HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-01-27 Council Meeting Agenda and ReportsCorporation of the District of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING A GENDA
January 27, 2004
7:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
MEETING DECORUM
Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at
Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with
the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary and
conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council Meeting in
any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be reprimanded.
Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.org
The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or
resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or
resolution.
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 OPENING PRA YERS
Pastor Rod Shearing, Highway Church
300 PRESENTA TIONS AT THE REQ UEST OF COUNCIL
301 Web Mapping Demonstration, John Bastaja, David Cooke
400 ADOPTION OF MINUTES
401 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of January 13, 2004
402 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of January 7, 15,
and 19, 2004
403 Minutes of the Audit & Finance Committee Meeting of October 27, 2003
Page 1
Council Meeting Agenda
January 27, 2004
Council Chamber
Page 2 of 6
500 DELEGATIONS
600 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
601 Downtown Core Use & Occupancy Payment, February 2004
700 CORRESPONDENCE - Nil
800 BY-LAWS
801 RZ/055/03, 12293 227 Street
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6157-2003
To rezone from RS- 1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R- 1 (Residential
District) to permit future subdivision to create one lot under the R- 1 (Residential
District) zone.
Final reading
802 RZ/080/03, 12031 230 Street
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 61 66-2003
To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to CS-i (Service
Commercial) to provide for more on-site vehicle stacking for the drive through
use and provide additional parking for the existing Tim Hortons
Final reading
803 RZ/074/03, 12470 Blue Mountain Crescent
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6156-2003
To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residentia)to permit future subdivision of the site into two parcels
Final reading
804 Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Municipal Advisory Committee on Accessibility
Issues Amending Bylaw No. 61 65-2003
To amend the mandate and composition of the Committee
Final reading
805 Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No. 6147-
2003
To update the parking standards for the Office Tower, Arts Centre and Theatre
and to provide for multiple-use shared parking
Final reading
Council Meeting Agenda
January 27, 2004
Council Chamber
Page 3 of 6
806 Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees Amending Bylaw No. 61 89-2003
To amend admission fees for the Maple Ridge Leisure Centre
Final reading
COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RE COMMENDA TIONS
900 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
901 Miii utes - January 19, 2004
The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with
the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration
and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held
in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting.
Public Works and Development Services
902 RZ/088/02, 12258 224 Street, First Extension
Staff report dated December 19, 2003 recommending that the subject application
to permit construction of 108 apartments be granted a one-year extension.
903 DP/043/03, Northwest corner of 240 Street and 104 Avenue
Staff report dated December 22, 2003 recommending that the Municipal Clerk be
authorized to sign DP/043/03 to permit a subdivision adjacent to Spencer Creek.
904 DP/062/03, 24207 102 Avenue
Staff report dated December 29, 2003 recommending that the Municipal Clerk be
authorized to sign DP/062/03 to permit a subdivision adjacent to a tributary of
Spencer Creek.
Council Meeting Agenda
January 27, 2004
Council Chamber
Page 4 of 6
905 DP/047/03, 13819 232 Street
Staff report dated December 29, 2003 recommending that the Municipal Clerk be
authorized to sign DP1047103 to permit a subdivision adjacent to Anderson Creek.
906 DP/080103, 12031 230 Street
Staff report dated January 14, 2004 recommending that the Municipal Clerk be
authorized to sign DP/080/03 to permit reconfiguration of a drive throughlparking
area for Tim Hortons.
907 VP/030/03, 26025 103 Avenue
Staff report dated January 14, 2004 recommending that qualifying property
owners be advised that approval of VP/030/03 to postpone the requirement to
upgrade and construct roads fronting a parcel of land that is the subject of a rural
subdivision application will be considered at the February 10, 2004 Council
meeting.
908 Traffic Signal Installations - 2004 Program
Staff report dated December 30, 2003 providing the schedule of signal
installations and the relative priority of intersection signalization needs for 20
intersections.
909 RZ/061/02, Inclusion Into Sewer Area "A", 23791 132 Avenue
Staff reported dated January 7, 2004 recommending that Maple Ridge Sewer Area
"A" Sewerage Works & Construction & Loan Authorization Amending By-law
No. 6 190-2004 to include the subject property into Sewer Area "A" be given three
readings.
910 Inclusion into Sewer Area "A", 20981/83/85 123td Avenue
Staff reported dated January 9, 2004 recommending that Maple Ridge Sewer Area
"A" Sewerage Works & Construction & Loan Authorization Amending By-law
No. 6 192-2004 to include the subject property into Sewer Area "A" be given three
readings.
Council Meeting Agenda
January 27, 2004
Council Chamber
Page 5 of 6
911 Expansion of Curbside Collection Area and 2004 Recycling Charges
Staff report dated January 14, 2004 recommending that Maple Ridge Recycling
Charges Amending Bylaw No. 6193-2004 to allow for expanded curbside
collection services be given three readings.
Financial and Corporate Services (includin' Fire and Police)
931 Adjustments of 2003 Collector's Roll, Supplementary Roll 11/2003
Staff report dated January 6, 2004 providing information on changes to the
municipal tax roll records.
932 Tag Day Soliciting, Royal Canadian Air Cadets
Staff report dated January 12, 2004 recommending that the 583 Coronation
Squadron of the Royal Canadian Air Cadets be granted permission to conduct Tag
Day soliciting on Friday, February 27, 2004 and Saturday, February 28, 2004.
Community Development and Recreation Service - Nil
Correspondence - Nil
Other-Committee issues - N-i-i
1000 STAFFREPORTS
1098 MAYOR'S REPORT
1099 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS
Council Meeting Agenda
January 27, 2004
Council Chamber
Page 6 of 6
1100 OTHER MA TTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
1200 NOTICES OF MOTION
1300 ADJOURNMENT
1400 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
QUESTION PERIOD
The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to seek
clarification about an item on the agenda, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws
which have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members.
If a member of the public has a concern related to a Municipal staff member, it should
be brought to the attention of the Mayor and/or Chief Administrative Officer in a
private meeting.
The decision to televise the Question Period is subject to review.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes only to ask their question (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium).
The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes.
If a question cannot be answered, it will be responded to at a later date at a subsequent
Council Meeting.
Other opportunities to address Council may be available through the office of the
Municipal Clerk who can be contacted at (604) 463-5221.
Checked by:_________________ Date: )Le._. 2z_/c
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
January 7, 2004
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Mayor Kathy Morse
Chairman
J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
Member K. Kirk, Recording Secretary
1. SD/117/02
LEGAL: Lot 3, Section 16, Township 12, Plan 5849, NWD
LOCATION: 11710 232 Street
661683 BC Ltd.
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS Subdivision Servicing Agreement
THAT THE MAYOR AND CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE
PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SD/117/02.
CARRIED
Mayorathy Morse J.L. (J) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
Chairman Memyer
q 0 2---
3
Cli
26
iB 119
_____
27
10
7I rSi'. 1 098 11903 11902
_
188
1i885 11892
____
24454 8 1189 28
f29C.)
NIGHTINGALE AVE __w P70911 I 38 1186 11870 0
24
9 ________ -a_____ 12
W 1188
8 13 14 5251 50 4914814 11875 1185 ____ ______ - CO
23
118
11860 47 1186 30 2 i 61
I
60L59
70 69 / / 55 58 57 C)1189 1 22 46 1185 11858
31 .1 rt .' FM o
F,
56
6 3
11865 LMP 17226 21 45 5
1184 32 HIPPOORW ILL AVE 53 /
11870 1183
1184.4
11838 I 1832
1 4 23385
F
11839
1183 33r4 F) FM ) 65 ______________
5 11834 - 1 P 10448 1182
19
18
14
_______
3
.1822 62 63
11831 1 Al ___ 1181 11820 I Rem. 44 Go
1l81 11816 I 6 — 1182
49 18 15 _____I P2616
I
C- 2 LMFI
_____
441
P 06 1 73 72 71 70' Rem
36 P 36329 1180 1808 I l i 2 3 F 17 16 SFF 151 F) 2
i11804 _____ I — 11821 r- 110 AVE 110 AVE 14 AVE Ob
Jig
70234 'r,10 12 F 1 I 4Rem _ I EP1O811 I 1 2 I 6 8 9 78 rTJ_ im 114115 16 17 i8-6 5 J 111776
A I 7034 1 13 7034
Rem. 11756 75454 I W 21 1 20 5 9ê 18
1981 17 ,
22 J)75454 32
_____
F) F
11755/59 INST 6 117B AVE 117B AVE 16
io (ii / 4 42 20 1175 /11750 15
21c'.j 8 1174 12 1 1
11738 /11740 P 5454 117 ' 22 11730 N-
1710
3 Cn E232!4 251 P 5849
SubjectFM,
117 AVE
8-
Jt 10 35 32
"e 11688 10561 p-; I 31 k 168626
I 27 2
11698
"30, CONSRV
111682_N- 11692
I 28 ci 11691 > 1168 LMP 1479 B 111674 29
1168
4 •L_ctcii1
0 Rem. 28
111666
30
1167
5
11680 "27 / S
11658
____ 0) N-1167 11
'I
6 CH4O
I 31 11650 1166 11668 59
m1 32
1 11642 1166 -I 11662
iiI 33c 11634_N-
8 1165 ' > 0) 4645 FM FM I 40 / 3
/11626_N-
p1164
FM FM/ FM
2 1 35 CL 116AAVE
11616
I 361 37 C)
FM FM FM CM 2 11600 CM FM
FM FM F) FM CM 38 /
B/ CM F) I F) CM F) FM F) F) F) f F) F) LMP36961
12l3 1 1 18 120 LM1
11 116 AVE
I 111588 (EP14351) P 6682
PcI. 1
2 0 OQ1
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
January 15, 2004
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Mayor Kathy Morse
Chairman
J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
Member K. Kirk, Recording Secretary
1. RZ/061/02
LEGAL: Parcel "A", Section 28, Township 12, NWD, Plan BCP3646
LOCATION: 23791 132 Avenue
OWNER: Insignia Homes Rockridge Ltd.
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Covenant - Rezoning Development Agreement
THAT THE MAYOR AND CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE
PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO RZ/061/02.
Mayq,athy Morse
Chairman
CARRIED m
H /
J.L. (Jii) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
Member
13333 J13332
13
I
12
13329 54
11 CRES
13325
=AULEY
14
- - - - 53
10
W13321 13
NJNJ NJ NI 52 Co 9 15's' 51
i3317 13318 2 45 46 47 48 49 50 36 8 16 LMF :46 3 3741 13313 < 33U
35 2
23782 . 23743
1
______ C) 13310
18 211 f31412S 31 32 2
23745 3305 13306 27 28 29 30 I 23746 f19 ________ i i I 13301 . 20 l I C 133 AVE 3 AVE // 43 LM
Subject Property P154 2 P 2637
B 1.8925 R S- 3 Rem B
Rem 14
C) 23 - 24 - W285.9B
- P46272
18
A
N. N. N.
RS-2
NJ N) 0
NJ NJ
2AVE
NJ N.
_____ -co
N.
j
N.
NJ
NJ
"A"
LMP 744 P 2637
P2637
4 I The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy or
"B" present status of the information shown on
this map.
OIS1RICTOF I N N1I
SILVR 23791-132 Ave.
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF A
DMTRCTOF
RE
MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE
Incorporated 12, September, 1874 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SCALE: 1:2,50 Y MAP _____ DATE: Jun 14 2002 FILE: RZI061/02 BY: DS
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
January 19, 2004
Mayor's Office
PRESENT:
Mayor Kathy Morse
Chairman
J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
Member K. Kirk, Recording Secretary
1. SD/120/02
LEGAL: Lot 41, Plan 64285, District Lots 401 & 402, NWD
LOCATION: 11645 Richie Avenue
OWNER: Concordia Homes (1997) Ltd.
REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Subdivision Servicing Agreement
Covenants - Statutory R-O-Ws (drainage & municipal
works); Amenity; Geotechnical
THAT THE MAYOR AND CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE
PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO SD/120/02.
CARRIED 7)
Mayo.l(athy Morse J.L. (Jim)IRule, Chief Administrative Officer
Chairman Member
'4 19
IbR
-2-32
0
P 82501
NW 3147
11601
H
LMP 13596
Ln to to
LMP 19680 1609
LMP 10787
2
11605
LMS 618
LMP 3942
2509
N-- g
CN N-
CN
z
0
'2JP469 JW E ItE4 j Rem. 3 Ii I 1~~4
fl-22
P2 162
P 9819
P4l69 13 12 C D M 1698
i
''
U)U)
Ro B
Rem. 23
em. 58 P 18056 EP 16567
48518 "
18 19 LMS 2190
P469 A 1 P 87282
70 0)
6322' A 4 -lRM- LUC
P7016
19 20 21 22
30 18,''c 23
1b ' N — I _J.i R S-I
7 14i' '? 25 P64285
REM. 41
'2O 29
0 183 SUBJECT PROPERTY 76 31
22574 32
22572 33 1
22Sio 34
35 M-2
IN 37 "36
19
0 n
RM-4
p4
P 82113
ry
IV LMS 9
ZP57408
LMP
10032
51
P21553
LMP 571
662 R -86
1 LMS1
IN IN
P
18
P83871
3
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
AUDIT & FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
October 27, 2003
The Minutes of the Audit Committee Meeting held in the Blaney Room of the Municipal Hall,
11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, B. C. on October 27, 2003 at 11:00 a.m.
PRESENT
Committee Members
Councillor Harris, Chair
Councilior Dueck
Mayor Morse
Councillor Speirs
ABSENT
Mayor Morse
Invited Councillors
Councillor Daykin
Municipal Staff
J. Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
M. Murray, General Manager of Community Development, Parks
and Recreation
F. Quinn, General Manager of Public Works and Development
Services
J. Sorba, Director of Finance
D. Sartorius, Municipal Accountant
C. Mario, Confidential Secretary
Councilior Hams, Committee Chair, called the meeting to order.
Approval of Agenda
The agenda was approved as circulated.
Review and Adoption of Minutes of Meeting
MOVED by Councillor Speirs, SECONDED by Councilior Dueck
that the Minutes of the Audit & Finance Committee Meeting of September 29, 2003
be approved.
Update on Business Planning Sessions
The Director of Finance advised that the schedule for presentations has been prepared and
will be distributed early next week.
q03
Audit & Finance Committee Meeting Minutes
March 17, 2003
Page 2
Investment Portfolio Update
The Director of Finance advised that the investment portfolio has not changed significantly
in the last month. The market continues to be volatile and staff is taking a conservative
approach to investing. Benchmarks have been met but the Director of Finance was unsure if
this would continue for the remainder of the year because of the uncertainty of the market.
He indicated that the returns from the portfolio would exceed the budget estimates for
2003. He attributed this to more funds being available for investment purposes because
expenditures have not occurred, particularly in the capital program, selling certain
investment instruments to realize the capital gains, and as well, trying to take advantage of
some of the volatile swings in the market place.
Financial Operation Results - September
The Director of Finance indicated that a full report would be provided to Council in early
November. It appears that on the operational side of the budget there will be a surplus in
2003. He attributed this to revenues exceeding budget estimates in the areas connected to
development such as building permits, subdivision fees, tax certificates etc. and a higher
return on the investment portfolio. Expenditures in transportation, public works, general
government and protective services will be below budget estimates. He advised that unless
something happens in the 4 th Quarter, the utilities could come in under budget.
Consolidated Operating Statements - Third Quarter
The Director of Finance explained that the consolidated statements state the position of the
District with respect to the outside world. Internal transfers are eliminated in this statement.
He reviewed the statements noting that capital expenditures are under budget, investment
revenue and sale of services will exceed the budget target; net financial assets are ahead of
the comparative period in 2002. He indicated that the balance in the Capital Works
Reserve is not where we would like it to be and is precariously close to the 10% of current
taxes that we try to maintain for an emergency. He felt that unless something untoward
happened in the last quarter of 2003, our net financial position would increase for the year
on a consolidated basis.
New Business - Nil
Adjournment - 11:20 a.m.
Councillor Hams, Chair
Final version - 10/31/03
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: January 13, 2004
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/055103
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Final Reading:
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6157 - 2003
12293 227 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Bylaw 6157 - 2003 has been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently granted 2
and 3rd reading. The applicant has requested that final reading be granted. The purpose of the rezoning is
to permit the subdivision into 2 lots.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6157 - 2003 be reconsidered and adopted.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on September 16, 2003. On
September 30, 2003 Council granted 2 nd and 3'' reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6157
- 2003 with the stipulation that the registration of a Restrictive Covenant for building design guidelines be
registered at the Land Title Office prior to final reading.
On December 23rd, 2003 the Restrictive Covenant for building design guidelines was filed at the Land
Title Office.
CONCLUSION:
As the applicant has met Council's condition, it is recommended that final reading be given to the bylaw.
Prepared by: Bruce McLeod /
Frank Quinn
GM: Pub)iç Works & Development Services
J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
I P I I
IN Co I CO
I IN 2 12397 1154 155
19343
156 157 158 159 N N N
Co N I N N IN N IN
Co I N N
Co Cl Co N P17942 L N N
N
c.ilm N
NIN
N I u,N N cm N
6 117 14 15 16 17 1 18 19 REID AVE
P27 30
CC, a) 12381
112370 I 1 1 1 I
P1883 21 173
N cli 172
N
I171
N.
I170 169 r 168 I
I I 12371 N-I
P 39 59 I P 4305 (N
(NI I 6 P 2555 I I I I
I,..211 N212 N213 C,,214 _215 I._216 ._217 285 I 286 I 112358 92 93 94 95 96 Co CO N Co C) Co __________
Co I N Co CO Co N N N N Co N N
Co I N N Co N N Co N 12355J N I C N N N I I l I lo
LEE AVE I N1 Nj NI I
I N N1 N __N ________ N _N1 N N N1
I Co Co Co Co 0 Co 0 CC 0 Co 0 I 195 I
123 AVE 123 AVE 206 2O4 203 202 (201 200 199 P39421 I I (12333 I I-
L--21051
_____ 4 91 - N clA 84 N 83
p 1958
_
P 40'38 N N N
14 16 17 18 19 20 21 219 218 0 Co N N N Co C) 0 C) C IC\J 3 90 85 82 Co N Co Co Co I N I N I N IN IN •N JN N I N IN JN IC'1 N N 12311 2316 12321 2314 61) 1231
I23AVE
,- 14) N 14)
86a.
14)
a 81
I I Col Co IN IN 311 2302 1230
NICo IN
Subjet
'rii12297
\ COlA) 6 js 8 lc4NIN7 I NIN coI fN4 IN
Co N Cl 1 12298
1 87 80
P 1p358 I I 12293 12290 1228;
I P4234 I / P 29696
/ 1 220 CCI
43 244 245 (246 247 248 127 2284 12275 0) r- F
Co N Cl
A)! Col Co 1 N
J N coI N I NI
12281 N- 2 221
'4) a) ¼RK p
HINCH CRES 223 I J 2272 12271
250 12263
112250
122
260 I 12264 330 0) 12261 257 !258 259 I260 I 261 I I 308 N I N
P42134
N J 251 a 224 CL)
331 N 123 I I I 12257 12254 122530
P2134 12240
I 256 255 I 254 I 253 N I 252 ( 122 M24 1 2 P
Co CO N N
CCI NI Co( Co Col Co NI NI N N N N
CC WI 12239 12244 P 14 96 12243 12230
122 AVE N CoN Rem. P2893
226 225 131 130 12228 P6
N N N N Cl CC _
j
12230 12231 12222
Co
N
N Co I Co CC) Co N I N N NI N •N NI I I P7219 197 1
234 233 I 232 231 230 I 22 Rem. A 1 12218 P 1
P42134 12219 12214 to 12221 to 12216 (0 N cm 2 c198 6
12208
-
12203 fal P1439 12211 12208
I I I 265 280 12195 I 66 IN 12193 12194 I C1 7 12192 CCI N-
I 12187 I I I Q_b4
N j 12293-227 Street
A i CORPORATION OF
I LANGLEY \-\_ALBIO
7 I
THORNHILL Incorporated 12, September, 1874 PLANNI
SCALE 1 2000 KEY MAP - - DATE Jun 6 2003 FILE R055I03 BY JV
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BY-LAW NO. 6157 - 2003
A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6157 - 2003."
Those parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1, Section 20, Township 12, Plan 19358, New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1311 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this by-law, is/are hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District).
Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200.
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200.
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of A.D.
200.
MAYOR CLERK
AVE. 124 AVE.
2 /2397
P17942
(0
A0 116 117 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
30c14 P 2 7730 ___________ 12381
0- P 18883 21 CL
12371
T 2Hoi F T - P 413205
212 213 2l4 215 216 217 285 286
12355
\ LEE AVE. RW 39660 1F[
199 195 l 206 l205 2O4 203 202 201 200 P39421
207 /E:Pt9Z2\ __E 4 12JJJ
Ln P 19358 14h438
12 13\ 14 15 "16 N, 17 N, 18 Z19 20
'
21
c, 219[218 I
0-
(o
1123/1
123 AVE. 0
87 6 5 4 N 3 2 1
19 58 EPl45584'\ P 19358
. 242\ \IEP 4489P 412134 I I P 29696
250 /2263
/2250 N
251 o224
12250 12257
122 AVE.
/2239 I
~'2
Rem.
22 225
-Il P719
281 em. A
12219
4
N 12211
I : 20.1 I I (N 12795
0-2 I I 12187
-
1241"
112257
240
/12247
1239
142237 15.2
1238
142227
237
N
.40
244[245246 7 248,j 27 281
I IvV
.- HINCH CRES. 223
13.135 ha
257 258 259 260 261
P 42134
P 4
256 IN 255 254 253 252
122 AVE.
J'N'
232 —-- 231 230 229 P
192 191 ZI 190 P,I 189 188I 187i 186I A
I P40137 ____________
- fh-w 42 -- H -
154 160161
I i
"1 REID AVE.
12J70
i I
1 73 172I171 170I169I168167 I166
-
-
-
555 I 3.0J
I I I I 12555 .i I I I
12358 92 93 94 95 96 97 98
5 I 0_ N N I i
(N
123 AVE.
15.2 NN 4 91 84 83 15.2 11
3 Ln 90 852 LO 82
12316 Ln 12321 12314 12313 12314
N (N (N I-
20 0-89 86 o81
12308 12311 w U 12302 12301 0z 12304
1 88
I 87 80
12298 12297 12290 12287 - 12286
12284 1 o
If)
220 \ NN
Rem.64 \I
221 \ P 11200
/2272 0- 12271
122
\1RK
PARK
12264 (0 !L 308 N
CL
123 \ 331
12254 12253 P 4
12240
1 2 P I57607
12244 P 14396 12243 12230 i I 334 (C
- P 28J39 18.3 340 CT
' 117
131 130 12228 P 162578 12230 122JI 12222
ii 2 0- 1 l97 12218 P171970
12214 (j 0)
1222 12216 -
2
N
I 198 6
12208 0- 12203 P 14396
40
66 C'o 265 ? 280
j 1219 12194
12192 0)
I 279 RF
(1 264
1218 12184 0-I
MAPLE F1DE ZONE AMENDNG
Bylaw No. 6157-2003
Map No. 1311
From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
To: R— 1 (Residential District)
CAN LWOMW~11M~R A MAPLE RIDGE
Incorporated 12 Sept.ember, 1874 N.T.S.
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Final Reading:
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6166 - 2003
12031 230 Street
DATE: January 20, 2004
FILE NO: RZ/080/03
ATTN: COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Bylaw 6166 - 2003 has been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently granted
2 nd and 3(1 reading. The applicant has requested that final reading be granted. The purpose of the
rezoning is to improve both the existing traffic circulation and provide additional parking for the
existing Tim Hortons site.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6166 - 2003 be reconsidered and adopted.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on October 21, 2003. On
October 29, 2003 Council granted 2' and 3rd reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.
6166 - 2003 with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed:
Registration of a Rezoning Development Agreement including the deposit of security as
outlined in the Agreement;
Road dedication as required for 230 Street.
It will be necessary to file a Cross Access Easement Agreement at the Land Title Office;
Removal of the existing building;
A report, prepared by an acoustical engineer, on noise attenuation;
6). Application for.Development Permit Area. XXXVII.isreceived,..and.
7) Consolidation of the development site.
The following applies to the above:
A Rezoning Development Agreement has been deposited at the Land Title Office and the
security outlined that that Agreement has been deposited with the District;
A Road Dedication Plan for the required 230 Street right of way has been deposited at the
Land Title Office;
A Cross Access Easement Agreement has been deposited at the Land Title Office;
RM
A Building Removal Agreement has been entered into for the removal of the existing house.
The Applicant has applied for a demolition permit and some of the services have already been
disconnected. It is estimated that the house will be demolished within 180 days.
An Acoustical engineer has provided a report as to sound attenuation, (copy attached). That
report identified that an acoustical fence would be required at the north and west sides of the
site and provided specification to be met in order to achieve sound attenuation. The report
also spoke to the designed height of the fence to obscure the line-of-sight from adjacent
residences (bedroom windows). These detail are part of the design drawings that will form
part of the Development Permit that Council are considering for this site.
An application has been made for a Development Permit.
The development site has been consolidated and the plan has been deposited at the Land Title
Office.
CONCLUSION:
As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that final reading be given to Maple
Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6166-2003.
Prepared l: Gay McMillan
- - GM: Public Works & D opment Services
/
Concurrence: J. JL. (Jim) Rule
C11ief Administrative Officer
GM/bjc
-2-
256 ci cj 270 111 279 0) CD 12127 0) 0) C\J C'.J 1
12125 (/) 12124 --
Q. 372 0
'••.f
12155 12148
280 11 257 269
12115 12114 0) 26 12153
12116 2146 1
0. --
258 268 281 10 374
12105 12104 12107 __________________ 3
12151
259 267 282 32 375
9 CD 12149
12095 12094
12073
r-
12106 N.
12085 283 P 15849
457 0.. 12147 264 265 266 12084 8 Cl) 377 RS- •i 12067 31 12145
C'1 284 d 12057 io co 378
12074 I 23°i
P20969 CD
12064 12053 0.. 23011 RE EY '\VE a. RS — b
30
cj 310 — 12056 3 o 0 0 0
309 CD-1-9 2" 3 4 cslJ
cq R —1 38 Rem.
S1 b 12041 0
383 P 4291 P4507"N S 318' 380
39 ofA 381 382
12031 P 6242 P 66938 P 2891
P 7651 P 45071
Rem. S-1 R
Rem. I .W 100' 312 311 Subject R!1 of B 1
P47120
0) 0) 0 c1
'0 'a 0) cl
cs-ICO CI 0 0
f
C'1
P 84291
c'1 \
C\I C')
DEWDNEY TRUNK RD
I
o H
to I
RE C) I C" 0) 0) (14 ('4 0) 0) o 0) 0) 0)
U) (0
('4 ('1
(0
Rem
215 I 216
0 C') C" —. — N- (0 ø P565201 N.
P5 011 P57491 U) ________ a.
11975
220 229 230 231 223 224 218 217 PcI. I EP 10384
11982 P 34984
P4378 / IM
45 11980
1
11955
N
PITrMEJIL]J
12031 — 230 Street
Ic
t_
[ CORPORATION OF
LSTRICTO I
/
THE DISTRICTOF
NGLEY
ThORNHILL Incorporated 12 September, 1874 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT
SCALE 1 2 500 KEY MAP DATE Jul 8 2003 FILE R080/03 BY JV
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BY-LAW NO. 6166 - 2003
A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6166 - 2003."
That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 39, Section 20, Township: 12, Plan 32509, New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1314 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this by-law, is hereby rezoned to CS-i (Service Commercial).
Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of
READ a second time the day of
READ a third time the day of
RECONSiDEREff-ANFIN-AL-LY ADOPTED; the
200.
A.D. 200.
A.D. 200.
A.D. 200.
,A.D.200.
- dayof , A.D.
MAYOR CLERK
I
12115 12114 1- I 26 1215 1214j
12116
281 10 1 N374
tcxJ 1215
268,2,0 12104 12107 0 I 121419
I 267 Li_i 282 o 32 1N 1214 I 12095 Li_i 12094 12073 1"rT) 12106 N
It
CL 1 1 I 1208 283 P 15849 CL 1 457 1214
64 265, 266 15.212054 8 co 377
0)
284
12067 17.1 31 1214
INN 12057 12064 cc 378 1 (0 2j073 0
12074 N 18.6 P 20969
12064 1205.. 30 CL. 2J
310 CL 2
12056 9 A 3 ° ° — P 6242 3N 4c\.J 5 309 ° 38 Rem.
P 8491
1204A S 318' 1380 38
r039 of A 381 382
CL79031
P6938
]
2891 P 7651 P 45071 LMP 4 .20C
Rem. LMP 4119 1 W100' 312 311
of B 1 317 Ip
P47120
84291 c..j
c'.J DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD C\J
lRemjj
7
00
~"
cc 215 1 216i
'-° P561520 l P 1 5801 1 1 IF,, 57491 CL 1/9751 Ctf
_ 229 230231 223 224 218 917 I
MAPLE RIDGE. ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No. 6166-2003
Map No. 1314
From: RS—i (One Family Urban Residential)
To: CS—i (Service Commercial)
MAPLE RIDGE
Incorporated 12 September, 1874 1:1 500
21Otfl bII-iti WOODEN POLE, SOIl, STETLIGHT,
ECT, 50, 4 3 TRMSFORIERS
RECEIVED I
STATISTICS
NEIU LOT
CIVIC. ADDRESS 12031 - 230TH STREET,
MAPLE RIDGE, HO
LEGAL 1)ES<,RIPTIONi LOT 3-1,
PLAN 32501, UWOT, S5320, TP. 12, )UNC',
PlC OON-PAS-SSO
EXISTING LOT
CIVIC AIX)RESS 22151 CEkIDNK(
TRUNK ROAr', NA?LE RIDGE, GO
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT S EXCEPT:
PLAN 32509, SECTION 70, TP 12,
NIUD. PLAN 15004
EXISTINA ZONE R5-I
(NEW LOT)
PROPOSED ZONE CS-I
(NEW LOT)
EXISTING ZONE CS-I
(E2'-ISTING LOT.'
SITE AREA 553.1 mZ (NEW LOT)
SITE AREA 7,042 nO
(EXISTING LOT)
SITE AREA 2,332 nn2
(COMSINED LOTS)
TIM NORTONG AREA 251.5 nO
LOT COVERAGE 9.19
PARKING REQUIRED IS STALLS
RESTAURANTS (I PER 4 SEATS)
PARKING PROVIDED t 32 STALLS
PROPERT'C LINES OF I ADJACENT SITES ARE
APPROXIMATE AND AREI
5)4051-4 FOR REFERENCE I ONLT'
BROWN TRACHAN ASSO TBS
A. Strachan, P.Eng.
R.AS/ih/030ct/Urbanl . let
Encl
H
NOV. -04' 03(TUE) 11:39 BROYN STRACHAN ASSOC TEL:6046892703 P.002
PROiThCT: 546.033,
October 31, 2003
Sandhurst Holdings
do Urban Design Architects Ltd.,
600 - 1140 W. Ponder
Vancouver, B.C.
V6E 401
Attefltion: Mr. Riciard IColodzie
Dear Mr. Ko1odziej
NOV 062003
:
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Further to your fax received October 31, 2003, this letter will
confirm our review of the revised fence detail.
SUMMARY
The detail reviewed (copy appended) shows sol
groove boards with grooves caulked, to minirni
This fence is cons idéred equal to any other 6
mass of 2 psf or better, with respect to its
sound. Any sound transmission will be litttite'
the top of the 6 ft. high solid portion of th
Please call if you have any questions.
Yours very truly,
2 x 6 tongue and
air leaks.
t. high fence with a
ility to attenuate
by diffraction over
fence -
U-
cm =
OD
C."
a..
I..'
-D 4-
-J
I,
4-
C,
.4-.
C,
I.-
a I-
I, a,
Ca -D
a
U-
a, a.
C."
(.4
C.)
'.4 2. C,
PLAN DECORATIVE BOLTS AT REGUALAR
INTERVALS TI-IRU BEAMS
2x' E4CI-1 5DE
I \ END CURVE flPJ -
Jj 4 x '0 CARRIAGE
-?L 1i\ SOL1S ThIRU
1 h1IIN'-2x& TOP RAIL
''cJ 1k-2x4 NALER
0
tj —,xFOST Lq
d 2x4 NAILER
2x2 LATTICE (qORZONTAL)
1x2 I_AlT ICE (VERTICAL) -
7r2x KCK OARl)
1rl— BOTTOM RAIL
cr
6 2x,T4GBOARSUJ/
CIROO'/E& CAULKED
—' ..
FOR ACCaJBIIC
—'"
SECTION
2 i
0
0
00
IOi BEAMS TO
00
RECEIVE CO55 PIECES
IUIN
Immil
• I
T1PCAL ELEVATION CF NELU ACOUSTC FENCE
GENERAL NOTES;
ALL WOOD 10 BE FT. HEMJFIR
TUJO COATS CF PREMUM UJEAThIERPROOFING STAIN,
(COLOUR TO 3E PRE APPROVED BY OUkER)
ALL HA.DWARE TO SE DIPPED GALVANIZED.
W4RDUJARE TO BE MEDIUM 6AUGE.
Aug-26-03 02:O3pin From-Urban Design Group Architects Ltd.
JUL. -08' 03(TUE) 1250 BROWN STRACHAN ASSOG TEL;6046892703
çj 1c G*=MMffQ nnoks=
1-598 P.002/006 F-516
1'. UU 1.
OL7EcT: 54. 03
JuLy 'I, 2003
sdht Mo1d±rig
c/c Tjrbaz Design T,1-c..,,
00 - 1140 W. Pander
Vancouver, B.C.
V6E 4G1
ttentiOrL: 1& .Richard so1 ôdiej
Dear. N. Kc1odzie:
ritlLRorton 's, MkL_ Ri
Further to your telephone uPst, wk coriftrm that the EQ=e at the
north and west sides of the property should be a solid material
weighing 2 psf such as 3/4w plywood, 12 ga. steel, etc. A "good
ne.g1bour" type ot tence is not eqLlivalent. The fence should be
desi9ned to a ie.ght which ob Lhr line-of-sight rrom adjacent
residnce (bedroom windows) to a point zbout I m above the mew loop
road elevation around the no-tth tr,d nf the' site.
Our report will be submitted in the near future5
Yours rery triJ_y,
&OWN STR2cEN ASSOCIATES
David W. .tvWn, P. En -
DWB/lrJ035ruly/Urbanl - let
VmI,m Suam 92-1290 HOmarSL V,urnn,,vr Caadn VCB 2Y6 reI: 604 SaG 0514 Fox: 604 65S 70
Aug-26-03 02:03pm From-Urban Design Group Architects Ltd. T-598 P.003/006 F-616
JUL. -25' 0.(FRI) 11:02 SROYN STRACIiAN ASSOC TEL:6046892703 P. 002
IIU
On Awugr=
p1o47gCT 546.
23rd July, 2003
saridhurst holdings
do T3rban Design Architects Ltd.,
600 1 1140 W. render
Vancouver, B.C.
V6E 4G1
Attentione Mr. Richard. ôlodzie
Dear Mr. Kolodziej:
geTim gortmla,- Maole Ridge
Further to our evaluation of the existing Tim Horton' s operations on
16 July, 2003, appended are our measured.data.
The proposed acoustical fence at the north and west sides of the site
(print appended) should be a solid material weighing 2 pst such as
3/4" plywood, 3.8 ga steel, etc. A "good neighbour" type of fence is
not equivalent. The fence should be designed to a height which
obscures the line-of-sight from adjacent residences (bedroom windows)
or the north and west sides, to a point about mi above the new loop
road around the north end of the site, or a minimum of 6 ft,
whichever is the higher.
With the view obscured by the proposed upgraded fence, anticipated
noise levels from the new pax -kirig/c2irculation, at the adjacent
housing, will be approximately 5 decibels lower than currently exist
at the adjacent housing. This 5 decibel decrease allows for a 25%
increase in traffic volutrte visiting Tim Eorton's (+1 decibel).
Yours very truly,
BROWN STRACEAN ASSOCIATES
wy~~,
David 14. Brown, PEng.
B/j1h/03.ily/Urban2 . let
end.
Aug-26-03 02:03pin From-Urban Design Group Architects Ltd. 1-598 P.004/006 F-516
JUL. -25' 03(FRt) 11:03 BR01N STRACHAN ASSOC 'J'IJi;bO4bH921U1 r. uu
wem 'sai 'ii fl LI 7
I av tinL iu urw iws nj
SNQ.LIC3H VU.L (IL NU1LVAON3 g
I
N
mom
1P. PRIEN%
I 11
!iI
LU
LU
Rix
it
Hill
__
MAX
DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD
I
FIG. 1:, Measured Noise Level of Existing Drive Through Traffic.
(16-JUL4)3, aprox. 15 L from centrefirie ol existing thive thmugh traNLc.
too
go
(a
j70
so
0
50
Li ....................." ...............................ill.............
1I'1 ii"1 .......
........................ii.LI...J .........
d.
...
i DiBae ii ofi I1 ( ii
No Valb aIIrIvi
ao riIiuie sampepirbd IBA (Leq) I NC
40 I I I 1t I I I I I I I It
E E E E E
Time
f 7juIoH3flTNr ChnI I
t41 PIA
cm ca
FIGI 2: Measured Ndse Level OpposIte *14021 2301h Street.
(16.J1JL.03 epprox B IL east DI 23Mb Street uib)1
I-
100• -
90 ..
CD
8O . h --..-------------------------------------------------------------
Ca I
I c Ty0calva9mmn2th$tret
70
cn
CA
cn co
I ¶
115 ITJnUID GIW18 perlad 61 A Leq).. I '1
4C • I I I
E E E E S S E E E E E S E S a. a a. a a.
gn
!
j 41
Time
Ui
R: Cher( I ci
I3lJ
97,
Peo,'
17,11%
Aae55
ccD-'5
E
-H
9LOd -'
T alod
3.50
rj - .1 I F L - J -
H •: iJ
—WOPt>RiuJa 7 5 k-
L!!
__ rr 5,98M
A
-
44u wr'-L i
LII I
Q
.1 I I h.
I i
I
I _ L— j
gti1;1 rrn
. J [LLEEL
___
r
j I. OF5ii
4i' I
itL I
No
PU KIA
L I
Ij 1 —J
I1l-cI'
3.30
øocz
0 < 1.:
2. CJ
/
'-1.2± BCTEL
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO:Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: Jan. 12, 2004
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ1074/03
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Final Reading: Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6156-2003
12470 Blue Mountain Crescent
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6 156-2003 has been considered by Council and at Public Hearing
and subsequently granted 2' and 3" reading. The applicant has requested that final reading be granted. The
purpose of the rezoning is to permit the subdivision into two lots not less than 0.4 hectares (one acre) each.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 61 56-2003 be reconsidered and adopted.
DISCUSSION:
Background Context:
Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on October 21, 2003. On October 28,
2003 Council granted 2nd and 3rd reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6156-2003 with the
stipulation that the following conditions be addressed:
Approval from the appropriate authorities for septic disposal; and
Approval of the lot depth variance requested in Variance Permit Application VP/074/03.
The followiun annlies to the above:
Approval from the Fraser Health Authority has been received for septic disposal. As there is a limited
area for a reserve field on Lot "A" the Fraser Health Authority recommends registration of a
restrictive covenant to reserve the area for septic disposal purposes only. Health approval is also a
condition of subdivision approval. Accordingly, it is recommended that the property be rezoned and
the restrictive covenant will be registered concurrently with the subdivision plan;
Application VP/074/03 was approved by Council October 28, 2003.
CONCLUSION:
As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that final reading be given to the bylaw.
PrepaiI by: Davd Stev son - Planning Technician
vYS<ne Pic , F, MCIP - Director of Planning
Approved by: ra Quin GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J. 4 . (Jim) Rule - ChiefAdministrative Officer
4 -
V DS/bjc ~03
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BY-LAW NO. 6156-2003
A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6156-2003."
That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1, District Lot 6881, Group 1, Plan 34391, New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black lne on Map No. 1310 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this by-law, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential).
Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. -
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200.
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D.
200.
MAYOR CLERK
LI
MAPLE RIDGE -20N-AND-I-N-G--
Bylaw No. 6156-2003
Map No. 1310
From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential)
To: RS2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
IMAPLE RIDGE
A
Incorporated 12 September, 1874
1:2500
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BY LAW NO. 6165-2003
A Bylaw to Amend the Maple Ridge - Pitt Meadows Municipal Advisory Committee on Accessibility
Issues Bylaw No. 5 845-1999
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in open meeting
assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
This Bylaw may be cited as the "Maple Ridge - Pitt Meadows Municipal Advisory Committee
on Accessibility Issues Amending Bylaw No. 6165 - 2003".
2. That Maple Ridge - Pitt Meadows Municipal Advisory Committee on Accessibility Issues
Bylaw No. 5 845-1999, be amended by:
Deleting Section 5 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
Section 5 "The purpose of the Committee is to advise, inform and educate the Councils,
municipal departments, community agencies, and general public on
accessibility and disability issues".
Deleting Section 6 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
Section 6 "The Committee is comprised of fifteen (15) members."
Deleting Section 7(vii) in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
Section 7(vii) "Fraser Health Authority"
Deleting Section 7(viii) in its entirety.
Deleting Section 8 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
Section 8 "Fhe remaining eight (8) members are called Members-at-large."
(0 Deleting Section 9 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
Section 9 "Six (6) of the eight (8) members at large must be:
a resident of Maple Ridge; or
employed in Maple Ridge; or
be eligible to be on the Municipal Voters List for the District.
The seventh (7) and eighth (8) members-at-large must be:
a resident of Pitt Meadows; or
employed in Pitt Meadows; or
iii) be eligible to be on the Municipal Voters List for the
District."
Deleting Sections 15(i) and 15(u) in its entirety and replacing it with the
following:
Section 15(i) "Six (6) members at large from the District of Maple Ridge shall be appointed
for a two (2) year term";
Section 1 5(u) "Two (2) members at large from the District of Pitt Meadows shall be
appointed for a two (2) year term".
To add the following to Section 16 stating that:
Section 16 "In the event where there are circumstances and it is not possible to appoint a
member at large, and where leaving this post unfilled would cause a lack of
support to the Committee".
Deleting Section 20 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
Section 20 "Quorum is five (5) members of the Committee"
READ a first time the 13th day of January, 2004.
READ a second time the 13th day of January, 2004.
READ a third time the 13th day of January, 2004.
RECONSIDERED and finally adopted the day of January, 2004.
MAYOR
CLERK
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BY-LAW NO. 6147-2003
A By-law to amend Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350 - 1990 as
amended
WHEREAS. it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and
Loading Bylaw No. 4350 - 1990 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE. the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in
open meeting assembled. ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Off Street Parking and Loading Amendmg Bylaw No.
6147 - 2003.'
2. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No 4350-
1990 is amended as follows:
That PART III OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS is amended by the addition
of item 3.7 as follows:
"3.7 Multiple Use Developments
Shared parking facilities of two or more Commercial, Educational, Assembly, Civic and
Institutional establishments may be permitted when the maximum demand for such
parking facilities by the individual establishments occurs at different periods of the day,
and is supported by a parking study. The parking spaces so provided shall not be less
than 75% of the total required by the individual uses."
That SCHEDULE "A" OFF-STREET PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS is
amended as follows:
Section 2.0 Commercial Uses, item f) "Business Office I per 30 m 2 gross floor
area" be replaced with "Office I per 40 m 2 gross floor area"
Section 5.0 Civic Use, item a) "Offices I per 47 m 2 gross floor area" be replaced
with "Offices 1 per 40 m 2 gross floor area".
Section 5.0 Civic Use be amended by the addition of item d) "Theatre and
Cultural Centre 1 per 4 fixed seats"
3. Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990 is hereby amended
accordingly.
READ a first time the day of 2003.
READ a second time the day of 2003.
READ a third time the day of 2003.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED the day of 2003.
MAYOR CLERK
,~o 50,
~'j
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: 2004 01 22
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council Workshop
SUBJECT: Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees Amending By-law No. 6189 - 2003
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Council gave three readings to Bylaw 6 189-2003 at the last regular meeting and will consider final
reading on January 27th Subsequent to Council giving three readings staff have received input with
respect to the family definition contained in the bylaw. Currently it reads "Family is defined as two adults
related by blood, marriage or common law with their own children under the age of 19". As a result of the
input received it is recommended that the bylaw be amended at third reading to include a new family
definition as follows. "Family is defined as one or two adults related by blood marriage or common law
with their own children or grandchildren under the age of 19." We are advised that final reading for the
amended bylaw will need to be considered at the next regular Council meeting to meet the procedural
requirements of the community charter.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That the first three readings granted on January 13, 2004 to Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees
Amending Bylaw No. 6189-2003 be rescinded.
That Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees Amending Bylaw. No. 6198-2004 be read a first and
second time and that the rules of order be waived and Bylaw No. 6198-2004 be read a third time.
DISCUSSION:
a.) Background Context:
When Bylaw 6 189-2003 was given three readings Council requested that notification be provided to
users of the Leisure Centre of the change. Notification has been provided at the front entrance and
through the newspapers. A limited amount of public input has been received. That input is related to two
areas of the proposed bylaw. The first has to do with the change in the family definition. One local senior
was concerned that the definition no longer permitted he and his spouse to bring their grandchildren into
the pooi under a family admission category. Two other seniors have expressed concern about the
elimination of the lower admission rate for using part of the facility.
With respect to the first concern we agree that this should be addressed and consequently we have
proposed a further amendment to the family definition. For clarity we have also added the notion that a
family admission would also apply to a single parent bringing this or her children to the facility.
With respect to the senior admission rates we recognize the change will result in an increase for those
seniors who have prdviouSly only used the lower rate ádniision category. IHaving said that the rates have
not increased in three years and remain among the lowest in the GVRD for Senior Citizens, as noted on
the attached comparison.
M
Desired Outcome:
The report offers a further amendment to the bylaw to address the first concern noted above. Overall, the
bylaw change will result in a simplified admission structure, the elimination of wristbands and an increase
in admission revenue to offset a portion of the increased costs experienced in running the facility.
Strategic Alignment:
The Business Planning guidelines of the District direct that fees will be reviewed on a regular basis and
increased as required to offset increasing operational costs and to avoid very large increases being
implemented over a longer period of time.
Citizen/Customer implications:
The increased cost to citizens has been documented previously. As noted in earlier reports the Parks and
Leisure Services Commission does provide a participation program to help those with lower incomes
access services including the Leisure Centre. Lower cost swims are also offered and will be expanded in
2004.
Interdepartmental Implications: N/A
1) Financial Implications:
The change in fees will save costs (approximately $20,000 in wristband supplies) and generate additional
revenue although the exact amount won't be finally known until the 2004 year-end. Rough estimates
suggest revenues may increase by as much as $40,000-60,000. The reduced costs and increased revenue
will help to offset some of the increased costs of the past two years related to utilities and staffing.
Conclusion:
Public input has been received with respect to the proposed rate increases. At least some modifications
are proposed as a result of that input.
by: Mike Murray
General Ma ger: Co munit
ce: J. L. (Jim) Ru e
Chief Administrative Officer
Development, Parks and Recreation
.MWM
j•j _____.
(11 pasé) (pool only)
Child
single $ 2.50 $ 2.60 $ 2.25 $ 2.20 $ 2.00 $ 2.05 $ 2.46 $ 2.50 n/a
10 pass $ 22.50 $ 20.80 $ 19.13 $ 19.86 $ 17.50 n/a 3.98 $ 20.00 n/a
20 pass $ 40.00 n/a . $ 35.10 $ 33.00 $ 32.60 n/a' n/a . $ 37.40 n/a
1 mo $ 25.00 n/a $ 21.60 $ 25.00 $ 25.60 $ 19.00 $ 21.00 $ 19.00 1 n/a
mo $ 65.00 $ 63.00 $ 54.27 $ 71.00 $ 70.85 $ 38.00 $ 47.05 $ .54.00 $ 62.40
6 mo $ 125.00. $ 120.00 n/a . n/a n/a. n/a $ 84.70 n/a $ 118.56
1 yr $ 250.00 $ 214.00 n/a $ 204Q0 $ 212.55 $ 114.00 $ 162.00 $ 190.00 $ 212.16
Student ___________ (youth 13-18)
single $. 3.10 $ .3.7b $ 3 05 $ 4.00 $ 2.75 $ 4.00 $ 3.55 n/a n/a
10 pass $ 27.90 $ :29.6:0 $ 25.93 $ 36.00 $ 23.40 n/a $ $5.42 n/a n/a
0 pass $ 49.60 n/a $ 47.58 $ 60.00 $ 44.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a
mo $ 3100 n/a $ 29.28 $ 38,00 $ 34.40 $ 36.00 $ 30.60 $ 27.25 n/a
3mo $ : 85.40 $ 95.00 . $ 73.57 $. 104.00 n/a $ .71.90 $ 69.70 $ 80.00 '$ 92.30
6 mo $ 167.00 $ 180.00 n/a n/a . ri/a n/a $ 125.05 n/a $ 175.37
yr . $ 334.00 $ 321.60 n/a $ 371.00 n/a $ 215.00 $ 2$1.45 .$ 265.00 $ 313.82
Adult .
.iingle $ 5.00 $ 4.95 $ 4.25 $ 5.00 $ 3.50 $ 5.25 $ P4.75 $ 5.00 n/a
10 pass $ 45.00 $ 39.60 $ 36.13 $ 45.00 $ 29.80 n/a $ 47.41 $ 40.00 n/a
20 pass $ 80.00 n/a . $ 6630 $ 75.00 $ 56.00 n/a n/a $ 75.00 n/a
1 mo $ 50.00 n/a $ 40.80 $ 50.00 $ 44.50 $ 1.48.00 $ 41.05 1 $ 38.00 n/a
3mo $ . 130.00 $ 126.00 $ 102.51 $ 140.00 $ 123.25 1 96.00 $ 93.40 $ 108.00 $ 123.50
6 mo $ 250.00 $ 240.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 167:95 n/a $ 234.65
1 yr $ . 500.00 $427.00 n/a $ 464.00 $ . 369.75 $ . 287.00 $ 319.65 $ 380.00 $ 419.90
Senior 60+ 65+ .65+ 60+ . 65+ 65+ : 66+ 60+
single $ 2.80 $ 3.50 $ 2.95 n/a $ 2.50 $ 4.00 $ .3.20 $ 4.00 n/a
10 pass $ 25.20 $ 29.60 $ 25.0.8 n/a $ 21.10 n/a. $ 32.01 $ 32.00 n/a
20 pass $ 44.80 n/a .
.
$ 46.02 n/a $ 39.80 n/a n/a $ 60.00 n/a
1 mo $ 28.00 n/a t $ 28.32 n/a .7 $ 31.4 $ •36.00 $ .28.40 $ 30.00 n/a
$ 75.20 $ 95.00. $ 7115 n/a . . $ 87.$ $ . 71.90. $ 63.00 $ 86.00 $ 78.00
16 ma $ .j46 00 $ 18000 n/a na - n'z 1/a 113 25 n/a $ 148.20
1 yr $ 292.00 $ 321.00 n/a fl/a $ 262.05 $ 215.00 . $ 215.55 $ .308.00 $ 265.20
Family (swim).
single . n/a' $ 8.75 $ 10:25 $ 7.00 n/a $ 2.40 3 10.00 n/a
10 pass .$ 78:70 n/a - n/a $ 92.25 $ 63.0b n/a . $ 23.98 $ 80.00 n/a
20 pass $ 140.00 n/a - n/a $ 153.75 $' . 126.00 n/a n/a $ 150.00 n/a
1 ma $ 87.50 n/a $ 84.00 $ 82.00 $ 89.00 n/a n/a. $ 76.00 n/a
3 ma $ 231.10 n/a $ 211.05 $ 238.00 $ 246.50 n/a n/a $ 216.00 $ 247.00
6 mo $ 446.50 n/a n/a . n/a n/a n/a n/a . . n/a. $ 469.30
.1 yr $ .893.00 n/a n/a $ 779.00 $ 739.50 n/a n/a . $ 715.00 $ 839.80
Parent/Tot
single $ 5.00 $ 5.20 n/a $ 5.40 n/a n/a I n/a . n/a n/a
10 pass $ 45..00 $ 41.60 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
. 7 . .
All Ages All
lncJusive
3m0. 147.50
6mo. 280.25
1 yr.501.50
(3mo. Mirmum)
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
By-law No. 6198 - 2004
A By-law to amend Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees
By-law No. 4117— 1988 as amended.
WHEREAS the Council, may by by-law establish and regulate the fixing of fees for admissions
and/or use of sports, recreation and community use facilities;
AND WHEREAS, the Council has imposed fees and now wishes to amend those fees;
NOW THERFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in open
meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees Amending By-law
No. 6198 - 2004".
That Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees By-law No. 4117 - 1988 as amended, be
further amended by deleting Schedule "F" in its entirety and replacing with Schedule "F"
as attached hereto.
This By-law shall come into force and effect as of February 1, 2004.
READ a first time the day of ______,2004.
READ a second time the day of ______, 2004
READ a third time the day of ,2004
RECONSIDERED and finally adopted the day of ________,2004.
MAYOR
.....CLERK
Attachments: Schedules "F'
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BY-LAW NO. 4117-1988
SCHEDULE "F"
6198-2004
ADMISSION FEES EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 1,2004
All Inclusive
Single 10 Pass 20 Pass 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month 1 Year
Child 2.50 22.50 40.00 25.00 65.00 125.00 250.00
Student 3.10 27.90 49.60 31.00 85.40 167.00 334.00
Adult 5.00 45.00 80.00 50.00 130.00 250.00 500.00
Senior 2.80 25.20 44.80 28.00 75.20 146.00 292.00
Family 8.75 78.75 140.00 87.50 231.10 446.50 893.00
Parent & 5.00 45.00 80.00 50.00 130.00 250.00 500.00
Tot
Fees include use of Pools, Fitness/Weight room, Gym facility, Courts, Adult
Drop in, Gym Drop in Programs
Definition of 'Family" as of February 1, 2004:
"Family is defined as one or two adults related by blood marriage or common-law with
their own children or grandchildren under the age of 19."
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor K. Morse DATE: December 19, 2003
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ1088/02
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Rezoning - First Extension
12258 224 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant for the above noted file has applied for an extension to this rezoning application
under Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. This application is to
permit construction of 108 apartment units under the RM-2 Medium Density Apartment
Residential zone.
RECOMMENDATION:
That a one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/088102.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Focus Architecture and Planning Ltd.
Owner: Dowco Construction Ltd.
Legal Description: Lot 15, Sec. 20, Tp.12, Plan 1161, NWD
OCP:
Existing: Apartment District (100-250 units per net hectare), Park,
Conservation, Compact Housing (40 units per net hectare)
Proposed: Apartment District (100-250 units per net hectare), Park,
Conservation
Zoning:
Existing ------------- RSl(OffeFamiiyUrbantResidential)
Proposed: RIvI-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
Surrounding Uses:
North, East & West:
South:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Access:
Servicing:
Previous Applications:
Residential
Vacant
Vacant (one derelict building)
Residential
2201 St.
Full Urban Standard
None
-1-
This application is to permit the construction of 108 apartment units in two buildings.
A requirement of the development process will include the site into Development Permit Area V
to ensure the form and character of the development at the Building Permit stage.
The following dates outline Council's consideration of the application and Bylaws 6091 - 2002
and 6092 - 2002:
- The land use report (see attached) was considered on December 12, 2002;
- First Reading was granted December 12, 2002
- Public Hearing was held January 22, 2003;
- Second and Third reading was granted on January 29, 2003.
The following are the outstanding Council conditions to be addressed prior to consideration of
final reading:
Registration of a Rezoning Development Agreement including the deposit of security as
outlined in the Agreement;
Amendment to Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan;
Amendment to Schedules "A" & "H" of the Official Community Plan;
A preliminary geotechnical report which addresses the suitability of the site for the
proposed development;
A Statutory right of way plan and agreement for a public access walkway must be
registered at the Land Title Office;
Road dedication as required for 224 St. and for the pathway to provide access from 224
St to Fire Fighter Park;
A restrictive covenant to provide for the Development Cost Charge forgiveness of the
Park dedication for conservation purposes for the tributary of Legion Creek;
Transfer to the District that portion of land required for Firefighter Park.
-2-
CONCLUSION:
The applicant has provided a letter in which they state that they are currently reviewing the costs
associated with development for site servicing and land preparation and has requested a one year
extension. They anticipated that within the next year that review will be completed. In order to
allow them to complete this review and investigate the impacts with the construction costs it is
recommended that the first extension to the rezoning application be supported.
AQLV
Prepared by: Gay McMillan
/X- -
Approved by:/1'rank Quinn
GM: Public )orks & Development Services
Concurrence:
Administrative Officer
GMIbjc
-3-
4/WE 124AVE 1 4 AVL 124 AV
C11 R:mi c ___ 12
cq
L
"4'Z 70062
rN"322 323
1926 '185 CD A 116 117 14 15
154 1
hN\ P 2 730
:::::: ::
8 CL 12386
-
210
P 246278 c\11 u1P63_5l
21 1 [12 213
P 147_0 6"363 2
12345 \\ 346 LEE
P 8914 SPNW2464 10 0) Co co co o
S 1/2 C P 72069 '°89 350 206 c.4205 204 12333
12334 :
P6 083 207 P39
42 GAR APT Th P 261 2 LO \ P 12325 109 ocilO 12 13\ac14 G,15 r16
12305 - 123
P 8914 SPNW2777 It \ Is
E APT 111 112 11 id 8 7
12296 P2 132 P1938
12283 CONSRV 1 242 \p
2243
2 24
15 I 12257 w HINCI I
P 1161 I 240 0
bjt Property I PARK 12247 C 259
LMP 50617 12275 II 239 P k2134 12258 12237 C
J-~2 238 2 254 I I P 80477
APT LMP 13628 (. \. 1
LMP 35292 \._ N PARK 237 122
Remi '7- C..
04
236 235L34
12238 1 J / P42134
LMS 721 12207
\LMP21095 LMS873 'A'
P86603 I \ PR( SCH
122 AVE 12206 ] -
12191")
A LMP26249 Rem.326
52376
12184-90 R P
l
em3
Go T
12175
12150 (REC CENTRE) ii 0) RP
LMP 43240
H
(J)
LMS 4011 Parcel "A" 305 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
12157i Nt
12148 (ECRA) P 468 makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy, or
28 I C\I present status of the information shown on
C\J thismap 1
( N 12258 224 Street ! A ca L I MAPLE RIDGE 0_
ThONILL Incorporated 12, September, 1874 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SCALE: 1:2,500 MAP / V V DATE: Nov 192002 FILE: BY: CN
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor K. Morse DATE: December 2, 2002
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ1088/02
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Bylaw No. 6092 - 2002 and Bylaw No. 6091 - 2002
12258 224 St.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant is requesting rezoning in order to permit the construction of 108 apartment units under
the RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone and P-i (Park and School) zone. The P-1
zone relates to the area on the eastern portion of the site, which is identified as a Municipal Park in the
Official Community Plan. The application is being considered under Development Permit Area V to
address issues surrounding multi-family residential development for the apartment site.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6092 - 2002 be read a
first time;
That, acknowledging that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No.
6092-2002 has been considered in conjunction with the capital expenditure plan and
waste management plan, Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No.
6092 - 2002 be forwarded to Public Hearing
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6091 - 2002 be read a first time and be
forwarded to Public Hearing; and
That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading.
Registration of a Rezoning Development Agreement including the deposit of
security as outlined in the Agreement;
Amendment to Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan;
Amendment to Schedules "A" & "H" of the Official Community Plan;
A geotechnical report which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed
development;
A Statutory right of way plan and agreement for a public access walkway must be
registered at the Land Title Offlce:
Road dedication as required for 224 St. and for the pathway to provide park
access from 224 St.;
A restrictive covenant to provide for the Development Cost Charge forgiveness of
the Park component at the building permit stage must be registered at the Land
Title Office;
Park dedication for conservation purposes for the tributary of Legion Creek;
Transfer of "Park" for the neighbourhood park to the District;
A subdivision plan to create the District's "Park" site.
\
DISCUSSION:
Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Focus Architecture and Planning Ltd.
Dowco Construction Ltd.
Lot: 15, Section 20, TP 12, Plan: 116 1, NWD
Existing: Apartment District (100-250 units per net hectare), Park,
Conservation, Compact Housing (40 units per net hectare)
Proposed: Apartment District (100-250 units per net hectare), Park,
Conservation
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses:
North, East & West:
South:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Access:
Servicing:
Previous Applications:
a) Project Description:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
RIvI-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
Residential
Vacant
Vacant (one derelict building)
Residential 224th st.
Full Urban Standard
None
The site is 1.9 hectares in size and is located on 224th St., between 124' Ave. and 122nd Ave. The site is
generally flat, and is surrounded by a mix of single family homes (to the east) and higher density
residential development. The proposed development would create two four-story apartment buildings
with a combined total of 108 apartment units. The units will be serviced by an access road from 224th St.
A high-pressure gas main runs parallel to the northern property line and a tributary of Legion Creek
flows through the eastern portion of the property. The creek and 15 metres from top of bank will be
dedicated for conservation purposes. The eastern portion of the property contains an area designated in
the Official Community Plan as Public Park. Land to the south and north of the property has already been
set aside for park use, and the portion on this site will link these areas to complete the acquisition of land
required for Firefighter's Park.
The District will be acquiring this remaining portion of Firefighter's Park through Development Cost
Charge forgiveness at the Building Permit stage. A walkway will be provided through the site from 224th
St. to facilitate pedestrian -access to Firefighter's ParkAportionofthiswaikwaywiThbe achieved along
the southern property line of the subject site, and the remaining portion will be achieved when the
property to the south (12238 224th St.) is developed.
The site will be included in Development Permit Area V, which addresses the form and character of
multi-family residential development.
-2-
b) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
Schedule A & H:
It will be necessary to amend Schedule A & H to include this site into Development Permit Area V,
which addresses the form and character of multi-family housing as well as protection of the natural
environment. The site is already included in Development Permit Area XXX for watercourse protection.
Schedule B:
The majority of the site is designated as Apartment District (100-250 units per net hectare), Conservation
and Park, with a small portion along the site's northern property line designated as Compact Housing (40
units per net hectare) on Schedule B of the Official Community Plan.
It will be necessary to amend Schedule B to include the small strip on the northern portion of the site into
the Apartment District (100-250 units per net hectare) designation and to amend the conservation and
park boundaries to reflect the actual boundaries. The boundaries have been ground proofed through a site
survey and have been established through consultation with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
Development Permits:
Schedule E:
Development Permit Area XXX:
A watercourse exists on the site that has been identified for special treatment on Schedule E of the
Official Community Plan and is subject to Development Permit Area XXX for habitat protection. Prior to
any site construction, it will be necessary for Council to approve a Development Permit which addresses
the guidelines and objectives of Development Permit Area XXX with respect to the tributary of Legion
Creek. The details of the replanting scheme will be included in the permit.
Schedule H:
Development Permit Area V:
This Development Permit Area is designed to address the protection of the natural environment and
address the form and character of multi-family residential development. The main objectives of this
Development Permit Area:
• To encourage coordination in the siting, form, character and volume of multi-family development in
relation to single family residential areas
• To achieve a high quality of residential development
• To minimize visual disruption to the neighbourhood
• To provide appropriate amenities to enhance the character of the development
• To encourage siting of development and construction techniques that will not disrupt watercourses in
the area
• To retain natural vegetation where possible
-3-
The Development Permit will ensure that the proposed apartment buildings will be integrated with the
existing neighbourhood and that a transition is created between the proposed development and the mix of
high and low density housing that surrounds the site. The preliminary plans submitted indicate that the
buildings may slightly exceed the required height for the zone. This and other design details such as
building siting will be addressed through the Development Permit, which Council will review to the
issuance of a Building Permit.
Zoning Bylaw:
Both the density and proposed use are consistent with the RIvl-2 (Medium Density Apartment) zone that
the applicant is requesting for this site. The RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment) zone allows for
apartments as its principal use. The area designated as Public Park will be rezoned to P-i (Park and
School), which is consistent with the zoning of the surrounding park areas.
Advisory Design Panel:
The Advisory Design Panel raised questions in regard to the "gated" nature of the project, public access
to the development, security of the underground parking area, as well as the location and size of the
garbage and recycling area. The applicant is aware of these concerns and will be addressing them in more
detail at the Development Permit stage.
The Advisory Design Panel expressed support for the project.
Development Information Meeting:
The meeting was held at the Maple Meadows Seniors Centre on the evening of October 30, 2002. Fifteen
members of the public attended, representing approximately ii households in the area. The main
concerns expressed were: the need for the retention of trees along the creek, noise, parking during the
construction period, the impact of drainage flows on neighbouring properties, building height and
locationlscreening of garbage bins. The applicant explained how these concerns are being addressed in
the development and felt that the attendees were generally supportive of the project.
c) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has identified that all the services required to support the development
proposal do not exist on the site. A copy of that review has been provided to the applicant. It will be
necessary for the applicant to enter into a Rezoning Development Agreement and post security to provide
the deficient services prior to final consideration of the Zone-Amending Bylaw.
Otherservicing issues are-: -. - -
• A geotecimical report is required to address the bank stability of the watercourse and to determine if
any building setbacks are required to support the development proposal.
• Road dedication is required to achieve an arterial right-of-way for 224th s•
• A BC Gas right-of-way and high-pressure gas main exists on the northern portion of the site. The
applicant must obtain approval from BC Gas to work within this right-of-way prior to any on site
works taking place
• A statutory right-of-way for public access to achieve the walkway connection from 2241h St. to the
future Firefighter's Park.
The Engineering Department has indicated that 2241h St. is able to accommodate the traffic that will be
generated by this development. The portion of 224 th St. immediately north of 122 Ave is constructed to a
four lane urban arterial standard, which is the District's highest standard of urban road.
The Parks and Leisure Services Department
An area on the east side of the development site is identified as Park in the Official Community Plan.
This area will be zoned to P-i (Park and School) as a condition of zoning and transferred to the District.
The Parks Department is proposing to develop the park as a passive park with a trail network and a
pedestrian bridge across the tributary of Legion Creek.
The Parks Plan for this area has identified two pedestrian connections from 224th St. to Firefighter's Park,
as part of the park's trail system. Parks staff have been advised of the property owner's concerns and
have agreed to consider the creation of one walkway only. This connection will be 6 metre right-of-way
for public access that would be located between the subject site and the property to the south. Three
metres of the right-of-way will be achieved on the subject site, while an additional 3 metres will be
achieved when the site to south is developed. The 6 metre right-of-way width will allow for the openness,
landscaping and design required to create an inviting, comfortable and safe space for pedestrians. This
width will also make the walkway accessible to maintenance vehicles and may be used as a fire lane for
the apartment buildings. The Parks Department has identified the opportunity to create connectivity to
the walkway for the ground level apartments through the use of appropriate fencing and gates to
individual units. The property owner to the south has been advised of the District's objectives for this
pathway.
Public consultation with the surrounding neighbourhood will be required prior to the final development
of plans for the park. Approval from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans will be required with
respect to work in and around the watercourse.
Property Manager:
The eastern portion of the site is identified in the Development Cost Charge Bylaw as a Development
Cost Charge item for acquisition. The transfer of Firefighter's Park will take place through the
development process. An agreement detailing the terms and available amount of Development Cost
Charge forgiveness for the park should be registered at the Land Title Office as a condition of zoning. In
accordance with the agreement, the owner will be forgiven the Park Component of the Development Cost
Charges payable at the Building Permit stage.
d) Intergovernmental Issues:
An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any
affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of
the Act. The amendments required for this application are to Schedule B and are considered to be minor
in nature. They are required to reflect the actual boundary of a Conservation area and Public Park area,
and to redesignate a small portion of the property from Compact Housing (40-60 units per net hectare) to
match the existing designation on the remaining portion of the property (Apartment District, 100-250
units per net hectare).
It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including
referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the
School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial governments.
The amendment has been reviewed in conjunction with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste
Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact.
-5-
e) Environmental Implications:
A setback of 15 metres from top of bank has been established for the tributary of Legion Creek. The
Department of Fisheries and Oceans has approved the habitat protection boundary that will be dedicated
as park for conservation purposes as a condition of rezoning. Replanting will be required within the 15
metre conservation boundary. As part of development servicing, the applicant will have to apply to the
Ministry of Water Land and Air Protection for Section 9 approval for a storm outfall.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed development is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. It is recommended that it
be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Council grant first reading to the Maple Ridge Zone Amending
Bylaw No.6091-2002 and the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6092-2002.
£Le c C'o-&
Prepared by: Carol Nicolls
Plaming Technian
\i I)
Apoved by;.lie LPMCIP
- Directim lanning
Approved by: Frank Quinn, P.Eng., PMP -
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
CN/bjc
0 CD CD CD
3 tRem1 N N
Rem 3
P19 26 2
12385
P8914
B
12367
P
12347
2
12345
P 8914
S 1/2 C 12333
42
43
12305
P5
P 8914 I SP NW2777
E
I CD-I- 0 P1161
LMP 50617 12275
I LMP 13628
LMP 35292
Rem 1
RM- RM-3
721 12207
12238
LMS 3 J
L±Ms_873'A'
P 86603
— I lCD 347 /,r.Ii. 0) CD CD CD
'V'M1LJ49 i 350 206 205 4204 / P083 208 207 P3 I
P2612 P1 109 ,,110
CD • 13\a)14 c,15 .-16 Co N 108
CD N U) U) N N N \N U) U) N N N N
111 j112 Ln 11 ir \ 8 7 P2132 P193 8 - ' 242 \ p
SUBJECT PROPERTY \243 244 R 245 cq 241 C4 N C
12257 HINCH
240
12247 LLI 257 Ln 258 259
239
12237
I 01 PI213. -
(P80477 '12 f_255 X PARK 237
cli
I I D_1 ___ 122 .1 I I
\ Vol 7iri 236 / 235 234 233 232 / P42134
LMP 21095
LUC\ PARK P-I
123962
P 18957
154
P 38983
12386
67
P 24278
2344
2342
SP NW2464
p1
NO
N k 181 I I k I I I
l322 I323
1° CD
N
lo lo CD CF- "° e IN lC'4
Irj IN Ii- lCD CC)Lo IN IN IN IN3 N4 I P5289
N IN IN IN IN
A 116 117 1' 15 1
P 70062 Pfl85 11J
2
2380
CL
12387 J I2388 I p_2730
6 8 L J P
\ Rem. O 344
NI 1/2
of 13 cP 345
P6 51 ll E 22 213
P 1161
236O
\ 3_—y
r LEEA
5 W
•, d
U) bS RP III F U)
305 r+he Corporation of the District of
P 468 makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy or
present status of the information shown on
this map.
Focus Architecture & Planning Ltd.
12258 224 Street
CORPORATION OF lip
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE
Incorporated 12, September, 1874 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Sep 13 2002 FILE: RZ/088/02 -. - BY: RS
A LMP 26249 Rem. 326
1 P 52376
12184-90
Rem 3
12150 (REC CENTRE)
LMP 43240
4 LMS 4011 Parcel 'A"
12157 _( 12148 (ECRA)
I 28
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BY-LAW NO. 6092 - 2002.
A By-law to amend the Official Community Plan
WHEREAS Section 882of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may
revise the Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "A", "B" & "H" to the
Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community
Plan Amendment By-law No. 6092 - 2002."
Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises
known and described as:
Lot 15, Section 20, Township 12, Plan 1161, New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 638, a copy of which is attached
hereto and forms part of this by-law, is hereby redesignated as shown.
Schedule "A" is hereby amended by adding the following in correct numerical
order to Subsection (B) of Development Permit Area V in the Appendix:
Lot 15, Sec. 20, Tp. 12, Plan 1161, NWD
Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
- Lot 15, Section 20, Township 12, Plan 1161, New Westminster District - - - -
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 639, a copy of which is attached
hereto and forms part of this bylaw, are hereby designated as Development Permit
Area V (12) on Schedule "H".
• Page2
- Bylaw No. 6092-2002
5. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Designation By-law No. 5434-1996 as
amended is hereby amended accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D., 200.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D., 200.
READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D., 200.
READ A THIRD TIME the day of - , A.D., 200
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED the day of , A.D.,
200.
MAYOR CLERK
r v
I 18.9
4Rem 3 _________ P 18957!='1I p
1 826 2 \ P 700621 p 7 P 52 89 1 01___ Aol 116 11772385 I
N i P2730
7U C'l154
P 8914 I P 38983
1 2 72388
8 /2385 12380
j 8 I I
0.624 ha. I 67 I \ Rem - N" 344 86—
72357 P 24278 I N 1/2 72377 15.2
\ (.1/2353
P 14J30 72347 1/2344 of 13 \ \ 345
2 1 I'2J_a__EP72QW P 1161 \ 346 LEE AVE. I
CLOO
\ LEE AVE.
12345 I \' RW 39660\ )Rw 39660
. IIc 0)' I P 8914 I SP NW2464 1 \ EP 66 5 I lh tt)l . S 1/2 C . I 1-11 II I
123 .555 ha P 72069
EP 66084 48349 I 350 lI I 206 I20
,It 12334 P 6L0831 2Q 207 97
cli
42 RW 677 EP 46997I
U), , P 261 2 225 I 109 I11OI12J 13\ 14 I15
01)
12325
A
43 I 1.214 ha I I cU CNI
1230 P 75480 108
123 AVE. 123 AVE
I P 8914 I SP NW2777
111 I112 io 8
E _______________
22Q P $132 P 1958EpJ45584
0.623 ha. 242' \P 4 /2283
RW 183 —1
-- ---- 1241 \
Z,P 2840 15 112257
P 1161 1240 I 0.761 ha 1
~~j.914 ho 42247 I 257 25 LMP 50617
12275 1239 12258 7'237 15.2_________
LMP 13628 1'227
25
0) . iiill
<,80477 CL. 238 256
LI) ,'c,
LMP 35292 PARK LI) 1237
a. "A" N 2217
Rem 1 1.593 ha /11 I RW 80478-1)
LMP 21095
236
/ II 12207
r"22OL6~
LMS3721
S 873_________'A'PARK— RW 81544/ P 86603
M23 7J7'I
12238
1.274 ho
20.1
3.135 ha
r)F
EF1
I LMP 26249! Rem. 326
LMP 26402 P 52376 c'J
LMP 24829 —
LMP 26401 12784-90-
- r_) 0'
U) 1217
LMP 43240 — — 1
a. N w a. LI)
MAPLE RIDGE OTFiCIALtOUMUNITY PLAN AMENDING
Bylaw No. 6092-2002
Map No. 638
From: Compact Housing(40 units per net hectare),
Conservation and Park
To: Apartment Conservation V/I Park
MAPLE RIDGE
Incorporated 12 September, 1874 1:2500
6lt209I
IP63I/2350
351III 2hTolh;
I II21 1 21
I li a.I il1
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING
Bylaw No. 6092-2002
Map No. 639
PURPOSE: TO DESIGNATE AS DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT AREA v(12)
omb= som *k E
MAPLE RIDGE
Incorporated 12 September, 1874
A
1:2500
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BY-LAW NO. 6091 - 2002
A By-law to amend the text and Map "A" forming part
of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6091 - 2002."
That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 15, Section 20, Township 12, Plan 1161, New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line is hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment
Residential) and that portion shown hatched is hereby rezoned to P-i (Park and School),
as shown on Map No. 1289, a copy of which is attached hereto \ and forms part of this
bylaw.
Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200.
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200.
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200.
• RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D.
200.
MAYOR CLERK
I-
3 _________ P 18957J --i 'M l 'i22323
1
14 ~8Rem
26 2 \P 70062! I P ie.g P 52 89 '10 I o 12385 _______ Ao 116 117 14 154 I 1 2 I 7(t) I
' P 8914 P 38983 I 12387 12388 NI Q
I I 6 8 CL B 12385 I 12379 12380
0.624 ha. 57 Rem. -o'
/2J6 I P 24278
1/2-744
I N 1/2 \ 12371
\ 12363f
15.2
12347 of 13 \ P
14130 2 1 P_72ZQ P 1161 _________
12345
i2J. -
\ 346 LEE AVE. /
35 RW 39660 - LEE AVE. RW 39660
P 8914 SP NW2464 \ EP 66 5 IIC 0,
S 1/2 C .
/233 I .555 ho P 72069
EP 66084
/348
6L083
350lI 0, 206 205
C11 j12J34 ______________________ ______________ 2Q 207
C11 42 I I RW 677 P 261 0 EP 2 4699
____
00
12325 109 110 12 I15 I
43 A j 1.214ho
13\1
/2J0.' I P 75480 108 / 123 AVE. 123 AVE.
P 8914 1 SP NW2777
I111 I112 E I ____________________________________ P 2132 19 58E45584
10 9 \ 8
0.623 ha. /22831 242\ P44
2! N 4244 I
- 241 15 112257
L ------ 0.761 ho - P 1161
-
1240
1.914 ho /12247 25 7 !258 LMP 50617 12275
___
1239 I p
/2J7
______
15.2L 1238 256I255
LMP 13628 P 80477 1227
LMP 35292 PARK 122 "A" Rem 1 1.593 he RW 8047&i) / I I ( 236 T 12207 12238 / II 3721 I LMS 873 'A' J 21095
RW 81544/ 1 P 86603 PARK
d 12206 I
1.274 he
63 /2191 J I A LMP 26249 Rem. 326 3.135 he
26402
LMP 26401 P 52376
12184-90 (.'J
Rem 3 ___.__
It) 1217. LMP 24829 0, r) _UJ /2150 (REC CENTRE) 1
20.1 0 N ° 1 LMP43240 L,J CO
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMEND1NG
Bylaw No. 6091-2002
Map No. 1289
From: RS-1(One Family Urban Residential)
To: RM-2(Medium Density Apartment Residential)
and P -1(Park and School) shown hatched
MAPLE RIDGE
Incorporated 12 September, 1874
A
1:2500
P63 51i IN
I
EF 6d8 2101
l 211212
I I l
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor K. Morse DATE: December 22, 2003
and Members of Council FILE NO: DP/043/03
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Development Permit
Northwest corner of 240 Street & 104 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A Development Permit XXX application has been received for the above noted property in support of
a development plan for subdivision adjacent to Spencer Creek. As required under Development
Permit XXX a permit must be approved by Council and the required environmental security deposited
with the District, prior to any on-site works being undertaken.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Municipal Clerk be authorized to sign and seal DP/043/03 respecting property located
on the northwest corner of 240 St and 104 Ave.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Zoning:
Surrounding Uses:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Access:
Genstar Titleco Limited
Genstar Titleco Limited
Lot 372, D.L. 406, Plan LMP35030, NWD
Single Family Residential (18 Units Per Net Ha)
RS-lb (One Family Urban (medium density)
Residential)
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Vacant
Residential
Slatford Street
b) Project Description:
A Development Permit application has been made in support of a development plan for subdivision
application (SD/043/03) for four lots backing onto Spencer Creek and a large remainder parcel which
will redevelop in the future.
103
c) Environmental Implications:
The site has a watercourse identified on Schedule 'E' of the Official Community Plan and is included
into Development Permit Area XXX that was established for the preservation and protection of the
natural environment. A Development Permit is required under Development Permit Area XXX for all
alterations of land, subdivision activity or building permits as applies to residential commercial,
institutional and industrial development within 50 metres of a watercourse.
Security must be posted in accordance with Council Policy for Performance Security for
Environmental Protection to ensure that the Development Permit Area Guidelines are met.
Staff has reviewed the Guidelines for development established for Development Permit Area XXX
and feel that the applicant has satisfied these as follows:
Watercourse Protection Area Establishment
Watercourse protection areas are to be established in accordance with their habitat value and the
potential impacts proposed by adjacent development. The District ofMaple Ridge, the
Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Ministry of Water, Air and Land Protection must
endorse the proposed watercourse protection boundaries.
The watercourse protection areas are to be dedicated where possible into public ownership for
conservation purposes.
The boundaries of the watercourse protection areas are to be physically located on the ground by
a B. C.Land Surveyor prior to site disturbance.
Temporary barrier fencing is to be installed adjacent to watercourse protection areas prior to any
construction activity and shall be replaced with permanent post and railfence upon development
completion.
All lots must provide the required minimum lot dimensions as set out in the Zoning Bylaw
exclusive of the watercourse protection boundaries.
• The setbacks from Spencer Creek have already been established using past practice for
this system which is 15 meters which is at variance from the District Streamside Setback
Assessment Map. The four lots which front on to Slatford Street are outside of the
habitat protection area and, as a condition of subdivision, a restrictive covenant for
habitat protection will be required over the remainder parcel. It is anticipated that the
remainder will redevelop at a future date and that Park land dedication will be achieved
at that time.
Erosion Control
All work is to be undertaken and completed in such a manner as to prevent the release of
sediment to any ravine, watercourse or storm sewer. An erosion and sediment control plan that
involves implementation prior to land clearing and site preparation and the careful timing of
construction is to be provided.
Silt fence should be erected to prevent the movement of silt into the watercourse protection area
prior to any disturbance to the soil on the site.
-2-
Cutting and filling adjacent to watercourse protection areas is to be kept to a minimum
incorporating appropriate structuralfihl material and blending graded areas with natural slope,
as supported by the Hillside Policies of the Official Community Plan.
. A Plan has been provided for the entire site that:
- Includes a temporary siltation fence along the rear yard area of the new lots; and
- Provides for the lot grading
- A Sediment Control Plan
Ve2etation Management
Natural vegetation is to be retained wherever possible to ensure minimal disruption to the
environment and to protect against slope failure. Land clearing adjacent to the watercourse
protection areas is to be restricted to a phased construction schedule.
Habitat restoration landscaping of all bare or sparse riparian areas within the watercourse
protection area may be required. Vegetation species shall be native of the area and be selected
for erosion control and fish and wildlife habitat values.
• A significant amount of vegetation will be protected within the watercourse protection
area.
Storm water Management
H. Stormwater outflows to the stream or leave area shall have water quality and erosion control
features so as to minimize their impacts on fish habitat and in compliance with the District's
storm water management plans.
• The applicant has proposed a stormwater management plan that addresses the District's
stormwater management requirements.
Mon itorin
12. The implementation of required environmental mitigative measures as designed and their
maintenance is to be monitored by a qualfled environmental monitor.
Environmental monitoring will be a key element of the development of this site. Terra
Planning Ltd. will be the environmental monitors for the project and will ensure
performance meets with the standards established by the Watercourse Protection Bylaw.
Monitoring will be conducted by Terra Planning Ltd. and will occur daily during
construction and heavy rainfall events, with periodic/weekly monitoring at all other times
to ensure compliance with the permit.
-3-
Performance Security:
13. As required under the District 's Performance Security for Environmental Protection Policy, an
envi ronmental performance security will be collected prior to the issuance of the perm it to ensure
compliance with tenns and conditions described above.
A security totaling $6000.00 will be required for 4 lots which back on to Spencer Creek.
Interdepartmental Implications: N/A
CitizenlCustomer Implications:
There are no road works required in support of the subdivision of the land as Slatford Street is already
constructed. It is, however necessary, prior to on-site works in support of a building permit that the
Development Permit be issued.
1) Financial Implications:
A refundable security totaling $6,000.00 will be required for 4 lots which back on to Spencer Creek.
CONCLUSION:
The applicant has provided the information as set out in the Council Policy for Environmental Protection.
It is recommend that DP/043/03 be approved.
\\\'
Prepared by: Gay McMiIlan
Plannine Technician
Approved 'ne i erinI , CIP
- - Dir ctor nning
4fl
—5611/(
Approved by Frank Quinn, P.Eng., PMP
GM: Pub
1
lic Works & Development Services
Con currence: JI.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
GM/bjc /
-4-
-J .5
2
2119 "19
.1 4 5 288
6
287 F '
0. o. 10554
10543 14 591 9 1054
Iss 0
10536 7°366'19
4)
0) 0 10527
Q 351 (253 40
C,)
C,)
0521 -341 257 1
1059 10526 350 '2
1051 25
10516
3
C'J
10511 362 349 '18 42
09
363 348 10510
25 jQ502
364
260
'p14 —J
Is, '365 347 -.345
k 1
'c) 346
'3
LO
-(2
"(2
q5;C3 10
0
21 ,; 269
10423
z)895
216 0
270
275 274 273 272 271
I
69
EP 16557
PARK
LMP 51537
=1
ECT PROPERTY
10515 LMP 48014
3
P 10921
Rem 372 6
10456 9
LMP 35030
U)
P22 14 750
04
Rem7
10420
-j a-
a
0 U- I—
(I)
3
P60014
PcI.M A RemO
10386
B
(J130089E) P21 9 NWP7139 P 13554
10389 A P13554
PcI. 1
RP 9100
2A
SCALE 1:2,500
Distnctot
Pitt Meadows N
I LMP35030, LOT 372
(KANAKA RIDGE - PHASE_10) o
__ CORPORATION OF J: THE DISTRICT OF
Distnct of \ AiblOn ''I .
Langley \ MAPLE RIDGE
Incorporated 12, September, 1874 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Nov 24, 2003 FILE: DP1043/03 BY: PC
-
MEND •'\\\ \/ /) )\\
yTO
: :
CITIALLCQOUNDctTOI ' '\1 \ , 1/ N
r:'y' \ \ \ //\ •2
/ /'" j
.,
- I
' iL• :1
:"PF:i•/
I
- —
CC
-.
•S SWALE
4FRACTOR'S swA
tC110N or n. \S 55• ' 55
•:i!:! j
165
R E U C E D I
I. AT 004 I. —0 Sf01 lot 11 1040 MUST N Co...0dS I. M. .100,
T•05s to Oil .1000 Cl tf• ?I0? 04 II,. lot.
10,'. .001. .04 Iwo 304+.IT
Al w04n
Owl.. .0.54. lOHool
.0 1. 3. -1 lMU.o ,.......n_..
t, ..
Awif I ol4.
rEz
'. ±± :* LIi II .4. w.. no.. .10.04 I. Jwt to 00.4 030
To
'.4.... 4+ 4+ 0 019.0.0.4 0. NIH 1 5w.ld _••
104th AVENUE
Cf. AwAw. .to• .01 ...flq 4.o.I wTo4 IN, •
- - - 605TAR - CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
00 ---- 00,4000
C.
OC4NTNIT
UR BANSYSTEMS LOT GRADING PLAN
_- - 00403 40140 . '.0.14 CCI • '..i KANAKA RIDGE ESTATES
PHASE 10 334 07010244 O'i! jjq
9 PLAN 2958 n( g ( 14 Ptt *Wt DI W6IX fl( _ ( 901 t t , . * ..0 .i UM s.-w ,
wt or OR ( 0D.Swo tL mwv PIMM 4 onmm U PIT mom. CITRUS in ',, ' 'V \ I • ' \ \ %J) wwr m n i M
. . mw ic i o.n ART ni TIMES 00 111. . SURNT UICIR AS SIGN *.
* Ifl 5 1t
i o,wi tt m vu nt
' i m p \ ) /
- Is i
m
t .& UIPC
Ile r
IV
119
\\777 i /
Pee ISO
\19,
/21,
PAR
tn
IL
5:
PERF. M III wm cu:~~
STORM
104th AfNU(
= — 1 - ---
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
-------------------_-
—
—— URBMISYSTEMSP SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
• 0 6 ' KANAKA RIDGE ESTATES - • 0*500 6*5 *5*68 5555*5 LOSS • 555500* [112 tac7 PHASE 10 I33400102O1
EKE TCH FL A N SH 0 WIN C
THE L IMI TE OF THE
50 ME TEE SE TEA CK L INE
OCA/I 1:7000 /
I Al L /)/0 JANCF/ A/W IN Ml
V
\\ /
330
-
-
/
/ DISTRICT LOT 406 371 I
\
;/..// / REM.
(
V
-:
7 y7'
374 /411 GROUP
PCL.A//
\ / // / /375
268
- 269
270
I 'GW P/AN
H
/
/
Lai
\ .1 . REDUCED
1 .113716 . T .
104 AVENUE
272 1 271
MURRA Y & ASSOCIA TES
207- 1244 82Ad A VENUE
VJW JE9
(604) 597-9, 89
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor K. Morse DATE: December 29, 2003
and Members of Council FILE NO: DP/062/03
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Development Permit
24207 102 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A Development Permit XXX application has been received for the above noted property in support of a
development plan for subdivision adjacent to a tributary to Spencer Creek. As required under
Development Permit XXX a permit must be approved by Council and the required environmental
security deposited with the District, prior to any on-site works being undertaken.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Municipal Clerk be authorized to sign and seal DP/062/03 respecting property located at
24207 102 Avenue.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Existing:
Zoning:
Existing:
Proposed:
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Existing Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Previous Applications:
b) Project Description:
Cavalier Homes Ltd.
Paul Kaczan
Lot 2, Section 3, Township 12, Plan 15283, NWD
Compact Housing (40 Units Per Net Ha &
Conservation
RS-3 (One Family Rural residential)
R-3 (Special Amenity Residential)
Conservation
Residential
Residential
Residential - -
Residential
Residential
RZ/062/03, SD/062/03
A development permit application has been made in support of a development plan for subdivision
application (SD/062/03
'70y
c) Environmental Implications:
The site has a watercourse identified on Schedule 'E' of the Official Community Plan and is included
into Development Permit Area XXX which was established for the preservation and protection of the
natural environment. A Development Permit is required under Development Permit Area XXX for all
alterations of land, subdivision activity or building permits as applies to residential commercial,
institutional and industrial development within 50 metres of a watercourse.
Security must be posted in accordance with Council Policy for Performance Security for Environmental
Protection to ensure that the Development Permit Area Guidelines are met.
Staff has reviewed the Guidelines for development established for Development Permit Area XXX and
feel that the applicant has satisfied these as follows:
Watercourse Protection Area Establishment
Watercourse protection areas are to be established in accordance with their habitat value and the
potential impacts proposed by adjacent development. The District ofMaple Ridge, and the
Department of Fisheries and Oceans must endorse the proposed watercourse protection boundaries.
The watercourse protection areas are to be dedicated where possible into public ownership for
conservation purposes.
The boundaries of the watercourse protection areas are to be physically located on the ground by a
B.C. Land Surveyor prior to site disturbance.
Temporwy barrier fencing is to be installed adjacent to watercourse protection areas prior to any
construction activity and shall be replaced with permanent post and rail fence upon development.
completion.
All lots must provide the required minimum lot dimensions as set out in the Zoning Bylaw exclusive
of the watercourse protection boundaries.
• The setbacks from the tributary to Spencer Creek have been established and will be
dedicated Parkiand in conjunction with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the
Municipality as part of the rezoning application for this site. In the case of this
development a road will run adjacent to the habitat protection area with lots fronting it.
Erosion Control
6 All work is to be undertaken and completed in such a manner as to prevent the release of sediment to
any ravine, watercourse or storm sewer. An erosion and sediment control plan that involves
implementation prior to land clearing and site preparation and the careful timing of construction is
to be provided.
7. Silt fence should be erected to prevent the movement of silt into the watercourse protection area
prior to any disturbance to the soil on the site.
-2-
Cutting and filling adjacent to watercourse protection areas is to be kept to a minimum
incorporating appropriate structuralfihl material and blending graded areas with natural slope, as
supported by the Hillside Policies of the Official Community Plan.
. A Plan has been provided for the entire site that:
- Provides for the grading and direction of overland drainage to an existing siltation
control pond. The overland direction is away from the creek and there is no need to
provide a temporary silt fence.
- Shows how siltation will be controlled and the limit of clearing boundary, which is
outside of the habitat protection boundary.
Vegetation Mana.-ement
Natural vegetation is to be retained wherever possible to ensure minimal disruption to the
environment and to protect against slope failure. Land clearing adjacent to the watercourse
protection areas is to be restricted to a phased construction schedule.
• A significant amount of vegetation will be protected within the watercourse protection
area, which is dedicated as park.
Habitat restoration landscaping of all bare or sparse riparian areas within the watercourse
protection area may be required. Vegetation species shall be native of the area and be selected for
erosion control and fish and wildlife habitat values
• No restoration is required as there will be no works taking place in the watercourse protection
area.
Stormwater Management
Stormwater outflows to the stream or leave area shall have water quality and erosion control
features so as to minimize their impacts on fish habitat and in compliance with the District's
storm water management plans.
• The applicant has proposed a stormwater management plan that addresses the District's
stormwater management requirements.
Mon itorin2
The implementation of required environmental mitigative measures as dèigneáOndtJie7r
maintenance is to be monitored by a qual/Ied environmental monitor.
• Environmental monitoring will be a key element of the development of this site. Environwest
Consultants Ltd. will be the environmental monitors for the project and will ensure
performance meets with the standards established by the Watercourse Protection Bylaw.
Monitoring will occur daily during construction and heavy rainfall events, with
periodic/weekly monitoring at all other times to ensure compliance with the permit.
-3-
Performance Security:
13. As required under the District 's Performance Security for Environmental Protection Policy, an
environmental performance security will be collected prior to the issuance of the permit to ensure
compliance with terms and conditions described above.
A security totaling 10,500.00 will be required for the 7 lots which front on to the watercourse.
Interdepartmental Implications:
Department of Fisheries and Oceans:
The setbacks for the tributary to Spencer Creek have already been established in conjunction with the
Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Municipality and will be dedicated as Parkland as part of the
rezoning of these lands.
Citizen/Customer Implications:
Until Council has authorized a development permit the applicant will be unable to begin site preparation for
any works within 50 meters of the watercourse.
1) Financial Implications:
A refundable security totaling $10,500.00 will be required for 7 lots, which front on to the watercourse.
CONCLUSION:
The applicant has provided the information as set out in the Council Policy for Environmental Protection. It
is recommended that DP/062/03 be approved.
\\ \
Prepared by: Gay McMillan
Approved by:: Frank Quinn, P.Eng., PMP
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J.IL. (Jim) Rule
C,#iief Administrative Officer
IKE
BCP3 3946
45
3736 35
34 1L 33 1___
102 B AVE.
22728 2930 [3
27
f3139
___
I 102AAVE.
LP1 7 BP 13
Rff87Tl6 :141j1j181920
23
0) U-,
03 0
BCP ¶lO
PARK I PARK
I 10349
I.-.
61ffl.0342
30 o, P CL 1519 10345
10339 C/)
3 32
SUBJECT PROPERTY I 10333 C'.I - 10336
10327 10330
34 10321 10324
03201
PARK 0318 2.
P35g18 10312
C'4 0299
go
:::
co
:::: )
00
I849Tsois±j
TO co
co
102
37 38 39 40J41 42 43 44 45 1 1011
LP 295 Go
U) ,' L'"P 329q C') I I
127 282930311 32333435 36 1 J122j12 12
I I —J I Ii (-"I \_0 - - - - 4,
102
E
245.35'
2
P 15283
L 18W92O21222324221
[44 6 7 i
----
C 3139
iihi;16LiLi 2
BCP 1010
iml
I j ..
. ..—
I I I
102 AVE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13J
LMP 35918
31 32 W1/2of2 E1/2 012 -
24207 102 Ave.
0
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF .0 6i), =Mtl
MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE
Incorporated 12, September, 1874 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Dec 19, 2003 FILE: DP/062/03 BY: RO
98765
I BCP 3139
3 4
•
• ••'j.vY
/ r '
C Pc/C PcIr 37
P/on 14864 ERon 10359 Ref.Plan 9473 47579
DUr _
a 7463
- PARK
PARK Plan LA1P35918
4279
AVENUE oi 103
71 .4LOTS SUBJEC1 X/4(/4J 53 [9DPXXX
45 • 18407 m2 / /20 1' 22 . á4A 26
KAYOnr LANE
16 15114 13 12 11 10 9
.43. 42 41 40 39 J8 : -48
• . 4. . .•
Na V4 m Z24 02 EM M2 224.Aa 21
an £18 j £18 I are I 8.18 £18 8.25 law
- 1028 AVENUE 27u'vrIr 102B AVENUE
• Plan BCPJ1J9 . . . .
33 32 ...S 131 30 29 28 27123456i8
22D m2 . 37
•.. - - 945 I a2d &fl I 8.2
LANE LANE
i 171.71 I 1 •• . . ' I ... '1• I
20 21!. 122 2324 25 26 4i.25.3-Fet2 27
°fa'i 528
cIq
1024 AVENUE . . 1024 AVENUE
14
I .
I LI jo.. • . . - •• . . . ••
11 10 9 8 7 6 5
- ,
LANE LANE
21
3 4 _I.
• 9(706'18 . 74.77 i/f1L/
9170618 • 7477 . FIVIlember 14,2003 SCALE 1:750 102 AVEI'ILJE
Wade &AssociatesUd. PROPOSED SUBDV1SION OF 54ST245.5 FEET OF LOTI,2
AfopIL- Ridge and Mission 463-4753 SEC.3 TP.12 N. W.D. PLAN .15283 AND LOT 46, SEC. 3 TP.12 N.W.D. PLAN BCP 3139
PcL'G' C Pdr Pdr 37
Ex.PIon 20434 Am 144 EzJI, 100 ftfAm 9473 Am 0519
mw
i LF18 - UMIT OF CLEARING
UNE
/07ERMURSF
400
!SUBJEcTARE4I
?1 iL 11_ 1029 A . . .
MTA71ON IZZILAN r\ IPII A1j ' 1028 A%P94UE
J-P-#
37
I... . ...-...
33 32
[1
r-==
.\ LANE
- - - 77 I CZA
22 2)J 24) m ±cLLJ1ILtJi L'
OE _R*n2. 102AA!NLEDied c / Nj 15a3 ,
I \. if!]
1110 /
MAWN LM
D.K. BOWINS & ASSOCIATES Inc. _________________________________
DEVELOPMENT NDV1R/fl!
SCALES 1:2000 PERMIT XXX Dws. 1OF 1
VERT. - MAPLE RIDGE
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor K. Morse DATE: December 22, 2003
and Members of Council FILE NO: DP1047/03
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Development Permit
13819 232 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMI'vIARY:
A Development Permit XXX application has been received for the above noted property in
support of the first phase of subdivision which is adjacent to Anderson Creek. As required under
Development Permit XXX a permit must be approved by Council and the required environmental
security deposited with the District, prior to any on-site works being undertaken within 50 meters
of the top of bank of the watercourse. Other servicing works in support of this subdivision that
impact on watercourses have been approved by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and are
not part of this permit.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Municipal Clerk be authorized to sign and seal DP1047/03 respecting property
located at 13819 232 Street.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: D. K. Bowins & Associates Inc.
Owner: Silver Maple Developments Ltd.
Legal Description: SE1/4, Section 32, Township 12, Except: Firstly:
Part subdivided by Plan 3871, Secondly: Parcel
"A" (RP6047), Thirdly: Parcel "B" (R.P. 6048),
Fourthly: Parcel "C" & "D" (R.P. 7680) and Road,
NWD
OCP:
Existing: Eco Clusters, Agricultural
Zoning:
Existing: CD-3-98 (Apartment, Residential, Park and
School), A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
Surrounding Uses
North: Rural Residential
South: Rural Residential
East: Rural Residential
West: Blaney Bog
?065--
Existing Use of Property: vacant
Proposed Use of Property: residential
Access: 232 Street
Previous Applications: RZ/23/96 & SD/047/03
Project Description:
A Development Permit XXX application has been made in support of the 51 lots being created
under subdivision application (SD/047/03) for the above noted property. The large remainder
parcels of the first phase (Lot 52 & 53), will require application for Development Permit XXX
when they are further subdivided. The north east portion, of this 51 lot phase of development, is
adjacent to Anderson Creek and requires approval from Council for a Development Permit XXX
prior to any on site works taking place within 50 meters of the watercourse. Other servicing
works, have received approvals from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans for creek crossing
and storm outfalls and are not subject to this approval process. This application will deal with
the 51 lots being created in Phase I of the subdivision for lots adjacent to Anderson Creek and a
tributary to Anderson Creek.
Environmental Implications:
The site has a watercourse identified on Schedule 'E' of the Official Community Plan and is
included into Development Permit Area XXX which was established for the preservation and
protection of the natural environment. A Development Permit is required under Development
Permit Area XXX for all alterations of land, subdivision activity or building permits as applies to
residential commercial, institutional and industrial development within 50 metres of a
watercourse.
Security must be posted in accordance with Council Policy for Performance Security for
Environmental Protection to ensure that the Development Permit Area Guidelines are met.
Staff have reviewed the Guidelines for development established for Development Permit Area
XXX and feel that these have been satisfied by the applicant as follows:
Watercourse Protection Area Establishment
Watercourse protection areas are to be established in accordance with their habitat value
and the potential impacts proposed by adjacent development. The District of Maple Ridge,
the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Ministry of Water, Air and Land Protection
must endorse the proposed watercourse protection boundaries.
The watercourse protection areas are to be dedicated where possible into public ownership
for conservation purposes.
The boundaries of the watercourse protection areas are to be physically located on the
ground by a B.C. Land Surveyor prior to site disturbance.
-2-
Temporary barrier fencing is to be installed adjacent to watercourse protection areas prior
to any construction activity and shall be replaced with permanent post and railfence upon
development completion.
All lots must provide the required minimum lot dimensions as set out in the Zoning Bylaw
exclusive of the watercourse protection boundaries.
• The setbacks from Anderson Creek have been established and in conjunction with the,
Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Municipality and will be dedicated as
Parkiand as part of subdivision application (SD/047/03).
Erosion Control
All work is to be undertaken and completed in such a manner as to prevent the release of
sediment to any ravine, watercourse or storm sewer. An erosion and sediment control plan
that involves implementation prior to land clearing and site preparation and the careful
timing of construction is to be provided.
Silt fence should be erected to prevent the movement of silt into the watercourse protection
area prior to any disturbance to the soil on the site.
Cutting and filling adjacent to watercourse protection areas is to be kept to a minimum
incorporating appropriate structuralfihl material and blending graded areas with natural
slope, as supported by the Hillside Policies of the Official Community Plan.
• A Plan has been provided that:
Includes a temporary siltation fence along the Park boundary; and
Provides for the grading and direction of overland drainage to a siltation control
pond.
A Stormwater Management Plan has been prepared for the entire site by Kerr
Wood Leidal.
Vegetation Management
Natural vegetation is to be retained wherever possible to ensure minimal disruption to the
environment and to protect against slope failure. Land clearing adjacent to the watercourse
protection areas is to be restricted to a phased construction schedule.
Habitat restoration landscaping of all bare or sparse riparian areas within the watercourse
protection area may be required. Vegetation species shall be native of the area and be
selected for erosion control and fish and wildlfe habitat values.
• A significant amount of vegetation will be protected within the watercourse
protection area, which will be dedicated as park. As well, there will be amenity
areas provided in road ways and on some of the back yards of the proposed lots.
-3-
Storm water Management
Storm water outflows to the stream or leave area shall have water quality and erosion control
features so as to minimize their impacts on fish habitat and in compliance with the District 's
storm water management plans.
• The applicant has proposed a stormwater management plan prepared by Kerr
Wood Liedal that addresses the District's stormwater management requirements.
This plan proposes to reduce impervious areas by using low impact development
techniques and by providing water quality and detention facilities.
Mon itorin
The implementation of required environmental mitigative measures as designed and their
maintenance is to be monitored by a qualfled environmental monitor.
• Environmental monitoring will be a key element of the development of this site.
EVS Consultants, will be the environmental monitors for the project and will ensure
performance meets with the standards established by the Watercoüise Protection
Bylaw. Monitoring will be conducted by EVS Consultants and will occur daily
during construction and heavy rainfall events, with periodic/weekly monitoring at
all other times to ensure compliance with the permit.
Performance Security:
As required under the District 's Performance Security for Environmental Protection Policy,
an environmental performance security will be collected prior to the issuance of the perm it to
ensure compliance with terms and conditions described above.
• A security totaling $31,500.00 will be required for 21 lots which back on to
Anderson Creek and a tributary to Anderson Creek.
Interdepartmental Implications:
The Department of Fisheries and Oceans have approved the setbacks for habitat protection and
have issued approvals for servicing works adjacent to watercourses in support of the first phase
of subdivision.
Citizen/Customer Implications:
Until Council has authorized a development permit the applicant will be unable to begin site
preparation for subdivision SD/047/03
-4-
0 Financial Implications:
A refundable security totaling $31,500.00 will be required for 21 lots which back on to Anderson
Creek and a tributary to Anderson Creek.
CONCLUSION:
The applicant has provided the information as set out in the Council Policy for Environmental
Protection. It is recommend that DP1047/03 be approved.
.. •\'
Prepared-by: Gay McMillan
_—\-- (J\
4ppro0'Q\ Jane !iCI1IMCP, MC!P
Approved byf Frank Quinn, P.Eng., PMP
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J. L.i(Jim) Rule
Chif Administrative Officer
GMfbjc
-5-
I I
SUBJECT PROPERTY
District of
Pitt Meadows Silver Valley
•,1,
--.-
N District of
Lan le .., ,. 'I - 1horrhili -
SCALE 1:5,500
Ri
13819 232 STREET
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICTOF
MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE
Incorporated 12, September, 1874 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Dec 4, 2003 FILE: DP1047103 BY: PC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4 ,.
4
4
19
(
I
1.3
PHASING owns
PHASE
S.,
: LOTS 5U3JE.CT
To tP
Portrall Homes
Sliver Maples Siormwaler
Management Concept Plan
Legend
Phase I Boundary
- Site Boundary
15m Riparian Setback Line
Proposed Showhomes
Notes:
External Site Mapping Source
District of Maple Ridge
tuI
100 0 toO
Scale in Mntres
Project No Dale
2041002 August 2003
Proposed
Silver Maples
Subdivision
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: Jan. 14/04
and Members of Council FILE NO: DP/080/03
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Development Permit
12031 230 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The subject property is within Development Permit Area XXXVII. An application has been
made for a Development Permit for the reconfiguration of a drive through/parking area for Tim
Hortons on 230 Street and Dewdney Trunk Road.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Municipal Clerk be authorized to sign and seal DP/080/03 respecting property
located at 12031 230 Street.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP:
Existing:
Zoning:
Existing:
Surrounding Uses
North:
South:
East:
West:
Proposed Use of Property:
Access:
Previous Applications:
Urban Design Group Architects Ltd. (General)
Richard Kolodziej
Sandhurst Properties Inc.
Lot 39, Section 20, Township 12, Plan 32509
NWD
Service Commercial
CS-i (Service Commercial
Residential
Dewdney Trunk Road/Residential
Residential
Future Service Commercial Property
Commercial
230 Street
RZ/080/03
Project Description:
The development proposal will provide for additional off-street parking and an improved drive
through aisle arrangement that will allow for greater vehicle stacking than presently exists for the
Tim Hortons site. The existing access driveway will be relocated further to the north, which
should help to alleviate traffic congestion at the Dewdney Trunk/230 Street intersection. The
Development Permit will govern the landscaping and interface with existing residential
development north of the site.
Planning Analysis:
The subject site is located in Development Permit XXXVII which was established to address the
form and character of service commercial development adjacent to properties designated for
residential use in the Official Community Plan. The guidelines for this Development Permit
Area are as follows:
Building and structures should be located to ensure safe traffic circulation and access and
adequate on-site parking.
• There will be no changes to the existing building. The reconfiguration of the drive
aisle and parking area will help to provide safe traffic circulation.
The character of service commercial uses should be enhanced by landscaping of substantial
proportions around property lines, particularly adjacent to residential development, to ensure
a compatible and smooth transition to abutting residential uses. Where possible, native
vegetation should be retained to enhance the landscape planting by providing variety in
maturity and scale.
• A landscape plan has been presented which provides for an acoustical fence and
planting adjacent to the residential component.
Design and construction of buildings should account for maximum sound attenuation
between service commercial and residential uses. To ensure that noise generated on the site
is addressed in the most appropriate manner, Council may request that a noise attenuation
study be prepared.
• There will be no changes to the existing Tim Hortons building. The purpose of this
Development Permit is to expand the existing on-site drive aisle and provide for some
additional parking space to help improve present on-site maneuvering and alleviate
the congestion on 2301h Street and at the intersection of Dewdney Trunk Road and 230
Street.
• A report has been prepared by an acoustical engineer which presents a
recommendation for the construction of an acousticalfence. The report also proposes
that this will lower the anticipated noise levels from the new parking/drive aisle by
approximately 5 decibels from the present noise level.
• The order box system is also being changed to an Accuorder System. This system uses
a computer screen to show the customer the order as placed, thereby eliminating the
order taker from repeatingit ib,custnmer.itJsanticipnied that is will red,i,g' the -
-2-
noise from the speaker box by 50-75%. The speaker box is also being located to face a
more westerly position, again reducing the noise level to the existing residential use.
High intensity lighting and signage should be avoided when adjacent to residential property.
Lighting and signage shall be designed so as to have no direct source of light visible from the
public right-of-way or adjacent land in residential use.
. There is no additional lighting required.
Mechanical equipment, drive-through uses, service or car wash bays, restrooms vending
machines, unenclosed storage and public telephones should be oriented on the site to face
away form adjacent residential zones. Whenever possible, these uses should not be visible
from an adjacent residential property.
• The acoustical fence that is being constructed will be designed to obscure the line-of-
sight from adjacent residences (bedroom windows) and will provide a visual barrier to
the residential use to the north of the site.
Particular attention should be made to the image presented to the streetfront and adjacent
residential properties.
• The landscape plan provides for the continuation of planting along the 230 Street
frontage to match the existing planting on the Tim Hortons site.
A well defined pedestrian access to any accessory commercial use will be provided from the
public sidewalk
• Design will ensure that pedestrian use is given precedence over vehicular use. The
existing Tim Hortons site has provided pedestrian access from the sidewalk to the
building.
Architectural finishes and building design should be compatible with those used on buildings
in adjacent residential neighbourhoods. Building design will mimic recent residential
construction or the heritage character of a neighbourhood. Exterior finishes should b e
wood, brick, natural stones or other materials of warm appearance. Substantial area of
concrete should be avoided. Expanses of solid wall and glass are unacceptable.
• There will be no changes to the existing building.
New buildings adjacent to existing small scale buildings such as houses should be designed
to provide visual interest whilst protecting the privacy and livability of both properties.
• There will be no new buildings.
1) Citizen/Customer Implications:
It is anticipated that the improvements to the drive through use will help to alleviate some of the
congestion on 230 Street and at the intersection of 230 Street and Dewdney Trunk Road.
-3-
g) Financial Implications:
There will be two trees added to the municipal Street tree inventory on completion of this project.
The costs associated with maintaining these trees will need to be included in a subsequent
operating budget.
A refundable security deposit, based on 2 '/2% of the construction cost, is required.
CONCLUSION:
The improvements to the on-site circulation will help to alleviate congestion on 230 Street and at
the intersection of 230 Street and Dewdney Trunk Road. It is recommended that the
Development Permit be approved.
C
Prepared by: Gay McMiIlan
Approve9y{ \j P ringMCP, MCIP
JNr-eictor
Approved by: / Frank Quinn, P.Eng., PMP
GM: Public Works & Development Services
J. L. (Jim) Rule Concurrence:
Chief Administrative Officer
cirvvbjc /
-4-
102 109
148 8 11940 ('3 11937
101
11932 110
11931
11930 82 147 11927
Q.
-
11920
100 111 146 11913 —
11922 11921 6 -
Rem 66
11940
69
65 70
11930 11931
64 71
11920 11921
452 454 - 13 12155
F226
.. ¶2175
7228
274 16 21 366 2 12147
229 230 231 232 233 I 234
- 12173 12170 12169
275
451 5587
12
P44292 I 12164 15 22 l2165 w
21
12169
12155
/_L.\216 253 273 276 12166 368 ~ 458 g 10
0 12155 2154 12163 .c' 448 1213 235 252
14 23
___ 23068 236 251 ( ) 12145 2144
254 272 277 12163 12152 Cl g 369 121A
N 12161 Q AVE. 447 12145 2150 1 CD 3 24 370 0
12135 2140 12135 2125 12140
12159 - LM
237 250 255 271 278 12141 _________
_____ 0 371 446
° 12 ________ C'4 C'J 0) 12157 415
:238 g 249 256 270 279 12127 25 W 44 414 413
6 12125 2130 12125 2124 372 I 416
0.. 12130 12155 0
239 °- 248 257 269 ,.: 280 C/) 12148 3I
73
12115 12120 12115 12114
C. 26
443
_____ 03 12153 W C4 12116 ¶2148 417 PE
(1) 258 268 281 10 - 442
240 247
12107 12151
441 '
12105 12110 12105 2104
C'4 82 1
241 246 259 267 282 32 375 .. 418 ,
12095 12094 12096 2094
¶2149
12073 12106 a. 'i 440
12085
419 420 421 4
2084 8 377 438 F
10
243 [244 245 263 264 E 266 283 P 15849 0. 12147 P6 938
- 12067 31 12145 .' 437 436 435 434
12087 12084 I 284
112057 12084 378
PURDEY AVE. 2074
- P20969 23oi
)12064 2 30 a.2301i
0 00 310
______ 12056 384; CHER
61 262 313 1 2I i 4 309,38 112088
I PJ8429 I P 450\
12041
( 2 pp
383
P
0
3g 1 12036 P 292 I 'I
a. 12031 112022
3 0
11 381 382 385 386 P... 388 39
P2891 P66 8 6693
P7651 P450 1 1 LMP 1505 _______ Rem
WI 312 1311 317 P49271 4 330
329
LMP41199 BcPb273
_____
Rem
ofB 1 P47120 P17941 P49271
P 84291
DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD
00 4Rem
LM
, -
215 216
w P 8011 P574 1 P565 0 Cl) a.
—
-. P 68237 Rem. 220 229 230 231 223 224 218
ii PcI 1 217 PcI. 1 EP 10384 z I _________--ZI P34984
P4388 — -
151 150 955
11661153 158 1157 15 57'54 153 152 ,/ (N44 82
CD IN 82
1 _____ FULLER AVE. 149 43 a.
11949 189
- - _______________ 11950 1632/11978 P 46838
A PthMeadowsLV/[,//
I SUBJECT PROPERTY
/ \ 12031 230 ST.
/ \ , CORPORATION OF
4_4 0 ts THEDTRICTOF
N Incorporated 12, September. 1874 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SCALE 1:2,500
DATE: Dec 23, 2003 FILE: DP-80-03 BY: TM
E,NNTIT'IC, LOT'
-- SITE CREW leVi
TUEWLOT'
I
SITE CREW 0-C T.'L
E.'iSTllAO LOT
SIZE AREA
2.V3 IT I000TOINEO LOTWI ,
Till I-IORTOTIS CREW SIT,
LOT COVERAOE 1
PURKINC REOUNEED If STALLS
RESTAURANTS lIFER -I SEAT61
F4RKI1IC FRCVIOEO AT STALLS .h-11
7 '! I1i1II1
—
-DECORATIAC15 AT ECAP J,IAX
TSP ETIX CR
SVE
5T4T5TIc5 "CARP'-'-- FEEl EJEEE ll - -_-- 1 T 1IITITTI I NEW LOT -. "TCAILEP------- .L I 1J LLIILI I PLAN
I I ill If FE' - "1 If III LIII! I --
l CT WIlLIE //'
IA LATTICE IIXRIIWJI&I - - - - - - -
I I AL PL.,EiPTI 41 L )T
EtA
- L LOT NEIl LOT
oq lET "F rr I nut 2 KIM
PlO :\'E15-81 . - p eorro pro—.----
Ti I El El EXISTNC.
EYISTIf LOT 1 I roprocoronc CL ELEV4TION OF NEW COUSTIC FENCE T'TETEJDOARC I j / EIVIE, APPE.FSS Z'NE'I ETF1'E'TE: ' - I AlL CIXCO 011 I / r EXISTEET. Finn: PflAf.T 'WEll PIrCA B; J!±,1. IT laoCoAT$a1mpEaTIp ,R,,ANI PPE'MEMJSOARO I 'CO,IXR TO 11 , A6D PT NENERI -'.--- - C:fr'TIQI I 3 ALL lAATNE TO 11 OTPPIEGOLOU1IEX LEC.UL OENCRLPFIOTI- LOT S ECEPT --'-----
PLAN ITOON, SECTV':'I IC IF IT EElWNEIE PAD &.00 A ._iFO ±2± P. FL 1,00 PELOCATE 11152H4
54,45n li-lW SO'] 351 0' 00
EiSTIl 10111 REl NEW L0TI - - -
-
:::E
::
4 - I
ACOUSTIC PENCE
10
4.00
l " I)
ELTISTT'IO t-' H 2 4TI ACITy, __
I I '
-'
oz
'
00
D000ETI POLE,PCC&P2ETLIllAT
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Variance Permit
26025 103 Ave.
DATE: January 14, 2004
FILE NO: VP/030103
ATTN: Committee of the Whole
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to postpone the requirement to upgrade and construct roads fronting a
parcel of land that is the subject of a rural subdivision application. The upgrading is proposed to be
postponed until such time as either suburban or urban residential development takes place.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Municipal Clerk be authorized to notify qualifying property owners that approval of
VP/030/03 respecting property located at 26025 103 Avenue will be considered by Council at the
February 10th, 2004 meeting.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context
Applicant:
Owner:
Legal Description:
OCP Existing:
Zoning Existing:
Surrounding Uses
Existing Use of Property:
Access:
Previous Applications:
Requested Variance:
b) Project Description:
Bheemdev Meetarbhan
Bheemdev Meetarbhan & Linda D Holenski
Lot 38, Section 1, Township 12, Plan 7166, NWD
Urban Reserve
A-i (Small Holding Agricultural)
A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
A-i (Small Holding Agricultural)
103'd Avenue
RZ/030/03
To postpone the upgrading on 103' Avenue, 104 th
Avenue and 2600' Street until such time as either
suburban or urban residential development takes place.
The subject site was recently rezoned from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to A-i (Small Holding
Agricultural) to permit the future subdivision of the subject site into two lots. One lot will contain the
existing residence and the remainder portion is to be consolidated with the neighbouring lot to the west.
The subject site is bounded by three roads, only one of which (103' Ave.) is constructed to a rural
standard across the frontage of the south portion of the lot. The remainder portion of 103111 Avenue, 104th
Avenue and 260th Street have been dedicated in the past but not constructed.
70-7
Planning Analysis:
The Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Services Bylaw 4800-1993, requires that all highways
within, or immediately adjacent to a proposed development or subdivision be provided with services in
accordance with Schedule "A". It will be necessary for Council to waive the construction requirements set
out in Schedule "A" for the component of the road that extends from the existing driveway access on 103 w
Avenue, 260th Street and 104th Avenue.
These works would include storm drainage and asphalt paving over a constructed road base.
The subject site is located within the Thornhill urban reserve designated for future urban development on
the Official Community Plan. The proposed subdivision is consistent with Official Community Plan Policy
27 which states:
27. Policy: The Thornhill area is designated Urban Reserve, as noted on Schedule "B", to
accommodate future urban expansion. The minimum parcel size for subdivision of land
designated Urban Reserve is 2.0 hectares.
As this reserve area is targeted for urban development in the long term, planning for a particular
development pattern based on proposed land use designations and related road systems in the area have not
been contemplated at this time. For this reason it is recommended that the requirement to upgrade existing
roads for this subdivision be postponed.
Interdepartmental Implications:
The Engineering Department has reviewed this application and supports the request for the variance.
CONCLUSIONS:
It is recommended that Council approve a Development Variance Permit to waive the highway construction
component of the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw for 103rd Avenue, 2601h
Street, and 104th Avenue, adjacent to the subject site.
Prepared by: Bruce McLeod
Technician
7::~~ 6~1/ .
Approved by: prank Quinn, P.Eng., PMP
GM: Public Works & Development Services
chief Administrative Officer
BMcLibjc
-2-
SUBJECT PROPERTY
104 AVE.
0011 X"~511e-~
P31O
P 7166
P 7166
38 33
Aof4
I- Cl)
0 34 / / (0
/32
N /
P7166
/\35
31
36
P7166 P7166
37
15 30
P7166
fit
26025 I03AVENUE
L.\ 1_
N
7' jmhI (11" Uicorporatedl2 September, 1874 PNNING DEPARTMENT
SCALE 1:2,500
River DATE: Dec 4, 2003 FILE: VPIO3O/03 BY: PC
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: December 30, 2003
and Members of Council FILE NO: E02-010-072
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Traffic Signal Installations - 2004 Program
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The installation of traffic signals at intersections is a common request from citizens. As part of the 2003
Safer Cities program, a review and warrant analysis of the top 20 unsignalized intersections (based on
accident analysis) was performed to determine the relative safety, need and priorities for traffic
signalization in Maple Ridge. Through this analysis, intersections were ranked on a priority basis.
Ranking of intersections is useful for the prioritization of signal installations and for responding to
customer requests. Municipalities also use ranking systems to maximize the safety return on taxpayer
investments and as a form of demand management. This report provides Council with a schedule of
signal installations and the relative priority of intersection signalization needs for 20 intersections.
The ranking is not static, and as conditions change, the analysis is reviewed and updated. New
intersections may be added in response to updated information.
RECOMMENDATION:
That this report is submitted for information.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
There are currently 27 signalized intersections in the District. New signals are installed typically
based on predetermined criteria. In 2003, through the Safer Cities program, accident data was
made available for the first time to be included in the calculation of warrants. In addition, one-
time funding assistance was provided by ICBC to count traffic volumes and analyze signalization
needs.
This report provides Council with the current Capital Works Program (CWP) schedule for signal
installations and the traffic signal priorities for the District's traffic systems. In addition, the
scheduling of the intersections looks at the intersections in isolation and does not necessarily look
at the operational impacts on the area. It is important that further work be done on specific
intersections so that a signal installation does not result in system problems elsewhere. This will
be done as part of the annual capital works business planning process.
Traffic Signal Installations
Traffic signals are constructed to control the assignment of vehicular or pedestrian movements at
locations where potentially hazardous conflicts exist or where passive devices (e.g. signs,
markings) do not provide adequate control of traffic. Generally speaking, traffic signals are
installed at intersections and pedestrian signals are installed along busy street segments.
By providing alternating right of way to various traffic movements, traffic signals control a large
degree of traffic flow and can operate to the advantage or disadvantage of the vehicles or
pedestrians they control. Consequently, the proper analysis, determination of appropriateness,
application, design, installation, operation, and maintenance of traffic signals is critical to the safe
movement of traffic at specified locations. In most cases this is also expected to increase the
traffic flow capacity of the intersection.
Conversely, unjustified, poorly designed, improperly operated, or inadequately maintained traffic
signals can cause safety issues, excessive and unnecessary traffic delays and reduced intersection
capacity. In addition, unnecessary and unwarranted signals tend to increase delay, may contribute
to certain types of accidents, and result in the inefficient and untimely use of public funds (ITE,
1982).
While the functional objective of signal timing is to alternate the right of way among the various
phases, this has to be designed in such a way as to provide for the orderly movement of traffic,
minimize average delay to vehicles and pedestrians, reduce the potential for accident-producing
conflicts and maximize the capacity of each intersection approach. Unfortunately, these desirable
attributes are not always compatible. Accordingly, it is necessary to exercise engineering
judgement to achieve the best possible compromise among these objectives once a signal is
installed.
Criteria for Installation of Signals
Warrants
To determine when a signal is required, the standard practice is to perform a warrant analysis at
an intersection. Warrants for traffic engineering are a set of standard criteria used to define the
relative need for and appropriateness of traffic signals. These include:
• minimum vehicular volume,
• interruption of continuous traffic,
• minimum pedestrian volume,
• accident experience, and
• a combination of warrants.
Safety and Operation
However, just because a warrant is met does not mean that a signal should be installed.
Satisfaction of a warrant is not a guarantee that the signal is really needed (ITE, 1982).
In general. signal installation should either:
• improve traffic operations without impacting traffic safety,
• improve safety without negatively impacting traffic operations, or
• improve both safety and traffic opeationa.
Industry practices are that if it appears that both safety and operations are negatively impacted by
a traffic signal, the installation would be questionable and other alternatives should be pursued.
District's_Objectives
Besides the use of industry accepted warrant analysis, another primary objective of the District's
traffic engineering section is to promote traffic safety through uniformity in the design process
and operational aspects of traffic signals. The need for basic uniformity and standardization is
becoming more pronounced with the increasing demand on existing roadways and increased
public expectations for traffic signal installation. Traffic signals must be designed and installed
to permit the driver to see, recognize, understand the message, and take the appropriate action
quickly and safely. Uniformity serves to reduce drive confusion and the occurrence of last-
minute hazardous manoeuvers, thus improving traffic operations and decreasing accident
potential.
Current Signal Initiatives
In 2003, Council approved the replacement of all signal heads to 300-mm diameter signal heads
from 200 mm with LED bulbs to increase visibility and enhance traffic safety at intersections.
Study Analysis
In addition, in 2003, as part of the Safer Cities Program, a study was prepared by CTS Ltd. a
traffic engineering firm to perform traffic volume counts and warrant analysis at a number of
intersections. The list of intersections was based on safety analysis of unsignalized intersections
and the study analyzed the intersections in terms of whether signalization was warranted as well
at the relative ranking of intersections for signal consideration (if required).
Table 1 in Appendix 1 shows the relative priorities for signalizing the 20 intersections studied.
This ranking is based on both warrant analysis, safety operation analysis and anticipated demands
from development.
The following three intersections were ranked relatively high based on warrant analysis alone:
• 224 Stat Brown Ave
• 128Aveat216St
• 216 St at 121 Ave
However, operational and safety analysis conclude that further study should be undertaken on the
overall impact of signal installation of these locations. That work will commence in 2004.
Scheduling
The scheduling of signal installations is based on the priorities as shown in Appendix 1 - Table 1,
but also on the inclusion of demands, development impacts, anticipated public safety or
environmental needs as well as other investment considerations such as timing of third party
investments.
b) Desired Outcome:
The purpose of this report is to update Council on the 2003 intersection analysis and planned
traffic signal installations for 2004-20 10.
Strategic Alignment:
The Corporate Strategic Plan directs that municipal and infrastructure be protected and managed
through the preparation of appropriate plans. Traffic signal analysis is an important component of
system planning. In addition, the Corporate Strategic Plan directs that the District will maintain
and enhance a multi-modal transportation system to provide citizens with safe. efficient
alternatives for the movement of individuals and goods. Engineered traffic signals are key
components in a safe transportation system.
Citizen/Customer Implications:
Traffic signals provide clear right of way assignments at key intersections for customer (vehicles,
pedestrians and cyclists) safety. Maple Ridge residents and users of the Major Road Network
expect that the investment in the network be maintained to provide safe, reliable and efficient
transportation of goods and people using various transportation modes.
Interdepartmental Implications:
The Engineering and Operations departments work together on the installations and operation and
maintenance of traffic signals.
I) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The 2004-2008 Capital Plan incorporates the planned installations for 2004 future Capital Work
Projects and will incorporate updated intersection analyses.
CONCLUSIONS:
As part of the 2003 Safer Cities program, a review of intersections was performed to determine the
relative safety and need for traffic signalization for the top 20 unsignalized intersections (based on
accident analysis). As a result of the analysis and part of the District's annual capital program, signals
will be installed in 2004 at the intersections of 207 Street at River Road and 240 Street at 102 Avenue.
Future performance data collection, analysis, and monitoring will be required to maintain the components
of the Safer Cities program to guide the effective management of the District's Highway network and
traffic systein.
I
Prepared by: —Andrew Wood, MEng., PEng.
Muuicipal En r
Approvedibv: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng., PMP
/ General Manager, Public Works & Development Services
Concurrence: J4. (Jim) Rule
ye
AW/mi
APPENDIX 1
The following table 1 lists in order of relative priority (though warrants may not be met) the most
accident prone un-signalized intersections that were analyzed in 2003. Priority 3-17 intersections
do not currently meet warrants for signal installation. However, the priority of the intersections
relative to each other using a warrant analysis and anticipated traffic demand and transportation
planning is listed in the table.
Table 1 —Intersections for signal installations as listed by relative priority
Priority Road Name Cross-street Current CWP schedule
1 207 St River Rd Warranted and scheduled for 2004
2 240 St 102 Ave Warranted andscheduled for.2004
240 St 104 Ave 2005 - based on anticipated traffic
demand
4 Dewdney Trunk Rd 236 St tbc * (2006)
5 224 St 124 Ave tbc * (2007)
6 128 Ave 216 St tbc * (2008)
7 240 St 112 Ave tbc * (2008)
8 232 St Abemethy Ave tbc * (2009)
9 232 St 128 Ave tbc * (2009)
10 203 St 123 Ave tbc * (2010)
11 River Rd Laity St Not scheduled
12 203 St Thorne Ave Not scheduled
13 Lougheed Hwy 225 St Not scheduled
14 116 Ave 232 St Not scheduled
15 River Rd 216 St Not scheduled
16 River Rd Steeves St Not scheduled
17 Burnett St 1 116 Ave Not scheduled
* to be confirmed by future analysis
Intersections for additional study
224 St Brown Ave Additional study required
Lougheed Hwy 223 St Additional study required
216 t -
The 3 intersections identified for additional study will be analyzed in 2004.
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: January 7, 2004
and Members of Council FILE NO: 5 340-20
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Inclusion Into Sewer Area "A"
Property Located at 23791 132 Avenue - RZ/061/02
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A petition has been submitted to the Clerk's Department requesting that the parcel legally and civically
described as: Part NE 1/4, W. 285.9 Ft. of Lot B, Section 28, Township 12, Plan 15402, New
Westminster District (23791 132 Avenue) be included in Sewer Area "A". In response to this valid
petition, a by-law is being introduced for three readings.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the report dated January 7, 2004 be received, noting that it is reported therein that the
petition to include the property located at 23791 132 Avenue in Sewer Area "A" is sufficient and
valid;
and further, that Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and Loan
Authorization Amending By-law No. 6190 - 2004 be read a first and second time, and that the
Rules of Order be waived and Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and
Loan Authorization Amending By-law No. 6190 - 2004 be read a third time.
DISCUSSION:
Background Context:
As a requirement of rezoning application RZ/061/02 this parcel has to be included in Sewer Area "A".
Citizen/Customer implications:
The owners are responsible for all costs and there will be no direct cost to the District.
Intergovernmental Issues:
After third reading is granted, this by-law will require the approval of the Deputy Inspector of
Municipalities prior to final adoption of the by-law.
d) Financial Implications:
Upon adoption of this By-law, the District can legally bill for the annual sewer rate.
s Department
---,
Reviewed by: /;fe~X Fryer,
Approved bV Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng., PMP
General Manager Public Works & Development
ConcurrenCe: J ih Rule
Administrative Officer
/kk
Att.
2
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BY-LAW NO. 6190 - 2004
A By-law to extend Sewer Area "A" within the
District of Maple Ridge
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, pursuant to Maple Ridge
Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and Loan Authorization By-law No. 2486 - 1977,
established Sewer Area "A" within the boundaries of the Municipality;
AND WHEREAS, the Council has received petitions from property owners for the extension of Sewer
Area "A" and deems it expedient to extend Sewer Area "A".
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in open
meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A"
Sewerage Works Construction and Loan Authorization Amending By-law No.
6190 - 2004".
That Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and Loan
Authorization By-law No. 2486 - 1977 as amended be further amended by
adding to Section 1, the following words:
"and also shall include all those portions of:
• Part NEI/4, W. 285.9 Ft of Lot B, Section 28, Township 12, Plan 15402,
New Westminster District of Maple Ridge
(23791 132 Avenue)
as shown boldly marked on the map attached to the By-law and marked as
Schedule "A".
That the parcel noted in Paragraph 2 above, of this by-law shall bear the same
charges as those properties in the original Sewer Area "A".
READ a first time the day of , 2004.
READ a second time the day of , 2004.
READ a third time the day of , 2004.
APPROVED by the Deputy Inspector of Municipalities the day
of 2004.
RECONSIDERED and adopted the day of 1 2004.
MAYOR
CLERK
Attachment: Schedule "A"
Schedule "A to Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and Loan
Aiithnrizatinn 1men1inn Ry-Thw NC) 6190 - 2004
AVE.
RemB
— 23 24
18
... EL
132 AVE.
PROPOSED AREA TO BE INCLUDED INTO SEWER AREA A
EXISTING SEWER AREA A
PROPOSED ADDITION TO SEWER AREA A I \- t' /7' 1 I
VP4 1.Z7—
CO:C1790RATION OF ci
SCALEi
Ii1 W;W'MIlii DATEi
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: January 9, 2004
and Members of Council FILE NO: 5340-20
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: COW: PW&DS
SUBJECT: Inclusion Into Sewer Area "A"
Property Located at 2098 1/83/85 123rd Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A petition has been submitted to the Clerk's Department requesting that the parcel legally and civically
described as: Parcels "C" and "D", Portion of Parcel "B" (Reference Plan 1723) Except: Part Subdivided
by Plan 6532, District Lot 243, Plan 24823E, New Westminster District (20981/83/85 123 Avenue) be
included in Sewer Area "A". In response to this valid petition, a by-law is being introduced for three
readings.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the report dated January 9, 2004 be received, noting that it is reported therein that the
petition to include the property located at 20981/83/85 123 Avenue in Sewer Area "A" is sufficient
and valid;
And further, that Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and Loan
Authorization Amending By-law No. 6192 - 2004 be read a first and second time, and that the Rules
of Order be waived and Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and Loan
Authorization Amending By-law No. 6192 - 2004 be read a third time.
DISCUSSION:
Background Context:
In order to provide service to a proposed new residence on this property, the property owiers have
requested sewer connection to the line running along 123rd Avenue. Policy 9.02, relative to Sewer
Area "A" extension into the Agricultural Land Reserve, states that properties abutting an existing
lateral sanitary sewer line shall be permitted to connect thereto.
Citizen/Customer Implications:
The owners are responsible for all costs and there will be no direct cost to the District.
Intergovernmental Issues:
After third reading is granted, this by-law will require the approval of the Deputy Inspector of
Municipalities prior to final adoption of the by-law.
1710
d) Financial Implications:
- Upon adoption of this By-law, the District can legally bill for the annual sewer rate.
Prepared by: artKirk-'
Cl.s-èpartment
Reviewed by:Fry , .Eng
ffierk
Approved by. Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng., PMP
Generai Manager Public Works & Development
'-
Concurrence: J.L. (
Ikk
Attachment
m) Rule
Administrative Officer
2
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BY-LAW NO. 6192 - 2004
A By-law to extend Sewer Area "A" within the
District of Maple Ridge
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, pursuant to Maple Ridge
Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and Loan Authorization By-law No. 2486 - 1977,
established Sewer Area "A" within the boundanes of the Municipality;
AND WHEREAS, the Council has received a petition from a property owner for the extension of Sewer
Area "A" and deems it expedient to extend Sewer Area "A".
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in open
meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A"
Sewerage Works Construction and Loan Authorization Amending By-law No.
6192-2004".
That Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and Loan
Authorization By-law No. 2486 - 1977 as amended be further amended by
adding to Section 1, the following words:
"and also shall include a 6000 square foot portion of:
Parcels "C" and "D", Portion of Parcel "B" (Reference Plan 1723) Except: Part
Subdivided by Plan 6532, District Lot 243, Plan 24823E, New Westminster
District (2098 1/83/85 123 Avenue)
as shown boldly marked on the map attached to the By-law and marked as
Schedule "A".
That the parcel noted in Paragraph 2 above, of this by-law shall bear the same
charges as those properties in the original Sewer Area "A"; save that this parcel
which is in the Agricultural Land Reserve shall pay charges based on General
Improvements and six thousand (6000) square feet only of the land on which the
improvements sit.
READ a first time the day of
READ a second time the day of
READ a third time the day of
APPROVED by the Deputy Inspector of Municipalities the day of
RECONSIDERED and adopted the day of
MAYOR
CLERK
Attachment: Schedule "A"
•
TTI 1
I
--
- -
-.
(1 j
- I 1.
I - •. _L. i:-.
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: January 14, 2004
and Members of Council FILE NO: E06-017-005.7
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Expansion of curbside collection area and 2004 Recycling Charges
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The District provides recycling services to residents of Maple Ridge through the operation of a recycling
depot and curbside collection of recyclables.
The 2004 Business Plan identified the provision of curbside collection of recyclables for additional
residential areas, east of 240 Street (ref. attached Schedule A). As part of the 2004 budget. Council
approved increases for recycling charges to reflect increased costs.
To implement these Business Plan items, an amendment to the current Maple Ridge Recycling Charges
By-law No. 4655-1992 is required. The attached By-law (No. 6193-2004) incorporates the expanded area
and the changes in fees.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Maple Ridge Recycling Charges Amending By-law No. 6193-2004 be read a first and second
time and that the rules of order be waived and Maple Ridge Recycling Charges Amending By-law
No. 6193-2004 be read a third time.
DISCUSSION:
Background Context:
The District provides services for the collection of recyclables through a fee for service agreement with
Ridge Meadows Recycling Society (RMRS). RMRS operates a recycling depot and provides weekly
curbside collection of recyclables for a number of residents in Maple Ridge.
Aspartof t-he-Di•st-riets- annuaIEusiness-Plann-ing -process, t-heRMRS presents-it-sanrrualBtisinessPianto
Council and the public. As part of the 2004 Business Plan, the curbside collection of recyclables will be
provided to some areas east of 240 Street and program charges to properties will be increased to reflect
increased costs.
Desired Outcome:
This report seeks Council's approval to amend the current Maple Ridge Recycling Charges By-law No.
4655-1992 to allow for the expansion of the provision of curbside collection services and to reflect the
2004 program charges. Typically, the program charges for a given year are included in the Annual
Financial Plan By-law. To improve the coordination of the charges and the expansion area, this report and
By-law incorporates the changes in one report.
Ct tl
Strategic Aligmnent:
The Corporate Strategic Plan directs that the District will provide high quality municipal services to our
citizens and customers in a cost effective and efficient manner. The District's program is intended to
provide a high quality service to residents of Maple Ridge.
The Strategic Plan also directs that the District will promote individual and community responsibility for
the stewardship of natural resources. The recycling program is targeted at promoting and supporting the
stewardship of wastes and recyclables.
Citizen/Customer Implications:
RMRS have been and will continue placing print advertisements to alert the public to the new curbside
collection areas. RMRS will also be distributing blue boxes during the week of January 19 and will
commence the expanded collection area during the week of January 26.
The By-law amendment will also allow the charging of the 2004 charges to the new areas as well as
existing customers.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
The current program involves a number of different departments including the Engineering, Finance and
Clerks departments.
Intergovernmental Implications:
This program is in keeping with the Regional Solid Waste Management Plan that has been adopted by
Council.
I) Financial Implications:
The changes in fees also reflect market conditions for the resale of recyclable materials.
Charge Type
Depot Charge
Single Family Residential
Duplex
Triplex
Townhouse
Boarding House (Including Rest Homes)
Condominiums
Apartment
2003 2004 Change
$24.24 $24.72 $0.48
$24.92 $25.42. $0.50
$24.92 $25.42 $0.50
$24.92 $25.42 $0.50
$24.92 $25.42 $0.50
$24.92 $25.42 $0.50
$24.74 $25.23 $0.49
$24.74 $25.23 $0.49
CONCLUSION:
The District provides recycling services to residents of Maple Ridge through the operation of a recycling
depot and curbside collection of recyclables. In 2004, the area for curbside collection of recyclables will
be expanded to allow greater access for residents to municipal services. In addition, recycling charges will
reflect increased program costs.
V.
Prepared by: Andrew Wood, MEng., PEng. Co-analysis b'-Jacob Sorba, C.G.A.
Municipal Engineer Director of Finance
Approved by: VFrank Quinn, MBA, PEng., PMP
General Manager, Public Works and Development Services
Concurrence: JL. (Jim) Rule
,Chief Administrative Officer
AW/mi
Qzaftw.~~__.
MAPLE RIDGE lZS.,fl.S,. W74
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BY-LAW NO. 6193-2004
A By-law to further amend Maple Ridge Recycling Charges By-law No. 4655-1992 as
amended
WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to further Maple Ridge Recycling Charges By-law No.
4655-1992 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
This By-law shall be cited for all purposes as " Maple Ridge Recycling Charges
Amending By-law No. 6193-2004'.
"Maple Ridge Recycling Charges By-law No. 4655-1992" as amended is further
amended by:
Deleting Section 4 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
"4. "The annual recycling charge will be in the amount of Twenty-
four dollars and seventy-two cents ($24.72) per taxable property." If
services to properties commence part way through the year the
charges will be pro-rated for the portion of the year that the services
are provided.
Deleting the words General Manager: Operational Services in Section
5 and replacing it with the words "General Manager: Public Works
and Development Services or his designate'.
Deleting Section 6 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
"6. The amount of the annual curbside collection charge will be as
follows:
Single Family Residential
Duplex
Triplex
Townhouse
Boarding House (Including Rest Homes)
Condominiums
Apartment
$25.42 per dwelling unit
$25.42 per dwelling unit
$25.42 per dwelling unit
$25.42 per dwelling unit
$25.42 per dwelling unit
$25.23 per dwelling unit
$25.23 per dwelling unit
If services to properties commence part way through the year, the
charges will be pro-rated for the portion of the year that the services
are provided.
Repealing Schedule "A" and in its entirety and replacing it with
Schedule "A" attached hereto and forming part of this bylaw.
Inserting the following as Section 11:
"11. If any provision of this Bylaw is declared invalid or
unenforceable, or set aside by a court of competent jurisdiction, it
shall be severed, and the remainder of this Bylaw shall remain in
force and effect.
READ a first time the day of 2004.
READ a second time the day of 2004.
READ a third time the day of 2004.
ADOPTED the day of 2004.
MAYOR CLERK
MALCOM
GOLD
P±=s _
FOREST
PEN /EARI
_ S
I File: engO1 mxd
Jan 15, 24
TAK RD
L !1f RI VER () -,
co
oel
cJ
MAPLE RIDGE CURBSIDE
COLLECTION CHARGES /
BY-LAW 61 93-2004
SCHEDULE'A' 102 AVE
CURBSIDE COLLECTION CHARGE AREA
116
112 AVE
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: JAN. 06, 2004
and Members of Council FILE NO: T21-212-003
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN:
SUBJECT: Adjustments to 2003 Collector's Roll
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The B.C. Assessment Authority has revised the assessed values for the 2003 Collector's Roll through the
issuance of Supplementary Roll 11/2003. The Collector is required to make all the necessary changes to
the municipal tax roll records and report these adjustments to Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
The report dated Jan. 06, 2004 is submitted for information.
DISCUSSION:
(a) Background Context:
One folio is affected:
1. A Residential Class property has had the assessed value of improvements reversed to accurately
reflect the condition of the property and its taxable value for 2003.
(Municipal tax decrease of $ 231.24)
(1) Business PlanlFinancial Implications:
There will be-a-decrease of$ 877.69 in taxes receivable of which the municipal share is S 231.24
\\
Prepared by: SiIvRutledge
Supervisor of Revenue &Collections
Approved by: Jacob G. Sorba, C.G.A.
Director of Finance
Approved by: Ful Gill, B.B.A.; C.G.A.
q Gener I Manager: Corporate & Financial Services
Concurrence:/ J.L. (Jim) Rule
/
Chief Administrative Officer
/sr
q3/
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: January 12. 2004
and Members of Council FILE NO: 0320-01
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Tag Day Soliciting
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
To grant permission for Tag Day soliciting at the entrances to local businesses, as requested in the letter
dated January 5. 2004 from the Royal Canadian Air Cadets, 583 Coronation Squadron.
It should be noted that approval by Municipal Council does not preclude the necessity for the applicant to
receive permission from the administration offices at the respective business locations for the use of their
premises.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the request, dated January 5, 2004, of the 583 Coronation Squadron of the Royal Canadian
Air Cadets for permission to conduct Tag Day soliciting at business entrances throughout the
District of Maple Ridge on Friday, February 27, 2004 and Saturday, February 28, 2004 be
approved.
DISCUSSION:
Background Context:
Pursuant to Section 25 of the Highway and Traffic By-law and Section 532(1) of the Local
Government Act, soliciting for donation (door-to-door canvassing, tag days, etc.) must be approved by
the Municipal Council by way of a resolution.
Citizen/Customer Implications:
Tag days are the means by which non-profit organizations such as the Air Cadets raise funds for
special programs and extracurricular activities that would otherwise not be possible.
CONCLUSIONS:
In order to meet the requirements of Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By-law No. 3 136-1982 and the
Local Governnzent Act, Council's approval is required for all requests for soliciting for donation
Prepared by: Diana Dalton
Clerk's Department
Approved by: Paul Gill, B.B.A, C.G.A, F.R.M
General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services
- ------ ---
Concurrence: JIL. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachment
'732-
Q2L
583 CORONATION SQUADRON, RCAC
12101-224th STREET
MAPLE RIDGE, BC, V2X 6117
604-463-9388
At-
RFcpjv.
50' January. 2004 iAN 1 2 200t
Dear Madam Mayor and Council
Air Cadet Tag Days
The 583 Coronation Royal Canadian Air Cadet Squadron are planning a Tag Day drive in order to raise
funds for cadet activities and for the operation of the squadron on the following dates and times:
Friday 27th February from 5:00PM to 9:00PM and,
Saturday 28th February from 9:00AM to 5:00PM.
We are seeking permission to allow the Cadets to stand outside local business in order to canvas patrons for
funds to help meet our operating costs.
Please note that when the Air Cadets are on premises, they will be in Canadian military cadet uniform and
covered by Air Cadet League of Canada liability insurance. Cadets will be instructed to conduct themselves
in a mature, polite and courteous manner. As established in prior Tag Day drives, an older, experienced
cadet will be paired with a younger new cadet. All cadets will also be instructed not to obstruct the flow of
traffic in and out of the facility. The Tag Day drives are a major means of fundraising for our organization
and your permission to allow us to use local businesses is vital.
The 583 Squadron appreciates your involvement in the community and looks forward to a positive response.
Please call me with your confirmation at your earliest convenience.
Yours truly,
Tina Kirkpatrick
583 Squadron Chairperson
tinakirk@ca.ibm.com
6044660569 (H)
604-297-3078 (B)