HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-03-08 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfCouncil Meeting Agenda Tuesday, March 8, 2022 Page 2 of 5 701.1 Development Agreements Committee February 23, 2022 March 2, 2022 701.2 Committees and Commissions of Council Meetings Advisory Design Panel January 19, 2022 702 Reports 702.1 Council Workplan Matrix -March 8, 2022 703 Correspondence 704 Release of Items from Closed Council Status 705 Recommendation to Receive Items on Consent 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 900 CORRESPONDENCE 1000 BYLAWS 1100 COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The items in the "Committee Reports and Recommendations" category are staff reports presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting, typically a week prior, to provide Council with an opportunity to ask staff detailed questions. The items are now before the regular Council Meeting for debate and vote. Both meetings are open to the public. The reporls are not reprinted again in hard copy, however; they can be found in the electronic agenda or in the Committee of the Whole agenda package dated accordingly. Planning and Development Services 1101 2021-457-RZ, Addendum to Regulation of Pharmacies Staff Report dated February 15, 2022 Staff report dated March 1, 2022, recommending that Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021, to limit the proliferation of pharmacies in the City of Maple Ridge, be given first and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing.
Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, March 8, 2022 Page 3 of 5 1102 2018-248-RZ, 21587 128 Avenue, A-2 to CS-4 Staff report dated March 1, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7822-2021 to rezone from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to CS-4 (Rural Commercial), to permit the future construction of a commercial building be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in the staff report. 1103 2021-579-RZ, 23682 Dewdney Trunk Road, M-1 to RM-1 and R-2 Staff report dated March 1, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7826-2022 to rezone from M-1 (Service Industrial) to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) and R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential), to permit a future subdivision of approximately two single-family lots and the future construction of approximately 16 townhouse units on a third lot, be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in the staff report. 1104 2022-028-RZ, 11758 221 Street & 22119, 22127, 22137, 22147, 22155, 22165 and 22173 Cliff Avenue Staff report dated March 1, 2022, recommending that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7828-2022, to redesignate 11758 221 Street & 22119, 22127, 22137, 22147, 22155 and 22165 Cliff Avenue from Single-Family Residential to Low Rise Apartment and 22173 Cliff Avenue from Single-Family Residential to Town Centre Commercial, be given first reading. Engineering Services 1131 Integrated Stormwater Management Plans -Update Staff report dated March 8, 2022, titled "Integrated Stormwater Management Plans Approval" seeking Council's endorsement-in-principle. Corporate Services Parks, Recreation and Culture Other Committee Issues Administration (including Fire and Police) 1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 1400 PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD
Council Meeting Agenda Tuesday, March 8, 2022 Page 4 of 5 1500 MAYOR AND COUNCILLOR REPORTS 1600 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING 1700 ADJOURNMENT
400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
400
City of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
February 22, 2022
The Minutes of the City Council Meeting held virtually and hosted in Council Chambers on
February 22, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British
Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business.
PRESENT
Elected Officials
Mayor M. Morden
Councillor J. Dueck
Councillor C. Meadus
Councillor G. Robson
Councillor R. Svendsen
Councillor A. Yousef
ABSENT
Councillor K. Duncan
Appointed Staff
S. Hartman, Chief Administrative Officer
C. Carter, General Manager Planning & Development Services
C. Crabtree, General Manager Corporate Services
D. Pollock, General Manager Engineering Services
P. Hlavac-Winsor, General Counsel and Executive Director,
Legislative Services
T. Thompson, Director of Finance
Other Staff as Required
C. Goddard, Director of Planning
F. Smith, Director of Engineering
Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
Video of the meeting is posted at media.mapleridge.ca/Mediasite/Showcase
Note: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Councillor Robson participated electronically.
The Mayor chaired the meeting from Council Chambers.
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
R/2022-CM-043
It was moved and seconded
That the agenda of the Regular Council Meeting of February 22, 2022 be
amended by removing Item 1102 and by adding an to Item 1301 Other Matters
Deemed Expedient; and further,
That the agenda as amended be approved.
CARRIED
401
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 2 of 15
400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
401 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February 8, 2022
R/2022-CM-044
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February 8, 2022 be adopted
as circulated.
CARRIED
500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL – Nil
600 DELEGATIONS – Nil
700 ITEMS ON CONSENT
701 Minutes
701.1 Meetings of the Development Agreements Committee
•February 3, 2022 and February 9, 2022
701.2 Committees and Commissions of Council Meetings:
Agricultural Advisory Committee
• December 2, 2021
Advisory Design Panel
• September 15, 2021
Community Heritage Commission
• November 18, 2021
•December 16, 2021
Environmental Advisory Committee
•November 17, 2021
Economic Development Advisory Committee
• September 16, 2021
•October 28, 2021
Municipal Advisory Committee on Accessibility and Inclusiveness
• September 23, 2021
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 3 of 15
Public Art Steering Committee
• September 9, 2021
Parks, Recreation and Culture Advisory Committee
• November 24, 2021
Social Policy Advisory Committee
• November 3, 2021
Transportation Advisory Committee
•June 23, 2021
702 Reports
702.1 Corporate Update – Q4 2021
Staff report dated February 22, 2022, providing information on Q4 2021.
702.2 Disbursements for the month ended January 31, 2022
Staff report dated February 22, 2022, providing information on disbursements
for the month ended January 31, 2022.
702.3 2022 Council Expenses
Staff report dated February 22, 2022, listing Council expenses recorded to
January 31, 2022.
703 Correspondence
703.1 Village of Cumberland – Support of Bill C-216
Letter dated January 28, 2022, from Mayor Leslie Baird, Village of Cumberland,
requesting support for Private Members Bill C-216, Health-Based Approach to
the Substance Use Act.
703.2 Village of Chase – Supporting BC Wildfires Petition – District of Lillooet
Letter dated February 1, 2022, from Mayor Rob Crowe, Village of Chase, outlining
a resolution passed by Chase Council, in support of the ‘Call to Action’ petition
and the District of Lillooet’s motion, regarding the increasing risk and
occurrences of wildfires, landslides and flooding in British Columbia.
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 4 of 15
704 Release of Items from Closed Council Status
From February 1, 2022 Closed Council Meeting
Item 4.1 Social Policy Advisory Committee Membership – 2022 Appointment -
That Nicole Nouch be appointed as a Member at Large for a two-year term
beginning January, 2022.
Item 4.2 CMR Housing Update
705 Recommendation to Receive Items on Consent
R/2022-CM-045
It was moved and seconded
That Item 702.1 “Corporate Update – Q4 2021” be pulled from Items on
Consent; and further,
That the remainder of items under “Items for Consent” agenda be received into
the record.
CARRIED
Council discussed the disbursements and staff responded to questions from Council.
R/2022-CM-046
It was moved and seconded
That Item 702.1 Corporate Update – Q4 2021 be received into the record.
CARRIED
800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS – Nil
900 CORRESPONDENCE – Nil
1000 BYLAWS
Note: Items 1001 to 1004 are from the February 15, 2022 Public Hearing
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 5 of 15
Bylaws for Third Reading
1001 2019-119-RZ, 12791 232 Street
1001.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019
To redesignate the subject property from Agricultural to Commercial.
R/2022-CM-047
It was moved and seconded
That Maple Ridge Official Community Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019 be given
third reading.
CARRIED
1001.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019
To rezone from RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to CS-1 (Service
Commercial).
R/2022-CM-048
It was moved and seconded
That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019 be given third reading.
CARRIED
1002 2019-239-RZ, 12610 228 Street
To rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached
(Low Density) Urban Residential.
R/2022-CM-049
It was moved and seconded
That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7574-2019 be given third reading.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 6 of 15
1003 2020-411-RZ, 21429 121 Avenue
To rezone from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low
Density) Urban Residential.
R/2022-CM-050
It was moved and seconded
That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7689-2020 be given third reading.
CARRIED
1004 2021-062-RZ, 25927 and 25801 128 Avenue
1004.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Amending Bylaw No. 7715-2021
To amend Policy 6-64 to include that until Policy 6-60 is satisfied, uses that
contribute to employment opportunities and do not require construction of
permanent structures or servicing upgrades, may be considered on a case by
case basis.
R/2022-CM-051
It was moved and seconded
That Maple Ridge Official Community Amending Bylaw No. 7715-2021 be given
third reading.
CARRIED
Councillor Robson – OPPOSED
1004.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7716-2021
To amend Section 502 A-2 Upland Agricultural, 502.2 Permitted Principal Uses
to include Outdoor Commercial Recreation, limited to outdoor paintball and laser
tag, and non-permanent structures, used for play and preparation on the subject
properties.
R/2022-CM-052
It was moved and seconded
That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7716-2021 be given third reading.
CARRIED
Councillor Robson – OPPOSED
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 7 of 15
Bylaws for Adoption
1005 2021-215-RZ, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7749-2021
Staff report dated February 22, 2022, recommending adoption.
A bylaw to set out housekeeping amendments to Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No.
7600-2019.
R/2022-CM-053
It was moved and seconded
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7749-2021 be adopted.
CARRIED
1006 2018-190-RZ, 23627 132 Avenue
Staff report dated February 22, 2022, recommending adoption.
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7470-2018
To rezone from RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Low
Density Townhouse Residential) to permit construction of a 23-unit residential
townhouse development.
R/2022-CM-054
It was moved and seconded
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7470-2018 be adopted.
CARRIED
1007 Aquifer Mapping Update, Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw, Maple
Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7802-2021
To remove the Figure 7 Aquifer Map from the Official Community Plan and clarify
that groundwater resources and regulations are the jurisdiction of the Provincial
government.
R/2022-CM-055
It was moved and seconded
That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7802-2021 be
adopted
CARRIED
Councillor Robson – OPPOSED
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 8 of 15
1100 REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Planning and Development Services
1101 Proposed New Cannabis Retail Store at Unit A 20757 Lougheed Highway
Staff report dated February 15, 2022, recommending that the application for a
non medical cannabis retail store by Chronic Cannabis located at Unit A-20757
Lougheed Highway, Maple Ridge not be supported and that a copy of the
resolution be forwarded to the Liquor and Cannabis regulation Branch.
R/2022-CM-056
It was moved and seconded
1.That the non medical cannabis retail application for Unit A – 20757 Lougheed
Highway be deferred; and
2.That the applicant be directed to apply for a zoning bylaw text amendment.
CARRIED
Councillor Robson – OPPOSED
1102 2021-457-RZ, Regulation of Pharmacies
Item referred back to staff from the Committee of the Whole Meeting of February
15, 2022.
1103 2019-013-RZ, 24156 104 Avenue, RS-3 to RM-1
Staff report dated February 15, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7814-2021 to rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural
Residential) to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential), to permit the future
construction of 21 townhouse units be given first reading and that the applicant
provide further information as described on Schedules C, D and G of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
R/2022-CM-057
It was moved and seconded
1.That Zone Amending Bylaw no. 7814-2021 be given first reading; and
further
2.That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C,
D and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 9 of 15
1104 2021-501-RZ, 24255 113 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-1d
Staff report dated February 15, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7825-2022 to rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural
Residential) to RS-1d (Single Detached (Half Acre) Residential) utilizing the
density bonus option to RS-1b (Single Detached (Medium Density) Residential),
to permit a future subdivision of approximately five lots be given first reading and
that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B, F,
and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the
information required for a Subdivision application.
R/2022-CM-058
It was moved and seconded
1.That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7825-2022 be given first reading; and
further
2.That the applicant provides further information as described on Schedules
B, F, and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along
with information required for a Subdivision application.
CARRIED
Councillor Robson – OPPOSED
1105 2021-565-RZ, 24301 126 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-2
Staff report dated February 15, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7824-2022 to rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural
Residential) to RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential), to permit a future
subdivision of two single-family lots be given first reading and that the applicant
provide further information as described on Schedules B and G of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information
required for a Subdivision application.
R/2022-CM-059
It was moved and seconded
1.That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7824-2022 be given first reading; and further,
2.That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B
and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the
information required for a Subdivision application.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 10 of 15
1106 2021-531-RZ, 22486, 22488, 22489, 22490, 22496, 22497 Brickwood Close
and 11649 & 11609 225 Street, Termination and Replacement of Land Use
Contract
Staff report dated February 15, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7747-2021 be given first and second
reading and forwarded to a Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending
Bylaw No. 7740-2021 to rezone the subject properties regulated by a Land Use
Contract to RS-1 (Single Detached Residential), be given first and second reading
and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
R/2022-CM-060
It was moved and seconded
1.That in respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for
consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community
Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically:
i.The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan
is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
ii.The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered
by the plan;
iii.The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by
the plan;
iv.First Nations;
v.Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards;
and
vi.The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies;
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required
in respect of this matter beyond the posting of the proposed Official Community
Plan amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to
comment, and;
2.That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7747-2021 be given first
and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing; and further
3.That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7740-2021 be given first and second reading
and forwarded to Public Hearing.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 11 of 15
1107 2021-532-RZ, 11581 256 Street, Termination and Replacement of Land Use
Contract
Staff report dated February 15, 2022, recommending that Official Community
Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7748-2021 be given first and second reading and
forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.
7710-2021 to rezone the subject property regulated by a Land Use Contract to
RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential), be given first and second reading and
be forwarded to Public Hearing.
R/2022-CM-061
It was moved and seconded
1.That in respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for
consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community
Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically:
i.The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is
located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
ii.The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by
the plan;
iii.The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the
plan;
iv.First Nations;
v.Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards;
and
vi.The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies;
and in that regard, it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in
respect of this matter beyond the posting of the proposed Official Community Plan
amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to
comment, and;
2.That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7748-2021 be given first
and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing; and further
3.That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7710-2021 be given first and second
reading and forwarded to Public Hearing.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 12 of 15
1108 2021-533-RZ, 11698 226 Street, Termination and Replacement of Land Use
Contract
Staff report dated February 15, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7807-2021 to create the new zone, CD-4-21
(Comprehensive District) and rezone the subject property regulated by a Land
Use Contract to CD-4-21, be given first and second reading and be forwarded to
Public Hearing.
R/2022-CM-062
It was moved and seconded
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7807-2021 be given first and second reading and
forwarded to Public Hearing.
CARRIED
1109 2021-534-RZ, 12309 240 Street, Termination and Replacement of Land Use
Contract
Staff report dated February 15, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7809-2021 to create the new zone, CD-5-21 (Nine-Hole Golf
Course) and rezone the subject property regulated by a Land Use Contract to CD-
5-21, be given first and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing.
R/2022-CM-063
It was moved and seconded
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7809-2021 be given first and second reading and
forwarded to Public Hearing.
CARRIED
1110 2018-190-DVP/DP, 23627 132 Avenue
Staff report dated February 15, 2022, recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal 2018-190-DVP and 2018-190-DP to reduce
setbacks from the buildings’ closest points from the north rear, west and east
side property lines, increase building height, and to reduce the Outdoor Amenity
Area.
The Corporate Officer advised that 200 notices were mailed out in relation to the
application and two pieces of correspondence were received expressing
opposition and/or concerns.
R/2022-CM-064
It was moved and seconded
1.That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-190-DVP
respecting property located at 23627 132 Avenue; and further
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 13 of 15
2.That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2018-190-DP
respecting property located at 23627 132 Avenue.
CARRIED
Councillor Robson – OPPOSED
1111 2021-473-DVP/DP, 11545 Kingston Street
Staff report dated February 15, 2022, recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal 2021-473-DVP and 2021-473-DP to reduce the
rear lot line setback.
The Corporate Officer advised that 39 notices mailed out in relation to the
application and one piece of correspondence was received in support.
R/2022-CM-065
It was moved and seconded
1.That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2021-473-DVP
respecting property located at 11545 Kingston Street;
2.That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2021-473-DP
respecting property located at 11545 Kingston Street; and further
3.That the City of Maple Ridge authorize the discharge of Restrictive Covenant
Registration Number AD207375) from the Title of Lot A District Lot 280 New
Westminster District Plan LMP 17888 located at 11545 Kingston Street.
CARRIED
1112 2021-112-DP, 22829, 22831 and 22833 122 Avenue
Staff report dated February 15, 2022, recommending that the Notice on Title
CA6356664 be discharged from the previous Intensive Residential Development
Permit and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2021-112-
DP to permit the construction of three intensive single detached residential
dwellings.
R/2022-CM-066
It was moved and seconded
1.That the Notice on Title CA6356664 be discharged from Title for previous
intensive Residential Development Permit; and further
2.That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2021-122-DP
respecting the properties located at 22829, 22831, and 22833 122 Avenue.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 14 of 15
Administration (including Fire and Police)
1191 Award of Contract RFP-HR21-33: Group Insurance and Administration for
Employee Benefits
Staff report dated February 22, 2002, requesting Council approval to award the
contract.
R/2022-CM-067
It was moved and seconded
1.That a five-year contract be awarded to PBC Health Benefits Society dba
Pacific Blue Cross at a projected cost of $888,000 per year, with an option to
renew the contract for two additional one-year periods, and further
2.That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
CARRIED
1200 STAFF REPORTS – Nil
1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT – Nil
1301 Response to Impact of Provincial Pandemic Restrictions on Recreation Facilities
and Mental Health of City residents
R/2022-CM-068
It was moved and seconded
That the City of Maple Ridge recognizes the negative impact on mental health
caused by social isolation during the Covid-19 pandemic and the mental and
physical benefits of recreation for our citizens;
that the Mayor request the provincial Minister of Health allow all individuals
access to civic recreation facilities paid for and maintained by their tax dollars
without restrictions in order to minimize social isolation and promote positive
mental health, with a carbon copy to the UBCM and other BC Municipalities.
CARRIED
Councillor Robson and Councillor Yousef – OPPOSED
Council Meeting Minutes
February 22, 2022
Page 15 of 15
1400 PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD – Nil
1500 MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS’ REPORTS
The Mayor and Council members provided their reports on activities participated
in during the past few weeks.
1600 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS
1700 ADJOURNMENT – 7:36 p.m.
_______________________________
M. Morden, Mayor
Certified Correct
___________________________________
P. Hlavac-Winsor, Acting Corporate Officer
402City of Maple Ridge REPORT OF PUBLIC HEARING February 15, 2022 The report of the Public Hearing held as a virtual meeting hosted in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia on February 15, 2022 at 7:01 p.m. PRESENT Elected Officials Councillor J. Dueck Councillor C. Mead us Councillor G. Robson Councillor R. Svendsen Councillor A. Yousef ABSENT Mayor M. Morden Councillor K. Duncan Appointed Staff S. Hartman, Chief Administrative Officer C. Carter, General Manager Planning & Development Services C. Crabtree, General Manager Corporate Services D. Pollock, General Manager Engineering Services P. Hlavac-Winsor, General Counsel and Executive Director, Legislative Services S. Nichols, Corporate Officer Other Staff as Required M. Baski, Senior Planner C. Goddard, Director of Planning J. Kim, Computer Support Specialist Note: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Councillor Dueck, Councillor Meadus, Councillor Robson, Councillor Svendsen, and Councillor Yousef participated electronically. The Acting Mayor chaired the meeting from Council Chambers. Acting Mayor Dueck called the meeting to order. The Corporate Officer explained the procedure and rules of order of the Public Hearing and advised that the bylaws will be considered further at the next Council Meeting on February 22, 2022. The Acting Mayor then called upon the Planning Department staff to present the following items on the agenda: 1) 2020-411-RZ, 21429 121 Avenue Lot C District Lot 245 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19628 The subject application is to permit the future subdivision of two lots. 1a) Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7689-2020 To rezone from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential). The Senior Planner gave a detailed description providing information on the application.
City of Maple Ridge Public Hearing Minutes February 15, 2022 Page 2 The Corporate Officer advised that 39 notices were mailed out in relation to this application and that no correspondence was received in response. The Acting Mayor called for speakers a first time. Ranner Noot and Amy Cocking R. Noot and A. Cocking expressed concerns with the potential height of the homes and potential lack of privacy. In response to questions about the process to comment and get further information on the proposed development, the Acting Mayor advised that after the meeting no further comment can be received by Council and that staff are available to assist. The Acting Mayor called for speakers a second and third time. There being no further comment, the Acting Mayor declared this item dealt with. 2) 2019-119-RZ, 12791232 Street Lot 44 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 30199 The subject application is to permit the future construction of a 2,055 m2 (22,120 ft2) two-storey commercial building. 2a) Maple Ridge Official Community Amending Bylaw No. 7557-2019 To redesignate the subject property from Agricultural to Commercial. 2b) Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7558-2019 To rezone from RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to CS-1 (Service Commercial). The Senior Planner gave a detailed description providing information on the application. The Corporate Officer advised that 18 notices were mailed in relation to the item and that correspondence was received from A. Jasamanidse expressing various concerns with the application, and that correspondence was received from J. Jude opposing the application. The Acting Mayor called for speakers three times. There being no comment, the Acting Mayor declared this item dealt with. 3a) 2019-239-RZ, 12610 228 Street Parcel "A" (Reference Plan 22408) Lot 3 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 5430
City of Maple Ridge Public Hearing Minutes February 15, 2022 Page 3 The subject application is to permit the future subdivision of approximately eight lots over two phases. 3a) Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 757 4-2019 To rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential). The Director of Planning gave a detailed description providing information on the application. The Corporate Officer advised that 78 notices were mailed out in relation to this application and that correspondence opposing the application was received from L. Bordignon, N. Bordignon, E. and J. Diehl, and a Maple Ridge resident. The Acting Mayor called for speakers a first time. Laura Bordignon L. Bordignon expressed concerns with privacy, noise and the potential devaluation of her home. The Acting Mayor called for speakers a second and third time. There being no further comment, the Acting Mayor declared this item dealt with. 4a) 2021-062-RZ, 25927 and 25801128 Avenue Parcel "A" (Reference Plan 3015) of the South West Quarter Section 25 Township 12 except: Parcel "ONE" (Reference Plan 17316) New Westminster Land District; and Parcel "ONE" (Reference Plan 17316) of Parcel "A" (Reference Plan 3015) of the South West Quarter Section 25 Township 12 New Westminster Land District The subject application is to permit an Outdoor Commercial Recreation (outdoor paintball and laser tag) use within a defined portion of forested land in the southern part of the subject properties. 4a) Maple Ridge Official Community Amending Bylaw No. 7715-2021 To amend Policy 6-64 to include that until Policy 6-60 is satisfied, uses that contribute to employment opportunities and do not require construction of permanent structures or servicing upgrades, may be considered on a case by case basis. 4b) Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7716-2021 To amend Section 502 A-2 Upland Agricultural, 502.2 Permitted Principal Uses to include Outdoor Commercial Recreation, limited to outdoor paintball and laser tag, and non-permanent structures used for play and preparation on the subject properties.
City of Maple Ridge Public Hearing Minutes February 15, 2022 Page 4 The Director of Planning gave a detailed description providing information on the application. The Corporate Officer advised that 32 notices were mailed out in relation to this application and that correspondence opposing the application was received from G. Herchuk. The Acting Mayor called for speakers a first time and second time. Linda Kingsbury L. Kingsbury expressed concerns with the application in relation to increased traffic, noise and use of employment designated land. John Kingsbury J. Kingsbury expressed concern with the location of the application in relation to Kanaka Creek and the bird sanctuary across the street from the proposed use. Mr. Kingsbury spoke to the road maintenance and current drainage issues on 128th. The Acting Chair called for speakers a third time. Fionna Christensen F. Christensen expressed concerns with the safety of horseback riding and truck traffic on 128 Avenue, and agreed with the concerns raised by the previous speakers. John Kingsbury J. Kingsbury expressed further concern with traffic on 128 Avenue and road damage from the gravel and movie trucks. The Acting Mayor called for speakers a final time. There being no comment, the Acting Mayor declared this item dealt with. Having given all those persons whose interests were deemed affected by the matters contained herein a chance to be heard, the Acting Mayor adjourned the Public Hearing at 7:45 p.m. J. Dueck, Acting Mayor Certified Correct S. Nichols, Corporate Officer
700 ITEMS ON CONSENT
700
701 Minutes
701
701.1February 23, 2022 Mayor's Office CIRCULATED TO: Michael Morden, Mayor Chair CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE Scott Hartman, Chief Administrative Officer Member Catherine Schmidt, Recording Secretary 1. 22-102466 BG LEGAL: PID: LOCATION: OWNER: Parcel "A" (Reference Plan 16582) Lot 1 Section 25 Township 9 and District Lot 262 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 3512 010-991-905 13055 210 Street Karamjeet and Manpreet Gill REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Temporary Residential Use Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO 22-102466 BG. 2. 21-110491 BG LEGAL: PID: LOCATION: OWNER: CARRIED Lot 4 Section 13 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP75231 031-015-646 25625 Bosonworth Avenue Eric and Katelyn Westlund REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Sewage Disposal/ Septic Covenant Release of Covenant (CA 7960996) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO 21-110491 BG. CARRIED
Development Agreements Committee February 23, 2022 3. 2016-27 4-SD LEGAL: PIO: LOCATION: OWNER: Lots 1 and 2, both of Section 24 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP70423 030-466-458/030-466-466 26110 & 26128 126 Avenue Giovanni and Tana Pacheco and Esparanza Developments Ltd. REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Septic Disposal Covenant (Lot 1) Release of Covenant (CA6819326) (Lot 1) Septic Disposal Covenant (Lot 2) Release of Covenant (CA6819326) (Lot 2) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO 2016-27 4-SD. 4. 21-114000 BG LEGAL: PIO: LOCATION: OWNER: CARRIED Lot 13 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan LMP44521 024-659-321 11540 239A Street Sureshwar and Renus Narayan REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Temporary Residential Use Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO 21-114000 BG. CARRIED Scott Hartman, Chief Ad · istrative Officer Member Page 2 of 2
March 2, 2022 Mayor's Office CIRCULATED TO: Michael Morden, Mayor Chair CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE Scott Hartman, Chief Administrative Officer Member Catherine Schmidt, Recording Secretary 1. 21-10077 4 BG LEGAL: PIO: LOCATION: OWNER: Lot "G" District Lot 245 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 19818 010-788-093 21661 Ridgeway Crescent Abhayjeet Singh and Grewal Shalija Tiwari REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Stormwater Management Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO 21-10077 4 BG. 2. 2021-473-DP LEGAL: PID: LOCATION: OWNER: CARRIED Lot 67 Except: Firstly; Part Subdivided by Plan 70055 Secondly; Part Subdivided by Plan 70496; Thirdly; Part Subdivided by Plan 86659 Fourthly Part Subdivided by Plan LMP24825 Fifthly; Part Subdivided by Plan LMP31249, District Lot 280 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 63221 001-983-938 11545 Kingston Street Buchmann Properties Inc. REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Release of Covenant (AD207375) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO 2021-473-DP. CARRIED
Development Agreements Committee March 2, 2022 3. 21-118179 BG/21-110365 BG LEGAL: PIO: LOCATION: OWNER: Lot 30 Section 32 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP93695; Lot 34 Section 32 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP93695; 030-913-225/030-913-268 14142 Mier Drive and 14119 Mier Drive Morningstar Homes Ltd. (Robert Bruno and Ryan Lucy) REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Temporary Residential Use Covenant (2) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO 21-118179 BG and 21-110365 BG. CARRIED 4. 21-118692 BG/21-119959 BG/21-120406 BG/ 21-121036 BG/ 21-121382 BG LEGAL: PIO: LOCATION: OWNER: Lot 59 Section 32 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP93695; Lot 63 Section 32 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP93695; Lot 64 Section 32 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP93695; Lot 67 Section 32 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP93695; Lot 109 Section 32 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP93695 030-913-519/030-913-551/030-913-560/030-913-594/030-914-019 14033 Buckels Drive, 14057 Buckels Drive, 14063 Buckels Drive, 14081 Buckels Drive, 14084 Buckels Drive Morningstar Homes Ltd. (Robert Bruno and Ryan Lucy) REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Temporary Residential Use Covenants (5) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO 21-118692 BG/21-119959 BG/21-120406 BG/ 21-121036 BG/ 21-121382 BG. Page 2 of 3
Development Agreements Committee March 2, 2022 5. 21-103471 BG LEGAL: PIO: LOCATION: OWNER: Lot 8 Section 31 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 8CP43178 028-105-770 21791136 Avenue Jarnail Singh 8iln and Jaspal Kaur 8iln REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Release of Covenant (88338162) Flood Protection Covenant Geotechnical Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO 21-103471 BG. 6. 20-121097 BG LEGAL: PIO: LOCATION: OWNER: CARRIED Lot 38 Section 23 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 43059 006-633-412 12564 251 Street Jorge Silva Gutierrez and Tirz Madrigal Gaviria REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Sump Pump Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO 20-121097 BG. CARRIED Scott Hartman, Chief Adminis tive Officer Member Page 3 of 3
701.2
Advisory Design Panel Minutes January 19, 2022 Regular Meeting Page 2 of 5 R/2022-003 It was moved and seconded That Meredith Mitchell be appointed Chair of the Advisory Design Panel for 2022. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY R/2022-004 It was moved and seconded That Andrea Scott be appointed Vice Chair of the Advisory Design Panel for 2022. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 5.3 Advisory Design Panel Overview The Staff Liaison provided an overview of the Advisory Design Panel. 6. PROJECTS 6.1 Development Permit No: 2018-489-RZ / 22058 119 Avenue The Chair welcomed the project team to the meeting and introduced the members of the ADP. The Staff Liaison provided a brief overview of a submission for an 88-unit, 4 storey apartment building. The project team presented the development plans and answered questions from the Panel. R/2022-005 It was moved and seconded That the Advisory Design Panel has reviewed application 2018-489-RZ and recommends that the application be supported and the following concerns be addressed as the design develops and submitted to Planning staff for follow-up: Architectural Comments: • Consider enhancement of exterior architecture through colour and articulation; • Consider enhancing prominence of main entry; • Provide ramp into main entrance for equal opportunity access; • Explore the interface with street for a more lively frontage; • Ensure number of bike racks meets minimum requirements and consider e-bike parking; • Consider third elevator and review code requirements for length of corridor and accessibility and convenience; • Consider compromised layout of units A and C, including sunlight and privacy. Landscape Comments: • Address limited diversity of tree species, in particular on slab; • Provide adequate soil volume for trees (10 m3 of soil per tree); • Ensure plant material is appropriate for light levels in northern courtyard; • Explore opportunities for increasing programming, e.g. children's play space or other; • Provide screening to temporary garbage pad on street frontage; • Consider expanding single row of shrubs in narrow terraced retaining wall planters. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Doc#2968050
Advisory Design Panel Minutes January 19, 2022 Regular Meeting Page 3 of 5 6.2 Development Permit No: 2020-421-DP/ 12026 Dunbar Street and 22137 Dewdney Trunk Road The Chair welcomed the project team to the meeting and introduced the members of the ADP. The Staff Liaison provided a brief overview of a re-submission for a 100-unit residential apartment building with 4 ground level commercial retail units. The project team presented the development plans and answered questions from the Panel. R/2022-006 It was moved and seconded That the Advisory Design Panel has reviewed application 2020-421-DP and recommends that the application be supported and the following concerns be addressed as the design develops and submitted to Planning staff for follow up: Architectural Comments: • Consider addition of decorative fagade with texture and colour on east and north sides; • Provide a visual cue to the commercial units through architectural and landscape elements; • Explore opportunities to provide natural light in parking through either skylights from above or openings in fagade. Landscape Comments: • Consider providing additional landscape behind separate amenity building on level 2; • Consider enhancing buffer and privacy of residential patios on Dunbar Street; • Consider additional programming of level 2 amenity area, including children's play; • Provide adequate soil volume for trees (10 m3 of soil per tree), including on slab. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 6.3 Development Permit No: 2021-586-DP/ 12051 & 12062 223 Street and 22295, 22255, 22289 & 22299 Dewdney Trunk Road The Chair welcomed the project team to the meeting and introduced the members of the ADP. The Staff Liaison provided a brief overview of a submission for an approximately 396-apartment and 1008 sq. m. of retail shops. The project team presented the development plans and answered questions from the Panel. R/2022-007 It was moved and seconded That the Advisory Design Panel has reviewed application 2021-586-DP and recommends that the following concerns be addressed and digital versions of revised drawings and memo be submitted to Planning staff; and further that Planning staff forward this on to the Advisory Design Panel for information. Architectural Comments: • Explore variability in texture, material or colour to enhance aspects of tower fins; • Enhance pedestrian character of corridor along all sides of clubhouse; • Increase prominence of front entrance to phase 3 building; • Consider additional elements to commercial fac;ade to integrate with surrounding buildings; • Consider incorporating copper paneling on amenity building into other buildings to provide campus character; • Incorporate colour glazing at rear of phase 3 into tower. Doc#2968050
Landscape Comments: Advisory Design Panel Minutes January 19, 2022 Regular Meeting Page 4 of 5 • Increase amenity areas on rooftop on building 3 for additional usable space; • Consider green roofs or green elements on lower buildings; • Consider decorative elements, such as a green wall, on second floor of clubhouse area to enhance south fac;ade with shade-tolerant plant material; • Ensure planting beds have appropriate planting materials and/or trees that will be tolerant to light conditions; • Provide adequate soil volume for trees (10 m3 of soil per tree); CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 6.4 Development Permit No: 2020-413-DP/ 10366 240 Street The Chair welcomed the project team to the meeting and introduced the members of the ADP. The Staff Liaison provided a brief overview of a submission for a 30-unit townhouse development under the RM-1 zone. The project team presented the development plans and answered questions from the Panel. R/2022-008 It was moved and seconded That the Advisory Design Panel has reviewed application 2020-413-DP and recommends that the following concerns be addressed and digital versions of revised drawings and memo be submitted to Planning staff; and further that Planning staff forward this on to the Advisory Design Panel for information. Architectural Comments: • Consider detailing for roof maintenance and drainage for shed roofs; • Review overhangs in consideration with architectural intent; • Consider bookending colour palettes of building blocks; • Ensure vehicle parking spaces have adequate maneuvering space; • Confirm internal road widths meet zoning bylaw; • Confirm tandem parking is full car depth; • Explore alternate window rhythm on street frontage. Landscape Comments: • Explore alternative programming in small amenity spaces at units 14 and 5; • Consider incorporating tree protection area into amenity area; • Improve access to amenity area for residents of buildings 1, 2 and 3; • Examine consistency of grading between patio and yard space and potential issues for stormwater management; • Consider planting in internal roads. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Note: J. Gabri recused himself from agenda item 6.5 as he is the Architect for the project. Note: J. Gabri left the meeting at 10:08 pm. Doc#2968050
6.5 Development Permit No: 2018-289-DP/ 22058119 Avenue Advisory Design Panel Minutes January 19, 2022 Regular Meeting Page 5 of 5 The Chair welcomed the project team to the meeting and introduced the members of the ADP. The Staff Liaison provided a brief overview of a re-submission for a 102-unit townhouse development. The project team presented the development plans and answered questions from the Panel. R/2022-009 It was moved and seconded That the Advisory Design Panel has reviewed application 2018-289-DP and recommends that the following concerns be addressed and digital versions of revised drawings and memo be submitted to Planning staff; and further that Planning staff forward this on to the Advisory Design Panel for information. Architectural Comments: • Improve connection from indoor amenity to outdoor amenity spaces; • Explore series of colour palettes to improve massing and wayfinding; • Explore opportunities for rooftop patios; • Explore opportunities to increase prominence of front entries. Landscape Comments: • Address isolation of outdoor amenity space and limited access to central amenity area; • Incorporate dedicated pedestrian circulation and cross paths to enhance walkability of site; • Improve limited bike parking options with better integration into entire site; • Highlight access to outdoor amenity spaces with road treatment; • Consider additional bio swales to improve permeability in open spaces; • Review narrow terraced walls for required soil volume for trees (10 m3 of soil per tree); • Provide complete landscape plans for review to panel; • Triangular landscape median appears to be opportunity for feature. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY JASWINDER GABRI DID NOT VOTE 7. CORRESPONDENCE 8. ADJOURNMENT -10:25 pm. The next regular meeting of the Advisory Design Panel will be held on Wednesday, February 16, 2022. Wendy Cooper, Acting Chair Meredith Mitchell, Chair Doc#2968050
702 Reports
702
702.1
1100 COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1101TO: FROM: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: March 1, 2022 FILE NO: 2021-457-RZ MEETING: C o W SUBJECT: ADDENDUM to Regulation of Pharmacies Staff Report dated February 15, 2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: At the February 15, 2022 Committee of the Whole Council Meeting, Council deferred consideration of Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 by two weeks and requested a list of possible options to consider given Council comments. Proposed Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 is intended to limit the proliferation of pharmacies in the City of Maple Ridge. Outlined below are four possible options for Council to consider. The February 15, 2022 Staff Report (including proposed bylaw and appendices) is attached with this report for Council consideration at the March 1, 2022 Committee of the Whole Council Meeting. There is currently a moratorium on pharmacy applications in the City of Maple Ridge. Possible regulatory land use options, including possible additional or amended recommendations, in response to Council comments, are as follows: A) Reduce the identified threshold regulating the size of pharmacies within the Town Centre Area. Currently proposed at 700 square meters of Gross Leasable Area, measured in accordance with BOMA Standard Method of Measurement, this could be reduced to any size Council desires, for example 250 or 500 square meters. The intent of the regulation remains the same, however, additional units within the Town Centre Area may become available for a future pharmacy, depending on the reduction in size. Should Council wish to implement this option, Council could direct staff to amend Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 with the following, or similar, to Section 402.22 1. B before first reading: Doc # 3009450 b. shall not be permitted as an Accessory Use in a commercial establishment, where the retail sale of goods or services are provided, with a Gross Leasab/e Area in accordance with Building Owners and Managers Association Standard Methods of Measurement (ANSI/BOMA Z65.5-2020) Jess than or equal to 500 square metres on a Jot within the Town Centre Area, as identified on Schedule "C" (Town Centre Area Plan) of this Bylaw; c. shall be permitted as an Accessory Use in a commercial establishment, where the retail sale of goods or services are provided, with a Gross Leasab/e Area in accordance with Building Owners and Managers Association Standard Methods of Measurement (ANSVBOMA Z65.5-2020) greater than 500 square metres on a Jot within the Town Centre Area, as identified on Schedule "C" (Town Centre Area Plan) of this Bylaw; and Page 1 of 3
B) Include a site-specific text amendment permitting the use at an identified civic address. Should Council wish to move Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 forward, with the identified size regulation for the Town Centre Area and geographic distance requirement outside of the Town Centre Area, Council may consider a site-specific text amendment for any application that comes forward intending to operate in a unit that does not align with the proposed regulations. A site specific text amendment application can occur at any time following the adoption of the subject Zone Amending Bylaw and would require the typical four readings of Council and a Public Hearing. Should the civic address of a specific site, not yet publicly disclosed, be considered by Council to be an appropriate location for a pharmacy use that would not align with the proposed Zone Amending Bylaw, Council could direct staff to insert the following, or similar, amendment to Section 402.22 1 b before first reading: ... except: i. The property legally described as [Insert Legal Address] that is permitted an Accessory Pharmacy Use in a commercial establishment, where the retail sales of goods or services are provided, with a Gross Leasable Area in accordance with Building Owners and Managers Association Standard Methods of Measurement (ANSI/BOMA Z65.5-2020) greater than or equal to 250 square meters. C) Direct staff to develop additional land use regulation through a separate zone amending bylaw. Should Council wish to further regulate land uses, Council can direct staff to develop possible options to regulate specific land uses in addition to the pharmacy regulations outlined in Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021, by directing staff through the following, or similar, resolution: That staff be directed to explore possible regulatory options to regulate [insert identified use] in Maple Ridge. Should Council direct this work, staff would come back to Council with an options report, which would outline possible regulator options for Council to consider. From there, a zone amending bylaw would be drafted and go through the approval process, including four readings of council and a Public Hearing. D) Defer or defeat Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 and remove Pharmacy Moratorium. Should Council wish to permit a pharmacy application at a site that as of yet is not disclosed while maintaining the regulatory thresholds identified in Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 and/or did not want to potentially incur additional time or costs to a potential applicant incurred through Option B, detailed above, Council could defer or defeat Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 in its entirety and remove the Pharmacy Moratorium in the City. Providing a pharmacy application is on a lot where retail and professional services are permitted, the use could take place today with no further land use regulations. The business license application process would still apply. Doc # 3009450 Page 2 of 3
RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 be given first and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. Alternative Recommendations: A. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021, including Option A amendment outlined in the staff addendum dated March 1, 2022, be given first and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. B. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021, including Option B amendment outlined in the staff addendum dated March 1, 2022, be given first and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. C. That staff be directed to explore possible regulatory options to regulate [land use] in Maple Ridge. D. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 be defeated and that the moratorium on pharmacy applications in the City of Maple Ridge be lifted. "Original signed by Amanda Grochowich" Prepared by: Amanda Grochowich, MCIP, RPP Planner 2 "Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning and Development "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Staff report dated February 15, 2022 titled "First and Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 Regulation of Pharmacies" Doc # 3009450 Page 3 of 3
TO: FROM: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer APPENDIX A MEETING DATE: February 15, 2022 FILE NO: 2021-457-RZ MEETING: C o W SUBJECT: First and Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 Regulation of Pharmacies EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In September 2021, Council directed staff to bring forward a report regarding the regulation of pharmacies in Maple Ridge and also passed a motion to hold applications for new pharmacies in abeyance. At the November 2, 2021 Council Workshop, Council directed that staff prepare a hybrid zone amending bylaw of option 1 and option 2, as detailed in the November 2, 2021 staff report. This staff report and attached zone amending bylaw is the result of the work undertaken on Pharmacy· regulation to date. Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 (Appendix A) proposes to prohibit all principal pharmacies within the City of Maple Ridge. It proposes prohibiting accessory pharmacy uses in commercial establishments with less than 700 square meters of Gross Leasable Area, measured in accordance with SOMA Standard Method of Measurement, as well as regulating pharmacies outside of the Town Centre Area by implementing a geographic buffer of 400m between new pharmacy applications. Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 is presented to Council for consideration of first and second reading. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 be given first and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. 1.0 BACKGROUND: At the September 14, 2021 Council Meeting, the following notice of motion was put forward regarding the options available to Council to limit pharmacies: That Council direct staff to bring back a report regarding the options available to Council to limit pharmacies and further, that applications for pharmacies be held pending the outcome of review. The motion was discussed at the September 28, 2021 Council Meeting and the following resolution was passed by Council: That staff bring back a report and draft bylaw to limit pharmacy use in the Town Centre; and further, that applications for pharmacies be held in abeyance pending the option of a Zone Amending Bylaw. Doc # 2989079 Page 1 of 4
At the November 2, 2021 Council Workshop, staff presented a report (Appendix B) outlining four possible options to regulate pharmacy use in the City. At that meeting, the following resolution was passed by Council: That applications for Pharmacy Business Licenses in the Town Centre Area continue to be held in abeyance until adoption of a Zone Amending Bylaw; and further That the item be referred back to staff to prepare a hybrid of option one and two for further consideration of a Zone Amending Bylaw at a future Committee of the Whole Meeting. Where option 1 speaks to the prohibition of new small-scale pharmacies in the Town Centre Area and option 2 to the regulation of pharmacies outside of the Town Centre Area by implementing a geographic buffer of 400m between new pharmacy applications. As of January 2022, the City of Maple Ridge has licensed 24 pharmacies, with the majority (17) located in the Town Centre Area of Maple Ridge. Pharmacies in Maple Ridge range in size from a standalone small-scale commercial use to those that are integrated with large scale grocery stores. The majority of local pharmacies are in small-scale commercial spaces and in some cases associated with a neighbouring medical or walk-in clinic use. Nine Maple Ridge pharmacies are integrated into larger scale grocery or retail spaces (i.e. Shoppers Drug Mart and London Drugs). 2.0 DISCUSSION: 2.1 Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 Based on the Council motion passed on November 2, 2021, Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 has been prepared, incorporating a hybrid approach of the 'option 1' and 'option 2' detailed in the November 2, 2021 staff report. i) Defining Pharmacy Use Currently, pharmacies are not defined as a separate identifiable use in the Zoning Bylaw. Pharmacy use is permitted through a combination of land uses including 'retail' and in some cases, in conjunction with 'professional services' depending on any proposed related services. In order to implement the proposed regulations outlined in Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021, a definition for pharmacy is now proposed: PHARMACY means a Use in a commercial establishment, where the retail sale of goods or services are provided, which dispenses a broad range of pharmaceutical prescriptions that is licensed as a pharmacy under the Pharmacy Operations and Drug Scheduling Act. Pharmacy use is proposed to be permitted in a range of commercial oriented zones, including: C-1 Neighbourhood Commercial, C-2 Community Commercial, C-3 Town Centre Commercial, C-5 Village Centre Commercial, CRM Commercial / Residential, H-1 Heritage Commercial, and H-2 Hammond Village Commercial. · ii) Town Centre Area Plan The first component of Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 is to prohibit new small-scale pharmacies in the Town Centre Area. Under the wording provided in the Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021, the City would continue to accept applications in the Town Centre for pharmacies in conjunction with larger retail spaces (such as a grocery store), providing there is a a Gross Leasable Area in accordance with Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) Standard Methods of Doc # 2989079 Page 2 of 4
3.0 POLICY IMPLICATIONS: The City of Maple Ridge Official Community Plan and Town Centre Area Plan include policies that speak to the priority function of commercial uses that support the residential population of the Town Centre with the provision of necessary goods, including food, and services, such as medical care, and that these uses will be encouraged to develop or remain in and around the Central Business District of the Town Centre and in the commercial designated areas of Port Haney. 4.0 INTERDEPARTMENTAL IMPLICATIONS: The review and permitting of business license regulation is a multi-department undertaking between the Planning, Bylaw & Licensing Services, Building, and Economic Development Departments. All departments continue to envision a continued collaborative working relationship to ensure the successful implementation of the Council-approved direction for the regulation of pharmacies in Maple Ridge. CONCLUSION: At the November 2, 2021 Council Workshop, Council directed that staff prepare a hybrid zone amending bylaw of option 1 and option 2 as detailed in the November 2, 2021 staff report. Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 proposes to prohibit new small-scale pharmacies in the Town Centre Area and regulate pharmacies outside of the Town Centre Area by implementing a geographic buffer of 400m between new pharmacy applications. "Original signed by Amanda Grochowich" Prepared by: Amanda Grochowich, MCIP, RPP Planner 2 "Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning and Development "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A: Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021 Appendix B: November 2, 2021 Council Workshop Staff Report Doc # 2989079 Page 4 of 4
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7790 -2021 A Bylaw to amend Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 -2019 as amended APPENDIX A WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 -2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7790-2021." 2. That PART 2 INTERPRETATIONS AND DEFINITIONS, Section 202 Definitions, that the definition of "Pharmacy" is inserted between "PERSONAL SERVICES" and "PLACE OF WORSHIP": PHARMACY means a Use in a commercial establishment, where the retail sale of goods or services are provided, which dispenses a broad range of pharmaceutical prescriptions that is licensed as a pharmacy under the Pharmacy Operations and Drug Scheduling Act. 3. That PART 4 GENERAL REGULATIONS, Section 401.3 Prohibited Uses of Land, Buildings and Structures is amended by inserting the following after sub-bullet f. and re-lettering the section accordingly: g. a Principal Use as a Pharmacy 4. That PART 4 GENERAL REGULATIONS, Section 402 Regulations for Permitted Uses of Land, Buildings, and Structures is amended by inserting the following between 402.21 Parking and Storing of Unlicensed Vehicles and Contractor's Equipment and 402.22 Produce Sales, and renumbering the section accordingly: 402.22 Pharmacy 1. A Pharmacy Use is subject to the following provisions: a. shall not be permitted as a Principal Use; b. shall not be permitted as an Accessory Use in a commercial establishment, where the retail sale of goods or services are provided, with a Gross Leasable Area in accordance with Building Owners and Managers Association Standard Methods of Measurement (ANSI/BOMA 265.5-2020) less than or equal to 700 square metres on a lot within the Town Centre Area, as identified on Schedule "C" (Town Centre Area Plan) of this Bylaw; c. shall be permitted as an Accessory Use in a commercial establishment, where the retail sale of goods or services are provided, with a Gross Leasable Area in accordance with Building Owners and Managers Association Standard Methods of Measurement (ANSI/BOMA 265.5-2020) greater than 700 square metres on a lot within the Town Centre Area, as identified on Schedule 11C" (Town Centre Area Plan) of this Bylaw; and d. shall be permitted as an Accessory Use outside of the Town Centre Area, as identified on Schedule "C" (Town Centre Area Plan) of this Bylaw, if located more than 400 meters, measured in a straight line from the Lot Lines, to another Pharmacy Use. 5. That PART 7 Commercial Zones, Section 701 Zone: C-1 Neighbourhood Commercial is amended by inserting the following after 701.3 1. e. f. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw.
6. That PART 7 Commercial Zones, Section 702 Zone: C-2 Community Commercial is amended by inserting the following after 702.3 1. e. f. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw. 7. That PART 7 Commercial Zones, Section 703 Zone: C-3 Town Centre Commercial is amended by inserting the following after 703.3 1. d. e. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw. 8. That PART 7 Commercial Zones, Section 705 Zone: C-5 Village Commercial is amended by inserting the following after 705.3 1. d. e. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw. 9. That PART 7 Commercial Zones, Section 707 Zone: CRM Commercial/ Residential is amended by inserting the following after 707 .3 1. d. e. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw. 10. That PART 7 Commercial Zones, Section 713 Zone: H-1 Heritage Commercial is amended by inserting the following after 713.3 1. d. e. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw. 11. That PART 7 Commercial Zones, Section 714 Zone: H-2 Hammond Village Commercial is amended by inserting the following after 714.3 1. c. d. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw. 12. That PART 10 Comprehensive Development Zones, Section 1023 CD-2-95 is amended by adding the following after 1023.2, 2 and amending the Section punctuation accordingly: 3. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw. 13. That PART 10 Comprehensive Development Zones, Section 1025 CD-2-98 is amended by inserting the following after 1025.1 c.: d. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw. 14. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 -2019 is amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of READ a second time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of ,20 , 20 ,20 , 20 I 20
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1~•-TO: FROM: mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer APPENDIX B MEETING DATE: November 2, 2021 FILE NO: 2021-457-RZ MEETING: Workshop SUBJECT: Proposed Options to Regulate Pharmacies in the Town Centre Area, Including a draft Zone Amending Bylaw EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In September 2021, Council directed staff to bring forward a report regarding the regulation of pharmacies in Maple Ridge and also passed a motion to hold applications for new pharmacies in abeyance. As of September 2021, 22 pharmacies were licensed by the City in addition to two pending applications. Of the 24 pharmacies, 17 are located within the Town Centre Area, as shown in Appendix A. This report outlines four possible options for the regulation of pharmacies in Maple Ridge, which include: • Option 1: Outright Prohibit New Small-Scale Pharmacies In the Town Centre Area (Recommended); -• Option 2: Introduce Geographic Buffers of 400 meters to Pharmacy Applications; • Option 3: Outright Prohibit New Pharmacies City-wide; or • Option 4: Status Quo. Hearing Council comments at the September 28, 2021 Council Meeting, a draft Zone Amending Bylaw has been developed given the parameters outlined In Option 1 for Council consideration and discussion. The draft zone amending bylaw Is included as a reference (Appendix B) and can be modified, based on Council direction, prior to proceeding to first reading. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That applications for Pharmacy Business Licenses In the Town Centre Area continue to be held In abeyance until adoption of a Zone Amending Bylaw; and further 2. That draft Zone Amendiryg Bylaw, to regulate new small-scale pharmacies in the Town Centre, be presented at an upcoming Committee of the Whole Meeting. Doc # 2900080 Page 1 of 7
Pharmacies in Maple Ridge range in size from a standalone small-scale commercial use to those that are integrated with large scale grocery stores. The majority of local pharmacies are In small-scale commercial spaces and in some cases associated with a neighbouring medical or walk-in clinic use. Nine Maple Ridge pharmacies are integrated into larger scale grocery or retail spaces (i.e. Shoppers Drug Mart and London Drugs). 2.0 DISCUSSION: Four options are provided for Council's consideration in regulating pharmacies In Maple Ridge: • Option 1: Outright Prohibit New Small-Scale Pharmacies in the Town Centre Area; • Option 2: Introduce Geographic Buffers of 400 metres to Pharmacy Applications; • Option 3: Outright Prohibit New Pharmacies City-Wide; and • Option 4: Status Quo. Specifically, while Section 2.1 outlines the proposed regulatory recommendation and provides a high-level review of what Is entailed, Section 2.2 outlines possible alternative options for Council to consider. 2.1 Proposed Recommended Option to Regulate Pharmacies in Maple Ridge Based on the Council motion passed on September 28, 2021, Option 1 is recommended and draft Zoning Amending Bylaw is attached for Council consideration. Additionally, Options 2 through 4 are also provided for Council to consider if an alternative direction is preferred. i) Option 1: Outright Prohibit New Small-Scale Pharmacies in the Town Centre Area (Recommended Option) The first identified option is to outright prohibit new small-scale pharmacies in the Town Centre Area. Under Option 1, applications for small-scale commercial pharmacies within the Town Centre Area would not be permitted. However, under the wording provided in the draft Zone Amending Bylaw (Appendix B), the City would continue to accept applications In the Town Centre for pharmacies in conjunction with larger retail spaces (such as a grocery store). For the purpose of Council consideration, the finished floor area of 700 square metres of retail space as the scale threshold has been selected for discussion purposes. While a new small-scale commercial pharmacy prohibition would be in effect in the Town Centre, under Option 1, new pharmacy applications would continue to be accepted for any commercial location within other commercial areas of the City, including the Lougheed Transit Corridor, Hammond, Albion and other village commercial nodes. Existing pharmacies In the Town Centre would be able to continue operating, as 1legally non-conforming', but these existing pharmacies would be limited in their ability to expand or relocate. Based on the Council resolution passed on September 28, 2021, Option 1 is the recommended approach and the draft Zone Amending Bylaw (Appendix B} is attached for Council's consideration. To implement Option 1, a Zone Amending Bylaw would require four readings of Council, and include a Public Hearing. Doc# 2900080 Page 3 of 7
II) Option 3: Outright Prohibit Pharmacies City-wide The third identified option is to outright prohibit new pharmacies of all sizes throughout Maple Ridge. A similar strategy has been employed by the City for Vape Retail operations, prohibiting the use in all zones of the Zoning Bylaw. Under Option 3, the City would no longer accept pharmacy applications for any location within the City. Existing pharmacies would be able to continue operating, as an adopted Zone Amending Bylaw that prohibits this use would make any legally operating pharmacy 'legally non-conforming', but these existing pharmacies would be limited in their ability to expand or relocate. The 700 square metres of finished floor area threshold could be included in this option as well. To implement Option 3, a Zone Amending Bylaw would be drafted and require four readings of Council, including a Public Hearing. This approach is not recommended since this use does not appear to be problematic outside of the Town Centre. iii) Option 4: Status Quo The fourth identified option Is to retain status quo. This would permit pharmacy applications to be considered on zone-appropriate lots -namely commercial zones, Including the C-1, C-2, C-3; C-5, CRM, CS-4, H-1, and H-2 zones. Under this option, new applications would be considered under the existing process involving evaluation of regulatory compliance before issuance of a business license. No Council review or approval process would be required. Existing pharmacies would be able to continue operating as legally conforming businesses. No bylaw amendments or other actions are required or proposed to implement this option. iv) Summary of Possible Options Option Concept Impact Implementation Tool 1 Prohibit Small-Scale • No small-scale applications Zone Amending Bylaw Pharmacies in the (under 700 m2 of retail space) (4 Readings of Council Town Centre Area. permitted in the Town Centre and a Public Hearing) to Area. define the use and set out • Applications permitted the prohibited area. throughout the rest of the City. Approval dependent on existing regulations and requirements. 2 Implement • Limited applications would be Zone Amending Bylaw Geographic Buffers accepted in the Town Centre (4 Readings of Council of 400 metres to Area. and a Public Hearing) to Pharmacy • Applications permitted define the use and set out Applications throughout the rest of the City. the geographic buffer. Approval dependent on existing regulations and requirements. Doc # 2900080 Page 5 of 7
to note that manufacturing is a core target sector for future economic development opportunities in Maple Ridge and that limiting or restricting a portion of the pharmaceutical value chain may have an impact on the perception of openness of the manufacturing portion of the pharmaceutical value chain. From a Community Safety perspective, the majority of the complaints received relate to smaller-scale pharmacies, often with specific OAT offerings included as part of the pharmacy. These pharmacies may struggle to manage the behaviors of their patients. It is recognized that COVID created a challenge where indoor occupancy limits pushed patients out of waiting rooms onto the adjacent sidewalks. While smaller-scale pharmacies, including OAT clinics, are valuable to residents, best practices should be focused on patient behavior management and reducing impacts on neighbouring businesses. CONCLUSION: In September 2021, Council directed staff to bring forward an options report regarding the regulation of pharmacies in Maple Ridge. This report outlines four possible options for the regulation of pharmacies in Maple Ridge, which include: Option 1: Outright Prohibit New Small-Scale Pharmacies in the Town Centre Area; Option 2: Introduce Geographic Buffers of 400m to New Pharmacy Applications; Option 3: Outright Prohibit New Pharmacies City-wide; Option 4: Status Quo. This report includes a draft of a possible Zone Amending Bylaw to limit pharmacies In the Town Centre Area, reflecting Option 1, for Council consideration of first and second reading at an upcoming Council meeting. "Original signed by Amanda Grochowich11 Prepared by: Amanda Groohowich, MCIP, RPP Planner 2 "Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning and Development "Original signed by Christine Carter11 for Concurrence: Al Horsman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A: Map of existing and pending pharmacies In Maple Ridge Appendix B: Draft Zone Amending Bylaw Appendix C: Map of existing and pending pharmacies in Maple Ridge with geographical buffer set at 400m Doc # 2900080 Page 7 of 7
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. XXX-2021 A Bylaw to amend Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 -2019 as amended APPENDIX B WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 M 2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. XXXX-2021." That PART 2 INTERPRETATIONS AND DEFINITIONS, Seqtiil~{Jt2 Definitions, that the definition of "Pharmacy" is inserted between "PERSONAL SER\1:1.CES:,; and "PLACE OF WORSHIP": PHARMACY means a Use in a commercial establi$.ffi:#f't~f~~l9,Q fills a broad range of ph a rm a ceuti ca I pr esc ri pti o ns. _.;;,f/:J:Jlf.:, · · · ·-i{1~f i~/&i"'-That PART 4 GENERAL REGULATIONS, qgptJon 402 Regulations fif((;~B,.~rmitted Uses of Land, Buildings, and Structures is amended by°'ln§~gJng the fo,IJpwing betv:J(~-0}402.21 Parking and Storing of Unlicensed Vehicles and Contract'orJs::,Equipm~bt and 402.:2l~fl~mduce Sales, and ;;:.:ting th:::~:::yacc9l'''!ifth. 'f{f!f ,,:: 'f{!®i 1. A Pharmacy Use is subJect,~g the'·;f¢..!JqwJng prov1$'fg:g§: a. shallJ1.Qt~!tPermitteill~~ Pr·i~:t1~l!1PJ§.~i. ·-:~{~f~fk:;-, b. shgJftf.f~fifjij;~~:¢..r.mitted asf~h.Acc~-~{$.~fy{(J~·.~:.in a doffimercial establishment with ,(ffBJ~hed fidti'f{~.;:a less t~~}.}12.li'Atia1 tc?7:Q8;?quare metres on a lot within the T6Wh.;:;Centre Are.a}as ldenttfi.etUoh Schedule ,tc" (Town Centre Area Plan) of this Byl~Vf~:;:;., }i}~ "{Jf::, ,,.,;~:~}? .. :-~·).·,,shall b1f~~xm.it1iit;~:r:~n,j\cce;J~ttuse in a commercial establishment with a .. iii~Wr:f'*lltfJi~~ed flB~lifi~fla"'gr~tMt~.R.~r16'.§1?quare metres on a lot within the Town .::f~flJ·· ·c-e·nxt~-::f..rea/a@~.entified··&n~:§9.b_~aule "C" (Town Centre Area Plan) of this ·'.\[!~\,. BylaMf~b.fl ··,:*1.f~::,. "::=:;::,· ·:-:::ft~:;,,., d. shall bif:~ijw1ittedlt.§i~J.n Accessory Use outside of the Town Centre Area. ·,?itt~t~. '·'.{~ffh. ·:·~rt.} That PAR]:~H, CommerciijH?Zones, Section 701 Zone: C-1 Neighbourhood Commercial is amended ·BW'.(~9;,~rting th~1tl@owing after 701.3 1. e. '<:~~;:{:;~:~:.. .~~~:!:::f i f. a ·pn~\ma.c.Y.'.iO~e, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw. That PART 7 Com·::;if:':ones, Section 702 Zone: C-2 Community Commercial is amended by inserting the following after 702.3 1. e. f. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw. 6. That PART 7 Commercial Zones, Section 70~ Zone: C-3 Town Centre Commercial is amended by inserting the following after 703.3 1. d. e. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw.
7. That PART 7 Commercial Zones, Section 705 Zone: C-5 Village Commercial is amended by inserting the following after 705.3 1. d. e. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw. 8. That PART 7 Commercial Zones, Section 707 Zone: CRM Commercial/ Residential is amended by inserting the following after 707 .3 1. d. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. e. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.22 of this Bylaw. That PART 7 Commercial Zones, Section 713 Zone: H-1 Heritage Commercial is amended by inserting the following after 713.3 1. d. e. a Pharmacy Use, subject to Section 402.2·2i(8fithls Bylaw. That PART 7 Commercial Zones, Section 714 Zon~ilHi[·~-~~mond Village Commercial Is amended by inserting the following after 714:~~)i:\f' ·-:~:t{:~h. d. a Pharmacy Use, subject to .. :§~i\ldh 402.22 of thl{~Y!.~w. That PART 10 Comprehensive Develop!!lt~l:i[les, Sectio.o 1023··:,~~~~ is amended by adding the following after 1023.2, 2 and an,M~J.og tb.€!1$Jotion punctua·Mh;~ccording1y: .·:~::~;::..... ·-·~:;~;:~:~~.~::;::.:::~:;~~;:,, ~-=:~:;~::, 3. a Pharmacy Use}@ijJ.~~9} to Sectior{:.1Wi)t2 of this Bylaw. ·.·.· .•:•:~;;.,~~:-~ .. ~=·· .... ~;:!· ... ~ READ.a second tim~Hffe "'.t~~::day of Pu:tlft1;~:G hel=,, ':f$j}y of READ a th1rchtfme the ~::::::::::: day of "·t::tJL. .-::::flJJf ADOPTED, the ·-::=~~lci~S,::~f ·-~-:;~:f·' , 20 ,20 ,20 , 20 ,20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1102[~·-TO: FROM: SUBJECT: mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7822-2021 21587 128 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: March 1, 2022 FILE NO: 2018-248-RZ MEETING: C o W An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 21587 128 Avenue, from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to CS-4 (Rural Commercial), to permit the future construction of a commercial building. The 0.357 hectare (0.88 acre) site is within the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR), but is exempt from the regulations of the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) due to its historic small parcel size. As the property is within the ALR, the property is designated Agricultural in the Official Community Plan (OCP) and in the Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) of Metro Vancouver. At the municipal level, the Official Community Plan must be amended in order to permit commercial development on the site, which triggers the need for an amendment to the Regional Growth Strategy. In order for these amendments to take place, the subject property must be excluded from the ALR. · A previous ALR exclusion application for the site was initially approved conditionally, by the ALC, who stipulated that they would need to approve the land use proposal during the rezoning process. This decision was later rescinded and denied out of concern for potential land uses on the site that could conflict with agricultural uses. The site therefore remains within the ALR. The exclusion of the subject property will need to follow the new process established by the ALC, which has eliminated the option for landowner applications. As a result, this application can only be advanced by City of Maple Ridge, and the process involves hosting a Public Hearing. This report will discuss the merits of this application, including policy considerations for introducing new commercial development in the community and outline the processes and agency approvals required to bring the applicant's proposal to fruition. The applicant has clarified their intent to develop the property into a rural commercial use, which will be significantly smaller in scale than was indicated in the previous exclusion application. Given the site context, rural uses are appropriate. As a smaller scale commercial development, the ALC may find that this revised proposal is defensible. On this basis, this application is found to be supportable and Council is recommended to advance this application to first reading. 2018-248-RZ Page 1 of 9
RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. In respect of Section 4 75 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies; and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment; 2. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7822-2021 be given first reading; 3. That the proposal be refined for Council consideration of the application to exclude the subject property from the Agricultural Land Reserve, and for hosting a Public Hearing for that purpose, along with the submission of $4,950.00 to cover application costs; and further 4. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C, and D, of Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Within Urban Area Boundary: OCP Major Corridor: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: 2018-248-RZ OTG Developments Ltd. Parcel B, Part SE1/ 4, Section 25, Township 9, New Westminster Land District, Ref Plan 13579; Except RD PL LMP2158 SEC 25; TWP 9; NWD AGR (Agricultural) Commercial No Yes A-2 (Upland Agricultural) CS-4 (Rural Commercial) Rural Residential A-2 Upland Agriculture Agricultural Page 2 of 9
South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Farm, Rural Residential RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Agricultural Rural Residential A-2 Upland Agriculture Agricultural Rural Residential A-2 Upland Agriculture Agricultural Residential Commercial 0.357 ha (0.88 acres) 216 Street Rural Standard The subject property is situated at the intersection of 128 Avenue and 216 Street. This parcel has a single detached dwelling and an accessory building upon it. The agricultural context surrounding the site is highly visible including forage crops, blueberries, and the blueberry processing plant to the west of the subject property. As a commuter route, 128 Avenue is an east-west arterial that provides the furthest north connection between 216 Street and the Pitt River Bridge, and the most direct access for Silver Valley residents. As it would serve both rural and urban traffic, this site may be a strategic location for modest commercial uses. c) Project Description: This application proposes to rezone the subject property from A-2 (Upland Agriculture) to CS-4 (Rural Commercial). Although the 0.357 ha (0.88 acre) site is exempt from the regulations of the ALC, it remains within the ALR and is designated as Agricultural in the OCP and in the Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy. Because the site is currently within the ALR, there are several steps required to bring this proposal to completion. In addition to municipal applications, these steps include agency approvals from the ALC and Metro Vancouver. There are a number of commercially zoned properties within Maple Ridge that are outside of the Urban Area Boundary. While these uses are typically modest in scale and geared towards serving the neighbouring population, their zoning is usually legal non-conforming and inconsistent with the Official Community Plan. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and further reports will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: The subject property is located outside of the urban area boundary and as such, urban levels of development are not typically supportable in this context. A number of considerations must be addressed prior to redevelopment occurring. These include: 2018-248-RZ Page 3 of 9
Commercial Development: In 2014 Council endorsed the Maple Ridge Commercial and Industrial Strategy. A key message of the strategy is that the designated commercial land supply in Maple Ridge is sufficient to meet future demand. Retention of commercially designated lands in the Town Centre and Silver Valley are important elements of the future commercial land supply, along with the maximization of the City's existing employment lands. As the identification of more commercial lands was not considered a priority, subsequent policy work in Maple Ridge has primarily focused on increasing industrial land supply. The Commercial and Industrial Strategy noted that the rural hamlets in Silver Valley would require patience, implying that a sufficient customer base to support retail would occur in the long term with buildout. The Strategy was less explicit in noting the importance of commercial development in fostering community connection, which was a key feature of the Silver Valley Area Plan. By its very nature, commercial development is population serving, and unlike industrial development, does not typically increase the regional economic base. Local economic benefits may be provided by new commercial development if there is consumer capture that would otherwise have spent money elsewhere. But the introduction of new commercial areas may also reduce or erode the customer base required to support existing and planned areas within the community. In this light, the intent of area planning initiatives such as the Silver Valley Area Plan should be considered. It should also be noted that the 128 Avenue corridor (in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows) has developed a number of agri-commercial destinations that highlight the 'farm-to-table' approach. These businesses enhance access to local produce and value added products. They also contribute to local character and the tourism industry in the community. These businesses align with both the City's and Metro Vancouver's Agricultural land use designation. Under the current A-2 zoning, the subject property is well located to further contribute to the growing agri-tourism destination in Maple Ridge. Although this proposal is small scale, it could enhance this area through the sale of local products and seasonal outdoor displays. At this stage, the applicant has not given a firm indication of the type of commercial envisioned for the site, although likely it will not be agricultural in nature, thereby triggering the need for a land use redesignation. Official Community Plan The subject property is outside of the Maple Ridge Urban Area Boundary, and the most supportable land use redesignation would be for Rural Commercial purposes. Section 6.3.8 of the OCP, titled "Rural Commercial", notes the following about the Rural Commercial designation: Rural Commercial centres cater to the daily convenience shopping and service needs of a rural population and provide a limited range of services. Rural Commercial retail centres are typically less than 93 m2 (1,000 ft2) in area. Community serving outdoor recreational facilities are a/so appropriate in the rural area. An example of the footprint of a 93 m2 (1,000 ft2) building is appended to this report as Appendix D. Policies pertaining to scale and compatibility of these commercial uses are provided by Policies 6-39 and 6-40 of the Official Community Plan, as follows: 6 -39 Rural Commercial Centres and outdoor commercial recreation facilities will be considered subject to satisfying Parking Bylaw and Zoning Bylaw requirements, traffic, access, site design, and compatibility with adjacent land uses. 2018-248-RZ Page 4 of 9
6 -40 Total commercial space in a Rural Commercial centre is typically less than 93m2 (1,000 ft2) in area. Outdoor commercial recreational facilities may exceed 93m2 (1,000 ft2) in area. Properties designated Rural Commercial align with the CS-4 Rural Commercial Zone, which is the applicant's stated intent. The CS-4 Rural Commercial Zone is limited in the maximum size of a commercial building, to 279m2, which is significantly larger than the maximum size recommended in the OCP. Because the proposed development is for non-farm uses adjacent to agriculture, a requirement of the rezoning application will be an agricultural impact assessment. The OCP would only support limited small scale commercial development within the context of the subject site. Therefore, a compatible rural commercial building would not unduly interfere with opportunities for commercially designated lands, such as those in Silver Valley, and could be supported. However, exact details from the applicant on the nature and size of the proposal are sparse. A further consideration is access to the site and traffic impacts. Potential conflicts must be considered and addressed prior to second reading. ALR Requirements: As the property is within the Agricultural Land Reserve, the ALC must approve an exclusion application prior to municipal and regional approvals of a land use designation amendment. As noted earlier in this report, the previous exclusion application (2017-198-AL) was initially conditionally approved by the Agricultural Land Commission, but that approval was subsequently rescinded and denied. Although this revised proposal is more supportable in a rural context than the previous application, there is no guarantee that the ALC will support the exclusion of the property from the ALR. The steps involved in this process are policy considerations that do not require detailed site planning and qualified professional analysis for a decision to be made. For this reason, out of consideration for the applicants persistent requests, a recommended approach is to apply for the exclusion application early in the process, prior to the interdepartmental referrals process. This would avoid requiring the applicant to invest in engineering and other consultant services for a project that may not be supported by senior agencies. It does, however, leave some doubt as to the true nature of the proposal. Changes to the ALC application process which came into effect on September 30, 2020 removed the ability of landowners to apply for exclusion applications, and transferred this jurisdiction solely to local governments and first nations. With this new approach, the ALC developed a number of steps that needed to be followed in the application process, with local government requirements including an application fee of $750.00 and hosting a Public Hearing. This matter was presented to Council at the November 10, 2020 Council Workshop. Recognizing that this change would entail additional costs, the staff report included the estimated costs of a local government initiated exclusion application. These costs included the public hearing fee (advertising, staff costs), staff report, and the $750.00 ALC fee. In total these costs were estimated to be $4,950.00. Upon their receipt of this information, Council passed the following resolution: 1. That staff prepare an amendment to Fees & Charges Bylaw No. 7575-2019 to establish a fee for exclusion applications; and 2. That staff prepare a Council Policy for the Processing of Applications for Exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve; and further 2018-248-RZ Page 5 of 9
3. That as an interim measure until the above noted Council Policy is endorsed, applications for exclusion for remnant parcels, properties within a Council-endorsed area planning process or other policy based criteria will be evaluated and based on merits may be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission. To date, no exclusion applications have been pursued, since the ALC change came into effect. This proposal may be the first, if Council gives first reading to the rezoning application. Based on the above Council resolution, a fee schedule is proposed to cover local government costs associated with this application. Metro Vancouver: In general, the Regional Growth Strategy designates all properties within the Agricultural Land Reserve as Agricultural. Any amendment to an agricultural designation could not occur without first excluding a property from the Agricultural Land Reserve. The Regional Growth Strategy is in the process of being updated, and is expected to be adopted later in 2022. It is anticipated that the overall intent of the Strategy will remain, although changes to the amendment process are likely. These changes are expected to include a greater emphasis on consultation rather than a formal public hearing. Although the amendment process is in transition, a rural land use designation for the site may be supportable. Rural lands are generally compatible with an agricultural context as they retain a rural character. As noted in the Regional Growth Strategy, the acceptable land uses in this context are low density residential, small scale commercial, industrial, and institutional uses that do not require sewer extension. The local government would need to apply for the Regional Growth Strategy amendment after third reading. This application could be included in the City's submission with other identified regional amendments anticipated for 2023. Zoning Bylaw: As noted, the subject property is within an area that has not been considered for commercial development, but the CS-4 Rural Commercial Zone is the most supportable, given the site context. Support for redevelopment of this property should prioritize low impact development that does not conflict with the agricultural potential of neighbouring properties, including low risk of soil or groundwater contamination. Principal permitted uses in the CS-4 Zone are limited to convenience store, restaurant, and retail uses. The maximum gross floor area for principal uses in the CS-4 Zone is 279m2, which is significantly greater than the 93m2 recommended maximum for rural commercial centres in the Official Community Plan. Of further note is the minimum parcel size for the CS-4 Rural Commercial Zone, which is 0.8 hectares (2 acres) served by on-site septic and community water. With a site area of 0.375 hectares (0.88 acres), the subject property is smaller than minimum lot size in the available zone. The site will need to rely on septic disposal. Although rezoning to CS-4 may be supportable, consideration for reducing the size and scale of development is warranted, given the stated direction of the OCP, and the noted site constraints, including parcel size, and the risk of interfering with traffic flows at this busy intersection. Uses that generate high traffic volumes would not be supportable at this location. A possible approach could be a restrictive covenant to limit the size and the type of uses that could be allowed on the site. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.5 of the OCP, a Commercial Development Permit application is required to address the current proposal's compatibility with adjacent development, and to enhance the unique character of the community. 2018-248-RZ Page 6 of 9
Advisory Design Panel: A Commercial Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. e) Next Steps: If this application is given first reading, the following steps will need to occur: 1. Refinement of proposal in support of Public Hearing and exclusion application; 2. Presentation of proposal to Council; 3. Council advancement of proposal to Public Hearing; 4. Council consideration of request to forward application to ALC. 5. If denied by Council, process ends; 6. If denied by the ALC, process ends; 7. If approved by the ALC, detailed site planning commences; 8. Full application submission, including OCP amendment, development permit application, receipt of consultant reports; 9. Interdepartmental referral process commences; 10. Development Information Meeting, and Advisory Design Panel Meeting; 11. Second reading, Public Hearing, third reading; 12. Council applies to Metro Vancouver for Regional Growth Strategy amendment. 13. If Metro Vancouver denies this request, the process ends; 14. If approved by Metro Vancouver, applicant completes third reading requirements; and 15. Adoption and approval of rezoning and development permit applications. f) Interdepartmental Implications: Preliminary discussions with the Engineering Department indicate that a recent upgrade along 128 Avenue with corner truncation would meet municipal standards. However, upgrades would likely be triggered for 216 Street, which is classified as an arterial road. These upgrades could include a 3 metre dedication and road widening of existing asphalt, or if supported, waiving these requirements with a Development Variance Permit. Existing storm drainage is likely sufficient. A site plan in support of this proposal has not been provided, but the Engineering Department indicates that the site will be limited to one access, which must be from the northern edge of the property along 216 Street. A more formal referral to the Engineering Department will be made after first reading, after the successful exclusion of the subject property from the ALR, and upon receipt of required consultant reports. Similarly, these steps will be required prior to referrals other internal departments and external agencies including: a) Operations Department; b) Fire Department; 2018-248-RZ Page 7 of 9
c) Building Department; d) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department; e) Utility companies; and f) Agricultural Land Commission. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. g) Early and Ongoing Consultation: In respect of Section 4 75 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an OCP amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. h) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended: 1. An OCP Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); and 3. A Commercial Area Development Permit Application (Schedule D). The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. i) Alternatives The subject property is constrained by its size and by its location outside of the Maple Ridge Urban Area Boundary. In contemplating supportable land use changes to the site, both the Regional Growth Strategy and the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan provide a consistent framework that can assist in ensuring that land use changes are compatible with an agricultural context. As a result, the supportable commercial land use for the subject property will be small scale. There are many steps required to realize this development. As a simpler alternative to redevelopment, the expanded home occupation options in the Zoning Bylaw would not require rezoning and could use the existing house for business and residential purposes. Given the limited potential of the site, this more cost effective option should be considered. Another alternative is to pursue an agri-tourism use in keeping with existing businesses in the area, which might not require land use designation and zoning bylaw amendments. A further alternative is to consider the proposal contrary to the agricultural nature of the area and deny the applicant's request. 2018-248-RZ Page 8 of 9
CONCLUSION: Based on the considerations as outlined in this report, there are many steps involving senior agency jurisdictions that would need to be addressed prior to advancing this proposal further. However, the development proposal is in compliance with the policies of the OCP. Justification has been provided to support an OCP amendment to a Rural Commercial centre. It is, therefore, recommended that Council grant first reading subject to the property being excluded from the ALR and additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. "Original signed by Charles Goddard" for Prepared by: Diana Hall, MA, MCIP, RPP Planner 2 "Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7822-2021 Appendix D -Example Site Plan showing a 93m2 building 2018-248-RZ Page 9 of 9
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7822-2021 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" Zoning Bylaw Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended APPENDIXC WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7822-2021." 2. That parcel of land and premises known and described as: Parcel B, Part SE1/ 4, Section 25, Township 9, New Westminster Land District, Ref Plan 13579; Except RD PL LMP2158 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1946 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to CS-4 (Rural Commercial). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of READ a second time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,20 ,20 , 20 ,20 ,20 CORPORATE OFFICER
11031~••• mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: March 1, 2022 FILE NO: 2021-579-RZ FROM: SUBJECT: Chief Administrative Officer First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7826-2022 23682 Dewdney Trunk Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING: C o W An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 23682 Dewdney Trunk Road, from M-1 (Service Industrial) to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) and R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) in order to permit a future subdivision of approximately two single-family lots and the future construction of approximately 16 townhouse units on a third lot. To proceed further with this application, additional information is required as outlined below. As per Council Policy 6.31, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) program. The CAC rates in Policy 6.31 are currently under review, and if approved at an upcoming Council meeting, it is anticipated that this application will be subject to new rates. The expected CAC contribution rate for this rezoning application will be confirmed in the second reading report. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7826-2022 be given first reading; and further 2. That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C and D of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision application. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Within Urban Area Boundary: OCP Major Corridor: 2021-579-RZ Geoff Lawlor Architect AIBC West 80.7 Feet East Half Lot 7 Except: Part Road on Plan 86679, Section 16, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 1676 Urban Residential Urban Residential Yes Yes Page 1 of 5
Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: South: East: West: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Use: Zone: M-1 (Service Industrial) RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential), R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) Single-Family Residential Designation: R-3 (Single Detached (Intensive) Urban Residential) Urban Residential Use: Zone: Single-Family Residential RS-1b (Single Detached (Medium Density) Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Use: Zone: Single-Family Residential RS-1b (Single Detached (Medium Density) Residential) and CD-1-93 (Amenity Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential Use: Industrial Zone: Designation: M-2 (General Industrial) Urban Residential Vacant Single-Family and Multi-Family residential 0.46 ha (1.1 acres) 119 Avenue and new lane Urban Standard The subject property is bounded by Dewdney Trunk Road to the north and 119 Avenue to the south. The property is relatively flat and is currently vacant; a mix of mature and adolescent trees and vegetation cover most of the property (see Appendices A and B). c) Project Description: The current application is proposing to rezone the subject property from M-1 (Service Industrial) to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) and R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) (see Appendix C) to permit the construction of approximately 16 townhouse units and approximately 2 single-family lots (see Appendices D and E). The two proposed R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) single-family lots will have parking provided onsite and will be accessible by the lane. The proposed townhouse units will be accessible from the lane extension as well as 119 Avenue. The townhouse units are configured in three buildings: two buildings containing 5 units and one 2021-579-RZ Page 2 of 5
building containing 6 units (see Appendices E and F). The application is proposing a floor space ratio of 0.65, which exceeds the base density of the RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) zone. Based on density bonus regulations in the zone, whereby bonus floor space can be achieved in exchange for the provision of $344.46 per m2 ($32.00 per ft2), the proposed additional density for the townhouse use would yield approximately $62,333.48. Additionally, the proposed residential parking for the townhouse units is proposed as a mix of side-by-side double car garage configuration (14 units) and 2 units will have parking in a single car garage and 1 space provided in a parking space adjacent to the unit. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and further reports will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and could change after servicing details and analysis reports are reviewed. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the Approving Officer. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject property is located within the Urban Area Boundary and is currently designated Urban Residential-Major Corridor. The development of the property is subject to the Major Corridor infill policies of the Official Community Plan (OCP). This designation supports ground-oriented multi-family housing as well as single-family residential and is more closely aligned with the OCP than the current M-1 (Service Industrial) zone. These policies state that development should be compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood and respect neighbourhood characteristics. The proposed R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) zoned lots continue with the existing neighbourhood pattern of lot sizes along Dewdney Trunk Road. The proposed rezoning to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) and R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) comply with the Urban Residential-Major Corridor designation and Major Corridor infill policies. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from M-1 (Service Industrial) to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) and R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) to permit the construction of 16 townhouse units and the subdivision of two single family lots. The proposed lot size for the RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) zoned portion is 0.37 ha (0.9 acres). The minimum lot size for the proposed R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) zone is 315.0 m2 (3390.6 ft2), the two proposed single family lots are proposed to be 369.0 m2 (3971.9 ft2). Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. 2021-579-RZ Page 3 of 5
Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. Advisory Design Panel: A Multi-Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. e) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department; f) School District; g) Utility companies; and h) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing and site access requirements have not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed, the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); 2. A Multi-Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D); and 3. A Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. 2021-579-RZ Page 4 of 5
CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading, subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. "Original signed by April Crockett" Prepared by: April Crockett Planning Technician "Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7826-2022 Appendix D -Proposed Subdivision Plan Appendix E -Proposed Site Plan Appendix F -Proposed Elevations 2021-579-RZ Page 5 of 5
APPENDIX CCITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7826-2022 A Bylaw to amend Schedule 'A' Zoning Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as 11Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7826-2022." 2. That parcel of land and premises known and described as: West 80.7 Feet East Half Lot 7 Except: Part Road on Plan 86679, Section 16, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 1676 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1951 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) and R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map 'A' attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first ti me the day of READ a second time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of ADOPTED the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,20 ,20 ,20 ,20 , 20 CORPORATE OFFICER
SUBDIVISION PLAN OF THE WEST 80.7 FEET EAST HALF LOT 7 SECTION 16 TOWNSHIP 12 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 1676 EXCEPT PLAN 86679 BCGS 92G. 028 0 ,........, 1htiilh:ntktlpJoltmoftldpk,n& sea mm ii llidlhbyH-finm .h~t {CJSUE)-"l,npJollld111to,cd1ofl:500 1h1U1Jl('OQ'W!a/ur.de,/htattdciblol.lt#~yodthvr!d ndt,rlredhmlll•IIASCOTpub!JMlfd~olutnd1tr:m1anJdt1"!/knl for get)(ktk ~trol mom.mOIU 01H24J9 r.,d BSIKJUZ IM1 plrn lll!on horlzmtd ,-d-h..-.1 1:fdar1cu ~u othlrNI ,p«JW To a:,mpul, ¢d Stimca; tmilfflf grwr1d-lnd datll'Kfl' by 1M ~ tcmbittd lrKl.or of o.s~n. 7m: o~ mnbhtd frKlor lhu bet11t tldenniitd bate<IMgt'Odetk('ll'lfrd-t""'1""-LEGEND: @ C«ltrolUomnnmtFOtJnd Standard Iron Post Ff'.Wld o St,;ndonllron PodSi,I Jl r 7 8 Pion BCPf171J 9 -10 Park 11 .{2 13 BCP971J Ron8CPdB47 Ff~/ 8CP971J Ffon / / ,· ./ _/ ,.;__/· ,"%,.~ , v· 14 15 16 Ba'971J Pton EKP971J _/ _/ / 17 18 19 Pion 80"971J PIM Dewdney Trunk Road Thlsplonllulrithlnthojmsdldlonofthe ApproWlo Olflccr for tho aty of Uoplo Rld,;e Thhplanllulrfth.hlhelltitro Vma,ure-Regfot'la/Dhtrkt. / 5 PRELIMINARY Rem J 7 (·· .. (·, .. Rem Parcel A P/f1('11676 J 119th Avenue 11 i 10 / _/ 20 80"97U / 21 21 D4tum: NADB.J {C!!RS} 4.tlll.BC.1.U\.fiO UTll ZMt: 10 U7JINtrWng:S4520/Jl.()67 %:t=:~:~BJ~99M071 20 19 18 1198 Avenue 8 7 6 ~ 5 ~ ::S ~ 4 J 2 9 APPENDIX D
1104TO: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: March 1, 2022 FILE NO: 2022-028-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C o W SUBJECT: First Reading Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7828-2022 11758 221 Street & 22119, 22127, 22131, 22147, 22155, and 22173 Cliff Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This report presents Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7828-2022 (Appendix A), to redesignate 11758 221 Street, and 22119, 22127, 22131, 22147, and 22155 Cliff Avenue from Single-Family Residential to Low Rise Apartment, and 22173 Cliff Avenue from Single-Family Residential to Town Centre Commercial, for Council consideration of first reading. This Official Community Plan Amendment is in response to Council direction from the December 14, 2021 Council meeting, where staff were directed to review the land use of properties adjacent to the Lougheed Transit Corridor Area Plan to ensure appropriate transitional land uses are able to be considered. The Cliff Avenue properties were specifically identified for re-designation at that meeting. In addition to the redesignation of the Cliff Avenue properties, Council could direct staff to also take a closer look at the land uses for the properties currently designated as single family along Selkirk and 119 Avenue (Appendix D). The following additional recommendation has been included for Council consideration: That staff review the land use designations for the single-family designated properties along Selkirk Avenue and 119 Avenue within the Town Centre Area Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That in respect of Section 4 75 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvement District Boards, and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies; and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the referral process, and early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City's website; 2. That Official Community Plan Policy Amending Bylaw No. 7828-2022 be given first reading; and further 3. That staff review the land use designations for the single family designated properties along Selkirk Avenue and 119 Avenue within the Town Centre Area Plan. Doc#3012767 Page 1 of 6
1.0 CONTEXT: 1.1 Official Community Plan and Area Plans The Town Centre Area Plan (TCAP) was adopted in 2008 with a vision for creating more density, mixed-uses, and green space, while creating a pedestrian-oriented environment. With this Plan in place, the Town Centre of Maple Ridge has been experiencing a significant amount of redevelopment and change over the past five to ten years. Maple Ridge Council has recognized this growth and wants to ensure that the evolution of the Town Centre continues to be positive and leads to greater vibrancy within this core part of the community. The Town Centre Area Plan came together with the understanding that 'commercial follows rooftops' and as such, the attraction and development of residential buildings will be followed by commercial development and business growth. A fundamental element to a successful business area is the importance of relevant, vibrant, and safe destinations that appeal to visitors and residents during the day and into the night. Ultimately, the goals of the TCAP reinforce, support and encourage the development of these elements. Complementing the policies and objectives of the TCAP, the Lougheed Transit Corridor Study was initiated in September 2018 with an aim to review existing Official Community Plan (OCP) designations and policies for the lands west of the TCAP, running along Lougheed Highway and Dewdney Trunk Road from approximately 222 Street to 200 Street, and create a more detailed land use plan to guide future development in this area. The Lougheed Transit Corridor Concept Plan was endorsed at the November 10, 2020 Council Workshop meeting. At the December 14, 2021 Council meeting, the Lougheed Transit Corridor Area Plan and Development Permit Guidelines received first reading, while noting that some of the land uses adjacent to the Transit Corridor Area Plan should be reviewed, in order to ensure appropriate transitional land uses are considered. 1.2 Recent Initiatives Table 1 below identifies recent presentations to Council as well as initiatives that have been undertaken in the Town Centre Area: Table 1 -Recent Council Presentations regarding the Town Centre Area Plan Date Initiative Outcome September 10, 2019 Presentation of TCAP and recent Council expressed interest in a 2020 development at Council Town Centre Visioning Process. Workshop March 31, 2020 Council endorsed scope of work Engagement process ran during the for the TCAP Visioning process summer and fall of 2020. February 23, 2021 Engagement outcomes Council directed staff to assess the presented to Council recommendations in the outcomes report to advance ideas for ways to foster an inclusive, vibrant, and welcoming Town Centre. February 8, 2022 Port Haney Land Use Policy Council directed staff to review and Review update the Town Centre Area Plan, Development Permit Guidelines, and Zones to reflect newer heights, uses and reinforce Port Haney's roots and heritage. Doc#3012767 Page 2 of 6
In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, should Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7828-2022 receive first reading, staff will submit referral notices to the following agencies regarding the proposed re-designation of the Cliff Avenue properties: Metro Vancouver, School District No. 42, local First Nations, Translink, and Ministry of Transportation. In addition, should Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7828-2022 receive first reading, staff will host a virtual open house for the community, which will be advertised through the newspaper and the City's Social Media accounts. Cliff Avenue Property Owners have been notified of Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7828-2022 via mail-out. 3.0 STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT Implementing strategic plans related to local infrastructure and the economy is a Council priority, as established under the Growth pillar of the 2019-2022 City of Maple Ridge Strategic Plan. Additional outcomes of work in the Town Centre align with the Community Safety, Community Pride & Spirit, and Natural Environment (Green Infrastructure) pillars of Council's Strategic Plan. 4.0 POLICY IMPLICATIONS The Official Community Plan and Town Centre Area Plan establish goals, objectives and policies in support of the development of a complete community that is vibrant, healthy and safe. 5.0 INTERDEPARTMENTAL IMPLICATIONS Continuing to implement the Town Centre Area Plan is anticipated to create synergies with the work that is underway on the Community Social Safety Initiative (particularly with implementation of the Action Plan, involving several City departments and the RCMP), as well anticipated outcomes from the Strategic Transportation Plan and the Economic Development Strategy. 6.0 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The re-designation of the Cliff Avenue Properties is considered a found milestone for the Planning Department, however the work is accommodated for in the general 2022 Planning Department Budget. Doc#3012767 Page 5 of 6
CONCLUSION: This report presents Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7828-2022, to redesignate 11758 221 Street & 22119, 22127, 22131, 22147, and 22155 Cliff Avenue to Apartment (Low Rise) and 22173 Cliff Avenue to Town Centre Commercial, for first reading. An additional recommendation that staff review land use designations for the single-family designated properties along Selkirk Avenue and 119 Avenue within the Town Centre Area Plan is also provided for Council consideration. "Original signed by Amanda Grochowich" Prepared by: Amanda Grochowich, MCIP, RPP Planner 2 "Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM, Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A-Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7828-2022 Appendix B -Cliff Avenue Properties Current Land Use Designation Map Appendix C -Cliff Avenue Properties Proposed Land Use Designation Map Appendix D -Selkirk Avenue & 119 Avenue Properties Current Land Use Designation Map Doc#3012767 Page 6 of 6
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7828-2022 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 APPENDIX A WHEREAS Section 4 77 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule "B" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7828-2022". 2. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for those parcels of land and premises known and described as: Lot 35 District Lot 397 New Westminster District Plan 9218; Lot 36 District Lot 397 New Westminster District Plan 9218; Lot 37 District Lot 397 New Westminster District Plan 9218; Lot 38 District Lot 397 New Westminster District Plan 9218; Lot 39 District Lot 397 New Westminster District Plan 9218; Lot 40 District Lot 397 New Westminster District Plan 9218; Lot 41 District Lot 397 New Westminster District Plan 9218; and Lot 42 District Lot 397 New Westminster District Plan 9218 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1052, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby designated/amended as shown. 3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of READ a second time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,20. ,20 ,20 ,20 ,20 CORPORATE OFFICER
1131
Comprehensive stormwater management is a suite of master plans that start at the watershed, or ISMP level and then cascade down through to catchment plans, capacity analysis of built drainage infrastructure, implementation plans and funding strategies. During the IMSP discussions, staff have noted Council's queries and will be sure to address them as further stormwater management work progresses. The ISMP documents are very extensive and contain a significant amount of technical data and analysis. The intent of this report is to seek Council's endorsement-in-principle for the ISMPs that will enable staff to move on to the more detailed catchment and sub-catchment studies that will in turn be brought to Council and provide more detailed direction for management of stormwater throughout the municipality. Further, during previous Council discussions, questions were raised regarding the funding commitments of each plan. Overall, the ISMPs identify investments of approximately $2-3M in planning, policy and monitoring work and an initial $60M to address infrastructure deficiencies, support growth and address the impacts of climate change. Project recommendations are detailed further within the consultant reports. b) Strategic Alignment: Integrated stormwater management planning supports Council's strategic priorities of Community Safety, Inter-Government Relations and Growth and Natural Environment. The ISMP also fulfills a directive of the Official Community Plan. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: The improvements to watershed health and drainage infrastructure recommended in the ISMP will benefit the community. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Implementing the recommendations of the ISMPs will affect Finance, Engineering, Engineering Operations, Parks & Facilities, Environmental Planning, Community Planning and Building. The implications for these areas will be varied, including providing internal stakeholder feedback on proposed solutions, budgeting, monitoring, analysis, planning, community consultation, construction and maintenance work. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Both ISMPs recommend significant investments in stormwater management. These recommendations require further synthesis and prioritization. In general, there are elements which can be incorporated into the 2022-2026 Business and Capital Plans; however, the majority of investments identified require further evaluation and prioritization. Balancing the needs of existing infrastructure replacement with the desire for service level enhancements (new infrastructure) will also be required. Sub-watershed Drainage Master Plans are necessary to validate the assumptions of the ISMP model, study overland flow paths and analyze pipes smaller than 400mm or 16". The first of these plans were recently initiated in the Eagle Avenue and Gee Street neighbourhood (northeast of Dewdney Trunk Road and 228 Street) and the Lower Hammond Neighbourhood. Doc#3021010 Page 3 of 4
CONCLUSION:
This report requests Council endorsement in principle for the South Alouette and Kanaka Creek
Integrated Stormwater Management Plan and the Blaney, North Alouette, and Fraser River Integrated
Stormwater Management Plan. This will allow the City to meet its commitment to the Minister of
Environment through the Metro Vancouver Liquid Waste Management Plan and allow staff to proceed
with sub-watershed Drainage Master Plans. As sub-watershed Drainage Master Plans progress, staff
will review infrastructure grant opportunities and proceed with development of a funding strategy for
drainage infrastructure investments.
Prepared by: Forrest Smith, P.Eng. o;d'o�oirg
Approved by: David Pollock, P.Eng.
General Manager Engineering Services
�'---==-----, Concurrence: Scott Hartman
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachments:
(A)Integrated Stormwater Management Plans Update, October 12, 2021 Workshop
ISMP South Alouette and Kanaka Creek - September, 2021
ISMP Blaney, North Alouette, and Fraser River
(B)Integrated Stormwater Management Plans - Consultants' Presentations, October 26, 2021Workshop
Doc#3021010 Page 4 of 4
To assess the system under future conditions, consideration was given to the impact of climate change on the performance of stormwater infrastructure. Current rainfall intensities were scaled by both 10% and 20%. This is aligned with the most recent climate projection data identifying the potential for a 20% increase by 2050. Despite the primary focus of climate change increasing precipitation, the impacts will also extend to heat, drought and wind. This will inevitably impact summer base flows in creeks and further emphasizes the importance of groundwater recharge and tree canopy protection. Overall, the ISMPs identify investments of approximately $2-3M in planning, policy and monitoring work and an initial $60M to address infrastructure deficiencies, support growth and the address the impacts of climate change. Further, the ISMPs include recommendations to review the City's tiered drainage criteria, and proposed a multitude of projects to promote and protect watershed health. In addition to these recommendations, and to fulfil provincial requirements, a monitoring and adaptive management framework is required. Tracking watershed health trends over time through repeat sampling allows for regular feedback on the efficacy of measures implemented and provides opportunities for course-corrections over time. Advancing the recommendations of the ISM P to address current and emerging challenges will require ongoing effort and funding. The financial and business planning implications associated with the ISMP's recommendations are provided in Section E, below. Consultation and Feedback: The ISMP benefited from public and various stakeholder feedback throughout the process. This feedback was incorporated where possible, thereby strengthening connections between the City, community and other government agencies. A summary of the feedback received is provided below. Public Survey An online public survey was conducted for both ISMPs over the course of one month in 2019. Large advertisements for the survey were published in two issues of the Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows News, Face book posts, the front-page City Spotlight section of the City's website and the Maple Ridge This Week newsletter via a mailing list with 181 subscribers. The outcomes of the surveys are documented in the ISMP reports and responses are included as Attachment Band N to this report. Review by Environmental Advisory Committee The City's Environmental Advisory Committee received both ISMP drafts along with presentations from the City's consultants. The Committee provided their support for both ISMPs. Participation from Internal Stakeholders . Internal stakeholders provided feedback on the draft IS MPs and participated in meetings with external stakeholders. Staff from Corporate Communications, Finance, Engineering, Engineering Operations, Parks & Facilities, Environmental Planning, Community Planning and Building all contributed to the process. Doc#2882011 Page 4of 7
Participation from External Stakeholders The draft ISMPs were shared with external stakeholders identified below, along with an invitation to provide input and feedback. A virtual presentation was also offered to all stakeholders including options for communication by telephone or email exchange. Most groups met with the City and provided feedback on the report. • Agricultural Land Commission • Alouette River Management Society • Alouette Valley Association • BC Conservation Foundation -WildSafeBC • BC Hydro • BC Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries • BC Ministry of Environment • BC Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations & Rural Development • BC Parks • City of Pitt Meadows • D.K. Bowins & Associates Inc. • Fisheries and Oceans Canada • Kanaka Education & Environmental Partnership Society • Katzie First Nation • Kwantlen First Nation • Metro Vancouver Regional Parks • Morningstar Homes e Thornhill Aquifer Protection Society • UBC Malcolm Knapp Research Forest • Wayne Stephen Bissky Architecture Urban Design Incorporated A summary of stakeholder feedback and discussions is provided in Attachments C and Oto this report. Where received, specific stakeholder feedback is included in Attachments D to L and Attachments P to V to this report. b) Strategic Alignment: Integrated stormwater management planning supports Council's strategic priorities of Community Safety, Inter-Government Relations and Growth and Natural Environment. The ISM Palso fulfills a directive of the Official Community Plan. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: The improvements to watershed health and drainage infrastructure recommended in the ISMP will benefit the community. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Implementing the recommendations of the ISMPs will affect Finance, Engineering, Engineering Operations, Parks & Facilities, Environmental Planning, Community Planning and Building. The implications for these areas will be varied, including providing internal stakeholder feedback on proposed solutions, budgeting, monitoring, analysis, planning, community consultation, construction and maintenance work. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Both ISMPs recommend significant investments in stormwater management. These recommendations require further synthesis and prioritization. Doc:Ji:2882011 Page 5 of 7 -----·-:-·--·'
. -.-,~,.,:.·, . . -Attachments: South Alouette River and Kanaka Creek Watersheds (A) Integrated Stormwater Management Plan -South Alouette & Kanaka Creek -Executive Summary Report, September 2021 (8) Public Survey Results (C) External Stakeholder Feedback Summary (D) Letter from Agricultural Land Commission (E) Letter from Alouette River Management Society (F) Letter from Alouette Valley Association (G) Letter from BC Conservation Foundation -WildSafeBC (H) Letter from BC Ministry of Environment & Climate Change Strategy (I) Letter from BC Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations & Rural Development (J) Letter from Kanaka Education & Environmental Partnership (K) Email from Thornhill Aquifer Protection Society (L) Email from UBC Malcolm Knapp Research Forest North Alouette River, Blaney Creek and Fraser River Watersheds (M) Integrated Stormwater Management Plan -Blaney, North Alouette, and Fraser River -Executive Summary Report, September 2021 (N) Public Survey Results (0) External Stakeholder Feedback Summary (P) Letter from Agricultural Land Commission (Q) Letter from Alouette River Management Society (R) Letter from Alouette Valley Association (S) Letter from BC Conservation Foundation -WildSafeBC (T) Letter from BC Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations & Rural Development (U) Email from Morningstar Homes (V) Emails from UBC Malcolm Knapp Research Forest Doc#2882011 Page 7 of7
presentations and endorsement discussions to the October 26, 2021 meeting to allow additional time for Council's review. At the October 12, 2021 workshop, Council identified questions and comments regarding the lSMPs, some of which were responded to directly at the time, and others which required further consideration prior to response. These questions and comments are detailed below. The October 26, 2021 presentations are an opportunity to summarize and respond to the questions and comments from October 12, 2021, and provide an opportunity for the project consultants to present directly to Council and field any additional questions Council may have on the technical aspects of their respective reports. Council Question/Comments: 1. How was feedback from Alouette River Management Society (ARMS) incorporated into the documents? Feedback from ARMS can be summarized into two categories, technical and process related. Technical feedback has been included where possible, however, some of the process related feedback was more challenging to incorporate as it is governed through the development approval process. Overall, ARMS was supportive of the ISMPs and provided meaningful constructive criticism which made a positive difference. 2. What will the ISMP communications strategy be? Once the lSMPs have been endorsed, staff will work to develop a targeted communications strategy to support the required investments. These communication efforts will be aligned with sub-watershed Drainage Master Plan work scheduled to commence in 2022. 3. How will the infrastructure investments be funded? Funding requirements can be summarized into two general categories, infrastructure replacement due to condition or climate requirements and infrastructure replacement as a result of growth. Infrastructure replacement due to condition or climate requirements is funded through infrastructure replacement funding and the drainage levy; whereas, Infrastructure replacement due to growth is funded through development cost charges. These two replacement drivers can also apply to the same project, when this occurs, the funds are allocated proportionally. Further, staff will develop a funding strategy for Council's consideration. 4. When did the Province first request ISMPS from municipalities? In 2001, Metro Vancouver and its members developed an adopted a Liquid Waste Management Plan. As part of this Plan, Metro Vancouver member municipalities committed to completing ISMPs for all urban and semi-urban watersheds by the end of 2014. This deadline was subsequently extended to the end of 2016, by the Minister of Environment, subject to the development of an acceptable ISMP Adaptive Management Framework. Given the size, scope and complexity of ISMP development, some member municipalities are still working to meet these commitments. In general, lessons learned over the past 20 years have helped improve the planning process and has lead to stronger, more involved plans. Doc#2891159 Page 2 of 6
5. What storm water regulations guide ISMP development? Stormwater management and policy development is a municipal responsibility and predominately managed through the City's Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 4800-1993 and the corresponding Design Criteria Manual. In addition, the following and several other bylaws and Acts also provide direction on stormwater management: • Metro Vancouver's Integrated Liquid Waste Management Plan • Local Government Act • Province of BC -Water Sustainability Act • BC Building Code • Government of Canada -Fisheries Act 6. How will stormwater management be considered during infill construction? Further investigation into the effectiveness of the City's tiered drainage criteria is essential to understand how effectively small lots are controlling their storm water. This review is scheduled to progress next year. 7. Would like to see an aggressive infrastructure investment in green stormwater infrastructure. The Planning Department is undertaking a Green Infrastructure Management Strategy that will encompass stormwater. This initiative is currently under development. 8. How will we manage stormwater connections in the Fraser River Escarpment? The Fraser River Escarpment Risk Assessment is ongoing. Staff recommend a strategic plan to manage stormwater connections follow the completion of that work. 9. Given the infrastructure investment identified in the ISMPs will the City be reviewing the drainage levy? Yes, the drainage levy will be reviewed; however, this work is scheduled to align with the development of a funding strategy. 10. Were First Nations invited to participate in the ISMPs? Yes, staff reached out on a number of occasions in various formats; unfortunately, given competing demands, Katzie First Nation and Kwantlen First Nation were unable to respond to consultation opportunities. 11. How do we maintain environmental protection while enclosing ditch networks and will future sub-watershed Drainage Master Plans address piped networks versus open ditch treatments? Sub-watershed Master Drainage Plans will allow for a more detailed analysis of existing infrastructure and will provide recommendations based on a number of factors including environmen_tal protection. Doc#2891159 Page 3 of6
12. Does the ISMP work provide an opportunity to provide leadership within the region regarding stormwater management practices, specifically how they relate to green infrastructure? The ISMPs identified Maple Ridge as an early adopter of policy and criteria that has improved sustainable development practices while supporting community growth. Key successes achieved to date have been progressive watercourse setbacks and designation of environmentally sensitive protection areas, and the formation of three-tiered rainwater management criteria. While considered progressive, further investigation into the effectiveness of the criteria is recommended. As part of this work, green infrastructure guidelines and design criteria will be considered as sub-watershed Drainage Master Plans are advanced. 13. Will there be consultation with the Development Community? Members of the development community were engaged as part of the ISMP process, and consultants have taken their feedback into account when developing the ISMPs. There will be further opportunities for consultation as part of a review of the tiered drainage design criteria. 14. Should we be revising our DCCs to accommodate future stormwater infrastructure requirements? Yes, projects included within the drainage Development Cost Charge portfolio will be reviewed and refined as sub-watershed Drainage Master Plans are completed. 15. Are there any grant opportunities that we can proceed with now as we move forward with the sub-watershed Drainage Master Plans? Yes, staff will monitor available grant prospects and bring forward opportunities for Council's consideration as they become available. 16. Will the ISMPs be integrated into the Alouette River and current water use plan? In regard to BC Hydro's Water Use Plan Order and Order Review, the City has confirmed interest and availability to participate as a stakeholder in the process. 17. What drove stormwater management standards prior to the ISMPs? Integrated Stormwater Management has been a concept within the region since 2001, essentially building upon best management practices available at the time. Since then, municipalities have incorporated advancements in adaptive management frameworks and integration of green infrastructure in design in Integrated Stormwater Management Planning. 18. How do we provide equity across the City for both services and taxation? Our current obligation to provide existing services is our core focus. Layering on new infrastructure on top of these commitments will require strategic planning. This planning will occur as the Strategic Transportation Plan and sub-watershed Drainage Master Plans are finalized. Staff will insure the equitable distribution forms part of the evaluation. Doc#2891159 Page4of6
19. Would like to see a video similar to the Budget and Property Tax Bill video recently produced by the finance team. Staff will ensure this is considered in upcoming work. 20. Would like to make sure stormwater management for Thornhill is considered in upcoming servicing review. Staff will ensure this is considered following the initial area planning exercises for the Thornhill Urban Reserve. b) Strategic Alignment: Integrated stormwater management planning supports Council's strategic priorities of Community Safety, Inter-Government Relations, Growth and Natural Environment. The ISMP also fulfills a directive of the Official Community Plan. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: The improvements to watershed health and drainage infrastructure recommended in the ISMP will benefit the community. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Implementing the recommendations of the ISMPs will affect Finance, Engineering, Engineering Operations, Parks & Facilities, Environmental Planning, Community Planning and Building. The implications for these areas will be varied, including providing internal stakeholder feedback on proposed solutions, budgeting, monitoring, analysis, planning, community consultation, construction and maintenance work. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Both ISMPs recommend significant investments in stormwater management. These recommendations require further synthesis and prioritization. In general, there are elements which can be incorporated into the 2022-2026 Business and Capital Plans; however, the majority of investments identified require further evaluation and prioritization. Balancing the needs of existing infrastructure replacement with the desire for service level enhancements (new infrastructure) will also be required. Sub-watershed Drainage Master Plans are necessary to validate the assumptions of the ISMP model, study overland flow paths and analyze pipes smaller than 400mm or 16". The first of these plans was recently initiated in the Eagle Avenue and Gee Street neighbourhood (northeast of Dewdney Trunk Road and 228 Street) and the Lower Hammond Neighbourhood is scheduled to commence in 2022. Sub-watershed Drainage Master Plans, in conjunction with the Fraser River Escarpment Risk Analysis and the ISMP work completed to date will inform the cumulative scope of existing drainage infrastructure improvements required. Once determined, staff will review the available funding options for Council's consideration. Doc#2891159 Page 5 of 6