Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-01-28 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETI/VG AGENDA January 28, 2014 7.•00 p.m. Counci/ Chamber MEET/NG DECORUM Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be reprimanded. Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 MOMENT OFREFLECT/ON 300 /NTRODUCT/ON OFADD/T/ONAL AGENDA /TEMS 400 APPROI/AL OF THEAGENDA 500 ADOPT/ONAND RECE/PT OFM/NUTES 501 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of January 14, 2014 502 Minutes of the Public Hearing of December 10, 2013 and January 21, 2014 503 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of Januaryl0, 14(3) and 20, 2014 Page 1 Council MeetingAgenda January 28, 2014 Council Chamber Page 2 of 8 600 PRESENTA T/ONS A T THE REQUEST OF COUNC/L 700 DELEGA T/ONS 701 Canadian Pacific Railway • Mike LoVecchio, Director, Government Affairs 800 UNF/N/SHED BUS/NESS 900 CORRESPONDENCE 1000 BYLAWS �laws for Third Readin� Note: Item 1001 is from the Public Hearing of January 21, 2014 1001 2011-134-RZ, 24891-104th Avenue, 10480 & 10640 - 248th Street, 24860 -106th Avenue 1001.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6886-2011 To designate from conservation to medium density residential and to remove a conservation boundary Third reading 1001.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6887-2011 To rezone from RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) and from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and from R-1 (Residential District) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to adjust zoning boundaries that will permit the future development of 64 townhouses and 36 single family lots Third reading Council MeetingAgenda January 28, 2014 Council Chamber Page 3 of 8 Bvlaws for Final Readin� 1002 2011-084-RZ, 11185 240 Street and 11133 240 Street Staff report dated January 28, 2014 recommending final reading 1002.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6875-2011 To amend residential designations, to designate from Urban Residential, Conservation to Conservation and Urban Residential and from Commercial to Urban Residential and to amend the conservation area Final reading 1002.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6853-2011 To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RST (Street Townhouse Residential), R-1(Residential District), C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) and R-2 (Urban Residential District) to permit the future development of 24 street townhouses, a duplex, 38 single family lots and a mixed use commercial/residential development Final reading 1002.3 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6947-2012 To amend with the addition of legal descriptions in the correct sequence Final reading 1002.4 11185 240 Street Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7045-2013 To permit the District to enter into a housing agreement to allow for two rental dwelling units on the second storey of a proposed multi-use building Final reading 1003 2012-033-RZ, 24189 124 Avenue Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6912-2012 Staff report dated January 28, 2014 recommending final reading To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit future subdivision into two lots Final reading COMM/TTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDA T/ONS 1100 COMM/TTEE OF THE WHOLE 1100 Minutes - January 20, 2014 The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting. Council MeetingAgenda January 28, 2014 Council Chamber Page 4 of 8 Pub/ic Works and Deve%pment Services 1101 2013-101-RZ, 20758 Lougheed Highway, CS-1 to C-2 Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommendingthat Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7048-2013 to rezone from CS-1 (Service Commercial) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to construct a new building to house the relocated Mark's Work Wearhouse store be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule C and D of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1102 2013-113-RZ, 21530 Donovan Avenue, RS-1 to RS-1b Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7050-2013 to rezone from RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to allow for future subdivision into two lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1103 2013-115-RZ, 24440 128 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-2 Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommendingthat Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7052-2014 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit future subdivision into approximately seven single family lots be given first reading and the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1104 2012-038-RZ, 12116 and 12170 204B Street, P-2 to R-1 Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7044-2013 to designate land use from Institutional to Urban Residential be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6924-2012 to rezone from P-2 (Special Institutional) to R-1 (Residential District) to permit future subdivision into four residential lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing 1105 2013-102-CP, Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 7060-2014 Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 7060-2014 to make minor amendments to the Official Community Plan bylaw be given first, second and third readings. Council MeetingAgenda January 28, 2014 Council Chamber Page 5 of 8 1106 2012-021-DP, 11185 240 Street Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-021-DP to permit a two storey mixed-use commercial/residential project. 1107 2012-021-DVP, 11185 240 Street Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-021-DVP to vary building height, setbacks to 112 Avenue and 240 Street and parking for the residential component. 1108 2012-020-DP, 11185 240 Street and 11133 240 Street Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-020-DP to permit 24 street- oriented townhouses in 6 buildings, plus one duplex for a total of 26 dwellings. 1109 2012-020-DVP, 11185 240 Street and 11133 240 Street Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommendingthatthe Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-020-DVP to reduce front yard setbacks, widths of back yard space for end units and to apply urban road standards for the RST townhouses, to increase residential building heights for all R-2 lots and to apply the same setbacks and lot width requirements and allow vehicle access from the street rather than from the lane for R-2 lots that abut the lane common to the RST townhouses. 1110 2013-109-AL, 26520 112 Avenue, Application to Include Land into the Agricultural Land Reserve Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Application 2013- 109-AL be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission. 1111 Award of Contract, ITT-EN13-71: Storm Sewer Replacement on Donovan Avenue, 21500 Block Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommendingthat Contract ITT- EN13-71: Storm Sewer Replacement on Donovan Avenue, 21500 Block, be awarded to Strohmaier's Excavating Ltd. and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. Council MeetingAgenda January 28, 2014 Council Chamber Page 6 of 8 Financia/ and Corporate Services (including Fire and Po/ice� 1131 Disbursements for the month ended December 31, 2013 Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that the disbursements for the month ended December 31, 2013 be approved. 1132 Alternative Approval Process for City Classification Staff report dated January 20,2014 recommending that the alternative approval process to change classification of Maple Ridge from a District Municipality to a city be enacted. Communitv Deve%pment and Recreation Service 1151 Rescind Maple Ridge Policies 4.01, 4.03 and 4.11 Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Policies 4.01, 4.03 and 4.11 be rescinded. Correspondence 1171 Other Committee /ssues 1181 1200 STAFFREPORTS 1300 RELEASE OF/TEMS FROM CLOSED COUNC/L From the January 20, 2014 Closed Council Meeting: • Wharf Street Park Naming • Maple Ridge Social Planning Advisory Committee - Term Appointments 2013-2014 Council MeetingAgenda January 28, 2014 Council Chamber Page 7 of 8 1400 MA YOR'S REPORT 1500 COUNC/LLORS' REPORTS 1600 OTHER MA TTERS DEEMED EXPED/ENT 1700 NOT/CES OFMOT/ONAND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEET/NG 1701 Notice of Motion by Councillor Ashlie "That Council review Policy 3.07 Council Training, Conferences & Association Building" 1800 QUEST/ONS FROM THE PUBL/C Council MeetingAgenda January 28, 2014 Council Chamber Page 8 of 8 1900 ADJOURNMENT QUESTION PERIOD The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes. Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the information required to provide a complete and accurate response. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings, delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca. Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca. Checked by: Date: District of Maple Ridge COUNC/L MEET/NG January 14, 2014 The Minutes of the Municipal Council Meeting held on January 14, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular Municipal business. PRESENT Elected Officials Mayor E. Daykin Councillor C. Ashlie Councillor C. Bell Councillor J. Dueck Councillor A. Hogarth Councillor B. Masse Councillor M. Morden Appointed Staff J. Rule, Chief Administrative Officer K. Swift, General Manager of Community Development, Parks and Recreation Services P. Gill, General Manager Corporate and Financial Services F. Quinn, General Manager Public Works and Development Services C. Carter, Director of Planning C. Marlo, Manager of Legislative Services A. Gaunt, Confidential Secretary Note: These Minutes are also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca The meeting was filmed by Shaw Communications Inc. ��� 200 300 �•� CALL TO ORDER MOMENT OFREFLECT/ON /NTRODUCT/ON OFADD/T/ONAL AGENDA /TEMS Item 1601 Renovations for Integrated Forensic Identification Services APPROI/AL OF THEAGENDA The agenda was approved with the addition of Item 1601 501 Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 2 of 15 500 ADOPT/ONAND RECE/PT OFM/NUTES 501 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of December 10, 2013 R/2014-003 501 Minutes Regular Council It was moved and seconded That the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of December 10, 2013 be adopted as circulated CARRIED 502 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of January 2, 2014 R/2014- 502 Minutes Development Agmt It was moved and seconded Committee That the minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of January 2, 2014 be received. CARRIED 600 PRESENTA T/ONS A T THE REQUEST OF COUNC/L - N i I 700 DELEGA T/ONS - N i I 800 UNF/N/SHED BUS/NESS Note: Item 801 was forwarded from the January 6, 2014 Council Workshop Meeting 801 City Designation Staff report dated January 6, 2014 recommending that staff be authorized to initiate the legislative process to change the municipal designation of Maple Ridge from a District Municipality to a City and that approval of the electors be obtained through the alternative approval process. Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 3 of 15 R/2014-005 City Designation Initiate legislative process •�� 1000 It was moved and seconded That staff be authorized to initiate the legislative process to change the municipal designation of Maple Ridge from a District Municipality to a City; and That approval of the electors be obtained through the alternative approval process. CORRESPONDENCE - N i I BYLA WS �laws for Final Readin� CARRIED 1001 2012-077-RZ, 11935 207 Street Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6941-2012 Staff report dated January 14, 2014 recommending final reading To rezone from CD-3-87 (Service Commercial, Bank or Credit Union) and CS-1(Service Commercial) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to accommodate a new Langley Farm Market. Final reading R/2014-006 2012-077-RZ BL No. 6941-2012 Final reading It was moved and seconded That Bylaw No. 6941-2012 be adopted. CARRIED 1002 Maple Ridge 2014-2018 Financial Plan Bylaw No. 7043-2013 To establish the five year financial plan Final reading The General Manager of Corporate and Financial Services gave a presentation providing information on the financial plan bylaw and discussions throughout the year pertaining to District financial aspects. He Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 4 of 15 also provided information on possible future changes to the current financial plan. R/2014-007 BL No. 7043-2013 Final reading It was moved and seconded That Bylaw No. 7043-2013 be adopted. �.. _ . . �. Councillor Bell - OPPOSED COMM/TTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDA T/ONS 1100 COMM/TTEE OF THE WHOLE Minutes - January 6, 2014 R/2014-008 Minutes COW January 6, 2014 It was moved and seconded That the minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting of January 6, 2014 be received. CARRIED Pub/ic Works and Deve%pment Services 1101 2012-013-RZ, 24152 112 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-1b Staff report dated January 6, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7041-2013 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to permit future subdivision into 22 single family lots be given first reading, that comments be received from School District No. 42 prior to first and second readings of the required Official Community Plan amending bylaw and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879- 1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 5 of 15 R/2014-009 2012-013-RZ It was moved and seconded BL No. 7041-2013 First reading 1. In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvement district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies and in that regard it is recommended that consultation with the above groups has been considered, and it is deemed not necessary, with the exception that it is recommended that additional consultation with School District No. 42 be required in respect of this matter, in addition to the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. This consultation will be in the form of a referral of Bylaw No. 7041-2013 and accompanying materials; 2. Given that the stated position of School District No. 42 is not to purchase the subject property for a school site at this time, that Bylaw No. 7041-2013 be given first reading; 3. That comments from School District No. 42 be received prior to first and second reading of the required Official Community Plan amending bylaw; and Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 6 of 15 4. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. CARRIED Note: Councillor Bell excused herself from the discussion of Item 1102 at 7:42 p.m. as her child attends Meadowridge School. 1102 2013-105-RZ, 12162 240 Street, RS-3 to P-1 Staff report dated January 6, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7047-2013 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to P-1(Park and School) to facilitate the expansion of the existing Meadowridge School at 12224 240 Street be given first reading and the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision (lot line adjustment). R/2014-010 2013-106-RZ It was moved and seconded BL No. 7047-2013 First reading In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 7 of 15 and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; That Bylaw No. 7047-2013 be given first reading; and; That the applicant provides further information as described on Schedules A, C and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for a subdivision (lot line adjustment). CARRIED Note: Councillor Bell returned to the meeting at 7:46 p.m. 1103 RZ/078/10, 24211 113 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-1d Staff report dated January 6, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7049-2013 to adjust the area designated conservation around Seigel Creek be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6761-2010 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1d (One Family Urban [Half Acre] Residential) to permit future subdivision into seven single family lots be amended, be given second reading as amended and be forwarded to Public Hearing. R/2014-011 RZ/078/10 It was moved and seconded BL No. 7049-2013 First, second reading BL No. 6761-2010 Second reading Public Hearing 1. That Bylaw No. 7049-2013 be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Loca/ GovernmentAct, opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Bylaw No. 7049-2013 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw; Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 8 of 15 3. That Bylaw No. 7049-2013 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan 4. That it be confirmed that Bylaw No. 7049-2013 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 5. That Bylaw No. 6761-2010 be amended as identified in the staff report dated January 6, 2014, be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Amendment of Official Community Plan, Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan, Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan and Schedule "C"; iii. Road dedication as required; iv. Park dedication as required; v. Registration of a Habitat Protection Covenant as a Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office; vi. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; and vii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. CARRIED 1104 2011-084-RZ, 11185 240 Street, Housing Agreement Bylaw Staff report dated January 6, 2014 recommending that 11185 240 Street Housing Bylaw No. 7045-2013 to permit the District to enter into a housing agreement to allow for two rental dwelling units on the second storey of a proposed multi-use building be given first, second and third readings. Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 9 of 15 R/2014-012 2011-084-RZ BL No. 7045-2013 Three readings It was moved and seconded That Bylaw No. 7045-2013 be given first, second and third readings. CARRIED 1105 2011-099-RZ, 12122 and 12130 203 Street, RS-1 to R-1 and R-2 Staff report dated January 6, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6884-2011 to rezone from RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) and R-2 (Urban Residential District) to permit future subdivision into 16 lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. R/2014-013 2011-099-RZ BL No. 6884-2011 Second reading Public Hearing It was moved and seconded 1 2 That Bylaw No. 6884-2011 be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development. CARRIED 1106 RZ/028/10, 20623 and 20615 113 Avenue and 11312 206 Street, Final One Year Extension Staff report dated January 6, 2014 recommending that rezoning application RZ/028/10 to permit an apartment building with 36 units be granted a final one year extension. Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 10 of 15 R/2014-014 RZ/028/10 Final One Year Extension It was moved and seconded That pursuant to Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, a final one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/028/10 (property located at 20623 and 20615 113 Avenue, and 11312 206 Street) and that the following conditions be addressed prior to consideration of final reading: i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Registration of a Geotechnical Report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iii. Road dedication as required; iv. Consolidation of the development site; v. Removal of the existing buildings; vi. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking. CARRIED 1107 2012-077-DP, 11935 207 Street Staff report dated January 6, 2014 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-077-DP to permit construction of a new commercial retail buildingto accommodate a new Langley Farm Market at the corner of 207 Street and 119 Avenue. R/2014-015 2012-077-DP Sign and seal It was moved and seconded That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-077-DP respecting properties located at 11935 207 Street. CARRIED Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 11 of 15 1108 2012-080-SD, 5% Money in Lieu of Parkland Dedication, 12150 203 Street Staff report dated January 6, 2014 recommending that the owner of the subject property pay an amount that is not less than $96,500.00 R/2014-016 2012-080=SD Money in Lieu of Parkland Dedication It was moved and seconded That pursuant to Local Government Act, Section 941, regarding 5% Parkland Dedication or payment in lieu, be it resolved that the owner of land proposed for subdivision at 12150 203 Street, under application 2012-080-SD, shall pay to the District of Maple Ridge an amount that is not less than $96,500.00. CARRIED Financia/ and Corporate Services (including Fire and Po/ice� 1131 Disbursements for the month ended November 30, 2013 Staff report dated January 6, 2014 recommending that the disbursements for the month ended November 30, 2013 be approved. R/2014-017 Disbursements It was moved and seconded November 2013 That the disbursements as listed below for the month ended November 30, 2013 be approved: General Payrol I Purchase Card 1132 Adjustments to the 2013 Collector's Roll $ 9,701,750. $ 2,458,661. $ 102.267. $ 12,262,678. CARRIED Staff report dated January 6, 2014 submitting information on changes to the 2013 Collector's Roll through the issuance of Supplementary Roll 10. For information only No motion required Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 12 of 15 1133 2013 Council Expenses Staff report dated January 6, 2014 providing information on Council expenses to the end of November 2013. For information only No motion required Communitv Deve%pment and Recreation Service - N i I Correspondence - N i I Other Committee /ssues - N i I 1200 STAFFREPORTS- Nil 1300 RELEASE OF/TEMS FROM CLOSED COUNC/L Item 1300 is the announcement of the release of items: From the Closed Council Meeting of January 6, 2014 • Maple Ridge Agricultural Advisory Committee term appointments for 2014-2015 of lan Brooks, Georgina Rodriguez and AI Kozak For information only No motion required 1400 MA YOR'S REPORT Mayor Daykin attended the Caring Place Christmas Dinner. He encouraged residents to visit the art gallery to attend the Group of Nine art show. Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 13 of 15 1500 1601 COUNC/LLORS' REPORTS Councillor Dueck Councillor Dueck attended a Ridge Meadows Recycling Society meeting. Councillor Masse Councillor Masse attended meetings of the Maple Ridge Community Heritage Commission, the Maple Ridge Social Planning Advisory Committee and the North Fraser Post Secondary Education Task Force.. Councillor Morden Councillor Morden attended a meeting of the Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services Commission. He worked at the Christmas Haven dinner and also attended the memorial service for Dr. Marco Terwiel. Councillor Hogarth Councillor Hogarth attended a meeting of the North Fraser Post Secondary Education Task Force. Councillor Bell Councillor Bell attended a meeting of a Lower Mainland Local Government Association subcommittee. Councillor Ashlie Councillor Ashlie attended a meeting of the Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Social Planning Advisory Committee. She provided information on a survey through My Health My Community and encouraged residents to participate. OTHER MA TTERS DEEMED EXPED/ENT Renovations for Integrated Forensic Identification Services Staff report dated January 14, 2014 recommending that the contract for renovations to the RCMP Integrated Forensic Section located in the main RCMP building in Maple Ridge be awarded to Pax Construction and that the Corporate Office be authorized to execute the contract. R/2014-018 Award of Contract It was moved and seconded Pax Construction That a contract in the amount of $330,029.80, inclusive of taxes, for renovations to the RCMP Integrated Forensic Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 14 of 15 Section located in the main RCMP building in Maple Ridge, be awarded to Pax Construction, and further that a 20% contingency of $66,006 be established for any unanticipated scope changes and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract, noting that the District will be reimbursed for these costs by the RCMP Integrated Forensic Identification Services Unit. CARRIED 1700 NOT/CES OFMOT/ONAND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEET/NGS - N i I 1800 QUEST/ONS FROM THE PUBL/C Elizabeth Rosenau Ms. Rosenau expressed concern over fees for parking at the Ridge Meadows Hospital. She asked whether costs to maintain the parking lot have been determined, how much revenue is generated, how much money is transferred to Impark and wondered whether parking fees could be reduced to match other fees for parking in the municipality. Grover Telford Mr. Telford advised that he is heading a group named POP (Perturbed Over Pay Parking) to speak to concerns pertaining to parking fees at the Ridge Meadows Hospital. He asked what the actual parking fee policy of the Ministry of Health is and whether that policy is in line with other parking fees in the community. He asked Council to ascertain when the Impark contract expires and asked whether a bylaw can be developed to eliminate pay parking as done by Delta at their hospital. Mayor Daykin advised that Council does not have the ability to change pay parking fees at Ridge Meadows Hospital Graham Mowatt Mr. Mowatt asked whether it is possible to place information on My Health My Community into the local newspaper. He advised that Randy Kamp is hosting an open forum on prebudget speeches and encouraged residents to attend. Mr. Mowatt whether Council could spend more time and money explaining how the tax system is controlled by property assessments. Council Minutes January 14, 2014 Page 15 of 15 1900 ADJOURNMENT- 8:45 p.m. E. Daykin, Mayor Certified Correct C. Marlo, Corporate Officer District of Maple Ridge PUBL/C HEAR/NG December 10, 2013 The Minutes of the Public Hearing held in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia on December 10, 2013 at 6:00 p.m. PRESENT Elected Officials Appointed Staff Mayor E. Daykin J. Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Councillor C. Ashlie F. Quinn, General Manager of Public Works and Councillor C. Bell Development Councillor J. Dueck K. Swift, General Manager of Community Development, Councillor A. Hogarth Parks and Recreation Services Councillor B. Masse C. Marlo, Manager of Legislative Services Councillor M. Morden C. Carter, Director of Planning C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental Services A. Kopystynski, Planner II Mayor Daykin called the meeting to order. The Manager of Legislative Services explained the procedure and rules of order of the Public Hearing and advised that the bylaws will be considered further at the next Council Meeting on December 10, 2013. The Mayor then called upon the Manager of Development and Environmental Services to present the following items on the agenda: 1) 2011-122-RZ Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6880-2011 Legal Lot 10, Section 18, Township 15, New Westminster District, Plan 21387 Location: 11956 - 267 Street From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Purpose: To permit a future subdivision of 2 lots. 502 Public Hearing Minutes December 10, 2013 Page 2 of 4 The Manager of Legislative Services advised that no correspondence was received on this item. The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a power point presentation providing the following information: Application Information Subject Map Neighbourhood Context OCP Context Site Characteristics Subdivision Layout Terms and Conditions There being no comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with. 2) 2012-068-RZ Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6946-2012 Lega I: Location: From: To: Purpose: Parcel "A", District Lot 222, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan BCP30168 20370 Lougheed Highway CS-1(Service Commercial) C-2 (Community Commercial) To permit future subdivision into two lots and construction of a financial services use. The Manager of Legislative Services advised that correspondence opposing the application was received from Eric Phillips. The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a power point presentation providing the following information: Application Information Subject Map Neighbourhood Context OCP Context Site Characteristics Proposed Site Plan Elevations Public Hearing Minutes December 10, 2013 Page 3 of 4 • Landscape Plans • Terms and Conditions Eric Phillips Mr. Phillips is opposed to this application due to the impact on the neighbourhood in terms of an increase in parking and traffic problems and on safety improvements. Ron Moffat, Project Architect Mr. Moffat advised that the existing Royal Bank branch at 207t" Street and Lougheed Highway will be closed and that employees will be advised to park in accordance with the District bylaws. There being no further comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with. 3a) 2012-115-RZ Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7019-2013 Legal: Lot 303, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan NWP44882 and; Lots 4, 5& 6, all of Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan NWP8081 Location: 12018/12038 Edge St and 22554/22566 Brown Avenue Purpose: To Amend Schedule "B" the Official Community Plan as shown on Map No. 859 From: Low-Rise Apartment To: Town Centre Commercial. 3b) 2012-115-RZ Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6966-2013 Legal: Lot 303, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan NWP44882, and; Lots 4, 5& 6, all of Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan NWP8081 Location: 12018/12038 Edge Street and 22554/22566 Brown Avenue From: CS-1(Service Commercial) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: CD-1-13 (Comprehensive Development Zone) Public Hearing Minutes December 10, 2013 Page 4 of 4 Purpose: To create a CD-1-13 zone and to permit a phased three tower development of 240 apartment units with commercial on the bottom. The Manager of Legislative Services advised that no correspondence was received on this item. The Planner gave a power point presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject Map • Development Agreement Provisions • Neighbourhood Context • OCP Context • Proposed Site Plan • Project Details • Terms and Conditions There being no comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with. Having given all those persons whose interests were deemed affected by the matters contained herein a chance to be heard, the Mayor terminated the Public Hearing at 6:25 p.m. E. Daykin, Mayor Certified Correct C. Marlo, Corporate Officer District of Maple Ridge PUBL/C HEAR/NG January 21, 2014 The Minutes of the Public Hearing held in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia on January 21, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT Elected Officials Mayor E. Daykin Councillor C. Ashlie Councillor C. Bell Councillor J. Dueck Councillor A. Hogarth Councillor B. Masse Councillor M. Morden Appointed Staff J. Rule, Chief Administrative Officer C. Marlo, Manager of Legislative Services C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental Services Mayor Daykin called the meeting to order. The Manager of Legislative Services explained the procedure and rules of order of the Public Hearing and advised that the bylaws will be considered further at the next Council Meeting on January 28, 2014. The Mayor then called upon the Manager of Development and Environmental Services to present the following items on the agenda: 1a) 2011-134-RZ Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6886-2011 Lega I: Location: Purpose: From: To: Lot 1, Section 10, Township 12 BCP35626 Lots 42, 44 & 45, all of: Section 11, Township 12, BCP36341 24891- 104t" Avenue, 10480 & 10640 - 248t" Street, 24860 - 106th Avenue To amend the Schedules "B" and "C" of the Official Community Plan as shown on Map No's 824 and 825. Conservation Medium Density Residential (Map 824) and to Remove Conservation Boundary (Map 825) Public Hearing Minutes January 21, 2014 Page 2 of 3 1b) 2011-134-RZ Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6887-2011 _�: _�: Legal: Lot 1, Section 10, Township 12 BCP35626 Lots 42, 44 & 45, all of: Section 11, Township 12, BCP36341 Location: 24891- 104t" Avenue, 10480 & 10640 - 248t" Street, 24860 - 106th Avenue From: RM-1(Townhouse Residential) To: R-1 (Residential District) as shown From: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) To: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) From: R-1 (Residential District) To: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Purpose: To adjust zoning boundaries that will permit the future development of 64 townhouses and 36 single family lots. The Manager of Legislative Services advised that correspondence was received from Ruth and Norman Sigurdson and Bernice Rolls opposing the application. The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a power point presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Neighbourhood Context • OCP Context • Site Characteristics • Proposed Rezoning Plan • Proposed Site Plan for the townhouse site • Proposed design elements Allan Lees Mr. Lees spoke to the removal of conservation lands. He questioned why the developer wasn't aware of the rock outcropping sooner, what consideration was given for replacing lost Public Hearing Minutes January 21, 2014 Page 3 of 3 parkland, why the District would be paying for trees while the developer does not have to provide compensation for removing trees and how consultation on the application was determined. The Manager of Development and Environmental Services explained that the steep, dangerous slopes on the site required that the original plan to include a trail be changed to fence off the area. The conservation area does not include a watercourse and is not intended to be parkland. The property does not include many trees now due to its previous use for gravel extraction. The developer will be restoring trees on the site and the District will need to maintain the street trees that will be planted. Consultation was determined by Council earlier in the process. There being no further comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with. Having given all those persons whose interests were deemed affected by the matters contained herein a chance to be heard, the Mayor terminated the Public Hearing at 7:22 p.m. E. Daykin, Mayor Certified Correct C. Marlo, Corporate Officer CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES January 10, 2014 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. 2011-084RZ LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Catherine Schmidt, Recording Secretary Lots "C" and "D", District Lot 404, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan 19825 (to become: Lots 1 to 65, District Lot 404, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan EPP32520) 11133 � and 11185 240 Street Qualico Developments (Vancouver) Inc. Subdivision Servicing Agreement Statutory Right of Way (Sanitary Sewer and Drainage) No Build Covenant (Lot 62) No Build Covenant (Lot 44) Temporary Access Covenant (Lot 44) Temporary Turnaround Covenant (Lot 61) Soils Covenant (Lots 1 to 65) Housing Agreement Covenant (Lot 19) Residential and Visitor Parking Covenant (Lot 19) Geotechnical Covenant (Lots 1 to 65) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO 2011-084RZ. CARRIED ✓�Q - J.L�(Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer M mber N SCALE 12,500 � District of Langley 1 1 1 33/85 240 STREET CORPORATION OF ��� THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Nov 30, 2011 FILE: 2011-084-SD BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTS COMMITrEE MINUTES January 14, 2014 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. 2012-077-RZ LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Catherine Schmidt, Recording Secretary Lot B, District Lot 278, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan 76445 11935 207 Street 0934194 B.C. Ltd. Rezoning Servicing Agreement THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO 2012-077-RZ. CARRIED , , .� �..,,� ; �.�-�' J.L. (Jim) 1�ule, Chief Administrative Officer Membe� L 12019 41 1 rn � o�0 2 � o- �2ot3 N / � � 0 N Rem 1 9801 . '' �zoao 7 „��� P 30456 a 12029 Rem 29 izozs 12030 9 t2oto P 3 954 30 31 h 32 33 � N � � DEWDNEYTRUNK ROAD � 0 N 119AVE. A P 76445 P 87086 � � 0 N , LOUd:;HEED HWY ,. N � �-�� o � m � � 78869 N N N i � P 10201 803 ILMP 17�3 (LEASE PLAN) P 25311 �� � Scale: 1:2,000 :,it�l..qf P Meadow District of � `.°+�� Langley (�' : ��A�� (P 87086) 1 zoso 6 0 �'o �O@� � � � � 1ZOZ4 N N � �zozo � 8 9 tzoie � P 70 71 2 °� tzo�o � 1 2 12004 � � 1 N N � 0 1 `~ P 54395 P 69066 P 66 SUBJECT PROPERTY Rem 45 � 11955 a `�' 11910/50(98 P 76445 B 11935 � 119 AVE. T <o N 1- _ O � N 1 BCP 34169 a � 0 N 12025 c�1� a � J tzozo 119 A4E P 56403 P 8� 5 P 87 5 48 18 R � 16 1 � � 0 M Ol r n r �N N n O a m � N � � � i.�j O ' N OD �� � N p 1 N 35 36 i • � � •�'•�` • • � � • J � � . _. ,.,_ �� • � � � �- CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES January 14, 2014 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. AMERI-HEYDARI, Afshin LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Catherine Schmidt, Recording Secretary Lot 7, Section 11, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 49693 24937 109 Avenue Afshin Ameri-Heydari Secondary Suite (Section 219 Covenant) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO AFSHIN AMERI-HEYDARI. ::: � J.L. (Jim) Rule,�hiefAdministrative Officer Member N District of Langley 24937-109 St Scale: 1:1,000 � r�� � ^ c_ � DATE: Jan 14, 2014 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Building FILE: Untitled BY: JV CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITfEE MINUTES January 14, 2014 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. 2011-084RZ LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Catherine Schmidt, Recording Secretary Lots "C" and "D", both of: District Lot 404, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan 19825 11185 and 11133 240 Street Qualico Developments (Vancouver) Inc. Duplex Design Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO 2011-084RZ. CARRIED I J.L. (Ji Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Memb r N SCALE 1:2,500 District of Langley 1 1 1 33/85 240 STREET �t� CORPORATION OF --� _ � THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Nov 30, 2011 FILE: 2011-084-SD BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES January 20, 2014 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member Catherine Schmidt, Recording Secretary 1. GREATER VANCOUVER SEWERAGE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Lot 1, District Lot 280, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan BCP32752 20050 113B Avenue Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Release of Redundant Charges on Metro property where new pump station is located, as follows: Covenant - Charge No.T107061 Covenant - Charge No. U8672 Covenant - Charge No. AD207375 Covenant - Charge No. BJ303921 Covenant - Charge No. BL158389 Statutory Right of Way - No. U34009 Statutory Right of Way - No. W110854 Statutory Right of Way - No. No.W119793 Statutory Right of Way - No. W141736 Statutory Right of Way - No. Z138462 THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO THE GREATER VANCOUVER SEWERAGE AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT. � :Ca17:7i�17 J.L. (Jim) �`�le, Chief Administrative Officer Memberf N District of Langley 20050 113B AVENUE �, CORPORATION OF � � �`�� THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Scale: 1:2,000 � '���� �� �^ _ � DATE: Jan 20, 2014 FILE: Untitled BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 6886-2011 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "B" forming part of the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 6425 - 2006 as amended WHEREAS, Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "B" and "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6886-2011." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1, Section 10 and 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan BCP 35626; Lot 42 Section 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan BCP 36341; Lot 44 Section 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan BCP 36341; and Lot 45 Section 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan BCP 36341. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 824 and 825, copies of which are attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby redesignated to Medium Density Residential. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 825, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is to remove from Conservation and add to the Medium Density Residential designation. 3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 10th day of December 2013. READ a second time the 10t" day of December 2013. PUBLIC HEARING held the 21St day of January, 2014. READ a third time the day of , 20 . ADOPTED the day of , 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1001.1 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6886-2011 Map No. 824 From: Conservation To: � Medium Density Residential — — Urban Area Boundary N SCALE 1:4,000 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No Map No. Pu rpose: 6886-2011 825 � To Remove Conservation from Schedule C — — Urban Area Boundary N SCALE 1:4,000 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 6887-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. 2 3 This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6887-2011." Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1, Section 10 and 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan BCP 35626; Lot 42 Section 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan BCP 36341; Lot 44 Section 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan BCP 36341; and Lot 45 Section 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan BCP 36341. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1554 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R-1(Residential District) and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 10t" day of January, 2012. READ a second time the 10th day of December, 2013. PUBLIC HEARING held the 21St day of January, 2014. READ a third time the day of ADOPTED the PRESIDING MEMBER day of , 20 . , 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER 1001.2 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6887-2011 Map No. 1554 From: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential), A-2 (Upland Agricultural) To: � R-1 (Residential District) � RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) — — Urban Area Boundary N SCALE 1:4,000 T0: FROM � 7 • � �� -�� District of Maple Ridge �::s;�. :,;�;, . His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE N0: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: January 28, 2014 2011-084-RZ COUNCIL SUBJECT: Final Reading: Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6875-2011 Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6853-2011 Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6947-2012 11185 240th Street Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7045-2013 11185 240 Street and 11133 240 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Bylaw Nos. 6875-2011, 6853-2011 and 6947-2012 have been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently were granted third reading. Bylaw No. 7045-2013 was considered and granted three readings by Council on January 14, 2014. The applicant has requested that final reading be granted for each of the bylaws. The purpose of the rezoning is to allow for subdivision into 24 RST (Street Townhouse Residential) lots and a duplex, 37 R-2 (Urban Residential District) single family lots, one remnant R-1 lot to be subdivided when lands to the south along 111 Avenue are developed, and one (1) commercial property. The purpose of Bylaw No. 7045-2013 is to authorize the District to enter into a rental housing agreement with the developer. RECOMMENDATION: That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6875-2011 be adopted; That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6853-2011 and Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6947-2012 be adopted; and That 11185 240th Street Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7045-2013 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The rezoning application and design proposal was revised after land ownership changed. Consequently, the rezoning bylaw already at third reading, was required to be rescinded, modified and scheduled for a new Public Hearing. Council granted first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6853-2011 on August 30, 2011. Council granted first and second readings for site specific text Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6947-2012 and Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6875-2011 on October 9, 2012. Third reading was granted to the OCP Bylaw on November 27, 2012. On July 23, 2013, Council granted amended second readings for the two rezoning bylaws. On August 27, 2013, Council held the new Public 1002 Hearing and granted third reading to the two zone amending bylaws with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed: i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Amendment to Schedules "A", "B" &"C" of the Official Community Plan, including Amendment to Appendix C in Schedule "A" to add the RST Street Townhouse Residential Zone under RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION - Major Corridor Residential Category in the Zoning Matrix on a site-specific basis; iii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iv. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant which addresses storm/rain water management; v. Road dedication as required; vi. Park dedication as required; vii. Registration of a Housing Agreement in accordance with Section 905 of the Local Government Act and an associated Restrictive Covenant stating that the apartment units above the ground floor of the commercial building will be restricted to residential rental units; viii. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the protection of habitat and natural features; ix. Removal of the existing building or buildings; x. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations; and xi. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Residential Parking and the Visitor Parking. The following applies to the above: i. All off- site services were secured and constructed in conjunction with the Goldleaf project (RZ/044/09) located to the north of the subject site. Consequently, Engineering did not require a rezoning servicing agreement for this application; ii. This will be achieved through adoption of the OCP bylaw associated with this application; iii. The Geotechnical Covenant has been executed, and the applicant's lawyer has provided an Undertaking to register this document concurrently with the subdivision plan; iv. The Storm/Rain Water Management Covenant has been executed, and the applicant's lawyer has provided an Undertaking to register this document concurrently with the subdivision plan; v. The road widening and truncation plan as well as another plan for the dedication of a portion of 239 Street will be registered concurrently with the subdivision plan in accordance with the Undertaking provided by the applicant's lawyer; vi. The park land to be dedicated is included in the road widening and truncation plan referenced in point v. above; vii. Adoption of 11185 240th Street Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7045-2013 will enable the necessary documents to be executed and registered concurrently with the subdivision plan in accordance with the Undertaking provided by the applicant's lawyer; viii. The Protection of Habitat and Natural Features Covenant is not required. The necessary Natural Features and Watercourse Protection Development Permit has been issued and the environmentally sensitive lands will be dedicated as park; ix. The applicant's Engineer has confirmed that all buildings and structures have been removed; 2 x. The applicant's Engineer has confirmed that there are no underground tanks on the site; xi. The Visitor and Residential Parking Covenant has been executed, and the applicant's lawyer has provided an Undertaking to register this document concurrently with the subdivision plan. CONCLUSION: As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that final reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6875-2011, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw Nos. 6853-2011 and 6947-2012 and 11185 240th Street Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7045-2013. "Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski" Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP Planner "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by David Pollock" for Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B- Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6875-2011 Appendix C- Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6853-2011 Appendix D- Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6947-2012 Appendix E- 11185 240th Street Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7045-2013 Appendix F - Subdivision Plan 3 APPENDIX A Me Pitt District of Langley 11133 & 1 1 1 85-240 St �! CORPORATION OF — THE DISTRICT OF - � MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Scale: 1:2,500 � �� �, '�f� DATE: Sep 26, 2012 2012-020-DP BY: JV APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 6875-2011 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan No. 6425-2006 WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "A", "B" &"C" to the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 6425-2006; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6875-2011. 2. Schedule "A" of the Official Community Plan shall be amended as follows: Appendix C. Zoning, Section 2. Zoning Matrix, OCP Designation / Category, RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS, Major Corridor Residential Category is amended by adding the following in the Zones column: RST (Street Townhouse Residential), provided this zone shall only be permitted for that portion of the property described as 11185 240 Street (Lot "C" District Lot 404 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19825). 3. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot "C" District Lot 404 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19825 Lot "D" District Lot 404 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19825 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No 820, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw. 4. Schedule "C" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot "C" District Lot 404 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19825 Lot "D" District Lot 404 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19825 1002.1 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No 821, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding and removing Conservation. 5. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the 9t" day of October, A.D. 2012. READ A SECOND TIME the 9th day of October, A.D. 2012 PUBLIC HEARING HELD the 20t" day of November, A.D. 2012. READ A THIRD TIME the 27t" day of November, A.D. 2012. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D.20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER MAP�E RIDGE O��IC IA� C OMMUNITY I��AI� AMENDING Bylaw No.6875 2011 Map No. 820 Frome Urban Residential, Conservation From Toe �Conservation Q Urban Residential To Commerc�c Q i�i�hc�n Re ����nt�., N SCALE 1:2,500 APPENDIX C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 6853-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6853-2011." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot "C" District Lot 404 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19825 Lot "D" District Lot 404 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19825 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1539 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RST (Street Townhouse Residential), R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 30t" day of August, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the 9t" day of October, A.D. 2012. PUBLIC HEARING held the 20t" day of November, A.D. 2012. READ a third time the 27t" day of November, A.D. 2012. SECOND AND THIRD READING WERE RESCINDED the 23 day of July, A.D. 2013. RE-READ a second time the 23rd day of July, A.D. 2013. PUBLIC HEARING held the 27t" day of August, A.D. 2013. RE-READ a third time the 27th day of August, A.D. 2013. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1002.2 MAP�E R D�E ZONE AME�ID �I� �` �w ��.0�53-2011 i `%'a� �Ic. 1539 -�c�� �� 3 (One � a�n� y �ural Residential� �� � �� (�t�eet Tcw�'�ouse Residential� �R 1 (Residential District� QC 1��le�g-��c��ccd Cor�r�ercial� �R 2(Urban Residential Dist��ct� N SCALE 1:2,500 APPENDIX D CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 6947-2012 A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6947-2012." 2. PART 7, COMMERCIAL ZONES, SECTION 701, NEIGHBOURHHOOD COMMERCIAL: C-1, SUBSECTION 1, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, (e) apartment uses is amended adding the following legal description in the correct sequence: Lot "C" District Lot 404 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19825 3. PART 7, COMMERCIAL ZONES, SECTION 701, NEIGHBOURHHOOD COMMERCIAL: C-1 SUBSECTION 8. OTHER REGULATIONS, (b), is amended by adding the following in the correct sequence: The gross floor area of all permitted principal uses shall not in the aggregate exceed 481.1 m2 on the first floor and the gross floor area of Apartment Uses on the second floor shall not exceed 221.38 m2 on Lot "C" District Lot 404 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19825 4. PART 7, COMMERCIAL ZONES, SECTION 701, NEIGHBOURHHOOD COMMERCIAL: C-1 SUBSECTION 8. OTHER REGULATIONS, (f), is amended by adding the following legal description in the correct sequence: Lot "C" District Lot 404 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19825 5. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 9t" day of October, A.D. 2012. READ a second time the 9t" day of October, A.D. 2012. PUBLIC HEARING held the 20t" day of November, A.D. 2012. READ a third time the 27th day of November, A.D. 2012. SECOND AND THIRD READING WERE RESCINDED the 23Yd day of July, A.D. 2013. RE-READ a second time the 23rd day of July, A.D. 2013. 1002.3 PUBLIC HEARING held the 27th day of August, A.D. 2013. RE-READ a third time the 27t" day of August, A.D. 2013. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX E CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 7045-2013 A Bylaw to authorize the District of Maple Ridge to enter into a Housing Agreement for 11185 240t" Street WHEREAS pursuant to Section 905 of the Local Government Act, R.S.B.0 1996, c. 323, as amended, Council may, by bylaw, enter into a housing agreement under that Section; AND WHEREAS Council and 0914038 BC LTD wishes to enter into a housing agreement for the subject property at 11185 240t" Street; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "11185 240t" Street Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7045- 2013". 2. By this Bylaw Council authorizes the District to enter into a housing agreement with Qualico Developments (Vancouver) Inc. (Inc. No. A26101), in respect to the following land: Lot "C" District Lot 404 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19825 3. The Mayor and Corporate Officer are authorized to execute the housing agreement and all incidental instruments on behalf of the District of Maple Ridge. 4. Schedule A, attached to this Bylaw, is incorporated into and forms part of this Bylaw. 5. This bylaw shall take effect as of the date of adoption hereof. READ a first time the 14t" day of January, 2014. READ a second time the 14t" day of January, 2014. READ a third time the 14t" day of January, 2014. ADOPTED the day of , 2014. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1002.4 SCHEDULE A 2011 - 084 - RZ Rental Units Only [Housing Agreement] THIS AGREEMENT dated for reference the day of , 2014 BETWEEN: QUALICO DEVELOPMENTS (VANCOUVER) INC. [Incorporation #A26101] #310 - 5620 - 152�d Street, Surrey, B.C. (V3S 3K2) (hereinafter called the "Covenantor") OF THE FIRST PART AND: THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under the Local Government Act, Chapter 290 of the Revised Statutes of British Columbia, 1979, having its municipal offices at 11995 Haney Place, in the District of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia (V2X 6A9) (hereinafter called the "District") OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS: A. The Covenantor is the registered owner of or has an equity of redemption in certain lands situate in the District of Maple Ridge in the Province of British Columbia, and more particularly known and described as: Lot 19 District Lot 404 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan EPP32520 (hereinafter called the "Lands") B. The District wishes to provide a range of housing options within its jurisdiction. C. The Covenantor and the District wish to enter into this Agreement to restrict the use of housing units to be constructed on the Lands, on the terms and conditions of this Agreement, to have effect as both a covenant under section 219 of the Land Title Act and a housing agreement under section 905 of the Local Government Act. D. The District has adopted a bylaw under Section 905 of the Local Government Act to authorize this Agreement as a housing agreement. NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the premises and the covenants herein contained, the payment of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) paid by the District to the Covenantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties covenant and agree, pursuant to section 905 of the Local Government Act and section 219 of the Land Title Act (British Columbia) as follows: Definitions In this Agreement: (a) "Dwelling Units" means all residential dwelling units located or to be located on the Lands whether those dwelling units are lots or parcels, or parts or portions thereof, into which ownership or right of possession or occupation of the Lands may be subdivided (hereinafter defined) and includes single family detached dwellings, duplexes, townhouses, auxiliary residential dwelling units, rental apartments and strata lots in a building strata plan; (b) "Lands" means the land described in Item 2 of the General Instrument - Part 1 and any part, including a building or a portion of a building, into which said land is subdivided; (c) "Subdivide" means to divide, apportion, consolidate or subdivide the Land, or the ownership or right to possession or occupation of the Land into two or more lots, parcels, parts, portions or shares, whether by plan, descriptive words or otherwise, under the Land Title Act, or otherwise, and includes the creation, conversion, organization or development of "cooperative units" or "shared interest in land" as defined in the Real Estate Act. Use and Occupancy Restrictions 2. All Dwelling Units on the Lands, shall only be used to provide rental accommodation and shall remain as rental accommodation in perpetuity. 3. All Dwelling Units on the Lands, shall be rented only on a month to month basis or under a residential tenancy agreement having a fixed term not exceeding three years, including any rights of renewal. 4. No Dwelling Unit may be occupied except by an individual who occupies pursuant to a rental agreement established in section 3. Subdivision Restrictions 5. The Lands shall not be Subdivided, except by means of a strata plan under the Strata Property Act that includes all of the Dwelling Units within a single strata lot. Notice to Buyers 6. The Covenantor will provide notice of this Agreement to any person or persons intending to purchase a Dwelling Unit prior to any person entering into an agreement of purchase and sale, agreement for sale, or option or similar right to purchase. Strata Bylaws 7. The initial bylaws of the strata corporation formed upon the subdivision of the Lands under the Strata Property Act shall not prevent, restrict or abridge any of the Rental Dwelling Units on the Lands from being used as rental accommodation. 8. This Agreement shall be binding upon all strata corporations. Any strata corporation bylaw which prevents, restricts or abridges the right to use any of the Dwelling Units as rental accommodations shall have no force or effect. 9. The Owner Developer or the Strata Corporation shall not pass any bylaws preventing, restricting or abridging any of the Rental Dwelling Units on the Lands from being used as rental accommodation. Voting 10. No Strata Unit owner, nor any tenant or mortgagee thereof, shall vote for any strata corporation bylaw purporting to prevent, restrict or abridge any of the Rental Dwelling Units on the Lands from being used as rental accommodation. Specific Performance 11. The Covenantor agrees that because of the public interest in ensuring that all of the matters described in this Agreement are complied with, the public interest strongly favours the award of a prohibitory or mandatory injunction, or an order for specific performance or other specific relief, by the Supreme Court of British Columbia at the instance of the District, in the event of an actual or threatened breach of this Agreement. Notice of Housing Agreement 12. For clarity, the Covenantor acknowledges and agrees that: (a) this Agreement constitutes both a covenant under section 219 of the Land Title Act and a housing agreement entered into under section 205 of the Local Government Act; (b) the District is required to file a notice of housing agreement in the Land Title Office against title to the Lands; and (c) once such a notice is filed, this Agreement binds all persons who acquire an interest in the Lands as a housing agreement under section 905 of the Local Government Act. No Obligation to Enforce 13. The rights given to the District by this Agreement are permissive only and nothing in this Agreement imposes any legal duty of any kind on the District to anyone, or obliges the District to enforce this Agreement, to perform any act or to incur any expense in respect of this Agreement. No Effect on Laws or Powers 14. This Agreement does not: (a) affect or limit the discretion, rights duties or powers of the District or the approving officer for the District under the common law or any statute, bylaw or other enactment nor does this Agreement date or give rise to, nor do the parties intend this Agreement to create, any implied obligations concerning such discretionary rights, duties or powers; (b) affect or limit the common law or any statute, bylaw or other enactment applying to the Lands; or (c) relieve the owner from complying with any common law or any statute, regulation, bylaw or other enactment. Indemnity 15. The Covenantor hereby releases the District, and indemnifies and saves the District harmless, from and against any and all actions, causes of actions, suits, claims (including claims for injurious affection), cost (including legal fees and disbursements), expenses, debts, demands, losses (including economic loss) and liabilities of whatsoever kind arising out of or in any way due or relating to the granting or existence of this Agreement, the restrictions or obligations contained in this Agreement or the performance or non-performance by the Covenantor of this Agreement that the City is or may become liable for, incur or suffer. Priority 16. The Covenantor will do everything necessary, at the Covenantor's expense, to ensure that this Agreement is registered against title to the Lands in priority to all liens, charges and encumbrances registered or pending registration against title to the Lands, save and except those specifically approved in writing by the District and those in favour of the District. Waiver 17. An alleged waiver of any breach of this Agreement is effective only if it is an express waiver in writing of the breach. A waiver of a breach of this Agreement does not operate as a wavier of any other breach of this Agreement. Interpretation 18. In this Agreement: (a) reference to the singular includes a reference to the plural, and vice versa, unless the context requires otherwise; (b) reference to a particular numbered section or article, or to a particular lettered Schedule, is a reference to the correspondingly numbered or lettered article, section or Schedule of this Agreement; (c) article and section headings have been inserted for ease of reference only and are not to be used in interpreting this Agreement; (d) the word "enactment" has the meaning given to it in the Interpretation Act (British Columbia) on the reference date of this Agreement; (e) reference to any enactment is a reference to that enactment as consolidated, revised, amended, re-enacted or replace, unless otherwise expressly provided; (f) reference to "party" or the "parties" is a reference to a party, or the parties, to this Agreement and their respective successors, assigns, trustees, administrators and receivers; (g) time is of the essence; and (h) reference to a"day", "month" or "year" is a reference to a calendar day, calendar month, or calendar year unless otherwise expressly provided. Further Acts 19. The Covenantor will do everything reasonably necessary to give effect to the intent of this Agreement, including execution of further instruments. Severance 20. If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court having the jurisdiction to do so, that part is to be considered to have been severed from the rest of this Agreement and the rest of this Agreement remains in force unaffected by that holding or by the severance of that part. No Other Agreements 21. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties regarding its subject and it terminates and supersedes all other agreements and arrangements regarding its subject. Enurement 22. This Agreement binds the parties to it and their respective successors, heirs, executors and administrators. Deed and Contract 23. By executing and delivering this Agreement each of the parties intends to create both a contract and a deed executed and delivered under seal. QUALICO DEVELOPEMNTS (VANCOUVER) INC. by its authorized signatories THE CORPORATE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE was hereto affixed in the presence of: �''�'7 CORPORATE OFFICER SUBDI�/5/ON PLAN OF� L07 C AND D PLAN 19825 EXCEPT PLAN EPP32519 ALL OF DlS7RlC7 L07 404 GROUP 7 NEW WES7MlNSTER DlS7RlC7 e� sz�oze «�� o�mo.a�o,..� �o�a 9 �o �� o�.��...e..��..e���s.o, 0 Plor �PP�3252 APPENDIX F � ll2th Avenue � II , m..�,o,�s o,� �d.�. A�. II ierro Pocifc Land Surv a L�d T0: FROM � 7 • � �� -�� District of Maple Ridge �::s;�. :,;�;, . His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE N0: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: SUBJECT: Final Reading: Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6912-2012 24189 124 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: January 28, 2014 2012-033-RZ COUNCIL Bylaw No. 6912-2012 has been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently was granted third reading. The applicant has requested that final reading be granted. The purpose of the rezoning is to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), to permit future subdivision into two lots. Council granted first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6912-2012 on May 22, 2012. Council granted second reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6912-2012 on July 9, 2013. This application was presented at Public Hearing on August 27, 2013, and Council granted third reading on August 27, 2013. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6912-2012 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on October 10, 2013. On October 10, 2013 Council granted Third Reading to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. NoBylaw# and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6912-2012 with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed: 1. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations. The following applies to the above: 1. A disclosure statement submitted by a Professional Engineer was received January 15, 2014 stating that there is no evidence of underground storage tanks. 1003 CONCLUSION: As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that Final Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6912-2012. "Original signed by Siobhan Murphy" Prepared by: Siobhan Murphy, MA, MCIP, RPP Planning Technician "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by David Pollock" for Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B- Bylaw No. 6912-2012 Appendix C - Subdivision Plan 'r� APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 6912-2012 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6912-2012." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 46 Section 22 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 43885 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1564 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 22nd day of May, 2012. READ a second time the 9t" day of July, 2013. PUBLIC HEARING held the 27t" day of August, 2013. READ a third time the 27t" day of August, 2013. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , 2013. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER MAP�E R D�E ZONE AME�ID NG Bylaw I�o. 6912 2012 Map No. 1�64 From: RS 3(One Family Rural Residentiali To: RS 2(One Family Suburban Residertial) N SCALE 1:2,500 PROPOSED SUBOMSION OF LOT 46 SEC.22 TP.12 N.W.D. PLAN 43885 f0 5 0 ?5.0 Sp.O Scale 1:1000 ,Uarch 28,2012 Wade dc Associotes B.C. Land Surveyors Maple Ridge k Mission H2934-02 Phone 463-4753 APPENDIX C l24 AVENUE �85 District of Maple Ridge COMM/TTEE OF THE WHOLE MEET/NG M/NUTES January 20, 2014 1:00 p.m. Council Chamber PRESENT Elected Officials Appointed Staff Mayor E. Daykin J. Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Councillor C. Ashlie K. Swift, General Manager of Community Development, Councillor C. Bell Parks and Recreation Services Councillor A. Hogarth P. Gill, General Manager Corporate and Financial Services Councillor B. Masse F. Quinn, General Manager Public Works and Development Councillor M. Morden Services C. Carter, Director of Planning ABSENT C. Marlo, Manager of Legislative Services Councillor J. Dueck Other Staff as Required C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental Services J. Charlebois, Manager of Community Planning L. Zosiak, Planner II A. Kopystynski, Planner II D. Hall, Planner II F. Armstrong, Manager of Corporate Communication J. Boehmer, Manager of Design and Construction 1. DELEGA T/ONS/STAFFPRESENTA T/ONS 1.1 Website Update - Fred Armstrong, Manager of Corporate Communication The Manager of Corporate Communication provided an update on the roll-out of the new mapleridge.ca website including information on the focus groups that will meet to review the features of the site. The official launch of the site will take place following the implementation of suggestions from the focus groups and inclusion of the mobile applications. 2. PUBL/C WOR{(S AND DEI/ELOPMENT SERI//CES 1100 Committee of the Whole Minutes January 20, 2014 Page 2 of 10 Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda: 1101 2013-101-RZ, 20758 Lougheed Highway, CS-1 to C-2 Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7048-2013 to rezone from CS-1(Service Commercial) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to construct a new building to house the relocated Mark's Work Wearhouse store be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule C and D of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a Power Point presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject Map • Neighbourhood Context • OCP Context • Site Characteristics • Proposed Site Plan RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. 1102 2013-113-RZ, 21530 Donovan Avenue, RS-1 to RS-1b Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7050-2013 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to allow for future subdivision into two lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a Power Point presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject Map • Neighbourhood Context • OCP Context • Site Characteristics • Proposed Site Plan Committee of the Whole Minutes January 20, 2014 Page 3 of 10 Committee of the Whole Minutes January 20, 2014 Page 4 of 10 RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. 1103 2013-115-RZ, 24440 128 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-2 Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7052-2014 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit future subdivision into approximately seven single family lots be given first reading and the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a Power Point presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject Map • Neighbourhood Context • OCP Context • Site Characteristics • Proposed Subdivision Plan RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. 1104 2012-038-RZ, 12116 and 12170 204B Street, P-2 to R-1 Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7044-2013 to designate land use from Institutional to Urban Residential be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6924-2012 to rezone from P-2 (Special Institutional) to R-1 (Residential District) to permit future subdivision into four residential lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing Committee of the Whole Minutes January 20, 2014 Page 5 of 10 The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a Power Point presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject Map • Neighbourhood Context • OCP Context • Site Characteristics • Proposed Subdivision Plan • Proposed Setback Variances RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. 1105 2013-102-CP, Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 7060-2014 Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 7060-2014 to make minor amendments to the Official Community Plan bylaw be given first, second and third readings. L. Zosiak, Planner gave a Power Point presentation providing the following information: • Background Information • Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw • Housekeeping Amendments • Key Housekeeping Amendments • Additional Amendments • Public Comments RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. 1106 2012-021-DP, 11185 240 Street Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-021-DP to permit a two storey mixed-use commercial/residential project. Committee of the Whole Minutes January 20, 2014 Page 6 of 10 A. Kopystynski, Planner gave a Power Point presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject Map • Neighbourhood Context • OCP Context • Building Elevations • Colour Scheme & Renderings • Proposed Landscape Plan RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. 1107 2012-021-DVP, 11185 240 Street Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-021-DVP to vary building height, setbacks to 112 Avenue and 240 Street and parking for the residential component. A. Kopystynski, Planner gave a Power Point presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject Map • Neighbourhood Context • OCP Context • Site Characteristics • Proposed Setback Variance • Proposed Height Variance RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. 1108 2012-020-DP, 11185 240 Street and 11133 240 Street Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-020-DP to permit 24 street-oriented townhouses in 6 buildings, plus one duplex for a total of 26 dwellings. Committee of the Whole Minutes January 20, 2014 Page 7 of 10 A. Kopystynski, Planner gave a Power Point presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject Map • Neighbourhood Context • OCP Context • Site Characteristics • Proposed Site Plan • Elevations and Colour Scheme • Streetscapes • Landscaping RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. 1109 2012-020-DVP, 11185 240 Street and 11133 240 Street Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-020-DVP to reduce front yard setbacks, widths of back yard space for end units and to apply urban road standards for the RST townhouses, to increase residential building heights for all R-2 lots and to apply the same setbacks and lot width requirements and allow vehicle access from the street rather than from the lane for R-2 lots that abut the lane common to the RST townhouses. A. Kopystynski, Planner gave a Power Point presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject Map • Neighbourhood Context • OCP Context • Site Characteristics • Proposed RST Zone Variances • Proposed R-2 Zone Variances • Setback Variances Summary Committee of the Whole Minutes January 20, 2014 Page 8 of 10 RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. 1110 2013-109-AL, 26520 112 Avenue, Application to Include Land into the Agricultural Land Reserve Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Application 2013- 109-AL be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission. D. Hall, Planner gave a Power Point presentation providing the following information: • Application Information • Subject Map • Neighbourhood Context • OCP Context • Site Characteristics The Planner advised that a letter of concern was received from a resident that the property may be used for a medical marihuana facility if it was included in the Agricultural Land Reserve. She noted that the property would not meet the requirements for such a use without significant variances. She reviewed the differences in permitted usages if the property was included in the Agricultural Land Reserve. David Freemantle. Applicant Mr. Freemantle advised that he wished to obtain inclusion into the Agricultural Land Reserve in order to preserve the trees that are on the property and to provide him with some tax support. The trees are close to extinction and he feels this is the best method available to him to protect them. RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. Committee of the Whole Minutes January 20, 2014 Page 9 of 10 1111 Award of Contract, ITT-EN13-71: Storm Sewer Replacement on Donovan Avenue, 21500 Block Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Contract ITT-EN13- 71: Storm Sewer Replacement on Donovan Avenue, 21500 Block, be awarded to Strohmaier's Excavating Ltd. and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. The Manager of Design and Construction provided further details of the project and the statutory right of way. RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. 3. F/NANC/AL AND CORPORA TE SER �/CES (including Fire and Police) 1131 Disbursements for the month ended December 31, 2013 Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that the disbursements for the month ended December 31, 2013 be approved. RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. 1132 Alternative Approval Process for City Classification Staff report dated January 20,2014 recommending that the alternative approval process to change classification of Maple Ridge from a District Municipality to a city be enacted. RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. Committee of the Whole Minutes January 20, 2014 Page 10 of 10 4. COMMUN/TYDEI/ELOPMENTAND RECREAT/ON SERI//CES 1151 Rescind Maple Ridge Policies 4.01, 4.03 and 4.11 Staff report dated January 20, 2014 recommending that Policies 4.01, 4.03 and 4.11 be rescinded. RECOMMENDA T/ON That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 28, 2014. 5. CORRESPONDENCE - N i I 6. OTHER /SSUES - N i I 7. ADJOURNMENT - 2:15 p. m. 8. COMMUN/TYFORUM Catherine Ward Ms. Ward submitted a petition to end non-resident parking on 118 Avenue along with photographs to support the petition. She outlined her concerns over the parking along 118 Avenue and 203 Street. Mayor Daykin suggested that Ms. Ward meet with the General Manager of Public Works and Development. C. Bell, Acting Mayor Presiding Member of the Committee h�l�PCE RID9E �ll�h qeyrhY • .� District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: January 20, 2014 and Members of Council FILE N0: 2013-101-RZ Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7048-2013 20758 Lougheed Highway EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from CS-1 (Service Commercial) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to construct a new building to house the relocated Mark's Work Wearhouse store. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7048-2013 be given first reading; and; That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule C and D of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: South Teck Construction, LLP Jack Hastings Nandolin Holdings Ltd Lot: A, D.L.: 250, Plan: New Westminster District P8735 Commercial CS-1(Service Commercial) C-2 (Community Commercial) Use: Service Commercial Zone: CS-1(Service Commercial) and C2 (Community Commercial) Designation: Commercial Use: Residential Zone: RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential 1101 East: West: Use: Service Commercial Zone: CS-1(Service Commercial) Designation: Commercial Use: Service Commercial Zone: CS-1(Service Commercial) Designation: Commercial, Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Service Commercial Retail Commercial 0.353 hectares (1.28 acres) Two access points: Lougheed Highway and Owen Street Urban Standard This site is located on Lougheed Highway one block east of the intersection of Lougheed Highway and 207 Street. It is situated in a commercial hub that begins several blocks east of 207 Street and continues west along Lougheed Highway to the municipal boundary. The site contains a single one- story building that fronts Lougheed Highway, and houses several businesses - an interior design centre and a child care resource and referral centre. The building is flanked by at-grade parking on the south, east and north sides and can be accessed from the north via Lougheed Highway and from Owen Street to the west. c) Project Description: The applicant proposes to construct a new building to house the relocated Maple Ridge Mark's Work Wearhouse store. This new building will provide approximately double the square footage that they currently have. The building size will be larger than the current building, but the location on site will be similar, with parking north, west and south and retain the same two access points. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is designated Commercial in the Official Community Plan. Due to the site's location on Lougheed Highway outside of the Town Centre, and based on Policy 6-23 (a), this development is subject to the General Commercial policies of the OCP. The objective of the General Commercial category as stated in the OCP is to "respond to emerging market trends and shopping preferences and to permit greater flexibility in the range of commercial uses". The C-2 (Community Commercial) zone aligns with the General Commercial category. -2- Zoning Bvlaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 20758 Lougheed Highway from CS-1 (Service Commercial) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit the construction of a commercial retail building. This application will require a Development Variance Permit to vary the parking requirements for this zone. The Parking and Loading Bylaw requires that a commercial building provide one stall per 30 m2 of retail space. The applicant has provided 45 parking stalls on the proposed site plan, whereas the required number of stalls based on the building footprint area is 49 stalls. Additionally, 10 percent of the total number of parking stalls is allowed to be small car parking stalls, and the applicant is requesting the ratio be increased to 22 percent, or 10 of the 45 stalls. This variance will be the subject of a future report to Council. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.5 of the Official Community Plan, a Commercial Development Permit application is required to address the current proposal's compatibility with adjacent development, and to enhance the unique character of the community. Advisory Design Panel: A Commercial Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second reading. e) Interdepartmentallmplications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Building Department; d) Fire Department; and e) Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. This evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); and 2. A Commercial Development Permit Application (Schedule D). -3- The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. "Original signed by Siobhan Murphy" Prepared by: Siobhan Murphy, MA, MCIP, RPP Planning Technician "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B- Zone Amending Bylaw 7048-2013 Appendix C- Proposed Site Plan '� P 56403 48 � � \ O N � N � N O � N � N 6 11842 5 11836 � 4 M ti 11828 a 3 11820 2 11810 Rem 1 1 11792 � � 2� 11782 � � —� 3 N Scale: 1:1,500 � P8 18 M M � O N � � N <,.) � � O 0 N N 35 36 P 3 898 M c.�p 2411819 N a 11807 25�, 26 M � 0 N District of Langley rn rn � 0 N 119 AVE. 35 P 8 35 P 104 4 Rem 16 15 1 B 17 � � � � � O � � � c�l � � � c+� N N N o P 10414 N SUBJECT PROPERTY — LOUGHEED HIGHWqy �� L!') � �� O 0 N N � � • : i q j Rem 1 �; (P 8735) P 17371 �z ! o � �$22 P 17371 � 13 O � 0 M � 0 N 5 P 12034 NWS 258 j i M 120 4 I � �` P 6 695 3 4 ; � a � � �� M ���2 � ! � 4 0 97 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 � N N N N N N N N CAMWOOD AVE *PP056 � ao 0 0 o co o co co 7 N o0 o g 197 � o 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N � 211 212 213 214 215 216 M 198 � 11798 P 4 � 11789 p 4 5 a 11776 P 4 797 P 59 96 199 �« ..... ..... ....,. ..... ...... ....,. 20758 LOUGHEED HWY � 0 .� � � o �t CORPORATION OF �� THE DISTRICT OF � - � MAPLE RIDGE FINANCE DEPARTMENT l� , DATE: Oct 23, 2013 FILE: 2013-101-RZ BY: PC APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 7048-2013 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7048-2013." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot A District Lot 250 Group 1 Plan New Westminster District 8735 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1603 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to C-2 (Community Commercial). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , 20 READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of ,20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER P 76445 B 11935 ii9AVE. RW78433 / /� ��A�� /� (P 87086) �� ��L�� ��v�Q � � � LM P 6890 32 �/ rn I � � N 0 rn N 1 BCP 34169 11910/50/98 LP 65229 LP 60327 LMP 5719 LP 65855 NWS 2523 P 54395 47 m 0 N 43 P 54703 44 83 P 54703 2088 zoaa 87 82 P 58243 8 RW 56524 119 AV E. � P 56403 P 8 35 P 8 35 P 104 4 I � 48 m 18 R � 16 15 1 B I N ��F�° )Q \ � M � m EP 54361 M (P 70935) � 3g �7 7 ` � � � � � � � 0 0 � � � N� N o N o � P 10414 W EP 74390 LMP 15725 101 N O M � RW 43436 RW 832�6 N I I I N N P 663 � o� � � LOUGHEED HIGHWqy N �N n 6 �, N o� o RW 67461 N N W i842 35 36 � N � 5 A Rem 1 � � N o 1836 � P 3 898 5 N 4 I ��A�� � (P 8735) P 17371 P 12034 5 6 7 45 � � iia2a a �,., NWS 2589 P 1237 �� �� RP 9591 3 � 24»a�9 o iia22 P 17371 I i � I �� iiais iia2 2 a »ao� M 13 �� 120 4 M I P 1 376 �I IW RP115968 iiaio 25�, 26 a P6 695r r3 Iv 4 1� �2 �3 �,4 �,4 a 1�,3 �,2 �32 � 11795 Rem 1 � �4 `r° 97 � 98 �°r' d ro w ro ro �m ro� I ro ro o O O O O I W O O O O O O O � N � � N N N N N N N N N N N N � RW 63828 � RW 78108 "PP056 CAMWOOD AVE. I\ RW 75415 � °J ro o o � o � o � � � � ro a °� 1 � �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � ���92 � MI 7� o N o 6 197 N o N o N o N �333 � o 0 I� Pcl. "I" 2� N� M � 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 � 33 � 3P 45 39� W 82443 � � RP 15896 tna2 `r' d EP 5 635 � 198189 o insa P 4 797 � � � � NWS 3167 3 4 5 199 a�m6 P 4 79� a a P 4 315 � ����a P 59 96 1779 ' 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 332 �,334 336 337 I 1n57 0 � � � � � � � � ro � ZOO � O � N O O N O N O /� RW 83957 1n�� N P 54899 McFARLANE AVE. "PP056 � � _ 201 � — — — 369 11765 33958 �I —/ � ���a� 202 0 241 240 0 0 229 0 0 0 0 — — — — 11759 N N N N N N N -- ii�25 �n5a 11753 11756 228 227 226 225 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 7048-2013 Map No. 1603 From: CS-1 (Service Commercial) To: C-2 (Community Commercial) N SCALE 1:2,500 �OUGHEED HIGHWqy ��-� �,��� . . � i r-_ � .- �._ . -_�. . � . ��� __ . i - ��_ � s ��-- _ � I - " - r � a r- _ ��,_,� � 4 I � , o �— / � � � � , F_e�3=�rci I I .., � ,. ,^ � I I �� � I � - c I e �r i i '" Mo��s -o I � -- —�-- -------- '� I : I � _ _ _ _ _ � _ _ _ — _ � I I I� i I I i I � � � � RETAILISPALE I I I � � � I H W 3I � � I W $� � I � , r- --I-- - - --- - � bl� _ � I Z I L 1 I w � � _�_ 0 J o � � 0° Ir � - I I L _ I I I � _ — _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ � I �f�i "J I - _ __ � I II � � , � 0 i � � � i �' � � � � � i i 0 I � I' . I . ' � r� � I I I � I Inosm� i..vti��in�n., - I � � [iow'1 I ' � - - �� - - - - - -L = - - --� -srea,�SEnnas,ti— � _ i � � �� � `�. ��� �o_�� ' i - o e e� 3.z - — � � , � , i < i s•si I, u _ . . .... �i� si� P�ati �,._�so APPENDIX C ZONING ANALY515 LE6AL DESCRIPTION �orr DL'L J KOUI' ' �'ND NLhN�JP �3.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 20��8 LOJ6HEED HI6HWPV MAPLE KIY.�E, 8.0 51TE INFORMATION SirEn�En_ � r.�(s».���..s.r.) (6 bh ^ m') ZDNING'. C 2 5I1E COVERAGE: BUILDING AREAS �-TAIL�. 1 f( " � Lh�.F.J SORn6EAREa zz n; ni r.; n MFZZANNE: I8)) 1, �I - TOTAL- i,dc.,n ('�,5..��F.) BUILDIN6 FOOTPRINT 1,643 m� (1�,6d5 S.F) PARKIN6 REQUIREMENTS RETAIL'd 15PAGE PEK322925.F. 15,�2a / 322525 F. PA2KIN62EQUIRED- 4Ch25 STORAGE CA11 SPACE PER 200L S.F. 3,922 / 2J02 S.F_ PARKIN6�4UIKED= 2GAK5 TOTALPARKIN6KEQUREO o1CAZ5 TGTALPAZKINGPZOVIDED 46GnF5 LE6END: - ---- VROFERTYI N=_ - - - - - - - SETBACK LINEOFEIiIV 511_DI� i� FRFMOVED � CONGREIES[E/5LK O SOFr�ANo, �,r��,-�� �„�����,,-�P��N VARIANCES REQUIRED: L FAKIIALKEAF6ElPn4CKl0PLLOWFOZ_OAI)NG�`FCC P�KKINC �FLGUL�TI0�5 3. NO J�GKADES ALONGOWEN STREET MARK'S WORK WEAR HOUSE 20758 LOl1GHEEO HIGHWAV, MAPLE RIOGE, B.C. fECK CONSTRUCTION LLP HrvGLEYt 6 n si �,�. SITE PLAN - �. °�� q� oF h�l�PCE RID9E �ll�h qeyrhY • .� District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: January 20, 2014 and Members of Council FILE N0: 2013-113-RZ Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7050 - 2013 21530 Donovan Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone 21530 Donovan Avenue, the subject property, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), to allow for future subdivision into two lots. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7050 - 2013 be given first reading; and That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owners: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: South ABM Engineering Services B. Johar and J. Talwar Lot 5, District Lot 247, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 8981 Urban Residential RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-1(Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential 1102 East: West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-1(Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 0.13 ha (0.32 acres) Donovan Avenue Urban Standard The subject property is approximately 0.13 ha (0.32 acres) and is surrounded by single family residential development to the east, west and south, and Donovan Avenue to the north (see Appendix A). McKenney Creek is located south of the subject property; therefore it is anticipated that a restrictive covenant for the watercourse protection will be required (see Appendix B). c) Project Description: The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to allow future subdivision into two lots. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is located within the Urban Area and is designated Urban Residential - Neighbourhood Residential. This designation is characterized by not being within the Regional Town Centre, a neighbourhood with an Area Plan, a Community Commercial Node, nor located on a Major Corridor, as illustrated on Figure 4 of the OCP. A maximum of one principal dwelling unit per lot and an additional dwelling unit such as a secondary suite or garden suite is permitted, with density that is based on the current zoning of the property or surrounding neighbourhood context. Single detached dwellings will remain the predominant housing form within neighbourhoods, but other housing forms such as duplexes and triplexes that resemble single detached dwellings are possible, subject to Neighbourhood Residential Infill policies. -2- Zoning Bvlaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property, located at 21530 Donovan Avenue from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) (see Appendix C) to permit future subdivision into two single family lots of approximately 650 m2 (see Appendix D). Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. e) Interdepartmentallmplications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Licences, Permits and Bylaws Department; e) Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; and f) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); 2. A Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); and 3. A Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. -3- CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge's Approving Officer. "Original signed by Michelle Baski" Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT Planning Technician "Original signed by Charles R. Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng. GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B- Site Context Map Appendix C- Zone Amending Bylaw 7050 - 2013 Appendix D- Proposed Subdivision Plan '� 3 � 4 . . / P 6 447 21574 11969 � � 2 26 � 1 � �14�13 �12 �11 � � N N N N N 21568 n� A ASHBURY CRT. 2�56 � �15�16�17�18�19�20 ����, �'Sso 4 24 EP13421 � 21� � 22 23 N � P V79 O � P 121 7 P 72 80 P 7 382 P$981 11939 P 7 707 15 � q o g� C � P 898 6 11929 � � � °' 1 � 2 SUBJECT PROPERTY � � � N N N N N � N DONOVAN AVE. � � � � O o0 N N N � � � � � � � 00 � � � � � 1 � 2 N 3 N 4 N N N N N N BC 23 37 5 P 8981 � 2 REM BCP 239 5 BCP 1 387 3 P 8981 1 11897 — — � . A 11887 21 20 19 18 17 � 6 114 EP 15205 � � � � � � � 15 � 11885 �' � t9 � w � � �°' 11881 � � CHERRINGTON PLACE N 281890 � � � � � \ 25 °�° °�° � 11892 I `� >P \ S 201 N Scale: 1:1,500 � � 26 27 29 3� \ 33 32 31 �, 30 � s ��� ��� ��� �� C� � "�� \2�2� CHEAVE GTON / � District of Langley 26 �`�� 14 P 29449 118g� 115 116 118g3 13 11875 P 60 76 11861 11895 � 2 10 g g 7 6 5 � � � � � � �, � � �, 4 � 11 � � � � �; � � N � � � � � N N N N N N CHERRINGTON AVE. 321 0 N �' 322 I I I I I � 21530 DONOVAN AVENUE 0 .� � � o �t CORPORATION OF �� THE DISTRICT OF � - � MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT l� , DATE: Dec 3, 2013 FILE: 2013-113-RZ BY: PC APPENDIX B - � -.;�� � � �z.�, � . - . t � :, �� _ - C'� . , . � ' �. � �'1 a l v ,�_� � . � - s{' � - �. I�" � , L� i �; ,fi �. � � . � � - ¢�`-"`� � ` �.��.-i � `� ��'• � "' � i.��. .� _ �_ ,, y •,. � ' � �� - s i �r�' - � 7 �'* � ' � - - � �',� ;:,� � F � I� �, � �` �.: �; k � I � . �� � r , �y� ?, � � � �: � r ' �� ' . .:�;.' ; . . �' � � . �� -... r 't � � �r.' - . � � ,� � , ,- R 1^'�r` .. . _• � �'��'' _ � L��� ' . ' - " A �F � �I � ' .� � �� � � � ���4 � �l� E . ' � _ �.�-• 4" ' 17 � � * „£� �� �'� �� "��������F` �"�'i `*�•� ��' '_ � �;^�»a L� � ��.���` �'�f ". h �' :F- '-� ��1'�F�'*R # _s�y, � , � , * � i� � . � ' k � ,. . • - _ �y "� 9 C l'S � " ' f .�M' - -'�Yi' � ` � '1" •��-;. �S� ' ? r "- . _r,�a� � �. . � . � I � � � . . � S ' � , � I k s� � � � `;"- ' N� r�� � � d, , �•I r� � � �_ ' � � . � � � . � � I � � . a � �� . . ; . �-.�: �-. �;.,. �,�.' � . ..� : — _"�'�'�`r 1 " .4 ' .{. � �. r° � � � • ` � �.,. '�� � . 'w—. PS��i.= . �; . � � � � s� � � ' i: "'p '�,Y'i�l r � � ��� � i ���� I� �x �; . '���-x ` ���.� y,�• r . � �� �'— t � — _ — � i �3« . _ �. � �- . ., . � �. r�.����- � No structures ardistur�an�e � �-,. �ti � �� � �� � l� �. y�" within this area_ Pnssibilit� � - �- � � . � to pr�tect this area �nrith a _. .fy;.r ��s. ' r I:�y {;�,,'�. � .� . . .. „� r.� • _ �� �,,, � �. . �.;~ ' � � ��„ conservati�n covenant_ �...,� : - - ,-',� . " $ �� r" ��� �a� s. �� .�_� ` ,,� ,� � �'� `' d � � ��� .��� .� � 'r- �;'{ _ ��1�#�ti`E'. � �' k l ,{ = L!' . �e. y.� .: �•q .h. .�•- d. � . .1a- - t'�*'� Y +� '' ��� J I • � ' � - ` •; : � . � �� �� * �Y .5 5 .'. � — J.� _ * �. � �� . .� � y � r ,.��r' S < , �":" �-��`� � - } ..ryr` � /� — . � � ,� 5~__ �N'f � ��r�� • a _ �+ ^ �,�L '`� � � +� k '� � � l ; �� r � .- � „� ' k.� — — — y � � � — � _ ��� - r': :.�-� ` - ��. �` .�� �t � . ��wlcKenne}r�reekrvith � .: •�rY�-a.�_� `-`�`��'�`�:, k ��. �-9� i 15 rr�eter setbaek ;;,�":� F� _'�'1�"'�i=�• ,�, �� �- ,� -r��- ��_ ��. - - k � - . *... �-�:'�;, _�, .:-� 1 , � �- ' �:`I��'�. �s k�� k. '� � l� �t �. .. .., �#. �.� k �. k � . . � ,+ ., : , � _. � �] � �' • � The Corporation of the District of fvlaple Ridge ���� � k ma4aes no- guarantee regardint� the accuracy �(� '_ �k. �- or present status of the infor�ation shown o-n � '� �. �x. r��'�; {�, this maP- _ .�` _ y�.r ; .,i- �,l` ��. N 1 1' � � � � 2'��30 DOnOVan AVe h�1ea Y--j -- �"� � � �I�E �OC1�E}[t � � � � �� � i� ' 4 ���P��ATI��1 �� -� !� Ti-iE DI�Tl�I�T �F ��� � � a f�IAPLE RID�E District of � ���� PLAFJ!JihG 6EPARTNE�IT SCALE 1:504 F��� � DATE: Jan 13, 201� FILE: Untitled HY: R� APPENDIX C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 7050-2013 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. 2 3 This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7050-2013." That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 5 District Lot 247 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 8981 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No.1604 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the READ a second time the PUBLIC HEARING held the READ a third time the day of day of day of day of ,20 ,20 , 20 , 20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 3 4 �' 14 � 13 � 12 � 11 � � � Z ' �� Kw ���r�5 N N N N N N I 21568 �� /q ASHBURY CRT. ?�ss4 o � o � � �' N N ��S EP 13421 .• • � •• � � � i 3�3 3� 21 �15�,16�17�18�19�20,i � �, so 24 N N N P 679 0 N� i21`� �' 22 23 P 121 7 P 6 962� �, 72 80 P 7'382 P 8981 P 7 707 15 i i � A o B`� C M� M2 �A�� g�; 1� 2 P89816 � � � � � � � � � � � N N N N N N N N N N OVAN AVE. c9 � � o � ol I o � N N O N �M � � � � 11939 11929 1�, 2N � �i �o� � � � � 2 � 3 N 4 N� ��N N N N N BC 23 37_ / N -%�- � �� 8981 � 2 REM /, � - BC 23� � �P 239 5 i BCP 1 387 3 P 8981 1 1 8 9 7 � �0 7� _�RW 6 7 � _ ��ss7 21��20�19`18 17� 16 � A � � � � � � 5 114 EP 15205 � � �� `� �� �� �. cA�� � � � � � � � �\ �/� g � � 11885 � � �'`$$ ' P 29449 11881 EP 60778 � 14 CHERRINGTON PLAC� �189�_ _ 115 116 �N � 11890 �1893 13 11875 I� I 28 � � P 60 �76 I 11861 25 °° °° 26 � 27 ' 29 � � s92 11895 � 2-, � 0 i 9; 8 � 7 i 6 5 I �_ --- � �� � � � � — �— — — �� � I� M �n � 33 � 32 � 31 ���, 30 � 11 �� i� ,�; ��; �� i� 4 � �j \C�j \C�j \s�� CV N IN IN IN IN �N �� �`>�, �`r>, � CHERRINGTON AVE. � � CHERRINGTON EP 63343 � - _ MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 7050-2013 Map No. 1604 From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) N SCALE 1:1,500 ;� - Sk'ETCH SHOWING PROPOSED SUBDI i//S/ON 21530 Donovan Avenue, Map/e Ridge Donovan A venue 15.24 15.24 4 P/an BCP23935 �7 P/an 60776 0 0 �6 �BUILDlN6 ENIiELOPE � Prop osed Lot � Area = 650.5 m2 � 0 � z � m I � BUILDING ENIiELOPE � 0 0 �o � BUILD/NG ENVELOPE I 0 0 � 15.23 �6 P/an 60776 Prop osed Lot 2 Area = 650.1 m2 �.. �� �;an 898r APPENDIX D I I �BUILD/NG ENIiELOPE� 15.23 SRW Plan /60777 SCALE 1 : 250 -0 5 10 15 20 25 m Terra Pacific Land Surveyinq Ltd 22371 St. Anne Avenue, Maple Ridge, BC 0 0 � i P/an BCP15387 15 P/an 60776 NO rE_- CURRENT RS-1 ZONING REZONE i0 RS-1 b AS SHOWN DATE.• October 11, 2013 Tel: 604-463-2509 Fle: MR13-876sk_SUB � � � urrn Kaai_ I:: -s; . ..,., T0: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: January 20, 2014 and Members of Council FILE N0: 2013-115-RZ Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7052-2014 24440 128 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit future subdivision into approximately seven single family lots no less than 0.4 ha (1 acre) in area. A portion of the property adjacent to Bosa Creek will be dedicated as Park for conservation purposes; therefore, an OCP amendment will be required to designate that area as Conservation. The subject property was previously under application 2011-078-RZ for a similar subdivision layout; however, the property directly west was also included in the application. Application 2011-078-RZ received first reading but was closed due to inactivity in September 2012. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7052-2014 be given first reading; and; That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. 1103 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North South East: West: Wayne Stephen Bissky Architecture And Urban Design Olga Anas Lot: 1, Section: 22, Township: 12, Plan: NWP23770 Suburban Residential Suburban Residential and Conservation RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Use: Vacant Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential Use: Vacant Municipal lands Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Estate Suburban Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 4.046 ha (10 acres) 128 Avenue Suburban Standard The subject site is located outside of the Urban Area Boundary, south and east of the South Alouette River, south of the 128 Avenue road right-of-way, and west of Alouette Road. An equestrian trail and the Bosa Creek run along the northern property line within the 128 Avenue road right-of-way, which were both recently improved through construction activity for the sanitary sewer main extension on 128 Avenue. The land slopes down to the Alouette River from the embankment on the municipal lands to the south; however, the subject site itself is relatively flat and vacant with the exception of an outbuilding. The majority of the property is densely vegetated. c) Project Description: The applicant has submitted a proposal to rezone the property to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) and subdivide the lands into suburban residential lots no less than 0.4 ha (1 acre) in area, with a new local road proposed on the site. -2- At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject site is designated Suburban Residential in the Official Community Plan, which permits a single detached housing form located outside of the Urban Area Boundary. The RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone is in compliance with this designation, and requires city water and private sewage disposal system. The setback areas on the property for the protection of Bosa Creek on the property will be dedicated as park for conservation purposes. An amendment to the Official Community Plan will be required to designate the watercourse protection area as Conservation. Zoning Bvlaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 24440 128 Avenue from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit future subdivision into approximately seven lots (see Appendix C). Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. e) Interdepartmentallmplications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Building Department; d) Fire Department; and e) Parks Department. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. This evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Early and Ongoing Consultation: In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early -3- posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. g) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); 3. A Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); and 4. A Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: Justification has been provided to support an Official Community Plan amendment to allow a portion of the site to be designated as Conservation. The RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone aligns with the Suburban Residential designation, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. It is recommended that Council not require any further additional OCP consultation. It is expected that once complete information is received, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7052-2014 will be amended. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge's Approving Officer. "Original si ned bv Amelia Bowden" Prepared by: Amelia Bowden Planning Technician "Original signed b�Charles R. Goddard " for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Ouinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B- Zone Amending Bylaw 7052-2014 Appendix C- Proposed Subdivision Plan � N District of Langley � 24440 128 AVE N U E 0 .� � � o �t CORPORATION OF �� THE DISTRICT OF � - � MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Scale: 1:2,500 � `� ��, _�`�- L--� 1--�° �'� DATE: Dec 4, 2013 FILE: 2013-115-RZ BY: PC APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 7052-2014 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7052-2014." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Section 22 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 23770 3 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1605 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , 20 READ a second time the PUBLIC HEARING held the READ a third time the ADOPTED, the day of day of day of day of ,20 � , 20 , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 7052-2014 Map No. 1605 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) N SCALE 1:3,000 p,b� z oi z i �Sth ,4��lU� APPENDIX C 0909 iv 7. YVrillen Statement & Compliance Leller (Rezoning) 2 0l2 � � District of Maple Ridge T0: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: FILE N0: MEETING: January 20, 2014 2012-038-RZ CofW SUBJECT: First and Second Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7044 - 2013 and Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6924 - 2012 12116 and 12170 204B Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone 12116 and 12170 204B Street, the subject properties, from P-2 (Special Institutional) to R-1 (Residential District) to permit the future subdivision into four residential lots. This rezoning application applies to the third and final subdivision phase of the Maple Ridge Christian School development, which recently subdivided 19 residential lots to the west of the subject properties. This application requires an amendment to the Official Community Plan to re-designate the land use from Institutional to Urban Residential. This application received first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6924 - 2012 on May 22, 2012. The bylaw has been revised slightly to reflect the existing road pattern that was revised to accommodate a covenanted grave site on the school property and to incorporate the new legal descriptions. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7044 - 2013 be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7044 - 2013 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw; 1104 3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7044 - 2013 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7044 - 2013 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6924 - 2012 be amended as identified in the staff report dated January 20, 2014, and be given second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing; and 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading. i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; and ii. Amendment to Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Descriptions: OCP: Zoning: Surrounding Uses North: South: East: David Laird, DAMAX Consultants Villagewalk Homes Ltd. Lots C and D, District Lot 241, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan EPP30995 Existing: Proposed Existing: Proposed Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Institutional Urban Residential P-2 (Special Institutional) R-1(Residential District) Park RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Park Single Family Residential RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) and RT-1(Two Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Maple Ridge Christian School P-2 (Special Institutional) Institutional -2- West: Use: Vacant Zone: R-1(Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: Maple Ridge Christian School Single Family Residential 0.15 ha (0.38 acres) 204B Street Urban Standard 2012-038-SD, 2012-038-VP The applicant is seeking to rezone and subdivide four single family lots from existing Lots C and D, located at 12116 and 12170 204B Street (see Appendix A). Lots C and D were previously subdivided through subdivision application 2012-094-SD. The lots have since been purchased by Villagewalk Homes Ltd. from the Haney-Pitt Meadows Christian Association. The current application seeks to regain some lots lost due to the need to alter the overall street/lot pattern of the overall development to accommodate a grave site. The existence of the grave site required the need to adjust the recently adopted zoning boundaries on the school property. The applicant was aware of this problem but preferred to complete the original rezoning application RZ/004/06 and then adjust it with this second application rather than delay the entire project. The grave site will now remain on the school site rather than within the road right-of-way, by locating the road westward on the site. This adjustment requires the rezoning of a 751 m2 (Lot C) and a 794 m2 (Lot D) portion of the school site from P-2 (Special Institutional) to R-1 (Residential District) to accommodate 4 lots and a small portion of 204B Street from R-1(Residential District) to P-2 (Special Institutional). c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The Haney-Pitt Meadows Christian Association recently subdivided off Lots A, C, and D under Subdivision Application 2012-094-SD, and sold these three lots to Villagewalk Homes Ltd. Lot A was rezoned to R-1 (Residential District) under Rezoning Application RZ/004/06, and is under a current Subdivision Application 2012-080-SD, to be subdivided into 19 residential lots. Lots C and D were not rezoned at the same time and are currently zoned P-2 (Special Institutional) and are designated Institutional. An OCP amending bylaw is required to amend the designation from Institutional to Urban Residential to allow the single family development to occur (see Appendix B). This OCP amendment is supportable as the original lot configuration and yield was altered due to the presence of a grave site, and the Haney-Pitt Meadows Christian Association agreed to subdivide and sell lots C and D. The Urban Residential - Neighbourhood Residential Infill designation allows for single detached dwellings, secondary suites, garden suites, and duplexes and triplexes that resemble a single detached dwelling. This designation is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood context. -3- Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 12116 and 12170 204B Street from P-2 (Special Institutional) to R-1 (Residential District) to permit future subdivision into approximately four R-1 (Residential District) lots (see Appendix C). A copy of the previous Zone Amending Bylaw that received first reading on May 22, 2012 is attached for reference (see Appendix D). The R-1 (Residential District) lots are proposed to be approximately 15 m in width and 25 m in depth, which is in compliance with the R-1(Residential District) zone (see Appendix E). Proposed Variances: The applicant has requested rear yard setback variances for lots 20 through 23, from 8 metres to 6 metres. This requested variance is due to the lot geometry, and is supportable as the rear setback for the R-1 (Residential District) zone is proposed to be revised to 6 metres in the draft Zoning Bylaw. The applicant has also requested a front yard setback variance from 5.5 m to 3.0 m for lot 21, as the non-rectangular shape of the lot is more impacted by the shallow depth and the reduced setback will allow for a better building design and streetscape (see Appendix F). The applicant has requested a variance to increase the maximum allowable height for lots 20 through 22 from 9 metres to 11 metres. The increase in height is supportable, as it is consistent with the proposed changes to the R-1 (Residential District) zone in the draft Zoning Bylaw, and the height of the homes in the new development to the west. The maximum allowable height for Lot 23 will not be varied and will be a non-basement home to conform with the existing home to the south. A restrictive covenant will be registered on Lot 23 for the height restriction at the subdivision stage. The requested variances will be the subject of a future report to Council. Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: The applicant will need to provide two parking spaces per dwelling unit, as per the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw. Development Permits: A Form and Character Development Permit is not required for this single-family residential development. 'l�! Advisory Design Panel: A Form and Character Development Permit is not required and therefore this application does not need to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel. Development Information Meetin�: A Development Information Meeting was held on January 29, 2013 as part of the overall development of the larger parcel of land. Concerns were raised with respect to traffic flow from 121B Avenue to 203 Street, and parking during construction and school events. The intersection of 121B Avenue and 203 Street is not expected to be impacted by the addition of these four proposed lots. The applicant suggested that residents apply for "resident only" parking passes if they are concerned with non-residents parking on the streets in the area. There are also proposed improvements to the school site that will allow for approximately 20 more stalls than are required by the Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw. d) Interdepartmentallmplications: Engineering Department: Required services are in place for the rezoning application, therefore a Rezoning Servicing Agreement is not required. Service connections and mains will be provided to each of the proposed lots at the subdivision stage. e) Intergovernmentallssues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, to re-designated lots C and D from Institutional to Urban Residential is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and is determined to have no impact. �'� CONCLUSION: It is recommended that first and second reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7044 - 2013, and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6924 - 2012, as amended in this report, be given second reading, and that application 2012-038-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. "Original signed by Michelle Baski" Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT Planning Technician "Original signed by Charles R. Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng. GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B- OCP Amending Bylaw Appendix C- Zone Amending Bylaw Appendix D- Previous Zone Amending Bylaw Appendix E - Subdivision Plan Appendix F- Proposed Setback Variances � Cit f Pitt , ._ f�J Mea ows ' --- 6 �r � - �- r , ;, � � . � r �� N �� � � � � �� _ f District of � . � Langley Scale: 1:1,000 �� FRASER R.�� 121 16/12170-204B St � 0 .� � � o * CORPORATION OF " — THE DISTRICT OF 0 - � MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Dec 3, 2013 2012-038-RZ BY: JV APPENDIX 6 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 7044-2013 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "B" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7044-2013." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot C District Lot 241 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan EPP30995 Lot D District Lot 241 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan EPP30995 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 873, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw, is hereby redesignated to Urban Residential. 3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , 20 READ A SECOND TIME the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , 20 READ A THIRD TIME the day of , 20 ADOPTED the day of , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER L 122b9 N I � y y y u�Oi m n �m rn °�' � in � o 0 12245 m ��vir ILYLV ,as 13 � N o 0 0 o Ng N8 N7 N6 N5 N4 N 9 N10 N11 20 �19 0 �15 14� N13 � LM 1593 P� 15 I�16 �7L �1594 MP 510 LM 277 4 1 426 12 35 N o o N LM 351 8 12 13 14 15 21m �22 N 16 67 p� E�1F�, G� H� ��N10 �11 �12�130140 0 0 0 �o � �22P��MP� � 26 C M � O�j � � � � O O � N N N N N N N N � � �ZZ3� N N N ry O O N N N N � ZYN 2J �ZZZJ 122AVE. 23 � LM 124 6 27 0 0 1N 2� NN M� �� KN �N N LMP 0897 P 18526 M LM 272 9 � 1 � 2 m 3�, 4N 5� 6 � 7m 8�, 9N N r m m rn o o c� M � � � a a a a a a N N N N N N N N N � J 1216 AVE. 1215o BCP 41029 � EPP 32529 A EPP 32528 / EPP 32518 EPP 30995 EP 80908 � EP 23007 � P 22101 Rem 1 EPP 12170 ——�— — EP 69207 I �P 69729 � — — � LMP 1280 P 41572 � �EPP 31930 45 I iziao I 12122 � P 41572 � iziie 44 � I EPP 30 9! B EPP 30995 LMP 578 1 i22oa � 12194 � � 0 P 54677 12�80 46 12166 12150 12209 12138 i2i2a �2»p 2o i— IYUCU N LM 569 37 �koa� 0 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 3 4 5 34 � 19 I � � R 18 94 �, �, �, N 12113 — �,� �,_� _� �_� � —d— —— ———- — M — — — — — — — — - 1�2083 v U v v v v v � u� � � O m O O O O O O O O O N N N � � ZO�J N N N N N N N N N N —�— 38 181 r 1206 AVE. / a 35 12092 �� LMP 5692 � 6 I 12091 P 83237 — � � 172o�y � 1 0 � 8� 1 o i2oss 120�� o � v N o 12052 � � �6 izo�o N 9�2oa5 �2oao a M N 7�� 36 m � 12�6� �� 12035 7 � � � 12073 � � � o� � 15 �2o6g 4 izoso3 0o N�2o3a � 48 12065 � a� � 1�065�// 013 12 � 5 izoze � izozo 2 a� 1 ��'29 6 \\�R��S2 N w� 14 a^ LM 5691 � 6�2oi5 R t2oio � 12031 �zoiz ��98 I �� 1 10 � �. w rn � DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD `O � o a 49 i2iio - � Q^ � i2o�a � 12068 12058 P MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 7044-2013 Map No. 873 From: Institutional To: Urban Residential N 1:2,500 APPENDIX C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 6924 - 2012 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. 2 3 L! This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6924 - 2012." Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot C District Lot 241 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan EPP30995 Lot D District Lot 241 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan EPP30995 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No.1569 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District). A portion of the parcel or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot B District Lot 241 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan EPP30995 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No.1569 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to P-2 (Special Institutional). Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 22nd day of May, A.D. 2012. READ a second time the PUBLIC HEARING held the READ a third time the day of day of day of APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this RECONSIDEREDAND FINALLYADOPTED, the , A.D. 20 . , A. D. 20 . , A. D. 20 . day of , A.D. 20 . day of , A. D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER L 122b9 N I � y y y u�Oi m n �m rn °�' � in � o 0 12245 m ��vir ILYLV ,as 13 � N o 0 0 o Ng N8 N7 N6 N5 N4 N 9 N10 N11 20 �19 0 �15 14� N13 � LM 1593 P� 15 I�16 �7L �1594 MP 510 LM 277 4 1 426 12 35 N o o N LM 351 8 12 13 14 15 21m �22 N 16 67 p� E�1F�, G� H� ��N10 �11 �12�130140 0 0 0 �o � �22P��MP� � 26 C M � O�j � � � � O O � N N N N N N N N � � �ZZ3� N N N ry O O N N N N � ZYN 2J �ZZZJ 122AVE. 23 � LM 124 6 27 0 0 1N 2� NN M� �� KN �N N LMP 0897 P 18526 M LM 272 9 � 1 � 2 m 3�, 4N 5� 6 � 7m 8�, 9N N r m m rn o o c� M � � � a a a a a a N N N N N N N N N � J 1216 AVE. 1215o BCP 41029 � EPP 32529 A EPP 32528 /EPP 32518 EPP 30995 _ EP 80908 EP 23007 � — — � — — -����= EP 69207 I LMP 1280 P 41572 � 45 � I 12122 � P 41572 � 44 P 22101 Rem 1 EPP 3 95 12170 2P 69729 � — — — � B �EPP 31930 iziao EPP 30995 12116 D EPP 30 95 LMP 578 1 i22oa � 12194 � � 0 P 54677 12�80 46 12166 12150 12209 12138 i2i2a �2»p 2o i— IYUCU N LM 569 37 �koa� 0 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 3 4 5 34 � 19 I � � R 18 94 �, �, �, N 12113 — �,� �,_� _� �_� � —d— —— ———- — M — — — — — — — — - 1�2083 v U v v v v v � u� � � O m O O O O O O O O O N N N � � ZO�J N N N N N N N N N N —�— 38 181 r 1206 AVE. / a 35 12092 �� LMP 5692 � 6 I 12091 P 83237 — � � 172o�y � 1 0 � 8� 1 o i2oss 120�� o � v N o 12052 � � �6 izo�o N 9�2oa5 �2oao a M N 7�� 36 m � 12�6� �� 12035 7 � � � 12073 � � � o� � 15 �2o6g 4 izoso3 0o N�2o3a � 48 12065 � a� � 1�065�// 013 12 � 5 izoze � izozo 2 a� 1 ��'29 6 \\�R��S2 N w� 14 a^ LM 5691 � 6�2oi5 R t2oio � 12031 �zoiz ��98 I �� 1 10 � �. w rn � DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD `O � o a 49 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6924-2012 Map No. 1569 From: P-2 (Special Institutional) and R-1 (Residential District) To: � R-1 (Residential District) � P-2 (Special Institutional) i2iio - � Q^ � i2o�a � 12068 12058 P N SCALE 1:2,500 APPENDIX D CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 6924-2012 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. 2. r� This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6924-2012," Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Parcel "2" (Reference Plan 17121) of Parcel "B" (Reference Plan 16630) Lot 1 District Lot 241 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 4921 Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 11166) Lot 1 Except: Firstly: Parcel B(Explanatory Plan 16630) and Secondly: Part subdivided by Plan 69727, District Lot 241 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 4921 Lot 1 District Lot 241 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 69727 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No.1569 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R-1(Residential District). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the PUBLIC HEARING held the READ a third time the day of day of day of APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the , A.D. 20 . , A.D. 20 , A.D. 20 day of day of , A.D. 20 , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER MAP�E RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6924-2012 Map No. 1569 From: P-2 (Special Institutional) R-1 To: Q R-1 (Residential District) �;� �.:.n"s ' IP�,V,�>1r�I�I� I�tIII _= i�i�:lik9i.fti�il�i�� (Residential District) � P-2 (Special Institutional) N SCALE 1:2,500 . ,� ,LL,Y --_ : ��� �1802� APPENDIX F i 2�7 46 . .9.6 . . . . _ .,1X.:J . . . . . . . . . . . . . � a .. �. _ . _ .1� 112.17 --. ........ ......... .. ..�..... ...._. .. � -- - ..... I I il '�,�'i i8.00 - ., . ; ' ��„ �. : _. � � � - —�--�. ` �_ _ _ .: , � o:^ . o . �� a � , ; � ,, - TM � �.:'_^ - � .u` � � 3T4.7,m � �. � 7 { oy, $ :o �' ' -, - � 89_ 4 m ' " �" ``�'' . � � ; - ., `�' [ ? `yi 435.1 m2 ' �, ry �.�.s ^ � :_ _ ' .�._:_ , • - � _ ` - - . . . . . � � o ^ � , �o �' �-_ - - -,�,,..�....:�-�w..�---yp •'. ! �, i L `;O'c� ' � t • . , , . �- . . ,� , _� - : _-- _, __._ : , � ' ` � � ` �„ _ � „ „� , o 'i� � �; 20. 46 • • . . 96.38 � . .o G f • `� 3T6. 0 m2 �� 76.37 22.03 � . . , r�°� � � ,: ; . r.. ^o �, ., � <. , . o�% /`�' ... r8� : �__: �,- ; �_ _ v�,. J _ � -•. __ � `�� _ , _ .. _ � � � �� � ,.� ,� `,-_-.,-� . c ,.,. ` .:-:, � 1(�� � � .. oo� � o � t t �� � ; g�- �, � , ' �'� .\� „����-� � _ ` � . - ����.� �-_ �'`�'��;='- ,-� 371.2 m2 �� 412.5 m2'. �` ; I � � �-� _ SCALE 1 : 500 ,�"P� � ; �, a��...�:..��' - ��`�"� �_ ' • ;" o z5 � — ,�$6 i � _� � 16' S7 ; �1.6 i,. � �800 "� .._.._..._ � � „�� �, 3x� �. .�� � ry SHEET SIZE.• 17" X 22" ��..:_ � � d!f �.; o ��� � �����...::. �����DECEIvfBER �9, 20�2 ��� ��- � 103 1600 vvest 6 ��A� ���oo� --.--a-----a--_ � ��n� - -��. � � v� �o��c� � v6j 1 ���f��1L �_� _. .;_n �� N .. ..: �0.30� . .. .� . �.. fm 6�9-3�� . . �,� ..3X3 ......._.... . ....... ... :.. . � -_, ��A� � _ _ . : � _ �, ... - �:.. / � �- � � i o o� � �> rr , �, �� ..��� � � ' o � .- . . j ' � �'"j ;.� � _ ./I Q � ' . - . " � �7 � �p�J m� " � � � ,. -.000�� � DENDTES R-2 LOTS � � <-- ----= - �-- , � % � .- �o� Q �� BALANCE R-1 LOTS � 5�0.6 m�2 `� � � �� . � � . 16.2.� ' ,.rt�:. .�.,:� :` , o �w w o �_�_., ._:__,....- r-- ----�.�----- � �.�. y cn o P 1 B,3 � o `" � J � (�1! � �i � ; . - -r o ,�' o - - _ . � _ .. ��� `�(' �Pvf�cc-l� �. �, ---�� a� _ ; o -- -- — --I a' . T �= - - -. - Qo �" _�`�'' !�-� � `� . - - . •'' � � ti o 20.00 . . . . . . _ _ . . .. _ __�... _ .-` �. ......... ..... ..............� -- _._ , ...,,,,::::: �. .... ....�:'.�u'. ...? - 25.aQ ... ..�. .,. _ � . � � �� � °,-. �, �..� - : - , ' � ' - � 408.2 m2 .�_ .,,�,r -- ; " . A ` __ r0. S m2 ii N Q' �' �� o o � — _ _ __ _ _ „�: _...-°' Q�.� ^ ! 389.5 m2 " �Of3 ;:3�' � " .�, _._ �27�-� a.._.— � r._.. �� kZ I . �d°) _ _: _ '- � � __ _ ,� N ,� � � . � Q,� : � --> : 26:3� � �•`10550�� � _-- �� � � �" _.. .. � ���L � . : _> I _., 408.3 m2 _ � oo � :iv 492.3 m2 w � . � .��. �� o `- �` � vi " �i ��'' I `:" F� : ." . ___ 40�.? m2 " `: 25.00 21.891 1&.000 _ 26.94__ ll. � District of Maple Ridge T0: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer DATE: FILE N0: ATTN: SUBJECT: First, Second and Third Reading Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 7060-2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The following resolution was passed at the May 24, 2011 Council meeting: January 20, 2014 2013-102-CP CofW That staff be directed to bring back a housekeeping amendment bylaw to correct the discrepancies between the Schedule 8 map, the figure maps in Appendix E and the Schedule C map and any further housekeeping items that are required. On November 26, 2013, Official Community Plan Revision Bylaw No. 7034-2013 was adopted. This bylaw allows Council to make minor amendments to the Official Community Plan Bylaw, which includes: • Correcting mapping errors - specifically Schedule "C", Natural Feature Map; • Correcting clerical, grammatical and typographical errors; • Updating name changes (such as the GVRD to Metro Vancouver); and • Updating references to projects that have been completed. The Revision Bylaw also allows changes to be made to the document format and layout, logos, diagrams, etc. This work has also been undertaken to update the document to current corporate branding standards. The next step in this process is to adopt the minor revisions made to the Official Community Plan through an Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw. The attached bylaw was drafted by the District's solicitor and includes certification from the Manager of Legislative Services that states the revisions made to the Official Community Plan are in accordance with Official Community Plan Revision Bylaw No. 7034-2013. RECOMMENDATION: That Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 7060-2014 be given First, Second, and Third Readings. 1105 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: On November 26, 2013, Council adopted Official Community Plan Revision Bylaw No. 7034-2013. This Bylaw was prepared upon the advice of the District's solicitor and in accordance with Section 140 of the Community Charter, as discussed in the November 4, 2013 Council report. Recognizing the administrative nature of these changes, the Revision Bylaw provides for a simplified adoption process. The next step in the process for making minor revisions to the Official Community Plan is to grant Three Readings to Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 7060-2014. This was also discussed in the November 4, 2013 Council report. The proposed Bylaw and attached Official Community Plan will be posted online for viewing and comment. The Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw states that the document has been revised in accordance with the OCP Revision Bylaw, which has been certified by the Manager of Legislative Services verifying compliance with the OCP Revision Bylaw (see Schedule A to the OCP Adoption Bylaw). Early in the review process, the following were identified for amending: • Urban Area Boundary: Correct mapping error on Schedule C, Natural Features Map, to include Thornhill in the Urban Area Boundary, as shown on Schedule B. • References to Outdated Titles: There are many references in the existing Official Community Plan to the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD), which is now referred to as Metro Vancouver. • Completed Studies: The Official Community Plan includes a commitment to undertake a number of studies that have since been completed. For example, studies such as the Agricultural Plan, Detached Garden Suites, and Urban Area Boundary review have been done and an update to the language is warranted. • Corporate Branding: The District logo and corporate branding style have changed since the adoption of the Official Community Plan document. The amendments will include changing the layout to align with the District's new corporate branding standard. b) Project Description: The changes made to the Official Community Plan primarily encompass the list, discussed above, that was identified prior to beginning a full review of revisions. After a thorough review, the following changes are now proposed: • Clerical, grammatical and typographical errors: These have been amended throughout the document. • Mapping: This includes an adjustment on Schedule C, Natural Features Map, to include Thornhill in the Urban Area Boundary (as shown on Schedule B) and also includes mapping adjustments that have occurred through the development application process. Additionally, the starred properties symbols have been removed from Schedule B. The star symbols -2- referred to a Metro Vancouver land-use review process for these starred properties, which terminated with the adoption of the Regional Growth Strategy. • Completed Projects: References made to projects to be completed have been updated with some wording to clarify that the project has been completed and is now being maintained or there is ongoing implementation, or where appropriate, references to projects now completed have been deleted. For example, updated wording was provided for the Agricultural Plan, Garden Suites, and the Town Centre Area Plan, whereas deleted references include the "GVRD Green Zone", which is no longer used by Metro Vancouver as a land use designation and the definition of a"Density Transfer", which is no longer a specific policy of the Albion Area Plan since the recent Council adoption of the Community Amenity Contribution program. • Corporate Branding: The new layout of the Official Community Plan is designed to align more closely with the current corporate branding standard, utilize the updated District logo, and update the photos throughout the document. Currently, there are a number of projects underway that are anticipated to result in Official Community Plan policy amendments in the near future (i.e., Commercial and Industrial Strategy, Transportation Plan, Housing Action Plan, and Environmental Management Strategy), which will fall under the Local Government Act requirements, specifically for public consultation and a public hearing (S. 879 and 890 respectively). As such, no updates were made to recently completed work specifically related to any of these projects, as the existing policy language and intent will be reviewed and updated through each project's process and implementation. c) Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw: The Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is attached to this report, along with the proposed minor amendments to the Official Community Plan document. Staff have continued to work with the District's solicitor while making the amendments to the Official Community Plan document. The Manager of Legislative Services has reviewed the changes and executed Schedule A of the OCP Adoption Bylaw, certifying that the proposed amendments align with OCP Revision Bylaw No. 7034-2013. The passing of OCP Revision Bylaw No. 7034-2013 permits the OCP Adoption Bylaw to receive Three Readings in one Council meeting and a Final Reading at the subsequent Council meeting. CONCLUSION: A resolution directing staff to undertake housekeeping amendments on the Official Community Plan was passed by Council in May 2011. The OCP Revision Bylaw, adopted by Council in November 2013, is an effective tool for fixing minor errors and maintaining information so that it is clear and easily understood by the community. Because the process is efficient and expedient, future minor revisions may occur on a more frequent basis, with less expense and time involved. -3- It is recommended that Bylaw 7060-2014 be granted First, Second, and Third Reading. "Original signed by Lisa Zosiak" Prepared by: Lisa Zosiak Planner "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA. P.Eng GM Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A- Official Community Plan Adoption Bylaw No. 7060-2014 -4- Appendix A CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0. 7060-2014 A bylaw to adopt a revised Official Community Plan WHEREAS the Council has adopted and subsequently amended Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 6425-2006, and WHEREAS the Council adopted Official Community Plan Revision Bylaw No. 7034-2013 to authorize the revision of the Official Community Plan pursuant to s. 140 of the Community Charter and the Bylaw Revision Regulation; and WHEREAS District staff have revised the Official Community Plan and the Corporate Officer has certified that the Official Community Plan has been revised in accordance with Bylaw No. 7034- 2013; and WHEREAS an Official Community Plan revised pursuant to s. 140 of the Community Charter and the Bylaw Revision Regulation and adopted by the Council is deemed to have been adopted as if all requirements respecting the approval and adoption of its provisions have been met, including consultation, notification and public hearing requirements. NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. This bylaw may be cited as "Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014". 2. The Official Community Plan attached to and forming part of this bylaw as Schedule A is adopted as the Official Community Plan of the District of Maple Ridge, effective as of the date of adoption of this bylaw. READ a first time the READ a second time the READ a third time the ADOPTED, the day of day of day of day of , 20 , 20 , 20 , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER SCHEDULE A I certify that the Official Community Plan contained in this Schedule has been revised in accordance with Official Community Plan Revision Bylaw No. 70342013. Corporate Officer [attached revised OCP] � � District of Maple Ridge T0: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Development Permit 11185 240 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: January 20, 2014 FILE N0: 2012-021-DP MEETING: C of W Development Permit application 2012-021-DP has been received in conjunction with rezoning application 2011-084-RZ. This application rezones a larger site to a number of zones, and specifically zones a portion of the subject site at the southwest corner of 240 Street and 112 Avenue to C-1 Neighbourhood Commercial for a two storey mixed-use commercial/residential project. This development permit application is subject to the Commercial Development Permit Area Guidelines in Section 8.5 of the Official Community Plan. The associated rezoning application and design proposal was revised after land ownership changed. Consequently, the rezoning bylaw already at third reading, was required to be rescinded, modified and scheduled for a new Public Hearing. Council granted first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6853-2011 on August 30, 2011. Council granted first and second readings for site specific text Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6947- 2012 and Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6875-2011 on October 9, 2011. Third reading was granted to the OCP Bylaw on November 20, 2012. On July 23, 2013, Council granted amended second readings for the two rezoning bylaws. On August 27, 2013, Council held the new Public Hearing and granted third reading to the two amended rezone amending bylaws. Council will be considering final reading for rezoning application 011-084-RZ on January 28, 2014. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-021-DP respecting property located at 11185 240 Street. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Damax Consultants Ltd. (David Laird) Qualico Developments (Vancouver) Inc. (Inc. No. A26101) Lot "C" District Lot 404 Group 1 NWP19825 Commercial and Urban Residential 1106 Zoning: Proposed: Commercial and Urban Residential Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RST (Street Townhouse Residential), R-2 (Urban Residential District), R-1(Residential District), and C-1(Neighbourhood Commercial) Surrounding Uses North: South East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Concurrent Applications: b) Project Description: Single Family Residential, Neighborhood Commercial and Townhouse RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), C-1(Neighbourhood Commercial) and RM-1(Townhouse Residential) Commercial and Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Medium Density Residential, Neighbourhood Commercial and Conservation Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Urban Residential and Conservation Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 1.576 Ha. (3.89 Acres) 112 Avenue and 240 Street Full Urban Standard 2011-084-RZ and 2012-020-VP This development permit application applies to a portion of a larger project, involving the zoning of the subject site located at 11185 240 Street and 11133 240 Street. These two properties are being rezoned from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to the following zo n es: • RST (Street Townhouse Residential) for townhouses facing 112 Avenue and 240 Street; • R-1 (Residential District) for a small portion of the site to be compatible with lands to the south and the west; • R-2 (Urban Residential District) for the interior portion of the site; and • C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) for the proposed mixed-use buildings at the corner, which is subject to this development permit. This rezoning would permit subdivision into 24 RST (Street Townhouse Residential) lots and one duplex lot, 39 R-2 (Urban Residential District) single family lots, one remnant R-1 lot to be subdivided when lands to the south along 111 Avenue are developed, and one (1) commercial property with two rental units on the second level of the proposed mixed-use building. -2- This development permit applies to the proposed C-1 Neighbourhood Commercial mixed-use building. The proposal is for a two (2) storey building with commercial uses on thye first floor and rental residential dwellings on the second floor. The proposed building is located at and oriented to the corner of 112 Avenue and 240 Street and incorporates a pedestrian friendly design with a strong presence to the streets. The siting of the building will require setback variances which is the subject of a separate report. The building area for the proposal will be 702.48 sq. m. (7561 sq. ft.). The ground level commercial floor area totals 481.1 sq. m. (5,178 sq. ft.) and the second level residential floor area totals 221.38 sq. m. (2,383 sq. ft.). There will be 2 two bedroom dwelling units, having an area of 105.63 sq. m. (1137 sq. ft.) and 115.75 sq. m. (1246 sq. ft.). Each unit will have 2 parking spaces, and will be reached by way of separate staircases from each unit to grade. The parking lot is in an L-shaped paved and landscaped area south and west of the building. Vehicle access is by way of 240 Street and the rear lane. There will be 21 space provided - 4 spaces reserved as residential parking, 1 as a visitor parking space, and 16 commercial parking spaces, including one space for the disabled. The parking for the residential uses will be signed, have special surFace treatment and be landscaped to distinguish them from the commercial parking spaces. Garbage and recycling will be contained and sheltered in a structure borrowing design features from the mixed-use building. Landscaping is provided to buffer the street-oriented townhousing to the west and south. c) Planning Analysis: The Official Community Plan designates the site Commercial and Urban Residential, and the proposed mixed-use commercial/residential development is subject to the Commercial Development Permit Area Guidelines in Section 8.5 of the Official Community Plan. The applicable key guideline concepts for Commercial Areas are as follows: 1. Avoid conflicts with adjacent uses through sound attenuation, appropriate lighting, landscaping, traffic calming and the transition of building massing to fit with adjacent development. This guideline is achieved as follows: • The mixed-use commercial/residential building is located in the northeast corner at furthest distance from adjacent residential development. • Night sky friendly lighting proposed with reduced beam spread to avoid light spillover • Plantings and landscape buffers are provided between the subject property and adjacent residential development. • The stepped 2-storey building massing matches the scale of adjacent residential development. 2. Encourage a pedestrian scale through providing outdoor amenities, minimizing the visual impact of parking areas, creating landmarks and visual interest along street fronts. This guideline is achieved as follows: • Extended roof canopies with brick pilasters and wood supports provide weather protection for pedestrians and bring roof level down to a pedestrian scale. -3- • The vehicle parking area is located at the rear of site and is screened from sidewalks. • The corner entry with a gable roof is defining element at corner of 240 Street and 112th Avenue. • The stepped sidewalk and planters add visual interest at the driveway access into site. 3. Promote sustainable development with multimodal transportation circulation, and low impact building design. Development in the vicinity of 112 Avenue and 240 Street, both of which are identified on the Major Corridor Network Plan, are resulting in increased density. This will generate pedestrian traffic to access the services to be established at this commercial node. 4. Respect the need for private areas in mixed use development and adjacent residential areas. This guideline is achieved as follows: • A private covered deck provided at each residential unit is located to face 112 Avenue. • The main living areas face onto streets, respecting privacy of neighbouring residential development. 5. The form and treatment of new buildings should reflect the desired character and pattern of development in the area by incorporating appropriate architectural styles, features, materials, proportions and building articulation. This guideline is achieved as follows: • The building scale and massing at a maximum of 2-storeys in height and sloped gable roof is consistent with design of adjacent residential development. • The covered walkways complement porches of the adjacent development. • The cementitious siding, brick veneer, and wood detailing at walkways is consistent with adjacent development. • The building is articulated at ground floor with columns to define potential commercial retail unit spaces. This articulation is of a scale similar to dwelling units of the adjacent residential component. • The design of the exterior of second floor residential units is of a scale consistent with neighbouring development. d) Advisory Design Panel: Plans, design drawings and landscaping plans submitted in support of development permit application were reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel at their September 10, 2013 meeting. The following are the comments from the ADP and the applicant's response: • Consider using the roof brackets at the corner of roof feature. - Existing design proposed to remain as is as corner feature is to read as separate visual element from wings at either side of corner element. • Provide a pathway access to PMT (e.g. Hydro kiosk on 112 Avenue). - Stepping stone pathway provided. '� • Provide backup space at north end of the parking area. - Provided. • Consider adding gables on the roof line. - Gable added to second floor roof at north elevation. • Consider carrying the brick columns around the main corner feature. - Elevation retained as per original design as scale of brick columns would appear in conflict with massing of corner element. Brick columns have been revised at south elevation to wrap around corners of building. • Consider grouping residential entries together (stairs). - Entries retained in original locations to retain suite configuration and appropriate room orientation. • Provide details for architectural concrete treatment. - Scoreline/pattern added to elevations at east foundation wall. • Show the location of the electrical room. - Electrical room and sprinkler room added to plans and elevations have been revised accordingly. • Consider planters or details of architectural treatments along the sidewalk at the southeast driveway. - Planters added adjacent to steps at sidewalk. • Consider sign band along rear of commercial building. - Signbands added to south and west elevations. • Provide details of the roof brackets. - Proposed detail added to drawing A3.02. • Consider concrete pedestals for brick columns. - 8" high pedestal added at each column location. • Provide details for grades along hard landscape areas. - Provided. • Clarify the sidewalk/landscape treatment along the east wall. - Planting and decorative pavers aligning with columns added at east elevation. • Consider using pavers between property line and building (north and east). - Additional pavers added aligning with column locations to reduce amount of continuous concrete walkway. • Consider wheel-stop provision along the west bank of parking to match others proposed. - Wheel stops were added at the west parking stalls. • Look at sight lines along the fence line for vehicle entry from the lane. - Fence height reduced to 3' for a distance of 15' feet to increase visibility. • Consider deletion of one of the brick pilasters where they are grouped together. - Paired concrete columns replaced by single column at north and south elevations respectively. -5- • Consider more accessible bike parking areas. - Bicycle parking was shifted north adjacent to the sidewalk. e) Financiallmplications: In accordance with Council's Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of the estimated landscape cost will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on an estimated landscape cost of $32,355.24, the security will be $32,355.24. CONCLUSION: This proposal will result in an attractive commercial-residential building, with distinctive corner massing and treatment, as well as a strong relationship to the grade along the street fronts to encourage convenient pedestrian access to the future stores from the sidewalks. As the development proposal complies with the Commercial Development Permit Guidelines of the Official Community Plan for form and character, it is recommended that 2012-021-DP be given favorable consideration. "Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski" Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP Planner "Original signed by Charles R. Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Architectural Plans Appendix C - Landscaping Plans � N District of Langley � 11185 240 STREET 0 .� � � o �t CORPORATION OF �� THE DISTRICT OF � - � MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Scale: 1:2,500 � `� ��, _�`�- L--� 1--�° �'� DATE: Dec 5, 2013 FILE: 2012-021-VP BY: PC 112th AVENUE � PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 11185 AND 11133 240TH ST, DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Ankenman Associates Architects Inc. APPENDIX B1 SYNOPSIS zoNiNc CNIC ADDRE55 LEGAL DESCRIPTION $ITE AREA SITE COVERAGE FLOOR AREA FLOOR AREA RATIO � ,oz nzao�� —_ MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT �J,J eawurn�e��ow�, Mu,o,zm W PARKING REQUIREMENTS � e�.u�sui.e x �� � $ETBACKS ' (,%� rvozn� . �� ., a . , S. _ m ... . �eocear�owexxoov � Ersr . m . ac , O. m _e ocEOF�owErereoor �} �,��arvra�u. .��..., � . .. V Na�m�v9Fn,.�.�o.o�E.�A�� a� SITE PLAN APPENDIX B2 0 .� :� £ ,� s �� I1FffP_ EL�G6� G,.,L'�1 's�=Ay':�,.�, �s-r-� '; � .���:�t rT;� �n� .:t� ___��.,�.�,� Unit 1 - I - - ',�'. �`� � r�e Unit 2 �a�.-. . . � �� � �,. � � , -. — - _. � � ; ti � � �a+,w.. ^'==v.s.r��. . a � �w.a. i __ m�,J.� �... ___l� ���1��. C.it3^w LL`.LSA�r GL_nAC+.� �i II.dR.,. ,.�,�, � _�:_� r.n�� '4 : I ' � ..,. . � � .�. � '��a�e: . ,. �� � � .. �r � n-� �' : I �q. :e P e�meS . I I �'�-- �.��$..Y;K„w .�. . � �_� . � F �.'�•x ��:•:0.�c ��� ... .�...�' . `� . ,,;,`t�✓ . .. . ti. �.� ._. � :._ . .I . . . . .... I ...: ... L—_—__________'_____ --_—___� ...uarcdcm»,+�w '! ' _ uv�.s�vi '.,,�w�a:. � � _. � I :L. _ _ — � F ��.m ar...u..�.e.e g ^ .. _' �— --�---------I-- -� �.�� ',. �n,s.i ; � c+� �.�°a , '----------' � � ,� � .aa _�a �' �:'. PZ��E���EI� j`�1U'��'T� �.��� L�E'��`EL�F'��'tEG'�lT 7�a��.��:0�7-������-�o��. ��rRa���Fr�t°.�r��ia�E F���e�P�.r�� y��� � t�� .�,.ri€�eeam:�.�,ssr��F:3tQs �ae�uf:uezzs Cnc_ z�--r.� �,-��,. 3 SIGNBAND DETAIL 3.o s�,,�E. , ,;����-, �, - - -- --- -�.� ��-����.���s - ----- - � NORTH ELEVATION 3-01 sc�.�E_ iB"=�,—o. 3.01 su�[- i/e.=i�_o. ��� � `;"`;;;'; "" ' PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 11185 AND 11133 240TH ST, DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Ankenman Associates Architects Inc. _� _ �: APPENDIX B3 ELEVATIONS v8._, -0 0 � 0 0 0� � � 0 ��� 1309 q3 .01 OCT 23, 20"13 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 3.0 scn�E�. iis = i�-o. �.�,,.�.�,,.�.,,�.�o,,.�.�,,,�.�..��,,.�.,��,.��,,,�.�,�::��,�:. � _�_ _ _ _ � Z WEST ELEVATION I � 3.0 scn�E�. �ia = i o � — � .�i�...� �3� PRELIM. BRACKET DETAIL i.o U�E_ -��, �� '� PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 11185 AND 11133 240TH ST, DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Ankenman Associates Architects Inc. APPENDIX B4 � � � n,..�..,�. � �. o ��. � . �. M... m.,,.,.,.,. �..,,,.R ��.�. � ,�`���w� rvnmm � :f� � , �,�.o���„A�,.,�..��, ,,.�..,,,�o�...�,�... ...............�,.,, �:„,:..,....�,....�,�.�,...», �fo,.w„�.�w.�...��»,�r,�� � ,,,.� _ ���.� � ... ,�.. ��.�.,�.w.� � w..�.��..,..�w�u,.�,�„w � `�m.,..„..,,,.�..�,.�, ELEVATIONS 1309 �2.0� J �/8'•=�'_0" OCT23,20�3 �� �.,. i'\��;�;::.; _�. /�— � _..�n�����9.��":!�'�.!'�!�".�9::��:!�� o�aN�a���rura��{r��a :����:�,m�m:�:.� �<<°-��-m ., �������r���ti�'�i�d�,�i����:� ym����'�m�i ��C�im�4.',�d,�G„� .� -88R�'8f7M1IN�TBTAdhll' Z,1M�lI8�R�dM1�i1N�TdTRSV�.IN�I�dR�Y��BTT�dIN��7 �I� CI'.Sh ,CVLCiLdI H.�Ctiy�CL' LI95 iV.LLLdl95��� �V�'itL5s4 N L!L �I�� �I'.v I�I.�`:"��!'.x."..:�.�' �I� � ' ��''��� I:��.I:� �� � -� ,� � � �"�oo � � � �� � � APPENDIX B5 ---_- -- -- - -- � --__=- _-- �� � I � II - , I���� I. '•�.f �.,i — �.� � . . � � — —�_ � PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 11185 AND 11133 240TH ST, DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE STREETSCAPE Ankenman Associates Architects Inc. ir�z°=,�-0° 0� � - � � � 0� � o� ■ �� m 1309 ,[� `Z . 0 � / \ ..1 OCT 23, 2013 PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Ankenman Associates Architects Inc. 12321 BccchcrSt,Gcsccn[Bwch,6C V4A3A� GU4.53G.�600 �� �� � �FLOOR PLAN s.o�i s�,�r , 3 —,�-0. y� 3 WEST ELEVATION 5.0� sr �e, ,;, —,�-0 �� , �5 EAST ELEVATION _ s.oi scn�e- ,i4 =,�.a. �� ��w,, .,.� ,�a. �SECTION 5.01 sr�.�e iia°=��-0^ APPENDIX B6 11185 AND 11133 240TH ST, DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE GARBAGE ENCLOSURE 1309 �� .�� va^—i�-o�� ocrzs,zois :i�.!; �•'i +_� �a••'=�� :;. �'in� :fi'� 'a` - '=' a�� �'>, ',-s ��� � . . i � * . , � � . � � • ..1 •. � �� ■ � � �� �� � �'� i � � � . � �� �Ir I�� ■■- �� � � ������ � '� s i No�owr.wrr�sru��wertrno+��s 3 xic� ra�i��srri.ursxir;c� � SI�IF1�{E'dPO560 R�F asiuiu�4E!'IL]�EOL#iS81LlEFIEQOk1 -- � �+owxow�ruarirls�auEo €�avrmo4.s 5lphG {a'IXF45� F3k€EI nswuur�FA�6�EHC-t27 E.7�'hY[1FRG�E4 3 FiOQJ�MWlY IN5T.iLL��ffI716L15 s�or�c [�'�aEo ru4 eslyWlhElAo�7ff H[-5e r.rr�r�ar: �dC1€ S JAAlICr.S1 h�l�,iER14L 6A10[ V949EY FOYF5r8LETl7 fi BUI1T�1� W406 FkSCLA RL1�riM�MF jd�� J�{�_76{ �[�jy f�FY � ►r.m �►TMoaw,,�a�a¢ FxaxE K� c WJ�ETIDSiTO iL1TC#! AU�ACEYTSIOL4G 8d'1570E WIFi[�OW/a36RT16M QC.OLOi.£ 3€} i5sid41 �46yk�'!S i1�JGj I'f���'���EI� ��I�EE� L��E L3E�EL�J1'���EN-i- .�,nkr��7�rrr�;? ;1ti�ari,7lc�� ;�rs E7ire.rt; Inr_ , � �,3 S ��� ra] �nti ti;� � ��� , . APPENDIX 67 lIVQi ll{•.� �n 4 LLI:i � _ ,�.,k, „�� ��. . m.tm� �-•+ . �:��. � R.lin�i.k �ni�., oocinrK� . .,���, :� � . axuL::K o- �� � ,s,onuc.�i i� � 9 4^ wl �Fwlho65v+noo R T¢9�i . y 3 �1E�C 3fA1� flON�EfE i�7AlNHG 4Y6W.' rrex rx�o 74 7L10�#l,�YCBJT iIdHLJ FOL1M6A71O�4 �'W .�aeunser iCLL WNSH Y O 1HEID4lUlY 8A4kEhl ALL1hYh5ah1370NE �� G005E M1E€IC LIG HT1hIG FflQ s�eoni x�woow �e {eu€p cw azuonac s�c�e {w s�n �J�E fJ 11VY. 11 �naa exn€�r ��aas €Ero� Y 5 cun�n K+oao eur�rwc 9cf+« 1; 3 NhTIJR,4.} PDR ROFJF Ci1:4FY �� WRH 3411U5MaODELCrOCAT &Y5E OF BRd€hET i€4LOUC 74 �YL�CF! A�YCB'IT31�L4Lj Y Z 1�' I�T.LL CSLUahEl IBL�Oii �tiY 1$ WJLL! LJGFff iCOL6UR 7{] hl57CR NiMUO44 �; {OIA0F:7,1TONh1ET,7i{FW�1+191'PI.EVGL4SS R��{�y NBaN €4.T LEffEAf��JG 501EN'6'}'} 70 E W I� WG 6Y� Wr Siff1 nv arrr�c i..— � ;:�=.-��y-- � � ,,. • -'- ... . . . i�1185 A�'�Q 1�I S 33 ��OTH ST� �IS�RI�T C3F M°tiPLE RIDGE �OLO�•1� I�C}r�,F�U 13�1�3 ��.�� :��. .,, ,�,,,, _�,,, APPENDIX C �� =��.�E �a�M���e er��TM P�EA� n �a� ��Msn�,� s� 6 .��oEM��s= �M E��o�E��EOAR �SM�.e,e $ �� PE����nM o��.� xE� o�E�.� F�.a� �Ax .� Po. 8 ALL PLANT MATERIAL MUST BE PROVIDEO FROM CERTIFIEO OISEASE FREE NURSERY. PROVIOE CERTIFICATION UPON REpUEST. SreFFr r.ecFs os PFe FA6U5 SYL�/ATIGA I I � L� / \ V V �J � �aN�SCkPE �RCHITECI�HE 1811 Falcon Drive Coquitlam, British Columbla V3E 2Q Tel: 604.941.5268 Fax: 604.4343088 � MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Frnana+ear� tt185 AND ttA?3 240TH ST MAPLE RIDOE LANDSCAPE PLAN s�,� _ � � oF a M1�APao�E�.H�MaEa. �-oaa �I .j��r�rE �,Hs. I ��� �fr. I. �R�R v oxho A.� cmnre 1 5' HT. WOOD FENCE L2 s�a-�o I la a9�1 cr wix. e o. ��,�",��—� — — sE�„o� �E�� � — _� 2 3'-6" PICKET FENCE L2 �',b iso i� `oiA�Fa �ooi exPcsmro�wnFosrc�z Essanncri �3 TYPICAL DECIDUOUS TREE DETAIL L2 "„ CHCW1 �—�w �S .A ' . `. ` "" '__" '__'" 5 LIGHTING SPECIFICATION L2 r�c R¢^yy�? '^��,=h'��.ic�P' c`X?Rn� / — . �.�'or.�y� � � _.�,���� x �� �.��o�� epawiu� rv�o�. n�orvs w.�� nvicn� %41SECTION THROUGH STRUCTURAL SOIL (PARKING ISLAND) �z Nrs �aN�SCkPE �RCHITECI�HE 1811 Falcon Drive Coquitlam, British Columbia V3E 2Q Tel. 604.941.5268 Fax: 604.4343088 � MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT ��,.� mes an� mx+ zaoni sr MAPLE RDGE LANDSCAPE DETAILS _ �G OF 4 M�waaoiec.xuMeev. 73-U?4 T0: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Development Variance Permit 11185 240 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: January 20, 2014 FILE N0: 2012-021-DVP MEETING: CoW Development Variance Permit application 2012-021-DVP has been received in conjunction with rezoning application 2011-084-RZ. This application rezones a larger site to a number of zones, and specifically rezones a portion of the subject site at 11185 240 Street, located at the southwest corner of 240 Street and 112 Avenue to C-1 Neighbourhood Commercial for a two storey mixed-use commercial/residential project. The requested variances are to vary building height, setbacks to 112 Avenue and 240 Street and parking for the residential component. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2012-021-VP be approved. The associated rezoning application and design proposal was revised after land ownership changed. Consequently, the rezoning bylaw already at third, was required to be rescinded, modified and scheduled for a new Public Hearing. Council granted first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6853-2011 on August 30, 2011. Council granted first and second readings for site specific text Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6947-2012 and Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6875-2011 on October 9, 2011. Third reading was granted to the OCP Bylaw on November 20, 2012. On July 23, 2013, Council granted amended second readings for the two rezoning bylaws. On August 27, 2013, Council held the new Public Hearing and granted third reading to the two amended rezone amending bylaws. Council will be considering final reading for rezoning application 011-084-RZ on January 28, 2014. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-021-DVP respecting property located at 11185 240 Street. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: Damax Consultants Ltd. (Dave Laird) Qualico Developments (Vancouver) Inc. (Inc. No. A26101) Lot "C" District Lot 404 Group 1 NWP19825 1107 OCP: Existing: Commercial and Urban Residential Proposed: Commercial and Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RST (Street Townhouse Residential), R-2 (Urban Residential District), R-1(Residential District), and C-1(Neighbourhood Commercial) Surrounding Uses: North: South East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Single Family Residential, Neighbourhood Commercial and Townhouse RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), C-1(Neighbourhood Commercial) and RM-1(Townhouse Residential) Commercial and Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Medium Density Residential, Neighbourhood Commercial and Conservation Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Urban Residential and Conservation Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential, Rowhouse and Commercial with rental apartments on the second floor Site Area: 1.576 Ha. (3.89 Acres) Access: 112 Avenue, 240 Street and future lane access Servicing requirement: Full Urban Standard Concurrent Applications: 2011-084-RZ and 2012-021-DP b) Requested Variance: Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No 3510 -1985, Part 7, 701 Neighbourhood Commercial: C-1 is to be varied as follows: 1. Section 6. Size of Building and Structure - is varied by increasing the building height from 7.5 metres to 10.52 metres. 2. Section 7 Sitting, sub-section a) - is varied by reducing the front lot line setback from 7.5 metres to 0.46 metres, including projections. 3. Section 7 Sitting, d) - is varied by reducing the exterior side lot line setback from 7.5 metres to 0.43 metres, including projections. Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350 - 1990 is to be varied such that the requirement for the residential use shall be two (2) parking spaces for each dwelling unit plus one (1) parking space designated for visitors; these spaces are not required to be concealed and are required to be grouped in an areas close to the entrances of dwelling units they serve, surfaced with pavers, signed and landscaped. 2- c) Project Description: This variance applies to a portion of a larger project, involving the zoning of the subject property located at 11185 240 Street and the adjacent site at 11133 240 Street. These two properties are being rezoned from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RST (Street Townhouse Residential) to front 112 Avenue and 240 Street; R-1 (Residential District) for a small portion of the site to be compatible with lands to the south and the west; R-2 (Urban Residential District) for the interior portion of the site; and C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) for the subject site at the corner. This rezoning would permit subdivision into 24 RST (Street Townhouse Residential) lots, 39 R-2 (Urban Residential District) single family lots, one remnant R-1 lot to be subdivided when lands to the south along 111 Avenue are developed, and one (1) commercial property with two rental units on the second level of the proposed mixed-use building. This development variance permit application applies to the mixed-use building and is to vary height, setback and parking. d) Planning Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for single family development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. The applicant is proposing Council grant these there variances: Zoning Bylaw Variances: 1. Maximum Building Height Variance: To allow the mixed-use building height to be increasing from 7.5 metres to 10.52 metres. Justification: This variance is necessary to permit an aesthetically pleasing building form and roof style and convenient pedestrian/sidewalk access to storefront entrances on a lot that has sloping conditions. The proposed height would be compatible with the abutting the street-oriented townhouses to the west and south along 112 Avenue and 240 Street, respectively. Furthermore, the design elements for both the mixed use and street-oriented townhouse buildings will be similar, further enhancing compatibility. The height will comply with the new Zoning Bylaw when measurement will be to the top as opposed to currently being measured to the mid-point of the roof structure. 2. Minimum Setbacks: To reduce the front lot line setback from 7.5 metres to 0.46 metres, and the exterior side lot line setback from 7.5 metres to 0.43 metres, both including projections. Justification: This variance is to bring the commercial storefronts closer to the street. From a pedestrian perspective, this will enhance pedestrian accessibility to the future neighborhood commercial services. From a design perspective, it creates a more urban image, reflecting a similar reduction granted to the commercial project on the north side of 112 Avenue, and allows for a corner-oriented facade design element to be incorporated into the vocabulary of the building. 3- Parking Bylaw Variances: Parking requirements: The Parking and Loading Bylaw does not make provision for residential parking because the C-1 Neighbourhood Commercial Zone does not ordinarily permit residential uses. These units are being allowed through a site specific text amendment accompanies this application. Apartments associated with commercial uses in such zones as the C-2 Community Commercial or Service Commercial (CS-1) zones are one concealed space per dwelling unit. Concealed parking would be uneconomical for this small scale project. Therefore, in exchange for concealing the parking, the applicant agreed to increase the parking to two spaces plus 0.2 visitor spaces per unit for a total of 5 parking space. Furthermore, the 4 residential parking will be separated from the commercial parking and close to the unit entrances. The proposed variance is: the requirement for the residential use shall be two (2) parking spaces for each dwelling unit plus one (1) parking space designated for visitors; these spaces are not required to be concealed and are required to be grouped in an areas close to the entrances of dwelling units they serve, surfaced with pavers, signed and landscaped. Planning and Engineering support the approval of these zoning and parking variances. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed variances to the Zoning Bylaw and the Parking and Loading Bylaw is supported by the Planning and Engineering because it will allow for an attractive design which addresses the site's slope issues and allows for cost-effective provision of residential parking to serve future residents of the rental units. It is therefore recommended that this application be favourably considered and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Development Variance Permit 2012-021-DVP. "Ori inal si ned bv Adrian Kopystynski" Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP Planner "Original signed by Charles R. Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Ouinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original si ned by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B- Height and Setback Variance Diagrams 4- N District of Langley � 11185 240 STREET 0 .� � � o �t CORPORATION OF �� THE DISTRICT OF � - � MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Scale: 1:2,500 � `� ��, _�`�- L--� 1--�° �'� DATE: Dec 5, 2013 FILE: 2012-021-VP BY: PC C-1 Setback PROPOSED SETBACK VARIANCE 7 7 �th ��E�1l�E �Y� � 4 _ =,s= V�ried Setback� �� � - - _ -� APPENDIX B i'r ��n' , a4,�i �':L' IlhC:i L'JCs L,}' I [j44F1! q[�liF '�}ei PROPOSED HEIGHT VARIANCE r Varied Maximum Height � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � �i � �r � � .� T Et.�tiF l I'�E � � - 3f T0: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Development Permit 11185 240 Street and 11133 240 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: January 20 2014 FILE N0: 2012-020-DP MEETING: C of W Development Permit application 2012-020-DP has been received in conjunction with rezoning application 2011-084-RZ. This application rezones a larger site to a number of zones, and specifically rezones a portion of the subject site along 240 Street and along 112 Avenue to RST Street Townhouse Residential for 24 street-oriented townhouses in 6 buildings, plus one duplex for a total of 26 dwelling units. This development permit application is subject to the Multi-Family Development Permit Area Guidelines in Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan. The associated rezoning application was revised and the bylaws were required to be amended and a new Public Hearing to be held. Council granted first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6853- 2011 on August 30, 2011. Council granted first and second readings for site specific text Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6947-2012 and Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6875-2011 on October 9, 2011. On July 23, 2013, Council rescinded readings for the two rezoning bylaws, granted amended second reading. On August 27, 2013, Council held the new Public Hearing and granted third reading to the two amended rezone amending bylaws. Council will be considering final reading for rezoning application 2011-084-RZ on January 28, 2014. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-020-DP respecting property located at 11185 240 Street and 11133 240 Street. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Damax Consultants Ltd. (David Laird) Qualico Developments (Vancouver) Inc. (Inc. No. A26101) Lot "C" District Lot 404 Group 1 NWP19825 Lot "D" District Lot 404 Group 1 NWP19825 Commercial and Urban Residential Commercial and Urban Residential � 1 ' Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RST (Street Townhouse Residential), R-2 (Urban Residential District), R-1(Residential District), and C-1(Neighbourhood Commercial) Surrounding Uses North: South East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Concurrent Applications: b) Project Description: Single Family Residential, Neighbourhood Commercial and Townhouse RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), C-1(Neighbourhood Commercial) and RM-1(Townhouse Residential) Commercial and Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Medium Density Residential, Neighbourhood Commercial and Conservation Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Urban Residential and Conservation Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 3.269 Ha. (8.1 Acres) 112 Avenue and 240 Street Full Urban Standard 2011-084-RZ and 2012-020-VP This development permit application applies to a portion of a larger project, involving the zoning of the subject site located at 11185 240 Street and 11133 240 Street. These two properties are being rezoned from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to the following zones: • RST (Street Townhouse Residential) for townhouses to be subject to this development permit and for the duplex; • R-1 (Residential District) for a small portion of the site to be compatible with lands to the south and the west; • R-2 (Urban Residential District) for the interior portion of the site; and • C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) for the mixed-use building at the corner. This rezoning would permit subdivision into 24 RST (Street Townhouse Residential) lots, 39 R-2 (Urban Residential District) single family lots, one remnant R-1 lot to be subdivided when lands to the south along 111 Avenue are developed, and one (1) commercial property with two rental units on the second level of the proposed mixed-use building. -2- This development permit applies to the proposed RST street-oriented townhouse units, with 2 four- unit buildings totaling 8 units located along 112 Avenue and 4 four-unit buildings totaling 16 units along 240 Street. Subject to a design covenant rather than this development permit, a separated duplex unit facing 240t" Street has the same design as the adjacent townhouses. A total of 26 street-oriented dwelling units are to be constructed on the proposed RST zoned portion of the site. c) Planning Analysis: The Official Community Plan designates the site Commercial and Urban Residential, and the proposed street-oriented townhouse development is subject to the Multi-Family Development Permit Area Guidelines in Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan. The applicable key guideline concepts for Commercial Areas are as follows: 1: Building Design, Massing & Siting Form of development proposes 26 ground-oriented street townhouse units of approximately 2,000 square feet each, grouped into 7 small buildings with 2 to 4 units per building. This creates a smaller, pedestrian scaled building form and mass. The buildings are located closer to the street to enhance the row house streetscape and intimate feel of the development. Each unit has direct access to grade from the rear backyards and stair access at the front entries. Together, these units will form the streetscapes of 240th Street and 112th Avenue. All buildings conform to the 11 metre (or 3 storey) maximum building height. The development features articulation in vertical and horizontal planes through the use of projected bays and gables to create an interesting building mass while breaking up the streetscape elevations. 2: Development, Density & Height The development takes into consideration changes in site grading. Buildings are stepped in order to maintain conformance to the height envelope and building guidelines as established by the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan. The development is formed in a compact housing cluster to allow for a more dense urban environment and minimalizes the impact to the existing neighbourhoods in the area. The development adopts Best Management Practices (BMPs) throughout. 3: Community & Architectural Aesthetic In order to create unit individuality within the development, this "row house" aesthetic was adopted to provide more of a community feel, to represent a human scale, and to minimize the effect of an additional multi-family development within the area. This variation in individual unit design avoids significant repetition of the block clusters on the development site. To further this concept, architectural features, colour schemes, and materials were chosen in careful consideration of surrounding developments and were modeled to naturally complement the Maple Ridge area including the Fraser River, landscape, and surrounding mountains. To maximize the project's architectural aesthetic, all units have been designed to include front porches, bay projections, and building recesses. This provides a more interesting character and variation in building form and massing. -3- 4: Pedestrian Circulation, Landscaping & Parking The development's design aims to encourage pedestrian traffic through the use of street facing porches, individual walkways, and front gate statements. Natural landscaping, architectural details, and streetscape lighting are also used to further enhance the pedestrian experience. Rear garages that are architecturally similar to the principle street townhouses sit to the rear of each unit, allowing for streetscape appeal by minimalizing vehicular traffic on the street side. d) Advisory Design Panel: The proposal was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel on May 8, 2013. The following is the architect's response to the ADP's comments: 1. Look at the material treatment on each residential block to better define individual units. Response: Each unit has a clearly defined form, separated from adjacent units by articulating an individual entry statement porch roof as well as individual door colours. 2. Provide a complete street boulevard landscape design coordinated with civil drawings. Response: Landscape drawings have been updated to match the current architectural and civil drawings. 3. Provide detailed landscape design and specification for the residential units. Response: Landscape drawings and plant list are provided. 4. Consider a hedge or fence to delineate the private yards in the gaps between units. Response: A three foot high wooden fence is used to delineate the individual units in the front yards. A six foot high privacy fence delineates the units and is also used to separate buildings. e) Financiallmplications: In accordance with Council's Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of the estimated landscape cost, including street trees, will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on an estimated landscape cost of $159,388.08, the security will be $159,388.08. CONCLUSION: The design and character of this housing development will result in a strong street-oriented and pedestrian-friendly environment on both 112 Avenue and 240 Street. It relates well to the development under construction to the north and will complement the emerging neighbourhood in this part of the community. '� As the development proposal complies with the Multi-Family Development Permit Guidelines of the Official Community Plan for form and character, it is recommended that 2012-020-DP be given favourable consideration. "Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski" Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP Planner "Original signed by Charles R. Goddard" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B- Site Plan and Detail Appendix C - Elevations Appendix D - Streetscape Appendix E- Landscaping Plan and Fence Detail -5- APPENDIX A Me Pitt District of Langley 11133 & 1 1 1 85-240 St �! CORPORATION OF — THE DISTRICT OF - � MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Scale: 1:2,500 � �� �, '�f� DATE: Sep 26, 2012 2012-020-DP BY: JV APPENDIX B1 F�xr� � � e Home�P Southwest Corner of 240th Street & i12 Avenue, Maple Ridge, B.C. �AN.A7C C:JNSULI�ANT5 LTa. ATELIER ARCHI7ECTURE INC. SEPTEMBER 2013 ihouse Development DP-1.0 ZONING SITE PLAN SCALE:1:400, � :� � � , �� *;� ��� . .'� ��4 APPENDIX B2 DETAIL OF SAMPLE TOWNHOUSE BLOCK EX �TTOPv" Oi S�_0�� � .�r Colaurs � Mksterfal PaletRe CaLOUR SCFfEME i TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION APPENDIX C1 �.... fi-.:.:..:...,, ��� �. � � � ...... . ' ' . '. �:.. 3■�.:. 8. � 13� .. �... 4 9 �4 . '� .:. � . : ..... 5 10 15 � � �;' . --� � r �.�.� - i Foxridge H �mes P Sou[hwest Corner of 240th Strae[ & 1�2 A�enue, NFapie Ridga, B.C. ; ❑IIMAX CONS�iLTAN-S LTO. ATELIER ARCHITECTl7AE lNC. SfPiEMeER 2073 . . ��4 hause De�eka_pment D P- 0.1 A =---� COLdURS MATERiAL .��• PALETTE _� Y Calours � Materiai Palette APPENDIX C2 , g „ � ■ �- . ... .. 7 12 - . . . ....��._ 3 8 13 ," ■c�.;,_�'�.. -.�. : � 4 9 14 . : .:, : . � 5 1fl I 15 ....... J'-.�....•.. •• I .. /.".� — — — — — - — — - — - R — — ---- -- / � � - � � � � - Ir i �I� .. .. � � ��.�J. { L_.w i f� !� .� I. _- JI -_ I �. ... I "'_. � I�- � .I s..I. II.�_ __—_"�L. �. � — W f� { ���. I ._— � - _�7 � '"_"' "'_. � r. "x. r I. �.� �1 ` •.s. . . . . .... ,i �.,. _- ��.. I i�i � '� �''^� � ' I'�� __" -" ":� - �. 3 ��V . - � ..— . . I.. '��. . - - "��0.i• I .: I �L �- . _ _ • � � . � ^T.. 1 µ ����_ 1.11. . .6. j: _ .��+• . �... j. � _ ___ �.1. ,. ��I f. � = �,�, . . _ . ... _.�(Z�s��.r'�-.'"�_..'A-r. �__�_'f'a. . .. .. C�L�UR SCNEME 1 TYPICAL REAR ELEVATION Foxridge H �rnes � Sou[hwest Corner of 240th Strae[ & 1�2 A�enue, NFapie Ridga, B.C. ; ❑IIMAX CONS�iLTAN-S LTO. ATELIER ARCHITECTl7AE lNC. SfPiEMeER 2073 . . ��4 hause De�ek4pment DP-�.1 B --=T, COLnuR5 Mq7ER1AL .��• PALETTE _� w Colaurs I Ma[erial Pale[te CDL�UR �CHEIIAE 1 TYPICAL SIOE ELEVATl�3J Foxridge H �rnes Sou[hwest Corner of 240th Strae[ & 1�2 A�enue, NFapie Ridga, B.C. ❑IIMAX CONS�iLTAN-S LTO. ATELIER ARCHITECTl7AE lNC. SfPiEMeER 2073 I APPENDIX C3 hause D�ye�Qpment . � DP-fl.1 C � COLOliRS fViATER1AL .�� -- PALETTE _� Y _; , .�.� .�.n .�� � � --- -- - -- , F:.. _— ---. i � /.' "__ _ �, ' i _ '-�i.7F�'L e �`' ��j~ } { �\ � 1 1 � • r- -r, r i ��� , � _ -#- - -- �r • ._ � � ` �- - r'" . � r, '! • ` �i . �'T' ' ��; � "'�i �/�• - i �, '.' T' ' � . . .'i�. rl�. � .�t.. �' � � ' - ��. � ������ � �� �/.� . � ' '� ��jy�, �1� � �. �.�.: .'T:�'— =1. i` .'!.'— .1'.`— �� . .i_ "_"'I�' - � :. .� �� – `��4� : � Z ; _ � � �+; �; ; ��rr�;; _ . .;�--- ��_ ,, � -�� � .-�, � - � .�- � , _ _ , _ � . �; � . �r'• , . 3 _� •��r . ..— - - - ;?'?�.�� {, ' �" lF' .: - . . , ,� ,. _ _ _ _ . . � — -- -- . � �=— -- .....�. .. .... �..,.. �...�.... �..� �....� �..�..�.� �.. ...... .» �,..., �.�......� �..�....240 STREET 3ECTION I � I•xr�. � � F ` T �� ::'�_. T , : /� /�. ? i � ' � I I ., _ —,� ; �� c..- .`i' i 2A0 STRFET SECTION FORREFERENCEON�Y- ___ ___ _ _ _ __ 'r,.� __ ::�"., I /s "� � - - ��` - - I� �c�f. .:' _{ I _ �r' •� -�I �'. �.� — �� s - --�G� n-. � r. - �'� � =1 ~.�.: f �r � s �; �' ' .' ; r, � � — i. i � '---�' �_. : -�� ,7 � . ��� - -- .-w �.--�= .. - F�R REF ERENCE ONLY - I . I l_ ... . � i- .. � � � � .. � � i .. ....:...:::.�. _ - � =--.�=x: :__ . y . ......�� . � �-�_. - — APPENDIX D � . , --- ; - ., � �1.; _ . ��r .. •::�� :f :i . _ . !. . a-..�-_, 'ik �:.-: . � �..' :�,i .'�' — � 11—.—��� �i �i �_ ,�l:l�..�.-�]�i� ` -- — •i'�4i'i '�' �- - - - - �: ,� ,r .~ V ��" 24U STREET SECTPON i I ;ip ! I ��a � ��� . . .�1 ' I' i_. J �.: . r... _ _ ;:�.. _ ... �:� -- - ^ = ' ' .� . � u ��.`. I._...'�. �,, -. . . � � �+ = �� � �' --- --- � 112 AVENl1E Fo x r i d�� H� m e s P❑pa$ed S ,�house �e�elopment Southweat Carner oT 240[h Street & 112 Avenue, Maple Ridga, B.C. `� � ;t�. ;-�' '�, A��.0 • ti A �� lr.a, ❑AMA7C CONSLJLTANTS L'D. a ATELIER ARCH4TECTURE INC. � .�_ _�� 1 OECEIMBER09,4013 • '- '1� '�4 , �� � y �_��� � APPENDIX E1 OVERALLREFERENCEPLAN pCopyrignt reservetl. Tnis tlrawing and design is antl "��32�_.�_ °°°"""ne a<w�vr,r.iv rve. ae an ��m� �ema�s me ��i�s��e e or �H� JHL Design Group Inc. � a= RowHouseoeve�oPMeNr proper y _ _ oLANDSCAPE PLAN Desgn Group Inc ond cannot be used wlthout Ihe � ___. wnp ���3311385,2405TREET,MAPLERIDGE I'C landsope mchltect's wrltten consent. LandscapeArchltec�ure+UrbanDesign Emo�� n,e.s,.�.na.� BLOCK6X,7X L�J -, ;�, : �, ,� OVER4LLREFERENCEPLAN a �� APPENDIX E2 i � I p Copyright reserved. This drowing ond design is and N �F��3z,_�, a. �zo�cc. .n�c re.�nxc n�� m. at au ume� �ema�s me ex�i����e r or �H� JHL D2Sign GrOup In0. � a= aowHouseoeve�oPnneNT proper y � - - oLANDSCAPE PLAN Design G�oup Inc ana cannot be usea wimout me ___ o wx 11133-11385,2405TREET,MAPLERIDGE I'/� ia�dsape a�ch'�tect's w�'�tte� co�se�t- LendscepeArchltecture+UrbenDeslBn Emo, fee g�� .m BLOCK4Y,SV � FRONT ELEVATION TRELLIS AND FENCE WOODEN FENCE � � ���e =u��o�e dro�o9e �r. BI <owe sec.e.ncai. oxea wooa tree e� _>�� e ��as me TREEPLANTING-TVPICAL rvo**osca�E 3' HIGH WOODEN FENCE DETAIL APPENDIX E3 /���=r 9�aee�<�k ��,� ������ v. � _ .uas o�e �o oo�.en <o as,. SHRl18PLHNTING-TYPICAL Norrosca�E q CopyrigM1t reserved This drowing ond design is and N `/32 -i'-0" Preoxc. m� renmrv�.me at all Umes remans the exdusi�e property of JHL ///���� `�HL �e$19n GrOuP �nC. `a` ROW HOUSEDEVELOPMENT Design Group Inc. and cannot be used w'ithout the � ___ wn 1113311385, 240 STREET, MAPLE RIDGE oDETAILS �L'G` ianasape arcnttect's wntten consent. LandscapeArchitecWre+UrbanDesign Emo�� �,,,y��a„.,� xo �� T0: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE N0: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Development Variance Permit 11185 240 Street and 11133 240 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: January 20, 2014 2012-020-DVP CoW Development Variance Permit application 2012-020-DVP has been received in conjunction with rezoning application 2011-084-RZ. This application rezones a larger site to a number of zones, and specifically rezoning a portion of the subject site along 240 Street and along 112 Avenue to RST Street Townhouse Residential for 24 ground-oriented townhouses in 7 buildings, one of which is a duplex. There are two sets of variances requested. For the RST townhouses, the request is to reduce front setbacks, to reduce the width of the private back yard space for end units and to apply urban road standards. For all the R-2 lots, the request is to increase the maximum residential building height in line with the proposed new Zoning Bylaw. For the R-2 lots that abut the lane common to the RST townhouses, the variance is to apply the same setbacks and lot width requirements as for the lots that do not abut lanes and to allow vehicle access from the street rather than from the lane. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2012-020-DVP be approved. The associated rezoning application and design proposal was revised after land ownership changed. Consequently, the rezoning bylaw which already was at third reading, was required to be rescinded, modified and scheduled for a new Public Hearing. Council granted first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6853-2011 on August 30, 2011. Council granted first and second readings for site specific text Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6947-2012 and Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6875-2011 on October 9, 2011. Third reading was granted to the OCP Bylaw on November 20, 2012. On July 23, 2013, Council granted amended second readings for the two rezoning bylaws. On August 27, 2013, Council held the new Public Hearing and granted third reading to the two amended rezone amending bylaws. Council will be considering final reading for rezoning application 2011-084-RZ on January 28, 2014. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-020-DVP respecting property located at 11185 240 Street and 11133 240 Street. 1109 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Damax Consultants Ltd (Dave Laird) Qualico Developments (Vancouver) Inc. (Inc. No. A26101) Lot "C" District Lot 404 Group 1 NWP19825 and Lot "D" District Lot 404 Group 1 NWP19825 Commercial, Urban Residential and Conservation Urban Residential Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RST (Street Townhouse Residential), R-2 (Urban Residential District), R-1(Residential District), and C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) Surrounding Uses North: South: East: West: Use Zone Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Single Family Residential, Neighborhood Commercial and Townhouse RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) C-1(Neighbourhood Commercial) and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Commercial and Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Medium Density Residential, Neighbourhood Commercial and Conservation Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Urban Residential and Conservation Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential, Commercial with rental apartments on the second floor, and park Site Area: 3.269 Ha. (8.1 Acres) Access: 112 Avenue and 240 Street Servicing requirement: Full Urban Standard Concurrent Applications: 2100-084-RZ and 2012-020-DP -2- b) Requested Variance: 1. Part 6, 601D RST Street Townhouse Residential of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 is proposed to be varied as follows: Section 6.0 Setbacks: The front setback stated in the table for Principal Building (lane access) is varied by reducing it from 4 metres to 2.93 metres including projections for the front porch elements. Section 6.0 Setbacks, Section 2: The open space dimensions for useable rear yard private outdoor space is varied from 6.5 metre by 7.5 metres to 9.12 metres by 5.7 metres for the end units in each building block, except for the westernmost unit in the building block at the corner of 112 Avenue and 239 Street where the dimension is varied to 9.0 metres by 5.7 metres. Section 9.0 Other Regulations, Sections 1 and 2 are waved because they apply to Silver Valley and urban standards will apply to the subject development site. 2. Part 6, 601B R-2 Urban Residential District of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 is proposed to be varied as follows: • Section C. AREA AND DIMENSIONS, 1. Lot Dimensions is varied to apply the width regulation for "lots without lane access" to Lots 28 through 44. • Section D. YARD REQUIREMENTS a) is varied to apply the setback regulations of sub- section 2 to Lots 28 through 44. • Section E. HEIGHT, 1. Height is varied to increase the maximum height requirement for all buildings and structures for one family residential use from 9.75 metres to 11 metres. • Section F. OTHER REGULATIONS, is varied such that Section 1 Access does not apply to Lots 28 through 44. c) Project Description: RST Component: A total of 24 street-oriented RST dwellings are being proposed along 112 Avenue and 240 Street. Facing 112 Avenue, 2 buildings with 4-units each, for a total of 8 units are proposed, and on 240 Street, 4 buildings with 4-units each, for a total of 16 units, plus a duplex. Parking is provided in detached car garages with laneway access. Two spaces are provided side-by-side in the garages for each unit. Residential Subdivision: The remaining portion of the site south and west of the lane behind the RST components is a single family residential subdivision. There will be 37 R-2 Urban Residential District zoned (312 m2) lots, and one remnant R-1 Residential District zoned (371 m2) lot to be subdivided when lands to the south of 111 Avenue are developed. These lot sizes and the proposed pattern will ensure this subdivision is compatible with the Wynn Ridge subdivision by Genstar. d) Planning Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for single family development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. -3- The justifications for the requested RST Zone variances are as follows: 1. Reducing front setbacks: This variance is to allow the covered front entrance porch for each unit to be located closer to sidewalks. This will allow for the fa�ade to be articulated, create a stronger street presence and would be consistent with setback reductions for townhouse units elsewhere in the community along major corridor streets. 2. Reducing the open space dimensions: This variance is for the private outdoor space behind the end units. The usual dimensional requirement is 7.5 metres by 6.0 metres. It is proposed that the second dimension be reduced from 6.0 metres to 5.7 metres. This is necessary to facilitate building wall articulation for the townhouse blocks. This is supportable because the width is increased such that the minimum of 45 square metres of opens space is provided behind each of the end units. 3. Waving the added servicing requirements: The RST Zone was designed for the Silver Valley Area where the servicing and road standards are related to the eco-clustering concept. It would be more consistent to apply the usual urban standards to the subject site, therefore the Silver Valley specific provisions are to be waved. The justifications for the requested R-2 Zone variances are as follows: 1. Setback and lot width requirements: A portion of the R-2 Zone subdivisions has lots backing on a lane. This lane is necessary for the garages associated with the RST townhouses since access to the collector roads (e.g. 112 Avenue and 240 Street) are restricted. However, the R-2 Zone has different requirements for lots depending on whether or not they have lane access. The request is to apply the non-lane regulations consistently to all the lots in the subdivision. This is requested for two reasons. Firstly, it would address lane access due to grade for some R-2 lots. Secondly, use of the same minimum lot widths, minimum front setbacks and front yard driveway access requirements for each of the single family lots in the subdivision would result in a more appropriate and balanced residential streetscape. 2. Maximum height requirement: Due to grade and roofline design, the applicant is requesting that the maximum building height requirement be increased. An 11 metre height will permit an aesthetically pleasing collection of diverse housing styles with roof lines on the sloping lands. It would also facilitate the development of common housing forms present in maple Ridge. This would be consistent with the same variance that was granted to the Wynnridge subdivision to the southwest and is in keeping with the proposed maximum height height requirement to be contained in the proposed New Zoning Bylaw. The Planning and the Engineering Departs support these variances. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed setback, minimum back yard open space and lot dimensions, maximum height and servicing variances are supported by the Planning and Engineering Departments and the Approving Officer because they provide for flexibility in the design and siting of the proposed townhouses, a more appropriate subdivision pattern, and are consistent with variances granted to similar developments in the area. � It is therefore recommended that this application be favourably considered and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Development Variance Permit 2012-020-DVP. "Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski" Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP Planner "Original signed by Charles R. Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B- Proposed RST Zone Variances Appendix C- Proposed R-2 Zone Variances -5- APPENDIX A Me Pitt District of Langley 11133 & 1 1 1 85-240 St �! CORPORATION OF — THE DISTRICT OF - � MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Scale: 1:2,500 � �� �, '�f� DATE: Sep 26, 2012 2012-020-DP BY: JV PROPOSED RST ZONE VARIANCES Varied Setback Porch Element ^ ��� � , , �� I // � �, A ' Usual Setback _ � ���= ����C9�s� � � JC ��� .:',i �� cz�, � I I ��' � - i � .` _Ohs - Varied Open Space ��� � �.�s' � � ����) �� � Hi: F���K) � '�; 1ENT /1.J6' �21./' M) w (�'PI� FLCOh) � � 61.75' (18_6: h�11 �n �;� F.E> 27A2 i�' � � �, r � �" �t� � f �� �� I �3 �� �� � ; � �L � � �:i � �I � � � � i�h�, Fi- � i � � ��?��� ���,. \ Usual Open Space �=_�,� � i i �1� ❑ �� � ., . APPENDIX B E�. ��ITT��;I`," ��i J_�;;�r� , ; �o�> «+�,�si � /< �F� , ., , , T_�� ; /-% F i:�m ,.5� :� F T� � � `° � � � k � . •_� �� / � � E, i �cic-� - / i /� B�LO K 7X ' , ;' au � R i so,cM' °� � �.4F ��+,�r,�; a9 1e' �`�� 4�!' � rri iN F�o�k;� �' � M�;iv Fu oH)� �L �.,i� F�cch;" � Nl� C' ;Ee1EVT O � NO C JEF,IENT %N; DASE'AENT Y (V � u ' 2 2 ' 24A4 � J — - � iT— � QL __� � T�_, - L-, ���� _1 �s�_L__ [� �� ._ . , . _ - iva.re r,�r =. .: -: e � � � Ai Reo . � � � a�.: � �� � I`.EL. . J 6 . I �y< � V � � T � . —. ''_r=. � - - ,-, i � �I �-� _ � - I � �-•; w � a�'�z��i � I'.-'.� 9 a ��2��p✓ RN�� �I��o� r�1 � �F'."�' ��; �--�. � ��–_,. - –,���I,_ - I I ❑ - L�� /�'l7 [JU.�J-J � !.i l. l .,._11) CC=r.bi. .,u.... � s. _ L J, I _ i0 ,�, O Y�. O O � O�e� ��y � `�� � � � � � , �. APPENDIX C1 PROPOSED R-2 ZONE VARIANCES For lot Width, Setbacks and Access (Height on next pages) `-*if .9,� rs� � v� � , ._ .m I � � .m _., `�� V r� � 27 25 25 24 IJ 22 �1 � 2� w�w r�� b« �3 �° �� � �R ip� �� , �rt d a� � ! ,. se�..�:n.w,..� ¢ �,,. _„ ��. .� �� i i i� i i i R'. -'"'- �� ��.��t• �R tA �.�� y ""� � Sh de lots trea�ed ! n� � a � a�. L � � - ��� � ��° .n v 4 +Q+D �� 7 �lr��� �1 FC�J `�� 3 is a.w � '�i'�; e f� � x'a ,� o�.H _ � � l� „i�, � �- r4 A,,..� � ,;r< a��e���. «,., �,:�, � � o`.� 5 ,� p� � -- £ry �� ' -` � � /��cess- o,P „ pr„� � `R .�;� � g ;=w �� ,.3 � ,�� a S�Seet ot� � - r , �n �� ............................................................._.._............�........r�:............................_..L._�.n.�....f... r ' �.w a . � .;,.�.��_a ..............................................._.._..... r• om � � ° ,�:� sh�led Imt� s �.�. e�� a;� - M� � 4 �' �r ,�.� B 9 �� r J � t C A_ ` _ -_' .i� ' �as � 1e11.� A �na�a - �� �� � l+aFP � y µ � fu tl � aru u y� � x c�� � S � u �i . � , A g � ���e � 5 e.�.. 3 0 xe�m � n �� s 4 � 4'�,.�� e a? � ,. .,o � B j �a 4 � � � xi w , � - �n� �� ��, - ° 3 m.�w � I6 � v � � � � :. - ..�� � +� 4� ; , �` �. �, ------- ------- ------ ------ ------ -�} Variance for Height on Downhill Lots: Variance for Height on Uphill Lots: 11.0 m � � � � 9.75m�_ ���� 11.Om ____ __ i::.�. ,.� ��inew. 9.75 m — —T��- �' '�- �.�: ���` �_ - - � „ ' .�.1, � FE@ONT ELEYATION APPENDIX C2 � � 11.0 m � � � —���� —�� 9.75m — � � ►� � � ► � � � � ► � � 11.0 m _ �� � � � 9.75 m ` .�� �..'�.,_ . i � �,� `-�'. �� � � ;--- — _ � _ � .. . r . L----�� LEFT ELEYATION Q- - ��� � : -.� � � � District of Maple Ridge T0: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: January 20, 2013 FILE N0: 2013-109-AL MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Application to Include Land into the Agricultural Land Reserve 26520 112 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received under Section 17 3) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act to include within the Agricultural Land Reserve approximately 2 hectares (5 acres) of land. The Applicant's submission conforms to the application requirements of the Agricultural Land Commission. RECOMMENDATION: That the application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with a summary of Council's comments and the staff report. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: David T Fremantle David T Fremantle Lot: 11, Section: 7, Township: 15, Plan: NWP10586 Rural Residential No Change RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) No Change 1110 Surrounding Uses North: South East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Farm and Rural Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Rural Residential Use: Vacant Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Agricultural Use: Rural Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Rural Residential Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: b) Project Description: Rural Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Rural Residential Rural Residential Agriculture and Rural Residential 2 hectares (5 acres) 112t" Avenue The applicant intends to use the property for agricultural purposes and is of the opinion that inclusion into the Agricultural Land Reserve would be in the best interests of this farming operation. The proposed operation is for an edible chestnut orchard. The property is bounded on its east and west by lands designated Rural Residential, but is in the vicinity of properties within the Agricultural Land Reserve. The property is zoned RS-3 One Family Rural Residential, and this proposed use would be permitted on the property without the need for inclusion. c) Planning Analysis: This application is unusual in that it is proposing to include land in the Agricultural Land Reserve without additional conditions (such as the exclusion of land elsewhere from the Agricultural Land Reserve). Because it is so unusual, there are few precedents in which to review this application, either at a municipal or a regional level. However, Policy 6-12 of the Official Community Plan states the following: Maple Ridge will protect the productivity of its agricultural land by: a) Adopting a guiding principle of "positive benefit to agriculture" when making land use decisions that could atfect the agricultural land base, with favorable recognition of initiatives including but not limited to supportive non-farm uses, infrastructure improvements for farmland, or the inclusion of land elsewhere in the Agricultural Land Reserve;... -2- The present zoning of the subject property currently permits agriculture. This application, if successful, would give greater permanence to its agricultural future. On this basis, the application is supportable. The current zoning would allow for on-site retail of product grown on site. Permitted processing would be limited to the cleaning, sorting, and packaging of raw product for shipment or accessory produce sales. The inclusion of the subject property into the Agricultural Land Reserve would also allow for more value added opportunities such as processing and agri-tourism under the regulations of the Agricultural Land Commission Act. Agricultural Land Commission The mandate of the Agricultural Land Commission is to preserve agricultural land and to enable farm businesses to prosper. In reviewing this application for inclusion, the Commission will likely use the same criteria as for exclusion from the Reserve. On this basis, it is not clear that the application would be successful, as the subject property is not contiguous with properties that are within the Agricultural Land Reserve. Metro Vancouver The Regional Growth Strategy, the long range plan for Metro Vancouver, was adopted in 2011. It identifies and distinguishes between Rural and Agricultural Land Use designations. The subject property is designated Rural, which is consistent with its zoning and land use designation. Generally, properties within the Agricultural Land Reserve are designated Agricultural. If this application is successful, this inconsistency would not be a conflict. The land uses associated with the Rural land use designation include "low density residential development, small scale commercial, industrial, and institutional uses, and agricultural uses that do not require the provision of urban services such as sewer or transit". (Metro Vancouver 2040, Shaping our Future, 2011) d) Alternatives: This application for inclusion of the subject property into the Agricultural Land Reserve is consistent with the policy direction of the Official Community Plan towards land use decisions that have a positive benefit to agriculture. As with other applications to the Agricultural Land Commission, Council has the option to deny the application from proceeding further, in which case it will be considered denied. CONCLUSION: This application for inclusion into the Agricultural Land Reserve is intended to support a proposed nut orchard. The RS-3 One Family Rural Residential zoning of the subject property would permit this use, and for this reason, a successful outcome of this application would not be required in order to realize this proposal. -3- As this application would assist in securing an agricultural future for the subject property, it is felt to be supportable and therefore, the recommendation is to allow the application to proceed to the Agricultural Land Commission. "Original signed bv Diana Hall" Prepared by: Diana Hall, MCIP, RPP Planner II "Original signed bv Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Ouinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original si ned by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A: Subject Map Appendix B: OCP Designation Map -4- N Scal e: 1:3, 000 Legend Agricultural Park Rural Residential Institutional 26520-112 Ave * CORPORATION OF — THE DISTRICT OF - � MAPLE RIDGE FINANCE DEPARTMENT DATE: Nov 19, 2013 2013-109-AL BY: JV � � Deep Roofs Greater Heights T0: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: January 20, 2014 FILE N0: E05-010-045 MEETING: C of W Award of Contract ITT-EN13-71: Storm Sewer Replacement on Donovan Avenue, 21500 Block EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Donovan Avenue storm sewer project is required to relocate a section of storm sewer that crosses a private property without a statutory right-of-way and to replace a section of failing wood stave pipe. The owner of the property initially approached the District regarding the relocation because they want to re-develop the property and the location of the existing main constrains their planned development. The overall tendered project involves the replacement of 200m of storm sewer pipe, the installation of three new manholes and an improved outfall to McKenney Creek. The project was tendered on November 15, 2013 and the tender period closed on December 6, 2013. Eighteen tenders were received and the lowest compliant bid was submitted by Strohmaier's Excavating Ltd. at $157,446.73 (excluding taxes). Staff have reviewed the tenders and recommend that the project proceed as envisioned. Existing project funding will be supplemented by funds from the Annual Drainage Program. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Contract ITT-EN13-71: Storm Sewer Replacement on Donovan Avenue, 21500 Block, be awarded to Strohmaier's Excavating Ltd. in the amount of $157,446.73 plus applicable taxes; and THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The project has two distinct components: First of all it is necessary to replace a section of storm sewer which crosses a private property that is planned for re-development and relocate it into a new right-of-way. The owner initially approached the District to relocate the storm sewer because they are re-developing the property for the construction of two separate units. The second section connected to and upstream of the first section is an aged wood stave pipe with major defects (rotted, displaced, and missing boards, several voids) which was originally planned for replacement in 2016. To minimize disruption to the residents, we combined both projects into one tender package. The tendered project includes replacement of approximately 200m of storm sewer and installation of three new manholes along Donovan Avenue and an improved outfall to McKenney Creek. The project was tendered on November 15, 2013 and the tender period closed on December 6, 2013. Tender results Eighteen tenders were received and opened in public. The six lowest tender prices are listed below, from lowest to highest price (excluding taxes). Strohmaier's Excavating Ltd. Capilano Highway Services Company Earthco Underground Limited Targa Contracting Ltd. G&E Contracting LP (Non-compliant Bid) Sandpiper Contracting LLP Tendered Price $157,446.73 $175,920.00 $185,900.00 $190,156.00 $193,998.95 $196,007.00 Staff have reviewed the tenders received and recommend the award to Strohmaier's Excavating Ltd., who submitted the lowest compliant bid of $157,446.73 excluding taxes. b) Desired Outcome: Council approval to award the contract, in order to provide the necessary replacement and upgrading of infrastructure. c) Strategic Alignment: The Corporate Strategic Plan has directed staff to manage municipal infrastructure replacement including roads and sewer through infrastructure plans. The plan to upgrade this sewer system has been developed and it is now appropriate to complete the construction. d) Citizens/Customer Implications: The project will improve the storm water drainage in the area and is sized to accommodate any potential development as outlined in the OCP. Construction will commence soon after the project is awarded and attempts will be made to minimize the impact to everyday traffic, residents, and businesses in the neighbourhood. The road is expected to remain open to traffic throughout the construction. The estimated construction duration is two weeks and there will be notification to residents. e) Interdepartmentallmplications: The Engineering Department has worked with the Operations Department to develop this project. f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The project funding is comprised of $35,137.81 from LTC 336 as well as $138,053.00 in funds from the Annual Drainage Upgrade Program (LTC 7938) to complete the as tendered project. The projected expenditures are as follows: Construction $ 157,446 Contingency (10%) $ 15,745 Total Projected Project Cost $ 173,191 CONCLUSIONS: The tender price of $157,446.73 excluding taxes, by Strohmaier's Excavating Ltd. for the Storm Sewer Replacement on Donovan Avenue, 21500 Block project is the lowest tendered price. Council approval to award the work to Strohmaier's Excavating Ltd. is recommended. "Original signed byJeff Boehmer" Submitted by: Jeff Boehmer, PEng. Manager of Design & Construction "Original signed by David Pollock" Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng. Municipal Engineer "Original signed by Frank Quinn" "Original signed by Catherine Nolan" for Financial Trevor Thompson, CGA Concurrence: Manager of Financial Planning Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. Rule" Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer VS/ m i � s- -`- . Deep Roots Greater Heights T0: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer DATE: January 20, 2014 Committee of the Whole Disbursements for the month ended December 31, 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The disbursements summary for the past period is attached for information. All voucher payments are approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor and a Finance Manager. Council authorizes the disbursements listing through Council resolution. Expenditure details are available by request through the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION: That the disbursements as listed below for the month ended December 31, 2013 now be approved. GENERAL $ 9,199,338 PAYROLL $ 1,762,257 PURCHASE CARD $ 95.458 11.057.053 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan. b) Community Communications: The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial disbursements. 1131 c) Business Plan / Financial Implications: Highlights of larger items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution • Fraser Valley Regional Library - 4th quarter member assessment $ 647,745 • GCL Contracting & Engineering - 232 St. bridge replacement $ 454,073 • G.V. Water District - water consumption Aug 28 to Oct 1/13 $ 813,910 • RCMP Receiver General - RCMP contract Jul-Sep/13 $ 3,393,116 d) Policy Implications: Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice. CONCLUSIONS: The disbursements for the month ended December 31, 2013 have been reviewed and are in order. Prepared by: G'Ann Rygg Accounting Clerk II Approved by: Trevor Thompson, BBA, CGA Manager of Financial Planning Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, CGA GM - Corporate & Financial Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer gmr VENDOR NAME 0924680 BC Ltd 655287 BC Ltd AOK Tree Service Ltd BC Hydro BC SPCA BFI Canada Vancouver Billesberger, Valerie Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd CUPE Local 622 Chevron Canada Ltd Chroma Communications Inc Civicplus Dekra-Lite Delcan Corporation Dougness Holdings Ltd Downtown Maple Ridge Business Emco Corporation Epic Homes (2012) J.V. FortisBC - Natural Gas Fraser Valley Regional Library Fricia Construction Inc GCL Contracting & Engineering Greater Vanc Water District Hacquebard, Simone Jacks Automotive & Welding Manulife Financial Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - DECEMBER 2013 DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT Security refund Security refund Roadside chipping program Electricity Contract payment Waste disposal Oct & Nov Document Management Jul 2- Sep 30/13 Maintenance: Banners Greg Moore Youth Centre Leisure Centre Library Maple Ridge Museum Maple Ridge Park Municipal Hall Operations Pitt Meadows Athletic Park Pitt Meadows Family Rec. Centre Randy Herman Building RCMP South Bonson Community Centre Street Lights Traffic Lights West Entrance Sign Dues - pay periods 13/24 & 13/25 Gasoline & diesel fuel Fire Dept radio system Website improvements Snowfall Christmas lights 232 Street bridge replacement - construction services Flush & CCTV storm and sanitary sewers 2013 fa�ade improvememt program 232 St pump station PRV retrofit Plumbing supplies: 210 Street roadworks Leisure Centre Operations inventory Whonnock Lake Park Security refund Natural gas 4th quarter member assessment Sanitary pump station seismic upgrade 232 Street bridge replacement Water consumption Aug 28 to Oct 1/13 Maple Ridge Main West PRV chamber Security refund Fire Dept equipment repairs Employer/employee remittance Arts Centre contract payment Dec Program revenue Oct & Nov 554 73 766 333 120 96 1,379 3,086 99 2,977 172 414 263 18,048 654 1, 545 10,984 3,099 518 811 814 AMOUNT 153,138 173,063 17,509 120,210 27,527 18,140 17,875 30,579 23,035 69,394 15,082 56,748 68,257 42,848 24,435 25,964 5,242 15,000 24,140 647,745 41,675 454,073 813,910 61,072 874,982 29,820 18,036 140,189 49,889 3,819 53,708 Medical Services Plan Mino, Gordon Mission Contractors Ltd Municipal Pension Plan BC North Of 49 Enterprises Ltd Pacific Surrey Construction Property Owners Raincity Janitorial Serv Ltd RCMP -Receiver General For Cda Receiver General For Canada Ridge Meadows Recycling Society Scottish Line Painting Ltd Suttle Recreation Inc TGK Irrigation Ltd Trisand Investments Warrington PCI Management Young, Anderson - Barristers Disbursements In Excess $15,000 Disbursements Under $15,000 Total Payee Disbursements Payroll Purchase Cards - Payment Total Disbursements December 2013 Employee medical & health premiums Tax sale refund Lougheed Hwy multi-use cycle path Employer/employee remittance Skating lesson programs Roadside chipping program Land acquisitions - 128 Ave road dedication Janitorial services & supplies: Firehalls Library Municipal Hall Operations Pitt Meadows Family Rec. Centre Randy Herman Building RCMP South Bonson Community Centre Holdback RCMP contract Jul-Sep/13 RCMP fingerprinting Employer/Employee remit PP13/24 & PP13/25 Monthly contract for recycling Weekly recycling Litter pickup contract Recycling station pickup Roadside waste removal Roadside chipping program Earth Day grant Road painting Westview bleachers Maple Ridge Park play equipment maintenance Albion Sports Water Play Park Security refund Advance for Tower common costs Professional fees Oct PP13/25 & PP13/26 6,222 6,022 2,934 2,954 1,222 4,348 3,112 5,021 -4, 546 3,393,116 650 GMR \\mr.corp\docs\Fin\05-Finance\1630-Accts-Payable\01-General\AP Disbursements\2013\[Monthly_Council_Report_2013.x1sx]DEC'13 106,784 336 1,848 330 516 1,678 600 36,119 28,170 103,995 399,871 25,509 19,647 136,253 27,289 3,393,766 542,456 112,092 26,456 56,023 420 56,443 61,856 148,943 60,000 26,240 8,404,499 794,839 9,199,338 1,762,257 95,458 11,057,053 � � Qecp Hoars Greater Heights T0: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: January 20, 2014 and Members of Council FILE N0: 3900-20/LAUT FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: ALTERNATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR CITY CLASSIFICATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: At the January 14, 2014 Council meeting, Council directed that approval of the electors to change classification of Maple Ridge from a District Municipality to a City be obtained through the alternative approval process. This report outlines the steps necessary to enact the alternative approval process. RECOMMENDATION: WHEREAS the District of Maple Ridge ("the District") proposes to change the classification of the municipality from a District Municipality to a City; AND WHEREAS Council resolved at its January 14, 2014 meeting that approval of the electors shall be sought through the alternative approval process in relation to the change in classification; NOW THEREFORE be it resolved as follows: 1. That the Manager of Legislative Services be authorized to publish, in accordance with the Community Charter, the alternative approval process notice attached as Appendix 1 to the staff report dated January 20, 2014 and titled "Alternative Approval Process for City Classification"; 2. That elector responses shall be in the form set out in Appendix 2 to the staff report dated January 20, 2014 and titled "Alternative Approval Process for City Classification"; 3. That the deadline for the submission of elector response forms shall be 4:00 p.m. on Monday, Monday, March 17, 2014; 4. That a fair determination of the total number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge is 53,745; 5. That the staff report dated January 20, 2014 and titled "Alternative Approval Process for City Classification", which contains the basis on which the determination of the total number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge to which the approval process applies, shall be made available to the public on request. DISCUSSION 1. Approval of the Electors By letters patent, the Lieutenant Governor in Council may, upon request of the council, change the classification of a municipality only after it has obtained the approval of the electors in relation to the proposed change. Approval of the electors may be obtained either through the assent process or the Page 1 1132 alternative approval process. At the January 14, 2014 Council meeting, Council directed that the alternative approval process be used. 2. Alternative Approval Process Electors who are opposed to the change in classification from a District Municipality to a City may complete an elector response form indicating this opposition and submit the form to Municipal Hall. Approval of the electors to proceed with the change of classification is obtained if, at the end of the time for receiving elector responses indicating that Council may not proceed with the bylaw unless assent of the electors is obtained, the number of responses is no more than 10% of the number of electors. Individuals signing the form must meet the eligibility criteria identified on the form. 3. Notice of Elector Approval Section 86 (2) of the Community Charter states that "Notice of an alternative approval process must be published in accordance with section 94 �public notice] and must include the following: (a) a general description of the proposed bylaw, agreement or other matter to which the approval process relates; (b) a description of the area to which the approval process applies; (c) the deadline for elector responses in relation to the approval process; (d) a statement that the council may proceed with the matter unless, by the deadline, at least 10% of the electors of the area indicate that the council must obtain the assent of the electors before proceeding; (e) a statement that (i) elector responses must be given in the form established by the council, (ii) elector response forms are available at the municipal hall, and (iii) the only persons entitled to sign the forms are the electors of the area to which the approval process applies; (f) the number of elector responses required to prevent the council from proceeding without the assent of the electors, determined in accordance with subsection (3); (g) other information required by regulation to be included ". Notice has been prepared (attached as Appendix 1) to meet all requirements of the Community Charter. Section 86 (3) of the Community Charter states that "For each alternative approval process, the Council must (a) establish the deadline for receiving elector responses, which must be at least 30 days after the second publication of the notice under subsection (2) (b) establish elector response forms, which: (i) may be designed to allow for only a single elector response on each form or for multiple elector responses, and (ii) must be available to the public at the municipal hall from the time of first publication until the deadline, (c) make a fair determination of the total number of electors of the area to which the approval process applies The following discussion addresses these requirements. Page 2 4. Elector Response Forms According to section 86 (7) of the Community Charter, the elector response form must include "the person's full name and residential address and, if applicable, the address of the property in relation to which the person is entitled to register as a non-resident property elector". The elector response forms have been prepared (attached as Appendix 2) to meet this requirement. A person must not sign an alternative approval process elector response form more than once and may not withdraw his or her name from the alternative approval process elector response form after the deadline for submission of the petitions has passed. Accurate copies of the elector response form may be made and used for signing. 5. Deadline for Receiving Elector Responses It is anticipated that the notices prepared under section 86 (2) of the Community Charter will be published in the February 5 and 12, 2014 editions of the Maple Ridge News and posted on the District website. Information packages including the notices, staff reports and elector response forms will be available upon request at Municipal Hall, and on the District website. We'll also provide copies of the response forms to the Leisure Centre, the ACT, and the Library. The legislation requires that response forms be submitted with original signatures. Elector response forms may be initially submitted as a PDF by email or by facsimile and then an original signed response submitted as soon as reasonably possible after the electronic submission was sent. Respecting these dates and the Charter provisions, it is recommended that the deadline for receiving elector responses at Municipal Hall be established as Monday, March 17, 2014 at 4:00 PM. This date is 34 calendar days after the last notice is published on February 12, 2014. After the deadline has passed, the Manager of Legislative Services must determine and certify whether elector approval has been obtained. If it has, then the request for the change of classification will be sent to the Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development. 6. Number of Electors The area to which the approval process applies is the entire District. Elections BC has maintained a continuous voters list for more than 70 years. Eligible citizens can register as voters through on-line registration, by visiting their local Service B.C. office or by submitting a registration form by mail, fax or email. Regular updates are also received from ICBC, Vital Statistics and Elections Canada. Elections BC staff conduct ongoing analysis of the quality of the data in the list. This combination of registration activities and analysis allows Elections BC to maintain a voters list that achieves a high level of currency and accuracy. The majority of Lower Mainland municipalities who have conducted an alternative approval process have used this source to determine the number of voters. Metro Vancouver also uses this source. This source was used in 2011 when elector approval was sought by the District for loan authorization bylaws. Staff recommends that this source be used again. As of December 24, 2013 the number of voters on the Elections BC list for the District of Maple Ridge is 53,745. The number of electors who must submit signed elector response forms in order to prevent the Council from adopting the loan authorization bylaws without the assent of the electors by voting using this number would be 5,375 (10% of voters). Page 3 CONCLUSION: Considering the above discussion, it is recommended that: 1. The Manager of Legislative Services be authorized to publish, in accordance with the Community Charter, the alternative approval process notices attached to this report as Appendix 1. 2. Elector response forms be in the form set out in Appendix 2 attached to this report. 3. The deadline for the submission of elector response forms be 4:00 p.m. on Monday, March 17, 2014. 4. A fair determination of the total number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge be 53,475. 5. That this report be made available to the public upon request. "Original si ned bv Ceri Marlo" Prepared by: Ceri Marlo, C.M.C. Manager of Legislative Services and Emergency Program "Original signed bv Paul Gill" Approved by: Paul Gill, B.B.A, C.G.A, F.R.M General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services "Original signed by J.L. Uim) Rule Concurrence J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Attachments (2) Page 4 APPENDIX 1 � DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE � � Notice of Elector Approval Process in relation to , Classification of Maple Ridge from a District Municipality to a City ❑eep Roots Greater Heiqhts The District of Maple Ridge gives notice that it is seeking approval of the electors to change the classification of Maple Ridge from a District Municipality to a City. By statute, to be considered a `City' a Municipality must have a population of over 5,000. The current population of Maple Ridge exceeds 77,000. There is a perception that the term `Municipality' is associated with small towns versus the designation `City' being associated with more urban communities. In terms of population, Maple Ridge ranks number 72 in population in Canada and number 16 in BC, based on the 2011 Census. Maple Ridge is in a transition from its rural roots to a strong urban core supporting new suburban developments. The term "District' is sometimes confused with the `School District' and a great many citizens already believe that the District is a`City' and refer to our Municipal Hall as `City Hall' in casual conversation. As we promote and market the community nationally and internationally the designation `City' will acknowledge the terminology used by our citizens, by similar sized communities in BC and better reflect our aspirations as a community. Elector Approval Council may apply to the Ministry of Community, Sport and Culture to change the classification of Maple Ridge from a District Municipality to a City unless at least 10% of the electors of the entire District of Maple Ridge sign elector response forms and submit them to the District by the deadline of 4:00 p.m. on March 17, 2014. If 10°/o of the electors sign and submit elector response forms by the deadline, Council must obtain the assent of the electors before proceeding. This approval process applies to the entire area of the District of Maple Ridge. The District estimates that 5,375 is the number of electors who must submit signed elector response forms in order to prevent Council from apply for a change of classification from a District Municipality to a City without the assent of the electors by voting. Elector responses must be in the form established by the District of Maple Ridge. These forms are available on request from the Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 or may be obtained by visiting the District web site at www.maplerid e.ca, The only persons entitled to sign the forms are electors of Maple Ridge. Copies of staff reports related to this matter are available for public inspection at the Municipal Hall, office of the Manager of Legislative Services, during regular business hours. Ceri Marlo Manager of Legislative Services District of Maple Ridge APPENDIX 2 � � � Classification of Maple Ridge from a District Municipality to a City � ALTERNATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS ELECTOR RESPONSE FORM ❑ecp Roo[s Greaier Nergh[s I am OPPOSED to the District of Maple Ridge proceeding with a request to the Ministry of Community, Sport and Culture to change the classification of Maple Ridge from a District Municipality to a City. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that: • I am eighteen years of age or older; and • I am a Canadian citizen; and • I have resided in British Columbia for at least the last six months; and • I have resided in the District of Maple Ridge for at least the last thirty days OR I am, or have been a registered owner of real property in the District of Maple Ridge and I have (if there is more than one registered owner) the written consent of a majority of the registered owners of that property to be the only person entitled to sign an elector response form as a non-resident property elector in relation to that property; and • I am not disqualified by the Local Government Act or any other enactment or otherwise disqualified by law from voting in location elections; and • I am entitled to sign this alternative approval process elector response form and have not previously signed an alternative approval process elector response form for the proposed bylaw. All alternative approval process elector response forms must be received by the Manager of Legislative Services, on or before 4:00 p.m. on Monday, March 17, 2014. Regular office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, statutory holidays excluded. Elector response forms may be initially submitted by facsimile or as a PDF by email. An original signed response must then be submitted to the Corporate Officer as soon as reasonably possible after the electronic submission was sent but no later than 4:00 p.m. March 17, 2014. Address for delivery or mail: 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Facsimile (fax) number: 604-467-7329 PDF submission address: clerks@mapleridge.ca Address of the property in Elector's Full Name Residential Address relation to which you are Signature of elector (Print - No initials) entitled to register as a non- resident property elector (if applicable) NOTE: A person must not sign any alternative approval process elector response form more than once and may not withdraw his or her name from the alternative approval process elector response form after the deadline for submission of the petitions has passed. Accurate copies of this elector response form may be made and used for signing. You must meet the requirements above in order to sign this form. The number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge is estimated to be 53,745. If 10°/o (5,375) of the estimated number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge sign an alternative approval process elector response form opposing the bylaw, Council will not be able to proceed without then receiving the assent of the electors. MAPLE RIDGE 6ritish Co[umhla T0: FROM: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: January 20, 2014 and Members of Council FILE N0: 0640-30-01 Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C.O.W SUBJECT: RESCIND MAPLE RIDGE POLICIES 4.01, 4.03 AND 4.11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission has been conducting an ongoing review of policies. At the January meeting, one District of Maple Ridge policy was identified as a Commission operational policy and two policies are no longer applicable. It is recommended that all three be rescinded and the attached Commission report provides the background details. RECOMMENDATION: That the following District of Maple Ridge Policies be rescinded: Policy 4.01 - Maple Ridge Seasonal Allocation Policy 4.03 - Maple Ridge Campsite Reservations Policy 4.11 - Aerobic Safety - Exercise Classes `Original signed by Kelly Swift' Prepared by: Kelly Swift General Manager, Community Development, Parks and Recreation Services `Original signed byJim Rule' Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer :ik Attachment - PLS Commission Reports 2014-01-09 1151 / � Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission Report � -������"�f REGULAR MEETING �� yll�Q�'�S January 9, 2014 PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES SUBJECT: SEASONAL SPORTS FIELD ALLOCATION POLICY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The field allocation policy has been the subject of considerable discussion with the Sports Field User Association over the last couple of years. The following field allocation policy is recommended by the Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Sports Field User Association RECOMMENDATION: That Commission Policy P125 - Seasonal Sport Field Allocation be adopted and further that the District of Maple Ridge Seasonal Allocation Policy 4.01 be rescinded. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The current sports field allocation policy was approved in 1993. Since this policy was approved there has been the addition of three artificial turf fields and updating of several grass fields to "Class A" sports fields. These additions and upgrades have dramatically affected the way the current field inventory is used and allocated. PLS staff have facilitated several discussions with the Sports Field User Association to work towards the creation of an updated policy. The Association was unable to come to a consensus on how to draft the policy and asked PLS staff to draft an updated policy and bring it back to the group for discussion. This draft was presented to the Association on June 25, 2013 and there was considerable discussion and feedback. The Association's input and feedback resulted in several changes and additions made to the policy which was then approved by the Association at their November 18, 2013 meeting. b) Desired Outcome: The Sports Field User Association understand the need to update the current policy to more accurately reflect the inventory of sports fields currently being allocated as well as provide a framework for future allocation with expansion of facilities, leagues and new and emerging/expanding sports. c) Strategic Alignment: A review and updating of the Sports Field Allocation Policy is identified in the Parks and Facilities business plan. This review included a comparison of field allocation policies with other lower mainland communities. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The attached Sports Field Allocation policy provides for an equitable field distribution for all sports users not only for league play but also provides allocation for skill development for all ages. It also supports "Sport for Life "philosophies, the Canadian Sport for Life Community, and the Canadian Long Term Athlete Development Programs. \\mr.corp\docs\CDPR-Ad m in\01-Adm in\0540-Council-Com mittees\20-PLSC\02-Agendas\Regular\2014\2014-01- 09\PLSC_Seasonal_Sport_Field_ Allocation_Policy.doc #1 e) Interdepartmentallmplications: The attached policy brings the field allocation policy more in line and up-to-date with the PLS allocation policy by identifying the categories of use for allocation preference. f) Policy Implications: The attached policy will replace the current District of Maple Ridge Seasonal Field Allocation Policy No. 4.01. g) Alternatives: The alternative would be to retain the existing allocation policy; however this does not accurately reflect how our current inventory of sports fields is being allocated. With the addition of the three new artificial turf fields the current allocation policy does not meet the needs of the sports users for practice times. CONCLUSIONS: The Sports Field User Association has provided considerable assistance and input to staff in determining what would be a fair and equitable allocation of the sports fields in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows and recommends the attached policy for approval. 'Original signed by Geoff Mallory' Prepared By: Geoff Mallory, Manager Parks & Open Space `Original signed by David Boag' Approved By: David Boag Director Parks & Facilities `Original signed by Kelly Swift' Approved By: Kelly Swift General Manager, Community Development Parks & Recreation Services :gm Attachment: Policy P125 Seasonal Sport Field Allocation \\mr.corp\docs\CDPR-Ad m in\01-Adm in\0540-Council-Com mittees\20-PLSC\02-Agendas\Regular\2014\2014-01- 09\PLSC_Seasonal_Sport_Field_ Allocation_Policy.doc #2 �' � �Iff � �eado�vs PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES Title: SEASONAL SPORT FIELD ALLOCATION Authority: Operational Approval: PLS Commission Policy Statement: POLICY MANUAL Policy No. Supercedes: Effective Date: Review Date: P125 DMR 4.01 2014-01-09 2014-01-09 Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services allocate available sports fields to sports users in a fair and equitable manner that maximizes the appropriate use to ensure a wide range of sports and activities on safe, durable sports fields. PURPOSE: To provide a framework for the fair and equitable allocation of sports fields provided by the District of Maple Ridge, City of Pitt Meadows and School District No. 42. Allocation and field use is managed by Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services to ensure fields are fully utilized while maintaining the integrity of the field assets. Citizens enjoy considerable benefits from participation in athletic activities which take place on sport fields and are organized by community sporting groups. Consequently, there is increasing demand from organized sports groups to use these sports fields for a variety of sports. It is important to develop a policy that will allow for the fair allocation of fields for regular users, to ensure access for new and emerging sports, to allow for smaller clubs to expand their programs, and to ensure gender equity in field allocation. ALLOCATION The following formulas are used to determine allocated field time for regular users: a) Svnthetic fields: Total number of annual hours available to be allocated (H) multiplied by number of registrations (R) (individuals from the previous year from each eligible club based as a percentage of overall users). Average hours to be distributed over 3 allocation periods (August-November, December-March, April-July). Allocation periods are determined based on season of play required for each sport. (H x R= 3) Season of play for each sport will be considered and the corresponding allocation hour's entitlement will be distributed equitably over the season of play for each sport, i.e. some sports may benefit from having their allocated time within one of the above allocation periods, whereas larger clubs may benefit from year round access. P125 - Seasonal Sport Field Allocation b) Grass fields: Number of registrations (individuals from the previous year) divided by maximum number of participant/group (or team) equals number of groups (or teams) requiring field time. Allocation to be divided into 2 allocation periods (Fall/Winter and Spring/Summer) Client and Programming Priority Traditional sports seasons users are given priority during their traditional sports season; e.g.; baseball, softball and slow pitch shall have priority in spring summer allocations where ball diamonds are located. Allocation will be based on their requirements for that period, remaining field inventory will be allocated based on new and emerging sports or new leagues. Soccer, football, lacrosse, and rugby shall have priority in fall and winter on fields that can accommodate their play. When applying these formulas, the following criteria will be used: a) Client: 1) First priority: Commission Programs and Special/Community Events and School District No. 42 Programs 2) Second Priority: Community Sports Associations 3) Third Priority: Casual User 4) Fourth Priority: Commercial b) Programming: 1) Community Special Events 2) Tournaments (Sanctioned by club, league, Provincial or higher) 3) League play - Community 4) Practice/Development - Community 5) For-profit skill development programs When Applying This Formula, Consider The Following: • The maximum number of participants per group and the weekly requirements for practices and games are determined by the various Provincial Sport Organizations (PSO's). Allocation for practices and games should be distributed equitably to all users in an attempt to meet the minimum requirements of PSO's before additional practice or development time is allocated. • Where there are requests from more than one community sports group for the same field allocation historical use/allocation will be considered provided that the field use is being maximized. • In keeping with the "Active for Life" model - facilitating lifelong participation, field time will be allocated to youth community sport organizations for both skill development and competition and to adult community sport organizations for both skill development and for competition. • The allocation of all-weather sand/gravel fields, and School District No. 42 fields must be fully utilized before additional grass fields or synthetic turf field time will be considered. Consideration of field suitability will be given to sports where practice cannot be accommodated on sand/gravel all-weather fields. \\m r.corp\Docs\CA\01-Ad m i n\0550-Cou nci I-Mtgs-Pu bl ic\20-COW\01-Gen\Agendas\2014\2014-01- 20_COW\CDPR\P125_Seasonal_Sport_Field_Allocation.docx P125 - Seasonal Sport Field Allocation A minimum of 4.5°/o of available field time must be available for public use and for emerging sport or new leagues which will be allocated on an as-needed basis by Parks and Leisure Services. On synthetic fields, an equivalent of two hours per field shall be retained by Parks and Leisure Services and can be distributed based on the greatest gain for the sporting community. All available hours can be allocated at one field or dispersed amongthe synthetic fields. • Once the minimum allocation requirements are met, any remaining field time(s)/inventory may be allocated using the "Client and Programming Priority" and the specific needs to foster and increase active participation. • Once the minimum requirements for field time equals available field time, all organizations will need to review whether they take on additional registrations. If any group still wishes to take additional registrations, they can make application for additional field time and will be advised if there is additional field time to accommodate their registration. • Gender Equity principles apply to all allocations. Girls shall have equal access to the allocation of fields as boys. • The majority of an organization's membership must reside in or own a business in Maple Ridge or Pitt Meadows. FIELD MANAGEMENT Parks and Leisure Services manage the field inventory and will make every effort to ensure they are in playable condition and available to support the various sports in all seasons. In collaboration with the community sports users Parks and Leisure Services will work to maximize the use and configuration of the fields while minimizing the field use impacts on the health and viability of the fields. Any changes/additions to field configurations will require the written approval from Parks and Leisure Services. The potential negative impact of field use is greatest during the fall/winter months when the grass fields are dormant and unable to recover from excessive use. In order to help ensure the fields remain useable through the dormant season the following limitations will apply; • A maximum of 6 games per week to be played on grass fields (to a maximum of 150 games per season). If any sport requires use above these limits and the field conditions can accommodate more play there must be consultation with the Manager Parks & Open Space and any exceptions must be approved in writing. A game in the context of this policy is - 90 minutes of play of regulation soccer, or equivalent time for mini or micro soccer - 100 minutes for field lacrosse - 90 minutes of play for rugby - 4 quarters of football - 9 innings of ball CLOSURES AND FIELD STATUS • Closure/cancellation: The decision to order a closure of a field or cancellation of permitted play is made when the fields are considered unsafe or when there is significant potential for damage that could affect other permitted uses. \\m r.corp\Docs\CA\01-Ad m i n\0550-Cou nci I-Mtgs-Pu bl ic\20-COW\01-Gen\Agendas\2014\2014-01- 20_COW\CDPR\P125_Seasonal_Sport_Field_Allocation.docx P125 - Seasonal Sport Field Allocation • Closure and cancellatio n decisions can be determined by; - On site Municipal Staff and the Manager Parks & Open Space - Designated game officials (before or during the game and on a game to game basis only) - Authorized Club representatives • Each organization's rainouts are handled within their allotted time or through negotiations with the Manager, Parks & Open Space. • Field sizes and layouts are predetermined through consultation between organizations and the Manager Parks and Open Space. PROVISION OF SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT • Where additional services are requested, such as moving in extra bleachers, snow-fencing, special maintenance requests over and above the normal park standard, a charge for total labour (wage and burden) and equipment will be applied to the permit applicant. Parks and Leisure Services, upon review of the permit application, reserve the right to require the applicant to pay the cost of municipal staff at any facility. \\m r.corp\Docs\CA\01-Ad m i n\0550-Cou nci I-Mtgs-Pu bl ic\20-COW\01-Gen\Agendas\2014\2014-01- 20_COW\CDPR\P125_Seasonal_Sport_Field_Allocation.docx 4 � 1VI�4PLE RIDGE In�pQaad 12 Sep�6er, 1874 TITLE: POLICY NO. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE SEASONAL FIELD ALLOCATION - REGULAR USE r.� APPROVAL DATE: June 21, 1993 POLICY STATEMENT: The following formulas are used to determine allocated field time for regular users: a) Number of registrations (individuals from the previous year) divided by maximum number of participants/group (or team) equals number of groups (or teams) requiring field time. b) Number of groups requiring field time x hours allowed per group equals number of hours allocated to organization. When applying these formulas the following criteria will be utilized: • Field time will be allocated to minor sport organizations for both skill development and competition, and adult groups for competition only. • A minimum of 4.5% of available field time must be available for open public use. This amount should not be less than 80 hours per week. • Each organization's rain-outs and tournaments are handled within their allotted time or through negotiations with other groups. • If the groups effected by a field closure cannot be accommodated within un-booked field time, then the loss of field time will be distributed among similar user groups (i.e. minor sport groups, adult sport groups). • Should there be field time available after the minimum requirements are met, it will be allocated as requested, to current users with increased registrations or waiting lists or to new organizations which have not previously been accomodated. • Once the minimum requirement for field time equals the available field time, all arganizations will be asked not to take additional registrations. If any group still wishes to take additional registrations, it is with the understanding that there is no additional field time and that their group will no longer receive the recommended hours based on the above formulas. PURPOSE: Citizens enj oy considerable benefits from participation in athletic activities which take place on sport fields and are organized by local non profit amateur sporting groups. Field use is approaching the saturation point for the available fields. It is important to develop a policy that will allow for the fair allocation of fields for regular users based on the level of participation by citizens (registered participants) in the activities of the various organizations. A system is required to vary allocations as these organizations grow (or shrink) and new groups develop. DEFINITIONS: Date Printed: 2014-OI-16 Page 1 of 2 Policy 4.01 Municipal and School District #42 fields are allocated under this policy. The maximum number of participants per group and the weekly requirements for practices and competition are determined by the various organizations during discussions with the Parks and Leisure Services Department, and allow for maximum use without compromising safety or quality for the participants. Should additional requests result in a conflicts with other organizations, the groups involved will meet to discuss alternatives. Organizations should limit registration to that received in the previous year and take a waiting list for additional participants until additional field times are made available. A waiting list would indicate the level of citizen interest in a particular organization's activities and provide guidance for the distribution of new resources (field time) as they become available. Every year registration statistics (and player rosters) will be requested from organizations wishing to request field time. Major changes (reductions) in registration will be reflected in the reduced allocation of field time to accommodate increases in other groups including new organizations. Preference will be given to organizations with a maj oriry of players who reside in Maple Ridge or Pitt Meadows. Date Printed: 2014-OI-16 Page 2 of 2 Policy 4.01 PRRIiS € L SUBJECT: ��,� '�Iti'S �l1RE SERVICES COMMISSION POLICY REVIEWS Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission Report REGULAR MEETING January 9, 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 2013-2014 Business Plan includes a review of Commission policies. This report continues with the policy review process, recommending that the policies listed below be approved or rescinded as required. Part of the review also includes some housekeeping changes such as renumbering the policies. RECOMMENDATION: That the following Commission policies be approved as amended: • P101 - Independent Support Workers in Parks & Leisure Services Programs • P104 - PLS Commission Appeals Process • P122 - Sport Field Closure/Damage Deposit And further that the following Commission policy be rescinded: • Dogs on Dykes, October 1995 And further that a recommendation be sent to Maple Ridge Council that the following policies be rescinded: • District of Maple Ridge Policy 4.03 - Maple Ridge Campsite Reservations • District of Maple Ridge Policy 4.11- Aerobic Safety - Exercise Classes DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The 2013 Business Plan included an action to review Commission policies. This report includes a group of policies to come forward for review. A brief summary of each is described below: 1. P101 - Independent Support Worker in Parks & Leisure Services Programs To be consistent with the recently approved independent personal trainer policy, the name was changed from Private Support Worker to Independent Support Worker. The underlying premise guiding this policy remains unchanged and reflects current practice while providing clear direction to staff. It is recommended that Policy P101 be approved as amended. 2. P104 - PLS Commission Appeals Process The procedural steps in the process were removed from the policy statement. The underlying premise guidingthis policy remains unchanged and reflects current practices while providing clear direction to staff. It is recommended that Policy P104 be approved as amended. \\m r.corp\Docs\CA\01-Adm in\0550-Cou ncil-Mtgs-Pu blic\20-COW\01-Gen\Agendas\2014\2014-01- 20_COW\CDPR\PLSC_Policy_Review_2014-01-09.doc #1 3. P122 - Sport Field Closure/Damage Deposit The policy was updated to include item (g) and renumbered. The underlying premise guiding this policy remains unchanged and reflects current practice while providing clear direction to staff. It is recommended that Policy P122 be approved as amended. 4. Commission Policy - Dogs on Dykes This Commission policy was developed in October 1995 and is no longer relevant as it conflicts with the Parks Bylaw. It is recommended that this policy be rescinded. 5. District of Maple Ridge Policy #4.03 - Maple Ridge Campsite Reservations The campground no longer exists and should a new campground be added in the future, a new policy would be developed to meet the needs at that time. It is recommended that this policy be rescinded. 6. District of Maple Ridge Policy #4.11 - Aerobic Safety - Exercise Classes The terminology used for Aerobic Exercise classes is now Group Fitness classes. All drop-in group fitness classes and registered fitness/wellness programs for land and water are managed, planned and implemented by various contract service providers. The contractor and employees and/or subcontractors facilitate the individual programs and are contractually held to consistent safety certifications/requirements as noted in the Contract for Services Agreement. An RCMP security clearance is also required prior to start of work for the contractor and all employees or sub-contractors. As the programs have changed and safety requirements are now built into the Commission contracts, it is recommended that this policy be rescinded. b) Desired Outcome: To ensure that the policies that guide Commission and staff are relevant and up to date. c) Strategic Alignment: Policy development aligns with the Governance strategic direction by ensuring transparent processes and citizen access to information and opportunities for engagement in decision- making processes. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: Having policies in place provides citizens and community groups with clear and transparent processes which they can apply to their circumstances when needed. \\m r.corp\Docs\CA\01-Adm in\0550-Cou ncil-Mtgs-Pu blic\20-COW\01-Gen\Agendas\2014\2014-01- 20_COW\CDPR\PLSC_Policy_Review_2014-01-09.doc #2 CONCLUSIONS: Staff recommends that the above polices be approved as amended or rescinded to ensure that policies are meeting the current needs. "Original signed by Kelly Swift" Prepared By: Kelly Swift General Manager, Community Development Parks & Recreation Services ik Attachments: • P101 Independent Support Workers in PLS Programs • P101 Private Support Worker, September 9, 2004 • P104 Commission Appeals Process 2014 and 2008 • P122 Sport Field Closure/Damage Deposits 2014 and 2005 • PLSC Policy Dogs on Dykes, October 1995 • Maple Ridge Policy 4.03 - Maple Ridge Campsite Reservations May 17, 1993 • Maple Ridge Policy 4.11- Aerobic Safety - Exercise Classes January 10, 1994 \\m r.corp\Docs\CA\01-Adm in\0550-Cou ncil-Mtgs-Pu blic\20-COW\01-Gen\Agendas\2014\2014-01- 20_COW\CDPR\PLSC_Policy_Review_2014-01-09.doc #3 - ;f�, � MAPLE RIDGE Incorporzled 12 September, 1874 TITLE: POLICY NO. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE CAMPSITE RESERT�ATIONS ,r� APPROVAL DATE: May 17, 1993 POLICY STATEMENT: 1. The Maple Ridge campsite operates under a reservation system. 2. Reservations made 14 days or more in advance of arrival must be confirmed within 14 days with payment of 50% of the total fee; non confirmation will result in cancellation of the reservation. 3. Those made within 14 days of expected arrival do not require a deposit. 4. Bookings for weekends shall include at least Friday and Saturday nights. 5. No reservations are accepted after 12:00 noon for the same day. All reservations are held until 4:00 p.m. on the day of arrival, unless other arrangements have been made. 6. Unreserved spaces may be booked on an "as available" basis after closure of reservations for a given day. 7. Refunds for cancelled bookings are subject to a service charge: refunds are not available for cancellations made less than 48 hours before date. PURPOSE: This policy has been established to better regulate use of the campsite and reduce disappointment for visitors by providing for assured accommodation, particularly during periods of heavy use. Implementation details are set out in Procedure Na FBO-17. Date Printed: 2014-01-16 Page 1 of I Policy 4.03 - ;f�, � MAPLE RIDGE Incorporzled 12 September, 1874 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TITLE: POLICY NO. APPROVAL DATE: AEROBIC SAFETY — EXERCISE CLASSES 4.11 January 10, 1994 POLICY STATEMENT: Staff inembers who are instructing aerobic fitness classes are required to have a minimum of safety oriented first-aid certification and must hold current certification as a qualified fitness leader (recognized by YM/YWCA or BCRPA). PURPOSE: Aerobic Fitness Classes should be considered as both enjoyable and an opportunity to improve ones physical health. Preventative procedures should be practised to ensure a safe facility and activity. DEFINITIONS: Precautions are guidelines for the participants and the responsibility of both the Instructors and the Recreation Coordinators. It should be stressed to the participants through the Instructor that "common sense" should dictate the level of participation. "It doesn't have to hurt to work - if something hurts, participants should be encouraged to stop and slow down to a comfortable pace and use the Instructor as a resource person." Before commencement of each class, the Fitness Instructor should review the standard safety procedures. REFERENCE: Maple Ridge Parks & Recreation Policy and Procedure Manual Section: Safety File #: SAF-16 Date Printed: 2014-01-16 Page 1 of I Policy 4.11