HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-05-24 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdf COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
City of Maple Ridge
May 24, 2022
7:00 p.m.
Virtual Online Meeting including Council Chambers
Meeting Decorum:
Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at Council meetings
which affect many people’s lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council
Meeting deserves. Commentary and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the
Council Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person’s behavior will be reprimanded. The
meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge.
Note: This Agenda is also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or
resolutions. This is the venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution.
For virtual public participation during Public Question Period register by going to
www.mapleridge.ca/640/Council-Meetings and clicking on the meeting date
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
400 ADOPTION OF MINUTES
401 Minutes - May 10, 2022
500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
600 DELEGATIONS
700 CONSENT AGENDA
701 Minutes
701.1 Development Agreements Committee:
• May 11, 2022
Reports702
• May 18, 2022
Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
Page 2 of 8
702.1 Disbursements for the month ended April 30, 2022
702.2 Council Expenses recorded to April 30, 2022
702.3 Festival Grant Program Recommendations - Intake One 2022
703
704
Correspondence
Release of Items from Closed Council Status
Recommendation to Receive Items on Consent705
800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
801 Notice of Motion
With the currently prohibitive housing costs and the high rate of inflation,
first time home buyers are severely disadvantaged;
Recognizing the need to provide creative solutions to the housing crisis
facing our residents and continue to grow our local economy;
Therefore, to ensure the proper policy framework is in place be it resolved
that Council direct staff to review the housing policy and bring forward
amendments to allow a rent-to-own scheme focusing primarily on
townhouses and apartments in the City of Maple Ridge.
900 CORRESPONDENCE
1000 BYLAWS
For Third Reading
Note: Item 1001 - 1007 from the Public Hearing of May 17, 2022
1001 2016-195-CP, Employment Lands: Re-designation of the Yennadon
Lands to Industrial (Employment Park Category)
Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
Page 3 of 8
1001.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021
To amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 to:
• introduce a new category “Employment Park” to the existing Industrial
land use designation;
• amend Employment Policy (6-44) to reflect the Yennadon Lands
Employment Park;
• amend Section 6.4 to include the Employment Park policy;
• introduce the Yennadon Lands Employment Park Development Permit
Area Guidelines; and
• to amend the Zoning Matrix to include the Employment Park Land Use
Category and the new M-7 (Employment Park Industrial) zone.
1001.2 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021
To amend the Urban Area Boundary to include the Yennadon Lands in
their entirety, and to re-designate lands from Agriculture to Industrial and
Conservation.
1001.3 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7838-2022
To re-designate lands from Agricultural to Industrial.
1002 2020-421-RZ, 12026 Dunbar Street and 22137 Dewdney Trunk Road
1002.1 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7690-2020
To rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to
C-3 (Town Centre Commercial).
1003 2018-429-RZ, 11052 240 Street
1003.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7514-2018
To re-designate a portion of the subject property from Low/Medium
Density Residential to Conservation.
1003.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7515-2018
To rezone a portion of the subject property from RS-3 (Single Detached
Rural Residential) to R-3 (Single Detached (Intensive) Urban Residential).
Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
Page 4 of 8
1004 2019-001-RZ, 24440 128 Avenue
1004.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7832-2022
To re-designate a portion of the subject property from Suburban
Residential to Conservation.
1004.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7528-2019
To rezone a portion of the subject property from RS-3 (Single Detached
Rural Residential) to RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential).
1005 2020-250-RZ, 23939 Fern Crescent
1005.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7691-2020
To re-designate a portion of the subject property from Low Density Urban
to Conservation.
1005.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7692-2020
To rezone a portion of the subject property from RS-2 (Single Detached
Suburban Residential) to RS-1b (Single Detached (Medium Density)
Residential).
1006 2021-131-RZ, 23103 136 Avenue
1006.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7839-2022
1006.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7725-2021
To rezone a portion of the subject property from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to
1007
R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential).
2021- 244- RZ, 13917 & 13992 Silver Valley Road and 13897 &
13960 232 Street
1007.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7846-2022
To re-designate portions of the subject properties from Eco Cluster to
Conservation.
Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
Page 5 of 8
1007.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7768-2021
To rezone portions of the subject properties from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural
Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) and
R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential).
1008
To update references and public facing documentation.
1100 COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The items in the “Committee Reports and Recommendations” category are staff reports
presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting, typically a week prior, to provide
Council with an opportunity to ask staff detailed questions. The items are now before the
regular Council Meeting for debate and vote. Both meetings are open to the public.
The reports are not reprinted again in hard copy, however; they can be found in the
electronic agenda or in the Committee of the Whole agenda package dated accordingly.
Planning and Development Services
1101 2020-237-RZ, 11070 Lockwood Street and 24984, 25024 & 25038 112
Avenue, RS-3 to R-1 and RM-1
Staff report dated May 17, 2022, recommending that Zone Amending Bylaw No.
7844-2022 to rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to R-1
(Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) and RM-1 (Low Density
Townhouse Residential) to permit a future subdivision of approximately 38
single-family lots and a 102 townhouse unit development be given first reading
and that the applicant provide further information as described in the report.
2019-402-RZ, 9450 287 Street
1008.1 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7833-2022
To discharge the Land Use Contract from the subject property.
For Adoption
1009 Maple Ridge Fees & Charges Amending Bylaw No. 7850-2022
To provide greater clarity to the public on municipal fees and to ensure rate alignment with market levels.
1010 Maple Ridge Tree Protection & Management Amending Bylaw No. 7851-2022
For Third Reading and Adoption
Note: Item 1008 is from the April 12, 2022 Council Meeting. A Public Hearing was waived
in accordance with Section 464(2) of the Local Government Act.
Staff report dated May 24, 2022, recommending Zone Amending Bylaw No.
7833-2022 be given third reading and be adopted.
Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
Page 6 of 8
1102 2018-289-RZ, 10309 & 10337 240 Street and 10320 & 10350 Slatford Place
Staff report dated May 17, 2022, recommending that Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7542-2019 be given first and second
reading and forwarded to Public Hearing and that Zone Amending Bylaw
No. 7543-2019 as amended, to rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural
Residential) and RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to
RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit a future 102-unit townhouse
development be given second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing.
1103 2018-458-RZ, 11310 Kingston Street, RS-3 to M-3
Staff report dated May 17, 2022, recommending that Zone Amending Bylaw
No. 7522-2018 to rezone from RS-3 (Singe Detached Rural Residential) to M-3
(Business Park Industrial) to permit a future subdivision of approximately seven
industrial park lots be given second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing.
1104 2018-489-RZ, 20278 and 20292 Patterson Avenue, RS-1 to RM-2
Staff report dated May 17, 2022, recommending that Zone Amending Bylaw No.
7523-2018 to rezone from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RM-2
(Medium Density Residential) to permit a future four-storey apartment building,
with approximately 88 units be given second reading and forwarded to Public
Hearing.
1105 2022-159-RZ, 21973 132 Avenue, Termination and Replacement of
Land Use Contract
Staff report dated May 17, 2022, recommending that Zone Amending Bylaw No.
7853-2022, to rezone from LUC (Land Use Contract) to a new zone CD-1-22
(Equestrian Facility and Restaurant), be given first and second reading and
forwarded to Public Hearing.
1106 2019-244-RZ, 12155 Edge Street, Housing Agreement Bylaw
Staff report dated May 17, 2022, recommending that Housing Agreement Bylaw
No. 7855-2022, to secure 209 units in the five-storey apartment building as
market rental units, be give first, second and third reading.
1107 2022-014-DVP, 20425 Hampton Street
Staff report dated May 17, 2022, recommending that the Corporate Officer be
authorized to sign and seal 2022-014-DVP to increase the maximum principal
building height and that a restrictive covenant be authorized to be registered on
title to prohibit the construction of a Secondary Suite.
Engineering Services
Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
Page 7 of 8
1131 Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement for Major
Emergencies
Staff report dated May 17, 2022, recommending that the City enter into the
modified Metro Vancouver Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement.
Corporate Services
Parks, Recreation and Culture
Other Committee Issues
Administration (including Fire and Police)
1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
1400 PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD
1500 MAYOR AND COUNCILLOR REPORTS
1600 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING
1700 ADJOURNMENT
Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
Page 8 of 8
PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD
The purpose of Public Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions
of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing bylaws which
have not yet reached conclusion.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second opportunity is permitted if
no one else is waiting to participate. Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not
to individual members of Council. The total session is limited to 15 minutes.
Please check our website for the latest updates on how the City is facilitating public participation in
response to evolving Provincial Public Health Orders:
https://www.mapleridge.ca/2408/COVID-19-lnformation
We encourage the public to watch the video recording of the meeting via live stream or any time
after the meeting via
http://media.mapleridge.ca/Mediasite/Showcase.
Using Zoom, input from the public during Public Question Period is being facilitated via email to
clerks@mapleridge.ca and/or via the raised hand function through the Zoom meeting. For virtual
public participation during Public Question Period please join the meeting by clicking on the date of
the meeting at https://www.mapleridge.ca/640/Council-Meetings. When the meeting reaches Public
Question Period, please raise your virtual hand to indicate you would like to speak.
Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the information
required to provide a complete and accurate response.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk’s Department at 604-463-5221 or
clerks@mapleridge.ca Mayor and Council at
mayorcouncilandcaol@mapleridge.ca
May 19, 2022
May 20, 2022
400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
400
401
Council Meeting Minutes May 10, 2022 Page 2 of 9 400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 401 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of April 26, 2022 R/2022-CM-138 It was moved and seconded That the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of April 26, 2022 be adopted as circulated. CARRIED 402 Report of Public Hearing -April 19, 2022 R/2022-CM-139 It was moved and seconded That the Report of Public Hearing of April 19, 2022 be adopted as circulated. CARRIED 500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL-Nil 600 DELEGATIONS -Nil 700 ITEMS ON CONSENT 701 Minutes 701.1 Meetings of the Development Agreements Committee • April 27, 2022 702 Reports 702.1 Quarter 1, 2022 Corporate Update Staff report dated May 10, 2022 providing a corporate update for the first quarter of 2022. 702.2 Quarter 1, 2022 Financial Update Staff report dated May 10, 2022 providing a financial update for the first quarter of 2022. 704 Re/ease of Items from Closed Council Status From the April 19, 2022 Closed Council Meeting be released from Closed Council status:
Council Meeting Minutes May 10, 2022 Page 3 of 9 • Item 4.1 -Albion Dyking District and Maple Ridge Road 13 Dyking District Update 705 Recommendation to Receive Items on Consent R/2022-CM-140 It was moved and seconded That Item 1001 be removed from the Consent Agenda and that the remaining items on the Consent Agenda of the May 10, 2022 Council Meeting be received into the record. CARRIED 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS -Nil 900 CORRESPONDENCE -Nil 1000 BYLAWS Bylaws for Adoption 1001 Council Procedure Bylaw No. 7799-2021 A bylaw to provide permanent options to hold Council meetings and Public Hearings electronically and guidance on procedural matters dealing with late attendance by Members and retention of recordings. R/2022-CM-141 It was moved and seconded That Council Procedure Bylaw No. 7799-2021 be adopted. CARRIED Councillors Robson and Yousef opposed 1002 2022-2026 Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7848-2022 A bylaw to update the financial plan to reflect information received since the Plan's adoption in December 2021. R/2022-CM-142 It was moved and seconded 2022-2026 Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7848-2022 be adopted. CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes May 10, 2022 Page 4 of 9 1003 2022 Property Tax Rates Bylaw No. 7849-2022 A bylaw to establish property tax rates for Municipal and Regional District purposes for the year 2022. R/2022-CM-143 It was moved and seconded 2022-2026 Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7848-2022 be adopted. CARRIED 1004 Recycling Charges Amending Bylaw No. 7842-2022 A bylaw to update the annual regular rate increases. R/2022-CM-144 It was moved and seconded Recycling Charges Amending Bylaw No. 7842-2022 be adopted. CARRIED 1005 Maple Ridge Albion Dyking District Tax Rates Bylaw No. 7835-2022 A bylaw to establish a tax rate in order to impose rates for the payment of dyke improvements, maintenance and related costs. R/2022-CM-145 It was moved and seconded Maple Ridge Albion Dyking District Tax Rates Bylaw No. 7835-2022 be adopted. CARRIED 1006 Maple Ridge Road 13 Dyking District Tax Rates Bylaw No. 7836-2022 A bylaw to establish a tax rate in order to impose rates for the payment of dyke improvements, maintenance, and related costs. R/2022-CM-146 It was moved and seconded Maple Ridge Road 13 Dyking District Tax Rates Bylaw No. 7836-2022 be adopted. CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes May 10, 2022 Page 5 of 9 1100 REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Planning and Development Services 1101 2022-034-RZ, 11956, 11946, 11936 & 11926 236 Street and 23638 Dewdney Trunk Road, RS-3 to RM-1 and R-2 Staff report dated May 3, 2022, recommending that Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7852-2022 to rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential), to permit the future construction of 52 townhomes and three single-family lots, be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in the report. R/2022-CM-14 7 It was moved and seconded That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7852-2022 be given first reading; and further That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B to E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with information required for a Subdivision application. CARRIED 1102 2021-323-RZ, 23348 141 Avenue, RS-3 to R-1 and R-2 Staff report dated May 3, 2022, recommending that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7847-2022 be given first and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing and that Zone Amending-Bylaw No. 777 4-2021 to rezone from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) and R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential), to permit a future subdivision of approximately 23 single-family lots and to revise the boundaries of land use designation, be given second reading as amended and forwarded to Public Hearing. R/2022-CM-148 It was moved and seconded 1. That, in accordance with Section 4 75 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 784 7-2022 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a Development Information Meeting (DIM), and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw; 2. That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 784 7-2022 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
Council Meeting Minutes May 10, 2022 Page 6 of 9 3. That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 784 7-2022 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 784 7-2022 be given first and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing; 5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 777 4-2021 be given second reading as amended, and forwarded to Public Hearing; 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule "A" Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A -Silver Valley, Figure 2 -Land Use Plan, Figure 3A-B1aney Haney and Figure 4 -Trails/ Open Space; iii) Road dedication as required; iv) Park dedication as required, including construction of multi-purpose trails and removal of all debris and garbage from park land; v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant prohibiting building or subdivision and release of liability until a municipal water system is installed to service the subject properties to the satisfaction of the City; vii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the protection of the Environmentally Sensitive areas (wetlands) on the subject property; viii) Registration of a Statutory Right-of-Way plan and agreement for City infrastructure; ix) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant Tree Protection and Stormwater Management; x) In addition to the Ministry of Environment Site Disclosure Statement, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; and xi) That a voluntary contribution be provided in keeping with the Council Policy 6.31 with regards to Community Amenity Contributions applicable at the time of third reading of this application. CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes May 10, 2022 Page 7 of 9 1103 2020-168-RZ, 13960 232 Street, 13897 and 14027 Silver Valley Road, Alternate Approval Process for Park Use Staff report dated May 3, 2022, recommending that staff develop a Park Use Bylaw to permit a City storm sewer line in Dedicated Park Land located at Silver Valley Road (Plan BCP 46658 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District) and that staff commence public engagement through the Alternative Approval Process. R/2022-CM-149 It was moved and seconded 1. That staff develop a Park Use Bylaw to permit a City storm sewer line in Dedicated Park Land located at Silver Valley Road (Plan BCP 46658 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District); and further 2. That staff commence public engagement through the Alternative Approval Process for the proposed Park Use Bylaw to permit a City storm sewer line in Dedicated Park Land located at Silver Valley Road (Plan BCP 46658 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District), subject to the compliance with the notice provisions of Sections 27, 86 and 94 of the Community Charter, S.B.C., 2003, c.26. CARRIED Engineering Services 1131 Award of Contract ITT-EN22-3: 236 Street Water Pump Station Replacement Staff report dated May 3, 2022, recommending that Council approve the award to Drake Excavating (2016) Ltd., a contract contingency, an increase to the existing Stantec Consulting Ltd. contract for Engineering Design Services for the 236 Street Water Pump Station Replacement, and that the Financial Plan be amended to fund this project from the Water Revenue Fund and Development Cost Charges. R/2022-CM-150 It was moved and seconded 1. That Contract ITI-EN22-3: 236 Street Water Pump Station Replacement be awarded to Drake Excavating (2016) Ltd. in the amount of $5,352,110.00 excluding taxes; and 2. That a contract contingency of $535,000.00 be approved to address potential variations in field conditions; and 3. That the existing Stantec Consulting ltd. contact for Engineering Design Services for 236 Street Water Pump Station Replacement be increased by $350,000.00; and
Council Meeting Minutes May 10, 2022 Page 8 of 9 4. That the Financial Plan be amended to increase the project funding by $320,000.00 from the Water Revenue Fund and Development Cost Charges; and further 5. That the Corporate officer be authorized to execute the contract. CARRIED Corporate Services 1151 2021 Consolidated Financials Staff report dated May 3, 2022 recommending the 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements be approved. R/2022-CM-151 It was moved and seconded That the 2021 Consolidated Financial Statements be approved. CARRIED 1152 Amendment of Consolidated Fees & Charges Bylaw and Maple Ridge Tree Protection & Management Bylaw Staff report dated May 3, 2022, recommending that Maple Ridge Fees & Charges Amending Bylaw No. 7850-2020 and Maple Ridge Tree Protection & Management Amending Bylaw No. 7851-2022 be given first, second and third readings to provide greater clarity to the public on municipal fees and to ensure rate alignment with market levels. R/2022-CM-152 It was moved and seconded That Maple Ridge Fees & Charges Amending Bylaw No. 7850-2022 be given first, second and third reading and further That Maple Ridge Tree Protection & Management Amending Bylaw No. 7851-2022 be given first, second and third reading. CARRIED 1200 STAFF REPORTS -Nil 1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT -Nil 1400 PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD
Council Meeting Minutes May 10, 2022 Page 9 of 9 No members of the public provided comments to Council. 1500 MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS' REPORTS Council members provided their reports on activities participated in during the past few weeks. 1600 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS Councillor Yousef read the following Notice of Motion, which will be added to the Agenda for the next Regular Council Meeting for discussion: With the currently prohibitive housing costs and the high rate of inflation, first time home buyers are severely disadvantaged; Recognizing the need to provide creative solutions to the housing crisis facing our residents and continue to grow our local economy; Therefore, to ensure the proper policy framework is in place be it resolved that Council direct staff to review the housing policy and bring forward amendments to allow a rent-to-own scheme focusing primarily on townhouses and apartments in the City of Maple Ridge. 1700 ADJOURNMENT -8:04 p.m. M. Morden, Mayor Certified Correct P. Hlavac-Winsor, Acting Corporate Officer
700 ITEMS ON CONSENT
700
701 Minutes
701
701.1May 11, 2022 Mayor's Office CIRCULATED TO: Michael Morden, Mayor Chair CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE Scott Hartman, Chief Administrative Officer Member Patrick Hlavac-Winsor, Recording Secretary 1. 22-104320-BG LEGAL: PIO: LOCATION: OWNER: Lot 7 Section 26 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan LMP25391 023-213-469 13027 250 Street Neil Thompson and Colleen Thompson REQUIRED AGREEMENT: Temporary Residential Use Covenant and Release of Secondary Suite Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO 22-104320-BG. CARRIED 2. 2020-168-RZ LEGAL: PIO: LOCATION: OWNER: Lot 14 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 26732 002-376-547 13920 232 Street William Ward and Cheryl Ward REQUIRED AGREEMENT: Statutory Right of Way THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO 2020-168-RZ. CARRIED
Development Agreements Committee May 11, 2022 3. 2022-014-VP LEGAL: PIO: LOCATION: OWNER: Lot 320 District Lot 279 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 114 011-510-994 20452 Hampton Street Ajmer Singh Josan and Lovepreet Kaur REQUIRED AGREEMENT: No Suite Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO 2022-014-VP. 4. 21-106284-BG LEGAL: PIO: LOCATION: OWNER: CARRIED Lot 315 District Lot 279 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 114 011-510-951 20452 Hampton Street Mandeep Singh Chandi and Navroop Chandi REQUIRED AGREEMENT: Flood Protection Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO 21-106284-BG. 5. 2016-460-SD LEGAL: PIO: CARRIED Lot 5 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster Plan EPP67570 Lot 6 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster Plan EPP67570 Lot 7 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster Plan EPP67570 Lot 14 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster Plan EPP67570 Lot 15 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster Plan EPP67570 Lot 16 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster Plan EPP67570 030-845-220 030-845-238 030-845-246 030-845-319 030-845-327 030-845-335 Page 2 of 3
702 Reports
702
702.1
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS -April 2022 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNT A&A Testing Ltd Sanitary sewer flow monitoring 26,526 Advanced Storage Centres Security refunds 136,700 Amtruck Ltd Recycling trucks X3 320,947 Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd Abernethy Way improvements 51,135 River Rd traffic calming 6,050 Sanitary model update 31,983 89,168 Associated Fire Safety Firefighter equipment 37,389 ATS Traffic Ltd Crosswalk improvements (232 St & 126 Ave) 34,367 Badger Daylighting Lp Hydro-excavation (multiple locations) 34,298 BC Hydro Electricity 222,196 BC SPCA Contract payment 33,924 BDO Canada Lip 2021 financial statement audit 29,400 CUPE Local 622 Union dues 57,418 Caballero Sales And Service Ltd Supplies & maintenance for fleet vehicles 54,456 CDW Canada Inc Software maintenance 43,858 City of Pitt Meadows Refund overpayment of 2021 RCMP cost share agreement 97,459 Cobing Building Solutions Building maintenance (various locations) 31,432 Double V Construction Ltd Albion Community Centre 806,129 Drake Excavating (2016) Ltd 225 St pump station replacement 419,802 Emergency Communications Quarterly dispatch levy 360,057 Fortis BC Natural Gas 30,296 Fraser Valley Regional Library 2nd quarter members assessment 785,272 Contributed capital replacement funding 10,000 795,272 Fred Surridge Ltd Waterworks supplies 39,406 GPM Civil Contracting Inc Silver Valley gathering place 138,630 Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage Annual license for Maple Ridge residential transfer station 46,075 Greater Vancouver Water District Water consumption 665,579 Greater Vancouver Regional District MFA debt payments 4,013,286 Hallmark Facility Services Inc Janitorial services & supplies 52,786 lnnovyze Drainage upgrade program 33,068 ISL Engineering & Land Services Drainage upgrade program 41,989 Lafarge Canada Inc Roadworks materials (road salt, sand, etc.) 42,231 Lordco Parts Ltd Supplies & maintenance for fleet vehicles 53,069 Manulife Financial Employer/employee remittance 213,480 Maple Leaf Disposal Ltd Refuse container and litter collection 27,795 Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council Arts Centre contract 59,822 Michelin North America Inc Supplies & maintenance for fleet vehicles 26,156 Municipal Pension Plan BC Employer/employee remittance 271,413 New Rhodes Construction Inc Supply & install equestrian/pedestrian bridge 26,599 Prime Traffic Solutions Ltd Traffic control 52,789 Province of BC Integrated Homicide Investigation Team costs 193,597 Receiver General For Canada Employer/employee remittance 521,416 RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ice rentals 86,963 Ricoh Canada Inc Laserfiche renewal 124,965 Quarterly copy usage 32,237 157,202
VENDOR NAME Ridge Meadows Seniors Society Ridge Meadows Recycling Society Smith, Fraser Stantec Consulting Ltd Suncor Energy Products SV 232 Development Ltd Tundra Plumbing Ltd Warrington PCI Management Workers Compensation Board BC X10 Networks Disbursements In Excess $15,000 Disbursements Under $15,000 Total Payee Disbursements Payroll Purchase Cards -Payment Total Disbursements April 2022 DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT Quarterly operating grant Asphalt patching Litter pick up Monthly contract for recycling Professional fees 263 St reservoir expansion Gasoline & diesel fuel Security refund Miscellaneous plumbing/gas maintenance Tower common costs/building envelope work Employer/Employee remittance Software maintenance PP22/07 & PP22/08 49,589 1,232 285,302 AMOUNT 56,737 336,123 35,700 34,473 121,039 30,000 31,191 105,693 312,400 30,224 11,518,022 1,504,210 13,022,232 2,115,825 146,375 15,284,432
702.2
Conferences & Community Cell Phones/
Month of Event Reason for expense Seminars Events iPads Totals
Dueck, Judy
January Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
February Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
March Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
April Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
21.40 21.40
Duncan, Kiersten
January Cell phone charges 48.15
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
February Cell phone charges 48.15
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
March Cell phone charges 48.15
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
April Cell phone charges 48.15
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
214.00 214.00
Meadus, Chelsa
January Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
February Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
March Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
April Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
21.40 21.40
Morden, Mike
January
February
March 2021 Business Excellence Awards Gala 115.00
September 2022 Union of BC Municipalities Convention 211.64
211.64 115.00 326.64
2022 Council Expenses
Conferences & Community Cell Phones/
Month of Event Reason for expense Seminars Events Pads Totals
Robson, Gordy
January Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 26.75
February Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
March Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
April Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 26.75
64.20 64.20
Svendsen,Ryan
January Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
February Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
March Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
April Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
21.40 21.40
Yousef, Ahmed
January Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
February Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
March Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
2021 Business Excellence Awards Gala 115.00
April Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 5.35
115.00 21.40 136.40
TOTALS 211.64 230.00 363.80 805.44
2022 Council Expenses
702.3
};;,-$3,000 for the "Bard on the Bandstand" event by the Emerald Pig Theatrical Society. };;,-$1,500 for the River's Day event by the Alouette River Management Society. };;,-$2,000 for the Multicultural Day event by the Family Education Services Society. };;,-$2,000 for the Pride in the Park event hosted by the PLEA Community Services. 2. $7,500 towards events organized by the Agricultural Association and Fraser North Farmers Market Society, as per the current multi-year operating agreements, including: };;,-$6,000 for the Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association by the Country Fest. };;,-$1,500 for the Fraser North Farmers Market Association for Haney Farmers Markets. 3. $20,000 of the approved annual budget will be retained for the 2022 Intake Two of the Festival Grant Program and Grassroots Grant applications. b) Desired Outcome: That the Festival Grant Program continues to contribute towards a healthy, engaged, creative and inclusive community, and raise community pride and spirit and the profile of Maple Ridge. c) Strategic Alignment: Supporting and enhancing the quality, scope and diversity of festivals through the Festival Grant Program contributes to Council's strategic priorities; Community Spirit and Pride and Community Safety. In addition, festivals contribute towards showcasing Maple Ridge as a destination and community with rich arts and culture opportunities, which fits within the Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan (2010), Culture Plan (2018), Tourism Strategy (2018) and other key planning documents. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The Festival Grant Program assists community groups and partners to implement positive arts and cultural festivals and special events, which encourages strong citizen engagement and the development of a safe and vibrant community for all ages and abilities. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The recommended level of festival grant funding falls within the approved Parks, Recreation & Culture operating budget. Doc #30714 72 Page 2 of 3
800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
800
It’s just like leasing a Car. You have your deposit and make monthly payments
for 5 years period. At the end, you buy it out. Our listed prices are based on 5
years lease term.
801
1.Since the project is going to be finished in 14 months, your deposit will
be divided into 14 equal payments. When you move in, your deposit will
have been paid.
2.You will be making regular monthly rent payments for 5 years as stated
above. Each payment will be distributed towards principal and interest
proportionately.
3.You will buy out the property with the listed RTO price.
Example:
The deposit fee will be divided into 14 equal payments at $1807.14,
including administration and legal fees.
You deposit will have been paid and the regular rental payments will be
$2,308.59/ month once you move in.
After 5 years, the Final buyout price is $420,169.69.
Is the property mine with Rent to Own?
The homeownership will be transferred to you when the lease ends.
Do I have to pay for the strata and maintenance fees?
Yes, you would exercise every right as your own property.
What if I stop making the monthly payments?
We will firstly identify why you discontinue paying the payments and
figure out a solution that would help with your situation.
What happens if I must move somewhere else?
You would have to look for someone else to take over your lease or the
property will be taken back for further actions.
What is the property transfer tax?
Home Buyers in BC pay a provincial Property Transfer Tax
(PTT) when people purchase properties.
1000 BYLAWS
1000
1001.1CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7734-2021 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 WHEREAS Section 4 77 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "A" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Policy Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021." 2. That the Table of Contents is amended by inserting 6.4.2 Employment Park after 6.4.1 Industrial Lands and renumbering the following sections accordingly. 3. That Chapter 6 Employment, 6.4 Industrial Opportunities, 6.4.1 Industrial Lands, Policy 6-44 is amended by deleting the policy and replacing with the following: "6 -44 The Industrial land use designation is a key component of achieving a compact community. Within the Industrial designation, there are 3 industrial categories, the components of which are highlighted in this chapter: a) Business Park Industrial -lands that are located in the Maple Meadows Industrial Park and Albion Industrial Area. The Business Parks provide for a range of industrial uses and services, with an emphasis on landscaping and design. b) Employment Park Industrial -lands that are located in the Yennadon Lands Employment Park. Employment Park Industrial provides for a range of employment uses close to where people live while reducing possible negative impacts on existing surrounding neighbourhoods. c) General Industrial -lands that are located throughout the community and provide for a range of services and general industrial uses." 4. That Chapter 6 Employment is amended by inserting 6.4.2 Employment Park, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms a part of this bylaw as Schedule 1, following 6.4.1 Industrial Lands and renumbering the remaining sections, policies, and associated policy references accordingly. 5. That Chapter 8 Development Permit Area Guidelines be amended by inserting the following after "Ground-Oriented Residential Infill" on the Title Page: + Yennadon Lands Employment Park
6. That Chapter 8 Development Permit Area Guidelines, Section 8.2 Application and Intent be amended by inserting the following after 8.2 (9): "10. Yennadon Lands Employment Park pursuant to Section 488 of the Local Government Act to establish guidelines for the form and character of intensive light industrial use and for the protection of natural features and ecologically significant land." 7. That Chapter 8 Development Permit Area Guidelines is amended by inserting the Yennadon Lands Employment Park Development Permit Area Guidelines, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms a part of this bylaw as Schedule 2, following after Section 8.14 Ground Oriented Residential Infill Development Permit Guidelines. 8. That Appendix C Zoning Matrix, Industrial Designations* be amended by inserting the following between "General Industrial Category" and "Business Park Category": Employment Park Category * (Subject to policies in Section 6.4.2) M-7 Employment Park Industrial 9. That Appendix C Zoning Matrix, Industrial Designations*, Business Park Category be amended by removing the reference to 'Section 6.4.2' and replacing it with 'Section 6.4.3' and that "M-7 Employment Park Industrial" be added after "M-3 Business Park". 10. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 11th day of May, 2021. READ a second time as amended the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of , 202X. , 202X. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1001.2CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7735-2021 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule 11B11 and Schedule "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021." 2. To amend the Urban Area Boundary, as shown in Schedule 1 Map No. 1037, to include the Yennadon Lands in their entirety. 3. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Parcel A, Lot 8, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster Land District, REF PL 8148; Lot 7, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Lot 6, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Lot 5, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Lot 3, Plan NWP5430, Su blot 1, Part NE1/ 4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District, Except Plan PARCEL "A" RP22408, P23424; Lot 4, Plan NWP5430, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District, Except Plan 23424, LMP12700; Lot 2, Plan NWP22339, Part NE1/ 4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Lot 46, Plan NWP31436, Part NE1/ 4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Lot 55, Plan NWP40879, Part NE1/4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Lot 56, Plan NWP40879, Part NE1/ 4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Parcel B, Lot 8, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster Land District, (REF PL 13094); and
1001.3CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7838-2022 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 WHEREAS Section 4 77 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "B" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7838-2022." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 43, Plan NWP30199, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1056, a copy of which is attached hereto as Schedule 1 and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby re-designated to Industrial (Employment Park Category). 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 12th day of April, 2022. READ a second time the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of , 202X. PRESIDING MEMBER , 202X. CORPORATE OFFICER
1002.1CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7690-2020 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" Zoning Bylaw Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7690-2020." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 109 District Lot 396 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 26368 Lot 110 District Lot 396 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 26368 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1855 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to C-3 (Town Centre Commercial). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 26th day of January, 2021. READ a second time the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, '2022. READ a third time the day of ,20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this ,20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 day of PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1003.1CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7514-2018 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 WHEREAS Section 4 77 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedules 1'A" & 11C11 to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as 11Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7514-2018." 2. Schedule 1'A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan, Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan and "Figure 1: Northeast Albion" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 17613 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 987, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw, are hereby designated as shown. 3. Schedule "C" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 17613 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 988, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 12th day of April, 2022. READ a second time the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the day of ADOPTED the day of PRESIDING MEMBER , 20. , 20. CORPORATE OFFICER
1003.2CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7515-2018 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 -2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7515-2018." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 17613 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1781 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-3 (Single Detached (Intensive) Urban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 27th day of November, 2018. READ a second time as amended the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the day of ,20 ADOPTED, the day of ,20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1004.1CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7832-2022 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 WHEREAS Section 4 77 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedules 11811 & 11C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7832-2022" 2. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Section 22 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 23770 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1053, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby designated as shown. 3. Schedule "C" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Section 22 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 23770 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1053, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 12th day of April, 2022. READ a second time the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of ,20 . PRESIDING MEMBER ,20 CORPORATE OFFICER
1004.2CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7528-2019 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" Zoning Bylaw Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 -2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 -2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7528-2019." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Section 22 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 23770 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1790 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 -2019, as amended, and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 29th day of January, 2019. READ a second time the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER ,20 CORPORATE OFFICER
1005.1CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7691-2020 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule "A" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7691-2020." 2. Schedule "A", Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A -Silver Valley, Figure 2 -Land Use Plan, and Figure 3D -Horse Hamlet, are hereby amended for the parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 45 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 63118 and outlined in heavy black line on M@p No. 1030, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw, is hereby designated as shown. 3. Schedule "C" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 45 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 63118 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1031, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014, as amended, is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 12th day of April, 2022. READ a second time the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER , 20 CORPORATE OFFICER
1005.2CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7692-2020 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" Zoning Bylaw Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 -2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 -2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7692-2020." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 45 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 63118 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1856 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (Single Detached (Medium Density) Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 -2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 12th day of January, 2021. READ a second time the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER ,20 CORPORATE OFFICER
1006.1CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7839-2022 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 WHEREAS Section 4 77 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule 11A11 to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7839-2022." 2. Schedule "A", Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A -Silver Valley, Figure 2 -Land Use Plan, and Figure 3A -Blaney Hamlet are hereby amended for the parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Section 32 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP70286 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1057, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw, is hereby designated as shown. 3. Schedule "A", Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A -Silver Valley, Figure 4 -Trails/ Open Space is hereby amended for the parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Section 32 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP70286 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1058, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw, is hereby designated as shown. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 12th day of April, 2022. READ a second time the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of ,20 PRESIDING MEMBER , 20 CORPORATE OFFICER
1006.2CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7725-2021 A Bylaw to amend Schedule ''A'1 Zoning Bylaw Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7725-2021." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Section 32 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP70286 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1876 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map "N' attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 13th day of April, 2021. READ a second time the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of ,20 PRESIDING MEMBER ,20 CORPORATE OFFICER
1007.1CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7846-2022 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 WHEREAS Section 4 77 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule 11A11 to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as 11Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7846-2022.11 2. Schedule "A", Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A -Silver Valley, Figure 2 -Land Use Plan and Figure 3A -Blaney Hamlet, are hereby amended for the parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 4 Except: Firstly: Part on Plan with Bylaw filed 34267, Secondly: Part Lying South and East of Road Shown on Plan with Bylaw Files 34267, Thirdly: Part on Plan 26732, Block "C" Section, Section 33, Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 2409; Lot 8, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 13766; Lot 15, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 26732; Lot 1, Block "C", Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 2409; and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1059, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw, is hereby designated as shown. 3. Schedule "A", Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A -Silver Valley, Figure 4 -Trails/ Open Space is/are hereby amended for the parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 4 Except: Firstly: Part on Plan with Bylaw filed 34267, Secondly: Part Lying South and East of Road Shown on Plan with Bylaw Files 34267, Thirdly: Part on Plan 26732, Block "C" Section, Section 33, Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 2409; Lot 8, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 13766; Lot 15, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 26732; Lot 1, Block "C", Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 2409 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1060, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw, is hereby designated as shown. CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7846-2022 Page 1 of2
4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 26th day of April, 2022 READ a second time the 26th day of April, 2022 PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022 READ a third time the ADOPTED, the PRESIDING MEMBER CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7846-2022 day of day of ,20 ,20 CORPORATE OFFICER Page 2 of2
1007.2CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7768-2021 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" Zoning Bylaw Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7768-2021." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 4 Except: Firstly: Part on Plan with Bylaw filed 34267, Secondly: Part Lying South and East of Road Shown on Plan with Bylaw Files 34267, Thirdly: Part on Plan 26732, Block "C" Section, Section 33, Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 2409; Lot 8, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 13766; Lot 15, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 26732; Lot 1, Block "C", Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 2409; and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1893 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is are hereby rezoned to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential), R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 13th day of July, 2021. READ a second time as amended, the 26th day of April, 2022 PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the day of ,20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1008TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Third and Final Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7833-2022 9450 287 Street MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: May 24, 2022 2019-402-RZ COUNCIL Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7833-2022, for the subject property located at 9450 287 Street, was considered by Council and granted first and second reading on April 12, 2022. In accordance with the Local Government Act, Section 464 (2), as the Zoning Bylaw to discharge the Land Use Contract from the subject property is consistent with the Official Community Plan, the Public Hearing was waived. In accordance with Section 467 of the Local Government Act, notifications were published in the local newspaper on May 13, 2022 and May 20, 2022. Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7833-2022 is now before Council for consideration for third and final reading. The purpose of Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7833-2022 is to discharge the Land Use Contract from the subject property, as the Land Use Contract was previously replaced by Zone Amending Bylaw No. 3373-1984 on June 25, 1984, but was not removed from Title at the Land Titles Office. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7833-2022 be given third reading and be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: On April 12, 2022, Council granted first and second reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7833-2022. The requirement for a Public Hearing was waived in accordance with the Local Government Act Section 464 (2) and notifications were published in the local newspaper on May 13, 2022 and May 20, 2022. 2019-402-RZ Page 1 of 2
CONCLUSION: As there were no conditions to be met, it is recommended that third and final reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7833-2022. "Original signed by Michelle Baski" Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT, MA Planner "Original signed by Mark McMullen" for Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendix is attached hereto: Appendix A -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7833-2022 2019-402-RZ Page 2 of 2
1008.1CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7833-2022 A Bylaw to amend Schedule 'A' Zoning Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019, as amended APPENDIX A WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; AND WHEREAS, a local government may, under s. 548 of the Local Government Act, terminate a land use contract that applies to land within the jurisdiction of the local government; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7833-2022." 2. The Land Use Contract Bylaw between the City of Maple Ridge and Camgee Holdings Ltd., registered in the New Westminster Land Title Office under charge number M52309 against Title to the land described as: Lot 29 Except: Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan LMP3310, District Lot 438, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 47148 and shown outlined in heavy black line, on the attached Map No. 1956, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is discharged in respect of that land, and the authorized signatories of the City may execute the Discharge Agreement attached to this bylaw as Schedule 'A'. 3. The Land Use Contract Bylaw No. 2336-1976 is hereby repealed. 4. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 12th day of April, 2022. READ a second time the 12th day of April, 2022. READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of , 20 PRESIDING MEMBER , 20 CORPORATE OFFICER
1009THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE Bylaw No. 7850-2022 A Bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Fees & Charges Bylaw No. 7575-2019 WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Fees & Charges Bylaw No. 7575-2019; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Maple Ridge, ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1. This bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Fees & Charges Amending Bylaw No. 7850-2022". 2. Maple Ridge Fees & Charges Bylaw No. 7575-2019 is amended by: (a) In the Table of Contents, under Fees and Description: 1. Adding Schedule D General Administration as the last row with the Descriptions: "Copying Costs" "Record Requests" (b) In Part 3, Previous Bylaw Repeal below 3.1 add "3.2 Bylaw No. 7137-2017 as amended is hereby repealed in its entirety"; (c) Replacing Schedule B "Parks, Recreation & Culture Fees" with Fees & Charges Amending Bylaw 7850-2022 Schedule A "Parks, Recreation & Culture Fees", attached hereto; (d) Adding Schedule D "General Administration Fees" with Fees & Charges Amending Bylaw 7850-2022 Schedule B "General Administration Fees", attached hereto; (e) Replacing the cell in the Rezoning Table in Schedule "C' from "Multi-Family -plus: Per Lot" to "Multi-Family -plus: Per Unit" (f) Retitling "Subdivision Extension Fee" to "Subdivision PRL Extension Fee"; (g) Removing PRL Extension Fee row in its entirety; (h) Retitling "Rezoning Extension at 1st and 3rd Reading" with "Rezoning Extension at 3rd Reading"; (i) Retitling "Official Community Plan Amendment Extension at 1st and 3rd Reading" with "Official Community Plan Amendment Extension at 3rd Reading"; U) Retitling "Heritage Alteration Agreement" to "Heritage Conservation Restrictive Covenant"; (k) Retitling "Landscape Inspection Request" to "Landscape Re-Inspection Request". (I) Adding Schedule E "Electric Vehicle Parking Fees" with Fees & Charges Amending Bylaw 7850-2022 Schedule C "Electric Vehicle Parking Fee", attached hereto. READ a first time the 10th day of May, 2022 READ a second time the 10th day of May, 2022 READ a third time the 10th day of May, 2022 RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of, 2022 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
Schedule A -"Parks, Recreation & Culture Fees" Schedule "B" -Parks, Recreation & Culture Fees Note: 1. New rates are in effect September 1 of the noted year. 2. All fees are exclusive of tax, which will be added, if applicable. 3. Non-prime time rates will be a 50% reduction of the regular rates and applied to all hours outside of the prime time windows listed below: Single 10 Pass 20 Pass 1 Month 3 Months 1 Year Single 10 Pass 20 Pass 1 Month 3 Months 1 Year Single 10 Pass 20 Pass 1 Month 3 Months 1 Year Days Monday -Friday Saturday/Sunday (Year-Round) Admissions Child 2022 $ 3.05 $ 26.10 $ 48.72 $ 27.41 $ 73.08 $247.95 Youth/Student/Senior 2022 $ 4.10 $ 35.10 $ 65.52 $ 36.86 $ 98.28 $333.45 Adult 2022 $ 5.99 $ 51.30 $ 95.76 $ 53.87 $143.64 $487.35 Hours 5:00 pm -9:00 pm 8:00 am -9:00 pm
Schedule A -"Parks, Recreation & Culture Fees" Family 2022 Single $ 10.96 10 Pass $ 98.46 20 Pass $175.39 1 Month $103.38 3 Months $275.69 1 Year $935.37 Drop-In Skating -Single 2022 Child $ 2.99 Youth/Student/Senior $ 4.03 Adult/Parent & Tot $ 5.44 Family $ 9.58 Oudoor Pool Admission -Single 2022 Child $ 1.90 Youth/Student/Senior $ 1.90 Adult/Parent & Tot $ 2.86
Schedule A -"Parks, Recreation & Culture Fees" Arenas All rates are listed hourly Ice -Prime Time 2022 2023 I 2024 Youth/Senior Non-Profit $ 115.86 Adult Non-Profit $ 173.78 Private $ 289.63 Commercial $ 320.24 $ 336.25 I $ 353.06 Non-Resident $ 309.79 Ice -Non-Prime Time 2022 2023 I 2024 Youth/Senior Non-Profit $ 86.90 Adult Non-Profit $130.34 Private $ 217.22 Commercial $ 240.18 $ 252.19 I $ 264.80 Non-Resident $ 232.34 Dry Floor -Prime Time 2022 2023 I 2024 Youth/Senior Non-Profit $ 44.03 Adult Non-Profit $ 66.05 Private $ 110.08 Commercial $146.59 $ 149.52 j $ 152.51 Non-Resident $ 131.85 Ice -Junior B 2022 Prime Time/Games $ 121.37 Non-Prime/Practices $ 91.04
Schedule A -"Parks, Recreation & Culture Fees" Fairgrounds Stage included at no-charge when booking grounds All rates are hourly Barns 2022 Youth/Senior Non-Profit $ 8.32 Adult Non-Profit $ 12.48 Private $ 20.81 Commercial $ 22.89 Non-Resident $ 24.97 Grounds & Showrings 2022 Youth/Senior Non-Profit $ 7.28 Adult Non-Profit $ 10.92 Private $ 18.21 Commercial $ 20.03 Non-Resident $ 21.85
Halls Non-Prime time rates will be a 50% reduction of the regular rates. Facility rates are hourly Kitchen rates are daily Great Hall -Albion Community Centre 2022 Youth/Senior Non-Profit $ 49.35 Adult Non-Profit $ 74.02 Private $123.37 Commercial $244.31 Non-Resident $237.33 Hammond Hall -Hourly 2022 Youth/Senior Non-Profit $ 25.97 Adult Non-Profit $ 38.96 Private $ 64.93 Commercial $ 87.33 Non-Resident $ 79.68 Whonnock Hall -Hourly 2022 Youth/Senior Non-Profit $ 84.84 Adult Non-Profit $127.27 Private $212.11 Commercial $244.31 Non-Resident $237.33 Kitchen 2022 Youth/Senior Non-Profit $ 34.84 Adult Non-Profit $ 52.28 Private $ 87.12 Commercial $122.71 Non-Resident $122.71 2023 I 2024 I 2025 $256.53 I $269.35 I $282.82 2023 I 2024 I 2025 $ 91.70 I $ 96.28 I $101.10 2023 I 2024 I 2025 $256.53 I $269.35 I $282.82 2023 I 2024 I 2025 $125.16 I $127.67 I $130.22
Schedule A -"Parks, Recreation & Culture Fees" Pools All rates are listed hourly Competition/Teach Pool (Per Lane) 2022 2023 I 2024 I 2025 Swim Club -Competition Pool $ 5.96 Swim Club -Teach Pool $ 5.07 Youth/Senior Non-Profit $10.37 Adult Non-Profit $ 15.56 Private $ 25.94 Commercial $ 32.95 $ 34.60 I $ 36.33 I $ 38.14 Non-Resident $ 30.74 Hammond Pool (Whole Pool) 2022 2023 I 2024 I 2025 Swim Club $ 20.28 Youth/Senior Non-Profit $ 27.29 Adult Non-Profit $ 40.93 Private $ 68.22 Commercial $ 74.07 $ 11.11 I $ 81.661 $ 85.75 Non-Resident $ 69.50
Fields Youth/Senior Non-Profit Artifical Turf 2022 2023 Commercial $ 23.17 $ 24.33 Special Event $ 5.80 $ 6.09 Regular Use $ -Class A 2022 2023 Commercial $23.17 Special Event $ 5.50 Regular Use $ -Class B 2022 2023 Commercial $ 17.26 Special Event $ 4.32 Regular Use $ -Class C 2022 2023 Commercial $ 5.76 Special Event $ 1.44 Regular Use $ -
Schedule A -"Parks, Recreation & Culture Fees" Adult Non-Profit Artifical Turf 2022 2023 Commercial $ 23.17 $ 24.33 Special Event $ 17.92 $ 18.82 Regular Use $ 13.34 $ 14.01 Class A 2022 Commercial $ 23.17 Special Event $ 17.07 Regular Use $ 12.70 Class B 2022 Commercial $ 17.26 Special Event $ 12.01 Regular Use $ 6.98 Class C 2022 Commercial $ 5.76 Special Event $ 2.89 Regular Use $ -Local, Private or Political (Hourly) 2022 2023 Artificial Turi $ 23.17 $ 24.33 Class A $ 23.17 Class B $ 17.26 Class C $ 5.76 Commercial (Hourly) 2022 2023 2024 2025 Artificial Turi $ 25.49 $ 26.76 $ 28.10 $ 29.51 Class A $ 25.49 $ 26.76 $ 28.10 $ 29.51 Class B $ 18.98 $ 19.93 $ 20.93 $ 21.97 Class C $ 6.34 $ 6.66 $ 6.99 $ 7.34 Non-Resident 2022 2023 Artificial Turi $ 29.13 $ 30.59 Class A $ 29.13 Class B $ 24.66 Class C $ 8.57
Schedule A -"Parks, Recreation & Culture Fees" Miscellaneous Sports Field User Annual Contribution 2022 2023 I 2024 I 2025 Park Shelter ( day rate) $ 73.50 Event Trailer (day rate) $ 147.31 Tennis/Sport Court (Commercial) $ 15.75 $ 16.54 I $ 17.36 I $ 18.23
Schedule B -"General Administration Fees" Schedule "D" -General Administration Fees Copying Costs 2022 2023 2024 2025 Standard copies -8.5 x 11 $ 0.50 $ 0.51 $ 0.52 $ 0.53 Property Information Request/Tax Certificate 2022 2023 2024 2025 From property owner No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge From non-owner $ 40.00 $ 40.80 $ 41.62 $ 42.45 Requests through BC Online (BC Online customers will $ 40.00 $ 40.80 $ 41.62 $ 42.45 have BC Online administration fee added to this fee) Payment File for Mortgage Company Tax Clients -$ 10.00 $ 10.20 $ 10.40 $ 10.61 per folio/roll number Returned Cheque Fee $ 30.00 $ 30.60 $ 31.21 $ 31.84 Historical Property Related Information -Per Hour 2022 2023 2024 2025 From property owner -First hour No Charge No Charge No Charge No Charge From property owner -Additional hour or portion $ 40.00 $ 40.80 $ 41.62 $ 42.45 From non-owner $ 40.00 $ 40.80 $ 41.62 $ 42.45 Requests through BC Online (BC Online customers will $ 40.00 $ 40.80 $ 41.62 $ 42.45 have BC Online administration fee added to this fee) Fire Department Record Requests 2022 2023 2024 2025 Fire Incident/Investigation Reports $200.00 $204.00 $208.08 $212.24 (including color photographs) MVA/Medical Incident Report $100.00 $102.00 $104.04 $106.12
1010THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE Bylaw No. 7851-2022 A Bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Tree Protection & Management Bylaw No. 7314-2015 WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Tree Protection & Management Bylaw No. 7314-2015; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Maple Ridge, ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1. This bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Tree Protection & Management Amending Bylaw No. 7851-2022". 2. Tree Protection & Management Bylaw No. 7314-2015 is amended by: (a) Replacing 6.1 (d) in its entirety with "be accompanied by the applicable Permit fee in accordance with Schedule C of the Maple Ridge Fees & Charges Bylaw No. 7575-2021.". (b) Replacing Schedule "D" Tree Permit Application with Schedule A of the Maple Ridge Tree Protection & Management Amending Bylaw 7851-2022. READ a first time the 10th day of May, 2022 READ a second time the 10th day of May, 2022 READ a third time the 10th day of May, 2022 RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of, 2022 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
Schedule A -Tree Permit Application r ~. IIH#•i;JMUI l ~ M:ffiMN@i+-mapleridge.ca Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Schedule "D" TREE PERMIT APPLICATION 1. Full name(s) and address of applicant: Postal Code: _____ _ Home phone: ______ _ Cell: ________ _ Email: _____________________ _ 2. Full name(s) and address of owner (if different than applicant): Postal Code: ________ Telephone: _________ _ Email: A consent form signed by the Owner must accompany this application if applicant and owner are not the same. 3. Full name of tree cutting company: Phone: ___________ Email: __________________ _ 4. Property proposed for tree cutting: Street Address: ______________________ _ Or Legal Description:---------------------5. Purpose of proposed tree cutting: (hazard trees must be verified by City staff): 6. Number, Type and Location of trees to be cut: (trees are to be tagged on site):
7. Draw a dimensional sketch of the parcel showing the approximate location of the trees to be cut, the location of the trees to be retained, the location of barrier fencing, the location and species of any required Replacement Trees, topographic and hydrological features, structures, roads and other information useful in determining location. 8. A Tree Management Plan must accompany this application if tree cutting is taking place on property that is under a development application, when cutting more than 20 trees; or when clearing more than 500 square metres of land. FEE: Applications for a permit shall be accompanied by the prescribed fee as set out in the Maple Ridge Fees and Charges Bylaw No. 7575-2019. Urban Area and Urban Reserve and Rural parcels $75 for first tree + $25 each additional tree less than 0.5 ha Rural Area on parcels greater than 0.5 ha $75 for 11th tree+ $25 each additional tree Development & Large Scale Clearing: $300 base fee+ $25 per tree Tree Replacement: $600 I HEREBY DECLARE that the above information is correct, and that I will abide by all the applicable provisions of the Maple Ridge Tree Protection and Management bylaw and conditions of the Tree Removal Permit issued pursuant to this application. Name of Applicant(s): Signature of Applicant(s): Date: _______________ _
1100 COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
11011~•-mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: May 17, 2022 FILE NO: 2020-237-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C o W SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7844-2022 11070 Lockwood Street and 24984, 25024 & 25038 112 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject properties, located at 11070 Lockwood Street and 24984, 25024 & 25038 112 Avenue, from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) and RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) to permit a future subdivision of approximately 38 single-family lots and a 103 townhouse unit development. In addition, a 0.49 ha (1.20 acre) parcel of land will be purchased by the City at a future date for a City park, to be negotiated by the City and the owner. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. An Official Community Plan amendment will be required to re-designate the land use from Low/Medium Density Residential to Single Family, Townhouse, Conservation, and Park. These designations are proposed by the North East Albion Area Concept Plan (Concept Plan) that was endorsed by Council and used to amend the Albion Area Plan which received first reading on January 20, 2021. There may be additional amendments required to the Albion Area Plan to incorporate policies within the Concept Plan related to this development. As per Council Policy 6.31, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) program. The CAC rates in Policy 6.31 are currently under review, and if approved at an upcoming Council meeting, it is anticipated that this application will be subject to new rates. The expected CAC contribution rate for this rezoning application will be confirmed in the second reading report. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. In respect of Section 4 75 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies, 2020-237-RZ Page 1 of 7
East: West: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential Low/Medium Density Residential and Suburban Residential Single-Family Residential RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) Low/Medium Density Residential Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential, Multi-Family Residential, Conservation and Park 7 .39 ha (18.24 acres) 112 Avenue, Lockwood Street and 110 Avenue Urban Standard The four subject properties are located within the North East Albion Area of the Albion Area Plan, south of 112 Avenue, east of Lockwood Street, and north of 110 Avenue (see Appendices A and B). The subject properties are influenced by several creeks and there are several pockets of deciduous and coniferous trees. The subject properties slope from the southeast up to the northwest. c) Project Description: A rezoning application has been received to rezone the subject properties from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) and RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) to permit a single-family residential subdivision, townhouse development, active park to be purchased, and conservation areas to be dedicated. The following table provides a breakdown of the proposed zones with the associated approximate lot and unit count. RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) -No Change to Zone R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) 9 0 38 0 0 103 At this time, the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and further reports will be required prior to second reading. Elements to be reviewed by the City include: • Environmental reports; • Arborist report assessing significant stands of trees; • Servicing and lot grading plans; and • Geotechnical report. 2020-237-RZ Page 3 of 7
Assessment of these elements is likely to impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and could change after servicing details and analysis reports are reviewed. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the Approving Officer. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The North East Albion Area Concept Plan, endorsed by Council on October 1, 2019, has not yet been incorporated into the Official Community Plan, but is used as a guide to review applications on a case by case basis. The Plan seeks to develop a complete community by integrating environmental stewardship, the protection of natural resources and the preservation of ecosystems whole balancing the social and economic objectives of the community. The community will focus on multi-family development around commercial and amenity nodes, all linked by streets and a multi-modal network of paths and amenities like school, parks, conservation areas and shopping. This application is in keeping with the proposed land used designations and policies outlined in the Concept Plan. Council granted first reading to Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7698-2021 on January 26, 2021 to amend the Albion Area Plan and incorporate the proposed Concept Plan. The current Albion Area Plan designates the subject properties as Low/Medium Density Residential; however, the subject properties fall within the Concept Plan which identifies the properties as Townhouse, Conservation, Single Family, and Park. Since, this application is proceeding in advance of the North East Albion Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7698-2021, an OCP amendment will be required to designate those portions of the subject properties proposed to be rezoned for R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) to Single-Family and the subject property to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) as Medium Density Residential. In order to designate the subject properties to Single-Family and Townhouse these designations and associated policies contained in the Concept Plan will need to be incorporated into the Albion Area Plan through an OCP amendment. These amendments will be included in the second reading report. In addition, those portions of the land identified as environmentally sensitive areas will need to be designated as Conservation and those land identified as neighbourhood park will be designated Park. The Conservation and Park designations currently exist within the Albion Area Plan; therefore, no additional policy amendments will be required. Zoning Bylaw: The application proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) and RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) to permit a future subdivision of approximately 38 single-family lots and approximately 103 units townhouse development (see Appendix D). Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. 2020-237-RZ Page 4 of 7
Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. Pursuant to Sectio,n 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top of bank of all watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the OCP, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for: • All areas designated Conservation on Schedule "B" or all areas within 50 metres of an area designated Conservation on Schedule "B"; • All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15%; and • All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural Features Schedule "C" to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions. Pursuant to Section 8.12 of the OCP, a Wildfire Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity identified in wildfire risk areas. The purpose of the Wildfire Development Permit is for the protection of life and property in designated areas that could be at risk for wildland fire; and where this risk may be reasonably abated through implementation of appropriate precautionary measures. The subject property is located within the Wildfire Development Permit Area, identified on Map 1 in Section 8.12 of the Official Community Plan. Prior to second reading a Registered Professional Forester's Report will be required to determine wildfire mitigation requirements. Advisory Design Panel: A Multi-Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to Second Reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. 2020-237-RZ Page 5 of 7
e) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department; f) School District; g) Utility companies; and h) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing and site access requirements have not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Early and Ongoing Consultation: In respect of Section 4 75 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an OCP amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the City's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. g) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 as amended: 1. An OCP Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); 3. A Multi-Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D); 4. A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); 5. A Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); 6. A Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G); 7. A Wildfire Development Permit Application (Schedule J); and 8. A Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. 2020-237-RZ Page 6 of 7
CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the policies of the OCP and the Northeast Albion Concept Plan which is proposed to amend the OCP. Justification has been provided to support an OCP amendment to designate portions of the subject properties to Single Family and Townhouse. These designations are not currently contained in the Albion Area Plan concept; therefore, these designations and associated policies contained in the Concept Plan will need to be incorporated into the Albion Area Plan. In addition, those portions of the land identified as environmentally sensitive areas will need to be designated as Conservation and land identified as neighbourhood park will be designated Park. The land proposed to be designated Park to accommodate the future City funded neighbourhood Park will purchased by the City at a future date. The details of the purchase of the land will be subject to a future report to Council. It is, therefore, recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. "Original signed by Wendy Cooper" Prepared by: Wendy Cooper, M.Sc., MCIP,RPP Planner "Original signed by Mark McMullen" for Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7844-2022 Appendix D -Proposed Site Plan 2020-237-RZ Page 7 of 7
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7844-2022 A Bylaw to amend Schedule jA' Zoning Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended APPENDIXC WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7844-2022." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Parcel uA" (Explanatory Plan 16432, Lot 4, Section 11, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 1363; Lot 28, Section 11, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 34098; Lot 29, Section 11, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 34098; and Lot 4 Except: Firstly: Parcel UA" (Explanatory Plan 16432) and Secondly: Part Dedicated as Road on Plan 29924; Section 11 Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 1363 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1958 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R-1 (Single Detached (Low Density) Urban Residential) and RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map jA' attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of READ a second time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of ADOPTED the day of PRESIDING MEMBER , 20 ,20 ,20 ,20 , 20 CORPORATE OFFICER
1102
4. That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7542-2019 be given first and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing; 5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7543-2019 as amended, be given second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing; 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedules 11811 and "C"; iii) Road dedication as required; iv) Park dedication as required, including construction of a multi-purpose trails; and removal of all debris and garbage from park land; v) Consolidation of the subject properties; vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject properties for the proposed development; vii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant pertaining to the Fraser River floodplain report, which addresses the suitability of the subject properties for the proposed development; viii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the protection of the Environmentally Sensitive areas (wetlands) on the subject properties; ix) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the Visitor Parking; Tree Protection, and Stormwater Management; x) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the Visitor Parking; xi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the Tree Protection; xii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the Stormwater Management; xiii) Registration of a Statutory Right-of-Way plan and agreement for a Public Trail; xiv) Removal of existing buildings; xv) In addition to the Ministry of Environment Site Disclosure Statement, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject properties. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; and xvi) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $418,200 ($4,100 X 102 units) be provided in keeping with the Council Policy 6.31 with regard to Community Amenity Contributions, or at the rate adopted by Council at the time this application receives third reading. 2018-289-RZ Page 2 of 8
DISCUSSION: 1. Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Flood Plain: Fraser Sewer Area: Companion Applications: 2018-289-RZ Flat Architecture Inc. Lot 4 District Lot 405 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 60014; Lot 5 District Lot 405 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 60014; Lot 1 District Lot 405 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 60014; and Lot 2 District Lot 405 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 60014. Urban Residential and Conservation Urban Residential and Conservation RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential), and RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) Multi-Family and Park RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential), and RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) Urban Residential and Conservation Fallow Agricultural Land RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential), and RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) Agricultural Single Family Residential RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential and R-3(Single. Detached (Intensive) Urban Residential) Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential R-2 (Single Detached (Medium Density) Urban Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential and Vacant Townhouses 2.10 ha (5.18 acres) Slatford Place Urban Standard Yes Yes 2018-289-DP /DVP Page 3 of 8
2. Project Description: The four subject properties encompass approximately 2.10 ha (5.18 acres) of land located on the west side of 240 Street and the east side of Slatford Place (see Appendix A). The applicant has applied to rezone the subject properties from R-3 (Single Detached (Intensive) Urban Residential) and RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) to facilitate a 102-unit townhouse development (see Appendix A). Portions of the subject properties are located with the Fraser River 200-year floodplain. The geotechnical engineer of record will need to include details in the geotechnical report that is required as part of the approval process regarding the impacts that the Fraser River 200-year floodplain may have on the subject properties. A floodplain restrictive covenant may be required as a condition of final reading pending the conclusions of the geotechnical report. 3. Planning Analysis: i) Official Community Plan: The OCP designates the subject properties Urban Residential and with the consolidation of all four properties into a single parcel before the adoption of Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7543-2019 the Urban Residential -Major Corridor policies would support the proposed development of townhouses which are detailed below. "Policy 3.13 (3-18), 2) Major Corridor Residential -General Characteristics: a) Major Corridor Residential is characterized by the following: i) Has frontage on an existing major Road Corridor as identified on Figure 4 Proposed Major Corridor Network Plan. ii) Includes ground orientated housing forms such as single detached dwellings, garden suites, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhouses, apartments, or small lot intensive residential, subject to compliance with Major Corridor Residential infill policies." There are adjustments of the land use designation to reflect ground truthing of the site. Portions of the property will be designated Conservation as depicted in OCP Amending Bylaw 7542-2019. ii) Zoning Bylaw: The current applicaiotn proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential), and RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit a 102-unit towhouse development (see Appendix C). The maximum density or Floor Space Ration (FSR) for the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Zone designated Major Cooridor Residential is 0.75. The applicant is proposing the following to achieve a FSR of 0.75: 2018-289-RZ Page 4 of 8
Density FSR Type of Density Bonus Base 0.60 Not Application $344.46 cash contribution per square metre. Bonus 0.15 Estimate cash contribution (2,897m2 X $344.46) $997,900.62 iii) Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: Parking Required Proposed Spaces per unit 102 units X 2 spaces = 204 spaces 204 Spaces Visitor Spaces 102 units X 0.20 space = 21 spaces 21 iv) Proposed Variances: A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves relaxations to Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019. Potential variances to the north and south interior side lot line will be required as well as increase to the height for the amenity building. Variances will be considered in a future report to Council. v) Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the OCP, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for: • All areas designated Conservation on Schedule "B" or all areas within 50 metres of an area designated Conservation on Schedule "B"; • All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent; and • All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Schedule "C" to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions. vi) Advisory Design Panel: The application was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel (ADP) at a meeting held on January 19, 2022 at which the following resolution was carried: urhat the Advisory Design Panel has reviewed application 2018-289-DP and recommends that the following concerns be addressed and digital versions of revised drawings and memo be submitted to Planning staff; and further that Planning staff forward this on to the Advisory Design Panel for information. 2018-289-RZ Page 5 of 8
Architectural Comments: • Improve connection from indoor amenity to outdoor amenity spaces; • Explore series of colour palettes to improve massing and wayfinding; • Explore opportunities for rooftop patios; • Explore opportunities to increase prominence of front entries. Landscape Comments: • Address isolation of outdoor amenity space and limited access to central amenity area; • Incorporate dedicated pedestrian circulation and cross paths to enhance walkabi/ity of site; , • Improve limited bike parking options with better integration into entire site; • Highlight access to outdoor amenity spaces with road treatment; • Consider additional bio swa/es to improve permeability in open spaces; • Review narrow terraced walls for required soil volume for trees (10 m3 of soil per tree); • Provide complete landscape plans for review to panel; • Triangular landscape median appears to be opportunity for feature." The applicant has responded to the ADP comments as can be seen in Appendix H. A detailed description of the projects form and character will be included in a future Development Permit report to Council. vii) Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was conducted via the Public Comment Opportunity process from April 18 to April 29, 2022. During the comment date range, Flat Architecture, the applicant, received several comments from the Public that are detailed below (Appendix I). In addition, a petition was forwarded to Council opposing the proposed development. • Entrance to the proposed development is located off of Slatford Place which will increase traffic on Slatford Place. • Protection of wetlands. • Number of proposed units. • Size of the outdoor amenity space for child play. • Retention of trees. The following are provided in response to the issues raised by the public: • The entrance is located off of Slatford Place per the City's requirement. • A full Environmental Impact assessment has been submitted to the City to fulfill the Natural Features Development Permit Requirements. • The proposed density falls with the policy guidance of the Official Community plan for land designated a Major Corridor Residential. • The outdoor amenity space exceeds the minimum requirements of the Zoning Bylaw. 2018-289-RZ Page 6 of 8
4. Environmental Implications: The subject properties contain steep slopes and is influenced by Spencer Creek; therefore, a Natural Features Development Permit has been submitted along with an Environmental Assessment Report and Arborist Report. Before adoption of the bylaw a staff-issued Natural Features Development Permit will be required. 5. Agricultural Impact: Along the southern boundary of the development site is Agricultural Land Reserve. A buffer has been created as part of the Natural Features Development Permit requirements ranging in width from 30.0m at the west down to O.Om at the east. There will be a 2.5m multi-use pathway that runs parallel to this buffer, providing addition buffering to the property located to the south. 6. Traffic Impact: As the subject properties are located within 800 metres of the Lougheed Highway, a referral has been sent to the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure for their approval. 7. Interdepartmental Implications: i) Engineering Department: The Engineering Department requires the following items be addressed: a) Road dedication as required to meet the design criteria of the Subdivision & Development Bylaw No. 4800-1993. b) Utility servicing as required to meet the design criteria of the Subdivision & Development Bylaw No. 4800-1993. c) Frontage upgrades to the applicable road standard. ii) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department: The applicant has worked with the Manager of Parks Planning & Development, Parks & Facilities in conjunction with the City's Environmental Planner to incorporate a multi-use trail on the southern side of the subject properties. 8. Intergovernmental Issues: i) Local Government Act: An amendment to the OCP requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 4 77 of the Local Government Act. The amendment required for this application, conservation boundaries, is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. 2018-289-RZ Page 7 of 8
9. Citizen/Customer Implications: A Development Information Meeting was conducted via the Public Comment Opportunity process from April 18 to April 29, 2022. An additional opportunity for public comment will be provided by the Public Hearing, which will be required prior to advancing this application. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that first and second reading be given to Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7542-2019, that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7543-2019, and that application 2018-244-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. "Original signed by Wendy Cooper" Prepared by: Wendy Cooper, M.Sc., MCIP, RPP Planner "Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Charles Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7542-2019 Appendix D -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7543-2019 Appendix E -Site Plan Appendix F -Building Elevation Plans (Typical) Appendix G -Landscape Plan Appendix H -ADP Design Comments Appendix I -Public Responses to Development Information Meeting and Petition to Council 2018-289-RZ Page 8 of 8
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7543-2019 APPENDIX D A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7 490-2018." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 4 District Lot 405 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 60014; Lot 5 District Lot 405 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 60014; Lot 1 District Lot 405 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 60014; and Lot 2 District Lot 405 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 60014 and putlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1771 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 14th day of May, 2019. READ a second time as amended the PUBLIC HEARING held the READ a third time the day of day of day of , 20 ,20 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this ,20 ADOPTED, the day of , 20 , 20 day of PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIXG "-...tv:-----....,f-.--' / ,r·-·-·-·-,./ ,r-,,.,.,.,/ ,.,,. l I V --ca .. 4) > 0
are an alternative that families can enjoy and actually afford. They are typically better maintained as they are run by strata so the street appeal for the city and public is also generally much more attractive. Thank you for consider affordable housing options for families like this. Sincerely, 2
parking for the new residents of the town homes or will Slatford Street be one big parking lot? Play Area for Children 2} Typically town home complexes attract young families with children. From my review of the proposed development I did not notice that there is a playground for children on the development. Most town homes provide a playground for children and this does not seem to be the case for this development. The developer needs to take this into consideration. Wildlife and the Creek 3} Has City Council and the developer taken into consideration the creek running right behind the proposed development on Slatford and how it will affect the wildlife? I have noticed many variety of birds including blue herons, hawks, eagles, owls and other wild life. Will this new development be putting the wildlife at risk? Has anyone from City Council looked into this and have we invited an officer from the Fisheries and Wildlife department to attend and comment on this development. Existing Trees on the Property 4} At present there are trees on the property that have been marked and are not to be removed. Does the developer know which trees are marked and will Apna be ensuring that these trees remain and are not torn down? Along with the trees that are marked I would like to see the other existing beautiful trees marked and to remain on the property. There are some beautiful cherry trees and other trees that must be at least 100 years old. It would be a shame if these trees were removed. From my review of the developer's existing drawing I don't see much greenery or many trees on the development-just a cluster of townhomes with no character or aesthetic beauty. I would hope that the developer will incorporate more greenery and keep most of the large old pine trees and cherry trees on this property which would add to the beauty of our neighborhood. Once again I have deep concern regarding this development and I would like City Council to reverse this proposed application and keep the original rezoning to single family homes. 101 townhomes on this property seems too excessive. Also please take into consideration the signed Petition and the wishes of the residents already living in the neighborhood and how this development will be affecting them. Looking forward to your response. 2
Kind regards, Email: Phone: This email message and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any use, review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. 3
This area has significant wildlife including Red Tail Hawks, Barred Owls, Northern Flickers, American Goldfinch, Blue Herons, Kildeer, and Eagles. This kind of density of housing will have a significant negative impact on the wildlife. This is a significant number of units and this many units will equate to potentially more than 200 vehicles. It looks like there is a very small number visitor parking spots in the proposed complex and many units look like they only have parking for one vehicle. Slatford cannot accommodate all of those vehicles and Wynn brook subdivison of single family homes should not become a parking lot for these townhomes. The cul-de-sac at creates even more parking challenges. Parking should not be permitted in the cul-de-sac because it will impede emergency vehicle access. I am extremely concerned about there only being one entrance and exit onto Slatford. There are many young children who walk to c'esqenela Elementary and even more will be walking to the Albion Community Centre when it opens. The roundabout at 104 and Slatford is already quite treacherous with many cars flying down 104th and not following the rules for a roundabout. The significantly increased number of vehicles will be very dangerous for pedestrians, many of whom are young children. There should an entrance/exit on 240th street as well. It seems that the setback requests from 7.5 metres to 1.3, from 7.5 metres to 1.05, and 7.5 to 6.0 are not reasonable. I believe that some of these are close to waterways. Isn't there a minimum required setback from streams and creeks to prevent environmental damage and to minimize impact to wildlife? This development will likely have many families in it. It seems from the plan like there is very little greenspace in the complex for children to be in nature. It is also unclear whether there will be trees in this development. Currently there are a significant variety of mature trees that are home to a variety of wildlife. Will any of these trees be preserved? There was a petition opposing this development that had a large number of signatures on it. Was this petition received by the developer and the city? If so, was any consideration given to this? The petition was not acknowledged. I recognize that there is a need for housing but I am strongly opposed to this level of density because there is not the infrastructure to support it and it will have negative impacts on the environment and wildlife. Regards, 2
6· k LS\ K IVAI S 10. ~,, '\t1L .. CCJ1!,,. _V\:'...f/ il,.\YJ Q I t .. ., 12 • I tJ ta V-r \ C. (:.. --. \ \ 18. 1-<),0-rv'-·k \ (...,-. e MPO ZZI\2265183. I -2-' '\ ,,......, /} 7'/ /£-.~ Apn I II/ii ·.1 I d; '2 /111; I
/03rJ.ol 10366 s~/CJT Fo-RJ) PL# 171.JJJ I 03371 I 03 O°/ -& C/6 'ff{_ S-t, PETITION TO STOP PROPOSED REZONING APPLICATION ;Vo,, i201g--~8?~ FROM SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL TO TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL FILE 2018-289-RZ ON SLATFORD AND 240TH. To: Mayor and Council of the City of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 We the undersigned, petition Mayor and Council of the City of Maple Ridge as follows: WE THE UNDERSIGNED WOULD LIKE TO STOP THE PROPOSED REZONING APPLICATION FROM RESIDENTIAL TO TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL ON SLATFORD AND 240TH (THE "SLATFORD PROPERTY") THE SLATFORD PROPERTY WAS ORIGINALLY ZONED FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. THE NEW PROPOSED REZONING IS REQUESTING THAT THE PROPERTY BE REZONED FOR 107 TOWNHOMES. ON AN AVERAGE MOST HOUSEHOLDS HA VE AT LEAST 2 VEHICLES PER HOME. THIS WOULD MEAN THERE WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL 214 VEHICLES/RESIDENTS IF NOT MORE COMMUTING ON SLATFORD ROAD. THE ADDITIONAL PROPOSED HOMES WOULD CREATE BUSY TRAFFIC AND THERE WOULDN'T BE SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR ALL RESIDENTS. WE BELIEVE THAT THE SLATFORD PROPERTY DOES NOT HA VE THE INFRASTRUCTURE TO ACCOMMODATE 107 TOWNHOMES. ALSO THE PROTECTED CREEK DIRECTLY BEHIND THE SLATFORD PROPERTY IS HOME TO QUITE A FEW DIFFERENT SPECIES OF WILD LIFE AND WE BELIEVE THAT THE NEW DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE PUTTING THE WILD.LIFE AT RISK. THE SLATFORD PROPERTY WAS ORIGINALLY SLATED FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND WE REQUEST THAT IT REMAIN AS ZONING FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. By signing this petition, I acknowledge that this petition will become a public document and all information contained. in it will be publicly available. Name Address Date Signature ~ #1L(C.. /{)3 !Lo LU '-f Nlv't..f K u L.'-f-;p_:5 / 17 Lv~ 2. t/#f&A-R2. "2-( ID'dd-0 Wywy It( JU-it #6 / I ~ It MPOZZI\2265183.1 Rz_ ---
-2 -1.\ftJVll\'lic~&uJJ.1 /032~ Z3tl4 S,T , Ulif $-'ICJ~~:._ --J1~--s.~-\-l--~l,W11 ID?a~ 23M~ ,jt)Ly2fl// 1s.J)i01tt1e Wttdclen IDS/~ 11\/yn.,.yk Wry Ju/yZ1;201c;(:;~ul~~ 19.) -·• ) ,,.,_•; \ '\ \ , ~ <hr , tkl'~ _,./ i@il~ C&ttJS Uwt.:J.... Ll· ~·w...-,\LLk .. -1 ·...4..1, LI, r.1 ~/~ MPOZZl\2265183 .1
- 3 -) 23· f\Lfl _v Ri rk MPOZZI\2265183. l
(I 45· k !:,,/(fl tJ i,){,l 49. Alyjia rne1~ 50. [) ... li,.~'7 l'r.. r • l~,~ V\JJn 52. MPOZZi\2265183,I -4 -foZ-; 23 ··· -1 f\!\ft/Ju6· ,fJ 0<21c /DJ....8 Z) 9'-~ & Ir }1t pLASv ~ ~D t,LL 10~0{' 231 tc}-:5t . 'Mav ~.Q. t'd · -z ~ ~ 3 7 / t>:.:S/f Jq-vt~ 'J"h // z 11'_ ff I~ 1£) /E ,, ~.
1103·~••• mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7522-2018 11310 Kingston Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: May 17, 2022 2018-458-RZ cow An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 11310 Kingston Street, from RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) to M-3 (Business Park Industrial), to permit a future subdivision of approximately seven industrial park lots. Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7522-2018 and considered the early consultation requirements for the Official Community Plan amendment on December 11, 2018. There will be future Development Permit applications for the industrial buildings on the subject property. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan land use designation and conservation areas are proposed to be covenanted rather than dedicated, therefore an amendment to the Official Community Plan will not be required. There is sufficient suitable land for park dedication on the subject property, however the City would prefer for some of the park land to be maintained by the owner. Therefore, it is recommended that Council require the developer to provide a combination of dedicated and covenanted land to meet the Park Land dedication requirements under the Local Government Act. It is recommended that Council waive any additional payment in lieu requirement, as sufficient lands are being protected and rendered undevelopable through this development and trails are being provided for public access. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7522-2018 as amended be given second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing; 2. That Council require, as a condition of subdivision approval, the developer to provide a combination of covenanted and dedicated land, in lieu of parkland dedication, in accordance with Section 510 of the Local Government Act, and waive the requirement to provide additional payment in lieu; and 3. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii) Road dedication for a new road (200A Street) running north/south, parallel to Golden Ears Way, to connect Wharf Street to Kingston Street, as required; 2018-458-RZ Page 1 of 12
iii) Road dedication for a north/south multi-use pathway, as required; iv) Road dedication for a pump station located near the intersection of Hazelwood Street and Wharf Street, as required; v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical and Floodplain Report which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the protection of the Environmentally Sensitive areas on the subject property; vii) Registration of a Statutory Right-of-Way plan and agreement for storm drainage and maintenance access; viii) Registration of a Statutory Right-of-Way plan and agreement for public access to the trail network; ix) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management; x) Removal of existing buildings encroaching onto the property; xi) Notification to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Ministry of Environment for in-stream works on the subject property; xii) If the Director of Waste Management from the Ministry of Environment determines that a site investigation is required based on the submitted Site Profile, a rezoning, development, or development variance permit cannot be approved until a release is obtained for the subject property; and xiii) In addition to the Site Profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site. DISCUSSION: 1. BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: 2018-458-RZ B. Smith, Orion Construction Lot 2, District Lot 280 and 281, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan BCP50883 Maple Meadows Business Park Maple Meadows Business Park RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) M-3 (Business Park Industrial) Page 2 of 12
Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Business Park Zone: M-3 (Business Park Industrial) Designation: Maple Meadows Business Park South: Use: Single-Family Residential and Industrial Zone: RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) and M-2 (General Industrial) Designation: Maple Meadows Business Park East: Use: Single-Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Designation: Single-Family and Compact Residential West: Use: Vacant and Golden Ears Way Zone: RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) Designation: Maple Meadows Business Park Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Industrial Business Park 16.6 ha (41.0 acres) New Street (200A Street, to be constructed) Urban Standard 2018-458-DP/DVP/SD and 2019-082-DP 2. PROJECT HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION: Located in South West Maple Ridge, the irregular shaped subject property, located at 11310 Kingston Street (see Appendices A and B) is strategically located for industrial development. It is located near the Golden Ears Bridge and is within the 200-year flood plain of the Fraser River, making it subject to flood construction level requirements for industrial development. Since 2007, there has been interest in developing this property in accordance with its Industrial land use designation. A previous Translink application for a combined bus fleet overhaul facility and heavy equipment training facility (RZ/057 /07) pertained to the southern part of the subject property. Preliminary site preparation in support of this work included the placement of a significant amount of fill. However, this earlier application was withdrawn in 2009. In 2012, the previous property owner applied to rezone the subject property for business park purposes, but the application (2012-031-RZ) expired prior to receiving final approval. Considerable work was carried out as the application progressed, including habitat protection measures, multi-modal trail development, and traffic impact assessments. Road dedication and offsite works to improve local access and alleviate traffic congestion were included in the development details. The current proposal is to rezone the subject property from the RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) zone to the M-3 (Business Park Industrial) zone. This application is based on much of the work of the previous expired application 2012-031-RZ. This earlier work involved public input, and professional consultant services to create a development plan with multi-use trails, watercourse protection measures, stormwater management and road dedication. In addition to providing a pleasant business park work environment, this development proposal aimed to provide multi-faceted community benefits for the local economy, the enviroment, and neighbourhood connectivity. 2018-458-RZ Page 3 of 12
The current proposal builds on this previous work of habitat restoration and trail development to create a campus-style business park composed of seven lots with seven buildings. Five of these buildings (on proposed Lots 3 through 7) will be constructed as multi-tenanted spaces and two buildings (on proposed Lots 1 and 2) will be developed for single-owner occupants. The project includes road dedication along the western perimeter of the subject property, connecting Wharf Street to the south, with Kingston Street to the north of the subject property. 3. PLANNING ANALYSIS: i. Official Community Plan: The subject property is located within the Maple Meadows Business Park precinct, within the Hammond Area Plan of the Official Community Plan (OCP) and is designated Maple Meadows Business Park. The proposed land use and M-3 (Business Park Industrial) zone align well with this designation, which is intended to be an employment generator, accommodating many large, medium and small businesses. The Hammond Area Plan recognizes the subject property as key to transportation planning in south-west Maple Ridge and to the regional highway network due to its location near Lougheed Highway and the Golden Ears Bridge, and states: When the undeveloped lands to the south of 113b Avenue eventually develop, an alternative access to the area will be required. This will be particularly beneficial for emergency access. The Hammond Area Plan also notes the importance of the subject property for fostering multi-modal transportation options, as follows: As the Business Park continues to develop (particularly to the south) and redevelop, opportunities will be identified for creating linkages, where appropriate, for pedestrian and bicycle activity. There are also environmentally sensitive areas within the subject property which are intended to be retained and enhanced. Although these areas would normally be dedicated as Park, under the Conservation designation, an amendment to the OCP will not be required as these areas are proposed to be protected through a restrictive covenant for habitat protection. ii. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from the RS-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) zone to the M-3 (Business Park Industrial) zone (see Appendix C) to permit an Industrial Business Park subdivision (see Appendix D). Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application, as discussed below. Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7522-2018 has been amended to update the reference to the new Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019. 2018-458-RZ Page 4 of 12
iii. Proposed Variances: A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves the following proposed variances: a) Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 4800-1993: • To reduce the collector road standard for the new proposed north/south road (200A Street) from 20m (65.6 ft.) down to 18m (59.0 ft.); • To waive the requirement to upgrade Wharf Street to a collector standard and have the sidewalk onsite via a trail, rather than within the road Right-of-Way, in order to preserve the natural habitat around the Katzie Slough; • To allow the construction of Hazelwood Street to a modified Urban Local Standard; and • Additional servicing-related variances may be required once detailed civil design drawings have been reviewed. b) Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019: • Part 4 -General Regulations, Section 403 Regulations for the Size, Shape and Siting of Buildings and Structures o 403.9 Retaining Wall Height and Developer Built Retaining Walls: • 1. To increase the maximum retaining wall height from 1.2m (3.9 ft.) to 2.7m (8.9 ft.) for proposed Lot 1; • Part 4 -General Regulations, Section 405 Landscaping and Fencing Regulations o 405.3 Landscape Screen and Landscape Strip Requirements: • To increase the maximum fence height of 3.6m (11.8 ft.) up to 4.0m (13.1 ft.); • To reduce the minimum landscape strip width requirement from 5m (16.4 ft.) down to 3m (9.8 ft.) for proposed Lots 3 through 7; • Part 8 -Industrial Zones, Section 803 M-3 Business Park Industrial o 803. 7 Setbacks: • 1. a. To reduce the minimum front setback from 6m (19.7 ft.) to 5m (16.4 ft.) to the architectural columns for proposed Lots 4 through 7, and to 5.6m (18.4 ft.) to the second storey overhang for proposed Lot 4; o 803.8 Height: • To increase the proposed building height from 15m (49.2 ft.) to 15.3m (50.2 ft.) for proposed Lot 1; and o 803.11 Other Requirements: • 2. To allow loading bays in the front yard for proposed Lot 3. c) Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990: • Part IV Off-Street Parking Design, 4.1 a) iii) (b) • To reduce the required maneuvering aisle width from 7 .3m (24.0 ft.) to 6m (19.7 ft.) for proposed Lots 2 and 3. Additional variances may be identified once detailed civil plans have been reviewed. The requested variances will be the subject of a future report to Council. 2018-458-RZ Page 5 of 12
iv. Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: The Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990 has different parking standards for various Industrial uses. Based on the intended uses of warehouse, warehouse storage, or light industrial, the parking standard applied was the more stringent between the warehouse and the warehouse storage uses, which is 1 parking stall per 186m2 of gross floor area. For the proposed office space, which is limited to 25% of the industrial gross floor area, the office parking rate of 1 parking stall per 40m2 of office gross floor area was applied. All of the lots meet the required parking standards, including the maximum number of small car percentage of 10% and the minimum number of accessible parking stalls. Access easements are proposed between proposed Lots 3 through 7 to have shared drive-aisles and reduce the number of access points along the new road. Proposed Lot 6 has four parking stalls located on proposed Lot 7, which will require an additional access easement. 4. DEVELOPMENT PERMITS: The subject property is within the Hammond Area Plan. Policy 3-38 of the Hammond Area Plan states the following: Lands within the Maple Meadows Business Park designation will be subject to existing policies to regulate Business Parks with the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan. As outlined in this policy, Section 8.6 of the OCP will provide the guidelines for the required Industrial Development Permit application to ensure that the form and character of the current proposal meets the needs of industry, through attractive design that is compatible with adjacent development. The Industrial Development Permit report will be the subject of a future report to Council; however proposed site plans and building elevations have been attached for review (see Appendix E). The applicant may opt to do several Industrial Development Permits, depending on the timing of construction, to allow the development to occur in phases and not have the Development Permits expire. The following table summarizes the overall proposed details for the seven lots. The M-3 (Business Park Industrial) zone allows for a lot coverage of 60%, a floor space ratio (FSR) of 0.75, and accessory office use up to a maximum of 25% of the gross floor area of the principal use. All of the lots will comply with these regulations. 2018-458-RZ Page 6 of 12
Table 1 -Summary of Proposed Lot Details Lot Number and Lot Coverage and Industrial Gross Office Floor Area; Parking Required and Lot Area FSR Floor Area (GFA) Percentage Accessory Provided Use Lot 1: 43, 706m2 44%, 0.42 FSR 18,523m2 1,692m2; 9% 143; 145 provided (10.8 acres) (199,386 ft2) (18,213 ft2) Lot 2: 20,586m2 32%, 0.35 FSR 1,692m2 994m2; 16% 59; 59 provided (5.1 acres) (18,213 ft2) (10,700 ft2) Lot 3: 5,606m2 34%, 0.47 FSR 1,981m2 495m2; 25% 28; 33 provided (1.4 acres) (21,324 ft2) (5,328 ft2) Lot 4: 7,295m2 43%, 0.58 FSR 3,219m2 805m2; 25% 43; 43 provided (1.8 acres) (34,650 ft2) (8,665 ft2) Lot 5: 14,647m2 57%, 0.65 FSR 8,368m2 1,118m2; 13% 73; 73 provided (3.6 acres) (90,075 ft2) (12,034 ft2) Lot 6: 20,329m2 58%, 0.66 FSR 12,019m2 1,358m2; 11% 99; 99 provided (5.0 acres) (129,376 ft2) (14,618 ft2) Lot 7: 33,140m2 43%, 0.49 FSR 14,408m2 2,020m2; 14% 128; 129 provided (8.2 acres) (155,091 ft2) (21,744 ft2) Total Site Areas Total Industrial Total Office GFA: After Dedication: GFA: 8,482m2 Total Parking: 145,287m2 60,210m2 (91,302 ft2) 581 (35.9 acres) (648,116 ft2) Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the OCP, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for: • All areas designated Conservation on Schedule "B" or all areas within 50 metres of an area designated Conservation on Schedule "B", or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver Valley Area Plan; • All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent; • All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Schedule "C" to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions. The Watercourse Protection and Natural Features Development Permit will be the subject of a future report to the Director of Planning. i. Advisory Design Panel: The application was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel (ADP) at a meeting held on September 11, 2019, and their comments and the applicant's responses have been attached (see Appendix F). A detailed description of the project's form and character will be included in a future Industrial Development Permit report to Council. 2018-458-RZ Page 7 of 12
ii. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting was held at a church, located at 11391 Dartford Street, on June 20, 2019. Approximately 50 people attended the meeting. A summary of the main comments and discussions with the attendees was provided by the applicant (see Appendix G). The main concerns were around traffic, stormwater management, trail networks, and the impact of the building on the surrounding residences. The applicant has since provided additional details for the road network, stormwater management, trails, and buildings, which will be available for the Public Hearing, should Council forward this report, and finalized through the Rezoning Servicing Agreement. 5. INTERGOVERMENTAL ISSUES: i. Environmental Implications and Parkland Requirements: The subject property contains eight unnamed watercourses and northern and southern portions of the Katzie Slough (see Appendix H). The unnamed watercourses are all tributaries to the Katzie Slough, with the exception of one, which has no surficial connection to the other watercourses. Three of the watercourses have fish presence, and five of the watercourses are nutrient-bearing. The one watercourse that is not connected to the others does not provide fish habitat values. The proposed development will require some displacement or temporary displacement during construction, some infilling, and some re-alignment or replacement of the existing watercourses. Four habitat compensation and four environmental enhancement areas are proposed to improve the quality of both in-stream and riparian habitat, decrease habitat fragmentation and improve connectivity, resulting in no net loss of fish habitat, and net gains at a ratio of better than 2:1 for both in-stream and riparian habitat (see Appendix I). In order to achieve this, offsite compensation works on the adjacent Translink property to the west is required and Translink and their third party contractor must agree to the proposed works and maintenance in order for the compensation measures to be approved. Provincial and Federal permits will also be required as part of the Watercourse Protection and Natural Features Development Permit process. As there are more than two additional lots proposed to be created, the developer will be required to comply with the park dedication requirements of Section 510 of the Local Government Act prior to subdivision approval. For this project, there is sufficient suitable land for park dedication on the subject property; however, the City would prefer for the land to be maintained by the owner. Therefore, it is recommended that Council require the developer to provide a combination of dedicated and covenanted land to meet the Park Land dedication requirements under the Local Government Act. Under Section 510 of the Local Government Act, up to 5% of the land being subdivided may be required to be dedicated as Park or be paid as a cash in lieu equivalent amount. Approximately 1.7% of land is to be dedicated as road for the existing municipal and regional servicing Statutory Right-of-Ways; however, a public trail network will also be provided within that dedicated portion. Approximately 12.2% of land is proposed to be covenanted for environmental protection measures. As this total of 13.9% is above and beyond the 5% parkland dedication that may be required through subdivision, it is recommended that Council waive any additional payment in lieu requirement, as sufficient lands are being protected and rendered undevelopable through this development and trails are being provided for public access. The benefits to the environment and City remain the same through the covenanted and dedicated areas. 2018-458-RZ Page 8 of 12
ii. Provincial Archaeology Branch Two Archaeological Impact Assessments were prepared fdr the previous proposed Translink facilities in 2006 and 2008, as the subject property is located near the boundary of a known archaeological site. Neither of the impact assessments identified any archaeological remains and the consultant did not recommend any further impact assessment. However, both studies recommended that a Chance Find Management Plan be put in place during the construction phase to address the possibility of archaeological deposits inadvertently becoming exposed. Should there be a confirmed chance find discovery, all work in the immediate area would need to be halted until an appropriate Heritage Conservation Act (HCA) Permit is obtained. All applications for HCA Permits are forwarded by the Archaeology Branch to appropriate First Nations for review. iii. Traffic Impact: The 2017 decision to remove tolls from the Golden Ears Bridge has generated significantly greater regional traffic volumes than originally anticipated in the previous applications. The applicant has provided a revised Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) in support of this current proposal which is currently under review as part of the civil design package. The TIA will also be supplemented by Translink's Golden Ears Way Study which is currently underway. The TIA has indicated that there are significant challenges with the existing transportation network and that there is little ability for this development to resolve those issues. Overall capacity issues will need to be addressed at the regional and provincial level; specifically, with improvements to Golden Ears Way and Highway 7. Specific to the intersection of 1138 Avenue and Kingston Street, the worst performing movements include the northbound left-turn and the northbound through movement. Both of these movements can be improved by converting the 1138 Avenue and Kingston Street intersection into a roundabout or signalized intersection with queue detectors for the eastbound off-ramp traffic. As the subject property is located adjacent to Translink Infrastructure, a referral was provided to Translink for review. Translink approval of the Zone Amending Bylaw is not required as a condition of final reading; however, our Engineering Department has reviewed their comments and will address them as required in the civil design stage. A copy of Translink's comments is attached to this report (see Appendix J). iv. City of Pitt Meadows: As the subject property is adjacent to the City of Pitt Meadows, a referral was sent to the City of Pitt Meadows Planning Department for review. A summary of their main concerns and the City of Maple Ridge's responses is provided below. a) Trail Connections: The City of Pitt Meadows responded in support of the pedestrian/cycling connections in the area, but wanted to see more paved trails. There is a mix of gravel and paved trails for the area, in an effort to try to keep the areas as natural as possible. b) Traffic Concerns: The majority of traffic concerns in the area can be attributed to the South Bonson Area and general growth. The connection of Wharf Street to Pitt Meadows through the Katzie First Nations Reserve #1 is not anticipated through this development. 2018-458-RZ Page 9 ·of 12
c) Drainage: Drainage is currently entering Pitt Meadows through the Katzie Slough to the Fraser River. This development is required to implement a pump station to redirect drainage from Hammond while maintaining environmental base flows to the Katzie Slough. d) Dike: This development is not required to upgrade Wharf Street to current dike or flood standards. The development itself will need to ensure that the future buildings meet the flood construction levels to meet the Building Code requirements. 6. INTERDEPARTMENTAL IMPLICATIONS: i) Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has indicated that the following servicing upgrades will be a requirement of this development: • A new urban collector road (200A Street), connecting Kingston Street to Wharf Street; • Urban Improvements to Wharf Street and Kingston Street; • Construction of a drainage pump station, including improvements to the area's storm sewer system; and • Utility servicing as required to meet the design criteria of the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 4800-1993. The new urban collector road between 1138 Avenue and Wharf Street is shown in the drawings as providing a full access connection. Doing so would provide an unfettered alternative emergency access to the lower Hammond neighbourhood; however, further considerations to potential impacts to cut-through traffic are required before finalizing this approach. ii) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department: The Parks, Recreation and Culture Department has requested that the habitat compensation and riparian areas onsite be maintained by the owner of the property, with Statutory Right-of-Ways provided to allow for maintenance of the City's drainage channel, and public access to the trail network. A pedestrian bridge and trail connection to the Golden Ears Off-Leash Dog Park is required. On-street parking will be provided along one side of the new proposed 200A Street to allow for parking for the Off-Leash Dog Park by way of the pedestrian bridge and trail. A trail connection was also required to connect below the Golden Ears Bridge, towards Pitt Meadows in order to make an eventual connection to regional multi-use trails, including the Coast to Canyon Trail. This future trail connection forms part of the Metro Vancouver Greenways Plan and Experience the Fraser route. iii) License, Permits and Bylaws Department: The Building Department has indicated that a Floodplain Covenant and Stormwater Management Covenant will be required, and the Fire Department will need to review the internal access and turning radii. They also recommended that the different permitted uses be considered for parking standards. Other comments will be provided at the Building Permit stage, later in the process. 2018-458-RZ Page 10 of 12
iv) Fire Department: The Fire Department provided their requirements for access design, fire safety plans, and private hydrant requirements. v) Environmental Section: The Environment Section supports the onsite and offsite compensation and rehabilitation measures proposed, as discussed above. Four habitat compensation and four environmental enhancement areas are proposed as part of the project, which plan to improve the quality of both in-stream and riparian habitat, decrease habitat fragmentation and improve connectivity. The habitat compensation strategy proposes net gains at a ratio of better than 2:1 for both in-stream and riparian habitat. Other requirements, such as Stormwater Management and Tree Management Plans will be required as components of this development. As the development is intended to be built out in phases, the developer will be required to have the landscaping completed within two months after each phase of construction is completed. 7. CITIZEN IMPLICATIONS: A Development Information Meeting was held on June 20, 2019, as noted above. Resident concerns raised at that time are attached to this report. A study was conducted on the proposed acoustic barrier between the proposed development and the adjacent residential area. The proposed acoustic barriers will address ground-mounted mechanical equipment and truck activities. The surrounding single-family homes are one to two-storey homes. Based on the general setback distance between the houses and the propose acoustic barriers, the height of the walls would need to be at least 4m (13.1 ft.) tall from grade to provide meaningful noise reduction to the community, which is what is being proposed, but will require a height variance, as noted above. 2018-458-RZ Page 11 of 12
APPENDIX F Tt<.A+D CRAIG TAYLOR M.A.I.B.C. October 31, 2019 City of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Pl, Maple Ridge, BC V2X6A9 Email: dhall@mapleridge.ca Att: Diana Hall Re: Kingston Industrial File No. 2018-458-DP The following resolution was passed in regards to File No. 2018-458-DP at the September 11, 2019 meeting of the Advisory Design Panel. Please forward this information on to the applicant. The Panel noted that the applicant did not consider sustainable stormwater management techniques ie: bioswales.--It was moved and seconded That application 2018-458-DP be supported and the following concerns be.addressed as the design develops and submitted to Planning staff for follow-up: Landscape Comments: TKA+D 1. Ensure that onsite stormwater management is coordinated during the development permit process and that all City departments have reviewed and approved the design so that minimum requirements are achieved; The on-site stormwater management plans have been updated and submitted to engineering for detailed review and comment. Once comments are received back, we will make the required revisions and resubmit a separate report for each development lot. 2. Provide a rational on why stormwater infiltration beyond a tank was not considered; We have revisited the on-site stormwater management planning with input form the geotechnical consultant, and have now incorporated a measure of infiltration into the on-site designs. The infiltration will serve to address Tier A of the City's 3-Tier Stormwater Management Design Criteria 3. Ensure guardrails are provided at trail access point off Kingston Street; Guard rails have been provided where necessary along public trails. 4. Consider painted line crosswalks at Kingston Street trail for all five crossings: Wanstead, Lorne, Ospring, Hampton and Ditton; Painted line crosswalks will be considered in consultation with city staff 5. Provide pedestrian wayfinding at trail and crossings; Wayfinding signs have been provided, see Lll for further information 6. Consider additional shrub planting at foundations of buildings at Lots 4-7, similar in character to Lot 3; Addi~~onal shrub planting that is similar in character to Lot 3 has been added to Lots 4-7. Refer to Landscape drawings. 7. Consider using higher percentage of recommended native plant material to match character of environmental ecological areas; ARCHITECTURE + DESIGN INC. 305-1930 PANDORA STREET VANCOUVER BC I V5L OC7 I P. 604.569.3499 I E. MAIL@TAYLORKURTZ.COM I W. WWW.TAYLORKURTZ.COM
TKA+D Plant material has been reviewed and higher percentages of native plants have been added. Refer to landscape drawings. 8. Consider planting Hemlocks in more sheltered locations on site and consider an alternate species at building facades; Hemlocks have been moved to an alternate location in some cases, and swapped for an alternate species in others. Refer to Landscape drawings. 9. Consider adding berms in Lot 7 Amenity area at circuit path to increase screening and visual interest; Berms have been added to Lot 7 amenity area. Refer to L9.1. 10. Consider concrete attenuation fence; Sound attenuation fence will be concrete material or a suitable alternative. To be determined in conjunction with a sound engineer. 11. Cross section F -plant material seems low growth, consider substituting with taller growing plant material to screen ,the attenuation fence. Pl.ant material and graphics have been reviewed. Some larger shrubs have been added as well as a larger shrub graphic for the section. Due to the smaller amount of soil available trees are not advised. Architectural Comments: 1. Provide updated landscape cross sections of context from closest proposed building corner to property lines; Please refer to Landscape drawings for cross sections of context on sheets L16-L20 2. Update architectural drawings to indicate neighbouring context ie: neighbouring houses; Please refer to architectural site plan showing existing neighbouring houses. 3. Enhance shadow study to show existing houses and bridge context; Please refer to shadow studies on sheet ASOO showing existing houses and Golden Ears bridge. 4. Building corners facing neighbouring property lines should be further scaled ie: horizontal or vertical line work/materials; The use of dark wall paint on the concrete tilt panels and reveal lines break up the overall height of each building. The corners of the buildings facing the neighbouring residential areas are 33' -8" to top of parapet, 10' -0" lower than the top of parapet for the rest of the building in lots 5-7, which primarily face Hazelwood. S. Articulate the roof line of the south fa~ade of building Lot 7; Roof line of the south fa~ade of Building 7 is articulated through the use of dropping the 3'-0" glazing strips 11-0" below the top of parapet. By dropping the height of the glazing, the roofline undulates and forms breaks along the top of parapet, while maintaining the rhythm of the fa~ade design. 6. As previously noted, historical reference and character as identified within the Hammond Area Plan has not been reflected in the design. Please refer to Landscape drawings for details on sheet Lll. \ \ \ \ I ! I I / i I Kindest Regards Craig Taylor Architect President Document, 3 1
APPENDIXG I _/ Kingston -Summary of Development Information Meeting Project: Date and Time of Meeting: Kingston Industrial Thursday June 20th, 2019 7:00 pm -9:00 pm Venue of Meeting: Open Door-11391 Dartford Street Attending Graeme Clendenan -AQ Development Heidi Martin -AQ Development Lisa Jones -Taylor Kurtz Architecture Jessica Thiessen -Krahn Landscape James Lee -Bunt Engineering from Project Team: John Morley-AQ Civil Craig Taylor -Taylor Kurtz Architecture Meeting Style: Boards were set up in main hall with members of the project team in attendance to discuss the project and listen to concern and feedback. Approximately 50 people from the community were in present. Many discussions were held and all attendees were encouraged to fill out comment cards regarding their thoughts on the project. Summary of Feedback: All comments received are submitted as part of the package. There were four primary concern raised by the community. 1) Traffic A consistent message delivered by the group in attendance was regarding their concern with the proposed connection of the Kingston Road extension to Wharf Street. The community was concerned that this nex connection would become a popular route for traffic that becomes congested along 113b. It is our understanding that the connection has been required by City Staff, due to the requirement for another emergency access point into the neighbourhood. The project team is willing to discuss this connection with City Staff in more detail to find a solution that does not negatively impact the existing neighbourhood. 2) Storm Water Management Due to the existing poor water management around on the site the concern is the proposed development will increase these problems. The project team is committed to providing a detailed solution for both the sites storm water management, but also in providing an infrastructure upgrade to the neighbourhood with the support of a DCC credit. 3) Trail Network The community requested additional details on the design and maintenance of the trail networks both within and surrounding the site. Similar requests were received by Advisory Design Panel. Further details, material selections etc. will be provided as part of the 2nd reading application for Council 4) Building orientation, setbacks, lighting, and noise. Some concerns were raised regarding the type of buildings and the potential for impact on the adjacent residential areas. These concerns are shared by the project team and we are actively working on further details and product selections to present to Council. We look forward to continuing these discussions with the community as we refine our proposed industrial employment area. Sincerely, Graeme Clendenan Senior Development Manager-Aquilini Development
11310 Kingston Street
Community Meeting -Comments
Comment# Summary of Concern
1 Concern over increased traffic in the residential neighbourhood due to
connection of Kingston Street extension to Wharf Street but allowing access
Concern over increased traffic in the residential neighbourhood due to
2 connection of Kingston Street extension to Wharf Street. Nd sidewalks and
lighting is poor in the neighbourhood.
1) Concern over increased traffic through the Hammond Neighbourhood
3 due to connection of Kingston extension to Wharf Street. 2) Concern over
the height and size of the proposed buildings relative to the residential area
3) Would like access to information on line as the project progresses.
1) Agree with the development. 2) Concern using Kingston St as thru road
4 along Wharf Street due to the age of the streets in the Hammond
Neighbourhood. If the city wants
1) Concern over increased traffic due to connection of Kingston extension to
5 Wharf Street. 2) Concern over the height of the proposed buildings relative
to the residential area and the walls that will surround the development.
Concern over increased traffic in the residential neighbourhood due to
6 connection of Kingston Street extension to Wharf Street. No sidewalks on
Lorne, Ditton, Wharf
7 Concern about open ditch along back of properties on Ospring.
8
Concern over increased traffic in the residential neighbourhood due to
connection of Kingston Street extension to Wharf Street
9 Concern over loading bay locating on Lot 1 facing residences on Ospring St.
10
1) Green Roofs to deal with rainfall, concern over flooding 2) Green space
pathways connecting to Pitt Meadows 3) Concern with connecting to
Kingston Street to Wharf Street.
1) Concern with amount of greenspace and maintaince of that space. 2)
11 Concern regarding access to Hammond Neighbourhood through connection
from Kingston to Wharf Street.
12 Concern regarding access to Hammond Neighbourhood through connection
from Kingston to Wharf Street.
1) Concern about storm water management 2) Concern for ongoing
maintenance for landscaping 3) Connection of pathways and trails south of
13 Kingston, Bike Lane to 113b 4) Room for recycling infrastructure
14 Trail Along Metro SRW to be bikable
Response to Concern
Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along Wharf
Street to the residential neighbourhood.
Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along Wharf
Street to the residential neighbourhood. Residents proposed solution is a gate on Wharf Street
that can be unlocked by emergency vehicles.
1) Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along
Wharf Street to the residential neighbourhood. 2) Further sections will be created showing the
change in elevation and planting elements between residential and industrial. 3) Will discuss
with the City of Maple Ridge on how to make information more accessible to residents.
2) Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along
Wharf Street to the residential neighbourhood. Residents proposed solution is a gate on Wharf
Street that can be unlocked by emergency vehicles.
1) Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along
Wharf Street to the residential neighbourhood. 2) Further sections will be created showing the
change in elevation and planting elements between residential and industrial.
Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along Wharf
Street to the residential neighbourhood.
Discussion required with Environmental Consultant and City Environmental Group to see if
drainage can be located underground.
Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along Wharf
Street to the residential neighbourhood.
Sections will be created and analyized to show how the proposed development will be situated
and correspond to the exisiting neighbourhood.
1) Civil consultant has designed and is refining storm water management plan, in order to meet
Maple Ridge Bylaws. We believe green Roofs are not economically feasible. 2) Pathways will
have planting on either side 3) Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding
restricting traffic along Wharf Street to the residential neighbourhood.
1) Civil consultant has designed and is refining storm water management plan, in order to meet
Maple Ridge Bylaws. 2) Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding
restricting traffic along Wharf Street to the residential neighbourhood.
Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along Wharf
Street to the residential neighbourhood.
1) Civil consultant has designed and is refining storm water management plan, in order to meet
Maple Ridge Bylaws. 2) Further discussion required to Maple Ridge to determine property lines
and responsibilites for maintenance post warranty. 3) Pathways through development will be
accessible for bike and pedestrian traffic. 4) Each building will have garbage and recycling
facilities within its footprint.
Trail will be bikeable.
1) Fire Access to Area, keeping traffic out of residential area 2) Storm Water 1) Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along
15 management 3) Use Kingston for access and regress to Building Area 3) Wharf Street to the residential neighbourhood. 2) Civil consultant has designed and is refining
Directing noise away from residential area storm water management plan, in order to meet Maple Ridge Bylaws 3) Sound attenuation
walls are designed between industrial and residential uses.
16 1) Traffic concerns 2) Prefer purchase of building as long term business+ 1) Bunt Engineering is engaged on the project to propose solutions for City of Maple Ridge's
employees in area. review. 2) Buildings will be leased, but long term leases will be available.
1) Lighting 2) Drainage 3) Noise 1) Light design will be designed to minimize light polution 2) Civil consultant has designed and is
17 refining storm water management plan, in order to meet Maple Ridge Bylaws 3) Sound
attenuation walls are designed between industrial and residential uses.
18 1) Noise 2) Lighting 3) Drainage 4) Traffic See previous responses.
19 Concern regarding access to Hammond Neighbournood through connection Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along Wharf
from Kingston to Wharf Street and its impact on the existing Street to the residential neighbourhood.
Should be no access at Wharf Street and New Kingston to allow commuter Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along Wharf
20 traffic. Concern for increased traffic through Hammond. Vehicle access to Street to the residential neighbourhood. The intention of the development is to have access to
the proposed industrial site should be from old Kingston Street Only. the new buildings from old Kingston St.
21 Concern over traffic management Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along Wharf
Street to the residential neighbourhood.
22 Asking if AIG would be interested in purchasing waterfront property
23 Concern regarding access to Hammond Neighbourhood through connection Further discussion is required with City of Maple Ridge regarding restricting traffic along Wharf
from Kingston to Wharf Street and its impact on the existing Street to the residential neighbourhood.
Q]
· I I I
C0 1MMENT CA.RD·
KA+D
TAYl,.OR KURTZARCHITE.CTURE+Ol:S!GN ING
.j ..
RE: Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street -ha.r..r'. B.Lt(
~vu 5 L \-r~ \f 1anow~ ~ rte ····~······., .. . ,. . ..
(t' 'J..,-\-• ;<1 "'-~ qa.:\--e it)-J(ee>~ (es , cJe.~-+ . . .. SO\.~~ .
Pie.as. e ~ate that all ~o. · mmen. t dnd ~ttenda. nee sheets producecl a~ a result of th!s De~elopme. nt .:nfi. D .. rmat1on ... N'!.et1t1?g. · wit,~-)
b.e prowded to the City of Maple Ridge and form part of the pu!Jltc record that 1s aw;ulabfe for v1ewmg by the publfc uport ·
request.
CONTACT INFORMATJON (Optional)
Name: Tei: · ~mail: __
_.,/
' ~ ) e,fVle(~ e:Y\ c J ll cc e .s s 't{>r f o \Ice-/ .f>,J-e / A~b\(
! .
tl
i
' '
t
)
EJ
I LI I·
COMMENT CARD KA+D
RE: Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street
TAYLOR. KU.HiZARCHffECTlJRE+ DESIGN ING
·-\A.~{:;~
\ \ I . , .. ,~.---·\ [) \ l )) ,AA··, t '.·,.· /i'.t.'"' .. , ,····: ,. " ... ' .[·· ·.·· "-·-· , .. \I· ~1-.. " •.. ,' t ... c,J .. .'j ... ·~+
, () \l,) · -c<H . \ 1J .,, \,J : .,. , . . 1 d (.(Y f .J VL c·'"·\ tf · 1 fy;,.(> · · · ·· · · · · , · ·· · · .,. · · . C', .-., , i~ -r,.(·~.J __ -; ((?~-~ .... , ..:/·~~·~., . (··(· .: ... ~. \.. t I· i,·,,~ .. 1 . /" \ .
· J, "·(/~:C,,J\/'\ ~: l(,,\_1;: 1., •• §\ \ \.'i:-t~ .. [C. i \~{e· .. '\C -:,:i(\t./\!v\r.:(' t)t.~ .... \c(::JJ}
Please note that all r;omment and attendance sheets produced as a result of this Development Information Me?ting wi/Jt
be provided to the City of Maple Ridge andf orm part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon. )
request. () \ ( J ,_.
CONTACT INFORMATION (Ooti'onal)1
J
Name:·~ \ TeJ:1
-· maH: -~-~----------
? C} } r'. [. -.0) r \ l r < ~ ....> _q ' l --L
'f
D
11 I I COM;MENT
TKA~HD
TAYLOR KURTZARCHITEOTUREt DESIGN INC
RE; Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street
COMMENTS:· t·'1. l {, l: r,1 I Pl C\,.{Jlf}T~.¢ 5; J (,. l,,J
{) ' .. ,.,· 1: . . . ·. ('' . . . . s . . . . , .• r· . .. . /J . (' ·. . . ,·J ·• . . /) . . . . '"' l/\) }-J·0\··· L ·rw;·_){f}1~·,,;J/y1,.f>£~5 /;..J {-/v':r,[1 flQ,J-.)/),f, ·/(fc~Ji_.,J ··t-rf1v ·~.,.)r·s t)l l.f1jc/)lltJr~,.J 1~4.i~··'l/Nti ..... /r--:J 'J{//f,,t:{,~1··:1
l [-f \[1· 1 "' N l! l i,., 1 r lf:t0,,1_J1-.l/ o I}/) 1"1 tnt-, iJ i:.... ft+ 1 s lo,-.J I-' c ( d I u."1 fJ:'Jy.,1 fl. u > 0 ""t'-H i£t c. I N,.O , .. , 11 If c J ,r:i
. . a . . . f) . I) . . . ./J .r; . c· ,-:.: . ,r--r_-~-, .. ,"· .~ (' .· ·.-· . . 0J l ""L:-· f);.:~·;·· (,i,'t1r1 u· t~),) L+· l) /~{4"t u !LlVlf'-·· vj,...J /) f / l""j.,lflt-l" ... ,tA? t"~ r6 r-t Ll 1,"'" t11H· ;t /C tvli r·1: I l) I I AF
t ··f ·:""' ... ·. d\ . . () I) ' ·(';...{~ h U\t'v~) [-~·~J !.(<'I , ({ l"'f LA.Ji ,) ,( ~/ ( f )~f.l{ $1 ~ .J LJ I )~r··· T0 / ;,,,J., . c, (J l .. i~lt·"Ji,y:. A ,,.oJ:~}, P I } LfW' f/Jt;;)if' ")l J),:c I f /J\Jfi U. )c:·Lr /~iJ}. L rrt r,h""
t '.'t .,~ 11 l J, ~ilf.t-: .. )/ 'L{s· Vf'rr 1 lJ .. -:/J 1,.t
()r ft~itxV~)iA,t,.(t b t}-:;:, (t/ort~,J/t-r-l r l r~)/')t .. () . fj r;Vr c'~ ;1]:!f\J~ ,~-~1-l~tL1.,F l"ifvf-; .. ,/ lr/
Please note that all comment and attendance sheets produced as a.. re$ult of this Development Information M'eeting will 1 ~ ·
. -
be provided to the City of Maple Ridge andform part of the publf c record that is availableJor viewing by the public µpon
request.
CONTACT INFORMATl9N (Optionat)
Name: Te. I: Em a ii=-------~----------'-
[]
I I I
COMMENT CAHD KA+D
TAYLOR KURTZARCHJTECTURE+OESlGN INC
RE: Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street -........ -r·--\ .. / ,,.. ' \ ,,_ 1 ... } ·"~.. _ ... ,,., . t. .. '"'.: ... '\ .. . .... ... .. . :· ..... "("''''' . _.,, •· ..... COMMENTS: __ __. ... -.-· ... .,.. · \ \1 t. t; t J ~ \ Ct \ \ ·--~~) \. ' : .. c ... {
i {'•t, \ , .. ~\.
{ .
.• <. .. J
L1 ')\ ~-\---·k\
t. \ . -·-'{'''\",.'\ \
(-',
.A-
,..,. '':'I. , .'! ..... ,. . . ·~"··---/"':'' ···-•. , .. ,.,. --··· ,'l'f" ; , •• ,, ..... ""' . ~ .. ,,. . ...~,. \
~ ,,
( ) __ f\ ( ) __ /_ ' .• .....t __ ·_ ~,...., < ... _>_,"'" __ -_ -_-......... __ . ., _\ • · )· ·. ____ i r ·_· ___ -, _·_____ _ \ -·· ··~'>".... ·: f Ci\/\/'") \ ( J _ _____ _(· _________ ,_-· __ ·~------_ ·___ \, / .,,,;::., -,;,...._ -.;;;, -\~, _--·· \.._. . _·\.. ___ -·-_2,.....,-______.J,_.. ~ ...... ----· ..... !,.__.....,,;:""";,~; .. --~~~-,. • . .,,, ~ .· . ,.... • ..... -~ \ ... .> i( .:,
-, \ . . . ~ . , ,, ,, --. . J t\ . ~J b n LYJ<",. G ('.;~--~ C,v ~ "-Q { Y:-:-"' +-r> .· . \~ \ cf') Cj ""'~ -k)n
i
\
~ \ ( •i
. -->~/·) c\, t . cb C.. \·::: :· (-·1 _ _ . \ L ,. _-f ) .... ).. r· \ .,.~ ·l -,_ ---· ·····' V\ _) ...... \ \· .... ·1 ·(:"} 1 y ~ ..... ~-.. ·-·\: "?,i ""'\ \/ \. ~ \,.L . ._," ( 1 ( j c.x ,--.... -· '{ ·\{\ ( '.}'-~ .') \.
. • • . ..... . . ,\,((•;:: . . . (;; • ....,;p .. . ~ "· • -~·~ .• ~... '"-···' -,.'1....... ' • ) ·-. • • . • l, •.. ; .( ~....... . ............. , '"'-4:,!'"',;' (
Please note that all comment and attendance sheets produced as a result Qf this Df;!velopment Information Meeting w/11 )
be provided to the City of Maple Rldge and form part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon .. ,
request
CONTACT INFORMATION (Optional)
Name.:... ..._. ___ Tet: Email: .... -r
i: \v f r t~( t . \,,.;., ~ ' f ri J. --r 1 ' ~! ~ . \ ? --·-·~ (\~ ) . .-> r \ -! 1 \ l. I 'J-l ·, ,,. ~ \j '\' Cl \_y __ 1·. \.1 ' \\,) v. i ry ·~ '../ ~---~ { \ :a:~ \.; .. / :--, l "'· ? > \· 0t .~ '',JJ \ ('-d ·,. __ ), \.;.,.f ,__.. •... ,.;_..,-:,). ~ \\,__j.· / (_ -~ .,.J ~) (._.1 ..--.<. \) ·~ i .J r; \ .. ,; r-' ( ~ \) ,.~l. \) / I 1/ ' j n __ l; 0~ ...... _ ,,1 1f~ _)f u -~ i ·-T ;l ( t ~) . .-, / I. .. -:-r } \ t ~ t\ \; \.. \<\ '"-{ d' ~< .~ r\ LL I ~' \ c.__..;, ~ / \ ~--~,
(]
I I ~rKA+D
TAYLOR KURTZARCHITECTURE+ Df;$JGN INC COM:MENT CARD . . ' . .
RE: Proposed DeveJ'opment at 11310 Kingston Street
COMMENTS: Loi"\Jt.~ HitMMt,tJf'.J 1; :S f\$ H-\('-A.\ L1····· t-l<~)-~) L;,,J ~. 7-~-{ L.,Ort;:.
() F. ,C.1µl \ L t ~ cu 1'<.~~1.5" .. ..., f"L"l ~4,Jr· ~1 t""tYr C}f.;;. T(;:_A· F:·\F t c_ t .....,i ·p,.~ E ~~8#ir
A-~i) '"·rHE' lt_Oi>Tlf<.) ~ (.)~=· r~-tl ~'::) \)E-,.,{,t5i'\...{H:'.)(V"\'~""'' r ~t{H.J4, b (:,;_');f~f?,~:··r"t.>··j \;;,,.lc ... l<.8~-se~ Ta-t (~\,-:7 •
v·1J l T' t-\ <) U r T"H E j ;V\ bvV\. {.;r.J .,... .. ~·r·, C) ,...j i)·.f 'S} D tvVA~c le. ~ AND r&.i4r ~+:. f a(_ C.k L.t~\ t .v ,.. Qi._j
A;c c 5 T·(~ Ee~ ~ . tv)f,:=.£:c,:. 1ci~)_1 . Tt-1 ~£ R~rrs ~,,,-1.~1-l c ~I 5lt ~?TJ 1 ~J J~~:ief,~,.a .• ~· l,i
J\:'L.$[> g·Gt-t Ti-14~,r r;.,, f-f Ft <e} ·r-f'f' OF 'U.;\·...;:·.s-e U.11 \ ! 1·~, i"' "(..,:.•v.\ \.:.· ){ ··-::,. i ... ~ r~ .,..... li4c·
r---,e, <o.\-( Ba·vf2.. l~ 0 -0 D <f. fi.'.:..\f-j Do )~.\t:Yf'' F1-r '-~) A,c 'R.f:-:5 tD~~rr\A··<~ A-l~t?.A··' Pvtt1 ~t:> t)f?
<.~' Li WA.zt.l-5:::, , ... ~c) \"",fDMG;:C}'\,V ..... ~ 1-t k ... G "--){} r
Please note that all comment .and attendance sheets produced as a result of this Development !~formation. Mee.ting will ')
' .
be provided to the City of Maple Rfq.ge and form part of the public ri:$,:;ord that is available for viewing by the publk upon
request. ·:;;e)L u T ... 1 C;) ;,•..J T6 \ .s
CONTACT INFORMATION (Optional)
Name: _ ..... Tel: _____ ~~-
D
11 ,I: ,11
COMMENT CARD KA+D
TAYLOR KURTZ ARCHITECTURE+ DESIGN INC
COMMENTS: zy .. -,fi u~r r~ -' ,,,. ~,
v·~.~,r '-,,,,,~c-
. ·"'~: ·-·:, ,,,
c:ry"\.
Please note that all comment and attendance sheets produced as a result of this Development Information Meeting will
be provided to the City of Maple Ridge and form part of the public record that Is available for viewing by the public upon
request.
CONTACT INFORMATION {Optional)
Name: " , __ .... ,y>-) , ,u .. ~.----..... &::'. Tel: EmaH: ~ \ =-~ ,1 ......... ~~-....... --... ..... ~
D
I 1 ·
COMMENT CARD TAYLOR KURTZARCHITECTUREt DESiGN tNC-
HE: Proposed Developrnent at 1:1310 Kingston Street
COMMENTS: 'Y' t'\Y) :i E,~Y) '---CJ~\ki ~~~ \.) ~\j\ ~~ CJ~<z,~ DU<::_,\~
~~~\s:s\~ ~~ ~S: ·=s:N~:,\1~~~~\Li~c; ~~~:,\.) ~SS, er~:. ,· · ~ ~ ... ,. ~~ \ ~ <~ '\ ~e '. ~\ ~~ :-~ \\ \'\\ ~ ·. ~·~· \~\~
~~~\\\~~ Si\ n\~~>0\~~ ~~~~ x~~ ~u~~'\J\\ti~
1:L~<::3;\~~ ~~ 3\\~> ~-,\"\:S$:)'j\~~~\ ~y-C)~~
~~\~~'\\~\. ~\\~~~.~\~, .
Please note that all comment and attendance sheets produced as a .result .qf this Development Jnformetion Meeting wlll
be provided to the City of M'aple Ridge and form part of the pu.blic record that is available for viewing by the public upon )
request
CONTACT INFORMATION (Optional)
Name: . ·7e .) Tel1 tmau: -~--.....,,
[]
I I I
COM.:MENT CARD l~KA+1D.
TAYLOR KURTZARGHITECTURE+DESIGN INC
RE: Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Str~et
·~ ~·· ~,-,~ . ....., ··.C"\.'.::.\l~,(::.~ ~Q,·,\",."~\
COMMENTS: >, \ ·. ~'(\ ~' t-·>~ ~ s:-')~ ~"-> \~:\ ~ ~ ~-Y\'\: ___ )c:j'-J .. ..
"3:\-\s:s ~~ ~~\. ~~N~~\~~ TC2 \:.\\?\\l'r-,
3\:\~·, £ D\EJ\';:{\ \ \?\\. ~~\\_ \~~s:>\\S~U
:SSJS\~&\ ~ \~ s:>~b~ ~\~-\Dt)~~~\JD
C2~\j~~C:::&_;~=··-\~~~ ~L~~\~s-(~~=-• (\\')\\_ r~~·',_ .. ,
l~~ "..: ~\ · \ (~~\. ~li,.. \ "\ \\ C' u~D \~t)\_~'y\:L0"-0JV~ .............. -· '--__________ _
Please note .that all comment and attendance sheets produced as a result of this Development Information Meeting will
be provided to the City ofMaple Ridge and form part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon
request.
CONTACT INFORMATION (Optional)
Name:; . _ _ _ . . ~ Tel: , Email: . _______ _
)
'll,
[]
I :I I
COM 1 MENT CARD , TKA+D
TAYLOR KURTZARCHITECTURE+ DESIGN INC
RE: Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street
COMMENTS: I \.;:tr l, ::, ' '!. -:::::..t. ""'t '>, ,......., ' '\ • V l:, I ' '-" --\ •. ' .-.,-~.--;---·-··...........,":---'··'-· -------
Please note that all comment and attendance sheets produced as a result of this DevelopmenOnformation Meeting will )
be provided to the City of Maple Ridge andform part of the public record that Is ava1/ablefor viewjng by the publlc upon
re.quest.
CONTACT INFORMATlON (Optional)
Name: ~ trel: _ _ gmail: ------........-....=---...i..~-
E]
I I' I
CO,MMENT CARD
TA'fLOR KURTZARCHlTECTURE+ DESIGN INC
RE: Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street
COMMENTS: --------------------------------------~ r:;rr~.£#'\ roof Jo dt?&:i.J L111·+-l1 cu1d f/laj~~Do+ (A-l-·o ov
~"""~:·-. . .., . . \. \ ~ "\,. ,. .-.. .. . . -~ ~-!~ ·-. _. " .. C........ -~: ' ,. ~ j.
J~iJ c)(:!_~().t t~""~~L -~cA.-t A c1!\(:l;-,l<~, cJ -, -· ·t VYl..f2,--
(\ J i: " .-~~T-"""' I • '..<. .,,..._. · . . ,, , /~ • < -. • '. • J "'-.. 'l:c ( .---iJ" .;I"""~ t
(s:.'1--.• "·' /·r:J l'J i~· · -..,~~ ,, ""\/'1 E'"'" "') · ~\. (.,..JC'~,,L,,t. .. Y \. \ :, CA..,;,v\ . \ · l I ~ ,.,.'C,"" "\. ) l 1( ' (. &--" i"" --.. ---·-· ..... f \.
.,.. ;t ' ' ' . . . --~ -·. • j ~ ,, .,_, ,. ) ,,.,r. ~,/\_ ,<w' ,.,• . • r4 -.. -
. tl r+-Cjl'll.~ CC>f1N.:t_:-1 +9-CJi.t_rl ~)L J-u ·f:. }DU.P) ~ ...
[V()C) jj\/\(A___~~li -~·9r -~~ (~ d. ees~2-0p.--~ --~¥\ A-.· f)V\ou (d he_
CL. "i1Lc etft \a\ ~\o< -i,,11.fV\.. l)o+ , ~Y-~W?.fc Jf\iL.. -frJ 0kq::)
f;1:;;;'~;:~hat a?c~nt anJ~i~;;r:ctr::?;J,o'fuc~ g a r~ilt of this oiv:pment Jnfo~~ation M~e:ing will .
.be provided to the City of Maple Ridge and form part of the p.ublic record that ls available for viewing by the public up9n
request., . rf·lavt(
CONTACT INFORMATION (Optional)
Name: , ·-.. ;i·-··,, . ..J ,,. ••. -, ···· Tel: Ema if::._
\.
~
I I I TKA+D COMMENT CARD
RE: Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street
TAYLOR KUR.TZAA.CHffECTURE+ DESIGN INC
COMMENTS:·
Please note that all comment and attendance sheets produced as a result of this Development Information Mee,ting will )
be provided to the City .ofMap/eRldge and form part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon
request.
CONTAC~ 1INFORMATJON (Option~,I)
Name> Tel:· Email: ~""'· . . ... ··-··
\
E]
I I I
·COMMENT
RE: Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street
TAYLOR KURTZMGHITEGTURE+ DESIGN INC
COMMENTS: --------------------------------
C.:P';>vce=;~_,?t/5 Lf-'/f-t::P-c/ Y 77{/i-:PFtR_ -J9-.]T-//_;;[ cf /b-/,4) ,_
_/s_//l/6 7' ~-· I 0)/(_,,/' ~ ·//.J_t 0 /<?·· /(_./ ~• ~':. ~--5i ~
Please note that all comment and attendance sheets produced as a te$ult of th/s Development Information Meeting will
be provided to the City of Maple i:Udge andform part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon
request.
CONTACT INFORMATION (Optional)
Na mt\ _____ ......... _~~~--:---Te' · nail: ·-·---
~
I .I
COMMENT CARD TAYLOR KlJRTZARCHITECTURE+ DESIGN INC
/ :>i· i ' I ' '?;·· f I • , .. , . ,'-·. \ (-·. I , ''. I; ) ;' / If)
i J;t· i . I { .···; .~--/7/t-·· /Yl -~:;{,. {pv1,r/1,-··') . ,r
({) 'i I li/1 I
~ ;:--,,c~. ·. . ~) 1·~··\c.·--.-.,·::----~. -·:/\_., I . , ·-,,~· \,-·• 1· • .,~.> ;-~/~ •1 . hi.-. .-//,., ·;,.,/, //c
·_ .. · .. ;;_, ... :_,,.·. \J_.· ·. · /~., __ . · ( .l] -(' lJ-.f_.-' .. l}. t. ::{ . t:1 ( ,--. ~ .. ·, ·.. 7 ! · /L(/} t,, l. j(L{P ... /: ... f/ ;:{; 1,/··· .l.·.. -f ~Jct.<t. It '.\.· .. · • .~ ,{ ~-,, ' _.. I' . /_., ... V j ... ,.,.-!'. ( r,; , ) f; l;,,. . . ·· ... •.r", ;:~~r~te thgt~I b~~~~q\ ~J&~ihLn~~I ~~~~ts r~u~V!Iasltfetf:J :hl\~Sett{fff~:t::,ri1U51~~1~~;t)~~~;i~
~ ... /-"
)
be provided to the City Qf Maple Ridge and form part. 9-if. _th .. _e_·. p. ublic :e~ord t~ __ at 1.·.·_:._-:t_ v_. ailabl:f_o_. '_, vievy. in-~7_·· b_Y/_ h.e p.L~-b. !,_._ic_ -_.u_._ p .. __ ~r_; _·
request. · t4'1t.7! /yj)/) j)tC(t, 77) . ! / j /5 , j{J((~trf' rt}· · · Ii I ii' ,.,. I . ..-. (/rl ./ ,.·· ···r ---~.
-·-~-"'----······} \ . . . ::::i )
CONTACT INFORMATION {Optional)
Name-:~ _Tel: Email· ···
EJ
I I I "fKA+D
COMM:ENT CARD TAYLOR KURTZARCHJTECTURE+ DESIGN INC
RE: Proposed DeveJopment at 11310 Kingston Street
COMMENTS: ·----------------------------,------------
............ ~ ....... -:S{y t.11 [(2 /' ~... t:J. / . .'L,... · t,. /, ) . jl
Please note that all comment and attendance sheets produced as.a result ofthis Oevelopment Information Meeting will
be provided to the City of Maple Ridge and form part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon
request.
CONTACT INFORMATION (Optional}
Name: Tel: Email: --------
E]
..
~ I 1: I KA+,D
COM.MENT CARD TAYLOR .KURTZARCfilTECTURE+ DESIGN INC
RE: Proposed Development at l.1310 Kingston Street
-:1
coMMENrs, corV5' 1111/l ·nJd..Jt.dUb 'N rJ?-tl!L P&r'/ li:f3oli f ...
1/:(!_{'fi_G,$ ·70 14.tt.£/J -. ~,p ·T!Y{)A0C O r:F &cJJ:l&1C l)c!lf
(3 d 1 /j())J;Jfl. It. cJF 0or1r:tztt t11 dd!zlfd.£41.f .._ .
L4c;4.:ic ... ~,f/U6.~·<; ,[D/\J .·. ~ .. ~. Hie._ /fJC1c~5 S tbvll £_4-a,de:.·7.51
Ll) ·· 11~1.)L4Jb Ad4A -rpy 70 '?2/,tt.4e'{; /VCJ5:t:£
J!2;2() ft1 ?L rlf' ·172 77}£· £.; () /61. "-5 L j) ,e:: ,.__. ~o.,,r.) 'j rf:(_L() L
Tl:iK CL 7Y 'Sr.~ ~ h£1/Lctc ,YcJ:4 ... 17). ... M ... '7d41.)(; .C,.
'l'!'11t-'I ·/ 11 £ .CJ~ otfJ 0 £ :fl !')/f,r1:_ 1 / J LJ 1 J ,:;-: . . . . . . . . . Pfedsl note that all comment! 6Jrt1 aftendance shee'fs prodace.cf11s1/rrls(/t(ojtlus Development Jnformatwn Meetmg will
be provided to the City of M~ple Ridge and form part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon
request.
CONTACT INFORMATION (Optional)
Name:_ ..... 1 TeL Em a 11: . ..,,.,......~. ---.. -
QI]
I I I <ArKA+D
COMMENT CARD TAYLOR KURTZ ARCHITECTURE+ DESIGN INC
RE: Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street
tl-t(;){fn.
:uln~l ~9J:~. a~?1~4.~i ~~ kUwna0Ysr ~~.
. \\ (1G IL.7.A,£,/ ~ ~ ~ ~}-.f'5L J -f +'iv-~-(_~NJ}(JAi.J.Qb
and attenaance sheets produced as a result of this Development ln}orination Meeting will
be provided to the City of Maple Ridge and form part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon
request.
CONTACT INFORMATION (Optional)
. --
Name:. 1J
·"'.
Te
~ ............ ---.. t ....... --_-_Email: ·. l' .·
Q2J
:I I I
ENT CARD· KA+D
TAYlOR KURT.ZARCHJTgCTURE+ DESIGN INC
RE:. Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street
COMMENTS:
'::?1~.c ,, r-k
.,'r"'-'t:1
( (l_.'l, f. '\( (_" {' £\£:~ ,,
• C, •• ,.L.t ... ) ' . ·\ -·~~'~ t, ,., 0
(1 . ' \ "
'· ,L .. J .. SlJvJi· · l; (j. (~ .,, . \,.J;(\ ·,St f'J · LL) ,A-:l _i
() ""· ( -~.
-.. ~., 0,,, ... )..:\ f ~·· . "-"-;-,\9, S f\Cdr \ ,">, ,:\..i , , g~ Cl[)C\.._d1 <::,)
( ~. • . ...,5 1 {~ . . I'" .... ,._5 ..
-~. . ·.. •· ... .;.~ . : :.~ --' . . . . '.-;,.'(:~~... .. . :....._ -. .·-~ : . . . .. ·. ·~··i ...... .• .... "' •, ·. ""'i (""\ \) \ l::) KJ \ . \ er'" \ ,)C., (_,,:x .\; ); ( ) ,::, () \ J~.C \ (\ --><~ ( 1 ~ f\, LJ \ · . . ... . . "". ..3,·
--~~~~~ ........ ......,~~ ......... ,...... .............. .,..,..~......,;, .................... ~~--~--~~~~~~-,-,,--~~~~~~~~~~....,.,.,......,"'-· ... -.--------------~----~~~--......... ~~~~~~--~~~~~~--~~~~---~~
)
Please note that a/J comment and attendance sh~ets produced qs a resµlt of this Ot;velopment Information Mee.ting will )
be provided to the City a/Maple Ridge and form part of the public record that is aval/able for viewing by the public upon
request
CONTACT 1NFORMATION (Optional)
Name: Te~. •-.. --~ ..... ~ Jmail:_.:·
~
I I I, 1~KA+D
COMMENT CARD TAYLOR KURTZ ARCHITECTURE+ DESIGN iNC
RE: Proposed o~:ve .. ,l~pr~ep~ at 11310 Kin~ston Street
' -\ \ l, .
COMMENTS: ~ \ J r * .(Sr " .. , ... , . \, .. }fl, ~
') <;> · 1 I .J It 4\t..,;>' (. ~
C) J.
,f~-~ .... ~.f"<°
\..; .... ri.
Please note that all comment and attendance sheets produced a_s d result of this Development Information Meeting will
be provided to the City of Maple Ridge and form part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon
request
01 t\
CONTAflf\lNFORMA[ION (4pUon~{)
Name: Tel:1\ -,--.-~
· -·rnail:_ --
',.J
~
I I I
COM!M:ENT
TKA+D
TAYLOR KURTZARCHITEQTURE+ DESIGN INC .
RE: Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street
(-; ' l,t ~ ' . /)
COMMENTS: Jt1) ·j--·· -·~ "-f? ()Y:2.<Lt{?.:JC:Yi( ,\ V\ ~lt\_e .... (A;_~·=t~"
0 \· c) C~~ \ . ~ ... ,,, ~ (...-1 -,,;,.l · ",~ cit -· ··
/ :f'1 ~-~ '
·\/le)~·-·
(,,.i i\,,.-:a V\·· \c-· ,~ ... ~-{_,.....,,\_ ' -j \ H-c~\f'f\'f'<'\:CJ/\_(+ .... c~x~~(\eCl ··-··-~t_y·,~a\_(~ __ 2':: ~\~)
}, ""' .. .,....." .... ·. '.' -· ·, t -·-,-. \ ,.. . \ . ., ...... \ \ \. ' . l\ \ ;. .· .5. . .., , ~~~.Jt'1'\G~\ \ S ·(:.~.:;:S tCA(~>{ \".·""tck y"1(~'1··\ c~ ·r\ "')r1;·-~··l/J (~ 'JC'<YX <":;, ( 4 )>_". i 1'":><~~\,t_ .. "\_-·jc;~"'
\:~,
.f -. \
'.· \ ('\ ('· .,. \
, \ · .. ..-J.~\_c)C'c··,f~ \ ~·--\··--~. -._....----.--.---~~
.;~'.'
) ... ~/ ... ' .1
_, __ :,.,,..•· ..... ~• ... ~~-;;.c::._~'""."'-~
Please note that all comment and attendance she•ets produced as a rr;s.vlt of this Dev€!./9prn~nhn.fo.rmation Meeting will
be provided to the City of Maple Ridge and form part of the public record that i$ available for viewing by thfJ. public llpon
request.
CONTACT INFORMATION (Optional)
Name: Tel: Email: ------------
E]
I I, ii
co:M,MENT CARD
RE: Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street
COMMENTS:
.• ,-··.;;"·-···"'·""' ,, .••. ,-.. ,<''t /'1 (''' . ,' . ·' ., I fl lE t<., I-·~'' I ) // 0 (/ {'.,e/)
;-:::::: I '""""· ·"i%
~/,~?/!? /'?Jo Al ,D , , //a,/-t,~ t::' /v;r) ;,
.1~... • . e --r'':<'?:-; i:.r L / ~-,c./ -;;-·· f ,,~ ~:;,:",1, i ,.;;;r.;) / ~r..../,..,..,«:I''>~ ~u-.-~ I t' ··L ,..-i: :;w ....
~):,:.;J ,,-., -'.'.'Y1 :-'I /""'. ,.., _. / / /\, '.· ",,,,.--. ,:J, " , , · .. · ("\ ..,__.r""· ~A ... eJ t c. ... J g!?;,,. /) //J, // U}:,, 7 A.:,,/c'J [ l // _
4_.r.to lti!J#'
""!A'/ y' J!,//V?,w,f·~
/4/C<J~r
~rKA+D
TAYLOR KURTZ.ARCHffECTURE+ DESIGN INC
lj ri?•"\..
/L/""J /J "" /;) <f.'Ltj
..
Please note that all comment and at.tendance sheets produced as a result of this Development Information Meeting will
be provided to the City of Maple Ridge and form part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon
request.
CONTACT l~FORMATION (Optional)
Name: Tel: Email:_
----r
~
sf I I -TKA+D
COM:MENT CARO TAYLOR KURTZARCHITECTURE+ DESIGN INC
RE: Proposed Development at 11310 Kingston Street
COMMENTS: As JFl.1/Cid .k 1/JJ) lS.\ft>(_./ f?{~ t 5 JL1Jl5'\lx:sif":3 )
i .. . ~zr-··-·/o Q
& }\.) .J-t1·y(~}-t.:i> {. (::5· 61~/l,·0 J~ c:·;;·-----y---f~f: 7=-~t:-~~/ (__.. fLlLSZrv) 5 <-:·y-:-cJt))
___ ... ~ ,·-'"'.;::-7~····1\ J}t /)·'·'[{l·7R·1;'"L~~s cs··J.:? c}) ;.::... p~-l'.~l O 't f)(T}~ c.; ·"Y+--l't.Y \~ dt.~·J J). <~. (S~"~:-
.-::?' · r···)i r·) · · · · · ·· ·-"":) ·· J.1.:1 .. ·".·.1. /.11.,.·./···'·1·'°.~ ......... · / ........ •.·•.· .. · .. ,,, ......... ·~ c.··'""1 ., .... , ,,;_ \../;:' v J'. ·. . · •---~: -•~-' _,,.,,L-~ . / ;>
Please note that oJl.comment _and attendance she~ts produced as a result of this Development Information Meeting will· )
be provided to the City of Maple Ridge and form part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon
request
CONTACT INF0)3{\jiATION {Qptional)
Name: __ -Tel:
1
_EmaU: ________ _
E]
I I I
COM:MEiNT
TAYLOR KURTZ ARCHITECTURE+ DESIGN lNC
RE:· Proposed DE~velopment at 11310 Kingston Street
. . · · · . . • . · r·, ·" I '.' . ) . / . · . . l // "') ~''" 1· COMMENTS.._,._) /!;~ (/,· {,.,, / .J,,j/V 1 /. ·;v j / '::< ''-·'"'"'~l,.i :..; ··A., '1--~r {~· ci;;.;1 r:l .. :/ f) v t: ..... .::i ( ,/" L#•' 1 v t 1. ;•· [/ l.
//\/ /b12c1-J /l51 . .11/f1 A·AIY l1Ji9 72~r;JFX:1J1t./rff
j ::~?D10f:;ff~ ·~rt/·· f ,,_ > , wC _ • )
Please note that all comment and attendance sheets produced as a result of this Development Information JV/eeting will
be provided to the City of Maple-Ridge and form part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon
request.
CONTACT INFORMATION {Optional)
Name::..
/ ........ --~----Tel:..i:.~-------~ Email:
E]
I I I
COM:MENT CARD TKA+D
RE: Proposed Development at 113.10 Kingston Street
TAYLOf< KURTZ ARCHITECTURE+ DESIGN INC
. i / ·.,··. . ..--'·.,. ,;,,' (';>,, /"/ . . ~-. \ . n LA .) f\ L 0 .-".' ·'"" '\ \' · ·, \ ·. , /. u ·-( ) .::,.. r, ,,, CO MM ENTS: ~ \-'\ ,;,_\\. Y \~fa ·-""':t \';::_. ...)..) \\) \ )\ \ \ ~~·;\ & h~--. -h \. \r..:... . , .. \J \-; ~0
\."~\~,(~ '"'.· v\ t'>\~\ 0() r~-~~~J 1 ,\)_ -·~~\ --~ \\Ji~)\.,.
\ ·o o. -~ \){,1' G---(~; ··'1 \\ f~: < , ti t j<-\
'\}f'~,;~ ~>) \.._;\~:, (:) \ (~ \ ;~ \.r·~ « 0 rv \\ . b \~ \) (t :\ ~·Vt«~· N. -r\ \~ -~ ~_;.·t \ 5 ,:~.~. \( \\) s (:>{:.\ \l< \(_
( (l ·. ,/ / I:. ,, • ( L' / . ;1 . · · ) <
\~ .. '"'()\.#~'-\(.. 2) ') ... \\~'~) \) \ \w1'''~J-~'' c. ~;\ \-\t2>--J ~(Jf~~ .\ ~-~~
'\ c· ·. ) .,,,(··-·. ·/ \.r,\\/\ ~ \ ·. ~ (L~ ~\ ~ \:;r ~\ · \ {{ \:~(-·'< l (_) .
-. . . . ~
Please note that all comment and attendance sheets produced as a result of this Development Information Meeting wi/J
be provided to the City of ,Maple Ridge and form part of the public record that is available for viewing by the public upon
request.
CONTACT INFORMATION (Optional}
Name::: ___ Tel: Email:_.
SKETCH PLAN SHOWING WATERCOURSES AND MAPLE RIDGE SETBACK$ OF LOT 2 DISTRICT LOT 280 AND 281 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN BCP50883 PRflWl£D FOR: PITT ll£AOOIIS PlW8HG Cl'l7C NIOR!5S: 11055 IWEil!OOO SIRffT, IIAPIE R1llCE IWIW. IDfNllFJER: 028-BSS-515 BCGS 92 G.028 T/J1S pion ks .,w, llw!jurisdcl1on of Iha lheCilyollloploir.ctge Scale I: 1250 'f.JJ 'Ll° j L£Cil/l) LOT I PW/ BCP5088J lO'Of&WK HIGH ll'IIER IWIK ---(22 IIAPIE R1llCE smMCl<S LOr OtllEI/S1(JI/S DCRMJJ FROlol PUH IJCP5Q88J 'ALL OTHER tor IJI/EllDRK FVR SC£NOrr PIIRPOS£S WADf' .t ASSOCl415 W/0 5UR'r£llHG LID. BC W/0 5l»MlOOS IIISSKJll.tlW!.ER11lCE PflDNf, (604) 826-!1561 OR 46J-47SJ FJL£: IIJOS4-IU-02-RI \ LOT 2 PW/ BCP5088J D.L. 280 & 281, GP. 1 APPENDIX H .wlWlr( 29-JI, 2018 fUIRUJJ1Y ,. 2018 DR.lltWGllll!) FfllR1JAKr 1-2,5 .t 16 2018
Michelle Baski, City of Maple Ridge October 16, 2020 Page 3 of 5 To improve safety and encourage active transportation, consideration could be given to adding signalized crosswalks to the intersection of Kingston Street and 113b Avenue, and a sidewalk to the west side of Kingston Street. Active transportation improvements would be particularly important in this area to help alleviate the known congestion issues on 113b Avenue at peak commuting times, primarily vehicles exiting Golden Ears Bridge. While there are no bus stops within the site limits, shelters could be provided for nearby bus stops on Ditton Street, Princess Street, Lorne Avenue, Hammond Road, Maple Crescent, and 203 Street, to make transit a more comfortable and attractive travel option for people accessing the proposed development. The bus stops could also be made accessible. The developer could provide continuous walking facilities around and within the site, ideally on both sides of each street, where appropriate. Secure bike parking could be provided as appropriate for the various buildings, as well as benches, bike racks, and drinking fountains throughout the site. Lighting could be provided along the active transportation routes. Active transportation improvements provided by the developer could be complemented by other cycling and pedestrian improvements that Translink could cost share with the City of Maple Ridge, in order to provide complete and continuous cycling and walking connections. Please feel free to contact us to learn more about Translink's municipal funding programs. Transportation Demand Management Translink has a regional Transportation Demand Management (TDM) mandate and role in assisting municipalities and developers to build TDM plans into developments. These plans are essentially suggested agreements that can be made between the municipality and the developer that effectively trade dedicated parking stalls for amenities and services that stimulate less trips, more transit use, more shared vehicle use and more active transportation. Guidance based on 'Translink TravelSmart Development TDM Plans' (Attachment 1) recommend primary measures that prioritize sustainable transportation as part of rezoning and/or development permit applications. At a high level, these include: • Amenities: One-off infrastructure investments in amenities such as bicycle parking and changing facilities, priority parking spaces for pooled and shared vehicles, EV charging points, wayfinding, pedestrian links and transit information; • Services: Car share vehicle contracts, vehicle pools, carpooling programs, campus shuttle modelled on demand, bike lockers and stalls; and • Administration/Marketing: the above services can/should be monitored (usually annually) either by the municipality or by the developer to assess the value or effectiveness of each travel option. Given the above-discussed limitations on existing sustainable transportation options in this area, as well as the expected increase in trip generation from this development, we encourage the City
1104TO: FROM: City of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: May 17, 2022 2018-489-RZ cow SUBJECT: Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7523-2018 20278 and 20292 Patterson Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject properties, located at 20278 and 20292 Patterson Avenue from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential), to permit a future four-storey apartment building, with approximately 88 units. Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7523-2018 on January 28, 2020. This application is in compliance with the Medium Density Mu/ti-Family land use designation within the North Hammond Precinct of the Hammond Area Plan in the Official Community Plan. Pursuant to Council Policy 6.31, this application will be subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program at the rate adopted by the time this application receives third reading. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7523-2018 as amended, be given second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing; 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii) Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; iii) Road dedication on Patterson Avenue and 203 Street, as required; iv) Consolidation of the subject properties; v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject properties for the proposed development; vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Acoustic Study prepared for the subject properties; vii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management; viii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Visitor Parking; 2018-489-RZ Page 1 of 9
ix) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the sanitary and storm pump; x) Removal of existing buildings; xi) The septic systems serving the existing dwellings must be decommissioned and removed, in accordance with Ministry of Health requirements, immediately upon connecting to the municipal Sanitary Sewer; xii) If the Director of Waste Management from the Ministry of Environment determines that a site investigation is required based on the submitted Site Disclosure Statement, a rezoning, development, or development variance permit cannot be approved until a release is obtained for the subject properties; xiii) In addition to the Ministry of Environment Site Disclosure Statement, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject properties. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site; and xiv) That a voluntary contribution be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions, at the rate adopted by Council at the time this application receives third reading. DISCUSSION: 1. Background Context: Applicant: Legal Descriptions: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: 2018-489-RZ W. Bissky, Bissky Architecture and Urban Design Inc. Lot 55 Except Part Dedicated Road on Plan 78633, District Lot 222, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 35806; and Lot 56, District Lot 222, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 35806 Medium Density Multi-Family Medium Density Multi-Family RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Single Family Residential RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Low Density Multi-Family and Medium Density Multi-Family Single Family Residential RS-1 (Single Detached Residential), RS-1b (Single Detached (Medium Density) Residential) Medium Density Multi-Family, Single-Family and Compact Residential Page 2 of 9
East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Properties: Proposed Use of Properties: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Companion Applications: Single Family Residential RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Medium Density Multi-Family Single Family Residential RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Low Density Multi-Family Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential 0.37 ha (0.91 acres) Patterson Avenue Urban Standard 2018-489-DP /DVP 2. Project History and Description: The two subject properties, located at 20278 and 20292 Patterson Avenue, at the intersection of Patterson Avenue and 203 Street, together make up a development site approximately 0.37 ha (0.91 acres) in size (see Appendices A and B). The subject properties are mainly flat, with an existing single family dwelling on each of them. The subject properties are surrounded by single family dwellings on all sides. A Katzie First Nation's cemetery is located to the southeast of the subject properties, across 203 Street. Maple Ridge Fire Hall No. 3 is located two properties to the south of the subject properties, and the City has recently acquired the property located to the south, at 11789 203 Street, to allow for expansion of the Fire Hall. Patterson Avenue is a local road which ends in a cul-de-sac to the west. 203 Street is a main north/south arterial road in the western end of the City, connecting lower Hammond, the Maple Meadows Business Park, the commercial services along Lougheed Highway and Dewdney Trunk Road, and the residential and agricultural areas to the north. This application first came to Council on January 29, 2019, to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit an apartment building. Council deferred the application, pending the outcomes of the Lougheed Transit Corridor Study. The Lougheed Transit Corridor Study was discussed at Council Workshop on December 3, 2019. Council referred the Lougheed Transit Corridor Study Area back to staff for further work to incorporate higher densities. This subject application was further discussed at Council Workshop on December 10, 2019. At this meeting, it was determined that the land use designation of Medium Density Multi-Family in the Hammond Area Plan would remain on the properties, and that the applicant could work with staff to amend the design of the building to be more sensitive to the surrounding single family residences. The original development proposal was for a four-storey apartment building with approximately 6,597 m2 (71,008 ft2) of gross floor area, and a floor space ratio of approximately 1.8, with 82 units. Council direction provided at the December 10, 2019 Workshop meeting, was that the project will need to be revised to be more sensitive to the surrounding built form and height of the single family residential properties to the west and south. The application has been revised to reduce the unit size, and overall building, providing a gross floor area of 5,860 m2 (63,080 ft2), a decrease in size of 737 m2 (7,933 ft2) and a floor space ratio of approximately 1.75, but with an increase to 88 units. The unit mix consists of 20 one-bedroom units and 68 two-bedroom units. The building meets the setbacks required adjacent to the single-family homes to the west and south, but is requiring setback variances fronting the streets, as discussed below. 2018-489-RZ Page 3 of 9
3. Planning Analysis: i) Official Community Plan: The subject properties are located in the North Hammond Precinct of the Hammond Area Plan in the Official Community Plan (OCP). The properties are designated Medium Density Residential to reflect their location on a Major Corridor and their proximity to Lougheed Highway. This Medium Density Residential land use designation aligns with a townhouse and rowhouse form of development to a maximum of three storeys, as well as an apartment form of housing to a maximum of four storeys. The Hammond Area Plan currently has the following policy under the Medium Density Residential designation to create a sensitive transition as existing neighbourhoods experience redevelopment: 3-26 Ensuring that higher densities are compatible with existing character is an important consideration. Design for new development should include: a) Orienting living and activity spaces toward streets and Janeways, so that opportunities for "eyes on the street" are created wherever possible; b) Careful consideration of size, location, and orientation of on-site open space areas to ensure new development allows ample sunlight and a variety of plant materials and trees that are complementary to the existing mature landscaping that contributes to the neighbourhood character; c) Design that is sensitive to surrounding built form and height, particularly for buildings that are three (3) or more storeys in height; d) Parking for residents is provided in a concealed or underground structure. In addition to the above-noted compatibility policy, the Hammond Area Plan includes Development Permit (DP) guidelines to shape the design of new buildings so that they integrate with the character of each Hammond neighbourhood. The following DP building massing guidelines are particularly relevant in the context of the proposed development: 2.2.4 Apartment buildings over two storeys should articulate or step back upper storeys of buildings (the third storey and above) to reduce the scale and massing of the building. 2.2.5 New development should provide a transition in scale to adjacent land uses with a different land use designation. This can be achieved through: • Building design articulation of building features; • Setback or buffer to adjacent development; and • A combination of the above with landscaping and trees. The applicant was encouraged to step back the building on the south-western corner; however, the applicant wanted to proceed with the attached plans, preferring to weigh the advantages of housing affordability over the DP guidelines. The proposal does address most of these policies by breaking up the building with an internal courtyard fronting Patterson Avenue. Units front onto the streets and courtyard, providing "eyes on the street". Although setback variances are being sought for the street frontages, the required setbacks to the west and south are being met and significant landscaping is being provided. 2018-489-RZ Page 4 of 9
iv) Proposed Variances: A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves the following relaxations (see Appendix D): a) Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019: • Part 4 -Residential Zones, Section 618 RM-2 Medium Density Apartment Residential o 618.7 1. a. and d. To reduce the minimum front (203 Street) and exterior (Patterson Avenue) side setbacks from 7.5 m (24.6 ft.) down to 4 m (13.1 ft.) to the building face and to 2.75 m (9.0 ft.) to the roof overhang. The requested variances to reduce the front and exterior yard setbacks will be the subject of a future report to Council. v) Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.13 of the OCP, a Hammond Development Permit Area application is required for all Medium Density Multi-Family developments located in the Hammond Area Plan. Through this design process, efforts will be made to reduce the scale and massing of the proposed building to be more sensitive to the single-family houses in the area. The Development Permit will be the subject of a future report to Council; however Building Elevations and the Landscape Plan have been attached to this report (see Appendix E). vi) Advisory Design Panel: The application was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel (ADP) at a meeting held on January 19, 2022, and their comments and the applicant's responses are attached to this report (see Appendix F). A detailed description of the project's form and character will be included in a future report to Council. vii) Development Information Meeting: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was not possible for the developer to host an in-person Development Information Meeting. In lieu of Development Information Meetings, an interim process has been established to allow for a ten day Public Comment Opportunity. The notification requirements are the same as for the Development Information Meeting and include a mail-out, newspaper advertisements, and notice on the development signs that provides the contact information for the developer and the Public Comment period. The Public Comment Opportunity was held between March 14 and March 30, 2022. Originally the date range was proposed for March 14 to March 24, 2022; however, since this date range was over the School District's Spring Break, the date range was extended to March 30, 2022, to allow residents time to respond once they had potentially returned from vacation. A summary of the main comments and discussions with the attendees was provided by the applicant (see Appendix G). The main concerns were around traffic impacting the residents of Patterson Avenue, and neighbourhood fit. The public will have an additional opportunity to share their concerns with the Mayor and Council at the Public Hearing, should Council forward this report. 2018-489-RZ Page 6 of 9
iii) Hammond Elementary has an operating capacity of 444 students. For the 2020-21 school year, the student enrolment at Hammond Elementary is 411 students (93% utilization) including 169 students from out of catchment. Westview Secondary School has an operating capacity of 1200 students. For the 2020-21 school year, the student enrolment at Westview Secondary School is 651 students (54% utilization) including 412 students from out of catchment." Provincial Archaeology Branch There are no known archaeological sites identified in the vicinity on the Province's Archaeological Data site; however, the, City has designated the Katzie Cemetery as a Heritage site in the Heritage Inventory. Should there be a confirmed chance find discovery, all work in the immediate area would need to be halted until an appropriate Heritage Conservation Act (HCA) Permit is obtained. All applications for HCA Permits are forwarded by the Archaeology Branch to appropriate First Nations for review. 6. Citizen/Customer Implications: As discussed above, with the addition of this sub-area into the Lougheed Transit Corridor study, focused consultation events were held with area residents. A summary of the consultation information was provided to Council at the Council Workshop meeting of December 10, 2019. Additionally, a Public Comment Opportunity was held to provide feedback to the Developer, and residents will be able to voice their opinions on the development at the Public Hearing, should Council forward this report on to a Public Hearing. It should be noted that there have been lengthy discussions around Building Scheme restrictive covenants that were originally on the Certificates of Title for the subject properties, which were later discharged by the Land Titles Office. This restrictive covenant was between private property owners, and not the City. There is still a notation on the Certificates of Title referring to the Building Scheme. The surrounding neighbourhood has concerns with the proposed development which would not adhere to the Building Scheme. The developer should be aware that Council may rezone the subject properties and authorize the City to issue the Development Permit and Building Permit to allow the proposed development, despite the Building Scheme being on Title. However, the Building Scheme is a private agreement, so it is possible that any other owner may explore the option to delay or prevent the development. 2018-489-RZ Page 8 of 9
CONCLUSION: It is recommended that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7523-2018 as amended, and that application 2018-489-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. "Original signed by Michelle Baski" Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT, MA Planner "Original signed by Mark McMullen" for Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Charles Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7523-2018 Appendix D -Proposed Site Plan Appendix E -Proposed Building Elevations and Landscape Plan Appendix F -Advisory Design Panel Resolution and Applicant Response Appendix G -Development Information Meeting Summary 2018-489-RZ Page 9 of 9
W NE STEP EN BISSKY ARCHITECTURE URBAN DESIGN PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN 106 -11893 227TH STREET. i'v\APLE RIDGE, BC PH 604-467-8300 FAX (i04-467-8305 5. 6. 7. Ensure number of bike racks meets minimum requirements and consider e-bike parking; Consider third elevator and review code requirements for length of corridor and accessibility and convenience; Consider compromised layout of units A and C, including and Landscape Comments: area. Please note that the City currently only requires bike storage in the town centre. is specified areas outside the town centre. While there is reference to bike storage in the Hammond Guidelines, no specifics are provided regarding numbers. However, we are providing for 28 long term bikes on the main floor adjacent to the cou1tyard and short term stalls near the main entry with an e-bike provision at the co1Jrtv·ard entry. ---f;;r-th-is ,i;s~-rvati;;n~ w~hav~ discus;~~Tihis-with-th~ ~-li~nts ~nd ih-ey-would to maintain the current layout. We did explore many plan options during the design process with them and understanding that "design is compromise" this one provided the best balance between accessibility, and efficiency, in as it impacted the parking. It does comply fully with BCBC and the Devices Safety _RegulationforBC __ Please see our response to comment 6. 1. Address limited diversity of tree species, in paiticular on slab; selection has been modified, to increase variety of species and distribution on slab. 2. Provide adequate soil volume for trees (10 m3 of soil per tree); Explore opportunities for increasing programming, e.g. children's play space or other; Sincerely, space been revised to provide more amenity, with additional areas and picnic/activity tables to encourage social opportunities. play space has been provided with the addition of a synthetic lawn for informal play, to confirm use as a play space, and can be used for various social events and activities. Metal screens added to ramp and street sides of refuse pad Plant material added. Page 2 of 2
WAYNE STEP EN BISS KY ARCHITECTURE URBAN DESIGN PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN HEAD OFFICE: 106 -119.6B 227th STREET, MAPLE RIDGE BC PH 604-467-3300 FAX 604-467-8305 March 31, 2022 Michelle Baski Maple Ridge Planning Department 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BCV2X 6A9 Ph: 604-463-5221 Civic Address: 20278 and 20292 Patterson Avenue, Maple Ridge File No.: 2018-489-RZ Public Comments Opportunity Period: March 14 to March 30, 2022 Number of Responses: We received ten responses. APPENDIXG Comments Sheets and Correspondence: I have attached copies of the emails received from respondents, along with our replies. Summary of how issues and concerns identified will be addressed: The issues identified respondents are noted in the table below, along with how we have addressing them. ayne Bissky Wayne Stephen Bissky Architecture Urban Design Inc 1 06 -11 893 22 7th Street Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6H9 Ph: 604-467-8300 Email: wayne@bisskyarchitecture.ca Summary, Analysis, and Response to Public Comments Opportunity Comments Item l Analysis and Response Bike Lanes Along 203rd Street p:Engineering Department has the authority to decide the road standard that will be applied to any One respondent suggested that the bike lane elopment application. Our design team simply has to design whatever they require. on 203rd north of DewdneyTrunk Road be extended further south. Building and Parking Access The front of the building, including the front door and access to the underground will be on Patterson Avenue. Some respondents asked about the location of Planning and engineering departments typically don't want to see access to underground parkades located on the parking ramp and front entry to the major streets, like 203rd Street, to avoid backing up traffic as people drive in and out. building. Bus Service This location enjoys far greater transit service than most every other neighbourhood in town. Our hope is that One respondent expressed concern that there the added density that this building will bring to the community will increase ridership. was low ridership on the various bus routes that serve the properties Consultation with First Nations In accordance with the City's policy, all property owners within 1 OOm of the site were notified and invited to Two respondents asked if local First Nations comment, two ads were placed in the local newspaper and ran on March 4th and 11th, and notification was had been notified placed on the two development application signs on site. In addition, I understand the Hammond Area Plan was developed in consultation with the Katzie First Nation. Covenants on the Properties There are no covenants currently registered on title for either property restricting the style of construction. Some respondents wondered if there was a Copies of the certificates of title have been provided to City staff as part of the application. covenant registered on title that would restrict the type of building on the property. Page 1 of 3
From: _ Subject: Development App No: 2018-489-RZ Date: March 28, 2022 at 7:55 PM To: jared@tektonpm.com From: Maple Ridge, BC Sirs: Thank you for soliciting our feedback on the proposed development at Patterson and 203rd Street. This is the first time we have had the opportunity to comment on the project. This community has had a difficult time getting its voice heard from the time of the change to the Hammond Area Plan to the specifics of this proposal.By way of background, most feel that the notification of the Area Plan was inadequate and the definition of what constitutes "Hammond" was not consistent with our understanding of the community. The lack of feedback from this area to the Hammond Area Plan should have triggered some concerns at the City. To say that Hammond is in favour of the plan ignores the lack of input that was made to it. We are writing with our concerns over the proposed redevelopment of 20278/20292 Patterson Avenue and the rezoning request. We are opposed to such a development. Specifically, we do not feel the construction of an 88 unit apartment building in our neighbourhood is consistent with the character and atmosphere for which we came to Maple Ridge 35 years ago. We understand things will change over time and indeed have witnessed changes to our area that we accepted as inevitable. The construction of a 4 story apartment building is not one of these. In addition, this development would appear to contravene the Guiding Principals of the zoning mission statement. There is no transition or fit between this proposal and the character of the rest of the neighbourhoods on Patterson, Ashley or Stanton. This appears to be a hodge-podge of planning. The concept of "densification" should not result in the imposition of a project that is not supported by the infrastructure in the area. There are increasing traffic concerns, absence of parks, and privacy concerns and general safety concerns that are not addressed. This project is less a solution to densification and more of a self-serving cash grab by developers anxious to fit as many apartments on the properties as they can regardless of the imposition on the neighbourhood. The 88 units in this proposal exceeds the number of homes on Patterson and Ashley combined. The addition of 100 -120 vehicles to an already congested 203rd Street will make a bad situation worse. It is currently difficult to turn onto 203rd from a side street due to traffic from Golden Ears bridge and the industrial park. The volume of traffic in place has made the intersection at Lougheed and 203rd the 2nd highest in Maple Ridge for accidents according to ICBC (Dec 2017) and the 4th worst intersection for accidents between the Pitt River bridge and Hatzic. 203rd is a two lane road with street parking available. This street parking is fully availed all day by employees of the Ford dealership. It is also a bike route. The relocation of the Royal Bank to the corner further complicates the traffic pattern at an intersection that was never designed to handle this type of volume. We have children in our neighbourhood who now have to negotiate with the significant traffic to cross to go to their elementary school. The traffic information in your presentation seems to be based on patterns pre-Golden Ears Bridge (or pre-toll free bridge) or on reduced traffic as a result of the pandemic.
Patterson is a dead-end road with one street light (at the far end). With this proposal, the entrance to Patterson will become more congested and restrict the ability of emergency vehicles to enter the street or resident to leave in an emergency. It is interesting that your proposal provides a view from the north and west sides. Omitted is the view from the south and east sides, the sides that infringe on the privacy of the existing neighbours, The violation of the privacy we expect in our yards and homes is one of the most concerning items we have with this development. In addition to the overview of adjoining yards, the inevitable noise from TV's, washing/machines, even conversations are unreasonable. While it may seem that a 4-story building is a low rise, in a neighbourhood with two story homes, it stands out like a sore thumb. It is proposed to rise two stories above the existing homes and tree lines and seems to require a change to the existing set-back on the houses now in place to meet the 88 units they propose. We also oppose the change to the set-back requirements. If such a change is necessary to make this project, it reinforces why this development is not a fit to the existing community. Sincerely,
From: Michelle Baski mbaski@mapleridge.ca Subject: FW: proposed RESIDENTIAL BUILDING @ 20292 / 20278 Patterson Avenue Date: March 31, 2022 at 8:36 AM To: Jared Bissky jared@tektonpm.com Fyi, for your summary package. Thanks, Michelle From: Planning Enquiries Mailbox <planning@mapleridge.ca> Sent: March 31, 2022 8:30 AM To: Michelle Baski <mbaski@mapleridge.ca> Subject: FW: proposed RESIDENTIAL BUILDING @ 20292 / 20278 Patterson Avenue From: Sent: March 30, 2022 3:57 PM To: Planning Enquiries Mailbox <glanning.@magleridge.ca>;. Subject: proposed RESIDENTIAL HUILDING @ 20292 / 20278 Patterson Avenue Don't click on links or open attachments you don't trust. !\le cliquez pas sur les liens et n'ouvrez pas Jes pieces jointes susp2cts. File Number 2018-489-RZ Planning@mc112leridge.ca Home Owner: MY PUBLIC OPINION FOR THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPEMENT ON 203RD AND PATTERSON Has this been going on since 2018, Why so long? The owners in this area did not have an open dialogue with the city with redevelopment plans for this area. Nobody really new what the consequences could be for this area. Adding a residential structure on 203rd and Patterson will add much more congestion on a street that is a major road to Langley. The Street has only 2 lanes and parking is allowed on both sides of the street for local businesses There are times when leaving for work at 7:30 in the morning that traffic is lined up to Patterson going toward Langley. Patterson is a dead end street. The fire hall needs easy access for emergency's. The City wants to add 88 residences right beside the fire hall. Lougheed and 203rd is a major accident corner. I have to take special awareness when crossing at that intersection. Its unfortunate that Maple Ridge has one major highway, all other street either run into Lougheed or cross. Buses were finally added to Lougheed Hwy to increase for higher densities in select areas. So far would think the Lougheed line is losing money Hardly any passengers? Its a great bus service if you live near one of the stops. If you live somewhere between these stops, the service doesn't make sense. I guess its a work in process? The buses should go at least to Bruce's and maybe Mission? That would mean more buses and drivers to serve Maple Ridge. Coquitlam to Haney Mall. The drivers must like this run. Very few stops. The service is great if you are shopping at Coquitlam Mall, Haney Mall is a different situation. What happens when the other side of Patterson goes up fore sale? That would add another 88 residences to the street? Have any of the planners done a walking tour of this area? I sure wouldn't want to check out this area at rush hour. One lone apartment (Residential doesn't say exactly who will reside in the units) next to a fire hall with plans to redevelop their site? Maybe you can add apartments above the new fire hall when it get
------redeveloped? Idea only, for future firemen and firewomen and their families who need affordable housing. Why do I get the idea that this email is a waste of time. Anyways? Congestion, Privacy, 203rd is an emergency highway, Parking, redevelop area around Shell Station. This looks like the start of a major change from private homes to Apartments and Condos. Makes sense to me, Shopping, rail service, Must be at least 4 bus lines close by? Langley, Haney Mall, Downtown, Braid Station, Coquitlam Station, I wonder if the bus will stop at the new dealerships under construction. More congestion? Anyways the owners in this area are teaming up together to push for a change on council for this fall. apologize for any errors I made. This is strictly my thoughts and I don1 t want to offend city hall. I hope that Maple Ridge Council will make these opinions open for the public to review? Prepared by
been chosen to reflect Hammond's heritage influence. They've tried to sensitively design the building to respect the existing neighbourhood scale, massing, and character, and added a generous landscaped buffer around the building including large trees along the south and west sides. They've pulled the building closer to 203rd Street and Patterson Avenue and away from the existing houses on the south and west sides in accordance with gui_dance the advisory design panel. Pulling the building closer to Patterson Ave is definitely not supported. As mentioned, all of the homes have generous front lawns and houses are set well back from the road. A four-storey high building is too high for this residential street, especially situated at the entrance/exit of Patterson Ave. Materials, colours and detailing are not the concern here (and what do you mean by designing ·a "quieter" building?).;. it's about the SIZE of this proposed building of apartments not being sensitive to the existing neighbourhood scale of single-family houses. 4. Sidewalk, Street Lights, and Street Trees -The street trees, street lights, sidewalks, and boulevards are all standard road requirements from the Engineering Department. We could ask if they would consider allowing the project to install provisions for a future streetlight that could be installed if future development occurs on the street. Residents do not wish to have any streetlights installed on Patterson Ave. LED streetlights would shine too brightly into the front bedroom/living room windows of the houses directly across on Patterson and this is not something Patterson Ave residents have ever requested to have installed. When Patterson Ave was built, none of these road r~quirements were in place, therefore adding a few trees, lights, sidewalks etc. in front of the first 2 houses on the south side of Patterson would look completely out of place and disrupt the flow of the street. 5. Courtyard and Patios -The zoning bylaw requires that these types of buildings include both shared and private outdoor spaces for the benefit of the residents. Just a point to note, that in the entire area surrounding the Northwest precinct of "Hammond", there are NO outdoor public park spaces, no playgrounds for children etc. The nearest outdoor play area is at the ele·mentary school, however this is not really a park. With an 88-unit apartment complex, these new residents on Patterson wouldn't be well served with no walking distance parks, again necessitating more vehicle traffic. 6. Parkade Access -The folks at the Engineering Department don't like to have properties accessed off major corridors, like 203rd Street, and they like to see the accesses located away from intersections to ease traffic transitions, hence the access to the parkade is located on Patterson Avenue, at the west side of the property. Having a parkade access on Patterson Ave rather than 203 would mean that vehicles exiting the building parkade would always have their headlights shining directly into house windows immediately in front on the north side of Patterson. Ave. This would be particularly disruptive during the darker morning & evening hours during the fall/winter months each year. Patterson Ave residents have garages and vehicles "back out" of their driveways onto the street. Another potential problem with vehicle accidents with parkade exit on Patterson. 7. Setbacks -We are requesting a reduction to the setbacks on the north and east sides to 4m to pull the building closer to Patterson Avenue and 2~rd Street. You may noticed in the materials package that the City is taking a 2.Sm dedication along Patterson Avenue and a 3m dedication along 203rd Street'to widen the City's road right-of-way and install a wider boulevard and sidewalk. In other words, the property is shrinking by 2.Sm along Patterson Avenue and 3m along 203rd Street. So with the 4m setbacks on those two sides, the building will be 6.Sm from the current property line on Patterson (4m setback+ 2.Sm dedication) and 7m from the current property line on 203rd (4m setb.ack + 3m dedication). Requesting a 11reduction to the setbacks11 on the north and east sides of such a large building? Refer to point #3. Does ·not fit the design of the remainder of houses along Patterson Ave. The building would be too close to the road', especially as vehicles head ea~t on Patterson to approach the intersection at 203, further reducing visibility of vehicles coming from the south on 203. ~3°. · Traffic -The developer has retained a traffic engineer to study the impact of traffic from this project. A copy. is included in the·link above. According to the report, which has been accepted by the 2
Engineering Department and Ministry of Transportation, the traffic data was collected on Tuesday, February 2, 2021. The traffic engineer has calculated that the site should generate approximately 33 vehicle trips during the a.m. peak hour and 40 vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hour, and that all unsignalized intersections affected by the development would continue to operate at acceptable levels of service through 2033. The report does note that the inters·ection of 203rd and Lougheed is already over capacity~ b_ut that is occurring even without traffic generated by this site (which would have little impact on it), so it rec.om mends that the Ministry of Transportation complete a more comprehensive planning study forthat intersection. Noted: Lougheed & 203rd Intersection already "over capacity". Already 2nd highest accident location in Maple Ridgel (ICBC 2016-2020 stats). 9. Parking -The zoning bylaw requires that RM·) buildings provide 1.7 off-street parking stalls per unit. For this project, that works out to a requirement of 150 stalls, which is what is being provided. There will also be 17 visitor stalls. All resident and visitor parking for the building will be in an underground parkade. 17 __ visitor stalls in an apartment building of 88 units? Where would ({additional" visitors end up parking ... Patterson Ave? Further compounding Patterson concerns. 10. Infrastructure -The Engineering Department requires that each new development ensure adequate infrastructure is in place to accommodate it. If the existing infrastructure needs to be upgraded, it's done so at the expense of the developer. The civil engineer for this project has analyzed the sanitary and stormwater systems in place and is recommending that approximately 21m of sanitary sewer on West Street be replaced and upsized, and 162m of storm sewer on Patterson Avenue be replaced and upsized. In addition the Engineering Department is requiring upgrades to the curbs and gutters on Patterson Avenue; upgrades to the street frontages along the site at Patterson and 203rd; new sidewalks to be installed in front of the site along Patterson; new ornamental streetlights on Patterson and 203rd in front of the site; street trees; underground wiring, hydro, internet, and telephone provisions; and a communications conduit for future municipal use along 203rd. All of these will be provided at the developer's expense. The City will not permit the development to occur without adequate infrastructure. In addition to the physical infrastructure upgrades, the developer will be responsible for paying a number of fees to the City and other authorities to help pay for other new infrastructure or upgrades throughout the City. Based on today's rates, these fees would include: $768,595 in municipal development cost charges-, $375,672 for Metro Vancouver development cost charges, a $272,800 community amenity fee, $52,800 to School District 42, and $135,960 for Translink development cost charges. Infrastructure upgrades: As we noted,.the proposed development of such a scale would mean far too much major construction disruption that the residents of Patterson Ave & Ashley Crescent would have to endure. This type of development was never remotely anticipated by any of the homeowners who chose to purchase their home on these quiet residential streets so many years ago. Many of the residents are 50+ age, and are retired, living & enjoying their lives at their homes during the daytime. The noise, dirt/dust, sediment runoff, traffic delays partfcularly on Patterson, at the ONLY entrance/exit point etc. will most certainly be detrimental and _harmful to their well-being. In fact, many of these residents have already experienced significant anxiety and worries (sleepless nights) about this proposed development. Having said all of this, I realize a technical response may not alleviate your concerns about the project, so I would like to present a brief argument for higher density multi-family housing at this location in principle. I live within walking distance from the site. I often pass by it on my morning runs or after work when I take my dog and young kids for a walk before dinner, so I come to this development as a member of the community and of this neighbourhood. You mentioned you bought a home over 50 years ago; I bought mine 3
15 years ago and I'm very glad I did. There's simply no way I'd be able to afford it now. Along with every. other homeowner in our neighbourhood I've seen the value of my home skyrocket in recent years, through no effort of my own. The problem with all the increasing value we've enjoyed is that the goal of homeownership has become less and less realistic for younger generations. I would love for young families to have the same opportunities that you had, but that's not the reality anymore. Perhaps your own kids or grandkids have already experienced this as they try to enter the housing market. Housing prices have soared primarily because far too little housing has been built to keep up with demand. We could try to address this by continuing to allow the City to sprawl further and further eastward, b_ut this puts a greater strain on mu!licipal infrastructure and is harder on the environment as we encroach more and more into the forest, and people have to drive farther in their daily commutes. A better option is to build multi-family housing in the town centre and along traffic corridors like Lougheed Highway and 203rd Street, areas that are close.to transit and commercial hubs. This is why the City has identified this site for multi-family housing -they didn't err in designating it so. Unfortunately, many homeowners fail to see that opposing multi-family infill housing runs counter to best practices for building a sustainable and liveable City for everyone who wants to live there. Increasing density is the only route to a more environmentally sustainable city and to allow younger generations into the housing market. There are many homeowners of older generations, perhaps like yourself, who were able to buy a home 30, 40, or even 50 years ago when prices were more affordable. Many of these homeowners now oppose the increased density necessary to allow future families to live here too. My goal is to change this. I would like our community to welcome new generations of homeowners. During the approval process we refer to the project as having 88 11units," but to the teachers, police officers, municipal workers, and so on who will live there, it will be 88 homes. They'll start families in these homes and begin to build equity in them, like you and I have. done. I feel that those of us who have enjoyed the benefits of being able to enterthis housing market should not work to exclude the next generation of people just like us from also owning a home. Jared, you have clearly stated your "personal goal" is to "change the opposition to increased density" to allow future families to live here. The important missing perspective in this objective seems to be in ensuring that Maple Ridge continues to be a "liveable city", without "over-densified zoning". {*City councillor Gordy Robson, Maple Ridge News, Feb.11/22). Residents are already frustrated with lack of infrastructure, there's major traffic congestion/bott_lenecks/accidents. We recognize that 203rd street is a major corridor and there will be add~tional future developments occurring basically right across from the intersection area of Patterson at 203rd·. This will be a future traffic nightmare at this location, particularly with vehicles heading north to Lougheed Hwy. intersection. PLEASE, our position is the Patterson Avenue development proposal must not be allowed to proceed as it's currently proposed. 4
Regards, Jared Bissky, BA, GSC I Tekton Project Management Inc. 106 -11893 227th Street Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6H9 Ph. 604-467-8306 Cell. 604-377-3719 jared@tektonpm.com www.tektonpm.com This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. On Mar 30, 2022, at 3:22 PM, **kindly acknowledge receipt. Thank you. On Mar 30, 2022, at 1:52 PM, wrote: Name: Address: Initial thoughts: · wrote: We happened to notice on the yard sign at 20278 Patterson Ave. that there is a 10-day invitation to participate in a Public Comment Opportunity to review and discuss the proposed development at 20278 and 20292 Patterson Ave. Maple Ridge ... to seek input from the area residents on the proposed amendments from the area residents ... Firstly; there has a been a development sign on the above mentioned property since approximately 2019 and another usually situated on 203 at the east side of 20292 Patterson. With minimal pedestrian traffic walking by these signs, Patterson Ave residents and other affected neighbourhood residents such as on Ashley Crescent and Stanton Ave would hardly have been "alerted" to even notice the NEW information recently added to thes~ signs about this Public Comment Opportunity as they drive by. There hasn't been any local newspaper delivery on Patterson Avenue and the surrounding neighbourhood streets for several years now, so any notifications re: POC placed in the newspaper would not been seen by concerned/affected area residents. Furthermore, only a few residents on Patterson & other area properties . which would be significantly affected by this proposed development 5 \
received the mailed information. With Patterson Avenue lots being half-acre properties, the MR Planning Department policy of seeking comments of neighbours with 100 meters of the development is clearly not sufficiently encompassing in this case. Finally, as note_d by the MR Planni~g Dept., the timing of the dates for this PCO were essentially during the school district1s Spring Break, extended only just 3 days.to March 30th. We feel this really doesn't represent a genuine effort by Maple Ridge Planning Department to actively seek input from all the area residents that would be affected by this development proposal. HISTORY /BACKGROUND: We are the original owners of our home at ·._ since September 1970, when approximately 20 half-acre, single-family lots were bei~g built on this very unique, exclusive street in Northwest Maple Ridge. We built our 11forever home11 on Patterson Avenue, a single-entrance/exit cul-de-sac street with beautiful houses and well manicured properties. In fact, there are ·still at least 3 other Patterson Ave "original" owners of their foreve?homes, also carefully & lovingly built on Patterson Avenue. There is history of very little turnover of-the 20 houses on this street, with most residents residing for 20-30-40+ years in their homes. The houses are set well back from the street, there are no sidewalks, no street lights, no trees lining the road. We are a small and close neighbourhood community, we share the same one street, entering & exiting the only access to our street. The property along our back property line (the northside of Patterson Ave.) on Lougheed Hwy. is considered Maple Ridge, not Hammond. We have always self-identified as residents of Maple Ridge, and not of Hammond. We now realize that the Hammond Area Planning process initiated in 2014, during which local area residents, who {{self-identified" as 11Hammond residents11 expressed a desire to discuss appropriate forms, density and locati.ons for future development. Residents of Patterson Avenue were not part of that public consultation process regarding the Hammond Area growth plan; Patterson Ave residents, do not self-identify as Hammond residents, therefore did not attend open houses, did not participate in Hammond Neighbours Facebook page,and did not receive invitatjons to attend to provide input. Furthermore, we were not notified of any potential residential land zoning changes or attempts to discharge the Building Scheme restrictive covenants that were originally on the Certificates of Title for all of the properties on Patterson. Ave. These 11single family covenants11 had been placed on each of the properties in 1970 when the houses were built and sold; any changes would drastically impact each and every Patterson Avenue -resident & neighbouring area residents who have been long-time owners of these properties. Of note, when the·pfoperty on the southeast corner of Patterson & 203rd (20292} was listed for sale in 2017 /18(?), even their realtor, (a former MR councillor and Mayor), was unaware of any rezoning changes & subsequent covenant discharge on the subject property. The house was sold, then very shortly tfiereafter re-listed and sold to the current developer. Only one of the two subject properties (20292 Patterson) has a property line along 203 6
St. which is considered a major corridor for higher density zoning. The house front (address) is on Patterson Ave, not 203rd. As for the second property obtained by the developer, it is entire.ly on Patterson Ave, an established neighbourhood of Restrictive Covenant 11single family residential11 all around it. We consider the proposed 88-unit apartment structure to be "detrimental" to the residents of Patterson Ave'. As noted in the City of Maple Ridge First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw Meeting of January 21, 2020, File No: 2018-489-RZ, The Building Scheme is a private agreement, and Patterson Avenue owners will explore all options to PREVENT THIS DEVELOPMENT! We strongly OBJECT and OPPOSE this proposed development. During the First Reading to rezone the subject properties located at 20278 and 20292 Patterson Ave, affected residents from the surrounding area attended in great numbers and packed the council chambers to express their opposition. Mayor and Council had received numerous letters of concern at that time and a signed petition opposing t~is development application. The concerns raised at that time remain the same. The residents remain unfted with opposition to this development. However, we appreciate the developer, project architect and MR Planning Department asking for our thoughts at this time, indicating that our thoughts are 11important" to you. In view of the comments made above, and while also recognizing that this is not a Public Hearing notice, we ask that you carefully and thoughtfully consider the input of those who have been made aware of this Public Comment Opportunity and have taken the time to contact you either by phone or email on this proposal prior to you proceeding to Council for further consideration. The Proposed Development, a four-storey apartment block on the first two lots on Patterson Avenue is NOT supported by area residents, particularly Patterson Avenue and Ashley & Stanton neighbourhood directly south of the proposed apartment. We wish to11 retain the existing character11 of the Patterson Ave neighbourhood, in keeping with what the Hammond Area Plan encourages. In consideration of the opening statements above, below are some of the main concerns and supporting arguments to our strong OPPOSITION to this proposal: Urban Residential rand Use Policies in Maple Ridge Official Community Plan The Urban Residential infill policies support change within existing neighbourhoods, potentially including higher densities, however, 7
compatibility must be considered to ensure that redevelopment "fits" with existing neighbourhood character . ... "rather the housing form is similar in size, scale, massing and architectural elements". From Section 3.1.4 of the OCP ' This proposed 88-unit apartment does not fit the existing "Patterson Ave ;,eighbourhood11 character. Strongly OPPOSE. Neighb_ourhood Residential Infill -Policies 3-18 through 3-21 ... and of a _similar configuration to what exists in the neighbourhood today AND the proposed development form is compatible with the existing surrounding housing form. This may result in .. '.a proposal to rezone to enable subdivision to slightly smaller single-family lots than what currently exists. This does not describe the proposed four-storey 88-unit apartment. Pursuant to Section 1.5, The Role of the Area Plan, the Hammond Area Plan process produced 10 Guiding Principles to inform policy development for the Hammond Area Plan. For the purpose of opposing the apartment building proposed, we focus primarily on the following at this time: Neighbourhood Character is Retained. • Ensure new buildings fit with the character of existing buildings . • • New Development within the North Hammond Precinct should be sensitive to existing character ... • Building heights should not appear imposing to smaller existing buildings.{Policy 3-5 b) **There-are no such apartment developments anywhere in our surrounding area. The nearest four-storey apartment on the N.orthwest side of Maple Ridge is at the corner of 203 and Dewdney Trunk Road, a major transportation corridor intersection, where the parkade faces DTR. There are mainly churches, gas stations, shopping surrounding this four-storey apartment building, not a quiet, single-family housing street with one entrance/exit to the street.This proposed four-storey apartment will absolutely NOT fit with the character of existing houses on Patterson Ave. • The Katzie First Nation cemetery located on 203 St. within meters to the east of Patterson Av~. is a heritage site identified in this area. (Policy 3-8). The geotechnical study on November 12, 2018 did not include environmental evaluation of the site. A two-level underground parkade is part of this proposed development. We OPPOSE. 8
The proposal includes the following components: Rezoning from RS-1 to -' RM-2 to permit a four storey apartment building -We OPPOSE. Eighty-eight residential units -this is ev_en 8 more units than originally proposed!-We strongly OPPOSE. Therefore, considering the above mentioned policies regarding new devel9pment being sensitive to existing character, we have taken some time to review the online "material package" emailed to us from Bissky Architecture for the purposes of this POC. While we are clearly not architects able to fully comprehend the full ramifications of all the drawings and infrastructure that will be required to be in place for this proposed development, we have been able to note the following: 1. Sidewalk and street tree requirements to be confirmed by the City. Patterson Avenue does not have any sidewalks nor street trees lining the fronts of individual properties. While there are, of course, various landscaping front yard designs with primarily low bushes, shrubs, gardens, there is no consistent pattern of street trees lining the road. If this were to be done in front of the development only the first 2 properties, this would be very out-of-place and not fitting, nor sensitive to the existing character of the area. 2. Entry courtyard and amenity patio. Again, not consistent with any of the current single-family houses, where patios for outdoor social space are in backyards, not street-facing. 3. Front of the Building: As already mentioned above, there are no similar structures in the entire area other than at Dewdney and 203 intersection. Th.ese are busy, major transportation corridors, yet the building front and undergro·und parkade access is located on the busier corridor of the two, namely Dewdney. This location is completely different than Patterson Ave at 203rd, Patterson being a single entrance/exit, quiet, cul-de sac, single-family home street. We are completely opposed to the proposed Patterson Ave access design. 4. Setbacks Variance on Patterson and 203rd. The RM-2 zone permits a 7 .Sm setback from the property line on all sides of a building. The proposed development has reduced this to only 4m on Patterson Ave and 203rd. This would allow the building to be moved even closer to the street. This design, again, does NOT respect the neighbourhood. This new building would not fit the existing character of the homes on Patterson Ave, where there are no boulevards or sidewalks and front lawns qnd the houses are set back many more meters than the proposed 4m. We OPPOSE. 5. Parkade Access on Patterson: Currently with 20 individual homes on Patterson Ave, and incoming/outgoing vehicles per day, there are already significant delays primarily exiting Patterson onto 203, particularly at key times during the day (school/work start/end hours and throughout the afternoon/evening commute times with WestCoast Express 9
arrivals frorn the south of 203 each-day. as noted on the design for the parkade, the addition of 88 units and associated 150 parking stalls, this will cause a significant increase in traffic on Patterson. With traffic heading south on 203 and traffic heading north to the already overburdened Lougheed Hwy/203 intersection, this is a great concern regarding safety of residents. With only a single Entrance and Exit at the top (East) of Patterson, this would negatively impact the response in an Emergency situation, where all residents of Patterson Ave would be forced to exit the street at once onto the major corridor of 203rd Street. 6. Traffic Impact: In addition, ICBC crash records from 2016 -2020 indicate the 203 St & Lougheed Hwy is the second highest accident location in Maple Ridge. Does Maple Ridge Planning Department honestly recognize the impact of this development on the traffic burden at this already problematic intersection? We would expect greater bottleneck and s-ubsequent accidents with this addition of an 88 unit apartment not even one block from this major intersection. This is not even considering the additional traffic from future developments on 203rd Street. There are no traffic control measures in place at 203 and Patterson, nor should there be, as the Maple Ridge FireHall #3 would need quick and unimpeded access to Lougheed Hwy. 7. Infrastructure: The existing infrastructure will requ_ire major upgrading. For example, the addition of ornamental street lights along the front of the site will negatively impact the current homes, specifically those directly across the subject properties on Patterson Ave. There will be substantial work required in the area of sewer and water service. The residents of Patterson Ave will have to endure many months of disruption and the inconvenience of a major construction zone on their safe, quiet street Once again, as noted above, these residents have purchased their homes on Patterson Avenue with the knowledge and understanding of the Building Scheme Covenants on their properties and the expectation that Patterson Avenue would remain single-dwelling lots. In Conclusion: We have been Maple Ridge citizens for over 50 years; we have strongly supported local businesses, we have had our children and grandchildren attend local Maple Ridge elementary and highschools. We understand and appreciate that Hammond Land Use and Maple Ridge Council supports and plans for ({aging-in-place" for its residents, and this is what we have planned for and expect will be respected by MR Council and Planning Department. Long-time Patterson Ave home owners like ourselves expected to "age-in-place" without such a massive disruption in and around our homes due to this proposed development and the construction it would entail. 10
While the Hammond Official Plan may mc:1ke look good on paper, the reality is the proposed rezoning & development is going to have a major negative impact on the affected residents of the area. Once again, we appreciate the opportunity to present to you our thoughts and concerns regarding this development proposal. A letter to the Editor, the News, January 8, 2020 "What's Vision for Hammond?" concluded with: 11We need to wake up and see 'the so-called "public input process11 for what it is -a sham, created to give residents the illusion of meaningful input, while planners go ahead with their own pre-determined ideas of what is best for our community". We sincerely hope this will not be the case. Respectfully submitted, 11
City of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 March 16, 2022, Attention: Mayor and Council Subject: 20278 Patterson Avenue Development (2018-489-RZ/DP) We are the property owners at . in Maple Ridge. We have lived in our home for thirty-six years. This is the home that we raised our children in and had hoped to enjoy retirement for many more years. In regards to the proposed four storey apartment building at the intersection of Patterson Avenue and 203 Street, the new Hammond community plan (section 3.1.3) states the following: Ensuring that higher densities are compatible with existing character is an important consideration. Design for new development should include: a) Orienting living and activity spaces toward streets and laneways, so that opportunities for "eyes on the street" are created wherever possible; b) Careful consideration of size, location, and orientation of on-site space areas to ensure new development allows ample sunlight and a variety of plant materials and trees that are complementary to the existing mature landscaping that contributes to the neighbourhood character; c) Design that is sensitive to surrounding built form and height; particularly for building that are three (3) or more storeys in height; d) Parking for residents is provided in a concealed underground structure. We and our neighbors strongly reject this proposed development for a variety of reasons. First of which is that a development with the density that is being proposed should not be adjacent to single family detached homes. Especially when those homes are expected to remain as part of the ultimate build out of the area. All manner of privacy for us and our neighbors will be removed with the construction of a building that will tower over our property with windows allowing people to peer into our homes and yards. The existing elevation of the subject property is approximately three metres higher than Ashley Crescent. This means that while the building is four storeys, the effect to the residents on Ashley Crescent will be more like a five storey building. Apartment buildings should not be constructed next to single family homes. Density should be increased gradually as it is for most of the Hammond community plan. If the proposed development was something such as townhouses or rowhomes, that would be more appropriate and fitting in with the character of the neighborhood. 203 Street has had traffic problems for years. The problems worsened after construction of the Golden Ears bridge and the commercial property on the south east corner of Lougheed Highway and 203 Street. 203 Street has become a primary thoroughfare for people heading west along Lougheed and wish to cross the Golden Ears bridge. The problem is worsened by the fact there is a rail crossing at 203 Street and Hammond Road. The crossing also carries West Coast Express traffic which pass frequently during rush hour. It's not uncommon to see 203 Street backed from Hammond Road to Lougheed Highway almost daily. Many of the people who work at the commercial development at the corner of Lougheed Highway and 203 Street park their vehicles along 203 Street which further impacts traffic. The addition of this development would significantly increase traffic volumes. There is no rapid transit in this area, meaning
the majority of residents would be driving to and from work or school. The proposed development will have underground parking but it's typical for most buildings to only provide one parking stall for each unit for the majority of the building. That means units owned by people with multiple vehicles would be forced to park their vehicles on the road. The underground may have guest parking but it's common knowledge that there is never enough and people again would be forced to park along the road. To our knowledge a traffic assessment by a professional engineer has not been completed. If it has been completed, we would like to formally request it be sent to us for review. While the Area Plan designation for 20278 and 20292 Patterson Ave are Medium Density Multi-Family, the zoning for the property remains unchanged. We are aware that in order to have a multi-family use on the property, a rezoning application would need to be submitted to the City, and approved by Council. All rezoning applications require a Public Hearing (should Council grant second reading to the Bylaw). The Public Hearing would be advertised in the local newspaper and adjacent neighbours would receive a notification of the Public Hearing in the mail. The only notification we have received has been from the Architect of the proposed development. We would like to go on record as stating that we are adamantly opposed to any such change to the current zoning of Patterson and 203rd. We would find the construction of an apartment in particular very incompatible with the existing character of the neighbourhoods. It would not be sensitive to the surrounding builds at all and would create even more traffic congestion and parking issues. Furthermore, this will have serious impact property values for the reasons given above. It is our opinion, the proposed development at the intersection of Patterson Avenue and 203 Street should not be constructed for the reasons given above. We understand that there is a need to create additional housing in Maple Ridge but we don't feel it should be done at the expense of it's existing residents. We propose reducing the allowable density of the development to match those further along Patterson Avenue (townhomes, rowhomes, etc.). We currently have a great neighbourhood with wonderful neighbours and would see these changes as detrimental to our neighbourhood. This is certainly not what we would have expected to happen in our neighbourhood. I hope this letter has helped you better understand the impacts this development will have to our neighborhood and I hope to speak further on the issue with you in the future. Respectfully, Maple Ridge, BC
From: . Subject: Re: 2018-489-RZ; 20278 and 20292 Patterson Ave., Maple Ridge Date: March 21, 2022 at 5:17 PM To: Jared Bissky jared@tektonpm.com Hi Jared, Just wanted to add, this time not as a HUB member, that I do support this development proposal. It makes sense to increase density in this location. Best regards, Maple Ridge On Monday, March 2"1, 2022, 0"1 :"13:09 p.m. PDT, Jared Bissky <jared@tektm1r2m.com> wrote: Hi Thanks for your email, we appreciate your willingness to participate in the process. All community feedback we receive will be summarized and provided to City Staff and Council, so you can be assured that they'll see your input. Here's a link to a materials RackagS2 for the project, including architectural, civil, and landscape plans, along with the geotechnical, traffic, and arborist reports. These should give you a fuller picture of what we're proposing. The architectural and landscape plans are probably the best place to start as they show where the building will sit in relation to the site, and include renderings the building. You may be interested to know that the building includes a 28 stall long-term bike storage room. Regards, Jared Bissky I Architecture Ph. 604-467-8306 Cell. 604-377-3719 Fax. 604-467-8305 jared@tektonRm.com This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail In error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. On Mar 19, 2022, at 10:23 PM, , Hi Jared, wrote: I'm interested in the above develooment orooosal. Would it be oossible to send me available
information on this project? Thanl<s, Maple Ridge
From: _ Subject: proposed development at 20278 and 20292 Patterson ave Date: March 18, 2022 at 11 :55 AM To: jared@tektonpm.com, MayorCouncilAndCaoDL@mapleridge.ca Cc: clerks@mapleridge.ca Subject: Public comment proposed development at 20278 and 20292 Patterson ave. Regarding development application no. 2018-489-RZ We live at · Maple Ridge and so the development will be directly behind us We and our neighbours are against this development in its present form. This development would have a major impact on us. As we would be looking directly at a 4 story apartment building instead of trees and the peaks of the Golden Ears. Let alone the disruption due to the construction of this massive building. Many districts have a stepping policy which provides a buffer between single family homes and high density buildings. Why is this not being done here? Setbacks against existing homes must not be decreased and should be larger then the minimum allowed to provide some of the "stepping" as mentioned above. This development goes directly against several sections of the OCP, including: • 3.1.4 "Compatibility refers to development that "fits" with the character of a neighbourhood.etc." • 3.21 All neighbourhood and Major Corridor Residential infill developments will respect and reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of established neighbourhoods, etc. • As well there are covenants in place regarding varying from the current style of construction on Patterson. Some of the other concerns we have brought up previously, in briet are: • Lack of infrastructure in place • Noise • Traffic • Parking • Road safety • Lack of consultation with ourselves and our neighbours when the OCP was changed 2014-2017 We have an issue with standing water in our back yard and feel that this proposed development would exacerbate this. Has a ground water survey been done? There are some beautiful trees on the property. Would these be left alone? Especially the ones in the south side and south west corner. Has a traffic survey been completed especially during a work day to see the current parking issues on 203 Street? Have the Katzie First Nations been included in the planning?
What will happen if all the corners at 203 and Patterson develop as the OCP seems to allow? We would be willing to discuss options for developing this property. We are not opposed to change as we know this will happen. What we are opposed to is placing medium density buildings directly behind single family homes. What about townhouses or something not so dense?
From: _ Subject: Development Application # 20i 8-489-RZ 20278 & 20292 Patterson Avenue Date: March 28, 2022 at 4:i 5 PM To: jared@tektonpm.com Cc: planning@mapleridge.ca I recently received a notification from one of the neighbours regarding the above development application. I would like more information on it and would like to point out a couple of things, simply from my own observation. 1) I have lived here for 6 years and my husband and I purchased the home because of the quiet street of homes that actually have a yard. Unless you live on the street, there is little or no reason to come down this way unless you are visiting in the area. It is as I say, quiet, tidy and such a nice little street. 2) A few years ago, we were very unhappy to learn that without our knowledge or consent the zoning on this street was changed to allow for MULTI unit structures ... ie townhomes or apartment style buildings. 3) In about 2018 there was a few meetings at the city hall and it was almost defeated. This type of housing would not be allowed on Patterson Avenue. The one thing holding it back was one of the chair people who was not at all informed and "needed more information". The council agreed that more time was needed and it was stopped until the "Lougheed Corridor" was finished and then of course, COVID-19 hit. 4) The sign at the end of the street is back up and legible and indicates things are happening????? I have seen surveyors on the street (NOT looking at the same properties I might add) and to be honest it scares the devil out of me. 5) I understand the protocols of COVID-19 but this is a serious change to the neighborhood that is being proposed. REALLY???? A city hall meeting is absolutely required on this matter. If you have ever tried to go north on 203rd at Patterson Avenue in any type of rush hour traffic, you will have to WAIT, and WAIT. That is because there is a lot of traffic on 203rd already. I can only imagine if an 88 unit building went in on the corner. That is a lot of cars trying to jockey for position to get out in the mornings. 6) If you want to add more fun, there is the matter of the trains that at the best of times will keep you waiting for over 10 minutes at a time. The traffic is lined up to the fire hall sometimes and that is NOT a good thing. Think of the additional cars trying to again jockey for position to get out of the area. If you truly believe that this is a live, work and play community, you need to look again. 7) The latest thing I am seeing is that the developer wants to change the set backs from 7.5 m to 4 m on 203rd and Patterson Avenue. Oh, and they will add an attractive landscape I am sure. ABSOLUTELY NOT, I would not be in favor of this at a II! It is bad enough as it is, we don't need anything closer to the street. Local businesses already monopolize the
f,.JOI r-1115 Ull .£.UJ a11u II. I.:> .:>UIIIC:I.IIIIC:.:> 11a1u 1.U .:>C:C: 1.10111\.. \..Ullllll5, II. VVIII 5c:1. VVUl.:>C:, 8) I would like to know what is being planned for the property {20247 Patterson) mid street, on the north side. My understanding is that it is more than the (1) one property and perhaps the same developer but I am not sure of that. I strongly feel that the neighborhood is not being considered in this, and the city is not looking at the entire situation here. I cannot see any good coming out of the additional traffic congestion that is already a nightmare. The 203rd stretch from Dewdney to the Golden Ears Bridge (113B) is not good now, and anywhere along the stretch of Lougheed Highway between LAITY AND HARRIS ROAD will be a nightmare. The people of Pitt Meadows have already been screaming about the trains and the fact that getting onto Lougheed Highway is bad from Ford Road all the way to the Pitt River Bridge. Let us try to find a better way to increase housing. I don't think Maple Ridge is going about this correctly. I await your additional information and comments. I truly hope the City of Maple Ridge will listen to the community comments and give us a hearing so you truly know how we feel about this.
From: Subject: RE: 20278 & 20292 Patterson Avenue, Maple Ridge Date: March 30, 2022 at 7:17 PM To: Jared Bissky jared@tektonpm.com Cc: MayorCouncilAndCaoDL@mapleridge.ca Hi Jared Thanks for the materials package and your comments regarding infrastructure & your request for Set Back variances for Patterson and 203rd. The most significant comment I have regarding your 4 story building proposal is it completely ignores the incompatibility to the adjacent neighbours to the south and west side of the site. Since the time of the original development application our neighbourhood has voiced concerns regarding the height of the proposed building and how the adjacent neighbours will loose their privacy in their back yards. I have attached meeting notes from Committee of the Whole Meeting December 10, 2019 where, after meaningful discussions with the neighbourhood, the planning department recognized this negative impact and recommended (I 3-25 Maximum building height for apartment form is four stories; however, the building must be stepped down to a maximum building height of three stories where the site directly abuts a single family form on lands designated Single-Family & Compact Residential or Low-Density Multi Family" We would like to understand how we got from Planning recommending a 3 story Building design to today where all our previous discussions & submissions with Planning are ignored and you are proposal is back to a 4 story complex??? In addition, this development goes directly against several sections of the OCP, including: • 3.1.4 ({Compatibility refers to development that ({fits" with the character of a neighbourhood." • 3.21 All neighbourhood and Major Corridor Residential infill developments will respect and reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of established neighbourhoods, etc. This does not describe an 80 unit apartment building. • As well there are covenants in place regarding varying from the current style of construction on Patterson. Why can't there be a compatible building design for this property that fits into the neighbourhood, provides a buffer zone between the existing properties and meets the needs of families that are looking to live in the neighbourhood? Can you please confirm Katzie First Nation have been asked to comment on this development? As you know the Katzie Graveyard is within 100 meters of the development. Other Comments: If Engineering Department requires upgrades for infrastructure needed for this development -what happens when the other 2 lots on the north side of Patterson are developed with similar building designs and density? Will the sanitary and storm water systems have to be upgraded again?? What happens to the existing systems when other lots on Patterson are developed for Multi Family-Low density?? Additional upgrades? Increased taxes for existing property
on West Street be replaced and upsized, and 162m of storm sewer on Patterson Avenue be replaced and upsized. In addition the Engineering Department is requiring upgrades to the curbs and gutters on Patterson Avenue; upgrades to the street frontages along the site at Patterson and 203rd; new sidewalks to be installed in front of the site along Patterson; new ornamental streetlights on Patterson and 203rd in front of the site; street trees; underground wiring, hydro, internet, and telephone provisions; and a communications conduit for future municipal use along 203rd. All of these will be provided at the developer's expense. The City will not permit the development to occur without adequate infrastructure. In addition to the physical infrastructure upgrades, the developer will be responsible for paying a number of fees to the City and other authorities to help pay other new infrastructure or upgrades. Based on the today's rates, these fees would include: $768,595 in municipal development cost charges, $375,672 for Metro Vancouver development cost charges, a $272,800 community amenity fee, $52,800 to School District 42, and $135,960 for Translink development cost charges. 2. Front of the Building and Parking Access -The front of the building, including the front door and access to the underground will be on Patterson Avenue. The folks at the planning and engineering departments typically don't want to see access to underground parkades located on major streets, like 203rd Street, to avoid backing up traffic as people drive in and out. 3. Setbacks Variance on 203rd and Patterson -The RM-2 zone permits a 7.5m setback from the property line on all sides of a building. We are requesting that this be reduced to 4m on Patterson Avenue and 203rd Street with the support of the planning department, while maintaining a landscaped 7.5m setback along the south and west sides. The purpose of the setbacks is to move the building closer to the street, and to include a slightly more prominent feel to the northeast corner of the building in accordance with guidance the advisory design panel. The design team has tried to maintain a balance between keeping the scale of the building down to respect the neighbourhood, while raising the roof and height of the glazing as the northeast corner of the building on the top floor. You'll also notice as you review the landscape plans that beyond the 4m landscaped setback along 203rd Street and Patterson Avenue there will be a boulevard with street trees and a sidewalk, so the building will still not have the feeling of being immediately up against the road. Regards, Jared Bissky, BA, GSC I Tekton Project Management Inc. 106 -11893 227th Street Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6H9 Ph. 604-467-8306 Cell. 604-377-3719 jared@tektonQm.com www.tektonQm.com
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. On Mar 14, 2022, at 3:27 PM, Thanks Jared · wrote: Its tough to provide meaningful comments without having at least a few details on the design of the building. Can you please send me a few street views of the building and show the layout on the property. What infrastructure will be part of the development? Sidewalks, left turn lanes on 203rd, street lighting etc. Is the front of the building on 203rd7 Access to underground parking off Patterson? Why are you asking for the set back variances??? Thanks From: Jared Bissky <jared@tektongm.com> Sent: March 14, 2022 2:40 PM To:. Subject: Re: 20278 & 20292 Patterson Avenue, Maple Ridge Hi Thanks for your email. In answer to your questions, the City's policy requires that notification letters to be mailed to all property owners and residents within 100 metres of the development site. The folks at the Planning Department generate the list and provide us with the mailing labels, then we mail out the letters. The policy also requires us to place two ads in the local newspaper, and a sticker on the
Ut::Vt::IUfJI I lt::I IL 11 IIUI I I ldLIUI I =>lbl ,, VVI 11\...11 vve Vt:: UUI It::, If you have any questions or feedback, please feel free to email me again. All correspondence we receive will be summarized and provide to City Staff and Council, so you can be assured that they'll see your input. Regards, Jared Bissky, BA, GSC I Tekton Project Management Inc. 106 -11893 227th Street Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6H9 Ph. 604-467-8306 Cell. 604-377-3719 jared@tektonRm.com www.tektonP-m,com This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an Intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. On Mar 14, 2022, at 1:48 PM, wrote: From: Sent: March 5, 2022 3:14 PM To: 1jarod@tektonP-m.com1 <jarod@tektonr2m.com> Subject: 20278 & 20292 Patterson Avenue, Maple Ridge Thank you for sending your letter asking for comments on the above development application. Wondering if you can provide details on where or which neighbourhoods your letter was sent to. Just want to confirm who and to what extent you are asking for input. Best Regards
From: _ Subject: Public comment proposed development at 20278 and 20292 Patterson ave. Maple Ridge development application no. 2018-489-RZ Date: March 13, 2022 at i :40 PM To: jared@tektonpm.com, MayorCouncilAndCaoDL@mapleridge.ca Regarding development application no. 2018-489-RZ My wife and I have resided at for 30 years. This is the home where we have raised our children and hope to enjoy retirement. We and our neighbours are 100% against this development. So reducing the setbacks will not be discussed. This development would have a major impact on us. As we would be looking directly at a 4 story apartment building instead of trees and the peaks of the Golden Ears. Let alone the disruption due to the construction of this massive building. This development goes directly against several sections of the OCP, including: • 3.1.4 "Compatibility refers to development that "fits" with the character of a neighbourhood.etc." • 3.21 All neighbourhood and Major Corridor Residential infill developments will respect and reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of established neighbourhoods, etc. • As well there are covenants in place regarding varying from the current style of construction on Patterson. Some of the other concerns we have brought up previously, in brief, are: • Lack of infrastructure in place • Noise • Traffic • Parking • Road safety • Lack of consultation with ourselves and our neighbours when the OCP was changed 2014-2017 We would be willing to discuss options for developing this property but an apartment building would not be one of them. Be warned we will fight tooth and nail and press the mayor and council at every opportunity to have this development stopped.
11051~1-mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer First and Second Reading MEETING DATE: May 17, 2022 FILE NO: 2022-159-RZ MEETING: C o W Termination and Replacement of Land Use Contract Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7853-2022 21973 132 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In May 2014, the Province made changes to the Local Government Act to require all Land Use Contracts (LUCs) in British Columbia to automatically terminate on June 30, 2024 and for municipalities to enact zoning regulations for all properties affected by LUCs prior to June 30, 2022. Three bundles of rezoning bylaws have been adopted and the subject property is the last of these requiring rezoning. The subject property is currently designated Agricultural in the Official Community Plan (OCP), reflecting its inclusion within the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR), and assessed as "Farm" under the Assessment Act (Farm Status). The LUC currently permits a variety of uses including a horse arena, a tennis court, a swimming pool, a meeting room, and a members-only kitchenette and lounge and the property has been operating as the Maple Ridge Equi Sports Centre for many years. The restaurant portion of the Equi Sports Centre is known as 'The Ranch Pub and Grill', which started out as a members-only kitchenette and lounge in 1983, as permitted by the LUC and Agricultural Land Commission (ALC). This lounge and kitchenette have since evolved into the current restaurant use, which was the subject of the Non-Farm Use application. Because the current restaurant use does not align with the original more limited members-only lounge use, a Non-Farm Use Application was required, and the property owner made this application in August 2021 (ALC Application 63251) and Council forwarded the application to the ALC in September 2021. On April 22, 2022, the ALC approved the full-service restaurant use, permitting up to 185 patrons, under three conditions: 1) that the restaurant building is not expanded; 2) the number of permitted patrons is not exceeded; and 3) the property owner agrees to rescind the ALC resolution from 1978 that permitted the construction of four covered racquet courts and swimming pool. The property owner has agreed to the ALC's conditions. The purpose of this report is to present a zone amending bylaw for the subject property at 21973 132 Avenue and the creation of a new zone, CD-1-22 (Appendix B). The proposed zone, in Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7853-2022, CD-1-22 (Equestrian Facility and Restaurant), is drafted to replicate the siting of what is currently permitted through the LUC, along with the equestrian and restaurant uses based on the present ALC decision and regulations. A restaurant use is considered a Non-Farm Use in the Agricultural Land Reserve and OCP Policy 6-10 permits Non-Farm Uses on properties designated Agricultural if approved by the Agricultural Land Commission and the City. Doc# 3069176 Page 1 of 6
RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7853-2022 be given first and second reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. 1.0 BACKGROUND: Between 1971 and 1978, the Municipal Act (now called the Local Government Act) allowed local governments to enter into LUCs with property owners. In May 2014, the Province made changes to the Local Government Act requiring municipalities to enact zoning regulations for all properties affected by LUCs prior to June 30, 2022 and that all LUCs will automatically be terminated after June 30, 2024. At the October 13, 2020 Council Workshop meeting, the process for early termination of LUCs and the strategy to meet provincial deadlines was presented. The strategy is to bring bundles of rezoning bylaws to Council meetings over the course of 2021 and 2022. To ensure the process and implications were clearly communicated to property owners, staff mailed tailored information packages to all property owners involved, created a page on the City's website that includes general information on LUCs and invited all affected property owners to an information session. However, the information session was cancelled due to low registration of property owners and staff have been meeting with interested property owners on a case-by-case basis. A Development Information Meeting is not required as no new development is being proposed. On April 27, 2021, the first bundle of seven rezoning bylaws for properties with a LUC was adopted. On July 27, 2021, the second bundle of seven rezoning bylaws for properties with a LUC was adopted. The third bundle involved five LUC's, wherein separate reports were prepared due to greater complexities with each one, and to date four of these have had underlying zoning adopted (as of March 29, 2022), leaving this final LUC to proceed through the rezoning process. The subject property within this report (as well as all other properties involved in the LUC removal process) will continue to be regulated by the current LUC, even upon adoption of new underlying zoning, until June 30, 2024, when all LUCs in the Province will be automatically terminated. Should a property owner want to voluntarily discharge the LUC on title prior to June 30, 2024, the property owner can sign a "Consent Agreement" with the City and a zone amending bylaw can go through four readings and a public hearing. This approach allows property owners the option to keep their LUC or discharge the LUC if they are considering new construction, subdivision, or uses (i.e. secondary suites, etc.). The subject property located at 21973 132 Avenue is currently regulated by a LUC established in 197 4, and amended in 1982 and 1983 to permit the use of: • One Single Family Dwelling • One Office • One Instruction and meeting room, related only to the operation of the Centre • One Grooms quarters • One House Arena • One Tennis Court • The Boarding of Horses Doc# 3069176 Page 2 of 6
b) Site Characteristics The subject property is located on the north side of 132 Avenue, east side of Park Lane, south of the North Alouette Greenway and south-west of the North Alouette River (See Appendix A). The topography is relatively flat and there are some trees located around the perimeter of the property. Access to the subject property is located from 220 Street. The total area is approximately 6.45 ha (16 acres) with the restaurant use located in the south-east corner. The subject property operates as the Maple Ridge Equi-Sports Centre, which is an equestrian-based facility that provides boarding, lessons and a range of competitions and horse shows throughout the year. The facility is made up of a series of riding rings, barns, a single-family dwelling and a full-service restaurant (The Ranch Pub and Grill). The larger facility has been in operation since 197 4 with equestrian and recreational uses implemented through a LUC. A members-only kitchenette and lounge were permitted in 1983, as part of an amendment to the LUC, with permission from the ALC; however, it is noted that this lounge and kitchenette has evolved into a full-service restaurant. The subject property is assessed as "Farm" under the Assessment Act (Farm Status) for the training and boarding of horses. c) Official Community Plan: The subject property is located within the ALR and is designated Agricultural in the OCP. The City of Maple Ridge recognizes that agriculture is a vital component of the community's rural character and local economy. There is an acknowledgement that agriculture can occur in different forms throughout the community, and as such, Agri-Tourism is recognized as one such use. As stated in section 6.2.1 Economic Development Strategy of the OCP, "Agri-Tourism is a form of tourism that attracts visitors who are interested in experiencing forms of agriculture and agriculturally related aspects of an area". The subject application is currently providing equestrian-based agri-tourism uses, which are currently permitted through ALR regulations and the LUC. It should be noted that the restaurant use plays a complimentary and significant role to the existing agri-tourism uses through the provision of food and beverage services to those participating in the various facility activities and events. A restaurant use is considered a Non-Farm Use in the ALR and OCP Policy 6-10 permits Non-Farm Uses on properties designated Agricultural if approved by the ALC and the City. The following policies in the OCP are supportive of the existing equestrian-based uses and further supports the restaurant use in its complimentary role to the Maple Ridge Equi-Sports Centre. In Section 6.5 Additional Employment Generating Opportunities, OCP Policies 6-67 and 6-68 state the following: 6-67 Maple Ridge will actively promote and market the outdoor resource theme by: a) supporting and strengthening businesses that cater to tourists; b) supporting businesses involved with outdoor recreational activities and physical fitness; c) facilitating growth in the eco-tourism, cycling and equestrian industry. 6-68 Maple Ridge will promote agricultural tourism opportunities by: a) Aligning land use bylaws to permit supportive non-farm uses such as agri-tourism, bed and breakfasts, and on-farm sales; b) Assisting agricultural landowners to identify and develop agricultural opportunities (e.g. value added, agri-tourism, bed and breakfast, recreation). Doc# 3069176 Page 4 of 6
d) Agricultural Plan: The Maple Ridge Agricultural Plan identifies a long-term vision for Agriculture in Maple Ridge. Language within the Agricultural Plan includes reference to diversifying agricultural activities, whereby: Diverse agricultural activity occurs on farms of all sizes and uses many channels to distribute agricultural products and services to the consumer public. And further identified in 'Goal 8' of the Agricultural Plan: Pursuing diversity in local agriculture is a way of ensuring that agricultural land use is capable of adaptive response to, and recovery from, challenges to food security, and other amenities valued by society. More diversity creates more ability for successful response and promotes resiliency in agricultural land use. Diversified agricultural activity (equestrian, agro-tourism) will protect the land base through active use, create demand for services and workers, and support the infrastructure a/so required for food production. e) Planning Analysis The current primary use of the property is an equestrian facility and has been assessed as "Farm" under the Assessment Act (Farm Status) for several years. The restaurant/lounge is an accessory use that has been permitted since 1982 through a LUC amendment that was approved by the ALC. However, because the restaurant/lounge use has expanded over the years, the approval process for underlying zoning could not proceed with the current use of the restaurant/lounge without ALC approval through a Non-Farm Use application. A Non-Farm Use Application (ALC Application 63251) was received in August 2021 to permit the existing full-service restaurant within the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) and Council forwarded the application to the ALC in September 2021. On April 22, 2022, the ALC approved the full-service restaurant use, permitting up to 185 patrons, under three conditions: 1) that the size of the restaurant is not expanded; 2) the number of permitted patrons is not exceeded; and 3) the property owner agrees to rescind the ALC resolution from 1978 that permitted the construction offour covered racquet courts and swimming pool. The property owner has agreed to the ALC's conditions. The proposed zone in Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7853-2022, CD-1-22 (Equestrian Facility and Restaurant) is drafted to replicate the siting of buildings that are currently permitted through the LUC, as well as the equestrian and restaurant uses based on the recent ALC decision and current regulations. A restaurant use is considered a non-farm use in the ALR and OCP Policy 6-10 supports Non-Farm Uses on properties designated Agricultural if approved by the Agricultural Land Commission and the City. 3.0 CONCLUSION: In May 2014, the Province made changes to the Local Government Act to require all LUCs in British Columbia to automatically terminate on June 30, 2024 and for municipalities to enact zoning regulations for all properties affected by LUCs prior to June 30, 2022. The subject property is the last property in the third and final bundle of properties requiring underlying zoning in replacement of a LUC. Doc# 3069176 Page 5 of 6
This report presents Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7853-2022 for the subject property and the creation of a new zone, CD-1-22 (Appendix 8). The underlying zoning that is proposed for the subject property replicates the uses currently allowed in the ALR and the April 2022 decision by the ALC to permit a non-farm (restaurant) use that is currently operating on the property. "Original signed by Krista Gowan" Prepared by: Krista Gowan, MA Planner 1 "Original signed by Mark McMullen" for Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning and Development "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map and Ortho Map Appendix B -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7853-2022 Doc# 3069176 Page 6 of 6
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7853-2022 APPENDIX B A Bylaw to amend the text forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600 -2019 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to create a new comprehensive development zone called "CD-1-22 Equestrian Facility and Restaurant"; AND WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7853-2022." 2. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 is hereby amended by inserting the following definition after the "ENDS and ENNDS" definition in PART 202 DEFINTIONS: EQUESTRIAN FACILITY means a Use designed and intended for the display of equestrian skills and the hosting of events including, but not limited to, show jumping, dressage, and similar events of other equestrian disciplines. The facility may include the boarding of horses, one office, and one instruction room for the operation of the facility. Facilities for horse riding do not include a racetrack that is or must be licensed by the British Columbia Racing Commission. 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 is hereby amended by inserting the following CD Zone immediately following the last section in PART 10 COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT ZONES and numbering it in sequential order accordingly: 10XX 10XX.1 10XX.2 10XX.3 CD-1-22 Equestrian Facility and Restaurant PURPOSE 1. This zone provides for an "Equestrian Facility and Restaurant" use for Parcel "9" Section 30 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 66399, 21973 132 Avenue, Maple Ridge. PRINCIPAL USES 1. The following Principal Uses Shall be permitted in this Zone; a. Agricultural b. Single Detached Residential ACESSORY USES 1. Agricultural Employee Residential 2. Boarding 3. Detached Garden Suite 4. Produce Sales 5. Rental Stable 6. Restaurant, limited to 185 patrons 7. Secondary Suite 8. Tennis Court (maximum of one)
10XX.4 10XX.5 10XX.6 10XX.7 10XX.8 LOT AREA AND DIMENSIONS 1. Minimum Lot Area and dimensions shall be not less than; a. in Lot Area 6 hectares b. in Lot Width 75.0 metres c. in Lot Depth 150.0 metres 2. Refer to Section 407 Building Envelope of the Bylaw for required minimum Building Envelope dimensions DENSITY N/A LOT COVERAGE 1. All Principal Buildings and Principal Structures and Accessory Buildings and Accessory Structures together shall not exceed a Lot Coverage of 5%. 2. All buildings associated with an accessory restaurant use shall not be expanded unless approval is granted from the Agricultural Land Commission. SETBACKS 1. Minimum Setbacks for all Principal Building and Principal Structures shall be not less than: a. from a Front Lot Line b. from a Rear Lot Line c. from an Interior Side Lot Line d. from an Exterior Side Lot Line 35 metres 12 metres 20 metres 26 metres 2. The minimum Setbacks for Accessory Use Buildings and Structures shall be not less than: a. from a Front Lot Line 7.5 metres b. from a Rear Lot Line 7.5 metres C. from an Interior Side Lot Line 1.5 metres d. from an Exterior Side Lot Line 4.5 metres e. from the Building Face of a Building for a Residential Use 3.0 metres 3. For Lots within the Agricultural Land Reserve and that are subject to the Agricultural Land Commission Act and its Regulations, Section 402 (Farm Home Plate) of this Bylaw shall apply. HEIGHT 1. Building Height for Single Detached Residential use shall not exceed 9.5 metres. 2. Building Height for other Accessory Buildings and Accessory Structures shall not exceed 8.5 metres.
10XX.9 10XX.10 PARKING AND LOADING 1. The Off-Street Parking and Off-Street Loading shall be provided with a maximum of 70 parking stalls with an agricultural and accessory restaurant use. OTHER REQUIREMENTS 1. The Agricultural Land Commission Act and its Regulations shall prevail. 3. That parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: PARCEL "9" SECTION 30 TOWNSHIP 12 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 66399 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1971 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to CD-1-22 Equestrian Facility and Restaurant. 4. Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of READ a second time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER , 20 ,20 ,20 ,20 ,20 CORPORATE OFFICER
11061~•-mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council MEETING DATE: May 17, 2022 FILE NO: 2019-244-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C o W SUBJECT: First, Second and Third Reading Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7855-2022 12155 Edge Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A condition of third reading of Zoning Application 2019-244-RZ is that there be a Housing Agreement to secure 100% of the 209 units in the five-storey apartment building as market rental units. The agreement includes the following unit mix: 128 One-Bedroom Units, 40 Studio Units and 41 Two-Bedroom Units. With the Housing Agreement in place the application will be exempt from paying a Community Amenity Contribution to the City. A Housing Agreement must be created through a bylaw. Therefore, it is recommended that Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7855-2022 be given first, second and third reading. RECOMMENDATION: That Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7855-2022 be given first, second and third reading. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: 2019-244-RZ Townline Homes Inc. c/o Mr Ross Moore Lot 305 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 46852 Low-Rise Apartment Low-Rise Apartment Land Use Contract L 7 4462 RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Apartment CD-1-21 Medium Density Rental Apartment Residential Low-Rise Apartment Vacant Land RS-1 (One Detached Residential) Park Page 1 of 2
East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Eric Langton Elementary School P-1 (Park and School) Institutional Apartment Zone: Designation: CD-5-94 (Apartment Use & Elderly Citizens Rec Assoc. Centre) Medium and High-Rise Apartment Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Concurrent Applications: c) Project Description: Vacant Purpose built rental apartments 0.706 ha (1.72 acres) Edge Street Urban Standard 2019-244-RZ/DP /DVP The subject property is located at 12155 Edge Street and has an application to discharge Land Use Contract (LUC) L 7 4462 and LUC Modification Agreement U101211 and rezone the subject property RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential), to permit a five-storey, 209 market rental unit apartment building. The subject application is exempt from paying the Community Amenity Contribution, Policy 6.31, as the applicant is proposing 100% of the units as rental to be secured through a Housing Agreement with the City. The Housing Agreement must be created through a bylaw (Appendix C). CONCLUSION: The Housing Agreement will secure the 209 market rental apartment units, it recommended that first, second and third reading by given to Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7855-2022. "Original signed by Wendy Cooper" Prepared by: Wendy Cooper, M.Sc., MCIP,RPP Planner "Original signed by Charles Goddard" Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Charles Goddard" for Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -12155 Edge Street Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7855-2022 2019-244-RZ Page 2 of 2
TERMS OF INSTRUMENT -PART 2 HOUSING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, dated for reference the_ day of ___ 2022, BETWEEN: AND: EDGE STREET HOLDINGS LTD. Suite 1212 -450 SW Marine Drive Vancouver, B.C. V5X OC3 (the "Owner") THE CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, B. C. V2X 6A9 (the "City") WITNESSES THAT WHEREAS: A The Owner is the registered owner of the Lands. B. The City is a municipal corporation incorporated pursuant to the Act. SCHEDULE 1 C. As a condition of the Rezoning Bylaw, the Owner has agreed to enter into a housing agreement with the City in accordance with section 483 of the Act. D. Section 483 authorizes the City, by bylaw, to enter into a housing agreement in respect of the form of tenure of housing units, availability of such units to classes of identified person, administration and management of such units and the rent that may be charged for such units. E. Section 219 of the Land Title Act permits registration of a covenant in favour of a municipality in respect of the use of land or the use of a building on or to be erected on land and that land is or is not to be built on except in accordance with this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) now paid by the City to the Owner and for other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which the Owner hereby acknowledges), the Owner and the City covenant each with the other as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS a) "Act" means the Local Government Act, RSBC. 2015 c.1 as amended from time to time; b) "Agreement" means this agreement as amended from time to time; c) "Commencement Date" has the meaning set out in section 2.1 herein; d) "Council" means the municipal council for the City; e) "Director of Planning" means th-a chief administrator of the Department of Planning of the City and his or her successors in function and their respective nominees; f) "Dwelling Unit" means a dwelling unit as defined in the City's Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended from time to time; Terms of Instrument-Part 2, Housing Agreement-PIO: 006-147-828 Lot 305 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 46852 Page 1 of 7
g) "Lands" means those lands and premises legally described as: PIO: 006-147-828 Lot 305 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 46852; h) "Market Rental Units" means Dwelling Units that are rented to tenants for market rental rates as set by the Owner; i) "Rental Purposes" means an occupancy or intended occupancy which is or would be governed by a tenancy agreement as defined in Section 1 of the Residential Tenancy Act, SBC 2002 c. 78 as amended from time to time between the Owner and the tenant; j) "Rental Units" means the Market Rental Units; k) "Residential Building" means the 5 storey building to be constructed on the Lands to be used for Rental Purposes with 209 Dwelling Units, all of which Dwelling Units will be Market Rental Units; I) "RT Act" means the Residential Tenancy Act, SBC 2002 c. 78; and m) "Rezoning Bylaw" means the rezoning bylaw applicable to the Lands described as "Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7567-2019". 2. TERM 2.1 . This Agreement will commence upon adoption by Council of "Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7855-2022", (the "Commencement Date") and will continue in perpetuity. 2.2. Notwithstanding the foregoing grant in perpetuity, this Agreement will terminate immediately upon the removal or destruction of the Residential Building provided the Residential Building is not repaired or rebuilt following the destruction thereof. 2.3. Subject to section 7.3, upon termination of this Agreement, this Agreement will be at an end and of no further force and effect. 3. USE OF LANDS 3.1. Pursuant to Section 219 of the Land Title Act, the Owner covenants and agrees with the City that during the term of this Agreement, notwithstanding the Rezoning Bylaw, the Lands shall be used and built on only in strict compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and that: a. the Lands shall not be subdivided or stratified; b. the Residential Building shall be used for Rental Purposes only; and c. no Rental Unit in the Residential Building shall be occupied for any purpose except for Rental Purposes. 3.2. The Owner further covenants and agrees with the City that the Lands and any buildings or structures constructed thereon including the Residential Building shall be developed, built and maintained in accordance with all City bylaws, regulations and guidelines as amended from time to time. 4. TENANCY RESTRICTIONS 4.1. The unit mix for Rental Units in the Residential Building shall be no fewer than 128 one-bedroom units, 41 two-bedroom units and 40 studio units or as otherwise approved in writing by the Director of Planning in his or her discretion. Terms of Instrument -Part 2, Housing Agreement -PIO: 006-147-828 Lot 305 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 46852 Page 2 of 7
5. OWNER'S OBLIGATIONS Without limiting section 3.1 of this Agreement: a. Management and administration: the management, administration, and associated costs with the management and administration of the Rental Units will be borne by the Owner or its designated rental agent, unless otherwise approved by the City in writing; b. Compliance with applicable laws: without restricting the foregoing, the Owner will comply with all applicable provisions of the RT Act and any other provincial or municipal enactments imposing obligations on landlords in relation to residential tenancies; c. Performance: the Owner will perform its obligations under this Agreement diligently and in good faith; and d. Evidence of compliance: provided that the same can be done without breaching the Personal Information Protection Act (as amended from time to time) the Owner will, at Business License renewal or upon request by the City, supply to the City copies of any documentation in possession of the Owner necessary to establish compliance with the Owner's obligations under this Agreement. 6. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES 6.1. The City may, acting reasonably, give to the Owner a written notice (in this section 6.1, the "Notice") requiring the Owner to cure a default under this Agreement within 30 days of receipt of the Notice. The Notice must specify the nature of the default. The Owner must act with diligence to correct the default within the time specified. 6.2. The Owner will pay to the City on demand by the City all the City's costs of exercising its rights or remedies under this Agreement, on a full indemnity basis. 6.3. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that in case of a breach of this Agreement which is not fully remediable by the mere payment of money and promptly so remedied, the harm sustained by the City and to the public interest will be irreparable and not susceptible of adequate monetary compensation. 6.4. Each party to this Agreement, in addition to its rights under this Agreement or at law, will be entitled to all equitable remedies including specific performance, injunction and declaratory relief, or any of them, to enforce its rights under this Agreement. 6.5. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that it is entering into this Agreement to benefit the public interest in providing housing for Rental Purposes, and that the City's rights and remedies under this Agreement are necessary to ensure that this purpose is carried out and that the City's rights and remedies under this Agreement are fair and reasonable and ought not to be construed as a penalty or forfeiture. 6.6. No reference to nor exercise of any specific right or remedy under this Agreement or at law or at equity by any party will prejudice, limit or preclude that party from exercising any other right or remedy. No right or remedy will be exclusive or dependent upon any other right or remedy, but any party, from time to time, may exercise any one or more of such rights or remedies independently, successively, or in combination. The Owner acknowledges that specific performance, injunctive relief (mandatory or otherwise) or other equitable relief may be the only adequate remedy of a default by the Owner under this Agreement. 7. LIABILITY 7.1 Except for the negligence of the City or its employees, agents or contractors, the Owner will indemnify and save harmless each of the City and its elected officials, board members, officers, directors, employees, and agents, and their heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, successors and assigns, from and against all claims, demands, actions, loss, damage, costs and liabilities, which all or any of them will or may be liable for or suffer or incur or be put to by reason of or arising out of: a. any act or omission by the Owner, or its officers, directors, employees, agents, contractors, or other persons for whom at law the Owner is responsible; and b. the Owner's ownership, operation, management or financing of the Lands for the provision of housing for Rental Purposes. Terms of Instrument -Part 2, Housing Agreement -PIO: 006-147-828 Lot 305 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 46852 Page 3 of7
7.2. Except to the extent such advice or direction is given negligently, the Owner hereby releases and forever discharges the City, its elected officials, board members, officers, directors, employees and agents, and its and their heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, successors and assigns from and against all claims, demands, damages, actions or causes of action by reason of or arising out of advice or direction respecting the ownership, operation or management of the Lands for the provision of housing for Rental Purposes which has been or hereafter may be given to the Owner by all or any of them. 7.3. The covenants of the Owner set out in sections 7.1 and 7.2 of this Agreement will survive the expiration or the earlier termination of this Agreement and will continue to apply to any breach of the Agreement and to any claims arising under this Agreement during the ownership by the Owner of the Lands. 8. GENERAL PROVISIONS 8.1 . The Owner agrees to reimburse the City for all legal costs reasonably incurred by the City for the preparation, execution and registration of this Agreement. The Owner will bear their own costs, legal or otherwise, connected with the preparation, execution or registration of this Agreement. 8.2. Nothing in this Agreement: a. affects or limits any discretion, rights, powers, duties or obligations of the City under any enactment or at common law, including in relation to the use or subdivision of land; b. affects or limits any enactment relating to the use of the Lands or any condition contained in any approval including any development permit concerning the development of the Lands; or c relieves the Owner from complying with any enactment, including the City's bylaws in relation to the use of the Lands. 8.3 The Owner and the City agree that a. this Agreement is entered into only for the benefit of the City; b. this Agreement is not intended to protect the interests of the Owner, occupier or user of the Lands or any portion of it including the Rental Units and the Limited Common Property; and c. without limiting part 2 of this Agreement, the City may at any time execute a release and discharge of this Agreement in respect of the Lands, without liability to anyone for doing so. 8.4 This Agreement burdens and runs with the Lands and any part into which any of them may be subdivided or consolidated, by strata plan or otherwise. All of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement are made by the Owner for itself, its successors and assigns, and all persons who acquire an interest in the Lands after the date of this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Owner will not be liable for any breach of any covenant, promise or agreement herein in respect of any portion of the Lands sold, assigned, considered or otherwise disposed of, occurring after the Owner has ceased to be the owner of the Lands. 8.5 The covenants and agreements on the part of the Owner in this Agreement have been made by the Owner as contractual obligations as well as being made pursuant to section 483 of the Act and as such will be binding on the Owner. 8.6 The Owner will, at its expense, do or cause to be done all acts reasonably necessary to ensure this Agreement is registered against the title to the Lands, including any amendments to this Agreement as may be required by the Land Title Office or the City to effect such registration. 8. 7 The City and the Owner each intend by execution and delivery of this Agreement to create both a contract and a deed under seal. Terms of Instrument-Part 2, Housing Agreement -PIO: 006-147-828 Lot 305 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 46852 Page 4 of7
8.8 An alleged waiver by a party of any breach by another party of its obligations under this Agreement will be effective only if it is an express waiver of the breach in writing. No waiver of a breach of this Agreement is deemed or construed to be a consent or waiver of any other breach of this Agreement. 8.9. If a Court of competent jurisdiction finds that any part of this Agreement is invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, that part is to be considered to have been severed from the rest of this Agreement and the rest of this Agreement remains in force unaffected by that holding or by the severance of that part. 8.1 O Every obligation of a party which is set out in this Agreement will extend throughout the term of this Agreement and, to the extent that any obligation ought to have been observed or performed prior to or upon the expiry or earlier termination of the term of this Agreement, such obligation will survive the expiry or earlier termination of the term of this Agreement until it has been observed or performed. 8.11 All notices, demands, or requests of any kind, which a party may be required or permitted to serve on another in connection with this Agreement, must be in writing and may be served on the other parties by registered mail, by facsimile or e-mail transmission, or by personal service, to the addresses set out above or such other address or email address provided by either party from time to time. Service of any such notice, demand, or request will be deemed complete, if made by registered mail, 72 hours after the date and hour of mailing, except where there is a postal service disruption during such period, in which case service will be deemed to be complete only upon actual delivery of the notice, demand or request; if made by facsimile or e-mail transmission, on the first business day after the date when the facsimile or e-mail transmission was transmitted; and if made by personal service, upon personal service being effected. Any party, from time to time, by notice in writing served upon the other parties, may designate a different address or different or additional persons to which all notices, demands, or requests are to be addressed. 8.12 Upon request by the City, the Owner will promptly do such acts and execute such documents as may be reasonably necessary, in the opinion of the City, to give effect to this Agreement. 8.13 This Agreement will enure to the benefit of and be binding upon each of the parties and their successors and permitted assigns. 9. INTERPRETATION 9.1. Gender specific terms include both genders and include corporations. Words in the singular include the plural, and words in the plural include the singular. 9.2 The division of this Agreement into sections and the use of headings are for convenience of reference only and are not intended to govern, limit or aid in the construction of any provision. In all cases, the language in this Agreement is to be construed simply according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against either party. 9.3. The word "including" when following any general statement or term is not to be construed to limit the general statement or term to the specific items which immediately follow the general statement or term to similar items whether or not words such as "without limitation" or "but not limited to" are used, but rather the general statement or term is to be construed to refer to all other items that could reasonably fall within the broadest possible scope of the general statement or term. 9.4. The words "must" and "will" are to be construed as imperative. 9.5. Any reference in this Agreement to any statute or bylaw includes any subsequent amendment, reenactment, or replacement of that statute or bylaw. 9.6. This is the entire agreement between the City and the. Owner concerning its subject, and there are no warranties, representations, conditions or collateral agreements relating to the subject matter of this Agreement, except as included in this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended only by a document executed by the parties to this Agreement and by bylaw, such amendment to be effective only upon adoption by City Council of an amending bylaw to "Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7855-2022". Terms of Instrument -Part 2, Housing Agreement -PIO: 006-147-828 Lot 305 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 46852 Page 5 of7
9. 7 This Agreement is to be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of British Columbia. 9.8 This Agreement can be signed in counterpart. IN WITNESS WHEREOF each of the City and the Owner have executed this Agreement under seal by their duly authorized officers as of the reference date of this Agreement. 10. DEED AND CONTRACT By executing and delivering this Agreement each of the parties intends to create both a contract and a deed executed and delivered under seal. As evidence of their agreement to be bound by this Agreement, the Covenanter and the City have executed the Land Title Act Form C or D, as the case may be, attached to and forming part of this Agreement. EDGE STREET HOLDINGS LTD., By its authorized signatory(s): CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE By its authorized signatory(s): Terms of Instrument-Part 2, Housing Agreement -PIO: 006-147-828 Lot 305 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 46852 Page6of7
CONSENT & PRIORITY The Lender in consideration of the payment of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged) hereby consents to the registration of the Covenant herein granted under Section 219 of the Land Title Act, running with the said lands and against the said lands and the Lender hereby postpones all of its rights under the Mortgage and Assignment of Rents registered respectively under No. and __ (the "Lender Documents") to those rights of the District under the Covenant herein in the same manner and to the same extent and effect as if the Covenant herein had been dated, granted and registered prior to the Lender Documents. Terms of Instrument -Part 2, Housing Agreement -PIO: 006-147-828 Lot 305 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 46852 Page 7 of?
1107<~1•• mapleridge.ca City of Maple Ridge TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Michael Morden and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Development Variance Permit 20425 Hampton Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: May 17, 2022 2022-014-DVP cow Development Variance Permit application 2022-014-DVP has been received to permit the construction of a new single-family dwelling. The requested variance is to: 1. Increase the maximum principal building height in the RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Zone from 8.0 metres to 9.6 metres. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2022-014-DVP be approved. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2022-014-DVP respecting property located at 20425 Hampton Street; and 2. That a restrictive covenant be authorized to be registered on title to prohibit the construction of a Secondary Suite on the property. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: 2022-014-VP Amrik Singh Kaurah Lot 320 District Lot 279 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 114 Low Density Multi-Family Low Density Multi-Family RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Single-Family Page 1 of 3
Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Lot Size: Previous Applications: b) Project Description: RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Low Density Multi-Family Single-Family, Vacant Lots RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Low Density Multi-Family Single-Family RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Low Density Multi-Family Single-Family RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) Low Density Multi-Family Vacant Lot Single-Family Residential 668.5 m2 Hampton Street Urban Standard 668.5 m2 Board of Variance (October 5, 2021) The proposed building height variance is for the construction of a new single-family dwelling in the Hammond Area, located on Hampton Street (Appendices A and B). The applicant previously attended the Board of Variance meeting on October 5, 2021 (see Appendix D). At the Board of Variance meeting, the applicant noted that when they purchased the property, the previous Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 allowed an 11.0 metres building height (to the top of the roof) and they had based their house drawings on this requirement. Under the new Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019, adopted in December 2020, the maximum permitted height is now 8.0 metres (to the mid-point of the roof). During the Board of Variance meeting, the applicant also indicated that they were requesting a variance to the building height in order to accommodate a Secondary Suite on the ground floor. It was noted by the Building Department that a Secondary Suite would need to be constructed above the Flood Construction Level for this part of the Hammond Area. Because of the high Flood Construction Level, it would not be possible to construct a Secondary Suite on the ground floor of a new single-family house. Neighbours also indicated their opposition to a Secondary Suite at this location, as they have also not been able to construct a Secondary Suite due to the same issue on their properties. The Planning Department has therefore required the applicant to register a covenant on title that prohibits their ability to construct a Secondary Suite on the property. c) Variance Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for single family development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. The requested variance and rationale for support is described below (see Appendices B and C): 1. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No 7600-2019, Part 6, Section 605, 605.8. 1): To increase the maximum height for a principal building from 8.0 metres to 9.6 metres. 2022-014-VP Page 2 of 3
The proposed variance is supportable as it is consistent with the 11.0 metres (to the top of the roof) that was permitted under the previous Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985. The applicant has submitted house plans that show the height to the top of the roof at 10.67 metres, which would have met the maximum height under the previous Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985. In addition, the applicant has agreed to register a covenant on title that will prevent the development of a Secondary Suite in the new single-family dwelling. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: In accordance with the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, notice of Council consideration of a resolution to issue a Development Variance Permit was mailed to all owners or tenants in occupation of all parcels, any parts of which are adjacent to the property that is subject to the permit. CONCLUSION: The proposed variance is supported because it will allow for the construction of a suitable two-storey house with no Secondary Suite. It is therefore recommended that this application be favourably considered and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Development Variance Permit 2022-014-DVP. "Original signed by Rene Tardif" Prepared by: Rene Tardif, BA, M.PL Planner "Original signed by Mark McMullen" for Reviewed by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Director of Planning "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP GM Planning & Development Services "Original signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Elevation Drawing Showing Proposed Variance Appendix D -Board of Variance Meeting Minutes 2022-014-VP Page 3 of 3
Board of Variance Tuesday, October 5, 2021 4. APPEALS -Board of Variance Minutes CARRIED Page 2 of 5
Board of Variance Tuesday, October 5, 2021 4.2 Amrik Kaurah, Agent For: Ajmer Singh Josan 20451 Westfield Avenue Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 1K8 Property Location: 20425 Hampton Street Lot 320 District Lot 279 New Westminster District Plan 114 The property is currently zoned RS-1 (Single Detached Residential). The applicant is requesting a variance in order to construct a new house with a legal suite. Due to the Flood Construction Level (FCL) requirement they are unable to build a two level house with a crawl space within the 8.0 metre height requirement. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw Section 605.8 (1) states Building Height for Principal Buildings and Principal Structures shall not exceed 8.0 metres. The variance requested is to increase the maximum height permitted from 8.0 metres to 9.6 metres -a variance of 1.6 metres. Discussion: Agent, Amrik Kaurah attended the meeting and stated when they purchased the property, the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw (3510-1985) allowed an 11.0 metre building height and they had drawings drawn up to support this. As of December 2020, a new Zoning Bylaw (7600-2019) was adopted with a maximum height requirement of 8.0 metres. The Agent states this does not allow them enough height to build a two level house in the Hammond Area flood plain. The Recording Secretary advised there were 3 pieces of correspondence received , all against the appeal. The Planner 1 had no concerns but commented that the way the City measure's the height has changed between the old and new Zoning Bylaw, with a functional change of about a 1.5 metres in total. The Manager of Permit Services had no concerns. A board member asked if it was possible to build a 2 level house with a maximum height of 8.0 metres, without a suite? The Manager of Permit Services responded that this site was subdivided prior to the FCL coming into effect and would be exempt from FCL requirements for main floor living, however, a secondary suite is not permitted to be built below the FCL. spoke at the meeting and stated her main opposition is the suite in general as the zoning is sited as an RS-1 and Eltham is a very small and congested road with no options for parking .• further advised that they have struggled with the City to build a secondary suite themselves, and have not been allowed. The Applicant responded that there is the development of 8 new lots coming to Eltham Street. The Board discussed hardship and impact on neighbourhood. It was moved and seconded That the appeal to increase the maximum building height to accommodate a proposed new house, from 8.0 to 9.6 metres -a variance of 1.6 metres, for the property at 20425 Hampton Street, be allowed. DEFEATED Ryan Carpenter, Tamara Leginus and Lillian Kan -OPPOSED Board of Variance Minutes Page 3 of 5
Board of Variance Tuesday, October 5, 2021 Board of Variance Minutes Page 4 of 5
Board of Variance Tuesday, October 5, 2021 5. NEW BUSINESS -The Board voted unanimously to appoint Ryan Carpenter as Acting Chair. 6. ADJOURNMENT -9:50 a.m. Certified Correct: Robert Whitlock, Chair Board of Variance Minutes Page 5 of 5
1131
The City of Maple Ridge is currently signed onto the existing Regional Mutual Aid Agreement dated February 8, 2000; however, not all jurisdictions were party to the 2000 agreement, including Anmore, Belcarra, Bowen Island, Tswwassen First Nations, Lions Bay and UBC Endowment Lands. Given the recent atmospheric river events, the Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement has been updated to include these local governments and provide some minor language improvements. The improvements include an opportunity for responding authorities to include a 10% mark-up on costs; a broader definition of emergent situations outside of Public Works to include incidents such as cyber attacks, and further indemnification through inclusion of a "good Samaritan" clause. The following principles guide the agreement: 1. Voluntary support base on each jurisdiction's situation 2. Approach neighbouring jurisdictions first 3. Responders take direction from requesters 4. Costs will be based on responders "rates of the day" plus a 10% mark up 5. All parties are expected to maintain sufficient insurance 6. Low maintenance agreement -no rates, no contact lists 7. Provision for Joinder Agreements Staff have reviewed the agreement and support endorsement. It is worth noting that the Fire Department is party to mutual aid agreements with neighbouring municipalities outside of this agreement. b) Strategic Alignment: The ability to request and respond to Public Works mutual aid requests across the Region aligns with the City's community safety and inter-government relations strategic priorities. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Citizens/customers may benefit from the availability of additional resources during an event beyond the City's capabilities to respond to. d) Interdepartmental Implications: This agreement pertains to any work or property under the management or control of the Local Authority or Regional Authority, including but not limited to drinking water, wastewater, waste management services, transportation systems and networks and computer systems. Doc#3018387 Page 2 of 3
ATTACHMENT 1 Execution Version REGIONAL PUBLIC WORKS MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT This Agreement is made as of the __ day of ______ 2022, AMONG: 1) Village of Anmore 2) Village of Belcarra 3) Bowen Island Municipality 4) City of Burnaby 5) City of Coquitlam 6) City of Delta 7) City of Langley 8) Township of Langley 9) Village of Lions Bay 10) City of Maple Ridge 11) City of New Westminster 12) City of North Vancouver 13) District of North Vancouver 14) City of Pitt Meadows 15) City of Port Coquitlam 16) City of Port Moody 17) City of Richmond 18) City of Surrey 19) Tsawwassen First Nation 20) City of Vancouver 21) District of West Vancouver 22) City of White Rock 23) Metro Vancouver Regional District (as t~. Electoral Area A) 24) Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District 25) Greater Vancouver Water District 26) Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia, as represented by the Minister of Municipal Affairs (as to the University Endowment Land) 27) University of British Columbia WHEREAS: A. Capitalized terms used in these recitals and this Agreement have the meanings ascribed to them in Section 1.0; B. The local government councils and board of the Metro Vancouver Regional District (with respect to Electoral Area A) are "local authorities" within the meaning of the Emergency Program Act, [RSBC 1996) Chapter 111; C. Local Authorities are required under the Local Authority Emergency Management Regulation [B.C. Reg. 380/95] to identify the procedures by which emergency resources, including personnel, equipment and facilities may be obtained from sources within or outside of the jurisdictional area Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 1 of 21
Execution Version for which the local Authority has responsibility; D. A Major Emergency affecting one or more local Authorities or Regional Authorities is likely to affect the Metro Vancouver region as a whole and as such, the Parties agree that it is in the best interests for the Parties to implement a coordinated and supportive response; E. Pursuant to the Local Authority Emergency Management Regulation [BC Reg. 380/95), a Local Authority may enter into mutual aid agreements for Resources and subsequent cost recovery outside of the jurisdictional area for which the Local Authority has responsibility; F. Pursuant to the Local Government Act [RSBC 2015, Chapter 1), a board of a regional district has the statutory authority to enter into mutual aid agreements with a Local Authority; G. Pursuant to the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Act [SBC 1956, Chapter 59] and the Greater Vancouver Water District Act [SBC 1924, Chapter 22], the GVS&DD and the GVWD, respectively, have the statutory authority to enter into mutual aid agreements with Local Authorities; H. Pursuant to the University Endowment Land Act [RSBC 1996 Ch. 469), the Minister of Municipal Affairs has the authority to enter into agreements respecting the administration of the University Endowment Land; I. Pursuant to the University Act [RSBC 1996 Ch. 468], the Board of Governors of the University of British Columbia has the authority to enter into agreements on behalf of the university; and J. The Parties desire to enter into this Agreement for the purposes of providing for mutual support, aid and assistance to, among other things, ensure that Public Works are maintained in the event of a Major Emergency. NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the premises and of the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, each of the above signing Parties hereto covenant and agree with each other as follows: 1.0 Definitions In this Agreement, unless something in the subject matter or context is inconsistent therewith, the capitalized terms herein will have the meanings set out below: (a} "Agreement" means this agreement and includes all recitals and schedules to this agreement; (b) ((Authorized Representative" means the representative of the Local Authority or Regional Authority authorized by the municipal council, regional board, Minister of Municipal Affairs or Board of Governors of the University of British Columbia, as applicable, to coordinate, allocate, and prioritize assistance under the terms of this Agreement. (c} "Computer System" means any computer, hardware, software, communications system, electronic device, server, cloud, or microcontroller, including similar system or any configuration of the aforementioned and including any associated input, output, data Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 2 of 21
Execution Version storage device, networking equipment or back up facility. (d) "Cyber Attack11 means an attempt to disrupt, disable, destroy or maliciously control a Computer System and includes, without limitation, an attempt to destroy the integrity of data or to steal controlled information. (e) "Disaster" means a calamity that: (i) is caused by accident, fire, explosion or technical failure or by the forces of nature; and (ii) has resulted in serious harm to the health, safety or welfare of people, or in widespread damage to property. (f) "Effective Date" has the meaning given in Section 9.1; (g) "Emergency'' means a present or imminent event or circumstance that: (i) is caused by accident, fire, explosion, pandemic, technical failure or the forces of nature; and (ii) requires prompt coordination of action or special regulation of persons or property to protect the health, safety or welfare of a person or to limit damage to property. (h) "GVS&DD" means the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District; (i) "GVWD" means the Greater Vancouver Water District; (j) "Joinder Agreement'' means an agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Schedule "A11, pursuant to which a New Party agrees to join and be bound by the terms of this Agreement; (k) "Local Authority" means: (i) for a municipality, the municipal council; and (ii) for an electoral area in a regional district, the board of the regional district; and for the purposes of this Agreement includes the following parties who are not are "local authorities" within the meaning of the Emergency Program Act, [RSBC 1996] Chapter 111: {iii) for the University Endowment Lands, the Minister of Municipal Affairs; and (iv) for the University of British Columbia, its Board of Governors. (I) "Major Emergency11 means an Emergency, Disaster or Other Serious Incident that involves one or more Local Authorities or Regional Authorities and requires resources beyond the capability of one or more of the Local Authorities or Regional Authorities Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 3 of 21
Execution Version involved. {m) "New Party11 has the meaning given in Section 9.3 below. {n) "Other Serious lncident11 means any sudden, unexpected, or unintended incident, other than a Disaster or Emergency, and including a Cyber Attack, for which a Local Authority or Regional Authority may require assistance to protect the health, safety or welfare of a person or to limit damage to Public Works or other property. {o) "Parties11 means those parties who have signed this Agreement or a Joinder Agreement, and "Party11 means any one of them. (p) "Public Works11 means any work or property under the management or control of the Local Authority or Regional Authority, including but not limited drinking water, wastewater waste management services, transportation systems and networks and Computer Systems. (q) "Regional Authority11 means the Board of the GVS&DD or the Board of the GVWD. (r) "Requesting Authority11 means a Requesting Local Authority or Requesting Regional Authority, as the case may be. (s) "Requesting Authority's Personnel11 includes any elected officials, officers, employees or affiliated volunteers of a Requesting Authority. (t) "Requesting Local Authority11 means a Local Authority under a Major Emergency situation that has, pursuant to this Agreement, requested assistance from another Local Authority or Regional Authority. (u) "Requesting Regional Authority" means a Regional Authority under a Major Emergency situation that has, pursuant to this Agreement, requested assistance from another Local Authority or Regional Authority. (v) "Resources11 means a Local Authority's personnel, equipment, facilities, services and materials that are available or potentially available for utilization to ensure that Public Works are maintained. (w) "Responding Authority" means a Responding Local Authority or Responding Regional Authority, as the case may be. (x) "Responding Authority's Personnel" includes any elected officials, officers, employees or affiliated volunteers of a Responding Authority. (y) "Responding Local Authority" means a Local Authority that provides Resources to a Requesting Authority that has, pursuant to this Agreement, requested assistance to confront a Major Emergency. {z) "Responding Regional Authority" means a Regional Authority that provides Resources to a Requesting Authority that has, pursuant to this Agreement, requested assistance to Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 4 of 21
Execution Version confront a Major Emergency. (aa) "Standby Expenses" means compensation paid or owing to an employee not scheduled for normal work but who is required to be immediately available for call-in work. 2.0 Intent of the Agreement 2.1 This Agreement is intended to guide the sharing of Resources amongst Local Authorities and Regional Authorities when assistance has been requested during Major Emergency situations for which the sharing of Resources is required. 2.2 Resources are intended to be available in the event of a Major Emergency of such magnitude that it is, or is likely to be, beyond the capability of a single Local Authority or Regional Authority and requires the combined Resources of several or all of the Local Authorities and Regional Authorities to this Agreement. 3.0 Scope of the Agreement 3.1 Except as set out in Section 12.1 below, this Agreement shall not supplant, without mutual consent, existing agreements between the Parties for the exchange or provision of Resources on a reimbursable, exchange, or other basis. 3.2 Any activation of this Agreement under Section 4.0 will clearly state that the request for Resources is being made under this Agreement. 4.0 Activation 4.1 In the event of a Major Emergency, the Authorized Representative designated by the Requesting Authority may activate this Agreement by making a request for Resources to the Authorized Representative of one or more Parties to this Agreement. 4.2 If the Requesting Authority is a Local Authority, such Requesting Local Authority shall first request Resources from their bordering Local Authorities, before requesting Resources from more distant Local Authorities or from Regional Authorities. 4.3 If the Requesting Authority is a Regional Authority, the Requesting Regional Authority shall first request Resources from those Local Authorities adjacent to the location of the Major Emergency before requesting Resources from more distant Local Authorities. 4.4 Sections 4.2 and 4.3 shall not restrict a Requesting Authority from accepting the first available Resources from any Local Authority. 5.0 Resource Requests and Inventory 5.1 Each Party agrees that, in the event of a Major Emergency, it will, upon receipt of a written request from a Requesting Party, furnish such Resources as are available, provided that doing so would not unreasonably diminish the capacity of the Responding Authority to provide any required Resources to its own jurisdictional area. For certainty, the extent of the assistance given will be at the discretion of the Authorized Representative of the Responding Authority, having regard to Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 5 of 21
Execution Version its own local needs and situation at the time. 5.2 The start date of the provision of Resources will be the date agreed to in writing by both the Requesting Authority and Responding Authority. The termination date for the provision of Resources will be determined by the Responding Authority and shall not exceed the end time of the Major Emergency, as agreed by the Responding Authority and Requesting Authority. 5.3 During a Major Emergency, all personnel from a Responding Authority shall report to and work under the direction of the Party within whose jurisdiction the Major Emergency is occurring, in cooperation with the Requesting Authority and any other Responding Authorities. 5.4 Each Party should maintain an inventory of Resources that may be made available in the event of a Major Emergency and share that inventory with its neighbouring Local Authorities and Regional Authorities. 5.5 If a request for Resources is made pursuant to this Agreement, the Requesting Party will, as necessary, make available to the Responding Authority: (a) maps of its jurisdiction indicating the nearest and most suitable roads to enable responders to get to an emergency as quickly as possible, together with locations of water supplies and access thereto; (b) applicable operating guidelines and communications protocols; (c) a copy of the Requesting Authority's emergency plan; and (d) names and contact information for the Requesting Authority's key personnel. 6.0 Reimbursement 6.1 The Requesting Authority will reimburse the Responding Authority for any actual costs incurred providing any Resources requested under this Agreement, plus a sum equal to 10% of those costs and expenses on account of the Responding Authority1s overhead. 6.2 Without limiting the generality of Section 6.1, a Requesting Authority shall pay to the Responding Authority: (a) Regular Time -Salaries, wages and other regular time employment expenses (including benefits and statutory deductions) of employees or affiliated volunteers, at the current prevailing rates of the Responding Authority. (b) Overtime and Standby Expenses -Overtime employment expenses and Standby Expenses of employees or affiliated volunteers, at the current prevailing rates of the Responding Authority. There is no compensation for banked time of employees. (c) Supplies and Materials -Value of supplies or other materials which are not returnable to the Responding Authority. All charges will be at current market rates or at rates otherwise agreed to. Supplies or materials may be replaced with like supplies or materials, if agreed to by the Responding Authority. Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 6 of 21
Execution Version (d) Equipment -Compensation for the use of equipment, vehicles, computers, or other hardware owned outright by the Responding Authority. Equipment reimbursement rates shall be at a rate agreed to by the Requesting Authority and Responding Authority for vehicles or other equipment. If a rate cannot be agreed, the rate will at the British Columbia standard for equipment reimbursement, as represented by the Blue Book-BC Equipment Rental Rate Guide. The Requesting Authority shall be responsible for the operating costs of equipment provided, including costs of repairs required as a result of the Requesting Authority's use, while In its possession. For certainty, a Requesting Authority is not responsible for the costs of equipment repairs that would have been undertaken by the Responding Authority as a matter of routine repair or maintenance. (e) Facilities -Compensation for the use of Responding Authority facilities. Reimbursement rates will be at the prevailing rate on the day the facility is rented, leased or otherwise made available to the Requesting Authority. 6.3 The Requesting Authority's obligation to reimburse the Responding Authority pursuant to this Agreement is irrespective of the Requesting Authority's entitlement to compensation or funding received from Emergency Management BC or any other funding agencies. Accordingly, the Requesting Authority will be responsible for any shortfall in any amounts payable by the Requesting Authority pursuant to this Agreement and any cost recovery by the Requesting Authority from Emergency Management BC or other funding agency. 6.4 The Requesting Authority shall be responsible for any loss or damage to Resources used in the response and shall pay any expense incurred in the operation and maintenance thereof, as well as any expense incurred in the provision of a service or other expense in answering the request for assistance from the Requesting Authority; An itemized claim for loss and damage to the Responding Authority's equipment at the response scene shall be filed within thirty {30) days of such loss or damage occurring. 6.5 All Resources noted in Subsections 6.2(d) and (e) provided to a Requesting Authority shall be returned in the same condition as when such Reso"urces were delivered to the Requesting Authority. These Resources shall be deemed to be provided in good working order, unless otherwise noted by the Responding Authority at the time of delivery. 6.6 The Requesting Authority will arrange for and pay for all costs associated with any necessary repairs or restoration of Resources prior to returning such Resources to the Responding Authority. For certainty, a Requesting Authority is not responsible for the costs of repairs or restoration that would have been undertaken by the Responding Authority as a matter of routine repair or maintenance. 6.7 The Responding Authority will invoice the Requesting Authority detailing all costs incurred in providing Resources under this Agreement, including all overhead amounts referred to in Section 6.1. Payment of such invoices by the Requesting Authority is due in full sixty (60) days from the date of invoice, unless alternate arrangements have been made between the Requesting Authority and Responding Authority or the invoice is in dispute, as contemplated in Section 6.9. 6.8 Payment by the Requesting Authority will be by cheque mailed to the Responding Authority's address, as detailed in the invoice, or if the Responding Authority and Requesting Authority mutually agree, payment may be transferred electronically to the Responding Authorities' bank Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 7 of 21
Execution Version account, as stipulated by the Responding Authority. 6.9 If a dispute ensues with respect to an invoice issued by a Responding Authority pursuant to Section 6.7, the Parties to the dispute will use best efforts to resolve the dispute as soon as possible in accordance with the dispute resolution process provided in Section 10.0. 6.10 The Parties acknowledge and agree that they are each individually responsible for staying apprised of the financial guidelines and eligibility requirements of Emergency Management BC and any other funding agencies related to potential cost recovery that may be available from such agencies in respect of any Resources provided under this Agreement. 7 .O Insurance, Liability and Indemnity 7.1 The Parties agree to obtain and maintain sufficient insurance to meet any obligations or liabilities that may arise in connection with this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties acknowledge and agrees that they each may self-insure part or all of the risks, subject always to equivalent terms and conditions as though such policies were obtained from licensed commercial insurers. 7.2 Any required insurance coverage pursuant to this Agreement will be arranged prior to the acceptance of the request for Resources under this Agreement. 7.3 When rendering aid outside their jurisdictional area, all personnel and affiliated volunteers will retain the same powers, duties, rights, privileges and immunities, including any coverage under the Worker's Compensation Act that they receive when they are on duty in their home jurisdiction. 7.4 A Requesting Authority shall pay to the Responding Authority: (a) the Workers' Compensation, death or disability benefits or any other form of compensation (including judgements, damages, costs, penalties and expenses) which the Responding Authority is legally obligated to pay to one of its employees or affiliated volunteers or the family or beneficiaries of such employees or volunteers by reason ofthe death or injury to an employee or volunteer while working on a Major Emergency on behalf of the Requesting Authority; and (b} all legal fees and disbursements incurred· by the Responding Authority to defend any demands, claims, suits or actions arising from, related to or caused by any death or injury to an employee or volunteer while working on a Major Emergency on behalf of the Requesting Authority. 7.5 The Requesting Authority shall in no way be deemed liable or responsible for the personal property of Responding Authority Personnel which may be lost, stolen, or damaged while performing their duties in responding under the terms of this Agreement. 7.6 No Party to this Agreement shall be liable in damages to another Party, nor to the owner of property within the geographic jurisdiction of the Requesting Authority or another Party for failing to respond to a request for assistance under this Agreement or for failing to render adequate assistance. Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 8 of 21
Execution Version 8.3 The master copy of this Agreement, together with any Joinder Agreements, will be held by the Metro Vancouver Regional District and will be made available electronically to all Parties upon request. 9.0 Effective Date, Term and Addition of Parties 9.1 This Agreement shall come into effect as soon as it has been executed by two Parties {the (/Effective Date"), 9.2 Any one of the Parties hereto may withdraw from this Agreement by giving not less than thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other Parties, following which the Agreement shall continue in force between the remaining Parties. 9.3 A Governmental Authority may be added as a new party (a (/New Party") to this Agreement if such New Party executes and delivers to the Metro Vancouver Regional District a Joinder Agreement substantially in the form of Schedule (IA" attached hereto. (/Governmental Authority" means any federal, provincial, regional, municipal, local or other government, governmental or public department, authority, commission, council, board, bureau or agency. 10.0 Dispute Resolution 10.1 In the event of any dispute or material disagreement among two or more Parties regarding the interpretation or application of any provision of this Agreement, the Parties agree that: (a} the Parties, through their Authorized Representatives, will, in good faith, make all reasonable efforts to resolve the dispute by negotiation, during which time each Party will disclose to the other Party all relevant information relating to the dispute; (b) if the dispute remains unresolved, the Parties will meet with a qualified mediator in a timely manner and attempt, in good faith, to further negotiate a resolution of such dispute; and (c) if the mediator cannot resolve the dispute within 48 hours, then the dispute will, unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, either: (i) be resolved in accordance with Division 3 of Part 9 of the Community Charter, [SBC 2003] Chapter 26; or (ii) for any dispute involving a Party to which Division 3 of Part 9 of the Community Charter, [SBC 2003] Chapter 26 does not apply, be submitted to final and binding arbitration by a sole arbitrator appointed pursuant to the Arbitration Act (British Columbia). 11.0 Approvals 11.1 The Parties signify their approval of this Agreement by the signatures of their respective authorized representatives below. Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 10 of 21
Execution Version 12.0 General Provisions 12.1 Schedules. Schedule "A" is attached to and forms part of this Agreement. 12.2 Interpretation. (a) The words 11include11, 11includes" and "including11 as used in this Agreement shall be deemed to be followed by the phrase ", without limitation,". (b) The captions and headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and do not define or in any way limit or enlarge the scope or intent of any provision of this Agreement. 12.3 Survival of Obligations. All of the obligations of the Parties which expressly or by their nature survive termination or expiration of this Agreement, will continue in full force and effect subsequent to and notwithstanding such termination or expiration and until they are satisfied or by their nature expire. 12.4 Amendment. No amendment of this Agreement will be binding unless made in writing and executed by each of the Parties hereto. 12.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement amongst the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and for certainty this Agreement supersedes the "Mutual Aid Agreement for Public Works Assistance" that was prepared by the Metro Vancouver Regional Engineers Advisory Committee in 2000 and entered into by participating Local Authorities. 12.6 Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Agreement will be governed exclusively in accordance with the laws of British Columbia and the laws of Canada applicable in British Columbia which will be deemed to be the proper law of this Agreement. 12.7 Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable and if any provision is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal or invalid or unenforceable for any reason whatsoever, such provision shall be severed from this Agreement and will not affect the legality or enforceability of the remainder of any other provision of this Agreement. 12.8 Time of Essence. Time shall be of the essence of this Agreement. 12.9 No Derogation. The Parties acknowledge and agree that nothing contained or implied in this Agreement will be construed as limiting or prejudicing the rights and powers of any Party in the exercise of their respective functions pursuant to the Local Government Act, the Community Charter, the Vancouver Charter and the Emergency Program Act, as the case may be, or any other right or power under any public or private statutes, bylaws, orders or regulations, all of which may be fully exercised as if this Agreement had not been entered into. 12.10 Assignment. This Agreement shall not be assignable. Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 11 of 21
Execution Version 12.11 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and returned by email with a PDF attachment, each of which when executed and delivered shall constitute an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed and delivered by the Parties as of the day and year first above written. Village of Anmore Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Village of Belcarra Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Bowen Island Municipality Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 12 of 21
City of Burnaby Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory City of Coquitlam Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory City of Delta Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Execution Version Page 13 of 21
City of Langley Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Township of Langley Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Village of Lions Bay Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Execution Version Page 14 of 21
City of Maple Ridge Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory City of New Westminster Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory City of North Vancouver Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Execution Version Page 15 of 21
District of North Vancouver Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory City of Pitt Meadows Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory City of Port Coquitlam Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Execution Version Page 16 of 21
City of Port Moody Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory City of Richmond Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory City of Surrey Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Execution Version Page 17 of 21
Tsawwassen First Nation Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory City of Vancouver Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory District of West Vancouver Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Execution Version Page 18 of 21
City of White Rock Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Metro Vancouver Regional District Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Greater Vancouver Sewer and Drainage District Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Execution Version Page 19 of 21
Execution Version Greater Vancouver Water District Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia, as represented by the Minister of Municipal Affairs Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory University of British Columbia Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 20 of 21
Execution Version SCHEDULE "A" JOINDER AGREEMENT This Joinder Agreement is made as of the __ day of ___ _ Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 9.3 of the Regional Mutual Agreement for Major Emergencies made as of the_ day of (the "Mutual Aid Agreement'1) [insert name of new party joining the Agreement] hereby acknowledges and agrees that [insert name of new party joining the Agreement] has received and reviewed a complete copy of the Mutual Aid Agreement and shall be fully bound by, and subject to, all of the terms and conditions ofthe Mutual Aid Agreement as though it were an original party thereto. [insert name of new party] Per: Authorized Signatory Per: Authorized Signatory Regional Public Works Mutual Aid Agreement 50672995 Page 21 of 21