Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-01-18 Committee of the Whole Agenda and Reports (Amended).pdfCity of Maple Ridge COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA January 18, 2022 11:00 a.m. Virtual Online Meeting including Council Chambers Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more information or clarification before proceeding to Council. The meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge. For virtual participation during Community Forum please go to www.mapleridge.ca/640/Council-Meetings and select the meeting date. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 2.1 Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting of January 11, 2022 3. DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS 4. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Note: • Owners and/or Agents of development applications on this agenda may be permitted to speak to their item with a time limit of 10 minutes. • The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda where further debate and voting will take place, upon Council decision to forward them to that venue. 1101 2019-119-RZ, 12791 232 Street, RS-2 to CS-1 Staff report dated January 18, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019 to redesignate the land use from Agricultural to Commercial be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019 to rezone from RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to CS-1 (Service Commercial) to permit the future construction of a two -storey commercial building be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Committee of the Whole Agenda January 18, 2022 Page 2 of 6 1102 2019-239-RZ, 12610 228 Street, RS-3 to R-1 Staff report dated January 18, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7574-2019, to rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential), to permit a future subdivision of approximately eight lots over two phases be given second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. 1103 2021-062-RZ, 25927 and 25801 128 Ave, Outdoor Commercial Recreation Staff report dated January 18, 2022, recommending first and second reading of Official Community Plan Bylaw 7715-2021, second reading of Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7716-2021, and that both be forwarded to Public Hearing, to permit an Outdoor Commercial Recreation (outdoor paintball and laser tag) use. 1104 2021-470-RZ, 12954 Mill Street, RS-3 and RS-2 to R-2 and R-1 Staff report dated January 18, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7819-2021 to rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) and RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) and R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential), to permit a future subdivision of approximately seven lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B, E, F, G and J of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. 1105 2021-514-RZ, 11204, 11208, 11214 Charlton Street and 20318 Lorne Avenue, RS-1 to RM-1 Staff report dated January 18, 2022 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7820-2021 to rezone from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential), to permit the future construction of approximately 16 townhouse units, be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules D and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1106 2021-530-RZ, 11410 207 Street, RS-1 to RT-2 Staff report dated January 18, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7816-2021, to rezone from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RT-2 (Ground -Oriented Residential Infill), to permit the future construction of a Fourplex be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in Schedules A, C, and D of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. Committee of the Whole Agenda January 18, 2022 Page 3 of 6 1107 2021-563-RZ, 21211 Wicklund Ave, RS-1 to RT-1 Staff report dated January 18, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7817-2021 to rezone from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RT-1 (Two -Unit Urban Residential), to permit the future construction of a duplex, be given first reading and that the applicant provides further information as described on Schedule B of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1108 2021-571-RZ, 12390 216 Street, RS-1 to R-1 Staff Report dated January 18, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7821-2021, to rezone from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) to permit a future subdivision of approximately two lots, be given first reading and further that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule B of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. 5. ENGINEERING SERVICES 6. CORPORATE SERVICES 7. PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURE 1171 Policy Review: Facility Allocation and Park Gift Program Staff report dated January 18, 2022, recommending policies previously under the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission be updated by adopting Policy 4.25 - Allocation Policy and Policy 4.26 - Park Donation and Gift Policy. 8. ADMINISTRATION 9. COMMUNITY FORUM 10. NOTICE OF CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING Committee of the Whole Agenda January 18, 2022 Page 4 of 6 The meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1) and 90 (2) of the Community Charter as the subject matter being considered relates to the following: Section 90(1)(c) labour relations or employee negotiations; Section 900)(e) the acquisition, disposition or expropriation of land or improvements, if the council considers that disclosure might reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality; Section 90(1)(g) litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality; Section 90(1)(i) the receipt of advice that is subject to solicitor -client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose; Section 90(1)(k) negotiations and related discussions respecting the proposed provision of a municipal service that are at their preliminary stages and that, in the view of the council, could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality if they were held in public; Section 90(2)(b) the consideration of information received and held in confidence relating to negotiations between the municipality and a provincial government and a third party; Any other matter that may be brought before the Council that meets the requirements for a meeting closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1) and 90 (2) of the Community Charter or Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. 11. ADJOURNMENT Committee of the Whole Agenda January 18, 2022 Page 5 of 6 COMMUNITY FORUM The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to speak with Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing bylaws that have not yet reached conclusion. There is a 2 minute time limit per speaker with a second opportunity provided if no one else is waiting to speak, and a total of 15 minutes is provided for the Community Forum. Respectful statements and/or questions must be directed through the Chair and not to individual members of Council. During the COVID-19 health emergency it is important to ensure that our democratic processes continue to function and that the work of the City remains transparent for all citizens. We are doing business a bit differently during this time as we balance the health and safety of citizens and staff with our democratic processes. While City Hall is now open to the public, Council meetings are being held virtually and only necessary staff are present. In -person attendance by the public at Council meetings is not available and we encourage the public to watch the video recording of the meeting via live stream or any time after the meeting via http://media.mapleridge.ca/Mediasite/Showcase. Using Zoom, input from the public during Community Forum is being facilitated via email to clerks mapleridge.ca and/or via the raised hand function through the Zoom meeting. For virtual public participation during Community Forum please join the meeting by clicking on the date of the meeting at https://www.mapleridge,ca/640/Council-Meetings. When the meeting reaches the Community Forum portion, please raise your virtual hand to indicate you would like to speak. If you have a question or comment that you would normally ask as part of Community Forum, you can email clerks(c�mapleridge.ca before 1:00 p.m. on the day %J the meeting and your questions or comments will be shared with Council. If you miss this deadline staff will respond to you in writing as soon as possible. As noted, during the COVID-19 health emergency, we will be using new virtual tools to ensure that citizens' voices are being heard as part of our meetings. We thank citizens for their support as we try innovative approaches to keep us all connected even as we separate to stop the spread of COVID-19. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk's Department at 604463-5221 or clerksOmapleridge.ca Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil(a�mapleridge.ca Committee of the Whole Agenda January 18I 2022 Page 6 of 6 CHECKED BY: DATE: CHECKED BY DATE: CHECKED BY DATE: City of Maple Ridge COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MINUTES January 11, 2022 The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting held on January 11, 2022 at 11:02 a.m. virtually and in Council Chambers of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business. PRESENT Elected Officials Mayor M. Morden Councillor J. Dueck Councillor C. Meadus Councillor G. Robson Councillor A. Yousef ABSENT Councillor K. Duncan Councillor R. Svendsen Appointed Staff S. Hartman, Chief Administrative Officer C. Carter, General Manager Planning & Development Services C. Crabtree, General Manager Corporate Services D. Pollock, General Manager Engineering Services P. Hlavac-Winsor, General Counsel and Executive Director, Legislative Services S. Nichols, Corporate Officer Other Staff as Required C. Goddard, Director of Planning M. McMullen, Manager of Development and Environmental Services F. Smith, Director of Engineering R. Tardif, Planner Note: These Minutes are posted on the City website at mapleridge.ca/AgendaCenter/ Video of the meeting is posted at media.mapleridge.ca/Mediasite/Showcase Note: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Councillor Robson and Councillor Yousef chose to participate electronically. The Acting Mayor chaired the meetingfrom Council Chamber. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ADOPTIONAND RECEIPT OFMINUTES 2.1 Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting of December 7, 2021 It was moved and seconded That the minutes of the December 7, 2021 Committee of the Whole Meeting be amended to replace "Acting Mayor Meadus" with "Acting Mayor Dueck". The minutes as amended were adopted. CARRIED 2.1 Committee of the Whole Minutes January 11, 2022 Page 2 of 5 3. DEL EGA TIONS/STAFF PRESENTA TONS - N i I 4. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 2020-129-RZ, 13287 232 Street, RS-3 to RS-1 Staff report dated January 11, 2022 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7654-2020, 13287 232 Street, to rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to permit a future subdivision of two lots and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B, and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. R. Tardif, Planner 1, provided a summary presentation and staff responded to questions. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated January 11, 2022 titled "First Reading, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7654-2020, 13287 232 Street" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 11, 2022. CARRIED Councillor Robson and Councillor Yousef - OPPOSED 1102 2021-307-RZ, 12208 and 12194 206 Street, RS-3 and RS-1 to RM-1 Staff report dated January 11, 2022 recommending that the Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7789-2021 to rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) and RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) to permit the future construction of approximately 35 residential townhouse units be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D, E, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. M. McMullen, Manager of Development and Environmental Services, provided a summary presentation. Staff and the applicant responded to questions from Council. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated January 11, 2022 titled "First Reading, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7789-2021, 12208 and 12194 206 Street" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January11, 2022. CARRIED Councillor Robson - OPPOSED Committee of the Whole Minutes January 11, 2022 Page 3 of 5 1103 2021-055-RZ, 25443 Bosonworth Avenue, RS-3 to RS-2 Staff report dated January 11, 2022 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7804-2021 to rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to permit a future subdivision into two lots, with the existing residence remaining, be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for a Natural Features Development Permit and a Subdivision application. M. McMullen, Manager of Development and Environmental Services, provided a summary presentation. Staff responded to questions from Council. It was moved and seconded That the staff report dated January 11, 2022 titled "First Reading, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7804-2021, 25443 Bosonworth Avenue" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 11, 2022. CARRIED Councillor Robson and Coucillor Yousef - OPPOSED 1104 2020-411-RZ, 21429 121 Avenue, RS-1 to R-1 Staff report dated January 11, 2022, recommending that Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7689-2020 to rezone from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) to permit a future subdivision of two lots be given second reading and be forwarded to a Public Hearing. M. McMullen, Manager of Development and Environmental Services, provided a summary presentation. Staff and the applicant responded to questions from Council. It was moved and seconded That staff report dated January 11, 2022, titled "Second Reading, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7689-2020, 21429 121 Avenue" be forwarded to the regular council meeting of January 11, 2022. CARRIED 1105 2017-510-DVP, 2017-510-DP, 10386 240 Street and 24028, 24022 & 24060 Staff report dated January 11, 2022, recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-510 DVP and 2017-510-DP to reduce front, interior, exterior side, and rear setbacks, increase building height, reduce parking spaces and to waive the requirement to convert the Committee of the Whole Minutes January 11, 2022 Page 4 of 5 existing overhead utilities on 104 Avenue to underground wiring in accordance with Council Policy 9.05 - Conversion of Existing Overhead Utility Wiring to Underground Wiring. A. Kopystynski, Planner provided a summary presentation and staff answered Council questions. It was moved and seconded That staff report dated January 11, 2022 titled "Development Variance Permit, Development Permit, 10386 240 Street, and 24028, 24022, 24060 104 Avenue" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 25, 2022. CARRIED 1106 2018-243-DVP, 2018-243-DP, 21963 Dewdney Trunk Road (including PID 010-157-468 & 010-157-484) and 12029 220 Street Staff report dated January 11, 2022 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-243 DVP and 2018-243-DP to reduce front, rear, and exterior side yard setbacks. C. Goddard, Director of Planning, provided a summary presentation and staff responded to questions from Council. It was moved and seconded That staff report dated January 11, 2022 titled "Development Variance Permit and Development Permit, 21963 Dewdney Trunk Road (including PID 010-157-468 & 010-157-484) and 12029 220 Street" be forwarded to the Council Meeting of January 25, 2022. CARRIED 5. ENGINEERING SERVICES - Nil 6. CORPORATE SERVICES - Nil 7. PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURE - Nil 8. ADMINISTRATION - Nil 9. COMMUNITY FORUM There were no speakers. Committee of the Whole Minutes January 11, 2022 Page 5 of 5 10. NOTICE OF CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING It was moved and seconded That the meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1) and 90(2) of the Community Charter as the subject matter being considered relates to the following: Section 90(1)(a) personal information about an identifiable individual who holds or is being considered for a position as an officer, employee or agent of the municipality or another position appointed by the municipality; Section 90(1)(c) labour relations or employee negotiations; Section 90(1)(g) litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality; Section 90(1)(i) the receipt of advice that is subject to solicitor -client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose; Section90(1)(k) negotiations and related discussions respecting the proposed provision of a municipal service that are at their preliminary stages and that, in the view of the council, could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality if they were held in public; Any other matter that may be brought before the Council that meets the requirements for a meeting closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1) and 90 (2) of the Community Charter or Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. 11. ADJOURNMENT - 12:09 p.m. Councillor Judy Dueck Presiding Member of the Committee MAPLE RIDGE mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: SUBJECT: First and Second Reading Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019 Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019 12791232 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: January 18, 2022 2019-119-RZ Cow An application has been received to rezone the subject property located at 12791 232 Street, from RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to CS-1 (Service Commercial) to permit the future construction of a two -storey commercial building. This application requires an amendment to the OCP to re -designate the land use from Agricultural to Commercial. Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019 and considered the early consultation requirements for the Official Community Plan (OCP) amendment on July 9, 2019. The subject property was excluded from the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) in 2018, but it is still designated Agricultural and is outside of Maple Ridge's Urban Area Boundary and Metro Vancouver's Urban Containment Boundary. An application is required to Metro Vancouver to include the property within the Metro Vancouver Urban Containment Boundary and to be included in the Fraser Sewerage Area. The property is within the Yennadon Study Area, which has been identified in the Commercial and Industrial Strategy as future potential employment lands. Amendments to the Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) are required as part of the application approval process, to align with regional land use planning and to connect to the sanitary sewer. Metro Vancouver is currently updating the RGS, and has indicated first and second reading of the amending bylaw is anticipated in February 2022, with an approval timeline for the document in late Summer or early Fall. Due to this process, amendments to the RGS by member jurisdictions will be paused until the new RGS is adopted. Through Metro 2050's review and comment process, Council has identified to Metro Vancouver their intention for several forthcoming regional land use amendments. The Yennadon Employment Lands were included in these future amendments, to accommodate a larger industrial land base in the community, including the subject property. Metro Vancouver is generally supportive of this land use by member jurisdictions. Notably, the City of Surrey recently submitted three regional land use amendments including the Campbell Heights Special Study Area, which will provide additional employment lands in the region. To that end, staff will forward the Yennadon Employment Lands land use re -designation to Metro Vancouver following third reading. At this time, staff expect both the subject application and the Yennadon Employment Lands re -designation to be sent to Metro Vancouver at the same time due to the proximity of the lands, the nature of the amendments, and the timing of the applications. Should the joint submission be received by Metro Vancouver during bylaw readings of the RGS, the joint submission will be held until adoption of the RGS. Should the RGS amendments be approved, a subsequent application for inclusion of the area into the Fraser Sewerage Area will be required. This is a commercial development, therefore the Community Amenity Contribution Program does not apply. To proceed further with this application, additional information is required as outlined below. 2019-119-RZ Page 1 of 8 1101 RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government A(A, opportunity for early and on -going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a Development Information Meeting (DIM), and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw, 2) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 3) That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4) That Statutory Right of -Way BK216980 for servicing be discharged from Title; 5) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019 be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 6) That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019, as amended, be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 7) Subject to third reading to Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019, that staff be directed to include the Type 2 Minor Amendments related to 2019-119-RZ in the Yennadon Land Regional Growth Strategy amendment package, that will be forwarded to Metro Vancouver following third reading to Official Community Plan Amending Bylaws No. 7734-2021 and 7735- 2021; 8) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Amendment to the Metro Vancouver Urban Containment Boundary; ii) Inclusion of the subject property into the Fraser Sewerage Area. The proposed development must be connected to the municipal Sanitary Sewer. The septic system serving the previous dwelling must be decommissioned and removed, in accordance with Ministry of Health requirements, immediately upon connecting to the municipal Sanitary Sewer; iii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule iv) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; v) Road dedication on 232 Street and 128 Avenue, with a corner truncation, as required; vi) Construction of an equestrian trail along 128 Avenue, as required; vii) Registration of a Reciprocal Cross Access Easement to provide access to the adjacent property to the west once it redevelops; viii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Tree Protection; 2019-119-RZ Page 2 of 8 ix) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management, and x) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone. Designation: Use. Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Project Description: K. Atwal Lot 44, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 30199 Agricultural Commercial RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) CS-1(Service Commercial) Single Family Residential RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) Estate Suburban Residential Single Family Residential RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) and RS-3 (Single et Dached Rural Residential) Agricultural Single Family Residential R3-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) Agricultural Single Family Residential and Farm R3-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) and RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) Agricultural Vacant Commercial 0.4 ha (1.0 acre) 128 Avenue Urban Standard The subject property, located at 12791 232 Street, is located at the south-west corner of 232 Street and 128 Avenue. The property is flat and vacant, with several trees located along the western and southern property lines (see Appendices A and B). The Douglas Fir tree located in the south-west corner is proposed to be retained. There are single-family homes on large, rural parcels, in all directions, with the exception of a service station located on the north-east corner of the intersection. 2019-119-RZ Page 3 of 8 The applicant is proposing to re -designate the property from Agricultural to Commercial (see Appendix C) and to rezone the property from RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to CS-1 (Service Commercial) (see Appendix D) to allow for a 2,055 m2 (227120 ft2) two -storey commercial development (see Appendices E, F, and G). c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject property is designated Agricultural and is located outside of the Urban Area Boundary. The subject property was excluded from the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) in 2018, as it was less than 2 acres in size and considered too small to support an agricultural operation on its own, and exclusion would not negatively impact the agricultural viability of the adjacent ALR property to the west. For the proposed development, an OCP amendment will be required to re -designate the property to Commercial to allow the proposed CS-1(Service Commercial) zoning. This property is located within the Yennadon Lands study area, a 25.4 ha (63 acre) site identified in the Commercial and Industrial Strategy for future employment land uses. OCP Amending Bylaws No. 7734-2021 and No. 7735-2021 to integrate the Yennadon Lands Concept Plan into the OCP were granted first reading on May 11, 2021. Previously, at the June 18, 2019 Council meeting, Council directed that any new applications, or those already in -stream that have not reached third reading, be deferred until any potential OCP amendments are presented at Public Hearing and given third reading, with the exception of applications that propose future employment land uses. This application proposes future employment land uses; however, the proposed CS-1 (Service Commercial) zone is not anticipated to be a permitted zone under the proposed Industrial - Employment Park land use designation for the Yennadon Lands. The re -designation of the Yennadon Lands to Industrial - Employment Park is intended to support a new M-7 (Employment Park Industrial) zone, which would be similar to the M-3 (Business Park Industrial) zone, but would tailor the uses to be appropriate for the Employment Park. As this application received first reading on July 9, 2019, it is being considered under the originally proposed CS-1 (Service Commercial) zone and is proposed to be designated as Commercial within the Yennadon Lands Concept Plan. Regional Growth Stratecky: In addition to the OCP land use designation and Urban Area Boundary, Metro Vancouver's Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) includes regional land use designations and an Urban Containment Boundary. The subject property has an Agriculture regional land use designation, is located outside of the Metro Vancouver Region's Urban Containment Boundary, and partially inside the Region's Fraser Sewerage Area, which delineates properties that are able to connect to the regional sanitary system. Amendments to the RGS are required as part of the subject application approval process, to both align with regional land use planning and to be included in the Fraser Sewerage Area. The City submitted a request to the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Board for a sanitary connection for the subject property in September 2019 (see Appendix H). Metro Vancouver is currently updating the RGS, and has indicated first and second reading of the amending bylaw is anticipated in February 2022, with an approval timeline for the document in late Summer or early Fall. Due to this process, amendments to the RGS by member jurisdictions will be paused until the new RGS is adopted. Through Metro 2050's review and comment process, Council has identified to Metro Vancouver their intention for several forthcoming regional land use 2019-119-RZ Page 4 of 8 amendments. The Yennadon Employment Lands were included in these future amendments, to accommodate a larger industrial land base in the community, including the subject property. Metro Vancouver is generally supportive of this land use by member jurisdictions. Notably, the City of Surrey recently submitted three regional land use amendments including the Campbell Heights Special Study Area, which will provide additional employment lands in the region. To that end, staff will forward the Yennadon Employment Lands land use re -designation to Metro Vancouver following third reading. At this time, staff expect both the subject application and the Yennadon Employment Lands re -designation to be sent to Metro Vancouver at the same time due to the proximity of the lands, the nature of the amendments, and the timing of the applications. Should the joint submission be received by Metro Vancouver during bylaw readings of the RGS, the joint submission will be held until adoption of the RGS. Should the RGS amendments be approved, a subsequent application for inclusion of the area into the Fraser Sewerage Area will be required. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to CS-1 (Service Commercial) to permit a two -storey commercial development. First reading was granted on July 9, 2019, Zoning Bylaw No. 7558-2019 has been amended to reflect the change from amending the former Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 to amending the current Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application, as discussed below. Off,Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: The Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990 requires that developments provide 1 stall per 25m2 gross floor area for commercial retail use, proposed for the first storey, resulting in a required 37 parking stalls. In addition, the office use proposed for the second storey requires 1 stall per 40m2 gross floor area, resulting in a required 29 parking stalls, for a total required amount of 66 parking stalls. The ultimate site plan including the access easement to the west proposes 61 parking stalls; resulting in a shortage of 5 parking stalls, with nearly 20% of them being for small vehicles. The interim plan requires a turn -around for service vehicles until the neighbouring property to the west redevelops, results in a temporary provision of 58 parking stalls, and a temporary shortage of 8 parking stalls. One space is provided for accessible parking, which is located near the western main entrance to the building. One loading space is also provided along the western side of the building. Bicycle parking spaces are not required outside of the Development Permit Guidelines state that facilities Proposed Variances: Town Centre Area, however, the Commercial A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves the following relaxations (see Appendix E): i. A reduced front yard setback from 9.Om (29.5 ft.) to 6.9m (22.6 ft.) to the building face and to 5.6m (18.4 ft.) to the canopy; ii. A reduced exterior side yard setback from 7.5m (24.6 ft.) to 6.Om (19.7 ft.) to the canopy; 2019-119-RZ Page 5 of S An increase in height from 7.5m (24.6 ft.) to 8.5m (:Z I ft.) for screening of the roof mechanical units; iv. An interim parking shortfall of 8 parking stalls until the property to the west redevelops, and an ultimate shortfall of 5 parking stalls, plus an increase in small car stalls from the allowed 7 stalls to 12 stalls (10% to 19%); and v. To vary the requirement to underground the existing overhead wiring. Staff support the proposed variances as the setback reductions are minor in nature; the allowed height will likely increase with the Yennadon Lands re -designation; and there is a large amount of parking available onsite that the minor temporary and permanent shortfall is supported in order to provide improved circulation and landscaping onsite. The proposed variances are subject to Council approval and will be the subject of a future report to Council. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.5 of the OCP, a Commercial Development Permit application is currently required to address the proposal's compatibility with adjacent development, and to enhance the unique character of the community. It is anticipated that the Yennadon Lands Design Guidelines, which have been endorsed but not yet adopted, will apply to this area once the OCP amending bylaws have been adopted. The proposal generally complies with the draft Yennadon design guidelines. Advisory Design Panel: The Advisory Design Panel (ADP) reviewed the form and character of the proposed development and the landscaping plans at a meeting held on September 15, 2021. The ADP concerns have been addressed and are reflected in the current plans. A summary of the resolutions and now the developer addressed the resolutions has been provided (see Appendix J). A detailed description of how these items were incorporated into the final design will be included in a future Commercial Development Permit report to Council. Development Information Meeting: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was not possible for the developer to host an in -person Development Information Meeting. In lieu of Development Information Meetings, an interim process has been established to allow for a ten day Public Comment Opportunity. The notification requirements are the same as for the Development Information Meeting and include a mail -out, newspaper advertisements, and notice on the development signs that provides the contact information for the developer and the Public Comment period. The Public Comment Opportunity was held between November 9 and November 19, 2021. The developer received two emails from residents with inquiries on the type of commercial being proposed and concerns around parking in the area. The applicant explained that the uses would be driven by the zone. The proposed development does not meet the Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw for number of parking stalls; however, staff are supporting the temporary minor shortfall in parking stalls to accommodate a safer turn -around onsite until the property to the west develops, and the permanent minor shortfall in parking to accommodate the access easement to the west. 2019-119-RZ Page 6 of 8 d) Interdepartmentallmplications. i. Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has identified that all the services required in support of this development do not yet exist. It will be necessary for the owner to enter into a Rezoning Servicing Agreement and provide the securities to do the required work in that Agreement. Comments received from the Engineering Department regarding site servicing are as follows: • The City has not yet received confirmation from Metro Vancouver to permit the required sewer connection. A parallel sanitary sewer main will need to be constructed on 128 Avenue to service the property. A storm connection will be required and upgrades to the existing storm on 232 Street and/or downstream infrastructure will need to be reviewed. • The watermains on 232 Street and 128 Avenue will need to be modelled to confirm available fire flow and determine if this development would trigger any capacity upgrades and/or downstream improvements. • The three-tier stormwater management plan will need to be approved. • Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk is required along 128 Avenue and 232 Street. • Decorative streetlights and street trees will be required along 128 Avenue and 232 Street. • Approximately 3m (9.8 ft.) of road dedication is required along 232 Street, and approximately 2m (6.6 ft.) of road dedication is required along 128 Avenue, plus a corner truncation. • Funds to convert the overhead hydro servicing to underground in the future will be required and included in the Rezoning Servicing Agreement. • A horse trail is required along 128 Avenue. Building Department: The Building Department has reviewed the development application and has provided comments related to Building Code requirements which have been provided to the developer. These comments will be reviewed again at the Building Permit stage. e) School District No. 42 Comments: A referral was sent to School District No. 42 for the Yennadon Lands re -designation, and the following comments were received: "The proposed application would affect the student population for the catchment areas currently served by Yennadon Elementary and Garibaldi Secondary School. Yennadon Elementary has an operating capacity of 628 students. For the 2020-21 school year, the student enrolment at Yennadon Elementary was 657 students (104.6% utilization) including 79 students from out of catchment. Garibaldi Secondary School has an operating capacity of 1050 students. For the 2020-21 school year, the student enrolment at Garibaldi Secondary School was 946 (90% utilization) including 273 students from out of catchment." 2019-119-RZ f) Intergovernmentallssues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the OCP requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 477 of the Local Government Act. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital ,Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. ALTERNATIVE: As an alternative to the staff recommendation, Council could defer giving second reading and forwarding the application on to Public Hearing until the Yennadon Lands process is complete. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that first and second reading be given to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019, that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019, and that application 2019-119-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. "Original signed by Michelle Baski" Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT, MA Planner "Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning &Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H Appendix I Appendix J 2019-119-RZ Subject Map Ortho Map OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019 Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019 Site Plan Building Elevations Landscape Plans September 2019 Sanitary Service Connection Report May 2021 Employment Lands Report ADP Resolutions and Responses QpPENW � 12888 12912 VIN CRES Mcl N c c) cr; cl N N 12885 12892 12854 12865 12834 12831 x SUBJECT PROPERTY N ti cn N 1 � 1 N � cv � do 12784 12791 i 12766 f2761 1 1 12734 1 I / N , N M N 1 12724 12759 �~ 12686 _ 12662 Legend Street Name Labels Stream �--- Ditch Centreline Lake or Reservoir 12791 232 St P I D 003-269-477 Scale: 1:2,500I I FILE:2019-119-RZ DATE: Apr 4, 2019 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT British Columbia mapleridge.ca BY: MC it 4AV y" 40 a ll - At .$ mr, . •r� a LQ _.*'` w /► r ..oil] as MW 'W - r 2 Imp Wft to aw dPI VAN k�4 10 w Raw, . ` 44 = :+ It tot kv Job Ito 'k tr 404 g 4 _ . �i-_ . , ,.ii`4�,t� _ ,y� I. s. i '�►' ,P-jsOW lowIt _ r - Pit `,- •^ J a • r +� t ^ -,ate Ii - •• - t - ` • Aw i; 0 It + f0 • 141 UJ 0 0 ow CSLW l CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7557-2019 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule "B" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019." 2. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 44 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 30199 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1005, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby designated as shown. 3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , 20 READ a second time the day of 12 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER N N 12885 1 12892 12854 i2865 P 75655 P 75541 3 i l 10 ; f j 12834 P 1947 P 19347 E 12831 col i f 00j j P 33395 �( i N` Rem.9 ( 8 ; 7 € 6 5 4 ' ! i 35CLI j li N N 1 N i 12815j 12814 N; N i 041 Ni rn M ........... N M N i 128 AVE. LMP 29188 to o �N N o N N Rem 2 ! o 43 44 I a 0 P301 9 i12784 P51T1 w 12791 �I i .. _ .._ _.... LO P 5181 LO A CLi Rem 1 RP 8148 m [12760 1 12761 —..... _ ....—....�... —... ...�.. `.__ �_..... _. Ml j u~i M_! P 4367 7 j N C{ Rem N 1/2A En j € 12734 P 5467 _ i ��„ P 4367 t u�' i (Li Rem S 1/2A !i mj 12759 12724 6 � � € 12686 P 5467 I � �- Bylaw No. 7557-2019 Map No. 1005 From: Agricultural To: Commercial q SCALE 1:21500 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 755&2019 A Bylaw to amend Schedule -Zoning Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 - 2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 - 2019 as amended, NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 44 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 30199 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1799 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to CS-1(Service Commercial). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 - 2019 as amended and Schedule `A' -Zoning Map attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 9th day of July, 2019. READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER C fw �- N N 12885 i 12892 l i l 12854 i2865 P 75555 j' P 75fi41 l I I 3 1 j 10 I j 1, I 1 P 19i347 i �P 19347 12831 2 1 2 2 834 P 33395 N a; Rem.9 4 8 ' 7 6 5 ; 4 I 35 1 jj cn ! M M 12815 12814 N N ^ r ; O1 ; N N N 1 N i •i �., N N i i ............._..................__.-f_�_.................._.- �. _ ._.._.............__ ..............-. ti-...-_.... i N m i � M N 128 AVE. LMP 29188-- to j N p N N 43 44 � Rem 2 b E a o i 00' P 5181 W P 301 9 E s 12784 j 12791 0 ALO 0.€ Rem 1 RP 8148 m; 112760 12761 ch P 4367 N L` 7 ; N Rem N 1/2A m i 12734 P 5467 P 4367 N Rem S 1/2A UI i mi ; 12724 12759 .............................................................................................................. 6 P 5467 j N 12s8s l N � M Bylaw No. 7558-2019 Map No. 1799 From: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) To: CS-1 (Service Commercial) SCALE 1:2,500 3snwww'alP,Naatl M'xv wl.w2r 9snN�cdu wit M �n wiMN LeuMurY IYeM 79r WIVIN'1tM Plol rne�lw�r'w"I*'•x nl wm �194Juw3nY e'aMAyVI 1E,gxu9 at°JIm ^O "M9a4941ud q uon.woew.n ua,J weua p era w IaWm3w a9 694x 991W 9V1 ' ' N t 3 W+9w Van:ue . I„�,da,m cid avmp" w•Iaa""Ilu 9A*a° awW t9aua .an ry aI qu p du+deW aeryrVna aN a �hnp tua p 4'Vl paeuasay jyYp"do:) / IY iQ 00 of f 5 i 8 5 1133a1S p�Z£Z rc SN01ff13Y dOy 1D0[�ILOZ 9 ....._ uamvmsYar Erfo-trnz s 9NnY re dM11L13W33N3 1RLlhtx02 I ll03 NY319M 1x190t20G E ._.._ 3lrndn ONxYWY 9214tt02 L . sNasss3Y dxry riartmx 2 NOOIMSIO Uv0'ON tl9 asn SNOISIAM W9019 L-SJ ONINOZ-3U zo-z°a°z aim am9 a3lasn y�'�I6IE 9 I9 C .rNt "U14Y""""'M On$100 (non ' Uit TOO (non Y#A I U i,t.""A51 ".." ass 06TV-00e APPENDIX E uAlpp"opqul Auluu.ld uN7glv"". ON T 1N3WdOl3A3A3alvtjaywwUJ'IS p ZZ lk woWa az.nuse3 9�e z� F, 4 msz - zro I1 O to 3 II VIE d CIIIIIIIIS nzaEi t 3 y o. \ �3—'—sF—ua�z e `a IlobIF K 1 ( I \ g IvweL93l;nuu3aoua 6' •`'�I - u AIL- z �FfS u1p� I I I s9 a e; HIS I I v II c w w 1332f1S puZ£Z APPENDIX F hww,... rvnw w rvrv°s..•L..r r.Ys. vPwr,Lr'wr w Nro }Iro a..r+.MlwN w..M NN}Nv WaVW Yw,w.L ir•N tlW }NY Wi WM YM PP.1 iTquuP Nea Y.+M luuup ay. re wl n,, 9u w w.m .Nw»• wn .,. utnffip rv..ge l pamasay 349NAdoj A,Om VL NNlMzoz ! Nlw91YEM1UY Et1PROL S MEIYW �w3111N,w33yE Itrzatnt r S101NnlflM fHPtEEL E ul n NNnm sasotnz z N wE Ltatant t NaIWYXNI Jim vi JSn SN019AIV IV9019 T-S:) 9NINOZ-3a �T I■pwamu Ong les (709) I Ong T85 (409) i L[L NEA i DO 'AaiinS jaaJIS VZST 06TOT-00E u6lsapiopaiul 6uluueld amuallpie SN0IlVA3 WTI .9�W YE3mnztnty ltsvlswzRneR ��•� L-S3 :1tlI:)N3 W WOJ 3 IMAS 9NINOZ-3a M61 Ri 1N3 W d013A3A3O ltll3H3 W W 07 61S PUZEZ ■ G.Iw, '.9 P W, E� G i W Q C ■ ■ ® M ® ■ ❑ ® Vu m ■ ■ 2 0 ® 0®(b®@@® 0 0 0 0 YYtlN13! YltlNl3 U;yr U YJtlNl F�L aunu IEkl:�4�,F�,1 'Aa'lNPdwryAnNP PaPa9Pwl%FNR"me mmry PaLv'aaauN sw 7erot+.'..n*.�wr w.�an Wr7Nv1»Pmw �.m,an lam mvv SNvunwro woo oP•z �froNaPWr'PNwa�z •n wao aa4W aW d e'uea.N1LL u.q. wNaaWN aml u�al awRuu l.ia p psuuq� q geVe oHa 9V1 'maArz W wPrvm uaNua e>,�MARIA un Pa RYa'ao Wd1`aaaiNN) p a aal•nN • p .a anmz w w .^..ma. a.. m M. �P;.P pr. Ma . z pandasa81y811Ado3 suasoaadav aoaz•lzoz d Na®w2mam az�lzoz s 91afaW dlAll unwzm atrzo-lmz o switm1mm f tzaz f 31wW mum fz- vzoz z NCNWM cza zrzzceaz z "cmax sza VN INN JSn SN01SIAIN 1V9019 I-S:) 9NINOZ-3)] al wrsm =a a a a gg 9� uo w s ; Z ]u da iG 7r G o 3 i `a .W.l st s3 =3 9d C8 �9 3 Q EB ax F im 0 0®® 0 0 0 0® 0 0 3nN3AV8ZT fn� aNn utladc inn utlaac (OOa6:N: rave>3sa 3Nn LLtl3a aWMdfaaj lace misl1w+1\PwWNx iWAa.+PMa.n11 ZR zm161\1 mvu of Na Wa errnd f4umilm Na 87TB i85 (f109)1 gas lag (flog) i L[i 8EA 178 'AaddnS 113WIS VZST 06TOT-OOE Z�N}� u6lsapjoidalul 6uluueld am»lyaie SNOIIVA3131S3M19ISV3 v v WTI Nme Ammomllow ja3aava o: u lalzl T-S� :1tlI3N3W WOE DIMS 9NINOZ-3N Z9L61 1N3Wd013A3A30ltlI�N3WW0�'15P ZEZ ■ NPhad RwnN Na/a4 aNn unaac mlvazas ad locos- 3Nn LLtl3� 3Nn LLtl3aOtld 9NnAYa 3fIN3Atl 8ZT APPENDIX G 56� Sp<gggg¢ F�gQ 1z<m° 1 I� ,l a_ .Ral 0 bsi 1111 ;oil cJ 133tl15 P°ZCT. 8 � � VIA IF j m Ey N 8a ca 3a r' MO m I 3 99 0o 75 Nwmc 3 m y E L t �I y C c M sit E m Adftkc c ;e o j � o • ;o � \ i I c ( n ppp - i i Nm = olfl aLL N mW 3 bb6 3fjg 5 aaa i =m0 J E� y ;�I ,i�= v a R J y bb �'j'i �76 � N }/all Ij1 Y CL - t = yaE ??¢a ¢ e£ O` �a o $ v6 a 4 n< V E $ 3 9 = D-oe LLp- U _ mEa E E d�ffia ��$ c as u 9�C E a E c wzn I e n E ¢2 !�E E $c0 E 'RU$ E '3 7a E� tg� o 23e aE Ho`_ 3 oFZO3f of RE z ¢ QEE x xa0 Nn 0.�x mw9 �9G¢ o¢ N$ti zi la's o xc u gN� s z¢�e ¢o �._a o m 3 aE �v m oo<` o £N�¢ _Na E i 7i cpeE d �?�02 oQ m awo a�zo C& gg� :f x� o a= am 1 g 2 z =m o EF eox 8 c' c v�i` �W oos- 2a�" vs` o H �f,�lo�sino .` n a a ®1T® x e® 0 M, r RIDGEN Maple rim dge.ca City of Maple Ridge T0: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO. FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING. September 17, 2019 11-5340-01 COW SUBJECT: 12791 232 Street -Request for Sanitary Service Connection Outside Urban Containment Boundary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The owners of 12791 232 Street are in the preliminary stages of a rezoning permit application to aHow for the development of a two storey commercial building. The lot is currently vacant and is zoned RS-2 with an agricultural OCP designation. The previous house on the property did have a sanitary service connection that was disconnected in 2004 with the demolition of the house. The subject property is located outside the Agricultural Land Reserve and Metro Vancouver's Urban Containment Boundary (UCB). Under current Metro Vancouver. regulations, any extension or amendment of sanitary servicing (including on -site changes in use or capacity) to properties outside of the UCB requires approval of the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District (GVS&DD) Board. Applications require a municipal Council resolution prior to consideration by the Board, as identified in the Metro Vancouver Implementation Guideline #7. The additional connection to the sanitary system does not represent a significant change in the sanitary capacity requirement and does not increase the pressure to provide sanitary services for development properties outside of the UCB, as such the application can be supported under Section 2.3.2 of Implementation Guideline #7. It is recommended that Council support the request to seek approval from Metro Vancouver to provide a sanitary service connection to the property. That the request to provide a sanitary service connection to 12791 232 Street be supported and forwarded to the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Board for consideration. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The property at 12791 232 Street is currently vacant but the owners are in tf�e preliminary stages of a rezoning permit application to allow for the development of a two storey commercial building. The lot is zoned RS-2 with an agricultural OCP designation. The subject property is located outside the Agricultural Land Reserve and Metro Vancouver's Urban Containment Boundary (UCB). The previous house on the property did have a sanitary service connection that was disconnected in 2004 with the demolition of the house. 1110 Doc#2236860 Page 1 of 2 Under the current Metro Vancouver regulations any extension or amendment of sanitary servicing (including on -site changes in use or capacity) to properties outside of the UCB requires approval of the Metro Vancouver GVS&DD Board. Applications require a municipal Council resolution prior to consideration by the Board, as identified in the Metro Vancouver Implementation Guideline #7. It is not anticipated that the redevelopment of this property to a commercial use will represent a significant change in the sanitary capacity requirement and does not increase the pressure to provide sanitary services for development properties outside of the UCB and as such the application can be supported under Section 2.3.2 of Implementation Guideline #7. b) Desired Outcome: That Metro Vancouver approve the property owner's request for a sanitary service connection to the regional collection system. The service connection shall be sized to accommodate a capacity no greater then necessary to service the proposed use. c) Alternatives: Not supporting the request would prevent the applicant from connecting to the regional collection system which would limit or prevent the redevelopment of this property to a commercial use due to the requirement to accommodate an on -site septic system. CONCLUSION: The application to seek Metro Vancouver approval to connect to the regional sewer system is consistent with Section 2.3.2 of Metro Vancouver's Implementation Guideline #7, represents a minimal increase to the sanitary flows and does not result in any decrease in the service levels of the existing sanitary sewer system. As such it is recommended that Council support the request and that the application be forwarded to Metro Vancouver for consideration and approval. Submitted by: Mike Man r of Infrastructure Development Reviewed by: Purvez Irani, PEng., PTOE Acting Municipal Engineer Approved by: David Pollock, PEng. General Manager Engineering Services c Concurrence: Kelly Swift, MBA ��'t Acting Chief Adrr�i istrative er Attachments: (A) Map Doc#2236860 Page 2 of 2 I\ �Il ��� V ��� City of Maple Ridge T0: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: May 4, 2021 and Members of Council FILE N0: 2016-195-CP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C o W SUBJECT: Employment Lands: Re -designation of the Yennadon Lands to Industrial (Employment Park Category) Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021(Policy); and Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021(Land Use Designation) First Reading EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: At the December 8, 2020 Council Workshop meeting, Council endorsed "Concept 2 -Neighbourhood Innovations Village" for an employment future for the Yennadon Lands. At that meeting, Council directed staff to prepare an Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw in alignment with "Concept 2". This report presents Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021(Appendix A) and Bylaw No. 7735-2021(Appendix B), to allow re -designation of the Yennadon Lands for an employmentfuture. Should Council direct, Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No.7734-2021 (Policy) and Bylaw No. 7735-2021 (Land Use Designation) may be forwarded to an upcoming Council Meeting for consideration of first reading. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That in respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvement District Boards, and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies; In that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the referral process, and early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public, Metro Vancouver and the Agricultural Land Commission to comment. 2. That Official Community Plan Policy Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 and Official Community Plan Amending Land Use Designation Bylaw No. 7735-2021 be given first reading. Doc#2747979 Page 1 of 9 1.0 CONTEXT: 1.1 The Yennadon Lands (128th Avenue and 232"d Street) The Yennadon Lands are comprised of 13 properties. They range in size from 0.5 ha (1.5 acres) to 4 ha (10 acres). The total land area is 25.4 hectares (63 acres). The subject properties are located outside of and adjacent to the City's Urban Area Boundary, but are largely within the Region's Urban Containment Boundary (see Appendix C for a map of the area). single-family use to vacant underutilized lands, accordingto BC Assessment data. The properties abut urban single-farnily development on the west and south boundaries; Agricultural Land Reserve to the east and north, and suburban single family lots on the north side of 128th Avenue. A historic commercial node, as well as Yennadon Elementary School, are located within 200400 m of the subject properties. Currently, the subject properties are designated Agricultural in the OCP and are zoned RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). All of the properties, except one property located near the northeast corner of the area, are located outside the Agricultural Land Reserve. The majority of these properties are designated General Urban in the Regional Growth Strategy. 1.2 Suitability of the Yennadon Lands for an Employment Future The Yennadon Lands were identified as a potential location for future employment uses in the City's Commercial & Industrial Strategy, with the Strategy recommending that planning for the additional supply of employment land should begin now in order to best satisfy future demand in an increasingly competitive region. This area aligns with the intent of the current Official Community Plan policies for inclusion as employment lands, as the lands are generally flat, have access to an arterial and collector roadway, and servicing runs adjacent to the properties. It is noted in the Commercial &Industrial Strategy that a mixed employment campus -style business park could be a suitable form of development in this area. The Strategy recommends development with a key focus on restricting heights, while also encouraging building forms and uses that are in keeping with the surrounding residential context. It was originally noted that the Yennadon Lands could eventually serve the needs of the technology sector, light manufacturing companies, and professional offices, all of which offer a high employment density. 1.3 Work To Date At the May 10, 2016 Council meeting, staff were directed to initiate a process to re -designate 13 subject properties, generally located at 128th Avenue and 232�d Street, towards an employment land use designation. The direction was in keeping with the City's Commercial & Industrial Strategy: 2012- 2042, which could facilitate the creation of a unique opportunity for a campus -style business park in the future. On April 16, 2019 staff provided Council with a general update on an Employment Lands Process unAerway in the City of Maple Ridge, which included a focus on the suitability of the Yennadon Lands for future employment purposes. At that meeting, the Yennadon Lands were referred back to staff to meet with the landowners to assess their future interest in the lands. Doc#2747979 Page 2 of 9 A Landowners Workshop was held at Yennadon Elementary School on June 6, 2019 from 6 - 8pm. Twelve letters were sent out to the landowners, representing all 13 properties, inviting them to attend. At the Workshop, 18 people attended, representing 11 of the properties. On June 18, 2019, staff provided a verbal update to Council on the outcomes of the June 6, 2019 Workshop with Yennadon Landowners, namely that there were strong levels of support for an employment future - although some expressed interest only in the OCP amendment and not in redeveloping their properties in the short term. At the June 18, 2019 Council Workshop meeting, Council directed: 1) staff to undertake an employment land use re -designation process and consultation strategy for the Yennadon Lands; and 2) that any new applications, or those already in -stream that have not reached third reading, be deferred until any potential OCP amendments are presented at Public Hearing and given third reading, with the exception of applications that propose future employment land uses. At the March 31, 2020 Council Workshop meeting, staff provided an update on the Yennadon Lands Re -designation process, including the proposed community engagement process that was postponed due to the pandemic. At that meeting, Council directed that the previously endorsed Yennadon Lands process be revised and that staff work with the consultant to prepare some preliminary land use concepts for Council to review prior to proceeding with public consultation. At the July 14, 2020 Council Workshop meeting, staff in collaboration with a consultant, presented three preliminary land use concepts for Council to review. The three preliminary Concepts were informed by the outcomes of the site analysis, on transportation/access, site servicing, environmental features, stormwater management, and parks/trails/recreation requirements for future development within the area. At that meeting, Council directed staff to move forward with a public consultation process, taking into account the public health orders in effect at the time. Through October 2020, staff in collaboration with the consultant conducted a consultation process that consisted of a Landowners Workshop, a Virtual Public Open House, and a Community Survey, The December 8, 2020 Council Workshop report goes through what was heard from the various consultation activities and outlined possible next steps for Council to consider in the pursuit of additional employment land opportunities for Maple Ridge. The re -designation of the Yennadon Lands to an employment future will garner opposition and community comment. At the December 8, 2020 Council workshop meeting, Council endorsed "Concept #2 -Neighbourhood Innovations Village" and directed staff to move forward with an Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw. 1.4 Concept #2 -Neighbourhood Innovations Village Concept #2 illustrates an exclusive employment development concept with an eco-business emphasis that conserves green space and trees, reflective of the identified protected resources. With this concept, the new properties are aligned with existing property subdivisions where possible. This concept illustrates a green buffer from the existing residential homes on the west edge and shows a looped street with smaller business lots and a nature park that connects to the adjoining west community. For Concept #2, all of the developable land is for employment use. Doc42747979 Page 3 of 9 1.5 Yennadon Lands Process in 2021 With increasing interest in the Yennadon Lands Re -designation process, staff have been fielding questions from interested community members, relevant professionals and landowners since the end of 2019. An e-mail distribution list has been established for interested community members to register for regular updates throughout the process. Additionally, regular updates are provided on the project website. Addit[ona[[y, staff have provided regular updates to the Community Development and Enterprise Services (CDES) Committee on the Yennadon Lands Concept Plan and progress in preparing OCP policies and development permit guidelines for the Employment Park. Presentations occurred on January 11, 2021 and on March 22, 2021. 2.0 DISCUSS[ON: 2.1 Yennadon Lands Concepfi Plan Overview The concept endorsed by Council at the end of 2020 provided fora 100% employment future for the developable areas of the Yennadon Lands. Based on Council comments, as well as what was heard from the community during the public consultation process, the following elements have been integrated into the policy work, design guidelines, or the land use schedule map associated with the re -designation of the Yennadon Lands towards an employment future: • Suitable Mix of Employmenfi Uses: The employment area will need to have an appropriate mix and size of employment uses to generate suitable levels of job creation, while still affording a sensitive transition to the surrounding residential uses. • Neighbourhood Business Scale and Characfier: The design of the employment area will be limited to business activities inside the building to eliminate nuisance noise, odour, and other negative impacts. The building form will be more of a residential height and massing in the western area with generous landscape retention and reduced parking if possible. The eastern area may have larger and more conventional light industrial buildings. • Innovative Mixed Uses: The development of this site may include a mix of employment uses (including consideration for work/live units and co-working.space, particularly in the western area). Work/live uses will be limited to the west portion of the site. • Environmental Sensifi[vity: Coho Creek will be protected and enhanced with the appropriate setbacks and a progressive stormwater management system on site. • Trail Network: A comprehensive trail network will connect to the adjoining communities and provide a rich amenity for both the businesses and residents to enjoy, promoting a healthy walking/biking culture. • Resilience and Adaptability: This employment neighbourhood will be designed and planned so that there is diversity and choice of business parcels and units that may adapt and consolidate or expand overtime. • Climate -Change Responsive: The infrastructure and servicing will be designed for increased storm flows and special events, so the neighbourhood has the ability to weather through extreme climatic conditions with additional precautionary measures, including floodways and dry pond areas for emergency stormwater storage. Doc#2747979 Page 4 of 9 The intent is to create a complete neighbourhood, within the existing residential area, where residents and business owners can live, work and play within a five to ten-minute walk or bicycle ride of their residence. This employment area should be uniquely smaller scaled to fit with the surrounding neighbourhood, offering the potential for a variety of smaller scaled buildings with limited building heights and sizes. There may be the possibility for work/live units in the west sector (see Concept Image below; full size in Appendix D). _ _ �.r..Tr.,�Y - --- -�I+��- � - - " --_ - ..._.tl� di r 1' TRW � 1 • II t:L. �:I hb nt . II- Ij� I C I� I —I. 1' �/�' LL__--����F 1 1 1 v C�'��(� �� Irl�l�t7/`�WI� .� S':' �;�1! ,'1a 11 � '1.•J •/ ' � !' _.�- I �•_ 1� emu-' ri/_r__ �1-r., �.. � ..• M� R'� r� 1! 4s`� i f ��II 1 �ryct��{'vr'•nrr � , \ ;�� � i,1 �j +r r - r 1a�r fifr S ~ �`� �1��1�7� .����liM��ltt +C'�r�" � � a .c '" i 1f,�1 '� �l��I :i? r •,i, i, v� •.• ;��� � �Ca .•� k%�•. ` : r • �� r i 1 t. 1 Inl i�-.n�m•,y .f r.:� e � r � r. �•;. fit. ,��+�,ry-_��7��.... i!t_..� ' 4 piy '.��I��f��•'•►����� •;���'`� *� ' •�;.��" 'ifili ll�JJi•/JiJ � d�">.f.:�i'V_ii��_; I '�.,��r �p4��'i;� i.l i �i� l �c., r „�jtl^tl 1�,. { Ntti .r� � ..,i ���� ��� �i� �// � - / The natural environmental area of the site will be conserved, as the Coho Creek Conservation Area, with the required 30 metre setback areas to buildings and trails along its edges. The employment area will be linked by trails and natural open spaces, which in turn will be connected to the adjoining communities. A natural interconnected pathway and trail system is recommended for the site that connects to the surrounding neighbourhoods. The trails should be slightly elevated to avoid flooding and may require elevated boardwalk sections in some of the riparian areas near the stream or in particularly low wet areas. A gravel horse trail runs along the south side of 128�h Avenue adjoining the site. There are no formal trails through the site. There are plans for a comprehensive bike lane and walking path for both 128tn Avenue and 232nd Street in the future that will incorporate bike lanes and asidewalk/trail network. 2.2 Yennadon Lands Land Use Designation & OCP Policies In order to implement the Yennadon Lands Concept Pian, Official Community Pian Amending Bylaw No. 7734�-2021(Appendix A, Schedule 1) introduces a new category to the existing Industrial land use designation into the Official Community Plan. Some of the existing policies of Chapter 6 Employment have been updated, where appropriate, but the majority of Official Community Plan Policy Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 (Policy) is proposed to integrate the Industrial Land Use Employment Park Category policies into Chapter 6 of the Official Community Plan. Doc#2747979 ___ Page 5 of 9 The Industrial (Employment Park Category) is intended to help create a more "complete community" by providing a range of employment opportunities where local residents and future business owners can live, work and play within a five to ten minute walk or bicycle ride of their residence. [n the past, industrial and commercial areas have not always been good neighbours as they have brought consequences such as noise, visual impacts, and undesirable traffic to local areas. Therefore, the design of the employment area will be limited to business activities inside the building to eliminate uisance noi nse, odour, and other negative impacts. Development will be directed in a sensitive and scaled manner so that the Employment Park is compatible with the adjoining residential neighbourhood. The complete set of policies is included in Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 (Policy), which is attached as Schedule 1 to Appendix A. 2.3 Yennadon Lands Employment Park Development Permit Guidelines In conjunction with the Industrial Land Use (Employment Park Category) policies, specific Development Permit Guidelines (Appendix A, Schedule 2) have been developed fortheYennadon Lands Employment Park, which is proposed for integration into Chapter 8, Development Permit Areas, of the Official Community Plan. The intent of these guidelines is to shape the form of development to reflect Council and community comments, while remaining flexible and open to a range of uses. The Development Permit Guidelines go through general design guidelines, such as site planning essentials, as well as specifics pertainingto site planning, landscaping, access and parking, as well as building design and massing. The complete set of Development Permit Guidelines is included in Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021(Policy), which is attached as Schedule 2 to Appendix A. 2.4 Yennadon Lands Employment Park Official Community Plan Land Use Map intended, with Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021(Appendix B), the Official Community Plan `Schedule B' Land Use Map and `Schedule C' Natural Features Map will be amended to reflect the change inland use and designation. The Yennadon Lands Employment Park designation is proposed to change from `Agricultural' to `Industrial' and `Conservation' as identified in Schedule 2 of Appendix B. 2.5 Yennadon Lands Employment Park and the City of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw The implementation of the Yennadon Lands Concept Plan takes place in conjunction with the City's Zoning Bylaw. In this case, the proposed use of the Yennadon Lands will come with a new or modified zone - M-7 Employment Park Industrial. The proposed M-7 Zone generally follows the M-3 Business Park Industrial Zone, currently in effect (i.e. lot coverage of 60%, floor area ratio of approximately 75%, building setbacks, etc), but will tailor the permitted uses to be appropriate for the Employment Park. These proposed amendments to the City's Zoning Bylaw will accompany the Second Reading Report. Should a development application proceed in advance of the OCP amendment process, the zone amendments would come forward at that time. Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 (Appendix A) includes amendments to the zoning matrix, which identifies which zones are permitted under each land use designation in Appendix C of the Official Community Plan. This form of matrix has been updated to reflect the new land use category proposed for this area. Doc#2747979 Page 6 of 9 2.6 Next Steps Based on Council comments at the December 8, 2020 Council Workshop, staff prepared Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 (Policy) (Appendix A) and Bylaw No. 7735-2021 (Land Use Designation) (Appendix B) to re -designate the Yennadon Lands for an employment future. These draft Bylaws are proposed for First Reading at an upcoming Council meeting. Figure 2 - OCP Amending Bylaw Process Committee First Reading Second Public Third Final Reading of the Whole Reading Hearing Reading IntergovernmentalZAqk Referrals ALC & RGS Amendments We are here At this time, development applications that propose employment land uses are able to come before Council. With an endorsed Yennadon Lands Concept Plan, development applications are able to proceed through the development application process, providingthey align with the endorsed concept and Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021(Policy) and Bylaw No. 7735-2021(Land Use Designation). When that occurs, through these site -specific development applications, additional studies typically found through the municipal rezoning process may take place. Such studies may include geotechnical assessments, ground -water impact assessments, servicing and infrastructure studies, agricultural impact assessments, environmental impact assessments (where development may encroach into some Environmentally Sensitive Areas), as well as significant tree and habitat balance assessments. Development applicants will be required to rezone (to the proposed new M-7 Employment Park Industrial zone discussed in Section 2.5 above) and obtain a development permit to regulate the form and character of new buildings. In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, should Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7334-2021(Policy} and Bylaw No. 7735-2021(Land Use Designation} receive first reading, staff will submit referrals to the following agencies regarding the proposed re -designation of the Yennadon Lands: Metro Vancouver, School District No. 42, local First Nations, Ministry of Environment, and the Agricultural Land Commission. For details regarding the ALC and RGS Amendments, please refer to Sections 5.1 and 5.2 below. 3.0 STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT Implementing strategic plans related to local infrastructure and the economy, including the City's commercial and industrial land base, is a Council priority as established under its Growth pillar of the 2019-2022 City of Maple Ridge Strategic Plan. 4.0 POLICY IMPLICATIONS The proposed land use re -designation of the Yennadon Lands to an employment future is supported through the recommendations of the Commercial &Industrial Strategy and the existing industrial policies in the OCP. OCP policies 6.41 and 6-42 speak to identifying additional employment lands within the City and set out compatibility criteria used to determine feasibility of new employment land. Specifically, the subject properties align with the intent of the current OCP policies for inclusion as employment lands, as the lands are generally flat, have access to an arterial and collector roadways, and development servicing is located adjacent to the properties. Doc#2747979 Page 7 of 9 5.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL IMPLICATIONS 5.1 Mefiro Vancouver The Regional Growth Strategy (RGS), titled "Metro Vancouver 20409 Shaping Our Future", manages growth by establishing growth boundaries throughout the region. The Yennadon Lands are largely located within the Region's Urban Containment Boundary, and are largely located outside of the Region's Fraser Sewerage Area, which delineates properties that are able to connect to the regional sanitary system (see Appendix Cforthe Region's Urban Containment Boundary). An application bythe City, to the Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage District Board, is required to achieve regional approval to include the Yennadon Lands within the Fraser Sewerage Area for more intensive employment activities to take place at this site. The intent is to support urban level servicing and an application to the Board will be considered through this process. Staff note that the potential for an adjustment to the City's Urban Area Boundary was contemplated during the previous Regional Growth Strategy review in 2006 and the lands were therefore, designated as General Urban by the Region (i.e. the majority of the Yennadon Lands are within the Region's Urban Containment Boundary), However, two properties in the northeast corner of the Yennadon Lands are outside of the Region's Urban Containment Boundary. These properties will require a land use designation change at the Metro Vancouver level, as well as an adjustment to the Urban Containment Boundary to permit employment uses. As Metro Vancouver is undertaking a review of the Regional Growth Strategy, Metro Vancouver staff have requested that minor amendments to the Regional Plan be held until the regional planning process has been complete. As such, the current development application at 12791232nd Street (at first reading) is not encouraged to proceed with a minor amendment to the Regional Plan in advance of the Yennadon Lands R&designation Process. Council -endorsement of a Yennadon Lands Concept Plan will be used as the spring -board for these future conversations, as Metro Vancouver has indicated support for the City's intent to provide additional employment lands in the region. 5.2 Agricultural Land Commission In 2004, the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) permitted 12 of the 13 Yennadon Land properties to be removed from the Agricultural Land Reserve. This was a voluntary process, so only those property owners that chose to participate went through the exclusion process. As such, one property in the northeast corner (23154 128th Avenue) of the Yennadon Lands area will need to go through the ALC exclusion process to permit employment uses on that site. In accordance with the latest provincial changes in Bill 15, the current owner will have to request the City to make this exclusion application on their behalf. 6.0 INTERDEPARTMENTAL IMPLICATIONS Community Planning staff have been working collaboratively with our Development &Environment colleagues as well as with Engineering, Parks, Recreation &Culture, Building and Economic Development staff, on the pursuit of employment opportunities on the Yennadon Lands. It is anticipated that these departments will continue to be Involved throughout the Yennadon Lands Employment Park Re -designation process. Additionally, staff from the Communications Department Ni ll continue to provide support with community outreach and communication initiatives. Doc#2747979 Page 8 of 9 7.0 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The ongoing pursuit of employment lands, specifically with the Yennadon Lands Employment Park, is included in the Planning Department 2021 Work Program. CONCLUSION: The Yennadon Lands were identified as a potential location for future employment uses in the City's Commercial & Industrial Strategy. This area aligns with the intent of the current Official Community Plan policies for inclusion as employment lands, as the lands are generally flat, have access to an arterial and collector roadway, and servicing runs adjacent to the properties. As such, staff initiated a public consultation process to explore community comment on three preliminary land use concepts. The outcomes of the public consultation process were presented to Council at the December 8, 2020 Council Workshop. At that meeting, Council directed staff to prepare an Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw to re -designate the Yennadon Lands. This report includes Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021(Policy) (AppendixA} and Bylaw No. 7735-2021 (Land Use Designation) (Appendix B), which proposes to re -designate the Yennadon Lands for an Employment Park. Should Council direct, Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 and Bylaw No. 7735-2021 would be forwarded to an upcoming Council Meeting for consideration of first reading. "Original signed by Amanda Grochowich" Prepared by: Amanda Grochowich, MCIP, RPP Planner 2 "Original signed by Chuck Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, Ma MCIP, RPP GM, Planning & Development Services "Original signed by AI Horsman" Concurrence: AI Horsman Chief Administrative Officer AppendixA: Official Community Plan - Schedule A -Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 Schedule 1-- Chapter 6, 6.4.2 Employment Parks Schedule 2 -Chapter 8, Yennadon Lands Employment Park Development Per Area Guidelines Appendix B. Official Community Plan -Schedule B -Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021. Schedule 1 & 2 -- Urban Area Boundary and Land Use Maps Appendix Co Urban Area Boundary and Urban Containment Boundary Map Appendix D: Yennadon Lands Concept Image (Illustration Only) Doc#2747979 Page 9 of 9 APPENDIX A BYLAW N0.7734-2021 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Counci[ may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "A" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Policy Amending Bylaw No.7734-2021." 2. That the Table of Contents is amended by inserting 6.4.2 Employment Park after 6.4.1 Industrial Lands and renumbering the following sections accordingly. 3. That Chapter 6 Emp[oyment, 6.4 Industrial Opportunities, 6.4.1 Industrial Lands, Policy 6.44 is amended by deleting the policy and replacing with the following: 6 - 44 The Industrial land use designation is a key component of achieving a compact community. Within the Industrial designation, there are 3 industrial categories, the components of which are highlighted in this chapter: a} Business Park Industrial -lands that are located in the Maple Meadows Industrial Park and Albion Industrial Area. The Business Parks provide for a range of industrial uses and services, with an emphasis on landscaping and design. b) Employment Park Industrial - lands that are located in the Yennadon Lands Employment Park. Employment Park Industrial provides for a range of employment uses close to where people live while reducing possible negative impacts on existing surrounding neighbourhoods. c) General Industrial - lands that are located throughout the community and provide for a range of services and general industrial uses. 4. That Chapter 6 Employment is amended by inserting 6.4.2 Employment Park, a copy ofi which is attached hereto and forms a part of this bylaw as Schedule 1, following 6.4.1 Industrial Lands and renumbering the remaining sections, policies, and associated policy references accordingly. 5. That Chapter 8 Development Permit Area Guidelines be amended by inserting the following after "Ground -Oriented Residential lnfill" on the Title Page: ♦ Yennadon Lands Employment Park 6. That Chapter 8 Development Permit Area Guidelines, Section 8.2 Application and Intent be amended by inserting the following after 8.2 (9): 10. Yennadon Lands Employment Park pursuant to Section 488 of the Local Government Act to establish guidelines for the form and character of intensive light industrial use and for the protection of natural features and ecologically significant land. 7. That Chapter 8 Deve[opment Permit Area Guidelines is amended by inserting the Yennadon Lands Employment Park Development Permit Area Guidelines, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms a part of this bylaw as Schedule 2, following after Section 8.1.4 Ground Oriented Residential Infill Development Permit Guidelines, 8. That Appendix C Zoning Matrix, Industrial Designations* be amended by inserting the following between "General Industrial Category" and "Business Park Category". Employment Park Category (Subject to policies in Section 6.4.2) M-7 Employment Park Industrial 9. Thafi Appendix C Zoning Matrix, Industrial Designations*, Business Park Category be amended by removing the reference to `Section 6.4.2' and replacing it with `Section 6.4.3' and that the following be added after "M-3 Business Park". M-7 Employment Park Industrial 10. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-201.4 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the READ a second time the PUBLIC HEARING held the READ a third time the ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER day of 202X. day of 202X. 202X. 202X. 202X. CORPORATE OFFICER SCHEDULE 1 • The City's Commercial & Industrial Strategy recommends planning for the additional supply of employment land in order to best satisfy future demand in an increasingly competitive region. • The Yennadon Lands are identified as a potential location for future employment use in the City's Commercial &Industrial Strategy. The impetus in identifying the Yennadon Lands for employment use was largely due to the lands being generally flat and underutilized, with the potential for urban level servicing, and located on arterial and collector roadways. 0 BJ ECTIVE • The aim of an Employment Par{< is to create a more "complete community" by providing a range of employment opportunities where local residents and future business owners can live, work and play within a five to ten minute walk or bicycle ride of their residence. • In the past, industrial and commercial areas have not always been good neighbours as they have brought consequences such as noise, visual impacts, and undesirable traffic to local areas. Therefore, the design of the employment area will be limited to business activities inside the building to eliminate nuisance noise, odour, and other negative impacts. • The Yennadon Lands Employment Park is 25.4 hectares (63 acres) in the north central part of the City of Maple Ridge. It is located on the south edge of 128 Avenue and the west edge of 232 Avenue. As it is bordered by residential land uses on the south and west edges, the Commercial & Industrial Strategy recommends development with a key focus on restricting heights, while also encouraging building forms and uses that are in keeping with the surrounding residential context. POLICIES 6 - 51 Maple Ridge will designate Employment Parl<s in areas where there is an opportunity to increase job densities. The intent for high density Employment Parks is to encourage the right type and size of employment facilities that will help increase job opportunities close to home, as new and mature local businesses to locate closer to where their employees live. 6 — 52 Maple Ridge will direct development in a sensitive and scaled manner so that the Employment Park is compatible with the adjoining residential neighbourhood. 6— 53 An Employment Park will have an appropriate mix and size of employment uses to generate suitable levels of job creation, while still affording a sensitive transifion to the surrounding uses. • � Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 Chapter 6, Page 25 6 — 54 Maple Ridge will designate the Yennadon Lands, generally located south of 128th Ave and west of 232nd Street, for an Employment Park use. The Yennadon Lands serve growing industries, that include the technology sector, light manufacturing companies, and professional offices, all of which offer a high employment density, 6 — 55 Maple Ridge will consider an Employment Park development for the Yennadon Lands noting that: a )The eastern portion of the Yennadon Lands Employment Park may have larger and more conventional light industrial buildings; bj The western porfion of the Yennadon Lands Employment Park will have a building form that is similar to that of a single -detached residential dwelling height and massing with generous landscape retention and reduced parking, where possible, c) Development must align with the Yennadon Lands Employment Park Development Permit Area Guidelines found in Chapter 8 of the City's Official Community Plan. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-Z014 Chapter 6, ACKNOWLLUULIVIENTS The City of Maple Ridge would like to sincerely thank the following contributors who helped shape these design guidelines to help ensure that what is planned and developed for the Yennadon Lands Employment Park is sensitive to the adjoining residential neighbourhoods and the natural environment. Mayor and Council Mayor M. Morden and Councillors Ludy Dueck, Kiersten Duncan, Chelsea Meadus, Gordy Robson, Ryan Svendsen, and Ahmed Yousef, for their leadership Planning and Development Services staff Christine Carter, General Manager Planning &Development Services Charles Goddard, Director of Planning Lisa Zosiak, Manager of Community Planning Amanda Grochowich, Planner and Project Manager Rod Stott, Environmental Planner Mike Pym, Environmental Planner Engineering Services staff David Pollock, General Manager Engineering Services Rachel 011enberger, Manager of Infrastructure Development Mark Halpin, Manager of Transportation Parks and Recreation Services staff Chad Neufeld, Manager of Parks Planning and Development Economic Development staff Wendy Dupley, Director of Economic Development The thirteen property owners of the Yennadon Lands Employment Park lands and and the residents of the Yennadon area, and other Maple Ridge community residents who helped shape these design guidelines These design guidelines were completed by the City of Maple Ridge in association with Michael von Hausen, FCIP, CSLA, LEED AP MVH Urban Planning &Design lnc. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES Design Guidelines Guide Overview............................................................ dam .................................. . Purpose........ . age a off 0 00 $S@fog S a sma 406 ago be 000 %onto 8409 message $04*00 seems How to Use these Guidelines........................................................................ 1.0 Design Administration and Framework Policies 1.1 Intent and Uses. 0 a 0 a a 0 6 a 6 8 9 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a I a 0 0 9 V a a a a a a 0 a 8 a 0 a a a a a a a a a 0 0 0 a a a a a 0 a a a a a a a 0 6 0 a 0 a a a 0 0 a 4 0 a a 0 a a a a 0 1.2 Administration and Interpretation, a v a 0 a N a a a a 0 0 a 0 0 a a a a a a 2 6 a 0 0 0 a a a 0 0 a a a a 0 0 0 4 a 0 0 0 6 a * a a a 9 4 0 a a a a a 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 1.3 Development Permit Area Requirements............... Nuevo gomovesso @@seesaw 1.4 Site Location, Size and Characteristics.......................................................... 1.5 Tree Bylaw, Natural Features, and Waterfront Protection Development Permit Applications, b 0 a a a a a 8 1 a a 4 0 a 0 a 0 & A 0 a a ff 0 a a a I a a a 0 a a a 0 a 6 a a a a a a 0 a a a 0 a a a a a a a 6 4 a a a an a 1.6 Transportation and Access,........... OAS so even @*@goose team was Mae got@@ a sea ON wassoosaw Mae gamuts 1.7 Trails, Open Space, Parks and Recreation. . 0 0 0 a a a a a a m 9 0 9 a 4 9 0 0 0 6 a I a a 9 v a V a a a d 0 0 a 0 4 V a 0 v a 0 0 6 a a a a so 0 1.8 Stormwater Management. .. a sea 4 0 6 a 0 4 a 5 a 9 9 0 a a 4 Do a we 0 so 4 a a am 0 9 9 a I as 0 0 0 6 0 a 0 am a a 0 a a a & 0 a a a 0 4 a a a BE a a& a van 2.0 Employment Area Development Concept and Principles 2.1 Employment Area Development Concept... mama *seemed@ go 9 *avows sea so seem mamma PON got awe odes Amoco 2.2 Guiding Principles.. I a 0 0 a 9 a a 4 a a a a a a 6 0 a 0 4 0 A 0 8 & 6 a a a & 1 0 4 0 0 a a 0 0 & a 9 a 9 0 V 0 a a 9 a I a 9 a a 0 V 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 A R 9 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 9 4 0 a 6 S I S 3.0 Design Guidelines 3.1 General Guidelines: Site Planning Essentials 3.1.1 Minimize site disturbance and enhance natural features. . 9 6 6 9 1 0 9 a 0 a we 1 8 coal 3.1.2 Locate building and parking to minimize impact on natural areas......... 3.1.3 Locate buildings close to the streets with pedestrian access, a a 0 6 9 a 0 9 0 9 a 9 0 a 3.1.4 Locate and orient buildings for passive solar gain ............................. 3,1.5 Locate main employee parking to the side and rear of the site............ 3.1.6 Locate storage and loading to the side and year of the site. . 6 4 a a 0 a a d a a a a a a 3.1.7 Manage stormwater on site.......................................................... 3.1.8 Create a landscaped strip at the front, rear and side of site. . a 0 0 3.2 Specific Guidelines and Standards 3.2.1 Overall site planning.................................................................. 3.2.2 Overall landscape plan............................................................... 3.2.3 Landscape strips and screens ...................................................... 3.2A Tree retention and replacement............ seesaw @commerce 3.2.5 Fencing................................................................................... 3.2.6 Street design standards and pedestrian connections......... 990 smoseme"am*m 3.2.7 Entrance gateways...... 2 4 *@*love a son of mama 00 Ono oveaummae woo *to awn mama 1208 Access and parking................................................................... 3.2.9 Loading, service, storage and refuse ............................................. 3.2.10 Building size and massing. . a a a a a a 0 a a a 9 a a 0 a a 0 a a 0 A 0 a 4 a a a a 0 a a 0 a a a a a a 9 4 d 0 1 0 a V W 9 a 9 0 0 0 a 0 Ad 3.2.11 Building design and articulation.................................................... 3.2.12 Building materials and colour. move sea so ease Goose 0 owes* mama go 0 me mama @SOON a makes move 3.2.13 Crime prevention through environmental design. a I a 4 9 0 9 a a a a a I a a a a a 0 0 a a a a a a a 0 0 3.2.14 Signage and wayfinding.............................................................. 3.2.15 Site Lighting. . a 0 a 0 a 0 a a a a a a a 0 a 6 0 0 a a a a 6 a a a a 0 8 ff 4 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 9 6 a 4 V a a 5 0 8 0 0 0 9 a a a a 0 a 0 a a 0 a 0 8 a 0 a a a a a 3.2.16 Work/live. . a 9 0 0 a a W a 0 a V a a a a a 0 a m a a 4 0 0 a 0 9 6 1 6 a a 0 a a a I a 0 9 a 4 0 a a a a 5 0 0 0 a a 6 0 v a a 9 9 a 6 a a a a a 0 a 2 a a 0 A a 0 0 a 0 a 3.2.17 Plant selection, A? a 0 0 goes come sees a wages* ameamoassas 4.0 Design Review Checklist.............................................................................. 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 14 15 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 25 26 26 27 YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES Design Guidelines Guide �Vervlew These guidelines are specific to the Yennadon Lands Employment Park. They are unique in that they direct development in a neighbourhood sensitive and scaled manner so that the Employment Park is compatible with the adjoining residential neighbourhood. in the past, industrial and commercial areas have not always been good neighbours as they have brought consequences such as noise, visual impacts, and undesirable traffic to local areas. The City of Maple Ridge wants to prevent those negative consequences as much as possible. In the case of the Yennadon Lands Employment Park, the intention is to bring the right type and size of employment facilities into the neighbourhood, so it increases job opportunities close to home and provides opportunities for new and mature businesses to locate closer to where their employees live. This approach will help residents drive less, walk and bike more, and reduce the overall greenhouse gas footprint that longer commutes create. At the same time, as reducing commuting and providing space for businesses to grow, the City wants to provide pathways and trails, as well as other natural areas and tree conservation with any contemplated development in this new Employment Park. The scale, character and size of the buildings will also be carefully reviewed to ensure they fit into the valued west coast character of the neighbourhood. Sensitive site planning, landscape buffers, and screening will help these businesses integrate better with the surrounding established residential communities. Finally, access and traffic will be limited to the arterial roads in the area so that local streets are not impacted by the development to the extent possible. Purpose Property owners, developers, and consultants including architects, landscape architects and engineers will use these guidelines and the associated design review checklist to shape their development permit applications. City of Maple Ridge staff will measure the development permit applications submissions against the guidelines and checklist to suggest potential improvements. In the end, the City of Maple Ridge wants to make the development review and approvals process as clear and self-evident as possible to help reduce unnecessary delays and assure quality design. Most importantly, the City wants to create an outstanding and sought-after Yennadon Lands Employment Park: a local neighbourhood -sensitive employment area that all residents and businesses can be proud of as a progressive alternative to longer commutes. How to Use These Guidelines 1. A Development Permit Application will be completed that conforms to the City of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw requirements and other design standards, regulations, and bylaws including but not limited to the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw, Natural Features Development Permit Application and the Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application. 2. The three sections that follow include. a. Section 2.0 - Employment Park Design Concept and Principles describes the approved overall site development concept and the accompanying principles that guide development; b. Section 3 contains the specific Design Guidelines that apply to individual development parcels; and c. Section 4 is a summary Design Review Checklist to ensure that applicants have covered all the guidelines adequately. 3. Following staff review, amendments will be required to the Development Permit Application as conditions for approval with the intention of improving the quality of site planning and design. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 1.0 Design Administr 1.1 Intent and Use n and Framework Po 1.1.1 These guidelines and associated guideline checklist will be used to guide design and development of the Yennadon Lands Employment Park. They will be used by the City of Maple Ridge to review and evaluate Development Permit Applications. 1.1.2 Applicants will respond to each guideline and checklist item that applies to their specific site in the context of the entire development area (see Appendix A: Design Review Checklist). 1.2 Administration and Interpretation 1.2.1 The use of the term "City" shall mean "The City of Maple Ridge." 1.2.2 Where there is conflict with other bylaws, policies, or Area Plans adopted by the City, those bylaws, policies, or Area Plans will have priority over these guidelines. 1.2.3 Where a descriptive section, illustration, or photograph accompanies a guideline, it is provided for information purposes only to enhance the understanding of the guideline. 1.2.4 Where "shall" is used in the guideline, the guideline is considered mandatory. 1.2.5 Where "should" is used in a guideline, the intent is that the guideline is strongly encouraged, but can be varied where unique or unforeseen circumstances provide for courses of action that would satisfy or generally be seen as equivalent to the intent of the guideline. 1.2.6 Where the guideline requires submission of studies, analysis, or other information, the City of Maple Ridge shall determine the exact requirements and timing of the studies, analysis, or information. 1.2.7 Bylaws, policies, and regulations will be cross-referenced where possible in these guidelines, but it is up to the applicant to ensure that they comply with all applicable bylaws, policies, and regulations in accordance with the City of Maple Ridge's requirements whether or not they are mentioned in these guidelines. 1.3 Development Permit Area Application 1.3.1 In accordance with Section 488 of the Local Governmenf Act RSBC 2015, the City of Maple Ridge is permitted to designate Development Permit Areas to create special requirements for certain forms of development, including the form and character of intensive residential, commercial, industrial or multi -family residential development, and for the protection of natural features and ecologically significant land. 1.3.2 A Development Permit Area is intended to address special development circumstances, and if a property is within a Development Permit Area, certain types of development activity cannot proceed without a Development Permit being issued by Council. 1.3.3 An Industrial Development Permit is required for all new development within the urban area on lands designated industrial on Schedule B of the Official Community Plan other than in those circumstances indicated in in Section 8.4 Development Permit Exemptions. The following form and character guidelines apply to industrial development on this unique neighbourhood site but are not necessarily appropriate for general industrial uses. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 7.4 Site Location, Size and Characteristics 1.4.1 The Yennadon Lands Employment Park is 25.4 hectares (63 acres) in the north central part of the City of Maple Ridge. It is located on the south edge of 128 Avenue and the west edge of 232 Avenue. It is bordered by residential land uses on the south and west edges. Thirteen properties make up the Employment Area. The properties range in size from 0.5 hectares (1.50 acres) up to 4 hectares (10.0 acres). 1.4.2 The west side of the site has newer urban residentia! homes on standard lots. On the southwest edge of the site, set back from Coho Creek, are clusters of townhomes. Along the south side of the site are older urban residential lots adjoining the south edge of Coho Creek. East of the site along 232 Street are large lot homes built on the Agricultural Land Reserve. North of the site on 128 Avenue are older estate lot homes. On the northeast corner of 232 Street and 128 Avenue is a Petro Canada Service Station and associated commercial uses. The Yennadon Elementary School is also located in behind the Service Station northeast of 128 Avenue and 232 Street. 1.4.3 The northern and western edges of the site have current large lot residential uses. One small farm is located in the northeast corner of the site. The balance of the site is vacant, treed, or open fields with Coho Creek and its tributaries running through the south and central part of the site. The open parts of the site have views north to the Golden Ears mountain peaks but much of the potential views are obscured by the existing forested area. The site is relatively flat but is punctuated by mounds and lower wet areas. 1.5 Tree Bylaw, Natural Features, and Watercourse Protection Development Permits 1.5.1 The majority of the site is covered with dense mixed forest of deciduous and coniferous trees. There are a few clusters of what appear to be significant Western Red Cedar and Hemlock tree stands near the west edge of the site. There could also be further specimens, but a detailed tree inventory and management plan would be required to confirm their value and condition. The Tree Protection and Management Bylaw will apply to the tee retention, removal, and replacement requirements on each development site. 1.5.2 Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit application would be required for all development and subdivision to ensure the protection, restoration, and enhancement of this natural environment. Coho Creek and its tributaries run east to west and northeast to southwest through the site in the south and central part of the site. 1.5.3 Coho Creek is fish -bearing and therefore requires a 30-meter setback and a 15-meter setback along the one eastern tributary on the site. The Creek also acts as a wildlife corridor through the site and connects east and west and north to south as part of a larger watershed area. This conservation area is estimated to be 5 hectares (13 acres), reducing the gross development area to approximately 20 hectares (50 acres) or 80% of the gross land area. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES on MIMI N6 4 '• 1 7 1.5.4 1 n accordance with Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for all development and building within 50 meters of the Creek's top of bank. Re -designation to a "Conservation" land use designation within the Official Community Plan is recommended. There is a remnant central "island" of land in the south-central area of the site that may be considered for the east tributary stream compensation and a reduced setback to 22.5 meters for the balance of Coho Creek. A further environmental study is required to confirm the merit and feasibility of the various creek management and, compensation options. 1.6 Access and Transportation 1.6.1 128 Avenue connects to the Golden Ears bridge to the west and 232 Street connects south to Dewdney Trunk Road. Each of these roads will provide limited access to the site and no direct single -site access. Further road -widening dedication and improvements will be required as a condition of development and appropriate road standards for interior roads. 1.7 Trails, Open space, Parks and Recreation 1.7.1 A gravel horse trail runs along the south side of 128 Avenue adjoining the site. There are no formal trails through the site. However, there are some informal trails by some property owners on the west edge. There are plans for a comprehensive bike lane and walking path for both 128 Avenue and 232 Street in the future that will incorporate bike lanes and a sidewalk/trail network. A gravel horse frail is located along the south side of ?28 Avenue YENNADON tANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES Visa; .tom �Lw F ;}� , , In AL 0490; /41 ` y t64 AL ovlip A 1 'Its 1 i i aa ; go t Ak Rex- JV VOW a VIP MAP 1' 2.0 EmDlovme Area Deve nce 2.1 Employment Area Development Concept C�ples 2.1.1 Complete Yennadon Lands Vision: Live, Work, and Play with Nature The intent is to create a complete neighbourhood where residents and business owners can live, work and play within a five to ten-minute walk or bicycle ride of their residence. This employment area should be uniquely smaller scaled to fit with the surrounding neighbourhood, offering the potential for a variety of smaller scaled buildings with limited building heights and sizes. Residential uses will be limited to potential work/live units in the west sector (see Development Concept Plan below). 2.1.2 Nature and Eco-Industrial Network Potential: The natural environmental area of the site will be conserved as the Coho Creek Conservation Area with the required 30 metre setback areas to buildings and trails along its edges. The employment area will be linked by trails and natural open spaces, which in turn will be connected to the adjoining communities. Businesses are also encouraged to form an Eco-industrial Network to minimize waste and optimize the "circular economy" where waste becomes a potential raw material for another local business. (see Eco-Industrial Park Handbook: https://oi)enknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/1 0986/31456 and article; https:Hlink.springer.com/article/10,1007/sIO098-016-1224-x ). a.,, — — .I ��. WWI '.�//t �:v " Mil --'fir ' Jlif�� Lvr Yennadon Lands Employment Park Development Concept YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 2I Guiding Principles 2.2.1 Suitable Mix of Employment Uses: The employment area will need to have an appropriate mix and size of employment uses to generate suitable levels of job creation while still affording a sensitive transition to the surrounding residential uses. 2.2.2 Neighbourhood Business Scale and Character: The design of the employment area will be limited to business activities inside the building to eliminate nuisance noise, odour, and other negative impacts. The building form will be more of a residential height and massing in the western area with generous landscape retention and reduced parking if possible. The eastern area may have larger and more conventional light industrial buildings. 2.2.3 Innovative Mixed Uses: The development of this site may include a mix of employment uses (including consideration for work/live units and co -working s)ace, especially in the western area). Work/live uses will be limited to the west portion of the site. 2.2.4 Environmental Sensitivity: Coho Creek will be protected and enhanced with the appropriate setbacks and a progressive stormwater management system on site. 2.2.5 Trail Network: A comprehensive trail network will connect to the adjoining communities and provide a rich amenity for both the businesses and residents to enjoy, promoting a healthy and walking/biking culture. 2.2.6 Resilience and Adaptability: This employment neighbourhood will be designed and planned so that there is diversity and choice of business parcels Cl"d units so they can adopt and consolidate or expand over time. Climate -Change Responsive: The infrastructure and servicing will be designed for increased storm flows and special events, so the neighbourhood has the ability to weather through extreme climatic conditions with additional precautionary measures, including floodways and dry pond areas for emergency stormwater storage. The intention is that each of the businesses will be part of a greater community that engenders environmental stewardship, economic prosperity, and social responsibility as core to their values. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.ODesicin Guidelines 3.1 General Guidelines: Site Planning Essentials The following are requirements for each Development Permit Application: Qi'"uu(r� 3.1.1 Minimize site disturbance and enhance natural features The site is sensitive to any alterations of the landscape, especially those areas adjoining Coho Creek. There shall be no disturbance within the stream setback area. Other areas with significant trees will be retained where possible and enhanced with native planting. 3.1.2 Locate building and parking to minimize impact on natura[ areas Buildings and required parking shall be located outside the stream setback area. Additional parking or storage areas can be completed with pervious surfaces and surface storage to permit temporary retention, subsurface water recharge and reduce off -site erosion. Any trails or pathways should be located outside the stream setback area. 3.1.3 Locate buildings close to the streets with pedestrian access Since this area is intended to be pedestrian friendly and residential scale on the west portion of the site, buildings will be required to meet the minimum setback requirements unless visitor parking is proposed in the front yard setback. Direct pedestrian pathway access from the street and parking to the building will be required. 3.1.4 Create adequate building weather protection and passive solar gain Rain is a matter of fact in the Vancouver Region. Broad overhangs and other methods to protect the building and pedestrians shall be required as part of a genuine west coast approach to design of the buildings and landscape. 3.1.5 Locate main employee parking to the side and rear of the site Only visitor parking will be permitted in the front yard area. Other parking is required to be located in side yards or rear yards. 3.1.£ Locate storage, service and loading to the side and year of the site Storage, service and loading are required to be located to the sides or rear of the property to minimize potential conflicts with visitors and pedestrians as well as reduce undesirable visual impacts. 3.1.7 Manage stormwater on site Rainwater management will be important so that Coho Creek will receive unpolluted water and nurture the local fish population. No excess runoff will be permitted from any site and will be retained on site in the event of a storm or other rain event in accordance with City of Maple Ridge engineering and environmental standards. 3.1.8 Create a landscaped strip at the front, rear and side of site To buffer the visual intrusion of larger buildings, storage, and parking, a landscape strip will be required along the front yard, side yards and rear yard. The specifications for planting, width, and fencing are included in the Specific Guidelines that follow. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.2 Specific Guidelines and Standards These guidelines generally follow Part 803, M3 Business Park Industrial Zone requirements within the City of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw 7600-2019 and may be more specific in some cases to attain the Yennadon Lands Employment Park Development Concept and Guiding Principles (Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of this document). 3.2.1 Overall Site Planning 3.2.2 3.2.1.1 The minimum development setback from Coho Creek is 30 metres. No buildings, improvements, or site disturbance are permitted in this setback area. The development setback area will be defined by the measurement from the top of bank of Coho Creek and require Natural Features and Watercourse Protection Development Permits, 3.2.1.2 The undeveloped portion of the lot shall have all erosion and sediment control mitigation measures in place and be in compliance with the Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection Bylaw No. 6410-2006, or as amended. 3.2.1.3 Developments are encouraged to incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) techniques into site planning. Applicants should consider employing techniques such as rain gardens, vegetated swales, separation of impervious surfaces, installing below surface infiltration beds and tree box filters, and redirecting water from drainpipes into vegetated areas. 3.2.1.4 All landscaping areas shall meet or exceed the Metro Vancouver Regional District Stormwater Source Control Design Guidelines 2012, or as amended. Overall Landscape Plan 3.26241 A registered British Columbia Landscape Architect shall develop a Landscape Plan for each parcel. 3.2.2.2 The landscape plan is to retain and enhance the natural settings as much as possible with no disturbance to the natural areas to be conserved outside the building sites. Landscape elements should follow an informal design and be understated. 3.2203 Landscaping on site shall provide definition to pedestrian corridors; adequate screening between sites; soften the transition between adjacent uses; and create interesting views and focal points in and to other parts of the overall employment area including the central natural area. 3.24244 Landscape design shall extend and complement the central natural area of the site and complement the adjoining residential development with natural plantings, accent planting, and specimen planting, where appropriate. 3.2.2.5 The scale and location of plant material shall complement and be consistent with the scale and massing of the buildings) and the street trees. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES Landscape for energy efficiency and conservation 3.2.3 3.0 metre landscape strip in the front yard and exterior side lot 3.0 metre landscape screen in the side and rear yards 3.2.2.6 The Landscape Plan shall include vegetation and trees to be retained and protected during construction by distinct fencing (Section 3.2.4). 3.2.2.7 Site grading and excavation should retain topsoil on site and create the least site disturbance where possible. 3.2.2.8 All final site grading must match adjoining, undisturbed natural grades and should be integrated with the stormwater master plan. 3.2.2.9 The Landscape Plan should consider energy efficiency and conservation in the selection and placement of plants including the following: 3.2.2.9.1 Providing shade in the summer and light in the winter to the buildings through deciduous tree planting; 3.2.2.9.2 Allowing daylight to active building frontages; 3.2.2.9.3 Permitting natural drainage and ground -water recharge through the placement of planting and planting beds, and 3.202,944 Redirecting rainwater from rooftop runoff into vegetated areas or rain barrels for later irrigation use. Landscape Strips and Screens 3.2.3.1 A landscape strip is required at the property line along the street front and exterior side lot. Visitor parking is permitted in the front yard only in addition to pedestrian access to the building. 3.2.3.2 A recommended selection of native trees, shrubs and groundcovers are recommended to cover at least 75 percent of the ground in this landscape strip area. The balance is recommended to be natural grasses or no -pesticide lawn grasses. Low shrubs (planted at 1.0 metre minimum on centre and trees at a maximum 7 metres on centre) should be planted to screen parked cars but allow visual access to the building for safety purposes. 3.2.3.3 All planting on the property shall be native, water -conserving, herbaceous and/or woody plant species suitable for the City of Maple Ridge. 3.2.3.4 A metre landscape screen is required in the side and rear yards and along any lot line edge where a trail is required. These buffer/screen strips shall be planted with native evergreen species and are to be continuous and solid adjoining residential uses. These plants shall be planted at a maximum of 5.0 metres on centre and be a minimum 2.0 metres height at planting. Tree retention and replacement 3.2.4.1 A tree survey is required by a certified arborist to determine recommendations for tree retention, removal and management. 3.2.4.2 A tree management plan should be developed as part of the required Landscape Plan to minimize disturbance on the site and reduce associated development costs. If the tree plan is coordinated with storm water management, site grading, road layout, and building layout, site development costs should be reduced. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.2.5 Chain -link fencing integrated with evergreen hedge 3.2.4.3 Groups of trees should be retained to protect against potential isolated tree hazard situations. Associated vegetation at the base of trees should be retained to minimize disturbance of existing soil conditions. 3.2.4.4 Trees on adjacent property must not be cut, pruned or have roots severed or disturbed during construction. Large tree roots encroaching on construction areas shall be left intact up to the foundation. Fill or any other material shall be kept well clear of existing trees. Foreign materials and substances should be prevented from entering or leaching into soils and definitely not be stored or placed in the tree protection areas. At the same time, root systems of retained trees shall be protected from compaction and grade changes. 3.2.4.5 All trees identified for preservation shall be protected during construction unless other demonstrated that they are a safety hazard or require removal to accommodate an approved building or structure in accordance with the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015. Fencing 3.2.5.1 No fencing is permitted in the front yard and external side yard areas, except treatments like low decorative wood rail fencing as part of a coordinated landscape plan to a maximum of 1.2 metres. Fencing is limited the internal side yards and rear yard areas and shall not exceed 3.6 metres. Fencing adjoining residential areas shall either be constructed with I aterials consistent with fenced generally used in the residential neighbourhood or can be chain -fink fencing if complemented by a solid evergreen hedge on the outside of the fence. 3.2.5.4 Any fencing will meet the requirements of Section 403 —Visual Clearances of Intersections of the Zoning Bylaw. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.2.6 Street design standards and pedestrian connections 3.2.6.1 A 20-metre street right-of-way will provide to a pavement width for larger vehicles and their required wider turning radii, as well as street "pocket' parking on both sides of the street. In addition, a 1.5-metre- wide curbside sidewalk will be provided on both sides of the street with a tree planting strip (see Figure 1 below). CL PL PL 20.Om I R.O.W. 10.00 1 110.00 4.20 GL 11.60 GL 4.20 2.55 SL 1.65 5.80 5.80 1.65 SL 2.55 2.40 3.40 3.40 0 2.40 PARKING LANE LANE PARKING i f � c:::2 i a I 1.00 i I HYDRANT 1.95 . 1.50 I 1950 1.95 ONC. CONC S/W S/W 1 .0 %� 2.5 % 2.0 i MAX. 3 1 TYP) 3:1(TYP) 4� MORMONS � 4 0.60 I 10.90 ( 0.60 IF IF r 9� I N 0 10 3.00 M (h E MINIMUM 40(50) mm ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE MINIMUM 40(50) mm ASPHALTIC CONCRETE BASE COURSE ?00>>; f;�w;;,`t "O.' MINIMUM 100 mm of 20mm MINUS CRUSH GRAVEL BASE TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY MINIMUM 300 mm of PIT -RUN SUB -BASE TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY SUB -GRADE TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY Figure 1 •COLLECTOR STREET Cross -Section City of Maple Ridge standard street cross-section permitting space for parking "pockets" on both sides of the street. This street right-of-way provides a curbside sidewalk and an area for street tree planting and lighting. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES Street lighting with special neighbourhood scale Trail with 2.5 metre with and 250 mm shoulder 3.2.6.2 Street lighting could include the following as special neighbourhood scale lighting: 7.6 metre height, gun metal grey or dark blue KIM Large ERA and provide additional 6.0-metre4gh lighting (150-250W MH) along the sidewalk with spacing at 20.0 metres or in accordance with City of Maple Ridge lighting standards. 3.2.6.3 There shall be a separate pedestrian sidewalk connection between the street and the front door of the building or buildings. 3.2.6.4 It is required that a trail network as shown on the concept plan be provided along the Coho Creek setback area and through the development to connect up to the residential areas south and west of the site and with the proposed multi -use trail along 128th Street and 232 Avenue, 3.2.6.5 A 5.Om dedicated public -rights -of -way shah be required along the Coho Creek setback areas and between properties to permit an interconnected trail system and as an amenity to businesses and residents. 3.20606 Standard trail/pathways include a 2. 5 metre pathway with a 250 mm shoulder on both sides (see Figure 2 below). _ 2500mm wide YVkith reCuc�s in E3A 2501 2% cross slope to drain LL mm(min) 10mm gravel screenings 75mm{min) depth - ;f shoulder TYP. 75mm roadbase MW 150mm(min) depth Finished grade adjacent to trail shall be 50mm below trail w/ all 250 adjacent native or existing planting restored to approval by � \� �1 CMR Parks - Each lift of roadbase shall be compacted to refusal with vibratory roller (min.120 type} - Longhudal slope shall be max.12%. Slopes up to max 15% may be accepted with prior City approval. - Provide culverts every 20m or as required. - Culverts and swales to direct water to natural drainages. Trail layout to avoid significant trees and root zones. - Trail layout to be approved by City representative. - Confirm trail width in ESA areas with City representative prior to construction - past edge o! trail Nilex 4545 non -woven geotextile to extend 150mm Drainage swale and O150mm culverts as required along uphill side of sloping site cor ditions isturbed native subgrade w/ und oompactlon of 95°f° SPD or 75mm pitnin to ensure im1 load bearing subgrade compacted to 95% SPD Figure 2 • PARKSIDE TRAIL Standard Defail City of Maple Ridge standard cross-secfion for trails PARKSIDE TRAIL STANDARD DEfAJL YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.2.6.7 Street trees shall be spaced 8.0-10.0 metres apart, planted at a minimum 8-centimetre caliper, and be located a minimum 4.0 metres away from light poles. 3.2.6.8 Parking will be permitted on both sides of the street unless otherwise determined. The 3.0 metre landscape strip on the inside of the sidewalk, and in the front yard of each parcel specified in section 3.1.3.1, is intended to create a pleasant pedestrian pathway on both sides of the street. 3.2.6.9 New paving should match existing --higher quality materials, patterns, colours to emphasize areas of prominence. Paving shall conform to City's standards, however, where decorative elements are required to highlight certain area and slow down vehicular traffic, the following materials shall be used: Sandblasted or broom finished concrete with saw cut or tooled joints and no trowel edges; and concrete unit paver — 305mm Manor Square — Sierra Slate finish, Autumn colour supplied by Westcon / Mutual Material. 3.2.7 Entrance Gateways 3.2.7.1 Entrance gateways shall be located at the entrance to the west section and east section of the Employment Area at 128 Avenue and at the entrance to the east section on 232 Street, 3.2.7.2 The gateways shall set and reflect the character of the employment areas and create a distinct recognition of entrance into Cl" employment area through entrance signage and a potential special paving treatment. Materials used in their natural state are encouraged such as stone and wood. The entrance gateways are to be neighbourhood scale and using natural materials combined with native landscaping. VENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.2.8 Visitor parking only in the front yard setback area Pedestrian access from street to front entrance of building Access and parking 3.2.8.1 Access may be shared with adjoining uses to minimize driveway along the street, but additional access widths are to be provided. Only visitor parking is permitted in the front yard or external side yard areas. All other parking is required to be on the interior side yards or the rear yard areas. 3.2.8.3 Locate disabled parking spaces near the front door of the building, providing ramp or other universal design access. 3.2.8.4 All non -vehicular routes shall be fully accessible. Sidewalks and paved pathways shall be wide enough for wheelchairs or scooters and should I nclude a tactile strip for the visually impaired. 3.2.8.5 Curb cuts and curb let -downs shall be provided in appropriate locations to facilitate safe, convenient, and direct access from parking spaces to buildings for people with disabilities. 3.2.8.E Parking areas shall be divided into smaller sections by planting trees every 6 parking stalls with shrubs and groundcover to break up and green the parking areas. distinct pedestrian pathway connection shall be provided between the parking area and the main building where there are multiple layers of parking. r 1 f YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • s �•71 5 M ..I W.411=201kno IDEM. 3.2.9 Loading, service, storage and refuse Loading and service bays shall be located to the side and rear of the building with access to the side of the building. 3.2.9.2 Loading and service bays shall be screened from adjoining properties in accordance with section 3.1.2.3. Service and loading areas should have differentiated access to minimize visual impacts and potential conflicts with pedestrians and smaller visitor vehicles. Loading and service bays to the 3.2.9.4 No storage materials shall exceed the height of the fencing and side and rear of the building screening. Screening of service and loading areas 3.2.9.5 Ensure construction waste is recycled where feasible. 3.2.9.E A comprehensive waste reduction program is encouraged among landowners that can provide recycling and reuse inclose proximity of industrial and commercial owners and/or tenants. 3.2.9.7 Refuse receptacles shall be located indoors or within service areas out of view from pedestrian access. Garbage and waste material should be stored in containers that are weather-proof and animal resistant. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.2.i0 Building size and massing 3.2.10.1 The front of the building will face the street. 3.2.10.2 It is recommended that the front of the building be articu{ated with wall divisions, building setbacks/protrusions or punched windows to break up long wall surfaces and create interest and scale along the street front. 3.2.10.3 The front reception and offices could be lower than the back of house warehouse and storage areas to create pedestrian scale and interest along the street. 3.2.10.4 Ancillary or accessory buildings, including structures used for storing materials or refuse containers should be visually screened from public streets with dense evergreen planting or should be designed and finished in a manner consistent and harmonious with the principal building. Buildings shall be scaled appropriately and front the street t j�. L'rY1I The overall concept is fo create a green campus of buildings that scale with the neighbourhood. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.2.11 Eclectic west coast architecture with wood, glass, and steel No blank walls; walls with texture, glazing, and colours Each building shall have an area employee amenity Building design and articulation 3.2.11. I Eclectic architecture is encouraged — a range of styles, scale, massing, articulation, and glazing suitable for light industrial buildings with a west coast flair by using wood and steel accents where appropriate. 3.2.11.2 Broad overhangs for weather protection of both building and pedestrians shall be considered. 3.2.11.3 Offices, reception, sales, and other public use areas sha{I be located at the front of the buildings and face the adjoining street. 3.2.11.4 Main entry areas should be highly articulated with at least 50 percent glazing and a distinct front door design and broad overhangs in roof structure and details. 3.2.11.5 Building shall have no blank walls. Where there are major extents of wall surfaces, glazing, texture, graphics, and colours provide visual interest and break up the massive surface. 3.2.11.E Mechanical elements on building roofs shall be screened with appropriate materials that blend in with the building design. 3.2.11.7 Natural lighting and ventilation should be maximized where possible by creating windows oriented to sunlight and operable windows for natural ventilation. 3.2.11.8 Energy efficient fixtures, programmable thermostats and lighting are recommended to reduce energy demand and minimize operating costs. 3.2.11.9 Each site shall have an employee amenity are for the common use of employees and visitors that could include a simple sitting area with shelter. 3.2.11.10 Main building entries should be clearly identifiable from the street or entry driveway. 3.2.11.11 Renewable energy features should be considered such as solar and geothermal energy where feasible. 3.2.11.12 Locate building ventilation systems to minimize noise and exhaust on pedestrian areas, adjacent residential development, and outdoor spaces. 3.2.11.13 Bicycle racks and bicycle storage for employees is required to advance bicycling to work. Bicycle parking should be visible, in well -lit areas and the bicycle racks should be of theft -resistant materials, securely anchored to the ground. In addition, showers and lockers are encouraged. 3.2.11.14 Main building entries should provide generous weather protection that is designed to be an integral feature of the building's architectural character. 3.2.11.15 Larger sites that are developed with more than one building should provide a weather protected walkway system to connect building entries within the site, and coordinated with adjacent sites if possible. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES •��ns 3.2.11.16 Canopy and/or awning systems detailing should consider integrated signage, lighting, and display systems. 3.2.11.17 Canopy and awning systems depth should be maximized to provide greater weather protection, as well as reduce the scale impact of larger buildings. 3.2.11.18 Weather protection elements on overhangs may be considered in required yards and landscaped setbacks. 3.2.11.19 Ground -oriented pedestrian "streets" through large footprint buildings are encouraged to create connections to on -site circulation routes and amenities, consistent with acampus-like high-tech environment. Such circulation through buildings should be clearly identified and designed for use by the public. �� �� �s glony acwdv � �3 � !/f' THE PDX --1'v�/ � �^�wvla'hon � i► f -r ,� � � ��/ t YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.2.12 Building materials and colour 3.2.12.1 Wood, stone, steel, and glass should be elemental to the buildings and Wood, stone, steel, and glass should be elemental to design building clusters to emphasize the west coast locale and contemporary design. 3.2.12.2 Materials like vinyl, aluminum siding and brick facing are not preferred or should be only a portion of the building materials. Accents in wood and stone are recommended. 3.2.12.3 Exposed concrete shall be sandblasted or clad in split faced granite or similar material. Coloured concrete, if used, should be muted earth/rock tones. 3.2.12.4 Construction materials should consider recycled content where possible. 3.2.12.5 Clear or muted colours, used with stains, or earth tone -coloured materials are recommended; accent colours shall be permitted on special building elements such as trim and around the entrance ways. The building materials should help reduce the volume and scale of the buildings to help them fif better info the Yennadon neighbourhood. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES r%* . L Tn " 441' - v4bn 3.2.13 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design 3.2.13.1 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (OPTED) princlples shall be incorporated into site planning and building design by ensuring convenient, safe and identifiable access routes to building entrances, and other principal areas of the site and buildings. 3.2.13.2 Design the site and building so that there is natural surveillance, allowing people to easily view what is happening around them from the parking lots, entrance areas, storage areas and loading bays. Entries and walkways should be highly visible and well -lit with minimum hidden or blind corners. 3.2.14 Signage and wayfinding Signage sF►ould complement building design and placement 3.2.14.1 All signage shall conform to the City of Maple Ridge Sign Bylaw. 3.2.14.2 Signage design, materials and message should be integrated and complement the scale, colours and materials of the building. 3.2.14.3 In multi -tenant buildings, signs shall be designed to present a unified appearance using a single sign at the entrance and separate signs in a consistent sign strip along the mid -part of the building/buildings. 3.2,14.4 Entrance signs to the site should be ground -mounted and simple in character to display the street number and name of the complex. 3.2.14.5 Entrance signage shall be monument based and shall be combined with landscape design to integrate the sign into the site planning and design. 3.2.14.E Only one individual tenant sign is permitted in a coordinated sign strip area. Sma!!er monumental entrance signage using building materials and west coast look complements a local neighbourhood landscape. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.2.15 Site Lighting 3.2.15.1 Lighting shall be designed following a 'dark sky policy' with direct lighting only (fulkcut-off) so lighting is directed and there is minimum off -site impacts especially on adjacent residential neighbourhoods. 3.2.15.2 Even within the development discreet front entrance lighting and other visitor parking lighting is lower pedestrian scale (LED energy efficient lighting and directed and complements the adjoining street lighting. 3.2.15.3 Security lighting is directed and does not flood -off site. 3.2.15.4 Other accent lighting including up -lighting for the entrance siynage, pedestrian pathway lighting, and specimen trees is acceptable and encouraged as part of a unified landscape and building lighting plan. 3.2.15.5 Sidewalk lighting will be coordinated with the street design. 3.2.16 Work/Live 3.2.16.1 Work/live units may be approved in the west area of the site. 3.2,16.2 These work/live units will be required to meet the parking standards of the City of Maple Ridge for both residential and industrial uses. 3.2,16.3 Parking for the residential units will be conveniently located adjoining the unit. 3.2.16.4 Workspace will be provided on the first floor and residential space will be provided above the unit and front doors can face an internal access lane. 3.261645 No residential units will be permitted on the first floor. 3.241646 Caretaker units can be provided in other industrial buildings. 3.2,1647 The Work/Live units shall comply with the other Employment Park guidelines, unless otherwise specified, to ensure that they integrate with the development patterns within the Park. Work/Live space development opportunities in fhe west sector of the Employmenf Park will provide suitable opportunities for incubator small businesses and a suitable transitional use to fhe existing adjoining residential uses. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.2.17 Landscape Requirements 3.201701 All landscape methods and materials should meet current BCSLA/BCNTA Landscape Standards. 3.2.17.2 Native British Columbia species should be maximized. Any supplemental planting should be compatible in variety and size. 3.2.17.3 Minimize cultivated, decorative, and non -indigenous plants and lawns. Naturalized landscapes should be the general approach to reduce maintenance, enhance wildlife, and water use. 3.2.17.4 Tall tree species should be located to minimize impact on views from neighbouring properties. 3.2.17.5 All trees shall be provided with a sufficient depth of soil volume to meet or exceed a total of 10m3 of soil volume per new tree planted. 3.2.17.E Potential native landscape plant list: The following are potential native plants options for individual, cluster site, and overall site development enhancement. This is a general list of plants. Sometimes the best solution with native planting is to mimic the tree types and patterns on the existing site to maximize compatibility and survival. All plant material will meet BCNTA standards. Deciduous Trees Red Alder, alnus rubra Vine Maple, acer circinatum Red Maple, acer rubrum Paper Birch, betula papyrifera Pacific Dogwood, cornus nutallii (and smaller varieties) Douglas Maple, acer glabrum Black Hawthorn, crategus douglasii Pacific Crab Apple, malus fusca Bitter Cherry, prunus emarginata Coniferous Trees Douglas Fir, pseudotsuga menziesii Western Red Cedar, thuja plicata Western Hemlock, tsuga heterophylla Western Yew, taxus brevifolia Red Cedar, thuja plicata `Excelsa' Western White Pine, pinus monticola Shore Pine, prunus contorta Mugho Pine, pinus mugo mughus Shrubs Maidenhair Fern, adiantum pedatum Deer Fern, blechnum spicant Western Sword Fern, polystichum munitum Oregon Grape, mahonia aquifolium Huckleberry, vaccinium parviflorium & ovatum YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES Redtwig Dogwood, cornus stolonifera Wlid Mock Orange, philadelphus lewissii Viburnum, viburnum davidii Pacific Rhododendrons, rhododendron macrophyllum Azaleas, (local evergreen varieties) Sarcococca, sarcococca ruscufolia �r®und C®very, Vine Kinnickinnick, arctostaphlos uva-ursi Salal, gualtheria shallon Clamatis, clematis armandii Diversify of nafive planf materials that grow well in local site conditions is i�rrportanf to the health and growth of fhe site landscaping . YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUlDEL1NES Yennadon Lands Employment Park Desian Checklist Design Section 3.1 Site Planning Essentials 3.1.1 Minimize site disturbance and enhance natural features 3.1.2 Locate building and parking to minimize impact on natural area 3.1.3 Locate buildings close to the streets with pedestrian access 3.1.4 Locate and orient buildings for passive solar gain 3.1.5 Locate main employee parking to the side and rear of the site 3.1.6 Locate storage and loading to the side and year of the site 3.1.7 Manage stormwater on site 3.1.8 Create a landscaped strip at the front, rear and side of site 3.2 Specific Guidelines and Standards 3.2.1 Overal{ site planning 3.2.2 Overal{ landscape plan 3.2.3 Landscape strips and screens Compliance Comments or Equivalencies YES/NO YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDEIlNES Design Section Compliance YES/NO Comments or Equivalencies 3.2.4 Tree retention and replacement 3.2.5 Fencing 3.2.6 Street design standards and pedestrian connections 3.2.7 Entrance gateways 3.2.8 Access and parking 3.2.9 Access and parking 3.2.10 Building size and massing 3.2.11 Building size and massing 3.2.12 Building materials and colour 3.2.13 Crime prevention through environmental design 3.2.14 Signage and wayfinding 3.2.15 Site Lighting 3.2.16 Work/live 3.2.17 Plant selection YENNADOIV LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK. DESIGN GUIDELINE SUMMARY EVALUATION: Yennadon Lands Employment Park Strengths Weaknesses Required Improvements Other Recommendations and Comments YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINE Notes on Development Permit Appllcation YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES J ! ! , 101 M) CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NU. 7735-2021. A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "B" and Schedule "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1, This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No.7735-2021." 2. To amend the Urban Area Boundary, as shown in Schedule 1, to include the Yennadon Lands in their entirety. 3. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 43, Plan NWP30199, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District Parcel A, Lot 8, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township Lot 7, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District Lot 6, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District Lot 5, Plan NWP5467 ;Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District Lot 3, Plan NWP5430, Sublot 1, Part NE1/4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District, Except Plan PARCEL "A" RP22408, P23424 Lot 4, Plan NWP5430, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District, Except Plan 23424, LMP12700 Lot 2, Plan NWP22339, Part NE1/4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District Lot 46, Plan NWP31436, Part NE1/4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District Lot 55, Plan NWP40879, Part NE1/4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District Lot 56, Plan NWP40879, Part NE1/4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District Parcel B, Lot 8, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster Land District, (REF PL 13094) Lot 43, Plan NWP30199, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District And outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1038 and 1039, a copy of which is attached hereto as Schedule 2 and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby re. designated to Industrial (Employment Park Category) and Conservation. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of 202X. READ a second time the day of 202X. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 202X. READ a third time the day of , 202X. ADOPTED, the PRESIDING MEMBER day of 202X. CORPORATE OFFICER ilD line 40, lD k e v �n J fins 9rn nz 2 rs,n 4' a1Qi 2• 1rs9 rt a I6 Pn 2_'-1 11 r_ To rt:a i6 t5 ZT 1� JT9'• L.G w>r, fins 5 rt !. A f= a P"T3 N . 31 u2 p J�rrn 6 1 urn SCHEDULE 1 s14 a,s �- 1.. L T Ra�" ] ( 2 .. G PTT424 PTMW PS+Tf t6,'2 a2 2 c Fpvl�z \\nl• aJ' v,n4 CLZJ rw FeW46 S13 r1:A is MID 6 CS/r� °�6_r'S3 I'35 ' PInJ:Ji25lm Wee �aPm oun ary C�, 2 � Dt4,J) -itif �-4 ProposeP�Q P.62 k _ P' Urban,Ar`ea 25 `� l _17 a Boundary 2l I u u J r.1 ,u Z r R is 'a3 E P1= =3 PT' J W 26 S� 9 19 " L1.P�` 3 0. P L' !1 13" stiff 1 f a 13 tr �11 i 2 es t , 2 1 2 2 Pr. as P+' sa :4'st ♦ R PJD� P T4t-,) 1 2 J: Za r 21 E 1 u Fvn 9 6 1 6 5 ] ] ] Dtll all - life i z am E. it■w pINIInI���=-I1g1.1 �•�.i?9 rni�! ywto iiP r� ® �r n ry � y T w5 JF. u uJ 41T T w nv y LIP 1r J J ti tso r.wl _ T 2 1� - 4J H � Fc^.2 D i>-}sl 3 ` IC u �p FP I]Q31 mrrl n C P5161 FP 4 Ds w 1'=5 3On' art ti F 79 P.Y 79 FPet:a �— P+mt tztU i•v u 4_..a P314M „ y UO 3T1O I 3 = Z t o :1 T Pivn!IIA1A Wl,2c pto P X1 1 _ n 2 2 r P46I t ] z ] _ ■ Q za iT :i, i P223'{J Fxtl6 ,nw llJu. , arkle Inns it _2 ]] ]J 5 . 412 lvkft" Ares 9�. flllnrl7rl/ 6 r rf" � 6 I.,,t a M \.%I rJQI l nl CQ r./Vid11WQl r � °rpr u K 22I fifty j To Be Removed ,] O e T A D IV i:W .h = F .ati a / t•.. • lot owl a" 4/ E s via] {1 t / PS 7 t}of • I ' r PvC9 / \ y:] P :21 P tat ]fh \ PVAW Not p L i. n 7ip ROl ^ �n ii, x"� _ -41I o rym era,J,x.n Cw ]manal t 2 f ]m] P I' R E3] Dura ,� I � zm2� L� R `�•}v .r.1 seen 2 P6+69J / sJ ® 1 ^ 14 Pi_ T5 Piv r901 1 _ / y] 6,i Z'3 :5 Z1 2d D JC 31 R p JJ 15 ]6 ]} }3 3 Jfi 41 4I 'f1, z to r n3,a 3 -, T'� //�� lei P t - a ? A e a - - - to 2 - If 137 n "t000t a to to �.e .mot ''T / {i ;f 1 C 2 ollwl�qq e T tUS `to t_ �_ ISttn I 9�F PFJ'b2t , Cr a 8" ` \ / —��' `� I81 Z] �6L 2� f� ss �D Zl 2f iC t3 16 ~Ir 16 „ y , �,] �f2 „ .a ° 6 .Ire 5 - o Urban Area r s s t P� 51 P`4 r6 P,1 T6 1 4 .. lt F F P JI +I U 4J 43 Jb iI 48 JS :�rT ; y,50 ] J q f2 11 t O a ] 6 5 4 ] 2 1 , �• JI 9'-1C. Ti l 3 C= -h _ r « C 1 Ly 2 ] P22J53 L F 6 1 6 7 5C 4= ]= 2C _ Tt ]• yJ1. ry I' 2 CC .. 6 y •;S "WW � - - P1627 71 �l ]2 ]3 3t 35 I ma - C - Fmr2 r.t ]C 1 :b ',y Palitas19 C2p a 3 T PTT 13 v u i T3 v:! PeJ N tl G Z E 6 P gib PC;41] PQ 1 21 22 2] 241 21 ] 4 '5 rs ?�,il II , >.i5 F 6 n- airs t �:Ots 2 ] �4 5 6 L ° e 7 e i.'f « a TT rm is in AP 1f1 ,Ot � P:'r,aJ 0}v22 19 « R• w J rt�v txr, �J ]ry72 r• >'12E nc '0 CAACalt! nl; JIY pt .2 �] IFIP ISem Fe14 ll R ^„n . yWe 1}.a nC ' :9 L'.P4 21 ., r: 16� C.uC 12 I1r iAA1]2:+ t♦FIZtI J1� ;I q r�>o 20,I _ Irnv9 n le is y a e 9 P. ti 16 �17 le �t3 e37 Pe.n I �• A e° lei r'. 15 ,. ,] 12 •It IJ 5 4 2 19 'T 1e ,3 :a 2t J� „ s Y r '="�, /4 is a a 8 T 4 rs„IorX F.a 6 dli r.4 JS,P r P, r.o>6 C ?, 10 '..,, .:..� Y..4ai• '� P i e 9 23 r,n, ut r. tb}s.1 r-V L] 3'12 s of '5 a6 a aJ 6- tot BI Its ?t .1 1e PT` 4T } .6 C 1 , u 16tY 2 T}�- tt.^A ^]� jJ 25 �6 �x 26 t9 Ikt R1'g13 1J i. �'S VAJ JT]d t1 ? /\2 +-r lit ,5_ ,3, ZqC 2!- 222 2]] CIJ 215 .' + '-";] ] ,J I5 t4 T 6 y4 iT ] PC AI]1 PJD: 1 ~ffi r - �. PS;Cffi J,a>1 lei tt ]�vr.T II I6 l 1I] ,m 3 lei Ise td) 131 1a5 `� 1 )Tale u, F v'4 1 IP +aa , ' ,: •♦J2 ..�, •'c fi:•D. r , L y@ u a1J L1 =2 LJ "4 ?5 9e iT lee So ;,U i 2 F] _� 13- Bylaw No. 7735-2021 Map No. 1037 Purpose: To Amend the Urban Area Boundary as shown — � Remove Existing Boundary •' �! Add Proposed Boundary N SCALE 1:6,500 2 n 1l to e It. ( P2_bro t / / e ]\ / q ]1 PSJT, LLPIZ PZ16S2 r2 P 141 J] xr P lS72 1 1 i to F GJ6i3 ?Zr-t � 11t L' �•$ x �z 7 L ;1 vi r.11 F it i zil� a f:y Polar ,:u: ma t] s 1a n Irva t y G a 2 P2: w P St twit , I, t2 ' 6 P tiftS 2 13 M Ix 21 [r C f: I[ I� 3 ,J IC all 1 MMM�8 AVE n 12 0 ,1 10 D 5 r.1u taco 13 ] nm Z n it t}P Y® /t ro 22 T3 u`r a am :D IT C 77712 u" 15 IF ,37N tern 1 5r 2 rl >>ozl Pl �m ' Wit O Ufg fa 2 :5 tWS,: 6 � J VIP (`aYF] 5t F i r v� tar v II C t A# al Uv tl J2 31 'b m� �l LiP _in >� y I: Bylaw No. Map Nat. From: tr`n ..A r 17• J JM 41 2 e tl C _ J 2a n mv6 1 J0. _\P , 2 ] 8, Ki ]' S 6 v7 6 P 10 �7, 1: it It t fe VLS SieS %J : a l 1. 11 POfEQL 4F / 7735-2021 1038 Agricultural Industrial MEMO SCHEDULE 2 Moot 9. is 9 Ifi P"424 PJ59 it s 12 `iLlS\\� sZ 2 c ! a sn \\ems• n� � t x ] w14 E1ni ou]1rG Eile Ei.7'l 'L _ P=7 PpT s.] _ s,o F�9 Si < 6 rt�a� �e e 1 b = F ; : a oun ary - F `a�l`62 e zs 2 r c PT -h t 2 i ,Jl Pt' s; vT= t1 R � - F t6i4, Nut •c m f 3 d 1 6 6 'im 1 P 5191 w-n , PaxT saw-rr,nA ? tY5) >k S1RA FP W L1 c t le \ a P1nnm to �a 3 2, L fO f9 17 t5 15 1 1 �I] _ It t] 9 •0 "7 '6 l5 Pt. rd (1 o,I Car PI )6 e' 4 WAIP 6 ] P 6 1 '32 2 J J !] I: t, 1 2 6 7 6 5 A Z 1 1 F ! e oo = _ Z Etalf • ra441 P2]J52 6 nrr. .e,..e P IMT c t -UP71J 10 Id t9 2A P 9• Pe:31] P�d1J •16 E� It =a t Jim I1w 'nV6( 2IJ rU. ii33 u, 2I ]] f.CTIFR'A' P515D 1' _a :Ir y , I_ 21 r: E UP47 V.P t373 " 1442..0 �lrONE 111111111111111�g :.t' 2 is �n ,r`.,D1] ,1211D ID i `? 31 In n,l '4y n�'',23: n� 7��6 Yie •+J' � 2 s G71 38S 164j tT L'a :]6 V.P 3b J �� •• +6 � \pl F • ]T; _t L of P'` 17 151n ,6r t32 1nt 112 Z>- Z}. _:J ?15 f' t ,:r,i S 6 a z 7 �.7 �2 l5 •"' C Z t5y 5 114 I ya kz ry e 3 ..] ,I Q_�Z� by a C 2 _ _ T. 2 S^,� '+•] , L' vIJIN'Il Cm _ •J2 X S D A tl ']"^ 1r" .i•� A 6a .. (. �..� 1 e "16 r. _12 ,5 SIP \' � Conservation —' '—" Urban Area Boundary N SCALE 1:6,500 2 P3r3n 73 I I v 1 / PzmJ\ .+ Ji FSTTI I P zisa uP nrA / u P:J113 xr P imix } R Iv ' Pb'42 PI711 Y Wi l a] W r/l It r >4 J '- 2 Rom•• t:n rim u t , f:n 12 1 to s4 v15io x a a a m r G p :i H a" MMEIRRAVE. 11 n 1s G B IPA RRRRRRRRR 3 uo irf rr,H M2 ec z D l�n 1 m LSP JSQ gi lw •I � y A ai uni 41 u rlt Iml 38 2J 6 T113 .iffy 1.1:!:0 Otto Firs uP +sm u.P 1- ] _ 2 J[bz ^2 d mt3 n c N 1 Woo rv4 3 O u A77s z a pest r� r x IFS s , �xT 4 lAf d1'Ari :C' all TIT I9 '9 �8 .P i I3 Bd' T 6 L•. 'xr IWO gc nrn 1 it t8 10� rly .3� 1 3 Ir ,} Y ata]z 1n 3 T it y 1� 13A lJa 14SI 16 STS En[ N TJ 99 ItIM P i(u�1 (�P 711 31F6 6 A PT114 :I •d di WJI 1 14 SDP 1 C f1 `J'1 3x�VittM PTlLT! q :7 VW afn ''� 03 ss t aTv P nT a J m 211 YII PXYS n 3� arJ _= z 5j f! Volt 3T I ��0000—=� iir • PN+'irixr Qa C y E t. my vet `rnrx pl , 3 41 n _ 4 a. c m IJ" a I] I L :11 =' � n RIP T v n; fz,r a:un coil ll m , ZIP �73 LSP scud i t 3 i1n1 ihP .d 4 Ail " x to r 3 l n e 6 i A C 4F �3 G 1!d 1>9 C ITfl : t3t R 1a7 G itv3 131 !!E i r IN PRO Bylaw No. Map No. Purpose. From. To. _ 3 � 3' �i 33 Jc 7 ie v' �ro .n x -iv �u 3 �tfi uts z�s n E c ..,. .. .u..1J 14 _1 _7 _a 2 U 81T P Tlrl FT33',+p a 11 a•9 \\ a1 C 21t As P6JOJd Zt^ a� Zyi ra aJ 31J 8 � r>•t� rJ' ■M■ `1� � PTT i11 PiSIJts R oun ary A 1 l NT In Et2J kY Ja"61 F 6131 P©? P'G39 E P 11ti] n 3g 4 9 - sr P'iYQ G 1 r PS '13 E Pl= 5: PT` <: PTY.31 ] L d mW PISit 93 f z y i z t z rim n R P m'6 t ; F.nu s l s a }. C z F; :f C � 126AV`� € a z V JS Fsr1 Ps;a1 v J]LT P,T.0 txw i i FP: 13 13 11 M 19 to 'il •tc 13 1 ~13 -11 'It 'tJ ^L ~3 ^) ?6 •5 P '2 3 P d' 4 U 11 11 } t 9 d l L 3W�V�vv i,wo i3Jn E I. 111A, WA _ P:� t' 3 tJG 3 ^� -� 11 a 1} 33 •1 '2 '7 •� ,3 x n It :e F'K FG�U ea d 7 PL P FAgSHz JT:6 'ZpwS iINniJ V.P 137J ^ Coln anF IJ , aH13 r.Y� 4 at 1srn • , 16 � ...},a �' is.,, � y9] Tat i ! r 1 - x' t tal•l 7J; 3 $ 5 rt J' W � VT 1Ti. V.P TJd J Tr Sp Z� - rtj 1 ;3 l ,SJ E L' 1p ,l8 iL- i4. �_ 11G a_ 13 =:3 Y 1 FI.•� a tJ I5 a 47 ]yam IS F C 1J J7ini 4 x �nT 3 3 1�13 r� l U? t- _i-.� s?ry_t ..:fI �' i..B �w tl ` 7735-2021 1039 To Amend Schedule C as shown � To Add To Conservation — Urban Area Boundary N SCALE 1:61500 APPENDIX C Legend Yennadon Lands Urban Containment Boundary (MetroVancouver) Proposed Addition to Urban Containment Boundary down1----- t District of Langley The City of Maple Ridge makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy or present status of the information shown on this map. � Proposed Addition i to Urban Containment Boundary ,� � O PLANNING DEPARTMENT f , V �. � �L 1 � I N ma 'lend e.ca I �� p g h\ ��`.� '�—! d� ' FILE: YennadonLands.mxd Scale: 1:4,00� ��=RASE R`iJ�- �� DATE: Jun 22, 2020 BY: DT to ZAN at IV 111 a' r11 to mov me TIT .: --a ��3t�d Mo IPWI OEM All ij E• r ;�' ^tl.�.a.� s i tt ��ii iQl►uu Ntanma `-.i-5� .Ith"..,.��+� ........-... .�,t... �- �- i OF TEST ow AiLL�►r�a�li��' 4 4 i Owl." IFtip LIS .. _ i tt � 9 s too TwORIMMM IT,a '""' '�Sh of It I IS Imorit �MM 15 1 & V nits MIT open Maim Ila _! A41 INNER s so OEM f� lei E8 of ajPONMINT, A! 11;i 1,„ r '" `�}� �I #� .tlot Aw Tot 0 ;wasIt "''! • M — !�/ r• a .t r- IT ft lj A to tool_&3awa IT 40 =ri Appendix J Surnmary of Advisory Design Panel Resolutions Following presentations by the project Architect and Landscape Architect, the Advisory Design Panel made the following resolution that: That the Advisory Design Panel has reviewed application 2019-119-DP on September 151 20217 and recommends that the application be supported and the following concerns be addressed as the design develops and submitted to planning staff for follow-up (responses provided by the Architect and Landscape Architect are provided in italics). Architectural Comments: 1. Consider wrapping materials on east and west elevation around the south fagade; Incorporated on the elevation sheets and renderings. 2. Ensure adequate lighting above covered parking on south; Incorporated into the Enlarged Site Plan. 3. North elevation -consider sloped roof portion to be the same material as the wall; Incorporated on the elevation sheets and renderings. 4. Roof top screening consider extending the parapet to provide additional screening; Incorporated on the elevation sheets and renderings. 5. Provide articulation at material changes. Incorporated in the renderings. The dark metal panel sits 50mm proud of the white and wood textured metal panel. Landscape Comments: 1. Salix sitchensis can get large -may get too large for space (24'-35' height and width) good for wet soils. Recommend reviewing size of proposed tree symbols to ensure it shows mature size; This was noted and implemented - refer to tree plans. 2. Review mature size of trees to ensure adequate space - I.e. southwest corner at garbage; Noted and implemented - refer to tree plan. 3. Parking planting bed on east side against road; recommend proposing material that is broadleaf evergreen or conifer to min 1m height to screen car headlights into street -perennials are beautiful but not sure if there is full coverage; Noted and implemented - refer to planting plan. 4. Rosa nutkana may not adequately screen garbage area for all 4 seasons. Recommend a taller broadleaf evergreen shrub or conifer to screen garbage from street; Noted and implemented - refer to planting plan. 5. Recommend reviewing screening material on west and south to confirm adequate screening from parking and public visibility; Noted and implemented -refer to planting plan 6. Recommend showing tree protection fencing for all retained trees on all plans that --site plan - landscape, arch, civil, mechanical, electrical; Noted and implemented - refer to planting plan. 7. There is a fair amount of greenspace room in the site. Recommend considering additional rain gardens or bioswales to detain stormwater in landscape, Noted and implemented - refer to planting plan. 8. Recommend using either structural soil or soil cells where soil volume is lower. Trees to have CI minimum of 6 III volume of tree; The trees will be provided with the required structural soil. Noted and implemented -refer to the growing medium plan. 9. Consider adding parking islands with trees to screen and shade parking if possible; Noted and implemented -refer to trees plan and site plan prepared by architects. The revised parking stall numbers are on the architectural plans. 1Q. Consider possible signage or signal of intersection at horse trail and driveway entry to manage potential conflict; An example of signage was provided to the developer to be placed on the development side of the property line, as vehicles exit the parking lot onto 128 Ave 11. Consider adding low fence for separation between the pedestrian sidewalk and the horse trail. Staff did not support a low fence; there isn't anything similar to the west where the horse trail exists in a developed scenario. This would constrain the horse user into a narrow corridor which isn't ideal. -2- MAPLE RIDGE British Cotumbia mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: SUBJECT: Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7574-2019 12610 228 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: January 18, 2022 2019-239-RZ Cow An application has been received to rezone the subject property located at 12610 228 Street from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential), to permit a future subdivision of approximately eight lots over two phases. Phase 1 is subdividing the subject property into three lots, where the largest of these lots will be further subdivided into six lots in Phase 2. Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7574-2019 on October 29, 2019. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, Urban Residential Major Corridor policies. As per Council Policy 6.31, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program for the total new lot yield of 8 lots. Since the applicant is seeking the rezoning of the entire parcel at this time, the CAC contribution for the entire lots potential must be taken at the rezoning stage. The CAC rates in Policy 6.31 are currently under review and if approved at an upcoming Council meeting this application may be subject to new rates. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7574-2019 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and further 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: Road dedication on 126B Avenue plus cul-de-sac bulb, on 228 St, and corner truncation will be required as conditions of subdivision; ii. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management; III. Removal of existing buildings will be a condition for the second phase of subdivision; iv. In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; and further 2019-239-RZ Page 1 of 5 1102 v. That a voluntary contribution for a total of 8 lots in keeping with the Council Policy 6.31 with regard to Community Amenity Contributions, be provided. DISCUSSION: Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existi ng: Proposed: Don Bowins Lot 3 (RP22408) Section 20 Township 12 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 5430 Urban Residential Urban Residential Within Urban Area Boundary: Yes Area Plan: General OCP OCP Major Corridor: Yes, 228 Avenue Zoning: Existing: Proposed: RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) R-1(Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone. Designation: South: Use. Zone. Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone. Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area. Access: ry Seicing: Project Description: Single -Family Residential RS-1b (Single Detached (Medium Density) Residential) Urban Residential Single -Family Residential, and Multi -Family Residential RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential, and RM-1(Low Density Townhouse Residential) Urban Residential Single -Family Residential RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential 97% Agricultural, 3% Rural Residential Single -Family Residential RS-lb (Single Detached (Medium Density) Residential) Urban Residential Single -Family Residential Single -Family Residential 4430 m2 (1.09 acre) 126B Street Urban Standard The subject property is located at the south-east corner of the intersection of 126B Avenue and 228 Street. The property is relatively flat and is currently occupied by asingle-family dwelling and accessory residential building (see Appendices A and B). The applicant is proposing to rezone the 2019-239-RZ Page 2 of 5 property from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to 13-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) (see Appendix C) to allow for a future subdivision into approximately eight single family residential lots, where the applicant is intending to phase the subdivision to retain the existing home and accessory building for the time -being, and create two lots within the first phase of the subdivision and the remaining six lots in a second phase of subdivision. 3. Planning Analysis: i) Official Community Plan: The subject property is designated Urban Residential in the Official Community Plan (OCP). The subject property is located at the corner along 128 Avenue, which is classified Major Corridor and 126B Street. OCP policy 3-18 2) describes infill along a major corridor is intended for ground - oriented housing forms such as single detached dwellings, ii) Zoning Bylaw: garden suitesduplexestriplexes The subject application is proposing to rezone the property located at 12610 228 Street from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential). The subject property is 4430 m2 in area, and the proposed zone's minimum lot size is 371m2. Proposed new lots are ranging in area from 500 m2 to 600 m2 (see Appendix C). iii) Proposed Variances: A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves the following temporary relaxations (see Appendix D) due to the required road dedication. The DVP application is asking to reduce the exterior side yard setback requirement temporarily from 3.0 metres to 2.0 metres, until the existing dwelling will be demolished as a condition of the Phase 2 subdivision. 1. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019, Section 601.7, 1d To temporarily reduce the exterior side yard setback requirement, from 3.Om to 2.Om, until Phase 2 of the subdivision gets registered at Land Title Office The requested variance will be the subject of a future Council report. iv) Advisory Design Panel: The application is proposing single-family residential lots, and no review by the Advisory Design Panel is required. v) Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was held in the form of personal invites to commentary input, sent via mail -out and newspaper ad, inviting neighbours to review and comment the proposal between October 11 to October 21, 2021. 2019-239-RZ Page 3 of 5 One person contacted the developer, asking clarification to the existing fence. He expressed liking to look at this property's green back yard. Another person contacted the City file manager to obtain verbal clarification on details. No other issues were raised by the public needing clarification at this time. vi) Parkland Requirement: As there are more than two additional lots proposed to be created, the developer will be required to comply with the park dedication requirements of Section 510 of the Local Government Act prior to subdivision approval. For this project, there is no suitable land for park dedication on the subject property and it is therefore recommended that Council require the developer to to pay to the City an amount that equals the market value of 5% of the land required for parkland purposes. The amount payable to the City in lieu of park dedication must be derived by an independent appraisal at the developer's expense. Council consideration of the cash -in -lieu amount will be the subject of a future Council report. 4. Environmentallmplications: A tree permit will be required for removal of trees on and off site, and for protection of trees. Separate tree permits will be required for the separate phases if there will be substantial difference in timing of thelwo phases. 5. Interdepartmental Implications: i) Engineering Department: Referral review determined that upgrades and requirements will be conditions of the subdivision approval. No requirements under the rezoning file. 2019-239-RZ Page 4 of 5 Cd�1►LVINUMLWA►F It is recommended that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7574-2019, and that application 2019-23MZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. It is further recommended that Council require, as a condition of subdivision approval, the developer to pay to the City an amount that equals 5% of the market value of the land, as determined by an independent appraisal, in lieu of parkland dedication. "Original signed by Mark McMullen" for Prepared by: Therese Melser Planning Technician 'Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning 'Original signed by Charles Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services 'Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B - Ortho Map Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7574-2019 Appendix D - Subdivision Plan 2019-239-RZ Page 5 of 5 A�L��h��9DD0�s �� 5 12742 rn 12732 12747 12740 12733 er h o i � N N 5 12736 12735 N N N N N N 12737 92730 12729 127 AVE. 12728 27 12724 12727 N � O N N N N N N N M V h � ^ obi 23 12720 1271] N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 12719 12718 12710 12710 12709 12712 12711 7F 1� ^ O �- N M V l2]Q] N ' ^ N N N N N N i2703 12704 cNv 12701 127 AVE. � 127 PLACE �� � � o v � � �ry N N 12689 �� 12678 N N N N � ^ 12677 N N N N N N F� m n ^ � � � N N N 12671 � 12670 2013-028-RZ y N 12669 12655 � 1268AVE. �2658 � N SUBJECT PROPERTY 12652 N _ _ _ _ m �t N N � O � c� 1�6 �y`L N N N `���� 12643 1266 AV E. 12631 -- -- --- - _ �- � rn .- � � O N N V N N N N N N N 22.131 12610 __ _____ BALABANIAN CIRCLE - - N o 22733 12588 N � 22740 22710 N c~v 22700 N N N 12578 ^ 22750 22734 / N r. � N 22760 ,� ZZg15 � N N N N N N r°j o � 22735 � N <v � � N 22747 N �E, 126 AV N � N N N N 1258 P N 00 O O O �� ^ � � � N N N N � N N U N ^bpi w cn Cn N j N N N N N N ry � � ^ � N N N "' 12553 � N M � h N M t\ O O N N N N NN � w w N � O � � o� W N N N N N N N w j � N N N N N N N N � � . rn � � 125A AVE. 2272 9 22jS N N N N N N � ^ oNi oMi � obi `s N N N N N O � � co C N OJ o� o0i N N N N N LLj 125AAVE. coy N N N N � � � N N Q 22733 22754 N N N N N N N Q 22739 12477 `�' N 12522 r- 22743 12516 12515 � ��9� N 6 � ^ � � N !\ O �y, NNE ??j49 12510 12509 N� v � � � N �y`1,0� N ry rn cyry O - N N N N N N �298j N N N 889 Scale: 1:2,500 Legend Stream -� Ditch Centreline — -- Indefinite Creek — River Centreline ® Active Applications (RZ/SD/DP/VP) 12610 228 STREET PID: 011-136-502 FILE: 2019-239-RZ DATE: Jun 28, 2019 .... . MAPLE RIDGE 6ritish Columbia mapleridge.ca BY: PC #rev, ,C ►q4 all + ,� 'v ILI It r S xi ,I�`��(�• •' ; M4 IWO Ty, swap 7 law It. J 1. ' a !� 4 4 If ot wit; v I;k `` �' * r Tmu Z 40* lk- sarm All r- `+Lobo IL ��. AIP eke .sj �. �� ■ LIP -8 Ar ALI VI ItILI :. - LyJp.♦ -I.'".�.t=%; . - •Di: Zvi Far', p Idi 0 1 1 1 k l 9 1 dkIl —p III .lyIPI Job�"_ I •1 art+ r. ��•?' _ �T spry• ,� ILA 'blK OR WI Aw ,It kA NIII r` Z AM oil iw PLY�►•�*L� t •i?�. ►-1. 1 t��1• VV i,rtrf oI Ing two IL 4�l 66 41 I � ice• � '"a +c iYl. � 1� _ - "��rr•• ,i _ �' � � M��� rot WAR ' •' CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.7574-2019 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 - 2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 - 2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: Le This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7574-2019." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Parcel "A" (Reference Plan 22408) Lot 3 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 5430 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1808 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1(Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 - 2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 29th day of October 29, 2019. READ a second time the PUBLIC HEARING held the READ a third time the ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER day of day of day of 20 20 20 20 1 2 3 N N N N N 12703 N N N N N 12704 cNv ------------ U) 127 AVE. °O 127 PLACE N N O 1 12689 00 rn 12678 N N CO N N 03 N N 12677 10 N 9 N 8 N 7 N 6 637 1 20N N 21 22 CO B m LM 1270 N 12670 23 12671 19 cf) 12669 12655 B P 48 07 CO 24 1 2 3 4 5 Re AVE. �2668 LO LO N CO CO *PP1 18 � 12652 N N N N r� o �, 2 25 P 543 J N CV 16 17 12643 126E AVE. N 12631 1 973 26 P Q 262 A � �I 14t M � N N 366 367 � P 22408 (Yi Ni I M N CO N N N N N EP 68618A 22 3 a 12610 1 IAN CIRCLE 368 f 1 22733 12588 0 2 6926 397 CO ' 0 22740 P 77079 I P 84690 00 369 12578 2 M N 396 750 22734 4 ` W / / �� EP 83523 5 � P 6 262 22760 3 � \� / qt 395 370 o N / = ` I _ 1 ---- 22735 N M CO N lI ►I - EP 83521 22747 N 8 E. N �6N( 371 (0 EP 83522 Nrn I FAQ O l 21 w / M can M N '13 NN ,10 ii N CA 0 c+0�� M 372 o °' I 8 I� v 7 N A M/ ' `L�\ \� `p 6 1 I N ro`b 12553 5 1 g O I PAR P �� P 77 49 12 13 14 770 9 18 19 N 17to MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 7574-2019 Map No. 1808 From: RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) To: R-1(Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) N SCALE 1:1,718 APPENDIX D 1���1S 8ZZ CJ Z W f° Him Qom, m O OO � Y E 5 > "a m s z MAPLE RIDGE mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: SUBJECT: First and Second Reading Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7715-2021; Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7716-2021 25927 and 25801128 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: January 18, 2022 2021-062-RZ Cow An application for a Rezoning Text Amendment and Official Community Plan Amendment has been received for the subject properties located at 25927 and 25801 128 Avenue (see Appendices A, B, and C) to permit an Outdoor Commercial Recreation (outdoor paintball and laser tag) use. Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7716-2021 and considered the early consultation requirements for the Official Community Plan (OCP) amendment on March 30, 2021. The current application proposes an OCP Amendment (see Appendix D) to amend Policy 6-64 to add: Until policy 6-60 has been satisfied, uses that contribute to employment opportunities and do not require construction of permanent structures or servicing upgrades, may be considered on a case by case basis. The current application proposes to add a site -specific zoning text amendment to the A-2 zone to the properties located at 25927 and 25801 128 Avenue to permit the Outdoor Commercial Recreation (outdoor paintball and laser tag) use (see Appendix Q. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and ongoing consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7715-2021 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a Public Comment Opportunity, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw; 2. That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7715-2021 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 3. That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7715-2021 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7715-2021 be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 1103 2021-062-RZ Page 1 of 9 5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7716-2021 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and further 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule ; and ii) A covenant registered on title indicating the general area to be used for paintball and laser tag, the associated parking relating to paintball and laser tag, and that any buildings or structures to be constructed in support of these outdoor commercial recreational uses be temporary. DISCUSSION: 1) Background Context: Applicant: Delta Force Canada Properties Limited, referred to as "Delta Force" Legal Description: Parcel 1 and Parcel A both of Part SW1/4 Section 25 Township 12 New Westminster District OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: Industrial Reserve, Rural Resource, Agricultural Industrial Reserve, Rural Resource, Agricultural A-2 (Upland Agricultural) A-2 (Upland Agricultural) North: Use: Civic, First Responder Training College Zone: A-2 (Upland Agricultural), P-6 (Civic Institutional) Designation: Rural Resource South: Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 Single Detached Rural Residential Designation: Agricultural East: Use: Industrial and City -owned Conservation lands Zone: M-2 (General Industrial) Designation: Industrial Reserve, Rural Resource, Conservation West: Use: Residential and Agricultural Zone: A-2 (Upland Agricultural), A-1(Small Holding Agricultural) Designation: Industrial Reserve, Agricultural, Rural Resource 2021-062-RZ Page 2 of 9 2) 3) Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property. Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Project Description: Resource Extraction, Media Production Studio (outdoor) Resource Extraction, Media Production Studio (outdoor), Outdoor Commercial Recreation (outdoor paintball and laser tag) 32.31 ha (79.9 acres) 128 Avenue Rural Standard The proposed Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment and Official Community Plan Amendment to permit Outdoor Commercial Recreation use will allow outdoor paintball and laser tag as a use within a defined portion of forested land in the southern part of the subject properties (see Appendices A, B, C, and F). The applicant will not be clearing the majority of the site for development, as the intent is to utilize the heavily treed lots for five (5) `game zones' (see Appendix F). The smallest of these zones will be approximately 1170m2 (12,570ft2) and largest will be approximately 2840m2 (40,500.0ft2). All customer parking will be contained on the site in a designated gravel parking area fully screened from 128th Avenue. The approximate 3500m2 (37,673ft2) carpark will be the only area of clearing and will be surfaced in gravel. All proposed structures will be temporary and moveable to allow for a high level of adaptability. No permanent structures are planned for the site. Delta Force hopes to receive approval for a maximum capacity of 150 patrons per session during the busiest periods of the year (e.g. summer holidays). During the winter months they expect 10-30 patrons per session. Staff numbers would fluctuate seasonally and be based on the number of patrons. A maximum capacity of 150 patrons in the summer would have ten (10) staff members on site. The project aims to offer a recreational opportunity that allows for physical exercise and socializing in a natural setting. This use, when combined with the nearby (indoor) BMX facility and Wild Play, will contribute to a growing tourist recreational node developing in the northeast quadrant of the City. At this time the application has been referred departments and agencies, and its Environmental Environmental Planning Staff as outlined below. Planning Analysis: i) Official Community Plan: to the relevant internal and external Management Plan has been reviewed by The subject properties are designated Rural Resource, Industrial Reserve, and Agricultural in the OCP. The Agricultural designated portion (8%) is located within the Agricultural Land Reserve. The following policies provide policy context for the Rural Resource and Industrial Reserve land uses. 6-49 Rural Resource Industrial lands are located in the northern portion of the community and provide for a range of general industrial, heavy industrial and high 2021-062-RZ Page 3 of 9 impact resource based industrial uses following the removal of gravel resources on these lands. 6-58 Maple Ridge will expand the 256th Street Industrial Area, generally located north of 128th and east / west of 256th Street, by retaining certain lands as Industrial Reserve in order to supply industrial lands for long term industrial uses while preserving such lands from competing uses. 6-59 The ongoing intensification of the lands designated Rural Resource, Industrial and Institutional in the 256th Street Industrial Area is encouraged prior to the redevelopment of lands identified as Industrial Reserve. 6-60 As well, prior to industrial development occurring on the Industrial Reserve designated land within the 256th Street Industrial Area, the following must have been fulfilled: a) A right-of-way and alignment option, potentially extending the 128th Avenue / Abernethy Way corridor or other alternative routes to the 256th Street Industrial Area, has been established to accommodate industrial traffic through the City, minimizing community and environmental impacts; and b) A servicing analysis has been completed to identify any possible servicing impacts and, if required, approval of an extension to the Fraser Sewer Area by the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District (GVS&DD) Board is achieved; and c) Completion of a gravel supply assessment to identify gravel resources within the 256th Street Industrial Area; and d) Council has determined that under policy 6.59 sufficient utilization of the land designated Rural Resource, Industrial and Institutional in the 256th Street Industrial Area has been achieved to warrant consideration of further industrial development. 6-61 Until Policy 6-60 has been satisfied, the minimum parcel size for subdivision of land designated Industrial Reserve is 4 hectares, noting that such advance subdivision is strongly discouraged unless the Issues and Objectives of Section 6.4.3 are advanced. 6-62 At the time when the Industrial Reserve designated lands will be considered for development, the following must have been satisfied prior to permitting industrial development: a) Completion of an OCP Amendment identifying the lands as `Industrial' or `Rural Resource' rather than `Industrial Reserve'; and b) Approval by the Metro Vancouver Board of an amended Regional Growth Strategy and Regional Context Statement identifying the lands regionally as `Industrial' rather than `Rural' is provided; and c) Removal of identified gravel reserves, unless the subject property is identified in Figure 3 of the Official Community Plan, which identifies potential sources of gravel in the City, in which case gravel removal may take place prior to the need for the OCP Amendment outlined in 6-62(a). 6-63 While not a requirement of Policy 6-62, at the time when the Industrial Reserve designated land will be considered for development, the creation of a new zone that would permit general mixed employment uses may be warranted, in order to accommodate a mix of light industrial, institutional and heavy industrial zones. 2021-062-RZ Page 4 of 9 6-64 Notwithstanding policies 6-60 and 6-62, Institutional proposals that align with existing zoning on `Industrial Reserve' or `Rural Resource' land, showing demonstrable benefits to the community, may be encouraged. In terms of the subject proposal, the extent of the paintball and laser tag operation will be limited to the Industrial Reserve designated lands. No encroachment on ALR lands is anticipated apart from the slight driveway expansion which the applicant has received written approval from the Agricultural Land Commission. Gravel extraction is currently in progress in the northern portion of the site, and the proposed paintball and laser tag use will not impede ongoing gravel extraction. As outlined in the OCP, lands designated Industrial Reserve are identified to provide the long-term supply of industrial land pending the satisfaction of four criteria set out in Policy 6-60 which have yet to be completed. The paintball and laser tag business proposal is limited to 2.4 hectares (6.0 acres) of the total 32.31 hectares (79.9 acres) in the two subject properties. The applicant does not propose the construction of any permanent structures, nor require any servicing. As a result, the proposed use is not considered `development' and therefore not expected to negatively impact the envisioned industrial future, including gravel removal. In order to issue a business license for the paintball and laser tag use on the subject properties, an OCP text amendment is required to Schedule A (see Appendix D) to create new policy language for the Industrial Reserve land use designation. The new revised Policy 6.64 will continue to protect the future of the Industrial Reserve lands for long term employment uses in favour of competing uses, while providing some flexibility for businesses with little to no development impact. The proposed new policy states: Notwithstanding policies 6-60 and 6-62, Institutional proposals that align with existing zoning on `Industrial Reserve' or `Rural Resource' land, showing demonstrable benefits to the community, may be encouraged. Until policy 6-60 has been satisfied, uses that contribute to employment opportunities and do not require construction of permanent structures or servicing upgrades, may be considered on a case by case basis. To permit outdoor paintball and laser tag, a zoning text amendment to the A-2 zone is also required to permit the Outdoor Commercial Recreation use on this site. It is recognized that there are limited suitable sites for paintball and laser tag uses in the community, and that the subject properties lend themselves to the use given the parcel size, vegetation and topography of the site, and the rural neighbourhood context. Additionally, the proposed use does not constitute `development' in that there are no permanent structures or servicing required that would preclude the future employment uses within the current Industrial Reserve designation. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to add asite-specific zoning text amendment to the A-2 Zone to the properties located at 25927 and 25801 128 Avenue to permit the Outdoor Commercial Recreation (outdoor paintball and laser tag) use (see Appendix E). 2021-062-RZ Page 5 of 9 iii) Off- Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: The Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw requirements for the Outdoor Commercial Recreational are three (3) space per hole for golf courses and one (1) space per slip for marinas. The proposed paintball and laser tag uses are not included within the parking requirements for Outdoor Commercial Recreation. However, this application will be assessed as an Outdoor Commercial Recreational use similarly to golf courses in which three (3) parking spaces are required per hole. On the basis of an 18-hole golf course, the proposed paintball / laser tag operation would be assessed 54 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing 68 spaces on a gravel parking lot. Further to the above, the maximum number of 150 players and ten (10) staff on site during the busiest season of summer should not translate to 160 cars on site. Delta Force states that they host multiple events (e.g. birthday, pre -wedding parties, and corporate functions) in which they encourage carpooling. Similar operations in Barrie and Ottawa in Ontario have a car to patron ratio of about one car to four patrons (0.25 car per patron) and Strathmore and Sherwood Park in Alberta have a ratio around one car to three patrons (0.33 cars per patron). The proposed parking area in the applicant's plans will hold 68 cars (see page 2 of Appendix F), Delta Force states that the industry standard of 0.3 cars per patron would result in 150 patrons, the maximum number Delta Force hopes to be permitted, requiring a maximum of 45 cars. On this basis, the proposed number of 68 spaces should be able to accommodate the peak number of 150 patrons and approximately ten staff. There is no on -street parking in this rural setting and parking outside the covenanted area or within the portion of the site in the Agricultural Land Reserve will not be permitted. It is in the applicant's business interests to ensure that there is adequate parking and suitable alternatives to driving (e.g. private group shuttles for group events). iv) Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for all developments within 50m of the top of bank of all watercourses and wetlands (see page 6). The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. v) Development Information Meeting (Public Comment Opportunity during Covid-19): Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was not possible for the developer to host an in -person Development Information Meeting. In lieu of Development Information Meetings, an interim process has been established to allow for a ten-day Public Comment Opportunity. The notification requirements are the same as for the Development Information Meeting and include a mail -out, newspaper advertisements, and notice on the development signs that provides the contact information for the developer and the Public Comment period. A Public Comment Opportunity was held starting on May 18 to the end of May 28, 2021. Two people provided comment directly to the applicant during this period. Nine people commented directly with the Planning Department during this period, two of which were the 2021-062-RZ Page 6 of 9 same two who commented directly to the applicant. Two other people provided comment to the file manager before and after the ten-day period for a total of 11 residents. A summary of the main comments and discussions with the attendees was provided by the applicant and include the following main points: • Noise • Environmental Impacts • Traffic • Paintballs flying outside of the area • Alcohol, substance use and related disturbances The applicant has prepared a summary report relating to comments received during this Public Comment Opportunity and ways that the applicant proposes to negate or mitigate issues raised (see Appendix G). 4) Environmentallmplications: An Environmental Assessment was conducted by Delta Force's Qualified Environmental Professional to identify sensitive environmental features. Delta Force's Environmental Professional has worked with the applicant on the site plan and has proposed an operational plan that complies with all environmental/habitat setback areas for the adjacent watercourses. An Operational Environmental Management Plan has been prepared to ensure that the proposed business operations do not impact the adjacent environment and sensitive habitat. The applicant has agreed to perform annual impact assessments as part of their Operational Environmental Management Plan. 5) Agriculturallmplications: No portion of the site within the ALR will be used as part of the Outdoor Commercial Recreational use. The site is currently 100% zoned A-2 Upland Agricultural, however, given the gravel extraction, watercourses, the grade of the site, and the forest cover of the site, no agricultural impact is foreseen. 6) Interdepartmentallmplications: i. Engineering Department: The application does not trigger any infrastructure upgrades. ii. Building Department: There are no proposed buildings, and any portable and/or temporary structures that meet the Building Permit threshold will require a permit. Shipping Containers will require venting and permits, and the applicant was provided the City of Maple Ridge's Shipping Container Guide. Parks, Recreation and Culture Department: No concerns, as there doesn't appear to be any conflicts or impacts on the trail or park system. iv. Fire Department: No Concerns. v. Bylaw &Licensing Services: 1. The intended use is Outdoor Commercial Recreation and there must be expectations of this as a business model (office +outdoor space). This cannot morph into an outdoor gathering space that becomes a rustic cafe for a post -game hot coffee/beer. The applicant has been made aware by Planning Staff about the expectations and limitations of the proposal regarding the intended Business use. 2021-062-RZ Page 7 of 9 2. There is no Business License category for paintball or laser tag "Sports & Recreation Centre - Unclassified" would be the most likely use. 3. This property is in bear country, the facility needs to provide adequate garbage receptacles and they need to comply with the Wildlife & Vector Control Bylaw. 4. Noise complaints will be investigated and assessed for compliance and acceptability in the residential neighbourhood. 5. There should be no violations of the Highway & Traffic Bylaw. 6. Signage needs to be in complaint with the Sign Bylaw. 7) School District No. 42: A referral was sent and there are no impacts on student population as no residences are being proposed. 8) Intergovernmentallssues: i) Local Government Act: An amendment to the OCP requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 477 of the Local Government Act. The amendment required for this application, No. 7715- 2021, is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined, that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no i m pact. 9) Alternative Should a less permanent option to the OCP and Zoning Bylaw text amendments be desired, an alternative is a Temporary Use Permit. A Temporary Use Permit would allow for the Outdoor Commercial Recreation use, if granted by Council, for a period of three (3) years which could be extended up to one time for another three (3) year period. The Temporary Use Permit process has recently changed, and now provides a faster, lower cost option for applicants to pursue uses that are not permitted in the property's zoning for a limited time duration. 2021-062-RZ Page 8 of 9 CONCLUSION: There are limited suitable sites for paintball and laser tag uses in the community. The subject properties lend themselves to the proposed Outdoor Commercial Recreational use given the parcel size, vegetation and topography of the site, and the rural neighbourhood context. Additionally, the proposed use does not constitute `development' in that there are no permanent structures or servicing required that would preclude the future employment uses within the current Industrial Reserve designation It is recommended that first and second reading be given to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7715-2021, that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7716-2021, and that application 2021-062-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. "Original signed by Mark McMullen" for Prepared by: Brandon Djordjevich, M.PL Planning Technician 'Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning 'Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services 'Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B - Ortho Map Appendix C - Proposed Site Area with OCP Designations Appendix D - OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7715-2021 Appendix E - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7716-2021 Appendix F - Site Plan Appendix G - Public Comment Opportunity Summary Report 2021-062-RZ Page 9 of 9 END N A tt t SUBJECT PROPERTIES t t t 1 e 2020=312-DP vxxxM 2018-013-DP *13 t 1 2018=442-DP t � 2017-374=DP '/ Cdft i t N a2L2042416=004=DP�2 Legend -3 Stream --- Ditch Centreline — — • Indefinite Creek Lake or Reservoir 25927 / 25801 128 AVE 013-301-764 / 013-301-802 PLANNING DEPARTMENT British Cotumbia mapleridge.ca Scale: 1:6,500 I ®Active Applications (RZ/SD/DP/VP) I FILE: 2020-062-RZ DATE: Feb 3, 2021 BY: BD Legend -=_ „ Ditch Centreline =y C -� Indefinite Creek 25927 / 25801 128 AVE 013-301-764 / 013-301-802 PLANNING DEPARTMENT mapleridge.ca Scale: 1:6,500 Lake or Reservoir FILE: 2020-062-RZ DATE: Feb 3, 2021 �'�' 5 1` 3 C � ��' J Scale: 1:6,500 -�- r .. Leaend SUBJECT PROPERTIES ------�; � D �E Agricuhural i 'Park Forest Suburban Residential I � Industrial Industrial Reserve Institutional Rural Resource Conservation C CO V 25927 / 25801 128 AVE 013-301-764 / 013-301-802 PLANNING DEPARTMENT -- W + . , Legend "; r -- Ditch Centreline IYiapleridge.ca Indefinite Creek FILE: 2020-062-RZ - Lake or Reservoir DATE: Feb 3, 2021 �• � • BY: BD CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7715-2021 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule "B" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7715-2021." 2. The following text in Policy 6-64: "Notwithstanding policies 6-60 and 6-62, Institutional proposals that align with existing zoning on `Industrial Reserve' or `Rural Resource' land, showing demonstrable benefits to the community, may be encouraged." is hereby amended as follows: "Notwithstanding policies 6-60 and 6-62, Institutional proposals that align with existing zoning on `Industrial Reserve' or `Rural Resource' land, showing demonstrable benefits to the community, may be encouraged. Until 6-60 has been satisfied, uses that contribute to employment opportunities and do not require construction of permanent structures or servicing upgrades, may be considered on a case by case basis." 3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 30th day of March, 2021. READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLlC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0.7716-2021 A Bylaw to amend the text %J Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended. NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7716-2021". 2. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 is hereby amended as follows: Section 502 A-2 Upland Agricultural, 502.2 Permitted Principal Uses is amended by adding the following: (i) Outdoor Commercial Recreation limited to outdoor paintball and laser tag, the associated parking of outdoor paintball and laser tag, and non -permanent structures used for play and preparation on the parcels described as. 25927 128 Avenue -Parcel "A" (Reference Plan 3015) of the South West Quarter Section 25 Township 12 except: Parcel "ONE" (Reference Plan 17316) New Westminster Land District 25801 128 Avenue -Parcel "ONE" (Reference Plan 17316) of Parcel "A" (Reference Plan 3015) of the South West Quarter Section 25 Township 12 New Westminster Land District 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 30th day of March, 2021. READ a second time the READ a third time the day of PRESIDING MEMBER Aay of , 20 day of , 20 20 CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX F i+ > O a o a a; � o W m � n { : � ai �0U 0 J C) n v Q II O N (U �J E —_ %1 P 0 T' O ui Q � A 0 c.� o I r c0 e) LO m > 0) M co Q 00 C n off cu r- m Qi 0o N Lo 0 S �C4 0 N 0) 00 r) 5 C1 c °- N cu ro U CD cn W Y i O O O >�c 2oQ>Z`o Q C () iu �i U) N UO a a L C o > 3 0 o c o m.a o >+c coi c a)aa)'� c 3 c —cu o.aoZ2o N o iu c c a) 1C ma (0 a a) cci cu > °xa)m�� o E oo �cucm`�m W 0_ < `0 0 t c v .0 a) °)c � 'a m Y �p 12 '0 'oO M 00 j I I O N 00 w a 0 a)> N44 V fl va coE a) °m�a) N N'� C N ,C E C a) �p N c; E m o `m a� Q. v a) aci c a a) o c �o E n 0 a)> c o 0 ca voiQ aai°- 3E (00 0 QN 0 0.0 L. a� 3c a� LL1 `� 0 as a) ma) cam o� r'E rna F' U Z U` Q N r Q) i .Q i � � N � :Y G � � •C �� � O .Q (CS 0 o N j �.a � nj � p rn � J J � U "L7 -Q � � O � � � O C c o � i to U � rn _ a� co � N ,� � U L. i � a .n � � °- a� a� � ° a�i L. � ° p � O N o IL � m � � � � �' N� N V W � ~ � Z � C w � p Q O (6 � O � p C C� Q �.. s.. .r O) N _ o ,_ _ � ` _I I N � (U (6 � .0 (II ql ° � o � U N O L L- N = � ('3 O � � Q � U' 00 U � .J cn � W U Q 0.. � O � •r � O � � � C o� Q- N � �` N � � - - tq C � O -p � � LO O'C � O ¢�� � � � ova°•°�� `nm� °conE �� Y �-- __ Q H J ca E c k I— �-� Q�� i i, ° .� L _ ctCi G L J fq (0 N 5 I Q � • r I N O N O � � ui � � Q C`d ,� I �,\A �� - �� `� <<- Q ���� ` i �ja � �r 3- _ _ �� L I� � � �� {�1 / L � (��). t g 2 _ �� o � N � - - � p U Q. rO � - '� ?�mO :� ° o^ U o � � � .� � � rn —Q rn (Q r � �%� �— .� � � •(� c- .-. C h N � O � i ,� � L.() � � U � O Q.� N N p � � (� 5 n � W 0 O d W W U U d M U) U) O O Z Z QQ LO O �i x LO ED �I \ a �I o 0 W �y / / v gyp•/ � / i. titi." v� / \�\ \""C�\rye• .. 'Y,� ' .�.i� � t`s \ \ \ v \ � \ rye•'/ w o / f!1 --v:-- Y U Z � W �- T T _ `o T L �N Q d z c 0 € - w e - � C €. m =_ cn a �3 Q Z 2 w � w h U � w o CCC J Q m w h � Z � Q �- � d � to O O � d U O Z ce a 7 s s= e3 d © APPENDIX G Public Comment Opportunity A Public Comment Opportunity was held between 18�h May 2021 and 2z3 May 2021 whereby loca) residents had the opportunity to provide their opinions about the proposed development. All residents in the immediate area received an informational pamphlet via letterbox drop conducted by Delta Force Paintball and a Public Comment Opportunity letter delivered via registered mail. There was an approved development board erected outside the proposed location and Delta Force Paintball advertised the proposed development in the local newspaper as per the requirements outlined by the City of Maple •Ridge. The responses to the Public Comment Opportunity could be submitted directly to Delta Force Paintball or to the City of Maple Ridge (or to both), and the results were collated and documented below under the following headings: 1. Summarised Concerns from the Public 2. Delta Force Paintball Responses to the Summarised Concerns from the Public 3. Review of Individual Public Comments Summarised Concerns from the Public The key summarised points raised as a result of the Public Comment Opportunity are documented below: i Concern #1-Noise: o The paintball operation could disturb farm animals in the area by introducing unfamiliar, abrupt and loud noises. o The paintball operation could disturb native v✓i:dlife in the area by introducing unfamiliar, abrupt and loud noises. o The paintball operation could disturb local residents in the area by introducing unfamiliar, abrupt and loud noises, including the noise generated by additional traffic. o The paintball operator uses loud explosives and air horns during their operation. ➢ Concern #2 -Environmental: o The paintball operation could disturb the native habitat of local wildlife. o The paintball operation could damage the watercourses in the area. o The paintball operation could disturb native flora in the area. o The paintball operation could remove the native flora that exists in the area. ➢ Concern #3 -Traffic: o The paintball operation could bring additional traffic to the area. o The additional traffic brought to the area by the paintball operation could spook horses when being ridden down the main road, thus causing them to bolt or throw their riders off. o The local road network is not equipped to handle additional traffic. r Concern #4 -Litter/Waste: o The paintball operation could bring additional litter to the area. �- Concern #5 -Violence/Antisocial Behaviour: o The paintball operation could bring violent and/or antisocial individuals to the area. o The paintball operation could provide an opportunity for people to drink or take drugs in the area. o Paintball as a sport encourages participants to do unsafe and violent things. o The applicant encourages players to shoot paintball guns in the streets. �- Concern #6 -Aesthetic: o The paintball operation could negatively affect the visual appearance of the property and the local area by clearing land and erecting props and facilities that are visible from the road. r Concern #7 -Land Use: o The land 0s to be used for agriculture and industry —not recreation. Delta Force Paintball Responses to the Summarised Concerns from the Public Delta Force Paintball has provided a comprehensive overview response to these various concerns listed above, along with individual responses to each of the individual Public Comments. The comprehensive overview response to each point is as follows: � Concern #1-Noise; o The paintball operation will be setup with significant buffers between the operational areas and all neighbouring boundaries. There will be a 100m+ buffer from 128 Ave and a 60m+ buffer from the closest neighbouring boundary to the west. These buffer zones are introduced by Delta Force Paintball to reduce any noise that is able to travel to these key neighbouring locations. o These buffer zones are characterised by dense secondary and tertiary growth forest. This will act as a further physical, visual and acoustic barrier, further reducing the distance that any generated noise can travel. kF o Paintball guns work off compressed air and therefore let off a dull popping sound rather than a loud bang/explosion sound like normal guns do. The guns that Delta Force Paintball will use at the centre fire smaller projectiles, which reduces the noise generated with each pull of the trigger. This is yet another step to reduce the distance that the noise can travel out of any operational area. o The noise generated by the discharge of a paintball is approximately 80 dB, which then attenuates to approximately 46 dB at a distance of SOm. This attenuated measurement does not factor in the further noise -reducing impact of dense forest, so the registered sound readings at any neighbouring properties will be even lower. The lowest typical limit of ambient urban sound is 40 dB. o Delta Force Paintball has confirmed that they will not use any air horns or whistles on the premises, and that the only pyrotechnic to be used is a silent smoke pyrotechnic. o Delta Force Paintball engaged the services of an external QEP to develop an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the proposed location. Part of the EMP identified all of the wildlife in the area, and it documented how the paintball centre must operate in order to minimise or completely avoid any harmful impact on these animals. Any approved Business License would be contingent on Delta Force Paintball's compliance with the requirements outlined in this EMP. This includes but it not limited to operating with exclusion zones around any nesting areas for all relevant birds so that the noise generated by the paintball operation does not have any adverse effect on them. ➢ Concern #2 - Environmental: o Delta Force Paintball engaged the services of an external QEP to conduct an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed location. Part of the EA identified and plotted the various watercourses throughout the property to ensure that the paintball operation adheres to a minimum exclusion zone of 30m from any watercourse. The EA identified that no watercourse would be impacted by the paintball operation, and it concluded that no protective fencing is required beyond the introduction of a double strand rope boundary line around the perimeter of all playing areas. o The EA suggested that no land -clearing take place between March 1— August 31 in order to avoid any undue impact to nesting birds. Delta Force Paintball has confirmed that they will adhere to this recommendation. o Delta Force Paintball engaged the services of an external QEP to develop an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the proposed location. Part of the EMP identified all of the wildlife in the area, and it documented how the paintball centre must operate in order to minimise or completely avoid any harmful impact on these animals. This includes but it not limited to operating with exclusion zones around any nesting areas for all relevant birds so that the noise generated by the paintball operation does not have any adverse effect on them: o The EMP outlined the commitment from Delta Force Paintball to follow a range of steps designed to minimise any impact on the native vegetation in the area, including but not limited to: ■ Orientating games in an east -west direction to avoid the possibility of paintballs entering the 30m exclusion zone of any watercourse. ■ Erecting boundary ropes and signage around each playing area to ensure players are restricted to the designated areas. ■ Limit the vegetation removal to 20 small trees (<10cm diameter) in the parking area and then leaving all remaining trees untouched. ■ Only utilising gravel from the northern gravel mine for any base surfacing requirements. ■ Operate with a single central walkway to the playing areas to limit disturbance to surrounding areas. ■ Keeping one of the five game zones closed for 12 months at a time to facilitate vegetation. o The paintball operation is built using non -permanent structures that are removed at the conclusion of the rental period. This ensures that there are no long term affects of the paintball business beyond the tenancy period. Car park and base camp surfacing materials will be sourced from onsite (via the gravel mine to the north) and the base camp structures are shipping containers, temporary fencing, tents and 'picnic benches that are easily and quickly removed. The game zone props consist of school buses, timber village huts, barrel stacks and other props that can be removed from site. ➢ Concern #3 'Traffic. o Delta Force Paintball has conceded that it's an unavoidable by-product of its business (and of any business for that matter) that some level of additional traffic will be brought to the area. The business has an existing policy of actively encouraging players to car pool to the location so as to minimise additional traffic and to reduce the volume on onsite parking. o The paintball operation is primarily weekend based, which coincides with the significantly quieter period for the neighbouring industrial park. Delta Force Paintball is of the opinion that the local road network is suitably equipped to handle additional traffic generated by the weekend paintball players because the mid -week traffic generated by the industrial park far exceeds that of the paintball business. o Delta Force Paintball is also of the opinion that the personal vehicle traffic generated by the paintball operation would be less invasive to local residents and to local horse riders than that of trucks and other such vehicles using the neighbouring industrial park. ➢ Concern #4 -litter/Waste; o Delta Force Paintball is committed to providing a clean and tidy environment that extends beyond just the leased area. The company has built a nationwide network of world class paintball venues through the implementation and maintenance of high standards. A dirty entrance to the facility — which extends 100m either side of the entrance gate — reflects poorly on the business as first impressions are formed before a customer even enters the property. o As part of the existing Delta Force Paintball systems and procedures, a comprehensive litter pick is done at the start and end of each game day so as to maintain high standards of cleanliness. o Furthermore, Delta Force Paintball is committed to operating as a positive member of the local community, and the business understands that maintaining the natural beauty of the surrounding area is a vital part of this. o The paintball operation plans to partner with local waste and effluent collection companies — as it does with all other locations across Canada —to ensure suitable waste collection points and WCs are available onsite. These environmentally friendly plans are outlined as part of the EMP. Concern #5 •Violence/Antisocial Behaviour; o Paintball is an outdoor adventure activity that is a team -based sport anchored around communication, achieving structured objectives and rule -following. There's no correlation between playing paintball and an elevated inclination to act in a violent way. o Delta Force Paintball players are encouraged to move on from the centre once their event has concluded, and a rigorous, physical activity such as paintball doesn't lend itself to drinking or taking drugs before, during or after an event. There's no increased likelihood of people drinking or taking drugs after a paintball event compared to any other social or sporting event. o Delta Force Paintball demonstrates that the sport of paintball exhibits a far lower rate of injury than any mainstream sport. Likewise, the business asserts that all Delta Force Paintball centres operate under strict rules that ensure a safe, compliant and welcoming environment rather than one that encourages violence and antisocial behaviour. Delta Force Paintball's target markets include first time players, family groups, birthday parties, end of season sporting team breakups, corporate team -building events, etc. None of these demographics are recognised'as violent or antisocial gI oups. o Delta Force Paintball maintains a high level of professionalism across all areas, and this extends to the marketing material that it produces. The company vehemently disagrees with the suggestion that it openly encourages violent and/or antisocial behaviour through its marketing material. o Delta Force Paintball also notes that a member of the public claims to have been threatened that her house will be "paintballed" if the paintball application is rejected. The company wishes to distance itself from any connection to this claim and alleged threat, and it opposes any threatening behaviour whatsoever. Concern #6 -Aesthetic: o The visual perspective of the proposed location will remain unchanged from 128 Ave, other than the erection of a two-sided street sign that will direct customers to the paintball centre. The front third of the total block is ALR land and therefore cannot be touched by the paintball operation. This area will remain a popular habitat for local wildlife along with the various other parts of untouched forest throughout the property, and it will continue to be visually appealing to passers-by. Websters Creek — which runs to the south west of the proposed paintball area — and the tributary of Websters Creek will remain untouched and will continue to feed the watercourse(s) further to the south. Y Concern #6 -Land Use: o Approximately 6% of the total double block will be leased to Delta Force Paintball. Approximately 15% will remain as part of the active gravel mine, approximately 19% will remain available in the dedicated filming area, approximately 14% is zoned ALR land and the remaining 46% will continue to be untouched forest. With less than 6% of the land being rezoned to recreational use, the overarching agricultural and industrial use will remain. Review of Individual Public Comments Comment 1: Date Received: 9th May 2021 Method of Receipt: Received directly from member of the public via email in response to the letterbox drop from Delta Force Paintball Freedom of Information Protection of Privacy Act II Public Member's Name: (Severed port ns are)shaded) Key Points. 1. The immediate area is currently used for the purpose of farming and is home to various farm animals. The noises generated by the paintball operation could be disturbing to the animals. 2. People ride their horses up and down 128 Ave and the sound of paintball gun shots could spook a horse, causing it to bolt. This could potentially injure or kill someone. 3. Traffic to the location could increase, which could be unpleasurable to local residents. - Key Responses: 1. The proposed centre is positioned 100m+ from 128 Ave and 60m+from the closest neighbouring boundary to the west. There's dense secondary and tertiary growth forest between the operational areas of the paintball centre and any neighbouring property which will act as a further physical, visual and acoustic barrier. Paintball guns work off compressed air and therefore let off a dull popping sound rather than a loud explosion sound like normal guns do. Likewise, the guns that the centre will use fire smaller projectiles and therefore are even quieter than normal paintball guns. The noise generated by the paintball operation will be less than the existing ambient noise in the area from existing traffic and existing operations. 2. Previous acoustic reports conducted by Delta Force Paintball, along with their experience at other locations that operate adjacent to horse stables and ranches, indicate that the noise generated by the paintball operation will not scare any horses and/or spook them in any way. Likewise due to the large buffer the noise cannot travel that far so as to disturb animals and/or residents. 3. Traffic will increase, but not to a level that would surpass the capabilities of the existing infrastructure. Delta Force Paintball is busiest when the industrial park up the road is quietest, so the additional traffic brought to the area wouldn't be greater than the traffic along 128 Ave on each day mid -week. Comment 2: Date Received: 19" May 2021 Method of Receipt: Received directly from member of the public via email in response to the letterbox drop from Delta Force Paintball Freedom of Information Protection of Privacy AU Public Member's Name: (Severed Section portionssare shaded) Key Points: 1. The Paintball operation states there will be two session times. What's to stop the operational hours from increasing? 2. There's a buffer between 128 Ave and the paintball operation. What's to stop this buffer from being cleared by the paintball operator? 3, The paintball operation may bring additional noise to the area. 4. What is in place to stop players from drinking and using drugs outside of the Paintball operation? 5. Will paintball bring violent people to the area? 6. Will the paintball operation increase litter in the area? - Itey Responses: 1. There's not enough daylight to operate more session times, and most business licences are limited to pre -agreed operational hours. It is expected that the Delta Force Paintball business license will hold similar restricted trade hours based on available seasonal daylight hours. 2. The front portion of the block that operates as a buffer is ALR land therefore cannot be touched by the Paintball operation. 3. The noise generated by the paintball operation is less than the existing ambient noise generated by existing traffic and by the mining operation. The centre will operate with large buffer zones of dense wooded forest (100m+ from the road and 60m+ from the closest neighbour to the west) which will act as an acoustic barrier, Likewise, the guns to be used fire a smaller projectile and are quieter than standard paintball guns and much quieter than normal firearms. 4. Players are encouraged to move on once their event has concluded, and a rigorous, physical activity such as paintball doesn't lend itself to drinking or taking drugs before, during or after an event. There's no increased likelihood of people drinking or taking drugs after a paintball event compared to any other social event. 5. There's no correlation between playing paintball and an elevated inclination to act in a violent way. Paintball is a team - based sport anchored around communication, objectives and rule -following. 6. A successful business requires a clean environment — including the roadway into the centre — as first impressions are quickly formed and they last a long time. Delta Force Paintball is committed to maintaining a clean environment in order to attract customers and deliver a professional experience. Comment 3: - Date Received: 29th May 2021 - Method of Receipt: Forwarded by Brandon Djordjevich via email Public Member's Name: Name removed by Brandon Djordjevich at the request of the individual Key Points: 1. Traffic could increase because of the paintball operation. Lots of vehicles speed along 128 Ave and this can cause horses to spook, throwing their riders off. - Key Responses: 1. The paintball operation will bring personal vehicle traffic to the area rather than significant truck traffic as is currently generated by the recently developed industrial park up the road. The traffic generated by paintball will be far less than the current level of traffic, and there's nothing to suggest that paintball patrons are more or less inclined to follow the road rules and corresponding speed limits. A truck passing a rider on a horse is far more likely to spook the horse than a personal vehicle passing a rider on a horse. Comment 4: - Date Received: 29th May 2021 - Method of Receipt: Forwarded b Brandon Djordjevich via email - Public Member's Name: Freedom of Information _Protection of Privacy Act Section 22(1) (Severed portions are shaded) Key Points: 1. The immediate area is currently used for the purpose of farming and is home to various animals such as horses, chickens, pigs, ducks, etc. The noises generated by the paintball operation could be disturbing to the animals. 2. People ride their horses up and down 128 Ave and the sound of paintball gun shots could spook a horse, causing it to bolt. This could potentially injure or kill someone. 3. There are waterways that run through parts of the paintball operation and there's a chance that paintballs may enter these waterways. 4. The area is home to a range of flora and fauna and the paintball operation may affect that. 5. Traffic coming and going from the location could increase, which could be unpleasurable to local residents. 6. Garbage along 128 Ave could increase because of the increased traffic to the area. 7. There have been alleged threats about the public member's home being "paintballed" if the application Is rejected. 8. The paintball operation would be using air horns and loud explosive grenades. 9. The paintball operation is unsafe and encourages players to shoot people on the streets. Key Responses 1. The centre is positioned 100m+ from 128 Ave and 60m+ from the closest neighbouring boundary to the west. There's dense secondary and tertiary growth forest between the operational areas of the paintball centre and any neighbouring property which will act as a further physical, visual and acoustic barrier. Paintball guns work off compressed air and therefore let off a dull popping sound rather than a loud explosion sound like normal guns do. Likewise, the guns used at this centre fire smaller projectiles and therefore are even quieter than normal paintball guns and travel a shorter distance. The noise generated by the paintball operation will be less than the existing ambient noise in the area from existing traffic and existing operations. 2. Previous acoustic reports conducted by Delta Force Paintball, along with their experience at other locations that operate adjacent to horse stables and ranches, indicate that the noise generated by the paintball operation will not scare any horses and/or spook them in any way. Likewise due to the large buffer the noise cannot travel that far so as to disturb animals and/or residents. 3. An Environment Management Plan has been created by an external QEP to ensure there are appropriate steps in place to mitigate any risk to the environment, to local flora/fauna, to the waterways, etc. Steps include operating outside of the 30m exclusion zone from any watercourse (50m+ in most instances), rotating operational game zones to allow for revegetation, installing physical boundaries to stop players from entering restricted areas, waste management plans, etc. 4. Traffic in the area will increase, but not to a level that would surpass the capabilities of the existing road infrastructure. Delta Force Paintball is busiest when the industrial park up the road is quietest, so the additional traffic brought to the area wouldn't be greater than the traffic along 128 Ave on each day mid -week. S. There's nothing to suggest that paintball players generate more or less litter than the current levels, however Delta Force Paintball has processes to ensure a clean and tidy working environment. This includes the entry to the centre and all surrounding areas. Part of the submitted EMP includes a waste management plan to ensure all waste is collected, secured and removed from site as required. 6. Delta Force Paintball firmly oppose any unneighbourly behaviour such as suggesting someone's house will be vandalised if an application for paintball is rejected. The business has no knowledge of the origin of such comments and it thinks there's no place for such behaviour in this world. 7. The paintball operation does not use air horns, whistles or other such amplifying devices. Likewise, the only pyrotechnics used on site are smoke grenades which is a silent device that releases a plume of coloured smoke for around 30 seconds before dissipating. 8. Delta Force Paintball operational procedures and marketing material promotes the safe enjoyment of an outdoor adventure activity. There's no marketing material that promotes people shooting members of the public or playing paintball outside of a controlled environment. Any suggestion otherwise is intentionally inaccurate. Comment Z) Date Received: 291" May 2021 - Method of Receipt: Forwarded by Brandon Djordjevich via email Public Member's Name: Name removed by Brandon Djordjevich at the request of the individual Key Points: 1. The additional noise — and the foreign/startling nature of that noise — could scare the horses in the area. 2. Horses may startle when cars/trucks pass them whilst being ridden down the train road. 3. Is there a more suitable location for paintball on the block closer to the gravel pit? Key Responses 1. The centre is positioned 100m+ from 128 Ave and 60m+ from the closest neighbouring boundary to the west. There's dense secondary and tertiary growth forest between the operational areas of the paintball centre and any neighbouring property which will act as a further physical, visual and acoustic barrier. 2. The paintball operation will bring personal vehicle traffic to the area rather than significant truck traffic as is currently generated by the recently developed industrial park up the road. The traffic generated by paintball will be far less than the current level of traffic, and there's nothing to suggest that paintball patrons are more or less inclined to follow the road rules and corresponding speed limits. 3. The portion of the property to the immediate north of the paintball area (i.e. the middle section of the property) is to be maintained for future filming projects as it has been used for in recent years. This is incline with the industrial zoning that the property holds. Likewise, the top portion of the block is to remain an active gravel mine, again remaining incline with the current use and zoning. The gravel will be used for part of the paintball operation as well. Comment 6: - Date Received: 11th August 2021 Method of Receipt: Forwarded by Brandon Djordjevich via email Public Member's Name: Name removed by Brandon Djordjevich at the request of the individual - Key Points: 1. The additional noise and the foreign/startling nature of that noise could scare livestock in the area. 2. There's spring water that runs through the neighbouring property, which may be fed by the streams on the proposed location. The paintball operation could pollute this water. Key Responses , 1. The centre is positioned 100m+from 128 Ave and 60m+from the closest neighbouring boundary to the west. There's dense secondary and tertiary growth forest between the operational areas of the paintball centre and any neighbouring property which will act as a further physical, visual and acoustic barrier. The noise generated by a paintball gun from 50m is less than the minimum ambient noise level. The paintball centre will utilise quieter guns to avoid any disturbance. 2. An Environment Management Plan has been created by an external QEP to ensure there are appropriate steps in place to mitigate any risk to the environment, to local flora/fauna, to the waterways, etc. Steps include operating outside of the 30m exclusion zone from any watercourse (50m+ in most instances), rotating operational game zones to allow for revegetation, installing physical boundaries to stop players from entering restricted areas, utilising waste management plans, etc. The QEP determined that, based on the functional range of a paintball gun and the location of the waterways, the paintball operation would have no impact on the watercourses. Comment 7: - Date Received: 11`h August 2021 - Method of Receipt: Forwarded by Brandon Djordjevich via email - Public Member's Name: Name removed by Brandon Djordjevich at the request of the individual Key Points: 1. Traffic could increase because of the paintball operation. Lots of vehicles speed along 128 Ave and this can cause horses to spook, throwing their riders off. 2. The additional noise and the foreign/startling nature of that noise could scare Livestock in the area. Key Responses: 1. The paintball operation will bring personal vehicle traffic to the area rather than significant truck traffic as is currently generated by the recently developed industrial park up the road. The traffic generated by paintball will be far less than the current level of traffic, and there's nothing to suggest that paintball patrons are more or less inclined to follow the road rules and corresponding speed limits. A truck passing a rider on a horse is far more likely to spook the horse than a personal vehicle passing a rider on a horse. 3. The centre is positioned 100m+ from 128 Ave and 60m+ from the closest neighbouring boundary to the west. There's dense secondary and tertiary growth forest between the operational areas of the paintball centre and any neighbouring property which will act as a further physical, visual and acoustic barrier. The noise generated by a paintball gun from SOm is less than the minimum ambient noise level. The paintball centre will utilise quieter guns to avoid any disturbance. Comment S: Date Received: 11`h August 2021 - Method of Receipt: Forwarded by Brandon Djordjevich via email Public Member's Name: Name removed by Brandon Djordjevich at the request of the individual Key Points: 1. The immediate area is currently used for the purpose of farming and is home to various animals. The noises generated by the paintball operation could be disturbing to the animals. 2. Traffic could increase because of the paintball operation and the existing infrastructure is not sufficient for the current amount of traffic. 3. Traffic in the area could pose a risk to residents and horse riders walking down the side of the road. 4. The paintball operation could result in an increase in traffic, pollution, garbage, noise, risk to residents and risk to farm animals/wildlife. I<ey Responses: 1. The centre is positioned 100m+from 128 Ave and 60m+from the closest neighbouring boundary to the west. There's dense secondary and tertiary growth forest between the operational areas of the paintball centre and any neighbouring property which will act as a further physical, visual and acoustic barrier. The noise generated by a paintball gun from SOm is less than the minimum ambient noise level. The paintball centre will utilise quieter guns to avoid any disturbance. 2. The paintball operation will bring personal vehicle traffic to the area rather than significant truck traffic as is currently generated by the recently developed industrial park up the road. The traffic generated by paintball will be far less than the current level of traffic, and there's nothing to suggest that paintball patrons are more or less inclined to follow the road rules and corresponding speed limits. A truck passing a rider on a horse is far more likely to spook the horse than a personal vehicle passing a rider on a horse. Additional traffic will be generated on weekends when the industrial park up the road is quiet. 3. Delta Force Paintball is committed to maintaining a clean environment, including the entire street frontage. Comment 9: - Date Received: 11`h August 2021 Method -of Receipt: Forwarded by Brandon Djordjevich via email Public Member's Name: Name removed by Brandon Djordjevich at the request of the individual - Key Points: 1. Traffic coming and going from the location could increase, which could be unpleasurable to local residents. 2. The paintball operation could create noise all day long. 3. The immediate area is currently used for the purpose of farming and is home to various animals I ncluding up to 52 varieties of birds. The noises generated by the paintball operation could be disturbing to the animals. 4. There are signs posted i:n the area alerting residents to certain areas having "Sensitive fish and wildlife habitat beyond this point". There's a creek that runs alongside the paintball area that flows into a fish hatchery. - Key Responses: 1. The paintball operation will bring personal vehicle traffic to the area rather than significant truck traffic as is currently generated by the recently developed industrial park up the road. The traffic generated by paintball will be far less than the current level of traffic. Additional traffic will be generated on weekends when the industrial park up the road is quiet. 2. The centre is positioned 100m+ from 128 Ave and 60m+ from the closest neighbouring boundary to the west. There's dense secondary and tertiary growth forest between the operational areas of the paintball centre and any neighbouring property which will act as a further physical, visual and acoustic barrier. The noise generated by a paintball gun from 50m is less than the minimum ambient noise level. The paintball centre will utilise quieter guns to avoid any disturbance. 3. Previous acoustic reports conducted by Delta Force Paintball, along with their experience at other locations that operate adjacent to horse stables, ranches and farms, indicate that the noise generated by the paintball operation will not scare any livestock and/or spook them in any way. Likewise due to the large buffer the noise cannot travel that far so as to disturb animals and/or residents. Delta Force Paintball engaged the services of an external QEP to develop an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the proposed location. Part of the EMP identified all of the wildlife in the area, and it documented how the paintball centre must operate in order to minimise or completely avoid any harmful impact on these animals. This includes but it not limited to operating with exclusion zones around any nesting areas for all relevant birds so that the noise generated by the paintball operation does not have any adverse effect on them. The Environmental Assessment conducted by the QEP suggested that no land -clearing take place between March 1- August 31 in order to avoid any undue impact to nesting birds. Delta Force Paintball has confirmed that they will adhere to this recommendation. 4. Delta Force Paintball engaged the services of an external QEP to conduct an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed location. Part of the EA identified and plotted the various watercourses throughout the property to ensure that the paintball operation adheres to a minimum exclusion zone of 30m from any watercourse. The EA identified that no watercourse would be impacted by the paintball operation, and it concluded that no protective fencing is required beyond the introduction of a double strand rope boundary line around the perimeter of all playing areas. Comment 9: - Date Received: 11th August 2021 - Method of Receipt: Forwarded by Brandon Djordjevich via email - Public Member's Name: Name removed by Brandon Djordjevich at the request of the individual Key Points: 1. What evidence is there to support the suggestion that animals won't be disturbed by the sound produced by the paintball operation? 2. What evidence is there to support the suggestion that paintballs won't hurt the creeks? 3. What reports exist for the wildlife in the area? 4. What assessment has been done on the proposed activity? Responses; 1. Delta Force Paintball engaged the services of an external QEP to develop an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the proposed location, Part of the EMP identified all of the wildlife in the area, and it documented how the paintball centre must operate in order to minimise or completely avoid any harmful impact on these animals. This includes but is not limited to operating with exclusion zones around any nesting areas for all relevant birds so that the noise generated by the paintball operation does not have any adverse effect on them. The Environmental Assessment conducted by the QEP suggested that no land -clearing take place between March 1— August 31 in order to avoid any undue impact to nesting birds. Delta Force Paintball has confirmed that they will adhere to this recommendation. The EMP indicated that birds are likely to find suitable nesting areas adjacent to the operational areas. 2. Delta Force Paintball engaged the services of an external QEP to conduct an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed location. Part of the EA identified and plotted the various wafiercourses throughout the property to ensure that the paintball operation adheres to a minimum exclusion zone of 30m from any watercourse. The EA identified that no watercourse would be impacted by the paintball operation, and it concluded that no protective fencing is required beyond the introduction of a double strand rope boundary line around the perimeter of all playing areas. The QEP also review the Material Safety Data Sheet for the paintbalis to confirm that they are non -toxic 3. Delta Force Paintball engaged the services of an external QEP to conduct an Environmental Assessment (EA) and to develop an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the proposed location. These documents, along with various application forms for watercourse protection to the City of Maple Ridge and this current review process, form part of the assessment of the proposed activity to make sure it is suitable. MAP LE British Columbia mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7819-2021 12954 Mill Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022 FILE NO: 2021-470-RZ MEETING: C o W An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 12954 Mill Street from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) and RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) and R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential), to permit a future subdivision of approximately seven lots. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined in section d) Planning Analysis. As per Council Policy 6.31, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program. The CAC rates in Policy 6.31 are currently under review, and if approved at an upcoming Council meeting, it is anticipated that this application will be subject to new rates. The expected CAC contribution rate for this rezoning application will be confirmed in the second reading report. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7819-2021 be given first reading; and further. 2. That the applicant provides further information as described on Schedules B, E, F, G, and J of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Don Bowins Legal Description: Lot 2 Section 27 Township 12 New Westminster Plan 11128 OCP: Existing: Conservation, Medium Density Residential, Low Density Urban Proposed: Conservation, Medium Density Residential, Low Density Urban Within Urban Area Boundary: Yes Area Plan: Silver Valley Area Plan OCP Major Corridor: No 1104 2021-470-RZ Page 1 of 5 Existing: RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential), and RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) Proposed: R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential), and 13-1(Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) Surrounding Uses: North*: Use: Park, Singe Detached Residential. Zone. N/A Designation: Conservation South: Use: Recently rezoned and built Single Detached Residential lots Zone. R-1 and R-2 Designation: Medium Density Residential East: Use: One Single Detached Residential lot Zone: RS-3 Designation: Civic, Conservation West*: Use: City right of way, and one Single Detached Residential lot on the other side of the right of way. Zone: RS-2 Designation: Conservation, Low Density Urban, and Medium Density Residential *The subject site is on the corner of 130 Avenue (to the North) and 240 Street (to the West) which are City right of ways. These right of ways are currently forested but may undergo road construction in the future. Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: ingle Residential SDetached Single Detached Residential 0.92 ha (2.26 acres) Mill Street and 129A Avenue Urban Standard The subject site is primarily defined by two fish -bearing creeks, Millionaire Creek and Cordin Creek, that run along the northern and western parts of the property. There is a human made pond that connects with the two watercourses. There is a setback requirement, measured from Top of Bank, for the watercourses, and the total setback area will be groundtruthed at a later date with the City's Environment Section and the applicant's environmental professional. The environmentally sensitive area is located in the northwest of the subject property and the development is proposed for the southeastern portion of the subject property. The developable area flanks Mill Street to the east and 129A Avenue to the south; the latter being recently created during the rezoning and subdivision of 12874 Mill Street to the south to allow access for new lots along 240A Street. 2021-470-RZ Page 2 of 5 c) Project Description. The applicant proposes to subdivide 12954 MITI Street to allow for five R-1 lots (minimum 371III 2) and two R-2 lots (minimum 315m2). Two R-1 lots are proposed to front Mill Street while the other five lots are proposed to front 129A Street (see Appendices A and B). At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and further reports will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and could likely change once the servicing details and analysis reports are reviewed. Any layout must ultimately be approved by the Approving Officer. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP). A minor OCP amendment will likely be required for a conservation area boundary adjustment once the above -noted groundtruthing is completed. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) and RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) and 13-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) (see Appendix C) to permit five (5) R-1 lots and two (2) R-2 lots (see Appendix D). The minimum lot size for the proposed 0-1 and 0-2 zones are 370m2 and 315m2 respectively. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. This would apply to two of the proposed R-1 zoned lots, wherein a 1m reduction in lot width is being requested to enable two 10m wide lots instead of the required 11m. These two proposed lots are dependent on setback requirements for the environmentally sensitive areas and the resulting lot yield will be calculated before second reading. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top of bank of all watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian Top of Bank and/or high watermark assessment by a qualified environmental professional and a survey of those features would be required to establish the protected watercourse setbacks for Millionaire Creek and Cordin Creek. 2021-470-RZ Page 3 of 5 The subject property is located within the Wildfire Development Permit Area, identified on Map 1 in Section 8.12 of the Official Community Plan. Pursuant to Section 8.12 of the OCP, a Wildfire Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity identified in wildfire risk areas. The purpose of the Wildfire Development Permit is for the protection of life and property in designated areas that could be at risk for wildland fire; and where this risk may be reasonably abated through implementation of appropriate precautionary measures. Prior to second reading a Registered Professional Forester's Report will be required to determine wildfire mitigation requirements. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. e) Interdepartmentallmplications: In order to advance the current application after first reading, comments and input will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below. a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Environmental Planning Section; f) Community Planning Section; g) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department; h) School District, i) Utility companies; j) Fisheries & Oceans Canada; k) Ministry of Environment; and I) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing and site access requirements have not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed, the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); 2. A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); 3. A Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); 4. A Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G), 5. A Wildfire Development Permit Application (Schedule J); and 6. A Subdivision Application. 2021-470-RZ Page 4 of 5 The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. "Original signed by Brandon Djordjevich" Prepared by: Brandon Djordjevich, M.PL Planning Technician "Original signed by Lisa Zosiak" for Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Charles Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B - Ortho Map Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7819-2021 Appendix D - Proposed Site Plan 2021-470-RZ Page 5 of 5 I 13088 13078 m 13068 0) 13067 CO N 13061 13091 13080 13081 ~ 13072 13071 N O N 13062 LO ti rn co m m rn rn rn m co N N N N N 130A AVE 13053 13045 � m 13040 13037 M N 13029 13021 13013 fl00 13009 55 130 AVE 13000 O h I � N N N � � 1 O N rn tti M N N ah° c�F �91° ti3 s ti Legend 13000 13056 13050 i SUBJECT PROPERTY r 12974 12929 � 12923 B O qqzr 12919 N 12913 il�Z:x>ki Strea m Ditch Centreline a Indefinite Creek 12930 12931 12924 12925 12916 12917 12908 12909 12900 12901 �2a 12893 � 92 J 12885 J co N C to 00 m G co to a �P N 13000 • 12954 MILL ST P I D 005-825-385 PLANNING DEPARTMENT British Columbia mapleridge.ca Scale: 1:2,500 Lake or Reservoir FILE: 2021-470-RZ/SD DATE: Dec 30, 2021 BY: AH 12954 MILL ST PID 005-825-385PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia mapleridge.ca Scale: 1:2,500I �� ��I FILE: 2021-470-RZ/SD \+ DATE: Dec 30, 2021 BY: AH CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7819-2021 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" Zoning Bylaw Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended, NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7819-2021." 2. That parcel of land and premises known and described as: Lot 2 Section 27 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 11128 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1943 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to 13-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) and 13-1(Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the READ a second time the PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the ADOPTED, the day of day of day of day of 20 20 20 20 20 CORPORATE OFFICER 11 13067 10 13061 :P 42361 9 13053 Park 4 CNM 8 13045 N 7 13037 m 6 13029 5 13021 cp 4 13013 ,� 2 13009 ^p���^� 3 Q o6 oNi (�j 13005 G Q N 3 ��G in1 1 3\ n m 13068 13071 a N BCC' 1N 141 uo 2m34COCO CO C�j 13040 130A AVE. PARK EPP 30980 a o — o/ / rn 160 N N/ EPP>2 3870 CO N A EP 59987 25 B 4 5 EPP 6869 EPFi 26868 P1 ��9^h P 63118 45 xe�\eev4z;e /CX)\/ 9^� 47 118 3 (< 13062 CO 4 13056 L U _ 5 / 13050 Park BCP 36962 12954 z4 129391 � 2312933 SEP 72930 22 12929 9 M212923 LO 12924 Nr �0 1g m¢ 129116 W f291 N 11 1 8� 12901 12908 117 12 99 12900 128 EPF 713 ti �N �o�o N NII�' 16 00 A14 w PARK EPP 66380 PP 8451 �� P 2622 / A cc kn l� BCP 36495 / 12 CO to I o / RW 58430 130 AVE. 12974 P 2622 gGF 2542� _ _ I 22 21 CP � 511 12931 � 6 / 12925 / S 5 `vim 12917 / Q 4 / � 12909 / 3 / 12901 / 12893 _12885 PP 8373 J P Bylaw No. 7819-2021 Map No. 1943 From: RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) To: 0 R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) ® R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) N SCALE 1:21500 APPENDIX D Nbs f 00e 1� � 1 Aq)* �y0 "phi MENEM Y Q S �8 ag E o C) �C� O �D LJO +� ys X ¢ w —� x Nw m� X0� U (1 x fs tix E E cc go cc a n E E E egoo� a e 3R C fL CJ i n`F i 31F1lE � f m9 m $ H E¢�ae oa Ci Eo oo'BFrve�OR 417E m> o' 00000000000 `0 rg$££ 0 ggg$g $g$g gg$gg$gg$gg$gR$ i38 $tlF388 a a o 0 -Oxmg�M E a aoao==�ana E000 g � E�j�R��oiriry E E pc Rock Rel. a n uan b y) of l er Mark i1 43 W x h n low wo / r �' o � o ®Jrni 16 0% tvoLn n ® F xF 00 st 00'<[ 001� os �� N X d 0 � r AD � h�O n I 00 N04 �E d �o CNco EMS ■imlii■■1 EE 06 X----21.30 f�. � I E Flo R3n3Rn�m I ^ oQ000e00000 0 888 a sso�ss�Fm � 77a qAn �n� 0 o �gx��Rgs 4 �7 r — -- _ X iX 21.30 m X 3 ]AV d6zL I Y9T m oN I X X X I 041 Nti I� 4'115 w0£'S Z d zB o �NI �d 4gI u CO E-tinn< ub L L S 5 n n a n`mSgXniZ9 e R n O E E � E E U :eo : f -o ------ --- `o os< < 'f CI 2 Q�5 Um �vi 04 Q F od rn H Ow0 o mmw 4 � n � �EEs� 2 <?Qry to � o m W23y mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: January 18, 2022 2021-514-RZ Cow SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7820-2021 11204, 11208, 11214 Charlton Street and 20318 Lorne Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject properties, located at 11204, 11208, 11214 Charlton Street and 20318 Lorne Avenue, from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential), to permit the future construction of approximately 16 townhouse units. To proceed further with this application additional information is required, as outlined below. As per Council Policy 6.31, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program. The CAC rates in Policy 6.31 area currently under review and if approved at an upcoming Council meeting, it is anticipated that this application would be subject to the new rates. The expected CAC contribution rate for this rezoning will be confirmed in the second reading report. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7820-2021 be given first reading; and further 2. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules D and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: David Eaton Architect Inc. Legal Descriptions: Lot 1 District Lot 279 New Westminster Plan 71207 Lot 2 District Lot 279 New Westminster Plan 71207 Lot 333 District Lot 279 New Westminster Plan 114 Lot 334 District Lot 279 New Westminster Plan 114 • • Existing: Proposed: Within Urban Area Boundary: Area Plan: OCP Major Corridor: Low Density Multi -Family Low Density Multi -Family Yes Hammond Area Plan Yes 2021-514-RZ Page 1 of 5 Zoning: Existing: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Proposed: RM-1(Low Density Townhouse Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single -Family Residential Zone: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Designation: Low Density Multi -Family South: Use: Single -Family Residential Zone. RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Designation: Low Density Multi -Family and Single Family & Compact Residential East: Use: Single -Family Residential Zone. RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Designation: Low Density Multi -Family West: Use: Single -Family Residential Zone. RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Designation: Parks & Open Space Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property. Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement. b) Site Characteristics: Single -Family Residential Multi -Family Residential 0.27 ha (0.66 acres) Hampton Street Urban Standard The subject properties have a combined total area of 0.27 ha (0.66 acres) and are bounded by Lorne Avenue to the north, Hampton Avenue to the south, Charlton Street to the west and single- family housing to the east (see Appendices A and B). Tolmie Park is located across the Charlton Street from the subject properties. Each of the subject properties have a residential single-family dwelling which will be demolished as a condition of final reading. Trees and other vegetation are located along the periphery of the properties and the subject properties are relatively flat. c) Project Description: The current application is proposing to rezone the subject properties to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) to permit the construction of approximately 16 townhouse units (Appendix D), the units are configured in four buildings each containing four units (Appendices D and E). The access to the development will be from Hampton Street which will also require the completion of the existing road. Additionally, residential parking for each unit is provided in a concealed garage with a side by side configuration. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and further reports will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot 2021-514-RZ Page 2 of 5 boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject properties are located within the Lower Hammond Precinct of the Hammond Area Plan and are designated Low Density Multi -Family. This designation serves as a transitional development form and density between Single -Family & Compact Residential and the Medium Density Multi - Family designations and includes townhouse, courtyard and fourplex forms. The Low Density Multi - Family designation supports the proposed townhousing under the RWI (Low Density Townhouse Residential) zone. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RW1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) to permit the constructions of aproximately 16 townhouse units. The 0.27 ha (0.66 acre) site area exceeds the minimum 0.10 ha. (0.25 acre) area in the RW1 zone. The initial plans indicate proposed variances from the required 7.5m front, rear and exterior side yard setbacks ranging from 5.85m to 7.0m. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.13 of the OCP, a Hammond Development Permit Application is required for all proposals designated as Low Density Multi -Family and to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the OCP, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for: • All areas designated Conservation on Schedule "B" or all areas within 50 metres of an area designated Conservation on Schedule "B", or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver Valley Area Plan; • All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 %; • All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural Features Schedule "C" to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions. Advisory Design Panel: A Hammond Area Development Permit is required and the associated plans must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second reading. 2021-514-RZ Page 3 of 5 Development Information IVleeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. e) Interdepartmentallmplications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below. a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department; f) School District; and g) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing and site access requirements have not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed, the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended: 1. A Hammond Area Development Permit Application (Schedule D); and 2. A Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G); The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading, subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. 2021-514-RZ Page 4 of 5 "Original signed by Mark McMullen" for Prepared by: April Crockett Planning Technician 'Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning 'Original signed by Charles Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services 'Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B - Ortho Map Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7820-2021 Appendix D - Proposed Site Plan Appendix E -Project Renderings 2021-514-RZ Page 5 of 5 QpG�E ADO) A oa c wo ao a ' 0 ass ao aoa> o a a 0 oa a � a � mass G�� aoa oaso 05e�L\ aoas rn ��3p1 r'o ao aoaw 0> ef�N w n a s oa ao V- a so mow V ,10 1�p11 ��X \ /10 n� ao w C•( a0 n 11204/08/14 CHARLTON ST & 20318 LORNE AVE PID'S 003-608-697, 003-608-6891 011-511-0791 003-859-401 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia mapleridge.ca �-� �' FILE: 2021-514-RZ/DP DATE: Oct 21, 2021 F- U) LO O N BY: PC ��P DI, 11204/08/14 CHARLTON ST & 20318 LORNE AVE PID'S 003-608-697, 003-608-689, 011-511-079, 003-859-401 i PLANNING DEPARTMENT � � � � � , mapleridge.ca Scale: 1:2,500I �� � �� FILE:2021-514-RZ�DP DATE: Oct 21, 2021 BY: PC CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.7820-2021 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" Zoning Bylaw Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7820-2021." 2. Those parcels of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 District Lot 279 New Westminster Plan 71207; Lot 2 District Lot 279 New Westminster Plan 71207; Lot 333 District Lot 279 New Westminster Plan 114; and Lot 334 District Lot 279 New Westminster Plan 114 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1944 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to KM-1(Low Density Townhouse Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , 20 READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of 20 CORPORATE OFFICER 574 / ' <Ai3`�,aoass � - o� io it 0 % S6, ao cP6, yq. `'oa 400 °� 13 a >>\ Zh p�573 � G �v O m �> \ o tS` \ 9 / aoa`€y p�0 O� O QO> \` \� �o a�> c`O�`s pQ��� \ \ ��. ^ �1t�5` a a,\ QO oaa or, y7> ��` sT6' ao� � S� La �L0 ohs �pao� ao NO CP ao � ao jr� \ S ` ti` � `� d) , 112 >� oa i'_� �aoADO O \� ��p �tSj y(FT 7� eao A O0 S / ' �' ��Dk ,� 6' p cP �0 0 ao O > `v -per sr a uZVI �6, o 0 � ? h9 a a61 a R Q o �!Q ��o PP VP dip \ `'o `'o Q a \ asp a�a �Oi3` \ 0,9 o0 / \` OHO ��2� s r' , �2h� CR d > ,% 1 /� \ j Q L ` G 6+�5` ao� / A ao �PSS` \ ; Q� - r - c` (114) /' < �s,Oj a" va \" \\ 0 000 11,�A1 239 % \9,\��Cp 11�3 Qr�aoa Ooas / /'\\ \ "�� Q� i' �y9 112 6 i v, IPA .0 O p ?O N'� 1 ,c\ 0a0a \0oPARK �,r / aO Pd A . ST��oaa ' PZ RP 55932 \ v� sip \ Oust\ OO�a0 1� oa'a` 11, Z,5 / / '/ / \ C' 111�ti 3 V. ao a u' a / dQj d` tp vpF��P / a�aao O a�a Q ao ao� �� o O a �o i, ,A ad .�� �` NIP oa' t�d� Q �0 c0. `��d,�i9 � 11h8 a s � tP LP NO I& Q aoa yC• aoa' hh �' a �pa �0 O�6� ao�/aoa r' ,��1 0� �� '3 or, ao �90 N goo o� \ 06+Oao�� O i°`r >>\n� .��'oag 7 Q $� Q ��1A3 21 110g6 70 \ ,Oct 1�6 2 Nc` / ao \ $ Q lJ a !G \ t9 _ \Lo MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 7820-2021 Map No. 1944 From: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) To: RM-1(Low Density Townhouse Residential) MAPLEN SCALE 1620500 IIIJNI II D I � D -RHO g�° �s il9 ? � e O — 2�a23'siE Z 8 �nlie [wo C91 E E E a �sssasz� y 8 s 2 g 3 R 4 9 sCA CA1 �CA— IrxpPARUN Ira IVII. lwwd [wEz9l ' [ a a a O r I ; I 0 [ C7 a I i m i >w Qr I L�� I I I I [ CL EI y N_ i I 0 I ! a Am0. OuA z— D� 1 w H z a� I w i am A wU. a, ra I • I I [wLL'Ll �z _ I I'd x3 NOLLVOlO30 WIN l°d M31f Q 1 lL I N ul FZ o NW aw ? ®� Z �g pNag pp 04. ivb i cR 6 CL !" w oszufA AN w o t U o O F O $� cc > > '= m z NairE g z g a,'-.U�m oil er An m< rn ¢ IWSB'Sl �z-st i w jj 11YY �a o l F W n �� mLb 2 (L 0 W ~ LL z D� Z O 5 _ m - C= mg w �a� rLL I a 9� I j w2 LU L Iz i '� i a 'LIJ o t(L °P i z w W AD wo OI -i- --;ol � i I li i \I a I i I . I 1 I� 1 . 1 AN 17 i 0� i I -� D� 7 I i --.- _ - -- \ K _ 1 Y Pw i 0¢ I t Om FCm EW -- _ / N [w8t'EZ1 --- - 0 0 IgL o I m '_.—..—.--..—�.—.3NI1 A1213dMId ci NOV213S / I NSV913S i [wot091 [wLL LI / } lwezogl [wLL'L1 t [ws84s1 q�(o,oz .9-sz/ .o,Lz �� - [wEL'SEI i 1W99'01 _ DnN3AV DNv 101 o Q�°�h��9���� C I 2Byyyyy�yyyc��S Zt, � ��e �2 A��t OQ _ �l2� �ddpa��� Q,t F� d�L2�2�$ t�. ��� 11`, `ti . ,,i \. b S c g c g 9 Y g 3 E E o E E� a F, > ci ti u c3 c4 T s d � � � � � 3 � o u' a rc� Q� n m ¢ � � 4� 4�� 4 0 � - N t� �� � 1 '..,:'!f l (J (n w~ ^� s= � w "5 ?W ,pNJg 4 �� Z Oa H<dQ o0 oR s� � �� N«� W w mZwp � O�j �^OQv Z F O a��wN - W "NaaE n & m � a a.`.t=i�m ci3 u� N � _ _ �r .-_--� __ _' 1 - - --- �-- ,, __ L '� � --_ �- __= I] �yt q' C 1 _\. � �: �� !; I L i z g y < N M M 1 W U W d W d �zoz �z,a,�"�o BritishGE A' 1 � mm_ apleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7816-2021 11410 207 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022 FILE NO: 2021-530-RZ MEETING: C o W An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 11410 207 Street from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RT-2 (Ground -Oriented Residential Infill), to permit the future construction of a Fourplex. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined in section d) Planning Analysis. As per Council Policy 6.31, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program. The CAC rates in Policy 6.31 are currently under review, and if approved at an upcoming Council meeting, it is anticipated that this application will be subject to new rates. The expected CAC contribution rate for this rezoning application will be confirmed in the second reading report. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7816-2021 be given first reading; and further 2. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C and D of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Tarek El-Amoury Legal Description: Lot 1 District Lot 277 New Westminster Plan 80557 OCP: Existing: Low Density Multi -Family Proposed: Low Density Multi -Family Within Urban Area Boundary: Yes Area Plan: Hammond Area Plan OCP Major Corridor: Yes Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Proposed: RT-2 (Ground -Oriented Residential Infill) 1106 2021-530-RZ Page 1 of 4 Surrounding Uses. North, South, and East: West: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Use: Single Detached Residential Zone: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Designation: Low Density Multi -Family Use: Single Detached Residential Zone: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Designation: Single -Family & Compact Residential Single -Detached Residential Ground -Oriented Residential Infill (Fourplex) 928m2 (0.23 acres) 1 L4 Avenue (south) and lane (north). Each of the two accesses will serve two residential units and four parking spaces. Urban Standard The subject lot currently contains asingle-detached house on a 928m2 lot. The lot is separated from neighbouring lots by 114 Avenue to the south, 207 Street to the west, and a lane to the north (see Appendices A and B). There are approximately six mature trees along the lane to the north, most of which would be on City property when the lane dedication is taken. Most of the trees are currently planned to be retained and more information will be provided for second reading once a referral is made to the City Is Environment section. The fourplex rezoning application is within the Hammond Area Plan and will have to reflect the unique qualities of the area and heritage character through the Development Permit Guidelines for the Hammond Development Permit Area as well as the form and character standards within the Ground Oriented Development Permit Guidelines. There are no registered or listed heritage buildings on or adjacent to the subject site. c) Project Description: The rezoning application is for a RT-2 Fourplex (see Appendix C). The proposed fourplex would front 114 Avenue. However, the proposal takes advantage of the 36.9m (121ft) width of 207 Street with the four units facing 207 Street in one row. This 207 Street building face will provide the main pedestrian access and most prominent design of the four elevations. The fourplex is proposed to have two accesses, one from the northern lane and one from 114 Avenue to the south (see Appendix D). This dual access, each serving four garage parking spaces, results in less paving, better permeability, and a better site plan providing more living space. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and further reports will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. 2021-530-R7 Page 2 of 4 d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is located within the Hammond Area Plan and is currently designated Low Density Multi -Family which supports the RT-2 zone and proposed fourplex. The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 11410 207 Street from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RT-2 (Ground -Oriented Residential Infill) (see Appendix C) to permit the construction of a fourplex (see Appendix D). The minimum lot size for the current RS-1 zone is 668m2 and the minimum lot size for the proposed RT-2 zone is 850m2. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. The proposal meets the required eight (8) parking spaces which are to be provided in a side -by -side configuration. Development Permits: Pursuant to section 8.2 of the OCP: • Subsection 8: A Hammond Development Permit Area application is required for lands designated for a Low Density MultkFamily use; • Subsection 9: A Ground -Oriented Residential Infill Development Permit is required for a fourplex development application. Advisory Design Panel: A Hammond Area Plan Development Permit and Ground -Oriented Residential Infill Development Permit application is required to help guide form and character of the proposed development and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second reading. e) Interdepartmentallmplications: In order to advance the current application after first reading, comments and input will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Community Planning Section; f) Environmental Planning Section, g) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department; h) School District; and, i) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. 2021-530-RZ Page 3 of 4 This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time, therefore, an evaluation of servicing and site access requirements have not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed, the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended. 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); 2. A MultkFamily Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D); and 3. A Hammond Area Development Permit Application (Schedule D); The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. "Original signed by Brandon Djordjevich" for Prepared by: Brandon Djordjevich M.PL Planning Technician 'Original signed by Lisa Zosiak" for Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning 'Original signed by Charles Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" for Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B - Ortho Map Appendix C -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7816-2021 Appendix D - Proposed Site Plan 2021-530-RZ Page 4 of 4 APPEN DIX A 11534 11522 h to to h 1�. ? ^ ^ 11509 11512 ��25 ` (`I N N N 11499 11502 114 9 115 AVE Lo rn u� to N 11493 114 5 v on 11494 o 00 ^ 1�53Q5 11489 Q o 0 0 �16 11484 11485 N N N 11491 CD 11534 11485 CV 11489 11474 11475 11487 1508 � 11481 11464 11465 11470 p 11475 11454 11455 11460 11485 11450 11469 11444 11445 11483 11486 11440 N 11482 11465 11481 LI)o' o 0 0 1� h (7 �- b n M � M N NO N N � (o (o � 11460 o o o d ^ N N N N N N N O N CD N WESTFIELD AVE 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N r, h C ^ co (No � (gyp N N N N N 114 AVE ^ O N (o N (No O O O � N O o c' 1137fi /88 11352 /70 ^ O (`) N 11391 IN N N N N o (O O N � o N N 0 N 11339 11329 113 2 11311 Lo CV) � N N N N 11430 (o (o (o 11431 0 0 0 0 0 N N N 11417 ^n (o N 11407 0 o 0 O O O N N N o (n N <r O v O 11391 N N 11381 Lo to M o 00 0 0 0 0 11365 N N N (V 0 0 0 O N N N 11334 11329 11310 11315 o o o � CoCo 0 0 o 0 0 N N N N 113 AVE (o o v N N N 11295 11277 N Scale: 1:2,500 N N N 11291/93 11281 SUBJECT PROPERTY 11428 0 0 N 0 N N IN I(V IN I N N N M N N a <o Lo 0 ^O N N N N N N 11384 h N h Lo t\ a �... t\ N N N N N N O N o LORNE AVECo i1 O t\ 0 11312 11304 11296 11288 112 80 7 N O N N O N ■ 1 Lo 11410 207 STREET P I D 013-097-971 GOLF LANE PLANNING DEPARTMENT T mapleridge.ca FILE: 2021-530-RZ/DP DATE: Nov 3, 2021 BY: PC APPENDIX B ' ; _ - -soli '. <a �� � o �1j � � , a i 1494 � V1 •� � �". RON INN IN Y 1148Cv I MINI INNNI�Ir' �t �' '4 I 11474 '� 1 LR l p 11470<� �'1` 1 6 �r . I - AN jt, 4 Yl 4 IN _ ANE o IN- 1J482 INN IN o 1 11460 _ M 'IN v pp s WES ELD AVEMINION Ito T / _ �•, . �q i1 i 11 SUBJECT PROPERTY NO 1� ad It I. c L IN L Iik I p IN IN IN iNOR kAN }t > 41 1 j t 114 AVC NO ct (p N d N N Wit - CIS ire 8 if - IN LL NI 1T�5 x 1 f LA If 203M A I ONE t �� 1 - MIN p to IN U) IN CNN t s �. • r o LQ N 4 , O f — Ij um IN I CNN r,- _, �.: Ta }' 113 �ikt 113 - N . LL L IN NIN t 112 Scale: 1:2,500 MF I 304 I^ N E � .d .. e I f 112�8 u6W mu _ it ,` ,- t Irm, ', rNO ; �' ` �,p' y N Aerial Imagery from the Spnng''o:f r) > 11410 207 STREET I PID W M97-971 j PLANNING DEPARTMENT ON I Bit] mapleridge.ca FILE:2021-530-RZ/DP DATE: Nov 3, 2021 BY: PC CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 781&2021 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" Zoning Bylaw Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7816-2021." 2. That parcel and premises known and described as: Lot 1, D.L. 277, Plan NWP80557 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1940, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RT-2 (Ground -Oriented Residential Infill). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , 20 READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of 20 CORPORATE OFFICER 6 711445 c0 1cn 18 21 11469 11444 30 1483 11486 LMP 41821 11440 E_P 57771/erl_=----- ---- ----- °ry 11482 19 20 11465 �7 GOLF LAN 481 0 LMP 41822 0 ► P 77490 EP 60915 0 0 611 --- —----------- 606 Q 607 608 N a) 609 A,-+ 2 My z p L" ti c0 r. �N, ;: N o N 0 N 11460 co r� `� N 0" M • T- � N o C0 N oN F o W ^ mN g rn ��,< P 736,8 \ 2 3 4 - - - - — T ------- - - - - - ----- --- - -- EP 10944 CO 11430 � �� 11431 1 M r1429 P 114 RR Co o P70043 2 pia P60 14 i 623 620 619 , 616 615 612 RW 70942i 11428 L W 1 LANE --------- ------ 11410 - - - - - -- ---------- 621 N 61 617 11417 P 0557 P 10601 LM 23463 22 `'� 0846 114 1 2 17 18 19 1 2 * a (0 d. Lo 11407 N M rt LO (0o N N rU( N 847 NCL O '� � --------- -- - *PP044 114 AVE. - -- ----- 1391 (0 4rt A * N LO (000 92 C°o 11391 N N o o io 0 00 co 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 95 0 696 CD t` o_ B P 10601 I— 11381 11384 p P 114 LANE 94 697 ' 698 701 702 705 ---------- ------- - - - -�-- ---- P 10601 * P 10601 3 4 5 6 7 0 0 0 0 11365 N N N N O L L - ---------------------------------------------- M it P P 044 N N N � ----------- _- - -_ LORNE AVE. 339 W� � _ 0 R MAPLE Bylaw No. RIDGE ZONE AMENDING 781&2021 Map No. 1940 From: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) To: RT-2 (Ground Oriented Residential infill) MAPLERIDGEN L British ... SCALE 1:1,549 add 4 It IP sold PA y �r ,ad" ..,—ti ! . NEW u 1 Ills pad ask .7 i +sIs Fda r. addI,'wk c — .. t �. OF_ fi u 1 Ills pad ask .7 i +sIs Fda r. addI,'wk c — .. t �. OF_ fi CAW TY AMA ` Ea PH CA•� �P �� d3 a= - rggv ` o d gGma.e 5 uo 90 a® �CA eo =- At 61 Ve Jt7•UHW a¢ 6AAA Ujo z 0 E a q a U Co 0 0 v n AD m< n U U U 3 a vE, E E E of m a E N AN ,o N .0 IN a s a s s s s s a a a s s a ,- a s a0 AM a�NNri!nJZpgd- e` cl .i• LLi-nmEV - E c PAM a 0 Z wE c > a "oi > 0 0 > 0 E a >o< m o E E m o E u o E 2 b u E _ _ aE _6 0 ° ko o 0 =AM u 0Q wo a . r zo w u 40 ®x�✓ c.wanoomvw� cEm �S LOZ nEE r E E a rnEE taLnE�`�E3 9 s 1 �U N N m r � a N a x 0 o m E 3 m € t m m a a _ a 33 z c E 33 -mo On m a N m m rn O y a n n '> m 3? o> o,o a `ma e'm m u n «m O'O n� co W A. u, c mEo cmi" o N m 3 0 .n� m >.� $ o o� a=v >.� u o nv R m o a`rt= E Wm m� E am t� I u `w j � c 1 3 za ov lli�v o`a u'fm CA Ow gom ry 4 �y I --' -------- --- YvT� !• p 4 HMI I _AV € ?„ �i�� - I ,. ie ot is o o LLLJJJ ��i ••w rrr LLLJJJ - _ ! v _ r� \\ tt :1elt , 3•.;:.:;..:• 8: Ail 11A E 1��s It, ^ ¢ o�v �0. 3F_ mc� omcm ommcm rn=m mrn ,=m 7KNd r. 00 C^ a0NN O-m �u,�y O7 G m t m c W d s m A =cJ oiv moo may �mfv mmn�a n os Etm w E o 9 E!' o mmumiRo t y En b E —$ m 10 > u 9 3 3 m 3 m Im 0 N u O) Of m •C m O `1 O O C -E m m m R U av am moo_ ao b m Q U U to 0 o a o En a n` 7 a ` Q N e I � c O U c J MAPLE mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7817-2021 21211 Wicklund Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022 FILE NO: 2021-563-RZ MEETING: C o W An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 21211 Wicklund Avenue from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RT-1 (Two -Unit Urban Residential), to permit the future construction of a duplex. The application will require a Rezoning Text Amendment to the Zoning Bylaw to allow for a RT-1 (Two -Unit Urban Residential) to be under the 750m2 minimum lot area regulation. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below in section d) Planning Analysis. As per Council Policy 6.31, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program. The CAC rates in Policy 6.31 are currently under review and if approved at an upcoming Council meeting, it is anticipated that this application will be subject to new rates. The expected CAC contribution rate for this rezoning application will be confirmed in the second reading report. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7817-2021 be given first reading; and further 2. That the applicant provides further information as described on Schedule B of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Masood M. Naderi Legal Description: Lot 6, District Lot 242 New Westminster Plan 14112 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Proposed: Urban Residential Within Urban Area Boundary: Yes Area Plan: N/A OCP Major Corridor: No 1107 2021-563-RZ Page 1 of 4 Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North. RS-1(Single Detached Residential) RT-1(Two-Unit Urban Residential) Use: Duplex Residential Zone: RT-1(Two-Unit Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential South: Use: Single -Detached Residential and Place of Worship Zone: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) and P4 (Place of Worship) Designation: Urban Residential and Institutional East: Use: Single -Detached Residential Zone: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement. b) Site Characteristics: Single -Detached Residential and panhandle of Duplex Residential RS-1b (Single Detached (Medium Density) Residential), RT-1(Two-Unit Urban Residential) Urban Residential Single -Detached Residential Duplex Residential 847.5m2 (0.21 acres) Wicklund Avenue Urban Standard The subject site fronts Wicklund Avenue at the T-shape intersection with 212 Street (see Appendices A and B). The surrounding lots to the north of Wicklund Avenue and to the west of 212 Street are residential. To the east of 212 Street is St. Paul's Lutheran Church. The predominant zone in the vicinity is RS-1 (Single Detached Residential), however, there are three other RT-1 (Two Unit Urban Residential) zoned lots within 45m of the subject site. The subject site is 35m away from 21188 Wicklund Avenue, which has had third reading for a rezoning application to the R-1 Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential zone. c) Project Description: The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject site to RT-1 (Two -Unit Urban Residential) to permit a duplex (See Appendices A and B). As part of the rezoning process, 5.9m of road dedication will be taken to widen Wicklund Avenue, which will reduce the lot size from 847.5m2 to approximately 72805m2. This is less than the minimum required lot area of 750m2 for the RT-1 (Two -Unit Urban Residential) zone and thus the applicant is proposing a rezoning text amendment. At this time, the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and 2021-563-RZ Page 2 of 4 further reports will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The application is consistent with the Urban Residential designation in the Official Community Plan. The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RT-1 (Two -Unit Urban Residential) (see Appendix C) to permit a duplex (see Appendix )). The minimum lot size for the proposed RT-1 zone is 750m2. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. As part of the rezoning process, the Engineering Department requires 5.9m of road dedication from the subject site to widen Wicklund Avenue. The resulting dedication of approximately 119m2 would reduce the subject site from 847.5m2 to approximately 728.5m2. The minimum lot area permitted under the RT-1 Duplex zone is 750m2 and thus the applicant is proposing a rezoning text amendment to permit a reduction in the minimum lot area requirement. The Planning Department is supportive of the rezoning site specific text amendment due to the significant road dedication and because a similar site specific text amendment was approved for 21421 Wicklund Avenue which required the same significant road dedication. Development Permits: No Development Permits are required to accompany this application; however, a restrictive covenant for form and character for the duplex will be a condition of final reading. e) Interdepartmentallmplications: In order to advance the current application after first reading, comments and input will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department; f) Community Planning Section g) Environmental Planning Section, h) School District, i) Utility companies; j) Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; k) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. 2021-563-RZ Page 3 of 4 This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing and site access requirements have not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Early and Ongoing Consultation: In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an OCP amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. g) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. "Original signed by Brandon Djordjevich" Prepared by: Brandon Djordjevich, M.PL Planning Technician 'Original signed by Lisa Zosiak" for Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning 'Original signed by Charles Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, MYL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services 'Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B - Ortho Map Appendix C -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7817-2021 Appendix D - Proposed Site Plan 2021-563-13Z Page 4 of 4 12277I � 12288 O� ^I h( hlf7 � � : ' � a u� �n u� � N N N N N N N N N N STONEHOUSE AVE No o v O N � a N "' Y �^. � � ^ ^ ^ N N N ^ N N cv i 2251 0 1224 7 � O 12243 Z rn rn ^ N 2�9 12216 12 122os n rn rn � � � ^ ^ ^ ^ N N N N N 12264 � O OtD N N cv 12255 12250 12245 12240 12227 12230 �2? 12239 � `�� � �12234 �N 12225 N 12222 122132020-014-VP J � 12208 �O ^ O O) �— ^ �-- N N � N N N N N N N O "" 122 AVE � � O N tp b � O O O N N N N N N N N N N � N (+� ^ Q� ^ ^ ^ �— � ^ N tti N N N ^ �— N N � � � M � N ^ U .- N F- N N N ♦� '� 12217 12218 2020-014-RZ 12212 N h h N N N 12200 PROPERTY h h ^ � ^ O O h �t ^ O N N ^ eN— � ^ ^ N N N N N CKLUND AVE � o � � � � ^ N ^ N N N N N N 2016-411-RZ 201611�SD FABER CR 12101-53 � n � h �- �"'1 N � O h ^ � v^- O �_ � � � ^ ^ � N N N N N N N N N N N GLENWOOD AVE O � h to O � N ^ ^ �!' O � N N ^ �- ^ _ �- ^ O^ ^ N N N N N N N N N ONi 12069 �:I NI N� 12116 12112 ~ 12106 V1 N cV 12098 12090 12070 12050 12038 0 rn ^ �� N N �`�O ��Jr� N N ^ N N i2186 12171 12161 �ti�� 2129 � � o N I� N N O N N h O c7 N ^ �- c� N ^ N c+� N 122 AVE O � N N N N N I N I N I N I �� CAMPBELL AVE N O N N N M cti c`') M N ^ N ^ N N N ^ N 12156 12145 12138 rn � h rn o •�. c 12128 � � � `�' .N- .N- N N c v~i 121 AVE 12116 N N N N N 12115 � �- N N N N N 12111 12105 12i01 12100 iFl�Iki 12081 12086 12073 12070 2018=448=RZ 2044 M � h � 720� N N N � ^ .- 7� 02� � U W 12026 12015 � �"' 12022 ~ 12013 Z _��n�u ��� r'� � 21211 WICKLUND AVE �' P I D 009-887-792 -- i ;�' �� - PLANNING DEPARTMENT .._ _�. _ L .1 G_ _ �______ _--� � \ j1J ram\' _ ,, �-�� ;' mapleridge.ca Scale: 1:2,500 °`� FILE:2021-563-RZ DATE: Nov 29, 2021 BY: PC 21211 WICKLUND AVE P I D 009-887-792 PLANNING DEPARTMENT �� ;' mapleridge.ca `� �� "-'�-.-- '��" �- "`� FILE: 2021-563-RZ Scale: 1:2,500 DATE: Nov 29, 2021 BY: P C CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.7817-2021 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" Zoning Bylaw Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7817-2021." 2. That parcel of land and premises known and described as: Lot 6 District Lot 242 New Westminster District Plan 14112 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1941, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RT-1(Two-Unit Urban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , 20 READ a second time the day of , 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 READ a third time the day of , 20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of , 20 ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER 20 CORPORATE OFFICER `" 7 i N 12251 Y `�' `�' 12255 i 12250uo E P 9 155 LM 1 505 12247 0L372; 373 374 �— o � 12237 c`ry 380 of P 67224 354 347 a o 342 ti O — —1 1 0)12245 ! 12240 6 co 12243 Z 12227 C 12231223 - 0- 34112219 12242 00 7 8 9 9 a RW 67225 375 � 353 348 EP 606 1 o o 379 � �22�. 12 12239 ; 5 N co c* ,fig ----- 122 �' '� cv N — — — 340 12234 a N N N 221s 141 378 N 376 �� 352225 12213 122AVE 1222249 377 67224 1221 — — 351 350 339 Rem 4 rn o 0 Co CY) 142 a P 48 94 12217 12218 CO 12212 N N21 N 208 144 145 146 147 148 149 22 20 P 4 094 00 00 143 � � :° 150 N 152 153 N a 3 P 1 823 •� .- .- - - •- •- N N 12200 N N N N N N N N 122 AVE. Rem 2 P 5689 ---------------- 12196 220 221 222 22 -------- ca - -- — -- Co o P 5 583 o N o N P 62355 CoN f o N� f 1 rn N N N N N 1 0?N N N N N 12186 N N CCn o `� co 357 358 359 360 co N N 159 158 157 156 1 155 154 N Cvv CAMPBELLAV rn P 48 94 _ -- ------ d' 0 0 P 7r954 P 4112 Rem00 212171 oo N 1547 ; a N S N 1 2 13 12 11 10 175 2 1 6 5 4 N N N N d N � � LM 5769 N 231 23 M ^ a � N N Rem 1 a _ 3 LO (0 N N N N N N 12161 J LMP 5 8 N N N N— --- N ----- _N EPP 9 S45 4 P 568 - - WICKLUND AVE. LMP 38783 12156 232 - -- -- - ch M Nt to :° Co o o Co °' N CO 1 Co°� r� 186 12145 N 12138 � N 2 M N N N N N N N N a 2 00 Co 50 7 6 5 4 119 120 121 2 CO � P 19 72 P 7383 Rem N 180' E 2 12128 J a N N N N P 3460 121 A --- ----------- E_PP 12116 N Co to 126 12116 3 4 12115 0 Rem 1 N � 66 N 67 N68 0 1 �, 12101-53 2 (D 5 12111 M12112 P 7499 a P 47383 - -3250 �PP� Lu 1 6 a�� (EP 47384) v�i 12106 w 12105 w J NWS 336 P 47383 12101 a 12100 P 70721 N ----122 --- --- _ 394 RW 18394 RW 18394 -I - - - ------------------- 12098-- 12089 Rem 181 182 j P 48995 PARK P 74504 12081 A --------------------i 124 p 47p4Ftoj 125 12086 MAPLE Bylaw RIDGE No. 7817-2021 ZONE AMENDING Map No. 1941 From: R&1(Single Detached Residential) To: RT-1(Two-Unit Urban Residential) MAPLE RIDGEN SCALE 1:2,000 tj 1iP1V Cl Y V V� a 3 W yS2o Z z z �E 5g F,nri FA�W �d - a a>"� tL all _ Zt'92 aJ. 09*9 I rKZZI Z WiCt - �. gs�, (Z 0AAA i CL i J I I ZII N . i< i! � y NI I i T- CD NNO Wvel3saav/.Hv3N'NW I `y —— i co J 00I V — W6S01 3 )nvfll3saavAlHaei� ruozl AVM:IIVM.. ... - WZO"6 - ----- --- ---- -- tiv 92 __ -- -�— „95,C0,081 - - 08'9 5 sm we Z s F LU "'� `<'' � R` Sao a PWuz 5 TQ Z Z ow d ati d�� i� O o o Flo E= �a� �r�� PRP`R E3 fury " Wam LLOL3. �j o" , n o�W Ma W wgLL H �� pLoazn Hm om' =tea q�Nuo�, Nro- ® fEw z60=o a<iF W aV N o A a o nKKK� -+� 4 c 2LW=0g Lu Lu w Q �'� u -- �oLL aa m a�6�0= w<s a<y msw oo V :1 E Ifl a Q a a 0= m 6 n a§`��t'- o �et��' Z �id 'ooet•o�o��a�nn W Q o _.1 rNw 3 ° " w6= ;x`=ti�� =Eaa E=oa z '7 = ����< • Hwy '�--== a ® V Q V 6& LLsLLw so N W `^r'°`N�— n ��wtiw d»re�ru=����� W o an d y =6a oS` too z �woN F.. o Q y w ® LL� osm � Wow: ooa ym ��<' w�wW F� 3Ww asp V w Q.. V �t=i-t-� o. Siit-Qd; rcLA,rc Ste^ppc� `" Z _eiaivtri •o : t`C/) t'�',�"�,•'nm<m'�•- mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7821-2021 12390 216 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022 FILE NO: 2021-571-RZ MEETING: C o W An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 12390 216 Street, from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential), to permit a future subdivision of approximately two lots. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. As per Council Policy 6.31, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program. The CAC rates in Policy 6.31 area currently under review and if approved at an upcoming Council meeting, it is anticipated that this application would be subject to the new rates. The expected CAC contribution rate for this rezoning will be confirmed in the second reading report. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7821-2021 be given first reading; and further 2. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule B the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Mayur Mehta Legal Description: Lot B, District Lot 245, New Westminster District Plan 17760 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Proposed: Urban Residential Within Urban Area Boundary: Yes OCP Major Corridor: Yes Zoning: Existing: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Proposed: R-1(Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) 2021-571-RZ Page 1 of 4 1108 Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single -Family Residential Zone: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Designation: Urban Residential South: Use: Single -Family Residential Zone. RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Single -Family Residential Zone: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Single -Family Residential Zone: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement. b) Site Characteristics: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 934.7m2 (0.23 acres) 124 Avenue Urban Standard The subject property is 934.7m2 (0.23 acres) in area and is relatively flat with trees and other vegetation along the periphery. The subject property is bounded by single family residential lots on all sides (see Appendices A and B). There is an existing house on the site that will require removal as a condition of final reading. c) Project Description: The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) (see Appendix C) to permit future subdivision into two single-family residential lots (see Appendix D). Proposed Lot 1 will be 470.3m2 (503282 ft2) and proposed Lot 2 will be 378.6m2 (4075.2 ft2); both will be accessed from 124 Avenue. There is currently a Rezoning application (2021-092-RZ) submitted for the property to the north across 124 Street to rezone from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) (see Appendix A). Additionally, there is a Rezoning application (2018- 498-RZ) to the east to rezone from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RT-2 (Ground Oriented Residential Infill) to permit the future construction of courtyard housing of three units. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and further reports will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. 2021-571-RZ Page 2 of 4 d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject property is currently designated as Urban Residential in the OCP and is subject to the Major Corridor Residential Infill Policies 3.20 and 3.21. These policies provide criteria for compatibility with the surrounding neighbourhood, with particular attention given to site design, setbacks and lot configuration with the existing pattern of development in the area. Furthermore, the aforementioned policies support both multi family developments and smaller single-family lots. After reviewing the lot dimensions of the proposed subdivision, it has been concluded that the proposal meets Policy 3.20 and complements the existing neighbourhood context. In addition, there is a development application to rezone the property to the north to 13-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) and the proposed lots are comparable in size. The application to rezone the property to the R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) zone is compliant with the OCP Infill Policies and is supportable. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 12390 216 Street from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) (see Appendix C) to permit a two -lot subdivision (see Appendix D). The minimum lot size for the current RS-1 zone is 668m2 (7190.3 ft2), and the minimum lot size for the proposed R-1 zone is 371m2 (399354 ft2). The application will require a variance of lot depth from 24.0 m (78.7 ft) to 22.4 m (73.5 ft) due to the required road dedication. The variances being proposed are not final and may change throughout the development application process. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is not required for this application as the proposal is creating less than five dwelling units and there is no change in use, as per Council Policy e) Interdepartmentallmplications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading comments and input will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department; f) School District; and g) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing and site access requirements have not been undertaken. This evaluation will take place between first and second reading. 2021-571-RZ Page 3 of 4 f) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended. 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); 2. A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); and 3. A Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading, subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the Approving Officer. "Original signed by April Crockett" Prepared by: April Crockett Planning Technician "Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Charles Goddard" for Approved by. Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -- Ortho Map Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7821-2021 Appendix D - Proposed Subdivision Plan 2021-571-RZ Page 4 of 4 O N N N N 12508 12501 J 12502 M to N = N N 12503 xftPRING AVE 2149$ RING A WO 21491 Q N N Z J 4 12507 r' 12501 U) co h N to N SPRING AVE O Co rn rn Lo N N 12470 12469 2,�yp2 � 12471 = m 7? h ? N y1 Asp ty 4C) �2A N N � v vb a o o N N N N N N 124 AVE cc O O N V N N O ^ O O Lo O N N N N N M ^ ^ n N N N N N N 123 AVE a O N 12464 � 112444 12463 N 12443 'sB a a O to N N N N BO SPRING CRES N N 12463 '2A68 H co � ti to (o v tv tv 12455 N 21641 125 AVE 125 AVE 7o4oi N N V tt T rnCo(o1,1\ h(o N N N N 12429 12Vev � 2Q21-Q92-.SD xYl 2021-092-RZ 1� ('M Co MN Cn (o (oto Lo fp N N N N N SUBJECT PROPERTY 124 AVE 12395 N Lo Co Lh o F.. N N N N N 2390 U) 2018-498-RZ Q 12380 2018=498=D_P Lo W Co 12371 12368 tv tv 21g24 MANOR AVE 12365 GO 12357 `�Z to co 12358 C ^0Q� N tv tv tv N 12351 12350 12342 12343 I t� NI 12337 O O O O O O O � O � N h h 12297 Lo (10 co h to Lo to U) h h to O N N N N N N N N N STONEHOUSE AVELo to N N O O O N N N N N N Scale: 1:2,500 N N N N N 124 AVE N a O to V rn N N 0 � N MANOR AVE 2172s 21724 to ( N N N n N N 2021-512=RZ IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN N N N 123 AVE (D O O O b_ �O Lo O n _ (o (o (o (OO (o ^_ N N _ N N N N N N N N N fA 12314 cfl N 12292 12282 Co O O b 03 N va. N N N ry ���> RIDGEWAY CRES �� 12272 ss� N p N v r M W) h (o n N Co � n _ � N N ®-®-�- Ditch Centreline 12390 216 ST P I D 002-078-511 PLANNING DEPARTMENT mapleridge-ca FI LE: 2021-571-RZ/VP/SD DATE: Dec 16, 2021 BY: AH �r�r���� no�� 12390 216 ST P I D 002-078-511 PLANNING DEPARTMENT � � � � � �'.� � �� � � ( mapleridge.ca Scale: 1:2,500 FILE: 2021-571-RZNP/SD �� DATE: Dec 16, 2021 BY: AH WHEREAS, amended, CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW N0, 7821-2021 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" Zoning Bylaw Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7821-2021." 2. That parcel of land and premises known and described as: Lot B District Lot 245 New Westminster District Plan 17760 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1945 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the READ a second time the READ a third time the ADOPTED, the day of day of day of day of 20 20 20 20 20 CORPORATE OFFICER ch -1491 ] 223 N N Mimi - N — } 216 ° 214 222 �� 12470 12469 \ 12471 N o N 221 a?217 ry N a �Za�'1; CL 6O oo 201 c! N 3 EL // a� O 12463 .WAry Xo S Co ' / 218 a 1 220 219 200 0 6 P 46774 12443 I m P 2 796 47 6488 12429 42 43 44 45 7 W) � 46 tV N N N N N N 00 to N to to V N N N N N 121 Rem 3 214 215 216 217 2 P 62 40 218 12371 0 Co EPP1290851 P 13 00 0) 12 s5 L. c� 0)2 LO 00 CL N EPP 29999 12357 N W 3- - PP 2908 a i �o�ca P 17 43 P 18 25 P 72245 13 12 11 21 20 A 2 12343 N M � � ; P 72950 � U uO to N N N N N N B 12337 LMP 32554 LO U') to Rem 17 N N N N N N 12311 8 7 6 5 4 15 -_- 1R � V i47 69 N N 68 N 67 O Z' 205 12463 a P 2 514 W -_ - P 40038 *M. - 12464 — o — — — — BCP 35294 139 P 3418 136 � PARK P 3418 141 33418 137 138 � 140 c i 12444 = �' - - C\I --- 12455 246 21641 +� 125 AVE. N IT 4140 00 oNo N O co cp ti IT 1 55 245 �' ti� 12434 154 N 153 152 151 150 149 244 P 33418 12424 d o P 33418 P 2 390 L o f 3 M 156 157 5 6 7 8 9 c TMW Of i N v cMo oMo rn o 4_ a (0 co co co co <o NVOW t� NORM 12414 N a N N N N VROM N N N N J-- - ------...- LMP 16156 124 AVE. LMP 18319 _M :Re 1 LMP 1 440 LMP 1,9224 LMP 18021 LIW 19931 760 0 0 vt co 123$5 r- 204 O e— N0 � N E� N E� cfl c� ti N LOU00 E� W a a t oLO �! °ONE'1 aPOOOOO EiTOOO a 00 �a 0' z P 43 99 1 W cao 12380 a 181 `i w 1 Rem 12368 194 - N 0- 182 ^ 183 c"-- - '`y�-- 205; A / P 748 21624 MANOR AVE. LMP 4621 rn 195 � -- ^ —_ � N 123581Q� �y��O�� o�°` N 188 N 187 N 186 N 185 vftm ;� 2 196 1 N N 'L N 3 12350 W / P 4349 LMP 34059 12342 10 P 33 50 P 3 150 O 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 15 00 c.° 2 � coo (0 � coo (D 0) NORIO (0 Dow N N N N N N vftftv N N N N 123 AVE. .—so -- co co �r et <r / � c Remo VRRW (0 c(o o rn oNo"b N 127 N N N N N N N N N N o P32 1 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 7821-2021 Map No. 1945 From: RS-1(Single Detached Residential) To: R-1(S9ngle Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) N SCALE 1:2,000 U U c5 gy a m a) u T �u is > L <� d a d ^, APPENDIX D Aso .0 N O O Q `l (z) cn v "! � ,, o LO m ^ i p V ozSCl� s co �''-' i p �,c Eo > N� 00 .� o� poO s� A �QL p O O a ° h b Q b .0 C IF b k 6 J Q N 2 �O �) COZ6 O m`��a 4� yaa� mpg N O ^, O Q & W C p p° o a° c I k c g m o o ^4 U_ V 'O� O v0000 ^ O C ([J h C3 U �O W (i ii 4 R h C� 2� e N D m ° b O � N B C to 0 a `8 J o `e 2 R / C222 �`f /r in b 'r O .G• ,0 C � E a s 0 cc b p� b C O U T�x s b qq 6p r X X o C b $ a O +aJ OYLIMID OSZL 'A 4 r3 • �'i a a °� rci e s'a ftz cic C � -p.2 r % b er x S 6 OSS a---J2 A79 a o C cfft` P1i 447 Rt w2 g, CIO e$ o � S ova — Q i a a orqp 2r X C -C m 4�r I °$�v I X ?3 oo g c' Iqft ct o,.o° r zg .Q d a m I fir X N ?e �>r x N I F m' I `>r x =`? �r 2x r ° r�r m I i2r �. 'so PAN �r2r aoz dossIsm, A A coy Ad Ai x 0*661 t A a 2r, x q• m/ b r/ // / �x .c b q o e e� o 4N O (�u�J AM) H 4 %q (0Y F rx e r x `/ll x gbh x �11+x J� �n 9lC7 X a W O U erg d 2r �o N v so Con lz c � obK rx H r � ; i MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia 111INIULq 1 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022 and Members of Council FILE NO: 01-0640-30-2022 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Cow SUBJECT: Policy Review: Facility Allocation and Park Gift Program EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Policies previously under the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission (the Commission) are being updated to City of Maple Ridge policies to ensure they are relevant today and in the future. The two draft policies included in this report were brought to the Parks, Recreation & Culture Advisory Committee on September 29, 2021(and the Allocation Policy again for subsequent review on January 5, 2022, after some minor revisions), and endorsed unanimously to move forward for Council's consideration. These policies will guide the work done bythe Parks, Recreation & Culture (PRC) Division in supporting active and engaged citizens. RECOMMENDATION: That Policy No. 4.25 - Allocation Policy be adopted; and further That Policy No. 4.26 - Park Donation and Gift Policy be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: With the dissolution of the Joint Leisure Services Agreement in 2016, all Commission policies require a thorough review to determine if they remain relevant to guide Parks, Recreation & Culture staff and whether they need to be updated based on the new operating model. As the authority changes from the Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services Commission to Maple Ridge Council, subject matter experts on each policy reviewed the policies identified below, and recommend the following changes for Council's consideration. 1171 2916113 Page 1 of 3 Allocation Policy The Allocation Policy is recommended to be revised to meet best practices amongst municipalities to work within one policy to ensure a fair and consistent approach to allocation (Refer to Attachment A). City staff met with the Sport Network on April 4, 2021 to review the draft policy and collect feedback from sport clubs. Historically, the City of Maple Ridge worked within three (3) allocation policies that included fields, arenas, and indoor amenities. There have been no significant changes with the transition from three policies to one; however, staff made a conscious effort to develop a consistent approach to fair access, allocation priority, procedures, and guidelines. The Allocation Policy is updated to include the Key Areas of Responsibility in accordance with the City of Maple Ridge policy framework. Park Donation and Gift Policy The Park Donation and Gift Policy is recommended to be revised to meet best practices amongst similar municipalities while providing flexibility and expanded options for individuals and organizations to consider donations of park amenities to benefit the City's public spaces. The Policy was updated to include conditions for significant donations, such as documentation agreeing on the terms and conditions of a donation exceeding $10,000, as is consistent with other municipalities. The Park Donation and Gift Policy includes the addition of Key Areas of Responsibility in accordance with the City of Maple Ridge policy framework. b) Desired Outcome: To ensure that guiding policies are relevant and reflect industry best practices. c) Strategic Alignment: Policy development ensures transparent processes and provides citizens access to information and opportunities for engagement in the decision -making process. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: Having policies in place provide citizens and community groups with clear and transparent processes to apply to their circumstances when needed. 2916113 Page 2 of 3 CONCLUSION: Staff recommend that Council approve the Allocation Policy No. 4.25 and the Park Donation and Gift Policy No. 4.26 which will put clear criteria and guidelines in place for Council, staff, and the community. Prepared by: Russ Brummer Business Operations Manager /i Prepared by: Chad Neufeld, MBCSLA Manager of Parks plar 'ng & Development Reviewed by: Valoree Richmond Director of Parks and Facilities Reviewed by: Danielle Pope Director of Recreation &Community Engagement Approved by: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: (A) Allocation Policy -Draft (B) Park Gift Policy - Draft 2916113 Page 3 of 3 MAPLE RIDGE British Cotumhia • r r POLICY MANUAL Policy No.: 4.25 Title: Allocation Policy Supersedes: Authority: ❑ Legislative ® Operational Effective Date: ® Council Approval: ❑ CMT Review Date: ❑ General Manager Policy Statement: The purpose of this policy is to allocate space fairly and equitably that maximizes public amenities for the benefit of citizen participation in a variety of opportunities. Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to provide a framework for allocation of the City of Maple Ridge facilities in a manner that maximizes the use of these facilities with a range of appropriate services and activities while following the Parks, Recreation & Culture Fees and Charges Policy. The framework for allocation strives to ensure fair access regardless of age, gender, race, physical ability, or economic status. The City of Maple Ridge is committed to broadening access, ensuring opportunity, and equitably distributing resources for all participants of sport and physical activity. Citizens enjoy considerable benefits from participation in activities that take place in a variety of parks and facilities. This policy consolidates previous policies for facility use, seasonal sport field, and arena ice & dry floor to consistently govern the use of all City -managed parks and facilities including, but not limited to sport fields, courts, indoor spaces, arenas, and performance spaces. This document will guide the City in collaboration with user groups to administer allocation and manage priority allocation. Definitions: User Group: Any or all users with a Rental Agreement with the City of Maple Ridge to use City managed Parks and Facilities. Youth Local Non -Profit: Community and sport associations that serve children 0-19 years of age with a majority membership compromised of Maple Ridge residents. Age range may vary based on Local Sport Organization bylaws and Provincial Sport Organization standards. Doc#2916332 Page 1 of 4 Policy Adult Local Non -Profit: Community and sport associations that serve adults 20 years + with a majority membership compromised of Maple Ridge residents. Local Private Groups: Maple Ridge residents who are not associated with an established group, organization, or business using the park or facility for an activity or private event. Local Commercial Groups: Organizations that are for -profit doing business in Maple Ridge, or with the goal of serving Maple Ridge residents. Non -Resident: A person or business residing or working outside of Maple Ridge. Prime and Non -Prime Time Hours: Unless otherwise stated, prime time hours are 6:00 pm to L0:00 pm, Monday to Friday, and all day Saturday and Sunday. Non -prime time hours are all other times. Regional: Community and sport associations with members from both Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows. Allocation Priority: Priority of user groups to establish the order of providing allocation: 1St Priority: - Maple Ridge Parks, Recreation &Culture programs, events, and services 2nd Priority: School District No. 42 activities during the school day per the terms of the Tri-Party Master Agreement between School District No. 42, City of Pitt Meadows, and the City of Maple Ridge 3rd Priority: Youth Local Non -Profit and Regional Groups 4th Priority: Adult Local Non -Profit and Regional Groups 5th Priority: Local Private Groups 6th Priority: Local Commercial Groups 7th Priority: Non -Resident For Youth and Adult Local Non -Profit sport users, the following programming priority will be followed*: 1St Priority: 2nd Priority: ity Special E *Events and Tournaments for Ice and Dry Floor are determined annually following the Special Event request process and in cooperation with minor sport users, arena operator and the City. Allocation Conditions: Users wishing to enter into an agreement with the City for the use of Parks and Facilities must: A. Be in good financial standings with the City and fulfill previous year's financial obligations. Doc#2916332 Page 2 of 4 Policy B. Adhere to all park and facility codes of conduct and regulations, including the Parks Regulation Bylaw. C. Demonstrate the ability to utilize the time provided. When administering the process, City staff retain some discretion to adjust the allocation for City priorities and meet the needs of all user groups and casual users, including providing time for new and emerging sports sanctioned under a Provincial Sport Organization. Allocation Procedures: Allocation is managed by the City annually based on season of play or operational needs. Submission timelines will be communicated to user groups through the City Facility Booking office. The submission process will include the following information. A. A completed allocation request form with dates and time of year requested and organizational contacts. B. A signed statutory declaration including the previous year's participant enrollment numbers, level of play, and residency status of participants. C. A Special Events request form if applicable. Allocation Application Deadlines: Seasonally Allocated Requests in for Contract Requests in for Contract Issued Facilities SprineSummer Issued Fall/Winter Fields &c Outdoor -November 30- March 1- April 1 June 30 Playing Surfaces Arena Ice May 1 July 15 January 15 Feb 28 Arena Floor Annual Allocation Requests for Sep -Aug Contract Issued Indoor Facilities June 1 July 15 Allocation Guidelines. In the scenario when demand exceeds the supply of available space and time, the City will consult with stakeholders under the following considerations. A. The number of Maple Ridge residents registered as participants, players, members, or athletes in the organization. B. The number of participants using the park or facility during the allocated time compared to the capacity of the space (density of use). C. Appropriate time and location for specific age group, activity and level of activity. D. Achieving an equitable balance of Prime and Non -Prime Time Hours. E. Management of parks and facilities playable condition that maximizes use while minimizes the impacts and viability of the asset. F. Meeting the minimum requirement of a Provincial Sport Organization. G. Alignment with City priorities and maximizing public good by ensuring a variety of sport and physical activity options for residents of all ages and abilities. H. Participant enrollment and activity that support inclusivity and equal access for all. Allocation Appeals: Doc#2916332 Page 3 of 4 Policy If a user group is not satisfied with the allocation decision, they can submit an appeal to the Director of Parks & Facilities for outdoor space, or to the Director of Recreation & Community Engagement for indoor space within two weeks of notification of the decision. The appeal in writing should be directed to. Parks, Recreation & CUltWks; Department City of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Key Areas of Responsibility: Action to Take • Allocation submission deadline City Staff communicated to user groups and public. Work collaboratively with the City of Pitt City Staff Meadows to facilitate field and arena allocation for regional clubs. Submission of completed allocation request prior to the application deadline. User Group Responsibility Doc#2916332 - Page 4 of 4 Policy mapleridge.ca Policy No.: 4.26 Title: Park Donation and Gift Policy Supersedes: New Authority: ❑ Legislative ® Operational Effective Date: ® Council Approval: ❑ CMT Review Date. ❑ General Manager Policy Statement. The purpose of this policy is to identify opportunities and provide a framework for individuals or groups to voluntarily contribute gifts that provide community benefits and enhancement of the City's public spaces. Purpose: The purpose of establishing a donation and gift policy is to provide opportunities for individuals and groups to enhance the City's public spaces through the gifting of functional, engaging, and attractive amenities that increase the enjoyment of all visitors. The Parks, Recreation and Culture Department is responsible for administering the Park Donation and Gift Policy. Definitions. Standard Gift Options. Individuals, organizations, or service clubs wishing to donate an amenity such as park benches, picnic tables, and park trees; or to adopt an existing park amenity may do so by paying a fixed donation amount. These types of donations are typically less than $5,000. The donation amount includes the cost to purchase and install the amenity with a single inscribed plaque, and the cost of maintenance to ensure the gift remains in good condition for the term. Significant Donations: Individuals, organizations, or service clubs may donate or contribute to the more specialized park or facility amenities such as playground equipment, water fountains, picnic shelters, outdoor fitness equipment, spray parks, or other types of public amenities. These types of amenities are generally valued above $5,000. Each request will be reviewed by staff to determine the design, installation, and maintenance costs. The potential donor is then advised of the cost(s) for the proposed donation. Financial Donations: Individuals, organizations, or service clubs may choose to make a financial donation to the City to support City facilities, programs, or services. These financial donations are not marketing partnerships or reciprocal agreements, and the donor will not receive any benefit beyond a charitable donation tax receipt and a recognition plaque. Doc# Page 1 of 3 Policy No. General Guidelines: Cl) Locations of Donated Amenities City staff will assess each location to determine the most appropriate sites) for each type of donated amenity and the maximum number accommodated at each location. In cases where a suitable site(s) for the proposed donation is not available, the donor may be offered an alternate site(s). The final decision on an appropriate location for the donated amenity rests with the Director of Parks and Facilities or their designate. The donated amenity immediately becomes the sole property of the City, and the donor has no further ownership of the amenity. The City may relocate the amenity at its sole discretion for reasons, including safety, maintenance, or redevelopment of the location. The City will make every effort to notify donors of any significant changes to the donated amenity when possible. (b) Term The City shall maintain all donated amenities, including trees, and repair and/or replace vandalized items for a period of ten (10) years. The term begins on the date of the installation. When the amenity needs to be replaced, the plaque will be removed, and the site(s) will become available for new donations. The plaque will be returned to the donor whenever possible. (c) Recognition Plaque Donated amenities are intended to enhance the use and enjoyment of all visitors of the City's public spaces. Donors are encouraged to choose plaque wording that is positive in tone and respectful. Donors cannot embellish donated amenities with wreaths, personal memorials, or other items which may discourage public use and/or increase or interfere with maintenance activities. Final approval on the wording of recognition plaques rests with the Director of Parks and Facilities or their designate. Recognition plaques are limited to one plaque per donated amenity. Donation Conditions: Donations must be given unconditionally and voluntarily. City employees and officials cannot receive personal benefit from any donation, nor can the donor expect benefit beyond what the program specifically provides. The City cannot accept donations or gifts from potential donors known to be involved in activities that contravene laws, City Bylaws, or City values. Significant donations of $10,000 or more in value will be documented through an agreement outlining the terms and conditions of the gift. The City will also request that the potential donor discloses in writing to the City if they or their organization or company is currently or has recently been involved (in the previous 12 months) in a planning approval or procurement process with the City or one of its related organizations. In such a case, the City may, depending on the circumstances, refuse the donation, request a waiting period, or take steps to insulate information about the donation from decision -makers involved in the planning or procurement process. Donors may wish to designate financial donations to support specific approved programs and services, projects, facility developments, asset improvement, restoration, or maintenance. The C Doc# Page 2 of 3 Policy No. will, at its sole discretion, decide whether a donation to a specific program is accepted. Financial donations made to the City for general community benefit will be incorporated into the City's general revenue and allocated as the City determines. The City will acknowledge donors by a written Expression of Gratitude and will receive an official tax receipt through the Park Donation and Gift Program, for accepted financial donations higher than $20.00. A donor may wish to remain anonymous; however, the City would require the donor's name and contact information to issue a tax receipt. The donors' private information will be treated with confidentiality subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act unless the donor authorizes the release of such information for a specific purpose. The City may accept or decline any donation in its sole discretion. Key Areas of Responsibility: Action to Take Responsibility • Maintaining a catalogue of gift amenities and prices. • Working with donors or groups on specific details Parks Administration and surrounding standard, significant, and financial donations. Parks and Facilities • Receiving inquiries and processing applications for gift donations. • Coordinating the promotion of the Park Donation and Gift Program. • Identifying future locations/opportunities for park gift donations. Supporting Documents by Reference: Park Donation and Gift Procedures Park Donation and Gift Program Catalogue Doc# Page 3 of 3 Policy No.