The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2004-04-27 Council Meeting Agenda and Reportsd Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETING A GENDA April27, 2004 7:00p.m. Council Chamber MEETING DECORUM Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be reprimanded. Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.org The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 OPENING PRA YERS Pastor Ed Bradley, High Way Church 300 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 301 Ridge Meadows Minor Hockey Association, Bantam B-i Rustlers, Provincial Champions 302 Financial Plan Presentation by the Director of Finance and consideration of items 808-811 400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 401 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of April 13, 2004 402 Minutes of the Public Hearing of April 20, 2004 403 Minutes of the Parks & Leisure Services Commission Regular Meeting of March 11, 2004 Page 1 Council Meeting Agenda April 27, 2004 Council Chamber Page 2 of 8 500 DELEGATIONS 501 Braden Kolbe, Outdoor Skateboard Park 502 New Westminster & District Labour Council, Day of Mourning Presentation 503 Community Crash Reduction Challenge, Frank Letkeman-Manager, ICBC Maple Ridge Claim Centre 600 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 601 Downtown Core Use and Occupancy Payment, May 2004 700 CORRESPONDENCE 800 BY-LAWS Note: Items 801- 806 are from the Public Hearing of November 18, 2003 801 RZI051/03, 20718 Lougheed Highway 801.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6186-2003 To amend Schedule "A" of the Official Community Plan, Table 3, Section 1.5.2 "Table of OCP and Zoning Descriptions, by adding "CS-S (Adult Entertainment and Pawnshop Service Commercial)" immediately following "Service Commercial - CS-4 (Recreation Commercial)". Second and third reading 801.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6148-2003 To establish an Adult Entertainment and Pawnshop Service Commercial Zone. Second and third reading 801.3 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6146-2003 To rezone from CS-i (Service Commercial) to CS-S (Adult Entertainment and Pawnshop Service Commercial) to permit an Adult Entertainment, Pawnshop and Service Commercial use Second and third reading I Council Meeting Agenda April 27, 2004 Council Chamber Page 3 of 8 802 RZ/092/03, 10607 Industrial Avenue and 10703 & 10757/63 2481h Street 802.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6213-2004 To designate from Conservation, Single Family Residential (12 units per net hectare) and Single Family Residential (18 units per net hectare) to Conservation, Single Family Residential (12 units per net hectare) and Single Family Residential (18 units per net hectare) Second and third reading 802.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6214-2004 To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential to permit the future subdivision into approximately 170 residential lots. Second and third reading 803 RZ/077/02, 11673 240 Street 803.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6086-2002 To designate from Single Family Residential (15,18,30 units per net hectare) to Conservation and Park and to include into Development Permit Area XXXVIII(5) Second and third reading 803.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6085-2002 To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and CD- 1-93 (Amenity Residential District) to CD- 1-93 (Amenity Residential District) and P1 (Park and School) to permit the future subdivision into 26 residential lots. Second and third reading 804 RZ/129/03, 21222 123 Avenue Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6200-2004 To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential to permit the future subdivision into 2 • residential lots Second and third reading 805 RZ/032/03, 11176 Gilker Hill Road 805.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6204-2004 To include in Development Permit Area XXI (34) Second and third reading Council Meeting Agenda April 27, 2004 Council Chamber Page 4 of 8 805.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6205-2004 To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit the future construction of approximately 37 townhouse units Second and third reading 806 RZ/008/04, 11330 & 11342 236 Street Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6203-2004 To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to CD-1-93 (Amenity Residential District) to permit the future subdivision into 16 residential lots Second and third reading 807 RZ/037/03, 24318 102 Avenue Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and Loan Authorization Amending By-law No. 61 60-2003 To include the subject property into Sewer Area "A" Final reading 808 Maple Ridge Financial Amending Plan Bylaw No. 6225-2004 (to be circulated separately) To adopt a new Financial Plan for 2004-2008 Three readings 809 Maple Ridge Tax Rates Bylaw No. 6226-2004 (to be circulated separately) To set the tax rates for the year 2004 Three readings 810 Maple Ridge Sewer Rate Amending Bylaw No. 6216-2004 • To amend the annual sewer rates Three readings 811 Maple Ridge Water Service Amending Bylaw No. 6217-2004 To amend the annual water rates Three readings Council Meeting Agenda April 27, 2004 Council Chamber Page 5 of 8 COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 900 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE 901 Minutes - April 19, 2004 The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting. Public Works and Development Services 902 RZ/076103, 24181 113 Ave., 11378 240 Street and 11330 240 Street, RS-3 to R-1, RS-lb, RS-1, RS-3 and CD-1-93 Staff report dated April 8, 2004 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6206-2004 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6207-2004 to permit future subdivision into approximately 51 lots be read a first time and forwarded to Public Hearing. 903 RZ/120/03, 23608 to 23628 Dewdney Trunk, RS-3 to RM-1 and R-3 Staff report dated April 13, 2004 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6218-2004 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 62 19-2004 to permit development of nine new units and retention of two existing dwellings be read a first time and forwarded to Public Hearing. 904 D-P/031104, 232-15 Dew• •dn•ey Trunk Rd. Staff report dated March 29, 2004 recommending that the Municipal Clerk be authorized to sign DP/031/04 to permit construction of commercial space with a residential unit occupying the second floor. V - 905 SD/i 08/02, 23573 Kanaka Way, 5% Money in lieu of parkiand dedication Staff report dated April 1, 2004 recommending that the owner of the land pay the District an amount that is not less than $60,000. Council Meeting Agenda April 27, 2004 Council Chamber Page 6 of 8 906 Administrative Agreement with the Province regarding Electrical and Gas Inspection Staff report dated April 5, 2004 recommending that the Mayor and Municipal Clerk be authorized to sign the Agreement which permits the District to continue to provide electrical and gas inspection services. 907 Replacement of the 232 Street Bridge over the South Alouette River Staff report dated April 14, 2004 recommending that Contract E02-010-059.1 be awarded to Seismic 2000 Construction Ltd. for the total sum of $4,515,948 and that the 2004-2008 Financial Plan and future financial plans be revised as noted in the report. 908 Municipal Equipment Purchase, Street Sweeper Staff report dated April 5, 2004 recommending that tender #2004-20 for replacement of one Regenerative Air Street Sweeper be awarded to Crocker Equipment Co. Ltd. in the amount of $190,563.50. Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police) 931 Tag Day Soliciting, 583 Coronation Squadron, Royal Canadian Air Cadets Staff report dated April 2, 2004 recommending that the request of the Air Cadets for permission to conduct Tag Day soliciting on May 14 and 15, 2004 be approved. 932 Police Services Masterplan Staff report dated April 6, 2004 recommending that a Police .Masterplan be developed using a methodology similar to that used in developing the Fire Department Masterplan. Council Meeting Agenda April 27, 2004 Council Chamber Page 7 of 8 Community Development and Recreation Service 951 Municipal Position re Blue Mountain Forest Staff report dated April 6, 2004 recommending that a letter be forwarded to the Minister of Forests and the Minister of Sustainable Resource Management supporting the addition of an area west of the existing BCIT Woodlot to Kanaka Creek Regional Park, the addition of lands on the eastern slopes of Alouette Lake to Golden Ears Provincial Park and improvements to the management of timber harvest and recreation in the remainder of the Blue Mountain Provincial Forest. Note: At Committee of the Whole Council amended the recommendation in the staff report to delete the words "in Blue Mountain Provincial Forest" from bullet b.). Correspondence - Nil Other committee Issues- Nil 1000 STAFF REPORTS 1098 MAYOR'S REPORT 1099 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS 1100 OTHER MA TTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT Council Meeting Agenda April 27, 2004 Council Chamber Page 8 of 8 1200 NOTICES OF MOTION 1300 ADJOURNMENT 1400 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to seek clarification about an item on the agenda, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. If a member of the public has a concern related to a Municipal staff member, it should be brought to the attention of the Mayor andlor Chief Administrative Officer in a private meeting. The decision to televise the Question Period is subject to review. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes only to ask their question (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, it will be responded to at a later date at a subsequent Council Meeting. Other opportunities to address Council may be available through the office of the Municipal Clerk who can be contacted at (604) 463-5221. Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge and the Corporation of the District of Pitt Meadows MAPLE RIDGE and PITT MEADOWS PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission. held at the Ridge Meadows Seniors' Activity Centre. 12150 224th Street. Maple Ridge. British Columbia. on Thursday. March 11. 2004 at 6:00 pm. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Commissioner Kathy Morse Commissioner Don MacLean Commissioner Cheryl Ashlie Commissioner Judy Dueck Commissioner Debra Eisel Commissioner Dave Rempel Commissioner Kathie Ward Commissioner Gwen O'Connell District of Maple Ridge. Mayor District of Pitt Meadows, Mayor School District No. 42, Trustee Chair District of Maple Ridge, Councillor District of Pitt Meadows, Councillor School District No. 42, Trustee School District No. 42, Trustee District of Pitt Meadows, Alternate Councillor COMMISSION MEMBERS AT LARGE Mr. Dave Roemer Maple Ridge Mr. Gerr Trerise Maple Ridge Ms. Jo Anne ten Brink Maple Ridge Ms. Kathy Reinheimer Maple Ridge Mr. Keith Nightingale Pitt Meadows Ms. Bunny Home Pitt Meadows STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Mike Murray ingrid Kraus - Shelley Jorde Javnne Aster REGRETS Commissioner Craig Speirs GM. Communi Development. Parks & Recreation Executive Assistant Recreation Manager. East Area Committee Clerk District of Maple Ridge. Councillor There being a quorum present. the Chair called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm. Adoption of the Agenda MOVED BY SECONDED BY That the Agenda for March 11, 2004 be adopted as circulated. CARRIED Alcote Riaae and Pzz-r Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Comrriisszort Requar Mzrtuzes Page 2 of 3 Y03 Maple Ridge and Pin Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission Recular Meeting Minutes March 1.2004 Minutes of the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission Regular Meeting MOVED BY SECONDED BY That the Minutes of the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission February 12, 2004 Regular Meeting be adopted as circulated. CARRIED Delegations or Presentations 3.1 Committee Clerk Mayor Don MacLean introduced Ja nne Aster as the new Committee Clerk. Decision Items 4.1 Nil Information Items MOVED BY SECONDED BY That the information items be received. CARRIED 5.1 Community Group Survey Results - Shelley Jorde. Recreational Manager S. Jorde reported on the Community Group survey results stating that we had a 34% response rate which was greater than the last survey response rate. The higher response was in part due to the inclusion of self-addressed stamped envelopes included in the survey that encouraged people to respond. S. Jorde reported that the response to the survey is very helpful in creating dialog with community groups and informing them of services available. It was requested that the names of the groups who responded to the survey be circulated among committee members. 5.2 Letter from Mrs. L. Desjardins re RMSS Weilness Clinic Letter was received from Mrs. Desjardins appreciating significant help and information received through the RMSS Weilness Clinic. Pitt Meadows Mayor Don MacLean recommended the letter be copied to the Fraser Health Authority and also to the United Way who partially funds the Weliness Clinic 5.3 Letter to Ridge Meadows Senior Sociew re RMSS Wellness Clinic 5.4 News Release, Ministry. Water. Land and Air Protection re Burns Bog. Mapie Ridge and Pin Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission Regular Minutes Page 2 of 3 Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Pa&s & Leisure Services Commission Regular Meeting Minutes March 11.2004 5.5 Letter and Press Release from BC Seniors Games Society 5.6 Commission's Workshop - Summary of Participant Discussion 5.7 Judo/Aikido Space - verbal update M. Murray spoke about how staff had located what they thought was suitable space for the group but later discovered a discrepancy with rental costs. M. Murray also spoke about the buzz surrounding the letter sent to this group ending the occupation of their current space, and that this was not meant to have occurred in this way. A reversal of this letter was given to the group..and an in-person apology was made. Both of the groups involved are non-profit. similar to minor sports organizations. We wish to encourage and support them. Thanks were given to M. Murray for his handling of this issue. 6 Commission Liaison Reports Commissioner Home reported that the community of Delta gives $500 to any group runnin2 a sporting event there. Staff Liaison Reports M. Murrayreported on gathering information regarding festival groups facing almost double insurance premium increases, especially where a parade is involved. M. Murray is going to ask the Municipal insurance Agency (MIA) to investigate and see what can be done. M. Murray reported on the second artificial turf field. M. Murray then reported that the Art Gallery has signed the fee-for-service agreement. There had been inquires at the Leisure Centre regarding the definition and parameters of the Family Admission rates such as. can couples use these passes? Clearer wording was drafted to clarif' that couples can use the family admission. as well as clarifying grandparents with grandchildren can also use the family rate. M. Murray reported that the Leisure Centre revenue looks good. We have received two proposals for the Pitt Meadows Recreation Centre Aquatic Facility (we had called for three). Pitt Meadows set the budget and the terms of the proposal. The proposals will be analysed by placement on a grid to rate them, and then the contract will be awarded. It was suggested the consultant be brought to a future meeting with the Commission. Question Period - no questions were raised. 9 Adjournment M. lvi o.nie Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Seances Commission Regular Minutes Page 3 of 3 Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9 Telephone: (604) 463-5221 Fax: (604) 467-7329 IVIA.PLE RI1JE E-mail: enquiries@mapleridge.org www.mapieridge.org ncorporated 12 September, 1874 March 12, 2004 File No: 5810-01 Braden Kolbe Fairview Elementary School 12209— 200" Street Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 1T8 Via Fax No: 604-465-7856 Dear Braden Kolbe: In response to your letter requesting to appear before Municipal Council to request a skate park be built in west Maple Ridge, the following arrangements are confirmed: Council Meeting April 27, 2004 Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Yours truly. Ceri MarIo Confidential- Secretary- -. - /dd gpo, "Promoting a Safe and Livable Community for our Present and Future Citizens" 1 OO Recycled Pacer 03112/2004 11:04 6044657856 t - FAIRVIEW ELEMENTARYQ PAGE 03 20701 120 B Avenue Maple Ridge, BC V2X 9T3 March 11, 2004 Terry Fryer bistrict of Maple Ridge 11997 Haney place Maple Ridge BC, V2X 6A9 bear Mayor and Council, My name is Braden Kolbe and I want a skatepork in I want to present my reasons. Can I come and shot have talked to Ceri and would like to come on April presentation will take about 5 minutes. Iam giving When it is finished it will have more information in You can reach me at home at 604 460 1942 or at s 9331. You can fax me at Fairview school too 604 4 est Maple Ridge. them to council? I 7th at 7:00. My a draft copy. jol at 604 465 7856. Yours truly, 63/12/2004 11:04 6044657856 FAIRVIEW ELEMENTARVQ PAGE' 02 Why we should have another skate park iii Maple idge... Hi, our names are Brian, Braden and &raeMe. I think we should have an outdoor skate park in Mc41e Ridge. Other skate parks are so far away like inP1tt Meadows ,Honey Place and &re9 Moore indoor skatj park If we build an outdoor skate park it will be in between Planet Ig... and A _police- station Also it will be iupervised. Anybody that goes there will need protection,such as a helmet,knee padselbow pads and so on .... If we build a skate park Bikes,Skate boards,scooters bnd roller blades will all be allowed at the skate parik. As you see, our point is to build an outdoor skate park in Maple lidge that will keep kids busy on the weelkends and on 5ummer Vocation.The reason why I am sclying this is because kids like, to go to skate parks and have fun.Also some parents cannot drive and their kidsfeeI left out. What I am trying to saying is BUILD ANOTHER SKATE PARKIIV1 Thank,you for taking the time to listen to our speech and I hope you learnt something. Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge 119115 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9 Telephone: (604) 463-5221 Fax: (604) 467-7329 L'..PLE RIDGE E-mail: enquiriesmapIeridge.org ox,rated 12 Septnber,1874 www.rriapleridge.org March 22. 2004 File No: 0230-0 1 Carolyn Chalifoux, Secretary-Treasurer New Westminster & District Labour Council #203A - 800 McBride Boulevard New Westminster, B.C. V3L 2B8 Dear Carolyn Chalifoux: Re: Day of Mourning Presentation In response to your correspondence dated March 18, 2004, requesting to appear as a delegation for a Day of Mourning presentation, the following arrangements are confirmed: Council Meeting April 27,2004 Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. Due to time constraints, it is necessary to limit delegation appearances to a maximum of ten (10) minutes, and we would ask that prior to the meeting, you ensure that your presentation will be completed within this allotted time. If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, Ceri Mario Confidential Secretary /dd Tol "Promoting a Safe and Livable Community for our Present and Future Citizens" 100% Recycled Paper ....1 LAB COUNCIL ID:6045240996 MAR 19'04 9:22 No.003 P.02 Carolyn Challfoux New Westminster & Distria Labour Coundl Charlered by the Canadian Labour Congress %77 BY FAX 64-467-7329 March 18, 2004 Kathy Morse, Mayor City of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Dear Mayor Morse: Re: Day.of Mourning Presentation The Day of Mourning for Workers Killed & injured on the Job" is recognized nationally on April as a day to mourn for workers who have been killed and injured and an opportunity to rededicate ourselves to improve working cOnditions through education and prevention initiatives. The New Westminster & District Labour Council requests an opportunity to make a presentation for 7 to 10 minutes atan evening Council meeting the week of April 19 0, or April 26th• A resident of your communIty will present to Council on behalf of the Labour Council. Our presentation will be educational for the Council members and public by providing up- to-date Information on workers health and safety issues, emerging trends, current statistics and the impact of Bill C-45 An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (criminal liability of organizations) which received Royal Assent on November 71h, 2003. We appreciate your commitment to the important issue of workplace health and safety and look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible. Sincerely, VarolyAn&if4o/, Secretary- easurer. cc/sf:opeiu 15 ® #203A - 800 McBride Bouiovord, New Westminster, B.C. V3L 2138 Tel CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6186-2003. A By-law to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS the Local Government Act empowers a local government to adopt or amend an Official Community Plan: AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "A" to the Official Community Plan: NOW THEREFORE. the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge. in open meeting assembled. ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending By-law No. 6186-2003." Table 3. Section 1.5.2 "Table of OCP and Zoning Descriptions", is hereby amended by adding "CS-S Adult Entertainment and Pawnshop Service Commercial" immediately following "Service Commercial - CS-4 - Recreation Commercial". Maple Ridge Official Community Plan By-law No. 5434-1996 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FffiST TIME the day of . A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of . A.D. 200. READ A SECOND TIME the day of . A.D. 200 READ A THIRD TIME the dayof .A.D.200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED. the day of A.D. 200. MAYOR CLERK sot / LI CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6148-2003 A By-law to amend the text of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6148-2003.' Part 3 - Basic Provision, Section 302 Zones, subsection (1) is amended by inserting the following in the table following the CS-4 Rural Commercial: "CS-S Adult Entertainment and Pawnshop Service Commercial" Part 7 Commercial Zones is amended by inserting the following after Section 710 Rural Commercial: CS-4: "711 ADULT ENTERTAINMENT AND PAWNSHOP SERVICE COMMERCIAL: CS-S This zone provides for adult oriented businesses and pawn shops and other uses catering to the motoring public. The zone is limited to areas of the community that are designated Service Commercial in the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan. 1) PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES adult entertainment; pawnshops; convenience store; highway commercial use; business.services.excluding-consulung services; 0 light industry limited to 279 m2 gross floor area: indoor commercial recreation: outdoor commercial recreation; personal repair services; personal services: professional services limited to veterinarians, architects, engineering and surveying offices, and drop-in medical clinics: 1) recycling depot; m) retail limited to household furnishings, vehicle parts and accessories, adult paraphernalia, second hand goods, antiques, and sports equipment and accessories, with other retail uses limited to a minimum 2000 m 2 gross floor area; Pare 2 Bylaw No. 6148-2003 restaurants and drive through use; warehousing; and Liquor Primary Establishment. 2) PERMIT1ED ACCESSORY USES retail to light industry use provided the accessory use gross floor area does not exceed 25% of the total principal use gross floor area; apartment; unenclosed storage; and Licensee Retail Store use shall: be located within a Liquor Primary Establishment; and not exceed 40 % gross floor area 3) LOT AREA Subject to Subsection (8), no lot shall be created which is less than: 0.4 ha in area where it is served by neither a community water system or community sewer system; 2,000 m2 in area where it is served by a community water system only; or 929 m2 in area where it is served by both a community water system and community sewer system. 4) LOT DIMENSIONS No lot shall be created which is less than: 18 m in width and 36 m in depth for a parcel served by both a community water system and community sewer system; or 30 in in width and 36 in in depth for a parcel served by a community water system only; or 36 m in width and 60 m in depth for a parcel served by neither a community water system or a community sewer system. 5) LOT COVERAGE All buildings and structures shall not: exceed a lot coverage of 40 1/1b; and exceed 95% coverage of the surface area of a lot for an off street parking or accessory off street parking use. 6) SIZE OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES No building or structure shall exceed a height of 7.7 m. Pagt 3 Bylaw No. 6148-2003 7) SITING No building or structure shall be sited less than: 9.0 m from a front lot line; 6.0 m from a rear lot line; 7.5 m from an exterior side lot line; except that for a drive-through business use, in addition to the front, rear and exterior side lot line setbacks specified above, no building shall be sited within 6.0 ni of the interior side lot line. ri Part 7 Commercial Zones is amended by renumbering Section 711 Heritage Commercial: H-I to 712 Heritage Commercial: H-i. Part 2 Interpretation is amended by adding the following definitions in correct alphabetical order: Adult Entertainment Use - means any premises used for the offering for rent, use, viewing or sale of an object, other than a contraceptive device, designed or intended to be used in a sexual act as defined by the Motion Picture Act of British Columbia. An Adult Entertainment Use shall include but not be limited to Adult Video Stores, Body Rub Studios, and Escort Services. Adult Video Stores - means any premise which is licensed as an "adult film distributor" or an "adult film retailer" under the Motion Picture Act of British Columbia. A video store is not defined as an Adult Video Store if the portion of the store requiring licensing under the Motion Picture Act of British Columbia represents less than 25% of the floor area dedicated to video sales and rentals. Body Rub Studio - means a business where the manipulating, touching or stimulating by any means, of a person's body or part thereof, is performed, offered, or solicited. This does not include a business where a person duly licensed or registered under any statute of the Province of British Columbia governing such activities gives medical, therapeutic or cosmetic massage treatment. Escort Services - means any persons conducting the business of providing escorts or partners for social occasions. Pawnshops - means the use of premises for the business of taking goods or chattels in pawn regardless of whether the provisions of the Pawnbrokers Act apply to the business. me Part 2 interpretation is amended by deleting the definition for Personal Service and replacing it with the following: "Personal Service means provision of specific services to the person including, but not limited to, barbering, hairdressing, beauty salons, tailoring, shoemaking, drycleaning and pet grooming, and excluding adult entertainment and pawnshop use. Page 4 Bylaw No. 6148-2003 7. Part 2 Interpretation is amended by deleting the definition for Retail and replacing it with the following: "Retail means a use providing for the sale for final consumption, in contrast to a sale for further sale or processing, and includes accessory manufacturing or assembly of the articles for sale. and excluding adult entertainment and pawnshop use." READ a first time the day of A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of A.D. 200. APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation and Highways this day of 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of 200. • A.D. A.D. MAYOR CLERK CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6146-2003 A By-law to amend Map "A" and the text of Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6146-2003. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as Lot 6, Except Part on SRW Plan 43436, District Lot 250, Group 1, Plan 8735, New Westminster District and shown outlined on Map No. 1308 is hereby rezoned to CS-S (Adult Entertainment and Pawnshop Commercial). READ a first time the day of A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation and Highways this day of , A.D. 200. RECONSiDERED-kNDFiNALLY*DQPTED; the day of . A.D. 200. MAYOR CLERK Tal.3 2.539 no A P 66429 1 1 46 300 P 76445 Rem 45 P 75912 \ P 54395 CIO .5 84hc. 5ho.765 /WS 2523 119 AVE. 119 AVE. RW 78433 LP 65229 / P 54395 4 P 87086 LP 60327 47 P5 LMP 5719 1.178 LP 65855 0.590 ho. 0.947 56524 i19 AVE. RW LMP 6890 L.ip2i! 80 11 18 \'l1IlI/ Ren 16 LRW 83276 RW L (L)J 1703 804 ' 0.446 ho. 6 IIr ii i i I P 2 1i ) I T1 35 36 75415 8 I A Rem RP8143 5 in P ______ T898 I (P 8735) P 17371 7371 / RW P 75414 NWS 2745 RP 9591 24 J /N 7781 100 2 j ____ 180 1 PO ____ in 13 Fe968 ______ t4/ I'd •)j 1I\ RP I"'° 25 26 0.14 97( 98 j Rerni1 LJC RW63825—' W 78108 118 AVE. CAMW000 AVE. _____ *PP055 6 P 75 14 75415 \\RW 7 6 197 11792 01 F-. CN fm 211 212 213 214 21 RW 82443ff RP 15896 11782 _____ _____ EP 5635 - 7f798 - - - - u NWS 3167 4 5 P 5 596 199 - 71775 3797 b I 0.797 11778 I If 77jS 218 219 20 221 22 t 200 -. MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6146-2003 Map No. 1308 From: CS-1(Service Commercial) To: CS-5(Adult Entertainment and Pawnshop Service Commercial) 0ANIM 300 a MAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12 September, 1574 1:2500 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 62 13-2004. A By-law to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "B" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amendment By-law No. 62 13-2004." That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot E, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 20280 Lot 1, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 21863 Lot 2, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 21863 are designated as shown on Map No. 670, a copy of which is attached hereto, and forms part of this bylaw. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan By-law No. 5434-1996 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. I READ A FIRST TIME the day of PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of READ A SECOND TIME the day of READ A THIRD TIME the day of RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the MAYOR A.D. 2004. A.D. 2004. A.D. 2004. A.D. 2004. dayof ,A.D.2004. CLERK tdO2./ a 'h I I A P2400 P2400 13 14 80050 L P swig _ 111IIIL — 12 _ 12 /2' 129/ '_' P 75487 _ I P 75457 P 72103 P 72100 P 72100 • 1 I I 132 p -----.------ - 4 5562 5 0 2 A 11529 — I/S 6 SE I 541504F F 11 p '11200 P l IC Is M MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6213-2004 Map No. 670 From: Conservation, Single Family Residential(12 units per net hectare) and Single Family Residential(18 units per net hectare) To:I','///,j Single Family Residential I::::::::::::::::::::::::::::J Single Family Residential Conservation V////A (12 units per net hectare) i:::.::1 (18 units per net hectare) AMAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12 September. 1874 1:5000 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 62 14-2004 A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6214-2004." Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot E, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 20280 Lot 1, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 21863 Lot 2, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 21863 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1323 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, are hereby rezoned to RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density)Residential) Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of A.D. 2004. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of A.D. 2004. READ a second time the day of A.D. 2004. READ a third time the day of A.D. 2004. APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of A.D. 2004. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of ,A.D. 2004. MAYOR CLERK 'O2.2.. S : W P 21 I — I Pie's I -.--.---.-..-- P 50024 P 10151 — _\ P2450 p150i9 K 0 £ — is •' - I 108 AVEi. •'%lIt___1,il7 I P 21993 S P21083 P 2MW EP 15313 SK 6504F 5 132 —JL T\ P 12223 ii MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6214-2004 Map No. 1323 From: RS-3(One Family Rural residential) To: RS—lb(One Family Urban(medium density)Residential) MAPLE RIDGE K Incorporated 12 September. 1874 1:5000 r/ ill CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6086-2002. A By-law to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "A" & "H" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amendment By-law No.6086-2002." Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 31, Section 16, Township 12, New Westminster District, LMP367 18 And outlined in heavy black line, is hereby redesignated to Conservation, and that portion shown hatched is hereby redesignated to Park, as shown on Map No.636, a copy of which is attached hereto, and forms part of this bylaw. Schedule "A" is hereby amended by adding the following in correct numerical order to Subsection (B) of Development Permit Area XXXVIII: Lot 31, Section 16, Township 12, New Westminster District, LMP36718 4. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 31, Section 16, Township 12, New Westminster District, LMP36718 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 668, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, is hereby designated as Development Permit Area XXX Vifi (5) on Schedule "H". [1 6. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Designation By-law No. 5434-1996 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 2004. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 2004. READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 2004. READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 2004. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 2004. MAYOR CLERK 10 I I i213J 1 50 ji9J 18.0 r~14 20.0 180 11 & l 28456I 118 AVE. PARK 'r uo t I'. l c Rem. 26 2 P 17€ 9 _.3 Jiki L 12 J-Mf 13 - i 14 _11 15 16 25 1 P 88 2 r — 41377 - PARK 1_ 4'. 2 iii 10 p. 9! 8 I 7 PARK b2 / Io LMP ' (' 1 0 P ARK 36724 117 B AVE. o 4M 30 BCP 4650 -. 1. ________ 4 o c13 __________ I .' art, - ..' 4 l 14! l 15! l 16! n 9 6 13 2 '41 ig% LIV P 4379 7 3 - 40 20 P 18230 ,1 5 2 PARK PARK 6 3 6 31 24 143796 0615 0.953 ho .., / Port 1.52 ha 35 25 Total: 7-85 he 8 LMP 3671 34 26 A ff5 U EP 35041 9 1,655 ff681 ff659 _______ 33 27 I 36718 0.809 ho 10 ii653 32 I 28 PARK -v 11650 ff661 31 29 200 31 111548 11651 - Part: 1.33 ho 12 1/637 30 11641 11638 — — — (J 13 29 1 25 I' — 14 11632 I 11631 116j4 11629 28 24 ) ) I I - 15 11628 1F627 16.0 ff630 jLMP 49349 ___ ,, I '' 1162 16 27 11622 23 ff621 ff624 0. \i I 3 / . /PARK 11617 26 22-1 ' ( PARK - BCP 1921 3721 1f616 11615 11678 \ 0.606 ho I Total area — 1.40 ho 20 21 22 23 24 ff610 21 \\ 11612 \\ 20 25 6 160Y BCP1921\ PARK I 49Ii\ e 116 AVE. Ci BCP 1921 ~PARK 116 AVE. o MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6086-2002 Map No. 636 From: Single Family Residential(15,18,30 units per net hectare) To: Conservation, and Park(shown hatched) MAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12 September, 1874 1:2500 I MAPLE. RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING I Bylaw No. 6086-2002 Map No. 668 PURPOSE: TO DESIGNATE AS DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA XXXVIII(5) AMAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12 September, 1874 1:2500 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO.6085-2002 A By-law to amend the text and Map "A" forming part of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No.6085-2002." That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: That portion of Lot 31, Section 16, Township 12, New Westminster District, LMP36718 and shown outlined in heavy black line is hereby rezoned to CD- 1-93 (Amenity Residential District) and that portion shown hatched is herby rezoned to P-i (Park and School) as shown on Map No. 1287 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510- 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a second time the day of READ a third time the day of RECOi\SIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the 2004. MAYOR A.D. 2004. A.D. 2004. A.D. 2004. A.D. 2004. day of CLERK $03,2., 11010 I 20.0 1804 II 11 I12113 I I l ,,ae i Is.oi 14 118 AVE. PARK,,) (6 N I I Rem. 26 50 7 1 2 3 4 2 3 4I5I P17C9 , 3 "o JI 6817 4377 25 /K\' ;/ /LP 4882 M 10 7 7 PARK / / Ni/ 4" 1 2 12 I LMP C PARK 36724 0 E I I I C l 13 141 151 161 V N 7 41 19 UP L I!L / Z N Y' P1 / 4 %/ - 23 PARK PARK I 6 ,.,-, 36 24 31 LMP 43796 0.615 p 0.953 ho Q 7 90 / Port: 1.52 ha 11L 35 25°' Total: 2.85 ho LMP/," A 34 26 EP 35041 11655 11681 27 0.809 ho 11656 1!671 36718 10 1; jis5j I 32 28 PARK -I 30 - 11 71550 - 11661 I 31 29 11548 11657 I 12 30 11641 11658 30_ % 13/755 29 LA 25 — 14 11552 28?. 11651 11654 \ I I 11529 15 11628 I .2 N. 17627 180\11630 241 ) ) 1162 27 o3 iLMP 49349, 23I 16 11522 11621 W 111624 0 11617 5 721 — 26 1/616 I Q-4 ff675 UI 22 PARK \'' \ \ 0.606 ho 20 21 22 23 24 11610 25 IIicog 21 11512 \ 6 11605 \11604 I \ \BcP1921\ C C 06 I16AVE. ci L_- I I; MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6085-2002 Map No. 1287 From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential and CD—i —93(Amenity Residential District) To: CD—i —93(Amenity Residential District) and P1 (Park and School) (shown hatched) 31 Part: 1.33 ho 3 BCP 1921 Totol area - 1.40 ho PARK 116 AVE. - 0 MAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12 September, 1574 1:2500 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6200 - 2004 A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6200 - 2004." That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot "G", Except, Part on Plan L2vfP3 5019, District Lot 242, Group 1, Plan 15242, New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1318 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, is/are hereby rezoned to RS-Ib (One Family Urban (Medium Density)Residential). Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a second time the day of READ &third. time the day of RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the 200. A.D. 200. A.D. 200. ,A.D.200. A.D. 200. day of A.D. MAYOR CLERK 0 - 733oj!329 \\ 290 63 8 299 L 12388 12385 e' 303 12397 ___ 12377 289 269 12.780 0 308 EIL B 19 _______ 288 302 123751 0 270 F2 309 P 62286 1237/ 2871 286 285 284 28' 12367 //' 2 _________ 12369 323 271 - - 310 P 7478 PARK 12365 ..1! k-jLy'282 12355 /2366 0.405 ho 18 12,22.9 31 1 272 McCALLU U . 121228 12358 1.619 ho. 1234.7 312 112 J 113 t2i ,273 P 37928 17 VN 1 PO 12331 12341 276 278 279 280 313 2 1'*277 12350 ____ _ ____ p.,274 c'P1584 16 12325 3211 32 3iaj31731j31 314 . 12336 6 7 5 .X7J/25 275 _31 j -- _:: - _0 - - 12324 _________________ i RW 60736 "EP 46260 123 AVE. LMP 35194 P 65631 LMP 35158,LMP 35282L P 35011 ,LMP 35291 3 l I Rem 3 E ' I '.' Rem Rem 4I Rem 5 I I I 14 1 13 j 12 I 11 1 I 2 I 3c1Ia. I 1 I 2 I p 3123 & I 152 P 530 2 i BC 75d5 I I p 6352 - 122 112294 I [ P 1784 = I EP 85 4 5 6a- BCP 75 9 I2 c, P 7 894 1t2134 I '' 804 24 2 oj , I 11731' 1226 1 2 I l ) i-I 3 21 1226, I 122 B AVE. \ 21296 STONEHOUSE I 12259 aJ 343 fflM2: v11"10 381 -J '' /225/ - (• 355 346 12255 12250 ° 9 /225 11733 \ BCP 17505 I 72247j I 372 1373 I 374 354 347J342 I I 380 —_> 7,24 / ?i224S 12240 0. /2219 112242 6 __________ I I 0/ 9 j 72227 12250 348 Ia341 4 7 k.,8 L 9 118 10 -.RW 67225 12239 F.60$61. I I 1 ____ 1 22i6. I 340 112234 j k k / 352 /2275 12225 12222 122 AVE. 0 / 377 \67224 -J / _____ 1" 12209 I ______ i I 142 l 48094 Cn 0- 1441145 148 149 J 351 350 Rem 722/2 Lj2217 12216 I _________ 4 i 22 21 1020 "19 uj f226 11461147 P 4b094 0 p. 0 143 l l I i50 152 I 153 3 P 1 823 1l 72200 a- 122 AVE. Rem 2 I P 1 5686 l l P 5583 ) 6355 l 72 "8661 9 22I 221 1222 1223 I I -1 -F; [160 I l j j 11591158 1157 1155 I1551 154 ____ CAMPBELL AVE. MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6200-2004 Map No. 1318 From: RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) To: RS—lb(One Family Urban(medium density)Residential) MAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12 September, 1874 1:2500 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6204 - 2004. A By-law to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "A" & "H" to the Official Community Plan: NOW THEREFOREL the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: I. This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amendment By-law No. 6204 - 2004." Schedule "A" is hereby amended by adding the following in correct numerical order to Subsection (B) of Development Permit Area XXI in the Appendix: Lot 10, D.L. 404, Gp. 1, Plan 11216,NWD (RZ/032/03) That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 10, District Lot 404, Group 1, Plan 11216, New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 666, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, is hereby designated as Development Permit Area XXI (34) on Schedule "H". Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Designation By-law No. 5434-1996 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 200. READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 200. REAl) A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. MAYOR CLERK Yi0,5 & / MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING I Bylaw No. 6204-2004 Map No. 666 PURPOSE: TO DESIGNATE AS DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA XXI(34) MAPLE RIDGE V Incorporated 12 September, 1674 1 1:2500 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6205 - 2004 A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6205 - 2004." That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 10, District Lot 404, Group 1, Plan 11216, New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1321 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, is/are hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. MAYOP CLERK ~Q:5012- 22 P 39988 2.827 he 19 P 416. 1.214 ho1 I Rem 19 P 35398 1.236 he LMP 26965 PcI. A' 1.24 ho 0.80 he 10 p., P 11216 1.267 he 0 11264 t~ c1 1 11224 IMP 26964 I Port S.E. 1/4 U I Sec.16 Tp. 12 Rem 4 P 24650 1.533 he IMP 3381 0.521 he he 11 120 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6205-2004 Map No. 1321 From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) To: RM-1(Townhouse Residential) REM. PcI. A jEP389 JJ LMP 22646 MP 135 1 23 4 5 P 93 0 22 20 LL I MAPLE RIDGE K tncorporated 12 September. 1874 - 1:2500 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6203 - 2004 A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6203 - 2004." Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 17, Section 16, Township 12, Plan 36461, New Westminster District and Lot 18, Section 16, Township 12, Plan 36461, New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on .Map No. 1320 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, are hereby rezoned to CD-l-93 (Amenity Residential District) Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a second time the day of READ a third time the day of RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the 200. A.D. 200. A.D. 200. A.D. 200. ,A.D.200. day of A.D. MAYOR CLERK 71410 0 7141 11412 _________ 115.1 15 Ln 24 33 1 42 74 713.98 ". '. 17396 J a. 1/39 IF 16 —25 34 I 11386j 43 Cl) Li 77384 _______ 7 13&i _______ < i 1138 C 17 26 35) 44 Li 17374 y7j7 (N 1137 _______ Li 18 27 ______ 36 45 (-) CN 17354 1.136.14 11356 I 1135 308 17.6 19 28 1 46 20.0 17354 I ' 1 5.5 , , 11 35 I 'A' 77355 1 II ha 18 1 11342 co 0.809 ha 1 1 LJ I. 17 0 11! LL ____ 0.809 ho 11296 IMP 31 163 " 1728 i389l 14 1 712.9 t-3 4 -. c Rem 13 P) •4. &C)" ) I 15 11290 w - D h 112 B AVE. 112 B AVE. 1 2 ' c ic I 172611 I oIo Ic \ 11251 I LMP1 3I163 . A181-3i I I 6I7I8 410)7 11 71231 MAPLE RiDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6203-2004 Map No. 1320 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: CD—i —93 (Amenity Residential District) 20.0 LMP T 43730 Cl) PARK Lu C,) Li Lu 0 PARK LMP 36163 //Ak\ APLE RIDGE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6160 - 2003 A By-law to extend Sewer Area "A" within the District of Maple Ridge WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, pursuant to Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and Loan Authorization By-law No. 2486 - 1977, established Sewer Area "A" within the boundaries of the Municipality; AND WHEREAS, the Council has received a petition from a property owner for the extension of Sewer Area "A" and deems it expedient to extend Sewer Area "A". NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and Loan Authorization Amending By-law No. 6160 -2003". That Maple Ridge Sewer Area "A" Sewerage Works Construction and Loan Authorization By-law No. 2486 - 1977 as amended be further amended by adding to Section 1, the following words: "and also shall include all those portions of: Lot 1, Except Plans 21429, 45949, LMP34684; Section 3, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 17126 as shown boldly marked on the map attached to the By-law and marked as Schedule "A". That the parcel noted in Paragraph 2 above, of this by-law shall bear the same charges as those properties in the original Sewer Area "A". READ a first time the day of , 2004 READ a second time the day of .2004 READ a third time the day of ,2004 RECONSIDERED and adopted the day of 2004. MAYOR CLERK Attachment: Schedule "A" 1 0 407 Puthoriz tjn Amending v- aw No A; 1 n - 71) IL. i...i ItUijjt1i-tuI1 .J 9. IUhJI I .) IJ 1[1 102 AVE 41 ; 24 25 12345 E1/2of2 1 11121314 L...............101 A A PARK 111111 rw~ 10 09 11 I'm' Z I I I I PROPOSED AREA TO BE INCLUDED INTO SEWER AREA A I EXISTING SEWER AREA A PROPOSED ADDITION TO SEWER AREA A C OR-P-RATION OF—TH-E--- DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FILE AREA A 0045.dwg IDATE JULY 2003 SCALE' - N.T.S. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 21, 2004 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council SUBJECT: 2004 Tax Rates Bylaw No. 6226 - 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: As per Section 359(1) of the Community Charter, Council must before May 15, adopt a tax rates bylaw that imposes property taxes for the year 204. Council has provided, for an increase of 4% in 2004 in the 2004 - 2008 Financial Plan. F Council has deliberated the Financial Plan taking into account changes that have occurred at the provincial level and the financial pressures that citizens are experiencing in the current economic period. They have provided opportunities for public consultation and balanced the needs and demands of a growing community. RECOMMENDATION: That the Maple Ridge 2004 Tax Rates Bylaw No. 6226 - 2004 be read a first, second time and third time. DISCUSSION: Background Context: Council adopted the 2004 - 2008 Financial Plan in December 2003. By-law No. 6225 - 2004 amends the Financial Plan to account for changes that reflect current financial conditions. The Financial Plan is consistent with Council's strategic direction and incorporates a 4% tax increase. Desired Outcome: Adoption of this by-law prior to May 15, 2004. The Five Year Financial Plan is based on a 4% tax increase in 2004 & 2005, 3.75% in 2006, 3.50% in 2007 and 3.0% in 2008. Strategic Alignment: Council has deliberated the Five Year Financial Plan in a public forum and reviewed all the tax increases to support the delivery of public municipal services. Citizen/Customer Implications & Communications: The implication to homeowners, businesses and industry is that they will experience a municipal tax increase and increase for utility charges. The increase will vary depending on the class and assessed value but will approximate 4%. For the average homeowner the financial impact of the Municipal Government controlled levy is approximately $61. In addition, there are property tax levies from other authorities such school, regional district etc.; the increase for these is approximately. .$23 per household; the . actual amount will vary depending on the individual property assessment increase. In total, the overall increase for municipal and other authoritiesis. approximately 4%. Tax Notices will be issued to property owners in late May and included with the Tax Notice is P. newsletter informing the taxpayers of the due date and methods of payment. 10 e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The Municipality derives over 50% of its' revenue requirement to fund operating expenditures from general taxation. The Five Year Financial Plan incorporates the tax increase and is required to balance the budget. t) Policy Implications: The tax increase of 4% is within the Business deliberated and approved by Council. Plan Guidelines 7" Edition May 2003; this was Real growth of the Residential Property Class continues to significantly outpace all the other classes. Municipal policy provides for a transfer of up to 'A% of taxation from the Major and Light Industry Class to the Residential Class. This signifies Council's commitment to support industry in the endeavour of investment and job creation. g) Alternatives: Council has considered alternative sources of revenue during the Business Planning Review; these included changes or increases to user rates, increases to various licenses, permits and fines and the use of various reserves and accumulated surplus. When deemed appropriate and within current policy this will occur, however, a dependency on the use of reserves for operation management is not sustainable and either leads to a significant tax increase or curtailment of the service. In addition, over a period of time it will bring the Light Industry and Business Class to the same tax rate. For the homeowner this tax shift is less than 40 cents. CONCLUSIONS: The Tax Rates Bylaw incorporates a tax increase of 4 % compared to the 2003 Budget. The tax rates reflect a tax shift of ½% from the Major and Light Industry Classes to the Residential Class. Although the amount is small in actual dollar terms, this shift on a cumulative basis over the past many years demonstrates a taxation policy that encourages expansion and retention of industry in Maple Ridge. Prepared by: Trevor Thompson, BBA Budget Officer Concurrence by: Jacob Sorba, CGA Di•rector•of Finance......... Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, CGA GM - Corporate and Financial Services Concurrence: / J. L. im) Rule JGS/jgs / / Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6226 - 2004 A By-law for the levying of rates for Municipal, Improvement District and Regional District purposes for the year 2004. The Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Tax Rates By-law No. 6226 - 2004". 2. The following rates are hereby imposed and levied for the year 2004: For all lawful general purposes of the muuicipality on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for general municipal purposes, rates appearing in Row "A" of Schedule "A" attached hereto and forming a part hereof. For debt purposes on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for general municipal purposes, rates appearing in Row "B" of Schedule "A" attached hereto and forming a part hereof. For library purposes on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for general municipal purposes, rates appearing in Row "C" of Schedule "A" attached hereto and forming a part hereof. For purposes of the British Columbia Assessment Authority on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for regional hospital district purposes, rates appearing in Row "A" of Schedule "B" attached hereto and -forming a part hereof. For purposes of the Municipal Finance Authority on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for regional hospital district purposes, rates appearing in Row "B" of Schedule "B" attached hereto and forming a part hereof. (I) For purposes of the Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for regional hospital district purposes, •.-Tates appearing in Row "C" of Schedule "B"-attached hereto and forniinga part hereof. (g) For purposes of the Greater Vancouver Regional District on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for regional hospital district purposes, rates appearing in Row "D" of Schedule "B" attached hereto and forming a part hereof. By-law No. 6226 - 2004 Page (2) 3. The minimum amount of taxation upon a parcel of real property shall be One Dollar ($1.00). READ a first time the day of 2004 READ a second time the day of 2004 READ a third time the day of 2004 RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED the day of 2004. YOR CLERK U ATTACHMENTS: SCHEDULES "A" AND "B" Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Schedule 'A' to Bylaw No. 6226-2004 Tax Rates (dollars of tax per $1,000 taxable value) 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 Major Light Business! Red Residential Utility Industry Industry Other Non-profit Farm A General 4.2492 37.6888 51.5599 13.2910 13.1488 10.6428 15.1435 Municipal B Debt 0.0489 0.4449 0.5961 0.1537 0.1512 0.1225 0.1741 C Library 0.2407 1.8663 3.5941 1.0403 0.7547 0.6156 0.8701 Total 4.5388 40.0000 55.7501 14.4850 14.0547 11.3809 16.1877 Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Schedule 'B' to By-law No. 6226-2004 Tax Rates (dollars of tax per $1,000 taxable value) 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 Major Light Business! Red Residential Utility Industry Industry Other Non-profit Farm A B.C. 0.1057 0.5424 0.5424 0.2959 0.2959 0.1057 0.1057 Assessment Authority B Municipal 0.0003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0001 0.0002 0.0002 Finance Authority C Greater 0.2752 2.3377 2.2725 2.2725 1.6360 0.2752 0.2752 Vancouver Transportation Authority D Greater 0.1041 0.3644 0.3539 0.3539 0.2550 0.1041 0.1041 Vancouver Regional District Total 0.4853 3.2450 3.1693 2.9228 2.1870 0.4852 0.4852 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 20, 2004 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council SUBJECT: Sewer Rate Schedule Amendments Bylaw No. 6216 - 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 2004 - 2008 Business Plan and Consolidated Financial Plan adopted in December 2003 provide for a 4% increase in the sewer rates. This is necessary to support the increase in operating costs and to offset the significant increase in the cost of liquid waste treatment and disposal by the Greater Vancouver Sewer and Drainage District (GVS & DD). This rate increase is projected to generate an additional $290,000 in revenue. The Sewer Utility Fund is projected to incur a deficit in 2004 of $2.OM of which $1.4M is the result of an expanded capital expenditure program. The Sewer Utility Revenue Fund balance at the end of 2003 was $7.7M and is projected to decline to $5.7M at the end of 2004. RECOMMENDATION: That the Maple Ridge Sewer Utility Rates Amending By-law No. 6216 - 2004 be read a first and second time and that the Rules of Order be waived and the Maple Ridge Sewer Utility Rates Amending By-law No. 6216 - 2004 be read a third time. DISCUSSION: Background Context: The 2004 - 2008 Business Plan and Consolidated Financial Plan provide for a 4% increase in the sewer rate structure. The GVS & DD manage the treatment and disposal of liquid waste under agreement. This cost is projected to increase from 30% - 50% in the next five years. This charge has increased by 11.3% or $404,000 in 2004. In addition, the Municipality is faced with rising internal costs and wishes to proceed with a $1.4M 2004 capital program that is financed from the Sewer Utility Fund. The Business Plan model is built to have the annual rate increase keep pace with the increase in operating costs and with capital expenditures financed from the utility accumulated surplus. The premise in prior years was for a smoothening of the increase in GVS & DD charges through a structure of long term rate stabilization. Charges from the GVS & DD have been skewed and volatile over the past number of years making the administration of rate stabilization more difficult. Desired Outcome: That the rate structure be amended as per the 2004 - 2008 Consolidated Financial Plan; the increased revenue will offset increased treatment and disposal cost from the GVS & DD and provide for the increased operational costs of the utility and capital costs. Strategic Alignment: Disposal and treatment of liquid waste is a basic requirement to the well being of our community. By being a member of the GVS & DD we are able to provide this service in a very cost-effective manner to our citizens. Citizen/Customer Implications & Communications: Sewer rates were increased by 4% in 2003 and although operating results were favourable for 2003, the Sewer Utility Revenue Fund balance declined by $757,000 from 2002. The projected deficit in 2004 makes it necessary to pass the increased cost of operating the utility onto the user or incur the risk of very large increases in the future. The capital expenditures will continue to provide for a high quality and reliable service. Sewer rates in Maple Ridge are comparable to other local governments in the lower mainland. A homeowner will experience an increase of $6.70 to $174.20; a business on a metered system will experience an equivalent increase to the 4%. Metered customers will notice the increase on their utility bill for the first quarter while homeowners will have the annual charge appear on their Tax Notice in May. Business Plan/Financial Implications: The Business Plan recommended that rates be increased to offset the cost increase to a limit of 4% for 2004; a transfer from the utility accumulated surplus would provide for any budgetary shortfall. The implication of not passing the rate increase will mean that as future increases from the GVS & DD occur, more substantial annual increases or reductions to the capital program will be required as most of the costs in the utility are fixed. The proposed rate structure is slightly short of our guideline, however, within an acceptable limit and will accommodate $2.5M of funding required for the capital program. For the 2005 - 2009 financial period, business plan and budget deliberations will focus on the required and acceptable level of reserves and surplus, projected capital expenditures, growth, equitable distribution of the cost burden and rates that will sustain the utility at an acceptable standard. We also contemplate that the capital program put forth by the GVS & DD will have a more defined long-range budget. fl Policy Implications: None; the policy guideline for the utility is a user-pay philosophy. Council has requested that any type of rate stabilization fund that will use a smoothening approach to future sewer rate increases be at the discretion of Maple Ridge and not the GVS & DD; i.e. a made in Maple Ridge approach. g)..Alter-natives:- - -- - . The rates can be less than 4% by appropriating a greater amount of funds from the utility accumulated surplus. This is not recommended as it usually leads to larger increases in future years. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended increase is consistent with the business plan and although increased by 4% we will require an appropriation from surplus to help fund the capital program and to a lesser extent operations. There is a requirement that in the 2005 - 2009 fiscal period that a long-term rate strategy be developed and implemented to ensure sustainability and financial prudence in managing the utility. Prepared by: Jacob G. Director of Finance Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, CGA GM - Corporate and Financial Services J. L. QJim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer JGS/jgs CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6216-2004 A By-law to further amend Maple Ridge Sewer Rate By-law No. 718 - 1964 WHEREAS, the Council may by by-law impose a charge against the owner or occupier of real property for the use of a sewage system and may vary the charge; - AND WHEREAS, the Council wishes to amend the sewer charge for all uses; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This By-law shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Sewer Rate Amending By-law No. 6216-2004". The part entitled "Residential" and "Commercial"in Section 3 of Maple Ridge Sewer Rate By- law No. 718-1964 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: RESIDENTIAL Single Family Residential Duplex Triplex Apartment Townhouse Mobile Home Boarding House, Including Rest Homes COMMERCiAL• Each Hall Each Theatre Each Church Each Store Each Office Each Shop Each Barber Shop $174.20 $174.20 $174.20 $174.20 $174.20 $174.20 $174.20 $45.34 $174.20 $174.20 $174.20 $174.20 $174.20 $174.20 $174.20 per dwelling unit per dwelling unit per dwelling unit per dwelling unit per dwelling unit per dwelling unit per dwelling unit for each boarder or roomer kept in excess of two (2) boarders or roomers By-law No. 6216-2004 Page 2 COMMERCIAL (cont'd) Each Beauty Shop $174.20 Each Restaurant $174.20 up to 10 seats $17.89 for each additional seat Each School $126.15 per classroom Each Hospital $126.15 per bed Each Motel or Hotel $174.20 first room $45.76 for each additional room Each Beverage Room $174.20 up to 10 seats $17.89 for each additional seat Each Laundry $286.73 Each Dry Cleaner $174.20 Each Laundromat $174.20 minimum $45.76 per machine 3. The part entitled "Industrial" in Section 3 of Maple Ridge Sewer Rate By-law No. 718-1964 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: INDUSTRIAL All Industrial Uses The charge shall be 72.71% of the metered rate as established for the subject parcel by Maple Ridge Water Service By-law No. 6002-200 1 (as amended) except, however, if the said parcel is not metered, then the rate for each industrial user connected to the sanitary sewer shall be the same as the flat rate of $174.20 READ a first time the day of , 2004 READ a second time the day of , 2004. READ a third time the day of , 2004. RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of , 2004. YOR CLERK CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 20, 2004 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council SUBJECT: Water Rate Schedule Amendments Bylaw No.62 17 - 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 2004 - 2008 Business Plan and Consolidated Financial Plan adopted in December 2003 provide for a 4% increase in the water rates. This is necessary to support the increase in operating costs and to offset the increase in the cost of purchased water from the Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD). This rate increase is projected to generate an additional $340,000 in revenue. The Water Utility Fund is projected to incur a deficit of $439,000 in 2004; an appropriation from the utility accumulated surplus provides for the budgetary shortfall in order to hold the increase to the Council directive of 4%. RECOMMENDATION: That Maple Ridge Water Service Amending By-law No. 6217 - 2004 be read a first and second time and that the Rules of Order be waived and the Maple Ridge Water Service Amending By-law No. 6217— 2004 be read a third time. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The 2004 - 2008 Business Plan and Consolidated Financial Plan provide for a 4% increase in the water rate structure. When the Plans were adopted in 2003 the increased cost for purchased water from the Greater Vancouver Water District was not known. They are projected to increase by 70% - 100% over this period. Capital expenditures for the GVWD are projected at $1B by 2013. Maple Ridge is attempting to smooth out the increased rate structure over this period to stabilize rate increases to the user. The GVWD is undertaking major infrastructure construction and rehabilitation work as a safe and dependable supply of water is at the forefront of a growing region. In addition, the Municipality is faced with rising internal operating costs and wishes to proceed with a $1.9M 2004 capital program that is financed from the Water Utility Revenue Fund. The Water Utility Revenue Fund had favourable results as compared to budget in 2003. This was largely in part because water purchase costs were down due to watering restrictions while revenue from sales remained at budget. In 2004 water purchases are projected to increase by $430,000 but debt service costs will decline by $255,000. A combination of these factors has enabled the deficit to remain at a modest level. Council, through the Business Planning process, directed staff to limit the increase in rates to 4% in 2004. They also requested a rate structure for 2005 - 2009 that will take into account the projected increases from the GVWD through a rate stabilization structure and take into account the changes approved in 2002 for a more equitable rate structure (metered vs. flat rate). With such significant increases forthcoming it was desirable that the revenues are sustainable and transparent. TF 11 Desired Outcome: That the rate structure be amended as per the 2004 - 2008 Consolidated Financial Plan; the increased revenue will offset increased water purchase costs from the GVWD and provide for the increased operational costs of the utility and capital costs. Strategic Alignment: Delivery of adequate and safe drinking water to our citizens and businesses is an integral part of the well being of our community and is basic to the needs of economic and social stability. The cost of providing that service is borne by the users. Citizen/Customer Implications & Communications: Water users have experienced increases to water rates for the past many years; this will continue well into the future with the cost of water purchased from the GVWD expected to rise significantly. The projected deficit in 2004 makes it necessary to pass the increased cost of operating the utility onto the user or incur the risk of very large increases in the future. The capital expenditures will continue to provide for a high quality and reliable service. Water rates in Maple Ridge are comparable to other local governments in the lower mainland. In 2004 a homeowner will experience an increase of $9.20 to $239.20; a business on a metered system will experience an equivalent increase to the 4%. Metered customers will notice the increase on their utility bill for the first quarter while homeowners will have the annual charge appear on their Tax Notice in May. Business Plan/Financial Implications: The Business Plan recommended that rates be increased to offset these costs to a limit of 4%; a transfer from the utility fund balance would provide for any budgetary shortfall. The implication of not passing the rate increase will mean that as future increases from the GVWD occur, more substantial annual rate increases will be required or a reduction in the service level. In a utility, cutting costs is difficult because most of the operating costs are fixed and capital expenditures are critical to a utility remaining viable. For the 2005 - 2009 financial period, business plan and budget deliberations will focus on the required and acceptable level of reserves and surplus, projected capital expenditures, growth, equitable distribution of the cost burden and rates that will sustain the utility at an acceptable standard. Policy Implications: None -the-polic-y- guideline is a--user-pa-y-philosoph•y -Council h-as--r-eq-uested-t-hat-•an.-y-•t-y.pe--of•r-ate - - - stabilization fund that will use a smoothening approach to future water rate increases be at the discretion of Maple Ridge and not the GVWD; i.e. a made in Maple Ridge approach. Council will look at these alternatives for the 2005 - 2009 business plan deliberations. Alternatives: The rates can be less than 4% by appropriating a greater amount of funds from the utility accumulated surplus. This is not recommended as that will lead to a much larger increase in future years as the costs from the GVWD capital program roll out. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended increase is consistent with the business plan and although increased by 4% we will require an appropriation from surplus to help fund the capital program. There is a requirement that in the 2005 - 2009 fiscal period that a long-term rate strategy be developed and implemented to ensure sustainability and financial prudence in managing the utility. This matter was deferred from 2004 because of the unknowns from the GVWD. - AqA___~ Prepared by: Jacob G. Sorba, CGA Director of Finance Approved by: Paul Gill, B A, CGA GM - Corporate and Financial Services CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6217-2004 A By-law to amend Maple Ridge Water Service By-law No. 6002-200 1 WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Water Service By-law No. 6002-200 1 to adjust the fees to more truly reflect the actual average costs; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This By-law shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Water Service Amending By-law No. 6217-2004". That Schedules "A" and "B" be deleted in their entirety and Schedules "A" and "B" attached hereto be substituted thereto. READ a first time the day of , 2004 READ a second time the day of , 2004. READ a third time the day of ,2004. RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of ,2004 MAYOR CLERK. Attachment: Schedules A, & B Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Maple Ridge Water Service Amending By-law No. 6217-2004 SCHEDULE "A" Flat Rate Charges (Annual Rates) USES RATE A. Residential Per Single Family Dwelling Unit in the General $239.20 Water Supply Area Per Additional Dwelling Unit located within the $119.60 Structure of a single family dwelling unit Per Multiple Dwelling Unit $227.14 Per Dwelling Unit in the Garibaldi Water Supply Area and the Rothsay Water Supply Area the residential rate set from time to time in Section A(1) of this schedule plus $357.00 per dwelling unit; Provided that commencing in the year 2015, the rate in the Rothsay Water Supply Area and in the year 2016, the rate in the Garibaldi Area shall be only the residential rate set from time to time per dwelling in Section A(1) of this Schedule. B. Industrial, Commercial, Institutional (1) Per Unit $239.20 Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Maple Ridge Water Service Amending By-law No. 6217-2004 SCHEDULE "B" Meter Rates Water consumption charges for metered services per quarter shall be at $0.4 10 per m 3. A base rate will be levied per quarter in addition to consumption charge noted in paragraph (1) as follows: Connection Size Base Rate per Quarter 25mmorless $18.41 40mm i $27.04 50mm $43.26 75mm $81.12 100mm $113.57 150mm $167.65 200mm $227.14 250mm $329.89 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 21, 2004 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council SUBJECT: 2004-2008 Amending Financial Plan Bylaw No. 6225 - 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 2004 - 2008 Consolidated Financial Plan adopted by Council in December 2003 does not accurately represent the fii1auciãl 'plans of the District at the present time. Revisions have been rnàdë to respond to Council direction and more accurately reflect the current financial condition. The new Financial Plan must be adopted prior to May 15, 2004 and prior to the adoption of the Tax Rates Bylaw. RECOMMENDATION: That the Maple Ridge Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6225 - 2004 be read a first, second and third time. DISCUSSION: Background Context: The District is currently authorized to make expenditures under the 2004 - 2008 Financial Plan Bylaw No.6183 - 2003 that was adopted December 9, 2003. However, this plan is currently outdated and does not represent the financial conditions at this time. The changes to the financial plan are minor and reflect changes in the revenue and expenditure areas that have occurred since December 2003. The major issues that have been addressed in this new financial plan are: • Real growth in the tax assessment base that is lower than previously projected • Increase in the Grant in Lieu of Taxes • Adjustments to various revenue projections • Increase in the Provincial Gov't. Unconditional Grant related to traffic fines • Increased fuel, energy, electrical, communications and insurance costs • Funding for the 232 St. bridge • Purchase of the courthouse • Utility Funds: - finalized revenue and expenditure projections • Capital Program: - changes to respond to Council and community priorities Desired Outcome Adoption of the 2004 - 2008 Amending Financial Plan will enable the operating and capital programs to proceed as per the changed financial conditions and the appropriate rates and fee bylaws can be considered and adopted. Strategic Aligmnent: All departments prepared and presented a Business Plan, which then became the driver of their individual Financial Plans. These were achieved within the guidelines set in Business Planning Guidelines 7( Edition. This document is reviewed and amended annually in consultation with Council. Financial Plan/Business Plan Implications: The financial implications are represented in the schedule and appendices accompanying the bylaw. In summary, this bylaw will provide authorization for consolidated expenditures of $109M. However, $12.2M is for internal transfers to reserves. The following is an expenditure outline: • $41.6M - Capital Program • $50.7M Operating Expenditures, • $ 4.5M - Debt Service • $12.2M - Internal Reserve Transfers Thërevènue sources to fund the expenditures are as follows: • $36.3M - Property Taxation, Grants iLieu, Parcel Charges • $19.OM - Fees & Charges • $ 5.6M - Property Sales • $ 8.4M - Grants, Interest Income & Other • $15.7M - Developmem. Cost Charges • $24.OM - Internal Reserves & Surplus Since the 2004 - 2008 Financial Plan Bylaw No. 6183 - 2003 there have been revisions as a result of current financial conditions 'or corporate direction compared to the forecasts and assumptions in November/December 2003. The final four years of the plan have been adjusted based on current financial information. Citizen/Customer Implications & Communications: The implication to homeowners, businesses and industry is that they will experience a municipal tax increase and increase of utility charges. The amount will vary depending on the class and assessed value but will approximate 4%. In 2004, service levels will remain on par with 2003. The replacement of the 232nd St. bridge will improve safety, traffic flow and provide for easy expansion to 4 lanes in the future; street widening and improvements on 227 St. through a shared local improvement program will benefit business and customers in that immediate area An open invitation was extended to the public to attend any or all of the Business Plan presentations held during December 2003. Feedback was requested in person during question periods at the presentations, on the District's web• site, and to the telephone "budget hotline." Under the current "Open Government" structure the public has continuous access to present commentary and ask questions with regard to the changes, proposed. Policy Implications: None; all amendments- are as per statutory requirement and necessary to generate the revenues to provide municipal services within Maple Ridge. Alternatives: In the event this bylaw is not passed, the District is not authorized to make any expenditures other than those identified in Bylaw No. 6183 - 2003. This will require some operating changes to ensure that departments curtail or delay certain expenditures or programs to provide for the indrbàedcostsfOtenergy,fuelatidSafety -- CONCLUSIONS: The Five Year Financial Plan represents Council's vision and commitment to provide quality services to the residents of Maple Ridge. The Plan prOvides a forecast of the financial resources that are required to fund operations, programs and infrastructure for the current year and the following four years. As the Plan provides for a tax increase Council must adopt this Plan by by-law prior to adopting the Tax Rates By-law for 2004. Prepared by: Trevor Thompson, BBA Budget Officer Concurrence bobG.Sorba,CGA Director of Finance Approved by: aul Gill, BBA, CGA GM - Corp. & Financial Services Concurrence: / J. L. (Jim) Rule I Chief Administrative Officer JGS/jgs I CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6225-2004 A By-Jaw respecting the 5-year Financial Plan for the years 2004 through 2008 WHEREAS pursuant to Sectic.ji 165 of the Coimunity Charter, Council for the District of . Maple Ri•:ge has caused to be prepared a liriancial Plan for the years. 2004-2008; AND WHEREAS a public consultation process regarding the Financial Plan was undertaken by the District of Maple Ridge; . NOW, THEREFORE, Council for the District of Maple Ridge in open mebting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Amending Financial Plan By-law No. 6225-2004." Statement 1 attached hereto and made part of, this by-law is hereby declared to be the Financial Plan of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge for the years 2004 through 2008. READ.a.first.time this . ... .,... READ a second time this . READ a third time this. . . RECONSIDERED and adopted the YOR .PERK V Attachments: Statement 1 Attachment to Financial Plan Bylaw 6225-2004 Statement 1 Consolidated Financial Plan 2004-2008 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 REVENUES External Revenues PropertyTaxes $34,462,300 $36,655,186 $38,971,176 $41,056,549 $43,007,158 Parcel Charges $1,818,045 $1,858,820 $1,900,543 $1,935,734 $1,971,491 Fees & Charges $19,039,004 $1 9,552,88.1 $20,164,369 $20,860,832 $20,923,561 Interest 11,735,000 $1,725,000 $1,725,000 $1,725,000 $1,725,000 : Grants (Other Govts) $6,702,464 $2,685,579 $2,790,377 $2,247,197 $3,739,908 Property Sales $51550,000 $0 $0 $0 $O DevIoiment Fees LdvoperCostCharges $15,370,137 $4,450,819 $3,989,385 $4,352,591 $4,031,344 Developer Specified Projects $63,507 $0 $0 $15,750 $25,984 Parkland Acquisition $280,248 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Development Fees Total $15,713,892 $4,650,819 $4,189,385 $4,568,341 $4,257,328 Total External Revenues $85,020, 705 $67,128,285 $69, 740,850 $72,393,653 $75,624,446 Internal Revenues Borrowing Proceeds $0 $0 $18,588,754 $10,743,877 $350,000 Transfer from Resere Funds Land Reserve $858,342 $0 $0 $0 $0 Local Improvement Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Equipment Replacement Reserve $1,513,648 $1,967,750 $1,633,364 $591,828 $841,516 Sanitary Sewer Reserve $0 $487,565 $0 IT. 0 Capital Works Reserve $4,847,609 $499,000 $2,309,500 $36,000 $310,000 Fire Department Capital Reserve $931,546 $881,110 $1,637,500 $250,000 $1,750,000 Transfer from Reserve Fund Total $8,151,145 $3,835,425 $5,580,364 $877,828 $2,901,516 Transfer from Own Reserves $10,442,159 $4,671,719 $4,074,297 $4,606,541 $4,602,888 Transferfrom Surplus $5,376,456 $1,931,858 $0 $209,110 $o Total Internal Revenues $23,969760 $10,439,002 $28,243,415 $16,437,356 $7,854,404 TOTAL REVENUES $108,990,465 $77,567,287 $97,984,265 $88,831,009 $83,478,850 Expenditures External Expenditures - - Capital Expenditures $41,589,998, $14,997,259 $14,680,987 $10,572,818 $14,286,1 15 Principal Payments on Debt " $1,697,258 $1;597,224 $19,577,718 $11,514,845 $666,732 Interest Payments on Debt $2,822,313 $2,737,440 $2,369,376 . $2,262,252 $2,261 ,965 Other Expenditures $50,708;200 $51,099,579 $53,182,328 ' $55,681,464 $56,651,508 ToaI External Expenditures $96,817,769 $70,431,502 $89,810,409 $80,031,379 -$73,866,320 Internal Expenditures . Transfer to Reserve Funds Capital Works Reserve $663,239 $683,767 $705,702 $725,606 $745,747 Equipment Replacement Reserve $1,585,196 $1,672,597 $1,768,902 $1,800,374 $1,833,705 Fire Dept. Capital Aquisition $728,466 $769,521 $813,392 $853,200 $893,482 Land Reserve $20,000 . $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Local Improvement Reserve $0 " $0 $0 $0 $0 Sanitary Sewer Reserve - $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 Total Transfer to Reserve Funds $3,076,902 $3,225,885 $3,387,997 $3,479,180 $3,572,935 Contribution to Surplus ' $0 $0 $34,728 $0 $731,095 Contribution to Own Reserves $9,095,794 $3,909,900 $4,751,131 $5,320,450 $5,308,500 Total Internal Expenditures - '$12,172,696 $7, '135,785 $8,173,856 $8, 799,630 $9,612,530 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $108,990,465 $77,567,287 $97,984,265 $88,831,009 $83,478,850 S CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 08, 2004 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/076/03 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Bylaw Nos. 6206-2004 and 6207-2004 24181 113 Ave, 11378 240 Street and 11330 240 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is an application to amend Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan to reflect actual conservation boundaries based on survey and to make a minor adjustment to the land use designation boundary to fit the lot layout. The application also involves rezoning of the properties to RS-lb (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential), R-1 (Residential District), CD-1-93 (Amenity Residential District) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential). Rezoning these properties will permit the future subdivision into approximately 11 lots with a minimum area of 557m2 , approximately 29 lots with a minimum area of 37 1m2 and approximately 11 lots with a minimum area of 668m 2. RECOMMENDATIONS: That, acknowledging that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6206-2004 has been considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan, Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6206-2004 be read a first time and forwarded to Public Hearing; That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6207-2004 be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. Registration of a Rezoning Development Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; Road dedication of three meters along the 240k" Street frontage; InciuslonofthesiteintoSewerArea"A"; iv) Park dedication as required. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Paul Hayes Owner: Carl J. Ulmer, Constance A. Ulmer, Clifford D. Groom, Linda M. Wenzel And Jeremy W. Dodd Legal Description: Lot 12, Plan 50696, & Lots 4 & 5, Plan 21243 all of Section 15, Township 12, NWD 102...., OCP: Existing: Conservation, Compact Housing (30 upnh), Single Family Residential (5 upnh), & Single Family Residential (18 upnh) Proposed: Conservation, Compact Housing (30 upnh), Single Family Residential (5 upnh), & Single Family Residential (18 upnh) Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: R-1 (Residential District), RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density)Residential), RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), CD-1-93 Amenity Residential District Surrounding Uses: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property Access: Servicing: b) Project Description: Rural Residential Rural Residential Urban Residential 240' Street and 113 Avenue Full urban standard The subject site is bisected by Seigel Creek. The area on the west side of the creek is designated Single Family Residential (18 units per net hectare) (SFR 18) and Compact Housing (30 units per net hectare) (CH 30). The corresponding zones are RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density)Residential) for the SFR 18 and R-1 (Residential District) and CD-1-93 (Amenity Residential District) for the CH 30. The area on the east side of Seigel Creek is designated Single Family Residential (5 units per net hectare) (SFR 5). The corresponding zone is RS-ld (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential). The RS-ld zone prescribes a minimum parcel size of 2000 m 2 (half acre). However Part ifi - Area Structure Plan Policies of the Official Community Plan (OCP) provides for a density transfer of 2.5 units per net hectare of unbuildable lot area (Seigel Creek) which may be considered for the buildable portion of the site. Where the density transfer procedure option is selected the maximum density permitted for land designated SFR 5 is SFR 16. The corresponding zone for SFR 16 is RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential). It must be noted that the density transfer only applies to the same legal parcel that has environmentaly sensitive land and is not transferable to another legal parcel. The number of units available for transfer is calculated by determining the unbuildable area, less any area required through dedication for watercourse protection (5% of the site area). For the property located at 11330 240th Street, the density transfer is calculated as follows: Total unbuildable area 2.01 hectares Less 5% lot area 0.28 hectares Net nonbuildabie 1.73hectares-x 2.5-=-4.325-iinits eligible-for-densitytransfer. Total parcel area of 11330 240th Street 5.55 ha *Net area @ 30 upha 1.2519 ha x 30 = 37.56 *Net area @ 18 upha 0.4292 ha x 18 = 7.73 *Net area @ 5 upha 1.125 1 ha x 5 = 5.63 *Net area eligible for density transfer 1.73 ha x 2.5 = 4.33 Total allowable units = 55.25 Total units proposed = 44 *Net area calculated as the remainder after 5% park and road dedication -2- For the property located at 24181 113th Avenue, the density transfer is calculated as follows: Total unbuildable area 0.17 hectares Less 5% lot area 0.04 hectares Net non buildable 0.13 hectares x 2.5 = 0.33 units eligible for density transfer. Total parcel area of 11330 240th Street 0.81 ha *Net area @ 5 upha 0.61 ha x 5 = 3.05 *Net area eligible for density transfer 0.13 ha x 2.5 = 0.33 Total allowable units = 3.38 Total units proposed = 3 Of the potential density bonus, it appears the applicants will only be able to accommodate one extra lot on the portion of the lot east of Seigal Creek. No additional lots on the west portion of the site could be achieved as the applicants were under the maximum permitted density already with the geometry proposed. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: As noted above, the combined site has a number of Official Community Plan designations. The proposed subdivision geometry does not align with the existing designation boundaries. Accordingly, there are some minor conservation designation boundary adjustments proposed for Schedule "B". An Environmental Consultant working with a BC Land Surveyor has provided information that defines where the conservation boundary for Seigel Creek is located respecting the streamside protection regulations. The plan also identifies a tributary to Seigel Creek that flows along the east side of the property located at 24181 11 3th Avenue. Realignment of the conservation boundary for this creek is also necessary. These adjustments are illustrated on Map No.667 of Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6206-2004 attached. In addition, on the western portion of the site the boundary between the Single Family Residential (18 upnh) and the Compact Housing (30 units per net hectare) designations do not match exactly to the lot layout proposed. A minor adjustment to this boundary is required. DevelOpment Permits: The development site is located within Development Permit Areas XXVI and XXX. DPA XXVI was established to address protection of the natural environment. The boundaries of DPA XXVI includes the high and moderate environmental and high geological sensitivity areas of Albion as identified in the Resource Systems Management International report dated June 1993 and modified during the Albion public review process sessions. DPA XXX was established for the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment. Although not a condition of rezoning the developer must receive approval of a Development Permit prior to any work commencing on the properties. A Development Variance permit may be required at the subdivision stage to deal with an existing dwelling setback to new property lines and may also need to address servicing issues such as underground wiring. This will be reviewed in greater detail through the subdivision process. -3- Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was held on February 18, 2004 at the Albion Hall. The meeting was hosted by the applicant and was attended by the engineer, the environmental consultant and approximately 20 others. The applicant reported that there was no opposition to the proposal. Neighbours expressed an interest in availability for sewer connections and improvements to 113 Avenue and 243 Street. Interdepartmental Implications: Enaineerini! Denartment: The subject properties are located in the Albion urban area. Accordingly, this development is an urban subdivision and must be constructed to full urban standards. Engineering has confirmed that not all of the required services front the development site. Accordingly the Developer must enter into a Rezoning Development Agreement with the District and provide the security detailed in the agreement. As well the properties are not included in Sewer Area A. The applicant must submit an application to the District to have the properties included in Sewer Area A for billing purposes. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional 51 trees which is based on one tree per lot; final subdivision design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increaseiheir budget requirements by $1,275.00. Intergovernmental Issues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendments required for this application are considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined ter have no impact. 1) Environmental Implications: The District determines setback distances from watercourses based on the tenure of flow. Watercourses with a tenure of flow less than six months require a habitat protection area of 15 meters inland from the top of bank and watercourses with a tenure of flow of six months and longer require a habitat protection area of 30 meters inland from the top of bank. The environmental report, submitted with this application, concludes that Seigel Creek has a continuous flow of greater than six months. Accordingly, a habitat protection area of 30 meters inland from the top of bank is required as park dedication. The tributary to Seigel Creek collects water from the catchment area during rainfall events and then dries up. It does not -4- sustain continuous flows for a period of six months. Accordingly, a habitat protection area of 15 meters inland from the top of bank is required as park dedication. At the subdivision stage a disclosure statement will be required from a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act will be provided in accordance with the regulations. Geotechnical Implications: The geotechnical report submitted with the application provides some general recommendations for site preparation, building foundations and road construction. The report indicates that single family dwellings can be supported on conventional spread and strip footings. Regrading of the site will be required to facilitate the subdivision. This will involve a combination of filling of the lower flat area and cutting of the upper plateau. The use of retaining walls will likely be required. A detailed grading plan would be a normal requirement at the subdivision stage with additional geotecimical supporting information if required. CONCLUSION: That application RZ1076/03 be favorably considered and that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6206-2004 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6207-2004 be given first reading. Prepared by: '15avid Steve MCIP '4 Approved by: Ij*ank Quinn, P.Eng., PMP tM Public Works &'Øevelopment Services crrence: jY.-Vinij Rule Cef Administrative Officer DS/bjc -5- I 1 H Ow I I I I / I I' I i 8 (2 LTI 113 5 4 P 21243 II 3 113 AWJiL II PMM ID LOT 5 RAN 21243, AW OF LOT 12 RAN 15 iF. 12 N.W& SWAP 64 1' FL 10 L -\-z- H -- -.d -- 4 : Vt' -....fF -- ............... U- 7 g7 12 21 ROFO vN( 25 ø 5 , 24 it I 2-2 1 IJ 14f JMC wc & AMMTES LTD. 'TAT p Il p 34 RECEfl D : 'iAR 25 MAPLE R4Dt3E PLANNING DEPARTMENT CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6206-2004. A By-law to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the. Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "B" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amendment By-law No. 6206-2004." That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 12, Section 15, Township 12, Plan 50696, New Westminster District; Lot 4, Section 15, Township 12, Plan 21243, New Westminster District; and Lot 5, Section 15, Township: 12, Plan 21243, New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 667, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, are hereby redesignated as shown. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan By-law No. 5434-1996 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of A.D. 200. PUBLIC. HEARING ILDJhe... - day..of - - ,AiI..20Q. READ A SECOND TIME the day of A.D. 200. READ A THIRD TIME the day of A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the dayof ,A.D.200. MAYOR CLERK 33 1 I P 137861 U.OUflO P 10848 32 11475 11474 I 31 11467 2.094 ho 30 2.964 ho 0.988 1.9 ho 14 ,,4J41 2 C) 0 N 11442 1/425 N 3 CL 1.968 ho 11415 31 1 11416 *PP045 A 11403 RP 8357 AV _______________ 11394 "397L 2 0.405 ho 4 C P14 12 13 1/363 -( 5 ho 21243 0.809 0.809 ho 5.556ho _ '7 113 AVE. 0 jjj /1330 P 5(696 0.9 15 11299 1 0.809 ho 1.214 ho 1/300 (N (0 0 (N -) I __________ ALE P1DOE OFFCAL C OMMUN ...TYPLAN Bylaw No. 6206-2004 Map No. 667 From: Conservation, Compact Housing(30 units per net hectare), Single Family Residential(5 units per net hectare) and Single Family Residential(18 units per net hectore) To: iiJ Conservation L Single Family Residential(18 units per net hectare) L[LLI Compact Housing(30 units per net hectare) Single Family Residential(5 units per net hectore) CA14% A MAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12 September, 1874 1:2500 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6207-2004 A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6207-2004." Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 12, Section 15, Township 12, Plan 50696, New Westminster District; Lot 4, Section 15, Township 12, Plan 21243, New Westminster District; and Lot 5, Section 15, Township: 12, Plan 21243, New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1322 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, are hereby rezoned as shown. Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. MAYOR CLERK I 0.988 ha I 14 I L 11441) 0 2 0 11442 N. 11425 30283 1.968 ha 22031 1 11416 *PP045 A 11403 RP 8357 , To 31 22 S - - 11363 : -: : - : : - : : : H : 5 0.89 0. P 21243 5556ho 113 AV P 5(696 15 112.99 1 0.809 ha 1.214 ho 11300 F') c'J 2 /1263 11247 a- 0.779 ho 11250 11213 I n I A MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6207-2004 Map No. 1322 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: E= RS—lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) CD—i —93 (Amenity Residential District) 11111111111 R-1 (Residential District) F1x??11 RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Moak ~M~; A MAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12 September, 1874 SCALE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 13, 2004 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/120/03 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Bylaw Nos. 6218- 2004 and 6219 - 2004 23608 to 23628 Dewdney Trunk Rd. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is an application for an Official Community plan Amendment to redesignate the subject lands to Compact Housing (40 units per net hectare) on Schedule "B" and place the lands into a Development Permit Area. The application also involves rezoning of the properties to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) for the area fronting Dewdney Trunk Road and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) for the remainder, which would front onto 236 Street. The Official Community Plan amendment and rezoning would facilitate the development of nine new units and retention of two existing dwellings. RECOMMENDATIONS: That, acknowledging that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw 62 18- 2004 has been considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan, Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw 62 18-2004 be read a first time and forwarded to Public Hearing; and That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6219-2004 be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing. a) Background Context: Applicant: Haney Projects Ltd., Phil Cooper Owner: Ruona Asplund, Jana Kunik, Kwan Yee Chow Legal Description: Lot 42, 43 & 44 all of Section 16, Township 12, Plan 20770, NWD OCP: Existing: Single Family Residential (18 Units Per Net Ha) Proposed: Compact Housing (40 units per net hectare) Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: Surrounding Uses: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Access: Servicing: Previous Applications: RN/I-i (Townhouse Residential) R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Residential Residential Residential a lane off of 236 Street exists SD/01/91, LU/78/03 Project Description: The development site consists of three parcels, two of the lots have existing homes which are intended to stay. It is 0.430 hectares in size and is located on the southeast corner of Dewdney Trunk Road and 236 Street. There are two separate zones proposed; R-3 (Special Amenity Residential) for the north portion of the development site and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) for the south portion. There are no watercourses on the site and therefore staff will be recommending that Council require 5% payment in lieu of parkiand dedication at the time of subdivision. The following is a brief description as it relates to each of the proposed zones: . R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District): The development proposal shows five lots fronting Dewdney Trunk Road. The two existing homes will remain on two of the lots and therefore only three new dwelling units will be constructed. All of the lots will be restricted to vehicular access from a new lane that will be constructed off 236 Street. Relocation of the two existing driveways will be required. The development plan provides for three on-site parking spaces for each of the dwellings. The proposed most eastern lot will be larger to accommodate the existing home and would have future development potential if the house was removed. It will require a Development Variance Permit for the rear yard set back prior to subdivision due to the location of the new lane in relation to this existing dwelling. . RM-1 (Townhouse Residential): The development proposal is for six detached townhouses on a lot fronting 236 Street. Vehicular access will be provided from the new lane to a common driveway for two of the units and by way of direct access to the lane for three other. One of the units will take vehicular access from 236 Street. A common walkway through the center of the site will provide pedestrian access and link the units to 236 Street. The units contain approximately 173 square metres of floor area and will have ground floor living with bedrooms above. All units have been provided a two-car garage. Three visitor parking spaces have been provided noting that some on-street parking is available on 236th Street. There is no minimum bylaw requirement for visitor parking. The density proposed on this portion of the site is 37 units per net hectare. The applicant intends to subdivide the site into six bare land strata lots. Both the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) lots and the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) lots will be subject to Development Permit XLI for the form and character of the intensive residential use. An Official Community Plan amendment is required to include the lands into this Development Pnflit Ar. - Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: Schedule "B": An amendment to Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan from Single Family Residential (18 units per net hectare) to Compact Housing (40 units per net hectare) is required to accommodate the development proposal. This amendment is supported as it responds to the existing densities to the west across 236 th Street and to the north across Dewdney Trunk Road. -2- The proposal also meets the intent to have lots fronting Dewdney Trunk Road with rear lane access to a lane and the lot layout fits the historical lotting pattern without a larger assembly. Higher densities in the area may also assist the timing of redevelopment given the established lotting patterns and the existing improvements, primarily the large industrial building two lots to the east. The detached housing on bare land strata lots on the townhouse site would be consistent with Policy 28 b) as it provides a choice in housing tenure. 28. Policy: Bare Land Strata title development will be considered for all residential densities where: Alternative development forms will provide the flexibility required to protect significant natural amenities. This will typically occur with residential densities at or lower than 15 units per net hectare, accommodated by the RG, RG-2 and RG-3 Zones. The form of development is detached housing within the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone, as a means of providing choice in tenure. Schedule "A" & "H": It will be necessary to amend Schedule "A" & "H" of the Official Community Plan to include the site into Development Permit Area XLI. Development Permits: Development Permit XLI: The site will be included into Development Permit XLI as part of the Official Community Plan amendment. This Development Permit Area applies to intensive residential development with densities ranging from 3 0-60 units per net hectare with fee simple or bare land strata lots and will apply to both of the proposed zones under application. The Development Permit will address design guidelines for the site, including: • Site circulation Building form and character Landscaping of private space Establishing the detailed configuration and setbacks for the bare land strata lots. Advisory Design Panel: The Advisory Design Panel will be asked to comment on the Townhouse portion of this site at the development permit stage. Council will be advised at that time of any comments and their resolution. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was held on March 24, 2004. Six people were in attendance from the neighbourhood. The main concerns were: • The need for a traffic light at the intersection at Dewdney Trunk Road and 236 Street. -3- • The density was of concern to one of the neighbours as it would impact on privacy. In response the applicant provided the unit design showing that no windows would be provided on the second floor, thereby not intruding upon privacy. Citizen/Customer Implications: The closest school is Alexander Robinson Elementary School. The School Board has advised that it is at capacity and that any new elementary aged school children would go to Blue Mountain Elementary School at 248 Street. Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has advised that all the services are available on the street to support this rezoning application and that all the other required services for the future lots will be provided through the subdivision process. They have also advised that the traffic light for the corner of Dewdney Trunk Road and 236 Street is included in the Capital Budget for 2006. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional 10 trees which is based on one tree per lot; final subdivision design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $250.00. Fire Department: The Fire Department has advised that they have no objections to this development given that all the buildings will be sprinkled and the townhouse units will be addressed to 236 Street. t) Intergovernmental Issues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882ofthe Act. The amendment recuire&forthisapphcatron, is to Schedule -"B" is considered- to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. -4- CONCLUSION: This proposal for Official Community Plan Amendments and rezoning is to the development of nine new dwelling units with retention of two existing homes. It is recommended that Council give first reading to Bylaws 6218 - 2004 and 6219 - 2004 and refer those bylaws and this application to Public Hearing. J&,VCtA:op4 Prepared by: Gay McMillan ane PickrinWCP, MCIP Approved by:ftrank Quinn, P.Eng., PMP GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer GM/bjc -5- 2 12099 LMS 988 - CP6847 LMP 9544 FPA7R]K UBJECT PROPERTIES 222120191 LrVP 2526 P 83835 Rem 1 LANE W 11987 i RemA P 0770 Rem I 80.7 8 PcI. of E [11978 11977 Rem3 Ao17 c) C\I 11958 1/2 B 45 7 P 83835 1196 04 11046 (0 Cl) 46 N- 11953 I— N o5 11936 Ii — o 0 4 11941 11926 P 20770 I 11929 [119.3 48 3 LMP 7307 11917 c'i 2 1 213 456 j11905 1190 k I 1I9AVE. 119AVE. 11899 I I ii 10 1 111898 E 11899 8.7 =2' 11880 BlloI9I8 j12 8 "A" I LMPI 273th7 I I 11887 11888 Distn:tof - Pitt Meadows! - Valley PLAN 20770 LOTS 42, 43 & 44 CORPORATION OF t!tO;bton b THE DISTRICT OF N MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE Langley Tho,nIjuI Incorporated 12, September, 1874 PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ SCALE 1:2,000 River BY: PC DATE: Nov 19, 2003 FILE: RZI120/03 / CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6218 - 2004. A By-law to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "A", "B" & "H" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amendment By-law No. 6218 - 2004." Schedule "B" is hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 42, Except: Parcel A (Reference Plan LMP326), Section 16, Township 12, Plan 20770, New Westminster District; and Lot 43, Except: Part dedicated Road on LMP4233, Section 16, Township 12, Plan 20770, New Westminster District; and Lot 44, Except Part dedicated Road on Reference Plan LMP786, Section 16, Township 12, Plan 20770, New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 672, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, is hereby redesignated to Compact Housing (40 units per net hectare). - Schedule "A" is hereby amended by adding the following in correct numerical order to Subsection (B) of Development Permit Area XLI in the Appendix: Lot 42, Except: Parcel A (RP LMP326); Lot 43, Except: Part dedicated Road on LMP4233; & Lot 44, Except Part dedicated Road on RP LMP786, all of Sec. 16, Tp .12, Plan 20770, NWD (RZ/120/003) Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6218 - 2004 Page 2 Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 42, Except: Parcel A (Reference Plan LMP326), Section 16, Township 12, Plan 20770, New Westminster District; and Lot 43, Except: Part dedicated Road on L1V1P4233, Section 16, Township 12, Plan 20770, New Westminster District; and Lot 44, Except Part dedicated Road on Reference Plan LMP786, Section 16, Township 12, Plan 20770, New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 672, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw, are hereby designated as Development Permit Area XLI (16) on Schedule "H". Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Designation By-law No. 5434-1996 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED the dayof A.D. MAYOR CLERK \\ 14 6.961 ho. 120.8 LM /20 II 2 0 120BAVE. un 3.156 ho 12099 II o_ II J —J H LMS 988 LMP 9545 ________ LMP LMP - in Rem PcI. 2 of PcI. LP 9545 M CP6847 c..J EP 1734 20.0 DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. (1 RW 58913 _______ .MP i -) 787 BCP18351 lr) cc'j 2 o 30 E E E MP3164 RP 57263 1rRP 86679LMp16374 0.931 ho hi L41P 2 *29 .464 BCPi835 LIi) 83835 a ii) = IX IX __________ Rem LANE ____ _____ ff4c-4 Rem A P 207' 0 W / ;988 Rem 807 cN 8 16g 119 .613 ho 1.645 ho CN PcI. ________ ______E 1/97. (N /1978 Rem3 Aof7 _ 1/2 ' is 20 B P83835 45 o -5_I 1/9561/96 __________ (I) 77945 N 0 6 15.0 14 /19' II _._J L ------ N 46 ° N - LMP 8074 1/95 1/9540. 13 /193 N 7 Th ---------- - /1936 ______ ______ 0.506 ho Q 7193 - 8 RP 831 2\>, / o 1/: 1/925 P 20770 in //92 //9J0 48 (N 3 N li c' /191. 10 ______ CN 2001LMP1 I 1/91 11918 2 2 10 /190. Nil '77 HI213I415 5.0 _______ 6 If) i i i i I 11905' //906 N 1190/ In 12_/ 9 / 0 119 AVE. d 0 119 AVE. r'l 11888 'h8.0( N / /8991 15. ?1 il 10 I I l I i I 11898 I V 8 7892 1 ( 1188?I 9181 7 '12 I If 2 In 8 I "A" ILIVIR 1188 2 307 /1888 TOTAL AREA: 2.58 ho ________ I 11870 I 13 7 I MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN' AMENDING - Bylaw No. 6218-2004 Map No. 671 From: Single Family Residential(18 units per net hectare) To: Compact Housing(40 units per net hectare) AMAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12 September, 1874 1:2500 \\ 6.961 ho. 1206 II LM II /20 liLt) 2 ° 00 1206,AVE. ii (3) 3.156 ho 12099 Ii 3985 - -------------- —J ii LMS 986 LMP 9545 LMP LMP Rem PcI. 2 of PcI. CP6847 N LMP 9545 T(T EP 1734 _ C 7a - 20.0 N DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. -i N RW 58913 - \ / MP31 64 N RP 57263 1rRP 86679 LMP 16374 RW BCP183611 , ILL 'ctr') " I2 2 j2g 30 Il_____ 2 ci E E E 0.931 ho 4 hc LP - 181 .46 1197 2 BCP 183 _____ 83835 LLI : 1MP Rem LANE I 1196 N RemA I W t i98 P 20T 0 Rem /1988 LO ____ Ii I 80.7 8 1.645 ho PcI. 16 Lfl 1 195 4 L) .613 ho ii Rem 3 of E (N A of 7 f/975 (N _______ (N N. / 194 1/2 7 cL 15 20 B 45 - 7 (0 11955_1 P 83835 0 r') 11966 1194 6 15,0 6 1 1946 0 14 18.0 /19 ii 4( 0 (N LMP 8074 5 /1954o 13 1/9J• - N-7 1/9 0.506 ho N 47 ______ ______ I. 8 /1942w 1192. 77 RP 8312\>, 4,í 1/926 P 20770 LI) 1/92. //9J0 _______ 48 (N3 N. 11 cli 1/9/, 10 77 0) _____04 1191. LMPI I I 2 307 20.0 .L/ i 11918 ca 1/90 112131415 6 > 50 r—fl 77 '-.I'\ ( //905 1 1906 11 N. /190/ N 12 / /4 g _ 119 AVE. 0 119 AVE. L )i •LJ% 11)1 18.0 1' 10 N- /1899 11 I I I_______ 11899 15.O 8 I 0 1 (1/888 //88I j_7H12 I I 1 In 'A" 8 I:~2 ____ 2307 1/885 1897) TOTAL AREA: 2.56 ho _________ /158 ___ 1 1570 I I I I rI MAPLE RI'DGEO'FRCIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6218-2004 Map No. 672 PURPOSE: TO DESIGNATE AS DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA XLI(16) 0AN A an MAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12 September, 1674 1:2500 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6219 - 2004 A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6219 - 2004." Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 42, Except: Parcel A (Reference Plan LMP326), Section 16, Township 12, Plan 20770, New Westminster District; and Lot 43, Except: Part dedicated Road on LMP4233, Section 16, Township 12, Plan 20770, New Westminster District; and Lot 44, Except Part dedicated Road on Reference Plan LMP786, Section 16, Township 12, Plan 20770, New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line is hereby rezoned to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) and that portion shown hatched is hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) as shown on Map No. 1324, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law. Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of 200. MAYOR CLERK 14 LM . 120 2 0 120BAVE. U, 3.156 ho 12099 LMS 988 LM LMP 9545 LMP LMP 9546'.L to r-. Rem PcI. 2 of PcI. BP91 EP 1 734 DFWDNFY TRLJNJK RI) \\ 6.961 ho. Ln II H 0) 1/ BCP183d L 2 ------- BCP 183I _L_ ------ - 83835 W _ - Rem A 1.645 ho .613 ho I B P83835 83836 LMP 327 L 787 MP 3164 RP 57263 ,RP 86679LMP16374 U, N I / 197. 2 E E E 0.931 ho .464 hc LNIP I I I 229 Rem W I LANE rc 11988 t 1196, (0 1/98 Rem 80.7 8 0) 16 1195. . Rem 3 PcI. Aof of E 1/2 1 7 11978 15 1/94 5 I 45 . — 7 I/965- 1/966 1194. ° 6 15,0 14 _______ 11946 N 46 .— o LN4P 8074 1195 //93 N 7 _______ , 13 0.506 ho ______ ______ 11936 °- 0 //9j 8 ___ 4//94 1 942 1/92 1 1926 P 20770 LII 1192: //9J0 RP 8312\>, _______ /191 10 48 3 N- _________ 0) LMP I I 2 307 119/. 11918 c'j 1190 20.Ot 2 10 N 11 Ln I 1 2131415 6 5.0 __ 1F905 ____ 11906 11901 -ui —j gl2_/ I 301 ('4 119 I 20 I 18.0 P7 U) N' (N o 0 o I19AVE. I ii I I I I (° I 10 '° Ni I 7 __ , (11888 I ci Cs11 'OI'OT 180 IN. 1F899 15. :8 I I l 189 [11898 11897 1 I B'- I //880IIjIl12 I 11892 (0 ____ _________ / 18821 I 8 I I 2) :1886 11888 I 11870 __LM23071 131_I_7 lb_I 119 AVE. "A" TOTAL AREA: 2.58 ho MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6219-2004 Map No. 1324 From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) To: R-3(Special Amenity Residential District) and RM-1(Townhouse Residential) shown hatched OMNI= MAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12 September, 1874 A 1:2500 Isom omh oAh + S.L6 •. ift Aft J~EMSTINGRESIDF2CE E C ti I( \I j H L014 IYPEA rr III 3O5Q I TYPEA LOT3 0 LOT 2 am • + .,-'.-- - - PRWATEDRIVEWAY - - L:!1_Ll I iJLI TYPEB TYPEC IF F Ji ;J s12 II ---------- --- EXISTING RESIDENCL L t L i TYPE B li~ TI -: TYPEC'[T L\4 -- ----- - I I J Castle SITE PLAN SCAi2/3T - •__,-__... DEWDNEYTRUNKROD& iI• --r---n f__ri ii Li •-JJ -'J-' 25Gth ST RE E T L ii L_i. ii I_..L_1 L:rx......JJ MAPLERIDOE8.C. FEDL1tO4 ,T.V, 12 256th S T R E E T STREETSCAFE DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD STREETSCAPE Castle d.e.s.i .g.n .s I PROPOSED RESIDENTL DEVELOPMENT DEWONEY TRUNK ROAD A 236th STREET MAPLE RIDGE, B.C. zr-o. - '- -: SWECK LIL om 0 uuri_ .......... EDROO TqELOW L GR UPPER FLOOR PLAN AZk 659 SQif MAIN FLOOR PLAN ASEk9I5SQFF. 1/4I-D 5CAIZ I/4l-O Castle de's• •g.n •s PROPOSED RESIDENTiAL DEVELOPMENT TYPE SEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD 62301K STREET - MAPLE ROSE, B.C. I II II -------------- ThM V N — — — fli IOWDHI HAIL LWmmHAIL __ / L 11 BASEMENT PLAN AVEk9ISQ!T. SCAth I/Il'-O' TYPE "All Castle d.e.s.i.g.n .s PROPOSED RESIDENTIAl. DEVELOPMENT DEWENEY TRUNK ROAD & 238TR STREET - MAPLE RIDGE, H.C. 2 op4 RIGHT ELEVATION TYPE "A" REAR ELEVATION SCM I14 Castle d.e.s.i.g.n.s PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DEWONEY TRUNK ROAD 523615 STREET MAPLE RIDGE. B.C. FSIL24 X1JOR fiftft 0 trc o 0 0 0 0 LEFF ELEVATION SCA1: I/4I- FRONT ELEVATION W13 FRONT ELEVATION FRO1 uyr4 LOT2 ALTERNATE ELEVATIONS TYPE "A" Castle d.e.si.g.n.s PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DEWONEVTRUPA ROAO & 238TH STREET t38PLE RIDGE. B.C. - 4 rp LOWER FLOOR PLAN SCAII 1/4-O •1 - ------.J L----------------------------- Ur DmROOM F\JJ HHii. II-Sd5-Q MASTER DEDROOM L — 2—k OIflCE/SITJDY IO,-s12-IO, II EEDROOM • '-.-- _____ .-OdO6 LIRY I ••• UPPER FLOOR PLAN AiEkIO25SQST. SCAj2 I14'1.O rL5 Si. I 40 SL.S TO SE BUILT MIRRGR REVtRSED TYP E "B" Castle d.e.s.i.g .n .s PROPOSED RESIDENTW DEVELOPMENT DEWDNEV TRUNK ROAD A 236TR STREET MPJ'LE RIDGE. B.C. I 3 IJ iii; 1!UIL LEFF A MII/1 flcaInl ® ,i,t Cfl != • '.'-1 U I_I_I_II_I_I I_l_II_I_I I I GHTELEVAON.I;4I TXTE - = : Castle d•e•s• i•g•n -s PROPOSEC RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OEWDNEV TRUNK ROAD 1 238TH STREET M#PLE RIDOK, B.C. FESA1IA4 I IICM :____ :: - - L SECTION A-A SCl/4=lO Castle d.e .s. i.g.n .s PROPOSED RESIDENI1AL DEVELOPMENT TYPE ? 0EV/ONES TRUNK ROAST 6 236TH STREET MORLE RIDGE. B.C. 3V3 PIIIIIIJ[IIIII1 JI1H IITtT FAMILY ROOM fl-RxJ4'-3 ' - 4 .___4rI... DINING YEE h I I I / :MLh1 'L1) LOWER FLOOR PLAN SCAIIL /41'-r UPPER FLOOR PLAN AREA 1025SQ!T. SCALD I/4lLO' LQT5 51. 1 A1'1D 51.5 10 B BUILT MIRROR REVERIED TYPE "C" Castle d.e.s. i .9.n.s PROPOSED RESIDEN11AL. DEVELOPMENT DEWDNEYIRUNI< ROAD & 230TH STREET MAPLE RIDGE, S.C. NRV.I&2R0 IWMJ - r:1 EXTBJOR FINISH 0 WWS MI1VBVLOI* GJ at5rB.mwLgw. ® ® 2N&1AWt41N (Tj .niw,ui @ € I LEFT ELEVATION -------------- --------------- _., . FRONT ELEVATION SCAI l/4lO' DEVELOPMENT T REARELEVA11ON,4• DEWONEYTRUNEROAD - %lII/ MVELE RIDDE, B.C. WV.1L2003 I— Ian-, Castle d9.s.i.g.n .s - .. ____.l... ------ .------------------------- J.------ i. BATHRM WIC rIASuWI FOYER FOWDER DOUBAICAHAGE GBAWISPAcE SECTION A-A SCAlD 1/4'l- IN - nTE "C" Castle d.e.s.i.g.n .s PROPOSED RESIDENT1M. DEVELOPMENT _____ CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Development Permit 23315 Dewdnev Trunk Rd DATE: March 29. 2004 FILE NO: DP/031/04 ATTN: CofW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Development Permit application has been submitted for the above described property, approval of which will permit construction of commercial space with a residential unit occupying the second floor. After reviewing the plans. the Planning Department recommends that DP/031/04 be given favorable consideration. This project was previously approved by Council at the February 26. 2002 meeting under application DP/048/99. RECOMMENDATION: That the Municipal Clerk be authorized to sign and seal DPI031/04 respecting property located at 23315 Dewdney Trunk Rd. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Zoning: Existing: Surrounding Uses North: South: East: West: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Access: Servicing: Previous Applications: b) Project Description: Hubert Cuiham Architect Hubert Culham Taha Enterprises Inc Lot 1. Section 21, Township 12, Plan LMP38 174 Neighbourhood Commercial C-i (Neighbourhood Commercial) Residential Residential Residential Residential Vacant Commercial/Residential Dewdney Trunk Road and Glenhurst Street Full urban A Development Permit application has been submitted which would allow the construction of a mixed use building with approximately 400m of commercial space on the ground floor and approximately 124m2 of residential space on the second floor. This project was approved by Council February 26, 2002 under application DP/048/99. However the project did not commence and the Development Permit lapsed after one year. Noting that the project is the same, the attached report dated February 8, 2002 provides the Planning Analysis and Advisory Design Panel review. qo'f CONCLUSION: That DP/03 1/04 be given favorable consideration. Z~3~ Prepared by: David Stevenson Pliihw Technician Approved by: FrXnk Quinn, P.Eng., PMP GM: PubliWorks & Development Services Concurrence: J. V. (JitiiTRule Cl4ef Administrative Officer DS'bjc CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor A. Hogarth DATE: February 08,2002 and Members of Council FILE NO: DP1048/99 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: DP/048/99 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Development Permit application has been submitted for the above described property, approval of which will permit construction of commercial space with a residential unit above. After reviewing the plans, the Planning Department recommends that DP/048/99 be given favourable consideration. RECOMMENDATION: That the Municipal Clerk be authorized to sign and seal DP1048/99 respecting property located at 23315 DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. BACKGROUND: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses N: S: W: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Access: Servicing: Previous Applications: TAHA ENTERPRISES INC TAHA ENTERPRISES INC Lot: 1, Plan: LM038 174 Neighbourhood Commercial No Change C-i (Local Commercial) No Change Residential Residential Residential Residential Vacant Neighbourhood Store and Residential Dewdney Trunk Road Full Urban RZ/005/97 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A Development Permit application has been submitted for the above described property which would allow the construction of a mixed use building with approximately 400m2 of commercial space on the ground floor and 124m2 of residential space on the second floor. The subject property is in Development Permit Area XXXII and prior to issuance of a Building Permit, a Development Permit is required. PLANNING ANALYSIS: The property is zoned C-i (Local Commercial), which does permit the proposed uses, and is designated Development Permit Area XXXII, on Schedules "A & H" of the Official Community Plan. The Development Permit Area guidelines state that: • Building siting must ensure adequate site circulation and safe access to public streets; • Attention should be paid to street front image; • Site design to give precedence to pedestrian use over vehicular use; • Building design to mimic recent residential construction in the neighbourhood; • Street-front landscaping to incorporate street trees for to define site boundaries and enhance public space; and • Parking areas may be limited to the requirementsof the accessory residential use. The building is sited to the south east portion of the property. This promotes pedestrian access from th public sidewalks and restricts vehicle use to the side and rear of the building. Stucco siding, brick venee. - and asphalt shingle materials will be used to assimilate the building with the neighbourhood. Trees, shrubs and ground cover will be used on all areas not covered by the building and hard surfaces. The parking area requirements for the accessory residential use were removed from the C-i zone as part of the commercial zone study. However, the parking areas have been reviewed and those for the residential use are located adjacent to the residential entry on the north side of the building. The continuous landscape strip will screen the parking from the adjacent street. Respecting the aforementioned, the guidelines for the development proposal have been satisfactorily addressed. ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL: The application was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel on December 6, 2001. The Panel expressed overall support for the project subject to the following conditions: • That the applicant consider a different solution for the garbage facility in relation to the adjacentdoorsfor.reasons .of.naturaL.surveillance.and safety; • That the applicant provide a pedestrian walkway with appropriate surface treatment to the residential unit off Glenhurst Street, and to the residential and commercial component from the west side off Dewdney Trunk Road. The applicanthasaccommodated these changeson re-vised drawings. Prier-to-issuance-of-a Bui1diig - Permit a security based on 2 ½ % of the construction value will be required to ensure that construction occurs in compliance with the Development Permit. -2- INTERGOVERNMENTAL ISSUES: N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS: N/A CITIZEN/CUSTOMER IMPLICATIONS: N/A INTERDEPARTMENTAL IMPLICATIONS: N/A FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: N/A ALTERNATIVES: N/A SUMMARY: As the proposed mixed use development complies with the objectives and guidelines of Development Permit Area XXXII, it is recommended that DP/048/99 be given favourable consideration. MSkpW ' Approied by: Frank Quinn Mi GMblic Work & Development Services .'L-L Concurrence: Robert W. Robertsón, AICP, MCIP Chief Administrative Officer DS/jvt -3- 0 0 '2 CO C" 11991 11987 11975 11963 11953 ---__ J/ 11949 12071 12093 2092 I 2100 12085 I C") 2076 12079 12073 2090 55 12067 2066 12061 1 12080 CI) of - 12051 - 12059 2058 12070 12041 12051 Z 2 12060 W 2050 12033 - 2032 :2 2050 12023 Ii 112040 ' u 4lUI4I1IIuIuIrj id)! 12005 I - 1701 12004 12003 ( Cv i CV 12010 Ct')' p2030 t4 DEWDNEY IRK RD ] 98 J (JCC IC4 I 11980 11997 11991 11971 11970 11987 11961 11964 11981 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge 11943 makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy or I present status of the information shown on _J this map. 119831 1952 11948 1936 N I =w- -,I 23315 Dewdney Trunk Road v " SCALE: 1:1,500 KEY MAP -ORPC RATION C I THE DISTRICTOF LAAE MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE ThOfl Incorporated 12, September, 1874 PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Feb 5 2002 FILE: DP1048199 BY: DS - — fl• 1t• 54' (.nn..) 40.0' 5% :zi.Cf}S l-L 'I f4. ,.—.-- . LOODIMI .0 IMSU. 450 . n % • 4) — + I . -. w hiiI 01. I _j SIE40904 Sd COMMLDCI4L PAK%I.r,PACL 1110 d LCON D FLOOR PLAN I .. •... ;L4 "."L- *vtti. 4LLpo&4 5414 \ 4 PROJ[CT DATA • ..____ 4 '5 • S4.i,$) •Jo.o' - • . - •• .•: .. •...•. . I0 _______ ____________________ ::. • 4. . - -..• .. 4..' ... .. S. .•. Si.4 4520 P4 N I - 9 ,; WnIS4 I 4000S 4' 5 C (i-s M'D47 pI1Ifl 500, DWO9LT TRUHE ROAD. i so ILCAL DUCRIPTION tots ,, 4 IS •.c.r4 ?WacD (ts.. pI.As.,e.aL,,) s55Tos 2, I E P LA N e- o i / '. 4. 40i 0-4 MAIN FLOOR PLAN .01415 0DS04 .1II4. SOS'S 0S4S, tROt S.,rsI. 55055 •C005Do 0040 441., 0 . 12 VERTICU. tLCVtTC TS ARE MLIC. LLCLND FACtO 45* SITS 1151*1100 t4R50 SOIlSrj0S. rEt . w • wz ct ' I - Lw Ir :P -------4 RIO •S a lStOEP0L dAN 14.1004 - .14 50015100' 14 IIYISIONS 'Os COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IrANA ENTERPRISES LTD. MAPLE RIDGE B.C. SlOWING SITE PLAN rLOOR PLANS PROJECT DATO 10,50 2001.1 SCAlE i/8. ,. ON. it CII. IC DAT! sIr-t 10 1Q01 IWO NO SLY ; NO ir SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION .1p•0.1LT IUI$GLL *00w STllD P.OM DPN.I* P10 OIl P.I0 1100* aM WOOD PO4.4 CtWtMTPAIOWLO fl.lII'?IO. flIW&CI 040110$ L0401IID, 1TP,ISIOD. lr.M,wr.D 0L4*0 4 LLOh.uflIO4 tLofll*fl -WOWflttkltTIfl bAUM •TAIMlD $U.UMINA700 SICK SAID .flOPOOI.fll 3TU4. .WIOD0O1; 00*1.4110*100000 1*4441. 1.110 r0IPlT CORPORATION OF TILE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 01. 2004 and Members of Council FILE NO: SD/108/02 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: 5% Money in lieu of parkiand dedication (23573 Kanaka Way) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The above noted subdivision is subject to both Policy 8 of the Official Community Plan and the provisions of the Local Government Act regarding parkiand dedication or payment of money in lieu. It is recommended that Council require money in lieu of parkiand dedication for property located at 23573 Kanaka Way. RECOMMENTATION: That pursuant to Council's policy regarding 5% Parkland Dedication or payment of Money In Lieu, be it resolved that the owner of land the subject of SD/108/02 (23573 Kanaka Way) shall pay to the District of Maple Ridge an amount that is not less than $60,000.00. DISCUSSION: Policy 8 of the Official Community Plan states that in order to preserve watercourses, an owner of land being subdivided shall, at the option of Council either: Provide park land or an amount not to exceed 5% of the land being subdivided in a location acceptable to Council; or Pay to the Municipality an amount that equals the market value of up to 5% of the land that may be required for parkland purposes. Where there is a significant watercourse and the District has the ability to include ravines and watercourse protection areas into the public realm, that area is dedicated Park. These areas provide for large vegetated areas in urban neighbourhoods that provide corridors for wildlife and passive park areas for residents. Where there is either no watercourse or the watercourse is deemed insignificant, 5% of the marked value of the land is paid to the District. These funds are placed into a special Parkiand Acquisition Reserve Fund, which enables the District to purchase areas deemed important for habitat protection but where the ability to achieve parkland through development is limited, such as the Blaney Bog. In this particular instance there is no watercourse present and it is, therefore, recommended that money in lieu of parkland dedication be provided. C/050, In keeping with past practice the District has requested that an appraisal be provided for the 5% market value of the development site. This appraisal is based on zoned but not serviced land. An opinion from an appraisal firm has stated that the market value of the land is $ 1.200,000.00, which indicates that the 5% value of this property is $60,000.00. CONCLUSION: As there are no watercourses on the property it is recommended that Council require money in lieu of parkiand dedication as prescribed in the appraisal. Prepared by: Da Technician \ Approj1Sane ering, M.C.I.P irector of Plan g 44 -- Approved bY' Frank Quinn G : PubS Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. L. ( im) Rule Administrative Officer DS/bjc -2- C/) c'S) CD 11224 Rem 4 P 24650 U I 11264 P41673 11195 / Part SE. 1/4 Sec.l6Tp. 12 LMP 33811 112AVE. I 10 I—. (ID P11216 LU Subject Property (I) w LU 12-1 0 12 Li 2 KANAKA WAy /2 / 3 /4 I 5 i Il717TT W436° co 22 / The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge 20 makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy / . or present status of the information shown on 0 i thismap. fl ' / '55 District 01 j ç ,jfi Pitt Meadows 23573 Kanaka Way J\ ;!str!I 1/1 OCORPORAONOF N ey __ Thomni MAPLE RIDGE (.J Th ! Incorporated 12, September, 1874 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:1,974 7-1 Ri9, DATE: Apr 1,2004 FILE: SDI1O8/02 BY: DS -_._ MNVDRV~ 25 11 - damax consultants ltd 3862w. 14th avenue, vancouver v6 191. 224-6827 fax.222-9240 '' J I1s I1s 11.345 II4$ IIJq 12.651 I 23 4ISsq.m$22 '20 19 18 16 P' o o a a -A. 2 3I2 LP tøP' 1ij Iuq n.si ILlis 11.345 12.651 / 02 a AD . to 26 37.153 IUs 12.150 12.150 12.153 - o 4991q.vn. 14 37.155 15 13' 12 14 10 I I'- 27 " ' w 147qaa. 33qm. 37J 22Iiçifl 31ft SI5sn I I iS SO) 1L255 ILuSo NE 12.550 Mew 10255 *1451 12.451 P2.53* 52. I 17.574 t- H 3 p 4 5 6 *2 i 17.150 ss 24074 ' 12.431 13.431 •l.eJ I , 340çm. o e, 33$4 I — O/'3YV CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 5, 2004 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: Administrative Agreement with the Province regarding Electrical and Gas Inspection Services EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The new Safety Standards Act, a consolidation of the previous Electrical, Elevating devices, Gas Power Engineers and Boiler and Pressure Vessel safety Acts, will require the District of Maple Ridge to enter into an Administrative Agreement with the Province in order to continue providing electrical and gas inspection services. The Administrative Agreement formalizes the process by which Local Authorities are delegated to perform electrical and gas inspections in the Province of B.C. RECOMMENDATION: THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to sign and seal the Administrative Agreement as set out in Appendix 'A' of the April 5, 2004 report entitled "Administrative Agreement with the Province regarding Electrical and Gas Inspection Services" for the continuation of providing electrical and gas inspection services within its jurisdiction. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: •For many years (decades) the District of Maple Ridge has provided electrical and gas inspections. Today, Inspection Services has two full-time Electrical Inspectors and two full-time Plumbing and Gas Inspectors on staff. This team of Inspectors provides full inspections for all electrical and gas works in Maple Ridge. The Inspectors are certified, under provincial authorization, to perform electrical and gas inspections and this will continue under the new Safety Standards Act. The Safety Standards Act will designate our Inspectors as "Safety Officers", certified to perform electrical and gas inspection within the District of Maple Ridge. The certification of Safety Officers will be maintained through the new Safety Authority. This Authority replaces the Provincial Safety Engineering Services Branch with respect to certifying and developing training programs for Safety Officers. The new Safety Standards Act and related Regulations resulted from the work of the Safety Systems Review, an extensive private/public review of the BC safety system. These reviews were conducted in 1995-97. The new Act and Regulations reflect considerable time and effort by a great many stake-holders from Industry, Business, Institutions, Local and Provincial Government focussing on improving the safety of British Columbians. The new Act and related provincial safety framework is based on the provincial position that many of the services traditionally delivered by the province can be more efficiently provided 1 by non-government bodies, under appropriate regulations and supervision. This model of safety governance has been implemented in Alberta and Ontario. Britain, Australia and New Zealand also employ the same safety system with varying degrees of success. Currently, there are eleven municipalities that provide electrical and or gas inspection services as part of an integrated building inspection program in B.C. The Province, through its Safety Engineering Division, has traditionally provided service coverage to the remainder of B.C. However, this has changed on April 1, 2004 when a newly established independent agency, the B.C. Safety Authority, is delegated authority to do so. The new Safety Standards Act also provides for delegating authority to municipalities to continue administering the Act within their jurisdiction. During the past year we have had several meetings (Local Government Forums) with the Province regarding the new Safety Act and Administrative Agreement. The proposed agreement has received endorsement by the eleven municipal representatives. The City of Vancouver has authorized the city to enter into the Administrative Agreement. The Administration Agreement is attached as Appendix A. Desired Outcome: The signing of the Administrative Agreement has no bearing upon the day-to-day delivery of hispection Services in Maple Ridge. The Administrative Agreement provides a formal means for the Local Government and Province to recognize Local Government Electrical and Gas Inspection Services administration. Citizen/Customer Implications/Public Information: None required with respect to the Administrative Agreement. However, the Provincial government will deal with trades certifications. Levels of competency and training are changing from past practice. Municipal inspections of those works will ensure that electrical and gas installations will be performed at the appropriate safety level, as evidenced during the inspection process. Business Plan/Financial Implications: There are no financial costs in respect to entering into this agreement. Inspection operations for electrical and.gas installations would continue under the current mandate to operate on a cost recovery basis. There are no personnel implications in respect to entering into this agreement. Alternative: Council may choose not to sign the Administrative Agreement. In not signing the Administrative Agreement the municipality would be opting out of Electrical and Gas Inspections. The benefit for Electrical and Gas Inspection to the citizen/consumer would be significantly reduced, as Safety Authority will only provide limited inspections, based on a "risk-management" inspection approach. CONCLUSIONS: In order to continue providing electrical and gas inspection services as part of an integrated building inspection program, it is recommended that the District of Maple Ridge enter into an Administrative Agreement with the Province as set out in Appendix A. Prepared by: Pieter M. Den Uyl, R.B.O., Manager of Inspection Services -i Reviewed by: Brock McDonald Directq,r of Busine s-Lcenses, Permits and Bylaws aa__,_ - Approved by: tank Quinn, P.Eng., ,4 eneral manager: Public Works and Development Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jtdministrative ) Rule Chief Officer /pdu tj Schedule A DATED this day of , 2004. ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, represented by the Minister of Community, Aboriginal and Women's Services (the "Province") AND: THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Having an office at 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC, V2X 6A9 ("Maple Ridge") (Collectively the "Parties") WH.E.REA.S A. Pursuant to section 5(3) of the Act, the Lieutenant Governor in Council may, by regulation, delegate the authority to administer all or part of the Act to a local government, subject to an administrative agreement being entered with that local government, and, upon execution of this Agreement by the Parties, the Minister of Community, Aboriginal and Women's Services intends to recommend to the Lieutenant Governor in Council the enactment of a delegation regulation. C\Docaments and Settings\PieterD\Dektop\LG Agreement 07ApriI04-Map1eRidge#2.doc -2- The Province wishes to maintain and enhance public safety, promote consistency in the application of the Act, and be responsive to client needs. Maple Ridge wishes to continue to provide electrical and gas safety services within its community as contemplated in this Agreement and the regulation. NOW THEREFORE the Parties agree as follows: Article I Definitions 1.01 In this Agreement and in the recitals to it, unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions will apply: "Act" means the Safety Standards Act; "Administrative Authorities" means local governments which administer some or all of the provisions of the Act pursuant to a regulation enacted under section 5(3) of the Act; "Agreement" means this agreement and includes the recitals to this agreement; and "BCSA" means the British Columbia Safety Authority incorporated under the Safety Authority Act. Article 2 Purposes of Agreement 2.61 The purposes of this Agreement are: - to formalize the current practice whereby Maple Ridge administers certain requirements for electrical and gas safety; and to provide for a consistent approach to safety by establishing the overall objectives of the safety assurance system. -3- Article 3 Objectives 3.01 The Parties agree to the following objectives with respect to electrical and gas safety in British Columbia: to promote activities which will enhance public safety; to promote safety services that meet the needs of clients and the public; and to promote open lines of communication between Administrative Authorities, the BCSA and the Province on safety matters, including the sharing of information. 3.02 The basis for a consultative partnership in the delivery of safety services will be estblished in a Memorandum of Understanding agreed to between the BCSA and the Administrative Authorities. Article 4 Incident Reporting 4.01 The Safety Standards General Regulation under the Act establishes the process for incident reporting to the appropriate safety manager. 4.02 Subject to the Safety Standards General Regulation, any additional requirements for the reporting of incidents will be established between the Administrative Authorities and the BCSA in a Memorandum of Understanding which will identify the method of, and the timing for, reporting the details of the incident. ArtcIe 5 Amendments to the Agreement 5.01 This Agreement may be amended only by further written agreement between the Parties. 5.02 The Parties agree to a formal review of the Agreement every 5 years. 4 5.03 In accordance with section 5(4) of the Act, the Province will consult with Maple Ridge where proposed changes to the Act or its regulations have substantive implications for this Agreement. 5.04 If Maple Ridge intends to terminate all or part of its administration of the Act as contemplated in section 5(6) of the Act, the Parties will establish a time frame for the change that is acceptable to both Parties. Article 6 Miscellaneous 6.01 The headings or captions in this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and do not form a part of this Agreement and in no way define, limit, alter or enlarge the scope or meaning of any provision of this Agreement. 6.02 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties and no understandings, representations or agreements, oral or otherwise, exist between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement except as expressly set out in or incorporated by reference in this Agreement. 6.03 In this Agreement, words in the singular include the plural, and words in the plural include the singular, unless the context otherwise requires. 6.04 In this Agreement, a reference to a statute includes every amendment to it, every regulation made under it, and any law enacted in substitution for it, or in replacement of it. -5- IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been duly executed on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia, represented by the Minister of Community, Aboriginal and Women's Services and by Maple Ridge by its duly authorized representatives or officers as of the date first above written. SIGNED on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia by a duly authorized representative of the Minister of Community, Aboriginal and Women's Services in the presence of: For the Minister of Community, Aboriginal and Women's Services (Witness) SIGNED on behalf of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge by its duly authorized representatives or officers as of the date first written above: Authorized Representative of the District of Maple Ridge (Witness) CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 14, 2004 and Members of Council FILE NO: E02-010-059. 1 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Replacement of the 232 Street Bridge over the South Alouette River EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 232 Street is a major arterial road corridor within the District, providing access to Silver Valley and Golden Ears Park. The District's regular bridge inspection program identified the existing timber bridge on 232 Street over the South Alouette River for replacement and the District has been preparing for the replacement of the bridge in 2004. Assuming that construction can commence in May, the bridge replacement will take approximately six months to construct and will require in-stream works in the South Alouette River. District staff are working with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to secure their approval for the in-stream works and minimization of disturbance to the river system. The project is to construct a two-lane bridge with sidewalks, bicycle lanes and a substructure that can support 4 lanes. Prior to the commencement of the detailed design, a number of different design configurations were considered for the proposed bridge. The ultimate bridge will be four lanes, complete with bicycle lanes and sidewalks. However, the proposed two-lane structure is adequate for the expected traffic volumes over the next 10-15 years. The construction of the foundations and substructure for the ultimate configuration will negate the need to conduct work in the river in the future. The tender for the construction of the bridge replacement was issued in February 2004 and closed March 05, 2004. Tenders were received from five contractors. Additional funds have been identified to augment the current funding to match the estimated total project costs based on the lowest tender. Construction of the bridge will result in significant traffic disturbance and will require extensive traffic diversions and public information process. The contractor selected to undertake the construction will be required to provide a comprehensive traffic management plan to the District's satisfaction. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Construction Contract E02-010-059.1 be awarded to the lowest qualified bidder, Seismic 2000 Construction Ltd. for the total tendered sum of $4,515,948 (excluding GST and contingencies) and that the Mayor and the Municipal Clerk be authorized to sign and execute the contract; and further THAT the 2004-2008 Financial Plan and future financial plans be revised as noted in the staff report titled "Replacement of the 232 Street Bridge over the South Alouette River" dated April 14, 2004. 107 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The existing bridge on 232 Street over the South Alouette River is a timber structure that has been identified as a priority for replacement as a result of the District's regularly scheduled bridge inspection program. The current allowable load rating is 24 tonnes and the bridge is posted as such. The present load rating is restrictive to large construction vehicles as well as fire trucks and transit buses seeking to access the Silver Valley area. Prior to the commencement of the detailed design, a number of different design configurations were considered for the proposed bridge. The ultimate bridge will be four lanes, complete with bicycle lanes and sidewalks. However, a two-lane structure is adequate for the expected traffic volumes over the next 10-15 years. The scope of the current project is to construct a structure in 2004 that allows for the future expansion to four lanes. This project will include the construction of the foundations and substructure for the ultimate configuration that will negate the need to conduct work in the river itself in the future. This design concept of the bridge and associated roadworks minimizes the required closure of 232 Street - it does still require closure of the bridge but only for approximately six weeks to permit the demolition of the existing structure and placing of the bridge decking. There will be intermittent total closures while constructing the southbound lane and structure but these are expected to be short in duration. A public information process will be implemented. Utility Relocations The existing bridge has a sanitary forcemain located along the east side of the structure. This sanitary main will be replaced as part of this project. There is also an existing water main located under the riverbed to the east side of the bridge that should be replaced. The preliminary estimates allowed for only partial relocation of the existing water main crossing the river, and re-use of the existing sanitary force main. Through the design process, it was determined that both the water and sanitary mains should be replaced. The water main is laid at a minimal cover across the river and the hydrotechnical investigation has indicated that it is vulnerable in extreme flood conditions, as it is located in a scour zone. Both the sanitary and water mains will be relocated to the underside of the proposed bridge. The relocation of the water and sanitary mains is included in the project tender for a submitted cost of $369,650. The proposed bridge will also provide service ducts along the bridge to accommodate future utility needs for hydro, gas or communications. Schedule As previously noted, the project tender closed on March 05, 2004. The contemplated construction schedule for 2004 schedule is as follows: Complete tender review April 02, 2004 Council Award of Contract April 27, 2004 Commence Construction May 05, 2004 Completion of in-stream works Sept. 15, 2004 Substantial Completion of construction Dec. 31, 2004 - Environmental The environmental consultant working on this project has been working with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) on when access to and around the river will be permitted. DFO has indicated that construction work within the riparian area for the north abutment can commence on May 15, 2004 and construction work for the south abutment can start on June 15, 2004. Piling for the centre pier is pennitted from July 15, 2004 and DFO has also indicated approval for in-stream works from August 1 to September 15 (extending perhaps to September 30 if the weather permits). This in-stream works window will allow construction of the piling and substructure as well as removal of the existing bridge. The completion of the in-stream works is pivotal to the successful completion of the construction as the bridge decking and superstructure works can proceed outside of the approved fisheries windows. Desired Outcome: The intent of this project is to replace the existing timber structure with a composite steel & concrete structure capable of carrying full highway loading, built to current seismic standards. The new bridge will be an enhanced structure, facilitating multi-modal transportation. The proposed structure will also be able to facilitate the development of the north-east sector of Maple Ridge. Strategic Alignment: The Corporate Strategic Plan directs that the District will "maintain and enhance a multi- modal transportation system" and "promote alternative modes of travel". The 232 Street bridge replacement project in question provides a facility that enhances safety and connectivity for motorists, cyclists and pedestrians using the bridge to access both provincial and district parks as well as for residents in the north-east sector. Citizen/Customer Implications: project communication plan The construction of the proposed bridge will impact the Silver Valley residents and users of Golden Ears Park in the construction period but will ultimately provide a safe and reliable means of transportation to the area. A project communication plan is being prepared which incorporates the following: Project Signage at key locations. Project / Construction Information Updates through the following: • Mail Distribution (electronic and post) to • Residents in the area (monthly letters to area residents and businesses) • UBC Research Forest Golden Ears Park • BC Hydro Dam • Emergency Services • TransLink • Ministry of Transportation • Major transportation companies (including Coast Mountain Bus Company, School buses, taxis, etc.) • Advertisements in local newspapers with regular updates • Radio Broadcasts through local radio stations on the status and plans for the partial and full closures • Regular updates on District's web site Traffic Detour Plans will combine the District's and constructors signage plans. Advanced information on detour plans will be provided to the public. Public information sessions that include the following: • Verbal updates to Council • Project Open House (The Open House will be scheduled shortly after the award and is planned for Yennadon Elementary School). As another aspect of this project, the District has been and will continue to work with local groups including equestrian users, property owners adjacent to the bridge site and the Alouette River Management Society (ARMS). Interdepartmental Implications: The Engineering Department has been working with the Operations Department, the Planning Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Finance Department and Clerks and will continue to work with various departments during construction of the bridge project. These co-activities include the following: > The Operations department will assist in the controlling of utility services where required - shutting off mains, providing alternate supplies, diverting flows through the systems where necessary. > Environmental compensation is required as a consequence for working within the river and the Engineering and Planning departments will work with the relevant approving authorities to provide cost effective solutions. Construction in and around the river will be undertaken in accordance with the District's Watercourse Protection Bylaw and will require the Contractor to submit an extensive Sediment Control Plan prior to construction. > Maple Ridge Park and campgrounds are located just north of the project and the Parks department has been and will continue to be informed of project implications. Park access is expected to be maintained during the construction. > The Engineering Department will also work with the provincial authorities responsible for Golden Ears Park to ensure they are kept fully informed of the project's progress. > The Engineering department has been working with Parks department to facilitate tree planting at Maple Ridge Park and as well as at Crosses Cabin as part of the environmental compensation plan. Business Plan/Financial Implications: The tenders submitted for the project ranged from the low bid from Seismic 2000 Construction Ltd. of $5,170,760.46 to a high of $6,447,531.41. The bids all include 7% GST and a 7.5% contingency. With the exclusion of GST and a contingency of $338,696 the estimated total project costs may be summarized thus: Construction Contract (net of GST) $4,515,948 • GST (3%) $ 153,439 Contingencies $ 338,696 Environmental Compensation $ 150,000 -- Contract Administration $ 110,000 Utilities relocations and Property Issues S 504000 Total $5,318,083 Financial Implications The bridge replacement is included in the 2004 Financial Plan approved by Council. The 232 Street bridge is a designated TransLink Major Regional Network road. TransLink's portion of the funding is approximately $1.7 million. After review and analysis with the Finance Department, the following funding structure is recommended: * DCC's TransLink Internal Financing Storm Drainage LTC#542 Sewer Utility Accumulated Surplus Water Utility Accumulated Surplus Total Current available Budget funding amendment Total $1,347,000 $190,000 $1.537,000 $1,623,850 $ 71,460 $1,695,310 $1,400,000 $300,000 $1,700,000 $ 14,750 $ 14,750 $ 88,023 $ 88,023 $283,000 $ 283.000 $4,370,850 $947,233 $5,318,083 The additional cost of relocating the water main and replacing the sanitary main is proposed to be funded from the Water and Sewer Utilities respectively. The contingency of $338,696 will only be used only if required. Internal financing will be provided from the General Revenue Fund balance (Accumulated Surplus). The repayment of the internal financing will be amortized over 10 years from current operating funds. The repayment may be completed sooner if other funds become available such as a surplus in the MFA Sinking Fund or extra interest earned on the MFA debt reserve requirement. Policy Implications: The proposed bridge replacement over the South Alouette River is in accordance with District policies to provide high quality infrastructure in a cost-effective manner. Alternatives: There are three primary alternatives available to the District. These are as follows: The District may choose not to replace the bridge at this time. Under this alternative, it will be necessary to expend approximately $150,000 to rehabilitate failing components, and that only extends the life by a relatively short duration. It may be possible that ongoing repairs may prolong the structure's life, but that only postpones the inevitable. Also, the current structure, even with ongoing rehabilitation will require restrictions on permitted vehicle loading. This alternative forfeits the external funding that has been approved for this project. 2. The District may choose to re-tender the project in 2005. This would allow the accumulation of additional funding. However, the volatility of construction and inflation pressures are risk factors which may result in higher prices in 2005 and the risk that the accumulation of funds may be insufficient. In addition, it may be necessary to expend funds in 2004 to rehabilitate failing components, that would only extend the life by a relatively short duration. However, further analysis will be required. This alternative has an impact on the funding as described in alternative 3. 3. The District could terminate the tender process with all tenderers, modify the project scope and design and re-tender the project with the modifications to reduce the project costs. However, the impact and risks of this alternative include the delays and potential loss of a large portion of 2004 construction window and resulting delay of completion. In addition, there is uncertainty of construction pricing in the market and the modifications may be offset by increases in unit construction costs. In addition, the allowable fisheries construction window will be reduced and will result in delays in the schedule and extend the length of time to complete the project. As with the other alternatives, a significant portion of the financing of the project is dependent on external funding (i.e. grants) which expire incrementally over the next 2 years. An extension of almost one million dollars will have to be requested if funding approved expenditures extend beyond the 2004 fiscal year. CONCLUSIONS: The existing bridge on 232 Street over the South Alouette River is to all intents and purposes at the end of its design life cycle. This project is to replace the existing structure with a facility that encourages multi-modal modes of transportation, supports current and expected usage over the next 10-15 years and allows for expansion to the ultimate four lanes without having to undertake any further work in the river itself. ..' N. I ~ _0 - M~u l m Prepared by: David Pollock, PEng. \. Director4f Project Engineering Reviewed by: idrew Wood, MEng., PEng. Municipal Engineer / - Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng., PMP General Manager, PW & DS Q Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule 'hief Administrative Officer / Weviewed CGA -I Director of Finance dp/kg CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 5, 2004 and Membersof Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: SUBJECT: Municipal Equipment Purchase, Street Sweeper EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Equipment Replacement Program schedules the replacement of one Regenerative Air Street Sweeper for 2004. Award of Contract #2004-20 is recommended following analysis and evaluation of the four tenders received. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the tender #2004-20 for the replacement of one Regenerative Air Street Sweeper be awarded to Crocker Equipment Co. Ltd in the amount of $190,563.50 Background: The District of Maple Ridge has a comprehensive Equipment Replacement Program. Through that program, the life-cycle replacement costs for each major piece of equipment are identified. The program identifies the optimum year for a major piece of equipment to be replaced. Public Tenders were opened on March 26, 2004 for the supply of one Regenerative Air Sweeper. Four tenders were received. After review and analysis of all the tenders, the bid submitted by Crocker Equipment Co. Ltd. Provides the best value for the District. Citizen/Customer Implications Street Sweeper: The Street Sweepers is utilized for year-round construction and maintenance activities in Operations and is key to the upkeep and maintenance of the District's infrastructure. Public Information: The tenders were publicly advertised in the local newspapers, and opened in public. The unsuccessful bidders will be informed by letter. Business Plan/Financial Implications: Purchase of this fleet vehicle is part of the 2004 Equipment Replacement Program, budgeted and funded from the Equipment Replacement Reserve. Alternatives: Extending the use of the existing unit was reviewed. Mechanically, the unit is at the age where it needs to be replaced. Conclusions: The replacement of a Regenerative Air Street Sweeper is scheduled and budgeted for 2004. It is recommended that Contract 4200420 be awarded. PreparCarmichael, AScT. F4. Director of Engineering Operations Approval: rank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng., PMP General Manager: Public Works & Development Services Reviewed: Pk CGA General Manager of Corporate and Financial Services Concurrence: /J.L. (Jim) Rule -. ChiefAdm.ini/trati.veOfficer FQ:bkg CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 2, 2004 and Members of Council FILE NO: 0320-01 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: CofW SUBJECT: Tag Day Soliciting EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: To grant permission for Tag Day soliciting at the entrances to local businesses, as requested in the letter dated April 2, 2004 from the Royal Canadian Air Cadets, 583 Coronation Squadron. It should be noted that approval by Municipal Council does not preclude the necessity for the applicant to receive permission from the administration offices at the respective business locations for the use of their premises. RECOMMENDATION: That the request, dated April 2, 2004, of the 583 Coronation Squadron of the Royal Canadian Air Cadets for permission to conduct Tag Day soliciting at business entrances throughout the District of Maple Ridge on Friday, May 14, 2004 and Saturday, May 15, 2004 be approved. DISCUSSION: Background Context: Pursuant to Section 25 of the Highway and Traffic By-law and Section 532(1) of the Local Government Act, soliciting for donation (door-to-door canvassing, tag days, etc.) must be approved by the Municipal Council by way of a resolution. Citizen/Customer Implications: Tag days are the means by which non-profit organizations such as the Air Cadets raise funds for special programs and extracurricular activities that would otherwise not be possible. CONCLUSIONS: In order to meet the requirements of Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By-law No. 3 136-1982 and the Local Government Act, Council's approval is required for all requests for soliciting for donation. Prepared by: Diana Dalton C rk's Department Approved by: lQ1 iiI, B.B.A, C.G.A, F.R.M 1'1enerjVIanager: Corporate & Financial Services Concurrence: /Chief L. (Jim) Rule Administrative Officer Attachment q3/ 03:20-01 583 CORONATION SQUADRON, RCAC 12101-224th STREET MAPLE RIDGE, BC, V2X 6B7 604-463-9388 RECEIVED AT RECEPTION DESK APR 02 2004 2 d April, 2004 Dear Madam Mayor and Council Air Cadet Tag Days The 583 Coronation Royal Canadian Air Cadet Squadron are planning a Tag Day drive in order to raise funds for cadet activities and for the operation of the squadron on the following dates and times: Friday 14th May from 5:00PM to 9:00PM and, Saturday 15th May from 9:00AM to 5:00PM. We are seeking permission to allow the Cadets to stand outside local business in order to canvas patrons for funds to help meet our operating costs. Please note that when the Air Cadets are on premises, they will be in Canadian military cadet uniform and covered by Air Cadet League of Canada liability insurance. Cadets will be instructed to conduct themselves in a mature, polite and courteous manner. As established in prior Tag Day drives, an older, experienced cadet will be paired with a younger new cadet. All cadets will also be instructed not to obstruct the flow of traffic in and out of the facility. The Tag Day drives are a major means of fundraising for our organization and your permission to allow us to use local businesses is vital. The 583 Squadron appreciates your involvement in the community and looks forward to a positive response. Please call me with your confirmation at your earliest convenience. Yours truly, Tina Kirkpatrick 583 Squadron Chairperson tinakirk@ca.ibm.com 604-466-0569 (H) 604-297-3078 (B) 7dvcg•/ CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 6, 2004 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: Police Services Masterplan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: During the 2004/2008 Business Plan deliberations, Council directed the RCMP to prepare a long-term plan for our police services. A methodology similar to that used in developing the Fire Department Masterplan is proposed, the outline of which is attached. RESOLUTION: THAT Council approve the development of a Police Masterplan, using the methodology attached to the April 6, 2004 report from the GM: Corporate & Financial Services. DISCUSSION: Over the past several years, we have discussed the need for longer term planning in all of our service areas. Recently, such plans have been developed for our Parks & Leisure Services and for our Fire Department. The police are one of our largest portions of our budget and a masterplan would allow us to start planning now for what we will need in the future. Pre ared by: Paul Gill GM: Corporate & Financial Services Approved by: raser MacRae, OIC RidgeadowsRCMP Concurrenf J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer -1- 3 - RCMP Masterplan Proposed Methodology 1. Establish group to work on Masterplan. Group to include: Representatives from both Municipal Councils Police Chief CAO's and/or Principal Policing Contacts RCMP members & municipal employees from detachment Police volunteers, including auxiliaries. 2. Two communities are unique so at the outset each community will spend time considering the following: Understanding context. - Areas of particular interest may be: > Future development patterns in each community > Social/demographic profile of each community > Financial capacity of each community > Crime trends Understanding Current Services. What are the current services that we provide and to what level do we provide them? > What are the factors that will impact these services in the future? > What are our priorities and how should they be established? > How do we know we are making a difference? When the community changes, what will we need to be doing? 3. Information from the 2 communities will be shared and together, we will discuss the gaps that exist between iii) and ii) above. How can we start to bridge the gap? What are the alternatives? How do we keep the plan updated and minimize gaps in the future? 4. Group will then recommend course of action. 5. How will we know that we're on the right track? Need to establish performance measures. -2- CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: 2004 04 06 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: Municipal Position re: Blue Mountain Forest EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this report is to obtain Council direction on an appropriate position for the Municipality to take related to the use of lands within the Blue Mountain Provincial Forest. This is particularly important in light of competing requests for the expansion of both the BCIT woodlot and Kanaka Creek Regional Park. Final decisions on this use rest with the Provincial Government, however, it is felt to be appropriate to convey the District's views on this subject prior to the decision being reached. The Parks and Leisure Services Commission have reviewed and concur with the following recommendation. RECOMMENDATION(S): That a letter be forwarded to the Minister of Forests and the Minister of Sustainable Resource Management supporting the addition of the area identified in the map attached to the 2004 04 06 report on this subject as an addition to Kanaka Creek Regional Park and the addition of lands on the eastern slopes of Alouette Lake in Blue Mountain Provincial Forest to Golden Ears Provincial Park; and the remainder of the Blue Mountain Provincial Forest being managed sustainably for timber harvest and recreation, with better identification and protection of environmentally sensitive features, particularly those related to the hydrology of Kanaka Creek and the regional parks/greenways program, and appropriate recreation management. DISCUSSION: a.) Background Context: In 1999 BCIT applied for an expansion to Woodlot 40007 within the Blue Mountain Provincial - Forest.area. The proposed.. expansion includedanareatothewest of the existingBClT Woodlot in the direction of Kanaka Creek. The expansion has not been given final consideration although we are advised the only step left to take is consultation with the Katzie first nation. In February of 2002 Maple Ridge Council adopted the following resolution in relation to this subject: That the following list of issues be forwarded to Atticus Resource Consulting Ltd. for consideration in the Blue Mountain Provincial Forest Resource Strategy: The postponement of any decision by the Ministry of Forests to expand the BCIT Woodlot into Crown land until the completion of the Blue Mountain Forest Resource Strategy; The consideration of viewscape preservation, especially from Golden Ears Provincial Park; The consideration of possible neighborhood conflicts, i.e. parking congestion on local roads generated by recreation users; 'i51 Possible liability ifProvincial Forest access is provided through District owned property, The need to determine the number of residential surface water licenses and consider any possible impacts of timber harvest and recreation use in the area; 6 The need for a wildl?fe use assessment and protection of wildlife corridors; The need to map and class ify the watercourses in the area and delineate watershed boundaries, The need to complete an environmental impact assessment that takes into consideration the wide range of uses being undertaken in the areas; Consideration ofpossible mechanisms for dealing with illegal dumping and vandalism in the area; The identfi cation of any mining claims in the area; and Assurance that the Woodlot No. 38 and the BCIT Woodlot will modify their management plans to reflect the outcomes of the Blue Mountain Resource Strategy. The final Blue Mountain Provincial Forest Recreation Management Strategy report was submitted to the Ministry of Forests by Enfor Consultants in March of 2003 (copy attached). Implementation of the various recommendations was identified previously as a significant challenge given the lack of resources allocated to this purpose. Having said this one of the consultant recommendations has been acted upon through the formation of an Ad Hoc Users Group. The group has been meeting over the past year and is challenged with developing an implementation model in concert with the Ministry. No further information has been forwarded to Council as a result of these meetings. The proposal to expand the boundary of the BCIT woodlot is being considered again given completion of the Blue Mountain Forest Management Strategy. At the same time GVRD Parks has completed its Management Plan for Kanaka Creek Regional Park and has requested that the park boundary be extended to the north (see attached map) into a portion of the proposed woodlot #00007 expansion. The attached GVRD Parks report speaks to this subject as does the letter forwarded to the District Manager, Mr. Kerry Grozier, requesting that the woodlot expansion not be considered pending a review by the Minister of Sustainable Resources of GVRD's request for the Park expansion. This report is forwarded to request Council's direction concerning the Municipal position on GVRD Park's request, which can then be advanced to both the Minister of Sustainable Development and the Minister of Forests. The remainder of the recommendation parallels the GVRD Parks position on the rest of the of the Blue Mountain Forest outside of the area requested by GVRD for park purposes. Desired Qutcome: The desired outcome of this discussion is a clear municipal position on the use of the Blue Mountain Provincial Forest Lands. Ultimately the decisions taken by the Provincial Government will have an impact on the livability of the community and on the sustainability of the resource and adjacent important resources such as Kanaka Creek Regional Park and Golden ears Provincial park. Strategic Alignment: The recommendations noted above address tourism values (related to protection of the eastern shore of Alouette Lake), environmental values (related to the expansion of Kanaka Creek Park), sustainable recreation values (related to the appropriate management of recreational uses in the Forest) and economic sustainability (related to mixed use of the lands outside of the area recommended for regional and provincial park expansion, including timber harvesting). They also reflect the 1996 Parks and Outdoor Recreation Strategy recommendations previously adopted by Council. d)Citizen/Customer Implications: The recommendations noted above respect many of the views expressed by local residents and groups concerning use of the Forest with the exception of the Blue Mountain Kanaka Creek Conservation Group and others associated with that group who have requested that the entirety of the Blue Mountain Forest be held as a protected area. e) Public Information Requirements The Blue Mountain and Kanaka Creek Conservation Group will be advised of the report going before the Commission and Council and will receive a copy in advance of the Commission meeting. The recreation groups wishing access to Blue Mountain may perceive Council's endorsement of use of the remainder of Blue Mountain for mixed recreation activities (including motorized recreation activities) as an indication that the District is endorsing those uses. In discussing this subject it will be important to emphasize that the District's endorsement of mixed use is subject to adequate trail maintenance and recreation management practices being put in place which will preserve the environmental integrity of the Forest. These are not currently in place. Nor is an acceptable access point for motorized recreation use Blue Mountain currently available. e) Interdepartmental/Intergovernmental Implications: The proposed position aligns well with the GVRD Parks report. As noted above the District's authority with respect to land use does not extend to the Provincial Forest. Final decisions on all of the District recommendations will rest with the Provincial Government. 0 Financial Implications: The direct financial implications of the subject covered in this report are minimal to non existent for the Municipality. However, the financial impact of misuse of an important natural resource could be significant with respect to lost tourism and the environmental degradation which may result from-unmanaged-motorized-reereat-ion-useof-the-for-est. CONCLUSION The most appropriate conclusion is likely derived from the GVRD Parks report on this subject and follows: The recommendation ". . .offers continuing support for completing the Provincial Parks system in the lower mainland and allows forestry activities using sustainable practices to occur over a large area of Blue Mountain. The land use conflicts in Blue Mountain Provincial Forest are likely to grow as the surrounding urban communities expand and recreation use continues to increase, particularly mountain biking. The challenge of managing such urban/working forest interfaces will likely require cooperative efforts from industry, recreationists, First Nations and provincial, regional and municipal governments and institutions." Pepared b -Mike Murray7 General M ager:7ommunity Development, Parks and Recreation Approved by: Frank Qui , 1Ig., PMP General Managr: Public Works and Development Services Concurrence: J. L. IJim)'Rule Chiet Administrative Officer MWM Attachment 2 / •' 4.1/' 1 /,-' / ') / // VP 1BI(e Foret \ oi l l I fic ; 7 A~' i". ': PtoposedPrel.miri / ,j.•: GVRDCrown.Avep/ • Interest . •f., \4toi 'fr. It rLT DewyTruRRo'adf' 'i 7.7 \ jt:; .c1r( •f4: t'• , I -•--- Legend: --' MunpaVProv'ncot Road • - MuipI Boundary Uttity Corrdor Poili Bound'ry and Area \ Fropood Pck W,rking Boundary '.. Clvrck Irbutary Contour Lne a.rs Restion Node Regiona' Parks Other Trans J Regional Purica a a a Grcenway —• Ditv ct of Mpte RkIe' BCITPS Pon1laf I I Woodlot Proposed BCITFS Top up \\\ Proposed GVRO Packs crca of interest 3Ø( Ovailap of r.terests - Pijcs and BCITFS BrIdgi 'j Materfas c? Ping (26 Woshroomo - (EP Picntckng v Viowpont A o 200 400 600 800 Kanaka Creek RegIonal Park Forest Core • Crown Land Extension Scsle:Msflown Date01/04 Ooiol. 2002 a- 1 1 L. i -L •J?. 4. •) -' nnok Lakei Attachment 2 • IA .. 10 - Rr cr.:f P 'r 1 .1 poLt: PTG - P.r , R Wa- :. .. - L -. BCTS 1O1 R;'.orJ P_r BCiTFE/Pr Ovr:".p Vprox 25 Hi 11 / - Attachment 3 Regional Parb Greater Vancouver Regional District Telephone (604) 432-6350 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5H 4G8 Fax (604) 432-6296 Parks Committee Meeting Date: February 13, 2004 TO: FROM: DATE SUBJECT: Parks Committee Wendy DaDalt, East Area Manager Paul Skydt, Planning and Stewardship Division Manager March 4, 2004 Blue Mountain Provincial Forest, Maple Ridge Recommendations: That the Parks Committee: Support the addition of lands on the eastern slopes of Alouette Lake in Blue Mountain Provincial Forest to Golden Ears Provincial Park; and Accept the remainder of Blue Mountain Provincial Forest, except for the Crown land sought for expansion of Kanaka Creek Regional Park, being managed sustainably for timber harvest and recreation, with better identification and protection of environmentally sensitive features, particularly those related to the hydrology of Kanaka Creek and the regional parks/greenways program, and appropriate recreation management. PURPOSE To adopt a position with regard to a delegation request for GVRD to support protection of Blue Mountain Provincial Forest and its addition to Golden Ears Provincial Park. CONTEXT In October 2003 the Blue Mountain Kanaka Creek Conservation Group appeared as a delegation before the Parks Cominittee to seek its support for protection of the 7,500 ha Blue Mountain Provincial Forest through its addition to Golden Ears Provincial Park (see Attachment No. 1). The Parks Committee endorsed the policy framework for the Kanaka Creek Management Plan in November 2003 which included expansion of the northern boundary by seeking an addition of Provincial Crown land. Attachment No. 2 illustrates GVRD's current working boundary for this area which is actively being pursued with the Province because of a pending application by BCIT Forest Society for lands of common interest with GVRD. During the Province's Protected Areas Strategy (PAS) process in 1996 the northwestern slopes of Blue Mountain were flagged as important to protect the view and watershed of Alouette Lake in Golden Ears, one of the busiest provincial parks. With the creation of Pinecone-Burke Provincial Park and expansion of other parks in the Lower Mainland, the eastern slopes addition was dropped because it exceeded the 12-14% parkiand allocation target for the Lower Mainland. Subsequent lobbying for protection of all or parts of the Crown land have been rejected by the Ministry of Forests. However, the merits of this proposed park addition have only grown in importance with continued growth in population, park use, and importance of tourism in the Lower Mainland and its status should be revisited. As part of its campaign to protect Blue Mountain, the Conservation Group obtained support in 2002 from a number of conservation groups and several municipalities including New Westminster and Delta for the addition of the Provincial Forest to Golden Ears. Recent discussions with the District of Maple Ridge indicate that the municipality is reviewing a number of concerns voiced by the Conservation Group. Additionally, recreationists and neighbors have expressed concerns regarding management and recreation activities in the Provincial Forest. Council has not taken a position on the Conservation Group's protection proposal. The District in December 2003 requested the Ministry of Forests not allocate to BCITFS the Crown lands of interest to GVRD. Preservation of the jobs and economy associated with the forestry sector is an important consideration along with the application of best practices to better protect the headwaters of the Alouette and Kanaka watersheds. Past logging practices have affected tributaries in Kanaka's headwaters with logging roads sometimes diverting flow from natural water courses. BluMcuntait is heavily used for motorized recreation andmountain biking which have significantly impacted the natural environment. The Ministry of Forests undertook a planning process with stakeholders that resulted in a Forest Recreation Management Strategy in 2003. The shortage of resources to implement the recommendations in the Strategy means that.these issues w-ill likely worsen. Maple Ridge submitted an unsuccessful proposal to the Province in 1999 to operate the Provincial FOrest as a "Community Forest". An ad hoc group of forest stakeholders, - including Katzie First Nation, is continuing to explore the concept of a locally managed working forest. ALTERNATIVES The Parks Conmiittee could: Option 1: Support the addition of lands on the eastern slopes of Alouette Lake in Blue Mountain Provincial Forest to Golden Ears Provincial Park; and except for the Crown land addition to Kanaka Creek Regional Park, accept the remainder being managed sustainably for timber harvest and recreation, with better identification and protection of environmentally sensitive features, particularly those related to the hydrology of Kanaka Creek and the regional parks/greenways program, and appropriate recreation management. Option 2: Defer recommendation on the Provincial Forest outside of the Kanaka addition until a new Regional Parks and Greenway Plan is completed in 2005/06 which will identify proposed sites for conservation, recreation and greenways. Option 3: Support the Conservation Group's request to add Blue Mountain Provincial Forest to Golden Ears Provincial Park, excluding GVRD's land interest to extend the Forest Core. Only the eastern slopes portion of the Forest was originally considered significant enough to be a parkiand candidate in the PAS. Supporting further protection would require GVRD to consider the impact this would have on the designation of more critical sites in the Lower Mainland and Fraser Valley. CONCLUSION Option 1 offers continuing support for completing the provincial parks system in the Lower Mainland, and allows forestry activities using sustainable practices to occur over a large area of Blue Mountain. The land use conflicts in Blue Mountain Provincial Forest are likely to grow as the surrounding urban communities expand and recreation use continues to increase, particularly mountain biking. The challenge of managing such urban/working forest interfaces will likely require cooperative efforts from industry, recreationists, First Nations and provincial, regional and municipal governments and institutions. Attachment (2) /Greater Vancouver Regional District 4330 Kingsway, Bumaby, British Columbia, Canada V5H 4G8 Parks Department Telephone 604-432-6350 Fax 604-432-6296 March 3, 2004 File: PA-03-01-KAN Mr. Kerry Grozier, District Manager Ministry of Forests 46360 Airport Road Chilliwack, BC V2P 1A5 Re: Blue Mountain Provincial Forest and BCITFS Top-up Application Dear Mr. Grozier: Upon the recommendation of the Minister of Sustainable Resources (Attachment No.1) we are writing to request that a portion of the top-up area applied for by the British Columbia Institute of Technology Forest Society (BCITFS) for Woodlot 0007 (Attachment No. 2) not be granted at this time. The area has high environmental, scenic and recreational values that GVRD wishes to see protected, preferably by adding these lands to Kanaka Creek Regional Park. The GVRD Park Committee and Board will consider the final park plan in April 2004, with implementation phased over twenty years. Perhaps the province has a classification similar to the former UREP Reserves that could be placed over this area as an interim measure? On February 13, 2004 the GVRD Parks Committee adopted two recommendations regarding Blue Mountain Provincial Forest in response to an earlier delegation from the Blue MountainlKanaka Creek Conservation Group. They address our priorities to protect additional lands and recreational opportunities immediately above Kanaka Creek, promote sound stewardship-of adjacent-forest lands to-prevent - impactstothe regional - park andKanaka€reek; and support the enhancement of the Lower Mainland provincial parks system. The full staff report is Attachment No. 3. We wouldwelcome the opportunity to discuss these itemsiurther with you and other. appropriate provincial staff. Yours sincerely Paul Skydt " I Acting Manager, GVRD Regional Parks PS/mit Attachments (3) C.C. Brian Clarke, Ministry of Land, Water and Air Protection Peter Jones, Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management Mike Murray, District of Maple Ridge Aeff Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - - - -. Forest Recreation Management Strategy March 12, 2003 Funding and Project Chilliwack Forest District Management Provided by: Ministry of Forests RECEIVEb PIAR14 2003 MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMEI Prepared by: Enfor Consultants Ltd. North Vancouver, BC Tel: (604) 984-0832 Email: mgreig@enfor.com Website: www.enfor.com Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... i Background............................................................................................................................ Process ...................................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE FOREST RECREATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY...........................................2 1.2 APPLICATION OF THE STRATEGY .............................................................................................2 1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION AND HIGHER LEVEL PLANS .......................................................3 2 SETTING .................................................................................................................... ..............5 3 VISION STATEMENT..............................................................................................................6 4 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES...........................................................................7 4.1 ACCESS (ROADS AND TRAILS).................................................................................................... 8 4. 1.1 Access Management....................................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 Trail Management .............. .......... ................................................................................. 10 4 .2 FOREST RECREATION ..................................... ................................... ................. .................... 12 4.2. 1 Motorized....................................................................................................................... 12 4.2.2 Non Motorized .............................................. ... .............................................................. 14 4 ,3 ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................................................... 15 4.3.1 General Environmental Issues ............................. ............................ ............................. 15 4.3.2 Water Quality ................................................................................................................ 16 4.3.3 Riparian Areas ............................................................................................................... 17 4.3.4 Wildlife........................................................................................................................... 18 4.4 CULTURAL AND HERITAGE VALUES .............................. ............................... ...................... ....... 19 4 .5INDUSTRY .............................................................................................................................. 19 4.5.1 Timber Haivesting ......................................................................................................... 19 4.5.2 Minerals and Aggregates ............................. .................................. .. ............................. 21 4.5.3 Commercial Tourism and Other Commercial Interests................................................. 22 4.6 VISUAL QUALITY..................................................................................................................... 22 4.7 GENERAL ISSUES ................................................................................................................... 23 5 IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................................24 5.1 AD HOC USERS GROUP........................................................................................................ 24 5.2 COMMUNICATION ...................................................... ............................................................ 24 5.3 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STRATEGY ..................................................................................... 25 5.4 PREPARATION OF RESOURCE USE MAPS ............................................................................... 25 5.5 CONTINUAL DPROVEMNT ..................................................................................................... 25 APPENDIX I STAKEHOLDERS AND PARTICIPANTS CONTACT LIST ................................... 26 APPENDIX 2 RESOURCE INFORMATION MAPS I AND 2 .......................................................28 APPENDIX 3 REFERRAL RESPONDENTS.................................................................................31 March 12, 2003 I En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy Executive Summary This Strategy was prepared through the collaborative involvement of the users of Blue I Mountain Provincial Forest (now referred to as the Ad Hoc Users Group) during 2001 to 2003 to address and articulate their resource management issues and interests. Most issues relate to forest recreation uses, though the Strategy also seeks to address issues that relate to industrial uses and environmental values. 1 I It represents the views of most planning participants, and outlines resource management issues identified by users of the area. It presents a vision statement and a series of I recommended goals, objectives and strategies. An Ad Hoc Users Group has been established to assist in the implementation to the extent possible. Implementing this strategy will require coordination and management, data collection and assessments, monitoring and preparation of plans. Given revised mandates and resourcing limitations in government, a key challenge for both the Ministry of Forests and • the Ad Hoc Users Group will be to develop an implementation model to successfully see I that elements of the strategy are addressed where possible. It is recommended that the Chilliwack Forest District consider the following in utilizing the Strategy: • identify which elements of this Strategy they can implement, which are the mandate of others, and which are best suited to the Ad Hoc Users Group; • utilize the Ad Hoc Users Group for referrals of forest recreation applications or forest development plans, and require that proponents consider this Strategy when undertaking planning and operations; and, • consult with other related land management agencies (e.g. Ministry of Energy and Mines) and request that the Ad Hoc User Group be referenced for other resource development applications (e.g. mineral development proposals.) 4 March 12, 2003 ii En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy I introduction Background Forest recreational uses and industrial uses in the Blue Mountain Provincial Forest have been taking place since the early 1900's. The second growth forests that predominate the 4385-hectare area and the existence of a road and trail network are both evidence of - historic forest management patterns. Located Northeast of Maple Ridge, the area was established as a Provincial Forest in 1963. The 'Provincial Forest' land use designation is intended to accommodate integrated resource use; it is generally a designation that is non- exclusive. Forest uses in the Blue Mountain Provincial Forest are managed by the Ministry of Forests'. Demand for both forest recreation and industrial activities has increased significantly over the last 10 to 15 years. The increase in motorized recreational use, for instance, has been driven in part by the closure of many lower mainland forest areas to motorized sport. By 2001, user-demands in the Blue Mountain Provincial Forest had reached a level where activities could no longer take place relatively independent of one another. Due to this level of use, the Chilliwack Forest District identified the need to get groups together to define issues and develop possible management strategies. Process In November 2001, the Ministry of Forests retained a consultant to facilitate the first Phase in developing a management strategy for the area. Phase 1 identified stakeholders. Through the use of submissions by interest groups and public meetings, an extensive list of interests and issues were identified and summarised 2. In July 2002, the Ministry of Forests retained a consultant to facilitate Phase 2 of the management strategy. This Phase brought together the Phase 1 participants to further develop resource management goals, objectives and strategies through a series of two facilitated workshops held in October and December of 2002. An explanation of the new role of the Ministry of Forests was presented at the December 2002 Workshop. Participants were informed that any future forest tenure holders in Blue Mountain Provincial Forest would have the responsibility of seeking input Y-:. from stakeholders during operational planning. At the end of the planning process, the participants decided to form an Ad Hoc Users Group to, among other things, provide advice on the use of, and management of uses on Blue Mountain. 1 As described in the Ministry of Forests Act and Forest Practice Code of BC Act and Regulations. Subsurface resource activities are managed by the Ministry of Energy and Mines. 2 The Blue Mountain Provincial Forest Phase 1 report and accompanying information is available on the Internet at http:/Iwww.for.clov.bc.ca/vancouvrldistrict/chilliwa/BlueMountains/BMPF intro. html. Other documents and maps are available at http://www.enfor.com/plans/managemefltJbmPf/ifldex.htm A March 12, 2003 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy At the December 2002 workshop, the title of the Strategy was revised to the "Forest Recreation Management Strategy" at the request of the participants, since most of the issues and planning participants are recreation use and enjoyment related. There are significant environmental and industrial values and issues that are addressed in this Strategy. The draft Strategy was developed in January, 2003 based on the workshops, input received, and previous planning work in 2002. Sections 3 and 4 were developed with input by the participants, and are a compilation of their collective interests in the use and management of Blue Mountain Provincial Forest. The draft was referred to participants in February, 2003 for comment, and was adjusted by the consultant based on written comments received. The Strategy was presented by the Ad Hoc Users Group to the District Manager, Chilliwack Forest District in March, 2003. 1.1 Purpose of the Forest Recreation Management Strategy This Strategy provides recommended management goals, objectives and strategies to guide operational planning for the following purposes: . maintain the integrity of the environment; • protect cultural and heritage values; • manage economic and forest recreational uses in a sustainable manner; and • coordinate activities occurring within Blue Mountain Provincial Forest with adjacent landowners. The Strategy will provide a platform on which to build long term communication, education and management goals for the users of Blue Mountain. 1.2 Application of the Strategy This Strategy applies to forest uses on Crown land within Blue Mountain Provincial Forest. The Strategy does not apply to private land, such as the 20 hectare private lot located 2.5 kilometres east of Blue Mountain Peak. The area encompasses provincial forest denoted in the map titled "Blue Mountain Provincial Forest Strategy", March 12, 2003 (page 4). The Strategy does not apply directly to the two Woodlot Licences operated by Blue Mountain Woodlot and BCIT Forest Society since they have approved management plans in place. However, it is recommended that these licensees consider the strategies in this document when undertaking forestry activities. Both licensees were participants in the Strategy and are supportive of the goals, objectives and strategies. 4 March 12, 2003 2 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy 1.3 Environmental Legislation and Higher Level Plans This Strategy is intended to provide guidance for the management of forest uses in Blue Mountain. It does not supersede any higher level plan, or provincial or federal environmental legislation. Forest practices and uses on Provincial Forests are controlled largely through the Forest Practices Code of BC Act land its replacement the Forest and Range Protection Act), provincial environmental legislation (e.g. Water Act) and federal environmental legislation (e.g. Fisheries Act). There are no higher level plans in place as of January 2003. However, the Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management is planning to undertake Landscape Unit Planning in 2004 for the Alouette Landscape Unit, which covers Blue Mountain. The Landscape Unit Plan is intended to address the conservation of biological diversity by identifying old growth management areas and targets for wildlife tree retention. Objectives developed in the landscape unit plan will be considered a higher level plan, and so will supersede this Strategy; it is hoped that these are developed giving consideration to this Strategy. March 12, 2003 3 En for Consultants Ltd. I Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I all WiAL&ii I Fi Blue Provincial Legend _ I Woodlots IL Lake ±t March 12, 2003 4 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy 2 Setting Blue Mountain Provincial Forest (BMPF) is located Northeast of Maple Ridge. The plan area is bounded to the north by Alouette Lake and Golden Ears Provincial Park. It is approximately 50 kilometres east of Vancouver and 15 kilometres Northwest of Mission. Mission Tree Farm License No. 26 and Alouette East Small Business Forest Enterprise I Program Administrative Area border the Blue Mountain Provincial Forest to the east. ) The District of Maple Ridge borders the southern boundary, and provincial Crown land borders the western side of the plan area (refer to location Map on page 4). The plan area encompasses 4385 hectares of Provincial Forest, of which 506 hectares are currently being managed through two woodlot licence tenures, W0038 (Blue Mountain Woodlot) and W0007 (BCIT Forest Society). The Approximately 70 percent of the Blue Mountain forest is 30-90 remaining 3879 hectares have years old. The remaining forested area, mostly in the higher no specific forest tenure. elevations, consists offorests older than 150 years. Most of the area has been harvested in the past. This has resulted in the lush second growth forests that predominate the area, and the series of old roads and trails (Alouette Lake has been used to transport logs). The southern portion of the plan area is charactensed by second growth coniferous forests on gentle slopes (generally less than 40 percent gradient). The northern portion bordering Alouette Lake consists of 70-110 year old coniferous forest on more rugged terrain (with many upper slopes greater than 60 percent gradient). The central northeast portion consists of old growth forests, interspersed with areas harvested approximately 15-35 years ago. Numerous creeks are found throughout BMPF and a few small lakes are located at higher elevations. The streams in the northern portion flow into Alouette Lake except for a few streams in the Northeast that flow into Stave River. The majority of the creeks in the central and southern part of plan area flow into Kanaka Creek. A small portion of the land in the Southeast corner of the plan area drains into Whonnock Creek. BMPF forms part of the Fraser Timber Supply Area (TSA), and is part of the landbase that contributes to the allowable annual cut of the Fraser TSA. Only a portion of the forested area (less than 80 percent) is considered commercially viable (the net timber harvesting...landbase-is 3072 .hecta.res) by th....Ministry......Forests. due to .pre-existing. environmental, social and economic considerations. These considerations are denoted on the BMPF Resource Information Maps 1 of 2 and 2 of 2, located in Appendix 2. Considerations include: • primary forest recreational activities; • visually sensitive slopes; • deer winter ranges; • streams and lakes; • areas excluded from timber supplies, including most of the old growth forest; and, • steep slopes in view from Alouette Lake. 4 March 12, 2003 5 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strate 3 Vision Statement The following describes the participants' future vision for Blue Mountain: Blue Mountain Provincial Forest will continue to exist as a beautiful place where human activity is managed to ensure ecosystem health and cultural integrity and to provide for a balance of recreation and economic uses. The quality of the environment will be maintained or improved including ecosystem function and health, biodiversity, threatened and endangered species, water quality and ripanan habitat. Blue Mountain will contribute to the spiritual, emotional, cultural and recreational well- being of the Lower Mainland population base. Visitors will have the opportunity to experience and learn about the cultural and natural history of the area. Access will be provided for a variety of recreational activities ranging from low intensity uses in remote areas to higher intensity uses in areas that are more easily accessible. Recreation management in Blue Mountain will serve as a model of cooperative use among motorised and non-motorised users. Economic prosperity will be supported through economic development opportunities that provide local benefits and are in keeping with the ecological and recreational characteristics of Blue Mountain. Ongoing stewardship will be supported by user groups and community volunteers who will. heip to ensure that Blue Mountain is managed to support a variety of recreation, economic and educational uses that are in harmony with the long term ecological and cultural integrity of the area. JA March 12, 2003 6 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy 4 Goals, Objectives and Strategies This section includes a description of management goals, objectives and strategies developed by the planning participants, which are recommended to guide resource management. The objectives and strategies are categorized according to the resource value or activity they apply to (e.g. water, forest recreation, horseback riding, harvesting et cetera). The goals, objectives and strategies represent the views of most planning participants. However, the Blue Mountain and Kanaka Creek Conservation Group and the Western Canada Wilderness Committee indicated that they were not in agreement with the Strategy. These groups are not in agreement with any proposed logging activity. This Strategy assumes that management activities will all meet legislative requirements and commitments made under the Forest Practices Code and related environmental legislation. It should also consider the influence of the adjacent Woodlot Management Plans. The consultant hired to coordinate the strategy for the Ministry of Forests recommends that Qualified Registered Professionals be utilized for assessments and recommendations where there are issues relating to safety or environmental impacts. In particular, Qualified Registered Professionals (engineers, biologists, geoscientists, and foresters) should be consulted on issues relating to road safety/decommissioning/upgrading, water quality and quantity, biological diversity and environmental management, visual quality, and timber management. The Chilliwack Forest District can assist in identifying individuals qualified for these assessments. Interestsllssues The items outlined in this section briefly describe the issues raised during Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Strategy development. Interests/Issues are used to develop the goals, objectives and strategies. Goals A goal describes a desired end state with respect to a particular interest. Goals are not normally expressed in quantitative terms and their achievement is not time-limited. For multiple related uses such as motorized recreational uses, one overall goal has been established to cover the variety of sub uses. Objectives ('What') Objectives are more specific than goal statements and describe what should be done to achieve the goal. Objectives should be measurable and provide a basis for evaluation. Strategies ('How') Strategies describe ways to achieve objectives. I I I I I I March 12, 2003 7 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strate 4.1 Access (roads and trails) 4.1.1 Access Management Interests/Issues • Concern that increasing access into the plan area will result in past problems of dumping and/or burning of stolen vehicles and/or other irresponsible behaviour by vandals. • In the past, access into the plan area by the public has resulted in timber harvesting equipment vandalism and additional road maintenance. • Additional road building in the area is seen by some users as a threat to their recreational experience and to the integrity of area's ecosystems. • Need for an access management plan that includes coordination with adjacent areas such as the Municipality of Maple Ridge or the District of Mission. • Need for parking arrangements for forest recreation users with consideration to local traffic and property owners. • Liability concerns with allowing forest recreation users to access BMPF. • Suggestion by some to restrict vehicle access to gravel roads. • Numerous complaints and requests have been registered to restrict access to BMPF via the BC Hydro transmission line and along Dewdney Trunk Road. • Gates at access points have been the targets of vandals. • Some forest recreation users would like to reopen access via McNutt Road, however adjacent property owners and nearby residents do not support this, citing historical problems such as vandalism, late night parties, property damage, high speed vehicles, and altercations with users. • Closing access via 256th is a problem for some forest recreation user groups. • Access to the area is from both land and water (Alouette Lake), and the lake access needs should be considered in development of strategies. Goal o Manage and plan access in a manner that protects environmental values and forest uses, and that respects adjacent landowners. Objectives Strategies - 1. Develop a system to 1.1 Continue gated access on McNutt Road to control manage access through entry of vehicles and use gate keys or magnetic residential areas. cards that cannot be copied. 1.2 Develop a gated access corridor for motorcyclists at 256th Street to access the area above the hydro right of way (i.e. alternate gate before the Corrections facility). 1.3 Instigate user fees, based upon annual licensing fee and user type. Vehicles within BMPF would require a decal or bar code on the windshield authorizing permitted admittance. Objectives and Strategies continued on next page... March 12, 2003 8 - En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy Strategies * 1.4 Investigate the creation of a pass-through for hikers, mountain bikes and horses at Stevens Road (256th St.) with fences to be left in place. 1 .5 Consider developing an access location away from residential neighbourhoods, especially McNutt Road and Blue Mountain Crescent. 1.6 Co-ordinate access planning with adjacent landowners, including TFL 26 and local residents. 1.7 Consider relocating forest road access for recreational users from McNutt Road to another access point (Note: The District of Mission's Forestry Department are opposed to relocating recreation access through Mission Tree Farm Licence TFL 26.) 1.8 Investigate the feasibility of hiring a full time caretaker. Objectives 1. Develop a system to manage access through residential areas. Continued from previous page Plan for parking so that 2.1 Create parking/staging area(s) for user groups away users do not cause from residential areas. undue disruption to adjacent landowners. The timing of access 3.1 Consider restrictions for some uses during certain uses should not cause periods of the day/season/year. undue disruption to adjacent landowners. 3.2 Encourage tocal communities to manage the traits. 4. Plan access to minimize or mitigate adverse affects to water, fish, wildlife, vegetation, soil, and forest recreation uses, interests and tenure holders. 4.1 Develop an access management plan that describes the current and future access needs. 4.2 Use, develop or promote innovative or best management practices in planning, construction, maintenance and deactivation activities, while considering economic constraints. 4.3 Ensure that proposed development access activities are included in forest development plans, and make plans available for public review and comment. 4.4 Conduct an inventory of roads, trails and stream - crOssings to identify them on a map; identify the environmental and safety liability, and the needs for the repair or decommissioning of roads. - 4.5 Seek resources to stabilize or repair roads to a safe condition commensurate with use 3. Objectives and Strategies continued on next page... Consider seeking funding from future Licensee under Forest Investment Account (FIA). FIA makes funds available to forest licensees to undertake various sustainable forest management activities. A March 12, 2003 9 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strate Strategies - 4.6 Manage the timing of activities. 4.7 Deactivate or repair roads if they are unsafe or may lead to environmental damage, based on an assessment by a qualified registered professional. 4.8 Ensure that proposed non-forest access development (e.g. commercial tourism, mineral and hydro development) are made available for public review and comment. 4. Plan access to minimize or mitigate adverse affects to water, fish, wildlife, vegetation, soil, and forest recreation uses, interests and tenure holders. Continuedfrom previous page 4.1.2 Trail Management Interests/Issues • Desire by some forest recreation users to develop new trails in specific areas (such as a multi-use, east-west, non-motorised route to connect along hydro right of way and a mountain bike trail along the western edge of BMPF). • The unauthorized building of trails within the BMPF and into adjacent parks results in an excessive number of trails and an uncoordinated system for management. • Clarification to the public and user groups is required regarding which motorised and non-motorised activities are permitted within certain areas of the plan. • Need for proper trail markings to direct flow and accommodate multiple users. • Need for respect and consideration between users of the same trails. • Some feel that existing four-wheel drive trails should not be modified to accommodate vehicles that cannot currently pass. • Concern that most roads are in poor condition and may require upgrading and maintenance for fire control access and non-industrial users. • Concern with respect to improper road deactivation. Goal o Manage and plan trails in a manner that protects environmental values, resource stewardship ethics and forest uses, and that respects adjacent landowners and other trail users. Objectives 1. Plan the orderly development and use of forest recreation trails. Strategies - - 1.1 Conduct an inventory and classification of trails. 1.2 Prepare a trail management plan with a reference to the regulatory framework that may apply (Section 102 of the Forest Practices Code of BC Act); identify which trails should be retained and those which should be closed; identify site rehabilitation measures. March 12, 2003 10 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy and Strategies continued on next Strategies : 1.3 Establish a series of multi-use connecting trails to access areas of forest recreation and usage connected to key access points including parking areas. • Develop a forest recreation corridor that parallels the main branch of Kanaka Creek (North Fork). • Construct new roads and trails to access areas near the summit of Blue Mountain. • Develop an east-west trail as detailed in the GVRD Greenways Plan to carry forest recreation walkers, equestrians and cyclists from Mission to Pitt River and any connection required for accessing this trail (e.g. KCRP-FC and Trans Canada Trail). • Develop a trail from Blue Mountain to Mission's Community Forest, Golden Ears Provincial Park and beyond. • Design new trails in consideration of other existing and future uses. • Publish a trail listing. • Rehabilitate trails/roads as required as per the outcome of the trail management ptan • Limit or control the number and location of different user trails. 1.4 Seek or develop resources to manage trails 1.5 Trails that might be temporarily closed due to other uses should be re-established as promptly as possible. 1.6 Prepare guidelines for the construction of trails. 1.7 Clarify the liability for users on trails. 1. Plan the orderly development and use of forest recreation trails. Continued from previous page 2. Maintain trails and 2.1 Coordinate the maintenance of multi-use trails by monitor use different user groups. March 12, 2003 11 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy 4.2 Forest Recreation 4.2.1 Motorized (including four wheel driving, motor bike riding, all terrain vehicles and snowmobiling, etc.) Interests/Issues The following issues were common to all forms of motorised use in the plan area: • Need for responsible use by group members and non-members using area as proper etiquette is not being followed by some frequent users. • Need for accurate map with road and trail locations • Concern relating to the degradation of roads, trails and streams (siltation) due to lack of bridges and/or culverts. • Concern that large groups of riders and/or vehicles travelling at high speeds pose danger to other trail users. • Concern relating to unauthorized trail construction and use. • High noise levels from engines are a concern to neighbouring residents, especially along McNutt Road and Blue Mountain Crescent. • Concern about damage to other forest recreation trails and forest plantations by drivers who do not remain on the four-wheel drive roads. • Lack of areas available for motorised recreation in the tower mainland. • Increasing pressure from non-motorised users to eliminate four-wheel driving activities in the BMPF. • Concern regarding the publics' perception of four-wheel drive users. This perception may be based on the actions of a few drivers and/or unsanctioned drivers in the BMPF. • There is pressure from non-motorised users to close motorbike trails. • There is a desire from motorbike users to maintain access. • Conflicts with road use between snowmobiles and vehicles in the winter. Goal o Conduct motorised recreational activities in a safe manner that protects environmental values and forest uses, allows for integrated forest recreation use with other user groups, and respects adjacent landowners. Objectives Strategies 1. Prevent or resolve 1.1 All forest recreation user groups should routinely conflicts between forest provide (future) forest licensees (and MoF in the recreation users and absence of a licensee) with updated, mapped industrial interests, locations of known travel corridors and current uses. 1.2 Industrial interests consider existing and future trail networks when preparing development proposals. Forest recreation interests should respect existing development activities when planning a new trail. Objectives and Strategies continued on next page... A. March 12, 2003 12 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strate Prevent or resolve conflicts between forest recreational users and environmental values. • -- ' - .......................................- Strategies * - 1.3 Forest licensees notify known forest recreation users in writing to provide an opportunity for input to forest development plans that may impact known recreation activities. 1 .4 Forest recreation users should discuss desires for special events with licensees and the Chilliwack Forest District. 1 .5.MoF to consult with forest recreational interests in the development of any access management plans. Endeavour to share the land base with commercial recreation and industrial activities with a view towards sharing the landbase among users. 2.1 Encourage public awareness and education on appro- priate use of forest recreation areas. 2.2 Initiate 'record and report' type programs and limited access / key programs within the motorised vehicle community. 2.3 Develop a Code of Conduct for Users etves - Prevent or resolve conthcts between forest recreation users and industrial interests. Continued from previous page • Investigate other Code of Conduct formats such as the Belcarra Model (reference to Eugene Duruissea's presentation at October Workshop); • Develop environmental standards covering construction, use and maintenance; • Include an educational component. 3. Prevent or resolve conflicts between the various forest recreational user groups. 3.1 Encourage public awareness and education on appro- priate use of forest recreation areas. 3.2 Initiate 'record and report' type programs and limited access / key programs within the motorised vehicle community. 3.3 Develop and/or improve mechanisms for notification, consultation and conflict resolution amongst the user groups. 3.4 Foster education and co-operation amongst user groups regarding etiquette. 3.5 Maintain the features that provide for the diverse range of quality forest recreation experiences. 3.6 Develop a Code of Conduct for Users Investigate other Code of Conducts such as the Belcarra Model (contact Eugene Duruisseau); . Include an educational component Objectives and Strategies continued on next page... March 12, 2003 13 En for Consultants Ltd. 0 10- Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management St rate bjectives Strategies - 74 3 Prevent or resolve 3.7 Require motor vehicles using the trails to be licensed. various forest recreational user groups conflicts between the 3.8 Determine appropriate depth of snow to limit use of 4WD and ATV and to maintain snow pack for snowmobiles. 3.9 Develop or update a forest recreation management plan. • Identify the various recreation uses, pattern of uses. • Consider the capacity of the area. • Identify infrastructure needs to support activities. • Recognize that there is a distinction between winter and summer motorised uses. • Refer to previous forest recreation management study by the Chilliwack Forest District. 4.2.2 Non Motorized (including mountain and road biking, horseback riding, hiking, etc.) Interests/Issues The following issues were common to all forms of non-motorised uses (mountain biking, horseback riding, hiking and other) in the plan area: • Need for responsible use by group members and non-members using area. • Need for other user groups to recognize mountain biking as legitimate recreational event. • Soil erosion of trails near creeks leading to creek siltation. (Environmental impacts - reference to using properly built fords). • Informing frequent users of proper etiquette. • Unauthorized trail building and poor trail conditions. • Need for 'mountain-bike only' trails. • BMPF is a potential site for sanctioned racing events or backcountry trails. • Need for controlled construction of 'extreme' obstacles for all forms of recreation (such as elevated riding and teeter-totters).. . • Cyclists should ride up and down the mountain, rather than drive up in trucks. • Desire to re-establish trails within the plan area to relieve pressure from adjacent Golden Ears Park - with connectivity to existing trails outside of the plan area. • Rider and equine safety issues including: trail degradation (e.g. deep ruts); loud noises which startle horses (firearms and motorised vehicles); motorised and non- motorised vehicles that are fast moving and startle horses; and unleashed dogs. • Water quality issues at creek crossings. • Loss of riding trails or access due to barriers such as fences along 256th Street. • Need to maintain opportunities for other non-motorised recreational activities such as hiking, bird watching, camping, canoeing, cross country skiing, fishing, hunting, March 12, 2003 14 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy jogging, kayaking, paragliding, nature walking, sight seeing, and snowshoeing. Add sense of solitude. . Consider water access needs. Goal o Conduct activities in a safe manner that protects environmental values and forest uses, allows for integrated forest recreation use with other user groups, and respects adjacent landowners Objectives• . StrategieE Objectives and strategies for the above issues have been addressed in previous sections: Access management (4.1) and Forest Recreation Management (motorized) (4.2) 4.3 Environment 4.3.1 General Environmental Issues I Interests/Issues • The physical carrying capacity of the BMPF ecosystem is a concern as the numbers of users and variety of uses increases. Some activities may have adverse effects on soil erosion, stream sedimentation, wildlife and plant species in particular seasons and locations. • Lack of suitable inventories. • Need to define an acceptable level of environmental impact to determine the level of industrial and forest recreation use that can take place. • Concern about environmental impacts to the plan area given the increasing demands of users in the BMPF due to increasing population in the Lower Mainland. • Concern regarding unauthorized campfires. Goal o Minimize environmental risk and mitigate potential negative impacts on the environment by human activity. Objectives Strategies 1. Manage for biological 1.1 Identify if biodiversity is being conserved at the diversity, landscape level. Where there are deficiencies, consider solutions such as creating recruitment areas. 1 .2 For future activities, manage for biodiversity at the stand level. Objectives and Strategies continued on next page... 4 March 12, 2003 15 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strafe .Obje'ctives. 2. Make informed decisions about environmental risks and assess impacts 2.1 Conduct scientifically based studies such as base-line studies, hydrological studies and/or refer to data from existing plans or studies and local knowledge. 2.2 Utilize the results from baseline studies, data and -- assessments to manage for environmental risk. 4.3.2 Water Quality Interests/Issues • Concern regarding the maintenance of water (surface and ground) quality for human consumption and for aquatic habitat. • A hydrological assessment, including mapping and classification of watercourses and watershed boundaries, an analysis of seasonal water flows, licensed use, sedimentation, and pollution sources is required. • Adverse effect On water quality as a result of forest recreation and industrial activities. • Need for groundwater management and protection. • Potential future drinking water sources for communities require management to limit access. • Dumping of materials into the watercourses adjacent to urban areas is a problem. • Soil erosion and siltation of water, particularly along the Hydro right of way. • Water quality and quantity issues in the lower portion of Kanaka Creek. Goal o Protect, maintain and restore water quality and quantity throughout the plan area for healthy domestic drinking water and productive fish habitat and aquatic ecosystems. 1. Recognize significant importance of ground water as a source of drinking water and undertake (require4) an evaluation of ground water flow. 1.1 Identify licensed and non-licensed water users for the purposes of resource development planning and referral. 1.2 Identify potential areas of concern with regards to siltation, terrain stability and surface erosion hazard through overview mapping. 1.3 Evaluate ground water flow to understand risks from activities in the area. 1.4 Support reclamation and restoration projects on a priority basis, and identify areas in need of special management attention with respect to water quality management. Objectives and Strategies continued on next page... Some felt groundwater flow and quality were so important that a study should be required. March 12, 2003 16 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strafe Manage human activities to maintain or enhance water quality and minimize water pollution. Improve the understanding of the water resources in the plan area. Strategies -i 4- igi 24, - .... .-,. 1.5 Incorporate sediment control strategies into resource development plans. 1.6 Conduct awareness training about the preventative measures of sediment control and erosion events. The target audience includes industrial interests, private landowners and forest recreation users. 1.7 Ensure that construction activity, primarily for roads and trails, does not disrupt natural drainage patterns leading to erosion, mass wasting, and debris torrents. 2.1 Determine the current status of water use inventories (E.g. Ministry of Water, Air and Land Protection). 2.2 Undertake inventory projects to identify and assess sources of water pollution and make recommendations for corrective measures. 2.3 Provide opportunities for the installation of water quality monitoring stations. 2.4 Support remediation projects on a priority basis. 2.5 Provide for adequate enforcement where necessary. 3.1 Conduct water discharge analysis to determine the timing and level of water flows. 3.2 Unlicensed domestic water use should be registered with the agency responsible for the allocation of water rights so their use is known and can be considered in resource planning and licensing decisions. 3.3 Identify the location of licenced and unlicenced water users. kObjetWe. Recognize significant importance of ground water as a source of drinking water and undertake (require) an evaluation of ground water flow. Continued from previous page 4.3.3 Riparian Areas Interests/Issues. • Increasing damage to in-stream and riparian habitats due to disturbances resulting from any development or forest recreation activities. Goal o Conserve the natural diversity of riparian areas, including streams, lakes and wetlands. Some felt groundwater flow and quality were so important that a study should be required. March 12, 2003 17 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy Objectives -Strategies Restore damaged aquatic and riparian habitat. 1 .1 Identify riparian areas and aquatic habitats that would benefit from restoration or enhancement works. 1.2 Undertake stream restoration projects as identified in 1.1 above. 1.3 Encourage community enhancement programs such as "adopt a stream" or uclean up day" for streams impacted by urban, forest recreation or industrial development activities. 1.4 Establish user-accountability for restoring damaged riparian areas. Reduce the impacts of 2.1 Develop and implement rehabilitation plans where development and forest needed. recreation activities on 2.2 Use appropriate riparian and fish habitat guidelines 6 in-stream and ripanan and/or best management practices during planning habitats. and development7. 2.3 Educate and inform resource users regarding the potential to cause negative impacts on riparian areas. 4.3.4 Wildlife Interests/Issues • Lack of wildlife and wildlife habitat needs (including wildlife corridors) • Concern that planning will occur before wildlife concerns can be factored in. Goal A diversity of habitat for naturally occurring species. 1. Manage human use to 1.1 Develop inventories to understand wildlife habitats. reduce impacts on 1.2 Manage activities to avoid negative impacts on key wildlife. habitat area. 1.3 Educate and inform BMPF users on potential negative impacts on wildlife habitat from various uses in the area. 6 Such as practices identified in the Forest Practices Code regulations. Examples include setbacks for watercourses, waste management, storm water management, or in-stream work windows. March 12, 2003 ig En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy 4.4 Cultural and Heritage Values3 Interests/Issues • Three generations of loggers have worked on Blue Mountain; • Limited access restricts carrying out traditional and cultural use activities; on the other hand, broad access can compromise cultural sites or activities. • Hunting, gathering and cultural use activities may be impacted by other uses or activities. • Presence of non-First Nation historical sites such as plank roads, reference marker for 1912, survey and old cabins. • There is high potential for known archaeological sites. • Goals objectives and strategies will not abrogate or derogate aboriginal title. Goal c Maintain cultural heritage values. 1. Minimize adverse 1.1 Identify key cultural heritage values. impacts on known sites, 1.2 Manage access to respect traditional and cultural use activities or uses. I activities. 1.3 Consult with Katzie First Nation with respect to proposed development activities. 4.5 Industry 4.5.1 Timber Harvesting Interests/Issues • Concern that noise from harvesting operations may disturb lake users, including campers. • Concern that harvesthig activities may impact ecosystem health (including on ground water, streams, and topsoil runoff). • Concern regarding public safety and loss of use during active harvesting operations. • Desire to maintain the western slopes of BMPF along Alouette Lake in a natural manner to sustain user enjoyment from Alouette Lake and Golden Ears Park. • Concern that large woody debris, possibly resulting from harvesting, may enter the Alouette Lake and create a hazard to the Hydro Dam faci!ities or operation. • Forest activities should have no detrimental impact on the transmission line facilities. • Concern regarding damaged tree plantations (possibly from motorised vehicles). 8 These goals, objectives and strategies will not abrogate or derogate Aboriginal rights and title. March 12, 2003 19 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy Goal Manage the timber harvesting land base in the BMPF provincial forest as productive crown forest contributing to timber supply in the Chilliwack Forest District. ObthvesJ rd Harmonize activities 1.1 Forest licensees to restore or provide alternate trails between industrial for forest recreation if existing trails become unusable activities/uses and non- or dangerous as a result of industrial activities industrial activities/uses. 1.2 Forest licensees to post notice or provide one month's notice to user groups where trails are to be temporarily out of commission. 1.3 Licensees should consider forest recreational uses and events in preparation of development plans. 1.4 Forest recreation users should discuss desires for special events with licensees and the ChiUiwack Forest District. Provide public input into 2.1 Identify key stakeholders (such as the BMPF forest management stakeholders list) and contact them for input into plans. Management Plans and Forest Development Plans 2.2 Advertise these plans in the local newspaper and provide an opportunity for a public viewing and comment. 2.3 Ensure that the proponent undertakes a review of the objectives and strategies in the BMPF Forest Recreation Management Strategy prior to undertaking forest planning. 2.4 Licensees should make every effort to contact all stakeholders identified in the BMPF Forest Recreation Management Strategy (see Appendix 1). 2.5 Explore funding mechanisms, such as Forest Investment Account, to implement a mutually acceptable strategy from this document. Forest practices should be environmentally, economically and socially acceptable. 3.1 Ensure that requirements under the Forest Practices Code are met. 3.2 Ensure that forest plans address the full range of other non-timber values. 3.3 Establish an acceptable rate of harvest and harvest priority consistent with the Timber Supply Review. 3.4 Ensure adequate reforestation of forest development areas. March 12, 2003 20 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy 4.5.2 Minerals and Aggregates Interests/Issues • Exploration and mine development will impact other values. • Impacts associated with exploration and development are a concern to recreational users (visual quality, noise, dust, access, trucks, affects on groundwater and environmental contamination). • Mineral potential in the area is unknown by the BMPF participants. Goal o Exploration and development that is sensitive to other values on Blue Mountain. 1.1 Notify the Ministry of Energy and Mines' District Inspector of the BMPF Forest Recreation Management Strategy and: • provide the Inspector and the proponent with a copy of the BMPF Forest Recreation Management Strategy document and contact information for the Ad Hoc Users Group; • request that Notices of Work for mechanical surface disturbance within the BMPF area be referred to the BMPF Ad Hoc Users Group contact person for review and comment. 1.2 Encourage recreational users to familiarize them-selves with mineral development management via the website at: www.em..qov.bc.ca/Mining/Healsafe/mineereg.htm 1. Harmonize activities between industrial activities/uses and non- industrial activities/uses 2. Provide public input into mineral development proposals within the BMPF area. 2.1 Request that District Inspector consider setting the following conditions on the Notice of Work Permit as per feed back from the Ad Hoc Users Group: • provide one month's notice to user groups where trails are to be temporarily out of commission. • proponent to consider recreational uses and events in preparation of development plans 2.2 Request that any proposals for surface disturbance on mineral claims be made known to the Ad Hoc Users Group by the District Inspector of Mines. Request that proposals involving surface disturbance be advertized for public comment where applicable under appropriate legislation (Note: this process is undergoing a transition as of March 2003; contact Ministry of Energy and Mines to clarify the process) 2.3 Ensure that future proponents undertake a review of the objectives and strategies in the BMPF Forest Recreation Management Strategy prior to undertaking mineral development planning. (continued on next page...) March 12, 2003 21 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy Stratees : 2.4 Future proponents should make every effort to contact all stakeholders identified in the BMPF Forest Recreation Management Strategy (see Appendix 1). 3.1 Ensure that the requirements under the Mineral Exploration Code and Mines Act are met. 3.2 Ensure that mineral development plans address the full range of other non-timber values. Objectives Provide public input into mineral development proposals within the BMPF area. Continued from previous page Mineral development practices should be environmentally, economically and socially acceptable. 4.5.3 Commercial Tourism and Other Commercial Interests While there were no interests or issues raised regarding other commercial and industrial activities, participants felt that all such activities should be undertaken to harmonize with recreational uses as well as other uses on Blue Mountain, in an environmentally, economically and socially acceptable manner. 4.6 Visual Quality Interests/Issues • The view from Golden Ears Park and Alouette Lake to the northern part of the BMPF needs to be considered in planning. • The view from the south to the southern part of the mountain needs to be preserved and maintained. Goals o Maintain scenic quality in Blue Mountain Provincial Forest. Objectives Strategies 1. Meet the recommended 1.1 identify areas of key visual concern and identify the most visual quality classes, sensitive viewpoints for visual management. 1.2 Apply visual design techniques to resource develop- ment proposals. 1.3 Conduct visual impact assessments for resource development. 1.4 Utilize existing routes and roads where possible to minimize visual impacts. 1.5 Protect viewscapes in sensitive areas in accordance with recommended Visual Quality Classes and existing visual management framework. March 12, 2003 22 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy 4.7 Genera/Issues Interests/Issues A number of general issues were raised as follows: • Concern about the infringement of urban development within the boundaries of the BMPF. • Need to ensure tourism opportunities are included in future planning. • Need to ensure consistency between the management plans of adjacent Woodlots and the BMPF Strategy. • Concern regarding the ability of government to enforce and monitor recreational and timber harvesting activities under the Forest Practices Code. • Consider adopting some management strategies used by GETPARC, Buntzen Ridge Wilderness Recreation and Parks Association, Whistler Demonstration Forest, and other successful multi-use areas. • General lack of communication and co-operation between users. Objectives and strategies for the above issues have been addressed in previous sections. --. March 12, 2003 -- .. 23 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strate 5 implementation Considerations This section describes elements that arose during planning which can be utilized to guide the successful implementation of this Strategy. The key elements are as follows: • creation of an Ad Hoc Users Group; • improved communication amongst users; • implementation of the Strategy; • preparation of resource use maps; and, • continual improvement. 5.1 Ad Hoc Users Group At the conclusion of the December 2002 Workshop, participants decided that it would be effective to form an Ad Hoc Users Group to work out challenges and look for opportunities, and to carry forward elements of this Strategy. Some items that could be addressed by the Users Group include: • Explore potential funding sources to implement a mutually acceptable strategy from this document and assist with related projects. Consider funding options under the Forest Investment Account 9 or other grants, and mechanisms to secure funding. • Identify how the user group can assist with implementing the strategies. • Identify liability matters to be clarified in the event that the user group wishes to undertake any management roles or development activities. • Look to other similar groups (e.g. Belcarra Regional Park) for information on governance, responsibilities, liability, et cetera. As of March, 2003, preliminary meetings had been held to organize the Ad Hoc User Group. 5.2 Communication A few points were raised through the planning process regarding the value of effective communication. The following should be considered during implementation of the Strategy: - - • If issues and strategies can be well articulated to forest managers, industrial users and forest recreation user groups, it is more likely that they will be accounted for adequately. • Use open communication to deal with conflicts. The contact for FIA information on project eligibility and funding is Rina Gemeinhardt, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Vancouver, tel: (604) 484-3490 En for Consultants Ltd. March 12, 2003 24 Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strate 5.3 Implementation of the Strategy Implementing this strategy will require coordination and management, data collection and assessments, monitoring and preparation of plans. Given revised mandates and resourcing limitations in government, a key challenge for both the Ministry of Forests and the Ad Hoc Users Group will be to develop an implementation model to successfully see that elements of the strategy are addressed where possible. This Strategy has gone a significant distance to clarify the issues and bring parties together in a manner that should lead to more harmonious use of the area. The resulting formation of the Ad Hoc Users Group represents a significant opportunity to land managerSaS a cohesive umbrella group with which to reference referrals of forest recreation applications, development applications and resource management plans. It is recommended that the Chilliwack Forest District consider the following in utilizing the Strategy: • identify which elements of this Strategy they can implement, which are the mandate of others, and which are best suited to the Ad Hoc Users Group; • utilize the Ad Hoc Users Group for referrals of forest recreation applications or forest development plans, and require that proponents consider this Strategy when undertaking planning and operations; and, • consult with other related land management agencies (e.g. Ministry of Energy and Mines) and request that the Ad Hoc User Group be referenced for other resource development applications (e.g. mineral development proposals.) 5.4 Preparation of Resource Use Maps Resource users should clarify on maps the current use areas and provide these to the Chilliwack Forest District to help guide forest development planning. Some mapping assistance is available from the forest district 10. 5.5 Continual Improvement The Forest Recreation Management Strategy should be reviewed periodically, possibly annually, with the Chilliwack Forest District, to determine the need to update strategies. 10 Chifliwack Forest District contact is Len Leroux, RPF March 12, 2003 25 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest RecreatiOn Management Strate Appendix 1 Stakeholders and Participants Contact List (as of March2003) ; BLUE MOUNTAIN PROVINCIAL FOREST - PARTICIPANT CONTACT LIST AFFILIATION PRIMARY PHONE # ALTERNATE PHONE # Email Addresses I CONTACT 604- CONTACT 604- , 7EièldNtUrâlists Mil3J • ghaiii 690J Tê4ëi7 c A ouette River Management Tom Saare C. 011enberger Society Gerry Miller u1Hoo! ?c: rI& W1 !W JI2I BC I-iydro Gary liousko - 0 lbl 3234 BCIT Forest Society Roaid Kley Jonathan Smyth Jace Standish 432-8862 ,In a Blue Mountain & Kanaka Creek John Castiello 462-7617 Dwight Milford 463-3389 Conservation Group Dawn Paley 462-9843 Mike Gildersleeve bftB -299S 12 OR fi1ada Pacific Trails Assn Eugene 931-6930 Don Doerksen Duruisseau Crosstrails Adventures of. BC District of Mission Kelly Cameron 1 I. .. 0;. Endurance Riders Assn of BC Fred Voglmaier Terre Obrennan ArnoldDreihaar 7I NO EMAIl!, yy MOM - - Meeting r. I . . lnformatlon4o6or - V 462O970'J 0 Four Wheel Drive Assn of BC Jeff Steiger Wes Rempel 306-0091 0 0 Gerry Bolduc Paul Gagnon 421-5322 Continued on next page... March 12, 2003 26 En fOr Consultants Ltd. S S S S S S S S S S S S S 5 S S S S S S S S S S S S S Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy - AFFILIATION . .. . PRIMARY . PHONE # ALTERNATE PHONE # Email Addresses ; CONTACT 604- CONTACT 604- Golden Ears Athletics . Andrew Lenton - . 1_ !2 t Hammond StreamiceeperS Jim Bradshaw 40-0117 . 3eoffId4 Kanaka Education & Dave Smith John Heaven Environmental Partnership Society IN -le, '01 Liorisgaters Four Wheel Drive John Edgar 985-1495 Dave Hansen I Society . .- - Pam Hansen .- -5657 _il Wthéfi J Ministry of Forests - Chilliwack John Coles 702-5700 . Forest District . Pacific Northwest Motorcycle Errol'Borsky 298-5068 Deb Mabberly and David Lock Assn $I% p: dge Riders tviounaun Bike Club: Lome Smith 462-8877 Barry Lyster gS 19J Team Pagan Motorcycle Club Doug Young i - 21 EMIR . Ghttëi L UBC M lcom K app R search Michael Main • 463-8148 Forest . o Rób lonii4 j Western Canada Wilderness Joe Foy 683-8220 Gwen Bãrlee CU-M—Mittee . . . 4,411 628t4. _1 r 1*44 lnternationat'Mountain Bicycling Association John Gowans Concerned Citizens Don Rhodes Simon Challenger 462-1514 . . Thomas Haney High School Naomi Bollman . 467-5054 'Community Studies Erin Elliot 465-8666 March 12, 2003 27 En for Consultants Ltd. Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy Appendix 2 Blue Mountain Provincial Forest Resource Information Maps land 2 Reduced maps have been provided here. Map I of 2: Refer to http://www.enfor.com/PlaflS/maflac1emefltIbmPf/bIUmtfl pfor.pdf Map 2 of 2: Refer to http://www.enfor.Com/PiaflS/maflaQemefltIbmPf/bIUmtfl irsd.pdf March 12, 2003 28 En for Consultants Ltd. 4. • - --.•• -.--..- •,_,l Ki mv - • jfrf•.J. • • '4* :&-' ..,A• 71 - Iv, r-w - -ai - I - - I 91- f: Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy Appendix 3 Referral Respondents The following participants provided written comments on the draft Strategy during the review in February 2003. The internal review was intended to ensure that the consultants had correctly captured the interests/issues, goals, objectives, strategies and vision statement developed by the participants during the workshops held in October and December 2002, Comments were incorporated where they resulted in clarification. Participant Context of Comments 1. Blue Mountain Woodlot - Russ • Reminder to remove woodlots from study area. Jones, RPF • Remove incorrect roads. 2 Chilliwack Forest District - John • Clarification of Vision Statement. Coles Corporation of theDistrict of • Concern for implementation. Maple Ridge - Jim Charlebois, • Indicate how forest companies are required to incorporate goals. MURP • Need for coordination, management and funding. Develop a business plan. Dennis Kinsey, Resident • Opposed to reopening the gate to unlimited access. District of Mission - Kelly • Page 12, 1.7 - opposed to relocating road access to recreational Cameron users to TFL 26. • Page 22, 4.5.1 - change from Stave Lake to Alouette Lake. Don Rhodes, Resident • Regarding the access issue, recommendations are sound and feasible. • Information will generate awareness with the various users. • Complementary regarding the professionalism for handling their concerns. Greater Vancouver Regional • Document adequately proposes modem "best practices". Parks - Wendy DaDalt and Will McKenna • Nothing in the document that bothered us without greater detail and commitments. • Major concerns is too maintain recreation values and components in the-BMPF. • Desire to reference the GVRD goal to connect Kanaka Ck Regional Park with the BC Hydro Right of Way by a corridor of Crown land; interested in seeing the province turn over a corridor of land along the mainstem at least to the upper falls just north of the BC Hydro Right of Way. • Will take a commitment from all groups to implement the Strategy. • Role of the Adhoc User Group could be important. • Contact GVRD if any questions about WRAP or other Park Associations. March 12, 2003 31 En for Consultants Ltd. I Blue Mountain Provincial Forest - Forest Recreation Management Strategy Continued from previous page... Participant Context of Comments Hammond Stream Keepers - . Should state that Blue Mountain and Kariaka Creek Conservation Jim Bradshaw Group are not in agreement with any proposed logging activity on Blue Mountain. • State that the report is the opinion of the many user groups, the consultant and the MOF. • Vision statement relates to economic uses being a part of all's vision, which it is not • A number of unveriflable assertions about the process and the strategy. John Castiello • Not in agreement with the contents or the strategy approach. Lions Gaters Four Wheel Drive • Document generally looks fine. Society - Chris Donald and • Provided a number of minor text edits throughout the report. - John Edgar Pacific Northwest Motorcycle • Document looks very positive; hope it starts something wonderful Association - David Lock between our groups. • Compliments on the work completed. UBC Research Forest - • Wondered why the title was "Forest Recreation Management Michael Main, RPF Strategy" when there are a variety of forest management and conservation issues. • The Adhoc group will be the ones that will really put the document into action. :4 March 12, 2003 32 En for Consultants Ltd. Public Hearing - April 20, 2004 Speakers List Jurgen & Anne Eichmann Mary Jones Jay Mackenzie Ian Schroeder Nick Gaudiuso Christopher Steeves Karoline Steeves Dennis Steeves Gail Holland Doug Parke Judy Stangland B. Pemberton Greg Dalman Public Hearing - April 20, 2004 Speakers List Laurie Geschke Edward Jung Nigel Collett Alycia Hayes Ken Witala Alluglanica------------------- Bob Parsons Bruce Elliott Craig Jones 1 jA CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: Her Worship Mayor Kathy Morse DATE: April 21, 2004 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council SUBJECT: 2004-2008 Amending Financial Plan Bylaw No. 6225 - 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 2004 - 2008 Consolidated Financial Plan adopted by Council in December 2003 does not accurately represent the financial plans of the District at the present time. Revisions have been made to respond to Council direction and more accurately reflect the current financial condition. The new Financial Plan must be adopted prior to May 15, 2004 and prior to the adoption of the Tax Rates Bylaw. RECOMMENDATION: That the Maple Ridge Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6225 - 2004 be read a first, second and third time. DISCUSSION: Background Context: The District is currently authorized to make expenditures under the 2004 - 2008 Financial Plan Bylaw No.6183 - 2003 that was adopted December 9, 2003. However, this plan is currently outdated and does not represent the financial conditions at this time. The changes to the financial plan are minor and reflect changes in the revenue and expenditure areas that have occurred since December 2003. The major issues that have been addressed in this new financial plan are: • Real growth in the tax assessment base that is lower than previously projected • Increase in the Grant in Lieu of Taxes • Adjustments to various revenue projections • Increase in the Provincial Gov't. Unconditional Grant related to traffic fines • Increased fuel, energy, electrical, communications and insurance costs • Funding for the 232 nd St. bridge • Purchase of the courthouse • Utility Funds: - finalized revenue and expenditure projections • Capital Program: - changes to respond to Council and community priorities Desired Outcome: Adoption of the 2004 - 2008 Amending Financial Plan will enable the operating and capital programs to proceed as per the changed financial conditions and the appropriate rates and fee bylaws can be considered and adopted. Strategic Alignment: All departments prepared and presented a Business Plan, which then became the driver of their individual Financial Plans. These were achieved within the guidelines set in Business Planniizg Guidelines 7h Edition. This document is reviewed and amended annually in consultation with Council. I a Financial Plan/Business Plan Implications: The financial implications are represented in the schedule and appendices accompanying the bylaw. In summary, this bylaw will provide authorization for consolidated expenditures of $109M. However, $12.2M is for internal transfers to reserves. The following is an expenditure outline: • $41.6M - Capital Program • $50.7M - Operating Expenditures • $ 4.5M - Debt Service • $12.2M - Internal Reserve Transfers Therevenue sources to fund the expenditures are as follows: • $36.3M - Property Taxation, Grants in Lieu, Parcel Charges • $19.OM - Fees & Charges • $ 5.6M - Property Sales • $ 8.4M - Grants, Interest Income & Other • $15.7M - Developmen. Cost Charges • $24.OM - Internal Reserves & Surplus Since the 2004 - 2008 Financial Plan Bylaw No. 6183 - 2003 there have been revisions as a result of current inancia1 conditions or corporate direction compared to the forecasts and assumptions in November/December 2003. The final four years of the plan have been adjusted based on current financial information. Citizen/Customer Implications & Communications: The implication to homeowners, businesses and industry is that they will experience a municipal tax increase and increase of utility charges. The amount will vary depending on the class and assessed value but will approximate 4%. In 2004, service levels will remain on par with 2003. The replacement of the 232' St. bridge will improve safety, traffic flow and provide for easy expansion to 4 lanes in the future; street widening and improvements on 227th St. through a shared local improvement program will benefit business and cuslomers in that immediate area. An open invitation was extended to the public to attend any or all of the Business Plan presentations held during December 2003. Feedback was requested in person during question periods at the presentations, on the District's web site, and to the telephone "budget hotline." Under the current "Open Government" structure the public has continuous access to present commentary and ask questions with regard to the changes proposed. Policy Implications: None; all amendments-are as per statutory requirement and necessary to generate the revenues to provide municipal services within Maple Ridge. Alternatives: In the event this bylaw is not passed, the District is not authorized to make any expenditures other than those identified in Bylaw No. 6183 - 2003. This will require some operating changes to ensure that departments curtail or delay certain expenditures or programs to provide for the increasostsforenergy, fued safety_-_-----.- ----------- - t . CONCLUSIONS: The Five Year Financial Plan represents Council's vision and commitment to provide quality services to the residents of Maple Ridge. The Plan provides a forecast of the financial resources that are required to fund operations, programs and infrastructure for the current year and the following four years. As the Plan provides for a tax increase Council must adopt this Plan by by-law prior to adopting the Tax Rates By-law for 2004. Prepared by: Trevor Thompson, BBA Budget Officer Concurrence bobG.Sorba,CGA Director of Finance Approved by: ' aul Gill, BBA, CGA GM - Corp. & Financial Services L Concurrence: / J. L. (Jim) Rule / Chief Administrative Officer JGS/jgs -1 a CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6225-2004 A By-law respecting the 5-year Financial Plan for the years 2004 through 2008 WHEREAS pursuant to Sec'tiii 165 of the Co11 nunity Charter, Council for the District of Maple Ri :.ge has caused to be prepared a linancial Plan for the years 2004-2008; AND WHEREAS a public consultation process regarding the Financial Plan was undertaken by the District of Maple Ridge; NOW, THEREFORE, Council for the District of Maple Ridge in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS F':'LLowS: This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Amending Financial Plan By-law No. 6225-2004." Statement 1 attached hereto and made part of this by-law is hereby declared to be the Financial Plan of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge for the years 2004 through 2008. READ a first time this READ a second time this READ a third time this. RECONSIDERED and adopted the - YOR CLERK Attachments: Statement I 'S Attachment to Financial Plan Bylaw 6225-2004 Statement 1 Consolidated Financial Plan 2004-2008 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 REVENUES External Revenues Property Taxes $34,462,300 $36,655,186 $38,971,176 $41,056,549 $43,007,158 Parcel Charges $1,818,045 $1,858,820 $1,900,543 $1,935,734 $1,971,491 Fees & Charges $19,039,004 $19,552,881 $20,164,369 $20,860,832 $20,923,561 Interest j1 ,735,000 $1,725,000 $1,725,000 f 1,725,000 $1,725,000 Grants (Other Govts) $6,702,464 $2,685,579 $2,790,377 $2,247,197 $3,739,908 Properti Sales $5,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 D"Iopment Fees i.voper Cost Charges $15,370,137 $4,450,819 $3,989,385 $4,352,591 $4,031,344 Developer Specified Projects $63,507 $0 $0 $15,750 $25,984 Parkiand Acquisition $280,248 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Development Fees Total $15,713,892 $4,650,819 $4,189,385 $4,568,341 $4,257,328 Total External Revenues $85,020, 70ff $67,128,285 $69, 740,850 $72,393,653 $75,624,446 Internal Revenues Borrowing Proceeds $0 $0 $18,588,754 $10,743,877 $350,00C Transfer from Reserve Funds Land Reserve $858,342 $0 $0 $0 $0 Local Improvement Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Equipment Replacement Reserve $1,513,648 $1,967,750 $1,633,364 $591,828 $841,516 Sanitary Sewer Reserve $0 $487,565 $0 0 $0 Capital Works Reserve $4,847,609 $499,000 $2,309,500 $36,000 $310,000 Fire Department Capital Reserve $931,546 $881,110 $1,637,500 $250,000 $1,750,000 Transfer from Reserve Fund Total $8,151,145 $3,835,425 $5,580,364 $877,828 $2,901,516 Transfer from Own Reserves $10,442,159 $4,671,719 $4,074,297 $4,606,541 $4,602,888 Transfer from Surplus $5,376,456 $1,931,858 $0 $209,110 $0 Total Internal Revenues $23,969,760 $10,439,002 $28,243,415 $16,437,356 $7,854,404 TOTAL REVENUES $108,990,465 $77,567,287 $97,984,265 $88,831,009 $83,478,850 Expenditures External Expenditures -. Capital Expenditures $41,589,998 $14,997,259 $14,680,987 $10,572,818 $14,286,115 Principal Payments on Debt $1,697258 $1,597,224 $19,577,718 $11,514,845 $666,732 Interest Payments on Debt $2,822,313 $2,737,440 $2,369,376 $2,262,252 $2,261,965 Other Expenditures $50,708,200 $51,099,579 $53,182,328 $55,681,464 $56,651,508 To'aI External Expenditures $96,817,769 $70,431,502 $89,810,409 $80,031,379 $73,866,320 Internal Expenditures Transfer to Reserve Funds Capital Works Reserve $663,239 $683,767 j705,702 $725,606 $745,747 Equipment Replacement Reserve $1,585,196 $1,672,597 $1,768,902 $1,800,374 $1,833,705 Fire Dept. Capital Aquisition $728,466 $769,521 $813,392 $853,200 $893,482 Land Reserve $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Local Improvement Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sanitary Sewer Reserve $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 Total Transfer to Reserve Funds $3,076,902 $3,225,885 $3,387,997 $3,479,180 $3,572,935 Contribution to Surplus $0 $0 $34,728 $0 $731,095 Contribution to Own Reserves $9,095,794 $3,909,900 $4,751,131 $5,320,450 $5,308,500 Total Internal Expenditures $12,172,696 $7,135,785 $8,173,856 $8,799,630 $9,612,530 TOTAL EXPEN DITU RES $108,990,465 $77,567,287 $97,984,265 $88,831,009 $83,478,850 a - - 0=1 ~m~A~ MAPLE RIDGE Incorporated 12 September, 1874 The District of Maple Ridge Highlights . Financial Plan 2004 - 2008 • Tax Rates 2004 Utility Rates 2004 April 27, 2004 Financial Plan Highlights (assumptions and estimates used to forecast the 2004-2008 Financial Plan) Revenues • Revenues from all sources $109M. • Real Growth of the taxation base is 2.65% for 2004; previously projected @ 2.75%. • Annual Tax Increases for 2004 & 2005 of 4%; 2006-3.75%; 2007-3.5%; 3.0% - 2008. • 2004 Tax Increase: 4%; 3% - General Purposes; 1% - Town Centre Development Reserve. • The above two items (real growth and tax increase) to generate $2M in new revenue for 2004 and $10.5M over the five years covered by the plan. • Property Sales of $5.5M. These are primarily excess lands that do not currently generate any revenue and the proceeds will be transferred to municipal reserves for future use. • Fees, permits and charges adjusted to reflect current conditions. • The Province increased the Unconditional Grant related to traffic fines by $17K to $156K. • Utility rates have been increased by 4%; this will add an additional $350K for the Water Utility Fund and $300K for the Sewer Utility Fund. • Reserves and surplus are utilized as per policy to balance the Financial Plan. Expenditures • Expenditures and transfers to own reserves is $109M. • Inflation for 2005 - 2008 is built in for those goods and services that are impacted by inflation. • Provision has been made for salary & wage increase. • There were 8 RCMP Officers being added from 2003 - 2005 as part of the 2003 - 2007 Financial Plan. In 2004, the Financial Plan has been increased to provide for the additional officers. • Included in the Financial Plan is the annual cost for the Town Centre properties. • Increase for the purchase of water by 18.6% or $440K to $2.8M; increase for the Greater Vancouver Sewage & Storm Drainage Contract by $400K to $4.OM or 11.1% • The Capital Program averages $17M annually; $41.6M for 2004 which includes carry-fwds. from the prior years; the five year capital expenditure projection is $96.2M. This includes major expenditures for the 232nd St. bridge, Albion Industrial Park crossing, Albion Industrial Play Field development, fire hail & fire equipment, technology improvement and various improvements to roads, drainage and utility systems. • Debt service costs of $4.5M in 2004. • The Financial Plan provides for a full year of a Social Planning Services, the Official Community Plan Review and other planning studies cöntinüation of the "Safer C1e Pro grain" and support for customer service. 'Sc 2 Reserves $12 Debt Payments $4.5M Capital Program $41.6M Propem Tax Distribution 2004 Projected Revenue $109 Million Property Taxes & Parcel Charges $36.31VI Rsrvc T.24M Development Fee $1 5.7M rges $19M • • I, U tI U CAU I SO I U Other $8.41VI 2004 Projected Expenditures $109 Million Administration $0.91VI Fire Protection $2.1M Police Services $10.6M Corporate & Financial $5.1M Parks, Recreation & Gen. Govt Properties $12.1M Public Works & Development $10.41VI Sewer $4.91VI Water $4.61VI 3 Property Tax Distribution "Average Home" Assessed Value: $254,059 Levies/Charges: 2004 2003 $ Change Change General Purpose Tax & Debt $ 1,092 $ 1,049 $ 43 4.0 Library 61 59 2 4.0 Utilities 462 445 17 3.9 Recycling 50 49 1 2.0 $ 1,665 $ 1,602 $ 63 3.90% Other Agencies 123 116 7 6.0 School 857 842 15 1.8 Less: Home Owner Grant 470 470 0 0 Net: School Tax $ 387 $ 372 $ 15 4.1% Total Taxes $ 2,175 $ 2,090 $ 85 4.1% I 4 2004 Customer Payment Information Payments can be made by cash, cheque or debit card - credit cards are not accepted. • Taxes can be paid by: - mail (envelope provided) - through a financial institution (bank, credit union etc.) in person, by phone or the financial institution's internet service - drop box service • Taxes can be paid at: - Municipal Hall - Most financial institutions from anywhere in Canada If your financial institution is not a bank and will not accept payment, go to the nearest bank. The financial institution may charge a fee for the service. Payments can be deposited into a drop box located at the Municipal Hall • Due Date: Payment must made or post marked by the post office by mid night of July 02, 2004 to avoid a penalty of 5%; a second penalty of 5% will be applied on Sept. 03, 2004. • Home Owner Grant The Home Owner Grant application form must be completed, signed and submitted before the due date to avoid a penalty - there are no exceptions. Homeowners should submit the completed Home Owner Grant Application even if they are not paying their property taxes or if they have paid their taxes by telephone or internet at a financial institutions or are enrolled in the municipal TIPS (pre-authorized payment plan); there are no exceptions. The threshold for calculating the home owner grant has been increased to $585,000 from $525,000. The grant is eliminated or home owner's with a home assessed at more than $632,000. For home owner's who are entitled for the additional home owner grant, the grant is eliminated at $659,000. The basic grant is $470 while the additional grant is $275 (for a combined total of $745). Taxation Facts 4.00% Tax Increase • 3.00% for general purposes • 1.00% for the Town Centre Development Reserve • 3.9% or $63 net increase for average home for Municipal controlled levies. Tax Shift • 1/2 % from Major and Light Industry Class to Residential Class Utility Rates • Water user flat rate increase of $9.20 to $239.20 from $230.00 • Sewer user flat rate increase of $6.70 to $174.20 from $167.50 • Meter rate adjusted to reflect % increase in the flat rate Recycling Rates • $.48 increase to the general recycling (depot) rate to $24.24 • $.48 increase to curbside collection is $24.92 Apartments and multi-family units will experience a blended increase to $24.74 Collections for Other Governments and Agencies • Average net increase is $22 after taking into account the credit for the Provincial Homeowner Grant Library • As a result of the increased budget approved by the Fraser Valley Regional Library Board and increased service in the Maple Ridge Branch, the levy increases by $2.38 for the average home. Taxes are due June 30, 2004 • First 5 % penalty date is July 03, 2004 • Second 5% penalty date is Sept. 03, 2004 Sample Tax Properties 2004 Assessed Value: 2003 Assessed Value: Percentage Change: Municipal Council Levies: Agency Levies: Agency Levies: Other Agency Levies: 334,000 299,000 11.71% General Purpose & Debt Levy Library Utilities Recycling Levies Other Agency Levies School Tax Less: Home Owner's Grant Total Taxes 309,000 285,000 8.42% General Purpose & Debt Levy Library Utilities Recycling Levies Other Agency Levies School Tax Less: Home Owners Grant Total Taxes 292,200 240,700 2 1.40% General Purpose & Debt Levy Library Utilities Recycling Levies Other Agency Levies School Tax Less: Home Owners Grant Total Taxes 2004 2003 Change 5 1.436 S 1,369 5 67 4.9% 80 77 3 3.9°Y 239 230 9 79 3.9% 4.7% 1,755 1,676 25 24 1 4.2% 162 152 10 6.6% 1,127 1,098 29 2.6% 470 470 - 29 0.0% 4.6% 657 628 S 2,599 S 2.480 119 4.8% 2004 2003 Change % S 1,328 S 1,305 S 23 1.8% 74 73 1 . 1.4% 465 448 17 41 3.8% 2.2% 1,867 1,826 50 49 1 2.0% 150 145 5 3.4% 1,042 1,047 (5) -0.5% 470 470 - (5) 0.0% -0.9% 572 577 S 2,639 S 2.597 42 1.6% 2004 2003 Change % S 1,256 S 1,102 $ 154 14.0% 70 62 8 12.9% - - - 162 0.0% 13.9% 1,326 1,164 50 49 1 2.0% 142 122 20 16.4% 986 884 102 11.5% 470 470 - 102 24.6% 516 414 S 2.034 S 1,749 285 16.3% le 2 - Albion I Kanak Assessed Value: Assessed Value: ntage Change: ipal Council Levies Samole 3 - Whonnock 2004 Assessed Value: 2003 Assessed Value: Percentage Change: Municipal Council Levies 7 le 4 - Central Maple Assessed Value: Assessed Value: ntage Change: ipal Council Levies: Agency Levies Other Agency Levies: Agency Levies: 237,100 221,200 7.19% General Purpose & Debt Levy Library Utilities Recycling Levies Other Agency Levies School Tax Less: Home Owners Grant Total Taxes 147,700 142,500 3.65% General Purpose & Debt Levy Library Utilities Recycling Levies Other Agency Levies School Tax Less: Home Owner's Grant Total Taxes 349,000 342,000 2.05% General Purpose & Debt Levy Library Utilities Recycling Levies Other Agency Levies School Tax Less: Home Owner's Grant Total Taxes % S 1,019 S 1,013 S 6 0.6% 57 57 - 0.0% 461 444 17 23 3.8% 1.5% 1,537 1,514 50 49 1 2.0% 115 112 3 2.7% 800 812 (12) -1.5% 470 470 - (12) 0.0% -3.5% 330 342 S 2,032 $ 2,017 15 0.7% I 2004 I 2003 I Chanee I % S 635 S 653 S (18) -2.8% 36 37 (1) -2.7% 456 440 16 (3) 3.6% -0.3% 1,127 1,130 25 25 - 0.0% 72 72 - 0.0% 498 523 (25) 4.8% 470 470 - (25) 0.0% -47.2% 28 53 $ 1,252 $ 1,280 (28) -2.2% S 1,500 S 1,566 $ (66) 4.2% 84 88 -4.5% 467 451 16 (54) 3.5% -2.6% 2,051 2,105 50 49 1 2.0% 169 174 -2.9% 1,177 1,256 (79) -6.3% 470 470 - (79) 0.0% -10.1% 707 786 S 2,977 S 3,114 (137) Samnle 5 - Central Maple 2004 Assessed Value: 2003 Assessed Value: Percentage Change: Municipal Council Levies: Sample 6 - West Maple Ri 2004 Assessed Value: 2003 Assessed Value: Percentage Change: Municipal Council Levies: 8 le 7 - Lower Hammo Assessed Value: Assessed Value: ntage Change: icipal Council Levies: Agency Levies: Samnle 8 - Upper Hammoi 2004 Assessed Value: 2003 Assessed Value: Percentage Change: Municipal Council Levies: Agency Levies: Sample 9 - Maple Ridge A 2004 Assessed Value: 2003 Assessed Value: Percentage Change: Municipal Council Levies: Agency Levies: 162,400 132,500 22.57% General Purpose & Debt Levy Library Utilities Recycling Levies Other Agency Levies School Tax Less: Home Owner's Grant Total Taxes 232,900 206,000 13.06% General Purpose & Debt Levy Library Utilities Recycling Levies Other Agency Levies School Tax Less: Home Owner's Grant Total Taxes 254,059 229,213 10.84% General Purpose & Debt Levy Library Utilities Recycling Levies Other Agency Levies School Tax Less: Home Owner's Grant Total Taxes 2004 2003 Change % $ 698 $ 607 $ 91 15.0% 39 34 5 14.7% 457 440 17 113 3.9% 10.5% 1,194 1,081 50 49 1 2.0% 79 67 12 17.9% 548 487 61 12.5% 470 470 - 61 0.0% 358.8% 78 17 $ 1,401 S 1,214 187 15.4% 2004 2003 Change % $ 1,001 $ 943 $ 58 6.2% 56 53 3 5.7% 461 444 17 78 3.&% 54%! 1,518 1,440 50 49 1 2.0% 113 105 8 7.6% 786 757 29 3.8% 470 470 - 29 0.0% 10.1% 316 287 $ 1,997 $ 1,881 116 6.2% S 1,092 S 1,050 $ 42 4.0% 61 59 2 34% 462 445 17 61 3.8% 3.9% 1,615 1,554 50 49 1 2.0% 123 116 7 6.0%! 857 842 15 1.8% 470 470 - 15 0.00/0 4.0% 387 372 $ 2,175 $ 2,091 84 4.0% 2004 -2OO&Financial Plan Key Pónts -. • Capital -Work In Progress • Operating Commitments • Format Change (as per Community Chafl r)r • Capital Program Revisions • Other Budget Changes - Hydro, Insurance, Union & Other Contracts, —Qr-aits1-Qrowth-in-RropePyTaBase --------. 1 Items On The Horizon -Financiát Plan • Town Centre Development Seftie - Change from rent payments to loan • Fire Department Master Plan - Incorporate implementation intc 'inancia1 F within current taxation increase plojections. Assessments • $5.3B to $6.IB an increase of $7.22M • 13.5% increase - • Breakdown residential property class: - Market change $524M 10.8% —Growth(new) $179M 3.7% Total $703M 2 Average COmposite Residential Property AssessmQQt Change 2004 Assessment $254, 2003 Assessment $229,21 Property Taes,,-Municipal 2003 2004 Change in Ref. #. Address Assessment Assessment '3a.AssessmeiI L 1 Silver Valley $ 299,000 $ 334.000 $6 ,00 2 Albion/Kanalta $ 285.000 $ 309,000 $ "Z4 8.4% 3 Whonnock S 240,700 $ 292,200 S 5 4 Central MR $ 221,200 $ 237.100 $ 15, $ 32,60 5 Central MR $ 237,000 $ 269,600 6 Central MR - strata $ 142,500 $ 147,700 $ 5,200 7 West MR $ 342,000 $ 349,000 8 Lower Hammond $ 132,500 $ 162,400 $ 29,900 1 S Upper Hammond $ 206,000 $ 232.900 $ 26,900 Total $2,105,900 $2,333,900 $228,000 10 Property Taxes.-Municipal c 2003 004 -Change in Ref.#. Address MunTaxes unTaxes Taxes — - Silver Valley $ 1,446 1,5l6 $1 70 4.9% - — Albion/Kanaka $ 1.378 1.402 $24' 1.8% — - Whonnock $ 1.164 1326 $162. irS% 4 Central MR $ 1,070 1.076 $O.6% — Central MR $ 1,146 1,224 $76. 68% - — Central MR - strata $ 689 670 $ () -2% - — WesIMR $ 1.654 1,584 (7 ) ' — Lower Hammond $ 641 737 $96 15O% — Upper Hammond $ 996 1057 $ 61 Total $ 10,183 $ 10,593 $410 4.0% 3 Rates Sewértitility 2004 Rates increase of 4% - Flat rate to $174.20 - Equivalent increase in metered rates WatérUiIity 2004 Rates increase of 4% - Flat rate to $239.20 - - Equivalent increase in metered rates - .5 'I * ing Property Tax Comparison Municipal Levies: 2004 200 Ch % (jeneni Pmpou & DLny $1,091.97 S I,049.S1 2.40 4.0% Libutry S 61.15 S 50.77 4.0% thiiuie $ 462.02 $ 444.79 $ ReuyclmgLviu LiJ4 $ 49.16 $1,665.20 S 1,602.29 $ 62. Other Agency Levi Oth Agency L.evie, S 123.29 S 116.30 S 6.99 SchoolTux S 956.99 S 841.03 S 15.16 I Lun: Houn o—es Gro 470.00 S 470.00 $ - 0. $ 506.99 5 371.93 S 15.16 4.1 1661 bonn 56 S 2,090.42 505.14 4.1 Items On The Horizon - Property Tas • Translink (Other Agencys LeZy.) - Planned increase in property taxes 2005 2006 of approximately $60 per household each '3'4 at Significant capital investment plannedb the Regional District will impact the utilities - Utilities review in progress