The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutADP 2021-06-16 Agenda.pdf City of Maple Ridge Advisory Design Panel AGENDA Wednesday, June 16, 2021 at 4:00 pm Held Virtually Via Zoom Teleconference Join the meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone https://mapleridge-ca.zoom.us/j/96838087050?pwd=TnQ0VGFwZUVBVzVsZkwybXllRFJ2UT09 Or join the meeting using your phone Dial: 1-778-907-2071 Meeting ID: 968 3808 7050 Password: 590868 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES – May 19, 2021 4. NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS 5. PROJECTS 5.1 Development Permit No: 2020-309-DP 4:05 PM Applicant: Joe Minten Architect AIBC | AAA | MRAIC Project Architect: JM Architecture Inc. Project Landscape Architect: DVS Duncan Landscape Architect Proposal: Multi- storey (7) residential development Location: 12297 222 St. | 22175, 22185 123 Ave Maple Ridge, BC File Manager: Wendy Cooper M.Sc. MCIP RPP Planner 6. QUESTION PERIOD 7. ADJOURNMENT Next Meeting: July 21, 2021 Agenda Items Submission Deadline: June 16, 2021 QUESTION PERIOD Question Period provides the public with the opportunity to ask questions or make comments on subjects that are of concern to them. Each person will be given 2 minutes to speak. Up to ten minutes in total is allotted for Question Period. /sc mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge Advisory Design Panel MEETING MINUTES The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Maple Ridge Advisory Design Panel (ADP) held via Zoom teleconference on Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 4:00 pm. PANEL MEMBERS PRESENT Stephen Heller, Chair Landscape Architect BCSLA Meredith Mitchell, Vice Chair Landscape Architect BCSLA Steven Bartok Architect AIBC Emily Kearns Architect AIBC Andrea Scott Architect AIBC STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Wendy Cooper Staff Liaison, Planner 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA R/2021-025 It was moved and seconded That the agenda for the May 19, 2021 Advisory Design Panel meeting be approved as circulated. CARRIED 3.ADOPTION OF MINUTES R/2021-026 It was moved and seconded That the minutes for the May 12, 2021 Special Advisory Design Panel meeting be adopted as circulated. CARRIED 4.NEW AND UNFINISHED BUSINESS 5.PROJECTS At this time, Meredith Mitchell recused herself from item 5.1 due to conflict of interest. 5.1 Development Permit No: 2019-268-RZ 22340 & 22328 St. Anne Avenue and 11654 & 11664 223 Street The Chair welcomed the project team to the meeting and introduced the members of the ADP. The Staff Liaison provided a brief overview of a mixed use commercial and apartment building consisting of approximately 568 m2 of space at the ground level and 111 apartment units. The project team presented the development plans and answered questions from the Panel. R/2021-027 It was moved and seconded That the Advisory Design Panel has reviewed application No. 2019-268-RZ and recommends the following concerns be addressed and digital versions of revised drawings and memo be submitted to Advisory Design Panel Minutes May 19, 2021 Page 2 of 3 Planning staff; and further that Planning staff forward this on to the Advisory Design Panel for information. Comments from the Panel included: Architectural Comments: ·Consider lowering main floor elevation for a more engaged commercial interface at St. Anne Avenue; ·Considering adding an indoor amenity space to incorporate a water closet for the roof top deck if height allows; ·Consider providing a horizontal element to break up the south elevation; ·Providing signage information including type and size to integrate with the architecture aesthetic. Landscape Comments: ·Add cross sections to plans as off-site design evolves; ·Consider enhancing the lobby entrances through paving and site furniture; ·Considering adding west access to the ground level court yard, as well as gate from the adjacent patios; ·Consider a shade structure or trellis on the roof top. CARRIED Meredith Mitchell did not vote At this time, Meredith Mitchell recused herself from item 5.2 due to conflict of interest. 5.2 Development Permit No:2017-485-DP 10640 248 Street The Chair welcomed the project team to the meeting and introduced the members of the ADP. The Staff Liaison provided a brief overview of the proposed 61 unit townhouse development in the Albion neighbourhood. The project team presented the development plans and answered questions from the Panel. R/2021-028 It was moved and seconded That the Advisory Design Panel has reviewed application No. 2017-485-DP and recommends the application be supported and the following concerns be addressed as the design develops and submitted to Planning staff for follow-up: Comments from the Panel included: Architectural Comments: ·Provide alternative colours/materials schemes with lighter pallet and additional variety. Consider differentiate each row; ·Provide community identity feature; ·Remove visitor parking space at front entrance beside block nine (9); ·Provide additional articulation on the west side of units facing 106th Avenue (Block 1). Landscape Comments: ·Consider adding trees along interior roads. CARRIED Meredith Mitchell did not vote Advisory Design Panel Minutes May 19, 2021 Page 3 of 3 Note: Meredith Mitchell left at 5:30 pm 6.QUESTION PERIOD -NIL 7.CORRESPONDENCE -NIL 8.ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6.00 p.m. The next regular meeting of the Advisory Design Panel will be held on Wednesday, June 16, 2021. Stephen Heller, Chair /wc Page 1 of 4 City of Maple Ridge TO: Advisory Design Panel MEETING DATE: May 31, 2021 FILE NO: 2020-309-DP SUBJECT: 12297 222 Street, 22175 and 22185 123 Avenue PURPOSE: An Advisory Design Panel (the “ADP”) submission has been received for the above cited application and properties to permit the construction of a 106 with apartment building with a 269.41m2 daycare facility. This site is subject to being re-zoned to RM-4 (Medium Density Townhouse Residential). The rezoning application being processed in conjunction with this proposal was given First Reading by Council on September 17, 2019. This rezoning application is accompanied by an Official Community Plan (OCP) amendment to adjust the conservation boundary around watercourse T2 and amend the Urban Residential designation to include the RM-4 (Medium Density Townhouse Residential) zone on site specific basis. The development permit application made to the City is subject to Section 8.7 Multi-Family Development Permit. BACKGROUND: Applicant: JM Architecture Joseph M Minton Legal Description: Lot 5, D.L. 396, Plan NWP830; Lot 9, D.L.: 396, Plan: NWP15728 and Lot: 10, D.L.: 396, Plan: NWP15728 OCP: Existing: Conservation, Urban Residential Proposed: Urban Residential and conservation Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Proposed: RM-4 (Medium Density Townhouse Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Residential Zone: RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation South: Use: Residential Zone: RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Multi-Family Zone: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Designation: Low-Rise Apartment West: Use: Residential Zone: RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation l~W mapleridge.ca Page 2 of 4 Existing Use of Properties: Residential Proposed Use of Properties: Multi-Family purpose built rental Site Area: 0.9 ha (2.23 acres) Access: 123 Avenue Servicing requirement: Urban Standard DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA: The development permit application made to the City prompting this submission to the ADP is subject to the Key Guidelines and the Design Guidelines of Section 8.7 Multi-Family Development Permit. Key Guidelines: The following is a brief description and assessment of the proposal’s compliance with the applicable Key Development Permit Guidelines: New development into established areas should respect private spaces, and incorporate local neighbourhood elements in building form, height, architectural features and massing. The area is an area in transition through redevelopment. Transitional development should be used to bridge areas of low and high densities, through means such as stepped building heights, or low rise ground oriented housing located to the periphery of higher density developments. The proposed development is located on a site that requires the building to be built apart from the surrounding housing forms due to the natural features of the site. Large scale developments should be clustered and given architectural separation to foster a sense of community, and improve visual attractiveness. The proposed development is situated apart from the existing housing forms in the area. Pedestrian circulation should be encouraged with attractive streetscapes attained through landscaping, architectural details, appropriate lighting and by directing parking underground where possible or away from public view through screened parking structures or surface parking located to the rear of the property. The proposal incorporated underground parking and the landscaping of the site is to encourage pedestrian activity. The applicant has provided a description on how proposed development fulfills the Key Guideline concepts which is attached in Appendix E to this memo. Design Guidelines: The Design Guidelines and a full explanation of how the project complies with them or the reasons why they are not applicable are attached in Appendix E to this memo. Page 3 of 4 PLANNING COMMENTS: 1. Proposal: The application is to rezone the subject properties located at 12297 222 Street, 22175 and 22185 123 Avenue from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone to RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential District) zone with site specific text amendments. The proposal is a multi-family housing development which is 7 storeys (32m high) consisting of 106 residential units . These residential units will be a mixture of affordable purpose built units for adults living with Autism and market housing. The development includes a 36 children daycare facility with an outdoor playground. 2. Context: The site is influenced by the watercourse T2 and associated slopes that runs along the west and east side of the property. There is a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees on the site. The site is constraint by slopes and environmental features. The site is located outside of the Town Centre plan area. The neighbourhood is a mixture of single-family homes; townhouses and low-rise apartment buildings. The area is in transition through redevelopment. 3. OCP and Zoning Compliance: 4. The subject site is designated Urban Residential and Conservation. The Conservation designation of the subject site is being adjusted to reflect ground-truthing. The Urban Designation is being amended to include the RM-4 (Medium Density Townhouse Residential) zone on a site specfic basis. The subject site is being rezoned to RM-4 (Medium Density Townhouse Residential) and Development Data Sheet (Appendix F) analyses the compliance of the project with the applicable zone regulations. The proposal has a density (Floor Space Ratio) of 2.75. The development will be requiring a site specific text amendment to the RM-4 (Medium Density Townhouse Residential) for desnity as well as siting. 5. Parking and bicycle storage: The required parking for the proposed use is analyzed in the Development Data Sheet (Appendix F) The proposal will require variances to the parking requirements. Issues requiring comments from ADP: The proposed development is a newer form of development into the area. The massing and expression of the building will influence the existing area. Can the ADP provide comments on these aspects as well as additional aspects that the panel consider important. Page 4 of 4 CONCLUSION: The proposed development is located in an area of redevelopment and the subject property is influenced by natural features that limit the developable area. The Planning Department requests that the Advisory Design Panel provide comments on the development proposal. Wendy Cooper ______________________________________________ Prepared by: Wendy Cooper Planner The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A Subject map Appendix B Explanatory letter from Architect Appendix C ADP Submission Form Appendix C ADP Applicant Checklist (signed by Architect) Appendix D Development Data Sheet (signed by Architect) Appendix E DP Area Guidelines Checklist Appendix F Architectural and Landscaping Plans DATE: Sep 21, 2020FILE: 2019-255-RZ 12297 222 STREET, 22175/85 123 AVENUEPID'S; 011-921-935, 010-122-818 & 010-122-885 City of PittMeadows District ofLangley Di s t r i c t o f M i s s i o n FRASER R. ^PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PROPERTIES Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2018´ Scale: 1:2,500 BY: PC 124 AVE map eridge.ca DA T E : S e p 2 1 , 2 0 2 0 FI L E : 2 0 1 9 - 2 5 5 - R Z 12 2 9 7 2 2 2 S T R E E T , 2 2 1 7 5 / 8 5 1 2 3 A V E N U E PI D ' S ; 0 1 1 - 9 2 1 - 9 3 5 , 0 1 0 - 1 2 2 - 8 1 8 & 0 1 0 - 1 2 2 - 8 8 5 PL A N N I N G D E P A R T M E N T SU B J E C T P R O P E R T I E S ´Sc a l e : 1 : 2 , 5 0 0 BY : P C 12 4 A V E Le g e n d St r e a m Di t c h C e n t r e l i n e In d e f i n i t e C r e e k Ri v e r C e n t r e l i n e 3 D) "CS ci" :::::!. Q. a: ■ (") D) ~ ;I 22060 22102 22110 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0> 22160/90 22262 ;;; "' ~ m 22065 I~ ~ ~ 221 ST. ---, 22062 11~ 122061 "' "' "' ,,. § 0> ,_, __ 22-08-8----'I i~ !122011 I I ~I 22010 I () )> ~ 55 ~I ~I ~I ~ w <o 5 <o 22075 22081 221 ST. z C I \ 22097 ~ () w 22080 I <o ;s 22085 co () ;u m 22090 I en 22095 22099 22104 22104 I 22101 I I .-~ ~ 1~ 1~ 22124 22116 I ~ ~ ~ w ~ w <o w 0, w 0, <o " 22122 I GRAY ST. 2/---1-I --~ ~I~ ~ w <o "' ~I ~I ~I ~I ~ 122160 I f} DELCREST ST, ~ I~ I~ I~ I 22190 I ~ <o ·1-1 ~ I ~ I l e_______,___~~-~~-'--- 22213 22229 22255 22277 22295 222 ST. ~ "' w C ~ "' w co 22230 ~ "' 0, 0, ;;; w )> iii I~ • "' 0, co ~ ~ C 22275 I~ I~ ~ m 22165 22175 22185 ~ "' <o 0, ~ "' <o ,,. .~ _, _,,,. L...---""-- 8 ~ "' C ri Ii lg I~ 1~ I HILLSIDE ST. I~ I~ ~ 22174 ~· ' ' "'" 22178 22182 JI:, I I~ -I~ ~ 22186 ~ 22206 22228 22238 ·-------··1~ I~-22262 22270 -- 22280 I 22059 22051 22069 2206 22075 2207( 22081 2207, 22087 2208 22093 2209 22099 2209 22105 221 ~ ,,. "' I L 221 0, GRAY ST. ~ ~ ,,. ,,. "' ,,. C C 221 22123 22133 22141 22149 I~ 22 22157 22165 ~ ~22171~ I~ I~ Ii ~ I~ I~ I~ I~ 122279 -- ~ "'I-,,. ... "' "',,. ;;; I ~ <o ,,. -I>, ~ m 7 ~ I~ ,,. ~-ADP Submission Checkl ist mapleridge.ca Application No. _____________ File Manager ___________ _ This checklist is being provided to you by your File Manager, to assist in preparing the materials for submission to the Advisory Design Panel (ADP). Please refer to the ADP Submission Form and the ADP Requirements Brochure for submission requirements in terms of explanatory letters, plans, supporting information and specifications on size and numbers of copies to be submitted. Address your questions to the File Manager or the Planning Liaison to the ADP. CertifiCI tion of Complete ADP Submission: I I A ; Archlte ~ion: , Projt ct:!nijtscap~ ru.1 tect's Certification: ~ I 11 ~11>~ I--~ / , /k~ 31May 2021 Sign,re -Date Signat re Date tv-1~~ Av-d/\,t~t Print name ..J 06 Print name Donald V. S. Duncan BCSLA I CSLA l...J#? ,. \ J a "'It ,t"f7_ I•, •••• #'-,-.,,. '..... --Required Submission Materials (FIie Manapr to Provided Indicate If reaulred) ,,. A. ADP Submission Form (Submitted and signed by Architect) g a' 8. Covering Letter including explanations about: ~ 1. Project description/analysis (Detailed information Required) ~ ~ 2. Architectural and Landscaping Design rationale ~ ~ (Detailed information Required) 3. Statement in brief about the following: a. DP Key Concepts Compliance uY □ b. DP Guideline Compliance Er' □ c. Stormwater management strategy with emphasis on Tier A □ □ requirements integrated into landscaping plans d. Public Art/ Amenities, etc. □ □ e. Sustainability practices □ □ f. Other □ □ C. Site and Neighbourhood Context 1. Context Review -Context Plan with existing/proposed buildings and trees, vegetation, roads, existing/ proposed (il/ a( grading, and other major features within the site, on the abutting properties, the public realm and along the road allowances/ lanes. 2. Photographs of site and surrounding sites. □ □ D. Develo~ment Permit Area Checklist ~ (Note: The Architect is responsible to describe how the project complies with □ each guidelines, or if not applicable, a description of why not applicable. Please use fillable forms on line.) City of Maple Ridge ADP Submission Checklist (Page 2) E. Architectural Plans (Site and Bulfding{s}l: 1. Site Plan and layout liY [El" 2. Site sections [!I"' ur 3. Streetscape elevation □ □ 4. Streetscape elevations with landscaping and boulevard trees □ □ superimposed 5. Shadow analysis □ □ 6. Lighting analysis (on building and on site) □ □ 7. Floor Plans for all levels, including underground and roof tops [iJ/ ur . 8. Waste collection /recycling (inside of buildings) [il/ 1¥. 9. Storage, including bicycle storage (inside and outside) ~ ~~ 10. Building elevation (all sides) liY ~ 11. Signage (attached to building and free standing) □ □~ 12. Colours and materials ~ ~ 13. Material board [il/4 □ , 14. Building sections ~ U}" / 15. 3D renderings of site, building(s) and associated landscaping ~ F. LandSC!l!Rl!}g Plans: 1. Landscaping plan and layout with specifications and planting lir' details 2. Storm water management works focused on Tier A □ □ requirements integrated into landscaping plan with details . 3. Landscaping details, including public art, signage, lighting, play Ii]/' Ill and other amenity areas, fences, retaining walls, 4. Waste collection /Recycling (exterior areas/structures) □ □., 5. Details for pedestrian amenity and furniture features provided ~ llf ~ 6. Details for hard surfacing areas/ patterns (!' 7. Tree retention and management plan [iJ/ □ 8. Site sections for lot grading, drainage, landscaping, retaining □ □ walls and relationship to adjacent grades/ City roads/ lanes 9. Pedestrian, bicycle, equestrian path interconnections □ □ G. Green Building/Sustalnabllitv initiatives □ □ H. Engineering-related Information: 1. Site grading plans □ □ I. Other □ □ □ □ □ □ Rev. March 2018 The City schedule making y ADP subm ADP thro Applicati Name of File num Address Current Z Seeking t Architect Submissi Architect Landscap Other Pro Note.: Th developm taken fro bulletin, Major per th build Group A (Pa Group B (Pa Group C Res Group D & E Group F (F1 Adv of Maple Rid es for submis your submiss mission pack ough your Fil ion Informa Applicant ber of site Zone to appear be t Informatio on will be p t pe Architect ofessional (S he Architects ments to the om AIBC Bull click here. Occupancy he current ing codes art 3) art 3) sidential E : Part 3) isory Des dge Advisory ssion deadlin sion, contact kage for you le Manager w tion: _________ _________ _________ _________ efore the AD on: resented to _________ _________ State Name s are require e ADP that a letin 31 Build Public Assem Hospital, San Home for the Aged Institutional Hotel or sim Commercial Industrial sign Pane y Design Pan ne dates and t your File M ur project. Fo well in adva __________ __________ __________ ___ Propose DP on this da ADP by: __________ __________ & Role) ____ ed to prepar re in the Ma dings Requir Use mbly natorium, or e ilar occupancy el Submis nel (ADP) me d for the min Manager to e orward your nce of the d ___________ _____ ___________ ed Zone ____ ate ________ ___________ ___________ __________ re plans and ajor Occupan ring the Serv Type services − any o exce − any b exce − all sc − any b capa − any b − any b − any b − any b − any b ssion Req eets monthly nimum subm establish wh r complete s deadline date __________ __________ __________ __________ ________ _______ ___________ to attend a ncy categori vices of an A es of Building or s of an architect one‐storey build eeding 9 m or gro building of more eeding 235 m²; a chools, any size building (exclud acity exceeding 1 building with gro building contain building contain building with gro building with gro uest Form y.Refer to t mission requ at constitute ubmission p e. __ __ __ __ __________ nd to presen es cited in th Architect. Fo r Parts of Buildin t under section 6 Act. ding with an uns oss area exceed e than one store and ing veterinary h 12 beds oss area exceed ning 5 or more d ning 11 or more g oss area exceed oss area exceed m he attached irements. Be es a complet package for t ____ nt all he Table bel r the entire ng requiring the 60 of the Archit supported span ing 275 m²; ey with gross are ospital) with a ing 470 m² welling units guest rooms ing 470 m² ing 470 m² efore te the ow e ects ea I ~--~ . ' .. mapleridge.ca CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL 2019 APPLICANT SCHEDULE Meeting Date Applicant Deadline January 16, 2019 December 17, 2018 February 20, 2019 January 28, 2019 March 20, 2019 February 25, 2019 April 17, 2019 March 25, 2019 May 15, 2019 April 18, 2019 June 19, 2019 May 27, 2019 July 17, 2019 June 24, 2019 NO AUGUST MEETING September 18, 2019 August 26, 2019 October 16, 2019 September 23, 2019 November 20, 2019 October 28, 2019 NO DECEMBER MEETING ; ~-DEVELOPMENT DATA SHEET mapleridge.ca Existing /Proposed Zone JZSl/t-17 Date Prepared '?-I y{ fr{ ~ z.l Required Development Data Minimum Required or Maximum Allowed LOT AREA* (in square metres) Gross Total lo, 0'?4-, "&~ Less Road Widening/ Truncations ' ~IA Less Park tJ /A Net Total ~D , D ;4. </? • LOT COVERAGE (in % of net lot area') I ~~ h'V\ ljlvt,"h lA-J),.'-rtA_ Total Site Coverage SETBACKS (in metres) Front 1C:w1J1l\ 1-~ Rear -Ll~ml-\ 7.,i, Side #1 (N,S,E, orlwJ tJE'qf 1.~ Side #2 (N,S,E, or W) ~M"l 1-'7 >i.de #~ (N,..s,..E-ef W)-tJ/A . SETBACKS -Underground Structures (in metres) , ~~~6t\v Front -?-m.Y'fA I Rear Llgf:fl-\ I Side #1 (N,S,E, or W) Wt4,T ) ,..,~ Side #2 (N,S,E, or W) € A--,., lo~ Side#~ ,~1,..s, i;; e~ BUILDING HEIGHT (in metres/storeys) Principal ti..l /A Accessory ... ~fA NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS Bachelor >Ji A One Bedroom n.'t 'A Two Bedroom ...,. j ,,. Three Bedroom+ ,J-1A Total GROSS FLOOR AREA (in square metres) Residential i.J A Retail Commercial Office Commercial Other Commercial (Type ) Institutional Industrial TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA • If the development site consists of more than one lot, lot dimensions pertain to the entire site. Proposed (Complies or state variance needed) l 32 , I Required Development Data Minimum Required or Maximum Allowed Proposed (Complies or variance needed?) DENSITY 0 ~ ~f"'~ Wit/ . ~IA-.. # of units/ha (gross) -'1 rrl ~ l. t>o ? UA. ~ob/l.k. ~ ~~t-?lli!~ # of units/ha (net} o:;,1it Lka "2~ I l-Y.f "'~) L I( Gross Floor Area l01~~ -. ,IC. Floor Space Ratio (net)""-~~-~,, L-:..v·~ 1.,1'7 \(, '.at e"Jf'(7 ' • .,,,r;.. . AMENITY SPACE (area in square metres) Common Activity Area t t,Y17l'0~<:7 Useable Open Space PARKING (number of spaces) Residential and Multi-Residential Uses l"t> lDO Multi-Residential Town Centre (Bach Units) Multi-Residential Town Centre (1 Bdr Units) Multi-Residential Town Centre (Added Bdr) Commercial Uses Educational & Assembly Uses Institutional Use Industrial Use Business Park Uses Comprehensive Other Number of spaces for visitors . ~ V7 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES Number of total for disabled L \ Number of total (and %) small cars .'II 1.0 % ~ Number of total (and %) tandem spaces 0 0 % 'O TOTAL OFF STREET LOADING SPACE(S) ~\4 BICYCLE PARKING (number of spaces) Short Term Bicycle Parking 7?D ?~· Long Term Bicycle Parking Z-7 z::r OTHER-state YES or NO for each. If YES describe on separate sheet. Heritage Site I I Tree Survey/Assessment Provided •• I Watercourse/Steep Slopes I I Covenants, Stat ROW & Easements • I I hereby certify that all the above information is true and correct. I acknowledge that a~y error or omissions are the sole responsibility of the undersigned a11,d not t] e ~evelo ment and Environmental Services Department. ( . Prepared by: Joe, l:1.f tA±:t-1/\ ·, yrini,Name ld (Pleas print form and sign above) Av-e~-• 1l-t,1. A,~ ~~ll-- NorE: To be prepared by an Architect for AD Submi sion or by an owner/agent (applicant) for Development Application.