HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-05-21 Adopted Public Hearing Minutes.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge
PUBLIC HEARING
May 21, 2013
The Minutes of the Public Hearing held in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Hall, 11995
Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia on May 21, 2013 at 7:00 p.m.
PRESENT
Elected Officials
Mayor E. Daykin
Councillor C. Ashlie
Councillor C. Bell
Councillor J. Dueck
Councillor A. Hogarth
Councillor B. Masse
Councillor M. Morden
Appointed Staff
J. Rule, Chief Administrative Officer
R. Riach, Acting Corporate Officer
C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental
Services
A. Gaunt, Confidential Secretary
Mayor Daykin called the meeting to order. The Acting Corporate Officer explained the
procedure and rules of order of the Public Hearing and advised that the bylaws will be
considered further at the next Council Meeting on May 28, 2013.
The Mayor then called upon the Manager of Development and Environmental Services to
present the following items on the agenda:
1) 2011-069-RZ
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6986-2013
Legal:
Location:
Purpose:
From:
TO:
And:
Parcel T, District Lot 278, Group 1, New Westminster District,
Plan 52363
20660 Maple Crescent
To amend Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan as shown on
Map No. 851.
Urban Residential
Conservation
To amend Schedule "C" of the Official Community Plan as shown on
Map No. 852 to add as Conservation.
Public Hearing Minutes
May 21, 2013
Page 2 of 12
1a) 2011-069-RZ
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6845-2011
Legal:
Location:
From:
To:
Purpose:
Parcel T, District Lot 278, Group 1, New Westminster District,
Plan 52363
20660 Maple Crescent
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) and
C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
To permit a future subdivision into 2 lots.
The Acting Corporate Officer advised that no correspondence was received on this item.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a power point presentation
providing the following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Neighbourhood Context
• OCP Context
• Site Characteristics
• Terms and Conditions
Hugo Busch
Mr. Busch expressed concern pertaining to the property in its current state in terms of the
continuous dumping of garbage and undesirable activity after dark. He advised that he is a
retired forester and spoke to a number of trees on the site which he views as safety hazards.
He also expressed concern with the effect of development and fill on trees currently on the
property as well as on neighbouring properties.
There being no further comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
2) 2011-034-RZ
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6960-2012
Legal:
Location:
Purpose:
Lot B (BN161831), Section 3, Township 12, New Westminster District,
Plan 19526
24106 -102 Avenue
To amend Schedule "A" of the Official Community Plan as shown on
Map No. 845.
..
Public Hearing Minutes
May 21, 2013
Page 3 of 12
From:
To:
Medium Density Residential and Conservation
Medium Density Residential and Conservation
And: To amend Schedule "C" of the Official Community Plan as shown on
Map No. 846 to add to Conservation and to remove from Conservation.
2a) 2011-034-RZ
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6816-2011
Legal:
Location:
From:
To:
Purpose:
Lot B (BN16183), Section 3, Township 12, New Westminster District,
Plan 19526
24106-102 Avenue
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential}
R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
To permit a future subdivision into 3 lots.
The Acting Corporate Officer advised that correspondence opposing the application was
received from Shelley Larsen.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a power point presentation
providing the following information:
• Application Information
• OCP Context
• Site Plan
• Terms and Conditions
There being no comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
3) 2011-063-RZ
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6854-2011
Legal:
Location:
From:
Lot 107, District Lot 242, Group 1, New Westminster District,
Plan 46729
20974-123 Avenue
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Public Hearing Minutes
May 21, 2013
Page 4 of 12
To:
Purpose:
RS-1b (One Family (Medium Density) Urban Residential)
To permit a future subdivision into 6 lots.
The Acting Corporate Officer advised that correspondence opposing the application was
received from Blake Handford and Helen Kita, Yani Mitchell and Robin Dhir.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a power point presentation
providing the following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Neighbourhood Context
• OCP Context
• Site Characteristics
• Proposed Subdivision Plan
• Terms and Conditions
Blake Handford
Mr. Handford highlighted points from a letter forwarded to Mayor and Council. He is not
opposed to densification in the area, however, feels that the application for six lots is too
high due to the existing congestion in the area. He asked whether consideration could be
given to allowing driveways to connect to 123 Avenue two at a time. Mr. Handford spoke to
the possible compromise of root systems of existing trees on the property as a result of
other trees being taken down. He indicated that there are rats on the property and
wondered where the rats will go once the buildings are demolished. He also asked that the
water table and flooding problems in the area be considered. Mr. Handford also expressed
concern with the placement of a surveyor ribbon and asked who would bear the cost of
replacing an existing fence.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services advised that he will provide
request that the developer provide answers to questions asked by Mr. Handford and
suggested follow up with the file manager. He provided information on the building
envelope, lot grading, drainage on the site and work done to preserve trees on the site. He
advised that he will provide the number of the surveyor to Mr. Handford. He also advised
that the developer will be asked to deal with any issues concerning rats.
Robin Dhir -Applicant
Mr. Dhir spoke to the concern pertaining to the fence on the property. He advised that any
issue pertaining to rats will be addressed and that he is open to any concerns and questions
residents of the neighbourhood may have.
Public Hearing Minutes
May 21, 2013
Page 5 of 12
Blake Handford
Mr. Handford asked how the development will affect the property taxes in the area.
There being no further comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
4) RZ/004/06-01
Legal:
Location:
Lot 1, District Lot 241, Group 1, Plan New Westminster District
Plan 69727
Parcel 2, (RP17121) of PCL B (RP16630) of Lot 1,
District Lot 241, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan 4921
Parcel A, (EXPL PL11166) Lot 1, Except PCL B (Expl Pl 16630) and
Except
Part subdivided by Pl 69727, District Lot 241, Group 1,
New Westminster District Plan 4921
12140, 12142 and 12170 203 Street
Purpose: To release the Restrictive Covenant Restricting Basements.
The Acting Corporate Officer advised that no correspondence was received on this item.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services advised that application
RZ/004/06-01 is not a rezoning application. He explained that it is an application to
remove a covenant to remove restrictions on basements in the subdivision. He advised on
the reasons to allow removal of the restrictive covenant.
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Neighbourhood Context
• OCP Context
• Site Characteristics
• Subdivision Plan
• Recommendation
There being no comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
5) 2012-049-RZ
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6979-2013
Legal:
Location:
Part NE ¼, Group 1, North of LMP6073, District Lot 7890, Section
19, Township 15
12420 -269 Street
Public Hearing Minutes
May 21, 2013
Page 6 of 12
Purpose:
From:
To:
And:
5a) 2012-049-RZ
To amend Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan as shown on
Map No. 848.
Suburban Residential
Conservation
To amend Schedule "C" of the Official Community Plan as shown on
Map No. 849 to add to Conservation.
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6930-2012
Legal:
Location:
From:
To:
Purpose:
Part NE¼, Group 1, North of LMP6073, District Lot 7890, Section
19, Township 15
12420 -269 Street
A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
To permit a future subdivision of 91 one acre lots.
The Acting Corporate Officer advised that correspondence opposing the application was
received from Ken and Kelly Casper.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a power point presentation
providing the following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Neighbourhood Context
• OCP Context
• Site Characteristics
• Subdivision Plan
• Terms and Conditions
Ken Casper
Mr. Casper cited the environmental report provided by the developer pertaining to wildlife
corridors being provided to adjacent feeding areas and stating the importance of existing
wildlife corridors in the area and that all attempts be made to preserve these corridors. Mr.
Casper spoke to complexity of the parcel and the numerous watercourses in the area and
stated that the proposed development backs onto Crown land. He expressed concern that
Public Hearing Minutes
May 21, 2013
Page 7 of 12
the wildlife coming down from above into the dedicated park will be stopped by a fence
around the development and will have nowhere to go. He requested that a wildlife corridor
be incorporated into the development from the south end of the property linking McFadden
Creek and Cooper's Creek through a covenant as well as on the east side of the property.
He also expressed concern with the continuous revisions to the proposed development over
time.
Neil Maxwell
Mr. Maxwell stated that he attended the developer's public information meeting and
expressed concern with the placement of a trail in the central park. He advised that the
issue was resolved and that the trail has been moved. Mr. Maxwell expressed concern with
the use of the proposed multi-purpose trail by persons riding quads and/or motorcycles and
the fire hazards these vehicles may cause.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services spoke to the concerns of trail
usage by vehicles such as quads and motorcycles.
Jacquie Chow
Ms. Chow read from a prepared statement. She expressed concern with the unnecessary
burden on all taxpayers due to the cost of providing infrastructure to areas outside of the
urban boundary. She questioned why this type of development is approved when such large
sized lots are expensive to service and constitute sprawl. Ms. Chow spoke to increases in
greenhouse gases which are in part perpetuated by such developments in rural Maple
Ridge. She provided a copy of her statement to the Acting Corporate Officer.
Steve Gadby
Mr. Gad by asked whether there will be restrictions on the length of time to construct the
proposed development and what type of restrictions are placed on times during the day and
week allowed for construction.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services advised that the District's noise
bylaw will address times during which construction can be carried out. He also advised that
the site will be developed in a phased approach.
Alex Horacsek
Mr. Horacsek expressed a number of concerns with the proposed development including the
negative impacts on his property in terms of privacy and noise and on the existing wildlife.
He requested that a 30 m setback be placed between his property and the proposed
subdivision to allow for continued privacy on his land. Mr. Horacsek also asked about the
effect of the proposed development on existing water pressure and how the increase in
traffic on 269 Street will be addressed in that there are no sidewalks on the street and it is
not currently wide enough for 2 cars. He felt there are too many unanswered questions
pertaining to the application and that he has not been contacted by the developer. He
would like to receive all answers addressing his concerns in writing.
Public Hearing Minutes
May 21, 2013
Page 8 of 12
Abraham Gagnon
Mr. Gagnon expressed concern with the impact of increased traffic on 269 Street and on the
privacy in the area as a result of the proposed development. He asked how the street will be
used by young families or for residents to walk along during the construction phase and
once the development is complete if there are no proper sidewalks. He questioned why he
was required to remove a culvert serving as a second entrance to his property yet a
development of 130 acres is allowed.
Mike Stefiuk
Mr. Stefiuk spoke to lots and a road in the development bordering onto the Blue Mountain
Woodlot. He expressed concern with the dissection of a riparian area and a wildlife corridor
into the mountain area and asked that a bridge be considered to allow animals to go under
the road. He also expressed concern with variances which may be given to allow
development to push into riparian zones with approval. He asked about a feature shown on
the subdivision plan map.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services advised that the feature
constitutes a manmade water course which will be enhanced to carry drainage from the site.
Mr. Stefiuk did not approve the location of the roadways for the development. He spoke to
his efforts to document the condition of the riparian corridors along McFadden Creek and
asked that the District enforce its bylaws and fines.
Kevin Healing -Creus Engineering Ltd.
Mr. Healing addressed several concerns brought forward. He advised that this property has
been part of the Official Community Plan as a residential development for quite some time
and that issues have been discussed with the District or with the existing neighbourhood.
He addressed the question of setbacks and the use of municipal infrastructure, advising
that the development will be on septic systems and that although the development will be
on the municipal water system, funds will go towards the municipality in the form of DCC's.
Mr. Heeling also advised that the development will be carried out in phases and addressed
the concern over lack of water pressure. He also spoke to crossings to be provided for the
movement of wildlife in the area.
Alex Horacsek
Mr. Horacsek advised that the creek flowing through the front of his property has in the past
flooded. He expressed concern that the redirection of any of the creeks on the site of the
proposed development may add to the possibility of flooding. He asked where residents can
go to hear answers on issues being brought forward and reiterated that he would like to
have answers in writing.
Mike Stefiuk
Mr. Stefiuk expressed concern over the impact of the proposed storm water management
plan and the detention ponds on McFadden Creek and the water feed system for the Bell
Irving Hatchery.
Public Hearing Minutes
May 21, 2013
Page 9 of 12
Ken Casper
Mr. Casper reiterated his concerns with the impact on wildlife coming off Blue Mountain and
where it will go upon coming to the fence line on the south side of the proposed
development.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services advised on discussions with the
developer pertaining to a buffer for wildlife.
Neil Maxwell
Mr. Maxwell felt that some of the lots in the proposed development will not support a type 1
septic field.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services advised that the installation of
septic fields is a subdivision approval condition and that the developer will be asked to
prove out servicing at that stage.
Mr. Maxwell asked whether this issue should be brought forward at Public Hearing;
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services advised that what has been
provided at Public Hearing was a draft conceptual plan of what may be developed. He
advised that all lots are expected to meet standards including the size of septic fields.
Kevin Healy -Creus Engineering Ltd.
Mr. Healy spoke to the concerns raised over the lack of buffers for wildlife as well as the
stormwater management system.
Alex Sartori -Sartori Environmental Services
Mr. Sartori advised that his firm conducted the majority of the environmental surveys on the
site and addressed concerns pertaining to the wildlife corridors.
Alex Horacsek
Mr. Horacsek did not agree with a scenario offered by the development engineer in terms of
buffers. He expressed that as the existing residents have been in the area a long time, the
developers of the new subdivision should accommodate the requests of these residents
particularly as pertains to buffers.
Mike Stefiuk
Mr. Stefiuk inquired about the access to the property to the north.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services advised there is no access to the
property to the north and explained the allowances for the area.
Mr. Stefiuk felt that the elimination of 5 lots in the top corner of the proposed subdivision
would best protect the wildlife corridor as well as the forest and the water in the area. He
expressed concern over the diminishing animal populations and the disappearance of
species as a result of construction.
Public Hearing Minutes
May 21, 2013
Page 10 of 12
Aaron McKellar
Mr. McKellar is not opposed to the application though he expressed concern with the fact
that although the new development will have sidewalks and other amenities, these will not
be provided further along 269 Street for use by existing property owners. He spoke to the
potential negative impact of increased traffic from the proposed development on 269 Street
and asked that thought be given to improving the street with some form of walkway or
sidewalk. He is in favour of a roadway to the north of the site to provide parking for those
who wish to participate in motor sport type sports.
Ken Casper
Mr. Casper stated that current residents moved into the area as they appreciate interactions
with wildlife. He asked for something in writing or a covenant to retain the existing treed
area.
Abraham Gagnon
Mr. Gagnon advised that his wife attended the development meeting for the application and
was told by an engineer at the meeting that 269 Street is not the concern of the developer
rather that of the municipality. Mr. Gagnon asked whose concern the street is and
questioned who will deal with the increase in traffic flow. He expressed concern that 269
Street was originally built to accommodate the current properties and not future
developments. He also expressed concern with the removal of trees and gave examples of
other developments in Maple Ridge where trees have not been preserved. He reiterated his
concern with the negative impact in terms of safety presented by increased traffic from the
proposed development.
Craig Ruthven
Mr. Ruthven asked whether this type of development is consistent with the Official
Community Plan.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services provided an explanation of the
history of the property in terms of a Official Community Plan designation. He advised that
the property is in conformity with the Official Community Plan.
Mr. Ruthven felt that the proposed development is an example of leapfrogging and that this
type of development should be challenged.
There being no further comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
6) 2012-040-RZ
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6984-2013
Legal:
Location:
Lots 1 & 2, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster Plan 12923
Lot 12, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster Plan 42419
10412, 10450 & 10500 Jackson Road
Public Hearing Minutes
May 21, 2013
Page 11 of 12
Purpose:
From:
To:
6a) 2012-040-RZ
To amend Schedule "A" of the Official Community Plan as shown on
Map No. 850.
Medium Density Residential and Low/Medium Density Residential
Low/Med Density Residential and Medium Density Residential
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6919-2012
Legal:
Location:
From:
To:
Purpose:
Lots 1 & 2, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster Plan 12923
Lot 12, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster Plan 42419
10412, 10450 & 10500 Jackson Road
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) & A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) & RS-1b (One Family
(Medium Density) Urban Residential)
To permit a future subdivision of approximately 131 lots.
The Acting Corporate Officer advised that correspondence expressing concern with the
application was received from Ray and Dianne McMurtry opposing the application.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a power point presentation
providing the following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Neighbourhood Context
• OCP Context
• Site Characteristics
• Proposed Subdivision Plan
• Terms and Conditions
Tracy Mcfarlane
Mrs. Mcfarlane advised she had asked the developer what will happen with a parcel of land
directly beside her house. She outlined where her lot is and described the trail and the green
space currently existing. She spoke to the lack of green space, park and play spaces in the
area and expressed concern that the proposed development will take away the remaining
green space which is heavily used by residents in the neighbourhood.
Public Hearing Minutes
May 21, 2013
Page 12 of 12
Paul Mcfarlane
Mr. Mcfarlane spoke to the proposed road heading northbound and the greenbelt bordering
the northside of his property. He asked if the road at 104 Street and MacEachern Street will
eliminate the existing green space path and expressed concern with a road going through
and the grading due to an extremely steep slope.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services addressed concerns pertaining to
the road. He advised that the Planning and Parks Departments are looking at the
development of a trail system in the area. He indicated an area within the proposed
development designated for lower density units which had been considered for park by the
District however due to steep slopes will remain in single family private ownership.
Ryan Lucy -Morningstar Homes
Mr. Lucy reiterated the statement of the Manager of Development and Environmental
Services pertaining to the area which had been considered for park by the District but was
not accepted due to the steep slopes. He indicated that although the District does not wish
to take ownership of that portion of property, the developer will commit to landscaping and
upgrading the trail network and that portion of the site will remain green space.
There being no further comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
Having given all those persons whose interests were deemed affected by the matters
contained herein a chance to be heard, the Mayor terminate the Public Hearing at
9:09p.m. ~
Certified Correct
/C (_____C?
R. mach,Acting Corporate Officer