Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-07-23 Regular Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfCity of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA July 23, 2024 7:00 pm Virtual Online Meeting including Council Chambers The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council using bylaws or resolutions. This is the venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution.The meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge. This Agenda is posted on the City’s Public Portal at:  https://mapleridge.primegov.com/public/portal For virtual public participation during Public Question Period register by going to Public Portal at: https://mapleridge.primegov.com/public/portal and clicking on the microphone icon for the select meeting 1.CALL TO ORDER 1.1 Territory Acknowledgement The City of Maple Ridge carries out its business on the traditional and unceded territories of the Katzie (q̓ic̓әy̓) First Nation and the Kwantlen (qʼʷa:n̓ƛʼәn̓) First Nation. 2.AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA 3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4.ADOPTION OF MINUTES 4.1 Minutes  – Special (to Close) Meeting – July 9, 2024  – Regular Council Meeting – July 9, 2024  – Report of Public Hearing – July 16, 2024 5.PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 6.DELEGATIONS 6.1 Ridge Meadows Burrards Lacrosse – U11B Allstar Team ­ 2024 Jack Crosby Tournament Tier 3 Division Champions Presentation from Sasha Passaglia, Ridge Meadows Burrards Lacrosse 7.CONSENT AGENDA RECOMMENDATION: That the following items on the July 23, 2024, Regular Council Consent Agenda be received into record. 7.1 Disbursements for the month ended June 30, 2024 Staff report dated July 23, 2024, disbursements summary for the month ended June 30, 2024. 7.2 2024 Council Expenses Staff report dated July 23, 2024, Council expenses recorded to June 30, 2024. 8.UNFINISHED BUSINESS 9.BYLAWS  9.1 2021­352­RZ, 23613 132 Avenue, RS­2 to RM­1 To permit the future construction of 18 townhomes. RECOMMENDATION: 1.    That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7787­2021 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2.    That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i)    Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii)    Road dedication at the intersection of 132 Avenue and 236 Street as required by design; iii)    Consolidation of the subject properties; iv)    Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; v)    Removal of existing building(s); vi)    In addition to the Ministry of Environment Site Disclosure Statement, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site. vii)    That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $133,200.00 ($7,400.00/unit), or such rate applicable at third reading of this application, be provided in keeping with the Council Policy 6.31 with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. 9.2 2016­195­CP, Employment Lands: Re­designation of the Yennadon Lands to Industrial (Employment Park Category), Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734­2021 (Policy) and 7735­2021 (Land Use Designation) To implement the Yennadon Lands Concept Plan into the Official Community Plan for a future boutique employment park. RECOMMENDATION: That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734­2021 be adopted; and That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735­2021 be adopted. 10. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The items in the “Committee Reports and Recommendations” category are staff reports presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting, typically a week prior, to provide Council with an opportunity to ask staff detailed questions. The items are now before the Regular Council meeting for debate and vote. Both meetings are open to the public. 10.1 Demolition Requirement In­Stream Rezoning Applications To remove the requirement to demolish existing dwellings prior to rezoning adoption of in­stream applications. RECOMMENDATION: That Council authorize the Director of Planning to waive the rezoning requirement for removing existing dwellings before the adoption of the rezoning bylaw for the 16 in­stream applications, as of July 2, 2024, affected by the SSMUH legislation, except in cases where the subject property is actively violating bylaws or is deemed unsightly or a nuisance. 10.2 2024­155­VP, 11300 Pazarena Place,  Development Variance Permit To increase the fence height for a daycare play area associated with the commercial/residential building nearing completion. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2024­155­VP respecting property located at 11300 Pazarena Place. 10.3 Urban Forest Management Strategy – Final The Urban Forest Management Strategy has been developed using input from staff, Council and community engagement. The Urban Forest Management System consists of 4 key goals, 10 strategies, and 59 detailed action items to achieve the target of a 40% tree canopy coverage within the urban area by 2045. RECOMMENDATION: That the Urban Forest Management Strategy be endorsed in principle. 10.4 The Patch Brewery Liquor License Lounge Endorsement Application for a brewery lounge endorsement as an amendment to the existing manufacturer's license to allow onsite alcohol sales and consumption from 9:00 am to 10:00 pm Monday to Sunday. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the application for a brewery lounge endorsement, as an amendment to their manufacturer license, by The Patch Brewery Inc. located at 12745 Laity Street, Maple Ridge, be supported based on the information contained in the Council report dated July 16, 2024. 2. That a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch in accordance with the legislative requirements. 11.STAFF REPORTS 11.1 2024 Strategic Work Plan – Quarterly Report Q2 2024 Staff report dated July 23, 2024, providing an overview of initiatives being implemented to advance Council’s Strategic Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That Council receive the Quarterly Report­Q2 2024 for information. 12.OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 13.PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD 14.MAYOR AND COUNCILLOR VERBAL REPORTS 15.NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING 16.ADJOURNMENT City of Maple RidgeCOUNCIL MEETING AGENDAJuly 23, 20247:00 pmVirtual Online Meeting including Council ChambersThe purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council using bylaws or resolutions. This isthe venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution.The meeting is live streamed andrecorded by the City of Maple Ridge. This Agenda is posted on the City’s Public Portal at: https://mapleridge.primegov.com/public/portalFor virtual public participation during Public Question Period register by going toPublic Portal at: https://mapleridge.primegov.com/public/portal and clicking on themicrophone icon for the select meeting1.CALL TO ORDER1.1 Territory AcknowledgementThe City of Maple Ridge carries out its business on the traditional andunceded territories of the Katzie (q̓ic̓әy̓) First Nation and the Kwantlen(qʼʷa:n̓ƛʼәn̓) First Nation.2.AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA4.ADOPTION OF MINUTES4.1 Minutes – Special (to Close) Meeting – July 9, 2024  – Regular Council Meeting – July 9, 2024  – Report of Public Hearing – July 16, 2024 5.PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 6.DELEGATIONS 6.1 Ridge Meadows Burrards Lacrosse – U11B Allstar Team ­ 2024 Jack Crosby Tournament Tier 3 Division Champions Presentation from Sasha Passaglia, Ridge Meadows Burrards Lacrosse 7.CONSENT AGENDA RECOMMENDATION: That the following items on the July 23, 2024, Regular Council Consent Agenda be received into record. 7.1 Disbursements for the month ended June 30, 2024 Staff report dated July 23, 2024, disbursements summary for the month ended June 30, 2024. 7.2 2024 Council Expenses Staff report dated July 23, 2024, Council expenses recorded to June 30, 2024. 8.UNFINISHED BUSINESS 9.BYLAWS  9.1 2021­352­RZ, 23613 132 Avenue, RS­2 to RM­1 To permit the future construction of 18 townhomes. RECOMMENDATION: 1.    That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7787­2021 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2.    That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i)    Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii)    Road dedication at the intersection of 132 Avenue and 236 Street as required by design; iii)    Consolidation of the subject properties; iv)    Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; v)    Removal of existing building(s); vi)    In addition to the Ministry of Environment Site Disclosure Statement, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site. vii)    That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $133,200.00 ($7,400.00/unit), or such rate applicable at third reading of this application, be provided in keeping with the Council Policy 6.31 with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. 9.2 2016­195­CP, Employment Lands: Re­designation of the Yennadon Lands to Industrial (Employment Park Category), Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734­2021 (Policy) and 7735­2021 (Land Use Designation) To implement the Yennadon Lands Concept Plan into the Official Community Plan for a future boutique employment park. RECOMMENDATION: That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734­2021 be adopted; and That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735­2021 be adopted. 10. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The items in the “Committee Reports and Recommendations” category are staff reports presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting, typically a week prior, to provide Council with an opportunity to ask staff detailed questions. The items are now before the Regular Council meeting for debate and vote. Both meetings are open to the public. 10.1 Demolition Requirement In­Stream Rezoning Applications To remove the requirement to demolish existing dwellings prior to rezoning adoption of in­stream applications. RECOMMENDATION: That Council authorize the Director of Planning to waive the rezoning requirement for removing existing dwellings before the adoption of the rezoning bylaw for the 16 in­stream applications, as of July 2, 2024, affected by the SSMUH legislation, except in cases where the subject property is actively violating bylaws or is deemed unsightly or a nuisance. 10.2 2024­155­VP, 11300 Pazarena Place,  Development Variance Permit To increase the fence height for a daycare play area associated with the commercial/residential building nearing completion. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2024­155­VP respecting property located at 11300 Pazarena Place. 10.3 Urban Forest Management Strategy – Final The Urban Forest Management Strategy has been developed using input from staff, Council and community engagement. The Urban Forest Management System consists of 4 key goals, 10 strategies, and 59 detailed action items to achieve the target of a 40% tree canopy coverage within the urban area by 2045. RECOMMENDATION: That the Urban Forest Management Strategy be endorsed in principle. 10.4 The Patch Brewery Liquor License Lounge Endorsement Application for a brewery lounge endorsement as an amendment to the existing manufacturer's license to allow onsite alcohol sales and consumption from 9:00 am to 10:00 pm Monday to Sunday. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the application for a brewery lounge endorsement, as an amendment to their manufacturer license, by The Patch Brewery Inc. located at 12745 Laity Street, Maple Ridge, be supported based on the information contained in the Council report dated July 16, 2024. 2. That a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch in accordance with the legislative requirements. 11.STAFF REPORTS 11.1 2024 Strategic Work Plan – Quarterly Report Q2 2024 Staff report dated July 23, 2024, providing an overview of initiatives being implemented to advance Council’s Strategic Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That Council receive the Quarterly Report­Q2 2024 for information. 12.OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 13.PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD 14.MAYOR AND COUNCILLOR VERBAL REPORTS 15.NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING 16.ADJOURNMENT City of Maple RidgeCOUNCIL MEETING AGENDAJuly 23, 20247:00 pmVirtual Online Meeting including Council ChambersThe purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council using bylaws or resolutions. This isthe venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution.The meeting is live streamed andrecorded by the City of Maple Ridge. This Agenda is posted on the City’s Public Portal at: https://mapleridge.primegov.com/public/portalFor virtual public participation during Public Question Period register by going toPublic Portal at: https://mapleridge.primegov.com/public/portal and clicking on themicrophone icon for the select meeting1.CALL TO ORDER1.1 Territory AcknowledgementThe City of Maple Ridge carries out its business on the traditional andunceded territories of the Katzie (q̓ic̓әy̓) First Nation and the Kwantlen(qʼʷa:n̓ƛʼәn̓) First Nation.2.AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA4.ADOPTION OF MINUTES4.1 Minutes – Special (to Close) Meeting – July 9, 2024 – Regular Council Meeting – July 9, 2024 – Report of Public Hearing – July 16, 20245.PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL6.DELEGATIONS6.1 Ridge Meadows Burrards Lacrosse – U11B Allstar Team ­ 2024 Jack CrosbyTournament Tier 3 Division ChampionsPresentation from Sasha Passaglia, Ridge Meadows Burrards Lacrosse7.CONSENT AGENDARECOMMENDATION: That the following items on the July 23, 2024,Regular Council Consent Agenda be received into record.7.1 Disbursements for the month ended June 30, 2024Staff report dated July 23, 2024, disbursements summary for the month endedJune 30, 2024.7.2 2024 Council ExpensesStaff report dated July 23, 2024, Council expenses recorded to June 30, 2024.8.UNFINISHED BUSINESS9.BYLAWS 9.1 2021­352­RZ, 23613 132 Avenue, RS­2 to RM­1To permit the future construction of 18 townhomes.RECOMMENDATION:1.    That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7787­2021 be given second reading, and beforwarded to Public Hearing;2.    That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:i)    Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenantand receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;ii)    Road dedication at the intersection of 132 Avenue and 236 Street as requiredby design;iii)    Consolidation of the subject properties;iv)    Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, whichaddresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; v)    Removal of existing building(s); vi)    In addition to the Ministry of Environment Site Disclosure Statement, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site. vii)    That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $133,200.00 ($7,400.00/unit), or such rate applicable at third reading of this application, be provided in keeping with the Council Policy 6.31 with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. 9.2 2016­195­CP, Employment Lands: Re­designation of the Yennadon Lands to Industrial (Employment Park Category), Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734­2021 (Policy) and 7735­2021 (Land Use Designation) To implement the Yennadon Lands Concept Plan into the Official Community Plan for a future boutique employment park. RECOMMENDATION: That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734­2021 be adopted; and That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735­2021 be adopted. 10. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The items in the “Committee Reports and Recommendations” category are staff reports presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting, typically a week prior, to provide Council with an opportunity to ask staff detailed questions. The items are now before the Regular Council meeting for debate and vote. Both meetings are open to the public. 10.1 Demolition Requirement In­Stream Rezoning Applications To remove the requirement to demolish existing dwellings prior to rezoning adoption of in­stream applications. RECOMMENDATION: That Council authorize the Director of Planning to waive the rezoning requirement for removing existing dwellings before the adoption of the rezoning bylaw for the 16 in­stream applications, as of July 2, 2024, affected by the SSMUH legislation, except in cases where the subject property is actively violating bylaws or is deemed unsightly or a nuisance. 10.2 2024­155­VP, 11300 Pazarena Place,  Development Variance Permit To increase the fence height for a daycare play area associated with the commercial/residential building nearing completion. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2024­155­VP respecting property located at 11300 Pazarena Place. 10.3 Urban Forest Management Strategy – Final The Urban Forest Management Strategy has been developed using input from staff, Council and community engagement. The Urban Forest Management System consists of 4 key goals, 10 strategies, and 59 detailed action items to achieve the target of a 40% tree canopy coverage within the urban area by 2045. RECOMMENDATION: That the Urban Forest Management Strategy be endorsed in principle. 10.4 The Patch Brewery Liquor License Lounge Endorsement Application for a brewery lounge endorsement as an amendment to the existing manufacturer's license to allow onsite alcohol sales and consumption from 9:00 am to 10:00 pm Monday to Sunday. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the application for a brewery lounge endorsement, as an amendment to their manufacturer license, by The Patch Brewery Inc. located at 12745 Laity Street, Maple Ridge, be supported based on the information contained in the Council report dated July 16, 2024. 2. That a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch in accordance with the legislative requirements. 11.STAFF REPORTS 11.1 2024 Strategic Work Plan – Quarterly Report Q2 2024 Staff report dated July 23, 2024, providing an overview of initiatives being implemented to advance Council’s Strategic Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That Council receive the Quarterly Report­Q2 2024 for information. 12.OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 13.PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD 14.MAYOR AND COUNCILLOR VERBAL REPORTS 15.NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING 16.ADJOURNMENT City of Maple RidgeCOUNCIL MEETING AGENDAJuly 23, 20247:00 pmVirtual Online Meeting including Council ChambersThe purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council using bylaws or resolutions. This isthe venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution.The meeting is live streamed andrecorded by the City of Maple Ridge. This Agenda is posted on the City’s Public Portal at: https://mapleridge.primegov.com/public/portalFor virtual public participation during Public Question Period register by going toPublic Portal at: https://mapleridge.primegov.com/public/portal and clicking on themicrophone icon for the select meeting1.CALL TO ORDER1.1 Territory AcknowledgementThe City of Maple Ridge carries out its business on the traditional andunceded territories of the Katzie (q̓ic̓әy̓) First Nation and the Kwantlen(qʼʷa:n̓ƛʼәn̓) First Nation.2.AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA4.ADOPTION OF MINUTES4.1 Minutes – Special (to Close) Meeting – July 9, 2024 – Regular Council Meeting – July 9, 2024 – Report of Public Hearing – July 16, 20245.PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL6.DELEGATIONS6.1 Ridge Meadows Burrards Lacrosse – U11B Allstar Team ­ 2024 Jack CrosbyTournament Tier 3 Division ChampionsPresentation from Sasha Passaglia, Ridge Meadows Burrards Lacrosse7.CONSENT AGENDARECOMMENDATION: That the following items on the July 23, 2024,Regular Council Consent Agenda be received into record.7.1 Disbursements for the month ended June 30, 2024Staff report dated July 23, 2024, disbursements summary for the month endedJune 30, 2024.7.2 2024 Council ExpensesStaff report dated July 23, 2024, Council expenses recorded to June 30, 2024.8.UNFINISHED BUSINESS9.BYLAWS 9.1 2021­352­RZ, 23613 132 Avenue, RS­2 to RM­1To permit the future construction of 18 townhomes.RECOMMENDATION:1.    That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7787­2021 be given second reading, and beforwarded to Public Hearing;2.    That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:i)    Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenantand receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;ii)    Road dedication at the intersection of 132 Avenue and 236 Street as requiredby design;iii)    Consolidation of the subject properties;iv)    Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, whichaddresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development;v)    Removal of existing building(s);vi)    In addition to the Ministry of Environment Site Disclosure Statement, adisclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advisingwhether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subjectproperty. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that thesubject property is not a contaminated site.vii)    That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $133,200.00 ($7,400.00/unit),or such rate applicable at third reading of this application, be provided in keepingwith the Council Policy 6.31 with regard to Community Amenity Contributions.9.2 2016­195­CP, Employment Lands: Re­designation of the Yennadon Lands toIndustrial (Employment Park Category), Official Community Plan Amending BylawNo. 7734­2021 (Policy) and 7735­2021 (Land Use Designation)To implement the Yennadon Lands Concept Plan into the Official Community Planfor a future boutique employment park.RECOMMENDATION:That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734­2021 be adopted; andThat Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735­2021 be adopted.10. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONSThe items in the “Committee Reports and Recommendations” category are staff reports presented atan earlier Committee of the Whole meeting, typically a week prior, to provide Council with anopportunity to ask staff detailed questions. The items are now before the Regular Council meeting fordebate and vote. Both meetings are open to the public.10.1 Demolition Requirement In­Stream Rezoning ApplicationsTo remove the requirement to demolish existing dwellings prior to rezoningadoption of in­stream applications.RECOMMENDATION:That Council authorize the Director of Planning to waive the rezoning requirementfor removing existing dwellings before the adoption of the rezoning bylaw for the16 in­stream applications, as of July 2, 2024, affected by the SSMUH legislation,except in cases where the subject property is actively violating bylaws or isdeemed unsightly or a nuisance.10.2 2024­155­VP, 11300 Pazarena Place,  Development Variance PermitTo increase the fence height for a daycare play area associated with thecommercial/residential building nearing completion.RECOMMENDATION:That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2024­155­VPrespecting property located at 11300 Pazarena Place. 10.3 Urban Forest Management Strategy – Final The Urban Forest Management Strategy has been developed using input from staff, Council and community engagement. The Urban Forest Management System consists of 4 key goals, 10 strategies, and 59 detailed action items to achieve the target of a 40% tree canopy coverage within the urban area by 2045. RECOMMENDATION: That the Urban Forest Management Strategy be endorsed in principle. 10.4 The Patch Brewery Liquor License Lounge Endorsement Application for a brewery lounge endorsement as an amendment to the existing manufacturer's license to allow onsite alcohol sales and consumption from 9:00 am to 10:00 pm Monday to Sunday. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the application for a brewery lounge endorsement, as an amendment to their manufacturer license, by The Patch Brewery Inc. located at 12745 Laity Street, Maple Ridge, be supported based on the information contained in the Council report dated July 16, 2024. 2. That a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch in accordance with the legislative requirements. 11.STAFF REPORTS 11.1 2024 Strategic Work Plan – Quarterly Report Q2 2024 Staff report dated July 23, 2024, providing an overview of initiatives being implemented to advance Council’s Strategic Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That Council receive the Quarterly Report­Q2 2024 for information. 12.OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 13.PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD 14.MAYOR AND COUNCILLOR VERBAL REPORTS 15.NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING 16.ADJOURNMENT Document:3967882 City of Maple Ridge SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 9, 2024 The Minutes of the City Council Meeting held virtually and hosted in the Blaney Room on July 16, 2024, at 6:00 9m at City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia for the purpose of transacting special City business. PRESENT Elected Officials Mayor D. Ruimy Councillor K. Carreras (virtual) Councillor J. Dueck Councillor O. Dozie Councillor S. Schille Councillor J. Tan Councillor A. Yousef ABSENT Appointed Staff S. Hartman, Chief Administrative Officer C. Mushata, Corporate Officer, Director of Legislative Services Other Staff Z Lifshiz, Director, Strategic Development, Communications and Public Engagement Note: These Minutes are posted on the City’s Web Site at https://mapleridge.primegov.com/public/portal. Note: Councillor Carreras attended the meeting virtually. 1. CALL TO ORDER – 6:00 pm 1.1. Territory Acknowledgement The Mayor provided the land acknowledgement. 1.2. Approval of the Agenda R/2024-S(C)-035 Moved, seconded THAT the agenda of the July 9, 2024, Special Council Meeting be adopted. CARRIED 2. MINUTES – Nil 3. NEW BUSINESS 4. GENERAL MATTERS Special Council (to Close) Meeting Minutes July 9, 2024 Page 2 of 2 Document:3967882 4.1 Resolution to Exclude the Public R/2024-S(C)-036 Moved, seconded THAT, pursuant to Section 90 of the Community Charter, this meeting be closed to the public as the subject matter being considered relates to the following: 90(1)(l) discussions with municipal officers and employees respecting municipal objectives, measures and progress reports for the purposes of preparing an annual report under section 98 [annual municipal report]. CARRIED 3. GENERAL MATTERS 4. NEW BUSINESS 5. INFORMATION ITEMS 6. ITEMS TO BE RELEASED FROM CLOSED STATUS 7. ADJOURNMENT – 6:51 pm _______________________________ D. Ruimy, Mayor Certified Correct: ___________________________ C. Mushata, Corporate Officer Document: 3831315 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 9, 2024 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held virtually and hosted in Council Chambers on July 9, 2024, at 7:00 pm at City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC for the purpose of transacting regular City business. PRESENT Elected Officials Mayor D. Ruimy Councillor K. Carreras (Virtual) Councillor O. Dozie Councillor J. Dueck Councillor S. Schiller Councillor J. Tan Councillor A. Yousef ABSENT Appointed Staff S. Hartman, Chief Administrative Officer C. Mushata, Corporate Officer T. Thompson, Director of Finance Other staff as required M. Best, Interim Director of Planning C. Bevacqua, Clerk 3 S. Faltas, Director of Engineering J. Kim, Computer Support Specialist and Consultation Z. Lifshiz, Director, Strategic Development, Communications and Public Engagement M. McMullen, Manager of Development & Environmental Services V. Richmond, Director of Parks & Facilities T. Westover, Director Economic Development Note: These Minutes and a video of the meeting are posted on the City’s Web Site at https://mapleridge.primegov.com/public/portal Note: Councillor Carreras attended the meeting virtually 1. CALL TO ORDER – 7:00 pm 1.1. Territory Acknowledgement The Mayor provided the land acknowledgement. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA - Nil 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3.1. Approval of the Agenda R/2024-CM-123 Moved and seconded That the agenda for the July 9, 2024, Regular Council meeting be approved as circulated. CARRIED Regular Council Meeting Minutes July 9, 2024 Page 2 of 5 Document: 3868228 4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 4.1. Minutes R/2024-CM-124 Moved and seconded That the following minutes be adopted as circulated: • Special (to Close) Meeting – June 25, 2024 • Regular Council Meeting – June 25, 2024 • Special Council Meeting – July 2, 2024 CARRIED 5. PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL – Nil 6. DELEGATIONS 6.1 Ridge Meadow Minor Softball Association – PRIDE 2006B Team – Gold Medal Victory 2024 Canada Cup International Softball Championship Presentation from Rebecca Stiles, Ridge Meadows Minor Softball Association 7. CONSENT AGENDA R/2024-CM-125 Moved and seconded To remove Item #7.3 from the Consent Agenda. CARRIED R/2024-CM-126 Moved and seconded That the information contained in the following items excluding Item #7.3 on the July 9, 2024 Regular Council Consent Agenda be received into record. CARRIED R/2024-CM-127 Moved and seconded That Item #7.3 on the July 9, 2024 Regular Council Consent Agenda be received into record. CARRIED Regular Council Meeting Minutes July 9, 2024 Page 3 of 5 Document: 3868228 7.1 Disbursements for the month ended May 31, 2024 Staff report dated July 9, 2024, disbursements summary for the month ended May 31, 2024 7.2 2024 Council Expenses Staff report dated July 9, 2024, Council expenses recorded to May 31, 2024. 7.3 Petition – Request to Remove Public Bridge from Construction Project Request to remove the building of a public bridge from the watermain project crossing the North Alouette River at the 233 Street intersection with Birch Avenue. 7.4 Contracts Exceeding $750,000 Staff report dated July 9, 2024, list of awarded contracts that exceed $750,000 approved by the CAO in accordance with Procurement Policy 5.45 for the period March 14, 2024 to June 28, 2024. 7.5 HUB Cycling – Building healthier communities and reducing intersection crashes in the City of Maple Ridge Correspondence dated June 30, 2024 from HUB Cycling, Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Local Committee. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS – Nil 9. BYLAWS 9.1 2019-255-RZ,12297 222 Street, 22175 and 22185 123 Avenue, Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 8003-2024 To enter into a Housing Agreement to accommodate the future construction of an eight-storey rental Apartment/Group Child Care Centre building. R/2024-CM-128 Moved and seconded That Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 8003-2024 for 12297 222 Street, 22175 123 Avenue, and 22185 123 Avenue be given first, second and third reading. CARRIED 10. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS – Nil Regular Council Meeting Minutes July 9, 2024 Page 4 of 5 Document: 3868228 11. STAFF REPORTS 11.1 2024-2034 Canada Community-Building Fund Agreement The Canada Community-Building Fund provides dedicated and predictable funds to each local government in the province. The funds are earmarked for investments in local infrastructure and capacity-building priorities, aligning with the City’s long term development goals. R/2024-CM-129 Moved and Seconded That Council authorize the Mayor and Corporate Officer to sign the 2024-2034 Canada Community-Building Fund Agreement on behalf of the City of Maple Ridge. CARRIED 12. OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 12.1 Appointment of Voting Delegates for the 2024 MIABC AGM To change the designated voting delegates for the Municipal Insurance Association of BC Annual General Meeting. R/2024-CM-130 Moved and Seconded That Council appoint Councillor Korleen Carreras as the voting delegate, Mayor Dan Ruimy as the first alternate and the Chief Administrative Officer as the second alternate for the Municipal Insurance Association of BC 2024 Annual General Meeting. CARRIED 13. PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD Two members of the public participated in public question period. 14. MAYOR AND COUNCILLORS’ REPORTS Mayor and Council provided an update on their participation in recent community events. 15. NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS – Nil Regular Council Meeting Minutes July 9, 2024 Page 5 of 5 Document: 3868228 16. ADJOURNMENT – 7:40 pm ______________________________ D. Ruimy, Mayor Certified Correct: __________________________________ C. Mushata, Corporate Officer Document: 3357098 City of Maple Ridge Report of Public Hearing July 16, 2024 The report of the Public Hearing held as a virtual meeting hosted in the Council Chambers on July 16, 2024, at 7:00 pm at City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia. PRESENT Elected Officials Mayor D. Ruimy Councillor K. Carreras Councillor O. Dozie Councillor J. Dueck Councillor S. Schiller Councillor J. Tan (Virtual) Councillor A. Yousef (Virtual) ABSENT Appointed Staff S. Hartman, Chief Administrative Officer C. Mushata, Corporate Officer Other staff as required M. Best, Interim Director of Planning C. Bevacqua, Clerk 3 J. Kim, Computer Support Specialist M. McMullen, Manager of Development & Environmental Services Note: These Minutes and a video of the meeting are posted on the City’s Web Site at https://mapleridge.primegov.com/public/portal Note: Councillor Tan and Councillor Yousef attended the meeting virtually. CALL TO ORDER – 7:00 pm The Mayor called the meeting to order and provided the land acknowledgement. The Corporate Officer explained the procedure and rules of order of the Public Hearing and advised that the bylaws will be considered at the Council Meeting on July 30, 2024. The Mayor then called upon Planning Department staff to present the following items on the agenda: 2. BUSINESS 2.1 Application 2019-255-RZ 12297 222 Street and 22175 and 22185 123 Avenue Parcel “A” (Reference Plan 12909) Lot 5 Except: Firstly: Parcel “B” (Reference Plan 13374); Secondly: Parcel “D” (Explanatory Plan 13727); District Lot 396 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 830; Lot 9 District Lot 396 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 15728; and Lot 10 District Lot 396 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 15728. Public Hearing Report July 16, 2024 Page 2 of 3 The subject application is to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (Single Detached Residential) to CD-6-21 (Medium Density Mixed Use Rental and Market Apartment Residential), as amended, based on the RM-2 zone, to accommodate an eight-storey rental apartment building with 106 rental residential units. Of the 106 units, 52 of the units will be market rental, 54 of the units will be affordable rental units secured under a housing agreement. A group childcare centre and an ancillary office space are also proposed. The statutory requirements have been met for this public hearing, with notices posted in the July 5th and July 12th editions of the local newspaper and 263 notices were mailed out and 1 piece of correspondence was received in relation to this application. The Manager of Development & Environmental Services gave a detailed presentation providing information on the application. The Mayor called for first round of public input. Rob Czens, Maple Ridge resident, spoke in support of the overall application, supportive of environmental covenants being put in place; had concerns about parking and massive reduction in stalls, building height and variances for setbacks. Lynn Curry, Maple Ridge resident, spoke in support of the development, would like surrounding nature and streams to be protected. The Mayor called for second round of public input. The Mayor called for a third round of public input. Loutfig Demirjian, Maple Ridge resident, spoke in support of the development noting the application will assist with the lack of stable housing for disabled people and seniors; likes that the applicant has made efforts for a green footprint. Susie, Maple Ridge resident, expressed concerns with street parking in the area, as residences do not have places to park larger work vehicles, and that increased development in area will increase street crime. They posed questions regarding parking stall size and distribution of stalls per unit. There being no further comment, the Mayor declared the Public Hearing on this item closed. Public Hearing Report July 16, 2024 Page 3 of 3 The Mayor declared the Public Hearing adjourned at 7:39 pm. ________________________________ D. Ruimy, Mayor Certified Correct: ___________________________________ C. Mushata, Corporate Officer ~ Maple Ridge - TO: His Worship Mayor Dan Ruimy and Members of Council MEETING DATE: July 23, 2024 FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: SUBJECT: Disbursements for the month ended June 30, 2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 05-1630-01-2024 Council The disbursements summary for the past period is attached for information. All voucher payments are approved by the Director of Finance or Deputy Director of Finance. Expenditure details are available by request through the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION: That the disbursements as listed below for the month ended June 30, 2024 be received for information. DISCUSSION: GENERAL PAYROLL PURCHASE CARD a) Background Context: $ 18,307,229 $ 4,757,310 $ ___ ~1=3~7-J-",8~0=8 $ 23.203.347 The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. All disbursements are subjected to the appropriate approvals through the City's Procurement Policy. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the Financial Plan Bylaw or subsequently approved through Council Resolution. b) Citizen/Customer Implications: The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis offinancial disbursements. 3967277 Page 1 of 2 c) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Highlights of larger items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution • Conwest Contracting Ltd -203 St watermain replacement $ 1,041,086 • Downtown Maple Ridge Business -BIA funding & security $ 180,174 • English Bay Law Corporation, In Trust-Land acquisition $ 1,199,502 • Fraser Valley Regional Library-Quarterly members assessment $ 864,259 • I.D.R. Commercial Construction Management Inc -Data recabling & $ 94,715 server room relocation • Lafarge Canada Inc -Abernethy Way road improvements $ 475 ,091 • Metro Vancouver Regional District -Water consumption $ 573,883 • RCMP -Quarterly RCMP contract payment $ 4,492,531 • Tritech Group Ltd -Reservoir expansion (263 St) $ 560 ,090 d) Policy Implications: Corporate governance practice includes reporting the disbursements to Council monthly. CONCLUSION: The disbursements for the month ended June 30, 2024 have been reviewed and are in order. Prepared by: Trevor Hansvall, CPA Accountant 3 Approved by: 1'revor p,ompson, BBA, CPA, CGA Director of Finance l~-s--~ s.....__ ?=> Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer 3967277 Page 2 of 2 VENDOR NAME 0946235 BC Ltd ADS Environmental Technologies Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd Arcadis Professional Services Ascendant Strategy Management Group Lie Associated Fire Safety Avenue Machinery Corp Badger Daylighting Lp BC Hydro Bell Mobility Inc Black Press Group Ltd Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd CUPE Local 622 Cascade Wear Ltd Cobing Building Solutions Conwest Contracting Ltd Davey Tree Expert Co Downtown Maple Ridge Business Drake Excavating (2016) Ltd EMCO Corporation English Bay Law Corporation, In Trust Family Education & Support Centre Flow Systems Distribution Inc Fortis BC Fraser Valley Regional Library Geoadvice Engineering Inc Golden Ears Winter Club Green Landscape Experts Ltd Hallmark Facility Services Inc HCMA Architecture & Design I.D.R. Commercial Construction Management Inc IDRS Image Painting & Restoration lntroba Canada Lip ISL Engineering & Land Services Jacks Automotive & Welding Katzie Development Partnership Lafarge Canada Inc Leaders International Executive Liu, Ying Maclean Homes (Edge 3) Ltd Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council Maple Ridge 2024 BC Summer Games Maple Ridge Museum & Archives McElhanney Consulting Services Metro Vancouver Regional District Mortise Construction Ltd Municipal Insurance Association Municipal Pension Plan BC New Rhodes Construction Inc Northwest Hydraulic Consultant Open Storage Solutions Inc Pacific Blue Cross Prime Traffic Solutions Ltd Provi nee of BC CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS -June 2024 DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT Light landscaping & mowing Sanitary sewer flow monitoring Professional fees (design services) Sanitary sewer network analysis & planning Software maintenance Firefighter equipment Boom flail mower Hydro-excavation (multiple locations) Electricity Telecommunications Advertising Electrical work Union dues (employee remittance) Water proof gear/jackets Facilities repairs, maintenance & upgrades 203 St watermain replacement (Lougheed to Thorne Ave) Roadside chipping & tree removals BIA funding & security Pump station maintenance Works yard inventory Land acquisition Community network coordination Pathways project Worksyard inventory Natural Gas Contributed capital replacement funding Quarterly members assessment Development of city-wide drainage model Rental revenue & summer operation agreement Supply & install miscellaneous trees/shrubbery Janitorial services & supplies Professional fees Data recabling & server room relocation Tax notice postage Painting & restoration services Climate action plan Professional fees (design services) Fire Dept equipment repairs Archeological assessments Abernethy Way road improvements (224 St to 230 St) Recruitment fees Security refund Security refund Arts Centre contract Program revenue City committed funding for summer games Fee for service Professional fees (design services) Water consumption Security refund Insurance deductibles Employer/employee remittance Cemetery co lumbaria expansion Drainage upgrade program (flow forecasting) Software maintenance Employer/employee remittance Traffic control Employer Health Tax AMOUNT 64,465 17,842 177,313 52,979 25,854 27,487 40,573 25,875 146,023 23,521 21,210 26,917 95,435 15,460 238,277 1,041,086 47,747 180,174 21,276 19,967 1,199,502 30,000 7,730 37,730 32,489 33,567 10,000 864,259 874,259 66,787 28,503 23,265 44,684 123,401 94,715 19,655 34,545 74,711 49,939 25,051 29,121 475,091 17,851 99,920 189,410 61,022 45,614 106,636 45,000 114,554 73,635 573,883 317,250 67,150 674,671 24,639 43,270 15,860 275,267 22,019 230,818 VENDOR NAME Ram Engineering Ltd Raybern Erectors Ltd RCMP Receiver General For Canada RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ridge Meadows Seniors Society Sandpiper Contracting Lip Signal West Contracting Ltd Simarn Homes Ltd Source Office Furniture Spot on Landscaping Services Stantec Consulting Ltd Strata Plan LMS Commercial Suncor Energy Products Tantus Solutions Group Inc Thiessen, Robin Charles Top Team Construction Ltd Tritech Group Ltd Tundra Plumbing Ltd Urban Matters Ltd Valley Traffic Systems Inc Vici Cruiter Inc Warrington PCI Management Westridge Security Ltd Whitestar Property Services Wolseley Canada Inc WSP Canada Inc Yang, Yi Lin Young, Anderson -Barristers Disbursements In Excess $15,000 Disbursements Under $15,000 Total Payee Disbursements Payroll Purchase Cards -Payment Total Disbursements June 2024 DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT Cottonwood landfill closure costs Minor parks upgrades (handrails, gates, fences) Quarterly RCMP contract payment Employer/employee remittance Ice rentals Semi-annual operating grant Sanitary & storm sewer upgrades (hold back release) Pedestrian path lighting replacement (Whonnock Lake Park) Security refund Office furniture & equipment Vegetation control+ light landscaping Professional fees (design services) Panorama strata fees (ECRA Facility) Gasoline & diesel fuel Professional fees Hub costs Security refund Reservoir expansion (263 St) Facilities maintenance & repairs Housing needs report & action plan Traffic calming Annual subscription renewal & support Tower advance Community patrols & static guard service Parks mowing & trimming+ light landscape Worksyard inventory Professional fees (design services) Security refund Professional fees PP24/12 & PP24/13 AMOUNT 102,258 21,125 4,492,531 2,447,803 79,335 133,408 340,440 16,275 17,000 18,669 20,685 15,345 18,111 56,083 18,113 23,520 25,305 560,090 64,669 20,391 26,527 34,913 100,000 47,43 1 47,357 28,859 18,653 18,433 27,728 17,309,385 997,844 18,307,229 4,757,310 138,808 23,203,347 ~ Maple Ridee - TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Dan Ruimy and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer 2024 Council Expenses EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: July 23, 2024 05-1880-20-2024 Council In keeping with Council's commitmentto transparency in local government, the attached schedule lists Council expenses recorded to June 30, 2024. The expenses included on the schedule are those required to be reported in the annual Statement of Financial Information and are available on our website. RECOMMENDATION: For information. DISCUSSION: The expenses included in the attached schedule are those reported in the annual Statement of Financial Information (SOFI), including those incurred under Policy No. 3.07 "Council Training, Conferences and Association Building". The budget for Council includes the provision noted in Policy No. 3.07 as well as a separate budget for cell phone and iPad usage. The amounts on the attached schedule are those recorded prior to the preparation of this report and are subject to change. Prepared by: Kim Hayes Accountant 2 :r-=~---· Approved by: / Trevor Thompson Director of Finance Attachments: 2024 Council Expenses 3858106 Reviewed by: Catherine Nolan, CPA, CGA Deputy Director of Finance Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer Page 1 of 1 2024 Council Expenses Cell Phones Conferences Community As at June 30, 2024 /iPads & Seminars Events Other Grand Total Carreras, Korleen January Cell phone charges 38.52 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 31.49 February Cell phone charges 33.17 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 62.03 March Cell phone charges 33.17 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 15.21 April Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 11.81 RM RCMP 150 Anniversary & Awards Night 50.00 Chamber of Commerce Event 25.00 May Cell phone charges 38.52 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 32.05 LMLGA Conference 1,142.60 June Cell phone charges 38.52 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 22.68 FCM Annual Conference 2,605.38 Carr_eras, Korl_een Total 382.85 3,747.98 75.00 4,205.83 Dozie, Onyeka January Cell phone charges 33.17 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 8.56 February Cell phone charges 38.52 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 8.56 Pathfinder Youth Centre Society Event 35.00 March Cell phone charges 33.17 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 38.41 RM South Asian Cultural Society Charity Gala 150.00 April Cell phone charges 33.17 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 9.09 RM RCMP 150 Anniversary & Awards Night 50.00 Chamber of Commerce Event 25.00 Maple Ridge Christian School -Gala En Bleu 110.00 May Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 8.56 LM LGA Conference 1,074.60 June Cell phone charges 33.17 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 8.56 Celebrating Women in Business 135.00 - Dozie,_.~nyeka Total 278.62 1;074.60 505.00 1,858.22 2024 Council Expenses Cell Phones Conferences Community As at June 30, 2024 /iPads & Seminars Events Other Grand Total Dueck,Judy January Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 8.56 February Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 8.56 March Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 8.56 April Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 8.56 RM RCMP 150 Anniversary & Awards Night 50.00 May Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 8.56 June Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 8.56 Celebrating Women in Business 135.00 Dueck, JudyTota,I i .· 51.36 185.00 236.36 · Ruimy, Dan January Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 8.56 February Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 8.56 Afro Gala 2024 50.00 March Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 8.56 RM South Asian Cultural Society Charity Gala 150.00 April Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 8.56 RM RCMP 150 Anniversary & Awards Night 50.00 Maple Ridge Christian School -Gala En Bleu 110.00 May Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 8.56 LM LGA Conference 1,074.60 June Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 8.56 FCM Annual Conference 2,462.03 Celebrating Women in Business 135.00 UITP Conference 579.55 Rujmy, Dan Total 205.44 4,116.18 495.00 4,816.62 2024 Council Expenses Cell Phones Conferences Community As at June 30, 2024 /iPads & Seminars Events Other Grand Total Schiller, Sunny January Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad} 14.61 February Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad} 62.06 Afro Gala 2024 50.00 March Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad} 22.72 High Ground 2024 475.87 April Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad} 17.31 May Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad} 18.37 June Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 27.65 Celebrating Women in Business 135.00 Schiller, Sunny Total 316.80 475.87 185;00 • 977.67 Tan, Jenny January Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 19.69 February Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad} 62.06 Housing Summit 455.00 March Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad} 58.26 High Ground 2024 290.87 RM South Asian Cultural Society Charity Gala 150.00 April Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 57.95 RM RCMP 150 Anniversary & Awards Night 50.00 May Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad} 62.06 LMLGA Conference 1,015.85 June Cell phone charges 25.68 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. IPad) 62.06 Tan, Jenny Total 476.16. 1;761.72 200.00 2,431:88 2024 Council Expenses Cell Phones Conferences Community As at June 30, 2024 /iPads & Seminars Events Other Grand Total Yousef, Ahmed January Cell phone charges 28.89 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 38.47 February Cell phone charges 23.54 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 53.35 March Cell phone charges 28.89 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 24.16 RM South Asian Cultural Society Charity Gala 150.00 April Cell phone charges 28.89 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 39.87 RM RCMP 150 Anniversary & Awards Night 50.00 Chamber of Commerce Event 25 .00 Maple Ridge Christian School -Gala En Bleu 110.00 May Cell phone charges 58.85 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 62.05 LMLGA Conference 1,142.60 June Cell phone charges 58.85 Portable electronic device charges (e.g. I Pad) 62.06 Celebrating Women in Business 135.00 Yousef, Al:lmed Total . 507.87 .• •• 1;142.60 · 470.00 2,120.47 ' Grand Total 2,219.10 12,318.95 2,115.00 16,653.05 • Maple Ridge - TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Dan Ruimy and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Second Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7787-2021 23613 132 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: July 16, 2024 FILE NO: 2021-352-RZ MEETING: COW An application has been received to rezone the subject property located at 23613 132 Avenue from RS- 2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential), to permit a future construction of 18 town houses. Council granted fi rst reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7787- 2021 on December 14, 2021. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP). Pursuant to Council Policy6.31, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program at a rate of $7,400.00 per townhouse dwelling unit for an estimated total amount of $133 ,200.00 or such rate applicable at third reading of this application. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7787-2021 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii) Road dedication at the intersection of 132 Avenue and 236 Street as required by design; iii) Consolidation of the subject properties; 2021-352-RZ Page 1 of 7 iv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; v) Removal of existing building(s); vi) In addition to the Ministry of Environment Site Disclosure Statement, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site. vii) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $133,200.00 ($7,400.00/unit), or such rate applicable at third reading of this application, be provided in keeping with the Council Policy 6.31 with regard to Community Amenity Contributions. DISCUSSION: 1. Background Context: Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Within Urban Area Boundary: Area Plan: OCP Major Corridor: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: South: 2021-352-RZ JinyongYum Lot 22 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 47603 Medium/High Density Residential Medium/High Density Residential Yes Silver Valley Area Plan No RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) Use: Townhouses Zone: Designation: Use: RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) Medium/High Density Residential Townhouses Zone: RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) Page 2 of 7 East: West: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing Requirement: Flood Plain: Fraser Sewer Area: 2. Background: Designation: Medium/High Density Residential Use: Bare-land (being prepped for townhouses) Zone: RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential Designation: Medium/High Density Residential Use: Residential Single Family Zone: RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) Designation: Medium/High Density Residential Single-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential (Townhouses) 0.406 ha (1.00 acres) 132Avenue Urban Standard No Yes The subject property is located on the corner of 132 Avenue and 236 Street (see Appendices A and B). There is an existing residential single-family dwelling located on-site which is surrounded by coniferous and deciduous vegetation. The terrain of the site consists of a gradual slope starting from the northeast corner declining towards the southwest corner of the property. The neighborhood is experiencing redevelopment with the predominate housing form being townhouses. As such , the subject application is consistent with the redevelopment trends in the immediate area. 3. Project Description: The subject rezoning application proposes to construct 18 dwelling units in the form of a townhouse development with access from 132 Avenue (see Appendix D). Each dwelling unit will have a double car garage with at least one parking space equipped with roughed-in electrical infrastructure capable of Level 2 charging for an electric vehicle. Four (4) visitor parking spaces are provided, meeting the requirements of the Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw. Minor setback variances are being requested that will impact the rear, interior and exterior lot line setbacks from 7.5 m down to a minimum of 5.8 m. A detailed analysis of the variances is included in Section 4. iv) below. 4. Planning Analysis: i) Official Community Plan: The development site is located adjacent to the River Village within the Silver Valley Area Plan and is currently designated Medium/High Density Residential. The Medium/High Density Residential land use 2021-352-RZ Page 3 of 7 designation supports a range of single-family zones as well as the RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) zone. This project has a similar lower density to the RM-1 townhouse projects to the immediate north and east. The following Area Plan policies provide additional guidance for a multi- family development on the development site: 5.2.9 b) River Village is pedestrian-oriented and is a walkable scale, with a significant number of residents within a 5-minute walk. 7.4 j) Townhouse developments should be integrated with other forms of housing within the same block, and are encouraged to front onto streets rather than onto internal enclaves. The form and character of townhouse developments should be compatible with neighboring residential scale and should reflect the design variety of its context. ii) Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located from RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) (see Appendix C) to permit the construction of 18 townhouse units (see Appendix D). Related variances are listed below. iii) Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: The subject 18-unit proposal provides two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit, with 14 of these units, contained within four (4) buildings having double-car garages. The other four (4) units have tandem parking available, which is permissible as they represent less than 30% of the total residential parking provided as permitted under Council Policy 6.35. Under the current Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw 4350-1990, at least one parking space per dwelling unit is required to be provided with roughed- in infrastructure capable of providing Level 2 charging. There are four (4) visitor parking spaces required for this development, and the minimum for this requirement has also been met. One space is designated as an accessible space. iv) Proposed Variances: A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves the following relaxations, which are consistent with surrounding developments (see Appendix D): • To reduce the exterior side setback from 6.0 meters to 5.0 meters • To reduce the rear lot line setback from 7.5 meters to 5.8 meters • To reduce the interior side setback from 7.5 meters to 6.3 meters 2021-352-RZ Page 4 of 7 The requested variances to the RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) zone will be the subject of a future Council report. These variances are supportable due to the consistency in setbacks with the surrounding developments and maintenance of the neighborhoods form and character. There is also an Engineering Department variance included in Section 6.i) below for undergrounding of services, supportable under Policy 9.05 -Conversion of Existing Overhead Utility Wiring. v) Development Permits: Pursuantto Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. vi) Advisory Design Panel: The application was reviewed and supported by the Advisory Design Panel at the September 20, 2023 meeting and their comments and the applicant's response can be seen in Appendix H. A detailed description of the project's form and character will be included in a future Development Permit report to Council. vii) Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting hosted by the applicant was held at Yennadon School (23347 128 Avenue) on May 21, 2024. Three (3) people attended the meeting. The notification requirements for the Development Information Meeting include a mail-out, newspaper advertisements, and notice on the development signs that provides the contact information for the developer and information on the development. A summary of the main comments and discussions with the attendees at the Development Information Meeting or Public Comment Opportunity was provided by the applicant and include the following main points: • Retention of significant trees on site • Undergrounding of BC Hydro services The following were provided by the applicant in response to the issues raised by the public: • The significant giant cedar at the north end of the project is being retained, with planting and landscaping plans to account for the new design 2021-352-RZ Page 5 of 7 • The existing overhead lines will not be converted to undergrounded. See section 4(iv) below. The on-site will be serviced with underground utilities only. 5. Environmental Implications: There are no requirements for an Environmental Development Permit for this application. An Arborist Report or Tree Management Plan as well as a Stormwater Management Plan are required and must be coordinated with existing protected trees, grading, drainages and landscaping plans. The applicant must also retain an environmental professional to identify if/what invasive plant species are on site and provide an Invasive Species Management Plan if required. 6. i) ii) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has indicated that the following servicing upgrades will be required through the Rezoning Servicing Agreement: • Road dedication as required to meet the design criteria of the Subdivision and Development Bylaw No. 4800-1993 • Utility servicing as required to meet the design criteria of the Subdivision and Development Bylaw No. 4800-1993 • Frontage upgrades to the applicable road standard As per Council Policy 9.05 -Conversion of Existing Overhead Utility Wiring, due to the frontage along 236 Street being less than 250.0 meters and that the BC Hydro infrastructure is 3-phase servicing, a variance can be supported with cash-in-lieu taken for the future conversion of the overhead lines to underground. Parks, Recreation and Culture Department: There are no comments from the Parks, Recreation and Culture Department for the rezoning application. 2021-352-RZ Page 6 of 7 CONCLUSION: It is recommended that first and second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7787-2021 and that application 2021-352-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. "Original Signed by Annie Slater-Kinghorn" Prepared by: Annie Slater-Kinghorn Planning Technician "Original Signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A-Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7787-2021 Appendix D -Site Plan Appendix E -Landscape Plan Appendix F -ADP Design Comments 2021-352-RZ "Original Signed by Marlene Best" Reviewed by: Marlene Best, RPP, MBA Interim Director of Planning Page 7 of 7 ,.__ ~ 13322 ~ rv 13318 13310 13306 13321 13317 13313 13309 I--en ~ (") N 13322 13319 13289 13283 13277 122 ,-------=:--r----===· "' C, ~ "' \ i(l "' I 13263 I I I I I I I ' '\, 13320 13312 0:: 0 ~ ~ ~ <( -~~--'---'--J..___L_L__j__.l_j__, ~ 133AVE Cll SUBJECT PROPERTY 1326 23691 23697 APPENDIX A z~r ... -C) C, "-"' "' 0 ii: ::it: u 0 0:: 23745 23747 I I r--r--,--~L ____ ~1 .... 1-~-----1 ,en I~ I 13227 13215 132 AVE Legend -stream ---Ditch Centreline -Edge of River N --Indefinite Creek .. River Scale: 1 :2,500 Street Name Labels IN I ' 13144 13104 23613 132 AVENUE PIO: 000-484-237 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MapleRidee FILE: 2021-352-RZ/DP DATE: Oct 27, 2021 BY:PC APPENDIX 8 23613 132 AVENUE PIO: 000-484-237 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ Maple Ridee FILE: 2021 -352-RZ/DP DATE: Oct 27, 2021 BY: PC CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7787-2021 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" Zoning Bylaw Map forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended APPENDIXC WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7787-2021." 2. That parcel of land and premises known and described as: Lot 22 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 47603 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1906 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is/are hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No . 7600-2019 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 14th day of December, 2021. READ a second time the day of 1 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of 1 20 READ a third time the day of 1 20 ADOPTED, the day of 1 20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 4 • 13305 1 RP 15218 RemA SCP 52028 24142 31 VE. - P 1105 18 PARK 32 *PP159 33 P 1105 17 PARK 35 34 *PP157 13227 13215 ~I tQ ~ ~ ~' i ~ :g ~ r;; ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 23697 33 ---C '--___ / II I, 'l ii EPP 53011 EPS4275 C"J 7 A EPP 53011 -:::J ' - P41 03 22 20 132AVE. "' i;: LMP 35468 133 AVE. N 0, ~ M a.. a.. w ,_J ~ ~ EPP 32492 Rem1 EPP 32491 /',(EPS 2081 'v PARK 132 AVE. ----------c --- 0 0, ffi ,..._ 1 ~ ~ -1,(.)------ C".) PARK ~ 2 13185 I -4 ,EPP73927 PARK EPP72565 / / 3 / 0 a, ,.._ ,.._ 15~ 16~ ~ E~ ~2!23 __ _ ~EPP 97181 1 L 13155 I EPP 97~80 ;JI Epp 97180 -([ ----"\ 'cl, •. 13178 14 [L 3 13177' ~ '----2 w _________ (Jl c-' 1317013 / . EEf', 9822~ / EP13725 6 4 13159 . ~~~n~::;a I l_1:1_so ________ A P 1105 113144 8 16 PARK I 7 L!l L!)_ L!l (l) ~ [L L!l L!l L!l <D ~ PARK EPP9 7 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: To: 7787-2021 1906 RS-2 (Single Detached Suburban Residential) RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) 23747 3 PAR 24 P48925 ~Maple ~ Ridee Urban Area Boundary ~ N SCALE 1:2,500 )> .. . . . 0 0 -., ~m~ '"J~ "' ~:.~ ' ~~ 13 2 N D AV E N U E ~ ~: ~ 15 ~ -- " ~~ - .~~ ·-: 0 ,,i _ '.' i _ C :_ · ~··(; , · i\: . 18 TO W N H O M E S 23 6 1 3 1 3 2 N D AV E N U E , MAP L E RID G E , BC AP P E N D I X D ~ § al ~8 ·3!J 0 1 ~ 3ld \ M '3nN 3 AV ON l E l El9 E l S3 W O H N M O . l 8~ - 1- - I I J_ i l . " . . ' ' -- ,~- ,' J : . I i ' . '· ,, 1. _ ,_i 1 S3 L ' I I O H N M 0 . 1 8 ~ 0 ..; ~ w a: ~ t:: :c .. , a: "' 2:; .. . . . 0 ~ ll 1 l ll ! l l ! ll l l t It :j) I S3 1 1 1 1 0 H N M O . L 8~ " z c ~ N 0 :; E S3 l / l l 0 H N M O . L 8~ L 0 M Cl .. , . <( ~8 '38 □1~ 3l d \ f f l '3 nN 3 A V 0N l £ ( n9 £ l S3 1 1 1 1 0 H N M 0 1 8 ~ 9 JS '39 0 1 H 3ld ' J W '3 n N 3 A V □Nm m, z S3 I / \ I O H N M O . l 8~ cl 0 L( ) 0 "< t " <( 1.1.J >< Cl z 1.1.J c.. c.. <( HARQSGAPf ANO MATER(A/ S I ff;fND l;c,YI lciri+I ~ AQUAPAVE PERMEABLE CONCRETE UNIT PAVER5 (80MM) ABBOTSFORD CONCRETE HERRINGBONE PATTERN; CHARCOAL Fl/il5H 2' x 2' ARISTOCRAT PORCELAIN PATIO SLABS PACIFIC COAST 6RAN/TE F/NJSH ABBOTSFORD CONCRETE PLA YFALL Rl/BBER TILES 2' x 2' STEPPING STONES ~ BROOM FINISH CONCRETE L;t:?';""fiA] CLEAR CRUSH 6RAVEL / DRAIN ROCK FENGIN6 I FGEND -0-----0-------6' SOLID h'OOD PERIMETER FENCE -----b' PRIVACY SCREEN FENCE -----42" r-/00D PICKET FENCE PROPERTY LINE ACER Glf.HA!.A HAI-E' AGER PALMATU-1 81.000500D" GHAW.EC:l'PARl:l~TKATI:161::0'PENOV..A' GH.\W\.EGYPARJ:10611hA '6RA(;ILl5' Plr.EAASIES 5TEJ,L,\RTIAP'SraOOCAJ-£lLIA THJ.JAOU.IOENTAl.l5lll'!AllDOl,l' 1-.EEPIHGi-.:;tOTU. Gl'PRE½ SLEl«R HINOKI UPRE% llORHAYsmJCE JAPA!E!:€!:>TEHARTIA 6RAIVOt,IGEOAR M2 JOB NUMBER, 22-038 PLANTED SIZE / REMARKS 25H HT; lbM $TD; LOW SID SHRW 25HHl:618;\FRIGt-HFORl1 2Ht1T:B18 2HHT:BIB 3HIIT:618 5G-HC-Al.151- :25MIIT;BlB MOTES, 'PLANT 5'12ES IU THIS LIST ARE SPECIFIED N'..c.O!WING TO THE BC, LA)DS('..Af'E STN<VARD, lATE<;.T EDITION. ('..Ot/TAlll;R $121:5 SffC,IFIED A$ PER C,HTA $TANOARD$. oorn PLANT $1ZE Nit! GOHTAl~R SIZE ARE Tt€ MINII-U-1 A(,C.Ef'TAfX.E $12ES. • REFER TO SF'EC.lflCATI016 FOR Df.Fl)l:D C,01/TAlll;R Mf:",~MEIHS NO OTHER Pl.Alff KATERIAL REGUIRa-i:NTS. • "1:ARCH AND REVIEH, HAY-f F'LANT M,>,f'ERIAL A\IAILA6lE FOR OPTIOUAl. REVIEH Bl' LANDSCAPE ARl:'..HllECT AT SOJR(,E OF !>JF'Pll'. A!<EA OF SEARGH TO INCLL/OE LOI-ER KAIN!..Ah'O ANO FRASER VALLEY.• 9.BSTIM 10)6, OOTAIN 1-"f<ITTEN APP!WVAL FROH THE l.ANO:,(,Af'f ARCHITECT F'RtOR TO KAKlt,15 AJ,t( 5"½TIM10!6 TO TI-€ SPEC,IFIEC> KATERIAL. WAPPROvED WBSTITVTIOl6 Hill. Bf R.E..EClED. Al.LOH A MINIHM OF FIVE OMS PRIOR TO liELIVERl' FOR REG!..E>T TO $CM$TIME. 5t.6STIMIOl6 ARE 51.e..Ec.T TO 6C LAH!)5(,APE STNOARD -DEFINITION Of CONDITI0!-6 OF AVAILABILIT'f. ALL PLANT MATERIAL MUST IIE PROVIDED FROM CERTIFIED DISEASE FREE NURSERY, PROVIDE CERTIFICATION UPON REQUEST. C,Cop,,,-,iM1<1'r,,dU,od"""'l"d"""""'"" oro .. ~,ol,..ll.ona.,,p,,.,,h.,o<t<,ndn"V"Olbo #220-26LorneMews New Westminster, British Columbia V3M3L7 SOD LAWN Tel: 604.553.0044 "''""'"''" Hf6RA."6..51.~ I Tlr-5EREDISE f ---_ --~ -RErArNT~~L : ~Jv1J: : ¼Y: ~ ~LD,G#~ ~ ~ ~ !'\ "':'•\ '□' · 1\el I i\m 1 • . ------::n ~---_-_:--------Df ____ ----- lJ Ll -~· \---? .. , 1m; ... :· '2'HIDfGOtlnlc,VS,OOPS-IRIP HHfT!~flORDf'RS n-------[a-------~· Ill□~#~ 'mv•' ffl : : '. : : I ,+--: ---i----------i • : • IBLD,G#)I m : m .: •: :., ... .,, fV\'(~\·ru~:- ~Tl: /"iA.LPY\\" TO 1-fjlf ENIR>' L________C,]1-------~71-------m, ',----; \--/-"---·:,:.--:.~.: --'4] BL□,G #51 \/ ~ \/ ,----,. -.----, /~\/ V ,f AU>W e,m, '""""' AU>.E, e,m, - Fax: 604.553.0045 Emai1:office@m2!a.com ~ PROPOSED TOWNHOMES 23!"13"132AVENUE MAPLE RIDGE, BC LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 '------------------------------------------------------------------------------------,;c'==_;·~;._;'"-'I' M21.APROlEC1Nt.!MSE~ June 5th, 2024 APPENDIX F JV ARCHITECTURE INC. 2nd Floor, 8661 201 St. Langley BC V2Y 0G9 t: 604 493 2001 e: contact@JYarch.com www .!Yarch com Jinyong Yum Principal Architect AIBC, LEED BD+C t: 604 493 2001 ext.700 e: jyum@JYarch.com Re: Final comments by ADP for the townhouse development at 23613 132nd Avenue, Maple Ridge (R/2023-ADP-037). Ms. Annie Slater-Kinghorn Planner, Planning Department City of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Dear Ms. Slater-Kinghorn, Please see the following response to the comments by the ADP meeting (R/2023-ADP-037) for the proposed townhouse development at 23613 132nd Avenue, Maple Ridge. ARCHITECTURAL 1 . Show fire truck turning dimensions on site plans -A fire truck access route is added to the site plan. 2. Show garbage and recycling pickup locations on site plan. -Garbage and recycle bins will be pulled out from the garage and collected from the driveway. 3. Consider the fac;;ade articulation of white vertical Hardie Board on building #4 and #5 on A405. -Vertical Hardie siding is revised to shingle siding. 4. Visitor Parking: Consider the potential hazard that visitor parking spots 3&4 pose as they are reverse turning inside and outside. -Warning signage will be provided at the visitor's parking spaces, and a convex safety mirror will be installed at the driveway corner. LANDSCAPE 1 . Consider the use of detained stormwater for irrigation -We will review with civil and consider the use of detained stormwater for on-site irrigation. 2. Off-Site Landscaping: Ensure that off-site landscaping creates a suitable streetscape, offering effective screening and resolves the grading transition towards the intersection. • 11 large street tees at Bm 0. C. spacing along 236th Street will provide effective screening towards the west side of the site. We will review the grading at the corner of 236th Street and 132nd Ave to resolve the transition towards the intersection. JY ARCHITECTURE INC. 2nd Floor, 8661 201 St. Langley BC V2Y 0G9 t: 604 493 2001 e: contact@JYarch.com www ,JYarch com Jinyong Yum Principal Architect AIBC, LEED BD+C t: 604 493 2001 ext.700 e: jyum@JYarch.com 3. Pedestrian Access: Explore adding pedestrian access points along 236 Street, specifically between buildings 3&4 and 4&5. This approach has been implemented in the adjacent development and can contribute to a livelier street frontage -Pedestrian access along 236th Street has been provided with a concrete walkway proposed at the entry to the west outdoor amenity area from public sidewalk. Should you have any questions or require further clarification, feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, JV Architecture Inc. Jinyong Yum , Architect-AIBC, LEED BD+C Principal ~ Maple Ridee ~ Counc il Report TO: His Worship Mayor Dan Ruimy MEETING DATE: July 16, 2024 FILE NO: 2016-195-CP MEETING: cow SUBJECT: Employment Lands: Re-designation of the Yennadon Lands to Industrial (Employment Park Category) Final Reading Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 (Policy); and Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021 (Land Use Designation) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Yennadon Lands were identified as a potential location for future employment uses in the City's Commercial & Industrial Strategy (2014, 2015), with the Strategy recommending that planning for the additional supply of employment land should begin now in order to best satisfy future demand in an increasingly competitive region. The Yennadon Lands are comprised of 13 properties. They range in size from 0.5 ha (1.5 acres) to 4 ha (10 acres). The total land area is 25.4 hectares (63 acres), and are generally located at south-west of the intersection of 232 Street and 128 Avenue. The concept area plan endorsed by Council at the end of 2020 provided for a 100% employment future for the developable areas of the Yennadon Lands. Official Community Plan Amending Bylaws No. 7734- 2021 and No. 7735-2021 were drafted to integrate the Yennadon Lands Concept Plan into the Official Community Plan. • Official Community Plan (OCP) Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 sets out the policy necessary to implement the Yennadon Lands 'concept' in to the Official Community Plan by amending Chapter 6 'Employment' Subsection '6.4.2 Employment Park' as well as introducing Design Guidelines to be included in Chapter 8. • Official Community Plan (OCP) Amend ing Bylaw No. 7735-2021 provides the land use map changes necessary to implement the Yennadon Lands 'concept' by amending the City's Urban Area Boundary and Land Use Map included as Schedule B of the City's Official Community Plan. These OCP Amending Bylaws were granted first reading at the May 11, 2021 Regular Council Meeting, second reading at the April 12, 2022 Regular Council Meeting, presented at the May 17, 2022 Public Hearing and granted third reading at the May 24, 2022 Regular Council Meeting. Since then, staff have been working through the terms and conditions necessary to move the OCP Amending Bylaws to final reading, including the removal of 23154 128 from the Agricultural Land Reserve (2022-170-AL) and amending the Regional Growth Strategy and boundary to accommodate the 3861346 Page 1 of 6 ~ Maple Ridee Council Report - proposed uses. As this work has completed, OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 and OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021 can be considered by Council for final reading and adoption. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 be adopted; and That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) The Vennadon Lands (128 Ave and 232 Street) The Yennadon Lands are comprised of 13 properties. They range in size from 0.5 ha (1.5 acres) to 4 ha (10 acres). The total land area is 25.4 hectares (63 acres). The existing uses on the lands range from single- family use to vacant underutilized lands, according to BC Assessment data. The properties abut urban single-family development on the west and south boundaries; Agricultural Land Reserve to the east and north, and suburban single family lots on the north side of 128 Avenue. A historic commercial node, as well as Yennadon Elementary School, are located within 200-400 m of the subject properties. Currently, the subject properties are designated Agricultural in the OCP and are zoned RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). All of the properties are now located outside the Agricultural Land Reserve and are now designated as Industrial and Conservation and Recreation in the Regional Growth Strategy Metro 2050. b) Concept Plan Development and Overview The Yennadon Lands were identified as a potential location for future employment uses in the City's Commercial & Industrial Strategy (2014, 2015), with the Strategy recommending that planning for the additional supply of employment land should begin now in order to best satisfy future demand in an increasingly competitive region. Council directed staff to undertake an employment land use re- designation process and consultation strategy for the Yennadon Lands at the June 18, 2019 Council Workshop Meeting. At the March 31, 2020 Council Workshop meeting, staff provided an update on the Yennadon Lands Re- designation process, including the proposed community engagement process that was postponed due to the pandemic. At that meeting, Council directed that the previously endorsed Yennadon Lands process be revised and that staff work with the consultant to prepare some preliminary land use concepts for Council to review prior to proceeding with public consultation. 3861346 Page 2 of 6 ~ Maple Ridee -Council Report Atthe July 14, 2020 Council Workshop meeting, staff in collaboration with a consultant, presented three preliminary land use concepts for Council to review. At that meeting, Council directed staff to move forward with a public consultation process, taking into account the public health orders in effect at the time. At the December 8, 2020 Council workshop meeting, Council endorsed "Concept #2 -Neighbourhood Innovations Village" and directed staff to move forward with an Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw. The concept endorsed by Council at the end of 2020 provided for a 100% employment future for the developable areas of the Yennadon Lands. c) Concept Plan Based on Council comments, as well as what was heard from the community during the public consultation process, the following elements have been integrated into the policy work, design guidelines, and the land use schedule map associated with the re-designation of the Yennadon Lands towards an employment future: • Suitable Mix of Employment Uses: The employment area will need to have an appropriate mix and size of employment uses to generate suitable levels of job creation, while still affording a sensitive transition to the surrounding residential uses. • Neighbourhood Business Scale and Character: The design of the employment area will be limited to business activities primarily occurring inside a building to contain nuisance noise, odour, and other negative impacts. The building form will be more of a residential height and massing in the western area with generous landscape retention and reduced parking if possible. The eastern area may have larger and more conventional light industrial buildings. • Innovative Mixed Uses: The development of this site may include a mix of employment uses. • Environmental Sensitivity: Coho Creek will be protected and enhanced with the appropriate setbacks and a progressive stormwater management system on site. • Trail Network: A comprehensive trail network will connect to the adjoining communities and provide a rich amenity for both the businesses and residents to enjoy, promoting a healthy walking/biking culture. • Resilience and Adaptability: This employment neighbourhood will be designed and planned so that there is diversity and choice of business pa rcels and units that may adapt and consolidate or expand over time. • Climate-Change Responsive: The infrastructure and servicing will be designed for increased storm flows and special events, so the neighbourhood has the ability to weather through extreme climatic conditions with additional precautionary measures, including floodways and dry pond areas for emergency stormwater storage. The intent is to create a complete neighbourhood, within the existing residential area , where residents and business owners can live, work and play within a five to ten-minute walk or bicycle ride of their 3861346 Page 3 of 6 ~ MapleRidee Council Report - residence. This employment area should be uniquely smaller and scaled to fit with the surrounding neighbourhood, offering the potential for a variety of smaller scaled buildings with limited building heights and sizes. The natural environmental area of the site will be conserved, as the Coho Creek Conservation Area, with the required 30 metre setback areas to buildings and trails along its edges. The employment area will be linked by trails and natural open spaces, which in turn will be connected to the adjoining communities. A natural interconnected pathway and trail system is recommended for the site that connects to the surrounding neighbourhoods. A gravel horse trail runs along the south side of 128th Avenue adjoining the site. There are plans for a comprehensive bike lane and walking path for both 128th Avenue and 232nd Street in the future, that will incorporate bike lanes and a sidewalk/trail network. d) Official Community Plan Amending Bylaws Official Community Plan Amending Bylaws No. 7734-2021 and No. 7735-2021 were drafted to integrate the Yennadon Lands Concept Plan into the Official Community Plan. The two bylaws were presented at the May 4, 2021 Committee of the Whole Council Meeting and were subsequently forwarded to the May 11, 2021 Regular Council Meeting for Council consideration of first reading. Official Community Plan Amending Bylaws No. 7734-2021 and No. 7735-2021 were granted first reading at the May 11, 2021 Regular Council Meeting. Following the consideration and granting of first reading to the two Official Community Plan Amending Bylaws, staff initiated the referral and consultation process, set out under Section 475 of the Local Government Act, which was endorsed at the time of first reading. Through the referral process, it became necessary to re-draw the boundaries of the properties associated with Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021. Official Commun ity Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021 was amended and had two properties removed -the properties known as 12791232 Street and 23154 128 Avenue. • The property at 23154128 Avenue was removed due to the development application (2019-119- RZ) associated with the site moving towards a Commercial future, and its own associated Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw. • The property at 23154 128 Avenue is now captured under Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7838-2022 and will come forward for Final Reading separately. Council considered the amended Official Community Plan Amend ing Bylaw No. 7734-2021 and amended Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021 for second reading, and Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7838-2022 for first and second reading at the April 12, 2022 Council Meeting. 3861346 Page 4 of 6 ~ Maple Ridee Council Report - The three Official Community Plan Amending Bylaws were then forwarded to the May 17, 2022 Public Hearing. The three Official Community Plan Amending Bylaws were considered for and granted third reading at the May 24, 2022 Regular Council Meeting. Following third reading, staff began working through the terms and conditions necessary for the bylaws to be considered for final reading or adoption, namely: • That 23154 128 Ave be excluded from the Agricultural Land Reserve o In the fall of 2022, application 2022-170-AL to exclude 23154 128 Ave from the Agricultural Land Reserve was presented to Council at the October 18, 2022 Committee of the Whole Council Meeting. o At the October 25, 2022 Regular Council Meeting, Council forwarded application 2022- 170-AL to Public Hearing. The application was presented at the November 22, 2022 Public Hearing and at the November 29, 2022 Regular Council Meeting, Council forwarded the application to the Agricultural Land Commission for their consideration. o On June 28, 2023, the City was notified that the property had been removed from the Agricultural Land Reserve. • That the Regional Growth Strategy be amended to include 23154 128 and 12791 232 and that the regional land use designations be amended. o In August of 2023, City staff initiated the process to adjust the Regional Containment Boundary and a Regional Growth Strategy Amendment for the Yennadon Lands. o Over the following months, multi pie presentations occurred with Metro Vancouver Staff as well as the Board. o On January 26, 2024 the Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1376, 2024 (Yennadon Lands) received first, second, and third reading from the Metro Vancouver Regional Board and was subsequently sent out to all Metro Vancouver members for comment. o In early June, the City was notified that the Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1376, 024 (Yennadon Lands) had been adopted by the Board at the May 31, 2024 Board Meeting. As these processes have now concluded, OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 and OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7838-2022 may now be considered for final reading. e) Strategic Alignment: Endorsing the Official Community Plan Amending Bylaws to implement the Yennadon Lands Concept Plan aligns with a number of strategic priorities within the 2023-2026 City of Maple Ridge Council Strategic Plan:, including Liveable Community, Climate Leadership and Environmental Stewardship, and Diversified, Thriving Economy 3861346 Page S of 6 ~ Maple Ridee -Council Report f) Policy Implications: There is an associated industrial zone (M-7) in draft form which was considered by Council at the February 14, 2023 Workshop Meeting. The proposed M-7 Zone is intended to be tailored to the unique uses and characteristics of the Yennadon Lands and could come forward in conjunction with a development application CONCLUSION: Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021 and Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021, to implement the Yennadon Lands Concept Plan into the Official Community Plan for a future boutique employment park, is before Council for consideration offinal reading and adoption. "Original Signed by Amanda Grochowich" Prepared by: Amanda Grochowich, MCIP, RPP Manager of Community Planning "Original Signed by Marlene Best" Approved by: Marlene Best, RPP, MBA Interim Director of Planning "Original Signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: (A) Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No . 7734-2021 (B) Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021 3861346 Page 6 of 6 CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7734-2021 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 APPENDIX A WHEREAS Section 4 77 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "A" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Policy Amending Bylaw No. 7734-2021." 2. That the Table of Contents is amended by inserting 6.4.2 Employment Park after 6.4.1 Industrial Lands and renumbering the following sections accordingly. 3. That Chapter 6 Employment, 6.4 Industrial Opportunities, 6.4.1 Industrial Lands, Policy 6-44 is amended by deleting the policy and replacing with the following: "6 -44 The Industrial land use designation is a key component of achieving a compact community. Within the Industrial designation, there are 3 industrial categories, the components of which are highlighted in this chapter: a) Business Park Industrial -lands that are located in the Maple Meadows Industrial Park and Albion Industrial Area. The Business Parks provide for a range of industrial uses and services, with an emphasis on landscaping and design. b) Employment Park Industrial -lands that are located in the Yennadon Lands Employment Park. Employment Park Industrial provides for a range of employment uses close to where people live while reducing possible negative impacts on existing surrounding neighbourhoods. c) General Industrial -lands that are located throughout the community and provide for a range of services and general industrial uses." 4. That Chapter 6 Employment is amended by inserting 6.4.2 Employment Park, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms a part of this bylaw as Schedule 1, following 6.4.1 Industrial Lands and renumbering the remaining sections, policies, and associated policy references accordingly. 5. That Chapter 8 Development Permit Area Guidelines be amended by inserting the following after "Ground-Oriented Residential Infill" on the Title Page: ♦ Yennadon Lands Employment Park 6. That Chapter 8 Development Permit Area Guidelines, Section 8.2 Application and Intent be amended by inserting the following after 8.2 (9): "10. Yennadon Lands Employment Park pursuant to Section 488 of the Local Government Act to establish guidelines for the form and character of intensive light industrial use and for the protection of natural features and ecologically significant land." 7. That Chapter 8 Development Permit Area Guidelines is amended by inserting the Yennadon Lands Employment Park Development Permit Area Guidelines, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms a part of this bylaw as Schedule 2, following after Section 8.14 Ground Oriented Residential Infill Development Permit Guidelines. 8. That Appendix C Zoning Matrix, Industrial Designations* be amended by inserting the following between "General Industrial Category" and "Business Park Category": Employment Park Category* (Subject to policies in Section 6.4.2) M-7 Employment Park Industrial 9. That Appendix C Zoning Matrix, Industrial Designations*, Business Park Category be amended by removing the reference to 'Section 6.4.2' and replacing it with 'Section 6.4.3' and that "M-7 Employment Park Industrial" be added after "M-3 Business Park". 10. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 11th day of May, 2021. READ a second time as amended the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the 24th day of May, 2022. ADOPTED, the day of , 202X. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 6.4.2 EMPLOYMENT PARK ISSUES • The City's Commercial & Industrial Strategy recommends planning for the additional supply of employment land in order to best satisfy future demand in an increasingly competitive region. • The Yennadon Lands are identified as a potential location for future employment use in the City's Commercial & Industrial Strategy. The impetus in identifying the Yennadon Lands for employment use was largely due to the lands being generally flat and underutilized, with the potential for urban level servicing, and located on arterial and collector roadways. OBJECTIVE • The aim of an Employment Park is to create a more "complete community" by providing a range of employment opportunities where local residents and future business owners can live, work and play within a five to ten minute walk or bicycle ride of their residence. • In the past, industrial and commercial areas have not always been good neighbours as they have brought consequences such as noise, visual impacts, and undesirable traffic to local areas. Therefore, the design of the employment area will be limited to business activities inside the building to eliminate nuisance noise, odour, and other negative impacts. • The Yennadon Lands Employment Park is 25.4 hectares (63 acres) in the north central part of the City of Maple Ridge . It is located on the south edge of 128 Avenue and the west edge of 232 Avenue. As it is bordered by residential land uses on the south and west edges, the Commercial & Industrial Strategy recommends development with a key focus on restricting heights, while also encouraging building forms and uses that are in keeping with the surrounding residential context. POLICIES 6 -51 Maple Ridge will designate Employment Parks in areas where there is an opportunity to increase job densities. The intent for high density Employment Parks is to encourage the right type and size of employment facilities that will help increase job opportunities close to home, as new and mature local businesses to locate closer to where their employees live. 6-52 Maple Ridge will direct development in a sensitive and scaled manner so that the Employment Park is compatible with the adjoining residential neighbourhood. 6 -53 An Employment Park will have an appropriate mix and size of employment uses to generate suitable levels of job creation, while still affording a sensitive transition to the surrounding uses. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 Chapter 6, Page 25 6-54 Maple Ridge will designate the Yennadon Lands, generally located south of 128th Ave and west of 232nd Street, for an Employment Park use. The Yennadon Lands serve growing industries, that include the technology sector, light manufacturing companies, and professional offices, all of which offer a high employment density. 6-55 Maple Ridge will consider an Employment Park development for the Yennadon Lands noting that: a )The eastern portion ofthe Yennadon Lands Employment Park may have larger and more conventional light industrial buildings; b) Maple Ridge will require a minimum lot consolidation of 75,000 square meters for employment park development on the eastern portion of the Yennadon Lands; c) The western portion of the Yennadon Lands Employment Park will have a building form that is similar to that of a single-detached residential dwelling height and massing with generous landscape retention and reduced parking, where possible; d) Maple Ridge will require a minimum lot consolidation of 35,000 square meters for employment park development on the western portion ofthe Yennadon Lands; and d) Development must align with the Yennadon Lands Employment Park Development Permit Area Guidelines found in Chapter 8 ofthe City's Official Community Plan. Chapter 6, Page 26 YENNAOON LANDS Efv!PLOY/v!ENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia Draft. v4 April 5, 2022 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The City of Maple Ridge would like to sincerely thank the following contributors who helped shape these design guidelines to help ensure that what is planned and developed for the Yennadon Lands Employment Park is sensitive to the adjoining residential neighbourhoods and the natural environment. Mayor and Council Mayor M. Morden and Councillors Judy Dueck, Kiersten Duncan, Chelsea Meadus, Gordy Robson, Ryan Svendsen, and Ahmed Yousef, for their leadership Planning and Development Services staff Christine Carter, General Manager Planning & Development Services Charles Goddard, Director of Planning Lisa Zosiak, Manager of Community Planning Amanda Grochowich, Planner and Project Manager Rod Stott, Environmental Planner Mike Pym, Environmental Planner Engineering Services staff David Pollock, General Manager Engineering Services Rachel Ollenberger, Manager of Infrastructure Development Mark Halpin, Manager of Transportation Parks and Recreation Services staff Chad Neufeld, Manager of Parks Planning and Development Economic Development staff Wendy Dupley, Director of Economic Development The thirteen property owners of the Yennadon Lands Employment Park lands and and the residents of the Yennadon area, and other Maple Ridge community residents who helped shape these design guidelines These design guidelines were completed by the City of Maple Ridge in association with Michael von Hausen, FCIP, CSLA, LEED AP MVH Urban Planning & Design Inc. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • CONTENTS Design Guidelines Guide Overview.................................................................................................. 4 Purpose................................................................................................... 4 How to Use these Guidelines........................................................................ 4 1.0 Design Administration and Framework Policies 1.1 Intent and Use.......................................................................................... 5 1.2 Administration and Interpretation................................................................... 5 1.3 Development Permit Area Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.4 Site Location, Size and Characteristics .......................................................... 6 1.5 Watercourses and Natural Features............................................................ 7 1.6 Access and Transportation........................................................................... 9 1.7 Trails, Open Space, Parks and Recreation...................................................... 9 1.8 Stormwater Management... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.0 Employment Area Development Concept and Principles 2.1 Employment Area Development Concept . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 11 2.2 Guiding Principles..................................................................................... 12 3.0 Design Guidelines 3.1 General Guidelines: Site Planning Essentials 3.1 .1 Minimize site disturbance and enhance natural features.................... 13 3.1.2 Locate building and parking to minimize impact on natural areas......... 13 3.1.3 Locate buildings close to the streets with pedestrian access............... 13 3.1.4 Create adequate weather protection and passive solar gain.................... 13 3.1.5 Locate main employee parking to the side and rear of the site............ 13 3.1.6 Locate storage and loading to the side and year of the site................ 13 3.1.7 Manage stormwater on site .......................................................... 13 3.1.8 Create a landscaped strip at the front, rear and sides of site................. 13 3.2 Specific Guidelines and Standards 3.2.1 Overall site planning .................................................................. 14 3.2.2 Overall landscape plan............................................................... 14 3.2.3 Landscape strips and screens ...................................................... 15 3.2.4 Tree retention and replacement................................................... 16 3.2.5 Fencing................................................................................... 16 3.2.6 Street design standards and pedestrian connections........................ 17 3.2.7 Entrance gateways ................................................................... 18 3.2.8 Access and parking ................................................................... 19 3.2.9 Loading, service, storage and refuse............................................. 20 3.2.10 Building size and massing........................................................... 20 3.2.11 Building design and articulation .................................................... 21 3.2.12 Building materials and colour....................................................... 24 3.2.13 Crime prevention through environmental design.............................. 25 3.2.14 Signage and wayfinding............................................................ .. 25 3.2.15 Site Lighting............................................................................. 26 3.2.16 Landscape Requirements ................................................................. 26 YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • Design Guidelines Guide Overview Purpose These guidelines are specific to the Yennadon Lands Employment Park. They are unique in that they direct development in a neighbourhood sensitive and scaled manner so that the Employment Park is compatible with the adjoining residential neighbourhood. In the past, industrial areas have not always been good neighbours as they have brought consequences such as noise, visual impacts, and undesirable traffic to local areas. The City of Maple Ridge wants to prevent those negative consequences as much as possible. In the case of the Yennadon Lands Employment Park, the intention is to bring the right type and size of employment facilities into the neighbourhood, so it increases job opportunities close to home and provides opportunities for new and mature businesses to locate closer to where their employees live. This approach will help residents drive less, walk and bike more, and reduce the overall greenhouse gas footprint that longer commutes create. At the same time, as reducing commuting and providing space for businesses to grow, the City wants to provide pathways and trails, as well as other natural areas and tree conservation with any contemplated development in this new Employment Park. The scale, character and size of the buildings will also be carefully reviewed to ensure they fit into the valued west coast character of the neighbourhood. Sensitive site planning, landscape buffers, and screening will help these businesses integrate better with the surrounding established residential communities. Finally, access and traffic will be limited to the arterial roads in the area so that local streets are not impacted by the development to the extent possible. Property owners, developers, and consultants including architects, landscape architects and engineers will use these guidelines and the associated design review checklist to shape their development permit applications. City of Maple Ridge staff will measure the development permit applications submissions against the guidelines and checklist to suggest potential improvements. In the end, the City of Maple Ridge wants to make the development review and approvals process as clear and self-evident as possible to help reduce unnecessary delays and assure quality design . Most importantly, the City wants to create an outstanding and sought-after Yennadon Lands Employment Park: a local neighbourhood-sensitive employment area that all residents and businesses can be proud of as a progressive alternative to longer commutes. How to Use These Guidelines 1. A Development Permit Application will be completed that conforms to the City of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw requirements and other design standards, regulations, and bylaws including but not limited to the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw, the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw, the Strategic Transportation Plan, Tree Protection and Management Bylaw, Natural Features Development Permit Application, and the Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application. 2. The four sections that follow include: a. Section 1.0 Design Administration and Framework Policies b. Section 2.0 Employment Park Design Concept and Principles describes the approved overall site development concept and the accompanying principles that guide development; c. Section 3.0 contains the specific Design Guidelines that apply to individual development parcels; and d. Section 4.0 is a summary Design Review Checklist to ensure that applicants have covered all the guidelines adequately. 3. Following staff review, amendments will be required to the Development Permit Application as conditions for approval with the intention of improving the quality of site planning and design. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • 1.0 Design Administration and Framework Policies 1.1 Intent and Use 1.1 .1 These guidelines and associated design guideline checklist will be used to guide development of the Yennadon Lands Employment Park. They will be used by the City of Maple Ridge to review and evaluate Development Permit Applications. 1.1 .2 Applicants will respond to each guideline and checklist item that applies to their specific site in the context of the entire development area (see Section 4: Design Review Checklist). 1.2 Administration and Interpretation 1.2.1 The use of the term "City" shall mean "The City of Maple Ridge." 1.2.2 Where there is conflict with other bylaws, policies, or Area Plans adopted by the City, those bylaws, policies, or Area Plans will have priority over these guidelines. 1.2.3 Where a descriptive section, illustration, or photograph accompanies a guideline, it is provided for information purposes only to enhance the understanding of the guideline. 1.2.4 Where "shall" is used in the guideline, the guideline is considered mandatory. 1.2.5 Where "should" is used in a guideline, the intent is that the guideline is strongly encouraged, but can be varied where unique or unforeseen circumstances provide for courses of action that would satisfy or generally be seen as equivalent to the intent of the guideline. 1.2.6 Where the guideline requires submission of studies, analysis, or other information, the City of Maple Ridge shall determine the exact requirements and timing of the studies, analysis, or information. 1.2.7 Bylaws, policies, and regulations will be cross-referenced where possible in these guidelines, but it is up to the applicant to ensure that they comply with all applicable bylaws, policies, and regulations in accordance with the City of Maple Ridge's requirements whether or not they are mentioned in these guidelines. 1.3 Development Permit Area Application 1.3.1 In accordance with Section 488 of the Local Government Act, the City of Maple Ridge is permitted to designate Development Permit Areas to create special requirements for certain forms of development, including the form and character of intensive residential, commercial, industrial or multi-family residential development, and for the protection of natural features and ecologically significant land. 1.3.2 A Development Permit Area is intended to address special development circumstances, and if a property is within a Development Permit Area, certain types of development activity cannot proceed without a Development Permit being issued by Council. 1.3.3 An Industrial Development Permit is required for all new development within the urban area on lands designated industrial on Schedule B of the Official Community Plan other than in those circumstances indicated in in Section 8.4 Development Permit Exemptions. The following form and YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • character guidelines apply to industrial development on this unique neighbourhood site but are not necessarily appropriate for general industrial uses. 1.4 Site Location, Size and Characteristics 1.4.1 The Yennadon Lands Employment Park is 25.4 gross hectares (63 acres) in the north central part of the City of Maple Ridge . It is located on the south edge of 128 Avenue and the west edge of 232 Street. It is bordered by residential land uses on the south and west edges. Thirteen properties make up the Employment Area. The properties range in size from 0.5 hectares (1 .50 acres) up to 4 hectares (10.0 acres). 1.4.2 The west side of the Yennadon Lands Employment Park has newer urban residential homes on standard single-detached lots. On the southwest edge of the Employment Park, set back from Coho Creek, are clusters of townhomes. Along the south Employment Park of the site are older urban residential lots adjoining the south edge of Coho Creek. East of the Employment Park along 232 Street are large lot homes built on the Agricultural Land Reserve. North of the Employment Park on 128 Avenue are older estate lot homes. On the northeast corner of 232 Street and 128 Avenue is a Petro Canada Service Station and associated commercial uses. The Yennadon Elementary School is also located in behind the Service Station northeast of 128 Avenue and 232 Street. 1.4.3 The northern and western edges of the Employment Park have current large lot residential uses. One small farm is located in the northeast corner of the Employment Park. The balance of the site is vacant, treed, or open fields with Coho Creek and its tributaries running through the south and central part of the site. The open parts of the site have views north to the Golden Ears mountain peaks but much of the potential views are obscured by the existing forested area. The site is relatively flat but is punctuated by mounds and lower wet areas. Orthographic photo of site and adjoining uses YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • 1.5 Watercourses and Natural Features 1.5.1 In accordance with Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for all development and building within 50 meters of top-of-bank of all water features such as creeks, wetlands, ponds, or ditches, for the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Coho Creek and its tributaries run east to west and northeast to southwest through the site in the south and central part of the site. 1.5.2 Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit application shall be required for all development and subdivision to ensure the protection, restoration, and enhancement of the natural environment. 1.5.3 Outside of dedicated watercourse and natural feature protection areas, restrictive covenants shall be utilized to assist with protection of tree retention areas, and high risk natural hazard areas, where necessary. 1.5.4 Re-designation to a "Conservation" land use designation within the Official Community Plan shall be required through a future rezoning application. Summary site analysis and core Coho Creek Conservation Area 1.5.5 The City's Tree Protection and Management Bylaw will apply to the tree retention, removal, and replacement requirements for each development application as the majority of the site is covered with dense mixed forest of deciduous and coniferous trees . There are a few clusters of what appear to be significant Western Red Cedar and Hemlock tree stands near the west edge of the site. There YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • Seate: 1 :2,500 could also be further specimens, but a detailed tree inventory and management plan would be required to confirm their value and condition. 1.5.6 As per municipal requirements and legislative requirements of senior environmental agencies Coho Creek is fish-bearing and therefore requires a 30-meter setback with a 15-meter setback along the south side of the tributary where it abuts historical residential properties facing 126 Avenue on the east side of the site. The surrounding riparian corridor provides an important refuge to a variety of fish, wildlife and flora species and it provides an important wildlife movement corridor through the site. It helps provide greenway connections east and west and north to south as part of a larger watershed sub-catchment area. No buildings, impervious surfaces, infrastructure or site disturbance are permitted in this setback area. EZJ Protected Conservation Area ~ Potential Compensation Area [22:] Wildlife rv1ovement & Significant Tree Area CZ2] Integrated Water Management Area :. ':.":Potential Relocation and Selback SPEA Reduction OpJX)rtunities 1- Jj M-~"'"~'" '1] ~iHIH■ I , ' mapleridge.ca ~ J.1 FJLE:Enwt(r'lmtn~,tvMr-_).rn,d C.:..TE: M.ar ~1. :-02:.! 3Y: Oi Yennadon Lands Employment Park Environmental Sensitive Areas Protection and Management Concept 1.5.7 The Municipal Streamside Protection Regulation setbacks are determined with the assistance of a qualified environmental professional of record. Variances, relocations , or disturbance shall require input from senior environmental agencies. Wetlands and water management areas shall be evaluated by a qualified environmental professional along with the assistance of the Provincial WSA and the City. 1.5.8 Portions of these sensitive water management areas are potentially considered to be developable, but site designs must include consideration for integration of naturalized stormwater designs within these areas. Senior environmental agencies have noted a willingness to consider some development within the identified water management areas outside of protected headwater habitat YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • areas on condition there is a significant effort to retain contiguous headwater areas/wetland features and clusters of healthy trees around headwater areas. 1.5.9 There is a remnant central "island" of land in the south-central area of the site that may be considered for the east tributary stream compensation and a reduced setback to 22.5 meters for the balance of Coho Creek. A further environmental study shall be required to confirm the merit and feasibility of the various creek management and compensation options. 1.6 Access and Transportation 1.6.1 128 Avenue connects to the Golden Ears Bridge to the west and 232 Street connects south to Abernethy and Dewdney Trunk Road. Each of these roads will provide limited access to the site and no direct single-site access. Further road-widening dedication and improvements will be required as a condition of development and appropriate road standards for interior roads. 1.6.2 Transportation Impact Assessments are required through the development application process. 1.6.3 Where possible, innovative solutions to school related congestion issues will be considered. 1.6.4 Where feasible, developments are encouraged to align with the Transportation Demand Management Guidelines for Development in Metro Vancouver, as amended, in conjunction with the City's Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw and Zoning Bylaw, as amended . 1.7 Trails, Open space, Parks and Recreation 1.7.1 A gravel horse trail runs along the south side of 128 Avenue adjoining the site. There are some informal trails by residents on the western edge. There are regional and municipal plans for a comprehensive bike lane and walking path for both 128 Avenue and 232 Street in the future that will incorporate bike lanes and a sidewalk/trail network. A gravel horse trail is located along the south side of 128 Avenue and informal trails exist on the west edge of the site adjoining the residential area 1.7.2 A natural interconnected pathway and trail system is shown on the concept plan (Section 2.1) for the site that connects to the surrounding neighbourhoods. The trails should be slightly elevated to avoid flooding and may require elevated boardwalk sections in some of the riparian areas near the stream or in particularly low wet areas. In addition, should pedestrian bridges be required, these YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • bridges should be designed and constructed so that they create minimum disturbance in the riparian areas. 1.7.3 Where possible, trail and greenway development considered for the plan area will align and support the objectives identified in Regional Greenways 2050. 1.8 Stormwater Management 1.8.1 Any development shall demonstrate compliance with the City's stormwater management requ irements as outlined in the drainage section of the City's Design Criteria Manual and in accordance with Provincial and Metro Vancouver design standards. 1.8.2 Stormwater management strategies shall be coordinated with geotechnical recommendations, environmental protection areas, and tree retention plans as protected watercourses, surrounding wetland habitat, and water management areas will be the major recipient of seasonal groundwater and stormwater runoff. 1.8.3 Green infrastructure solutions must be incorporated into the stormwater management plan. 1.8.4 Water quality treatment for runoff from roads/parking areas is required before it enters into protected setback areas and into the more sensitive water management areas zones. 1.8.5 A bio-pond is required on at least each half of the Yennadon Lands (eastern portion and western portion) to provide for community detention and water quality treatment prior to discharge to the Coho Creek or existing municipal drainage system. 1.8.6 For fish-bearing water courses, any stormwater flow shall be filtered and scrubbed via biofiltration and exfiltration on developable portions of the site before it enters into protected sensitive areas. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 2.0 Employment Area Development Concept and Principles 2.1 Employment Area Development Concept 2.1.1 Complete Yennadon Lands Vision: Live, Work, and Play with Nature The intent is to create a complete neighbourhood where residents and business owners can live, work and play within a five to ten-minute walk or bicycle ride of their residence. This employment area should be uniquely smaller scaled to fit with the surrounding neighbourhood, offering the potential for a variety of smaller scaled buildings with limited building heights and sizes. Residential uses will be limited to potential work/live units in the west sector (see Development Concept Plan below). 2.1.2 Nature and Eco-Industrial Network Potential: The natural environmental area of the site will be conserved as the Coho Creek Conservation Area with the required 30 metre setback areas to buildings and trails along its edges. The employment area will be linked by trails and natural open spaces, which in turn will be connected to the adjoining communities. Businesses are also encouraged to form an Eco- industrial Network to minimize waste and optimize the "circular economy" where waste becomes a potential raw material for another local business. (see Eco-Industrial Park Handbook: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/ha ndle/10986/31456 and article; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007 /s 10098-016-1224-x) ?r1N?£!7f·· 1-__ _j__ __ -1k==:?@:2::::::::.:'.::=ff::::::~=="'=IJl-_=-'.:::'.-f't1 _ ='=~0=r(!.,-==~----------------· ....1./fli'_:_f.-!.!..'//11!.....·:::..b.:.._____. Yennadon Lands Employment Park Development Concept YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • 2.2 Guiding Principles 2.2.1 Suitable Mix of Employment Uses: The employment area will need to have an appropriate mix and size of employment uses to generate suitable levels of job creation while still affording a sensitive transition to the surrounding residential uses. 2.2.2 Neighbourhood Business Scale and Character: The design of the employment area will be limited to business activities inside the building to eliminate nuisance noise, odour, and other negative impacts. The building form will be more of a residential height and massing in the western area with generous landscape retention and reduced parking if possible. The eastern area may have larger and more conventional light industrial buildings. 2.2.3 Innovative Mixed Uses: The development of this site may include a mix of employment uses. 2.2.4 Environmental Sensitivity: Coho Creek will be dedicated to the City and protected and enhanced with the appropriate setbacks and a progressive stormwater management system on site. 2.2.5 Trail Network: A comprehensive trail network will connect to the adjoining communities and provide a rich amenity for both the businesses and residents to enjoy, promoting a healthy and walking/biking culture. 2.2.6 Resilience and Adaptability: This employment neighbourhood will be designed and planned so that there is diversity and choice of business parcels and units so they can adopt and consolidate or expand over time. 2.2.7 Climate-Change Responsive: The infrastructure and servicing will be designed for increased storm flows and special events. The intention is that each of the businesses will be part of a greater community that engenders environmental stewardship, economic prosperity, and social responsibility as core to their values. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • 3.0 Design Guidelines 3.1 General Guidelines: Site Planning Essentials The following are requirements for each Development Permit Application: vodir.ffl 'C,l't....-/ I'. -... . . ,· .. • •. _·. .-· l,IJLJ, . . • ~ Parking ta the side and rear af the building; visitor parking may be in front. I , .. . \l ~- 3.1.1 Minimize site disturbance and enhance natural features The site is sensitive to any alterations of the landscape, especially those areas adjoining Coho Creek. There shall be no disturbance within the stream setback area. Other areas with significant trees will be retained where possible and enhanced with native planting. 3.1 .2 Locate building and parking to minimize impact on natural areas Buildings and required parking shall be located outside the stream setback area. Additional parking or storage areas can be completed with pervious surfaces and surface storage to permit temporary retention, subsurface water recharge and reduce off-site erosion. Any trails or pathways should be located outside the stream setback area. 3.1.3 Locate buildings close to the streets with pedestrian access Since this area is intended to be pedestrian friendly and residential scale on the west portion of the site, buildings will be required to meet the minimum setback requirements unless visitor parking is proposed in the front yard setback. Direct pedestrian pathway access from the street and parking to the building will be required. 3.1.4 Create adequate building weather protection and passive solar gain Broad overhangs and other methods to protect the building and pedestrians shall be required as part of a genuine west coast approach to design of the buildings and landscape. 3.1.5 Locate main employee parking to the side and rear of the site Only visitor parking will be permitted in the front yard area . Other parking is required to be located in side yards or rear yards. 3.1.6 Locate storage, service and loading to the side and year of the site Storage, service and loading are required to be located to the sides or rear of the property to minimize potential conflicts with visitors and pedestrians as well as reduce undesirable visual impacts. 3.1. 7 Manage stormwater on site Rainwater management will be important so that Coho Creek will receive unpolluted water and nurture the local fish population. No excess runoff will be permitted from any site and will be retained on site in the event of a storm or other rain event in accordance with City of Maple Ridge Design Criteria Manual and environmental standards. The use of Green Infrastructure must be incorporated in to the site designs. 3.1.8 Create a landscaped strip at the front, rear and sides of site To buffer the visual intrusion of larger buildings, storage, and parking, a landscape strip will be required along the front yard, side yards and rear yard . The specifications for planting, width, and fencing are included in the Specific Guidelines that follow. Landscape design plans should be coordinated with the stormwater management plan to utilize vegetation to address retention, detention and water quality. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • ~ .•. ·~-_,,,,, __ -'I<"' 3.2 Specific Guidelines and Standards These guidelines generally follow the M7 Employment Park Industrial Zone requirements within the City of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 7600-2019 and may be more specific in some cases to attain the Yennadon Lands Employment Park Development Concept and Guiding Principles (Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of this document). 3.2.1 Overall Site Planning 3.2 .1.1 3.2.1.2 3.2.1 .3 3.2.1.4 The minimum development setback from Coho Creek is 30 metres. No buildings, improvements, or site disturbance are permitted in this setback area. The development setback area will be defined by the measurement from the top of bank of Coho Creek and require Natural Features and Watercourse Protection Development Permits. The undeveloped portion of the lot shall have all erosion and sediment control mitigation measures in place and be in compliance with the Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection Bylaw No. 6410-2006, or as amended. Developments are encouraged to incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) techniques into site planning. Applicants should consider employing techniques such as rain gardens, vegetated swales, separation of impervious surfaces, installing below surface infiltration beds and tree box filters, and redirecting water from drainpipes into vegetated areas. All landscaping areas shall meet or exceed the Metro Vancouver Regional District Stormwater Source Control Design Guidelines 2012, or as amended . 3.2.2 Overall Landscape Plan 3.2.2.1 3.2.2.2 3.2.2.3 3.2.2.4 A registered British Columbia Landscape Architect shall develop a Landscape Plan for each parcel. The landscape plan is to retain and enhance the natural settings as much as possible with no disturbance to the natural areas to be conserved outside the building sites. Landscape elements should follow an informal design and be understated. Landscaping on site shall provide definition to pedestrian corridors; adequate screening between sites; soften the transition between adjacent uses; and create interesting views and focal points in and to other parts of the overall employment area including the central natural area. Landscape design shall extend and complement the central natural area of the site and complement the adjoining residential development with natural plantings, accent planting, and specimen planting, where appropriate. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • Landscape for energy efficiency and conservation 3.2.2.5 3.2.2.6 3.2.2.7 3.2.2.8 3.2.2.9 The scale and location of plant material shall complement and be consistent with the scale and massing of the building(s) and the street trees. The Landscape Plan shall include vegetation and trees to be retained and protected during construction by distinct fencing (Section 3.2 .5). Site grading and excavation should retain topsoil on site and create the least site disturbance where possible. All final site grading must match adjoining, undisturbed natural grades and should be integrated with the stormwater master plan. The Landscape Plan should consider energy efficiency and conservation in the selection and placement of plants including the following: 3.2.2.9.1 Providing shade in the summer and light in the winter to the buildings through deciduous tree planting; 3.2.2.9.2 Allowing daylight to active building frontages; 3.2.2.9.3 Permitting natural drainage and ground-water recharge through the placement of planting and planting beds; and 3.2.2.9.4 Redirecting ra inwater from rooftop runoff into vegetated areas or rain barrels for later irrigation use. 3.2.3 Landscape Strips and Screens 3.0 metre landscape strip in the front yard and exterior side lot 3.0 metre landscape screen in the side and rear yards 3.2.3.1 3.2.3.2 3.2.3.3 3.2.3.4 3.2.3.5 A landscape strip is required at the property line along the street front and exterior side lot. Visitor parking is permitted in the front yard only in addition to pedestrian access to the building. A recommended selection of native trees, shrubs and groundcovers are recommended to cover at least 75 percent of the ground in this landscape strip area . The balance is recommended to be natural grasses or no-pesticide lawn grasses. Low shrubs (planted at 1.0 metre minimum on centre and trees at a maximum 7 metres on centre) should be planted to screen parked cars but allow visual access to the building for safety purposes. All planting on the property shall be native, water-conserving, herbaceous and/or woody plant species suitable for the City of Maple Ridge. A landscape screen is required in the side and rear yards and along any lot line edge where a trail is required. These buffer/screen strips shall be planted with native evergreen species and are to be continuous and solid adjoining residential uses. It is recommended that Building Owners and Tenants maintain the planting media and plant material in accordance with generally accepted landscape maintenance practices, and replacing each as necessary. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.2.4 Tree Retention and Replacement 3.2.4.1 3.2.4.2 3.2.4 .3 3.2.4.4 3.2.4.5 3.2.5 Fencing Chain-link fencing integrated with evergreen hedge 3.2.5.1 3.2.5.2 3.2.5.3 3.2.5.4 A tree survey is required by a certified arborist to determine recommendations for tree retention, removal and management in accordance with the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015. A Tree Management Plan should be developed as part of the required Landscape Plan to minimize disturbance on the site and reduce associated development costs in accordance with the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 .. If the tree plan is coordinated with storm water management, site grading, road layout, and building layout, site development costs should be reduced . Groups of trees should be retained to protect against potential isolated tree hazard situations. Associated vegetation at the base of trees should be retained to minimize disturbance of existing soil conditions. Trees on adjacent property must not be cut, pruned or have roots severed or disturbed during construction. Large tree roots encroaching on construction areas shall be left intact up to the foundation. Fill or any other material shall be kept well clear of existing trees. Foreign materials and substances should be prevented from entering or leaching into soils and definitely not be stored or placed in the tree protection areas. At the same time, root systems of retained trees shall be protected from compaction and grade changes. All trees identified for preservation shall be protected during construction unless it is otherwise demonstrated that they are a safety hazard or require removal to accommodate an approved bu ilding or structure in accordance with the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133- 2015. No fencing is permitted in the front yard and external side yard areas, except treatments like low decorative wood rail fencing as part of a coordinated landscape plan to a maximum of 1.2 metres. Fencing is limited to the internal side yards and rear yard areas and shall not exceed 3.6 metres. Fencing adjoining residential areas shall either be constructed with materials consistent with fence materials and design generally used in the residential neighbourhood or can be chain-link fencing if complemented by a solid evergreen hedge on the outside of the fence. Any fencing will meet the requirements of Section 403 -Visual Clearances at Intersections of the Zoning Bylaw. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • 3.2.6 Street design standards and pedestrian connections 3.2.6.1 3.2.6.2 3.2.6.3 3.2 .6.4 Collector standard roads are required in accordance with the Subdivision and Servicing Bylaw, as amended from time to time. There shall be a separate pedestrian sidewalk connection between the street and the front door of the building or buildings. It is required that a trail network as shown on the concept plan be provided along the Coho Creek setback area and through the development to connect up to the residential areas south and west of the site and with the proposed multi-use trail along 128 Avenue and 232 Street. Trail with 2.5 metre with and 250 mm shoulder A 5.0 metre dedicated public-right-of-way shall be required along the Coho Creek setback areas and between properties to permit an interconnected trail system and as an amenity to businesses and residents. 3.2.6.5 Standard trail/pathways include a 2.5 metre pathway with a 250 mm shoulder on both sides (see Figure 2 below). 2500mmwide W1dttt reduces in ESA I / I / 250 I / , / ' [ 2% cross slope to drain . /50/ /, , -~---,,,~~~~~"''''''~'""~~~-/_ ,✓ ,:j~~--.-.·,. ~~~·: .:,.·~ .• ~·-.->~. ·~;., . ~----, ... .._"', . ; .::. ' , ---..----•---:~4•--. - NOTES: \ • Each lift of roadbase shall be compacted to refusal \ with vibratory roller (min. 120 type) , • Longitudal slope shall be max.12%. Slopes up to max \ 15% may be accepted with prior City approval. -Provide culverts every 20m or as required. -Culverts and swales to direct water to natural drainages. -Trail layout to avoid significant trees and root zones. -Trail layout to be approved by City representative. -Confirm trail width in ESA areas with City representative prior to construction Figure 2: PARKSIDE TRAIL Standard Detail City of Maple Ridge standard cross-section for trails 10mm gravel screenings 75mm(min) depth 250mm(min) shoulder TYP. 75mm roadbase 150mm(min) depth Finished grade adjacent to trail shall be 50mm below trail w/ all adjacent native or existing planting restored to approval by CMR Parks Nilex 4545 non-woven geotextile to extend 150mm past edge of trail Drainage swale and 0150mm culverts as required along uphill side of sloping site conditions undisturbed native subgrade w/ compaction of 95% SPD or 75mm pitrun to ensure firm load bearing subgrade compacted to 95% SPD •. f ilrf•Mjj PARKSIDE TRAIL STANDARD DETAIL u. _,, ....... _,,, __ ._, .... ~ .. -... ~ ......... ---·-------... -~. --~,-.. ., __ . _ ___ .. ,_.,...., __ _ YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • 3.2. 7 Entrance Gateways 3.2.7.1 3.2.7.2 3.2 .7.3 Entrance gateways shall be located at the entrance of the Employment Park at 128 Avenue and at the entrance to the east section on 232 Street. Gateways are to be set on private property. The gateways shall set and reflect the character of the employment areas and create a distinct recognition of entrance into an employment area through entrance signage and a potential special paving treatment. Materials used in their natural state are encouraged such as stone and wood. The entrance gateways are to be neighbourhood scale and using natural materials combined with native landscaping YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • 3.2.8 Access and Parking Visitor parking only in the front yard setback area Pedestrian access from street to front entrance of building 3.2 .8.1 3.2.8.2 3.2.8.3 3.2.8.4 3.2.8.5 3.2.8.6 3.2.8.7 3.2.8.8 Generally, only one access per property is permitted . Access may be shared with adjoining uses to minimize driveway along the street, but will need to be reviewed on a case by case basis. Additional access widths may be required . Only visitor parking is permitted in the front yard or external side yard areas. All other parking is required to be on the interior side yards or the rear yard areas. Locate disabled parking spaces near the front door of the building, providing ramp or other universal design access. All non-vehicular routes shall meet City of Maple Ridge Accessibility Standards and be fully accessible. Sidewalks and paved pathways shall be wide enough for wheelchairs or scooters and should include a tactile strip for the visually impaired. Curb cuts and curb let-downs shall be provided in appropriate locations to facilitate safe, convenient, and direct access from parking spaces to buildings for people with disabilities. Parking areas shall be divided into smaller sections by planting trees every six parking stalls with shrubs and groundcover to break up and green the parking areas. Parking areas shall be graded to direct runoff to the landscaped areas as part of the site's stormwater management plans. A distinct pedestrian pathway connection shall be provided between the parking area and the main building where there are multiple layers of parking. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • 3.2.9 Loading, service, storage and refuse Loading and service bays to the side and rear of the building Screening of service and loading areas 3.2.9.1 3.2.9.2 3.2.9.3 3.2.9.4 3.2.9.5 3.2.9.6 Loading and service bays shall be located to the side and rear of the building with access to the side of the building. Loading and service bays shall be screened from adjoining properties. No storage materials shall exceed the height of the fencing and screening. Ensure construction waste is recycled where feasible. A comprehensive waste reduction program is encouraged among landowners that can provide recycling and reuse in close proximity of industrial and commercial owners and/or tenants. Refuse receptacles shall be located indoors or within service areas out of view from pedestrian access. Garbage and waste material should be stored in containers that are weather-proof and animal resistant in accordance with Waste Management Guidelines. 3.2.10 Building size and massing Buildings shall be scaled appropriately and front the street 3.2.10.1 The front of the building will face the street. 3.2.10.2 It is recommended that the front of the building be articulated with wall divisions, building setbacks/protrusions or punched windows to break up long wall surfaces and create interest and scale along the street front. 3.2.10.3 The front reception and offices could be lower than the back of house warehouse and storage areas to create pedestrian scale and interest along the street. 3.2.10.4 Ancillary or accessory buildings, including structures used for storing materials or refuse containers should be visually screened from public streets with dense evergreen planting or should be designed and finished in a manner consistent and harmonious with the principal building. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • The overall concept is to create a green campus of buildings that scale with the neighbourhood. 3.2.11 Building design and articulation West coast architecture with wood, glass, and steel 3.2.11 .1 Compatible architecture is encouraged -a range of styles, scale, massing, articulation, and glazing suitable for light industrial buildings with a west coast flair by using wood and steel accents where appropriate. 3.2.11.2 Broad overhangs for weather protection of both building and pedestrians shall be considered . 3.2.11 .3 Offices, reception, sales, and other public use areas shall be located at the front of the buildings and face the adjoining street. 3.2.11.4 Main entry areas should be highly articulated with at least 50 percent glazing and a distinct front door design and broad overhangs in roof structure and details. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES No blank walls; walls with texture, glazing, and colours Each building shall have an employee amenity area 3.2.11.5 Design should incorporate wild-life and bird friendly design. Elements could include: 3.2.11 .5.1 3.2.11 .5.2 3.2.11.5.3 3.2.11.5.4 Apply visual markers to the exterior of glass surfaces. Interrupt reflective glass by increasing the density of external visual markers and/or include adapted fenestration patterns, external blinds, shutters, sunshades, grilles, louvers, or artwork. Design corner windows, glass walkways, glass railings and other similar features to reduce the appearance of clear passage to sky or vegetation. Dampen reflections by using canopies or sunshades to cover windows at ground level and/or by using screens, drapes or blinds to increase the opacity of clear glass. 3.2.11 .6 Building shall have no blank walls. Where there are major extents of wall surfaces, glazing, texture, graphics, and colours provide visual interest and break up the massive surface. 3.2.11 .7 Mechanical elements on building roofs shall be screened with appropriate materials that blend in with the building design. 3.2.11 .8 Natural lighting and ventilation should be maximized where possible by creating windows oriented to sunlight and operable windows for natural ventilation. 3.2.11.9 Energy efficient fixtures, programmable thermostats and lighting are recommended to reduce energy demand and minimize operating costs. 3.2.11.10 The installation of green roofs are supported, where possible and appropriate, providing the owner of the building maintains the roof planting media and plant material in accordance with generally accepted green roof maintenance practices, replacing each as necessary. 3.2.11 .11 Each site shall have an employee amenity area for the common use of employees and visitors that could include a simple sitting area with shelter. 3.2.11 .12 Main building entries should be clearly identifiable from the street or entry driveway. 3.2.11.13 Renewable energy features should be considered, such as solar and geothermal energy where feasible. 3.2.11 .14 Locate building ventilation systems to mIn1mIze noise and exhaust on pedestrian areas, adjacent residential development, and outdoor spaces. 3.2.11.15 Bicycle racks and bicycle storage for employees is required to advance bicycling to work. Bicycle parking should be visible, in well-lit areas and the YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • bicycle racks should be of theft-resistant materials, securely anchored to the ground. In addition, showers and lockers are encouraged. 3.2.11.16 Main building entries should provide generous weather protection that is designed to be an integral feature of the building's architectural character. 3.2.11 .17 Larger sites that are developed with more than one building should provide a weather protected walkway system to connect building entries within the site, and coordinated with adjacent sites if possible. 3.2.11.18 Canopy and/or awning systems detailing should consider integrated signage, lighting, and display systems. 3.2.11.19 Canopy and awning systems depth should be maximized to provide greater weather protection , as well as reduce the scale impact of larger buildings. 3.2.11 .20 Weather protection elements on overhangs may be considered in required yards and landscaped setbacks. 3.2.11 .21 Ground-oriented pedestrian "streets" through large footprint buildings are encouraged to create connections to on-site circulation routes and amenities, consistent with a campus-like high-tech environment. Such circulation through buildings should be clearly identified and designed for use by the public. •$/ieihw/ine-, ~ ~ bMt~ df:,,~'l</" <> .8~1< VP T~'!!_80X-!G>u,'ld:!!:!f ~c.vb-hon • t • ~ -----~ ✓-·--' ,, ·.'. • f;u,fb/)'Jq ~r~ lo./d , wea~ pr~77PTV' • a'etrYJi-ff 47'J/" ~ .Mrff/(½. • frt:t,7Js~0 1:3/W//Ja0WS -<> Wl=ATH;=R. ~77c:J/4./ i ~~ ~£-IE. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • 3.2 .12 Building materials and colour Wood, stone, steel, and glass should be elemental to design 3.2.12.1 Wood, stone, and glass should be elemental to the buildings and building clusters to emphasize the west coast locale and contemporary design. 3.2.12.2 Materials like vinyl , aluminum siding, and brick facing are not preferred or should be only a portion of the building materials. Accents in wood and stone are recommended . 3.2.12.3 Exposed concrete shall be sandblasted or clad in split faced granite or similar material. 3.2.12.4 Construction materials should consider recycled content where possible. 3.2.12.5 Clear or muted colours, used with stains, or earth tone-coloured materials are recommended; accent colours shall be permitted on special building elements such as trim and around the entrance ways. The building materials should help reduce the volume and scale of the buildings to help them fit better into the Yennadon neighbourhood. YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • 3.2.13 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design 3.2.13.1 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles shall be incorporated into site planning and building design by ensuring convenient, safe and identifiable access routes to building entrances, and other principal areas of the site and buildings. 3.2.13.2 Design the site and building so that there is natural surveillance, allowing people to easily view what is happening around them from the parking lots, entrance areas, storage areas and loading bays . Entries and walkways should be highly visible and well-lit with minimum hidden or blind corners. 3.2.14 Signage and wayfinding Signage should complement building design and placement 3.2.14.1 All signage shall conform with the City of Maple Ridge Sign Bylaw. 3.2.14.2 Signage design, materials and message boards should be integrated and complement the scale, colours and materials of the building. 3.2.14.3 In multi-tenant buildings, signs shall be designed to present a unified appearance using a single sign at the entrance and separate signs in a consistent sign strip along the mid-part of the building/buildings. 3.2.14.4 Entrance signs to the site should be ground-mounted and simple in character to display the street number and name of the complex. 3.2.14.5 Entrance signage to the site shall be monument based and shall be combined with landscape design to integrate the sign into the site planning and design. 3.2.14.6 Only one individual tenant sign is permitted in a coordinated sign strip area. Smaller monumental entrance signage using building materials and west coast look complements a local neighbourhood landscape YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.2.15 Site Lighting 3.2.15.1 Lighting shall be designed following a 'dark sky policy' with direct lighting only (full-cut-off) so lighting is directed and there is minimum off-site impacts especially on adjacent residential neighbourhoods. 3.2.15.2 Even within the development discreet front entrance lighting and other visitor parking lighting is lower pedestrian scale (LED energy efficient lighting and directed and complements the adjoining street lighting). 3.2.15.3 Security lighting is directed and does not flood-off site. 3.2.15.4 Other accent lighting including up-lighting for the entrance signage, pedestrian pathway lighting, and specimen trees is acceptable and encouraged as part of a unified landscape and building lighting plan. 3.2.15.5 Sidewalk lighting will be coordinated with the street design. 3.2.16 Landscape Requirements 3.2.16.1 All landscape methods and materials should meet current BCSLA/BCNT A Landscape Standards. 3.2.16.2 Native British Columbia species should be maximized. Any supplemental planting should be compatible in variety and size. 3.2.16.3 Reference the Watercourse and Natural Features Development Permit and/or the Urban Tree List for Metro Vancouver in a Changing Climate for a lists of potential native landscape plant list. 3.2.16.4 Minimize cultivated, decorative, and non-indigenous plants and lawns. Naturalized landscapes should be the general approach to reduce maintenance, enhance wildlife, and water use. 3.2.16.5 Tall tree species should be located to minimize impact on views from neighbouring properties. 3.2.16.6 All trees shall be provided with a sufficient depth of soil volume to meet or exceed a total of 1 0m3 of soil volume per new tree planted. Diversity of native plant materials that grow well in local site conditions is important to the health and growth of the site landscaping YENNADON LANDS EMPLOYMENT PARK DESIGN GUIDELINES • CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7735-2021 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 APPENDIX B WHEREAS Section 4 77 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "B" and Schedule "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7735-2021." 2. To amend the Urban Area Boundary, as shown in Schedule 1 Map No. 1037, to include the Yennadon Lands in their entirety. 3. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Parcel A, Lot 8, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster Land District, REF PL 8148; Lot 7, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Lot 6, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Lot 5, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Lot 3, Plan NWP5430, Sublot 1, Part NE1/4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District, Except Plan PARCEL "A" RP22408, P23424; Lot 4, Plan NWP5430, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District, Except Plan 23424, LMP12700; Lot 2, Plan NWP22339, Part NE1/4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Lot 46, Plan NWP31436, Part NE1/4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Lot 55, Plan NWP40879, Part NE1/4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Lot 56, Plan NWP40879, Part NE1/4, Section 20, Township 12, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; Parcel B, Lot 8, Plan NWP5467, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster Land District, (REF PL 13094); and and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1038 and 1039, a copy of which is attached hereto as Schedule 2 and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby re-designated to Industrial (Employment Park Category) and Conservation. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 11th day of May, 2021. READ a second time as amended the 12th day of April, 2022. PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of May, 2022. READ a third time the 24th day of May, 2022. ADOPTED, the day of , 202X. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. Purpose: MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia 7735-2021 1037 To Amend the Urban Area Boundary as shown --Remove Existing Boundary • ---Add Proposed Boundary ~ N SCALE 1:6,500 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: 7735-2021 1038 Agricultural To: ~ Industrial [_] Conservation MAPLE RIDGE Urban Area Boundary British Columbia ~ N SCALE 1:6,500 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. Purpose: From: To: MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia 7735-2021 1039 To Amend Schedule C as shown D To Add To Conservation Urban Area Boundary ~ N SCALE 1 :6,500 9 Maple RidQe - TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Dan Ruimy and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Demolition Requirement for In-Stream Rezoning Applications EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: July 16, 2024 2024-152-RZ cow In the fall of 2023, the BC government passed Bill 44 to amend the Local Government Act to allow for a wider range of housing options within municipalities. In response, the City amended its Zoning Bylaw to include provisions to allow Small Scale Multi-Unit Housing (SSMUH) There are 16 in-stream applications affected by the SSMUH legislation that have received first reading, each accompanied by a set of conditions to be met before the bylaw can be adopted. One of these conditions requires the demolition of the existing house on the subject property prior to bylaw adoption. To streamline the rezoning process for lands governed by SSMUH legislation, staff are requesting council authority to waive this demolition requirement, except in cases where the property is actively in violation of unsightly or nuisance property bylaws. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. The Council authorizes the Director of Planning to waive the rezoning requirement for removing existing dwellings before the adoption of the rezoning bylaw for the 16 in-stream applications, as of July 2, 2024, affected by the SSMUH legislation, except in cases where the subject property is actively violating bylaws or is deemed unsightly or a nuisance DISCUSSION: 1. Existing Dwellings on Properties Being Rezoned to the RT-1 and RT-2 Zones As of July 2, there were 16 in-stream rezoning applications within the City to rezone to the RT-1 zone for duplexes and RT-2 zone for triplexes. With the adoption of SSMUH housing provisions into Zoning Bylaw 7600-2019, these 16 properties may be eligible for building permits for duplexes and triplexes without needing to continue their current rezoning applications. Since the demolition of an existing dwelling is required as a condition of these rezonings, owners may be incentivized to opt for building permits under the new SSMUH zoning provisions rather than continue with the rezoning process. To address this, staff is recommending that the condition to demolish existing single-family dwellings be waived except where the property is actively violating unsightly or nuisance bylaws. This approach provides several benefits: • Renters can remain in their homes until its is necessary for new duplex or triplex construction. Page 1 of 3 • Reduces the likelihood of vacant lots if new construction is delayed. • Allows the property owners to generate additional income until they are ready to start construction of the new duplex or triplex. • Provides an incentive to continue with a rezoning application to the RT-1 and RT-2 zones with community amenity contribution and other conditions with the rezoning application. The review of the suitability of maintaining existing dwellings will be based on City Bylaw staff requiring the rezoning condition to be maintained if there are outstanding contraventions of City bylaws as noted above. City Bylaw enforcement will continue if an existing dwelling should become an issue in the future. Any existing dwelling can become a concern whether it is subject to a rezoning application or being considered for future removal under the SSMUH zoning bylaw provisions. Once the lots are rezoned, existing single-family dwellings would become legal non-conforming (grandfathered) under the Local Government Act. Given the above, staff recommends the following for the 16 in-stream rezoning applications: • For applications that have received third reading, the demolition condition for the existing dwelling may be waived, subject to review of bylaw enforcement status and a report to Council at the time of consideration of adoption of each zoning amendment. • For applications that have not received third reading, the demolition condition should be included with a statement that staff will review the bylaw enforcement status to determine if this existing dwelling may be maintained at time of consideration of adoption of each zoning bylaw amendment. 3.0 STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT: The proposed implementation measures discussed in this report align with the strategic objectives outlined in the 2023-2026 City of Maple Ridge Strategic Plan . Page 2 of 3 Page 1 of 1 CONCLUSION: To support the implementation of SSMUH housing, staff recommend waiving the requirement for demolishing existing homes for the 16 in-stream rezoning applications affected by the SSMUH legislation as long as there are no active violations of unsightly or nuisance property bylaws. “Original Signed by Mark McMullen” Prepared by: Mark McMullen Grochowich, MCIP, RPP Manager of Development & Environmental Services “Original Signed by Marlene Best” Approved by: Marlene Best, RPP, MBA Interim Director of Planning “O “Original Signed by Scott Hartman” Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer ~ Maple Ridee ~ TO: FROM: SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Dan Ruimy and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Development Variance Permit 11300 Pazarena Place EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: July 16, 2024 FILE NO: 2024-155-VP MEETING: cow A Development Variance Permit application (2024-155-VP) has been received to install a fence for a daycare play area associated with the the commercial/residential building nearing completion located at 11300 Pazarena Place in the Provenance community. The property is zoned C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) Zone. The requested variance is to allow for a clear fence to be mounted to the perimeter building wall, together measuring 2.44 meters in height. Because this play area is on a portion of top of the parking structure for the subject building, Provincial regulations require this fence be higher for safety in the daycare's child play area. The variance is to: • Allow the fence height along the front line toward Lougheed Highway to be increased from 1.2 meters to 2.44 metres; and • Allow the fence height along the side lot lot line toward the Conservation Area and the rear lot line toward the amenity clubhouse and pathway to be increased from 2.0 meters to 2.44 metres. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2024-155-VP be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2024-155-VP respecting property located at 11300 Pazarena Place. 2024-155-VP Page 1 of 4 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Within Urban Area Boundary: Area Plan: OCP Major Corridor: Zoning: Existing: Proposed : Surrounding Uses: North: South: East: West: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: 2024-155-VP Polygon Provenance Homes Ltd Lot C District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan EPP79514 Commercial Commercial Yes Not applicable Yes Commercial C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) Use: Zone: Townhouses and Open Space RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) and R-3 (Single Detached Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Rural Residential) Urban Residential and Conservation Townhouses and Open Space RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) and R-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) Urban Residential and Conservation Open Space R-3 (Single Detached Rural Residential) Conservation Townhouses RM-1 (Low Density Townhouse Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Commercial and Rental Apartments Commercial and Rental Apartments 0.238 ha (0.59 acres) Pazarena Place Page 2 of 4 Servicing Requirement: Flood Plain: Fraser Sewer Area: Concurrent or Previous Applications: b) Project Description: Urban Standard No Yes 2015-297-RZ The proposal for the property located at 11300 Pazarena Place (see Appendices B and C) is to grant a height variance to install a fence required by the Provincial Daycare Regulation, along a wall at the perimeter of the roof structure for a daycare child play area. A 2.44 metre fence is required, which is greater than the 1.2 metre maximum fence height at the front lot line and the 2.0 metre maximum fence height for areas other than the front lot line for commercially zoned properties (see plans in Appendix C). c} Variance Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for developments. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process, including instances where Provincial Regulations have different standards to be attained. The following requested variance is supported for safety reasons and minimal visual impact of the fence: 1. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No 7600-2079, Part 4, Section 405.4 Fence Requirements in Commercial Zones, Subsection 3 a: To vary the maximum permitted height from not exceeding 1.2 metres on any portion of a lot (other than a rear yard) and from 2.0 metres to the rear of the building front, to 2.44 metres. The proposed fence along the front parcel line facing Lougheed Highway (East) and the fence along the side lot line facing the Conservation Area (South) are proposed to be increased from 1.2 meters to 2.44 metres. The rear lot line facing toward the amenity clubhouse and pathway (West) are proposed to be increased from 2.0 meters to 2.44 metres (see Appendix C). 2024-155-VP Page 3 of 4 CONCLUSION: The proposed fence variance is supported for safety reasons, the fence site location and visually unobtrusive design of the fence. It is therefore recommended that this application be considered for isaunce and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Development Variance Permit 2024-155-DVP. "Original Signed by Mark McMullen" for "Original Signed by Marlene Best" Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP Reviewed by: Marlene Best, RPP, MBA Planner "Original Signed by Scott Hartman" Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -Subject Map Appendix B -Ortho Map Appendix C -Site Plan and Plans Showing Fence with Variance Appendix D -Draft Development Variance Permit No. 2024-155-VP 2024-155-VP Interim Director of Planning Page 4 of 4 N Scale: 1 :2,000 Legend 1111 Park Urban Residential 1111 Commercial Institutional Conservation APPENDIX A 11300 PAZARENA PLACE LAND USE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 11341 11337 11331 11325 11319 11311 11305 11299 13 11291 11283 11277 ,_ rn ~ Maple Ridee ~ FILE: 2024-155-VP DATE: Jun 19, 2024 BY: DM APPENDIX B 11300 PAZARENA PLACE ORTHO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ Maple Ridee ~ FILE: 2024-155-VP DATE: Jun 19, 2024 BY: DM C..) >< 0 z LU Q. Q. o:::( •;10,,~ .. 1:u•(-< ilRIICTUIUlC<:HCRUE lllOIOUUOUJ.)olw•u ~•,~~~i';~~~c•rn ~~-,~~~~ ~~~~=~:f ~~~:;1~01:,~~~.~~ISH ~• ... ~~~~![RICIO WAL< COIICUIEllCC~ w,,a.,11t•10• 1:~~i·~w~cmt $Wlt10CO!IOIOOII ,.., OEltlSMlPUTIIICIN- ~+- ) i ,.,, iii~i~;~-@) ,,·,, ATIIC'IU ··1·~·~·"'""' 1NTEU:,o,um~s-s1mnues "''• ~~Y~K\;~~~~~:lH ,,·,1i;~:t•ll,Y.OOO ,,.,, I ~:!~~~~mi:/~ o ~ • .,.,,. ,1r1,n Coll ,..,., ~ ...... . ..... u ... , ... , ........ . .... , ....... .,.,. .... ~ ...... -t> .. ,,,.,.,~. ,,,. """""~""''" .. ... .... ,. ... ~'""·-~·· ,.,.. .. .,,, .... ,, .... h"<' .. , ·~ ·~, ....... ..., ......... , ::.,;i·;:~:-·"'"' I •. ---,,, ...---.1··-~Qjr .-I , I I· I • ! 11• _;,1 ~ .. ~ -~ .1,..].03 .:::· :::\:':._ r I I , ... • t @ . ;}).-~>~ : <e'-<,, ~c ,~=®= (;_;_ ·I I .. r _c <if 6r@ ' ,A·l0.05/t 0 @ -,-~@----! ~' ~-: --...... ,. I\ ) ~ ARCHITECTS INCO~~P, ''"-I .•.. ,,, ..... " '"""' ''<. ~ @ • '·"--,_ (5 I I ---. , 2 ~ ti ---~-~-1.? I ,I,_(-' F I ' /~ ·-~-.. :01 " I --~-, --•,.._ ', ) I • , ,' y • , I -----, , ' , l , ' ,, X I--_ ----1 1 I ______ j ,;;;--ff I ~--, ' I.;;;-, ' , ~ ~ @_ (ii) '' "" ----· -· ,,, ' "' "'o/ , 'I ' ,_ ----~. '·f I 2f ___ tff ~ f' !?-" ~ / 1-, I P ~ ~-~7 ..,. i.:'.'.'!,%;!.,Q, < 0 " , I, , ... .,... ' / .~, · . , '• ~:i:,!i1 .. ~ .. \ I 'C -~ \( • £le, ·' ' ' , •-=•--, , ,· ,., -" -~ •, -.. ,.,,_ ' ' ,S:,::., .. ~ •• '•,/ _ ' •, , j\ '~;!i.~~!\1:/c~o111\1:t~n • '-••• ..J.,.;_./ ,.. I \_ '""'°" '',:)::~.:?'' A .\ /-... ~ ~ C ~-l,02 :.~~I.NT . ,T~IAFT ~':=GAP, ,UlREO) 4 ~15.02) l \:'"' , • ~~~~~ LAW ' !J Lit-a: OF Fl.DOR ADOVe Amenity Patio I 'l GLAZING OayCare 0 P8tio '----""'""""'""'""""' , I FROM A "p''·R' OVENANCE • ..-v-.-.--.A:.,~...,,.-.~..,....,.--.,....,......,.~........---...... .,...,.~ I I FINIS / ,,ef"U6"(2.44m) HIGH METAL FE:::JNCING i , . '"" / /~ LOT C .-:;,>=-,7 C/W CLEAR GLAZING FROM PATIO : / i / / (/ 1 CM,Add,on -i-~•,z_=_t FINISH GRADE I ..-J~~/~ I '"}f'i I ' 11300Pou,o~Pl•oo ~ • • ,,/ 1 1 M,pl,Re9,,ec ;[ ,, '~"' -"-:c.~'k.'7:"='"'~:~::'.T......,__,~ I , 6' (1.83m) , •, , .' .' ;;/~~~:;::• • .;..: ,. •• ;,•:,:sc--.....;:c_---S.,., -, HE / loi.40,.od403G,o,p1 ---::-}--,,,,;11\\~ ~¥'---,~-> I ,...:::uxo"",.,,_.,_,,,,,;;._)0 "'9"'"" ;w. / / , . •wo"""""'"' ,\'IW' ------":..--:..--:..--:..--,., I' ----....: -. > ' .. "---I ~O:""!';•·,.,.,,.,.. ""'"' / , I --2,, ~,_;----c...--c...--c...--:_-_ 'f!'t11H· --,,~--I 0' ,, 0;t--I..,/.---~---~-i '•--n ---~---------,~-r;--c...--c...--:_-_ '°'}) --."'t-. ,;/'._ : 1•,7,"'"o"-7"" I /I ".,.,. ,U .. L-->" _: ,;;, ,,---:..•:..--:..-;;.-I . /!/ .//' I I ~~l •• ~ 4 • ----/ t'' ··V I 'i' ASI 98 01 "'••¾,·'• ~--,a• ~ ,v,vv ,vv»v"v,v vnvnv l ~ / ,;i/ ///i / , 1 f ;, -o l ;;~CA~E 8' (2 44;.;;) HIGH FENCE i -, • / ,{ (1;/ / l l ~ \,, 1 ·,11,,.-•• -__.ny 11L~, ---...:.::_,. • ----:..--:..-~_£ ~\,'I; ; -. 1-_-_• J,:·. Z, __ -__ ..:.,_ ____ . __ -7 --r ,._.· ,ii,::::,.-,.,, 9j ;h ~ .. ~~·~ ······~ ·'~i©l llil ~ lG@lffi m® ~(C;Olfili /If' 0 lill ~·!@©~· 1 ' A-2 . 0 2 .I ii 1 !5.00iiu i _ Roof Mid Pojo ~ EL 411:lm I I I ii ~I I I I t I I I I I L - I I. Ceiling : -~L.,~!>-lm r-- ' I : • I l ::~~;~ Ts r~~~-- ·r ~Ln~~~~ar I i --:;;~~~11 EX I ,/.--.--.yyyy~y-..,.- Parkin~ P2 cp ~~G/Hr\lHi--SIDEK,l,LI:: I I I ~ .I I ii i' ils, ~ I 'I 21·-o· (6--:.co;;,f ~ ·1· Roof Mid Pain I "'"~ ------------~: _ Ceiling l ____________ : ! : U Y15'1<n 1 1 ~ 3,d Flom Corner Plaza --~ 1 ' ia k -------------1 I, _ 12ncl Floor , EL.;M~1m , I, I I I ;: I I I ' --7 Parkinq P1 I Flashing_s Colour: Roof Fascia: Siding: Horizon/al HardteColourArct1cWh1te S1d1i1g: Horizon/al Hard1eColourNighlGr.1y Siding: Ver/lea/ (BIAlfd & Barren) Siding: Sh1i1gfe H,udieCoklurNightGruy Pol.irWhi!e Charcoal Windows: Vinyl While Frames V.4i?dows: 14i,yl BlackFmmes Stone Veneer Polar White I Nole: Cascad1a Standard Colors ~ Ch.ircoill Iv i D) lE)(G) (H Charcoal I "1 ~I ~:i !1, ll •I $ \: ~::~:~ati~; 0 -Along Lougheed Highway ~~~~~~~:~~] I f-"-'"'""---, -----:------------- , I ::,::::'P2 i i @ ~ (01 I I :: :::: i I West Elevation -Along Pedestrian Pathway GrI1'JCl) ~T Material Legend -Lowrise 0 i:s0::i Membra11e c/W Granular C<1p Sheet IKO C.,mt,1i,~J" 011,1\ Gr~y 0 ~~:-~1asc1a Board. 2~6· on 2~10 Colour:Arct,cWht\e 0 ~:~:~-:.~~~~~~ Kayc1mColour.White 0 !~:~·:;~~::: Kayc;m Colour White <&> i~:~~~Solflt Dark Colour. H<1rd1e Colour Night Gr<1y 0 ~;~~;;·l~:o:;~~~;~~. Cedarmdl re~posu1epa11em. Light Colour. Hardie Colour Arcl,c WMe <S> ~:::u~!~:11~~ri:~1~~:;r:9,: 1 s~ 1 ;';rs ~ Siding: Hardie Panel yDmkerGreyColor M Siding:Verrical ~Board&Balten. Hardmpanel.Cedarm1I\ Ru~t,c Grrnn Ba!!cnBoard 2.5 B.i1ten8oardon1opo!•l8'widepa11&l ~~ 12 c-c ~pac,ng Colourmalch&d\Jims&screwfasteners Ligl1I Colour. H(l1d1e Colour Aict,c Whit& ~ i:t1!oi:U~"ifr~~e Colour Night Gray 0 ~;:i~:~!~s ~!~rte Frnn,es and <S> ~~~:l~~~:~d S Law-e 0 :~~~::ia~[!~!~~~::rame OoubleGlazed&Low-e 0 ~~~~':a/ ~~~~s1~!~eer Provider,ceQuarryledgestom; <§> ~~~:~s.-~~!reens. Gutters DownspoutsatOarkC!add1ng ColoumdtomatchGm1tekSla1e 0> ~~~::~r::~~1i.~~:;:: Pajn\ed Colou1ed to ma1ch Stare-Fran\ Window ► ~ <& ~~:~~;:bed Tnm~ TomalCh<1dJ<1Ce11tCladd1ngcolour 0i;::::~:~~:t;~~~::i~~ncric Pain! BM AC·26 Oza1k Shadows ~ g:~~~~~::·~~~ !~:!:~;;d~ua(dS 0 ~~~: !e:::: Trims Cladding Frostadglassillprivacyscreens TomalchadJacenlCladd<ngcolour Fr.inui Colour malch Gemek Slat!! .0,o,ide samples of all cxr&ior co/ou,s l mar&<ia/s /a, 1,w,eN [E~®\YlcillU~@[n] D lEcill~U @ \Wl@~U A,RCHIIECTS INCORf'C\RATED bllll~lorBd.J:19Ptrm1 MfOlltn.2il21 Ht-lll~!atltr<ler t~",;~-r~~f!n,uu:1.:n ~~~~~: t.%~ OP AlfltlrJr~nt ~:'.~~~~i~fan1uu:1-.n ;::~1;2{!•j3cin1u~1~n PROVENANCE LOT C 11300Paz1mmaPlace Mapl .. Rldg .. ,B.c. l•galAddr•n: LolCOl,lrlcl Lob402arid403Group1 NWD Plan EPP79514 A111129.2t'22 ASl-98.02 A-4.01 Roof Mid Pain I:~ !I ;: "' Ceiling EL.3'C54m 31d Floor ~-I ~· UJ ffi,~ ~.Wm Parkin~! P2 EL 23.t,:.)m ar:J:00) QJ.J.;Q' ... Material Legend -Lowrise 0 ::s0:z Membrane c/W Granular Cap Shee!IKOC.,,11lm,~JoC-".,IG,.,y 0 ~~!~!sc1a Board. 2x6 on2~10 Colou1. Arc~c Vlh1le 0 !O::~·:r:~:~:i KaycanCohJur:Wh1le 0 !0~:~·&::;~~;ir Ka.ycanColour Wh,le ~ i~:~~~~S0!!11 Dark Colour. Hardie Colour N1gh1 Gray r CD 0 Y<v A A A A Ar l-~~~~~·~~-;(2.44m) HIGH FENCEj i ,.___,,,__' ,,___,,__.._A..A. >, .>.__>... "--" )._>,._.,. -'-AJ,.. >...A .k ..___,,__,_ Flashli19..s Colour: Roof Fasc1~1: Sid!ilg: Horizontal Hardie Colour Arctic White Siding: Horizontal Httrdie Colour N,ght Gr.iy Sid!i1g: Vertical {Bo.Jtd & Ba11eri) Hard,eCo!ourArclrcW/11te Siding.· Shingle Hardie Colour Night Gray Pol.,rWMe Windows: Vinyl WMeFr.in1es 1#1/dows: Vinyl Bl,1ckFrames Slone Veneer Pol01r While I Nole. Cascad1a Standard Colors Polar While Charcoal Ch,uco<1I 0 ~~~;;;;'a~0{~!o~:~~-Ceda,mil ~ Siding:Vertic. al '-1/ Board & Batten Hard1epanel.Cedarm1II Rust1cGmmBa1len8oard 0 ::~::~!~s ;;0~1le Frames ~d ~ ~~~~l~~~ae~d & Low•e 7exposurepaltern. Light Colour: H;11die Co tour Arct,c White ~ ~::~;°~:~:·11~:ri:~,~~:~r:91: 1 s:1:rs ~ Siding: Hardie Panel '</"Da1kerGreyColor 2.5 Batlen8omd011topol4B w,depdl1el @12·c•csp;,c,ng Colour matcl1ed tums l!, screw tasleners Ugh! Colour. Hardie Colour Archc White ~ t;t':!:ii~:~l/~~!e Coloui N,ghl Gray 0 ::~:.::ia·ct!:!::~:r~me DoubteGTazed&Low•e ~ Natural Slone Veneer ~PangaeaNatwalStone P,ov,denceOuarryLedgeslone I !I I r @i1 I I: 103) ,;~, I : I -•~=~'qi< 1 Roof Mid p • . EL. ~,.,2m amt 11~~~ South Elevation ~ ::~::s~ S~~':creens. Gullers. DownspoulsalDarkCladding ColouredlomalchGenlekSlate 0 ~~i~i::~~~-~~:~:: Parnted ColouredtomatchS1ore-F1011tWindow ar:J:00) ~ ◄ <3> ~~:~'i;!t)ed Trtms To 1T\iltch..idJacent Cl11dd111gcolour <3> i:::!:~1~~~1;::~~;:~~mric Pamt BM AC·26 Ozark Shadows 0> i:~:~;~:~~~~ !~:::~:Lk~d~uards ~ ~:: ~e::::Trims Cladding Frosledg1assatprivacyscreens TomatchadJacen!Claddmgco!our ~I Fr.ime Colour match Gentek Sl11te P,o,ide samples c,/ 1111 mcf:fior ca/ou,s t ma1en·a1s IOI r,:wc11 m ' Lough Highw [E~®w©1m@[ru □ ~@lliJUm)®@1~u 1 ~@lliJU[n} ~HITECTS INCORPOl!ATED tm-11JlorBu,k1:l<JPtrmi t~~1o°.'!'o~i,2:fl.ltr t•t~~ 1!~~~n,u..:t,:n t;:~~l~i ~%~ DP Arro:r.lmm ~::~~;~ ~~~onsui,:1,:n r::~~~,i1~3 c0n,u..:1,:n POLYGON HOMES PROVENANCE LOTC 11300P11u,en11Pl11c11 M11pleRldge,B.C. L11911IAddran: LolC Dl■lrlct Lot■402and403Group1 NWDPlanEPP79514 sea. ua·~ 1•.o- A~n12e.wn ASl -98.03 A-4.02 2nd floor Level Through Wall Scupper Detail -10.0Z, on Stone Veneer Finish Sf'K.;,Y t'OAl'111"'U._ATl0H TO ~!~:::OFf'I_Y...:,00 ::;:::~":.'~:'"" ntc?--11 Mainflaorlevel [L:;,,i,;;;;;;--- l-ll!IAL fLA',ollN6 /Nl'J------------- ~AIMA(,f,..._l()H ~~~~~~"" 111P'·<,~ :~·~ Pl P111~lng Ei:"":n00n Section Detail at Stone Veneer -10.0?' Section at Slair 1116+11EMP!:RA11,WE 5-ELF ;=~~ ~11~~~iis ElASTOHERIC. P ... 11◄1-j----: COlD ..i?INT ~::,,PROOFl>.6 jl ~Ii ~ i~~ ~ii~ OVE~ ~!~~ 6'~~Tc~'t OF X)INT ON C.ONCRl;ll: ~~:11l~t"'L REVE"'L e .. S>OMCR,CPAe,<u W.\LIPFLASIIII~ C./1151:AlANf, TYP. y ~ ""'y~ .,, y ~ ~ Y Y Y l ,.,,,·1 ·,oe ""' :1"><2' j Ell:TIC.AL ) G~ss Fence Sij e Mounted Delail l ~ A ~ ---------_____-t-S1JRFi E isl:6LET FLA5/llN6 HAlEJ~ OOF11'1(; ~~ HE~NE IP I!>" TO HALl T.O. Concrete Wall El.30.lOm -~ ~ ~ ~ MoinFloorleve) ,e"t~/4"~~,W~"~- r rrv-rr .-.-.r r--r-r~rr.-v--r r..--v--~ ~ DAYCARE 8' (2.44m) HIGH FENCE i ~~~~..A..AJ ...... ..J , \ ~e-Engineered Railing Section Detail •10.0p' Side Mounted Railing on Concrete Wall 5CALE,3"•1'-0' .... -~ I ~ ~ ■■-ARCHl1ECTS INCO~~ Lssuc~lcrBu;i:Ji9P:1m, fr~~~li~:::~n .,,_~,.25111, 2022 11,~uca ror ~w, OP .l,.m,r,amm s,,1rt.1n.2022 fit·~SUldlCICcnlU~!JCn lh111t202J ~~~~~2t~c; CcnlUL.t.:t,;n " ~ i POLYGON HOMES PROVENANCE LOT C Civle Add1H1: 11300 Paur•"" P/ac• Mapl1Rldge,8.C. LagalAddren: LotCOl1lrlc:t Lob 402and403Group 1 NWD PlanEPP79514 Concrete Details sra. ,-,,...,lull Ap1J2;,20l2 ASl-98.08 A-10.02 ~ Maple Ridee ~ CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT NO. 2024-155-VP TO: POLYGON PROVENANCE HOMES LTD., INC.NO, BC0973398 1333 W. BROADWAY AVE SUITE 900 VANCOUVER BC VGH 4C2 (the "Permittee") APPENDIX D 1. This Development Variance Permit (the "Permit") is issued subject to compliance with all the Bylaws of the City of Maple Ridge (the "Municipality") applicable thereto, except as specifically varied or supplemented by this Permit. 2. This Permit applies to, and only to those lands within the Municipality described below and any and all buildings, structures, and other development thereon: LOT C DISTRICT LOTS 402 AND 403 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN EPP79514 (PID: 030-627-788) (the "Lands") 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No 7600-2019, Part 4, Section 405.4 Fence Requirements, Subsection 3a, as amended, is varied as follows: a. The maximum permitted height of not exceeding 1.2 metres on any portion of a lot and 2.0 metres to the rear of the building front, is increased to a maximum permitted height of 2.44 metres on any portion of the lot. 4. The Lands described herein shall be developed strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions and provisions of this Permit and any plans and specifications attached to this Permit which shall form a part hereof. 5. If the Permittee does not substantially commence the development permitted by this Permit, this Permit shall lapse on July 23, 2026, which is 24 months from the date of Council Authorization. 6. This Permit is not a Building Permit. AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION passed by the Council the 23rd day of JULY, 2024. ISSUED on the day of City of Maple Ridge Planning Department 2024. 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC VZX 6A9 CORPORATE OFFICER mapleridge.ca @yourmapleridge ~ Maple Ridee ~ Appendices: Appendix A: Subject Map Appendix B: Plan showing variances City of Maple Ridge Planning Department 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 mapleridge.ca @yourmapleridge O®O ~ Maple Ridee - TO: FROM: His Worship Mayor Dan Ruimy and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: July 16, 2024 FILE NO: MEETING 01-0640-30-2024 cow SUBJECT: Urban Forest Management Strategy -Final Executive summary: Development of an Urban Forest Management Strategy (UFMS) is an initiative of the strategic priority for Climate Leadership and Environmental Stewardship. This strategy development process was initiated in 2023, after background research and investigation was completed. The first round of community engagement was conducted in fall 2023, the second round of community engagement took place in March 2024, asking for feedback on the draft report. The Parks, Recreation & Culture Advisory Committee, as well as the Environmental Advisory Committee were engaged during the development of the UFMS. The final UFMS (Attachment A) has been developed using the information gathered to date including the tree canopy modeling, public engagement findings, Committees of Council, and staff input. A draft of the UFMS was presented at the February 27th, 2024, Council Workshop meeting. Feedback received at this meeting and from the second round of community engagement was incorporated into the final version of the UFMS, along with the action plan for implementation. Implementation of the strategy will be incorporated into subsequent business planning cycles. Recommendation: That the Urban Forest Management Strategy be endorsed in principle. Discussion: a) Background context: A cross-departmental staff working group, along with Diamond Head Consulting Ltd., was created in early 2023 to guide the development of the strategy and process. Maple Ridge's urban forest is a network of natural and urban trees and landscapes that includes a diverse range of forests and associated ecosystems. This natural network includes trees along boulevards, within parks, on private properties such as gardens and yards, on City owned lands and private lands, and in natural forests (Figure 1) Doc # 3829259 Page 1 of 5 street tree yard tree streams;de tree tree in agricultural areas Figure 1-Components of the Urban Forest in Maple Ridge natural forested areas Initial phases of the project included reviewing the City's LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging Imagery) tree canopy mapping to compile an assessment of the City's total tree canopy coverage. Within the Official Community Plan boundary, overall, Maple Ridge has a 54% tree canopy cover and a 38% tree canopy cover within the Urban Boundary, which includes most developed areas of the City as well as the Urban Reserve (Thornhill). Background information from staff interviews and various datasets were compiled to produce the Urban Forest Interim Report document, included in the UFMS. The Interim Report is a snapshot of the City's current state of the urban forest. The first phase of community engagement to understand residents' values and opinions on the urban forest occurred from September 19 -October 20, 2023 , with three open house opportunities taking place, a survey, and an urban forest mapping tool. Overall, nearly 1,000 people were informed through the Engage Maple Ridge platform which resulted in 322 respondents engaging with the mapping tool and survey. Results of the public engagement are shared in Appendix 2 of the UFMS. Findings from the first phase of community engagement were used to inform the development of the draft UFMS. Drafting of the strategy took place over the fall, including presentations to the Parks, Recreation & Culture Advisory Committee and Environmental Advisory Committee. The staff working group has reviewed and provided comments on the UFMS. A valuable performance measure to track progress towards achieving the vision and goals of the strategy is to establish a tree canopy target. The UFMS includes setting a tree canopy target in the urban area of 40%, an increase over the current 38% tree canopy coverage for this area. Four key goal areas were identified as strategic areas of focus, with strategies and actions identified under each of these areas to achieve the 40% tree canopy coverage target. Doc # 3829259 Page 2 of 5 The Goals of the"UFMS include: 1. Protect and Expand the urban forest 2. Integrate and Adapt the Urban Forest Management Strategy 3. Manage and Sustain the urban forest 4. Engage and Partner on urban forest management The second community engagement phase took place from March 1-24, 2024 with a virtual open house and survey that asked residents to review the draft strategy and rank the proposed strategies based on what was important to them. A summary of the second phase of community engagement is provided in the infographic below. Urban Forest Management Strategy • Update by;laws, ll!Olic:::ies, alild guidelines to proted and expalila tme l!Jrbam forest • Plant trees to expand the urban foriest to imfi)rave climate resilien,:;:e and equity • Priatect and restare far.est lands to supp>ort li>iodiversity and healthy e€esy,stern functianing Figure 2 -What We Learned -Phase 2 Engagement Summary Doc # 3829259 Page 3 of 5 The final version of the UFMS contains an action plan with 59 actions that offer detailed guidance on steps to take to achieve the 40% tree canopy coverage target in the urban area by 2045. The action plan is detailed on page 74 of the UFMS (see Attachment A) and includes the priority actions such as updating the Tree Protection and Management bylaw, incorporating the tree canopy target into the Official Community Plan (OCP) and area plans, establishing an annual budget for new tree planting, and applying to external funding opportunities such as the "Growing Canada's Community Canopies" fund. b) Strategic alignment: The development of an Urban Forest Management Strategy aligns with Council's Strategic Plan (2023-2026) priorities for: • Climate Leadership and Environmental Stewardship o Mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change o Enhance and protect the health of our natural environment c) Interdepartmental implications: A cross-departmental working group, consisting of representatives from Parks, Engineering, Planning & Environment, and Fire Department, have been involved throughout the process of the UFMS development. Key priority action plan items have been reviewed with various departments as they relate to their functional areas of expertise. d) Business plan/financial implications: The development of an UFMS is a key strategic goal of the 2023 Business Plan and Council's Strategic Plan. Priority implementation actions that require additional funding support will be brought forward as part of the annual business planning process for 2025 and subsequent years as the action plan is implemented. Conclusion: The UFMS has been developed with input from staff, Council, and residents through 2 phases of community engagement. The UFMS consists of 4 key goals, 10 strategies, and 59 detailed action items to achieve the target of a 40% tree canopy coverage within the urban area by 2045. Doc # 3829259 Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Chad Neufeld, MBCSLA Manager of Parks Planning and Development Reviewed by: Director of Facilities, Parks and Properties ~ ~ , Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: (A) Urban Forest Management Strategy document Doc # 3829259 Page S of S DRAFTDRAFT URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN June 2024 Final ii Urban Forest Management Strategy iii Land Acknowledgment The City of Maple Ridge recognizes that we are located on the traditional and unceded territory of the q̓ ic̓əy̓ (Katzie) and qʼʷa:n̓ ƛʼən̓ (Kwantlen) First Nations and are grateful to be on this territory. Urban Forest Management Strategyiv TABLE OF CONTENTS Land Acknowledgment iii Strategy at a Glance v Glossary vii 1 Introduction 1 2 Understanding the Urban Forest 3 What is an urban forest? 4 Why is the urban forest important? 5 .Why do we manage the urban forest? 9 Who manages the urban forest? 10 What types of urban forest assets are found in Maple Ridge? 11 Maple Ridge’s climate and geography 12 3 The State of the Urban Forest 14 Canopy cover 15 Urban forest structure 25 Tree inventory 28 Forest stands on and near City-owned lands 29 Ecosystem services valuation 32 Tree equity 34 4 Urban Forest Management Framework 38 Policies and plans that guide urban forest management 39 Urban forest management program 44 Urban forest report card 46 5 What We Heard 47 Phase 1 Engagement highlights 48 Phase 2 Engagement highlights 51 6 Planning for the Future: Vision, Goals and Targets 53 Urban forest goals 54 The urban forest target 55 7 Achieving Our Goals: Strengths, Challenges, Strategies 57 Overview of Urban Forest Goals and Strategies 58 GOAL 1: Protect and Expand the Urban Forest 59 GOAL 2: Integrate and Adapt the Urban Forest Management Strategy 65 GOAL 3: Manage and Sustain the Urban Forest 68 GOAL 4: Engage and Partner on the Urban Forest Management 72 8 The Action Plan 74 The Action Plan 75 Monitoring Plan 81 9 References 82 10 Appendices 83 Appendix 1: Overview of Bylaws and Other Policy Tools Guiding Urban Forest Management in Maple Ridge 84 Appendix 2: Engagement Summaries 85 v Urban Forest Management Strategy Strategy at a Glance Maple Ridge, renowned for its abundant urban forest and natural areas, stands as one of the most forested communities in Metro Vancouver. However, its urban forest faces escalating challenges, such as intensifying urban heat islands, prolonged droughts, emerging pests and invasive species, and increasing space constraints due to densification. In response to these challenges, Maple Ridge has developed its first-ever Urban Forest Management Strategy to guide the planning and management of its invaluable urban forest resources. The 20-Year Vision Maple Ridge’s Urban Forest Management Strategy establishes a clear vision for the next 20 years. It delineates goals and strategies that will guide urban forest management to achieve a thriving, resilient and climate adapted urban forest. Maple Ridge boasts a thriving, resilient and climate adapted urban forest that is essential to community health and well-being, provides high-value recreational opportunities, supports ecological health and biodiversity, offers cost-effective climate solutions, and improves livability for all residents. Canopy Cover Target Achieve 40% tree canopy cover in the urban area by 2045. Goals The Urban Forest Management Strategy is driven by four goals with associated strategies and actions to achieve the Strategy’s vision and target: Urban Forest Management Strategyvi Priority Actions The Urban Forest Management Strategy delineates 61 actions, offering detailed guidance on the implementation of the Strategy. These actions are integral to realizing the established urban forest vision, target, and goals. Implemented across varying timeframes—short-term, medium-term, and long-term—the actions are strategically designed to address immediate needs while also fostering sustained progress and long-lasting impact in Maple Ridge’s urban forest management endeavors. Some of the highest priority actions include: • Review and update the tree protection and management bylaw to ensure adequate planting and protection measures are in place • Develop public realm design standards, including soil volume minimums and acceptable planting site technologies, to guide major development proposals and area planning processes to support tree health • Develop a biodiversity strategy to identify current biodiversity and habitat resources, set conservation targets, and recommend policies and procedures to guide future land acquisition and restoration processes • Incorporate the canopy target as a policy objective within the OCP (including new and existing area plans) • Establish an inter-departmental working group within the City to support the Strategy implementation • Establish a dedicated annual budget for planting new trees along streets, in parks and naturalized area • Integrate urban forest assets into the City’s asset management system • Ensure all newly planted trees are watered following the establishment maintenance best practices • Reassess canopy cover every 5 years using LiDAR or other accurate methods as technology advances, and consider updating the State of the Urban Forest Interim Report every 5 years • Investigate community’s interest and launch outreach programs to encourage public tree planting and care • Explore opportunities to partner with local First Nations to develop culturally appropriate forest stewardship practices and forest management practices in forested areas • Improve communication and coordination with utility companies as well as CP Rail to ensure the application of appropriate practices in managing and protecting trees vii Urban Forest Management Strategy Glossary Biodiversity The number and types of plants and animals that exist in a particular area, and the relationships that exist between them. Biodiversity includes diversity differences in genes, species and ecosystems. Canopy cover A measure of the extent of the urban forest based on the amount of ground covered by the foliage of trees when viewed from above. Ecosystem services The many and varied benefits to humans provided by the natural environment and from healthy ecosystems. Recreation potential, shade, water filtration, and pollination are all examples of ecosystem services associated with the urban forest. Green infrastructure Natural assets such as forests, streams, wetlands, vegetation, soils and bioengineered or landscape design solutions that exist now and that have the potential to be incorporated into sites, streets, and neighborhoods that collectively provide the community with a broad array of products, services, and benefits that are crucial to health, livability, cost saving, and sustainable development. Tree equity When all people experience the benefit of trees and the urban forest in proportion to their needs. Urban forest All trees and their ecosystems within the municipality, including trees in private yards, public parks, conservation areas, environmental buffers, open spaces as well as those along boulevards and roadways, and in wetlands, natural areas, and the City’s vast woodland communities. Urban forest program A set of activities performed by the City and community partners to plan, grow, manage, protect, and steward the urban forest, as well as all related policies, equipment, resources and knowledge. 1 Urban Forest Management Strategy 1 Introduction The City of Maple Ridge’s lush urban forest is a defining characteristic of the municipality’s identity. The city has abundant and easily accessible natural areas, as well as ornamental trees lining parks, gardens, and streets. Beyond serving as aesthetic and recreational attractions, Maple Ridge’s urban forest is an indispensable natural asset crucial to the community’s overall well-being. Trees and forests provide shade and cool urban heat islands, filter air and water pollutants, enhance mental and physical health, support biodiversity, and store carbon to reduce greenhouse emissions. However, Maple Ridge’s urban forest is being put under increasing stress from the impacts of climate change including drought, extreme weather, pests, and diseases. Moreover, urban development to accommodate a growing population might present challenges in meeting the Official Community Plan’s policy to “promote the retention of urban and mature trees and of natural forests and woodland areas”. To respond to these challenges, the City of Maple Ridge has developed a comprehensive Urban Forest Management Strategy to guide its current and future efforts to protect and enhance the urban forest. The Strategy includes the following sections: 1. Introduction: introduces the Urban Forest Management Strategy and outlines its structure 2. Understanding the Urban Forest: defines Maple Ridge’s urban forest and its key components, describes the benefits it provides, and the importance of managing it 3. The State of the Urban Forest: describes the historical context of Maple Ridge’s urban forest and summarizes its current condition 4. Urban Forest Management Framework: describes the regulatory context for urban forest management and provides an overview of the municipal management program 5. What We Heard: summarizes important community values collected from the public engagement conducted for this project 6. Planning for the Future: Vision, Goals and Targets: presents a 20-year vision of the urban forest, and describes projected canopy cover changes over time and a recommended canopy target 7. Achieving Our Goals: Strengths, Challenges, and Strategies: presents the four strategic goals, related challenges and strengths, and accompanying strategies to move towards the vision and goals 8. The 20-Year Action Plan: provide a system for tracking progress on implementation of the goals and strategies. 2 Understanding the Urban Forest 4 Urban Forest Management Strategy What is an urban forest? Forested ParksForested ParksAgricultureUrban Centre Residential Areas Rivers and Streams street tree green infrastructure park tree streamside tree yard tree tree in agricultural areas natural forested areas landscaping tree Commercial & IndustrialUrban ParksFraser River Maple Ridge’s urban forest is a network of natural and urban landscapes that includes a diverse range of trees and associated ecosystems. This network includes trees along boulevards, within parks, on private properties such as gardens and yards, and in natural forests. The urban forest serves as ‘green infrastructure’ that delivers benefits to support the community’s overall health, resilience, and well-being. Figure 1. Components of Maple Ridge’s urban forest 5 Urban Forest Management Strategy Why is the urban forest important? Urban forests are vital ecosystems that significantly enhance the quality of life for both residents and wildlife in urban areas. As cities grapple with the escalating climate crisis, the importance of green spaces in maintaining the livability of cities like Maple Ridge has become more pronounced. A single tree can provide a shady spot for a family picnic, but it is the collective power of an urban forest that effectively combats the urban heat island effect, cooling urban areas during scorching summer heatwaves. Trees act as natural air conditioners, releasing water vapor during respiration that cools the surrounding air. When it rains, urban forests play a crucial role in stormwater management. The canopy, bark, and roots of trees intercept and absorb rainwater, mitigating the intensity of runoff and reducing the burden on drainage systems. The urban forest is an interconnected network of urban trees and natural areas that provides crucial habitat for wildlife and places for people to recreate and relax. Forests dampen sound, preserving quiet green spaces in the heart of the city where humans recreate and wildlife live1. Wildlife relies on healthy urban forests for suitable habitats2. Forests provide critical shade and soil stabilization for sensitive habitats including salmon-bearing streams. These and many other benefits of urban forests are sometimes called ecosystem services. In this document, ecosystem services refer to the things trees do for human society and the environment, often at no direct cost. There are four main types of ecosystem services3: Cultural The intangible benefit derived from ecosystems. This includes aspects related to beautification, sense of place, mental and physical health, spirituality, and tourism. Regulating Natural processes that offer immediate benefits, like pollination that allows plants to produce fruit and reproduce, or tree absorbing and storing carbon from the atmosphere, purifying the air, preventing soil erosion, and offering shade. Supporting Natural processes that provide indirect benefits by creating the conditions for other services to occur, such as photosynthesis and decomposition. These processes enable the conversion of light to energy for plants and facilitate the breakdown of organic matter, returning vital nutrients to the ecosystem. Provisioning The direct products of trees and forests, such as medicines, fruits, mushrooms, clean water, wood, and plant fibers. 6 Urban Forest Management Strategy Urban forest benefits Benefits are provided at multiple scales, from individual trees to native forest stands, and throughout the urban forest. Many of the ecosystem services urban forests provide are related to the size and health of trees4. For example, large, healthy trees provide more shade or filter more pollutants from air and water. Similarly, a large, healthy forest is better at cooling the air through evapotranspiration or providing good habitat for native biodiversity. Some of these benefits are described in more detail below. Healthy people healthy communities Trees and forests have positive effects on the mental and physical well-being of individuals. Within the urban forest, opportunities are presented for quiet contemplation and exercise. Exposure to greenery has been found to reduce stress levels, enhance performance at work, and potentially expedite recovery during hospital stays5,6,7. Having a nearby park or natural areas has been linked to a higher likelihood of individuals achieving recommended levels of physical activity8. Financial value The urban forest stimulates the local economy. Visitors are drawn to Maple Ridge to explore its forested natural areas, and in the process, they contribute to the local economy by patronizing nearby businesses. Urban trees help local shops outperform commercial districts with lesser trees by encouraging people to stay longer and spend more9. High cover of trees is associated with the rise of neighbourhood properties in studies from Finland to Florida10,11,12. 7 Urban Forest Management Strategy A sense of place In Maple Ridge, the abundance of trees and forests are integral to people’s perception of the City. These forests and trees hold deep significance for individuals and communities that contribute to cultural benefits like strong civic and identity pride13. Clean air and water Trees and forests capture rain and stormwater runoff that is then filtered by roots and surrounding soils14,15. Some of this filtered water reemerges in streams, lakes, wetlands, and ponds – or even from a tap or hose. The urban forest contributes to improved air quality by absorbing pollutants such as carbon monoxide, road particulates, and nitrogen dioxide while releasing oxygen16,17. Climate resilience One of Maple Ridge’s key strategic objectives is to be a climate resilient City. With climate change ushering hotter drier summers, warmer winters, and more intense rainfall, the City aims to alleviate some of these effects through a healthy and robust urban forest. The urban forest takes in carbon dioxide and stores carbon in wood, plant tissues, and soils, helping to limit global climate change16,18. At the local level, trees and forests do much more to help adapt to climate change impacts. Through evapotranspiration, trees release water through their leaves and cool the surrounding air. Summer shade keeps streets, sidewalks, and buildings comfortable19. Urban areas with minimal vegetation experience temperatures several degrees warmer than areas with over 40% canopy cover, and that difference can be life threatening during a heat wave18. Habitat and biodiversity Our urban forest serves as a biodiversity reserve20. Trees, both in their living and dead states, provide habitat for many plants, animals, fungi, and microbes. Intact forests with complex habitats support an even wider array of life, including iconic species such as salmon, eagles, and bears. Having a wide variety of biodiversity is crucial for safeguarding ecosystem services that enable human life in the city, like the cycling of nutrients and pollination of gardens. Animal residents of the urban forest also benefit from many of the same ecosystem services that humans appreciate, including access to clean water and forest foods21. Regional Impacts of Climate Change The climate in our region is changing. Generally speaking, climate change will result in wetter, milder winters and much hotter, drier summers22 and these changes will have multiple impacts on our region and forests. Hotter summers are likely to increase the urban heat island effect, whereby concrete and asphalt store thermal energy during the day and release it at night, preventing urban areas from cooling once the sun goes down. Exposure to elevated temperatures over a long duration is particularly dangerous to people vulnerable to heat stress, such as seniors, those without homes or adequate shelter, infants, and individuals with respiratory illnesses23. Warmer, drier summers also create drought conditions that make vegetation and dead woody fuels drier. This means that, when fires do start, there is more fuel available to burn, fires grow more quickly and the intense fires are more difficult to put out. Forest health is also impacted by climate change because urban trees may need more irrigation to survive and water shortages will mean this water needs to come from alternative sources than the region’s reservoirs24. In the future, forests may also be impacted by an increased incidence of damaging pests. Shorter, milder winters mean that fewer pest species will die off, allowing populations to increase and new species to survive in the region 22. 8 Urban Forest Management Strategy TEMPERATURES Average daily maximum temperature increase of 5°C. Milder winters. Summer extremes of 40°C (1-in- 20 hottest day). PRECIPITATIONMore rain throughout year, except in summer. Longer summer dry spells. Amount of snow decreasing. MELTWATER Faster snowmelt. Earlier peak spring flows and flooding. Lower late-summer flows. VARIABILITY More frequent and unseasonal extreme weather GROWING SEASONSLonger and warmer growing season, increasing by 108 days. WILL LIKELY CAUSE SPECIES DISTRIBUTION SHIFTS Forest species may shi northward and upslope as heat and moisture conditions exceed their tolerance. LESS MOISTURE AVAILABILITY Evapotranspiration rates will increase relative to precipitation, resulting in drier soils and vegetation. LONGER, WARMER GROWING SEASONS Longer growing seasons may support more growth, species diversity and potentially more carbon sequestration. MORE EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS Heat, extreme precipitation, freezing rain, heavy wet snow, flooding, landslides, windstorms and other events may happen more oen leading to more tree damage. LONGER FIRES SEASONS AND LARGER FIRES Fires may occur more oen and burn larger areas. Fire risk is expected to increase based on warmer, drier summers. MORE PESTS AND INVASIVE SPECIES Pests may reproduce more rapidly and more oen. Trees and ecosystems may be more vulnerable to attack and invasion. CO2 EVAPOTRANSPIRATIONIncreased rates of evaporation and transpiration from waterbodies, soil and plants. BY THE 2080s, PROJECTED CHANGES* TO: * Projected changes based on modeling for Metro Vancouver using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 scenario (RCP8.5), which represents a high emissions pathway with limited mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by the end of this century (or “Business as Usual”). 9 Urban Forest Management Strategy .Why do we manage the urban forest? Management of the urban forest is essential to sustain the health and longevity of urban forests. Trees, much like other types of city assets, require maintenance to maximize the benefits they provide and ensure a long service life. Strategic care can prolong a tree’s life, enhancing its ecological, social, and economic contributions. Large mature trees provide more wildlife habitat, are more effective at cooling, and become beloved landmarks for the community. However, large trees in urban settings also carry potential risks – such as dead or broken branches or lifting sidewalks – that need to be managed for public safety. Proper planning and management can minimize risks, maximize benefits and extend a tree’s life. Urban forests require management for: Tree health and risk Urban forests need regular inspection, pruning and maintenance to promote good health and structure and prevent hazards from occurring. Biodiversity Urban forests are less diverse and more fragmented than natural ones. Management is necessary to maintain connectivity and support diverse species. Wildfire Forests contain woody fuels that can carry wildfire. Planning and management of urban vegetation can mitigate wildfire risk. Access and Equity The community benefits from urban forests are maximized when they are accessible and healthy. Proper planning and management ensure these forests are nearby and well-maintained. Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Urban forests help in climate change mitigation and adaptation but are also affected by it. Management is key to enhancing their resilience to environmental stresses like heat, drought, and pests. Effective urban forest management minimizes risk and maximizes the benefits trees provide to the community. 10 Urban Forest Management Strategy Who manages the urban forest? Many partners play a role in the planning, planting, management, protection, and stewardship of Maple Ridge’s urban forest (Table 1). Who manages the urban forest?What do they manage? City of Maple Ridge Trees and forests along streets, in parks, in conservation areas, and on other City property. The City also regulates the removal and replacement of trees on private lands. First Nations Maple Ridge is the ancestral and unceded homelands of the Katzie First Nation and Kwantlen First Nation. As part of the journey towards reconciliation, it is important for the City, local organizations, and residents to understand the historical and ongoing impacts from colonial settlement and their traditional knowledge and practices for more equitable, inclusive, and sustainable practices. Residents/landowners/property developers Manage trees and forests on private land. Residents also advocate for, benefit from, and participate in the stewardship of trees and forests on public lands through committees, community organizations, and as individuals. NGOs Such as the Alouette River Management Society (ARMS) and Kanaka Education & Environment Partnership (KEEPS), offer educational and stewardship opportunities to local communities and individuals and support greening and ecological restoration in Maple Ridge. Utility companies Plants, prunes, and removes trees near utility lines. Private industry arborists and landscape companies Provide tree-related professional services such as tree planting, pruning, and risk assessment. Educational institutes Manage, plant, harvest, and research trees and forests on their lands, such as the UBC Malcolm Knapp Research Forest and BCIT Woodlot. Metro Vancouver Manages forests and vegetation in regional parks. It also provides regional-level urban forestry resources and guidance for member jurisdictions, and identifies, protects, and manages lands with high biodiversity and natural heritage value. Province of British Columbia Manages forests and vegetation on Provincial land. Regulates watercourses and their riparian areas and the Agricultural Land Reserve. The Province also monitors forest health, provincial wildlife and habitat regulations, and is responsible for native forest climate change adaptation strategies. The BC Parks manages the Provincial Parks within Maple Ridge, such as the Golden Ears Provincial Park. Government of Canada Provides funding for climate adaptation and mitigation, and regulates invasive pests, plants, and diseases. Table 1. The urban forest is managed by different organizations and individuals 11 Urban Forest Management Strategy What types of urban forest assets are found in Maple Ridge? The type of trees and forests managed in Maple Ridge vary depending on where they are located along a continuum of rural to urban land uses. The Rural-to-Urban Transect was designed as a tool to better integrate the environment into urban design25. The Transect categorizes a range of typical land uses and the types of natural and landscaped features that can be prioritized within them along a natural to human habitat continuum. Figure 2 uses the Transect to illustrate where the different types of urban forest assets are usually found, and how they are managed, across different land uses in Maple Ridge. In rural areas, native forest ecosystems are managed for habitat and ecosystem health. Management in suburban areas with low-density residential development focuses on yard trees, street trees and park trees to offer shade, provide habitat for urban wildlife, incorporate stormwater features, and to create a greener neighbourhood look. As land use becomes increasingly urban, the focus shifts to developing compact, walkable neighbourhoods with street trees, parks, plazas, and green infrastructure such as green roofs and walls, rain gardens, and below-ground infiltration. NATURAL Coolest Most canopy Most pervious Most natural ecosystems Least urban trees Lowest population density Lowest management need Lowest cost of management Hottest Least canopy Least pervious Least natural ecosystems Most urban trees Highest population density Highest managemet need Highest cost of management Forests are relatively self-sustaining and low maintenance. Sometimes restoration, risk inspections, wildfire fuel treatments may be needed. Ornamental and shade trees in landscaped and maintained park settings are individually planted but typically require less frequent maintenance than street trees. Trees on private land are taken care of by residents or landowners. The level of management is highly variable depending on the land manager Street trees are individually planted and maintained for clearance, health, and risk management. Street trees typically receive a high level of service because of proximity of infrastructure Trees are sometimes used in bioengineered solutions like bioswales, pervious pavement or infiltration systems. Trees can benefit from the soil volume and stormwater and achieve co-benefits. Forest areas Park trees Yard trees Street trees Bioengineered RURAL SUBURBAN rural to urban GENERAL URBAN URBAN CENTRE URBAN CORE INDUSTRIAL & MIXED EMPLOYMENT Figure 2. The Rural-to-Urban Transect provide a framework for understanding the range of different land uses and their characteristics in terms of the built and natural environment typically found within them 12 Urban Forest Management Strategy Maple Ridge’s climate and geography Maple Ridge has a temperate climate, marked by mild, wet winters and warm, dry summers, due to the influence of Pacific Ocean. Rainfall is abundant in the autumn and winter months. While temperatures in Maple Ridge generally remain moderate, occasional extremes bring an element of unpredictability to its otherwise mild climate. Summer drought can lead to conditions that cause tree mortality raise the risk of wildfire. Climate change is expected to increase summer drought conditions and the frequency of extreme events. The geography of Maple Ridge is a mix of rugged mountainous terrain, rolling hills, and plains carved out by the Fraser River. The Alouette River, Kanaka Creek and their tributaries form riparian corridors throughout Maple Ridge. This varied topography is covered by a range of soil types, from the fertile sediments of the river valley to the more challenging, rocky soils of the higher elevations. Maple Ridge is within the Coastal Western Hemlock (CWH) biogeoclimatic zone, as defined by the British Columbia Ecosystem Classification System26. The climate and geography of Maple Ridge supports lush, dense forests primarily composed of coniferous trees including Western Hemlock, Western Redcedar and Douglas Fir. Broadleaf trees like Bigleaf Maple, Red Alder, and Black Cottonwood grow in riparian areas and mixed in with coniferous trees in younger forests. Industrial logging activities cleared much of Maple Ridge throughout the 1900s (Figure 3). During this period, local historical records indicated two large fire that started due to logging operations27,28. Disturbed lands have since been developed or regrown into secondary forests, forming the rural and urban landscapes of Maple Ridge today (Figure 4). Figure 3. 1920-1924 Allco headquarters camp, seen from the western slope of the Alouette River valley (source: Maple Ridge Museum) 13 Urban Forest Management Strategy Figure 5. Downtown Maple Ridge art mural titled The Mountain of the Golden Eagle created by Kwantlen First Nation artist, Brandon Gabriel (Source: City of Maple Ridge) A glimpse of the history of Maple Ridge The land known today as Maple Ridge is traditionally known by its Halkomelem name, Z’wa?acstan, which translates to “place where the golden eagles are”. Prior to European settlement, the land has been inhabited and cared for by the q̓ ic̓əy̓ (Katzie) and qʼʷa:n̓ ƛʼən̓ (Kwantlen) First Nations for thousands of years. To this day, q̓ ic̓əy̓ (Katzie) and qʼʷa:n̓ ƛʼən̓ (Kwantlen) First Nations maintain deep connections to their lands and the rivers, sloughs, creeks., and the wetlands that run through their territories. Figure 4. View west down Lougheed Hwy in 1948 (Maple Ridge Museum Archives) and 2022 (Google Earth) shows development of both cleared and forested land as the City grew and densified 14 Urban Forest Management Strategy 3 The State of the Urban Forest 15 Urban Forest Management Strategy This section describes the current state of the urban forest in Maple Ridge, providing a snapshot of its health, composition, distribution and the benefits it offers to the community. Figure 6. Illustration on tree canopy Canopy cover Canopy cover is the area covered by tree canopy (i.e., branches and leaves) when viewed from above (Figure 6). It is typically reported as a percentage of a specific area, such as a city, park, or neighbourhood, that is covered by tree canopy. Tree canopy is a common metric used by municipalities to measure and track the extent of the urban forest over time. Maple Ridge’s canopy cover was estimated using an approach that integrates 2022 aerial Ortho imagery and remote Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data collected in December 2021. LiDAR technology employs laser light to map the ground surface, such as trees and buildings, from the air. LiDAR combined with orthoimagery can be used to create a precise map of tree canopy cover and t classify different types of trees (Figure 7). It should be noted that the LiDAR data collected in 2021 did not cover the entire Official Community Plan (OCP) boundary (Figure 8). To address this data gap, consultants used a coarser resolution (5 meters) canopy map from the 2020 Metro Vancouver land cover. The accuracy of urban tree counts and canopy summaries may differ between the two data sources used. Figure 7. LiDAR data collection and tree canopy mapping process Figure 8. The areas where LiDAR data was collected in Maple Ridge 16 Urban Forest Management Strategy Current canopy cover Within the Official Community Plan boundary Canopy cover is summarized for the area within the Official Community Plan (OCP) Boundary (Figure 9). The OCP boundary illustrates areas where future growth and development will take place in Maple Ridge, thus where changes in the urban forest are most likely to occur. Figure 9. Official Community Plan boundary and municipal boundary and tree canopy cover mapped using December 2021 LiDAR and summer 2022 orthophotos. 17 Urban Forest Management Strategy As of 2022, Maple Ridge’s urban forest canopy cover within the OCP boundary is estimated at 54% (or 7,939 hectares of area). Within the urban areas, as defined by the OCP, the canopy cover stands at 38%. Maple Ridge’s canopy cover is higher than that of most municipalities in the Metro Vancouver region, thanks to extensive native forests in conservation areas and parklands. Within urban areas, the canopy cover stands at 38%, while non-urban areas average at 60%. Maple Ridge’s urban tree canopy cover is above the regional average. Figure 10. Maple Ridge’s canopy cover derived from December 2021 LiDAR and summer 2022 orthophotos 18 Urban Forest Management Strategy Figure 11. Canopy cover within the Urban Containment Boundary by Metro Vancouver member jurisdictions in 2014 Metro Vancouver completed a region-wide canopy study in 2019. The methodology and scale used differed from the 2022 Maple Ridge study so the canopy cover results are not directly comparable. However, the Metro Vancouver results are useful for comparing all municipalities across Metro Vancouver. The 2019 Metro Vancouver study showed that Maple Ridge’s canopy cover in the Urban Containment Boundary was 46%, well above the regional average of 32% (Figure 11). 19 Urban Forest Management Strategy Figure 12. Official Community Plan land uses By OCP land use The OCP designates different uses of land in Maple Ridge, such as residential, commercial, and agricultural uses, as illustrated in Figure 12. Land use influences where and how trees can grow as the city develops and is therefore an important consideration for determining future canopy cover targets. The top three OCP land use designations— agricultural lands, low-density residential, and parks, green space, and conservation areas—have the highest canopy cover among all land uses (Figure 13). Collectively, they contribute to 92% of the canopy area within the OCP boundary. Parks, green space, and conservation areas have the most abundant urban forest, with 71% of canopy cover. In contrast, commercial areas have the lowest canopy cover at 12% (Figure 13). In the non-urban area, most canopy cover is found on agricultural, low density residential, park, greenspace and conservation area, and industrial land uses (Figure 14). Tree planting policies or programs or development activity in agricultural lands, low density residential land uses and industrial land uses are likely to have the most significant impact on future canopy in the non-urban area. 20 Urban Forest Management Strategy Figure 13. Land area (ha), canopy area (ha) and canopy cover (%) per OCP land use (excluding road rights-of-way) Figure 14. Canopy area (ha) per OCP land use and urban and non-urban lands 21 Urban Forest Management Strategy By ownership Ownership classes indicate who is the primary caretaker of the urban forest. In Maple Ridge, the urban forest spans public and private land. Of the 7,939 hectares of tree canopy within the OCP boundary, 49% is found on private land, 31% is owned by federal/provincial governments such as the Golden Ears Park, 15% is managed by Maple Ridge, and 8% is owned/managed by Metro Vancouver such as Kanaka Creek Regional Park. Figure 15. Ownership of land in Maple Ridge The City manages 15% of the entire tree canopy. The majority (58% of City-owned canopy) is found in City-owned parcels other than parks and road rights-of-way, such as Thornhill and Silver Valley. Road rights-of-way account for 25%, while municipal parks make up 17% (Figure 16). Figure 16. Proportion of canopy area by ownership (left) and by management unit within City-owned land (right) Urban Forest Management Strategy22 By neighbourhood Figure 17. Tree canopy by neighbourhood The distribution of canopy cover across Maple Ridge’s neighbourhoods varies. Generally, neighbourhoods located within the urban area boundaries tend to have a lower tree canopy cover, compared to non-urban areas. Figure 17 shows a noticeable gradient in tree canopy cover increasing from western neighbourhoods like South Alouette, Hammond, and West Maple Ridge to eastern neighbourhoods. Eastern neighbourhoods are primarily undeveloped or contain protected forest land thats supports higher tree canopy cover than the more developed urban or agricultural western neighbourhoods. 23 Urban Forest Management Strategy Canopy change over time Figure 18. Canopy gain in 2022 Figure 19. Canopy loss from 2001 to 2022 Canopy cover changes over time as trees are planted, grow, die, or are removed. Areas with canopy change were mapped using multiple years of satellite images (Figure 18 and Figure 19). Canopy loss is mapped from 2001 to 2022, while canopy gain is only mapped for 2022 due to data availability. Much of the loss and gain visible in the non-urban area is due to forestry or agricultural activities rather than land development. Loss and gain in the urban areas is mostly due to land development. 24 Urban Forest Management Strategy Canopy change through the development process The maps below illustrate how canopy loss and gain can be impacted by development. Initially, forested land that is cleared for development loses canopy. Once built, trees are planted as part of landscaping requirements. Initially, the trees are small and do not contribute much canopy cover. However, as these trees grow, the canopy gradually increased from 24% in 2016 to 27% by 2022. While development does often result in tree removal, it also creates opportunities to recover and grow canopy by creating planting sites and applying best management practices to support tree health and growth. 2011 Canopy cover (visual assessment*): 35% *due to lack of data 2016 Canopy cover (i-Tree estimate): 24% 2022 Canopy cover (i-Tree estimate): 27% Satellite mapping suggests that Maple Ridge has experienced more canopy loss in urban areas overall than gain, primarily in Silver Valley (Figure 19). Since 2001, approximately 246 hectares of canopy was mapped as loss (Figure 20). The satellite mapping is coarse and therefore only shows large scale (> 1 ha) areas of loss or gain. As a result, these maps would underestimate the gain from urban tree planting post-development. Figure 20. Extent of canopy loss within urban areas by year 25 Urban Forest Management Strategy Urban forest structure Tree type Maple Ridge’s urban forest is primarily coniferous, accounting for 71% of the total canopy area (Figure 21). Coniferous trees and forests are more abundant outside urban areas or in parks, especially in federal or provincial- owned native forest stands, while deciduous trees are more abundant in urban areas, especially on City- owned and privately-owned land.Figure 21. Canopy area by forest class Figure 22. Tree heights within the OCP area Tallest trees Maple Ridge is home to some exceptionally tall trees. Trees over 50 metres in height make up roughly 3% of the tree population. The tallest tree in Maple Ridge stands at over 70 meters in height, making it taller than the 13-story Baptist Tower – the tallest building in Maple Ridge. Tall trees are found in mature forests along streams, in parks and conservation areas, especially in Silver Valley, Golden Ears, and Blue Mountain. 26 Urban Forest Management Strategy Structure by OCP land use in the urban area The structure of Maple Ridge’s forest varies by land use within the urban area. Agriculture and park land uses tend to have a high count of tall trees, likely because these lands have older forest areas that have not been recently disturbed (Figure 23). Medium density land use also has a high proportion of tall trees because a large proportion of the land use includes undeveloped forested land. Commercial, industrial and low and high density residential land uses are dominated by small trees because of replanting with development or regeneration following disturbance. Public land uses including schools, cemeteries, hospitals, and other institutional land uses contain trees of quite varied sizes. These different forest structures provide insight into how the forest may change in the future. For example, canopy cover in low and high density residential areas is likely to continue to increase as young trees grow in size. By contrast, canopy cover in medium density residential areas is likely to decrease because tall trees will be impacted when forested areas are developed. Canopy cover targets need to account for these changes and predict the impact of future planting on the tree canopy in each of these land uses. 27 Urban Forest Management Strategy Figure 23. Forest structure plots of tree counts and canopy area by height class Urban Forest Management Strategy28 Tree inventory The City of Maple Ridge is in the process of updating its tree inventory. As of July 2023, the City maintains an inventory of 14,303 street and ornamental park trees. It is important to note that this inventory, while extensive, only covers a small fraction of the urban forest in the City because it does not include trees in forest stands. Inventory data also contains notable data gaps in Diameter at Breast Height (DBH, a measure of tree trunk size) (92% missing), condition rating (64% missing), and age information (3% missing). Therefore, the information presented in the following may not be an accurate reflection of Maple Ridge’s street and park trees’ conditions. Maple Ridge has a diverse urban forest, with over 270 tree species across 70 genera recorded in its current inventory. The most common genera are maple (Acer), cherry (Prunus), sweetgum (Liquidambar), mountain-ash (Sorbus), and hornbeam (Carpinus) (Figure 24). At the species level, red maple is over- represented at 24% of the inventory. The dominance of maple, and particularly red maple, in the inventory is a vulnerability because it increases the risk of widespread damage from pests or diseases that specifically target maples.Figure 24. Counts of trees by genus In terms of age, inventoried trees are relatively young, with 68% planted within the past 10 to 30 years (Figure 25). Only 6% are older specimens, primarily found in parks in West Maple Ridge. Older trees tend to provide more canopy cover, and more benefits overall, but it is also important to have a high proportion of young trees in the population to ensure a relatively stable canopy cover over the long term. Ideally, Maple Ridge should see a higher proportion of trees enter older age classes as time passes. Figure 25. Approximate time of planting for trees in the inventory 29 Urban Forest Management Strategy Forest stands on and near City-owned lands Forest stands on and near City-owned lands were mapped to identify large, predominantly municipally managed forest patches in Maple Ridge. Forest patches over 0.5 hectares in size located on or within 200 metres of a City- owned parcel are shown in Figure 26 and Figure 27. A total of 1,676 ha of forest stands comprised of 68% coniferous and 32% deciduous trees were found on or adjacent to City-managed lands. The majority (71%) of these forest stands are mature, coniferous stands located outside the urban areas (Figure 27). Within the urban area, most forest areas are deciduous or mixed and classified as young forest less than 80 years old. Though previously logged, these forests are characterized by large coniferous trees and shade- tolerant understory vegetation where canopy opens up. The remaining forests (478 hectares, 28%) are young and transitioning to mature stages, characterized by a more open forest canopy and distinct layers. Many forest stands on and near City-owned lands are also environmentally sensitive areas that support locally and regionally important biodiversity and connect to other conservation lands, Regional and Provincial Parks. Based on the mapped tree height, these stands can further be categorized into three successional stages: • Young and short stands: approximately 10 to 25 meters tall, and usually are 20-45 years old. These stands usually feature self-thinning, canopy opening, and height differentiation. • Young and tall stands: approximately 25 to 35 meters tall, and generally taller and denser than the young and short stands. More coniferous trees can be found in young and tall stands. They tend to be more mature and can extend to approximately 80 years old or more. • Mature stands: approximately 35 to 45 meters tall and generally over 80 years old. Trees in mature stands are well established and large in size. Urban Forest Management Strategy 30 Urban Forest Management Strategy Coniferous Deciduous Mixed Forest Stand Type 2 Kilometers ´ Figure 26. Types of forest stands on and near City-owned lands Mature Forest oun" Forest Tall oun" Forest S#ort Forest Successional Sta"e 2 Kilometers ´ Figure 27. Successional stages of forest stands on and near City-owned lands 31 Urban Forest Management Strategy Metro Vancouver Nature and Ecosystems Roadmap Metro Vancouver's ecosystems play a crucial role in the region's cultural, spiritual, and environmental fabric, contributing significantly to its livability and biodiversity. However, these ecosystems face threats from climate change, compounded by factors such as land development and invasive species. Metro Vancouver’s Nature and Ecosystems Roadmap outlines 31 actions to protect and enhance the region’s ecosystems organized under five strategic areas: • Protecting, restoring, and enhancing the region's ecosystems; • Connecting green infrastructure; • Integrating natural assets into conventional asset management and decision-making processes; • Supporting a resilient, robust, and healthy urban forest; and • Advancing nature-based solutions to climate change. The Roadmap sets targets to protect 50% of the region for nature and achieve 40% tree canopy cover within the Urban Containment Boundary. The Roadmap emphasizes the importance of rapid implementation to prevent future ecosystem loss and degradation while maximizing long-term carbon storage, resilience, and other co-benefits. Currently, approximately 40% of the region’s land is protected, primarily in the form of parks and publicly-owned lands for conservation or recreation. The region’s rich natural environment, from the Fraser River Estuary to diverse habitats like forests, wetlands, and watercourses, forms a mosaic supporting biodiversity, of which Maple Ridge is an important part. The following map provides an overview of area within the City boundary that are classified by Metro Vancouver as sensitive ecosystems. These areas include ecologically significant and sensitive ecosystems such as wetlands, freshwater reservoir, and old forests. 32 Urban Forest Management Strategy Ecosystem Service i-Tree Canopy Service Estimate Based on mapped tree canopy within the OCP Boundary i-Tree Eco Service Estimate Based on inventoried trees C stored in trees (t)609,919 2,282 C Sequestered in trees (t/year)20,477 87 Avoided runoff (L/year)2,210,060,823 7,230,000 Removed air pollutants (kg/year)699,381 1,177 CO removed annually (kg/year)6,191 - NO2 removed annually (kg/year)62,462 193.7 O3 removed annually (kg/year)442,074 940.5 PM10 (kg/year)130,559 - PM2.5 (kg/year)34,128 21.1 SO2 removed annually (kg/year)23,969 21.7 Table 2. Results of i-Tree Canopy assessment and scoped i-Tree Eco assessment using only the population captured through the City’s tree inventory Ecosystem services valuation Valuing the benefits that the urban forest offers to the community in financial terms is one way to represent the importance of critical natural resources and inform urban forest planning and management. Some of the ecosystem services that the urban forest provides have been valued using the USDA Forest Services’ i-Tree Canopy (https://canopy.itreetools.org/) and i-Tree Eco tools (https://www.itreetools.org/tools/i-tree- eco). i-Tree Canopy estimates ecosystem services values based on mapped canopy areas, while i-Tree Eco estimates values using tree inventory data for individual trees. Maple Ridge’s urban forest offers invaluable ecosystem services. According to the i-Tree Eco results, the urban forest within the OCP boundary stores almost approximately 610 thousand tonnes of carbon in tree biomass accumulatively and absorbs additional 20 thousand tonnes of carbon each year. It prevents over 2.2 billion litres of stormwater runoff and removes almost 700 thousand kilograms of air pollutants each year. The i-Tree Eco assessment estimated that inventoried trees in Maple Ridge store 2,282 tonnes of carbon and absorb an additional 87 tonnes of carbon each year. They collectively intercept over 7.2 million litres of stormwater runoff and remove 1,177 kg of air pollutants each year. Each year, Maple Ridge’s urban forest within the OCP Boundary can: • Sequester over 20,500 tonnes of carbon, or offset and emissions from 884 average passenger vehicles • Prevent over 2.2 billion litres of stormwater runoff, which is enough to fill Whonnock Lake 1.3 times 33 Urban Forest Management Strategy It is important to note that these ecosystem services estimates only focus on selected services of carbon storage and sequestration, stormwater management, and air pollution removal, and not the full range of services trees provide. For example, the latest research supports that trees provide significant value in public health savings and cultural benefits that are difficult to quantify. Additionally, the i-Tree Eco estimates are based on the City’s incomplete inventory data (as of July 2023) and would underestimate the total value of trees managed by the City. Urban Forest Management Strategy34 Tree equity Equity is an important consideration in urban forest management because it explores how fairly the benefits of the urban forest, and related services, are distributed among people who need them. It is the concept that the urban forest and its benefits should be accessible to all residents, regardless of their socioeconomic status, race, or location. However, many cities’ urban forests are not equitably distributed due to both past and present policies, land use and management decisions. To assess tree equity, a metric developed by American Forests called the Tree Equity Score (TES)29 was calculated by dissemination areas within the City of Maple Ridge. The calculation of TES considers: 1. Tree canopy cover need (based on the gap between existing canopy cover and the canopy target) 2. Priority index (based on social factors relating to climate vulnerability, income, age, ethnicity, and employment) (Table 3) Factor Description Climate Average land surface temperature, as measured from remote sensing data Income Percentage of people living on incomes below 200% of the federally defined poverty line (< $40,000) Age Percentage of seniors (age 65+) and children (0-14) Race and Ethnicity Percentage of people who belong to visible minority groups, as defined by the Employment Equity Act and, if so, the visible minority group to which the person belongs Employment Percentage of the labour force that does not have a job, but are available and willing Table 3. Priority index indicators used in the Tree Equity Score at the Census Dissemination Area Scale 35 Urban Forest Management Strategy Figure 28. Tree equity scores for Maple Ridge by dissemination area using 2022 canopy cover and 2021 census data Low Tree Equity Mid Tree Equity High Tree Equity A lower tree equity score means a greater need to improve tree equity. Figure 28 illustrates tree equity score by dissemination area. Tree equity scores in Maple Ridge range from 58 to 100. Areas with scores of 100 indicate blocks with no canopy cover gap, while areas with lower tree equity scores indicate that there is a gap in tree canopy cover, and a population in need of more tree canopy. This information can inform where to prioritize implementation of this Strategy. 36 Urban Forest Management Strategy •Population density •Projected Population Density (2031) •Lone Parent Families Density •Senior (Ages 70+) Population Density •Aboriginal Identity Density (note: official Statistics Canada terminology) •Recent Immigration Density •Visible Minority Density •Educational Attainment Density •Median Household Income •Labour Force Unemployment Density •Tenure Rented Density Maple Ridge’s efforts on increasing park equity Maple Ridge’s Parks, Recreation & Culture Master Plan is a comprehensive document that outlines the City’s vision and strategies for delivering parks, recreation, cultural services over the next decade. The Plan has identified potential focus areas based on 11 key equity indicators, which are: The park equity map illustrates areas characterized by varying levels of park supply, considering these equity indicators. Regions highlighted in orange signify areas with a higher concentration of equity- deserving groups but a relatively lower supply of parks. These areas require additional attention to enhance park supply, improve accessibility, and implement programs that foster stronger connections between the community and local parks. Park equity, coupled with the tree equity score, provides information about where to increase tree canopy and park supply to improve equitable distribution and access to these resources. The map on the right provide some examples of priority areas with low levels of both park equity and tree equity. Incorporating equity is vital for enhancing community resilience to climate change and addressing other social and environmental challenges. It ensures that efforts to enhance parks and urban forest resources contribute to a more inclusive, healthy, resilient, and equitable community. 37 Urban Forest Management Strategy Tree canopy and urban heat Climate vulnerability, assessed through land surface temperature, is an important consideration in calculating the tree equity score. Research has demonstrated that trees can effectively cool urban areas and mitigate urban heat islands, making cities more habitable and comfortable for residents, particularly during periods of extreme heat. In the face of climate change, the frequency and intensity of extreme heat events are on the rise. The devastating heat dome experienced in late June and early July 2021, resulted in over 600 deaths and serves as a stark example of this reality. As climate change continues to bring more heat-related challenges, ensuring that communities have access to urban forests for cooling and other climate- resilience benefits becomes increasingly vital. Figures 29 and 30 illustrate the cooling effects of trees, underlining their importance in addressing climate vulnerabilities.Figure 29. Land surface temperature on June 30, 2021 Figure 30. Tree canopy cover by neighbourhood area (based on 2021 census data) 38 Urban Forest Management Strategy 4 Urban Forest Management Framework 39 Urban Forest Management Strategy Policies and plans that guide urban forest management Urban forest management in the City of Maple Ridge is subject to a range of legislation, policies, standards, and guidelines. These policy tools help establish the strategic directions and framework that influence how trees and forests are managed within the city. This section provides an overview of the most relevant and critical documents informing urban forest planning and management in Maple Ridge: 1. Enabling legislation – gives cities the power to make regulations about trees 2. Guiding policies and plans – establish strategic visions and framework for Maple Ridge’s trees, forests, and lands 3. Associated strategies – do not typically focus on trees and forests but influence the implementation and outcomes of urban forest policies 4. Bylaws and other policy tools – guide the implementation of the City’s relevant guiding policies Enabling Legislation Local Government Act Community Charter Guiding Policy and Plans Local Government Act Community Charter Local Government Act Community Charter Oicial Community Plan (OCP) Parks, Recreation, and Culture Master Plan Council Strategic Plan 2023-2026 Bylaws and Policies Tree Protection and Management Bylaw Zoning Bylaw Watercourse Protection Bylaw Development Permit Area (DPA) Guidelines Municipal Enhancement & Landscaping Guidelines Subdivision Bylaw Natural Features Development Permit (DP) Environmental Development Permit (DP) Associated Plans, Policies, and Guidelines Environmental Management Strategy The Green Infrastructure Management Strategy Strategic Transportation Plan Integrated Stormwater Management Plans Areas Plan Figure 31. Policies and plans that guide urban forest management 40 Urban Forest Management Strategy Enabling legislation In British Columbia, the Local Government Act and Community Charter grants municipalities authority to manage trees within their boundaries. This includes adopting official community plans which may include tree policies, passing bylaws to regulate tree removals, protection, and planting, and adjusting taxation and enforcing regulations. Guiding policies and plans Maple Ridge’s Official Community Plan (OCP) outlines the long-term vision for the city’s growth and development. It recognizes the importance of natural features, including trees and forests, in building the community’s character and enhancing residents’ quality of life and overall well-being. The OCP provides a range of goals and policies to promote and guide the preservation of mature trees, forests, soils, and vegetation. It also addresses the management of forests and woodland areas, enhancement of greenway corridors and connectivity, environmentally sensitive area protection, climate mitigation and forest fire hazard mitigation. These goals and policies provide a framework to guide the City’s efforts on environmental protection and restoration while accommodating growth and development of the City. The Area Plans, as part of the OCP, focus on unique contexts within designated areas, providing detailed guidelines for land use, density, form, character, and development pacing. Currently, Maple Ridge has Area Plans for four designated areas, including Albion, Hammond, Silver Valley, and Town Centre. Though each Area Plan may have distinct focuses, they all address issues relevant to urban forest management, such as preservation of existing trees and vegetation during development, creating landscaping areas, green space and corridors connecting parks and natural areas. In 2023, the City of Maple Ridge endorsed the Parks, Recreation, and Culture Master Plan, a comprehensive document that outlines the City’s vision and strategies for delivering parks, recreation, cultural services over the next decade. The Master Plan specifically recommends to “undertake an Urban Forest Management Strategy to more broadly guide preservation of the tree canopy in Maple Ridge and responsible recreation use of forested areas within the city”. Additionally, the Master Plan includes other strategies and recommendations that will influence or facilitate the implementation of the Urban Forest Management Strategy. For example, it recommends developing a Park Acquisition Strategy and sustaining Neighbourhood Park provision at 0.69 hectare per 1,000 residents. The Council Strategic Plan 2023-2026 outlines the City’s collective vision and priorities over the next four years. It recognizes the importance of a healthy natural environment and the vital role of tree sand forests in Maple Ridge. The Plan also emphasizes the imperative to protect the health of the natural environment as a strategic priorities, Climate Leadership and Environmental Stewardship. 41 Urban Forest Management Strategy Associated strategies The Environmental Management Strategy, initiated in 2012 as directed by the OCP, aimed at preserving and enhancing Maple Ridge’s natural assets. The Strategy includes goals and strategies supportive of protection and management of trees in Maple Ridge. Developing a Tree Protection and Management Bylaw is one of the high priority actions. The Green Infrastructure Management Strategy aims to provide a roadmap for incorporating green infrastructure into various aspects of city planning and management, such as municipal operations, capital projects, area plans, and development design practices. The urban forest is recognized as existing natural/green infrastructure assets. The Strategy include specific actions supportive of urban forest management, such as evaluating natural capital services (ecosystem services) offered by green infrastructure and drafting municipal asset management policy that integrate green infrastructure along with traditional capital assets in capital investment decisions and municipal finance planning. The Integrated Stormwater Management Plans provides a comprehensive review of watersheds and drainage systems in Maple Ridge, as well as guidance and information on protecting and enhancing the overall health and natural resources of these watersheds and drainage systems. These plans recognize green infrastructure (including trees) as an integral part of sustainable stormwater management and present recommendations specifically relevant to the urban forest, such as retrofitting street trees in developed areas to reduce runoff, especially during wet winter months. The Strategic Transportation Plan is a strategic document providing guidance on Maple Ridge’s transportation policies and infrastructure investment over a 30-year period. It recognizes the traffic calming effect of street trees and other features and includes provisions for streetscape and pedestrian realm enhancement to promote active transportation. 42 Urban Forest Management Strategy City-owned street trees Private trees in riparian and other ESAsPrivate yard treesTrees in landscaped parks Public Private KEY Planting new trees Protecting trees Replacing trees Maintaining trees Urban forest management theme Trees are occasionally planted in conservation areas as stewardship opportunities arise. Tree Protection and Management Bylaw protects trees of 20 cm DBH or higher in Conservation Area or on City owned properties. No formally adopted policy guides the replacement of trees in City-owned forested land or conservation areas. Infrastructure Inspections Policy Manual defines inspection area, cycle and priority for trees in parks and along streets and trails. Infrastructure Inspections Policy Manual defines inspection area, cycle and priority for trees in parks and along streets and trails. Subdivision Bylaw requires a minimum 1 year of maintenance period by developers before handing over to the City. Infrastructure Inspections Policy Manual defines inspection area, cycle and priority for trees in parks and along streets and trails. Tree Protection and Management Bylaw forbids topping of trees except for special circumstances and requires verification by City Arborist before permitting removal of a hazardous tree. Trees of any size can’t be pruned without a Tree Permit The Environmental DP application process requires a 3- to 5-year maintenance agreement for replaced trees. No formally adopted policy guides the replacement of trees in landscaped parks. Street Tree Specifications specifies that developers shall replace all trees that die, are damaged, or have failed to grow satisfactory as determined by the Certified Arborist during the warranty period. Replacement planting is required by the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw according to the size of removed tree(s). Cash-in-lieu is required if replacement planting is not feasible. Incentive for tree retention on lots larger than 0.5 ha. Zoning bylaw allows density bonus for RS-2 Single-detached suburban residential for tree preservation via park dedication. Replacement planting is required by the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw according to the size of removed tree(s). Cash-in-lieu is required if replacement planting is not feasible. Incentive for tree retention on lots larger than 0.5ha. The Environmental DP application may require tree management strategy including replacement and enhancement of removed/damaged trees within DPAs. The Tree Protection and Management Bylaw forbids removal or damage of any park trees or trees on a highway unless the work is undertake by or on behalf of the City. Tree Protection and Management Bylaw forbids removal or damage of any street trees unless the work is undertake by or on behalf of the City. Tree protection fencing is required for newly planted trees by developers during or prior to construction, as required by the Street Tree Specification. The Tree Protection and Management Bylaw restrict tree removals based on lot size and tree density. For lots smaller than 0.5 ha, removals of “permit trees”, “significant tree” and vegetation in a Significant Tree Stand requires a tree permit. For lots larger than 0.5 ha, tree permits are required if there are fewer than 40 trees per ha on site. Trees larger than 70cm in DBH is more strictly protected. For sites with large-scale development/clearing, Tree Protection and Management Bylaw may require an arborist report or a tree management plan. Other plans, such as Groundwater Impact Assessment, may be required as per the site condition. Tree protection barriers and fencing are required by Tree Protection and Management Bylaw. Zoning Bylaw also specifies requirement on tree and shrub protection. Environmental (including Natural Features and Watercourse Protection) Development Permit (DP) applies to development on site with natural features or in environmentally sensitive areas and may impose additional requirements, such as a tree review, an environmental impact assessment or an arborist assessment on unique or mature tree stands or where tree stands have an average DBH > 25cm within environmental DPAs outside of setback areas. The Tree Protection and Management Bylaw forbids removing trees of any size in Conservation Area without a tree permit. New trees are planted in parks as they are built and developed. Street trees may be planted by a developer as required during subdivision, following the Subdivision Bylaw. Exemptions may be given to development in rural areas. Subdivision Bylaw, Street Tree Specifications, and Design and Construction Documents defines the installation specifics such as tree size, type, and location, as well as soil type, volume and quality. Trees in City-owned forests and other conservation areas Zoning Bylaw defines the minimal % of lot area to be landscaped with a permeable surface, as well as other tree planting related requirements for landscaping and screening purposes (e.g., planting native, water-conserving species, max. spacing of trees, and dimension of landscape strip by land use) The Municipal Enhancement and Landscaping Standards specify guidelines on landscaping and planting to be followed by developers and contractors, as part of the Environmental Development Permit requirements. Public Private KEY How trees are regulated in Maple Ridge - Bylaws and other policy tools Refer to Appendix 1 for more detail. 43 Urban Forest Management Strategy City-owned street trees Private trees in riparian and other ESAsPrivate yard treesTrees in landscaped parks Public Private KEY Planting new trees Protecting trees Replacing trees Maintaining trees Urban forest management theme Trees are occasionally planted in conservation areas as stewardship opportunities arise. Tree Protection and Management Bylaw protects trees of 20 cm DBH or higher in Conservation Area or on City owned properties. No formally adopted policy guides the replacement of trees in City-owned forested land or conservation areas. Infrastructure Inspections Policy Manual defines inspection area, cycle and priority for trees in parks and along streets and trails. Infrastructure Inspections Policy Manual defines inspection area, cycle and priority for trees in parks and along streets and trails. Subdivision Bylaw requires a minimum 1 year of maintenance period by developers before handing over to the City. Infrastructure Inspections Policy Manual defines inspection area, cycle and priority for trees in parks and along streets and trails. Tree Protection and Management Bylaw forbids topping of trees except for special circumstances and requires verification by City Arborist before permitting removal of a hazardous tree. Trees of any size can’t be pruned without a Tree Permit The Environmental DP application process requires a 3- to 5-year maintenance agreement for replaced trees. No formally adopted policy guides the replacement of trees in landscaped parks. Street Tree Specifications specifies that developers shall replace all trees that die, are damaged, or have failed to grow satisfactory as determined by the Certified Arborist during the warranty period. Replacement planting is required by the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw according to the size of removed tree(s). Cash-in-lieu is required if replacement planting is not feasible. Incentive for tree retention on lots larger than 0.5 ha. Zoning bylaw allows density bonus for RS-2 Single-detached suburban residential for tree preservation via park dedication. Replacement planting is required by the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw according to the size of removed tree(s). Cash-in-lieu is required if replacement planting is not feasible. Incentive for tree retention on lots larger than 0.5ha. The Environmental DP application may require tree management strategy including replacement and enhancement of removed/damaged trees within DPAs. The Tree Protection and Management Bylaw forbids removal or damage of any park trees or trees on a highway unless the work is undertake by or on behalf of the City. Tree Protection and Management Bylaw forbids removal or damage of any street trees unless the work is undertake by or on behalf of the City. Tree protection fencing is required for newly planted trees by developers during or prior to construction, as required by the Street Tree Specification. The Tree Protection and Management Bylaw restrict tree removals based on lot size and tree density. For lots smaller than 0.5 ha, removals of “permit trees”, “significant tree” and vegetation in a Significant Tree Stand requires a tree permit. For lots larger than 0.5 ha, tree permits are required if there are fewer than 40 trees per ha on site. Trees larger than 70cm in DBH is more strictly protected. For sites with large-scale development/clearing, Tree Protection and Management Bylaw may require an arborist report or a tree management plan. Other plans, such as Groundwater Impact Assessment, may be required as per the site condition. Tree protection barriers and fencing are required by Tree Protection and Management Bylaw. Zoning Bylaw also specifies requirement on tree and shrub protection. Environmental (including Natural Features and Watercourse Protection) Development Permit (DP) applies to development on site with natural features or in environmentally sensitive areas and may impose additional requirements, such as a tree review, an environmental impact assessment or an arborist assessment on unique or mature tree stands or where tree stands have an average DBH > 25cm within environmental DPAs outside of setback areas. The Tree Protection and Management Bylaw forbids removing trees of any size in Conservation Area without a tree permit. New trees are planted in parks as they are built and developed. Street trees may be planted by a developer as required during subdivision, following the Subdivision Bylaw. Exemptions may be given to development in rural areas. Subdivision Bylaw, Street Tree Specifications, and Design and Construction Documents defines the installation specifics such as tree size, type, and location, as well as soil type, volume and quality. Trees in City-owned forests and other conservation areas Zoning Bylaw defines the minimal % of lot area to be landscaped with a permeable surface, as well as other tree planting related requirements for landscaping and screening purposes (e.g., planting native, water-conserving species, max. spacing of trees, and dimension of landscape strip by land use) The Municipal Enhancement and Landscaping Standards specify guidelines on landscaping and planting to be followed by developers and contractors, as part of the Environmental Development Permit requirements. PublicPrivate KEY How trees are regulated in Maple Ridge - Bylaws and other policy tools 44 Urban Forest Management Strategy Urban forest management program The Facilities, Parks and Properties department within the Parks, Recreation & Culture Division manages the City’s street and park tree assets. These assets include over 14,000 intensively managed trees along streets and in parks, 210 hectares of tree canopy in municipal parks, 295 hectares of tree canopy shading over streets, and 695 hectares of canopy found on other City-owned properties. The core urban forestry team consists of an urban forestry supervisor, a field arborist, and a grounds worker. Together, they are responsible for tree planting, young tree care, emergency and hazard mitigation, service call responses, risk inspections, and tree removals on City-owned properties, including street rights-of-way, municipal parks, and other City-owned land. PROGRAM OVERVIEW 45 Urban Forest Management Strategy The City receives an average of 808 tree related service requests per year, based on data from 2018 to 2022. A significant proportion of these service requests are related to boulevard trees (accounting for 39%-49% of the total received service requests), green belt trees (21%-31%), and park trees (23%-27%). The volume of tree related service requests has been increasing steadily since 2018, reaching its peak in 2021. During the same period, the proportion of boulevard tree-related requests has been on the rise, while the percentage of greenbelt or parks has remained stable or slightly decreased (Figure 33). Figure 32. Tree related service requests from 2018 to 2023 Figure 33. Proportion of boulevard, greenbelt, and park related service requests from 2018 to 2023 46 Urban Forest Management Strategy Urban forest report card The Urban Forest Report Card provides a summary of the assessment of each indicator in Maple Ridge’s urban forest management program against an optimal outcome. It provides a comprehensive assessment of areas where the City is performing well and where the Urban Forest Management Strategy should guide efforts for further improvement. Appendix 2 contains a more detailed summary of the report card. PLAN AND ADAPT Poor Fair Good Optimal Municipal infrastructure asset management Awareness of the urban forest Relative tree canopy cover Interdepartmental and municipal agency cooperation Municipal urban forestry program capacity Clear and defensible urban forest assessment and goals Municipality-wide management plan Municipal-wide biodiversity or green network strategy Funding to implement a strategy PLANT Poor Fair Good Optimal Selection and procurement of stock in cooperation with nursery industry City tree planting and replacement program Ecosystem services targeted in tree planting projects and landscaping Development requirement to plant trees on private land Equity in planting program delivery Forest restoration/native species planting Streetscape and servicing specications and standards for planting trees MANAGE Poor Fair Good Optimal Tree inventory Species diversity of inventoried trees Knowledge of trees on private property Natural areas inventory Knowledge of health condition of inventoried trees Age/size cohort distribution of inventoried trees Maintenance of inventoried trees Emergency response planning Tree risk management Waste biomass utilization Pest and Disease management PROTECT Poor Fair Good Optimal Regulate sensitive ecosystems, soils or permeability through private development Regulate protection and replacement of private and City trees Standards of tree protection/care observed Cooperation with utilities Internal protocols guide City tree or sensitive ecosystems protection PARTNER Poor Fair Good Optimal Citizen involvement/neighbourhood action Regional collaboration Urban forest research Involvement of land holders Climate suitability of inventoried trees 2023 URBAN FOREST REPORT CARD POOR F A I R GOOD O P T I M A L In progress Insucient data In progress In progress In progress Insucient data Insucient data Insucient data Carbon footprint tracking 47 Urban Forest Management Strategy 5 What We Heard 48 Urban Forest Management Strategy Public engagement is key to the success of an effective urban forest management strategy. The City of Maple Ridge has initiated a two-phase engagement process to ensure that a diverse range of voices and perspectives contribute to the Strategy’s development, and that the community’s values and needs are reflected in the Strategy. The first phase, completed in October 2023, aimed to understand the community’s values, vision, and priorities. The second phase of engagement took place in spring 2024 to offer the community opportunities to provide feedback on the draft Strategy. The section below highlights the public engagement outcomes and Appendix 3 provides a complete summary. Phase 1 Engagement highlights Urban forest vision Participants were asked to imagine how they would like the Maple Ridge’s urban forest to look like in 20 years. The overwhelming consensus was a desire to have more trees in the city to prioritize a healthy urban forest composed of mixed and native tree species that will be climate resilient and can provide wildlife habitat and biodiversity. Other ideas raised were: • Increasing accessibility to green spaces • Integrating urban forest with urban planning • Preserving large or mature trees • Promoting community • Providing food • Managing stormwater • Ensuring safety against wildfire The first phase of engagement reached more than 2000 people, including 255 survey participants, 12 Parks, Recreation, and Culture committee members, 225 open house attendees, 85 mapping tool submissions, and 1500 people from the project page’s engagement analytics. Of the 255 survey participants, the majority have resided in Maple Ridge for 10 or more years. The most represented age group is between 35-96 years old. Figure 34. Word cloud showing the most common words used by respondents to describe their vision of the urban forest for the next 20 years 49 Urban Forest Management Strategy Imagine it is the year 2050, what do you want the Maple Ridge’s urban forest to look like? “An urban forest that is healthy, vibrant, well-maintained, full of animals such as birds and habitats for other animals like rabbits, coyotes, and squirrels. Lots of shade to keep the road and grass and streets cool.” “I would like native species of plants and trees, less grass and more wildflowers. A mixture of plants, bushes and trees that support insects and animals. If a photo was taken from the air, you would see at least 75 percent trees and only 25 percent roads and housing.” “Beautiful, natural integration of nature into the urban environment.” “Healthy, robust and resilient!” “Mix of trees that attract all different birds and wildlife.” Priority actions for tree regulations Figure 35. Survey participants’ levels of support for tree regulations of private property Survey participants reported mixed levels of support for potential changes to tree policy on private property (Figure 35). Most respondents were supportive of policy changes that would prevent significant canopy loss, retain healthy or very large trees, protect trees from damage, or provide cash for the City to plant a tree when it is not possible to plant a replacement tree on-site. Participants were more opposed to policy changes that would generally allow property owners to remove trees with the provision that they replaced them, or retained some on the property. 50 Urban Forest Management Strategy 91% of survey respondents favoured increasing tree canopy cover over the next 20 years. A small proportion (7%) of respondents were happy with the current canopy level, and 2% preferred a decreased canopy cover. Satisfaction with current service levels When asked about the City’s current urban forest management, residents expressed varying degrees of satisfaction (Figure 36). While many appreciated the City’s response to storm and debris cleanup, there were more neutral or dissatisfied responses to other levels of services such as pest and disease control and tree pruning. Participants were most dissatisfied with the level of public education and tree protection and preservation provided by the City. To provide the level of service that respondents preferred, 73% supported increasing the amount of funding allocated for urban forest management. Figure 36. Satisfaction levels with current service levels for tree City-owned trees (street trees, trees in parks, and trees in conservation areas) 51 Urban Forest Management Strategy In Phase 2 Engagement, approximately 370 individuals participated in the online survey or the virtual open house to provide their feedback on the draft Strategy. Among the 367 survey respondents, 77% were residents of Maple Ridge, 54% were in the 35-64 age bracket, and 74% were homeowners. Nearly half of the survey participants had engaged in Phase 1 of the consultation process. The infographic below summarizes the highlights of the Phase 2 engagement results. Phase 2 Engagement highlights 52 Urban Forest Management Strategy Maple Ridge’s urban forest vision statement was informed by the first phase of engagement and is: “Maple Ridge boasts a thriving, resilient and climate adapted urban forest that is essential to community health and well-being, provides high-value recreational opportunities, supports ecological health and biodiversity, offers cost-effective climate solutions, and improves livability for all residents.” Support for the vision Participants expressed strong support for the draft vision. A total of 93% of participants agreed that the draft vision captured all the essential elements, while only 4% disagreed. Similarly, 95% expressed agreement with the overall direction provided by the vision, goals, and target in the draft Strategy. Figure 37. Ranking of draft goals, reflecting respondents’ perceived importance Priority of goals and strategies Survey participants were asked to prioritize goals and strategies outlined in the draft Strategy (Figure 37). The majority of survey participants prioritized Goal 1, which focuses on protecting and expanding the urban forest, with over 71% ranking it as their top priority. Goal 2, emphasizing the integration and adaptation of the Strategy for better implementation, was considered the second most important, supported by 52% of participants. Goal 3 and 4, focusing on urban forest management and partnerships respectively, were ranked as lower priorities by most participants. Over 80% of participants rated all proposed strategies as high or medium priority. The top ranked strategies include: • Update bylaws, policies, and guidelines to protect and expand the urban forest • Plant trees to expand the urban forest to improve climate resilience and equity • Protect and restore forest lands to support biodiversity and healthy ecosystem functioning Feedback on the draft Strategy Overall, participants were satisfied with the draft Strategy. Of the survey participants, 90% were satisfied with the information provided about the Strategy. Specifically, 98% understood the content, 96% found the data and metrics clear, and 96% indicated that they had learned new information about Maple Ridge’s urban forest. 53 Urban Forest Management Strategy 6 Planning for the Future: Vision, Goals and Targets 54 Urban Forest Management Strategy The urban forest vision A 20-year vision for Maple Ridge’s urban forest has been drafted based on findings from community and staff engagement, and policy and background review. The vision guides the Strategy’s action plan: Urban forest goals Four goals will guide the City’s work towards achieving the vision. These goals cover thematic areas where specific strategies and actions are outlined for implementation. Maple Ridge boasts a thriving, resilient, and climate adapted urban forest that is essential to community health and well-being, provides high-value recreational opportunities, supports ecological health and biodiversity, offers cost-effective climate solutions, and improves livability for all residents. 55 Urban Forest Management Strategy The urban forest target Factors considered in setting a canopy target Canopy cover can serve as a valuable performance measure to track progress towards achieving overarching vision and goals for the urban forest. Setting a specific canopy target offers a clear and measurable aim for the city to strive towards. This target not only connects the vision to a measurable metric but also serves as a driving force behind the implementation of the Urban Forest Management Strategy. Determining an appropriate canopy target is not a one-size-fits-all endeavor. Currently, there is no consensus on what constitutes an optimal level of canopy cover. Communities, including Maple Ridge, vary significantly in terms of character, values, climate conditions, development patterns, population, and land use. Therefore, the most effective approach to setting a canopy target involves a nuanced understanding of the community’s context, tailoring the goal to align with their specific needs and characteristics. Setting a canopy target relies on a comprehensive understanding of the current conditions of the urban forest and a foresight into how canopy cover is likely to change over time. To decide the canopy scenarios for Maple Ridge, the following steps were taken: 1. Measure current canopy cover across all OCP designated land uses within urban areas 2. Identify where and how much development is expected to occur and how canopy cover in each area will likely change in 20-year timeframe 3. Forecast canopy cover across all OCP designated land uses in urban areas based on the anticipated development and possible urban forestry actions related to tree protection, planting, and replacement Recognizing the unique challenges and opportunities for urban forest management in Maple Ridge, including the city’s development patterns, existing land uses, and community aspirations, three distinct canopy scenarios were developed: Assumes no changes to current policies and practices, 30% of forested areas within urban areas are developed under current zoning, and tree retention, removal, and replacement follows trends from previous years. Scenario 1 Status Quo Assumes no changes to current tree retention requirements, but planting requirements and incentives are increased in selected areas zoned for commercial, industrial, residential, parks and green spaces, road rights-of-way, and other public uses (e.g., schools, and civic services). Scenario 2 No Net Loss Assumes enhanced tree retention requirements on large-scale development sites and increased planting efforts. This scenario aims not only to mitigate development related tree loss but also to achieve a net canopy gain. Scenario 3 Canopy Gain 56 Urban Forest Management Strategy Figure 38. Canopy scenarios for Maple Ridge (provisional) Maple Ridge’s canopy cover target Maple Ridge has set a target to increase its canopy cover within urban areas from 38% to 40% by 2050. ~55 ha 34% SCENARIO 2 no net loss stable/small gain SCENARIO 1 status quo gradual decline ~160 ha canopy replaced with gains in industrial, low- density residential, parks and green space, institutional, and roadways- 4%No change 38%projected by 2050: ~330 private tree + ~90 public tree planting per year (assuming 50-65 m² canopy area per tree 25 years after planting) ~1240 private tree + ~370 public tree planting per year (assuming 50-65 m² canopy area per tree 25 years after planting) ~253 ha 40% SCENARIO 3 net growth gain canopy replaced with gains in commercial, industrial, low- density residential, parks and green space, institutional, and roadways+ 2% ~1980 private tree + ~370 public tree planting per year (assuming 50-65 m² canopy area per tree 25 years after planting) canopy replaced CURRENT CONDITION Canopy cover: 38% Anticipated canopy loss from now to 2050: 193 ha 38% 40% 38% 34% Scenario 1: Status Quo Scenario 2: Not Net Loss Scenario 3: Canopy Gain 57 Urban Forest Management Strategy 7 Achieving Our Goals: Strengths, Challenges, Strategies 58 Urban Forest Management Strategy Overview of Urban Forest Goals and Strategies 59 Urban Forest Management Strategy GOAL 1: Protect and Expand the Urban Forest This goal emphasizes preserving Maple Ridge’s abundant urban forest resources, particularly the mature canopy in existing forested lands, while also expanding the urban forest in more developed areas. Preserving these natural assets alongside urban development requires innovative strategies to maintain existing trees and ensure new ones have sufficient soil and space, safeguarding them against construction damage. Our strengths Commitment to the natural environment and green infrastructure: Maple Ridge shows a strong commitment to protecting and expanding the natural environment through policies like the tree bylaw and development policies. This Urban Forest Management Strategy and the recently completed Green Infrastructure Management Strategy serve as comprehensive frameworks, guiding the integration of green infrastructure into municipal operations, capital projects, and development design practices. Urban trees and forests have the potential to play a greater role in stormwater and heat mitigation throughout the city. Public and policy support: Community surveys highlight a deep appreciation for the natural environment, indicating strong public support for urban forestry initiatives. Strategic plans, such as the Climate Action Plan, further provide a robust foundation for enhancing climate resilience and equity through tree planting and urban forest expansion. Rich urban forest resources: The city is home to a rich urban forest, especially within existing forested lands, crucial for biodiversity, clean air, water, and recreational spaces. The City acknowledges the importance of preserving natural areas and wildlife corridors and enhancing recreational networks through careful planning. Our challenges Climate change impacts: The urban forest is under threat from invasive species and the impacts of climate change, such as extreme weather and temperature fluctuations. Urban forests are susceptible to impacts from summer drought, heat waves, windstorms, and new pests and diseases. Increased frequency of summer drought has increased mortality of young and old trees. Species such as western redcedar and western hemlock are dying throughout the Pacific Northwest. Warmer temperatures and stressed trees also favor insect pests, which may lead to more frequent and severe pest outbreaks. These impacts necessitate adopting more climate-resilient urban forestry planning tools and practices to ensure that existing forests are climate resilient and continue to deliver the benefits needed by the community. Availability of climate-adapted nursery stock: In selecting and procuring climate-adapted nursery stock, cities face the challenge of predicting future climate conditions and trialling tree species expected to thrive in these conditions. Limited availability of diverse, climate-resilient nursery stock can be a barrier, as nurseries may not always grow the needed varieties. 60 Urban Forest Management Strategy Balancing development with conservation: The city is at a pivotal juncture where population growth and housing needs necessitate more housing development and supporting infrastructure. While redevelopment in largely built-up or impervious areas may provide chances to enhance tree canopy, greenfield development inevitably involves site clearing. To preserve the City’s distinctive tree character and relatively high tree canopy cover, the city must explore innovative policy tools and approaches to address potential canopy loss resulting from greenfield developments. Ensuring adequate space and soil for trees: As urban areas become more compact, the expansion of buildings and paved surfaces reduces the available area for soil and vegetation. Balancing the growth of trees in these increasingly dense settings, without causing issues or conflicts with infrastructure, becomes more complex. Urban planning must navigate a variety of goals to create livable and healthy spaces for residents. These goals can sometimes conflict, particularly in areas with limited space. For instance, the same area required for tree growth might be needed for constructing new accessible pathways. When such conflicts arise, city planners need to prioritize needs and devise innovative strategies to achieve the best possible outcomes. Choosing the right tree species and locations is also essential to prevent future issues and ensure trees have a long and healthy life. Maintaining biodiversity: Biodiversity describes the diversity of genes, lifeforms, and ecosystems on earth. Biodiversity underpins many important ecosystem services provided by urban forests. Trees play a critical role in supporting high levels of biodiversity because they provide structure for many organisms and different habitat needs. To ensure the preservation of native habitats and ecosystems, future planning needs to maintain forest environments and connectivity between habitats as the city continues to grow and develop. When trees cannot be accommodated in urban spaces, other forms of greening and green infrastructure can be encouraged with development to support biodiversity. Implications of recent legislation change on the urban forest The Government of British Columbia’s proposed legislation, Bill 44: Housing Statutes (Residential Development) Amendment Act, 2023, will bring about a transformation in single-family neighbourhoods, compelling municipalities with populations exceeding 5,000 to allow small- scale, multi-unit housing on traditional single- family and duplex lots. The legislation aims to streamline zoning processes, addressing long- term housing needs, and promoting affordable housing. However, it may also pose challenges for tree retention and replacement when lots with a single home are converted to multiple dwellings with larger building footprints and high lot coverage. 61 Urban Forest Management Strategy Tree density requirements Maple Ridge has requirements to regulate the growth of the urban forest through several bylaws, such as the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw (or “Tree Bylaw” for short). The Tree Bylaw requires a minimum of 40 trees per hectare on all private lots either through retention of existing trees or planting replacement trees. Other cities in Metro Vancouver use tree density requirement to ensure a certain level of tree canopy is maintained on private lots. For example, the Township of Langley requires a minimum of 30 replacement trees per acre (i.e. 74 trees per hectare) through its Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw. Country Lane Development is a innovative urban development project in Maple Ridge that allows for higher housing density while nurturing an abundant tree canopy cover. The project features smaller lots with laneway parking, reduced front and back setbacks, and the addition of more building floors (up to three floors). These measures ensure the floor area per house remains uncompromised while preserving adequate space for yard and street trees. Strategies to achieve our goal Strategy 1. Update and enforce bylaws, policies and guidelines to protect and expand the urban forest Strategy 2. Protect and restore forest lands to support healthy ecosystem functioning Strategy 3. Plant and expand the urban forest to improve climate resilience and equity 62 Urban Forest Management Strategy Examples of new tools for tree retention Seattle offers a compelling example of rebalancing zoning codes in favour of tree retention. Seattle has implemented a system called “Exceptional Tree Zoning”. Exceptional trees are designated heritage trees or trees meeting a species-specific size threshold decided by order and receive additional protection during development review. Seattle’s zoning codes mandates deviations from Ottawa’s R4 Zone Aggregated Soft Landscaped Area height and setback to retain exceptional trees. It is clear to developers that they will be required to retain large and mature significant trees. Guides and rules have been set up for developers to understand how they can vary from zoning code for retention of an exceptional tree. Similarly, Ottawa recently updated its zoning code, introducing a requirement for a “minimum aggregated soft landscape area”. These permeable areas have defined minimum lengths and widths to be sufficient for supporting the growth of trees, even in cases where development results in initial removals of large trees. Example of landscape incentives The Toronto Green Standard is the City of Toronto’s sustainable design requirements for new private and city-owned developments. Initially introduced in 2005 as a voluntary standard, the Standard now has been structured into a tiered program that offers a combination of mandatory and voluntary elements. Projects that fulfill higher tiers of performance are eligible for a refund on development charges paid to the City. The Toronto Green Standard support urban forestry practices through requirements on: • Soil volume on site and in adjacent public boulevard • Tree placement and spacing • Watering and maintenance of trees after installation The Standard also requires all new developments to increase tree canopy, soil volumes, and tree watering, promote native species, and exclude invasive species. Additional tree planting or ecological restoration is voluntary and can be used to qualify for a development charge refund. 63 Urban Forest Management Strategy What is a biodiversity conservation strategy? Biodiversity Conservation Strategies provide long- term plans to protect and restore ecosystems. It is a common tool for municipalities to guide their efforts on the protection and restoration of critical ecosystem values and functions. The City of Surrey has implemented a Biodiversity Conservation Strategy with supporting policies to preserve biodiversity over the long term. The Strategy establishes a Green Infrastructure Network (GIN), a connected system of protected areas, including forests, wetlands, parks, watercourses, agricultural land, and urban environments, functioning as important habitats and connecting corridors. Policy and management recommendations in the Strategy also support the City’s other strategic initiatives on environmental protection, green infrastructure and sustainable development. What is a forest management plan? Unlike an urban forest management strategy that addresses the management of urban forests at a city-wide scale, a forest management plan is focused on a specific forest area and the operational management needed to maintain values such as public safety and ecological health. A forest management plan typically establishes long-term management values and objectives to guide operational management decisions about the level of maintenance service provided in a specific forest area. It also includes standards and guidelines on monitoring and reporting requirements, such as forest health reporting and monitoring, renewal and protection, and wayfinding and trail standards. 64 Urban Forest Management Strategy Importance of soil volume and quality for tree health Soil volume is crucial for the health of the urban forest because it directly impacts the availability of essential nutrients, water, and oxygen to the trees. Bylaws, like subdivision and servicing bylaws, play a crucial role in guaranteeing sufficient soil volume for street trees. The table below summarizes the recommended minimum soil volume for street trees in the Metro Vancouver’s Tree Regulation Toolkit30. TREE SIZE APPROXIMATE SURFACE AREA (M2) OF SOIL REQUIRED PER TREE (ASSUMING 1 M SOIL DEPTH) On ground Under hardscape soil cells* Under hardscape structural soil** Small tree canopy (spread ≤ 6 m)8 x1.1 x5 Medium tree canopy (spread ≤ 10 m)20 x1.1 x5 Large tree canopy (spread > 10 m)35 x1.1 x5 *Soil cells are 92% soil, **Structural soil is 20% soil In a dense urban environment, the minimum soil volume is not always feasible. Alternative solutions such as structural soils, soil cells, and stormwater retention methods can support healthy tree growth. Structural soils are a mix of mineral and organic matter that meet engineering requirements while allowing root growth. They can provide a bridge between soil volumes for growing trees. Soil cells are used in high pavement areas to provide growing space to trees that are otherwise contained in an inhospitable landscape. Soil amendments are another increasingly important part of planting site creation. Soil amendments include familiar organic and inorganic fertilizers and mulches, and innovative additions like beneficial soil bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi, and biochar. More cities are trialling soil amendments to improve soil quality and tree growth outcomes. From left to right: Bioswale provides supplemental watering to landscape trees installed in private on-site parking (Surrey) Soil cell installation to extend planting site volume (Winnipeg) Structural soil installation to bridge planting strip with soil behind sidewalk (Vancouver) 65 Urban Forest Management Strategy This goal aims to embed the urban forest vision, goals, and targets into broader city and regional planning for enhanced understanding, support, and coordinated implementation. Commitment to ongoing monitoring and adaptation is critical, alongside ensuring sufficient staffing and funding for the urban forest program. This approach lays the groundwork for the successful execution of the Urban Forest Management Strategy. Our strengths Policy and regulatory framework: Maple Ridge possesses a robust policy and regulatory foundation that supports the integration of urban forest management into city and regional strategic initiatives. The commitment to climate resilience and biodiversity aligns with regional goals, fostering opportunities for collaborative and integrative efforts. Integrated planning across City departments: Adopting comprehensive planning and policy approaches, and continuing to have strong interdepartmental collaboration, improves the likelihood that the Urban Forest Management Strategy will be implemented successfully. Opportunities to broaden regional collaboration: Regional initiatives, such as Metro Vancouver’s Nature and Ecosystem’s Roadmap, Urban Forest Climate Adaptation Initiatives and Regional Ecosystem Connectivity Initiatives, may present opportunities to leverage regional partnerships for urban forest management. Our challenges Incomplete integration: While existing frameworks are strong, they may not be fully integrated across all city and regional initiatives. The necessity for actions like incorporating canopy targets into the Official Community Plan (OCP) and establishing sub-canopy targets by land use suggests gaps in the current integration of urban forest goals into broader city planning and regional strategies. Resource limitations: Maple Ridge’s urban forest resource is managed by a core team of three staff. Existing funding and staffing levels may not suffice to support the ambitious goals of the Urban Forest Management Strategy. The necessity to review life-cycle costing and establish dedicated budgets for tree planting underscores the current resource constraints. Monitoring and reporting gaps: While some elements like canopy cover are now well- monitored, there is no formalized program to collect data to track performance on implementation or monitor change in the urban forest. The absence of formalized monitoring program could hamper adaptive management decisions. GOAL 2: Integrate and Adapt the Urban Forest Management Strategy 66 Urban Forest Management Strategy Strategies to achieve our goal Strategy 4. Integrate urban forest management into City and regional strategic initiatives Strategy 5. Achieve funding and staffing levels sufficient to implement the Strategy Strategy 6. Track and report progress to inform management decisions Funding opportunities The Federal Government’s Two Billion Trees (2BT) program aims to motivate and support new tree planting projects. By 2031 up to $3.2 billion will have been invested in tree planting efforts to plant two billion trees across Canada. While the 2BT program does not fund tree planting for private individuals, it can support municipalities under various funding streams. Tree Canada’s Community Tree grants support community greening, innovation and stewardship initiatives. Grant recipients, of which municipalities are eligible, receive funding and technical support to help start, upgrade, or achieve their greening goals. The Green Municipal Fund’s Growing Canada’s Community Canopies (GCCC) initiative is a new program that will support tree planting in and around communities across Canada for climate resilience and other social and environmental benefits. The initiative will launch in Spring 2024 and will provide tree-planting grants and strategic grants for planning and operational support to local governments and groups partnering with them. The initiative is funded by the Government of Canada’s 2 Billion Trees (2BT) program and is a partnership between the Green Municipal Fund and Tree Canada. 67 Urban Forest Management Strategy Integration with Green Infrastructure Pervious Surface Shallow rock beds captures and treats stormwater runo impervious surfaces Hardy shrubs provide habitat and capture runo Select drought tolerant & pest resistant trees Impervious Surface Bioretention street swales in Silver Valley exemplify the successful integration of trees as a crucial element of green infrastructure. This not only enhances the aesthetic appeal of the neighbourhood but also capturesnd euopenp mawuaapanpai ouauvnfh ubadm Sufnepawlhnehguptso uw p e du around climate action and the management of green infrastructure. 68 Urban Forest Management Strategy This goal emphasizes optimizing the benefits of trees while managing risks. It involves proactive care, such as regular pruning and health checks, and efficient responses to emergencies and service requests. Currently, Maple Ridge often reacts to issues as they arise, but the aim is to become more proactive, aligning with industry best practices for a healthier, longer-lasting urban forest. Our strengths GOAL 3: Manage and Sustain the Urban Forest Progress in natural asset management: Maple Ridge’s Green Infrastructure Strategy focuses on integrating natural assets like forests, streams, and bioengineered solutions into urban areas to enhance community health, livability, and sustainable development. The City is working to improve its natural asset management approaches. While the urban forest is not currently integrated into the City’s asset management system, the City recognizes trees as valuable natural assets and is exploring ways to advance natural asset management. Commitment to urban forestry and green infrastructure management: Maple Ridge demonstrates a strong dedication to urban forestry, with initiatives underway to align service levels with best practices. The city’s ongoing efforts to update its tree inventory and a robust tree maintenance program lay a solid foundation for future urban forest management. Our challenges Reactive approach to management: The City currently operates on a reactive basis for most urban forest services. This approach may lead to delayed or inefficient care, affecting the overall health and longevity of the urban forest. Threats to forest health: Climate change is bringing warmer, driers summers and increasing the frequency and severity of extreme weather events. At the same time, forest pests and invasive species may be more successful and abundant under warmer, milder conditions. These impacts are likely to increase the cost and complexity of urban forest management as trees will need more water to establish, more soil volume to maintain health and reach maturity, more frequent pruning to ensure they have good structure to resist damage. Forested areas may also need more management to mitigate wildfire risk, remove invasive species, and restore forest canopy in riparian areas to maintain stream health. Resource and capacity limitations: The City faces constraints in resources and staffing that limit capacity for tree pruning and risk inspections. The City needs more funds and staff to transition from a reactive to a proactive urban forest management cycle effectively. Limited risk management: Current service levels may not fully cover the management of risks associated with trees, especially in dealing with invasive species, pests, and the impact of extreme weather. A more comprehensive risk management policy is required to ensure tree health and community safety. Lack of integrated asset management and inventory data: The City needs to improve integration of the urban forest into its asset management system, developing a comprehensive tree inventory and tracking key data like tree mortality and planting rates, to enhance decision-making based on the urban forest’s value and condition. 69 Urban Forest Management Strategy Impacts of extreme weather events On November 4, 2023, a powerful windstorm swept through the Province of British Columbia, including Maple Ridge. The windstorm resulted in severe tree losses and damages to private properties, leaving at least one Maple Ridge family homeless in its wake. A colossal tree fell and crashed onto the family’s rental home. Significant tree losses and damages were reported across Metro Vancouver region. After a long and dry summer, trees are in inferior health, making them susceptible to extreme weather events like the powerful windstorm. This catastrophic event serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of proactive urban forest management and emergency planning. Name Common hosts Description Asian long- horned beetle Maple, poplar, birch, willow, elm, suspected other hardwoods Wood-boring beetle leaving large galleries and tunnels in sapwood and heartwood, disrupting water and nutrient flow inside the tree and causing the tree’s death. Multiple arrivals have been recorded in central Canada and the eastern and midwestern United States. Threats to Maple Ridge’s forest health Climate change is anticipated to increase the range of pests and diseases, and invasive species that can survive in Maple Ridge. In recent years, cities in Metro Vancouver have faced challenges from pest and disease outbreaks resulting in varying degrees of tree losses. For instance, in 2023, thousands of hemlock trees were affected and removed due to the hemlock looper moth infestation. The recent discovery of the Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) in Vancouver in April 2024, a pest known for its devastation on ash trees across eastern Canada and the United States, raises concerns about its potential impacts on urban forest populations. While Maple Ridge’s public tree inventory includes only ~400 ash trees (~3% of inventoried trees), additional trees likely exist on private landscapes and in areas outside the inventory. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency will monitor and control the spread of EAB to limit its impact on the region’s urban forest. For Maple Ridge, managing risks to forest health includes identifying invasive and pest threats, understanding their impacts and then planning for pest management. Some of the known forest health threats relevant to Maple Ridge include: Strategies to achieve our goals Strategy 7. Align levels of service for urban forest management with best practices Strategy 8. Manage tree risks for tree health and community safety 70 Urban Forest Management Strategy Name Common hosts Description Sooty bark disease Maple, horse chestnut, pacific dogwood, flowering plum Mat-forming fungus producing branch and foliar dieback. Notable for negative human health impacts from prolonged spore exposure causing inflammation of the lungs. Established in Washington and the BC; does well following hot summers. Emerald ash borer Ash Wood-boring beetle. Larval feeding in the cambium and phloem layers girdles the tree, causing mortality. Established in eastern Canada, recently detected in Vancouver. Lymantria moth Various Defoliator insect threatening most native and introduced broadleaved species and some conifers. Annual detections with active provincial eradication program in place. Ramorum blight Oak, rhododendron, arbutus, other shrubs and trees Oomycete (fungus-like) organism responsible for “sudden oak death” syndrome in large parts of Oregon and California. Varied pathology based on lifestage and host, with worst damage (mortality) on oak species. White pine blister rust Five-needled pines Fungus introduced to BC circa 1910. Attacks western white pine and other five-needled pines, generally causing mortality. Resistant cultivars have been trialed since the 1980s to help protect and reintroduce native five-needled pines to natural ecosystems. English ivy Various Imported garden plant now considered invasive. Climbs trees and gains significant weight, sometimes causing branch and stem breakage. Can smother seedlings. Himalayan blackberry Various Imported garden plant now considered invasive. Smothers native understorey plants and tree saplings. Western hemlock looper moth Western hemlock, Douglas-fir Defoliating insect targeting western hemlock trees. Long population cycles every 10-12 years with 2-3 years of activity. Defoliation in successive years can cause widespread tree mortality, as has occurred in the Lower Mainland since 2020. Armillaria root disease Douglas-fir, spruce, lodgepole pine, western white pine, western hemlock, western redcedar, Garry oak Aggressive root fungus causing death and decay. Several related species of fungus impact native and ornamental trees. White rot causing a rapid loss of wood strength, sometimes leading to sudden tree failure. Soil rhizomorphs remain infectious for several years. Laminated root disease Douglas-fir, true firs, mountain hemlock, western hemlock, western larch, Sitka spruce Root fungus targeting Douglas-fir, often causing root dieback and separation of annual growth rings. De-lamination leads to high rates of windthrow, often with little remaining root plate. Spreads via root contact. Annosus root disease Western hemlock, true firs, Douglas-fir, western redcedar, Sitka spruce Root fungus targeting western hemlock, often causing sudden tree failure due to spongy decay pockets. Spreads via spores on wind. Brittle cinder fungus Maple, oak, beech, horse chestnut, alder Crust-forming fungus that spreads through spores and root contact. Brown rot causing a loss of tensile strength in wood, sometimes causing shattered or snapped stems near tree base or from roots. Spreads via airborne spores and root contact. 71 Urban Forest Management Strategy Asset Management Principles for Urban Forests Trees in Maple Ridge’s urban forest are natural assets that provide value that exceeds the cost of their management. Trees require more early- and end-of-life care than they do in healthy middle age. As long as trees can reach healthy maturity, the benefits they provide will offset the costs of management and provide a net service value to the community. This cycle of life and death with associated costs and benefits of trees is illustrated below. Timely and effective urban forest asset management will create conditions for trees to live long, healthy lives that maximize the return on investment and prolong the time until asset removal and replacement. The City of Vaughan’s Asset Management Plan categorizes urban forest assets and provides financial and technical guidance for their effective management. The Plan consists of four components: 1. State of the urban forest that details tree asset quantities and replacement values 2. Levels of services with qualitative and technical performance indicators 3. Lifecycle management strategy describing the operational and capital activities to maintain and manage urban forestry assets to ensure they are in a condition to provide the level of services identified 4. Financial strategy that forecasts operational and capital expenditures to fund the identified lifecycle activities The integration of urban forestry assets provides evidence-based decision-making, promoting responsible and sustainable tree asset lifecycle management while ensuring financial sustainability. To transition to a 7-year proactive tree maintenance program in Vaughan will require an annual operating investment of $1,162,000 (phased in over 4 years), and a one-time capital investment of $35,000. Magnitude of costs and benefits over the tree life cycle 72 Urban Forest Management Strategy This goal acknowledges the importance of collaboration in urban forest management. It recognizes that nearly half of Maple Ridge’s canopy cover is on private land, making engagement with community members, First Nations, landowners, and local organizations crucial for the Urban Forest Management Strategy’s success. The aim is to build lasting, healthy relationships with these stakeholders, leveraging their collective knowledge, resources, and commitment for a more comprehensive approach. Our strengths Community partnerships: Maple Ridge has a track record of successful collaborations with external partners and enjoys strong community interest in protecting and enhancing the urban forest. The existing culture of collaboration within municipal departments and with groups outside the government demonstrates the city’s readiness to foster effective partnerships for urban forest management. Public interest and support: The community shows a high level of interest and support for urban forest initiatives. This existing public engagement provides a solid base for enhancing stewardship and expanding partnership opportunities to include a wider range of stakeholders. Existing partnerships: The City’s proximity to the Malcolm Knapp research forest, along with longstanding collaborations with other research and education institutes, provides a valuable opportunity to participate in research that will support adaptive management of the urban forest. Our Challenges Engagement gaps: Despite the high level of public interest, there might be gaps in effectively engaging all stakeholders, particularly private landowners who control a significant portion of the urban canopy. Developing comprehensive communication and stewardship plans is necessary to bridge these gaps and ensure widespread community involvement. Resource allocation for partnerships: Building and maintaining partnerships require dedicated resources and strategic planning. The city needs to assess and provide the necessary resources to support these collaborations effectively. Lack of public education materials: Homeowners, developers, and other property owners may lack clear guidelines and educational resources about their roles in tree care and urban forest management, leading to missed opportunities for stewardship. Collaboration and coordination with other land managers: A significant portion of trees are situated on land beyond the direct control of the city. The involvement of diverse stakeholders adds complexity to urban forest management landscape. Enhancing coordination with entities like utility companies, neighbouring municipalities, and educational institutions is crucial for harmonizing urban forest management efforts. Currently, some connections exist but they could be strengthened and expanded to better support implementation. GOAL 4: Engage and Partner on the Urban Forest Management Urban Forest Management Strategy73 Strategies to achieve our goal Strategy 9. Engage the community to enhance stewardship of the urban forest Strategy 10. Foster partnership with external groups to implement the Strategy Planting trees on private land: Kelowna’s NeighbourWoods Program Kelowna has adopted five canopy cover targets for different parts of the city in its Official Community Plan. Recognizing that many of the available planting sites are located on private property, the City developed a partnership tree program – NeighbourWoods – in 2010 following the adoption of its Sustainable Urban Forest Strategy. The program is simple: the City coordinates with local nurseries to determine an annual tree list that is available for residents to order. The City takes orders from residents and uses its buying power to secure the trees at a lower cost than would be available to individual homeowners. At least six different species have been available in recent years at a cost of less than $50 per tree for a 6- to 12-foot-tall sapling. Homeowners are responsible for retrieving the tree from the City and installing it on their property. The City’s Urban Forestry team provides printed and online extension resources to explain tree planting and other common questions. 6,500 trees have been planted on private land by the program since 2010. 74 Urban Forest Management Strategy 8 The Action Plan 75 Urban Forest Management Strategy The Action Plan The action plan detailed in the Urban Forest Management Strategy is designed to support Maple Ridge in achieving the established urban forest vision and target. Delving into specific actions, departments involved, implementation timelines, and budget requirements, the plan serves as a comprehensive roadmap for urban forest management over the next 15 years. Goal 1: Protect and expand the urban forest Timeframe Cost Lead Department Strategy 1. Update bylaws, policies and guidelines to protect and expand the urban forest 1.1.1 Review and update the tree protection and management bylaw to ensure adequate planting and protection measures are in place Short $$Parks, Planning 1.1.2 Introduce tree density and/or tree canopy cover minimums into planning tools such as the Zoning Bylaw or Development Permit Area Short $Parks, Planning 1.1.3 Consider allowing delegated minor variances to retain more trees of high retention value Short $Planning 1.1.4 Develop public realm design standards, including soil volume minimums and acceptable planting site technologies, to guide major development proposals and area planning processes to support tree health Short $$Env Planning, Parks. Engineering, Planning 1.1.5 Explore feasible policy options to enable incentives for properties that meet or exceed canopy target or tree density requirements, including CAC waivers, amenity contributions, density bonuses, stormwater utility tax credits Medium $$Env Planning, Finance 1.1.6 Update workflows for application reviews, inspection and enforcement processes for tree considerations with development applications, ensuring that Parks staff provide input into tree retention, protection and planting from pre-application to detailed design phases Short $Env Planning, Parks 1.1.7 Develop a new City Tree Policy that consolidates tree retention/ removal decisions, protection and replacement planting requirements and procedures to be followed during capital works involving new and existing trees Short $$Parks, Engineering LEGEND Timeframe Short: 1-5 years Medium: 6-10 years Long: 10-15 years Cost $: Staff time or otherwise <$10,000 $$: $10,000 - $50,000 $$$: $50,000 - $150,000 $$$$: >$150,000 76 Urban Forest Management Strategy Goal 1: Protect and expand the urban forest Timeframe Cost Lead Department 1.1.8 Update the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw, Design Criteria Manual, and Standard Specifications to detail irrigation standards, planting timing, minimum boulevard widths, minimum soil volumes, acceptable alternatives for soil under hardscape boulevards Short $$Planning, Parks, Engineering Strategy 2. Protect and restore forest lands to support biodiversity and healthy ecosystem functioning 1.2.1 Develop a biodiversity strategy to identify current biodiversity and habitat resources, set conservation targets, and recommend policies and procedures to guide future land acquisition and restoration processes Short $$$Env Planning, Parks 1.2.2 Develop a forest management plan for city-owned forested lands to prioritize and guide restoration and risk management Medium $$$Parks Strategy 3. Plant trees to expand the urban forest to improve climate resilience and equity 1.3.1 Develop a planting plan and tree planting locations for new street trees, new park trees and replacement trees Short $$Parks, Engineering 1.3.2 Develop a capital program to upgrade streetscapes to current standards, including boulevards and street trees, prioritizing low- equity blocks. Explore funding options for the program, such as a frontage improvement fee or parcel tax. Mid $$Parks, Engineering, Finance 1.3.3 Prioritize species diversity in urban street and park tree plantings so that no single species or genus is over-represented (excludes native trees) Short $$Parks, Planning 1.3.4 Review and update the current planting list for public and private trees with consideration of Metro Vancouver’s Urban Tree list for a Changing Climate Short $$Parks, Engineering, Planning 1.3.5 Work with the nursery industry to source tree species that are expected to be resilient to future climate Medium - Long $$Parks, Engineering 1.3.6 Trial new technologies to improve tree health and resilience Short - Medium $$Parks Goal 2: Implement and adapt the Urban Forest Management Strategy Timeframe Cost Lead Department Strategy 4. Integrate urban forest management planning into City and regional strategic initiatives 2.4.1 Incorporate the tree canopy target as a policy objective within the OCP (including new and existing area plans under 2.4.2). Short $Parks, Community Planning 77 Urban Forest Management Strategy Goal 2: Implement and adapt the Urban Forest Management Strategy Timeframe Cost Lead Department 2.4.2 Establish canopy targets by neighbourhood or area plans and integrate the targets and relevant policies and tools in neighbourhood plans Medium $$Parks, Corporate Planning & Consultation 2.4.3 Establish canopy targets by park class as plans related to park assets are updated Long $Parks 2.4.4 Align the Urban Forest Management Strategy (UFMS) with the existing city strategies and policies, and explore opportunities to align upcoming strategies with the UFMS for synergies in planning and implementation where possible Medium $Parks, Corporate Planning & Consultation 2.4.5 Align urban forestry practices and synergize with regional initiatives, e.g., Metro Vancouver’s canopy target for urban containment boundary and regional ecosystem connectivity initiative Short $Parks 2.4.6 Continue to explore options to apply regulatory approaches or new tools as they become available, such as stormwater utilities, climate action development permit areas, and carbon offsets, that could be used to provide incentives to plant trees to achieve stormwater and climate action benefits Medium - Long $Parks, Planning, Engineering Strategy 5. Achieve funding and staffing levels sufficient to implement the Urban Forest Management Strategy 2.5.1 Review current life-cycle costing for management of intensively managed trees and adjust operational budgets accordingly Short $$Parks, Finance 2.5.2 Establish a dedicated annual budget for planting new trees along streets, in parks and naturalized areas Short $$$Parks, Finance 2.5.3 Examine staffing levels and consider hiring new role(s) within Parks, Planning and/or Engineering to address gaps in capacity to implement the Urban Forest Management Strategy Short $$$$Parks, Planning, Engineering, HR 2.5.4 Review tree and landscape securities, and compensation taken for City trees to ensure the amounts are sufficient to replace trees and maintain them for three years. Review every three years Short $Parks, Planning, Engineering 2.5.5 Review application fees to achieve cost recovery in tree permitting, landscape plan review, and inspections Short $Parks, Planning, Engineering 2.5.6 Review the use and purpose of City Tree Fund at least once every five years, and adjust the cash-in-lieu and rules of using the Fund when necessary Medium $Parks, Planning, Finance 2.5.7 Establish a dedicated budget for undergrowth clearing and fuel management in areas of high wildfire risk Short $$$Parks, Fire & Rescue 78 Urban Forest Management Strategy Goal 2: Implement and adapt the Urban Forest Management Strategy Timeframe Cost Lead Department 2.5.8 Access external funding opportunities to support tree planting and maintenance, such as the 2 Billion Tree Program and the recently launched Growing Canada’s Community Canopies (GCCC) initiative Short $$Parks, Finance 2.5.9 Access external employment funding, such as Canada Summer Jobs wage subsidies, and explore establishing sustainable funding for student and internship positions that can contribute to a wide range of stewardship, tree inventory, and other projects Medium $$Parks, Finance Strategy 6. Track and report progress and changes to inform adaptive management 2.6.1 Reassess canopy cover every 5years using LiDAR or other accurate methods as technology advances, and consider updating the State of the Urban Forest Interim Report every 5 years Medium $$Parks 2.6.2 Report on performance annually with consideration for employing selected metrics, such as tree planting, tree mortality and replacement rates, species diversity and ecosystem service values Medium $$Parks 2.6.3 Reassess the public’s perceptions and levels of satisfaction toward tree management services by the City every 10 years Medium $Parks 2.6.4 Review and update the action plan every 5 years and the UFMS every 10 years Medium $$Parks Goal 3: Manage and sustain the urban forest Timeframe Cost Lead Department Strategy 7. Align levels of service for urban forest management with best practices 3.7.1 Complete the inventory of street and park trees within the urban area boundary Short $Parks 3.7.2 Consider establishing an inventory of trees in non-urban ROW and natural areas, capture attributes such as tree/stand height, age, condition, composition Medium $$Parks 3.7.3 Target a 5- to 7-year pruning cycle for street trees and a 10- to 12- year cycle for inventoried park trees Medium $Parks 3.7.4 Ensure all newly planted trees are watered for the first 3-5 years after planting Short $$Parks 3.7.5 Integrate urban forest assets into the City’s asset management system Medium $$Parks, Finance 3.7.6 Review wood debris management practices and identify opportunities to improve utilization of wood wastes for its highest and best use Medium $Parks 79 Urban Forest Management Strategy Goal 3: Manage and sustain the urban forest Timeframe Cost Lead Department 3.7.7 Develop a decision framework for determining responses to infrastructure conflicts, and a range of acceptable mitigation solutions Short $$Parks, Engineering; Operations Strategy 8. Manage trees for health and public safety 3.8.1 Establish a risk management policy for the urban forest to proactively manage greenbelt, edge areas from development, trails, and other City-owned forested areas Short $$$Parks, Fire & Rescue 3.8.2 Establish an extreme weather response plan to streamline the workflow and clarify responsibilities Short $Parks 3.8.3 Consider developing an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plan and liaise with CFIA to identify emerging forest pests of concern. Incorporate best management practices based on the ISA’s Best Management Practices Series – Integrated Pest Management. Short $$Parks 3.8.4 Align planting and risk management practices with the Community Wildfire Protection Plan and FireSmart guides to minimize wildfire risks Medium $$Fire & Rescue, Parks, Planning Goal 4: Engage and partner on urban forest management Timeframe Cost Lead Department Strategy 9. Engage the community to enhance stewardship of the urban forest 4.9.1 Develop a communications and stewardship plan that identifies key partners and associated resourcing requirements, explores opportunities to share key messages, and provides direction on how to engage community members in stewardship Short $Communi- cations, Parks 4.9.2 Provide information on the urban forest benefits and share updates on the Strategy implementation via city websites, social media, and other engagement channels Short $Communi- cations, Parks 4.9.3 Investigate community’s interest and launch outreach programs to encourage public tree planting and care Medium $$Parks, Communi- cations, Finance 4.9.4 Develop clear guidelines and educational resources for developers, homeowners and other property owners about tree care and tree permit requirements Medium $Parks, Communi- cations Strategy 10. Foster partnerships with external groups to implement the Strategy 4.10.1 Collaborate with stratas near significant trees on tree care and protection of the existing mature trees Short $Parks Urban Forest Management Strategy80 Goal 4: Engage and partner on urban forest management Timeframe Cost Lead Department 4.10.2 Explore opportunities to partner with neighbouring municipalities and/or municipalities with similar development patterns for data acquisition, monitoring and responses Medium $Parks 4.10.3 Explore opportunities to partner with the School District for tree planting in school yards Medium $$Parks 4.10.4 Explore opportunities to partner with local First Nations to develop culturally appropriate forest stewardship practices and forest management practices in forested areas Short $Parks 4.10.5 Improve communication and coordination with utility companies and CP Rail to ensure the application of appropriate practices in managing and protecting public trees Short $Parks, Engineering 4.10.6 Continue working with local environmental groups (e.g. ARMS, KEEPS) on restoration and carbon credit initiatives Short $Parks, Communi- cations 4.10.7 Explore opportunities to collaborate with Golden Ears Provincial Park, Kanaka Creek Regional Park and UBC’s Malcolm Knapp Research Forest, BCIT Woodlot on forest management, trail connections Short $Parks 4.10.8 Continue exploring partnership opportunities with post-secondary institutions to offer opportunities for applied student internships or research projects to support stewardship and monitoring Medium $$Parks, HR 81 Urban Forest Management Strategy Monitoring Plan The following table provides performance indicators to guide implementation and help measure progress on the Strategies and Actions. The Action Plan should be reviewed and updated at least every 5 years to ensure these indicators remain relevant and reflective of the evolving needs and priorities of urban forest management in Maple Ridge. Key Performance Indicator Measurement Frequency Method Canopy cover in urban and rural areas (Target: 40% within urban areas by 2050) 5 years LiDAR tree canopy capture and GIS summary Canopy cover city-wide, by neighbourhood, and by area plan 5 years LiDAR tree canopy capture and GIS summary Number of trees planted and removed on public land, and percentage of removed trees that have been replaced Annual Tree inventory, work history Number of trees planted and removed on private land, and percentage of removed trees that have been replaced Annual Tree sale records, tree permits Mortality rates for street trees, park trees, and trees in natural areas Annual Tree inventory, work history Number of trees planted in low-equity areas Annual Tree inventory, tree sale records, tree permits Hectares of public forest areas restored Annual Work history Percentage of species, genera, and families of planted trees in urban areas 5 years Tree inventory records Percentage of trees in different age classes 5 years Tree inventory records Pruning cycle for trees in highest-use areas Annual Work history Percent of satisfaction with the City’s urban forest services 5 years, likely with Strategy update Re-survey Valuation of the benefits (or ecosystem services) of the urban forest 5 years Tree inventory records, tree canopy data 82 Urban Forest Management Strategy 9 References 1 Dobbs C, Martinez-Harms MJ, Kendal D. Ecosystem services. In: Routledge handbook of urban forestry. Routledge; 2017. p. 51–64. 2 Roeland S, Moretti M, Amorim JH, Branquinho C, Fares S, Morelli F, et al. Towards an integrative approach to evaluate the environmental ecosystem services provided by urban forest. J For Res. 2019;30(6):1981–96. 3 The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Kumar P, editor. Routledge; 2012. 455 p. 4 Center for Urban Forest Research (Davis, CA), Southern Center for Urban Forestry Research & Information (Athens, GA). The Large Tree Argument [Internet]. USDA Forest Service; [cited 2024 Jan 12]. Available from: https://urbanforestrysouth.org/ resources/library/citations/the-large-tree-argument-1-up 5 Kaplan R. The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning. 1993;26(1–4):193–201. 6 Wolf KL, Flora K. Mental Health & Function. Green Cities Good Health. 2010; 7 Lee J, Park BJ, Tsunetsugu Y, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. Restorative effects of viewing real forest landscapes, based on a comparison with urban landscapes. Scand J For Res. 2009;24(3):227–34. 8 Frumkin H. Healthy places: exploring the evidence. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(9):1451–6. 9 Wolf KL. Business district streetscapes, trees, and consumer response. J For. 2005;103(8):396–400. 10 Payton S, Lindsey G, Wilson J, Ottensmann JR, Man J. Valuing the benefits of the urban forest: a spatial hedonic approach. J Environ Plan Manag. 2008;51(6):717–36. 11 Tyrväinen L. The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landsc Urban Plan. 1997;37(3–4):211–22. 12 Escobedo FJ, Adams DC, Timilsina N. Urban forest structure effects on property value. Ecosyst Serv. 2015;12:209–17. 13 Nesbitt L, Hotte N, Barron S, Cowan J, Sheppard SRJ. The social and economic value of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban forests in North America: A review and suggestions for future research. Urban For Urban Green. 2017 Jul;25:103–11. 14 Seitz J, Escobedo F. Urban Forests in Florida: Trees Control Stormwater Runoff and Improve Water Quality: FOR184/FR239, 5/2008. EDIS. 2008;2008(5). 15 Berland A, Shiflett SA, Shuster WD, Garmestani AS, Goddard HC, Herrmann DL, et al. The role of trees in urban stormwater management. Landsc Urban Plan. 2017;162:167–77. 16 Brack CL. Pollution mitigation and carbon sequestration by an urban forest. Environ Pollut. 2002;116:S195–200. 17 Zupancic T, Westmacott C, Bulthuis M. The impact of green space on heat and air pollution in urban communities: A meta- narrative systematic review. 2017;68. 18 Nowak DJ, Greenfield EJ, Hoehn RE, Lapoint E. Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environ Pollut. 2013 Jul;178:229–36. 19 Livesley SJ, McPherson EG, Calfapietra C. The Urban Forest and Ecosystem Services: Impacts on Urban Water, Heat, and Pollution Cycles at the Tree, Street, and City Scale. J Environ Qual. 2016 Jan;45(1):119–24. 20 MacGregor-Fors I, Escobar F, Rueda-Hernández R, Avendaño-Reyes S, Baena ML, Bandala VM, et al. City “green” contributions: the role of urban greenspaces as reservoirs for biodiversity. Forests. 2016;7(7):146. 21 Livesley SJ, Escobedo FJ, Morgenroth J. The biodiversity of urban and peri-urban forests and the diverse ecosystem services they provide as socio-ecological systems. Forests. 2016;7(12):291. 22 Metro Vancouver. Climate Projections For Metro Vancouver [Internet]. Burnaby, BC: Metro Vancouver; 2016 p. 73. Available from: http://www.metrovancouver.org/services/air-quality/AirQualityPublications/ClimateProjectionsForMetroVancouver.pdf 23 Heaviside C, Macintyre H, Vardoulakis S. The Urban Heat Island: Implications for Health in a Changing Environment. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Sep 1;4(3):296–305. 24 Diamond Head Consulting Ltd. Urban Forest Climate Adaptation Framework for Metro Vancouver [Internet]. Vancouver, BC: Metro Vancouver; 2017 p. 115. Available from: http://www.metrovancouver.org/services/regional-planning/ PlanningPublications/UrbanForestClimateAdaptationFrameworkTreeSpeciesSelection.pdf 25 Bohl CC, Plater-Zyberk E. Building Community across the Rural-to-Urban Transect [The Transect]. Places [Internet]. 2006 Aug 1 [cited 2024 Jan 19];18(1). Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1zt6g0sr 26 BC Forest Service. Biogeoclimatic Zones of British Columbia - Coastal Western Hemlock [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 12]. Available from: https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/library/documents/treebook/biogeo/cwhzone1.htm 27 The University of British Columbia. Malcolm Knapp Research Forest. [cited 2024 Jan 12]. History. Available from: https://www. mkrf.forestry.ubc.ca/about/history/ 28 Maple Ridge Museum. On Display: Timberland [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 12]. Available from: https://mapleridgemuseum.org/ on-display-timberland/ 29 American Forests. Tree Equity Score [Internet]. American Forests. [cited 2023 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www. americanforests.org/tools-research-reports-and-guides/tree-equity-score/ 30 Diamond Head Consulting. Metro Vancouver Tree Regulations Toolkit [Internet]. Metro Vancouver; 2021 May p. 125. Available from: https://metrovancouver.org/services/regional-planning/Documents/metro-vancouver-tree-regulations-toolkit-with- appendices-2021-05.pdf 83 Urban Forest Management Strategy 10 Appendices 84 Urban Forest Management Strategy Appendix 1: Overview of Bylaws and Other Policy Tools Guiding Urban Forest Management in Maple Ridge Maple Ridge’s urban forest is regulated through a series of bylaws, guidelines, and policies. The Tree Protection and Management Bylaw is one of the primary policy tools that the City uses to regulate tree removal and replacement on both private and City-owned land. On private land, the urban forest is regulated through a combination of Zoning Bylaw, Watercourse Protection Bylaw, Development Permit Area (DPA) Guidelines, and the Municipal Enhancement & Landscaping Standards (required for the Environmental Development Permit applications). The Zoning Bylaw defines the minimal landscaped areas and permeable surface, varying by the zoning for different uses. The DPA Guidelines establishes additional requirements on tree and vegetation retention, landscaping, overall character and form in areas designated as DPAs by the OCP. For example, the Watercourse Protection Bylaw imposes additional tree removal restrictions in watercourse protection DPAs. Trees on City-owned land, such as streets and parks, are subject to Subdivision Bylaw, Street Tree Specifications, and Design Criteria Manual. The Subdivision Bylaw specifies requirements on street tree planting as part of the subdivision application. The Street Tree Specifications provide detailed planting requirements and guidance, such as soil volume and quality, tree size, species selection, and spacing, for street tree planting for subdivision projects. The Design Criteria Manual applies to street tree planting required for municipal projects. Development Permit Areas (DPAs) in Maple Ridge, established through the OCP, play a crucial role in shaping land use, development, and environmental protection. These areas often are subject to stricter tree retention and landscaping requirements for environmental health and livability. For example, the Natural Features DPAs are established for the “preservation, protection, restoration, and enhancement of the natural environment for lands designated by the OCP or lands within 50 meters of the top-of-bank of a watercourse or wetland identified as a natural feature of the OCP.” Additionally, the City requires an Environmental Development Permit (EDP) for any clearing, building, or development-related activity in areas within 50 meters of a watercourse or wetland area or conservation areas, with greater than 15% of slope, or within a floodplain to further regulate development activities and limit impacts on existing trees and vegetation. Appendix 2: Engagement Summaries Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary i City of Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy Phase 1 Engagement Summary Contents 1.0 SCOPE OF THE ENGAGEMENT ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives for public engagement ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Engagement activities .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Communication tactics used ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.0 WHO WE HEARD FROM ............................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Survey demographics ................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 WHAT WE HEARD ..................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Understanding how the urban forest is valued and the vision for the next 20 years .................................. 4 3.2 Important urban forest places ..................................................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 Places of Value .................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2 Places needing Improvements ............................................................................................................ 8 3.3 The urban forest on your street ................................................................................................................... 8 3.4 Priorities for urban forest management and tree regulations ................................................................... 10 3.5 Urban forest service levels ......................................................................................................................... 12 3.6 Community stewardship ............................................................................................................................ 13 4.0 SYNTHESIS OF FEEDBACK ........................................................................................................ 17 5.0 NEXT STEPS ............................................................................................................................. 20 APPENDIX 1 SAMPLE COMMUNICATION AND PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS .................................. 20 Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 1 Scope of the Engagement Maple Ridge is developing an Urban Forest Management Strategy (the Strategy) to manage and grow the urban forest over the next 20 years. Maple Ridge strives to have a thriving, climate-adapted urban forest that is essential to community well-being, provides high-value recreational opportunities, supports ecological health and biodiversity, offers cost-effective climate solutions, and improves livability for all residents. Two phases of public engagement are planned to inform the Strategy. The first phase occurred in September – October 2023, aimed to collect the community’s input on a long-term strategic urban forestry vision and supporting goals for urban forest protection and management. The second phase will take place after the Strategy is drafted, focusing on gathering opinions about the draft strategy. Objectives for public engagement Objectives for the first phase of public engagement are: • To inform the public about o The status of our urban forest o The role of our urban forest in the community, including the unique environmental, economic, and social value of Maple Ridge’s urban forest o The opportunities and challenges for the urban forest management, particularly due to ongoing development and climate change • To consult the community to: o Identify and acknowledge their concerns and aspirations for the City’s urban forest o Develop a long-term vision and goals for the strategy that capture the community’s perspective on the City’s urban forest Engagement activities The public was invited to provide input through a 15-min online survey, a mapping tool hosted on the project page, and 3 in-person open houses. The project team presented to the Parks, Recreation and Culture Committee in September 2023 and sought input from committee members. Details on engagement opportunities for Phase 1 in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of engagement opportunities in Phase 1 Engagement Date Engagement Activity Participants September 23, 2023 Booth at Memorial Peace Park during Haney Farmers’ Market ~150 September 27, 2023 Booth at Maple Ridge Park during National Tree Planting Day ~60 September 27, 2023 Presentation with the Parks, Recreation, and Culture Committee 12 October 5, 2023 Booth at Albion Community Centre ~15 Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 2 Communication tactics used Information on engagement opportunities was communicated via several online platforms to reach as many people as possible. Promotional materials used are in the appendix. The platforms used included: • Project page on Engage Maple Ridge • Maple Ridge’s social media accounts: Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn • Postcard handouts, Who we heard from We have engaged more than 2,000 people in the first phase, which includes 255 survey respondents, 12 members from the Parks, Recreation, and Culture committee, 225 people who attended the in-person open houses, over 15 people through the in-person and online mapping tools (85 submissions), and more than 1,500 people from project page’s engagement analytics. Survey demographics Of the 255 survey respondents: • 97% reside in Maple Ridge • 84% are homeowners, 15% are renters • Most respondents live in Central (17%) and West (17%) Maple Ridge (Figure 1) • 69% are 35-64 years old (Figure 2) • 60% of respondents have lived in the City for 10 or more years (Figure 3) Figure 1. Where survey respondents reside (total respondents = 255) 6% 3% 0% 17% 4% 8% 2% 2% 7% 2% 5% 5% 7% 17% 1% 11% 0%2%4%6%8%10%12%14%16%18%20% Yennadon Whonnock Whispering Falls West Maple Ridge Webster's Corners Town Centre Thornhill South Alouette Silver Valley Ruskin Hammond East Maple Ridge Cottonwood Central Maple Ridge Alouette Albion Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 3 Figure 2. Age distribution of survey respondents (total respondents = 255) Figure 3. Duration of respondents' residence in the City (total respondents = 254) What We Heard Results from the first phase of public engagement are summarised in this section and structured around the following topics: • Understanding how the Urban Forest is valued and developing a vision for the next 20 years • Important urban forest places • Preferences for street trees (size and distribution) • Priorities for urban forest management and tree regulation • Satisfaction with and preferred urban forest levels of service • Community stewardship of the urban forest 12% 6% 16% 14% 16% 23% 13% 2% 0%5%10%15%20%25% Prefer not to answer 75+ 65-74 55-64 45-54 35-44 25-34 20-24 2% 40% 20% 19% 16% 2% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45% Not applicable (I don't live in Maple Ridge) Over 20 years 10 to under 20 years 5 to under 10 years 1 to under 5 years Less than a year Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 4 Understanding how the urban forest is valued and the vision for the next 20 years Survey respondents were asked to rank the benefits they valued in the urban forest (Figure 4). The most important urban forest benefits were climate change resilience (shade and cooling of streets and buildings, flood protection, and role in carbon cycle storage), environmental benefits (such as rainwater management, air purification, and wind protection), and ecological benefits (habitat and food for native plants and animals). Ranking lower in importance are economic, cultural interest, and health and social benefits. Figure 4. Respondents’ ranking of urban forest benefits (total respondents = 255) Members of the Parks, Recreation, and Culture Committee (the Committee for short hereafter) were invited to share their impression of Maple Ridge’s urban forest (Figure 5). They used words such as “sustainable”, “abundant”, “beautiful”, “clean”, “diverse” and, “enriching” to describe the current values they appreciate about the urban forest. 5.16 4.8 3.78 2.76 2.51 1.99 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Economic, e.g., increased property values, tourism, food production Cultural interest, e.g., old, unique, or culturally important trees, beautification, spiritual significance/meaning Health and social, e.g., improved mental health; places to meet people, recreate, and exercise Ecological, e.g., habitat and food for native (local) plants and animals Environmental services, e.g., rainwater management, air purification, wind protection Climate change resilience, e.g., shade and cooling of streets and buildings, flood protection, role in carbon cycle and storage Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 5 Figure 5. Description of Maple Ridge's urban forest from 6 Committee members. Survey participants were asked to share their vision for Maple Ridge’s urban forest in 20 years (Figure 6). The overwhelming consensus was a desire for more trees in the City, (251 respondents). Respondents stated that they would like to see a healthy (20 respondents) urban forest with an increased tree canopy (149 respondents). Respondents emphasized the importance of having mixed and native tree species (59 respondents) as they wish Maple Ridge’s urban forest to be climate resilient (40 respondents) and can provide for wildlife habitat and biodiversity (29 respondents). Respondents also valued the accessibility of recreational green spaces (17 respondents) and the aesthetics (19 respondents) of a healthy forest. Some 39 respondents expressed a strong desire to have the urban forest integrated with urban planning, citing examples of how current developments treat trees as a decorative addition instead of being carefully planned to maximize their health and benefits. Additionally, respondents want to see the City to preserve larger or mature trees (21 respondents) and prevent tree removals (10 respondents). Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 6 Figure 6. Word cloud showing the most common words used by respondents to describe their vision of the urban forest for the next 20 years (total respondents = 255) Canopy cover preferences When asked about their preference for canopy cover change over the next 20 years (Figure 7), 91% of respondents desired an increase in tree canopy cover. However, a small proportion (7%) of respondents were happy with the current canopy level, and 2% preferred a decreased canopy cover. Figure 7. Respondents' preferences for canopy cover change in Maple Ridge over the next 20 years (total respondents = 255) 2% 7% 91% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Decrease canopy cover Maintain canopy cover at the current level Increase canopy cover Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 7 Important urban forest places Community members used the mapping tool, either through the online platform or at the in-person events, to identify significant urban forest places that they valued or believed need improvement. A total of 85 locations were identified, with 44 (52%) places of value and 41 (48%) places needing improvements. Places of value Places of value were fairly spread out across the City but were mostly concentrated within the Haney region (13 submissions), Golden Ears Provincial Park (8 submissions), and Thornhill region leading towards Kanaka Creek (7 submissions). Submissions were in parks, along trails, or in unprotected greenspaces or natural areas (Figure 8). The most common reasons that respondents valued these locations included strong ties to a familiar recreational site or otherwise large trees (18 submissions). People also shared their appreciation for the greenness along trails and roads during their commute (5 submissions), being able to see or support wildlife habitat (3 submissions) as well as general beauty and aesthetic value (2 submissions). Figure 8. Places of Value identified in the urban forest through the online mapping tool and through the in- person open houses (submissions = 44) “We’re lucky to have this great natural area so accessible off of DTR” - Respondent on valuing a point within the BCIT Woodlot Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 8 Places needing improvements Urban forest locations needing improvement are summarised in Figure 9. Out of the 41 submissions, most places were concentrated around the Haney area (17 submissions) and the Town Centre (9 submissions). These places were mostly lacking trees (10 submissions), specifically within in parking lots (4 submissions) and underutilized open spaces (4 submissions). Other places of concern include areas with future tree growth issues (4 mentions) where wrong trees were planted wrong place or trees having concerning growth structures. Figure 9. Identified urban forest places needing improvements through the online mapping tool and through the in-person open houses (submissions = 41) The urban forest on your street Survey respondents were asked to identify photos that most resembled their street and their preference for how they would like their street to appear (Figure 10). Most respondents (85%) currently live on streets without large trees resembling Option A – few or no trees (22%), Option B – regularly spaced, small-sized trees (18%), Option C - regularly spaced, medium-sized trees (22%), and Option D – mixed spacing and species, medium-sized trees (23%). The remaining respondents live on streets resembling Option F – mixed spacing and species, large trees (12%) and Option E – regularly spaced, large-sized trees (3%). Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 9 When asked which street respondents would prefer to live on, 54% indicated a preference for streets with large trees (options E or F). Only 3% of respondents would like to live on a street with small trees (Option B) and 1% would like to live on a street with few or no trees (Option A). A. Few or no trees B. Regularly spaced small trees C. Regularly spaced, medium-sized trees D. Mixed spacing and species (different types of trees), medium sized trees E. Regularly spaced, large trees F. Mixed spacing and species (different types of trees) large trees Figure 10. Types of street planting presented to survey respondents (total responses = 255) Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 10 Respondents were asked if they were satisfied with the number of trees in their immediate neighbourhood (Figure 11). The large majority (71%) would like to see more trees. A small portion (20%) wanted to maintain the current number of trees, and an even smaller portion (5%) wanted to see fewer trees. Figure 11. Respondents' preference of number of tree canopy Respondents who selected the “other” option also wanted more trees in their neighbourhoods. Specifically, they were content with the number of trees on private property but wished to see an increase in trees on City-owned land within their neighbourhoods. Priorities for urban forest management and tree regulations Survey respondents were asked to rank areas for tree planting (Figure 12). The top ranked location is along local residential streets (average ranking score at 2.67). The subsequent locations with similar rankings are along trails and greenways (3.39), in City parks (3.43), on private land (3.46), and along major arterial roads (3.51). Participants believed that planting in forested conservation areas could be in the lowest priority, compared to the other locations (4.55). Figure 12. Areas where trees are missing (total respondents = 255) 3% 0% 5% 71% 20% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% Other (please specify) No opinion I would like fewer trees and a smaller tree canopy I would like to have more trees/tree canopy I would like to keep the same number of trees/same level of tree canopy 4.55 3.51 3.46 3.43 3.39 2.67 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 In forested conservation areas Along major arterial roads (e.g., Dewdney Trunk Road, and Lougheed Hwy) On private land (e.g. residential homes, land owned by corporate or institutional landowners) In city parks Along trails and greenways Along local residential streets Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 11 Priority actions on for tree regulations Survey respondents showed mixed levels of support for tree regulations on private property (Figure 13). Of the eight regulations, respondents were the most supportive of significant tree canopy protection (91% support, 4% oppose), healthy tree retention (87% support, 7% oppose), tree protection from damages (91% support, 3% oppose), and retention of very large trees (80% support, 9% oppose). Low levels of support was shown towards regulations that allow tree removals more easily, such as allowing tree removals so long as they keep some on their property (19% support, 63% oppose), allowing the removal of large trees with replacement trees (28% support, 62% oppose), and allowing the removal of healthy trees with replacement trees (33% support, 55% oppose). Figure 13. Respondents’ levels of support for eight tree regulations on private property (total respondents = 255) Tree regulations on private property Respondents were asked to share thoughts on the extent to which trees (with diameters 20cm or larger) are protected by the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw (Figure 14). Most respondents (52%) felt that trees were insufficiently protected. Some (20%) thought that trees are adequately protected. Only 10% thought that trees were overly protected. 3% 1% 1% 4% 3% 1% 1% 1% 6% 9% 12% 20% 54% 60% 65% 74% 13% 19% 21% 44% 26% 31% 22% 16% 15% 9% 11% 9% 8% 5% 6% 5% 21% 22% 20% 13% 5% 42% 40% 35% 10% 4% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Allow property owners to remove trees as long as they keep some trees on their property Allow the removal of very large trees but require new trees to be planted as replacements Allow the removal of healthy trees but require new trees to be planted as replacements When it is not possible to plant new trees to replace ones removed, provide a cash value for the City to plant a tree elsewhere Require the retention of very large trees Protect trees from being damaged Require the retention of healthy trees Protect against significant tree canopy loss Unsure/No opinion Strongly support Support Neutral Oppose Strongly oppose Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 12 Figure 14. Respondents' preference for tree protection on private property (total respondents = 255) Urban forest service levels Service levels describe how the City of Maple Ridge maintains City-owned trees. Survey respondents were asked to rank satisfaction levels with current service levels for street trees, trees in parks, and trees in conservation areas. The overall feedback indicates varying degrees of satisfaction with the urban forest service provided by the City (Figure 15). Respondents expressed the highest level of satisfaction with the City’s response to storm and debris cleanup (61% satisfied, 8% dissatisfied). They were moderately satisfied to neutral with the pest and disease control (39% satisfied versus 15% dissatisfied, 40% neutral). Respondents held a neutral stance regarding hazard tree removal (51% neutral) and wildfire and forest fuel management (30% satisfied versus 16% dissatisfied, 44% neutral). However, dissatisfaction was prevalent in other areas of urban forest services. Notably, public education provided by the City received the lowest satisfaction rating (6% satisfied, 48% dissatisfied). Additionally, respondents were dissatisfied with City tree protection and preservation (18% satisfied, 42% dissatisfied) and City tree planting and replacement (24% satisfied, 38% dissatisfied). 2% 16% 10% 52% 20% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60% Other (please specify) Unsure or Don't know Too restrictive –trees are overly protected Insufficient –trees are not sufficiently protected Adequate –tree are well protected Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 13 Figure 15. Satisfaction levels with current service levels for City-owned trees (street trees, trees in parks, and trees in conservation areas) (total respondents = 255) In terms of funding for supporting urban forest service levels (Figure 16), most respondents (73%) would like to see the City to allocate increased funding to improve urban forestry services. A smaller proportion preferred maintaining the current funding level (8%), while a minority advocated for reducing the funding allocation (2%). Figure 16. Respondents’ preferences on funding allocation for urban forest services Community stewardship Community stewardship refers to the involvement of community members in caring for or contributing to the urban forest on City or private lands. Most respondents (92%) had participated in at least one 18% 6% 7% 9% 24% 5% 15% 5% 3% 4% 4% 5% 7% 5% 16% 22% 25% 26% 31% 34% 54% 27% 33% 31% 51% 30% 44% 40% 25% 33% 26% 26% 7% 12% 11% 4% 6% 15% 16% 12% 4% 4% 4% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Public education by the City City tree protection and preservation City tree planting and replacement Hazard tree removal by the City Wildfire prevention and forest fuel management by the City City tree pruning Pest and disease control by the City The City’s storm response and tree debris cleanup I'm not aware of this service Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 16% 2% 8% 73% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% Not sure –need more information Decrease the amount of funding Make no change to the current amount of funding Increase the amount of funding Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 14 urban forest stewardship activity (Figure 17). The top attended stewardship activities were maintaining trees on personal property (71%), planting trees on personal property (55%), and watering street trees (38%). Other activities that respondents have participated in included assisting others with tree needs, removing hazardous or sick tree on personal property, planting trees in volunteer programs, reporting a tree for inspection. Only 8% had not been involved in any urban forest stewardship activities. Figure 17. Stewardship activities that respondents have participated in the past 5 years (total respondents = 255) Barriers to participating in stewardship activities Respondents cited various reasons that restricted their participation in stewardship activities (Figure 18). While 44% of participants reported no barriers, 22% felt they did not have enough information about stewardship opportunities, which was the top voted barrier. Other barriers included not having enough space for a new tree (19%), needing permission from a strata or landlord (17%), having enough trees on private property (15%), having physical or mobility challenges (14%), being too costly (11%), and taking too much time (9%). Only 2% expressed disinterest in stewardship activities related to the urban forest. 3% 8% 13% 18% 28% 28% 38% 55% 71% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% Other (please specify) None of the above Reported a tree to the City for inspection Planted tree(s) in a park as part of a volunteer program Removed a hazardous or sick tree on your property Assisted another person (e.g., friend, neighbour, or family member) with their tree needs Watered a street tree Planted one or more trees on your property Maintained tree(s) on your property (e.g., watered or pruned it, or applied insecticide or tree band) Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 15 Figure 18. Barriers preventing respondents from participating in stewardship activities (total respondents = 255) Public interest for urban forest stewardship activities Respondents generally showed a strong interest in supporting and nurturing the urban forest in Maple Ridge (Figure 19). Most participants expressed willingness to volunteer planting trees on City property (89%) and participating in urban forest stewardship activities (71%). Additionally, 65% of respondents were willing to help with watering trees in the streets (65%) and on private property (50%). Forty-five percent (45%) also committed to plant trees on their property. 6% 2% 2% 2% 3% 4% 9% 11% 14% 15% 17% 19% 22% 44% 0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50% Other (please specify) I’m not interested in stewardship activities related to the urban forest It requires too much physical effort (e.g., trees require too much effort to maintain) I don’t know how to take care of a tree I have safety concerns (e.g., wildfire and branch breakages) I don’t want any more trees (e.g., for the view or shade) It takes too much time It is too costly (e.g., to buy a tree) I have physical or mobility challenges (including concerns for allergies) I already have enough trees on my property I need permission from my strata or landlord I don’t have enough space for a new tree I don’t have enough information about stewardship activities (e.g., how to participate, or what’s available) Nothing Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 16 Figure 19. Respondents’ interest in supporting the urban forest (total respondents = 255) Public education Interests When asked about what people would like to learn about tree maintenance, the most popular subjects included improving their yard to provide habitat for birds and pollinators (48%), pruning trees (40%), and managing tree pests and disease (40%). Additionally, 36% of respondents expressed an interest in learning how to choose the right tree for their yard (36%) and how to keep trees healthy during construction (28%). Only a small portion had no interest in learning about trees (4%). Figure 20. Respondents’ preferred topics for learning about tree maintenance (total respondents = 255) Interest in tree sale/voucher Respondents were asked about their interest in a tree sale or tree voucher program where they could buy a tree at a discounted price (Figure 21). A significant 57% expressed strong interest in such a program, while an additional 18% indicated some interests. On the other hand, 13% expressed no interest, and 12% either have no opinion or find the question not applicable to them. 45% 50% 65% 71% 89% 33% 35% 17% 15% 6% 22% 15% 18% 15% 4% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Planting trees on my property Watering trees on my property Watering street trees Participating in urban forest stewardship activities Volunteering to plant trees on City property Yes Somewhat No 6% 4% 28% 31% 36% 40% 40% 48% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60% Other (please specify) Nothing –I am not interested in learning about trees How to keep trees healthy during construction How and when to water trees How to choose the right tree for my yard How to manage tree pests and diseases How and when to prune tree branches How to improve my yard to provide habitat for birds and pollinators Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 17 Figure 21. Respondents’ interests in a tree sale or a tree voucher program among Maple Ridge residents (total respondents = 254) Synthesis of Feedback The feedback collected from the survey, mapping tool, and Committee presentation has been synthesized into key statements in the tables below. Each key statement (“What we heard”) is followed by an explanation of how the feedback will inform the ongoing development of the UFMS for the following urban forest themes: • Implement and adapt • Protect and expand • Manage and sustain • Engage and partner Summary of feedback for the urban forest planning and long-term vision What we Heard How it will be considered • Respondents value their greenspaces. They appreciate the accessibility to their recreational sites. • Survey respondents envisioned Maple Ridge to have healthy and mature trees of diverse, climate-resilient, and native species • Respondents would like to see the harmonious coexistence between the community and wildlife. The project team will incorporate these inputs when drafting the UFMS vision and goals to emphasize the benefits most valued by the community. Key themes for implementing and adapting the urban forest for enhance efficiency and resilience What we Heard How it will be considered Respondents are unsatisfied with the current levels tree protection. The project team will consider strategies aimed at enhancing tree protection and preservation, 12% 13% 18% 57% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60% Not applicable/No opinion No, I am not interested Yes, I am somewhat interested Yes, I am very interested Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 18 Most respondents would like to increase the funding allocated to improve the service levels for the urban forest management The project team will strive to achieve adequate funding and staffing levels to support the implementation of the Strategy Many respondents are advocating for the retention of large and healthy trees, many indicating strong support The draft Strategy will consider including a canopy target for the next 20 years as a policy objective into the OCP and in new and existing local area plans The draft Strategy will also make recommendations about policy updates for improved tree retention outcomes. Key themes for protecting and expanding the urban forest for to maximize benefits and enhance resilience What we Heard How it will be considered The top 3 locations where respondents wanted more trees planted are along local residential streets, trails and greenways, and in parks. The draft Strategy will consider strategies to expand the urban forest in identified locations Respondents were either dissatisfied or neutral about service levels regarding city tree planting and replacement. The draft Strategy will include recommendations to update bylaws and other policies, and new guidelines on retention/removal decisions, and protection requirements and procedure. • More respondents were dissatisfied than satisfied by current levels of tree protection and preservation efforts • Many respondents think that the bylaw does not sufficiently protect tree In line with preserving large mature trees, respondents are against the idea of replacing cut trees with new trees. When replacing tree is not possible, participants are in favour of cash-in-lieu for off-site planting. The draft Strategy will consider recommendations aimed at protecting and restoring forest lands to support healthy ecosystem functions. Key themes for managing and sustaining the urban forest for to maximize benefits and enhance resilience What we Heard How it will be considered Respondents had mixed levels of satisfaction for current urban forest service levels: • Respondents were satisfied with storm and debris cleanup • Respondent expressed dissatisfaction for public education, protection and preservation, and tree planting and replacement • Respondents were mostly neutral about pest and disease control, wildfire and forest fuel management, and hazard tree removal The draft Strategy will share information about services provided by the City and consider recommendations to improve services with the greatest dissatisfaction. In particular, trying to align service levels for urban forest with best practices and prioritizing tree risks for tree health and community safety. Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 19 Key themes for engaging and partnering for inclusive urban forest management What we Heard How it will be considered A small portion of respondents are unaware of the City’s role and responsibilities on public education, yet among those who know of this service are dissatisfied. The draft Strategy will reassess the platforms best used to share information on potential public education opportunities. The large majority of respondents have participated in urban forest stewardship activities in the past five years. However, there are barriers hindering more support for stewardship activities. The top 3 are: • Not having enough information on how to participate • Not having enough space for a new tree • Needing permission from their strata or their landlord to plant trees The draft Strategy will consider ways for the City to encourage urban forest stewardship, including education on tree planting and tree care, and offer incentives. Survey respondents want to help! They are most interested in supporting the urban forest through: • Volunteering to plant trees on City property • Participating in stewardship activities • Watering trees on street and in their property Survey respondents are also enthusiastic about having a tree sale or a tree voucher program aimed at the residents of Maple Ridge. Respondents are also eager to learn. The most interested topics are: • Improving habitat for birds and pollinators in their yard • Pruning tree branches • Managing trees for pest and diseases The draft Strategy will provide recommendations to guide tree planting and maintenance, and also consider providing guidance on other topics of interests Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy – Phase 1 Engagement Summary 20 Next Steps The findings from the first phase of community engagement will inform the development of the draft UFMS, including a long-term vision and priorities for implementation. Phase 2 of public engagement is expected to occur in January of 2024 to gather feedback on the draft Strategy. Appendix 1 Sample Communication and Promotional Materials City of Maple Ridge Urban Forest Management Strategy Phase 2 Engagement Summary • o o o • o o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% • • • • • o o • o o o o • ~ Maple Ridge -City of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Dan Ruimy and Members of Council MEETING DATE: July 16, 2024 FILE NO: 09-4560-20 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: CoW SUBJECT: The Patch Brewery Liquor License Lounge Endorsement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch (LCRB) has received an application from The Patch Brewery Inc. located at 12745 Laity Street for a manufacturer brewery lounge endorsement. The applicant has applied for a brewery lounge endorsement as an amendment to their manufacturer license. The lounge endorsement, if approved would allow onsite alcohol sales and consumption from 9:00 am to 10:00 pm Monday to Sunday. The Patch Brewery Inc. has a seating capacity of 198 and will be retailing pizza, salads, charcuterie boards and other small snacks. They will also be offering coffee, tea, craft sodas, juice and water. One of the considerations used by the LCLB in reviewing an application for an amendment to a liquor primary license is a resolution from the local government. A few regulatory criteria must be addressed in a Council resolution as well as comments pertaining to the views expressed by area residents. Council may choose to support the application, not support the application, or indicate they do not wish to comment. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. That the application for a brewery lounge endorsement, as an amendment to their manufacturer license, by The Patch Brewery Inc. located at 12745 Laity Street, Maple Ridge be supported based on the information contained in the Council report dated July 16, 2024. 2. That a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch in accordance with the legislative requirements. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: On January 24, 2024, the owner of The Patch Brewery Inc. through the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB) applied for a brewery lounge endorsement to their manufacturer brewery license. Doc iD# 333670:) Page 1 of 3 The lounge endorsement, if approved, would allow alcohol consumption from 9:00 am to 10:00 pm Monday to Sunday. The Patch Brewery Inc. has a seating capacity of 198 (66 in the lower lounge area, 32 in the upper lounge area and 100 in the covered patio area). They will also be offering pizza, salads, charcuterie boards and other small snacks, including coffee, tea, craft sodas, juice and water. The LCLB guidelines request a specific Council resolution commenting on the application in terms of community impacts which may occur because of the proposed change to the licensed Brewery license at this location. Part of the process requires Council to gather views of the residents who may be affected by the establishment of the liquor primary license in their neighbourhood. In following the public input requirement, 46 letters were sent to owners and occupants of property within approximately 200 metres of the subject site. There were no responses received to the 46 letters sent to surrounding property owners and occupants. The Ridge Meadows RCMP Detachment was asked for their input on this matter, and have confirmed there are no operational issues with this application. There is adequate parking, on the subject property to satisfy municipal parking requirements for this proposed additional use. The three closest liquor primary licensed premises to the subject property are: • The Reach Neighbourhood Pub & Grill -300-20398 Dewdney Trunk Road (3 km) • The Ranch Pub and Grill -#2 -21973 132 Avenue (2 7 km) • Silver Valley Brewing Co. Ltd. -104 -11952 224 Street (3.3 km) b) Intergovernmental Issues: Both local government and the provincial government have an interest in ensuring that liquor regulations are followed and that licensed establishments listen to the needs of the community. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: The review of this application has taken into consideration the potential for concerns from surrounding properties in terms of parking, traffic, and noise generation as well as the proximity of schools and similar establishments. Doc ID# 3836700 Page 2 of 3 d) Interdepartmental Implications: The Bylaw, Licensing & Community Safety Department has coordinated in the review process and solicited input from the public, other municipal departments as well as the Ridge Meadows RCMP. e) Alternatives: To not approve the application and provide conditions to the approval in the form or recommendations to forward to the LCRB. CONCLUSION: That Council pass the necessary resolution supporting the application from The Patch Brewery Inc. based upon the staff findings set out in this report. Prepared by: Michelle Adams Director, Bylaw, Licensing & Community Safety Concurrence: Scott Hartman Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: Appendix 1: Subject Map Appendix 2: Public Notice Announcement Doc iDtJ 3336700 Page 3 of 3 APPENDIX 1 The Patch Brewery Inc 0 0 r---0 N 13055 13068 0 I{) c.o 0 13046 N 13035 1--13014 V. 12950 ~ 12957 ~ R.,__ _______ ....- f-----------------1 12591 I{) co r---0 N - 1-- --"-I I I ,-.J 1 ·~ . " 1-- ~ , r-r- r-r-u -~ ~ • -' 1--"'~ I=:! ~ i - ~ f-µ\:'C 11 1----'_s .I I 11 polygon Layer i. ·-) Override 1 ·-· I I I I I I L . I graphicslayer0 K- \ J(_ " Street Centrelines PropertyParcels D Parcel I{) co ~ en co 0 en N 0 N Municipal Boundary -· Railway (Generalized) Municipal Boundary ' r---C") N 0 r---r---N ~ ~ co N N I I I 21f 8 . . 12710 I 12700 : en "'" C") N L I{) ~ I{) ~ N "'" c.oN 0 C")~ v I{)~ ~ N ;:jN ·----------~---~ 12640 , D 0 280 560 1, 120 ft 1--1 --+-----,1-+-----+l-1--,-----r-----,/ O 85 170 340 m N Scale 1 :8 ,000 The City of Maple Ridge makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy or present status of the information shown on this map. City of Maple Ridge Legal Notification 2.0 Printed: January 24, 2024 ~ Maple Ridee ~ I APPENDIX 2 Public Notice Brewery Lounge Endorsement The City of Maple Ridge gives notice that it is seeking public opinion on the following proposed Brewery Lounge Endorsement Application. Applicant: The Patch Brewery Inc. Establishment Location: 12745 Laity Street, Maple Ridge PROPOSED Hours of Liquor Sales: Monday to Sunday-9:00 am to 10:00 pm Persons who consider themselves affected by this application are requested to make written submissions in the form of a letter addressed to Jaci Diachuk, Administrative Assistant, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9. You may send your letter by regular mail or e-mail to jdiachuk@mapleridge.ca Written submissions will be accepted until 4:00 pm July 8, 2024. Please note that all submissions will be considered a public document and all information contained in it will be publicly available. For further information or clarification only, on the proposed Brewery Lounge Endorsement Licence Application, contact Jaci Diachuk, Administrative Assistant at 604-467-7391 between 8:00 am and 3:00 pm Monday to Friday. City of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge BC V2X 6A9 MapleRidge.Ca @YourMapleRidge ~ Maple Ridee ~ Council Report TO: His Worship Mayor Dan Ruimy MEETING DATE: July 23, 2024 FILE NO: 13-6430-04 MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Quarterly Report -Q2 2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council adopted the 2023-2026 Strategic Plan in May 2023, and approved Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) for its implementation in October 2023, forming the 2024 Strategic Work Plan. Quarterly updates on the Strategic Work Plan provide Council oversight on progress being made in relation to strategic objectives. The Quarter 2 updates are provided in Attachment A. RECOMMENDATION: For information DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Attachment A -Quarterly Report Q2 2024, is the second report from the City's Enterprise Performance Management system. It is organized to show the status of strategic initiatives that support each Objective and Key Result. The report identifies the status and projected 3969475 completion date for Key Results. Timeframes, visual and written status updates for initiatives are also provided along with details from the previous quarter's update . Symbols and colours are used to readily communicate the status of projects, as listed in Table 1. Staff are in the process of building out a community dashboard to present this information on the City's website. The dashboard will be made available on the Council Strategic Plan webpage in August. Page 1 of 2 Symbol Name • In Progress • Needs Attention • Under Review • Not Started ✓ Complete Table 1 -Status Legend ~ Maple Ridee -Council Report The next update on progress made during Quarter 3 will occur in alignment with the City's business planning process in the_fEJ.L '/?. ~ Prepared ti ~ Olivieri Approved by. Concurrence: Attachments: Director of Strategic Development, Communications & Public Engagement ScottHa~ Chief Administrative Officer (A) Quarterly Report -Q2 2024 3969475 Page 2 of 2 Presented by: Quarterly Report –Q2 2024 Status Legend Symbol Name In Progress Needs Attention Under Review Not Started Complete City of Maple Ridge Corporate Plan Element Summary Views Detail Views Key Results • Liveable Community Quarterly Report • Diversified, Thriving Economy Quarterly Report • Engaged, Healthy Community Quarterly Report • Climate Leadership & Environmental Stewardship Quarterly Report • Governance & Corporate Excellence Quarterly Report Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 2 of 23 Liveable Community Quarterly Report City of Maple Ridge Corporate Plan Home Key Results Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 OBJECTIVES Facilitate expanded housing diversity and supply, to promote attainability Create development application prioritization criteria 12/31/24 12/31/24 Create development application prioritization criteria - UBCM Local Government Development Approvals Program funding was confirmed on June 19. - A Request for Proposals (RFP) is in development for the full scope of work included in the grant application, which encompasses the prioritization framework. - The RFP is anticipated to be out to market in July. - Work is expected to commence in September. Increase housing supply, as measured by permitted units, by 2.5% 9/30/26 6/30/24 Update Housing Strategy Draft Housing Strategy 'Road Map' presented at the April 23 Workshop Session for Council discussion. Work is underway and will be brought back to Council in conjunction with the updated Interim Housing Needs Report. 6/30/24 Update Housing Needs Assessment Interim results presented to Council at the February 27 Workshop session. Following the recent publication of the Housing Need Regulations by the Province, final results of the Interim Housing Needs Report Update will be presented to Council at the end of Q3 2024. 12/31/24 Conduct an incentive program feasibility assessment 12/31/24 Develop pre-approved site plans for a range of housing units 12/31/24 Update city-wide density bonusing programs Secure 30 below market housing units 12/31/25 12/31/24 Identify inclusionary zoning options 3/31/25 Develop concierge service to facilitate affordable housing development - UBCM Local Government Development Approvals Program funding was confirmed on June 19. - A Request for Proposals (RFP) is in development for the full scope of work included in the grant application, which encompasses the prioritization framework. - The RFP is anticipated to be out to market in July. - Work is expected to commence in September. Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 3 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Increase the multi-unit housing portion of building stock by 4% 12/31/26 12/31/24 Conduct wrap-around servicing assessment for the Lougheed Transit Corridor Area Plan 12/31/24 Review parking and mobility requirements for transit-oriented areas The City's Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw is under comprehensive review, and will be back before Council in Q3 2024. Establish benchmark timelines for internal City processes and reviews within the development application process 12/31/24 12/31/24 Establish benchmark timelines for Planning department processes and reviews within the development application process - UBCM Local Government Development Approvals Program funding was confirmed on June 19. - A Request for Proposals (RFP) is in development for the full scope of work included in the grant application, which encompasses the prioritization framework. - The RFP is anticipated to be out to market in July. - Work is expected to commence in September. Complete alignment of CMR regulations and policies with Homes for People provincial strategy 12/31/24 6/30/24 Complete alignment of City of Maple Ridge regulations and policies with Homes for People provincial strategy Under the recent legislative changes at the provincial level, local governments have until June 30, 2024 to update their regulations and policies to reflect the direction identified for small scale multi unit housing. This work item was conducted and completed in June 2024. OBJECTIVES Improve mobility with safe, sustainable and effective transportation options Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 4 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Include a complete east to west AAA bike route from 240th to Maple Meadows station in the 5-year Capital Plan 12/31/24 5/15/25 Include a complete east to west AAA bike route from 240th to Maple Meadows station in the 5-year Capital Plan Hammond Road is Complete Thorne Avenue 203 to 207 is proposed for design in 2024 (300k) and Construction in 2025 (3.3M) 117 Avenue 207 to Laity is complete Laity 117 to H7 is complete H7 Laity to 216 is complete Gap H7 216 to 220 is delayed for coordination with upcoming BRT H7 from 220 to 222 is complete Gap A route through the Town Centre has yet to be established and prioritized in the capital plan. The Town Centre Road Network Strategy will confirm the route, a capital submission for design and construction is not in the 2024-2028 capital plan. Lougheed 227 to Burnett is identified in the capital plan with 500k for design in 2026 and 4.35M for construction in 2028 Gap The last stretch from Burnett to 240 is not identified in the current 2024-28 capital plan. Install 30 secure bike and micro- mobility lockers within the civic centre area 8/31/24 8/31/24 Install 30 secure bike and micro-mobility lockers within the civic centre area • RFP issued, closed June 12th • Proponent selected • In negotiations with proponent. Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 5 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Increase cycling network length by three kilometers 12/31/25 12/31/25 Increase cycling network length by three kilometers 3 Projects Identified that consist of 4km of cycling infrastructure (800m) Thorne Avenue from 203 Street to 207 Street Multi-use pathway • Design funding in 2024, construction funding in 2025 (1,600m) 232 Street from Abernethy Way to Fern Avenue Interim Cycling Improvements • No specific funding identified. Will use Cycling Improvements Fund LTC 016021 for Design • Construction funding TBD. (1,600m) Dewdney Trunk Road from 240 Street to 248 Street Interim Active Transportation Improvements • No specific funding identified. Will use Cycling Improvements Fund LTC 016021 for Design • Construction funding TBD. OBJECTIVES Develop infrastructure that positions the City to provide accessible and sustainable services while accommodating growth Update funding strategy for asset replacement and maintenance building off existing funding policy 9/30/24 9/30/24 Update funding strategy for asset replacement and maintenance building off existing funding policy Develop an Asset Management Strategy 6/30/24 12/31/24 Develop an Asset Management Strategy for the City Draft Asset Management Strategy is under review. Steven Faltas met with Elio Ibrahim at PSD to inform him of the internal changes and to instruct him that Steve is to be him primary contact moving forward. Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 6 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Establish servicing plans, including green infrastructure solutions, to service 3 key growth areas 3/31/25 3/31/25 Establish servicing plans, including green infrastructure solutions, to service 3 key growth areas At the macro level, we are currently updating our water and sewer models to incorporate the latest land use plans and assumptions provided by the Planning Department. The updated models will form the basis for planning servicing to three growth areas. Additionally, a citywide drainage model is in development that will improve the City's ability to assess and plan its drainage system. At a smaller scale, our current priority is assessing scenarios for additional densification in Northeast Albion and associated water and sewer infrastructure servicing requirements. OBJECTIVES Foundational Initiatives for Liveable Community Foundational Initiatives for Liveable Community N/A 3/31/24 Provide update on Local Government Act - Bill 26 12/31/25 Official Community Plan and Zoning Bylaw Update - Initial Work Recent provincial legislation announcements require the City to update the Official Community Plan. To complete the implementation of the updated Official Community Plan, the Zoning Bylaw will also need to be updated. This work is anticipated to commence in 2024 and complete by the end of 2025. Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 7 of 23 Diversified, Thriving Economy Quarterly Report City of Maple Ridge Corporate Plan Home Key Results Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 OBJECTIVES Attract, retain and expand business investment to diversify the tax base and increase local employment Complete a Business Retention & Expansion (BR&E) Analysis and Implementation Plan 12/31/24 12/31/24 Develop business retention and expansion analysis and implementation plan Scope development for RFP underway; scope completing in July and issuance of RFP shortly thereafter. Develop an Incentive Strategy for New Business Attraction 9/30/25 12/31/24 Develop an Incentive Strategy for New Business Attraction Continued environmental scan underway, scan of best practices and engagement with internal departments. Develop an Investment Attraction Strategy for targeted industries, including a value/supply chain strategy 12/31/24 12/31/24 Conduct investment attraction analysis and Implementation plan for targeted industries RFP scope development underway and scoping anticipated complete July 11 and issuance of RFP shortly thereafter. Ensure that the business licensing process and service delivery is capable of processing 20% more applications annually 12/31/24 12/31/24 Increase staffing levels for business licensing processing • Budget incremental request for additional staff was not approved • Will be brought forward again during next budget process • This item will be removed from future reporting 12/31/24 Complete business license process and digital application review Review of process improvements underway. OBJECTIVES Expand training and educational options in Maple Ridge to build a skilled workforce that attracts innovative businesses Create a formal, collaborative partnership with a post-secondary institution 9/30/25 12/31/24 Collaborate with post-secondary institutions on feasibility study to develop and sustain program training that addresses workforce needs Engagement with Feasibility Analysis consortia partners and Consulting group in July for more engagement into fall of 2024. Planning for a Global Cafe for Post Secondary will be starting shortly. 12/31/25 Pre-work for: Creating a formalized partnership with a post secondary institution Engagement underway with multiple Post Secondary Institutions, (Universities, Polytechnics, and private post secondary institutions included) to explore the potential of partnership. Establish a collaborative Tech Hub to specifically nurture the growth of technologically inclined entrepreneurs 6/30/25 6/30/25 Establish a collaborative Tech Hub to specifically nurture the growth of technologically inclined entrepreneurs Potential for partnership / engagement with post secondary institutions (PSI) in the region - initial dialogue has begun Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 8 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Complete a Labour Market and Gap Analysis 12/31/24 12/31/24 Conduct Labour Market Gap Analysis Scoping underway, review of grants to help with leveraging additional funding potential for project also underway. Engagement with potential partners like Work BC and others is underway. OBJECTIVES Explore and maximize tourism opportunities as a means to further diversify the local economy Implement a net promotor score for Adventure Hub, Urban Hot Spots, and Farm Fresh experiences , set the baseline, and improve by 20% 12/31/25 12/31/25 Implement Net Promoter Score for Adventure Hub, Urban Hot Spots, and Farm Fresh Experiences with a set baseline and improve by 20% by the end of 2025 Scoping for Net Promoter Score in 2024 underway with then efforts and rescope of NPS for 2025. 12/31/25 Implement a 'Big Tent' pilot program De-prioritized as a part of Budget 2024. 12/31/25 Complete regulatory review of eco-tourism, adventure tourism and agri-tourism policies This work will conduct a comprehensive examination of policies governing nature- based travel, thrilling experiences, and farm-oriented getaways to ensure City regulations enable sustainable development, safeguard natural habitats, and foster economic growth. Increase film-based tourism by 10% 12/31/24 11/30/24 Electrification of Railway Lot for film (Creative BC Reel Green Grant)) and continued through BC hydro incentive offer An electrical kiosk for sustainable film use has been designed. The project was tendered in May 2024 and construction has started. The project is anticipated to be completed in October 2024. 12/31/24 Implement a circular economy program to re-purpose film set materials Initial contact with companies that can be a pilot provider(s) - working through potential sites that can work for the film industry as well as City Bylaws to ensure compliance. Develop an event attraction strategy for tourist-driven events aligned with community-based events 12/31/24 12/31/24 Develop an Event Attraction Strategy for Tourist-driven Events Aligned with Community Based Events Initial scope and review procurement process underway. Engagement with procurement in May and establishment of working group completed. Scope completed in July 2024 with RFP expected shortly thereafter. OBJECTIVES Foundational Initiatives for Diversified, Thriving Economy Foundational Initiatives for Diversified, Thriving Economy N/A 12/31/24 Facilitate Downtown Revitalization Initiatives Initial awareness building with internal departments as well as awareness building with BIA / Chamber and area businesses regarding the intent to engage on downtown revitalization in 2024. Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 9 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 6/30/25 Conduct Albion Industrial Land Use and Servicing Analysis As Albion Industrial continues to attract investor attention as a location for new development, drainage analysis and planning is required to better accommodate future development. 6/30/25 Refresh Agricultural Plan Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 10 of 23 Engaged, Healthy Community Quarterly Report City of Maple Ridge Corporate Plan Home Key Results Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 OBJECTIVES Provide a diversity of inclusive and accessible recreation opportunities Conduct Recreation Facility Accessibility audit to Rick Hansen Guideline standards 12/31/24 12/31/24 Complete Recreation Facility Accessibilty Audit • Facility evaluation complete • Three areas identified for Rick Hansen funding prioritization include: • Front counter of Maple Ridge Leisure Centre • Emergency system visibility enhancements to Maple Ridge Leisure Centre • Improved parking areas at Maple Ridge Leisure Centre and City Hall Ensure at least 70% of residents, as measured by households, have access to one free community event within a 15-minute walk of their home 12/31/24 12/31/24 Host 3 Rock the Block Events Due to safety concerns regarding a forecast of lightning. Rock the Block Date #2 - Silver Valley has been rescheduled to return to Blaney Hamlet Park on August 24th. Increase participation in subsidized recreation programs by 10% through the development of City-specific criteria on financial access funding 12/31/24 12/31/24 Develop City-specific criteria on financial access funding OBJECTIVES Build and celebrate community pride, strengthening community connections to foster a sense of belonging Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 11 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Conduct a Recreation Facility Feasibility Study 12/31/24 11/29/24 Conduct an aquatics feasibility study to contemplate a second aquatics facility The Phase 1 Engagement Summary was released in April 2024, and provided in- depth information on the public's needs and wants for recreation facility amenities and services. These results along with the service demand analysis and the ongoing progression of technical studies has significantly influenced the thoughtful planning and development of building site concept plans. It is these plans that will provide further details into the shaping of a new recreation facility at Hammond Community Park. The technical analysis including archeological, geotechnical and traffic and parking assessments, along with the building design concepts will be shared with the public in a second round of community engagement in September 2024. A parallel project that will emerge should the Recreation Facility Feasibility Study progress to the next stages in late 2024, is the relocation of the baseball diamonds currently at Hammond Community Park. Staff are in the preliminary stages of planning for this relocation. Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 12 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Support the Maple Ridge 2024 BC Summer Games 10/31/24 10/31/24 Support the Maple Ridge 2024 BC Summer Games The Summer Games Board of Directors are closing in on the final weeks of planning and preparations for the 2024 BC Summer Games in mid-July. Volunteer recruitment continues to be a large focus, as is scheduling and training of the 1000+volunteers that will help with the Games. Numerous logistical plans are in near completed and are being tested in advance of the Games weekend and adjusted as needed. Designated venue sites for sport and not-sport events are receiving their final finishing touches in preparation of hosting over 3000 participants. Public communications and promotions, both print and online, have increased this month as the organizing committee launches some key initiatives such as the merchandise store, designs for the participant badges and lanyards, design and production of volunteer uniforms, and development of the recognition signs that will be placed across Maple Ridge, highlighting the numerous sponsors and supporters that have contributed to the planning and anticipated success of the 2024 Summer Games. Detailed planning continues for the Opening Ceremony celebration that will welcome 8000 participants and spectators to Albion Sports Complex the evening of July 18th. The opening ceremonies requires involvement by nearly all 14 Summer Games planning areas and will be the largest City celebration in one spot, at one time in many years. Develop and deliver four events to celebrate the 150th Anniversary of Maple Ridge 12/31/24 12/31/24 Maple Ridge 150 Celebration Events Building marketing and branding assets for release in July leading up to and following BC Summer Games. Internal staff education campaign on MR150 and Our Neck of the Woods. Inclusion of MR150 activations within community events including Multiculturalism Day, National Indigenous Peoples Day, and Pride in the Park. Increase participation in City supported volunteer programs by 10% 6/30/24 6/30/24 Develop a Volunteer Retention Strategy for BC Summer Games Volunteers Staff are working through finalizing the strategy for implementation starting in July. OBJECTIVES Promote a vibrant arts and culture community Implement Public Art streams to support the new Public Art Policy and Handbook 12/31/24 12/31/24 Transition the Public Art guidelines into a policy for Council endorsement Cross departmental collaboration ongoing. Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 13 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Initiate, through partnership, a Museum Needs Assessment 12/31/24 12/31/24 Initiate a Museum Needs Assessment June 11 - Presentation by Historical Society to Council. OBJECTIVES Ensure the safety and enhance the well-being of residents Develop a Community Safety Action Plan 6/30/24 12/31/24 Develop a Community Safety Action Plan City Staff supported the work of the consultant who drafted the Community Safety Action Plan report. Bylaw, Police, and Fire attended engagement sessions and shared their feedback. Operationalize Phase 1 of the Fire Master Plan 12/31/25 12/31/24 Fire Master Plan #17 Career Suppression Capacity Recruitment for the additional Suppression FF's is currently at the testing phase. Written tests have been completed as has the endurance/skills assessment components. Panel interviews followed by ride-a-longs are being scheduled for candidates moving forward. These additional FF's will result in the city having a second due fire unit available to respond from Fire Hall 1 12/31/24 Fire Master Plan #20 Prevention Branch Preparing to post two positions in order to support Community Risk Reduction initiatives related to Prevention and Public Education. 12/31/24 Fire Master Plan # 3 Corporate Integration Buidling strong corporate relationships with Fire and multiple CMR departments. Collaborating with Bylaws, Planning, Legislative Services, IT, HR and RCMP to achieve corporate goals. 12/31/24 Fire Master Plan # 8 Climate Change & # 28 Apparatus Moving forward on the research and planning towards the implementation of an EV emergency response Light Rescue unit which will require electrical infrastructure installation at Fire Hall 1. Exploring the option of replacing one of the Command vehicles with a Hybrid model. 12/31/24 Fire Master Plan # 31 Emergency Program Resourcing Successfully recruited a Corporate Emergency Program Manager to start June 3. Engagement with Metro Vancouver has resumed with dialogue related to the Lower Fraser River Floodplains regional actions as well as Wildfire interface challenges. Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 14 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Complete a de-integration transition plan for Ridge Meadows RCMP 12/31/25 12/31/24 Complete a de-integration transition plan for Ridge Meadows RCMP OBJECTIVES Improve community engagement with the City Establish a public participation and engagement framework 12/31/24 3/31/25 Develop and implement public engagement framework and toolkit. The City of Maple Ridge is developing a Framework to meet the City’s Strategic Goal of improving community engagement. This Framework will serve as a guiding document to enhance community input in municipal decision-making processes. It will ensure that how, when, and why the City engages with the public is consistent, transparent, and accessible. It will also provide clear criteria for what level of public participation will be involved in decision-making. This will help ensure that residents are aware of the City’s public engagement processes and when they have an opportunity to share their feedback. The Community Engagement Framework project deliverables will include: • A clear and consistent engagement process, including a defined City engagement delivery model based on industry best practices and in-house planning and delivery criteria. • Community Engagement Policy supported by Council. • Staff Engagement Guide, training, toolkit, and resources. • Community education to inform the public about City decision-making processes, why they should engage, how their input is used, and how they can participate. Increase community activity on Engage MR by 20% 12/31/24 12/31/24 Increase community activity on Engage MR by 20% Conduct a participatory budget pilot project 9/30/24 9/30/24 Conduct a participatory budget pilot project • Background research complete • Scoping report to Council scheduled for July 23 • Council direction will inform a draft guidebook for presentation in September OBJECTIVES Foundational Initiatives for Engaged, Healthy Community Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 15 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Foundational Initiatives for Engaged, Healthy Community N/A 12/31/24 Contract with Community Safety Expert Consultants On December 21, 2023, Rob Thiessen and CAO Scott Hartman entered into a 12-month agreement for the provision of consulting services for the Community Social Safety Initiative. 12/31/24 Implement Heritage Grant Five-Year Pilot Program The Heritage Grant Pilot Program stems from the 2013 Heritage Plan and is built on and further supported by the recently endorsed Heritage Plan 2024 - 2034 as identified under Goal 4: Support Community Conservation Action 4.3. The 2024-2025 season is anticipated to be the inaugural launch of the Heritage Grant Pilot Program. 12/31/24 Develop Heritage Related Event connected to Maple Ridge 150 12/31/24 Implement Overnight Security Services in Downtown Core Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 16 of 23 Climate Leadership & Environmental Stewardship Quarterly Report City of Maple Ridge Corporate Plan Home Key Results Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 OBJECTIVES Mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change Develop and adopt a Climate Action Plan 3/31/25 3/31/25 Develop a Climate Action Plan The Climate Action Plan is underway on several components (GHG Inventory, Climate Risk and Hazards framework, Land Use Planning). First phase of public engagement began May 2024 and ends July 2024 Climate Action Plan | Engage Maple Ridge 9/30/24 Complete Multi-Hazard Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment Work is underway and forms part of the development of the Climate Action Plan. 9/30/24 Conduct extreme temperature risk mapping analysis Work is underway and forms part of the development of the Climate Action Plan. Develop and implement green infrastructure design and maintenance specifications, guidelines, and performance standards 3/31/25 12/1/24 Develop and implement green infrastructure design and maintenance specifications, guidelines, and performance standards • The project has been put on hold due to vacancies in key positions related to the project. • Project will resume in the fall pending the completion of recruitment processes. OBJECTIVES Reduce municipal and community greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with adopted targets Develop a master plan for reducing the reliance on natural gas for all facilities and implement a solar energy project 12/31/24 12/31/24 Develop master plan to reduce reliance on natural gas for all facilities The Municipality is committed to actioning and facilitating the reduction of emissions in alignment with their independent emissions reductions target. The buildings identified for this study represent the largest end-users of energy in the Municipalities corporate portfolio and those that demonstrate a favourable profile as a candidate for emissions reduction. Factors that will be considered within this study shall include, but are not limited to, equipment condition, capital planning schedule and significance to Municipal operations. The outcomes of this study will include building-level emissions reduction measure analysis and portfolio-wide GHG reduction planning recommendations that the Municipality can implement to achieve their climate goals and targets. This study is in partnership with Fortis BC and should start in the Fall. Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 17 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 12/31/24 Implement a solar energy project for a municipal facility This project is dependent on results from the building decarbonization master plan project which will identify the optimal site for implementation of a photo- voltaic system. Develop framework for climate and resilience as a lens for City decision making 9/30/24 11/29/24 Develop a framework for climate and resilience as a lens for City decision making Staff have developed a climate and resiliency lens and now working to incorporate into staff reporting. Ensure the City is green fleet ready for passenger vehicles & light-duty fleet 12/31/25 9/27/24 Secure Natural Resource Canada Zero Emissions Vehicle funding • Funding intake anticipated to open in July • Application development underway in tandem with Fleet EV Transition Plan • Application submission planned for August 12/31/24 Phase 1: Install 20 Level 2 EV fleet chargers Dependent on the attainment of Natural Resources Canada Zero Emissions Vehicle Infrastructure Program funding. 9/30/25 Phase 2: Install 20 Level-2 and 2 Level-3 EV fleet EV chargers Dependent on the attainment of Natural Resources Canada Zero Emissions Vehicle Infrastructure Program funding. OBJECTIVES Enhance and protect the health of our natural environment Establish an inventory and baseline of bio-diversity health 5/31/25 5/31/25 Establish an inventory and baseline of bio-diversity health A scope of work has been developed for the project and staff working group identified. An RFP is in development, to be issued in in fall 2024. Develop a strategy to manage the health of the McKenney Creek system 12/31/24 12/31/24 Develop a strategy to manage the health of the McKenney Creek system This project has not been started based on current project priority rankings. Protect and conserve 9 hectares of land 12/31/25 7/31/24 Protect and conserve 9 hectares of land Complete an Urban Forest Management Strategy 3/31/24 7/31/24 Develop an Urban Forest Management Strategy Thank you to those who attended our virtual open house on March 11, 2024 and participated in our survey that closed on March 24, 2024 to provide feedback on our draft Urban Forest Management Strategy. Your input is important for setting a shared vision and priorities for urban forest management in Maple Ridge. Stay tuned while we summarize the findings of the Phase 2 public engagement and report on what we've learned. The strategy document will be finalized and be brought back to Council for final endorsement in July OBJECTIVES Foundational Initiatives for Climate Leadership & Environmental Stewardship Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 18 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Foundational Initiatives for Climate Leadership & Environmental Stewardship N/A 3/31/25 Conduct a Foodwaste Reduction Pilot Project • Funding for community pilot project unsuccessful. • Small municipal building pilot continues. • This item will be removed from future reporting as the project will not proceed. Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 19 of 23 Governance & Corporate Excellence Quarterly Report City of Maple Ridge Corporate Plan Home Key Results Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 OBJECTIVES Identify and commit to opportunities for the City to move forward on a path of Truth and Reconciliation Develop the City's Indigenous Relations and Engagement Strategy 12/31/24 12/31/24 Develop a Framework for Municipal Truth and Reconciliation Work has begun in June with the support of Indigenous consulted services to engage on various relationship building, project-based initiatives and the development of a City Indigenous Relations Strategy. Host two Council relationship-building meetings with Katzie First Nation and Kwantlen First Nation leadership 12/31/24 12/31/24 Facilitate regular Council to Council meetings with Katzie and Kwantlen First Nations. Council to Council regular meetings have been established. Meeting will continue to occur progressively throughout the year. OBJECTIVES Deliver an exceptional customer experience across City services Develop and implement a strategy, including standards and principles, to provide exceptional customer experiences 6/30/25 11/30/24 Develop and implement a customer experience strategy and framework • Request for Proposals closed on June 18 with seven submissions. • Evaluation panel to review submissions in early July. • Project kick-off anticipated for September. Develop an evaluation framework for ongoing customer experience assessment 3/31/25 3/31/25 Develop an evaluation framework for ongoing customer experience assessment Initiation of this project is dependent on the development of the customer experience framework. OBJECTIVES Be accountable to the public through open and responsive governance Ensure that 75% of existing policies have been updated within the last 2 years 12/31/25 12/31/25 Complete a Policy Review Review of policies is ongoing. Policies no. 5.47, 5.48 and 30.13 rescinded in June 2024. Implement an Enterprise Performance Management system (EPM) 6/30/24 6/30/24 Implement an Enterprise Performance Management system System has been deployed successfully. OBJECTIVES Ensure the City is organizationally resilient, ready to adapt to a changing environment Develop and implement an enhanced risk management program 9/30/26 9/30/26 Develop a Risk Management framework to enable the development of a program Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 20 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Develop a records management program 9/30/24 9/30/24 Complete development of a records management framework The Records Management Framework project plan and charter is being drafted to capture framework, technical, legislative, and corporate requirements. Develop a business continuity program 3/31/25 3/31/25 Facilitate the development of a Business Continuity Program Conduct one Emergency Operations Centre exercise 12/31/24 12/31/24 Conduct one Emergency Operations Centre exercise Deploy a continuous improvement program and conduct training with a cohort of staff 9/30/24 12/31/24 Implement a continuous improvement Centre of Excellence • Program development is complete • Internal marketing and educational campaign to take place over the summer • Base training to be made available to staff in July • First cohort to commence advanced training in September Develop an Intergovernmental Relations Strategy for relationship building and advocacy to advance key city priorities 6/30/24 9/30/24 Develop the City's Intergovernmental Relations Strategy A City Intergovernmental Relations Strategy building upon the Maple Ridge Moves Plan is being developed which will progress Council's Strategic plan and key priorities for relationship building at all levels of government and the advancement of partnerships. OBJECTIVES Ensure organization and financial alignment to achieve Strategic Priorities and meet the needs of our growing community Review and consolidate City fees and charges into a single bylaw with annual review dates 3/31/25 12/30/24 Review and consolidate Building Services Department fees • Building fees to be updated in conjunction with comprehensive Building Bylaw review. • Revies currently underway with amended Building Bylaw anticipated for late 2024. 9/30/24 Review and consolidate Soil Removal, Tree Protection and Highway & Traffic fees 3/31/25 Review and consolidate Fire Protection, Cemetery, Water Service and Sewer Service fees 6/7/24 Review Police Services Fees and Charges • Regional analysis is complete and recommended rates identified. • A Council report recommending the new fees will be presented in July. Complete a major Development Cost Charges review 12/31/25 12/31/25 Major DCC Amendment Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 21 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 Optimize the City’s business and financial planning process 12/31/24 6/28/24 Optimize the City’s business and financial planning process • Process review recommendations complete • Near-term enhancements will be embedded in the 2025 Business Planning process by July • Long-term enhancements to be included in 2026 Business Planning process • Council to receive 2025 Business Planning Guidelines in July OBJECTIVES Foundational Initiatives for Governance & Corporate Excellence Foundational Initiatives for Governance & Corporate Excellence N/A 12/31/24 Design and Develop Exempt Performance Management Program Performance planning framework developed. System software development in progress. 12/31/24 Update Financial Sustainability Policy Work is in preliminary phases. 12/31/24 Design, Develop and Implement Leadership Learning and Development Strategy • Learning & Development framework developed • Strategy being refined. • Commencement on workplan underway. 6/30/24 Commence Negotiations and Collective Bargaining with IAFF for 2022 onwards Awaiting final edits and finishing touches on documentation from RES 360 (Metro Van) 6/30/24 Commence Negotiations and Collective Bargaining with CUPE for 2023 onwards This item is in Closed Meeting. 12/31/24 Initiate HRIS requirements gathering and feasibility study Requirements have been gathered. Waiting on completion of financial ERP rollout. 1/31/25 Design Occupational Health & Safety Strategic Plan Strategic Health and Safety framework developed. Work on key foundational pillars of program has commenced. 11/29/24 Host one regional Leadership Summit in 2024 One Leadership Summit is earmarked for Fall (November) 2024. 12/31/24 Develop Archaeological Management Plan The City is building out and refining key current archaeological policy, protocols and processes that will serve as a foundation while the broader Archaeological Management Plan is being developed. Support for this work will be included in the scope of Indigenous Relations Consultants hired by IGR. Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 22 of 23 Key Results KR End Date Initiative End Date Initiatives Initiative Status Icon Initiative External Update Q1-24 Q2-24 Q2-24 12/31/24 Design and Develop an Overarching Resourcing Plan Human Resources This is a closed item. Quarterly Report to Mayor and Council (Jun-24) Report City of Maple Ridge Generated 07/17/2024 4:22:17 pm Page 23 of 23