Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutADP 2020-07-22 minutes.pdf City of Maple Ridge Advisory Design Panel MEETING MINUTES The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Maple Ridge Advisory Design Panel held via video conference on Wednesday, July 22, 2020 at 4:09 pm. STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Michelle Baski Planner Wendy Cooper Staff Liaison, Planner Erin Mark Committee Clerk PANEL MEMBERS ABSENT Narjes Miri Architect AIBC 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA R/2020-019 It was moved and seconded That the agenda for the July 22, 2020 Advisory Design Panel meeting be approved as circulated. CARRIED 3.ADOPTION OF MINUTES R/2020-020 It was moved and seconded That the minutes for the June 17, 2020 Advisory Design Panel meeting be adopted as circulated. CARRIED 4.QUESTION PERIOD – Nil 5.NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS – Nil PANEL MEMBERS PRESENT Stephen Heller, Chair Landscape Architect BCSLA Meredith Mitchell, Vice-Chair Landscape Architect BCSLA Emily Kearns Architect AIBC Steven Bartok Architect AIBC mapleridge.ca Advisory Design Panel Minutes July 22, 2020 Page 2 of 2 Note: At 4:12 pm Meredith Mitchell announced a conflict of interest with File No. 2019-428-DP and recused herself. 6.PROJECTS 6.1.Development Permit No: 2019-428-DP The staff liaison provided a verbal overview of the project. The project team presented details of the 22 storey apartment building proposed for 22709 Lougheed Highway and answered questions from the Advisory Design Panel. R/2020-021 It was moved and seconded That application 2019-428-DP be supported and the following concerns be addressed as the design develops and submitted to Planning staff for follow-up: Architectural Comments: ·Consider adding scaled massing on the east elevation to provide additional levels of scaling; ·Consider adding intermediate or rooftop outdoor amenity space; ·Consider design techniques or materiality to address overheating concerns on south and west elevation; and ·Improve access to storage in corners of underground parking due to limited accessibility when vehicles are parked adjacent. Landscape Comments: ·Consider reclaiming space in the parking area for amenity or green space; ·Utilize the base between the surface parking and the parkade slab to provide more trees and additional planting soil; ·Consider applying surface treatment ie. colour, patterning, or texture to pedestrian routes between the building and mall; ·Vary the seating arrangements between the front plaza and the public sidewalk; consider L-shaped seating, planting buffers to improve the social interaction; ·The project has a significant amount of bike parking, consider integrating the bike parking into the seating areas; and ·Provide more planting buffer between the common amenity on Level 2 and adjacent private units. CARRIED 7.CORRESPONDENCE – Nil 8.ADJOURNMENT – 5:28 PM. Stephen Heller, Chair /em ~1S