Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-04-12 Workshop Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA April 12, 2010 9:00 a.m. Blaney Room, 1St Floor, Municipal Hall The purpose of the Council Workshop is to review and discuss policies and other items of interest to Council. Although resolutions may be passed at this meeting, the intent is to make a consensus decision to send an item to Council for debate and vote or refer the item back to staff for more information or clarification. REMINDERS Date, 2010 Closed Council following Workshop Committee of the Whole Meeting 1:00 p.m. 1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 2. MINUTES - March 22, 2010 3. PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 3.1 Metro Vancouver Commerce - 2010 Olympic Business Initiative • Phil Heard, CEO, Metro Vancouver Commerce/VEDC Note: Item 3.2 has been scheduled for 10:00 a.m. 3.2 Pitt River Bridge and Mary Hill Interchange Project, Gateway Program • Geoff Freer, Executive Director; Rob Ahola, Project Director; Gord Ruffo, Project Manager; Lori Alexander, Manager, Community Relations 4. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS 4.1 Silver Valley Infrastructure Update Presentation by the Director of Planning and the Municipal Engineer Council Workshop April 12, 2010 Page 2 of 4 4.2 Matrix Update Staff report dated April 7, 2010 recommending that the Council Matrix which includes items scheduled to be before Council up to September 30, 2010 be adopted. 4.3 Affordable Housing Strategy Staff report dated April 8, 2010 recommending that proposed timing of the affordable housing policy be endorsed. 4.4 South Haney Neighbourhood Initiative Staff report dated April 8, 2010 recommending that reallocation of funds from the affordable housing strategy budget to the neighbourhood development initiative in the South Haney area be authorized. 5. CORRESPONDENCE The following correspondence has been received and requires a response. Staff is seeking direction from Council on each item. Options that Council may consider include: a) Acknowledge receipt of correspondence and advise that no further action will be taken. b) Direct staff to prepare a report and recommendation regarding the subject matter. c) Forward the correspondence to a regular Council meeting for further discussion. d) Other. Once direction is given the appropriate response will be sent. 5.1 Ministry of Community and Rural Development - Local Government Elections Taskforce Letter dated January 29, 2010 from Bill Bennett, Minister of Community and Rural Development and Harry Nyce, President, Union of British Columbia Municipalities requesting feedback on local government election issues. From the Council Workshop Meeting of February 15, 2010 Council Workshop April 12, 2010 Page 3 of 4 5.2 Government of British Columbia - Water Act Letter dated February 24, 2010 from John Slater, MLA Boundary-Similkameen, Parliamentary Secretary for Water Supply and Allocation requesting feedback on the document titled "British Columbia's Water Act Modernization Discussion Paper" as attached. G. BRIEFING ON OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST/QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 8. ADJOURNMENT Checked by- Date: d Council Workshop April 12, 2010 Page 4 of 4 Rules for Holding a Closed Meeting A part of a council meeting may be closed to the public if the subject matter being considered relates to one or more of the following: (a) personal information about an identifiable individual who holds or is being considered for r a position as an officer, employee or agent of the municipality or another position appointed by the municipality; (b) personal information about an identifiable individual who is being considered for a municipal award or honour, or who has offered to provide a gift to the municipality on condition of anonymity; (c) labour relations or employee negotiations; (d) the security of property of the municipality; (e) the acquisition, disposition or expropriation of land or improvements, if the council considers that disclosure might reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality; (f) law enforcement, if the council considers that disclosure might reasonably be expected to harm the conduct of an investigation under or enforcement of an enactment; (g) litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality; (h) an administrative tribunal hearing or potential administrative tribunal hearing affectingthe municipality, other than a hearing to be conducted by the council or a delegate of council (i) the receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor -client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose; Q) information that is prohibited or information that if it were presented in a document would be prohibited from disclosure under section 21 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act; (k) negotiations and related discussions respecting the proposed provision of a municipal service that are at their preliminary stages and that, in the view of the council, could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality if they were held in public; (1) discussions with municipal officers and employees respecting municipal objectives, measures and progress reports for the purposes of preparing an annual report under section 98 [annual municipal report] (m) a matter that, under another enactment, is such that the public may be excluded from the meeting; (n) the consideration of whether a council meeting should be closed under a provision of this subsection of subsection (2) (o) the consideration of whether the authority under section 91 (other persons attending closed meetings) should be exercised in relation to a council meeting. (p) information relating to iota[ government partioipation in provincial negotiations with First Nations, where an agreement provides that the information is to be kept confidential. Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: April 7, 2010 and Members of Council FILE NO: 0530-01 Chief Administrative Officer Council Matrix Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: ATTN: Council Workshop A matrix listing the key items that Council wished to focus on for the period of January 1 through June 30, 2010 was adopted at the January 18, 2010 Council Workshop. Attached to this report as Appendix I is that list showing the status of each item. Attached as Appendix II is a list of priority items dated April 7, 2010 which includes items scheduled to be before Council up to September 30, 2010. Staff will make every effort to meet the dates outlined but it should be noted that the dates listed may be altered depending upon availability of information and personnel. RECOMMENDATION: That the Council Matrix attached as Appendix II to the staff report dated April 7, 2010 be adopted. DISCUSSION: The matrix was developed to track key items for Council. The matrix lists those items that are of particular interest to Council but are only a small fraction of the work that occurs at the District on a daily basis. Since the January 18 meeting, Council has added items onto the list and those items are noted. Council has been extremely busy over the last few months and twenty-six items on the matrix have been completed since January 1, 2010. 4 Prepared by: Geri Marlo, C.M.C. Conthief rrence by: J.L. Rule Manager of Legislative Services Administrative Officer Approved 6 . Paul Gill, B.B.A, C.G.A, F.R.M General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services /cm Page 1 of 1 4.2 Council Work Schedule Matrix 2010 (as at January 6, 2010) - to be scheduled Appendix I ITEM DIVISION RESPONSIBLE SCHEDULED DATE BEFORE COUNCIL MEETING STATUS 1 Albion Concept Plan PW &DS January 11 W/S complete 2 Regional Growth Strategy PW &DS January 11 W/S complete 3 Matrix Update Clerk's January 18 W/S complete * 4 Run of River Power Generation Clerk's January 18 W/S Not required; project cancelled 5 Fraser Valley Regional Library Update Clerk's January 18 COW complete 6 GVA Parking Tax C&FS January 18 W/S complete 7 BC Assessment Update C&FS January 18 W/S complete 8 Aquifer Signage PW &DS January 25 W/S complete ** 9 Economic Development Presentation - Mike Shardlow, Chair Economic Dev February Council complete - February 9 * 10 Metro Vancouver - Waste to Energy - Fred Nenninger, MV Clerk's February W/S complete - February 1 11 SPCA Shelter Update C&FS February COW Council complete - January 25 complete - January 26 12 RCMP Contract Update C&FS February W/S complete - Feb 1 COW 13 Area Planning Policy Report PW &DS February 01 W/S scheduled for Sept 20 * 14 Justice Institute Update . C&FS February 01 W/S complete 15 224 Street and Lougheed Hwy Improvements PW &DS February 01 W/S complete 16 jAlbion Concept Plan Process PW &DS February 15 W/S complete * 17 Fraser Health Authority Update Clerk's February 15 W/S complete ** 18 Performance Measurements, See -It Demo Admin February 15 W/S complete 19 E-Comm Dispatch Services C&FS February 15 W/S complete * 20 Dog Park Implementation CDP&R February 22 W/S complete * 21 TransLink Update PW &DS February 22 W/S confirmed for June 14 ** 22 Expansion of transit service PW &DS February 22 W/S confirmed for June 14 ** 23 Ambulance Response Time C&FS February 22 W/S complete 24 Opening of 240th Street Bridge PW &DS February 22 240th St complete * 25 Legal Seminar Clerk's February March W/S complete - March 01 ** 26 Pavement Rehabilitation Program PW &DS March 01 W/S Phase I - complete Phase II - with FP update 27 Dedicated Bus Lane - Pitt River Bridge -Golden Ears Bridge - Ministry of Transportation PW &DS March 01 W/S confirmed for April 12 28 Affordable Housing Strategy update CDP&R March 22 W/S complete 29 RCMP Update C&FS March 22 COW complete - Feb 1 30 Parks and Leisure Services Master Plan Funding Envelope CDP&R March 22 W/S scheduled for April 19 14/01/2010 11:43 AM Council Work Schedule Matrix 2010 (as at January 6, 2010) - to be scheduled Appendix I ITEM DIVISION RESPONSIBLE SCHEDULED DATE BEFORE COUNCIL MEETING STATUS ** 31 Acquisition of Strategic Properties C&FS April W/S scheduled for July 5 32 Financial Update C&FS April W/S scheduled for May 10 33 Matrix Update Admin April 12 W/S 34 Fire Department Update C&FS April 12 W/S presentation at COW x* 35 Composting Food Waste PW &DS April 19 W/S 36 Abernethy Way Improvements Update PW &DS April 19 W/S scheduled for April 26 37 School District 42/P&LS Master Agreement CDP&R April 26 W/S scheduled for May 3 38 Investigate Storm Water Utility ! PW &DS April 26 W/S Ischeduled for May 3 39 Tax Rates - residential vs commercial/ industrial C&FS April 26 W/S scheduled for May 10 40 1 Living Water Smart Admin May 03 W S ** 41 1 Parks and Leisure Services Master Plan Finalization CDP&R May 10 W/S TBD ** 42 Garburator Regulation PW &DS May 17 W/S 43 Capital Works Update PW &DS May 17 W/S 44 224 Street and Lougheed Hwy Improvements PW &DS May 17 W/S scheduled for April 12 COW 45 Sewer to Correctional Facilities Update PW &DS June 07 W/S Ischeduled for May 10 46 Matrix Update Admin June 21 W/S * 47 School District - Post Secondary Institutions Economic Dev June 21 W/S tentative * 48 Meeting with Agricultural Land Commission Admin Declined ALC Declined ** 49 Meeting with School District No. 42 at School District Office Clerk's TBD SD 42 Require confirmed date from ISchool District 50 Regional Growth Strategy Review of Plan PW &DS TBD W/S Requires updated status from Metro Vancouver Legend Abbreviation Admin Administration CDP&R Community Development Parks & Recreation C&FS Corporate and Financial Services PW&DS Public Works & Development Services TBD Date of Topic to be determined NOTES: * = Items passed by resolution of Council ** = Items from Business Planning 2009/2010 Dates listed may be altered depending on availability of information and personnel 1410112010 11:43 AM Council Work Schedule Matrix 2010 (January 6, 2010 - September 30, 2010) Appendix II ITEM DIVISION RESPONSIBLE SCHEDULED DATE BEFORE COUNCIL MEETING STATUS 1 Albion Concept Plan PW &DS January 11 W/S complete 2 Regional Growth Strategy PW &DS January 11 W/S complete 3 Matrix Update Clerk's January 18 W/S complete 4 Run of River Power Generation Clerk's January 18 W/S Not required; project cancelled 5 Fraser Valley Regional Library Update Clerk's January 18 COW complete 6 GVA Parking Tax C&FS January 18 W/S complete 7 BC Assessment Update C&FS January 18 W/S complete 8 Aquifer Signage PW &DS January 25 W/S complete 9 SPCA Shelter Update C&FS January 25 January 26 COW Council complete complete 10 Metro Vancouver - Waste to Energy - Fred Nennin er MV Clerk's February 01 W/S complete 11 RCMP Update C&FS February 01 COW complete 12 RCMP Contract Update C&FS February 01 COW complete 13 Justice Institute Update C&FS February 01 W/S complete 14 224 Street and Lougheed Hwy Improvements PW &DS February 01 W/S complete 15 Economic Development Presentation - Mike Shardlow, Chair Economic Dev February 09 Council complete 16 Albion Concept Plan Process PW &DS February 15 W/S complete 17 Fraser Health Authority Update Clerk's February 15 W/S complete 18 Performance Measurements, See -It Demo Admin February 15 W/S complete 19 E-Comm Dispatch Services C&FS February 15 W/S complete 20 Dog Park Implementation CDP&R February 15 COW complete 21 Ambulance Response Time C&FS February 22 W/S complete 22 Opening of 240th Street Bridge PW &DS February 22 240th St complete 23 Legal Seminar Clerk's March 01 W/S complete 24 Pavement Rehabilitation Program (Phase I) PW &DS March 01 W/S Phase I - complete Phase II - with FP update 25 Pitt River/Golden Ears Bridges (Min of Transportation -Gateway) Dedicated Bus PW &DS April 12 W/S 26 Affordable Housing Strategy update CDP&R April 12 W/S * 27 Silver Valley Infrastructure Update PW &DS April 12 W/S 28 Matrix Update Admin April 12 W/S 29 1 Fire Department Update C&FS April 12 COW 0810412010 12:58 PM Council Work Schedule Matrix 2010 (January 6, 2010 - September 30, 2010) Appendix II ITEM DIVISION RESPONSIBLE SCHEDULED DATE BEFORE COUNCIL MEETING STATUS 30 224 Street and Lougheed Hwy Improvements -Award of Contract PW &DS April 12 COW 31 Parks and Leisure Services Master Plan Funding Envelope CDP&R April 19 W/S 32 Composting Food Waste &Recycling Update Admin/SEI April 19 W/S 33 Abernethy Way Improvements Update PW &DS April 26 W/S 34 Accessibility Committee & Universal Design Guidelines CDP&R April 26 W/S 35 School District 42/P&LS Master Agreement CDP&R May 03 W/S 36 Investigate Storm Water Utility PW &DS May 03 W/S 37 Lease Options/Urban Renewal Clerk's May 03 W/S 38 Living Water Smart Admin/ Sustainability May 03 W/S 39 Low Flush Toilet Program PW &DS May 10 W/S 40 Tax Rates - residential vs commercial/ industrial C&FS May 10 W/S 41 Financial Update C&FS May 10 W/S Further information is required to confirm date 42 Sewer to Correctional Facilities Update PW &DS May 10 W/S 43 Garburator Regulation PW &DS May 17 W/S 44 Capital Works Update PW &DS May 17 W/S 45 Emergency Program Update Clerk's May 17 W/S 46 Tourism Update Admin May 17 W/S 47 Cat Licensing PW &DS May 17 W/S 48 Regional Growth Strategy Review of Plan PW &DS May TBD W/S Requires updated status from Metro Vancouver upon receipt of next draft of RGS * 49 Agricultural groundwater impact assessment PW &DS June 07 W/S 50 Aquifer Signage Update PW &DS June 07 W/S 51 Our Sprit Our Town Update Admin June 07 W/S 52 TransLink Update PW &DS June 14 W/S 53 Expansion of transit service PW &DS June 14 W/S 54 RCMP Update C&FS June 14 W/S 56 South Haney Neighbourhood Development Initiative Update CDP&R June 14 W/S tentative 56 Albion Area Plan update PW &DS June 14 W/S 57 Project and Development Tour PW &DS June 14 W/S 08/04/2010 12:58 PM Council Work Schedule Matrix 2010 (January 6, 2010 - September 30, 2010) Appendix II ITEM DIVISION RESPONSIBLE SCHEDULED DATE BEFORE COUNCIL MEETING STATUS 58 Matrix Update Admin June 21 W/S 59 School District - Post Secondary Admin/SEI June 21 W/S tentative 60 Dyking Districts Update PW &DS July 05 W/S 61 Acquisition of Strategic Properties C&FS July 05 W/S 62 E3 Fleet Program PW &DS July 12 W/S 63 SPCA Discussion - Animal Services Council C&FS July 19 W/S 64 RCMP Contract Update C&FS September 13 W/S 65 Area Planning Policy Report PW &DS September 20 W/S February 9 - deferred to future Council Workshop ** 66 SPCA Shelter Construction Update C&FS September 20 W/S 67 224 and Lougheed Highway Improvements Update PW &DS September 20 W/S 68 Financial Performance Update C&FS September 27 W/S 69 Meeting with School District No. 42 at School District Office Clerk's September SD 42 tentative 70 Parks and Leisure Services Master Plan Finalization CDP&R TBD W/S 71 First Nations Communities CDP&R TBD W/S Legend Abbreviation Admin (Administration SEI Strategic Economic Initiatives CDP&R Community Development Parks & Recreation C&FS Corporate and Financial Services PW&DS Public Works & Development Services TBD Date of Topic to be determined NOTES: * = Items passed by resolution of Council subsequent to January 18, 2010 ** = Item requested at February 15, 2010 Committee of the Whole 08/04/2010 12:58 PM 4 MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: 9 %]► SUBJECT District of Maple Ridge His worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council General Manager: Community Development, Parks and Recreation Affordable Housing Strategy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DATE: 2010 04 08 FILE NO: ATTN: Council Workshop The 2010 work plan includes development of an updated affordable housing strategy/policy for the District. Such a document will include a review of key community indicators to establish what is needed and what policies are already in place, highlighting the gaps that need to be filled and prioritizing Council's future work on this subject. Council has budgeted $75,000 for the project. The intent of this memorandum is to: a. identify the work the District has already completed on this subject b. discuss the timing for the strategy development c. review the budget and propose reallocation of some of the available funding to another priority project The Social Planning Advisory Committee considered this subject at its last meeting and wishes to offer the following recommendation. RECOMMENDATION(S): That the proposed timing for development of the affordable housing policy identified in the 2010 04 07 report on this subject be endorsed.. DISCUSSION a) Background Context: Requirement for an Affordable Housing Action Plan As noted above the 2010 business plan includes development of an updated affordable housing strategy (the last District affordable housing policy was adopted in 1991). Further, 4.3 the District will be required to submit a Housing Action Plan which is complimentary to the District's regional context statement within two years of the Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy (MVRGS) being adopted. Page 42 of the draft MVRGS is attached to this report and indicates the role the Municipalities are anticipated to play in meeting the intent of providing "diverse and affordable housing choices". Tables A.3 and A.4 in the MVRGS (also attached) define the projected demand for affordable housing. With that said until the MVRGS is actually adopted the defined role for municipalities and demand modeling cannot be confirmed and used as a basis for the District's Housing Action Plan. For context the content in the MVRGS on this subject is supported in and largely drawn from the Metro Vancouver Affordable Housing Strategy which has already been endorsed by Council and was approved in 2007. Planning Timetable The Social Planning business plan anticipated work on the affordable housing strategy would begin in November of this year. Since it is unlikely the MVRGS and the Municipality's subsequent work on its regional context statement will be completed by that time staff anticipate a slightly later start on the Maple Ridge Affordable Housing Strategy update than November, likely in the first quarter of 2011. Having discussed the planning process with consultants who have completed these projects elsewhere they project an eight month schedule for completion. It is hoped an earlier completion nearer to mid 2011 can be achieved given the work which has already be completed. The suggested timing has been framed anticipating the MVRGS will be adopted later this year. If for whjatever reason that does not occur Council may wish to proceed with the affordable housing strategy in advance of the MVRGS being adopted. Council can consider that once and if it becomes apparent adoption of the MVRGS will be delayed to any significant extent. Actions already taken in support of Affordable Housing In the mean time it is appropriate to acknowledge the substantial work that has already been completed in this subject area. Much of this will be incorporated into the Affordable Housing Strategy which is ultimately adopted by Council and submitted as our Affordable Housing Action Plan along with the District's Regional Context statement. For the time being our community is already benefitting from having implemented a variety of policies, bylaws and projects. The attached memorandum from the Manager of Community Planning, Christine Carter, outlines the work already completed with respect to affordable housing. She includes Council's adoption of the Official Community Plan Principles, Objectives and Policies on this subject. She also outlines a number of tools and bylaws currently utilized to support affordable, special needs and rental housing. In support of this notion that much has already been done Ms. Carter has also analyzed the recently adopted Coquitlam strategy and has determined it outlines many of the practices already being applied here in Maple Ridge. (A copy of the Coquitlam policy is available on request). Those identified as recommendations in the Coquitlam Strategy we are not using are listed in her memorandum as well and would likely be considered in a new Affordable Housing Action plan. b) Desired Outcome(s): The desired outcome is for a comprehensive affordable housing strategy which dovetails with the Regional Growth Strategy and the municipality's regional context statement. It is anticipated the strategy will support the development of affordable housing throughout the community and not only in one area of the community. c) Strategic Alignment: The OCP policies identified earlier speak to the requirement for an affordable housing strategy as does the Regional Growth Strategy. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: Enhanced availability of affordable housing will certainly have a positive impact on low income households. e) Business Plan/Financial Impacts: Research has identified the cost to complete other affordable housing strategies comparable to that contemplated here in Maple Ridge is in the range of $50,000. The Richmond and Chilliwack policies were developed with that level of funding. Since Maple Ridge already has a number of policies and practices in place it is anticipated that a budget of $50,000 should be adequate to complete the work. The current funding set aside for the affordable housing project in the 2010 budget is $75,000. Staff are proposing to reallocate $25,000 of this amount to an unrelated subject, the South Haney Neighbourhood Development initiative which is proposed in a separate report. CONCLUSIONS: Maple Ridge has already completed a significant amount of work related to affordable housing policies and initiatives. It is recognized more can and should be done. It is anticipated this further work will be defined through the development of a new affordable housing action plan following adoption of the Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy. In any case the Social Planning Advisory Committee recommends that the policy timetable include a start date early in 2011 with completion anticipated mid year in 2011. iy: Mike Murray General Monager: OoTmunity Development, Parks and Recreation Concurrence: Frank Quin Eng, MBA General Manager: Public Works and Development Services -o MAPLF R117GF British cotumhia To: Mike Murray, Sue Wheeler From: Christine Carter Subject: Affordable Housing Policies and practices Date: April 1, 2010 CC: Jane Pickering Interoffice Memorandum Further to our meeting earlier this week I have compiled some information pertaining to affordable, special needs and rental housing policies and practices in the District. I also was able to obtain a cost estimate for preparing an Affordable Housing Strategy and flagged items in the Coquitlam Strategy that we are currently not doing at this time. COST ESTIMATE: According to Dale McClanaghan of McClanaghan and Associates the Richmond Affordable Housing Strategy was $50,000 and the Chilliwack Strategy was $45,000. OCP PRINCIPLES, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES The Official Community Plan Principles were developed in 2006 through a Community Visioning Process and incorporated into the Official Community Plan. The most relevant principles related to affordable housing are: Principle 29 The community values a wide range of housing choices that provide variety and mix of housing type, density, lot size, character, tenure, and affordability. Principle 37 Housing choice is critical to meeting the diverse needs of current and future residents of Maple Ridge - special needs, singles, young families and an aging population. Principle 39 A healthy community depends on social services that meet the needs of a diverse population. OCP OBJECTIVES: To encourage a variety of housing types and densities to meet the diverse residential needs of the District. To accommodate future population growth and change through appropriate land use designations and strategies that are consistent with community and regional goals and objectives. To incorporate sufficient flexibility into Area Plans to allow for response to changing market and housing demands. To encourage the provision of affordable market and non -market housing and rental accommodation in Maple Ridge. To continue the secondary suite program within the District in order to encourage housing affordability for homeowners and renters. Where appropriate, to support the concept of garden suites on residential property in order to provide housing affordability for homeowners and renters, and rental accommodation in the community. To recognize that mixed socio-economic housing contributes positively to overall community health, and to facilitate the provision of special needs housing within the District (including social housing, community care facilities, transition housing, shelter housing and supportive housing units) for people with physical, mental, and/or lifestyle challenges. OCP POLICIES 3 -1 Maple Ridge will: a) designate an adequate supply of residential land to accommodate future residents; b) accommodate growth through infill by: i. promoting a mix of housing types and tenures to support diverse needs (e.g. income and abilities) lifestyles (e.g. age and values), and preferences. Examples include housing for older residents; housing for persons with disabilities; rental and ownership housing; new homeowners and empty nester housing; and ecologically sensitive design; and ii. developing other strategies as appropriate for meeting the future housing needs of residents. 3-5 Maple Ridge will support Healthy Community Land Use Strategies and community wellness nrinninlps bv a) recognizing the link between the provision of a range of housing options and social sustainability; b) promoting affordable housing developments that incorporate access to services through interconnecting roadways, bicycle paths, and pedestrian links; c) promoting activities that contribute to the needs, health, development, and well-being of individuals within the community, as well as the overall community; d) encouraging the provision of an appropriate scale of services at the neighbourhood level; e) promoting diverse, safe and secure neighbourhoods that facilitates neighbourly support, resulting in a healthier, more resilient community; f) encouraging public spaces that offer opportunities for community interaction; and g) promoting affordable housing developments that meet diverse housing needs. 3 - 29 Maple Ridge will regularly update its affordable housing strategy to identify specific targets, objectives, opportunities and municipal incentives for affordable, rental, and special needs housing. The affordable housing strategy will be initiated at the discretion of Council and in consultation with the Social Planning Advisory Committee. 3 - 30 Maple Ridge will encourage partnerships with government and non -government agencies to support the creation of affordable, rental and special needs housing in the community. 3 - 31 Maple Ridge recognizes that secondary suites and other detached dwelling units in residential neighbourhoods can provide affordable and/or rental housing in the community. Maple Ridge is committed to ensuring that bylaws and regulations are current, and responsive to community issues and needs. 3 - 32 Maple Ridge will undertake a further study to consider density bonussing as a means of encouraging the provision of affordable, rental and special needs housing, and amenities. 3 - 33 Maple Ridge supports the provision of rental accommodation and encourages the construction of rental units that vary in size and number of bedrooms. Maple Ridge may also limit the demolition or strata conversion of existing rental units, unless District -wide vacancy rates are within a healthy range as defined by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. 3 - 34 Maple Ridge supports the provision of affordable, rental and special needs housing throughout the District. Where appropriate, the provision of affordable, rental, and special needs housing will be a component of area plans. 3 - 35 Maple Ridge will encourage housing that incorporates "age -in -place" concepts and seniors housing designed to accommodate special needs. TOOLS MAPLE RIDGE UTILIZES TO SUPPORT AFFORDABLE, SPECIAL NEEDS, RENTAL HOUSING • Maple Ridge has a 1991 Affordable Housing Strategy. Many of the policies are embedded in the OCP • have a strata conversion policy and talk to anyone interested in converting rental stock to strata about this • permit small lot (R-3) development and duplex housing form • developed the Modular Home Part Redevelopment Tenant Assistance Policy 6.27 in 2008 • will be further exploring the rezoning of many of the manufactured home sites for further protection • encourage rental housing in exchange for a height variance • have legalized secondary suites • provide for temporary residential uses in most single family zones • recently adopted garden suites bylaw to provide for a detached dwelling unit in most singe family zones • provided municipal land for sale or lease for special needs housing • encourage developers to provide a variety of unit sizes and bedrooms when reviewing development proposals. • have incorporated affordable housing policies in Area Plans • have been involved with Strategic partnerships for homelessness, special needs housing and affordable housing • participate in regional housing initiatives and forums + ensure an adequate supply of residential lands are available in the community • the District advocates to senior government • assist the Social Planning Advisory Committee on housing related issues COMPARISON TO COQUITLAM'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGY For the most part, Maple Ridge is already doing many of the things identified in the Coquitlam strategy (see above). The following are items recommended for Coquitlam to consider, that the District of Maple Ridge is currently not doing: • land banking for affordable and special needs housing • establish an Affordable Housing Reserve Fund • require single family construction be built as "secondary suites" ready • adopt guidelines for adaptable housing • "upzone" appropriate sites for affordable housing • reduce DCC"s for affordable housing projects I hope this information is sufficient to assist in the drafting of your report. If you need anything else, please let me know. Christine Carter STRATEGY 4.1 Provide diverse and affordable housing choices Metro Vancouver's role is to: 4.1.1 Accept Regional Context Statements and Housing Action Plans that achieve diverse and affordable housing choices, and that meet the requirements set out in Action 4.1.4. 4.1.2 Implement the strategies and actions set out in the Metro Vancouver Affordable Housing Strategy, including increasing the portfolio of units managed by the Metro Vancouver Housing Corporation through exploring opportunities to optimize the use of existing sites, as well as through the management of units acquired through municipal processes. 4.1.3 Assist municipalities in developing Regional Context Statements and complementary Housing Action Plans by providing analysis on regional demographics, household characteristics and market conditions, and working with municipalities to review and refine municipal housing priorities and polices in the context of this analysis. The role of municipalities is to: 4.1.4 Develop Regional Context Statements and complementary Housing Action Plans which: a) identify local housing priorities that take into consideration changing demographics, household characteristics and housing needs; b) assess local market conditions including the affordability of existing ownership and rental housing options; c) include strategies which: work towards meeting the estimated future demand for rental and ownership units as set out in Table A.3 (Appendix A); ii) respond to the estimated future demand for housing units affordable to households with low and low to moderate incomes as set out in Table A.3 /Annanriiv A\• iii) increase the supply and diversity of the housing stock through infill developments and more compact housing forms; iv) as appropriate to local circumstances, use density bonus provisions, inclusionary housing policies or other mechanisms to increase the supply of affordable rental units for households with low or low to moderate incomes; v) as appropriate to local circumstances, limit the loss of existing rental housing stock as well as identify policies to mitigate the impact on tenants who may be displaced; vi) identify opportunities to work with other levels of government to secure additional social housing units to meet the needs of low income families, seniors and those with special housing needs, as well as to address the needs of those who are homeless and/or at risk of homelessness. Actions Requested of Other Governments and Agencies 4.1.5 That the federal and provincial governments and their agencies provide capital and operating funding to support the construction of a minimum of approximately 2,100 new social housing units per year over the ten years following the adoption of the Regional Growth Strategy, consistent with the estimates set out in Table A.3 (Appendix A) and the priorities identified by municipalities through their Housing Action Plans. 4.1.6 That the federal and provincial governments and their agencies provide capital and operating funding to support the construction of 6,100 new transitional and supportive housing units across the region over the ten years following the adoption of the Regional Growth Strategy to better meet the needs of those who are homeless and/or at risk of homelessness. TABLE A.3 Demand for Affordable Housing Including Social Housing (10 Year Estimate) LOW TO MODERATE LOW INCOMEMODERATE r ABOVE TOTAL SUBREGIONAL ESTIMATES DEMAND INCOME DEMAND INCOME DEMAND --DEMAND Burnaby, New Westminster 3,100 3,700 2,800 9,600 Langley City, Langley Township 1,700 2,000 1,400 5,100 Maple Ridge, Pitt Meadows 1,000 1,100 800 2,900 Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, I 2,700 3,200 R 2,300 8,200 Port Moody North Shore 1,000 1,000 700 2,700 Richmond, Delta, Tsawwassen 2,300 2,700 1,900 6,900 First Nation Surrey, White Rock 5,800 7,100 5,000 17,900 Vancouver, Electoral) Area A 3,800 T l 4,600 1 3,200 1 11,600 Notes: 1. It is. anticipated that at least 25% of future demand will be for housing that is affordable to households with low or low_ to moderate incomes. This translates into approximately 4,680 units per year or 46,800 units over 10 years. 2. Column 1 shows the estimated demand from low income households. These include households with annual incomes which fall below - 50% of the median income for the region and who typically require access to government -supported housing. To meet this demand, funding from other levels of government is required. 3. Column 2 shows the estimated demand from households with low to moderate incomes. These include households with annual incomes which fall between 50% and 80% of the median income for the region and could include households that require some level of housing assistance or access to affordable private market housing. 4. Column 3 shows the estimated demand for housing that is affordable to households with incomes which are above 80% of the median income for the region. These households typically have the resources needed to secure housing in the private market. While it is anticipated that many of these households will require rental housing, in some communities this demand could also be met through entry- level ownership opportunities. 5. Estimated housing demand by municipality is included in Table AA 64 DRAFT - NOVEMBER 2009 TABLE A.4 Housing Demand Estimates by Subregion and Municipality LOWTO MODERATE MODERATE AND ABOVE 10 YEAR OWNERSHIP RENTAL AFFORDABLE INCOME INCOME INCOME MUNICIPALLOW aTES ESTIMATE DEMAND DEMAND DEMADEMAND DEMAND DEMAND - �7,500 Burnaby 21,300 13,800 5,300 2,400 2,900 2,200 New Westminster 6,000 3,900 2,100 1,500 700 800 600 - ^.j{:- 'ins �( - �{, - y_�: ��r;r. �..;,. :-n.. : "5�':, ' •� �` 't �, _ .i'y `x. � sib=3:.�.��r` _ -.r{:. �•�='� -'� , �,: i..:_. ._- ��N- • •� - -d - - '�' p-�� ` _ �.:Y� _- r ..�- fi''� a�"gin t .,12- •=9.�kv_. ;� �.c��i�•. 600 300 . Langley City 2,300 1,500 800 300 200 Langley Township 12,200 7,900 4,300 3,100 _ 1,400 1 1,700 1,200 w Maple Ridge _ 6,600 2,300 1,700 800 900 4,300 i 600 Pitt Meadows 1,600 1,000 600 400 200 200 200 ! _ N -M Coquitlam 14,800 9,600 5,200 3,700 1,700 2,000 1,500 Port Coquitlam 4,600 3,000 1,600 1,200 500 700 400 Port Moody 4,100 2,700 1,400 1,000 500 500 400 IN- eta,." S'_` .4ti = �' - - _ - i4 s _ - 300 MIA~' 200 North Vancouver City 2,400 1,600 800 600 300 North Vancouver District 4,QD0 2,600 1,400 1,000 500 500 400 West Vancouver 1,400 900 500 400 200 200 100 2 r4� w y'-WIF-11 Delta___ 3,000 1,900 1,100 800 400 400 300 Richmond 16,000 10,400 5,600 4,000 1,800 2,200 1,600 Tsawwassen First Nation 700 500 200 200 100 100 - FJ Surrey 49,400 32,100 17,300 12,400 5,600 6,800 4,900 White Rock 1,800 1,200 600 500 200 300 100 ME Vancouver 30,700 20,000 10,700 7,700 3,500 4,200 3,000 Electoral Area A 2,700 1,800 900 - 700 300 400 200 Notes: 1. Anmore, Belcarra, and Lions Bay are not included in the table above given the modest levels of growth anticipated in these communities. 2. Bowen Island is not included in the table above as it does not fall under the jurisdiction of the Regional Growth Strategy. 3. The estimated demand for "affordable units" comprises demand from households with low and low to moderate incomes. CRAFT - NOVEMBER 2009 05 Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: 6411011I61111 District of Maple Ridge His worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council General Manager: Community Development, Parks and Recreation South Haney Neighbourhood Initiative 10:01111►VA:&INulu/_1:irs DATE: 2010 04 08 FILE NO: ATTN: Council Workshop Council has identified the Port Haney neighbourhood as an area which has experienced considerable stress over the past several years and have focused attention on that area from a regulatory and policing perspective. The Social Planning Advisory Committee considered this subject at its last meeting and wish to recommend the re allocation of $25,000 from the Affordable Housing Strategy budget to a South Haney Neighbourhood Initiative. The intent would be to provide seed money for Community Development supported by Social Planning which would focus on identifying and building on neighbourhood assets and growing capacity. The objective would be to support neighbourhood residents of all backgrounds to connect and determine how best to address the neighbourhood's challenges. Ultimately the goal is to assist residents in creating a healthier neighbourhood. RECOMMENDATION(S): That Council authorize reallocation of $25,000 from the affordable housing strategy budget to the neighbourhood development initiative in the South Haney area described in the 2010 04 07 report on this subject including involvement of all of the appropriate partner agencies involved in SPAC. DISCUSSION a) Background Context: We know that strong neighbourhoods are those where citizens who have a stake in their neighbourhood work closely together to address neighbourhood needs. Strong neighbourhoods are more successful in addressing whatever issues they face than those where citizens are isolated and do not work together. Since this is the case staff are proposing to redirect some of the affordable housing strategy funding (which does not appear to be required) to resource a neighbourhood development initiative in the South Haney area. The intent is to supplement other regulatory initiatives which have been undertaken over the past few years providing a more comprehensive response to a 4A neighbourhood in need. A brief project outline has been prepared by the Director of Community Services and is attached for Council consideration. Geographic boundaries for the neighbourhood will not be prescribed but rather will be determined by the residents themselves. The Social Planning Advisory Committee highlighted the need to engage citizens of all backgrounds in the initiative, reaching out to those who might be hesitant to become involved because of their personal circumstances. b) Desired Outcome(s): The desired outcome is a healthy South Haney neighbourhood which has taken full advantage of all its assets. c) Strategic Alignment: Neighbourhood development has been endorsed as an important approach to building a strong community in both the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Plan and the Official Community plan. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: Citizen engagement in a neighbourhood development initiative in South Haney should result in greater community pride and an increased capacity to address neighbourhood issues. e) Business Plan/Financial Impacts: Research has identified the cost to complete other affordable housing strategies comparable to that contemplated here in Maple Ridge is in the range of $50,000. The Richmond and Chilliwack policies were developed with that level of funding. Since Maple Ridge already has a number of policies and practices in place it is anticipated that a budget of $50,000 should be adequate to complete the work. The current funding set aside for the affordable housing project in the 2010 budget is $75,000. Staff are proposing to reallocate $25,000 of this amount to the South Haney Neighbourhood Development initiative which would commence as soon as a suitable Community Developer could be contracted. CONCLUSIONS: Staff are proposing an investment in the South Haney neighbourhood to ensure a full range of approaches is being applied to support creation of a healthier neighbourhood. Council's further direction in this initiative would be appreciated. i r� Pre4'6re by: Mike Murray ' General Manager: Community Development, Parks and Recreation i Concurrence J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Proposal for Community Development Approach to Support Neighbourhood Change (Neighbourhood South of North Street What the Research shows: Neighbourhoods Matter • Unhealthy Neighbourhoods effect an entire community in a negative way. • The effects of growing up in unhealthy neighbourhoods have significant life-long impacts on children. Healthy neighbourhoods are vital to the development of young children. • Neighbourhood change will only be effective if it is designed and lead by the Neighbourhood, therefore a community development (community capacity) approach is needed. The key is that this type of project takes a long term commitment and investment. Some Possible phases of roiect: • Research • Engage Community Partners • Neighbourhood Engagement Sessions • Study Circle (or whatever process) Facilitation (Visioning, Action Plans) • Developing Leaders, Learning from other Neighbourhoods • Supporting Action Plan initiatives Budget: Community Developer - 10hr per week for one year (10 hrs/wk X $30/hr X 50wks) _ $15,000 Neighbourhood Steering Committee Support/Coordination - $ 5,000 Supporting an Action Initiative = $ 5,000 Total _ $25,OQd BRITISH COLUM BIA II -le 13est Place on F=ffi j4t4 Z 9 2010 His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council District of Maple Ridge. 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Dear Mayor DmIkin and Councillors: Action: Ref: 13' 4 8 85) The Local Government Elections Task Force is Currently seeking written comments from your local government, and from organizations and individuals in your community, to assist in its review of local government election issues. Announced at the Union of British Columbia Municipalities (UBCM) 2009 Convention, the Local Government Elections Task Force is a Joint, consensus -based group of provincial and UBCM members. The Task Force co-chairs are Honourable Bill Bennett, Minister of Community and Rural Development. and Chair Harry Nyce, President of the UBCM. Otber Task Force members are: 0 Surrey Councilloir, Barbara Steele, first vice-president, UBCM; 0 Quesnel Mayor. Mary Sjostrom, third vice-president, UBCM_; 0 Donna Barnett, MLA, Cariboo—Chilcotin; and 0 Douglas Horne, MI.A, Coquitlam—Burke Mountain. Recognizing the importance of hearing from local governments throu'C"'hout British Columbia, fffie Task Force invites you to submit the comments of your local government on any or at I of the following topics: • Campaign finance, including contribution/spending, disclosure and limits, and tax credits; • Enforcement processes and outcomes;. • Role of the British Columbia Chief Electoral Officer in local government elections; Ministry of Community and Rural Development Office of the Minister .WL. 94 wncn2, I". QW of PO Box 9056 Stn Prov Gout Victoria BC V8W 9E2 Phone: 250 387-2283 Fax: 250 387-4312 wvAv.qov.bc.ca)cd 5 Mayor Daykin and Councillors 1 2 Election cycle (term, of office); Corporate vote; and, Matters raised in election resolutions submilUcCi to lbe 2009 I-1BCN4 Convention, suciri as the eligibility of volunteers. To assist in its deliberations, the Task Force would appreciate your comnients as soon as possible, preferably by April 15, 2010. It is anticipated that the Task Force will deliver its reco.-mnendations to the Province of British Columbia and the UBCM by May 30, 2010, afler which legislation is expected to be presented to the Legislature in time for the 2011 local government elections. The Task Force is aware of the tight time frame and that the interest in local government elections extends beyond local governments to the broader community including individuals, community groups and other representative organizations, As such, the Task Force requests that you share this request for written comments within your community, particularly with local groups and individuals interested In local government election issues. Written comments can be made via email to: Loca'iElectionsTaskForceti�l.bc.ca, by fax to: 250 3 87-7972, or by mail to: Local Government Elections Task Force c-,/'o Ministry of Community and Rural Development PO Box 9839 Stn Prov Govt Victoria, BC V8W 9TI Though the Task Force will receive feedback primarily through written comments, individual Task Force members will also engage in conversations on the election issues under review as they meet with local government representatives, organizations and citizens during the normal course of their responsibilities. For local governments, the UBCM is planning a one -day workshop in March for its members who wish to attend. In addition, Area Associations will have a Ruther opportunity to discuss these issues at their Spring Conventions. Workshop details will be announced shortly. For Rather information on the Local Govermnent Elections Task Force, please visit the website at: www."cuiEje(;titins-laskForce.go-v.bc-ca. Mayor DaYkin and CounClflh-)rs Page 3 We look forward to hearing tiurn yoii on. ways to i-IIVYOVe OUT jcli:all processes. Sincerely, 14 Bill Bennett Harty Nyce Minister of Community President and Rural Development Union of British Columbia Municipalities Legislative Office East Annex, Parliament Buildings Victoria, B.C. V8V 1X4 Phone: 250 953-4869 Fax: 250 387-9091 Constituency Office 8312 — 74th Avenue P.O. Box 1110 Osoyoos, B.C. VOH 1VO Phone: 250 495-2042 Toll -Free: 1 877 652-4304 Fax: 250 495-2077 e-mail: john.slater.mla@leg.bc.ca website: www.johnslatermla.bc.ca February 24, 2010 Province of British Columbia Legislative Assembly Dear Mayors, Councillors and Regional District Chairs: John Slater, M.L.A. Boundary Similkameen Parliamentary Secretary for Water Supply and Allocation In my letter to you dated December 17, 2009 I informed you that the provincial government is planning to modernize the Water Act, a key commitment in Living Water Smart: British Columbia's Water Plan. To help address this challenge, the Province launched the Living Water Smart blog to encourage water stewardship, share ideas and support dialogue on modernizing the Water Act. To further stimulate discussion and encourage participation, I am pleased to provide you with the enclosed Water Act Modernization Discussion Paper. The discussion paper proposes principles, goals and objectives to guide the process of modernizing the Water Act. The document also presents possible solutions and options to help realize the proposed goals and objectives. The proposed solutions are a starting point for consideration and discussion and are intended to assist you in preparing a submission of suggestions or ideas for a modernized Water Act. The discussion paper will also help frame the upcoming series of Water Act modernization regional multi -stakeholder workshops that were recently announced. Further information on modernizing the Water Act, the discussion paper and regional workshops is available from the Living Water Smart website at: www.livingwatersmart.ca. I also encourage you to visit the blog at: http:Hblo-g.gov.bc.ca/livingwatersmart. I invite your feedback on all sections of the discussion paper and encourage your participation at the upcoming workshops. Your input will play an integral part of informing a modernized Water Act. 5.2 Sincerely, John Slater, MLA- Boundary- S imilkameen Parliamentary Secretary for Water Supply and Allocation Enclosure: British Columbia's Water Act Modernization Discussion Paper cc: Honourable Bill Bennett, Minister of Community and Rural Development Gary MacIsaac, Executive Director, Union of British Columbia Municipalities a lvj I Ile, mr r 0 hl -2 How to use this paper The purpose of the paper is to stimulate discussion on modernizing the Water Act and help you: 1. Understand the opportunity that modernizing the Water Act represents; 2. Consider the way water is managed in BC and how it can be strengthened; and 3. Prepare your submission of suggestions for a modernized Water Act. Principles The proposed principles have underpinned the development of this discussion paper and, once they are finalized after public input, will guide the policy development process. Goals The four goals shape the scope and vision of the WaterAct modernization. Under each goal the current management context is discussed and the opportunities to improve the WaterAct are identified. Objectives Objectives help a nswer "wh at" we hope to achieve under each goal using the WaterAct. Objectives appear on a blue background. Possible solutions The possible solutions present a range of specific options that the WaterAct could include. They help answer"how"we could achieve the goals and objectives through regulatory change. The options, marked by a water drop, are a starting point for consideration and discussion. In many instances the ` possible solutions can help achieve multiple objectives. Part One: WaterAct modernization introduction outlines the process and scope of Water Act modernization (WAM) and provides information on future water challenges. Part Two: Proposals for change proposes principles to underpin a modernized Water Act as well as the four goals. Under each goal are objectives and possible solutions. Part Two presents a range of opportunities for using, sustaining and managing water resources in a changing environment. This paper does not present any preferred option or position. Part Three: Getting involved explains how to learn more and how to make a submission. Government welcomes feedback on all sections. Questions within each section may guide the preparation of your submission. Submissions are invited until April 30, 2010. This document can be read electronically and has live hyperlinks to additional information. Section 10 contains resources cited throughout this document, and a glossary of terms. Additional information on WAM is provided through the Living Water Smart (LWS) website and in an accompanying Water Act Modernization Technical Background Report. LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ w Contents PART ONE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION INTRODUCTION 1 The Water Act modernization process 2 The scope of the Water Act modernization 3 Why consider changing the Water Act? PARTTWO PROPOSALS FOR CHANGE 4 Principles 5 GOAL ONE Protect stream health and aquatic environments 5.1 Objectives for protecting stream health and aquatic environments 5.2 Possible solutions 6 GOAL TWO Improve water governance arrangements 6.1 Objectives for improving water governance 6.2 Possible solutions 7 GOAL THREE Introduce more flexibility and efficiency in the water allocation system 7.1 Objectives for introducing more flexibility and efficiency in the water allocation system 7.2 Possible Solutions 8 GOAL FOUR Regulate groundwater extraction and use 8.1 Objective for regulating groundwater extraction and use 8.2 Possible solutions PARTTHREE GETTING INVOLVED 9 Participating in the Water Act modernization process 9.1 Online information and engagement 9.2 Making a formal submission 9.3 Submission guide 10 Resources 10.1 Glossary and acronyms 10.2 Environmental laws protecting stream health in British Columbia 10.3 Groundwater wells and proposed thresholds 10.4 Comparison of possible water governance solutions 10.4 Characteristics of a water governace framework 10.6 Map of existing water district and Regional District Boundaries 10.7 Water Act modernization possible solutions at a glance LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ 2 2 3 5 6 8 8 13 13 15 20 21 22 29 30 30 33 33 34 35 36 38 ..V 40 41 42 43 ti• �� � 44 1 I PART ONE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION INTRODUCTION PART O N E Water Act modernization introduction Wilsey Dam Bert Brazier The Water Act is the primary law in BC for managing our water resources and has a key role in ensuring the sustainability of BC's water resources. Under the Water Act government makes decisions on licences to: divert and use water in streams (water allocation); construct works or make other changes in and about a stream; and any change or transfer to water licences. Water management planning, water allocation planning and drought management are also included in the Water Act. To respond to new challenges that exist for managing our water, including dealing with population growth and climate change, the government is looking at ways to modernize the Water Act. The word stream is often used in this document and has a broad definition under the Water Act. It includes a natural watercourse or source of supply, whether usually containing water or not, and a lake, river, creek, spring, ravine, swamp and gulch. A watershed is the region or area of land that drains into a stream, river system, or other body of water. Watersheds are divided by mountains or hill ridges. Watersheds can be considered at different scales from a basin scale (made up of many smaller watersheds that drain into a large river) to a small scale watershed with drainage to one stream or lake. Water under the ground —groundwater —is stored in an aquifer which is is an un- derground deposit of permeable materials (usually sand or gravel), where water is stored. Aquifers can be interconnected to other aquifers and surface water bodies and can occur at various depths. Everybody lives and works in a watershed. In BC watersheds and aquifers are used for multiple purposes which may include farming and industrial activities as well as for drinking water and recreation. LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ PART ONE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION INTRODUCTION transfer prohibitions in the Water Protection Act. Amendments to other laws may be made so they are consistent with the Water Act. Where appropriate, a modernized Water Act could improve alignment with overlapping elements of federal legislation such as the Fisheries Act and the Species at Risk Act. 3 Why consider changing the Water Act? Water law in British Columbia has evolved over more than 100 years although most of the principles were established in or before the first Water Act of 1909. BC's Water Act is one of the province's oldest provincial statutes. It reflects the issues and practices of a time when BC's population was less than 500,000, water was considered plentiful, and industrial and agricultural de- velopments were only emerging. Societal expectations and values have, and will continue to change. British Columbians care about keeping our water resources healthy and sustainable and have a strong desire to maintain salmon and other fish stocks and their habitat. Our understanding of the effects of human activities on wa- tershed health has also increased significantly. The challenges in the 21st century are very different to those of the last century. Over the next 25 years the population of BC is expected to increase by 1.4 million people and our climate is changing. Population growth means increased demands on our water resource for drinking, for irrigation, for power generation and increased effects on the water from land -based activities such as urbanization, forestry and other re- source extraction activities. The implications of climate change for BC's water are sig- nificant. They include changes in rainfall and snowfall, increasing magnitude of storm events and altered timing and magnitude of peak flows and low flows.' Stream and lake temperatures are also predicted to rise, which is of vital importance to salmon which are sensitive to high water temperatures during their migration up river to spawn.' Drought conditions and low stream flows in summer will be more common and may increase conflicts among water users and between water users and the environment. These issues will put additional pressure on watersheds and mean future stream flow patterns may not reflect past patterns. In the past there have been few incentives to improve water efficiency and conservation in the province and British Columbians are among the largest consumers of water in the world. Currently, about 5000 water sources in BC have identified water shortages or restrictions, which can limit future surface water withdrawals, cause conflicts during 1 Information on the hydrological impact of climate change in BC can be found on www.livingwatersmart.ca. 2 Environmental Trends in BC, Ministry of Environment 2007. LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ Elk River Trail in Strathcona Park Ted White PARTTWO PROPOSALS FOR CHANGE PART TWO Proposals for change Yoho Cascade Kevin Ronneseth 4 Principles WAM is an opportunity to ensure the principles underlying the Water Act respond to modern expectations, as well as promote stream health and water security. These principles have underpinned the development of this discussion paper and, once finalized through engagement, will help to guide the policy development process. Your views are welcome on the following proposed principles: 1. BC's water resources are used within sustainable limits. 2. First Nations social and cultural practices associated with water are respected and accommodated. 3. Science informs water resource management and decision making. 4. Water resource legislation, policy and decision making processes as well as management tools are integrated across all levels of government. 5. Rules and standards for water management are clearly defined, providing a predictable investment climate across the province. 6. Flexibility is provided to adapt to extreme conditions or unexpected events on a provincial, regional or issue -specific level. 7. Incentives are created for water conservation that consider the needs of users and investors. 8. Rights to use water come with responsibilities to be efficient and help protect stream health. LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ GOAL ONE PROTECT STREAM HEALTH AND AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS Vancouver Island and have improved the efficiency of making water allocation deci- sions and they protect environmental flows. Developing a plan makes this information readily available for water licence applicants and other stakeholders. Water allocation plans also assist government agencies and water licence applicants in coordinating with other environmental laws. The Water Act protects stream habitat by regulating the changes that may be made in and about a stream. The Ministry of Environment allows low risk activities to occur under certain guidelines and requires detailed review and approval of higher risk activities. The Water Act provisions for changes in and about a stream are applied in areas where the Forest and Range Practices Act and the Riparian Areas Regulation do not apply. Although the Water Act provisions are effective, there are opportunities to improve coordination with other legislation. The protection of water quality could be improved by strengthening provisions in the Water Act regarding the dumping of certain substances into streams. The Water Act can restrict the dumping of material into streams using an engineer's order. This provision is reactive, and can be improved by clearly making the dumping of a wider range of materials into a stream an offence, and requiring appropriate restoration. In addition to improving stream health protection, this would improve protection of fish habitat and support the federal Fisheries Act. Water Management Plans and Water Quality Objectives are two additional tools that may be used to address risks to water quality. Water Management Plans, enabled by Part 4 of the Water Act are implemented by regulations that can influence decisions made under other provincial laws. However, the usefulness of this tool for coordinating with other laws and for improving water quality has not been tested. Water Quality Objectives, which are developed for a specific water body, provide another way to protect stream health. The requirement to consider Water Quality Objectives could be included under a modernized Water Act as well as decisions made under other environmental laws. Reviewing the Water Act provides an opportunity to improve stream health protection and the alignment and coordination with other provincial, federal and local laws. Any changes made to protect stream health may have implications on water governance and the flexibility and efficiency in water allocation. LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ LA GOAL ONE PROTECT STREAM HEALTH AND AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS This dual approach is already successfully used on Vancouver Island in its water allocation policies, and is incorporated into the provincial interim instream flow thresholds.' These interim instream flow thresholds were developed primarily for use in the review of applications for water power projects. In future, a standard setting method will be used for low risk withdrawals, such as domestic water and small irrigation, and detailed assessment methods for high risk applications, such as waterworks or water power. The environmental flow methods used in BC are ,,rree explored in the Water Act Modernization Technical Background Report. Options for how environmental flow is to be considered in decisions Aside from being included in water licence conditions known as `fish clauses; the protection of environmental flows may also occur via a stream flow protection licence, or through a water reserve. Two options are proposed for requiring the decision maker to consider environmental flows when making new water allocation decisions. The decision makers under the Water Act for water licences are the Comptroller of Water Rights and the Regional Water Manager. A. Environmental Flow Guidelines ■ In this option the environmental flow recommendations are guidelines, from which the decision maker may deviate in certain circumstances. Clear justification must be provided for any deviation and applicants could appeal decisions. OR B. Environmental Flow Standards ■ In this option the environmental flow recommendations become standards that the decision maker must adhere to with no exceptions. The distinction between the options is the degreee of discretion provided to the decision maker when reviewing a water licence application. The guidelines option allows the decision maker to consider environmental flows on a case -by -case basis and use conditions in a licence to avoid or minimize potential impacts on stream health. Under the guidelines option if an applicant feels the environmental flow recommenda- tion is too conservative, the applicant may be able to scientifically demonstrate that their application will not impact stream health. The standards option has more certainty but is less flexible, meaning that there may be greater emphasis placed on the determination of environmental flows. The standards option would need more time and resources to determine as they would be legally en- forceable. This may result in longer licence processing times and have increased costs for new licence applicants. The standards option may be viewed as providing greater protection to stream health; however, because of their inflexibility, they could lead to more permissive recommendations. The two options have different implications for flexibility and efficiency in the administration of the Water Act, and water governance arrangements. 5 Development of instream flow thresholds as guidelines for reviewing proposed water uses. Hatfield, et al. 2003. LEARN MORE ABOUTTHE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION ATwww.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ GOAL ONE PROTECT STREAM HEALTH AND AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS Options for including water allocation plans in the Water Act Consideration must be given as to whether the development of water allocation plans could be optional or required, and determining the level of discretion decision makers have for the resulting plan's application. A. The development of water allocation plans is optional e Developed at the discretion of the Regional Water Manager and could be based on increasing water demand and decreasing water supplies, changing environmental conditions, conflicts among users, or at the request of a water user community. OR B. The development of water allocation plans is required ■ Plans may be developed province -wide, or • Criteria to determine priority areas may be developed, with priority areas requiring a plan, or n Plans may be ordered by the Comptroller of Water Rights. AND C. The decision maker must consider the water allocation plan ■ Once adopted, decision makers must consider plans. Although the decision maker is not bound by the plan they would be required to explain reasons for any decisions that do not follow the plan's recommendations. OR D. The decision maker must follow the water allocation plan w Once adopted, the plan must be followed with no exceptions by the decision maker. Which options do you prefer, and why? Are there others? Under what conditions should a water allocation plan be developed and how should it be applied? LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ 11 6 GOAL TWO I m prove water governance arrangements Water governance is a broad and complex concept that includes the laws and regulations, the agencies and institutions that are responsible for decision making, and the policies and procedures that are used to make decisions and manage water resources. Governance also includes the way that science, information, community and traditional knowledge inform laws, policies and decisions. Put simply, a water governance framework includes three dimensions made up of a number of elements described below. See Resource 10.5 for a fuller discussion and examples. ■ Laws, rules, agreements and financing arrangements e.g. federal and provincial legislation, policies, processes, budgets, boundary and inter -jurisdictional agreements; ■ Institutions, systems, roles and responsibilities e.g. agencies, information bases and the determination of who does what and how; and ■ Operational management functions e.g. planning, issues response, decisions, enforcement, and outreach. British Columbians are interested in water and are acting to protect and sustain it. Working together, government, industry, academia, non -government agencies and communities are learning how to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change and rapid population growth. Conversations on water governance have shown signifi- cant interest in exploring the roles and responsibilities for input into water related planning and decision making for water. At the same time, governments at all levels are looking for ways to streamline their administrative role and reduce their resource needs. Creative solutions are being sought for funding and for effectively and fairly distributing the various roles and responsibilities for managing water as a natural resource as efficiently and effectively as possible. Canadas Constitution sets out the roles of the provincial and federal government with respect to water management and stewardship. Water governance in BC is primarily set out in the Water Act which, together with the Water Protection Act, determines that water resources are owned by the Crown. Crown ownership will not be revisited under WAM and water will continue to be managed in the public trust for current and future generations. Under the Water Act, provincial decision makers license and regulate only the use of surface water from streams as well as authorize and regulate changes in and about streams. Changes in and about streams include any modifications that result in changes to the natural flow of water. LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ III •J GOAL TWO IMPROVE WATER GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS at the local level applying local expertise. Setting environmental standards and environmental objectives should be consistent throughout the province. However, taking actions to meet the standards and objectives at the local level would benefit from knowledge of the local context. Making changes to water governance is complex and any proposals will need to consider the time and resources needed for any transition. Modernizing the Water Act provides an opportunity to investigate governance arrangements, including new or existing institutions, roles and responsibilities for water management decisions. Through the Water Governance Project, British Columbians have been investigating watershed -based governance and discussing potential models. In 2008 a number of workshops were held across the province with participation from a broad representa- tion of people living, working and investing in watersheds. Water governance consider- ations and possible approaches presented in this section are informed by these discussions and two reports: Delegating Water Governance: Issues and Challenges in the BC Context by Nowlan and Bakker 2007; and Setting a New Course in British Columbia — Water Governance Reform Options and Opportunities by Brandes and Curran 2009. 6.1 Objectives for improving water governance In order to improve.BC's water governance arrangements the.following objectives are proposed for a modernized Water Act: 1. Governance roles and accountabilities. are clarified in relation to the allocation of water and the protection of stream health This includes roles for First Nations, industry, local communities and non -government organizations in planning and decision. making 2..Governance arrangements are flexible and responsive to future needs and values 3. Management is coordinated with neighbouring jurisdictions across all levels of government and those with a major interest in the watershed Indicate your level of support for the objectives proposed. (� STRONGLY ❑ SUPPORT F—I NEUTRA.L SUPPORT DISAGREE F-I S i RONGLY DISAGREE The Water Governance Project was a partnership between the BC Ministry of Environment, the Fraser Basin Council, Georgia Basin -Vancouver Island Living Rivers, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ 15 GOALTWO IMPROVE WATER GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS 6 Options for improving water governance A. Centralized approach The provincial government would continue to make most water management decisions in the centralized approach. There would be improvements to the current arrangements through resource management coordination and unified processes for environmental assessment and permitting. Governance arrangements would not change significantly. Streamlined processes and computerized decision - support tools can provide data standards, simplify and add transparency to decision making processes. Provincial government officials would continue to develop coor- dinated business plans, communications, training and integrated service delivery. For example, government will facilitate a single consultation process for First Na- tions on applications that require permits from multiple agencies. This would help speed up government approvals and decision making times (especially for low risk transactions), reduce the consultation burden on First Nations, and ensure govern- ment remains accountable for the protection of environmental flow needs and stream health. The modernized Water Act could require water allocation planning and the consid- eration of stream health in decisions. Advice and participation from First Nations and other stakeholders in the watershed could be sought during the water allocation planning process. Increased provincial engagement in local government planning processes for land use could also improve the integration of water considerations into planning at the local level. The role of licence holders may also change under this approach to motivate compliance and help prioritize enforcement activities. As appropriate, water users would be responsible to report actual water use and declare compliance with water licence conditions. B. Shared approach The shared approach delegates specific water management functions and decisions to a First Nation or partner institution such as an existing Regional District, depending on their capacity or willingness to undertake responsibilities. Any delegated decision making would rest with representatives who are locally elected or appointed by government. The shared approach could improve local visioning and shared decision making for water, and could rely on existing institutions and plan- ning arrangements for its implementation. If the management of water occurred on a watershed basis, then agreements to work collaboratively with other jurisdictions sharing the watershed would form part of the approach (see Resource 10.6 for a map of Regional District Boundaries). Partner institutions could lead regional visioning and planning processes for watershed planning, and extend current public education and outreach activities. Land use plans, Regional Growth Strategies, Official Community Plans and water- shed management plans could be used to articulate water management values and LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ 17 GOAL TWO IMPROVE WATER GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS with other jurisdictions and organizations on common issues, such as land use planning and development activities would form part of the chosen approach. Which approach do your prefer, and why? Are there others? What scale of watershed is most appropriate for water planning and management (see Resource 10.6)? What funding solutions might help to implement the approaches? What are the important considerations for accountability, transparency, and dispute resolution processes in any delegated or shared approach? What are the benefits and implications of sharing roles for water stewardship? LEARN MORE ABOUTTHE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ 19 GOAL THREE INTRODUCE MORE FLEXIBILITY AND EFFICIENCY IN THE WATER ALLOCATION SYSTEM and sustain stream health. Consistency helps applicants and planners understand the expectations for water use and the amount of water available. Flexibility is also needed to improve the ability of users and businesses to adapt to changing climate and economies, water supplies, and public expectations. In future, allocation decisions and water licence conditions should allow for responsiveness to watershed needs or unexpected conditions, encourage the use of up-to-date technology and help focus water management efforts in priority areas. There are three key ways in which the Water Act could be updated to address current water allocation challenges. One is by improving the ability to review licence terms and conditions so they can be adjusted in response to new conditions. The second is to require decision makers to consider the actual and potential impacts on the watershed as a whole when making decisions under the Water Act. The third is to encourage water users to maximize the use of their water and encourage the uptake of efficient tools, practices and infrastructure. 7.1 Objectives for introducing more flexibility and efficiency in the water allocation system In order to introduce more flexibility and efficiency in the water. allocation system the following objectives are proposed for a modernized Water Act:. 1. The water allocation system emphasizes and encourages.efficie.ncies in both water use and the administration of water as.a natural resource .2. Water users amd decision makers have flexibility to quickly adapt to changing environmental, economic and social conditions 3. The water allocation system integrates the management of groundwater and surface water resources where required in problem areas 4. Water users conserve water during drought or when stream health is threatened Indicate your level of support for the objectives proposed. STRONGLY SUPPORT ❑ NEUTRAL SUPPORT 7.2 Possible Solutions DISAGREE STRONGLY DISAGREE All of the options below relate to the allocation of water (where it is, or will be, regulated). For more on groundwater extraction and use see Goal Four. The LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ GOALTHREE INTRODUCE MORE FLEXIBILITY AND EFFICIENCY IN THE WATER ALLOCATION SYSTEM This includes improving the ability for users to transfer from one appurtenance to another, and for the extension of rights to other purposes. These measures may provide flexibility for users to transfer water from `lower value' uses to `higher value' uses for both short term and long term transfers of existing allocations within water- sheds. Transfers could be enabled for both consumptive uses and stream health pro- tection purposes. To implement this proposal government would provide guidance and audit transfers to ensure there are no increased impacts on the environment or other users. Which options do you prefer, and why? Are there others? The administration of water refers to the time and resources required to plan, make decisions, and to regulate water activities. Low -risk amendments to licences and appli- cations for new licenses (for example, some licence apportionments and most licence applications for domestic use) normally have little impact on the watershed but are process intensive and slow down decision making. These applications are a major part of government workload and are generally approved unless the stream is fully allocated or other conflicts exist. Applicants, water users, and all levels of government would benefit from a simplified and streamlined allocation and transfer process for low -risk applications, some apportionments and transfers. It is for this reason WAM would consider whether some uses of water could be simply allowed to occur, rather than to licence them in accordance with particular require- ments. These uses, which could be called a `permitted use', could include reasonable domestic uses, stock watering, short-term uses below a threshold, and other small or low risk uses. Permitted uses could be applied to groundwater and surface water. This would then allow efforts and resources to be focused on higher risk decisions and activities in areas of water stress. Permitted uses could also apply to existing users for domestic purposes without a right (groundwater or unrecorded surface water). Existing licensed users could be encouraged to transition their right to divert and use water to a permitted use, under specific circumstances. Consideration would have to be given to the status of the permitted use in terms of priority, whether based on purpose or dates, or whether such status protection would only be available for licences. To ensure sustainable levels of with- drawals from the resource, self -registration and reporting of the permitted use might be necessary. Any registration and reporting could be streamlined through an online system and would not necessarily require a decision. LEARN MORE ABOUTTHE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwateTsmart.ca/water-act/ 23 GOALTHREE INTRODUCE MORE FLEXIBILITY AND EFFICIENCY IN THE WATER ALLOCATION SYSTEM Options to encourage administrative and water use efficiencies To improve decision making times and enforcement, existing water licence holders and applicants may potentially be responsible for: I. Providing more detailed information about the proposed use and efficiency measures for licence applications or changes; J. Documenting potential environmental impacts and effects on other users in licence applications or changes; K. Seeking consent from, or undertaking consultation with, affected parties for licence applications or changes; L. Measuring and reporting actual water use when demonstrating compliance with licence conditions; M. Reporting well levels for regulated groundwater users; N. Self -registering wells, especially where groundwater is in direct hydraulic connection with surface water or in areas of known quantity concern; or O. ANY combination of the above. Which options do you prefer, and why? Are there others? OBJECTIVE TWO Flexibility is provided to water users and decision makers to quickly adapt to changing environmental, economic and social conditions. The water resource needs to be more closely managed where there are pressures on the environment caused by a lack of water, or conflicts between users, or changing condi- tions in a watershed. The ability to review or revisit licence terms and conditions would be useful where information shows that this is warranted due to changing conditions. Consistent criteria to determine the areas of high priority or increased pressure on water resources would assist the transparency of any reviews undertaken. These re- views could occur on a watershed or aquifer basis rather than on a licence -by -licence basis as is currently allowed. Collaboration between government agencies and licence holders on these reviews could also reduce the consultation burden, processing time and costs. Addressing these issues through collaboration would promote community understanding and result in robust adaption outcomes. LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ 25 GOALTHREE INTRODUCE MORE FLEXIBILITY AND EFFICIENCY IN THE WATER ALLOCATION SYSTEM If water licences have the same priority date on the same stream, the Water Act currently sets the following precedence (ordered highest to lowest): domestic, waterworks, mineral trading, irrigation, mining, industrial, power, hydraulicking, storage, conservation, conveying and land improvement purposes. Many jurisdictions have modified their FITFIR arrangements (during times of low flow). Manitoba, for example, gives priority to domestic then municipal, agricultural, industrial, irrigation, and other uses. Which option do you prefer, and why? Are there others? OBJECTIVE FOUR Water users will be required to conserve water during drought or when stream health is threatened. Sometimes there is not enough water to satisfy the total demand of all users and the needs of the environment. When these water shortages occur, tough decisions have to be made including under which circumstances, and how water should be shared. Transparent, simple and fair processes are required to address both temporary and long term scarcity. The options to address water scarcity are most effective when inte- grated with measuring and reporting of actual use, and an effective communication and response plan such as a drought management plan. Any groundwater user may also be required to conserve water in times of drought or where stream health r. is threatened. Options to address temporary water scarcity A. Discretional ■ The decision -maker determines the approach on a case -by -case basis, balancing the effects on water users with the required environmental outcome (similar to section 9 of the Fish Protection Act). B. Sharing ■ All water users would reduce use on a proportional basis depending on the water supply forecast, for example, if the supply forecast shows less water than normal, then allocations would be reduced on a pro rata basis. This approach could be influenced by water use efficiency, creating an incentive to employ efficient practices. C. Hierarchy of uses ■ A hierarchy of uses guides how water use is reduced, for example, human and stock watering needs would be satisfied before landscape irrigation. LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ 27 s GOAL FOUR Regulate Groundwater Extraction and Use BC's groundwater characteristics are unique. Many of our most productive sand and gravel aquifers are small and shallow. These aquifers are often adjacent to, and are in direct connection with rivers and streams. Aside from the important economic benefits gained from using groundwater, it is also important to the habitat of fish and aquatic species as it provides a stable flow of cool and clean water. This is particularly important when stream flows are low and at certain times in the fish rearing cycle. In such cases, the ability to manage surface water and groundwater together is important. This section considers how to improve the regulation of groundwater extraction and use through a modernized Water Act. Regulation may mean placing terms and condi- tions on groundwater extraction and use through a licensing or permitting process. Changes would aim to provide clarity on the extraction and use of groundwater for the million people in BC who depend on it for drinking water, and an improved investment climate for the businesses that rely on it. Feedback is welcome on the kind of regulation or controls that should be applied to groundwater extraction and use. Groundwater extraction and use in BC is not regulated and government's ability to control its use is limited. As a result, all levels of government and citizens are chal- lenged to find methods that can manage conflicts among water users and deal with reductions in groundwater quantity or quality concerns. This situation was partially addressed by the Drinking Water Protection Act and Water Act amendments in 2001 and the Groundwater Protection Regulation (GWPR) in 2004. In addition, certain large scale groundwater extractions (greater than 75 litres per second) are subject to an environmental assessment to secure a certificate under the Environmental Assessment Act. Other legislation or regulations affecting groundwater include the federal Fisheries Act and BC's Environmental Management Act, Oil and Gas Activities Act, Environmental Assessment Act, Water Protection Act and regulations applicable to water utilities. Phase Two of the Ground Water Protection Regulation (GWPR), which is under development, addresses the management of groundwater by minimizing conflicts between well owners and protecting stream health. It includes provisions for siting new wells and controlling artesian flows from wells. In addition, Phase Two will provide protection to wells and aquifers by requiring additional construction and pump installation measures. Phase Two also proposes the mandatory submission of well drilling reports. Well construction and maintenance activities will continue to be regulated under the GWPR or oil and gas legislation. Regulating the extraction and use of groundwater can provide the necessary controls to resolve conflicts over well drilling activities and the impacts of groundwater use. In some areas of the province, wells are being drilled without consideration of the well's location or its impact on streams or other users. As a result, conflicts are increasing LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ Welands in early spring Kevin Ronneseth GOAL FOUR REGULATE GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION AND USE OBJECTIVE ONE Groundwater extraction and use is regulated in priority (critical) areas and for all large withdrawals. It is proposed to regulate extraction and use of groundwater above the applicable thresholds for large withdrawals, or within priority areas for all new and existing wells. The overall objective is resource protection. The possible solution includes the regulation of the extraction and use of fresh water for all purposes, including the injection of groundwater for oil and gas production. The construction of water source wells associated with oil and gas activities will continue to be regulated under oil and gas legislation. The possible solution contemplates that if licensing of groundwater or other forms of regulation are considered necessary, existing groundwater users would be provided with transitional time to apply for their existing extraction and use to obtain protection similar to a water licence. Incentives for applying might include: • increased security of the existing use; s protection of the use from impacts (e.g., regulation of new well drilling on adjacent property); and ■ an application deadline after which increased requirements to prove historic water extraction and use could apply. Options for determining the thresholds for large groundwater withdrawals How much A. The threshold for large could be: water is that? ® 500 m3/day for wells drilled in unconsolidated, sand and gravel aquifers or if 500 m3/day would supply otherwise determined to be large by a Water Management Plan. 200-250 single residential * 100 m3/day for wells drilled into consolidated bedrock aquifers or if otherwise de- homes or 0.4 acre/foot termined to be large by a Water Management Plan. of water per day. OR 250 m3/day would supply 100-120 single B. The threshold for large could be: residential homes ■ 250 m3/day for wells drilled in unconsolidated, sand and gravel aquifers or if or 0.2 acre/foot otherwise determined to be large by a Water Management Plan. of water per day. ■ 100 m3/day for wells drilled into consolidated bedrock aquifers or if otherwise de- termined by a Water Management Plan. The 500 m3/day threshold would capture mid to large sized water supply systems for small towns and larger communities, larger farms, resorts and golf courses. The 250 m3/day threshold would provide greater extraction control and would capture all of the above as well as some smaller enterprises. There would be a corresponding in- crease in regulatory costs. The proposed thresholds are the highest in Canada due to the relative abundance of groundwater in some parts of BC. A lower threshold is appropriate for bedrock aquifers as they are less productive and their levels are more impacted more by extractions due to their confined nature and reduced recharge potential. Where LEARN MORE ABOUTTHE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION ATwww.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ 31 PART THREE Getting involved Douglas Lake Reflections Mike Wei 9 Participating in the Water Act modernization process The BC government is seeking a diverse range of perspectives and interests on a modernized Water Act. Many British Columbians want to influence the way water in BC is managed for the future. A variety of opportunities for input are available to make efficient use of your time and resources. 9.1 Online information and engagement The Living Water Smart (LWS) website www livingwatersmart.ca is the reference place for the WAM process and it is complemented by an online discussion forum or blog. Participation on the blog will be considered input into the Water Act modernization process. Participants can either observe or participate in the dialogue. The blog will help identify issues and potential impacts early and transparently in the policy development process. The blog is a quick and cost-effective engagement tool that allows a diverse range of values, viewpoints and interests to be raised and considered. Hosting the blog allows government to convene discussion across the province and respond to feedback. LEARN MORE ABOUTTHE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ PARTTHREE GETTING INVOLVED 9.3 Submission guide Protecting stream health and aquatic environments Goal One, Resources 10.2 ■ Indicate your level of support for the proposed objectives for protecting stream health and aquatic environments. ■ Which options do you prefer, and why? Are there others? ■ Under what conditions should a water allocation plan be developed and how should it be applied? Improving water governance Goal Two, Resources 10.4, 10.5, 10.6 ■ Indicate your level of support for the proposed objectives for improving water governance. ■ Which approach do you prefer, and why? Are there others? ■ What scale of watershed is most appropriate for water planning and management? ® What funding solutions might help to implement the approaches? ■ What are the important considerations for accountability, transparency and dispute resolution processes in any delegated or shared approach? ■ What are the benefits and implications of sharing roles for water stewardship? Introducing more flexibility and efficiency into the water allocation system GoalThree s Indicate your level of support for the proposed objectives for introducing more flexibility and efficiency into the water allocation system. ■ Which options do you prefer, and why? Are there others? ■ What considerations would help determine which water uses and extraction rates could be a permitted use (no water licence required)? What controls are needed? How should permitted use status be protected? Regulating groundwater extraction and use Goal Four, Goal Three, Resource 10.3 ■ Indicate your level of support for the objective proposed for regulating groundwater extraction and use. • Which thresholds do you prefer, and why? ■ What are the appropriate criteria for determining the priority areas for groundwater extraction and use? Additional input requested. ■ Your views are welcome on the proposed principles (pg 5). ■ Are there additional opportunities for the modernization of the Water Act to integrate with other federal and provincial legislation? ■ What are the appropriate criteria for determining at risk or priority watersheds? ■ How will these proposals specifically affect you or your community? ■ How can we improve the proposals so your interests are taken into account? ■ What kinds of collaborative processes would you like to see for future water stewardship? ■ Will the possible solutions adequately equip future generations to manage water sustainably? ■ What have we missed? �"w V oa� LEARN MORE ABOUTTHE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ RESOURCES usually small, rural, and may be responsible for local services such as fire protection and water servicing. LWS Living Water Smart. BC's Water Plan. Regional Water Manager is a government employee that is designated in writing as a Regional Water Manager (includes designated assistant or acting regional water managers). A Regional Water Manager is granted specific powers under the Water Act. Riparian zones /areas are between the land and a surface water body. Plants alongside the banks of the water body are called riparian vegetation and are important for the health of the stream and to stop bank erosion. Stream has a wide definition under the Water Act and includes a natural watercourse or source of supply, whether usually containing water or not, and a lake, river, creek, spring, ravine, swamp and gulch. Stream health is the combined measure of a stream's ecological integrity and function. This includes flow variability between seasons, the ability of the stream to provide envi- ronmental services, water quality and its resilience to disturbance. Stream health can be measured using water chemistry, biological monitoring and stream flow information. Surface water means water in a stream as defined in the Water Act. Undertaking means a project for the diversion and use of water or power and includes all the land and property, as well as the general scheme for aquisition and operation of the works. An undertaking is usually in reference to a community type water system for the benefit of the population of an area. WAM Water Act Modernization (the project to reform BC's Water Act). Water allocation plans are operational planning tools that help determine the quantity of water that is required in a watershed to protect stream health and identify the quantity of water still available for allocation. Currently they are voluntary and only used in Van- couver Island. Water governance includes the laws and regulations, the agencies and institutions that are responsible for decision making and the policies and procedures that are used to make decisions and manage water resources. wetlands refer to land that is saturated with water long enough to promote wetland or aquatic processes as indicated by poorly drained soils, water tolerant vegetation and various kinds of biological activity adapted to a wet environment. Wetlands usually support diverse forms of life, and provide significant benefits to the environment. Watershed is the region or area of land that drains into a river, river system, or other body of water. Watersheds are divided by mountains or hill ridges. Water stewardship is an ethic by which British Columbians care for, and are responsible for, the sustainability of our water resource and aquatic ecosystems. Works generally refer to the infrastructure that is built or installed to facilitate the diver- sion, use or storage of water, or for the production, transmission or use of electricity, or changes in and about a stream or stream channel (see the Water Act for a more detailed definition). LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ V 1 RESOURCES Table 2 Potential threats to stream health and pertinent provincial legislation Potential threats to stream health Example of activity Provincial legislation Direct discharge into stream r: Authorized point source discharges e.g. mines, Environmental Management Act sewage treatment plants, pulp mills, landfills Environmental Assessment Act Unauthorized dumping of material or Fish Protection Act unauthorized filling of wetlands or lakeshore Drinking Water Protection Act Cumulative effects of multiple land use WoterAct in watershed Diffuse discharges Input of pollutants from runoff caused by: Forest and Range Practices Act stormwater from urbanization, agricultural Fish Protection Act, activities, reduced forest cover, sediment and nu- Riparian Areas Regulation trient from forestry activities, and the develop- Environmental Management Act ment of transportation and energy corridors Drinking Water Protection Act Poorly functioning septic systems Public Health Act, Municipal Sewage Regulation Cumulative effects of multiple land use in watershed Changes to stream channel Inappropriate stream access or Forest and Range Practices Act and riparian vegetation crossing (e.g., livestock, ATVs, roads) leading to Fish Protection Act, Riparian Areas vegetation loss and erosion Regulation, and Sensitive Stream Regulation Straightening of a stream channel Isolating wetlands or other habitat from the main stream channel Barriers to fish movement from Water Act improper culvert design Withdrawal of water Excessive water withdrawal causing chronic Water Act degradation and reduced dilution of Environmental Management Act permitted discharges Environmental Assessment Act n Withdrawal during drought • Release of stored water causing unexpected flows • Groundwater pumping that is indirect connection Not regulated with surface water LEARN MORE ABOUT THE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ 39 RESOURCES 10.4 Comparison of possible water governance solutions Decision Making Accountability to consult with First Nations retained with the province in all approaches Functions exact functions to be worked out with public input CENTRALIZED APPROACH All decisions rest with the province All current functions rest with province. PLUS added functions including: ■ Planning and licensing groundwater extraction and use ■ Integration between natural resource agencies and federal government ■ Integrated regulation of connected groundwater and stream water resources ■ Improving information systems and capacity ■ Defining'stream health'and determining environmental flow needs ■ Water allocation planning Provincial Support N/A SHARED APPROACH Delegation ofsome decisions to locally elected or appointed representatives, such as to municipal, regional district or other local authorities Province to retain high risk, multiple -watershed or multi agency decision making Partner agencies keep existing functions PLUS could take on: ■ Regional visioning for water ■ Approving low risk changes in and about streams ■ Compliance and enforcement • Public education and outreach activities • Use Regional Growth Strategies, Official Community Plans or other land use plans to implement water priorities ■ Establish advisory committees for First Nation and stakeholder involvement ■ Laws, policies, institutional structures and funding ■ Setting standards, improving infor- mation systems and raising capacity, ■ Defining'stream health'and deter- mining environmental flow needs ■ Water allocation planning and licensing ■ Integration between natural resource agencies and groundwater and surface water resources ■ Audit and dispute resolution processes DELEGATED APPROACH Delegation of most decisions to locally elected board or committee with cross sector and government (all levels) representation Province to retain high risk, multiple -watershed or multi agency decision making Watershed Agencies could take on the following functions: ■ Regional visioning and watershed planning ■ Water allocation planning and licensing (includes determination of environmental flow needs) • Approving changes in and about streams ■ Oversight over transfer or extension of water rights ■ Compliance and enforcement ■ Drought and flood respnse ■ Public education and outreach activities ■ Watershed restoration ■ Reporting on watershed health ■ Formal opportunities to influence resource management and land use planning ■ Laws, policies, institutional structures and funding ■ Setting standards, improving information systems and raising capacity ■ Defining'stream health'and environmental flow needs assessment methods ■ Audit and dispute resolution processes RESOURCES 10.6 Map of existing water district and Regional District boundaries. LEARN MORE ABOUTTHE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ 43 GOALTHREE Introduce more flexibility and efficiency in the water allocation system OBJECTIVES POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS OBJECTIVE ONE The water allocation system emphasizes and encourages efficiencies in water use and in the administration of water as a natural resource OPTION A OR OPTION B Government determines actual needs in Codes for efficient infrastructure and practices in relation to a proposed undertaking on the different sectors are developed (in partnership basis of efficient practices and works. with the sector) and the modernized Water Act requires compliance with these codes. AND I 11 OPTION C OR OPTION D The modernized Water Act enables the use of Review rules for the transfer and incentives and economic instruments such as apportionments of existing water rights. penalties, pricing or incentives to encourage water efficiency. WI L 101 AND OPTION E OR OPTION F Permitted uses would be defined and allowed Permitted uses would be defined and allowed under the Act in accordance with regulations under the Act in accordance with regulations applied in a consistent manner throughout that might apply differently throughout the province. the province. OPTION G Voluntary self registration of the permitted use withdrawal. AND AND OR OPTION H Required self registration of the permitted use withdrawal. To improve decision making times and enforcement, existing water licence holders and applicants may potentially be responsible for: OPTION I Providing more detailed information about the proposed use and efficiency measures for licence applications or changes; OPTION 1 Documenting potential environmental impacts and effects on other users in licence applications or changes; OPTION K Seeking consent from, or undertaking consultation with, affected parties for licence applications or changes; OPTION L Measuring and reporting actual water use when demonstrating compliance with licence conditions; OPTION M Reporting well levels for regulated groundwater users; OPTION N Self -registering wells, especially where groundwater is in direct hydraulic connection with surface water or in areas of known quantity concern; or OPTION 0 ANY combination of the above. THIS TABLE CONTINUES ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE RESOURCES GOAL FOUR Regulate groundwater extraction and use in priority areas and for large withdrawals OBJECTIVES POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS OBJECTIVE 1 OPTION A Groundwater extraction and use is Large groundwater withdrawals are: regulated in priority (critical) areas 500 m3/day and for all large withdrawals for wells drilled in unconsolidated, sand and gravel aquifers, and 100 m3/day for wells drilled into consolidated bedrock aquifers, or if otherwise determined by a Water Management Plan. AND OPTION B Large groundwater withdrawals are: 250 m3/day for wells drilled in unconsolidated, sand and gravel aquifers, and 100 m3/day for wells drilled into consolidated bedrock aquifers or if otherwise determined by a Water Management Plan. OPTIONS FOR DETERMINING PRIORITY AREAS: A. Heavy groundwater extraction and use; B. Area of known quantity concern; C. Groundwater in direct hydraulic connection with surface water in areas of known quantity concern; D. Significant population who is reliant on groundwater for drinking water; E. Trans -boundary aquifers; F. Basins where surface water is at or near the allocation limit; or G. ANY combination of the above. LEARN MORE ABOUTTHE WATER ACT MODERNIZATION AT www.livingwatersmart.ca/water-act/ 47 Water is everyone's concern and we our all play a role in determining BC's water future. We would like to hear &oni you and encourage you to to share your thoughts on the kind of future you envision. for BC's water.