $25,000 7 (1) (b) Include a consolidated total of all X payments to suppliers who received $25,000 or less 7 (1) (c) Reconcile or explain any difference X between the consolidated total and related figures in the operational statement 7 (2) (b) Include a statement of payments for X the purposes of grants or " contributions FIR Schedule 1 Item Yes No N/A Comments Section Inactive Corporations 8 (1) The ministry reports for the corporation if the corporation is not operating to the extent required to produce a SOFT X j 8 (2) (a) The ministry's report contains the y p X statements and schedules required under section 1 (1), to the extent possible 8 (2) (b) The ministry's report contains a ( X i statement of the operational status of the corporation (see Guidance j Package regarding what to include) Approval of Financial Information 9 (1) Corporations other than X municipalities — the SOFT is signed as approved by the board of directors or the governing body (see Guidance Package for example) 1 9 (2) Municipalities — the SOFT is X approved by its council and by the officer assigned responsibility for financial administration (see Guidance Package for example) 9 (3) A management report is included, X signed by the head and chief financial officer, or by the municipal officer assigned responsibility for financial administration (see examples in annual report at http://www.gov.bc.ca/cas/popt/) 9 (4) The management report explains the X roles and responsibilities of the board of directors or governing body, audit committee, management, and the auditors 9 (5) Signature approvals required in )( section 9 are for each of the statements and schedules of financial information, not just the financial statements a Statement A The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Consolidated Statement of Financial Position As at December 31, 2006 Financial Assets Cash and temporary investments (note 1) Portfolio investments (note 1) Accounts receivable (note 2) Recoverable local improvements (note 3) Other assets (note 7) Liabilities Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 5) Deferred revenues Restricted revenue (schedule 7) Refundable performance deposits and other Employee future benefits (note 8) Mortgage liability (note 9) Debenture debt (note 6, schedule 2) Net Financial Assets (Debt) f PAOUII, CGA General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services 2006 2005 $ 28,066,766 $ 32,540,017 67,030,331 49,985,738 15,355,354 10,279,008 814,774 1,382,647 611,828 1,000,530 111,879,053 95,187,940 10,299,934 8,425,253 6,678,982 5,004,596 36,699,742 27,252,397 2,631,336 2,099,223 3,915,400 3,587,774 - 16,726,326 47,737,412 33,051,518 107,962,806 96,147,087 $ 3,916,247 $ (959,147) Gordon W, Robso Mayor, District of Maple Ridge a) The notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of -this statement b) Contingencies, Commitments and Unrecognized Liabilities (Note 10) Annual Report 2006 — District of Maple Ridge Schedule 1 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Schedule of Property and Equipment As at December 31, 2006 General Capital Fund 2006 2005 Public Works: Roads and bridges $ 152,066,008 $ 140,042,085 Drainage 55,141,679 52,029,557 Sidewalks 12,888,689 11,954,104 Equipment 6,320,331 6,425,808 Landscaping and other 5,410,607 1,680,411 Supplies inventory 1,019,973 68,217 Funded work in process 109,322 6,535,877 232,956,609 218,736,059 General Government: Land 5,381,610 5,381,610 Buildings and equipment 31,081,170 34,565,600 Funded work in process 202,028 172,634 36,664,808 40,119,844 Protective: Fireballs and equipment 9,759,174 9,749,300 Police buildings and equipment 3,635,215 3,539,993 Search and Rescue 163,080 163,080 Funded work in process 1,898,141 511,825 15,455,610 13,964,198 Parks and Recreation: Parks and playgrounds 33,699,503 30,591,962 Recreation facilities and equipment 63,675,933 63,542,456 Funded work in process 1,561,603 485,846 98,937,039 94,620,264 Other Public and environmental health 2,688,431 2,485,295 Total General Capital Fund 386,702,497 369,925,660 Water Supply System Capital Fund Supplies inventory 129,408 126,899 Land 122,261 122,261 Waterlines 55,143,736 51,974,550 Funded work in process 1,000,903 331,623 Total Water Supply System Capital Fund 56,396,308 52,555,333 Sanitary Sewer Capital Fund Supplies inventory 44,897 76,139 Land 12,049 12,049 Sewer lines 63,839,526 60,154,641 Funded work in process 358,758 _ 652,857 Total Sanitary Sewer Capital Fund 64.255,230 60,895,686 Work in Process Unfunded work in process - 1,393,112 Total S 507,354,035 S 484,769,791 fvnnual Report 2000 District of Maple Ridge 29 % The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Statement B Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 Actual Budget Actual 2006 2006 2005 Revenue Taxes (schedule 3) Real property, special assessments, grants in lieu S 75,308,285 Less: Collections for other authorities 33,086.948 Taxes for municipal purposes 42,221,337 42,343,437 38,946,352 User fees and other revenue (schedule 4) 24,568,587 22,930,485 22,337,116 Development revenue (schedule 5) 5,065,681 13,744,461 4,667,930 Senior government transfers (schedule 6) 2,487,939 3,456,888 2,291,237 Interest and investment income Investment income 1,991,210 Interest income 1,317,446 Less: Deferred amount (852,782) 2,455,874 2,455,874 1,794,996 2,271,515 Asset disposal proceeds and other gains 525,221 - 725,244 Contributed subdivision infrastructure 10,848,250 10,848,250 26,284,692 88,172,889 95,118,517 97,524,086 Expenditures (statements 1 and 2) Protective services Transportation services Recreation and cultural Water utility Sewer utility General government Planning, public health and other Increase in allowance for investments Subdivision infrastructure Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue over Expenditures Principal Repaid (net of refinancing) Debt Issued Increase in Fund Balances Fund Balances Beginning of the Year Fund Balances End of the Year 19,173,524 29,533,968 16,387,421 9,406,722 16,451, 894 10,023,304 17,872,291 21,845,722 15,419,618 7,684,719 9,253,603 6,962,383 5,981,985 8,274,568 6,258,777 9,553,553 11,798,807 10,597,951 2,607,170 3,651,778 2,293,164 169,283 - - 10,848,250 10,848,250 26,284,692 83,297,497 111,658,590 94,227,310 4,875,392 (16,540,073) 3,296,776 (2,398,105) (2,338,296) (1,982,224) 357,675 - 2,834,962 (18,878,369) 1,314,552 48,818,697 48,818,697 47,504,145 S 51,653,659 S 29,940,328 $ 48,818,697 a) The notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement b) Contingencies, Commitments and Unrecognized Liabilities (Note 10) Annual Repoi t 2000 District of Maple Ridge 7 Segment Report The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Consolidated Report of Segmented Revenue and Expenditure As at December 31, 2006 Revenue Tax revenues (schedule 3) Senior government transfers (schedule 6) Development revenue (schedule 5) Other revenues (schedule 4) Disposal proceeds and refinancing gains Investment income Internal recoveries Contributions for subdivision infi-astructure Total Revenue Expenditures Operating (schedules 11,9,13,12,10,8) Goods and services Labour costs Debt Servicing Increase in investment allowance Capital (statement 2) Contributed subdivision infrastructure Total Expenditures Excess(Deficiency) revenue over expenditure Principal Payments New debt issued Increase (Decrease) in fund balances Protective Services 2006 2006 2005 Actual Budget Actual $ - $ - S - 889,766 805,521 784,381 - 24,598 18,445 3,813,252 3,208,566 3,192,558 4,703,018 4,038,685 3,995,384 1.1,317,475 12,068,987 11,016,547 6,461,992 6,622,863 4,959,088 17,779,467 18,691,850 15,975,635 1,533,621 10,962,848 544,937 19,313,088 29,654,698 16,520,572 (14,610,070) (25,616,013) (12,525,188) $ 14,610,070) 25,616.013) S (12,525,1881 10 Annual kcport 2006 District of Maple Ridge Segment Report - Continued Transportation 2006 2006 2005 Actual Budget Actual 983,232 1,118,844 636,327 1,806,517 7,252,485 11,797,405 - $ - $ 1,900,521 944,603 5,277,328 1,202,337 785,760 607,714 1,550,551 1,849,186 7,252,485 17,28 3,616 16,766,645 21,887,456 Recreation and Cultural 2006 2006 2005 Actual Budget Actual 209,833 3,306,665 3,905,775 7,422,273 - $ - 427,086 148,477 6,658,788 1,677,064 3,855,454 3,813,004 10,941,328 5,638,545 2,1247,456 2,027,865 2,335,001 6,895,982 5,435,393 6,533,054 4,062,357 4,288,559 3,798,917 5,381,482 6,665,234 5,187,498 40,651 54,368 50,603 1,566,525 1,567,428 1,715,760 6,350,464 6,370,792 6,184,521 13,843,989 13,668,055 13,436,312 3,681,657 10,674,168 4,540,443 4,327,840 8,420,487 2,316,218 7,252,485 7,252,485 17,283,616 - - - 17,284,606 24,297,445 28,008,580 18,171,829 22,088,542 15,752,530 (5,487,201) (7,530,800) (6,121,124) (10,749,556) (11,147,214) (10,113,985) 158,817 172,328 149,798 1,009,430 962,963 232,772 $ (5,646.0181S (7,703,128) $ (0,270922) S (11,758,9861 S (12,110.177) $ (10,346,7571 Annual Report 2000 - District of Mapl . Ridge 17 Segment Report - Continued._ _ Revenue Tax revenues (schedule 3) Senior government transfers (schedule 6) Development revenue (schedule 5) Other revenues (schedule 4) Disposal proceeds and refinancing gains Investment income Internal recoveries Contributions for subdivision infrastructure Total Revenue Expenditures Operating (schedules 11,9,13,12,10,8) Goods and services Labour costs Debt Servicing Increase in investment allowance Capital (statement 2) Contributed subdivision infrastructure Total Expenditures 2006 Actual S 48,480 S 1,152 566,784 7,421,064 1,704,125 9,741,605 Water Utility 2006 2005 Budget Actual 35,004 S 34,650 1,152 5,477 1,196,426 369,126 7,238,814 6,646,349 1,704,125 3,719,477 10,175,521 10,775,079 4,509,230 5,112,350 3,795,976 1,323,498 925,801 1,328,687 3,741 23,171 56,133 5,836,469 6,061,322 5,180,796 2,137,659 3,351,204 2,071,471 1,704,125 1,704,125 3,719,477 9,678,253 11,116,651 10,971,744 Excess(Deficiency) revenue over expenditure 63,352 (941,130) (196,665) Principal Payments 10,473 46,053 188,313 New debt issued - - - Increase (Decrease) in fund balances S 52,879 S (987.1831S (384.9781 18 Annual Report 2000 District of Maple Ridge Segment Report - Continued Sewer Utility 2006 2006 2005 Actual Budget Actual S 707,420 S 683,412 S 681,765 S 311,418 302,604 326,898 73,388 587,321 406,704 4,723.746 4,774,368 4,365,308 1,891,640 1,891,640 5,281,599 _ 7,707,612 8,239,345 11,062,274 General Government 2006 2006 2005 Actual Budget Actual - S - S - 13,508 20,004 5,410 - - 994,254 1,951,941 1,406,343 1,687,744 525,221 - 725,244 2,490,670 1,426,347 3,412,652 5,217,447 5,321,077 4,924,824 2,847,689 3,450,277 3,282,711 411,345 473,301 415,922 4,831,423 4,916,220 4,355,276 46,949 48,688 197,647 393,867 215,320 379,732 5,675,741 5,843,066 5.538,393 8,072,979 8,581,817 8,017,719 431,217 2,536,846 836,516 313,239 2,033,023 1,553,791 1,891,640 1,891,640 5,281,599 - - - 7,998,598 10,271,552 11,656,508 8,386,218 10,614,840 9,571,510 (290,986) (2,032,207) (594,234) (5,895,548) (9,188,493) (6,158,858) 304,789 312,359 583,349 130,598 130,599 - - - - 357,675 - _ S (595,775) S (2,344,5661 8 (1,177.5831 S (5.668,471) 1 (9,319,092) S (6,158.8581 Annual Report 2000 District of Maple Ridge 19 Segment Report - Continued Revenue Tax revenues (schedule 3) Senior government transfers (schedule 6) Development revenue (schedule 5) Other revenues (schedule 4) Disposal proceeds and refinancing gains Investment income Internal recoveries Contributions for subdivision infrastructure Total Revenue Expenditures Operating (schedules 1 1,9,13,12,10,8) Goods and services Labour costs Debt Servicing Commercial Tower 2006 2006 2005 Actual Budget Actual 8 - $ $ 1,364,041 1,100,720 1,376,809 1,364,041 1,100,720 1,376, 809 465,165 429,224 451,080 722,806 760,208 586,074 1,187,971 1,189,432 1,037,154 Increase in investment allowance - - - Capital (statement 2) - - - Contributed subdivision infrastructure - - - Total Expenditures 1,187,971 1,189,432 1,037,154 Excess(Deficiency) revenue over expenditure 176,070 (88,712) 339,655 Principal Payments 783,998 713,994 827,992 New debt issued - - - Increase (Decrease) in fund balances S (607,9281 S (802,7061 $ (488,3371 20 Annual Repoxt')OW District of Maple R1d'_>c Segment deport - Continued Planning and Public Health Unallocated 2006 2006 2005 2006 2006 2005 Actual Budget Actual Actual Budget Actual S 1,205,276 S 1,204,066 S 1,147,107 5 40,260,161 S 40,420,955 S 37,082,830 79,030 - 75,991 - _ _ 752,441 560,460 647,630 - - 2,455,874 1,794,996 2,271,515 2,036,747 1,764,526 1,870,728 42,716,035 42,215,951 39,354,345 1,350,489 1,789,381 1,277,700 1,317,395 1,532,476 1,127,419 2,667,884 3,321,857 2,405,119 - - - - 169,283 _ 246,284 654,124 152,779 - _ 2 914 168 3 975 981 2 557 898 169 283 (877,421) (2,211,455) (687,170) 42,546,752 42,215,951 39,354,345 5 (877,4211 (2211.4551 .r (687,170) 42.546.752 S 42215.951 S 39.354.345 Annual Report 2000 — District of Maple Rid:*e 2 j Segment Report - Continued. Elimination Entries 2006 2006 2005 Actual Budget Actual Revenue Tax revenues (schedule 3) S -- Senior r overmnent transfers (schedule 6) - - - Development revenue (schedule 5) - - - Other revenues (schedule 4) - - - Disposal proceeds and refinancing gains - - - Investment income - - - Internal recoveries (1,806,517) (1,550,551) (1,849,186) Contributions for subdivision infrastructure - - - Total Revenue (1,806,517) (1,550,551) (1,849,186) Expenditures Operating (schedules 1 I ,9,13,12,10,8) Goods and services (1,806,517) (1,550,551) (1,849,186) Labour costs - - - Debt Servicing - - - (1,806,517) (1,550,551) (1,849,186) Increase in investment allowance - - - Capital (statement 2) - - Contributed subdivision infrastructure - - - Total Expenditures (1,806,517) (1,550,551) (1,849,186) Excess(Deficiency) revenue over expenditure - - - Principal Payments - New debt issued - - Increase (Decrease) in fund balances - - - 12 Annual Report 1-000 - District of Maple Ridge Segment Report - Continued Consolidated Financial Statements 2006 2006 2005 Actual Budget Actual $ 42,221,337 $ 42,343,437 $ 38,946,352 2,487,939 3,456,888 2,291,237 5,065,681 13,744,461 4,667,930 24,568,587 22,930,485 22,337,116 525,221 - 725,244 2,455,874 1,794,996 2,271,515 10,848,250 10,848,250 26,284,692 88.172,889 95,118,517 97,524,086 33,044,416 34,084,003 31,767,707 23,789,492 25,424,454 21,172,807 2,774,539 2,669,183 2,985,949 59,608,447 62,177,640 55,926,463 169,283 - - 12,671,517 38,632,700 12,016,155 10,848,250 10,848,250 26,284,692 83,297,497 111,658,590 94,227,310 4,875,392 (16,540,073) 3,296,776 2,398,105 2,338 296 1,982,224 357,675 - _ - 2,834,E (18,878,369) $ 1,314.552 Annual Report 2000 - Dis[rm of Maple Ridge 23 Schedule 2 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Debenture Debt For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 General Capital Fund Maturity Date of Issue Bylaw Purpose Dates Recreation and cultural Nov 15, 1983 3152 Leisure Pool Complex 1984 — 2008 Apr 06, 2005 6246 Downtown Civic Properties (MFA 93) 2005 — 2027 Subtotal General Government Apr 06, 2005 6246 Downtown Office Complex (MFA 93) 2005 - 2027 Dec 08,2006 6246 Downtown Office Complex (MFA 99) 2006 - 2027 Subtotal Transportation May 13, 1992 4667 Downtown Parking 1992— 2007 Dec 01, 1995 5291 Downtown Parking Issue 61 1995 — 2010 Jun 15, 1983 3086 Storm Sewer System D.C.C. (MFA 33) 1983— 2008 Subtotal Sewer System Jan 15, 1982 3019 Sewer Area "A" 1982 —2006 Jan 15, 1982 3020 Sewer Area "A" 1982 —2006 May 13, 1992 4667 Sanitary Sewer 240th Street Albion (4468) 1992 — 2007 Jun 15, 1983 3085 Sewer System D.C.C. (MFA 33) 1983— 2008 Subtotal Water System Jun 15, 1983 3084 Water System D.C.C. (MFA 33) 1983— 2008 Subtotal 30 Annual Report 2006 - Dish ict of Maple Ridge 30 Schedule 2 - continued Debentures Interest Outstanding and Debenture Debt Original Before 2006 Exchange Retirements December 31, Interest Debenture Debt Retirement 2006 2006 2006 Rates 350,000 67,627 12,688 67,627 - 11.125 - 11.500 28,190,830 28,190,830 1,553,837 941,803 27,249,027 5.700 28,540.830 28,258,457 1,566,525 1,009,430 27,249,027 3,909,170 3,909,170 215,468 130,598 3,778,572 5.700 - 16,300,000 16,300,000 256,409 - 16,300,000 4.990 20,209,170 20,209,170 471,877 130,598 20,078,572 1,200,000 214,968 23,948 104,862 110,106 9.628 300,000 125,134 3,257 22,647 102,487 9.628 339,600 106,027 11,184 31,308 74,719 12.400 1,839,600 446,129 38,389 158,817 287,312 750,000 102,405 15,662 102,405 - 14.750 1,531,916 156,028 15,993 156,028 - 10.000 112,375 20,131 2,243 9,820 10,311 9.628 396,300 123,731 13,051 36,536 87,195 12.375 _ 2,790,591 402,295 46,949 304,789 97,506 113,600 35,468 3,741 10,473 24,995 11.250 113,600 35,468 3,741 10,473 24,995 $ 53,493,791 $ 49,351,519 $ 2,127,481 $ 1,614,107 $ 47,737,412 Annual keport 2000 Dismict of Maplc Ridge 31 Significant Accounting Policies For the year ended December 31, 2006 (a) Reporting Entity and Basis of Consolidation These financial statements have been prepared using recommendations issued by the Public Sector Accounting Board of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. They consolidate the activities of the General, Water and Sewer, Operating and Capital Funds, the Reserve Funds, and Municipality's wholly owned subsidiaries C.D.M.R. Developments Ltd. and Maple Ridge Municipal Holdings Ltd. The operating activities of the subsidiary companies are included in the General Revenue Fund and the Capital activities of the subsidiary companies are included in the General Capital Fund. Operating Funds - As at December 31, 2006 the fund balances were as follows: General Revenue Fund Sewer Revenue Fund Water Revenue Fund Capital Funds - As at December 31, 2006 the fund balances (deficiencies) were as follows: General Capital Fund Sewer Capital Fund Water Capital Fund Reserves - As at December 31, 2006 this balance was comprised of the balances shown in Schedule 14. Reserve Funds Total Fund Balances Long Term Liabilities - These liabilities are incurred to fund capital expenditures Debenture Debt - comprised of the debts shown on Schedule 2 Mortgage Liability Long Term Liabilities Net Assets (Debt) 2006 2005 $ 2,442,301 S 4,203,057 3,401,602 4,021,712 3,353,988 2,846,785 9,197,891 11,071,554 393,749 (561,934) - (1,065,268) - (10,961) 393,749 (1,638,163) 42,062,019 39,385,306 51,653,659 48,818,697 (47,737,412) (33,051,518) - (16,726,326) (47,737,412) (49,777,844) S 3,916,247 $59147 (b) Accrual Accounting The accrual method for reporting revenues and expenditures has been used. Revenues are recorded in the period they are earned. Expenditures are recorded as the cost of goods or services in the period they are obtained. Annual Repoi t'_000 — District of Maple Ridge Significant Accounting Policies For the year ended December 31, 2006 (c) Revenue recognition Taxation Annual levies for non -optional municipal services and general administrative services are recorded as Taxes for municipal purposes. Levies imposed by other taxing authorities are not included as Taxes for municipal purposes. Taxes are recognized as revenue in the year they are levied. Through the British Columbia Assessments appeal process Taxes may be adjusted by way of supplementary roll adjustments. The affects of these adjustments on Taxes are recognized at the time they are awarded. User fees and other revenue Charges for sewer and water usage are recorded as User fees and other revenue. Senior government transfers Unconditional grant revenue is recognized when it is received. Conditional grant revenue is recognized to the extent the conditions imposed on it have been fulfilled. Development revenue Receipts which are restricted by the legislation of senior governments or by agreement with external parties are reported as Restricted Revenues at the time they are received. When qualifying expenditures are incurred restricted revenues are brought into revenue as Development revenue. Restricted Revenues are comprised of the amounts and transactions shown on Schedule 7. lit vesunent lit coin e The Municipality invests in pooled funds of the Municipal Finance authority of British Columbia. Earnings of these funds are allocated to the members from time to time based on the market value of the pool. The Municipality recognizes only its share of the realized earnings of the pool. This revenue is recorded as investment income and the amount is added to the cost of the units held. To the extent that financial instruments have no stated rate of return investment income is recognized as it is received. Local Improvement Revenue The Municipality records capital expenditures for property and equipment funded by local improvement agreements as they are incurred. Revenues are recognized as Development revenue at the time of the expenditures to the extent that they will be recoverable. Local improvement levies subsequently imposed under the agreement are recorded as User fees and other revenue for the portion that pertains to a carrying charge. Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment Proceeds from the sale of tangible Property and equipment are recognized as revenue at the time of sale. (d) Consolidated expenditures Consolidated expenditures reported on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position are reported by function and include operating, capital and interest costs and are net of internal equipment allocations. Reporting by object (type) of expenditure is included in the Segment Report. (e) Property and equipment Property and equipment purchased or constructed and work in process are reported as capital expenditures and are classified according to their functional use. Property and equipment donated are reported at fair market value at the time of the donation. Accumulated capital expenditures, net of disposals, are reported on Schedule 1. Depreciation is not recorded. (f) Subdivision infrastructure Subdivision streets, lighting, sidewalks, drainage, and other infi-astructnre are required to be provided by subdivision developers. Upon completion they are turned over to the Municipality. The Municipality is not involved in the construction and does not budget for either the contribution from the developer nor the capital iiMILK1) RCP(XI 2000 OISMCt of Maple Ridge Significant Accounting Policies For the year ended December 31, 2006 expenditure in its financial plan. The budget figures presented on the financial statements are equal to the value of infrastructure turned over to the Municipality during the year. (g) Use of estimates/measurement uncertainty The preparation of financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenditures during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring use of management estimates relate to the determination of employee future benefits, the outcome of litigation and claims, and the percentage of completion of building and subdivision inspections. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Municipality monitors and treats contaminates produced at a solid waste landfill site it closed in 1989. The eventual expenditures the Municipality intends to incur related to the site are not determinable and no accrual for them has been recorded. Monitoring and treatment expenditures are recognized as they are made. (h) Budget figures The budget figures used are based on the five year financial plan adopted May 9, 2006. Contributed subdivision infrastructure for 2006 has been added to the adopted financial plan amounts in order to better demonstrate comparability with the actual results. (i) Financial instruments The Municipality's financial instruments consist of cash and temporary investments, portfolio investments, accounts receivable, recoverable local improvements, other assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, refundable performance deposits, mortgage liability, other assets, and debenture debt. Unless otherwise indicated, it is management's opinion that the Municipality is not exposed to any significant interest, credit, or currency risks arising from these financial instruments. (j) Investments Investments and pooled investments are reported using the cost method. Provisions for declines in the market value of investments are recorded when they are considered to be other than temporary. Declines in the market values of investments are considered to be other than temporary when the carrying value exceeds market value for more than three years. (k) Cost share agreement The Municipality participates in a cost share agreement with the City of Pitt Meadows to provide all of the Recreation and cultural services and maintain all of the parks in both municipalities. The Municipality recognizes expenditures at their gross value and records the City of Pitt Meadows' contribution as revenue. (1) Basis of segmentation/Segment report The Municipality has adopted the new Public Sector Accounting Board reconunendation requiring financial information to be provided on a segmented basis. Municipal services have been segmented by grouping activities that have similar services objectives (by function). Revenues that are directly related to the costs of the function have been attributed to each segment. Expenditures reported for each segment include an allocation for internal equipment charges. Interest is allocated to functions based on the purpose of specific borrowings. Annual Repot 2000 — District of, Maple Ridge Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 1. Cash and Investments: Cash and Temporarylnvestments: Cash and temporary investments as at December 31, 2006 were comprised as follows: Cash Temporary Investments 2006 2005 $ 3,250,031 $ 8,205,507 24,816,735 24,334,510 $ 28,066,766 32 54.0 017 Temporary Investments are bank terns deposits and Guaranteed Investment Certificates with effective interest rates of 4.43% - 4.9%. Additionally, the Municipality holds temporary investments of $1,345,047 ($855,869 for 2005) and agreements receivable of $1,153,668 ($406,403 for 2005) for trusts which are not reported elsewhere in the financial statements. They are held for the following trusts: Balance Interest Balance Dec. 31, 2005 Earned Receipts Disbursements Dec. 31. 2006 Latecomer Fees $ — $ — $ 131,004 $ 28,194 $ 102,810 Cemetery Perpetual Care 548,494 22,074 38,065 22,074 586,559 Greater Vancouver 713,778 — 2,048,997 953,429 1,809,346 Sewer & Drainage District 1 262 272 22 074 2 218 066 =1 003,Z $2 498.715 Portfolio Investments Portfolio investments include Provincial Government Bonds and Bank Notes with effective interest rates of 3.8 — 4.1%. They also include equity -based Bank Notes and pooled investment funds administered by the Municipal Finance Authority of British Columbia, neither of which has a stated rate of return. The carrying value of securities is based on the cost method whereby the cost of the security is adjusted to reflect investment income, which is accruing, and any permanent decline in market value. The carrying value of Portfolio Investments, net of an allowance of $169,283 (Nil for 2005), at December 31, 2006 was $67,030,331 ($49,985,738 for 2005). The market value at December 31, 2006 was $65,910,491 ($48,780,688 for 2005), included in this amount is $7,500,000 ($7,500,000 for 2005) for securities shown at cost for investments for which there is no active market. 2. Accounts Receivable: 2006 2005 Property Taxes $ 3,158,192 $ 3,384,389 Other Govermnents 881,928 610,224 General and Accrued Interest 2.585,841 1,781,517 Development Cost Charges 8.893,135 4,512,230 15,519,096 10,288,360 Less Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (163,742) (9,352) $15,35_5.3_54 10,279,008 Annual Report 2000 — District of Maple Ridge 9 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 3. Recoverable Local Improvements The Municipality provides interim financing for certain geographically localized capital projects. It recovers these amounts either from the benefiting property owners or from provincial subsidies. As at December 31, 2006 the recoverable balance was comprised as follows: 2006 2005 Recoverable from property owners Transportation and drainage projects - $ 181,976 Local improvement fund projects 591,083 793,319 Sewerage projects 8,517 16,353 599,600 991,648 Recoverable from Province Sewerage projects 206,155 354,033 Water system projects 9,019 36,966 215,174 390.999 Ul 3_82 647 4. Pension Plan The Municipality and its employees contribute to the Municipal Pension Plan (the "Plan"), a jointly trusted pension plan. The board of trustees, representing plan members and employers, is responsible for overseeing the management of the pension plan, including investment of the assets and administration of the benefits. The pension plan is a multi -employer contributory pension plan. Basic pension benefits provided are defined. The plan has about 130,000 active members and approximately 48,000 retired members. Active members include approximately 30,000 contributors from local governments. Every three years an actuarial valuation is performed to assess the financial position of the Plan and the adequacy of plan funding. The most recent valuation as at December 31, 2003 indicated an unfunded liability of $789 million for basic pension benefits. The next valuation will be as at December 31, 2006 with results available in 2007. The actuary does not attribute portions of the surplus to individual employers. The above disclosure represents the most current information at the time of the Municipality's 2006 financial audit. Employer contributions to the Plan for 2006 were $1,266,984 ($1,019,441 for 2005) they are included in consolidated operating expenditures. Employee contributions for 2006 were $1,145,208 ($941,983 for 2005). 5. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities: 2006 2005 Accounts Payable: General $ 2,893,433 $ 2,575,051 Other Governments 5,712,422 4,443,046 Salaries and Wages 915,846 863,700 9,521,701 7,881,797 Accrued Liabilities: Vacation Pay 503,234 399,234 Other vested benefits 274,999 144,222 778,233 543,456 10,299,934$ 42 25 10 Annual Report 2000 District of Maple Ridge Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 6. Debenture Debt: Debt principal is reported net of Sinking Fund balances and interest expense is reported net of Sinking Fund earnings. During the year the Municipality discharged the Mortgage liability held with Toronto Dominion bank and replaced the liability with debenture debt in the amount of $16,300,000 from the Municipal Finance Authority. The Municipality carries no debt for others. The Debenture debt issued and outstanding as at December 31, 2006 was $47,737,412 ($33,051,518 for 2005). The following debenture debt amounts plus related interest are payable over the next five years. 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 $1,812,793 $1,794,001 $1,727,113 $1,760,031 $1,779,974 As at December 31, 2006 the Municipality has approved but un-issued debenture debt in the amount of $700,000 under Loan Authorization Bylaw 6246 which expires in 2011. 7. Other Assets: Debt Reserve Fund: The Municipal Finance Authority of British Columbia provides capital financing for regional districts and their member municipalities. The Authority is required to establish a Debt Reserve Fund. Each regional district, through its member municipalities who share in the proceeds of a debt issue, is required to pay into the Debt Reserve Fund certain amounts set out in the debt agreements. The Authority pays into the Debt Reserve Fund these monies from which interest earned thereon less administrative expenses becomes an obligation to the regional districts. It must then use this find, if at any time there are insufficient funds, to meet payments on its obligations. If this occurs the regional districts may be called upon to restore the fund. Upon the maturity of a debt issue the unused portion of the Debt Reserve Fund established for that issue will be discharged to the Municipality. The Municipality has estimated that there is only a remote possibility that these funds will not be paid to it and therefore these funds have been included in Other Assets of $611,828 ($1,000,530 for 2005). Annual Report 200o — District of Maple Ridge I I Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 8. Employee Future Benefits The Municipality provides employee future benefits in the form of severance benefits and vested and non -vested sick leave to qualifying employees. These benefits are not separately funded. Severance benefits are cash settlements paid to employees who cease their employment with the Municipality after a specified period of time. Full time employees hired before February 11, 1999 qualify for five days pay per year of employment, provided they either work a minimum of twenty years with the Municipality or retire as defined by the Public Sector Pension Plan Act. Full time employees hired after February 11, 1999 qualify for twenty days pay provided they work a minimum of ten years with the Municipality and retire as defined by the Public Sector Pension Plan Act. The Municipality permits full time employees to accumulate up to 18 days per year of service for future illnesses up to a maximum of 250 days. For certain qualifying employees a portion of this benefit vests; for the balance this benefit does not vest and cannot be converted to any other type of benefit. An actuarial valuation of these benefits was performed to determine the Municipality's liability and accrued benefit obligation as at December 31, 2005 and updated for December 31, 2006. The valuation resulted in an unamortized actuarial gain of $59,100 at December 31, 2006. The benefit liability at December 31, 2006 was $3,915,400 ($3,587,774 for 2005) is comprised as follows: MU 2005 Benefit Liability — Beginning of the year $3,587,774 $3,171,602 Add (less): Unamortized actuarial gains (losses) 76,326 - Accrued benefit obligation — Beginning of the year 3,664,100 3,171,602 Add: Total liability related costs Cur -rent service costs 241,800 396,697 Interest on accrued benefit obligation 178,400 185,706 Amortization of actuarial losses (gains) 76,326 - 496,526 582,403 Less (Add): Liability related costs not increasing accrued benefit obligation - 76,326 - amortization of actuarial loss. Actuarial gain (loss) 59,100 (76,326) Benefits paid during the year 168,900 166,231 304,326 89,905 Accrued Benefit Obligation — End of the year 3,856,300 3,664,100 Add (less) Unamortized actuarial gains (losses) 59.100 (76,326) Benefit liability — end of the year S.. 3 915s,400 $3 7.774 Actuarial assumptions used to determine the Municipality's accrued benefit obligation are as follows: 2006 2005 Discount rate (long-term borrowing rate) 4.500/4, 5.65% Expected future inflation rate 2.50% 5.65% Merit and inflationary wage and salary increases averaging 4.551)/o 5.65% 12 Flnnual Report 2000 District of Maple Ride Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 9. Mortgage Liability During 2004 the Municipality's subsidiary company assumed a mortgage with the Toronto Dominion bank as part of the acquisition of the town centre properties. The mortgage amount ($16,692,115) plus accrued interest ($41,283) was assumed at a rate (6.5%) which was unfavorable in relation to borrowing rates which were prevalent at the time. The mortgage liability was revalued at the present value of the payments required under the mortgage using the Municipality's cost of borrowing. This resulted in an increase in the liability by $997,469 which was accounted for as a discount in proceeds received. The discount was amortized over the remaining term of the mortgage. The mortgage matured in November of 2006 and was refinanced with Municipal Finance Authority debenture debt at a rate of 4.99%. (Note 6) The Mortgage Liability December 31, 2006 was Nil ($16,726,326 for 2005) comprised as follows Interest Principal expense and payments and Balance amortization amortization Balance Dec 31. 2005 in 2006 in 2006 Dec 31, 2006 Mortgage Payable $16,284,106 $ 908,616 $16,284,106 $ — Discount 442,220 (442,220) 442,220 — Mortgage Liability $16 726 326 $ 466 396 16.726,326 $ — 10. Contingencies, Commitments and Unrecognized Liabilities: (a) Third Party Claims Where losses related to litigation are likely and can be reasonably estimated management accrues its best estimate of loss. For 2006 this estimate is $612,116 ($534,000 for 2005). The Municipality is further exposed to losses with respect to claims, the likelihood of which is not known. Management estimates that the exposure is approximately $63,000. This estimate is based on the deductible portion of insurance claims and on the mid -range of other non -insurable claims. Additional accounts payable, if any, will be recorded in the period they become determinable. (b) Contractual Obligations (i) Sewer and Water (a) Under cost sharing agreements with the Greater Vancouver Water District, the Municipality is committed to make annual payments as follows: Until the year 2007 totaling $20,223 plus related interest for the water reservoir on Dewdney Trunk Road at 248°i Street, the current annual payment is $87,149 including interest until 2007 when the payment terms are to be renegotiated. Until the year 2012 totaling $104,370 plus related interest for the water main joint 1. Current annual payment is $226,7 % including interest until 2012. Annual Report 2006 District of Maple Ridge Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 (b) Under a cost sharing agreement with the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District, the Municipality is committed to make annual payments until 2012 totaling $870,307 plus related interest for facilities in the Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows sub -area. The current annual payment is $220,482 plus interest. (c) The Municipality has entered into a cost share agreement with the Greater Vancouver Water District for the construction of infrastructure. Under this agreement the Municipality expects to incur liabilities of approximately $9,000,000 over the next seven years. The liability will be recorded as the related costs are incurred. (ii) Recreation and Cultural Services (a) In 1998 the Municipality entered into an agreement to purchase ice sheet time for five years commencing in 1999, with a five-year renewal option. In January 2004 the Municipality renewed the agreement for an additional five-year period. The minimum annual payment due for the provision of ice time is $552,225. These payments are recorded as expenditures when the ice time is provided. (c) Contingent Gains In 1998 the Municipality provided financial assistance, including property appraised at $2.2 Million, to the Maple Ridge Elderly Citizen Recreation Association in order to enable them to construct a residential housing complex for senior citizens. In exchange for the assistance, the Association agreed to place restrictive covenants on each unit, which could recover up to $1.45 Million on re -sales by subsequent owners. These covenants apply until 2030. At December 31, 2006 a further $0.68 million ($1.06 million for 2005) remains recoverable. In 2006 proceeds from the resale of units under the restricted covenants amounting to $378,985 ($267,031 for 2005) were paid to the Municipality. These proceeds are recorded as User fees and other revenue. (d) Unrecognized Liability The Municipality holds shares in a non-profit organization that provides protective services to its members. Should the organization dissolve or management choose to withdraw from the organization the Municipality would be liable for a proportionate share of any debt the organization held at that time. The liability is expected to be discharged over time through payments by the Municipality and others for the provision of these services by the organization. Due to the ongoing operations of the organization the liability could only be quantified if the Municipality chose to withdraw. Consequently no liability has been recognized in these financial statements. 14 Annual Report 2000 Distnct of Maple Ridge Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 1 I. Interest Expenditures: Interest expenditures consist of debenture debt interest, mortgage liability interest, and interest on the employee future benefits liability. Interest is apportioned to functional areas of expenditure based on the related debts as follows. Debenture Benefits Mortgage Total Total Debt and Other Liability Interest Interest Interest Interest Interest 2006 2005 Transportation Services $ 38,389 $ 2,262 S -- S 40,651 S 50,603 Recreation & Cultural 1,566,525 — — 1,566,525 1,715,760 Water Facilities 3,741 — — 3,741 56,130 Sewer Facilities 46,949 — — 46,949 197,645 General Government 471,877 178,400 466,396 1,116,673 965,806 $2 127481 180 662 S 466 396 S1774,53,9 $_2. 985.944 Annual Report 2006 — District oi' Maple Ridge 15 Statement C The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Consolidated Statement of Change in Cash and Temporary Investments For the Year Ended December 31. 2006 Cash and Temporary Investments Provided by (Used For): Operations: Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue over Expenditures Decrease (Increase) in Non -Cash Financial Assets Accounts receivable Recoverable local improvements Other assets Increase in Short Term Liabilities Accounts payable Deferred revenues Restricted revenues Employee future benefits Refundable performance deposits and other Financing: Principal repaid Long term debt issued Investing: (Increase) decrease in portfolio investments (Decrease) increase in Cash and Temporary Investments Cash and Temporary Investments — Beginning of Year Cash and Temporary Investments — End of Year a) The notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement b) Contingencies. Commitments and Unrecognized Liabilities (Note 10) Actual Actual 2006 2005 $ 4,875,392 $ 3,296,776 (5,076,347) (93,667) 567,873 299,954 388,702 (323,076) (4,119,772) (116,789) 1,874,683 185,825 1,674,387 894,229 9,447,345 3,240,678 327,626 416,172 532,114 162,083 13,856,155 4,898,987 (18,340,433) (1,982,224) 16,300,000 - (2,040,433) (1,982,224) (17,044,593) 2,094,742 (4,473,251) 8,191,492 32,540,017 24,348,525 $ 28,066,766 $ 32,540,017 Annual Report 2006 District of Maple Ridge Statement 2 .�� The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge ;;y Statement of Changes in Capital Fund Balances For the Year Ended December- 31, 2006 Capital Fund Balances - Beginning of Year Add: Revenues Allocated to Capital Funds Subdivision infrastructure contributions Development fees (schedule 5) Senior government transfers (schedule 6) Debt issued Internal Transfers Transfer from Revenue Funds Transfer from Reserve Funds Local improvement fund Equipment replacement Capital works Fire Department capital acquisition Sanitary Sewer Land Committed projects Other Less: Capital Expenditures Protective services Transportation Recreation and culture Water utility Sewer utility General government Planning, public health and other Subdivision infrastructure Increase (Decrease) in Capital Fund Balances Capital Fund Balances - End of Year Actual Budget Actual 2006 2006 2005 S (1,638,163) S (1,638,163) S (1,033,061) 10,848,250 10,848,250 26,284,692 4,764,529 13,482,490 3,964,951 456,507 1,540,065 266,657 16,069,286 25,870,805 30,516,300 357,676 _ 2,748,635 4,624,236 2,282,005 310,226 582,017 1,430,122 1,193,640 1,025,297 3,252,867 249,160 226,004 6,360,640 283,524 1,069,134 1,354,134 282,819 - - 2,271,119 5,513,987 2,577,862 919,692 2,143,275 283,028 6,376,082 20,055,025 4,897,440 1,533,621 10,962,848 544,937 3,681,657 10,674,168 4,540,443 4,327,840 8,420,487 2,316,218 2,137,659 3,351,204 2,071,471 431,217 2,536,846 836,516 313,239 2,033,023 1,553,791 246,284 654,124 152,779 10,848,250 10,848,250 26,284,692 23,519.767 49,480,950 38,300,847 2,031,912 1,069,1 16 (605,102) S 393,749 S (569,047) S (1,638,163) Annual Report 2006 District of iVfaple Ridge. 27 The Corporation mfthe District ofMaple Ridge Financial Information Act SCHEDULE OF GUARANTEE AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENTS FOR2UOG "This organization has no guarantees orindemnities under the Guarantees and Indemnities Regu|atiun.^ Prepared pursuant to the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 5 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act SCHEDULE SHOWING THE REMUNERATION AND EXPENSES PAID TO OR ON BEHALF OF EACH EMPLOYEE FOR 2006 1 Elected Officials Name jPosition lRemuneration jBenefits Expenses Daykin Councillor 26,822.46 295.56 1,562.57 Dueck Councillor 26,822.46 3,793.96 3,296.20 Hogarth Councillor 26,822.46 3,782.26 5,296.70 King Councillor 26,822.46 157.30 1,591.39 Robson Councillor/Mayor 72,771.14 5,558.04 - Speirs Councillor 26,873.43 169.00 5,577.42 Stewart Councillor 26,873.17 5,107.06 2,406,82 Totals 1 233,807.58 1 18,863.181 19,731.10 2 Other Employees (excluding those listed in Part 1 above) Name I Remuneration Expenses Bastaja, John 105,850.99 2,875.82 Benson, Laura 78,518.26 2,396.34 Boag, David 104,550.24 807.66 Carmichael, Russ 98,576.58 2,723.01 Carter, Christine 90,354.54 860.67 Christensen, Robert 83,694.75 0.00 Cote-Rolvink, Stephen J. 85,358.53 340.87 Crabtree, Christina L. 76,352.80 4,427.59 Cramb, Donald B. 88,371.38 2,052.78 Den Uyl, Pieter M. 88,448.08 2,511.88 Exner, Howard 93,355.31 6,450.40 Franklin, Steven 82,881.91 0.00 Fryer, Terence 102,596.14 814.49 Gill, Paul 159,122,04 3,951.27 Goddard, Charles 86,540.91 75.84 Grootendorst, Peter 107,744.98 9,355.43 Harcus, David 83,469.68 0.00 Hardy, Wayne 87,680.80 2,057.36 Jorde, Shelley 82,186.63 991.26 Juurakko, Timo 93,107.43 3,225.32 Kivi, Ralph 83,597.78 1,018.01 Leeburn, John 128,140.68 4,407.42 Manson, Gary 88,651.13 1,753.79 McDonald, Brock 109,136.22 67.18 McIntosh, Thomas 85,918,59 5,411.84 Mcleod, Bruce 80,967.34 1,188.88 Mitchell, Ed 84,610.97 2,673.12 Morris, Brett 93,911.00 2,485.95 Murray, Mike 159,122.04 1,005.41 Negoita, Victor 83,916.10 1,364.25 Oddstad, Earl 82,029.33 2,376.80 Pickering, Jane 109,653.67 1,222.78 Quinn, Frank 157,939.03 1,247.09 Ramsay, Robert 84,756.21 125.75 Riach, Ron 83,136.85 2.753.18 Rule, James 210,434.68 14,949.44 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, section 6(2),(3),(4),(5) and (6) The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act SCHEDULE SHOWING THE REMUNERATION AND EXPENSES PAID TO OR ON BEHALF OF EACH EMPLOYEE FOR 2006 Sartorius, Dennis 88,424.66 Scherban, Jeff 95,933.94 Smitton, Mark 93,489.28 Sorba, Jacob 115,876.95 Spence, Dane 107,744.98 Swift, Kelly 83,816.92 Tierney, Felix 89,090.13 Wheeler, Susan 83,988.19 Wood, Andrew 110,230.28 Subtotal Consolidated Total of Employees with remuneration less than $75,000 Total All Employees 3 Reconciliation Total remuneration Elected Officials Other Employees Subtotal Other reconciling Items Employer portion of: CPP El Accruals WCB Pension Other employer costs (Medical, Dental, etc) Labour costs per pg 23, Segment Report 4,473,278.93 1,610.58 131.68 1,750.71 4,312.82 4,563.32 704.61 2,274.55 0.00 6,198.05 111,515.20 15,471,124.58 144,332.24 19,944,403.51 255,847.44 233,807.58 19,944,403.51 20,178,211.09 677,618.68 349,294.76 287,570.22 199,557.98 1,266,984.00 830,255.92 23,789,492.65 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, section 6(2),(3),(4),(5) and (6) The Corporation ofthe District mfMaple Ridge Financial Information Act STATEMENT OF SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS There was one severance agreement under which payment commenced between the District of Maple Ridge and its non -unionized employees during the fiscal year 2OOH. This agreement represents 11months ofnonopensaUon.° * "Compensation" means salary. Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, subsection 6(7) The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act SCHEDULE SHOWING PAYMENTS MADE FOR THE PROVISION OF GOODS OR SERVICES FOR 2006 1 Alphabetical list of suppliers who received aggregate payments exceeding $25,000 Supplier Name Aggregate amount paid to supplier 11990 HOLDI\GS INU 87,331, \ILRK1 EY. DONALD & GR-ACF 424.078 A & G SI'PPLY CTD 36.241 ABIWISFORD II\11_S 42,395 ACOF\ I GLASS & I OCKSMI I [1 28,183 AOTIVI7 N1:1\VORK I_TD 26,220 ACC M \ I.N(il\FFRI\(i I_11) 65,708 ,A1.1310\ DYKI\Ci DIS I RIC I_ 35.990 A\DRF\VSiI:REI LTD 27.150 AAV FIIZ( 61 ARD & SLIPPI II S 11D 32,754 A\\' FRASI R & ASSOCIA"II.S 38,505 R A fat ACK\V'EJ I d ASSOCIATES (_TD 26,588 13ARTLF & OHISO\ CO I_TD 71,853 1W IIYDRO 882,781 1W SPC A 279,046 RDO DLNWOODY 57,096 I1IlJTSI3FRGFR V-ALFRII: 49.632 13013'S A / IZG\ EAI S LTD 26,400 BOII_F:At I I I_Cl RK &, POI F 1 TD 232,106 13RIS I OL I3ABCOCK 26.343 BY\FI 10O\Sl RI, 0T10\ SERVICES 992.902 0A\ADA PIPE COMPANY Ll D 119,690 ('A\ADIAN PACIFIC RA1I_AVAY 34,102 ('17 ARCI111 F( I I RF PLAN\I\G 122,896 011I5RRY 110\1FS I_l D 25.302 ( l ll:VRO\ CAN ADA Ll D 563,650 01 L1' OF PI I I 11FAD0\VS 150,435 ( I_ARKI . D(A GI, AS \17 SO\ 406,372 Cl I:AR A I FR I V'VIRO\\tl:A-I AI 6ROt 1) 115,219 0OIWA FI.1iC"1RIC 1,11) 45,621 001.1 \-1I31A BI`IGLIIIIK LTD 721,696 (AI\1I:IWIA1_ AQI Al I(' SUPPI_IIS 38.407 C'O-PILOT 1\1)t Sl RIFS '55.541 CREA I IVI_ l'RANSPOR IA Il0\ 43,593 GROSS ('O\\IF 45,017 ('SDU SYSTI[\1S I\(' 26.503 ('I SI0v1 BLACK 101)CO 208,914 ( WNI\t 0O\S1 1 11\(i G\GI\I{FRS Ll D 68.573 DAMS FORD 1_IA('01 A SAL IS I_TD 58,777 DAVITS, MIKE 33,191 DAl' AD\ FRTISIAG GRUt`P 1\C' 56,269 DEI_0.A\ CORPORA I IO\ 27,950 DFLPIII SOIJ 11ONS CORN 75.078 DL\1( O DISPOSAL SFIZA ICE LTD 56,017 DOt 131,1 1 M FX('AVAII\G LID 137,058 DlI_A\DSCAPING LTD 30,854 DI JRANTE KIZIJ K 1_TD 45,672 I.ARTII 'ITCH CA\ADA I\C 93,435 I RA 1=\GIALFRIAG ('0\SI LIANIS I_TD 63,449 FMCO LIMI LD 39,412 1 \1I:RGl ACY C0A1A11, A10AT10\S 971,979 I:VIPIRI: SIG\\VORKS I\C 38.052 FSRI ( A\ -\DA LIMI I FD 51.958 1 APM "I I:K 11 RF SI%RVKTS I\0 55.925 hi\\I\G IArL1:!Z\-A!IO\AI_ I\C 104,661 111\GSS DI P01 (`0\1\41:RCIAL 1\0 77545 1 11 \1'SS FIX AllO\S 32.319 1 ORI F ARRK AI IQ\ & \\l LD1\G I_TD 42.642 1 RASFR \ AI I F1' RI[(ilO\AL 1,1BRARY ?.969,0,34 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, section 7 and the Financial Information Act, section 2 114 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act SCHEDULE SHOWING PAYMENTS MADE FOR THE PROVISION OF GOODS OR SERVICES FOR 2006 I'RFD St RRID61: 11 D 38,464 I RFI(il l Ill\ER 01: VA\COI VFR 187.848 61BSOV WATERWORKS S1 PPI_Y I\C 75,600 6O1_DI:\ FARS I YPRF.SS CA I FRFRS 43,151 GOLDFR & ASSOCIATES 31.730 GRA\D & I OY OI 1 ICE PRODI CFS 34,377 6RA\DBOIS. MICHELLF 126,136 6RFA I FR VA\(' WATFR DISTRICT 3,048.289 ORFA FFR V'A\('Ol VER RL(iIO\AI_ DIS 318,699 6RFI A ( t 1 ('ON-] RACTI\G 94.259 W ILD. YI IT & COMPANY 1_11' 100,664 (it 'ILLI VIN IN1FR\ATIO\AL IN( 182,453 111\FY [It'ILDFRS St-PPLIFS 1971 28.325 IIANFY HORSIAI \ ASSOCIA310\ 35.055 HA\KS IRt'C'KIAG AND 13L I_LDOZING 32,764 II,APPI' HLART 1 H'\ESS FIX 154,311 IIALC'0l::\VIRO/21)004200 7,'8 28.520 1IFARI & SO[ L 1 FINF.SS 1_TD 105.672 Hl 1k'1_L11 P.ACKARDCANADA LTD 30,226 III FSI:R. LAA\RI A('1. 346,945 I C IW 104,794 1\111FRIAL PAVI\6 595,557 IS[, 66,069 11 I 1:1 YG1 30,094 JACKS At T0V10 I IVF &` WI:1_DI\G 118,232 JUST CO\ I RACTI\G 50,457 Jt'S'I ICI: I\SII3 t'1 F OF W 30.322 KA1_ TIRE 56.725 KFDCO CONSTRUCTOR LTD 528,089 KERR WOOD LFIDAI_ ASSOCIA FFS 29.107 I IDS1O\1 YOI \G ANDI RSO\ 197439 1 0\6 V'IF\\ SYS 1 [ vIS CORPORA IO\ 44,845 1 ORDCO PARTS LTD 64,669 1 SI_ Al VAAG1:AII \I LTD 88,530 \IACKAY.P_AIOORF.A.. I)FRI_I'R,L. & WllI SO\.G. 845,050 \1A1\ROAD CO\ HZAC'I lAG LTD 283,125 \1A\t LIFF FINANCIAL. 641,895 \1AP1_I RID6L I IIS1 ORICAI_ SOCIFTY 60.506 MARK St '1 1 LE AGF\('II:S I_T) 219,761 MAR-1 t (I1 IADI RGROt \D SFRVI('FS 63,553 MCRAPS F.AVIROA\1L\I AI SI RVI('ES 28,184 MCI AR PI:1 ROl l t \1 I Tp 34,645 \11:1)ICA1 SI'R\ I(IS PLAN 142,633 \1PTRO \101 (RS 1.11) 112,464 \11CROSERVI 49,336 MICROS011 l_ICI \SING 138,048 MILLS PRIVI1\6 & STA1IONFRY 72,678 MINOF LI\ANCI DI -PI OI TRANSP. 120,329 \1JT F\TERPRISI:S L I'D 77,675 \10131L1 ( 0\1 RADIO COMPANY 33,930 MODFR\ GROI \D \1A1\TF\A\CF. LTD 68,294 V1ORROW 131OSCIFN('I: 1-1-1) 32,163 MR DOA\ \10W\ PARKI\Ci SOCIETY 40,199 \1R DO\1'\ EON\'\ PROP OWNERS ASS\ 25.000 \It \K]PAL I\St RA\(1 ASSOC 637,917 Mt \ICIPAI PI'\SIO\ PI_A\ 1,317,985 Vt S31 16R0M1) MARK1 1 RI S1 ARCH 30,210 \O\V SOLt ILO\S 33.657 OCI AA CO\STRt CIIO\ St PPI_IF:S 51,287 O'( O\\FLL.I3., SI JI A\.R. d ST.J( A\,S. 247,567 P VC1EIC St RRF)CO\S1 Rt CT10\ 80,662 PA\01RAMA I_MS 401 1 72,733 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, section 7 and the Financial Information Act, section 2 2/4 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act SCHEDULE SHOWING PAYMENTS MADE FOR THE PROVISION OF GOODS OR SERVICES FOR 2006 PAt L 13t \YA\ I REF SERVICES 45.060 PF\-A\ I S I CI,'1 "f IN( &, CORING 31.002 PIt"I \11 VDO\V'S IIFRIIA61: &I \1t S1-t \1 38.629 PI I I RIVER QI ARlu S 91,686 I'LAYI'0A\ F.R I I C A\ADA I\( 82.095 I'OSIAGI: 11Y I'110\1: 34.120 PPS LTD 79.696 PROPF:SSIO\AL V11--Cl1AAICALL11) 172,411 IZAYI3L R\ I RECTORS 1 11) 31714 R C \1 P 8.183.962 RI (CI?IV C.R 66\FRAI - PAYROLL I A1PLOYL.R PORT 10\ 1,026,913 RFLIA131 E FLAGGING SFRVICFS LTD 27,716 RFy1DAL PAI\1 I\G & RESTORATION 42A16 R(i AR1:\AS (MAI'1 L RIDGE) LTD 461.479 RIDGIi A1I ADO\\ COMM AR I S ( Of \Clt_ 173,878 RIDGE V11 -ADO\\ COMM I FSl IVAI SOC 33,000 RID(& \11 ADC)\\S ARF\AS 46,135 RIDGE \11 ADO\\S SENIORS SOC IFTY 144,459 RIDG1:\tl ADO\\S RFCYCI IAG SOCII:TY 856,041 RIIE\VAY I R I : I - SF R V K'F LTD 83,927 ROAD 13 DYKI\G DISI'RICI 65,080 ROCKY \101 N1 A I \ PHOFNIX 90,222 ROSS SYSI I \1S INC 52,970 ROSIFRMA\ I(NGINLFRING CO\SCLTA 113,567 ROYAL I I PAGE RROOKSIDI RI AL 1) 26,648 S L A St I)PI_lI',S 59,278 S( 011 IS11 I I\I.: PAI\I-IN(i LTD 65,778 SIIADFSOF6K IA1.,A\DS(API\G 27,762 SI\1SOV' y1 AX\V'1:LL 59.400 SOt I IIRIDGI \11 CIIAyI'AI I:1D 81 527 SI'RI\GFORD, AKOLA 47,451 SIA\TIC CO\St L I\G LSD 68,573 SLRRFY F1RI: SFRVICF 75,331 I I:1_CS 88,726 FFLUS (\101311_IT),) 82.272 I I LUS \1OI311_Il') (1 F.ASLS) 39,793 1 CLL,S SI:Rb'I(I S 1\C 66,083 1 l,RASI \ OAS 350,36.1 11It \1)1:12131RD I'LASIICS 1_11). 29,355 1 IMLS \1 AV'SPAPFRS 57,972 1 Ot'RISM MAP1 t MIX& &I P \IIADOAV' 53.846 1 IZIa HL\\ C1' I:D(il. DYKIAG DISI RIC I 29.309 IRI"II_CII INDI, SI RIES LI'D 76,970 l RLI: COLORS PAIV"IING I:T I) 30,134 1 1 TRA-I i C11 CI I ANI\G SYSIE\1 I I'D 172.60C t NISOt RCI- - I\Dt'S I RIAL 43,602 VALLEY LA\DSC'API\(i LTD 137,999 VALLEY R11 F mix I_TD 65,447 \ A\ HOI TH: COI 11 F SI RV'ICI_S IA(' 31,556 WAS II SFRVICI S INC 43,152 \VLSI COAST KIAI SIOLO(iY SFRV'ICI 108,821 VFST ( OAS l OYOI A 312,374 I SIPR\ OIL SI RV ICES LID 51,135 VV'I STRIDGI SI'CUIRl l'Y SI R\ I(1 55,930 I S"I bl1 A\ SALT S 1.11) 82,532 V'11..LISCA\ADA I\( 167,543 PAVI\( I.I D 409.004 \\ OI SFI 1 1' CANADA I\C 68,014 \V'ORKI RS ( O\11I \SATIO\ BOARD 214587 \\'RAY 61201 I' 33,27,t XEROX CA\ADA 1,1 D 40289 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, section 7 and the Financial Information Act, section 2 3/4 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act SCHEDULE SHOWING PAYMENTS MADE FOR THE PROVISION OF GOODS OR SERVICES FOR 2006 Total aggregate amount paid to suppliers 38,513.039 2 Consolidated total paid to suppliers who received aggregate payments of $25,000 or less 3 Total of payments to suppliers for grants and contributions exceeding $25,000 Consolidated total of grants exceeding 525,000 Consolidated total of contributions exceeding S25,000 Consolidated total of all grants and contributions exceeding 525.000 4 Reconciliation Total of aggregate payments exceeding 525.000 paid to suppliers Consolidated total of payments of 525,000 or less paid to suppliers Consolidated total of all grants and contributions exceeding 525.000 Reconciling items Total per Segment Report, Expenditures, pg 23, Goods & Services plus Capital Variance 534,837 0 534,837 6,558,227 Expenditures in the statements are on an accrual basis, whereas amounts paid are on a cash basis. It is important to note that not all payments are expenditures and that not all expenditures are payments. It is not practical to reconcile to those sets of data. S 38,513,039 S 6,558,227 S 534,837 Explanation S 45,715,933 $ 109,830 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, section 7 and the Financial Information Act, section 2 4/4 Management's Responsibility For Financial Reporting The information in this Annual Report is the responsibility of management_ The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles as outlined under "Significant Accounting Policies" on pages 3 to 5. These include some amounts based on management's best estimates and careful judgment. Management maintains a system of internal accounting controls to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and that transactions are authorized, recorded, and reported properly. Management also administers a program of proper business compliance. BDO Dunwoody LLP, the Municipality's independent auditors, has audited the accompanying financial statements. Their report accompanies this statement. Council carries out its responsibility for the consolidated financial statements principally through its Audit Committee. The Committee meets with management nine times on a scheduled basis and at least semi-annually with BDO Dunwoody LLP to review their activities and to discuss auditing, internal control, accounting policy, and financial reporting matters. BDO Dunwoody LLP has unrestricted access to the Municipality, the Audit Committee, and Council. The Audit Committee reviews the consolidated financial statements with management prior to submission to Council for approval. It also reviews the recommendations of the independent auditors for improvements to controls and as well as the actions of management to implement such recommendations. Paul Gill, CGA General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services �r J m Rule- hief Administrative Officer Annual Report 2006 -- District of Maple Ridge The Corporation ofthe District nfMaple Ridge Financial Information Act STATEMENT OFFINANCIAL INFORMATION APPROVAL The undersigned, asauthorized bythe Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, subsection 9 (2), approves all the statements and schedules included inthis Statement ofFinancial Information produced under the Financial Information Paul Gill B8A.CGA Im Prepared pursuant to the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 9 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: May 30, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: T21-212-003 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: SUBJECT: Adjustments to 2006 Collector's Roll EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: BC Assessment (BCA) has made a revision to the 2006 Collector's Rolls through the issuance of Supplementary Roll 2006-14. The Collector is required to make all the necessary changes to the municipal tax roll records and report these adjustments to Council. RECOMMENDATION: The report dated May 30, 2007 is submitted for information. DISCUSSION: (a) Background Context: One folio is affected: The property in question is owned by a Church and the regulations governing statutory exemption for churches were incorrectly applied. As a result of a review by the Property Assessment Appeal Board, BCA has been directed to change the classification of some of the land and buildings previously considered residential class to non-profit class and exempted to comply with the statutory exemption granted churches. (Municipal tax decrease, residential class $ 786) Business Plan/Financial Implications: There is a total decrease of $1,433.26 in tax revenue of which the municipal share is $786. CONCLUSIONS: Review by the PAAB resulted in a decrease of the current residential assessment base of approx. $195,000. This report dated May 31, 2007 is submitted for information and is available to the public. Prepared bv: Silvia Rutledge Approved b Jacob G. Sorba, C.G.A. Manager of Revenue & Collections? Director of Finance App'rdved by: Paul Gill, B.B.A.; C' *A General nager. 0 orate & Financial Services Concurrence: J4L. (Jim) We Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE MAPLE RIDGE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordy Robson DATE: May 31, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C.O.W. SUBJECT: Fraser Valley Regional Library Operating and Services Agreement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The attached agreement is forwarded to Council for consideration. The agreement is a duplicate of the previous agreement entered into with the Regional Library system. RECOMMENDATION: That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to sign the Fraser Valley Regional Library Operating and Services Agreement for 2007. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: 2002 was the first year an agreement was signed between the Municipality and the FVRL. The agreement reflected the prior unwritten agreement between the District and FVRL. The 2007 agreement has not changed significantly over 2006. b) Desired Outcome: The desired outcome of the agreement and our relationship with FVRL is the provision of excellent Library services in as cost effective a fashion as possible. The required efficiencies have been achieved through regional collaboration. c) Strategic Alignment: Part of ensuring a safe and livable community is ensuring basic services are available for citizens. Maple Ridge residents make excellent use of the Library (over 60% of Maple Ridge households make use of the resource). d) Citizen/Customer Implications: Use of the Library has increased significantly (by approximately 40%) since the new facility opened and the hours were increased to include Mondays and Sunday afternoons through much of the year. e) Interdepartmental Implications: N/A 1:A7700 Recreation\7960 Library\CR FVRL Operating Agreement 2007.doc 1151 f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The Library levy has been established for 2006 and reflects the service levels described in the agreement. Council discussed and endorsed the Library budget previously. g) Policy Implications: N/A h) Alternatives: Council could request adjustments to the agreement or decline to sign the agreement. Declining to sign would result in considerable uncertainty with respect to our relationship with the FVRL. Since the Library has provided excellent services to Maple Ridge residents neither of these options is recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The Library Services Agreement with the Fraser Valley Regional Library has been very positive in terms of providing valuable services to Maple Ridge residents in a cost-effective manner. The new agreement is the same as an agreement negotiated late in 2001 with a few minor exceptions to continue to meet the needs. It is felt to be appropriate to continue the current relationship as described in the agreement. by: Mike Murray General Manager: Commu , ty Development, Parks and Recreation by: Naul Gill, B. Comm, CGA General Manager: Financial and Corporate Services Concurrence: L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer MM:ik I:A7700 Recreation\7960 Library\CR FVRL Operating Agreement 2007.doc mm ME MEFVRL PPASEP VALLEY PEGIONAL LIBPAPY 11010 FRASER VALLEY REGIONAL LIBRARY 110 OPERATING AND SERVICES ME AGREEMENT 110 ME WITH 110 District of Maple Ridge ' ' 2007 IN -1 hc ca KeI 110 act . Le"""'a""r* n*'. x THIS AGREEMENT made the day of 2007 em FRASER VALLEY REGIONAL LIBRARY DISTRICT, a district library pursuant to the Library Act and having its administrative offices at 34589 Delair Road, Abbotsford, British Columbia, V2S 5Y1 (the "Library") DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, having its offices at 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia, V2X 6A9 (the "Municipality") WHEREAS: A. The Municipality is a member municipality of the Library and is represented on the Board of Directors of the Library; B. The residents of the Municipality receive library services from the Library through the branch library or libraries situated within the Municipality boundaries in those locations as set out in Schedule A; C. The residents of all member municipalities provide funding to the Library for the operation and administration of the Library, and nothing in this Agreement affects the provision of that funding or the applicable funding formula; D. The Municipality provides the Library with certain facilities and services to enable library services to be delivered to the Municipality; E. The Municipality and the Library wish to set out their respective obligations to each other by way of this Agreement; K NOW THEREFORE the parties to this Agreement, in consideration of the promises and contributions made by each to the other, agree as follows: 1.1 Term The term of this Agreement will be one (1) year, commencing on the 1 st day of January 2007 and expiring on the 31 st day of December 2007. 1.2 Renewal Terms The parties agree that this Agreement, whether or not amended pursuant to paragraph 1.4, will automatically renew upon expiry for a further one (1) year term, to a maximum period of five (5) years in aggregate, unless either party exercises the right to withdraw in accordance with paragraph 1.3 1.3 Withdrawal (a) Either party may withdraw from this Agreement by delivering notice of its intention to withdraw to the other party prior to July 1 in any calendar year in which this Agreement is in effect. (b) If notice of intention to withdraw is delivered by either party to the other prior to July 1, this Agreement will terminate as of December 31 in the calendar year in which notice is delivered. (c) For certainty, notice of an intention to withdraw delivered by either party after July 1 and before December 31 in any calendar year will be ineffective. (d) Nothing in this paragraph affects the responsibilities of the Municipality as a continuing member of the Library pursuant to the Library Act or constitutes withdrawal of the Municipality from the Library pursuant to the Library Act. 1.4 Amendments to Agreement (a) Either party may request amendments to the operating and service provisions of this Agreement by delivering six (6) months' notice of its request to the other party. (b) Once a request for amendment in accordance with this paragraph has been delivered, both parties will promptly, diligently and in good faith make all reasonable efforts to amend this Agreement in a manner reasonably acceptable to both parties. 3 (c) If the parties are unable to reach agreement on proposed amendments within three (3) months of the notice in this paragraph being delivered, either party may remit the disputed matter or matters to the Library Board of Directors and both parties agree that the decision of the Library Board of Directors will be final and binding. (d) Any amendments to this Agreement agreed upon by the parties, or finally determined in accordance with paragraph 1.4(c), will take effect three (3) months after the agreement or determination, or such other date as the parties may agree. (e) For certainty, in no event will a notice requesting amendments to this Agreement be deemed by either party to constitute a notice of withdrawal, and any notice of intention to withdraw may only be delivered in accordance with paragraph 1.3 of this Agreement. (f) Any agreed amendments to this Agreement may be executed by separate agreement, and be attached as an addendum to this Agreement. 2. FACILITIES 2.1 Premises (a) The Municipality will secure and provide, at its sole cost, all premises and facilities within the Municipality's boundaries required for Library purposes, and will consult with the Library regarding current and future requirements, prior to any acquisition or disposition of land and improvements necessary or desirable for Library purposes. (b) Where any land and premises provided by the Municipality for Library purposes are leased by the Municipality, the Municipality will be solely responsible for ensuring the land and premises may be used for Library purposes as contemplated herein. 2.2 Furnishings (a) The Municipality will, after consultation with Library staff regarding the reasonable requirements of the Library, provide and maintain all furnishings necessary for the effective use of all Library premises within the Municipality, including furnishings necessary or desirable for use by Library staff and patrons. (b) All furnishings provided will be of a quality and standard which meet or exceed all health and safety requirements that may be applicable. (c) The Municipality will provide new and replacement furnishings as needed for Library purposes, as determined by the Municipality after consultation with Library staff. EI (d) Furnishings to be provided and maintained by the Municipality for each Library premises include (1) all shelving, racks, carts and display units for the temporary and permanent storage of Library collections; (2) computer desks or tables and chairs for use by Library patrons; (3) desks, chairs, counters, and other work furnishings for use by Library staff in the performance of their duties; (4) reading and study tables and chairs, including children's furnishings for reading areas, as required or desirable; and (5) flooring, carpeting, lighting and other fixtures and amenities appropriate and desirable for the comfortable use of Library premises by patrons and Library staff. (e) The Library will promptly inform the Municipality of any directives or orders the Library may receive from the Workers Compensation Board or other regulatory agency which may affect the type or quality of furnishings which may or must be used for Library purposes. 2.3 Maintenance The Municipality will, after periodic consultation with Library staff regarding the reasonable requirements of the Library, provide all premises maintenance for the safe and comfortable use of the premises by Library patrons and staff, to the standard of a careful and prudent owner and in accordance with any legal requirements, including (a) all premises and improvements repairs, upgrading, renewal, replacement and maintenance, including roofing, structural, plumbing, electrical, heating and air conditioning, ventilation, and similar fixtures, appliances or operational features of the premises; (b) regular cleaning, repair, replacement and maintenance of flooring, carpeting, lighting, and similar fixtures and amenities; (c) all janitorial or cleaning services on a regular basis to maintain a clean, safe and healthy environment in the Library premises, to a standard acceptable for the use of the Library premises by the public; and (d) clearing and maintenance of ingress and egress routes to Library premises for pedestrian and, where applicable, vehicular traffic, including cleaning, snow removal, ice removal and precautions such as sanding or salting, leaf and debris removal, paving and pavement repairs, lighting, and similar reasonable maintenance to ensure the safe and secure use of access routes by Library patrons and staff. 5 2.4 Security The Municipality, after consultation with Library staff regarding reasonable requirements, will provide all security measures and arrangements necessary for the protection of the premises, equipment, and library collections and the safety of Library patrons and staff, at a level comparable to other Municipality facilities having similar uses or functions, including any alarm or security systems, locks or locking devices, motion sensors, safety lighting, safety patrols or similar safety measures which may be reasonably required. 2.5 Utilities and Taxes The Municipality will provide, at its sole cost, all utilities, including water, gas, electrical energy, solid waste removal and similar services as may reasonably be required for the operation of the Library in the premises. The Municipality will be responsible for the payment of all taxes, local improvement charges or other levies which may apply in respect of the land or premises occupied by the Library within the Municipality. 2.6 Indemnity The Municipality will indemnify the Library and Library staff from any claim, notice of claim, demand, suit, action, cause of action, damages, losses or costs, including legal costs, with respect to the injury or death of any person, or damage to any property, arising from, caused by, resulting from or attributable to the premises, including their use by Library staff and patrons, the maintenance of the premises, and the furnishings excepting where and only to the extent to which any such injury, death or damage is attributable to the negligence of the Library or Library staff. 2.7 Insurance The Municipality will obtain and maintain on a continuous basis, all insurance coverage reasonably required in respect of the premises, improvements, fixtures, appliances, furnishings and other works which the Municipality pursuant to this Agreement provides for use by the Library, all such policies to include the Library as an additional named insured in respect of the collections, computer equipment or other physical assets provided by the Library, and including replacement cost insurance where prudent. 2.8 Meeting Rooms The Municipality will operate any meeting rooms available for public use located in any library, subject to the Library having priority of use for any meeting room for Library purposes. The Municipality will be responsible for scheduling the meeting rooms for public use and the Municipality will be entitled to retain any revenues derived from any rentals of the meeting rooms for such public use. 0 3. COLLECTIONS AND EQUIPMENT 3.1 Collections The Library will provide and maintain all library collections, including books, periodicals, reference materials and similar acquisitions for use in the library or libraries located within the Municipality, subject to the policies of the Library Board and within budget limitations, for use by the public in accordance with circulation and use policies of the Library. 3.2 New Libraries or Relocation of Premises (a) Where a new library is established in the Municipality, the Library will only be required to meet the obligation in paragraph 3.1 where the Library has received a minimum of one (1) year's confirmation from the Municipality that a new, additional library is to be established within the Municipality. (b) Where an existing library is to be relocated to new premises within the Municipality, the Municipality will be responsible for all costs associated with moving the collection, furniture, equipment and other library contents. 3.3 Equipment (a) The Library will provide, maintain, repair and replace as necessary all photocopiers, fax machines and computer equipment (including terminals, peripherals, drives, printers, modems, and related equipment) and supplies necessary for the operation of the computer equipment, as may reasonably be required to provide services at each library within the Municipality. (b) The Municipality will provide, maintain, repair and replace as necessary all telephone equipment reasonably required for each library within the Municipality, and be responsible for all telephone service charges payable with respect to the use of such telephone equipment by the Library. The Library will indemnify the Municipality, its officers, employees, servants and agents, from any claim, notice of claim, demand, suit, action, cause of action, damages, losses or costs, including legal costs, with respect to the injury or death of any person, or damage to any property, arising from, caused by, resulting from or attributable to the operation and delivery of Library services or the use of any Library equipment excepting where and only to the extent to which any such injury, death or damage is attributable to the negligence of the Municipality or its officers, employees, servants and agents. 7 3.5 Insurance The Library will obtain, and maintain on a continuous basis, all insurance coverage reasonably required in respect of the collections, computer equipment and supplies which the Library pursuant to this Agreement provides for use, all such policies to include the Municipality as an additional named insured in respect of any computer or other equipment provided by the Municipality for use in the Library. 4.1 Staffing (a) The Library will, following periodic consultation with the Municipality regarding reasonable requirements, provide all staff and resource personnel required for the operation of the library or libraries in the Municipality, having regard to the hours of operation and programs offered by each library and budget limitations. (b) Staffing to be provided at each library during the hours in which the library is open to the public will include as a minimum, but not be limited to, (1) Manager / Deputy Manager: 1.01 FTE (2) Librarians: 4.36 FTE (3) Assistants: 15.03 FTE (4) Other: 4.2 Hours of Operation (a) The Library will, following periodic consultation with the Municipality regarding reasonable requirements, provide library services to the public during the following hours of operation: (1) Maple Ridge Public Library: Monday to Friday: Saturday: Sunday: 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (School Year) %3 As an exception to paragraph 4.2(a), each library in the Municipality will be closed to the public on the following statutory holidays: New Years Day Labour Day Good Friday Easter Monday Victoria Day Canada Day British Columbia Day Thanksgiving Day Remembrance Day Christmas Day Boxing Day 4.3 Discretionary Closures Each library in the Municipality may be closed for one or two additional days in each year for staff training or related purposes, and the Library will provide the Municipality with three (3) months notice of the date or dates of any proposed closure. 5.1 Library Programs The Library will offer its regular programs based on the staffing complement as set out in paragraph 4.1 to each library in the Municipality. Such programs include but will not be limited to Internet Training Children's Programs Adult Programs 5.2 Special Programs The Library will offer the following special programs, based on the staffing complement as set out in paragraph 4.1, to each library as set out below: Maple Ridge Public Library: Summer Reading Club Children's Specials Author Readings 01 6. DISPUTE RESOLUTION TYA Negotiation If the parties to this Agreement are unable to agree on the interpretation or application of any provision herein, or are unable to resolve any other issue in dispute pertaining to this Agreement, the parties agree to promptly, diligently and in good faith take all reasonable measures to negotiate an acceptable resolution to the disagreement or dispute. 6.2 Referral to Committee (a) If the parties have negotiated in good faith pursuant to paragraph 6.1 and have been unable to resolve their disagreement or dispute within 30 days of the disagreement or dispute arising, either party may give notice to the other party and to the Library Board of Directors requesting the matter under disagreement or dispute be referred to a committee of the Board of Directors, to be selected by resolution of the Board. (b) The committee selected by the Board will meet as necessary with representatives of each party and use all reasonable efforts to mediate a resolution acceptable to both parties. (c) If the committee is unable to mediate a resolution acceptable to both parties within 60 days of its selection by the Board, the committee will forward its recommendations on the appropriate resolution of the disagreement or dispute to the Board. 6.3 Board Decision Final The Board will, following receipt of the recommendations of the committee pursuant to paragraph 6.2, consider the matter under disagreement or dispute for decision, and both parties agree that the decision of the Board of Directors will be final and binding. 7.1 Further Assurances The Municipality and the Library acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is not, nor is it intended to be, exhaustive of the various responsibilities of each party to the effective operation of the Library and the delivery of its services within the Municipality. Each party hereby agrees to take all further steps, and give such further assurances including the execution of any further documents, which may be reasonably necessary to carry out the spirit and intent of this Agreement. lift 7.2 Other Matters In respect of any matter, which this Agreement does not address, the Municipality agrees to be bound by any decision of the Library Board of Directors where the matter is within the jurisdiction of the Library and the decision is adopted in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Library Act. 7.3 Provisions Severable Except as provided in this Agreement, if any provision of this Agreement is unenforceable or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such unenforceability or invalidity will not affect the enforceability or validity of the remaining provisions of this Agreement, and such unenforceable or invalid provisions will be severed or deemed to be severed from the remainder of this Agreement. 7.4 Applicable Law This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of British Columbia and the laws of Canada applicable thereto, which will be deemed to be the proper law hereof and the parties hereto attorn to the jurisdiction of the courts of British Columbia for all purposes. 7.5 Notice Any notice required to be given hereunder by a party hereto will be deemed to have been well and sufficiently given if mailed by prepaid registered mail or sent by electronic transfer to, or delivered to, the attention of the person at the address set out below: (a) If to the Municipality: District of Maple Ridge, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia, V2X 6A9 (b) If to the Library Fraser Valley Regional Library, 34589 Delair Road, Abbotsford, British Columbia, V2S 5Y1 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written: MUNICIPALITY by its authorized signatories by its authorized signatories 12 61 term I Maple Ridge Public Library 130-22470 Dewdney Trunk Road Maple Ridge, British Columbia V2X 5Z6