Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2007-07-09 - Committee of the Whole - Agenda and Reports.pdf
District of Maple Ridge COMMI1TEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA July 9, 2007 1:00 P.M. Council Chamber Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review and debate of issues. No voting takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more information or clarification. Note: If required, there will be a 15-minute break at 3:00 p.m. Chair: Acting Mayor DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SER VICES Note: Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications may be permitted to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes. Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda: 1101 RZ/066/05, 23929 and 23943 130 Avenue, RS-2 to RS-lb and RI-i Staff report dated June 29, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6492-2007 to permit a subdivision of 11 lots be given first reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. Committee of the Whole Agenda July 9, 2007 Page 2 of 4 1102 DP/056/06, 24180 and 24208 102 Avenue Staff report dated June 29, 2007 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/056/06 in support of a 24 lot subdivision. 1103 Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Staff report dated June 25, 2007 providing information on the annual Drinking Water Quality Report. 1104 2007 TransLink MRN Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Agreement Staff report dated June 29, 2007 recommending that the Mayor and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and execute Major Road Network Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Agreement No. 200741. 1105 Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 120/07, 245 Street and McClure Drive Staff report dated June 29, 2007 recommending that Latecomer Charges be imposed and that the Mayor and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Latecomer Agreement LC 120/07. 1106 Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 121/07, 124 Avenue and Cherry Place Staff report dated June 29, 2007 recommending that Latecomer Charges be imposed and that the Mayor and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Latecomer Agreement LC 121/07. 1107 Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 122/07, 228 Street and 122 Avenue Staff report dated June 29, 2007 recommending that Latecomer Charges be imposed and that the Mayor and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Latecomer Agreement LC 122/07. Committee of the Whole Agenda July 9, 2007 Page 3 of 4 FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERVICES (including Fire and Police) 1131 Disbursements for month ended May 31, 2007 Staff report dated June 29, 2007 recommending that the disbursements for May 31, 2007 be approved. 1132 New Websfte Policy, Community Directory and Events Calendar Postings Staff report dated June 8, 2007 proposing new guidelines for postings to the District website for community directory listings and public events. 1133 Community Wildfire Protection Plan Staff report dated June 27, 2007 recommending that the Community Wildfire Protection Plan be adopted in principle and that staff be directed to apply to the Union of British Columbia Municipalities for grant funding to develop an implementation plan. Note: The Community Wildfire Protection Plan will be available to the public for viewing at Municipal Hall as well as being posted on the District's website. 1134 Economic Advisory Commission Bylaw Amendment Staff report dated July 4, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Economic Advisory Commission Amending Bylaw No. 6491-2007 to change the composition of members be given three readings. COMMUNI7YDEVELOPMENTAND RECREATION SERVICES 1151 Fraser Valley Regional Library 2008 Budget Staff report dated June 19, 2007 recommending that the 2008 Fraser Valley Regional Library Budget be endorsed. 1152 Local Area Service Petition for Provision of a Municipal Service, Maple Crest Subdivision Staff report dated July 4, 2007 recommending that Maple Crest Enhanced Landscape Maintenance Bylaw No. 6493-2007 for the provision of local area service to maintain enhanced landscaped areas be given three readings Committee of the Whole Agenda July 9, 2007 Page 4 of 4 1153 Report on Prison Work Crews Staff report dated July 3, 2007 providing information on the benefits of prison work crews participating in a work program. CORRESPONDENCE 1171 OTHER ISSUES 1181 ADJOURNMENT COMMUN!1Y FORUM COMMUNITY FORUM The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to speak with Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). The total time for this Forum is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a response will be given. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. If a member of the public has a concern related to a Municipal staff member, it should be brought to the attention of the Mayor and/or Chief Administrative Officer in a private meeting. Other opportunities to address Council may be available through the office of the Manager of Legislative Services who can be contacted at 463-5221 or by e-mail at cmarlo@marleridge.ca . Checked by ZA,1 Date: MAPLE British Columbia DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 29, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/066/05 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer AUN: CofW SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6492-2007 23929 and 23943 130 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-i.b (One Family Urban Residential- Medium Density) and RT-1 (Two Family Residential or Duplex), to permit a subdivision of 11 lots. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan designation of conservation and Residential (low density) and would have a dedicated portion of the lot as "Park". RECOMMENDATIONS: That Bylaw No. 6492-2007 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. I) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; A summary of the geotechnical report which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; Road dedication as required; Park dedication as required; Consolidation of the development site; Removal of the existing building/s; A Restrictive Covenant for the Duplex design including the requirement to achieve safe visibility must be registered at the Land Title Office; A landscape plan prepared by a Landscape Architect for the riparian area must be submitted including the security to do the works for the re-vegetation and enhancement works proposed. 1101 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Beesley Engineering Ltd Ronald Beesley Owner: B & M Logging Ltd Legal Description: Lot: 23, Block: 11, Section: 28, Township: 12, Plan: 11147 Lot: 23, Block: 11, Section: 28, Township: 12, Plan: 11147 OCP: Existing: RLow (Residential Low Density Urban) and Conservation Proposed: Residential and Conservation Zoning: Existing: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Proposed: RS-lb (One Family Urban Residential-Medium Density) Residential) and RT-1 (Two Family Residential or Duplex) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Vacant RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) and RS-lb (One Family Urban Residential-Medium Density) Conservation, Rlow (Residential low density Urban), Open Space Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Conservation and RLow (Residential low density Urban) Vacant & Single Family Dwellings RS-lb (One Family Urban Residential-Medium Density) Riow (Residential Low Density Urban), NPark Single Family Dwellings and Conservation RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) RLow and Conservation Single Family Dwelling and Conservation 11 Lots (10 Single Family Lots plus one Duplex Lot.) 1.594 HA (15939.99 m2) 130th Avenue and 239B Street to be provided through rezoning servicing agreement SD/066/05 -2- b) Project Description: The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject properties at 23929 and 23943 130th Avenue from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-lb (One Family Urban Residential (Medium Density) and RT-1 (Two Family Residential or Duplex) which will permit 10 single family lots and one Duplex lot. A design for the proposed duplex on the corner lot has been submitted along with the proposed lot geometry hence the rezoned property will have a dual zone on it (Appendix C). The subject site is comprised of two lots at the corner of 130th avenue and 239B Street in the Silver valley area, totaling an area of 1.594 HA (15939.99 m2) The western strip (extending from north to south) around the North Millionaire Creek which forms the Creek setback area plus additional park area (on the north near lot 11 and behind lots 5 to 9) will be dedicated as park to comply with the 68 % conservation designation on lot 23929. There will also be re-vegetation and enhancement work done around the creek and a bonding secured by the District to make sure it is implemented. C) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The proposed development complies with the 2006 Official Community Plan as all the area within the watercourse setback and beyond will be dedicated as park (Appendix C). The OCP designation for lot 23929 is a combination of conservation and low density urban, out of which 68 % of the area will be dedicated as Park". The adjoining lot is designated low density urban. Zoning Bylaw: The proposed ten RS-lb (One Family Urban Residential- Medium Density) lots range in area from 557 m2 to 883 m2 and comply with the width and depth required in the proposed zone. The corner lot proposed as RT-1 (Two Family Residential or Duplex) is 909.7 m2 which is more than the required 891 m2 area for a Duplex lot. Creek Setback Requirements: A 30 m setback from the top of the bank, established by a registered surveyor has been recommended as per the discussions that took place at the ERC (Environmental Review Committee) and agreed upon. The applicant's environmental planner and the District's environmental planner have agreed upon the safe creek setback and arrived at a consensus for all the proposed enhancement works involved. Development Permits: The proposed rezoning and subdivision does not require a Development Permit as it is for Single Family and Duplex use only. -3- Advisory Design Panel: The proposed project does not have to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel as it does not require a Development Permit. DeveloDment Information MeetinE: This proposal does not require a Development Information Meeting as it is a development for 11 lots and it is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering DeDartment: The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments: • Road dedication along 130th Avenue and 239B Street from the existing sidewalk (as per lot layout, Appendix C) • 130tn Avenue Urban road extension with curb and gutter and sidewalk required to west property line. • Part of 130th Avenue and 239A Street to be upgraded to urban road standard consistent with the Silver Valley Area Plan. • Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) required for storm detention facilities on-site similar to concept developed for adjacent subdivision. Adequate drainage for road extension on 130th Avenue will be required. • Part of 130th Avenue and 239 A Street requires street lighting with ornamental Street lights in support of subdivision of adjacent property. Curb, gutter, sidewalks and ornamental street lights required to be provided to the west property line. • Applicant needs to clarify and give a summary of Geotechnical issues that ensure suitability of the proposal on site, which will be a condition of the PLA at the subdivision stage. • A preliminary cost estimate will be determined and security obtained after the servicing drawings & design will be received from the applicant's professional engineer of record. • The house to be re-located will be required to comply with the 2006 BC code. Fire DeDartment: The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments: • Fire department has concerns with addressing of a Duplex on a curved road. The two units of the Duplex have two separate driveways fronting on to 130th Avenue and 239B Street. If they could have one physical address, with separate unit numbers it is easier to reach during a fire or emergency situation. • Further safety issues include the fact that this building fronts a steeply sloped road which produces blind spots for driveways. -4- Intergovernmental Issues: The applicant will be required to get an approval from the DFO as a condition of final reading. The Storm Water Management Plan will address DFO's Urban Storm Water Guidelines and BMPs for protection of fish and fish habitat. Environmental Implications: A Water Course Development Permit is not required here because a lot of the issues have been resolved with respect to required setbacks and Creek enhancement works, between the applicant's environmental planner and the District's environmental planner. A bonding of the estimated cost of these works will be secured by the District to ensure implementation. CONCLUSION: The project proposes adequate restoration and enhancement works around the North Millionaire Creek and fits well in the context of other development in this neighborhood. The Storm Water Management Plan and a Traffic Study have been submitted to address the Engineering and Fire concerns. The 130th Avenue and 239A Street corner lot visibility and safety issues as well as the Duplex design issues will be covered by a restrictive design covenant to ensure implementation. Therefore it is recommended that this application proceed to Council for the First Reading and Public Hearing subject to conditions noted above. Prepared b)r Rasika Acharya \ Plan1\Il P - k'edQrf Plan /C- Approved b/ Frank Quinn, MBA, P.En / GM(blic WøfR & D vel ment Services Concurrence: J. L. (Ji#1) Rule Chief administrative Officer The following appencces are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B- Bylaw No. 6492-2007 Appendix C- Lot layout & Architectural drawings Appendix D- Landscape drawings -5- C- IQ Fir CO IQ (0 U) HC) >Io - C.'.) 01 z - •0 03 - 23970 C_S 23992 CO I', C z1 23788 C. C 23830 23831 23840 23943 i- 1 L__1 23861 23850 > 23865 / C_S 3879 23 \ - (P7417) 23890 3905 r -o - 0 C.) CO 0 0 23926 Distri nf Missinn 23930 -o E 1/2 2 23929 d CO 0 A'T'EMbx B DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6492-2007 A Bylaw to amend Map "A forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6492-2007." Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 14963), Lot 23, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 11147 and Lot 23, Except: Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 14963); Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 11147 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1399 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) and RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) (shown hatched) Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of ,A.D.200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER Rem 23 bo hc. / 1.189 ho V I CD CN 0ro. i- CN UA 0 In BCP 7889 0 PARK 1UO 0.920 ho f 28 0 13701 73098 29 8 _ 73088 73091 7 13078 13081 31 6 0hc. 13068 13071 '0 1941 BC QO 22 Nt 23 0.40 h 0/ 1 0 I o. 130 A AVE. ,;APLE RDCE ZONE AMENDNC bylaw No. 6492-2007 Mop No. 1399 rom: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) PS—i b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) and PT—i (Two Family Urban Residential) - shown hatched 4' A 1:1500 zn~ 130th AVENUE LOT 23: 2392* IM AVE. WPtE 6111CC S.C. P40221 W: 23943 730 AVE. M( moot. 6.0. Cr04. 6(PT00' I: LOT 23 EXCEpT: P400CC C (DPUIATORY PUN *4963) StEnO 20 T000NOP 10 979 0tS11dI0SltR 911,05917 PUN 11147 2. PLOCCI. •C )l,N4AlOWv PULl 14863) 5OCT04 26 10591991 12 9(0 0(SIILINSI(T 3570911 PIfli 11147 011402S1011S NSF 0(074(0 191044 PUll 1)4117340 £IEOATCTTS MC 0(074110 PROW 0(44 64740067 CttVflh101O - 31.709 )NING REQUIREMENTS 65-lb 07_I $57 •Q"" 895 04.91 22.00,, 27.00,fl 30.0091 1CC 40% LU.OPC 223.qn 8.04, 64r. 9.0091 6C60. 7.5091 1E. 3.59,,, 7t44411640 LOT STATISTICS 675011 590754 6727404740 OPOfl00C P..672640 (760.4000 WI 04(07011 4116(0. 7800,, 12.4911040 03405491 40% I9. 676(0. 12.50.21.23 337.5491 40% 0%CC. 670(0, 337957, 40% 56(0. T0. 0%C0. 266.54,, 40% 75.04, 3?.03 676(0. 3036(n 49% 75.34., 34.7S.,, 72,3047.70 286.0,, 40% 75.63.11 32.78,, 15.70.77.60 223.om 40% 15.8491 32.3091 12.10017.30 27.00,, 52.87,, 27.00,, 50(0. IINC FOR DUPLEX. I 0410104 I BEEsLrY ENOINEERINO LTD. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDCF 1 1 LOT SUODMSION OF LOT 23 CIVIL & S1RL)CIU0VC ENGINEERS I tNGINCCRIILG 0(P11011t01 130th AVENUE, MAPLE RIDGE. BC " LOT LAYOUT 07/03/W 101 blEnT 6(115(0 , I)IM 130th AVENUE 9470 41 (9100: bOO.I.p07.l,,..,.l " 2398 S7RET ~—O 4.101 -U t, 41.14 4t Ir 7\ \QNIT 47.4 y 7 \ •: ... 7 47.0 473m I5&S$ ('S C, I'll. — b PROPOSED BUILDING 14562dTh1 [LEV. 46.1 U. 151.25 FT. W1I FLOOR E1.EV. 4912 U. 101.16 FT. UPPER fl.00R CtV. 52.14 U. 171.07 FT. U/S TRUSS flEV. 54.0 U. 179.13 FT. ROOF NOX ELEV. 57.10 U. 107.54 FT. C4RE IRIT A ELEV. 49.5 U. 159.12 FT. CMGE UNIT B flEV. 46.1 U. 151.25 FT. SHOWING LOCATION OF PROPOSED RESIDENCE AT: LION. LOF I 3. SOCnON 26, TowN4P 12. N.W.D. PUN 11147 avic 2390 STRUT, *30th A'ENU WPIZ RIDOT. B.C. LOT MSA 9.7 SOW. 9762.25 SOFT. ZONING: SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/81$ 10" 130th AVENUE / : I C- PROJECT: LOT 13, PLAN NUMBER: RUSBOURNE DEIG'T LTD i/S -o DRAWN:EF • MAPLE RIDGE, B.C. SCALE: 101-22590 DEWDN!Y TRUNK ROAD, MAPLE RWGE. BC, V2X 324: SHEET TITLE: DATE MAY 23, 2007 CHECKED: B TEL: (604) 476I247 FAX: (604) 476-1249 PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS SHEET NO.: HTTP:/w.rnburndsigi,.coi, '3 • ill i-.•• lu .4 •_JI - Q •)A. 0 A. .I I c Q - (44 (I) __ IL ...n'. •" - A .- EXPOOM 066SOSAT .,-, .<. •.' •STAFS - -T--- .21 511,1 PitS / APP?iUc. LOT 4 (undeveloped) 41.14 [kIL 3lSO.F • 7. _____ - III -i *06 0tGG1T4! P05 POST 0*4. I I rxeS - I III *10 I IIIIHIIHIRi 2'KVPM. I I III 111111 !H11i1 I lii - _____ P51110. SK.24 dnP pW,Vum AT 121?V -t I *21 0P061W A$11. Pesu. i pae.ota S to *0 POK4.0 P50_S to to -.-. ____ ______ 41d. *405.06 etM. to to 40 0th *ood *21,651 *0 *0 2 WAG 40 2110 GoIa - *o06tod 40 , 4*5* *0 be hot-dloped s*0d. b Pn21I*p**. HOW Y FENCIM flOt to eGaIC / ii 1' 9 c14ri!GTt$S&1. FLANS FOOt rTf 6AADN& 4 flULDIN6 eLLVATIOHS LfrOQSC.*Ph& II IIT Y05D / - 'r TO L'I 65a214 V05ET SI O5O TO AV KATI4Ø SIT! LJ (46 P OSA?P S1IY I A11O'5) / PLANT LI5T SOT0040. 0440! 0O4.l NM.! $ / IPOC40 Twim I Me fltn. 504140 50441*06W Sc., Cd. .o Com. 94dm 11*54 r06d01 044415 VOlt. 00,40 005004 5*1, Cd St O I 40S k. KS. *25016 5*a ca. - SOS It. 402*0*0*1* 2 PICa 0,01k. Sable 190*0. 5,5, It. St 2 $195412.40 102115515 Ira 9 Cat. 1 012421 Ja19. 4511,5.0*04514 MaIns. 03 Cal. () S 21 mkroØ?a loWe 0s0 0165. KS 5,24004 9 Cat. OPeC, I C0,5S 500*0000* 5155140 DG5aOd 59 C.K. PROJECI $ 5*11501116 nM.pat 0*5? II04pOrt 0115*01114*06 .2 cat PROPOSM says. a_a -.ca' caen40 50914 &am .3 cad. DUPLEX AD 4 1,6,406 400aM. 10, 01.oWt IIO2o0, 5.50 •2 Cat Al.19345 p.,. a .o.o,. ,t.o p.,. .2 cat (3 • P00.556 InJtICa.. VIlla. S., Villa.. Sa, P00.0111. .3 Cost. 0 Id mao = '01±0 L.la' Sc 14*011415214 3 VOnO, 40.141 0,40011911*01 53 Cat.0 04 52 Cat 121 MC0011,. $04211 V.0. .664. V51an .04* Kfl4CkS4ck •I Cat, lOOt 93 0119.11.024 19.t.c.d 00*4. 0*0. Pete 14*155 II Cat, 34.00 - 22 Sa*zeIs**lSIa ISO IS 4165005,0_Ma .p.*.. Ito Ca 50.0 01 Cat, 2804 • 16 P40104 5*0 P211*1* 'lOad, ROSY OAFO€ ta.4 0,4 .014.051.440*21 • 21 L.l55U 1*51009040 $0211240 04009045,44800.54.r II Cat t**I01C41* 5 • 4 tIC1. 45,515 5*54 Pen II Cot. 21*05 10 0400*50 10114 14*51 5,,OSe IIS5,LM4fll$050 11*0*: anIn.Po.lo4an2.o&, *5? PS oS .15I* *3510001*0*4* o I I._N!9C.AP PLA.N L-lon o*m -I MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Watercourse Development Permit 24180 and 24208 102 Avenue DATE: June 29, 2007 FILE NO: DP/056/06 AUN: CofW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Watercourse Development Permit application has been made for subject property located at 24180 102 Avenue and 24208 102 Avenue. Mainstone Creek runs along the north portion of the subject property and Jackson Creek runs along the southeast corner of the subject property. The Watercourse Protection Development Permit Area was established for the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. This application is in support of the proposed 24 lot subdivision under SD/055/06. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/056/06 respecting property located at 24180 102 AVE & 24208 102 AVE. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd., Brian Wright Owner: Jurgen Meier, Sigrid Meier; William R Archibald, Patricia M Archibald Legal Description: Lot: 30 and 31, Sec. 3, Tp: 12, Plan: 39561 OCP: Existing: Medium Density Residential & Conservation Zoning: Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Residential Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) & C-5 (Village Centre Commercial) Designation Medium Density Residential & Village Commercial 1102 South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Residential R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) & RS-3 (One Family Residential) Medium Density Residential & Conservation Residential R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Medium Density Residential & Conservation Residential R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) & RS-3 (One Family Residential) Medium Density Residential & Conservation Residential Residential 1.86 ha 102nd Avenue and Hill Avenue To be provided through a Rezoning Servicing Agreement and Subdivision SD/RZ/055/06 Project Description: Currently, the development site fronts 102 Avenue and is in the Albion Area and consists of two separate parcels of land which has a combined total area of 1.86 ha. Mainstone Creek is located on the north portion of the subject property and Jackson Creek is located on the southeast corner of the subject property. Therefore, Council's approval of a Watercourse Protection Development Permit is required prior to subdivision taking place. The habitat protection area for these watercourses have been dedicated as Park as part of rezoning application RZ/055/06, which was granted final reading on June 26, 2007. Road dedication on 102 Avenue was required as part of the rezoning. Therefore, to protect Mainstone Creek, it was recommended that the creek be shifted away from the road right-of-way and that enhancement works be done in and around the creek (Schedule C). This application is in support of subdivision application SD/055/06. The proposed subdivision is for 24 R-3 lots. Planning Analysis: Watercourse Protection DeveloDment Permit: The Watercourse Protection Development Permit Area was established for the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. The guidelines are as follows: -2- A. Watercourse Protection Area Establishment: Watercourse protection areas are to be established in accordance with their habitat value and the potential impacts proposed by adjacent development. The District of Maple Ridge, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks must endorse the proposed watercourse protection boundaries. A minimum setback of 15 metres from the top of bank of Mainstone Creek and Jackson Creek has been established and is consistent with the District's watercourse setback mapping. The watercourse protection areas are to be dedicated where possible into public ownership for conservation purposes. The watercourse protection areas have been dedicated as a requirement of rezoning application RZ/055/06. The boundaries of the watercourse protection areas are to be physically located on the ground by a B.C. Land Surveyor prior to site disturbance. A BCLS has located the watercourse protection area on the ground and plans have been registered with the Land Titles Office. Temporary barrier fencing is to be installed adjacent to watercourse protection areas prior to any construction activity and should be replaced with permanent post and rail fence upon development completion. A temporary barrier fence will be installed adjacent to the watercourse protection area as part of this Development Approval process. This will be replaced with a permanent post and rail fence upon completion of the development. All lots must provide the required minimum lot dimensions as set out in the Zoning Bylaw exclusive of the watercourse protection boundaries. All lots meet the required minimum lot dimensions as noted. B. Erosion Control: 6. All work is to be undertaken and completed in such a manner as to prevent the release of sediment to any ravine, watercourse or storm sewer. An erosion and sediment control plan that involves implementation prior to land clearing and site preparation and the careful timing of construction is to be provided in accordance with the requirements of the District's Watercourse Protection Bylaw 6410-2006. The developer/applicant's Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is in accordance with the requirements of the Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection Bylaw No. 6410-2006. The -3- Siltation Control Plan and Storm Water Control Plan by McElhanney Consultant Services Ltd. has been attached as Schedule D. In support of watercourse protection, a signed letter from the engineer of record has been submitted with assurances that the stormwater management plan for the site will meet the DFO Urban Storm water standards for water velocity, volume, and water quality. Silt fencing should be erected to prevent the movement of silt into the watercourse protection area prior to any disturbance to the soil on the site. This is a requirement of the Watercourse Protection Bylaw and a Watercourse Protection Development Permit site plan has been submitted demonstrating compliance with these requirements. Cutting and filling adjacent to watercourse protection areas is to be kept to a minimum incorporating appropriate structural fill material and blending graded areas with natural slope, as supported by the Hillside Policies of the OCP A grading plan has been prepared and submitted to the District in support of the development. The timing of the cutting and filling is confined to the Fisheries window and outside critical bird nesting periods. The District may require environmental impact studies enhancement works, and monitoring in support of development proposed to be located within a Watercourse Protection Area. Supporting documentation, technical studies, and recommendations with respect to impacts of studies , and recommendations with respect to impacts of the proposed development may include the following: A geotechnical slope stability and erosion control report; A flood protection report; A groundwater impact assessment report; Wildlife habitat assessment report; Vegetation impact assessment report; and A detailed trail plan. In support of the above, the following reports were required and have been received; A geotechnical and erosion control report, An Environmental assessment which includes Wildlife and Vegetation assessment, Storm water management plan & erosion sediment control plan -4- C. Vegetation Management: Natural vegetation is to be retained wherever possible to ensure minimal disruption to the environment and to protect against slope failure. Land clearing adjacent to the watercourse protection areas is to be restricted to a phased construction schedule. • The conservation area has been protected through Park dedication. A fence will be installed along the property line to define the clearing limitations. • An Arborist report with recommendations for retention of significant trees has been submitted for the Watercourse Protection Development Permit Area. Habitat restoration landscaping of all bare or sparse riparian areas within the watercourse protection area may be required. Vegetation species should be native of the area and be selected for erosion control and fish and wildlife habitat values. • A significant amount of vegetation will be protected within the watercourse protection area which is dedicated as park. • A enhancement plans for watercourse improvement adjacent to Mainstone Creek and Jackson Creek has been prepared by C. Kavolinas & Associates Inc. dated June 2007 under drawing number L-14 (Appendix 0). Security to do the works in the amount of $6451.00 is required. Stormwater outflows to the stream or leave area should have water quality and erosion control features so as to minimize their impacts on fish habitat and in compliance with the Districts stormwater management plans. • A letter of confirmation from the engineer of record has been received stating that his storm water management plan meets DFO storm water management standards for volume, velocity, and water quality as required by the Watercourse Protection Bylaw. D. Monitoring: 13. The implementation of required environmental mitigative measures as designed and their maintenance is to be monitored by a qualified environmental monitor. • Triton Environmental Consultants Ltd. will be the environmental monitors for the project and will ensure performance meets with the standards established by the Watercourse Protection Bylaw. A record of all monitoring data shall be made available to the District upon request. • The Environmental Monitor has been provided with written authority to modify and/or halt any construction activity necessary to ensure compliance with Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection Bylaw No. 6410-2006. -5- The erosion and sediment control works approved by the engineer of record and the environmental monitor, shall be inspected, maintained and operated by the property owner and/or contractor performing the construction work set out in the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan until a Certificate of Acceptance has been issued by Director of Development Engineering or an Occupancy Permit has been issued by the Building Department. Intergovernmental Issues: Department of Fisheries and Oceans Road dedication was required along 102 Avenue as part of the rezoning application. Therefore, it was recommended that Mainstone Creek was shifted away from the road. As a result, the proposed development is likely to result in HADD (harmful alteration, disruption, or destruction of fish habitat) the Department of Fisheries and Oceans was notified of the proposal. At the Environmental Review Committee Meeting with DFO on November 22, 2006, the following recommendations were made. • Improvements to the in-channel and riparian habitat of Mainstone Creek • Invasive removal and replanting restoration on Jackson Creek • In-stream habitat complexing and the removal of the culverts (it is noted that Mainstone Creek does not support fish in this section at this time) • Riparian revegetation and enhancement works for Mainstone Creek • Application for Notification to the Ministry of Environment for Section 9 - Changes In and About a Stream • A stormwater management plan and assurances from the engineer of record that the plan meets DFO's stormwater management guidelines for water quality, quantity, and velocity. A formal application to the DFO had been made to address the above requirements. The applicants have submitted the required information to the DFO, which addresses the above recommendations. Therefore, staff is satisfied that the applicant has met DFO's requirements. Citizen/Customer Implications: Until Council has authorized a development permit, the applicant will be unable to begin site preparation for subdivision SD/055/06. Financial Implications: Performance Security: In support of the restoration works required in or around Anderson Creek the amount of security that will be required is $6451.00. Performance security for site development will be achieved through provisions of the Watercourse Protection Bylaw. well CONCLUSION: Staff has reviewed the guidelines established for the Watercourse Protection Development Permit Area Guidelines and feel that these have been satisfied by the applicant. Prepar&d by frdii6a Leung PIrwjgT c nician \ 2 Appjovdby: afiei in , P,MCIP ector of Planning ~'w X4~ - - Approved by: 29m"nk Quinn, MBA, P.E9g : Public Works &øv&pmentSeMces Concurrence: ,1 L. (Jim) RIe / Chief Administrative Officer AL/d p The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A: Subject Map Appendix B: Subdivision Layout Plan Appendix C: Creek Relocation Plan Appendix D: Siltation Control Plan and Storm Water Control Plan Appendix E: Landscape Plan, Riparian Planting, Stream Restoration -7- 49pc/ix 14 - 1111111 ;Te C, to 2rfl 213 !I! LI I3130987 I 1 21314 Iggp45 516 7 81 i [1-4 J1-MJL3A95i.. I EM. 5 District of Pitt Meadows. 24180 & 24208 102 AVENUE CORPORATION OF In eke THE DISTRICT OF N of D Ajion Langley MAPListrict E RIDGE IN'.[ APLE RIEXE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,500 DATE: Jun 13, 2006 FILE: DP1056106 BY: PC 241A ST. c r P1 ii I I I I I I I I I I UJO9L II I I I I I I I I I 21b - I 29 0 I L 11,6,5 1219712710 1119 219 2.79 I I 24 1 \ o Is.) • 572.1A 3 l 2e lz 2922 18 19 20 21 r~T17 P1 MJL22 ih 9 12.19 12.19 31c1;c\ rn 6 F119 4 462ia • 5 200 79.14 2.07 207 207 1207 22.91 16 V5 14: 13 1 12 _iz P Pai fl F422 0 1 7 500"" I 1 I1219 8' Tt III Lapkr mrruii 1j 5p. I2,n wide 24X)n deep 1,td Area ep (459 ac) P&aea MprOL 5,52954A, ( 19,OZ) Iiwrnr*d 9mm reae4 Mrun 4tRtne 8m z 12w tbs: frat 5.m, Fzw qad8,ii, 5JI.err51k4wd.Qn ht McIEIhanny T-n McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. 1 3160-88TH,..AVENUE PHONE(604)596.039 I SUPREY,e.C. FAX(604)59.8853 - PREUMINARY LAYOUT ONLY, SUBJECT TO M'PROVAL - AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO DETAILED SURVEY AND CALCULATiON. AND MAY VARY. - NOT TO BE USED FOR LECAL TRANSACTIONS. Sketch! JJqI 06 e&4Aa,2 06 Scale: 1:1000 Dote: July 2006 Job No.: 2111-02389 (an., nMswt ow n.? Pin ASL PifliL ow MO n.m 01 WA owi tWAlut ow Was Mm Wi WA MOM n.M Wa n.M AS ID K MAD ffiflD MOJO WatAS! AS AS - AS K M.AW IOTI1 AS WAiTh Ii VPWimITt IC1Th AS AS.AtL MASASASI 0 IMOta AS WAtt watrm, 0 MOUSY 0 ala " IS. OMO.oI4 WAit Lila MAMAS To MAlt WAOL K IT (D 0)011 0) ______ IREF-0 TR((-D Rtt-D TRC[-D IREF-D IR[F-0 IR(E-D REF-0 TR // /// / /, V 7///////// 7/ UOUT CHERRY I Will SWilMAS wo - (OAR TRill-c DOO lATE-il 55) I -. __- TREE C [oo. C:) _____ 000 Co ' [ IR C TREE C C 1) CDAR W. 1 2 °i \3 ®4 7 8 Em M Mi Wi AS K • d ~'fILAR --n _ Ii I $M - MMMI WIN OniI - OMPIS owl B TofutMis LECO4D A WWAS( TI IWAU AITOM A SEC11ON A-A vi oown.,mt •..;• • : ••V.. * S-n.'Mmm'au _________ :.-•--- I SOS L0)MmlMI ASMMNM/WITLMON •••. _________ TT1'ICAL ROCX CHECXDAM IN LOW FLOW CHANNEL • ;.I:: IDMi.-MM.MWJASNWAWM ons SEC1ON 8-8 SW M 5000)05 5 JO 0) 5)55 Mm L DCXMFMN McElhann.y ,MiI I T55I,T, I(0B-oI5-i05t CREEK RELOCATiON PLAN Z 12 MIt KIn. (0)050! SMuMO. WAAAhIC MASt AIM Si CE 4AM I3IM3I *0). $507. D.C. V35 303 0)0)50)0 ASinMOOMO 1(1 IDMI - -- Mow 'TD 1.8I1* 00 — 00814010* 004(1011 - !JJ *1- 00000000 lATH 0010 Tft4 04(10106 0 00010000 *00 0*50 (*00H n — 000111550*1 (II 0041101* ('0$_I. 0fl ('S '0 lOS 00*106 fl0)i flit 10CThI B-I u. lOWS 'S 0)110 0 0 (0 —s4,t__ 0*050% 80118% TD*P, ATPWLT CATCH B$S8 SD80CHT 1RP 0 *0500100(0*00001 'oTT) fInER FT (In PP*ERENT) OIL U 00*500 10000*100(0 Pjt III noTiOn 0*1000 1101 I OUS!00 Iii It., 100* 0007 10*1 .0.01*0(1* C/I 501 00(1 £0 55, 1000 31st.) ,> • (8011*1100.0000 i-i00* 1065 SIIL1It 1010 - 011(0 0)86 II .t iL-i tAT fr4 'C RITa 100 04001 0 10110011 06*. 01,1810000 04110801 Incus n1a- 10014 INCa INC - U 10000 0 11)18 0(140* U £001140 0(110 I- 1001041) J cJ - • 100 TOUCH flhltR FAWC FtNcE tT0B 0*001 0*041 0(4 00100(0 W rITCA/s0*E PiLL<2A AT CRC 2 00.5 0 10 160t• SCCTMI A-A 00* MIS 003111400 TSWAL ROCK (Itac I6* 07.1. ff\ • II 00*1150) 1311— / AHAY MC Mi Mn DUAL *011110 0*5 • - 0010091400. MM ---------- - j 24 To NN;J1iLi - - 0I t !O n. 100 N *15*065000*010(1 N (CI 00001000 ITT 00*006 40*0*0 10065 I 040(1 II (400 coo. . Li B'SJ1 001$ 00 LJ Tc (06110(708 TO 1.010% 113(1 IN 1*104 0(00100.,.! IWfl. 10*11 0070 00001 0,067 0*10? 8*00*0600 T0S1 005*01(50011*0(110 00 0( RI (00*90060 SIt,. Salow. IIWS 0 0 00(031 06 *5-0(001061 [SlIt tIN (IC 0 TIE 04111(0*10 0006 10 4010 ICON. rails rut W. 0*, Mi MOP MpL Al SEDIMENT CONTROL DURING SITE 9IY° CONSTRUCTION BY DEVELOPER'S CONTRACTOR Kit LM McEIhenn.y $ I T 001100 I2) 01*3000 McElhanney ConsultIng Exam ServIces Ltd. L(*PP50*..CI069* 350 *o,*06 13160-86 A..., S.,o60. BC. 0(31031 _______________ 0006000 US 10*411 04 £1050110, 48 06* Cd 0*06 006 110 flI4)%00-o.0100 oo4004N19*-* PLNA ITHP. Mlff P AT EH CATCH BAMO 0.03, US I 010*0000*50000* *5 05* 0001? 0*S tL 00010610*0.010100804*001000(1*000000550.1004 LOUS14 0 41_TO 06010TOOTI 10*80006000006*00 *000)000)0004000004 06101 as flU 0110000115010606101 00OIICMI0( (00001 SIlT SIlO 04010.000(04 00. 011.04 0* 00* US 00001011*00 SO 5100(10*51)0000 101110010101£ 51)060*0(068003-00011101*00*00000 80111011001000511)00060000*00*10050*006000*1*0111 07*111(0(01041*0100150*000066000604 001(10006 01*01 1*11800*00100000104000061000101* 0. SI 51)400600 USO 1*1110* 8*0*01900000600 6000-100(100 0674000(005000011001010101010) US 100406060 1000*10*14(0 011*0009) 00271 1 (1 51000101*0000*000000010 1000(411010800 OUST 500000 III (00000TO060010.*I( 1011* 001000* *00115010111*000 060*0*05* 301(6100 0184 0000 00 00! 104* 8. 0*10)8.0*0000* 5101 151000045110406 000 0*1110)100 (*0080000.010064 * SY(*0000000I06 - 5? US1 *061(0*0301010006000*00-10010)8100*001)004008 010500000106(411*010*0*111100001 *0000W 30004110 (*5*10 0401*01 III 010 000 001*0*00011,0.Sfl 0.040 010510 01061*10408010*10*11. (1-2*T I0.8000 400*10010(1? 0* 10(1000(0000001001 *001 1001000*01 100*10111 00000 0(100*06404* 100000*15011004100800*0 060000,10* lI-fill. 0005*8 l*IP(00S-0*Ol( 00 001101(4401050000100-000 00710 *0*0*0 004800800*01110700000100 006 CftO 0100 *00-000(811 00* 0010.06* 0(011100 0611 a In USOl USICI 500,fl PS *4060111000(00406 lC*fl1 II 01011*10I(fl P.0*11140 0040 0000100 010 0051ClSfl0600l*0t 04 01(500601 0? 00(1 100*151 0101 1*00 0(0 5 00)0* 10111010* p000701 WI0V100 (*00 0(00000/0(11011*0(0 16104(0*1 040 040,001 • 41*0000880000 *80*ITS*000_T III 11M COIW* 00000* 40106019)10114* in 00100 010I)00t000010 41 10% P015 o 01(8011000*0000*011000*00*000010010000(0 P... • 01 01*11010* 10)1*0000110001, US 80004* - 0*01050. • 0*18010.06*06060*4*0(0700(1 0*1 000*C?MM*0N.I511 06 50100*10 I - 1 1 7114-0300-0 .l 12 SILTATION CONTROL PLAN 102 AVENUE & 242 STREET *0(4401000 01 701 0600 00 5*0 1111!? ' 4 urw!rIrrI9rr !IILLIJ UZILLLll IIIIlhiIIhIU IIMiIIIJJJI IIUPIEEIELU IIlJEE[LI iIUIEIIJ11 IIULIJI IIiILLL L : • 1]]LLL IIllIMlJLLL IIILLLLI9 IIIULLIJ IIILII]] IIIIJiiLLL IHIdIihI IIICIJLLL IllLSIELL IIà2I9JELI9 IImEI::ccI SIR Appndi 0 f Iitit $iUIUNINIl. mcculam I !tZ_,__.,___.\_J -_---\ • _ _ _ -- _ 1 IiA' L i j IVIH! I \\,AM MI -155 01111111! ild it, ~ LL - MW \F 2 z o 0 zji I r. I . b — — jg F No I7J2,])rnin WA] IN w. -. -- - .--...-- fl fl.. \ i•P N i,2'Vg . .. 2]) )U ) - - - -- -- FIBRF ...- 3000 .— _-1 . ---.- --------.- H 70çDiL R CEDAR - .1L 6000 CEDAR ! PNT LIST I KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME Q1Y SIZE © GALTHERIA SHALLON SALAL 11 NO. 2 POT ]I © RUBUS PARVIFLORUS THIMBLEBERRY 29 NO. 2 POT TREE STOCK SHOULD RE A MINIMUM OF 1.2m (4) IN HEICNT WHEN P[D, AND OEMLERIA CERASIFORMIS DIIDIIC CDrTADIl IC INDIAN PLUM CAl &aMDrDDV 20 NO. 2 POT kI l\UUIJJ jr LlIrUILlJ JrLr,qurloLl\lAl LI CII). I Nil (9 SALIX STICHENS SITKA WILLOW 7 NO. 2 POT ]t CORNUS SERICEA RED OSIER DOGWOOD 23 NO. 2 POT SAMBUCUS RACEMOSA RED ELDERBERRY 32 NO. 2 POT • CRATAEGUS DOUCLASII BLACK HAWTHORN 5 NO. 2 POT ® ALNUS RUBRA RED ALDER 22 NO. 2 POT D THUJA PLICATA WESTERN RED CEDAR 17 NO. 5 POT ACER MACROPHYLLUM BROADLEAF MAPLE 15 NO. 5 POT ® TSUGA HETEROPHYILA WEStERN HEMLOCK is NO. 5 POT PlANTED 1.5m APART. STOCK SHOULD BE PLANTED IN SEPTEMBER OR EARLY OCTOBER 2005. All REED CAJILNEY CRASS IS TO BE CLEARED FROM PLANTED AREA BEFORE PLANTING. DISTURBED SOILS ARE TO BE RAND SEEDED WITH A SEED MIX COMPRISED Of 60% LEGUMES, AND 40% GRASSES. A SINGLE-NET STRAW BLANKET (BIODEGRADABLE) IS TO BE INSTAllED OVER PLANTING AREA AFTER REED CANARY CRASS HAS BEEN CLEARED, NURSERY STOCK ARE TO BE PLANTED THROUGH THE STRAW PLANKET. ALL PLANT1NG SHOULD BE BASED ON 1 TREE OR SHRUB PER 1m2 DENSITY, WHEN AVERAGED OVER THE WHOLE RIPARLAN AREA THE PLANTING CONTRACTOR IS TO PROBDE ONE (I) YEAR OF MNNTENANCE. PLANT MAINTENANCE IS TO INCLUDE WATERING, BRUSHING FOR REED CANARY GRASS, SELECTIVE PRUNING AND DEER-GUARDING IF NEEDED. PLANT SPECIES SURvIVAl. IS TO BE 100% AFTER ONE YEAR. THE SIJRvIVORSHIP MAY BE ACHIEVED THROUGH REPLANTING. .KAVOI INAc & ASSOCIAIUS MA MR PlAN VIEW LANDTCAPL PLAN RIPARIAN PLANTING STREAM RESTORATION H1. AI I Deep Roots Greater Heights DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 25, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: E03-012-001 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer AUN: CofW SUBJECT Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The District of Maple Ridge operates a water utility under permit by the Fraser Health Authority (FHA). The District's Operating Permit for the Municipal Waterworks System, requires that an annual report be prepared and submitted to the Fraser Health Authority and be available to the public. The report, as attached includes an outline of the regulatory framework and water quality monitoring data for 2006. A copy of the report will be placed in the public library and on the corporate website as part of the public information strategy. In 2006, the District purchased 12.4 million cubic meters of water from the Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD), (an increase of 3.07% from 2005). During the year, the Utility's water quality met microbiological standards and fell within the aesthetically desirable range of 6.8 to 7.2 pH units. RECOMMENDATION: THAT the staff report titled 'District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006' be received for information. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The District operates a water utility under the provisions of the Local Government Act (Provincial), and under permit by the Provincial Ministry of Health Services - Fraser Health Authority. Water quality requirements are stipulated by the Drinking Water Protection Regulations and administered by the FHA. The District, as a distributor and purveyor of water, is reliant on the GVWD for source water quality control. Treated water is delivered to the District by the GVWD via the Maple Ridge Main and 248 Street Reservoir. While Coquitlam Lake is the primary source of water delivered to Maple Ridge, the GVWD has the capability to transfer water from the Seymour and Capilano sources and maintain supply to Maple Ridge in the event of disruptions at Coquitlam Lake. 1103 The District's drinking water system operating permit requires an annual water quality monitoring program and that an annual report be prepared and submitted. While the monitoring program provides a representative picture of drinking water quality in the system and within municipal mains, it does not provide a definite picture of drinking water quality within buildings, where water quality can change significantly due to pipe materials, standing times, temperature, and other factors. It can be assumed that samples taken within buildings may be of different quality than those taken from sites on municipal mains. The District's water distribution infrastructure includes 361 km of watermain, over 18,000 connections, 6 pump stations, 8 reservoir sites, and 5 re-chlorination stations. Weekly samples from 16 locations in the distribution system that are analyzed by the GVWD and results are sent to the District Operations and Engineering departments and to the FHA. In addition, the FHA takes audit samples biweekly throughout the District and the GVWD takes samples from their system within Maple Ridge at one other location. There was a decrease in the number of samples having a heterotrophic plate count (HPC) of 500 CFU/ml or greater from 18 in 2005 to 7 in 2006. There were no samples testing positive for fecal coliform and no samples containing more than 10 total coliforms per lOOmL. b) Strategic Alignment: Financial Management Council has directed that the Municipality provide high quality municipal services to our citizens and customers in a cost effective and efficient manner and to identify methods to generate non-tax revenue. The annual water quality monitoring program is intended to ensure that the water delivered by the District's utility is of high quality. Smart Managed Growth The Corporate Strategic Plan directs that municipal infrastructure be protected and managed through the preparation of appropriate plans to ensure maintenance of the system. A systematic water quality monitoring plan assists in ensuring that an effective water distribution system is managed and maintained. Intergovernmental Relations/Partnerships: Council has directed that the District develop and maintain strong positive working relationships with the GVWD and other governmental agencies. Strong working relationships with the GVWD and FHA is required to ensure the quality of water. The annual program and report facilitates an effective relationship. C) Citizen/Customer Implications: Maple Ridge water utility customers expect that the investment in the network be maintained to provide safe, reliable and high quality water. The annual reporting of water quality is a means to meet the accountability that customers expect from a utility. Improvements by the GVRD will continue to improve regional water quality. Interdepartmental Implications: As part of the Public Works and Development Services Division, the Engineering and Operations departments collaborate in the water utility's planning, management, operation and maintenance to meet customer water quality objectives. Policy Implications: The operation of the water system is managed under the District's Business Planning process and meets the requirements of the FHA. CONCLUSIONS: Water quality in Maple Ridge was generally good in 2006 and in keeping with previous years. For 2006, the Utility's water quality met microbiological standards and aesthetically desirable alkalinity targets. Prepared by: MdreWWood, PhD., PEng. Municipal Engineer Approved by: fank Quinn, MBA, PEng. Gene) Man ;ubfic W Development Services Concurrence by:J,L(Jim)Rule ' Chief Administrative Officer AW/mi DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT 2006 Deep Roots Greater Heights DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT 2006 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................0 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 3 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................2 3.1 REGULATORY OUTLINE ................................................................................................ ........... 2 3.2 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ............................................................................................................. 2 3.3 WATER PUIRCHASED (TOTAL).................................................................................................3 3.4 WATER SOLD (METERED) ........................................................................................................3 4 DRINKING WATER QUALITY PROGRAM ..............................................................................4 4.1 FACILITY MAINTENANCE........................................................................................................4 4.2 RE-CHLORINATION STATIONS ...............................................................................................5 4.3 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING AND MONITORING ..............................................................5 4.4 BACTERIOLOGICAL MONITORING ........................................................................................6 4.5 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL MONITORING...........................................................................7 5 EMERGENCY RESPONSE .............................................................................................................9 5.1 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................9 5.2 FECAL POSITIVE SAMPLES - RESPONSE PROCEDURE ....................................................10 6 DRINKING WATER QUALITY MONITORING RESULTS...................................................11 7 DEVELOPMENTS IN 2006 ...........................................................................................................14 7.1 RE-CHLORINATION..................................................................................................................14 7.2 SECURITY PROCEDURES ........................................................................................................ 14 7.3 WATER FLUSHING MESSAGE FROM THE FRASER HEALTH AUTHORITY...................14 8 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................15 APPENDIX A - TURBIDITY VS. FREE CHLORINE GRAPHS APPENDIX B - WEEKLY SAMPLE GVRD LAB RESULTS APPENDIX C - DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS GVRD LAB RESULTS APPENDIX D - GVRD COQUITLAM SOURCE AND TREATED WATER QUALITY APPENDIX E - 2006-2008 CAPITAL PROGRAM APPENDIX F - MAPS Prepared by: Barb Croucher Ed Mitchell District of Maple Ridge June 2007 Reviewed by: Andrew Wood, PhD., PEng. District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The District of Maple Ridge operates a water utility under permit by the Fraser Health Authority (FHA). The Municipality is a distributor of water that is supplied and treated by the GVRD from its Coquitlam Lake source. In 2006, the Municipality purchased 12.4 million cubic meters of water from GVRD, a volume increase of 3.07% from 2005, and supplied water to approximately 60.000 residents. Samples from 16 locations in the distribution system are taken weekly and are analyzed by the GVRD. The results are sent to the Municipal Operations and Engineering departments and to the FHA. The Municipality's objective is to maintain a minimal free chlorine residual of 0.20 mgfL, which was achieved on average in all 16 sampling stations. Lower chlorine levels tend to occur in the eastern part of the distribution system, a situation that is being addressed with re-chlorination stations operating in strategic locations. Turbidity was generally low with only 13.67% of all samples having an NTU greater than 1, the established target stipulated in the Canadian Safe Drinking Water Guidelines. There was a decrease in the total number of samples having a heterotrophic plate count (HPC) of 500 CFU/ml or greater from 18 in 2005 to 7 in 2006. This is much lower than the 60 in 2001, reflecting operating changes to improve water quality. There were no samples testing positive for fecal coliform and no samples containing more than 10 total coliform per lOOmL. Therefore the microbiological standards were met for 2006. In 2006, a total of 4 samples were analyzed for pH and 8 samples for trihalomethanes (see Appendix C). All samples were within the aesthetically desirable range of 6.8 to 7.2 pH Units. This is consistent with the 2005 results and an improvement over 2000 when 32% of samples had pH levels below the aesthetically desirable range. Total trihalomethane results ranged from 10 to 35 parts per billion (ppb) with an average of 21 ppb. This was similar to 2005 when results ranged from 18 to 31 parts per billion (ppb) with an average of 24 ppb, 2004 when results ranged from 14 to 32 parts per billion (ppb) with an average of 23 ppb, and with 2003 results which ranged from 15 to 28 parts per billion (ppb) with an average of 21 ppb. The Health Canada Guidelines released in April 2004 propose a maximum allowable concentration of 100 ppb on which consultation has been concluded. Haloacetic acids were also measured in 8 samples (see Appendix C). Total haloacetic acid concentrations ranged from 24 to 71 ppb with an average of 41 ppb. There is currently no standard for total haloacetic acids in Canada, though Health Canada indicates that standards are being prepared, however USEPA rules stipulate a maximum allowable concentration of 60 ppb. Water quality in Maple Ridge was generally good in 2006. District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 2 INTRODUCTION This document is the Municipality's annual Drinking Water Quality Report for 2006. This report is prepared for the Fraser Health Authority (as required by the Municipality's "Operating Permit for the Municipal Waterworks System"), and for public information. Contents of the report include an outline of the regulatory framework, and water quality monitoring data and results for the year 2006. Page 1 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 3 BACKGROUND 3.1 REGULATORY OUTLINE The Municipality operates a water utility under the provisions of the Local Government Act (Provincial), and under permit by the Provincial Ministry of Health Services Frasçr Health Authority (FHA). In 2003, the Drinking Water Protection Act was brought into force. This Act requires regulations that brought the Act into effect and on May 16, 2003, the then current regulations were repealed and were replaced with the new Drinking Water Protection Regulation. The new regulations rely on Drinking Water Officers, and for Maple Ridge is administered by the FHA. 3.2 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM The Municipality is a distributor and purveyor of water and is reliant on the GVRD for source water quality control. However, the Municipality also operates 5 secondary re-chlorination stations to maintain residual chlorine in the system. Treated water is delivered to the Municipality by the GVRD via the Maple Ridge Main and 248 Street Reservoir. Coquitlam Lake is the primary source of water delivered to Maple Ridge. GVRD has the capability to transfer water from the Seymour and Capilano sources and maintain supply to Maple Ridge in the event of disruptions at Coquitlam Lake. In 2006, the Municipality purchased 12.4 million cubic meters of water from G\'RD, a volume increase of 3.07% from 2005. The Municipality's water utility directly serves approximately 60,000 residents. The water distribution infrastructure includes 361 km of water main, over 18,000 connections, 6 pump stations, 8 reservoir sites, and 5 re-chlorination stations. The service area, pressure zones, and facility locations are mapped in Appendix F. Two new reservoirs were added in 2005 at Rock Ridge and at 104 Avenue and 248 Street. Table I identifies the types of material used in the pipe system and their respective lengths. Over 75 per cent of the Municipality's mains are ductile iron, most of which is concrete lined. New installations are all cement mortar lined and poly-wrapped ductile iron. Corrosion in these installations is very minimal which helps maintain high water quality. Table 1 Maple Ridge's Distribution Pipe Lengths and Materials Material Length (km) Asbestos Cement 57 Cast Iron 13 Ductile Iron 287 PVC 3 Steel TOTAL 361 Page 2 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 3.3 WATER PURCHASED (TOTAL) In 2006, the Municipality purchased 12.4 million cubic meters of water from GVRD, a volume increase of 3.07 % from the equivalent period in 2005. 3.4 WATER SOLD (METERED) In 2006, the Municipality sold 3,845,474 cubic meters of water to metered customers, a volume increase of 13.13% from the equivalent period in 2005. Page 3 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 4 DRINKING WATER QUALITY PROGRAM 4.1 FACILITY MAINTENANCE Water quality is influenced by water system maintenance and improvement strategies that are in place in Maple Ridge. The following are a few of the maintenance strategies that are implemented by the Municipality's Operations Department. Unidirectional Flushing Unidirectional flushing is a method of cleaning sediment and material accumulation from the watermains. Flow velocity is increased in one direction through the pipe and the water is discharged (carrying the sediment with it) through fire hydrants or blow off points. The Municipality cleans approximately 105 km of main (31% of the system) annually using this method. Due to water conservation efforts, flushing was limited to winter only. Reservoir Reservoirs are sized for future growth and fire flow demands, and therefore have storage capacities that exceed normal daily demands. Using in place SCADA controls, reservoir levels are optimized to reduce the age of water stored and maintain acceptable chlorine residual levels. The Municipality also cleans its reservoirs on a 6 year cycle. In 2005, different cleaning methodologies were examined by the Operations Department and decided to maintain current practices. Automatic Hydrant Flushers Three automatic hydrant flushers have been installed on the water distribution system in an effort to improve circulation and reduce the age of water stored in large mains in areas of low demand. At this time the two locations are 125 Avenue between 254 and 256 Streets, and 251 A Street north of 130 Avenue, and 101A Avenue and 243A Street. The flushers are operated by automatic timers and are set to discharge at various intervals between 2:00 am and 5:00 am each morning. Watermain Repairs and Improvements Water quantity, quality, and reliability can be improved through continual repairs and replacements. Computer modeling is typically used to identify deficiencies in the system and design replacement components. Pipes in the system are replaced, as they are identified. The current water system capital works program is identified in Appendix E. Valve Exercising Valves are a critical component of a water system. The Municipality has an annual program of exercising 50% of the system's valves annually. Page 4 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Fire Hydrants Providing water for fire fighting is a very important role of a water distribution system. To ensure that hydrants are functioning and adequate water demands for fighting fires can be met, the Municipality performs 560A services and I 140B services to its hydrants annually. Punip Stations To ensure that pumps remain functional, pump stations are inspected weekly for a number of parameters and a regular maintenance schedule is in place. 4.2 RE-CHLORINATION STATIONS The Municipality has installed re-chlorination stations in the eastern part of the distribution system to address historically low chlorine residuals in this area. The re-chlorination stations are ClorTec T-2 and T-6 systems that utilize salt instead of chlorine gas as the chlorine source. The maximum daily output of Cl, gas equivalent is 3 kg per day. The stations are located at the 263 Street, 248 Street, 256 Street Reservoirs, 270A Street and 104 Avenue Pump Stations. These stations are monitored and adjusted on a weekly basis. Chlorine analyzers have been installed at the 263 Street Pump Station and 248 Street Pump Stations to monitor chlorine levels. The analyzer at 248 Street Pump Station automatically adjusts injected chlorine according to the existing chlorine levels in the GVWD water. 4.3 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING AND MONITORING The Municipality and GVWD monitor water quality in a cooperative manner. Water quality is monitored on a weekly basis at the District's 16 water sample locations and at 1 GVWD location in the Municipality to determine the water quality in its system. Monitoring frequencies have been unchanged since 2002. Turbidity levels from the GVWD source waters of Capilano, Seymour and Coquitlam are reported in the Vancouver Sun and on the GVRD web site on a daily basis. Turbidity may affect water disinfection. There is no safe/unsafe level of turbidity, but levels of I NTU detected by the GVWD (Health Canada Guidelines) prompt increased disinfection at the GVWD source. Since 2003, the GVRD has made operational changes that whenever turbidity levels rise over 1 NTU a public advisory is issued on their web site. The samples are taken from "standpipe" sampling stations. The last new sampling locations were added in January 2006 and sampling was initiated at that time. The sampling sites and codes are listed in Table 2 geographically shown on maps in Appendix F. Table 2 Weekly Sample Locations and Codes Sample Code Location MPR-431 DewdneyTrunkRoad@ 20 lB Street MPR-432 224 Street 2l 122 Avenue MPR-433 232 Street North of 130 Avenue MPR-434 102 Avenue East of 241A Street MPR-43 5 240 Street 200m South of Abernethy Way MPR-436 125 Avenue 140m West of Ansell Street Page 5 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 MPR437 248 Street @ 116 Avenue MPR-438 125 Avenue 200m West of 256 Street. MPR-439 130 Avenue @ 251A Street (West of 256 Street) MPR-440 232 Street @ 117 Avenue MPR-441 132 Avenue @ Cedar Way MPR-442 Princess Street @ Ditton Street. MPR-443 216 Street @ Donovan MPR-444 Foreman Drive at Marc Road MPR-445 127 Avenue and 266 Street MPR-446 128 Avenue and Willow Place Samples are taken weekly by the Municipality's Operation Department staff and sent to the GVWD for analysis. The sample at the GVWD's Maple Ridge pump station is taken directly by the GVWD. The GVWD lab sends the results to the Municipality and the FHA by e-mail and facsimile. (these results are fully tabulated for 2006 in Appendix B). In addition, the FHA takes audit samples biweekly throughout the Municipality. G\TWD takes samples from their system within Maple Ridge at an additional three locations, the results of which are included in Appendix B. It is important to note that this monitoring program provides a representative picture of drinking water quality in the system and within municipal mains. However, it does not provide a definite picture of drinking water quality within buildings, where water quality can change significantly due to pipe materials, standing times, temperature, and other factors. It can be assumed that samples taken within buildings will be of different quality than those taken from sites on municipal mains. 4.4 BACTERIOLOGICAL MONITORING Weekly samples from all the stations listed in Table 2 are analyzed for fecal coliform, total coliform, and heterotrophic plate count (HPC) as shown in Appendix B. Schedule A of the BCDWPR stipulates microbiological standards as shown in Table 3. These standards remain unchanged for 2006. Monitoring results for 2006 related to Table 3 are shown in Section 6 of this report. Table 3 BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation Microbiological Standards (Extracted from Appendix A) Parameter Occurrence Standard_ Fecal Coliform Total Coliform I sample Less than 1 fecal coliforrn per lOOmL I sample in a 30 day 0 total coliform per lOOmL period more than I sample in At least 90% of samples have 0 a 30 day period, total coliform per lOOmL and no sample has more than 10 total coliform per lOOmL Page 6 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Monitoring and sampling frequency are stipulated by the Medical Health Officer and generally follow the federal "Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality". Current requirements are identified in Table 4. With a total of 16 weekly sampling sites at various points in the Municipality's water distribution system, the average number of monthly samples is in accordance with the guideline of 60; an additional GVRD location that is located at a pump station at Dewdney Trunk Road & Lougheed Highway can also provide a point of reference. As the Municipality's population grows additional sampling sites will be added. There were 3 sites added in 2006. Table 4 Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality Monitoring Frequency Population Served Target No. of Samples per Month Up to 5,000 4 5,000 to 90,000 1 per 1,000 of population 9000 and up 90 pjjperl0,0OQppulation - Maple Ridge Distribution 60 yprox.6!200Qpp. 4.5 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL MONITORING The proposed monitoring program for chemical and physical characteristics of the water in municipal distribution mains is shown in Table 5. Except where otherwise noted, approximately 10% of the sample sites in each municipal system will be sampled for the following parameters at the frequency shown. The sample sites for this testing will be selected with regard to local conditions including factors such as water source, pipe materials, 'ocation of water treatment facilities, etc. Table 5 Chemical/Physical Monitoring in Municipal Distribution Systems Parameter Location Frequency Free Chlorine All Weekly, tests run when Residual and bacteriological samples Temperature are taken. Copper* Selected taps in public buildings (e.g. Semi-annually. schools). ** Haloacetic acids Municipal Sites-cross section. Quarterly. Representative of all three sources, Minimum of one per municipality. Iron Representative municipal sites - Semi-annually. unlined irorrand steel mains. Lead* Selected taps in public buildings (e.g. Semi-annually. schools). ** Odour Any or all sites. On Complaint Basis. PH Municipal Sites-cross section, Semi-annually. Representative of all three sources, Tem perature _RgTesentative munic±pal sites. Quarterly.________ Page 7 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Parameter Location Frequency Trihalomethanes Municipal Sites-Cross section, Quarterly. Representative of all sources, minimum of three per municipality. Turbidity Municipal Sites - all. Weekly, collected with bacteriological samples. Vinyl Chloride Municipal sites where PVC pipe is Semi-annually. used in the distribution system - minimum of one per potentially affected system. Zinc* Selected taps in public buildings Semi-annually. (e.g. schools. ** * At the point of consumption on flushed samples. ** Details of sampling to be worked out with the (Fraser) Health Authority. Page 8 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 EMERGENCY RESPONSE 5.1 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS The various agencies would be notified in the situations shown in Table 6. Table 6 Notification For Unusual Situations Affecting Water Potability Situation Notifying Agency Time Frame For Agency Notified Notification GVRD Fecal Positive GVRD GVRD MHO Immediate2 Sample Municipality' Municipal Fecal Positive Laboratory Public Health4 Immediate2 Sample Municipality Chemical Contamination- GVRD GVRD MITO Immediate GVRD Municipality' Chemical Contamination- Municipality Public Health Immediate Turbidity >5 NTU. Municipality (ies) 1 GVRD GVRD MHO Immediate Disinfection Failure- GVRD GVRD MHO Immediate Source Water Municipality' (Primary Disinfection) Disinfection Failure- GVRD GVRD MHO Immediate, in any Re-chlorination Municipality' situation in which (Secondary Disinfection) the BCDWPR or the GCDWQ may not be met. Loss of Pressure Municipality Public Health Immediate Due to High Demand GVRD Line Break—Municipality' Municipality Public Health As required by the Health Authority Line Break—GVRD' GVRD Municipality As required by the Municipalities Line Break—Municipality6 Municipality Public Health Immediate Line Break—GVRD6 GVRD GVRD MHO Immediate Municitalitv' Affected municipality (ies) to notify local public health contact. See Section 5.2 GVRD for samples being processed by GVRD laboratory. BCDWPR requires the laboratory to notify public health. With no suspected contamination. With suspected contamination. Page 9 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 5.2 FECAL POSITIVE SAMPLES - RESPONSE PROCEDURE If a sample analyzed by the GVRD lab is fecal coliform positive, the following response plan will be put into action by the GVRD. Response plans will be different depending on whether the sample is from GVRD location (transmission main or reservoir) or from municipal sampling location. Fecal Positive Sample from a Municipal Distribution System The microbiology lab supervisor will be notified. Results of interim samples, if any, from the site will be examined. Interim samples are any samples that may have been taken from the site in the period between when the fecal positive sample was taken and when it was determined to be fecal positive. The chlorine residual noted on the sampler's field sheet will be reviewed and compared to previous readings to determine if there had been a localized loss of disinfectant residual. 4. The appropriate public health representative and the municipality will be notified and informed of the fecal positive sample. The municipality (purveyor) will evaluate the need for a "boil water" advisory in consultation with the public health representative. Information about the sample location in general or some specifics about that particular sampling day will be considered in the decision making process, along with information gathered in steps 1 and 3. The procedures outlined in Appendix 3, Contingency Plan For Water Quality, will be followed. Procedures necessary for the identification of the species of the "Fecal Positive" organism with standard biochemical tests will be initiated by the laboratory. Arrangements will be made between the laboratory, the municipality, and public health for the collection of a repeat sample (including, where possible, samples from upstream and downstream of the fecal positive sample location). The laboratory will contact the municipality with the repeat sample results and the results of the species identification on the fecal positive sample when these tests are complete. The municipality will forward these results to the public health representative. Page 10 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 6 DRINKING WATER QUALITY MONITORING RESULTS The GVRD reported that source water quality was good in 2006 (ref GVRD Quality Control Annual Report 2006). Summary results of GVRD's Coquitlam Lake source and treated water quality analysis are included in Appendix D. Results of the sampling within Maple Ridge are in Appendix B. Summaries of these data sets are provided in Table 7 and 8. The Municipality's objective is to maintain a free chlorine residual of 0.20 mgIL. The map "Average Chlorine 2006" in Appendix F shows the distribution system sampling locations with colour coding identifying the average level of free chlorine in 2006. Lower chlorine levels are tending to occur in the eastern part of the system. Section 6 of the 241M Northeast Zone Integration Report (Kerr Wood Leidal) identifies the need to improve the chionne residuals for this area. As a result, two automatic hydrant flushers have been installed on the water distribution system in an effort to improve circulation and reduce the age of water stored in large mains in areas of low demand. At this time the two locations are 125 Avenue between 254 and 256 Streets (DmMPR-438), and 25 1A Street north of 130 Avenue. The flushers are operated by automatic timers and are set to discharge at various intervals between 2:00 am and 5:00 am each morning. Turbidity was generally low with only 13.67% of all samples having an NTU greater than 1, the physical standard stipulated by the BCDWPR. Turbidity vs. free chlorine plots in Appendix A suggests that there is no relation between the two parameters in 2006. Table 7 Maple Ridge Sites - 2006 Average Physical Results by Site CL2Free TEMP Turbidit Site mtfL oC NTU DrnMPR-431 0.96 9.73 0.66 DmMPR-432 0.84 9.19 0.54 DmMPR-433 0.82 8.73 0.70 DrnMPR-434 0.51 9.68 0.56 DrnMPR-435 0.58 9.42 0.79 DmMPR-436 0.65 9.34 0.51 DmMPR437 0.75 9.08 0.57 DmMPR438 049 9.36 0.71 DmMPR439 0.48 9.32 0.73 DmMPR-440 0.83 8.96 0.58 DmMPR-441 0.62 9.82 0.55 DmMPR-442 0.83 9.36 0.53 DmMPR-443 0.88 9.34 0.55 DmMPR-444 0.60 9.10 0.57 DmMPR-445 0.34 9.59 0.62 DmMPR-446 0.63 8.66 0.68 Aggregate 0.68 9.29 0.62 Page 11 Districtof Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Table 8 GVWD Sites - 2006 Average Physical Results by Site CL2Free Site mg/L GVWD72 0.813 Figure 1 shows the percent of samples collected in 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 that had a Heterotrophic Plate Count (HPC) of 500 CFU/ml or greater. There was a decreasing trend in the total number of such samples from, to 60 in 2001, to 13 in 2002, to 14 in 2003, 9 in 2004 with a slight increase to 14 in 2005, and then a decrease to 7 in 2006. No samples tested positive for total coliform bacteria in a 30 day period in 2006, the same as in 2005, and a decrease from the 2% in 2001 which was still well below the maximum 10% allowed. No samples from the GVRD source tested positive for total coliform. This in sum total represents 0% of the samples. There were no samples testing positive for fecal coliform and no samples containing more than 10 total coliform per 1 OOmL. Therefore the microbiological standards were met for 2006. In 2006 a total of 6 samples were analyzed for pH and 16 for trihalomethanes (see Appendix C). Results for pH ranged from 6.8 to 7.2 pH Units. All samples were within the aesthetically desirable range of 6.5 to 8.5 pH Units, as were all of the 2005 samples. Both years are an improvement over 2000 when 32% of samples had pH levels below the aesthetically desirable range. These measured levels were very much in keeping with pH levels in the Coquitlam Lake source. Total trihalomethane results ranged from 10 to 35 parts per billion (ppb) with an average of 21.5 ppb. This was a decrease from 2005 when results ranged from 18 to 31 parts per billion (ppb) with an average of 24 parts per billion (ppb). This is shown in Appendix C. The previous BC Safe Drinking Regulations stipulated an allowable total trihalomethane level of 100 ppb. However, the new BCDWPR does not prescribe a standard, but Health Canada is proposing guidelines of 100 ppb. Haloacetic acids were also measured in 16 samples (see Appendix C). Total haloacetic acid concentrations ranged from 24 to 71 ppb with an average of 41, a slight decrease from 2005 when results ranged from 24 to 62 ppb with an average of 42, which was higher than the 2004 results of 15 to 60 ppb with an average of 30 ppb. There is currently no standard for total haloacetic acids in Canada however USEPA rules stipulate a maximum allowable concentration of 60 ppb. Page 12 Disthct of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Figure 1 Percentage of Samples Having a IIPC Greater Than 500 CFU/ml Per Month Shown 25% 20% WVA 10% 5% 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 02001 •2002 02003 02004 02005 02006 Page 13 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 7 DEVELOPMENTS IN 2006 7.1 RE-CHLORINATION In 2005, the Municipality installed a re-chlorination station at 104 Avenue and 245A Street. Currently, all installations are ClorTec T-2 and T-6 systems that use salt instead of chlorine gas as a source of chlorine and therefore are much safer and easier to operate. The T-2 systems are very small having a maximum output of 1 kg per day of chlorine gas equivalent. Having a few of these systems in series allows much finer control and a more even distribution of chlorine levels. A chlorine analyzer was installed at the 263 Street Pump Station in 2002. The analyzer provides data for the Operations Department staff to monitor chlorine levels and adjust the dosage rates accordingly. 7.2 SECURITY PROCEDURES Since 2001, a number of additional security actions were implemented as follows: Daily inspections of reservoirs, including weekends. Inspections are fully documented. Security measures have been implemented to combat breaches to reservoirs. Standard operating and reporting procedures have been reviewed and redeveloped. Staff training has been implemented in assessing vandalism impacts and reporting procedures. 7.3 WATER FLUSHING MESSAGE FROM THE FRASER HEALTH AUTHORITY Since 2001, the FHA has requested that the following message be included in this report. Did you know that water that comes out of your tap first thing in the morning might have higher amounts of lead? This is why you should always run your tap for at least one minute first thing in the morning or any other time water has been left standing for a long time. Conserving water is still important. Rather than just running the water down the drain you could use the water for things such as watering your plants. Page 14 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 8 CONCLUSION This report provides an outline of the water quality of the District of Maple Ridge's water distribution system, as well as the initiatives and program being performed by the District of Maple Ridge. Page 15 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 APPENDIX A - TURBIDITY VS FREE CHLORINE GRAPHS Page Al District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 DmMpr-431: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity CL2Free mg/i - Turbidity NTU DmMpr-432: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity - CL2Free mg/I - Turbidity NTU Page A2 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 DmMpr-433: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity i - CL2Free mg/i - Turbidity NTU DmMpr.434: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity - CL2Free mg/i - Turbidity NTU 7 .5 . . .. . . . ..;.. . 7 ..' 6.5 . ...., . ............- 6 .. . . . . 55 5 ................................................. 4 - . . ................................................................................... 2.5 -... . 1.5 ,,, Date Page A3 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 DmMpr.435: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity —CL2Free mg/i —Turbidity NTU \ Date DmMpr-436: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity - CL2Free mg/i - Turbidity NTU 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 I-. 2 4.5 .c 4 C (V 3.5 3 E 2.5 2 1.5 0.5 0 Date Page A4 District of Maple Ridge - Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 DmMpr-437: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity - CL2Free mg/i - Turbidity NTU C 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 0.5 0 ç \\ Date DmMpr.438: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity - CL2Free mg/i - Turbidity NTIJ C 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 0.5 0 Date Page A5 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 DmMpr-439: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity - CL2Free mg/i - Turbidity NTU 6.5 77 cc 2.5 1.5 \ \ /$' <A(? ?( I < I Date DmMpr-440: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity - CL2Free mg/I - Turbidity NTU ,, I I I I I I I I I I Date Page A6 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 z 4.5 4 3.5 ; 3 C) :E 2.5 2 1.5 0.5 0 /1 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 DmMpr-441: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity - CL2 Free mg/i - TurbiditypyJ 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 z 4.5 4 3.5 H 3 2.5 2 1.5 0.5 0 \ \9 1? çb 4 Date DmMpr-442: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity - CL2Free mg/i - Turbidfty NTU Date Page A7 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 DmMpr-443: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity - CL2Free mg/i - Turbidity NTU 7.5 ..... .... ...- 7 - - 6.5 6 VVV V iD 5 z 4.5 HC 4 V .1..... . T.. 35 3 V• .. .....:.. V . E25 0.5 _ V ' \ \\ .o •' Date DmMpr.444: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity - CL2Free mg/I - Turbidity NTU 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 ;Z 4.5 4 3.5 3 C) E 2.5 2 1.5 0.5 0 V \< \ Date Page A8 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 D 5 z 4.5 4 3.5 3 E 2.5 2 1.5 0.5 0 "1 / \ I District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 DmMpr-445: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity - CL2Free mgll - Turbidity NTU 7.5 -" •.• - . :i: 7 -... - .. 6.5 -: 6 - - 5.5 - --• 5 -- 15 0.5 , lb Date DmMpr-446: Free CL2 vs. Turbidity -CL2Free mgi] - Turbidity NTU Date Page A9 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 APPENDIX B - WEEKLY SAMPLE GVRD LAB RESULTS Page Bi Disthct of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL, mg/L Fecal Coliforms MFIlOOrriL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-431 03/01/2006 9:10 1.2 <1 <2 1 <1 1.6 MPR-431 10/01/2006 9:13 1.2 <1 <2 7 <1 0.9 MPR-431 17/01/2006 8:55 0.87 <1 2 2 <1 0.75 MPR-431 24/01/2006 9:20 0.98 <1 2 7 <1 0.45 MPR-431 31/01/2006 9:20 0.98 <1 <2 1 <1 0.33 MPR-431 07/02/2006 9:13 1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.35 MPR-431 14/02/2006 9:10 0.96 <1 <2 <0.5 <1 0.37 MPR-431 2 1/02/2006 9:20 0.76 <1 2 6 <1 0.38 MPR-431 28/02/2006 8:15 0.87 <1 <2 7 <1 0.42 MPR-431 07/03/2006 8:26 0.81 <1 <2 6 <1 0.45 MPR-431 14/03/2006 9:00 0.73 <1 <2 1 <1 0.63 MPR-431 2 1/03/2006 8:25 0.98 <1 2 7 <1 0.44 MPR-431 28/03/2006 8:20 0.75 <1 2 2 <1 0.48 MPR-431 04/04/2006 8:20 0.95 1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.46 MPR-431 11/04/20068:15 0.71 <1 <2 2 <1 0.36 MPR431 18/04/2006 8:20 0.97 <1 <2 8 <1 0.59 MPR-431 26/04/2006 8:15 0.72 <1 2 5 <1 0.47 MPR..431 1 02/05/2006 8:15 0.46 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR-431 j 09/05/2006 8:19 1 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.49 MPR-431 16/05/2006 8:25 0.55 <1 <2 6 <1 0.44 MPR-431 23/05/2006 8:15 0.65 <1 18 8 <1 0.4 MPR-431 30/05/2006 8:10 0.87 <1 6 7 <1 0.56 MPR-431 06/06/2006 8:05 0.73 <1 76 13 <1 0.47 MPR-431 13/06/2006 8:14 0.69 <1 860 14 <1 0.37 MPR-431 20/06/2006 8:25 1 <1 <2 13 <1 0.52 MPR-431 27/06/2006 8:25 1.1 <1 <2 15 <1 035 MPR-431 04/07/2006 8:12 0.75 <1 1 4 11 <1 0.3 MPR-431 11/07/2006 8:10 0.94 <1 <2 16 <1 0.3 MPR-431 18/07/2006 8:10 0.83 <1 <2 14 <1 0.32 MPR-431 25/07/2006 8:13 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29 MPR-431 01/08/2006 8:15 1.1 <1 4 13 <1 0.52 MPR-431 08/08/2006 8:17 1.2 <1 6 14 <1 0.41 MPR-431 15/08/2006 8:10 0.89 <1 <2 19 <1 0.32 MPR-431 1 22/08/20067:52 1.1 <1 <2 11 <1 0.43 MPR-431 29/08/2006 7:40 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33 MPR-431 05/09/2006 8:10 1 <1 <2 19 <1 0.34 MPR431 1 12/09/2006 8:20 0.84 <1 <2 14 <1 0.21 MPR431 19/09/2006 8:10 1 <1 2 18 <1 0.34 MPR-431 26/09/2006 8:30 1.3 <1 <2 18 <1 2 MPR431 03/10/2006 8:23 0.77 <1 <2 16 <1 0.46 MPR-431 10/10/2006 9:20 1 <1 <2 16 <1 3 Page B2 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL2 mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF!lO0mLs Turbidity NTU MPR-431 17/10/2006 9:10 1.1 <1 <2 15 <1 0.32 MPR-431 24/10/2006 9:15 1 <1 <2 14 <1 0.26 MPR-431 07/11/20069:28 0.98 <1 <2 11 <1 1.2 MPR-431 14/11/20069:21 1.4 <1 <2 10 <1 1.1 MPR-431 21/11/20069:30 1 <1 <2 9 <1 1.6 MPR-431 05/12/2006 10:19 1.2 <1 <2 7 <1 1.5 MPR-431 12/12/2006 9:05 1.5 <1 <2 7 <1 1.4 MPR-431 19/12/20069:30 1.4 <1 <2 6 <1 1.3 MPR-431 27/12/2006 8:05 1.2 <1 5 <1 1.5 MPR-432 03/01/2006 8:50 1.1 <1 <2 1 <1 1.4 MPR-432 10/01/2006 8:27 1 <1 2 7 <1 MPR432 17/01/2006 8:45 0.75 <1 <2 2 <1 0.65 MPR-432 24/01/2006 8:27 0.85 <1 <2 8 <1 0.42 MPR-432 31/01/2006 8:50 0.89 <1 <2 1 <1 0.39 MPR-432 07/02/2006 8:25 0.98 <1 <2 7 <1 0.39 MPR-432 14/02/2006 8:50 0.91 <1 <2 <0.5 <1 0.36 MPR-432 21/02/2006 8:28 0.68 <1 <2 7 <1 0.41 MPR-432 28/02/2006 7:30 0.76 <1 <2 6 <1 0.46 MPR-432 07/03/2006 7:35 0.65 <1 <2 7 <1 0.43 MPR-432 14/03/2006 8:15 0.64 <1 <2 1 <1 0.42 MPR-432 21/03/2006 7:30 0.91 <1 <2 7 <1 0.65 MPR-432 28/03/2006 8:00 0.61 <1 <2 2 <1 0.52 MPR-432 04/04/2006 7:28 0.8 <1 <2 8 <1 0.43 MPR-432 11/04/20067:45 0.59 <1 <2 3 <1 0.4 MPR-432 18/04/2006 7:25 0.75 <1 4 8 <1 0.53 MPR-432 26/04/2006 7:55 0.64 <1 <2 4 <1 0.48 MPR-432 02/05/2006 7:55 0.57 <1 2 4 <1 0.37 MPR432 09/05/2006 7:22 0.84 <1 <2 9 <1 0.49 MPR-432 16/05/2006 8:05 0.81 <1 2 6 <1 0.4 MPR-432 23/05/2006 7:55 0.61 <1 4 6 <1 0.36 MPR-432 30/05/2006 7:16 0.79 <1 <2 5 <1 0.37 MPR-432 06/06/2006 7:45 0.62 <1 2 12 <1 0.57 MPR-432 13/06/2006 7:22 0.54 <1 36 13 <1 0.43 MPR-432 20/06/2006 8:05 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.71 MPR432 27/06/2006 7:55 0.88 <1 <2 13 <1 0.45 MPR-432 04/07/2006 7:20 0.73 <1 2 8 <1 0.29 MPR-432 11/07/20067:50 0.78 <1 <2 18 <1 0.33 MPR-432 18/07/2006 7:50 0.79 <1 <2 14 <1 0.29 MPR-432 25/07/2006 7:20 0.98 <1 2 11 <1 0.29 MPR-432 01/08/20067:25 0.86 <1 12 11 <1 0.28 MPR-432 08/08/20067:27 1.1 <1 <2 11 <1 0.46 MPR-432 15/08/2006 7:50 0.94 <1 4 17 <1 0.3 Page 113 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL2 mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-432 22/08/2006 7:13 0.3 <1 <2 12 <1 0.37 MPR432 29/08/2006 10:39 1 <1 <2 NA <1 0.36 MPR-432 05/09/2006 7:50 0.97 <1 . <2 18 <1 0.31 MPR-432 12/09/2006 7:25 0.69 <1 2 12 <1 0.22 MPR-432 19/09/2006 7:50 0.97 <1 2 16 <1 0.33 MPR-432 26/09/2006 8:10 1 <1 <2 17 <1 0.32 MPR-432 03/10/2006 7:27 0.84 <1 <2 16 <1 0.56 MPR-432 10/10/2006 9:00 1 <1 6 15 <1 0.25 MPR-432 17/10/2006 8:15 0.99 <1 <2 15 <1 0.44 MPR-432 24/10/2006 8:55 0.99 <1 110 14 <1 0.27 MPR-432 07/11/2006 8:30 1.1 <1 2 11 <1 1.1 MPR-432 14/11/2006 8:28 0.71 <1 <2 10 <1 1.1 MPR-432 21/11/2006 8:40 0.85 <1 2 9 <1 1.4 MPR-432 05/12/2006 8:25 1.1 <1 <2 7 <1 1.2 MPR-432 12/12/2006 8:45 0.84 <1 <2 7 <1 1 MPR-432 19/12/2006 8:28 1 <1 <2 7 <1 1 MPR-432 27/12/2006 7:45 1.2 <1 6 <1 1.1 MPR433 03/01/2006 8:20 0.95 <1 4 2 <1 1.4 MPR-433 10/01/2006 8:38 0.91 <1 <2 7 <1 0.79 MPR433 17/01/2006 8:15 0.57 <1 <2 3 <1 0.7 MPR-433 24/01/2006 8:40 0.71 <1 <2 7 <1 0.44 MPR-433 31/01/2006 8:15 1.1 <1 2 2 <1 0.53 MPR-433 07/02/2006 8:37 0.68 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32 MPR-433 14/02/2006 8:35 0.89 <1 <2 <0.5 <1 0.27 MPR-433 2 1/02/2006 8:40 0.62 <1 <2 6 <1 0.38 MPR-433 28/02/2006 7:40 0.67 <1 2 7 <1 0.56 MPR433 07/03/2006 7:50 0.7 <1 8 7 <1 0.37 MPR-433 14/03/2006 7:30 0.17 <1 64 1 <1 0.55 MPR-433 21/03/2006 7:43 0.81 <1 6 6 <1 0.48 MPR-433 28/03/2006 7:30 0.77 <1 <2 1 <1 0.43 MPR-433 04/04/2006 7:39 0.79 <1 <2 7 <1 0.38 MPR-433 11/04/2006 7:25 0.87 <1 <2 3 <1 2.6 MPR-433 18/04/2006 7:40 0.92 <1 <2 8 <1 0.57 MPR-433 26/04/2006 7:30 0.66 <1 <2 3 <1 1.8 MPR433 02/05/2006 7:20 0.67 <1 <2 3 <1 0.33 MPR433 09/05/2006 7:35 0.36 <1 2 9 <1 0.31 MPR-433 16/05/2006 7:45 0.73 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR-433 23/05/2006 7:40 0.76 <1 <2 6 <1 0.38 MPR-433 30/05/2006 7:30 0.54 <1 20 5 <1 0.44 MPR-433 06/06/2006 7:30 0.75 <1 <2 11 <1 0.74 MPR-433 13/06/2006 7:34 0.77 <1 <2 13 <1 0.44 MPR433 20/06/2006 7:50 0.93 <1 <2 13 <1 0.55 Page B4 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL, mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL HeterotropKic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-433 27/06/2006 7:35 0.93 <1 <2 13 <1 0.85 MPR-433 04/07/2006 7:30 0.84 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3 MPR-433 11/07/20067:35 0.81 <1 <2 17 <1 0.28 MPR-433 18/07/2006 7:35 0.79 <1 <2 13 <1 0.38 MPR433 25/07/2006 7:30 0.94 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR-433 01/08/20067:35 0.94 <1 <2 10 <1 0.31 MPR-433 08/08/20067:39 1.1 <1 <2 11 <1 0.35 MPR433 15/08/2006 7:30 0.82 <1 <2 16 <1 0.56 MPR433 22/08/2006 7:26 0.96 <1 2 11 <1 0.54 MPR-433 29/08/2006 7:00 0.76 <1 <2 11 <1 0.38 MPR-433 05/09/2006 7:30 0.89 <1 <2 16 <1 2.1 MPR433 12/09/20067:55 1 <1 <2 11 <1 0.34 MPR-433 19/09/2006 7:30 0.81 <1 <2 16 <1 0.26 MPR-433 26/09/2006 7:30 0.98 <1 <2 16 <1 1.7 MPR-433 03/10/2006 7:38 1 <1 2 15 <1 0.45 MPR-433 10/10/2006 8:30 0.93 <1 <2 14 <1 0.57 MPR-433 17/10/2006 8:27 0.91 <1 <2 13 <1 0.32 MPR-433 24/10/2006 8:28 0.98 <1 2 13 <1 0.33 MPR-433 07/11/2006 8:45 0.79 <1 <2 11 <1 1.4 MPR-433 14/11/20068:41 1.2 <1 4 9 <1 0.96 MPR-433 21/11/20068:50 0.89 <1 <2 9 <1 1.3 MPR-433 05/12/2006 8:37 1 <1 <2 6 <1 1.6 MPR-433 12/12/2006 8:25 0.58 <1 2 5 <1 1.4 MPR433 19/12/2006 8:44 1.1 <1 <2 7 <1 1 MPR-433 j 27/12/2006 7:20 0.78 <1 6 <1 1.2 MPR-434 03/01/2006 9:55 0.53 <1 <2 2 <1 1.8 MPR-434 10/01/2006 9:51 0.54 <1 <2 8 <1 1.2 MPR-434 17/01/2006 9:45 0.4 <1 2 3 <1 0.59 MPR434 24/01/2006 10:02 0.42 <1 <2 8 <1 0.42 LMPR-434 31/01/2006 10:05 1 <1 <2 1 <1 0.37 MPR434 07/02/2006 9:55 0.62 <1 <2 7 <1 0.45 MPR-434 14/02/2006 9:45 0.64 <1 <2 1 <1 0.46 MPR434 21/02/2006 10:30 0.39 <1. <2 6 <1 0.54 MPR-434 28/02/2006 8:50 0.44 <1 2 8 <1 0.42 MPR-434 07/03/2006 9:27 0.33 <1 400 7 <1 0.46 MPR-434 14/03/2006 11:15 0.32 <1 2 6 <1 0.66 MPR-434 21/03/2006 9:10 0.57 <1 <2 7 <1 0.45 MPR-434 28/03/2006 8:50 0.75 <1 <2 3 <1 0.5 MPR-434 04/04/2006 9:03 0.46 <1 <2 8 <1 0.4 MPR-434 11/04/20069:00 0.57 <1 <2 3 <1 0.41 MPR-434 18/04/2006 9:10 0.62 <1 <2 8 <1 0.54 MPR-434 26/04/2006 9:00 1 0.52 <1 2 4 <1 0.45 Page B5 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL, mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-434 02/05/2006 8:55 0.55 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR-434 09/05/2006 11:00 0.36 <1 82 10 <1 0.42 MPR-434 16/05/2006 9:10 0.29 <1 <2 6 <1 0.57 MPR-434 23/05/2006 8:55 0.56 <1 <2 8 <1 0.34 MPR-434 30/05/2006 8:52 0.38 <1 <2 7 <1 0.39 MPR-434 06/06/2006 8:50 0.5 <1 <2 14 <1 0.51 MPR-434 13/06/2006 8:56 0.34 <1 4 14 <1 0.42 MPR-434 20/06/2006 9:10 0.3 <1 <2 14 <1 0.39 MPR-434 27/06/2006 9:10 0.39 <1 <2 14 <1 0.43 MPR-434 04/07/2006 8:55 0.12 <1 40 10 <1 0.4 MPR-434 11/07/2006 8:45 0.29 <1 8 15 <1 0.3 MPR-434 18/07/2006 8:45 0.36 <1 12 13 <1 0.31 MPR-434 25/07/2006 8:58 0.62 <1 30 12 <1 0.33 MPR-434 01/08/2006 8:57 0.33 <1 20 12 <1 0.35 MPR434 08/08/20068:58 0.48 <1 4 12 <1 0.37 MPR-434 15/08/2006 8:55 0.51 <1 8 17 <1 0.23 MPR-434 22/08/2006 8:30 0.53 <1 4 13 <1 0.26 MPR-434 29/08/2006 8:41 1.1 <1 2 14 <1 0.28 MPR-434 05/09/2006 9:00 0.65 <1 2 19 <1 0.26 MPR-434 12/09/2006 9:25 0.79 <1 <2 13 <1 0.28 MPR-434 19/09/2006 8:55 0.25 <1 2 17 <1 0.23 MPR-434 26/09/2006 9:20 0.77 <1 10 17 <1 0.53 MPR-434 03/10/2006 9:20 0.73 <1 <2 16 <1 0.33 MPR434 10/10/2006 10:00 0.6 <1 2 15 <1 0.47 MPR-434 17/10/2006 11:45 0.58 <1 2 15 <1 0.34 MPR-434 24/10/2006 9:57 0.53 <1 2 14 <1 0.26 MPR-434 07/11/2006 9:57 0.5 <1 <2 11 <1 0.96 MPR-434 14/1 1/2006 9:49 0.54 <1 <2 10 <1 0.91 MPR-434 21/11/2006 10:18 0.51 <1 <2 9 <1 1.4 MPR-434 05/12/2006 10:50 0.46 <1 <2 8 <1 1.4 MPR-434 12/12/2006 9:40 0.6 <1 <2 7 <1 1.7 MPR-434 19/12/2006 10:35 0.86 <1 <2 1 7 <1 1.1 MPR-434 27/12/2006 8:45 0.08 <1 7 <1 1.2 MPR-435 03/01/2006 11:15 0.94 <1 10 2 <1 1.5 MPR435 10/01/2006 11:21 0.88 <1 <2 7 <1 6.7 MPR-435 17/01/2006 10:55 0.56 <1 <2 3 <1 0.66 MPR-435 24/01/2006 12:23 0.8 <1 <2 8 <1 0.39 MPR-435 31/01/2006 11:15 0.96 <1 <2 2 <1 0.44 MPR-435 07/02/2006 11:40 0.98 <1 2 7 <1 0.36 MPR-435 14/02/2006 11:15 0.82 <1 <2 1 <1 0.33 MPR-435 21/02/2006 11:56 0.54 <1 <2 5 <1 0.59 MPR-435 28/02/2006 10:30 0.65 <1 <2 8 <1 0.41 PageB6 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL, mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforrns MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-435 07/03/2006 10:45 0.44 <1 4 7 <1 0.47 MPR435 14/03/2006 11:00 0.49 <1 <2 6 <1 0.89 MPR435 21/03/2006 10:50 0.61 <1 6 7 <1 0.44 MPR435 28/03/2006 10:05 0.44 <1 <2 2 <1 0.46 MPR435 04/04/2006 10:45 0.56 <1 <2 7 <1 0.53 MPR435 11/04/2006 10:20 0.44 <1 <2 3 <1 0.37 MPR435 18/04/2006 10:50 0.64 <1 2 8 <1 0.62 MPR435 26/04/2006 10:15 0.51 <1 2 5 <1 0.46 MPR435 02/05/2006 10:35 0.46 <1 8 5 <1 0.4 MPR-435 09/05/2006 10:45 0.33 <1 4 10 <1 0.35 MPR435 16/05/2006 10:50 0.34 <1 8 7 <1 0.38 MPR435 23/05/2006 10:15 0.53 <1 8 7 <1 0.32 MPR435 30/05/2006 10:40 0.38 <1 52 7 <1 0.45 MPR435 06/06/2006 10:10 0.55 <1 36 14 <1 0.51 MPR-435 13/06/2006 10:51 0.36 <1 <2 13 <1 0.44 MPR435 20/06/2006 11:00 0.44 <1 2 13 <1 0.34 MPR-435 27/06/2006 10:25 0.72 <1 <2 15 <1 0.36 MPR-435 04/07/2006 11:17 0.46 <1 2 10 <1 0.31 MPR435 11/07/2006 10:40 0.53 <1 <2 15 <1 0.35 MPR-435 18/07/2006 10:20 0.45 <1 <2 14 <1 0.3 MPR-435 25/07/2006 11:20 0.69 <1 2 11 <1 0.28 MPR-435 01/08/2006 10:37 0.77 <1 6 11 <1 0.28 MPR-435 08/08/2006 10:40 0.68 <1 <2 12 <1 0.39 MPR-435 15/08/2006 10:05 0.39 <1 <2 17 <1 0.35 MPR-435 22/08/2006 10:39 0.64 <1 <2 12 <1 0.36 MPR-435 29/08/2006 10:26 0.69 <1 <2 12 <1 0.32 MPR435 05/09/2006 10:40 0.7 <1 6 18 <1 0.36 MPR-435 12/09/2006 11:05 0.75 <1 <2 13 <1 0.24 MPR-435 19/09/2006 10:50 0.51 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23 MPR-435 26/09/2006 11:40 0.62 <1 2 16 <1 4.4 MPR-435 03/10/2006 11:34 0.56 <1 <2 16 <1 0.31 MPR-435 10/10/2006 12:10 0.5 <1 <2 15 <1 3.4 MPR435 17/10/2006 12:07 0.7 <1 <2 14 <1 0.44 MPR-435 24/10/2006 12:05 0.54 <1 <2 13 <1 0.28 MPR-435 07/11/2006 11:35 0.45 <1 <2 11 <1 0.87 MPR-435 14/11/2006 12:00 0.38 <1 <2 10 <1 1.1 MPR-435 21/11/2006 12:13 0.56 <1 6 - 9 <1 1.2 MPR-435 05/12/2006 12:58 0.53 <1 <2 6 <1 1.3 MPR-435 12/12/2006 11:15 0.48 <1 <2 7 <1 1.1 MPR-435 19/12/2006 11:55 0.41 <1 4 7 <1 1.1 MPR-435 27/12/2006 10:20 0.44 <1 6 <1 1.1 MPR-436 03/01/200611:10 0.59 <1 10 2 <1 1.4 Page B7 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL2 mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOQmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOQmLs Turbidity NTU MPR436 10/01/2006 11:11 0.54 <1 2400 7 <1 1.2 MPR-436 17/01/2006 10:50 0.49 <1 <2 3 <1 0.49 MPR-436 24/01/2006 12:15 0.51 <1 <2 8 <1 0.42 MPR-436 31/01/2006 11:10 1.1 <1 <2 2 <1 0.33 MPR436 07/02/2006 11:32 0.69 <1 <2 9 <1 0.42 MPR-436 14/02/2006 11:10 0.8 <1 <2 1 <1 0.39 MPR-436 21/02/2006 11:48 0.59 <1 4 6 <1 0.41 MPR-436 28/02/2006 10:20 0.72 <1 6 9 <1 0.34 MPR-436 07/03/2006 10:35 0.47 <1 <2 7 <1 0.44 MPR-436 14/03/2006 10:45 0.49 <1 <2 6 <1 0.41 MPR-436 2 1/03/2006 10:40 0.6 <1 <2 7 <1 0.42 MPR-436 28/03/2006 10:00 0.55 <1 <2 2 <1 0.39 MPR-436 04/04/2006 10:38 0.54 <1 <2 8 <1 0.69 MPR-436 11/04/2006 10:15 0.54 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR436 18/04/2006 10:40 0.58 <1 <2 8 <1 0.47 MPR-436 26/04/2006 10:05 0.88 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36 MPR-436 02/05/2006 10:25 0.69 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR436 09/05/2006 10:34 0.53 <1 <2 10 <1 0.44 MPR-436 16/05/2006 10:45 0.85 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29 MPR-436 23/05/2006 10:05 0.99 <1 2 7 <1 0.31 MPR-436 30/05/2006 10:30 0.6 <1 <2 7 <1 0.38 MPR-436 06/06/2006 10:05 0.68 <1 4 13 <1 0.76 MPR-436 13/06/2006 10:43 0.31 <1 <2 13 <1 0.45 MPR436 20/06/2006 10:50 0.74 <1 <2 13 <1 0.32 MPR436 27/06/2006 10:20 0.82 <1 <2 14 <1 0.35 MPR-436 04/07/2006 11:10 0.65 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33 MPR-436 11/07/2006 10:30 0.73 <1 <2 14 <1 0.32 MPR-436 18/07/2006 10:15 0.21 <1 <2 14 <1 0.31 MPR-436 25/07/2006 11:12 0.61 1 <1 2 11 <1 0.31 MPR-436 01/08/2006 10:28 0.91 <1 1400 11 <1 0.34 MPR-436 08/08/2006 10:30 0.53 <1 <2 11 <1 0.43 MPR-436 15/08/2006 10:00 0.21 <1 <2 17 <1 0.28 MPR436 22/08/2006 10:30 0.58 <1 2 12 <1 0.38 MPR436 29/08/2006 10:20 0.86 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26 MPR436 05/09/2006 10:35 0.77 <1 <2 17 <1 0.37 MPR-436 12/09/2006 10:58 0.78 <1 4 12 <1 0.24 MPR436 19/09/2006 10:45 0.59 <1 <2 16 <1 0.23 MPR436 26/09/2006 11:30 0.52 <1 <2 16 <1 0.28 MPR-436 03/10/2006 11:26 0.49 <1 2 15 <1 0.37 MPR436 10/10/2006 12:00 0.55 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23 MPR436 17/10/2006 11:58 0.82 <1 <2 14 <1 0.4 MPR436 24/10/2006 11:56 0.45 <1 <2 13 <1 0.29 PageB8 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL2 mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOniL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-436 j 07/11/2006 11:25 0.16 <1 <2 11 <1 0.68 MPR-436 14/11/2006 11:50 0.6 <1 2 10 <1 1 MPR-436 21/11/2006 12:05 0.46 <1 <2 9 <1 . 1.1 MPR436 05/12/2006 12:47 0.72 <1 <2 7 <1 1.4 MPR436 12/12/2006 11:10 1.2 <1 <2 7 <1 1.3 MPR436 19/12/2006 11:48 1 <1 <2 7 <1 1.1 MPR-436 27/12/2006 10:15 1 <1 7 <1 1.2 MPR437 03/01/2006 11:00 1 <1 <2 2 <1 1.4 MPR-437 10/01/2006 10:22 0.59 <1 <2 7 <1 1.1 MPR-437 17/01/2006 10:40 0.75 <1 2 3 <1 0.61 MPR-437 24/01/2006 10:39 0.64 <1 <2 8 <1 0.42 MPR-437 3 1/01/2006 11:05 1 <1 4 1 <1 0.36 MPR437 07/02/2006 10:28 1.2 <1 <2 7 <1 0.35 MPR-437 14/02/2006 11:00 0.91 <1 <2 1 <1 0.35 MPR-437 2 1/02/2006 10:45 0.58 <1 <2 5 <1 0.57 MPR437 1 28/02/2006 10:10 0.81 <1 <2 6 <1 0.47 MPR-437 07/03/2006 9:40 0.57 <1 <2 7 <1 0.56 MPR-437 14/03/2006 10:30 0.73 <1 <2 5 <1 0.63 MPR-437 21/03/2006 9:37 0.7 <1 4 6 <1 0.37 MPR-437 28/03/2006 9:55 0.8 <1 <2 2 <1 0.44 MPR-437 04/04/2006 9:35 0.93 <1 <2 7 <1 0.44 MPR437 11/04/2006 10:10 0.56 1 <1 <2 3 <1 0.4 MPR-437 18/04/2006 9:40 0.71 <1 <2 8 <1 0.51 MPR-437 26/04/2006 10:00 0.85 <1 <2 4 <1 0.38 MPR-437 02/05/2006 10:20 0.51 <1 10 5 <1 0.38 MPR437 09/05/2006 9:25 0.73 <1 <2 10 <1 0.41 MPR437 16/05/2006 10:40 0.95 <1 <2 6 <1 0.37 MPR-437 23/05/2006 9:55 0.65 <1 6 7 <1 0.35 MPR-437 30/05/2006 9:20 0.6 <1 <2 6 <1 0.48 MPR-437 06/06/2006 10:00 0.55 <1 8 13 <1 0.41 MPR437 13/06/2006 9:32 0.55 <1 <2 13 <1 0.37 MPR-437 20/06/2006 10:40 0.75 <1 <2 13 <1 0.87 MPR-437 27/06/2006 10:10 0.94 <1 <2 15 <1 0.38 MPR-437 04/07/2006 11:03 0.77 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33 MPR437 11/07/2006 10:25 0.72 <1 2 15 <1 0.31 MPR437 18/07/2006 10:10 0.74 <1 56 13 <1 0.35 MPR-437 25/07/2006 11:02 0.57 <1 <2 10 1 <1 0.37 MPR-437 01/08/20069:28 0.98 <1 <2 11 <1 0.34 MPR-437 08/08/2006 9:30 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.39 MPR-437 15/08/2006 9:50 0.84 <1 - <2 17 <1 0.27 MPR-437 22/08/2006 10:20 0.44 <1 14 12 <1 0.37 MPR437 29/08/2006 10:09 0.86 <1 <2 13 1 <1 1 0.36 Page B9 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL2 mgIL Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR437 05/09/2006 10:25 0.52 <1 <2 18 <1 0.38 MPR437 12/09/2006 9:48 0.72 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24 MPR437 19/09/2006 10:35 0.56 <1 2 16 <1 0.24 MPR437 26/09/2006 11:15 0.94 <1 <2 16 <1 0.35 MPR437 03/10/2006 11:17 0.57 <1 <2 15 <1 0.32 MPR437 10/10/2006 11:50 0.69 <1 2 14 <1 0.65 MPR-437 17/10/2006 9:51 0.76 <1 2 14 <1 0.36 MPR-437 24/10/2006 11:48 0.7 <1 <2 13 <1 0.3 MPR437 07/11/2006 10:26 0.61 <1 <2 11 <1 1.2 MPR-437 14/11/2006 11:40 0.73 <1 <2 10 <1 1 MPR-437 21/11/2006 11:55 0.59 <1 <2 9 <1 1 MPR437 05/12/2006 12:38 0.83 <1 <2 6 <1 2.4 MPR437 12/12/2006 11:05 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 1.2 MPR437 19/12/2006 10:48 0.73 <1 <2 7 <1 1.1 MPR437 27/12/2006 10:10 0.99 <1 6 <1 1.3 MPR438 03/01/2006 10:45 0.71 <1 2 2 <1 1.3 MPR-438 10/01/2006 10:38 0.52 <1 2 8 <1 5.1 MPR438 17/01/2006 10:25 0.71 <1 <2 3 <1 0.75 MPR-438 24/01/2006 11:07 0.46 <1 2 8 <1 0.51 MPR-438 31/01/2006 10:50 0.82 <1 <2 1 <1 0.46 MPR438 07/02/2006 10:48 0.98 <1 <2 8 <1 0.4 MPR438 14/02/2006 10:35 0.9 <1 <2 1 <1 0.34 MPR438 21/02/2006 11:03 0.68 <1 <2 6 <1 0.47 MPR-438 28/02/2006 9:50 0.74 <1 2 7 <1 0.43 MPR-438 07/03/2006 10:03 0.6 <1 <2 7 <1 0.46 MPR-438 14/03/2006 10:15 0.4 <1 8 6 <1 0.62 MPR-438 21/03/2006 9:58 0.42 <1 6 7 <1 0.49 MPR-438 28/03/2006 9:35 0.65 <1 <2 2 <1 0.49 MPR-438 04/04/2006 9:57 0.5 <1 <2 8 <1 0.54 MPR438 11/04/20069:50 0.74 <1 <2 3 <1 0.36 MPR-438 18/04/2006 10:00 0.59 <1 <2 9 <1 0.47 MPR438 26/04/2006 9:45 0.65 <1 <2 4 <1 0.47 MPR438 02/05/2006 10:05 0.55 <1 <2 5 <1 0.49 MPR438 09/05/2006 9:55 0.62 <1 <2 10 <1 0.49 MPR438 16/05/2006 10:20 0.43 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32 MPR-438 23/05/2006 9:40 0.55 <1 <2 8 <1 0.38 MPR-438 30/05/2006 9:40 0.41 <1 4 7 <1 0.5 MPR438 06/06/2006 9:40 0.44 <1 4 13 <1 0.47 MPR438 13/06/2006 9:52 0.15 <1 6 13 <1 0.42 MPR438 20/06/2006 10:20 0.5 <1 4 13 <1 0.34 MPR-438 27/06/2006 9:50 0.69 <1 <2 14 <1 0.41 MPR438 04/07/2006 10:48 0.42 <1 22 9 <1 0.4 Page BlO District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL2 mgIL Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR438 11/07/2006 10:05 0.47 <1 130 15 <1 2.4 MPR-438 18/07/2006 9:55 0.47 <1 38 14 <1 0.35 MPR438 25/07/2006 10:44 0.36 <1 4 11 <1 0.33 MPR-438 01/08/20069:48 0.21 <1 76 11 <1 0.33 MPR438 08/08/2006 9:50 0.12 <1 1 <2 11 <1 0.4 MPR438 15/08/2006 9:40 0.15 <1 62 17 <1 0.29 MPR438 22/08/2006 10:00 0.17 <1 2 12 <1 0.59 MPR438 29/08/2006 9:50 0.46 <1 4 13 <1 0.43 MPR-438 05/09/2006 10:05 0.51 <1 2 17 <1 0.34 MPR-438 12/09/2006 10:08 0.5 <1 <2 12 <1 0.28 MPR-438 19/09/2006 10:15 0.29 <1 <2 16 <1 0.3 MPR-438 26/09/2006 10:50 0.49 .<1 4 16 <1 0.58 MPR-438 03/10/2006 10:57 0.17 <1 8 15 <1 0.53 MPR-438 10/10/2006 11:30 0.57 <1 4 15 <1 0.55 MPR438 17/10/2006 10:14 0.21 <1 <2 14 <1 0.3 MPR-438 24/10/2006 11:38 0.46 <1 <2 13 <1 0.35 MPR438 07/11/2006 10:46 0.58 <1 <2 11 <1 0.87 MPR-438 14/11/2006 11:20 0.2 <1 <2 10 <1 0.96 MPR-438 21/11/2006 11:35 0.27 <1 <2 10 <1 1.1 MPR-438 05/12/2006 12:19 0.63 <1 <2 7 <1 2.9 MPR-438 12/12/2006 10:50 0.82 <1 <2 7 <1 1.3 MPR-438 19/12/2006 11:08 0.42 <1 2 7 <1 1.1 MPR-438 27/12/2006 9:50 0.29 <1 6 <1 1.1 MPR-439 03/01/2006 10:55 0.96 <1 <2 2 <1 1.1 MPR-439 10/01/2006 10:32 0.5 <1 <2 7 <1 0.85 MPR439 17/01/2006 10:45 0.91 <1 <2 2 <1 0.82 MPR-439 24/01/2006 10:57 0.86 <1 <2 8 <1 0.61 MPR439 31/01/2006 10:55 0.75 1 <1 6 2 <1 0.41 MPR439 07/02/2006 10:38 1.1 <1 2 8 <1 0.38 MPR-439 14/02/2006 10:50 0.7 <1 LA 1 <1 0.32 MPR-439 21/02/2006 10:55 0.46 <1 <2 5 <1 0.59 MPR-439 28/02/2006 10:00 0.63 <1 <2 6 <1 0.48 MPR-439 07/03/2006 9:53 0.69 <1 8 6 <1 0.5 MPR-439 14/03/2006 10:30 0.31 <1 <2 6 <1 0.89 MPR-439 21/03/2006 9:47 0.7 <1 2 6 <1 1.3 MPR-439 28/03/2006 9:45 0.75 <1 <2 2 <1 0.48 MPR-439 04/04/2006 9:47 0.71 <1 <2 8 <1 0.58 MPR439 11/04/2006 10:00 0.61 <1 2 3 <1 0.43 MPR-439 18/04/2006 9:50 0.69 <1 <2 8 <1 0.44 MPR-439 1 26/04/2006 9:50 1 0.51 <1 <2 4 <1 0.77 MPR-439 02/05/2006 10:15 0.44 <1 2 5 <1 0.4 MPR439 09/05/2006 9:38 0.36 <1 <2 10 <1 0.37 Page Bil District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL1 mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-439 16/05/2006 10:30 0.54 <1 2 6 <1 0.59 MPR-439 23/05/2006 9:50 0.51 <1 <2 8 <1 0.43 MPR439 30/05/2006 9:30 0.26 <1 <2 7 <1 0.39 MPR-439 06/06/2006 9:50 0.28 <1 16 13 <1 0.49 MPR-439 1 13/06/2006 9:42 0.14 <1 <2 14 <1 0.38 MPR-439 20/06/2006 10:30 0.2 <1 <2 13 <1 0.43 MPR-439 27/06/2006 10:00 0.59 <1 2 14 <1 0.4 MPR-439 04/07/2006 10:54 0.13 <1 12 10 <1 0.51 MPR-439 11/07/2006 10:15 1.6 <1 6 15 <1 0.3 MPR-439 18/07/2006 10:05 0.37 <1 8 15 <1 0.39 MPR439 25/07/2006 10:54 0.3 <1 2 12 <1 0.3 MPR-439 01/08/2006 9:38 0.88 <1 2 12 <1 0.31 MPR-439 08/08/20069:40 0.11 <1 4 12 <1 0.48 MPR-439 15/08/2006 9:45 0.03 <1 2 17 <1 0.29 MPR-439 22/08/2006 10:15 0.15 <1 <2 13 <1 0.59 MPR-439 29/08/2006 10:00 0.28 <1 <2 12 <1 0.43 MPR-439 05/09/2006 10:15 0.3 <1 12 18 <1 0.33 MPR439 12/09/2006 9:58 0.37 <1 4 12 <1 0.27 MPR-439 19/09/2006 10:25 0.01 <1 <2 16 <1 0.31 MPR-439 26/09/2006 11:00 0.21 <1 <2 16 <1 0.44 MPR-439 03/10/2006 11:07 0.13 <1 <2 15 <1 0.52 MPR-439 1 10/10/2006 11:40 0.27 <1 <2 15 <1 7.4 MPR-439 17/10/2006 10:06 1 <1 <2 14 <1 0.37 MPR-439 24/10/2006 11:30 0.27 <1 2 13 <1 0.33 MPR-439 07/11/2006 10:36 0.05 <1 <2 11 <1 0.81 MPR-439 14/11/2006 11:30 0.79 <1 2 10 <1 0.86 MPR-439 21/11/2006 11:45 0.05 <1 <2 9 <1 1.2 MPR-439 05/12/2006 12:28 0.23 <1 <2 6 <1 1.6 MPR-439 12/12/2006 10:55 0.81 <1 <2 6 <1 1.3 MPR-439 19/12/2006 10:58 0.22 <1 <2 7 <1 1.2 MPR439 27/12/2006 10:00 0.49 <1 6 <1 1.1 MPR-440 03/01/2006 9:45 1 <1 2 2 <1 1.5 MPR-440 10/01/2006 9:40 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 1.1 MPR-440 17/01/2006 9:35 0.87 <1 <2 2 <1 0.53 MPR440 24/01/2006 9:48 0.75 <1 <2 7 <1 0.37 MPR-440 3 1/01/2006 9:50 0.92 <1 6 1 <1 0.39 MPR-440 07/02/2006 9:43 0.94 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3 MPR-440 14/02/2006 9:35 0.85 <1 LA 1 <1 0.33 MPR-440 21/02/2006 9:49 0.72 <1 2 5 <1 0.48 MPR-440 28/02/2006 8:40 0.87 <1 <2 5 <1 0.39 MPR-440 07/03/2006 8:53 0.58 <1 8 6 <1 0.52 MPR-440 1 14/03/2006 9:30 0.55 <1 2 1 <1 1 0.54 Page B12 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL, mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-440 21/03/2006 9:00 0.63 <1 <2 6 <1 0.35 MPR-440 28/03/2006 8:40 0.76 <1 <2 1 <1 0.49 MPR-440 04/04/2006 8:50 0.74 <1 <2 8 <1 0.38 MPR-440 11/04/2006 8:50 0.58 <1 2 3 <1 0.36 MPR440 18/04/2006 8:53 0.73 <1 <2 7 <1 0.59 MPR-440 26/04/2006 8:45 0.58 <1 <2 5 <1 0.52 MPR-440 02/05/2006 8:45 0.51 <1 2 4 <1 0.42 MPR-440 09/05/2006 9:00 1 0.83 <1 <2 9 <1 0.49 MPR-440 16/05/2006 8:55 0.74 <1 <2 6 <1 0.38 MPR-440 23/05/2006 8:40 0.55 <1 4 7 <1 0.38 MPR-440 30/05/2006 8:40 0.93 <1 4 5 <1 0.48 MPR-440 06/06/2006 8:35 0.68 <1 6 12 <1 0.51 MPR-440 13/06/2006 8:43 0.47 <1 <2 13 <1 0.39 MPR440 20/06/2006 9:00 1 <1 4 13 <1 0.41 MPR-440 27/06/2006 8:55 1.1 <1 <2 13 <1 0.3 MPR-440 04/07/2006 8:42 0.93 <1 <2 8 <1 0.29 MPR-440 11/07/2006 8:35 0.71 <1 2 15 <1 0.28 MPR-440 18/07/2006 8:35 0.85 <1 6 15 <1 0.31 MPR-440 25/07/2006 8:45 0.94 <1 <2 1 10 <1 0.29 MPR-440 01/08/2006 8:45 0.96 <1 4 12 <1 0.31 MPR-440 08/08/2006 8:45 1.2 <1 8 12 <1 0.42 MPR-440 15/08/2006 8:40 1 <1 <2 17 <1 0.26 MPR-440 22/08/2006 8:20 1.2 <1 <2 13 <1 0.37 MPR-440 29/08/2006 8:28 1.2 1 <1 6 12 <1 0.45 MPR-440 05/09/2006 8:40 0.99 <1 <2 17 <1 0.31 MPR440 12/09/2006 8:58 0.9 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25 1\4PR-440 19/09/2006 8:45 0.69 <1 6 17 <1 0.25 MPR-440 26/09/2006 9:10 0.39 <1 2 17 <1 0.46 MPR-440 03/10/2006 8:58 0.75 <1 <2 16 <1 0.35 MPR-440 10/10/2006 9:50 0.9 <1 <2 15 <1 1.7 MPR-440 17/10/20069:39 0.99 <1 <2 15 <1 0.4 MPR-440 24/10/2006 9:45 0.75 <1 <2 14 <1 0.32 MPR-440 07/11/2006 8:20 0.98 <1 <2 10 <1 1.7 MPR-440 14/11/2006 8:18 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.89 MPR-440 21/11/20068:30 0.76 <1 <2 9 <1 1.5 MPR-440 05/12/2006 9:18 1.1 <1 2 6 <1 1.7 MPR-440 12/12/2006 9:30 0.74 <1 2 7 <1 1.1 MPR-440 19/12/2006 9:58 0.94 <1 <2 7 <1 MPR-440 27/12/2006 8:30 0.78 <1 6 <1 1.1 MPR-441 03/01/2006 8:40 0.77 <1 36 2 <1 1.2 MPR-441 10/01/2006 8:55 0.8 <1 <2 7 <1 1.3 MPR-441 17/01/2006 8:35 0.51 <1 <2 3 <1 0.76 Page B13 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL2 mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOniL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-441 24/01/2006 8:58 0.65 <1 <2 7 <1 0.39 MPR-441 3 1/01/2006 8:40 0.73 <1 <2 2 <1 0.59 MPR-441 07/02/2006 8:53 0.87 <1 <2 7 <1 . 0.53 MPR-441 14/02/2006 8:45 0.85 <1 <2 <0.5 <1 0.43 MPR-441 21/02/2006 8:58 0.55 <1 <2 5 <1 0.46 MPR-441 28/02/2006 7:55 0.67 <1 <2 5 <1 0.51 MPR-441 07/03/2006 8:08 0.54 <1 <2 7 <1 0.47 MPR-441 14/03/2006 8:00 0.36 <1 2 1 <1 0.82 MPR-441 2 1/03/2006 8:05 0.68 <1 2 7 <1 0.37 MPR-441 28/03/2006 7:45 0.61 <1 <2 2 <1 0.36 MPR-441 04/04/2006 7:58 0.52 <1 <2 8 <1 0.42 MPR-441 11/04/2006 7:55 0.16 <1 6 4 <1 0.36 MPR-441 18/04/2006 7:55 0.46 <1 <2 9 <1 0.45 MPR-441 26/04/2006 7:45 0.32 <1 <2 4 <1 0.5 MPR-441 02/05/2006 7:45 0.56 <1 10 5 <1 0.31 MPR-441 09/05/2006 7:53 0.33 <1 2 11 <1 0.35 MPR-441 16/05/2006 7:55 0.58 <1 6 6 <1 0.56 MPR-441 23/05/2006 7:45 0.28 <1 2 8 <1 0.34 MPR-441 30/05/2006 7:50 0.49 <1 <2 8 <1 0.42 MPR-441 06/06/2006 7:40 0.44 <1 14 14 <1 0.44 MPR-441 13/06/2006 7:54 0.19 <1 <2 15 <1 0.55 MPR-441 20/06/2006 8:00 0.72 <1 <2 14 <1 0.33 MPR-441 27/06/2006 7:45 0.69 <1 <2 15 <1 0.56 MPR-441 04/07/2006 7:52 0.66 <1 <2 11 <1 0.37 MPR-441 11/07/2006 7:40 0.45 <1 <2 17 <1 0.3 MPR-441 18/07/2006 7:40 0.58 <1 2 17 <1 0.28 MPR-441 25/07/2006 7:50 0.79 <1 4 13 <1 0.3 MPR-441 01/08/2006 7:55 0.67 <1 2 13 <1 0.39 MPR-441 08/08/2006 7:57 0.77 <1 2 13 <1 0.4 MPR-441 15/08/2006 7:40 0.72 <1 <2 18 <1 0.33 MPR-441 22/08/2006 7:35 0.73 <1 <2 12 <1 0.61 MPR-441 29/08/2006 7:21 1 <1 <2 14 <1 0.31 MPR-441 05/09/2006 7:40 0.69 <1 <2 18 <1 0.3 MPR-441 12/09/2006 7:35 0.83 <1 6 13 <1 0.2 MPR-441 19/09/2006 7:40 0.65 <1 <2 16 <1 0.28 MPR-441 26/09/2006 8:00 0.7 <1 <2 17 <1 0.22 MPR-441 03/10/2006 7:58 0.6 <1 <2 16 <1 0.35 MPR-441 10/10/2006 8:50 0.45 <1 4 14 <1 0.24 MPR-441 17/10/2006 8:47 0.61 <1 <2 14 <1 0.36 MPR-441 24/10/2006 8:45 0.63 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26 MPR-441 07/1 1/2006 9:02 0.46 <1 <2 11 <1 1.1 MPR-441 14/11/20069:00 0.67 <1 1 <2 10 <1 0.89 Page B14 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL2 mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-441 21/11/20069:08 0.67 <1 <2 10 <1 MPR-441 05/12/2006 9:38 0.83 <1 2 6 <1 2.5 MPR-441 12/12/2006 8:35 0.81 <1 <2 6 <1 MPR441 19/12/2006 9:10 0.66 <1 <2 7 <1 0.92 MPR-441 27/12/2006 7:35 0.85 <1 6 <1 0.91 MPR-442 03/01/2006 9:25 0.88 <1 <2 1 <1 1.3 MPR-442 10/01/2006 9:26 0.95 <1 <2 7 <1 0.93 MPR-442 17/01/2006 9:15 0.79 <1 2 3 <1 0.57 MPR-442 24/01/2006 9:30 0.84 <1 <2 8 <1 0.39 MPR-442 31/01/2006 9:35 0.75 <1 <2 2 <1 0.32 MPR-442 07/02/2006 9:28 0.91 <1 4 7 <1 0.34 MPR-442 14/02/2006 9:20 0.86 <1 <2 1 <1 0.32 MPR-442 21/02/20069:30 0.77 <1 2 6 <1 0.36 MPR-442 28/02/2006 8:20 0.83 <1 <2 7 <1 0.37 MPR-442 07/03/2006 8:35 0.64 <1 2 7 <1 0.37 MPR-442 14/03/2006 8:45 0.67 <1 2 1 <1 0.46 MPR-442 2 1/03/2006 8:39 0.65 <1 <2 7 <1 0.43 MPR-442 1 28/03/2006 8:30 0.75 1 <1 2 3 <1 0.74 MPR-442 04/04/2006 8:32 0.71 <1 <2 8 <1 0.41 MPR-442 11/04/2006 8:30 0.8 <1 2 3 <1 0.35 MPR-442 18/04/2006 8:34 0.86 <1 <2 8 <1 0.52 MPR-442 26/04/2006 8:30 0.74 <1 14 4 <1 0.38 MPR-442 02/05/2006 8:25 0.64 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR-442 09/05/2006 8:40 0.61 <1 1 <2 10 <1 0.37 MPR-442 16/05/2006 8:35 0.73 <1 2 6 <1 0.32 MPR-442 23/05/2006 8:25 0.69 <1 <2 7 <1 0.36 MPR-442 30/05/2006 8:23 0.71 <1 <2 7 <1 0.4 MPR-442 06/06/2006 8:15 0.69 <1 4 12 <1 0.4 MPR-442 J 13/06/2006 8:24 0.65 <1 <2 13 <1 0.37 MPR-442 20/06/2006 8:45 0.85 <1 <2 1 13 <1 0.38 MPR-442 27/06/2006 8:35 0.88 <1 <2 14 <1 0.32 MPR-442 04/07/2006 8:23 0.96 <1 4 9 <1 0.37 MPR-442 11/07/2006 8:20 0.68 <1 <2 15 <1 0.27 MPR-442 18/07/2006 8:20 0.6 <1 <2 15 <1 0.37 MPR-442 25/07/2006 8:25 0.87 <1 8 11 <1 0.25 MPR-442 01/08/2006 8:28 0.87 <1 10 12 <1 0.53 MPR-442 08/08/2006 8:27 0.9 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35 MPR-442 15/08/2006 8:25 0.86 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24 MPR-442 22/08/2006 8:05 0.92 <1 2 12 <1 0.47 MPR-442 29/08/2006 7:49 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33 MPR-442 05/09/2006 8:25 0.8 <1 <2 18 <1 0.24 MPR-442 12/09/2006 8:35 0.95 <1 2 12 <1 0.28 Page B15 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL, mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-442 19/09/2006 8:25 0.85 <1 4 17 <1 0.25 MPR-442 26/09/2006 8:45 0.89 <1 <2 17 <1 0.27 MPR-442 03/10/2006 8:39 0.91 <1 140 16 <1 1.1 MPR-442 10/10/2006 9:30 0.85 <1 10 15 <1 0.36 MPR-442 17/10/2006 9:24 0.88 <1 <2 15 <1 0.33 MPR-442 24/10/2006 9:27 0.96 <1 <2 14 <1 0.28 MPR442 07/1 1/2006 9:38 0.9 <1 <2 11 <1 1.1 MPR-442 14/11/20069:30 1.1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.9 MPR442 21/11/20069:45 0.79 <1 <2 9 <1 1.1 MPR-442 05/12/2006 10:30 1.1 <1 <2 8 <1 2.2 MPR-442 12/12/2006 9:15 1 <1 <2 7 <1 1.1 MPR-442 19/12/2006 9:43 1.1 <1 <2 7 <1 1.1 MPR-442 27/12/2006 8:10 0.78 <1 7 <1 0.94 MPR-443 03/01/2006 9:00 1.1 <1 8 1 <1 1.4 MPR-443 10/01/2006 9:03 1.1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.68 MPR-443 17/01/2006 9:05 0.77 <1 4 3 <1 0.69 MPR-443 24/01/2006 9:08 0.88 <1 <2 7 <1 0.39 MPR-443 31/01/2006 9:10 0.83 <1 <2 3 <1 0.36 MPR-443 07/02/2006 9:03 1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32 MPR-443 14/02/2006 9:00 0.89 <1 <2 1 <1 0.48 MPR-443 21/02/2006 9:10 0.7 <1 2 6 <1 0.36 MPR-443 28/02/2006 8:05 0.81 <1 <2 7 <1 0.41 MPR-443 07/03/2006 8:16 0.73 <1 <2 7 <1 0.55 MPR-443 14/03/2006 8:30 0.61 <1 <2 1 <1 0.41 MPR-443 21/03/2006 8:15 0.91 <1 2 7 <1 0.36 MPR443 28/03/2006 8:10 0.66 <1 2 2 <1 0.47 MPR443 04/04/2006 8:08 0.76 <1 2 8 <1 0.4 MPR-443 11/04/2006 8:05 0.75 <1 <2 3 <1 0.38 MPR-443 18/04/2006 8:10 0.85 <1 <2 9 <1 0.52 MPR443 26/04/2006 8:05 0.72 <1 2 5 <1 0.52 MPR-443 02/05/2006 8:05 0.58 <1 24 5 <1 0.32 MPR-443 09/05/2006 8:02 0.84 <1 <2 10 <1 0.44 MPR-443 16/05/2006 8:15 0.74 <1 <2 6 <1 0.45 MPR-443 23/05/2006 8:05 0.69 <1 4 8 <1 0.38 MPR-443 30/05/2006 8:00 0.87 <1 <2 6 <1 0.39 MPR-443 06/06/2006 7:55 0.67 <1 46 12 <1 0.54 MPR443 13/06/2006 8:04 0.44 <1 8 13 <1 0.57 MPR-443 20/06/2006 8:15 0.99 <1 2 13 <1 0.79 MPR-443 27/06/2006 8:10 1 <1 2 14 <1 0.31 MPR-443 04/07/2006 8:02 0.78 <1 <2 10 <1 0.36 MPR-443 1 11/07/20067:55 0.76 <1 <2 15 <1 0.33 MPR-443 1 18/07/2006 8:00 0.78 <1 <2 14 <1 0.37 Page B16 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL2 mgIL Fecal Coliforms MFI100mL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-443 25/07/2006 8:00 0.93 <1 <2 12 <1 0.28 MPR-443 01/08/2006 8:05 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.36 MPR-443 08/08/2006 8:07 1.1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.37 MPR-443 15/08/2006 8:00 0.95 <1 <2 17 <1 0.32 MPR-443 22/08/2006 7:40 0.95 <1 <2 13 <1 0.43 MPR-443 29/08/2006 7:29 1 <1 2 12 <1 0.34 MPR-443 05/09/2006 8:00 0.95 <1 <2 18 <1 0.35 MPR-443 12/09/2006 8:10 0.98 <1 <2 13 <1 0.35 MPR-443 19/09/2006 8:00 0.89 <1 <2 17 <1 0.28 MPR-443 26/09/2006 8:20 0.87 <1 2 17 <1 0.28 MPR-443 03/10/2006 8:09 0.85 <1 <2 16 <1 0.37 MPR443 10/10/2006 9:10 0.97 <1 <2 15 <1 0.38 MPR443 17/10/2006 8:57 0.96 <1 <2 14 <1 0.43 MPR-443 24/10/2006 9:05 0.96 <1 20 14 <1 0.33 MPR-443 07/1 1/2006 9:18 0.91 <1 <2 11 <1 1.3 MPR443 14/1 1/2006 9:12 1.2 <1 <2 10 <1 0.92 MPR-443 21/11/20069:18 0.89 <1 <2 9 <1 1.2 MPR-443 05/12/2006 9:48 1 <1 <2 6 <1 2.2 MPR-443 12/12/2006 8;55 1.3 <1 <2 6 <1 1.1 MPR-443 19/12/2006 9:20 1.1 <1 <2 7 <1 MPR443 27/12/2006 7:55 1.2 <1 6 <1 1 MPR-444 03/01/2006 8:30 0.67 <1 <2 2 <1 1.3 MPR-444 10/01/2006 8:44 0.42 <1 2 7 <1 1.1 MPR-444 17/01/2006 8:25 0.5 <1 2 2 <1 0.58 MPR-444 24/01/2006 8:48 0.58 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34 MPR-444 31/01/2006 8:30 1.5 <1 14 2 <1 0.35 MPR-444 07/02/2006 8:45 0.72 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34 MPR-444 14/02/2006 8:30 0.63 <1 <2 1 <1 0.31 MPR-444 2 1/02/2006 8:48 0.38 <1 <2 5 <1 0.48 MPR-444 28/02/2006 7:50 0.34 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR-444 07/03/2006 7:58 0.21 <1 <2 7 <1 0.42 MPR-444 j 14/03/2006 7:45 0.4 <1 2 1 1<1 0.51 MPR-444 21/03/2006 7:53 0.41 <1 <2 6 <1 0.4 MPR-444 28/03/2006 7:25 0.45 <1 <2 2 <1 0.4 MPR-444 04/04/2006 7:48 0.43 <1 <2 7 <1 0.47 MPR-444 11/04/2006 7:35 0.25 <1 2 3 <1 0.32 MPR444 18/04/2006 7:47 0.36 <1 <2 8 <1 0.5 MPR-444 26/04/2006 7:20 0.23 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36 MPR-444 02/05/2006 7:30 0.32 <1 <2 4 <1 0.38 MPR-444 09/05/2006 7:43 0.51 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.32 MPR-444 16/05/2006 7:40 0.54 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR-444 23/05/2006 7:25 0.33 <1 <2 8 <1 0.35 Page B17 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL2 mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-444 30/05/2006 7:40 0.46 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32 MPR-444 06/06/2006 7:20 0.36 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35 MPR-444 13/06/2006 7:42 0.29 <1 2 13 <1 0.33 MPR-444 20/06/2006 7:40 0.41 <1 <2 13 <1 0.35 MPR-444 27/06/2006 7:25 0.67 <1 <2 14 <1 0.37 MPR-444 04/07/2006 7:40 0.66 <1 <2 9 <1 0.29 MPR-444 11/07/2006 7:25 0.5 <1 <2 16 <1 0.29 MPR-444 18/07/2006 7:25 0.45 <1 <2 15 <1 0.24 MPR-444 25/07/2006 7:38 0.67 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33 MPR-444 01/08/2006 7:45 0.58 <1 4 13 <1 0.22 MPR-444 08/08/2006 7:47 0.84 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35 MPR-444 15/08/2006 7:20 0.77 <1 <2 18 <1 0.25 MPR-444 22/08/2006 10:48 0.73 <1 <2 NA <1 0.45 MPR-444 29/08/2006 7:12 1.5 <1 <2 14 <1 0.29 MPR-444 05/09/2006 7:20 0.74 <1 <2 18 <1 0.22 MPR-444 12/09/2006 7:45 0.81 <1 <2 13 <1 0.19 MPR-444 19/09/2006 7:20 0.33 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23 MPR-444 26/09/2006 7:45 1 <1 4 16 <1 2.9 MPR-444 03/10/2006 7:48 0.75 <1 <2 16 <1 0.22 MPR-444 10/10/2006 8:40 0.87 <1 2 15 <1 2.2 MPR-444 17/10/2006 8:35 0.57 <1 <2 14 <1 0.32 MPR-444 24/10/2006 8:37 0.68 <1 <2 13 <1 0.22 MPR-444 07/11/2006 8:52 1.1 <1 <2 11 <1 0.91 MPR-444 14/11/2006 8:49 0.66 <1 <2 10 <1 1.2 MPR-444 21/11/2006 9:00 0.52 <1 <2 9 <1 1.2 MPR-444 05/12/2006 8:47 0.77 <1 <2 6 <1 1.2 MPR-444 12/12/2006 8:15 0.82 <1 <2 6 <1 1 MPR-444 19/12/2006 9:00 0.81 <1 <2 6 <1 MPR-444 27/12/2006 7:10 0.52 <1 5 <1 1.1 MPR-445 03/01/2006 10:35 0.21 <1 20 1 <1 0.77 MPR-445 10/01/2006 10:47 0.05 <1 1100 8 <1 1.1 MPR-445 17/01/2006 10:15 0.04 <1 370 2 <1 0.58 MPR-445 24/01/2006 11:17 0.14 <1 <2 8 <1 0.44 MPR-445 31/01/2006 10:40 0.86 <1 <2 2 <1 0.43 MPR-445 07/02/2006 10:58 0.95 <1 <2 8 <1 0.35 MPR445 14/02/2006 10:30 0.56 <1 2 <0.5 <1 0.33 MPR-445 21/02/2006 11:17 0.57 <1 <2 6 <1 0.59 MPR445 28/02/2006 9:40 0.76 <1 <2 7 <1 0.39 MPR-445 07/03/2006 10:11 0.53 <1 8 7 <1 0.53 MPR-445 14/03/2006 10:10 0.46 <1 <2 6 <1 0.52 MPR-445 21/03/2006 10:08 0.28 <1 12 .6 <1 0.65 MPR-445 28/03/2006 9:25 0.41 <1 1 <2 1 2 <1 1 0.85 Page B18 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL, mgTL Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-445 04/04/2006 10:07 0.46 <1 <2 8 <1 0.5 MPR-445 11/04/2006 9:40 0.49 <1 <2 2 <1 0.63 MPR-445 18/04/2006 10:10 0.09 <1 82 9 <1 0.44 MPR-445 26/04/2006 9:35 0.32 <1 4 3 <1 0.53 MPR-445 02/05/2006 9:55 0.48 <1 2 5 <1 1 0.83 MPR-445 09/05/2006 10:06 0.34 <1 <2 11 <1 0.56 MPR-445 16/05/2006 10:10 0.44 <1 <2 6 <1 0.76 MPR-445 23/05/2006 9:30 0.16 <1 8 7 <1 0.36 MPR-445 30/05/2006 9:55 0.39 <1 62 7 <1 6.3 MPR-445 06/06/2006 9:25 0.02 <1 5700 12 <1 0.38 MPR-445 13/06/2006 10:13 0.07 <1 50 14 <1 1.1 MPR-445 20/06/2006 10:10 0.06 <1 3900 13 <1 0.29 MPR-445 27/06/2006 9:40 0.09 <1 4 14 <1 0.38 MPR-445 04/07/2006 10:39 0.11 <1 190 10 <1 0.28 MPR-445 11/07/20069:55 0.26 <1 <2 15 <1 0.28 MPR-445 18/07/2006 9:45 0.17 <1 530 15 <1 0.28 MPR-445 25/07/2006 10:34 0.11 <1 300 12 <1 0.33 MPR-445 01/08/2006 9:58 0.21 <1 370 13 <1 0.28 MPR-445 08/08/2006 10:00 0.38 <1 2 12 <1 0.29 MPR-445 15/08/2006 9:2 1 0.7 <1 <2 18 <1 0.24 MPR-445 22/08/20069:45 0.11 <1 12 12 <1 0.34 I MPR-445 29/08/2006 9:40 0.36 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.31 MPR-445 05/09/2006 9:55 0.68 <1 2 16 <1 0.26 MPR-445 12/09/2006 10:28 0.78 <1 <2 12 <1 0.2 MPR-445 19/09/2006 10:05 0.24 <1 <2 16 <1 0.21 MPR-445 26/09/2006 10:40 0.11 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23 MPR-445 03/10/2006 10:47 0.24 <1 <2 15 <1 0.26 MPR-445 10/10/2006 11:20 0.03 <1 40 15 <1 0.34 MPR-445 17/10/2006 10:35 0.25 <1 <2 14 <1 0.3 MPR-445 24/10/2006 11:20 0.31 <1 <2 1 13 <1 0.37 MPR445 07/11/2006 10:57 <0.01 <1 42 12 <1 0.37 MPR-445 14/11/2006 11:10 0.04 <1 <2 11 <1 0.57 MPR-445 21/11/2006 11:25 0.59 <1 2 10 <1 0.93 MPR-445 05/12/2006 12:06 0.18 <1 <2 8 <1 1.1 MPR-445 12/12/2006 10:35 0.39 <1 <2 7 <1 0.84 MPR-445 19/12/2006 11:18 0.14 <1 2 8 <1 0.81 MPR-445 27/12/2006 9:40 0.82 <1 5 <1 0.99 MPR-446 03/01/2006 10:20 0.61 <1 6 1 <1 0.82 MPR446 10/01/2006 10:57 0.36 <1 2 7 <1 1.3 MPR-446 17/01/2006 10:05 0.79 <1 <2 2 1 <1 - 0.65 MPR-446 24/01112006 11:29 0.54 <1 4 8 <1 0.65 MPR-446 3 1/01/2006 10:20 048 <1 2 1 <1 0.55 Page B19 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Source Date Collected Chlorine Free as CL2 mg/L Fecal Coliforms MF/lOOmL Heterotrophic Plate Count CFU/mLs Temp. °C Total Coliforms MF/lOOmLs Turbidity NTU MPR-446 07/02/2006 11:12 0.6 <1 <2 7 <1 0.55 MPR-446 14/02/2006 10:00 0.64 <1 LA 1 <1 0.44 MPR-446 21/02/2006 11:33 0.73 <1 <2 5 <1 0.58 MPR-446 28/02/2006 9:15 0.46 <1 2 5 <1 0.58 MPR-446 07/03/2006 10:22 0.84 <1 6 6 <1 0.43 MPR-446 14/03/2006 9:50 0.58 <1 4 5 <1 0.52 MPR-446 2 1/03/2006 10:24 0.81 <1 <2 6 <1 0.46 MPR-446 28/03/2006 9:10 0.61 <1 2 2 <1 0.53 MPR-446 04/04/2006 10:22 0.34 <1 <2 6 <1 0.46 MPR-446 11/04/20069:25 0.27 <1 2 2 <1 0.44 MPR-446 18/04/2006 10:20 0.28 <1 4 7 <1 0.38 MPR446 26/04/2006 9:25 0.7 <1 <2 3 <1 0.62 MPR-446 02/05/2006 9:45 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.52 MPR-446 09/05/2006 10:16 0.68 <1 <2 10 <1 0.73 MPR-446 16/05/2006 10:00 0.69 <1 <2 6 <1 0.57 MPR-446 23/05/2006 9:15 0.26 <1 2 7 <1 0.35 MPR-446 30/05/2006 10:10 0.26 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33 MPR-446 06/06/2006 9:15 0.04 <1 280 12 <1 0.41 MPR-446 13/06/2006 10:25 0.17 <1 <2 13 <1 0.46 MPR-446 20/06/2006 10:00 0.18 <1 <2 12 <1 0.45 MPR-446 27/06/2006 9:25 0.69 <1 <2 15 <1 0.32 MPR-446 04/07/2006 10:26 1.1 <1 <2 9 <1 0.48 MPR-446 11/07/20069:40 0.64 <1 4 15 <1 1.2 MPR-446 1 18/07/2006 9:35 0.42 <1 <2 14 <1 4.5 MPR-446 25/07/2006 10:20 1 <1 6 11 <1 0.33 MPR-446 01/08/2006 10:13 0.35 <1 <2 11 <1 0.39 MPR-446 08/08/2006 10:13 0.48 <1 <2 11 <1 0.84 MPR-446 15/08/2006 9:15 0.95 <1 <2 17 <1 0.28 MPR446 22/08/2006 9:36 0.72 <1 <2 10 <1 0.35 MPR-446 29/08/2006 9:30 0.69 <1 2 13 <1 0.4 MPR-446 05/09/2006 9:45 0.6 <1 <2 1 16 <1 0.27 MPR-446 12/09/2006 10:42 0.62 <1 2 11 <1 0.27 MPR-446 19/09/2006 9:50 0.37 <1 2 15 <1 0.34 MPR-446 26/09/2006 10:30 0.6 <1 <2 15 <1 0.44 MPR-446 03/10/2006 10:34 0.38 <1 <2 14 <1 0.27 MPR-446 10/10/2006 11:00 0.48 <1 2 14 <1 0.23 MPR-446 17/10/2006 10:45 0.97 <1 <2 14 <1 0.82 MPR-446 24/10/2006 11:08 0.66 <1 2 12 <1 0.4 MPR-446 07/11/2006 11:09 0.46 <1 <2 10 <1 0.43 MPR-446 14/11/2006 11:00 0.37 <1 <2 9 <1 0.68 MPR-446 21/11/2006 11:15 1.3 <1 2 9 <1 1.2 MPR-446 05/12/2006 11:52 1.8 <1 2 6 <1 1.5 Page B20 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Chlorine Free as Fecal Heterotrophic Total CL2 Coliforms Plate Count Temp. Coliforms Turbidity Source Date Collected mg/L MF/lOOmL CFU/mLs °C MF/l0OmLs NTU MPR-446 12/12/2006 10:30 1.4 <1 <2 6 <1 1.4 MPR-446 19/12/2006 11:32 1.2 <1 <2 6 <1 1.2 MPR-446 27/12/2006 9:30 0.85 <1 5 <1 1.5 Page B21 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 GVWD system sample site and sampling results within Maple Ridge: Site Name Sample Line Location 72 Maple Ridge Pump Sample line is in a chamber. Station Sample Name Sample Description Sampled Date Chlorine Free (mg/L) Ecoli ______ HPC (CFU/mls) Total Coliform (MF/lOOmLs) GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 06/01/2006 10:48 1.2 <1 14 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 11/01/2006 10:11 1 <1 46 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 18/01/2006 10:11 0.9 <1 64 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 25/0 1/2006 9:58 1.2 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 09/02/2006 8:07 0.8 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 15/02/2006 7:25 0.95 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 21/02/2006 7:18 0.52 <1 2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 07/03/2006 6:20 0.62 <1 2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 16/03/2006 12:00 0.77 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 24/03/2006 7:03 0.53 <1 16 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 06/04/2006 7:20 0.62 <1 4 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 11/04/2006 7:12 0.61 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 18/04/2006 7:07 1 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 25/04/2006 6:58 0.66 <1 4 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 04/05/2006 7:23 0.35 <1 74 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 09/05/2006 7:18 0.82 <1 2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 16/05/2006 7:20 0.59 <1 2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 26/05/2006 10:49 1 <1 110 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 3 1/05/2006 6:47 0.54 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 07/06/2006 6:58 0.53 <1 64 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 14/06/2006 7:05 0.7 <1 16 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 20/06/2006 12:48 0.67 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 28/06/2006 7:00 0.97 <1 68 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 06/07/2006 6:55 0.76 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 12/07/2006 6:49 0.97 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 19/07/2006 7:04 0.87 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 24/07/2006 8:02 1.3 <1 4 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 02/08/2006 9:15 1.2 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 04/08/2006 9:34 1.2 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 16/08/2006 7:38 0.84 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 24/08/2006 6:47 0.46 <1 2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 30/08/2006 7:13 0.61 <1 2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 07/09/2006 7:28 0.86 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 14/09/2006 7:16 0.81 <1 6 <1 Page B22 Distñct of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Sample Name Sample Description Sampled Date Chlorine Free (mgIL) Ecoli ______ HPC (CFU/mls) Total Coliform (MF/lOOmLs) GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 27/09/2006 7:20 0.8 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 20/09/2006 6:50 0.76 <1 2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 11/10/2006 7:05 0.78 1 <1 2 <1 GV072 1 Maple Ridge Pump Station 18/10/2006 6:34 0.34 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 27/10/2006 7:38 1.1 <1 2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 3 1/10/2006 6:21 0.73 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 08/11/2006 5:39 0.56 <1 >11000 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 16/11/2006 6:34 0.97 <1 2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 23/11/2006 6:37 1.2 <1 2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 28/11/2006 6:40 0.95 <1 <2 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 06/12/2006 6:06 1.1 <1 6 <1 GV-072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 13/12/2006 5:30 0.69 <1 <2 <1 Page B23 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 APPENDIX C - DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS GVRI) LAB RESULTS Page Cl District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 - - CL - a - a . - - - - - . .- < < . C) o C) C) : C) - ; C) 0 .. C) 0 0 c C E I- i • C - .< .< < .! C- Sampling Date Site Collected DmMPR 434 21-Feb-06 <0.5 21 <1 <15 20 41 0.6 <1 <0.5 23 24 09-May-06 <0.5 16 <1 <15 21 37 0.8 <1 <0.5 19 20 12-Sep-06 <0.5 19 <1 <15 9 28 1 <1 <0.5 17 18 28-Nov-06 <0.5 22 <1 <15 30 52 0.8 <1 <0.5 25 26 DmMPR435 21-Feb-06 <0.5 20 <1 <15 18 38 0.5 <1 <0.5 16 1 17 09-May-06 <0.5 18 <1 <15 25 43 0.8 <1 <0.5 20 21 12-Sep-06 <0.5 26 <1 <15 16 42 1 1 1 <1 <0.5 19 20 28-Nov-06 <0.5 20 <1 <15 28 48 0.8 <1 <0.5 25 26 DmMPR-438 21-Feb-06 <0.5 31 <1 <15 40 71 0.7 <1 <0.5 34 35 09-May-06 <0.5 18 <1 <15 25 43 0.8 <1 1 <0.5 24 25 12-Sep-06 <0.5 15 <1 <15 21 36 1 <1 <0.5 23 24 28-Nov-06 <0.5 13 <1 <15 32 45 0.9 <1 <0.5 26 27 DmMPR-440 21-Feb-06 <0.5 14 <1 <15 10 24 0.4 <1 <0.5 10 10 09-May-06 <0.5 13 <1 <15 15 28 0.5 <1 <0.5 16 17 12-Sep-06 <0.5 28 <1 <15 12 40 1 <1 <0.5 19 20 28-Nov-06 <0.5 13 <1 <15 14 27 0.6 <1 <0.5 13 14 Page C2 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 IT 0 0 N 9 . - 0 = o . 0 - - 0 - 9 9 9 - 4 3 2 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 , 2 no r r- 9 2 2 r- n . r 8. r r Sampled Sample date MPR-432 07103/06 0.11 <0.002 <0.01 0.003 '0 02 '0 0005 1.11 <0.001 <0.001 0.017 0.11 <0.001 0.1 0.004 <0.002 <0.001 <0.01 <0.001 5.1 <0.003 MPR-432 19/12/06 0.004 0.09 <0.001 0.002 MPR-435 07/03/06 0.09 <0.002 <0.01 0.002 .0.02 .0,0005 1.01 <0.001 0.001 0.043 0.06 <0.001 0.1 0.003 <0.002 <0.001 <0.01 <0.001 5 <0.003 MPR-435 09/05/06 7 MPR-435 12/09/06 0.028 0.09 <0.001 0.002 7.2 MPR-435 28/1/06 6.9 MPR-438 09/05/06 7.1 MPR-438 12/09/06 MPR-438 28/11/06 , 6.8 MPR-440 07/03/06 0.09 <0.002 <0.01 0,002 <002 0.0005 1,17 <0.001 <0.001 0.018 0.08 <0.001 0.1 0.003 <0.002 <0.002 <0.01 <0.001 5.... <0.006 MPR440 19/12/06 0.028 0.09 <0.001 0.003 Canadian None 0.006 0.025 1.0 5.0 0005 none 0.05 none 1.0 .3 0.01 50.05 none none None. 0.01 None 00 .0 7.5+1 Guideline l.imlt Page C3 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 APPENDIX D - GVRD COQUITLAM SOURCE TREATED WATER QUALITY Page Dl District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 Physical and Chemical Analysis of Water Supply Greater Vancouver Water District 2006 - Coquitlam Water System Untreated Treated Conudiun kenton Parameter Average Average Rsinge Guideline Guideline Guideline Exceeded jg55 Established Alkul,ott< as CaCO3 (mg/L) 1.0 0.3 6.0 -0.6 none Alunrrmom Drssolved (mg/L) 0.05 006 0.02 - 0.07 none Alursrnrunn Total (mg/L) 0.17 0.21 0.02- 0.07 none Anttrnony Total (nrg'L) <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 0 0.006 health Arsenic Total 1mg/LI <0.02 <0.0! <0.01 0 0.025 health Bartuns Total 1mg/LI 0.003 0.003 0.002 -0.003 0 1.0 health Boron Total 1mg/LI <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0 5.0 health Brotnatc(mg'L) <0.0! <0.01 <0.01 0 0.01 health Broorde (nrg/L) <0.02 <001 <0.02 none Cadmium Total (mg!L) <0,0005 <0.0005 <0.0005 0 0.005 health Calcumn Total (mg/I-) 2.0 1.0 0.9 - 1.1 none Carbon Orgunc Dmsolved (mg/L) 2.4 1.4 0.9- 1.0 none Carson Organc Total (mgiL) 1.4 1.4 0.9 - 1.8 none Chlomnie lnrg'U <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 none Chloride Total (mg/Li 0.6 I 9 2.6-2.4 0 ?250 aestlretmc Chromnmunr Total 1mg/LI <0.001 <0.002 <0.001 II 0.05 health Colon Apparent (ACU) 12 3 2 .9 none Color True (TCU; 9 2 <2 -7 0 'IS aesthetic Conduclivimy (umhosicsr) 9 27 22 - SI none Copper Total trng.'Ll 0.004 <0.002 <0,002 0 71 aestheoc Cvaomdm Total (tnliJLI 0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0 0.2 health Flaorde (tmrg/L) <1105 <0.05 <0.05 0 2.5 health Hardness as CaCO ltng/L) 2.90 207 2.62 -3,17 noon Iron Dssolvmd (tog/L) 0.03 0.03 0.01 - 0.04 noun Iron Total (mg/LI 0.01 0.07 0.04-0,13 II ?0.3 aesthetic Load Total (tog/L) <0.001 <0.002 <0.001 0 0.01 health itagoesmurrr Total (mg/I-) 0.12 0.10 0.09-0.13 ' none Manganese Osnolned 1mg/LI 0.003 0.004 0.002 -0.23 noon Mangaoesn Total 1mg/LI 0.007 0.005 0.003 - 0.007 0 70.05 aesthetic Mercury Total (mg/I.) ' <0.00005 <0,00005 <0.00005 0 0.002 health Nckrl Total 1mg/LI <0.001 0.002 <0.001 noon Nitrogen - Ansmrmn,a an N (mgiL) 0,02 <0,01 <0.02 sate Nitrogen - Nmtrataas N(mgJL) 0.10 0.11 0.06- 0.13 0 20 health Nmtugen - Norms as N (mgI-) <0.02 <001 <0,01 0 1.0 health pH 6.5 7.1 6.6 - 7.9 0 6.5 to 0.5 ansthccc Phenols (mgI-) <0.003 <0.005 -n0.005 none Phosphorus Total mgI-) <0.005 <0,005 <0.005 none PotassmumTomallmng-LI 0.24 0.25 013- 0.25 , nose Rrsdue TOtal (mg'L) 13 24 22.23 soon Resmdue Total Dmsolvrd 1mg/LI 2 23 21 -29 0 3500 aesthetic Resmdum Total Fond 1mg/LI 7 17 15 . (9 none Residue Total Volarlo 1mg/LI 6 6 6-' soon Snienon Total 1mg/LI <0.001 <0001 <0002 0 0.01 health Smhca as SO. mg/LI 2.5 2.5 = -2 none S/cnn Total (mng/L) <0.001 <0.002 00.002 sons Sodmorn Total (mg-L) 0.3 4.5 37.5.1 0 7200 aestheuc Sulphate (mg/Li 0.0 4.5 0.7 .09 0 7500 nesthntmc Tsrhidmmy (NTU( Daily Aoera9c 0.71 07! 029- 4 Turhtdmmy (NTL') Non. 5-27 Daly Avet-tgr 2.5 2.5 1.6- 4.9 21V254 (Abn/cm) 0.056 0.020 0.009 -O.04 none IJV254 App (Abs/cm) 0.065 0.023 5.022 - 0.050 floss Zinc Total ImgL 0.003 0.002 0002-0003 0 75 000theIc rnmefr -es cc average at/yen fern, a camber ofldmcraomy cit/pan dome rhrcacgnc., moeyem Where tIw rageir oiirmgle va'ueocomrmso,on nod meo,srnllto- theaasples orl-<cd Mnhdot md anna me, hanoi on moss, of Smcida,d Me,l,oi, of Wore, and scam, Warer 2lam Edrmao 2003 I-cs mhcam 9-, sbnotco no thnetadd, myrrh the mechorqvc cssifo.-rriners<sc,.o, U,r,nss,,lmycae,- jo/on, ,h,,rmoaep,,er,ochkeresnsr. ,,rs.en4otaeenticsrr vosgl,c.rrmhrGVRDd.srembcmmonoysmnndoemc.s.'rcfelrlunscaoo, (h,,dcl,rrmn r.*,,, (re,, Gardcl,oyr9e Cu,adncs D,,ok,rrg Wore, Qcalc'-S.srr Eds,,or 9/hemS cr4 W00,-r I-rena/c l9Oy ag/carl to Mo-oh 22010 Ccvr,mmloe cca<-e rrcy <sr.votjecsr do i/I ,oFch 15. Cnlcnr no crier iai,n,i, mcmcfcepe,srsr< ds,a,no,cr, e10n-,rr.-Jce'nocerire< thssrJycm,rc,. csdsasrramrmos,c.aor,pFl ndr/0d,c,mc 36 Page D2 Disthct of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 APPENDIX E - 2006-2008 CAPITAL PROGRAM Page El District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 2006 PROJECTS FLETCHER ST (DTR - BROWN) 116 AVE (232 ST - COTTONWOOD DRIVE) 124 AVE @232 ST(P.R.V.) EXETER AVE (SPRING CRES - E/O 216) 104 AVE (240-242) 104 AVE (24300/24400 BLOCK) 110 AVE (240-243) LANE NORTH SELKIRK (223 - 224) LANE S LOUGHEED (223 - 224) LORNE AVE (KINSTON - PRINCESS) OSPRING ST (PRINCESS - ELTHAM) 260 ST(1 18- DTR) TAMARACK LANE (23400 BLOCK) LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - WATER(2006) WATER CONNECTIONS/TIE-INS - 2006 223 ST(119—DTR) 124 AVE (244— 248) LAITY ST (LOUGHEED - DTR) DCC PAYMENT TO JOINT SUPPLY SYSTEM, 2006 WATER NETWORK MODELLING - 2006 GVWD RESERVOIR DEBT PAYMENT 2006 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION in-House Work Contract Work Payments Total PROJECT FOCUS Water distribution upgrading throughout Urban Area SUSTAINABILITY (LIFE CYCLE CONSIDERATION LTC AREA 46 CORE 90 COTTONWOOD 188 NORTH CENTRAL 685 LAITYVIEW 690 ALBION - AREA A 691 ALBION - AREA A 692 ALBION - AREA A 1328 DOWNTOWN CORE 1348 DOWNTOWN CORE 1387 WEST MAPLE RIDGE 1388 WEST MAPLE RIDGE 1397 MAPLE RIDGE (RURAL) 1409 COTTONWOOD 1491 MAPLE RIDGE (URBAN) 1496 MAPLE RIDGE (URBAN) 1566 CORE 1599 MAPLE RIDGE(RURAL) 3025 LAITYVIEW 3038 MAPLE RIDGE (URBAN) 3077 MAPLE RIDGE (URBAN) 7626 MAPLE RIDGE (URBAN) REVENUE SOURCE 991,752 Dev. Cost Charge 550.000 General Revenue S473.093 Water Utility Other S2,014,845 Total TYPE REPLACE-REHABILITATE REPLACE-REHABILITATE NEW INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACE-REHABILITATE REPLACE-REHABILITATE REPLACE-REHABILITATE REPLACE-REHABILITATE REPLACE-REHABILITATE REPLACE-REHABILITATE REPLACE-REHABILITATE REPLACE-REHABILITATE NEW INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACE-REHABILITATE NEW INFRASTRUCTURE NEW INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACE-REHABILITATE REPLACE-REHABILITATE REPLACE-REHABILITATE PAYMENT STUDY-ANALYSIS PAYMENT $616,553 $994,640 $403,652 S2,0 14.845 Water extension & storage in support development (Silver Valley) Waterworks Management Quantity Replacement Value Watermains 341 km @ SI75 S59,675,000 Pump Stations 10 @ S250.000 S2,500,000 Reservoirs 7 $4,000,000 Fire Hydrants 1610 @ $3000 S4,830,000 Valves 4756 $1,902,400 Water Connections 15806 @ SI 000 $15,806,000 S88,7I 3,400 Sustainability Provision $1,193,500 S50,000 $80,000 $96,600 $38,048 S316,I20 S 1,774,268 Page E2 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 LTC AREA TYPE 3 MAPLE RIDGE (RURAL) NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 27 CORE REPLACE-REHABILITATE 689 CORE REPLACE-REHABILITATE 1337 WEST MAJ'LE FUDGE REPLACE-REHABILITATE 1635 MAPLE RIDGE (URBAN) NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 2769 LAITYVIEW NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 3002 - SILVER VALLEY REPLACE-REHABILITATE 3013 WEST MAPLE RIDGE REPLACE-REHABILITATE 3039 SOUTHEAST CENTRAL NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 3078 MUNICIPAL HALL PAYMENT 3629 LAITYVIEW REPLACE-REHABILITATE 7627 MUNICIPAL HALL PAYMENT REVENUE SOURCE $941,999 Dev. Cost Charge S994,234 $675,754 General Revenue $473,093 Water Utility $941,999 Other $154,613 S2,090,846 Total $2,090,846 Water extension & storage in support development (Silver Valley) 2007 PROJECTS 263 ST (440 RESERVOIR - STAGE II) 119 AVE (227— 228) 222 ST(119—DTR) 203 ST (POWELL - 132) WATER CONNECTIONS / TIE-INS - 2007 DUNBAR ST (DTR - 122) 136 AVE (224— 350m E 224) 123 AVE (203-206) DCC PAYMENT TO JOINT SUPPLY SYSTEM, 2007 WATER NETWORK MODELLING - 2007 CLIFF AVE (CARSHILL ST - 222 ST) GVWD RESERVOIR DEBT PAYMENT 2007 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION In-House Work Contract Work Payments Total PROJECT FOCUS Water distribution system upgrading throughout Urban Area SUSTAINABILITY (LIFE CYCLE CONSIDERATION) Waterworks Management Quantity Replacement Value Sustainability Provision Watermains 341 km @ S175 $59,675,000 $1,193,500 Pump Stations 10 @5250,000 S2,500,000 $50,000 Reservoirs 7 S4,0001000 S80,000 Fire Hydrants 1610 @ S3000 S4.830,000 S96,600 Valves 4756 S 1,902.400 S38,048 Water Connections 15806 @ SI000 S15.806,000 5316.120 S88,713,400 S1,774.268 Page E3 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 2008 PROJECTS LTC AREA TYPE BROWN AVE (FRASER - 228) 88 CORE NEW INFRASTRUCTURE DCC PAYMENT TO JOINT SUPPLY SYSTEM 397 MUNICIPAL HALL PAYMENT 2008 203 ST (THORNE - LOUGHEED) 525 WEST MAPLE RIDGE REPLACE-REHABILITATE DEWDNEY TRUNK RD (232 —240) 1076 COTTONWOOD REPLACE-REHABILITATE 236 ST (FERN CRES - 132) 1596 SILVER VALLEY NEW INFRASTRUCTURE WATER CONNECTIONS/TIE-INS 2008 1784 MAPLE RIDGE (URBAN) NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 231 ST (117 AVE - 118 AVE) 2970 SOUTHEAST CENTRAL NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 123 AVE (206-208) 3023 WEST MAPLE RIDGE NEW INFRASTRUCTURE WATER NETWORK MODELLING 2008 3079 MUNICIPAL HALL STUDY-ANALYSIS COTTONWOOD DR (115-116) 7556 COTTONWOOD NEW INFRASTRUCTURE GVWD RESERVOIR DEBT PAYMENT 2008 7628 MUNICIPAL HALL PAYMENT ROTHSAY HEIGHTS RESERVOIR 7996 MAPLE RIDGE (RURAL) NEW IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DISTRIBUTION REVENUE SOURCE In-House Work $992,866 Dev. Cost Charge $606,6 10 Contract Work $329,003 General Revenue S38,202 Payments $473,093 Water Utility $992,866 Other $157,284 Total $1,794,962 Total $1,794,962 PROJECT FOCUS New infrastructure Water extension & storage in support development (Silver Valley) SUSTAINABJLITY (LIFE CYCLE CONSIDERATION Waterworks Management Quantity Replacement Value Sustainability Provision Watermains 341 km @ $175 S59,675,000 $1,193,500 Pump Stations 10 @ $250,000 52.500.000 $50,000 Reservoirs 7 S4,000.000 $80,000 Fire Hydrants 1610 @ S3000 $4,830,000 596,600 Valves 4756 S1,902.400 $38,048 Water Connections 15806 (i, Sl000 S!5.806.000 S316,120 S88,71 3,400 S 1,774,268 Page E4 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2006 APPENDIX F - MAPS Page Fl F 13 &YrPiU( I-a DEVONUT TU'f POO 40 R Maple Pd9e CL1ie a~e(oq es 2005 • ' 100 rTg/L • 080-099 rig/L 050-079 (9/1 020-049 r?'Q/ 0.10-019 rq/L • 000-009 mq,& 4! t'1 • F) - -- uQ F) PEI F) 0 CD C' '3 If 1, /1 / fIQ F) T1 C0RPOJATI0N OF THE N 11 0-6-m~ DJBTRJCI OF MAPLE RIDGE iAPLE RIDGE AVERAGE FREE CHLORINE 2006 FL(,C W *-CtOPi-2006 D1E. DEC 2006 A rio o —. -. — — ci0 '< rD 0 0 0 I i 444 I 25651. RESERVOIR - ---- --.- I I I 43 mcNull I \I I - vth 446 p 5, .101 ell 440 TEP SAMPLE LOCATIONS - J-I PS PUMP STATI0 _INDUSTPIAL A • L • S(PVOIR PEStP'OiP PPSDPV 7CtIF PIOIJNDAP'f UNiOPt flOUOP A PE-C1OPiti0N STAWN J - 6- 3-i aiia CORPORATION or THE DISTHJCT OF MAPLE RIDCE SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND MAPLE PIDGE ENWNEERING A DFIPARTMENI PRESSURE BOUNDARIES F ILt/t)W1 No 2006-PP(SSUR-!Dy omii DEC 2006 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 29, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: E02-036-011 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W 2007 TransLink MRN Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Agreement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: As part of TransLink, the District receives annual funds for operation, maintenance and rehabilitation (OMR) for the major road network (MRN) in Maple Ridge. TransLink has requested annual agreements since 2002 to formalize the practices between the two agencies. OMR funds are intended for normal operation and maintenance for pavement, shoulder, drainage, pedestrian facility, street lighting, traffic signal, street cleaning, snow, ice and vegetation control, and rehabilitation of the existing infrastructure. Execution of the 2007 OMR funding agreement, as done annually in the past, will permit the District to receive the funding for the year and to perform the work to provide safe and efficient mobility for road users of the major road network in Maple Ridge. The 2007 agreement is attached for Council's review and approval. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Mayor and Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and execute the agreement titled Major Road Network Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Agreement No. 2007-11 as attached to the staff report dated June 29, 2007. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The District of Maple Ridge has been a member of TransLink since 1998. As a member of TransLink, the District now receives over $673,000 annually for operation, maintenance and rehabilitation (OMR) for the major road network (MRN) in Maple Ridge (ref. list of MRN roads in Appendix A). The monies are provided to the District as quarterly payments. The District also receives funds for capital projects. However, this agreement pertains only to the operating and maintenance funds (each capital project requires the District to submit project certification prior to the District receiving funds). The 2007 OMR funding is $673,682.00 (up from $660,456.50 in 2006) and guidelines have been established on the eligible expenditures. 1104 The funding is based on the following principles: • Municipalities retain ownership of the roads and performing necessary operations, maintenance and rehabilitation • TransLink provides basic District of Maple Ridge funding Municipalities are free to choose how best to deliver operation, maintenance and rehabilitation services, whether through municipal crews or contractors. The attached agreement for 2007 (ref. Appendix B) formalizes the current practices between the District and TransLink. Intent of OMR Funds Under the established guidelines, should municipalities allow pavement quality to degrade below a pavement quality index (PQI) of 5.5, TransLink will reduce the OMR funding to that municipality until the pavement that is "below standard" is upgraded. Currently, all Maple Ridge MRN roads are above 5.5 (where 10 is the best and 1 is the poorest). The intent for the OMR funds include: normal operation and maintenance, including pavement maintenance, shoulder maintenance, drainage maintenance, pedestrian facility maintenance, street lighting maintenance, traffic signal maintenance, road markings and delineation, signage, lighting, signal operation, Street cleaning, snow and ice control, and vegetation control; rehabilitation of existing pavement; and rehabilitation of other existing infrastructure (e.g., curbs, shoulders, pedestrian facilities, drainage, street lighting and traffic signal systems, etc.). Operation and maintenance activities that are allowed include: • Pavement • Shoulders • Drainage • Pedestrian Facilities • Street Lighting • Traffic Signals • Signage • Road Markings and Delineation o Street Cleaning and Spill Response • Snow and Ice Control • Vegetation Control • Administration OMR funds are not intended to be used to construct new infrastructure, expand existing infrastructure (e.g., widen existing roads), purchase equipment required for OMR activities, or pay for work whatsoever on facilities that are not part of the MRN. As part of the agreement, municipalities are required to provide TransLink with annual OMR expenditure reports to be submitted by the end of March of the following year. The purpose of the annual agreement is to: show that OMR funds are, in fact, spent on the operation, maintenance and rehabilitation of the Major Road Network; confirm that sections of Major Road Network that are below standard are being rehabilitated; and C) identify trends and funding needs so that future adjustments can be made to categories and allocations, where appropriate. Municipalities are allowed to keep any unspent OMR funds in a reserve account designated for future use in operation, maintenance and rehabilitation of the MRN only. The opening and closing balance of the reserve are to be reported annually on the OMR expenditure reports. As well, TransLink conducts regular pavement condition surveys of the MRN (every three years, on average) to assess the pavement quality of the network. b) Strategic Alignment: Financial Management Council has directed that the municipality provide high quality municipal services to our citizens and customers in a cost effective and efficient manner and to identify methods to generate non- tax revenue. The use of TransLink funds leverages the general revenue contribution for road maintenance and is a method to ensure a high level of service for road users of the MRN. Smart Managed Growth The Corporate Strategic Plan directs that municipal and infrastructure be protected and managed through the preparation of appropriate plans to ensure maintenance of roads. The District entered into agreement with TransLink in 1998 as part of its plans to ensure adequate maintenance of the major roads in Maple Ridge. This annual agreement formalizes the current practices that the District uses to manage the maintenance of the MRN. Intergovernmental Relations/Partnerships: Council has directed that the District develop and maintain strong positive working relationships with TransLink and other governmental agencies. The annual agreement is consistent with Council's direction and reinforces the relationship with TransLink. Cftizen/Customer Implications: Maple Ridge residents and users of the Major Road Network expect that the investment in the network be maintained to provide safe, reliable and efficient transportation of goods and people using various transportation modes. Stable and adequate funding of maintenance and rehabilitation activities is required to meet customer expectations. The agreement provides for TransLink funding and support. Interdepartmental Implications: The Operations, Engineering and Finance departments collaborate in the administration of the TransLink agreement and the planning, operation, and maintenance of the major road network. Financial Implications: The 2007 District of Maple Ridge amount from TransLink for Maple Ridge MRN roads is $673,682.00. This is an increase from 2006 (which was $660,456). The $673,682.00 is comprised of the following: $12,735/lane km x 52.9 lane-km $673,682.00 Total $673,682.00 An example of the value of the annual contribution is the section of Lougheed Highway from 222 Street to the Haney Bypass. The rough value is approximately 11.3 lane km x $12,735 = $143,905 for 2007. The following table outlines TransLink funding allocations to Maple Ridge from 2000- 2007. In total, the District has received over $9 million since 1999. Table 1 - TransLink finding allocations to Maple Ridge: 2000- 2007 2000 2001 2002 2006 TransLink OMR $384470 $414,230 $511,800 $559,560 $631.200** $647,496 $660,456 $673,682 Funding to Maple_Ridge TransLink Block capital funding to Maple Ridge $314,000 $314,000 $471,000 $624,500* $623,000 $623,000 $620.500* $620.500* (this is what the District is eligible to receive) TOTAL $698,470 $728,230 $982,800 $1,184,060 $1,254,200 $1270496 $1,280,956 1 $1,294,182 * In 2003, the TransLink eligible block funding program was raised to $20M from $15M. The amounts adjust for annual MRN inventofy adjustments. In 2006, the funding eligibility reflected an adjustment in the total regional MRN inventory. ** In 2004, the funding level for the uploaded roads increased to $12,000 per lane km. For the 2005-2007 TransLink 3 year plan, an OMR price index will be used with a cap of +2% This is subject to review in future years. Policy Implications: The recommendation is in accordance with the approved Council budget and the Districts membership in TransLink. Alternatives: An alternative to not executing the agreement is to decline the funding of the MRN from TransLink. This however, will mean either a reduction in the maintenance work for roads or alternatively, funding replacement and will require a budget amendment. CONCLUSION: The District now receives approximately $673,000 annually for operation, maintenance and rehabilitation (OMR) for the major road network (MRN) in Maple Ridge and an annual agreement formalizes the current practices between the District and TransLink. Execution of the 2007 OMR funding agreement is required. Prepared by: Anqcew Wood, PhD., PEng. Financial irevor Thompson, CGA Municipal Engineer Concurrence: Manager, Financial Planning Approvedy: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. / GenQl M bl Concurrence: J.L. (i/ru) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AW/mi J and Development Services ri'i Major Road Network Maple Ridge ROAD SEGMENT FROM TO BORDER COMMENTS 132nd Ave 232nd St Fern Cres 232nd St Dewdney Trunk Rd 132nd Ave 240 St River Rd Lougheed Hwy Dewdney Trunk Rd Lougheed Hwy 232nd St Fern Cres 132nd Ave Golden Ears Park Gate Lougheed Hwy Haney By-Pass (222nd St) Haney By-Pass (232nd St) River Rd Albion Ferry (McMillart Is) Terminal 240 St APPENDIX B MRN Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Agreement No. 2007-11 MAJOR ROAD NETWORK OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM AGREEMENT Agreement No. 200 7-11 THIS AGREEMENT made the ________day of 1 20. BETWEEN: Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority, having an office at 1600 - 4720 Kingsway, Burnaby, BC, V5H 4N2 ("TransLink") OF THE FIRST PART AND: District of Maple Ridge, having an office at 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 (the "Municipality") OF THE SECOND PART The parties hereby agree as follows: 1.0 Defmitions .1 In this Agreement, the following terms will have the following meanings: "MRN" will mean those segments of the Major Road Network falling within the jurisdiction of the Municipality; "OMR Guidelines" will mean the Major Road Network Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Description and Guidelines issued by TransLink, as amended from time to time; "Eligible Costs" will mean costs properly and reasonably incurred and paid by the Municipality solely and specifically in relation to the operation, maintenance and rehabilitation of the MRN, as described in the OMR Guidelines; "OMR Program" will mean the 2007 Operation. Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program, as described in the OMR Guidelines; Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 1 of 7 MRN Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Agreement No. 2007-11 "Work" will mean all goods to be provided and services to be performed by the Municipality in relation to the operation, maintenance and rehabilitation of the MRN, as described in the OMR Guidelines, whether such Work is undertaken by municipal crews or by contractors engaged by the Municipality. 2.0 OMR Program 2.1 The Municipality will operate, maintain and rehabilitate the Major Road Network in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in this Agreement. 2.2 The Municipality will undertake and complete the Work: 2.2.1 in accordance with the OMR Guidelines; 2.2.2 in a professional, competent, timely and diligent manner, and in accordance with acceptable industry standards; and 2.2.3 in compliance with all applicable laws, statutes, regulations, by-laws, and directions of all governmental and statutory authorities. 2.4 2.3 The Municipality confirms that: 2.3.1 TransLink will not be responsible in any way for: 2.3.1.1 any deficiency or defect in the Work or completion of the Work; or 2.3.1.2 any costs of undertaking the Work in excess of the allocation set out in s. 3. 2.3.2 TransLink will have the right to advertise or promote its participation in the OMR Program. TransLink's participation in the OMR Program may be advertised or promoted in any media format including, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing: signs located on one or more MRN roads; print, radio and television advertisements; and, electronic advertising on the world wide web. The Municipality retains the right to approve of the location of signs on the MRN and the content of advertisements or promotions, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. 3.0 2007 Allocation 3.1 Under this Agreement. TransLink will pay the Municipality a total of $673.682.00 for Eligible Costs in connection with the OMR Program incurred between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007, inclusive of all applicable taxes, or funds reserved for use in a future year's OMR Program. 3.2 Payments will be quarterly, in arrears, via Electronic Fund Transfers. Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 2 of 7 MRN Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Agreement No. 2007-11 3.3 As of April 13, 2007, our records show that the following "below standard" uploaded roads have not been rehabilitated. None - Not Applicable Therefore, the 2007 allocation described in s.3.1 is net of a deduction of $0.00 . 3.4 If the road(s) listed in s. 3.3 are rehabilitated by the Municipality, as required by Section 2.3 of the OMR Guidelines, and TransLink is notified of the completion of such rehabilitation work by November 30, 2007, then the deduction referred to in s. 3.3 for the rehabilitated road(s) will be released with the final quarterly payment for 2007. 3.5 For clarification, the parties confirm that the payment specified in s.3.1 applies only to the 2007 OMR Program. Funding levels in future years may be more or less than the 2007 amount; any future funding provided by TransLink will be covered by separate agreements. 4.0 Records and Audit 4.1 The Municipality will maintain accurate and complete records in relation to the OMR Program, including, without limitation, supporting documentation of all expenditures related to Eligible Costs, from the beginning of the 2007 OMR Program until two years after its completion (i.e., from January 1, 2007 until December 31, 2009). 4.2 The Municipality will provide TransLink with an expenditure report for the 2007 Work, as described in the OMR Guidelines, by March 31, 2008. The information in the report will be certified in writing as correct by the Municipality's Chief Financial Officer and City Engineer (or equivalents). 4.3 TransLink will have the right to enter upon the Municipality's premises for the purpose of auditing OMR Program expenditures at any time during normal business hours. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, TransLink will have the right to inspect and copy any records relating to OMR Program expenditures, including any supporting documentation. 4.4 All Eligible Costs included in the 2007 expenditure report must be substantiated by supporting documentation. Any undocumented costs may be considered ineligible under the OMR Program. 5.0 Indemnity and Release 5.1 The Municipality will indemnify and save harmless TransLink, its subsidiaries, and their directors, officers, employees and agents, (collectively the "Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all losses, claims, complaints (including, without limitation, complaints pursuant to human rights legislation), damages, actions, causes of action, Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 3 of 7 MRN Operation. Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Agreement No. 290 7-11 fines, penalties, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, actual legal fees and disbursements) the Indemnified Parties may sustain, incur, suffer or be put to any time, either before or after the expiration or termination of this Agreement, arising out of, or in connection with the operation, maintenance or rehabilitation of the MRN. including, without limitation: 5.1.1 any breach of this Agreement or anything done or omitted to be done, whether negligently or otherwise, by the Municipality or any councillor, officer, employee, agent, contractor or subcontractor of the Municipality pursuant to this Agreement; 5.1.2 the operation, maintenance or rehabilitation of the MRN, whether negligent or otherwise; 5.1.3 any contravention or alleged contravention of applicable laws, statutes, regulations, by-laws, or directions of governmental or statutory authorities issued under lawful authority, including, without limitation, those related to the environment, environmental protection and contaminated sites; or 5.1.4 any review, inspection, audit, approval, acceptance or payment by TransLink in relation to the operation, maintenance or rehabilitation of the MRN; whether or not such losses, claims, complaints, damages, actions, causes of action, fines, penalties, costs or expenses relate to the acts or omissions, whether negligent or otherwise, of the Indemnified Parties. 5.2 In addition to the forgoing, and notwithstanding any other term or provision herein contained, the Municipality, for and on behalf of itself, its councillors, officers, employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors, hereby unconditionally, absolutely and irrevocably releases and forever discharges the Indemnified Parties from any and all losses, liabilities or damages, at law or in equity and whether direct, indirect or consequential, which relate to, arise out of, or are in any way connected with the operation, maintenance or rehabilitation of the MRN, whether caused by, or arising through the negligence of, the Indemnified Parties. 6.0 Default 6.1 Provision of funds by TransLink to the Municipality under the OMR Program is contingent upon the Municipality maintaining the functionality of the Major Road Network and undertaking the Work in accordance with the OMR Guidelines. If the municipality fails to do so, TransLink may withhold all or part of the funding provided under the OMR Program. 6.2 Withholding of funds by TransLink does not release the Municipality from its responsibility to operate, maintain and rehabilitate the MRN. Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 4 of 7 MRN Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Agreement No. 2007-11 7.0 Dispute Resolution 7.1 Any dispute or controversy occurring between the parties hereto relating to the interpretation or implementation of any of the provisions of this Agreement will be resolved by arbitration, conducted by one arbitrator. The parties will agree on the arbitrator or, failing agreement, the arbitrator will be appointed in accordance with the rules of the British Columbia International Commercial Arbitration Centre. Any arbitration will be held in the City of Vancouver and conducted pursuant to the rules of procedure of the British Columbia International Commercial Arbitration Centre and the British Columbia Commercial Arbitration Act. 8.0 General 8.1 This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of British Columbia and the laws of Canada. The parties consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of British Columbia. 8.2 If any terms, covenant, or condition contained in this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance will to any extent be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement or the application of that term, covenant, or condition to persons or circumstances, other than those concerning which it is held invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby and each term, covenant, and condition of this Agreement will be separately valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 83 Time will be of the essence under this Agreement. 8.4 The provisions contained in this Agreement and in the OMR Guidelines constitute the entire agreement between the parties and supersede all previous communications, representations, expectations, understandings and agreements, whether written or unwritten, between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. 8.5 All notices, demands, payments or other communications required or permitted hereunder will be in writing and may be delivered prepaid, sent by facsimile or sent by prepaid first class mail. Any notice delivered will be deemed to have been given or received at the time of delivery to the address of the recipient as set out below. Any notice delivered by facsimile will be deemed to be delivered on the next day following the date of transmission thereof. Any notice mailed as aforesaid will be deemed to have been given and received on the fourth day following the date of its mailing. Any notice will be addressed as follows: Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 5 of 7 MRN Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Agreement No. 2007-11 To: TransL ink 1600 - 4720 Kingsway Burnaby, BC, V5H 4N2 Attention: S.W. Hollingshead, PEng, MBA Manager, Roads and Bridges Facsimile No.: (604) 453-4629 To: District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Attention: Mr. Andrew Wood, PEng Municipal Engineer Facsimile No.: (604) 467-7425 8.6 In the event there is a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the OMR Guidelines, the terms of this Agreement will prevail. Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 6 of 7 MRN Operation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Agreement No. 2007-11 8.7 The Municipality may not assign this Agreement without the prior written, consent of TransLink. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. GREATER VANCOUVER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (Authorized Signatory) Name, Title (Please print) DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE (Authorized Signatory) Name, Title (Please print) (Authorized Signatory) Name, Title (Please print) Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority Page 7 of 7 4 IMJIS;iI.ieI Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 29, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: E08-015-1025 Chief Administrative Officer E01-052-001 ATrN: CofW Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 120/07 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A developer has subdivided land at 245 Street and McClure Drive. Part of the subdivision servicing is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local Government Act. The extended servicing benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC 120/07 provides the municipality's assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or extended servicing to the benefiting lands. RECOMMENDATION: That with respect to the subdivision of lands involved in subdivision SD 28/05 located at 245 Street and McClure Drive, be it resolved: That the cost to provide the excess or extended services are, in whole or in part, excessive to the municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall be paid by the owners of the land being subdivided, and That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or extended services on the parcels and in the amounts as set out in the staff report dated June 29, 2007; and further That the Mayor and Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 120/07 with the subdivider of the said lands. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The attached map identifies the lands which are involved in the subdivision and those which will benefit from the excess or extended services. The cost breakdown for each excess or extended service is shown on attached Schedule A. In addition, a copy of Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 120/07 is also attached for information purposes. 1105 b) Strategic Alignment: Administration of excess or extended services legislation complies with the Smart Managed Growth element of the Corporate Strategic Plan. The administration procedure supports the requirement for a developer to construct municipal infrastructure in support of land development and recognizes that the infrastructure may provide benefit to other land. C) Policy Implications: Part 26, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all or part of the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality shall determine the proportion of the cost of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and determine the proportion of the cost of the service to be attributed to parcels of land which the municipality considers will benefit from the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 120/07 will provide such determination for Subdivision SD 28/05. CONCLUSION: A developer has provided certain services in support of Subdivision SD 28/05. Some of the services benefit adjacent lands therefore, it is appropriate to impose Latecomer Charges on the benefitting lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 120/07 summarizes the municipality's determination of benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the term over which such Latecomer Charges will be applied. Prepary'J b/ Terryr,er, PEng. .." Mafagr of Corporate & Development Engineering Reviewed byew Wood, PhD., PEng. Mujiicipal Engineei- / Approved/by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. M: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: I.L. (Jim) Rule thief Administrative Officer il/bc Schedule A TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE 1. EXTENDED NOMINAL SERVICE SERVICE #BENEFITTING COSTOF LOTS BENEFIT COST PER BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING SUBDIVISION Storm Sewer 12 $10,404.00 $867.00 Lot 4, Plan 75957 245B Street 3 x $867.00 Lot 5, Plan 75957 8 x $867.00 Sanitary Sewer 14 $14,378.00 $1,027.00 Lot 3, Plan 75957 245B Street 2 x $1,027.00 Lot 4, Plan 75957 3 x $1,027.00 Lot 5, Plan 75957 8 x $1,027.00 2. EXTENDED OVERSIZE SERVICE SERVICE #BENEFITTING COSTOF BENEFIT LOTS BENEFIT ATTRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING SUBDIVISION Storm Sewer 3 $1,056.00 Lot 4, Plan 75957 245B Street 1 x $267.00 Lot 5, Plan 75957 1 x $535.00 Lot 7, Plan 75957 1 x $254.00 Sanitary Sewer 5 $1,312.00 Lot 3, Plan 75957 245B Street 1 x $218.00 Lot 4, Plan 75957 lx $262.00 Lot 5, Plan 75957 1 x $526.00 Lot 6, Plan 72100 lx $55.00 Lot 7, Plan 72100 Page 1 SERVICE # BEN EFI1TING COST OF BENEFIT LOTS BENEFIT A1TRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING SUBDIVISION 1 x $251.00 A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows: Lot 3, Sec 10, Tp 12, Plan 75957, NWD $ 2,272.00 Lot 4, Sec 10, Tp 12, Plan 75957, NWD $ 6,211.00 Lot 5, Sec 10, Tp 12, Plan 75957, NWD $ 16,213.00 Lot 6, Sec 10 & 11, Tp 12, Plan 72100, NWD $ 55.00 Lot 7, Sec 10 & 11, Tp 12, Plan 72100 NWD $ 505.00 Page 2 BENEFITTING PROPERTIES A SCALE: N.T.S. em.83 84 (77 PARK 15 . . .. 2 ......... SUBDIViSION ' iO PROP RilES 10583 70578 10570 ......... 10579 5 8 ul cv 10529 10530 4 105011 1 10500 10445 3 II 9 E1 10470 2 10 /T~ /10412 12 / ii 104 AVE. 28 II 48 I I SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY EXCESS CAPACITY/EXTENDED SERVICES AGREEMENT LC 120/07 SD 28/05 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE ENGINEERING Incorporated 12 September, 1874 DEPARTMENT FILE/DWG No JUNE 2007 DATE: JUNE 2007 EXCESS CAPACITY LATECOMER AGREEMENT LC 120/07 - SD 28/05 THIS AGREEMENT made the day of , 2007: B ETWEEN: Glenn and Karen Rogers 10587 245B Street Maple Ridge BC V2W 1G5 Edward and Carol Meldrum 10583 245B Street Maple Ridge BC V2W 1G5 (Hereinafter called the "Subdivider") OF THE FIRST PART AND: CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under the "Local Government Act", having its offices at 11995 Haney Place, in the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia (Hereinafter called the "Municipality") OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS: The Subdivider has subdivided certain lands and premises located within the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more particularly known and described as: Lots 1 and 2, Sec 10, Tp 12, Plan 75957. NWD (Hereinafter called the "said lands") In order to facilitate the approval of the subdivision of the said lands, the Subdivider has constructed and installed the storm sewer and sanitary sewer services shown on the design prepared by ABM Engineering Services Ltd., Job No. C-804-09, (Sheets 1 to 17) dated November 6, 2006, reviewed January 31, 2007. Project No. E08-015- 1025. (Hereinafter called the "Extended Services"); Page 1 The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands and other than the said lands; The Municipality considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive; The Subdivider has provided the Extended Services in the Amount of $27,150.00. The Municipality has determined that the following properties: Lot 3, Sec 10, Tp 12, Plan 75957, NWD Lot 4, Sec 10, Tp 12, Plan 75957, NWD Lot 5, Sec 10, Tp 12, Plan 75957, NWD Lot 6, Sec 10 & 11, Tp 12, Plan 72100, NWD Lot 7, Sec 10 & 11, Tp 12, Plan 72100, NWD (the "Benefitting Lands") will benefit from the Extended Services; The Municipality has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands connecting to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the "Latecomer Charge") on the Benefitting Lands in the following amounts: Lot 3, Sec 10, Tp 12, Plan 75957, NWD • $1,027.00 per lot, to a maximum of $2,054.00, for connection to or use of the sanitary sewer on 245B Street. • $218.00 for any use of the sanitary sewer on 245B Street Lot 4, Sec 10, Tp 12, Plan 75957, NWD. o $867.00 per lot, to a maximum of $2,601.00,for connection to or use of the storm sewer on 245B Street from the south side of the existing manhole which is ten metres south of the southeast corner of Lot 4, Plan 75957. • $267.00 for any use of the storm sewer on 2456 Street from the south side of the existing manhole which is ten metres south of the southeast corner of Lot 4, Plan 75957. • $1,027.00 per lot, to a maximum of $3,081.00, for connection to or use of the sanitary sewer on 2456 Street. • $262.00 for any use of the sanitary sewer on 2456 Street. Lot 5, Sec 10, Tp 12, Plan 75957, NWD. • $867.00 per lot, to a maximum of $6,936.00, for connection to or use of the storm sewer on 2456 Street from the south side of the existing manhole which is ten metres south of the southeast corner of Lot 4, Plan 75957. o $535.00 for any use of the storm sewer on 245B Street from the south side of the existing manhole which is ten metres south of the southeast corner of Lot 4, Plan 75957. • $1,027.00 per lot, to a maximum of $8,216.00, for connection to or use of the sanitary sewer on 245B Street. • $526.00 for any use of the sanitary sewer on 245B Street. Lot 6, Sec 10 & 11, Tp 12, Plan 72100, NWD Page 2 • $55.00 for any use of the sanitary sewer on 245B Street that starts at the cul-de-sac and ends opposite the north property line of Lot 6, Plan 72100. Lot 7, Sec 10 & 11, Tp 12, Plan 72100, NWD • $254.00 for any use of the storm sewer on 245B Street that starts at the cut- de-sac and ends opposite the north property line of Lot 6, Plan 72100. • $251.00 for any use of the sanitary sewer on 245B Street that starts at the cul-de-sac and ends opposite the north property line of Lot 6, Plan 72100. plus interest calculated annually from the date of completion of the Extended Services as certified by the General Manager - Public Works and Development Services of the Municipality (the "Completion Date") to the date of connection by the Benefitting Lands to the Extended Services; H. The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality shall pursuant to Section 939 (7) of the Municipal Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 be paid to the Subdivider as provided for in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 939 (9) of the Local Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 323, The parties hereto agree as follows: The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality within ten (10) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to the Subdivider and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of June 30th and December 31st of the year in which the Latecomer Charge is collected by the Municipality. This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer Charge by the Municipality to the Subdivider, or ten (10) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the Municipality shall be forever fully released and wholly discharged from any and all liability and obligations herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer Charge, and whether arising before or after the expiry of this Agreement. The Subdivider represents and warrants to the Municipality that the Subdivider has not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from the owner of the Benefitting Lands for the provision, or expectation of the provision of the Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein; and further represents and warrants that he has not entered into any agreement with the owner of the Benefitting Lands for consideration in any way related to or connected directly or indirectly with the provision of the Extended Services. The representations and warranties of the Subdivider herein shall, notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Agreement, survive the expiry of this Agreement. The Subdivider (if more than one corporate body or person) hereby agrees that the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in equal shares. Page 3 If the Subdivider is a sole corporate body or person, the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the following (name and address of director of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.): In the event that the Subdivider is not the owner of the said lands, the owner shall hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto the Subdivider, his heirs and assigns, all rights, title and interest under this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective Corporate Seals, attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf, the day, and year first above written. Glenn Rogers - Subdivider Edward Meldrum - Subdivider Karen Rogers - Subdivider Carol Metdrum - Subdivider The Corporate Seal of the CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE was hereunto affixed in the presence of: Mayor - Authorized Signatory Corporate Officer - Authorized Signatory Page 4 .4 I * District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 29, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: E08-016-671 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer E01-052-001 AUN: CofW SUBJECT: Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 121/07 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A developer has subdivided land at 124 Avenue and Cherry Place. Part of the subdivision servicing is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local Government Act. The extended servicing benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC 121/07 provides the municipality's assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or extended servicing to the benefiting lands. RECOMMENDATION: That with respect to the subdivision of lands involved in subdivision SD 25/05 located at 124 Avenue and Cherry Place, be it resolved: That the cost to provide the excess or extended services are, in whole or in part, excessive to the municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall be paid by the owners of the land being subdivided, and That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or extended services on the parcels and in the amounts as set out in the staff report dated June 29, 2007; and further That the Mayor and Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 121/07 with the subdivider of the said lands. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The attached map identifies the lands which are involved in the subdivision and those which will benefit from the excess or extended services. The cost breakdown for each excess or extended service is shown on attached Schedule A. In addition, a copy of Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 121/07 is also attached for information purposes. b) Strategic Alignment: Administration of excess or extended services legislation complies with the Smart Managed Growth element of the Corporate Strategic Plan. The administration procedure supports the requirement for a developer to construct municipal infrastructure in support of land development and recognizes that the infrastructure may provide benefit to other land. C) Policy Implications: Part 26, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all or part of the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality shall determine the proportion of the cost of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and determine the proportion of the cost of the service to be attributed to parcels of land which the municipality considers will benefit from the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 121/07 will provide such determination for Subdivision SD 2 5/05. CONCLUSION: A developer has provided certain services in support of Subdivision SD 25/05. Some of the services benefit adjacent lands therefore, it is appropriate to impose Latecomer Charges on the benefitting lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 121/07 summarizes the municipality's determination of benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the term over which such Latecomer Charges will be applied. PrepareIb, Terry ryer, PEng. Manager of Corporate & Development Engineering Reviewed b/Andrew Wood, PhD., PEng. Mu2icipal Engineer , (L Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. / GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: IJ.L. (Jim) Rule /chief Administrative Officer ljl/bc Schedule A TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE 1. EXTENDED NOMINAL SERVICE SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF COST PER BENEFIT LOTS BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLU DING SUBDIVISION Storm Sewer 3 $7,500.00 $2,500.00 Lot 96, Plan 26156 124 Avenue I x $2,500.00 Lot 97, Plan 26156 I x $2,500.00 Storm Sewer 3 $6,699.00 $2,233.00 Lot 2, Plan 59697 Walkway 1 x $2,333.00 Lot 160, Plan 33135 1 x $2,233.00 A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows: Lot 96, DL 245, Plan 26156, NWD Lot 97, DL 245, Plan 26156, NWD Lot 3, DL 24, Plan 59697, NWD Lot 160, DL 244, 33135, NWD $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,233.00 $ 2,233.00 Page 1 EXETER AVE. '--'11b __--- CL * ii I 230 241N ri N 12508-C P 24238 \4 1 2 233 232 231 IL 148 149 150 30 1 2 1 2 229 242 12502 5E858 _____________ :-..-.-:.•:-:.:•: 26 227 228 243 151 12484 - - 3 12503 12489 25 P 36952 225 _2 SPRING A 12474 IC) D .ENEF1TflNG. 21497 5pgI4G . 152 Ln 199 3 PROPERT 215 - 12481 24 a- 224 21491 223 153 ____ _____ J 216 - a- 12475 CHERRY PLACE ' ) 222 12470 °- — . 12471 154 8 221 :s1 155 23 22 21 20 19 160 N P 21526 to 219 8 - 1246 0 1 124J9 P 13481 P0 0 4 6 a- IM 157 P6796 12427 - 6 5 4 3 2 159 1 7851 B BCP 6488 42 43 44 45 H 98 7 u 12409 ___ CN WE. 124 AVE. NN 12380 2 -. 214 215 216 N E 2 1 92 93 94 95 •.•6.-.• •.•.97•.• 121 Rem 2 P6540 a- Sk \1236 1 4 a- 1650 A P 8120 P 26156 . . .• -E.2156--. .. - P 13 700 173 213 _____ BENE tTTtN. a- P 62639 .P•ROP RIlES- ____ P 18981 P 18981 P 17643 P 1E125 P 24856 32 31 30 29 I 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 14 13 12 11 21 20 A 2 123 AVE. I I SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY BENEFITTINC PROPERTIES EXCESS CAPACITY/EXTENDED N SERVICES AGREEMENT LC 121/07 SD 25/05 aal~~~ ! DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE I MAPLE RIDGE ENGINEERING tncorported 12 September, 1874 DEPARTMENT SCALE: rILE/DWG No LO 121-2007 DATE: JUNE 2007 _____ N.T.S. EXCESS CAPACITY LATECOMER AGREEMENT LC 12 1/07 - SD 25/05 THIS AGREEMENT made the day of , 2007: BETWEEN: Genevie Olson 21497 124 Avenue Maple Ridge BC V2X 41-14 (Hereinafter called the "Subdivider") OF THE FIRST PART AND: CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under the "Local Government Act", having its offices at 11995 Haney Place, in the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia (Hereinafter called the "Municipality") OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS: The Subdivider has subdivided certain lands and premises located within the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more particularly known and described as: Lots 1, DL 244, Plan 10088, NWD (Hereinafter called the "said lands") In order to facilitate the approval of the subdivision of the said lands, the Subdivider has constructed and installed the storm sewer services shown on the design prepared by S.B. Neuman, PEng.., Sheets 1 to 3, dated January, 2006, reviewed as noted May 16, 2006. Project No. E08-016-671. (Hereinafter called the "Extended Services"); The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands and other than the said lands; The Municipality considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive; Page 1 The Subdivider has provided the Extended Services in the Amount of $14,199.00. The Municipality has determined that the following properties: Lot 96, DL 245, Plan 26156, NWD Lot 97, DL 245, Plan 26156, NWD Lot 3, DL 244, Plan 59697, NWD Lot 160, DL 244, Plan 33135, NWD (the "Benefitting Lands") will benefit from the Extended Services; The Municipality has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands connecting to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the "Latecomer Charge") on the Benefitting Lands in the following amounts: Lot 96, DL 245, Plan 26156, NWD o $2,500.00 for connection to the storm sewer on 124 Avenue, from 8 metres east of the west property line of Lot 97, Plan 26156 to 23 metres west of the west property line of Lot 97, Plan 26156. Lot 97, DL 245, Plan 26156, NWD • $2,500.00 for connection to the storm sewer on 124 Avenue, from 8 metres east of the west property line of Lot 97, Plan 26156 to 23 metres west of the west property line of Lot 97, Plan 26156. Lot 3, DL 244, Plan 59697, NWD • $2,233.00 for direct connection to the storm sewer at the walkway along the north boundary of Lot A, Plan BCP 25117. Lot 160, DL 244, Plan 33135, NWD • $2,233.00 for direct connection to the storm sewer at the walkway along the north boundary of Lt A, Plan BCP 25117, without extension of the storm sewer. plus interest calculated annually from the date of completion of the Extended Services as certified by the General Manager - Public Works and Development Services of the Municipality (the "Completion Date") to the date of connection by the Benefitting Lands to the Extended Services: The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality shall pursuant to Section 939 (7) of the Municipal Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 be paid to the Subdivider as provided for in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 939 (9) of the Local Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 323, The parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality within ten (10) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to the Subdivider Page 2 and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of June 30th and December 31st of the year in which the Latecomer Charge is collected by the Municipality. This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer Charge by the Municipality to the Subdivider, or ten (10) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the Municipality shall be forever fully released and wholly discharged from any and all liability and obligations herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer Charge, and whether arising before or after the expiry of this Agreement. The Subdivider represents and warrants to the Municipality that the Subdivider has not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from the owner of the Benefiting Lands for the provision, or expectation of the provision of the Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein; and further represents and warrants that he has not entered into any agreement with the owner of the Benefiting Lands for consideration in any way related to or connected directly or indirectly with the provision of the Extended Services. The representations and warranties of the Subdivider herein shall, notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Agreement, survive the expiry of this Agreement. The Subdivider (if more than one corporate body or person) hereby agrees that the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in equal shares. If the Subdivider is a sole corporate body or person, the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the following (name and address of director of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.): 6. In the event that the Subdivider is not the owner of the said lands, the owner shall hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto the Subdivider, his heirs and assigns, all rights, title and interest under this Agreement. Page 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective Corporate Seals, attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf, the day, and year first above written. Genevie Olson - Subdivider The Corporate Seal of the CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE was hereunto affixed in the presence of: Mayor - Authorized Signatory Corporate Officer - Authorized Signatory Page 4 District of Maple Ridge :l1IfltTT Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 29, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: E08-016-658 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer EO1-052-001 AUN: CofW SUBJECT: Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 122/07 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A developer has subdivided land at 228 Street and 122 Avenue. Part of the subdivision servicing is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local Government Act. The extended servicing benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC 122/07 provides the municipality's assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or extended servicing to the benefiting lands. RECOMMENDATION: That with respect to the subdivision of lands involved in subdivision SD 104/03 located at 228 Street and 122 Avenue, be it resolved: That the cost to provide the excess or extended services are, in whole or in part, excessive to the municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall be paid by the owners of the land being subdivided, and That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or extended services on the parcels and in the amounts as set out in the staff report dated June 29, 2007; and further That the Mayor and Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 122/07 with the subdivider of the said lands. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The attached map identifies the lands which are involved in the subdivision and those which will benefit from the excess or extended services. The cost breakdown for each excess or extended service is shown on attached Schedule A. 1107 In addition, a copy of Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 122/07 is also attached for information purposes. Strategic Alignment: Administration of excess or extended services legislation complies with the Smart Managed Growth element of the Corporate Strategic Plan. The administration procedure supports the requirement for a developer to construct municipal infrastructure in support of land development and recognizes that the infrastructure may provide benefit to other land. Policy Implications: Part 26, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all or part of the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality shall determine the proportion of the cost of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and determine the proportion of the cost of the service to be attributed to parcels of land which the municipality considers will benefit from the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 122/07 will provide such determination for Subdivision SD 104/03. CONCLUSION: A developer has provided certain services in support of Subdivision SD 104/03. Some of the services benefit adjacent lands therefore, it is appropriate to impose Latecomer Charges on the benefitting lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 122/07 summarizes the municipality's determination of benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the term over which such Latecomer Charges will be applied. Prepar/d b/Terry Fry,r, PEng. of Corporate & Development Engineering Reviewe ew Wood, PhD., PEng. Mu7cipajEngine Approved b: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. GM: Public Works & evel pment Services 9,--c Concurrene: J.L. (Jim) Rule / Chief Administrative Officer lit/bc Schedule A Sanitary Sewer 10 $12,150.00 $1,215.00 Storm Sewer 10 $12,700.00 $1,270.00 BENEFIT ATrRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING SUBDIVISION Lot 3, Plan 13667 4x$1,215.00 Lot 353, Plan 57241 1 x $1,215.00 Lot 6, Plan 13667 1 x $1,215.00 Lot 3, Plan 13667 4 x $1,270.00 Lot 353 Plan 57241 1 x $1,270.00 Lot 6, Plan 13667 1 x $1,270.00 TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE 1. EXTENDED NOMINAL SERVICE SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF COST PER LOTS BENEFIT LOT A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows: Lot 3, SE ¼, Sec 20, Tp 12, Plan 13667, NWD $ 9,940.00 Lot 353, SE ¼, Sec 20, Tp 12, Plan 57241, NWD $ 2,485.00 Lot 6, SE ¼, Sec 20, Tp 12, Plan 13667, NWD $ 2,485.00 Page 1 PI41773 L P I1 56 575859 60 61 r\P 41773lJ 122981 I I ROGERS AVE. QD 12278 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 P 41773 P 41774 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 ' P 12258 E ENEFITTING - PROPR11122 AVE. S V /12238 1021103110411051106107110 P 41774 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 12224 (\ STOREY AVE. 12192 126 127 128 129 130 131 P 428712 P 441292 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 12180 ,- .-. - .- .- EAGLE AVE. l 72166 225 226 227 228 229 230 1231 P 4429 1,.*.,.*.,.7 1 BENEFITTING PROPERTIES 0 SCALE: N. T.S. 331 2 P 56967 82 12373 i H 114 N 12314 N10 NO 12313 81 1w 78LC) a1 12301 I II- 12304 12303 US') 80 79 12 12287 12288 12293 Rem. 64 P 11200 12305 P 51413 12301 332 333 12296 P 45)78 12282 307 308 12254178 12275 291 222 12273 ! 873 12255 292 P 40082 A 12261 12258 12255 RP 16335 12253 rfl-. 352 309 (N .2 - •:• .•.• •'--•.• .tP......... 10 3 O- - (0 12243 O) r) 122 AVE. ...'... - 12229 L 8 1 I2 34 12211 1 RQP/l- LQZ 2 1 12203 / 1 P 1 1 •.'.••I'.I•.•••.I'. P 82923 / - 72207 1 12208 BCP 'QA Rem. N 75' of 1 288 A / ') 12794 SUBDIVISION 12195 P 58171 12183 Rem. 1 289 12791 0- P 4836 - 336 12169 12182 12185 0 P 414396 - UCS 569 303 304 Rem 2 72167 12165 72167 335 S. 52.5' 2 12757 341 12161 - LMP IV'A11 308 P r7607 33 334 340 P 62578 12 P 71970 6 P 14396 80 c rI (N 79 .j- 0 N 1/2 10 3 1/2 10 Wei Ni/29 S/29 °- - I I SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY EXCESS CAPACITY/EXTENDED SERVICES AGREEMENT LC 122/07 SD 104/03 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE ENGINEERING Incorporeted 12 September, 1874 DEPARTMENT FILE/DWC No LC 122-2007 I DATE: JUNE 2007 EXCESS CAPACITY LATECOMER AGREEMENT LC 122/07 - SD 104/03 THIS AGREEMENT made the day of , 2007: BETWEEN: Kenneth and Jo-Ann Knuttila 22824 122 Avenue Maple Ridge BC V2X 6M3 (Hereinafter called the "Subdivider") OF THE FIRST PART AND: CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under the "Local Government Act", having its offices at 11995 Haney Place, in the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia (Hereinafter called the "Municipality") OF THE SECOND PART WH EREAS: The Subdivider has subdivided certain lands and premises located within the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more particularly known and described as: Lot 2, Sec 20, Tp 12, Plan 13667, NWD (Hereinafter called the "said lands") In order to facilitate the approval of the subdivision of the said lands, the Subdivider has constructed and installed the sanitary sewer and storm sewer services shown on the design prepared by Beesley Engineering Ltd., Job No. 05-16 (Sheets 1 to 4), dated March 2005, reviewed January 2, 2006. Project No. E08-016-658. (Hereinafter called the "Extended Services"); The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands and other than the said lands; The Municipality considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive; The Subdivider has provided the Extended Services in the Amount of $24,850.00. Page 1 The Municipality has determined that the following properties: Lot 3, SE ¼, Sec 20, Tp 12, Plan 13667, NWD Lot 353, SE ¼, Sec 20, Tp 12, Plan 57241, NWD Lot 6, SE ¼, Sec 20, Tp 12, Plan 13667, NWD (the "Benefitting Lands") will benefit from the Extended Services; The Municipality has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands connecting to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the "Latecomer Charge") on the Benefitting Lands in the following amounts: Lot 3, SE 1/4, Sec 20, Tp 12, Plan 13667, NWD • $1,215.00 per lot, to a maximum of $4,860.00, for connection to the sanitary sewer on 122 Avenue. • $1,270.00 per lot, to a maximum of $5,080.00, for connection to the storm sewer on 122 Avenue. Lot 353, SE ¼, Sec 20, Tp 12, Plan 57241, NWD • $1,215.00 for use of the sanitary sewer on 122 Avenue. • $1,270.00 for use of the storm sewer on 122 Avenue. Lot 6, SE ¼, Sec 20, Tp 12, Plan 13667, NWD o $1,215.00 for use of the sanitary sewer on 122 Avenue. • $1,270.00 for use of the storm sewer on 122 Avenue. plus interest calculated annually from the date of completion of the Extended Services as certified by the General Manager - Public Works and Development Services of the Municipality (the "Completion Date") to the date of connection by the Benefitting Lands to the Extended Services; The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality shall pursuant to Section 939 (7) of the Municipal Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 be paid to the Subdivider as provided for in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 939 (9) of the Local Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 323, The parties hereto agree as follows: The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality within ten (10) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to the Subdivider and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of June 30th and December 31st of the year in which the Latecomer Charge is collected by the Municipality. This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer Charge by the Municipality to the Subdivider, or ten (10) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the Municipality shall be forever fully released and wholly discharged from any and all liability and obligations herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer Charge, and whether arising before or after the expiry of this Agreement. Page 2 The Subdivider represents and warrants to the Municipality that the Subdivider has not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from the owner of the Benefitting Lands for the provision, or expectation of the provision of the Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein; and further represents and warrants that he has not entered into any agreement with the owner of the Benefitting Lands for consideration in any way related to or connected directly or indirectly with the provision of the Extended Services. The representations and warranties of the Subdivider herein shall, notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Agreement, survive the expiry of this Agreement. The Subdivider (if more than one corporate body or person) hereby agrees that the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in equal shares. If the Subdivider is a sole corporate body or person, the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the following (name and address of director of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.): In the event that the Subdivider is not the owner of the said lands, the owner shall hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto the Subdivider, his heirs and assigns, all rights, title and interest under this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their respective Corporate Seals, attested by the hands of their respective officers duly authorized in that behalf, the day, and year first above written. Kenneth Knuttila- Subdivider Jo-Ann Knuttila- Subdivider The Corporate Seal of the CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE was hereunto affixed in the presence of: Mayor - Authorized Signatory Corporate Officer - Authorized Signatory Page 3 District of Maple Ridge Deep koots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Disbursements for the month ended May 31, 2007 June 29. 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council has authorized all voucher payments to be approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor, together with the Director of Finance. Council authorizes the vouchers for the following period through Council resolution. The disbursement summary for the past period is attached for your information. Expenditure details are available to any Council member for review in the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION: That the "disbursements as listed below for the month ended May 31, 2007 now be approved" GENERAL $ 4,157,095 PAYROLL $ 1,119,954 PURCHASE CARD $ 81.996 $ 5,359.045 DISCUSSION: Background Context: The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan. Community Communications The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial disbursements. 1131 C) Business Plan / Financial Implications: Bynett Construction Services Community Safety Building $231,134 Total contract price: $1,799,000 Bynett Construction Services Standby Power System $312,776 Total contract price: $1,119,400 Canadian Pacific Railway culverts at 240th St. & Highway 7 $220,236 Greater Vancouver Water District water consumption Jan 31-Feb 27 $271,016 Greater Vancouver Water District water consumption Feb 28-Mar 27 $263,913 Greater Vancouver Regional District debt payment $237,006 School District No. 42 - Westview artificial turf field $203,774 d) Policy Implications: Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice. CONCLUSIONS: The disbursements for the month ended May 31. 2007 have been reviewed and are in order. Prepared by: G'Ann Rygg Accounting Clerk II Approved by: Dennis Sartorius, CA Municipal Accountant Approved b ill, BBA, CGA - CorpQrte & Finalervices • / / Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule :Chief Administrative Officer gmr CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - PERIOD 5, 2007 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT Active Network Ltd Class software maintenance fees Atomic Crayon District of Maple Ridge website Economic Development website BC Hydro Hydro charges May BC SPCA Contract May Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd Maintenance: Albion Sports Complex Greg Moore Youth Centre Harris Park Leisure Centre Merkley Park MR Lawn Bowling MR Museum Pedestrian Crossing PM Museum RCMP Annex Samuel Robertson Street lights Telosky Stadium Traffic lights Westview Sports Field Bynett Construction Services Community Safety Building Standby Power System 'UPE Local 622 Dues - pay periods 07/09 & 07/10 anadian Pacific Railway Culverts at 240th St & Highway 7 Flasher contract CEI Architecture Planning Community Safety Building Centimark Ltd Municipal Hall roof system Roof repairs Chevron Canada Ltd Fuel City Of Pitt Meadows Property Insurance 2007 Dyke bench replacement Double M Excavating Ltd North Alouette logjam Downtown Maple Ridge Business Start up funding & BIA collections EBA Engineering Consultants Industrial Avenue environmental land clean up Cottonwood landfill gas migration assessment General Paint Traffic marking paint Greater Vanc Water District Water consumption Jan 31 - Feb 27/07 Water consumption Feb 28 - Mar 27/07 Greater Vancouver Regional Dis Debt payment MR transfer station license Water sample analysis Guillevin International Inc Firefighters protective wear Firehall equipment Electrical supplies ldentica Branding program ITT Flygt Sewer flush valves Manulife Financial Employee benefits premiums laple Ridge Municipal Holdings Monthly common costs Jan-Mar viunicipal Pension Plan BC Pension remittance Nixon. Ronald Security refund Oakcreek Golf & Turf Inc Lawn sweeper AMOUNT 17,741 38,934 67,077 21,054 16,584 543,910 17,647 222,484 41,431 29,398 53,851 24,668 24,974 100,000 23,566 15,489 534,929 249,506 33,854 17,225 19,781 94,718 46,635 198,483 22,551 33,632 35.796 3.138 549 430 864 3.180 731 689 249 685 167 776 164 547 5.549 277 1.727 231.134 312176 220.236 2.248 28.241 1.157 23.441 1227 14.354 9.212 271.016 263.913 237.006 12,000 500 32.157 1.254 443 17,331 505,181 72,603 170 1,786 7., 35,022 32,116 203.774 30.000 233,774 10.706 207 864 318 278 3,341 16,437 26,195 27,840 3,478,579 678.516 4,157,095 1,119,954 81,996 5,359,045 Raven Rescue Swiftwater rescue training Receiver General For Canada Employer/Employee remit PP07/09 & 07/10 Ridgemeadows Recycling Society Monthly contract for recycling May Weekly recycling Litter pick-up contract Riteway Tree Service Ltd Spring chipping program S & A Supplies Traffic signal video systems School District #42 Westview Secondary School artificial turf field Langton Elementary playground South Ridge Mechanical Ltd Maintenance: Courthouse Curling Rink Hammond Comm. Centre Leisure Centre Municipal Hall PM Fam Rec Centre RCMP Rental Properties Terasen Gas Gas May Winvan Paving Ltd 2007 roadwork projects Disbursements In Excess $15,000 Disbursements Under $15,000 Total Payee Disbursements Payroll PP 07/10 & 07/11 Purchase Cards - Payment TOTAL PERIOD 5 2007 DISBURSEMENTS Gmz Y: Fnnce Accourtng P Remittances Dsour5ernents\2007\(Monthy Counci Report 2007.xIsIMAY0 r MAPLE RIDGE L British Columbia Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 8, 2007 and l\iembers of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: New Website Policy - Community Directory and Events Calendar Postings EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Attached is a revised Council Policy which proposes new guidelines for postings to the District website for community directory listings http://www.mapleridge.ca/EN/main/residents/events.html and public events htrp: //ww\v.mapleridge.ca/EN /main/residents/ 13728.html The previous policy dealing with guidelines for postings, Policy #5.46 Community Group Web Page & Links, is recommended for rescinding. RECOMMENDATIONS: THAT Council Policy #5.46, Community Group Web Page & Links, be rescinded; and further THAT a new policy, Community Directory and Events Calendar Postings on District of Maple Ridge Website, attached to the staff report dated June 082007, be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: in the past, the District has been approached by groups hoping to have the Municipality host their website. This was common practice in the days when having a website was fairly rare and expensive. At present, most community and business groups have their own site, or collaborate on a collective site. As well, the District used to get requests to place private links to other sites on our website. These practices had their place and time, and the District had a poicv that addressed guidelines under which a request would be considered. This current policy, Policy #5.46, Community Group Web Page & Links, is attached as Appendix 1. The conditions were fairly simple and generally included things such as the following: - the proposed site that we would host had to have a size limit, and had to be compatible in design to the District site; - material had to be short and to the point; and - the hosting or links were limited to groups affiliated with Municipal business, and did not include private businesses or personal websites. 1132 This hosting and links policy is recommended for rescinding and a new policy is proposed to take its place that reflects the renewed purpose and functioning of our new website. The proposed new policy is attached as Appendix 2. The proposed new policy deals specifically with community directory listings and events postings. It does not contemplate our website 'hosting' others. Rather, we will consider links for those that meet established guidelines. These revised guidelines allow staff responsible for managing the content of our new website to effectively reach decisions on requests for inclusion. To be considered for inclusion onto the District website, a community group or event must provide information that is factual and is deemed non-offensive, and needs to be: • A reoccurring or annual event; • Community wide events that draw a large, broad audience; • Held either in Maple Ridge or Pitt Meadows; • Generally receive District funding either through grants or sponsorship; • inclusive to all and where everyone is invited; • Of limited duration; and • Usually free. The following community groups are considered for inclusion to the District site: • Government agencies, School Board, and not-for-profit agencies that provide services to residents; • Council Advisory groups and groups formally recognized or endorsed by Mayor & Council (eg - Chamber of Commerce); • Groups supported financially by the District through operating funds, facilities or grants, such as Ridge Meadows Recycling, or community associations; • General interest organizations including: seniors, animal shelters. arts and heritage, churches, community halls, community services, special interest, special events, sports, environmental, equestrian, family services, neighbourhood groups. and for profit recreation groups that complement Parks & Leisure Services. Finally, the new policy notes that the website will not be used to support groups or events that: • Advocate positions on District issues; • Be substantially engaged in political, racial, religious or social movements; • Are corporate, commercial, or private business sites; • Are individual personal home pages. b) Desired Outcome: The purpose of this memo is to seek Council support to rescind an old website management policy, and to adopt a new policy as attached (Appendix 2). c) Alternatives: There are 2 alternative choices. First, we could continue to operate under the terms of the old policy, but that would not provide much guidance to staff in dealing with requests for inclusion to our new website. This is not recommended. Secondly, we could rescind the old policY, but not adopt a new one. This would create a situation where staff would need to consider inclusion to the community directory and events calendar on the singular merits of each request. However, this too is not recommended. To ensure clear guidelines, and consistent decision making, staff and the public require a revised policy. CONCLUSIONS: With the launch of our new website, it is important to modernize our management policies to reflect the purpose of a lean, organized, factual, and community oriented site. The two key areas of community involvement, the commumrv directory and events calendar, are the subject of the new policy guidelines, it is recommended Council adopt the new website management policy as attached (Appendix 2). r Prepared b3: ,'John Bastaja, B.A., M.R.M., Chief Information Officer N, Approved by: Paul Gill, - al ariager, Corporate and Financial Services Concurrence: J.L.rim) Rule Administrative Officer V ppendix I LE RIDGE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE IflCflOr.!Cd 12 ,eoiemlr. 1S74 TITLE: COMMUNITY GROUP WEB PAGE & LINKS POLICY NO. 5.46 APPROVAL DATE: July 10, 2001 POLICY STATEMENT: Hosting We have had many requests to host web pages for non-profit organizations and community groups; accordingly we have developed the following general guidelines: The District has established design standards for all pages that reside on our site because we require a consistent look and feel throughout. This consistency is accomplished through the use of common elements such as graphics, colour and the location and type of navigational information. Size of site will be limited to approximately one typewritten page and up to four photographs. All text for the pages must be provided to the District's Web Manager in a word document. Reading text online is difficult, keep the information short and to the point. As a general rule, photographs should be jpg format, and illustrations and drawings should be in gif format. The Web Manager will determine the size. Candidates for hosting include: - Groups supported financially by the Municipality through operating funds. facilities or grants, such as Ridge Meadows Recycling, (including Community Associations). Submissions for linking purposes must include full website addresses and the e-mail address for the contact person. We reserve the right to remove hosted pages at any time. without notice. We reserve the right to charge for hosting of pages with sufficient notice. Links The District will agree to requests to publish links from its web site to external sites provided the following criteria are satisfied: The information on the site must be factual rather than opinions or beliefs, and non-offensive. Candidates for links include: - Government agencies, school board, not-for-profit agencies that provide services to residents; - Council Advisory groups and groups formally recognized or endorsed by Mayor & Council; 4 - Groups supported financially by the Municipality through operating funds. facilities or grants, such as Ridge Meadows Recycling, (including Community Associations); - Websites of general municipal interest; - Community events of limited duration. Links will not be granted to: - Web sites advocating positions on municipal issues; - Web sites where the site or the site's sponsor is substantially engaged in political, religious or social movements; - Corporate. commercial, or business sites: - Individual personal home pages; Submissions for linking purposes must include full website addresses and the e-mail address for the contact person. We reserve the right to remove links at any time, without notice. PURPOSE: To establish guidelines for hosting web pages on our website and providing links from our website. Appendix 2 4 POLICY STATEMENT •J.JtI;iDIIl District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater He, ghts Policy No: Title: Community Directory and Events Calendar Postings on District of Maple Ridge Website Replaces: 5.46 Effective Date: Authority: Council Approval: Policy Statement: The Events Calendar, located on the District of Maple Ridge website at: www.mapleridge.ca/EN/main/residents/events.html and the Community Directors' at: www.mapleridge.ca/EN/main/residents/13728.html are intended to provide information on community associations, non-profit groups and agencies, visual and performing artists, and artisans in the District who wish to submit event announcements and contact information to the District website. All announcements are subject to the approval of the designated \Vebsite Administrator(s) and the District reserves the right to refuse any submission at the Administrators' discretion. Purpose: To set out the District's policy on postings to the Events Calendar and the Community Directors' on the District's '"ebsite in order to support the activities of groups who contribute in a positive way while adhering to certain guidelines. Definitions: Administrator(s): District of Maple Ridge employee(s) who are responsible for approving website content. District: District of Maple Ridge. Website: District of Maple Ridge website. PROCEDURE (OPERATING REGULATION) •1;Ji*iI,ItI District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights Policy No: Title: Community Directory and Events Calendar Postings on District of Maple Ridge Website Replaces: 5.46 Effective Date: Authority: Council Approval: 1.0 POLICY STATEMENT (adopted): The Events Calendar, located on the District of Maple Ridge website at: www.mapleridge.ca/EN/main/residents/events.html and the Community Directory at: www.mapleridge.ca/EN/main/residents/13728.html are intended to provide information on community associations, non-profit groups and agencies, visual and performing artists, and artisans in the District who wish to submit event announcements and contact information to the District Website. All announcements are sublect to the approval of the designated Website Administrator(s) and the District reserves the right to refuse any submission at the Administrators' discretion. 2.0 KEY AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY Responsibility: Action to Take Web Administrators Post Community Events and Community Director entries on the District of Maple Ridge website in a timely manner after reviewing for inclusion based on the following guidelines: Community Events must be: • A reoccurring event or annual event • Community wide events that draw a large broad audience • Held either in Maple Ridge or Pitt Meadows • Generally receive District funding either through grants or sponsorship • Inclusive to all and where everyone is invited • Of limited duration • Usually free Community Directory will include: • Government agencies, School Board, and not-for-profit agencies that provide services to residents • Council Advisory groups and groups formally recognized or endorsed by Mayor & Council Groups supported financially by the District through operating funds, facilities or grants, such as Ridge Meadows Recycling, (including Community Associations) General interest organizations including: seniors, animal shelters, arts and heritage, churches, community halls, community services, special interest, special events, sports, environmental, equestrian, family services, neighbourhood groups, and profit recreation groups that complement Parks & Leisure Services The District will agree to pubhsh requests for events or community listings provided the information is factual rather than opinions or beliefs, and is deemed non-offensive. The District will not knowingly approve the use of the Events Calendar or the Community Directory, to support the activities of any groups or agencies that it deems, in its absolute discretion, may intentionally, or unintentionally: • Advocate positions on District issues; • Be substantially engaged in political, racial, religious or social movements; • Are corporate, commercial, or business sites; • Are individual personal home pages; and • Contravene the Criminal Code or B.C. Human Rights legislation. I Districtof Maple Ridge •MJI1(.IeI Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: June 27, 2007 Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: Communtv Wildfire Protection Plan. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Forest fires in British Columbia have created a lot of damage in recent years and indications are that their frequency and intensity will continue to increase unless preventative steps are taken. Last year, the Union of B.C. Municipalities made a grant program available to municipalities to assist them with in developing wildfire protection plans. The District applied for the grant and it was approved, subject to a plan being developed and being endorsed by Municipal Council. The Community Wild Fire Protection plan has been completed and it identifies and quantifies the risks that we are facing. Further, recommendations have been provided as to specific actions that should be considered. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the plan and to seek Council's support in principle. This will allow us to fulfill our obligations with respect to the grant that has already been authorized and will allow us to make application for a further grant to assist in the development of a detailed implementation plan. This implementation plan will include a cost/benefit analysis, which Council can consider as part of its normal business planning cycle. RECOMMENDATION(S): That the recommendations contained in the Community Wildfire Protection Plan be adopted in principle pending the development of a detailed implementation plan with an associated financial plan which will be brought back to council for their consideration and adoption. That staff be instructed to make application to the Union of BC Municipalities for grant funding to develop an implementation plan for the Community Wildfire Protection Plan recommendations. 1133 DISCUSSION: Background Context: Southwest British Columbia is susceptible to fires caused by natural forces and by humans. More specific to Maple Ridge. about óOCYo of our geographic area is forested. Further, significant forests sit on our boundaries. While our overall risk could be described as "low to moderate" with respect to the probability of a wild fire, the consequences of such a fire would be "high to extreme". A Wildfire Risk Management System (\VRMS) was developed to identify key areas of risk within the community and to support the development of a Community Wildfire Protection Plan. In total, 19 recommendations were developed. They are categorized into five broad categories: Communication and Education. Structure Protection, Emergency Response, Training and Post Fire Rehabilitation. Some of the recommendations will be quite easy to implement while others will take longer. It is important that we go through a detailed cost/benefit analysis on each of these and that is the focus of the next phase of this project. Desired Outcome(s): To reduce the incidence and severity of urban interface fires. Strategic Alignment The recommendations of the Community Wildfire Protection Plan support the basic tenants of creating a safe and livable community and are in alignment with council's desire for the fire department to develop proactive mitigation strategies as opposed to the traditional reactive measures. Interdepartmental Implications: The Community Wildfire Protection Plan was developed in cooperation and consultation with several municipal departments and the implementation plan will involve a similar process. A consultant will be enlisted to complete the majority of the implementation plan thereby reducing the amount of staff time required. Business Plan/Financial Implications: Council's adoption in principle of the Community Wildfire Protection Plan recommendations will enable staff to receive the funds made available by the Union of BC Municipalities through a previously awarded grant. \\'ith Council's approval staff will also apply for a new grant to fund 500,0 of the costs of developing an implementation plan. This implementation plan will include a cost/benefit analysis, which Council can consider as part of its normal business planning cycle. 1) Policy Implications: The development of an implementation plan will include recommendations on existing bylaws, policies and procedures that need to be revised and/or developed. CONCLUSIONS: \Vhile our overall risk could be described as "low to moderate" with respect to the probability of a wild fire, the consecuences of such a Lie could be "high to extreme". Based on the fire risk analysis, it would be prudent to develop an implementation plan for the recommendations contamed in the Community Wildfire Protection Plan. This implementation plan will include a cost/benefit analysis, which Council can consider as part of its normal business lanning cycle. Prepared by: 7Pet,rootendorst, Fire Chief - Director of Operations Approved b): Paul ill, General ManeCoorate and Financial Services / . condllrrence: J .L.,jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: July 4, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Rick Laferriere, Business Ret. & Exp. ATTN: COW SUBJECT: Economic Advisory Commission Bylaw Amendment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Economic Advisory Commission, under by law No. 6179-2003, has an operating composition of 11 Commissioners. The Commissioners are appointed by Council and are people who reside or own a business in Maple Ridge, with an interest in the economic development of the community. Of the 11 positions, the following 6 seats are pre-determined and appointments (excepting the Mayor) are appointed by the organization. Mayor of Maple Ridge One Maple Ridge Councillor Chamber of Commerce Representative Tourism Representative Arts Council Representative RMHBBA Representative An amendment to the bylaw is proposed that would change the composition to 12 members and pre- determined seats are as follows: Mayor of Maple Ridge Two Maple Ridge Councillors Chamber of Commerce Representative Tourism Representative Arts Council Representative Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association The additional member is from Council and this is to recognize the fact that two Councils have been present at EAC meetings for a few years and ensures Council's voice is represented if one member is absent. The Home Based Business Association no longer exists and it is proposed that the Downtown BIA be represented on the EAC. The recommended appointments will be made in a subsequent report. RECOMMENDATION: THAT BYLAW NO. 6491-2007 BE GIVEN FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD READINGS. 1134 DISCUSSION: Background Context: Council has established an Economic Advisory Commission to provide advice on strategic economic development initiatives. The Commission was established under a District bylaw which describes the composition, duties and responsibilities of the body. The EAC serves the following mandate: • Advise Council on any matters relating to the long term economic health of the community that may be referred to it. • Provide input into an economic development strategy for the District of Maple Ridge for Council's consideration. • Contribute to the development of an annual business plan for the Department and relevant performance measures to evaluate programs • Participate in the execution of the business plan, as determined by Council. Since officially beginning work in 2005, the EAC has worked with the Department in completing the development of a long term economic strategy that has been adopted by Council. With Council's focus on the three pillars of sustainability the inclusion of an additional Councillor will add increased value to both Council and the EAC in their respective roles. Since 2005, organizations actively involved in the community have changed, with the home- based business organization no longer existing and the creation of a new Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association (DMRBIA). Council's support for downtown development and the interest and request of the DMRBIA to be involved on the EAC builds on the positive linkages between all business organizations and economic development. Desired Outcome(s): The revised EAC structure will allow for an increased level of input from the Business community, increase linkages between Council and the EAC. The inclusion of the transition year will allow the EAC to achieve a balance between new and existing Commissioners. This will lead to both consistency and revitalization with respect to the structure of the EAC, as well as allow for the retention of knowledge and development of ideas for Maple Ridge to reach its full economic potential. Strategic Alignment: The inclusion of the DMRBIA will lead to greater interaction and shared goals between all organizations involved in the EAC and Council. Conclusions: The EAC, under the revised bylaw, will continue to provide support to Council. Approved by: Rick ntion & Expansion Officer, Economic Development Concurren/ J.L. (Jim) Rule 7 Chief Administrative Officer RL CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6491-2007 A Bylaw to Amend the Maple Ridge Economic Advisory Commission Bylaw No. 6179 - 2003 NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This Bylaw may be cited as the "Maple Ridge Economic Advisory Commission Amending Bylaw No. 6491 - 2007". That Maple Ridge Economic Advisory Commission Bylaw No. 6179-2003, be amended by: Deleting Section 4 in its entirety and replacing it with the following: Section 4 "The Economic Advisory Commission ("EAC") is composed of twelve Commissioners" Deleting Section 6(b) in its entirety and replacing it with the following: Section 6(b) "Two Councillors of the District of Maple Ridge" Deleting Section 6(e) in its entirety and replacing it with the following: Section 6(e) "Director of the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association" Deleting Section 7 in its entirety and replacing it with the following: Section 7 "The Chairpersons of the Chamber of Commerce, Maple Ridge Downtown Business Improvement Association, Tourism Society and Arts Council will be requested to forward the name of a Maple Ridge Director of their organization to serve on the EAC for consideration by Council. Advertisements will be placed in the local paper requesting applications from District residents or business owners for the five community member positions." Deleting Section 9 (a) in its entirety and replacing it with the following: Section 9(a) "The term of appointment for each Commissioner is two years, commencing September 1 in the year they are appointed and terminating two years later on. August 31." Economic Advisory Commission Bylaw No. 6491-2007 Page 2 of 2 (f) Deleting Sections 9(c) in its entirety and replacing it with the following: Section 9(c) "Transition Clause - In order to stagger the terms of appointment in the EAC, two Commissioners will be appointed to serve a one year term beginning September 1, 2007 and terminating August 31, 2008. All other Commissioners will be appointed to serve a term beginning September 1, 2007 expiring August 31, 20 09." READ a FIRST TIME the day of , 200. READ a SECOND TIME the day of , 200. READ a THIRD TIME the day of , 200. RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of , 200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER District of Maple Ridge u,J'iI.Ic1 Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: June 19, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: SUBJECT: FRASER VALLEY REGIONAL LIBRARY (FVRL) 2008 BUDGET EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Councilor Daykin will be attending a Fraser Valley Regional Library Board meeting shortly to discuss the 2008 budget. The intent of this memorandum is to obtain direction prior to Councilor Daykin's attendance at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION: That the input to the Fraser Valley Regional Library System budget outlined in the 2007-06-19 memorandum on this subject be endorsed noting that Council will have a further opportunity for input prior to final adoption of the budget. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: As Council is aware the Regional Library function is established by legislation and the District of Maple Ridge is a member of the Fraser Valley Regional Library system. Council appoints one Council member to represent the District at the FVRL Board meetings. Each year the library board requests approval of its annual budget. Past practice in Maple Ridge is that the Library Board representative discusses the budget first with Maple Ridge Council. Council will also be aware that the library levy appears separately on the property tax bill. The attached correspondence raises a number of questions. Staff suggest the following responses: The current operating hours are satisfactory: Monday to Friday 10:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Sunday 1:00 - 5:00 p.m. (school year) Closed Statutory Holidays Staffing levels are appropriate Equipment levels are appropriate (Maple Ridge installed a self check-in system several years ago) No facility modifications or expansions are required at this time. C:\Documents and Settinga\amandaga\Local Settmgs\Temporarv Internet Files\0LK40B\CR FVRL 2008 Budget.doc #2 1151 With respect to the budget staff suggest the business plan guidelines recently adopted by Council be forwarded to FVRL for information. Desired Outcome: The desired outcome with respect to this proposed budget is to provide library services with service level direction prior to developing the 2008 budget. Strategic Alignment: Providing easily accessible library services contributes greatly to Maple Ridge achieving its goal of being a safe and livable community. Citizen/Customer Implications: Staff have not received any complaints related to the Library in terms of the hours of operations or services available. Business Plan/Financial Implications: This is the first step in the budget review process. Council will have another opportunity for input at the point of the FVRL considering the proposed 2008 budget. CONCLUSIONS: The citizen response to the public library has been very positive since its opening in 2001. We have not received any complaints about the household levy or service standards since that time. I Prepared bi': Mike Murray, eneral Manager Community D elopment, Parks & Recreation Services Approved hi'. Pau"GiI1, BBA, CGA General Manager: Corporate and Financial Services -/. Concurrence: Ji/. (Jim) Rule çfiief Administrative Officer MM:ik I:\7700 Reci-eation\7960 Librarv\CR FVRL 2008 Budget.doc #2 h FVRL FRASER VALLEY REGIONAL LIBRARY Administrative Centre 1 34589 Delair Road I Abbotsford, BC I V2S 5Y1 Tel: 604-859-7141 1 Toll-free: 1-888-668-4141 I Fax: 604-852-5701 June 12, 2007 ( \ç) I ! JJ MAYOR M&C VAO M 0th e Action Mayor Gordon Robson and Council District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Dear Mayor Robson and Council: RE: BUDGET PLANNING FOR 2008 LIBRARY SERVICES Once again, Fraser Valley Regional Library is beginning the budget planning process and is seeking your input in order to meet the District of Maple Ridge's needs for library services in 2008. This is the time when we need to know what your community would like to see at your library, particularly the services that affect the District of Maple Ridge's assessment. For example: • the days of the week the library is open, including Sundays; • the hours of operation, including Sundays; • staffing levels to enable expanded programming opportunities; • additional equipment requirements, such as computers or self checkouVself check-in equipment; • possible facility modifications or expansions. Perhaps your community wishes to augment other aspects of library services in 2008. Also, please advise us of any budget constraints that we should consider as we prepare the 2008 budget. For example, it would help us in our planning if we knew the real growth rate that your community is using for budget planning, as well as the targeted property tax increase that Council is considering. I would be happy to receive your input by email (mary.ocallaghan@fvrl.bc.ca ) and, at your request, to meet with you in person to discuss these services. To optimize budget planning for 2008, kindly direct your response to my attention by July 13, 2007. Mayor Gordon Robson and Council District of Maple Ridge June 12, 2007 Page 2 I look forward to hearing from you as we work together to provide library services that enrich your residents and enhance your community. Sincerely, /1"7w- co Ia4~4- Mary O'Callaghan, CMA Director of Finance Copy to: Mr. Jim Rule, Chief Administrative Officer, District of Maple Ridge Mr. Paul Gill, General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services, District of Maple Ridge 6 im ow=kw CORPORATION OF THE MAPLE RIDGE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: July 4th , 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Local Area Service Petition for the Provision of a Municipal Service EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On February 27th, 2007 Council directed Municipal staff to work with representatives from the Maple Crest subdivision to further detail the maintenance costs, and hold an open house meeting for the benefiting property owners to get informed about the proposed "local service area" for the maintenance of their enhanced landscaped areas, prior to signing a formal petition for this service. The open house was held on May 17th, 2007 and a formal petition was delivered to the Municipality on June 7th, 2007. As the petition has been determined to be sufficient pursuant to the Community Charter, Council approval is requested for this Local Area Service to proceed. RECOMMENDATION(S): That Local Area Service to the properties outlined in bold type attached to the report dated June 14, 2007, as formally petitioned for an estimated cost of $60.56 per year which is to be levied on the benefiting property owners in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Local Area Service Policy" be authorized; and further That Maple Crest Enhanced Landscape Maintenance Bylaw No. 6493-2007 be given first, second and third reading. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Following the direction of Council at their meeting of February 27th 2007, staff arranged an open house meeting with residents of this neighbourhood on May 17th 2007. More than fifty residents attended this meeting to discuss the proposed local area service for the maintenance of enhanced landscape areas in this subdivision. Staff described the public landscaped areas that would be included in the scope of service for the local area, the process to achieve this and a history of the previous initiative that was defeated by residents in 2002. Maps and photographs of specific landscape features to be included in the local area service were on display to help describe the proposal. Some residents questioned why there was a need for this additional levy, and staff described the level of park space that has been provided in this subdivision by the development company and how it has been enhanced beyond the level that is enjoyed by other neighbourhoods in the community. Staff indicated that there are areas of the subdivision that have not been maintained since being installed and that it will take time to restore these areas. 1152 A formal petition was available for residents to sign which indicated the initial annual cost for the local area service would be assessed to each property in the amount of $60.56. Collection of this levy would begin with the 2008 property tax assessment. Subsequent to the information meeting residents have circulated the formal petition and have gatherer the support of more than 60% of existing property owners in the local service area. Desired Outcome: The property owners within this subdivision have expressed a desire to establish a local area service for the maintenance of enhanced landscape areas. 'Local Area Service' provision with the BC Community Charter enables these properties to be provided with a municipal service upon agreement of the majority (50%) of the owners of the benefiting properties to contribute their respective share of the costs. The property owners in the benefiting area (please see attached sketch) have submitted a formal petition for a Local Area (landscape maintenance) Service. The petition has been certified to be 'sufficient' in accordance with the provisions within the BC Community Charter. Citizen/Customer Implications: The cost of the petitioned service is $60.56 per residential lot within the benefiting area. There are currently 191 fee simple single family residential lots and one property currently under development that on completion will contain 104 strata lots. On completion of development there will be 295 properties contributing to the cost for this local area service. Interdepartmental Implications: The Property Tax section of the Finance Department will impose the cost of this service as a levy and place the notation on the tax roll of the benefiting property owners. CONCLUSIONS: The strong support registered by the residents who have signed the petition and the positive comments from those attending the open house meeting suggest that the residents would like to see this initiative proceed. It is recommended that Maple Crest Enhanced Landscape Maintenance Bylaw No. 6493-2007 be 'riven first, second and third reading. Prepared by: Bruce McLeod, Manager of Par s and Open Space Approved by: S u e Wh r, Diqtorof o un erv es Concurrence: W. (Jim) Rule 5lhief Administrative Officer CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6493-2007 A by-law to authorize a municipal service to maintain enhanced landscape areas; to define the benefiting lands; and to establish that the cost of the municipal service shall be borne by the owners of real property within such defined area. WHEREAS Council has been petitioned to provide a municipal service pursuant to Section 210, Division 5 of the Community Charter S.B.C. 2003, c.26 (the "Community Charter"); AND WHEREAS the Municipal Clerk has certified that the petition received for the municipal service does constitute a sufficient petition signed by majority of the owners, representing at least half of the value of the parcels that are liable to be specially charged; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to proceed with the works; AND WHEREAS the 'Maple Ridge Local Area Service Policy', as amended, provides that the cost of providing a municipal service shall be recoverable from each of the existing parcels of land and future strata lot plans specifically Lot A BCP 25215 that will benefit from the service. NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This By-law shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Crest Enhanced Landscape Maintenance By-law No. 6494-2007". The contents of Schedules "A", "B", "C","D" and "E" attached hereto are hereby declared to be made an integral part of this Bylaw The local service area of the District for the benefit of which the enhanced areas are to be maintained as a municipal service is defined as the area outlined in bold in the attached Schedule "C'. The Manager of Parks and Open Space has compiled a report and estimate for the annual charge in Schedule "A" for the maintenance of the enhanced landscape areas to the standard in Schedule "B" as indicated for the areas in the attached Schedules "D" and "E". This bylaw shall take effect as of the date of adoption hereof. READ a first time the day of 2007. READ a second time the day of 2007. READ a third time the day of 2007. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of 2007. MAYOR CLERK CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE CREST ENHANCED LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BY-LAW NO. 6493-2007 Schedule "A" Class of Work: The establishment, maintenance and replacement of landscape areas and park equipment to the classification level depicted in Schedule "B" in the area indicated and by bold outline on Schedule "C". In the case of this project, the maintenance standard is Class 2 The Annual Charge: The Annual Charge is based on a per lot basis of sixty dollars and fifty six cents ($60.56) per year starting in 2008. The charges established under this Bylaw shall be specifically charged against the parcels benefiting from the work, payable by a per lot basis levied year by year. The Annual Charge Adjustment: The annual charge will be adjusted annually to reflect any increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Vancouver B.C. for the immediately preceding year commencing with 2009 as provided by Statistics Canada. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE CREST ENHANCED LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BY-LAW NO. 6493-2007 Schedule "B" Landscape Maintenance Standards Landscaped areas shall be classified as: Class 2 This classification of maintenance is a medium service level and differs from Class 1 level of maintenance by the frequency of visits to the site for maintenance purposes. Class 1 maintenance level is applied where there are formal display beds of annual plants with a back drop of fine lawn areas. Class 2-Level of Service Mowing and Trimmin Grassed areas shall be mowed and trimmed bi-weekly between April 151h1 and October 1 5th Shrub Bed Maintenance All shrub beds shall be maintained to include weed removal four (4) times and shrub pruning once per annum. Replacement of any dead or missing plant material shall be subject to available fund in this Local Service Area Reserve. Tree Pruning Trees shall be inspected once a year for pruning requirements and pruned as required in accordance with a continuous rotation program of pruning. Street Trees are a District wide municipal service and therefore need not be included in the Local Service Area Bylaw. The District of Maple Ridge appreciates residents watering the trees during periods of drought, however all other maintenance including pruning shall only be undertaken by the District. Repairs Repairs shall be carried out when necessary to restore damaged or failing grass areas. Trail Maintenance Trails shall be inspected four (4) times annually to identify necessary repairs to washouts and other hazards that may impact the safe use of the trails. Vegetation is to be trimmed to within 0.6 metres of either side of the trail. The trails are intended for a passive recreational use and their appearance shall reflect this type of use. LL —&2c. Oi< Q) Q) . Q) 0 . QL •: -J U) Bulb out landscape areas MAW-9 --a- ___ :• •1 - - y ( = B ,29.. A-~;k ; \ - 1:1250m Pedestrian PiaIkway 9v Additional Landscape Areas to be included in the Local Service Area Bylaw SCHEDULE 0 I,tha,:((?d LimIsciie Areas 0 1:1250m Schedule "E" Enhanced Landscape Areas II Ii IC g C LEGEND: Itons m&nthinedby.joh,, 6 Z), owaw CORPORATION OF THE MAPLE RiDGE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: July 3', 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Report on Prison Work Crews EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Since the Policy on the Use of Prison Work Crews was adopted by Council in 2003, the District of Maple Ridge has received the benefit of using this labour force to carry out park maintenance activities, and to provide support for work projects coordinated by several volunteer organizations. Some program statistics have been recorded based on the activities of the work crews for the first quarter of 2007 that offer an indication of the number of man hours this resource provides to the community. This information is offered to show an estimated annual value that accrues to the District through one work crew participating in this work program. RECOMMENDATION: No resolution is required DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The District has used supervised "open custody" inmate work crews by following the Policy adopted by Council in 2003. The policy defines "Approved Corrections Branch procedure for the selection of inmates who may serve on open custody work crews". Inmates who serve in open custody are assessed by BC Corrections to determine: He or she is at minimal risk of attempting to escape He or she has no recent history of pattern of violent behaviour He or she is not a sex offender or a violent offender He or she has demonstrated through their cooperation and effort at the institution that they pose no operational security concerns It is important to recognize that not all inmates can meet these selection criteria, or are willing to participate in the work programs. A shortage of candidates can occur when the proportion of remand inmates, those who have re-offended and returned, is high. During these cycles there are fewer inmates willing to participate in the work program. Generally when remand rates are lower there are more inmates willing to work in either the correction shops or off site in "open custody". 1153 During the first quarter one twelve man crew worked in various municipal parks to assist in preparing these areas for public use. With the severe winter weather there was a significant amount of tree debris that had fallen and the crew piled this debris for collection by Parks staff. Other work involved grass trimming, removing blackberry growth, raking of paths and annual clean up of the Campsite. The crew is transported in the Corrections vehicle with their own tools and equipment to the site. This one crew working in municipal parks contributed an average of 886 man hours per month during the first quarter. If we apply temporary or time duration labourer rates to these hours, an estimated value for the work by one crew would be approximately $265,000 over one year. In addition there are other crews that work in the community assisting volunteer organizations, (The Agricultural Fair Board, Haney Horsemen, ARMS) with work related to the annual Home Show/Fair/Halloween events at the Fairgrounds, trail maintenance, stream stewardship, fisheries/fish hatchery, and adopt a block type clean up of natural areas. Crews have also done extensive work to remove invasive species like Himalayan blackberry from planting sites selected by the Community Ecosystem Restoration Initiative (CERI) project. Crews are also called upon to assist on special "one off' Park projects, such as the Whonnock Lake temporary sandbag dam installation during June 2007. In preparation for the spring freshet crews assisted the Katzie First Nation with sandbag operations in May 2007. Through these various work programs with up to four crews at work at one time the District receives a significant benefit for the community. Participation by the inmates in these programs provides the opportunity to, engage in constructive activities, promote a sense of responsibility, and develop positive work habits. In addition the inmates are allowed to make reparative contributions to the community that offset costs to local governments. CONCLUSIONS: The contribution to the District by participation in this program is significant, both as value to the community and value in the opportunities inmates can develop as positive steps towards responsible behavour. The District should continue to support the work of the Corrections Branch in this endeavor. Prepared by: Bruce McLeod, Manager of Parks and Open Space I - f• Jf1_/L..- Approye1': Sue Wheeler, Director ommunity Services En Concurrence: JIL. (Jim) Rule hief Administrative Officer • Identifies key elements of a Protection Plan • Provides background information to support the Protection Plan • Provides recommendations addressing each element Probability * - oti'e Risks - S1,Wegk 2 PROBABII lii X CONSEQt1LN( F Al ft 3 P •1 I It P55 FIRE POST FIRE WIdland Urban Interface Con inuum r1 Interface defined as.. Where the Forest meets the Community' Interface vs Interm ix Intermix Interface r r: TspotFireRisk p 4 4 Tf 5 J ----- iwv tIli II 1. Firebrand caused ignitions: structure I r. 1 Interface fires frequently vehelm firefighting resources. The key to resolving the problem is working together. 7 Building Code and Bylaw Issues r I -I !4! - - i1 / 7 (T.. H ,. 7 f: • A. 7 1 7 That the recommendations contained in the Community Wildfire Protection Plan be adopted in principle pending the development of a detailed implementation plan with an associated financial plan which will be brought back to council for their consideration and adoption. That staff be instructed to make application to the Union of BC Municipalities for grant funding to develop an implementation plan for the Community Wildfire Protection Plan recommendations. 10 I I I DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE WILDFIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM I I I I I I I . . j I - -- S C . ..,,,.- '. -.,ip_' - j 77 •'i • '' .:Ci i - f. t . S •• •P.è: -- -: •- • -•. . - . . -4 Li I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. August, 2006 I - R.A. Blackwell I & Associates Ltd. 11 I I I I I I DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE WILDFIRE RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM An Assessment of Risk in Terms of the Probability and Consequence of Wildfire Occurrence Within in the District of Maple Ridge I I I I I I I I I I I I II B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. DRAFT Submitted by: B.A. Blackwell and Associates Ltd. 3087 Hoskins Road North Vancouver, B.C. V7J 3B5 Submitted to: Peter Grootendorst, Chief Director of Operations and Staff Development District of Maple Ridge Fire Department 22703 Dewdney Trunk Rd. Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 3K3 July 2006 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System I Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 WILDFIRE RISK MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................... 1 3.0 THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE AND SURROUNDING AREA .................................................... 2 I 4.0 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................... 4.1 Overview......................................................................................................................................... 3 3 4.2 Development of Probability Theme ............................................................................................ 7 I 4.2.1 Probability of Ignition Component ............................................................................... 4.2.2 Fire Behaviour Component ............................................................................................ 7 9 4.2.3 Suppression Response Capability Component ......................................................... 14 4.3 Development of Consequence Theme ...................................................................................... 17 I 4.3.1 Recreation Use Component ......................................................................................... 17 4.3.2 Air Quality Component ................................................................................................ 18 I 4.3.3 Visual Quality Component .......................................................................................... 21 4.3.4 Urban interface Component ........................................................................................ 22 4.3.5 Biodiversity Component .............................................................................................. 25 1 5.0 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 5.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 26 I 5.2 Data Quality Issues ...................................................................................................................... 5.2.1 Fuel Typing .................................................................................................................... 28 28 6.0 APPLICATIONS IN THE FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE • • 7.0 RIDGE .......................................................................................................................................................... ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................ 31 31 8.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................. 31 I 9.0 APPENDIX 1: WRMS MODEL SUBCOMPONENT RATING SCALES AND WEIGHTS .............. 33 9.1 Probability Component Tables .................................................................................................. 33 I 10.0 9.2 Consequence Component Tables .............................................................................................. APPENDIX 2: THE WILDFIRE IGNITION PROBABILITY PREDICTION SYSTEM (WIPPS)....... 36 39 I I I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page i 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System List of Figures Figure 1. Conceptual representation of risk assessment/management as the resultant of two factors, Probability and Consequence ...................................................................................................... 2 I Figure 2. Overview of the study area. ..................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3. District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System (WRMS) model structure. ................. 4 I Figure 4. Component level rating example: Suppression Response Capability. ............................................... Figure 5. Probability of Ignition component and associated subcomponents. .................................................. 5 9 Figure 6. Fire Behaviour component and associated subcomponents for the 90% percentile I July/August weather conditions applying a windspeed of 16 km/h.................................. Figure 7. Graphic that shows factors affecting spotting. .................................................................................... Figure 8. Map showing the polygon assignment of spotting distances based on fuel type, and fire 11 13 behaviour potential for a 9-km/h windspeed. ........................................................................ 14 Figure 9. Suppression response capability component and associated subcomponents . .............................. 16 I Figure 10. Recreation Use component................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 11. Air Quality component and associated subcomponents.................................................................. 21 I Figure 12. Visual Quality component.................................................................................................................... Figure 13. Urban Interface component and associated subcomponents. ......................................................... 22 24 Figure14. Biodiversity component. ....................................................................................................................... 25 I Figure 15. Summary mapping outputs from the District Wildfire Risk Management System. .................... Figure 16. Final overlay of probability and consequence. .................................................................................. 26 27 Figure 17. Initialized weights on all components. ............................................................................................... 28 Figure 18. Comparison of original MOF fuel typing (top) and updated fuel typing (bottom) for the I District. .......................................................................................................................................... 30 List of Tables Table 1. Overview of Methods, Databases and Sub-Models for each Subcomponent of the District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System .....................................................................6 I I I Li I I Li II B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page ii 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System 1.0 Introduction In 2006 the District of Maple Ridge, hereinafter referred to as 'the District', began the development a Wildfire Risk Management System (WRMS). Wildfire is a natural disturbance agentin the forests that surround the District and has the potential to negatively impact social and economic stability, and environmental quality. Historically the mid to low elevation stands in this area have been exposed to high severity stand replacement wildfire that has the potential to significantly alter the forests adjacent to and within the District. The probability of large wildfires within this community is considered low to moderate, and the consequences associated with a large wildfire could be devastating. This report documents the methods and results of the WRMS analysis for the District. I This project builds on the wildfire threat analysis methodology that was initially pioneered in Australia (Muller 1993, Vodopier and Haswell 1995) and has since been adapted for use in British Columbia in a number of different contexts and scales (Hawkes and Beck 1997, I Blackwell et al. 2003). In previous applications, all fire related factors (fire risk, suppression response capability, fire behaviour, and values at risk) were related equally without consideration of formal risk management theory. The revised system developed for this project I adopts a risk management approach to guide the quantification of separate and discrete landscape-level probability and consequence ratings, using the same underlying data attributes. The resultant Wildfire Risk Management System better enables fire and forest managers to I design strategies and tactics for fire management that vary from high probability-low consequence to low probability-high consequence fire risks across the landscape. I 2.0 Wildfire Risk Management U Definitions of the term "risk" and all its derivatives (i.e., risk management, risk assessment, risk evaluation) are inconsistent in the wildfire literature, perhaps as a legacy of the fact that most wildfire research has been broken down into specialty topics such as fire behaviour, fire effects, andfire history/occurrence. For the purposes of the WRMS, wildfire risk is defined as the probability and consequence of wildfire at a specified location under specified conditions. This definition is consistent with the generic definition of risk and its derivative terms being adopted in many jurisdictions worldwide (Canadian Standards Association 1997, Council of Standards Australia/New Zealand 1999, International Standards Organization 2002). Analytically, the WRMS approach to wildfire risk assessment provides a spatial characterization of risk based on probability and consequence ratings. In other words, the I WRMS can indicate, at any given location and under specified conditions, what the probability of wildfire occurring is and, for a given wildfire behaviour, what the potential consequences on valued resources are. I In other fields of risk management (e.g., hazardous materials management), a single resultant quantification of probability and consequence is often derived mathematically. However, in the I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 1 7/3/2007 Probability District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System case of wildfire risk assessment it has been found more useful to keep these elements separate, since they may imply different management approaches spatially. Figure 1 shows how various combinations of probability and consequence can imply the basic management strategies. In practice, the implementation of this risk management approach requires a detailed spatial examination of assessment results across a full continuum from low to high ratings. Assessed Risks — — — — — — Management Strategies Probability ) gcitIoi ring L on seq uen cc (EH) If IS Q~~ II,çh Consequence I I I I Figure 1. Conceptual representation of risk assessment/management as the resultant of two factors, Probability and Consequence 3.0 The District of Maple Ridge and Surrounding Area The project study area includes the District of Maple Ridge (28,675 ha) and the surroanding 5 km perimeter (Figure 2). Elevations range from 0 to 1,642 meters. Forests in the lower elevations include western hemlock, amabilis fir, western red-cedar, Douglas-fir, lodgepole pine, big-leaf maple, red alder, black cottonwood and paper birch. With increasing elevation, yellow cedar and mountain hemlock become dominant tree species. In the harsh climate of the highest elevations, vegetation consists of herbs, lichens, and scattered low alpine shrubs and trees. Wildfire is a natural disturbance agent in a portion of this heavily forested, coastal landscape. Historically these areas have been exposed to low frequency (300-600 years), high severity stand replacement fires (Green et ci. 1998). Although the probability of large wildfires within the study area is considered generally low, the consequences associated with a large wildfire could be devastating to both the District and adjacent municipalities. Air quality, urban interface, recreation use, timber value, visual quality and biodiversity are important values that must be considered in a wildfire risk assessment of the District and surrounding area. I I I I I I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 2 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System STUDY AREA c:1 Maple Ridge A[V I \f\ :(1 / / T Ir / L, 1 - I i 0 1.25 2.5 5 Kilometers Figure 2. Overview of the study area. In recent years, fire management within the study area has focused on initial attack and all wildfires have been actively suppressed. 4.0 Methods 4.1 Overview The purpose of this WRMS was to create a spatial representation of all factors that influence the probability and consequence of wildfire in the study area. The basic model structure was similar to the one used in 2004 in the Greater Vancouver Watersheds (GVWD) (Blackwell and Ohison, 2004) and in 2005 in the Resort Municipality of Whistler; it was further developed and refined through a workshop with District staff. The model was implemented in a GIS B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 3 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System environment using ArcMap 8.2.1 (ESRI) and Arclnfo 8.0.2 (ESRI) using a raster grid at 50m by 50m cell resolution. The final WRMS model structure is portrayed in Figure 3. The final spatial probability rating was derived from three major components: Ignition Probability, Fire Behaviour, and Suppression Response Capability. The final spatial consequence rating was derived from six major components that were significant within the study area: Air Quality, Timber Value, Urban Interface, Recreation Use, Visual Quality and Biodiversity. Each main model component was in turn derived from several subcomponents as shown in the Figure 3. PROBABILITY RATING CONSEQUENCE RATING Probability Fire Suppression Recreation Air Visual Urban Biodiversity of Ignition Behaviour Capability Use Quality Quality Interfa Ignition Fire Intensity Constraints to Proximity to Parks Population Visual Quality Interface High Value Potential Detection Centers Biodiversity Areas I Human Rate of Proximity to Special Smoke I Production Infrastructure I Caused Fire Spread Water Sources Features Potential I Lightning Crown Fraction Terrain Smoke Watershs Caused Fire Burned Steepness Venting Potential I Air Tanker Monthly Smoke Arrival Time Venting Index Proximity to Roads Figure 3. District of Maple Ridge Wildtre Risk Management System (WRMS) model structure. At the subcomponent level, individual ratings for each raster cell were developed on 0-10 scales based on existing biophysical databases and, in some cases, the application of sub-models (e.g., rate of fire spread calculated using the Canadian Fire Behaviour Prediction System and spatial fuel inventory data). An overview of each subcomponent method, database source and/or sub- model is provided in Table 1. At the component level, the rating for each raster cell was calculated as a weighted sum of all its subcomponents. Figure 4 provides an example of the rating scales and subcomponent weighting for the Suppression Response Capability component. All other components were derived in a similar B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 4 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II Terrain Steepness Indicator of the difficulty of control/contain on the landscape. slope Class % >60 10 I 40% 41 - 60 7 0 21 -40 3 0-20 Proximityto Roads Indicator of the ability to get suppression resources into an area: based on a bush walking rate of 1 km / hour, minutes >120 10 1 10% 61 - 120 7 0 31 - 60 5 16-30 3 0-15 Figure 4. Component level rating example: Suppression Response Capability. B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 5 I I I I I I I I I II 7/3/2007 I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System manner (see Appendix 1). Similarly, at the overall rating level for probability or consequence, the rating for each raster cell was calculated as a weighted sum of all its components. Wildfire Risk Management Component: Suppression Response Capability The Suppression component provides a rating of the probability that a wildtire could be quickly exterminated in a given location given existing resources. The rating is calculated as a weighted sum rating using five attributes: Contraints to Detection, Proximity to Water Sources, Air Tanker Arrival Time, Terrain Steepness, and Proximity to Roads Component Attributes: Attribute Indicator / Units Rating Scale Weight Constraints to Detection Indicator of the ability to detect a fire: reconnaissance at higher elevations is often constrained by cloud cover. elevation metres > 1900 10 10% 1401-1900 7 900-1400 2 Proximity to Water Sources Indicator of the ability to access water quickly for fire fighting. Based on distance from all season Streams and lakes. distance metres >300 10 _ I 10% 101-300 7 0-100 2 Air Tanker Arrival Time Indicator of time for air tanker action measured as flight time (concentric) from nearest tanker base (300k1hr) minutes >40 10 I 30% 31 - 40 (200km) 7 0 21 - 30 (150km) 5 11-20)100km) 3 0-10(50km) District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Table 1. Overview of Methods, Databases and Sub-Models for each Suhcomponent of the District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Component Subcomponent Overview Method Database/Sub-Model Ignition Potential Calculation based on fuel type and fire Wildfire l9nition Probability weather indices Predictor Inverse distance weighted interpolation - ESRI Spatial Analyst2 Probability Lightning of the number of lightning fire ignition - Ministry of Forests fire of Ignition Caused Fire points (since 1950) within a 500m records buffer Human Caused Inverse distance weighted interpolation of - ESRI Spatial Analyst2 Fire the number of human tire ignition points - Ministry of Forests fire (since 1950) within a SOOm buffer records D) Fire Intensity Calculation using fire weather, fuel type Fire Behaviour Predictor 973 and topography Fire Rate of Spread Calculation using fire weather, fuel type Fire Behaviour Predictor 973 ' Behaviour and topography Crown Fraction Calculation using fire weather, fuel type Fire Behaviour Predictor 973 0 Burned and topography 0. Constraints to Average elevation above valley bottom TRIM Detection of forest inventory polygon Proximity to Buffer distance from determinant TRIM Water Sources streams and lakes Suppression Response Air Tanker Measured flight time (concentric) from Protection Branch data Capability Arrival Time air tanker base Terrain Average slope of forest inventory TRIM Steepness polygon Proximity to Buffer distance from roads TRIM and District of Maple Roads Ridge_inventory Recreation Provincial, GVRD and Municipal park Provincial and GVRD park Use Parks boundaries boundaries, District of Maple Ridge Inventory Proximity to Buffer distance from urban interface TRIM Population Smoke Production Smoke production as a function of seral TRIM Potential stage Air Quality Smoke Venting Average elevation above valley floor of Potential forest inventory polygon TA I M G) Smoke Venting Smoke dispersion rating based on Ambient Air Analyst based on w Index long-term monthly averages, methods applied to the Greater Vancouver Regional District Visual Visual Quality Visually sensitive polygons District of Maple Ridge Quality inventory Interface Buffer distance from interface areas TRIM Urban Infrastructure Buffer distance from infrastructure District of Maple Ridge Interface ____________________________________ inventory ________________ Watersheds Watershed boundary District of Maple Ridge inventory Biodiversity High Value Biodiversity Areas containing ecologically sensitive District of Maple Ridge Areas areas or unique features inventory FORlester vl.O (Canadian Forest Service 2002); 2ESRI Spatial Analyst 8.1.2 (ESKI 2001); 3Fire 5ehaviour l'redictor 9'! (1emsott, 1997) I I I Ii I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 6 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System 4.2 Development of Probability Theme 4.2.1 Probability of Ignition Component I The probability of ignition component was divided into three subcomponents: fires caused by lightning, fires caused by human activity and ignition potential (Figure 5). The subcomponent rating scales and assigned initial weights are shown in Appendix 1. Lightning and Human Caused Fire The first two subcomponents, lightning and human caused fires were based on historical fire I frequency and cause in the study area from 1950 to 2004. Fire history records from the Ministry of Forest Protection Branch were translated into spatial points within the GIS framework. Five I hundred meter radius buffers were then created around every fire location point. This buffer distance was chosen because some older fire location data was only considered accurate to the nearest kilometre and represented fire ignition origin, and not fire perimeter. The number of I fire location points within these new buffer polygons was totalled. ESRI Spatial Analyst (2001) was then used to determine the final probability of ignition through the application of inverse distance weighted interpolation. The purpose of interpolation was to predict the value of cells I that lack actual points. The simplest form of inverse distance weighted interpolation is sometimes called "Shepard's method' (Shepard 1968). The equation used is as follows: I Wi Where: n is the number of scatter points in the set; fi are the prescribed function values at the scatter points (e.g., the data set values), and; wi are the weight functions assigned to each scatter I point. The classical form of the weight function is: iii wi = I I Where: p is an arbitrary positive real number called the power parameter (typically, p=2), and; hi is the distance from the scatter point to the interpolation point, or = F--Zf +(yyi)2 I Where: (x,y) are the coordinates of the interpolation point, and; (xi,yi) are the coordinates of each scatter point. I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 7 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management The weight function varies from a value of unity at the scatter point to a value-approaching zero as the distance from the scatter point increases. The weight functions are normalized so that the weights sum to unity. I The effect of the weight function was that the surface interpolated each scatter point and was influenced most strongly between scatter points by the points closest to the point being interpolated. Ignition Potential The third subcomponent, ignition potential, was an indicator of the potential for fire ignition based on fuel type and 90t11 percentile fire weather conditions (historic fire weather representing 90% of the most extreme conditions recorded). It was calculated using the Wildfire Ignition I Probability Predictor (WIPP), a tool from FORTester vl.0 (Lawson et al. 1993, Bernie Todd personal communication.). The model determined the probability of sustained ignition from simulated people-caused fire brands (matches and camp fires) and predicted, in broad classes I ("no-fire day" less than 50% probability of sustained ignition and "fire day" greater than 50% probability), from readily available indicators of fire danger based on benchmark fuel type groups applicable to British Columbia (Appendix 2). Ignition probabilities expressed on an area I basis provided a measure of people-caused fire potential from simple fire danger rating system components. I I I I I I I I I II B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 8 7/3/2007 Human Caused Fires Ignition Potential District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Component: Ignition N Kilometers 0 12525 5 RATING LIII LIf - LIII] LIII - - SCALE 0.0 1.0 2.0 3,0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Lightning Caused Fires / p---------- Ji J 1 Figure 5. Probability of Ignition component and associated subcomponents. 4.2.2 Fire Behaviour Component The fire behaviour component estimated how wildfire would behave under historic weather conditions that have occurred over the recorded climate record for the District. Information I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 9 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System was compiled that related stand-level fuel types, slope, aspect, and fire weather for the study I area. The resulting data was processed through the FBP97 (Fire Behaviour Predictor 97) program. Fire Behaviour Predictor 97 is a WindowsTM based version of the Canadian Fire Behaviour Prediction System (Forestry Canada 1992) developed by Remsoft Inc. The fire I behaviour outputs of FBP97 include: fire intensity; rate of spread; arid, crown fraction burned. These outputs form the subcomponents of the fire behaviour component (Figure 6). I The Canadian Fire Behaviour Prediction System uses 16 national benchmark fuel types to predict fire behaviour. For the WRMS, seven of the 16 fuel types were selected to estimate fire behaviour based on species composition and stand structure attributes. The provincial fuel type I database was adjusted to reflect changes in forest cover over the past eight years (since 1997) and to correct fuel-typing areas that did not match with fuel types verified by both field I checking and aerial photography review. Weather information was derived from historic records collected from weather stations I associated with the study area. Depending on the element measured, the period of record was 1931 to 2005. Data for temperature and precipitation was only continuous from 1950. A look up table, with computed fire weather indices summarized by station and Biogeoclimatic Unit, was I developed specifically for the District. This look-up table allows computation of fire percentiles for all possible permutations and combinations of fire weather indices for the period of record. I Fire weather data (temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, and wind speed) was used to calculate Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC) and Build-Up Index (BUT). Fire behaviour was subsequently modeled in FBP97 using upslope winds calculated from the relevant aspect. The I subcomponent rating scales and assigned initial weights are shown in Appendix 1. Fire Intensity I The fire intensity subcomponent was a measure of the rate of heat energy released per unit time per unit length of fire front. It was based on the rate of spread and predicted fuel consumption I of the fire, and was expressed in kilowatts per meter (Pyne 1984). Rate of Spread The rate of spread subcomponent was a measure of the speed at which fire expands its horizontal dimensions at the head of the fire. This was based on the hourly Initial Spread Index I (151) value and was expressed in meters per minute. The rate of spread was adjusted for steepness of slope and interactions between slope direction and wind direction determined from the Build-Up Index (BUI). I Crown Fraction Burned The crown fraction burned subcomponent was a measure of the proportion of the tree crowns I consumed by fire and was expressed as a percentage value. It was based on rate of spread, crown base height and foliar moisture content. I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 10 7/3/2007 I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 11 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Component: Fire Behaviour LT3 Rk- RA11NG SCALE 0.0 1.0 210 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.o 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Fire Intensity Rate of Spread Crn Fraction Burned Figure 6. Fire Behaviour component and associated suhcomponents for the 90% percentile July/August weather conditions applying a windspeed of 16 km/h District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Calculation of Spotting Distances Thecalculation of spotting distance for individual forest polygons was based on the predictive spotting models contained within BEHAVE (USDA Forest Fire Behaviour prediction software). Spotting models were originally devised to predict the maximum distance burning embers would travel over flat and regularly undulating terrain. The balance between particle size, burnout rate, and time or distance traveled determines maximum spotting distance (Figure 7). Smaller particles are lofted higher and transported further, but burnout sooner than larger particles. I Forest polygon size was an important consideration in determining the threshold of fuel necessary to create spotting. For the purpose of this analysis within the urban area, forest polygons (parks and greenways) less than 20 hectares in area were not included in the spotting I assessment. For forest polygons outside of the urban area, areas less than 20 hectares were not included in the assessment. The purpose of this analysis was to compute the maximum spotting distance over complex landscapes, for a given windspeed and fuel type, that particles I of different sizes would travel (Figure 7). The spotting distance across the interface assumed that wind direction was down slope and into the urban area. In general, it is believed that these models are conservative and underestimate the actual spotting distances under conditions of I running crown fire. I I I I I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 12 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Ember factors affect lofting height affects time 16km1h wind FACTORS AFFECTING SPOTTING IItrted By Fona Steele BA. Bokwe[l & Bsietee Ltd. Figure 7. Graphic that shows factors affecting spotting. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 13 7/3/2007 I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System I SPOTTING RISK (Windspeed 9km/h, All Directions) I I I I I I I Distnc ot Maple Ridge 0 2 U Figure 8. Map showing the polygon assignment of spotting distances based on fuel type, and fire behaviour potential for a 9-kmlh windspeed. 4.2.3 Suppression Response Capability Component I Ability to suppress wildfire was dependent on the speed of detection, terrain, accessibility and availability of resources. Five subcomponents were used to determine overall suppression response capability. These included constraints to detection, proximity to water sources, air I tanker arrival time, steepness of terrain, and proximity to roads (Figure 9). The subcomponent rating scales and assigned initial weights are shown in Appendix 1. Constraints to Detection In British Columbia, fires are detected by three primary methods that include a provincial lightninglocation system, aircraft, and/or by the public. Due to the unpredictability of flight frequency and public response, it was not possible to quantify the speed of detection. Detection is primarily a function of visibility limitations associated with high elevation cloud in specific parts of the study area. A storm front with varying amounts of precipitation can follow an active lightning period. This storm front creates cloud and fog within higher elevations zones of the study area during a 12 to 24 hour period following the storm. This cloud and fog cover B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 14 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System inhibits the critical detection period; since most fire ignitions within the study area occur during I the transition from a high to low-pressure weather system. The constraints to detection subcomponent were therefore based on elevation classes. The higher the elevation, the more likely detection will be constrained by cloud and fog cover. Elevation classes were assigned in I increments of 500 m and were measured from sea level. Elevations greater then 1000 m were given the highest rating. I Proximity to Water Sources Proximity to water sources was delineated using the hydrological base and only included I determinant (perennial) water sources. Proximity to water sources for fire suppression (an indicator of the ability to access water quickly for fire fighting) was evaluated by creating a 100 m and 300 m buffer around all determinant rivers, creeks and lakes. Areas outside of the 300 m I buffer were given the maximum subcomponent rating. Air Tanker Arrival Time The air tanker arrival time subcomponent was determined based on the distance from the closest air tanker base to the study area, the Abbotsford base. The ratings increased with I greater distance from the base. Terrain Steepness I Steepness of terrain influences the ability of a ground crew to build fireguards and carry out ground suppression. Average slope class was determined from the terrain data and ratings were assigned according to slope class. I Proximity to Roads I Proximity to roads was used to evaluate the accessibility of suppression resources reaching areas within a given landscape unit. It was evaluated based on a bush-walking rate of 1 km/h. Proximity to roads and helipads was rated by creating buffers around all roads in the study I area and assigning weights relative to walking time from these areas. Alpine tundra was included as area accessible by helicopter. I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 15 7/3/2007 I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Component: Suppression Capability /4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7/3/2007 - :J Rd RATING LIII LIII] LIII ILI SCALE 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.o 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Figure 9. Suppression response capability component and associated subcomponents. B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 16 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System 4.3 Development of Consequence Theme 4.3.1 Recreation Use Component Providing recreation opportunity is an important mandate of the District. Although the probability of lighthing caused forest fires within the study area is considered low, human caused fires present a substantial threat to the community. Overall, the consequence of fire impact on recreation use would be considerable. The recreation use consequence component was developed using information on one sub- component that encompassed important areas for recreation (Figure 10). The subcomponent rating scales and assigned initial weights are shown in Appendix 1. Parks BC Hydro reservoir parks (Stave Lake and Hayward Lake), GVRD parks (Kanaka Creek) and provincial parks (Rolley Lake, Golden Ears and Davis Lake) were given the maximum rating of 10. B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 17 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Component: Recreation Use M RATING liii LIII - Pill LIII LIII [111 - - SCALE 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Pnrks I Special Features Figure 10. Recreation Use component 4.3.2 Air Quality Component Wildfire within, and/or, adjacent to the District has the potential to substantially impact the air quality of the community. Wildfire caused smoke emissions could force a large-scale evacuation of the District lasting several days to a week. Smoke related air pollution is not a problem that can be confined to one location; it must be examined at a broader, landscape level. Because the forest landscape is in close proximity to the populated areas of the comml.mity, smoke and forest fire related emissions have the potential to notably impact regional air quality. The air B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 18 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System quality component of the WRMS system was developed considering a number of related factors including proximity to population, smoke production potential, and smoke venting potential (Figure 11). The WRMS system is considered useful for identification of potential air quality impacts of wildfires. However, given the complex topography of the area, actual air quality impacts from wildfires are difficult to accurately predict without detailed knowledge of airflow and other atmospheric parameters (i.e., stability and mixing height) in the region, particularly near the areas of smoke release and the surrounding airshed. The subcomponent rating scales and assigned initial weights are shown in Appendix 1. Proximity to Population The proximity to population subcomponent was based on distance to population centres (urban interface). The ratings in this subcomponent were assigned with the assumption that wildfire in close proximity to residential areas would have more potential to impact air quality (with smoke emissions, ash and embers) than wildfire occurring far from residential areas. Smoke Production Potential Smoke production is based on several factors including the moisture content of the fuel, the heat of combustion and, most importantly, the amount of fuel present on a given site. Available biomass (a function of structural stage) was used as a surrogate for smoke production potential. It was assumed that higher amounts of biomass (forest floor and dead and living vegetation) contributed to increased amounts of smoke production. Smoke production potential was greatest in old forest of the Coastal Western Hemlock (CWH) zone, followed by young forest, pole sapling, and finally, shrub herb. Old and mature forest in the Mountain Hemlock (MH) was treated separately than the CWH old forest because the amount of available biomass that contributes to flaming combustion is potentially lower in the MH zones compared to the CWH zone. Smoke Venting Potential The ability of the atmosphere to disperse and transport smoke is commonly estimated using the ventilation index (VI), which is forecast daily by Environment Canada. Smoke venting potential is an indicator of potential smoke dispersion based on mixing height during poor VI days. Within the District WRIVIS, the smoke venting potential was rated as a function of elevation; where higher elevations had a higher smoke venting potential than lower elevations. Typically, fires that are sufficiently upslope of the valley bottom have a greater likelihood of transporting the smoke plume above the mixed layer and or the valley re-circulations, thereby allowing smoke to be mixed to higher elevations without being transported down the valley into nearby communities. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 19 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Monthly Smoke Venting Index Onany given day any range of ventilation conditions can occur, however, there is some seasonality to the ventilation index that makes the occurrence of good to poor ventilation index days more likely depending on the time of year. This subcomponent was included in the air quality component to provide a relative monthly comparison of smoke venting potential. During the fire season, September and October have poor venting conditions compared to May and June when the venting index is generally good. For the hotter months of July and August, smoke venting potential is average compared to other times during the year. I I I I I I I I I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd.Page 20 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Component: Air Quality -------- .: MgII. RAtING L1 liii '. - - SCALE 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 ho 7.0 ho o.o too Prosimity to l'opulat.ion Centres I Smoke Production Potential t Smoke Venting ?otcntial I Monthly Smoke Venting Potential Figure 11. Air Quality component and associated subcomponents. 4.3.3 Visual Quality Component Visual quality within the District is considered fundamental to the maintenance and integrity of community aesthetics and values. Large-scale fire has the potential to blacken much of the B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 21 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System landscape, which would impair visual quality and therefore impact the aesthetic and recreational character of the District. The visual quality component provided a rating of the impact of a fire on visual quality from the vantage point of the District. It utilized the 1999 Visual Landscape Inventory done by Warren Fox. Areas rated most visually sensitive were assigned the maximum weighting of ten and areas not designated as visually sensitive were given a rating of zero (Figure 12). Component: Visual Quality Impact I I I I I I I I I I I I I L _J \Lpk RATING - - SCALE 0.0 110 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.o T'.O 8.0 .() 10.0 Figure 12. Visual Quality component. I 4.3.4 Urban Interface Component The Urban Interface component provided a rating of the potential for fire to pose a direct threat I to people and property located in and around the District. It contained three subcomponents: interface, infrastructure and watersheds (Figure 13). The subcomponent rating scales and assigned initial weights are shown in Appendix 1. I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 22 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System 1 Interface I The interface subcomponent was an indicator of threat to property and was based on structure density determined using TRIM. All anthological building features were extracted from this data set and buffered such that structural classes could be assigned based on their density on I the District control, including building materials (i.e., unrated roofing materials), defensible space around structures, access, water availability and vegetation within the proximity of I homes. Interface density classes were delineated as follows: I • Undeveloped 0-1 structures/km 2 • Isolated =1-10 structures/km2 • Mixed = 10-100 structures/km 2 I • Developed = 100-1000 structures/km 2 • Urban => 1000 structures/km 2 I The urban class was assigned a maximum rating, while area with no structures was assigned a rating of zero. I Infrastructure I The infrastructure subcomponent was an indicator of fire risk to key infrastructure within the District. The District established a list of key infrastructure which included: city hail, public works yard, fire stations, the hospital, RCMP detachment, federal prisons, BC Hydro dams I (Ruskin and Stave Lake), microwave repeater towers, BCTC transmission lines, BC Government fish hatchery facility, BC Hydro Lodge, Mission Rod and Gun Club, and the Zajak Foundation Camp. All point locations were buffered by 500m and given maximum ratings. I Watersheds The watershed component was developed as an indicator of the risk to water supply and water quality. The District's water supply is serviced by surface water from three community watersheds within the District. Given the importance of water quality to the community, the watersheds were given maximum ratings. I I r- I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 23 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Component: Urban Interface - • Maple Ridge RATING J] ]====== SCALE 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Interface Key Infrastructure I Watersheds Figure 13. Urban Interface component and associated subcomponents. B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 24 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System 4.3.5 Biodiversity Component The biodiversity component was developed using one subcomponent: high value biodiversity areas from data provided by the District of Maple Ridge. The subcomponent rating scales and assigned initial weights are shown in Appendix 1. High Value Biodiversity Areas The District encompasses ecologically sensitive areas including grasslands and riparian areas. In addition, unique habitat features have been identified in various locations within the District. Component: Biodiversity _J hpI 1d RATING SCALE 0.0 10 2.0 .0 .1.0 3.0 0.0 .0 HI) 0.0 10.0 Figure 14. Biodiversity component. B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 25 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System 5.0 Results 5.1 Overview A schematic compilation of mapping outputs from the initial implementation of the District Wildfire Risk Management System is presented in Figure 15. The mapping outputs parallel the description of the model in the previous section. In other words: • Subcomponents maps are generated using 0-10 rating scales derived from existing GIS databases and/or sub-model outputs; • Component maps are generated using user-defined weights on each subcomponent (see Appendix 1); and, • Final probability and consequence rating maps are generated using user- defined weights on each component (Figure 15). A final probability/consequence overlay map is generated by overlaying the final rating maps (Figure 16). SUBCOMPONENTS 11 COMPONENTS - FINALRATINGS FINALOVERLAY - Igntrofl PoonIii Fire Behvrorrr - Lrghlninq Crred Fires Supprororr Cepebrlrty - - Hrrreen Crreod Frro Probbrhty oI Igrritioo ik- I - H FINAL PROBABILITY RATING PROBABILITY CONSEQUENCE - WrrtoeIrede RereeIrorr Use Inlrastriroture Ar Oruaby Intererure Vrr.rI Qrrahty BrudieeAity Urbarr Interface r - 'I FINAL CONSEQUENCE X PROBABILITY OVERLAY FINAL CONSEQUENCE RATING Figure 15. Summary mapping outputs from the District Wildfire Risk Management System. B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 26 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System PROBABILITY X CONSEQUENCE Final Overlay Probability X Consequence Low - Low Low - Moderate Low - High [ ' Low- Extreme / Mod: rat: de rate Moderate - High Moderate - Extreme J1 c High - Low High - Moderate _/__ 4 1 -41 High High 113, if / - 1 - •/_f ( I / - ) K :::J Maple Ridge Figure 16. Final overlay of probability and consequence. As shown in Figure 15 and all of the maps in Section 4, each component and subcomponent map applies a similar white-green-yellow-orange-red colour scheme depicting ratings on 0 - 10 scales. An expanded colour scheme was used to show all probability/consequence combinations for the final interpretation. In this manner the final probability/consequence overlay map in Figure 16 reflects the full range of risk spatially, within and adjacent to the District, from 'low probability- high consequence' areas through to 'high probability-low consequence' areas for extreme fire conditions. I These final mapping outputs are the result of multiple interactive workshops, during which the project team evaluated the accuracy and consistency of each subcomponent and component. The weights used to generate these outputs at the component level are shown in Figure 17. I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 27 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System In overview, the area of highest consequence is located within and adjacent to the interface I areas of the District. This was expected given the identified values at risk. In terms of wildfire probability, there is a relatively large area of moderate to high fire probability in the lower elevations where the District and the UBC Research Forest are located. This probability declines I with increasing elevation out of the valley bottom. These probability ratings are driven largely by human ignitions and the fire behaviour potential of young forest stands established by historic logging. The probabilities of ignition and fire behaviour are offset by good suppression capability afforded by roads, water sources and the gentle terrain associated with the valley bottom. I Probability Component (PC) Weight (W) Consequence Component (CC) Weight (W) Scale Scale Urban Interface 0 - 10 50% I Ignition 0 - 10 30% Visual Quality 0 - 10 10% Fire Behaviour 0 - 10 30% Air Quality 0 - 10 20% Suppression 0 - 10 40% Recreation Use 0 - 10 10% Biodversity 0 - 10 10% 100% 100% I Figure 17. Initialized weights on all components. Overall, the community has a moderate to high probability of fire within and adjacent to the I community and the consequence of fire within District limits is moderate to high given that resource values included in the analysis. 5.2 Data Quality Issues The data provided by the forest cover inventory was fundamental to the development of many of the anderlying spatial GIS databases. The forest cover inventory databases (MOF) included substantial validation efforts and therefore we are confident in the overall accuracy of this data. However, one concern directly related to the fire management data used, as part of this project was fuel typing. Since these data sources are fundamental to the development of the fire behaviour themes, we expand on these concerns below. 5.2.1 Fuel Typing As part of the provincial fuel type classification program, the Ministry of Forests Protection Branch completed fuel typing of the provincial forest land adjacent to the District of Maple Ridge (Hawkes et. al. 1995). This classification applies the Canadian Fire Behaviour Prediction (FBP) System fuel type classification using a detailed algorithm that relates specific attributes of standard forest cover inventory data to specific fuel types within the FBP classification scheme (Taylor et. al. 1997). For most of the fuel types present in the study area there is was a good fit with FBP types. For example, we used C4 for pole sapling forests and C3 for young forest, which have worked well. I I I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 28 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System The qualitative attributes of these FBP fuel types are similar and representative of the structural attributes present within these forest types of the adjacent landscape However for other fuel types, the relationship is considered to be poor. In particular, the old forests of the District, which represent a significant portion of the total area, do not correspond well with any of the FBP types. In discussion with CFS and the Ministry of Forests Protection Branch fire behaviour specialists, it was determined that C5 should be substituted for M2 in an attempt to alter these fire behaviour outputs to levels considered more realistic for both the weather and fuel conditions present within the District. The substitution of C5 for M2 resulted in an improved result, particularly for the old forest types in the CWHvm2 and MHmml. However, it was felt that for CWHvm1 and CWHdm old forests the fire behaviour prediction might now under-predict the overall fire behaviour potential. Figure 19 below provides a comparison of MOF fuel typing and updated fuel types for the study area. I I I I I I L I I I I I I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 29 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System N Legend Stndy Ama Cmstnof of Mae Rrdgo - Lakes ar,d Avers MOF FeSi Type — - Non-EorestTA Data - ;- - - - •1 C-2 J ----- '7-i vj I C-7 ?F&;/ 0-rb L 'V SIAN r \O > Ø / 02 4 8 Legend N S1m.rty Area tashot of Mae A/ge 51— - LakesandRters UpdfedFlType c-a fgvrm-ForeotNo Data 0-3 _ •_i -f-:- - 0-tb — a L — -.- \ -- B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 30 7/3/2007 0 2 4 8 K IC n-n to rs Figure 18. Comparison of original MOF fuel typing (top) and updated fuel typing (bottom) for the District. District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System 6.0 Applications in the Fire Management Plan for the District of Maple Ridge The development of the District of Maple Ridge WRMS has benefited from the collaborative approach of the District. This translated to a willingness to learn and explore the fire risk elements that could impact the District. The process will allow interested parties to understand the various phases of model development and will create an education to tool for public education and overall fire management planning. The model provides useful outputs to assist in developing strategic fire management strategies. The District WRMS provides a comprehensive assessment of the wildfire risk within and adjacent to the community. The assessment can be used to further develop strategic fire management zones for the fire management program as described within the Fire Management Plan. I Fire protection resources can undergo a detailed evaluation of suppression response capability. The level of risk, as identified by the WRMS, can prioritize efficient use of these resources. By improving the fire suppression capability, the risk of wildfire can be reduced. This may require the acquisition of more resources (water delivery systems) or modification of existing practices (helicopter contract response times). The current WRMS has utilized the most appropriate fuel types from the Canadian Fire Behaviour Prediction System for District lands. Modified stands from fuel hazard treatments I (wildiand/urban interface) or other disturbance such as insects (mountain pine beetle) produce a unique fuel type in the short-term. The development of new model algorithms is required to properly assess how fire behaviour and ignition potential in these stands would change in the I future. A change in fire behaviour and ignition potential may reflect a higher or lower risk of wildfire. 7.0 Acknowledgements We acknowledge the active participation of Peter Grootendorst (Fire Chief) and David Cooke (GIS Department) from the District of Maple Ridge. Judi Beck, BC Ministry of Forests Protection Branch provided provincial fuel typing algorithms. Amelia Needoba of B.A. Blackwell and Associates Ltd. implemented the system. Claire Tweedsdale of Forest Ecosystem Solution Ltd. did the GIS programming for spotting. 8.0 References Blackwell, B.A. and D.W. Ohlson. 2004. GVRD Watershed Wildfire Risk Management System. Contract Report to the Greater Vancouver Regional District. 9 pages. Blackwell, B.A., Gray, R.W., Steele, F.M., Needoba, A.J., Green, R.N., and K. MacKenzie. 2003. A wildfire threat rating system for the Birkenhead and Gates Landscape Units, British B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 31 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Columbia. in: R.T. Engstrom and W.J. de Groot (eds.) Proceedings of the 22nd Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference: Fire in Temperate, Boreal, and Montane Ecosystems. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL. Canadian Standards Association, 1997. Risk Management: Guideline for Decision-Makers: A National Standard of Canada. CAN/CSA-Q850-97. Etobicoke, Canada. Council of Standards Australia / Council of Standards New Zealand, 1999. Risk Management. AZ/NZS 4360:1999. Strathfield, Australia. Hawkes, B. and Beck, J. 1997. A wildfire threat rating system. 1997. Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC. Technology Transfer Note 01. International Standards Organization, 2002. Risk Management Vocabulary, Guidelines for use in Standards. First Edition. ISO/IEC Guide 73:2002(E/F). Geneva, Switzerland. Hawkes, Brad C., David Almost Goodenough, Bruce Lawson, Alan Thomson, Olaf Niemann, Peter Fuglem, Judi Beck, Bryan Bell, and Phil Symington. 'Forest Fire Fuel Type Mapping Using GIS and Remote Sensing in British Columbia." GIS 95 Conference Proceedings. Fort Collins: GIS World, Inc., 1995. 2:647-656. Lawson, B.D., O.B. Armitage, and G.N. Dairymple. 1993. Ignition probabilities for simulated people-caused fires in British Columbia's lodgepole pine and white spruce-subalpine fir forests. Paper presented at the 12 International Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology, Oct. 26-29, 1993, Jekyll Island, Georgia. Muller, C. 1993. Wildfire threat analysis: A decision support system for improved firemanagement. Paper presented at "The Burning Question: Fire Management in NSW" Coffs Harbour, Aug. 1993, UNE, Armidale, NSW, Australia. Taylor, S. R.G. Pike, and M.E. Alexander. 1997. Field guide to the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior U Prediction (FPB) System. Special Report 11. Fire Management Network. Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Center. 60 p. I Vodopier, J.; Haswell, D. 1995. The application of wildfire threat analysis in forests of southwestern Australia. In: BUSHFIRE '95, Australian Bushfire Conference, Sept. 27-30, 1995, Hobart, Tasmania (no pagination in proceedings). I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 32 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System 9.0 Appendix 1: WRMS model subcomponent rating scales and weights 9.1 Probability Component Tables Wildfire Risk Management Component: Ignition The Ignition component provides a rating of the probability of wildfire occurring in a given location based on historical fire frequency. The rating is calculated as a weighted sum rating using two attributes: Lightning Caused Fires, and Human Caused Fires. Component Attributes: Attribute Indicator / Units Rating Scale Weight Lightning Caused Fires Indicator of historical frequency of lightning caused fires # of fires/500m buffer >4 10 3 -4 7 0 1 - 2 3 0 Human Caused Fires Indicator of historical frequency of human caused fires # of firesl500m buffer >4 10 30% 3 -4 7 0 1 - 2 3 0 Ignition Potential Indicator of the potential for fire ignition based on fuel type and weather, calculated using WIPP (Wildfire Ignition Probability Predictor) Probability Class Extreme 10 40% Very High 8 2 High 6 Moderate 4 Low I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 33 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Wildfire Risk Management Component: Fire Behaviour The Fire Behaviour component provides a rating of the probability of a wildfire exhibiting extreme behaviour in a given location given existing fuel types and 90th percentile weather conditions. The rating is calculated as a weighted sum rating using three attributes that are output from the FBP system: Fire Intensity, Rate of Spread, and Crown Fraction Burned. Component Attributes: Attribute Indicator I Units Rating Scale Weight Fire Intensity Indicator of the rate of heat energy released. kilowatts per metre > 10,000 10 I 45% 4,001 - 10,000 8 0 2,001 -4,000 6 501 - 2,000 4 10-500 2 0-9 Rate of Spread Indicator of speed at which fire extends horizontally. metres per minute > 20 10 45% 16-20 7 0 11 - 15 5 6-10 3 0-5 Crown Fraction Burned Indicator of the proportion of tree crowns consumed by fire (i.e., a measure of tree mortality). % 50- 100 10 10% 40 - 50 8 0 20 - 39 6 10-19 4 1-9 2 0 B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 34 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Wildfire Risk Management Component: Suppression Response Capability The Suppression component provides a rating of the probability that a wildfire could be quickly exterminated in a given location given existing resources. The rating is calculated as a weighted sum rating using five attributes: Contraints to Detection, Proximity to Water Sources, Helicopter Attack Time, Terrain Steepness, and Proximity to Roads and Helioads. Component Attributes: Attribute Indicator! Units Rating Scale Weight Constraints to Detection Indicator of the ability to detect a fire: reconnaissance at higher elevations is often constrained by cloud cover, elevation metres > 1000 [ 10 10% 501 - 1000 7 0 - 500 2 Proximity to Water Sources Indicator of the ability to access water quickly for fire fighting. Based on distance from al/season streams and lakes. distance metres >300 10 10% 101-300 7 0-100 2 Air Tanker Arrival Time Indicator of time for air tanker action measured as flight time (concentric) from Abbotsford (300k1hr) minutes > 40 10 30% 31 -40 (200km) 7 0 21 - 30 (150km) 5 11-20(100km) 3 0-10(50km) Terrain Steepness Indicator of the difficulty of control/contain on the landscape. slope Class % > 60 10 40% 41 -60 7 0 21 - 40 3 0-20 Proximity to Roads and Helipads Indicator of the ability to get suppression resources into an area: based on a bush walking rate of 1 km/hour. minutes > 120 (>2km) 10 61 - 120 (2 km) 7 0 31 - 60 (1km) 5 16-30 (500m) 3 0-15 (250m) B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 35 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System 9.2 Consequence Component Tables Wildfire Risk Management Component: Urban Interface The property component provides a rating of the potential for a fire to pose a direct threat to people and property. The impact is calculated as a weighted sum rating using three attributes; Interface Density, Key Infrastructure and Watersheds Component Attributes: Attribute Indicator I Units Rating Scale Weight Interface Indicator of threat to private and public property. Density class (from TRIM) = Build-up areas and # of structures/km2 Weight by density class Urban 10 50% Developed 9 0 Mixed 7 Isolated 5 Undeveloped 2 None Key Infrastructure Indicator of the threat to critical community infrastructure: buffer 500m Community High 10 30% 0 Importance Watershed I Community High 10 20% Watershed Wildfire Risk Management Component: Visual Quality Impact The Visual Quality Impact component provides a rating of the impact that a fire would have on visual quality from both regional and local vantage points. The impact is calculated based on ratings of Existing Visual Quality. Component Attributes: Attribute Indicator / Units Rating Scale Weight Existing Visual Quality Indicator of the visual quality rating for Visual local vantage points. Sensitivity Units as delineated from important Visually Sensitive 10 Visually Sensitive Polygons n B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 36 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Wildfire Risk Management Component: Air Quality Impact The Air Quality Impact component provides a rating of the impact that a fire would have on regional air quality within the Maple Ridge airshed. The impact is calculated as a weighted sum rating using four attributes: Proximity to Population Centres, Smoke Production Potential, Smoke Venting Potential and Monthly Smoke Venting Potential. Component Attributes: Attribute Indicator I Units Rating Scale Weight I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Proximity to Population Centres Indicator of the distance to populated areas. distance (D) kilometres D <500 m 10 30% 1 km> D> 500 m 9 0 2 km>D>lkm 7 5km>D>2km 5 10km>D>5km 3 25km>D>10 km 1 D>25km Smoke Production Potential Indicator of the potential for smoke production as a function of seral stage (overall biomass, forest floor depth, etc.) N/A Old & Mature 10 T 20% Young 7 QJ Old & Mature MH 5 Pole Sapling 3 Shrub / Herb Smoke Venting Potential Indicator of the potential for smoke dispersion based on the mixing height during poor ventilation indexdavs by elevation (E) metres height < lOOm 10 30% SOOm> H > 1 OOm 7 1 I 000m> H > 500m 4 H>l000m Monthly Smoke Venting Potential Indicator of the potential for smoke dispersion based on month by month Jan 10 20% Nov, Dec 9 1 Feb 8 Sept, Oct 7 Aug 6 Mar 4 May 3 Jun, July 2 Apr B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 37 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Wildfire Risk Management Component: Recreation Use The Recreation component provides a rating of the potential for a fire to pose a direct threat to people and property in and around the District of Mission and or impact special features within the community. The impact is calculated as a weighted sum rating using two attributes: Parks and Special Features. Component Attributes: Attribute Indicator I Units Rating Scale Weight Parks Indicator of the threat to recreation use areas Park boundary Municipal 10 50% Provinical 5 Special Features Special features identified within the study area and rated as eKtreme, high. moderate, or low Buffer lOOm around Buffer T 10 50% feature Wildfire Risk Management Component: B i od iversity The biodiversity component provides a rating of the potential for a fire to pose a direct threat to valued ecosystem resources in the District. The impact is calculated as a weighted sum rating using High Value Biodiversity Areas. Component Attributes: Attribute Indicator I Units Rating Scale High Value Biodiversity Areas I Unique Featurese SARA 10 100% Ecologically Sens:tive Areas Moderate 10 Ecologically Sensitive Areas Low 5 I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 38 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System 10.0 Appendix 2: The Wildfire Ignition Probability Prediction System (WIPPs) I (1) Format of the Standard WIPP Equation is: P = 1/ { I + exp[ BO + B I *FFMC + B2*DMC + B3*DC + B4*BUI + B5*FWI + B6*ISI I I (2) Standard Association of FBP Fuel Types and WIPP Equations: Table 1 provides the suggested standard association of WIPP equation to FBP Fuel types. Possible Association of WIPP Equations to FBP Fuel Types The option exists to change the choice of the WIPP equation, which is used for each FBP fuel type. The default option, which is the first equation listed, and the subsequent possible options are listed in Table 2. These possible associations are from Lawson and Arinitage (1997) Relationship of WIPP Equations to General Fuel Type and Provincial Experimental Sites Table 3 details the general fuel types and provincial test sites that were used to create the individual WIPP equations. References Lawson, B.D., O.B. Armitage, and G.N. Dalrymple. 1994a. Ignition probabilities for simulated people-caused fires in B.C.'s lodgepole pine and white spruce-alpine fir forests. Pages 493-505 in Proc.12th1 Conf. On Fire & Forest Meteorology. Oct 26-28, 1993. Jekyll Is. GA., Soc. Am. Foresters. Bethesda, MD. Lawson, B.D., O.B. Armitage. 1997. Ignition Probability Equations for some Canadian Fuel Types. Report submitted to the Canadian Committee on Forest Fire Management. (Draft report). I I I I I I I I I H I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 39 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Table 1: Standard Association of FBP Fuel Types and WIPP Equations FBP Fuel WIPP Eqn WIPP Equation Cl 1A P = 1/( l+EXP( 5.061 - 0 .086*FFMC)) 02 9C P = 1/( 1+EXP( 33.299 - 0 .353*FFMC - 0.057*DMC)) C3 6A P = 1/( 1+EXP( 2.199 - 0 .021*DMC - 0 .265*ISI)) C4 6-5012 P = 1!( 1+EXP( 3.731 - 0 .079*DMC - 0 .185*ISI)) C5 9BC P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.766 - 0 .005*DC 0 .396*ISI)) C6 BC Dry Pine P = 1/( 1+EXP( 2.107 - 0 .727*ISI)) C7 4BC P = lI( 1+EXP( 1.563 - 0 .005*BUI - 0 .478*ISI)) Dl BC P = 1I( 1+EXP( 12.781 - 0.121*FFMC - 0.032*DMC)) D2 8 P = 1I( 1+EXP( 14.0- 0.121*FFMC - 0 .010*DMC)) Mi 7A P = 1/( 1+EXP( 25.540 - 0 .264*FFMC - 0 .036*DMC)) M2 9BC P 1/( 1+EXP( 2.766 - 0 .005*DC 0 .396*ISI)) M3 9A P = 1/( 1+EXP( 2.144 - 0 .423*ISI)) M4 9BC P = 1/( 1+EXP( 2.766 - 0 .005*DC 0 .396*ISI)) Si 2A P = 1/( 1+EXP( 7.219 - 0.107*FFMC)) S2 2A P = 1/( i+EXP( 7.219 - 0 .107*FFMC)) S3 2A P = 1/( 1+EXP( 7.219 - 0.107*FFMC)) Ola SaA P = 1/( i+EXP( 0.161 - 0 .016*DMC 0 .240*ISl)) Oib SaA P = i/( i+EXP( 0.161 -0.01 6*DMC 0 .240*ISI)) I I H I I I H F-I I I I I I I I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 40 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Table 2: Possible Association of WIPP Equations to FBP Fuel Types FBP Fuel WIPP Eqn WIPP Equation Cl 1A P = i/ ( 1+EXP( 5.061 - 0.086*FFMC )) Cl lB P = 1/ ( l+EXP( 1.965 - 0.704*ISI )) Cl 10 P = 1/ ( 1+EXP( 0.837 - 1.020*ISI C2 9C P = i/( 1+ExP( 33.299 - 0.353*FFMC - 0.057*DMC )) 02 9A P = 1/( 1+EXP( 2.144 - 0.423*1ST )) 02 913 P = i/( 1+EXP( 10.675 - 0.112*FFMC - 0.100*DMC )) 02 9D P = i/( 1+EXP( 11.677 - 0.123*FFMC - 0.027*DMC )) 02 9E P = i/( 1+EXP( 6.438 - 0.077*DMC - 0.357*ISI )) 02 913C P = i/( 1+ExP( 2.766 - 0.005*DC - 0.396*151 )) 03 6A P = 1/( 1+EXP( 2.199 - 0.021*DMC - 0.265*1ST )) 03 6-5012 P = i/( 1+EXP( 3.731 - 0.079*DMC - 0.185*1ST )) C3 6-6017 P= i/( 1+ExP( 1.754 - 0.021*DMC - 0.282*151 )) C3 6B P = i/( 1+ExP( 14.424 - 0.171*FFMC - 0.017*DMC )) C3 BCDryPine P = 1/( 1+EXP( 2.107 - 0.727*151 )) 03 BCMoistPine P = 1/( 1+EXP( 2.146 - 0.009*BUI _0.349*TST )) 04 6-5012 P = i/( 1+EXP( 3.731 - 0.079*DMC - 0.185 ISI )) 04 6A P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.199 - 0.021*DMC - 0.265*ISI )) 04 6-7015 P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.199 - 0.022*DMC - 0.119*151 )) 04 613 P = i/( 1+EXP( 14.424 - 0.171*FFMC - 0.017*DMC )) 04 BCDryPine P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.107 - 0.727*ISI )) C4 BC Moist Pine P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.146 - 0.009*BUI _0.349*ISI )) 05 913C P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.766 - 0.005*DC _0.396*IST )) 05 6A P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.199 - 0.021*DMC - 0.265*ISI )) CS 9A P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.144 - 0.423*151 )) 05 9E P= i/( 1+ExP( 6.438 - 0.077*DMC - 0.357*151 )) 06 BCDryPine P = i/( 1+ExP( 2.107 - 0.727*ISI )) 06 913C P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.766 - 0.005*DC _0.396*ISI )) 06 6A P = i/( 1+ExP( 2.199 - 0.021*DMC - 0.265*151 )) 06 6-5012 P = 1/( 1+EXP( 3.731 - 0.079*DMC - 0.185*151 )) 06 90 P = i/( 1+ExP( 33.299 - 0.353*FFMC - 0.057*DMC )) 06 9D P = i/K 1+EXP( 11.677 - 0.123*FFMC - 0.027*DMC )) 07 413C P = i/( 1+ExP( 1.563 - 0.005*BTJI - 0.478*151 )) Dl 80 P = i/( 1+ExP( 12.781 - 0.121*FFMC - 0.032*DMC )) Dl 8A P = i/( 1+EXP( 3.503 - 0.044*DNC - 0.407*151 )) B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 41 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System FBP Fuel WIPP Eqn WIPP Equation Dl 813 P = i/( 1+EXP( 5.026 - 0.233*ISI )) D2 8 P = i/( 1+EXP( 14.0 - 0.121*FFMC - 0.010*DMC )) Ml 7A P = i/( 1+EXP( 25.540 - 0.264*FFMC - 0.036*DMC )) Ml 713 P = i/( 1+EXP( 45.827 0.491*FFNC )) M2 913C P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.766 - 0.005*DC _0.396*ISI )) M2 9A P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.144 - 0.423*ISI )) M2 913 P = i/( 1+ExP( 10.675 - 0.112*FFMC - 0.100*DMC )) M2 90 P = i/( 1+EXP( 33.299 - 0.353*FFMC - 0.057*DMC )) M2 9D P = i/( 1+EXP( 11.677 - 0.123*FFMC - 0.027*DMC )) M2 9E P = i/( 1+EXP( 6.438 - 0.077*DMC - 0.357*ISI )) M3 9A P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.144 - 0.423*ISI )) M3 913 P = i/( 1+EXP( 10.675 - 0.112*FFMC - 0.100*DMC )) M3 90 P = i/( 1+EXP( 33.299 - 0.353*FFMC - 0.057*DMC )) M3 9D P = i/( 1+ExP( 11.677 - 0.123*FFMC - 0.027*DMC )) M3 9E P = i/( 1+EXP( 6.438 - 0.077*DMC - 0.357*ISI )) M3 913C P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.766 - 0.005*DC _0.396*ISI )) M4 913C P = i/( 1+EXP( 2.766 - 0.005*DC _0.396*ISI )) M4 9A P = i/( 1+ExP( 2.144 - 0.423*181 )) M4 913 P = 1/( 1+EXP( 10.675 - 0.112*FFMC - 0.100*DMC )) M4 90 P = i/( 1+EXP( 33.299 - 0.353*FFMC - 0.057*DMC )) M4 9D P = i/( 1+EXP( 11.677 - 0.123*FFMC - 0.027*DMC )) M4 9E P = 1/( 1+EXP( 6.438 - 0.077*DMC - 0.357*ISI )) Si 2A P = i/( 1+EXP( 7.219 - 0.107*FFNC )) S2 2A P = i/( 1+ExP( 7.219 - 0.107*FFMC )) S3 2A P = i/( 1+EXP( 7.219 - 0.107*FFMC )) Ola SaA P = i/( 1+EXP( 0.161 - 0.016*DMC _0.240*ISI)) Ola SbA p = i/( 1+ExP( 46.942 - 0.508*FFMC _0.063*DMC)) Olb SaA P = i/( 1+EXP( 0.161 - 0.016*DMC _0.240*ISI)) Olb SbA P = i/( 1+EXP( 46.942 - 0.508*FFMC _0.063*DMC) I I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 42 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System Table 3: Relationship of WIPP Equations to General Fuel Type and Provincial Experimental Sites FBP Fuel WIPP Eqn General Fuel Type(s) Provincial Site(s) Cl 1A Cladonia NF (101-5), MB (501-6) Cl lB Pine-Cladonia, Spruce-Cladonia AB-Whitecourt (702-2,702-8) Cl 10 Cladonia SK (601-6) C2 9C Spruce NWT (901-3) C2 9A Spruce-Fir NF (101-3) C2 9B Spruce NF (101-4) C2 9D Pine-Spruce,Spruce,Spruce- Pine MB (501 -1 ),SK (601-4), AB-Kananaskis (701-9) 02 9E Spruce, Spruce AB-Whitecourt (702-6, 702-7) C2 9BC White Spruce-Subalpine Fir BC-Prince George C3 6A Closed Jack Pine/Lodgepole Pine, Pine-Spruce, Balsam Fir NF (101-1), SK (601-7, 601-8), MB (501-2, 501-5, 501-9), AB-Kananaskis (701-5, 701-6), AB-Whitecourt (702-3) NWT_(901-2) C3 6-5012 Jack Pine (JY2) MB (501-2) 03 6-6017 Pine SK (601-7) 03 6B Pine, Jack Pine AB-Whitecourt (702-1), NWT_(901-1) 03 BC Dry Pine Lodgepole Pine ( Dry) BC-Prince George 03 BC Moist Pine Lodgepole Pine ( Moist) BC-Prince George 04 6-5012 Jack Pine (JY2) MB (501-2) 04 6A See 03 - 6A above 04 6-7015 Lodgepole Pine (L4) AB-Kananaskis (701-5) 04 6B Pine, Jack Pine AB-Whitecourt (702-1), NWT(901-1) 04 BC Dry Pine Lodgepole Pine ( Dry) BC-Prince George 04 BC Moist Pine Lodgepole Pine ( Moist) BC-Prince George 05 9BC White Spruce-Subalpine Fir BC-Prince George 05 6A See 03 - 6A above 05 9A Spruce-Fir NF (101-3) 05 9E Spruce, Spruce AB-Whitecourt (702-6, 702-7) 06 BC Dry Pine Lodgepole Pine ( Dry) BC-Prince George 06 9BC White Spruce-Subalpine Fir BC-Prince George C6 6A See 03 - 6A above 06 6-5012 Jack Pine (JY2) MB (501-2) B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 43 7/3/2007 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System FBP Fuel WIPP Eqn General Fuel Type(s) Provincial Site(s) C6 9C Spruce NWT (901-3) 06 9D Pine-Spruce,Spruce,Spruce- Pine MB (501 -l),SK (601-4), AB-Kananaskis (701 -9) C7 413C Interior Douglas Fir ( open wig rass) BC Dl 8C Poplar-Birch, Poplar, Aspen MB (501-4,501-8), NWT (901-6) Dl 8A Pine-Poplar, Aspen AB-Whitecourt (702-4, 702-5) Dl 8B Aspen SK (601-1) 02 8 See Note Ml 7A Spruce-Aspen-Pine NWT (901-5) Ml 7B Poplar-Spruce-Pine NWT (901-4) M2 9BC White Spruce-Subalpine Fir BC-Prince George M2 9A Spruce-Fir NF (101-3) M2 9B Spruce NF (101-4) M2 90 Spruce NWT (901-3) M2 90 Pine-Spruce,Spruce,Spruce- Pine MB (501 -1 ),SK (601-4), AB-Kananaskis (701-9) M2 9E Spruce, Spruce AB-Whitecourt (702-6, 702-7) M3 9A Spruce-Fir NF (101-3) M3 9B Spruce NF (101-4) M3 90 Spruce NWT (901-3) M3 90 Pine-Spruce,Spruce,Spruce- Pine MB (501 -1 ),SK (601-4), AB-Kananaskis (701-9) M3 9E Spruce, Spruce AB-Whitecourt (702-6, 702-7) M3 913C White Spruce-Subalpine Fir BC-Prince George M4 913C White Spruce-Subalpine Fir BC-Prince George M4 9A Spruce-Fir NF (101-3) M4 9B Spruce NF (101-4) M4 90 Spruce NWT (901 -3) M4 90 Pine-Spruce,Spruce,Spruce- Pine MB (501 -1 ),SK (601-4), AB-Kananaskis (701-9) M4 9E Spruce, Spruce AB-Whitecourt (702-6, 702-7) 51 2A Cutover-Bracken, Fir regen-open BC-L Cowichan (802-2, 802-3) S2 2A Cutover-Bracken, Fir regen-open BC-L Cowichan (802-2, 802-3) S3 2A Cutover-Bracken, Fir regen-open BC-L Cowichan (802-2, 802-3) B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 44 7/3/2007 District of Maple Ridge Wildfire Risk Management System FBP Fuel WIPP Eqn General Fuel Type(s) Provincial Site(s) Ola SaA Grass, Fir-grass-open BC-i 00 Mile (801-3, 801-8) Ola SbA Grass AB-Whitecourt ( 702-10) Olb SaA Grass, Fir-grass-open BC-i 00 Mile (801-3, 801-8) 01 b SbA Grass AB-Whitecourt ( 702-10) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LII I B.A. Blackwell & Associates Ltd. Page 45 7/3/2007