HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-08-28 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
August 28, 2007
7:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
MEETING DECORUM
Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are
decided at Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that
you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary
and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council
Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be
reprimanded.
Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws
or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or
resolution.
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 OPENING PRAYERS
Brad Warner - Burnett Fellowship Church
300 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS
400 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
500 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
501 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of July 24, 2007
502 Minutes of the Public Hearing of August 21, 2007
503 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of August 1,
3, 8 and 9, 10, 13 and 20, 2007.
Page 1
Council Meeting Agenda
August 28, 2007
Council Chamber
Page 2 of 6
600 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
700 DELEGATIONS
701 TransLink - RideShare Week
- Michelle Candido, RideShare Week Coordinator
800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
900 CORRESPONDENCE
1000 BY-LAWS
Note: Items 1001 to 1002 are from the Public Hearing of August 21, 2007
Bylaws for Second and Third Reading
1001 RZ/094/06, 22990 Lougheed Highway and Roll #5256900006
1001.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw 6494-2007
To amend Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan to redesignate from
Residential to Conservation for the protection of Roslyn Creek.
Second and third readings.
1001.2 Maple Ridge Zoning Amending Bylaw 6480-2007
To rezone from RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS -1 (One Family
Urban Residential) and RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM -4
(Multiple Family Residential) and R-1 (Residential District) to permit the
development of 73 townhouse units and 5 single family lots.
Second and third readings.
Council Meeting Agenda
August 28, 2007
Council Chamber
Page 3 of 6
1002 RZ/066/05, 23929 and 23943 130 Avenue
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6492-2007
To rezone from RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS -lb (One
Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) and RT -1 (Two Family Urban
Residential) to permit a subdivision of 11 lots.
Second and third readings.
Bylaws for Final Reading
1003 RZ/121/06, 21544 and 21550 Donovan Avenue
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6488-2007
Staff report dated August 20, 2007 recommending final reading.
To rezone from RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) and RS -lb (One Family
Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) to permit
the subdivision of two parcels into three equal lots.
Final reading.
1004 Maple Ridge Financial Plan Bylaw No. 6502-2007
To amend the 2007-2011 Financial Plan
Final reading
COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
1100 Minutes - August 20, 2007
The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting
with the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council
consideration and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the
public and is held in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior
to this meeting.
Public Works and Development Services
1101 RZ/088/06, 11237 236 Street, RS -3 to R-1
Staff report dated July 23, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6504-2007 and Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6498-2007 to permit a 14 lot subdivision, be given
first reading and forwarded to Public Hearing.
Council Meeting Agenda
August 28, 2007
Council Chamber
Page 4 of 6
1102 RZ/104/04, SE Corner 124 Avenue and 264 Street, RS -3 to RS -2
Staff report dated July 27, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6497-2007 to permit subdivision into 8 lots, be read a
first time and forwarded to Public Hearing.
1103 RZ/040/06, 11943, 11935, 11929 Burnett Street, RS -1 to RM -2
Staff report dated August 8, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6484-2007 to permit the construction of a 65 unit
apartment building, be read a first time and forwarded to Public Hearing.
1104 RZ/102/03, 25274 Bosonworth Avenue and 25183 108 Avenue, A-2 to
RG -2
Staff report dated August 9, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6499-2007 and Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6500-2007 to permit subdivision into 106 single-
family strata lots, be read a first time and forwarded to Public Hearing.
1105 VP/045/07, 22589 121 Avenue
Staff report dated July 23, 2007 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign VP/045/07 to waive the requirement for concrete
curb and gutter, sidewalk, boulevard treatment and the requirement to
upgrade streets fronting the site to a Collector street standard.
1106 Award of Contract, Watermain Crossings, Lougheed Highway at Laity Street
and Ridge Meadows Hospital 240 M East
Staff report dated August 10, 2007 recommending that Contract 0-2007-
51 be awarded to Kamloops Augering and Boring Ltd. and that the Mayor
and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal the contract.
1107 Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 123/07, Mclvor Avenue
and 202 Street
Staff report dated July 16, 2007 recommending that Latecomer Charges be
imposed and that the Mayor and the Corporate Officer be authorized to
sign and seal Latecomer Agreement LC 123/07.
Council Meeting Agenda
August 28, 2007
Council Chamber
Page 5 of 6
1108 Terry Fox Run, Use of Streets
Staff report dated August 7, 2007 recommending the use of municipal
streets be authorized for the Terry Fox Run on Sunday, September 16,
2007.
Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police)
Community Development and Recreation Service
1131 Maple Ridge Bowling Green Renovation Loan
Staff report dated August 14, 2007 recommending the approval of a
request by the Maple Ridge Lawn Bowling Club's for an additional $15,000
to be added to the original loan amount of $30,000.
Correspondence
Other Committee Issues
1200 STAFF REPORTS
1201 Award of Contract, Road Improvements, 132 Avenue (Fern Crescent) from
232 Street to Balsam Street
Staff report dated August 16, 2007 recommending that Contract E02-010-
108 be awarded to Double M Excavating Ltd. and that the Mayor and the
Corporate Officer be authorized to execute both the contract and the
TransLink Contribution Agreement.
1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL
Economic Advisory Commission Appointments
(from the July 23, 2007 Closed Council)
Ridge Meadows Youth & Justice Advocacy Association Lease
(from the July 23, 2007 Closed Council)
Council Meeting Agenda
August 28, 2007
Council Chamber
Page 6 of 6
1400 MAYOR'S REPORT
1500 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS
1600 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
1700 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING
1800 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
1900 ADJOURNMENT
QUESTION PERIOD
The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to
ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of
Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
If a member of the public has a concern related to a Municipal staff member, it
should be brought to the attention of the Mayor and/or Chief Administrative Officer
in a private meeting.
The decision to televise the Question Period is subject to review.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes only to ask their question (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium).
Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual
members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes.
If a question cannot be answered, it will be responded to at a later date at a
subsequent Council Meeting.
Other opportunities to address Council may be available through the Clerk's
Department who can be contacted at (604) 463-5221.
CORPORATIQN OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
August 1, 2007
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Mayor Gordon Robson
Chairman
J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
Member K. Kirk, Recording Secretary
1. JACOBSON, DARCY
LEGAL: Lot 12, Section 27, Township 12, NWD, Plan BCP24019
LOCATION: 13183Shoesmith Crescent
OWNER: Darcy Jacobson
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Covonant-SunnpPunnp
2. Dp/060/08
LEGAL: SW1/4 of NW1/4, Sec. 19, Township 15, NWD, except:
Firstly: Part dedicated Park on Plan BCP11412; Secondly:
Part Subdivided by Plan BCP13892
LOCATION: 12450 264 Street
OWNER: John Bakker & Eileen McLeod
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Watercourse Preservation Agreement
3. SD/003/07
LEGAL: Lot A, Section 10, Township 12, NWD, Plan BCP25215
LOCATION: 24185 106B Avenue
503
OWNER: Genstar Titleco Ltd.
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Release of Sanitary Sewer Agreement Covenant
(BP62898)
THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING
DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO DARCYJACOBSON, DP/060/06 AND SD/003/07.
CARRIED
Mayor Gordon Robson
Chairman
2
J. Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
Member
15 52
13219 13216
14
53
13213 13210
3 co
13207
2
54
13206
0_
13205 / 55
13201 13202
11
PARK
BCP 7889
13188
19 I 18
13191
co
20 17
13178 13181
13168
0
21 m 16
22
13158
13171
23
13148
15
13161
24
13138
14
13151
13128 25
13
13141
12
13131
26
13118
11
13121
27
13108
10
13111
28
13098
29
13088
9
co 13101
rn 8
n 13091
30
4 41174
U
m
Distract of
Pitt Meadows
7
___ _sand
18
17
13186
8
13176
cL
0
J
Subject Property
7
13166
15
13157
BCP 24019
P 2622
8
C
0
iN
A
13183 Shoesmith Crescent
SCALE 1:1,500
1,/ District of
Langley
111
MAPLE RIDGE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Jul 31, 2007 FILE: Untitled BY: JV
126 AVE.
LJBJECT PROPERTY
1243°
12322
District of
Pitt Meadows:
District of
Langley
12450 264 STREET
2 CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
co 4% 111***^ -L -di •0"1 MAPLE RIDGE
0 MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SCALE 1:4,000
DATE: Jul 19, 2006 FILE: SD/060/06 BY: PC
SUBJECT PROPERTY
District of
Pitt Meadows
1
District of Mission
SCALE 1:2,500
District of
Langley
24185 106B AVENUE
PHASE 1
Onitaim..01,
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
MAPLERIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Dec 28, 2006 FILE: SD/124/06
BY: PC
a
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
August 3, 2007
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Mayor Gordon Robson
Chairman
PauI Gui, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Member Karla Kirk, Recording Secretary
1. SD/05506
LEGAL:
Lot 3O.Section 3,Township 12,Plan 3S561&Lot 31,
Section 3.Township 13.Plan 39501.NVVD
LOCATION: 24180 & 24208 102 Avenue
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Subdivision Servicing Agreement
Watercourse Preservation Agreement
Covenants - Geotechnical, No -Build & SROW (drainage)
THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING
DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO SD/055/06.
Chairman
CARRIED
c�r
,�u.`zU|,AotnQ Chief Administrative Officer
Member
102 B A7E.
/2 8 8
21 22 23
\
24 25 6
LIvP 1t
27 28 2930
57
N N V
3137 36 3534
ECP3 3E_ /
33
32
/
V
Y s
F
'
1
ii 5,
2 3
N
Fi
4
ByF3139
5
N
7
N
Fi
8
30
31
32
20
1
18
17
16
15
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
37
0
m
m
LMP 48057
N
,,,8
\•
,.y
N
chi_
N
N
8_8
N/
102 A AVE.
2
a
3
8
4
P
6
5
7
7y7
8
10
1'
13
10
•
/
5
6
L
7
8 98
O O
.)5.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
BC
17
N N
N_ N
P 3139
„, 2
1—
Q
N
s
313029
V
Y s
28
n
27
1
ii 5,
2 3
N
Fi
4
O
4
5
N
7
N
Fi
8
•
22
3Cp 3139
23 24 25 26
N_
m �
ty_N
/
N
9
8
8
7
6
8
5
f BCP 313]3
BCP 9309
Rem. B
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
BCP 1
14
19526
15
8
B
(P 19526)
A
(P 19526)
21
P 19526
\BCP 20970
PARK
8630
EM. 5
56
55
8
53
LWP5
52
51,50 249
684
48
47
46
44
10085
45
1— 43
10098
Q 110088
/
"4- 42
HILL AVE.
37
8
38
39
N
40
N
4142
36295
43
8
44
m
45
N
46
8
47
/
LAE
LMP
2
N
2
N
36495
3619E'
Nh
N
112
N
N
2913
5
N
•
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34 3E
36
8
N,
8
n
N
N
+
N_
8
N
N
N
♦
N V
N N
8
AAv
CO
0') A
M
a
J
\
8
15
8
LMF
18
3
19
6-95
20
21
9
22
23
24
8
25
26
102 AVE
31
P 39561
0
n2
N
3
_MP
4 5
V
362
6 718
9
8
10
111:
N N
13
LMP 35918
•
H
0)
M
10213 AVE.
t7 p
1081
081
31
L
111
N
8
a1
31111
36295
911
3
1222312412312612
d
\ N
2
N
LMP
2
N
2
N
(+Y_
3619E'
Nh
N
112
N
N
2913
5
N
~
N
102 A AVE.
/
3
1341333d371333914.
\ M' 3E295
BCP 3283
14`1494314LiMP 14 915,15152
411434
ry
Y N
N n N N N
PARK
CP 18974
Rem. 32
9561
PARK
BCP 18974
Rem.
W 1/2 of 2
E1/2of2
P 17126
PARK
BCP 18974
LMP 34684
•
P 45949
Rem 41
BCP 12'450
1 20 19
/
rn
Q
M
("1
1G
J
101 A A\
8
8
3
/ \
4
B
5
1"7
BCP 13188
PARK
cope
10092
10088
10084
V 10080
N 10078
10070 N.
\ V / \ V /
100 B AVE.
csi
M
a
117
M
10095
L010091
jn10087
8 810083
„10079
J C010075
10098 �p
10094
,0098 j
10082 �d
10078 tr,�
10074
\ /
N
21 20 19 18 17 16 15
PARK (Rem)
14
13
G10113'
210109
10105
510097
v (010093
m010089
X10085
5� 10081
10077
12
11
8
10
24180 & 24208 102 AVENUE
SCALE 1:2,500
8
9
1-
d
rm
N
10
10'
101
1
3
100
a
on
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
•11.11111%,10,06,
MAPLE RIDGE
MAPLEAPLLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Jun 13, 2006 FILE: DP/056/06 BY: PC
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMFTEE
MINUTES
August 8, 2007
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Craig Speh-s, Acting Mayor
Chairman
Paul 8U[ Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Member A.Allen, Recording Secretary
1. SD/055/06
LEGAL: Lot 30.Section 3.Township 12,Plan 39501&
Lot 31,Section 3,Township 12.Plan 3&581
LOCATION: 24180 102 Ave & 24208 102 Ave
OWNER: Ku|beorSingh Joha|,RajdeepSingh Snhi.James
Victor Pornuand Pernnpou|Singh Deo|
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Covenant - Statutory Right of Way (Drainage)
THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORJZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDJNG
DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SD/055/06
CARRIED
Cra =� irs.ActinQMayor Pau'1GitI,Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Chairman Member
f1(SIJSfISIISCIS1Is1��f'I�aW���"���. ��
102 B AVE.
21
•
0
22
0 0
2354'
25 26
P j1 t
57
28
29
30
3137
36
35
3'
34
3£
33
32
/
37
LMP 48057
20
0
19
18
17
16115
14
B
16
17
3
18
19
20
21
N
102 A AVE.
10
0
2
3
4
LMP
6
5
7
75,7
10
15
a
1413
3C?
12
130
/
6
LMP
0
48
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
BGP 3139
2
1—
NQ
4
/A2f2i
L
28
N
_Q
8�
36295
31
N
`me
33
N
34
N
ao�
•
36
N/
24
N
Q
26
Q
Q
QC
d
LMP
1N
330292827
36295
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BCP
495
8
s3C1P 3139
22 23 24 25 26
\ h
BCP 9309
/
Rem. B
9
8
7
6
5
( BCP 313F
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
BCP 1
14
19526
15
B
(P 19526)
A
(P 19526)
21
P 19526
,BCP 20970
PARK
18630
EM. 5
43
37
14,
38
39
LMP
41 42
36295
40
4
43
44
45
ip
46
47
C
27
r
L
28
N
v1F
29
N
30
N
36295
31
N
32
N
33
N
34
N
35
N
N
•
36
N/
co
w
In
co
n.
2
J
A
14
15
1'6:17
L
F
18
362,95
19
20
21
.
22
Q
23
24
N
25
Q
26
2
3
_MP
4 5
3 295
617 8
9
10
11
12
13
102 AVE
30
P 39561
31
LMP 35918
102 B AVE.
N
OD
O
�
�
'O
Y
N
V
m
N
F4
t?
♦
YN
10431091311113131411311111
LMP
36295
1yy2212'312412
M8
A N
N
LM
,C''
N
^
M
N
2`312P12312913
N
a7
h
3629f�
N
O
N
N
N
.
4Y
R
g
M
N
/
102 A AVE.
V m
N
3333371N 3314
( M' 3t'295
714N
114
14
484
4
z BCP 3283
481491535 5
•
PARK
BCP 18974
Rem. 32
P°39561
PARK
BCP 18974
Rem.
W 1/2 of 2
E 1/2 of 2
P 17126
PARK
BCP 18974
10096
10092 4
10088 41
10084 4
10080 V
10076 'may.
10070 a
M
'10095
40 010091
tA;7)10087
M X10083
.y 10079
—1x010075
1
10098
LMP 34684
8 P 45949
5 Rem 41
BCP
1
>4 0
20 19
"--N /
of cl/
J
101 AAV
J2 3
4
B
5
6
7
4
BCP 13188
PARK
10094
10090 `O
ami
10086 L(1:'
10082
10078 �J
10074
X10109
F`, 10180
310097
104°'1
10093
10089
10085
10081
J 10077
10073
0
10
10
PARK (Rem)
SCALE 1:2,500
District of
Pitt Meadows:
Silver Valley
INA • Downtown)
,�Haney Ji: 91
x.;4•
ti �`It1"-11" 041
.4 4'9
District of
Langley
T
k
k
I �
Thornhill
Rive
2
N
24180 & 24208 102 AVENUE
Z
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
004
/�
�'f MAPLE RIDGE
MAPLERIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Jun 13, 2006 FILE: SD/055/06 BY: PC
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
August 9, 2007
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Acting Mayor Craig Speirs
Chairman
Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Member
Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary
1. SD/100/06
LEGAL: Lot 41, Section 3, Township 12, Plan 45949, NWD
LOCATION: 24308 102 Avenue
OWNER: Clearbrook Construction Ltd.
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Subdivision Servicing Agreement
THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL
THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SD/100/06.
Acti g Mayor Craig Speirs
Chairman
CARRIED
Pastil bill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Member
0
JC010283
(010269
Ca N 0260
37
38
L
8
39
UP
8
40 41
36295
42
43
44
45
46
47
27
L
28
MP
29
36
30
295
31
8
32
33
34
35
36
co
o) A
0)
00
0
2
J
2
O 24308
2
d
W1 8 24270
N
0 24274
p 24278
g
I._... N 24282...._1
CO 24288
24290
24351
[ 24298
14
15
16
17
21
25
AN
n
LOP
M1011'117
135136137
2
3
_M
4
P
5
629
6
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
PARK
BCP 18974
9
0
28
27
26
25 10131
M24 10125
U23 10121
PARK
BCP 18974
K
\ /
,r10099
10097
co
10095
0010093
cr,
1-
m
LMP 35918
v
CO
10260 10
00
0)10271
X10265
102 B AVE.
10258V
10252
\ 107 / \
8
(� 10257
[ cm 24302
O 24308
H
a
g
▪ 24322
(ND n 24326
- 24330
/11
3CP61
- 24338
`i
24351
[ N 24350
123124
a
12512612712512£
21
M
<74,
AN
n
eo 24386
M1011'117
135136137
11E
115
°'
112145
147143
44
43
42
41
40
39
N
LEAP
A
N
N
N
J
BCP
$93'
[24305 N l
L1AP
LMP
36295
36298
1 F '"
""-
N
(n 24388
45
3CP61
CO ▪ 24374
24345 W
24351
\
123124
N
12512612712512£
21
M
AN
13C131
6
2
135136137
13.14Q
141
147143
2
7
N
N
N
N
N
A
N
N
N
J
102 A AVE.
(..... 24304...
L1AP
1
36295
NCO 24320
1 F '"
""-
N
(n 24388
45
3CP61
CO ▪ 24374
[24379
CO
0) 24348
\
14514614714E1
N
e
21
M
AN
5
6
6343
135136137
13.14Q
141
147143
5
7
I,MP
N
:
i5
i
N
J
BCP 3283
24
BC
25
P
26
618
27
28
29
30
BCP 7533
0010253
10251
COO10249
0)00 0110247
U0010245
CO M 10243
31 10241
N/ /
0/
coco
023
A
22 21
1,1
20
P 6'
19
81
18
17
3
16
J
15 10231
CD
-4-
13 10211 -4-
J N
14 10221
[24307 A
L1AP
1
36295
48
1 F '"
""-
N
(n 24388
45
3CP61
CO ▪ 24374
[24379
CO
24383 CO
24387 O
14514614714E1
24396
19
21
3
4
5
6
6343
SUBJECT PROPERTY
,2".A,
N
N
C! 1 I /1 N f cl 1 g 1 <7 1 ,7 1
N
i
N
6 5 4 3 2
BCP 23558
7 8 9 10 11 1
101 A AVE.
/ 15
0148
0142 16 0o
10136 17 M 14
10132 18
10128 19 m
/
PARK
BCP 18974
13
10110 20\
<0106 21
10102
10096 c
10092 N
10088 00�
10084 V
22
E 1/2 of 2
P 17126
LMP 34684
8 P 45949
2 Rem 41
BCP 17490
1 20
19
co
N
0)
25 r
a
LMP 34684
2
LM
3
4
3634
5
3
6
7
8
9
18
3/ \
3
BC
17
3
3 1'
16
3
49
15
0
14
13
10
LM
11
S 36
12 13
343
14
8
15
16
17
18
101 A AVE.
4
B
5
OP
6
174
7
90
3
8
3
9
9
10
11
12
101 A AVE.
/
N
O 24368
1
N
N 24376
48
47
N
(n 24388
45
24370
CO ▪ 24374
42
41
8
W
(0 24390
24396
19
21
23
24
26
\
,MP
6343
BCP 13188
PARK
(')
1010095
10091
CO ;n10087
00
10098
0094
0)
0090 "0 en
0088 I 00
(0
M
10113
10109
210105
10097
(010093
l008s
00 10085
0120
7-
36
10116 r
10112 00 n
n / \ N
LMP
35
34
36343
33 32
8Fs
N
N
PARK
31
30
29
101 AVE.
3
2
1
[r.. O.24350 _...1
48
47
46
45
24370
CO ▪ 24374
42
41
0 24386
W
(0 24390
38
37
AP
38,343
..--
SCALE
SCALE 1:2,000
District of
Pitt Meadows:
J
Silver V
Iley
District of
Langley
24308 102 AVENUE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
~) j'""'� MAPLE RIDGE
MAPLERIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Oct 10, 2006 FILE: SD/100/06 BY: PC
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
August 10, 2007
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Acting Mayor Craig Speirs
Chairman
PauI Gui, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary
1. ACEDCO INVESTMENTS LTD.
LEGAL:
Lot 4 Except: Part Dedicated Road on PIan BCP30195,
District Lot 405, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan
7324
LOCATION: 23840 River Road
OWNERS: Acedco Investments Ltd.
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Covenant - Section 219 Fioodpiain
THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING
DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO ACEDCO INVESTMENTS LTD.
CARRIED
Acting Mayor Craig Speirs
Chairman
Paul ill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Member
RP 4027
P 21583
District of
Pitt Meadows ,
SCALE 1:2,000
Distract of
Langley
23840 River RD
MAPLE RIDGE
1•11=12'
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Aug 13, 2007 FILE: Untitled BY: JV
IOW
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
August 13, 2007
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Acting Mayor Craig Speirs
Chairman
Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administraive Officer
Member Karla Kirk, Recording Secretary
1. G|LL4N|.SHAHBU[}|N&SARAB|,hAMRAN
LEGAL: Lot 18, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster
District, Plan BCP17359
LOCATION: 13317 239B Street
OWNERS: ShahbudinGi||oni&Kamran Sanabi
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Covenant - Sump Pump
THAT THE ACTING MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE
PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SHAHBUDIN GILLANI AND KAMRAN SARABI.
Acting Mayor Craig Speirs
CARRIED
`-�
PauN�iU.*xun8Chief Administrative Officer
Chairman Member
64
LMP 35466* PARK
LMP 35466*
63
0
374
13368
3364
,13360
59
58
62
61 M
60
LO
13491
27
13481
PARK
133 AVE.
156
57
56.4
v
26
13471
25
co
0 13461
19
13345
13297
PARK \ 17 13296
cn
BCP 17359 m
m 35
`, 13290
24
W 1345
23
13441
22
13431
21
13421
(30
Subject Property
31
13322
32
13312
33
13302
34
PARK
PARK
m 16
ti 13263
v 15
CO 13257
District of
Pitt Meadows
er
36
13286
37
13280
38
13278 mIn
r-
39 39
13276
QJ
40
13270
41
13266
42
13260
I c
N
SCALE 1:2,000
District of
Langley
ID
43
13317 239B St
MAPLE RIDGE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Aug 13, 2007 FILE: Untitled BY: JV
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
August 20, 2007
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Gordon Robson, Mayor
Chairman
John Leeburn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary
1. CODY, DANIEL & LEANNE and ROBINSON, SUSANNE & LORI
LEGAL: Parcel 'A' (Explanatory Plan 15824) Lot 1, Section 28,
Township 12, New Westminster Distict. Plan 7855
LOCATION: 13429232n Street
OWNERS: Daniel & Leanne Cody and Susanne & Lori Robinson
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Covenant - Floodplain
THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING
DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO DANIEL & LEANNE CODY AND SUSANNE & LORI ROBINSON.
CARRIED
ordon Robson, Mayor John Leeburn, in
Chairman
Member
P 5116
17 18
19
Rem
5
13527
P 4 67
4
A
85
13517
2 P 11173
3
13493
P 8175
*PP154
2
13481
P 8175
A
13449
RP 11765
EP 15824
A
13439
P 38621
36
Subject Property
P 20636
13412
13429
P 20636
LMP 9042
P 7855
Rem 1
13407
P 1905
E
P 21219
P 21219
P 22378
P q -11.R
A
12
13
P 7004
District of
Pitt Meadows
.1/
- --siivervamy
SCALE 1:2,500
Albion
L i.
District of
1-<•
Langley \k'd‘
24
P20 36
9 10 11
12
D BIRCH AVE.
13385
13381
13349/59
13315
13287
23
P 20636
22
13425
20
13411
21
134
41
13374
P 30269
2 28
13336
0
42
13320
.11
MAPLE RIDGE
13429-232 St
2
P 2351
RP 8389
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Aug 17, 2007 FILE: Untitled BY: JV
11
R!D E -SHA R E
Overview & Background
•
TRANS LYNN
Ride -Share Week is an annual campaign that focuses GVRD municipalities and corporate
attention on air quality and health issues, and raises awareness of transportation choices.
The goal of Ride -Share Week is to increase ridesharing through a focused annual event
that encourages and supports corporate institutions in actively promoting ridesharing once a year
using www.ride-share.com.
2007 marks the first annual GVRD Ride -Share Week! This year's event will be held from
September 17-21, 2007.
The Goal of Ride -Share Week is to raise awareness of the benefits of ridesharing, and
promote ridesharing as an alternative to driving alone, to:
• reduce the number of single occupant vehicles on the Region's roads to relieve
traffic congestion;
u reduce greenhouse gas emissions;
YZ reduce energy consumption;
• reduce individual transportation costs related to fuel and parking; and to
x increase rideshare database to facilitate more rideshare matches
Objectives of Ride -Share Week
r To facilitate ridesharing through increased registrations at www.ride-share.com.
rt To raise awareness of ridesharing and sustainable transportation by securing corporate and
media sponsorship.
1=1To celebrate commuters who currently use ride -share on a regular basis.
ttTo encourage municipalities to actively participate and generate local interest in ridesharing.
rTo break down misconceptions about sustainable transportation through personal experience.
ttTo obtain commitments from companies and employers to participate in Rideshare Week through
promotion of the event in the workplace. .
ttTo create an awareness of sustainable transportation for commuting that will influence other non -
commuting trips.
701
!Ji JACK BELL
RIDE -SHARE
Jack Bell Ride -Share
www.ride-share.com is a free service which matches commuters with similar routes
and schedules; commuters can then use their own vehicles, find a ride in someone else's vehicle
and negotiate a cost-sharing arrangement, or they can pay a monthly fee to ride in a Jack Bell
Ride -Share fleet vehicle (vans or cars).
In April 2005, Jack Bell Ride -Share (JBR) launched a brand new service: "Online Ride -
Sharing" (ORS), a self -serve automated web application to facilitate the set-up and tracking of
private vehicle ride -share groups as well as facilitating the creation and filling of vanpool groups,
using JBR fleet vehicles. It has "best -in -class" features such as GIS -based matching, dynamic
mapping, and powerful administrative features. Only a year old, there are almost 4,000 registered
users and 175 rideshare groups formed by the software, but the potential for growth has been
barely tapped: BCAA research conducted in July 2004 estimated that over 58,000 commuters
would shift to this mode.
Michelle Candido
Ride -Share Week Coordinator
700 West 57th Ave Vancouver, BC V6K 3X8
604 255-7780 (phone)
604 301-3831 (fax)
candido.michelle@gmail.com
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6494-2007.
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Scheduie "B" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open
meeting assembed, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan
AmendmentBy|avvNo.O4g4-2007."
2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Parcel"C", District Lot 402 & 403, Group 1, New Westminster District, except:
firstly, Parcel ^C)ne^OfEP11894'
second!y, part shown on highway SR/W PIan 63428;
thirdly, part OD8R/VVPlan 71204;and
fourthly, part 0DPlan 4834.and
Parcel "A" (reference plan 3713), District Lot 402, Group 1, New Westminster
District, except:
firstly, part (1.O{)(}acres more O[less) 0n SR/VVPlan 4834'
�
secondly, part Iying north and east of Highway plan 4834;
thirdly, part subdivided by plan 101()3;
fourthly, part within heavy out!ine on highway SR/W plan 63428; and
fifthly, part iDplan LMP122l6.
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1400, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby redesignated to Conservation.
3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.0425'2006 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME the day of .AD.2OO.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of 'A.D.2U0.
READ A SECOND TIME the day of A�2OO.
1001.1
$
P 411296048so
LMP 30408
MP 4373
P 46517
LMS 2114
LMP 2118
Pd. A
0.504 ho.
11519
I/O AVE.
LMP 411
BCP 7507
/15.78
BCS 599
1.121 no
LMP 12216
LMS 1391
P 87466
19
11.517
38
17517
39
11509
4/9305
4 ,4
MP 5488 1",1)
86
5 6R 79
1ELOSKY At.
P 71276
P 30008
25825
1
0.577 no
.817 ho
3
P 14176
11J84/512 0.00500
LMP 39046 "5 AVE
LOT 2
LMP 39949
0.925 no
10
P 14624
9
P 14624
\p 14624
Rem.
Pcl. 1
EP 8328
EP 14217
0.071 ho.
Rem. ".2
13
P 71204
1.998 ha.
P 61595
P 61595
EP 10002
Rem J
RP 3829
\ A
v
R
DG
Bylaw No. 6494-2007
Map No. 1400
From: Residential
4
Conservation
AL CO
VLA
-Y PLA\ AV
\DI\G
MAPLE RIDGE
' 4 British„Columbia
1:4000
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6480-2007
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 351.C.,-
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of May;
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No, 6480-200.74
2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Parcel"C", District Lot 402 & 403, Group 1, New Westminster District, excer t:
firstly, Parcel "One" of EP 11894;
secondly, part shown on highway SR/W Plan 63428;
thirdly, part on SR/W Plan 71204; and
fourthly, part on Plan 4834, and
Parcel "A" (reference plan 3713), District Lot 402, Group 1, New Westminster
District, except:
firstly, part (1.090 acres more or Tess) on SR/W Plan 4834;
secondly, part lying north and east of Highway plan 4834;
thirdly, part subdivided by plan 10103;
fourthly, part within heavy outline on highway SR/W plan 63428; aid
fifthly, part in plan LMP12216.
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1391 a copy of which is attached herct:c,
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM -4 (Multiple Family Residcnti, l
District) and R-1 (Residential District) (shown hatched).
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200
APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of i' 200
1001.2
6
dP 4970
9i4
MP 4373
46517
6 LMP 2177
LMS 2114
LMP 2118
Pei. A
0.504 no.
n
P 63761
0.993 04 / { u1 412960.0
_
/LMP 30408
RW 87469 / 0
0.1 11580P R9
116 AVE. ` A'
MP 4111_:
8CP 7507.
ry • 1929
8C5 599
1.121 ha
LMP 72216
LMS 1391
P 71204
P 07466
LMP 5488
7ELOSXY AYE
P 71276
AI 1.206 ha
m
P 30008
7104
25825
.617 no
11384/712
3
P 14176
0.40500 4
11.575
P 14624
P 149
624
P 39046 113 AVE.
11J19
Rem A
EP 14217
11299
Rem 14
6.071 ha.
71.279
1.996 ha.
P 61595 P 61595
AP
RIDG
ZO\
AV
\DI\V
Bylaw No. 6480-2007
Map No. 1391
From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) and RS -1 (One Barn
Urban Residential)
To: RM-4(Mul.tiple Family Residential) and R— 1 (Residential
District)(shown hatched)
FLE:RIDGE,
British Columbia,
1:4000
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6492-2007
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6492-2007."
2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 14963), Lot 23, Section 28, Township 12, New
Westminster District Plan 11147 and
Lot 23, Except: Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 14963); Section 28, Township 12, New
Westminster District Plan 11147
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1399 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RS -1b (One Family Urban
(Medium Density) Residential) and RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential) (shown
hatched)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 10th day of July, A.D. 2007.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 21St day of August, A.D. 2007.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 .
MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
1002
i
1
14-
0 ha.r
.
,f)
5 —
0 ha.
51
b0 ha.
7 /
L.7
:-N /
0 ha. /
c_o
n c -N
, --,
2 3 i 4
P 11/47
22
i0.405 ha.
/
/
/
, /
1 / R em 23
11 / 1.189 ha
21ci
;
i
' RiTP 144-17
Ic\I A
0) La
*LMP 22960 h r•-)
1
t
cc
(3)
-t--
0_
L.I.J
I A
ta
.z
o
•ct-
H:
(f)
,co
0)
c\
1
13098 28 7f-ci°
I
1
,co
1'1941E:
CL0 9 1-5107
a-) 8 i
13091
13081i
\ 6
130711
1
h h
1
I
Li
u)
29
13088 P
30
13078
31
13068
1 11Ba--).
1 '' 2 hip- 3
f\ Q0
\ C\4! (\ ON
tr)
tn • 130 A AVE
_
/
BCP
PARK
0.920
7889
I
1
I
ha
0
cN,
(»
, (N4
69 59987
1--- --- Z
130 AVE.
o
0)
(N,
,
'
E y ow No. 6492-2007
Mca No. "'
-ram: RS
---n. RS—
and
Dar= ZONE AME NDINC,
99
-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
1 b (One Family Urban Medium Density) Residential)
RT -1 (Two Family Urban Residential) — shown hatched
..ti*
.0.,
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
1:1500
MAPLE RIDGE
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 20, 2007
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/121/06
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Final Reading:
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6488-2007
21544 Donovan Ave, 21550 Donovan Ave
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Bylaw 6488-2007 has been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently
granted 2nd and 3rd reading. The applicant has requested that final reading be granted. The
purpose of the rezoning is to permit the subdivision into 3 lots not less than 371m2.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6488-2007 be adopted.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on July 17, 2007. On July
24, 2007 Council granted 2nd and 3rd reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6488-
2007 with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed:
1) Approval from the Ministry of Transportation;
The following applies to the above:
The District received approval of Bylaw 6488-2007 from the Ministry of Transportation on August
15, 2007.
CONCLUSION:
As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that final reading be given to
the bylaw.
Prepared by: Jen Csiko
nning feehnician
roved by. Jane Pickering, CP MCIP
\.%
Approved by: A, P.Eng
elopment Services
Concurrent: J. L. (J�:W- IIIINI '"-
•S " , Chief Administrative Officer
Attachments: Bylaw 6488-2007
1003
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6488-2007
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6488-2007."
Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1, District Lot 247, Groupl, Plan BCP15387, New Westminster District.
And Lot 2, District Lot 247, Group 1, Plan BCP15387, New Westminster District.
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No.1397 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 26`h day of June, A.D. 2007.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of July, A.D. 2007.
READ a second time the 24`h day of July, A.D. 2007.
READ a third time the 24th day of July, A.D. 2007 .
APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this 15th day of August, A.D. 2007.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D.
2007.
MAYOR
CORPORATE OFFICER
, i
,
eN
P
eN
6 7 9
.
,
L,‹ , --.,-
eN
6 0
L,—,
c•N
. \N. ,
— — \ — 2
(:)
1 , \ ...)7 2 3
,-)
_ _I \ 2
99 1 3 4 2 1
I
7 79
1 It
rip 1 2 1 5 7
P
P 7 69
7 0
,T /
,
6BC
P -7387
P 8981 7 7 9,5g
R e
, ,,
A 'Z '-' '-- ',. ,H 1
w , '
,
H
L,-)
1 Q_.)
1 A'f-
,
3
(?)-, -i,
-, 7 7 929 9-) p 1
,..,,
1 6 cz
eN
, cr„
ID 0 N 0 YA N AVE.
----- iii-_, ,•, i c.0
''f--1
c\I
,N ^i ,
L- ,.irhr-)
. li\ ) i
c, < ‘---, '
\„,-, —
',---
,
(f)C.
7) <
)
,,.,o I
) 1 I Li)
1,, 2
EC -7 2 9 3 2
,
L - a
— -
—1H
1 n 7595
1
7 - 1 ,
n p 1
2
8
REM 1 9
3
91 5951 77597 7 75
H '---' a;•:)\\‘' ' 01,', — H — 1
,--- -7-- — --.7- \, ,,
2 ,--e,,,, -, 0,,, , b \ . , / \,, 6 /
s.i \ \ , , j \ \ : \ \ :
\\
/\ ' 1 5 1 1 1 1 4
1155A
A
E P 1 5205
acp /
77555
,, \,, N/ A
77557
2949
77
1 59 1
! ; 3 1
7
7 7599 I 7 1575
1
-) , 1 159 ,..)
—7
i
p
/1 ,._., ,
,
1
,--- ,r----7
0
/
1 186
,--.„ 1,---„ . ,---, ,
% % 5921 1 7 1595 1 ?
,-.„.„ -...„ ---, - '--, , , ,---, (--, 1 i z_.,
--
,
•N
1 .,._,,
; -7
, ,
i
6
5
— — — — — —, \ t___ __,,,,, ___ ___ _ ___14--.)
•)
. ; 1 I 1
\\• ,-Ni
i\,..5\
!k-•
•-,,,,
IL,'
IcN
1(sj)
1Lr)
Ic\i‘
Ics:),
1L),
ic\i'
I
r(c)
1,-N`'
1
IL,';': 4
lr.('
(vs,,,„ („(:,,,
i -
1‘. •
ii•N
i ' A rrpi n R
_ ini 7 Z ''_, N FA M E N D N G
\,_-7 —
o; N 0 . 6485-2007
One r7omily Urocn Resiaential) and
Pc--1b(One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
esidentic District)
41104 s .1 11%E..'./ b" E." ° • "
MAPI,_ RIDGE
/\
1:1,250
THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6502-2007
A Bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Financial Plan Bylaw No. 6449-2006
WHEREAS pursuant to provisions in the Local Government Act and the Community Charter Maple
Ridge Financial Plan Bylaw No 6449-2006 has been adopted:
WHEREAS it was deemed necessary to amend Maple Ridge Financial Plan Bylaw No 6449-2006 by
Maple Ridge Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6474-2007.
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to further amend Maple Ridge Financial Plan Bylaw No. 6449-
2006;
The Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in open meeting assembled ENACTS AS
FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as Maple Ridge Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6502-2007.
Statement I attached to and forming part of Maple Ridge Financial Plan Amending Bylaw 6449-
2006 is deleted in its entirety and replaced by Statement I attached and forming part of Maple
Ridge Financial Plan Bylaw No. 6502-2007.
3. Maple Ridge Financial Plan Bylaw No. 6449-2006 is hereby amended.
READ a first time the 23`d day of July, 2007.
READ a second time the 23rd day of July, 2007.
READ a third time the 23`d day of July, 2007.
PUBLIC CONSULTATION completed on the day of , 200 .
RECONSIDERED and adopted the day of , 200 .
MAYOR
CORPORATE OFFICER
ATTACHMENT: STATEMENT I
1004
AitaChment to 2007.2011 Financial Plan Amending Bylaw 6502-2007
Statement 1
Consolidated Financial Plan 2007-2011
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
REVENUES
External Revenues
Development Fees
Developer Cost Charges $27,277,503 $9,143,573 $13,971,231 $10,285,706 $3,325,038
Developer Specified Projects $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Parkland Acquisition $1,700,000 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000
Contnbutons from Others $1,610,801 $1,043,750 $1,000,000 $1,012,600 $1,225,000
Development Fees Total 530,588,304 $10,187,323 514,971,231 $11,498,306 $4,750,038
Property Taxes $44,169,337 $47,497,374 551,005,994 $54,727,684 $58,549,204
Parcel Charges $2,031,402 $2,073,076 $2,115,683 $2,159,239 $2,203,768
Fees & Charges $24,500,661 $25,741,093 $27,095,673 $28,580,345 $30,202,168
Interest $1,695,000 $1,695,000 51,695,000 $1,695,000 $1,695,000
Grants (Other Govts) $6,571,866 52,525,552 $2,956,466 $2,020,041 $1,999,976
Borrowing Proceeds $900,000 $4,520,000 $0 $1,625,000 $0
Property Sales $1,137,000 $0 50 $0 $0
Total Extemal Revenues $111,593,570 $94,239,418 599,840,047 $102,305,615 599,400,154
Intemal Revenues
Transfer from Reserve Funds
Land Reserve $282,819 $0 $0 $0 $0
Local Improvement Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Equipment Replacement Reserve $2,534,504 $2,154,486 $1,653,684 $2,133,816 $2,423,889
Sanitary Sewer Reserve $285,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Capital Works Reserve $4,691,680 $1,894,616 $1,011,679 $3,832,114 $1,243,272
Fire Department Capital Reserve 55,278.556 $2,513,960 $1,070,000 $600,000 $350,000
Transfer from Reserve Fund Total $13,072,559 $6,563,062 $3,735,363 $6,565,930 $4,017,161
Transfer from Own Reserves $14,311,018 $7,740,249 $7,077,904 $6,599,940 $7,208,764
Transfer from Surplus $2,391,067 $910,589 $149,709 $0 $0
Tota/ lotemal Revenues $29,774,644 $15,213,900 $10,962,976 $13,165,870 $11,225,925
TOTAL REVENUES 5141,368,214 5109,453,318 5110,803,023 5115,471,485 5110,626,079
EXPENDITURES
Extemal Expenditures
Capital Expenditures $59,217,996 $27,450,975 $24,744,843 $23,096,318 $12,981,948
Interest Payments on Debt $2,515,272 $2,436,445 $2,340,757 $2,248,361 $2,156,048
Other Expenditures $66,110,573 $66,747,322 $70,066,596 $73.749,888 $77,906,691
Total Extemal Expenditures $127,843,841 $96,634,742 $97,152,196 $99,094,567 $93,044,687
Intemal Expenditures
Transfer to Reserve Funds
Capital works Reserve $1,470,182 $693,531 $881,243 $1,393,834 $581,045
Equipment Replacement Reserve $1,658,431 $1,694,212 $1,802,903 $1,889,751 $1,957,327
Fire Dept. Capital Aquisition $1,033,726 $379,909 $306,272 $456,892 $592,902
Land Reserve 5587,069 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
Local Improvement Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Sanitary Sewer Reserve $80,000 $80.000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000
Total Transfer to Reserve Funds $4,829,408 $2,867,652 $3,090,418 $3,840,477 $3,231,274
Contribution to Surplus $0 $0 $0 $929,015 $1,824,976
Contribution to Own Reserves $6,720,197 $7,359,082 $8,011,435 $8,511,960 $9,410,915
Pnncipat Payments on Debt $1,974,768 $2,591,842 $2,548,974 $3,095,466 $3,114,227
Total Intemal Expenditures $13,524,373 $12,818,576 $13,650,827 $16,376,918 $17,581,392
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
5141,368,214
5109,453,318 5110,803,023
5115,471,485 5110,626,079
MAPLE RIDGE
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer
DATE: July 23, 2007
FILE NO: RZ/088/06
ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6504-2007
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6498-2007
11237 236 ST
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS -3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to R-1 (Residential District), to permit a 14 lot subdivision.
This application will require an amendment to the Official Community Plan to update the
conservation boundary based on the future park boundary established for this proposal.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6504-2007 be given first reading
and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
2. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6498-2007 be given first reading and be forwarded
to Public Hearing; and
3. That the following term(s) and condition(s) be met prior to final reading.
i) Approval from the Ministry of Transportation;
ii) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of
security as outlined in the Agreement;
iii) Amendment to Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan;
iv) A Statutory right of way plan and agreement must be registered at the Land
Title Office:
v) Council Approval of a variance to reduce the sideyard setback of the existing
house on the property from the 4.5 metres required to the existing 4.21
metres provided.
vi) Registration of a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant for future park land
dedication.
vii) Road dedication as required;
viii) Park dedication as required.
1101
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Existing:
Proposed:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
DAMAX CONSULTANTS DAVID LAIRD
CHRISTIANUS A DUYVESTYN
KANAKA GREENHOUSES LTD
Lot: 22, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: 39988
Urban Residentiai, Conservation
Urban Residential, Conservation
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
R-1 (Residential District)
Single Family Residentia, Conservation
R-1 (Residential District), RS -3 (One Family Rurat
Residential)
Urban Residential, Conservation
Single Family Dwelling
RS -3 (One Famity Rurat Residential)
Urban Residential, Conservation
Single Family Residential
R-3(Special Amenity Residential District), RS -3
(One Family Rural Residential)
Urban Residential, Conservation
Conservation
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Conservation
Farm
Single Famity Residential
2.818 HA
236th Street and proposed 112A Avenue.
Full Urban
DP/088/06, SD/088/06
-2
b) Project Description:
Site Characteristics:
The entire subject property is 2.818 hectares in size, however, the actual development site covered
under this rezoning application is located on the northwestern corner of the subject parcel and is
approximately 9048 m2 (2.23 acres) in size. To the west there is a single family residence on a
1.5ha. lot. The lot to the south has a current application for a mix of townhouse and single family
units. The area to the north is a R-1 (Residential District) subdivision created in 2003 and lands to
the east are vacant as they are designated conservation in the Official Community Plan. The area
adjacent to 236th Street is relatively flat; the eastern portion of the site consists of a moderately
steep slope.
According to the District's mapping system, there are three known tributaries of Cottonwood Creek
on the western portion of this property. The riparian protection area will be dedicated as park as a
condition of zoning the site.
Development Proposal
The applicant is proposing to rezone a portion of the subject property to allow for a 14 R-1
(Residential District) lots no less than 371m2 in area. In an effort to preserve the watercourses
located on the property the applicant will be dedicating 1.1 hectares of land located on the western
portion of the property to the municipality as Park which will be designated "Conservation" on the
Official Community Plan. Access to the proposed subdivision will be off of 236th street and a new
112A Avenue will be built to provide access to the western lots.
The southern portion of the site will remain "undeveloped" for the time being as the current property
owners would like to continue to live in their existing house. The greenhouse operations that once
occurred on this property have moved to a larger facility, however, the owner still utilizes the
southern portion of the property for bulb storage, office and other uses supporting of their off-site
greenhouse operations. The owner is delaying the dedication of a portion of land located between
the subdivision and the Park dedication in an effort to maintain farm status in support of operations
on the southern portion of the property. The applicant will be required to register a Restrictive
Covenant at Land Titles to ensure that this piece of land will be dedicated to the District at such time
the southern portion of the property develops.
It is the intention that when the current owner decides to move from the existing dwelling they will
apply to subdivide the southern area of the subject property. The subdivision layout must be in a
manner consistent with the current application and the piece of land located between the park and
the current subdivision would be dedicated to the municipality. An application for rezoning will be
required to go before Council at such time an application is made.
3
Although the southern portion of the site will remain "undeveloped" the applicant will be required to
up upgrade the existing road infrastructure to meet current Subdivision and Development Servicing
Bylaw No. 4800-1993 along both the 236 Street and the 112 Avenue frontages. Upgrades include
road widening, construction of a curb and gutter, sidewalks on the west side of 236th and the north
side of 112th, street lighting and street trees. The applicant will enter into a Rezoning Development
Agreement with the District to ensure the services will be provided.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The site is designated Urban Residential and Conservation. The proposed R-1 (Residential District)
zone correlates with the Urban Residential designation. It will be necessary to include a larger area,
from the western portion of the site, into the Conservation designation. This is based on the actual
environmental assessment for the area and the District Streamside Setback map. The conservation
area will provide the protection for the Cottonwood Creek tributaries found in this section of the
subject property.
Zoning Bylaw:
The rezoning proposal requests a portion of the site be rezoned to R-1 (Residential District) with the
remainder of the site maintaining the current RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) zone.
This proposal requires the need for one variance to the zoning bylaw. A survey has found that the
existing house located on the southern portion of the property retaining the RS -3 (One Family Rural
Residential) zone is located 4.21 metres from the side property line where 4.5 metres is required.
The variance request will be formalized for Council's consideration when the Development Permit
and Variance Permit application is presented for consideration.
Development Permits:
The site is subject to Watercourse Protection Development Permit. As per Section 8.9 of the Official
Community Plan, it will be necessary for the applicant to obtain a Watercourse Protection
Development Permit prior to any works occurring within 50 meters of the top of bank of any of the
tributaries of Cottonwood Creek. The applicant will be providing park land dedication for the riparian
area for protection of this watercourse as a condition of rezoning the site. The Development Permit
will ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian
areas and a Security may be taken as a condition of issuance of the Development Permit to uphold
the conditions outlined in the permit. The applicant will be providing park land dedication for the
riparian area for protection of this watercourse as a condition of rezoning the site.
-4
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has identified that all of the services required in support of the
rezoning do not exist to the site. It will, therefore, be necessary for the applicant to enter into a
Rezoning Development Agreement and post the required security to complete the necessary works
prior to final reading.
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed
they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated
that there will be an additional 9 trees which is based on one tree per lot; final subdivision design
will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the
maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by
$225.00.
e) Intergovernmental Issues:
Local Government Act:
An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any
affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section
882 of the Act. As the amendment required for this application is considered to be minor in nature.
It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required,
including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First
Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments.
f) Environmental Implications:
Three tributaries of Cottonwood Creek is located on western side of the subject property and has a
required 30 metre setback from top -of -bank. It is the intention to dedicate the environmentally
sensitive area located within the environmental protection setback area to the Municipality as park.
As part of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit the applicant will be required to provide
an environmental assessment. The focus of the environmental assessment will be to providing an
enhancement and restoration plan for the riparian area, mitigation measures for possible retention
and replacement of trees, recommendations for timing of the construction works, and a conceptual
Stormwater management plan that meets the current watercourse protection bylaw requirements.
-5-
CONCLUSION:
As the proposed development complies with the Official Community Plan, it is recommended that
this application be favourably considered and be given first reading and forwarded to Public Hearing.
Prepared by: Jen Csikos
Technician
(_Appr-o e by.
J e Pit ce , MCP, MCIP
erector of Plannin
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM Publip Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Bylaw 6504-2007
Appendix B - Bylaw 6498-2007
Appendix C - Subject Property
Appendix D - Zoning Boundary Map
Appendix E - Proposed Subdivision
-6-
.rpe-ndix A
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6504-2007.
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "B" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open
meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan
Amendment Bylaw No. 6504-2007."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot: 22, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: 39988
and outlined in heavy black line is hereby redesignated to Urban Residential and that portion
shown hatched is hereby redesignated to Conservation as shown on Map No. 732, a copy of
which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw.
3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 200 .
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 .
MAYOR
CORPORATE OFFICER
17365
17366
LMS 3308
PARK
2.39 ha
Pct. 'A' 11355
1.58 ha
BCP 2716
PARK
1.2004 ha
23555
8
23542
11354
17355 11356
11346 g!c° 4 5
1111 33 4 , 32
71336 'cl'_. 171 3 34 2
3
2 cY, 3 6
/ \ J
113 A AVE
15
11316
co
cN
co
h
14
BCP
,,
Q:
h
13
27984
co
cc)
h
12
16
11306
11296 LMP
1
h
,o
3E1
..), •
63
,r) 5
77290
2
112 8 AVE.
112 8 AVE
16 15 14
11240
LMP 26965
Rem 19
P 35398
1.236 ha
1.24 ho
Rem 4
P 2465
1.533 ha
71224
BCP 1699
77195
111,1.
11
\ ,
\ \
1
BCP 21397
1 1
0.801 ho
a) 9
c`) 1117
00
1.24 ha
0
0.80 ha
BCP 17360
RIDGE 0
AL COVV
Bylaw No. 6504-2007
Ni,op No. 732
om: Urban Residential and Conservation
Urban Residential
and Conservation (shown 'hatched)
Y P
1 1 A AVE.
_A\ AY
\D
\G
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
1:2500
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6498-2007
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No 6498-2007."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 22 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 39988 New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1403 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1(Residential District)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 2007.
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 2007.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 2007.
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 2007.
APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 2007.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 2007.
MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
18
77364
Z /
11366
36
11366
11736
LMS 3308
19
71354
28
71355
37
11356
46 ,
7735
PARK
Pcl. 'A'
-4-
1 cocr,
5
co 8
11355
11346 ,
1134
77342
°I 1734
2.39 ho
1.58 ho
11337
71332
1133
11336 3,\_I.
2„pc-)
3
/
C 6/
7
113 A AVE.
(
15
11316
,+)
to
' ,?-.
,c) to
9
71 1
1),FiI46
co
,-)
,
16
71306
14
BC
13
P 2-1984
12
11
10 _'1..-
77305—
I
11296 LMP
1
35 63
7728
— — BCP
10
389
1
14
.
Lr,
h ^
to 1 co
BCP 2716 `5IIT.,- h
9 ,_,.. ,r)
,o1
k.
to
1129
15
11290
2
h 3
to
h
4
''''
h
h
5
-,):-
--
---- ---
23555
K. ---I2
1 PARK 8 23542
112 8 AVE.
112 8 AVE
a
,1
u 1127N
60-
1.2004ho
7
1\1
,N
\
2
/
f:‘,
'n
11267
6 5
____ 3C_F,
4
—3_Cda9
t,
7727
6N
' \ ,7
LMP
1\. 8
36163
'N 910
711.267
— —
o
1
2
BCP
3
4
24104
5
6
7
8
"25/
CREEKSI
11237
1.c.
10
N
10
h
10
CT
1.0
n
10
"--
10
\
10
,i
010 17253
22
h
h
h
h
h
1N
1\./
c\l 1 77249
P 399:
112 A AVE.
El 2 1724-4
2.827 o
/
16
`N \
'`>,'15
h
/ :Na.N \
....., 14
Lul 3
71247
I
77240
'',
I I (
111
t1
1
Rem 19
P 35398
1.236 ho
1,
ca.
eg
o),
,,n
o.,
11224
H I-
Rem 4 I I I
P 24650 I I I
1.533 ho 111
111
HI
111
BCP 169904-
Pcl. 'A' LMP 26965
1.24 ho /7795
lffr '
BCP 21397
1119'
1111
11
10
1118
0.801 ho
r--
a) 9
Ili, •": BCP 17360
0.80 ho 7
(N 8
1117
(3-'s
c3`
1.24 ho
„..2 1
,0BCP
IN
128
3
7
(6)5 7776
1
I
Rem 25
1
1 A
AVE.
,N,
1115 i7i
Y
W
ce4c!)
-...._
Cl. 26 ‘''..MINKlinhvem,..........._,...
--...01111011111111116&
l', I
,vA F -Th
,
Bylaw
Mop
rj rom:
To:
R
No. 6498-2007
No. 1403
RS-3(One
R-1(Residential
Dn7 70\L AVEND1\G
L_
\
Family Rural Residential)
District)
A
1:2500
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
11398
LMP 05464
11375
34
11386
11376
11387
35
•
LMS 3308
11364
11365
19 28 37
11354 11355 11356 11357
11355
10
N 11330
11296
36163 11287
� 1
9
23555
11290
112 B AVE.
11237
P 39988
112 B AVE. . m 12279
63
37
LMP
38
36163
3 9
.,
310
1
♦ n
2 3EC4P2
,v H
o
N
41Q
8 b3
H N
7 8
,i
N 2,
112 A AVE.
SUBJECT PROPERTY
11269
12
11
11261
(119 11257
1011253
N 1 111249
01211245
ra-
4 1311241
P 35398
LMP 26965
112 AVE
BCP 21397
(29.
11187
BCP 17360
A
District of
Pitt Meadows:
District of
Langley
SCALE 1:3,000
11237 236 STREET
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
�E PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Sep 15, 2006 FILE: RZ/088/06
BY: PC
13361S H19c7
Yr
7611
031031020 30 01 0000
STRATA PLAN LMS3308
0
re
3.13
176'0'06'(!
.�ap11�
31.616
�Im
CV
N
I
W
Ims'u- 1' 000
11191
10
ic
0
W
4
W
}
u�
A
STRATA PLAN LMS3308
11.759
25500
13403
17.035
.1901
80 ITP
\91
\ I2
\ N1fi \\
�..,^7.520 311 \
Q 17.414
r--
10423
�8__�
Im
15557
13000
1.2
PIP
11.002
I 54 .»
17.032
11407
13403
1.2
11.002
I
11.002!
13403 1
13403
11.002
124312+1
4516 5 13
5605
114000
l:G7v7
11403
15213
1.2111
,1'.002 11002 10
21 _ .11
Fa
I i
55 111
5.5
80 T1P
ry
I 14.675
I 1
20.640
24599
1 ,he
27.06E
44000
Damax Consultants Ltd.
312 - 750 Terminal Ave
Vancouver, B.C. V6A 2M5
tel. 224-6827 Fax 689-3880
112 A AVENUE t
i
235 A STREET
15000
3000
RAW
13.402
26492
4 - s\
r
18989
5.5 T1P I_- — — —, I 8.0 IIP
IL-- .121 ii i
I
189651 J
r 78.985
i I$ ma 111
1&9851
1
I
J
32485
f)
REM. 22.
7.500
/1
VED
JUL 1 1 2007
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
112 AVENUE
to /Ica
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE:
FILE NO:
ATTN:
First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6497-2007
S/E corner 124 Avenue & 264 Street
July 27, 2007
RZ/104/04
C of W
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS -3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit the subdivision of 8 Tots not less
than 4000m2 (1 acre). This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6497-2007 be given first reading and be forwarded to
Public Hearing; and
2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading.
i) Road dedication as required;
ii) Park dedication as required.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses
North:
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Damax Consultants David Laird
Meadow Green Development Co Ltd
Lot: 8, Section: 19, Township: 15, Plan: 8097
Suburban Residential
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Vacant (14 -lot subdivision application received)
RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Suburban Residential
1102
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Companion Applications:
b) Project Description:
Vacant
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Suburban Residential
Vacant
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Suburban Residential
Single Family Residential
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Agricultural
Vacant
Single Family Residential
3.855 HA
124th Avenue
SD/104/04
Application RZ/104/04 requests to rezone the property located at the Southeast corner of 264th
street and 124th Avenue from RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS -2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) to permit subdivision into eight parcels not less than 1 acre (4000m2) in area. ABM
Engineering Services completed an initial investigation on septic feasibility for the poposed
subdivision and have concluded that all 8 lots are serviceable by septic systems.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
This neighborhood is currently designated Suburban Residential in the Official Community Plan. The
proposed RS -2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone correlates with this designation.
Zoning Bylaw:
The proposed subdivision complies with the minimum lot width, depth and area requirements
prescribed for RS -2 lots as specified by the zoning bylaw.
Development Permits:
The site is subject to Watercourse Protection Development Permit. It will be necessary for Council to
approve a Development Permit prior to any works occurring within 50 meters of the top of bank of
Mogley Creek. The applicant will be providing park land dedication for the riparian area for
protection of this watercourse as a condition of rezoning the site.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department conducted a rezoning application review and concluded that there are
no servicing deficiencies. The proposed lots will be served by the municipal water system and have
on-site sewage disposal systems. The proposed sewage systems must be registered with the Fraser
Health Authority. Details of the servicing issues will be dealt with through the subdivision process.
2
Environment Department:
Mogley Creek is located on western edge of the subject property and has a required 30 metre
setback from top -of -bank. It is the intention to dedicate the environmentally sensitive area located
within the environmental protection setback area to the Municipality as park.
As part of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit the applicant will be required to provide
an environmental assessment. The focus of the environmental assessment will be to providing an
enhancement and restoration plan for the riparian area, mitigation measures for possible retention
and replacement of trees, recommendations for timing of the construction works, and a conceptual
Stormwater management plan that meets the current watercourse protection bylaw requirements.
The applicant will also be required to retain a qualified environmental monitor who will submit
reports directly to the Environmental Department for any cleaning, grubbing, or construction on site.
CONCLUSION:
As the proposed development complies with the Official Community Plan and Zoning Bylaw, it is
recommended that this application be favourably considered and be given first reading and
forwarded to Public Hearing.
Prepared by:
sikos
ing Technician
CAppro by:� - Pi • - ' _`ICP, MCIP
Director of Planning
Approved by: Fr. k Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
G : Public Works & Development Services
1
Concurrenc J. L (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Bylaw 6497-2007
Appendix B - Subject Property
Appendix C - Proposed subdivision
-3-
46pe,rdix
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6497-2007
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6497-2007"
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 8 Section 19 Township 15 Plan 8097 New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1402 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS -2 (One Family Suburban
Residential)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 2007.
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 2007.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 2007.
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 2007.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 2007.
MAYOR
CORPORATE OFFICER
A
P 19851
32
0.423 ha
.
/
4 RCP 13955 BCP 11412
BCP 13955 .I.
PARK .
4 91 Po
BCP 13955
....„
----
"- DAP 19853
Lm0
DAP 19891
- -
\
\ /
---
6977
2 6
/8CP 13933\
..?
1,1,..P 0 457 ha
Rem. SW 1/4 NW 1/4
5
ii
i LMP
27 Lm0
0 400 ha
,,8410
LMP 6975 28
LIAP 8977
0.400 50
6975
6477 K'
29 °---L
m
0 436 no
BCP 13891,
1 24 AV F
72430
.
.
P 8097
6
3.855 no.
12753
NL -
CD
CN
P 8097
7
3.855 no.
12-I22
I2J21
N 1/2 6
1 927 no
P 8097
5 1/2 6
1.927 no
72260
12227/95
N 1/2 5
1 927 no
1.110-0
A 1 08560
12215
P 8097 5 70 5 0838 60
12208
7,111
RP 10938 Rem C 0 809 60
12192
R
-3 y i a w No. 6497-2007
Map No. 1 402
Prom: RS-3(One
To: RS-2(One
'nE ZON"- AVEND
\ __7 L__
Family Rural Residential)
Family Suburban
\G
Residential)
1:4000
.. .
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
40fendix
Subject Property Map
MAPLE RIDGE
SCALE 1:5,000
District of
Langley
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Jul 25, 2007 FILE: RZ/104/04 BY: JC
4pfi7dix e
MAPLE RIDGE
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 8, 2007
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/040/06
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading Report
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6484-2007
11943, 11935, 11929 BURNETT ST
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS -1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential), to permit the construction of an
apartment building with 65 units. This development will be subject to the Multi -Family
Development Permit Guidelines to address the form and character of the proposed development,
as per the Official Community Plan. Two setback variances will be required for this building if
approved.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Bylaw No. 6484-2007 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and
2. That the following term(s) and condition(s) be met prior to final reading.
i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of security as
outlined in the Agreement;
ii) A geotechnical report which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed
development;
iii) Road dedication as required;
iv) Consolidation of the development site;
v) Removal of the existing building(s);
vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for LEEDs Checklist.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
GEOFF LAWLOR ARCHITECTURE INC GEOFF LAWLOR
CHELSEA PARK HOLDINGSLTD
1103
Legal Description:
OCP:
Existing:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Companion Applications:
b) Project Description:
Lot: 3, Section: 17, Township: 12, Plan: 22046
Lot: 4, Section: 17, Township: 12, Plan: 22046
Lot: 5, Section: 17, Township: 12, Plan: 22046
Urban Residential
RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential)
RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
Commercial
CS -1
Town Centre Commercial & Service Commercial
Single Family Housing
RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Urban Residential
Single Family Housing
RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Urban Residential
Vacant & Commercial
RM -3 (High Density Apartment),
Urban Residential & Commercial
Single Family Dwellings
Apartment
0.404 HA (4039.99 m2)
Burnett Street
Full Urban
DP/040/06 and DVP/040/06
The subject site totaling 4039.99 m2 comprises three lots located on the west side of Burnett
Street, immediately south of the commercial development occupied by Lordco and east of the
proposed 16 storey tower. The applicant, Mr. Geoff Lawlor, is proposing to rezone the subject
properties from RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment
Residential) which will permit the construction of an apartment building with 65 units. This site is
within the Regional Town Center and will be subject to the Multi -Family Development Guidelines and
the Smart Growth on Ground principles. The existing houses have been demolished and the three
lots will be consolidated as a condition of final approval.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The Official Community Plan currently designates this property as "Urban Residential" and further
defines it having a neighborhood residential designation. However, Policy 3-23 of the Official
Community Plan indicates that properties within the Regional Town Centre may be increased as
follows: In order to further the development of the Regional Town Centre in conjunction with
community goals, Maple Ridge will engage in the preparation of an Area Plan. In the interim the
Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan will be used as a guide for development. Opportunities to
increase residential densities in the Regional Town Centre may be supported if the proposed
development is consistent with adjacent land uses; and complies with the policy objectives in the
Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan and Official Community Plan.
Policy 3-22 of the Official Community Plan also identifies that a priority will be placed on residential
development within the Regional Town Centre. Hence, higher density development will be
encouraged in appropriate locations.
Maple Ridge Regional Town Centre Concept Plan:
The Regional Town Centre Area Plan process was approved by Council earlier this year and will be
based on the goals and recommendations outlined in the Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan
and the Smart Growth on Ground principles. It encourages higher density residential development
and a range of housing forms in the core area in order to help increase the population base to
support local businesses and transit and to increase public safety in relatively complete
communities like the Town Centre that allows residents to live, work, play and shop. The Concept
Plan indicates that this property be utilized for Multi -Family Housing. The proposal aligns with the
Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan in the following ways:
• The development proposal is for a medium density apartment residential building, with a
mix of one, two and three bedroom dwelling units;
• Each dwelling unit contains a balcony area, providing opportunities for informal
surveillance within the development and to the street and surrounding area;
• The applicant has submitted a green building report and the checklist outlining the
components from the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green
Building Rating System they believe the project can achieve.
Additionally, the location of this proposal next to the 16 storey tower on the west and the
commercial use on the north, the proposed higher density seems like a good fit within this
neighborhood. The front facade along Burnett Street has been stepped down to three and two
storeys to minimize impacts on the existing single family dwellings on the east.
Green Building Design:
The project architect has submitted a green building rating system checklist and a report for the
proposed development (Appendix E) and will endeavor to achieve a total of 33 LEED points (note:
the applicant is not intending to certify the building). Some of the sustainable development concepts
for this proposal include on-site erosion and sediment control during construction, heat-island effect
on the site due to proposed underground parking, landfill waste reduction by providing recycling
options, use of durable material strategy, natural light and ventilation through building orientation,
installation of carbon dioxide monitors, use of energy star appliances, potable water reduction by
use of dual flush water closets and reduced flow showerheads, water -efficient landscaping, control
of perimeter ventilation by use of operable windows, etc (Appendix E)
Zoning Bylaw:
The proposed RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone allows a medium density
apartment use and specifies a Floor Space Ratio of 1.8. The applicant has proposed a four storey
- 3 -
wood frame building with an FSR of 1.31 (total proposed built up area= 6097 m2). The RM -2 zone
requires a common usable open space of 20% of the net lot area and the applicant has proposed an
open space of 20.9%.
As per Policy 3-22 of the Official Community Plan, residential capacity within the Regional Town
Centre will be given priority to help accommodate the 7,000 new dwelling units anticipated by 2021.
This growth is expected to help revitalize the downtown area and provide a supportive population
base for local businesses and transit. A range of housing types and sizes also provides more
opportunities for rental housing and housing that may serve a variety of income levels. It provides
residents the opportunity to live in proximity to shops and services.
This proposal is an effort towards District's many efforts of achieving this residential density within
the Regional Town Centre.
Proposed Variances to the Zoning Bylaw:
The proposed building complies with the density and height requirements of the zone but some
setback variances will be requested. A variance of 1.52 m will be requested on the north side and a
variance of 1.91 m will be requested on the east side. The applicant has submitted a development
variance permit application in conjunction with the Development Permit application for Council to
consider the above variances to the RM -2 zone.
A Development Permit Report describing the compliance with the Multi -Family Development Permit
Guidelines and outlining the variances requested will follow for Council's review at a later date.
Parking Bylaw:
As per Maple Ridge Off-street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990, the proposed RM -2
(Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone requires 1.5 parking spaces per apartment plus 0.2
spaces per unit for visitors parking. This project requires 97.5 parking spaces for residents and 13
spaces for visitors, totaling 110.5 spaces. The applicant has proposed 111 parking spaces of which
13 are for visitors.
Development Permits:
The subject site is located within the Regional Town Center area. The 2006 Official Community Plan
policies speak to managing growth within the Urban Area Boundary with the highest density
occurring in the Regional Town Centre. This proposal of a 65 unit apartment building is subject to
the Multi -Family Development Permit Guidelines. The applicant has proposed to achieve 33 points
in LEED and submitted a green building report (Appendix E).
The "C" form of the building (Appendix C) is proposed with the south side open allowing sunlight into
the central courtyard/ open space. All the parking (except three visitor parking stalls) is proposed in
an underground parkade to minimize visual impact. Access to the parkade is from the south east
corner of the property, minimizing vehicular traffic intrusion onto the site. The four storey portions of
the building are located along the north and west boundaries with a stepped down of floors to 3 and
2 on the east side of the boundary, facing Burnett Street to minimize impact on existing single family
housing on the east across Burnett Street.. A Development Permit Report describing the compliance
with the Multi -Family Development Permit Guidelines and outlining the variances requested will
follow for Council's review at a later date.
Advisory Design Panel:
-4
On June 12, 2007, the Advisory Design Panel reviewed the proposal and was supportive of it due to
its location and form. The panel had the following comments:
1. Revisions with streetscape improvements and enhanced landscaping at the entry point are
recommended to be submitted to the Planning Department.
The applicant has submitted the suggested revisions and it will be a part of the Development Permit
report.
Development Information Meeting:
On July 31, 2007, the applicant held an Open House followed by the Development Information
Meeting at the Fraser Valley Regional Library on Dewdney Trunk Road. This meeting was attended
by 12 residents of the community and they were supportive of the project. Comments from
concerned citizens were via telephone calls and hand-written sheets. They were as below:
• Lordco on the north of the subject site commented that because they have had some
break-ins from the south before, they are happy that a project like this is being proposed
which will offer greater security for their own property.
• Some residents wanted to assess the value of their property and consider selling their
property to redevelop it in a similar way.
• Some residents commented that it is a good project in the right location, close to public
amenities within the Regional Town Center.
• Some others questioned why the project is not four -storeyed all around and why it is two
and three storeyed along Burnett Street.
The applicant has provided these residents with answers to questions mentioned above and other
questions related to the details of the project itself.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments:
• Road dedication of 1.5 m across the Burnett Street frontage is required to make it an
Urban Collector Standard road. This needs to match the road width to the road
immediately on the north of the subject site.
• Relocate the yellow painted center line as required at the widening area.
• Sidewalk, curb and gutter required on Burnett Street fronting the property.
• Upgrade any roads or equipment as identified in the Traffic Impact Report by Ward
Consulting Group, dated January 2007.
• Upgrade any sanitary system deficiencies to the existing sanitary sewer on Burnett Street
to the manhole no. 185 at the statutory right-of-way near the south property line of 11750
Burnett Street. This has to be reviewed by the applicant's Professional Engineer. A site
service connection and manhole are required.
• Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) is required for storm sewer/ drainage detention
on-site. Catch basins and a site connection with a manhole are required. A Cleanout (SD
010) on the north end of the existing ditch enclosure pipe at the south side of the site on
the west side of Burnett Street requires to be installed. If deficiencies are noted by the
applicant's professional Engineer, the system must be upgraded.
- 5 -
• Any deficiencies in the existing water system require to be upgraded. Burnett Street has a
150 mm diameter existing water main and the Engineer of record has confirmed a
deficiency in the fire flow quantity. This needs to be resolved and can be done by
upgrading the water main to get the required flow and providing an on-site fire pump and
emergency generator to get the required water pressure. A site water connection is
required. Relocation of the existing hydrant at the south side of the site to suit the road
works maybe required.
• Street Lighting: A mast arm luminaire is required on the power pole at the south side of the
site, west of Burnett Street. The District will request BC Hydro to install it and the
developer will bear all costs before BC Hydro installs it. There will also be an operating
cost payment of $ 750.00 required to be made to the District.
• Street Trees are required and the estimated cost will be included in the Rezoning Servicing
Agreement.
The concern of inadequate fire flow through the existing Municipal Water System on Burnett Street
is being resolved by the engineer of record with the District's Engineering Department and Building
Permit Department. The Engineer of record is working currently on a study with recommendations
for proposed solution to resolve this. The applicant proposes to up -grade the water main to provide
a hydrant flow of 264 l/sec which the FUS calculation indicates is required for the larger of the 2
halves of the building if divided by a 2 hour firewall. He awaits the results of a computer simulation
of flows in an upgraded main and will reapply these results to the sprinkler system calculations.
This will hopefully eliminate the requirement for a fire pump and generator. The proposal will be
reviewed by the Engineering Department and covered as a part of the Rezoning Servicing Agreement
which is a condition of Final Reading.
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the rezoning is completed they
will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In case of this project it is estimated that there
will be an additional 8 trees to be maintained as per the proposed Landscape Plan (Appendix E)
Fire Department:
The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and has the following comment:
• The existing Municipal water system if inadequate to supply the required fire flow quantity
for the proposed development requires to be upgraded by providing a bigger water main
from the south end of the property to the point where it meets Dewdney Trunk Road.
Providing a fire pump and emergency generator is not the right solution, keeping in mind
several other multi -family development applications on Burnett Street.
e) Financial Implications:
As per a Council resolution passed on September 10, 1990, there will be a bonding for 2.5 % of the
estimated total construction cost of the project as Landscape Security, to be paid at the
Development Permit stage. This security is also intended to ensure the form and character aspect
of the development permit along with the proposed landscaping works. The project architect has
6
been asked to provide us with an approximate estimate of the total project cost and this security will
be paid by the applicant at the Development Permit stage.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed project is centrally located in the Regional Town Centre with respect to many public
transport choices, services and amenities. It is compatible with the surrounding uses and fits well
with the policies of promoting maximum density within the Regional Town Center as stated in the
Official Community Plan. The proposed apartment building features articulated facades with
materials such as stone veneer and metal roofing panels chosen for its durability and aesthetic
appearance. The "C" form of the building promotes maximum natural light and ventilation with a
central Courtyard/Open Space and the parkade underground minimizes impact on surrounding
uses. The Green Building report by the architect outlines proposed sustainable building practices for
this project.
Although the applicant has requested the setback variances to accommodate this development, the
project reinforces the Official Community Plan vision for the regional town centre area which states
that a priority will be placed on residential development within this area hence higher density
development will be encouraged in appropriate locations. Therefore, it is recommended that the
property located at 11943, 11935, 11929 Burnett Street be favorably considered and that Maple
Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6484-2007 be read a first time and forwarded to Public Hearing.
Prepared by: Rasika Acarya
Plan i II
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurren J. L. (Jim) Rule
Tv Chief Administrative Officer
RA/rz
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A - Subject Map
Appendix B - Bylaw No. 6484-2007
Appendix C- Architectural Plans
Appendix D- Landscape Plans
Appendix E- LEEDs Checklist & Green Building Report
7
APP EN SIX
P 52750
327
57
P 46839
8
43
co
a_ 7
11969
11963
11953
2
11907
(P 21553)
LP 59674
LMP 26960
1 P.7f,_?44
SCALE 1:2,000
District of
Pitt Meadows:
(
48
1
11954
LMP 42856
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
u.
940
4)
1 14)
a
U
m
11920
A
P 86981
1
3
11943
4
11935
1D
N 5
N
11929
6
11917
•
900
236
P 61527
NWS 1739
7
1903
8
11885
9
11873
11830
214
O G004O
Silver Valley
10
0
N
N
11865
11
11851
167
P 43930
11843
Ti_
11821
1
i2
'1
District of
Langley
RfrGr
BURNETT ST.
LMP 1505
"A"
>s
P 2891
Rem. 1
P7651
Rem.
W 100'
of B
P 84291
DEWDF
158
11960
-13 7J 22904
cD
P
EP 13671
22910
O
P 57165
P53011
154
P
P 68237
229
230
231 2
158
11960
157
156
cv
P 43788
155
N
154
153
01
N
22929
15
FULLER AVE.
969
Rem 66
11940
65
11930
70
11931
64
11920
71
11921
63
11910
72
11911
62
11900
73
11901
61 rn
11890 c0
11880
M
60 0
a, 74
11891
a 75
11881
59
11870
76
11869
58
11868
77
11857
11856
57
78
11845
56
11844
79
11837
102
109
101
11932
110
11931
100
11922
111
11921
99
11912
112
11911
98 v
11902
0
43113
) 11901
97
11898
114
11891
96
11888
115
11881
95
11878
116
11871
94
11868
117
11861
Rem.93
11858
118
11851
EP 44489
A
11848
119
11841
11838
91
120
11929/35/43 BURNETT STREET
11831
MAPLE RIDGE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Apr 26, 2006 FILE: RZ/040/06 BY: PC
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6484-2007
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6484-2007."
2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 3, Section: 17, Township: 12, Plan: 22046 New Westminster District
and Lot: 4, Section: 17, Township: 12, Plan: 22046 New Westminster District
and Lot: 5, Section: 17, Township: 12, Plan: 22046 New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1395 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment
Residential)
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 2007 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 2007.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 2007 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 2007.
APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 2007 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 2007
MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
PPPEtqblx
a
12037
(� • " •• ry
_4 ll V
G V I _2L_
JI1
J I J`-'
I
6
Rem. 2
RW
26230
cn
E .t
P
84291
P 45 1-
Q
P
44292
a 2
<r
-
a
F.
*PP083 ��
22745/47 3
Rem. W1/2 A
22753 *pP091
759 EP 12239
E 1/2 A
P 52750
327
r
N
�sr LMP 1505
A
1 ro
P 77489 N
N
BCP 22903
LOT 1
0.543 ho
---L, — NBCP 22904
P 4571
312
a
N
311
to
ca
N
E
61650
ROAD
P 84291
DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD
N 57
P 46839
b
N
N
48
0
N
co
Nb
N
LMP 42856
0)
m
N
1
p —
N
o r-
N cp
r)
a.
O^
01 Lr)
N `
- r-
0)
N
co
0)
N
R
0,
N
\
01
N
bkl-
01
N
01 CO
N
ca
in
1
19 ha
71969
8
a
0
1
v
P 68237
Rem.
Pc1 1
a
220
P
229
58011
230
231
P 57491
223
224
a
218
M 1
0.621 ha
Z
-+-
7
11963
7195v
N
CO
In
v
m
m
158
157
156
P 43788
155
154
153
152
151 150
— — — — _.
49
'")
V) a.
kn
O
O
^
N
N
"q �
11953
�.
113758
,___
11960
N
N
N
N
N
N
N (),
P
1
LMP 18455
1
g FULLER AVE. 0
149
11950
1194010
3 11943
/
N69
0.610 ha
102 N .
109 N
2
17920
4
Rem 66
11940
148
11940 (0
11
(0 71935
65
70
11930 CO
A
CV
11930
77937
101
11932
1 10
11937
147 ror-
P 86981
cc' 5
11929
64
71
100
111
11920 a
146
11907
11921
11922
11921
v
ti
N "B"
6 17917
71920
1121917
77910
145
(P 21553)
77900
63
727x11
179199
7
11910
r
GEE ST.
11900
11903
98
^
11
o
n113
144
62
73
11902 <t
'1 11901
8
11900
17901
a
a
11890
SE.)
236
11885
d-
97
11898
1 1 4
143
-I')II
P 61 527
61oa
11890
r- 74
11891
11891
11880
�
N
NWS 1 739
9
71873
a
11888
115
71881
142
— — — — — — — —
1 0
60a
11880
75
77881
1187
-- — — — — — —
N
95
1 1 6
1,I-
40
11830
11865
59
76
11878
71871
a
11
71870
11869
94
11 7
11860
140
LP 59674
17851
17868
11867
LMP 26960
167
58
11868
77
11857
Rem.93
\11850
118 139
P 439301843
»858 a
77857
h
57
178108
46901 LMP 18896
11856
78
71845
EP 44489
11848 A
1 1 9
11841
i
LMP 18897
76344
214
P 58813
71827
w
56
11844
79
11837
ca
N
LP
N
118381
120 7831
<
0
778307
MAP_- R
Ryiaw No. 6484-2007
Map No. 1395
o=rom: RS
To: RM
DG- ZO\- AV`\D
-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
-2 (Medium Density Apartment
\G
Residential)
AMAPLE
1:2500
RIDGE
SPP D f X ti
t\pf Eli D X 'C
IIi
J
inn
55
Via` A� A 9 A H !
vrw ccvv.vvvvvvvvv ....
,�� i# log, iii eg .-a
W:
illiii E6 �jl gpigp p 3qyq sg ¢¢ pg
N.,.Y.. ” 13 13£3 a iiiill 41/1 11110,
���ffffe
=o ^'•^^•^^^^ •xV^•GpPdoA•a F9G2
IJGp0C401514P21 a000e000000n000000"000000aTTOCT
e v�vs�tM111w4aerl� ibsL%
''""aL:�►� .®• r„4 11111"210117 atm.
�
nom
.1117 AO& lir 41111111111116. .4111111.
ymd__ Are tellattigl
11119
mot
41111, 0104
1471:'
API'ENI)c
HHIIIOIE
MIME=
100.11S POW 9
az .4111451".
. Jr"
SRI
013wgotAr" WON r• -:AT s - °
11" ra 44 414MEWeelis..- ifereiWWW,Atirfmts
Eln — SPE NOT -41*--:-: iikinetttairmatsgt. .:.„
— zof# .4; ."5, _...ve.....40 ... - - •
glia*41174,1000nike.hteter +4 te/-- , ifi
f. 0,. Atelauvit '
wire, re,
•.2,,, ca, ,d
n 1
2
<
-,• c-
,
Friday, August 03, 2007
Chelsea Park Apartments
11929, 11935 & 11943 Burnett Street, Maple Ridge
RZ and DP/040/06
Green Building Report
A Oggiffia+10rC .
GeoffLawlorArchitectme Inc.
11242 272 Street
Maple Ridge, B.C.
V2W 1Y6
tel. (604)462-7936
Iiu (604) 462-7937
cen (601) 217-0M3
The following 'green' items will be provided by this development, either as a result of the site location and
redevelopment or as a construction solution.
1. Erosion and sedimentation control during construction to prevent:
a) loss of during construction by water run-off or wind erosion
b) sedimentation of storm sewer or receiving streams
c) air pollution with dust and particulate matter
Location of site has low environmental impact with respect to the following:
a) site is not part of agricultural or forest reserve
b) site was previously developed
c) site is not ecologically sensitive
d) site does not provide habitat for endangered species
e) site is not within 30.5 m of any wetland
f) site was not previously part of a public park
3. Development increases local density and is within the town centre core which the OCP has designated for
higher density.
4. Site is located conveniently for alternative transportation (buses).
5. Storm water run-off will be designed to limit disruption and pollution of natural water flows.
6. 'Heat island' effect of site area reduced by placing more than 50% of parking stalls underground.
7. Light pollution to be reduced by the following measures:
a) exterior lighting levels will not exceed IESNA recommended practice RP_33-99.
b) all exterior lighting fixtures to be shielded to prevent their light from crossing property lines.
c) the maximum candela value of interior lights shall fall within the building and not cross property lines.
8. Water efficient landscaping material.
9. Potable water reduction by use of dual flush WCs and reduced flow showerheads.
10. Zero use of HCFCs in refrigeration units.
11. Use of 'energy star' appliances.
12. Landfill waste reduction by providing recycling material storage area.
13. Regional material use of wood and wood based products.
14. Use of 'durable building' strategies:
a) partial use of overhanging eaves.
b) rain screen wall assemblies.
c) continuous air barrier system.
15. Positive ventilation of individual apartment units.
16. Prohibition of common area tobacco smoking in building.
17. Installation of carbon dioxide monitors.
18. Dust control during construction.
19. Use of low VOC adhesives and sealants.
20. Use of low VOC paints and coatings.
21. Use of low VOC carpets.
22. Use of entryway gates to intercept dirt at all pedestrian entries.
23. Control of perimeter ventilation by use of operable windows.
24. Thermal comfort control by use of humidistat controlled exhaust ventilation of bathroom and kitchen spaces
and temperature control of individual units.
25. Daylight and views from all occupied day spaces in each apartment.
26. Solar gain control by use of low -E glazing.
2.
Geoff Lawlor, MAIBC
Principal, Geoff Lawlor Architecture Inc.
LEED
A PPEm x E
Project Checklist
Sustainable Sites 14 Possible Points
E'DD Prereq 1 Erosion & Sedimentation Control Required
'DD Credit 1 Site Selection 1
ADO Ciedit 2 Development Density 1
000 Credit 3 Redevelopment of Contaminated Sites 1
[ELIO Credit 4.1 Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation Access 1
000 Credit 4.2 Alternative Transportation,
Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms 1
000 Credit 4.3 Alternative Transportation, Alternative Fuel Vehicles
000 Credit 4.4 Alternative Transportation, Parking Capacity
000 credit 5.1 Reduced Site Disturbance,
Protect or Restore Open Space 1
000 Credit 5.2 Reduced Site Disturbance, Development Footprint 1
lef00 Credit 6.1 Stormwater Management, Rate and Quantity 1
000 Credit 6.2 Stormwater Management, Treatment 1
EIDE]Cdit 7.1 Heat Island Effect, Non -Roof 1
re
Ilk] 0 Credit 7.2 Heat Island Effect, Roof 1
goo Credit 8 Light Pollution Reduction 1
Water Efficiency 5 Possible Points
ADO Credit 1.1 Water Efficient Landscaping, Reduce by 50% 1
000 Credit 1.2 Water Efficient Landscaping,
No Potable Use or No Irrigation 1
Efoo Credit 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies 1
Etio Credit 3.1 Water Use Reduction, 20% Reduction 1
000 Credit 3.2 Water Use Reduction, 30% Reduction I
Energy & Atmosphere
17 Possible Points
EZIO 0 Prereq 1 Fundamental Building Systems Commissioning Required
Fib 0 Prereq 2 Minimum Energy Performance i',..mu;red
E100 Prereq 3 CFC Reduction in HVAC&R Equipment Required
al 00 Credit 1 Optimize Energy Performance 1 - 10
000 Credit 2.1 Renewable Energy, 5% 1
000 Credit 2.2 Renewable Energy, 10% 1
000 Credit 2.3 Renewable Energy, 20% 1
000 Credit 3 Best Practice Commissioning 1
teop Credit 4 Ozone Protection 1
Canada Green Building Council
8
[E(❑ ❑ Credit 5 Measurement & Verification
000 Credit 6 Green Power
Materials & Resources 14 Possible Points
VI❑❑ Prereq 1 Storage & Collection of Recyclables Required
❑❑❑ Credit 1.1 Building Reuse:
Maintain 75% of Existing Walls, Floors, and Roof 1
❑❑❑ Credit 1.2 Building Reuse:
Maintain 95% of Existing Walls, Floors, and Roof 1
❑ ❑ ❑ Credit 1.3 Building Reuse:
Maintain 50% of Interior Non -Structural Elements 1
ODD ❑ Credit 2.1 Construction Waste Management:
Divert 50% From Landfill 1
❑ ❑ ❑ Credit 2.2 Construction Waste Management:
Divert 75% From Landfill 1
000 Credit3.1 Resource Reuse: 5% 1
❑ ❑ ❑ Credit 3.2 Resource Reuse: 10% 1
000 Credit 4.1 Recycled Content:
7.5% (post -consumer + '/2 post-industrial) 1
❑ ❑ ❑ Credit 4.2 Recycled Content:
15% (post -consumer +'h post-industrial) 1
d❑❑ Credit 5.1 Regional Materials:
10% Extracted and Manufactured Regionally 1
E 0 ❑ Credit 5.2 Regional Materials:
20% Extracted and Manufactured Regionally 1
2100 Credit 6 Rapidly Renewable Materials 1
du: Credit 7 Certified Wood 1
L>IJ❑ Credit 8 Durable Building 1
IndoorLLEnvironmental Quality 15 Possible Points
126 0 Prereq 1 Minimum IAQ Performance Required
gib 0 Prereq 2 Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control Required
ef❑ ❑ Credit 1 Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Monitoring 1
Elm Credit 2 Ventilation Effectiveness 1
L'❑ 0 Credit 3.1 Construction IAQ Management Plan:
During Construction 1
e❑ 0 Credit 3.2 Construction IAQ Management Plan:
Testing Before Occupancy 1
t'1 0 Credit 4.1 Low -Emitting Materials: Adhesives & Sealants 1
❑ ❑ Credit 4.2 Low -Emitting Materials: Paints and Coating 1
(d❑ 0 Credit 4.3 Low -Emitting Materials: Carpet 1
APPS-#JD(X`E'
LEED
LEED® Canada -NC 1.0
9
LEED
A PPEuD{k `E'
Ed0 0 Credit 44. Low -Emitting Materials:
Composite Wood and Laminate Adhesives 1
100 Credit 5 Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control 1
E D 0 Credit 6.1 Controllability of Systems: Perimeter Spaces 1
d00 Credit 6.2 Controllability of Systems: Non -Perimeter Spaces 1
Et 0 Credit 7.1 Thermal Comfort: Compliance 1
621t10 Credit 7.2 Thermal Comfort: Monitoring 1
L%0 Credit 8.1 Daylight & Views: Daylight 75% of Spaces 1
0 0 0 Credit 8.2 Daylight & Views: Views 90% of Spaces 1
Innovation & Design Process 5 Possible Points
000 credit 1.1 Innovation in Design 1
000 Credit 1.2 Innovation in Design 1
000 Credit 1.3 Innovation in Design 1
000 Credit 1.4 Innovation in Design 1
000 Credit 2.1 LEED Accredited Professional 1
Project Totals 70 Possible Points
000 Certified 26 - 32 points
000 Silver 33 - 38 points
000 Gold 39 - 51 points
000 Platinum 52 - 70 points
Canada Green Building Council
10
MAPLE RIDGE
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 9, 2007
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/102/03
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT:
First Reading
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6499-2007
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6500-2007
25274 BOSONWORTH AVE and 25183 108 AVE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The property located on Bosonworth Avenue has had a number of development proposals and
application through the years. More recently, in December 2004, Council deferred consideration
of a First Reading report for an application and directed staff to continue working with the
applicant. Staff met many times with the applicant to discuss development related issues and
address Official Community Plan policies. An update on the density bonus aspect of this
application was provided to Council in October 2005, and Council directed that staff continue to
work with the applicant on clarifying the related details. The density bonus proposal involves
permitting an increase in the number of lots that can be accommodated on the Suburban
Residential portion of the site, through the reduction of lot sizes, in exchange for dedication of the
lands designated as "Forest" and "Park" in the Official Community Plan into public ownership.
Following a valuation review, almost half of the property (48%) would come into public ownership.
The development proposal entails rezoning the subject property from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to
RG -2 (Suburban Residential Strata Zone), to permit the subdivision of 106 single-family strata
lots. The site is 62.7 hectares (154.93 acres), of which or 32.604 hectares (80.56 acres) is
designated "Suburban Residential", 19.437 hectares (48.03 acres) is designated "Forest", and
10.659 (26.34 acres) is designated "Park" in the Official Community Plan. The Suburban
Residential designated lands have slopes that are less than 25% and a significant portion of the
Forest Reserve and Park designated lands are greater than 25% slope. Of the proposed 106 lots,
55 are between 1/3 acre and 1/2 acre, 40 are between 1/2 acre and one acre, and 11 are one acre
or greater in size.
There are a number of creeks and a grove of significant trees identified in the northwest corner of
the site and therefore, a Development Permit for Watercourse Protection and Natural Features
will be required. The total area identified for watercourse protection and tree retention within the
Suburban Residential designation, which together are proposed as a dedicated Conservation
area, is 3.7 hectares (9.1 acres).
This site is outside of the GVRD Fraser Sewer area. Under the provisions of the Strata Property
Act, Bare Land Strata Regulations, the applicant has opted to provide a private septic system that
1104
will be owned by the strata corporation, who in turn will contract a qualified professional to
monitor and maintain the system. The proposed septic system is located above the 25% slope
demarcation line, and is 2.67 hectares (6.6 acres) in size.
A portion of land that is located within the Forest designation is proposed for re -designation as
Suburban Residential and rezoning to RG -2, to help increase the lot size of some lots backing
onto the Grant Hill slope. Most of this area proposed for re -designation as Suburban Residential
will be retained as a Tree Retention Area and protected through a covenant. Although this would
result in a loss to the size of the Forest designated area, the total amount of protected area on
this site is recouped through the dedication of the watercourse setbacks and tree retention area.
Therefore, the end result is that 52% of the site is proposed for development, which corresponds
with the 52% Suburban Residential designation, and 48% of the site is proposed as dedicated
protected area, which corresponds with the 48% total for Forest and Park designations.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6499-2007 be given first
reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
2. That Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities
under Section 879 of the Local Government Act in respect of Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6499-2007, except by way of holding a public
hearing on the bylaw;
3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6499-2007 be considered
in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Pian;
4. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6499-
2007 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6500 - 2007 be given first reading and be forwarded to
Public Hearing; and
6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading.
i) Approval from the Ministry of Environment, Environmental Protection Division, for
the on-site sewage treatment system;
ii) Approval from the Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, Fish and Wildlife
Branch, for relaxation to the stream setback requirements;
iii) Approval from the Ministry of Health, for the on-site sewage treatment system;
iv) Confirmation that the applicant has contracted with a company who has expertise
in maintaining privately owned advanced treatment septic systems (Type 3) as
proposed in this application;
-2
v) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of security as
outlined in the Agreement;
vi) Completion of a Preliminary Letter of Approval for the proposed subdivision of the
subject lands;
vii) All relevant geotechnical reports and hydrology reports which address the suitability
of the site for the proposed development and sewage system, are to be registered
through a Restrictive Covenant;
viii) A Statutory right of way plan and agreement must be registered at the Land Title
Office;
ix) Road dedication as required;
x) An Amenity Restrictive Covenant for tree retention area above 25% slope
demarcation line, as identified on the attached site plan, must be registered at the
Land Title Office;
xi) A Restrictive Covenant for stormwater management design that will maintain
predevelopment flow regimes must be registered at the Land Title Office;
xii) Park dedication into public ownership as required;
xiii) Conservation area dedication into public ownership as required;
xiv) Forest Reserve area dedication into public ownership as required;
xv) Lot consolidation as required.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: PAUL HAYES
Owner: U G S CONTRACTORS LTD
FIRST NATIONAL PROPERTIES LTD
Legal Description: Lot: 9, Section: 11, Township: 12, Plan: 1363
Section: 11, Township: 12
OCP:
Existing:
Proposed:
Suburban Residential, Forest, Park
Suburban Residential, Forest, Park, Conservation
-3-
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Access:
Servicing:
Previous Applications:
b) Project Description:
A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
RG -2 (Suburban Residential Strata Zone), P-1 (Park &
School Zone)
Single -Family
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Suburban Residential
Forest
A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
Park
Single -Family, Undeveloped, and Utility
A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
Suburban Residential, Forest Reserve, &
Institutional
Single -Family
RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Suburban Residential & Low/Med Density
Residential
Forest
Suburban Residential Strata, Forest, Park, &
Conservation
61.413 HA
Bosonworth Ave. & 108th Ave.
None
RZ/037/92
A rezoning application for this property went to Council for consideration of First Reading on
December 14, 2004, wherein the application was deferred. Council directed staff to work with the
applicant on revising the development proposal.
An update was provided to Council on the density bonus aspect of this application, in October 2005,
and Council directed staff to continue working on the details related to the density bonus, based on
a land valuation appraisal, completed by Hooker, Umlah, Craig, Lum, Real Estate Appraisers, that
would permit increasing the maximum allowable density in exchange for dedication of the areas on
the site designated as Forest and Park. Since then, community concern has arisen regarding
development over aquifers, development in the Suburban Residential designated areas, and private
septic systems. These concerns resulted in much public debate and discussion.
While these issues could not have been anticipated in the fall of 2005, the application has
proceeded as directed by Council and significant effort was made by the applicant to address the
issues related to the density bonus and the private septic system.
-4-
The primary issues pertaining to this proposal are:
• Protection of the aquifer and the nearby creeks, including Kanaka Creek;
• Ensuring geotechnical concerns are addressed;
• That predevelopment flow regimes will be maintained through an effective and innovative
stormwater management design;
• That the environmentally sensitive areas and significant environmental features are
identified and appropriate measures are taken for enhancement and protection.
The applicant was required to obtain professional expertise in each specific area to address the
above issues. Since, October 2005, the applicant has provided the following:
• Three Aquifer Impact Reports, prepared by Piteau Associates, Geotechnical and
Hydrogeological Consultants, dated September 7, 2006, May 2, 2007, and July 26, 2007;
• Two Geotechnical Reports, prepared by Valley Geotechnical, dated December 5, 2006 and
December 19, 2006;
• An Arborist Report, prepared by Arbortech, dated May 3, 2006 (which is a follow-up to the
original report dated June 15, 2004);
• Site Plan and preliminary stormwater management design for the development (see
attached).
In March 2006, the applicant provided the attached site plan for 106 single-family suburban
residential bare -land strata lots with a proposed RG -2 (Suburban Residential Strata) zoning. A text
amendment is also proposed for the RG -2 Zone, to permit the density bonus. The areas designated
Forest and Park are proposed for dedication into public ownership, in exchange for the additional
density. The density bonus will result in an additional 40 extra lots and therefore, the existing
permitted density of 2.5 units per net hectare will not be dense enough to accommodate the bonus
lots.
Through the density bonus calculation, discussed below, approximately 48% of the site (29.89
hectares; 73.9 acres) will be dedicated in public ownership. Of that total, 15.64 hectares (38.6
acres) will be dedicated as Forest, 10.538 hectares (26 acres) will be dedicated as Park, and 3.7
hectares (9.1 acres) will be dedicated as conservation area. A horse trail is proposed for the area
designated as Park and the design and construction of this item will be secured through the
Rezoning Development Agreement.
The proposed conservation area, containing three creeks and a tree retention area, is located in the
northwest corner of the site and is subject to a Watercourse Protection Development Permit. The
tree retention area is an environmental feature consisting of a stand of trees that are predominantly
Western Red Cedar. An arborist report, dated June 15, 2004 and prepared by Arbortech Consulting
Ltd., has rated this stand of trees in "good health and without major defects" and recommends that
they be retained. The proposed tree retention area is approximately 2 hectares and the total area of
watercourse protection and tree retention area is approximately 3.7 hectares (9.1 acres).
- 5 -
A band of trees, running along the rear of the properties that will back onto Grant Hill, has been
identified for a Tree Retention Area below the septic system area and will be protected through a
covenant.
On -Site Septic System
The site is situated outside of the GVRD Fraser Sewer area and the applicant is proposing to service
the development through an on-site sewage treatment system that will be located on a bench above
the 25% slope demarcation line. While the traditional septic tank (defined as a Type 1 system) on
individual single-family lots is commonplace in the suburban areas of Maple Ridge, this is the first
large-scale private septic system using advanced treatment (defined as a Type 3 system) proposed
for the municipality.
The regulations regarding septic systems of this type and size are administered by the Province
through the Health Act, Sewerage System Regulation and the Environmental Management Act,
Municipal Sewage Regulation (MSR). The proposed treatment system will be designed for in -ground
disposal of high quality secondary (Class A) effluent, defined in the Provincial regulations as a Type 3
system. Such a system is required to meet the criteria set out in the Municipal Sewage Regulation
(MSR) and the Sewerage System Regulation. The Province will require the applicant to provide a
financial assurance for any potential replacement, in whole or in part, of the septic system in the
event of a system failure.
The applicant has contracted Piteau Associates, Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Consultants, to
undertake the hydrogeological studies to determine the feasibility of developing and operating the
proposed septic system on the slope above the proposed development and also to determine the
potential impacts of the proposed septic system on the aquifer and nearby creeks.
Piteau has provided three reports, wherein they assess potential impacts to the aquifer from the
proposed septic system and they have concluded that site conditions are suitable for such a system.
A more detailed synopsis of the Piteau reports is attached as Appendix A.
A professional company with expertise in maintaining and monitoring large-scale on-site septic
systems will be contracted to manage the system. The strata corporation that will be created for the
development will take full ownership of the septic system and be responsible for the costs
associated with maintaining and monitoring the septic system over the long-term. The applicant has
agreed to inform and educate the new property owners living within this development on the
benefits of using only environmentally friendly products in their household and the applicant will
encourage the strata to enforce the use of environmentally -friendly products by incorporating the
use as a requirement into the strata bylaws.
The area proposed to contain the septic system is 2.67 hectares in size.
Slope Stability
A geotechnical report, dated December 19, 2006, was prepared by Valley Geotechnical Engineering
Services Ltd. to address slope stability, wherein consideration was given to the operation of a septic
system upslope from the proposed development. It was concluded in the report that the "proposed
-6-
site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint providing that the final grading plan does not
dramatically alter the original grade". The report concludes further "that the slopes above the
proposed development, as well as slopes within the proposed roads and lots, downslope of the
septic area are stable under both static and seismic conditions based on the 1998 BC Building
Code."
Density Bonus & Park Dedication
In October 2005, Council was advised of the density bonus aspect of this application and directed
that staff proceed to work out the details with the applicant. The applicant is requesting an increase
in density on the Suburban Residential designated area of the site in exchange for dedication of
most of the area designated as Forest, all of the area designated as Park, and for a proposed
conservation area in the northwest corner of the site that contains watercourses and a significant
stand of trees. At that time, the 1996 Official Community Plan contained a Policy 21, which
supported this request, however, this policy did not outline any guidance on how to calculate a
density bonus. The approach taken in 2005 was a valuation of density, wherein the value of the
bonus density is calculated and compared to the value of the Forest and Park designated lands if
each were to be developed under the existing A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Zone. A land value appraisal
was completed by Hooker, Umlah, Craig & Lum in September 2005, which estimated the value of
the Forest Reserve and Park at $4 million. This $4 million value translated into a density bonus of
approximately 40 lots, based on an average lot size of 0.23 hectares (0.58 acres) for a total of 95
lots.
Of the 106 lots proposed for this development, 55 are smaller than the 0.23 hectares lot size
assumption that was used in the land value appraisal. Because of the smaller lot sizes, the
applicant is proposing 11 more lots than the 40 lots recommended in the land valuation appraisal,
for a total of 51 density bonus lots.
The land value appraisal has not been updated since the September 2005 report, based on the
assumption that land values have risen concurrently.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The 2006 Official Community Plan designates the subject site as Suburban Residential, Forest, and
Park. Lot sizes in the Suburban Residential designation are generally expected to be 0.4 hectares
(0.988 acres) in size.
A boundary line adjustment for the Forest designated area and the inclusion of a Conservation area
are proposed as minor amendments to the Official Community Plan in conjunction with this
application.
City water is required for Suburban Residential land use and will be extended to service the subject
development. Surrounding the subject site are many existing suburban residential lots that are
-7
currently on well water. Of these lots, those that are located within a sufficient range of the
extended water service will have the option to abandon their well and connect to City water.
Policy 6-69 - Density Bonusing:
Policy 6-69 of the 2006 Official Community Plan supports the density bonus proposed within this
development application as follows:
To protect ecological diversity and the integrity of forested lands, Maple
Ridge will retain parts of the northern slope of Thornhill as Forest.
Innovative development proposals that protect unique site
characteristics, ecologically sensitive areas, or amenities on lands
designated Forest and within private ownership, may be considered for a
density bonus. The value of the density bonus will be at Council's
discretion, in return for the development providing an identified
community benefit.
As discussed above, the approach taken to calculate the density bonus was determined in 2005 to
be a land valuation of the development potential of the Forest and Park lands if they were
developed under the A-2 zone and what the equivalent value would be in 0.58 acre sized lots. The
writer of the report (Hooker, Umlah, Craig, Lum, Real Estate Appraisers) concluded that 40 lots, at
0.58 acres in size, would be an appropriate bonus density value that would be relatively equal to the
value of developing the Forest Reserve and Park designated lands.
If this application does not proceed through the Rezoning process, the applicant has the option to
develop the Forest and Park reserve lands under the existing A-2 (Upland Agricultural) zoning. This
zone would permit the subdivision of lots at a minimum 4 hectares (9.8 acres) in size. However, it is
uncertain how many lots the applicant would be able to create, due to the steep grades (greater
than 25%) that prevail over the Forest and Park designated areas.
The Forest and Park designated lands provide a benefit to the community. These areas are well
forested with semi -mature second growth deciduous and conifer species. As noted in an arborist
report, prepared by Arbortech Consulting Ltd., dated June 15, 2004, the Forest designated area
contains a number of "veteran" Cedar and Maple trees that were not removed when the site was
last logged and these "scattered individuals" have an interesting array of broken tops and hollow
stems that support "a wide spectrum of native wildlife". The writer of the report further comments
that the Forest has "the feel of an old growth forest".
The proposed protection of the creeks and cedar stand of trees, as conservation area, is also a
valuable community benefit, as it provides fish and wildlife habitat and will also become an integral
part of the stormwater management design for the site. More in-depth investigation of these issues
will need to occur if the development moves forward.
These areas have an existing equestrian trail route, that will be formalized through the dedication of
the lands into public ownership and the area will continue to be ideally suited for recreational hiking.
-8
Policy 5-37 - Groundwater Protection:
A key issue related to this application is the protection of groundwater. Part of the ongoing work,
since October 2005, was for the applicant to obtain professional expertise to comment on any
potential impacts to the groundwater, nearby streams, or slope stability due to the long-term
operation of the on-site septic system. Policy 5-37 in the Official Community Plan requires that the
following conditions be met in the protection of groundwater:
Maple Ridge will require an evaluation of groundwater flows, conducted by a
qualified environmental professional, for new development that is adjacent to
areas reliant on well water. Development proposals that cannot ensure
adequate groundwater flows, sufficient water quality or mitigate potential
impacts to existing and surrounding well water systems will not be supported.
The two reports prepared by Piteau Associates, geotechnical and hydrogeological consultants,
concluded that the proposed septic system operation is not foreseen to have any negative impacts
on the groundwater or the nearby streams. Additionally, two reports prepared by the principal
geotechnical engineer at Valley Geotechnical concluded that the development can be developed
safely if no significant changes are made to the existing grades.
In order to ensure adequate groundwater and creek habitat flows, the applicant has agreed to a
stormwater management design that will maintain predevelopment flow regimes, by adopting
source based management as a first principle with a goal of limiting the total impervious area of the
development to a maximum of 15% equivalency to existing site conditions.
Proposed Bylaw Amendment to Official Community Plan:
A Bylaw amendment will be required to facilitate this development and involves adjusting the lot
lines for the Suburban Residential and Forest designations and designating the area containing the
creek setbacks and tree retention area as Conservation.
Zoning Bylaw:
Proposed Text Amendment to RG -2 (Suburban Residential Strata) Zone:
The designation of this site for Suburban Residential supports the proposed zoning amendment to
the RG -2 (Suburban Residential Strata) zone. However, in order to achieve the density bonus the lot
sizes are reduced to accommodate the additional lots. Therefore, the proposed total density of 3.64
units per net hectare exceeds the permitted maximum density of 2.5 units per net hectare within the
RG -2 zone and a text amendment is requested to accommodate this increase in density at this
location only. The proposed development has a total area of 31.472 hectares and the net area,
minus the public roads is 29.1 hectares.
-9-
Development Permits:
A Watercourse Protection Development Permit is required for the three creeks identified on the
northwest portion of the site. A 30 metre seback is required from the top of bank of the creek
closest to the west property line. Two tributaries have been identified off of the mainstem and will
require 15 metre setbacks from the top of bank.
Some concessions to stream setbacks are being proposed to some of the creeks in exchange for an
innovative stormwater management design, prepared and sealed by a professional engineer, that
meets the District's 2006 Watercourse Protection Bylaw, and the standards and guidelines within
the GVRD's 2005 Stormwater Source Control Design Guidelines, as well as meeting the
performance measurements from the District's 2005 Master Municipal Construction Document
(MMCD) stormwater guidelines and Best Management Practices. This means that the applicant will
need to provide a stormwater management design that is intended to maintain predevelopment flow
regimes and adopt source -based management as a first principle with a goal of limiting the total
effective impervious area of the site to a maximum of 15%.
Other features that will be incorporated into the stormwater management plan include:
• Ensuring that development occurs in an orderly, phased process that permits effective
management of environmental impacts of development;
• Ensuring that the accompanying development plan is responsive to the physical
characteristics of the site, including preservation of watercourses, rock outcroppings, mature
trees, and steep slopes;
• Retaining and integrating mature trees into the developed area, where possible;
• Using native vegetation that is appropriate for swales, bioretention ponds, erosion and
sediment control, and for fish and wildlife habitat values;
• A design that is based on objectives for effective reforestation within 10 years that includes
criteria for the maintenance of pervious soils to meet objectives of stormwater management.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting was held on November 8, 2006 at Planet Ice. Approximately 54
people attended the meeting and were provided with an information sheet, a small map showing the
proposal, and a comment sheet.
Thirty-seven comment sheets were received and the general comments were as follows:
Favourable Comments:
• The large park dedication
• The innovative and creative lot layout
• The preservation of the "rural" look of the neighbourhood
• The provision of a horse trail to connect with other trails in the neighbourhood
• The provision of municipal water to the area with the opportunity to connect to that
system
- 10-
• The positive difference between this project and other developments in the urban
area of the municipality (lot size, green setting)
• The provision of small acreage lots
• The innovative storm water management proposal
• The preservation of the watercourse and forested area
Unfavourable Comments:
• The quality of well water could be impacted
• There will be an increase of traffic on the roads
• The need for a municipal sewer to service the proposed development
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The proposed development will bring municipal water service to the properties along Bosonworth
Avenue and these property owners will have the option of hooking into this service and abandoning
their wells.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has reviewed the attached site plan and provided the following
comments:
• A Rezoning Development Agreement is required for off-site water works.
• Road improvements are required on Bosonworth Avenue and road construction is required
on 108th Avenue, internal municipal road, and 256th Street fire access.
• Curb, gutter, and sidewalks are required on Bosonworth Avenue, 108th Avenue, internal
municipal road, and 108th Avenue.
• Sewage disposal is expected to be provided by on-site means pursuant to the Municipal
Sewage Regulations (MSR). Extension of the municipal sewage collection system is not
supportable for the RG -2 form of development.
• Stormwater management concept for the development is required and will be an integral
part of the subdivision servicing design. Works are currently underway on this topic with the
consultants collaborating with staff in this regard. The concept plan preparation including
impact assessment will be a requirement of rezoning.
• Extension of the municipal water distribution system to the property is required. This is an
off-site work that the developer will be responsible for. All costs associated with provision of
this service will be the responsibility of the developer.
• Street lighting is required on Bosonworth Avenue, 108 Avenue, and internal municipal road.
• Underground wiring is a utility requirement of the RG -2 zone and will be addressed at the
subdivision stage.
• Confirmation is required of the owner with respect to existing dwellings and structures.
- 11 -
• Consideration will be given to the extension of the municipal water distribution system and if
any part of the extension works are eligible for DCC consideration, staff will look to allow the
applicable forgiveness to flow through to the subdivision stage.
• Geotechnical considerations apply.
• Latecomer considerations will be addressed at the subdivision stage.
• There are Schedule E watercourses on the property for which senior agency notification or
approvals may be required.
• Ministry of Health approval - EBS: Professional assurance of compliance with senior agency
processing pursuant to the Municipal Sewage Regulations is required.
• The issue of dedication of the proposed municipal street through the property will be
considered in respect of the rezoning process. It may be desirable to have the road
dedicated at this stage of the process. Road dedication on the 256th Street corridor needs
to be reviewed to determine whether or not the road exists and whether or not dedication of
part of the corridor is needed to support servicing of the development.
• Statutory ROWs in support of servicing may be required in support of the rezoning. This will
be determined when the servicing design is available.
• Underground utilities are a requirement of the RG -2 zone and all lots in the future
subdivision will be serviced by underground means.
• An estimate for both off-site and on-site services (in support of Rezoning Development
Agreement) is required and will be prepared once the servicing design is available.
• Park and forest reserve issues including applicable dedication will be addressed in support
of rezoning. A hydro -geological assessment and environmental assessment of the property
are required to address issues of development impacts on the Thornhill aquifer,
neighbouring properties and the environment in general. Piteau Associates and EnviroWest
Consulting are retained to undertake these assessments. A stormwater management
concept for the property is also required and will be undertaken by the engineer of record
working with other support sub -consultants including those already mentioned.
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
An equestrian trail is proposed through the areas that are to be dedicated as Forest and Park.
Equestrians are also expected to ride along Bosonworth to access the park trails, so a road
shoulder will be required for this purpose as part of this rezoning application. The Haney
Horseman would also like a road shoulder along 112" Avenue, as a future trail improvement, to
access the park trails from the opposite direction. These items will be addressed through the
Rezoning Development Agreement.
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed
they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated
that there will be an additional 106 trees, which is based on one tree per lot; final subdivision
design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the
maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by
$2,650.00.
- 12 -
Fire Department:
The Fire Department reviewed the attached site plan and provided the following comments:
Due to steep slopes on the hill it would be advantageous to have Fire Department access to the
upward area for interface fire protection. If any trail is proposed then it can be utilized as an
emergency access and developed to a standard that would support the use of ATV vehicles (for
emergency purposes).
A site plan showing locations of fire related infrastructure, some of which is outlined below, is
required. This is to include the locations of fire hydrant, road carriage widths, strata road widths
slopes and turning radius etc.
Fire Department Access:
• All fire department access routes must be rated for minimum of 35,000 Kg with a minimum
force of 70 P.S.I.
• Lane to be posted "no parking - tow away zone".
• Be a minimum carriageway of 6 metres wide.
• Any required hammerhead turnaround to be minimum 6 metres wide and 8 metres in depth.
Fire Hydrants:
• Preferred location of fire hydrants is at main road entrances and on corner lots.
• Private hydrants are to be lime -yellow with white caps.
• Measures are to be in place to ensure landscaping does not encroach on access and
visibility and that fire hydrants can be kept clear in all weather conditions.
f) Intergovernmental Issues:
Local Government Act:
An amendment to the Official Community Plan (OCP) requires the local government to consult with
any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in
Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application is an adjustment of the
boundary to the Forest designation and also the inclusion of the Conservation Area and these are
considered to be minor in nature, under Bylaw No. 6499-2007. It has been determined that no
additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of
the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or
agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments.
Section 882(3) of the Local Government Act also requires that the local government consider the
Financial Plan and Waste Management Plan when adopting an OCP amendment.
The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste
Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and is considered to be consistent
with both documents.
- 13 -
CONCLUSION:
The subject development has been many years in the making due to the complexity of the
development proposal and its location. The applicant has retained the appropriate professionals to
respond to the issues related to preventing contamination of the aquifer and watercourses, slope
stability, and the protection of the watercourses and significant trees. If it is deemed that these
issues have been sufficiently addressed at this stage of the process, then the development proposal
hinges on the density bonus aspect.
Through the density bonus provision of the Official Community Plan policy that was in place at the
time the application was submitted, 48% of the site, which will be dedicated, is equal to the amount
of land that is currently designated Forest and Park in the Official Community Plan, in exchange for
an increase in development density and ultimately a bonus of 51 additional, albeit mostly smaller,
lots.
Public ownership of the lands designated Forest and Park and additionally the proposed
conservation area would provide a benefit to the community and to fish and wildlife. This is the
desired outcome that would result in a gain for both the public and private interests if the key issues
related to this application can be resolved.
Prepared by: L4 Zosiak
Planner
r: Approved by: Janeickering, MCP, MCIP
Direct of Planning
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
- 14 -
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A
Appendix B -
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E -
Appendix F -
- A Synopsis of Reports Prepared By Piteau Associates
Location Map
- Official Community PIan Amending Bylaw 6499-2007
- Zone Amending Bylaw 6500-2007
Proposed Site PIan
Appendix A
A Synopsis of Reports Prepared by
Piteau Associates Engineering Ltd., Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Consultants
Piteau Associates prepared three reports, which each discuss phases of Piteau's work related to an
aquifer impact assessment on the subject site.
In a report prepared by Piteau Associates, entitled "Aquifer Impact Study for On -Site Wastewater
Disposal" and dated September 7, 2006, they advise that an absorption trench must be set back at
least 300 metres from a water well in an unconfined aquifer, as required in the MSR. Piteau
provided a map showing the locations of the wells in relation to the proposed septic system area
and noted that of the five closest wells to the proposed septic system absorption trench, four are
registered and located approximately 330 metres downslope. The fifth unregistered well is located
only 110 metres below the proposed absorption trench and Piteau notes that this well will have to
be abandoned in order to meet the MSR setback requirements.
In a "Hydrogeological Assessment and Environmental Impact Study", dated May 2, 2007, Piteau
Associates outlines how the treated effluent from the on-site sewage disposal system is expected to
disperse and infiltrate through the soil. Water tests conducted on the site last spring indicated that
most of the treated effluent will flow through fractured bedrock into the aquifer below.
The treated wastewater is expected to flow northward, "away from the absorption field within the
upper bedrock" and possibly resurface at lower grades as surface water. If the effluent does not
resurface downslope, then it is expected to continue moving as interflow or groundwater toward
Kanaka Creek. "Piteau anticipates that no negative effects on groundwater supplies on the north
side of Bosonworth or Kanaka Creek will occur as a result of in -ground effluent disposal." This
conclusion is based on the following from the Piteau report:
• Processes such as physical straining and absorption within the soil matrix
remove harmful bacteria, protozoa, and other pathogens present in the
waste within a short distance from a properly constructed and operated
absorption trench system. In this instance, given that the bulk of these
pathogens would be removed during the pre-treatment stage (i.e. prior to
discharge), there is therefore even a higher level of confidence that
groundwater seepage emanating from the disposal area will not
compromise groundwater supplies on the north side of Bosonworth
Avenue.
• Perhaps the most common contaminant associated with sewage effluent
disposal to ground is nitrate. This is formed by the nitrification of
ammonium ions in sewage effluent, and is a relatively stable compound
that is attenuated in groundwater primarily through dilution. Given that
effluent pre-treatment will achieve a nitrate concentration of equal to or
less than the 10 mg/L maximum allowable concentration (MAC)
recommended in the Canadian Drinking Water Quality Guideline (Health
Canada), and that the concentration will be diluted when the effluent from
the treatment plant mixes with groundwater and infiltrating precipitation,
the potential for increasing nitrate concentrations in drinking water wells
above the MAC is not a concern.
Although some fill is required within the septic system area to ensure sufficient soil depth for
effective effluent infiltration, Piteau has recommended that "the soils in the drainfield area should
not be subjected to significant disturbance". Therefore, Piteau recommends that "for this reason
and given the relatively steep slope, the distribution trenches should be constructed using hand
digging tools or light equipment only." Piteau further recommends that large trees should be left in
place, and the seepage trenches should be oriented to avoid the trees. The May 2nd Piteau report
concludes that "conditions at the site are suitable for in -ground disposal of up to 90 m3/day of
Class A effluent into an absorption field system", but also recommends "that a knowledgeable
contractor and careful monitoring during construction are important aspects of a successful
project."
Subsequent to Piteau's May 2nd study, the applicant met with an engineering design consultant who
advised that the septic system should be designed to accommodate in -ground disposal of
133.5 m3/day of effluent. Piteau then reviewed their May 2nd hydrogeologic assessment, in a report
dated July 26, 2007, and determined that they did not need to make any changes to their
recommendations regarding the layout of the disposal field, but they did recommend an increase in
the minimum soil thickness beneath the absorption trenches from 0.7 to 0.8 metres.
-2-
tiretMtIVISOMINISMINZBIZISBMISICOVIVIIIIIMIMIIIIIHNIMIIIIIVIZIMINIINSISSMISSM
\
wwwwr
SUBJECT PROPERTY
District of
Pitt Meadows
---
ilk^
Silver
Valleyw
j .
i
25274 BOSONWORTH AVENUE
��Illis,
o
N
1N
n;;ARrf��ki
.1 # #
_
Prt
CORPORATION OF
firiy
tI
`'��,
,
i7..
THE DISTRICT OF
N
*ll
MAPLE RIDGE
MAPLE RIDGE
, �1� Albion
,
District of T (���
i
I
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Langley aa","
MIL
SCALE 1:5,000
ill
ell
DATE: Aug 9, 2007 FILE: RZ/102/03 BY: PC
River — --
4?god\l, c
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6499-2007.
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "B" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open
meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan
Amendment Bylaw No. 6499-2007."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
The North East Quarter, Section 11, Township 12, Except: Firstly part subdivided by Plan
23771; Secondly: Parcel A (Statutory Right -of -Way Plan LMP 1489); New Westminster
District
and as shown on Map No. 731, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this
Bylaw, the area outlined in heavy black line is hereby redesignated to Suburban Residential
and the area shown hatched is hereby redesignated to Conservation.
3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 2007.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 2007.
READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 2007.
READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 .
MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
Ppm. N
9.190
St 1047
BOSONWORTH AVE.
77 10870
1910 19.
P 350.
•1
1.1.
Rem 25
00199•6019
5
1212 1,49
P 1363
10
108
9
3.925 ho.
P 23771
1.944 90.
Rem N E 1 /4
63.001 ha.
11111 1400
NE. A
P 85110
P 8173
2713
P 2713
17
Pa.
1A.
MAPLE R
DG
0
AL COvv
Bylaw No. 6499-2007
Map No. 731
From: Forest and, Suburban Residential
To:
Suburban Residential
and Conservation (shown hatched)
Y AV
\DAC
MAPLE RIDGE
British Columbia
1:6000
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6500 - 2007
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6500 - 2007."
2. That the following amendment be made to Section 610, RG -2 Suburban Residential
Strata Zone, B. Regulations for Permitted Uses, by deleting item #1 and inserting the
following:
1. The permitted density of residential use in this zone shall not exceed 2.5
dwelling units per net hectare except where expressly permitted.
a) That area being 29.1 hectares, delineated in heavy black line on the
sketch plan annexed hereto and forming part of this Bylaw, may
despite any regulation to the contrary be used to a density up to but
not exceeding 3.64 dwelling units per net hectare.
3. That item #2 be deleted from Section 610, RG -2 Suburban Residential Strata Zone,
B. Regulations for Permitted Uses and that the subsequent item be renumbered
accordingly.
4. That those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot: 9, Section: 11, Township: 12, New Westminster District, Plan: 1363; and
The North East Quarter, Section: 11, Township 12, Except: Firstly part subdivided by
Plan 23771; Secondly: Parcel A (Statutory Right -of -Way Plan LMP 1489); New
Westminster District
And as shown on Map 1404, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of
this Bylaw, the area outlined in heavy black line is hereby rezoned to RG -2 Suburban
Residential Strata Zone and the area shown hatched is hereby rezoned to P-1 (park
and School) Zone.
5. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 2007.
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 2007.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 .
MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
441.
541- 1.1
DOSON
len
0 30166
37
1311 amo.
W RT -I AVE.
P 33046
P 33601
6.621 35
.141. 444.
z
11 1363
P 1363
10
9
3.925 ha.
P 23771
1.744 Pa
1 08
VE.
Rem N E 1 /4
1.14414
141444
P 3713
141141 116.
3713
3713
17
MAN
P 2713
32
VADL_ R
DG
ZO\
v - DI \G
Bylaw No. 6500-2007
Map No. 1404
From: A-2(Upland Agricultural)
To:
RG-2(Suburban Residential Strata)
and P-1(Park and School) shown hatched
MAPLE RIDGE
.7-Etritish CoLumtga:
1:6000
ROADSIDE STANDARD
of
WI
6
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PIAN
R
9
05
< a� v
z m
0 ¢
zcaLO
0
z
Lu
FT_
0
TYPICAL PLAN FOR
(1)
0
uJ
0_
z
tzr
SCALE 1-500
A 5
a)
0
U
0
LU
z
0
w
0
0
Cr
0
w
0
0
0
cc
W
0
0
0
w
0
0
ccU
a <
r c>
2-1
01
w
0
1
a
z
0
z'
Q
Ln
0
CC
CC
0:
0
0
w
0)
0
0
0
0
J N
0
Qi
Vi
MOb
TRATION SWALE
z
w
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
J
0
0
0
Z
0
J �
0 W
aQ
0
Q J
Z C
a W
C
O
O J
F <
Z
O
Z 1
W
O F-
N
LL
Q Z
0
8
5,
a)
0
o�
5
a)
z
0
Z
71.LLJ
Z0
Ce
>V
z
uJ
0
cc
9
o
ON -LOT INFILTRATION -DETENTION
FACILITY - TYPICAL SECTION
6
F
7
• 5
w
ai
C3)
1:1
a>
0
8
9)
8
a)
0
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: July 23, 2007
and Members of Council FILE NO: VP/045/07
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: CoW
SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit
22589 121 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant proposes to vary two sections in the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development
Servicing Bylaw No. 4800-1993 that require certain improvements as a condition of obtaining a
building permit. The two proposed variances are as follows:
1) To waive the requirement in Section IV, General Requirements, B. Highways, (2), "Schedule A
- Services and Utilities" to provide concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, boulevard treatment
and street tree planting.
2) To waive the requirement in Section IV, General Requirements, B. Highways, (3) to upgrade
streets fronting a site with an Institutional use to a Collector street standard.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/045/07 respecting property
located at 22589 121 Avenue.
2. That the following condition be met prior to authorization of the Variance Permit.
i) A Statutory Right Of Way plan and Agreement must be registered at the Land Title
Office.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context
Applicant:
Owner:
Toews Warner Bissky Architecture
Roman Catholic Archbishop Of Vancouver
Legal Description: Lot: 24, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 1161
OCP:
Existing: Institutional
1105
Zoning:
Existing:
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Use:
Zone:
Designation
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Use:
Zone:
Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Site Area:
Lot Size:
Requested Variance:
b) Variance Description:
P-2 (Special Institutional), P-4 (Church Institutional)
Eric Langton Elementary School / Ridge Meadows
College
P-1 (Park and School)
Institutional
Single Family Residential
RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Urban Residential
Vacant
RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Urban Residential
Single Family and Multi -Family Residential
RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) and
RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
Urban Residential
Church, School
Church, Expanded School
1.91 ha (4.72 acres)
1.91 ha (4.72 acres)
Road requirements, off-site servicing improvements
The subject property is located in the Maple Ridge Regional Town Centre and abuts three roads:
Edge Street to the west, 121 Avenue to the south and 227th Street to the east. The applicant
proposes to construct a one -storey building on the subject property. Section 938 of the Local
Government Act, specifies that a building permit application can trigger improvements on the
portion of a highway immediately adjacent to a site under application. 227 Street is currently built
to collector street standard, however, Edge Street and 121 Avenue do not meet the road and
servicing improvement standards outlined in the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No.
8420-1993.
Therefore, the applicant has applied to vary two sections of the Bylaw to waive the requirement to
upgrade the surrounding highway infrastructure to meet the Bylaw standards:
Section IV (General Requirements) B (Highways):
2. Any dedicated but undeveloped highway within or immediately adjacent to a proposed
subdivision or development shall be improved by the applicant in accordance with Schedule A.
- 2 -
3. Where lands are being improved for Commercial, Industrial, Institutional or Multi -Residential
use the street or streets fronting the development site must be constructed to collector street
standards as set out in the standard drawing and specifications of the District of Maple Ridge.
The standard width of a collector road is 11.6m. from curb to curb, incorporating two travel lanes
and a parking lane on each side. In total, a collector road has a 20m. right-of-way to incorporate
amenities such as sidewalks, boulevards, and street trees.
The existing road on Edge St is approx. 7.2m. wide which allows for two way traffic but there are no
parking lanes as there would normally be on a collector road. There is also a narrow sidewalk on the
eastern side of the road.
The constructed road on 121 Avenue varies in width but is mostly about 4.0m. wide. It currently
provides for one-way (eastbound) traffic only. This one way traffic arrangement has been in place
for many years and according to our traffic section in the Engineering Department it operates
acceptably. Both road allowances are 10m. wide and the constructed roads are in both cases built
to the property lines of the school leaving no room for widening.
Planning Analysis
The existing sidewalk on the east side of Edge Street was constructed partially on the church/school
property. Since this is an important path for public access to the properties north of St. Patrick's and
to ensure the Municipality has a continued ability to maintain the sidewalk, a statutory right-of-way over
that portion of the property will be required.
c) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department
The Building Permit application for a new classroom building for St. Patrick's School at the above
address has been reviewed by the Engineering Department. The Subdivision and Development
Servicing Bylaw 4800-1993 requires that the standard of the roads adjacent to a proposed building
development be improved by the owner to the standard in the bylaw. The narrow width of the road
carriageway, the lack of concrete curb and gutter and sidewalks and absence of street trees on both
121 Avenue and Edge Street are deficiencies according to the requirements of the bylaw. However,
since none of these works can be constructed within the space allowed by the existing narrow road
allowance, the Engineering Department is prepared to support a Development Variance Permit to waive
the off-site servicing improvements.
- 3 -
CONCLUSION:
Given that the proposed new building on this lot will not significantly change the current traffic flow in
this area and with the Engineering Department's support, it is recommended that VP/045/07 be given
favorable consideration.
Prepared by: Jen
Pla 'a Tdchnician
Approved. by: J a en , P, MCIP
Dir of Planning
Approved bye/ Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
1
Concurreipe: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
JC/dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A: Subject Property Map
Appendix B: Site Plan
-4-
P 80477
PARK
co 12237
Appel) X A
V
a
238
2227
237
221
236
256
P 42134
255 m 254 0
253
252
122 AVE.
122 AVE.
RP 84324
235
234
233 232
P42124
231
230
229
228
227
226
12239
Rem.
225
P 7219
Rem. A
12219
LMP 21095
PARK
305
P 46852
12155
12129
E 1/2 11
P 7875
Pi
7
875
8
9
10
BROWN AVE.
RP 79869
M
M ro
01
m v
12003
/09
m
CO
00
2138
Pcl. A
RP 56793
4
22
v
3
0
a
2
12195
2187
12177
12187
5
SUBJECT PROPERTY r23392
r
12157
24
P 1161
7
P 23392 12141
21 AVE.
12080
00 22552/54
22566
N
22576
0
A 22582
(J N
m
290
10
,._
'3
"1
1'12
(v3
N
N
N
N
m
287
288
289
a
P
9446
P 43724
291
12087
22567 O
co
J
22577
.D
r
P
843
P 9446
P 43724
292
9
8
5
4
6
5
4
296
295
294
a
12077
12060
/62
m Rem
N
N
N
r
N
n 293 /
BROWN AVE
0
CO
4
12038
5
P
6
4081
LOT A
(P9687)
'LMP1821q
5 N
7 ;.:1 8
P
446
9
RP 84340
297
298
P 43"
299
24
300
12047
301
12018
303
P 44882
*PP094
LMP 19460
A
DEWDN EY TRUNK ROAD
P 9687
2
P
9446
11
01
9-
r1 1
a
2
J N
District of
Pitt Meadows
P2
546
2
J
Sitver Valley
2
12244 P 14 .96 12243
P 289 9
131 130
12230 12231
1
12214
0)
197
o, 1222
2
2208
a
cn 198
0.. 12203
66
12192 N
265
12193
m
65 a
12178
a
a 264
12185
N 1/2A
12166/68
,rt 13
a 12179
P 7948
S 1/2A
12154
P 66473
355
12153
2
12142 0
354
12147
1
12136
2
12130 P 9944
v
0 353
a 12139
P 38897
175
12120
12131
N1/2 16
S1/2 16
a 12119
12090
BCS 1124
147
N 12111
(D
014 148
a 12101
P 22808
B
12082
Rem 10
P 11644
12087
12074
N 1/2
1112081
12068
h
04
2 co
a
S 1/2
.�, 1112071
N70'2
12060
N 1/2
a 1212087
Rem. 2
12048
1.0
n
a
S 1/2
12 12057
307
(0 12049
0)
a
P 7450
30612041
P 12253
3 12031
310
P 51311
L
DEWDN
22589 121 AVENUE
SCALE 1:2,500
District of
Langley
Rive
MAPLE RIDGE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Jun 14, 2007 FILE: VP/045/07 BY: PC
3
0
0
1 0•
.01 0.
0 9
0 0 "
0 O 0 0
E
if iiit
a� til f
$ " r
a c
0
0
01
s I
3 3 RIY : S u
7.1
G
213/2
D D D D D
1.> D
V m (21 A W N
f• Fr- T N
0 0 m o* a D
m f ^ N N
< o w
d a
0
0
u, o
o
Ut
bpi �
s n
0
3
0
V /
CD
E
07
0
22,11-1 511113i
0
it
itti...1
3
`& j$
Wayne Stephen Bissky
Site PI
Showing Existing Landscape
Proposed New aasstow„ Building
St. Pamck's Scholl
22589 -121st Avenue
MapleRide.ecV2x3TS
3
2
Wau.e .ban ...Ca Inc
R 21412 _
w .om
,,.v.6=„_
!�Q
72
MAPLE RIDGE
I
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE: August 10, 2007
FILE NO:
ATTN: C of W
Award of Contract 0-2007-51- Watermain Crossings
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The District is committed to providing reliable and sustainable infrastructure to its citizens. Part of
that commitment includes the replacement of aging and deteriorating watermains. Contract 0-2007-
51 includes the replacement of a watermain that services the Ridge Meadows Hospital. This report
recommends award of Contact 0-2007-51. The industry wide escalating construction costs also
require that the project funding be augmented from the Water Utility Reserve
RECOMMENDATION:
That contract 0-2007-51- Watermain Crossing be awarded to Kamloops Augering and Boring Ltd and
that the Mayor and Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal the contract;
That the funding requirements for Contract 0-2007-51 identified in this report be approved.
DISCUSSION:
Background Context:
The capital water projects that form Contract 0-2007-51 are designed to rehabilitate and upgrade
the existing water distribution system. Long term capital project # 8119 is the replacement of one of
three water supplies to Maple Ridge Hospital. During the installation of a new water meter in 2004
at this location it was observed that the 150 mm water main under Lougheed Highway was leaking
through pinholes due to corrosion, the carrier pipe which is corrugated steel was also badly
deteriorated. This observation initiated the project.
Long term capital project # 8118 is one part of a fire flow grid improvement plan to create a
dependable backbone to our water distribution system. The portion to the south on Laity Street was
completed in 2005. The remaining section on Laity Street between Lougheed and Dewdney Trunk is
presently in the longterm capital plan scheduled for 2010, LTC # 3025.
A copy of Paragon Engineering's, the District's engineering consultant, outlining the tender results is
attached.
Financial Implications:
The project costs were estimated using the actual costs for similar works completed recently
throughout the lower mainland. An allowance for inflation was also included. However the lowest
contract tender exceeds the allocated funding by $60,000. The major difference is due to the active
.../page 2
1106
construction market and the resulting escalated bids. It is recommended that the allocated funding
be augmented by Water Utility Reserve funds. The use of water reserve funds will not impact the
annual water rates.
Estimated Expenditures:
Contract $ 142,559.40
Engineering $ 20,000.00
Contingencies $ 17,440.00
Total: $ 180,000.00
Proposed Funding:
LTC # 8118 $ 60,000.00
LTC # 8119 $ 60,000.00
Water Utility Reserve $ 60,000.00
Total: $ 180,000.00
Desired Outcome:
The project is consistent with the Districts on-going commitment to infrastructure replacement and
renewal. The project reduces water loss, improved water quality, and provides reliable, improved fire
flow.
Citizen/Customer Implications:
The project provides improved customer service through ongoing maintenance and rehabilitation of
the water distribution system.
Alternatives:
One alternative is to collapse the tenders and bring the projects back as part of next year's Business
Plan. This is not recommended as costs are anticipated to continue to increase.
CONCLUSIONS:
The work included in Contract 0-2007-51 provides reliable water service to the Ridge Meadows
Hospital and the surrounding area. It is recommended that the contract be awarded to the low
tender. It is also recommended that additional funding be approved from the water Utility Reserve to
complete toject.
r
Prepared by: Ed Mitchell, AScT
uperi tendent of Waterworks
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrency J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
EM.sr
Attach.
PRriRGOrl ENGINEERING LTD.
consulting engineers
August 9, 2007
FILE NO: 2007-51
Mr. Bernie Serne, AScT
District of Maple Ridge
23925 Dewdney Trunk Road
Maple Ridge, BC V4R 1W1
Dear Bernie:
RE: CONTRACT 0-2007-51 - WATERMAIN CROSSINGS - LOUGHEED HIGHWAY AT
LAITY STREET and RIDGE MEADOWS HOSPITAL 240 M East
Tenders for the above referenced project were received at the offices of the District of Maple
Ridge at 2:00 p.m., August 8, 2007.
Three Tenders were received as follows:
TENDERER
CONTRACT
ITEMS
GST
6%
TOTAL
TENDER
Kamloops Augering & Boring Ltd.
$134,490.00
$8,069.40
$142,559.40
Directional Mining & Drilling Ltd.
$198,460.00
$11,907.60
$210,367.60
Pacific Underground Installations
(1990) Ltd.
$230,000.00
$13,800.00
$243,800.00
The Engineer's estimate for the above work was $97,900.00 plus $5,874.00 GST for a Total
of $103,774.00
Items to note are as follows:
1. Prices received from the all three Tenderer exceeded the Engineer's Estimate (137% to
235%). The Engineer's Estimate was based on average prices received for recent
tendered projects in the Lower Mainland over the past few years. The Engineer's
Estimate was $36,590.00 (37%) below the low Tenderer's Price. The major difference
between the Engineer's Estimate and the Low Tenderer was due to overall lower unit
prices.
2. The tender submitted by the low bidder, Kamloops Augering & Boring Ltd. did not
contain Errors, Omissions, or Inconsistencies.
3. We have discussed the low Tender with Malcolm Bachand of Kamloops Augering &
Boring Ltd. and have established that based on their approach to the project, the
Tender submitted by Kamloops Augering & Boring Ltd. is representative of their
interpretation of works to be done.
4. Malcolm Bachand has also confirmed that Kamloops Augering & Boring Ltd. is
prepared to enter into a Contract with the District of Maple Ridge at the Tender price, as
submitted. We are familiar with Pacific Underground Installations (1990) Ltd.'s
capability and conclude (based on the submission with their tender) that they have the
competence, qualifications and relevant experience required to do the work.
5. The tender submitted by the other two Tenderers did not contain any Errors,
Omissions, or Inconsistencies.
PARAGON ENGINEERING LTD.
104 —1515 Broadway Street
Port Coquitlam, B. C. V3C 6M2
www.paragonenqineering.com
tel: (604) 944-0820
fax: (604) 944-0815
page no. 2
August 9, 2007
Mr. Bernie Serne, AScT
Based on the information provided in the Tender documents, the attached, and the above,
we recommend that the contract be awarded to the low Tenderer, Kamloops Augering &
Boring Ltd. at their Tender price of One Hundred Forty -Two Thousand, Five Hundred Fifty -
Nine Dollars and Forty Cents ($134,490.00 plus $8,069.40 GST or $142,559.40).
We trust that the above and attached is sufficient to allow the District of Maple Ridge an
opportunity to assess available options for award of contract.
Yours truly,
PARAGON ENGINEERING LTD.
JOHN KUPSKAY, P. Eng.
Project Manager
attachment: Comparison of Tenders
Tabulation of Tenders
PRRRRGOf
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: July 16, 2007
and Members of Council FILE NO: EO8-015-862.2
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer EO1-052-001
ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 123/07
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A developer has subdivided land at Mclvor Avenue and 202 Street. Part of the subdivision servicing
is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local Government Act. The
extended servicing benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC 123/07 provides the
municipality's assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or extended servicing to the
benefiting lands.
RECOMMENDATION:
That with respect to the subdivision of lands involved in subdivision SD 75/05 located at Mclvor
Avenue and 202 Street, be it resolved:
1. That the cost to provide the excess or extended services are, in whole or in part, excessive
to the municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall be paid by the owners
of the land being subdivided, and
2. That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or extended services on the parcels
and in the amounts as set out in the staff report dated July 16, 2007; and further
3. That the Mayor and Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and se& Excess Capacity
Latecomer Agreement LC 123/07 with the subdivider of the said lands.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The attached map identifies the lands which are involved in the subdivision and those which will
benefit from the excess or extended services. The cost breakdown for each excess or extended
service is shown on attached Schedule A.
1107
In addition, a copy of Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 123/07 is also attached for
information purposes.
b) Strategic Alignment:
Administration of excess or extended services legislation complies with the Smart Managed Growth
element of the Corporate Strategic Plan. The administration procedure supports the requirement for
a developer to construct municipal infrastructure in support of land development and recognizes
that the infrastructure may provide benefit to other land.
c) Policy Implications:
Part 26, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all or part of
the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality shall determine the proportion of the cost
of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and determine the proportion of the cost
of the service to be attributed to parcels of land which the municipality considers will benefit from
the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 123/07 will provide such determination for Subdivision SD
75/05.
CONCLUSION:
A developer has provided certain services in support of Subdivision SD 75/05. Some of the services
benefit adjacent lands therefore, it is appropriate to impose Latecomer Charges on the benefitting
lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 123/07 summarizes the municipality's determination of
benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the term over which such Latecomer
Charges will be applied.
Prepared by. Terry Fryer, ng.
ana_er/oCorporate & Development Engineering
Reviewed by: Andrew Wood, PhD., PEng.
Municipal Engineer
Approveby: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
Ij I/bc
Schedule A
TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE
1. ONSITE SERVICE FOR ADJACENT PROPER -TY
SERVICE
# BENEFITTING
LOTS
COST OF COSTPER
BENEFIT LOT
BENEFIT
ATTRIBUTED
BY PROPERTY
EXCLUDING
SUBDIVISION
Road
Sanitary Sewer
Main
Sanitary Service
Storm Sewer Man
Storm Service
Water Main
Water Service
Road
Sanitary Sewer
Storm Sewer
Water Main
4
4
2
4
2
4
2
9
9
9
9
2. EXTENDED N0MINAL SERVICE
SERVICE
# BENEFITTING
LOTS
$17,944.00
$6,000.00
$1,800.00
$8,000.00
$2,000.00
$8,600.00
$3,000.00
$41,202.00
$14'SO0.00
$16,902.00
$17,199.00
$4,486.00
$1,500.00
$900.00
$2,000.00
$1,000.00
$2,150.00
$1,500.00
$4,578.00
$1,656.00
$1,878.00
$1,911.00
COST OF COSTPER
BENEFIT LOT
Lot 102, Plan 50054
3 x $4,486.00
Lot 102, Plan 50054
3x$1.500.00
Lot 102, Plan 50054
2 x $900.00
Lot 102, Plan 50054
3 x $2,000.00
Lot 102, Plan 50054
2x$1,000.00
Lot 102, Plan 50054
3 x $2,150.00
Lot 102.Plan 50054
2x$1.500.00
Lot Rem 1, Plan 21483
1 x $4,578.00
Lot Rem 1, Plan 21483
1x$1.650.00
Lot Rem 1,Plan 21483
1 x $1,878.00
Lot Rem 1'Plan 21483
1x$1.911.00
BENEFIT
ATTRIBUTED
BY PROPERTY
EXCLUDING
SUBDIVISION
Water Service
Mclvor Avenue
Storm Sewer
Mclvor Avenue
2
2
$4,000.00 $2.300.0O
$3,950.00 G1.975.00
Page 1
Lot 102, Plan 50054
1 x $2,300.00
Lot Rem 1,Plan 21483
1 x $2,300.00
Lot 102, Plan 50054
1x$1.075DO
Lot Rem 1, Plan 21483
1x$1,975.00
SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF COST PER BENEFIT
LOTS BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED
BY PROPERTY
EXCLUDING
SUBDIVISION
Sanitary Sewer
Mclvor Avenue
2
$6,300.00 $3,150.00 Lot 102, Plan 50054
1 x $3,150.00
Lot Rem 1, Plan 21483
1 x $3,150.00
A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows:
Lot 102, DL 263, Plan 50054, NWD
Lot Rem 1, DL 263, Plan 21483, NWD
Page 2
$44,633.00
$17,448.00
Rem. 101
SUBDIVISION
Pcl. A
P
c\J
a_ 7
r\
N)
r)
Pcl. A
0
0
co
BCP 24879
1 MP 49634
P 21483
Rem. 2
•EfE714E:f1.111SG....13.67tAtY.
P 13328
Rem 2
2.655 ha
a_
6
12461
5
N•)
co
103
12451
McIVOR AVE.
32
12437
Lfl
r%) 31
o 12425
°- 30
12421
29
12411
28
12399
27
in 12389
Cr,
26
c\I 12383
25
12375
CV
0
0.809 ha.
5 ;•,.) kMP 42683
B A
c\r
"-)
rrz,
L
20205
8
33 p) 0
12440
34 0-
12426/28
35
12422
36
12402
37
12400
38
12392 L()
0)
)
39
12382 c\I
40 (4.)
555
42
43
P 16960
Rem E
0.607 ha.
2
876
2
3 R4
2
S'S7 h
SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY 1 BENEFITTING PROPERTIES
EXCESS CAPACITY/EXTENDED
SERVICES AGREEMENT
LC 123/07 SD 75/05
CORPORATION OF THE
711111/1" DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
MAPLE RIDGE
Incorporated 12 September, 1874
ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT
FILE/DWG No LC 123-2007
DATE: JUNE 2007
N
SCALE:
N.T.S.
EXCESS CAPACITY LATECOMER AGREEMENT
LC 123/07 - SD 75/05
THIS AGREEMENT made the day of , 2007:
BETWEEN:
S.N. 2 Development Corporation
116-998 Harbourside Drive
North Vancouver, BC V7P 3T2
(Hereinafter called the "Subdivider")
AND:
OF THE FIRST PART
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under
the "Local Government Act", having its offices at 11995 Haney Place, in the
Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia
(Hereinafter called the "Municipality")
WHEREAS:
OF THE SECOND PART
A. The Subdivider has subdivided certain lands and premises located within the
Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more
particularly known and described as:
Lot 2, DL 263, Plan 21483 and Lot 101, DL 263, Plan 50054
(Hereinafter called the "said lands")
B. In order to facilitate the approval of the subdivision of the said lands, the Subdivider
is required to construct and install the road and sanitary sewer and storm sewer and
water services shown on the design prepared by Citiwest Consulting Ltd., Job No.
05-2161 (Sheets 1 to 40), dated July 2006, reviewed January 2, 2006. Project No.
E08-015-862.2.
(Hereinafter called the "Extended Services");
C. The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands
and other than the said lands;
D. The Municipality considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive;
E. The Subdivider has provided the Extended Services in the Amount of $152.397.00.
Page 1
F. The Municipality has determined that the following properties:
Lot 102, DL 263, Plan 50054 NWD
Lot Rem 1, DL 263, Plan 21483, NWD
(the "Benefitting Lands") will benefit from the Extended Services;
G. The Municipality has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands
connecting to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the "Latecomer Charge") on
the Benefitting Lands in the following amounts:
Lot 102, DL 263, Plan 50054, NWD
• $4,486.00 per lot, to a maximum of $13,458.00, for access to the road on
201 Street.
• $1,500.00 per lot, to a maximum of $4,500.00, for use of the sanitary sewer
main on 201 Street.
• $900.00 per lot, to a maximum of $1,800.00, for use of the sanitary sewer
service connections on 201 Street.
• $2,000.00 per lot, to a maximum of $6,000.00, for use of the storm sewer
main on 201 Street.
• $1,000.00 per lot, to a maximum of $2,000.00, for use of the storm sewer
service connections on 201 Street.
• $2,150.00 per lot, to a maximum of $6,450.00, for use of the water main on
201 Street.
• $1,500.00 per lot, to a maximum of $3,000.00, for use of the water service
connections on 201 Street.
• $2,300.00 for use of the 38mm water service connection on Mclvor Avenue.
• $1,975.00 for use of the storm sewer service connection on Mclvor Avenue.
• $3,150.00 for use of the sanitary sewer service connection on Mclvor
Avenue.
Lot Rem 1, DL 263, Plan 21483, NWD
• $4,578.00 for access to the road on Allison Street without extension of the
road.
• $1,656.00 for use of the sanitary sewer system on Allison Street without
extension of the sewer main.
• $1,878.00 for use of the storm sewer system on Allison Street without
extension of the sewer main.
• $1,911.00 for use of the water system on Allison Street without extension of
the water main.
• $2,300.00 for use of the 38mm water service connection on Mclvor Avenue.
• $1,975.00 for use of the storm sewer service connection on Mclvor Avenue.
• $3,150.00 for use of the sanitary sewer service connection on Mclvor
Avenue.
plus interest calculated annually from the date of completion of the Extended
Services as certified by the General Manager - Public Works and Development
Page 2
Services of the Municipality (the "Completion Date") to the date of connection by the
Benefitting Lands to the Extended Services;
H. The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and
collected by the Municipality shall pursuant to Section 939 (7) of the Municipal Act
R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 be paid to the Subdivider as provided for in this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 939 (9) of the Local Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996,
c. 323, The parties hereto agree as follows:
1. The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by
the Municipality within ten (10) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to the Subdivider
and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of June 30th and December 31st of
the year in which the Latecomer Charge is collected by the Municipality.
2. This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any
purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer Charge by the Municipality to the
Subdivider, or ten (10) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the Municipality shall
be forever fully released and wholly discharged from any and all liability and obligations
herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer Charge, and whether arising before
or after the expiry of this Agreement.
3. The Subdivider represents and warrants to the Municipality that the Subdivider has
not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from the
owner of the Benefitting Lands for the provision, or expectation of the provision of the
Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein; and further
represents and warrants that he has not entered into any agreement with the owner of the
Benefitting Lands for consideration in any way related to or connected directly or indirectly
with the provision of the Extended Services. The representations and warranties of the
Subdivider herein shall, notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Agreement, survive the expiry of
this Agreement.
4. The Subdivider (if more than one corporate body or person) hereby agrees that the
Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in equal
shares.
5. If the Subdivider is a sole corporate body or person, the Municipality shall remit the
Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the following
(name and address of director of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.):
Page 3
6. In the event that the Subdivider is not the owner of the said lands, the owner shall
hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto the Subdivider, his heirs and assigns, all
rights, title and interest under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective Corporate Seals,
attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf, the day, and
year first above written.
The Corporate Seal of S.H. 2 Development
Corporation was affixed in the presence
of:
authorized Signatory - Subdivider
authorized Signatory - Subdivider
The Corporate Seal of the CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE was hereunto
affixed in the presence of:
Mayor - Authorized Signatory
Corporate Officer - Authorized Signatory
Page 4
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 7, 2007
and Members of Council FILE NO: EO1-035-001
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Terry Fox Run
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The committee for the Terry Fox Foundation is requesting permission to use municipal streets for the
Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Terry Fox Run on Sunday, September 16, 2007. A map showing the run
routes is attached.
Authorization from Council is required in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By-
law 3136-1982" to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Terry Fox Run on
Sunday, September 16, 2007, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule 'A' attached to the staff
report dated August 7, 2007 are met.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for
organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually
given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability for injury or
damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as
Schedule 'A.'
The Terry Fox Run will start and finish at Hammond Stadium. The run starts at 10:00 AM and
will consist of three venues: a 1 Km, 5 Km and a 10 Km run. A map showing the routes is
attached to Form 'A' along with the letter of request. Participants will be utilizing the road
shoulders or sidewalks; and as such there will be no road closures.
b) Strategic Plan:
Permitting of Maple Ridge street events promotes community development and often
highlights Maple Ridge's natural and built features.
1108
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets may cause some delays and inconveniences to other
road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the event organizers.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP
for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as
Coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service).
e) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal
streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff
processing effort.
f) Policy Implications:
Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices.
g) Alternatives:
The District could refuse to permit the run to occur. In this event, the organizer would have
to cancel the event.
CONCLUSIONS:
From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events
and activities. The Terry Fox Run was held in Maple Ridge last year without incident.
Submitted by: +r -fro••, PhD., PEng.
cipal Engineer
Approve. •y: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
AW/ml
Schedule 'A' To Council Memorandum Dated August 7, 2007
Terry Fox Run
Condition of Approval
Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers:
1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the
R.C.M.P., and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District);
2. notify local Fire Department, and Ambulance Services of the event;
3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses;
4. obtain any required permits from the District of Maple Ridge Parks and Leisure Services
Department for park facility use;
5. make arrangements with the City of Pitt Meadows for use of their roads;
6. make arrangements for all surrounding businesses and residents for access purposes
during the event;
7. notify the Golden Crossing Constructors Joint Venture (Theresa Fernandez, 604-377-9237)
of the event and ensure traffic control is provided and adequate safety precautions are
taken;
8. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of
the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date);
9. must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times.
10. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out
of or in any way connected with the event;
11. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability
insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have
the following statement written in the policy:
"Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy
shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in
writing to the District."
Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy
shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the
Corporate Officer prior to the event; and
12. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which
existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of
the District.
The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw permission to use
municipal streets for this and future events should the organizers fail to comply with the above
requirements.
Chief Administrative Officer
The Terry Fox Run For Cancer Research
Engineerin g Dept.
District of Maple Ridge,
11955 Haney Place,
Maple Ridge. B C
July 20`h. 2007
The Maple Ridge -Pitt Meadows Terry Fox Run will be held on Sunday ,
September 16t. 2007 . The Run starts at 10.00 a.m. and the route starts and
finishes at Hammond Community Centre as in previous years.
I am enclosing RCMP approval of the route, the Certificate of Insurance and
a map of the route and we look forward to receiving approval from Council.
Sincerely,
Betty Levens
#122 22611 116t. Ave.,
Maple Ridge, B C V2X OW7
terryfoxrun.org
FORM `A'
Details of the Event Date:: 31J I -Y 1 D:7 a 00 7
Contact Person: ET -r! LE \IE r S Phone 4 67- rj 3 7 Fax ti- 6 7- 93 g 7
Details: The.,. y /-13X- 1R u r k) i ii 6e, /Ida . cryi cryS On LI
S e..p'te.in 1 e. r Ib'� &o 0 7.
r he, R) n starts ail d_ ni C+om MAA ►'l i f y
tt-a1 and s-rtal,m.
T fLQ , Run s1-o.rtf. at 10.0 a •m
i ►
[-i-d-u 1(�s R v �� ren r 9 Ctuli i It be ,,se 't-i_n9 u p 't t.C v is-Q_�. of
moni+c)f ►nQ ir.
►Z C P 1ictrie.$ 0.(Swyrk nrto&t irti ` .., os.
Sketch of Traffic Control Plan:
S e.e 011--c..c. .d. mk,p
RCMP concurrence for the proposed Traffic Control Plan
The following agencies have been advised and acknowledge the event:
BC Transit
Fire Department
Ambulance Services
Other
/77A2/7P
11
TERRY FOX RUN
Client Focused Risk Solutions
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE (A)
THIS CERTIFICATE CONSTfTUTES A STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AS OF THE DATE OF ISSUANCE AND ARE SO REPRESENTED AND WARRANTED ONLY TO THE
CERTIFICATE HOLDER; OTHER PERSONS RELYING ON THIS MEMORANDUM DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF
INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE
COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES LISTED BELOW.
INSURED
The Terry Fox Foundation
46165 Yale Road, Suite 303
Chilliwack, B.C.
V2P 2F'2
Re: Evidence of Insurance - Terry Fox Run
CERTIFICATE HOLDER - Name and Address
District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge, BC
V2X 6A9
Insurance as described herein has been arranged on behalf of the insured named herein under the following policy(ies) and as more fully described by
the terms, conditions, exclusions and provisions contained in the said policylies) and any endorsements attached thereto.
COVERAGE
INSURER POLICY NO. EXPIRY DATE COMBINED BODILY INJURY &
PROPERTY DAMAGE
Commercial General Liability ING Insurance
Including: Cross Liability
Umbrella Liability ING Insurance
501095221 October 31, 2007 $5,000,000 each occurrence
501113605 October 31, 2007 $10,000,000 excess of
$5,000,000
Additional Insured and Cross Liability: It is hereby understood and agreed that the following are added as additional insureds but only with respect to
the above and arising out of the Named Insured's Operations. The policy limits are not increased by the addition of such Additional Insured and remain
as stated in this Certificate. Further, the policy shall apply to each Insured in the same manner and to the same extent as if a separate policy had been
issued to each.
The District of Maple Ridge
Cancellation: Should any of the above described policies be cancelled or materially changed before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company
will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days written notice to the above named certificate holder, but assumes no responsibility for failure to do so.
Broker: Purves Redmond Limited
390 Bay Street, Ste. 800
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y2
Authorized Representative: Date: June 5, 2007
PURVES REDMO}ID IMITED
PER
MAPLE RIDGE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 14, 2007
and Members of Council FILE NO:
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C.O.W.
Maple Ridge Bowling Green renovation loan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Maple Ridge Lawn Bowling Club recently started their project to replace the artificial surface on
the bowling green. The club's executive were successful in attracting competitive bids for the work
involved, and have entered into agreements for the civil work and the supply and installation of the
new synthetic surface. Most of the civil work has been completed and they are now waiting for the
delivery and installation of the new carpet which was shipped from Britain.
The carpet supplier recently visited the site, and has recommended that the Bowling Club Executive
consider adding an E -layer to the surface prior to laying the new carpet, and have indicated that
failing to do so may result in a high risk of accidental damage that would affect the level and
playability of the green. There is a fairly significant cost involved in doing this work, although the club
would still be on budget for the project. This additional work would use up the money they had
identified as a contingency fund. The club has requested that the Municipality consider extending
their loan in this regard by an additional $15,000 under the same terms and conditions as the
original loan, for use as a contingency fund (please see attached report for Terms and Conditions).
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That the Maple Ridge Lawn Bowling Club's request for an additional $15,000 to be added to the
original loan amount of $30,000, for use as a contingency fund for the bowling green carpet
replacement project be approved noting that it be subject to the same terms and conditions as the
original loan agreement.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The Maple Ridge Bowling Club borrowed money from the Municipality to help pay for the bowling
facility at the Thomas Haney site several years ago, and entered into a loan payment plan over a
10 year period. The loan was paid in full by the club as per the terms of the agreement, with the
final payment being received in 2006.
The bowling club has raised over $60,000 towards the replacement of the artificial bowling
surface, and has also been successful in obtaining other grants for an additional $90,000. The
club anticipated that the project would cost approximately $180,000, and had previously
requested a loan of $30,000 in order to fully fund the project.
1131
Where the club has been successful in obtaining competitive bids for this project, and was
actually under budget to this point, an unexpected additional cost has caused the executive
some concern. The additional costs will use all of the funds in their contingency fund, although
they still anticipate completion on budget. The club would like to ensure that they have taken
reasonable steps to ensure any other minor issues that arise can be taken care of effectively.
b) Desired Outcome:
Completion of the resurfacing project without delay, incorporating the additional recommended
materials to ensure a long lasting and durable playing surface.
c) Interdepartmental Implications:
Coordinate with Finance Department Staff.
d) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
Extend the loan Agreement from $30,000 to $45,000.
e) Alternatives:
Some components of this renovation project may have to be delayed, if funding is not available
for any unforeseen aspects of the project.
CONCLUSIONS:
The club has worked tirelessly to raise funds for this project through club activities, as well as making
applications for grants and other funding opportunities. The Lawn Bowling Club has demonstrated
through past agreements with the District that they are fully capable of meeting the terms and
conditions associated with this loan request.
Prepared
5
c�—
David Boag
Director, Parks and F
ilities
Approved by: ' Paul Gill
General Manager, Corporate & Finance
Concurrence: ' J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
DB
MAPT F RIDGE
CORPORATION OF THE
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: January 12, 2007
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C.O.W.
SUBJECT: MAPLE RIDGE LAWN BOWLING CLUB — LOAN REQUEST
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The District received the attached request in December, 2006.
The Club has the responsibility for replacing the artificial turf lawn bowling green and plan to do so this
year. The total budget for the project is $180,000. The Club has $150,000 of that total in place. $90,000 of
that funding (from the BC Gaming Branch) is conditional upon the project being started this spring.
Although the Club will continue with its fundraising efforts they need to have all of the required funding
in place in order to begin the work in March. They have asked for an interest free loan of $30,000 from
the District of Maple Ridge, noting that they have previously paid off a $75,000 loan from the District in
the amount of $7,500 per year. The Commission has reviewed and endorsed the following
recommendation:
RECOMMENDATION:
That a $30,000 interest free loan be considered for the Maple Ridge Lawn Bowling Club for the purpose
of installing new artificial turf for the lawn bowling green, noting that:
a. such loan shall only be advanced upon proof of expenditures for the turf being received by the District
along with an indication that no other fundraised support is available to the Club at the time of the
expenditure, and
b. the outstanding balance of the loan is to be paid off the earlier of:
i. $7,500 per annum payable on July 1st each year with the first payment due on July 1s`, 2008 or
ii. as funds raised specifically for the project from outside sources (such as service clubs) become
available.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The Lawn Bowling Facility was opened in 1996 and has been operated by the Lawn Bowling Club
since that time. The project was funded with several grants from groups like the Haney Rotary Club,
the Provincial Government, the Operating Engineers Training Program and others as well as
Municipal funding. The Lawn Bowling Club committed $75,000 to the project to be raised over time
and paid back to the Municipality. Although the loan was not initially provided on an interest free
basis a later decision by District Council provided that benefit. The loan was paid off by the Club a
few years ago.
Along with the initial construction contribution the Club accepted ongoing responsibility for Club
operations and maintenance as well as responsibility for replacing the artificial turf lawn bowling
surface when it became necessary to do so. The initial life expectancy of the turf was anticipated at 10
years which has now passed.
b) Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome is to replace the artificial turf lawn bowling green in order to maintain an
appropriate playing surface for the sport of lawn bowling in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows.
c) Strategic Alignment:
Maintaining facilities which encourage active living on the part of all our citizens (of all ages) is part
of maintaining a safe and livable community. The Lawn Bowling facility in particular provides an
opportunity for older residents and those who are physically challenged to continue to be active at a
level which is appropriate to their ability.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Participants will have the benefit of a newer surface which drains appropriately and doesn't limit play
to the degree that play is currently limited.
e) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
Council will need to consider where the additional funding can be provided for this purpose when the
project is considered at that level. Unfortunately the request was not received in time to be considered
in the current business planning cycle.
Initial discussions with Finance Department staff have suggested an adjustment to the District's
annual budget may be required at the point of final adoption of the amendment which is generally
made later in the year to reflect new information obtained between now and the time of setting the tax
rates. Since this request is for an interest free loan the impact and actual cost of responding positively
to the request is only the lost interest income on the amount advanced.
Since the Club has committed to continue its fund raising it will be important to include a requirement
in any resolution and loan agreement that the loan will be paid off as soon as possible as funds
become available to the Club.
f) Policy Implications:
A precedent has already been set with this approach having been utilized before for the initial
construction of the facility.
g) Alternatives:
The alternative would be to deny the request and require the Club to secure a bank loan with the
requirement for interest to be paid and personal guarantees provided by the membership.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Club has been functioning successfully for over ten years and has asked for a loan in order to meet its
obligations with respect to replacing the turf for the lawn bowling green. The Club has proven its ability
previously to pay off such a loan and, consequently staff are of the view that the request should be given
consideration.
Prepared bv:
Mike Murray
General Manager, Community Development
Parks & Recreation
Approved bv: Paul Gill
General Manager, Corporate and Finance
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
MM:ik
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 16, 2007
and Members of Council FILE NO: E02-010-108
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council
SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Road Improvements on 132 Avenue (Fern Crescent) from
232 Street to Balsam Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The District's approved 2007 Capital Budget includes funds for road improvements on 132 Avenue
(Fern Crescent) from 232 Street to Balsam Street. The construction work consists of road
reconstruction, storm drainage, concrete sidewalks, curb and gutters, streetlights, horse trail, ditch
enhancement, walkway and wooden foot bridge construction.
The project was tendered in July 2007. Although 10 contractors responded to the invitation to bid,
the District received only two tenders. Prices are within the approved Capital Plan and Council
approval is required to award the work.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Contract EO2-010-108, Road Improvements on 132 Avenue (Fern Crescent), be awarded to
Double M Excavating Ltd. in the amount of $650,659.14 and the Mayor and Corporate Officer be
authorized to execute both the contract and TransLink Contribution Agreement for the project.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The District's Capital Plan identifies as part of the Safer City Program, safety upgrades on
132 Avenue (Fern Crescent) between 232 Street and Balsam Street. The work to construct
urban standards will include widening the roadway to allow for two lanes of traffic, bike
lanes, concrete curb, sidewalks, street lighting, horse trail, ditch enhancement and
footbridge in Maple Ridge Park. This is the first phase of multi phase improvements. The
second phase of this project will be the upgrading of 232 Street from the 128 Avenue to 132
Avenue and traffic roundabout at the intersection of 232 Street and 132 Avenue. Future
phases (over the long term) will continue east, from Fern Crescent to the gates of Golden
Ears Park.
2007 Construction
The first open house was held February 8, 2007 for residents, community groups and the
public to view the project and different options of the road improvements were presented.
The final open house was held July 19, 2007 to present the final design that was tendered.
1201
The project was tendered July 11, 2007. Although 10 contractors responded to the invitation
to bid, only two contractors submitted bids, Double M Excavating Ltd. and Jack Cewe Ltd.
Their tender for the work was $650,569.14 and $1,030,200.00 respectively. The tenders
have been reviewed and staff recommend that Double M Excavating Ltd. be awarded the
contract for this project.
b) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
This project is funded by a 50 percent grant from TransLink. The 2007 Capital Budget
approved by Council, provides sufficient funds for the Contract under LTC 6080.
The TransLink agreement is attached and requires execution by the Mayor and Corporate
Officer.
c) Citizens/Customer Implications:
Construction will start as soon as the project is awarded and attempts will be made to
minimize the impact to the neighborhood during construction.
d) Strategic Alignment:
The District's Strategic Plan directs that the District maintain and enhance a multi-modial
transportation system within Maple Ridge to provide citizens with safe, efficient alternatives
for the movement of individuals and goods. The project, as part of the Safer City Program,
will meet these objectives.
e) Intergovernmental Relationships:
The project is funded in part under TransLink's Major Road Network funding and is an
example of inter -agency cooperation to improve the transportation network in Maple Ridge.
CONCLUSION:
Transportation safety and mobility improvements have been designed and tendered for 132 Avenue
from 232 Street to Balsam Street . The tender price of $650,569.14 by Double M Excavating Ltd. for
the road improvements on 132 Avenue is the lowest tender price. The District should enter into a
contract with Doke M Excavating Ltd. and Council approval to award the work is recommended.
�f!
�,(d-,prepared by ria Guerra, PEng.
Senicir Project Engineer
Reviewed by: A d 4v Wood, PhD., PEng.
"Munigi°pal F sneer
Financial Trey 6r Thompson, CGA
Concurrence: Manager, Financial Planning
Approved by: F/ank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
en- IVJanager: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence:
MG:mg
J.
Rule
Chi- Administrative Officer
2006 MRN Minor Capital Program Agreement No. 0622-1101
2006 MRN Minor Capital Program
AGREEMENT
Agreement No. 0622-1101
THIS AGREEMENT made the day of , 20
BETWEEN:
AND:
Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority, having an office at
1600 - 4720 Kingsway, Burnaby, BC, V5H 4N2
("TransLink") OF THE FIRST PART
District of Maple Ridge having an office at 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC,
V2X 6A9
(the "Municipality") OF THE SECOND PART
The parties hereby agree as follows:
1.0 Definitions
1.1 In this Agreement, the following terms will have the following meanings:
"Eligible Costs" will mean direct capital costs, properly and reasonably incurred and paid
solely and specifically in relation to the Project, as described in the Major Road Network
(MRN) Minor Capital Program Description and Guidelines issued by TransLink, as
amended from time to time. Such costs would usually be capitalised in the financial
records of the Municipality;
"Project" will mean design and construction on 132 Avenue from 232 Street to Fern
Crescent (-550m), as described in Schedule "A";
"Work" will mean everything to be provided and performed by the Municipality in
relation to the Project.
2.0 GVTA Act
2.1 The Municipality acknowledges that TransLink may, by bylaw, establish standards for all
or any part of the major road network, including the Project (once added to the MRN, if
Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 1 of 8
2006 MRN Minor Capital Program Agreement No. 0622-1101
not currently part of the network), in accordance with the Greater Vancouver
Transportation Authority Act (the "Act").
3.0 Project
3.1 The Municipality represents and warrants that:
3.1.1 it has the capacity and authority to enter into this Agreement;
3.1.2 this Agreement is valid and binding on the Municipality;
3.1.3 it has the skills and experience necessary to carry out the Project; and
3.1.4 it has developed and approved the Project requirements and budget set out in
Schedule "A" in a professional, competent and diligent manner.
3.2 The Municipality will undertake and complete the Project, at its expense:
3.2.1 in accordance with the requirements set out in Schedule "A" for the Project;
3.2.2 by December 31, 2007 or such later date as requested by the Municipality and
agreed to in writing by TransLink;
3.2.3 in a professional, competent, timely and diligent manner, in accordance with
acceptable industry standards; and
3.2.4 in compliance with all applicable laws, statutes, regulations, by-laws, and
directions of all governmental and statutory authorities issued under lawful
authority.
3.3 The Project will be considered complete when:
3.3.1 the Work is ready for use, or is being used, for its intended purpose; and
3.3.2 the total value of all incomplete, defective and deficient Work does not exceed
3% of the maximum Project budget set out in Schedule "A".
3.4 Any requests from the Municipality for a material change in the Project scope of work, or
an increase in the maximum Project budget, or an extension to the deadline for
completion stipulated in s. 3.2.2, must be submitted in writing to TransLink's Manager,
Roads and Bridges. No changes in the scope of work, maximum Project budget, or
deadline for completion will be effective unless and until approved in writing by
TransLink, in its sole and absolute discretion.
3.5 The Municipality confirms that:
3.5.1 the Municipality has developed and approved the Project requirements and budget
set out in Schedule "A";
Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 2 of 8
2006 MRN Minor Capital Program Agreement No. 0622-1101
3.5.2 the Municipality will be responsible for completing the Project in accordance with
this Agreement;
3.5.3 notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement, TransLink will not be
responsible in any way for:
3.5.3.1 any deficiency or defect in the Project design, specifications,
requirements or budget;
3.5.3.2 any deficiency or defect in the Work or completion of the Project; or
3.5.3.3 any costs of completing the Project in excess of the Project budget set
out in Schedule "A".
3.5.4 TransLink will have the right to advertise or promote its participation in the
Project. TransLink's participation in the Project may be advertised or promoted
in any media format including, and without limiting the generality of the
foregoing: signs at the Project; print, radio and television advertisements; and,
electronic advertising on the World Wide Web. The Municipality retains the right
to approve of the location of signs at the Project and the content of advertisements
or promotions, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld.
4.0 TransLink Contribution
4.1 For the Project, TransLink will reimburse the Municipality, for actual Eligible Costs
incurred in connection with the Project, up to the lesser of (a) $608,500.00 (b) 50% of
[actual Eligible Costs less contributions from provincial and federal governments or
agencies], within 30 days after completion of the Project (as defined in s. 3.3) and receipt
of the following:
4.1.1 a written certificate, executed by the Municipality's City Engineer (or equivalent)
that the Project has been completed in accordance with s. 3, and meets or exceeds
engineering specifications and standards set out in Schedule "A", if any, and those
engineering specifications and standards established by the Municipality for the
Project or for similar projects; and
4.1.2 a Project cost statement, certified by the Municipality's Chief Financial Officer
(or equivalent), which must include the total amount of Eligible Costs, the total
amount of provincial and federal contributions to the Project (if any), and the
following statement:
"I certify that the Eligible Costs as stated have been incurred by the Municipality,
are attributable to this Project, are correct, and are net of the Municipal GST
rebate."
4.2 The Project budget specified in Schedule "A" will be inclusive of all applicable taxes.
Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 3 of 8
2006 MRN Minor Capital Program Agreement No. 0622-1101
4.3 All Eligible Costs submitted to TransLink for reimbursement under s. 4.1 must be
substantiated by supporting documentation. Any undocumented costs will not be
reimbursed by TransLink.
5.0 Records and Audit
5.1 The Municipality will maintain accurate and complete records in relation to all Project
costs, including, without limitation, supporting documentation of all Eligible Costs and
other expenditures related to the Project, from the date of this Agreement until two years
after the Municipality receives payment of TransLink's contribution to the Project.
5.2 TransLink will have the right to enter upon the Municipality's premises for the purpose
of auditing Project costs at any time during noixnal business hours. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, TransLink will have the right to inspect and copy any records
relating to Project costs, including any supporting documentation.
6.0 Indemnity and Release
6.1 The Municipality will indemnify and save harmless TransLink, its subsidiaries, and their
directors, officers, employees and agents, (collectively the "Indemnified Parties") from
and against any and all losses, claims, complaints (including, without limitation,
complaints pursuant to human rights legislation), damages, actions, causes of action,
fines, penalties, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, actual legal fees and
disbursements) the Indemnified Parties may sustain, incur, suffer or be put to any time,
either before or after the expiration or termination of this Agreement, arising out of, or in
connection with the Project or the Work, including, without limitation:
6.1.1 any breach of this Agreement or anything done or omitted to be done, whether
negligently or otherwise, by the Municipality or any councillor, officer, employee,
agent, contractor or subcontractor of the Municipality pursuant to this Agreement;
6.1.2 the design, engineering, construction, operation, maintenance or rehabilitation of
the Project or the Work, whether negligent or otherwise; or
6.1.3 any contravention or alleged contravention of applicable laws, statutes,
regulations, by-laws, or directions of governmental or statutory authorities issued
under lawful authority, including, without limitation, those related to the
environment, environmental protection and contaminated sites;
6.1.4 the use and occupation of the Project lands, whether negligent or otherwise; or
6.1.5 any review, inspection, audit, approval, acceptance or payment by TransLink in
relation to the design, engineering, construction, operation, maintenance or
rehabilitation of the Project or the Work;
whether or not such losses, claims complaints, damages, actions, causes of action, fines,
penalties, costs or expenses relate to the acts or omissions. whether n.gligent or
otherwise, of the Indemnified Parties.
Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 4 of 8
2006 MRN Minor Capital Program Agreement No. 0622-1101
6.2 In addition to the foregoing, and notwithstanding any other term or provision herein
contained, the Municipality, for and on behalf of itself, its councillors, officers,
employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors, hereby unconditionally, absolutely
and irrevocably releases and forever discharges the Indemnified Parties from any and all
losses, liabilities or damages, at law or in equity and whether direct, indirect or
consequential, which relate to, arise out of, or are in any way connected with the design,
engineering, construction, operation, maintenance or rehabilitation of the Project or the
Work, whether caused by, or arising through the negligence of the Indemnified Parties.
6.3 The Municipality acknowledges that the indemnity under s. 6.1 and the release under
s. 6.2 will not be affected in any way by the provisions of s. 2.
7.0 Insurance
7.1 The Municipality will, at its own expense, provide and maintain insurance with insurers
licensed in British Columbia with coverage of a type, and in amounts, that any similar
business, acting reasonable, would procure for a project of the scope, size and exposure
of this Project, during the term of this Agreement and for any subsequent ongoing
operation, maintenance and rehabilitation of the resulting infrastructure.
7.2 The Municipality shall require and ensure that each contractor and sub -contractor
involved in the Project maintains insurance comparable to those required in s. 7.1.
8.0 Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation
8.1 The parties confirm that, once the Project is completed, the Municipality will, at its cost,
operate, maintain and rehabilitate the Work, for the duration of its design life, in good
condition and in good working order as part of its public works maintenance program.
8.2 The Municipality will ensure that the Work is operated, maintained, and rehabilitated in
compliance with all applicable laws, statutes, regulations, by-laws, and directions of all
governmental and statutory authorities issues under lawful authority, including, without
limitation, any standards established by TransLink for the Work under the Act.
9.0 Default and Termination
9.1 If TransLink alleges the Municipality to be in default hereunder and gives written notice
thereof stipulating the default, and if such default continues for more than 30 days after
the delivery of such written notice, and the Municipality has not cured the default or
resolved the allegation, TransLink may elect to terminate this Agreement effective
forthwith on the giving of further notice.
10.0 Dispute Resolution
10.1 Any dispute or controversy occurring between the parties hereto relating to the
interpretation or implementation of any of the provisions of this Agreement will be
resolved by arbitration, conducted by one arbitrator. The parties will agree on the
arbitrator or, failing agreement, the arbitrator will be appointed in accordance with the
Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 5 of 8
2006 MRN Minor Capital Program Agreement No. 0622-1101
rules of the British Columbia International Commercial Arbitration Centre. Any
arbitration will be held in the City of Vancouver and conducted pursuant to the rules of
procedure of the British Columbia International Commercial Arbitration Centre and the
British Columbia Commercial Arbitration Act.
11.0 General
All notices, demands, claims or other communications required or permitted hereunder
will be in writing and may be delivered prepaid, sent by facsimile or sent by prepaid first
class mail. Any notice delivered will be deemed to have been given or received at the
time of delivery to the address of the recipient as set out below. Any notice delivered by
facsimile will be deemed to be delivered on the next day following the date of
transmission thereof. Any notice mailed as aforesaid will be deemed to have been given
and received on the fourth day following the date of its mailing. Any notice will be
addressed as follows:
To: TransLink
1600 — 4720 Kingsway
Burnaby, BC, V5H 4N2
Attention: Manager, Roads and Bridges
Facsimile No.: (604) 453-4600
To: District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge, BC, V2X 6A9
Attention: Mr. Andrew Wood, PEng,
Municipal Engineer
Facsimile No.: (604) 467-7425
11.2 This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of British
Columbia and the laws of Canada. The parties consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the
courts of the Province of British Columbia.
11.3 If any terms, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement or the application
thereof to any person or circumstance will to any extent be invalid or unenforceable, the
remainder of this Agreement or the application of that term, covenant, or condition to
persons or circumstances, other than those concerning which it is held invalid or
unenforceable, will not be affected thereby and each term, covenant, and condition of this
Agreement will be separately valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
1 1.4 Time will be of the essence under this Agreement.
11.5 The provisions contained in this Agreement constitute the entire agreement between the
parties and supersede all previous communications, representations, expectations,
understandings and agreements, whether written or unwritten, between the parties with
respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.
Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 6 of 8
2006 MRN Minor Capital Program Agreement No. 0622-1101
11.6 The Municipality may not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of
TransLink, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first
above written.
GREATER VANCOUVER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
(Authorized Signatory)
Name, Title (Please print)
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
(Authorized Signatory)
Name, Title (Please print)
(Authorized Signatory)
Name, Title (Please print)
Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 7 of 8
2006 MRN Minor Capital Program Agreement No. 0622-1101
Schedule "A"
In accordance with an undated application, the District of Maple Ridge will re -construct a rural
road cross section to an urban standard. The new section will include:
• curb;
• gutter;
• boulevard;
• sidewalk;
• bike lanes;
• two travel lanes; and
• horse trail.
(2006 — detailed design, 2007 — construction)
The total estimated cost of the project is $1,217,000.0°, as shown below. **Note any funding
provided by others, including funded covered under other TransLink agreements.
Component
Estimated Cost ($)
Clearing/removal
$ 84,000.00
Utility relocation
15,000.°°
Road work
220,000.°°
Curb and gutter
50,000.0°
Sidewalks
76,000.°°
Drainage work
465,000.°°
Street lighting
30,000.0°
Line painting
9,000.0°
Retaining walls/structures
20,000.°°
Topsoil and finish grading
16,000.°°
Sod
12,000.°°
Design and project management
100,000.0°
Contingency
120,000.0°
Subtotal of all eligible components
$1,217,000.00
Rehabilitation components
Other ineligible components
TOTAL including ineligible components
$1,217,000.°°
Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 8 of 8