Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-07-02 Committee of the Whole Agenda and Reports.pdfCity of Maple Ridge COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA July 2, 2019 1:30 p.m. Council Chamber Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more information or clarification before proceeding to Council. The meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge. Chair: Acting Mayor 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 2.1 Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting of June 18, 2019 3. DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS -(10 minutes each) 4. PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Note: • Owners and/or Agents of development applications on this agenda may be permitted to speak to their item with a time limit of 10 minutes. • The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda where further debate and voting will take place, upon Council decision to forward them to that venue. 1101 2019-183-AL, 12176 237 Street, Application to Exclude Land from the Agricultural Land Reserve Staff report dated July 2, 2019 providing options for consideration pertaining to Application 2019-183-AL to exclude approximately 1.12 hectares (2.8 acres) of land from the Agricultural Land Reserve. I I Committee of the Whole Agenda July 2, 2019 Page 2 of 5 1102 2019-126-AL, 12392 248 Street, Application for Non-adhering Residential Uses in the Agricultural Land Reserve Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that Application 2019-126-AL for residential development within the Agricultural Land Reserve be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission. 1103 2019-200-AL, 13055 210 Street, Application for Non-adhering Residential Uses in the Agricultural Land Reserve Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that Application 2019-200-AL for residential development within the Agricultural Land Reserve be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission. 1104 2018-464-RZ, 11907 223 Street, RM-3 to RM-2 Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7563-2019 to rezone from RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential District) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) to permit the construction of a six-storey residential apartment with approximately 51 units be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1105 2019-090-RZ, 22090 Cliff Avenue, RS-1 to RS-1b Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7559-2019 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) to allow future subdivision into 2 lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B, E and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1106 2019-119-RZ, 12791232 Street, RS-2 to C-1 Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019 to rezone from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to CS-1 (Service Commercial) to permit a commercial development be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C and D of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. Committee of the Whole Agenda July 2, 2019 Page 3 of 5 1107 2017-489-RZ, 11917 and 11903 Burnett Street, RS-1 to RM-2 Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7407-2017 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit construction of 54 residential apartment units be given second reading as amended and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1108 2017-573-RZ, 11575, 11587 223 Street and 22300 River Road (PID 011-537-141), RS-1 to RM-2 Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7 420-2018 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit the construction of approximately 36 apartment units be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1109 2016-091-DVP, 14155 Marc Road Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-091-DVP to vary retaining wall height. 1110 2018-089-DVP, 14310 256 Street Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-089-DVP to omit the requirement to upgrade services and utilities on 256 Street. 1111 2019-210-DVP, 22768 and 22772 119 Avenue Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2019-210-DVP to vary parking from 126 stalls to 112 stalls. 1112 Award of Contract ITT-EN19-35: Dewdney Trunk Road Watermain Replacement (Edge Street to 228 Street) Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that Contract ITT-EN19-35: Dewdney Trunk Road Watermain Replacement (Edge Street to 228 Street) be awarded to Ped re Contractors Ltd., that a construction contingency be approved, that the Financial Plan be amended to increase the budget and further that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. Committee of the Whole Agenda July 2, 2019 Page 4 of 5 5. CORPORATE SERVICES 1131 2019 Community Grant Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that a community grant be awarded to the Jamia Riyadhul Jannah British Columbia Foundation. 6. PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURE 1151 Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Arts Council Proposed Bylaw Amendments Staff report dated July 2, 2019 recommending that the changes to the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Arts Council Society's bylaw be endorsed. 7. ADMINISTRATION (including Fire and Police) 8. OTHER COMMITTEE ISSUES 9. ADJOURNMENT Committee of the Whole Agenda July 2, 2019 Page 5 of 5 10. COMMUN/1Y FORUM COMMUNITY FORUM The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to speak with Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing bylaws that have not yet reached conclusion. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the individual members of Council. The total time for this Forum is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a response will be given. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings and delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca Checked b~, )) ) ~ Date: i,0/2,7 I l 4 / r City of Maple Ridge COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MINUTES June 18, 2019 The minutes of the meeting held on June 18, 2019 at 1:48 p.m. in Council Chamber of City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC. PRESENT Elected Officials: Mayor M. Morden Councillor J. Dueck Councillor C. Meadus Councillor G. Robson Councillor R. Svendsen Councillor A. Yousef ABSENT Councillor K. Duncan Appointed Staff K. Swift, Acting Chief Administrative Officer C. Carter, General Manager Planning & Development Services D. Pope, Acting General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture D. Pollock, General Manager Engineering Services L. Benson, Director of Corporate Administration Other Staff as Required D. Hall, Planner 2 R. MacNair, Senior Advisor, Bylaw and Licensing Services M. Orsetti, Manager of Bylaw & Licensing Services C. Nolan, Corporate Controller Note: These Minutes are posted on the City website at mapleridge.ca/AgendaCenter/ Video of the meeting is posted at media.mapleridge.ca/Mediasite/Showcase 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 2.1 Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting of June 4, 2019 It was moved and seconded That the minutes of the June 4, 2019 Committee of the Whole Meeting be adopted. CARRIED 3. DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS – Nil Committee of the Whole Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 2 of 4 4. PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 2019-072-AL, 12225 250 Street, Application to Exclude Land from the Agricultural Land Reserve Staff report dated June 18, 2019 providing options for consideration pertaining to Application 2019-072-AL to exclude approximately 0.987 hectares (2.4 acres) of land from the Agricultural Land Reserve. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated June 18, 2019 titled “Application to Exclude Land from the Agricultural Land Reserve 12225 250 Street” be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 25, 2019. CARRIED 1102 Proposed Cannabis Retail Store, #7-22214 Dewdney Trunk Road Staff report dated June 18, 2019 recommending that an application for a cannabis retail store by Venti Holdings Ltd. located at #7-22214 Dewdney Trunk Road not be supported. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated June 18, 2019 titled “Proposed Cannabis Retail Store at #7-22214 Dewdney Trunk Road” be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 25, 2019. CARRIED 1103 2019-164-RZ, 11678 Burnett Street, RS-1 to RM-1 Staff report dated June 18, 2019 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7552-2019 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to support a 8 unit residential townhouse development be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated June 18, 2019 titled “First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7552-2019 11678 Burnett Street” be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 25, 2019. CARRIED Committee of the Whole Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 3 of 4 1104 2018-444-RZ, 21759 River Road, RS-1 to RS-1b Staff report dated June 18, 2019 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7516-2018 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to permit a future subdivision of approximately two lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated June 18, 2019 titled “Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7516-2018 21759 River Road” be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 25, 2019. CARRIED 1105 2018-321-RZ, Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Staff report dated June 18, 2019 recommending that Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7489-2018 to integrate ‘rough-in’ electric vehicle charging infrastructure requirements be given first, second and third reading. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated June 18, 2019 titled “First, Second and Third Reading Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 7489-2018 Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure” be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 25, 2019. CARRIED 1106 23154 128 Avenue – Request for Sanitary Service Connection Outside Urban Containment Boundary Staff report dated June 18, 2019 recommending that the request to provide a sanitary service connection to 23154 128 Avenue be supported. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated June 18, 2019 titled “23154 128 Avenue - Request for Sanitary Service Connection Outside Urban Containment Boundary” be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 25, 2019. CARRIED Committee of the Whole Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 4 of 4 5. CORPORATE SERVICES 1131 2018 Annual Report and 2018 Statement of Financial Information Staff report dated June 18, 2019 recommending that the 2018 Annual Report be received and that the 2018 Statement of Financial Information be approved. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated June 18, 2019 titled “2018 Annual Report and 2018 Statement of Financial Information” be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 25, 2019. CARRIED 6. PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURE 1151 Festival Grant Program Recommendations – Intake Two Staff report dated June 18, 2019 recommending that festival support allocations for events scheduled between November 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020 be approved. Note: Councillor Robson recused himself from the meeting for the vote on this item. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated June 18, 2019 titled “Festival Grant Program Recommendations – Intake Two” be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 25, 2019. CARRIED Note: Councillor Robson returned to the meeting. 7. ADMINISTRATION (including Fire and Police) – Nil 8. OTHER COMMITTEE ISSUES – Nil 9. ADJOURNMENT – 2:29 p.m. ___________________________________ C. Meadus, Chair Presiding Member of the Committee TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: Application to Exclude Land from the Agricultural Land Reserve 12176 237 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: July 2, 2019 2019-183-AL cow An application has been received under Section 30 (1) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act to exclude approximately 1.12 hectares (2.8 acres) of land from the Agricultural Land Reserve. The applicant's submission conforms with the notice of application requirements of the Agricultural Land Commission. If this application is successful, it would be converted to urban residential uses. This property is designated Agricultural in the Official Community Plan and in the Regional Growth Strategy of Metro Vancouver. Redevelopment of this property for urban uses would be contrary to these long range plans and would require approval from municipal, regional, and provincial agencies. On this basis, this application could be considered not supportable. The recommendation of this report has been provided in accordance with Council direction for applications for exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve. However, other options for Council's consideration are presented in the Alternatives section of this report. RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with Council direction for applications for exclusions from the Agricultural Land Reserve, the following resolutions are provided for Council's consideration: ' a) That the application not be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission; b) That the application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with a summary of Council's comments and the staff report. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: RC B Enterprises Limited Legal Description: Lot: 2, Section: 21, Township: 12, Plan: NWP72342 OCP: Existing: AGR (Agricultural) Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) 1101 2019-183-AL Page 1 of 6 Surrounding Uses North: South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: b) Project Description: Rural Residential A-2 Upland Agriculture Agriculture Rural Residential RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Agricultural 3 properties, urban residential RS-1b One Family Urban Medium Density Residential Urban Residential Townhouse Residential RM-1 Townhouse Residential Urban Residential vacant urban residential 1.12 hectares (2.8 acres) 23 7th Street On-site sewer and water This application is to exclude the subject property from the Agricultural Land Reserve. The applicant intends to develop the property for residential uses to an urban standard. If excluded from the ALR, this property would require an amendment to Metro Vancouver's Regional Growth Strategy prior to urban redevelopment. c) Planning Analysis: On July 19, 2004, a report for processing exclusion applications was received by Council outlining legal implications and the local government's role in processing applications for exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve. Council resolved to consider the following options for referring applications to the Agricultural Land Commission: • The application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with no comment. • The application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with comments. • The application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with a recommendation to exclude the property with or without comments. • The application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with a recommendation to not exclude the property with or without comments. • The application not be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission. The process for decision making on applications for exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve was further refined by Council at their February 14, 2005 Workshop. At that time, Council resolved that the process for referring applications for exclusion to the Agricultural Land Commission include the following options: 2019-183-AL Page 2 of 6 a) That the application not be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission; b) That the application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with a summary of Council's comments and the staff report. The above resolution forms the recommendations presented in this staff report. To assist Council in the decision of allowing this application to proceed further, this development proposal will be reviewed in light of the policies of the Official Community Plan and the Agricultural Plan. OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN The Official Community Plan, adopted by Council on November 14, 2006, provides a policy context that has relevance to this application, and the agricultural future of the subject property. The following outlines some of the relevant sections from the Official Community Plan. Official Community Plan Agricultural Policies The Maple Ridge Official Community Plan emphasizes the value of agriculture in contributing to the local economy and to the rural character of the community. It is noted that Maple Ridge agriculture faces considerable challenges, but there is consistent community support for local farming. Policy 6-12 of the Official Community Plan states: Maple Ridge will protect the productivity of its agricultural land by: a) Adopting a guiding principal of "positive benefit to agriculture" when making land use decisions that could affect the agricultural , land base, with favourable recognition of initiatives including but not limited to supportive non-farm uses, infrastructure improvements for farmland, or the inclusion of land elsewhere in the Agricultural Land Reserve: b) requiring agricultural impact assessments (A/As) and Groundwater Impact Assessment of non-farm development and infrastructure projects and identifying measures to off-set impacts on agricultural capability; c) preserving larger farm units and areas by using appropriate buffers such as roads, topographic features, watercourses, ditching, fencing, or gradually reduced residential densities on properties adjacent to agricultural land; d) discouraging the subdivision of agricultural land into smaller parcels, except where positive benefits to agriculture can be demonstrated; e) reinforcing the concept that the Agricultural Land Reserve is intended for agricultural use by increasing the minimum lot size for ALR properties that are zoned Rural Residential; f) encouraging the amalgamation of smaller parcels of farmland into larger, more cohesive parcels. Section 6.2 of the Official Community Plan, which pertains to Agricultural opportunities. states that the value of agriculture is consistently recognized and supported within the community, as follows: Agricultural land is a key component of the Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy and provides many benefits of local and regional significance. As an economic generator it contributes to a more complete community. 2019-183-AL Page 3 of 6 Official Community Plan -Growth Management Policies Section 2.1 of the Official Community Plan states that in Maple Ridge the majority of the growth in population, jobs and housing will be accommodated within the Urban Area Boundary where services are readily available or infrastructure is already in place. The subject property forms the legal boundary of the Agricultural Land Reserve at this location. The Official Community Plan emphasized that adjustments to the Urban Area Boundary, if required, must follow a specified process. Although additional adjustments may occur in the future, this process was generally concluded, thereby clarifying the location of the Urban Area Boundary, through the completion of the Maple Ridge Agricultural Plan in 2009 and the adoption of the Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy in 2011. The 2 parcels to the south of the subject property have both been excluded (12146 237th & 12102 237th Street) from the Agricultural Land Reserve since the 2006 adoption of the Official Community Plan. They were included in an amendment to Metro Vancouver's Livable Region Strategic Plan from Agriculture to an Urban Designation, and subsequently, they were both designated urban in the Regional Growth Strategy. This amendment process was lengthy, and involved collaboration between the agencies involved (Metro Vancouver and member municipalities, and the ALC). The subject property was not part of this amendment process, and for this reason, the urban development of the subject property is not supportable. AGRICULTURAL PLAN The Maple Ridge Agricultural Plan, adopted by Council on December 15, 2009, provided additional direction for advancing agricultural opportunities in Maple Ridge. Although adopted, specific actions related to the implementation of the Plan are currently being prioritized by Council. Pertinent excerpts of the Plan are included below. Issue 1 in the Agricultural Plan notes the difficulty faced by farmers in gaining access to underutilized agricultural land. Specific issues included the following: • Absentee landlords • Agricultural land held in idle state • Landless operators unable to find land to farm • High land cost restricts access. The Plan indicates that an appropriate means to address these issues would be to encourage non-farming land owners to make idle land available to farmers or to start farming it themselves. The Plan notes the need to re-emphasize the role of agriculture in the Agricultural Land Reserve and to address the perception that the Agricultural Land Reserve is a land reserve for eventual non-agricultural development in Maple Ridge. Issue 5 of the Agricultural Plan discusses the loss of the agricultural land base and notes the following specific issues: • Many small parcels • High level of rural residential incursion into Agricultural Land Reserve • Non-farmed areas of the Agricultural Land Reserve tend to be smaller parcels • Limited availability of irrigation water • Continued conversion pressure from the District of Maple Ridge's urban growth • Financial pressure on farming 2019-183-AL Page 4 of 6 The Agricultural Plan recognizes that there may be situations in the future where exclusions may be required to meet community needs, for example employment generating lands. In instances where land conversion is unavoidable, levies or other means may be established by the City in order to compensate for the loss of agricultural land. Goal 6 of the Plan discusses the issue of the conversion of agricultural land as follows: The primary goal with respect to larger established farming operations in Maple Ridge is to plan for their retention as farms, rather than watch them languish and deteriorate, so that the community can optimize the rewards and advantages of having agriculture in its midst. Limited to highly specific situations, the secondary goal (if the primary goal is not feasible) is to explore establishing a policy of compensation from development that enables funds to be generated and expended so that the net agricultural capability of the District is enhanced by investment elsewhere. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES Agricultural Land Commission The Commission has established guidelines for local governments regarding the timing of application processing. These guidelines are provided by the Commission in their document, the Agricultural Land Reserve Use. Subdivision And Procedure Regulation. The local government is normally required to address the application within 60 days of its receipt under Section 21.1 of this Regulation, but has an option to hold a public meeting which would extend the application processing time to 90 days. Metro Vancouver The subject property is designated for Agricultural use in the Official Community Plan. If the property was excluded from the Agricultural Land Reserve, its Agricultural designation would remain in the Official Community Plan. Any change in permitted uses would require an amendment to the Official Community Plan, which in turn would require the approval of Metro Vancouver to amend the Regional Growth Strategy. This type of amendment would be considered by Metro Vancouver to be a Type 2 Minor Amendment. The bylaw amendment process would include a regional public hearing and a two-thirds weighted vote of the Metro Vancouver Board. In this instance, the municipal government would apply for the amendment to Metro Vancouver. d) Alternatives: The report recommendations follow Council direction as noted earlier in this report. The property has not been identified for exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve, and is not considered available for urban development in the Regional Growth Strategy. On this basis, this application could be considered not supportable. 2019-183-AL Page 5 of 6 ....... _ ...... _____ ............ ,___ N Scale: 1 :3,000 12301 1221, ' I I I I I I ' I 12161 I I I I 12099 Legend -Stream ' I ' l ' I I ' I I r .. 122,0 '1 1 I ' I I 12176 12146 12102 .... "' N ~~ ~ ~ ---Ditch Centreline Indefinite Creek -Lake or Reservoir 1208 AVE. 0 0 ~ ~ ~ Jc ~ 1' \ \ 12090 12oso <! 1' g ! I f:j APPENDIX A ---------------12111 12085 12077 12073 12()6.9 12057 ~ ~ ~ N "' i ~ ~ 12055 120BAVE. ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 1' ~ ~ ~ N 1' ::: 120A lANE ~ 1' 12176 237 STREET PIO: 004-588-347 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~·-·· mapleridge.ca , FILE: 2019-183-AL DATE: May 23, 2019 BY:PC ' --• [_ N Scale: 1 :3,000 C: 0 "ui <n APPENDIX B 12176 237 STREET PIO: 004-588-347 ~1--------------------t .... U~;±f±:MWttl~-1-"J,-7-=7~rl 0 FILE: 2019-183-AL DATE: May 23, 2019 BY: PC City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: FILE NO: July 2, 2019 2019-126-AL cow FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: SUBJECT: Application for non-adhering residential uses in the Agricultural Land Reserve 12392 248 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This application is for residential development within the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR). The applicant cannot proceed with this development proposal unless it is approved by the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC). The applicant had been working on the development proposal in compliance with Farm Home Plate regulations and met with municipal staff to review the development plans. The ALC regulations for residential development were changed prior to an application for a building permit being made. This proposal generally complied with existing regulations when it was initiated and therefore is found to be supportable. However, a variance may be required to approve the attached garage structure due to its size. RECOMMENDATION: That Application 2019-126-AL respecting property located at 12392 248 Street, be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Zoning: Existing: Surrounding Uses North: South: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Ronnie Bhala Section: 23, Township: 12 AGR (Agricultural) RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Vacant RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Agricultural Rural Residential RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Agricultural 1102 Page 1 of 4 f- East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: b) Project Description: Rural Residential RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Agricultural Rural Residential RS-3 One Family Rural Residential & RS-1 One Family Urban Residential Agricultural Vacant Rural residential 2.023 ha (5 acres) 248th Street Municipal water, septic This application is for a principal dwelling with a total floor area of 650 square metres (6,996 square feet). Prior to making a building permit, the applicant was working on a development plan that met the regulations for the Farm Home Plate in Maple Ridge. However, the building permit application was not made prior to the changed ALC regulations, which imposed greater restrictions on house size. For this reason, the applicant is seeking ALC approval to realize this development plan, which was underway prior to the changed regulations. Generally, this proposal complies with the regulations of the Farm Home Plate. However, the size of the attached garage structures exceeds the maximum specified in the Zoning Bylaw. If the ALC approves this application, the applicant will have the option of revising the plan or seeking a variance prior to issuance of a building permit. c) Planning Analysis: Agricultural Land Commission: The provincial government introduced Bill 52 on Nov. 5, 2018 and the changes officially took effect on Feb. 22, 2019. A key change includes reducing the size of homes built on ALR land. Primary residences are now restricted to less than 500 square metres (5,400 square feet) under the new regulations. In addition, only one detached dwelling is permitted, although it can also have a secondary suite. Other residential uses that were previously permitted conditionally such as temporary residential uses, detached garden suites, or farm help housing now require approval through the ALC prior to issuance of a building permit. With this change, the ALC has also placed further restrictions on the amount of fill that can be brought on site. For residential uses, the maximum area of landscape alteration is now 1000 m2, (10,764 square feet) significantly less than the previous threshold of 2000 m2 (21,528 square feet) Page 2 of 4 Zoning Bylaw: All properties will be required to meet both municipal zoning regulations (farm home plate) and ALC regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. The table below compares the 2 sets of regulations. Use ALC Bill 52 Zoning Bylaw (Farm Home Plate) Detached Non adhering residential use Permitted conditionally garden application required suite Temporary Non adhering residential use Conditional use, manufactured Residential application required home, restrictive covenant required Use Employee Non adhering residential use 279 m2 (3,003 square feet) Residential application required maximum footprint, need farm Use status, restrictive covenant, Council resolution requiring ALC approval Principal 500 m2 (5,400 square feet) 650 m2 (6,996 square feet), includes Dwelling maximum, below ground basements attached garages and attached garages up to 42 m2(452 square feet). Residential Maximum landscape disturbance of 2000 m2, (21,528 square feet) to be Footprint 1000 m2, (10,764 square feet) located within 60 m (197 feet) of including foundations and driveways, fronting street located anywhere on the lot. Development proposals would need to resolve conflicts with these regulations through a variance and/ or through an application to the ALC, depending on the nature of the conflict. This application is one of the first under these new regulations. In this case, it is clear that the applicant intended to develop the property in compliance with Zoning Bylaw regulations but did not complete the application process before ALC regulations changed. For this reason, this application is supportable. d) Intergovernmental Issues: The initiatives of the ALC and the City to limit residential development in the ALR have emerged out of a commitment to retain agricultural land for agricultural purposes. The municipal farm home plate regulations were completed earlier, and it may make sense in the future to amend the Zoning Bylaw to more closely align these two sets of regulations. e) Citizen/Customer Implications: The measures taken to limit residential development in the ALR are intended to assist the agricultural community by reducing the competition for agricultural land by those interested in estate residential development. Those interested in estate residential development will continue to have options in properties that are designated Rural Residential and Estate Suburban. Page 3 of 4 I I I I 12541 ,, i 12538 APPENDIX A -) I : !'~-----, \ ~12~s1o ___ Ll_--,,;;;;_;;;;_;-;;;_;:;;_;;;;_~.-;;;;.;;.iiiii_.b..---~_,-...J..~~~--1_J__ __ T I ... _ 12519 12465 i I 12,7s I I I I I I I I I I iL--------1 I 12434 I ! iL__--~--~--~--=-----1 I I I ~ I , 12423 ; .,,-, I I 12404 SUB/JECT PROPERTY ,_,,. _____ , I ..,. _______________ ,u; _______________ ., ------I \ I ·--~---' f: ;!; I I I I 12377 12323 12295 12287 ----------12392 I I I '"'' ~. ~ I I 12356 I I I I I I I • I 12304 I I • I I I J \ 12296 I ~ ~ 12275 ' I ;!; ;!; I I 12263 I 12266 12248 I 1 • I.__ __ _. 12240 ---~--I I I I I I 12265 ; ·-·---1! ----12260 --... ----\ I I ----12392 248 STREET Legend -Stream ---Ditch Centreline Scale: 1 :3,000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT [di-Illa FILE: 2019-126-AL DATE: Apr 8, 2019 mapleridge.ca BY: PC Scale: 1 :3,000 APPENDIX 8 12392 248 STREET PLANNING DEPARTMENT mapleridge.ca FILE: 2019-126-AL DATE: Apr 8, 2019 BY: PC APPENDIXC TO: FROM: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: July 2, 2019 2019-200-AL cow SUBJECT: Application for non-adhering residential uses in the Agricultural Land Reserve 13055 210 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This application is for residential development within the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR). The applicant has been challenged due to changing regulations during the application process. The 2016 introduction of Farm Home Plate regulations in the Zoning Bylaw entailed that their development plan exceeded maximum requirements for house size and for the footprint that was to be devoted to residential uses. To address these non-conformities, the applicant was granted Board of Variance Approval to proceed. However, as the building permit was being processed, the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) introduced their new regulations for house size, a maximum of 500 square meters (5,400 square feet), which was considerably smaller than the maximum specified in the Zoning Bylaw. For this reason, the applicant cannot proceed with this development proposal unless approved by the ALC. As this proposal complied with existing regulations when it was initiated, it is felt to be supportable. RECOMMENDATION: That Application 2019-200-AL, respecting property located at 13055 210 Street, be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Karamjeet S Gill Legal Description: Lot: 1, D.L.: 262, Section: 25, Township: 9, Plan: NWP3512 OCP: Existing: AGR (Agricultural) Zoning: Existing: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) 1103 Page 1 of 4 Surrounding Uses North: Use: South: East: West: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: b) Project Description: Agriculture A-2 Upland Agriculture Agricultural Farm, Rural Residential A-2 Upland Agriculture Agricultural Farm, Rural Residential A-2 Upland Agriculture Agricultural Vacant A-2 Upland Agriculture Agricultural Farm, Rural Residential Farm, Rural Residential 3.7 Ha (9.25 acres) 210th Street Municipal water, septic This application is for a principal dwelling with a total floor area of 750 square metres (8,073 square feet). The development history of the site dates to 2016, with the applicant seeking to place a manufactured home on the property that could initially function as a principal dwelling, and then be considered a temporary residential use by a relative, once a larger house (principal dwelling) was built on the property. The Maple Ridge Farm Home Plate regulations were adopted in late 2016, which rendered the site house plans non-conforming with respect to Zoning. A variance was granted to waive the conflicts with the Farm Home Plate regulations at the August 2, 2017 Board of Variance meeting. The Building Permit was not issued prior to the changed ALC regulations, which imposed greater restrictions on house size. For this reason, the applicant is seeking ALC approval to realize this development plan, which has been in progress since 2016. c) Planning Analysis: Agricultural Land Commission: The provincial government introduced Bill 52 on Nov. 5, 2018 and the changes officially took effect on Feb. 22, 2019. A key change includes reducing the size of homes built on ALR land. Primary residences are now restricted to less than 500 square metres (5,400 square feet) under the new regulations. In addition, only one detached dwelling is permitted, although it can also have a secondary suite. Other residential uses that were previously permitted conditionally such as temporary residential uses, detached garden suites, or farm help housing now require approval through the ALC prior to issuance of a building permit. With this change, the ALC has also placed further restrictions on the amount of fill that can be brought on site. For residential uses, the maximum area of landscape alteration is now 1000 m2, (10,764 square feet) significantly less than the previous threshold of 2000 m2 (21,528 square feet). Page 2 of 4 1--· Zoning Bylaw: All properties will be required to meet both municipal zoning regulations (farm home plate) and ALC regulations prior to issuance of a building permit. The table below compares the 2 sets of regulations. Use ALC Bill 52 Zoning Bylaw (Farm Home Plate) Detached Non adhering residential use Permitted garden application required suite Temporary Non adhering residential use Conditional use, manufactured Residential application required home, restrictive covenant required Use Employee Non adhering residential use 279 m2 (3,003 square feet) Residential application required maximum footprint, need farm Use status, restrictive covenant, Council resolution requiring ALC approval Principal 500 m2 (5,400 square feet) 650 m2 (6,996 square feet), includes Dwelling maximum, below ground basements attached garages and attached garages up to 42 m2(452 square feet). Residential Maximum landscape disturbance of 2000 m2, (21,528 square feet) to be Footprint 1000 m2, (10,764 square feet) located within 60 m (197 feet) of including foundations and driveways, fronting street located anywhere on the lot. Development proposals would need to resolve conflicts with these regulations through a variance and/ or through an application to the ALC, depending on the nature of the conflict. This application is one of the first under these new regulations. In this case, it is clear that the applicant intended to develop the property in compliance with Zoning Bylaw regulations but did not complete the application process before ALC regulations changed. For this reason, this application is supportable. d) Intergovernmental Issues: The initiatives of the ALC and the City to limit residential development in the ALR have emerged out of a commitment to retain agricultural land for agricultural purposes. The municipal farm home plate regulations were completed earlier, and it may make sense in the future to amend the Zoning Bylaw to more closely align these two sets of regulations. e) Citizen/Customer Implications: The measures taken to limit residential development in the ALR are intended to assist the agricultural community by reducing the competition for agricultural land by those interested in estate residential development. Those interested in larger estates will continue to have options in properties that are designated Rural Residential and Estate Suburban. Page 3 of 4 I j ~! t?. 11 I I I I I I ~~~===-=====~' N Scale: 1 :4,000 ----------------------------Legend --Canal Edge --· Ditch Centreline -Edge of River -----· Edge of Marsh Canal -Lake or Reservoir L'*·:;~ Marsh -River FILE: 2019-200-AL DATE: Jun 3, 2019 APPENDIX A 13055 210 St PLANNING DEPARTMENT mapleridge.ca BY: MC N Scale: 1 :4,000 FILE: 2019-200-AL DATE: Jun 3, 2019 APPENDIX 8 13055 210 St PLANNING DEPARTMENT mapleridge.ca BY: MC APPENDIXC l TO: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: July 2, 2019 FILE NO: 2018-464-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C o W SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7563-2019 11907 223 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 11907 223 Street, from RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential District) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) to permit the future construction of a six-storey residential apartment with approximately 51 units. The applicant is proposing an increase in base density from 1.8 floor space ratio (FSR) to 2.36 FSR; therefore, a site specific text amendment, using a density bonus, will be required to the RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) zone. In accordance with Council's draft density bonus regulations, the proposed additional density can be achieved through a cash contribution, currently determined at $96.88 per m2 ($9.00 per ft2). To proceed further with this application additional information is required, as outlined below. As per Council Policy 6.31, which was updated December 12, 2017 to remove the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program exemption for properties situated within the Town Centre Area Plan boundaries, a CAC charge of approximately $158,100.00 applies to this proposed development ($3,100 per unit for apartment dwellings). RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan (OCP), Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; 2. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7563-2019 be given first reading; and 1104 Page 1 of 6 3. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Bissky Architecture and Urban Design Inc. Lot 4 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 8380 Low-Rise Apartment Low-Rise Apartment RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential District) RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) Apartment RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential District) Low-Rise Apartment Single Family Residential RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential District) Low-Rise Apartment Commercial C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Flexible Mixed-Use Apartment RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential District) Low-Rise Apartment Vacant Multi-Family Apartment 0.18 ha (0.43 acres) Lane north of 119 Avenue Urban Standard The subject property, located at 11907 223 Street, is located at the southwest corner of 223 Street and 119 Avenue. The property is flat with trees located around the perimeter, along with grasses and low lying shrubs located throughout. Japanese Knotweed, an invasive species, has also been identified on the subject property and will require removal as part of development. The subject property is currently vacant (see Appendices A and B). c) Project Description: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential District) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) to permit the Page 2 of 6 construction of a six-storey building consisting of 51 apartment units and 60 concealed parking spaces. A portion of the second storey over the parking level below will be a rooftop amenity space. Access to the parking will be from the lane along the northern edge of the site. The property has historical RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential District) zoning that is intended for dense high-rise buildings. This density is based on building height for each storey built above the fifth storey, to achieve the permitted density in the RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential District) zone (e.g. FSR == 1.2 plus 0.2 for each storey 6 to 10). Instead, the applicant is seeking to rezone and apply the RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) zone requirements with an FSR of 2.36 within a six-storey structure. This will require a site specific text amendment, using a density bonus, for an increase of 0.56 FSR over the maximum permitted FSR of 1.8 (for the RM-2 zone). A further variance in the maximum building height, from four to six storeys, is also required to accommodate this project. The proposed RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) zone is consistent with the Low-Rise Apartment designation within Town Centre Area Plan in the Official Community Plan (OCP), thus rezoning to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) would bring the property into compliance with the policies of OCP and the Town Centre Area Plan. At this time, the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the OCP and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject property is located within the Downtown West Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan. As outlined in the Development Permit Area Guidelines of the OCP, this precinct "is an important central downtown neighbourhood, and could grow to accommodate boutique retail, arts and culture centres, and tourism related services such as hotels and small scale conference centres, in addition to multi-family residential development." The subject property is designated Low-Rise Apartment, and as stated in Policy 3-22: "is intended for developmet in a three (3) to five (5) storey apartment form where units are accessed from an internal corridor and residential parking is provided underground." An OCP amendment is required to accommodate the proposed six-storey structure. The following policies apply to this proposal: 3-1 An increase in residential and commercial density is encouraged in the Town Centre[ ... ] Land-use should include a mix of housing types catering to various demographics, including affordable and special needs housing, within walking distance to a broad mixture of uses, including shops, services, cultural facilities, and recreation. This project increases the residential density by introducing up to 51 units, including 11 one-bedroom units, 34 two-bedroom units, and 6 three-bedroom units. The subject property is located within walking distance to a range of shops, services, parks and the Haney Place Transit Exchange. Page 3 of 6 3-12 High density development that is four or more storeys in height may be required to include a shadow study in consideration of adjacent sites to address potential impacts on available daylight. This project will potentially have shadow impacts on the adjacent properties to the north and east of the site. The applicant will be asked to provide a shadow study. In addition to these policies, a range of environmentally sustainable policies in the Town Centre Area Plan would also apply to this application: 2-5 Incorporating Rainwater Management practices into on-site and off-site development will be encouraged[ ... ]. Some examples of Rainwater Management practices include: • bioretention areas; • rainwater gardens; • bioswales; • landscaped curb bulges on street right-of-ways; • rainwater harvest for irrigation; and • green roofs. 2-9 The use of plant and tree species that are suited for Maple Ridge climate and that will attract local songbirds and pollinating insects species [ ... ] will be encouraged in public and private development; 2-10 Landscaping, as described in policy 2-9 above, will be encouraged in all public and private outdoor spaces in the Town Centre. For areas with a large amount of paved surfaces, such as surface parking lots and public plazas, the installation of trees, rain gardens, raised planters, and/or living green walls, where feasible, is encouraged to provide some areas of refuge for wildlife, such as small birds, rainwater interception, cooling in summer months, reduced glare from pavement, carbon sequestration, and a more attractive urban environment. The applicant will be required to provide some of these measures as part of the development. Housing Action Plan: The City's Housing Action Plan (HAP) was endorsed by Council in 2014. It seeks to increase access to "safe, affordable, and appropriate housing that meets the diverse and changing needs of the community". The HAP also speaks of the need to provide a range of non-market, affordable and special needs housing. This was reaffirmed with the endorsement of the Housing Action Plan Implementation Framework in September, 2015. The subject application does provide a mix of unit size, including one, two, and three bedroom units. Further details on unit type (accessible units, special needs housing, etc.) will be included in the second reading report. Citywide Community Amenity Program: The City-wide Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program, approved by Council on March 14, 2016 and amended on December 14, 2017, applies to this project. A voluntary contribution of $3,100 per apartment unit, totalling $158,100.00, is required for this project before final reading. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential District) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) (see Appenix C) to permit Page 4 of 6 1 I --1 the construction of a six-storey apartment building with approximately 51 units (see Appendices D and E). A site specific text amendment, using a density bonus, is required to increase the maximum allowable density within the RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) zone from 1.8 to 2.36 FSR. Based on Council's draft density bonus regulations, additional density can be achieved in exchange for a cash contribution, currently determined at $96.88 per m2 ($9.00 per ft2). Recent discussions with Council have also noted that that there is a preference for cash-in-lieu rather than the direct provision of rental units. Any density bonus contributions received are intended to help fund the creation of future affordable housing in the community. Further details of the density bonus contribution for this application will form part of the second reading report to Council. Reductions to all setbacks and an increase in height are also being requested and will be evaluated in the context of the Downtown West Precinct Development Permit Guidelines. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application, and will be subject of a future report to Council. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.11 of the OCP, a Town Centre Development Permit (Downtown West Precinct) application is required for all multi-family residential, flexible mixed use and commercial development located in the Town Centre. Advisory Design Panel: A Development Permit is required and the development must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. e) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Fire Department; c) Building Department; d) Parks Department; e) School District; f) Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; and g) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. Page 5 of 6 (/) (") Ill ro N 0 0 0 0 "Tl )> --l ::;; m .. .. N zo 0 ~ < ex, ex,./,. -0) N .i:,. O' ~ ::0 ex, N ~ r "U z[> I )> ~ <" CD )> "O ~ (") 0) -o· ::::; (/) ..-.. :::0 ~ 0 0 -0 < -0 ---- I • I 0 ;::;: (") =s- o CD ::::; -ro ::::; CD "1J i;: z ""' z G) 0 m ~ ~ ;s: m z --i r ct) c.c ct) :s 0. ~ ~ (0 0 """ N N w (J) ...... ~ ~ ... ~ 22234 22238 22242 22246 22286 ... ~ 22320 22334 22336/42 22344/50 22356 I (/) m r ~ ;u ;,;: ~ [Tl 22213 22241 22259 ... ... ~ ... 22313 22315 22321 22327 22337 22175 ... ... co ~ ... ~ " 223 ST. 22347/55 22363 ... ... CX) f2 :::i~ 22222 22256 ... ... co CX) " ... ... <o 0 ... 0)0, 0) co 22310 22318120 22324126 22362 22366 22370 ~ ~ (0 ~ rn · 22168 ... ... <o ... 0) 22225 22241 22235 ... ... <o 0 " 22311 22323 22335 22343 222 ST. I LL.:f'I0/41 22361 22363/67 22371177 ... ~ ... ... <o I\) 0) f--- ... ... :e 0, ... ... <o .... ... r- (/) C OJ c.... m () --1 "U ;:u 0 "U m ;:u ~ ~ ~ to i=± ...,:e .... 2230; 104 22301 /18 2232• /36 223:x 2236( 170 ... ... <o 0, ... ... ... <o g: t---- ... ... <o 0, " ;;::: 0 z d (/) :c ~ [Tl ~ <o ~ 22.2 ST. ... ... <o 0) to ...... --1--<o <o 0, 0) 0 CX) 22311 /15 22325 22335 22353/55 22365 ... ... <o ~ 22182 22214 22248 22250/54 22264/68 22276192 22298 223 ST. 22302112 22316 22326/34 22336/38 22342148 22350 22356/62 22364 1 170 22~ 22195 22207/09 22219 22225i27 -F ~ X XXXX> ~AA~ x x Xx ;?< x; ><)<N X X>Q<; N 0 ..... """ I 0 , ~, I l )> ~ "'"'~ ~ ~ '. -0 __.,_...::.. ....... ~ -0 N rr, I ll ~ Scale: 1 :2,000 APPENDIX B 11907 223 St PLANNING DEPARTMENT "-----~ ........ --1.CJ!a FILE: 2018-464-RZ DATE: Nov 8, 2018 mapleridge.ca BY: LP CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7563-2019 APPENDIXC A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7563-2019." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 4 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 8380 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1803 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of READ a second time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of ,20 , 20 ,20 , 20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this ,20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 day of PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 11 00 D " ~I "' w 0, I l::: N ~ ~ N f:l N A P3175 3374 262 P3175 S 100· 11965 4 11951 0 5 11941 P 11291 6 " l::: 11929 ..,. ~ <a l::: l::: 2 68 P6 550 31 .... <a l::: 32 "' .... l::: 0 I'--11901 l{) (\J a.. 69 11867 242 P62478 BCP 5928 (lease) 11841 ,-: <I) N f:l <( ~ N P20094 2 <( ...J 0, & (L ;; N N EP 54063 EP49989 RP 59105 ~ "' 1;1'fi. IE"' ,-Re~ "I'--,1,2 ~ ~ E f:l ~ as l:;i E ~& 2 f:l ''A" ,-,-~-E~ 8978 P70168 E,.... P63 5 NI/VS 2870 (l)C.. o:::w NI/VS 3233 11980 Pd. 121 11963 79 NI/VS 418 97 P36157 11960 11957 H 6 P8148 P 16304 11933 2 5 P8148 P6076 11926 11925 P81 8 (P8380) 8380 4 3"' 2 AofA "' 4 f:l ~ ~ 11916 f:l l::: 11907 N <a 1 B f:l 5 4E 3 11887 P78577 f:l NI/VS 2948 p 808 2 11869 ,-: A A <I) A ~ NWS2762 NI/VS 2611 (P6808) 1511857 P76483 P74121 "' 0, ;; " "' 16 " f:l f:l f:l 11841 <a " "' N <a ~ ~ " " 17 ~ 22f:l 21f:l 20f:l 19f:l P68 8 18 to p 808 61 10 ~ A 0, 0, "' 29~ 30 31 32 0, N ~ " ~ "' 0. N " N f:l f:l f:l f:l P25783 LOUGHEED HWY. ~ .... I'--~ Oo. • 27.,.... a.. E -~ .... a.. ,-& r---.... :;; st~ ~ a.. "' Wf:l l::: DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. \_EP9471 P61856 <a <Xl 0 N "' ..,. l{) "' ~~ ~ N ~ f:l I B~ ~ NC.. l::: ;ls ~12 11 §8 ~51-6 ~5 a.. N 7 P3 06 p 06 *LMP4261 (\J 13 ~1 11968 & F §' qg 11950 ~~ "' (\J ' ~ 14;;;"' "' (') ~ ~, . " a.. ~ f:l " ~ N RP52529 Pd."C" fil 11955 ~ MCINTOSH AVE. a.. N "' " 11924 g'<r /42 ~~ ~~ ~<a ~~ "D" NI/VS l{) 01~ (') 0 0 a.. ,-~ a.. o..;;;+c f:l ~ A" 11868 176 (P63 1 qe CD I'--a.. PP069 Pd.'A' "' ~ f:l 0 ~ B~ f:l 6306 ) C i'ii l{) CD (\J a.. 2: _J 16 D P3206 P3 06 38 39 .... s ;ii "'"' "'" ;;>; "'"' N <'< f:l N <'< 119AVE. 4 41 ~42 t:: ~"' ~ <a <a .... "'"' "' N <'< N N N N 44 11915/19 E (P3206) 11909 <a 0 <a .... "' "' ~6~ 7 8 ~ P28 9 1. 5 tr'---'";;;'=-'---::1-·<ei LMP t LMP9543 Rem10 ] P28·9 15 14..., (BCS2743 11867 N 119 B ;! A 1.51 11863 65 "' "' ;; .... .... :l 106 ~ ;;; ;;; ~ ~ ;;>; "' "' P53381 a, f:l f:l f:l f:l f:l f:l f:l 11855 SELKIRK AVE. "O ~ ,--.I 0 " <a __,. ~ "' ti " 0 ~ 29 (0 Pd.1 f:l Pd.D ~ o..~ 25~ 26f:l 27 28 11841 a.."' ;;>; RP 61574 . ~ 11841 P2899) 24" f:l 11830 LMP45732(1ease CD C'l .... B 3801 cir---42~ (P2899) ~ ~ ~ 'A' st~ ;:; .... (I) 0. g LP77916 ~"' (\J ;;>; *PP081 ~ ~ a. :S:5 f:l f:l MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia 7563-2019 1803 RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential District) RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) 6 N SCALE 1:2,500 I I f 3--'lJ w ~ e a. ................. ~..__ .. , ... P•"'"""'""<>a,1-<,N><e..,,l_.,,,....,,. • .,,,,,. ......... , .... ~,, ... ..., .. ..,, ... .,,,.,...,....,..., ~,,,... .. ., .,. . .,..,,,., ...... , ...... ...,.. ,.., ;i#:~D.~~.'£:-4f:.f ~~.€~ we Yd MN ld :oMN :aono :w '~'"'P~1T5•1 .::~..::..:;::.-:-:.:'.::~:";;~~·*·;.::::: :,g•o&,,}!01d•;<11•••1S£~i·LOOII :m,ppv~w:i ! : ~:;o-.;":..;"D ... ~;~;:~ ~:" .;"'.;;=, I l ABO f.11we::1-111n.,..1 r-asodoJ .,_,,,_.., I ' , , " C l'.Jci p d 8 <( -0 <( 0 CX) (") CX) C: co ii ~.,·-,,.~;I~,-·•• ·:.i:~h &!·:~ .• i' ~ : ~ ~ ue1d e11s © II APPENDIX D ..c -CJ) ..-..- ,.._.,.,,•..,~-,.,-....., l~~·tOO·\lC ..................... """' .............. p,-,..,.. ::::~:;.·~~"":::L-::::~.::'::. ~-"~'"o~""""" "'"'~'"" 1 :£:"~.!:.:";~=~:.:=': I :;ie·~ill>•H~1dC1~·i;,a.1sttz·trJ611 , .. ~,PPII""'::> 1 ' ·-= -' • ,~, ""' ~ .. ·· -~· . ·l Aaa ,lpwe:i-111nV1J s-V'J~ pasodOJd 1 I ,........,,oll ...... J I I • ~-... , ,,,, ... ,,,.... .. , , .... . o:,;:,-,. .. n1, .. ,c.:u·,1.-r,i"' .. ·}:~:,.ir""':".-1aa~s JaAO:::J .,'.."llS~CI l!OrnH:>.I '..);>,;I.S::-.'V.~I I :J:--1 :,,.'..)1S"m Js:VH:1:1·\/ ~ll,1DJJlll)l'IV ' I lg A>ISSlfl N3Hd315 3N,WM I~ 11 l! lo! C> 0 <{ i APPEND XE E o· u:: s z 0 i' Q) > (:-) ....., ... ., ... ..,._._,, ---... """-'""'"'-.. __ ._..,....,,,......,..,.,.,,.,,~ ... -· "''"°'""'""'_. __ ...., ....... ._,, .. "!ISM I>"'"""°' -.... l""I~ !;J,1 ..,.,,.,..._,,.,.,.14'°"""'JO.,..•P,-dn.,J ....... .....,, ... ~, .. --i... ....... .., !OW"'-~-,-·~ ... ~-"""' ·o.o:,o,,-,,.,t.,~w,...,.:souJ,,..;,,.,_o._ .... """'"'""''""''"'"""""."''"'--·--· ..... , ....... &·,&.!-• -·-~,O'{t~!"'l'9:xll'f'<O-· 08£8d~\N1d :aMN :86~ ,a :,11 :ssa•PP'li•!lol s5upapua~ N'.)1510 110111UNI '.)NINN'lld .JNI N'.)1Sl0 N\1911() ~ l~()lJ]llHJ~V A>ISS18 N3HdUS 3NAVM ~ ctl >-t :::J 0 u Cf) Cf) 0 ti <( ~ (lJ > ci <l'. I- City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: July 2, 2019 FILE NO: 2019-090-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Co W SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7559-2019 22090 Cliff Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 22090 Cliff Avenue, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential), to future subdivide the property into 2 lots. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. Pursuant to Council policy, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution Program, where a voluntary contribution will be requested. For single family residential subdivisions proposing fewer than 3 lots, only the original is exempt, after which the CAC program applies to additional lots. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7559-2019 be given first reading; and That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B, E and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: True Light Building & Development Ltd True Light Building & Development Ltd Lot 46 except part subdivided by plan 3707 4, District Lot 397, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 9218 RES (Urban Residential) RES (Urban Residential) RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) 1105 Page 1 of 5 Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Park RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) Conservation and Park Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Residential Residential 0.13 HA. (0.32 acres) Cliff Avenue Urban Standard The subject property, located at 22090 Cliff Avenue, is approximately 0.13 hectare (0.32 acres) in area, and is mostly flat around the existing residence, with a significantly sloped area of about 23 meters in the backyard, connected to a larger ridge. The subject property is bounded by residential properties to the north, east and west, Cliff Avenue to the north, and a park to the south. The property is located within the Fraser River Escarpment Area plan. c) Project Description: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential), to permit future subdivision into two single family lots, not less than 609m2, with access off of Cliff Avenue. The existing structures will be required to be demolished prior to final reading. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is located in west Maple Ridge, just outside of the Town Centre Area Plan and is currently designated Urban Residential. For the proposed development no OCP amendment will be required to allow the proposed RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) zoning. Page 2 of 5 On December 12, 2017 Council amended the City-wide Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program policy, which permits amenity contributions for residential development throughout Maple ridge, including the provision of affordable and special needs housing in a financially sustainable manner. Each CAC will be based on a contribution rate of $5,100 per single family lot created. For single family residential subdivisions proposing fewer than 3 lots, only the original is exempt, after which the CAC program applies to additional lots. A voluntary contribution is anticipated to be requested for the amount of $5,100.00. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 22090 Cliff Avenue from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) to permit future subdivision in to two lots. The minimum lot size for the proposed zone is 557m2, and the proposed lots are approximately 609 and 722m2 in area. The Zoning Bylaw requires that no lot shall be created by subdivision without specified building envelopes. For the proposed RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) zone, a building area should have dimensions of no less than 12.0 by 12.0 metres. The subject property's shape does not allow for such building areas, therefore a Development Variance Permit requirement is anticipated. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the OCP, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for: • All areas designated Conservation on Schedule "B" or all areas within 50 metres of an area designated Conservation on Schedule "B", or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver Valley Area Plan; • All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 %; • All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural Features Schedule "C" to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions. Advisory Design Panel: No review by the Advisory Design Panel is required prior to second reading. Development Information Meeting: In accordance with Council Policy 6.20 a Development Information Meeting is not required for this application. Page 3 of 5 e) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Parks Department; f) School District; g) Utility companies; h) Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; and i) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); 2. A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); 3. A Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G); and 4. A Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. It is recommended that Council not require any further additional OCP consultation. Page 4 of 5 11849 ;;; 0, /;; 21937 934 1938 942 g C, "' C, "' ~ "' 2017 ~230-VP 1-XJV1 2017 ~230-RZ "' ~ ~ 8 "' "' C, "' ~ "' C, 8 "' "' .,, 8 "' "' CLIFF AVE. ~ C, "' C, ~ 8 ~ ~ "' "' SELKIRK AVE. C, <o ~ co .; .,, gi C, C, ~ ~ "' "' "' "' 11851 ~ K'::>0t;>r:>0J<J•IDCX>C<><J1 ~ 11783 11763 " .,, C, "' "' <o C, .; :g "' "' "' "' CLIFF PL. N Scale: 1 :2,500 Legend Stream ---Ditch Centreline Indefinite Creek ~ Active Applications (RZ/SD/DPNP) ~ ~ 11850 co ~ "' "' 11758 "' ~ "' "' ~ "' ~ ~ ~ APPENDIX A <o !;:? "' "' 11841 .,, ~ "' "' LOUGHEED HWY. <o "' .. ~ ~ ~ ~ "' "' "' "' " " .,, ~ ~ ~ "' ~ ~ "' CLIFF AVE .. co ~ ~ ~ ~ "' "' ~ ~ "' ~ "' \ "' ~ "' "' 2018-118-V~ 1)\/\;(_/\AXA-t 2018-11 S~DP. 22090 CLIFF AVENUE PIO: 011-428-953 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1~11,1• mapleridge.ca FILE: 2019-090-RZ DATE: Mar 15, 2019 BY: PC Scale: 1 :2,500 APPENDIX B 22090 CLIFF AVENUE PIO: 011-428-953 BY: PC CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7559-2019 APPENDIXC A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7559-2019." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 46 Except: Part subdivided by Plan 3707 4; District Lot 397 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 9218 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1800 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of READ a second time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of ,20 ,20 ,20 ,20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of ,20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 136 137 138 139 11814 LOUGHEED HWY. "' i <o "' C 1; "' .. .. <o <o <o 11783 :\l "-"' g "' 8 ;,,; :!l <o " ;:; 0, ~ 0 0 0 "' g: ~ "' ~ ~ ~ ~ "' "' ~ 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 P86 4 P86 4 21955 P6 365 11763 247 248 ml P92 8 pg 18 25g 27 28 29 30 31 32 ~I ill a.I; "' "' "' "' "-l ~ 0 l:l 8 ;,,; :!l "' "' ~ ~ ~ ~ "' "' CLIFF AVE. 21937 <i'j159 ~ 158 ~ "' 0 0 l:l gJ ~ 73 74 P 0365 "' 8 ~ 75 50 CLIFF PL. <o 0 i :\l <o 0, ;:; ;:; "' P4 164 165 166 167 168 ------....,:":i,,,,,, ---s~s ---...... LMP5554 LMS690 P3777 RP 5159 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING 7559-2019 1800 "' ~ ~ g: g: 10 11758 35 ~~ g: Bylaw No. Map No. From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) <o "' g: 9 8 36 37 "-::a g: LOUGHEED HWY. <o <o .., ~ .. ~ g: g: g: 7 6 P8614 P92 8 "-~ g: 38 39 "-.. g: Park P69427 "' ~ g: .. ~ g: 5 40 "' ~ ~ To: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia "' ~ g: 4 41 42 2 g: \ A -<> P68759 \ EP816~ ~ *LMP 022j:S' 00 43 ; g: a: *PP072 ~ 45 P9218 00 "' "'"' 00 O a. "' a. a. LU ;e _J 6 N SCALE 1:2,500 t--APPENDIX D SKETCH PLAN FOR PROPOSED 2 LOT SUBDIVISION OF REM Civic Address: 22090 Cliff A venue, Maple Ridge, BC PID: 011-428-953 o-16.10 RS-1b Zoning 47 NOTE: Cliff A venue Proposed Lot 1 New Area =722.0 m2 Sketch plan dimensions are metric and are based on Plan 37074. A legal survey is required to confirm new dimensions and areas. Scale: 1: 250 Paper Size: 14" x 8.5" Date: May 27, 2019 FHe: MR18-266skSUB_2rev Land Surveying Ltd 22371 St. Anne Avenue, Maple Ridge, BC Phone: 604-463-2509 Fax: 604-463-4501 I ,; New Area \ ~ I =609.6 m2 1 ~~ 82'3!!' 84 Park Client: , , , True Light Buildmg & Dev. Legal Description: Lot 46 Except: Part Subdivided By Plan 37074; DL 397 Gp. 1 NWD Plan 9218 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019 12791232 Street MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: EXECUTIVE SUM MARY: July 2, 2019 2019-119-RZ cow An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to CS-1 (Service Commercial). The subject property was excluded from the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) in 2018, but it is still designated Agricultural and is outside of Maple Ridge's Urban Containment Boundary and Metro Vancouver's Urban Containment Boundary. An application is required to Metro Vancouver to include the property within the Metro Vancouver Urban Containment Boundary and to be included in the Fraser Sewerage Area. The property is within the Yennadon Study Area which has been identified in the Commercial and Industrial Strategy as future potential employment lands. Council recently endorsed proceeding with a Land Use Re-Designation study and consultation process. This is a commercial development, therefore the Community Amenity Contribution Program does not apply. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. In respect of Section 4 75 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; 2. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019 be given first reading; and 3. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C, and D of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1106 Page 1 of 6 I DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Project Description: K. Atwall Lot 44, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 30199 Agricultural Commercial RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) CS-1 (Service Commercial) Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Estate Suburban Residential Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Agricultural Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Agricultural Single Family Residential and Farm RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Agricultural Vacant Commercial 0.4 ha (1 acre) 128 Avenue Urban Standard The subject property, located at 12791 232 Street, is located at the south-west corner of 232 Street and 128 Avenue. The property is flat and vacant, with several trees located along the western and southern property lines (see Appendices A and B). The applicant is proposing to rezone the property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to CS-1 (Service Commercial) (see Appendix C) to allow for a 2,090m2 (22,500ft2) two-storey commercial development (see Appendix D). At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will Page 2 of 6 L need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and further reports will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. c) PlanningAnalysis: Official Community Plan: The subject property is designated Agricultural and is outside of the Urban Area Boundary. The subject property was excluded from the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) in 2018, as it was less than 2 acres in size and considered too small to support an agricultural operation on its own, and exclusion would not negatively impact the agricultural viability of the adjacent ALR property to the west. For the proposed development, an OCP amendment will be required to re-designate the property to Commercial to allow the proposed CS-1 (Service Commercial) zoning. This property is one of 13 properties at the south-west corner of 128 Avenue and 232 Street referred to as the Yennadon Lands, a 25.4 ha (63 acre) site identified in the Commercial and Industrial Strategy for future employment land uses. The City's Commercial and Industrial Strategy identifies the need for an additional 63 -93 ha (170 -230 acres) of industrial lands by 2040 to meet long-term employment demand. The Yennadon Lands are one of several sites that Council has directed additional review on to explore employment land opportunities. Albion Flats is another concurrent site identified for employment uses. Additionally, in 2017, new industrial land was created at 256 Street and 130 Avenue, east of the Albion Industrial Area, and on either side of the Kwantlen IR #5 lands along Lougheed Highway. Through the implementation of the Commercial and Industrial Strategy, Council received a report on April 16, 2019 outlining a public consultation process for the re-designation of the Yennadon Lands for employment uses. Council passed the following resolution: That the April 16, 2019 Council Workshop report titled "Employment Land Use Suitability Assessment: Yennadon Lands" be referred back to staff for further work". Accordingly, staff met with the Yennadon Lands property owners on June 6, 2019 and summarized the meeting outcomes for Council at a Workshop meeting held on June 18, 2019. Eleven of the 13 properties were represented at this meeting. They discussed trends in the employment sector and how the traditional business parks are evolving to innovation districts including educational, cultural and recreational facilities. The property owners had questions around the timing, process and criteria for future land use decisions, and what the alternative to an area study would look like. There was general support to pursue an area planning process, as the property owners are hoping to gain clarity on their future land use. At this Workshop meeting, Council passed the following resolutions: That staff be directed to undertake an employment land use re-designation process and consultation strategy for the Yennadon Lands, located generally at 128th Avenue and 232nd Street; That new applications, or those already in-stream (unless reached third reading), be deferred until any potential OCP amendments are presented at Public Hearing and given third reading, with the exception of applications that propose future employment land uses; Page 3 of 6 The proposed CS-1 (Service Commercial) zone permits a range of commercial uses, as well as employment uses such as light industrial and research and non-medical testing laboratories. As a result, consideration of first reading is recommended to reflect Council's June 18, 2019 resolution regarding in-stream applications. Regional Growth Strategy: In addition to the OCP amendment, Metro Vancouver's Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) manages growth by establishing urban containment boundaries throughout the region. The subject property is located outside of the Region's Urban Containment Boundary, and partially inside the Region's Fraser Sewerage Area, which delineates properties that are able to connect to the regional sanitary system. A resolution is required by Council to forward an application by the City to Metro Vancouver to include the property within the Region's Urban Containment Boundary and include it within the Fraser Sewerage Area. This will be the subject of a future report to Council from the Engineering Department. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to CS-1 (Service Commercial) to permit a two-storey commercial development. Under the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw, properties zoned CS-1 (Service Commercial) outside of the Urban Area Boundary may be exempted from the requirement to connect to municipal sanitary services. Should the applicant receive Metro Vancouver approvals for inclusion in the regional Urban Containment Boundary and the Fraser Sewerage Area prior to second reading, a more appropriate urban commercial zone could be explored. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.5 of the OCP, a Commercial Development Permit application is required to address the current proposal's compatibility with adjacent development, and to enhance the unique character of the community. Advisory Design Panel: A Commercial Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. Page 4 of 6 d) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Parks Department; f) School District; g) Utility companies; h) Agricultural Land Commission; and i) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing and site access requirements have not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. e) Early and Ongoing Consultation: In respect of Section 4 75 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an OCP amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. f) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, as amended: 1. An OCP Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); and 3. A Commercial Area Development Permit Application (Schedule D); The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. g) Alternatives: The subject property is located in the Yennadon Lands study area, which Council directed staff to undertake a land use re-designation planning process for on June 18, 2019. Through this planning process, new land uses and zones may be created to reflect emerging employment trends and opportunities. As an alternative to the staff recommendation, Council could defer the subject application until a land use concept plan for the Yennadon Lands is endorsed. Page 5 of 6 .... N Scale: 1 :2,500 ~ 12888 .... M N /' I 12885 12865 12831 12761 I 12759 • ( .... I ""--{ \ .... \ \ ... _ '-----~--Legend Street Name Labels -Stream ---Ditch Centreline -Lake or Reservoir I .... (/) N M APPENDIX A -I 12912 "'., -~ .. VIN CRES 0,"' -., ~~ 12892 12854 12834 12814 --...... -· -------~-----_,..... _ _._ _________ _ I / I I I I I I 12784 1r----------L__J I i r1_21_6o ______________ __J I I I 12734 t------------J N 12724 12686 i 12662 12791 232 St PIO 003-269-477 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FILE: 2019-119-RZ DATE: Apr 4, 2019 BY: MC Scale: 1 :2,500 APPENDIX 8 12791 232 St PIO 003-269-477 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ~ ---~""'----··· FILE: 2019-119-RZ DATE: Apr 4, 2019 mapleridge.ca BY: MC I l CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7558-2019 APPENDIXC A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 44 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 30199 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1799 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to CS-1 (Service Commercial). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of READ a second time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER , 20 ,20 , 20 ,20 ,20 CORPORATE OFFICER P7 55 2 ~ 0 sl C D ~ i'l sl 7 P5467 6 P5467 43 co co 0.. P7 ~ "' N 41 RP 8148 2 128 AVE. A 12885 12865 P75541 3 12831 P33395 35 <o sl 12815 LMP 29188 / " "' sl 44 P301 9 12791 12761 12759 ~~ 12892 12854 10 12834 <') cc r--"' N Rem. 9 ()._ :a -' 12814 "' ~ N "' ()._ 0 a, 12784 "' "' "' 0 "' ()._ 0 a, 12760 ,-: "' <Xl (/) r--N "' M ()._ N 0 a, 12734 <!) "' N "' ()._ 0 a, 12724 ,-: oo 12686 ~ MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia 7558-2019 1799 RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) CS-1 (Service Commercial) P19 47 8 ~ ~ sl P58062 25 7 ~ "' N sl Rem2 P5181 Rem1 P4367 RemN 1/2A P4367 Rems 112A 6 ~ " sl P1934 5 4 ~ <o N sl a, ~ N sl ~ sl (\/ b 0 ...... ~ ;!; sl P51 1 L!J 6 N SCALE 1 :2,500 \ \ \ \ •i•""""""'"O...,.., '""'41~1GUU1'0l> Ii lJ Ir Ii~ I I APPENDIX D -.c...-_~ ...... ·=--mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7407-2017; 11917 and 11903 Burnett Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: July 2, 2019 2017-489-RZ cow An application has been received to rezone the subject properties, located at 11917 and 11903 Burnett Street, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential), to permit the future construction of 54 residential apartment units. (Appendix A) Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7 407-2017 on January 16, 2018. The applicant is also proposing variances to increase the storeys of the building from, 4 to 5 storeys and increase the maximum height of the building from 15 metres in height to 17 .59 metres to the top of main roof parapet. In addition, the applicant is seeking variances for parking. (Appendix C) The subject property is designated as Low-Rise Apartment in the Official Community Plan (OCP), and no OCP amendment is required to accommodate the proposed development. (Appendix B) The subject proper is located within the Town Centre Area Plan boundaries and pursuant to Council policy, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution Program at a rate of ($3,100.00 per apartment dwelling unit for an estimated amount of $167,400. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7407-2017 as amended in the staff report dated July 2, 2019 be given second reading, and forwarded to Public Hearing; 2) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii) Road dedication on Burnett Street as required; iii) Consolidation of the subject properties; iv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject properties for the proposed development; 1107 Page 1 of 7 l. v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the Visitor Parking; Tree Protection, Stormwater Management; vi) Removal of existing buildings; vii) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject properties. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; and viii) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $167,000 ($3,100 units) be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. DISCUSSION: 1) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Krahn Engineering Ltd, Wayne Venebles Lot 6 and 7, Section 17, Township 12, NWP22046 Low-Rise Apartment No change RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Apartments RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Low-Rise Apartment Apartments RM-2 Low-Rise Apartment Single-family residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Apartments and vacant RM-2 and RM-6 (Regional Town Centre High Density Apartment Residential) Low-Rise Apartment, and Medium and High-Rise Apartment Single-family residential Apartments 0.267 ha (0.661 acres) Burnett Street Urban Standard Page 2 of 7 2) Project Description: The applicant has applied to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential). The proposed development will consist of approxinatley 54 residential units with a density of 1.61 FSR with the front of the building facing onto Burnett Street. The parking will be accommodated in an underground parkade. (Appendix D) The proposal is subject to the Maple Ridge Town Centre Development Permit Guidelines. Details of the design will be proceed in a report to Council at the Development Permit Stage. 3) Planning Analysis: i) Official Community Plan: The development site is located within the Downtown East Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan. The Downtown East Precinct serves as the eastern interface and gateway to the Town Centre. More urban and pedestrian oriented development is desired in the Downtown East Precinct, which can include medium to high density residential high-rise towers. This project, a mid-rise residential building, conforms with the intent of the precinct guidelines of the Town Centre Area Plan. The Low-Rise Apartment designation is intended for development in a three (3) to five (5) storey apartment form where units are accessed from an internal corridor and residential parking is provided underground. The proposed development parking will be located within an underground parkade. (see Appendix B) The development site is currently designated Low-Rise Apartment and an OCP amendment is not required to support the development and rezoning. The following Town Centre Area Plan policies apply to this proposal: 3-1 An increase in residential and commercial density is encouraged in the Town Centre, particularly within the Central Business District... Land-use should include a mix of housing types catering to various demographics, including affordable and special needs housing, within walking distance to a broad mixture of uses, including shops, services, cultural facilities, and recreation. This project will increase the number of condominium units within walking distance to a range of shops, services, and transit in and around the Central Business District. 3-12 High density development that is four or more storeys in height may be required to include a shadow study in consideration of adjacent sites to address potential impacts on available daylight. Consideration should also be given to the privacy of residents in existing buildings. This project will be five storeys in height, but situated among four storey low rise apartments to its north, west and south and a row of single family homes across Burnett Street to its east. Bases on policy 3-12 above the applicant will be asked to provide a shadow study at the development permit review stage. Page 3 of 7 3-15 Concealed parking structures are encouraged in all commercial, mixed-use, multi-family uses... in the Town Centre. Below grade parking structures are particularly encouraged for Low-Rise, Medium, and High-Rise Apartment...buildings. This project includes an underground parking garage in compliance with this policy. 3-22 All Low-Rise Apartment developments should be a minimum of three (3) storeys and a maximum of five (5) storeys in height. This project complies with the height range envisioned by the policy. In addition to these policies, a range of environmentally sustainable policies in the Town Centre Area Plan would also apply to this application: 2-5 Incorporating Rainwater Management practices into on-site and off-site development will be encouraged[ ... ]. Some examples of Rainwater Management practices include: • bioretention areas; • rainwater gardens; • bioswales; • landscaped curb bulges on street right-of-ways; • rainwater harvest for irrigation; and • green roofs. 2-9 The use of plant and tree species that are suited for Maple Ridge climate and that will attract local songbirds and pollinating insects species [ ... ] will be encouraged in public and private development; 2-10 Landscaping, as described in policy 2-9 above, will be encouraged in all public and private outdoor spaces in the Town Centre. For areas with a large amount of paved surfaces, such as surface parking lots and public plazas, the installation of trees, rain gardens, raised planters, and/or living green walls, where feasible, is encouraged to provide some areas of refuge for wildlife, such as small birds, rainwater interception, cooling in summer months, reduced glare from pavement, carbon sequestration, and a more attractive urban environment. The applicant will be required to provide some of these measures as part of the development. In summary, this project increases the residential density within the Downtown East Precinct, and provides for more one and two bedroom condominium units in close proximity to the shops and services of the Central Business District. The project's five storey buildings conform with the intent of the OCP's Low-Rise Apartment designation, and would be similar in scale to existing apartment buildings to its north, south and west. ii) Zoning Bylaw: The zoning application for RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zoning would permit the proposed 54 units 5 storey apartment building with underground parking. (Appendix E and F) Page 4 of 7 iii) Off-Street Parking And Loading Bylaw: The subject properties are located within the Central Business District area of the Parking Bylaw therefore the number of parking stalls required are of a reduced number than other parts of the City. Town Centre Parking Standards Required Proposed Central Business District One Bedroom = 1 parking space per unit 36 units X 1 Space = 36 55 Each additional bedroom= 0.1 parking space per unit 18 units X 1.1 Spaces = 20 Plus one small car Total Required parking spaces 56 56 Visitor Spaces = 0.10 space per unit where on-street 54 units X 0.10 space = 6 5 supply available Disabled Space 1 1 Bicycle Parking Requirements Long-Term Parking 1 per 4 units 54 units/ 4 X 1 Space= 14 spaces 22 Short-Term Parking 6 per 20 units 54 units/20 X 6 Spaces= 17 spaces 17 As indicated in the chart above the project is deficient in parking for visitors by one space; therefore a variance is required to the Off-Street Parking Bylaw 4350 -1990. iv) Proposed Variances: A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project to request the following relaxations to Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 and Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990: Detail Required Proposed Maximum building height 15 m 17.59 Maximum Storeys 4 5 Front (East) Deck Wall 7.5 m 6.0 m Rear (West) Building Wall Face 7.5 m 6.68m Deck Wall 7.5 m 5.3 m Side (North) Deck Wall 7.5 m 5.8m Parking Visitor 6 Spaces 5 Spaces The requested variances to the RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone and the parking bylaw will be the subject of a future Council report. Page 5 of 7 I- v) Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.11 of the OCP, a Town Centre Development Permit application is required for all multi-family residential, flexible mixed use and commercial development located in the Town Centre. vi) Advisorv Design Panel: The Advisory Design Panel (ADP) reviewed the application at a meeting held on January 16, 2019 and their comments and the applicants responses can be seen in Appendix G. The ADP concerns have been addressed and are reflected in the current plans. A detailed description of how these items were incorporated into the final design will be included in a future development permit report to Council. vii) Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was held at Maple Ridge Secondary School at 21911-122 Avenue on February 28, 2019. Five people attended the meeting. A summary of the main comments and discussions with the attendees was provided by the applicant and include the following main points: • HUB would like a multi-use pathway. • Parking along the street is a concern. 4) Interdepartmental Implications: i) Engineering Department: The applicant's civil engineer is working with the Engineering Department with respect to the capacity and condition of the existing sanitary and sewer fronting the subject property. Any upgrades to these systems will be at the applicant's expense. There will upgrades to the curb, gutter, sidewalks and widening of the road. There is road dedication required along Burnett Street. ii) Fire Department: The applicant will have to address all Fire requirements at the time of building permit application. Page 6 of 7 -12032 12028 /30 :S' I I APPENDIX A 12026 OEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD >---1-------------r-----11969 11963 11953 119AVE. LANE Legend ---Ditch Centreline -,,.t-------,-------~ "'"'a:; ~ ~ 11954 -"1960 FULLER AVE. 11940 )l )l }' " }' I • 11930 11931 11935 I 11932 11920 11921 11922 11917 11900 11910 11911 11912 11903 11902 11900 11901 11898 11890 11891 11887 11888 11880 11881 11830 11878 11868 11869 11851 11868 11856 11857 11858 11843 11844 11845 11848 11821 11836 11837 11838 11824 11825 11826 11818 11816 11817 11810 11808 11809 11797 11798 ry,;tx~xxxx 11790 11791 2017-035-VP......_ 1 2017-035-DPi29!7.;Q~5_;RZ' 201 s:093:.Rz 11788 11903 Burnett St PIO 009-150-587 PLANNING DEPARTMENT N ~ Active Applications (RZ/SD/DPNP) Scale: 1 :2,500 FILE: 2017-489-RZ DATE: Jun 20, 2019 DEWDNEYTI 11931 11921 11911 11901 11891 11881 11871 11861 11851 \ 11841 11831 11821 11811 11801 11791 11781 BY: MC ti w w (!) l N Scale: 1 :2,000 Legend --Stream Indefinite Creek -River -Major Rivers & Lakes APPENDIX 8 11903 & 11917 Burnett St 2017-489-SD DATE: Oct 26, 2017 BY:JV CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7407-2017 APPENDIX C A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7407-2017." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 6 Section 17 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 22046 Lot 7 Section 17 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 22046 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 17 40 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 16th day of January, 2018 READ a second time the PUBLIC HEARING held the READ a third time the ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER day of day of day of ,20 ,20 ,20 , 20 CORPORATE OFFICER UNK ROAD 0 ~ f:: 57 P 46839 11969 i 8 (X) LMP 13759 a.. 7 11963 LMP \3758 11953 I LMP :!§4~ / / I I II II~ E/EASE.) 11~ ENT) IW -/ 2 11907 "B" (P 21553) LMP 46902 LMP 46901 LP 59674 LMP 26960 LMP 18896 LMP 18897 LP 76344 LMP 25642 (LEASE) LMP 34065 (LEASE) *PP089 (J) 0:, N (') 0.. w 48 11954 N 49 ~-Ml a.. ID ID a.. 11940 ~ 11920 A P 77489 "' 1 gJ (X) 0 ID 00 N o,--o:-2 2 ...J ...J P 86981 11900 236 P 61527 NWS 1739 LMP42856 <O <O "' "' "' /RW15258 r· N N a.. BCS 4014 A 11935 6 11917 7 11903 (EPS 1316) 11887 r I BCP 50772 1--1-18_3_0 ____ ____.L BCP 50773 214 P 58813 11 P 22046 11851 167 P 43930 11843 11821 "A" LMP 11048 LMP 49848 Rem 1 ti >-t, z (l'. :, m (J) .... (0 (J) .... MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING 7407-2017 1740 BCP 22904 BCP 30861 P 84291 DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD RW 80199 .,. 0 "' 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C') j:::: .,. .... 0, co f:: (!) P 68237 0.. ID w a.. Rem. 220 Pel 1 P 8011 229 230 231 P 57 91 223 224 co (!) ID a.. 218 158 157 156 153 152 151 1960 LMP 2449 LMP 2409 FULLER AVE. Rem 66 11940 65 11930 64 11920 63 11910 62 11900 (J) (J) 70 11931 71 11921 72 11911 73 11901 61~ sr74 11890 a, ~ 11891 600.. a.. 75 11880 59 11868 58 11856 57 11844 56 11836 55 11824 54 11816 53 11808 11881 76 11869 77 11857 78 11845 79 11837 80 11825 81 11817 82 11809 "' 102~ "' 101 11932 100 11922 99 11912 (J) co "' 109 ~ "' 110 11931 111 11921 112 11911 98 i oo 11902 ° [;; 1171901 a.. a.. 97 114 11898 11891 96 115 11888 11881 95 11878 94 11868 Rem.93 11858 P 44489 11848 A 91 11838 90 11826 89 11818 11810 88 (J) 87 st 116 11871 117 11861 (X) 118 11851 119 11841 120 11831 121 11821 122 11811 123 11801 00 124 ti 150 149 11950 148 11940 11930 ~ 147 r--"' 11920 0.. 146 11910 145 11900 144 11890 143 11880 142 11870 141 ti] f-11-8-60----n CJ 140 11850 139 11840 '° 138 ~ "' 137 a.. 11830 136 11820 135 11810 134 11800 133 Bylaw No. Map No. From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) 6 MAPLE RIDGE N British Columbia SCALE 1 :2,500 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CONDO ' ' ' ,-" ' ' ' ~I[ CONCRHlcPAVERS(TYP i (SEELANOSCAPlcDRAWINGSi APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DRIVEWAY ' ~~~~i~:is1 ' I I ' ' rn ~~ra!~n •" ,, d ""' ,, ,.,,,,,, .-.·.w,,~'"" '':' ,.: .•. '.~'.' :', :: ~'t.":·, t.}.~ ;,:,. .. :~ ,~PROPOSEOPROPERTYUNE 0-'SJ----r,,;n ~E.xlSTINGPROPERTYLINlc .----..---,----,. .... --------------------------------,._-..---,----~_Jc__~ I ~ ~ ! : ,, : I CIVIC ADDRESS ,1i03&1'9'7BURNEnSTREET,MAPLE R1DGE,BC "I L ~! :Ii i..t:. !:' ti! RAMP DOWN ;i ~ .. ::. -· ~.. I : ~"' '°""' ;::.·::,,a:'~.f.~t:v:~1' """',, .,,,,,,,,,, ;I .::.: i ZONINQBYLAWANAIYSIS ~--,# •::.i_ I 1 :t0NING· -0 I' 3:: I . EXISTING RS,,.RM·2(1 HOJ BUANE TTS T l&AM·2(11Yl7BUANE TTST.I a;\ W I PROPOSED RM-2 • 0 ' • ~ j i HOH~fQP fPW>~ l:•'.:l:: ::~·::::~:""" '"'" ,., ACK---;--1 ; 1--~~: 1DENSf~g~~gRSPACER.+..~~:J9,.!.,1.80 -so.&50,1.11.IOI I PROPOS ED MAIN&:INOFLOORS 21,J06•.!.·fi,2Q2,t .• 15.01',t.111gs ,m.J r---1~1 -·,· 1' i t-'·°''"~'""""'" '.,",:'.',';::'.::'.'.' '.'.'::",,;!:"'· z,:::Ul!~::l I W OOTOOOA AMENITY SPACE 1 , I W RE OOIREO 21,,1g,.t.,20% .s,627.801.t 15231.m.) ~ ffi.'~ i-·) : A a: PROVIJEO: GRA D£ LEVEL SPACE • 957 o.t 189 un.l ~-I :j ~ 1-'°'"P'"""'' ""' -::,.:: ::;;::: I 1,'.l 1 : .:. ~ ~~:l~:~~~~::~ ""'"""':"" ::.::: ::::·:: ~"-+;;;;;=~JU.-'+--41a.~'"-1· .. · f [ 1!71,~:::g:r~:"'!=~i""'~'°rli!f.\%""'' 0 , I WSTORZ FITTING C/WCAP INSTALl.EDI . I ··~ ""'°""''°' J1j BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE ~}%~!!~: '--BUILOINQHEICiH'f MAXIMUMHEIGHTPERM1n1co PROPOSEOHEIGHT ::~~g~~s~r~~/:.NCE REOOI ' •• ~~::~~:~'.~t~~::~~~~ :·:;mp::::llFACE [VARI ~,~:OD] -~Y1:E,~~i! I### 5.3mDECKWAUIVAR IANC,.J~ao1;t't. ~O "'n >OL "'"'-"-"''"'•::tr--r"'\ >## 1.5 MPARKADE ..... ,.0 '\, ! ;::••~::,.--..~:~~IW' ~ ## 1.5m0LOGW..._LLFAC B11, ~ ~,, .. :w;, .. W}"'""",.. 'L.__,. fl ~:~~~~~~1lll~~~E ~ _.4t"~l't'"" ~"q ,,,.'l, -... :::~gi~~~tt../lt,CE O . ~ o:)"I .,,,,. '""• ,s.,e.SMOC • l.·1 • ~ • '(t\ • :: , .. :'f: ~·\. •sTOREYS ,15m (J: • ~ ? .. (j : ~l~!~rs • OF 00:A : -I : REV.SHAFJ"tOPOf'l!J;°FPAliri.PH • ;J (20 2gmJ VAA:ER IRE D !. : E (13500 ,.t.12a1:!9 ,.t.t x100 -~ ~ t : • : ,,. A• • • l·'·l: 5.LOTCOVERAGE PROPOSED WT COVE.RAGE ' RESIDE~ REQUIRE D VISITOR RE QUIRED .10ru(1BED)x 1SPACEIUNIT\ .,o(:, • ••• ~ ,: .2e ru1,eED•DENl,1SPACE1U"9 .2as~~ •• ., ""' .: ·'""'•'?Rf D\11 1sP ACf"--'"~oTALAJ ~~:ACes / ••••a ~•• i,,,"\.-1 ~ "'"'"'"""'"'~'""""~"' SL lii! fa ?O ffl a57SPACE , l,'7 C ~ 1,...11 1::J .r....,,o,sPAC§lll NIT .5 .1a1s~i l) ~· .. . 5 SPACES !INCLUD ES 1 H . .: s::::~1::R:::::eoo1 ' I ~!~ .. f.i?~~r: ·~ii'f,i~~~ 7c , _J__lJ I : :..E (&2 ••ml oi>ERTY UNE .~ .. I \._UIGRAM P EXPANOEOT07Qff'I ;:,. j·. -I '. l:::::::::zU N§QF PARKAREBELOW 1 ~w z . . , \_.. : I -~ I . ' I :~','.:~,, J~~:ii;;','.,,\,J~., BICYCLEP.0..RKING LONGTERM REQU IRED PROPOSED SHORT TERM REOWREO PROPOSED 1FOREVERY•uNITS (l7INIJGB1KER00M8 50NUGWALL RACKS) _,, ·" PR OP OSED 5 STORE Y CONDOM INIU M APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTIN G CO NDO ----APPRJXIMATE LOCATION OF __};, : E~ISTING FIRE HYDRANT 1 : ~~~ BREAK DOT~~AL UNHS A(2BRI 18 BpBR.OEN) 26 ="'----" w~~Sf JO OWt:iUU~-V~MER :r.::~ENI :~rn2 C l•RR) rn7Arn• ~~~/TABlE Utm;T NU MER Al2 BR) ,ro Rl1R8•DfN) 1<M AH>S AflE.A TOTAL AREA t,026,ql!.195.3,qm l 1M66•qll.(!715.7,qm] 7M •qlt.[7\.0oqm.l 1g,El64•q".(\!45 •oq.m.] ;s•,gnl&.Jlwrnl §!§O•qtt[•F '.h oml 1,!1$1qll,105.3,qm.] 7G<,q11.111 .o ,q.m .) ~ UNIT AREA 1.=><1.l!.[95.Joq.mJ ~ 45,1021 q h,l41ii8.5,o.m.l )> "'C "'C IT1 z 0 >< 0 11903 & 11917 BURNETISTREET, MAPLE RIDGE, BC SI TE PLAN A1.1 THISfnlAWW ,N«.>l'f "r,-vf•RAIIH C,OUJI' ,lf ,'ANlf ANn l(JUU HQ!U ·oun lHSIHl,U l i.UWlltl,>J T>'i,..,..HIIILH (.,lff NI PROJECT COLOURS ELEVATION FINISH LEGEND [A] STONEVENEER.LEDGESTONE,STERLl'IG·C1 [ID HAAO.EF'i\NEl.,SMOOTl(IRONGRAVCOI.OOR-C2 ~ HAAO.EPA.NEL.SMOOTH.A.UlUMNli\NCOlOOR -C3 --c==i [gJ ~~t~o'Jr>~~J~°l&i~r:w".!i\rEA.THER. IHI SPA.NORELPA.NEl QJ STEEL MA.N DOOR · PA.INTED 'IRON GRAY COLOUR [QI HAAO.EPI\NEl.,SMOOTH,COBBLESTONECOI.OOR-CI [R] A.RCHITECT\JAA,!.CONCRETE [ID ~~~~6':;·PA,INTEOTOMA.TCHWAU III :r...cHll1t"1.UldtNUM1Gl.ASSRAIUNGPAINTEO NORTH ELEVATION ~ S'-li fiHm> , I I i EAST ELEVATION ~~ra!bn t .• ~. -~t•,·;.~,: '.',.'.'L:..::.t· ... ~~ ,, ;· ;,l/'· ... ·~:.1;~·.rt::.,r:: ,, "" , ........ -:f!--r='•:ke:~~~ -. :--!J"~ ;~ -t _flfllilio-~ i!E ;I; ;•;· ... :,;. ~,,,,:·:: ... ·~·:, -;:.!.~ !.,'. .. )~';',:. ·1·---""l>JI,':':',$ ·1· .• ;a;=. -.. 1· ::;~ ~ !'.. ·-1· :. S!:!'.. -11!.R~~~ ~0~1~f.~~ -~'"llii~~ .... :.~?g.;\5iji · ~ ····••· .~ '"::'~ ..... "rt .. ' -, "''at~~~·' rs · , .••• ~ .... ..::···"· C'7 .,..,,,.., "" ".. ,fl ... 'j "',<" P Oi; '•, ~ '. ... ~ . ~ ,•, ~ ·. ~· 0 .. ,_~ 0 ' f'\ ':. :,. :,· 1,;-.,,..,.: •VJ,-~ °P•,,. :fZ::-.1 :-f· . . . PROPOSED 5 STOREY CONDOMINIUM • ___ .llifll.020~ )> "'C "'C IT1 z 0 >< IT1 11903 & 11917 BURNETI STREET, MAPLE RIOGE, BC ELEVATIONS A4.1 IIIISl>AAWom,11ua,Yor"""IN(.(MU ' u co,,o,"'*-""""'"'·-'-''H0'Ul""""-'""' t.OS IHUJIL>WUl,OUlf1l•)HWt<i1 !!.NOH Nl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L----------------J ~ t; 0 I;; 0 z>-!~ oz uW ,_::e ~i ~g, ~ ::Q ~rrj ~"' cnrri ii "'o ....... ! ··~1[· ~ ~ in~ ~ a. w 0. i'. ~ ! iiili ti ..-....J APPENDIX F : ::1::1:1 City of Maple Ridge ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL APPENDIXG Excerpt of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Maple Ridge Advisory Design Panel held in the Blaney Room at Maple Ridge Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia, on Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at 4:08 pm. The staff liaison provided an overview of the five storey, 54 unit strata apartment project. The project team gave a presentation of the project application and plans. There was discussion on CPTED issues around the stepping stones and Panel members noted an interest in a potential RCMP assessment of the topic respecting safety and security. R/2019-006 It was moved and seconded The File No. 2017-489-DP be supported and the following concerns be addressed as the design develops and submitted to Planning staff for follow-up: Landscape Comments: 1. Improving the pedestrian environment, safety and privacy: • Consider improving design and functionality of amenity space on ground floor for both CPTED (in part due to dead end pedestrian path) and usability of space to improve visibility and circulation. • Confirm that surface parking stalls have adequate maneuvering space without conflicting with the ramp. • Incorporate a path to the north of ramp area. • Provide a water source and tool storage near community garden plots. • Where benches are adjacent to guardrails, ensure railing height is code compliant. • Coordinate the openings to the private patios with architecture. 2. Landscaping enhancements • Check for adequate soil depth in all planters. • Consider incorporating additional planting to wildflower seed mix area in rooftop area. • If stepping stones are required, consider replacing trees with a columnar solid hedge. Architectural Comments: 1·. Form and Character enhancement and additional details. • Reconsider proportions of stone relative to street scale. • Review and ensure all material returns on all elevations are consistent. Consider softening the entryway soffit material and improve lighting. • Review the proportions on all exterior box frames. • Be consistent in materials for patio guardrails. 2. Pedestrian environment and safety • Reconfigure the ground level visitor parking and circulation to soften the entry. • Provide a curb and elevation change between parking stalls and pedestrian walkway to better protect pedestrian at the entry; provide a curb letdown for more convenient access to the accessible stall. 3. Coordination of plans • Coordinate between architect and landscape architect disciplines and their depiction in plans ie: landscape furniture. I l_ l~IM .• mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7 420-2018; MEETING DATE: July 2, 2019 FILE NO: 2017-573-RZ MEETING: CoW 11575, 11587 223 Street and 22300 River Road (PID 011-537-141) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject properties, located at 11575 and 11587 223 Street and 22300 River Road, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District), to permit the future construction of approximately 36 apartment units. The applicant is proposing an increase in base density from 1.8 floor space ratio (FSR) to 2.2 FSR. In accordance with Council's draft density bonus regulations, the proposed additional density can be achieved through a cash contribution, currently determined at $96.88 per m2 ($9.00 per ft2). Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7 420-2018 on March 13, 2018. Pursuant to Council policy, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution Program at a rate of $3,100.00 per apartment dwelling unit for an estimated amount of $111,600.00. The cash contribution total for the additional density, from 1.8 to 2.2 FSR (742.88 m2), would be approximately $71,967.63. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7 420-2018 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii) Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; iii) Road dedication as required; iv) Purchase of 22300 River Road (PID 011-537-141) and consolidation of the subject properties; v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject properties for the proposed development; vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the Visitor Parking; vii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management; 1108 Page 1 of 9 I viii) Removal of existing buildings; ix) Notification to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Ministry of Environment for in-stream works on the site; x) Submission of a disclosure statement, prepared by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject properties. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; and xi) Provision of a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $111,600.00, which is in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. DISCUSSION: 1) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Sunnyville Project 223rd Ltd. Lot 7 Block 1 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 155; Lot 14 Block 1 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 155; Lot 15 Block 1 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 155 Low-Rise Apartment Low-Rise Apartment RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) Duplex and St. Andrew's Heritage Church RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) and H-1 (Heritage Commercial) Port Haney Heritage Adaptive Use Railway and Port Haney West Coast Express Station RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) and M-2 (General Industrial) Park Apartment CRM (Commercial/Residential) Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial & Mixed-Use Multi-Family (Townhouse) RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Low-Rise Apartment Vacant Multi-Family Residential 2,262 m2 (0.56 acres) 223 Street Urban Standard Page 2 of 9 2) Project Description: The subject properties, located at 11575 and 11587 223 Street and 22300 River Road, are located south of 116 Avenue, west of 223 Street and north of River Road. Consolidation of the subject properties will be a condition of rezoning and once combined, the three lots have a total area of 2,262 m2 (0.56 acres). All three properties are currently vacant. The development site's elevation descends from north to south towards the Fraser River; however, most of the transition occurs on slopes on the northern and southern sections of the site. The central section of the development site is relatively flat. There are trees located around the perimeter of the subject site, as well as lawn and shrubs located throughout the remainder of the subject property. There are a row of three heritage properties, listed on the 'Heritage Inventory' (Masonic Hall, St. Andrew's Heritage Church and St. Andrew's Manse), adjacent to the subject property on the north side of 116 Avenue, and the Port Haney West Coast Express Station is located across the street on the south side of River Road. The current application proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) to permit the construction of a five storey apartment building consisting of 36 units. The proposed building will consist of a concrete base and wood frame construction with a mix of one, two and three bedroom units. Residential parking will be located underground and will be accessed from 223 Street with visitor parking located in the underground parking. The main pedestrian entrance, loading area and some on-street parking is also proposed along the 223 Street frontage. Due to grade changes sloping north to south, the building will appear to be a four storey apartment from 116 Avenue and a five storey apartment from River Road. The top floor will be recessed to provide a visual break in the massing, further allowing for larger open space and patio areas for top floor units. Materials will consist of brick at the base, cement paneling and wood cladding. Extensive landscaping has been proposed on the southern portions of the development and along the retaining walls, including a public art piece and seating features at the corner of River Road and 223 Street (see Appendix F). The property located at 22300 River Road is currently owned by the City; however, the developer will purchase the City property to be included as part of the development prior to final reading. The City property is 677 m2 in size and on its own has little development potential, due to its steep slopes and the amount of dedication required to achieve current road standards. Council will be consulted on the appraisal of the City-owned property and will be required to authorize the sale. Some details of the current design are still to be determined and will be the subject of a future report to Council, through Development Permit application 2017-573-DP. 3) Planning Analysis: i) Official Community Plan: The development site is located within the Port Haney and Waterfront Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan. This precinct is an important transportation link between the Central Business District, the Fraser River Waterfront, the West Coast Express Station and east Maple Ridge via the Haney Bypass. Port Haney's historic roots, heritage character, waterfront access, green space, and river and mountain views are a treasured part of the precinct that should be enhanced through· any new development. The subject property is designated as Low-Rise Apartment, and stated in Policy 3-22: "is intended for developmet in a three (3) to five (5) storey apartment form where units are accessed from an internal corridor and residential parking is provided underground." An OCP amendment is not required to support the proposed project. Page 3 of 9 I- The following policies apply to this proposal: Town Centre Area Plan 3-1 An increase in residential and commercial density is encouraged in the Town Centre[ ... ] Land-use should include a mix of housing types catering to various demographics, including affordable and special needs housing, within walking distance to a broad mixture of uses, including shops, services, cultural facilities, and recreation. • This project increases the residential density by introducing up to thirty-six (36) units, including one, one-bedroom unit; 20 two-bedroom units and 15 three-bedroom units. The subject site is located within walking distance to a range of shops, services, the Westcoast Express and the Fraser River Waterfront. 3-11 Viewscape studies may be required for proposed buildings greater than three (3) storeys in height, where views may be impacted [ ... ] to the Fraser River to the south. Important viewscapes have been identified along 224 Street, within Port Haney, and the south slopes of the Town Centre on 116th and on 2271h. In locations where it is deemed that key viewscapes will be impacted, an increase in density, or the proposed form, may not be supported. • This project's five storey height, in addition to the development site's moderate slope and location will provide excellent views towards the Fraser River. There is little likelihood that any existing views will be blocked. 3-12 High density development that is four or more storeys in height may be required to include a shadow study in consideration of adjacent sites to address potential impacts on available daylight. • The applicant has provided a shadow study to show impacts to adjacent properties. Shadowing during the winter months has the largest impact to those surrounding properties, most notably to the north. However, given these properties are heritage properties, their likelihood of redevelopment is minimal. 2-9 The use of plant and tree species that are suited for Maple Ridge climate and that will attract local songbirds and pollinating insects species [ ... ] will be encouraged in public and private development; 2-10 Landscaping, as described in policy 2-9 above, will be encouraged in all public and private outdoor spaces in the Town Centre. For areas with a large amount of paved surfaces, such as surface parking lots and public plazas, the installation of trees, rain gardens, raised planters, and/or living green walls, where feasible, is encouraged to provide some areas of refuge for wildlife, such as small birds, rainwater interception, cooling in summer months, reduced glare from pavement, carbon sequestration, and a more attractive urban environment. • Extensive landscaping with a variety of plant and tree species is proposed around the subject property, with a strong focus along the southern portions of the site and along the new retaining walls. The applicant is proposing an accessible pedestrian feature, at the corner of River Road and 223 Street, to help reduce the impact of the retaining walls. This southern section will also provide a seating area and public art feature that is reflective of the Fraser River and complimentary to the West Coast Express station (see Appendix G). Page 4 of 9 Housing Action Plan: The City's Housing Action Plan (HAP) was endorsed by Council in 2014. It seeks to increase access to "safe, affordable, and appropriate housing that meets the diverse and changing needs of the community". The HAP also speaks of the need to provide a range of non-market, affordable and special needs housing. This was reaffirmed with the endorsement of the Housing Action Plan Implementation Framework in September, 2015. The subject application does provide a mix of unit size including one, two, and three bedroom units; however, the applicant has indicated they are not interested in providing any dedicated rental, affordable, or special needs housing. Citywide Community Amenity Program: The City-wide Community Amenity (CAC) Program approved by Council on March 14, 2016 and amended on December 14, 2017, applies to this project. A voluntary contribution of $3,100 per apartment unit, totaling $111,600, is required for this project before final reading. ii) Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) to permit the construction of a five storey apartment building. The maximum allowable density within the RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) zone has an FSR of 1.8 times the net lot area. This development is proposing an FSR of 2.2, which exceeds the maximum allowable density by 0.4 FSR or 7 42.88m2 (7,997 ft2). Based on Council's draft density bonus regulations for RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) zoned properties, additional density can be achieved in exchange for a cash contribution currently set at $96.88 per m2 ($9.00 per ft2). There is ongoing discussion regarding the density bonus contribution rates; however, the dollar value listed above ($96.88 per m2) is the most current framework and may be subject to change for future applications. Recent discussions with Council have also noted a preference for cash-in-lieu rather than the direct provision of rental units. Any density bonus contribution received are intended to help fund the creation of future affordable housing in the community. A preliminary review of the plans indicate that the proposal generally complies with the Zoning Bylaw and the Subdivision and Development Services Bylaw; however, variances will be requested, as discussed below. iii) Off-Street Parking And Loading Bylaw: The Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw requires 1.5 parking spaces plus 0.2 spaces for visitor parking per dwelling unit in the RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) zone, requiring 62 spaces in total for the proposed 36 unit development. The applicant is proposing 45 resident parking spaces and six visitor parking spaces, for a total of 51 parking spaces; therefore, a variance will be required. The applicant is also requesting a variance to increase the percentage of allowable small car spaces from 10% to 13.7%. As per Schedule "C" in the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw, the applicant may choose the 'Payment-In-Lieu' Fees for residential parking off-site. The fee for 'Payment-In-Lieu' is $8,000.00 per stall (multiplied by 11 spaces), for a total of $88,000.00. Two of the parking spaces are designated accessible parking and three spaces are designed as level 2 charging stations for electric vehicles. Some limited on-street parking will be available on all three street frontages. Page 5 of 9 iv) Proposed Variances: A preliminary review of the plans indicate that the proposal generally complies with the Zoning Bylaw, Subdivision and Development Services Bylaw and Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw; however, variances will be requested through a Variance Permit application. The following proposed relaxations are outlined below: Zoning Bylaw: • Reduce eastern property setback (223 Street) from 7.5m to 1.24m. • Increase maximum height from 15m (4 storey's) to 18.2m (5 storey's). • Increase in retaining wall height. Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: • Reduce parking requirement from 51 stalls to 40 stalls (reduction of 11 stalls). • Increase percentage of small car stalls from 10% to 13. 7%. The requested variances to the RM-2 zone (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) will be the subject of a future Council report. v) Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.11 of the OCP, a Town Centre Development Permit application is required for all multifamily residential, flexible mixed use and commercial development located in the Town Centre. Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for all developments and building permits within 50m of the top of bank of all watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. vi) Advisory Design Panel: The application was reviewed by the ADP on January 16, 2019 and their comments and the applicants responses can be seen in Appendix H. The details of the project's form and character will be outlined to Council in a future Development Permit report. vii) Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was held at Fraserview Community Hall on June 10, 2019. Six people attended the meeting. A summary of the main comments and discussions with the attendees was provided by the applicant and include the following main points: • Concern regarding noise and vibrations from the trains. • Concern from neighbours to the west regarding slope stability and impacts the proposed development may have on the existing building (west). • Comments regarding the proposed landscaping to ensure appropriate planting choices that reflect climate change. As well, comments seem very positive on the landscape area renderings and a hope that the completed project appears as illustrated. • General questions regarding building details including: electric vehicle charging stations; location of recycling and garbage access; unit size and cost; and project timing. Page 6 of 9 The following are provided in response to the issues raised by the public: • Developer will consider acoustic buffering, and suggested that they will be using soundproof construction materials to mitigate the noise. • Geotechnical report has been provided and is in support of the development. • Developer will consider using drought resistant plantings. Landscape plans were prepared by a Landscape Architect, as well, plans have been supported by the Advisory Design Panel. 4) Environmental Implications: An Environmental Assessment, Arborist Report and Geotechnical Report were provided as part of the development application. The development site's elevation descends from north to south towards the Fraser River; however, most of the transition occurs on slopes on the northern and southern sections of the site. The central section of the development site is relatively flat. Vegetation on the subject properties consist of ornamental shrubs, grasses and mature trees. A watercourse (roadside ditch) is located along the southern property boundary, north of River Road. As part of the servicing requirements, this roadside ditch will be removed and a storm sewer will be implemented. This southern-most portion of the property is currently vegetated with invasive species, including Himalayan Blackberry, which will be removed as part of development. Assessment of the roadside ditch, provided by the Environmental Consultant, concludes it is non-fish bearing. 5) Traffic Impact: As the subject properties are located within 800m of the Lougheed Highway, a referral has been sent to the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. Ministry approval of the Zone Amending Bylaw will be required as a condition of final reading. At this time, the Ministry has granted preliminary approval of the development application. 6) Interdepartmental Implications: i) Engineering Department: To fulfill requirements with the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw, the Engineering Department has requested the following: • Concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk required along 223 Street, 116 Avenue and River Road frontages. • A concrete bulb to be constructed at 223 Street and River Road intersection. • Existing roadside ditch along River Road to be eliminated and replaced with a new storm sewer connection. • 223 Street property frontage to be upgraded to a collector standard, as well as upgrades to River Road. • A parking lane to be provided along River Road up to the existing sidewalk. • Street lighting required on all property frontages and street trees required across 223 Street and 116 Avenue frontages. Page 7 of 9 • Existing watermains and service connections to be replaced; new sanitary sewer connections and capacity analysis required; new storm sewer and storm service connection required along River Road and extended up 223 Street. • Road dedication required along River Road. ii) License. Permits and Bylaws Department: The Building Department has reviewed the proposal and comments have been provided to the applicant. iii) Fire Department: The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and comments have been provided to the applicant. 7) School District No. 42 Comments: The proposed application would affect the student population for the catchment areas currently served by Maple Ridge Elementary and Maple Ridge Secondary School. Maple Ridge Elementary has an operating capacity of 480 students. Actual numbers for 2016 student enrolment at Maple Ridge Elementary was 381 students (82% utilization). Maple Ridge Secondary School has an operating capacity of 1300 students. Actual numbers for 2016 student enrolment at Maple Ridge Secondary School was 1,317 students (101% utilization). 8) Citizen/Customer Implications: A Development Information Meeting was held on June 10, 2019. The results of the concerns expressed at that meeting are discussed above in Section 3) vii). The Public Hearing will provide an additional opportunity for citizens to express their concern or support of the development. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the policies of the OCP as the RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) zone aligns with the Low Rise designation. The applicant is proposing to increase the density for this development from 1.8 to 2.2 FSR. The current density bonus contribution rate of $96.88 per m2 is proposed for the subject application; however, this dollar value may change for future applications. Page 8 of 9 2169 2173 2177 2181 185 89 N Scale: 1 :2,000 " ' ' \::] ' ' \ ~ (\J gj CALLAGHAN AVE. 116 AVE. Legend -stream ---Ditch Centreline -Edge of River - -Indefinite Creek 1111 River -Major Rivers & Lakes ~ gj lt---1'-'-1:::.,58'..!..7_. 11575 APPENDIX A ST. ANNE AVE. ~ ~ fij ~ ~ "' "' "' "' "' 11664 gj gj gj gj gj 11654 ~ '1,,~).-~~ !/f ~ 6:, ~l;o "'"' "' -1<5'<5' gj gj gj (\J"' (\J gj CALLAGHAN AVE. 11580 P.I.D. 011-537-141 ' 11575/87 223 STREET PLANNING DEPARTMENT [~1nnza mapleridge.ca FILE: 2017-573-RZ DATE: Feb 19, 2018 BY:PC 11 116 11 Scale: 1 :2,000 APPENDIX 8 P.I.D. 011-537-141, 11575/87 223 STREET C 0 'cii (/) ~lt-----------------..J PLANNING DEPARTMENT l~I.L'dia mapleridge.ca BY:PC CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7 420-2018 APPENDIXC A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7 420-2018." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 7 District Block 1 Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 155 Lot 14 District Block 1 Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 155 Lot 15 District Block 1 Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 155 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 17 43 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 13th day of March, 2018. READ a second time the PUBLIC HEARING held the READ a third time the day of day of day of ,20 ,20 ,20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this ,20 ADOPTED, the day of ,20 day of PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 224 2z'i69-22136 210 223 22173 22174 211 22182 22177 222 212 22181 213 11665/11667 BCS 2550 LMP17221 II Pel. "1" BCP 32782 (lease) II I- -_Ji ;r - -or( / <!) P 155 11683 P11527 <1,~Rem '<> 2 'O '°6'? ;:!;JI ... f---~-~-----~ a. ~~ ~ 0 c.o co ... P 155 ~ 4 5 A , ....J ill P 76188 ,, ~ ,Ii--~-~~----~ ' CALLAGHAN AVE. ~ EPP 52 1;B ~ U):;, gj :_~ ~ ~~ "' ....JN EPP 52746 ST. ANNE AVE. RP 53523 LMP 14886 Rem "' C "' "' C 1)l " "' <o CD ""' ""' ~ 11664 CD ~ "' "' "' "' 11654 CD 22 21 20 19 B a.. P1 5 RP 6192 P 82887 p 55 A ·IB 12 P16 11 13 14 2 ""'"' I~ "' "' -"'""' ,a. " "-"' ~~ w ""' p RK ~ ~ "' "'"' "' "'"' - - - --, EP 5976 CALLAGHAN AVE. Pel.A ~I r--;;;J ~I ....J 2 P 59 18 4 31 0, 2 3 0) ~ "' /::! "-"' "' "' "'"' "' /::I "'"' "' "'"' LMS 3297 116 128 11580 l{) 15 l{) f' 11587 (J) a.. 14 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia 7420-2018 1743 RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Rem 1 EPP 34022 Rern 2 . p 155 2 ~ N B SCALE 1 :2,500 :::~:::.:::_:-;-~- "" t1 '.<I>') ~·~;~~ -~::_ __ ;_l~j ~~~~~ CL) SV SITE PLAN-200 ,A..040\ SCf.l.E:1 :200 SITE PLAN LINE TYPES PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE PARKING OUT\JNE l EVEL10IJTUNE )> '1J '1J m z 0 >< 0 EB !wire/ f Arch1tecture ),O.l@~AAlll:OR!Jt,NCfllHV~ 1111~0.-VIPM~ £W/l.;,,-~t.f!C.CA o~~~ 223rd STR EET 11575 & 11587 223rd SI, MAPLE RIDGE. SC SITE PLAN REISSUED FOR SECO ND HEARING PlOIDlllE MAY, 1702019 1w.MI Asindicated 1 ,..''""ECJ A-0101 MGH 6 \1 ~~~ ['"~"~2 ~•::::-I -hi ' -1-1-1-t-,_ - I I ffi05!.7"J3~~ - --i"-11 i I. i [(9S:!_41 ~~L_----t - i 0 (,) I T i ' ' ----I I ---t--1---- 1 : j -J------i I -----;--i---- ' I : I I l __ i ___ _ ' i ---I __ j _ : i --- ---t--1---- I i ---I -i l _! ___ _ ' ~: 0 55.TT'J1U od::J....t, .. EVEL1 -·--. ·JL : -. J D~"'·="d"''"-;,;-~ ~-n-I I j :, I I I I l I · I I • ·1 i r i i [(4<,?_B1 1!.8~.!!.0JZ.._._ ~ -. g:!::~~~~~~: ~ -- -- -_a;-·-:.__ SV NORTH . ' l---·- (!)05,!71~~ _ ....... -~ _!_ -J _ . I I : 1 1 ~ '"II I ll j-'}I IIH I II l I~ It' I ''".'" l' I j 1 111 .I I J .. '·.III!. I FJ .I I I I; I I. J I .J .b I , I Q95:.!_4'129..:..DllQ.!_EVEj,5 ___ t _ -1-__ _ i I Q &S,!1]2!,_ro.Qgve.J.., ___ l __ I ___ _ i i I D"~""'-""J-"""'--i -j-- i [(65:!_21 20..:..oooJ.._~2-_ Q S5:!71 l?:_.~1 ___ ii [1~"'1 •"""'.JTI""',,,,,---:1' [(4<.78']11650J..Be,.s_l'.ll:lf_ ! [(oi, 1iiOO)"PARRTNG1PJEC == ~ 041:mri 1~"DFl"otmoni 0 SV SOUTH .t.-DUl1 SCAl.£:1:KIO ----- ----- ----- ITEM 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 00 09 10 11 12 13 " 15 " 17 MATERIAL LEGEND MATERIAL [ FINI SH I COLOUR CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE 3518X145/8 BRICK HARDI PLANK PANEL ON REVEAL 3-PIECE 1X6 FACIA WOODGRAIN METAL Cl.ADDING ALUMINIUM WINDOW MULLION DOUBLE GLAZE GLASS PANEL ALUMINIUM GUARD FRAME GUARD GLASS PANELL HEAVY TIMBER W OOD CANOPY SLOPE GLAZING HEAVY TIMBER WOOD TRELLIS STONE VENEER SPANDREL PRECAST CONCRETE LINTEL PRECAST CONCRETE COPING WOOD BRACKET ARCHITECTURAL FINISH GRAY STACK SMOOTH COBBLE STONE CHARCOAL CEDAR ANODIZED CHARCOAL CLEAR CHARCOAL TEMPERED CLEAR STAINED CLEAR STAINED CULTURED STONE SCULPTED ASHlAR GRAY ARCHITECTURAL ANISH GRAY ARCHITECTURAL FINISH GRAY STAINED )> "'C "'C rn z 0 >< rn lmirul tArch1tecture l ,O.IIJIOIW!MDftllf..amtVI.IIIXll.MR MT151<Q-"1•11'7~ O.W~H"O,ttlSPflCIWIQll'ECII.KC.O. ltU(I0,7711,!QM o~-->,1,lf"..1,_ 223rd STREET 11575 &11587223rd St,MAPLER1DGE,BC NOR TH & SOUTH ELE VATIONS REISS UED FOR SECOND HEARING PlOTIIIIIE MAY.17,2019 A-0401 6 0 I Q I I I II'"~"~-"~"""'-----i-------,-[04117 I p' - II'M~"''-~ - --- --,-- ---~~-:,. --~! I !'J' J fl:-~-c-'-A, j f :/!" jl(Jll l I ff:::±l ,j,j 1-- ----J mi i, . . a _a -1+-D!,5:.!_4129..:..~L -----I r I :I !---Pl!OPERTYU£ 0 ~>.'1'!,.""cillY<I<-- - --· ---i·---- 07S~612!.~L!_ __ -_ -1----- I !i [IG.5:!,2'J~~LL _ ----1-- --- [155,!.TJl!,.llOIIJJ.MLL _ _ __ [l5("'J 1PolQ"'F~ ---' ELEVATION EAST MATERIAL LEGEND ITEM !f!ATER lAL FINISH / COLOUR IOI ICAST-IN-PLAQE CONCRETE !ARCHITECTURAL FINISH GRAV 102 IJ 518 X14 5/8 BRICK !STACK 03 HARDI PLANK ANEL C/W REVEAL SMOOTH COBBLE STONE 04 3-PIECE 1X8 F CIA CHARCOAL los !WOODGRAIN i,,ETAL CL.ADDING ICEOAR [06 [ALUMINIUM W)NDOW MULLION I ANODIZEO CHARCOAL 07 [DOUBLE G~E GLASS PANEL )cLEAR -08 ALUMINIUM G ARD FRAME CHARCOAL 09 GUARD GLAS PANELL TEMPERED CLEAR !STAINED 11 [SLOPE GLAZltilG !CLEAR 12 lHEAVY-TIMBE~woob TRELLIS -!STAINED I--113 [STONE VENEEIR l~~~~:eo STONE SCULPTED 14 -ISPANOREL I -------fGRAY 15 PRECAST CO ' CRETE LINTEL ARCHITECTURAL FINISH GRAY 16 PRECAST CO CRETE COPING ARCHITECTURAL FINISH GRAY -117 T STAINED 'i I :1 I ,l .. ,. 0 ? 1! .I [113,Q_T]:M..:..'73QfiliQf.Y.C~--------i-------r----------- :1 ! I I I [105!_7]3;_~--il-------=. ----1-------L---------+---- -----jl 1 ---1 I .. ~""'" ______j ii 11 g I 1 [IE15:,!.412!:.,.ooclJ..bM.LL-#-_ ----·-•• --· • ,-·i ··· ···-· · · ·-· ---1-·· ...... ·-···-.. -· + ---· ....... . ,: :: I ! 0"1!'1"-""::l.w<J.'-~--1, ---~------y----- iJ s I : 546». !I I ' IJ>~1 _""::l.w<J.,_i__ ----,-----t ---- ~ I . i, • I I ·, ' I [l6S~~~L;t__.JI.__ -----~--------r---- I. D «I_!']1!_~QgP ;i . .:_:i__ _ _:.::__._ .. _ .··1 .'~ 0""'' '""ITl''"'""''.;:;;;it_ -.:cc--~ -~ ~ =::I: - [l41:ft']1D~~TftlN----, =l -it . I (2:) ELEVATION WEST ii> ,A.-0200 SCALE;1 ;1(Xl i'· 1 i ,--------i-----·----· -,------ i lnHire./ tArchrtecture l1Q.10JllWJltlf.~1/l.NOAfl1 VNl».NfJJ. MIIWUOIMll,l 'm'MC.OW.O,,. CJ.\ll~ll#~TCCllllLl:l 223rd STREET 1157S&11S87 223rdSt.MAPLER1DGE.BC WEST & EAST ELEVATIONS REISSUED FOR SE COND HEARING MAY.17,2019 1-••"· MGH A-0402 6 T STAIRACCSSS ~~f BENCHB('>!2):MAGil MODE L MLB-PCC, MA TIE BROl',\ZE RAIS EOP IPCONCRETE PLANTfR =:a:.·. 0 900mm HT, MIN. 1200mm Wl~E E ARTI FI CIA LLA1N ..- ~·.···~·.·~ 'T" ··:-:-::.0::-:;_L_ EX.TR EETO.BE ·' '_"; ) REMOVED (TYP) \-,_/' f.tECHA N1CALPENTH0USEROO FEL•32298 FlFTHFLOOREL•29000 FlRSTFLOOREL=17000 PAR KINGEL.•13:l95 .. u PLANT SCHEDULE o9. e/Il ' 00 _, ...c, ........ JUJ .. -= "'"°""""°-"'"""""-" """··=-...... ,, . .....,, ........... ........ """'"'UIAl..., .... Hoao,on ... ~Ol'"""-">WE ........... . ..........,,.HC.11<)110,~.... AOlll'IOU"'""""' .. '"' """'"'"'""""""""'"'"""""'"""...,...,.. .... O(J< ...... """'"",,.,._ ,--·--~~-"---... ffT <'.IUM O,CEA""'°"'IU\ '"""""'""""°" """'OU<S1''-"""-=·-· t""'-£TOPWO"'UA""" ""'"'""''""""""'VU" ,., ...... """'¢ """""".,,...,.. ...,.="""'°'"'"" ....... Git ·™'""'"'">'(" A\IC--C/1-.o.ou>SfflOCF AUCLJU """""''"'""''~"-"" '"""""'".._.,.,:o,,,,c= ->IGEAW.UO.WOAOAI' "'""""""""""'°·""""""' ......... .,.,.,..'JICA."-"YTU" ,..,.,,,..oow,nc,."""""" Pft~•VJ CAVll<>COIUU$'VJ!nw.•• ~-o,,.,._,,.,w, .. ... c<X<><:c>MOO<uwu.1'U$ClrOW< """'"'-'"""'"'".,_.,r T<)P l,IWT '"""'""°""''"'""""°'s n ...... OCOO<HTA<"-S"""""" CA-1'S >'-'<••<Ll <>E"5 Tf .. .. " .. """"·- "'~'"°"""'' .. """".,,,.,,. Ht'UC><<R>Oot$$1MCKWO•""'"" ..................... -~~ .....,...,,.,.,fORT,'£VEAALl)'N GOUI' cou,,..,,., .. ,. """""' ctCtO,X,U,""'1H$<"<'nU CO<O•ACT ... ,_,..,,.......US H "--""""""'"'°~ twU!OUoOl;lll0W"""""·"""""° .......... ...,,. .... u ... ,......oo •~•oon,....,.,....,.,o,., )> ""C ""C m z 0 >< "Tl CCcP\'~Qhl rese rv ed.Tolsdrawlng anddeoig n is the pmperty or PMG Landscape Arclli~cts and may not be reproducedorusedtoroiherpmjt clswi11'10u l their permls$lon. Suite C100 • 4185Stll1Cree ~ Drive 8urnaby,BritishColurnbia,V5C6G9 p:604294-0011:f.604294-0022 WATER 'S EDGE 11575 & 115 87 223 RD STREET MAPLE RIDGE, BC LANDSCAPE PLAN Ll VI ,: ~ ::c ,.:;; :;; ;;o ;!:! ~ ~ C :;: .. 0, gE "' "ti .,; I"'" ~m ~ m ;J> ~~ C z gi i r-; Q N MECHANICAL PENTHOUSE ROOF EL.= 32298 FIFTH FLOOR EL.= 29000 FIRST FLOOR EL.= 17000 PARKING El.= 13395 mnma 11111~1111111111 Rtv~R;~)/~'. "1Q ', ,, 1''ioo,,1 ""5~::::...J-_;co,._ ___ PROPER/ LINE ",(_ -... "i\{:'.!flr,, ":!' ~! n :f ~~ h i4"0 ~iii it!i : ~i eH ii~ HI ~ai m '?i SITE FURNISHINGS ·--===-----~ ~ -· -l!:a1a1 .-----.--~---~~ .. -. - WASTE RECEPTACU· BENCH B (INTERIOR SEATING AREA): CHAISE SEATING: MAGUN MLWR-400-M MAGUN MLB 1400-M MAGLINMCL720-W METAL: BRONZE MATTE FINETEX FINISH METAL: BRONZE MATTE FINETEX FINISH METAL: BRONZE MATTE FIN ETEX FIN ISH ALL FURNISHINGS TO BE SURFACE MOUNTW TO CON CRETE HOUSEl:EEPING PAD, LOCATIONS AND SIZE TO BE COORDINATED WITH ARCHITECT, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. _:::_· ··;n n ,, 1 ,;Ji~ . ,,fl i~~ ·-;-_l,v: .,_;,)·: l ~ ..... AtuMINUMPLANTERS PL.ANTERSPERFECT(ORSIMILAR) METAL: BRONZE MUTE FIN ISH D1VIOERSERIES,60"L PROPOSED TREE S AMELANCHl£R ACER PALMA TUM 'BLOODGOOD' RHUS TYPHINA 'TIGER EVES' ! -!-·" ,.,.~~~r -( · ... ~~ 1:.: ,. /:~., ,. ~ ~..,_.;;:·t . _"·;·..;;.'. ~'i)I: .• ~. . .9 -,._,._ ALUMINUM PLANTERS ART INSTA LLATION: PLANTERS PERFECT (OR SIM ILAR) STEEL SCULPTURE EMBEDDED IN PLANTERS M ETAL: BRONZE MATTE FINISH SPUNSERIES,S1ZELARGE33"0IA ( ";_#. :'-' ~'·'. --i ~ ~f~[ · 1 :S'-~:..~1 5 ; ;..:.,.···· ... ~ ..... 1 PATHWAY LIGHT BOLLARD HEVI UTE#6003-BZ-12 (12"LENGTH) (OR APPROVED SIMILAR) METAL: BRONZE MATTE FINISH INGROUND Pl.ANTER CONCRETE MOUNT• (TO BE COORDINATED WITH ARCHITECTURAL & ELECTRICAL CONSULTANTS) PICEA GLAU CA 'PENDULA' CHAMAEC't'PARIS NOOR VAN DEN Al<k'.ER' LIQUIDAMBER S. 'SLENDER SILHOUETIE' ACER GRISEUM ACER PALMA TUM 'SEIRYU' STY RAX JAPONICA ACER PALMATUM 'SHIN OESHOJO' CR:1 BIKE RACK: MAGLINSCBR-1600 METAL: BRONZE MATTE FINETEX FINISH ~1;;7~ ~-~~-~-~: Cl , . ...-- ~.!".!! ...... .. ----·-_1A , STEP LIGHT WAC LIGHTING WL-LOBD (OR APPROVED SIMILAR} METAL: BRONZE MA TIE FINISH {TO BE COORDINATED WITH ARCHITECTURAL & ELECTRICAL CONSULTANTS) PICEAOMORIKA PAV ING KEY ~ I ~ [] . . . DECORATIVE PAVING LE VEL ONE: HYDRAPRESSED CONCRETE SLAB PAVERS, EG. ABBOTSFORD NEW YORK SERIES FULL ANO HALF SIZES DECORATIVE PAVING AT EN TRY: PORCELAIN SLAB PAVERS TO MATCH LOBBY {SIZE, PATTERN, COLOUR TBD), MORTARED IN PLACE DECORATIVE PAVING LEVEL ONE: HYDRAPRESSED CO NCRETE SLAB PAVERS,EG . ABBOTS FORD NEW YORK SERIES FULL SIZE B.F. CONCRETE SEE ARCH . FOR FINISH DETAILS TREX 'ENHANCE' COLOUR TBD I COM POSITE DECKING: NOTE: INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AN D ALIGNED AS SHOWN . CCo1>Yrlgh1,nerv...:I.Th l•dlllWln11 ~nddesTgn "the J>R)perty of PMG Umdsc.upe Ardlite<:1$ and may not be ,e~orundfo101herprojec1Swilhoutllleo' ~-.. Suhe c ,oo . ~,ass1111CreekOrlve Bum;1by,Bri1i5hColumbla,V5C 6G9 p: 60429+001 1 : I: 604 29-4-0022 WATER'S EDGE 11575 & 11587 223RD STREET MAP LE RIDGE, BC LAN DSCAP E DE TAILS L3 OF3 PMGPROJECTNU~BER 18-049 /mire//" t-Arch1tecture JID-!CJIDVAAt,'liDAl".iamtV.w::aM.11 8'RIT6>1~117P1V7 ~ D'M:N'oCtlSPRlWIClflU:llR.C& lll.tllf-7711-lCII o~--Al,t,,I•- 223rd STREET 11S7S & 11587 223rd Sl, MAPLE RIDGE, BC 30 RENDERI NGS )> RE ISSUED FOR SECOND "'C HEARING "'C ~~------m THO. l'lOl!IATt MAY.17.2019 Ol'W<>I MGH z -_,,.,., c::, ,~ A-0005 ~6 >< Ci) JttHve/. oArchrtecture 31G-1<001MRNE D0~t.~vmro.,.u a;ms"a.O\.OINA VT>!VI~ OMl ~IFoCflS>RD>.'lCHlrtG'TIR.CA ·-- c~,.o,,,1 -...:u. . .. ...,.. ......... 223 rd STREET 11575& 11587 223rd SI, MAPLE RIDGE. BC 3D RENDER INGS RE ISSU ED FOR SECOND HEAR ING MAY.17.20191 -MGH A-0006 I 6 lttHiret/ t-Arch1tecture lll),lO))WICMDRlif,N(;j!T)IV~ 1111~o..o,,,a,V1P1V1(:H<Al)I,, twa.,l',f~~ltt!Ul'l'..t.1 APPENDIX t\ Advisory Design Panel Comments: The Advisory Design Panel (ADP) reviewed the form and character of the proposed development and the landscaping plans at a meeting held on January 16, 2019. After presentations by the project Architect and Landscape Architect, the ADP made the following resolution: That the following concerns be addressed regarding File No. 2017-573-DP and digital versions of revised drawings & memo be submitted to Planning staff; and further that Planning staff forward this on to the Advisory Design Panel for comment: General Comments: Greater attention is needed from both the landscaping and architectural perspective in achieving the OCP Key Guideline Concepts of the Port Haney and Waterfront Area, for this high profile and iconic Port Haney site, adjacent to the historical village, the Fraser River and commuter transportation. Landscape Comments: Pedestrian environment, urban design and safety enhancements: • Redesign the corner and River Road frontage to create a stepped accessible pedestrian feature that reduces the impact of the stepped retaining wall and allows for introduction of public art and seating complementary to the public area of the West Coast Express station. • Explore a relaxation in the wall heights/planters restriction facing River Road to allow for at grade programming including lighting, public art, and seating; higher retaining walls in location may be supportable as a means of improving the pedestrian environment and CPTED concerns. • A CPTED report would be desirable to ensure corner is suitably designed. • Add locking gate at bottom of walkway and provide lighting, possibly motion sensor activated. • Provide a curb bump out at the right-in to the parkade entry. • Check width of sidewalk to eliminate pinch points. Enhancing pedestrian environment, amenities and capitalize on views: • Consider incorporating the one bedroom unit north of the interior amenity space into an outdoor amenity space and including programming for all age use. • Design and program the roof top area. • Provide a gate to the patio of the 2 bedroom unit on the West side. Integrate the landscape design with stormwater management strategy consistent with the escarpment policy. Architectural Comments: River Road Street front and corner significance: • Given the strategic location of this site, incorporate suitable elements for public art or similar features that help to achieve the Key Guideline Concepts of the Port Haney and Waterfront precinct. • Place a public art piece fronting River Road that connects the location with the Fraser River, and history of the Port Haney area. Form and Character enhancement and additional details: • Be consistent in accent colours in all elevations. • Provide more prominent building corner designs. • Redesign blank walls at corners. • Provide updated entry design i.e.: between trellis entry and butterfly roof. • Ensure material shown on material board and on architectural plans are consistent. • Provide a longitudinal section through building at the location of the detention tank including the retaining walls. • Be consistent in projections of roofs and patios, including soffit widths. • Remove roof pilasters that overhang the soffit. • Be consistent in projections of roofs and patios, including soffit widths. • Remove roof pilasters that overhang the soffit. • Provide a longitudinal section through building at the location of the detention tank including the retaining walls . • Sustainability and related matters: • Consider offering some adaptable units. • Consider offering sustainable features in the building design and implementation. • Consider providing Electrical Vehicle Charging stations. The ADP concerns have been addressed and are reflected in the current plans. A detailed description of how these items were incorporated into the final design will be included in a future development permit report to Council. City of Maple Ridge TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Development Variance Permit 14155 Marc Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: July 2, 2019 2016-091-DVP cow Development Variance Permit application (2016-091-VP) has been received in conjunction with a rezoning and subdivision application to create a single family urban development of 109 lots in the Silver Valley Area. The requested variance is to: 1. Vary retaining wall height from 1.2 metres to 12.3 metres. A total of 5 over height retaining walls are proposed for this development, with different maximum heights of 5.2, 5.6, 6.5, 9.2, and 12.3 metres. These height variances will only pertain to a portion of the wall, as each wall tapers down at its edges in response to the grade. In all cases, the vertical length of the wall is softened by tiers and landscaping, thereby reducing the visual impact. These walls are needed in order to realize the applicant's development plan and lot yield. This plan has been revised over time through an iterative process in response to community concerns. Given the resulting extent of these variance requests, it was felt that that Council should be given the opportunity to consider this variance request earlier in the rezoning and subdivision approval process. The usual process is to consider a variance application concurrently with final reading of a rezoning application. Should Council have concerns with the wall proposal and not support the variance, the proposed lot yield may be affected. Council will be considering final reading for rezoning application 2016-091-RZ at a later date. Council considered rezoning application 2016-091-RZ and granted first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7254-2016 on June 14, 2016. Council granted first and second reading for Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7416-2017 on January 16, 2018, and second reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7254-2016 on January 16, 2018. This application was presented at Public Hearing on February 20, 2018, and Council granted third reading on February 27, 2018. The date for final approval of the rezoning application is to be determined. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-091-DVP respecting property located at 14155 Marc Road. 1109 Page 1 of 6 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Morningstar Homes Ltd. Legal Description: Lot: 3, Section: 32, Township: 12, Plan: LMP14126 OCP: Zoning: Existing: ECO (Eco Clusters), Conservation, Rural Residential Proposed: Eco Clusters, Conservation Existing: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Proposed: R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District) Surrounding Uses: OCP: North: South: East: West: Use: Vacant Zone: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Designation: Rural Residential & Agricultural Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-1 (Residential District) Designation: Eco Clusters Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Eco Clusters and Conservation Use: Blaney Bog Zone: A-5 (Agriculture Only) Designation: Park within the ALR and Rural Residential Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Urban Residential 30.079 Ha. (7 4.32 acres) Marc Road Urban Standard b) Project Description: This development variance application is to support a rezoning and subdivision application for 109 single family houses in the Silver Valley Area. The site is characterized by complex topography, with steep slopes and watercourses. Since first reading was granted, significant revisions have been made resulting in a more compact development site with less disturbance into pristine portions of the site. As a consequence of these revisions, however, significant lot grading of the development site is proposed, with retaining walls that significantly exceed the maximum permissible in the Zoning Bylaw. Page 2 of 6 The retaining walls will be to stabilize either cutting or filling into the natural grade. For this project, the cuts will be stabilized with a process of soil nails and shotcrete walls. A series of landscaped tiers will break up the height of each wall. The visual effect of this type of tiered wall will be a granite-like rock face with plantings. The placement of fill in the natural grade will be stabilized through sierra walls, which are built using mesh blocks filled with rock. These walls are combined with growing medium to support plants. The visual effect of this type of wall is a steep green slope which can blend into the natural landscape. c) Variance Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for single family development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. The requested variances and rationale for support are described below: 1. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No 3510-1985, Part 4, Section 403, (8): To vary maximum retaining wall height from 1.2 metres (4 ft) to 12.3 metres (40.3 feet). This proposal has evolved with a number of concerns that have been raised, discussed and addressed. The areas that it touches on include the policies of the Official Community Plan, potential liability, seismic stability, public safety and the integration of public infrastructure. These are discussed as follows below: Official Community Plan -Hillside Policies. Policies 5-21 and 5-22 are pertinent to this application, as follows: 5.21 Patterns of density should be encouraged to achieve a mosaic of development sensitive to the natural contours of the land, with retention of mid-slope forested areas and density increased towards upland flat or valley bottom areas, the natural crest of a hill should be respected and development should be set back sufficiently to maintain the slope of the crest and the vegetation along it. Denser forms of horizontal development should be permitted along hillsides only where they can be off-set by sufficiently large open areas and where building modules can be broken into smaller units and carefully sited. It should be noted that roughly 80% of the site (24 hectares or 59 acres) will be dedicated as park, and these dedicated areas will be enhanced and retained in their natural state. This retention of conservation lands was accomplished by concentrating development in the southern portion of the site. 5-22 Landscape disturbance should be minimized by retaining trees and natural vegetation as much as possible and requiring replanting or enhanced planting as a condition for development; providing a minimum of cuts and fills and limiting their depths, minimizing terracing and earth grading, blending graded areas with natural slope, and minimizing the amount of exposed raw earth by phased development and on-site controls. Page 3 of 6 T f I. l The extent of the cuts and fills on the site are restricted to the compact development site, occupying roughly 20% of the site. As noted, these are significant, reflecting the challenges of attaining sufficient density to enable to the project. The tradeoff for the City is the environmental protection that can be achieved with this extensive regrading and filling. An estimated 80% of the site will be dedicated and preserved as parkland which will be accessible to the public through a proposed trails system. This trails system will be integrated with the Regional Parks network of Metro Vancouver, and the UBC Forest. Official Community Plan -Visual Character Policy 5-27 states the following: The protection of views should be encouraged by sensitive site design that maximizes views beyond and between buildings on the site. The visual impact of the landscape alterations will not be apparent at locations close to the development site, but there will likely be viewscape changes from a distance. As these walls will be decorative, planted and tiered, the combination of park dedication and planted walls will continue to appear as significant green space. The applicant has provided a rendering to demonstrate how the developed site will appear from a distance, included in Appendix D. Very few homes exist west of the site in Pitt Meadows or Blaney Bog that would be affected by this change. Legal protection to ensure the walls are planted and maintained appropriately will be attained through a number of restrictive covenants and easements that will be required through the rezoning and subdivision process. These legal documents include: restrictive covenants (no-build) for retaining wall and GeoGrid Protection areas: easements to provide access to planting areas, and easements for retaining wall maintenance, Potential Liability: All of the retaining walls will be on private property and will not be the responsibility of the municipality for repair or maintenance. At the request of the Engineering Department and the Approving Officer, the applicants engaged a second engineering firm to peer review the design of the walls. A few recommendations were made and committed to with this peer review. The Maple Ridge Engineering Department has reviewed this work along with the peer review and is satisfied with this scope of work. These walls have been designed for seismic stability with a minimum lifespan of 70 years. A no disturb covenant will be placed on each lot to ensure these walls are not altered or removed by future homeowners. Public Safety. Protective fencing at the top of each lots wall will provide fall protection for pedestrians although this area of the site does not contain pedestrian paths. Integration of Infrastructure. Storm and sewer have been located outside of the wall stabilization areas, thereby facilitating access to reduce the costs of repair and replacement of these utilities, if required in the future by the City. Page 4 of 6 d) Citizen/Customer Implications: In accordance with the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, notice of Council consideration of a resolution to issue a Development Variance Permit was mailed to all owners or tenants in occupation of all parcels, any parts of which are adjacent to the property that is subject to the permit. Although this development plan has also evolved through community input with the applicant making a clear effort to address the concerns of local residents, this application is the first public notice of the extent of the overheight walls. e) Alternatives: This application follows an unusual process in that this formal request for a variance occurs in advance of final reading or the release of the Preliminary Review letter that outlines subdivision requirements. The decision to bring this before Council at this time is due to the extent of the variance request, as it is integral to the proposed subdivision. At the staff level, there has been some reluctance and concern over the extent of the walls necessary to accommodate this proposal. It is, however a result of the clustering of development and the developer's desire to achieve a certain density and lot yield. However, this variance request is supportable based on the extent of dialogue and revisions the applicant has committed to in addressing concerns. If this application is denied, the applicant will need to revise the development plan in order to reduce the height of retaining walls. This application is timed to provide guidance to the Approving Officer and fairness to both Council to the applicant. It should be noted that the second reading report included graphic examples of retaining walls, although specific heights were not included. At the time of second reading, Council would have had some understanding that retaining walls would be required in order for development to proceed. Should the extent of this variance request exceed Council's comfort, Council may wish to use this opportunity to express a lesser measure and method such as the use of more backfilled slopes for some lots which would reduce the length and height of some proposed walls, that they would be willing to support though a variance request. With this alternative, a second variance application would be required if Council denies this application. However, with this assurance of support from Council, the applications could be revised and proceed with the second variance request brought forward concurrently with final reading. CONCLUSION: The proposed variance is supported because the overall site plan is compact, maximizes the extent of park dedication, and has been revised to address municipal concerns. Although a number of concerns have been noted in the report, this application and this variance request is a reasonable compromise for a difficult site. Page 5 of 6 N Scale: 1 :4,500 Legend -stream ---Ditch Centreline Edge of Marsh Indefinite Creek 1111 Lake or Reservoir [~-f'J Marsh APPENDIX A \ \ I SUBJECT PROPERTY I \ ' \ '\ ' ' 14155 MARC ROAD PIO: 018-620-850 FILE: 2016-091-VP DATE: Jun 4, 2019 BY: MC I Scale: 1 :4,500 APPENDIX 8 14155 MARC ROAD PIO:' 018-620-850 FILE: 2016-091-VP DATE: Jun 4, 2019 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY: MC -~,':_'->,, ,--__ .,,.-1,.<_,~~--::!~.:-~_ ---~ ~ ~ ----_,.,,,.-------SU: GEOTEO<NICAL REPORT (OATEO JJl Y 16, 20IB) FOR APPROXIMATE PEAT LOCATION. IF PEAT JS ENCOUNTERED, EXCAVATION IS REautRED. All EXCAVATION TO BE 11111i1N OElnOP•ENT BOUNOAR!ES, NO ENCROACHMENT llf10 SPEA "1ll. OCOJR 0£0< !£FORE 'YOU CIC lRMATION ON E)(!STING UTILffiES MAY NOT BE COW'l£!E OR \CCURATE ~OR TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACroR SHAU.. 'OS[ LOCATIONS OF ,ILL EXISTh'IG UTIUTlES ANO AOVlS£ TIHE NGINEER OF POIDmAL CONFUCIS. lHIS DRAWING TO BE READ IN CONJJNCTION WllH All OTHER ORA'HNGS FOR UTUJTIES, SERVICE LOCA11CNS, ANC OET~LS. THE EXACT :ATION Of THESE UTILITIES SH,\Ll BE DETERMINED ON SITIE I 2019/04/ol BC ~ RE"1SEO PER QTY COMMENTS 2018/11/13 BC CN R(YIS[D PER OT'f COMMENTS 2018/05/18 BC CN FIRST SUBMISS~ REV"O DATE{Y/M/1) DR'N CH'O APPENDIXC EX. WATER --'b'---EX. SANITARY SEWER ·······--S ··-·---·--0·-· EX. STORM SEVt£R -----D--0-PROP. WAlER --W---PROP. SANITARY SEVi£R --S---PROP. STORM SEWER --D-·····_,..-PROP. SIDEWALK PROP. ARE H'IIJRANT PROP. CATCH BASIN PROP. STREETUCHT ;z /,' ,, 1 11 z,, , \--·-\ \-f-,(_ -~~-J j; ·"·· ·, CITY OF MAPLE JUDGE Engineering Department DESIGNED -BC BRIDLE RIDGE Sl£ , 52~s-20-2ms-091 ORA.WN -BC SUBDIVISION CONSll..TANTS om No-1800 METRIC SCALE -1:1000 KEY PLAN cm APPROvED-"' OVERALL DOC. No-CATE-APR. J, 2019 14155 MARC ROAD. MAPLE RIDG[, BC SHEET 2 Of 87 Diana Hall 11995 Haney Place City of Maple Ridge APPENDIX D ~ MORNINGSTAR 2"' Floor, 946 Brunette Avenue Coquitlam, BC V3K 1C9 Head Office: 604-521-0038 Fax: 604-521-0078 www.mstarhomes.com Re: 2016-091-RZ -Development Variance Permit Application -Retaining Wall Height Diana, Please find below our Development Variance Permit Application for over height retaining walls at our Marc Road development at 14155 Marc Road, Maple Ridge. Requested Variances: Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 Section 403 (8) Maximum Retaining Wall Height: Rock-face soil nail wall with planted terraces: a. To vary the maximum height of the soil nail retaining wall in the rear yards of Lots 10 -28 from 1.2m up to a minimum of 3.lm to a maximum of 12.3m. This retaining wall will consist of up to 4 individual tiers with maximum tier heights of 4.4m. Each tier is spaced from the next with a planted 1.5m terrace. b. To vary the maximum height ofthe soil nail retaining wall in the rear yards of Lots 72 -79 from 1.2m up to a minimum of 1.2m to a maximum of 5.6m. This retaining wall will consist of up to 2.5 individual tiers with maximum tier heights of 3.0m. Each tier is spaced from the next with a planted 1.Sm terrace. Vegetated-face sierra slope wall with hill slope features: a. To vary the maximum height of the vegetated hill slope retaining wall in the rear yards of Lots 1-9 from 1.2m up to a maximum of 5.2m. b. To vary the maximum height of the vegetated hill slope retaining wall in the rear yards of Lots 32-36 from 1.2m up to a maximum of 6.5m. c. To vary the maximum height of the vegetated hill slope retaining wall in the rear yards of Lots 83-98 from 1.2m up to a maximum of 9.2m. 112016-091-RZ A\. MORNINGSTAR Justification for over height walls: 2"' Floor, 946 Brunette Avenue Coquitlam, BC V3K 1C9 Head Office: 604-521-0038 Fax: 604-521-0078 www.mstarhomes.com In response to strong public and political feedback against the proposed secondary access point into the site through Anderson Creek Drive that was eventually removed, over height retaining walls were required to create a feasible lot layout as road grade and lot grading requirements posed further restraints. With thorough feedback from municipal staff and design consultants on the aesthetics and functionality of these retaining walls, two types of walls have been designed and supported: Rock-scape terraced and planted soil nail walls, and vegetated-face hill slope sierra walls. As requested by City Staff, the geotechnical design drawings have been peer-reviewed and supported by GeoWest Consultants. Also, both walls feature native plants that require little to no maintenance, and add an aesthetic and naturalized look to the neighbourhood. Furthermore, as a developer and builder, we can use the wall systems to comprehensively grade the site to create recommended features outlined in the Silver Valley Area Plan: 82 of 109 homes facing significant natural features (Parkland, Forests, Blaney Bog) Traffic calming cul-de-sacs with naturalized features Pockets of nature throughout the neighbourhood, Playground/park area in a central location for the neighbourhood; and Useable, functional back yards with incredible westward views of the Blaney Bog At Morningstar we use in-depth questionnaires that are sent to each new homeowner to find out what they liked best and what we could have done to make their home better. We've done this for all 2,000+ homes we have built and sold in the last 21 years. These questionnaires offer incredible insight to what home owners want when they purchase a new home. One of the most common comments that we receive is how much people love their functional back yards. As a developer who builds on our own lots, we do not try to create the cheapest lots possible. Over height retaining walls are expensive but on the Marc Road site they will allow Morningstar the opportunity to offer a useable and functional rear yard to as many homes as possible, while creating an eco-cluster inspired neighbourhood with many features outlined in the Silver Valley Neighbourhood Plan. The images shown below of these typical walls have been shared at development information meetings, neighbourhood meetings, with councillors, city staff and home buyers, resulting in favourable responses prompting our application. 212016-091-RZ :- Vegetated-Face Hillslope Sierra Wall 312016-091-RZ ~ MORNINGSTAR 2"' Floor, 946 Brunette Avenue Coquitlam, BC V3K 1C9 Head Office: 604-521-0038 Fax: 604-521-0078 www.mstarhomes.com Rock-scape Terraced and Planted Soil Nail Walls 412016-091-RZ ~ MORNINGSTAR 2"' Floor, 946 Brunette Avenue Coquitlam, BC V3K 1C9 Head Office: 604-521-0038 Fax: 604-521-0078 www.mstarhomes.com ""-RTCFN 1/'4dN1/2ofNE 114 Urban Area Bounda~ I I I \ \ \ \ ,, \\ \ \ \ EPP1516 APPENDIX E , ________ _ :1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. 1. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~1P.14~7 • • • • • • • • • ,__ .. -__ --< 36 35 I , , , , , , , , • •,,,,,,,,,,,,, •,,,,,,,,,,',,, P:10 15 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. Purpose: From: 7416-2017 969 To Amend Silver Valley Area Plan Figure 2 Eco Cluster and Conservation To: D Conservation ~ Eco Cluster - - -Urban Area Boundary MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia ~ Neighbourhood Park 6 N SCALE 1:5,000 [~-mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: FILE NO: July 2, 2019 2018-089-DVP cow FROM: SUBJECT: Chief Administrative Officer Development Variance Permit 14310 256 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING: Development Variance Permit application 2018-089-VP has been received in conjunction with a application to subdivide the property located at 14310 256 Street in two industrial lots under the current M-2 (General Industrial) zone. The existing services and utilities within 256 Street are sufficient as-is. The requested variance is to omit the requirement to upgrade services and utilities on 256 Street. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2018-089-DVP be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-089-DVP respecting property located at 14310 256 Street. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: South: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: OTG Developments AA-Class Auto Holding Ltd & Nagin Enterprises Inc Lot 6, District Lot 5326, New Westminster District Plan LMP41830 IND (Industrial) Industrial M-2 (General Industrial) M-2 (General Industrial) Vacant Industrial M-2 (General Industrial) Industrial Industrial M-2 (General Industrial) Industrial 1110 Page 1 of 3 f. I I East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Access: Servicing: Lot Size: Concurrent Applications: b) Project Description: Vacant Industrial M-2 (General Industrial) Industrial Industrial M-2 (General Industrial) Industrial Industrial Industrial 256 Street Rural 1.07 ha (2.5 acre) 2018-089-SD and 2018-089-WP/NFDP The subject property is approximately 2.5 acres in size (see Appendix A) and i$ located north of 142 Ave and 256 Street, close to the city boundary in the Alica area. The subject property is bound by industrial lots to the south and west, and a large vacant lot stretching north and east. A watercourse, identified as Mud Creek, is on the vacant lot, with a significant sloped ridge west of the creek, extending onto the subject property. c) Variance Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. The requested variances and rationale for support are described below (see Appendices Band C): 1. Subdivision and Development Services Bylaw No. 4800-1993, Schedule A -Services and Utilities: To omit the requirement to upgrade/construct services and utilities on 256 Street. Existing services and utilities on 256 Street are sufficient as-is, and no upgrades as described in aforementioned Schedule A, are required. Therefore the variance can be supported. The existing roadside gravel road shoulder horse trail is noted to be maintained as a requirement of subdivision. In accordance with the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, notice of Council consideration of a resolution to issue a Development Variance Permit was mailed to all owners or tenants in occupation of all parcels, any parts of which are adjacent to the property that is subject to the permit. Page 2 of 3 N Scale: 1 :2,500 14301 14245 I ; I ' I I I I I /; I Legend I ' I -stream I \ I I 14320 14310 14250 --· Ditch Centreline ------Edge of Marsh - -Indefinite Creek -Lake or Reservoir ~ :;fS::j Marsh 142 AVE. APPENDIX A I ' I i ' I I I I I I I ' I 14310 256 STREET FILE: 2018-089-VP DATE: Mar 23, 2018 PLANNING DEPARTMENT mapleridge.ca BY:PC ...... Scale: 1 :2,500 APPENDIX B 14310 256 STREET FILE: 2018-089-VP DATE: Mar 23, 2018 BY: PC City of Maple Ridge TO: FROM: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: July 2, 2019 2019-210-DVP cow SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit 22768 & 22772 119 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Development Variance Permit application (2019-210-DVP) has been received for a parking reduction for a development proposal on the subject property noted above. A previous development permit for Town Centre Commercial and a development variance permit were approved by Council on March 18, 2018 to permit the construction of a mixed use building combining 1858m2 (20,000 ft2) of office space and 94 below market rental housing units. The proposal is being advanced by a non-profit organization (Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Community Services Council) who will be operating in partnership with BC Housing to provide affordable rental housing to low income individuals and families. The previous variance request included a reduction of 13 stalls. This request for a parking reduction is for 1 less stall, amounting to a total request between the two applications for a variance of 14 parking stalls. This parking reduction is supported by a parking reduction study, prepared by a qualified professional. The requested variance is to: 1. Vary required parking from 126 stalls to 112 stalls. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2019-210-DVP be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2019-210-DVP respecting property located at 22768 & 22772 119th Avenue. DISCUSSION: a} Background Context Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Bissky Architecture And Urban Design Inc. Lot: B, D.L.: 401, Block: 3, Plan: NWP21553 & Lot: B, D.L.: 401, Block: 3, Plan: NWP21553 TCCOMM (Town Centre Commercial) TCCOMM (Town Centre Commercial) C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) 1111 Page 1 of 3 Surrounding Uses: North: South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: b) Project Description: Vacant CS-1 Service Commercial Low Rise Apartment Shopping Mall C-3 Town Centre Commercial Town Centre Commercial Vacant RM-6 Highrise Apartment Medium High Apartment Bowling Alley C-3 Town Centre Commercial Town Centre Commercial Office Building Mixed Use office and non-market housing 2750 m2 228th Street Urban Standard This parking reduction request follows a previous Development Permit application (2017-385-DP) and Development Variance Permit application (2017-385-DVP) that were both approved previously by Council. This additional request is the further reduction of 1 parking stall. This development proposal includes a mixed use development comprising approximately 1858 m2 (20,000 square feet) of office and program space for Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Community Services (MRPMCS) on the first two storeys of the building. A portion of the second storey will also accommodate below market rental housing, for a total of 94 affordable residential units between the second and the sixth storeys. These housing units will conform to BC Housing design requirements varying from studio to 3 bedroom apartments and will include accessible units. Parking is located mostly underground with some on grade at the south lane and along the west side. Main entries to the various functions occur along the north facade on 119th, although some staff and secondary entries have been designed along the south side of the building. A 2 storey high central lobby is the main focal point for MRPMCS, providing control and a sense of community for the entire building. The residential entry is adjacent. Amenity spaces are provided, including a tenant area and an outdoor deck on the second floor. A secure outdoor play area for children has been provided on grade at the south side as well. c) Variance Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for single family development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. The requested variances and rationale for support are described below: Maple Ridge Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No 4350 -1990, ( Part 10, Section 10.2): To reduce required parking for multi-family non-market from a total required 88 stalls to 7 4 stalls (residential use). Page 2 of 3 12047 ~ 11971 11947 f----11937 11980 11970 LANE 11940/48 L, 12032 12028 /30 -~ r--g: 12026 -DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD r--r--~ ~~ ~ ,'!: r--g: "'r--"' "'"' "' 2:!.__ I 11969 11963 11953 ;;; "' "' ~ ~ "' g: ,___ 11954 11940 <o "' "' g: APPENDIX A <o <o <o "' ~ "' "' "' "' "' "' f--' Cl) f-f-w z D:'. :, al 11960 11920/36 11920 i ~ ~ ~UBJECT PROPERTY I L__~-------"--...l.___---'-------"-'-'-=\\ I 11940 11930 119AVE. 11935 11920 11917 11900 11910 LANE 11910 11903 11893 11890 11900 f-----f--' Cl) ;:: r--N 11876 g: N 11890 SELKIRK AVE. 11887 11880 11865 11830 11858 l-.../ 11844 11851 11868 f----11856 118AAVE. 11843 r------.. 11844 f--' Cl) 11821 f-f-11836 w z D:'. :, al 11824 11816 11808 11797 I 11790 _,o,°' 22768/72 119 AVENUE PIO: 016-029-500 PLANNING DEPARTMENT N •••• mapleridge.ca Scale: 1 :2,500 2019-210-VP DATE: Jun 11, 2019 BY:MC ! Scale: 1 :2,500 APPENDIX B 22768/72 119 AVENUE PIO: 016-029-500 PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Jun 11, 2019 BY:MC Zoning Information Requlrod/E~!•6n9: Propou d/Provldod: 1 ,-· ··"-~' '" :::;•ight : lolC,..,plh; 27m LatC:O..ras,o: 100% Co,,..,_AC!Mlyi\lHC /lolRnldenhlUflits: 0.0 m O.Om l tn~SideYar<lSolbaclc 0 .. 0• s~~:S.:floor 2Apartmen!5 m Rear Sf>lbKI<: S.1bx1<1At,o....,Floor 3 W.riar Sid•YardS01bad<: 0.80/unlt 1 Bedm: O.&l:1/unlt 2e.d<m: 1.00/unlt JBedrm: 1.10/unlt Residefl!illV,sik>"P•tl<ing: Ccwnme•ci.at I H.andicapAa:es>lble Pa rl<il'!I Smal Pa,l,.ingSlaoUsAUowed:0.1 Bicy<:l•P1,king: 1 9<:yd<,RequirementsResidenli.ll L<ng Tenn: 11 4 lJnii, 32AS1.tls 6 S!ories - ~uni .. 1,911.6 m2 O.Om O.Om .,. o.om 40.0Sl.tb 13S!als 14.JSl.th SSlalls 20,5781qfl 51.14 51q lt ;1,2.o s 1a111 Varianc.R•q"d •a Z.55lah i5S1a11s 12.5Slals '11 Slalls 24 51 .. 11, 3-ISlalt.o Residenti al Unit Matri x Calculations INon Market Housing Net Area jUraTyp,,Bedrooms 548SF 0 51.8m2 557 SF 0 S0.8m2 I .. M ,-~ .,,_, llful.AS 18odffl\ 52.2m2 Unite S1u6o \Mil.C S11JC1io I""' ""'' " 13 13.8'/o l#olJSed<ooms: S 5.3'!. ,_ PRELIMINARY ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRU CT ION Acco,.ible 9,409SF 1,078.7 m2 t1,611 S F 186.0m2 2,002SF 41 4.9 m2 4.466SF 1,071.7 m2 S,327 SF Fl oor Area Ratios FSR(Ne!Area) ParkUlg Res!dentlal Cammerc!•I IUndefgrouo(IPalQlg Z7,513 SF Floot 1 l list of Varian ces Type I Sitt'.ng f rontSetbackFloOf3-6 S11Ung Rear5etbackF1oor3-6 ResidenlialParking 119th Avenue 1J,J05 SF 13,JOSSF 13,l(WSF 14,68-ISF 15,\49SF 5,692SF 13,257SF l J ,J 05SF 1,890SF 13,:)05SF 1,890SF 13.243SF 5,155Sf 13,1(),ISf 1,690SF 11 ,414SF Required Requested 7.Sm O.Om 7.5m 2.5m 8'1Slalls 72Stalls Existing Property Leg~I "' 11'Xl7 228111 St M3j>kR;dge BC "' 0.0% 74.5% 85.8 "4 85.8% IS.I% "' 90.2'1. e;=~:t "•menl>Commercla:/?50m2 2.Sillls JSlarll ~onl~~.~:r J• /' '°'~:.~ ; •~-, ,.,/'~~::~B~lge ~ : """' ,,,,oo., ,...... .... ~ "''"''"'":\ , .. _ ~ [/"'"'"""" ~~ . ~-,- """' '"'"'"'-·L'--("',."'" btremo•td \" -. E.<i11i<lqConc:,ole Cu,t, C o'inmFm:i;'ii/ Re!<:ide nli:tl ~-----------------~"'::::;::~"~\"'-y,.,_ Piaonlirig :1-:1 -1-·1 -.!-il d 1 ' ,; .~2CormwrdelP..,.,,,gSiaon,offlane r J ' -~· ... , ·1 ' • '"" "i,"'":":j " ! ______ : ___ ! ___ 1 ~1m . ~~-;;:;;:~.~ .. -~7~;;;;:::;,~~L~a~ne Proposed Site Plan Sc:ale :3132"•1'·0" ~ f'l!tlf ll.! :-a!.;z (I !·ll!:irn. 1iHH1i iJ Wl!IJllt· ii!df1•!~z 1 !j·dilW • ! ~l~:1!a·!~l jJ i iii'@il·l § h unhl 1community .?'..S ERVICES (;l .. ~T .. 1 1·"t 4J'fl,,' n Q) t:f i Ii 2 :. CJ) n l) ~8 2 a_ 0:: ~ C .£'l "'"' a: :: Q) C ;::: Q) rn E 'O c_ Q) 0 w m 0 > c_ Q) eo a_ oil u >-. >'.z <f) O z ~~ffi zz c ~ 1; ~ ij ~ :~ J~L U)~ Jf;} w O!a f ~l .t z w~ .., . ..,'£ ~~! ~.!jl s: ~· !l,l ~ ,A.# A ·/ ~~<,a-·,'' ~,_'<ct A20 1 )> -c -c n, z 0 >< (") I~.-,~-' . City of Maple Ridge '-------TO: FROM: mapleridge.ca His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: July 2, 2019 11-5255-70-136 cow SUBJECT: Award of Contract ITI-EN19-35: Dewdney Trunk Road Watermain Replacement (Edge Street to 228 Street) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The existing watermains along Dewdney Trunk Road (DTR) from Edge Street to 228 Street and on 227 Street 200m north of DTR were installed in the 1970's and have been identified for replacement as part of the City's Annual Watermain Replacement Program. Similar to the successfully completed 2018 watermain project on 232 Street (DTR to 121 Avenue), the City is planning to expand the fibre optic network by installing ducts in the abandoned watermains as part of this work. This project is included in the 2019 Financial Plan. The Dewdney Trunk Road Watermain Replacement Project from Edge Street to 228 Street consists of the installation of approximately 7 45m of ductile iron watermain, varying in size from 150mm to 300mm diameter, water service connection transfers, installation of new fire hydrants and pavement surface restoration. There is optional IT work included in the tender to utilize the abandoned watermain for fibre optic ducts, including the installation of junction boxes and pulling three 32mm ducts through the existing watermain. City crews will complete tie-ins of the new watermain to the City water system. The Invitation to Tender was issued on May 24, 2019 and closed on June 20, 2019 with five (5) bids received. The lowest compliant tender price was submitted by Pedre Contractors Ltd. of $1,121,237 excluding taxes. The watermain installation is funded from the Water Utility Fund, and additional funding is required for the water tie-ins to the City system and to cover contract costs that are over budget. Funding to install ducting for future fibre optic expansion is coming from the IT Fibre Optic Network project budget. Council approval to award the contract is required for the work to proceed. RECOMMENDATION: That Contract ITI-EN19-35: Dewdney Trunk Road Watermain Replacement (Edge Street to 228 Street), be awarded to Ped re Contractors Ltd. in the amount of $1,121,237excluding taxes; and That a construction contingency of $112,124 be approved to address potential variations in field conditions; and That the next Financial Plan Bylaw be amended to increase the project funding by $220,361.00 from the Water Utility Fund; and further That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 1112 11-5255-70-136 Page 1 of 4 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The existing watermains along Dewdney Trunk Road (DTR) from Edge Street to 228 Street and on 227 Street 200m north of DTR were installed in the 1970's and have been identified for replacement as part of the City's Annual Watermain Replacement Program. Similar to the successfully completed 2018 watermain project on 232 Street (DTR to 121 Avenue), the City is planning to expand the fibre optic network by installing ducts in the abandoned watermains as part of this work. This project is included in the 2019 Financial Plan. The Dewdney Trunk Road Watermain Replacement Project from Edge Street to 228 Street consists of the installation of approximately 7 45m of ductile iron watermain, varying in size from 150mm to 300mm diameter, water service connection transfers, installation of new fire hydrants and pavement surface restoration. There is optional IT work included in the tender to utilize the abandoned watermain for fibre optic ducts, including the installation of junction boxes and pulling three 32mm ducts through the existing watermain. City crews will complete tie-ins of the new watermain to the City water system. Tender Evaluation The Invitation to Tender was issued on May 24, 2019 and closed on June 20, 2019 with five (5) bids received, listed below from lowest to highest price. Pedre Contractors Ltd. Sandpiper Contracting LLP Complete Utility Contracting Ltd. Richco Contracting Ltd. J. Cote & Son Excavating Ltd. Tender Price (excluding taxes} $1,121,237 $1,127,558 $1,161,680 $1,345,258 $1,510,000 The lowest compliant bid was $1,121,237 (excluding taxes) from Pedre Contractors Ltd. McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd, the City's consultant, has evaluated the bids and completed satisfactory reference checks and recommends the contract be awarded to Pedre Contractors Ltd. b) Desired Outcome: To provide reliable fire protection and high quality drinking water to Maple Ridge residents. c) Strategic Alignment: One of the key strategies in the Corporate Strategic Plan is to manage existing infrastructure. Replacement and upgrading of the aging watermain and fire hydrants on Dewdney Trunk Road will ensure reliability of service and provide capacity for future years. Installation of ducts in the abandoned watermain will support the City's long-term plan to extend fibre optic network and service throughout the City. 11-5255-70-136 Page 2 of 4 I d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The estimated construction duration is approximately eight weeks starting in mid-July 2019. It is anticipated that traffic lanes through the work zone will be reduced during construction by shifting to the south. Most of the watermain replacement works are proposed for the north side of the road adjacent to the sidewalk. Some of the fronting properties may be impacted during water service connection installations, and residents will be notified in advance of the work. Every effort will be made to minimize the impact to residents and businesses fronting the watermain installation on Dewdney Trunk Road. As well, the general public will be informed of the traffic alerts and construction progress through the City's website and social media sources. e) Interdepartmental Implications: The Operations Department has provided input during the design stage. The Information Technology Department has worked closely with Engineering to utilize the abandoned watermain as fibre optic ducting for future use. Tie-ins to the live water system will be completed by the Operations Department. A City staff inspector will provide inspection services during construction. f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The projected expenditures excluding taxes are as follows: Consulting Water Tie-ins (Operations) Construction Contract (Pedre Contractors Ltd.) Contract Contingency Total Projected Project Cost The project funding sources are as follows: Water Capital Fund (WCF) (LTC No. 18018.1) Operations Watermain Replacement (LTC No. 002190) IT Department Fibre Optics (LTC No. 017093) Additional funding from WCF required Total Funding Sources $ 92,000 185,000 1,121,237 112,124 $ 1,510,361 $ 1,025,000 200,000 65,000 220,361 $ 1,510,361 The project expenditures include a contract contingency of $112,124 that will only be utilized if required to address potential variations in field conditions. 11-5255-70-136 Page 3 of 4 CONCLUSIONS: The tender price of $1,121,237(excluding taxes) by Pedre Contractors Ltd. for the Dewdney Trunk Road Watermain Replacement Project from Edge Street to 228 Street is the lowest compliant tender. It is recommended that Council approve the award of the contract to Pedre Contractors Ltd. and a contract contingency of $112,124 be approved. It is also recommended that funds be transferred from the Water Utility Fund to LTC No. 18018.1. Prepared by: Financial: Concurrence: Reviewed by: Approved by: Concurrence: Attachments: (A) Map pson,BBA,CPA,CGA ial Officer mer, PEng. ~"PUer David Pollock, PEng. General Manager Engineering Services ~itl Acting Chi~inistrative Officer 11-5255-70-136 Page 4 of 4 ~ D J J J J i-..: Ul w Cl 0 w I I I I ., ., ., 121 AVE. BROWN AVE. i I I I ; I ., ., ., ., .LJ DEi VDNE '( TRU NK ROA) 1-Ul w Cl 0 w n MclNTOSH AVE. SELKIRK AVE. ' 119 AVE. II I ~ ~ I II " N I ~I I ~ ~ -II I ~ I ., ., '-' IL. B~ I I l_ I I n i-..: i-..: Ul Ul CX) 0::: N w N I u I-w _J u... '---------------.., -//////////1 ~"'-I I I SELKIRK AVI . I I DEWDNEY TRUNK ROA[ 119 AVE. LMJ E i-..: Ul CX) N N [ PROPOSED WA TERMAIN REPLACEMENT r / / / / j PROPOSED FIBRE OPTIC DUCT INSTALLATION N A CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD WA TERMAIN REPLACEMENT EDGE STREET -228 STREET ITT-EN19-35 SCALE: 1--------------.-------------1 N.T.S. DATE: JUNE 2019 FILE/DWG No SK0421 L 1~1=-City of Maple Ridge TO: mapleridge.ca His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: July 2, 2019 FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: CoW SUBJECT: 2019 Community Grant EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City has received an application for a Community Grant in the amount of $5,000 from the Jamia Riyadhul Jannah British Columbia Foundation (the Foundation). The grant will be used to complete necessary renovations at the heritage property the Foundation is using as a mosque. This project is eligible for support under Council's Community Grant policy. Supporting this request will leave $40,000 available for any additional applications that may be received this year. RECOMMENDATION: That a Community Grant of $5,000 be awarded to the Jamia Riyadhul Jannah British Columbia Foundation DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The Jamia Riyadhul Jannah British Columbia Foundation (the Foundation) purchased a heritage property in Maple Ridge in late 2018 and began using it as a mosque at the beginning of 2019. This is the first community mosque in the City, and offers the local Muslim Community a place of worship. While we understand BC Assessment will be classifying the property as a place of worship starting with the 2020 property tax year, it was not eligible to be classed as such for 2019, meaning that the property was not eligible for either a statutory or a permissive property tax exemption for the current year. Consequently, the Foundation received a property tax bill for 2019 and there are no legislative avenues available to waive or reduce the amount levied. As a result, the Foundation is faced with having to defer necessary renovations to the building and has asked that Council consider awarding them a Community Grant to allow this work to proceed at this time. This request for one-time funding is aligned with Council's Community Grant Policy. b) Desired Outcome: To support the Foundation with necessary renovations to the heritage building they are using as a place of worship. 1131 2241121 Page 1 of 2 l r c) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The requested funding can be provided within the 2019 budget envelope, leaving $40,000 available for any additional applications that may be received this year. d) Alternatives: Council could chose not to support the request for funding. That would result in the Foundation deferring necessary renovations to the heritage building they are using as a place of worship. CONCLUSIONS: The request for funding received from the Foundation is aligned with Council's Community Grant Policy and staff is recommending the request be supported. Prepared by: Catherine Nolan, CPA, CGA Corporate Controller Concurrence: 2241121 Page 2 of 2 TO: FROM: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: July 2, 2019 2221641 cow SUBJECT: Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Arts Council Proposed Bylaw Amendments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Arts Council Society (MRPMAC) operates the ACT Arts Centre on behalf of the City through an operating agreement. Section 9, Schedule F of the operating agreement requires the MRPMAC to provide advance notice of any constitution or bylaw changes to Council before bringing this forward to their membership. The MRPMAC Board of Directors is proposing a change to the Society's Constitution and Bylaws to comply with the BC Societies Act, provide further clarity and manage minor housekeeping items. Staff have reviewed the proposed changes and found that they are consistent with the City's terms and conditions in the operating agreement. RECOMMENDATION: That the changes to the proposed Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Arts Council Society's bylaw referenced in City of Maple Ridge report dated July 2, 2019 be endorsed. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The MRPMAC operates the ACT Arts Centre and holds a lease and operating agreement with the City. The MRPMAC Board of Directors conducted a review of their constitution and bylaws to ensure compliance with requirements of the BC Societies Act, provide further clarification to clauses, and to clean up the existing document. The updated Society's Constitution and Bylaws has been reviewed by their legal attorney, Martha Rans and her recommendations have been included in the proposed version. Ms. Rans specializes in the legal needs of non-profits, charities, and digital creatives and has an extensive knowledge of the BC Societies Act. The changes are consistent with the terms and conditions of the operating agreement. Articles of note include moving previous bylaw/constitution clauses to governance policies such as clauses relating to staff, revenue and expenditure and the election of officers and directors (attached for reference). Ms. Rans provided these recommended changes based on best practices to allow the Board to make regular and timely updates. A number of articles were amalgamated under the Article 1 -Membership including employees of the society may become non-voting members which was formerly contained in Article 8 -Staff and from Article 9 -Meetings. 1151 2221641 Page 1of2 Lastly, a number of housekeeping items were addressed including formatting to the document alignment with the BC Societies Act regarding the appointment of replacement Board Members and notification periods. b} Desired Outcome: The desired outcome is to ensure that Council is kept informed regarding any constitution and/or bylaw changes, and that the proposed changes meet the terms and conditions set out in the Operating Agreement with the Society. c} Strategic Alignment: In the Parks, Recreation & Culture Master Plan (2010) one of the values is a collaborative community which supports independence by citizens and community groups in the provision of Parks, Recreation and Cultural services for the community, utilizing the community development approach as a guideline. d} Citizen/Customer Implications: The Arts Council's proposed amendments follow best practices and will not affect resident and visitor access to their services and programs. e} Business Plan/Financial Implications: There are no financial implications from these amendments. CONCLUSION: The Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Arts Council will make some changes to their constitution and bylaws to clarify, reformat sections with numbering and amend some of the clauses. A revised copy of their Society's Constitution and Bylaws will be filed with the City once the changes are approved at their upcoming Annual General Meeting in October. pare by: Yv nne Chui & Community Connections Manager Reviewed by: Danielle Pope Director of Recreation & Community Engagement ~?:ti Approved by: Concurrence: Attachments: (A) Arts Council Societies Act Constitution and Bylaws 2221641 Page 2 of2 I ~ 'SOCIETIES ACT' CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS OF MAPLE RIDGE AND PITT MEADOWS ARTS COUNCIL (Article 1 = name of Society) ARTICLE 2 -PURPOSES The purpose of this Society shall be to increase and broaden the opportunities for citizens to enjoy and to participate in cultural activities, and shall include the following activities: 1. To provide for the coordination and provision of visual, literary and performing arts opportunities for the benefit ofresidents of the region. 2. To stimulate and encourage the development of cultural projects and activities. 3. To render service to all participating groups. 4. To act as a clearinghouse for information on cultural projects and activities. 5. To foster interest and pride in the cultural heritage of this community. 6. To enlist public interest and promote public understanding of cultural groups to the community. 7. To bring to the attention of civic, provincial and federal authorities the cultural needs of this community. 8. To provide scholarships to students pursuing education in the arts to students in the School District 42 catchment area. MAPLE RIDGE PITT MEADOWS ARTS COUNCIL SCHEDULE A BYLAWS (including proposed amendments 2019) ARTICLE 1 -MEMBERSHIP 1.1 There are two classes of members voting and non-voting. Regular voting members are: a) A person, subscribing to the objects of the Society and engaged in or interested in cultural activities may apply to the directors for membership in the Society and on acceptance by the directors and on payment of the annual dues set forth, shall be a member. b) A group or business may apply for membership. Upon acceptance by the Board they must appoint a designated representative to attend and vote at general meetings. 1.2 Employees of the society may become non-voting members of the Society. 1.3 All members are in good standing except a member who has failed to pay the current annual membership fees or any other subscription or debt due and owing by the member to the Society and the member is not in good standing so long as the debt remains unpaid. 1.4 A person shall cease to be a member of the Society: a) by delivering their resignation in writing to the secretary of the Society or by mailing or delivering it to the address of the Society, or b) on their death or in the case of a group, business, society or corporation on dissolution, or c) by being expelled, or d) by failing to pay the annual membership fees 1.5 A member may be expelled by a special resolution of the members passed at a general meeting or by a majority vote of the Board of Directors. 1.6 Every member shall uphold the constitution and comply with these by-laws and all Society policies. 1.7 Annual membership fees in the Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Arts Council shall be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. 1.8 Meeting of Members a) The Annual General Meeting of the Society shall be held within 120 days from the fiscal year end upon a date and at a time set by the Directors. b) Special General Meetings may be called by the Board of Directors at any time. c) At least fourteen days regular or electronic written notice of all Annual and General Meetings of the Council shall be given the members, specifying the time and place of such meeting. d) At all General Meetings of the Society each individual member in good standing who is personally present, shall be entitled to one vote and a group or business member may appoint a representative to vote on their behalf. A member in good standing is one who has paid their membership dues and been ratified by the Board. 2 , I --i I ; e) No business shall be transacted at any Annual or Special General Meeting unless a quorum consisting of 15 (fifteen) members in good standing shall be present. t) If 10% of the members of the society in good standing request the calling of a Special General Meeting in writing, specifying therein the object for which such a meeting is called, the Board of Directors must call the Special Meeting in accordance with the Societies Act. g) Accidental omission to give notice to, or the non-receipt of notice by, any of the members entitled to receive notice, does not invalidate proceedings at the meeting. ARTICLE 2 -DIRECTORS 2.1 There shall be a maximum of thirteen elected Directors of the Society including Past President. ARTICLE 3 -ELECTION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS 3.1 A nominating Committee comprised of a minimum of three members of the society, the Chair of which shall be a member of the Board of Directors, shall be appointed by the Board a minimum of one hundred and twenty days prior to each Annual General Meeting and such Nominating Committee shall present the nominations for Directors to the membership for election at the Annual General Meeting. The Nominating Committee may submit a report of recommendations of Directors to be elected. 3.2 No salaried employee, nor any member of the family of such employee of the Society shall be eligible to election as Director for the duration of such employee's employment with the Society, nor for a period of two years thereafter, nor shall any member of the family of a Director become eligible to be elected a Director during the term of office of such Director. 3.3 For the purposes of the foregoing, "family member" shall be defined as: father, mother, siblings, children, husband, wife, common law partner, same sex partner, grandparents, grandchildren, stepparents, stepchildren, stepbrothers or sisters or step grandparents or step grandchildren. 3.4 Subject to the foregoing, the Directors of the Society shall be elected from and by the membership of the Society at the Annual General Meeting. The Directors of the Society shall each be elected for a three-year term. The three-year terms shall be staggered so that each year four directors are elected. At each succeeding Annual General Meeting, four directors shall be elected for a three-year term. Whenever a Director's position has been vacated midterm it will be specified upon election of a new Director what length of term is being filled. 3.5 The maximum term served by any Director of the Society shall normally be six consecutive years except that the President may remain on the Board for seven years. 3.6 The Directors shall elect from among their number the Executive Committee each year immediately following the Annual General Meeting by a majority vote. The Executive Committee of the Society shall be: Past President, President, Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer. ARTICLE 4 -REPLACEMENT AND REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS 4.1 Director vacancies may be filled from the membership by the Directors as needed. The length of time served, whether as an appointee or as an elected Director serving out the remainder of a vacant Director's term, will not count towards the six consecutive year limit. 4.2 The Society may by special resolution remove any director before the expiration of their period of office and may by ordinary resolution appoint another member of the Society in his place in the manner set out in the Societies Act. 3 ARTICLE 8 -AUDITORS 8.1 The accounts of the Society shall be examined by an independent accountant, and that accountant will prepare an annual financial statement in the form of an audited financial report to be presented to the membership at the Annual General Meeting. ARTICLE 9-INSPECTION 9 .1 The official records of the Society pursuant to s. 20( 1) of the Act will be open to the inspection of the Members. Members, and other persons, do not have the right to inspect or seek the disclosure of any other official record of the Society, including the Director's meeting minutes and accounting records, without the Board's approval and at their sole discretion. The Board of the Society will establish procedures for the inspection and disclosure of any official records. ARTICLE 10 -AMENDMENTS 10.1 This Constitution may be added to, altered or amended by a two-thirds majority of the members present at any Annual or General Meeting of the Society, provided that notice of such addition, alteration or amendment shall have been delivered to the members 14 days in advance of the meeting. ARTICLE 11 -NOTICE 11.1 A notice may be given to a Member or a Director either personally, by delivery, courier or by mail posted to such person's Registered Address, or, where a Member or Director has provided a fax number or e-mail address, by fax or e-mail, respectively. ARTICLE 12 -MUNICIPAL LIAISONS 12.1 Liaisons from community and civic organizations are received from time to time as deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors and/or as outlined in agreements. All liaisons shall be non-voting members of the Board and shall not attend in camera meetings of the Board. ARTICLE 13 -DISSOLUTION 13 .1 That upon winding up or dissolution of the Society, the assets which remain after payment of all costs, charges and expenses which are properly incurred in the winding up shall be distributed to such, charitable arts organization or organizations registered under the provisions of the Income Tax Act (Canada) as may be determined by the members of the Society at the time of winding up or dissolution. ARTICLE 14 -PLACE OF OPERATION 14.1 The operations of the Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Arts Council are to be chiefly carried on in the area known as School District 42, in the Province of British Columbia. 5 1- Attachment One -Bylaw to Operational Policies Article 8 -Staff: a) The Board of Directors will approve the hiring of the Executive Director and the Executive Director will be responsible for the hiring of additional staff b) The Board of Directors will approve the remuneration budget established for employees c) Staff who become members of the society will have non-voting status Article 11 -Revenue and Expenditure a) All funds raised by donations, raffles, lotteries, admission charges, and the sale of goods and services or otherwise, by the Society or by any of its sections or committees, actmg as such, shall be considered general funds of the Society, and subject to the accounting procedures approved by the Board of Directors b) All funds expended by the Society or by any of its sections or committees acting as such, shall be considered general expenditures of the society, and be subjected to the approval of the Board of Directors and to the accounting procedures approved by the Board c) Board members are Volunteers and as such are entitled to reasonable out of pocket expenses while conducting board business but are not entitled to any further compensation Article 5 -Election of Officers and Directors a) The Nomination Committee shall issue a call for nominations from the members a minimum of 60 days prior to the Annual General Meeting. Nominations must be presented to the Nominating Committee 45 days in advance of the Annual General Meeting.