HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-11-15 Workshop Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA
November 15, 2010
9:00 a.m.
Blaney Room, 1st Floor, Municipal Hall
The purpose of the Council Workshop is to review and discuss policies and
other items of interest to Council. Although resolutions may be passed at
this meeting, the intent is to make a consensus decision to send an item to
Council for debate and vote or refer the item back to staff for more
information or clarification.
REMINDERS
November 15, 2010
Closed Council following Workshop
Committee of the Whole Meeting 1:00 P.M.
November 16, 2010
Public Hearing 7:00 p.m.
1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
2. MINUTES -November 1, 2010
3. PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
4, UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
4.1 Zoning Bylaw Review Update 2010
Staff report dated November 5, 2010 providing an update on the review of Zoning
Bylaw No. 3510-1985.
4.2 Sewer to Correctional Facilities Update
Verbal report by the Municipal Engineer
Council Workshop
November 15, 2010
Page 2 of 4
4.3 UBCM School Community Connections Round 2 Funding Program:
Supporting Neighbourhood Learning Centres
Staff report dated November 10, 2010 recommending that the funding
application, in partnership with School District No. 42, for the UBCM School
Community Connections Round 2 Funding Program: Supporting Neighbourhood
Learning Centres be approved.
4.4 Alcohol Reform Response to Rich Coleman, Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor
General
Staff report dated November 10, 2010 recommending that letters regarding the
Action on Alcohol Reform be approved and forwarded to the Minister of Public
Safety and Solicitor General, the BC Mayors and Councils and the Union of British
Columbia Municipalities' Executive.
4.5 Response to FCM Quality of Life Report: Mending the Frayed Social Safety Net
Staff report dated November 10, 2010 recommending that a letter expressing
support of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities ("FCM") advocacy work in the
delivery of social services be approved and forwarded to the FCM.
(For a copy of the complete FCM Quality of Life Report please refer to the August
30, 2010 Council Workshop agenda and reports)
4.6 Town Centre Investment Incentives Program - Implementation Schedule
Staff report dated November 9, 2010 recommending that the Town Centre
Investment Incentives Program Implementation Schedule be endorsed and that
the first set of enabling bylaws be brought forward at the November 23, 2010
Council Meeting.
Council Workshop
November 15, 2010
Page 3 of 4
5. CORRESPONDENCE
The following correspondence has been received and requires a response. Staff is
seeking direction from Council on each item. Options that Council may consider include:
a) Acknowledge receipt of correspondence and advise that no further action will be
taken,
b) Direct staff to prepare a report and recommendation regarding the subject matter.
c) Forward the correspondence to a regular Council meeting for further discussion,
d) Other.
Once direction is given the appropriate response will be sent.
5.1 Union of British Columbia Municipalities - Proposed Changes to the Ultimate
Limitation Period
Memo dated October 26, 2010 from Councillor Barbara Steel, President, Union of
British Columbia Municipalities requesting that a letter of support of the proposed
direction within the White Paper on Limited Act Reform be submitted to the
Ministry of Attorney General.
Recommendation: submit letter of support
6. BRIEFING ON OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST/QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL
7. MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
S. ADJOURNMENT
Checked by:.
Date:
Council Workshop
November 15, 2010
Page 4 of 4
Rules for Holding a Closed Meeting
A part of a council meeting may be closed_ to the public if the subject matter being considered relates to one
or more of the following:
(a) personal information about an identifiable individual who holds or is being considered for a position as
an officer, employee or agent of the municipality or another position appointed by the municipality;
(b) personal information about an identifiable individual who is beinjZ considered for a municipal award or
honour, or who has offered to provide a gift to the municipality on condition of anonymity;
(c) labour relations or employee negotiations;
(d) the security of propert of the municipality;
(e) the ac uisition disposition or ex ro riation of land or i rovements, if the council considers that
disclosure might reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality;
(f) law enforcement, if the council considers that disclosure might reasonably be expected to harm the
conduct of an investigation under or enforcement of an enactment;
(g) litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality;
(h) an administrative tribunal hearing or potential administrative tribunal hearing affecting the municipality,
other than a hearing to be conducted by the council or a delegate of council
(i) the receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor -client privilege, including communications necessary for
that purpose;
Q) information that is prohibited or information that if it were presented in a document would be prohibited
from disclosure under section 21 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act;
(k) negotiations and related discussions respecting the proposed provision of a municipal service that are at
their preliminary stages and that, in the view of the council, could reasonably be expected to harm the
interests of the municipality if they were held in public;
(1) discussions with municipal officers and employees respecting municipal objectives, measures and
progress reports for the purposes of preparing an annual report under section 98 [annual municipal
report]
(m) a matter that, under another enactment is such that the public may be excluded from the meeting;
(n) the consideration of whether a council meeting should be closed under a provision of this subsection of
subsection (2)
(o) the consideration of whether the authority under section 91 (other persons attending closed meetings)
should be exercised in relation to a council meeting.
(p) information relating to local Vvernment participation in provincial negotiations with First Nations, where
an agreement provides that the information is to be kept confidential.
DeepRoots
Greater HeDISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE:
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN:
SUBJECT: Zoning Bylaw Review update 2010
hEIX�l�Y�l9���1►�ilul_1:�'fi
November 5, 2010
Workshop
The Planning Department's Business Plan identified a review of the District's current Zoning Bylaw
No. 3510-1985. The goal of this review is to achieve a Zoning Bylaw that:
• Aligns with current regulatory language, Provincial legislation and policies in the 2006 Official
Community Plan;
• Identifies and resolves issues/concerns raised by the Public and District departments;
• Responds to new market trends and the District's sustainability goals and vision; and
• Improves consistency and format to result in a Zoning Bylaw that is user-friendly, easily
interpreted and effective in regulating land use.
The following report provides an update on the significant work already accomplished; the on -going
project and the anticipated time -line to complete the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the report entitled "Zoning Bylaw Review update 2010" dated November 5, 2010 be received
as information.
BACKGROUND:
The District of Maple Ridge has had three comprehensive Zoning Bylaws since the early 1960s, each
of which acted as a foundation for the next and introduced new components that were relevant at
that time. Zoning Bylaws are technical and "organic "in nature i.e. always evolving or reacting to new
trends & policies and are expected to ensure consistency for implementation. The District's current
Zoning Bylaw is no exception to this and has been amended many times since 1985. Minor Zoning
Bylaw amendments have occurred on a fairly regular basis over the past years, including the most
recent Zoning Bylaw text amendment & house -keeping report that Council approved in 2009.
However a review of the current Zoning Bylaw to continue ensuring its usefulness and credibility is
valuable.
I, W
DISCUSSION:
On October 29, 2009, Council gave direction to begin the "Zoning Bylaw Review". Since then, efforts
have been focussed on important background work such as: information gathering; research of
issues and problem identification; coordinating with other departments for their specific areas of
concern; tracking the revisions; looking at various alternative bylaw formats; testing other formats as
examples and identifying key deficiencies and inconsistencies. This ground work was accomplished
internally with existing resources to streamline the review process when the consultant was hired.
The Zoning Bylaw Request for Proposal was published in late July 2010 and six proposals were
received. Of these, three proponents were shortlisted for interviewing. The successful proponent is
the team of Halcrow Consulting Inc & Brook & Associates. Halcrow & Brook have relevant recent
experience with the Zoning Bylaw review work with Squamish, Rossland, Summerland and White
Rock. They propose a well balanced "two tasks: one team" approach, with Halcrow focusing on the
technical components and Brook focusing on developing and facilitating the consultation strategy.
Both are technically qualified with a team of experts and have in-house graphic and visualization
skills. Their proposal meets the District time -line and budget for this project and they have a good
understanding of the importance of a clear, concise and user-friendly Zoning Bylaw.
PROJECT SCOPE and PROPOSED TIME -LINE:
Considerable effort has already been expended on defining the scope which helps determine the
resources, time and efficiency needed to complete the review. In general, the scope of the review
includes the following: identification of issues/ concerns/ discrepancies; re -formatting for ease of
use and language; review of all zones & definitions for consistency; possible consolidation of zones;
intensive review of the commercial and industrial zones; introduction of additional illustrations/
graphics as required; introducing provisions that reflect the goals of the District and are consistent
with the Official Community Plan policies; staff & public consultation sessions as required; ensuring
legality and updating zoning maps. In general, the consultant team will be required to undertake a
review of all sections of the Zoning Bylaw at various levels, including preparing material and
attending any sessions held as part of the consultation program and Council meetings.
The consultants "Halcrow Consulting Inc & Brook & Associates" have proposed a four -phased
process (Appendix A) as outlined below:
• Phase 1: Issue Identification (November 2010 to January 2011);
• Phase 2: Technical Review and Workshops (January 2011 to March 2011);
• Phase 3: Draft Bylaw and Consultation (March 2011 to May 2011);
• Phase 4- Finalize Bylaw and Council approval (May 2011 to July 2011).
Important background work completed internally will provide a "spring -board" for the consultant for
phase 1. A start-up meeting with the consultant was conducted on October 25, 2010 and the
Contract finalized on November 08, 2010.
On November 17, 2010, the first meeting for consultation purposes is scheduled. The morning
session is meant for an internal working group with representatives of District staff from all relevant
departments. The afternoon session is meant for an external working group consisting of user
groups such as local builders; developers; realtors; consultants; architects; engineering & survey
professionals. This will ensure input from a good mix of those who either use or are affected by the
Zoning Bylaw. Contact has been made via phone with representatives of these groups and the
consultant has sent letters to the external group. The response has been enthusiastic. It is expected
that roughly 20 individuals of the external meeting will attend this meeting. Relevant representatives
from the internal group have also confirmed attendance. The first meeting will focus on the following:
• Address current deficiencies in the Zoning Bylaw;
• Examples of any existing regulations in other jurisdictions that work better to deal specific
issues/ concerns;
• Review of any sections within the Zoning Bylaw that address specific departmental concerns;
A working group committee member is expected to meet on two separate occasions: first meeting as
described above and the second meeting in April 2011 to review the final draft bylaw. Each meeting
will be facilitated by Brook & Associates and results provided to Halcrow Consulting Inc.
CONCLUSION:
The importance of a clear, concise, legally enforceable and user-friendly Zoning Bylaw is the goal of
this review. The Zoning Bylaw Review is a significant piece of work and will involve the participation
of key interest groups in its update. The consultant is anticipated to thoroughly review the bylaw and
with assistance from planning staff, complete the task on time and within budget.
Prepared by: ChucKdoddard, B. A, M.A (Plan)
Mankker of Development and Environmental services/ Approving Officer and
Prepared by: Rasi Acharya, B-Arch, M-Tech (Ping.), UD (SFU)
Planner II
Ap oved b 'Ap MCP, MCIP
❑ r of Planni
dl::21�
Approved b Frank Quinn, MBA, PEn
!/ GM: Public Works "evopment Services
Concurrence: . L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The follow appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A: Halcrow- Study Approach
Appendix A
7.0 STUDYAPPROACH
Consistent with the District's outline of Scope of Work contained in the Request for Proposals, Halcrow and
Brook propose the following study approach:
PROJECT
START UP
REVIEW OF i
FACILITATE STAFF &
REGULATORY AND PHASE 1: ISSUE STAKEHOLDER
POLICY CONTEXT IDENTIFICATION - WORKSHOPS
k SUMMARY REPORT TO
f DISTRICT STAFF
2 TECH WORKING
SESSIONS WITH STAFF
PHASE 2: TECHNICAL
REVIEW & WORKSHOPS
SHARE TECH REVIEW
I
WITH LEGALCOU SEL
SUMMARY REPORT TO
STAFF
[PHASE 3 DDRAFT BYLAW
& CONSULTATION
—W —
1 COUNCIL WKSP,1
REVIEWIMEETING
i
REVIEW OF DRAFT
STAKEHOLDER WKSP
WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
j
BYLAW 1
& 1 OPEN HOUSE
V
FINALISE AND 1 4: FINALISE PUBLIC HEARING
DELIVER i FPHASE
YLAW & APPROVAL
71 TECHNICAL REVIEW E� CONSULTATION
Process Diagram to Review District of Maple Ridge's Zoning Bylaw
11
RIDGEMAPLE
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE: November 10, 2010
FILE NO:
ATTN: , Workshop
UBCM School Community Connections Round 2 Funding Program:
Supporting Neighbourhood Learning Centres
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The School Community Connections Funding Program is jointly managed by the Union of BC
Municipalities and the BC School Trustees Association on behalf of the B.C. Ministry of Education.
The program is designed to promote sustainable and innovative collaboration between school
boards and local governments with the goal of ensuring that school spaces benefit communities by
revitalizing schools as centres for community learning and activity.
School District No. 42 and the District of Maple Ridge, working in partnership with the Maple Ridge -
Pitt Meadows-Katzie Community Network, applied and received all three phases of funding under
Round 1 of the School Community Connections program. This funding was utilized to design,
renovate and in December, 2009, open the `Hive' at Eric Langton Elementary.
The proposal (attached) prepared for this Round 2 of the School Community Connections program
builds on the successes of the Neighourhood Learning Centre model at the Hive. At the November 3,
2010 Social Planning Advisory Committee meeting, a resolution was passed to forward a
recommendation to Council to approve the School Community Connections Round 2 funding joint
application between the District of Maple and School District No. 42, with the District of Maple acting
as the primary applicant.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the proposed UBCM School Community Connections Round 2: Supporting Neighbourhood
Learning Centres funding application, in partnership with School District No. 42, attached to the
staff report dated November 10, 2010 be approved and,
That the District of Maple Ridge act as the primary applicant and agree to the Terms and Conditions
as outlined in the report.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
In 2005 the first School Community Connections (SCC) program, jointly managed by the
Union of BC Municipalities and the BC School Trustees Association on behalf of the B.C.
Ministry of Education, was launched with an emphasis on encouraging greater community
use of school facilities and to assist school boards and local governments to revitalize
schools as centres for community learning and activity. School District No. 42 and the
Page 1 of 3 4,3
District of Maple Ridge, in partnership with the Maple Ridge -Pitt Meadows-Katzie Community
Network, successfully received funding over the three phases of the program and developed
the model for the `Hive' Neighbourhood Centre at Eric Langton Elementary School which
officially opened in December of 2009.
Under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), between fourteen community partners and
the School District, partners are working together to meet the needs of the school community
and neighbourhood. The number and diversity of programs at the Hive is continuing to grow.
The 2010 Round 2 of the School Community Connections funding program is intended to
continue the original goals of encouraging boards of education and local governments to
work cooperatively and with community partners to create neighbourhood learning centres
and expand the use of schools to provide community services both during and outside school
hours.
The proposal for funding under this Round 2 of the School Community Connections program
(attached) builds on, and enhances, the successes of the Hive Neighbourhood Learning
Centre model at Eric Langton School through an expansion and strengthening of the
Neighbourhood Steering Committee. This investment in the Neighbourhood Committee will
result in a dynamic engagement creating a neighbourhood place of learning that strengthens
the community as a whole. The grant for $25,000 (and an additional $5000 that may be
made available depending on the number of applications received) has been prepared.
At the November 3, 2010 meeting, the Social Planning Advisory Committee passed a
resolution recommending that Council to approve the School Community Connections Round
2 funding joint application between the District of Maple Ridge and School District No.42,
with the District of Maple Ridge acting as the primary applicant.
The grant criteria stipulates that a board of education and local government must apply
together with one identified as the primary applicant and the other as the partnering agency.
In Round 1, the School District acted as the primary applicant. For Round 2, due to the
Neighbourhood development focus, it was determined that the District of Maple Ridge would
be best suited to act as the primary applicant. Under the terms and conditions of the grant,
primary applicants are responsible for: financial management and reporting, project
evaluation and final reporting.
b) Desired Outcome:
To make greater utilization of School District No. 42 facilities for broader community
purposes. To ensure that local school spaces benefit the community and to revitalize
schools as centres for community learning and activity by providing opportunities for a
collaborative approach to meeting the needs of the school community, neighbourhood, and
greater community.
c) Strategic Alignment:
The goal is to strive for enhanced service levels, quality of life and independence by citizens.
This project would contribute to improving community quality of life.
d) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
Participation in the development of this project has been noted in the 2010 Social Planning
Business Plan that is currently being considered. In addition, Neighbourhood Development
Page 2 of 3
and children and youth recreation services at the Neighbourhood level are a direction
outlined in the 2010 Parks, Recreation and Cultural Master Plan. This grant will assist in
providing resources aligned with these directions.
Acting as the primary applicant for Round 2 of the School Community Connections funding
does not require a financial commitment from the District of Maple Ridge beyond staff time.
CONCLUSIONS:
Working in partnership with School District No. 42, an application for funding under the UBCM
School Community Connection Round 2 program has been prepared. The Social Planning Advisory
Committee has forwarded a recommendation that Council approve the application including
approving the terms and conditions of District of Maple Ridge acting as the primary applicant. This
funding would enable the Hive MOU partners to work together to build on, and enhance, the
successes of the Neighbourhood Learning Centre model at Eric Langton School.
Prepared by: Sue Wheeler
C munity Services Director
Approved by. David Boag
Acting General Manager: u ity Development, Parks and Recreation
Concurrence: J.L. (.Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
sw/attachments
Page 3 of 3
17W
A British Columbia
School Trustees
BRITISH Association
COLUMBIA
The Em Place on Earth
School Community Connections
Supporting Neighbourhood Learning Centres
E-mail: Igps@ubcm.ca
Mail: 525 Government Street, Victoria, BC, V8V OA8
Fax: (250) 356-5119
2010 APPLICATION FORM — ROUND 2
Applications are due November 19 2010. Please type directly in this form or print and
complete. Use additional space or pages wherever required. Thank you in advance for your
cooperation.
Questions? Contact Local Government Program Services at Igps@ubcm.ca or (250) 356-5134
Please note: the main contact persons must be from the school district or local government.
Applications with main contacts from individual schools, school associations or community
organizations will not be accepted.
1. PRIMARY APPLICANT
School District or Local Government:
District of Maple Ridge
Contact person: Sue Wheeler
Phone: 604-467-7308
Other Contact: Shawn Matthewson
Phone: 604-467-7464
2. PARTNERING AGENCY
School District or Local Government:
School District #42
Contact person: Laurie Meston
Phone: 604-463-4200
Other Contact:
Mailing Address: 11995 Haney Place, Maple
Ridge, V2X 6A9
Position: Community Services Director
E-mail: swheeler@mapleridge.ca
Position: Recreation Coordinator
E-mail: smatthewson@mapleridge.ca
Mailing Address: 22225 Brown Avenue,
Maple Ridge, BC V2X 81\16
Position: Director
E-mail: Imeston@sd42.ca
Position:
Phone: E-mail:
3. NAME OF PROJECT. Please include the location and a description of the project, for
example "Engels Elementary Kitchen Renovation" or `School District 99 Partner Consultation"
"Cross Pollination - Building on the Success of the "HIVE" "
® Consultation & Planning
❑ Minor Renovations
❑ Both
For projects focused on minor renovations, please describe the consultation and planning
process that has taken place to identify the renovation project as a community priority. If
applicable, please attach any relevant plans to your application.
5. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT. Please provide a general overview of the proposed project,
including the intended outcomes. For renovation projects, please indicate the location.
This proposal will build on and enhance the successes of the Neighbourhood Learning Center
model (HIVE) at Eric Langton Elementary School through an expansion and strengthening of the
Neighbourhood Steering Committee and through connecting the Steering Committee to a
network of neighbourhoods. A foundational aspect of this project has been to ensure that the
talents and skills of those living in the neighbourhood are utilized and this premise is in fact,
integral to the success of the model. The HIVE model is designed to promote capacity building,
strengthen resiliency and empower families and communities to take responsibility for their
children's healthy development and the health of their community. Support of the
Neighbourhood Steering Committee will result in a dynamic engagement creating a
neighbourhood place of learning that strengthens the community as a whole.
There is an abundance of evidence that indicates that strong neighbourhoods contribute to
providing opportunities that strengthen the healthy growth and development of children and
their families. The learning from this project has supported the belief that when the
community school encompasses the neighbourhood, the neighbourhood will become the site of
learning. Neighbourhood members have had the opportunity to develop as leaders, teachers
and mentors. As they have increased their capacity to influence their children's education they
began to see themselves as active citizens with an ability to influence and contribute to their
community. As the neighbourhood continues to develop a culture of learning, this motivation
will help parents,children and youth develop a sense of belonging and place.
Project Goal:
To continue to strengthen and increase neighbourhood involvement through the expansion of
the Eric Langton HIVE Neighbourhood Steering Committee; to increase connections with the
HIVE service provider partners and the Neighbourhood Steering Committee.
Project Outcomes
Increased engagement of neighborhoods with
between neighbourhood committees
Neiqhbourhood members take on a increased
one another and/or increased connections
IeadershiD[mentorshio) role
2010 SCC ROUND 2: Supporting Neighbourhood Learning Centres 2
Increased use of schools during and after school hours
Increased awareness of the HIVE Neighbourhood Learning Center in the community
Increased awareness of the importance of how strong neighbourhoods contribute to the health
of individuals and communities
Increased awareness of what others are doing to make a difference in their neighbourhoods
Increased activities available for children during noon and after school timeslots
Increased sustainability of the Neighbourhood Learning Center due to additional partnerships
and activities
Project Actions
A series of workshops to enhance capacity
Steering Committee Development
Connect steering committee to other neighbourhood committees associated with the Building
Community Solutions project
Participate in a neighbourhood conference
Presentations to District of Maple Ridge Council, School Board, Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Parks
and Leisure Commission, District of Maple Ridge Social Planning Advisory Committee, District
Parent Advisory Committee and the Community Network planning table
No cost recreation programming at Glenwood elementary (satellite school)reducing barriers and
building protective factors for children and their families
Outputs
2 workshops
4-6 Neighbourhood Steering Committee Meetings
1 neighbourhood conference
6 presentations
Increased programming and activities responding to neighbourhood need
4 six week programs will be offered at Glenwood Elementary either at noon hour or after school
Approximately 80 children/youth attending recreation programs at Glenwood Elementary
6. MEETING SCC/NLC OBJECTIVES. Describe how your project meets the objectives of the
Supporting Neighbourhood Learning Centres program as described in Section 2 of the
Program Guide.
The School Community Connections project has been a vision of and part of the work of the
Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Katzie Community Network. The Community Network (Appendix
B) is a collaborative local planning table consisting of 150 members representing
approximately 80 organizations. The Community Network has numerous standing
committees including the Community Literacy, Early Childhood Development and Middle
Childhood Matters Committees. The strategic planning processes undertaken by these
committees has informed and guided the work at the HIVE. One of the key goals of the ECD
Committee has been service integration. The HIVE model has moved the committee closer
to meeting this goal. One of the priorities of the 2010 Community Literacy Plan which
weaves both the Aboriginal Education Enhancement Agreement and the District Literacy Plan
into its mandate is to c000rdinate and cooperate with School District #42, Fraser Valley
Regional Library and other community service providers to link all levels of literacy across our
communities. The HIVE has a number of literacy programs that link School District, the
Library and other community partners.
The original proposal created an innovative and comprehensive community -based move
towards a Neighbourhood Learning Community School Model. Under this model, the school
has become the "Hub" of inte rated pro rams and services for children and families.
2010 SCC ROUND 2: Supporting Neighbourhood Learning Centres 3
Currently fourteen programs are run out of the HIVE including a Strong Start Centre, Active
Kids Club Before and After School Care ( a joint Parks and Leisure Services and School
District 42 program), Healthy Babies, Big Brothers and Big Sisters, Parent Support Group,
Clothing Exchange Program and several other programs. (Program Guide/ HIVE Brochure -
Appendix C/D) The thirteen community partners that participate and contribute to
programming at the HIVE have signed on to a comprehensive Memorandum of
Understanding. (Appendix E) This Memorandum of Understanding was developed with all of
the parties participating in a visioning process.
The provision of service at the HIVE is based on the needs of the community, neighbourhood
and school. The model is designed to be flexible and dynamic thus responding to a variety
of needs as they fluctuate and change. Programming at the HIVE is collaborative and strives
to integrate a number of services in order to better support children and families and to
increase sustainability of programs and the HIVE itself. An example of an integrated
program is the Pre -Strong Start, a partnership between Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows
Community Services and Fraser Health Authority Healthy Babies, this program supports
mothers to attend the Strong Start Centre currently located at the HIVE. Many of the young
and at risk mothers were not comfortable attending the Strong Start Centres. Service
providers recognized this and put in place a program that helps prepare these mothers to
attend the Strong Start by providing them with some support, some additional parenting
skills and by introducing them to the space. This innovative program has not only supported
several mothers to attend the Strong Start Centre but it has enhanced their capacity to
influence the health of their children.
The HIVE model offers an approach to neighbourhood engagement that is both unique and
flexible enough to provide a template for use in other areas. In terms of community
capacity building and neighbourhood development,another project- Building Community
Solutions, has provided a framework and substantial learning's. This project has nurtured
and supported the development of two neigbhourhood associations, both of which have
strong geographical and foundational links to their community schools. By edifying the link
between the Building Community Solutions neighbourhood network and the HIVE
Neighbourhood Steering Committee, the potential for increased community use of schools at
other sites is a real possibility. As each neighbourhood learns from eachother the
connections and possibilities grow.
7. COMMUNITY PARTNERS. Applications must be submitted by a board of education and
local government as per Sections 3 and 5 of the Program Guide. Please list any other
community partners:
Please see attached Memorandum of Understanding for the HIVE:
Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services
Fraser Health- Public Health/Matrix
Ministry of Children and Family Development
Family Education and Support Centre
Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Community Services
Westcoast Family Resources
Big Brothers Big Sisters
Ridge Meadows Child Development Centre
C.E.E.D. Centre
Eric Langton Parent Advisory Council
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
2010 SCC ROUND 2: Supporting Neighbourhood Learning Centres 4
PLEA Community Services Society of BC
Cythera Transition House Society
S. PROJECT COMPLETION. Please provide the anticipated end date of the project. Please
note the final report is due within 30 days of the completion of your project and no later than
January 31. 2012.
December 31, 2011
9. EVALUATION. Please describe what tools will be used to evaluate the project and how the
results of the evaluation be used or shared.
Quantity and quality of family and community programs and activities will increase at the
HIVE and at least 1 other school- Program evaluations by parents and participants
Number of participants accessing programs and actives at their neighbourhood school will
increase
Number of participants attending presentations
Number of participants on each neighbourhood steering committee
Results of program evaluations
Workshop evaluations
Participant feedback from the Neighbourhood Conference
Focus group with Neighbourhood Steering Committee
The results will be shared:
With MOU partners and the Community Connections Committee and Neighbourhood Steering
Committee
Through the six presentations listed in project actions section
In the interim and final reports
10. FUNDING REQUEST. Based on the availability of $25,000 per school district, please
indicate the total funds you are requesting from SCC for this project:
$25,000
Depending on the number of applications that are submitted, an additional $5,000 erg school
district may be available. If you wish to a ply for additional funds lease indicate how much
2010 SCC ROUND 2: Supporting Neighbourhood Learning Centres 5
of the $5,000 you wish to apply to this project:
$5,000
11. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. Please use this space to add any other relevant information
about your project.
The location of the Neighbourhood Learning Community School -HIVE was chosen using the
EDI data. This area of Maple Ridge has currently the highest level of vulnerability according
to the EDI scores. This is also an area with below average income, below average
educational levels and a high level of transiency creating conditions for children and
families that put them at greater risk for a number of social and health concerns. The social
determinants of health which include income and social status, social support networks,
education, employment and working conditions, physical and social environments, biology
and genetic endowment, personal health practices and coping skills, healthy child
development, gender, culture, and health services are now recognized to have a significant
impact on individual health and well being. Research also shows that the social environment
in which a child is raised can have a profound impact on their lives. Children raised in
healthy and safe environments that include a safe place to live, a safe neigbhourhood,
connections to caring adults, access to food and stable family income grow up healthier and
more likely to become healthy adults.
Glenwood Elementary is a satellite school in the same area as Eric Langton. With the original
School Community Connections funding, the committee had hoped to develop "hubs" at
different satellites throughout the community. Glenwood Elementary would be the site of the
first satellite programming. Incidentally, the level of vulnerability at this school is extremely
high as well. Through consultation with the neighbourhood and teaching community at Eric
Langton Elementary, it became apparent that enrichment opportunities were not available to
many of the students at these schools as the barriers to access them, that is, cost,
transportation, etc. were too great. Research has shown that beyond the obvious heath
benefits, children that have access to recreation programming do better at school and have
stronger connections to community and family. There is also a growing body of research that
shows that recreation can mitigate the affects of poverty. Currently Maple Ridge Pitt
Meadows Parks and Leisure Services offers a number of programs at the HIVE. By offering
programs at Glenwood, a greater number of children would have access to recreation and the
link between School District and Parks and Leisure Services would be expanded. There is
also an opportunity using our community development model to build the capacity of the
Glenwood neigbhourhood through this consultation and planning process. Through building
the capacity of the neighbourhood, the potential health and social benefits increase.
Please see Appendices A through E.
2010 SCC ROUND 2: Supporting Neighbourhood Learning Centres
12. RE UIRED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. The following items are required to be
attached to your application:
❑ Detailed budget indicating proposed income and expenditure of SCC funds.
Please submit a budget based on the availability of $25,000 per school district. If
you are also applying for funds from the additional $5,000 that may be available
per school district, please add a statement in your budget indicating the additional
request amount and the specific line item (or project activity) that the additional
funds would be applied to.
® Council, Board or Board of Education resolution from the primary applicant
® Letter of support from the partnering agency
13. OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
® Letter(s) of support from other partners
❑ Copies of any relevant plans that support minor renovation projects
2010 SCC ROUND 2: Supporting Neighbourhood Learning Centres
School Community Connections Round 2-
2010
Item
Expense
In Kind
Contributions
Planning and consultation with
Neighbourhood Steering Committee
$18,000
♦ Services of Community
Development Coordinator
♦ Family programming at the
Hive facilitated by
Neighbourhood Steering
Committee and Coordinator
Workshops
$2,500
♦ Topics to be determined
through neighbourhood
consultation
Neighbourhood Conference
$1000
$600
Staff support
Meetings with Neighbourhood
$1000
Steering Committee and other
stakeholder groups
• Refreshments
• Supplies
• Event activities supplies
Recreation Programming:
- Programmer
- Program Staff
$3775
- Program Manuals/Parent
$2100
Packages
$250
Use of Space: (School District 42)
$1608
Use of Sports Equipment: (School
$600
District/Parks and Leisure Services)
Program Supplies for School Based -
Recreation
$1125
$75
Promotion
$250
$250
Total Grant Contribution
$30,000
$3133
Total in kind contribution
MAPLEr
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE:
and Members of Council FILE NO:
November 10, 2010
Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Workshop
Alcohol Reform Response to Rich Coleman, Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor
General
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At the April 19, 2010 Workshop, Council reviewed correspondence received from the BC Coalition for
Action on Alcohol Reform requesting a letter of support be forwarded to the Provincial Government
endorsing the recommendations contained in the Centre for Addictions Research of BC's Alcohol
Reduction Strategy. Council passed a motion authorizing SPAC to send a letter in support.
The letter (attached), co -signed by the Mayor and the Chair of the Social Planning Advisory
Committee (SPAC) was sent to the Minister of Health, the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor
General, the Minister of Housing and Social Development, the Provincial Health Officer, and the
Vancouver Island Health Authority. Three responses were received by Council from: the Provincial
Health Officer, the BC Coalition for Action on Alcohol Reform, and the Minister of Housing and Social
Development.
At the July 19, 2010 Workshop, Council received the letter dated July 5, 2010 from Minister Rich
Coleman, Minister of Housing and Social Development (attached) acknowledging receipt of a letter
supporting recommendations made by the BC Coalition for Action on Alcohol Reform and indicating
the Provincial Government will not regulate retail alcohol pricing. Council passed a motion to forward
the letter to SPAC for response.
At the November 3, 2010 SPAC meeting the committee reviewed and endorsed three letters
(attached) to be forwarded to Council for approval. The letters are addressed to: Minister Coleman,
Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General, BC Mayors and Councils, and UBCM Executive.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the letters addressed to: Minister Coleman, Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General; BC
Mayors and Councils; and UBCM Executive, attached to the staff report dated November 10, 2010,
be endorsed and jointly signed by the Mayor and the Chair of the Social Planning Advisory
Committee.
11136*YK11**1 R]►A
a) Background Context:
The documents referenced in the BC Coalition's correspondence were also reviewed by SPAC
at the request of the Substance Misuse Prevention Committee (SMPC), a Standing
Page 1 of 2 4A
Committee of the Maple Ridge -Pitt Meadows-Katzie Community Network. SMPC encouraged
the Social Planning Advisory Committee to endorse BC Centre for Addiction's Research
publication: Alcohol Pricing: Proposed Incentives for BC Drinkers to Make Healthy Choices.
In response, SPAC proposed that Council forward a motion on the Impact of Alcohol Pricing to
the Union of BC Municipalities for consideration at its annual meeting. Council approved
SPAC's proposed motion at the June 21, 2010 Workshop and forwarded the motion to
UBCM. Although the motion proposed by Maple Ridge did not go forward, a similar motion
proposed by the City of Victoria was endorsed.
1
Prepared by: ue Wheeler
Community Services Director
Approved by: David Boag
Acting General Manager:
Concurrence: J.L. Q ' ) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
sw/attachments
ity Development, Parks and Recreation
Page 2 of 2
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
May 12, 2010
Honourable Kevin Falcon
Minister of Health
Province of British Columbia
Ministry of Health Services
PO BOX 9050, STN PROV GOVT
Victoria, BC V8W 9E2
Dr. Perry Kendall
Provincial Health Officer
4-2 1515 Blanchard St
Victoria, BC V8W 3C8
Mr. Alan Campbell, Director
Vancouver Island Health Authority
Administration
Eric Martin Pavilion
2334 Trent Street
Victoria, BC V8R 4Z3
Honourable Michael de Jong
Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General
P. 0. Box 9053, Stn Prov Govt
Victoria, BC V8W 9E2
Dear Sirs:
RE: Letter of Support for Alcohol Reduction Strategy
This letter is written in response to the BC Coalition for Action on Alcohol Reform's request that the
District of Maple Ridge show support for the recommendations made by the Centre for Addictions
Research of BC in the Alcohol Reduction Strategy. These recommendations, intended to reduce the
public safety and health concerns associated with problematic alcohol use in our society, are as
follows:
1. Reduce the price of low alcohol content beverages and increase the price of high alcohol
content beverages;
2. Set a minimum price per standard drink, $1.50 in the liquor store and $3.00 in a bar or
restaurant. The minimum price for a bottle of wine would be $7.80; $9.00 for a six pack
of beer and $26.00 for a bottle of spirits;
3. Tax wine and beer products sold at u-vin and u-brew outlets;
4. Index the price of alcohol to inflation;
5. Implement a small levy based on standard drinks and use the proceeds to enhance
prevention, treatment and research.
At the April 19, 2010 meeting of the District of Maple Ridge Council, the following resolution was
passed:
That the Maple Ridge Social Planning Advisory Committee be authorized to write a letter in
support of the letter dated April 1, 2010 from Lembi Buchanan, Chair, BC Coalition for
Action on Alcohol Reform.
.12
11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Canada • Tel: 604-463-5221 • Fax: 604-467-7329
enquiries@mapleridge.ca • www.mapleridge.ca 10096 Recycled Paper
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
-2-
MAY 12, 2010
The District of Maple Ridge Social Planning Advisory Committee supports the BC Coalition for Action
on Alcohol Reform's request that new legislation be proposed to reduce the harms caused by alcohol
abuse in our communities.
Sincerely,
j?ayorrnie Daykin
srcof Maple Ridge
/pis
Joshua Leyenhorst
Chair, Social Planning Advisory Committee
100% Recycled Paper
BRITISH
ne l;est Place or, Earth
His Worship Ernie Daykin, Mayor, and
Joshua Leyenhorst, Chair
Social Planning Advisory Committee
District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Pi
Maple Ridge BC V2X 6A9
Dear Mayor Daykin and Mr. Leyenhorst:
Action. t-
Ref: 165103
The Honourable Mike de Jong, Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General,
has asked me to respond to your May 12, 2010, letter regarding your support
for the BC Coalition for Action on Alcohol Reform's recommendations.
Liquor prices in British Columbia retail stores are similar to prices in other provinces.
While I appreciate the recommendations made by the Centre for Addictions Research
of BC, it would not be appropriate for government to unnecessarily regulate retail
alcohol pricing as they suggest. Instead, the province deals with specific issues
and concerns related to alcohol pricing as needed.
Thank you for your comments. They will be considered when the province next
reviews its liquor pricing policies.
S'in�erely yours,
O,
j.7
•'
If
Rich Coleman
Minister
pc: Honourable Mike de Jong
Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General
Ministry of Office of the Mailing, Address: Location:
Housing and Minister Parliament Buildings Parliament Buildings, Victoria
Social Development Victoria BC VSV IX4
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
October 27, 2010
Rich Coleman, MLA
Fort Langley - Aldergrove
#130-7888 200th Street,
Langley, BC
V2Y 3J4
Dear Honourable Rich Coleman,
Thank you for taking the time as Minister of Social Development and Housing to respond to our
letter dated May 12, 2010 in which you acknowledged the concerns of our Council and our
Social Planning Advisory Committee regarding liquor pricing in British Columbia. In your
response, you stated, "While I appreciate the recommendations made by the Centre for
Addictions Research of BC, it would not be appropriate for government to unnecessarily regulate
retail alcohol pricing as they suggest. Instead, the province deals with specific issues and
concerns related to alcohol pricing as needed."
Members of our Council appreciated the opportunity to further share our concerns with you
during our session of the cabinet panel meetings at the UBCM convention. Your strong
commitment to this province is evident in your work and your thorough understanding of our
challenges and opportunities.
At the convention, the assembly of UBCM unanimously supported the resolution put forward by
the City of Victoria for the "development of a provincial alcohol reduction strategy that may
include some or all of the recommendations made by CARBC and Dr. Perry Kendall to reduce the
public safety and health concerns associated with problematic alcohol use in our society." We
believe that these reforms deserve government attention.
As Minister of Public Safety, we are hoping that you can appreciate the concerns of
municipalities across the province as we struggle to cover increased policing costs associated
with alcohol abuse. Evidence exists that incidents of public intoxication have been reduced
significantly when specific price policies were enacted, such as in Saskatchewan and Australia.
Our municipalities and the province as a whole will benefit from measures that will help reduce
incidences of domestic abuse, violent assaults, property damage, homicide and suicide
associated with alcohol abuse.
Further, it does not make sense to create public policy designed to react to the outcomes of
alcohol consumption —the .05 BAC driving restriction —yet not support a policy that would help
reduce alcohol -related harms. The CARBC initiatives would provide this missing piece,
specifically the reverse alcohol pricing, as it clearly supports the new legislation.
District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Canada • Tel: 604-463-5221 • Fax: 604-467-7329
enquiries@mapleridge.ca • www.mapleridge.ca 100%Recycled Paper
- 2-
Also, affordable lower -content alcohol products offer more options to those who want to have a
drink in a social setting and still be under the legal limit to drive.
Supporting CARBC's initiatives is a researched -based, prevention -based foundation that would
move us in the right direction to help reduce alcohol -related harms. These initiatives, advocated
for by Dr. Perry Kendall and the BC Coalition for Action on Alcohol Reform
(www.nickeladrink.com) are long overdue to assist communities in managing the social issues
and costs caused by alcohol abuse.
In closing, Minister Coleman, we respectfully ask that you honour the request of the
municipalities to adopt the initiatives recommended by CARBC to minimize harm and promote
public safety in our province. We all have the same interests at heart in that we want our
province to prosper both socially and financially. There is nothing to lose, but much to gain in
working together.
Yours truly,
Ernie Daykin, Mayor Joshua Leyenhorst, Chair
District of Maple Ridge Social Planning Advisory Committee
/tc
cc: Sue Wheeler, Director of Community Services
Social Planning Advisory Committee
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
October 27, 2010
Dear Mayor and Council:
It was a pleasure to work with all of you at our recent UBCM convention. Much debate and
positive interactions afforded clear direction to our own association and other levels of
government and we hope that much will be achieved through such decisions as we move
fo rwa rd.
The attached letter is intended as a follow up to one of the resolutions that passed
overwhelmingly by the assembly, regarding the recommendations by the Centre for Addictions
Research of BC. This resolution can be found in Section B1 of the Annual Report and
Resolutions book, page 18, resolution B14, titled, Alcohol Reduction Strategy. We hope that we
can garner your support for enacting this resolution, through your council writing a letter to
Minister Coleman advocating that the province take immediate action to heed the
recommendations contained within resolution B14, based on the CARBC research, which UBCM
endorsed.
Additionally, we request that you contact the executive of UBCM asking that they also make
advocacy of this recommendation a priority action.
For your convenience, we have attached our letter to Minister Coleman, which is a follow up to a
previous dialogue with him on this topic, and our letter to UBCM.
Thank you in advance for your support in this matter.
Yours truly,
Ernie Daykin, Mayor
District of Maple Ridge
ca/tc
Encl. Letter to Minister Rich Coleman
cc: Sue Wheeler, Director of Community Services
Social Planning Advisory Committee
District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Canada • Tel: 604-463-5221 • Fax: 604-467-7329
enquiries@mapleridge.ca • www.mapleridge.ca 100%Recycled Paper
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
October 27, 2010
Councillor Barbara Steele
525 Government Street
Victoria, BC V8V OA8
Dear UBCM Executive:
Thank you for your continued support to all of the municipalities of BC and congratulations to
those of you who have just embarked on this work on our behalf; it is greatly appreciated.
As one of your first orders of business, we respectfully request that you make section B1, of the
Annual Report and Resolutions book, page 18, resolution B14, titled, Alcohol Reduction Strategy,
a priority of the executive. Our municipality was very pleased the resolution was overwhelmingly
supported by the assembly, as we view it as a means to reduce some of the associated policing
costs, as well as other associated costs, municipalities' encounter while dealing with the impacts
of alcohol abuse. Further, the research contained in CARBC shows health care costs will also be
positively impacted by the recommendations they have put forward for provincial consideration,
which is a further benefit to our citizens.
For your convenience, we have attached a recent letter to Minister Coleman that our council sent
in regards to the adoption of resolution B14 by UBCM.
We have also advocated to our fellow councils to support our request and we look to you to be
leaders in this regard.
Thank you once again and we look forward to your response.
Yours truly,
Ernie Daykin, Mayor
District of Maple Ridge
ca/tc
Encl. Letter to Minister Rich Coleman
cc: Sue Wheeler, Director of Community Services
Social Planning Advisory Committee
District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Canada • Tel: 604-463-5221 • Fax: 604-467-7329
enquiries@mapleridge.ca • www.mapleridge.ca 100%Recycled Paper
MAPLE
Srmsh
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
FROM
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE: November 10, 2010
FILE NO:
ATTN: Workshop
Response to FCM Quality of Life Report: Mending the Frayed Social Safety Net
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Federation of Canadian Municipalities Quality of Life Reporting System, "Mending Canada's
Frayed Social Safety Net: The Role of Municipal Governments" report focuses on the growing
municipal role in filling the gaps in Canada's frayed social safety net. It examines the growing need
for municipal social services, a need made greater by the recent recession and the federal and
provincial retreat from the provision of traditional social supports.
Acknowledging the significance of the information contained within this report, the Social Planning
Advisory Committee (SPAC) forwarded this report to Council for information. At the August 30, 2010
Workshop, Council received a staff report (attached) summarizing the FCM report. Council referred
the report to SPAC for response.
At SPAC's November 3, 2010 meeting a motion was passed to forward the attached letter addressed
to FCM, to Council for approval. The letter is intended to be jointly signed by the Mayor and SPAC
Chair.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the letter addressed to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, attached to staff report
dated November 10, 2010, be endorsed and jointly signed by the Mayor and the Chair of the Social
Planning Advisory Committee.
Prepares! W.' Sue Wheeler
Community Services Director
Approved by: avid Boag
Acting General Maipager: C n�uNty Development, Parks, and Recreation
Concurrence: J.L. (�im) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
sw/attachments /
Page 1 of 1
4m5
Deep Roots
Greater Heights
October 5, 2010
Hans Cunningham, President
Federation of Canadian Municipalities
24 Clarence Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 5P3
Dear Mr. Cunningham:
The District of Maple Ridge Social Planning Advisory Committee has been directed by Mayor and Council to
acknowledge the research and advocacy work of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. As the voice of
Canadian municipalities, the Federation has aptly expressed the challenges facing municipalities into the
twenty first century. The FCM's emphasis on research has provided municipalities with a tool to plan for and
accommodate a changing and dynamic world. In particular, The Quality of Life Reports have provided a
breadth of research that supports municipalities to plan for present and future citizens.
The latest report, "Mending Canada's Frayed Social Safety Net: The role of municipal governments" provides a
definition for the new role of municipal government in the delivery of social services. The report outlines the
growing need for municipal social services made more urgent by the recent recession and the federal and
provincial governments retreat from the delivery of traditional social services. The report also introduces the
concept of social infrastructure. Municipalities have played a strong role in developing the physical
infrastructure of communities and as the report suggests, they are now tasked with developing and delivering
social infrastructure.
As a municipality, the District of Maple Ridge is experiencing similar issues as those faced by QOLRS
communities. There is an increased demand for social services from a population whose need continues to
grow. Increased levels of poverty and food insecurity and a lack of affordable housing combined with the
erosion of traditional social policy tools has left municipalities providing an unprecedented level of service to
its most vulnerable citizens.
In the province of British Columbia, the decreased level of both federal and provincial government services
and the lack of adequate resources are completely unacceptable. Municipal governments are not able to
meet the current and growing demands placed on them. This province continues to have the highest child
poverty rate in Canada as well as some of the highest rates of homelessness and food bank usage.
Municipalities continue to bear the brunt of social ills like poverty, homelessness and food insecurity.
Addressing these issues requires a commitment for a consistent and sustainable investment at all levels of
government aimed at increasing resources and providing an adequate or enhanced provision of service for all
citizens.
District of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Canada • Tel: 604-463-5221 • Fax: 604-467-7329
enquiries@mapleridge.ca • www.mapleridge.ca 100%Recycled Paper
2
The District of Maple Ridge's Social Planning Advisory Committee will continue to use the research provided by
the Federation of Canadian Municipalities to plan and advocate for our citizens. The Committee supports and
acknowledges the advocacy work of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.
Yours truly,
Mayor Ernie Daykin Josh Leyenhorst, Chair
District of Maple Ridge District of Maple Ridge Social Planning Advisory Committee
10090 Recycled Paper
Ueep Roots
Greater Heights
TO:
SUBJECT:
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE: August 25, 2010
FILE NO:
ATTN: Workshop
Social Safety Net Report Summary from FCM Quality of Life Theme Report #6:
Mending Canada's Social Safety Net: The role of Municipal Governments.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The sixth themed report from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities Quality of Life Reporting
System, "Mending Canada's Frayed Social Safety Net: The Role of Municipal Governments", focuses
on the growing municipal role in filling the gaps in Canada's frayed social safety net. It examines the
growing need for municipal social services, a need made greater by the recent recession and the
federal and provincial retreat from the provision of traditional social supports.
The report also introduces the concept of "social infrastructure"; the support system provided by
municipal governments. The report concludes that the.withdrawal of federal and provincial support
for social programs and the lack of commitment to sustained funding have forced a growing number
of people, particularly people living on limited incomes, onto services supported by the
municipalities. Should this "second line of defense" that municipalities are providing fail,
consequences for the vulnerable populations will be severe.
The Social Planning Advisory Committee, in its role of examining issues that impact quality of life for
the current and future citizens, has reviewed this report. Acknowledging the significance of the
information contained within this report, the Committee passed a resolution to forward this report to
Council for information.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That the staff report summarizing the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' "Quality of Life in
Canadian Municipalities Mending Canada's Frayed Social Safety Net: The Role of Municipal
Governments" Report be accepted as information.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) has been the national voice of municipalities since
1901. With more than 1,775 members, FCM represents the interests of municipalities on policy and
program matters that fall within federal jurisdiction. Through FCM, municipal governments have
maintained a strong advocacy role in lobbying the federal government to include municipal concerns
in policy development and national decision -making.
Led by FCM, the Quality of Life Reporting System (QOLRS) measures, monitors and reports on social,
economic and environmental trends in Canada's largest cities and communities. Within British
Columbia, Surrey and Vancouver are members of the Quality Of Life communities. By providing
Page 1 of 3
evidence of important trends taking place across the municipal sector, the QOLRS helps to ensure
that municipal government is a strong partner in formulating public policy in Canada. Relying on
data from a variety of sources, the QOLRS contains hundreds of variables that measure changes in
10 domains. The reporting system is also used to publish thematic reports, which examine specific
local trends. Taken together, these trends form issues of national importance.
The sixth report in FCM's Quality of Life Reporting System series: "Mending Canada's Frayed Social
Safety Net: The Role of Municipal Governments" was published in March of this year. The report
findings are consistent with other QOLRS reports showing that poverty and other inequalities persist
among vulnerable groups in these communities. The report looks at the growing need for municipal
social services, a need made more urgent by the recent recession and the federal and provincial
retreat from traditional social support, which has shifted the burden to municipal governments.
The array of social infrastructure available within Canadian cities represents an impressive and
important part of the services that contribute to quality of life. The report introduces the concept of
"social infrastructure" describing it as the support system provided by municipal governments and
made up of direct social services, such as affordable housing, emergency shelters and subsidized
childcare, as well as public services like transit, reaction and libraries. Together these municipal
services help fill the gap left by shrinking federal and provincial social assistance programs. They
form the social infrastructure that a growing number of people rely on to earn a living, raise their
families, and cope with difficult times. Social infrastructure is particularly important to vulnerable
people on limited incomes, especially during a recession. The report finds that while the need for
these services has increased, investments have not kept up.
The report identifies growing dynamic in which poverty, combined with the shrinking federal and
provincial support for social services, has increased demands on limited municipal resources. This
has created an urban environment where substantial numbers of people are disadvantaged. The
following trends contributing to this dynamic are highlighted in the report:
• The persistence of poverty despite economic growth - while certain populations experienced
relative improvements in their social -economic situation, others (ie single mothers and
families with young children, the working poor, immigrants, and social assistance recipients)
were left even further behind;
• The erosion of traditional social -policy tools to combat poverty and unemployment - the
report demonstrates that the decline in federal social programs together with provincial
downloading of social -services costs and responsibilities to municipalities has weakened the
municipal social infrastructure;
• The fraying social safety net - the report indicates that the recent recession, combined with
more restrictive El rules and ineligibility for social assistance has contributed to increases in
the number of working poor and in the incidence of homelessness.
• The municipal role in patching the social safety net - the report highlights a range of social
infrastructure with strong municipal involvement including social housing, emergency
shelters, public transit, childcare, recreation, and libraries. Together, these facilities,
programs and services help fill the gaps left by the shrinking federal and provincial social
assistance.
• The looming deficit in municipal social infrastructure - the report demonstrated that cities
have stepped in to fill the holes in the social safety net as federal and provincial
governments retreat from funding social programs. It concludes that despite municipal
efforts, long waiting lists for services, increasing homelessness and a growing number of
working -poor families suggest demand is outpacingthe municipal capacity to respond.
Page 2of3
The report concludes that the withdrawal of federal and provincial support for social programs and
the lack of a commitment to sustained funding have forced a growing number of people, particularly
people living on limited incomes, onto services supported by the municipalities. FCM indicates that
the report supports their call for continued federal contributions to cities in the form of the GST
Refund, the permanent Gas Tax Refund and various infrastructure programs now in place. The
report indicates that there is a clear human cost of allowing the social safety net to fray. Although
municipal social infrastructure has provided a second line of defense for an increasing number of
people that are slipping through the traditional safety net, should municipal resources fail; the
consequences for Canada's most vulnerable will be severe.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Federation of Canadian Municipalities Quality of Life Theme report #6 entitled, "Mending
Canada's Fraying Social Safety Net: The role of Municipal Governments" includes some valuable
information about the impact of the provincial and federal retreat from traditional social services on
Municipal governments. The District of Maple Ridge Social Planning Advisory Committee has
forwarded this report to Council for information.
Prepared by: �Suq N he erg t' 1
Communi ervices Director
Approved by: Xky s4vift `
GenerAl Maa (,Community Development, Parks and Recreation
Concurrence: J.L.itJim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
sw/attachments
Page 3 of 3
MAPLE RItiGE
grit Esh CvtumbiaDeep Roots
1103.
FROM
SUBJECT
District of Maple Ridge
His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin
and Members of Council
Chief Administrative Officer
DATE: November 9, 2010
ATTN: Council Workshop
Town Centre Investment Incentives Program - Implementation Schedule
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the November 1, 2010 Council Workshop Meeting, Council endorsed the Town Centre Investment
Incentives Program. As Council is aware, as part of the Our Spirit Our Town initiative, the District has
made significant investments in the Town Centre over the last several years, in keeping with
Council's vision to create a vibrant, robust and dynamic Town Centre. The program is intended to
encourage accelerated private sector investment in residential and commercial projects in the Town
Centre to help achieve Council's vision. The purpose of this report is to outline the implementation
schedule for Council approval.
RECOMMENDATIONS
That Council endorse the Town Centre Investment Incentives Program Implementation
Schedule identified in the staff report dated November 9, 2010 and further;
That staff bring forward the first set of enabling bylaws to the Council Meeting on November
23, 2010.
DISCUSSION
Municipal Council recognizes the important role that the private sector plays in providing citizens
with a diverse and affordable housing stock that protects their quality of life, and in creating a strong
local economy that offers employment opportunities for our citizens. The Town Centre Investment
Incentives Program proposed in a staff report dated October 28, 2010 is a result of Council
direction, and demonstrates Council's commitment to strengthening the investment climate in the
Maple Ridge Town Centre. The program builds on the numerous initiatives, plans and capital
projects the municipality has invested in over the past several years. The incentive program is aimed
at achieving development in the Town Centre to fully realize the vision for the heart of the
community.
This report discusses a proposed implementation schedule for the various regulations required to
enable the incentive program. Schedules A and B attached to this report outline the incentive areas
and incentives endorsed by Council at the workshop on November 1, 2010.
Page 1 of 5 4,6
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
The regulations required to implement the Town Centre Investment Incentives Program range in
complexity and timelines. The following schedule is proposed, recognizing that the program is a high
priority of Council, while still respecting current workplans.
Incentive Tool I Date of bylaw or resolution to Effective date of
Council on proposed changes changes
Building Height Flexibility
Comprehensive Development Guidelines
Brownfield Development Support
Priority Processing
Building Permit Fee reduction
Development Fee rebate
Reduced Parking - Boundary Extension
Faqade Improvement Program (BIA
program funding)
Property Tax Exemptions
Development Cost Charge reduction
Reduced Parking - Car -share/ options
No change required
In place
No change required
In place
No change required
In progress; dependent
on Province and FCM
November 23, 2010 - Resolution
January 10, 2010
November 23, 2010 and December 14,
January 10, 2011
2010 - Bylaw
November 23, 2010 and December 14,
January 10, 2011
2010 - Bylaw
November 23, 2010 and December 14,
January 10, 2011
2010 - Bylaw
December 2010 - Financial Plan Bylaw March 1, 2011
Mid -February 2011- Bylaw March 1, 2011
Mid -February 2011- TBA March 1, 2011
Spring 2011- Bylaw March 1, 2011
A training program will be developed to ensure all staff involved in the development process are fully
informed about the incentive program, criteria, and priority processing requirements.
DESIRED OUTCOME
This program is intended to prompt the following outcomes:
• encourage residential and commercial investment in the Town Centre;
• send a message to the investment community that Maple Ridge strongly supports the
development of the Town Centre;
• provide a basis for marketing and communication material that can be promoted through a
variety of means to raise the profile of investment opportunities in Maple Ridge.
Page 2of5
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
The District of Maple Ridge Corporate Strategic Plan and the Strategic Economic Initiatives Strategic
Plan share a common vision for a strong and vibrant local economy, and a commitment to
environmental stewardship. This incentive program is intended to provide long-term economic,
social and environmental benefits to the District that more than compensate for the initial financial
implications.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
Staff training to ensure an informed and consistent application of the program will be developed and
implemented.
CONCLUSION
Council has a desire to build on the momentum of development and enhancements that have
already occurred in the Town Centre, and provide local employment opportunities. An incentive
program is being proposed to attract investment to the Town Centre. While there is a financial
impact of this program, longer term economic benefits are expected to offset any forgone revenue.
Staff is recommending that Council endorse the Town Centre Investment Implementation Schedule
outlined in this report. At the November 15, 2010 workshop, staff will provide a brief slide
presentation outlining the program.
�f—
Prepared -by: ' aura Benson, CMA
Manager, Sustainability and Corporate Planning
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng.
General Manager: Public Works and Development Services
a r—N. &
Approved b : Pa Gill, BBA, CGA
General Manager: Corporate -and Financial Services
� J
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Office
Page 3 of 5
■
;�f111ulnsllllnr RL_"••.7+� �•1111
11
go
t�l iRlil�r!!.■ — r.
It
■.a.rss..memo
r.:::: �IIIIIIII : = f
ffrr.11 �_ �� ■
llrfl.11lll.l..�ia��ai����� •
�
m rEl I500 �� !11lllllll =�
Elm
�r4r �iJi .1.lii.l{1{i.AMlMlllllirlrSs �_— _Ilil#,.��
1111H111111 --0 111 i1 11,°
�1>>■ IIrI1�11L ����11��
lilt� _I1111: Mtf■= llisiln-
ulrr= !rl11lla 1E �!IlI::`ll�
t1i�.1�1'�R�I'11 A
� �1i III k rr! ��� I • ���� ��i�ll w��l
_ � r
MAPLE R109t
0,
r1�!
ii i L >. Mal
SCHEDULE B - PROPOSED TOWN CENTRE INVESTMENT INCENTIVES MATRIX
Residential
Commercial
Site
F'a(;ade
Preparation
Improvements
Criteria s
New
New
Renovations: On Council
Renovations to
Building permit
Construction:
Construction.struetion;
>$20,000
approval
fiagade
must be issued by
5 storeys and
4 storeys an
Lew
,000,000
?$10,000
Monday, December
30, 2013
higher
higher
AWWAI
See Map on
Sub -area 2
Sub-areal"Tub-areas
Su are
Sub -areas
Sub -areas
Schedule A
1 and 2
1
1 and 2
1 and 2
Incentive Package 2
Priority Processing
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Development Cost
Reduced rate
Reduced
Reduced
n/a
n/a
n/a
Charges
rate
rate
Reductions 3
Property Tax
3 years
3 years
3 years
3 years (on
3 years
3 years (on
Exemptions 4
renovation
renovation
portion)
portion)
Additional Property
Additional
Additional
Additional
Additional
n/a
n/a
Tax Exemption
3 years
3 years
3 years
3 years
(LEED-Silver or
renewable energy)
50% Building
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Permit Fees
50% Development
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Application Fees
Reduced Parking
n/a
Yes
Sub -area 1
n/a
n/a
n/a
Standards
only
Brownfield Support
Yes
Yes
Yes
n/a
Yes
n/a
- potential grants
Building Height
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
n/a
n/a
Flexibility
Comprehensive
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
n/a
Yes 5
Development
Guidelines
Fagade
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
$75,000
Improvement
over 3 years
Progra m
1 - Must also comply with all land use regulations, and may
have to be supported by development variance applications
2 - See full report for details
3 - Requires public process and Provincial
approval
4 - Property tax exemption on general municipal
portion only
5 - Development permit required for alterations >_$25,000 if
not consistent
with DP guidelines
Page 5 of 5
MEMO
October 26, 2010
TO: Council & Boards
FROM: Councillor Barbara Steele, UBCM President
RE: OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE
ULTIMATE LIMITATION PERIOD
The Ministry of Attorney General has issued a
White Paper on Limitation Act Reform which is
accessible online at:
.www.ag.,o,ov.bc.ca/legislation/index.htm
The White Paper is inviting comment on
proposed reforms to the Limitation Act. The
Paper responds to the policy topics raised in
public consultations held in 2007 (Green Paper
on Reforming BC's Limitation Act) and provides
a forum for further discussion on the proposed
reforms. In addition to the White Paper, there is
a consultation draft of a proposed Limitation Act.
The Limitation Act sets out the time periods
people have to start a proceeding to sue one
another in the civil justice system. While many
other laws set limitation periods, the Limitation
Act sets the default regime. Unless another law
sets the applicable limitation period, the
Limitation Act applies.
As members know this is an issue of long
standing concern for local governments. UBCM
has been advocating the reduction of the
ultimate limitation period from 30 years to 10
years. Members have consistently endorsed
resolutions that have sought this reduction (see
attachment). This position is consistent with:
• 1990 BC Law Reform Commission paper on
the ultimate limitation period;
• 2002 BC Law Institute paper on the same
topic; and
• many other developments in Canada.
Some of the key changes recommended in this
White Paper of specific interest to local
governments include:
• moving to a single ultimate limitation period of
either 10 or 15 years; and
• moving to a single two-year basic limitation
period for all civil claims.
UBCM is in the process of preparing a response
to the White Paper jointly with MIA BC, but
would encourage members to respond
individually in support of the proposed direction
within the White Paper.
Comments can be mailed, faxed or emailed to:
Civil Policy and Legislation Office
Justice Services Branch
Ministry of Attorney General
PO Box 9222 Stn Prov Govt
Victoria, B.C. V8W 9J1
Facsimile: 250 387-4525
Email: CPLO Limitation@gov.bc.ca
Consultations will be open until
November 15, 2010.
Please copy UBCM on your submissions.
I urge you to take advantage of this opportunity
to affect a significant aspect of local government
liability exposure.
w%v.uhcm.ca
511
Attachment
CURRENT ENDORSED UBCM POLICY ON THIS MATTER
2009 - B56 LIMITATION ON MUNICIPAL LIABILITY REGARDING BUILDING
PERMITS & INSPECTIONS
WHEREAS all local governments, with the exception of the City of Vancouver, face considerable liability risk and
are being financially penalized as a result of legislation which does not provide immunity for building permit and
inspection processes;
AND WHEREAS it is unacceptable that all local governments in British Columbia are not afforded the same
liability protection through provincial legislation:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of BC Municipalities recommend to the provincial government
that the Local Government Act be amended to abolish the system of joint and several liability and replace it with
proportionate liability, under which defendants are responsible only to the degree to which they contributed to the
loss and that the Province reduce the limitation period from 30 years to 10 years.
2007 — B1 ULTIMATE LIMITATION PERIOD
WHEREAS the Ministry of Attorney General is undertaking a review of limitation periods;
AND WHEREAS the UBCM Convention and two law reform commissions have recommended a reduction in the
ultimate limitation period:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of BC Municipalities support a reduction in the ultimate
limitation period from 30 years to 10 years
2006 — Al LIABILITY LIMITATION PERIODS AND MANDATORY INSURANCE
WHEREAS joint and several liability can have a devastating financial impact on local governments;
AND WHEREAS local governments have no way of mitigating their chances of a joint and several liability
occurrence happening:
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of BC Municipalities petition the provincial government to
reduce the ultimate limitation period from 30 years to 10 years;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the provincial government require all participants in the building
system to have insurance.
www.ubcm.ca