HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-12-11 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfPage 1
City of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
December 11, 2018
7:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
Note: This Agenda is also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws
or resolutions. This is the venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or
resolution.
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
400 ADOPTION OF MINUTES
401 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of November 27, 2018
402 Minutes to the Public Hearing of December 4, 2018
500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
600 DELEGATIONS
601 Presentation of the ESRI Canada Award of Excellence
C. Crabtree, Chief Information Officer
MEETING DECORUM
Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are
decided at Council meetings which affect many people’s lives. Therefore, we ask that
you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary
and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council
Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person’s beh avior will be
reprimanded. The meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge.
Council Meeting Agenda
December 11, 2018
Council Chamber
Page 2 of 9
650 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Note: Questions from the Public are limited to 15 minutes unless extended
by a motion approved by the majority of Council. Each speaker is limited to
2 minutes at a time.
700 ITEMS ON CONSENT
701 Minutes
701.1 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of
November 26, December 4 and December 6, 2018
701.2 Minutes of Meetings of Committees and Commissions of Council
Agricultural Advisory Committee – October 25, 2018
Public Art Steering Committee – September 25, 2018
702 Reports
702.1 Disbursements for the month ended November 30, 2018
Staff report dated December 11, 2018 providing information on the
disbursements for the month ended November 30, 2018.
703 Correspondence
704 Release of Items from Closed Council Status
From the Closed Council Meeting of January 9, 2017
Item 04.03 Albion Neighbourhood Learning and Community Centre Design
Process
Council Meeting Agenda
December 11, 2018
Council Chamber
Page 3 of 9
800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Items 801 to 802 have been forwarded from the December 4, 2018
Council Workshop Meeting
801 2020 BC Summer Games Nomination Committee
Staff report dated December 11, 2018 recommending that staff proceed
with forming the 2020 BC Summer Games Nomination Committee, that
various agencies and organizations be invited to participate and that the
Mayor, the General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture and the Manager
Health & Wellness of the City of Maple Ridge sit on the nomination
committee.
802 Maple Ridge Youth Planning Table Terms of Reference
Staff report dated December 11, 2018 recommending that the terms of
reference for the Maple Ridge Youth Planning Table be endorsed and that a
draft implementation schedule for the Maple Ridge Youth Strategy be
provided.
803 Motion by Councillor Robson
“That a letter be sent to the Provincial Government expressing Maple Ridge
Council’s support for the immediate permitting of ride-share services such
as UBER.”
900 CORRESPONDENCE
901 InnerVisions Recovery Society – Support for Proposal
E-mail correspondence dated November 23, 2018 from Joanna Schofield,
Director, InnerVision Recovery Society, requesting the Mayor’s support on a
proposal to help clean and sober individuals gain employment skills and
work experience in the cooking and food service industries.
Recommendation: That a letter of response in support of the proposal be
prepared by Mayor Morden.
Council Meeting Agenda
December 11, 2018
Council Chamber
Page 4 of 9
1000 BYLAWS
Note: Item 1001 is from the December 11, 2018 Council Workshop Meeting
Bylaw for First, Second and Third Readings
1001 Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: Consultation Summary Report
Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7489-
2018
To integrate electric vehicle charging stations into new developments
First, second and third readings
Note: Items 1002 to 1003 are from the December 4, 2018 Public Hearing
Bylaws for Third Reading
1002 2017-580-RZ, 22866 128 Avenue
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7421-2018
To rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) to R-1 (Residential District). The minimum lot size for the
current RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone is 0.4 ha (1 acre),
and the minimum lot size for the proposed R-1 (Residential District) zone is
371 m2 (3,994 ft²). The current application is to permit a future
subdivision into approximately seven single family residential lots.
Third reading
1003 2018-332-RZ, 11641 227 Street
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7509-2018
An OCP amendment is required to add the subject property into Appendix D
– Temporary Use Permits of the OCP. The current application is to allow a
sales centre for a future apartment use.
Third reading
1100 COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting
with the recommendations being brought to this meeting for City Council
consideration and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to
the public and is held in the Council Chamber a week prior to this meeting.
Council Meeting Agenda
December 11, 2018
Council Chamber
Page 5 of 9
Public Works and Development Services
1101 2016-411-RZ, 21188 Wicklund Avenue, RS-1 to R-4
Staff report dated December 4, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7505-2018 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family
Urban Residential) to R-4 (Single Detached [Infill] Urban Residential) to
permit subdivision into two single family homes be given first reading and
that the applicant provide further information as described in Schedule B of
the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the
information required for a Subdivision application.
1102 2017-432-RZ, 20234 Lorne Avenue, RS-1 to RT-2
Staff report dated December 4, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7398-2017 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family
Urban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to allow for future
development of approximately five townhouse units be rescinded and that
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 7518-2018 to rezone from RS-1 (One
Family Urban Residential) to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) to
allow for a fourplex development be given first reading and that the
applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D and E
of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
1103 2018-381-RZ, 20873 123 Avenue, A-2 to R-1
Staff report dated December 4, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7508-2018 to rezone from A-2 (Upland
Agricultural) to R-1 (Residential District) to permit a two lot subdivision be
given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as
described on Schedules B and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No.
5879-1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision
application.
1104 2018-430-RZ, 23717 and 23689 Fern Crescent, RS-2 to RM-1
Staff report dated December 4, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7520-2018 to rezone from RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit future
development of approximately 33 townhouse units be given first reading
and that the applicant provide further information as described on
Schedules A, C, D, E, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No.
5879-1999, along with the information required for an Intensive
Residential Development Permit and a Subdivision application.
Council Meeting Agenda
December 11, 2018
Council Chamber
Page 6 of 9
1105 2018-444-RZ, 21759 River Road, RS-1 to RS-1b
Staff report dated December 4, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7516-2018 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family
Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density]
Residential) to permit future subdivision into two lots be given first reading
and that the applicant provide further information as described on
Schedules B and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999,
along with the information required for a Subdivision application.
1106 2018-458-RZ, 11310 Kingston Street, RS-3 to M-3
Staff report dated December 4, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7522-2018 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family
Rural Residential) to M-3 (Business Park) to permit the creation of a
campus style business park with 7 buildings, habitat restoration and trail
development be given first reading and that the applicant provide further
information as described on Schedules C, D, E and F of the Development
Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
1107 Latecomer Agreement LC 162/18, 24086 and 24108 104 Avenue
Staff report dated December 4, 2018 recommending that the cost to
provide excess or extended services excessive to the municipality be paid
by the owners of 24086 and 24108 104 Avenue, that Latecomer Charges
be imposed and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal
Latecomer Agreement LC 162/18.
1108 Latecomer Agreement LC 163/18, 13660, 13702 and 13738 232 Street
Staff report dated December 4, 2018 recommending that the cost to
provide excess or extended services excessive to the municipality be paid
by the owners of 13660, 13702 and 13738 232 Street, that Latecomer
Charges be imposed and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign
and seal Latecomer Agreement LC 163/18.
1109 Award of Contract ITT-EN18-78: North Lane Sanitary Sewer Replacement by
Pipe Bursting
Staff report dated December 4, 2018 recommending that Contract ITT-
EN18-78: North Lane Sanitary Sewer Replacement by Pipe Bursting be
awarded to PW Trenchless Construction Inc., that a contingency be
approved to address potential variations in field conditions and that the
Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
Council Meeting Agenda
December 11, 2018
Council Chamber
Page 7 of 9
Corporate Services
1131
Parks, Recreation & Culture
1151
Administration (including Fire and Police)
1171
Other Committee Issues
1191
1200 STAFF REPORTS
1201 2018-202-DVP, 2018-201-DP, 11718 224 Street
Staff report dated December 11, 2018 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-202-DVP to reduce front yard
and rear yard setback, to reduce the north and south side interior side yard
setback, to increase the maximum number of storeys and building height
and to increase the maximum retaining wall height and that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-201-DP to permit future
construction of a five storey residential apartment building with 23
residential units.
1202 2018-490-DVP, 10607 277 Street
Staff report dated December 11, 2018 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-490-DVP to increase maximum
building height of a detached garden suite in the RS-3 zone.
1203 Award of Contract, Civil Works for the Maple Ridge Cemetery Expansion
Staff report dated December 11, 2018 recommending that Contract ITT-
PL18-75: Maple Ridge Cemetery Civil Works be awarded to Custom
Blacktop Co., that a contingency be authorized and that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
Council Meeting Agenda
December 11, 2018
Council Chamber
Page 8 of 9
1204 Award of Contract: Janitorial Services
Staff report dated December 11, 2018 recommending that RFP-PL18-67
for Janitorial Services be awarded to Hallmark Facility Services Inc. for a
two-year period with options to renew for three additional one-year terms,
that the Facilities Operations annual budget be increased to accommodate
additional organic collection and recycling service resulting from the award
of contract and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the
contract.
1205 Albion Community Centre Costing and Grant Opportunity
Staff report dated December 11, 2018 recommending that site
development tendering of the Albion Community Centre project proceed so
that major site and earth works can be completed in conjunction with the
development of the c̓əsqənelə Elementary School project, that construction
of the Albion Community Centre be delayed to qualify for a Community,
Culture and Recreation grant, that an application to the Community, Culture
and Recreation Program for funding towards construction of the Albion
Community Centre be submitted, that necessary measures to obtain a
LEED Silver designation or equivalent be included in the design of the
centre and that the next Financial Plan Bylaw be amended as described in
the December 11, 2018 report.
1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
1400 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING
1500 MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS’ REPORTS
Council Meeting Agenda
December 11, 2018
Council Chamber
Page 9 of 9
1600 ADJOURNMENT
Checked by:________________ Date: ________________
QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
The purpose of the Questions from the Public session is to provide the public with
an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them,
with the exception of Public Hearing bylaws which have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium).
Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual
members of Council. The total session is limited to 15 minutes.
Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the
information required to provide a complete and accurate response.
Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings,
delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to
Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and
information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to
have a voice in the future of this community.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk’s Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca.
Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca.
400 Adoption and Receipt of Minutes
400
401 Minutes of Regular and Special Council Meetings
401
City of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 27, 2018
The Minutes of the City Council Meeting held on November 27, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. in
the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British
Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business.
PRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Mayor M. Morden P. Gill, Chief Administrative Officer
Councillor J. Dueck K. Swift, General Manager of Parks, Recreation & Culture
Councillor K. Duncan F. Quinn, General Manager Public Works and Development
Councillor C. Meadus Services
Councillor G. Robson L. Benson, Director of Corporate Administration
Councillor R. Svendsen T. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
Councillor A. Yousef C. Carter, Director of Planning
A. Gaunt, Confidential Secretary
Other staff as required
C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental
Services
D. Pollock, Municipal Engineer
B. Elliott, Manager of Community Services
Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
The meeting was live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
Withdrawal of Item 1109 Ridge Brewing Company Ltd. – Brewery
Lounge Endorsement
Addition of Section 1500 Mayor and Councillors’ Reports with
following agenda items numbered consecutively
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 2 of 15
300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
R/2018-612
It was moved and seconded
That the agenda for the November 27, 2018 Council Meeting be amended
with the withdrawal of Item 1109 Ridge Brewing Company Ltd. – Brewery
Lounge Endorsement and the addition of Section 1500 Mayor and
Councillors’ Reports and further
That the agenda be approved as amended.
CARRIED
400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
401 Minutes of the Special Council Meeting of November 13, 2018 and the
Regular Council Meeting of November 13, 2018
R/2018-613
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Special Council Meeting of November 13, 2018
and the Regular Council Meeting of November 13 , 2018 be adopted as
circulated.
CARRIED
500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL – Nil
600 DELEGATIONS
601 Kanaka Education and Environmental Partnership Society (KEEPS)
Michael Buckingham, Chair
Ross Davies, Program Interpreter
Mr. Buckingham spoke on the Bell-Irving Hatchery and provided a history
on the facility. He advised on the recent transport of salmon to the
hatchery to get the hatching process underway and the large number of
persons visiting the hatchery operation and the benefit to the municipality.
Mr. Davis gave a PowerPoint presentation providing an introduction to
KEEPS and its partners, outlining KEEPS programs and events and
highlighting the Bell-Irving/Kanaka Creek Watershed Stewardship Centre.
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 3 of 15
602 Operation Red Nose
Kate Doucette, Volunteer Director Operation Red Nose
Nicky Tu, KidSport, Coordinator Operation Red Nose
Kate Woochuk, Road Safety Coordinator, ICBC
Ms. Doucette gave a PowerPoint presentation providing an overview of
Operation Red Nose, advised on the evenings that the service will be
running and how the operation works. She thanked Maple Ridge Towing
for providing a station for Operation Red Nose and spoke on work done by
volunteers and the positive impact of the program on the community.
Ms. Tu provided information on the KidSport organization and spoke on the
role KidSport plays as the host of the program. She highlighted the
businesses and sponsors participating to ensure the success of the
operation and outlined how the City of Maple Ridge has contributed to the
program.
Ms. Woochuk advised on her role with Operation Red Nose and encouraged
all residents to plan a safe ride home.
650 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Eric Phillips
Mr. Phillips referenced Item 1132 and asked where the cell tower referred
to in the staff report will be situated. He expressed concern that it appears
there will be two cell towers attached to the Hammond Community Centre.
The Chief Administrative Officer advised that the report refers to a renewal
of a lease and that there will not be two cell towers.
Cal Kaytor
Mr. Kaytor advised that he has received a letter stating that the Official
Community Plan for Hammond has been changed. He asked why such a
notification cannot be placed on a tax notice rather than sent out in the
manner it had been done.
The Director of Planning advised on the process of notifying residents of
changes in the area plan.
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 4 of 15
700 ITEMS ON CONSENT
701 Minutes
701.1 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meeting of November
13 and November 21, 2018.
701.2 Minutes of Committees and Commissions of Council
Advisory Design Panel – June 20, 2018 and July 18, 2018
Community Heritage Commission – October 11, 2018
Environmental Advisory Committee – September 12, 2018
Social Policy Advisory Committee – September 5, 2018
R/2018-614
It was moved and seconded
That the items on the Consent Agenda be received into the record.
CARRIED
702 Reports – Nil
703 Correspondence – Nil
704 Release of Items from Closed Council Status – Nil
800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS – Nil
900 CORRESPONDENCE – Nil
1000 BYLAWS
Bylaws for Adoption
1001 2018-200-RZ, Detached Garden Suites Pilot Project
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending adoption
1001.1 2018-200-RZ, 26378 126 Avenue
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7472-2018
To permit a Detached Garden Suite with a maximum Gross Floor Area of
140 m2 (1500 ft2) and a maximum building height of 7.5 metres from
ground level
Adopt
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 5 of 15
R/2018-615
It was moved and seconded
That Zone Amending Bylaw 7472-2018 be adopted.
CARRIED
1001.2 2018-200-RZ, 23525 Dogwood Avenue
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7473-2018
To permit a Detached Garden Suite with a maximum Gross Floor Area of
140 m2 (1500 ft2) located in the front yard
Adopt
R/2018-616
It was moved and seconded
That Zone Amending Bylaw 7473-2018 be adopted.
CARRIED
1001.3 26378 126 Avenue Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7476-2018
To authorize the City of Maple Ridge to enter into a Housing Agreement
Adopt
R/2018-617
It was moved and seconded
That Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7476-2018 be adopted.
CARRIED
1001.4 23525 Dogwood Avenue Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7477-2018
To authorize the City of Maple Ridge to enter into a Housing Agreement
Adopt
R/2018-618
It was moved and seconded
That Housing Agreement Bylaw 7477-2018 be adopted.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 6 of 15
1100 REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Public Works and Development Services
1101 2018-370-AL, 21803 128 Avenue, Non-Farm Use Application
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that Non-Farm Use
Application 2018-370-AL to construct an agricultural building exceeding the
maximum permissible dimensions for an accessory structure be forwarded
to the Agricultural Land Commission.
D. Hall, Planner gave a PowerPoint presentation providing the following
information:
Application Information
Subject Map
Official Community Plan Context
Neighbourhood Plan Context
Site Characteristics
Development Proposal
Decision Implications
Site Plan
R/2018-619
It was moved and seconded
That non-farm use application 2018-370-AL be forwarded to the
Agricultural Land Commission for their consideration.
Note: The main motion was moved and seconded. Council requested that the
applicant be asked to answer questions and provide clarification prior to
the question being called.
Victor Muir - applicant
Mr. Muir explained that the property is currently being used to grow corn.
He advised that the proposed building in the application is smaller than the
barn which was on the premises and will be used for grain equipment and
tractors along with bags for corn. He also advised that the original
structure has been torn down.
Mayor Morden called the question on the motion
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 7 of 15
1102 2018-349-RZ, 21745 River Road, RS-1 to RS-1b
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7503-2018 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family
Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density]
Residential) to permit future subdivision into two lots be given first reading
and that the applicant provide further information as described on
Schedules B, E, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-
1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application.
R/2018-620
It was moved and seconded
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7503-2018 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules
B, E, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along
with the information required for a Subdivision application.
CARRIED
1103 2018-429-RZ, 11052 240 Street, RS-3 to R-3
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7515-2018 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family
Rural Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) to permit
future subdivision into five single family lots be given first reading and that
the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B,
E, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along
with the information required for an Intensive Residential Development
Permit and a Subdivision application.
R/2018-621
It was moved and seconded
1) In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for
consultation during the development or amendment of an Official
Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is
required with specifically:
i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by
the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community
Plan;
ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area
covered by the plan;
iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area
covered by the plan;
iv. First Nations;
v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District
Boards; and
vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 8 of 15
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation
be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the
proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s website,
together with an invitation to the public to comment, and;
2) That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7515-2018 be given first reading; and
3) That the applicant provide further information as described on
Schedules A, B, E, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No.
5879–1999, along with the information required for an Intensive
Residential Development Permit and a Subdivision application.
Note: The main motion was moved and seconded. Council requested a
presentation from Planning Department staff prior to the question being
called.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a
PowerPoint presentation providing the following information:
Application Information
Subject Map
Official Community Plan Context
Neighbourhood Plan Context
Site Characteristics
Development Proposal
Proposed Site Plan
Terms and Conditions
Mayor Morden called the question on the motion
CARRIED
1104 2018-261-RZ, 21310 and 21314 124 Avenue, RS-1 to RS-1b
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7502-2018 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family
Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density]
Residential) to permit future subdivision into two single family lots be given
first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described
on Schedule B of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999,
along with the information required for a Subdivision application
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 9 of 15
R/2018-622
It was moved and seconded
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7502-2018 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B
of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the
information required for a Subdivision application.
CARRIED
1105 2017-140-RZ, 23953 Fern Crescent, RS-2 to RS-1b
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7513-2018 to revise
conservation boundaries to fit site conditions be given first and second
reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7390-2017 to rezone from RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density]
Residential) to permit a future subdivision of four single family lots be given
second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
C. Chan, Planner gave a PowerPoint presentation providing the following
information:
Application Information
Subject Map
Official Community Plan Context
Neighbourhood Plan Context
Site Characteristics
Development Proposal
Proposed Site Plan
Terms and Conditions
R/2018-623
It was moved and seconded
1) That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act,
opportunity for early and ongoing consultation has been provided by
way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7513-2018
on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to
provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding
a Public Hearing on the bylaw;
2) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7513-2018 be
considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste
Management Plan;
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 10 of 15
3) That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No.
7513-2018 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste
Management Plan;
4) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7513-2018 be given
first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
5) That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7390-2017 be given second reading,
and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
6) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i. Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule “A”, Chapter
10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley, Figure 2 - Land Use Plan, Figure 3D
- Horse Hamlet, and Figure 4 - Trails / Open Space;
ii. Road dedication on Fern Crescent and Sheldrake Court as
required;
iii. Park dedication as required along Hennipen Creek; and removal of
all debris and garbage from park land;
iv. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the protection of the
Environmentally Sensitive areas on the subject property;
v. Removal of existing building/s;
vi. Notification to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the
Ministry of Environment for in-stream works on the site as
necessary;
vii. In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be
submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any
evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject
property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to
ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site.
viii. That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $20,400
($5,100/lot) be provided in keeping with the Council Policy 6.31
with regard to Community Amenity Contributions.
CARRIED
1106 2018-409-RZ, Residential Infill Policy and Zone
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7493-2018 to permit a new
single family zone for eligible properties be given first and second reading
and be forwarded to Public Hearing, that Maple Ridge Zone Amending
Bylaw No. 7504-2018 to create the R-4 (Single Detached [Infill] Urban
Residential) zone be given first and second reading and be forwarded to
Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development
Servicing Amending Bylaw No. 7507-2018 to outline required servicing for
properties in the new R-4 zone be given first and second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing.
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 11 of 15
A. Bowden, Planner gave a PowerPoint presentation providing the following
information:
History of the development of Neighbourhood Residential Infill
designated areas
Outlined of the new R-4 zone
Site characteristics with zoning comparison to other existing zones
Staff recommendations
R/2018-624
It was moved and seconded
1. In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement
for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official
Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is
required with specifically:
a. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by
the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community
Plan.
b. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area
covered by the plan;
c. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area
covered by the plan;
d. First Nations;
e. Board of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District
Boards, and
f. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be
required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed
Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s website, together with
an invitation to the public to comment.
2. That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw 7493-2018 be given
first and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing; and
3. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7504-2018 be given first and second
reading and forwarded to Public Hearing; and
4. That Subdivision and Development Servicing Amending Bylaw No.
7507-2018 be given first and second reading and forwarded to Public
Hearing.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 12 of 15
1107 Cannabis Retail Processing and Evaluation Criteria – Council Policy 6.33
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that Council Policy
6.33 “Cannabis Retail Store Processing and Evaluation Criteria” be
adopted.
R/2018-625
It was moved and seconded
That Council Policy No. 6.33 “Cannabis Retail Store Processing and
Evaluation Criteria” be adopted.
CARRIED
1108 Solid Waste Curbside Collection – Termination of Request for Proposal
Process
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that all proponents
who submitted proposals for the provision of Solid Waste Curbside
Collection be notified that the City will not be proceeding with the initiative.
R/2018-626
It was moved and seconded
That all proponents who submitted proposals for the provision of Solid
Waste Curbside Collection in response to RFP-EN18-58 be notified that the
City will not be proceeding with the initiative.
CARRIED
Note: Item 1109 was withdrawn.
1109 Ridge Brewing Company Ltd. – Brewery Lounge Endorsement
Corporate Services
1131 Property and Liability Insurance Renewal
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that expenditures of
up to $390,000 for liability insurance and $260,000 for the City’s property
insurance policies as offered through the Municipal Insurance Association
of BC be approved.
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 13 of 15
R/2018-627
It was moved and seconded
That expenditures of up to $390,000 for the City’s liability insurance and
$260,000 for the City’s property insurance policies as offered through the
Municipal Insurance Association of BC be approved.
CARRIED
1132 TELUS Ground Lease Renewal
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that the disposition
via lease of City-owned property at 20601 Westfield Avenue to TELUS Inc.
for a five-year term be approved and that the Corporate Officer be
authorized to execute the associated lease documents.
R/2018-628
It was moved and seconded
That the disposition (via lease) of a portion of City-owned property located
at 20601 Westfield Avenue and legally described as; PID: 008-904-871,
Lot 816 District Lot 278 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 27494 to
TELUS INC. for a five-year term be approved and; further that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to execute the associated lease documents.
CARRIED
Parks, Recreation & Culture
1151 2019 Age-friendly Communities Grant Program
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that the submission
of the 2019 Age-friendly Communities Grant Program application to the
Union of British Columbia Municipalities be authorized and that a review of
wayfinding in the Town Centre proceed.
R/2018-629
It was moved and seconded
That staff be authorized to submit the 2019 Age-friendly Communities
Grant Program application to the Union of British Columbia Municipalities;
and further
That staff proceed with a review of wayfinding in the Town Centre and
develop recommendations for improvements to wayfinding through the
Place-Making, Wayfinding and Mapping Project.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 14 of 15
Administration (including Fire and Police)
1171 Replacement of Ruggedized Laptop Computers
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that a contract for
Ruggedized Laptop Computers by awarded to Island Key Computer Ltd and
that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
R/2018-630
It was moved and seconded
That a contract for Ruggedized Laptop Replacement be awarded to Island
Key Computer Ltd. for a contract price of $170,140.00 (excluding GST),
and;
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
CARRIED
1172 Community Resiliency Investment (CRI) Program – UBCM Grant Funding
Staff report dated November 27, 2018 recommending that an application
for grant funding be made to the Union of British Columbia Municipalities
Community Resiliency Investment Program for a Community Wildfire
Protection Plan update and that the overall grant management of the plan
update be provided by the City of Maple Ridge
R/2018-631
It was moved and seconded
1) That staff make application for grant funding to the Union of British
Columbia Municipalities Community Resiliency Investment Program for
a Community Wildfire Protection Plan update; and further,
2) That overall grant management for that Community Wildfire Protection
Plan update be provided by the City of Maple Ridge.
CARRIED
Other Committee Issues – Nil
1200 STAFF REPORTS – Nil
Council Meeting Minutes
November 27, 2018
Page 15 of 15
1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT – Nil
1400 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS – Nil
1500 MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS’ REPORTS
Councillor Yousef
Councillor Yousef encouraged all to volunteer for Operation Red Nose.
Councillor Dueck
Councillor Dueck encouraged citizens to volunteer for the Salvation Army
ringing of bells.
Councillor Svendsen
Councillor Svendsen reminded all of the December 1 Christmas in the Park
event.
Councillor Meadus
Councillor Meadus reported on the success she has had with raising the
profile of seniors in need throughout the community through social media.
Councillor Duncan
Councillor Duncan attended a meeting of Metro Conversations and the
Cinema Politica Fundraiser. She advised that Canadian Blood Services is
looking for donors.
Mayor Morden
Mayor Morden advised on upcoming strategic planning work to be done by
Council. He attended meetings with MLA’s, the Minister of Housing,
TransLink and Metro Vancouver.
1600 ADJOURNMENT – 8:32 p.m.
_______________________________
M. Morden, Mayor
Certified Correct
___________________________________
L. Benson, Corporate Officer
402 Minutes of the Public Hearing
402
City of Maple Ridge
PUBLIC HEARING
December 4, 2018
The Minutes of the Public Hearing held in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 11995 Haney
Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia on December 4, 2018 at 7:02 p.m.
____________________________________________________________________________
PRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Mayor M. Morden F. Quinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Councillor J. Dueck L Benson, Corporate Officer
Councillor K. Duncan C. Carter, Director of Planning
Councillor C. Meadus C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental
Councillor G. Robson Services
Councillor R. Svendsen A. Gaunt, Confidential Secretary
Councillor A. Yousef
______________________________________________________________________________
Mayor Morden called the meeting to order. The Corporate Officer explained the procedure
and rules of order of the Public Hearing and advised that the bylaws will be considered
further at the next Council Meeting on December 11, 2018.
The Mayor then called upon the Planning Department staff to present the following items on
the agenda:
1) 2017-580-RZ, 22866 128 Avenue
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7421-2018
To rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to R-1
(Residential District). The minimum lot size for the current RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) zone is 0.4 ha (1 acre), and the minimum lot size for the proposed R-1
(Residential District) zone is 371 m2 (3,994 ft²). The current application is to permit a
future subdivision into approximately seven single family residential lots.
The Corporate Officer advised that 35 letters were sent out and that letters were also
hand delivered due to the postal strike. Correspondence opposed to the application
was received from Lehel Fenyo.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a PowerPoint
presentation providing the following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Official Community Plan Context
Public Hearing Minutes
December 4, 2018
Page 2 of 5
• Neighbourhood Context
• Site Characteristics
• Proposed Site Plan
• Terms and Conditions
The Mayor called for speakers on first call.
Councillor Robson requested a point of clarification from staff pertaining to the road
pattern.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services advised on the road pattern
as outlined on the proposed site plan and clarified access to the proposed
development.
Perry Pasqualetto
Mr. Pasqualette is opposed to the application. He spoke on issues with parking
currently being experienced by the neighbourhood and expressed concern that the
additional residents in the proposed development will add to the existing problems. He
expressed that on 128 Avenue is a challenge and he concern is that any overflow
parking from the proposed development will expand to surrounding neighbourhoods.
Kevin Slauenwhite
Mr. Slauenwhite advised he is the property owner of acreage on the eastern border of
the development. He expressed concern with the impact on parking resulting from this
application however his main concern is groundwater runoff and the increase in
flooding on surrounding properties increasing his own. He outlined issues with flooding
residents are currently experiencing. Mr. Slauenwhite indicated he is not against
subdivision however he is against this particular plan and is in favor of the original
community plan where three lots in the application, his acreage and an acreage
property to the east were to be developed together. He reiterated his concerns with
the increase in traffic, parking and groundwater runoff.
Gail Rose
Ms. Rose is opposed to the application. She expressed concern with water in the area
which is currently a problem and feels this is increasing as more developments are
built.
Shaun Hokanson
Mr. Hokanson reiterated the concerns of previous speakers pertaining to parking. He is
opposed to the application and reported that when he purchased his property he was
told by a neighbour that no development behind his lot would take place without the
involvement of all three acreage property owners.
Public Hearing Minutes
December 4, 2018
Page 3 of 5
Dan Floritto
Mr. Floritto identified himself as the owner of the property in the application. He
advised on feedback and concerns received at a development information meeting
and indicated amendments made to the original plan to address concerns with the
impact on parking as well as privacy issues. He spoke to the concerns pertaining to
groundwater runoff and advised that discussions are being held on how to mitigate the
impact of increased rainfall on neighbouring properties. Mr. Floritto provided a
description of the types of homes being proposed and felt that the development met
the criteria brought forward by residents at the development information meeting.
Councillor Meadus requested a point of clarification as to what type of garage the
proposed houses will have.
Mr. Floritto provided clarification on garage layout, indicating that the garages will have
room for 2 vehicles and that there will be room for 2 vehicles in the driveway as well.
The Mayor called for speakers on second call.
Shaun Hokanson
Mr. Hokanson reiterated his concern with parking following clarification from the
applicant.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services clarified that the lane
through the development will be a fire lane only.
Perry Pasqualetto
Mr. Pasqualetto again expressed his concern with the impact on parking in the area
resulting from this development. He asked whether RV parking in driveways was
considered. He restated his concerns with drainage. Mr. Pasqualetto also expressed
concern that the application was a deviation from the original community plan and
urged Council to refer to the original plan and turn down this application.
Kevin Slauenwhite
Mr. Slauenwhite restated his concerns with groundwater and spoke on how water flow
has changed as a result of other subdivisions. He did not agree with the deviation from
the original community plan. He again expressed his concern with increased traffic
and parking impacting 128 Avenue and other neighbourhood streets.
The Mayor called for speakers on third call.
There being no further comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
Public Hearing Minutes
December 4, 2018
Page 4 of 5
2) 2018-332-RZ, 11641 227 Street
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7509-2018
An OCP amendment is required to add the subject property into Appendix D –
Temporary Use Permits of the OCP. The current application is to allow a sales centre
for a future apartment use.
The Corporate Officer advised that 253 letters were mailed out or hand delivered and
that correspondence opposed to the application was received from Lorne Patterson.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a PowerPoint
presentation providing the following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Official Community Plan Context
• Neighbourhood Context
• Presentation Centre Layout Proposal
• Presentation Centre Elevation Proposal
• Terms and Conditions
The Mayor called for speakers on first call.
Lorne Patterson
Mr. Patterson referred to a letter written to the Planning Department. He questioned
why a model apartment for a site which has not been approved as a building site for an
apartment building can be approved. He expressed concern that the property has
been excavated with no approval for building.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services provided clarification on this
application for use.
The Mayor called for speakers on second call.
The Mayor called for speakers on third call.
Ron Davis - Applicant
Mr. Davis spoke on the application to locate a sales centre on the property, indicating
that it is being requested to help develop interest in future development. He advised
on time lines and the requirement to have a sales centre as a necessity for pre sales.
There being no further comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
Public Hearing Minutes
December 4, 2018
Page 5 of 5
Having given all those persons whose interests were deemed affected by the matters
contained herein a chance to be heard, the Mayor adjourned the Public Hearing at 7:41 p.m.
____________________________
M. Morden, Mayor
Certified Correct
______________________________
L. Benson, Corporate Officer
700 ITEMS ON CONSENT
700
701 Minutes
701
701.1 Development Agreements Committee
701.1
701.2 Minutes of Meetings of Committees and Commissions of Council
701.2
702 Reports
702
Doc # 210527373 Page 1 of 2
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 11, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2105273
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Disbursements for the month ended November 30, 2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The disbursements summary for the past period is attached for information. All voucher payments
are approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor and the Chief Financial Officer or Corporate Controller.
Council authorizes the disbursements listing through Council resolution. Expenditure details are
available by request through the Finance Department.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the disbursements as listed below for the month ended November 30, 2018 be received for
information only.
GENERAL $ 9,504,454
PAYROLL $ 1,788,732
PURCHASE CARD $72,273
$ 11,365,459
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and
provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services.
The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan
b)Citizen/Customer Implications:
The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial
disbursements.
Doc # 210527373 Page 2 of 2
c)Business Plan/Financial Implications:
Highlights of larger items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution
BA Blacktop - Downtown enhancement project $ 630,229
Chandos Construction Ltd - Maple Ridge Leisure Centre upgrades $ 884,507
Fraser Valley Regional Library - 4th quarter member assessment $ 703,351
Greater Vancouver Water District - Water consumption Aug 1 - Aug 28 $ 1,014,619
MRC Total Build Lp - Drainage improvements - 232 St $ 371,351
Ridge Meadows Recycling Society - Monthly contract for recycling $ 207,783
Sandpiper Contracting Ltd - 232 St water main replacement $ 379,425
Tybo Constructors Ltd - Albion reservoir expansion $ 386,167
d)Policy Implications:
Corporate governance practice includes reporting the disbursements to Council monthly.
CONCLUSIONS:
The disbursements for the month ended November 30, 2018 have been reviewed and are in order.
“Original signed by Trevor Hansvall”
Prepared by: Trevor Hansvall
Accounting Clerk II
“Original signed by Trevor Thompson”
Approved by: Trevor Thompson, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Financial Officer
“Original signed by Frank Quinn for Paul Gill”
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
VENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNT
0981077 BC Ltd Security refund 27,500
Active Earth Engineering Ltd Drainage upgrade program - Albion flats 15,089
Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd Downtown beautification - Lougheed & 226 St 55,648
Watermain replacement (232 St)1,885 57,533
Arde Developments Ltd Security refund 16,353
Associated Engineering (BC) Ltd 225 St forcemain upgrade 32,888
240 St sewer upgrade 543 33,431
BA Blacktop Downtown enhancement project 630,229
Badger Daylighting Lp Hydro-excavation - multiple locations 16,909
Bartle & Gibson Co Ltd Plumbing, heating & electrical supplies:
Maple Ridge Library maintenance 1,122
Town centre maintenance 338
Traffic signals 13,200
Water connection supplies 638
Whonnock Lake building maintenance 540
Works yard inventory 3,513 19,350
BC Hydro Electricity 128,055
BC Hydro & Power Authority Sports lighting kiosk - Telosky Stadium 22,002
Streetlight kiosk - Lougheed & 225 St 27,220 49,223
BCRS Road Safe Inc Traffic control 23,775
Birdseye Office Inc 16 workstations/storage units - 50% deposit 24,240
Blue Pine Enterprises Ltd Stairs replacement - Red Alder Park 18,307
Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd Maintenance:
Banners 381
Maple Ridge Cemetery 123
Mclure Dr 500
Memorial Peace Park 23,068
Operations 879
Street lights 4,000
Street poles 2,313
Tree gates 4,384 35,647
CUPE Local 622 Dues - pay periods 18/20, 18/21 & 18/22 45,071
C3 Mainline Inspections Inc Video inspection of sanitary sewers 33,651
Cedar Crest Lands (BC) Ltd Telosky Stadium synthetic turf field 68,985
Chandos Construction Ltd Maple Ridge Leisure Centre upgrades 884,507
Craven Huston Albion neighbourhood learning and community centre 84,216
Cummins Western Canada Firetruck repairs 31,202
Eagle West Crane & Rigging Purchase and delivery of concrete barriers 15,001
Election Systems & Software Election supplies & rentals 17,660
Finning International Inc CAT 430F2 backhoe loader 126,777
Fitness Edge Contracted service provider - fitness classes & programs 23,523
Fraser Valley Regional Library 4th quarter member assessment 703,351
Area carpet 1,525
Contributed capital replacement funding 10,000 714,875
G6 Ventures (Rock Ridge) Ltd Security refund 248,685
Greater Vancouver Water District Water consumption Aug 1 - Aug 28/18 1,014,619
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGECITY OF MAPLE RIDGECITY OF MAPLE RIDGECITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - November 2018MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - November 2018MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - November 2018MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - November 2018
VENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNT
Hallmark Facility Services Inc Janitorial services & supplies:
City Hall 7,131
Fire Halls 9,471
Library 8,914
Operations 8,468
Randy Herman Building 9,917
RCMP 8,468
Whonnock Lake 1,680 54,051
Heavypdg Equipment Ltd CAT 320 rental 21,805
Homesite Developments (Zeron)Security refund 43,000
Horizon Landscape Contractors Grass cutting - Aug, Sep & Oct 53,653
Weeding - Hampstead 988 54,642
Jaaf Holdings Ltd Security refund 147,713
Jemspec Enterprises Inc Security refund 35,618
Lafarge Canada Inc Roadworks material 36,080
Langley Concrete & Tile Ltd Box/pipe puller equipment 15,232
Manulife Financial Employer/employee remittance 311,538
Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council Arts Centre contract 55,254
Program revenue - Oct 6,842 62,096
Mcelhanney Consulting Services 232 St (132 Ave - Silver Valley Road prelim & design)67,591
Drainage upgrade program - Albion flow monitoring 2,794 70,385
Medical Services Plan Employee medical & health premiums 20,250
Microsoft Corporation Microsoft Enterprise agreement true up 51,992
MRC Total Build Lp Drainage improvements - 232 St (132 Ave - Silver Valley Road)371,351
Municipal Pension Plan BC Employer/employee remittance 490,887
North Of 49 Enterprises Ltd Contracted service provider - skating lesson programs 17,428
Nustadia Recreation Inc Subsidized ice purchased by P&LS on behalf of user groups - Nov 27,542
Oaken Developments (Haney) Inc Security refund 100,662
Opus Consulting Group Ltd 8 Dell Latitude 5290 laptops 21,204
Parkland Refining (BC) Ltd Gasoline & diesel fuel 82,092
Paul Bunyan Tree Services Tree maintenance & damaged tree removal 18,000
Perpetual Success Enterprises Security refund 35,513
RF Binnie & Associates Ltd Arthur Peake Centre design 11,266
Synthetic turf replacement - Samuel Robertson Technical School 727
Telosky Stadium/Thomas Haney Secondary School 4,619 16,611
Receiver General For Canada Employer/employee remittance PP18/22 & PP18/23 652,599
Ridge Meadows Recycling Society Education - Wildsafe BC 1,250
Fall chipping program 2,139
Litter pickup contract 2,640
Miscellaneous litter pickup 68
Monthly contract for recycling 207,783
Weekly recycling 355 214,235
Rollins Machinery Ltd Bear proof garbage bins 17,104
Sandpiper Contracting Ltd 232 St watermain replacement 379,425
Sanscorp Products Ltd Roadworks material 16,849
Scottish Line Painting Ltd Thermoplastic road markings 73,835
SFE Ltd Nelson Peak sanitary sewer smoke testing 15,103
Temporary sewer flow monitoring services 35,438 50,541
Shape Architecture Inc Leisure Centre pool renovation 29,597
Stantec Consulting Ltd 263 St water pump station replacement 2,602
270A St reservoir 34,300 36,902
VENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNT
Total Power Ltd Generator maintenance:
Fire Halls 850
Library 213
Operations 814
Pump Stations 8,366
Whonnock Community Centre 1,218
Rental cables - Nov 5,472 16,932
Tybo Constructors Ltd Albion reservoir expansion 386,167
Urban Lumberjack Tree Services Roadside brush and chipping 20,734
Warrington PCI Management Advance for Tower common costs 79,832
Wilco Civil Inc Blaney Hamlet Park construction 44,768
Worldwideturf Inc Supply & install synthetic turf - Arthur Peake/Golden Ears Elementary 119,543
Zoom Audio Visual Networks Inc Digital signage 14,588
Replace projector bulbs - Firehall #1 717
Touchscreen monitor system - Webster Room 17,681 32,986
Disbursements In Excess $15,000 8,682,1538,682,1538,682,1538,682,153
Disbursements Under $15,000 822,301822,301822,301822,301
Total Payee Disbursements 9,504,4549,504,4549,504,4549,504,454
Payroll PP18/22 & PP18/23 1,788,7321,788,7321,788,7321,788,732
Purchase Cards - Payment 72,27372,27372,27372,273
Total Disbursements November 2018 11,365,45911,365,45911,365,45911,365,459
800 Unfinished Business
800
Doc # 2081243 Page 1 of 3
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 11, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: Doc # 2081243
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council Meeting
SUBJECT: 2020 BC Summer Games Nomination Committee
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On March 10, 2017, the City of Maple Ridge was awarded the opportunity to host the 2020 BC
Summer Games. The BC Games Society is poised to support the City in planning for the Games,
which begins with the selection of a Nomination Committee to make recommendations that will be
used to establish a Board of Directors to lead the organization and facilitation of the Games. This
report seeks Council’s endorsement to establish a Nomination Committee with key community
agencies invited to participate.
RECOMMENDATION:
That staff proceed with forming the 2020 BC Summer Games Nomination Committee; and
That the City of Maple Ridge Mayor be appointed as Chair of the Nomination Committee; and,
That the General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture and Recreation Manager Health & Wellness
be appointed to the Nomination Committee; and
That the Katzie First Nation, Kwantlen First Nation, School District No. 42 Board, Meadow Ridge and
Haney Rotary Clubs, Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Chamber of Commerce and the Maple Ridge
Downtown Business Improvement Association be invited to participate on the 2020 BC Summer
Games Nomination Committee; and further
That should any community agencies decline the invitation to participate on the Nomination
Committee, other groups will be considered at the discretion of the Mayor and General Manager
Parks, Recreation & Culture.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
At the June 20, 2016 Committee of the Whole meeting, Council endorsed the submission of
a bid to host either the 2020 or 2022 BC Summer Games. On March 10, 2017, the BC
Games Society awarded the 2020 BC Summer Games to the City of Maple Ridge.
The bi-annual Games are an important step in the development of high performance
athletes, with some continuing onto national and international competition. The 4-day
celebration will bring vibrancy and energy to the community with over 3,500 athletes,
Doc # Doc # Doc # Doc # 2081243208124320812432081243 Page Page Page Page 2222 of of of of 3333
coaches and officials, and many more spectators expected to come from around the
Province. Historically, host cities have benefitted through sport development legacies and
strengthened community pride through volunteerism and participation. In addition, local and
regional economic benefits are expected due to the volume of visitors to the city during and
after the Games.
The BC Games Society recommends 12 members for the Nomination Committee composed
of municipal Council and senior staff representatives, a School District Board representative,
and broad representation from the community. To ensure a wide variety of expertise and
connections to community leaders, it is recommended that the 2020 BC Summer Games
Nomination Committee be composed of the following:
• City of Maple Ridge Mayor (Chair)
• City of Maple Ridge General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture
• City of Maple Ridge Recreation Manager Health & Wellness
• Katzie First Nation representative
• Kwantlen First Nation representative
• School District No. 42 Board representative
• Meadow Ridge and/or Haney Rotary representative
• Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Chamber of Commerce representative
• Maple Ridge Downtown Business Improvement Association representative
• An Arts and Cultural community representative
Should any of the community agencies decline the invitation to participate on the Nomination
Committee, other groups will be considered at the discretion of the Mayor and General
Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture to ensure we remain on track with the BC Summer
Games timeline.
Nomination Committee members will meet regularly from January to March 2019 to develop
and execute the plan for recruiting Directors for the Games’ Board. This includes
participation in recruitment meetings to select 16 volunteer Directors including a President
and Vice President. Once a proposed membership list has been determined, it will be
presented to Maple Ridge City Council to make the final decision.
b)b)b)b) Desired OutcomeDesired OutcomeDesired OutcomeDesired Outcome::::
The desired outcome is to form a robust Nomination Committee composed of knowledgeable
individuals who are well-positioned to invite leaders in our community to serve as part of a
strong and capable Board of Directors for the 2020 BC Summer Games.
c)c)c)c) StraStraStraStrategic Alignmenttegic Alignmenttegic Alignmenttegic Alignment::::
Hosting the 2020 BC Summer Games aligns with the 2010 Parks, Recreation & Culture
Master Plan which contains the strategic objective to provide opportunities that contribute to
building individual and community capacity, and to build upon effective and valued
partnerships and strategic alliances with other service providers in a coordinated and
collaborative system for the provision of facilities and service delivery.
d)d)d)d) Citizen/Customer Citizen/Customer Citizen/Customer Citizen/Customer Implications:Implications:Implications:Implications:
It is anticipated that up to 3000 volunteer positions will be available for citizens of Maple
Ridge to participate in the Games in various capacities from Directorate roles to facility hosts.
There will also be numerous opportunities for the community to attend a wide variety of
Doc # 2081243 Page 3 of 3
sporting and participatory events leading up to and during the Games as spectators to take
in the atmosphere and cheer on the athletes.
e)Business Plan/Financial Implications:
On June 20, 2016, Council approved a one-time municipal budget commitment of $45,000
cash and a minimum $50,000 of in-kind resources in the form of staff support and facility
use to support the 2020 BC Summer Games. School District No. 42 will also contribute
significantly to the hosting of the Games through the provision of 12 school sites and
facilities for competition and athlete accommodation.
Previous host cities have relied on sponsorship and donations to fund additional Games
operating expenses. A significant goal of the Board of Directors will be to undertake this
fundraising work to secure additional funding.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Nomination Committee’s selection of the 2020 BC Summer Games Board of Directors will set
the foundation for a comprehensive, organized, and successful Games experience.
“Original signed by Christa Balatti”
Prepared by: Christa Balatti, BA
Recreation Manager Health & Wellness
“Original signed by Danielle Pope”
Reviewed by: Danielle Pope
Director of Recreation & Community Engagement
“Original signed by Kelly Swift”
Approved by: Kelly Swift, MBA
General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture
Original signed by Paul Gill”
“Original signed by Frank Quinn for”
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachments:
A)2018-11-07 - Letter - BC Games Society to Mayor Morden
Doc # 2101620 Page 1 of 4
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 11, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: Doc # 2101620
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Maple Ridge Youth Planning Table Terms of Reference
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At Council Workshop on December 12, 2017, Council resolved that staff be directed to work with the
Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Katzie Community Network (CN) to develop Terms of Reference for a
Planning Table to oversee development of a draft implementation schedule for the Maple Ridge
Youth Strategy (Attachment A). Following this direction, staff has worked with the CN to develop
Terms of Reference for a Youth Planning Table (YPT). The recommended structure is similar to that of
the Ridge Meadows Community Children’s Table (RMCCT) in that the YPT is proposed as a standing
committee of the CN that reports to the Social Policy Advisory Committee (SPAC). The proposed YPT
Terms of Reference (Attachment B) include a list of key agencies previously identified by Council for
possible membership. Council’s endorsement of the proposed YPT structure will invite broad
community input on a Youth Strategy implementation schedule that would be developed by the YPT
and brought forward to Council for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Youth Planning Table Terms of Reference be endorsed; and further
That staff report back with a draft implementation schedule for the Maple Ridge Youth Strategy as
proposed by the Youth Planning Table.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The Maple Ridge Youth Strategy is an initiative of the SPAC, and was endorsed by Council on
October 24, 2016. The Youth Strategy was created with the support of the community and a
high level of youth engagement, and includes recommendations that support, engage, and
empower Maple Ridge youth and emerging adults. Key partners in the Youth Strategy include
School District No. 42 (SD42), the CN and their membership. Successful implementation of the
strategy will rely upon continued community engagement, support from senior levels of
government and other agencies.
The strategy is comprehensive, includes a number of recommendations and action items, and
categorizes three distinct roles for the City to achieve successful implementation: leadership,
partnership and advocacy. These roles highlight that the City has influence over many aspects
that affect local youth, while acknowledging that some issues require support, funding or
Doc # 2101620 Page 2 of 4
guidance from senior levels of government, other agencies and local community organizations
who participated in the development of the Youth Strategy.
The YPT fits well into the structure of the CN, which is comprised of representatives from
community organizations, service providers, government ministries, municipal government and
interested community members that are involved in local services for children, youth, adults,
families and seniors. The CN already has a number of standing committees and task groups,
such as the long-standing RMCCT that addresses the needs of infants and children in the
community. The proposed YPT would build on the efforts of the RMCCT by offering a similar
level of preventative response to older children and their families. In addition, the YPT could
benefit from the support of the CN coordinator, specifically during the initial phase of its
development, as well as the ongoing benefits that would be accrued through the continued
engagement of key agencies in the development and implementation of the Youth Strategy.
Given these synergies, it is recommended that Council endorse the YPT Terms of Reference to
establish the Table as a standing committee of the CN.
The proposed membership and draft Terms of Reference have been developed with input from
the CN, the SD42 Board of Education, and the previous Council. The draft Terms of Reference
outlines the mandate, roles and responsibilities, reporting structure and general function of the
proposed YPT. Schedule A of the Terms of Reference outlines additional interest groups that
will be invited to sit at this Table. The following proposed membership includes the
representatives identified directly in the Terms of Reference as well as Schedule A. The result
is a diverse group representative of a wide range of community service providers, some of
whom may only be active as part of a working group of the YPT.
City of Maple Ridge Council liaison
City of Maple Ridge staff liaison (non-voting)
School District No. 42 Board liaison
School District No. 42 Parent Advisory Council liaison
School District No. 42 staff liaison (non-voting)
Child Protective Services, Provincial Ministry of Children and Family Development
Aboriginal Child & Youth Mental Health, Provincial Ministry of Children and
Family Development
Child & Youth Mental Health, Provincial Ministry of Children and Family Development
Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Katzie Community Network Coordinator (non-voting)
Social Policy Advisory Committee youth representative
Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Community Services
Youth Unlimited
Fraser Health Authority
Work BC
Alouette Addictions Services
Ridge Meadows RCMP
Kiwanis Club of Golden Ears
Inclusion BC
The Family Education and Support Centre
It is valuable to note that the CN has membership on SPAC, and has been engaged in the
development of the Youth Strategy since the beginning of the process. Moving forward, the
SPAC representative on the YPT will provide progress updates to SPAC, ensuring a strong and
Doc # 2101620 Page 3 of 4
consistent link to Council and regular updates on the development of the Youth Strategy
implementation schedule. Furthermore, the draft Terms of Reference propose a reporting
structure that includes an annual update to Council constituted by a presentation from the YPT
Chair and SPAC representative. This will provide Council with an opportunity to measure
progress and review outcomes to ensure that the needs of youth in the community continue to
be a priority.
b)Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome is that the YPT is established within an appropriate structure to develop
an implementation schedule for Council’s consideration and to support implementation of the
Youth Strategy for the benefit of youth and emerging adults in our community.
c)Strategic Alignment:
The establishment of the YPT aligns with the endorsed Maple Ridge Youth Strategy and the
2010 Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan.
d)Citizen/Customer Implications:
The proposed YPT membership includes a wide range of community representatives to develop
and guide the Youth Strategy implementation, including youth, emerging adults and community
partners. Their work on an implementation schedule and youth services projects will positively
impact the health and wellness of youth, emerging adults, their families and the wider
community.
e)Business Plan/Financial Implications
Staff anticipate that $2000 will be required for the administration of the Youth Planning Table,
the cost of which can be covered within the 2019 Parks, Recreation & Culture budget. Future
costs associated with the YPT administration and implementation of the Youth Strategy will be
defined by the YPT, and requests of the City will be brought forward as part of the business
planning process. In addition, the YPT will actively seek grant funding where appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Maple Ridge Youth Strategy is a comprehensive document that outlines strategies to achieve a
foundation for community collaboration that enhances services and support for youth and their
families and contributes to an optimal environment in which children, youth and emerging adults can
grow, work and play. The Youth Strategy has been presented to key stakeholders and has received
support and endorsement. The establishment of a YPT as a standing committee of the CN would
allow for broad input on a draft implementation schedule and provide a vehicle to steward this work.
“Original signed by Tony Cotroneo”
Prepared by: Tony Cotroneo
Manager of Community Engagement
“Original signed by Danielle Pope”
Reviewed by: Danielle Pope
Director of Recreation & Community Engagement
Doc # 2101620 Page 4 of 4
“Original signed by Kelly Swift”
Approved by: Kelly Swift, MBA
General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
“Original signed by Frank Quinn for”
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachments:
(A) Maple Ridge Youth Strategy (online at mapleridge.ca/DocumentCenter/View/12207)
(B) Maple Ridge Youth Planning Table Terms of Reference
Maple Ridge Youth Planning Table Terms of Reference Page 1
Maple Ridge Youth Planning Table
Terms of Reference
Vision
The vision of the Maple Ridge Youth Planning Table (YPT) is the achievement of the goals
outlined in the Maple Ridge Youth Strategy through collaboration with youth, their families
and local agencies to foster a community that supports and engages youth in nurturing their
mental, social and physical health and wellbeing.
Mission
The mission of the YPT is to act as a responsive, goal-oriented, project-based work group
focused on accomplishing the goals and recommendations of the Maple Ridge Youth
Strategy to support the resilience of all children, youth and emerging adults in Maple Ridge
now and in the future.
Functions
Prioritize the recommendations in the Maple Ridge Youth Strategy to develop a draft
implementation schedule.
Inventory current community resources and programs to identify those that align with
recommendations in the Maple Ridge Youth Strategy.
Identify funding sources to implement actions from the Maple Ridge Youth Strategy.
Ensure the following surveys are conducted every 3 years, beginning in 2019, to track
local trends pertaining to youth needs and ensure the continued relevance of the
Youth Strategy recommendations.
Children, Youth & Emerging Adults Survey
Parents, Legal Guardians, Caregivers & Service Providers Survey
Meet with District School Advisory Committee annually.
Report to the Social Planning Advisory Committee biannually.
Report to Maple Ridge City Council annually.
Report to School District No. 42 Board of Education annually.
Report to the Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Katzie Community Network annually.
Member Duties
Attend meetings as required and actively participate in the group’s work.
Represent the interests of Maple Ridge Youth Planning Table members.
Act as an advocate for the Maple Ridge Youth Strategy.
Membership
The YPT shall consist of Executive members and members at large. The Executive will act as
the Selection Committee for member at large applicants and may perform additional
administrative roles including dispute resolution.
Community service providers that are members at large shall provide a commitment letter
confirming their agency’s ongoing membership on an annual basis.
Executive members:
City of Maple Ridge Council liaison
City of Maple Ridge staff liaison (non-voting)
School District No. 42 Board of Education liaison
School District No. 42 staff liaison (non-voting)
Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Katzie Community Network (CN) Coordinator (non-voting)
YPT Chair
Maple Ridge Youth Planning Table Terms of Reference Page 2
Members at large:
Youth representing the areas of:
Sports, recreation and/or culture
Emerging adults (18-24 years)
Youth with lived experience
Other interest groups as defined by Council (Schedule A)
Membership Terms
The members at large shall serve for a term of two years commencing at their time of
appointment. In order to stagger the terms of appointment to the Table, half of the first
members will be appointed for a term of one year. Subsequent appointments shall be for a
term of two years.
YPT Executive members may choose to remove a member from the Table for consecutive
non-attendance at three meetings (unless previously approved by the Table) or if a member
is unable to perform member duties.
Meetings
YPT will operate with a standing agenda and special agenda items will be forwarded
to the CN Coordinator and YPT Chair a minimum of five days in advance of the next
scheduled meeting.
YPT will meet a minimum of 6 times per year or at the call of the Chair.
The role of Chair will rotate on an annual basis through election by YPT members and
shall not be held by municipal or SD 42 staff.
The CN Coordinator will take minutes and distribute them within a minimum of five
days in advance of the next scheduled meeting.
Schedule A
Maple Ridge Youth Planning Table
Proposed Interest Groups
Interest Group Value Added
Alouette Addictions Services Promotes healthier lifestyles free from substance
use
Fraser Health Authority Works to improve the health of the population
and the quality of life of children/youth/emerging
adults
Inclusion BC Provincial federation whose members include
people with intellectual disabilities, their families
and community agencies.
Kiwanis Club of Golden Ears Supports YPT in fundraising opportunities
Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Community Services Represents the Youth Wellness Centre
Ministry of Children and Family Development Provincial representation of children/youth under
the age of 18
Ministry of Children and Family Development
Aboriginal Child Youth Mental Health
Provides child protection services, family
services, child and youth mental health services,
Aboriginal services, and youth justice services
Ministry of Children and Family Development
Child Youth Mental Health
Provides services for youth (12-17 inclusive) who
require a stay at hospital because of a serious
mental health concern and for individuals who
live with co-existing developmental disabilities
and a mental illness
Ridge Meadows RCMP Youth crime prevention
School District No. 42 Parent Advisory Council Parents perspective for school-aged children
Social Policy Advisory Committee Youth
Representative
To report back to SPAC
The Family Education and Support Centre Facilitating growth and development in families
and communities by responding to the need for
information, education, resources and support
Work BC Youth and emerging adult employment and
training
Youth Unlimited Offers programing that is relevant and fun to
support youth connection and transformation,
helping young people discover their potential
803 Motion by Councillor Robson
“That a letter be sent to the Provincial Government expressing Maple Ridge
Council’s support for the immediate permitting of ride-share services such as
UBER.”
803
900 Correspondence
900
From: Joanna Schofield <joannas@innervisionsrecovery.com>
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 2:18 PM
To: Mayor Council and CAO Users List <MayorCouncilAndCaol@mapleridge.ca>
Subject: support letter
Dear Mayor Morden
I am writing this to you as one of the Directors of InnerVisions Recovery Society. We operate residential
drug and alcohol treatment facilities in Maple Ridge and Port Coquitlam.
We are currently writing a proposal to help clean and sober individuals gain employment skills and work
experience in the cooking and food service industries. An important part of the proposal is to have
support from our community. I am wondering if you would be willing to support this important project
so we can help some people become productive members of society. If you are willing to a short letter
stating so would be fantastic!
We truly appreciate you taking the time to consider our request and please do not hesitate to contact
me if you have any questions
Joanna Schofield
Director
InnerVisions Recovery Society
11982 Laity Street
Maple Ridge BC
V2X 5A6
778-835-1919
joannas@innervisionsrecovery.com
901
1000 Bylaws
1000
1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 11, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2018-321-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: Consultation Summary Report and Next
Steps
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Council has previously directed the research and review of electric vehicle charging station
requirements for new development in the City. The intent of the work was to look at options to
integrate electric vehicle charging stations into City development regulations.
At the July 17, 2018 Workshop, Council considered and discussed a set of proposed regulatory
changes pertaining to electric vehicle charging options for new development and endorsed a
consultation program to engage the development community and other external stakeholders. An
extensive outreach effort has now been concluded and the development community and interested
stakeholders have expressed broad levels of support for the proposed EV requirements for new
development. With feedback on the regulatory options, staff are reporting back to Council and are
recommending that Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7489-2018 (attached in
Appendix B) be given first, second and third reading.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7489-2018 be given first, second
and third reading.
BACKGROUND:
a)Work to date
Council has previously directed the research and review of electric vehicle charging station
requirements. Subsequently staff conducted research on best practices related to electric vehicle
(EV) charging infrastructure, including undertaking a scan of EV charging infrastructure regulations in
other municipalities. The intent of the work was to look at options to integrate EV charging stations
into City development regulations.
At the July 17, 2018 Workshop, Council considered and discussed the proposed regulatory changes
pertaining to electric vehicle options for new development and endorsed a consultation program to
engage the development community.
At the July 17, 2018 Workshop Council passed the following resolution:
That the bylaw amendments required for the integration of electric vehicle charging stations into
new developments be brought forward for Council consideration following the consultation
process outlined in this report titled “Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: Options for New
Development”, dated July 17, 2018.
1001
2
b) EV Charging Infrastructure Spectrum
In 2016, the Provincial Building Act was revised to clarify that local governments can regulate the
use of EV charging infrastructure in new developments. Currently, there are a range of EV charging
infrastructure installation options for new development, which ranges from partial roughed-in
configurations – when some of the infrastructure required for the charging of an EV is provided
(making it easier to retrofit a building for EV charging to the future) – to complete Electric Vehicle
Supply Equipment (EVSE) where all infrastructure required for the charging of an EV is provided (as
illustrated in Figure 1 below).
Figure 1 – EV Charging Infrastructure Spectrum
Source: City of Maple Ridge
The municipal scan summarized in the July 17, 2018 staff report indicated that many municipalities
are opting for the energized middle ground configuration where all infrastructure required for the
charging of an EV is provided, excluding the charging stations. This means that the outlet boxes or
electrical receptacles located at each stall are “energized” (i.e. electrically wired) and are dedicated
for the charging of an EV with an electrical system adequately sized to accommodate the charging of
EVs.
c) Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) Technologies
There are three commonly used types of charging stations.
Level 1 chargers uses a standard house plug (found in many garages already) and provides
the slowest charging, so it is good for overnight charging or all day at work. A Level 1 charger
provides approximately 9 km of driving range for every one hour of charging.
Level 2 chargers uses a dedicated 240V circuit like the one used for a clothes dryer. In
addition to being installed at home and at work, Level 2 charging stations are commonly
found in public locations where people typically spend a couple hours, such as a community
centre. A Level 2 charger can provide approximately 30 km of driving range for every one
hour of charging. All of the EV chargers the City oversees are Level 2.
Level 3 chargers, now typically called DC Fast Chargers (DCFC), are usually located along
major transportation corridors. DCFCs provide a much stronger charge at a faster rate. A
Level 3 charger can provide approximately 160 km of driving range for every one hour of
charging, however not all electric vehicles can plug in to a DCFC.
CONSULTATION:
a) Process
The consultation process included reaching out to the UDI/GVHBA Development Liaison Committee,
including the Urban Development Institute (UDI) and Greater Vancouver Home Builders Association
3
(GVHBA); Condominium Homeowners Association; BC Hydro and associated programs; as well as
representatives from Plug-In BC and Emotive; Fraser Basin Council (Charging Support Program for
Multi-Family Dwellings); Metro Vancouver; our neighbouring municipalities, the City of Pitt Meadows
and the District of Mission; the Province of B.C.; Fraser Health; and School District 42. In addition,
staff made two presentations to the UDI/GVHBA Development Liaison Committee throughout the
review process.
b) Proposed EV Charging Requirements
The proposed EV requirements for new development that were brought to the Development Liaison
Committee and other stakeholders included:
Require all off-street residential parking spaces in multi-family developments to be energized
(Level 2).
Require all visitor parking at multi-family developments to be wired for a minimum of Level 1.
Require 10% of parking spaces to be energized (Level 2) in addition the charging station for
all commercial and institutional developments with 10 or more required off-street parking
spaces.
Require 1 space for each principal dwelling unit to be energized (Level 2) in single family,
duplex, triplex, fourplex and courtyard developments. Secondary Suites and Detached
Garden Suites proposed to be exempt.
Multi-Family
Residential Development
Commercial and Institutional
Development
Ground Oriented
Residential Development
Require all off-street
residential parking spaces in
multi-family developments to
be energized (Level 2).
All visitor parking be wired
for a minimum of Level 1
Require 10% of parking spaces
to be energized (Level 2) along
with the charging stations.
Applicable to developments
with 10 or more off-street
parking spaces.
Require 1 space for each
principal dwelling unit to be
energized (Level 2).
Secondary suites and
detached garden suites
exempt.
c) Feedback
Following Council’s direction, staff reached out to development industry representatives to discuss
the proposed set of regulatory requirements, based on the best practice research and municipal
scan outlined in previous reports. The development community and interested stakeholders
expressed broad levels of support for the proposed EV requirements for new development. It was
identified that the proposed requirements would help ‘future-proof’ new development as well as help
future residents and strata’s avoid costly retrofits going forward. A summary of stakeholder
comments are provided below with copies of the formal correspondence available in Appendix A).
City of Maple Ridge UDI/GVHBA Development Liaison Committee
Following the September 28th Development Liaison Committee meeting, the Urban Development
Institute and Greater Vancouver Home Builders’ Association submitted a letter reiterating the
specific comments and recommendations that were provided at the meeting:
Generally supportive of the policy proposal as they are similar to what other jurisdictions are
currently implementing;
Interest in exploring and encouraging Smart Charging and Energy Management Software to
support the proposed EV charging infrastructure requirements;
4
Provided suggestions on how certain use requirements could be adjusted, such as treating
the EV charging parking requirements of underground ‘parkades’ differently than
townhomes;
Sought clarity on how in-stream development applications will be grandfathered if the City
does adopt EV charging requirements; and
Requested information bulletins or developing educational workshops on incorporating EV
charging requirements in developments to ensure that the City’s requirements are
implemented effectively.
The full letter is included in Appendix A.
Condominium Homeowners Association (CHOA)
CHOA indicated that they support the proposed requirements for electric vehicle chargers in new
developments. For CHOA, common challenges in retrofitting EV charging stations include having
access to sufficient electrical capacity without a significant upgrade and that new buildings often
have limited parking spaces near the necessary electrical services. The resulting upgrades and
electrical alterations are often a significant financial barrier to Strata Corporations and/or residents.
As per the proposed requirements, new developments with sufficient electrical service and
accessible hard-wired access points would in the future help reduce those challenges for those who
live in multi-family buildings. CHOA also provided a copy of their newest guide on installing electric
vehicle supply equipment and how to charge user fees in condominiums.
BC Hydro
BC Hydro supports the proposed requirements and considers it a positive addition to th e growing
number of EV charging infrastructure bylaws within the Metro Vancouver region. BC Hydro staff
suggests increasing the level of charging infrastructure required for visitor parking in multi -family
developments but reducing the share of stalls that would need to provide charging infrastructure.
Metro Vancouver
Metro Vancouver indicates that the proposed residential charging requirements are progressive and
in line with some of the leading jurisdictions around Metro Vancouver. Metro Vancouver indicates
that the requirements may ensure buildings are future-proofed to allow tenants access to charging
and avoid costly retrofits. Metro Vancouver staff also indicate that their preference would be
increase visitor parking requirements for multi-family buildings to Level 2 charging infrastructure and
reduce the number of stalls required to be energized for EV charging.
Plug-In BC (Fraser Basin Council)
Plug-In BC noted that the proposed requirements are in line with EV market uptake trends and will
help address the substantial barriers residents and owners of multi-family buildings, recognizing that
at home is the most critical charging location for EV owners.
Fraser Health
Fraser Health recognizes the importance of encouraging the use of electric vehicles to protect both
public health and the environment and is generally supportive of the proposed requirements . Fraser
Health does recommend taking the proposed EV charging station requirements into consideration as
the City considers options to encourage unit and housing affordability.
5
School District 42
SD 42 recognizes the value of increasing EV chargers in the community, but does not support the
inclusion of institutional sites given the proposed amount of EV chargers that could be required on
future school grounds.
DISCUSSION:
a) Proposed EV Parking Requirements for Residential Visitor Use
Having heard largely supportive and positive feedback on the proposed EV charging infrastructure
requirements for new development, staff support moving forward with the proposed requirements,
with a change to the visitor requirement requirements for multi-family developments.
Originally, it was proposed that each visitor parking space would be required to be energized for a
minimum of Level 1 charging. However, the Development Liaison Committee, BC Hydro and Metro
Vancouver staff raised two points for consideration.
The first consideration is that Level 1 charging is best suited for long charging sessions. Level 2
charging infrastructure can charge an EV more quickly as it can provide more electricity and is more
in-line with the temporary or short-term intent of visitor parking.
Second, the issue was raised about whether residents would use the visitor parking spots to charge
rather than use their own parking space as a way to avoid expenses to their own electricity bill. One
method to minimize these events from occurring would be to have the EV charging infrastructure
require card access / proof of payment. At a Level 1 charging level, this can be a challenge however
Level 2 EV charging infrastructure is more than capable of requiring card access / proof of payment
in order to access the charger. Most publically available EV charging infrastructure today already
requires some form of card access / proof of payment, including those located at City Hall.
Therefore, having heard the development community and stakeholder comments, it is now
suggested that 50% of the required visitor parking spaces at multi-family developments be wired for
a minimum of Level 2 charging.
b) Proposed EV Parking Requirements for Townhouse Use
The Development Liaison Committee encouraged staff to consider reviewing the proposed EV
parking requirements for Townhouse and Street Townhouse developments as the nature of the
parking (i.e. attached garages) are more in line with other ground-oriented forms of developments
rather than the underground parkades used for apartment developments. Initially proposed that
each required off-street parking space in a Townhouse development would be required to be
energized (Level 2). Staff now recommend that Townhouse and Street Townhouse follow the same
requirements as other ground-oriented forms of development. Namely, that one energized outlet
(Level 2) be provided per dwelling unit.
c) Smart Charging and Energy Management Software Guidance
The Development Liaison Committee requested clarity that Energy Management Systems (EMS) may
be used so that electricity for charging can be shared across stalls. EMS can manage, monitor and
control the supply of electricity through the EV charging infrastructure. Should Council support the
changes to the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw to require EV charging infrastructure in new
developments, staff will develop handouts for developers that will describe how Smart Charging and
EMS software can be used to satisfy the bylaw and other code requirements.
6
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND INTERDEPARTMENTAL IMPLICATIONS:
BC Utilities Commission
The BC Utilities Commission (BCUC) regulates the sale and resale of electricity in B.C. BCUC
conducted an inquiry to assess the regulatory needs associated with EV charging service. Phase One
of the Electric Vehicle Charging Service Inquiry Report, released on November 26 2018,
recommends that Strata Corporations and other landlords that provide EV charging services for
compensation be exempted from the BCUC’s regulation. The report recommends that BCUC would
retain their oversight on safety but price and terms of service would not be regulated.
It is anticipated that Phase Two of the Electric Vehicle Charging Service Inquiry will provide additional
details on the regulatory framework for EV charging service providers that are considered public
utilities (e.g. BC Hydro and Fortis BC) and have not been recommended for exemption.
Provincial Government
According to the Office of the Premier, the provincial government may introduce legislation in 2019
to phase in targets for the sale of zero emission vehicles (ZEVs). This legislation would set targets of
10% ZEV sales by 2025, 30% by 2030, and 100% by 2040. The provincial government may also
take additional steps to make ZEVs more affordable.
Building Department
The Building Department has been working in collaboration with the Planning Department on the
development of EV regulation. The Building Department supports and encourages the installation of
EV chargers in the community. Should the proposed changes be adopted, the Building Department
will work with the Planning Department to develop reference handouts for developers , including how
Smart Charging and Energy Management Software can support EV charging infrastructure.
DRAFT BYLAW:
As directed, staff have now concluded its extensive outreach to the development community and
other interested stakeholders on the proposed requirements for EV charging infrastructure for new
development. Having heard strong support for the proposed amendments to introduce EV charging
requirements for new development in the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw, Bylaw No. 7489-
2018 has been prepared for consideration of first, second and third reading. The full text of Off-
Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 7489-2018 is available in Appendix B.
Table 1: Summary of Proposed EV Requirements for New Development for Maple Ridge Off-Street
Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7489-2018, as revised through the consultation process
Apartment
Residential Development
Commercial and Institutional
Development
Ground Oriented
Residential Development
Require all off-street
residential parking spaces in
apartment developments to
be energized (Level 2).
50% visitor parking be
wired for a minimum of
Level 2
Require 10% of parking
spaces to be energized (Level
2) along with the charging
stations.
Applicable to
developments with 10 or
more off-street parking
spaces.
Require 1 space for each principal
dwelling unit of single family,
duplex, triplex, fourplex, courtyard,
townhouse and street townhouse
developments to be energized
(Level 2).
Secondary suites and detached
garden suites exempt.
7
NEXT STEPS:
Should the Bylaw be adopted, the Building Department will work with the Planning Department to
develop reference handouts for developers, including how Smart Charging and Energy Management
Software can support EV charging infrastructure.
As is customary with such bylaws, staff will continue to monitor and report back within one year on
any impacts from the proposed EV charging infrastructure requirements, should they be adopted.
CONCLUSION:
This report provides an update to Council on the discussion with the development community and
stakeholder consultation that has been completed to-date regarding the proposed electric vehicle
charging infrastructure requirements for new development. Based on the feedback received, it is
recommended that Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 7489-2018 be considered for first,
second and third reading.
“Original signed by Amanda Grochowich”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Amanda Grochowich, MCIP, RPP
Planner 1
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL., MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Frank Quinn for Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
Appendix A – Stakeholder Consultation
Appendix B – Draft Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7489-2018
1
October 11, 2018
Frank Quinn
General Manager, Public Works & Development Services
City of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9
Re: Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: Options for New Development Report
Dear Mr. Quinn,
I would like to thank you and your staff for consulting with the Development Liaison
Committee (DLC) on Electric Vehicle Charging (EVC) in new projects. As you know this is an
important issue to our industry. Increasing the usage of electric vehicles (EVs) is an
emerging option that will assist Maple Ridge in achieving its Greenhouse Gas (GHG)
reduction goals. However, EVC infrastructure will add costs to new homebuyers; many of
whom will not utilize the infrastructure as the current market share for EVs is still relatively
small - although it is growing.
We appreciate the efforts that Maple Ridge staff have taken to review how EVC has been
adopted in other municipalities in the Region, and UDI and GVHBA are generally supportive
of the policy proposals because they are similar to other jurisdictions. We would like to
reiterate the specific comments and recommendations we provided at the September 28 th
DLC meeting.
We ask that the City wait until the current British Columbia Utilities Commission Inquiry
into the Regulation of Electric Vehicle Charging Service is completed before passing an
EVC policy. One of the issues that they are reviewing is the regulatory requirements
regarding how costs associated with EVC can be charged back to consumers. This is a
key issue for the third parties contracted by developers to provide EVC services in new
buildings. The Commission should be releasing their report by the end of the October.
UDI would also like clarity in the Policy that Energy Management Systems (EMS) can be
used, so electricity for charging can be shared across stalls. This is being allowed in
other municipalities across Metro Vancouver, and it reduces the projected electric ity load
of new buildings. This could save a tremendous amount of money for projects as less
hydro infrastructure could be required (e.g. a transformer can be used instead of a sub -
station).
URBAN DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE – PACIFIC REGION
#200 – 602 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 1P2 Canada
T. 604.669.9585 F. 604.689.8691
www.udi.bc.ca
GREATER VANCOUVER HOME BUILDERS’ ASSOCIATION
#1003, 7495 – 132 Street
Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1J8 Canada
T. 778-565-4288
www.gvhba.org
APPENDIX A
2
Coquitlam and Port Coquitlam have opted to initially require on e EVC stall per unit in
parkades of multi-family buildings. We ask that Maple Ridge consider the same approach
at this time. While electric vehicles are becoming more and more popular there is a wide
gap between what the City is proposing to require and wh at the demand is currently.
The staff report itself notes that the City has just three public charging locations and
even these are not at full capacity. As EV market share increases, UDI would support
these requirements increasing as well.
Even with EMS being allowed and changing the requirements to having EVC services for
each unit (instead of each stall), there may still be a few times when EVC infrastructure
results in a substantial increase in hydro servicing costs. UDI suggests that you be given
the ability to reduce the requirements in circumstances in which there is financial
hardship. This may result in fewer GHGs being emitted. If the hydro infrastructure costs
are too high, builders can opt to utilize more natural gas in their projects to reduce
electricity loads, which would undermine the City’s GHG reduction goals.
“Parkades” need to be defined differently from townhomes, as some townhomes can
have private attached garages – like single-family homes.
In townhomes where double attached garages exist, it would reduce costs if developers
were able to provide charges with double connections, so there is one power source but
two vehicles can plug into it. Also, EMS technology is being developed for units with
attached garages, so EV charging would turn off when other major appliances (e.g.
dishwashers, dryers and washing machines) are being used.
We do not have any serious objections to the proposals for Single Family Developments.
Given the lack of visitor EVC requirements in other jurisdictions, it is not clear why they
would be mandated in Maple Ridge. This approach may create issues in the future if
residents park in the visitor stalls to avoid paying for the charging of their electric
vehicles. Stratas may also resist paying for the electricity of EVs – whether they be used
by residents or visitors. For some townhouse projects, there may also be an additional
issue with locating EVC infrastructure in spaces that are not near hydro connections.
For commercial/institutional buildings, the City may want to consults about whether
there should be specific EVC requirements for different types of businesses – rather than
having an overall target of 10%. Each type of business will have a different profile of
employees, visitors and customers.
When the City does adopt EVC requirements, it will be critical that in-stream
development (e.g. rezoning, development permit, subdivision and building permit)
applications be grandfathered. It is difficult for proponents to rework designs and
accommodate added costs later in the development review process.
It would helpful if the Maple Ridge provided information through bulletins or workshops
on incorporating EVC infrastructure in developments to ensure that the City’s
requirements are implemented in the best way possible – especially for strata buildings
and single-family homes. Other local governments have done this and UDI is developing
a workshop this fall on EVC to assist our members on EVC issues that have arisen in
3
developments; how to draft appropriate strata by-laws for EVC; the use of third-party
providers; and other issues/best practices.
Thank you again for consulting the industry regarding Maple Ridge’s proposed EVC
requirements. We support the City’s efforts to incorporate EVC in new buildings. If you have
any questions about our specific recommendations and comments, please do not hesitate to
contact us. We look forward to working with Maple Ridge on this and other initiatives.
Yours truly,
Anne McMullin Bob de Wit
President & CEO CEO
Urban Development Institute Greater Vancouver Home Builders’ Association
Fraser Health Authority 400 – 22470 Dewdney Trunk Rd Tel (604) 476-7000
Health Protection Maple Ridge BC Fax (604) 476-7077
Healthy Built Environment V2X 5Z6 Canada www.fraserhealth.ca
October 10, 2018
Amanda Grochowich
City of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge, British Columbia, V2X 6A9
Dear Ms Grochowich:
RE: ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE: OPTIONS FOR
NEW DEVELOPMENT
Fraser Health appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback into the Electric Vehicle
Charging Infrastructure: Options for New Development document. We recognize the
importance of encouraging the use of electric vehicles to protect both public health and the
environment.
Our feedback is comprised of mainly support for the policy, with the suggestion of allowing for
a portion of each new development to be built without having electrified parking providing a
more equitable range of affordability of the units.
CLEAN AIR
We agree with the statement that there is a significant impact on public health as a result of the
emissions from gasoline and diesel vehicles which contain pollutants, such as volatile organic
compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO). Poor air quality directly
impacts health leading to cardiovascular disease, cancer, strokes, asthma as well as other
respiratory illnesses.1 Therefore, we encourage promoting the use of alternative modes of
transportation, such as the electric vehicle, which result in a reduction of air pollutants being
released into the environment.2 Areas with lower air pollutants promote physical activity by
creating walkable environments which leads to an increase in the health of individuals and the
community as a whole.3
Amanda Grochowich
City of Maple Ridge Page 2 of 3 October 10, 2018
QUIETER COMMUNITIES
We are pleased to see the acknowledgement that the quality of life would be improved as a
result of electric vehicles being quieter than gasoline vehicles. Reducing exposure to noise can
improve an individual’s quality of life by reducing sleep disturbances and fatigue which can
increase an individual’s physical and mental well-being.1
LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
We agree that households would have more disposable income as a result of a lower operating
cost of electrical vehicles, which can benefit both health and the economy. Individuals and
families with more disposable income are able to purchase essentials such as medications and
nutritious foods, which can in turn stimulate local businesses through purchases being made
at local food markets and stores.1
However, requiring every single family development to have at least 1 energized space and all
off-street residential parking in multi-family developments to be energized may have a negative
impact on affordable housing. As there would be an addition al cost to the developer to add
these energized spaces, the overall cost of the build would also be higher, as such this cost
would be passed onto the buyer/tenant thereby increasing the sale and/or rental fees for these
units, which decreases their affordability.4 Having access to affordable housing leads to
residential stability and decreased financial stress, which results in lower rates of domestic
abuse and unintentional injuries, while showing increases in general and mental health of the
population.1 Therefore, considerations should be made to allow for a portion of all new
developments, single and multi-family dwellings, to include homes without the addition of
energized parking. This would allow for a larger range of affordability thereby making access
to affordable housing more equitable, and as such improving the health of the population by
increasing both mental and physical well-being of individuals.1
We appreciate your consideration of our recommendations and look forward to ongoing
communication and collaboration. If you have any question or would like to clarification
regarding Fraser Health’s comments, please contact the undersigned at (604) 476 – 7066.
Sincerely,
Kimberley McLennan, CPHI(C)
Fraser Health
Healthy Built Environment
Amanda Grochowich
City of Maple Ridge Page 3 of 3 October 10, 2018
References:
1. BC Centre for Disease Control. “Healthy Built Environment Linkages Toolkit: making the links
between design, planning and health”, Version 2.0. Vancouver, BC Provincial Health Services
Authority, 2018.
2. Rudolph, L., Harrison, C., Buckley, L. & North, S. (2018). Climate Change, Health, and Equity: A
Guide for Local Health Departments. Oakland, CA
3. and Washington D.C., Public Health Institute and American Public Health Association
4. Marshall, J. D.; Brauer, M. and Frank, L. D. (2009), “Healthy Neighborhoods: Walkability and Air
Pollution”, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 117, No. 11, pp. 1752–1759
5. Litman, Todd, 2009. Parking Requirement Impacts on Housing Affordability. Victoria Transport
Policy Institute, Victoria, Canada.
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7489-2018
A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-
1990 as amended
____________________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend the Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw
No. 4350-1990 as amended:
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No.
7489-2018”.
2.That Bylaw No. 4350-1990 Part 1 Interpretation, Definitions be amended by inserting the
following after “1.2 d)”:
e)Level 2 charging as defined by the SAE International’s J1772 standard;
f)Energized outlet means a connected point in an electrical wiring installation at which
current is taken to supply utilization equipment.
3.That Bylaw No. 4350-1990 Part II General Requirements be amended by deleting “2.3” and
replacing with the following:
2.3 For this bylaw:
a)When calculation of the required number of off-street parking spaces results in a
fractional parking space, one (1) off-street parking space shall be provided to meet the
fractional requirement; and
b)When calculation of the required number of parking spaces to be provided with an
energized outlet capable of providing electric vehicle charging results in a fractional
parking space, one (1) off-street parking space and the corresponding electric vehicle
charging requirement shall be provided to meet the fractional requirement.
4.That “Schedule “F”” is inserted following “Schedule “E””:
1.0 Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Requirements:
1.1 For each:
a)One-family residential, two-family residential, triplex residential, fourplex residential,
courtyard residential, Townhouse and Street Townhouse residential use, a minimum of
one parking space per dwelling unit shall be provided with an energized outlet capable
of providing Level 2 charging;
b)Apartment use, not including Townhouse, in all CD zones as well as in the RM-2, RM-3,
RM-4, RM-5, RM-6, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-5, CS-1, H-1, H-2, and CRM zones, each parking
space provided for residential use, excluding visitor parking spaces, shall be provided
with an energized outlet capable of providing Level 2 charging;
APPENDIX B
c) Apartment and Townhouse use in all CD zones as well as in the RM-1, RM-2, RM-3, RM-
4, RM-5, RM-6, C-1, C-2, C-3, C-5, CS-1, H-1, H-2, and CRM zones, a minimum of 50%
of required visitor parking spaces shall be provided with an energized outlet capable of
providing Level 2 charging;
d) Commercial and institutional uses with 10 or more required off-street parking spaces,
a minimum of 10% of the parking spaces shall each be provided with an energized
charging station capable of providing Level 2 charging.
1.2 Energized outlets and charging stations provided pursuant to Section 1.1 above shall
be installed in conformance with the B.C. Electrical Code.
1.3 Visitor and commercial and institutional use parking spaces provided with energized
outlets and/or charging stations shall be clearly marked “EV Charging Only” and
installed in conformance with the City of Maple Ridge Sign Bylaw No.4653-1992.
5. Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990 as amended is hereby
amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED the day of , 20
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7421-2018
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7421-2018."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 52 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 40879
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1744 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District).
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 30th day of January, 2018.
READ a second time the 13th day of November, 2018.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 4th day of December, 2018.
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1002
228 ST.227B ST.127 AVE.228A ST.127 PLACE228 ST.127 AVE.229 ST.230 ST.BARNSDALE ST.12746
12815
228242299012710
22870227941288512831
12885
22832228022283512753
12787
12793
12737
12797
2290612729
12763
12771
12853
2299212689 2279712710
12822
12756
12719
12832
2285812789
22913229392280312740
12704
12771
12821
12759
12783
12717
12745 2289512750
12861
12749
12778
228722284212703
12709
12678 22877228352284812730 228662281112711
2278612757
228812287112779
2281212733
12776
12850
12796
2286112791/93
12766
2282012798
2281012720
12782 2288612851
12831
22841228652285212727
12779
127722284322761 12844
2283612762 229112286212790
12760
12841 12832
12769
12845
12878
12799
12786
12736
12823
2284712770
12868
2285112861
12747 12735
12835
12677 2284622857228592294822823228192289158
1
D
1
250
53
4
4
17
1
461
B
3
1
60
27
Rem 4
3
59
2
5
4
1 20
34
46
18
40
W 1/2 11
51
57
2
45
55
1
36
8
26
6
11
52
A
38
1328
35
39
54
52
5
2
4
24
54
9
3
43
1
5
48
29
7
47
49
56
25
22
3
28
55
1
LOT A
1219
3
3
23
10
2 4
2
16
4241
2
33
2
56
37
44
C
2
Rem B
21
53
2
5
30
LMP 14909
LMP 22099
P 40879LMP 17860P 14143
P 2711
(P 19054)P 19054
LMP 29025P 10072
P 31436
P 14143
P 22580
LMP 14909 P 19054LMP 14909
LMP 49370
P 19054
LMS 1707P 80046P 22339
P 40879
P 5430P 71336BCP 46084*LMP20286P 19054P 19054
LMP 12700
LMP 49370
LMP 13973
LMS 4188
BCP 46085EP 16963128 AVE.
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
R-1 (Residential District)
7421-20181744
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7509-2018
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014
_______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official
Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "A" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled,
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7509-2018."
2.Appendix D. Temporary Use Permits, Section TEMPORARY USE PERMIT AREA is amended by
the addition of the following:
“TEMPORARY COMMERCIAL USE PERMIT AREA LOCATION No. 7”
Purpose:
To permit a temporary sales centre for a future apartment use.
Location:
Those parcels or tracts of land and premises shown on Temporary Commercial Use Permit
Area Location No. 7 map, and known and described as:
Lot 1 District Lot 401 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan BCP24521
3.Appendix D. Temporary Use Permits, Section TEMPORARY USE PERMIT AREA is amended by
the addition of the attached Temporary Commercial Use Permit Area Location No. 7 map in
sequential numeric order after Temporary Commercial Use Permit Area Location No. 6.
4.Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 16th day of October, 2018.
READ a second time the 13th day of November, 2018.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 4th day of December, 2018.
READ a third time the day of .
ADOPTED the day of .
______________________________ ______________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1003
DATE: Oct 10, 2018
PLANNING DEPARTMENT225 ST.116 AVE.RITCHIE AVE.GILLEY AVE.BRICKWOOD CLOSE227 ST.HOLYROOD AVE.22781
11742
22523
2
2
7
2
92250911657 227341 1 6 4 4
1 1 6 0 9
11662-90
22502225882274611644
11601
11686
11602
11578
1 1 6 3 7
22510 22711-5122528
11698
22514
1 1 6 5 4
22508
11608
1 1 6 4 9
11674
1163811662
22527
1 1 6 2 7
1 1 6 4 3
22789
22514227152
2
7
2
1
2271111650
22791
1 1 6 0 5
2252511668
2271011 6 2 0
22742
22518
1 1 6 2 4
11626
22521
2255522793
22526
22712225041 1 6 3 4
22734
227191 1 6 5 0
11 6 5 5
22516
2
2
7
1
8
2
2
5
3
3
11680
2
2
7
4
51164011631
1 1 6 3 0
11620
22529
11692
225371 1 6 3 8
11614 225562253522795
22531
1 1 6 4 1
2
2
7
3
7
227072250622530
22783
22512
2270311724
22515227262272422520
2 2 5 3 2
2252222515
116302252422548
11656 225341 1 6 2 3
36
2
19
21
5
Rem. 58
37
8
1
2
8
3
42
21
5
4
30
11
4
43
19
14
2
Rem. 23
26
27
17
1
5
9 29
39
24
2
PARK
18
23
13
1
41
PARK
3
19
28
31
14
H
3
2 2220
20
10
5
1
25
21
1
15
11 12
7
17
1
221
18
6
3
740
PARK
A
20
191
4
LOT J
38
18
10
70
6
6
34
2
511
1
16
33
1
13
16
4
6
1
PARK
35
15
12
9
32
2
7
P 18056
B C P 9 2 8 4
NW S 2694 P 72181NWS 2997BCP 9284NW S 3147 BCP 44924LMP 10787P 70416P 4769
*PP087P 57408
LMP 9571
P 63225
P 10091L
MP
5
0
9
9
7
NW S 2316
BCP 8886
LMP 13596P 72462BCP 44924
NW S 2547
LMS 1315
BCP 24521
LMS 1873
P 70416
BCP 22107
10032
NW S 2509
P 48518
P 21553
P 82501
LMP
LMP 50997P 70416BCP 24521
LMP 3942 LMS 618 BCP 9284BCP 22107
LMP 19680
´
Scale: 1:2,500 BY: DT
TEMPORARY COMMERCIALUSE PERMIT AREALocation No.7
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
1100 Committee Reports and Recommendations
1100
- 1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 4, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2016-411-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C o W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7505-2018
21188 Wicklund Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 21188 Wicklund Avenue,
from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-4 (Single Detached (Infill) Urban Residential), a newly
drafted zone, to permit subdivision into two single family residential lots.
The subject application, which previously proposed a rezoning to R-1 (Residential District) to create
two lots, has been deferred twice by Council as it did not comply with Official Community Plan (OCP)
infill policies. A review of OCP Policy 3-19, directed by Council in April 2017, concluded that infill
housing options could be expanded through the creation of a new residential infill zone that permits
a smaller minimum lot area and width than the existing RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential) zone; but is larger than the current R-1 (Residential District) zone; and has a building
height and setbacks that reflect those currently found in established neighbourhoods. As a result of
the infill policy review conducted by staff earlier this year, staff introduced the new R-4 (Single
Detached (Infill) Urban Residential) zone to Council at the November 20 Workshop, and its amending
bylaws received first and second reading at the November 27, 2018 Council meeting.
If approved, one of the two single family lots is subject to a $5,100 charge as part of the Community
Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program Policy 6.31 as updated December 12, 2017. To proceed further
with this application additional information is required as outlined below. Zone Amending Bylaw No.
7505-2018 will allow the subject property to be rezoned to the newly created R-4 (Single Detached
(Infill) Urban Residential) zone.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7505-2018 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule B of the Development
Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Rajinder Chhina
Legal Description: Lot 119 District Lot 242 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan
47383
- 2 -
OCP:
Existing: Urban Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: R-4 (Single Detached (Infill) Urban Residential)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) and RS-1b (One Family
Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
South: Use: Residential
Zone: RG (Group Housing Zone)
Designation: Urban Residential
East: Use: Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
West: Use: Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 969 m² (0.24 acres)
Access: Wicklund Avenue
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
b)Site Characteristics:
The subject property is 969 m² (0.24 acres) in size and is bound by single family residential lots to
the north, west and east, and townhomes to the south. The subject property is flat with a row of
hedges to the rear of the property and a few trees located in the front and rear yards. There is an
existing house on the property that will require removal, as a condition of final reading.
c)Project Description and History:
The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to
R-4 (Single Detached (Infill) Urban Residential), a newly drafted zone, to permit future subdivision
into two single family residential lots not less than 450 m².
Prior to the original development proposal being submitted, staff had a pre-application meeting with
the applicant advising that rezoning to the R-1 (Residential District) zone to create two lots would not
be supportable, based on the infill policies within the OCP. Alternative development options were
discussed, such as duplex or triplex housing, noting these options would achieve similar levels of
compliance with the OCP’s infill policies. The applicant opted to retain the R-1 (Residential District)
zone approach and requested that the subject property proceed to first reading on January 24,
2017, however, staff recommended that the application not be given first reading. Council deferred
the application and suggested that staff work with the applicant to further discuss alternative
development options. Staff met with the applicant and reiterated that duplex and triplex housing
forms were viable development options; however, the applicant decided to keep the original rezoning
- 3 -
request from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-1 (Residential District). The application went
to Council for a second time on April 11, 2017, seeking first reading, but was further deferred with a
recommendation from Council that staff explore implications of allowing subdivision of lots with
areas and widths less than the predominant surrounding zone, as outlined in Policy 3 -19 in the OCP.
A staff report was then presented at Council Workshop on July 17, 2018 titled ‘Neighbourhood
Residential Infill Policy Change’. The outcome of that report, as directed by Council, was that staff
prepare amendments to the OCP and Zoning Bylaw to create a new single family infill zone with a
minimum lot area of 450m² and a minimum lot width of 12m. These Bylaws received first and
second readings at the November 27, 2018 Council Meeting. Under this newly created R-4 (Single
Detached (Infill) Urban Residential) zone, the subject application would satisfy the minimum zoning
requirements, and is supported by staff.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the OCP and
provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made if Council
supports the proposal and once full application packages have been received. A more detailed
analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading, should Council support this
development. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations
and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits.
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The subject property is designated Urban Residential in the Official Community Plan (OCP). The
Neighbourhood Residential designation allows for single detached dwellings and other housing
forms, subject to the Neighbourhood Residential Infill Policies. Specifically, Policy 3-19 provides for
subdivision in established neighbourhoods providing that the lot area and width is not less than 80%
of the lot area and width prescribed under the predominate zone in the neighbourhood.
The application to rezone the property to the new R4 (Single Detached (Infill) Urban Residential)
zone, is compliant with the OCP infill policies and is, therefore, supportable.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 21188 Wicklund Avenue from RS-
1 (One Family Urban Residential), to the newly proposed R-4 (Single Detached (Infill) Urban
Residential) zone (see Appendix C), to permit subdivision into two lots.
The new R-4 (Single Detached (Infill) Urban Residential) zone will be equivalent to 80% of the RS-1b
(One Family (Medium Density) Residential) zone, with a minimum lot area of 450m² and a minimum
lot width of 12 m, consistent with the existing transition between the RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) and RS-1b (One Family (Medium Density) Residential) zones. As well, the new zone
would also address some of the typical concerns raised by neighbours in proximity to an infill
development. As new construction can often maximize the allowable height permitted under the
zoning requirements, the new infill zone would have a lower height maximum of 9.5 m compared to
the typical 11 m to ensure better compatibility with existing (and often smaller) developments. A
maximum height of 9.5 m would still permit a two storey home to be constructed. Additionally, front
yard and side yard setbacks would also be enlarged to reflect RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
zone requirements, so that the siting of the homes is more consistent with existing homes.
- 4 -
The minimum lot size for the current RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone is 668m2, and the
minimum lot size for the newly proposed R-4 (Single Detached (Infill) Urban Residential) zone is
450m2. The subject property does satisfy the minimum zoning requirements of the newly proposed
R-4 zone.
Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance
Permit application.
Advisory Design Panel:
A Form and Character Development Permit is not required because this is a single family project,
therefore this application does not need to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is not required for this application as there are fewer than five
dwelling units being proposed.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a. Engineering Department;
b. Fire Department;
c. Building Department;
d. Parks Department;
e. School District;
f. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; and
g. Canada Post.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
The Engineering Department has advised that as development of this infill option begins, monitoring
of the existing servicing capacity should occur to understand system impacts, and determine the
need for servicing studies. A detailed review of the servicing requirements for the subject property is
anticipated to occur between first and second reading.
f) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended:
1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); and
2. A Subdivision Application.
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
- 5 -
CONCLUSION:
The subject application has previously been deferred at two separate Council Meetings, as it did not
align with Neighbourhood Infill policies within the OCP. Based on earlier direction to staff to review
the City’s OCP infill policies, Council has since directed staff to p repare amendments to the OCP,
Zoning Bylaw, and Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw to create a new single family infill
zone with a minimum lot area of 450 m² and a minimum lot width of 12m. As these amending
bylaws were granted first and second reading at the November 27, 2018 Council meeting, it is,
therefore, recommended that Council grant first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7505-2018,
subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. Any
subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the City of Maple Ridge’s
Approving Officer.
“Original signed by Adam Rieu”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adam Rieu
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Frank Quinn” for
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7505-2018
DATE: Aug 27, 2018
FILE: 2016-411-RZ
21188 WICKLUND AVENUE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY 2017-066-RZ
´
Scale: 1:2,000 BY: LP
Legend
Active Applications (RZ/SD/DP/VP)
APPENDIX A
DATE: Aug 27, 2018
FILE: 2016-411-RZ
21188 WICKLUND AVENUE
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´
Scale: 1:2,000 BY: LP
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7505-2018
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7505-2018."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 119 District Lot 242 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 47383
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1779 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is/are hereby rezoned to R-4 (Single Detached (Infill) Urban
Residential).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of
, 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
FOREST PL.GLENWOOD AVE.212 ST.WICKLUND AVE.
122 AVE.LAITY ST.12069 212202117021097120472114521133211912111112115
2114221160121162111212156
120
2
0
12090
12056
12218
2110221111211582115321137211342113621210121122114612101-5321151
21132211062120721116211072108812098
1211121195
12089
12061 212402117021101211552117821149120502119821103
2119312086
12200
1207321175211882116621139 2124712105
120702116112208
210962117512128
211502108921200211542118921152211472112812070
211232111212217
1211621120
211012109712062
12186
1205012038
1210621211211752112021196/9812145 212822118812138211992111921190/922110212209
2110221241211782114412212
21201212302118512196
21231211462110412203
12081
12209
2116521167211242122112101
12161
12171
21190211612114921127116
12
Rem N 180' E
13
119 120
182
Rem N
1
/
2
4
11
117
377
137
213
153
300
4
6
145
50
146
7
3
Rem 2
152
159
2
350
291
351
10
of S 1/2
Rem 4
289
Rem 1
136
Rem 1
1
163
149
118
294
155 360164
286
4
125
126
358
142
160
3
5
302
295290285 299
2
162
14
6
B
293
154
150
124
3
121
298
1 357
296
161
339
A
173
of 2
172
2
4
181
1
148
2
158
122
5
D
147
1175
1
171 1102
301
C
2
156
288287
359
144
138
292
143
297
2
130
157
6
174
5
1
P 62355
P 46290P 47383
P 53420
P 47383 P 47383P 48094P 53420P 45892P 48995
P 58583
P 48094
P 77954
P 19872
P 48094
EP16285
P 47383
P 47383
BCP 16192P 14112P 15470
BCP 40327
P 67224
P 8790EPP 63666P 48094
(EP 47384)NWS 1462P 7499
P 47517P 48094P 47383
P 74504
NWS 336
P 3460 LMP 39238P 62150EPP 58502RW 18394
EP 53421
LMP 38783
LMP 39636LMP
5
7
6
9LMP 38963LMP 39238EP
5
3
4
2
1
RW 18394
´
SCALE 1:2,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
R-4 (Single Detached (Infill) Urban Residential)
7505-20181779
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 4, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-432-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C o W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7518-2018
20234 Lorne Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On February 27, 2018, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7398-2017 was given first reading to rezone the
subject property, located at 20234 Lorne Avenue, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-1
(Townhouse Residential) to allow for the future development of approximately five townhouse units .
The applicant has since revised their proposal to rezone to the new RT -2 (Ground-Oriented
Residential Infill) zone to allow for a fourplex development. The proposed development includes
eight parking stalls, all of which are in a tandem configuration for each of the four units.
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7349-2017, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7312-2017 for
the RT-2 Zone, and Off Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7350-2017 were given third
reading on September 25, 2018. These bylaws, when adopted, will allow new ground-oriented infill
housing such as courtyard, fourplex and triplex forms in accordance with the action items of the
Housing Action Plan Implementation Framework that were prioritized by Council in September 2015.
The current application applies the draft provisions of the new proposed RT-2 (Ground-Oriented
Residential Infill) zone and Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw for fourplexes.
Pursuant to Council Policy 6.31, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution
charge of approximately $16,400.00 ($4,100.00 per attached ground -oriented dwelling unit). To
proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7398-2017 granted on February 27, 2018 be
rescinded;
2. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7518-2018 be given first reading; and
3. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D, and E of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: A. Paskovic, Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd.
Legal Description: Lot “0”, District Lots 280 and 281, Group 1, New Westminster
District Plan 20003
- 2 -
OCP:
Existing: Low Density Multi-Family
Proposed: Low Density Multi-Family
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential and Vacant
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Low Density Multi-Family
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Low Density Multi-Family
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Low Density Multi-Family
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Low Density Multi-Family
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Fourplex
Site Area: 0.11 ha (0.3 acres)
Access: Lorne Avenue
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
b) Site Characteristics:
The subject property, located at 20234 Lorne Avenue, is located south of the intersection of Lorne
Avenue and Princess Street. There is a single family dwelling on the property which would be
removed to facilitate the proposed fourplex development. The subject property is relatively flat, with
some trees located along the property lines (see Appendices A and B).
c) Project Description:
The applicant originally made an application to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family
Urban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to allow for the future development of
approximately five townhouse units. First reading was granted on February 27, 2018; however
Council did express concerns with the density and character of the development. The applicant has
since revised their application to rezone to the new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) zone for
a fourplex development.
The new RT-2 zone provides for the infill of ground-oriented residential buildings within established
residential neighbourhoods in a form that will be incremental and sensitive to the existing and
emerging context. This new zone allows for dwelling units to be in one building with shared party
walls to create triplexes or fourplexes. These forms should resemble a single family dwelling in order
to fit seamlessly into existing neighbourhoods. Dwelling units may also be arranged individually or
attached and clustered around a shared open space, in a courtyard residential housing form. The
new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) zone was given third reading on September 25, 2018.
- 3 -
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will
need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for
further development permits.
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The subject property is located within the Lower Hammond Precinct of the Hammond Area Plan and
is currently designated Low Density Multi-Family. The Low Density Multi-Family designation permits
townhouse, fourplex and courtyard development forms. The intent of this designation is to
encourage an increase in density and expand the residential form. Consideration of Hammond’s
existing neighbourhood character, including historic building elements and attractive garden spaces
is an important aspect of this designation. Two areas of focus for the Lower Hammond Precinct are:
to maintain the rural character; and to enhance connectivity within the precinct and identify
opportunities to link with other Hammond localities an beyond. The proposed zone is supported by
the land use designation in the Hammond Area Plan.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) (see Appendix C) to permit a fourplex (see
Appendix D). The minimum lot size for the current RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone is 668
m² (7,190 ft²), and the minimum lot size for the proposed RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill)
zone is 850 m² (9,150 ft²) for a fourplex development.
The design of the fourplex is yet to be determined but will be available prior to consideration of
second reading. The attached site plan is conceptual only and is subject to change to be more
consistent with the proposed Ground-Oriented Residential Infill Design Guidelines. It should also be
noted that the current Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990 does not currently allow
tandem parking in the new RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) zone. The Design Guidelines
also require that parking for residents is to be provided in a concealed structure. Should Council
support the current application’s tandem parking arrangement, a text amendment to the current Off
Street Parking Bylaw will be brought forward in the near future. Otherwise, the applicant could be
requested to consider a different design configuration of the fourplex’s units to create more space
on site for double-wide spaces.
This application represents the first proposal to increase residential densities and thus must be done
in a sensitive manner in keeping with the Hammond Area Plan and its Development Permit
Guidelines. Careful review of the proposal and its form is required after first reading. Variations
from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.13 of the OCP, a Hammond Development Permit Area application is required
for this project. The Low Density Multi-Family Designation allows a maximum building height of three
storeys and the following characteristics should be incorporated into the development:
- 4 -
a) A site size and configuration that enables building orientation towards streets and laneways
wherever possible;
b) Careful consideration of size, location, and orientation of on -site open space areas to ensure
new development allows ample sunlight and a variety of plant materials and trees that are
complementary to the existing mature landscaping that contributes to the neighbourhood
character;
c) Design that is sensitive to surrounding built form, particularly for buildings that are three (3)
storeys in height;
d) Parking for residents is provided in a concealed structure.
Advisory Design Panel:
A Hammond Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel
prior to second reading.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is required for this application as it is the first fourplex
development in this area. Prior to second reading the applicant is required to host a Development
Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a) Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
c) Fire Department;
d) Building Department; and
e) Canada Post.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between first and second reading.
f) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended:
1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C);
2. A Hammond Area Development Permit Application (Schedule D); and
3. A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E).
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
- 5 -
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is in compliance with the Hammond Area Plan of the OCP from a land use
perspective, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional
information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. Further revie w is required from a
form and character perspective to ensure the project conforms to the Development Permit
Guidelines for the area, and that variances are minimized.
“Original signed by Michelle Baski”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT, MA
Planner 2
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7518-2018
Appendix D – Proposed Site Plan
DATE: Sep 28, 2017
FILE: 2017-432-RZ
20234 LORNE AVENUE
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WANS
T
E
A
D
S
T.
P
R
I
N
C
E
S
S
S
T
.
P
R
I
N
C
E
S
S
S
T
.
WANS
T
E AD S
T.
C
H
A
R
L
T
O
N
S
T
.
DIT T ON S
T.
LORN
E
A
V
E.
HAMP
T
O
N
S
T.
9
7
2
0
2
3
4
2
0
1
4
1
2
0
3
2
0
2
0
2
8
3
2
0
1
2
6
2
0
2
6
211230 2
0
3
1
0
2
2
0
2
4
0
2
0
2
3
5
2
0
2
2
5
2
0
1
6
4
2
0
2
5
9
2
0
1
9
5
0
2
0
1
9
8 112772
0
2
9
1
2
0
2
5
2
2
0
1
7
0
2
0
3
1
8
12
0
1
6
8
2
0
1
1
9
6
2
0
1
9
9
2
0
2
5
5
2
0
2
0
9
2
0
1
9
9
2
0
1
6
7
2
0
3
0
3
2
0
2
0
3
2
4
2
0
2
0
1
7
4
2
0
3
4
7
2
0
2
1
5
2
0
2
8
9
2
0
1
5
3
2
0
1
4
5
2
0
3
2
3
2
0
1
7
1
2
0
3
0
7
2
0
2
6
5
2
0
2
9
5
2
0
2
2
5
2
0
1
6
7
2
0
2
6
8
2
0
3
3
4
2
0
1
9
6
2
0
1
8
7
2
0
2
6
7
2
0
1
4
7 112592
0
2
1
4
2
0
2
8
2
2
0
3
0
0
2
0
1
7
0
2
0
1
6
0
2
0
1
8
8
2
0
2
7
8
2
0
1
7
8
2
0
1
9
3
2
0
3
1
7
2
0
3
2
4
2
0
1
7
5
2
0
3
3
7
2
0
1
7
3
2
0
3
2
2
2
0
2
4
5
2
0
1
8
2
2
0
1
8
7 111432
0
2
6
7
2
0
2
2
0
2
0
1
5
6
2
0
2
7
4
2
0
2
6
6
2
0
1
7
5 11221112082
0
3
0
1
2
0
2
1
5
2
0
1
9
1
2
0
1
7
5
2
0
2
1
6
2
0
1
2
8
2
0
2
7
5
2
0
2
2
4
2
0
3
3
3
2
0
1
4
8
2
0
1
9
8
2
0
1
3
6
2
0
2
0
5 112142
0
2
8
8
2
0
2
6
7
2
0
2
3
0111852
0
1
5
2
2
0
2
2
5
2
0
3
3
0
2
0
1
8
3
2
4
2
0
1
5
4 11204110982
0
2
1
5
2
0
1
6
0
2
0
3
1
8
2
0
1
6
5
2
0
3
11082
0
2
0
8 112552
0
2
4
0
2
0
1
8
0
2
0
1
6
6
2
0
1
6
9
2
0
2
8
3
2
0
2
8
3
2
0
1
3
5
2
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
0
211241
2
0
3
2
5
2
0
2
3
2
2
0
2
3
1
2
0
2
7
2
2
0
1
2
5
2
0
2
7
7 1122
0
3
3
5
2
0
2
5
0 111842
0
2
6
0
2
0
2
7
5
2
0
1
4
1
2
0
1
3
9
2
0
1
5
8
2
0
2
1
0
2
0
1
4
2
2
0
3
1
5
111602
0
3
0
9
2
0
2
5
9
11144111552
0
2
8
2
2
0
1
6
5
2
0
1
6
2
2
0
1
9
4
2
0
1
5
5
2
0
2
9
0
2
0
1
7
4
2
0
2
7
5
2
0
1
3
8 110962
0
3
1
8
2
0
3
2
0
1
6
3
2
0
2
0
9
2
0
2
3
5
2
0
2
6
2
2
0
1
6
8
2
0
3
2
0
2
3
9112092
0
1
7
1
2
0
2
5
5
0
1
6
3
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,000 BY: PC
APPENDIX A
DATE: Sep 28, 2017
FILE: 2017-432-RZ
20234 LORNE AVENUE
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WANS
T
E
A
D
S
T.
P
R
I
N
C
E
S
S
S
T
.
P
R
I
N
C
E
S
S
S
T
.
WANS
T
E AD S
T.
C
H
A
R
L
T
O
N
S
T
.
DIT T ON S
T.
LORN
E
A
V
E.
HAMP
T
O
N
S
T.
9
7
2
0
2
3
4
2
0
1
4
1
2
0
3
2
0
2
0
2
8
3
2
0
1
2
6
2
0
2
6
211230 2
0
3
1
0
2
2
0
2
4
0
2
0
2
3
5
2
0
2
2
5
2
0
1
6
4
2
0
2
5
9
2
0
1
9
5
0
2
0
1
9
8 112772
0
2
9
1
2
0
2
5
2
2
0
1
7
0
2
0
3
1
8
12
0
1
6
8
2
0
1
1
9
6
2
0
1
9
9
2
0
2
5
5
2
0
2
0
9
2
0
1
9
9
2
0
1
6
7
2
0
3
0
3
2
0
2
0
3
2
4
2
0
2
0
1
7
4
2
0
3
4
7
2
0
2
1
5
2
0
2
8
9
2
0
1
5
3
2
0
1
4
5
2
0
3
2
3
2
0
1
7
1
2
0
3
0
7
2
0
2
6
5
2
0
2
9
5
2
0
2
2
5
2
0
1
6
7
2
0
2
6
8
2
0
3
3
4
2
0
1
9
6
2
0
1
8
7
2
0
2
6
7
2
0
1
4
7 112592
0
2
1
4
2
0
2
8
2
2
0
3
0
0
2
0
1
7
0
2
0
1
6
0
2
0
1
8
8
2
0
2
7
8
2
0
1
7
8
2
0
1
9
3
2
0
3
1
7
2
0
3
2
4
2
0
1
7
5
2
0
3
3
7
2
0
1
7
3
2
0
3
2
2
2
0
2
4
5
2
0
1
8
2
2
0
1
8
7 111432
0
2
6
7
2
0
2
2
0
2
0
1
5
6
2
0
2
7
4
2
0
2
6
6
2
0
1
7
5 11221112082
0
3
0
1
2
0
2
1
5
2
0
1
9
1
2
0
1
7
5
2
0
2
1
6
2
0
1
2
8
2
0
2
7
5
2
0
2
2
4
2
0
3
3
3
2
0
1
4
8
2
0
1
9
8
2
0
1
3
6
2
0
2
0
5 112142
0
2
8
8
2
0
2
6
7
2
0
2
3
0111852
0
1
5
2
2
0
2
2
5
2
0
3
3
0
2
0
1
8
3
2
4
2
0
1
5
4 11204110982
0
2
1
5
2
0
1
6
0
2
0
3
1
8
2
0
1
6
5
2
0
3
11082
0
2
0
8 112552
0
2
4
0
2
0
1
8
0
2
0
1
6
6
2
0
1
6
9
2
0
2
8
3
2
0
2
8
3
2
0
1
3
5
2
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
0
211241
2
0
3
2
5
2
0
2
3
2
2
0
2
3
1
2
0
2
7
2
2
0
1
2
5
2
0
2
7
7 1122
0
3
3
5
2
0
2
5
0 111842
0
2
6
0
2
0
2
7
5
2
0
1
4
1
2
0
1
3
9
2
0
1
5
8
2
0
2
1
0
2
0
1
4
2
2
0
3
1
5
111602
0
3
0
9
2
0
2
5
9
11144111552
0
2
8
2
2
0
1
6
5
2
0
1
6
2
2
0
1
9
4
2
0
1
5
5
2
0
2
9
0
2
0
1
7
4
2
0
2
7
5
2
0
1
3
8 110962
0
3
1
8
2
0
3
2
0
1
6
3
2
0
2
0
9
2
0
2
3
5
2
0
2
6
2
2
0
1
6
8
2
0
3
2
0
2
3
9112092
0
1
7
1
2
0
2
5
5
0
1
6
3
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´
Scale: 1:2,000 BY: PC
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7518-2018
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7518-2018."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot “0” District Lots 280 and 281 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 20003
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1784 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of
, 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
WANSTEAD ST.
P
R
I
N
C
E
S
S
S
T
.
P
R
I
N
C
E
S
S
S
T
.WANSTEAD ST.C
H
A
R
L
T
O
N
S
T
.DITTON ST.LORNE AVE.HAMPTON ST.2
0
2
3
4
2
0
1
4
1
2
0
3
2
0
2
0
2
8
3
2
0
2
6
211230 2
0
3
1
0
2
0
1
5
7
2
0
2
4
0
2
0
2
3
5
2
0
2
2
5
2
0
1
6
4
2
0
2
7
2
2
0
2
5
9
2
0
1
9
5
2
0
1
9
8
2
0
2
5
2
2
0
1
7
0
111722
0
1
6
8
2
0
1
2
6
2
0
1
9
9
2
0
2
5
5
2
0
2
0
9
2
0
1
9
9
2
0
1
6
7
2
0
3
0
3
2
0
3
4
5
2
0
3
2
4
2
0
1
7
4
2
0
3
4
7
2
0
2
8
9
2
0
1
5
3
2
0
1
4
5
2
0
3
2
3
2
0
1
7
1
2
0
3
0
7
2
0
2
6
5
2
0
2
9
5
2
0
2
2
5
2
0
1
6
7
2
0
2
6
8
2
0
3
3
4
2
0
1
9
6
2
0
2
6
7
2
0
1
4
7 112592
0
2
1
4
2
0
2
8
2
2
0
3
0
0
2
0
1
7
0
2
0
1
6
0
2
0
1
8
8
2
0
2
7
8
2
0
1
7
8
2
0
1
9
3
2
0
3
2
4
2
0
1
7
5
2
0
3
3
7
2
0
1
7
3
2
0
3
2
2
2
0
2
4
5
2
0
1
8
2
2
0
1
8
7 111432
0
2
6
7
2
0
1
6
4
2
0
2
2
0
2
0
1
5
6
2
0
2
7
4
2
0
2
6
6
2
0
1
7
5 11221112082
0
3
0
1
2
0
2
1
5
2
0
1
9
1
2
0
1
2
8
2
0
2
7
5
2
0
2
2
4
2
0
3
3
3
2
0
1
4
8
2
0
1
9
8 112142
0
2
8
8
2
0
2
6
7
111852
0
1
5
2
2
0
2
2
5
2
0
1
8
3
2
0
1
5
4 11204110982
0
2
1
5
2
0
1
6
0
2
0
3
1
8
2
0
1
6
5
2
0
3
3
4
110862
0
2
0
8 112552
0
1
8
0
2
0
1
6
6
2
0
1
6
9
2
0
2
8
3
2
0
2
8
3
2
0
1
3
5
2
0
1
5
6
2
0
3
0
2112412
0
2
3
2
2
0
2
3
1
2
0
2
7
2
2
0
1
2
5
2
0
2
7
7
2
0
3
3
5 111842
0
2
6
0
2
0
2
7
5
2
0
1
4
1
2
0
1
3
9
2
0
1
5
8
2
0
2
1
0
2
0
1
4
2
2
0
3
1
5
111602
0
3
0
9
2
0
2
5
9
11144111552
0
2
8
2
2
0
1
6
5
2
0
1
6
2
2
0
1
9
4
2
0
1
5
5
2
0
2
9
0
2
0
1
7
4
2
0
2
7
5
2
0
1
3
8 110962
0
3
1
8
2
0
1
6
3
2
0
2
0
9
2
0
2
3
5
2
0
2
6
2
2
0
1
6
8
2
0
3
6
5
2
0
2
3
9112092
0
1
7
1
2
0
2
5
5
2
0
1
6
3
15
41
7
35
6
2
48
7
18
43
0
20
6
2
35
1
35
9
41
4
49
0
41
8
PARK
42
3
49
8
29
1
40
6
33
3
37
3
26
8
5
20
3
28
7
26
7
42
0
29
3
81
5
36
4
28
8
43
6
1
41
5
27
5
29
0
4
1
48
4
50
3 N 1/2 33013
42
1
3
21
3
36
1
49
6
27
4
48
0
49
7
44
5
36
2
1
2
26
42
8
11
0
4
7
40
9
35
4
42
5
49
5
48
8
6
2
41
2
20
9
33
4
36
0
20
43
5
41
6
Pc
l
.
A
48
3
17
28
4
44
1
54
1
27
1
M
43
2
50
0
49
1
43
4
27
2
43
7
29
4
50
1
49
9
14
11
0
3
P
27
8
35
2
O
27
37
1
21
0
20
8
42
6
49
4
41
9
49
2
28
9
54
2
40
8
42
7
35
8
42
2
19
16
Pcl. A
40
7
43
8
12
4
20
7
27
0
43
9
36
3
42
9
21
4
R
28
6
41
1
E
35
7
20
1
20
4
44
2
36
7
41
3
42
4
35
5
27
3
41
0
11
27
7
33
1
49
3
36
8
81
6
43
1
37
2
54
0
N
37
0
1
43
3
35
3P 114P
7
1
2
0
7
P 114*PP027RP 55932
(114)
P
3
7
6
2
2
*PP028L
M
P
8
8
P 83986P 114*LMP
6
4
2
9
P 20003*PP027L
M
P
8
8 P 114L
M
P
8
8 P 114P 46939P 74952
L
M
P
8
8
P 114P 114P 114P 114P 114L
M
P
8
8
P
1
7
7
1
6P 114L
M
P
8
8
*PP027P 114E
P
2
8
8
3
5
L
M
P
8
8
P 88009P 114*P
P
0
2
9
L
M
P
8
8*PP039P 114P 114LMP 33596LMP 35593´
SCALE 1:2,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill)
7518-20181784
LORNE AVE5'-11" [1.8m]88'-0" [26.8m]5'-11" [1.8m]24'-7 1/2" [7.5m]55'-5" [16.9m]39'-10 3/4" [12.2m]99'-10" [30.4m]119'-11 1/4" [36.6m]26'-7 1/2" [8.1m]55'-5" [16.9m]37'-10 3/4" [11.6m]SITE PLAN1/8" = 1'-0"A1.1PROPERTY INFORMATIONADDRESS: 20234 LORNE AVE, MAPLE RIDGE, BCLEGAL DESCRIPTION: LT 0 NWD, PL NWP20003PID: 008-446-199ZONING INFORMATIONEXISTING ZONING: RS-1 ONE FAMILY URBAN RESIDENTIALPROPOSED ZONING: RT-2 TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTOCP: LDMF - LOW DENSITY MULTI-FAMILYSETBACKS:REQUIRED: PROPOSED:FRONT YARD (NORTH):7.5m (24'-6") 7.5m (24'-6")REAR YARD (SOUTH):7.5M (24'-6") 11.6m (37'-10")SIDE YARD (EAST):1.5m (4'-11") 1.8m (5'-11")SIDE YARD (WEST):1.5m (4'-11") 1.8m (5'-11")CALCULATIONS & STATISTICS:GROSS SITE AREA: 1,114.8 sq.m. / 12,000 sq.ft. (0.275 ac / 0.11 ha)NET SITE AREA: 1,114.8 sq.m. / 12,000 sq.ft. (0.275 ac / 0.11 ha)TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 420.0 sq.m. / 4,521 sq.ft.TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 806.4 sq.m. / 8,680 sq.ft.ALLOWABLE SITE COVERAGE: 45%PROPOSED SITE COVERAGE: 37.7%ALLOWABLE FAR: 0.75PROPOSED FAR: 0.72.3UNITS:TOTAL # OF UNITS: 4 (SIDE-BY-SIDE)EFFICIENCY: 18.2 u.p.a. / 45.5 u.p.ha.OUTDOOR AMENITY:REQUIRED AREA: 4 UNITS X 45 sq.m. = 180 sq.m.PROPOSED AREA:VISITOR PARKING:REQUIRED SPACES:SPACES PROVIDED:ZONING INFORMATION1A1.1SITE PLANSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"TRUENORTHPROJECTNORTHDRAWING NO.PROJECT NO.SHEET TITLE:SCALEDRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE,ARE THE PROPERTY OF APLIN & MARTIN CONSULTANTS LTD, THECOPYRIGHT IN THE SAME BEING RESERVED TO THEM. NOREPRODUCTION IS ALLOWED WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF APLIN& MARTIN CONSULTANTS LTD AND WHEN MADE MUST BEAR ITSNAME. ALL PRINTS TO BE RETURNED.THIS DRAWING MUST NOT BE SCALED. THE CONTRACTOR IS TOVERIFY ALL DRAWING DIMENSIONS AND DATA NOTED HEREIN WITHCONDITIONS ON THE SITE AND IS HELD RESPONSIBLE FORREPORTING DISCREPANCIES TO APLIN & MARTIN CONSULTANTSLTD. THIS DRAWING IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTIONPURPOSES UNTIL SIGNED BY THE CONSULTANT.PROJECT:DATE DESCRIPTIONRV17-541REVISION20234 LORNE AVENUEMAPLE RIDGE, BCTOWNHOUSEDEVELOPMENTREVDRAplin & Martin Consultants Ltd.201 - 12448 82 Avenue, Surrey, B.C. V3W 3E9Tel: (604) 597-9058, Fax: (604) 597-9061Email: general@aplinmartin.comAPPENDIX D
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 4, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2018-381-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C o W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7508-2018
20873 123 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 20873 123 Avenue, from
A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to R-1 (Residential District) for a two-lot subdivision. To proceed further with
this application additional information is required as outlined below. Pursuant to Council policy, this
application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution Program, and will be requested to pay
$5,100.00 per single family lot created. Although the current proposed subdivision is for two lots,
the rezoning would allow for the creation of potentially three lots in the future, therefore the
Community Amenity Contribution Program applies, for an estimated amount of $15,300.00.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7508-2018 be given first reading; and
2. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B and E of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the information required for a
Subdivision application.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: T. Erickson
Legal Description: Parcel “A” (Reference Plan 17273), Except Part in Plan
LMP7016, Lot 3, District Lot 243, Group 1, New Westminster
Land District Plan 3512
OCP:
Existing: Urban Residential
Proposed: Urban Residential
Zoning:
Existing: A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
Proposed: R-1 (Residential District)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
- 2 -
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 0.16 ha (0.4 acres)
Access: 123 Avenue and 208 Street
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
c) Project Description:
The subject property, located at 20873 123 Avenue, is located at the north-east corner of 123
Avenue and 208 Street (see Appendices A and B). The applicant is proposing to rezone the property
from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to R-1 (Residential District) (see Appendix C), to allow for a two-lot
subdivision (see Appendix D). The remaining parcel may be subdivided further in the future but will
remain as a single family lot with the existing home until then.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will
need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for
further development permits.
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The subject property is designated Urban Residential in the Official Community Plan (OCP) and
because it is a corner lot, it has frontage on both 208 Street (which is considered a Local road and
subject to Neighbourhood Infill policies) and 123 Avenue (which is a Major Corridor and is subject to
the Major Corridor Residential Infill policies in the OCP). Major Corridor Infill policies will allow for
building forms such as single detached, duplex, triplex, four-plex, townhouse, apartment and small
lot intensive residential developments. Whereas Neighbourhood Residential Infill policies would
allow for more modest forms of density, such as single detached, duplex, triplex housing forms that
resemble a single family dwelling in appearance.
In instances such as this, it is important to consider the context of the property in relation to the
neighbourhood, which in this case is a predominately single family neighbourhood. Section 3.1.4 of
the OCP contains the Compatibility Criteria which are used to determine the “fit” of a development in
a neighbourhood, with specific attention given to compatibility related to site design, setbacks,
building massing and lot configuration with the existing pattern of development in the
neighbourhood. Based on an assessment of the proposed use against OCP Compatibility Criteria, it
is concluded that the proposed two lot subdivision complies with the Official Community Plan, and is
supportable.
- 3 -
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to R-1
(Residential District) to permit a two-lot subdivision, with potential for a third lot in the future. The
minimum lot size for the current A-2 (Upland Agricultural) zone is 4 ha (10 acres), and the minimum
lot size for the proposed R-1 (Residential District) zone is 371 m2 (3,993 ft²).
Council recently gave first and second reading to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7493 -2018 and Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7504-2018 to implement a new R-4 (Single Detached (infill) Urban Residential)
zone which would have a minimum lot width of 12 m (39.4 ft.) and minimum lot area of 450 m²
(4,844 ft²) specifically for infill development. The intent of this zone is to fill the existing gap in the
range of zones and offer a sensitive transition option for infill development.
Given that this property has frontage on 123 Avenue which is a Major Corridor, the applicant applied
to rezone to the R-1 (Residential District) Zone. While, Council could require this project to advance
using the R-4 (Single Detached (infill) Urban Residential) zone, staff feel that the proposed
application is supportable as it results in R-1 lots with oversized lot area and widths, that are similar
to the requirements of the R-4 (Single Detached (infill) Urban Residential) zone. One issue to
consider however, are the height requirements of the two zones. The R-1 (Residential District) Zone
allows for a height of 11 metres (36.1 feet), whereas the R-4 (Single Detached (infill) Urban
Residential) Zone limits the height of a single detached dwelling to 9.5 metres (3 1.2 feet). Council
may want to consider a similar height restriction to that of the R -4 (Single Detached (infill) Urban
Residential) zone, through a restrictive covenant.
A Development Variance Permit application will be required for the existing home as the required
road dedication and new lot configuration will reduce the front yard setback. This variance can be
supported as it is expected that the property will subdivide further in the future, and either the
existing home will be demolished or the setback will then be considered an exterior side yard
setback and will comply with the Zoning Bylaw.
Development Permits:
A Development Permit is not required for this development for environmental or intensive residential
purposes.
Advisory Design Panel:
As the proposed development is for single family development, a Form and Character Development
Permit is not required and the Advisory Design Panel does not need to review the project.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is not required for this application as there are less than five
units proposed, in accordance with Council Policy 6.20.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a) Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
- 4 -
c)Fire Department;
d)Building Department; and
e)Canada Post.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between first and second reading.
f)Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended:
1.A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B);
2.A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); and
3.A Subdivision Application.
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council
grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second
reading.
The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations
governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must
be approved by the Approving Officer.
“Original signed by Michelle Baski”________________________
Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT, MA
Planner
“Original signed by Christine Carter”________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”_______________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Frank Quinn” for___________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7508-2018
Appendix D – Proposed Subdivision Plan
DATE: Nov 28, 2018
FILE: 2018-381-RZ
20873 123 AVENUE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT208 ST123 AVESKILLEN ST123 AVE
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,000 BY: PC
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River Centreline
APPENDIX A
DATE: Nov 28, 2018
FILE: 2018-381-RZ
20873 123 AVENUE
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^PLANNING DEPARTMENT208 ST123 AVESKILLEN ST123 AVE
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´
Scale: 1:2,000 BY: PC
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7508-2018
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7508-2018."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Parcel “A” (Reference Plan 17273), Except Part in Plan LMP7016, Lot 3 District Lot 243
Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 3512
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1780 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
ALPINE CRES.
KL
A
S
S
E
N
P
L
.SKILLEN ST.209 ST.SKILLEN ST.207A ST.BLANSHARD ST.
124 AVE.
123B AVE.209252087012411
12410
12405
208922088412394 2089212265
12335 2088512415
12390
12375
12270
12260
12227
12305
12290
12258
12254 2088712421
2089612355
12425
1230312400 1231120785
20910209051226120770 20878124161242112439122662071312427 2088212313
12325
1222020828 2087712239
12313
12276 2079720780122672079212430
12385
123602089012369
12443
12220 20878208952089120886208881232320798
12301
12431
12341
12391
12282
123142088320891
12232
123162078820765
12410
208932089912238 2089512400
12431
12277 1235012250
12306
1232212436
2089412312
12291
122382080412406 12401124112088912411
12271 2077912410
12310
12388 2088712390
208852087312420
12399
12334 208742072112242
12255
1230020896
2085412307 2089912250
12228
12221
12430
2088612283 1242612380
12395
2092412370
12308
12228
18
221
4
173
219
235
217
5
4
234
6
30
9
150
138
364
152
6
15
134
172
2
170 PARK
215216
128
241
237
15
165
151
24
126
148
136
Pcl 'A'
129
174 127
19
12
26
143
19
8
149
137
160
176 218
19
51
4
Rem
43Rem E 90' of 2Rem 15
1
156
PARK
147
167
125
23
154
16
169
Rem 14
Rem 19
5
14
2
14
5
7
18
Rem 17
3
Rem 162
PARK
PARK
N 60' 15
164
159
20
17
6
17
39
8
168 157
11
163
161Rem
226
133
166
131
N 60' 14
16
224
239
128
31
1
145
18
175
21
3
236
158
18
1
21
232
225222
135
144
238
132
171
7
20
Rem 16 233
Rem. 50
17
153
127
20
23
13 PARK
231
220
146
10
22
9
240
A
130
10
223
363
155
12
P 16830
*LMP 21167NWS 2038P 16830P 25866
P 19087P 25866
P 49416P 59478
P 62822P 49416P 85548
P 51063
P 16830P 19087EPP 50931 EPP 50932P 17259P 48308
P 59478 P 49416P 17921P 19087P 59478
RP 17273
P 67530
LMP 11657
P 2961P 51063P 39712P 20375*P
P
1
1
8
A
EPP 50932
LMP 6687
LMP 6687
P 59478
EPP 50932LMP 28347
P 65204
LMP 7993
P 23637P 51063P 17259EPP 50931 P 49416LMP 7015
P 49416
EPP 54835LMP 7526
RW 82431EP 46487LMP 7016
EP 66386EP 67161
EP
5
9
4
9
2
RP 65205RW 82433BCP 27186
EP 49424
EP 47468
EP 59492
EP
5
9
4
9
3
EPP 54835EP 46487208 ST.123 AVE.
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
R-1 (Residential District)
7508-20181780
APPENDIX D
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 4, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2018-430-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7520-2018
23717 Fern Crescent and 23689 Fern Crescent
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential), to permit the future development of approximately 33
townhouse units. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as
outlined below.
Portions of the site are influenced by a watercourse and steep slopes that are environmentally
sensitive that will need to be dedicated as park. As a result of detailed ground truthing of the site, an
Official Community Plan (OCP) amendment will be required to amend the land use designations. To
support the proposed RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone an amendment is required to redesignate
those portions of the property that will not be Conservation to Medium/High Density Residential and
Eco Cluster and that property that will not be Medium/High D ensity Residential and Eco Cluster to
Conservation.
Pursuant to Council policy, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC)
Program at a rate of $4,100.00 per townhouse dwelling unit; for an estimated amount of
$135,300.00.
To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the
development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether
consultation is required with specifically:
i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the
case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iv. First Nations;
v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards; and
vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this
matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s
website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and;
- 2 -
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7520-2018 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A,C,D,E,F and G of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the information required for an
Intensive Residential Development Permit and a Subdivision application.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Aplin and Martin Consultants
David Laird
Legal Description: The East Halt of Lot 15 South East Quarter Section 28 Township
12 New Westminister District Plan 2637 and West Half Lot 15
South East Quarter Section 28 Townhsip 12 New Westminister
District Plan 2637.
OCP:
Existing: Conservation, Eco Clusters, and Medium/High Density
Residential
Proposed: Medium/High Density Residential and Eco Cluster to
Conservation
Zoning:
Existing: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Proposed: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Suburban Residential
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Residential)
Designation: Conservation, Low Density Residential, Med/High Density
Residential, Open Space
South: Use: Park
Zone: CS-3 (Recreation Commercial)
Designation: Park
East: Use: Suburban Residential
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Designation: Conservation; Medium/High Density Residential;
Neighbourhood Park; Low Density Urban; and Eco Clusters
West: Use: Suburban Residential
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Residential)
Designation: Conservation and Eco Cluster
Existing Use of Property: Suburban Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Urban Residential
Site Area: 2.025 HA. (5.00 acres)
Access: Fern Crescent
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
- 3 -
b) Site Characteristics:
Located within the Silver Valley Area, the subject properties are outside of the River Village location.
A watercourse traverses the subject properties being located approximately through the centre then
running north along the east edge of the subject properties. There are steep treed slopes that run
from the north west corner to the south east corner. This topography results in an upper bench and
a lower bench conveniently divided by the creek and green slope.
c) Project Description:
The subject properties are located within the Silver Valley Area Plan, and are located outside of the
periphery of River Village and Horse Hamlet. The applicant has applied to rezone the subject
properties to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit two cluster of units (approximately 33). The
unit total may vary as detailed technical information is reviewed. The applicant is proposing to
dedicate the land adjacent to the water course and portions of the steep slopes as park.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will
need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for
further development permits.
d) Planning Analysis:
Silver Valley Area Plan:
The development site is located within the Silver Valley Area Plan and is currently designated
Conservation, Eco Clusters, and Medium/High Desnity Residential. Adjustments to these
designations will be required to accommodate the development and will be detailed in a future
report at second reading.
An amendment to the Official Community Plan is required for the conservation boundary once it has
been determined by a Qualified Environmental Professional.
The Silver Valley Area Plan includes concentrating higher density residential development into the
Hamlets and the River Village. Residential densities located outside of these core areas are to
decline with distance by; clustering or retaining and creating larger lots; retaining significant natural
amenities and protecting view corridors.
The Silver Valley Area Plan land use designations of Eco Cluster and Medium/High Density
Residential support the proposed RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone through the following density
policies:
Policy 5.39 Densities
a) Medium to medium/low densities, ranging from 15 to 40 units per hectare, will be located
advent to schools, commercial uses, and civic uses.
- 4 -
Policy 5.4.6 Densities
a) Densities and housing types should be diversified with and between Eco-Clusters.
c) An Eco-Cluster includes varying levels of density, ranging from 5-15 units per hectare, in the
form of single and/or multi-family units, dependent on proximity to a Hamlet centre, slope
constraints, view impacts, and existing development.
The proposed development under the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone, as presented, complies
with the density policies of the Silver Valley Area Plan.
Planning staff has had preliminary discussions with the Engineering Department with respect to
access; dedication; and road alignment along Fern Crescent and 236 Street. From these
discussions the following preliminary items have been identified:
1. The site design will be required to coordinate with the City’s planned road project along the
frontage;
2. Dedication estimates are:
Large corner cut at the intersection of 236 St and Fern Crescent to allow for roadway re -
alignment;
6m wide dedication along Fern Crescent to achieve 26m arterial ROW width;
Additional dedication at the intersection of Fern Crescent and 130 Ave for to allow for the
proposed roundabout; and
Any dedication on 236 St to be determined upon finalization of roadway design.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 23717 and 23689 Fern
Crescent from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit
approximatley 33 Townhouse units. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will
require a Development Variance Permit application.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to
ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that
meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses.
Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the OCP, a combined Watercourse and Natural Features Development
Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for:
All areas designated Conservation on Schedule “B” or all areas within 50 metres of an
area designated Conservation on Schedule “B”, or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver
Valley Area Plan;
All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 %;
All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural Features Schedule “C”
to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and
for development that is protected from hazardous conditions.
- 5 -
Advisory Design Panel:
A Multi-Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel
prior to Second Reading.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the
applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy
6.20.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a) Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
c) Fire Department;
d) Building Department;
e) Parks Department;
f) School District;
g) Utility companies; and
h) Canada Post.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading.
f) Early and Ongoing Consultation:
In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community
Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early
posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the City’s website, together with an invitation to the
public to comment.
g) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended:
1. An OCP Application (Schedule A);
2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C);
3. A Multi-Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D);
4. A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E);
5. A Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F);
6. A Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G); and
7. A Subdivision Application.
- 6 -
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that Council not require any further additional OCP consultation.
It is expected that once complete information is received, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7520-2018 will
be amended and an OCP Amendment to adjust the Conservation boundary may be required.
The application as proposed is found to meet the overall objectives of the Silver Valley Area Plan and
is consistent with the land use designations of the subject properties with minor conservation
boundary line adjustments. The application compared against the Silver Valley Area Plan can be
supported and therefore, it is recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional
information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading.
“Original signed by Wendy Cooper”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Wendy Cooper, MCIP, RPP
Senior Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Frank Quinn” for
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7520-2018
Appendix D – Concept land use plan
DATE: Oct 22, 2018
FILE: 2018-430-RZ
23689 & 23717 FERN CRESCENT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
2015-155-RZ
2017-367-DP
2017-410-DP2018-408-RZ
2015-373-RZ
2017-367-SD
2015-373-VP
2016-370-DP2015-373-DP
2016-306-DP
´
Scale: 1:2,500 BY: RA
Legend
Stream
Ditch Centreline
Edge of River
Indefinite Creek
River Centreline
River
APPENDIX A
DATE: Oct 22, 2018
FILE: 2018-430-RZ
23689 & 23717 FERN CRESCENT
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´
Scale: 1:2,500 BY: RA
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7520-2018
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7520-2018."
2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
The East Half Of Lot 15 South East Quarter Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster
District Plan2637
West Half Of Lot 15 South East Quarter Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District
Plan2637
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1786 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential).
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are
hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
237A ST.FERN
C
R
E
S
C
E
N
T
237 ST.130 AVE.236 ST.13050
13009
13028
2383013144
13013
13032
13025
13104
13012 238102373323653236412361213029
2371712966 2378823740/237502364713036
13016
13160
13017
13022
12950
13008
2367913002
13040
2368913055
13034
13084
23664/70613033
13003 2383113037
13085
13046
13025
4
14
50
7
SL13 SL18
SL17
12
6
18
34
SL22
1
8
SL19PARK
16
4
1
13
SL12
PARK
35
4 52
3
5
5
SL11
A
SL14
7
PARK
9
44
51
SL20
17
6
Rem 16
PARK
8
53
2
PARK
3
3
SL21
SL16
10
11
19
PARK
A
E 1/2 15
31
12
W 1/2 15
SL15
16
15
11
2
P 7739 P 16555*PP158P 64261P 2637 EPP 34654EPS 1393P 64261EPP56758P 7739
P 53482EPP 49096
P 2637
E
P
P
6
0
5
0
9
EPP 49096P 46207
EPP 18791EPS 1393P 12420
EPP 45834
EP 13725
P 39085EPP 60509RP 13095P1105
P 16555EPP 18791
P 2637
P 43375EPP 62733BCP 44989 EPP 62733EPP 61633 EP 67619EPP 45160EPP 39714EPP 47795EPP 29868
FERN CRESCENT
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
7520-20181786
APPENDIX D
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 4, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2018-444-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: CoW
SUBJECT: First Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7516-2018
21759 River Road
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 21759 River Road, from
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), to
permit future subdivision into two lots. To proceed further with this application additional information
is required as outlined below.
Pursuant to Council policy, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC)
Program, and will be requested to pay $5,100.00 for the additional lot, as the original lot is exempt
when a subdivision is proposing fewer than three lots.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No.7516-2018 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B and E of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the information required for a
Subdivision application.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Pivotal Development Consultants Ltd.
Legal Description: Lot 88 District Lot 247 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan
32510
OCP:
Existing: Urban Residential
Proposed: Urban Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
- 2 -
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) (under application to
rezone to RS-1b, 2018-349-RZ)
Designation: Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 0.13 ha (0.32 acres)
Access: River Road
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
b) Site Characteristics:
The subject property is approximately 0.13 ha (0.37 acres) in area, is generally flat and has trees
located within the front yard and western property boundary. The majority of the subject property is
located within the 100 m Fraser River Escarpment area. The property is bound by single family
residential lots to the west, north and east, with River Road located to the south (see Appendices A
and B).
c) Project Description:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), to permit future subdivision
into two lots, not less than 557 m2. The proposed lot size of 595 m² and 613 m2 will ensure
compatibility with the surrounding neighbourhood and meets the minimum area requirements of the
RS-1b zone. The existing structures on site will be required to be removed as a condition of rezoning.
Access for each lot will be provided from River Road.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will
need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for
further development permits.
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The development site is located in West Maple Ridge, and is currently designated Urban Residential.
This designation permits a range of housing types within the Urban Area Boundary, where infill and
densification may be possible based on compatibility and locational criteria on properties which can
be fully serviced to municipal standards.
- 3 -
The Urban Residential designation consists of two residential categories, Neighbourhood
Residential, and Major Corridor Residential. The subject property is considered a Major Corridor
Residential property, which allows for building forms such as single family, duplex, triplex, four-
plexes, townhouse and apartment, subject to satisfying compatibility criteria in the OCP Figure 4.
These compatibility criteria include respecting and reinforcing the physical patterns and
characteristics of its established neighbourhood.
The subject property is located within the Fraser River Escarpment Area. Policies 6.23 and 6.24 have
been established relating to building construction within the area bounded by 207 Street to the
West, 124 Ave to the North, 224 Street to the East and the top of crest of the Fraser River
Escarpment along the South. When a property is located within the Fraser River Escarpment area,
additional construction, engineering and covenants may apply, depending on the property’s location
within the escarpment. The purpose of these policies is to set out conditions under which subdivision
of, or building on land can be considered within the escarpment area without compromising the
stability of the escarpment, and to have control of surficial and groundwater discharge in the area.
As part of rezoning, connections to the existing storm sewer will be required.
On December 12, 2017 Council amended the city-wide Community Amenity Contribution Program
policy, which permits amenity contributions for residential development throughout Maple Ridge,
including the provision of affordable and special needs housing in a financially sustainable manner.
Each CAC will be based on a contribution rate of $5,100 per single family lot created. For single
family residential subdivisions proposing fewer than three lots, only the original lot is exempt, after
which the CAC program applies to each additional lot.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 21759 River Road from RS-1
(One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit
future subdivision into two lots. The minimum lot size for the current zone is 668m2, and the
minimum lot width is 18 metres. The minimum lot size for the proposed RS-1b (One Family Urban
(Medium Density) Residential) zone is 557 m2 with a minimum lot width of 15 metres. The applicant
is proposing two lots that are just under the 15 m width requirement; therefore, a Development
Variance Permit application is required to vary the width.
Housing Action Plan:
The Housing Action Plan (HAP) was endorsed by Council in September, 2014, and identifies five
goals:
1. To improve housing choice for all current and future households.
2. To encourage the provision of affordable, rental, and special needs housing in Maple Ridge.
3. To increase the opportunity for low income residents and those with unique needs to access
appropriate housing and supports.
4. To raise awareness and increase support for initiatives that improve housing choice and
affordability.
5. To build the capacity of the community to innovate and improve access and opportunity for
affordable housing and housing choice.
This was reaffirmed with the endorsement of the Housing Action Plan Implementation Framework in
September, 2015. While implementing the HAP, a new zone, RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential
Infill), is currently in process to be integrated into the Zoning Bylaw to allow for triplex, fourplex and
courtyard housing forms; while the RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zone is amended to better fit
- 4 -
current standards. Applicants are encouraged by staff to assess the feasibility for these housing
forms on their sites.
Advisory Design Panel:
This application does not need to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel because a Form and
Character Development Permit is not required.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is not required for this application, as there are fewer than five
dwelling units being proposed.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a) Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
c) Fire Department;
d) Building Department;
e) Parks Department;
f) School District;
g) Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; and
h) Canada Post.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between first and second reading.
f) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended:
1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B);
2. A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); and
3. A Subdivision Application.
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
- 5 -
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council
grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second
reading.
The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations
governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must
be approved by the City of Maple Ridge’s Approving Officer.
“Original signed by Adam Rieu”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adam Rieu
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Frank Quinn” for
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7516-2018
Appendix D – Proposed Subdivision Plan
DATE: Oct 29, 2018
FILE: 2018-444-RZ
21759 RIVER RD
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
2015-327-RZ
2017-243-DP
2018-349-RZ
2018-349-VP
2018-349-SD
´
Scale: 1:2,500 BY: RA
Legend
Stream
Ditch Centreline
Edge of River
Indefinite Creek
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX A
DATE: Nov 8, 2018
FILE: 2018-444-RZ
21759 RIVER RD
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´
Scale: 1:2,500 BY: RA
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7516-2018
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7516-2018."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 88 District Lot 247 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 32510
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1782 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is/are hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium
Density) Residential).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of
, 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
RIVER RD.CARR ST.117 AVE.218 ST.117 AVE.2164611753
2169911690
216732166211691
11717
217692164011683
11707
11702
11699
11708
11738
2180521759216372164211754
11762
11750
11737
2185011748
11670
218532164911720
2173321715/192176011729
21821216592177111767
2167821778218012175911714/16
216472169421730217562188511772
21692217212186711762
2174411728
21731217302174511706
11747
11718/20
11662
216952171611696
11712
2177811709
2164321768217832171011741
21808216462186611757
2171321826218411172111713
21746217472167411726
11738
21677SL22
14
186
SL6
2
B
B
78161
5
276
70
17
42
"B"
2
279
Rem
E1/2
6
243
5
10
SL23
83
SL13
SL8
C
74
1
1Rem 2
13
A
3
CP
6
SL10
C
CP
SL151
W1/2
11
SL3
8180
7
4
4
12
Rem
76
SL19
SL9
A
75
SL16
D
160 77
SL21
3
SL5
185 1
SL20
8
1
PCL. A
2
3
2
SL17
785
88
7
71
5
SL4
79
6
73
18
16
164
2
242
SL7 SL18
SL11
7
SL14
1587
SL24
189
2
89
163
82
2
SL12
CANADIAN PACI
FI
C
R
AI
L
W
A
Y
9
241
2PCL. A
187
1
240
90
188
D
278
277
5
*
6
84
244
P 35974
P 20269P 18776
P 6664
P 11112
P 9226BCS 607*PP066
P 7118P 38855P 32510
P 13839P 13839P 32510
P 4213
P32876
P 908 P 12386P 11112
LMP 13219
P 6664
P 33311P 17205 BCS 60713250
(P 84920)
P 12133
P 15184P 32510NWS 1848LMP
*PP075
P 32510 P 13161LMP 3152P 36904 P 12386P 13161P 67720 P 32510P 13429 P 35974P 8950
P 17205P 23996P 77955P 6349
P 4966
P 3068943175 BCP 8450BCPLMP 38267BCP49047
43175
43175EP 7795752239EP 77956BCP
EP 36421
BCP
4
2
8
4
7
BCP 45560
BCP
BCP 44031
BCP
BCP48915
47607
BCP
43175
RP 30988
BCP
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
7516-20181782
APPENDIX D
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 4, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2018-458-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C o W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7522-2018
11310 Kingston Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to M-3 (Business Park). The development proposal is to create a campus style business
park with 7 buildings, habitat restoration, and trail development. The plan includes road dedication
to provide a north-south connecting link between Wharf Street and Kingston Street.
The subject property is designated Maple Meadows Business Park Industrial in the Hammond Area
Plan. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7522-2018 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules (C, D, E, and F) of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: AD Hazelwood Development
Legal Description: Lot 2, District Lot 280, Plan BCP50883
OCP:
Existing: MMBP (Maple Meadows Business Park)
Proposed: Maple Meadows Business Park
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: M-3 (Business Park)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Business Park
Zone: M-3 Business Park
Designation: Maple Meadows Business Park
- 2 -
South: Use: 13 properties, 12 single family, 1 light industrial
Zone: RS-3 One Family Rural Residential and M-2 General Industrial
Designation: Maple Meadows Business Park
East: Use: Single Family
Zone: RS-1 One Family Urban Residential
Designation: Single Family and Compact Residential
West: Use: Vacant (transected by Golden Ears Way)
Zone: RS-3 One Family Rural Residential
Designation: Maple Meadows Business Park
Existing Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: Business Park
Site Area: 16.6 HA. (41.0 acres)
Access: Kingston Street.
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
b) Site Characteristics:
Located in South West Maple Ridge, the irregular shaped subject site (Appendix A) is strategically
located for industrial development. It is situated near the Golden Ears Bridge and is within the 200-
year flood plain of the Fraser River, making it subject to flood construction levels for industrial
development.
Since 2007, there has been interest in developing this site in accordance with its industrial land use
designation. A previous TransLink application for a combined bus fleet overhaul facility and heavy
equipment training facility (RZ/057/07) pertained to the southern part of the subject site.
Preliminary site preparation in support of this work included the placement of a significant amount of
fill. However, this earlier application was withdrawn in 2009.
In 2012, the current property owner applied to rezone the subject property for business park
purposes, but the application (2012-031-RZ) expired prior to receiving final approval. Considerable
work was carried out as the application progressed, including habitat protection measures, multi-
modal trail development, and traffic impact assessments. Road dedication and off site works to
improve local access and alleviate traffic congestion were included in the development details.
The 2017 decision to remove tolls from the Golden Ears Bridge has generated significantly greater
regional traffic volumes than originally anticipated in the previous applications. The applicant has
provided a revised transportation impact assessment in support of this current proposal. The report
identifies transportation options for off site works to attain desired outcomes for local traffic
circulation. This work is currently being reviewed by the Engineering Department.
c) Project Description:
This proposal to rezone the subject site to M-3 (Business Park zone), utilizes a great deal of the work
of the previous expired application 2012-031-RZ. This earlier work involved public input, and
professional consultant services to create a development plan with multi-purpose trails, watercourse
protection measures, stormwater management and road dedication. In addition to providing a
pleasant business park work environment, this development plan aimed to provide multi-faceted
community benefits for the local economy, the enviroment, and neighbourhood connectivity.
- 3 -
This more recent proposal builds on this previous work of habitat restoration and trail development
to create a campus style business park composed of 7 buildings. Five of these structures will be
constructed as multi-tenanted spaces and 2 will be developed as build to suit for specific business
needs. The applicant has provided a design rationale and a preliminary site plan, which are attached
as Appendix C.
The project includes road dedication along the western perimeter of the site, connecting with Wharf
Street to its south, and aligning with Kingston Street to the north of the site.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will
need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for
further development permits.
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The development site is located within the Hammond Area Plan and is designated Maple Meadows
Business Park. The proposed land use aligns well with this designation. There are environmentally
sensitive areas within the site. Although these areas would normally be dedicated as conservation,
an amendment to the Official Community Plan may not be required as these areas may be protected
through a conservation covenant.
Hammond Area Plan:
The Hammond Area Plan recognizes the subject property as key to transportation planning in South
West Maple Ridge and to the regional highway network due to its location near Lougheed Highway
and the Golden Ears Bridge, and states:
When the undeveloped lands to the south of 113b Avenue eventually develop, an alternative
access to the area will be required. This will be particularly beneficial for emergency access.
The Plan also notes the importance of the site for fostering multi-modal transportation options, as
follows:
As the Business Park continues to develop (particularly to the south) and redevelop,
opportunities will be identified for creating linkages, where appropriate, for pedestrian and
bicycle activity.
For these reasons, the applicant has engaged in preliminary meetings with the Planning and
Engineering Departments to ascertain preliminary concerns.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 11310 Kingston Street from RS-3
(One Family Rural Residential) to M-3 (Business Park) to permit Business Park Development. The
minimum lot size for the current RS-3 One Family Rural Residential zone is 8000 m2, and the
minimum lot size for the proposed M-3 (Business Park) zone is 2000 m2. Any variations from the
requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application.
- 4 -
The proposed M-3 (Business Park zone) allows maximum lot coverage of 60% of the site and a
maximum height of buildings to be 15.0 metres. The required front yard setback is 6.0 meters; rear
yard setback is 3.0 meters; exterior side yard setback is 4.5 metres and the interior side yard
setback is 1.5 meters. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a
Development Variance Permit application. This will be determined before the Second Reading report
is brought forth for Council consideration.
Development Permits:
The subject property is within the Hammond Area Plan. Policy 3-38 of the Hammond Area Plan
states the following:
Lands within the Maple Meadows Business Park designation will be subject to existing
policies to regulate Business Parks with the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan.
As outlined in this policy, Section 8.6 of the Official Community Plan will provide the guidelines for
the required Industrial Development Permit application to ensure that the form and character of the
current proposal meets the needs of industry, through attractive design that is compatible with
adjacent development.
Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development
Permit application is also required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and
enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas.
Advisory Design Panel:
An Industrial Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel
prior to Second Reading.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the
applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy
6.20.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a) Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
c) Fire Department;
d) Building Department;
e) Parks Department;
f) Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure;
g) Fisheries & Oceans Canada;
h) Ministry of Environment; and
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
This application has not been formally referred to the Engineering Department for comments at this
time; therefore, a full evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate
that this evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading.
- 5 -
f)Early and Ongoing Consultation:
In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community
Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early
posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the City’s website, together with an invitation to the
public to comment.
g)Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended:
1.A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C);
2.An Industrial Area Development Permit Application (Schedule D);
3.A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E);
4.A Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F);
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council
grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second
Reading.
The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations
governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must
be approved by the City of Maple Ridge’s Approving Officer.
“Original signed by Diana Hall”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Diana Hall, MA, MCIP, RPP
Planner 2
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7522-2018
Appendix D – Design Rationale and Proposed Site Plan
DATE: Nov 6, 2018
FILE: 2018-458-RZ
11310 KINGSTON ST
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
2017-432-RZ
2017-185-RZ
2017-185-SD
2018-245-DP
´
Scale: 1:5,500 BY: RA
Legend
Canal Edge
Ditch Centreline
Edge of River
Edge of Marsh
Canal
Lake or Reservoir
Marsh
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX A
DATE: Nov 6, 2018
FILE: 2018-458-RZ
11310 KINGSTON ST
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´
Scale: 1:5,500 BY: RA
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7522-2018
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7522-2018."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 2 District Lot 280 And 281 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan BCP50883
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1787 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is/are hereby rezoned to M-3 (Business Park).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
20
2
9
7
1101220
1
4
1
20
2
3
4
20
0
3
7
20
3
2
0
20
2
8
320050 11345110022
0
3
0
2
20
1
2
6
20
3
7
9
20
2
7
8
20
2
6
2
11058112302
0
2
0
8
20
1
4
6
20
2
9
8
1123820
0
7
2
20
3
1
0
20
1
2
020172 20
3
7
4
20
2
7
0
20
1
5
7
20
3
7
8
20
1
2
6
20
2
4
0
20
3
1
720198
20
1
2
5
110352
0
2
2
2
20
3
0
8
1104520
1
0
2
20
1
4
6
2
0
3
7
2
20
2
9
5
20
2
8
5
20
0
4
7
20
3
7
0
20
3
7
4
20
0
3
0
20
2
3
5 1127820
0
8
6
20
3
1
7
20
2
2
5
20
1
4
1
20
1
4
3
20
1
6
4
2
0
3
1
8
20
2
4
2
2018420
2
6
6
20
2
2
0
20
2
7
2
20
2
5
9
2
0
3
6
6
20
0
8
9
20
0
7
0
20
1
9
5
11315
20
2
5
2 1105520
1
5
1
20
2
2
0
2
0
3
2
4
20
3
1
1
20
1
9
8 1127720
0
7
1
20
1
1
0
20
2
7
5
20
1
4
7
20128113071127520
2
9
1
20
3
7
7
20
1
8
1
20
2
5
2
1103520
1
7
0
20
3
1
8
1117220
1
6
8
20
1
2
6
20
1
1
9
20
1
6
1
20
1
9
92021020
1
9
9
20
2
5
5
20
2
0
9
20
1
6
7 112521128020
1
4
7
20
3
0
3
20
3
4
5
20
0
6
7
20
2
6
8
2
0
2
7
2
20
1
4
3
1102520
0
8
3
20
0
7
0
20
3
2
4
20
1
6
8 1124820
3
2
0
20
3
2
4
20
1
7
4
20
0
9
1
20
2
9
8
20
3
4
7
20
0
7
3
20
2
1
5
20
0
9
1
20
2
8
9
20
1
3
7
1096020
1
5
3
20
1
4
5
201122001520
1
0
6
20
3
2
3
20
1
7
1
20
2
6
5
20
3
0
7
20
2
9
5
20
1
1
1
20
2
9
1
20
2
2
5
20
1
6
7
20
2
3
6
20
3
8
4
20
2
6
8
20
0
5
0
20
1
9
9
20
3
7
1
20
1
8
3
20
1
8
7
20
3
3
4
20
1
9
6
20
2
6
7
20
1
4
7 11259200701113820
3
6
8
20
1
8
0
20
2
1
4
2
0
2
1
8
20
3
3
4
20
2
8
2
2
0
3
5
4
20
1
2
8
20
1
6
2
2
0
3
4
0
20
0
5
5
20
3
0
0
20
1
8
0
20
2
4
6
20
1
7
0
20
1
6
0
20
1
8
820142
20
0
8
8 1124720
2
7
8
20
1
7
8
20
2
7
6
20
2
4
9
2
0
3
3
6
20
1
9
3
1998220
2
8
0
20
3
3
0
20
2
7
3
20
3
1
7
20
2
6
1
20
3
2
4
20
2
0
9
20
1
1
3
20
2
1
0
20
1
7
5
20
3
3
7
201942
0
2
5
8
20
1
7
3
20
1
1
8
20
1
0
1
20
1
3
6
2
0
3
0
6
20
3
2
2
20
2
4
5
2001220
3
8
0
20
3
5
0
20
2
6
3
20
1
8
2
20
3
4
2
20
0
9
8
20
2
9
1
20
3
6
6
2013220
1
1
5
20
0
8
0
/6820
0
4
3
20
1
8
7 1114311019
20
2
6
7
20
1
6
4
20
2
2
0
20
0
9
8
20
3
7
81135011348
20
1
4
8
20
1
5
6
20
1
3
8
20
2
7
4
20
2
6
6
2016220
1
7
5 1122120
1
3
7
20
1
7
02006620
1
2
7
20
2
4
7 1120820
0
5
8
20
3
0
1
20
2
1
5 1133620
2
2
1
20
1
9
1
20
1
7
5
20
2
1
6
20
3
7
7
20
1
3
0
20
1
0
7
20
1
2
8
20
1
8
8
20
3
6
7
20
2
7
5
2007620
3
1
1
20
4
2
1
20
0
8
5
20
0
8
0
2004820
3
7
5
20
1
2
1
20
2
2
4 1133220
3
3
3
1101120
1
3
9
20
2
3
5
20
4
2
7
20
3
9
5
20
3
7
7
20
1
4
8
20
1
6
3
20
1
9
8
20
2
8
1
2015220
1
9
2
20
1
3
6
20
1
4
5
20
2
0
5 112141101220
2
8
8
20
2
5
0
20
2
6
7
20
3
8
3
20
2
6
7
20
3
5
9
20
1
2
7
20
3
6
3
20
2
3
011185
1104520
1
5
2
2
0
2
4
6
20
2
2
5
20
3
3
0
1100920
1
8
3
20
3
2
4
20
2
3
4
20
1
5
4
110981120420
2
9
9
20
3
8
7
20
2
1
5
20
1
5
9
20
1
6
0
20
1
6
0
20
3
2
5
20
2
2
9
20
0
8
1
20
1
5
6
20
1
1
6
20
2
3
9
20
1
6
5
20
3
1
8 1131020
3
3
4
20
3
8
2
20
1
9
3 1108620
2
0
8
2
0
3
6
21125520
2
4
0
20
1
8
0
20
3
4
0
20
2
8
6
20
0
9
2
20
0
7
1
20
0
4
0
20
1
6
6 112392
0
3
7
6
20
1
6
1
20
1
6
9
20
1
3
2
20
2
0
7
20
2
8
3
1112520
2
8
3
1101520
1
5
7
1111020
3
0
1
111502
0
2
8
2
20
1
7
6
1996620
2
5
5
20
3
8
7
1101020
1
3
5
20
1
5
6
20
3
5
3
20
3
0
2
20
1
2
6 1124120
3
9
3
20
3
2
5
20
2
3
1
20
2
3
2
20
1
5
2
20
2
7
2
20
2
2
0
20
3
6
6
11310
20
1
8
7
20
2
9
6
20
1
0
4
20
1
5
6
20
1
2
5
20
0
7
9
201182017020
2
7
7
20
2
8
4
1100420
1
1
7 1129120
3
3
5
20
2
2
7
20
2
5
0 1118420
2
6
0
20
1
5
3
20
2
7
5
11393
20
3
1
0
20
1
6
0
20
2
4
3
20
2
7
5
20
3
0
1
20
2
5
5
11378
20
3
9
6
20
1
4
1
20
0
9
2
20
1
3
9 2018620
1
5
8
2
0
2
9
4
20
2
5
3
20
2
2
6
20
3
1
0
20
2
1
0
2002820
2
1
7
2007220
1
8
9
20
2
3
3
20
3
7
5
20
3
3
3
20
1
4
220060
20
2
6
4
20
3
1
6
20
1
0
7
20
2
5
8
20
3
1
5
2
0
3
4
6
20
0
6
5 1116020
1
1
7
2012620
1
3
8
20
3
0
9
2
0
3
8
0
20
3
7
1
20
2
5
9
11144201741115520
3
6
8
20
3
7
0
20
0
7
7
20
2
8
2
20
3
8
4
20
1
6
5
20
1
6
2 1115820
1
9
4
20
1
0
1
20
0
9
7
20
1
5
5
20
2
9
020124
20
1
7
4
20
0
8
2
20
2
0
0
20
1
1
0
20
3
6
1 1133520
1
3
8
20
2
7
5 113581109620
3
1
8
110782
0
2
1
6
20
1
3
5
20
3
0
9
20
1
6
3
20
3
6
5
20
2
0
9
20
2
3
5
20
3
6
8
20
2
7
6
20
2
2
0 1133420
2
8
5
20
2
6
2
20
1
6
8
20
0
9
4
20
2
6
7 1132520
0
6
0
2
0
2
5
0
20
3
6
5
20
3
6
1
20
0
5
9
20
2
3
91120920
2
0
5
20
0
9
7
20
2
5
5
20
1
7
1
2
0
3
1
4
20
1
6
3
1121820
2
1
9
24
9
24
7
8
15
41
7
58
55
1
25
9
1
Pc
l
.
'
5
'
26
3
35
6
39
1
40
3
2
23
1
48
5
22
6
48
7
25
23
7
18
52
7
23
2
28
37
9
30
0
45
0
43
0
20
6
41
2
35
1
35
9
78
65
49
0
41
4
Pc
l
.
B
Pcl. A
A
A
41
8
89
19
3
25
PARK
44
22
9
42
3
49
8
97
Pcl. 2
29
1
47
7
Rem 8
19
9
2
10
21
2
11
4
44
3
47
1
29
8
52
1
40
6
11
3
37
3
26
8
55
0
33
3
38
5
5
12
2
Pc
l
.
'
1
8
'
10
20
3
38
6
53
9
26
7
28
7
37
5
42
0
T
52
6
53
3
25
3
22
8
22
3
11
5
81
5
29
3
53
8
59
45
6
39
3
36
4
22
7
28
8
Pcl. 1
24
5 S
43
6
Rem
52
30
3
4
1
21
9
56
61
41
5
27
5
29
0
4
35
84
3
1131
1
48
4
12
1
51
6
50
3
19
8
95
N 1/2 330
34
Pcl.'7'
55
4
13
51
1
44
4
52
8
42
1
Pcl.'2'
Pc
l
.
'
1
5
'
37
4
32
5
55
6
26
5
10
8
51
0
50
2
85
3
21
3
36
1
49
6
54
8
Pcl.'3'
27
4
46
0
55
7
52
2
48
0
49
7
21
7
24
3
44
5
43
55
8
36
2
21
1
2
1
40
1
26
Pcl. 3
10
7
Pc
l
.
'
1
4
'
42
8
11
0
4
57
22
0
A
48
45
3
9
24
8
7
Pc
l
.
'
1
3
'
40
9
54
7
35
4
42
5
1
49
5
19
7
30
5
48
8
24
1
Pc
l
.
A
38
2
23
0
68
24
42
6
Lot 1
60
72
25
4
25
5
Pc
l
.
'
6
'
44
9
10
0
2
55
9
41
2
Pcl.'1'
20
9
19
4
37
6
46
9
55
5
Pc
l
.
'
1
6
'
45
7
33
4
13
36
0
30
2
39
4
21
8
32
2
46
6
3
20
45
2
43
5 56741
6
Pc
l
.
A
31
48
3
1
17
Pc
l
.
'
1
0
'
29
7
51
3
24
6
23
5
28
4
44
1
2
54
1
27
1
532
M
90
50
6
26
47
5
36
46
2
53
1
54
9
46
B
43
2
12
2
47
8
A
53
5
1
46
1
50
2
45
40
4
24
0
48
2
46
5
23
8
26
2
50
0
49
1
43
4
84
8
10
4
45
1
Pcl.'4'
13
1
27
2
43
7
25
6
50
8
50
4 56939
9
22
5
50
1
29
4
49
9
14
24
Pc
l
.
'
1
7
'
11
0
3
37
8
P
53
2
27
8
98
44
6
39
8
35
2
52
3
10
5
5
G
32
1
Pcl.'8'
33
O
27
53
0
38
1
37
1 56421
0
20
8
R
23
2
42
6
51
2
49
4
41
9 56351
7
49
2
53
7
28
9
4
54
2
47
2
96
40
8
46
8
99
11 56850
7
30
1
21
Pc
l
.
'
9
'
42
7
B
35
8
39
0
21
6
42
2
19
46
7
533
1
8652
9
39
7
16
26
1
Pcl. A
20
0
Q
40
7
23
6
9
51
55
2
43
8
12
6
55
40
0
4
20
7
37
7
27
0
Pc
l
.
'
1
2
'
43
9
25
8
3
36
3
52
0
42
9
849
53
6
47
6
47
0
10
3
Pcl. 1
29
24
2
26
6
23
38
7
22
4
27
54
6
21
4
23
4
R
28
6
46
4
38
0
25
2
41
1
E
45
8
35
7
A
20
1
A
54
3 56519
6
30
25
7
20
4
44
0
55
3
35
53
A
38
3
12
0
51
9
25
0
1
31
8
46
3
48
1
47
4
22
22
2
44
2
24
4
39
2
36
7
22
1
54
41
3 56642
4
10
6
45
5
531
B
35
5
Pc
l
.
'
1
1
'
2
25
1
49
79
38
4
26
4
47
3
27
3
28
51
5
A
51
4
47
21
5
52
4
52
5
50
9
53
4
11
41
0
23
3
54
4
32
51
8
27
7
33
1
49
3
47
9
26
9
30
4
36
8
54
5
81
6
43
1
38
8
23
9
84
50
5
37
2
54
0
45
4
26
0
45
9
39
5
N
39
6
37
0
1
38
9
1
43
3
35
3
P 114
*PP043
P 114
LMP 4420
5
P 114
P 114
P 114*PP031 (114)
P
7
1
2
0
7
P 62771
P 114
P 35482 LMP 31249
LMP 25176
P 4183*PP030
P 114*LMP 24176
P 114*PP027
BCP 23657
LM
P
8
8
LM
P
8
8
RP 55932
P 114*PP031
P 114*PP040
P 114
(114)
P
3
7
6
2
2
*PP028
P 114
LM
P
8
8
P 83986
P 114
*PP033
P 114
P 37901
*L
M
P
6
4
2
9
*L
M
P
2
4
1
7
6
P 20003(114)*PP027
*P
P
0
3
6
LM
P
8
8
P 114
LMS 2889
*P
P
0
3
5
LM
P
8
8
P 114
LM
P
8
8BCP 45137P 114
BCP 1636
8
*LMP 20289P 114
P 114
P 114
*L
M
P
1
1
5
7
3
P 46939
P 114
P 114
P 74952
LM
P
8
8
P 86659
P 114
P 114
LM
P
8
8
P 114*PP 040
P
8
4
2
2
*PP034
P 114
LM
P
8
8
*LMP 34591*PP041 P 114
P 114*LMP 34591LMP 44205
P 114
P 114
P 114P 86659LM
P
8
8
P 114
P
2
0
2
6
5
P 114
BCP 32752
P 114
P 114
P 114
BCP 50883
LM
P
8
8
P
1
7
7
1
6
RP 63014
*P
P
0
3
7
P 114
LM
P
8
8
*
LM
P
1
6
8
2
9
P 114
*P
P
0
3
2
*PP027
P 114
P 4183
P 114EP 21614E
P
2
8
8
3
5
LM
P
8
8
P 114LMP 52360
*
P
P
0
4
2
P
7
0
1
0
5
P
4
1
0
7
1
P 88009
P 4183
LMP 25175
P 114
P 114*PP031
LM
P
8
8
P 114
P 114
P 4183
P 9487*LMP 20289
BCP 28541
*P
P
0
2
9
LM
P
8
8
*LMP8672BCP 50883
LM
P
8
8
P 114
*L
M
P
1
1
5
7
3
LM
P
8
8*PP039
P 114(114)*PP 042
LM
P
4
4
2
0
5
EPP 42698
P 114
H
A
Z
E
LW
O
O
D
S
T
.OSPRING ST.LORNE AVE.WANSTEAD ST.HAMPTON ST.DITTON ST.CHIGWELL ST.KENT ST.WHARF S
T
.
KI
N
G
S
T
O
N
S
T
.
P
R
I
N
C
E
S
S
S
T
.KINGSTON ST.´
SCALE 1:6,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
1787RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
M-3 (Business Park)
7522-2018
City of Pitt Meadows
APPENDIX D
06-2240-20 Page 1 of 2
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 4, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 11-5245-20-2012-119
06-2240-20 & 11-5245-20-1156
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COW
SUBJECT: Latecomer Agreement LC 162/18
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The lands at 24086 and 24108 104 Avenue are currently under development. Part of the
development servicing is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local
Government Act that benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC 162/18 provides the
municipality’s assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or extended servicing to the
benefiting lands.
The developers have the opportunity to recover costs for service capacity over and above that
required for their specific development should development occur on those parcels identified in
Schedule A. Cost recovery may also be possible where a property connects to the Latecomer-eligible
utility.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the cost to provide the excess or extended services at 24086 and 24108 104 Avenue is, in
whole or in part, excessive to the municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall be
paid by the owners of the land being developed; and
That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or extended services on the parcels and in the
amounts as set out in Schedule A; and further
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Latecomer Agreement LC 162/18 with the
developers of the lands at 24086 and 24108 104 Avenue.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The lands at 24086 and 24108 104 Avenue are currently under development. Part of the
development servicing is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with
the Local Government Act that benefits adjacent properties. The attached map identifies the
lands which are involved in the development and those which will benefit from the excess or
extended services. The cost breakdown for each excess or extended service is shown on
attached Schedule A.
In addition, a copy of Latecomer Agreement LC 162/18 is also attached for information
purposes.
06-2240-20 Page 2 of 2
b) Policy Implications:
Part 14, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all or
part of the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality shall determine the
proportion of the cost of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and
determine the proportion of the cost of the service to be attributed to parcels of land which
the municipality considers will benefit from the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 162/18
will provide such determination.
CONCLUSION:
A developer has provided certain services in support of the development of lands at 24086 and
24108 104 Avenue. Some of the services benefit adjacent lands therefore, it is appropriate to
impose Latecomer Charges on the benefitting lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 162/18 summarizes
the municipality’s determination of benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the
term over which such Latecomer Charges will be applied.
“Original signed by Mike Canning”
Prepared by: Mike Canning, PEng.
Manager of Infrastructure Development
“Original signed by David Pollock”
Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng.
Municipal Engineer
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
General Manager Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachments:
(A) Schedule A
(B) Benefitting Property Map
(C) Latecomer Agreement
Schedule A
TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE
1. EXTENDED NOMINAL SERVICE
Service Total Number of
Equivalent
Development
Units
(EDU)
Total Cost Of
Benefit
Cost Per
EDU
EDU’s On
Benefiting
Property
Benefit
Attributed
By Property
Excluding
Development
Road 520
$212,558.00 $408.77 14
Rem. Lot 7, P14750
RN 84325-0100-1
1 x $5,723.00
25 Lot 8, P14750
RN 84325-0200-5
1 x $10,219.00
157 Lot 1, EPP80804
RN 84323-1001-0
1 x $64,176.00
64 Lot 2, EPP80804
RN 84323-1002-0
1 x $26,161.00
17 Rem Lot D, RP7139
RN 84307-0000-6
1 x $6,949.00
42 Lot B, P13554
RN 84310-0000-4
1 x $17,168.00
45 Lot K, P20434
RN 84306-0200-8
1 x $18,394.00
28 Lot C, P14864
RN 84312-0100-9
1 x $11,446.00
Storm
Sewer
219 $54,554.00 $249.11 31 Lot 2, EPP80804
RN 84323-1002-0
1 x $7,722.00
A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows:
Lot A, Section 10,Township 12, NWP 22743
RN 84325-0101-3
$8,090.00
Rem Lot 7, Sec. 10, Twp 12, NWP 14750
RN 84325-0100-1
$18,984.00
Lot 8, Sec. 10, Twp 12, NWP 14750
RN 84325-0200-5
$15,838.00
Lot 1, Sec. 10, Twp 12, EPP 80804
RN 84323-1001-0
$97,440.00
Lot 2, Sec. 10, Twp 12, EPP 80804
RN 84323-1002-0
$33,883.00
Service Total Number of
Equivalent
Development
Units
(EDU)
Total Cost Of
Benefit
Cost Per
EDU
EDU’s On
Benefiting
Property
Benefit
Attributed
By Property
Excluding
Development
Watermain 536 $120,471.00 $224.76 36 Lot A, P22743
RN 84325-0101-3
1 x $8,090.00
59 Rem. Lot 7, P14750
RN 84325-0100-1
1 x $13,261.00
25 Lot 8, P14750
RN 84325-0200-5
1 x $5,619.00
148 Lot 1, EPP80804
RN 84323-1001-0
1 x $33,264.00
30 Lot A, P21769
RN 84307-0200-3
1 x $6,743.00
18 Lot B, P21769
RN 84307-0300-7
1 x $4,046.00
49 Rem Lot D, RP7139
RN 84307-0000-6
1 x $11,013.00
43 Lot B, P13554
RN 84310-0000-4
1 x $9,665.00
Lot A, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 21769
RN 84307-0200-3
$6,743.00
Lot B, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 21769
RN 84307-0300-7
$4,046.00
Rem Lot D, RP7139, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWD
RN 84307-0000-6
$17,962.00
Lot B, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 13554
RN 84310-0000-4
$26,833.00
Lot K, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 20434
RN 84306-0200-8
$18,394.00
Lot C, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 14864
RN 84312-0100-9
$11,446.00
Page 1 of 4
LATECOMER AGREEMENT
LC 162/18
THIS AGREEMENT made the day of , 2018
BETWEEN: Homestead Developments Ltd. and Nordel Homes Ltd.
6377 188 Street 701-17665 66A Avenue
Surrey BC V3S 7T9 Surrey BC V3S 2A7
(Hereinafter called the “Developers”)
OF THE FIRST PART
AND: City of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge BC V2X 6A9
(Hereinafter called the “City”)
OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS:
A. The Developers have developed certain lands and premises located within the City of
Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more particularly known and
described as:
Lot 7, Section 3, Township 12, NWP 11176 New Westminster District and
Lot A, Section 3, Township 12, EPP 49494, New Westminster District
(Hereinafter called the “said lands”);
B. In order to facilitate the approval of the development of the said lands, the
Developers have constructed and installed the road, storm sewer and watermain
shown on the design prepared by D.K. Bowins & Associates Inc., dated May 2014,
sheets 1 to 14 and marked “Reviewed as Noted” by the Municipality on December 8,
2015.
Maple Ridge Project No. 5245-20-1156 and 5245-20-2012-119.
(Hereinafter called the “Extended Services”);
C. The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands
and other than the said lands;
D. The City considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive;
E. The Developers have provided the Extended Services in the Amount of $387,583.00.
Page 2 of 4
F. The City has determined that:
Lot A, Section 10, Twp 12, NWP 22743
Rem Lot 7, Sec. 10, Twp 12, NWP 14750
Lot 8, Sec. 10, Twp 12, NWP 14750
Lot 1, Sec. 10, Twp 12, EPP 80804
Lot 2, Sec. 10, Twp 12, EPP 80804
Lot A, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 21769
Lot B, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 21769
Rem Lot D, RP7139, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWD
Lot B, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 13554
Lot K, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 20434
Lot C, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 14864
(the “Benefitting Lands”) will benefit from the Extended Services;
G. The City has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands connecting
to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the “Latecomer Charge”) on the
Benefitting Lands in the following amounts:
Lot A, Section 10,Twp 12, NWP 22743
RN 84325-0101-3
• $8,090.00 for use of the watermain on 104 Avenue
Rem Lot 7, Sec. 10, Twp 12, NWP 14750
RN 84325-0100-1
• $5,723.00 for use of the road on 104 Avenue other than for access to the
existing single-family dwelling
• $13,261 for use of the watermain on 104 Avenue other than the existing
single-family house connection
Lot 8, Sec. 10, Twp 12, NWP 14750
RN 84325-0200-5
• $10,219.00 for use of the road on 104 Avenue other than for access to the
existing single-family dwelling
• $5,619.00 for use of the watermain on 104 Avenue other than the existing
single-family house connection
Lot 1, Sec. 10, Twp 12, EPP 80804
RN 84323-1001-0
• $64,176.00 for use of the road on 104 Avenue
• $33,264.00 for use of the watermain on 104 Avenue
Lot 2, Sec. 10, Twp 12, EPP 80804
RN 84323-1002-0
• $26,161.00 for use of the road on 104 Avenue
• $7,722.00 for use of the storm sewer on 104 Avenue
Lot A, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 21769
RN 84307-0200-3
• $6,743.00 for use of the watermain on 104 Avenue
Page 3 of 4
Lot B, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 21769
RN 84307-0300-7
• $4,046.00 for use of the watermain on 104 Avenue
Rem Lot D, RP7139, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWD
RN 84307-0000-6
• $6,949.00 for use of the road on 104 Avenue
• $11,013.00 for use of the watermain on 104 Avenue
Lot B, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 13554
RN 84310-0000-4
• $17,168.00 for use of the road on 104 Avenue
• $9,665.00 for use of the watermain on 104 Avenue
Lot K, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 20434
RN 84306-0200-8
• $18,394.00 for use of the road on 104 Avenue other than for access to the
existing single family dwelling
Lot C, Sec. 3, Twp 12, NWP 14864
RN 84312-0100-9
• $11,446.00 for use of the road on 104 Avenue other than for access to the
existing single family dwelling
plus interest calculated annually from the date of completion of the Extended
Services as certified by the General Manager Public Works & Development Services
of the City (the “Completion Date”) to the date of connection of the Benefitting Lands
to the Extended Services;
H. The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and
collected by the City shall pursuant to Section 508 (2) of the Local Government Act
R.S.B.C. 2015, c.1 be paid to the Developers as provided for in this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 505 (5) of the Local Government Act
R.S.B.C 2015, c.1, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and
collected by the City within fifteen (15) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to
the Developers and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of the next
June 30th or December 31st that follows the date on which the Latecomer Charge was
collected by the City.
2. This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any
purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer Charge by the City to the
Developers, or fifteen (15) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the City
shall be forever fully released and wholly discharged from any and all liability and
obligations herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer Charge, and
whether arising before or after the expiry of this Agreement.
Page 4 of 4
3. The Developers represent and warrant to the City that the Developers have
not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from
the owner of the Benefitting Lands for the provision, or expectation of the provision of
the Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein; and
further represent and warrant that they have not entered into any agreement with the
owner of the Benefitting Lands for consideration in any way related to or connected
directly or indirectly with the provision of the Extended Services. The representations
and warranties of the Developers herein shall, notwithstanding Item 2 of this
Agreement, survive the expiry of this Agreement.
4. The Developers (if more than one corporate body or person) hereby agree
that the City shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in
equal shares.
5. If the Developer is a sole corporate body or person, the City shall remit the
Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the
following (name and address of director of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.):
6. In the event that the Developer is not the owner of the said lands, the owner
shall hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto the Developer, his heirs and
assigns, all rights, title and interest under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective Corporate
Seals, attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf, the
day and year first above written.
DEVELOPER
Developer - Authorized Signatory
Developer - Authorized Signatory
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
Corporate Officer - Authorized Signatory
06-2240-20 Page 1 of 2
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 4. 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 11-5245-2013-086
06-2240-20 & 11-5245-2017-169
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COW
SUBJECT: Latecomer Agreement LC 163/18
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The lands at 13660, 13702 and 13738 232 Street have been subdivided. Part of the subdivision
servicing is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local Government
Act that benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC 163/18 provides the municipality’s
assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or extended servicing to the benefiting
lands.
The developers have the opportunity to recover costs for service capacity over and above that
required for their specific development should development occur on those parcels identified in
Schedule A. Cost recovery may also be possible where a property connects to the Latecomer-eligible
utility.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the cost to provide the excess or extended services at 13660, 13702 and 13738 232 Street
is, in whole or in part, excessive to the municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall
be paid by the owners of the land being subdivided; and
That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or extended services on the parcels and in the
amounts as set out in Schedule A; and further
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Latecomer Agreement LC 163/18 with the
subdivider of the lands at 13660, 13702 and 13738 232 Street .
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The lands at 13660, 13702 and 13738 232 Street have been subdivided. Part of the
subdivision servicing is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the
Local Government Act that benefits adjacent properties. The attached map identifies the
lands which are involved in the subdivision and those which will benefit from the excess or
extended services. The cost breakdown for each excess or extended service is shown on
attached Schedule A.
In addition, a copy Latecomer Agreement LC 163/18 is also attached for information
purposes.
06-2240-20 Page 2 of 2
b) Policy Implications:
Part 14, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all or
part of the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality shall determine the
proportion of the cost of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and
determine the proportion of the cost of the service to be attributed to parcels of land which
the municipality considers will benefit from the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 163/18
will provide such determination for Subdivision 2017-169-SD.
CONCLUSION:
A developer has provided certain services in support of Subdivision 2017-169-SD. Some of the
services benefit adjacent lands therefore, it is appropriate to impose Latecomer Charges on the
benefitting lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 163/18 summarizes the municipality’s determination of
benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the term over which such Latecomer
Charges will be applied.
“Original signed by Mike Canning”
Prepared by: Mike Canning, PEng.
Manager of Infrastructure Development
“Original signed by David Pollock”
Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng.
Municipal Engineer
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
General Manager Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachments:
(A) Schedule A
(B) Benefitting Property Map
(C) Latecomer Agreement
Schedule A
TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE
1. EXTENDED NOMINAL SERVICE
A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows:
Block A, RP10274, S. Part Lot 9, Section 33,
Township 12, NWP 2409
RN 73994-0000-3
$5,385.00
S. Part Lot 9, Sec. 33, Township 12, NWP 2409
RN 73993-0000-8
$35,904.00
Pcl. A, RP 17267, of Lot 6, Section 32,
Township 12,NWP 18410
RN 73949-0201-8
$4,024.00
Service Total Number of
Equivalent
Development
Units
(EDU)
Total Cost Of
Benefit
Cost Per
EDU
EDU’s On
Benefiting
Property
Benefit
Attributed
By Property
Excluding
Subdivision
Sanitary
Sewer
232 Street
82 $147,203.00
$1,795.16 3 Block A, RP10274, S.
Part Lot 9, NWP 2409
RN 73994-0000-3
1 x $5,385.00
20 S. Part Lot 9,NWP 2409
RN 73993-0000-8
1 x $35,904.00
Sanitary
Sewer
136 Ave.
64 $85,845.00 $1,341.33 3 Pcl. A, RP 17267, of Lot
6, NWP 18410
RN 73949-0201-8
1 x $4,024.00
2 Lot 19, NWP 43567
RN 73938-0300-8
1 x $2,682.00
5 Lot 7, NWP 11173
RN 73935-0000-0
1 x $6,707.00
54 Lot 2, EPP 70286
RN 73949-0200-0
1 x $72,432.00
Lot 19, Sec. NE29, Twp. 12, NWP 43567
RN 73938-0300-8
$2,682.00
Lot 7, Blk. 1, Section 29, Twp. 12, NWP 11173
RN 73935-0000-0
$6,707.00
Lot 2, Section 32, Township 12, EPP 70286
RN 73949-0200-0
$72,432.00
Page 1 of 4
LATECOMER AGREEMENT
LC 163/18 2017-169-SD
THIS AGREEMENT made the day of , 2018
BETWEEN: SV 232 Street Development Ltd.
2626 Bellevue Avenue
West Vancouver, BC V7V 1E4
(Hereinafter called the “Subdivider”)
OF THE FIRST PART
AND: City of Maple Ridge
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge BC V2X 6A9
(Hereinafter called the “City”)
OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS:
A. The Subdivider has developed certain lands and premises located within the City of
Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more particularly known and
described as:
Lot 1, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan EPP 639138
(Hereinafter called the “said lands”);
B. In order to facilitate the approval of the subdivision of the said lands, the Subdivider
has constructed and installed the sanitary sewer shown on the design prepared by
Omega & Associates Engineering Ltd, Project No: 2013-323-02 (Sheets 20 and 21
of 43, Rev. No. 10) dated January 26, 2018, reviewed June 15, 2018.
Municipal Project No.5245-20-2013-086 and 5245-20-2017-169.
(Hereinafter called the “Extended Services”);
C. The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands
and other than the said lands;
D. The City considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive;
E. The Subdivider has provided the Extended Services in the Amount of $233,048.00.
Page 2 of 4
F. The City has determined that:
Block A, RP10274, South Part of Lot 9, Section 33, Township 12, NWP 2409;
South Part of Lot 9, Section 33, Township 12, NWP 2409;
Parcel A, RP 17267, of Lot 6, Section 32, Township 12, NWP 18410;
Lot 19, Section NE29, Township 12, NWP 43567;
Lot 7, Blk. 1, Section 29, Township 12, NWP 11173;
Lot 2, Section 32, Township 12, EPP 70286
(the “Benefitting Lands”) will benefit from the Extended Services;
G. The City has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands connecting
to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the “Latecomer Charge”) on the
Benefitting Lands in the following amounts:
Block A, RP10274, South Part of Lot 9, Sec, 33, Twp. 12, NWP 2409
RN 73994-0000-3
$5,385.00 for connection to or use of the sanitary sewer on 232 Street
South Part of Lot 9, Section 33, Township 12, NWP 2409
RN 73993-0000-8
$35,904.00 for connection to or use of the sanitary sewer on 232 Street
Parcel A, RP 17267, of Lot 6, Section 32, Township 12, NWP 18410
RN 73949-0201-8
$4,024.00 for connection to or use of the sanitary sewer on 136 Avenue
Lot 19, Section NE29, Township 12, NWP 43567
RN 73938-0300-8
$2,682.00 for connection to or use of the sanitary sewer on 136 Avenue
Lot 7, Blk. 1, Section 29, Township 12, NWP 11173
RN 73935-0000-0
$6,707.00 for connection to or use of the sanitary sewer on 136 Avenue
Lot 2, Section 32, Township 12, EPP 70286
RN 73949-0200-0
$72,432.00 for connection to or use of the sanitary sewer on 136 Avenue
plus interest calculated annually from the date of completion of the Extended
Services as certified by the General Manager Public Works & Development Services
of the City (the “Completion Date”) to the date of connection of the Benefitting Lands
to the Extended Services;
H. The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and
collected by the City shall pursuant to Section 508 (2) of the Local Government Act
R.S.B.C. 2015, c.1 be paid to the Subdivider as provided for in this Agreement.
Page 3 of 4
NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 508 (5) of the Local Government Act
R.S.B.C 2015, c.1, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and
collected by the City within fifteen (15) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to
the Subdivider and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of the next
June 30th or December 31st that follows the date on which the Latecomer Charge was
collected by the City.
2. This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any
purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer Charge by the City to the
Subdivider, or fifteen (15) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the City
shall be forever fully released and wholly discharged from any and all liability and
obligations herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer Charge, and
whether arising before or after the expiry of this Agreement.
3. The Subdivider represents and warrants to the City that the Subdivider has
not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from
the owner of the Benefitting Lands for the provision, or expectation of the provision of
the Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein; and
further represents and warrants that he has not entered into any agreement with the
owner of the Benefitting Lands for consideration in any way related to or connected
directly or indirectly with the provision of the Extended Services. The representations
and warranties of the Subdivider herein shall, notwithstanding Item 2 of this
Agreement, survive the expiry of this Agreement.
4. The Subdivider (if more than one corporate body or person) hereby agrees
that the City shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in
equal shares.
5. If the Subdivider is a sole corporate body or person, the City shall remit the
Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the
following (name and address of director of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.):
6. In the event that the Subdivider is not the owner of the said lands, the owner
shall hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto the Subdivider, his heirs and
assigns, all rights, title and interest under this Agreement.
Page 4 of 4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective Corporate
Seals, attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf, the
day and year first above written.
SUBDIVIDER
Subdivider - Authorized Signatory
Subdivider - Authorized Signatory
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
Corporate Officer - Authorized Signatory
11-5255-50-063 Page 1 of 3
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 4, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 11-5255-50-063
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COW
SUBJECT: Award of Contract ITT-EN18-78: North Lane Sanitary Sewer Replacement
by Pipe Bursting
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The upsizing of the existing sanitary sewer located in North Lane, located between Lougheed
Highway and North Avenue from 223 Street to 224, is required to serve existing businesses and
accommodate ongoing development in the area. The sanitary sewer main along North Lane was
constructed of vitrified clay pipe, and a recent Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) inspection revealed
significant deficiencies along the section of sewer main due to offset joints, cracks and fractures.
The North Lane Sanitary Sewer Replacement by Pipe Bursting project is in the City’s approved 2018
Financial Plan and is solely funded by the Sewer Rehabilitation Program.
The project entails the replacement and upsizing of pipe from 200mm diameter to 250mm in
diameter for approximately 167 metres of sanitary sewer. Trenchless technology or pipe-bursting
was selected as the appropriate sewer replacement method rather than the traditional open-cut
method due to several complex site constraints.
An Invitation to Tender to replace 167 metres of sanitary sewer main was issued on October 3, 2018
and closed on November 7, 2018. One compliant tender was received by PW Trenchless
Construction Inc. at $448,807.00 (excluding taxes).
Staff have reviewed the tender and recommend that the contract be awarded to PW Trenchless
Construction Inc. for the amount of $448,807.00 (excluding taxes).
Council approval to award the contract is required for the work to proceed.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Contract ITT-EN18-78: North Lane Sanitary Sewer Replacement by Pipe Bursting, be awarded to
PW Trenchless Construction Inc. in the amount of $448,807.00 excluding taxes; and
That a contract contingency of $50,000.00 be approved to address potential variations in field
conditions; and
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
11-5255-50-063 Page 2 of 3
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The upsizing of the existing sanitary sewer located in North Lane, located between Lougheed
Highway and North Avenue from 223 Street to 224, is required to serve existing businesses
and accommodate ongoing development in the area. The sanitary sewer main along North
Lane was constructed of vitrified clay pipe, and a recent Closed Circuit Television (CCTV)
inspection revealed significant deficiencies along the section of sewer main due to offset
joints, cracks and fractures. The North Lane Sanitary Sewer Replacement by Pipe Bursting
project is in the City’s approved 2018 Financial Plan and is solely funded by the Sewer
Rehabilitation Program.
The project entails the replacement and upsizing of pipe from 200mm diameter to 250mm
in diameter for approximately 167 metres of sanitary sewer. Trenchless technology or pipe-
bursting was selected as the appropriate sewer replacement method rather than the
traditional open-cut method due to several complex site constraints.
Tender results
An Invitation to Tender was issued on October 13, 2018 and closed on November 7, 2018.
One compliant tender was submitted as noted below:
PW Trenchless Construction Inc. is recognized as an industry leader in pipe bursting
technology and they successfully completed several pipe bursting projects for the City of
Maple Ridge.
b) Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome is to construct the necessary sanitary sewer replacement to adequately
service the 22300 block area of North Lane to serve existing businesses and to
accommodate future development.
c) Strategic Alignment:
The most recent CCTV inspection identified this sanitary sewer as a key piece of
infrastructure for replacement.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Construction will commence in January 2019 and attempts will be made to minimize the
impact to everyday traffic, residents, and businesses in the neighbourhood that access the
lane.
Notifications will be delivered to surrounding businesses to inform them of the upcoming
project. The general public will be informed of the construction project progress and with
updates through the City’s website and social media sources.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
The Engineering Department has worked with the Operations Department in developing this
project.
Tender Price (excluding taxes)
PW Trenchless Construction Inc. $448,807.00
11-5255-50-063 Page 3 of 3
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The projected expenditures excluding taxes are as follows:
Construction Contract Cost
Contract Contingency
Total Projected Project Cost
The project funding sources are as follows:
Sewer Utility Fund
Total Funding Sources
$
$
$
$
$
448,807.00
50,000.00
498,807.00
500,000.00
500,000.00
Due to the complexity of this sanitary sewer replacement project using pipe bursting, staff
recommends a contract contingency in the amount of $50,000.00 that will only be utilized if
required to address unforeseen conditions.
CONCLUSION:
The replacement of the existing sanitary sewer on North Lane, located between Lougheed Highway
and North Avenue from 223 Street to 224 is required to continue to serve existing businesses and
accommodate future development. It is recommended that Council approve the award to PW
Trenchless Construction Inc. for the amount of $448,807.00
“Original signed by Jeff Boehmer”
Prepared by: Jeff Boehmer, PEng.
Manager of Design & Construction
“Original signed by Trevor Thompson”
Financial: Trevor Thompson, BBA, CPA, CGA
Concurrence: Chief Financial Officer
“Original signed by David Pollock”
Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng.
Municipal Engineer
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
General Manager Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachments:
(A) Map
1200 Staff Reports
1200
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 6
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 11, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2018-201-DP and
2018-202- DVP
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Development Permit and Development Variance Permit
11718 224 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A Town Centre Development Permit application and a Development Variance Permit application have
been received for the subject property, located at 11718 224 Street, to construct a five storey
residential apartment building with 23 residential units under the existing RM-2 (Medium Density
Apartment Residential) zone. This application is subject to the Town Centre Development Permit
(South View Precinct) Guidelines as outlined in the Town Centre Area Plan. The applicant is seeking
the following variances:
To reduce the front yard setback from 7.5 m to 6.0 m on the residential floors, with no
further siting exceptions;
To reduce the rear yard setback from 7.5 m to 0.0 m at the parkade entrance and from 7.5
m to 4.0 m on the residential floors, with no further siting exceptions;
To reduce the interior side yard setback on the north side from 7.5 m to 4.0 m at the
parkade entrance and from 7.5 m to 4.0 m on the residential floors, with no further siting
exceptions;
To reduce the interior side yard setback on the south side from 7.5 m to 3.40 m at the
parkade entrance and from 7.5 m to 4.0 m on the residential floors, with no further siting
exceptions;
To increase the maximum number of storeys permitted from four storeys to five storeys and
increase the maximum building height from a maximum of 15 m to 18.98 m due to the
sloping topography on the east side, with no further siting exceptions; and
To increase the maximum retaining wall height from 1.2 m to 2.44 m to permit the
construction of landscape planters, with no further siting exceptions.
The proposed building is Phase 1 of a two phase redevelopment of 11718 224 Street and the
property directly east on Fraser Street. Phase 2 of the development, as proposed, will see that that
two properties will be consolidated. Consolidation will make redundant the rear lot line of 11718
224 Street and the variances to it above.
The proposed building in Phase 1 of the development conforms to the development and design
principles specificity, placemaking, community building and a denser, urban environment as outlined
in the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan, Town Centre Development Permit (South View Precinct)
Guidelines.
It is recommended that Development Permit 2018-201-DP and Development Variance Permit 2018-
202-DVP be approved.
1201
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 6
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-201-DP respecting property
located at 11718 224 Street; and
2. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2018-202-DVP be approved.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: 1122256 BC LTD
Legal Description: Lot 8 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminister District
Plan 8181
OCP:
Existing: Low-Rise Apartment
Zoning:
Existing: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
Surrounding Uses
North: Use: Apartment building
Zone: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Designation Town Centre Commercial
South: Use: Apartment building
Zone: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
Designation: Low-Rise Apartment
East: Use: Vacant
Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
Designation: Ground-Oriented Multi-Family
West: Use: Office Building
Zone: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Designation: Low-Rise Apartment
Existing Use of Property: Vacant Land
Proposed Use of Property: 23 unit apartment building
Site Area: 0.11 ha (0.27 acres)
Access: Fraser Street using access easement over 11701
Fraser Street
Servicing: Urban
b) Project Description
The subject property is zoned RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) which permits
apartment use. Under the subject application, the developer has proposed to construct a 5 storey
residential apartment building with 2 storeys of underground parking. The underground parking
structure will be accessed via an easement across the property directly east; therefore, the access
will be from 224 Street. The project includes 23 residential units; indoor and outdoor amenity space
and an amenity guest suite. There is a mixture of one and two bedroom units with two of the two
bedroom units being adaptable units.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 6
c) Requested Variances and Analysis
A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project, and involves the
following relaxations:
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, Part 6, RM-2 Medium Density Apartment
Residential District 6) Sitting a) to reduce the front yard setback from 7.5 m to 6.0 m on the
residential floors, with no further siting exceptions;
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, Part 6, RM-2 Medium Density Apartment
Residential District 6) Sitting a) to reduce the front yard setback from 7.5 m to 1.8m to
permit a front entry roof projection, with no further siting exceptions;
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, Part 6, RM-2 Medium Density Apartment
Residential District 6) Sitting a) to reduce the rear yard setback from 7.5 m to 0.0 m at the
parkade entrance and from 7.5 m to 4.0 m on the residential floors, with no further siting
exceptions;
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, Part 6, RM-2 Medium Density Apartment
Residential District 6) Sitting a) to reduce the interior side yard setback on the north side
from 7.5 m to 4.0 m at the parkade entrance and from 7.5 m to 4.0 m on the residential
floors, with no further siting exceptions;
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, Part 6, RM-2 Medium Density Apartment
Residential District 6) Sitting a) to reduce the interior side yard setback on the south side
from 7.5 m to 3.4 m at the parkade entrance and from 7.5 m to 4.0 m on the residential
floors, with no further siting exceptions;
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, Part 6, RM-2 Medium Density Apartment
Residential District 7) Size og Building and Structures to increase the maximum number of
storeys permitted from four storeys to five storeys and increase the maximum building height
from a maximum of 15 m to 18.98 m due to the sloping topography on the east side, no
further siting exceptions; and
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, Part 4, General Regulations (8) Maximum
Retaining Wall Height, to increase the maximum retaining wall height from 1.2 m to 2.44 m
to permit the construction of landscape planters, with no further siting exceptions.
The proposed variances can be supported as the variances allow for a better utilization of the site
due to the steep grade differences from west to east. With the variances the existing topography is
respected as the development follows the lines of the land. The design and siting of building
prospects access to natural features and views, enhancing privacy and livability. Along with the use
of natural landscaping and species the impacts on the adjacent properties are reduced.
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The proposed residential development is in keeping with the policies of the Official Community Plan.
The Town Centre Area Plan designates the subject property as Low-Rise Apartment which allows for
development in a three (3) to five (5) storey apartment form where units are accessed from an
internal corridor and residential parking is provided underground. The current zoning of RM-2
(Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone is consistent with this designation.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 6
Development Permit Guidelines: The development permit application made to the City is subject to
the Key Guidelines and the Design Guidelines of Section 8.11 Town Centre Development Permit
(South View Predict).
Key Guidelines:
The following is a brief description and assessment of the proposals compliance with the applicable
Key Development Permit Guidelines:
1. Promote North and South View as Distinctive, Highly Liveable Multi-Family Neighbourhoods
Does proposed development help to establish the precinct as a residential area with a mix of
housing types at varying densities?
Applicant Explanation: "The development is proposing a mix of 1 and 2 bedroom units. 3 units on the
ground floor are adaptable units."
Staff Comment: Complies with Guideline.
2. Create Pedestrian-Friendly, Ground-Oriented, Multi-Family Community
Does the building’s form and mass support a strong pedestrian -oriented urban realm and help
define the street and sidewalk areas as active public spaces? Taller buildings should be stepped
back podium style.
Applicant Explanation: "To enhance the urban realm and pedestrian oriented streetscape, we have
incorporated the following:
The entrances are visually prominent from the 224th Street. The building entry is framed by a
projecting entry statement with a large overhang supported by heavy timber post and expansive
glass. Adjacent to the building entry is the indoor and outdoor amenity space. The indoor amenity is
also visible from the street with large glazing. The outdoor amenity is surrounded by extensive
landscaping/planting. The residential unit facing 224th will have patio and direct access from the
street."
Staff Comment: Complies with Guideline.
3. Maintain Cohesive Building Styles
Is there consistency with other new buildings in the precinct in terms of architecture, building
setbacks, form, mass, and height?
Applicant Explanation: "To the project north, south and west are older low-rise apartment and office
buildings."
Staff Comment: Complies with Guideline.
4. Capitalize on Important Views
Does proposed new development capitalize on mountain and/or river views?
Applicant Explanation: "Extensive glazing and balconies are provided in each unit to take advantage
of natural light and views."
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 6
Staff Comment: Complies with Guideline.
Have the important views of existing buildings been considered in relation to the proposed
development?
Applicant Explanation: "Building is setback from the property line with extensive landscaping around
the building."
Staff Comment: Complies with Guideline.
5. Provide Private and Semi-Private Green Space
Does proposed development include front and back courtyards (in multi-family developments) and
incorporate universal access, reduce vandalism, and increase safety in the design?
Applicant Explanation: "A common outdoor amenity is provided facing 224th Street. All units are
designed to have patio, balcony or roof deck."
Staff Comment: Complies with Guideline.
e) Advisory Design Panel:
The Advisory Design Panel (ADP) reviewed the form and character of the proposed development and
the landscaping plans at a meeting held on July 18, 2018. The following resolution was passed in
regards to 2018-201-DP at the meeting.
That the following concerns regarding File No. 2018-201-DP be addressed and digital versions
of revised drawings and memo be submitted to Planning staff; and further that Planning staff
forward this on to the Advisory Design Panel for information.
Landscape Comments:
1. Add more trees on the North side of the building and balance the tree spacing on the
North end; align trees similar to other planting area on site;
2. Add lighting and wayfinding to the North East exit from the parkade;
3. Provide a program that will activate the amenity spaces transparent to the front yard
along 224 Street.
Architectural Comments:
1. Provide three dimensional renderings
2. Consider following the property line for the South façade to provide opportunities to
add Eastern side windows in the living rooms;
3. Public Art to be provided in a manner that will serve both Phase 1 and 2 with details
provided to the Advisory Design Panel as part of the Phase 2 Development Permit
submission;
4. Provide matching through wall flashing to adjacent material colour;
5. Reduce the depth of the East suite balconies to enhance access to natural light;
6. Create a more identifiable front entry;
7. Re-evaluate the location of the sliding patio doors in Unit 501 ;
8. Provide canopy over parkade man-doors;
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 6 of 6
9.Describe anticipated amenities that will be provided in Phase 2, such as child play
areas;
10.Re-evaluate the climb-ability of patio railings with respect to safety; and
11.Re-evaluate the materials and colours on the South West corner.
The ADP concerns have been addressed and are reflected in the current plans.
f)Financial Implications:
In accordance with Council’s Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of
the estimated landscape cost will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on an estimated
landscape cost of $43,693.36, the security will be $43,693.36.
There will be approximately 2 trees added along 224 Street to the municipal street tree inventory on
completion of this project. The costs associated with maintaining these trees will need to be
included in a subsequent operating budget.
CONCLUSION:
A Development Variance Permit application and a Town Centre Development Permit application have
been received for the subject property located at 11718 224 Street to construct a five storey
residential apartment building with 23 residential units. This application is subject to the Town
Centre Development Permit (South View Precinct) Guidelines as outlined in the Town Centre Area
Plan of the Official Community Plan (OCP). It is recommended that the Corporate Officer be
authorized to sign and seal applications 2016-40-DVP and 2016-240-DP.
“Original signed by Wendy Cooper”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Wendy Cooper, MCIP, RPP
Senior Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_____________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Photo
Appendix C – Site Plan
Appendix D – Building Elevations
Appendix E – Landscape Plans
DATE: Nov 21, 2018
FILE: 2018-202-VP
11718 224 ST
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
2015-318-RZ2015-318-SD
2015-318-DP
2017-572-RZ
2017-572-DP
2017-572-DP
2017-161-RZ
2017-161-VP
2017-161-DP
2017-247-RZ
2017-078-RZ
2017-078-VP
2017-078-DP
´
Scale: 1:1,500 BY: RA
Legend
Address Leader
Parcels
Active Applications (RZ/SD/DP/VP)
APPENDIX A
DATE: May 17, 2018
2018-202-VP
11718 224 St
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER
R
.
^
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´
Scale: 1:1,500 BY: JV
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX D
10'-058"[3.06m]10'-058"[3.06m]10'-058"[3.06m]151.59' (46.20m)FOURTH FLOORT.O. SHEATHING121.43' (37.01m)MAIN FLOORT.O. SLAB141.53' (43.14m)THIRD FLOORT.O. SHEATHING131.48' (40.07m)SECOND FLOORT.O. SHEATHING110.43' (33.66m)PARKING LEVEL 1T.O. SLAB99.43' (30.31m)PARKING LEVEL 2T.O. SLAB11'-0"[3.35m]11'-0"[3.35m]WOODTONE FIBERCEMENT SIDINGGLASS RAILINGFIBER CEMENT PANEL(WHITE)ADBC27'-1"[8.26m]5'-0"[1.52m]27'-1"[8.26m]ELEVATORPENTHOUSELINE OF U/GPARKADEFASCIA BOARDVINYL WINDOWFIBER CEMENT PANEL(GRAY)62'-314"[18.98m]PARKING GATECULTURED STONE15.0m MAX. BLDG.HEIGHT LINE13'-034"[3.98m]PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE172.70' (52.64m)T.O. ROOF PEAK170.70' (52.03m)FIFTH FLOORU.S. OF CEILING161.64' (49.27m)FIFTH FLOORT.O. SHEATHING10'-058"[3.06m]9'-034"[2.76m]2'-0"[0.61m]THROUGH - WALL FLASHING& PANEL JOINT COLOUR TOMATCH ADJACENT SIDING/PANEL COLOUR TYP.ALLEN BLOCK (GREY)AUGUST 07, 2018EAST ELEVATIONDP 3.4SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"
224TH STREETACER GRISEUMSTREET TREEPICEA OMORIKA 'BRUNS'ACER CIRCINATUMVARIETY & SPACINGTBDCONCRETE RETAINING WALL BY ARCHDRAIN ROCKON SLABSQ. CONCRETE PAVERSBY BARKMAN CONCRETEBROADWAY 65MM PAVERSREGENCY WHITECITY SIDEWALKSODDED LAWNLOUNGE SEATINGSOLUS DECOR HEMI 36" IN NUTMEG,NATURAL GAS FUEL,ELECTRONIC IGNITIONWITH HARDWOOD TABLE TOPWISHBONE INDUSTRIES - WHALE TAIL24" SQ. BLOCKS OF WOOD, FORSITTING/CLIMBINGENTRANCE GATE1CONCRETE PILLARSBARKMAN CONCRETE PAVERSBROADWAY 65MM, 12X24 (COSMO BLACK)& 24X24 SIZE, (REGENCY WHITE)PATIO (GROUND LEVEL)CONCRETE PATH PARKADEPLANTED SIZE / REMARKSCOMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEPLANT SCHEDULEKEY QTYTREE11 ACER CIRCINATUM VINE MAPLE 2.0M HT; B&B; 3 STEM CLUMP4 ACER GRISEUM PAPERBARK MAPLE 6CM CAL; 1.8M STD; B&B4 PICEA OMORIKA 'BRUNS' BRUNS SERBIAN SPRUCE 2.5M HT; B&B3 STREET TREE - -SHRUB2 AZALEA JAPONICA 'PURPLE SPLENDOUR' AZALEA; RED-VIOLET #2 POT; 25CM 45 BUXUS MICROPHYLLA 'WINTER GEM' LITTLE-LEAF BOX #3 POT; 40CM48 EUONYMUS ALATA 'COMPACTUS' COMPACT WINGED BURNING BUSH #3 POT; 50CM3 HYDRANGEA MACROPHYLLA 'PIA' DWARF BIGLEAF HYDRANGEA; PINK #3 POT; 40CM42 SKIMMIA JAPONICA (10% MALE) JAPANESE SKIMMIA #3 POT; 50CM6 TAXUS X MEDIA 'HICKSII' HICK'S YEW 1.2M B&B51 VACCINIUM OVATUM 'THUNDERBIRD' EVERGREEN HUCKLEBERRY #3 POT; 60CM45 VIBURNUM DAVIDII DAVID'S VIBURNUM #2 POT; 30CM GRASS33 CAREX 'ICE DANCE' FROSTED SEDGE #1 POT31 IMPERATA CYLINDRICA 'RED BARON' BLOOD GRASS #1 POTPERENNIAL15 IBERIS SEMPERVIRENS `SNOWFLAKE' SNOWFLAKE EVERGREEN CANDYTUFT 9CM POT22 LAVENDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA 'MUNSTEAD' ENGLISH LAVENDER; COMPACT; VIOLET-BLUE #1 POT11 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA VAR SULLIVANTII `GOLDSTURM' RUDBECKIA; YELLOW 15CM POTGC105 POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM WESTERN SWORD FERN #1 POT; 25CMNOTES: * PLANT SIZES IN THIS LIST ARE SPECIFIED ACCORDING TO THE BC LANDSCAPE STANDARD AND CANADIAN LANDSCAPE STANDARD, LATEST EDITION. CONTAINER SIZESSPECIFIED AS PER CNLA STANDARD. BOTH PLANT SIZE AND CONTAINER SIZE ARE THE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE SIZES. * REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR DEFINED CONTAINERMEASUREMENTS AND OTHER PLANT MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS. * SEARCH AND REVIEW: MAKE PLANT MATERIAL AVAILABLE FOR OPTIONAL REVIEW BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ATSOURCE OF SUPPLY. AREA OF SEARCH TO INCLUDE LOWER MAINLAND AND FRASER VALLEY. * SUBSTITUTIONS: OBTAIN WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO MAKING ANY SUBSTITUTIONS TO THE SPECIFIED MATERIAL. UNAPPROVED SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE REJECTED. ALLOW A MINIMUM OF FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO DELIVERYFOR REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE. SUBSTITUTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO BC LANDSCAPE STANDARD AND CANADIAN LANDSCAPE STANDARD - DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS OFAVAILABILITY. ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP MUST MEET OR EXCEED BC LANDSCAPE STANDARD AND CANADIAN LANDSCAPE STANDARD LATEST EDITION. ALLPLANT MATERIAL MUST BE PROVIDED FROM CERTIFIED DISEASE FREE NURSERYPMG PROJECT NUMBER: 18-056CONCRETE GATE POST1'-6"4'2'-11"3'-11"3"3"2"112"112"3"2"CONCRETE GATE POSTSANDBLASTED FINISH3'-6"ALUMINIUM GATE & FRAMEPOWDER COATED CHARCOALENTRANCE GATE112" = 1'-0"11718RECESSED LIGHT3.5" HIGH BLACKADDRESS NUMBERSSECURED TO CONCRETEPLAN VIEWSTREET VIEWSIDE VIEWWISHBONE INDUSTRIES - WHALE TAILSOLUS DECOR = HEMI FIREBOWLCHK'D:18056-01.ZIPDRAWN:DESIGN:SCALE:DATE:PMG PROJECT NUMBER:18-056OF 2DRAWING TITLE:MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.RESIDENTIAL DEV.PROJECT:DRAWING NUMBER:REVISION DESCRIPTIONNO. DATE DR.11718 224TH ST.SEAL: Copyright reserved. This drawing and design is theproperty of PMG Landscape Architects and may not bereproduced or used for other projects without theirpermission.cCLIENT:Burnaby, British Columbia, V5C 6G9p: 604 294-0011 ; f: 604 294-0022Suite C100 - 4185 Still Creek Drive--- -LANDSCAPEPLAN - GROUND FLOORL118.MAR.201"=10'-0"MMMMMCYAPPENDIX E
DOVE GREY FLAT PEBBLES 1-1/4" TO 2-3/8" SIZE,NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SUPPLY770380TEQUILA SUNRISE PEBBLES1-32 TSP1275NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SUPPLYPRIVATE PATIOPRIVATE PATIODOVE GREY FLAT PEBBLES 1-1/4" TO 2-3/8" SIZE,NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SUPPLY770380TEQUILA SUNRISE PEBBLES1-32 TSP1275NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SUPPLYCHK'D:18056-01.ZIPDRAWN:DESIGN:SCALE:DATE:PMG PROJECT NUMBER:18-056OF 2DRAWING TITLE:MAPLE RIDGE, B.C.RESIDENTIAL DEV.PROJECT:DRAWING NUMBER:REVISION DESCRIPTIONNO. DATE DR.11718 224TH ST.SEAL: Copyright reserved. This drawing and design is theproperty of PMG Landscape Architects and may not bereproduced or used for other projects without theirpermission.cCLIENT:Burnaby, British Columbia, V5C 6G9p: 604 294-0011 ; f: 604 294-0022Suite C100 - 4185 Still Creek Drive--- -LANDSCAPEPLAN - 5TH FLOORL218.MAR.201"=10'-0"MMMMMCY
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 11, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2018-490-DVP
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit
10607 277 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Development Variance Permit application (2018-490-DVP) has been received in conjunction with a
building permit application to construct a detached garden suite in accordance with the Zoning
Bylaw for properties that are within the Agricultural Land Reserve. The requested variances are to:
increase the maximum building height of a detached garden suite in the RS-3 One Family
Rural Residential Zone from 6.0 metres to 7.5 metres.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-490-DVP respecting property located
at 10607 277 Street.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context
Applicant: Jacqlyn Rempel
Legal Description: Lot: 2, Section: 8, Township: 15, Plan: NWP10078
OCP : Agriculture
Existing: AGR (Agricultural)
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Rural Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation Agricultural
South: Use: Rural Residential
Zone: RS-3 ( One Family Rural Residential)
Designation Agricultural
East: Use: Rural Residential
Zone: RS-3 ( One Family Rural Residential)
Designation Agricultural
West: Use: Rural Residential
Zone: RS-3 ( One Family Rural Residential)
Designation Agricultural
1202
Existing Use of Property: Agricultural, Rural Residential
Proposed Use of Property: No change
Site Area: 1.75 ha (4.3 acres)
Access: 277th Street
Servicing: On site water and sewer
b) Project Description:
This application is for the construction of a detached garden suite on the subject property, which has
farm status. An existing accessory residential structure will be demolished and replaced with a 2
storey structure consisting of a workshop/garage at grade and a dwelling unit above. This proposal
is permitted for properties within the Agricultural Land Reserve with farm status. The proposed
structure is 7.5 metres in height. In the RS-3 Zone, the Zoning Bylaw restricts height to a 6.0 metre
maximum for detached garden suites.
c) Variance Analysis:
The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for single family
development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval
process.
1. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No 3510 -1985, Part 4, Section 402, 11. (q)i A):
To vary maximum height for a detached garden suite from 6.0 metres to 7.5 metres.
This height variance is supportable due to Agricultural Land Commission requirements for detached
garden suites. This use is required to be on the second storey of another structure. Due to the
challenges involved with accommodating a two storey structure with these height restrictions, the
variance is supportable.
Citizen/Customer Implications:
In accordance with the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, notice of Council
consideration of a resolution to issue a Development Variance Permit was mailed to all owners or
tenants in occupation of all parcels, any parts of which are adjacent to the property that is subject to
the permit.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed variance to the height of a detached garden suite is supported because of the
challenges in accommodating the requirements of the Agricultural Land Commission within
prescribed limitations of the Zoning Bylaw.
It is therefore recommended that this application be favourably considered and the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal Development Variance Permit 2018-490-DVP.
“Original signed by Diana Hall”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Diana Hall , M.A., MCIP, RPP
Planner 2
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Building Elevation showing height variance.
FILE: 2018-490-VP
DATE: Nov 1, 2018
10607 277 ST
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:3,500 BY: RA
108 AVE
277 ST276 STLegend
Stream
Ditch Centreline
Indefinite Creek
Lake or Reservoir
APPENDIX A
FILE: 2018-490-VP
DATE: Nov 1, 2018
10607 277 ST
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´
Scale: 1:3,500 BY: RA
108 AVE
277 ST276 STAPPENDIX B
Variance height request from 6.0
metres to 7.5 meters
APPENDIX C
Doc # 2105178 Page 1 of 3
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 11, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2105178
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Award of Contract – Civil Works for the Maple Ridge Cemetery Expansion
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Maple Ridge Cemetery provides a range of interment options for cremated remains and full burial.
The current inventory of full burial plots is the most limited of available interment options and is
anticipated to be depleted in the coming weeks. The planned expansion will provide additional full
burial plots as well as other interment options, such as a scattering garden and green burial section,
to address current needs and emerging trends.
The expansion work provides a new entry off Dewdney Trunk Road (DTR) to accommodate funeral
service needs and a small parking area for public access to grave sites for visitors with mobility
challenges. The work also includes storm drainage, water line and tap, ornamental fencing along
DTR, landscape enhancements and a pathway connection to the rest of the cemetery. The cost to
provide for this work is contained within the City’s adopted financial plan. The development timeline
is anticipated to take six weeks, and once complete, the expanded cemetery will be able to continue
to provide a full range of interment options.
An Invitation to Tender for these civil works was issued on September 27, 2018, and ten bids were
submitted before closing on October 18, 2018. Staff has reviewed the tenders and recommends that
the contract be awarded to the submission that provides the City with the best overall value,
received from Custom Blacktop Co. in the amount of $150,566 excluding taxes.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Contract ITT-PL18-75: Maple Ridge Cemetery Civil Works be awarded to Custom Blacktop Co. in
the amount of $150,566 plus taxes, as well as a contingency of $30,000 be authorized; and further
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The Maple Ridge Cemetery has very few full burial plots remaining on the existing lands.
Cemetery expansion is needed to continue to provide for this interment option as well as
other options to address emerging trends such as green burials and scattering gardens. The
new Cemetery section was rezoned earlier this year and new burial plots were registered with
Consumer Protection B.C. The next step in completing the expansion is to complete the civil
work which includes a new access road off Dewdney Trunk Road, ornamental gate and
1203
Doc # 2105178 Page 2 of 3
fencing, landscape enhancements, storm drainage, and a waterline. This work, when
complete, will provide an attractive addition to the existing cemetery. The new entrance and
laneway will accommodate funeral processions and graveside services, accessible public
access and parking. A pathway connection to the rest of the cemetery will be established as
well as landscape enhancements which many visitors value highly. A new water line will also
be installed to provide water access for filling of memorial flower vases and watering
landscaped areas. Memorial benches, donation tree plantings and a memory wall for the
scattering garden can also be accommodated.
While the immediate expansion provides for full burial plots and green burial options, an area
has been set aside to accommodate future interment trends such as a woodland scattering
garden as well as additional columbaria niches when the current inventory becomes
depleted.
An Invitation to Tender for the construction work was issued through BC Bid on September
27, 2018, and closed on October 18, 2018. Ten bids were submitted with the total tender
prices (excluding taxes) ranging from a low of $150,566 to a high of $307,700. Tenders
were checked for completeness and compliance with the Invitation to Tender documents,
and eight tenders were found to be compliant. The eight bid results are listed below from
lowest to highest price.
Total Tender Price
Action Holdings Ltd. O/A Custom Blacktop Co. $150,566.00
Nations First Contracting $155,290.00
Wood Products Ltd. $195,100.00
Canadian Landscape Construction Services Ltd. $216,420.00
Summit Earthworks $271,050.00
RTR Terra Contracting $281,200.00
Cedar Crest Lands (BC) Ltd. $291,900.00
GRP Construction Ltd. $307,700.00
Staff evaluated the bids in accordance with the factors specified in the Invitation to Tender,
using the information submitted within each bid. After concluding this evaluation, staff
identified that the submission from Action Holdings Ltd. O/A Custom Blacktop Co. provides
the best overall value to the City. Custom Blacktop is experienced in asphalt construction,
drainage and landscape works with recent projects in the lower mainland.
b) Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome is to expand the Cemetery to continue to provide a full range of
interment options including full burial plots.
c) Strategic Alignment:
This project aligns with recommendations in the Cemetery Master Plan (2008) to
accommodate the short/medium term cemetery needs in one location for operational
efficiency; to ensure the cemetery is readily accessible; to provide frontage on a major street
to enhance the marketability of the services and provide space for increased parking; and to
locate the cemetery in an attractive setting to help create a meaningful place of
remembrance.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Citizens will benefit from continued full burial options as well as additional interment options
which take into consideration emerging trends.
Doc # 2105178 Page 3 of 3
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
The Engineering Department was consulted during the detailed design process to ensure
that site servicing is to City standards.
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
Project funding in the amount of $150,566 plus taxes and a recommended contingency of
$30,000 is included as part of the Cemetery Expansion capital project within the approved
Financial Plan. The project is funded through approved borrowing with the debt being
serviced through cemetery revenues. Given the cost of these works it is unlikely that external
borrowing would be initiated and the cost would be funded directly from the Cemetery
Reserve.
A contingency of $30,000 is recommended in case the work exposes other issues that have
not been identified or anticipated. If the contingency is not required for this purpose, it would
not be used.
CONCLUSIONS:
The planned expansion of the Maple Ridge Cemetery will provide additional full burial plots to meet
an imminent need as existing inventory is depleted. The expansion will also provide for other
interment options that address emerging interment trends. Staff has reviewed the tender
submissions and recommends that the project be awarded to Custom Blacktop Co.
“Original signed by Valoree Richmond”
Prepared by: Valoree Richmond, MBCSLA
Manager of Parks Planning & Development
“Original signed by David Boag”
Reviewed by: David Boag
Director of Parks & Facilities
“Original signed by Trevor Thompson”
Reviewed by: Trevor Thompson, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Financial Officer
“Original signed by Kelly Swift”
Approved by: Kelly Swift, MBA
General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
“Original signed by Frank Quinn for”
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
Doc #2102859 Page 1 of 2
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 11, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2102859
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Award of Contract RFP-PL18-67 for Janitorial Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Six submissions were received following a Request for Proposals for Janitorial Services (RFP-PL18-
67) which closed on November 20, 2018. The RFP sought proposals that would maintain the current
scope of janitorial services at facilities operated and maintained by the City of Maple Ridge, and also
requested optional pricing for organic green waste collection and enhanced recycling services.
Facilities Operations staff reviewed the proposals in accordance with established evaluation criteria
based on best value submission for a janitorial services contract.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Contract RFP-PL18-67 for Janitorial Services, including organic green waste collection and
increased recycling service, be awarded to Hallmark Facility Service Inc. for a two-year period with an
annual contract price of $325,032 (excluding taxes), with options to renew for three additional one-
year terms, and subject to maximum increases of 2.5% for each renewal; and
That the Facilities Operations annual budget be increased by $12,732 plus taxes to accommodate
added organic green waste collection and increased recycling service resulting from the award of
Contract RFP-PL18-67 for Janitorial Services to Hallmark Facility Service Inc; and further
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The City’s current contract for janitorial services expires on January 14, 2019. Janitorial
services are critical to managing the cleaning standards in buildings and facilities operated
and maintained by the City. In September 2018, staff completed a publicly advertised
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process for the purpose of short listing pre-qualified
janitorial contractors to participate in an RFP process. The RFQ process resulted in a short
list of eight pre-qualified firms.
The subsequent RFP outlined expectations that align with current service levels in terms of
cleaning standards and routines, response times for emergency service calls, quality
assurance, and environmental stewardship through the use of green cleaning products. Also
included in the RFP was a request for separate pricing for organic waste collection and a
more comprehensive recycling program for all City sites. Organic waste pick-up services are
not included in the existing janitorial services contract, and the only materials collected for
recycling are paper and cardboard. An enhanced organics collection and recycling program
1204
Doc #2102859 Page 2 of 2
would add green waste, plastic, tin cans, aluminum and batteries to our existing recycling
program, and would be a positive contribution to our corporate environmental sustainability.
Six submissions were received from the eight pre-qualified service providers. Only two of the
six RFP submissions were deemed compliant, and were evaluated according to the criteria
set out in the RFP instructions. This enabled staff to determine the best value submission
received for the purpose of awarding a new janitorial services contract.
b) Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome is to ensure the provision of high quality, sustainable and cost-effective
janitorial cleaning services at all facilities maintained by the City of Maple Ridge.
c) Strategic Alignment:
The provision of janitorial services aligns with the City’s Corporate Strategic Plan objective to
manage existing municipal infrastructure through the preparation of appropriate plans to
ensure development, maintenance and renewal of community assets.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The janitorial services contract provides municipal employees, the general public and user
groups with safe, healthy and clean corporate buildings.
e) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The portion of the contract that maintains existing service levels amounts to $312,300
excluding taxes. This can be funded from the existing Facilities Operations budget, and is
within the allocated operating budget. The additional organic and recycling services will
require an increase in the annual operating budget of $12,732 plus taxes, which can be
funded by General Revenue.
CONCLUSION:
Hallmark Facility Services has provided a strong submission that represents best value to the City of
Maple Ridge for enhanced janitorial services that includes organics collection and an expanded
recycling program to promote improved corporate environmental sustainability across City facilities.
“Original signed by Michael Millward”
Prepared by: Michael Millward, PE
Facilities Operations Manager
“Original signed by David Boag”
Reviewed by: David Boag
Director of Parks and Facilities
“Original signed by Trevor Thompson”
Reviewed by: Trevor Thompson, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Financial Officer
“Original signed by Kelly Swift”
Approved by: Kelly Swift, MBA
General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture
“”Original signed by Frank Quinn for”
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
Doc # 2104938 Page 1 of 4
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: December 11, 2018
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2104938
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Albion Community Centre Budget Update and Grant Opportunity
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City of Maple Ridge has been working closely with School District No. 42 (SD42) on the public
consultation and detailed design for the c̓əsqənelə Elementary School and Albion Community Centre
(ACC) since February 2016. When this work began, a preliminary concept budget of $10 million was
established for the community centre, not including site servicing costs or portions of the project
eligible for grant funding.
Since that time, the City has completed a Class “A” cost estimate indicating that the ACC project
costs are likely to be in the region of $15.4 million. The Class “A” cost estimate is accurate within 5%
and includes all costs associated with the project including a geotechnical survey; required earth
works; full site servicing costs; off-site servicing costs; final detailed design and estimated
construction costs; and escalation costs that have occurred over this 2-year period.
As construction of the ACC has not begun, the City is eligible for a significant grant from the
federal/provincial Community, Culture and Recreation (CCR) Program. Staff recommend that the City
apply for this grant in the amount of $5 million. This would require delaying the start of construction
until the grant awards are announced, which comes with project escalation costs estimated at
$600,000. This, combined with an optional $800,000 to support LEED Silver certification, brings the
complete cost estimate for the ACC into the range of $17–18 million. A funding program to address
these costs is outlined in the Financial Implications section of this report.
Staff recommend that Council advance the site development and earth works portion of this project
to complete work requiring heavy equipment prior to Fall 2019 to reduce school disruption, and
further recommend that Council delay authorizing construction of the community centre until the
CCR grant awards are known to ensure the City’s eligibility for this fund.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the site development tendering of the Albion Community Centre project proceed at an
estimated cost of $5 million so that major site and earth works can be completed in conjunction with
the development of the c̓əsqənelə Elementary School project to reduce school disruption; and
That the construction phase of the Albion Community Centre be delayed to qualify for a Community,
Culture and Recreation grant; and
That staff submit an application to the Community, Culture and Recreation Program for up to $5
million towards construction of the Albion Community Centre; and
1205
Doc # 2104938 Page 2 of 4
That the necessary measures to obtain a LEED Silver designation or equivalent is included in the
Albion Community Centre design at an estimated cost of $800,000; and further
That the next Financial Plan Bylaw be amended as described in the December 11, 2018 Council
report named ‘Albion Community Centre Budget Update and Grant Opportunity’.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
SD42 and the City of Maple Ridge both previously acquired lands for the joint park/school
site on 104th Avenue many years ago as directed by the Official Community Plan (OCP) at that
time. The proposed addition of a community centre and the required increase in size of the
school to accommodate 660 students resulted in SD42 and the City of Maple Ridge
purchasing additional lands for this joint project.
The City received a $21,000 Green Municipal Fund grant from the Federation of Canadian
Municipalities for a study to determine the feasibility of the ACC being built as a “Net Zero”
building. The result of this study recommends that the City should instead pursue a LEED
Silver designation as there are several aspects of the building that are not compatible with
Net Zero. The cost of including design elements to support LEED Silver certification is
estimated to be $800,000.
Staff submitted a grant application for a Federal “Enabling Accessibility Fund” grant that
provides funding of up to $1 million for eligible projects to increase accessibility for people
with disabilities in communities and work places. The City was recently advised that its
application has been moved forward to the second stage for further consideration.
Staff is also preparing a Community Childcare Space Creation Program grant application,
which provides funding up to $1 million to create new licensed daycare spaces within local
government facilities. The City has applied for this grant previously and was not successful;
however, staff believes that this application will be much stronger as a result of this being a
completely new facility.
An additional grant application has been prepared for the CCR Program. This grant
opportunity provides up to 73% for eligible project costs. However, given that the entire fund
for British Columbia is $134 million, staff anticipate that it is likely that smaller amounts in
the range of $3 million to $5 million are more realistic, and have therefore provided a
recommendation to apply for funding at this level to offer options for the grant review team to
consider.
In order to meet the eligibility criteria for CCR Program, the City would need to suspend (not
terminate) the contract that it currently has with both the Construction Manager and the
Architectural firm for approximately 10 months. Both companies have confirmed that they
are willing to work with the City in this regard; however, there will be some minor additional
start-up costs to remobilize the project. We have also been advised that there is a potential
cost escalation for this project, estimated at approximately 1% for each month of the delay,
which could potentially be in the region of $600,000 assuming an 8 to 10 month delay.
Doc # 2104938 Page 3 of 4
Although there are no guarantees that the City will be awarded the amount of funding that is
being requested through the CCR Program, staff believe that the ACC project is very well
suited to the eligibility criteria for this grant.
b) Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome is to minimize the impact of cost increases while following through with
the City’s commitment to SD42 and the residents of the Albion area to work with SD42 to
develop a neighborhood learning centre that includes an elementary school, community
centre, sports field, playground and natural areas and trails.
c) Strategic Alignment:
This project is consistent with the SD42 Strategic Facilities Plan completed in 2015, the
2010 Parks, Recreation & Culture Master Plan, and the Master Agreement between the
School District and the City for the joint use of public facilities and coordination of services.
The land use is also consistent with the City’s Official Community Plan.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The City of Maple Ridge supports its citizens in maintaining healthy lifestyles through their
participation in sport, recreation, arts and culture in venues that allow them to connect with
their neighbours and other groups with common interests. This project is a great example of
partnerships and co-location of facilities to provide needed community infrastructure.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
The Parks, Recreation & Culture Division along with the Planning, Engineering and Building
Departments have been working together to expedite work on this project to keep the school
and community centre development on track. SD42 is very hopeful that c̓əsqənelə
Elementary School will open for the Fall semester in 2019.
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
In 2016 when a conceptual plan was developed for the Albion Community Centre, $10
million was set aside for this project understanding that site servicing costs were not
included and that grant opportunities were not yet known.
Since that time, servicing costs have been quantified and are significant; green building
costs have been defined through an analysis funded through a grant from the Federation of
Canadian Municipalities; and construction costs in general have escalated. This project is a
good candidate for grant opportunities which would assist in funding this project, and a
number of applications are in progress.
A recent Class “A” estimate identified a cost of $15.4 million for this project based on
detailed design completion as well as the technical reports that are now in place. LEED
Silver costs of $800,000 and a construction escalation contingency of $600,000 if the
project is delayed to support eligibility for a CCR grant brings the complete cost estimate for
the ACC into the range of $17–18 million.
The funding plan in place to accommodate the full $17-18 million project cost includes:
$10 million based on the original 2016 estimated construction cost ($8.5 million
debt and $1.5 million Amenity Contributions);
$0.75 million from Albion Community Centre land servicing/development fees; and
$2.25 million from Parks & Recreation Projects Construction Contingency.
$4-5 million in grants.
Doc # 2104938 Page 4 of 4
The next Financial Plan Bylaw Amendment Bylaw can be amended to include up to $5 million
to be funded through grants. If the grants do not achieve this amount, an increased reliance
on Community Amenity Contributions (CAC’s) would be utilized in place of grant funding.
g) Alternatives:
Council may choose to advance the entire project at this time, without the aid of this major
grant opportunity; however, staff believe that the City is in a very strong position with its
application which could provide significant financial assistance with this project.
CONCLUSIONS:
The conceptual design and community consultation for the ACC began in earnest in February 2016,
and the project has passed a variety of legislative and engineering hurdles since then. With the Class
“A” estimate in hand, the City has a more accurate understanding of the overall costs of this project.
The Community Culture and Recreation Infrastructure Grant offers a significant funding opportunity
for this project.
“Original signed by Don Cramb”
Prepared by: Don Cramb
Senior Recreation Manager
“Original signed by David Boag”
Reviewed by: David Boag
Director of Parks & Facilities
“Original signed by Trevor Thompson”
Reviewed by: Trevor Thompson, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Financial Officer
“Original signed by Kelly Swift”
Approved by: Kelly Swift, MBA
General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
“Original signed by Frank Quinn for”
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer