The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2008-08-26 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA August 26, 2008 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber MEETING DECORUM Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be reprimanded. Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 OPENING PRAYERS Bard Warner - Burnett Fellowship Church 300 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS 400 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 500 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 501 Minutes of the Regular Council Meetings of July 22, 2008 502 Minutes of the Special Council Meeting of July 24, 2008 503 Minutes of the Public Hearing Meeting of August 19, 2008 504 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of July 18, 28, 29, 31, 2008 and August 7, 18, 19, 2008 Page 1 Council Meeting Agenda August 26, 2008 Council Chamber Page 2of6 600 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 700 DELEGATIONS 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 900 CORRESPONDENCE 1000 BY-LAWS Note: Items 1001 to 1001.2 are from the Public Hearing of August 19, 2008 Bylaws for Second and Third Readin 1001 RZ/093/06, 23024, 2300 and 23050 136 Avenue 1001.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6580-2008 To designate Eco Cluster, Conservation and Low Density Urban areas and amend the conservation and trail area. Second and third readings 1001.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6581-2008 To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1(Residential District), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) and RST (Street Townhouse Residential) to permit the development of 84 single family lots and 6 street townhouse units. Second and third readings Bylaws for Final Reading 1002 Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Amending Bylaw No. 6592- 2008 To update fees related to development applications. Final reading Council Meeting Agenda August 26, 2008 Council Chamber Page 3 of 6 COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE 1100 Minutes - August 18, 2008 The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting. Public Works and Development Services 1101 RZ/096/06, 11774 and 11756 236 Street, RS-3 to R-3, R-1 and RT-1 Staff report dated August 5, 2008 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600-2008 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6601-2008 to permit a 12 lot subdivision be given first reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. 1102 RZ/087/07, 23940 118 Avenue, RS-3 to R-1 Staff report dated August 6, 2008 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6602-2008 to permit a 5 lot subdivision be given first reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. 1103 RZ/104/07, 11224 236 Street, RS-3 to R-3 Staff report dated August 7, 2008 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6599-2008 to permit a 29 lot subdivision be given first reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. 1104 RZ/037/07, 12110 206 Street, RS-1 to RM-1 Staff report dated August 8, 2008 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6507-2007 to permit the development of a 13 unit townhouse complex be given first reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. Council Meeting Agenda August 26, 2008 Council Chamber Page 4of6 1105 DP/070/08, 22229 Brown Avenue Staff report dated August 1, 2008 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/070/08 to permit construction of a three -phased seniors' apartment development consisting of three, 4-storey apartment buildings. 1106 DP/055/07, 11919 Maple Meadows Way Staff report dated August 7, 2008 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/055/07 to permit a car dealership. 1107 DP/075/08, 21755 Lougheed Highway Staff report dated August 8, 2008 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/075/08 to regulate the form and character of a proposed service commercial development. 1108 DVP/003/08, 11580 Fir Street Staff report dated August 6, 2008 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/003/08 to reduce required carriageway widths and to not require concrete curb and sidewalk. 1109 DVP/118/07, 22703 Dewdney Trunk Road Staff report dated August 6, 2008 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/118/07 to vary the P-6 zone setback requirement for the addition to Fire Hall No. 1. 1110 Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 1.27/08, 245B Street and 104 Avenue Staff report dated July 15, 2008 recommending that Latecomer Charges be imposed and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Latecomer Agreement LC 127/08. 1111 Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 128/08, 240 Street and Hawkins Avenue Staff report dated July 15, 2008 recommending that Latecomer Charges be imposed and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Latecomer Agreement LC 128/08. Council Meeting Agenda August 26, 2008 Council Chamber Page 5 of 6 1112 Terry Fox Run, Use of Streets Staff report dated August 7, 2008 recommending that the use of municipal streets be authorized for the Terry Fox Run on Sunday, September 14, 2008. Financial and Corporate Services (Including Fire and Police) 1131 Disbursements for the month ended July 31, 2008 Staff report dated August 11, 2008 recommending that disbursements for July 2008 be approved. Community Development and Recreation Service Correspondence Other Committee Issues 1200 STAFF REPORTS 1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL 1400 MAYOR'S REPORT 1500 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS 1600 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT Council Meeting Agenda August 26, 2008 Council Chamber Page 6of6 1700 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING 1800 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC 1900 ADJOURNMENT QUESTION PERIOD The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. If a member of the public has a concern related to a Municipal staff member, it should be brought to the attention of the Mayor and/or Chief Administrative Officer in a private meeting. The decision to televise the Question Period is subject to review. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes only to ask their question (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, it will be responded to at a later date at a subsequent Council Meeting. Other opportunities to address Council may be available through the Clerk's Department who can be contacted at (604) 463-5221. Checked by, `� — - 1 Date: Oa 0 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 18, 2008 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary 1. SD/005/06 LEGAL: Lots 2-5, 22, 26, & 27, Section 32, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP30976 & Lots 1-4, Section 32, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP34871 LOCATION: 13937, 13938, 13939, 13940, 13941, 13942, 13943 Anderson Creek & 23155, 23161, 23167, 23173 Parkside Crescent OWNER: Progressive Construction REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Release of No Build Covenant (1313272724) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SD/005/06 Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman CARRIED Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member 504 14042 BCP 29120 TION) AK PARK 16 BC 0976 BCP 4871 17 18 19 20 21 22 13967 Y� ,n M v ! T 1 ' 2 15 m N N N N N N 13g63 N Z PARKS(DE CRES. 173 3 14 1396 13 26 27 4 m 11 T T �� 1 O � �1 13960 � ., a DRIv E rn r` co 0. m 10 �� , � m 5 T 4� Im 0' 3T 2T M 9 "' 6 T g 7T BCP 30976 PARK 1 c BCP 29120 r 14 i— rn BCP 16325 N ch N PARK 13920 1 13910 �'�s. 3 B1 2 E 12� r 328 3 10 4 �L, �s Ma 9I r> 5 'ss sv District of Pitt Meadows , � Valloy- I Subject Area ,Sllvar c N CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF N - MAPLE RIDGE Albion DIstdct of ,> ,r" I PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:1,500 Langley DATE: Jul 11, 2008 FILE: Untitled BY: RO Rher CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 28, 2008 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman Frank Quinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary 1. LEE & DEBORAH MADEIROS LEGAL: Lot 4, Section 29, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 2892 LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS 13360 224th Street Lee & Deborah Madeiros Floodplain Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO LEE & DEBORAH MADEIROS. Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman CARRIED Fr nk Quinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member P 9387 P 20164 Rem 5 C 7 13490 SK 2030 A 13473 13455 13442 B P 21640 Rem 3 P 2892 13432 13429 `PP149 4 13360 13339147 N 262' 5 N Subject Parcel m N d 13348 Rem 5 P 2892 P 35 P 17838 28 B 21 P 6569 13262 i¢ District of 7� Pitt Meadows , .. _ S;,vA„aY ; 13360 224st o p o Henoy �[„ CORPORATION OF - i o - THE DISTRICT OF N . . MAPLE RIDGE District of , I �� LICENSES, PERMITS & BYLAWS DEPT. Langley �w SCALE 1:2,500 �-0 � DATE: Jul 25, 2008 FILE: Untitled 8Y: AS River CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 29, 2008 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman Frank Quinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member 1.. PROGRESSIVE CONSTRUCTION LTD & RENISARY HOMES LTD. Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary LEGAL: Strata Lot A & B, both of Section 32, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCS2410 LOCATION: 22995 139A Ave OWNER: Progressive Construction Ltd & Renisary Homes Ltd. REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Section 21.9 Sump Pump Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO PROGRESSIVE CONSTRUCTION LTD & RENISARY HOMES LTD. Chairman CARRIED /a - - Frank Quin , Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member 13975 (PUMP STATION) BCP 29120 16 13967 PARK 15 13963 A K *BCP34904 14 13°�6 SL1 SL2 SL3 13 BC 2411 SLA BCS 2410 CP SLB Subject Parcels A & B C SL4 BCP30976 32 31 30 CV 0 u� � tiCO S LC N N N N N PAR 29 139 AAVE. 17 13933 f 30 (0 co � o 13g26 m 16 13927 N N N N rn N ZO 13 N18 9 31 22 21 20 19 15 No E 13923 BC 1 32 139�4 Na 0° 14 32 N24 1 32RK CA 1397 25 26 27 728 g District of Pitt Meadows -- B;Iver�nllep ; Unit 2 & 3- 22995 139A ave _� IN Ham rr CORPORATION OF i THE DISTRICT OF N o- MAPLE RIDGE D angle Of -,- Langley msa �lbi— . LICENSES, PERMITS & BYLAWS DEPT. DATE: Jul 28, 2808 FILE: untitled BY: AS SCALE 1:1,000 o River CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 31, 2008 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman Frank Quinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary 1. SD/043/07 LEGAL: Lot A, Section 16, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP25353 LOCATION: 11282 Cottonwood Dr OWNER: Meadows at Verigin's Ridge Inc REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Strata Plan THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SD/043/07. ayor Chairman al■ Fr a Quinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer M ber L rr9 °� °t A� 6 tt42a 40 $ t nL6 - 10 12 14 11440 r 13 n 11439 LM 3493 D 8 938 36 37 15 39 11355 9 t�,� a 11429 Pryy` 5 36 16 RP 1017 1 11419 17 11409 114 AVE 2, rs 35 16 4 N 11399 N 3 LMP 11097 11358 19 11369 32 33 PARK 3493$ 30 LMS 1184 PARK ,rM 1 70 3� N ttg"i1 '� ti✓ 1 tt360 LMS 3295 P 0825 tt356 b 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY B � 'Z4 tt335 113AVE. BCP 25353 PARK 11282 BCP 25353 BCP 25353 PARK A P 25975 11 11261 O"Fl, Q 11252 P 27689 14 27689 O� o° �o o= o� 0 '954 PARK IRK PARK BCP2 76 2 LMP 35190 District of Pitt Meadows ..- - - 11282 COTTONWOOD DRIVE SIN allay- ,Q � N CORPORATION OF Haney o THE DISTRICT OF N MAPLE RIDGE District of AI61an PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley SCALE 1:2,500 _ c DATE: Jun 7, 2007 FILE: SD1043107 BY: PC River CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES August 7, 2008 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Craig Speirs, Acting Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. THOMPSON, DERRICK LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot B, Section 29, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 20164 22536 136 Avenue Derrick Thompson Covenant - Floodplain THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO DERRICK THOMPSON. aig Speirs, Acting Mayor Chairman CARRIED J.L. (Jim Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Memb r N co LID Ilzr N IN N Nco LO CD CD m 00 N N N N Ln � LO 07 LO N N N N N 136 AVE. co O0F j` N N En N U) N Lo O � N N N 0.22 B 23 CD IT- C) � � Subject Parcel L N D r O N n P 93 7 District of r Pitt Meadows , .. r --' -'.i ; 22536 136ave $Ilvar Vallay r C � I r N 15 CORPORATION OF Haney Mn THE DISTRICT OF `" MAPLE RIDGE N District of ;' . Albion °'� I LICENSES, PERMITS &BYLAWS DEPT. . SCALE 1:1,000 Langley a DATE: Aug 6, 2008 FILE: Untitled BY: AS RiJer CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES August 18, 2008 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. RZ/033/06 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 1, District Lot 399, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan BCP30582 22206 - 124 Avenue EFS Hillside Developments Strata Plan THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO RZ/033/06 CARRIED F, Jordon Robson, Mayor J.L. (J' ) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Chairman Me er CALF 1:2,000 District of Pitt Meadows 22210, 22214 124 Avenue & r 12329, 12339 Hillside Avenue 0 Y CORPORATION OF �t }! Ne 1-6THEDISTRICT OF tan9 YMAPLE RIDGE -c LTnor�hFll B Lan le � os MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT e � R;,�r DATE: Jun 15, 2006 EILE:RZ1033106 d RO CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES August 19, 2008 Mayor's Office 11:7�9�1►�� Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman J.L, (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. BC HYDRO Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary LEGAL: Lot 17, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 17221; Lot 2 Except: North 130 feet, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 8333 LOCATION: 12032 Fletcher St & 12037 228 St OWNER: District of Maple Ridge REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Statutory Right -of -Way to allow BC Hydro to conduct works THAT THE CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO BC HYDRO REGISTERING A STATUTORY RIGHT-OF-WAY ON 2 DISTRICT OWNED PROPERTIES. Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman .91--t o J.L. (Jim) I ule, Chief Administrative Officer Member N 12111 1 2 In N 50' 5 12115 297 296 r 12112 121 1482101 P 6 638 Rem. 5 12142 12105 j 299 A co 12092 co 121 Rem 10 12096 o cY) P 11644 12086 Q 2 ft'-- 300 B f1 12090 n- 12 12087 N 1/2 12076 1 N 302 301 1112081 A N P 448,58 120 N S 112 BCP 30103 12080 1112071 c6 326 315 OD LU = 12062 B 0- N 12070 1- 00 12� T N 1 /2 2i 12497 � Q 1212067 L� U- J 327 a, a- 316 S 1/2 12054 12053 12464 12 12 S 1/2 7 SUBJECT PROPERTIES 12057 320 317 Rem. A 12042 12050 P 47 04 12 N 112 6 qt,12041 em. N 130' of 2 0 319 318 12038 0o S 1/2 6 12037 Rem. 2 PURDEYAVE. 17 2032 . 12028 Rem rn CO Q P 52750 310 01 16 18 N 0 CA �' 327 P 5 T , - CL a_ r- 1 Uj LU c\j co 0- E P 77489 N 15 a n" LO 1, cc C,, � 5cq M I'- 7 N 12026 N N I" N N . P 61650 N DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD N N Oco � p cq C N N N 57 N P 46839 48 00 1 11969 Q 8 ti � 1 71 7 11954 r� N District of Pitt Meadows, __ ! 12032 FLETCHER STREET & SiWer Valley I � 12037 228 STREET I .0 .* CORPORATION OF L _Haney a . THE DISTRICT OF N a�MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE fisirict of Langley Albion `l I f PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:1,500 } DATE: Aug 19, 2008 FILE: Untitled BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6580-2008. A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Section 10.3. Part IV - Silver Valley Area Flan, Figures 2, 3A and 4 of the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6580-2008." 2. Figures 2, 3A and 4 are hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 2 Section 29 Township 12 Plan 5116 New Westminster District And North 1,292 Feet Lot "B" Section 29 Township 12 Plan 5048 New Westminster District. And Lot 1 Section 29 Township 12 Plan BCP 29524 New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 757 , a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby redesignated as shown. 3. Figure 4 is hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 2 Section 29 Township 12 Plan 5116 New Westminster District And North 1,292 Feet Lot "B" Section 29 Township 12 Plan 5048 New Westminster District. And Lot 1 Section 29 Township 12 Plan BCP 29524 New Westminster District. and shown in heavy black line on Map No. 758 , a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, as added or removed from Horse Trail. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the 22nd day of July, A.D. 2008. 1001.1 PUBLIC HEARING HELD the 191hday of August, A.D. 2008. READ A SECOND TIME the day of READ A THIRD TIME the day of RECONSIDERED AND FINALLYADOPTED, the day of MAYOR , A.D. 200 . , A.D. 200. , A.D. 200. CORPORATE OFFICER MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw. No. 6580-2008 Map No. 757 PURPOSE: TO DESIGNATE AS SHOWN BELOW ON FIGURES 2, 3A & 4 AND TO DELETE THAT PORTION SHOWN ECO CLUSTER FROM CCNSERVATION ON FIGURE 4 0 ECO CLUSTER CONSERVATION ® LOW DENSITY URBAN t :3000 58 fi2 r? 78zo 18 19 2C 21 2 Jm59 A 60 61 0S 136 AVE.o 0 p a 0.619 ho. N � Of N N m B0 79 N N CP 27885 76 w 78 77 7 74 7 72 6 136 AVE. o R h ti o h h P 4,567 17 18 19 0.809 ha. 0.809 ho. 0.809 ho. BCP 29524 P 4 567 P 14756 4.057 ho P 5048 P 5116 2 N 1292' B 2 4,047 ho. 2.044 ho. 4.303 ho. 2 3.51 ho . .� 00 ' 40, LMP 9042 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUN7Y PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6580-2008 Map No. 758 PURPOSE: To Amend Figure 4 As Shown Below ■■■■■ Add Trail •ram Delete Trail Lio 1:3000 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6581-2008 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6581-2008." 2. That Part 2 Interpretation is amended by inserting the following definition in the appropriate alphabetical location within the section: STREET TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL USE means a residential use consisting of one dwelling unit vertically attached to one or more dwelling units (i.e. a duplex, triplex, or fourplex) with each dwelling unit located on a lot abutting a street. 3. That Part 3 Basic Provisions is amended by inserting the following after Section 302, Zones (1): RST Street Townhouse Residential 4. That Part 6 Residential Zones is amended by inserting the following after Section 601C and renumbering subsequent sections accordingly: 601D RST Street Townhouse Residential Intent: The Street Townhouse Residential Zone is intended for use only within the areas of Silver Valley designated as Eco-Cluster. 1001.2 1.0 Permitted Uses Only the following uses shall be permitted in the RST zone: 1. Street Townhouse Residential Use 2. Duplex Use 3. Accessory Boarding Use 4. Accessory Home Occupation Use 2.0 Conditions of Use 1. A Street Townhouse residential use shall be permitted where no more than four street townhouse residential units are attached and located on a lot abutting a public street. 2. Vehicular access for lots backing on a Municipal lane will be restricted to the lane. 3. All motor vehicle parking areas must be fully enclosed within a garage structure. 3.0 Density The maximum permitted gross floor area of a unit shall be 223 m2 (2400 s.f.), specifically excluding basement, garage, and accessory building. 4.0 Lot Coverage The maximum permitted lot coverage shall be as follows: Lot Type Maximum Lot Coverage Exterior Lot 55% Interior Lot 65% Exterior Lot on Street Corner 45% Accessory Buildings & Structures: The maximum lot coverage for accessory buildings and structures shall be 3%, which shall form part of the maximum lot coverage for the entire lot. A detached garage is not considered an accessory building in this zone. 5.0 Height of a Building or Structure The maximum height of a principal building shall be 3 storeys or 11. metres, whichever is less. The maximum height of any accessory building or structure shall be 4.6m 6.0 Setbacks If building in this zone is next to an existing single-family development, then front setback must match that of single-family neighbourhood on same side of same street*. If building in this zone is not adjacent to single-family development, then buildings and structures shall be sited in accordance with the following minimum setbacks: Building or Structure Front Rear Interior End Lot/ Corner Lot/ Side Exterior Side Exterior Side Principle Building 4m 8m Om 1.5m 3m (no lane access) See #3 below Garage (no lane 6m N/A Om 1.5m 3m access) Principle Building 4m 14m Om 1.5m 3m (lane access) Garage (lane N/A 1.5m Om 1.5m 3m access) Accessory Building N/A 0.5m 1.5m 1.5m 3m or Structure 1. Interior Side: 0 metre permitted where listed above, provided that the full length of the interior side wall of the principle building and/or garage is adjoined to the full length of the interior side wall of a neighbouring principle building and/or garage. Where a fee -simple subdivision results in no common property ownership among the attached units, the property line will run equally distant through the attached interior walls. 2. On a lot with rear lane access: a) Each lot shall have useable rear yard private outdoor space with minimum dimensions of 6.5m x 7.5m that is defined by fences and landscaping. b) Accessory buildings larger than 5m2 are not permitted in the rear yard private outdoor space. c) A minimum 1.5 metre wide walkway must be maintained along the length of the garage, into the rear laneway. This walkway does not make up any part of the private outdoor space requirement. 3. On a lot with no lane access, the rear yard setback maybe reduced to a minimum of 6 metres if the rear yard backs onto a greenbelt that is dedicated as Conservation Area or Park. 4. All accessory buildings and structures must be located in the rear yard. 7.0 Minimum Lot Size Lot Type Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Exterior Lot 234m2 9m Interior Lot 195m2 7.5m Exterior Lot on Street Corner 273m2 10.5m * In a neighbourhood where redevelopment is expected and the current zoning of the single- family neighbourhood in question is not consistent with the designation in the Official Community Plan, or the zoning matrix within the Official Community Plan, the front setback must match that of a zone that would be consistent with the current Official Community Plan. 5 0 8.0 Parking Requirements To be the same requirements listed in Schedule "A", under 1.0 b) for one and two family residential use in the Maple Ridge Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990. 9.0 Other Regulations 1. A Street Townhouse Residential use shall be permitted only if the site is serviced to the RT-1 zone standard, excluding road standards, set out in the Maple Ridge Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 4800-1993. 2. A Street Townhouse Residential use shall be permitted only if the site is serviced to the Eco-Cluster road standards identified within the Silver Valley Area Plan. That Schedule "D" Minimum Lot Area Dimensions is amended by inserting the following under each heading: Zone: RST Minimum Width: See Section 601D, Item 7.0 Minimum Lot Size Minimum Area: See Section 601D, Item 7.0 Minimum Lot Size Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 2 Section 29 Township 12 Plan 5116 New Westminster District And North 1,292 Feet Lot "B" Section 29 Township 12 Plan 5048 New Westminster District. And Lot 1 Section 29 Township 12 Plan BCP 29524 New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line are hereby rezoned as shown on Map No. 1431, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw. 7. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 22nd day of July, A.D. 2008. PUBLIC HEARING held the 19th day of August, A.D. 2008. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER 59 61 �. 0� ro h N h h 1 N N r N N N N 60 0s o 0 136 AVE, o N LOL.6119ha. O N CP 27855 76 U 80 79 78 77 7 7 7 72 136 AVE. h 0 N h N N h 0. P 4 567 17 0. 18 19 0-809 ha. 0.809 ha. 0.809 ha. 0. 6CP 29524 P 4 567 P 14756 1 57 ha P 5116 0' 2 8 2 - Q i.444 ha, 0 4.303 ha. 0 2 3.51 ha LMP 9042 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw - No. 6581 —2008 Map No. 1431 From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) �RS—lb(One Family Urbon(medium density)Residential) 0 R-1 (Residential District) To: R-3((Special Amenity ResidentiaE District) RST(Street Townhouse Residential) yam. MAPLE RIDGE British Columba_ 1 :3000 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6592-2008 A bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Bylaw No. 5949-2001 WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to further amend Maple Ridge Development Applications Fee Bylaw No. 5949-2001 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1 This bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Amending Bylaw No. 6592-2008". 2 Bylaw No. 5949-2001 is hereby amended by deleting Schedule "A" in its entirety and replacing it with the attached Schedule "A". READ a first time on the 21st day of July, 2008 READ a second time on the 215t day of July, 2008 READ a third time on the 215t day of July, 2008 RECONSIDERED and ADOPTED this day of , 2008 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Attachments: Schedule "A" 1002 Schedule "A" A. REZONING (a) to permit single family residential development (b) to permit multi -family residential development (c) to permit commercial, industrial or institutional development (d) to change the text of the Zoning Bylaw: (i) where not accompanied by an application to amend the zoning of land (e) to extend an inactive rezoning application (f) to permit a Comprehensive Development Zone (additional to rezoning) B. AMENDMENTS TO THE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN (a) where accompanied by an application for rezoning (b) where not accompanied by an application for rezoning (c) to permit a temporary industrial use permit/ temporary commercial use permit C. DEVELOPMENT PERMITS FOR ONE SINGLE FAMILY UNIT (Environmental) DEVELOPMENT PERMITS FOR ALL OTHER PURPOSES MINOR AMENDMENTS TO AN ISSUED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT D. DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMITS FOR A SINGLE FAMILY UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMITS FOR ALL OTHER PURPOSES E. TEMPORARY COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE PERMITS F. Deleted by Bylaw 6059-2002 Nov.1 Apr.1 Apr.1 Apr.1 2008 2009 2010 2011 $2,303.00 $2,383.00 $2,479.00 $2,578.00 $4,206.00 $4,353.00 $4,527.00 $4,708.00 $4,206.00 $4,353.00 $4,527.00 $4,708.00 $1,709.00 $1,769.00 $1,839.00 $1,913.00 $606.00 $627.00 $652.00 $678.00 $1,818.00 $1,882.00 $1,957.00 $2,035.00 $939.00 $972.00 $1,011.00 $1,052.00 $1,709.00 $1,769.00 $1,839.00 $1,913.00 $1,709.00 $1,769.00 $1,839.00 $1,913.00 $618.00 $640.00 $665.00 $692.00 $2,182.00 $2,258.00 $2,348.00 $2,442.00 $300.00 $311.00 - $323.00 $336.00 $945.00 $978.00 $1,018.00 $1,058.00 $2,182.00 $2,258.00 $2,348.00 $2,442.00 $1,879.00 $1.,944.00 $2,022.00 $2,103.00 G. STRATA TITLE CONVERSION $927.00 $960.00 $998.00 $1,038.00 Schedule "A" Nov.1 Apr.1 Apr.1 Apr.1 2008 2009 2010 2011 H. SUBDIVISIONS (a) Subdivision Examination $970.00 $1,004.00 $1,044,00 $1,085.00 (consolidation/lot line adjustment) (b) Subdivision/Bareland Strata Examination $2,163.00 $2,239.00 $2,329.00 $2,422.00 (2 or more lots) (c) Approval Fee - per new lot '$61.00 $63.00 $65.00 $68-00 (d) Phased Strata Examination $309.00 $320.00 $333.00 $346.00 (e) Intent to create a Strata Plan by $188.00 $194.00 $202.00 $210.00 declaration of Phased Development (Form E) approval (f) Preliminary Subdivision Approval $309.00 $320.00 $333.00 $346.00 Renewal I. HERITAGE ALTERATION PERMITS $61.00 $63.00 $65.00 $68.00 J. PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING K. LAND USE INFORMATION LETTERS L. ADMINISTRATION CHARGE M. PUBLIC HEARING FEE N. SOIL PERMIT (see Bylaw No. 4570-1991) (a) within the Agricultural Land Reserve (b) outside of the Agricultural Land Reserve (see Bylaw No. 4570-1991) (c) security 0. TREE CUTTING PERMIT (see Bylaw 5896-2001) (a) more than 3 trees on a parcel of one (1) hectare or less (b) more than 3 trees on a parcel of one (1) hectare or more (c) tree replacement P. LANDSCAPE DESIGN REVIEW AND INSPECTION fees based on 2% of landscaping value minimum maximum $242.00 $251.00 $261.00 $271.00 $121.00 $125.00 $130.00 $136.00 $242.00 $251.00 $261.00 $271,00 $788.00 $815.00 $848.00 $882.00 $667.00 $690.00 $718.00 $746.00 $182.00 $188.00 $196.00 $ 204.00 (see Bylaw No. 4570-1991) $182.00 $188.00 $196.00 $ 204.00 $364.00 $376.00 $391.00 $407.00 $485.00 $502.00 $522.00 $543.00 $250.00 $259.00 $269,00 $280.00 $2,500.00 $2,588.00 $2,691.00 $2,799.00 } f -- Deep Roots Greater Heights 11 Rl,i:0•111100 LTA r_A1ma:a zNa TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 5, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/096/06 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600-2008 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6601-2008 11774 and 11756 236 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to amend the Official Community Plan to increase the designated Conservation area and to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), R-1 (Residential District), and RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential). This application is to support a 12 lot subdivision. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600-2008 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and on -going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600-2008 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a public hearing on the bylaw; 3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600-2008 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600- 2008 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6601-2008 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. a. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; b. Amendment to Schedule "B" & "C" of the Official Community Plan; 1101 C. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; d. Road dedication as required; e. Removal of the existing buildings; f. A Restrictive Covenant for the duplex design must be registered at the Land Title Office; g. Park dedication as required. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Wayne Bissky Owner: Howard M Kosaka Legal Description: Lot: 55, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: 26073 and Lot: 56, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: 26073 Existing: Urban Residential and Conservation Proposed: Urban Residential and Conservation Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), R-1 (Residential District), and RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation Urban Residential and Conservation South: Use: Currently: Single Family Residential; Proposed: Single Family Residential and Park Zone: Currently: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential); Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: CD-1-93 and RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation West: Use: Townhouses Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Urban Residential -2- Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential and Two Family Residential Site Area: 1.294 HA (3.19 acres) Access: 236 Street and 118 Avenue Servicing: Full Urban Companion Applications: SD/096/06 b) Project Description: Application RZ/096/06 proposes to amend the Official Community Plan and proposes to rezone the property located at 11774 and 11756 236 ST. The Official Community Plan amendment will increase the designated conservation area to protect Cottonwood Creek. The rezoning will rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District, R-1 (Residential District), and RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential). This application is to support a 12 lot subdivision. The proposed size of each lot is not less than 2990 m2 (0.738 acres) Road dedication will be provided along 236 Street. A large portion of the middle of the subject property will be dedicated as park for geotechnical reasons and for the protection of Cottonwood Creek. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, which states that "the land is safe for geotechnical support of the proposed building foundations and backyards..." c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject property is designated Urban Residential and 236 Street and 118 Avenue are identified as major corridor. Accordingto the zoning matrix, this designation supports the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District, R-1(Residential District), and RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zones. 3-20 Major Corridor Residential Infill developments must be designed to be compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood and will be evaluated against the following criteria: (a) building forms such as single detached dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhouses, apartments, and small lot intensive residential development subject to Policy 3-21. (b) maximum building height of two and one-half storeys with an emphasis on ground oriented units for all developments except for apartments. The proposed R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone has a maximum height of 9.75 metres and 2 storey in height. The proposed R-1 (Residential District) zone has a maximum height of 9.5 metres. The proposed RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zone has a maximum height of 935 metres for a Two Family Residential Use. Those properties zoned R-3 (Special Amenity District) will also be subject to an Intensive Residential Development Permit to ensure a vibrant street presence. -3- (c) a maximum height of four storeys for apartments This is not applicable as the proposal is for single family lots. (d) adherence to Development Permit Guidelines for multi -family and intensive residential development as outlined in Chapter 8 of the Official Community Plan. The proposed R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) lots fronting 236 Street will require an Intensive Residential Development and should comply with the applicable Guidelines. 3-21 All Neighbourhood and Major Corridor Residential infill development will respect and reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of established neighbourhoods, with particular attention to: (a) the ability of the existing infrastructure to support the new development The proposed lots will be serviced by municipal services. (b) the compatibility of the site design, setbacks and lot configuration with the existing pattern of development in the area. The proposal is consistent with the pattern of development in the surrounding area. The proposed R-1 (Residential District) and RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) lots front 118 Avenue, which face the larger single family lots to the north. The proposed higher density R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) lots front 236 Street and face townhouses. (c) the compatibility between building massing and the type of dwelling units in the proposed development and the surrounding residential properties. The single family residential and two family residential lots in the proposed subdivision are compatible with the surrounding single family residential and multi -family residential lots in the surrounding area. (d) the location, orientation, and visual impact of vehicle access/egress in relation to: i. adjacent developments ii. the street iii. the pedestrian environment The applicant will be required to plant street trees and as part of the Intensive Residential Development Permit the applicant will provide a conceptual landscaping plan for the proposed lots fronting. 236 Street, which will help to minimize the impact of vehicle access/egress. (e) Minimizing adverse parking and traffic impacts on the existing neighbourhood Each proposed lot will be required to provide two off-street parking spaces. (f) A gradual transition of scale and density through the design of building mass and form, such as: i. Reduction in building heights at the edges of a development; ii. Location of lower density components towards the perimeters of a site; and iii. Concentration of density to the centre of a development or towards a non-residential boundary The proposed subdivision is consistent with the density in the surrounding neighbourhood and the proposal has a smaller scale than the existing townhouses to the west. (g) retention and preservation of significant trees, other natural vegetation, and environmental features. The centre portion of the subject property will be dedicated as park to protect the ravine and Cottonwood Creek. (h) maintaining adequate light, view and privacy for residents on adjacent properties or in adjacent neighbourhoods; The proposed subdivision is for single family dwellings and duplex; therefore, there should be minimal impacts on light, view, and privacy. (i) Conservation of special landscapes such as gardens, or built -form features, including heritage buildings, that contribute to the unique character of the neighbourhood. This is not applicable as there are no special landscapes or built -form features. Zoning Bylaw: The proposed 12 lot subdivision layout is compatible with the surrounding area and complies with the minimum lot width, lot depth, and lot area requirements of the proposed R-3 (Special Amenity Residential Distrcit, R-1 (Residential District), and RT-1(Two Family Urban Residential). Development Permits: The proposed lots fronting 236 Street are proposed to be zoned R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District); therefore, these lots will be subject to an Intensive Residential Development Permit. The purpose of the Intensive Residential Development Permit is to provide a greater emphasis on high standards in aesthetics and quality of the building environment while protection important qualities of the natural environment. -5- Cottonwood Creek runs through the centre of the property; therefore, the property is subject to a Watercourse Protection Development Permit. Dedication of the centre portion of the subject property will be required to protect this watercourse. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has reviewed the application and has provided the following comments: 1. Remove existing curb letdown and reconstruct curb on south side of 118 Avenue, 55 metres west of 236B Street. 2. Concrete sidewalk and boulevard construction is required along the south side of 118 Avenue, from 60 metres east of 236 Street to the crosswalk at the west side of 236B Street. 3. There is a need for 1.9 metres of road dedication along the 236 Street front plus a 3 metre by 3 metre corner truncation at the intersection. 4. At the subdivision stage a Development Variance Permit will be required to retain the existing aboveground utility company plant along the east side of 236 Street fronting the site. 5. To provide access and service connections to the proposed Lot 12 at the subdivision stage it will be necessary to remove part of an existing retaining wall and to construct a new wall that will support the 118 Avenue road and the lot driveway. 6. The sanitary sewer and storm sewer connections for the duplex on Lot 12 exists on 118 Avenue. The storm sewer is shallower than the sanitary sewer so this will increase the elevation of the building footing. e) School District Comments: A referral has been sent to the School District for comments. Any comments will be provided prior to the Public Hearing. f) Intergovernmental Issues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, to increase the Conservation boundary ME is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. g) Environmental Implications: There is a large ravine that runs through the middle of the property and Cottonwood Creek runs through this portion of land. Therefore, to protect these areas, the applicant will be required to dedicate this portion of land to the District. CONCLUSION: The proposed R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), R-1 (Residential District), and RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zones conforms to the land use designation in the Official Community Plan. It is therefore recommended that application RZ/096/06 be favourably considered and that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600-2008 (Appendix B) and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6601-2008 (Appendix C) be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Prepa by: Adi a Leung PlaFc ing Technician ,Appro y: a Pick g, P, MCIP or of Planning Approved by. Frank Quinn, MBA, P.E99-1 GM: Pubhe Works evelo ment Services \� L"-Lrti Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Mule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - OCP Amending Bylaw 6600-2008 Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw 6601-2008 Appendix D - Proposed Subdivision Layout -7- 119 AVE. "A" MS 2415 I PARK A LMS 1818 LMS 1421 1 N SCALE 1:2,500 igpp�end�x A 119 AVE. 11888 11 11899 1 t 7 8 10 11 11899 N H 17098 N 9 fn 11892 11880 B �' 10 9N 8N 7 N 12 8 11897 2 rri 11888 f j `O LM 2 307 04 11887 � 11� fV 6 11870 n C N 131ee1 m 7 C\1 3 PARK a 10ir 1 2 m 3 214 rtOi CV 1,ea2 6 M 1188 11873 11076 !1 4 ^ �� VV 1/2 �5 11856 g 9 -� m 0 8 15 1186.5 7 5 J 21 9 118AAVE. 4 29 a 7 11984 P 1676 11850 � ti.�!= 16 3 8 ro 1,.5, 11854 11840 6^� `�N' c0 17 2 5 n 4 11841 11842 27 11828 aIj 18 11820 REM. 22 a MP L127 11629 1 6 24 23 22 21 i 191617 P 1676 11818 2 12 N 3 2011ei1 PA 11e 118 AVE. 1774 1 2 3 4 1176 18 1$ n SUBJECT PROPERTIES P 2607 N B 10 2 1795 15� v B 16 I , 6 1� 11792 55 7 11757 1758 11744 11737 District of _ Pitt Meadows District of Langley 1692 valw„ 56 1 j�;a 1P 'rim 15 8 '�yd 14 PARK 13 Lh 12 PARK 367 .•�` 10 2 1BCP 50 BCP 1 9 2 r B 4 r, 5 LMP 30235 j 11Q� Q 1 a 7 Y 118T7 11e 8 11667 V H66 9 11859 3 10 11 Rem. 1 11053 q 11 11 LMP 32605 PARK 11645 12 w � m� 11837 LMP 13 11033 14 11756 & 11774 236 STREET 0 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF ~� MAPLE RIDGE MAPLEREDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Oct 6, 2006 FILE: RZ/096/06 BY: PC R,er Afr,d'x 6 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6600-2008 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "B" & "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6600-2008 2. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 55 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 26073 New Westminster District And Lot 56 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 26073 New Westminster District And outlined in heavy black line are hereby amended as shown on Map No. 761, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw 3. Schedule "C" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 55 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 26073 New Westminster District And Lot 56 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 26073 New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black, are hereby amended by adding and removing Conservation as shown on Map No. 762 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 200. READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 200. READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER 11880 B ry R' �' N 7189 g 121188 17897 118 A" p �M 9 82 307 > 1 88 2 N i 18 6 EN 2.58 ha 11870 C 1 1311ee7 7 N 3 g 2415 N 2 n 3 LL 77682 N 1t8 PARK a, 71860 L o '� n J 11873 ' 71876 6 � 4 2540�' v N 11 `�' 5 d 1�1�' 5 W 1 2 MP1181 11865 1 8sss ).17864 a 21 LMP11 36 118 A AVE. 4 / RK 2� a_7 / 17 `r g � J N 1 61185 11854 3 / �� P 1 676 �504 28 11$4tl �❑ B 56 y h N of P 17 2 27 �p 1826 -` 18 11820 11529 1 REM/22 i�g22 �aP 26 J LMP 1 726 a 19 / 1ga�~ 24 23 g 22 21 h J 71817 a / / P 1676 f 25 11811 PARK M N ry N 20 / M ry 11806 A 11774 ry1 ry23 4 11 1 18ry�' 2.2235 ha 73 8 P 1 5921179 5 117916 7 6 5 LMS 1818 09 ha 15 �c L 8 14 m I 11763 21 17757 PARK 77756 t.2s7 na BCP 0392 BCP 4650 11744 177.37 B 3 MS 1421 4 1 2.58 ha 5 LIMP 30235 3.267 ha 6 4 7 PARK BCP 23179 8 77692 1166 [�i 9 58 11ss P 34262 10 r 11s 0.809 ha 11 A 11s4 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6600-2008 Map No. 761 From: Conservation and Residential To: Residential and Conservation(shown hatched) r 1 :2500 ry ry ry ry Tv I89 10 17898 "� h 1 7 8 n 1892 718B0 10 9 8 7 N 12 g 9 7>8s7 2 M 1186 A" G Lml, 2 307 1188 71888 N EA: 2.58 ha M 11870 a C 13 71887 N 7 (0 cv 3 9 PARK 2415 0 2^ 3 LL 11882 ry 1�8 10� 1186 1 p a �3 ry ^ L �14 1 >87i 17875 6 0_ 4 W 1/2 '--- 25405 v 11856� N 8 Q3 15 17665 1 5 5 21 MP1g1$1 LMP11 s 36 118 A AVE. 4 / RK 2 718° 7 1677 77864 3 fr P 1676 28 11854 ��1/ �r 4 77840 �+� ti `- 17 2 11842 5 4ry 17847 �_ r g_ 727 7 1 8 11829 11820 1 REM �22 c- c P 1 g2,5 26 L ? 19 v / / ��pAP 77 1 24 23 2 2 2 17877 \ / P 1676 r' 25 2011871 PARK r � 118 A 11774 hz , hz 1 2� 3 4 17 18 N 2.2235 ha 73 B P 1 5�21779 + 7 1179 16 5 ?6 5 LMS 1818 09 ha � \, � �1 P '�l 5 a 8 14 m 11763 13 � 11757 21 �17 66 - 12PARK 10 11 71756 1.287 ha 1BCP 0392� BCP 4650 11744 71797 _MS 1 421 B 4 2.58 haN '>> 1 cc 5 LMP 30235 6 'rs9 3.267 ha Q 7 PARK °ys23 71692 BCP 23179 8 1Y66 [�i 9 58 1165 P 34262 10 >76 0.809 ha 11 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6600-2008 Map No. 762 PURPOSE: TO ADD TO CONSERVATION ON SCHEDULE C TO REMOVE FROM CONSERVATION ON SCHEDULE C MAPLE RIDGE 1:2500 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6601-2008 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6601-2008." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 55 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 26073 New Westminster District And Lot 56 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 26073 New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line are hereby rezoned as shown on Map No. 1434 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of MAYOR , A.D. 200 . CORPORATE OFFICER 118819 B N 9 10 9 8 7 1 211 8 N 11 1897 n 1188b F N B LM 2 307 11888 N 6 2.58 ha 2415 11870 0_ N C 13 F cp 118E1 m 11BB27 `- 3169 PARK 1 7186o N 1 2 n 3 14 o cv o ^ J 1187J N 11B76 6 4 -,, s— --- 5405 V 11B5g6� ° 15 N N 118ss 5 N � 5 w2i/2 MP 181 8 sss 71 1 1 36 118 A AVE. 4 J KP 71884 // 11850P � 2 co a 3 N 1 6118 � 1676 �6d� 11B O N 71854 6 4r R ry ti! 4 p g 12 ti 5 ry 4 1 711B41 11642 2 �Q / GM? — — a2?— — 11 27 18 11820 1>829 REM ./22 — 26 1 L3 19 / �g$2� ��LphP 11818 24 22 2 2� M 1181 v & / P 1676 25 11809 N N `��+ N 20»811 PARK nt N 118 AVE. A 11774 �1 2�3 4 17 18hN1 2.2235 ha P 26 73 P 1 7921179 55 11 � 75?3 7}6 5 16 ys 11792 LMS 1818 0.809 ha m j '�15 �,y'1 ` 8 14 P 1176J � � 11757 13 9 3 1 tt�55 _- 12 10 1 PARK 1 s 1 7 ° BCP 0392 BCP 4650 11744 >1737 3 5 1 421 2.58 ha ^cV LMP 30235 >>� 3.267 ha 6 PARK Q 7 � BCP 23179 Y 8 11592 1166 v 911 58 P 34262 10 r 1165 0.809 ha a 11 A PAPW 1154 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6601 —2008 Map No. 1434 From: RS-3(One - Family Rural Residential) = R-1 (Residential District) M RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) To: R-3(Special Amenity Residential District) MAPLE RlDrE 1:2500 a6piy aide yy-,..�:. F� - !_ '180AS 419£Z - 9SL L L 'R 4LL L L uoeoi q pad peon 90/960/ZM wawdo�anaa 4MAA Ueld 91!S Lf 'e '-•; �eiluapisaa rasodad "31. a ,3NNVM SZE s m / N � ymi m m m i i a SR/W Plan KP7 394 / — — — — — — - S �• � A 9 ar �; gg \ \ s'g9e CC •r 'iSJ�� Ra ° m� i 1- Deep Roots Greater Heights DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 06, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/O87/O7 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6602-2008 23940 118 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1 (Residential District), to support a 5 lot subdivision. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6602-2008 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: a. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; b. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; C. Park dedication as required. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Leigh A Holt Owner: Leigh A Holt, Sheena Holt, Kamaft Ventures Ltd Legal Description: Lot: 29, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: 18230 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential and Conservation Proposed: Urban Residential and Conservation 1102 Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: R-1 (Residential District) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation Urban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: CD-1-93 (Comprehensive Development) Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation West: Use: Single Family Residential and Conservation Zone: RS-3 Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 0.615 HA (1.519 acres) 118 Avenue and 117B Avenue Full Urban SD/087/07 Application RZ/087/07 proposes to rezone the property located at 23940 118 Avenue from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1 (Residential District). This application is in support of subdivision application SD/087/07, which is for a 5 lot subdivision. The proposed size of each lot is not less than 374 m2 (4025 ft2). Currently, proposed Lot 1 has an existing house that the applicant would like to retain. Proposed Lot 1 will be meat -hooked to a portion of land on the east side of proposed Lot 2. At the subdivision stage, this portion of land will have a no -build covenant placed over it to ensure that future subdivision potential is possible with the properties to east. At the subdivision stage, proposed Lot 1 will also have a right-of-way registered on title to allow for a temporary turnaround in the lane. The south portion of the subject property will be dedicated as park for the protection of Horseshoe Creek. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report to review the slopes to the south. The report states "the lands may be used safely for the use intended". -2- c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject property is designated Urban Residential and 118 Avenue is identified as a major corridor. According to the zoning matrix, this designation supports the R-1(Residential) zone. The following Official Community Plan Residential Infill and Compatibility Criteria apply to the proposed rezoning: 3-20 Major Corridor Residential Infill developments must be designed to be compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood and will be evaluated against the following criteria: (a) building forms such as single detached dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhouses, apartments, and small lot intensive. residential development subject to Policy 3-21 (b) maximum building height of two and one-half storeys with an emphasis on ground oriented units for all developments except for apartments. The proposed R-1(Residentiall District) zone has a maximum height of 9.5 metres. (c) a maximum height of four storeys for apartments This is not applicable as the proposal is for single family lots. (d) adherence to Development Permit Guidelines for multi -family and intensive residential development as outlined in Chapter 8 of the Official Community Plan. The proposal is not subject to a multi -family or intensive residential development permit 3-21 All Neighbourhood and Major Corridor Residential infill development will respect and reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of established neighbourhoods, with particular attention to: (a) the ability of the existing infrastructure to support the new development The proposed lots will be serviced by municipal services. (b) the compatibility of the site design, setbacks and lot configuration with the existing pattern of development in the area. The proposal is consistent with the surrounding area and carries on the pattern of development that has occurred to the west. -3- (c) the compatibility between building massing and the type of dwelling units in the proposed development and the surrounding residential properties. The surrounding residential properties are single family dwellings; therefore, this proposal will be compatible with the type of dwelling units in the area. The massing should also be similar to those developments to the west as the lot sizes are consistent. (d) the location, orientation, and visual impact of vehicle access/egress in relation to: i. adjacent developments ii. the street iii, the pedestrian environment Proposed lots 1-3 will have rear lane access and lots 4 and 5 will be access from 117B Avenue. The applicant will be required to plant street trees. (e) Minimizing adverse parking and traffic impacts on the existing neighbourhood Each proposed lot will be required to provide two off-street parking spaces. (f) A gradual transition of scale and density through the design of building mass and form, such as: i. Reduction in building heights at the edges of a development; ii. Location of lower density components towards the perimeters of a site; and iii. Concentration of density to the centre of a development or towards a non-residential boundary The proposed subdivision is consistent with the density in the surrounding neighbourhood. (g) retention and preservation of significant trees, other natural vegetation, and environmental features. The south portion of the property will be dedicated as park to ensure the protection of Horseshoe Creek. (h) maintaining adequate. light, view and privacy for residents on adjacent properties or in adjacent neighbourhoods; The proposed subdivision is for single family dwellings; therefore, there should be minimal impacts on light, view, and privacy. (i) Conservation of special landscapes such as gardens, or built -form features, including heritage buildings, that contribute to the unique character of the neighbourhood. This is not applicable as there are no special landscapes or built -form features. -4- Zoning Bylaw: The proposed 5 lot subdivision layout is compatible with the surrounding area and complies with the minimum lot width, lot depth, and lot area requirements of the R-1 (Residential District) zone. Development Permits: Horseshoe Creek is located to the south of the property; therefore, the property is subject to a Watercourse Protection Development Permit. Dedication of the south portion of the subject property will be required to protect this watercourse. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has reviewed the application and has provided the following comments: 1. A geotechnical engineer review will be required to determine the suitability of the site. The review needs to look at the south portion of the site as there might be fill there. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, which states that the "lands may be safely used for its intended purposes". The applicant has also submitted a geotechnical addendum letter, which further reviews the south portion of the site and also states that the "the lands may be used safely for the use intended". 2. There will be a Latecomer Charge payable at the subdivision stage, as well as a possible charge for connection to the sanitary sewer service connection at 118 Avenue. e) Environmental Implications: Horseshoe Creek is located to the south of the Subject property. Therefore, the property is subject to a Watercourse Protection Development Permit. The south portion of the property will be dedicated as park to protect this watercourse. -5- CONCLUSION: The proposed R-1 (Residential District) zone conforms to the land use designation in the Official Community Plan. It is therefore recommended that application RZ/087/07 be favourably considered and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6602-2008 (Appendix B) be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Prepared b . A ina Le Plar7g Technician J App ed b . ne P' rin , CP, MCIP Director of lanning Approved by: Flank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. L,/ Rule F Ch' f Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw 6602-2008 Appendix D - Site Plan 3 13856 N N N N N `r�N46 5 N 118AAVE. 4 M 11846 11840 m o N m 00 co M Cl) 16 M 17 M 18 N 19 3° N 8 N 9 N 10 LMP 180 1 11828 (P 21864) LMP 1181b 2 15 P 23165 52 9 11816 18051 11811 11804 11 12 13 11806 49 50 51 1 M co co 0) 00 14 0) r m m 0) 53 N Cl) co N `LMP 28456 N N N 11805 11830 f118 AVE. m r• '0 N m m m o a m m m o in m m 11787 6N 7N ro 1N 2N m m m 3N 4 N CO m m N N m m m co N m N N m Cl) N rn M N 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 38 LM 46 17 LMP 4 797 11773 P 0411 11M 3,9 Subject Property 40 10 78 L P 88 4 T97 9 121 10 9 8 7 117so 1 2 3 4 5 LM1P 11765 yw r=r m mm m 00 ov m Cl) onAm�yymm 0 41 NNNNN N N P 20411 117 SAVE. 30 5 16 N m o m m rn N ya pq, W o W 000 a N N 00 W m 17 4 N N 3 W N 2 N 1 N N N N W Cl) O 18 BC 148 8 13 14 15 16 1 W ''ems 5 L P 3797 1n11 6 �ti� P 182 0 Q10 8 r B 16 m P 13265 .1 17 >>r0 PART{ PARK 2a rr11 LMP 43796 a 19np 12 � rr 13 ors oQ �G 14 a9s goo 's 15 QQ PARK LMP 36718 m '% 26 25 r 148 8 25 94 District of -- Pitt Meadows ' I Nanny NDistrict of Langley SCALE 1:2,000 A EP 35041 t 2 BCP 12400 SL1 ccrry� $ 2111 (�•] n] OM7 c+7 r�7 � � � 11693 U) 11673 1 N . 23940-118 Ave F C r O_ .N ur r ! * CORPORATION OF i = THE DISTRICT OF Z_ - MAPLE RIDGE inn PLANNING DEPARTMENT �� DATE: Oct 17, 2007 RZ/087/07 BY: JV ver Ri Appendix B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6602-2008 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6602-2008." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: East 105 feet Lot 29 Section 16 Township 12 Plan 18230 New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1435 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1(Residential District) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the 1/ I C day of , A.D. 200. CORPORATE OFFICER {.' ' 6 Da 7185LM 5 N 4i186 11868 s\ 11868�- A LM 180 1 5 Co 'Q7 1184s N 24q 23q 22Q 21q 20� 4 m ti 6 ry ry N h ry 78 J l785P Co 1185s 118 a AVE. 11�4 4300 44 N 5 0_ 4 1183 17646 1l840 to l n e m y 16 H17 N18 ti ti19 45 Iv82 11828� M (P 21864) h 8 h 9 h10 LM 1 051 46182 LMP 71818 P 299 1Ia4s 2 118l6 g 1 15 231 5 52 118I ! l8a4 q ql 1 J13 11806 hN50 L""'l 0, 51 'L1AP N h a S3 1 2t56 !80 ! 18J0 118 AVE. 1 y� tip � 6� 2n 3n+ 4h � � trpi q h � 1179 39 2 � h 7 lry h n, h n n h h Q 3 'ems 1 L 58 7 2 M 3 4 5 6 37 7 38 P 20411/77 1 L P 88 2 M 7 7 4011� 10 2� 3q.A 5^ 121�19�36 a7 1175 Ci� ry w ^7 N ry N 41 F� 1] e- P 20411 �, 1 117 8 AVE. N 30 q7 ppyy �i "5 N tij "5 17 h 4h 8C 1 82 h h h ry h w % 1 5 6C 14q L P 37 7 1171 f r '?}0 6`N - 2 �11a CO 8 _ P 1 230 2 tr y� B 22 1 17�s 1 9 m P 13265 ryt�� 0 1111 PARK PARK LMP 43796 0.615 ha 0.953 ha 0.684 ha I7748 Q f ��r� 21 G '. " ti A ' �� EP 35041 -Z 22 a 2 � Q PARK o.aas na �* 0.55 ha rr1 2 cc a0 LMP 36718 1.33 ha N j - 2 24 ,�2 a 11673 o N BC 1 2 BCP 12400 J 11634 CD 25 $Ll I r�'1 ff) In 1�1 N � N 0.800 ha J J J J J J J J J MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6602-2008 Map No. 1435 From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) To: R-1 (Residential District) MAPLE -. 1:2500 Append ix C This drawing and design is the property of McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. and shall not be used, reused or reproduced without the consent of the said company. McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. will not be held responsible for the improper or unauthorized use of this drawing and design. LJ IX 171 LLLJ C" N 118 AVENUE t TdW I. (I,Q' 3203 �� J ROW for Temp Turnaround I I �37Ap w L3 l;l 2 �;s0 •A 12,03 12.00 8.02 L—LJ 117E AVENUE Li--_--J L 4IT I l35 Bryn. T 602 w„rc„ I I I6J0�� -c� Develop nt Permit Area 50m from - To of Bank POINTS FLAGGED AS TOP OF BANK BY Park TRITON 2,029sq.m. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. F'N Ni OF CONCEP1llAl, POV PArWN 15 P: QUIKK 'Cotal Area approx. 6150 sq,m, (02 ac) ayout assumes p I zone; minimum 371 eq,m, 12,Om 24.Om deep IA McElhanney McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. 13160-88TH_AVENUE PHONE(604)596-0391 SURREY,B.c. FAX(604)596-8853 W j— -----� iF-------I Vv—) P of SCALE-:- 1:1000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80m ( ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES ) NOTES: — PRELIMINARY LAYOUT ONLY, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL. — AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO DETAILED SURVEY AND CALCULATION, AND MAY VARY. - NOT TO BE USED FOR LEGAL TRANSACTIONS. Sketch 4 Scale: 1:1000 November 29 '07 Date: February 2007 pevlsed Pecember 18 '01 Job No.: 21 1 1-024 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 7, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/104/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6599-2008 11224 236 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), to support a 29 lot subdivision. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6599-2008 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. a. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; b. Registration of the final geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; G. Finalization of a purchasing agreement with the District of Maple Ridge for a portion of 112 Avenue. d. Road dedication as required; e. Removal of the existing buildings; f. Park dedication as required. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Damax Consultants Ltd David Laird Owner: Ronald C Davis, Margit Davis Legal Description: Lot: 4, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: 24650 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential 1103 Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Designation Urban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Park Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Conservation West: Use: Currently Single Family Residential with greenhouses; Proposed use is Single Family Residential Zone: Currently RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential); Proposed zone is R-1(Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: 1.533 HA (3.79 acres) Access: 236 Street, 112 Avenue, and Creekside Street Servicing: Full Urban Companion Applications: SD/104/07 b) Project Description: Application RZ/104/07 proposes to rezone the property located at 11224 236 Street from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential). This application is in support of subdivision application SD/104/07, which is for a 29 lot subdivision. The proposed size of each lot is not less than 299.1 m2. The east portion of the subject property will be dedicated as park for the protection of Horseshoe Creek. Road dedication will be provided along 236 Street and on the east side of the property to connect Creekside Street. It has been determined that the portion of 112 Avenue that runs along the south side of the property will not be constructed due to geotechnical concerns. Therefore, the applicant is making an offer to the District for its purchase. The applicant will need to finalize their purchasing agreement as a condition of the zoning. As the site has been known for its geotechnical concerns, the applicant has submitted a geotechnical report, which states that "the lands may be used safely for its intended purposes". -2- c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject property is designated Urban Residential and Creekside Street is identified as a major corridor. According to the zoning matrix, this designation supports the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone. The following Official Community Plan Residential Infill and Compatibility Criteria apply to the proposed rezoning: 3-20 Major Corridor Residential Infill developments must be designed to be compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood and will be evaluated against the following criteria: a) building forms such as single detached dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhouses, apartments, and small lot intensive residential development subject to Policy 3-21 b) maximum building height of two and one-half storeys with an emphasis on ground oriented units for all developments except for apartments. The proposed R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone has a maximum height of 9.75 metres and 2 storey in height. The proposal will also be subject to an Intensive Residential Development Permit to ensure a vibrant street presence. c) a maximum height of four storeys for apartments This is not applicable as the proposal is for single family lots. d) adherence to Development Permit Guidelines for multi -family and intensive residential development as outlined in Chapter 8 of the Official Community Plan. The proposal will be subject to an intensive residential development permit and will be review against these guidelines. 3-21 All Neighbourhood and Major Corridor Residential infill development will respect and reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of established neighbourhoods, with particular attention to: (a) the ability of the existing infrastructure to support the new development The proposed lots will be serviced by municipal services. (b) the compatibility of the site design, setbacks and lot configuration with the existing pattern of development in the area. -3- The proposal is consistent with the pattern of development to the north. The properties to the north and south are both zoned R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District). (c) the compatibility between building massing and the type of dwelling units in the proposed development and the surrounding residential properties. The building massing and type of dwellings will be similar to the properties to the north and south as they are also zoned R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District). (d) the location, orientation, and visual impact of vehicle access/egress in relation to: i. adjacent developments ii. the street iii. the pedestrian environment Proposed lots 17-29 will have rear lane access and lots and proposed lots 1-16 will have access off of a municipal road. The applicant will be required to plant street trees and will submit a conceptual landscape plan as part of the intensive residential development permit to help minimize the visual impact of vehicle access/egress. (e) Minimizing adverse parking and traffic impacts on the existing neighbourhood Each proposed lot will be required to provide two off-street parking spaces. (f) A gradual transition of scale and density through the design of building mass and form, such as: i. Reduction in building heights at the edges of a development, ii. Location of lower density components towards the perimeters of a site; and iii. Concentration of density to the centre of a development or towards a non-residential boundary The proposed subdivision is consistent with the density in the surrounding neighbourhood. (g) retention and preservation of significant trees, other natural vegetation, and environmental features. The east portion of the property will be dedicated as park to ensure the protection of Horseshoe Creek. (h) maintaining adequate light, view and privacy for residents on adjacent properties or in adjacent neighbourhoods; The proposed subdivision is for single family dwellings; therefore, there should be minimal impacts on light, view, and privacy. M! (i) Conservation of special landscapes such as gardens, or built -form features, including heritage buildings, that contribute to the unique character of the neighbourhood. This is not applicable as there are no special landscapes or built -form features. Zoning Bylaw: The proposed 29 lot subdivision layout is compatible with the surrounding area. Under Development Variance Permit file VP/058/03, a variance was granted to the three lots to the north of the subject property (Lots 14, 15, and 16) to reduce the minimum lot depth of the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone from 27 metres to 24 metres. Therefore, this proposal will require a similar variance to continue the pattern of development that was previously approved. The variance will reduce the lot depths of proposed lots 1-12 and 14-16. The minimum lot depth of the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone is 27 metres. Proposed lots 1-12 will have a lot depth of approximately 24 metres, proposed lot 14 will have a lot depth of approximately 26 metres, and proposed lots 15 and 16 will have a lot depth of approximately 25 metres. All other proposed lots comply with the minimum lot width, lot depth, and lot area requirements of the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone. Develo ment Permits: As the proposed zone for the property is R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), the development will be subject to an Intensive Residential Development Permit. The purpose of which is to provide a greater emphasis on high standards in aesthetics and quality of the building environment while protecting important qualities of the natural environment. Horseshoe Creek is located to the east of the property and its tributaries run into the east portion of the property; therefore, the property is subject to a Watercourse Protection Development Permit. Dedication of the east portion will be required to protect this watercourse. Development Information Meeting: A development information meeting was held at Kanaka Creek Elementary School on June 11, 2008 from 5:15 pm to 6:45 pm. Approximately 8 people attended the meeting. The concerns were as follows: • No playground • Increased traffic • Removal of trees In response to the concerns, the applicant had the following responses: -5- • Kanaka Elementary School has playground facilities and is less than a 5 minute walk away. • Creekside Street will be developed as part of the subdivision and should help to alleviate traffic along 236 Street. • The existing trees on 236 Street are on the road right-of-way and would have to be removed when the road is widened. In addition, the majority of trees are located on the east portion of the property that will be dedicated as park. Some tree removal will be required on the subject property for the construction of Creekside Street. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has reviewed the application and has provided the following comments: 1. The application information shows a subdivision with seven lots having driveways to 236 Street. This section of road is on a hill and a curve. It is suggested that a Traffic Engineer provide recommendation as to whether there should be driveways as shown. The applicant has provided a traffic study indicating that given the proposal `low -volume residential driveways the sight distaces are adequate." 2. The information provided by the applicant indicates that there are significant geotechnical concerns at this site. The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report which states "the land may be used safely for its intended purpose". 3. At the subdivision stage, the road at Gilker Hill and 236 Street will have to be constructed in accordance with a geotechnical engineer's recommendations; those recommendations must consider past slippage of the road in this area. 4. At the subdivision stage Latecomer Charges might apply under Latecomer Agreement LC 108/05 for a storm sewer at 112 Avenue. 5. Dedication of the 20 metre right-of-way for Creekside Street and 236 Street dedication (3.0 metres) are required at this stage. e) Environmental Implications: Horseshoe Creek is located to the east of the subject property and its tributaries run into the east portion of the site. Therefore, the property is subject to a Watercourse Protection Development Permit. The east portion of the property will be dedicated as park to protect this watercourse. -6- ��i�LL�1��Li1�F The proposed R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone conforms to the land use designation in the Official Community Plan. It is therefore recommended that application RZ/104/07 be favourably considered and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6599-2008 (Appendix B) be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Pre red -by -,'Adina,LeUA Plan ing Technician Approv b . Jan Ick"i j P, MCIP Goof Planning Approved by: Fe:public Quinn, MBA, P.Eng G Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. L.,r Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AL/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6599-2008 Appendix C - Proposed Subdivision Layout -7- Pcl. 'A' 1 4 5 E.7 11355 11348 11347 11342 11336 B_ 11337 11332 2 3 6 113 AAVE. H1114 BAVE. M�2 211261111251 11237 PARK BCP 26244 LMP 43730 PARK y PARK o LMP 36163 Y W W Q � BCP 17100 PARK 4 JORem P 24650 R22i 112 AVE. BCP 21397 11195 11 10 11147 9 n 1117E BCP 17360 " 8 N 11171 A 22 21 20 B 12 53 m 7 23 �S ^1 11163 e N o 24M1 N �T 11155 w w Rem w N 1114g 111 AAVE. It a 26 o BCP 26118 [] t1i35 m ^ o 12 11125 27 15NN14 13N82`�11��3�4P m 5� PARK 2 7 8 9 1❑11 1 N ro^ m NAM KANAKA WAY qT. 3 41 5 F21 pqtle.. F;D ^ �m u. Appeno/4A Rem.A LMP 47845 Rem G RP 1387 W2�1 11224-236St 0 .N e ! CORPORATION OF i o THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT c DATE: Dec 10, 2007 RZ/104/07 BY: JV River APPeo+tx B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6599-2008 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6599-2008." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 4 Except: Part Subdivided By Plan 41673; Section 16 Township 12 Plan 24650 New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1433 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the MAYOR day of , A.D. 200. CORPORATE OFFICER ❑Vr �an1r — — tiu ] a 10 11� hl tip 1 14 1129 h ry h H 15 15 112 235s2 B AVE. 7 ry s�6 � 3 h �- 6 4 a � h 2 11267 1 BCP 399 11251 1" 22 39988 2.827 ho 113 A AVE. 15 113f6 h ti 14 1 ry 13 -+ h 12 16 17306 BCP 2 984 71296 Mp 3 163 1 "3 N b 4 h e 5 N 11290 2 PARK BCP 26244 713f 11 10 11 1126 u � LMP 43730 1 v LMP 36165 PARK _ 112 B AVE. A 112 —if fZ6 M ❑ Q �y ry 7 ry ry ry1fl 12 �'n 6ry 8 9 11 PARK LMP 33? 163 _11261 o LMP 36163 1 2 3 4P 5 160 7 8 9 1J25 W 010 71255 c�i BCP 17100 ry h ry h h h cvt l 17 4 PARK 112 A AVE. v12 I72� 16 �15 f 1 4 1317p* N I� o ^ H o Rem Rem 4 c�.r 'N1 I I N P 24650 0 I � 1.533 ha m 112, I IN RP 13 I I� ry 1Q 11224 LMP 26964 BCP 20491 112 AVE. I BCP 21397 1179 / / 27 11 10 1118 jf 0.801 ha rn 9 BCP 261 19— / BCP 33224 N 28 BCP 17360 I N g BCP 26120 36 I BCP T g 4 1 J 17 1.048 ha 0 0 A 21 BC 728 3 7 �; BCP 33 2 Wl 23753 1.24 ho 24 23'a 1 7 1 1.41 m 6 1776 w — " 29 h I h JJ15 o00 w pVE. n,Rem 2 „ 111� 12855 BCP i T l A AVE. 21398 30 `P cL c1 2 BCP 26118 12 3'^ 2711f2 15 1 4PARK 32n!MC, P y CP 12 53 O1 2 3 ,,,� 8 h h � 4j 5h 6n 7a $� N 341jf 9 W 1ro he Eel e2 `7 1 w h h '.1 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6599-2008 Map No. 1433 From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) To: R-3(Special Amenity Residential District) A 1 1 !2500 Apfend;,y a \ \ I / § / \ \ % .. /\ \�\ . n2a �\\ \\\ \\� 5\\ act:,«- �� \`- \ MAPLE RIDGE 9rI ish Wumhia I to]; FROM: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer DATE: August 8, 2008 FILE NO: RZ/037/07 ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6507-2007 12110 206 ST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential), to permit the development of a 13 unit townhouse complex. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Bylaw No. 6507-2007 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. i) Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; ii) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; iii) Road dedication as required; iv) Removal of the existing buildings; v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: 0782773 BC LTD. Ron Antalek 0782773 B C LTD Lot: 22, D.L.: 241, Plan: 29188 Urban Residential 1104 Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses North: Northeast: South East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RM-1(Townhouse Residential) Single Family Residential RS-1 Urban Residential Townhouses R M-1 Urban Residential and Conservation Terasen Utility Station and Single Family Residential RS-1 Urban Residential Single Family Residential R-1 Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-1 and P-1 Urban Residential and Institutional Single Family Residential Townhouses 0.427 HA (1.055 acres) 206 Street Full Urban DP/037/07 Application RZ/037/07 proposes to rezone the property located at 12110 206 Street from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). This application is in support of a 13 unit townhouse development. Although a linear development such as this is problematic, there is a Terasen Gas right-of-way over the south portion of the property, which limits the development potential of the subject property. As such, the applicant has made efforts to ensure that the unit closest to the west is oriented towards the street to enhance the street presence and to give a single family home effect. Landscaping has also been provided to ensure that privacy is maintained for adjacent properties; however, trees cannot be placed on the south portion due to the Terasen Gas right-of-way. If townhouses are proposed further north, townhouses will be expected to be orientated towards the street and will not be developed in this linear form. -2- c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject property is designated Urban Residential and 206 Street is identified as a major corridor. According to the zoning matrix, this designation supports the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone. The following Official Community Plan Residential Infill and Compatibility Criteria apply to the proposed rezoning: (a) building forms such as single detached dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhouses, apartments, and small lot intensive residential development subject to Policy 3-21 (b) maximum building height of two and one-half storeys with an emphasis on ground oriented units for all developments except for apartments. The proposed RM-1 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone has a maximum height of 10.5 metres and 2.5 storeys. The applicant has provided calculations to show that the proposal will meet the height requirements. The proposal will also be subject to a Multi - Family Residential Development Permit to ensure a vibrant street presence. (c) a maximum height of four storeys for apartments This is not applicable as the proposal is for single family lots. (d) adherence to Development Permit Guidelines for multi -family and intensive residential development as outlined in Chapter 8 of the Official Community Plan. The proposal is subject to a multi -family development permit and will be reviewed against the guidelines. 3-21 All Neighbourhood and Major Corridor Residential infill development will respect and reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of established neighbourhoods, with particular attention to: (a) the ability of the existing infrastructure to support the new development The proposed lots will be serviced by municipal services. (b) the compatibility of the site design, setbacks and lot configuration with the existing pattern of development in the area. The proposal meets the setback requirements of the proposed zone and no variances have been requested. There are townhouses to the northeast of the site, a higher density single family development to the east, and a school to the west. The subject property also fronts a major corridor; therefore, the development is considered compatible. (c) the compatibility between building massing and the type of dwelling units in the proposed development and the surrounding residential properties. The west side of the proposed development will appear as a single family development to ensure compatibility with the existing surrounding uses. (d) the location, orientation, and visual impact of vehicle access/egress in relation to: i. adjacent developments ii. the street iii. the pedestrian environment The visual impact of vehicle access/egress will be minimized with the use of landscaping. (e) Minimizing adverse parking and traffic impacts on the existing neighbourhood Each proposed unit will provide two off-street parking spaces. In addition, 10 visitor parking spaces will be provided although only 3 are required. (f) A gradual transition of scale and density through the design of building mass and form, such as: i. Reduction in building heights at the edges of a development, ii. Location of lower density components towards the perimeters of a site; and iii. Concentration of density to the centre of a development or towards a non-residential boundary The proposed development meets the height requirements of the zone. The unit front 206 Street has been designed to look like a single family dwelling, so that it will be more compatible with the surrounding single family dwellings. (g) retention and preservation of significant trees, other natural vegetation, and environmental features. Existing trees along the north side of the property will be retained and trees and other planting will be introduced around the perimeter of the subject property to enhance privacy. (h) maintaining adequate light, view and privacy for residents on adjacent properties or in adjacent neighbourhoods; The proposed development includes planting of trees around the perimeter where possible to enhance the privacy of adjacent properties -4- (i) Conservation of special landscapes such as gardens, or built -form features, including heritage buildings, that contribute to the unique character of the neighbourhood. This is not applicable as there are no special landscapes or built -form features. Zoning Bylaw: The proposed townhouse development complies with the setback and height requirements of the RM-1(Townhouse Residential) zone. No variances have been requested. Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: The proposed townhouse development complies with the parking requirement of the bylaw. In order to alleviate concerns regarding parking, the applicant has provided 7 additional on -site parking spaces for residents and visitors. Development Permits: The property will be subject to a Multi -Family Development Permit. The purpose of the Multi -Family Development Permit is to enhance existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs and minimize potential conflicts on neighbouring land uses. Currently, there is an existing home located on the subject property which is in poor shape. The introduction of this new development could enhance the existing neighbourhood. The applicant has designed the development, so that it gives a single family appearance from the street. The proposed townhouses will meet the diverse needs of prospective residents by introducing a new housing style in the area, which is close to schools. The applicant has also made efforts in terms of landscaping to ensure that privacy is enhanced. Advisory Design Panel: The applicant presented their proposal to the Advisory Design Panel on September 11, 2007. The resolution was as follows: That the Advisory Design Panel recommend revisions to the proposal be submitted back to the Advisory Design Panel for approval to address the following. a) Variation in site planning to achieve improvement to landscaping to the north b) Parking and interior street environment c) Create visual interest d) Increase contrast in material and finished to accentuate the articulation of the fagade The applicant made revisions to their plans, which were submitted to the Advisory Design Panel on October 30, 2007. The following comments were received: ISO • The stepping of the central block is good • The removal of the eastern most unit is also good The original design required variances to allow for one more unit, however, Planning Department did not support these variances. Therefore, one unit was removed from the proposal. • The tonal variation in the new colour scheme is better • Gas compound would be visible from the living quarters in building one and probably building three. The applicant has added trees and planting to the north side of the Terasen Gas Utility Station; however, could not add trees to the east of it due to the restrictions of the right-of-way. • There should be planting located at the east end of the property to help mitigate adjacency issues Trees and planting are proposed along the east side of the property as shown on the landscape plan. • Planting in front of the units can provide shade, reduce runoff, and offer a better scale The applicant has added trees and planting to the front of the units. • The elevations appear to need a second fagade treatment (or theme) other than just projecting balconies and soffits. The applicant has added a stone finish at the lower level of all the units and a shingle faQade to some of the projecting features. Development Information Meeting: A development information meeting was held at Westview Secondary School on January 16, 2008 at 7:30 pm. Approximately 17 people attended the meeting. There were some attendees who supported the development and some attendees who did not support the development. Those that supported the development provided the following comments: • With everyone going "Green", this project is across the street from schools, one block to transportation, and 3 blocks to shopping; • In the current OCP higher density for housing was proposed for this Residential Corridor Street. The need for higher densification in all communities is apparent to encourage transit; • Increased density will increase the supply of affordable housing; • Population in the schools will keep the schools a viable part of our community; -6- • Mature trees on the property will be saved where it is feasible; • A great opportunity for young families; Those that did not support the development had the following concerns: • Privacy • Property value • Parking issues • Traffic and noise d) Interdepartmental Implications: En_ineerin Department: The Engineering Department has reviewed the application and has provided the following comments: 1) The east side of 206 Street will need to be constructed to a collector standard width from the north property line of the site to the mid -point of Lot A, Plan RP16568. The existing road structure needs to be examined to determine if it meets current standards; if not, the road must be re -built to at least the centre line. 2) Any road or side improvements that are identified as need in a Traffic Engineer review is required. 3) The applicant should provide a Traffic Engineer review of the proposal to consider adequacy of the road system and pedestrian system and intersection operation and pedestrian/traffic conflicts. The applicant has received a letter from Floris van Weelderen, P.Eng with MMM Group stating the following. We find that a traffic review is not warranted for your development as there are only 13 units proposed, therefore the traffic generated will be minimal. In fact, it is our experience that the variance in weekday traffic volume will be greater than the amount of traffic likely to be generated from this development. Consequently, the changes in traffic associated with this proposed residential development would be well within the normal range of current volume levels and would generally be imperceptible to residents." 4) A sanitary sewer main extension is required along 206 Street, from the existing main near Dewdney Trunk Road. 5) Site drainage and road drainage to a storm sewer system is required. There is no municipal storm sewer system on 206 Street in this area. Any system that is proposed or built by this applicant will be part of an area service system and will not be a piece -meal system that only provides for this site. 6) The applicant would need to provide any system upgrading for the water system to provide adequate fire flow. -7- 7) 2.4 metres of road dedication is required across the site frontage. 8) There is a Terasen Gas high pressure natural gas main and right-of-way on the property. The applicant will have to deal with Terasen Gas for approvals of any activity on the right- of-way. 9) At the Building Permit stage all utility company service connections must be underground. X11al UR411LA The proposed RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone conforms to the land use designation in the Official Community Plan. It is therefore recommended that application RZ/032/07 be favourably considered and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6507-2007 (Appendix B) be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Prepared by.-- Adina LAng Planning Technician Appro b . neRi , MCP, MCIP for of Planning a - Approved byl Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & elopment Services Concurrence: J. (Jim) Rule ief Administrative Officer AL/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6507-2007 Appendix C - Site Plan Appendix D - Building Elevation Plans Appendix E - Landscape Plans IIE:� �.ppe►,d;x A 14 c n N N N m ry P4 N 25 12237 12229 L1 T $ n R P 1750 23 27 P 1 7 15 LMP 124 P 11392 A 12208 MP 578 P 26461 7 12209 12210 17 1 16 15 18 u~i 12194 n 12203 12206 $ IL 14 N 19 17 12198 ` 12200 12180 n 20 P 54677 t3 12194 n 18 12193 21 46 12 12182 12188 12179 22 a 11 12170 P 26481 P 72978 12169 12158 23 79 NWS 2686 10 12150 32 12157 12U8 24 12209 9 SUBJECT PROPERTY 12145 12138 1213425 8 12131 26 7 12122 21 1g G 12119 27 12124 't 29 28 P 27 g 12114 P 29188 t J 30 Ng �m0 ^ 12111 m ro fb 26 r 28 1v co 27 28 29 2 3 4 5 34 22 s ydg� '' 0 5 1209e 4 12113 12110 25 d 3 i7 29 31 O,P ib 19 t n Rs$ n $ n $ N n N 0 A 20835 20695 $ $ �`+ 12088 0. 35 16 4- 12075 1 120 a AVE. E8 6 1 12066 12091 Rem 23 n 12067 d 2 ry m 12052 12081 N N 1204D R 7 7 2 36 12074 3 N N 19 20 21 22 23 24 12075 120M r 8 tzo73 [:� 12055 H P 7 3 a m 12038 48 12085 Rem 24 4 r 12051 m 12o5z 18 15 14 m 12070 13 w 1202U 2 a 12025 J g 12088 P 29781 D_ 5 c S 77 �, N N a 11 P 12045 12048 (5 12 c' Z d 12010 1 1 12031 12o1z10 2 2 0ggi 16 12058 1 12041 3 2�'1T 120AAVE. 11 0) a- 49 P 29781 6 tzo37 zDe7s " 2 y Rem 26 12030 6 ,q, `�{r��10 c 12040 1zo3a 7 5 m 7n� N 12019 P 30456 8 12029 12024 n - 4 7 9 H 1 Rem 29 12025 8 1— 12025 KRem Rem 41 12030 9 3 0 12MO 12010 12ots ao P 70 71 rn 1 0 Cl) O 2 30 P 954 31 32 33 2 N 1 2 r rn lzoto n a f (L o 0- 12013 12001 ti N1 N N N N N a BCP 17822 DEWDNEV TRUNK ROAD FP54395 1 N 1 District of Pitt Meadows 12110 206 STREET .0 i° • H OF - * CORPORATION THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE N District ofMb { I PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley '� SCALE 1:2,500 DATE: May 4, 2007 FILE: RZ/037/07 BY: PC � River CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6507-2007 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6507-2007." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 22, District Lot 241, Group 1, New Westminster Plan 29188 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1406 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RM-1(Townhouse Residential) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER 578 1 4 ha. P 54677 46 2.725 ha. 12209 27 28 29 2 3 4 5 34 h � N 12113 M ti. ry ry ry h O — D------ _ 35 h S 6 1 12055 I 12097 'n o 12052 l2040 a 7 7 (01 36 g J � 8 120T� 12030 3 & i a �72038J 48 72065 �7 \ \ R 1 72020 g26 7S 120701 720j1 72012 ay J Ln ry a 49 II \ �36 Rem \ \ 72079 RP 8184 J \ \ 1 3887 Any I Rem 41 �`36, \ r+) 7y I N 6) \ EI Ln 2 "} r .) d �o co e_ 12013 P 11392 A ��zfa P 26461 C57267 '� 16 Q209 722 ~ 12194 16 / / N15 12203 12 a14 v 17 l 12199 ¢ 122 12180 13 � 72f 18 \ p 12793 � J2 121 72766 � � � 12179 P \ P 72978 11 a 12169 121 127. 12150 19461 NWS 2686 10 e \ \ 32 72757 121 20 \ 1.780 ha. 7 12138 P 29188 HIOX 1 7 21 929 a 0 12119 72724 1 8 N N �� 26 ray I n 721611 P 29188 00 ti20 6� 72110 22 ��, 2�8� n� v 4 0) 5 r+ 0.425 ha. _ _ _ 31 0� 0 25 e_ 3 A RW 18394 \ o I — 205 i 20695 N a ¢Q 1 1 120 6 AVE. EP 72979 w r7z067 EP 72979 Rem 23 a 2 rl- 1 O S5 12067 w O O 12074 u ---`_— —_ 3 19 20 21 22 23 24 12075 RP 1 ^72055 7 9 8 Rem 24 �12a51 m 1205218 15 14 13 co CO 72068 P 29781 5 0 �� 720 17 w N 1 N P 7 O3872045 206551612p677 ��3 2 N 1 l c r o 1 t2047 m r Zcq 720P K) 120 A AVE. 76A W 29781 n Rem 26 8 1z037 72033 d W 720306 �a 2 cn 12040 7 0.615 h a n 0429 — — W 12024 9 e 9 12025 120217 7 8 ry` 72025 72030 `y 1b 0 12010 bi I20 6 P 70271 `Q /,0J N 1 P 954 2 N 1 2 �`� � v) \ 30 31 32 33 12070r �cQ/ o J 0.421 hc. L_ MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6507-2007 Map No. 1406 From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) ME rW- 1 NTS Appendik C b86z g�w M y� �C a n s e ak bg U a ■■e� W _D yp W W t J 2 OCK gYc w Z g W N D— (n � N N g f Q O W } OFF Eli W ~ ry O > a Y M a p 8 o� §§ ..-.. •-.- S 1 rr y y �y" I � � I i Eg e I 1 U • I I Y I I I I � 1 1 f 1 1 Le 4 oxi�r�sav ri � M f!`Cfl e. eti z G g LU LU b BBp m 9y lu Z o Z O H Oz 133'S 1S Pi90Z �Pfe„ d;x .0 I I I I I I I I I I I I Hq'i - � �\ j\ j ��(\\ J } 1■I��IFifi�l PAU �� >Fi • 1��: 4�. . � All: 'E�*�' Ilill711 _ N fl!IN i. 1�HIM �` 1 3 3 8 1 S H1 9 0 Z o $ fq J CL AGE �s 9 p� p x q g 3 �41 �7 iS RP o � 44 1 �O ?�a �u - ®aF o R W e U M - a i MAPLE RIDGE 9MIsh Columbia DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 01, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: DP/070/08 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Development Permit 22229 BROWN AVENUE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant seeks to renew an earlier approved Development Permit 009/05 to construct a three - phased seniors apartment development (Sunridge Manor) consisting of three, 4-storey apartment buildings on 22229 Brown Avenue. This 269 unit development proposed in three phases, is intended to provide for independent living, supportive living and an on -site care facility. This application is subject to Multi -Family Development Permit Guidelines as outlined in the 2006 Official Community Plan. This application is identical to the earlier approved but expired application. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/070/08 respecting property located at 22229 Brown Avenue. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Efficient Management Group Ltd Daniel Chiu Owner: BSHS Enterprises (Canada) Co Legal Description: Lot: G, D.L.: 399, Plan: 10689 OCP: Existing: Residential Proposed: Residential Zoning: Existing: RM-3 (High Density Apartment) Proposed: CD- 1-00 (Comprehensive District) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Multi -family Apartments Zone: Land Use Contract Designation RES 1105 South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West. Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Previous Applications: b) Project Description: Government Building/Shopping Centre RM-3 (High Density Apartment), P-6 (Civic Institutional), & C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Residential,hlstitutional, Town Centre Commercial Single Family Dwelling RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Residential Multi -family Apartments and Single Family Dwelling Land Use Contract and RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Residential Vacant Senior Apartments/Congregate Care Facility 1.194 HA (2.95 acres) Brown Avenue / 222 Street Full Urban RZ/018/94, SD/008/94, VP/005/94, DP/009/05 The subject site is 2.95 acres (11,943 mz) and located on Brown Avenue (Appendix A). Site access is off of Brown Avenue and a public road Right -of -Way off of 222"d Street, with a private driveway connecting the two streets. The developer intends to construct a phased development for three 4- storey buildings. Phases I and H are each designed for 104 units and Phase III is designed for 61 units, for a total of 269 units. Although the development is "phased", it is anticipated that the construction of each building will be consecutive and fully completed within a year from the commencement of construction. The building designs have some craftsman elements, with cross -gable rooflines, shingle roofs, and wooden accents. The buildings have ample windows and the facades are clad with hardy - plank and brick. Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The 2006 Official Community Plan designates the subject site for residential use and the proposed development would be subject to the Multi -Family Development Permit Guidelines. Multi -Family Development Permit Guidelines: • New development into established areas should respect private spaces, and incorporate local neighbourhood elements in building form, height, architectural features and massing. The three buildings proposed in this phased project are all residential in character. The building massing, form and modulations have been planned to create a residential scale suitable to the site and to the neighbours in particular. The height is limited to four storeys with a flat roof to minimize impact on neighbours. However, mansard and gabled roof forms are used to reinforce the residential character of the buildings and to enhance the roof and fagade interface. The selection of fagade treatment like brick, horizontal siding, side wall shake and shingle roofing have been chosen to reflect the type of materials that are used in the residential surroundings. MR • Transitional development should be used to bridge areas of low and high densities, through means such as stepped building heights, or low rise ground oriented housing located to the periphery of a higher density developments. The proposed floor space ratio of 1.22 is well within the floor space ratio allowed in the CD- 1-00 zone (which is 1.8). All three buildings are proposed to be four storeys high in order to maintain continuity and achieve density that will make the project financially viable. Most of the existing development along 223`d Street on the east is all zoned RS-1 which is single family residential. Buffering between the two uses will consist of perimeter fencing and trees and a 7.5 meter setback from the apartment to the property line. • Large scale developments should be clustered and given architectural separation to foster a sense of community, and improve visual attractiveness. The three buildings are separated and designed to break monotony. The landscaped areas in between encourage social interactions, provide a multi -functional open space and improve visual attractiveness in addition to creating a balance between built and unbuilt areas. • Pedestrian circulation should be encouraged with attractive streetscapes attained through landscaping, architectural details, appropriate lighting and by directing parking underground where possible or away from public view through screened parking structures or surface parking located to the rear of the property. All resident parking and staff parking is provided underground with an intension of encouraging pedestrian activity on ground. Visitor parking is provided adjacent to the entrances to the three buildings. Architectural details like significant entrance canopies provide a welcoming feature to all buildings. The landscaped areas in front of the two L-shaped buildings with Daybreak Cherry and Antarctic Beech trees provide a focal point of interest at the entrance. Although Brown Avenue will serve as the principal access to the subject site and is planned as its main entrance, considerable thought has been given to the interface between pedestrian, automotive and service vehicular traffic. A single road acts as the interconnecting spine for the three phases. The proposed plan illustrates an easy circulation system with access circles to each of the building entrances and adjacent visitor parking and nearby screened service bays. Pedestrian sidewalks and paths provide access throughout the site and will be complimented by benches, trees and street lighting. Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan The subject site is located within the Town Centre area and designated on the Town Centre Concept Plan at a density exceeding 62+ units per hectare/25+ units per acre. The development proposal is for 91 units per acre. The proposed lot coverage totals 39.2%, which is well below the maximum lot coverage of 60% recommended in the Concept Plan. Buildings I and II are oriented inward towards the site's internal public space, whereas Building III is a long narrow building that runs adjacent to the internal roadway and has a front entryway facing Brown Avenue. All the buildings have many windows to provide sufficient "eyes on the street". Advisory Design Panel: -3- On July 12, 2005 the Advisory Design Panel reviewed the development proposal and was generally supportive. The new application was not reticulated to the ADP as the applicant addressed all the earlier comments from ADP. These comments were as follows: 1. Consideration be given to the proximity of the Phase II building north property line and the shadow that is being cast from it. 2. That some greening of the north south access routes be provided on the west side. 3. That garbage amenities and location be reviewed. The project architect has provided shadow drawings (Appendix B) showing the shadows cast by all of the buildings on a typical March 21' and September 2 1 " (being the two days of the year with the longest shadows). On these dates the shadow of the Phase H building at the north property line will be touching the edge of the building to the north of the site between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. The greatest impact will be on the L-shaped building directly to the north of the subject site. The other two buildings north of the subject site will be minimally impacted. Staff has worked with the project architect to ensure that the above are addressed. c) Intergovernmental Issues: The Planning Department received the certified copy of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 6350-2005 from the Ministry of Transportation on March 151, 2007 CONCLUSION: This application is a request to renew DP 009/05 that expired on June 19`h, 2008. The Development Permit was issued with the normal 1 year time restriction to ensure work proceeds in a timely manner. The project proceeded at a slower pace than anticipated by the applicant and now he wishes to proceed to Building Permit. The BP cannot be issued without a valid DP. The approval of this second identical DP will permit the project to proceed in a timely manner. Therefore, it is recommended that Development Permit No. 070/08 be approved for issuance. Prepared by: Chess R. 95ddard B.A.; t Maln r�f Development CP, MCIP la Approved by: rank QuinnNi P.En� G))%� Pub#0 VorkX& Development Services Concurrence: J. L (Jim) Rene Chi f Administrative Officer The following appeddices are attached hereto: Appendix A: Subject Map Appendix B: Architectural Plans Appendix C: Landscape Plans -4- - --- 15 5 12250 1 12 12256 12255 1z2sa F 12251 123 AVE. 12240 T 4 13 12238 o P 134 42 � 12241 a 56 C LIMP 1 241 13 A B 53 12228 3 W 14 12230 coa0 co 0 1zz31 N 57 N o A B P 51690 zz2o 2 15 N a LMS 1802 a p 12zio 58NN16 1 r1221 N N o 122 AVE. NWS 612 P 60017 Pcl. 1 NWS 1531 51 P 49482 P 57090 Pcl."A" NWS 1357 12151/73 �2170 1 CP 13 1z1a7 275 12 2 ° N 12139 0 274 11 3 1O 10 tzlzs a 4 273 Z 5 1z1z3 (P 9669J 6 7 8 9 272 1z11s 1212e t-- P 6997 H NWS 133 omo — O P O M IL ! c'N tr 12111 N N 121 AVE. •A• (P 38752) t2oss N N LIMP 12218 K L MIN N 1 P 16997 12075 a P16 7 j J I H G N N 12-1 F CHURCH AVE. A a 12MS LMP 8411 'r rn F C 4 w 12036 E12035 rl P 14898 ❑~1 3 C 12028 n_ P 669 ❑ 2 1 u1 Am Nn N +Jr41iYw LE:�II o District Langley River ruaron . A ppen4;x A 1227 1 LIMP 35292 Rem 1 LMS 3 21 12201 I 12191 r04 L !LO P 5IN Co 10 0 9i A LIMP 26249 P 18132 3 H I 44 48 Rem 3 lztsr P 41066 P 44211 m 2 m 1217o � 121 a 12159 � M a 1 t2154 P 8496 4 L 421R 12149 SUBJECT PROPERTY 14 12 28 12142 P 15022 12150 N � 1 12481 Rem N LMP 39518(1easl 75 11 n 23 29 1z15 P 1 889 � 12130 � 12135 12130 r12127 O In 22229 BROWN AVENUE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12, September, 1874 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,500 DATE: Feb 10, 2005 FILE: DP/009/05 BY: PC I rw;xvuoeuoo Trun�3u�uv f,t : a � : c e g S: i satior •s r�wwr�oeJ a � E i I t `+ 5 S� S i � i l z�Oa I . ' ... s � ■ B a9fill G `sass s �. 4 �n - 9� 949Y 4 sue-• _ -:e- _ ;_ B i�0;�_Ilk n v 8 tf b oil i 133211S PJEZZ <, � I I T T T ? t� N mom. IIrII � I�;I a C a` Le 133211S PUZZZ <j a_z!mr-,, �\ & ■4 ■t > �; ■m G a4 02 > ■y ■$ e ■_ �_ >,��■a a ■\ m= w I®1I®'� I®-1 000 I Los- 0 =�ma IIMNI or.�v L ;g 8: I fPand-X 0, =3 US PJ2ZZ I =3 JiS PuZZZ c j o :` xg I4` =11 n I 131� l 1.l G NIII 4 w �z w �a z 3 0 cr m Q ff �W e t co HN H rrrrrcrrrcrrrrrrcrrrrrrc�rr r �.. :=r . MAI Ili 11H iA G•�g�••�E Ps sogpfg9Y g4R3is . A.oE BinXa 6 'J �" w U z w ,- z w w V/ 0 w U z w w w w L MAPLE RIDGE $ritish Columbia DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 7, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: DP/055/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Development Permit 11919 Maple Meadows Way EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Commercial Development Permit has been received for property located at 11919 Maple Meadows Way. The applicant is proposing a car dealership, which is permitted under the CS-1 (Service Commercial) zone. The plans for the development are consistent with the policies of the Official Community Plan and comply with the provisions of the Zoning Bylaw and Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/055/07 respecting property located at 11919 Maple Meadows Way. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Ziaeddiam Miri Owner: 0785321 BC LTD Legal Description: Lot: B, D.L.: 222, Plan: BCP3423A OCP: Existing: General Commercial Zoning: Existing: CS-1 (Service Commercial) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Commercial Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial) Designation Commercial South: Use: Commercial Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial) Designation: Commercial East: Use: Commercial Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial) Designation: Commercial 1106 West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: District of Pitt Meadows District of Pitt Meadows District of Pitt Meadows Vacant Highway Commercial Use (Car Dealership) 0.296 ha (31860 sq.ft.) Maple Meadows Way Full Urban DP/054/07 The applicant is proposing to construct a car dealership located on the west side of Maple Meadows Way. There is a covenant area and statutory right-of-way located at the rear of the property. The covenant is for the protection of Katzie Slough and the statutory right-of-way is for municipal storm services. There is also an easement located at the front of the property for storm sewer. Therefore, the development site is limited to the areas outside of the covenant, statutory right-of-way, and easement areas. The subject site is within the floodplain. The applicant has submitted a hydrogeotechnical report which states that the "subject site may be safely used for its intended purpose". The report will be registered on the title of the subject property. The subject site is also subject to the Watercourse Protection Development Permit. The setbacks to Katzie Slough will be equivalent to the covenant area shown on the site plan and will be protected by the existing chain link fence. The applicant has met the requirements of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit, which is to be reviewed by the Director of Planning. c) Planning Analysis: Commercial Development Permit Area The purpose of a Commercial Development permit is to foster attractive commercial areas that is compatible with adjacent development and enhances the unique character of the community. The key concepts are as follows: 1. Avoid conflicts with adjacent uses through sound attenuation, appropriate lighting, landscaping, traffic calming and the transition of building massing to fit with adjacent development. • The existing development is surrounded by commercial uses. • Landscaping plans have been submitted and are supported by the Advisory Design Panel. -2- 2. Encourage a pedestrian scale through providing outdoor amenities, minimizing the visual impact of parking areas, creating landmarks and visual interest along street fronts. • The applicant has proposed trees and a decorative fence along the north, south, and west property to minimize the visual impact of the parking areas 3. Promote sustainable development with multimodal transportation circulation, and low impact building design. • The subject property is located close to public transportation. • The street trees create a more inviting area for pedestrian circulation 4. Respect the need for private areas in mixed use development and adjacent residential areas. • The surrounding uses are commercial, therefore there are no conflicts with any mixed use development or residential areas. 5. The form and treatment of new buildings should reflect the desired character and pattern of development and adjacent residential area by incorporating appropriate architectural styles, features, materials, proportions and building articulation. • The materials and colours have been supported by the Advisory Design Panel • The form and character is consistent with the surrounding commercial buildings d) Advisory Design Panel: The application was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel on October 9, 2007 and the resolution was as follows: That the Advisory Design Panel support the general concept with the following recommendations: a) Trees to wrap the perimeter b) Consideration of the material and finish of the surrounding perimeter fence c) Planting added to flank the front entry The applicant has met the recommendations of the Advisory Design Panel by including more trees around the perimeter of the property, the proposed fence will be treated, and planters have been added to the front entry of the building. e) Environmental Implications: Katzie Slough is located to the west of the subject property; therefore, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit is required. The watercourse is being protected with an existing covenant. -3- CONCLUSION: The proposed car dealership conforms to the Commercial Development Permit Area policies. It is therefore recommended that application DP/055/07 be favourably considered. Director of Planning A Approved by: rank Quinn, A, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Dev ent Services 9 , a Concurrence: J. L./Jim) Rule Chi f Administrative Officer AL/d p The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - subject map Appendix B - elevations Appendix C - site plan Appendix D - landscape -4- Avrend,x A 7 Rem 1 S 11sss LMP 31913 s SUBJECT PROPERTY �W Rem. Pcl.'ONE' BCP 3423A $7 LMP 37906 LOT B 11919 3 3 LMP 43275 8 3 LOT A LMP 31913 BRI-11 A P 70753 P 1144 100 11979 WEST ST. MAPLE LANE r w 1 qF'73513 h 1111511 m 8 9 10 2 0 0 0 N N 119A 9 1H 2 N 3H 4 733 P 8 667 ro t 1 1 2 o n 11900 H 0- d 11911 WESTST. BRUCE Rem Rem W 112 E 1/2 Rem 16 Rem 17 Rem 18 Of 15 of 15 P 111. a S N 1 N 2 N 3 N 4 N 5 n m F P 68232 0- 1 LMP e 7486 1 2 2 LMP 38773 11870 DUNN AVE. 3 `'0 11850 N 20115 n d 2011L 9 � Rem 10 11830 LMP 38773 10 nelo A P 11194 LOT 1 11 BCP 3872 11790 (COMMUTER RAIL STN.) 11919 MAPLE MEADOWS WAY iilL'Y1!!I.ia �a.FMCORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF L MAPLE RI[]GE MAPLE RIDGE SCALE 1 1 Distdct of s*; Langley + ..'� PLANNING DEPARTMENT , 1 1' 1 1 APpe-I)d,x .B 0 z 0 i Eu tir a o• I p linmv L 1. It r� ' mso is g R a ao _ H-1-N E Ej mm U� 3 �ygmim F3 f r3 E3aq aau vIU3 �— �I u 4. I Append ik 9el6LEdw� ue�d fl MAPLE RIDGE British Columhia DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Development Permit 21755 Lougheed Highway EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DATE: August 08, 2008 FILE NO: DP/075/08 ATTN: C of W A Development Permit application has been received for 21755 Lougheed Hwy. to regulate the form and character of the proposed service commercial development adjacent to properties designated in the Official Community Plan for residential use. The previous DP/010/05 was issued on June 181h 2007 and was valid for one year. The Development Permit has now expired and the applicant is seeking to renew the Development Permit with this application. This application and project is identical to the one approved by Council on October 10, 2006. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/075/08 respecting property located at 21755 Lougheed Hwy. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: 406326 B C Ltd. Owner: 406326 B C Ltd. Legal Description: Lot 319, Plan RP61812 and Lot 192, Plan 35428, D.L. 247, Gp. 1, NWD OCP: Commercial Zoning: CS-1 (Service Commercial) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation Single Family Residential (15 upnh) South: Use: Church Zone: P-4 (Church Institutional) Designation: Institutional 1107 East: Use: Zone: Designation West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Previous Applications: a) Project Description: Vacant RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Service Commercial Restaurant CS-1 (Service Commercial) Service Commercial Vacant Pub and Licensee Retail Store .106 Ha. (.25 Acres) Lougheed Highway Full Urban RZ/041/80, RZ/010/05 The applicant seeks the approval of DP/075/08 for 21755 Lougheed Highway to permit the construction of a new 160 patron neighbourhood bar & grill with associated cold wine and beer store. All off street parking is accommodated on the site and the adjoining motel site. b) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: This development is subject to the guidelines applicable to Section 8.5 Commercial Development Permit Area Guidelines of the Official Community Plan that aim to regulate the form and character of development located within commercial areas. This development respects the key guideline concepts as outlined in this section. 1. Avoid conflicts with adjacent uses through sound attenuation, appropriate lighting, landscaping, traffic calming and the transition of building massing to fit with adjacent development. There will not likely be any conflicts with the Best Western Hotel as that project will be integrated with this proposal by way of shared access and parking plans managed through common ownership of the lands and a parking and cross access agreements. A new solid wood fence will be placed along the north property line to buffer the residential homes to the north. This fence will be augmented with some existing vegetation and new planting that should act over time as a visual buffer to the rear of the new building. The building itself has been oriented in such a way that the lower bulk elevation faces the residential areas. Also the noisiest uses, such as the liquor store and second storey pub deck are facing Lougheed Highway and away from the residential uses. -2- 2. Encourage a pedestrian scale though providing outdoor amenities, minimizing the visual impact of parking area, creating landmarks and visual interest along street fronts Landscaping has been provided along Lougheed Highway and the landscape plan includes pockets of "green" in the parking area. The high standard of commercial architectural design and material selection for the project provides visual interest along the streetscape. 3. Promote sustainable development with multimodal transportation circulation, and low impact building design. Bicycle racks have been provided at the pub entrance. The site is also within easy walking distance of a large residential area and the Regional Town Centre. As the project is not within the Regional Town Centre and is essentially the same building as previously approved, no low impact design elements have been considered. 4. Respect the need for private area in mixed use development and adjacent residential areas. A new solid wood fence will be provided along the rear property line to screen the commercial area from the single family residential area located directly north of the subject site. The main customer areas and access points to the building and parking areas are located along the Lougheed highway frontage. A small secure landscaped area for employees is proposed in the rear yard setback. No windows or doors exist on the north building face that allows views from public areas north to the residential homes. Those few windows that do exist only allow light into private areas of the building such as kitchens and exit stairwells. c) Advisory Design Panel: At the June 13, 2006 meeting the Advisory Design Panel expressed overall support for the project as presented. The project was not resubmitted to the ADP as no changes have occurred from the earlier project proposal. d) Financial Implications: To insure that the development permit is complied with development permit performance security is required. The security is calculated as 2.5% of the construction value. The construction value of this project is estimated at $1,300,000.00. Therefore security in the amount of $32,500.00 will be collected as a condition of development permit approval. -3- CONCLUSION: As the development proposal complies with the commercial guidelines of the 2006 OCP for form and character, it is recommended that DP/075/08 be given favourable consideration as was done previously. ou Ek� - Prepared by: Chuck GoddarcUBA, MA Manager of Development and Environ ental Services A oved b . Ja P. erin , MCiP Direc lanning Approved by Frank Quinn, P.Eng., PMP GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer CG/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Site Plan Appendix C - Building Elevations Appendix D - Landscape Plan M 200 201 202 203 204 292 294 a- 11895 i P 136099 215 221 220 219 218 217 216 11885 LO_ � b 7 C 214 208 Cn a 296 P 352 = 11888 212 P 36099 t N 11884 211 210 117 r�& LO 213 11873 ^_ _ LO 118 N HOWISON AVE. 11863 119 v o N CD N SUBJECT PROPERTY c°'o I�C\j co co ^ 00 11851 N N N N N N N N N N a N _ LO LO 120 238 226 227 1 228 229 230 231 232 234 235 236 N 237 col P 360 9 11841 121 192 P 1204 11829 319 2 1 B 122 ❑ 0 P 61812 eo N T � LO LO LP 77304 CY) o 123 7 r-- m m o r` m r` r` r- rn r r` r- d N N N N N N N W LOUGHEED HWY. 00 C4 M o r- _ N I� V CD O O co 00 (.0 00 00 00 N N N N N N N � N N N Rem r A B 275 2 P 8409 *PP075 *PP066 189 7 "B" 1 2 3 7 11762 1176-. 276 ` 188 P 8950 11753 8 11750 P 6664 P 6664 1175 u7 277 17 . 187 ` �aa District of ) L Pitt Meadows ---j ; 21755 LOUGHEED HWY sdvY Vail — D I N N CORPORATION OF o _ THE DISTRICT OF N r A �� MAPLE RIDGE F District of 1• J PLANNING DEPARTMENT Wrigley 7 DATE: Aug 7, 2008 FILE: DP/075/08 BY: PC SCALE 1:1,500 !] J River NJIS3a ivHn13311H0t1`d NNW43031f m N W W Q U as rn u1 Y � u m cmi N W m U Q e W F u1 LL Oo O Z15- O g m wLL z I W �g W a mom Ow -tD N O Q N a[C a ¢N Q ri �iNw moc9NQ ,a v_Ni�m^ Fa a0 clim w0 mj�m2 N n _•- oo n �w XWFQ-W F-U � Vl In zNwa w rc�U c� M � v � l~i ' Oz� LL 0gn�—m'� Ie;,j m Cl. mr— OwNQ—mwa�Wp amQIQ �O p> N IIIN �mwwZH 50 zZmK¢WNOOOa N y a x a 0= o o a a m LL17_WOOp» = ofw w mma000pp a No Wic Y �� o!ww w C9 C9 ti a OO�Ozz N U (QJwOO�x �XO(7 Q� Wa'KK�I`iC� IQ- 69v�m¢¢w� ¢u Im, 9en .m, SYW 9WI LYw 6YW 6W/ eSW ILLY ZSM ESW YLIY SSW 99W taw 69W o9W 11 %Lla m 2/H 20 IE11 oEa 6a" eau LZe 924 azu KC In 22e RL oZd 6i11 c r o tit A .�� 43 11 22I 1I 421 ;I i 122I 22I i �w aw Yw 2flY EEW YFW SEW LEW BEN 6EW o/w IYW Z*w EWI WW 'LdI- I - IwI -ImI IeI -I.I. swu Iry IEW OflY 6Zw GZw LZW 9Zw SZw YZW EaW 221Y lRW 61W Sgj s1W j LAW 91W SIw Kw EIW ZIw IAW oIw 6w 9w jw 9w Yw EW Zw MEMEN ❑❑❑M ❑❑❑M NJIS30ivz:j113311HOI:JVNNVIN3431MWEIDEIN a? aEE FF ■NRON I— t!1 Q LL Q Z H Q Q J 3 W H Affel)C14 L) � F N91SM ivmn1o3mH3HV NNVW3031M '•E +,.: s ± m is iiL¢Fit3l! �4tf� I �4 E�SSidc• .mod@G It JIM 11 1HM HIS111111111 MMINA � 3 65 is 3 38 e� u� eg r �g =ME ilrl`I'I`I`I'I'I' ' DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 6, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: DVP/003/08 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Cow SUBJECT: Variance Permit 11580 Fir Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Development Variance Permit application has been received for property located at 11580 Fir Street. The variances requested are to the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw to reduce the required carriageway width of 7 metres to 6 metres and to not require concrete curb and sidewalk.. It is recommended that DVP/003/08 be approved. .1 LTA LTA 1:1i1117_11COW I That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/003/08 respecting property located at 11580 Fir Street. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Russ Franklin Enterprises Owner: Bruce W Fuller and Linda G Fuller Legal Description: Lot: 89, D.L.: 248, Plan: 35427 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation Urban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Lot Size: Previous Applications: Requested Variance: b) Project Description: Single Family Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 0.340 ha (0.840 acres) Fir Street Full Urban Not less than 0.108 ha (0.266 acres) SD/003/08 To reduce the required carriageway width of 7 metres to 6 metres and to not require concrete curb and sidewalk. The applicant is proposing a two lot subdivision under the existing RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone for property located at 11580 Fir Street. The subject property is located within the Fraser River Escarpment and the applicant has submitted a geotechnical report to ensure that the lands can be safely used for its intended purpose. The applicant requires a variance for the proposal to reduce the required carriageway width of 7 metres to 6 metres and to not require concrete curb and sidewalk. c) Planning Analysis: The Planning Department referred the subdivision application (SD/003/08) to the Engineering Department who provided the following comments: Fir Street does not have curb and sidewalk and a seven metre wide asphalt carriageway thus, a Development Variance Permit is required to support the subdivision with the present services. The variance permit will be to allow: six metres wide asphalt carriageway rather than seven metres, no concrete curb and no sidewalk. This is supportable as the rest of Fir Street is at this standard and other development along the street is considered unlikely. As the proposed road standard is consistent with road standard for the rest of Fir Street, this variance is supportable. WA CONCLUSION: The proposed road standard is consistent with the rest of Fir Street; therefore, it is recommended that Development Variance Permit DVP/003/08 be approved. Prepared by: Adina Leung Planning,Technician J'd1ne Pii ring, MCIP Direct ,of Planning Approved by. Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: L. (Jim) Rule 9h1ief Administrative Officer AL/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - subject map Appendix B - proposed subdivision layout -3- A J•-- 11681 15684 11663 11671 266 7 93 11666 N 11674 11657 0_ 11661 11664 O 6 94 M 265 11fi54 ,1ss31 11651 w a 95 2641164071 k62 5 11641 19/P 34338 4 1 F 307 2630P 692 }56`�11631Rem 2 0_3 3 2 cL ry tt62fi _ P 9387 m 2 a_ 49 N N s r A TQ 1+i6 50 ^ M o - rn c*� N m ao N A CV 1 211w w Ln +tsoa 331 SUBJECT PROPERTY N N N a OD N _ - - _ (P P 65523 d N ° 35 N N 4 2 3 0 CD N N 122 N 123 1 P 78165 d P �613i 90 2 11580 267 Cn E 3 w 11599 89 EP 13448 W 1 7510 P 35427 D Rem A 2 Rem 34 268 11593 11567 P 10272 11587 284 4 9 269 P 4469 P, 11544 11583 115g2 283 Rem 1 270 2 11656 P 10213 282 1Jm P 11611 `y 11577 �15co B 11547 271 P,5 Q� 281 52 Rem A 11569 A 11543 11530 272 ++510 280 "LMP 27079 11557 11531 273 1+5g2 11520 1 P 692 291 11543 11558 274 2 1155o . 20 l f � o 3 i o 0 292 co P 1�8�9 1 2 N 275 P 6020 d District of L ,* Pitt Meadows, f i 11580 FIR STREET 1 �'slw.r vax.y ;'^i r i ° CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF LgkgL_I - f MAPLE RIDGE Rlpjgq ti 1 ❑isirict Vt �/ I PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,000 Langley r DATE: Jun 26, 2008 FILE: VP/003/08 BY: PC SKETCH OF PROPOSED SUBOMSION ON LOT ss asmicr nor 248 GROUP i NEW WESIMINSIER DISTRICT PLAN 35427 123 1 124 �457 31 Plan 78165 122 plan .54 __�23 Pcl.'D' 0 1 8.95 VAnt W Ex Plan 1 J448 O� 1 V r-:- r i Area=231 W " 11au5e r i n za s�1] 89 plan 35427 �.� i m 21. &66 n 0.76 ri 6.18 _.1 tr M iG fA1438�� 1.79371 r' { Shed 4 C �4 57, LM C� n� O NO �j Note: House Location From Fenning Survey Area=1082m2 Rem.1 Plan 1021 J WADE ><.,<,<��.,r�� BC UM)AI SURVEYORS 604-46J-4753 Scale 1:500 Date:November 28, 2007 File:H94 app�,d;x 8 0 MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Variance Permit 22703 Dewdney Trunk Road 0:I xfllj 1111 l iTi LTi Gl;Y19 DATE: August 6, 2008 FILE NO: DVP/118/07 ATTN: Cow Development Variance Permit application DVP/118/07 has been received to vary the P-6 (Civic Institutional) zone setback requirement for the addition to Fire Hall No. 1. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit DVP/118/07 be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/118/07 respecting property located at 22703 Dewdney Trunk Road. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Ron Hoffart Owner: District Of Maple Ridge Legal Description: Lot: A, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: BCP34253 OCP: Existing: Institutional and Urban Residential Proposed: Institutional and Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: P-6 (Civic Institutional) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: P-6 (Civic Institutional) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation Urban Residential South: Use: Commercial Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial) & CD-5-88 (Comprehensive Development) Designation: Commercial 1109 East: Use: Zone: Designation West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Requested Variance: b) Project Description: Commercial and Single Family Residential CS-1 and RS-1 Commercial and Urban Residential Commercial C-3 and RS-1 Commercial Fire Hall Fire Hall 0.188 HA (0.464 acres) Dewdney Trunk Road, 227 Street, and proposed Brown Avenue Full Urban VP/118/07 A portion of the subject property was rezoned on July 8, 2007 to allow for the expansion of Fire Hall No. 1. As mentioned in the rezoning report, the additions to the Fire Hall will require various setback variances as described in the following section. c) Planning Analysis: The proposed addition will require a variance to reduce the required setbacks to the north, east, and west property line. The setback variance requested for the north property line is minor in nature and is for the corner of the lobby. The variance would be from 7.5 metres to 6.2 metres. The setback variance requested for the east property line is for the existing building and addition. The existing building is setback 0 metres from the east property line. The proposed addition aligns with the existing building; therefore, the requested variance would be from 7.5 metres to 0 metres. The setback variance for the west property line is for a portion of the existing building and the extension of the dayroom. The proposal reduces the encroachment of the existing building as a portion of the wall will be removed, but the proposal still requires a variance from 7.5 metres to 2.2 metres. -2- CONCLUSION: As the proposed variances are minor in nature or are consistent with the existing building, it is recommended that Development Variance Permit DVP/118/07 be approved. Pre red by: Ad' a Leuno PlanningTkhtician e P<kering, MOO MCIP 91 Approved by�rank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J.L (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AL/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A: Subject Map Appendix B: Site Plan -3- 291 12087 CV ti 292 294 a 12077 Rem N N 293 IC a-0,,091:1 � CD 300 10 N N N 299 12047 3 24 301 2 t 12074 2 12068 co - N P 7450 N N 70' 2 12060 1112081 N S 1 /2 C1112071 °- N 1 /2 �- 1212067 Aefend ix A = N U 12062 B a W J J Ll S 1/2 12054 12 12057 S 1/2 7 Rem. A 12042 �t N 1 /2 6 � 12038 0- S 1 /2 6 17 I 12032 12028 Rem. 0 /30 18 �1 16 co ti o � LO 15 a u) ti Cq N 12026 o- N P 6165 DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD N o N CO � N N N CD N N Rem. A N N N 'IT4 � � a � L,n � a P 9541 N N 1 N 00 LANE 7 — - I The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge 11971 u7 3 1970 makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy $9 N *PP084 or present status of the information shown on ,r— 11963 this map. B District of Pitt Meadows ---' , SI"rVa ; 22703 Dewdney Trunk Road ' y -- to CORPORATION OF - i o THE DISTRICT OF N _ ; - MAPLE RIDGE District of Langley Ala �W. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:1,204 �? DATE: Aug 6, 2008 FILE: Untitled BY: AL il]�JIS 2JIHOII�J il]�JiS HiLZZ 0 Q 0 ry z w z 0 w 0 District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: July 15, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: E08-015-1079 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer E01-052-001 ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 127/08 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A developer has subdivided land at 245B Street and 104 Avenue. Part of the subdivision servicing is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local Government Act. The extended servicing benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC 127/08 provides the municipality's assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or extended servicing to the benefiting lands. RECOMMENDATION: That with respect to the subdivision of lands involved in subdivision SD 34/07 located at 245B Street and 104 Avenue, be it resolved: 1. That the cost to provide the excess or extended services are, in whole or in part, excessive to the municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall be paid by the owners of the land being subdivided, and 2. That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or extended services on the parcels and in the amounts as set out in the staff report dated July 15, 2008; and further 3. That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 127/08 with the subdivider of the said lands. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The attached map identifies the lands which are involved in the subdivision and those which will benefit from the excess or extended services. The cost breakdown for each excess or extended service is shown on attached Schedule A. 1110 In addition, a copy of Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 127/08 is also attached for information purposes. b) Strategic Alignment: Administration of excess or extended services legislation complies with the Smart Managed Growth element of the Corporate Strategic Plan. The administration procedure supports the requirement for a developer to construct municipal infrastructure in support of land development and recognizes that the infrastructure may provide benefit to other land. c) Policy Implications: Part 26, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all or part of the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality shall determine the proportion of the cost of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and determine the proportion of the cost of the service to be attributed to parcels of land which the municipality considers will benefit from the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 127/08 will provide such determination for Subdivision SD 34/07. A developer has provided certain services in support of Subdivision SD 34/07. Some of the services benefit adjacent lands therefore, it is appropriate to impose Latecomer Charges on the benefitting lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 127/08 summarizes the municipality's determination of benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the term over which such Latecomer Charges will be applied. Prepared b . rry Fryer, Eng. anager f Corporate & Development Engineering Reviewed : A drew Wo d, PhD., PEng. /fA icip ngine e Approve by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J.L.�Jim) Rule Ch4f Administrative Officer Ijl/bc Schedule A TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE 1. ONSITE SERVICE FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF LOTS BENEFIT Storm Sewer in Walkway COST PER BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING SUBDIVISION 4 $29,740.00 $7,435.00 Lot 4, Plan NWP 72100, RN 84317-1400-4 1 x $7,435.00 2. EXTENDED NOMINAL SERVICE SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF COST PER BENEFIT LOTS BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING SUBDIVISION Storm Sewer 15 $57,120.00 $3,808.00 Lot 7, Plan NWP 72100, 245B Street RN 84317-1700-7 7 x $3,808.00 Lot 8, Plan NWP 72100, RN 84317-1800-8 7 x $3,808.00 Sanitary Sewer 18 $42,246.00 $2,347.00 Lot 7, Plan NWP 72100, 245B Street RN 84317-1700-7 7 x $2,347.00 Lot 8, Plan NWP 72100, RN 84317-1800-8 7 x $2,347.00 Page 1 3. EXTENDED OVERSIZE SERVICE SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF COST PER BENEFIT LOTS BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING SUBDIVISION Storm Sewer 3 $1,800.00 $600.00 Lot 7, Plan NWP 72100 245B Street RN 84317-1700-7 1 x $600.00 Lot 8, Plan NWP 72100, RN 84317-1800-8 1 x $600.00 Lot 9, Plan NWP 72100, RN 84317-1900-9 1 x $600.00 A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows: Lot 7, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 Lot 8, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 Lot 9, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 Lot 4, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 $ 43,685.00 $ 43,685.00 $ 600.00 $ 7,435.00 Page 2 10588 m BCP 2i --_-- - - - - - - -------- 105865 _---1 F RW r 1 9 10585 �' I 100 6 N BCP 29522 �� 5 I CD ICD 10592 8 I I 7 v P 75957 I I 10580 m 10583 10578 0570 p0 P71 �. 70579 � 7 6 S w B D I 55 .10570. . . . . . . . . . . . 10546 3098 10543 UO 6 CE 1036w 84 IIII. .. 25 10529 10530 ...-.-....'. I. � N F- w BENEEITTING 562 o BE.f� FITTING PROPERTIES PR.O �ERTY . . . . m . . . . . . �. . _J CD 3 .9 i 70469 II cl' P 18280 L.'�76' O 10455 P 72100 1 � 10445 10 U SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY BENEFITTING PROPERTIES CORPORATION OF THE N DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE G 12M AYE ENGINEERING 7� A� G DEPARTMENT DEWON Y TRUK RD- z EXCESS CAPACITY/EXTENDED _f SERVICES AGREEMENT 100 AVE. SCALE: LC 127/08 SD 34/07 `OL'c+rtEa 1i wr N.T.S. DATE: JULY 2008 FILE/DWG No LC 127-2008 EXCESS CAPACITY LATECOMER AGREEMENT LC 127/08 - SD 34/07 THIS AGREEMENT made the day of 2008: BETWEEN: James Rusell Isherwood 22723 Gilley Avenue Maple Ridge, BC V2X 2G1 Paul Amaral 2558 Jasmine court Coquitlam, BC V3E 2G5 (Hereinafter called the "Subdivider") AND: Joao Maria Da Costa 10150 264 Street Maple Ridge, BC V2W 1J9 Grazia Pacheco 16479 108B Avenue Surrey, BC V4N 5136 OF THE FIRST PART CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under the "Local Government Act", having its offices at 11995 Haney Place, in the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia (Hereinafter called the "Municipality") W1210y'�� OF THE SECOND PART A. The Subdivider has subdivided certain lands and premises located within the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more particularly known and described as: Lot 5 and 6, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 (Hereinafter called the "said lands") B. In order to facilitate the approval of the subdivision of the said lands, the Subdivider is required to construct and install the storm sewer and sanitary sewer services shown on the design prepared by ABM Engineering Services Ltd., Job No. C-1077 (Sheets 1 to 23), dated March 5, 2008, reviewed as noted March 17, 2008. Project No. E08-015-1079. (Hereinafter called the "Extended Services"); C. The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands and other than the said lands; Page 1 of 4 D. The Municipality considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive; E. The Subdivider has provided the Extended Services in the Amount of $130,906.00. F. The Municipality has determined that the following properties: Lot 4, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 Lot 7, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 Lot 8, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 Lot 9, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 (the "Benefitting Lands") will benefit from the Extended Services; G. The Municipality has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands connecting to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the "Latecomer Charge") on the Benefitting Lands in the following amounts: Lot 7, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 • $600.00 for any connection to, or the use of the storm sewer on 245B Street. • $3,808.00 per lot, to a maximum of $26,656.00, for use of the storm sewer on 245B Street. • $2,347.00 per lot, to a maximum of $16,429.00, for use of the sanitary sewer on 245B Street. Lot 8, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 • $600.00 for any connection to, or the use of the storm sewer on 245B Street. • $3,808.00 per lot, to a maximum of $26,656.00, for use of the storm sewer on 245B Street. • $2,347.00 per lot, to a maximum of $16,429.00, for use of the sanitary sewer on 245B Street. Lot 9, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 • $600.00 for any connection to, or the use of the storm sewer on 245B Street. Lot 4, Tp 12, Plan NWP 72100 • $7,435.00 for any connection to the storm sewer in the walkway along the north boundary of this lot 4. plus interest calculated annually from the date of completion of the Extended Services as certified by the General Manager - Public Works and Development Services of the Municipality (the "Completion Date") to the date of connection by the Benefitting Lands to the Extended Services; H. The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality shall pursuant to Section 939 (7) of the Municipal Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 be paid to the Subdivider as provided for in this Agreement. Page 2 of 4 NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 939 (9) of the Local Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 323, The parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality within fifteen (15) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to the Subdivider and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of June 30th and December 31st of the year in which the Latecomer Charge is collected by the Municipality. 2. This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer Charge by the Municipality to the Subdivider, or fifteen (15) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the Municipality shall be forever fully released and wholly discharged from any and all liability and obligations herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer Charge, and whether arising before or after the expiry of this Agreement. 3. The Subdivider represents and warrants to the Municipality that the Subdivider has not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from the owner of the Benefitting Lands for the provision, or expectation of the provision of the Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein; and further represents and warrants that he has not entered into any agreement with the owner of the Benefitting Lands for consideration in any way related to or connected directly or indirectly with the provision of the Extended Services. The representations and warranties of the Subdivider herein shall, notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Agreement, survive the expiry of this Agreement. 4. The Subdivider (if more than one corporate body or person) hereby agrees that the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in equal shares. 5. If the Subdivider is a sole corporate body or person, the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the following (name and address of director of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.): 6. In the event that the Subdivider is not the owner of the said lands, the owner shall hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto the Subdivider, his heirs and assigns, all rights, title and interest under this Agreement. Page 3 of 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective Corporate Seals, attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf, the day, and year first above written. James Rusell Isherwood - Subdivider Joao Maria Da Costa - Subdivider Paul Amaral - Subdivider The Corporate Seal of the CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE was hereunto affixed in the presence of: Corporate Officer - Authorized Signatory Grazia Pacheco- Subdivider Page 4 of 4 . , District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: July 15, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: E08-015-841 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer E01-052-001 ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 128/08 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A developer has subdivided land at 240 Street and Hawkins Avenue. Part of the subdivision servicing is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local Government Act. The extended servicing benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC 128/08 provides the municipality's assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or extended servicing to the benefiting lands. RECOMMENDATION: That with respect to the subdivision of lands involved in subdivision SD 83/03 located at 240 Street and Hawkins Avenue, be it resolved: 1. That the cost to provide the excess or extended services are, in whole or in part, excessive to the municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall be paid by the owners of the land being subdivided, and 2. That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or extended services on the parcels and in the amounts as set out in the staff report dated July 15, 2008; and further 3. That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 128/08 with the subdivider of the said lands. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The attached map identifies the lands which are involved in the subdivision and those which will benefit from the excess or extended services. The cost breakdown for each excess or extended service is shown on attached Schedule A. 19 In addition, a copy of Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 128/08 is also attached for information purposes. b) Strategic Alignment: Administration of excess or extended services legislation complies with the Smart Managed Growth element of the Corporate Strategic Plan. The administration procedure supports the requirement for a developer to construct municipal infrastructure in support of land development and recognizes that the infrastructure may provide benefit to other land. c) Policy Implications: Part 26, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all or part of the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality shall determine the proportion of the cost of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and determine the proportion of the cost of the service to be attributed to parcels of land which the municipality considers will benefit from the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 128/08 will provide such determination for Subdivision SD 83/03. CONCLUSION: A developer has provided certain services in support of Subdivision SD 83/03. Some of the services benefit adjacent lands therefore, it is appropriate to impose Latecomer Charges on the benefitting lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 128/08 summarizes the municipality's determination of benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the term over which such Latecomer Charges will be applied. Preparec�hi y%rTerryPEng. an Zrof MCorporate & Development Engineering Reviewed�y: ndrew Wood hD., PEng. Muni ' ine Approved bl Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J.L. (im) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Ij I/bc Schedule A TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE 1. ONSITE SERVICE FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF COST PER BENEFIT LOTS BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING SUBDIVISION Road 8 $56,656.00 $7,082.00 Lot B, Plan 19526 101A Avenue RN 84299-1600-3 1 x $7,082.00 Lot A, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1801-1 2 x $7,082.00 Lot 21, Plan 19526 RN 84299-2100-X 1 x $7,082.00 Road 7 $31,199.00 $4,457.00 Lot 13, Plan 19526 241 Street RN 84299-1300-2 1 x $4,457.00 Watermain 8 $21,280.00 $2,660.00 Lot B, Plan 19526 101A Avenue RN 84299-1600-3 1 x $2,660.00 Lot A, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1801-1 2 x $2,660.00 Lot 21, Plan 19526 RN 84299-2100-X 1 x $2,660.00 Water Connections 2 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 Lot B, Plan 19526 101A Avenue RN 84299-1600-3 1 x $2,500.00 Lot A, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1801-1 1 x $2,500.00 Watermain 7 $11,102.00 $1,586.00 Lot 13, Plan 19526 241 Street RN 84299-1300-2 1 x $1,586.00 Page 1 SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF COST PER BENEFIT LOTS BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING SUBDIVISION Sanitary Sewer 25 $40,000 $1,600.00 Lot 13, Plan 19526 101A Avenue & RN 84299-1300-2 SROW 1 x $1,600.00 Lot 14, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1400-6 1 x $1,600.00 Lot 15, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1500-X 1 x $1,600.00 Lot B, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1600-3 1 x $1,600.00 Lot A, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1801-1 2 x $1,600.00 Lot 21, Plan 19526 RN 84299-2100-X 1 x $1,600.00 Sanitary 2 $3,000.00 $1,500.00 Lot B, Plan 19526 Connections RN 84299-1600-3 101A Avenue 1 x $1,500.00 Lot A, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1801-1 1x $1,500.00 Storm Sewer 25 $56,125.00 $2,245.00 Lot 13, Plan 19526 101A Avenue & RN 84299-1300-2 SROW 1 x $2,245.00 Lot 14, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1400-6 1 x $2,245.00 Lot 15, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1500-X 1 x $2,245.00 Lot B, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1600-3 1 x $2,245.00 Lot A, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1801-1 2 x $2,245.00 Lot 21, Plan 19526 RN 84299-2100-X 1 x $2,245.00 Page 2 SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF COST PER LOTS BENEFIT LOT Storm Connections 101A Avenue 2 2. EXTENDED NOMINAL SERVICE $2,000.00 $1,000.00 BENEFIT ATTRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING SUBDIVISION Lot B, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1600-3 1 x $1,000.00 Lot A, Plan 19526 RN 84299-1801-1 1 x $1,000.00 SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF COST PER BENEFIT LOTS BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING SUBDIVISION Storm Sewer 57 $11,400.00 $200.00 Lot SE 198 ft G, Plan 240 Street 14240F RN 84172-0000-9 1 x $200.00 Lot Pcl H, Plan 22319F RN 84171-0000-3 1 x $200.00 A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows: Lot SE 198 ft adj Pcl G, DL 405, Plan NWP 14240F $ 200.00 Lot Pcl H, DL 405, Plan NWP 22319F $ 200.00 Lot 13, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 $ 9,888.00 Lot 14, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 $ 3,845.00 Lot 15, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 $ 3,845.00 Lot B, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 $ 18,587.00 Lot A, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 $ 32,174.00 Lot 21, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 $ 13,587.00 Page 3 N Zz F[8ac^[01!4 98oL�ZL fN+Lo] o 9lt r �� N co OWooB �Zf9l1i6ZZ 8tr o dO c�i rytYorn { Of W E" ccc S d'ltr47tZ ro 0° [8lLr�7zZ O z 133MS tll4l Z Wa E� : j O W laks L4l NIaLn o rn' iLO v °r"y to❑ �� to a s m Z a •¢ a SZ 38 W �^ MP O Ey W A 3 -Z LLJ• v S L Lfl Z O9 8L SLR W fx W F - Mom, ry� to sL� Z CeJ. ram• O O N*e m 9il0 W A N. � M] m I 00 f m. .0 1332115 1fltlNdtl = 11¢ I o ;901)v'z . L�j' L' n z MAW N f z to ZI*Z j tC) - Q MIA? . N IN�N O Zeikel;;�::� l09 d� CO Lr�z zlz N -12 L Z 38 to su*z € M 0', N 1 W I sn �ieq N Q ^ "7 /Y'� f[y ff7 a In q a $ N CQ OLOL%Z . d �lp� 0 4 I..LJ O o g f (L13D ¢�¢Z lfl 133MLS OZ N Q N w] w 7. m cl r0 4� Q nNi N O7 �o ao to $ cD o a� , *06 Z �90tZ of Z 9° to ua^ to P 5 O W Z O rn LL 8Z a � � aro m F- W � 0£06Z o oph rn`° m m w ❑ V Ln m n� �, X � t0 N o-, Ln Ocp � $ O W W 00 N � ❑ v ❑ o p S o w Q* rn m 133L11S tl0il Z L09Z d�8 z N } CC N _ Ca za�z Y O hn a= U Q Q 00 It lazrFlo- ❑ m N Oa � 00)oN �co Na LL 9V dw n Q U U to LLCRZdoe > N i co (A d- 0) N �t�tn c0 N mCL tro n r� c0 ❑ °° o a v N N W U `'� '` '4 a o o❑ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o U N o 0 0 ^ X I 1338LS OiL W I 9LtV L doe I Q r Z N . . . Z W ti rn Ld C9 N . N .LL LLJ Lj n, 2V. .00 Of a � . Z O 0- EXCESS CAPACITY LATECOMER AGREEMENT LC 128/08 - SD 83/03 THIS AGREEMENT made the day of , 2008: BETWEEN: Onni Development (240 Street) Corp 300 550 Robson Street, Vancouver, BC V613 2137 (Hereinafter called the "Subdivider") It ito OF THE FIRST PART CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under the "Local Government Act", having its offices at 11995 Haney Place, in the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia (Hereinafter called the "Municipality") WHEREAS: OF THE SECOND PART A. The Subdivider has subdivided certain lands and premises located within the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more particularly known and described as: Lot 5, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan 18630 NWD (Hereinafter called the "said lands") B. In order to facilitate the approval of the subdivision of the said lands, the Subdivider has constructed and installed the road, water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer services shown on the design prepared by CJ Anderson Civil Engineering Inc., Job No. 491 (Sheets 1 to 45), dated March 2007, reviewed as noted October 19, 2007. Project No. E08-015-841. (Hereinafter called the "Extended Services"); C. The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands and other than the said lands; D. The Municipality considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive; E. The Subdivider has provided the Extended Services in the Amount of $237,762.00. Page 1 of 4 F. The Municipality has determined that the following properties: Lot SE 198 ft adj Pcl G, DL 405, Plan NWP 14240F Lot Pcl H, DL 405, Plan NWP 22319F Lot 13, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 Lot 14, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 Lot 15, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 Lot B, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 Lot A, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 Lot 21, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 (the "Benefitting Lands") will benefit from the Extended Services; G. The Municipality has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands connecting to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the "Latecomer Charge") on the Benefitting Lands in the following amounts: Lot SE 198 ft adj Pcl G, DL 405, Plan NWP 14240F • $200.00 for connection to the storm sewer main on 240 Street. Lot Pcl H, DL 405, Plan NWP 22319F • $200.00 for connection to the storm sewer main on 240 Street. Lot 13, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 • 4,457.00 for direct access to the road on 241 Street, without extension of the road. • $1,586.00 for direct connection to the water main on 241 Street, without extension of the water main. • $1,600.00 for direct connection to the sanitary sewer main on 241 Street, without extension of the sewer main. • $2,245.00 for direct connection to the storm sewer main on 241 Street, without extension of the sewer main. Lot 14, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 • $1,600.00 for direct connection to the sanitary sewer main on 241 Street and the adjacent statutory right-of-way. • $2,245.00 for direct connection to the storm sewer main on 241 Street and the adjacent statutory right-of-way. Lot 15, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 • $1,600.00 for connection to the sanitary sewer main on the statutory right- of-way. • $2,245.00 for connection to the. storm sewer main on the statutory right-of- way. Lot B, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 • $7,082.00 for access to the road on 101A Avenue. • $2,660.00 for use of the water main on 101A Avenue. • $2,500.00 for use of the water service connection on 101A Avenue. • $1,600.00 for use of the sanitary sewer main on 101A Avenue or the statutory right-of-way. • $1,500.00 for use of the sanitary sewer service connection on 101A Avenue. • $2,245.00 for use of the storm sewer main on 101A Avenue or the statutory right-of-way. • $1,000 for use of the storm sewer service connection on 101A Avenue. Page 2 of 4 Lot A, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 • $7,082.00 per lot, to a maximum of $14,164.00, for direct access to the road on 101A Avenue. • $2,660.00 per lot, to a maximum of $5,320.00, for use of the water main on 101A Avenue, without extension of the water main. • $2,500.00 for use of the water service connection on 101A Avenue. • $1,600.00 per lot, to a maximum of $3,200.00, for use of the sanitary sewer main on 101A Avenue, without extension of the sewer main. • $1,500.00 for use of the sanitary sewer service connection on 101A Avenue. • $2,245.00 per lot, to a maximum of $4,490.00, for use of the storm sewer main on 101A Avenue, without extension of the sewer main. • $1,000.00 for use of the storm sewer service connection on 101A Avenue. Lot 21, Sec 3, Tp 12, Plan NWP 19526 • $7, 082.00 for direct access to the road on 101A Avenue. • $2,660.00 for direct connection to the water main on 101A Avenue • $1,600.00 for direct connection to the sanitary sewer main on 101A Avenue. • $2,245.00 for direct connection to the storm sewer main on 101A Avenue. plus interest calculated annually from the date of completion of the Extended Services as certified by the General Manager - Public Works and Development Services of the Municipality (the "Completion Date") to the date of connection by the Benefitting Lands to the Extended Services; H. The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality shall pursuant to Section 939 (7) of the Municipal Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 be paid to the Subdivider as provided for in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 939 (9) of the Local Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 323, The parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality within fifteen (15) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to the Subdivider and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of June 30th and December 31st of the year in which the Latecomer Charge is collected by the Municipality. 2. This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer Charge by the Municipality to the Subdivider, or fifteen (15) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the Municipality shall be forever fully released and wholly discharged from any and all liability and obligations herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer Charge, and whether arising before or after the expiry of this Agreement. 3. The Subdivider represents and warrants to the Municipality that the Subdivider has not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from the owner of the Benefitting Lands for the provision, or expectation of the provision of the Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein; and further represents and warrants that he has not entered into any agreement with the owner of the Benefitting Lands for consideration in any way related to or connected directly or indirectly with the provision of the Extended Services. The representations and warranties of the Page 3 of 4 Subdivider herein shall, notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Agreement, survive the expiry of this Agreement. 4. The Subdivider (if more than one corporate body or person) hereby agrees that the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in equal shares. 5. If the Subdivider is a sole corporate body or person, the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the following (name and address of director of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.): 6. In the event that the Subdivider is not the owner of the said lands, the owner shall hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto the Subdivider, his heirs and assigns, all rights, title and interest under this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective Corporate Seals, attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf, the day, and year first above written. The Corporate Seal of Onni Development (240 Street) Corp. was affixed in the presence of: Authorized Signatory - Subdivider Authorized Signatory - Subdivider The Corporate Seal of the CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE was hereunto affixed in the presence of: Corporate Officer - Authorized Signatory Page 4 of 4 - District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: August 7, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Terry Fox Run EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The committee for the Terry Fox Foundation is requesting permission to use municipal streets for the Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Terry Fox Run on Sunday, September 14, 2008. A map showing the run routes is attached. Authorization from Council is required in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By- law 3136-1982" to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge RECOMMENDATION: THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Terry Fox Run on Sunday, September 14, 2008, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule 'A' attached to the staff report dated August 7, 2008 are met. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability for injury or damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as Schedule 'A.' The Terry Fox Run will start and finish at Hammond Stadium. The run starts at 10:00 am and will consist of three venues: a 1 km, 5 km and a 10 km run. A map showing the routes is attached to Form 'A' along with the letter of request. Participants will be utilizing the road shoulders or sidewalks; and as such there will be no road closures. b) Strategic Plan: Permitting of Maple Ridge street events promotes community development and often highlights Maple Ridge's natural and built features. 1112 c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Permission to use municipal streets may cause some delays and inconveniences to other road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the event organizers. d) Interdepartmental Implications: The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as Coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service). e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. f) Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices. g) Alternatives: The District could refuse to permit the run to occur. In this event, the organizer would have to cancel the event. CONCLUSIONS: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events and activities. The Terry Fox Run was held in Maple Ridge last year without incident. Submitted by: Andrew Wood, PhD., PEng. Municipal Engineer Approved by: ank Quinn, MBA, PEng. GM: Public W rks &Development Services 11, Concurrence: J.L. 0im) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Aw/ml Schedule `A' To Council Memorandum Dated August 7. 2008 Terry Fox Run Condition of Approval Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers: I. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the R.C.M.P., and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District); 2. notify local Fire Department, and Ambulance Services of the event; 3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; 4. obtain any required permits from the District of Maple Ridge Parks and Leisure Services Department for park facility use; 5. make arrangements for all surrounding businesses and residents for access purposes during the event; 6. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date); 7. must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times. 8. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any way connected with the event; 9. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District." Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; and 10. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the District. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw permission to use municipal streets for this and future events should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements. Chief Administrative Officer th.e wr'y togs rug, Engineering Dept. District of Maple Ridge 11955 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, B C V2X 6A9 fjor cancer meareh July 281h.2008 The Maple Ridge -Pitt Meadows Terry Fox Run will be held on Sun, September 141h. 2008 . The Run starts at 10.00 a.m. and the route starts and finishes at Hammond Community Centre as in previous years. I am enclosing RCMP approval of the route, the Certificate of Insurance and a map of the route and we look forward to receiving approval from Council. Sincerely, /2 :-/�Z'Q Betty Levens 4122 22611 116th. Ave., Maple Ridge, B C V2X OW7 .wimp, terryfoxr n.org nsrS;� •svwc. FORM `A' 1 Details of the Event Date:: Contact Person:S"T7`t LLVEN., Phone Details: ' 1� I z �t<., Fa ►.0 n ..III _�_ izc�� a-c�r) c� . a e ;�7'�rv, h�.� /fir-, � ❑ C.� 5� v Fi • I:11•r7 s 64 r L a t 10, C7O..CI.__in Sketch of Traffic Control Plan: S C C ca / A z ko j n) a/) . RCMP concurrence for the proposed Traffic Control Plan The follovving agencies have been advised and acknowledg6'the event. - BC Transit ✓ Fire Department Ambulance Services Other attrscn Ave _ �a 92 C Y4i- ii'iUL Cr escenL _� Dols L7r T. {A, j F row, mil I 11 177 e Tet or 15 A. jnnish J, z, tart -y ggt.ra Icla i e 'a+ltc-KNIIl[7 AY Fes: � : Al Ave ~'r Perk: �'�ti� ►�.ti+SG �� yT. i 113 �`�dr� Fri �•,'�� . ��,�-��- «�,...... til � • 1 km •........... 5 /10 km Client Focused Risk Solutions CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE (A) THIS CERTIFICATE CONSTITUTES A STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AS OF THE DATE OF ISSUANCE AND ARE SO REPRESENTED AND WARRANTED ONLY TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER, OTHER PERSONS RELYING ON THIS MEMORANDUM DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES LISTED BELOW. INSURED The Terry Fox Foundation 46167 Yale Road, Suite 303 Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 2P2 Re: Evidence of Insurance -Terry Fox Run CERTIFICATE HOLDER - Name and Address District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Insurance as described herein has been arranged on behalf of the insured named herein under the following policy(ies) and as more fully described by the terms, conditions, exclusions and provisions contained in the said policy(ies) and any endorsements attached thereto. COVERAGE Commercial General Liability Including: Cross Liability Umbrella Liability INSURER POLICY NO. ING Insurance 1 501095221 ING Insurance 501113605 EXPIRY DATE COMBINED BODILY INJURY & PROPERTY DAMAGE October 31, 2008 $5,000,000 each occurrence October 31, 2008 S 10,000,000 excess of $5,000,000 Additional Insured and Cross Liability: It is hereby understood and agreed that the following are added as additional insureds but only with respect to the above and arising out of the Named Insured's Operations. The policy limits are not increased by the addition of such Additional Insured and remain as stated in this Certificate. Further, the policy shall apply to each Insured in the some manner and to the some extent as if a separate policy had been issued to each. Naming the Corporation as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the Corporation. Cancellation: Should any of the above described policies be changed, cancelled or amended restricting coverage before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will mail 30 (THIRTY) days written notice to the above named certificate holder. Broker: Purves Redmond Limited 390 Bay Street, Ste. 800 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y2 Authorized Representative: PURVES REQHI tM �ED PER Date: July 30 2008 Client Focused Risk Solutions CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE (B) THIS CERTIFICATE CONSTITUTES A STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AS OF THE DATE OF ISSUANCE AND ARE SO REPRESENTED AND WARRANTED ONLY TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER, OTHER PERSONS RELYING ON THIS MEMORANDUM DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES LISTED BELOW. INSURED The Terry Fox Foundation 46167 Yale Road, Suite 303 Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 2P2 Re: Evidence of Insurance -Terry Fox Run CERTIFICATE HOLDER - Name and Address District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Insurance as described herein has been arranged on behalf of the insured named herein under the following policy(ies) and as more fully described by the terms, conditions, exclusions and provisions contained in the said policy(ies) and any endorsements attached thereto. COVERAGE INSURER POLICY NO. EXPIRY DATE COMBINED BODILY INJURY & PROPERTY DAMAGE Commercial General Liability ING Insurance 501095221 October 31, 2008 $5,000,000 each occurrence f Including: Cross Liability Umbrella Liability ING Insurance 501113605 October 31, 2008 $10,000,000 excess of $5,000,000 Cancellation: Should any of the above described policies be changed, cancelled or amended restricting coverage before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will mail 30 (THIRTY) days written notice to the above named certificate holder. Broker: Purves Redmond Limited 390 Bay Street, Ste. 800 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y2 Authorized Representative: PURVES WD�Q�TE�D PER . Date: July 30 2008 District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Disbursements for the month ended July 31, 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: August 11, 2008 Council has authorized all voucher payments to be approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor, together with the Director of Finance. Council authorizes the vouchers for the following period through Council resolution. The disbursement summary for the past period is attached for your information. Expenditure details are available to any Council member for review in the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION: That the "disbursements as listed below for the month ended July 31, 2008 now be approved". GENERAL $25,594,465 PAYROLL $ 1,289,860 PURCHASE CARD $ 121,242 $.27.005,567 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan. b) Community Communications: The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial disbursements. 1131 c) Business Plan / Financial Implications: Highlights of larger items included in Financial Plan • Double M Excavating Ltd. - roadworks $ 281,519 • GV Water District water consumption Mar 26 - Apr 29/08 $ 332,701 • McEachern Harris & Brown - security refund $ 246,656 • The municipality acts as the collection agency for other levels of government or agencies. The following collections were remitted in July. 1. Albion Dyking District $ 107,795 2. BC Assessment Authority $ 825,049 3. City of Pitt Meadows $ 91,400 4. Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage $ 421,951 5. Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority $ 5,110,943 6. Provincial School Tax $15,024,276 7. Road 13 Dyking District $ 89,488 8. Tretheway Edge Dyking District $ 35,748 d) Policy Implications: Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice. CONCLUSIONS: The disbursements for the month ended July 31, 2008 have been reviewed and are in order. X, 2G Prepared by: G'Ann Rygg Accounting Clerk II y Approved by: Trevor Thompson, CGA Manager of Financial Planning L• Approved by: } Paul Gill, BBA, CGA GM - Corporate & Fi anc' I Services Concurrence J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer gmr CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - PERIOD 7, 2008 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNT A T & H Industries Inc Gravel & dump fees 52,625 Albion Dyking District 2008 collections 107,795 BC Assessment Authority 2008 requisition 825,049 BC Hydro Hydro charges July 73,979 BC SPCA Contract July 21,692 CUPE Local 622 Dues - pay periods 08/14 & 08/15 20,137 Centimark Ltd Roof maintenance: Firehall 538 Municipal Hall 355 Whonnock Lake Recreation Centre 52321 53,214 Chevron Canada Ltd Fuel 75,526 City Of Pitt Meadows Dyking District 2008 collections 91400 2008-2009 Ridge Meadows area ice time 43364 Firefighters mutual aid service 347 135,111 Day Advertising Group Inc. Recruitment 17,350 Double M Excavating Ltd Roadworks 132 Avenue 262641 Roadworks Balsam Street & Fern Crescent 18878 281,519 Fraser Health Authority Tax refund 45,289 Gr Vanc Sewerage & Drainage DCC collection Jan-Jun'08 421,951 Greater Vanc Transp Authority 2008 requisition 5,110,943 Greater Vanc Water District Water consumption Mar 26/08 - Apr 29/08 332,701 Green Cut Contracting Grass cutting 18,856 GTM Enviro Services Ltd Roadside mowing 18,109 Lidstone Young Anderson Professional fees June 19,590 Manulife Financial Employee benefits premiums 198,852 Maple Ridge Chrysler 1972 Ltd Security refund 60,000 Maple Ridge Historical Society Quarterly fee for service payment 23,503 Masaro, Cesira & Matteo Security refund 61,306 McEachern Harris & Brown Security refund 246,656 Medical Services Plan Employee medical & health premiums July 23,100 Minister Of Provincial Revenue School tax remittance 15,024,276 Municipal Pension Plan BC Pension remittance 257,066 Nag Construction Co Ltd Latecomer agreement payment 15,537 No 236 Seabright Holdings Ltd Latecomer agreement payment 17,726 Pitt Meadows Heritage & Museum Semi-annual fee for service 30,464 Professional Mechanical Ltd Maintenance: Firehall 826 Hammond Community Centre 237 Leisure Centre 8373 Library 210 Municipal Hall 2807 Pitt Meadows Family Rec Centre 2684 Randy Herman Building 6040 RCMP 1020 22,197 Receiver General For Canada Employer/Employee remit PP08/14 & 08/15 520,079 RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ice rental June 47,658 Ridge Meadow Comm Arts Council Art Centre grant July 36937 Program revenue May & Jun 2932 Theatre rental 1466 41,335 Ridge Meadows Seniors Society Quarterly operating grant Jul - Sep 40000 Defibrillator 966 40,966 Ridgemeadows Recycling Society Monthly contract for recycling July 74781 Weekly recycling 196 Litter pick-up contract 1848 Composters 2350 79,175 Road 13 Dyking District 2008 collections 89,488 Surrey Fire Service Terasen Gas Times Newspapers Tretheway Edge Dyking District Ultra -Tech Cleaning System Ltd Warrington PCI Management Winvan Paving Ltd Workers Compensation Board BC Disbursements In Excess $15,000 Disbursements Under $15,000 Total Payee Disbursements Payroll Purchase Cards - Payment TOTAL PERIOD 7 2008 DISBURSEMENTS 2008 Dispatch operating charges - Fire Dept. 67389 2008 Dispatch operating charges - Public works 10663 78,052 Natural gas July 16,307 2007 advertisements 28,514 2008 collections 35,748 Maintenance: Firehalls 1183 Library 5622 Municipal Hall 4169 Operations Centre 945 Randy Herman Building 4037 RCMP 4342 20,298 Advance for Tower common costs Jul 79000 Tower expenses Jun 5874 84,874 Roadwork projects 17,107 Employer/Employee remittance 2nd qtr 2008 99,563 PP 08/14 & 08/15 GMR Y:\Finance\Accounting\AP Remittances (Disbursements)\2008\[Monthly Council Report 2008.x1s]JUL'08 $24,811,283 $783,182 $25,594,465 $1,289,860 $121,242 $27,005,567