Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-09-01 Committee of the Whole Agenda and Reports.pdfCity of Maple Ridge COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA September 1, 2020 1:30 p.m. Virtual Online Meeting including Council Chambers Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more information or clarification before proceeding to Council. The meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge. For virtual public participation during Community Forum please register by going to www.mapleridge.ca/640/Council-Meeting and clicking on the meeting date 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 2.1 Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting of July 21, 2020 3.DELEGATIONS/STA FF PRESENTATIONS 4.PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Note: • • Owners and/or Agents of development applications on this agenda may be permitted to speak to their item with a time limit of 10 minutes. The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda where further debate and voting will take place, upon Council decision to forward them to that venue. 1101 2018-182-RZ, 11040 Cameron Court, RS-2 to RS-1d Staff report dated September 1, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7562-2019 to rezone from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-1d (One Family Urban [Half Acre] Residential) to permit approximately 6 single family lots of not less than 557 m2 in area each be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D, E and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for a subdivision application. 1102 2020-066-RZ, 11886 , 11892 and 11902 232 Street, RS-1 to RM-1 Staff report dated September 1, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7647-2020 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) to permit a 47 unit townhouse residential development be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. Committee of the Whole Agenda September 1, 2020 Council Chambers Page 2 of 4 1103 2020-168-RZ, 13960 232 Street, 13897 and 14027 Silver Valley Road, RS-3 to R-1, R-2, RST-SV Staff report dated September 1, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7662-2020 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), RST-SV (Street Townhouse -Silver Valley) to permit a future single family subdivision and street-oriented townhouse units be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A through G, and J of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for an Intensive Residential Development Permit and a Subdivision application. 1104 2020-217-RZ, 22000 Block and 22631119 Avenue and Portion of 22558 McIntosh Avenue, Temporary Use Permit Staff report dated September 1, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7664-2020 to allow a Temporary Use Permit for a public gravel parking lot for approximately 128 vehicles for a period of 3 years be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1105 2019-394-RZ, 20857 Golf Lane, RS-1 to R-1 Staff report dated September 1, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7611-2020 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) to permit a future subdivision of approximately 6 single family lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1106 2018-498-RZ, 21640 124 Avenue, RS-1 to RT-2 Staff report dated September 1, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7533-2019 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-2 (Ground Oriented Residential Infill) to permit 3 dwelling units be given third reading. 1107 2017-489-DVP, 2017-489-DP, 11903 and 11917 Burnett Street Staff report dated September 1, 2020 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-489-DVP to reduce front, rear and sideyard setbacks, to increase maximum building storeys and height and to reduce the minimum visitor parking spaces and be authorized to sign and seal 2017-489-DP to permit construction of a five storey residential building with 54 apartment units. 1108 2020-251-DVP, 24592 105AAvenue Staff report dated September 1, 2020 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2020-251-DVP to reduce a rear yard setback to have the house oriented towards 105A Avenue rather than 245B Street. Committee of the Whole Agenda September 1, 2020 Council Chambers Page 3 of 4 5. ENGINEERING SERVICES 1131 Award of Contract, Municipal Replacement Combination Tandem Axle Sander Truck with Underbody Plow Staff report dated September 1, 2020 recommending that the contract for the purchase of one Combination Tandem Axle Sander Dump Truck with Underbody Plow be awarded to Harbour International Trucks Ltd. and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 6. CORPORATE SERVICES 7. PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURE 1171 Golden Ears Winter Club Operating Agreement Staff report dated September 1, 2020 recommending that the City of Maple Ridge enter into a new operating agreement with Golden Ears Winter Club (GEWC) for a three year period ending on August 31, 2023 and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the operating agreement. 1172 Metro Vancouver Greenways Plan Staff report dated September 15, 2020 recommending that the updates to the Metro Vancouver Regional Greenways Plan on the detailed greenways route plan be provided to Metro Vancouver Parks for consideration. 8. ADMINISTRATION 9. ADJOURNMENT 10. COMMUNITY FORUM Committee of the Whole Agenda September 1, 2020 Council Chambers Page 4 of 4 COMMUNllY FORUM The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to speak with Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing bylaws that have not yet reached conclusion. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the individual members of Council. The total time for this Forum is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a response will be given. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings and delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca APPROVED BY:-------DATE: ----------PREPARED BY:-------DATE: ----------CHECKED BY:--------DATE: __________ _ City of Maple Ridge COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MINUTES July 21, 2020 The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting held on July 21, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. hosted in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business. PRESENT Elected Officials Mayor M. Morden Councillor J. Dueck Councillor K. Duncan Councillor C. Meadus Councillor G. Robson Councillor R. Svendsen Councillor A. Yousef Appointed Staff A. Horsman, Chief Administrative Officer D. Boag, General Manager Parks, Recreation & Culture C. Carter, General Manager Planning & Development Services C. Crabtree, Acting General Manager Corporate Services S. Nichols, Deputy Corporate Officer D. Pollock, General Manager Engineering Services T. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer Other Staff as Required M. Baski, Planner 2 Y. Chui, Recreation Manager Arts & Community Connections W. Cooper, Planner 1 C. Goddard, Director of Planning A. Grochowich, Planner 2 M. McMullen, Manager of Development and Environmental Services A. Rieu, Planner 1 M. Vogel, Computer Support Specialist Note: These Minutes are posted on the City website at mapleridge.ca/AgendaCenter/ Video of the meeting is posted at media.mapleridge.ca/Mediasite/Showcase Note: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Council members participated electronically. The Mayor chaired the meeting from Council Chambers. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 2.1 Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting of July 7, 2020 It was moved and seconded That the minutes of the July 7, 2020 Committee of the Whole Meeting be adopted. CARRIED 2.1 Committee of the Whole Minutes July 21, 2020 Page 2 of 9 3. DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS 3.1 Public Art Steering Committee ("PASC") Annual Update • Susan Hayes, Chair The Recreation Manager Arts & Community Connections introduced Susan Hayes, Chair of the Public Art Steering Committee who provided a detailed annual report presentation. 4. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 2017-231-RZ, Supportive Recovery Housing Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7651-2020 to regulate supportive recovery homes be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. A. Grochowich, Planner, provided a summary presentation and staff answered Council questions. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "First and Second Reading, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7651-2020, Supportive Recovery Housing" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED Councillor Duncan -OPPOSED 1102 2019-245-RZ, 22780 Dewdney Trunk Road, CS-1 to C-3 Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7573-2019 to rezone from CS-1 (Service Commercial) to C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) to permit the construction of a six-storey, mixed-use building with 30 apartment units be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D, and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. The Manager of Development and Environmental Services provided a summary presentation and staff answered Council questions. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "First Reading, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7573-2019" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED Committee of the Whole Minutes July 21, 2020 Page 3 of 9 1103 2020-051-RZ, 11980 Glenhurst Street, RS-3 to R-1 Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7658-2020 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) to permit a subdivision of two lots of approximately 534 m2 each in area be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule B of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. The Manager of Development and Environmental Services provided a summary presentation and staff answered Council questions. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "First Reading, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7658-2020, 11980 Glenhurst Street" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED 1104 2019-081-RZ, 21358 and 21366 Dewdney Trunk Road, RS-1 and RS-1b to RM-2 Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7657-2020 to allow an increase in maximum permitted height for an apartment building from four to five storeys be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7540-2019 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) and RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential District) to permit construction of a five-storey, 54 unit, purpose-built rental apartment building be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. A. Rieu, Planner, advised that the applicant was available for questions. He provided a summary presentation and staff answered Council questions. Note: Councillor Yousef left the meeting at 2:44 p.m. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "First Reading and Second Reading, Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7657-2020; and Second Reading, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7540-2019, 21358 and 21366 Dewdney Trunk Road" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED Councillor Robson -OPPOSED Note: Councillor Yousef rejoined the meeting at 2:49 p.m. Committee of the Whole Minutes July 21, 2020 Page 4 of 9 1105 2019-425-RZ, 25057, 25123 and 25171112 Avenue, RS-3 to R-1, R-2 and R-3 Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7605-2020 to re-designate land use to single family and to re-designate portions of the property to Conservation be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7606-2020 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District) and R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) to permit a subdivision of approximately 84 lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. M. Baski, Planner, provided a summary presentation and staff answered Council questions. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "First and Second Reading, Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7605-2020; Second Reading, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7606-2020, 25057, 25123, and 25171 112 Avenue" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED Councillor Duncan -OPPOSED 1106 2020-117-RZ, 11903 and 11917 Burnett Street, Temporary Use Permit Area Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7659-2020 to designate the subject properties as a Temporary Use Permit Area to allow for a sales centre for a future apartment site be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule H of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. The Manager of Community Planning and Environmental Services provided a summary presentation and staff answered Council questions. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "First Reading, Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7659-2020, 11903 and 11917 Burnett Street" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED Committee of the Whole Minutes July 21, 2020 Page 5 of 9 1107 2018-394-RZ, Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 to regulate zoning in the City of Maple Ridge be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. The Director of Planning provided a summary presentation and staff answered Council questions. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "Second Reading, Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED Note: The Mayor left the meeting at 3:16 p.m. He rejoined the meeting at 3:20 p.m. 1108 2017-117-DVP and 2017-117-DP, 11831, 11839 and 11865 232 Street Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-117-DVP to vary front yard setbacks, rear line setbacks and reduce north and south interior side lot setbacks and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-117-DP to allow construction of a 46 unit residential townhouse development. W. Cooper, Planner, provided a summary presentation and staff answered Council questions. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "Development Variance Permit and Development Permit, 11831, 11839 and 11866 232 Street" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED 1109 2017-390-DVP and 2017-390-DP, 23084 and 23100 Lougheed Highway Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-390-DVP to reduce minimum building setbacks for specified buildings, vary the requirements for parking, increase maximum height of specified buildings, and reduce view arc requirements from living room windows for specified units and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-390-DP to permit construction of 30 townhouse units. The staff presentation was not provided at the request of Council. Committee of the Whole Minutes July 21, 2020 Page 6 of 9 It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "Development Variance Permit, Development Permit, 23084 and 23100 Lougheed Highway" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED 1110 2020-198-DVP, 12182 and 12184 228 Street Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2020-198-DVP to waive the requirement to provide underground utilities and allow servicing by overhead utility poles. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "Development Variance Permit, 12182 and 12184 228 Street" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED 5. ENGINEERING SERVICES 1131 Award of Contract RFP-EN20-30: Engineering Consulting Services for Roadway Data Collection and Pavement Management System Reporting Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that Contract RFP-EN20-30: Engineering Consulting Services for Roadway Data Collection and Pavement Management System Reporting be awarded to Tetra Tech Canada Inc., that a contingency for unanticipated additional works be approved and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "Award of Contract RFP-EN20-30: Engineering Consulting Services for Roadway Data Collection and Pavement Management System Reporting" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED 1132 Award of Contract ITT-EN20-33: Culvert Replacements on 132 Avenue Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that Contract ITT-EN20-33: Culvert Replacements on 132 Avenue be awarded to RTR Terra Contracting Ltd., that a contingency to address potential variations in field conditions be approved and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. Committee of the Whole Minutes July 21, 2020 Page 7 of 9 It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "Award of Contract ITT-EN20-33: Culvert Replacements on 132 Avenue" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED 1133 Award of Contract ITT-EN20-34: Culvert Replacement 100 m east of 28269 104Avenue Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that Contract ITT-EN-32: Culvert Replacement on 104 Avenue, 100m east of 28269 be awarded to Mission Contractors Ltd., that a contingency to address potential variations in field conditions be approved and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "Award of Contract ITT-EN20-34: 100m east of 28269 104 Avenue" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED 1134 Renewal of Contract: Hydrovac Services Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that a one year renewal agreement for hydrovac services be awarded to Badger Daylighting Limited Partnership and McRae's Environmental Services Ltd. and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the agreements. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "Contract Renewal: Hydrovac Services" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED 6. CORPORATE SERVICES 1151 2019 Annual Report and 2019 Statement of Financial Information Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that the 2019 Annual Report be received and that the 2019 Statement of Financial Information be approved. Committee of the Whole Minutes July 21, 2020 Page 8 of 9 It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "2019 Annual Report and 2019 Statement of Financial Information" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED 1152 2020 Property Tax Sale Deferral Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that 2020 Property Tax Sale Deferral Bylaw No. 7660-2020 to defer the 2020 property tax sale be given first, second and third readings and be adopted. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "2020 Property Tax Sale Deferral" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED 7. PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURE 1171 Award of Contract-Ridge Canoe and Kayak Club ("RCKC") Docks and Floating Boathouse Platform Construction Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that Contract RFP-PL20-01: RCKC Docks and Floating Boathouse Platform Construction be awarded to Blue Water Systems Ltd., that a contingency be authorized and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "RCKC Docks and Floating Boathouse Platform Construction -Award of Contract" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED 1172 Award of Contract -Albion Community Centre Construction Phase Two Staff report dated July 21, 2020 recommending that the contract for the Albion Community Centre Construction Phase Two be awarded to Double V Construction Ltd., that a contingency be authorized, that the Financial Plan Bylaw be amended to include additional funds from Accumulated Surplus and from the Parks & Recreation Improvements Reserve, and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. Committee of the Whole Minutes July 21, 2020 Page 9 of 9 It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated July 21, 2020 titled "Albion Community Centre Construction Phase Two -Award of Contract" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of July 28, 2020. CARRIED 8. ADMINISTRATION -Nil 9. ADJOURNMENT -3:48 p.m. Mayor M. Morden, Chair Presiding Member of the Committee City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: September 1, 2020 FILE NO: 2018-182-RZ FROM: SUBJECT: Chief Administrative Officer First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7562-2019; 11040 Cameron Court EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING: C o W An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 11040 Cameron Court, from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-id (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential). The applicant intends to apply the Density Bonus option within the RS-id (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential) zone, which is specific to the Albion Area, to enable the subdivision of approximately six (6) single family lots of not less than 557 m2 in area each. A density bonus contribution of $3,100 per lot less than 2,000 m2, or approximately $18,600 is payable. As per Council Policy 6.31, a Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) of $5,100 per single family lot created is also applicable to the subject property. The estimated CAC cost will be $30,600 for six (6) lots. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7562-2019 be given first reading; and 2. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D, E, and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: 2018-182-RZ Don Bowins Lot 34 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 66748 Low Density Residential Single-Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) RS-id (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential) 1101 Page 1 of 6 Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Low Density Residential and Conservation Regional Park RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Park Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Low Density Residential Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Low Density Residential Suburban Single Family Residential Urban Single Family Residential 0.406 ha (1.0 acre) Cameron Court Urban Standard The subject property, located at 11040 Cameron Court, is approximately 0.406 ha (1.0 acre) in size (See Appendix A). The site is relatively flat with a slight incline to the north. The vegetation is mainly grass cover with trees boarding the southwest corner and the east property line. The subject property is bordered by single family dwellings to the north, east and west. Located to the south of the subject property is Metro Vancouver's Kanaka Creek Regional Park. c) Project Description The applicant has applied to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-id (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential) with a Density Bonus in accordance with the Albion Area Plan to permit the subdivision of six (6) single-family lots not less than 557 m2 in size. Access to these lots will be provided from Cameron Court. At this time, the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and further reports will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. 2018-182-RZ Page 2 of 6 d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is located within the Albion Area Plan and is currently designated Low Density Residential. No changes to the OCP designations are required to allow the proposed RS-id (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential) zoning. This application is in compliance with the following Albion Area Plan Community Amenity Program policies: 10 -4 The city-wide Community Amenity Program established in Section 2.1.2 Compact and Unique Community will apply to the Albion Area Plan. A Density Bonus Framework will also be permitted on lands designated Low Density Residential, Low-Medium Density Residential and Medium Density Residential in the Albion Area Plan. 10 -5 Where the density bonus option is utilized in a single-family subdivision, the density bonus framework provisions established in the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw will apply to all lots that exceed the base density permitted in the zone, in addition to the city-wide Community Amenity Program established in Official Community Plan Section 2.1.2 Compact and Unique Community. 10 -8 A Density bonus will only be permitted on those lands that are located entirely within the boundaries of the Albion Area Plan and Urban Area Boundary. The application is also in compliance with the Zoning Bylaw that permits a Density Bonus option in RS-id zoned properties located within the Albion Area Plan. The applicant intends to apply the Density Bonus option to this project, as discussed below. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property located at 11040 Cameron Court from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-id (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential), with a Density Bonus, to permit the future subdivision of six (6) single-family lots. The Density Bonus associated with the Albion Area Plan Community Amenity Program is detailed in the Zoning Bylaw, which will permit the following: For the RS-1d One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential zone, the base density is a minimum net lot area of 2,000 m2, minimum lot width of 30 m, and minimum lot depth of 40 m. A Density Bonus is an option in the RS-1d zone and shall be applied as follows: 2018-182-RZ a. An Amenity Contribution of $3,100 per lot will be required in any subdivision containing one or more lots with an area of less than 2,000 m2, payable when the Approving Officer approves the subdivision. b. The maximum density permitted through the Density Bonus option is: i. minimum net lot area of 557 m2; ii. minimum lot width of 15.0 m; iii. minimum lot depth of 27 m. Page 3 of 6 c. Zoning requirements consistent with the RS-1b One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential zone will apply and supersede the zoning requirements for the RS-1d zone. Therefore, the Density Bonus option will permit the applicant to reduce the single-family lot size from the RS-id (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential) zone's base density of 2,000 m2 to the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone's minimum lot size of 557 m2• The proposed development consists of approximately six (6) lots with the 557 m2 size applicable to the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential) (see Appendix D), with the Density Bonus contribution for this application is approximately $18,600. The final number of lots and Density Bonus will be determined prior to second reading. It should be noted that, as per Council Policy 6.31, a Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) of $5,100 per single family lot created is also applicable to the subject property. The estimated CAC will be $30,600, and will also be confirmed prior to second reading. No variances have been requested at the current time. Any variations from the requirements of the Density Bonus zone of RS-ib (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) for lots less than 2,000 m2, or from the requirements of the RS-id (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential) zone for lots greater than 2,000 m2, will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the OCP, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for: • All areas designated Conservation on Schedule "B" or all areas within 50 metres of an area designated Conservation on Schedule "B", or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver Valley Area Plan; • All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 %; • All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural Features Schedule "C" to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions. Advisory Design Panel: A Form and Character Development Permit is not required because this is a single family project, therefore this application does not need to be reviewed by the by the Advisory Design Panel. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application because more than 5 dwelling units are being proposed. Prior to second reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. 2018-182-RZ Page 4 of 6 e) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department; f) School District; and g) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing and site access requirements have not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. The subject property has been identified as a location in which to facilitate a sanitary sewer pump station along 110th Avenue. A sanitary sewer pump station is required at the southern end of the site to facilitate development along 110th Avenue. Without a pump station, properties along 110th Avenue will not able to be serviced by sanitary sewer which would prohibit the completion of the other existing rezoning applications along 110th Avenue. The City's operation centre has provided comments on the location of the proposed sanitary sewer pump station. The diagram below provides a draft concept of the land required to facilitate a sanitary sewer pump station. Staff is recommending that this land be dedicated to the City as soon as possible to allow the constru.ction of the pump station as early as possible. The dedication of this section of land does not require the property to be rezoned. Section 401 of Zoning Bylaw 3510-1985 allows a Public Service use in all zones; "Public Service" allows municipal sewer service. Section 406 of Zoning Bylaw 3510-1985 allows dedication of a portion of a lot as road. The land that has been identified to facilitate a pump station can be dedicated to the City as road independently from the rezoning of the land. f) Early and Ongoing Consultation: In respect of Section 4 75 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an OCP amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. g) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); 2. A Multi-Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D); 2018-182-RZ Page 5 of 6 3. A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); 4. A Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G); and 5. A Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. It is, therefore, recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the Approving Officer. "Original signed by Wendy Cooper" Prepared by: Wendy Cooper, MSc, MCIP, RPP Planner 1 "Original signed by Mark McMullen" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Al Horsman" Concurrence: Al Horsman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7562-2019 Appendix D -Proposed Site Plan 2018-182-RZ Page 6 of 6 N Scale: 1 :2,500 ----~ ~~ Legend -stream -· Ditch Centreline -Edge of River -- --Edge of Marsh -• Indefinite Creek -River Centreline -Lake or Reservoir ~,:· ::] Marsh -River ~ Active Applications (RZ/SD/DPNP) APPENDIX A 11040 CAMERON COURT PIO: 002-140-896 PLANNING DEPARTMENT -==--~ .... ··~···· FILE: 2018-182-RZ DATE: Jul 30, 2020 mapleridge.ca BY: PC Scale: 1 :2,500 APPENDIX 8 11040 CAMERON COURT PIO: 002-140-896 FILE: 2018-182-RZ DATE: Jul 30, 2020 BY:PC ,-' ' t_· ! [: I l-r I --f I I CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7562-2019 APPENDIXC A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7562-2019." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 34 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 667 48 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1802 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RS-1d (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of READ a second time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,20 ,2020 ,20 , 20 , 20 CORPORATE OFFICER i~-.•. a.. u cc I EPP 94570 RW66747 / / .,........... P7408 8 5 4 3 P 66748 32 33 0, " ;;; <o ., "' "' "' ... ~ ... "' "' 110AVE. <o ., "' ., " "' 0 <') ... ... ... "' ... "' "' 41 4 P 70647 P 62092 P 7759 2 42 Rem 3 P 70647 / / P 61001 Rem 1 0 <o ~ 11045 P 66748 1--' tl'.'. 34 (.) z 0 tl'.'. w ::; <( (.) 11040 11011 --:..-~'°= -------,__-T re • ---P 55 35 26 27 P 13199 7 4 P 80959 P 59802 I ! ! I ! I ! ---1-+ i i I I I I i I f1 I I: I [-I I I i 1 1J I 1 l 1:1 I i P 62092 L..__ __ __,_ ___ ____JL.___ ___ -L...J.... _ _..c_. _________________ L...._ _______ __J -+ MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia 7562-2019 1802 RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) RS-id (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential) ~ N SCALE 1 :2,500 I l I I r I I I Ir r L 18 ...... 19 '· """' h,20 """' 1- 21 a: SS7m' 0 z Q w ::;; <I: () 4 .,_ RE 2.134 t,a 11011 5 """' 16 55711'1' ........ 41.48 6 saom: ----41.•0 ~ 5 0.406 ho 580m' 34 ~ 4 580m' 41.48 ~ 3 580m' ---41 -~ ~ 2 580m' ~1<:,-,-,:.-..,\-·: 'K> ', 0 707 ha 4 \·:;. 60om:: 2t 0 ~ -"J?.:> ••• ,~,, 752m:: \ 1 ,1 3 '· .. :! ... ',, ':, \ _ .:!~m-~:>·),;-----~:;,'t~. ~, --------,t,,___ 1 244J5 \ -------; I , ~ I~ 55~m' :~:~~:,,.___ I/ --'~--,81--------~~;---'") j I < 589m' •/ o/ IIQL.Q ~ ---</ ..-';'.: "·" a _:~-".'--------~'1, ,/ ,of od ;J .. ---- 24481 27 0.507 ho 27 G.V.R.D. PARK P 55335 7 0.510 ho P 13199 5 6 2 2 "'""' o,Q """"'' ~-STORMm.u! S.I.NITAAYSE'l,(R "' D.K. BOW INS & ASSOCIATES INC. ll.~'5orn" 'IM ~~ U.C.Ml'DRO 8955 EM!RY STREET. MI SSION. B.C. ~lD.U'H()H[ V4S 1A6 TEL:604-826-4399 , ~ No [ Dot, I Re~slon u=""" I BY I EMAIL: dbowrns@!shaw .ca WAmtORGASYM.~ 1h11 •o•loo Md O<ol;n II lllo pn,s,orl~ ol 0.1(. IID'IIINS .I: ASSOCIAID Irle. .....t cannot 1>o u-. ,.,..,..i or rtllfflled "11hoo.a1111, ••111., ,_..,, ol oold _.,i,. '1,1 :,.;i;i:1:·1,; :--.--·-----,--------,-,-.-.....-----------·- • P 59802 ~ .!M. 5 .658 ho DITCH +::;-/ / IOIIA l',1',I AJD SEAL ~::~ fDOCQfGltA',O, --OESICNED DKB .1.P~ SI.OI'[ -,,,-- Lrn TRIGIIT .L Sl!M 0 CHECKED ::P,1.\IEMENI APPROVED "'" = G FlELOBOOK Slllll'EY ~0141WDff SAN. INSPECTI.OII ow.eot 0-,:, SC.US HORZ. 1:500 $1RE£TUG111 -c::::;:i VERT. - SANITARY '"" J. l[ G) WAlERMAIN l,!IN. 40mm ASPHfJ.TIC CONCll[T£$l!llrAC( COURSE MIH. 40mm ASPHIJ.ffC CONCRElr8"5£ COURSC MlJRE DEDICATION ~IN. 11XlrM, Of 10,,,.,, t,IINUS c:IIUS!i atA'<U B"5( 10 95':Sl~llAADPl!OCTOl'I IIIN.JOOrnnlPITRUN5UB8ASE10illlC$TAHDAIIO/llt0ClOII 5UB&II.\OETOMXS1AtlDARDPl!OCTOR 1 JO AVENUE URBAN !LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STRE ET t:100 CITY OF MA PLE RIDGE ENGINEERING DEPARlMENT l SUBDIVISION PLAN CAI ER ON CR T/24495 110 AVENU E ·-..,--;--1;rc 1!f'.'!n'1J ·'.7;1~~1: ·~~:sil~f~·~~~--;m:1:1 ~i:i1ij:[:"'77T' )> '"C '"C m z 0 >< 0 !~ I ' :i':,_'_1·11 '! I I "ml i.,ijl·1. :<1lj J)/'.!!1 .,,1,,·_.·_1 1·..i 1Ji;f 'J 1··------, I' [~·-· mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: September 1, 2020 FILE NO: 2020-066-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C o W SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7647-2020 11886, 11892 and 11902 232 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject properties, located at 11886, 11892 and 11902 232 Street, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District), to permit a 47 unit townhouse residential development. To proceed further with this application additional information is required, as outlined below. Pursuant to Council policy, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution Program at a rate of $4,100.00 per townhouse dwelling unit, for an estimated amount of $192,700.00. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7647-2020 be given first reading; and 2. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: 2020-066-RZ Brandon Nick Lot 37 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 24454; Lot 38 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 24454; Parcel "A" (Reference Plan 15155) Lot 2 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 8165 Urban Residential Urban Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) 1102 Page 1 of 5 f Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Multi-Family Residential Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential South: Use: Multi-Family Residential _____________ ,Zone· RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) ----------------+-'--c Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential West:· Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential 0.87 ha (2.1 acres) Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: 232 Street Servicing requirement: Urban Standard b) Site Characteristics: The three subject properties, located at 11886, 11892 and 11902 232 Street (see Appendices A and B), are relatively flat and have some trees located around the perimeter of the properties. One significant tree along 232 Street is proposed to be retained, as well as trees around the perimeter of the properties that straddle property lines. The three subject properties currently have single family houses located on them, which will require removal as part of rezoning conditions. Consolidation of the subject properties will also be a condition of rezoning. c) Project Description: The application proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) to permit the construction of a three-storey townhouse development, with approximately 47 units, and a proposed floor area of 6,316 m2 (67,987 ft2). The current application is proposing a floor space ratio (FSR) of 0.75, which exceeds the maximum allowable density by approximately 1,264 m2 (13,606 ft2). Based on density bonus regulations, whereby bonus floor space can be achieved in exchange for the provision of $344.46 per m2 ($32 per ft2), the proposed additional density for the townhouse use would yield approximately $435,311.00. The applicant is also proposing a mix of double car garages (36 units) and tandem garages (11 units), which is generally in keeping with the 70 percent double garage, 30 percent tandem parking ratio that has been supported in the past. Staff will be providing an update on the Tandem Parking discussion in the fall of 2020. At this time, the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will 2020-066-RZ Page 2 of 5 I T f I l r --""'~~i'E'i'-;;-::;::-:-----:E;... --.. _ :z_-need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and further reports will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: O.fficial Communi:ty Plan· The subject property is located within the Urban Area Boundary (UAB) and is currently designated Urban Residential. No Official Community Plan amendment is required to support the proposed RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) zoning. The development of the property is subject to the Major Corridor infill policies of the OCP. These policies require that development be compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood, with particular attention given to site design setbacks and lot configuration with the existing pattern of development in the area. The proposed rezoning to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) is in conformance with the Urban Residential designation and Major Corridor infill policies. It is noted that one of the underlying principles in the OCP is to encourage growth within the UAB and to accommodate growth through infill by promoting a mix of housing types and tenures (Policy 3-1). The Major Corridor Residential Infill and Compatibility Criteria all support a change in the unit type, and specifically cite that townhouse development is both compatible and desirable in the City (Policies 3-19 and 3-20). Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) to permit the development of 47 townhouse units (see Appendix C). The applicant is proposing variances to reduce the front, rear and side lot line setbacks from 7.5 m (25 ft.) to 3.5 m (11.5 ft.), at the shortest distance (see Appendix D). These variances and any further variances arising from subsequent design work will require a Development Variance Permit Application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. Advisory Design Panel: A Multi-Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second reading. 2020-066-RZ Page 3 of 5 . [- Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading, the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. e) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department; f) School District; and g) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing and site access requirements have not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); 2. A Multi-Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D); and 3. A Development Variance Permit Application (Schedule E). The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. 2020-066-RZ Page 4 of 5 l i i I l -+ I ' CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. "Original signed by Adam Rieu" Prepared by: Adam Rieu Planner "Original signed by Chuck Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Al Horsman" Concurrence: Al Horsman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7647-2020 Appendix D -Proposed Site Plan 2020-066-RZ Page 5 of 5 945 -1 39 -911 -903 '--895 ~ 823 '--'819 '--811 -803 -1960 11950 '1944 r.-.... I "' . "' 11914 11910 1892 11882 b1866 ti <n b1850 z ~ fh ,I b1836 ti I 111824 I I b1818 b1810 11804 SLAGER AVE. ---11983 11971 11961 11953 11943 11929 11903 11885 11875 118AVE. p! l-------~------~~-1-1~ "'"' Legend -stream ---Ditch Centreline - -Indefinite Creek I ' 12036 2030 I 12010 / 11991 11998 11987 \;; APPENDIX A -12021 DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. 2004 I!) b<~ b<" = ' w ~ 17--11915---~ 11983 bl ~ 'c !-jl'Wl--1---" 11963 I i---------11953; -/ I /,1952 ~--11~94=9-I /1-----1 ,___ _ __,__ __ _ 11971 I 11 ' 1---------1: 11---11961 l;; 1 11! 11950 SUBJECT PROPERTIES ~ I 11948 11936 11943 ~ 111! i ~ 119 ,-.: I u, I ~ I I I I 11902 11892 11870 11923 11909 11895 11885 ji;; --~11=85=1'"" ~ (l'. 0 I 11857 I 11851 11841 11837 11825 11918 11935 11917 I 11908 11915 11898 11907 I Im ' h1i"ii18i88'88-r------{ _____ j I 11897 I Iii I--~ 118 11870 11881 1=> I~ ~----11-8-67---< cJ 11860 11853 11850 118 i~ 11841 11844 11838 11831 I I -11832 11834 I '---------------1~----j• I . 118 11821 I 1-I I 11822 I ' 11812118 ; .. _ I I !.-1------1 \ 11819 11820 11805 11808 ~-------11 •, 1181 11817 I I ~ I ~ 118 AVE. 11795 11789 11886/92, 11902 232 STREET PID'S: 002-539-292, 009-354-123 & 011-294-914 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1~1•• f N m Active Applications (RZ/SD/DPNP) FILE: 2020-066-RZ DATE: May 15, 2020 mapleridge.ca Scale: 1 :2,500 BY:PC ,--[~ -=-Ft=-N Scale: 1 :2,500 APPENDIX 8 11886/92, 11902 232 STREET PID'S: 002-539-292, 009-354-123 & 011-294-914 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~,, •.• FILE: 2020-066-RZ DATE: May 15, 2020 mapleridge.ca BY:PC I i I f I I I I : ! l I. I l f: ~-~--CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7647-2020 APPENDIXC A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7647-2020." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 37 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 24454 Lot 38 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 24454 Parcel "A" (Reference Plan 15155) Lot 2 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminter District Plan 8165 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1839 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of READ a second ti me the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,20 , 20 , 20 ,20 ,20 CORPORATE OFFICER ~ , __ 0, "' '-.., '-'-0 ~ & ~ 0, ~ :!: "' ~ "' ~ ,__ 11. "' a.. "' "' "' :::i :::i :::i :::i :::i :::i :::i ~ ~ .., :::i Q:'. "' P 87647 RP 65777 RW 87445 RW 87447 DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. P 87446 RP 88239 /RP 86777 RP 87279 LMP81 -a; "' 0 "' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ,-; "' -o, ., 0 "' ~ ~ 0, (f) ;;; LMP 43782 '1: ~ ~ 2 ,__ :::i ; ; ('f) <'> <'> "' :::i 21:l :::i :::i ~Re ~Re a.. Rem"' "'"' I'--"' 7593 :a; 3 .., "' G "' H ...J 2 A ,-"' LMP43743 :::i :::i 43 a. RW 671!} -'-P1 841 ,-; Re (f) 12 P86778 (f) 3 "' 4 11957 z 0 11983 UJ 1960 ~ LMP 7254 11971 :,: a. UJ 3: A B .... LMP1 (f) Q:'. 11961 LMR--1382 -1-1-951 11950 p 4098 co 7 LMS 1445 5 10 9 8 Ol 11945 11944 0 11953 "' ~ '-;;:: 6 11943 :!: '-'-11950 6 1939 :::i :::i :::i :::i SLAGER AVE. ~ ; \f ... ; ~ ~~ 7 ~ <'> :::i :::i :::i 5 "' 11929 a. RP 15155 8 A 11911 11914 2 3 4 47 0 P1 098 11903 11902 11903 co 11910 Ol 11885 11892 24454 37 P70911 38 46 a. 11895 1892 2 I I 11 11875 11885 11882 _ L.MP .1Z2U I I --. -J 12 <'l 11875 11866 'Sf° ,-; "' ,-; 13;;:: Ol "' (f) Ol .., 11865 11850 l[) "' "' N 11865 LMP17226 z UJ :,: 14 a. 11870 a. S83' of 1 11835 UJ 11836 .... "' 11839 15 11823 11824 P 10448 35 11834 P24972 11831 16 A ltJ~ 11819 11818 BC 140 8 11822 2 3 4 5 6 ~~ 49 17 [m 11811 <D ~ 0, B a. P36329 1810 0 11821 I~ :::i '-<'> 11812/18 1t-~ "' :::i 18 m~ :::i 11804 11803 11804 I :::i _Rl!Y.7§§.8L MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: 7647-2020 1839 RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) 11991 C 11987 D 11975 A Ol 2 Ol I'--<D 0.---1 11949 30 P22024 A P32010 11923 11909 27 11895 ~26 0 11885 0.25 ,-; "' 11867 UJ z 0: 24 0 :,: .... 11857 ~ 23 :,: 11851 22 11841 21 N 11837 1'l 20 N 11825 19 11819 18 11805 17 To: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia LMP10775 ~ .., 1 12010 :::i \_ LMP 575 DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. LMP 120 RP 87281 ~M 11998 "'"' "' Rem 0 -"' ... ,-~ .., .., .., 1 .., <'> :::i 2 :::i <'> ,-; 1 "' ~ :::i Eo (f) &~ UJ P80 54 Rem z 0 11983 0: a. 17 ~2 0 :,: _J:P Jl.09 5 .... I ~ P19998 1611971 :,: ~ 15 J.961 ->'--"' 1 N .... 3 "' 11943 0: :::, 11948 a. 14 :,: z 11936 a. w 4 .., 11 4 (.') 13 N 11935 11918 I,_ bi 11 [§5N 11917 5 12 11908 [a.. 11 6 I 6 11915 11 11898 11 7 ~ 11907 10 11888 ~ 11 11897 8 a. 7 9 ,-; &'j "' 11870 .... 11 "' 9 co 11881 0: ,-:::, a. 8 :,: z UJ 11 47 11867 15 7 11860 *PP096 l[) 11 co 11853 46 ~ 11850 6 11 45 11841 5 11844 11838 11 11831 13 4 11832 11 11821 14 N Rem (') 3 N 11820 44 15 11817 P26162 a. 2 11808 11; 16 <'> :::i :::i 118 AVE. 6 N SCALE 1:2,500 ' ' r r t I : l i ~ : . r ~ ,_. 5 4 ,te Retoining Wo ll r, ','\ \ 11 I ','le> 0· 0':o'\ --+--' Q) Q) '- ,:, --+--' <o Ul'\<:> ~· ~~ ~ 0:.., C C N n N '\'t, o," 0 o,'o .;-- ·0 ~- ')" ,8;,· C " it "-MH i5 'i" ~-V ~ w'V ~- V ; 0 (L i5 V o, -0 w '\'b 0 ,;:,'t> ~- ~ I) ""<:j Wood Re l aininq Woll '\" ~':o· ,,-, ~- r--_____________________ P:.....;...;rO::;..R.2._SJtdw6mewsj _d~.ntial Develo_pment 1'1902, 11886 AND 11892 23.2ND STREET, MAPLE RIDGE , B.C. Augu&I 06, 2020 ATELIER PACIFIC ARCHITECTURE tNC . Oak 49 DEVELOPMENTS ~-------- V I 10 :>, {:;., <> "" 27 6 ~ PROJEC T 2 5 NORTH LEGEND: CDi ~l_g ::~-='c:!·~-H ,, ... Pr~-·- DPO.O SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/16""' 1'-O" . ·C· ' .... ---~ TrMhti..,,.,,G lX•Tognu,nt,or g,;;;.::t,::- S-X)(.Slr-.d<lJng ho.Vlnllen ::":'.:.."!'::°.!.""' )> "'U "'U m z 0 >< 0 I ,j 'i '. i ,, I :;::·1· rir!-'"'.T!i1 ;,pp City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: September 1, 2020 FILE NO: 2020-168-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C o W SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7662-2020; 13960 232 Street, 13897 and 14027 Silver Valley Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject properties, located at 13960 232 Street, 13897 and 14027 Silver Valley Road, from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), R~T-SV (Street Townhouse-Silver Valley), to permit a future single family subdivision and street-oriented townhouse units. The proposed development will require amendments to the Official Community Plan. The proposed amendments are required to achieve a balance between open space/conservation areas and the emerging development pattern in the Silver Valley area. As per Council Policy 6.31, a Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) of $5,100 per single family lot and $4,100 per townhouse dwelling unit is also applicable to the subject properties. The estimated CAC cost will be $328,000 based on the preliminary plan showing 58 single family lots and eight street-oriented townhouses. It is noted that a number of technical reports are required for this project to advance to second reading, and it is quite likely lot boundaries and yields may be reduced as a result. Since this first reading report is based on a preliminary plan, the total CAC figure will also be adjusted. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. 1103 2020-168-RZ Page 1 of 7 I I ! I --+ : and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; 2. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7662-2020 be given first reading; and 3. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A through G, and J of the Develo ment Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for an Intensive Residential Development Permit and a Subdivision application. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: 2020-168-RZ Morningstar Homes Ltd. (Addie Anderson) Lot 1 Block "C" Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 2409; Lot 15 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 26732; Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 11340) Lot 10 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 7757; Conservation, Open Space, Eco Clusters Conservation, Open Space and Eco Clusters RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), RST-SV (Street Townhouse-Silver Valley) Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Eco Cluster and Conservation Park R-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Open Space Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Eco Cluster and Conservation Single Family Residential R-2 (Urban Residential District) and R-1 (Residential District) Eco Cluster Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential and Single Family Residential 5.78 ha (14.28 acres) 232 Street and Silver Valley Road Urban Standard Page 2 of 7 -cr:: --b) Site Characteristics: The subject properties located at 13960 232 Street, 13897 and 14027 Silver Valley Road, are located in Silver Valley west of Silver Valley Road east of 232 Street, south of 141 Avenue and north of 138 Avenue (Appendix A and B). 13960 232 Street contains a single family residential structure located on the southwest corner of the property gaining access off 232 Street. The property contains a ravine that runs north to south. ~---Within this ravine is Enkon Stream with Anderson Creek branching off eastward. The property contains a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees. 14027 Silver Valley Road contains a single family residential structure that is located on the southeastern portion of the property. The property slopes westward and has a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees. The access for the property is from Silver Valley Road. 13897 Silver Valley Road contains a single family residential structure and accessory structures. The residential structure is located on the eastern portion of the property. The access for the property is from Silver Valley Road. The property slopes westward from Silver Valley Road. There is a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees on the property. c) Project Description: The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject properties from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential to R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), and RST-SV (Street Townhouse-Silver Valley) zone to facilitate a mixture of a desired 58 single family homes and eight street townhouse units. The street-oriented townhouses are proposed off 232 Street with the single family homes being located off Silver Valley Road. At this time, the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and further reports will be required prior to second reading. Elements to be reviewed by the City include: • Environmental report regarding the creeks; • Arborist report assessing significant stands of trees; • Servicing and lot grading plans; and -• Geotechnical report. Assessment of these elements is likely to impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. 2020-168-RZ Page 3 of 7 1 i C ,-,_ ' ' -,-' ' ' ,--! --~ d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is located within the Silver Valley Area Plan and is currently designated Eco Cluster, Open Space and Conservation. For the proposed development, an OCP amendment will be required to adjust the Open Space, Conservation and Eco Cluster boundaries to achieve a design for ---~the development that is in keeping with the Eco Cluster concept, which detailed in the Silver Valley ----Area Plan. An Eco-Cluster is a group of housing units, condensed within clearly defined limits, surrounded by open space and linked to other parts of the Silver Valley community by a single local road. Eco-Clusters are intended to provide development opportunities in sparsely developed or rural areas, in a cluster form which supports sensitive implementation, minimal site regrading and tree clearing, and integration of housing into a forest setting. The Eco Cluster OCP designation densities and housing types should be diversified. Eco-Clusters include multi-family units. The proposed OCP amendment does not increase the density of the proposal. The OCP amendment will facilitate an overall design that supports the Eco Cluster concept. The exact designation boundary amendments have not been determined. These boundaries will be determined once all reviews of the above noted reports/plans for the project are completed. This review will include discussions with the Environmental Section and Engineering Department with regards to the watercourses; trees and steep slopes located within the properties. The Parks Department has identified that a Sm wide trail connection will be required through the development properties. This trail will need to be incorporated in such a way as not to infringe on the environmental elements of the property. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject properties located at 13960 232 Street, 13897 and 14027 Silver Valley Road from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), RST-SV (Street Townhouse-Silver Valley), to permit a future development of approximately fifty-eight (58) single family lots and approximately eight (8) street townhouse units. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required for the street townhouses to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring existing and fut1,.1re land uses. Pursuant to Section 8.8 of the OCP, an Intensive Residential Development Permit application is required for the R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), to ensure the current proposal provides emphasis on high standards in aesthetics and quality of the built environment, while protecting important qualities of the natural environment. 2020-168-RZ Page 4 of 7 I : ii I + ! ! I ! !I : I I ·'··~~-Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the OCP, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for: • All areas designated Conservation on Schedule "B" or all areas within 50 metres of an area designated Conservation on Schedule "B", or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver Valley Area Plan; • All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 %; • All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural Features Schedule "C" to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions. Pursuant to Section 8.12 of the OCP, a Wildfire Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity identified in wildfire risk areas. The purpose of the Wildfire Development Permit is for the protection of life and property in designated areas that could be at risk for wildland fire; and where this risk may be reasonably abated through implementation of appropriate precautionary measures. The subject property is located within the Wildfire Development Permit Area, identified on Map 1 in Section 8.12 of the Official Community Plan. Prior to second reading a Registered Professional Forester's Report will be required to determine wildfire mitigation requirements. Advisory Design Panel: A Multi-Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to Second Reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. e) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department; f) School District; g) Fisheries & Oceans Canada; h) Ministry of Environment; and i) Canada .Post. 2020-168-RZ Page 5 of 7 ~-The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department detailed for comments at this time; therefore, evaluation of servicing and site access requirements have not been undertaken. It is anticipated that this evaluation of servicing and lot grading in conjunction with the other City Departments will take place between first and second reading. f) Early and Ongoing Consultation: In respect of Section 4 75 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an OCP amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. g) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed, the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended: 1. An OCP Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B or Schedule C); 3. A Multi-Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D); 4. A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); 5. A Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); 6. A Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G); 7. A Wildfire Development Permit Application (Schedule J); 8. An Intensive Residential Development Permit Application; and 9. A Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in general compliance with the policies of the OCP; however, land-use designation and boundary adjustments are required. Justification has been provided to support the OCP amendments; therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. It is recommended that Council not require any further additional OCP consultation. 2020-168-RZ Page 6 of 7 ·;::.-~--;s. -~ The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the Approving Officer and is subject to a Servicing Agreement to be approved by the Engineering Department. "Original signed by Wendy Cooper" Prepared by: Wendy Cooper, MSc., MCIP, RPP Planner "Original signed by Mark McMullen" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Al Horsman" Concurrence: Al Horsman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Preliminary Development Plan Appendix D -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7662-2020 2020-168-RZ Page 7 of 7 APPENDIX A I /' ~~-----J_ ______ "?'" ______ --1-----'----::::_;;; __ ;;;_;-;_;--.-= .. -;-;_:.;.;-;_=_;;;;;;;_;--" / __ ,....w,ol!V;---' -==---~-----,-----, ' .-~ ~ ! I ,/' ~ \ ,/,; ... ____ .,,,, .~ --141AVE. Ii --14126 14119 • , __ __,-!,---14092 14077 N Scale: 1 :3,000 / I '/..!!.~-----------_l-J:-------'-~ ... ---v----------------·''.oo.31 13860 13856 13852 Legend -stream ---Ditch Centreline -Edge of River - -Indefinite Creek 1111 Lake or Reservoir 1111 River 13960 232 STREET, 13897, 14027 SILVER VALLEY ROAD PID'S 012-642-223, 000-615-722, 011-260-840 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ----~---··· FILE: 2020-168-RZ DATE: Jun 3, 2020 mapleridge.ca BY: PC r i ' ' -' I I [ I ~ i : ~-i i !: I Scale: 1 :2,500 APPENDIX 8 13960 232 STREET, 13897, 14027 SILVER VALLEY ROAD PID'S 012-642-223, 000-615-722, 011-260-840 PLANNING DEPARTMENT -.__:~~::s;··..:·:::.. ••·• FILE: 2020-168-RZ DATE: Jun 3, 2020 mapleridge.ca BY:PC APPENDIXC : 0 • ti • !_ ,,, .. :_ ----CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7662-2020 APPENDIX D A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7662-2020." 2. Those parcel (s) or tract (s) of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Block "C" Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 2409; Lot 15 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 26732; Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 11340) Lot 10 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 7757; and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1846 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), RST-SV (Street Townhouse-Silver Valley). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of READ a second time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,20 ,2020 ,20 ,20 , 20 CORPORATE OFFICER 309 6 20 21 ~ ~ ~ ~ KSIDE CRES. 25 >-' Cf) N "' N 13920 --1 13912 2 13906 13900 J i I P7757 Rem 10 P 26 32 14 BCP46662 BCP 46658 PARK MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: 7662-2020 1846 RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) 141 AVE. EP 16905 i 14136 14126 P 20981 ~ li! P 16208 t:! t:! N150.74' C Rem H ~ > EP 15312 14119 ~ ~ w ~ Rem H " "' 14092 ~ 140n P 20981 a. S 150' H P 20981 P 13776 19 18 17 16 P 27891 ROAD P 13776 To: ~ R-1 (Residential District!) CJ RST-SV (Street Townhouse ~ R-2(Urban Residential District) -Silver Valley 6 MAPLE RIDGE N British Columbia SCALE 1:3,500 I ~I [.~-mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer First and Second Reading MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7664-2020; September 1, 2020 2020-217-RZ cow 22000 Block and 22631119 Avenue and Portion of 22558 McIntosh Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received for a Temporary Use Permit, (formerly called a Temporary Commercial or Industrial Permit), to temporarily allow a public gravel parking lot for approximately 128 vehicles, including two (2) disabled parking spaces. The site includes a metered parking lot, mainly to serve the parking needs of commuters making use of the Haney Transit Exchange and Civic Centre facilities to the west. The subject site incudes two lots and a portion of a third lot. These are: an unaddressed lot in the 22000 block of 119 Avenue, 22631119 Avenue and a sliver of City land on the east side of 226 Street at 22558 McIntosh Avenue (see Appendices A and B). The two privately owned properties are currently under a lease agreement. This sliver of land on the east of 226 Street is part of City-owned land containing the Haney Transit Exchange. The initial lease for this public parking lot was permitted under the "Public Service" use under Zoning Bylaw 3510-1985 to provide a commuter parking facility supporting the B-Line express bus service from Maple Ridge to Coquitlam Central Station, as well as for users of City facilities in the Civic Core. A text amendment to Appendix D -Temporary Use Permits of the OCP is proposed to allow a Temporary Use Permit on the subject properties for this public parking lot for a period of three (3) years and allow community comment on the parking lot through the Public Hearing process (see Appendix C). Therefore, Council is requested to grant first and second reading simultaneously, proceed to Public Hearing and issue the Temporary Use Permit concurrently with final adoption of the OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7664-2020. This type of application is not subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC). When the privately-owned lands are subject to rezoning for development in the future, any applicable CAC in place would apply and be collected at that time. Given the strategic location and the role of supporting transit and Civic Core activities in the Town Centre, it is recommended that application 2020-217-RZ be granted first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7664-2020 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw; 1104 2020-217-RZ Page 1 of 6 2) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7664-2020 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 3) That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7664-2020 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7664-2020 be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 5) The following actions take place after third reading: i) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7664-2020 be adopted; ii) That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2020-217-CU respecting the properties located at 22000 block and 22631 119 Avenue and portion of 22558 McIntosh Avenue. DISCUSSION: 1) Background Context: Applicant: City of Maple Ridge (Darrell Denton) Legal Description: Lot A District Lot 401 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan LMP15424; Lot 2 District Lot 401 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 8695 and a portion of Lot 120 District Lot 401 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 60562 Except Plan BCP52040 OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Smmuo_dJog_Uses · APTH (Medium and High-Rise Apartment) APTH (Medium and High-Rise Apartment) RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) North: Use: Commercial and Vacant Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: 2020-217-RZ C-3 (Town Centre Commercial), CS-1 (Service Commercial) and a Temporary Use Permit for a Taxi Dispatch Facility Town Centre Commercial Mixed Use C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Town Centre Commercial Residential RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Medium and High-Rise Apartment Institutional (Haney Transit Exchange) C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Town Centre Commercial, Medium and High-Rise Apartment and Institutional Page 2 of 6 ' ' ' ' ' ~-f f f I ' ' ' i i I l r ' ' ' ' [': t ~: I-:: I l ' ' -t-i I ' I Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access Servicing: 2) Background: Vacant Temporary gravel parking lot 0.45 HA (1.1 Acres) Entrance and Exit: 119 Avenue Urban Standard The lease oftnelanafor a pu5Tic parRing lon,as 1nitlallyoeen permitted unaer"-Public~sen7ice" use which is allowed in any area of the City under Zoning Bylaw 3510-1985. The applicant proposes to amend Appendix D -Temporary Use Permits of the OCP for a Temporary Use Permit. This process allows community comment on the parking lot through the Public Hearing process, including any public comments on the design and functioning of the parking lot. Two of the subject properties, which are privately owned, are currently vacant. The third lot is a small sliver of City owned vacant land severed by 226 Street (a hooked lot) located on the east side of that street. The Local Government Act provides for a two-step approval process. Firstly, designating the subject land as a Temporary Use Permit Area for the purposes of a temporary parking lot (Off Street Parking use as a Principal Use) in Appendix D of the Official Community Plans. OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7664-2020 is the vehicle to designate the subject site as a Temporary Use Permit Area for parking purposes. Secondly, is the issuance by Council resolution of the Temporary Use Permit, including the proposed parking lot layout and any necessary conditions or security as the legislation allows. The use of the private land for temporary parking purposes is governed by a lease agreement that will run concurrently with the Temporary Use Permit. The current lease agreement is for three years with potential 1-year renewal periods. The legislation permits Council to allow land to be put to requested temporary uses for up to three (3) years, and there would be another application to extend the Temporary Use Permit by Council for up to an additional three (3) years. 3) Project Description: The proposed temporary use is for a pay parking lot with 128 parking spaces, including two (2) disabled parking spaces, mainly for commuters and Civic Centre users as shown in the figure below. 2020-217-RZ Page 3 of 6 ---1 ! I I This layout was designed by City Engineering. Vehicles will enter and exit by way of 119 Avenue. The north exit to the lane shown in the figure has been deleted for traffic safety reasons. The parking lot has already been created and the meter for parking payment installed at the southwest area of the site close to the crosswalk giving direct and convenient pedestrian access to the Haney Transit Exchange and Civic Centre. The parking lot entrance is asphalt and the parking surface is made up of from compacted, reclaimed asphalt, with the parking stalls delineated by concrete curbs. 4) Planning Analysis: ----i) Official Community Plan: The subject properties are located within the Town Centre Area Plan and are currently designated Medium and High-Rise Apartment. The existing zoning RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) is the historical residential zoning of the area. The proposed off-street parking use is not consistent with the current designation or with the desired Town Centre policies; however, a Temporary Use Permit for parking is appropriate to serve the needs of commuters and Civic Centre users. An OCP amendment is required to add the subject properties into Appendix D -Temporary Use Permits of the Official Community Plan. This will become Temporary Use Permit Area No. 9. Appendix D of the Official Community Plan states the following: 1. Lands in the City may be designated to permit temporary uses if a condition or circumstance exists that warrants the use for a short period of time but does not warrant a change of land use designation or zoning of the property. 2. Council has the authority by resolution to issue Temporary Use Permits to allow temporary uses on specific properties. Council may specify conditions for the temporary use. 3. Designated Temporary Use Permit areas will require guidelines that specify the general conditions regarding the issuance of permits, the use of the land, and the date the use is to terminate. 4. As a condition of issuing the permit, Council may require applicants or owners to remove buildings, to restore the property to a specific condition when the use ends, and to post a security bond. A permit may be issued for a period of up to three years, and may be renewed only once. 5. Council may issue Temporary Use Permits to allow: a) temporary commercial uses, i.e., temporary parking areas; b) temporary industrial uses, i.e. soil screening; and c) other temporary uses. 6. A Temporary Use Permit is issued in accordance with the provisions of Section 492 of the Local Government Act. As outlined in points 2 and 3 above, the Temporary Use Permit may have conditions and guidelines for the use to occur, as well as removal and restoration requirements once the permit terminates. These conditions and guidelines are similar to Development Permit requirements such as surface finishes, landscaping, and fencing. In this instance, no such provisions are being proposed given the existing state of the property. 2020-217-RZ Page 4 of 6 -~-l I ---t ! r ~ - Temporary Use Permits are valid for a period of up to three (3) years, and may be renewed and extended only once for up to an additional three (3) years. A Temporary Use Permit extension is granted by Council, and Council is under no obligation to approve an extension. The main difference between rezoning and a Temporary Use Permit is the duration of time that the use is permitted on the property, the removal and restoration requirements and accompanying conditions, if any. ii) Development Information Meeting: KDeve1opmenrlnfcrrmatiun Meetingis-n-ot-requiredior-thisiyp-e-ot-apptication. 5) Interdepartmental Implications: i) Engineering: Engineering does not have any requirements for this temporary use. Given that the site is zoned residential and is only temporarily being used as a parking lot, Engineering is satisfied necessary any upgrades, dedication, etc. can be obtained when future development applications are submitted to the City. ii) Parks. Recreation and Culture: If this parking lot is to become a long term use, some landscaping (low maintenance shrubs and iii) Fire Department: The Fire Department reported they had no comments or concerns with this temporary use. 6) Intergovernmental Issues: i) Local Government Act: An amendment to the OCP requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 477 of the Local Government Act. The amendment required for this application to Appendix D Temporary Use Permits is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw is required. 2020-217-RZ Page 5 of 6 r f-i-I ' ,_ r f ~: I ~-=-~--~~-~~~--....,..,..~~~~.,-,,,........----~~ T CONCLUSION: Given the strategic location and the role of supporting transit and civic core activities in the Town Centre, it is recommended that first and second reading be given to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7664-2020, and that application 2020-217-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. "Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski" Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MSC, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP Planner "Original signed by Mark McMullen" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Al Horsman" Concurrence: Al Horsman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7664-2020 2020-217-RZ Page 6 of 6 ' [ - OWN AVE. 12075 J " 12003 AJ9 12060 /62 ,-.: (/) w (.') 0 w 12038 12018 ,._ ,._ ,._ ,~ ill <o ,._ "' "' ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,. <o <o ill :g ,._ "' ~ ~ "' "' APPENDIX A O> ,._ "' ., O> g "' "' <o "' "' "' "' "' BROWN AVE. '-----J I 12057 ~ ., <o "' g :g ill g <o ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 i:2 0 ~ "' lg <o <o ~ ~ ~ ~ 12047 ~ >-(/) ,._ N N "' "' ;g --~ ~ ~ r-.. " r-.. ~. ____ , _____ _ ------=~==~ ----~ ---~~~---~~'----'--------~~ DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD ;::, L ______ j----D-E_WD_~c.,NEY 1,_ i ipa/Ha/1 5 Courthouse 11960 L--I.______________ Arts Centre 11944 LJJ .____ 11996 -<o 0 0 ,!: 0 ill ill <o "' "' ~ "' "' "' "' "' MclNTOSH AVE. '\, b ., ill ~ c "' ~ ~ ~ ,!: 0 ., <o 1o ~ ~ ~ ~ ;g ~ LANE 11980 11971 ~BJECT PROPERTIES L / 1963 11970 I/ LANE 11940/48 11947 11937 "' 11920126 ,,. r,!. O> 11931 ~ M ;g <o ;:,., ~~ !.'< "' ~ "' "'"' "'"' 119AVE. 119AVI ., ' ~ ~ 11882 11893 lf 0 ~ "' "' 11910 LANE 11890 ,-.: (/) ,-.: (/) <D Haney Place Mall t--,._ N 11876 "' N "' N N SELKIRK AVE. 11900 11862 11865 ~ ~ ., 11858 SELKIRK AVE. SELKIRK AVE. 11844 11834 D ,_ ----~ 11837 ~ 118AAVE. r-----,._ O> Sl ~ "' ~ ;;; ~ ;g 1o ~ ;)\ <o f;j "' "' "' <o <o ' ~ "'"' ~ .~ "' ~ ~ ~ ~ "'"' "' NAY LOUGHEED HWY. City.,.cpfPit1\--...'.~/_).) ! Mea:s,~~i h 11 ! c LOT 2, PLAN 8695 & 22631 119 AVENUE i 1 , r· !:i .__ __ P_1 o_·_s_: 0_1_a_-?_1_7_-4_3_a_&_o_oo_-_96_9_-_27_3_----1 .,..,t;;;;;;;:_. "-~ f-}--, :2 I 1 ~ .,.--+,-r, _y, I , ! o ., 1 ~~ff!~ [~1--: • ~~~;; ~~·~~ ~ /-l!/',1------___ m_a-_p_-1e_-_ri_c1_g_e_._c_a ___ --1 ) I /fC FILE: 2020-217-RZ Scale: 1 :2,500 -=.!'RASER R. ~ ~ DATE: Aug 12, 2020 BY: PC N PLANNING DEPARTMENT N Scale: 1 :2,500 APPENDIX 8 · LOT 2, PLAN 8695 & 22631 119 AVENUE PID'S: 018-717-438 & 000-969-273 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~·-·· FILE: 2020-217-RZ DATE: Aug 12, 2020 mapleridge.ca BY:PC I ! I I I r i : -::.~~.r,--~-~~~ -~ CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7664-2020 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan APPENDIXC WHEREAS the Local Government Act empowers a local government to adopt or amend an Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "A" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7664-2020. 2. Appendix Dis amended by adding the following new Temporary Use Area: 2. TEMPORARY COMMERCIAL USE PERMIT AREA LOCATION NO. 9 Purpose: To permit a temporary gravel/ reclaimed asphalt public parking lot. Location: Those parcels or tracts of land and premises shown on Temporary Use Permit Area Location No. 9 map, and known and described as: • Lot A District Lot 401 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan LMP15424; • Lot 2 District Lot 401 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 8695; and • a portion of Lot 120 District Lot 401 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 60562 Except Plan BCP52040. is hereby designated to permit a temporary gravel/ reclaimed asphalt public parking lot, for a three-year period, effective upon issuance of a Temporary Use Permit. Appendix D. Temporary Use Permits, Section TEMPORARY USE PERMIT AREA is amended by the addition of the attached Temporary Use Permit Area Location No. 9 map in sequential numeric order after Temporary Commercial Use Permit Area Location No. 8. I-I t: f f_ : l-r I- 3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of REAB-A-S£66ND-TIME-the --n· arof-PUBLIC HEARING HELD the READ A THIRD TIME the ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER day of day of ,2020. -----~.2020-.----~ , 2020. , 2020. ,2020. CORPORATE OFFICER ------, 1 : I I I. I-~-~: j; ; __J-~ ' ' I'-' ,. ' ~ f_-0. ,. ,.· C = = C c-,~ t r-f=-r p V [, :-L-t f F f~ 1~--i: !.: i i ~---0 °" ~ IO ~ IO <o <o N "" N 300 N C, "' "' "' "' ..... co "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' 4 5 6 LOTA 5 7 8 9 297 298 299 "' I a. 12047 12038 p 8081 (P9687) ~446 301 Rem.A *LMP182 10 p P43 724 ~ 1--BCP 34253 12003 LMP 1946( ..... 2 ! I M /09 12018 P 96817 p 9446 "<t M r--P, 0546 11 (J) 303 2 1 (") 1 r--(J) A 11 "<t r--P 44882 ,-.. a. ,-.. <D ..... <o ..... ..... ..... ~ 1o 1 IO f I IO a. co *PP094 "' ..... <Xl a, ...J gJ "" "' IO IO ~ <o 0.. "' "' "' >--"' "' -"' -~ ' ' ,. DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD ,. ,. ' ' -' ,. l1J <o ~ ~ l!) <D ' ' _,,c,-· ~ C, ~ C, C, C, ..... co I ' IO a, <o 1o <o <Xl <o N 0 I-IO IO IO "' "' ~ "' "' "' "' "' "' "' "' N "<t Rem.A "' "' . "' "' "' "" l!) "' ~<l'. ;g 4 ..... l!) Rem. Rem. <D a. P 9541 ' CP :264 "' a. 117 ~ O::'. West 3 "' I Rem. LANE I 81.5 0 P 8695 61 11980 I:> -NWS 2403 "<t 4 co l!) 11971 N Feet l!) P 51167 ..... 3 f:-/J) "<t 4 0.. *PP093 N 11970 *PP084 I s "<t LP 73289 "' RCMP 2 co p 863 ..... 11963 I ~ 11996 z co a. B a. 2 P 9541 ! P6 LANE I 3 MclNTOSH AVE. co 11940/48 se r--~ 3 co RP 6 D C() 78 <D a.11947 C() <Xl 0 (P 9541) NW~ IO l!) a. C() IO P 60562 ~· "' c "Rem 2 a. "' EP E Rem 120 ' a. 11937 I LMP 15424 l!) ~P1 >640 *PP088 11920/26 IO A f2 2;;; ~2 1 a, 11931 E ~IO I "' C, C, <o ~ <o (0 ;g Remt P 9541 .......... "' "' "' "' "'"' ! "' "' "' -\ "'"' Plan 81350 f 119AVE. (J) P7 <D l!) C, . f <Xl ..... "1 ~ 1~~A~ (0 EPS 1222 "' I "' a. ~ LM~ EPP 9012 l (LEA! R~10 a. 1346....J 2 (EPS 463 0) I 11882 EPP 65496 ~ 11893 4 l!) M 27 11890 "<t "<t :243 7 . ..... L ' r' ..... N '. (/) 3 ,-.. l a. a. ,-.. Place Mall r' t--..... ft Cf) N 11876 "' N "' (0 C() 4 3 N M SELKIRK AVE. r-N EPP 654!:6 l!) 1900 11862~ EPP 65496 r--I (") r ,_ r--~Rem. a. 11865 r--f w "1 (J) 2 l!) co "1 ..... "<t 0 k (0 "' 0.. 11858 ~ 0.. r, "' S 11844 ..... 0.. r • SELKIRK AVE. SELKIRK AVE. 1 0.. ! 13 11834 ~ P BE 15 P 76002 *LMP 2153~ I Pf 615 N 14 2 <o 3 l!) 11837 '" "' t--118 AAVE. ..... p 1, 017 "' "<t 12 15 <D 20 21 r--M-6 7 ~7q 1 () C() A ...... r--( -I r CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE I I TEMPORARY USE PLANNING DEPARTMENT I ...-. PERMIT AREA 1~1 •. 111 I N Location No. 9 mapleridge.ca I Scale: 1 :2,000 DATE: Aug 19, 2020 BY:DT t TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7611-2020; 20857 Golf Lane MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: September 1, 2020 2019-394-RZ cow An application has been received to rezone the subject property located at 20857 Golf Lane from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-1 (Residential District), to permit a future subdivision of approximately six (6) single family lots. Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7611-2020 on February 4, 2020. The minimum lot size for the current R-1 (Residential District) zone is 371 m2. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. Pursuant to Council policy, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution Program at a rate of $5,100.00 per single family lot, for an estimated amount of $30,600. There is not sufficient suitable land for park dedication on the subject site and it is recommended that Council require the developer to pay to the City an amount that equals fiver percent (5%) the market value of the land required for parkland purposes, as determined by an independent appraisal. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7611-2020 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2) That Council require, as a condition of subdivision approval, the developer to pay to the City an amount that equals 5% of the market value of the land, as determined by an independent appraisal, in lieu of parkland dedication in accordance with Section 510 of the Local Government Act; and, 3) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii) Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; iii) Road dedication on Golf Lane as required; 1105 2019-394-RZ Page 1 of 6 ~-~ f---I I. I iv) v) vi) vii) viii) ix) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; Registration of a Statutory Right-of-Way plan and agreement for the driving, shooting hitting or otherwise of golf balls onto, into, through, over and above the subject property; Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management; Removal of existing buildings; In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. (If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site); and That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $30,600 ($5,100 per lot) be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. DISCUSSION: 1) Project Description: The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-1 (Residential District). The proposed development is a six (6) lot single-family residential subdivision (see Appendix D). The subject property is located within the Fraser River Escarpment Area; therefore, the proposed development is subject to Council Policy 6.24. 2) Planning Analysis: i) Official Community Plan: The OCP designated the subject property as Urban Residential and falls within the Neighbourhood Residential category. This category manages residential growth through infill and intensification in a manner that respect the neighbourhood and the existing physical character of the surrounding areas. l=i'1e-foH0w~Ag-GGP policies su13130Fl:-U1e-13F013osed zoning,-;-:-----Policy-3-19 Neighbourhood Residential Infill This policy supports residential infill subject to compliance with the following criteria: 1) Infill development on a property that is larger than the prevailing lot size of the surrounding neighbourhood or existing zoning of the lot may include the following: a) a possible change in lot size and configuration providing that: i) the proposed lot area and width should be not less than 80% of the lot area and width prescribed under the predominate or adjacent zoning in the surrounding neighbourhood; 2019-394-RZ Page 2 of 6 ii) the proposed lot configuration is similar to the predominate lot pattern that exists within the neighbourhood; and iii) the proposed housing form is consistent in scale an massing to that of the surrounding neighbourhood. The proposed lot concept plan included in the applications, is similar to the predominate lot pattern that exists within the neighbourhood. Since the proposed subdivision layout and lot size area in keeping the neighbourhood, the size and scale of new housing will be similar to the existing neighbourhood homes and is supportable. Policy 3-21 All Neighbourhood Residential Infill developments will respect and reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of established neighbourhoods. The proposed zoning with the associated conceptual subdivision is in keeping the existing neighbourhood lot configuration and housing form. ii) Zoning Bylaw: The application is to rezone the property located at 20857 Golf Lane from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) zone to permit a six (6) lot single-family subdivision (See Appendix D). iii) Proposed Variances: A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves the following relaxations: Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, Schedule "D" Minimum Lot Area and Dimensions. • To vary the minimum lot width from 12 m to 9.96 for proposed lot 1; and • To vary the minimum lot width from 12 m to 11.91 for proposed lot 2 thru 5. Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing By-law No. 4800-1993. • To vary the minimum right-of-way from 18 m to 15 m. his retaxaticln-is minor in n-ature-amtth-e-lots are-in excess-otthe--minimam parcel-size-forthe-R=t zone. The requested variances to minimum lot width requirement and right-of-way will be the subject of a future Council report. iv) Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was conducted via the Public Comment Opportunity process from May 10 to May 19, 2020. Three individuals contacted the applicant via email. A summary of the main comments and discussions with the attendees was provided by the applicant and include the following main points: • Two individuals were interested in what the homes would look like and what the general plan was for the project. The applicant responded to them immediately with the information available and requested that they send us their contact information if they wanted to be on 2019-394-RZ Page 3 of 6 l i record with any comments. The applicant concludes that the his responses were satisfactory to these individuals as they made no further comments. • One individual's comments were received on May 18th the owner/operator of the Maple Ridge Golf Course at 20818 Golf Lane. He sent the applicant an email that highlighted seven (7) concerns he had with the project. -~1=-~oise com laints from new residents from Lawnmowers in the morning~s_; __ _ 2) Potential noise complaints with patrons in the parking lot leaving events late in the evening; 3) Storm Water; 4) Street Light; 5) Their water service line not costing them to be moved or fixed; 6) Covenants placed on newly created Lots for noise and errant golf balls; 7) Noise from building disturbing Tee box #8 and #9. The applicant advised that he believed the best way to address the concerns outlined in the email was to telephone the owner/operator of the Maple Ridge Golf Course. The applicant advised that he had a very constructive conversation which has set a good base for a healthy relationship moving forward. The applicant advised that he sent a summary email to the owner/operator of the Maple Ridge Golf Course of their conversation. The applicant advised that the owner/operator of the Maple Ridge Golf Course was not opposed to the development of the property and saw that it has its benefits to the area, however, as the project moves forward owner/operator of the Maple Ridge Golf Course desires to minimize the potential impacts it may have on the business. In response to the comments from the owner/operator of the Maple Ridge Golf Course the applicant assured owner/operator of the Maple Ridge Golf Course that the applicant was doing his part to be a respectful neighbour and minimize noise during the building process (when and where possible). The applicant mentioned he will look into applying a legal agreement on the newly created lots so all future residents know they live near a golf course and some nuisances from time to time may be experienced. ,_ f [ I It will be a project requirement for applicant to install the storm sewer along with a future street light. !: i Lastly, there would be no concern regarding the Golf Course waterline, if affected, it would be at f, applicant's-cost for-repair. The-apl=)lieant adviseel-that the-ewAerfoperater-e-f-tMe Ma13le-R-iElge Gelf------s--Course was very satisfied with these solutions and applicants response to the concerns. ~-v) Parkland Requirement: As there are more than two additional lots proposed to be created, the developer will be required to comply with the park dedication requirements of Section 510 of the Local Government Act prior to subdivision approval. For this project, there is no suitable land for park dedication on the subject property and it is therefore recommended that Council require the developer to pay to the City an amount that equals the market value of 5% of the land required for parkland purposes. The amount payable to the City in lieu of park dedication must be derived by an independent appraisal at the developer's expense. Council consideration of the cash-in-lieu amount will be the subject of a future Council report. 2019-394-RZ Page 4 of 6 j I l-_ ~: 3) Traffic Impact: As the subject property is located within 800 metres of the Lougheed Highway, a referral has been sent to the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. A total of six (6) new homes will not significantly affect the existing traffic volume or traffic pattern in the area. 4) Interdepartmental Implications: -i}-Engineering-Bepartment~: ----Servicing Road -Golf Lane is designated as an urban local road and will need to be built to an urban local standard across the full frontage at the subdivision stage. The Right-of-Way (ROW) for an urban local road is 18 m; the current ROW is approximately 15 m. Engineering is supportive of a variance to the ROW for Golf Lane from the required width of 18 m to 15 m. Sanitary Sewer -At subdivision stage 6 new service connections off of the existing 200mm sanitary sewer on Golf Lane is required to service the 6 new proposed lots. At subdivision stage the forcemain on Golf Lane may require realignment. Sidewalk - A concrete sidewalk on the north side of Golf Lane will be required behind the curb at the subdivision stage. Storm Sewer/Drainage -The subject property is not serviced by a municipal storm sewer; therefore the line will need to be extended to either the east or west property line. Engineering will not support a storm sewer line through the rear of the proposed lots. Geotechnical Considerations -The subject site is located within the Fraser River Escarpment; therefore Council Policy 6.24 requires that the applicant supply a geotechnical report that addresses the requirements outlined in the policy. The applicant has supplied a geotechnical report prepared by Valley Geotechncial Engineering Services Ltd dated February 21, 2020 which satisfies Policy 6.24 (See Appendix G). ii) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department: The Parks Department is not interested in acquiring this lot; therefore, park dedication is to be provided as cash in lieu payment. iii) Fire Department: The Fire Department has no issues with the application moving forward. That each lot needs to be addressed individually. iv) Building Department: A referral was sent to Building and no comment has been provided. 2019-394-RZ Page 5 of 6 CONCLUSION: It is recommended that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7611-2020, and that application 2019-394-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. It is further recommended that Council require, as a condition of subdivision approval, the .developer to pay to the City an amount that equals 5% of the market value of the land, as determined by an _____ independent a raisal, in lieu of parkland dedication. "Original signed by Wendy Cooper" Prepared by: Wendy Cooper, MSc., MCIP, RPP Planner "Original signed by Mark McMullen" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Al Horsman" Concurrence: Al Horsman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7611-2020 ----.Appendix_D-=-Site Plan_ Appendix E-Geotechnical Report 2019-394-RZ Page 6 of 6 (/) z[> (") Fl Dl ro 20758 20759 ...,. N 01 20764 20767 0 1 i 0 0 !! )> r -I m m .. .• I\) zo 0 ~ < 'P ~ w District of Mission °' co N ~~I Ii \ I ~~ ~ cl () . . -...J 3 rr-g G) m u, o "C .. l, r -(0 "T1 CD -...J :::::!o I r Q. (0 )> (10, Oz CD .....i.. m n .m 20776 77 I I 20779 -c,;; _,,------•.•.:,:," ,: ,:,: ··:,.",,,., .• , ;:-;-.,:7:-,r,:-lI,j; ;l,:l · --~ > z m 20720 I ~1 ~ 20740 1 20750 20760 20732 I GJ 20744 0 r "T1 r 20756 ~ \ 2076 7 209 ST. r ~I I I 1 20910 20905 I 20915 20920 u, ~ I 20925 20930 I rn GJ 0 r "T1 > 1 20935 20940 z m 20945 20950 20955 20960 / 20970 20965 I ~ 20745 ~ 20755 m \ 20765 I 20771 20903 20913 \ 20927 "' ~ ~ STEE VEs s r. } ~ --- 1' 20972 7 l ___ II "' ;;; 0, 0, <o C ~ "' <o "' - --0, Rl 20961 ';;; "' .;; ~ 20981 rn )> 0, 0, lg "' ""'C ..... ""'C IT1 z 0 0, 0, ~ ... >< C )> .. ~-,111 11 .I 'I ] l :j Scale: 1 :2,500 APPENDIX B 20857 GOLF LANE PIO: 005-397-901 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~·-· FILE: 2019-394-RZ DATE: Nov 15, 2019 maple ridge.ca BY:PC CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7611-2020 APPENDIXC A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended i.:i ,.-= !~~ ------------------------------------------1-~ WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7611-2020." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 185 District Lot 277 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 40699 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1826 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 11th day of February, 2020. READ a second time the day of ,20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of ,20 READ a third time the day of ,20 tj fl i ,-i I I ~ --AeeROVED by-tbe-Ministcy_oLiranspoctatlon andJnf.rastructurn_tbis_ da}'.'_o~f ______ ---;--[-, 20 ADOPTED, the day of ,20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 5112 0 ~ "' 109 '" 0 ~ 2 p 352 11616 P3 160 '" C 37 B P 31152 116AVE. 0 (') ffi r---co (0 (') D 0. E &! L.MP5112 57 27 P40400 2 115AVE. 0 ~ '" 13 p Rem13 P 21114 11450 " 30 ~ ~ g GOLF LANE EP 60915 / 0 '" " "' ~ ~ ,!: ~ 0 0 0 '" '" '" '" A 2 3 4 -r Im II~ I~ P60 14 Jo.. JW LANE 01 LM 23463 18 19 2 0, " a, ~ ~ ~ 0 0 '" '" "" " "' ~ ~ " " 0 0 0 11 '" 10 '" 9 '"8 LANE 01 P84260 368 P54678 II II II II II II RW 24967 11 P40699 1, 185 I '' ,, Rems P19225 28 LMP 28093 I-" (/) "' 0 '" 10 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 16 ~ 11480 17 11470 18 GOLF LANE 0 ~ 110 \~---------~~-~~~~ : ~ ! t0 b tt I r 101 r II I 1: ! = l 11 F [-".. 1 ~ II i -----.--1============1===============================================1·-l---i 4 5 6 7 "' "'· MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia 7611-2020 1826 RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) R-1 (Residential District) 6 N SCALE 1:2,500 !. -I~ i t r I I I l I I I_ APPENDIXD SKETCH PLAN FOR PROPOSED 6 LOT SUBD/1/JSION . 20857 Golf Lane, Maple Ridge, BC 368 11.93 11.92 11.92 1 Co/,r 11.92 11.92 11.92 1-···-·1 r··--1 ,-··-1 1 4 I I 5 l 6 I New Area = I New Area = 1 New Area = 634.6 m2 I 694.8 m2 180.5 m2 I I I I I I I 1 I I ,~ ~ I 1 1'5 ~~11 I I I r-r--,-......-I I 10° I ~...::...,,11~ I I I I Rem 8 -R--1-laning;:·------'~----..s. 017,-;;;;;,<'\,-----~ Min. Width: 12 m .._-Min. Depth: 24 m Min. Area: 371 m2 Setbacks: front 5. 5 m rear 8.0 m interior side 1.2 m exterior side 3. 0 m Min. Building Area 8 x 12 footprint Notes: Lot Width D VP. Lot dimensions are based on Plan 40699 and may change with a legal survey. 0 Terra Pacific Land Surve in Ltd Paper Size: 12" x 8.5" Date: November 12, 2019 File: MR19-416\MR16-564skDESIGN_6 SCALE 1 : 500 25 50 m· 22371 St. Anne Avenue, Maple Ridge, BC Tel: 604-463-2509 I f I I ! ~--f ---L i I i I l I i I VALLEY GEOTECHNICAL Engineering Services Ltd. True Light Building & Development l'iC:l~[(fl:i;} i;r.o~t:a.~,11:rrs '''"' ,i:>..1~~t=• APPENDIX E Unit 15 -20279 97th Avenue Langley, BC, V1 M 4B9 February 21, 2020 Valley Geo Project #: 50284-02 __ A~tt=e~n~t~io~n~: --~J~o~n=at~h~a~n~C~ra=ig, __________________ _ Regarding: Geotechnical Investigation and Report for Proposed 6-Lot Subdivision at 20857 Golf Lane, Maple Ridge, BC 1.0 INTRODUCTION Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd (Valley Geo) has been retained by Jonathan Craig of True Light Building & Development to carry out a geotechnical investigation and provide a report for the proposed 6-lot subdivision at the subject site. This report summarizes our work to date and presents geotechnical recommendations pertinent to the subdivision and development of the subject site. This report addresses the stability of slopes at the site using APEGBC's guidelines for "Legislated Landslide Assessments for Proposed Residential Developments in BC (Revised in May 201 O)". Based on our work, we conclude that the site is safe for the use intended with reference to the 2018 BC Building Code, Section 56 of the Community Charter, as per Bulletin #2012-021 and Section 86 of the Land Title Act. This report may be used by the City of Maple Ridge Approving Officer for subdivision approval, and for development and building permit considerations. The site is located within 300m and up to 1 OOm from the crest of the Fraser River Escarpment. In accordance with the Fraser River Escarpment Policy Summary, dated June 24, 2017 (for properties located within 300 meters and up to 100 meters from the crest of the escarpment): • All groundwater or landscaping/surface/building drainage for any additions, new construction and hard surface landscaping must be connected to the City storm drainage system (City ditch or storm sewer). [Policy 6.23, dated March 24, 2004] • A Geotechnical Report must be submitted to Inspections Services and accepted by the Building Official. Subsequently, a Section 219 Covenant must be prepared, with the Geotechnical Report attached as a schedule. [Policy 6.24, dated March 24, 2004] This report addresses the requirements of the above noted Policies. As described above, this report must be attached to a Section 219 Covenant and be registered on the property title prior to the issuance of any building permit. 2.0 INFORMATION REVIEWED In the preparation of this report, we have reviewed the following documents: • Geotechnical Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Fraser River Escarpment, by Golder Associates Ltd. (March 23, 2004) • (604) 882-8475 l2J general@valleygeo.ca <D.\ www.valleygeo.ca r -' -r ,_ :-' ' I i [~: r--t-· I r i ! l f [ r r i I ! : ! _ I ~: j:~ I i !-= 1~ I ! f-l i:_ [' I l ! Geotechnical Investigation & Report for Proposed 6-Lot Subdivision 20857 Golf Lane, Maple Ridge, BC February 21, 2020 Page2 • Geotechnical Investigation Fraser River Escarpment, by Golder Associates Ltd. (Feb. 12, 2008) i ·:.I • Fraser River Escarpment Policy No. 6.23 & 6.24, by District of Maple Ridge (March 24, 2004) \:,,_ • Fraser River Escarpment Policy Summary, by City of Maple Ridge (June 24, 2017) _ • Geological Survey of Canada Map 1484A [: ________ • __ C~ity of MaQle Ridge Online MaQQ!!!_g_fustem (Ridgeview), ____________________ -'-'-, In addition, we have also reviewed several files in our system for the general vicinity of the site. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The subject property has a civic address of 20857 Golf Lane in Maple Ridge. The legal description of the site is LT 185; DL 277; NWD; PL NWP40699. The site is irregular in shape, with a total plan area of approximately 0.365ha. The site is bounded by Maple Ridge Elementary to the north, a private residential lot to the east, private parking lot to the west, and the Maple Ridge Golf Course to the south (separated by Golf Lane). There is an existing residence located in the east half of the property. According to a topographic survey by Terra Pacific, and the City of Maple Ridge Online Mapping System (Ridgeview), the site is relatively flat, at an elevation of approximately 20m geodetic. To the east of the site, the grades slope towards the east at gradients generally between 7-15%. It is proposed to subdivide the subject property into six lots. The lots will have plan areas of between approximately 455m2 and 780m2. We anticipate that a slab-on-grade, single-family residence will be constructed on each lot. The topographic survey and proposed subdivision layout are attached as Appendix A and B, respectively. 4.0 SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS j I I r i : i I ! I [ I I: I f I I I L I I According to the published Geological Survey of Canada Map 1484A, the s·ubsurface soils are of Sumas Drift deposits (Se). Se soils consist of raised proglacial deltaic gravel and sand up to 40m thick. Se soils in the area of the subject site are generally underlain by Fort Langley Formation deposits (FLd), which consist of marine silty clay to fine sand. --~-----------------------------------1-i Valley Geo carried out a soil investigation including auger drilling and Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) on February 6, 2020, using a track-mounted solid-stem drill rig provided by OnTrack Drilling, and cone data provided by Schwartz Soil Technical. A total of two (2) augers holes were drilled to a depth of 13.7m below the existing ground surface, while the cone was advanced to a depth of 23.5m. An investigation location plan and soil logs are attached as Appendix C. Generally, the soil conditions encountered during the soil investigation consisted of the following: • A surficial layer of sand and gravel fill, up to 0.9m thick, over • Native, medium-dense, grey sand and gravel, up to 2.1 m thick, over • Grey, clayey silt with interbedded layers of silty sand, to the maximum depth explored. CPT data indicates that the native clayey silt has undrained shear strength values (Su) between 20-50kPa. Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd. r-1 I r 1: I. : ~-i I I Geotechnical Investigation & Report for Proposed 6-Lot Subdivision 20857 Golf Lane, Maple Ridge, BC February 21, 2020 Page3 Water was observed at a depth of 0.9m below the ground surface at the time of our investigation. It is expected that the water is perched over the relatively impermeable clayey silt. Based on groundwater pressure dissipation testing carried out by Golder nearby, the water level elevation at the time of their investigation was measured to be at approximately 14m geodetic. 5.0 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS In accordance with the British Columbia Building Code {2018), the Site Class is E. Data provided by Earthquakes Canada (2015) indicate that the site, under ''firm ground" conditions (Site Class C), could be subject to a Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) of 0.308g and seismic hazard values of Sa(0.2)=0.708g, Sa{0.5)=0.618g, Sa{1.0)=0.358g, and Sa(2.0)=0.221 g during a 1-in-2475-year design earthquake. Based on the soil and groundwater conditions underlying the site, the potential for liquefaction is low. 6.0 SLOPE ST ABILITY ANALYSIS Valley Geo has carried out a slope stability analysis of the slopes to the east of the subject site. The slope configuration is based on topographic information obtained from Ridgeview. The stability of the slopes was evaluated using the Slope/W program from the GeoStudio 2007 software package. This computer software conducts limit equilibrium slope stability analyses using the Morgenstern-Price Method. The slope stability analysis is based upon the 2018 BC Building Code and the APEGBC guidelines for "Legislated Landslide Assessments for Proposed Residential Developments in BC (revised in May 201 O)". The minimum requirements for the static factor of safety is 1.5. Under seismic conditions, a slope displacement-based seismic coefficient (k1s method) was utilized. A factor of safety of 1.0 or higher under the k1s method is considered acceptable for residential development. The following table summarizes the results of the stability analysis. Cross-Section Factor of Static Seismic Safety FS > 1.5? FS > 1.0? I Static a.a2· " -Ak:.. Section A-A I I Seismic 1.151 n/a y Based on the results of our analysis, we confirm that the slopes are considered to be stable. Plots of the slope stability results and the APEGBC Landslide Assessment Assurance Statement are attached as Appendix D. Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd. ' ' ' t i I I I -~-Geotechnical Investigation & Report for Proposed 6-Lot Subdivision 20857 Golf Lane, Maple Ridge, BC 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS =-~-~-: February 21, 2020 Page4 Provided the recommendations presented in this report are followed, it is our opinion that the site is safe for the use intended with reference to the 2018 BC Building Code, Section 56 of the Community Charter, ____ as_per Bulletin #2012-02, and Section 86 of the Land Title Act. The following sub-sections outline our recommendations for development. 7 .1 Site Preparation Site preparation should include the stripping and removal of all topsoil, organics, fill materials, and any other unsuitable soils extending at least 1 m horizontally beyond the building areas. After stripping of the site as per the above, the exposed subgrade should be reviewed by Valley Geo. Any detected soft spots should be sub-excavated and replaced with structural fill compacted to 100% of the Standard Proctor Maximum Dry Density (SPMDD) in lifts not exceeding 300mm in thickness. All structural fill should consist of clean, free-draining, well-graded 75 mm minus sand and gravel having less than 5 percent passing a 0.075 mm (USS 200) sieve. 7.2 Excavations All excavations must conform to Worksafe BC excavation regulations which can be found in Part 20 from Section 20.78 to 20.95 of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation posted on the website of Worksafe BC. Excavations deeper than 1.2m or below a slope should be carried out in accordance with the written recommendations of a Professional Geotechnical Engineer prior to workers entering the excavations. 7.3 Foundations ~ I f f I ~ r·= f r~ I 1--f ~-. !-~-2-l: l F ~; r~ We anticipate that the new buildings will be constructed with a slab-on-grade. Therefore, we expect f. that the foundations will bear on the native, dense sand and gravel. All bearing surfaces must be L Fevieweel-and-appFeved-ey-Valley-Ge0-pFior-t0-tl:le-plaGemer:it-0f-ar:iy-fill or-cor:1sttuction-of-footiA9s,~. -----__ "'"". The following design parameters may be used for foundation design: Ultimate Limit States (ULS) Serviceability Limit States (SLS) Site Class Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) 108kPa (2250psf) 72kPa (1500psf) E 0.308g We recommend that all spread and strip footings have a minimum width of 600mm and 450mm, respectively. All exterior footings must be provided with a minimum soil cover of 450mm for frost protection. Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd. Geotechnical Investigation & Report for Proposed 6-Lot Subdivision 20857 Golf Lane, Maple Ridge, BC 7.4 Floor Slabs February 21, 2020 Page 5 A 150mm thick layer of 19mm minus gravel (road mulch) compacted to 100% SPMDD should be placed immediately below the slab. Any areas not able to be properly compacted should be backfilled with -----1-9mm-clear-cr-Usl:l graV-el.-A----V-apour:-barrier-below the-slab-is----also-tecommended. Slabs-sl:lould--be suitably reinforced and should incorporate adequate control joints to minimize crack development. 7.5 Drainage In accordance with the City of Maple Ridge Policy 6.23 for areas within the Fraser River Escarpment area, runoff detention systems relying on water infiltration into the soils are not permitted. All groundwater or landscaping/surface/building drainage for any additions, new construction and hard surface landscaping must be connected to the City storm drainage system (City ditch or storm sewer). [Policy 6.23, dated March 24, 2004] Perimeter drains should be provided at or below the foundation level of the building. The drains should consist of a perforated pipe surrounded with drain-rock, encapsulated in a non-woven, needle-punched filter fabric and backfilled with relatively free-draining soil. Perimeter drains should be directed to a sump and then to a designed stormwater system. Roof water as well as stormwater from any catch basins should also be connected to the designed stormwater system. Roof run-off must not be tied into the perimeter drainage system. Exterior building grades should be sloped at a minimum gradient of 1.5% to shed water away from the building. 7.6 Erosion and Sediment Control (ESC) As per City the Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection Bylaw 6410-2006, appropriate ESC measures must be taken to minimize erosion and prevent contamination of stormwater systems during construction. Valley Geo is prepared to provide ESC designs and inspections for the individual lots, ____ .upon re!:jues_t. Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd. ' -' ' :-:-:2:. : ,-l: I-I-i -:-= ___ ~ --~-= Geotechnical Investigation & Report for Proposed 6-Lot Subdivision 20857 Golf Lane, Maple Ridge, BC 8.0 LIMITATIONS AND CLOSURE February 21, 2020 Page6 Provided that the recommendations presented in this report are followed during design and construction. We confirm that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the subject site is safe for the use intended. We request _______ tbaUbe-1inaLar_chite_cJurnLan.d_civil drawings for the_devel_opnieJlt be forwardecLto_u_sioLte_vJe_w_wbe_L~----available so that additional recommendations can be provided, if necessary. The recommendations provided in this report are based on the analysis of results of the subsurface investigation and other information deemed relevant to the subject site. Variations in the subsurface conditions should be anticipated. If conditions different from those presented in this report are encountered during construction, Valley Geo should be notified immediately to examine the conditions and reassess our recommendations. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of True Light Building & Development and their agents for the purpose stated. It has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices and no other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Any use which a Third Party makes of this report, or reliance on decisions to be made based on it, is the responsibility such Third Party. We trust that this report provides you with the information required at this time. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Yours truly, Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd. List of Attachments: ~,,,io1'0 Joel Blanco, P.Eng. Geotechnical Engineer -Appendix A-Site Topographic Survey, by Terra Pacific Land Surveying Appendix B -Proposed Subdivision Layout Plan Appendix C -Geotechnical Investigation Location Plan & Soil Logs Appendix D -Slope Stability Analysis & APEGBC Landslide Assessment Assurance Statement Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd. ,-,_ ' t f i-t I I I t~~ i~ I VALLEY GEOTECHNICAL Engineering Services Ltd. Appendix A Unit 15 -20279 97th Avenue Langley, BC, V1 M 489 Site Topographic Survey, by Terra Pacific Land Surveying 'ilir (604)882-8475 l2J general@valleygeo.ca <i\ www.valleygeo.ca 1. 1-' r r-,- ,.1·: I,. -I 20857 Golf Lone, Maple Ridge, BC L-----,---,:--;-,.9:;;,;J,------;,1.;:;.92:;;--·----11.92 R-1 Zoning: Min. Width: 12 m Min-:-Bep-t-h-:-24-m----~~--Min. Area: 371 m2 Setbacks: front 5.5 m rear 8.0 m interior side 1.2 m exterior side 3. 0 m Min. Building Area 8 x 12 footprint Note: Lot Width DVP I!' 0 ~ 11.92 11.92 r-----·1 5 New Area= I 694.8 m2 I I 11.92 ,---___ ,,_ ---' i ' r::; ' u I New Area= 1so.s m2 I Paper Size: 12" x 8.5" Date: November 12, 2019 File: MR19-416 \MR16-564skD£SIGN_6 SCALE 1 : 500 25 50 m ~ 22371 St. Anne Avenue, Maple Ridge, BC Tel: 604-463-2509 L I ! r I I _J ! I I .--"'-_-r_--VALLEY GEOTECHNICAL Engineering Services Ltd. 11 (604) 882-8475 Appendix B Proposed Subdivision Layout Plan l2J general@valleygeo.ca Unit 15 -20279 97th Avenue Langley, BC, V1 M 489 G.\ www.valleygeo.ca -F:: ;:i:i:;r1 (ID @-Terra Pacific Land Surveying Ltd 22J71 SL Aline Awriue. Maple Ridge, BC Phcn« &OH&J-2509 r .. 604-463-4501 Client : ,,.t> f~,,. 368 l' i~ .. ~,, True U'ght Building & Development f''' ,I f,-1 .,..,. l' ,,.,+ 19, ...,r_ Project: ,J' ,i++ 'fl ,, "' .;, -+!.-:. l' .!t:--20857 Golf Lone *~ t,_"' 1'_~ -I--+:--~~.:-~-Maple Ridge, BC ~fa -t:"'- I .<£¥' "'. ~-, ... I "'fa :i Drawing Tille: ,• "" f--"' Topographic Survey ,: -l-lid l'' Pion of Lot 185 1 --District Lot 277 185 New Westminster District ,,I> I"'+ ~" f," Rem 8 Pion NWP40699 ,:, "'f,. !-fJ "'' ... f,_1 ~ -e .... --c-.ct 11 i-lWt Thi, 211d Doy Of OctOOdl", 2019 L 1 ,i. l''.;. ,,i' e,_ of' !~ :"ij /Jn ·t 'I' 1i1J1!r .f.- 1JH~a,1.11 '"'i>'"J' --Mlle Bememann. sa.s ;' ,:I ~ /'.. ~ I '"j .. ~.,. --@ &uwy Control II01111trH1nt :;r," f,'J, l' ... T,w {11od At POftt Of Cntry lr,lr, 111• Gromld) ,1;i!I . Ground E1ewUon :qJf!J 121 Caldl 8o.m ''! --Oltdl(S,,aie) ....IL.. C. Of A,pha/t 9 Fh H,Pant I-Guy ..... -ln1P«:l/on a.amber G ......... a LCll'l'tp Stondord 0 """""· ~ l'orNrPold Powr An lflh Light "" .., ........ Benchmark Notes: If~ l'l . ~ 1 1 ! ~ Gos Va/19 Elevations Are Geodetic Go,'"'· Referred to Monumenl:84H006J ~ ¥' Monument Elevation: 18.604m localed Al: the centre of the inlerseclian of I .. --- Westfield Av and 20 7 St. f--'' Scafe: 1: 250 1 Verica/ Datum: CVD28GVRD2018 I SCALE 1 : 250 Date: Del. 2nd. 2019 Of lot dimensions are based on plan 40699 and 0 5 10 1 15 20 25m &---I 1 may change with a current legal survey. I File: MR/9-416 TOPO VALLEY GEOTECHNICAL Engineering Services Ltd. Appendix C Unit 15 • 20279 97th Avenue Langley, BC, V1 M 4B9 Geotechnical Investigation Location Plan & Soil Logs 'illT (604) 882-8475 ~ general@valleygeo.ca <B.\ www.valleygeo.ca -·.~,;~~ '?' ·,t~ ":·~ -~.,~-VALLEY GEOTECHNICAL Englnee~ng Services Ltd. Unit 15 20279 97th Avenue Langley BC, V1M 4B9 Phone: (604) 882-8475 Fax: (604) 882-8476 True Light Bl!Jilding j Location: 20857 Golf t.:n Maple Ridge, BC FILE No. 50284-02 DATE February 11th 2020 \\Vges-S1V-dc1\VGES\VGES-PROJECTS\50200\50284-02\DRAWINGS\(50284-02) 2020-02-07 Auger Hole L ' ... : ... ,. ---.. . .. ' ..,..--- A I 2020-02-11 SEAL REV I DATE ··:;!?l!iiiiillI:..~ ... ,i. ., \t,__ ,u, Geoteclmlcal Report DESCRIPTION Soil Investigation Borehole Location Plan liiil!lr !•l''I ) ... ii ri,'''!'' '!:i1 ;·:. ii q>rawn: SH Dwg No. Checked: BL C1 ~cale: 1:500 ------· ~ 0 N (C ~ ,,~?l.,~-. VALLEY GEOTECHNICAL Englnee,tng Services Ltd. .. i.lOQM "~~~!1'1 CERTIFIED AUGER HOLE #1 Unit 15 20279 97th Avenue Langley BC, VlM 4B9 Phone: (604) 882-8475 Fax: (604) 882-8476 r~"~ 1:~l-. .l~if'~~ ,}!/1 qt~ <>.f.t::' ~ ~ ~ DCPT (BLOWS PER FOOT) 10 20 30 40 50 ll---1---1---1-----,,-,.0-~--.---.,..D-ar_k_b_r-ow_n_g-ra_v_e_lly_S_A_N_D_w_i_th_s_o_m_e_s,-ilt-, -m-o-is-t.-----r------·-.;..._;·-23.5% 12.0% 52.7% 63.7% 69.1% 63.3% 61.4% ""--.... 1-.... --5 -2--3--10 ... ... 4--... -15 5--... ... ... 5-.... 20 .... .... 7-1---25 a-'---'-9-... 30 ... .... 10-,_ .... -meaium aense [FILL] Grey SAND with some gravel, moist, medium dense [NATIVE] Grey clayey SILT, very soft, moist-wet [NATIVE] ---5-----10-----15-----20-----25----30---:5 63.1% 0::: 35-al w LL ::c: (f) ~ 53.6% "C Q) Cl g> -' .... .... continue to next page --40 ....... _____ _ Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd. Job No. 50284-02 20857 GOLF LANE, MAPLE RIDGE, BC \\VQeNIV«1WOES\VGE5-PR.OJECTS\5020Ul.50284-02'.0RAWINOS\(502M-02)2020-02-07 ~Hole Logsctwg PAGEC2 l ' ! r I I I I i I ' I: 0 ~ C\I (0 ~ <( :::> 0:: CD w LL I en >. .c -~'~ VAll.EY GEOTECHNICAL Engineering SeMC8:S Ud. .. 1.jOQM ''J;~l:,~!" CERTIFIED AUGER HOLE #1 Unit 15 20279 97th Avenue Langley BC, VlM 4B9 Phone: (604) 882-8475 Fax: (604) 882-8476 ~~~ 1/0~~ ~!1! ,;7 I /,l I'<:. hff DCPT(BLOWSPERFOOT) l'--+---f-/-'-f---+----.i'f'---.----,.---------------------r--100;;.__;;200__;;300__;40;;__:;~~ 28.2% 65.1% 1-__ .,.____ ----ml 13-.... .... ml .... 45 .... 14-.... .... .... 15-.... 50 .... .... 16----.... .... 55 17-.... .... .... .... 18--60 --19----25 20-----21--30 .... -22-.... .... .... 35 23-.... .... --24-END Grey silty fine SAND, wet-saturated, medium dense [NATIVE] Note: Water seepage measured at 3' below surface CPT test was done by Schwartz Soil Tech Drilling done by OnTrack Drilling ----5-----10-----15-----20-----25-----30----35-----40 ~ __ ....__ _ _.__~ _ __._ _ __. _ __._ _ __, 40 Cl Cl .s Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd. Job No. 50284-02 20857 GOLF LANE, MAPLE RIDGE, BC \\V!)ln~11VGESWGEs-PROJECTS\50200\502&4-0210RAWINGS\(50284-02}202042-07/v9/!lf~l.o!p,d"Ng PAGEC3 I 1:-!~ f:- ~,~ VALLEY GEOTEO-iNICAL l:'.ng!neertng services I.Id. .... ------------4---•--•--16.9% 9.0% 11.8% 58.3% 70.6% 58.9% 68.3% ----•---0 N 0 N co ~ 58.3% :5 59.6% er:: Ill w u. I en ~ ,:, 61.8% Q) C> C> 0 -I .... 1-.... -... 2----3--10 4-.... 5-.... .... .... .... .... 7-.... --25 a-----9--30 --10-_ .... 35 11->-.... .... 12-'"" 40 ------I ;,--_._ -g..-AUGER HOLE #2 Brown fine-coarse SAND with gravel, wet, loose -[FILL] --Grey fine-coarse SAND and gravel, wet, medium dense [NATIVE] Light brown clayey SILT with traces of sand, moist, soft [NATIVE] Grey clayey SILT, wet, very soft [NATIVE] continue to next page Unit 15 20279 97th Avenue Langley BC, V1M 4B9 Phone: (604) 882-8475 Fax: (604) 882-8476 ----5-----10-----15-----20-----25-----30----35-----40 DCPT (BLOWS PER FOOT) 10 20 30 40 ~~ --------'---------1 Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd. Job No. 50284-02 20857 GOLF LANE, MAPLE RIDGE, BC ,WgeHrV-dc.11'.1GES\VGES-f'ROJECTS'.50200\S0234-02\DRAWINGSl(502&4-02)2020-02-07 Auqt,-Ho6e UJ!P.dwg PAGE C4 -~'~' VAUE GEOTECHN!CAL Engnoorlng Senricos Ud. .,!,,IOQM "~"!.'~~ CERTIFIED i,,t"' # ~ 1>?-.!f AUGER HOLE #2 Unit 15 20279 97th Avenue Langley BC, V1M 4B9 Phone: (604) 882-8475 Fax: (604) 882-8476 ~"'~i~f/"' 'f 1: i{"' ,~ if ~ j, r:r I':: 8' 8' ~ DCPT (BLOWS PER FOon 10 20 30 40 50 IIL--4---4---4---1---.i----~------------------"""'T""----------'--,_ I-13--50.5% ml ,_ ,_ 45 ----END 14-.... 15-.... 50 16--.... ,-55 -17-I-I-,_ 18-,_60 I-,_ 19-1--1-25 20-1-Small grey SAND seam viewed at 43'-44' Note: Water Seepage measured at 3' below surface Drilling done by OnTrack Drilling ----5-----10-----15-----20----25--i Ii -----•---'------~ -__ ,_ ------------------1-------1-------l---.... 0 N 0 N co-~ <( ::> a: CD w u. :::c en 1-21-,-30 .... 22-,-.... 35 23-1-,_ .... ~ 24-,_ 40 ~ 1----'----L--__,__ _ _,_ _ _._--"~-----C) C) _g --30-----35-----40 -'-------.11 Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd. Job No, 50284-02 20857 GOLF LANE, MAPLE RIDGE, BC \\Vges.NY«:1\VGES\VOf..S.PROJECTS\SOZ00\502M--O:roRAWINGSl(~) 2020-01.{1f~..._.~ PAGE CS I r. 0. Cl) C 0 0 5 10 ~,~> VALLEY GEOTECHNICAL Engineering Services Ltd. 50 TIP RESISTANCE qt (Bar) 100 150 200 I ~ I ! ' ~-J.~1 -. -l · I (_ r--: ·~- t_ ___ ,:_ c-:--_ .. __ :s:-- 1, r , ·- 20 25 ;, r___:_..--~-:~ Maximum Depth = Depth increment = 23.48 meter 0.02 meter 250 Ope ~ator: Schwartz Soil Technical Soun 1 ding: CPT20 -01 Con j lD: DPG142 Date: February 6, 2020 Site: 20857 Golf Lane, Mpl Rdg Valley project no: 50284 -02 SLEErl E FRICTION (Bar) FRICTION RATIO (%) U2 Pp (Meter) 0 0..5 1 [-1, f_-j : --" c - -·-+''---- 1.5 < <::::;-:? -=----;;,.-__ ...::=::=-- { 11 1 s1Ns FINE GRAIN llz ORGANIC 113 C±Y-SILTYClAY 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 2 3 4 :-----_--..:--~ r---·~ "----· -_-..:=::-- -=s ~ ~ •> -< ? _JT "!~ j; ~) ~---~~. ~-~. "::5. r · --:t...._._ --::::a--f.-: --- ~ F l i.' : ~· r r 'L_:,_.~~ s ~· c.._ ... __ ~ ~--- 114 C.SILT·SILTYClAY i!Jl 5 S. SAND - S. SILT -'J!6 SAND -5 .SAND 5 -10 ' 10 30 50 70 ~----I (1 \l \i I ~ _t . I k;::-"t \ I I I ·--::,-!_ -I J c~·-r I ~-.;~ I I I ---~~. ! I -===:-:>j i I I l ") : ! y I +=~-l,-1 I ! c. ..... _~ I 1~) l ! \ : I . I \ ; I f I L \ i I ; l I i { 90 --- ,~-L _ I /l (fI1-f -I -! lffl 7 GRAVELLY SAND -SAND II 8 v. STIFF ClAY SAND • 9 V. STIFFFINE GRAIN 0 5 10 15 20 25 Schwartz M SO I L~T EC ff Robl rtson, 1990 I SBT(n) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [cw:&:ii:,,_.:;;..,1:::rtHlf.#'~;.:j=L....; I i,,_; -, 'GRAVELLY SAND -SAND ,SAND -SILTY SAND I ' ·cLAY -SILTYCLAY l I ! I I --·-· i I 1: I SENS FINE GRAIN C. SILT 0 SILTYCLAY SENS FINE GRAIN 'C. SILT -SILTY CLAY S.SAND -S. SILT SAND -SIL TY SAND , CLAY -SILTY CLAY .SAND-SILTY SAND S.SAND -S. SILT 'C. SILT-SILTY CLAY CLAY -SILTY CLAY S.SAND • S. SILT . CLAY -SILTY CLAY C. SILT-SILTY CLAY .CLAY-SILTY CLAY C. SILT -SILTY CLAY .SAND• SILTY SAND ,C. SILT-SILTY CLAY --,------:· -----,,.,,-·•occ-:;:,:,:,;;;;;:-;;m"'rr,,nnnnnn,cc,nc""""""mmmn:m1mr.nnnnnannuaannnnnr.mmmmnnm111mmm:mmilmmm!ln1nunrrn;wnrrnnnnnnnrrnnnnnnrrnnrnnnm;im,,i::mim:m':::::~,:ni111:c,11:1,:,1,:11,,}1,;,"11,,:,e:,n·::.',1,1i,:rn,:1;:,::r,r,:i:m:::1,J !,nn:::i:;n:mm,mmnmin111mmrnnnmrnnnr,mm:::::m::n~il:::i: I !":.'t;J:, l:;ijl ill! ,, I g .s:; -C. II) C 0 0 ;s ~,~ VALLEY GEOTECHNICAL 50 Eng,neerlng Services Ltd . TIP RESISTANCE qt (Bar) 100 150 200 "'---' r -· ,....,___ c== r-·---~ 5 H ···· 10 r\ ~--~~ L I E:_ i -------,----- l.. 15 T \=-.f l 20 \..._ r-- r -·---=---:--_.::? --= 25 Maximum Depth = Depth increment= 23.48 meter 0.02 meter 250 0 O~erator: Schwartz Soil Technical so 1 unding: CPT20 -01 ConelD: DPG1427 SPT N(60) (Blow/ft) 10 20 30 40 50 c:j ---..._., ! --I '·~ t_;,. ,....i.. ~ .-·-- I l t ·-~-..... ~ ( q t-~-~,.- ~ '-·------' , i . __ ~~---;--~--~ ---- 11!1 1 1 ENS FINE GRAIN .2 9 RGANIC .3 q LAY·SILTYCLAY .4 C.SILT -SILTYCLAY ful1 5 S. SAND· S. SILT ,:, 6 SAND • S. SAND 0 Date: February 6, 2020 Site: 20857 Golf Lane, Mpl Rdg Valley project no: 50284 -02 Su (kPa) Nkt = 14 50 100 c.:___ ..;;;.:.• ---- ../"~ {--.. ? ':, ~ - \ ~ --~ t ' ) ( < 150 --~----- 200 ~: ··:: @~~--·:_: d----=-=--=~---- _..j \,. l /1 "'-,_ 'i...' "_·_,, __ ;::::.-=-:: ~ -·, 1· --\ > l~ <...,.______________ . ! ----···-· ____ J ~ 7 GRAVELLY SAND -SAND !&j 8 V. STIFF CLAY SAND • 9 V, STIFF FINE GRAIN 0 s 15 20 25 Schwartz SO IL ~TECH Ro J ertson , 1990 I SBT{n) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 L.JD,,.."_j ... £,ci,...,.Jt:?t •.,f ~:t .. .Jj I GRAVELLY SANO· SANO SAND -SILTY SAND ·CLAY· SILTY CLAY SENS FINE GRAIN C. SILT -SILTY CLAY · SENS FINE GRAIN C. SILT -SILTY CLAY . S.SAND • S. SILT .SAND · SILTY SAND CLAY • SILTY CLAY SAND -SILTY SAND S.SAND -S. SILT · C. SILT• SILTY CLAY CLAY -SILTY CLAY S.SAND - S. SILT CLAY -SILTY CLAY C. SILT -SILTY CLAY CLAY -SILTY CLAY C. SILT-SILTY CLAY . SAND • SILTY SAND C. SILT· SILTY CLAY -----------------1---c---:-c . ---,--·----- /<~ ,, i ' :;!!f ' VALLEY GEOTECHNICAL Engineering Services Ltd. Appendix D Slope Stability Analysis Unit 15 -20279 97th Avenue Langley, BC, V1 M 489 & APEGBC Landslide Assessment Assurance Statement 'il)i9 (604)882-8475 ~ general@valleygeo.ca i\ www.valleygeo.ca i L I i-i_ I= ----30 ~,~ VALLEY GEOTECHNICAL Engineering Services Ltd. Unit 15 20279 971h Avenue Langley BC, V1 M 4B9 Phone: (604) 882-8475 www.valleygeo.ca A 2020-02-20 Issued wilh Report REV DATE DESCRIPTION FILE NO. PROJECT LOCATION DWGNO. 50284-02 20857 Golf Lane, Maple Ridge, BC D1 DRAWN DRAWING TITLE/ DESCRIPTION SH Slope Stability CHECKED Site Plan REV. NO. BL DATE 2020-02-20 A SCALE DEVELOPER/ CLIENT SEAL 1:2000 True Light Building NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BC HYDRO, TELUS, FORTIS BC, AND BC ONE CALL ANO TO CONFIRM LOCATIONS OF AU UlllmEs AND APPURTENANCES PRIOR TO CONSTI{UCTION I\Vges-srv-dc1\VGES\VGES-PROJECTS\50200\50284-02\DRAWINGS1(50284-02) 2020-02-11 Slopes.dwg ' I l. -22 .s 16 C: 10 ~ 4 -2 > -8 ~ w -14 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Distance (m) ~,~ VALLEY GEOTECHNICAL Engineering Services Ltd. Unit 15 20279 971h Avenue A 2020-02-20 188Ued with report Langley BC, VIM 4B9 REV DATE DESCRIPTION SEAL 220 ~ame: Grey dense SAND and graL I Unit Weight: 19 kN/m3 Cohesion: 0 kPa Phi: 33 ° 2 Name: Grey clayey SILT Unit Weight: 18 kN/m 3 Cohesion : 5 kPa Phi: 25 ° 3 Name: Grey dense SAND Unit Weight: 19 kN/m3 Cohesion : 0 kPa Phi: 33 ° 240 260 280 300 320 FILE NO. 50284-02 PROJECT LOCATION I 20857 Golf La r e, Maple Ridge, BC DRAWN SH CHECKED BL SCALE 1:2000 DRAWING SETTITLE Slof e Stability DRAWING DESCRIPTION-----r Section A·t Static Conditions DEVELOPER/ CLIENT True Light Building .. ~. fOQM Phone: (604) 882-8475 NOTE: CONTRACTO TO CONTACT BC HYDRO, TELUS, FORTIS BC, AND BC ONE CALL AND TO CONFIRM LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES AND APPUR~NANCES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION www.valleygeo .ca \\Vges-StY-dc1\VGES\VGES-PROJECTS\50200\50284-02\DRAWINGS\Orawing2.dwg '':'.~'!:'· CERTIFIED ,'i,,,.,1.·, .'."'','' ,. ,,····.,;,,1 :j ·' f i oil!} ~ !: : : 1F 11' )111 V1:;I DWGNO. D2 REV.NO. A I -i""'"'"'Vi~'lT 1i:rn: -10 -20 t 1.151 • 1 Name: Grey dense ~AND and gravel Unit Weight: 19 kN/m3 Cohesion: 0 kPa Phi: 33 ° I 2 Name: Grey clayey SILT Unit Weight: 18 kN/ni3 Cohesion: 5 kPa I Phi: 25 ° ~ame: Grey dense l ND Unit Weight: 19 kN/ni3 Cohesion: 0 kPa Phi : 33 ° I I ,..,,, . [ . .. -., o:•·,; .•.. -40 E ( ''"''".'~·~1:~~-: -1 ;.;._ JI -·-, L,.. -t·"'" t ---~· +-r. r.,.,. , ,,,.{,. , .• "' -, .... -50 ;;,; 0 30 60 90 /4:1:1 1~~:> VALLEY GEOTECHNICAL Engineering SeNices Lt d , ,i!t ~ 1gRq~ Unit 15 20279 971h Avenue Langley BC, V1M 4B9 Phone: (604) 882-8475 www .valleygeo.ca 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 Distance {m) FILE NO. PROJECT LOCATION 50284-02 20857 Golf La pe, Maple Ridge.BC DRAWN DRAWING SET TITLE Slo~ Stability SH CHECKED DRAWING DESCRIPTION BL Section A-A Seismic Conditions A I 202o-o2·201 I lnu'1(! wilh Report I SCALE I DEVELOPER/ CLIENT I REV DATE DESCRIPTION SEAL I 1 :2000 True Jlght Building NOTE: CONTRACTdR TO CONTACT BC HYDRO, TELUS, FORTIS BC, AND BC ONE CALL AND TO CONFIRM LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ANO APPURTENANCES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION \\Vges-srv-dc1\VGE5:'VGES·PROJECTS\50200\50284-021DRAWINGS\Drawing2.dwg I 480 IDWGNO. 03 I A I',:, .:); ,j I l i;,'_1'jl l :!'I ii'/ 11·1 I'. 14 .,n ,, ,1m1 111· i:iln lil!il 1· l APPENDIX D: LANDSLIDE ASSESSMENT ASSURANCE STATEMENT Valley Geo #: 50284-02 Note: This Statement is to be read and completed in conjunction with the "APEGBC Guidelines for Legislated Landslide Assessments for Proposed Residential Development in British Columbia', March 2006/Revised September 2008 ("APEGBCGuidelines") and the "2006 BC Building Code (BCBC 2006)" and is to be provided for landslide assessments (not floods or flood controls) for the purposes of the Land Title Act, Community Charter or the Local Government Act. Italicized words are defined in the APEGBC Guidelines. To: The Approving Authority City of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place, V2X 6A9 Jurisdiction and address With reference to (check one): ~ Land Title Act (Section 86) -Subdivision Approval o Local Government Act (Sections 919.1 and 920) -Development Permit o Community Charter (Section 56) -Building Permit o Local Government Act (Section 910) -Flood Plain Bylaw Variance o Local Government Act (Section 910) -Flood Plain Bylaw Exemption Date: February 21, 2020 o British Columbia Building Code 2006 sentences 4.1.8.16 (8) and 9.4 4.4.(2) (Refer to BC Building and Safety Policy Branch Information Bulletin 810-01 issued January 18, 2010) For the Property: LT 185; DL 277; NWD; PL NWP40699 (20857 Golf Lane) The undersigned hereby gives assurance that he/she is a Qualified Professional and is a Professional Engineer or Professional Geoscientist. I have signed, sealed and dated, and thereby certified, the attached landslide assessment report on the Property in accordance with the APEGBC Guidelines. That report must be read in conjunction with this Statement. In preparing that report I have: Check to the left of applicable items v4. Collected and reviewed appropriate background information -~. Reviewed the proposed residential development on the Property A. Conducted field work on and, if required, beyond the Property /4. Reported on the results of the field work on and, if required, beyond the Property -------,~-:-eonsidered-any-changed-conditions-on-anct;-if-required;-beyond-the-Property----------------+-6. For a landslide hazard analysis or landslide risk analysis I have: ./6.1 reviewed and characterized, if appropriate, any landslide that may affect the Property ___012 estimated the landslide hazard A.3 identified existing and anticipated future elements at risk on and, if required, beyond the Property 44 estimated the potential consequences to those elements at risk 7. Where the Approving Authority has adopted a level of landslide safety I have: _7.1 compared the level of landslide safety adopted by the Approving Authority with the findings of my investigation _7.2 made a finding on the level of landslide safety on the Property based on the comparison _7.3 made recommendations to reduce landslide hazards and/or landslide risks 8. Where the Approving Authority has not adopted a level of landslide safety I have: ~.1 described the method of landslide hazard analysis or landslide risk analysis used /a.2 referred to an appropriate and identified provincial, national or international guideline for level of landslide safety APEGBC • Revised May 2010 Guidelines for Legislated Landslide Assessments 55 for Proposed Residential Development in British Columbia /8.3 compared this guideline with the findings of my investigation ./s.4 made a finding on the level of landslide safety on the Property based on the comparison /s.s made recommendations to reduce landslide hazards and/or landslide risks /9. Reported on the requirements for future inspections of the Property and recommended who should conduct those inspections. Based on my comparison between Check one o the findings from the investigation and the adopted level of landslide safety (item 7.2 above) ~ the appropriate and identified provincial, national or international guideline for level of landslide safety (item 8.4 above) I hereby give my assurance that, based on the conditions 1'' contained in the attached landslide assessment report, Check one ~-for subdivision approval, as required by the Land Title Act (Section 86), "that the land may be used safely for the use intended" Check one o ,,/ with one or more recommended registered covenants. liY" without any registered covenant. o for a development permit, as required by the Local Government Act (Sections 919.1 and 920), my report will "assist the local government in determining what conditions or requirements under [Section 920] subsection (7.1) it will impose in the permit". o for a building permit, as required by the Community Charter (Section 56), "the land may be used safely for the use intended" Check one o with one or more recommended registered covenants. o without any registered covenant. o for flood plain bylaw variance, as required by the "Flood Hazard Area Land Use Management Guidelines" associated with the Local Government Act (Section 910), "the development may occur safely". o for flood plain bylaw exemption, as required by the Local Government Act (Section 91 O), "the land may be used safely for the use intended". -----~-;_:_en-(P_~_i~_:;_P_._E_ng--~7~----· _____ :_:_!_ru_a_ry_2_1_. -20_2_0_ Signature bv-Unit 15. 20279 97th Avenue. Langley, BC. Vl M 4B9 Address (604) 882-8475 Telephone If the Qualified Professional is a member of a firm, complete the following. I am a member of the firm Valley Geotechnical Engineering Service Ltd. and I sign this letter on behalf of the firm. (Print name of firm) When seismic slope stability assessments are involved, level of landslide safety is considered to be a "life safety" criteria as described in the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC 2005), Commentary on Design for Seismic Effects in the User's Guide, Structural Commentaries, Part 4 of Division B. This states: "The primary objective of seismic design is to provide an acceptable level of safety for building occupants and the general public as the building responds to strong ground motion; in other words, to minimize loss of life. This implies that, although there will likely be extensive structural and non-structural damage, during the DGM (design ground motion), there is a reasonable degree of confidence that the building will not collapse nor will its attachments break off and fall on people near the building. This performance level is termed 'extensive damage' because, although the structure may be heavily damaged and may have lost a substantial amount of its initial strength and stiffness, it retains some margin of resistance against collapse". Guidelines for Legislated Landslide Assessments 56 APEGBC • Revised May 2010 for Proposed Residential Development in British Columbia 1~••• mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Third Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7533-2019; 21640 124 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: September 1, 2020 2018-498-RZ cow On May 26, 2020, Council passed a motion that this application at 21640 124 Avenue (Appendix A and B) be referred to staff for further discussion with the applicant after hearing representations at the May 19, 2020 Public Hearing. A modified proposal has been submitted, reducing the density by 25 percent from four (4) to three (3) dwelling units. Only one dwelling now faces the Manor Avenue cul-de-sac, in keeping with the character of this street. The project retains the courtyard between the one (1) dwelling unit building on Manor Avenue and the two (2) dwelling unit facing 124 Avenue. Therefore, the proposal continues to comply with the RT-2 (Ground Oriented Residential Infill) zone. If Council chooses to proceed to third reading, the terms and conditions need to be adjusted to add the registration of a restrictive covenant limiting the number of dwelling units to a maximum of three (3) and to adjust the Community Amenity Contribution requirement as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7533-2019 be given third reading; 2) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of ----------~th~e~d-ep-o~sit of a security, as outlined m the Agreement; ii) Road dedication on 124 Avenue as required; iii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; iv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management, including a maintenance guide; v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant limiting the number of dwelling units on the subject site to a maximum of three (3) dwelling units; vi) Removal of any existing buildings or structures; 1106 2018-498-RZ Page 1 of 5 vii) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site. viii) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $8,200 ($4,100.00 /unit based on 2 units) be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. DISCUSSION: 1) Background Context: Applicant: Ryan Huctman Legal Description: East 785 Feet Lot 2 Except Part in Plan LMP1615, District Lot 245 Group 1 NWD Plan 8586 OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Urban Residential Urban Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RT-2 (Ground Oriented Residential Infill) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential 1 East: Use: Residential j; Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) f: Designation: Urban Residential 1 West: Use: Residential 11 -------------~z_o~n~e_: ____ R~S_-_1 (One Famil}{ Urban Re_sklerrtial) ______________ --+-Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Residential Residential 988 sq. m. (0.24 acres) Manor Avenue and 124 Avenue Urban Standard 2) Background and Project Description: On May 26, 2020, following the Public Hearing held on May 19, Council passed a motion that this application at 21640 124 Avenue (Appendix A and B) be referred to staff for further discussion with the applicant. Most comments at the Public Hearing revolved around the traffic, parking and 2018-498-RZ Page 2 of 5 ! ! (., l=t pedestrian safety impacts and the character of the development. There was concern about the proposed density of four (4) dwelling units, and more particularly with having two (2) dwelling units facing Manor Avenue rather than one (1) dwelling unit to match the single residential dwellings around the rest of the cul-de-sac. Following discussion with the applicant, a revised proposal has been submitted showing a 25% reduction in density, from four (4) to three (3) dwelling units. There will be only one dwelling unit facing the Manor Avenue cul-de-sac, set back and designed more like a single residential dwelling, while retaining th-e-coortyard between the---two-propo-sed buildings-to-comply-with--the-reqoirements of--, the desired RT-2 (Ground Oriented Residential Infill) zone. The proposed RT-2 zone would permit the "Courtyard Residential" use which allows for two or more buildings with any combination of up to eight dwelling units. A comparison of the earlier and current site plan is shown below. 3flN3J\ V 1-i.J.vl '· Plan Presented at Public Hearing 2018-498-RZ 3f1N3/\ V H.lVi: l a: w o::, zZ <(w 5;;: Revised Plan (3 dwelling units) Page 3 of 5 Section 4 70 of the Local Government Act, permits, without further notice or hearing, an alteration decreasing the density with the owner's consent. This consent has been given by the owner and Council may granting third reading, based on the revised development proposal. If Council wishes to proceed to third reading, the conditions have been adjusted as follows: • To insure not more than three (3) dwelling units are constructed under the "Courtyard Residential" use, a Restrictive Covenant to this effect is to be registered on title; and • With the reduction of orie dwelling unit, the Community Amenity Contribution is reduced. With the credit in the policy for the first dwelling unit, the requirement becomes $8,200 (based on $4,100 for 2 units). 3) Planning Analysis: The more detailed analysis about this project, respecting OCP Policy, ADP review, DIM comments, Design Guidelines and Departmental comments are contained in the second reading report dated April 7, 2020 is attached as Appendix D for reference. The main changes between the previous and new proposal include the following: • The project continues to have two buildings. The building facing 124 Avenue resembles a duplex and the building facing Manor Avenue is a single family residential dwelling; • The single family residential dwelling facing Manor Avenue has both required parking spaces in a side-by-side garage and a longer driveway allowing for two more parking spaces; • The revised proposal has a larger courtyard space between the two buildings, thereby creating an improved open space for residents; • Although the variance is still required for the shape of the lot, other variances are reduced improving neighbourhood compatibility. The development variance permit application will be updated and the variances being sought will be described in the staff report that is presented to Council concurrently with final adoption; and • The development permit plan and landscaping will also be described more fully in the staff report required for issuance of a development permit for form and character that is presented to Council concurrently with final adoption. 2018-498-RZ Page 4 of 5 CONCLUSION: The applicant has reduced the proposed density by 25 percent to three (3) dwelling units with one dwelling unit facing Manor Avenue for improved compatibility with the existing single residential atmosphere on the cul-de-sac. Therefore, it is recommended that third reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7533-2019. "Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski" Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MSc, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP Planner "Original signed by Mark McMullen" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Al Horsman" Concurrence: Al Horsman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7533-2019 ------;ixppenaixD -Apnlr,2020 Report (withoUt Attachments) 2018-498-RZ Page 5 of 5 ~ ~ 12463 12443 ---12429 0) I'-.. lO .... I C\I (0 CX) I'-.. 0) LO LO .... .... C\I C\I 12371 12365 12357 12351 12343 .... LO --I.I=)-.... 12337 C\I ~ I) 12311 N Scale: 1 :1,500 APPENDIX A 21641~ I'-.. co I 12455 I (0 I~ .... i-.: 12444 C\I (/) co 125 AVE. .,.... N t,.c;) l\.'o <o~fJ., fJ., ri," 12434 12424 I/ I'-.. .... ("') ("') 'S:1-lO (0 (0 (0 .... .... .... ,...12414 I I I SUBJECT PR\E? 'S:1-C\I C) lO ("') cy; (0 (0 .... .... r,-C\I C\I C\I 12390 0) 12380 lO (0 12368 .... C\I ~ ,T ;'g \ (0 12358 .... C\I 12350 12342 .... lO lO lO ~ ~--'S:1--~ ~ ·co-.... .... .... C\I C\I C\I C\I (0 (0 (0 (0 .... ("') 'S:1-lO (0 (0 (0 (0 .... .... .... .... C\I C\I C\I C\I Legend ---Ditch Centreline ~ ~ C\I C\I 'S:1-0) .... ~ C\I (0 (0 (0 I'-.. (0 .... .... .... .... .... (0 C\I C\I C\I C\I _C\I .... C\I ("') R 2 ("') 8 I'-.. (0 0) .... (0 (0 (0 (0 I'-.. I'-.. .... .... .... .... .... .... C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I 124 AVE. 12395 ~ C\I ~ 0) (0 (0 .... .... C\I C\I i-.: (/) (/) __) z :3; .... .... co 0) UJ (0 (0 .... .... C\I C\I MANOR AVE. 'S:1-(0 (0 .... C\I ~ (0 .... C\I 123 ---(0 (0 (0 .... C\I 'S:1-'S:1-'S:1-I'-.. co 0) (0 (0 <o .... .... .... C\I C\I C\I I~ I~ I'-.. ~ 0) (0 (0 (0 I'-.. .... .... .... .... C\I C\I C\I C\I AVE. (0 I'-.. (0 .... C\I ----· --(0 'S:1-'S:1-co 0) C) (0 (0 I'-.. .... .... .... C\I C\I C\I 21640 124 Ave PIO 011-363-797 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ I'-.. .... C\I 1~•-mapleridge.ca -co .... I'-.. .... C\I I'-.. -I'-.. .... C\I 'S:1-.... I'-.. .... C\I FILE: 2018-498-DP DATE: May 21, 2019 BY: MC -II I~ C\I ~ .... C\I . i' I -i i i r i r f l f ~ ''-e r I~. I i r I I I I 1-I' Scale: 1: 1,500 APPENDIX 8 21640 124 Ave PIO 011-363-797 PLANNING DEPARTMENT mapleridge.ca FILE: 2018-498-DP DATE: May 21, 2019 BY: MC I i l I l= CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7533-2019 APPENDIX C A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7533-2019." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: East 72 feet Lot 2, Except Part in Plan LMP16156, District Lot 245 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 8586 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1791 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RT-2 (Ground Oriented Residential Infill). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 19th day of March, 2019. READ a second time the 14th day of April, 2020. PUBLIC HEARING held the 19th day of May, 2020. READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER ,20 CORPORATE OFFICER ---,--1 I I L I L k [ f 0 0) ;g 6 0.. u al ~-¥':=--:=? -SPRING AVE. 0 ~ 215 st "' I'--co 216 st 12470 a. P 2 796 "' O> 213 ~ "' 214 12469 co201 t--0 12463 "' a.200 12443 47 12429 6488 42 43 44 45 7 "' " O> 0, :2 "' '" ~ "' "' "' ~ ~ ;:; "' "' "' ;:; 46 -"' " "' " "' "' " ~ "' ~ "' <o 0, ;:; "' ~ ~ "' "' ;:; "' "' ;:; 214 215 216 217 121 Rem 3 2 P621 40 218 12371 ;; co EPP?9085. _ 0 P13 00 Q) I 12tl65 ~ ~-" "' 2 "' Q) ~ 1~5~ 00 a. '.:" EPP 29999 I'--N a. ----0.. UJ 3. --.,,-EPP 2908 Th 12351 P17 43 P 18 25 P 72245 13 12 11 21 20 A 2 12343 " 0) " ;;: 0) ;; P 72950 "' 0) 0) ~ "' ~ ~ ~ "' ;:; ;:; B "' "' "' "' 12337 LMP 32554 <o 0 0 0 "' 0 ' "' '" " "' <o " ~ "' ~ "' ~ "' Rem 17 ;:; ;:; ;:; "' "' "' 12311 8 7 6 5 4 15 p 1 ~494 16 p 181 )99 1789! P 20197 -41 I'--"' 33 34 36 37 12297 (0 35 0 39 {") "' " "' "' ~ ;;; Rem 0.. ~ @ ;)i "' " ~ ~ ~ ~ 40 :;; ;:; _J "' "' "' "' "' SPRING GRES. .. 0 st ~ ~ "' LO ~ ~ "' ;:; co 69 ~ 68 67 P 26514 12464 L 136 PL. 33418 ,-; 12444 (/) 246 <O ;;; st " " "' § 140 ~ "' "' 125 AVE. 137 21641 co st IW st a.245 "' "' ~ "' 0, <o <o " ;:; -----"' "' 12434 151 150 244 P 334 8 12424 st ~ m N E "' Q) "0 <1) ~~ 0::: 8 ~ '" 0 0 P 33 18 P 2 390 3 ~ 156 157 5 6 7 0.. a. ~ :::: :;; 12414 "' "' _J 141 12455 " 8 "' 149 148 147 LMf 52071 9 A 8 " 0, :::: 8 "' "' 146 12 143 ,-; (/) ,-.. ;;; co st "' 144"' a. 1<15 12424 14~ "' LMP liliiiia LMP18351 LMP 16440 , , LMI;., 224 124 AVE. LMP 18319 LMP 18021 Lfl& 1Q931 co LMP 1846 LMP 18022 LMP 18392 P17760 "' ~ o <0 RerB § o N "' C.O N t-,.. :2 12390 U ~ ~ UJ 5 P40867 E~ LO E o:: "ONE" o:::<ll a. co <1l 12380 a. 0::: g ~~ 123~ ~;: ~ ~ ~ ~ I 204 ;g d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c 'EgJ E ~~~~~~ lin co~ 1 ~12~~~ ;:;;:;;:; , ~~ 8l ~ ~ 0::: a. 0::: a. ~ ~ 1 I LMF 5561 Rem' "' "' ~ P43 99 fu ~~ 3 I A B 161 ~ 181sta. ~ ?Ji 182 § 183 1 Rem ;:;~111° NI~ ' / -12368 194 ... ~ "' I 205 4~ ~---(;< LMP25 A 624 co I co " p 748~ ~ MANOR AVE. LMP46218 21123st ~ ;1; ~ I'---<> 195 • '7--" " .. " -21124 _J N 2 "' I 123581f2:\17~eo",• \:"!188~187~186~185 ~~"' ~~ a. P4 f----,->---1 ~ ri,. "'o C\I "' "' "' 1 ~ ~ 2 ;::_ ~ -l :3 0:: u> 'l-196 ;:; 3 ;:; 6 12350 2UJ P 43491 LMP 340, 9 12342 1 o P 33 50 P3 150 143 Rem 1 ~ 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 "'153 co "' "' "' ~ P 293 ~2 LO :g "' "' " "' " "' 12 ;i; "' " ., O> ~ ~ ~ ;:; a. <o <o <o <o ~ ;:; ;:; ;:; ;:; ;:; ;:; ;:; "' "' "' 123 AVE. \EP346~ -.I. ~ , <o <o <o Rem . .; <o <o <o <o " . , "~ '" ; :g :2 ~ "' O> I'--;:; ~ <o <o ~ ~ ~ ~ T:i 9',? N 127 "' "' ;:; ;:; ;:; ;:; aP32671 C'\I (\I (\I "---1, 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 ;:; ~ p {") 1 ~RP15478 p 13300' • 138 139 -' 12314 P 331 04 F P19818 ,\w: EPP 5205 P 15642 P14 1796 12292 1 2 E 12 13 14 15 17 ,-; 12282 16 (/) ':i " "' "' " co 2 ., " ;;; ;; '" ;:: <O "' ~ O> 0 ~ <o ,:2' l's--'°· ~ ~ " :::: " " :::: :::: ;;; "' ;:; ;:; ;:; ;:; "' "' "' "' MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia 7533-2019 1791 RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential RT-2 (Ground Oriented Residential Infill) 6 N SCALE 1 :2,500 E-------i I/ t... .... British Columbia iiitiilidi·Ni mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7533-2019; 21640 124 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: APPENDIX D April 7, 2020 2018-498-RZ cow On November 5, 2019, Council resolved that this application to rezone the subject property located at 21640 124 Avenue (Appendix A and B) from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-2 (Ground-Oriented Residential Infill) for a four (4) unit Courtyard Housing project, "be referred back to staff for further work with the applicant relative to parking and density options." The applicant has submitted revised plans (Appendix D) that have modified the parking and landscaping components of the project, while retaining the same four (4) unit Courtyard Housing design. The size of the parking spaces and perimeter landscaping were both expanded to address Council's concerns. The November 5, 2019 report to Council (Appendix E) considered this project from two perspectives. The Development Information Meeting (DIM) on June 26, 2019 and compliance with the interim Multiplex Design Guidelines together with the applicable Multi Residential Development Permit Area Guidelines. The DIM comments were related to the project being too dense, not fitting into the neighbourhood and perceived safety and traffic fears. The form and character of the project was considered as a work in progress with a report and finalized plans being forwarded to Council for issuance of a Development Permit. This application is in compliance with the OCP with respect to use and density. . f i ~------~uts_uanLtn_C.o_unciLp_olLc_y.,_1his_ap_pli_e.atioJLis_Sllbj_e_cLto_ihe_C.ommuoity_Amenity_C.ontr.ihutLo..~-----+-Program at a rate of $4,100.00 per dwelling unit, with the first of the four (4) units being exempted, for an estimated amount of $12,300.00. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7533-2019 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii) Road dedication on 124 Avenue as required; 2018-498-RZ Page i of 6 iii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; iv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management, including a maintenance guide; v) Removal of any existing buildings or structures; vi) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site. vii) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $12,300 ($4,100.00 /unit based on 3 units) be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. DISCUSSION: 1) Background Context: Applicant: Ryan Huctman Legal Description: East 785 Feet Lot 2 Except Part in Plan LMP1615, District Lot 245 Group 1 NWD Plan 8586 OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Urban Residential Urban Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RT-2 (Ground Oriented Residential Infill) ' ' I i I ~~ r-::--, i-i l ~ I 1~~ f<; t-i 1~-Surrounding Uses: f'' North: ~~~~: ~;~~d~n~:~amily Urban Residential)! 1._s --------------t-tes-igAatie-rr.--------1:Jr-b-aFrR-es-ideflt-i-ai-l --~-------------------+--South: Use: Residential !11,:_~ Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Residential I Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) 11 Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Residential j Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) , Existing Use of Prope::signation: ~~:~;e:::ildential II Proposed Use of Property: Residential Site Area: 988 sq. m. (0.24 acres) Access: Manor Avenue and 124 Avenue Servicing requirement: Urban Standard 2018-498-RZ Page 2 of 6 2) Background: On November 5, 2019, Council resolved that this application to rezone the subject property located at 21640 124 Avenue (Appendix A and B) from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-2 (Ground Oriented Residential Infill) for a four (4) unit Courtyard Housing project, "be referred back to staff for further work with the applicant relative to parking and density options." 3) Project Description: The proposal for the subject property at 21640 124 Avenue is for an infill development of four (4) dwelling units, in two (2) buildings, designed in the form of Courtyard Housing (Appendix E). The project includes three (3) bedroom units, with basement area. The size of the units are essentially the same as the earlier submission consisting of two (2) units of 202 square metres (2,175 square feet) each and two (2) of 188 square metres (2,024 square feet) each. The changes since the November 5, 2019 submission include: • There now is a landscaping strip between the fence and car parking spaces. The alternative is to place a hedge toward the street with the fence behind it; • Each unit has a longer and wider garage. • The building facing 124 Avenue has two single garage doors rather than one double garage door; • The buildings have been shifted closer together to increase the landscaping and the size of the unenclosed parking spaces, particularly for the building on 124 Avenue. Consequently, the Courtyard has been reduced from about 8.4 to about 7.5 metres in depth. 4) Planning Analysis: i) Official Community Plan: The development site is designated Urban Residential Major Corridor, which is appropriate for the proposal. The proposal, as modified, continues to adhere to applicable OCP policies as described in the November 5, 2019 report and summarized below. A number of OCP Infill Policies apply to this site and are evaluated with respect to the proposal's design as follows: • In changing the single family resi ential to a Courtyard Housing form, Policy 3-19-b sets the criteria with respect to achieving street-oriented buildings, including developing a design "that resemble a single detached dwelling, with an emphasis on orientation to the street." Design comments include strengthening the prominence of the front entrances facing 124 and Manor Avenues, and additional front fa9ade articulation and detailing for both proposed buildings to "read" more like single residential buildings from both Manor Avenue and 124 Avenue. This will be achieved through the development permit process. • Policy 3-21 requires attention be paid to having site plans, setbacks and building massing that respects existing development patterns and are sensitive to the surrounding neighbourhood. 2018-498-RZ Page 3 of 6 l l r i I_ re I: 1-~ ~ -i= 1--1 ! I i I I Design comments include added attention to the massing along the interior side lot lines to be more sensitive to the existing single residential dwellings on abutting lands. This would include the steeping down the massing to the interior lot lines. The proposed buildings do comply with the 9.5 metre maximum height requirement. Single residential zones allow for taller buildings (11 metres); however, there are one or 11/2 storey homes along Manor Avenue. This will be achieved through the development permit process. The overall OCP objective is to encourage growth within the Urban Area Boundary (UAB), including growth through infill by a m"ix of housing types and tenures (Policy 3-1). This is achieved by the increased density being proposed. ii) Zoning Bylaw: The analysis of compliance does not change from the November 5, 2019 proposal. All variances to accommodate the existing lot and proposed setbacks as described in the November 5, 2019 report are unchanged, except that the proposed front yard setback to 124 Avenue is increased from 6.0 metres in the previous proposal to 6.68 metres in the revised proposal. iii) Off-Street Parking And Loading Bylaw: The project continues to provide eight (8) parking spaces, which is double the bylaw requirement. iv) Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses and achives the interim multiplex Design Guidelines. The following is a preliminary analysis, applying the interim guidelines contained in the "Proposed Triplex, Fourplex and Courtyard Housing Forms Preliminary Overview Report" evaluating the form and character of proposed Courtyard Housing project." Guideline Staff Comment .-Nut-a-rowhoase-form. More-front-f-a9ade-a-rticulati-on-and prominence to the front facing entrance area will achieve full compliance. • Dwelling units may be located in more Two dwellings are located in each of the two than one building on a lot. buildings. • Orientation is characterized by units Inward facing orientation with direct access that are facing inwards towards each off the patios into the courtyard and other. overlook from living spaces (kitchen) is provided. • Pedestrian walkways lead from the This is provided. street to an inner courtyard area. • Courtyards are programmed for flexible This will be addressed through the and interactive outdoor space but are development permit process. A gaz~bo is not intended for parking. being proposed. • Where lane access is available, parking Not applicable. . 2018-498-RZ Page 4 of 6 ' ' ' l ~ will be located at the rear of the property. • Scale and massing shall be compatible Discussed in the OCP Policy section above. with the surrounding area. • Mix of unit sizes. '-Two units have 202 square metres and two have 188 square metres of floor space. A detailed description of the Rroject's form and character will be included in a future De_y_elopment Permit report to Council. v) Advisory Design Panel: This application predates the requirement for such projects to be submitted to the Advisory Design Panel. Therefore, the review was undertaken by staff based on the Courtyard Housing Project Interim Guidelines noted in the table in the previous section. Depending on the matters outlined in the Alternatives section, a referral to ADP could be required by Council in the instance of finalizing the design of this project. vi) Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting (DIM) that was held at Maple Ridge Secondary School Library on June 26th, 2019. There were 18 people in attendance at the meeting. A summary of the main comments and discussions with the attendees was provided by the applicant. The public's comments focused on the following four (4) issues as described in more detail in Appendix E. A summary of the applicant's report is as follows: • Residents felt a rezoning to multi-residential was sudden and unexpected, with concerns being expressed about rental and safety during construction; • Residents perceived that there would be parking, traffic and pedestrian safety problems; • Residents expressed concerns with the way higher density could affect the character of their neighbourhood, greenery and views. They asked if an impact assessment has or could be done by the City. The DIM meeting notes are included to the November 5, 2019 staff report (Attachment E). 5) Interdepartmental Implications: The modified proposal did not require another interdepartmental review. The comments contained in the November 5, 2019 report continue to apply. 6) Alternatives: There are two alternatives that Council may wish to consider: 1. Council may wish to deny this application; or 2. Council may wish to forward this application to staff to pursue a different type of infill design with the applicant, such as: a triplex or duplex as a way of achieving an infill project with some increase in density. 2018-498-RZ Page 5 of 6 n-;...-.-----~~ I I I I : I -+ l : f I ! : i f ~ : f I I ! i With Alternative No. 2, a new Development Information Meeting would be required to re-engage the neighourhood and explain how resident's concerns are being alleviated. CONCLUSION: Following discussions with the applicant after this application was referred to staff, the applicant has modified the project with respect to parking issues raised by Council. It remains the preference of the client to proceed with a four (4) unit Courtyard Housing Project. As the project proceeds forward, staff will work with the applicant to finalize a design to be closer to conformity with applica~ guidelines and ensuring sensitive infill and landscaping buffers are achieved. These details will be available to Council in a future Development Permit report. It is recommended that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7533-2019, and that application 2018-498-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. "Original signed by Mark McMullen" for Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP Planner II "Original signed by Chuck Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Al Horsman" Concurrence: Al Horsman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7533-2019 Appendix D -Revised Site Plan Appendix E -November 5, 2019 CoW Report 2018-498-RZ Page 6 of 6 TO: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: FILE NO: I~~-September 1, 2020 2017-489-DVP 2017-489-DP FROM_: __ SUBJECT: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Development Variance Permit and Development Permit 11903 and 11917 Burnett Street cow EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Development Variance Permit application (2017-489-DVP) has been received in conjunction with a Multi-Family Development Permit application (2017-489-DP) to permit the future construction of a five storey residential building with 54 apartment units (Appendix C), at 11903 and 11917 Burnett Street (Appendix A and 8). The requested variances (Appendix D) are to Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as follows: Part 6, Section 604, 6 a) • to reduce the front yard setback from 7.5 metres to 6.0 metres to the east front deck wall; • to reduce the rear yard setback from 7.5 metres to 6.68 metres to the west building face; • to reduce the rear yard setback from 7.5 metres to 5.3 metres to the west deck wall; and • to reduce the side yard setback from 7.5 metres to 5.8 metres to the north deck wall. Part 6, Section 604, 7 a) • to increase the maximum building storeys from 4 to 5 storeys; • to increase the maximum building height from 15 metres to 18.34 metres; and • to increase the maximum building height from 15 metres to 23.77 metres to the elevator roof parapert. ' ' ,-,_ k-· [ l ~--f'-[ r-t=, ~=--~ E'-t ------+A-e-reQt.1e-st-eGl-val"iaAGe-to-{Append-i-X-D}-Maple-Ricige-Off=Street-~k-i-Ag-@Aci-Lo@diAg-By~aw-1',Jo-.-435_.,_,-~-------~: 1990 is as follows: l' Section 10.2 • to reduce the minimum visitor parking spaces required from 6 spaces to 5 spaces. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2017-489-DVP and Development Permit 2017-489-DP be approved. Council considered rezoning application 2017-489-RZ and granted first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7 407-2017 on January 16, 2018. Council granted second reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7 407-2017 on July 9, 2019. This application was presented at Public Hearing on September 17, 2019, and Council granted third reading on October 1, 2019. Council will be considering final reading for rezoning application 2017-489-RZ on September 8, 2020. 1107 2017-489-DP Page 1 of 8 i::-i~ f: f~= rt F~ -i::: [~~ k 1-t r '?---RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-489-DVP respecting property located at 11903 and 11917 Burnett Street; and 2. That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-489-DP respecting property located at 11903 and 11917 Burnett Street. DISCtJSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: -------------~e=si,gnation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Project Description: Krahn Engineering Ltd, Wayne Venebles Lot 6 and 7, Section 17, Township 12, NWP22046 Low-Rise Apartment No change RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Apartments RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Low-Rise Apartment Apartments RM-2 Low-Rise Apartment Single Family Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Apartments and vacant RM-2 and RM-6 (Regional Town Centre High Density Apartment Residential) Low-Rise Apartment, and Medium and High-Rise A artment Single Family Residential Apartment 0.267 ha (0.661 acres) Burnett Street Urban Standard The applicant has applied to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential). The proposed development will consist of approxinatley 54 residential units with a density of 1.61 FSR with the front of the building facing onto Burnett Street. The parking will be accommodated in an underground parkade. The proposal 2017-489-DP Page 2 of 8 ' __ i includes a roof top ammenity space as well as an outdoor amenity space located at the south-west corner of the development site (Appendix F and G). c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan Pursuant to Section 8.11 Town Centre Development Permit Area Guidelines of the Official ---communityPlan (OCP)-;-a Town Centre Development Permit forthe Downtown East Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan is required for all new multi-family development on land designated Low-Rise Apartment on Schedule 1. The Downtown East Precinct serves as the eastern interface and gateway to the Town Centre. More urban and pedestrian oriented development is desired in the Downtown East Precinct, which can include medium to high density residential high-rise towers. This project, a mid-rise residential building, conforms with the intent of the precinct guidelines of the Town Centre Area Plan. The Low-Rise Apartment designation is intended for development in a three (3) to five (5) storey apartment form where units are accessed from an internal corridor and residential parking is provided underground. The proposed development parking will be located within an underground parkade (Appendix E). The following Town Centre Area Plan policies apply to this proposal: 3-1 An increase in residential and commercial density is encouraged in the Town Centre, particularly within the Central Business District... Land-use should include a mix of housing types catering to various demographics, including affordable and special needs housing, within walking distance to a broad mixture of uses, including shops, services, cultural facilities, and recreation. This project will increase the number of condominium units within walking distance to a range of shops, services, and transit in and around the Central Business District. 3-12 High density development that is four or more storeys in height may be required to include a shadow study in consideration of adjacent sites to address potential impacts on available daylight. Consideration should a/so be given to the privacy of residents in existing buildings. This project will be five storeys in height, but situated among four-storey, low rise apartments to its ______ nortb,_wesLand_sQU.tb_and_a r_o_w_of_slogle_tamily___ill)_m__es across Burnett Street to its east. Based on policy 3-12 above the applicant has provided a shadow study. 3-15 Concealed parking structures are encouraged in all commercial, mixed-use, multi-family uses... in the Town Centre. Below grade parking structures are particularly encouraged for Low-Rise, Medium, and High-Rise Apartment...buildings. This project includes an underground parking garage in compliance with this policy. 3-22 All Low-Rise Apartment developments should be a minimum of three (3) storeys and a maximum of five (5) storeys in height. This project complies with the height range envisioned by the policy. 2017-489-DP Page 3 of 8 -·· -..:. I ' '. In addition to these policies, a range of environmentally sustainable policies in the Town Centre Area Plan also apply to this application: 2-5 Incorporating Rainwater Management practices into on-site and off-site development will be encouraged[ .. .]. Some examples of Rainwater Management practices include: • bioretention areas; • rainwater gardens; • bioswales; • landscaped curb bulges on street right-of-ways; • rainwater harvest for irrigation; and • green roofs. 2-9 The use of plant and tree species that are suited for Maple Ridge climate and that will attract local songbirds and pollinating insects species [ ... ] will be encouraged in public and private development; 2-10 Landscaping, as described in policy 2-9 above, will be encouraged in all public and private outdoor spaces in the Town Centre. For areas with a large amount of paved surfaces, such as surface parking lots and public plazas, the installation of trees, rain gardens, raised planters, and/or living green walls, where feasible, is encouraged to provide some areas of refuge for wildlife, such as small birds, rainwater interception, cooling in summer months, reduced glare from pavement, carbon sequestration, and a more attractive urban environment. This project has a variety of trees, shrubs, perennials and ornamental grasses proposed for the project to create a layered landscape inside the site and at the perimeter of the site and the building. The variety includes species, which will encourage wildlife to inhabit the shrubs and trees and provide seeds and fruit, as well as provide flowers for bees, insects and butterflies. There is fairly dense tree planting and it will provide shade for cooling and reduce paving glare. All of the planting will assist with rainwater retention and interception, carbon retention and it will create an inviting atmosphere which will encourage people to sit outside and relax. The plants are mainly located in planters and adjacent to walls. d) Variance Analysis: Tl"ie Z:on i ng-Bylcrw-esta-btish-e-s-genernl-minimurrra nd,naximum,e-gulatrons-f or-stn-gte-fami1r,mult·-fa mi ly and commercial developments. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility to vary these regulations in the approval process. The requested variances and rational for support are described below. Zoning Bylaw The proposed reductions to the Zoning Bylaw have been requested to improve the overall design of the building to increase its relationship with the public realm and the emerging character of the area; therefore, the proposed variances are supportable. The proposed reduction to the front lot line setback has been requested to facilitate an increased presence of balconies along the front of the building; this variance has been requested to offset the narrow face of the building that is a result of the lots narrow nature. With this variance, the building will have additional articulation and visual .interest facing the public realm. 2017-489-DP Page 4 of 8 I-I Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, Part 6, Section 604, 6 a) is varied: • to reduce the front yard setback from 7.5 metres to 6.0 metres to the east front deck wall; The proposed reduction to the rear and side yard setback is to facilitate an increase in the size of balconies and increase the aesthetic value of the building. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, Part 6, Section 604, 6 a) is varied: • to reduce the rear yard setback from 7.5 metres to 6.68m to the west building face; • to reduce the rear yard setback from 7.5 metres to 5.3 metres to the west deck wall; and • to reduce the side yard setback from 7.5 metres to 5.8 metres to the north deck wall. The proposed RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone for the subject property is supported through the Town Centre policies for the area that support three (3) to five (5) storey residential structures; therefore the increase in building storeys and height can be supported. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985, Part 6, Section 604, 7 a) is varied: • to increase the maximum building storeys from 4 to 5 storeys; • to increase the maximum building height from 15 metres to 18.34 metres; and • to increase the maximum building height from 15 metres to 23.77 metres to the elevator roof para pet. Parking and Loading Bylaw The proposed reduction to the visitor parking requirement can be supported as the reduction of one space is small; to increase the number of parking spaces would impact the ramp to the underground parking. Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990, Section 10.2 is varied: • to reduce the minimum visitor parking spaces required from 6 spaces to 5 spaces. e) Advisory Design Panel The Advisory Design Panel (ADP) reviewed the form and character and the landscaping plans for the multi-family building at a meeting held on January 16, 2019. Following presentations by the project Architect and landscape Architect, the ADP made the following resolution in italics. The project Architect and landscape Architect have responded to each resolution item in quoted replies below. The File No. 2017-489-DP be supported and the following concerns be addressed as the design develops and submitted to Planning staff for follow-up: Landscape Comments: 1. Improving the pedestrian environment, safety and privacy: 2017-489-DP Page 5 of 8 • Consider improving design and functionality of amenity space on ground floor for both CPTED (in part due to dead end pedestrian path) and usability of space to improve visibility and circulation. "Response: path has been incorporated north of ramp area, play area has been expanded to fit play equipment." • Confirm that surface parking stalls have adequate maneuvering space without conflicting with the ramp. "Response: Parking surfaces stall have adequate maneuvering space without conflict with the ramp." • Incorporate a path to the north of ramp area. "Response: Path has been incorporated north of ramp area." • Provide a water source and tool storage near community garden plots. "Response: A water source and tool storage near community garden plots has been incorporated." • Where benches are adjacent to'guardrails, ensure railing height is code compliant. "Response: Handrails will have adequate height where adjacent to benches." • Coordinate the openings to the private patios with architecture. "Response: Openings have been coordinated" 2. Landscaping enhancements • Check for adequate soil depth in all planters. "Response: Planter heights have been adjusted to have adequate soil depth. Tree species specified in palters are of a smaller size and will not be inhibited by soil depth." • Consider inc?rporating additional planting to wildflower seed mix area in rooftop ------------area-a--.---------------------"Response: Wildflower seed mix has been changed to include only perennials to ensure long lasting growth and blooms." • If stepping stones are required, consider replacing trees with columnar solid hedge. "Response: Trees will remain to enhance site vegetation, provide vertical scale and barrier. The species has been changed to reflect a narrower branching habitat. This will be lower maintenance than a hedge and provide more room to walk." Architectural Comments: 1. Form and Character enhancement and additional details. • Reconsider proportions of stone relative to street scale. 2017-489-DP Page 6 of 8 "Stone cladding proportions were adjusted by the integration of 'Autumn' Hardie Panel vertical siding between the windows." • Review and ensure all material returns on all elevations are consistent. "Response: Materials returns on all elevations are now consistent." • Consider softening the entryway soffit material and improve lighting. "Response: Consideration will be given to the design of the soffit and to provide appropriate lighting." • Review the proportions on all exterior box frames. "Response: The vertical and horizontal projections that wind their way across the elevations of the building were adjusted in width to provide a visual consistency in their proportions." • Be consistent in materials for patio guardrails. "Response: Guardrail material consistency is in place." 2. Pedestrian environment and safety • Reconfigure the ground level visitor parking and circulation to soften the entry. "Response: The visitor parking spaces were moved south to the edge of the drive aisle and a landscape strip was introduced between the parking spaces and the sidewalk." • Provide a curb and elevation change between parking stalls and pedestrian walkway to better protect pedestrian at the entry; provide a curb letdown for more convenient access to the accessible stall. "Response: The sidewalk and landscape strip provide the elevation change requested between the visitor parking stalls and the pedestrian walkway. A letdown is provided within the sidewalk to provide access from the accessible stall." --------c1-. CoGr:ciiA@tiOA-Of-plei-AS,----------------• Coordinate between architect and landscape architect disciplines and their depiction in plans ie: landscape furniture "Response: Architectural and Landscape plans are coordinated and show similar layouts." f) Financial Implications: In accordance with Council's Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of the estimated landscape cost will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on an estimated landscape cost, the security will be $169,788.15. 2017-489-DP Page 7 of 8 i r-~ r--[_ f I I :-:-!.-:-! : g) Citizen Implications: In accordance with the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 notice of Council consideration of a resolution to issue a Development Variance Permit was mailed to all owners or tenants in occupations of all parcels, any parts of which are adjacent to the property that is subject to the permit. CONCLUSION: This Development Permit for the Downtown East Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan and Development Variance Permit is for a 54-unit residential apartment development, located at 11903 and 11917 Burnett Street. Staff have reviewed the proposal and are satisfied that it complies with the Development Permit Area Guidelines for the Downtown East Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan of the OCP for form and character. The proposed variances can be supported as they support the design elements of the building and the increase in height is keeping with the developing building form in the Town Centre in addition the OCP supports the height; therefore, recommended that this application be approved. It is recommended that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-489-DVP and 2017-489-DP respecting the subject properties located at 11903 and 11917 Burnett Street. "Original signed by Wendy Cooper" Prepared by: Wendy Cooper, MSc., MCIP,RPP Planner "Original signed by Mark McMullen" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "eriginal-srgrrect-by-AI Horsma Concurrence: Al Horsman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Appendix C -Site Plan Appendix D -Requested Variances Letter with plan showing variances Appendix E -Architect's Development Data Sheet Appendix F -Architect's Elevations Appendix G -Landscape Plans 2017-489-DP Page 8 of 8 ,-_ ,-f I ,-,- _....,. __ _ ~ . I N / ~ APPENDIX A "I" ~ ~ ~ ~ ; J: ~ co ~ co c!; ..... ~ ~ I 0, 0, 0, ~ 0, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 11969 i-: ' en I= w z I 11954 0::: :, 11963 ~BJECT PROPERTIES I;, ~ gi ..... ~ ~ '"" 11953 0, 0, 0, 0, ~ ~·~vv I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,, I FULLER AVE. 'J I ' 11940 ' I ~ ~ ,, ! ~ 0, ~I 11920 ~ [I I 11940 l I 11932 11931 r 11930 11931 I 11935 ' ' 11922 11921 11921 11907 11920 ! 11917 11912 11911 11900 11910 11911 I ii 11903 i ~ 11902 11901 i 11900 11901 f 11898 11891 c i-: 11890 11891 I en "' 11887 11888 11881 "' "' 11880 11881 I 11878 11871 \-11830 11868 11869 11851 11868 11861 I I 11856 11857 I 11858 11851 I 11843 11844 11845 11848 11841 i-: ~ i-: en en .J». 1182, I-11837 "' 11838 1183 F I-11836 "' w ~ z tl 0::: :, 11826 1182 CD 11824 11825 ~--C 11818 11811 r-: 11816 11817 1·1 ;---.....__ ~t ,~ ' ~ 11903 & 11917 Burnett St r-;: Legend ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1:::-Stream I ~·-·· ---Indefinite Creek 1-~ --,~ N -River mapleridge.ca -Major Rivers & Lakes 2017-489-DP Scale: 1 :2,000 DATE: Oct 26, 2017 BY:JV ' ,_ R- N Scale: 1 :2,000 Legend ---Stream Indefinite Creek -River _··_[ -Major Rivers & Lakes APPENDIX 8 11903 & 11917 Burnett St PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~·-· 2017-489-DP DATE: Oct 26, 2017 mapleridge.ca BY:JV r -x-:-,...,.-:----,..--1 i lo umooR AMENrrY"AAEAJ , I ~s ,f. [88 ~9 s.m:j _ 1 ' . • i , tsEE _JINIJSCAPEUNGSl I. I I ~I :wm1 r '~- ~1·· "! ~ RA MP DCM'N ~ "- { , ..... '""' ~ . ; '' ,'.'I.• ,"'\'"1:'I .-r 'lr '1', :~"' ""·T1V,l.1: ·,,> 1. I' ,. _ ~IE ~?::. _ P.. AMENITY -;.;;;;. 1---, I I 1.. ~ • L'>.9 IUU.2J2HlHEEXlf (i P£RUfTttD 1HROUGII ~; TIIAVEL~~ ·i_ (1~MAX.Al.1DWS)) LQBBY .. I ' , r:LWE<HOOF~~ 1-1 ~ 1 , i , r I -• , • 0 . ' __ o---f ----· -. _., .. ·--· --'··-·-, --·-.. ~ 'T"'.· '"' ... -.,,,;,,:, ..... -.. --.---·'"'-..... -·--·--------,·' ',----, .... G> ! .... ,,, .... .... G> C .. :I m )> ""C ""C m z 0 x ("') ---------'.!I j:l larry podhora I architecture inc City of Maple Ridge Planning-Department 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC Attention: Ms. Wendy Cooper, Planner APPENDIX D August 13, 2020 170464 Re: Summary of Bylaw Variances Request-2017-489-DP/DVP-11903 & 11917 Burnett St. As part of the above referenced application, the developer is requesting variances for building height, property line setbacks and 1 visitor parking space as shown on submitted drawing A 1.1. HEIGHT: The proposed RM-2 zone for this location is based on changes that the City is introducing to its OCP in the neighbourhood to density the new residential developments by allowing 5+ storeys which naturally results in an increase in building height. SETBACKS: The north setback variance request is only for portions of the proposed balconies. This marginal reduction of approx. 2m is rationalized by recognizing that the adjacent property to the north includes an amenity walkway as well as a circulation setback to the project's UG ramp thereby ensuring a significant separation between the buildings. l i I f_ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . ' ' I= f. l ! i i l I t l I I I !· ~ l ~ I ----------he-Fearand-frent-setbaeks-varianees-are-ag-aiA-fef-bateerty-prejeetiens-enly-.-They-affeet-the-----------narrow faces of the building (which mitigates their scalar impact on the two frontages). As well, these building frontages are designed with significant massing modulation and relief. While the balconies do project outward, much of the remainder of these elevations is moved well back of the Bylaw setback lines. . I · 1952 brackman way, north saanich, b.c., v91 Oc2 larry podhora I architecture inc PARKING: 5 visitor parking spaces are proposed at grade near the entrance to the building. These spaces are covered and include an accessible parking space as well as a small area at the top UG ramp for backing out. The length of the UG ramp does not allow for a 5th visitor parking space required per the Building Bylaw unless the amenity area and landscaping along Burnett are reduced. We are therefore requesting a variance to allow for a reduction otone visitor parking space. The secure UG resident parking spaces are clearly separated from the visitor parking spaces which are all co-located on grade only. I thrust this is the information you require, please do not hesitate to contact me should additional information be needed. 1952 brackman way, north saanich, b.c., v91 Oc2 I ' ' ' ' '-' I i J I i 5 I I e @ ~: ii ==-i 4---+ -! fEl«::EIIJCIOA.TE (&LNCl&:N'ECW.'MNO!) <-I I 11.1,. I ---t--~~~-- 1 ~I ~ -~ r-------, r-------J I r-------.., 1 I L_.J L--..l I -, APPROXIMATE l,'(>CATION OF EXISTING CONDO I ~1,,,=.,,::·.~;~i:::·,1;,~;,,,.I ,; '·" .. ,1, 1r .. ,. 1%N APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ORIVEWAY PROJECT NORTH ~,,,,.------il ... ct:r ·: :·.,(,.;_J~:~EJ39TH3PIO'E!l'TYU~ !SCALE:1·•1a-o- ~PROXIMATE LOCATION OF ...¢,._ \ EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT __ /-Y ,.,..-----LINE OF DETENTION TANKBELOW(SEE CIVILDWGSJ !ii "' :;; !;; ~ :, a, _,. CMC.aDDP:f.St.1l!O)ll"11SURNmSTIET,lolll'I..ERO:iE,!C LEOAI.AIDIESS: t.ar6111V11220'5.IIOTHOF5ECIIONl1TOtt!!19't21£WWEsnamEROSIRICf -,,_ ElGSIIIO R$-l,U.2{11mlUIHETTSTJ l~!USl11UNJTSTJ """""' "'' 2.tOTAIEA: C,RQS:9: Jl.11loJ.12.ffi51a) :Ef,OCEPCftfl'Jiu._.,l d.i,iS,-.,.Ul,.i l.DEIIIITT(FlOOl•/a.lArQ: AWMED. 21,ut.h1.111 •50.66:lt.1.n.llll) PROP05Elk MIJN l 2tiDfl.OOR3 ?\))6oJ.•&,2!!Ll • t5,(t\hlf\J!!5L111.I :WU1l>Bfflt. @!tm::i'JlMII• JIJC'1!0lhml C,203Ll/21,tlht o U\ 4.IJl.la..EMEITYNIEA: WTDOOR..uelT'l'!lf'ACI: 1iEOURED; :M.tl!hb2(11; •lll2Ulo.1.i,z!•,._I ~=lE',U!IPAC(: :;,~,!ru:'~1 T01'A1.!lit1.ifilu,,.j HXleftAmflY6"'-Cl: R£QUi'lfl): 1o ...... 5'UNIT1 •Z!t.l !51...,,.] PffM!'fTl: •2Wetm7,ml !DelEtl~ARf.A TOTAL •MLl.[ll!lt.ol) ·4~llr~1[::lG\~:.~.: l~PNIWlE-~ ..... ....., ........ .Jt~;H:f,~;,.nbu ~ 1.511PMKAII: ID:~ lhlltJlOWMll..lCE "'""' .... 1,,iJP,a(AIJE ol!UIJIIIGIIOliKT! wn&JMIEKlHTl'EIUTTm. 4mff'r.lCR\5n, P!!OP08EOHEIOKT: ~ltlJE'tlTa'OFW,!NROOFPNW'ET 5.t.arCCMRI.OE: l\1S.) ELEV,UWTTOPO.IIOOFPAIW'ET 12\.17m)VW>ICE~RSI l'!IOPOWlt.arCXM:IWlE: (13500aJ.J2111l9Lt)•100 o49'1, ·-...... AECUREll: •10 .. f\l!EOl1ISPACEAHT o,0SPACES •2' .. (111ED•t:ee•1SPAC(.l.lafolfiSPACE!I •JINQlf~fJ.L..WJ.:U, •205'/ffl PR:M1l£D: 559'AC:EBf'W915\W.L•ACti1~S1'ACE) vmn>I: -~!PAC£ RB1HD: •:Ot1PJSPMUHI •'4!S!Zll'f, 101'AL ois,,,,.cu PIIOWE!: .,v •~1111C.1(ES l1K,.-air~~"IE~ ::ifEIW...a: R£CUED : IFQRM:111'4111TS •W PROPOSED. "71N LO!m:ROCMISONLOWIUIIID<3! -l1 ........ l!ECUliltl : •11 PAClF'OSED'. •11 -IHT IHTIUEA LNTIIV.. AQl!RI 101111:8 1,02&0Ur,,!l:lou,.J AOM:'ffl1f6 zr.teftUl9nl TtJJAL JlNTS ::i;·;1I~1J:;r ,:u~msmwmrrmnrrnnmnmnnITTI~m:~~il1mT!TIS ~~ra!bn -·-Olf ltll f'11oo/::,mit.'''1\~1t'P1t0~.S:U~111' ~OIIO,na' {"°IU~~~OO ~•l"'I t 'lciWl :ir\,,":;.,\'Yiil.,~"""'fl '.!~'!?:~==:::Inc PROPOSED 5 STOREY CONDOMINIUM 11803 l 11817 BURNETT STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, BC YAf2../ A tJ C,t S A1.1 ..... c,IU.wtQQHt(:!0'{'""0,_QII_ Cll'....-AMCI-GIQ.UI IIQTNlo:PIIDOII l);JTW .. ,IIQIWll >QITHIIQOl ... .,,npieo,<•tn ;!;;f 1 i APPENDIX E 1~•-DEVELOPMENT DATA SHEET mapleridge.ca Existing /Proposed Zone Rs-11 RM-2 Date Prepared Dec. 21, 2018 Required Development Data Minimum Required or . Proposed (Complies or Maximum Allowed state variance needed) LOT AREA* (in square metres) Gross Total 2,676.5 Less Road Widening/ Truncations 62.61 Less Park -Net Total 1,300 2,614 LOT COVERAGE (in % of net lot area) I Total Site Coverage 48 ! SETBACKS (in metres) Front 7.5 7.5 bldg/ 6.0 deck wall (variance) Rear 7.5 6.68 bldg (variance)/ 5.3 deck wall (variance) Side #1 (N,S,E, or W) 7.5 (North) 7.5 bldg/ 5.8 deck wall (variance) (North) Side #2 (N,S,E, or W) 7.5 (South) 8.8 bldg/ 8.8 deck wall (South) Side #3 {N, S, E or W) --SETBACKS -Underground Structures (in metres) Front 3.0 3.0 Rear 1.5 1.5 Side #1 {N,S,E, or W) 1.5 (North) 1.5 (North) Side #2 (N,S,E, or W) 1.5 (South) 1.5 (South) Side #3 (N, S, E or W) --BUILDING HEIGHT {in metres/storeys) Principal 15 / 4 18.34 I 5 + 22.3m elevator roof parapet (variance) Accessory -NUMBEB O.E.BESIDENIIAL UNITS Bachelor -One Bedroom 10 (1 bed)/ 26 (1 bed + den) Two Bedroom 18 Three Bedroom+ -Total 54 GROSS FLOOR AREA (in square metres) Residential 5,864 Retail Commercial -Office Commercial -Other Commercial (Type ) -Institutional -Industrial -TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA 5,864 * If the development site consists of more than one lot, lot dimensions pertain to the entire site. -r ' ' -' ' ' ' '. : ,. : '. I I ' ' ' I :~ i ' ' ' ' ' ! I I I I I i Required Development Data Minimum Required or Maximum Allowed Proposed (Complies or variance needed?) DENSITY # of units/ha (gross) 202 # of units/ha (net) 207 Gross Floor Area 5,864 Floor Space Ratio (net) 1.80 1.61 AMENITY SPACE (area in square metres) i Common Activity Area 54 186 Useable Open Space 523 523 PARKING (number of spaces) Residential and Multi-Residential Uses -Multi-Residential Town Centre (Bach Units) -Multi-Residential Town Centre (1 Bdr Units) 36 10du(1 bed) x1 + 26du(1 bed+ den) x1 Multi-Residential Town Centre (Added Bdr) 20 18 du(2 bed) x1.1 Commercial Uses -Educational & Assembly Uses -Institutional Use -Industrial Use -Business Park Uses -Comprehensive -Other + 1 h/c space in u/g Number of spaces for visitors 6 5 (variance) TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES 62 62 (variance for visitor) Number of total for disabled 2 (1 u/g + 1 surface) Number of total (and%) small cars I % 1 (1.6%) Number of total (and%) tandem spaces I % -TOTAL OFF STREET LOADING SPACE(S) -BICYCLE PARKING {number of spaces) Short Term Bicycle Parking 17 17 Long Term Bicycle Parking 14 22 (17 u/g bike room+ 5 on u/g wall) OTHER -state YES or NO for each. If YES describe on separate sheet. Heritage Site I NO I Tree Survey/Assessment Provided I YES Watercourse/Steep Slopes I NO I Covenants, Stat ROW & Easements I NO I hereby certify that all the above information is true and correct. I acknowledge that any error or omissions are the sole responsibility of the undersigned and not the Development and Environmental Services Department. Larry Podhora, Architect AIBC, MRAIC Prepared by: ___________ _ Print Name (Please print form and sign above) NOTE: To be prepared by an Architect for ADP Submission or by an owner/agent (applicant) for Development Application. I I I f r Ii 1i 11 i i ! ' l '',j ;; ~: ;; ;; ',;:: ~ '.:;:;;;:I;. ' PROPOSED 5 STOREY CON !!O 11903 & 11917 BURNETT STREET, MAPLE RIDGE , BC SHEET LIST ARCHITECTURAL AO.I COVER PAGE Al.1 SITEPlAN Al.la CONTEXT PLAN A1.2 UNIT AREA PLANS A1.3 SITE SECTIONS At.4 SITE SECTONS At.5 SITE SECTIONS A1.6 SHADOW STUDY A1.7 SHADOW STUDY A1.B SIOEYARDWALKWAYSECTIONS A3.1 UNDERGROUND PARKING PLAN A3.2 MA IN FLOOR PLAN A3.3 2nd FLOOR PLAN A3.4 3rd-5th FLOOR PLAN A3.5 ROOF PLAN A4.1 ELEVATIONS A4.2 ELEVATIONS A4.3 PERSPECTIVES A4A EAST ELEVATION STREET SCAPE A10.1 UNITPLANS ---___.:----------------= PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITECT OF RECORD LARRY POOHORA ARCHITECT 1952 BRACXMAN WAY SAANlCH B.C. VBL OC2 CONTACT: LARRY PO OHORA BUILDING DESIGN KRAHN ENGINEERING L TO. 400-34077 GLADYS AVENUE ABBOTSFORD B.C. V2S 2E8 P.604.853.8831 F.604.853.1580 CONTACT: WAYNE VENABLES CIVIL KM CIVIL CONSULATANTS LTD. 400-340n GLADYS AVENUE ABBOTSFORD B.C. V2S 2E8 P.604.853.8831 F.604.853.1580 CONTACT: STUART McGREGOR GEOTECHNICAL BRAUN GEOTECHNICAL 106A·9785 192nd STEET SURREY B.C. V4N 4C7 P.604.513.4 190F.604.513.4195 CONTACT: HARMAN DH ILLON LANDSCAPE KO PLANNING CONSULTANTS LTD. 400 -340n GLADYS AVENUE ABBOTSFORD B.C. V2S 2E8 P. 604 .853.6831 F. 604.853.1580 CONTACT: SHAN THIESSEN SURVEYOR ARBORIST DIAMOND HEAD CONSUL TING L TO. 3551 COMMERCIAL STREET VANCOUVER VSN 4E8 P. 604.733.4886 F. 604.733.4879 CONTACT: TREVOR COX SOUTH FRASER LAND SURVEYING LTD. 212·12992 76TH AVE SURREY B.C. V3W 2V6 P.604.599.1886 CONTACT: )> "1J ""C ITI z 0 >< ,, ~~r!h~ UIOTZ,Oft OO,,w;! ,,o.,...,lt'.U:."j~'INJ[ """""VQOlll....!!:'o::l!IH• ll)MONl'CIN OfflCl!,~~~:tCt1•l,tlJ IWJ V~~COUV[ROH ICE" ,~:;.~.:'!'"f" "~;,.v"r:eu 5J<~,;..,f't oc, larry podhOl'a I, architeclure inc PROPOSED 5 STOREY CONDO 11903 & 11917 BURNETT STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, BC COVER PAG E A0 .1 !>fiOIIAV,Nitil''IOl'Elll\'Ol'OUY.tlNUIOUI' ~:;Q'. .. ,...5AOIC>lil<OlaOIIOT81!COl'l!OOA -TlilWT:DV,mUJT...__ntNco,,.w:111 il!f:~ :I I 1,:. I i i I } ; i J I l PROJECT COLOURS Ffi ELEVATION FINISH LEGEND [A] STONEVEN£:ER,LEDGESTCf11E,STEAUNG-C1 @] =er':EC::f~.M!JFIJ.Deeg:,.r~w"~~EATHER. [ru HARDIE PANEL. SMOOTH, IRON GR.O.YCO.OUR -C~ [HI SPANDAELPANEL [g HARDIE PANEL, SMOOTH, AUTUMN TAN COLOUR •C3 Q] STEEL MAN DOOR• PAINTED 1AON OA"Y COi.OUR [Q] [ID HAADIEPANEL,SMOOTH,C06BLESTONECOLOUR•C• Q] IBl METALFl.ASHING.PAINTEOTOM ... TCMWAU. COLOUR BELOW [El ~r..~fHl\l.UMINUMICI.ASSFWUNCPAlNTED 2 I EAST ELEVATION Tsc ... Le,1m·-1·-0· ·-r .. .Q.~,~ --Lfu-l99tt _f!f!t!.f!f.~ ..£Pi<~ .Ji~ .lli~~ -""-"fil,~ ___ I _______ _ 1,1,~~8r~ ~J, ~1· ;a ____ ! ____ ~Id ~ ti -·-i-·-· ·1· ~; _!.Q.e:f.fir.-$- __ r,.~~:.-$- _ _JJ.S~t~ ---+-..flET.tl~c~ !Ii _132!1T~m~ -llifl~m~ ---+!l~Nfrf,~'8'!-$- • ...!!!t-1!(~:--($> ~Kra!h~ •BB0~f(l~P0ffl(:! •"!.,"'."''/r4';_,1.•·,o.v~ l.ll!IOTS?O,_!IL, ~~·D Elll,IO>JTOHOFFICE . ...;_)~~.:. ~ .. ~;..&,,f"·~°'' .... '~'"' ;~:;.~ ,, ... :::"f'"'C r1,!U'P' larry podhora I architecture inc PROPOSED 5 STOREY CONDO 119D3 & 11917 BURNETT STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, BC ELEVATIONS wccr.to ""' ----------- A4.1 T>l5PAAWING!:;~ACFE!ln'OF~IWIN(.OOUP crc.ovP4"10~•NDS'1(>0.I.D>J018ECO'J;DQf, Ot,,"Tl;IIJL/l :P\';lll10U rPnl,'.Jf\WF•nr.11 CU>,iU11 ~. /:. (: --.,---,--·,,-0 L,,,::~00~~11~~~0~~JJ~''.':~:-:~~~~•7,--,--, ----,----c!tJlll ;:;,,;,;1l.1M1d~ I 11 f ,, ; ! } l i i g t l l PROJECT COLOU RS i s~LE:11e·-1·-o· 3''-(;" 110.S2mJ ELEVATION FINISH LEGEND ~ STONEVENEER,LE.OOESTONE.STER!JNG•C! (ID HAAOIE PANEL SMOOT1"1, !RON GRAY COLOUR • C2 (£1 1-CAAOIE P.O.NEL SMOOTH. AUTUMN Tf<N COLOUR -C3 @] HARDIE PANEL SMOO TH, COBBLE STONE COLOUR• C4 [fil ~~~~ltt.J· PAINTED TO MATCH WALL l£] ~i,.,~~H ALUMINUM/GLASS RAIL.ltlG PAINTED :l (§] 1JN~~~E;J~i.ii~~oeegu:<:~ ... H~:EATllER, [BJ f NORELPANEL Q] Sr EELMAN DOOR• PAINTED'IRON GR ... YCOLOUR Q] Nr TUSEO (E] NpT USEO (10,07m) 1 I SOUTH ELEVAT ION T sc.o.LE:,w -1·%" 2 1 WEST ELEVATION J SCALE:1 18"•1'-0" $ T.O.P~1i~~ <;> ~ r T.O.RJ2QF-""- 53'-0 11,._,.- _ __JJ.,S~~~~ ~11 :e L---i---+-~"-~-t1~;~ ·1· ~a ~1· .. § d. :1! ;a ~~ -r [ ~~ ~i 'M'l/M u.ss:.:~ 'I' ~; ~1· ;a ~1· .. § ri. ~~ ~~ Jf JHR l%of}..,j~ ~1· ;~ Ji" SEC0N1~l\~ ~~ ~~fo~~M~ AUOT!.f-OA00"1e~ !~..;.\{~,"".,~. """'i ~·~ ........ ="'""' tllMCNTON Ol'FICE. ;, ..,,:J~r,o.t·~.":· iw~~-,,,., "" "' , ... , ,.:;..~J.."::,.:1 ... :t.:f!Xi ·J<~;t,;rJ-' !~;z1e~~~r!J,.~~~~~Z-~! inc PROPOS ED 5 ST O REY CONDO 11903 & 11917 BU RNETI ST REET, MA PLE RIDGE, BC ELEVATIONS A4.2 THI~ OAAWING I!; M<lf'l:lll" OP ~!WIN \'.ol>QUP C~Co'.'r~ .... ~ •ND m•(lU_ll ... ~1 ~ECC<'El,Ok c,srnmu1:u1·a111 a u~1<..,..v1A1nCHco..sw1 ,;;::f0.ITIB,:;mmsmmnCT~nn~µnnnnmm:m1mrrrrTirrrrnnnr.nnununni fi~H~ttmmmmmm1TITI~mrrnrnmn»TITIUlillnP11n11nnmi;:;;;;;rrniilluunnnnnnnn:mnnmrnnrinnn:>r:nn~;:f'.':m:1;'~~rnn1i;}"~~,,,r~~~~"i: i~~ir~~~"~:,rE,~~rrr~r}<')f:Pf:r:Lr:rnrinnnnnnmmrin~nnnn11nnnnnnrinnnnr:r::,nr:r:~~ff---; c:-~~~-:)::/! i i 1: F. 1! l 1i 1 G)-----·-·---t ·-,---------------1--~ i i ! I i i i i i ©---------L ©---------- ©-------- ©-------- ©-------- i i i --f-- i i i i -:--·-·--·-·-·-1-1 i i i i cb cb -----I--- ~-----1----------+~-LINEOFRAISEDIIOOF I ---·-·r-·---- i i cb i i i ·1· -~ -0 ·-·[· --0 ----·~.[~= ~ ~Ii ---+-- OUTDOOR AMENITY AREA i I ·1· §~ --® 4671 f s.f. [434 s.m.J i I I ____ ) ____ l 1 r r i l i I I i i cb cb cb 1 .I ROOF DECK I SCALE: 1/8•. r-o- cb AOOF DECK: •B71 IQ,tt, (~ sq,n.J DECKVESTIBULE:.WO;oJI. !41 IQJn~ INCLUOWSTAIAS •I! i--© "' ~ -0 ____ J _______________ _ ~ ~~fa!~~ LJ LJ Ul01$f(l~00f!l(;l ~"!,""1!'-~~-·~.·:'!!-)'.~-~'!'?-~~~rntr:» PROJECT NORTH }"'1•,on,.,.> .. D•'"J:':/'U:'9 "011 .... 11,/IWJ VAN,Oll\llNOfflCII 1::;..·;:l=U::"1 .. ~~,.";.'.:-,."i','t.l.."'' ~zi~r:J;~~~~::!: inc PROPOSED 5 STOR EY CON DO 11903 & 11917 BUANETI STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, BC ROOF PLAN A3.5 l tfS Olt,\-(l ~f''IOl'tnl'f'Of'OlfWW(,l'OUt' C,0(.0'.11'""1£:;....,i,,,cu.,;;w,;i r.,..(.(ll ... l>OOI IIISl fillll.l l W \OrlJIOUl "'I-Wl>o n tHOO.WII ITij ,.,11 1 "ii :ti. ,, ,, J ,'l IH 'I .l ' 11' ' I } l 1 l I I '· ~_J _,l [.::_SA M I 1 SCALE:1"•61l'-O" ' ... ,-·-----i 1 ,~~! ~ , 1 1 r "··· , .. 1 _ ::i j .. L --J 4 tl oec21-SAM t ~.~-J °'" j j "-L_j' 2 I SE P 22-12PM T scALE:r .w-O" l JI 1i.-\ , I ) L__,, __ _r.J . ______ J 5 I DEC21 ·12PM i sc11LE:i-.w-o- ,:'! ~~~~0; -:1: :0~; ~ .. 3 l sEP22 -4PM I SCALE:l"•W-0° ---------, .... ,-------i J r-~~-r---.1 i j [ c'.;,--r ~ ~' ,, ___ J ~ 6 I DEC21-4PM T sc.o.t.E:1·.w-<r a ~ra!~~ •11•on.o~oomc~ ;.~J:l~1f',"'~t'~,',..,, .. ~~""~ o..c.. ~,,..,:,. ,~J~:.'io.f.':;r.;~:..u~·,w .... 'IJ '"'· v ... 11couvucme1. \.'!>.A~"r.·v'1 .. '."9it J,/';..,'l'Ll..c, 1a r'J:!odhora I a~hit~ctu: inc PROPOSED 5 STOREY CONDO 11903 & 11917 BURNETT STREET, MAPLE RIDGE. BC SHADOW STUDY k>'l•"N >C ------------- A1.7 , .. sORAIW<lll~P~oPEnW OFKJ\AIIN U10\J~ 0,-(.0•1P~NliS.NPS~OU1.r,wo1 ~~ CO'JcDOfl c,~T>!IIIUJ :1,m11 10Ur~nt.J11v""'n CNcu.fi.Ctn l•J l 1••11~ "8""-'r°'i11'1 ,,,,,l/1 ,,,:.i,, I I I I I I I I I I I I I .1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L----------------J 2 :J oz ~ ~C) oO~ a.. 0 0 0 z -' o:: O 5 a.. o ca 0' ti ~' s& " ,, i! ~ Oi \. -r-------~ @i @l APPENDIXG 0 !;; 0 ~ z ZI--oz ~~ ~ uW ,.::. !;:::ui w w"-~g "-n:9 " gw ;ii g u,Gj ~~ 0 z .,,o c~ _'.'j l i • § I. E1 ) ROOFTOP ENLARG EM ENT AREA ~ N~ § COMMUNITY GARDEN BOX PREIIIEAPAClflCnelisAU. PEREIINIALWLOfLClilE~ SE Et ~~ 03 ) CUSTO~ \/\IOOD BENCHES ~ ROOF TOP PLANT LIST L 1.2111111. l I l'1 lf•111••""'oo1" SEEDlllGIIOTES I 1, AREAS DESIGIATEO fOII SHO Y~LL fOUOW'lliESE OOIDEUNES. 1.REMc,.,E,.LLOURISl,ICWWIOBUTNOTUMITEOTOALLORANUU.R!TONE,CCt/CRm,V..OOO.t.1,1D'lf'TALSCAlllfV "'"=m•M="'"'""''~'=~'~'°'· I ~-e~iE,,"~s:.Efo~~ .. :.e1~~:.:t"EAc.u:,c,m1 ..... o ~e GRAOfTOPSOll...GIIAOHOII F'OS, OR.olNAGE. •. TO n.suR, AC:Cf P'f.tJ,ICt °" TH E COl,!PLffiOWOII~. fflE Ce<mlACTOII S!IAU IIOT co .... ENCE UEOJ,IOUNTlL THE PROJECTIIAAAGERlw::APPRWEOfl,IEGftADE~ I :·~:~~~~~::?.:.:-~~~Rllr~g.:,m.f':;,~~Rl,IG'!W,WANOJUN! mil fOII SmlOWOll-,OII :::::;::[N=~::::::::y::::::::LBEACCErnDPRCMOt lW,TA ~~~AIIOJNTOfTHESHOlw::GERYl>!t.TEO.lNODECOI.UESTABLl:;HEOIN'lliEO!'WICNOf i EPROJECT S.UAlNTENANCEfOIISEEDEOAAEASSKAI.LaEGINlll.,ECIA.TELY.I\ITERlm::r41.u,,11et1ANOSHALL~UEUNTIL ;::;:;:e8:v;::,::YAN•OER. I PAUIIEAPACl'ICSEECISCo,,.$TAL RM0tl'ATICNM!XATSEEOlllOAATt:Of100~GIHECT"11!0IIN'PAWEOECIUAI.AT SHOltlGMTEOl'10C~~ECTAAE. Q, ,. . . I,,. ·'· ..... ' I ,. ' ' •. ,,,. :: .• 1 ~.~l "ii •·1•'.!,~.:.l a-/:1': ';•;;. '.::im1 ~:,:1,•.t;,~1,;·.,;1:1J \ui',I:, 1-•J!,j!l ',(j·!i';l',•i•i(!l:I,.1:1Vi~ ,1 ·::-T,1iTI~!;~ii/f'1l.flfTiffiiTI 11ifoo~mmi!11111tf/1~11111;~~1;1;,;11i:TID~;:,1i,.l ~~!!h~ ,,lilj,}i:,,1,,,,1'1'1'.:11 ,,., . ....., ... ,~·-0,· ••'C ,.,, .. ,.,.,..,, '-,.,. ·'·' I ??.•H1•l1 • <!'4.tit·,>IH• """"·-•·•••·" ,,~.,.,., •. ,nu ) ~!·~ .. -. ••••. ,, ·,1 <.1 ,• , ;)J..no:°'~, ,, ... :.i .,i u: ···-•··'·"·~·· ~KP..f~nning • IJa.\1-\• l:.G~ECFORRE-OP -----···--·-----·-·······-·-······-·--- • &IQ.II ir.:uEllfOR R~ ----------- 111-10.11 i,.:;uu,FOR~TRli[TTRliU ~II i:.f.UUIFOIIR&-OP < 117..,._II a:;,u£DF<>IIREVIEW ·-·-·-·······-······-·-······· .. ····-·· .. -····"'•··· ~ 211-10.17 a:;.ruECFORCP --·---·----····---·--···-·- 1,:. u .;;c.;.,,..;. llH1 1111rn,:,,1 -······-······-····· ....... ·-·-··-··········· #.t017~tfS:R~ B.C .S.L A #565 ~ ~ 5 STOREY CONDO DEVELOPMENT 11903, & 11917 BURNETT ST. MAPLE RIDGE, B.C. ROOF DECK LANDSCAPE PLAN AND DETAILS L2 '!g~ c,, • ._.,.,,,1. ·.,,,,:v." •> •~"'"· c,~<,W -, c·~J~"'"c :·,i,i, :,..c••n O>J"r.llll~('l'!l:r.<r1 ,o•,,-r..,.n ,,.., • .:.,,o, """·'~•'"''''' · ~,w,Jt ll~ JI I r , !!..:P.!:!"'~~-· -.. _ ... ,-.. ~·-=~~ ~=:~~ ?E:~l~5:~·!:~, ;:-~~..!:':'~ ... :.=..~~~~· '// • ,,,. . l'GD'(lll""'0'!0$ .... :3"' ,,;:.iB~,';;:;, !:»°~""' ,i --i ,;c'\ • ; .~ r----, ,.~TOlfJ:W .. cv.ss~•T'ltOll,V$¥.ml5-l'l'AIIIDlTlt,\l\411. 1.CONCftffiTOHo.\1£1AOOlilf911S!1 10 ,D<IOQJIMl0ntl!lENGn!Of'THE -1EVAH!:IOHJONTST011f.lOCATl!IIATtvU'l',boAHDl'Mf:R!CONCftn'E ,A\IINO~cmtE!lntl~ElOfll.lA.o,,,)S. •.cor.mux.10,.rUTOl(LOCATl!OATM1:IIV.ll.S0f2.0,.NIOATCE>m!EIJME Of•J><ow.DTHWWCWAV, (~~: STAMPED CO NCRETE "" ~ ·ij-::.=· ..... -------r~"""·· ~ l~:;::;_;:i.'::,·- +I H!!:i!!:·4 V= I -1¥, I ---·J L'~d m~·~k~ .,_,.,,IN'\ ...... - § GUARDRAILFENCE fill ---fllJ ::::::::. =:a~ =~---.i;e',!llil',IWPAR~,m· .. -------""'::'ca:=:::- -··-·-.. -... _ -----a ~"l!•MIDS"fCl'lC:&IP!li ,,.ff.RN, -(CUT1'o2' t;Ol,CIJA, OWICC.... "'-"lllf~EII: MIIOl':;f()IIOCONCIIETf ectnAtf· WlloW.PA~nc<lil VOIOf0! .. ,1voTHElll.lfNUD(O, W:r,iUANf.WATUPIIOOf'HO Aflll tlWIATIONBYQl)tfft~ f----------+--=i--~~~~~t:i%1~AAL ( ~2 \ UNIT PAVERS ON PEDESTAL AN D SLA B \ __ J ,------=r~~~~ ® RI VER ROCK DRIP STR IP TSl!wllOT01-0II.CUNO -tol!NEAIIOCK. llf .. -. ...... _oon10.ot10 ltUUTOIJIIOIITf<;TUIIAI. CCHCUTl!aJLl*OSI.Al,U:£ MOllnCI\.IOIM.NID:.TIIIJc:TVIIM.., -,,,_ -.;'f;'\ BIKE RACK TO BE: CORA VV7510, FITS 8-10 FINISH: POINO ER COAT COLO UR TO BE DETERM IN ED e ALLAN BLOCK RE TAININ G WAL L ] LI GHT BOLLARD TO BE: T ECHNILUM 'S HI RAZ NANO (BORN E)' FINISH: SLATE GREY TO MATCH BUILD IN G HEIGHT: 2' 7 !" -3' 11 t • OR APPROVED EQUAL D6 ) PLAYGROU ND SURFAC l~G N~~ @ LIG HT BO LLARD .. )r:;;:---UIOI.IF'.-iTLEOCP.(OU11!£!1-00NOTc:llf /-· ... -·~--/ ~~1-•=u, ~::~~=~~~s . ;;r;;~:~~:::~ ... l .. ,."~'"""""'=" :: .. ~l:~:".:.:,:.'::"w""-"~"'· 100. .. ~TO,IPO-W..1[11.11.PIOl:;<>11. l.<tt< OUND I II.HM. ' CUT o, a. 11.(MIM! AU '"'""-TWNE, WRI! .U(E'TS. nc. LOO~ a,oLDtAClll/11. .... ,TO I OTIOMOf PI.ANT NOHOLI IIC,011. ;1DE:OFPL.<NUICIIIOLE ::::..1:.::-.::::.::.-::::·" .~ ... IMO .. lj<~-IEOM[OIJW&Dl:'IN O!:OIL l ~"'°"'lllj'T(IUUIO,K;:ll.A9.!:UIJIOllffC1\,IIW.ANOS1111u,;TIIIU,L. DECID UOUS TREE -ON SLAB NTS ~~1 .. ,00 ... H~TEl<IPOll•ir,WlTEJOII.NOI ~ 71,""'0EPT.tOFMUUUu:H T•PU.ATTOP0,11.00l&o.LLAT&..i:EOf~II.UI, PREPAAEDPI.NITl<OMEOllM-FIAMLYPACKEO. OCAll.1fY~D£ll0f-llNClf<CI.E ,oo-coo.,P•CTUISOl.-0 I .... Ml< OUl>PUlD M"lklM & DISING ~L. ~ca,coETE--Cl,Al,UfNICH!UCNMl#IC!nOLJ<;NOAl. SHRUB A ND PEREN NIA L -ON SLAB NT S ;i.11 1111iJilL/11-tJUiJIJiliHfoiJili111i ""UNE-'D•.r,,,,c;u1011D€AOIUH0iU. DONOTII.DoOYl:LIMICII: J,OO.-•OUHDNt,;Q,ltl(Til"'TlltlflUUl(T VU.TICAU.ll.•-LYIITDI.INOl:::TVIIHDWl,;OL AlDISl"'C[;PAIW,lU""1\41.0-1~SL PAVOIEffTUIC.U~-... [V~-0,N llf'Ol$P.0.CU • GTAlUIIOTTO-..ol"Oll•OOlf11ATIOOOl"'41.. 00 ... ....,DE"'°'Ol ... lDII ..... _N'toUOll ••nlON ~=-:~::::::=rllN•l~HlAW~m,t-( T""EOATIOl'OfOOOTIAU.t.OTOEIIA::ID,ot;EO, ~;;;1;~:;;J;;~~t;~~~~~t~cu •u•AAEDl'I.ANTNOUl:OIJw.,1owlv ,.o.c~EO, ,c.o.01,v~ouo,~TNOHOll 100-COIIPACIUl'.Ol(IIOUl<O -Mll!:.o.J-l!OMEDIJWiD;i;T,-O;QL. I .. ,, --~CO!fCRfTf~G;v.a.,11 .uio<IT"NMlA>lO:JIRUCNOAl, CONI FERO US TREE -O N SLAB NT S :n1:ii:F ,.J,:ii:!1:.1:1;· ::J:, IL l:.il;l,,Jii,.·.i,, a~~,b.~ ,eo,,_..,,,,,,~,,..,. •·,' , ... ,.",·ur. I... ·•r. 1" 1 "'·"P••· • 1N t\(0:,111, ••"'''"'"'" '"''M''~ ·--..1 •. , ,,~.,,,,,.-,)JC/,~, ~I <1-'!,r.<.r ·J o, ,1 ';l•••T> "·'>"'u"···'•«.,:,.,JU'•'••.,"•'"'""' ~K~.f~nning L• .. ,1-11 W:UlO'OIIOl-ol' --.. ,--.. --.. --.. -·---·--.. --......... _ • .'11,IO>IJ =U,,O,,CII' --------- #2b17=48S:-RZ 5 STOREY CON DO DEV ELOPM ENT 11903, & 11917 BURNETT ST. MAPLE RIDGE , B.C. DETAI LS ___ .. _______ .. __ .................. __________ .... . " , .. ~,,~,r.,,• ·---------- L3 'l<o l ,..,. ..... .,,c,. '""·l-iJ't--~· •l-· CJ'(~ ... -~ ~""-'"r>,.("t,n,r:111 .;n'II:~'"" JH .. ,,~,·~,.._..,,....,,.,,,., ...... _,_,,, ""I 111~ f'i fi~'.[ ·,.,r :; ii ; ~j _l_ z 0 ~ "' l ! I i [:_ i l r~ ! -, I -,~-~ I 1~••= TO: FROM: mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT:--Development Variance Permit 24592 105A Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: September 1, 2020 FILE NO: 2020-251-DVP MEETING: C o W Development Variance Permit application (2020-251-DVP) has been received for the subject property, located at 24592 105A Avenue, to vary the setbacks to have the house oriented towards 105A Avenue, rather than 245B Street. The requested variance is to: 1. Reduce the rear yard setback from 6.0 metres (19.7 ft.) to 1.2 metres (3.9 ft.) It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2020-251-DVP be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2020-251-DVP respecting property located at 24592 105A Avenue. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Legal Description: A. Hayre Lot 47, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan EPP76590 § i I Existing: Low/Medium Density Residential I ________ _,_,., roposed-. ----------1-,owfMedittm-Bensity-Residentia·i------------~i OCP: Zoning: Existing· RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) I Propos~d: ~F.~::~~fiFamily Urban (Medium Density) i Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: 2020-251-VP Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Low/Medium Density Residential and Conservation Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Low/Medium Density Residential 1108 Page 1 of 3 East Use: Zone: Designation: West Use: Zone: Designation_: _ Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Previous Applications: b) Project Description: Vacant RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), Density Bonus to R-1 regulations Low/Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Low/Medium Density Residential Vacant Single Family Residential 825.6 m2 (8,887 ft2) 2458 Street Urban Standard 2012-065-RZ/SD/DP/DVP, 2017-154-SD The subject property, located at 24592 105A Avenue, was recently created with a larger subdivision application (2017-154-SD) (see Appendices A and B). The larger subdivision applied the Albion Density Bonus provision, allowing RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zoned lots to be subject to the R-1 (Residential District) smaller lot sizes and setbacks, with a Density Bonus fee. As a result, the smaller single family lots fronting 105A Avenue are subject to the R-1 (Residential District) zone setbacks, whereas the subject property, due to its larger area of 825.6 m2 (8,887 ft2), including the hooked portion to the north, is subject to the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) setbacks. A variance was already approved under 2012-065-DVP to allow the front yard setback to be reduced to 3.0 metres (9.8 ft.) to be consistent with an exterior side setback. However, the applicant would now like to change the location of the rear yard on this corner lot, to be to the south of the house, rather than to the east, as originally shown. c) Variance Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for single family development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. ih-e-re-que-ste-d-variance a nd-rattonale-forsupport is described----below-tsee~Appendix-e-}-. -----1. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No 3510 -1985, Part 6, Section 601, C. REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE, SHAPE AND SITING OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES (9) (c): i. To reduce the rear yard setback from 6.0 metres (19.7 ft.) to 1.2 metres (3.9 ft.). The proposed variance can be supported as the building envelope and setbacks would be consistent with the neighbouring lots to the east. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: In accordance with the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, notice of Council consideration of a resolution to issue a Development Variance Permit was mailed to all owners or 2020-251-VP Page 2 of 3 tenants in occupation of all parcels, any parts of which are adjacent to the property that is subject to the permit. CONCLUSION: The proposed variance is supported because the setback will be consistent with neighbouring lots to the east. :I ~ I ,-~ ! ------It is-therefore-reeemmenEled-that this-a1313licatien be favourably eonsidered and the-Gorporate Offieef--------+ ~~ be authorized to sign and seal Development Variance Permit 2020-251-DVP. , "Original signed by Michelle Baski" Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT, MA Planner 2 "Original signed by Mark McMullen" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Al Horsman" Concurrence: Al Horsman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Site Plan Showing Proposed Variances 2020-251-VP Page 3 of 3 I I I I ! ! i r : [_-I f I ~· r I-' en LO ~ N Scale: 1 :2,000 APPENDIX A 10590 10588 10587 10586 10585 10582 10580 10583 10570 10579 10558 10565 10548 10543 I 10536 I I ' -10526 10529 I 1os30 10512 10502 10492 I ~, I ffi I 10481 I~ I I 10486 10476 10469 ---\ 10466 Legend -Stream ---Ditch Centreline Indefinite Creek -Lake or Reservoir • ------~ \ \ \ \ I \ 24592 105A AVENUE PIO: 030-539-625 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1i11m.a FILE: 2020-251-VP DATE: Aug 17, 2020 maple ridge.ca BY:PC ~! 1:~ I ,-1 I I~ I I N Scale: 1 :2,000 APPENDIX B 24592 105A AVENUE PIO: 030-539-625 FILE: 2020-251-VP DATE: Aug 18, 2020 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY:DT ~ ·-,_./ _,,. . ( I ' ' I / MIN.&PROP. FLANKING SETBACK ~ rc.;,•l. ,_ ,/ ,/ ,,/' :i: 0 :u fl\)fO~ £{,,-. -:J.n~ k...vc... vc-r:~ ~ t ~ _., 2.,oll. -<i.,\":~ _________ yf _'Q 1) ,t;6~~~.~ri-arlanc:11 ,/ ~ ro f o~~ V c.ri"" o., --------- \hW°i~ r"''~ l-~.:... P"'f O $1,-~ '1- --- ~ j1 ~ "' ~ ii --------------i I ~ u tffi I ~~ (t: ~~ r~~ p~~~l.2.- _______ __J ~ \I ;,;~ ~~ w 0 in LEGEND ~ MAX..ENVELOPEALLOWED ~ PROP. ENVELOPE ALLOWED -PROP. HOUSE ENVELOPE AREA CALCULATIONS ~ LOT AREA: 5748 SOFT , f;S1 ~~ ~g~~~g~ :~~~~~~i.i:z~~';tci VARIANCE: 1129 SOFT -MAX. COVERAGE ACHIEVABLE WITH VARIANCE: 1986 (SOFT SETBACK MJN. FRONT SETBACK: 7.5M MIN. REAR SETBACK:7.5M MJN. SIDE SETBACK: 1.BM MIN. FLANKING SETBACK: 4.5M PROP. FRONT SETBACK: 6 .0M PROP. REAR SETBACK: 6.0M PROP. SIDE SETBACK: 4.SM PROP. FlANKING SETBACK: 1.2M THESE PLANS CONFORM TO BCBC 2018 CONSTURUCTION SHALL FOLLOW LOCAL BUILDING 8Y·LAWS ALONG WITH THESE PLANS. CONTRACTOR MUST CONFIRM ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE DESIGNER ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS IN THESE PLANS. IT JS THE BUILDER/OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO REVIEW AND VERIFY THE WHOLE PLAN (I.e. All LEVELS, DIMENSIONS, STRUCTURAL ADEQUACIES) PRIOR TO CONSTURCTION. 00 NOT SCALE DRAW INGS. COPYRIGHT RESERVED . ANY VARIATIONS AND MONDIFICATIONS TO THESE DRAWINGS SHAU. NOT BE CARRIED OlfT WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM PAO VlllA DESIGNS LTD. THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF PVDL AND CAN ONLY BE REPRODUCED WITH PVDL·S WRITTEN PERMISSION. PLEAE NOTE THAT THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMIT APPLICATION PURPOSES ANO NOT INTENDED TO BE ISSUED FOR CONSTAUCTION UNIII APPRO VED BY CITY /.,,:,,. ~ ... y' ,..:.., .(:.r.~-~·..:.-...- \\'VJJ Jq ~ Das1gns Pro VIII.ii. Oaslgns Lid, #10B·8299129S1,111 Sum:y, B.C. V3W OAS Ph.604-593-7070 inlo@vlll.il.deslgns .ca, WWW.\lllladestgns .c. Amarjit Hayre PH : (604) 501 -7732 LOT #47 Maple Ridge, B.C . Site Plan Variance ):> \K1111.1lllhf PVDL-20-1128-AH -c joc\OIIW 1 JUNE 2020 I ""'C :bl'lbyl\nl-Ooi. l'TI -- z o· 1 JUNE2020 ---~ A13 ,n,·-1·-•·11 i x (') 1 ,l, I!.: /di ij TO: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: FILE NO: September 1, 2020 11-5240-01 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: cow SUBJECT: Award of Contract -Municipal Replacement Combination Tandem Axle Sander Truck with Underbody Plow EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The approved Financial Plan includes funding for the replacement of one (1) Tandem Axle Combination Sander Dump Truck. A public request for proposals to supply the tandem axle truck resulted in (8) eight proposals from two bidders, Harbour International Truck Ltd. And First Truck Centre. Following a detailed evaluation of the proposals, it is recommended that the contract to supply the Tandem Axle Combination Dump Truck with underbody plow be awarded to Harbour International Trucks Ltd with Falcon Equipment Body. The truck is an essential component of the City's snow response in winter and the operation and maintenance of roads, water, sewer and storm water utilities through the remainder of the year. RECOMMENDATION: That the contract for the purchase of one (1) Combination Tandem Axle Sander Dump Truck with Underbody Plow be awarded to Harbour International Trucks Ltd. in the amount of $265,093.00, plus applicable taxes of approximately $31,811.16; and furthermore, that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The Request for Proposal (RFP-OP20-27) for the suQPJy of one (1) Tandem Axle Dump Truck was publicly advertised on May 15, 2020 and closed June 16, 2020. Harbour International Truck Ltd. with five options, and First Truck Center with three options were submitted and evaluated. The results of the evaluations recommend award of a Falcon Equipment dump truck body with a 2021 International HV613 SBA 6X4 Tandem Axle Cab and Chassis to Harbour International Trucks Ltd. b) Financial Implications: The cost of the truck is within the approved budget and funded through the Equipment Replacement Reserve Fund. Total purchase price for the unit is $265,093.00 plus applicable taxes of approximately $31,811.16 Doc #2546707 Page 1 of 2 1131 ,:-:¥ r ' ,--!~ ,_ = , __ ·-----~ CONCLUSION: Following a public request for proposals, and analysis of the received submissions, it is recommended that the contract to supply one (1) Tandem Axle Combination Sander Dump Truck with Underbody Plow be awarded to Harbour International Trucks Ltd. ''(_ Prepared by: Walter Oleschak PMP Superintendent Roads and Fleet -~'~ ~y: James Storey Director of Operations ~~-f? ~: \v.oa%( Pollock P.Eng General Manager, Engineering Services Concurrence(lga~ Chief Administrative Officer Page 2 of 2 -~-~-:;E" =• =--== TO: FROM: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden -and Members of eouncil-Chief Administrative Officer CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE MEETING DATE: September 1, 2020 FILE NO: --0-1-0640~30 MEETING: CoW SUBJECT: Golden Ears Winter Club Operating Agreement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Golden Ears Winter Club (GEWC) and the City of Maple Ridge (CM R) have had an operating agreement for the provision of curling services for more than 20 years. The current operating agreement is at the end of its final term. The Club has met all of the obligations of their current agreement, therefore staff are recommending a new operating agreement which has some minor revisions (attached for Council's consideration). RECOMMENDATION: That staff be directed to enter into a new operating agreement with Golden Ears Winter Club for a three-year period ending on August 31, 2023, with options to renew for two further terms of 3 years each; and, That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the GEWC operating agreement. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: -r-1 ---------·TnePlane Ice complex, ILlcalm:t-onJtm-~ubs-on-Way;-is-operated-by-R6-Properties-l:td:-(-R6-)-, -----+-and the Golden Ears Winter Club Society. The City entered into an agreement with GEWC in September 1999 for five years with the option to extend for three further periods of five years each. Initially, RG played a more significant role with operations of the club until 2005 when GEWC became more independent. This transfer of responsibilities was laid out in the 1999 agreement, however, over the years, operations became a financial burden for the Club. A Council resolution in 2015 approved allocated funding to help support the club with increased utility costs and the re-introduction of summer dry floor operations through an addendum to the agreement. GEWC continues to do an excellent job of managing day to day operations for curling activities. The Club facilitates a wide range of programming for curlers of all ages and abilities, including 1171 2473757 Page 1 of 3 school and youth programs. The GEWC provides curling activities from August to April and supports dry floor rental in cooperation with CM R from May to July through a summer operating addendum to the 1999 GEWC operating agreement. The new agreement addresses the items previously approved and agreed upon in addition to minor revisions to the operating reserves, annual financial statements, clarity of direct costs for school programs, preventative maintenance and repair plan as well as COVID-19 implications. b) Desired Outcome: To provide Maple Ridge residents with cost effective services and continued support for GEWC in the independent delivery of curling services while ensuring dry floor amenities are available in the spring and summer. c) Strategic Alignment: Entering into a new operating agreement with Golden Ears Winter Club aligns with the 2010 Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan by ensuring partnerships are well defined, well managed, supported, valued and evolving. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The continued services administered by the Club will provide opportunities for curlers during the winter season and dry floor users in the spring and summer. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The new operating agreement aligns with the City's practice of working closely with non-profit societies through agreements for the cost-effective and efficient provision of recreation services. 2473757 Page 2 of3 l ! CONCLUSIONS: The Golden Ears Winter Club provides first class curling services for residents and visitors of Maple Ridge. Staff recommends entering into a new operating agreement for a three-year term, with the option to renew for a further two 3 year terms. ---~~ Prepared by: Russ Brummer Manager, Business Operations Reviewed by: Danielle Pope Director, Recreation & Community Engagement Approved by: David Boag · ~ ~ General Ma 6ge:.::.~ ation & Culture Concurrence: Al Horsm Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: (A) 2020 -Golden Ears Winter Club Operating Agreement 2473757 Page 3 of 3 ----l I H ~ ' J GOLDENS EARS WINTER CLUB OPERATING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT dated the 1st day of September 2020 is BETWEEN: ---------------"'C~ITY~O~F~M~A~P=LE~R=ID~G=E, a corgorate body having,_,_it.,.,,sc..,o"-'-ff,._,_,ic,,,,,e'----'a,,,_,t. __________________ -+ AND: 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6G2 (Hereinafter called the "City") GOLDEN EARS WINTER CLUB, a society incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia having its registered office at23580 Jim Robson Way, Maple Ridge, B.C., V2W 188. (Hereinafter called the "Club") WHEREAS: A. The City provides recreation services to residents through the Parks, Recreation & Culture department and works with community partners to meet these needs; B. The City and the Club have entered in an agreement with respect to the municipally owned building located at 23580 Jim Robson Way, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2W 188, known as the Golden Ears Winter Club; C. The City has agreed with the Club to permitthe Club to use the Curling Facilities for Curling Uses, for the Term, subject to renewal periods as set out herein, upon and subject to the terms and conditions set out herein; D. The Club is a community leader that will play a key role to strengthen the sport of curling; to build community wide awareness and to encourage an understanding and appreciation of curling in creating a healthy, vibrant community. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and agreements herein contained, the City, so far as it lawfully can but not otherwise, and subject to applicable legislation and bylaws, together with the Club, covenant and agree as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS -Where used herein: 1.1. "Agreement" means this agreement and all schedules and recitals thereto; 1.2. "Arena Operator" means the independent operator of the arena located beside the Curling Facilities which at the time of this contract execution is RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) LTD; 1.3. "COVID-19" means the communicable disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus; I ' I ! I I I I I ~-=--;... 1.4. "Pandemic Plan" means a written plan that meets all Public Health Requirements for the conduct of the Club's activities on the Property during the COVID-19 pandemic or similar outbreak; 1.5. "City Operations" means the City's use and operations of the Curling Facilities including the rental by the City of the Surface to third parties during the Summer Season, the ___ rental _by the Ci!Y of the Other Related Facilities to third i:iarties during the Term and the use of the Curling Facilities by the Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association; 1.6. "Club Operations" means the Club's use and operations of the Curling Facilities including curling and related social and meeting activities, the rental by the Club of the Other Related Facilities to third parties during the Curling Season, the school programs and activities as set out in section '5.6 and the development of youth and novice curlers programs;. 1.7. "Curling Facilities" means the Surface, the Private/Dedicated Areas, and the Other Related Facilities, collectively; 1.8. "Curling Season" means the period commencing when the Club begins the installation of the ice on the Surface, in or around August 1 and ending when the ice is removed from the Surface, in or around April 1 each year during the Term; 1.9. "Curling Uses" means the right to use and operate the Curling Facilities granted to the Club by this Agreement, upon and subject to the terms and conditions set out herein and in Schedule "A"; 1.10. "Fiscal Period" means the 12-month period ending March 31 each year, or such other period as the City and the Club may from time to time agree will be treated as the fiscal year of the Club; 1.11. "Health Official" includes the Provincial Health Officer for British Columbia, a health authority, health officer, WorkSafe BC, the British Columbia Center for Disease Control, the Public Health Agency of Canada, and any other governmental or regulatory body whose mandate includes the development and enforcement of Public Health Requirements in response to the COVID-19 pandemic or similar outbreak; 1.12. "Lands" means the lands legally described as PIO 024-715-883 Parcel A Plan P 1strict ot 275, 0 , 6& 08 and District 1 Land District 36 ICE RINK (CAM NEELY ARENA) LOCAL GOV'T ACT EXEMPTION BY-LAW NO 6261-2004 APPLIES 90% (FOR FAIRGROUNDS SEE 84120-0003-0) EXC PORTION LEASED TO STARTING BLOCKS CHILDCARE SEE 84120-0006-0 and with a civic address of 23580 Jim Robson Way, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2W 188; 1.13. "Other Related Facilities" means all of the areas outlined in Schedule "B" as being part of the Curling Facilities, including the lounge, concession, changerooms and Parking and Amenity Area; and excluding: Private/Dedicated Areas; and Surface; i. l -i i r t ! l I I 1. 1-= l-1 -~ I~ 1.14. "Parking and Amenity Area" means the parking stalls, gates, driveways, sidewalks, landscaped areas, and other space as outlined in Schedule "B"; 1.15. "Premises" means the municipally owned building located on the Lands and commonly known as the Golden Ears Winter Club; 1.16. "Private/Dedicated Areas" means the two storage rooms on the lower level and a_pm:tiD...D, _______ -"--of the office area including work stations and filing records on the lower level, outlined as rr:::::::f:·=_~·-_==:_ part of the Curling Facilities as shown in Schedule "B"; 1.17. "Public Health Requirements" means orders, recommendations, and guidelines of a Health Official that are made to reduce the risk of exposore to, transmission of, or infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus during the COVID-19 pandemic or similar outbreak; 1.18. "Operating Surplus" means the excess of the. revenues over expenses for a fiscal year, excluding any revenues realized or expenses incurred bythe Club in connection with hosting or conducting any provincial or national Curling event in the Curling Facilities, provided that out of the operating surplus otherwise determined: (i) The Club may maintain a non-accumulating operating reserve equal to 25% of the total prior years expenses at the end of each Fiscal Period (to be used as operating capital for daily operations Curling Facilities). (ii) The Club may accumulate a capital reserve, to be used for repair and replacement of the Club's furniture and equipment as approved by the City acting reasonably, in the amount, for each Fiscal Period, equal to the sum of: 1.18.a.ii.1. 1.18.a.ii.2. $10,000 plus the addition of: The net profit/surplus realized by the Club in connection with hosting or conducting any provincial or national championship event in the Curling Facilities; Up to an accumulated sum (including interest thereon) of $100,000.00 (this amount to be reviewed and adjusted, subject to approval of both of the parties, at each renewal of this agreement). The said capital reserve will be held by the Club in a separate interest bearing account with a Schedule A or Schedule B Canadian chartered bank, or by any other financial institution approved by the City acting reasonably; 1.19. User Fee" means: (a) $10.00 per year; payable on or before the 15th day of November in each year during the Term, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged; plus (b) 50% of the Operating Surplus after any transfers to the reserve for each Fiscal Period, to be paid to the City on or before the date that is 60 days after the end of the Fiscal Period, the first such payment to be made 60 days after the end of the first Fiscal Period. 1.20. "Summer Season" means the period commencing when the ice is fully removed from the Surface, in or around April 1, and ending when the Club begins to install the ice on the Surface-in or around August 1 in each year of the Term. 1.21. "Surface" means the area used for the curling surface; 1.22. "Lounge" means the lounge and bar area on the second floor, as shown in Schedule "B" 2. GRANT 2.1. The parties confirm that the City of Maple Ridge as owner of the Premises has granted an operating agreement to the Club to use the Curling Facilities for Curling Uses, for and during the Term. 3. TERM 3.1. The Term of this Agreement shall be a period of three (3) years commencing on September 1, 2020 and expiring on August 31, 2023. 4. RENEWAL 4.1. Subject to the observance and performance by the Club of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the Club will have the option to extend the Term for three (3) further periods of three (3) years each for a total of nine (9) years, upon giving notice of its election to do so to the City not later than 180 days prior to the expiration of the initial Term, or of the renewal period then in effect, as applicable. 5. CLUB COVENANTS -The Club agrees with the City: 5.1. To not use or occupy the Curling Facilities at any time or for any other purpose other than Club Operations in accordance with Schedule "A" unless the City has otherwise agreed in writing; 5.2. To provide to the City, within 90 days of each Fiscal Year, financial statements for the Club. If requested by the City the financial statements will be provided with accountant comments or audited by an accredited public accountant acceptable to the City acting reasonably, and will, within 10 business days after request in writing by the City, provide such other financial information and copies of documents, books and records as City may request relative to the affairs and operations of the Club; 5.3. To maintain its status as a not-for-profit society, and remain in good standing with respect to annual returns to be filled and other requirements of the B.C. Societies Act; 5.4. To notify the City in writing prior to implementing any change in its constitution or bylaws; 5.5. To promote and operate a curling development program for youth and novice curlers, to the reasonable satisfaction of the City; 5.6. To, as reasonably requested from time to time by the City, permit the Surface and Other Related Facilities to be used for school curling programs and activities, during the Curling Season, and only during school hours and at times other than those required for Club activities, at minimal cost ($5 per child), and generally support such school programs and activities; provided that such use for those purposes of the Surface during the Curling Season will be limited to activities suitable for a curling surface; -'...""".:_~ -"i I. I 5.7. To allow use of the Other Related Facilities and Surface by the Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association in connection with the country fest and ancillary purposes outside of the Curling Season at no cost to the Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association. 5.8. To provide an account:iDg to the City of all monies related to its operations, as_r_eas_o_o.abJy required by the City from time to time, covering income and expenses, with accountability with respect to generation of revenue including membership fees. 5.9. To set membership fees at an appropriate level, which will be equivalent to or greater than the market average as determined by the City and the Club. If the Club does not consider that the reference clubs selected by the City are reasonable, then the Club may refer the matter for determination by an arbitrator, in accordance with clause 24; 5.10. To allow the City to inspect, after 10 business days notice given by the City to the Club, the financial books and records of the Club and all supporting documents and records; 5.11. To diligently and proficiently manage and operate its affairs and activities; 5.12. To pay the User Fees, throughout the Term including renewals, at times stipulated in this agreement. 5.13. To pay and perform its debts and obligations as they fall due; 5.14. To mitigate the potential of a pandemic, epidemic or other viral outbreak by implementing a Pandemic Plan that includes measures for reducing the risk of exposure to, transmission of, or infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus or similar virus, and that fully complies with all Public Health Requirements. The Club must provide the City with a copy of the Club's Pandemic Plan before using the Curling Facilities. The City is under no obligation to verify that the Pandemic Plan will sufficiently reduce the risk of exposure to, transmission of or infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the Club shall at all times remain solely responsible to ensure that its Pandemic Plan fully complies with all Public Health Requirements. 5.15: To make reasonable best efforts to generate income that exceeds reasonable operation expenses. 5.16. To provide preventative maintenance and replacement as outlined in Schedule "C" during the Term. 6. CITY CONENANTS -The City agrees with the Club to: 6.1. Assign a staff liaison (the "Staff Liaison") who shall be the manager of this Agreement on behalf of the City. 6.2. Provide the Club advertising space in its Parks, Recreation & Culture Guide (the "Guide") equivalent to the space customarily provided for sport programs and services in past issues of the Guide and such other space as may become available as determined by the City, without cost to the Club, and to do its utmost to promote and publicise the Club's -~ ~ . : l : I· I I 1-I-I i I_ f_= L 6.3. programs and services through the distribution of the Guide and any other avenues that may be available and appropriate; Only use and operate the Curling Facilities in accordance with Schedule "A"; 6.4. Provide preventative maintenance and lifecycle replacement as outlined in Schedule "C" ---~d=uring the Term. 7. INSURANCE 7.1. The Club will obtain and maintain such insurance as required by the Agreement. 7.2. The (;Jub will retain third party liability insurance regarding the use of the Curling Facilities for the activities of the Club naming the City, RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) LTD. and the Club as named insureds and otherwise containing such stipulations and coverages as the City may reasonably stipulate and will from time to time at the request of the City provide evidence demonstrating that such insurance is in effect. 7.3. The Club will be solely responsible to insure contents, including all property owned by the Club or its employees, invitees, members and the City will not have any responsibilities therefor. The Club will maintain such content insurance and will from time to time at the request of the City provide evidence demonstrating that such insurance is in effect. 8. INDEMNllY 8.1. The Club will indemnify, defend and save harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and contractors from and against any and all losses, demands, builders liens, liabilities, damages, costs, expenses, indirect or consequential damages (including Joss of profits and loss of use and damage arising out of delays), causes of actions, actions, claims, suits and judgments including all costs of defending or denying the same (including all legal fees on a solicitor and own client basis), which the City may incur or suffer or be put to by reason of or in connection with or arising from (a) the use and occupation of the Curling Facilities by the Club or its members or invitees; (b) the Club Operations; or (c) a breach of this Agreement by the Club. 8.2. The City will indemnify, defend and save harmless the Club, its officers and employees, from and against any and all losses, demands, builders liens, liabilities, damages, costs, expenses, indirect or consequential damages (including loss of profits and loss of use and damage arising out of delays), causes of actions, actions, claims, suits and judgments including all costs of defending or denying the same (including all legal fees on a solicitor and own client basis), which the Club may incur or suffer or be put to by reason of or in connection with or arising from (a) the use and occupation of the Curling Facilities by the City or its elected officials, officers, employees or invitees; (b) or the City Operations; r f· r,.....,..-..,..,..--::-----.·..., ......... ~.,,, :--(c) breach of this Agreement by the City. 9. FORCE MAJEURE If either party is prevented from performing any of its obligations under this Agreement, in whole __ o_r in pa_rt, by reason of force_rnajeure, such party _will be ex_cuse_d_lrom performance for soJong as and to the extent that force majeure will so prevent such performance, provided that such party uses reasonable efforts to restore its ability to perform its obligations hereunder. Any party claiming force majeure will, with reasonable promptness, give to the other party notice of the cause of the force majeure and its expected duration. For purposes of this Agreement, "force majeure" shall include conditions beyond the control of the Parties, including an act of God, acts of terrorism, voluntary or involuntary compliance with any regulation, law or order of any government, war, acts of war (whether war be declared or not), labor strike or lock-out, civil commotion, epidemic, failure or default of public utilities or common carriers, destruction ofproduction facilities or materials by fire, earthquake, storm or like catastrophe. The payment of invoices due and owing hereunder shall in no event be delayed by the payer because of a force majeure affecting the payer. 10. LAWS The Club will comply with all applicable statutes, regulations, by-laws and other laws, and with all reasonable rules and regulations of general application published from time to time by the City, related to the use and occupation of the Curling Facilities. 11. DAMAGE The Club will report all damages caused by the Club or its members or invitees to the Curling Facilities or any equipment therein immediately to the City. The Club will promptly reimburse the City for any damage, reasonable wear and normal wear and tear excepted, caused to the Curling Facilities, or any part thereof, by the Club or its members or invitees. In case of a failure to comply with reasonable rules and regulations published by the Club for the care, safety or protection of individuals, property or Curling Facilities, then the City or Club may expel any individual or group it determines to have caused the breach, or require any individual or group to post a damage deposit or performance bond in such amount as the Club or City may reasonably stipulate, or require any individual or group to pay for or repair any damage or provide such other compensation or restitution as the City may reasonably consider appropriate before allowing such individual or group to enter upon or use the Curling Facilities or the rest of the Facilities again. 12. FOOD AND BEVERAGE In connection with the Curling Facilities, the supply of food and beverages and related services will be provided by the Club and will be the sole purview of the Club during the Curling Season. 13. EQUIPMENT All equipment, supplies, goods and chattels brought onto or into the Curling Facilities by or on behalf of the Club will be the sole responsibility of the Club. Equipment purchased by the City for the Club will remain the property of the City. 14. CURLING SEASON AND SUMMER SEASON OPERATIONS The Club will operate and have the right to rent the Curling Facilities to others during the Curling Season, in accordance with Schedule "A", provided that such other users will be required to comply with the provisions of this Agreement. The Club will allow community use of the facility in accordance will the City's rental policies and procedures and follow the City's fees and charges by'law as amended from time to time by the City. The City reserves the right to operate and rent the Curling Facilities to others in accordance with Schedule "A". During the Summer Season the City will allocate and book dry floor sport use of the facility as part of the annual dry floor allocation process. 15. RENTAL REVENUE FOR SUMMER SEASON OPERATIONS In addition to the portion of rental revenue collected during the Summer Season, the City will pay the Club $20,000 per year to operate the Curling Facilities during the Off-season. This fee for service will be applied firstly to any outstanding debt incurred by the Club owing to the City, after such; payments will be made by four (4) installments in the form of a cheque on May 1st, June 1st, July 1st and August 1st. Rental revenue during the Summer Season will be collected and administered by the City; fees will be applied firstly to any outstanding debt incurred by the Club owing to the City; after the payment of any outstanding debt 85% of the revenue will be shared with the Club through payments of four (4) equal installments in the form of a cheque on May 1st, June 1st, July 1st, and August 1st. 15% of the revenue collected will stay with the City to cover administration costs and rental processing. 16. PARKING During the Term, the Club will have access to the Parking and Amenity Area for itself its employees, contractors, invitees, sub-tenants or licensees. The City will ensure that the Parking and Amenity Area will be maintained, kept clean and tidy, line painted and repaired, by the Arena Operator, to the standard of comparable facilities in the Greater Vancouver Area. 17. SPONSORS The Club will have the right to obtain sponsors, and to post sponsorship and promotional signage and advertising within the Curling Facilities only during the Curling Season. 18.SIGNAGE The Club will be permitted to place and maintain directory and directional signage at the main entrance to the Curling Facilities for the Club, and as reasonably required for bonspiels and events. 19. INSPECTION The City may inspect and will have access to the Curling Facilities at all reasonable times, provided that, with respect to the Private/Dedicated Areas, the City will give reasonable notice to the Club (but notice will not be required if warranted in the case of an emergency). I i I I I ! I f~ f i ' ' -' ' ' ,-~ r i--L I I I I_ I f I I l-1-i l f l ! ~ I 20. LIENS The Club will throughout the Term keep the subject lands free of any builders liens, or other liens or claims of any kind, related to the Club or use or occupation by the Club. In the event that a lien or claim is filed in regard to work done, labour or materials supplied to the subject lands in connection with the Club, or so claimed or alleged, the Club will discharge same within 15 days after reguest made by the City to the Club. The Club will inds;mnify and save harmle~ss the City from and against any builders lien, or other lien or claim of any kind, filed or registered against the subject lands or made or claimed against the City, related to the Club or use or occupation by the Club. 21. ASSIGNMENT Except as expressly permitted.herein, the Club will not mortgage, charge, sell or assign any of its rights in connection with this Agreement or allow any other person or entity to use or occupy or operate the Curling Facilities or any part thereof without the properwritten consent of the City. 22. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION The rights of the Club under this Agreement will terminate on expiry of the Term, and, at the option of the City, the City may terminate the Term upon the happening of any of the following events: 22.1. If the Club fails to observe and perform any of the terms, provisions and stipulations of this Agreement (excluding minor or non-material breaches, provided Club remedies the breaches reasonably diligently and such breaches are not repeatedly reoccurring), and such failure is not remedied within 15 business days after notice given by the City to the Club; or 22.2. If the Curling Facilities are abandoned or vacated, or become occupied or used in whole or in part by any person other than the Club or a permitted assignee, or the Club ceases to operate; or 22.3. Membership in the Club (in this context, "membership" denotes payment in good standing of regular dues by the member and active participation in the curling programs) diminishes to a level which is below 75% of the current level (being 454 such members) or the vitality of the Club diminishes to a level such that the City acting reasonably determines that the dedication of resources represented by the Curling Facilities is unwarranted, excluding any impacts to membership due to COVID19 or similar pandemic, provided that prior to invoking this provision the City will give at least one year's notice to the Club, and the City will reconsider the matter after the year before a final determination is made; or 22.4. The City acting reasonably considers that the Club has not made adequate efforts to generate income, in accordance with clause 5.15 provided that prior to invoking this provision the City will give at least one year's notice to the Club, and the City will reconsider the matter after the year before a final determination is made; or 22.5. The City acting reasonably considers that the Club has failed to adequately perform under clause 5.5 and 5.6 above, provided that prior to invoking this provision the City will give at least one year's notice to the Club, and the City will reconsider the matter after the year before a final determination is made; or r-c 22.6. If a receiver or receiver-manager is appointed in respect of the Club, or a sheriff or bailiff [== seizes assets of the Club, or the rights of the Club hereunder are by any creditor of the \,!_: Club or any order is made for the winding-up of the Club or the Club ceases to maintain r-___________ ,its_c_mp_mate_exis1enc_e_1_o go_o___ct___standlng;_or. _______________________ ___,rc:, f ::~ 22. 7. The Club makes any changes to its constitution or bylaws without the approval of the City; or 22.8. If the Club purports to or attempts to assign its interests hereunder, legally or beneficially, contrary to the stipulations herein. Subject to the rights in section 23, in the event of termination, the City will have the right to acquire all equipment and chattels of the Club used in connection with the Curling Facilities, at a cost equal to the estimated proceeds of liquidation thereof. 23. REMEDIES In the event of any breach, failure or default by the Club hereunder, or termination as provided for under section 22, in addition to all remedies at law or in equity, the City may do any one or combination of the following: 23.1. Enforce the covenants and obligations of the Club hereunder, including seeking specific performance; 23.2. Terminate the rights of the Club under this agreement, and recover damages from the Club for all losses suffered by the City as a result of the Club's breach, failure or default, and enforce the obligations of the Club to indemnify as set out herein; 23.3. Seize all equipment, chattels, and contents in the Curling Facilities, and dispose of them, and apply the proceeds towards monies owned to the City; 23.4. Remedy the breach, failure or default, and engage others to do so, and for that purpose the City may make such payment or enter upon the Curling Facilities, and do or cause to be done such things as the City may reasonably consider expedient or practical; 23.5. Appoint a receiver or receiver-manager; And the Club will pay to the City on demand all costs, charges and expenses paid or incurred by the City in doing so, and the Club will indemnify and save harmless the City from and against all lost, damage, costs, charges and expenses suffered or incurred by the City in doing so. 24. DISPUTES If any dispute shall arise between the parties hereto during the Term and the parties are unable to resolve the dispute, the parties shall jointly appoint a mutually acceptable mediator. The parties agree to participate in good faith in the mediation process for a period of 10 days following the appointment of the mediator, or such other longer period as the parties may agree. If the parties are not successful in resolving the dispute through mediation, then the dispute F-:-ff] [ ~ i=-c I~ ~ !"-5 ! ?~ !~ I,' [ f.~ i" t- shall be settled by a single arbitrator pursuant to the provisions of the of Arbitration Act, (British Columbia), as amended (or its successor statute). The decision of the arbitrator will be final and binding and will not be capable of appeal or judicial review. The costs of the mediation and or arbitration will be shared equally between the parties. Costs will not include costs incurred by a party for representation by counsel. I I I I r i ~' ~ -_ -----~25.__N_O~C=E~--------------------------------~1 Any notice, demand or request of any kind required to be given to any party must be in writing and may be given to or served on the parties hereto by email or by personal service addressed to the party as follows: City Russ Brummer Business Operations Manager City of Maple Ridge Parks, Recreation & Culture 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9 Club Golden Ears Winter Club 23580 Jim Robson Way Maple Ridge, B.C. V2W 188 Email: dean@gewc.ca Attention: General Manager 26. DEVELOPMENT OF LAND The Club will fully cooperate with the City with the development of the new ice pad and/or as to any proposed use or development of the remainder of the Lands (excluding the Curling Facilities). The Club and the City acknowledge that nothing contained in this agreement will operate to in any way restrict the use, alteration or development of the remainder of the Lands not including the Curling Facilities. 27. TIME Time is of the essence. 28. GENERAL 28.1. Section headings are inserted for reference purposes only, and in no way define or limit the scope or intent of this agreement or affect its terms and conditions. 28.2. If any provisions of this agreement is or becomes illegal or unenforceable, then it will be considered separate and severed from this agreement and the remaining provisions will remain in force and be binding upon the parties. 28.3. This agreement will enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Club and its permitted successors and permitted assigns. I-f i r r~ l~ f: I' r:·_ t i r-1 -1~ I I l r l I-r f IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have duly executed this agreement. THE CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE in the presence of: Authorized Signatory Title Authorized Signatory Title THE GOLDEN EARS CURLING CLUB in the presence of: Authorized Signatory Title Authorized Signatory Title Date Witness Date Witness I I-I 1. Uses by the Club SCHEDULE "A" CURLING USES The Club will have exclusive use of the Surface during the Curling Season. · The Club will have exclusive use of the Private/Dedicated Areas, year-round, at all times during the 1erm. The Club will have use of the Other Related Facilities during the Curling Season, subject to clause 2 of this Schedule "A". 2. Uses of Other Related Facilities by the City (a) When not required for use by the Club, the City will have the right to use the Other Related Facilities during the Curling $,eason. (b) The Club and the City will coordinate between them, each acting reasonably, regarding scheduling and use of the Other Related Facilities. The Club will have priority, in scheduling for reasonably required uses anticipated by the Club, subject to the provisions of this Schedule A. The Club may from time to time agree with the City on set allocations of times, for the Other Related Facilities, and if the Club has so agreed with the City then that will be binding on the Club and City. (c) The City may prescribe rules and procedures for coordinating scheduling. If the City considers that it is necessary to do so for the amicable and orderly use of the Other Related Facilities, the City may from time to time establish a schedule allocating set times for the use of the Other Related ·Facilities. (d) The City will be entitled to use of the Surface and Other Related Facilities on one special event day each Curling Season. Provided that a. The special event day will not be New Years day or the day before New Years day; and b. Paragraph 2(a) and 2(c) above will apply, with regard to priority and scheduling therefor. (e) The City will have the use of the Other Related Facilities and the Surface during the Summer Season 3. Managing curling operations, ice maintenance, ice making The following will be in the sole purview of the Club: (a) Managing and administrating curling operations and activities on the Surface during Curling Season; (b) Maintenance of the Surface for curling during the Curling Season; (c) Ice making and removal on the Surface, during the Curling Season; 4. Utilities (a) The Club will make its reasonable best efforts to assist with, and will cooperate with, the Arena Operator regarding energy management grograms and measures, and ujilitys_o_st savings programs and measures, put forward by the Arena Operator, and will make reasonable best efforts to ensure that its members and guests to the same. (b) Notwithstanding the obligation of the Club to pay the cost of all utilities, the City will pay 40% of annual utility costs up to a maximum of $25,000 per year. 5. Cleaning and Maintenance (a) The Parties agree that other than minor repairs, which will be the responsibility of the City in the Summer Season and the responsibility of the Club in the Curling Season, the obligation of Parties to maintain and repair of the Curling Facilities will be as set out in Schedule "C". (b) The Club will be responsible for cleaning of the Curling Facilities during the Curling and Summer Season. (c) The Club may bill for additional cleaning fees following an event including but not limited to the Home Show. (d) The Parties agree that the Curling Facilities will be maintained in accordance with Schedule "C" year-round during the Term. (e) The Club will leave the Other Related Facilities and Surface in a clean and safe condition to the standard of comparable facilities in the Greater Vancouver Area, reasonable wear and tear excepted, for the City at the commencement of the Summer Season. (f) The City will leave the Other Related Facilities and Surface in a clean and safe condition to the standard of comparable facilities in the Greater Vancouver Area, reasonable wear and tear excepted, for the Club at the commencement of the Curling Season. SCHEDULE "B" THE PLAN -GROUND FLOOR THE PLAN -2nd FLOOR ______ Jlr---'"-'-' ---'--'--------------1...... -!->!: r i·.·tc;_i; ,-:..;.!. .... : .. ~ <---·--PARKING MAP SCHEDULE "C" PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR CAPITAL LIFECYCLE AND REPLACEMENT PLAN GEWC = Golden Ears Winter Club CMR = City of Maple Ridge Item Description 1. Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning a Annual inspection b Routine maintenance and repai( C Provision & replacement of filter material d Cleaning ducts e Life Cycle Replacement 2. Plumbing System a Preventative maintenance and repairs to hot water heat systems and domestic cold water systems. b Lifecycle replacement of hot water heating systems and domestic cold water systems. C Repairs to all fixtures including faucets, unplugging toilets and all other routine repairs. 3. Fire Protection & Suppression Systems exclusive to or within the Premises a Fire extinguishers; monthly and annual inspect; repairs, recharging and life cycle replacement b Smoke detectors: monthly and annual inspection; maintenance & repairs and life cycle replacement C Fire alarm system: monthly and annual inspection; maintenance, repairs d Fire alarm system: life cycle replacement e Fire sprinkler system: annual inspection, maintenance, and repairs I i=tre-s-prinkfBT sys-rem. life-cyc~lacement g Smoke vent repairs h Smoke vent life cycle replacement 4. Security System a System monitoring, inspection, maintenance and repair b Life cycle replacement C Repair, replacement, rekeying of all locks 5. Electrical Distribution System a Inspection, maintenance and repair of wiring, breakers, and electrical panels. Responsible to Perform the Work GEWC GEWC GEWC GEWC CMR GEWC CMR GEWC GEWC GEWC GEWC CMR GEWC CMR GEWC CMR GEWC CMR GEWC GEWC Responsible to Pay for the Work GEWC GEWC GEWC GEWC CMR l GEWC CMR GEWC I I GEWC GEWC GEWC CMR GEWC clvrR ,. GEWC 1-CMR r I; GEWC L CMR GEWC GEWC I I_ ---·, I I b Repair or replacement of switches, receptacles and GEWC GEWC i-cover plates. t·I C Lifecycle replacement of wiring panels CMR CMR l d Additional enhancements to meet program and GEWC GEWC h I service's needs, including ongoing maintenance. r J; 6. Lighting Systems exclusive to-or within the Premises i ,. a Bulb/tube replacement for interior lighting. GEWC GEWC ,_ r b Annual inspection and maintenance of interior GEWC GEWC ~--,-emergency/exit lighting. s: l C Interior lighting ballast replacement. GEWC GEWC j· d Cleaning of interior light fixtures. GEWC GEWC L e Lifecycle replacement of interior and emergency/exit CMR CMR Ii-lighting systems. ~~' f Maintenance & repair of exterior lighting (entrance) GEWC GEWC t g Maintenance & repair of exterior lighting (roof line CMR CMR r mounted fixtures) I h Lifecycle replacement of exterior lighting CMR CMR t 7. Interior and Exterior Windows i a Breakage, routine repair and replacement of interior GEWC GEWC r windows b Breakage and routine repairs of exterior windows GEWC GEWC C Life cycle replacement of exterior windows including CMR CMR i-1-awning. 1~-d Cleaning of interior windows and interior surfaces of GEWC GEWC 1~ exterior windows. ., I I e Cleaning of exterior surfaces of exterior windows GEWC GEWC I including awning. I 8. Interior and Exterior Doors l l a Maintenance and repair of interior doors, including GEWC GEWC r L-hardware h b Maintenance and repair of exterior doors including GEWC GEWC ~ ~ hardware ~ C Life cycle replacement of interior and exterior doors, CMR CMR including hardware L d Replacement of interior & exterior doors due to CMR CMR t structural damage (settling of building) f; r:: 9. Interior Surfaces within the Premises I~ a Interior life cycle repainting CMR CMR b Provision, maintenance and cleaning of window GEWC GEWC applications, including but not limited to blinds and curtains .. C Repair of interior walls and ceilings, including minor GEWC GEWC painting d Repair and replacement of ceiling tiles. GEWC GEWC -e Interior repairs due to building system failures such CMR CMR as roof leaks, exterior walls and foundation leaks, 1:• .· 's .. structural damage not caused by the Tenant's occupation or operations f Cleaning, maintenance and repair of floor coverings g Life cycle replacement of floor coverings h Life cycle replacement of structural ceiling infrastructure ~ 10. Major Structural Systems a Maintenance and repairs of foundations, flooring sub-structure, building envelope, including bearing walls, awing and roofing, due to damage related to the tenancy. b Maintenance and repairs of foundations, flooring sub-structure, building envelope, including bearing walls, awing and roofing, due to damage NOT related to the tenancy. C Repairs and painting of exterior surfaces d Repairs and replacement of exterior wir:idows e Exterior lifecycle repainting 11. Exterior Site Services a Landscaping repairs and maintenance b General cleaning of grounds and litter disposal C Snow and ice removal from steps, walkways, entrances, fire exits and loading bay including the provision of de-icing materials d Snow and ice removal with a path to the front entrance of the building e Repairs of water and sewage systems beyond the building perimeter (unless deemed to be caused by the tenant) f Repair and replacement of concrete apron leading up to the building including slope and grading. g Graffiti removal exterior building h Pest control services for exterior areas l2. c:.;uenor s1gnage for ffie t'rem1ses a Maintenance and repair of Golden Ears Winter Club signage b Life Cycle replacement 13. Interior signage within the Premises a Design, installation, maintenance, repair and replacement 14. Audio/Visual Building and Performance Systems a Inspection, maintenance and repair of all audio/visual systems b Lifecycle replacement of all audio/visual systems GEWC GEWC CMR CMR CMR CMR CMR GEWC CMR CMR CMR CMR CMR CMR CMR CMR CMR CMR GEWC GEWC GEWC GEWC GEWC GEWC CMR CMR CMR CMR GEWC GEWC GEWC GEWC GEWC GEWC CMR CMR GEWC GEWC GEWC GEWC GEWC GEWC I / I ' ' ' ' ' ' I t I t l l l---l_-r ~ r 15. Janitorial services within the premises a Routine janitorial/custodial services GEWC GEWC b Provision of routine washroom supplies GEWC GEWC C Pest control services (interior) GEWC GEWC 16. Appliances, Program and Other Non-Installed Equipment within the Premises a Inspection, maintenance and repair of all non-GEWC GEWC building equipment including stoves, refrigerators, microwaves, coolers, free standing cabinets, track lighting b Replacement of all appliances, program and non-GEWC GEWC installed equipment C Maintenance, repair and replacement of furniture GEWC GEWC d Replacement life cycle of curling rocks GEWC GEWC 17. Renovations and Upgrades within the Premises a Any standard renovations, alterations, upgrades, GEWC GEWC additions, enhancements or improvements beyond what was originally provided during construction (subject to prior. approval by CMR) b. Improvements to meet needs of user groups outside CMR CMR the Curling Club 18. Business Operations a Staff Costs GEWC GEWC b Telephone, internet and cable services GEWC GEWC C Insurance (in accordance to Clause 7) GEWC GEWC d Supplies and equipment, including bathrooms, GEWC GEWC kitchen and meeting rooms, where applicable e Annual pumping of melted ice pit. CMR CMR Lifecycle · Replacement Lifecycle replacement is based on actual condition and wear and tear and is the responsibility of the City. The City will review with the Club and if the Curling Facilities are found to be in need of system -------=re=placement, e C1 y wilrae ermine w e er o rep ace t e wor s considering the cost o t e replacement, the availability of funds, the collective goal to prolong the life of Curling Facilities and any other factors relevant to the City's decision. The Club is responsible to apply for infrastructure grants to support lifecycle replacement. ~~-'" r-, .. ' -,. ' ,. ' ,_ ' ,. ,_ ' ,_-;._ 1-._; r-.--1-:._~-!~~ r-....;::.:; = r-_-_ ,_ '. ~:~ ~;;~--TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Metro Vancouver Greenways Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE MEETING DATE: September 1, 2020 FILE NO: 01-0640-30-2020 MEETING: CoW The vision of Metro Vancouver's Regional Greenways Plan is to provide a region wide seamless network of recreation greenways and trails that showcase the beauty of the region. Metro Vancouver staff has requested that the City of Maple Ridge staff provide input for an update to the Regional Greenways Plan as contained within the Metro Vancouver 2040 Regional Growth Strategy. Metro Vancouver Parks is looking to partner with the member municipalities to provide updates to the existing regional recreational greenway network plan and to implement the regional greenways plan where feasible. The draft greenways planning document (Attachment A) and map included have been reviewed by Parks Planning & Development staff with recommended trail connections (Attachment B) to align the greenways routes with existing trail networks within Maple Ridge. Staff are providing the draft greenways report for information and recommending that feedback be provided to Metro Vancouver staff as part of the engagement process. RECOMMENDATION: narffie recommendooupcates to tne Metro Vancouver Regional-Greenways Plan on tne deta1lec:I greenways route plan be provided to Metro Vancouver Parks for their consideration. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The intent of the regional greenways plan is to provide a shared 30 year vision for a regional network of recreational greenways for walking, cycling, and, where appropriate, horse riding. 1172 2491224 Page 1of 3 _, Process In October of 2019, Metro Vancouver convened a meeting with member municipalities and key stakeholders as part of a review and update of the Regional Greenways Plan. The updated greenways plan and mapping will be presented at a Metro Vancouver Regional Parks Commission meeting and eventually be included in the Metro Vancouver 2050 Regional Growth Strategy. Engagement Engagement with member municipalities included a staff working group session held in the fall of 2019 as well as by forwarding the draft greenways plan to stakeholders to provide feedback. Metro Vancouver's approach to engagement with elected officials was through the distribution of a report to their Regional Parks Committee for feedback. Implications The Parks Planning & Development Department is tasked with delivering trails and greenways, often through the development process to provide community trail connections. With staff's suggested edits (See attachment B) to the Draft Regional Greenways Plan, the proposed regional greenway routes will largely complement existing trail networks which reduces capital expenditures needed to complete the connections. Connections that are needed could be potentially delivered through the rezoning process as opportunities arise and developed when other capital project opportunities exist. The Draft Regional Greenways Plan also embeds the Canyon to Coast trail route which follows the Fraser River foreshore from Hope to the Salish Sea. ' i !_ I I I l l i I b) Strategic Alignment: , Review and input into a regional greenways plan aligns with Council's Strategic Priorities of f Growth, Inter-Government Relations and Natural Environment. The Parks, Recreation & [ I Culture Master Plan (2010) also includes direction to prepare a comprehensive greenways r i plan for biking, cycling and equestrian use. j c) Interdepartmental Implications: I I The Engineering (Tranfsportation), Communftity Planning an1 d EncvironmentfDepartments were l:, _ consulted to develop eedback on the dra greenways pan. omments ram these various = departments have been included in the greenways plan map updates as shown on Attachment t (B). The Engineering Department noted that the Strategic Transportation Plan is being updated F----------a=n~ac,-ctJlarrnere may be adcHl'.lonal consicferations ana-impacts as tnese plans int=eg=r=a=te~a=n=a~a=re~----~ri developed and implemented. m I d) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Greenway infrastructure, specifically trails, multi-use paths and pedestrian connections are typically delivered through the development and rezoning process and where there is a fit through Maple Ridge and Metro Vancouver Parks capital projects, however, financial implications are not anticipated at this time. 2491224 Page 2 of 3 if CONCLUSION: Metro Vancouver Park's staff have prepared an update to the Regional Greenways Plan to provide a shared vision for a regional network of recreational greenways for walking, cycling, and, where appropriate, horse riding. Parks Planning & Development Staff have reviewed this plan and would like to provide recommended changes to Metro Vancouver Parks on the detailed greenways routing. Prepared by: Chad Neufeld, MBCSLA Manager of Parks Planning & Development Reviewed by:Vkree Richmond, MBCSLA Director of Parks & Facilities David Bo~ General r.anager Par s, Recreation & Culture Al Horsman Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: (A) DRAFT Metro Vancouver Regional Greenways Plan (B) Updates to Regional Greenways Plan 2491224 Page 3 of3 I metrovancouver Regional Greenways 2050 March 13, 2020 ~--r--... _ -·~ -----=:--·--=-=--Regional Greenways 2050 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 3. 3 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 3 GREENWAY$ IN METRO VANCOUVER ............................................................................................... 3 CHALLENGES .......................................................................................................................................... 4 BENEFITS ................................................................................................................................................ 6 METRO VANCOUVER CONTEXT .......................................................................................................... 7 INTER-REGIONAL TRAILS ...................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 EXPERIENCE THE FRASER ..................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 THE GREAT TRAIL .................................................................................................................................. 8 3.3 LOCHSIDE REGIONAL TRAIL ................................................................................................................. 8 3.4 INTERNATIONAL TRAIL NETWORKS .................................................................................................... 8 4 THE REGIONAL GREENWAYS PLAN ..................................................................................................... 9 4.1 VISION .................................................................................................................................................... 9 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 5 6 7 8 PLAN GOALS .......................................................................................................................................... 9 PLAN CRITERIA ................................................................................................... ." ................................. 10 GREENWAY NETWORK ....................................................................................................................... 11 EXISTING CO DITTDl\fS---=-GR--rrf\JWATOPERATfONATSTATlJS-IVIA--P ............................................. P ROLES ................................................................................................................................................... 16 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES AND 5 YEAR ACTION PLAN ......................................................... 16 TRACKING PERFORMANCE ................................................................................................................ 18 AP PEN DIX A: DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................. 18 APPENDIX B: REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 20 ' -' ' ,_ t ~* ,: ' ' '-' ,_ r:_ 1----[~.: fl r-1-~ r--- Regional Greenwavs 2050 1 SUMMARY To be added: A brief summary of the key points of the plan. 2 INTRODUCTION Greenways promote regional liveability by supporting active living, connecting natural areas and communities, and providing opportunities to protect and restore ecosystems. In 1999 the Metro Vancouver Regional District Board adopted a regional vision for a network of recreational greenways for Metro Vancouver. Since then Metro Vancouver, its member municipalities, Translink, other government agencies, and stakeholders have made significant progress in realising that vision. Developing the regional greenway network will provide residents with additional routes for walking and cycling. Recent research has found that developing new trails in neighbourhoods will replace a proportion of short vehicle trips for work and shopping and avoid the emission of greenhouse gases associated with motor vehicles. Through this period Metro Vancouver's and Translink's roles have evolved in a complementary manner. Presently Metro Vancouver works to develop recreational trails that support walking, cycling, and, where appropriate, horse riding, while Translink works to develop transportation bikeways that support commuting, shopping, and work. Additionally, municipalities provide both segments of the regional greenway network as well as neighbourhood and community scale connectors. Other regional jurisdictions, such as the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, provide important bridge crossings, linkages to ferries and support cycling on highways when suitable. After more than two decades it was time to review the regional greenways network. This plan is the result of a collaborative effort and describes an updated vision for the region's network of regional recreational greenways as well as actions that will guide implementation. Nine-in-ten 89%) Metro Vancouver residents eel it is important that multi-use pathways are present in their community, including 57% who feel it is very important (Bird, G. 2019). 2.1 GREENWAY$ IN METRO VANCOUVER The history of regional greenway planning and development in Metro Vancouver began over a century ago when the City of Vancouver started construction on the Stanley Park Seawall. The next major milestone was the opening of the BC Parkway, Metro Vancouver's first multi-community connecting bikeway, for Expo 86. Broad support for a network of regional --~.: ,.-Regional Greenways 2050 greenways emerged in the following decade when a flurry of greenway planning initiatives undertaken by local municipalities and the regional district culminated in the adoption of the Greater Vancouver Regional Greenway Vision in 1999. With the 2011 inclusion of a regional greenway network in Metro 2040, the regional growth strategy, the greenway concept was embedded in regional development plans. 1917 Construction of the Stanley Park Seawall commenced. 1929 A network of green corridors connecting the region for recreational driving was proposed in Vancouver's Bartholomew Plan. 1966 Metro Vancouver identified a number of regional trail routes in its master plan for the new regional parks system (The Major Parks Plan). 1986 The BC Parkway was constructed as part of Expo 86 transportation infrastructure development. 1992 The City of Vancouver's Urban Landscape Task Force urged the establishment of a network of greenway corridors to link public open space in its Greenways-Public Ways report. 1995 Vancouver adopted its City Greenways Plan the first of its type in the region. 1996 The Metro Vancouver Board adopted the Liveable Region Strategic Plan-the region's first growth strategy-which included a plan for a network of recreational trails. 1999 The Metro Vancouver Board adopted the Greater Vancouver Regional Greenway Vision which more fully described the region's goal of a network of recreational greenways." 2004 The adoption of regional greenway sector plans concluded. 2011 The Metro Vancouver Board, 21 municipalities and Translink adopted Metro 2040 -the current regional growth strategy-which included a reference map of a regional recreational greenway network. 2.2 CHALLENGES Regional jurisdictions (all government agencies working in the region: Metro Vancouver, Translink, municipalities, the Province of British Columbia and the Government of Canada) and other stakeholders have made significant progress on the development of the regional greenway network over the past two decades; however, during this time a number of challenges to progress have made the update of the greenway plan timely. • Securing Land Tenure -Acquiring trail corridors has been a significant challenge for many jurisdictions over the years. High urban land prices, historic development patterns, and a reliance on the willing seller-willing buyer land acquisition principle has led to incremental but slow progress in many parts of the region. An updated greenway plan can support acquisition through improved regional policy, clarified stakeholder roles and a refreshed implementation framework. ' r--.: ,_-r ' ' '. '-· ' _. < C ' I ! I i. i': I I I i 1: I -I I· I ! .; I_; r, l L~ ~..: r Regional Greenways 2050 • Competing land uses-In a highly urbanized region, it can be a challenge to integrate greenways into the existing development patterns despite the benefits to people who live and work in these areas. Regional jurisdictions may need to take greater care during greenway site selection, design and operations to address potential concerns by owners of adjacent agricultural and industrial lands. An updated greenway plan and its companion documents can help identify design and communication approaches to optimize the integration of regional greenways with these communities. • Loss of the Natural Environment-Regional urban development pressure has resulted in the loss and fragmentation of natural areas. This loss of ecosystem connectivity threatens regional biodiversity, resiliency of urban wildlife, and ecosystem services. Realization of the regional greenway network can help protect some of these remaining natural areas and promote ecosystem connectivity. • Funding Development-Funding for greenway development has commonly been obtained from various sources including: engineering, transportation, and parks budgets, Translink, Provincial and Federal grants, and community amenity contributions from private developers. New collaborative funding mechanisms could be explored to facilitate implementation of an updated plan. • Responding to Climate Change -Climate change is affecting our region in profound ways. Specifically, it's making summers hotter and drier, winters warmer and wetter, and increasing the occurrence of extreme weather events. A coordinated regional greenway program can support climate change mitigation and adaptation through greenhouse gas avoidance and environmental resiliency improvements such as natural area protection and ecosystem restoration. • Accommodating Urban Growth & Maintaining Liveability -With an anticipated 1.2 million new residents moving to Metro Vancouver by 2050, maintaining or improving regional liveability will be a significant challenge for regional jurisdictions. Expanding the regional greenway network can play an important role in supporting active living, imp,011ing"tfre-a-ctive-transpmtatiarrnetwork;am:l-prote-cting-and-restorin·g-mtt1ral-a-reac--.---------+-• Growing Demand for Comfortable Cycling Facilities -Preliminary results from HU B's 2019 State of Cycling report show that cycling trips in Metro Vancouver have grown in the last 10 years from 1.7 % to 2.3 % of all regional commute trips. While the cycling network has increased by 237% since 2010, much ofthat infrastructure is not comfortable for all people. The bicycle infrastructure that is safe, secure, and accessible for everyone is still fragmented and doesn't yet fully link key destinations with residential areas (HUB, 2019). Because regional greenways tend to be safe, secure, and accessible, an updated regional greenways plan can help focus the efforts of regional jurisdictions on filling these important gaps in the recreation and transportation cycling network. 2.3 BENEFITS Regional Greenways 2050 A large majority {87%} of regional residents have used a multi-use pathway for walking, cycling, other leisure activities, or to get somewhere (Bird, G. 2019}. • Physical and Emotional Health -Regional greenways provide residents opportunities to be active outdoors and connect with nature, which has been demonstrated to improve physical and mental health. According to the Where Matters {2019} research project findings people who live in neighbourhoods with more parks are healthier than those in areas with fewer parks. They are 43% less likely to be obese, 37% less likely to have diabetes, 39% less likely to have heart disease, and 19% less likely to have stressful days. Developing a regional greenway network can help residents access these benefits more equitably. • Protect Nature & Support Restoration and Green Infrastructure-Regional greenways provide opportunities to connect important natural areas, restore damaged ecosystems and integrate urban landscaping/ engineered green infrastructure. Developing the regional greenway network will protect some of the region's remaining natural areas, improve ecosystem connectivity, support biodiversity, and provide space for ecological restoration and green infrastructure development. • Climate Change Mitigation -Greenways can contribute to lowering greenhouse gas emissions and improving air quality by replacing trips by fossil-fuel powered vehicles. Cars and trucks are one of the most significant producers of greenhouse gas emissions (32%) in _____________ th_e_re~gion and a significant source of smog forming emissions (16%). A recent study in the City of Vancouver found the daily transportation greenhouse gas emissions decreased by just over 20% for residents living near a greenway compared to before the greenway's construction. This was associated with a reduction in vehicle kilometers traveled (Ngo et al. 2018). Development of the regional greenway network can help the region achieve its greenhouse gas reduction target. • More Opportunities for Active Transportation -Regional greenways provide residents with safe and comfortable opportunities to walk and cycle. Ensuring the recreational greenway network links to the major bike network, frequent transit network, and municipal greenways will provide increased opportunities for active transportation across the region. L Regional Greenways 2050 • Better tourist experiences and opportunities for business development-recreational greenways support economic development by maintaining the livability of regional communities and providing recreational amenities that make the region a more desirable place to work, live, and visit. One study estimated the annual economic impact of cyclists to be almost nine times as much as the one-time expenditure of public funds to construct bicycle facilities in the region (Laurie, G. 2004). 3. METRO VANCOUVER CONTEXT Metro Vancouver is a federation of 21 municipalities, one electoral area and one treaty First Nation. It provides sustainable regional services that contribute to a livable and resilient region, and a healthy natural environment. The regional district accomplishes this by serving as the regional federation, delivering core services, and planning for the region. The Regional Greenways Plan supports several goals outlined in the 2019-2022 Board Strategic Plan including: strengthening our livable region, fostering collaboration and engagement, taking leadership on climate action, and advancing Regional Parks' mission and vision to protect natural areas and connect people with them. Between 2001 and 2016, the regional population grew from 1.9 million to 2.5 million people and regional growth is expected to add another 1.2 million people by 2050. Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping Our Region (Metro 2040), the regional growth strategy, represents the collective vision for how the region is going to accommodate this growth. Metro 2040 includes a recreational greenway network reference map and a number of policy statements that support the realisation of this greenway network vision. Metro Vancouver's Climate 2050 policy guides regional action on climate change for the next 30 years. The Metro Vancouver Regional District Board's goal is to become a carbon neutral region by 2050 and set an interim target of 45% reduction by 2030 (compared to 2010 levels). Metro Vancouver's Ecolo ical Health Framework has a vision to achieve "a beautiful, healthy, and resilient environment for current and future generations". The Regional Greenways Plan supports Ecological Health Framework strategies that aim to enhance ecosystem connectivity, conserve habitat for species and ecosystems, promote green spaces within communities, and increase natural and built green infrastructure. The BC Active Transportation Design Guide was released by the Province in 2019 in support of its recently adopted Active Transportation Strategy. The design guide is an excellent information source for greenway planning and design. Regional Greenways 2050 3 INTER-REGIONAL TRAILS A number of other trail plans have been developed over the years by other agencies and jurisdictions. The Regional Greenways Plan took these plans into consideration during its development and incorporates or responds to the existing and planned trails identified in those plans to support recreational and touring trips outside of the region. This includes links to the BC Ferry system and international airport. 3.1 EXPERIENCE THE FRASER Experience the Fraser (ETF) is a recreational, cultural and heritage project that extends along the Lower Fraser River Corridor from Hope to the Salish Sea. It seeks to fill connectivity gaps and add to the experiences available along the river. The "Canyon to Coast Trail" portion of the project is 550 kilometres of trail linking communities and points of interest on both sides of the river. About 43% of this proposed trail is already in place with segments provided by regional districts, municipalities and others. The Canyon to Coast Trail is strongly aligned with the regional greenway network and including it in the greenways plan will support recreational trips from Hope to the Salish Sea. 3.2 THE GREAT TRAIL The Great Trail, also known as the Trans Canada Trail, is over 24,000 kilometres of multi-use trails that links Canada and Canadians. The Great Trail traverses Metro Vancouver communities and portions of it align with regional greenway routes. 3.3 LOCHSIDE REGIONAL TRAIL Located a short ferry trip from Metro Vancouver on Vancouver Island and operated by the Capital Regional District, the Lochside Regional Trail is a 29 km long multi-use trail located predominantly ---------,0n-a-f-ermer---r-ai1way-lifle-tl'lat-lirtks-5w-ar-t-z--B--ay---te-V-iet0ri-a-;-4-he-tr-a+Hmer-seeis-with-the-Gall0-pifl,,__ --------+-Goose Regional Trail, a 55 km former railway line from Victoria to Sooke. This comfortable and scenic trail has a gentle grade and is a popular destination for Metro Vancouver cyclists. 3.4 INTERNATIONAL TRAIL NETWORKS Metro Vancouver borders on Washington State along its south east edge where three crossings of the international boundary with the United States are located. The Peace Arch Crossing near Blaine, Washington provides opportunities for Metro Vancouver cyclists to link onto the Whatcom County trail network. ~-=--=-= Regional Greenways 2050 4 THE REGIONAL GREENWAYS PLAN Regional greenways are linear corridors that contain trails, often multi-use, which are for the most part physically separated from road traffic. They connect multiple regional parks, communities and other important natural areas and protect ecosystem services. Six-in-ten (59%} of trail visitors say they use multi-use pathways without a particular destination in mind (just to get exercise, etc.). One-half (50% to 51%) cite scenic viewpoints or parks and cultural destinations as their destination. (Bird, G. 2019) This section describes the region's shared 30-year vision for a regional network of recreational greenways for walking, cycling, and, where appropriate, horse riding. Facilitated by Metro Vancouver, municipal jurisdictions, Trans link, the Province, Canada, and key stakeholders came together to update the plan. The updated plan includes a revised vision statement, updated goals, a map of the regional greenways network, a description of the roles, and a five-year action plan to guide implementation. 4.1 VISION The region wide seamless network of recreational greenways and trails is the best way to experience the beauty of the region This vision statement guides Metro Vancouver, its member jurisdictions and other key regional stakeholders in the collaborative implementation of the Regional Greenway Network. It establishes a shared goal of a network of regional multi-use paths for walking, cycling and, where appropriate, horse riding that is safe, secure, accessible for users and free of gaps. 4.2 PLAN GOALS This section describes the planning framework (goals and criteria) used to identify the greenway network through the collaborative planning process. I I -I I: 1-1, I t r~-, __ I I r2-Regional Greenways 2050 Greenway Goals No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Key Word Proposed Goal Connect nature Connect people with regionally important natural areas and scenic views. Connect Connect communities and regionally important destinations. communities Protect Enhance regional ecosystem connectivity by protecting natural areas and enhancing green space along greenways and trails. Experience Provide a diversity of greenway experiences that are comfortable for most ages and abilities. Economy Support regional economic development and tourism. Collaborate Develop and implement the plan collaboratively. Nearly half {47%} of Metro Vancouver residents selected scenic viewpoints and 34% chose large parks as their top two destinations for multi-use paths {Bird, G. 2019}. 4.3 PLAN CRITERIA The following set of criteria was developed to analyze existing or planned municipal and regional greenway routes and identify a network of regionally important greenways. These criteria were informed by the above goal statements and tested during the collaborative planning process. • Critena1:Connects reg1onally1mportant natura areas, communities andaes ina ions to eacfi other with a trail separated from vehicle traffic. • Criteria 2: Connects two or more adjacent municipalities/ regions directly or via bridges, ferries and tunnels with a trail separated from vehicle traffic. • Criteria 3: Located adjacent to regionally significant natural, cultural, & scenic values (e.g., marine headlands and beaches, Fraser River, mountains.) • Criteria 4: Enables recreational trips of varying lengths and a diversity of experiences. In order to achieve a seamless network, not every route meets all of the criteria. Additionally, a number of gaps in greenway route planning were identified. The proposed network includes links to fill these gaps where required. Regional Greenways 2050 4.4 GREENWAY NETWORK The Regional Greenway Network is a 30-year vision for recreational trails that support walking, cycling, and, where appropriate, horse riding (Map 1). The Major Bike Network is primarily targeted to transportation cycling. The two networks are complimentary and together increase the reach of both initiatives. ~-~-;:~-~~ -I I I r Regional Greenway Network ; -----~---·-····J 1.1 J -Regional Greenway Network --Transllnk Major Bike Network Roads ---Municipal Boundaries Disclaimer; This map desqtbes the feedback of p.11rtldp;:mls at the October 3, 2019 regkmal recreatlonal greenways workshop. The planned and ~lstlna grffnway routes shown were though! to bt •regionalty sigrilftcant' b1st-d on dnft plJ1nnJn, alterla pro\/Jded by Metro vancouve.r. ~ maps are to be used only to confirm and clarify regional reuea1fonal grN!nwayworkshop sbkehOtder fudback. Sqllulh~b,• .... l'UJ'\ (roviN:ifdP1,t ::. ·--~·-·--·-------··1 ~I ! i I !"J ! ' ,. ' ' -1-:::::: , __ ' !~. 1---:C ,. ,_ ,. ! l· ! ~-4.5 EXISTING CONDITIONS-Greenway Operational Status Map Regional jurisdictions have made significant progress constructing the regional greenway network since planning started in the 1990's. Map 2 identifies the portions of the greenway network which are fully operational, planned or new proposed segments to fill an identified gap. {Note to reviewer-operational status should be reviewed by appropriate municipal staff to confirm data accuracy). I 1~ I I ! I f ' I r I":: F-: 1:-,c 1-.-1.-.-,. ' ' . I Greenway Network Operational Status Greenway Network Openttional Stotus -Operational -Previously Planned Proposed New --Munlcipal Boundaries Regional Park Parks & Protected Areas N Ao •-•2c.s==----10 KHometers -------l-n"',icmii1~me~r:~1~rus~m>jl"""dmtlbUlhlrflldtiRt'?itpl1tltJIIJnu"'lnM1)(f0b:8T,101i!,-----jff=";"'tf--~~--------\c-=r'.:::'.:'P"""'"!-----f=---Hf-"i~=.::....---------l+._ .. _=--------j-----+-,ef10nal tKtt.,)tJONlgreenwli"yS wor\.shop.. The plaMed and exlslfnC a,een~ routH shown ..,,._,_ wtrt! thoucht 10 be •reglonally slgniflcanl• ~ on draft ptannq crtte,!a pr~kSed by Metro Vaocower, The impl ;,re to be used orily 10<0nf1rm and clDrify rqional recrNtlonal 1rNnwavwo,Uhop stakeholder fttdbx.k. Regional Greenways 2050 4.6 Roles This section outlines the roles of Metro Vancouver, member jurisdictions, and key stakeholders. The table helps set the context for the following implementation section and ensure that proposed actions are consistent with the roles of the various regional stakeholders. Stakeholder Metro Vancouver Municipalities Translink Provincial Government Federal Government NGO's Role ..... QJ C QJ > C 0 u ..... QJ C C ro CL Q.J .._. ro u 0 > "C <( ..... QJ > a. u O -0 QJ CL ~ 0 ..... Q.J ..c u ..... ro QJ Vl QJ 0:::: This section identifies the roles required to support the implementation of this plan and a set of short term actions outlining the implementation efforts for each stakeholder group for the following 5 years. Note to reviewers -This draft only shows Metro Vancouver's proposed 5 year actions. Please identify any actions that your munidpality or agency would commit to in the next 5 years to support implementation of the regional green way network. The following version of the plan will include implementation actions that reflect this input. I Regional Greenways 2050 Role Potential Five Vear Actions for Metro Vancouver Convene & • Support Climate 2050 development and implementation ' Collaborate • Support Transport 2050 development • Support City of Vancouver, Burnaby and New Westminster efforts on the False Creek to Fraser River Blueway • Collaborate with other jurisdictions and stakeholders to build greenway segments Promote & • Promote the collaborative implementation of the regional greenways plan Advocate • Promote the development and implementation of consistent greenway branding and way-finding standards Plan & Policy Regional Parks: • Adopt a Regional Parks Greenway Network Plan • Commence conceptual and detailed planning for priority segments of current Regional Parks greenway routes (examples include Delta South-Surrey Regional Greenway and Brunette Fraser Regional Greenway) • Update Regional Parks design standards as required • Update Regional Parks Land Acquisition 2050 strategy with greenway lands • Initiate planning for new Regional Parks greenway routes (for example the Sea Island Regional Greenway and the Burnaby Lake South connection) Other Metro Vancouver departments: • Include the Regional Greenways Network map and supporting policies in the updated Regional Growth Strategy, Metro 2050 • Include greenway trails in utility project planning if appropriate • Identify opportunities for regional greenways within Metro Vancouver utility corridors Build • Secure tenure to Regional Parks greenway routes I • Design Metro Vancouver Regional Parks greenways I • Construct priority regional greenwa~gments located in regional parks (example: Aldergrove Regional Park Rock 'N' Horse Trail) Operate • Operate and maintain Regional Parks' greenways Educate & Inform • Track and report regional greenway network implementation progress every five years • Publish Board adopted greenways plan online Fund • Establish a Regional Parks greenway program with tax requisition funding • Explore Regional Parks Development Cost Charges (DCC) program to expand support for Regional Parks greenway development • Explore options for obtaining a proportion of regional allocation of Federal Gas Tax funding for regional greenway development. • Seek available capital grants when available Regional Greenways 2050 Potential Five year action tables for municipalities and other stakeholders to be included here in complete draft 6 TRACKING PERFORMANCE Promoting the completion of the Regional Greenway Network requires periodic reporting on the progress of the various partners in finishing their actions in the collaborative implementation framework described previously. In addition to tracking the completion of major milestones such as the adoption of plans, policies, or standards documents, the progress report will measure success in filling the missing pieces in the trail network. The report will be published every five years by Metro Vancouver as part of the implementation plan update process. 7 APPENDIX A: DEFINITIONS Ecosystem services: These are the benefits people obtain from ecosystems. Ecosystem connectivity: The physical and functional links between ecosystems that support biodiversity by allowing movement of species across the region. Green infrastructure: The natural, enhanced, and engineered assets that collectively provide society with ecosystem services required for healthy living. Regional Greenway (Regional Parks Land Acquisition 2050): Regional greenways are linear corridors that contain trails, often multi-use, which are for the most part physically separated from road traffic. They connect multiple regional parks, communities and other important natural areas and protect ecological services. Regional jurisdictions: All government jurisdictions and agencies affiliated with Metro Vancouver, Translink, municipalities, the Province of British Columbia and the Government of Canada. Regionally Important Natural Area: The large natural areas protected primarily by government jurisdictions. ey incluae regional parl<s, provincial parl<s, national par s, eco ogical reserves, wi1clltferrm11-a-g-eme1Ttcll'Fcfs, private protected areas and large natural municipal parks. Important Destinations: The regional facilities within communities that are highly sought after tourist or leisure destinations. They include museums, aquariums, national historic sites, cultural facilities or features, sports venues and scenic villages (e.g., Steveston). The Major Bike Network (MBN): Translink's cohesive, well-connected network of major bikeways. It connects urban centres, reinforces important high-volume local routes and serves longer-distance commuting and recreational trips. The MBN will: a. parallel the rapid transit network and provide high-quality connections to transit stations, urban centres and regional transportation gateways; b. consists primarily of Class 1 and 2 bikeways (see Table 7); Regional Greenways 2050 c. be distinctly marked and identified through consistent design elements and a coordinated wayfinding system; and d. integrates with Metro Vancouver's Regional Recreational Greenway Network and existing inter-regional trails and bikeways. The Regional Greenways Network (RGN): The region's network of recreational greenways which support recreational walking, cycling, and, where appropriate, horse riding. Transportation cycling: Cycling on the regional greenway and bike networks to commute, shop, work, or for other specific purposes. Recreational cycling: Cycling on the regional greenway and bike networks for fun or exercise often with no specific destination. Regional Greenways 2050 8 APPENDIX B: REFERENCES Bird, G. 2019. Multi-use Pathway Survey. Justason Market Intelligence Inc. Frank, et al, 2019. Where Matters: Health and Economic Impacts of Where We Live. Vancouver, Canada. UBC. Frisch, M. 2019. Economic Impact Analysis of the Kansas City, Mo. Bicycle Master Plan: Summary of Findings. Urban Planning+ Design, University of Missouri Kansas City. Lawrie, J. 2004. Pathways to Prosperity; Economic Impacts of Investment in Bicycle Facilities: A Case Study of North Carolina Northern Outer Banks. North Carolina Department of Transportation. Metro Vancouver, 2011. Metro 2040: Shaping Our Future. Vancouver, Canada: Metro Vancouver. Metro Vancouver, 2019. Climate 2050: Strategic Framework. Vancouver, Canada: Metro Vancouver. Ngo, et al, 2018. Effects of new urban greenways on transportation energy use and greenhouse gas emissions: A longitudinal study from Vancouver, Canada. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. Volume 62, July 2018, Pages 715-725. Translink, 2011. Cycling for Everyone -A Regional Cycling Strategy for Metro Vancouver. Vancouver, Canada: Translink. Translink, & HUB Cycling (2019). Benchmarking the State of Cycling in Metro Vancouver. Vancouver, Canada: Translink.