The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007-10-01 - Committee of the Whole - Agenda and Reports.pdfI District of Maple Ridge COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA October 1, 2007 1:00 P.M. Council Chamber Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review and debate of issues. No voting takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more information or clarification. Note: If required, there will be a 15-minute break at 3:00 p.m. Chair: Acting Mayor DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Note: Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications may be permitted to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes. Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda: 1101 RZ/095/06, 12636 228 Street, RS-3 to RS-lb Staff report dated September 4, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6511-2007 to permit a 5 lot subdivision be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Committee of the Whole Agenda October 1, 2007 Page 2 of 5 1102 RZ/103/05, 23004 Dewdney Trunk Road, First Extension Staff report recommending that a one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/103/05. 1103 DP/065/07, 11282 Cottonwood Drive Staff report dated September 19, 2007 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/065/07 in support of a 71 unit phased townhouse development including relocation of 2 units to different buildings on site. 1104 DP/DVP/090/06, 23267 Silver Valley Road, 13750 232 Street Staff report dated September 13, 2007 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/090/06 to vary front yard setbacks in the RM-1 zone and further that, the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/090/06 in support of a 31 unit townhouse development 1105 VP/071/07, 23267 Silver Valley Road and 13750 232 Street Staff report dated September 5, 2007 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign VP/071/07 to vary the requirement to convert to underground wiring fronting the proposed RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone. 1106 VP/078/06, 24901 108 Avenue Staff report dated September 5, 2007 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign VP/078/06 to vary the minimum standard width requirement for the new local urban road. 1107 VP/075/05, Lots 1 - 51, District Lot 263, Plan BCP 30587 Staff report dated September 10, 2007 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign VP/075/05 to vary maximum building height. 1108 VP/094/06, 22990 Lougheed Highway, Roll #5256900006 (Lougheed Highway) Staff report dated September 17, 2007 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign VP/094/06 to vary setback for the townhouse development and to vary rear yard setbacks for the single family lot development. Committee of the Whole Agenda October 1, 2007 Page 3 of 5 1109 VP/029/05, 23701 Kanaka Way Staff report dated September 18, 2007 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign VP/029/05 to vary off-site servicing requirements for an unopened, unconstructed portion of 112th Avenue. 1110 VP/087/06, 10706, 10754 248 Street Staff report dated September 19, 2007 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign VP/087/06 to vary a rear yard setback for 12 of the single family lots and to waive the requirement for the conversion of overhead wiring to underground wiring on 248 Street. 1111 VP/075/07, 10316, 10346 240 Street Staff report dated September 20, 2007 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign VP/075/07 to waive the requirement for the conversion of overhead utility wiring to underground wiring on 240 Street. 1112 SD/090/06, 5% Money in Lieu of Parkland Dedication, 23267 Silver Valley Road, 13750 232 Street, Staff report dated September 19, 2007 recommending that the owner of the subject property.pay an amount that is not less than $49,800. 1113 SD/033/07, Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Amending Bylaw - Staff report dated September 19, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 6479-2007, to ensure that new subdivision and development proposals meet required servicing standards, be given three readings. 1114 Maple Ridge Transit Shelter Agreement Staff report dated September 24, 2007 recommending that staff negotiate an extension to the Agreement between the District of Maple Ridge and PaUlson Outdoor Advertising. 1115 26th Annual Haney-Harrison Road Relay, Use of Streets Staff report dated September 21, 2007 recommending the use of municipal streets be authorized for the 26th Annual Haney-Harrison Road Relay on Saturday, November 3, 2007. Committee of the Whole Agenda October 1, 2007 Page 4 of 5 FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERVICES (including Fire and Police) 1131 2008 Permissive Tax Exemptions Staff report dated September 24, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Tax Exemption Bylaw No. 6513-2007 be given three readings. COMMUNI7YDEVELOPMENTAND RECREATION SERVICES 1151 CORRESPONDENCE 1171 OTHER ISSUES 1181 7. ADJOURNMENT Committee of the Whole Agenda October 1, 2007 Page 5 of 5 8. COMMUNI7Y FORUM COMMUNITY FORUM The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to speak with Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). The total time for this Forum is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a response will be given. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. If a member of the public has a concern related to a Municipal staff member, it should be brought to the attention of the Mayor and/or Chief Administrative Officer in a private meeting. Other opportunities to address Council may be available through the office of the Manager of Legislative Services who can be contacted at 463-5221 or by e-mail at cmarIo@manleridge.ca . Checked bY.f&744 MAPLE RIDGE ,]E1llIgS]JM1JI*ilIIe1 British Columbia TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: September 04, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/095/06 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6511-2007 12636 228 ST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), to permit a 5 lot subdivision. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Bylaw No. 6511-2007 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and That the following term(s) and condition(s) be met prior to final reading. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; Road dedication as required; and Demolition of the existing house. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: PIVOTAL DEVELOPMENTS LTD WAYNE JACKSON Owner: PROGRESSIVE CONSTRUCTION LTD Legal Description: Lot: 3, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 5430Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 5430Lot: B, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 23424 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) 1101 Surrounding Uses North: South East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Existing Access: Proposed Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Single Family Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Agricultural Single Family Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) & RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 0.444 HA 22811, Street Road to be dedicated To be provided as part of subdivision servicing agreement SD/095/06 Project Description: Application RZ/095/06 proposes to rezone the property located at 12636 228 ST from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). This application is in support of subdivision application SD/095/06, which is for a 5 lot subdivision. The proposed size of each tot is not less than 572 m 2. Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan (OCP): The subject property is designated Urban Residential under the OCP. The proposal to rezone the lots to RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) for 5 one family residential lots is supported by the OCP. Zoning Bylaw: The proposed development complies with the Zoning Bylaw requirements. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property into 5 lots which meet the minimum lot width, lot depth, and lot area requirements of the RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone. There is an existing dwelling that will be demolished. -2- Subdivision Bylaw: A review of the plans in relation to the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw has determined that the proposal complies. The Engineering Department has determined that the proposed road meets the minimum carriageway width required for the subdivision. The District will acquire the remaining road dedication when the property to the south is subdivided. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Deøartment: The Engineering Department reviewed the proposed development and provided their comments as follows: Deficient services which could be provided by rezoning servicing agreement are: a. Widen the east side of the 228 Street road to collector width including concrete curb and concrete sidewalk. Road dedication will be required as a condition of receiving final reading. At the subdivision stage the storm sewer service connections will be at an elevation at the property line of not less that 10.Om and the Minimum Basement Elevations will be set at not less than elevation 10.6m. These elevations might have to be higher, depending upon the current Flood Construction Elevation for the South Alouette River at 228 Street. The subject property is not in the floodplain, but the storm sewer system serving the area outlets to the River and is subject to surcharging. The current Flood Construction Elevation for the Alouette River at 228 must be determined in order that the subdivision servicing design can be prepared in accordance with the current elevation. The applicant will be required to submit a geotechnical report to the Planning Department as a condition of their subdivision to determine the Flood Construction Elevation for the Alouette River at 228 Street. At the subdivision stage, the storm sewer on site will be designed to be as deep as possible and as flat as possible, and will be designed to capture drainage from an urban developed catchment area; the catchment area will be based on possible development area and not just topographic elevations. If the road will not be extended east then a proper, ultimate, 14 metre radius cul-de- sac is required. The subject site is located just within the urban area boundary, butthe properties to the east are boa ted outside of the urban area boundary and are unlikely to redevelop at an urban scale. -3- The application sketch shows that the construction of a full-width Local Urban standard road (8.6 metre carriageway) with additional right-of-way dedication to be provided by the adjacent property. At the subdivision stage, future lots along the south side of the subdivision road must be provided with service connections so the road does not have to be excavated when the land to the south subdivides. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional 5 trees which is based on one tree per lot; final subdivision design will provide exact numbers. Fire Department: The Fire Department reviewed the proposed development and provided their comments as follows: Turnaround • Must be of a solid surface that can be kept clear in all weather conditions. • Must be able to sustain a weight of 35,000 kg's • Required to be a minimum 6 metres wide and 8 metres in depth. • Clearly signed no parking/no stopping - emergency turnaround Current Houses • Once the current houses are vacant, they are to be maintained secure against unauthorized entry at all times, as well as during the demolition phase until such time as they are totally demolished. • If a vacant house catches on fire, owner of property is subject to the costs of firefighting. The proposal meets the Fire Department's requirements. CONCLUSION: The density of the proposed RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone conforms to the land use designation in the OCP and is consistent with the surrounding neighbourhood. It is therefore recommended that application RZ/095/06 be favourably considered and that Maple Ridge Zone Amendment Bylaw No. 6511-2007 (Appendix C) be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing. -4- Prepared fi*'&nni*g Technician prov Jane-Pi, MCP, MCIP Z~QD7o of n Approved by: Fynk Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Put?7 Wp & De I ment Services Concurrence: J. L. (Jirn Rule Chief 3ministrative Officer / The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Proposed subdivision layout Appendix C - Bylaw No. 6511-2007 -5- N N N 17 *2771 N I 45 4 1 12171 12762 25 *2760 I 12756 63 16 12157 *2152 12149 14 0 A 15 12743 27 42 IMP 9370 8 [io 12742 12732 *2747 1 12740 12733 2 3 14 LMP 28 40 39 _______ LMP 35902 12737 *2730 12729 127 AVE. 27 12728 37 38 ___________ 23 12724 A 12727 30 I 01 IMP 37579 , 12720 12717 *9 1 i I 53 54 55 56 I I 127*8 31 12710 LMP 1494 12718 12710 12709 LMP' 12700 _______________________ I SI R 1 12712 a. 0.. 12711 2 32 14909 —' LMP I LMP 13073 , 1 2 6 1 2 3 . Rem4 -\ \ - I - I - I - 127 127 PLACE P5430 1270* 'vE. N __T AGR C ' 2 1*2689 8 '-390 4 LM 44903 - . I 10 7 6 P 31436 46 2 P 22339 / / ?O 22 g \ 8 7 ! A/ B// \ I /12671 I 23 99 19 12669 2/13 14 I 159 I 16\174NN - 12643 12631 MP 1373 26 P6821 P6 62 366 0 ; co 8 . 2co9 If) 367 cq ' 21 0) BALABANIAN CIRCLE 388 0. 389 P 686 1 P 69262 397 22734 391 92fl3939240 22735 371 3 PARK N P 7779 1 1 I 4 5 7 \65 4 3 211 \22729__N 7 6 8 125AAvE. 13 I < 22733 22754 -- - B Rem3 P23424 P5430 A RP22408 12610 - 12588 P77079 PM6 Iak — 2 59 60 61 P352 6 3 4 (\ i. 126A .J -JV I V:4 Sk Y - V.O '1 58 P84 a. - . P 52 42 43 44 45 46 11 12 13 14 !f707 18 19 fl :1 8 1516 17 T_ --72 1 M 34 31 f3t. . A SCALE 1:2.500 District of Pitt Meadows V.ly d li I 12636-228 St /. CORPORATION OF is • ••"• i •_____________ 40.0 goo- 1 M ,6 •J cv I I • 2 S . •. •• i t1 )_ tç J say _ -- ___ p., __ __•. . ______ 0 -J U, ID 0 0 -'3 CA) 0 0 I 0 rn 2 x m 2 'C C 2 2 m 2 -I r ./ -*-4- - • - / 1- r I 10 f1T • 7 I J Damax Cnsuftants Ltd. I' • 312- 750'Termlnal Ave V:Z-/ c 1 , • Vancouver,1 BC. V6A 2M I I • • tel. 224-687 Fax 689-38E 03 C 4 03 Co C C \3 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 65 11-2007 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6511-2007.' That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot B, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 23424 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1409 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District) Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of A.D. 200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER H 72710 72709 I12710 ILMP 14909 LMP 12700 Li 8.0 LMP 14909 19.3 -Mp 1 T 3 LI 1 2 3 4 5 12 704 d 127FLACE AVL o CN In C7 72677 10 C'N 9 8 7 NN _ LMP 12710 Il 1 9 12669 E ____ 24 8 72643 1 636 0.443 h 12637 1393 26 62: 366/ A / RP 4 2 R b /357L0 CN NIN / '73 0.443 ha -R 68618A 72670 22733 12588 1 2 597 22740 P 77079 P 84690 15.0 369 1 12578 2750 22734 20.3 // EP 8 F26.2 22760 I / 22 370 39 5 .LE RDGE ZONE AMENDNC :ow No. 6511-2007 ,cp No. 1409 orn: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) R— 1 (Residential District) 4" IMAPLE RIDGE 1:1500 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: September 24, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ,/1O3/05 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: CoW SUBJECT: Rezoning - First Extension 23004 Dewdney Trunk Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant for the above noted file has applied for an extension to this rezoning application under Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. This application is to permit a child day care facility under the P-2 (Special Institutional) zone. An Official Community Plan Amendment is also required to designate the property Institutional in support of the proposed land use. RECOMMENDATION: That a one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/103/05 and that the following conditions be addressed prior to consideration of final reading: i) Registration of a Rezoning Development Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Bheemdev Meetarbhan Owner: 0505633 BC Ltd. Legal Description: Parcel A (RP 7941) Lot 1, Except: part dedicated Road on Plan NWP87590, Section 17, Township 12, Plan 3179, NWD OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Proposed: Institutional Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: P-2 (Special Institutional) 1102 Surrounding Uses North: Use: Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Vacant CD-2-95 Community Commercial Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Pioneer Village RE (Elderly Citizens Residential) Urban Residential Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Eagles Hall Child Day Care 893 m 2 230 Street Full Urban VP/ 103/05 This application is to permit a child day care facility under the P-2 (Special Institutional) zone. A requirement of the development process excluded the site into a Development Permit Area due to the proposed institutional use. The following dates outline Council's consideration of the application and Bylaw/s 6393 - 2006 and 6392 - 2006: - The First Reading report (see attached) was considered on June 13, 2006; - First Reading was granted June 13, 2006 - Public Hearing was held July 18, 2006; - Second and Third reading was granted on July 25, 2006. Application Progress: The applicant has encountered some medical challenges last year, hence the request for a one year extension. The major outstanding item is a Rezoning Development Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement. The applicant requests more time to fulfill the condition for final reading due to the pressing demands in terms of time and finance related to his personal situation. Alternatives: Council may choose one of the following alternatives: grant the request for extension; deny the request for extension; or repeal third reading of the bylaw and refer the bylaw to Public Hearing. -2- CONCLUSION: The proposed child day care use licensed under theCommunity Care and Assisted Living Act, at this property located at 23004 Dewdney Trunk Road is the subject of this rezoning application. This facility proposes to care for up to 53 children, from toddlers to elementary school students with up to eight people as staff members. The existing building (Eagles Hall) will be replaced with a new structure of residential type character that has been designed to comply with the licensing requirements. The new building will be located on the central portion of the property, with secured outdoor play area to the north and east side and off-street parking located south of the building. The property is designated Urban Residential as per the Official Community Plan and a corresponding OCP designation change to institutional is also necessary. The applicant has applied for a one year extension. It is anticipated that final consideration will be applied for within the next few months. : Prepared by: Rasika Acharya Plarer II MCIP -DIanning Approved byK Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Zrks Concurrence: J.L./(Jim) Rule C4ef Administrative Officer I The following appendices are attached hereto: Append ix A- Subject Map Appendix B - First Reading Report -3- I4 PPE)thy ' 384 310 12— 38 551 P45071 Rem A 00, 312 311 317 P49271 6CR 9320 4 5 P47120 P17941 SUBJECT PROPERTY DEWDNEYTRUNK ROAD Vfr 4 Rem 215 216 co P56520 IL P57491 231 223 224 218 217 Pd.1 EP10384 P34984 152 151 / 150 11256 tI11976 P46838 109 .148 8 11927 91920 11927 110 147 co 11931 11920 IL 111 146 11913 11971 6 11910 23004 DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. /\ I CORPORATION OF N MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE SCALE 1:1,500 DATE: Nov 9, 2005 FILE: RZ/103105 BY: PC AP?E*blx 'e CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: June 1, 2006 Ri/i 03/05 CofW SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6392-2006 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6393-2006 23004 Dewdney Trunk Rd EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to P-2 (Special Institutional) to permit a child day care facility. In support of the land use an Official Community Plan Amendment is also required to designate the property Institutional. RECOMMENDATIONS: That, acknowledging that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6392-2006 has been considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan, Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6392-2006 be read a first time and forwarded to Public Hearing; That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6393-2006 be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and That the following term and condition be met prior to final reading. i) Registration of a Rezoning Development Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Bheemdev Meetarbhan Owner: 0505633 BC Ltd. Legal Description: Parcel A (RP 7941) Lot 1, Except: part dedicated Road on Plan NWP87590, Section 17, Township 12, Plan 3179, NWD Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses North: South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: OCP: Existing: Single Family Residential (18 Units Per Net Ha) Proposed: Institutional RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) P-2 (Special Institutional) Vacant CD-2-95 Community Commercial Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Single Family Residential (18 upnh) Pioneer Village RE (Elderly Citizens Residential) Single Family Residential (18 upnh) Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Compact Housing (40 upnh) Eagle Hall Child Day Care 893 m2 230 Street Full Urban VP/103/05 Property located at 23004 Dewdney Trunk Road is the subject of this rezoning application to permit a child day care use licensed under the Community Care and Assisted Living Act. The facility proposes to care for up to 53 children, from toddlers to elementry school students. The facility will be staffed by up to eight people. The existing building (Eagle Hall) will be replaced with a new structure of residential type character that has been designed to comply with the licensing requirements. The new building will be located on the central portion of the property, with secured outdoor play area to the north and east side and off-street parking located south of the building. Access to the parking area is from 230 Street. The Eagle Hall, will be moved to Pioneer Park and used by community groups. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The property is designated Single Family Residential 18 upnh. The proposed P-2 (Special Institutional) zone will require an OCP amendment to Institutional. The Institutional designation for the proposed use is not predetermined and is site specific. Accordingly, with favorable support for rezoning the corresponding OCP designation change is also necessary. -2- Zoning Bylaw: Part 9, Section 903(2)(c) states that all buildings and structures shall be sited not less than 7.5 meters from all lot lines. The developer is requesting a variance for the setback from the exterior side lot line, 230 Street, from 7.5 meters to 4.5 meters. This will be brought forward for Council's consideration with application VP/103/05. Development Information Meeting: On May 19, 2006 a development information meeting was held in the Eagle Hall. A few people attended the meeting and most were residents of Pioneer Village located directly east of the subject property. Those attendees were interested to find out what the proposed land use was and reviewed the plans displayed at the meeting. Comments included concern for the children's safety while others expressed support for the day care use in this neighborhood. interdepartmental implications: Engineering Department: Prior to final zoning approval the owner must enter into a rezoning development agreement to provide for the upgrading of 230 " Street to urban standard and remove the existing driveway let- down on the Dewdney Trunk Road frontage. The agreement will also address the upgrade of service connections and street trees. When staff were initially asked to review this application there was concern related to traffic generation and the amount of accessory off-street parking provided for the use. As a consequence the applicant commissioned a traffic study. The study identifies that daycare traffic patterns are not like school traffic patterns. The daycare arrival times are spread out, occurring over a couple of hours, unlike school arrival times which occurs within approximately twenty minutes of the bell. As a consequence of the staggered start time the staff schedule is also staggered. The report concludes that the 15 off-street parking spaces is adequate for the peak drop off and pick-up demands and more than adequate for staff parking demands. It further states that, "the traffic and parking impact of the proposed daycare is not significant and will be perceived by the neighbourhood as an improvement over the existing usage of the site". intergovernmental issues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial PlanICapital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. -3- CONCLUSION: In support of the proposed day care use it is recommended that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6392-2006 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6393-2006 be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Prepared by: avid Stevenson Planning Technician Approved by: Jane Eff1ering, M , CIP Director of Plann /fr"LApproved by: Frank Quinn, P.Eng., PMP $M: Public Works & Development Services Th Concurrencfr J.L. (Jim) Rule iA 1 Chief Adinmistrative Officer DS/bjc The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix I - Subject Property Appendix II- OCP Amending Bylaw 6392-2006 Appendix ifi - Zone Amending Bylaw 63 93-2006 Appendix P1- Site Plan Appendix V - Building Elevations Appendix VI- Landscape Plan -4- CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6392 - 2006 A By-law to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; - AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "B" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This By-law may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amendment By-law No. 6392 - 2006." That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Parcel A (Reference Plan 7941), Lot 1, Except: Part dedicated Road on Plan NWP87590, Section 17, Township 12, Plan 3179, New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 723, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, is hereby redesignated to Institutional. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan By-law No. 5434 1996 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. REAl) A FIRST TIME the day of PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of READ A SECOND TIME the day of READ A THIRD TIME the day of RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the MAYOR A.D. 200. A.D. 200. ,A.D.200. A.D. 200. dayof ,A.D.200. CLERK CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BY-LAW NO. 6393 - 2006 A By-law to amend Map "A" forming part of ZoningBy-law No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510 - 1985 as aniended; NOW TREREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the Distnct of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This by-law may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending By-law No. 6393 - 2006." That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Parcel A (Reference Plan 7941), Lot 1, Except: Part dedicated Road on Plan NWP87590, Section 17, Township 12, Plan 3179, New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1366 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this by-law, is/are hereby rezoned to P-2 (Special Institutional) Maple Ridge Zoning By-law No. 3510- 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the dayof ,A.D.200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. REAl) a second time the day of , A.D. 200. REAl) a third time the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of A.D. 200. MAYOR CLERK ZONING: CD-2-95 ZONING: RE EU)EREY CITIZENS RESID€NTW. ZONING: CS-I SEffICE-COthtRt1& PROPOSED ZONiNG: P2 ZONING: PS- I SPECW. INSIITW1OM. ONE FNIIIY URBAN RtSIDENTL*t momewel- I Li_All1!11 IL E INFORMATION DAYCARE INFORMATION (I) ID MELOPMENT n•1 1iaia. — - -. 9210 •. w.r --. a-.! u U ral .IP • a- wow JOHN McCORMACIC ARCHITECTS I PROPOSED DAYCAPE aoc. _ - St 1EPU4 NOTES •U-e .__ u_I J 1— • — a a - .._ r 'A' 1111111 AA'A' •• IIIIIJIc • ••UU• I•• •U l ocim !IIUI guIuIuuuIuuuIuIuuuIItIuIIuflhuIuuu : U . !:i[ IlIuI IIIII.IIIIIIIu -. = ..ua I.... •L]U 1fl U... ' - sa, I W6tUU i V.. ji NI NO I i lii11 11111111111 iii U liii - _______________________________ • iRIuuuiiitiuuuiHIuuuuI I 1:1 _______________MUNI I!= "II E* PEVP4Y 1UNK RO.&P '-V A - - bitt LHT.CAF PLAN 11.0*0 PLANT LIST •t.tOI. aMlSUfl DOThJSI8. M*S.l! C01440W ti4 ntm M i$,. P I CrcIdIØI5lt,t JCltt Kl,I TIll •C, £0, 00 0e4*ies Q I Con. . t.q,tI..W'e frI..flW 0054000 II Cat an e.cmws. tlllUnt scaT IS.cvol 000T boOlO40 03 COlt • 0OM5440t '3 COt IS La.COthOO .sIIIrIt Coon MccotlO. .2 Colt, • ptIotM. front Pt,eIIS. fl Colt. S TS.Ot,20 ItOtt,0 rnoo'S.S 0400tI' boOboo clbol,,, II COt SSPCOCVt5 to 4etSotL.l0t VelflI VOWS.!? .f v000n.? s. KflSCAt*C* II Cat 000. - I I Clc. 0. VtltV IPHI 1.201,0 ,0IStIfl II Cat.. 30 00 II ft.att.* #011100100,000 S sca 004100 I Odd playol. •I Colt.. I Oh. MS 1000l Mc,0lMS TO COtl tO Ito idOl 001000 flOOd CocOon !?00 act LIMIT flp!IWVTOO TOO pfl.at*0.WPT TIP 4.0050200 S043Tt1 conIc, 1.00,4500 .nC,aOdt,.00 To rant.. cnon co,0,cva. moo-alo.00Ol flea.,. 00,.cIa oc WI. 001t. #cO 4.00,4.000 OCIOIOdT Alit 5a.c* Is.bS VttTJ?T 0*0 PIntodja. IS'cIfl tOt tO OOTOSOO 23000*0000 r •'iLV'. hI %1o. .4_It. WW — to .t0. t23 04_WIlt 44005.004 _Iltt 0 Co_son.. PRCPOW PAYGAM B($t.PIN6 4 000001. T*0O PD 40 1.brn P,.ca S.- 61 5040 4., Vt 4. MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: September 19, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: DP/065/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Development Permit 11282 COTtONWOOD DR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application for a Multi-Family Development Permit has been received for 11282 Cottonwood Drive. The purpose of the Multi-Family Development Permit is to enhance existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs and minimize potential conflicts on neighbouring land uses. This development permit will amend development permit DP/067/05, which was in support of a 71 unit phased townhouse development under the old OCP. The new proposal will result in the same number of units; however, 2 units will be relocated to different buildings on the site as recommended by their geotechnical engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/065/07 respecting property located at 11282 COTtONWOOD DR. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: MEADOWS AT VERIGIN'S RIDGE INC Owner: MEADOWS AT VERIGIN'S RIDGE INC Legal Description: Lot: A, Section: 16, Township: 12, Plan: BCP25353 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) 1103 Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family and Multi-Family Residential & Park Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential), RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), & RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation Urban Residential & Conservation South: Use: Vacant Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Urban Residential & Conservation East: Use: Park Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Conservation West: Use: Single Family Residential & Park Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Conservation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion & Associated Applications b) Project Description: Multi-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential 2.12 ha Cottonwood Drive Full Urban SD/118/06, SD/027/07, SD/028/07, SD/043/07, and DP/067/05 The applicant is applying for an amendment to DP/067/05, which was for a 71 unit phased strata townhouse development under the old OCP. The amendment will result in the same number of units, but includes deleting a unit from Building 11 and adding a unit to Building 8 in Phase 4 and deleting a unit from Building 12 and adding a unit to Building 14 in Phase 5. These amendments are required as a result of the geotechnical report written by Golder Associates Ltd. and dated July 27, 2007. A plan of the geotechnical setback line has been attached and the recommendation from Golder Associate regarding the relocation of units is as follows: The access roadway that was originally proposed to traverse this area has been relocated northward and outside the zone of visible soil movement. To accommodate this northern shift in the access roadway alignment, proposed dwelling units have been deleted from proposed Buildings #11 and #12 and relocated elsewhere on site at least 6 m upsiope from the geotechnical setback zone (see Figure 1). The area where soil movements were detected is now a landscaping area that includes no structures, utilities, retaining walls or associated facilities. C) Planning Analysis: The Multi-Family Development Permit was established to enhance existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs and minimize potential conflicts on neighbouring land uses. -2- The key guideline concepts for this development permit are as follows: New development into established areas should respect private spaces, and incorporate local neighbourhood elements in building form, height, architectural features and massing. The proposed development respects the private spaces of adjacent properties by incorporating a variety of landscaping along the perimeter of the site as shown on the attached landscape plan. The proposed development is of similar form, height, and massing as the surrounding townhouse developments. Transitional development should be used to bridge areas of low and high densities, through means such as stepped building heights, or low rise ground oriented housing located to the periphery of a higher density developments. The proposed development is inline with other townhouse developments in the area. This low rise ground oriented housing is a good transition from the single family dweing developments in the area. Park land and onsite landscaping also act as a buffer and allows for smoother transition from single family dwellings to townhouses. Large scale developments should be clustered and given architectural separation to foster a sense of community, and improve visual attractiveness. This is not a large scale development. Pedestrian circulation should be encouraged with attractive streetscapes attained through landscaping, architectural details, appropriate lighting and by directing parking underground where possible or away from public view. There is a proposed pedestrian walkway at the rear of the property that leads to the existing park land. There will be adequate landscaping along Cottonwood Drive. lnterna roads will also be landscaped. A play area and community gardens will promote outdoor activities and pedestrian circulation. All proposed unit have garages and ground level visitor parking will be surrounded by landscaping. d) Advisory Design Panel: DP/067/05 was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel on December 13, 2005. The Resolution from that meeting was: That the Advisory Design Panel was in general support of the project as presented. As the overall concept of the development has not changed and development permit DP/067/05 was supported by the Advisory Design Panel, this application was not forwarded to ADP for further comments. -3- e) Financial Implications: A refundable security totalling the landscaping costs for the entire project, as estimated by the project's landscape architect, has been submitted with DP/067/05 in the amount of $269,000.00; therefore, no further security is required. CONCLUSION: As the amendments are required to comply with the geotechnicat requirements of the site, it is recommended that DP/065/07 be approved. Frank Quinn, MBA, P. GM: PublicIorks &j L. (Jim) Rule iief Administrative Officer / The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Phased Subdivision Plan Appendix C - Building Elevations Services WE i P 938 41 11420 , 11 6 10 12'% PARK r 14 11440 7 f 13 j1 34 439 LM 37 11355 8 9 38 15 11429 36 39 9 16 i1419 17 11409 1j*A'J 35 18 11399 34 LMP 11097 11356 11389 32 33 19 PARK LMS PARK \ 30 29 1 20 11311 9. LMS 3295 LMP 0825 B 24 353 RK 11282 BCP 25353 BCP 25353 - A PARK Subject Property 11261 Q 11252 P 27689 14 CIO PcI. A LMP 36954 PARK PARK BCP25876 90 45 1 —s-- _2 Distnct of Pitt Meadows Laney— 11 I 1282 Cottonwood Dr S 12 Al ' ts 4 1 CORPORATION OF Hane, ____________ ¶ 4-li THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE District PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley DATE: Aug 17, 2007 0P1065107 BY: PC SCALE 1:2,500 _____ • I flK MS quap fl,u I I .9 butpkVIS .5. on *10 t WISI 0 OS'S S AS'S n.p.l..vac S MAIMS 'St ClOD *10 I 5 'It 515 fl_al .II1 1111,510 A OUD • 1s it ii i_aq.avli a an. MS It 010,'. 11,0.5 •1.1K 10,0,01 5 V11s1g10 '5.0.151 • *1_a '1.1001 10110 KODI• 11115l5 'A 0510'. 41,55. I It 1111 101051 g.m_as V 1111110 5051€_a 1055 11,55, trim_at trim.. '.105 trImt a trIaD.. S_a5SS01 trIO (t5 amltreaCt . Cu OOCV n - WI_a 010€ 411141'. 101C MA 0055 - 515555 5 K_al SI,, 105101051 VatS A1 ,v tat -v_alas Cas at.. 1511a11 5 5155 y5fl 3155 1 ( 5V.LYG INM4J0lW,3d NY1d gilS -rlY?ia,; wa iffi4 iurL !'11 jil WIN 'I LEFT 9IOE ELEVATION © REAR ELEVATION ©TlDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION 5(I1tUVLt yr riitit 0 SW Ma.u, ene elfl PMCIA aWT,L wvt gem L4 T1 .mefldC1A vw Mp.W ewe wane na.c.w. me .meme in, €1 mewe it, © .me .ua ,wea - nfline tee r CSMR S tee © 'me me met, CILVinVUTOS eutLr'IN&j FRONT ELEVATION RI I4T 5OE ELEVATION Li hir d !, Hilli beII I" SCHERLE OF FIHISHE!, 0 tr ee00w.Jn 20 pO rpca — e aa * RL10 •.SSMOMOT 0 n.m €1 0 — fl10 ?CC MO MO IAfl laS V0,a, ,w.c, Ice 0 MO Ia. POW OW ITO. L SUILIN * ii_J --MO—. REAR ELEVATION LEFT 9IPE ELEVATION II 9 FRONT ELEVATION Jc ,:31PE ELEVATION I Hiii netI dsn Ill 33.-Il — S mmw- '1' [euILIN& 1 21 ——--.---*—: * :..—H REAR ELEVATIOI4 Ee-HEMXE OF FINISHES 0 0 nc In WIt ,*ne 00It is Isis lIsi ,aatw Minis kin. 0 0 • 33s Isis SI - this VisIth& - MC 3371011_is © v-c. Slisylny Ice. VO4 ChUM — USC CALTISI *100 @ rQI4T tLVATQN ,CEDIIE OF FINI*IE 0 aft await .win .a. Ix. .a Tfl4 a i Peon 0 0- 0 0 © — saina MO lAtiwi lapse © Na.pcy .win — SOC losla 0 — ace c...a stat i!th I 0 J J1 111 atI — LEFT 9IPE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION I BUILVINCY * 4 I MAPLGE ritish CoLumbia DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: FROM: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer DATE: September 13, 2007 FILE NO: DP/090/06. DVP/090/06 ATrN: CofW SUBJECT: Development Permit 23267 Silver Valley RD, 13750 232 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Thirty-one townhouse units have been proposed at 23267 Silver Valley Road and 13750 232 Street. This application is subject to the Development Permit Guidelines for Multi-Family development as outlined in the 2006 Official Community Plan. This proposal calls for a development variance to vary the required front yard setback in the RM-1 zone from the 7.5 metres required to the 4.5 metres proposed. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/090/06 respecting property located at 23267 Silver Valley Road and 13750 232 Street. And Further That, the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/090/06. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Damax Consultants David Laird Owner: Nag Construction Co Ltd Legal Description: Lot: 12 Except: Parcel "A" (explanatory Plan 23408), Section: 33, Township: 12, NWD, Plan: 19849 Parcel "A" (explanatory Plan 23408) Lot 12, Section 33, Township 12, NWD, Plan 19849 OCP: Existing: Medium / High Density Residential, Open Space Proposed: Medium / High Density Residential, Open Space 1104 Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low Density Urban, Low/Medium Density Residential, Open Space South: Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Medium Density Residential, Med/High Density Residential, Commercial, Conservation, Low Density Urban East: Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation West: Use: Residential Zone: CD-3-98 (Comprehensive Development), A-2 (Upland Agriculture Designation: Eco-Clusters, Medium Density Residential Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: Multi-Family Residential Access: Proposed 232A Street, Servicing: Full Urban Companion Applications: RZ/090/06, SD/090/06, DVP/071/07 a) Project Description: The subject property is located on the northeast corner of 232 Street and Silver Valley Road. The proposed project is for thirty-one - 2 1/2 storey townhomes, inspired from Frank Lloyd Wright architecture grouped into two, three and four unit buildings. The project would see the use of brick veneer on the bottom portion of the buildings and vertical vinyl siding above, with painted wood trim and asphalt shingles. All units would be clustered along an internal road within the site. Sixteen of the units have a single car garage with an additional parking spot in the driveway while the other fifteen units have a two-car garage designed side-by-side or in tandem. The garage doors will be recessed behind the balance of the façade and partially concealed by cantilevered sundecks as well as painted to match the surrounding cladding to minimize their effect. Additionally, each unit is designed with separate pedestrian entry off of 232 Street or Silver Valley Road with an individual gate or a rear patio entry from the greenbelt trail network depending on their siting within the complex. - - The project site features two entry features, one at the corner of 232 Street and Silver Valley Road and the other at the head of the greenway network designed for pedestrians and bicyclists. There also a considerable amount of amenity space that includes a children's play area, gazebo and through-site walkways. There are 8 visitor parking spaces, including one handicapped spot, have been incorporated throughout the site. Rainwater leaders will drain to splash pads. Run-off will be percolated into the ground via rock pits and treated in a bio-filtration pond and detention system before leaving the site. Non- permeable area will be minimized and new planting and ground cover will mimic the present forest floor where possible. The design also contains a detention/bio-filtration pond located at the northwest corner of the site to aid in stormwater management. b) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: These properties are subject to the guidelines applicable to Section 8.7 Multi-Family Development Permit Area Guidelines of the Official Community Plan that aim to regulate the form and character of a multi-family residential development. This development respects the key guideline concepts as outlined in this section. New development into established areas should respect private spaces, and incorporate local neighbourhood elements in building form, height, architectural features and massing. As one of the first multi-family projects in Silver Valley it is respectful of its single family counterpart as it is separated by the walkway and children's play area. Transitional development should be used to bridge areas of low and height densities, through means such as stepped building heights, or low rise ground oriented housing located to the periphery of a higher density developments. Each unit is ground oriented with pedestrian access to the street or to the public walkway. As a bridging feature, the development is designed to have the two storey portion of the units facing the single family development to the east. Large scale developments should be clustered and given architectural separation to foster a sense of community, and improve visual attractiveness. Although the project is not considered "large scale" all units would be clustered along an internal road within the site and grouped into two, three and four unit buildings. Pedestrian circulation should be encouraged with attractive streetscapes attained through landscaping, architectural details, appropriate lighting and by directing parking underground where possible or away from public view through screened parking structures or surface parking located to the rear of the property. -3- A generous amount of trees and shrubs are proposed around each building providing definition for both pedestrian and vehicular corridors. To avoid large paved areas, the visitor parking spaces have been divided into smaller groups and are located throughout the residential complex and have been surrounded with landscaping strips to further soften their appearance. The garage doors will face inward and will not be seen from the street. Additional they will be recessed behind the balance of the façade and partially concealed by cantilevered sundecks as well as painted to match the surrounding cladding to minimize their effect. Development Variance Permit To increase the relationship the townhouses have with the Street frontage, a development variance is being sought by the applicant to vary the 7.5 metre front yard setback required in RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone to the 4.5 metres proposed. As there is no parking or driveway located in the front yard of the townhouse development, this 3 metre reduction will give the structures a friendlier Street image along 232 Street and Silver Valley Road. Advisory Design Panel: This application was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel at their June 12, 2007 meeting. The Panel was supportive of the project as presented and made the following resolution; The Advisory Design Panel has reviewed the proposal and supports the general concept and commends the applicant on the quality of presentation and supporting documents. Financial Implications: A refundable security in the amount of 2.5% of the total construction costs will be required with this Development Permit. Based on an estimated construction value of $3,950,000.00 the security will be $98,750.00. There will be 52 trees added to the municipal street tree inventory on completion of this project. The costs associated with maintaining these trees will need to be included in a subsequent operating budget. CONCLUSION: As the development proposal complies with the guidelines for the Multi-family Development Permit Area for form and character, it is recommended that DP/090/06 be given favorable consideration. -4- C C/' Prepared by. / \lenCsikos NJ ç lflThqg Technician A~,ved V~Icker plann CP,MCIP ing Approved by:/ Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurr7nc" j4[ui ' '' C ief'dmini rative Officer / The following apper/dices e attached hereto: Appendix A - Subje t Pr erty Appendix B - Site PLBYK Appendix C - Colours Materials Appendix 9 - Elevations Appendix E - Landscape Plans -5- 25 13910 'I L y <' Rem3 /13812 it ZONING eSTEPLAN DP-1.O L ZONING PLAN 1607 ALL OIM(NSS HAVE OTEN CONAER ItO rROAI IMPERIAL TO NEIR1C AND ARE PRO'D(O IN ROTH. DTSSGR MUAMUU BASEMENT ELEvATION TO BE CONTIRMTD WHEN rINAL GRADING PLAN IS APPROVED, of ilverValleytownhouse 232STREET dev&opment I I 232 STREET & SILVER VALLEY ROAD, MAWI1I5 I. AT LII P " ,j l 4 - — V k - I VV:1V •W - -. V V • . V Ii Vl L VVV VA - -- I,V ç; • V. ... i~m V V VV r • II 14 _cI:1 t I. VI I41. 1V L I • V T y p e 1 IftYIP TflLLIT IC M u ii d i n g (Unit Type:B-A-D) aft t o Bulding Tyi,. I Front (Ion.) F1.vntloo for Bolding Typo I RoorCreor Buff.r) tlorotloo for Bufldlng Typo j S1d•nto)El.-U- for Pulding Typo Silver Valley townhouse development 232 STREET & SILVER vALLE::MAp BUILDING ELEVATIONS DP-2.1B BUILDING L. ELEVATIONS Boffer) Etonof ton for BoNding To 2 Tgp. 2 SilverValle) ' townhouse development I: 232 STREET & SILVER VALLEY ROAD 0:LE U " ATE LIER p F • (Unit Type:B-A-B) T y p e 2 - 10.010 0*1cC? 00. Front (Lone) flonotlon (or BuNdIng 1po 2 BUILDING ELEVATIONS DP-2.2B BUILDING ELEVATIONS Freon.) Devotion for Bunding Type 3 IIL010 VALLIYUO. Muliding Type 3 (Unit Type: D-C-A-D 1) fl.oUon 3 ReorGroe' Boffe, / SIl VoI.y Rood) Eleootlon for Bfdb,q 1p. 3 otIoo for OofdlnR TW. 3 Silver Valley townhouse development 232 STREET & SILVER VALLEY ROAD, MAPI1uià' I BUILDING ELEVATIONS DP-2.3B BUILDING ELEVATIONS -. for Botdlng Tw' 4 H---- Roor232 Streot) O000Uon for Dotdk,q Tçe4 ;i::) oUOflforøoInQTW. 4 Silver Valley townhouse developmën 232 STREET & SILVER vALLE:RoADPLE t uiIding (Unit Type: F-E 1-F1 ) T y p e 4 OPLYIR VALLU0... fl.00tlon for aundtng Io 4 BUILDING ELEVATIONS DP-2.4B BUILDING ELEVATIONS :.. _a U R•• .. . ..• ua 311rII : 1,311 UIraiI ir fijj ITIi "iñ( aMIL&= - - i1 J 4.= -~- RorJ232 St,..t) E.orUof for 80dlng Typ, 8 SId.tI.00tton for BoNdg Type 8 Is i ver Vallev townhouse dveIopment H - 232 STREET & SILVER VALLEY ROAD MAPLE fID PL WrELig T y p e 6 sId..ortIr for BuIdbr9 Type 5 - Liwi ..I SILVIC YALLSY *8. uiIding (Unit Type: F-F1 ) O(OO•) fl.otIo.r for flofldb,9 T. 8 - - BUILDING ELEVATIONS DP-2.6B BUILDING ELEVATIONS 11111! IIiIIEi1iiItI Ii •,uiI 111111 = = it itiiiiiiiiiiii • I !!uI 01I! ar Ab 4 3 6. Bench CrushedRockPath. 4 Bench Cda V Picnic Tabla and Trash Bin SF,I.CUCSfl..C.OPT&I. am L Asp !E 1 SDMIt4 . --- As halt Path 0 ProposedSrmSewer UnitPavers#1 L[_assii.4. H 76 ProposedWatertune SCkdTh*.Q, ((fl)LJ1RI) \\ Asphalt Path 5..b.ae.o - - Proposed SandaryS T. := SR VALLEY TOWNHOME 24 — Overall Tree Planting Plan(168 required replacement trees) I I , neuEui.ie no C) ) -232STREET- 1H I Tt p!a11 Shtub and Perenn!a! Le9end cmpjc ___4_ -------- - 5- - 'S - !• . .. - '113 ! '""- •-'-' 291 p. •" ? " / ;5. coo - - / S LE-J D * — üID-\RI WAY TOWNHOMES CNI TT Vj C? Concrete Sidewalk s_ cs Th* Split Rail Fence - 232A STREET ii TW J. '1 ---. Pathway Crushed Granite II I I 4. 1-L 'L J TREE PLANTING DETAIL 'fflI vi:y --- - ill - - - / Proposed SanttarySewer MaiboxTreHis > 5..250- ) I r - ceo. so.oe. M \ ti ( / Y — /' ProposedWaterline I E Bench /7 CD coo - - ° - - Overall Tree Planting Plan(168 required replacement ees) c' ( ) - SILVER VALLEY ::0MEs CD CD CNI IL $7.1 VAURY SO. 232* SILVER R*ERIOOBC 0J - NV LV NMI 7:350 Overall Shrub and Perennial Legend - --...---,---- -.-..------------- — 232A STREET Code BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME OUANI1IY SIZE REMARKS - PQsi!P --------- - A 4 -- - - - Co Cai— otnup.Lo ------------ . .... - - Fl Fo7.ythAO10IE7ode . . . ! -. r.. c QmqTwIg Owd 125 ------ E 10 Pb P b133*fl* Sope2be C B 00 171 SP4 PlAnt dm0., Inn V is' ... c,oeibony 113 Spa - - S. leo, ! y P0LthA77 sop.7'P!90! Sy79PlPiiE9'p1R - Poeoanr.TMGrO3V . cononSnoiP.. 7 - 344 - 29 P4 .P SP4 PlAnt 35 220.0., - SP - Plenjdmoo SP4 PIAn!ADDbOwn dm0KS0. - TI Vd T1pEoIetikAe - Vpurnon,deo0de - ROodr0300 030idVibVonVn 86 22 PIAnIeDet7OwD j..t 0)t*8023r,SASe) -- - I CA S [ & 4. 5 - S7 - - S K3V0.000L013272) ASV0.stSpnybs fl.fli l5OmnOC LMAII 00.2 \ M000Sde 0.00. po,y9o.,um I i ------ DETAIL - . \ SHRUB PLANTING Nil H 0..,AOC - . S - T.d - SILVER VALLEY TOWNHOMES cc 50500*0. 333* $Y & SIlVER VALLEY RD. CL RApt_I RIDGe, BC 01 Lo on , I_uui 3M SSS• Ridge fL(53 _ [1JAsphalt peta!I 4 - Split Rail Fence SCALE: 1:20 1 '1 mod F' LI Seating Detail SCALE: 1:20 Rec Tec Model SCALE: nt.s. ------- - .17 - SVER VALLEY TOWNHOMES 13 r3TI Trellis on Mail SCALE: 1:25 ji r61 I I it J Seating Trellis SCALE: n.t.s. T. DADO AT ALL CORNERS I 20mm (314") CLEAR CEDAR I CLADDING van der Zalrn + associates CAULKED MILLED CEDAR CAP IN WO PIECES BEVELED 20mm (3/4") MOLDING, MNITERED AT CORNERS AND CAULKED 20x65mm (3/4°x2 1/2") CEDAR PICKETS, 40mm (1 1/2") APART FASTENED TO BEVELED 50x100mm (2"x4") W/ STAINLESS STEEL NAILS 20mm (3/4") CEDAR CLADDING W/ SHIPLAP JOINTS AT CORNERS FASTENED TO lOOxlOOmm (4x4") PT WOOD POST WI STAINLESS STEEL NAILS OPTIONAL BASE CLADDING 5x75x500mm (1/43x20") STEEL BAR SET IN CONCRETE, NOTCHED INTO POST AND ATTACHED WI COUNTYER SUNK STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS, PRIME AND PAINT TOP 300mm (12") 200mm (8") MIN. DIA. CONCRETE PIER FORMED BY PAPER TUBE FORM SET IN ROUND HOLE. SUBEGRADE *nOt to scale Fence Detail Silver Valley Townhomes 11IiIeI DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: September 05, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: VP/071/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: CoW SUBJECT: Variance Permit 23267 SILVER VALLEY RD, 13750 232 ST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Development Variance to the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 4800-1993 is being sought by the applicant. The proposal includes a request to vary the requirement to convert to underground wiring fronting the proposed RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone. This variance request is supported by Council Policy 9.05 RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal VP/071/07 respecting property located at 23267 SILVER VALLEY RD and 13750 232 ST DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Damax Consultants David Laird Owner: Nag Construction Co Ltd Legal Description: Lot: 12 Except: Parcel "A" (explanatory Plan 23408), Section: 33, Township: 12, NWD, Plan: 19849 Parcel "A" (explanatory Plan 23408) Lot 12, Section 33, Township 12, NWD, Plan 19849 OCP: Existing: Medium / High Density Residential, Open Space Proposed: Medium / High Density Residential, Open Space Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) 1105 Surrounding Uses North: Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low Density Urban, Low/Medium Density Residential, Open Space South: Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Medium Density Residential, Med/High Density Residential, Commercial, Conservation, Low Density Urban East: Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation West: Use: Residential Zone: CD-3-98 (Comprehensive Development), A-2 (Upland Agriculture Designation: Eco-Clusters, Medium Density Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Requested Variance: Vacant Multi-Family, single family Residential Proposed 232A Street, Silver Valley Road Full Urban Rezoning, Subdivision, Development Permit Maintain utility poles on east side of 232 street. b) Project Description: A development variance application has been made in support of a development plan for a 22 lot subdivision application (SD/090/06). The proposal will have one RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) lot and 21 single family lots. This application was made to support the retention of the above ground utility company plant along the east side of 232 Street. C) Planning Analysis: A Development Variance Permit is required to support retention of the above ground utility company plant along the east side of 232 Street. This DVP is supported by Council Policy 9.05, attached as Appendix B. CONCLUSIONS: Given that the variance request is supported by Council Policy, it is recommended that VP/045/07 be given favorable consideration. Preparedby: JenCsikos Planaing Technician MCIP Deetof of Planning Approved by: F/ank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrer7ce: J.L. (Jim) Rtile Chief AdninistrMive Officer /dp The following appendce, are attached hereto Appendix A - Subjectroperty Appendix B - Council Policy 9.05 -3- T 171 13994 P 2409 ,S2 \ 13910 EP28084 Rem 3 A District of ( Pitt Meadows 23267 SILVER VALLEY ROAD CORPORATION OF •. THE DISTRICT OF I - N MAPLE RIDGE District of <. Langley \._ :_±Li_J PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,500 DATE: Aug 31, 2007 FILE: \JP1071107 BY: PC 0.21~ta MAPLE RIDGE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE I,Cr posled 1 2 Sicniher. I TITLE: CONVERSION OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY WIRING TO UNDERGROUND WIRING POLICY NO. 9.05 APPROVAL DATE: July 23, 1996 POLICY STATEMENT: Council will support development variance permit applications to waive the requirement of Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 4800-1993 as amended, to provide underground wiring on highway right of ways serviced by existing overhead utility systems, where the abutting road is required to be upgraded to an urban standard, on the following conditions: The existing overhead utility system is shown on the attached plan, or There is less than a total of 250 metres of contiguous redevelopment potential fronting both sides of the highway right of way designated on the Official Community Plan. Further. in those cases where undergrounding of existing overhead utility lines is required, and a development has less than 250 metres of frontage on the highway right of way, the developer will service his development with underground dips off the overhead line and deposit with the Municipality sufficient funds to achieve the required undergrounding in the future. Date Printed: 200 7-09-19 Page 1 of 1 Policy 9.05 9 J / ( BC HYDRO 3 PHASE & '( '7 TELUS MAJOR OVERHEAD LINES L' 77 J .41• J 1I.IeI DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: September 5, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: VP/078/06 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: CoW SUBJECT: Variance Permit 24901 108 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Rezoning and Subdivision applications have been received for the property at 24901 108 Avenue to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit a subdivision into 22 lots. Each of the proposed lots meets the minimum lot width, lot depth and lot area requirements of the zone. A new local urban road is proposed that will intersect with the east side of 249 Street in 2 locations and provide access for each of the new lots. This Development Variance Permit application VP/078/06 has been received to vary the minimum standard width requirement for this new local urban road from 18.0 metres to 16.5 metres. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal VP/078/06 respecting property located at 24901 108 Avenue. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: B FW DEVELOPMENTS LTD. Owners: PROGRESSIVE CONSTRUCTION LTD BENCHMARK MANAGEMENT LTD Legal Description: Parcel A (Except Plan 33401), Lot 14, Section 11, Township 12, Plan 1363 OCP: Existing: Residential Low-Medium Density Proposed: . Residential Low-Medium Density 1106 Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation Residential Low-Medium Density South: Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Residential Low-Medium Density East: Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation Residential Low-Medium Density West: Use: Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Institutional (future school site) Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: 1.618 hectares (4.0 acres) Access: New local road from 249 Avenue Servicing: Full Urban to be provided with Subdivision Companion Applications: SD/078/06 and RZ/078/06 Requested Variance: To vary the minimum standard width requirement for a local urban road from 18.0 metres to 16.5 metres. b) Project Description: The applicant proposes to rezone the property located at 24901 108 Avenue from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit a subdivision of 22 lots, each having a minimum lot size of 557m 2 . The property is located within the Albion Area plan and the proposed development is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. The new local urban road will intersect with 249 Avenue in two locations, and 17 of the future lots will front onto the new road. The proposed subdivision plan is attached as Appendix B. C) Planning Analysis: The applicant is requesting that the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw be varied as follows: Clause 3 of Schedule "B" of the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw to reduce the minimum standard width requirement for a local urban road from 18.0 metres to 16.5 metres. The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed variance request and confirms that all the required services can be provided within the reduced road width of 16.5 metres while still maintaining the required pavement width of 8.6 metres. the applicant has provided a typical cross-section of the -2- proposed road demonstrating a reduction of the boulevard width on each side of the paved portion from 4.7m to 3.9m and 4.Om (Appendix C). The applicant has provided the following rationale for the variance: • The new road will provide access to seventeen RS-lb lots on the development site, therefore reducing the number of access points on 249 Street. The remaining 5 lots will have driveway access from 108 Avenue. • The new crescent shaped road will function as a cul-de-sac road due to its short length and small lot count. The proposed 16.5 metre road width is a median solution between a busier 18 meter wide local through road and a quieter 15 metre cul-de-sac. e) Interdepartmental Implications: The Fire Department anticipates that the proposed road width variance will allow for sufficient turning radius at the corners for large vehicles CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that Council approve Development Variance Permit VP/078/06 to allow the requested variance to the road width from 18.0 metres to 16.5 metres. (.. Prepared by: Ann Edw rds, CPT Plafi Technician P, MCIP Director of Planning Approved by: ,/rank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: ublic Works & D e pment Services Concurrence: J.L./Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AE/ The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject map Appendix B - Proposed Subdivision Plan Appendix C - Typical cross-section for proposed 16.5m wide road. -3- APPENDIXA 'p A RP 16170 P 1363 10941 Rem 14 2 0 19 (I, Rem 16 10921 [SUBJECT PROPERTY I _ 23702 P1363 to Cl 10891 0 P23702 EP33401 A A 27 cc 0 21 108 AVE. 106 AVE. LA RP 17078 P21213 A 24901 108 AVENUE Vir j"1 N District of \_FEj__ 1,1 IMI.APLE RIDGE PLANNtNG DEPARTMENT Langley _____ SCALE 1:2,547 [DATE:Feb9,2007 FILE: VP/078/06 BY: PC 20 PLAN 29987 SLAN tOOt WITNES3. *105054 058585 SOOt NA 3 ROSS RE4159652. BC AD25 001 *111,555 15540 DEVElCPWD0 MAK4M oo24pAlrss 05 *55.855 6ENCHAWRI( UASACEIAENT LTD NC NO, 282784 AUTHORI 2EO5AlCR *1690561 a 9884696 AU5405505 0055511*1 1 1' (9041 I( fl*7 AITNESS AS TO BOTH 56T1 (r - *81645 a ma 21 PLAN 29987 OCCIPOIICSA 05 MTh OHO*5D PUR55JNST TO THE LAND 115.8 ACT 7105 - - - DAT 05 ______ 4455550*058 051T 506 96009544015 05 4*4561 CDIX 1. 8*. II0. A 8859* 5.841*8W 15550 9.M*W€N 05 16 841504 CIXIA(9A 5.9501'S SWAT S WAS 85.51 AT NC POT96SBU.Y 9,P5TTh0ED IC 859.85 PR5TED 95 1100 19,405, AND THAT 1101 90995 5050 LAO 4418 COMMCT. 1140 FBCD 9.9*4(5 8413 96*51152 OS 118 5 DAY 05 T. 5. THE 9840 5640 11055910102 NC 0(055.1. 5550 THE EISEDIUST 50.55 05W 8064?. 054 SHE DAY 05 '. APPENDIX B SUBDIVISION PLAN OF PARCEL "A" (EXPLANATORY PLAN 33401) LOT 14 SEC 11 TP 12 NWD PLAN 1363 B.C.G.S. 92G.028 SCALE 1 750 o to 25 20 lDts ALL THSTANCZS ARE IN tETRED AND OEQ6BALS THEREOF NTEIA1Th 9JRVEY AREA N 38. (A1O4 X 9Sf QMRCT OF I&API THIS P.M 94596 HaIZDSTA OSO-tEllS. OSTANCES EXCEPT FMMI. NAD83 () 0TS*R* #01US. 5. CDPJIt GRID DS7M95. 1681*65 1*0)50-NEWT 9611*5.5 By COMBINED FACT1* 0.9*96425 1*0AN*ES 559 969*55 FROM OBSERVATIONS 9TWDS 965190. 596(95055. 9845307 NC 65550727 IFGENO 17 PLAN 29924 ss 0cSaBP91 50)58 19)5.8 96s105. 4558*9551 • 0 STMSNC 605 POST • 0 LEAOPUJG • AIIJSSINUU POST 18. - PLAN 29987 PROCRESOVE C005TRUCT1C*A LTD., INC.NO. 74269 885539 PLAN BCP 00696102 II DC 61*50 TTTLE 05505. AT 501*84516850102, 88 1)I$__0A505 _________ 26 PLAN 30042 110th AVENUE 'S1 REM 14 - - PLAN 1363 Q 6-I REM 4 PLAN 1363 ol -J B.TA 2 PLAN 84254 N N - ---- 101 5l• LsJ cx C-) -J 0. A PLAN 23702 MAR 213 2007 17 16 15 t-~1 *2 55&2.*? 56a7t2 5 64&9t1 8 6- 57393 29)32 8542 .ç LAJ 59 01 56 TE 56• ROAD iELP,3343T) 14 j '27.5O2 *44l45 . 1.... "' 13 § 19 N 20 I ZN 5382.542 557.2 .2 - 59 61 32 8 N 28842 N 28842 IS'S 22 21 Io BOOTIr 557.2 .2 8 557.1 AS . 30325 N 173912 081586 N8 jr N ROAD idI 9 . 6Ot.T,,,2 59.301 73.5(9 15.231 9 8 4169 .o' .7 P45 44At'45 N 0 (5 / 0 6 5625 542 52.. 5589 *2 6681 *2 N -S ,3t• N 7- 706 N , 1.285 9 8*78 9 3.114 5 567.4 ,*2 553.2 t,1 5282 .52 501.0*29 576.3 tn2 13 <. 9 8 59 II' 5• 9*' Tl' -*5.81! \ 69 01 56 "-ROAD 108th AVENUE --------------------01685. THIS PLAN LIES MTHIN THE GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT - MUNICIPAUTY OF MAPLE RIDGE MiJ4N85EY ASSOQASES LAND 9.461,5.9185 1112. 13160 With 4*91408 819991'. BE VOW 383 19_ 604-596-0381 nIL 2512-07346-02 - ,• 'i t141 JH Oe 4 3 e Co 7N T' C4lL e -' t7. 9-&OC -o rn z D 10-4 Damax Consultants Ltd. 312 750 Terminal Ave Vancouver, B.C. V6A 2M5 17 1 2246827 Fax 689-3880 MAPLE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: September 10, 2007 VP/O75/O5 CoW SUBJECT: Variance Permit Lots 1 - 51, District Lot 263, Plan BCP 30587 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Development Variance Permit application has been made to vary the maximum building height of the RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone from 9.5 metres to 11 metres for Lots 1 - 51, District Lot 263, Plan BCP 30587. This requested variance will apply to all lots in this isolated subdivision and permit homes with improved street appearance than allowed otherwise. Identical variances for height have been granted to other subdivisions in Silver Valley. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal VP/075/05 respecting Lots 1 - 51, District Lot 263, Plan BCP 30587. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Zoning: Existing: DAVENPORT DESIGN ALYCIA HAYES S H 2 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Lot: 1-50, D.L.: 263, Plan: BCP 30587 Urban Residential RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation East: Use: Agricultural RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Agricultural Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Agricultural Single Family Residential 1107 RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential District) Urban Residential GVRD Transportation Authority Property and District of Pitt Meadows Boundary RS-lb (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Lots not less than 561m 2 Davenport Drive, 201 Street, Allison Street Full Urban Not less than 561 m 2 SD/075/05 To increase the maximum building height of the RS- lb zone from 9.5m to urn Zone: Designation West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Lot Size: Previous Applications: Requested Variance: Project Description: The subject properties are part of a newly created subdivision that was approved in June 2007 under subdivision file SD/075/07. The subject property are zoned RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), which permits a NOne Family Residential" use. The applicant has requested a blanket variance over the entire subdivision to vary the maximum height of the RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone from 9.5 metres to 11 metres. The variance will allow for a more appealing and marketable building design. Planning Analysis: Under the RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone, the maximum building height is 9 metres. Varying the maximum building height to 11 metres will allow for a more desirable housing design, which could include 9 foot (2.7 metres) ceilings on the main floor, 8 foot (2.4 metres) ceilings on the second floor, and roof pitches ranging from 6/12 to 8/12 (please see Appendix B for a Design Comparison). It is also recognized that the surrounding neighbourhood is zoned RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential). The maximum height under the RS-3 zone is 11 metres; therefore, the requested variance is consistent with the height requirements of the surrounding area. The subject site is located in a floodplain and the land filling operation originally proposed was opposed by the residents on 125 Street. As a result of their concerns, the Planning Department worked with the developer to reduce the amount of fill on the site, and thus less truck traffic than would otherwise be the case. The solution was to permit unhabitable crawl space for many of the houses in the subdivision and has resulted in the new homes being higher than they would be otherwise. The maximum height of 9.5 metres in the RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) -2- Residential) zone did not anticipate a 1.2 metre to 1.5 metre crawl space. The overall street appearance and house design will improve as a result. CONCLUSIONS: As the variance will allow for an improved building design and is consistent with the building height requirements of the surrounding area, it is recommended that Council approve Development Variance Permit VP/075/05. 66'ung Planning Technician MCIP / / Approved Ly: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.En ' GM: Public orks ev lopment Services C Concurrence: J.II. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer /d p The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Properties Appendix B - Design Comparisons -3- - 0 N 104 13 \ 6\5 B 30587 -10 10— 1 12495 (., Go 14 39 CID 103 '' 12 15 12491 20225 16 38 102 20205 7 37% I 8 36< 12457 'k% 19 5 20 BC 87 34 6 12461 12451 20185 PcI. A 21 0 0 \ 12441 32 12442 4 22 31 46 McWORAVE. 12451 LMP 415 8 12431 12434 23 47 30 1243 12445 I 2430 32 (0 33 in 48 45 12437 12440 C') 12421 12426 24 29 12429 W N Ln 0. co PcLA 2 49 12425 ° 31 C') N 34 12416 BCP 3 587 44 z o 12425 12426128 0. ________ 25 12419 12416 41 12411 28 50 12415 0. 35 1 12408 43 - 30 26 12409 27 12406 12421 12422 51 12405 42 29 36 12411 12402 0 00 P 21483 28 37 PcI. A Rem. 1 12399 12400 19 CL CQ 27 38 0.1 12389 12392 cm 26 - - Co The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge a. makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy status of the information shown on H PcIA j P13328 Nj Disthctof ( PiftMeadows,Jk Lots I - 51, District Lot 263, Plan BCP 30587 CORPORATION OF o I - I THE DISTRICT OF 1%] ThLi vauuai.iei MAPLE RIDGE Disthct of ,.. • . I - _/_.J j I _______________ PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,000 Langley DATE: Sep 11, 2007 FILE: Unified BY: AL N FRONT ELEVATION - LOT 2 Cl Cl Lfl N -* R Ld. Ole 41.11-ftim losms w ci I 0 I 0 IiJ z N -I N U, cm w 'F . "ESROO Of LI <I a- ,- ASPHALT SHINGLES ROOF / SHAKE PROFILE BROWN OR GREY DECORATIVE WOOD GABLE BRACKETS FROM 4 x 4 ,--- I x3 BATTEN / @ 24 O.C. I.c4 OVER 2x 10 BARGE BOARI) 0 I 0 LI I- z N- -I N in i0 N co a, a, a' u-I FRONT ELEVATION - LOT 2 ifti. N- N- U-, -I N -4 0-I c-I U-) c-I -I H Li 0 I- 0 I 0 I-) Li I-:' z DA Ijrr I wr. C JPl LIV/LL I' - L1'JI 4 -* ~z UK I JN a. 1.90 q I I IV fam qt 5 v4m 0 I 0 Li I- z N- N Lfl CD N Li 0 I- m 01 Ln N .-4 DAUrE çO jj L - +1 UrcV i (it fmw 4k",b IPLE RE itish Columbia DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer DATE: September 17, 2007 FILE NO: VP/094/06 ATrN: CoW TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Variance Permit 22990 LOUGHEEDHWY Roll # 5256900006 (LOUGHEED HWY) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Development Variance Permit application VP/094/06 has been received to vary the RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential) zone setback requirement for the townhouse development, and the R-1 (Residential District) zone rear yard setback requirement for five (5) single family lots. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit VP/094/06 be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal VP/094/06 respecting property located at 22990 Lougheed Highway and Roll #5256900006 (Lougheed Highway). DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Pivotal Developments Ltd. Owner: Maple Ridge North Developments Ltd. Legal Description: Parcel "C", DL 402 & 403, Gp 1, NWD, Plan 7104C, NWD except: firstly, Parcel "One" of EPlan 11894; secondly, part shown on highway SR/W Plan 63428; thirdly, part on SR/W Plan 71204; and fourthly, part on Plan 4834, and Parcel "A" (reference plan 3713), DL 402, GP 1, NWD, except: firstly, part (1.090 acres more or less) on SR/W Plan 4834; secondly, part lying north and east of Highway plan 4834; thirdly, part subdivided by plan 10103; fourthly, part within heavy outline on highway SR/W plan 63428; and fifthly, part in plan LMP12216. OCP: Existing: Urban Residential and Conservation Proposed: Urban Residential and Conservation Multi-Family Residential Development Permit Watercourse Protection Development Permit 1108 Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential District), and R-1 (Residential District) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Secondary School Zone: CD-1-89 Designation School South: Use: Townhouse Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-i. (Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Townhouse, Single Family Residential Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and R-1 (Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential, Farm Proposed Use of Property: Townhouse and Single Family Residential Site Area: 3.558 HA Access: Telosky Avenue Servicing: Full Urban Companion Applications: RZ/094/06, SD/094/06, DP/094/06 and DP/012/07 Requested Variances: To reduce the front, rear and interior side setback requirements for the townhouse development, and to reduce the rear setback requirement for the single family lots. b) Project Description: Application RZ/094/06 proposes to rezone 2 properties located at 22990 Lougheed Highway from RS- 3 (One Family Rural Residential), and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential) and R-1 (Residential District). The applicant is proposing to construct 73 townhouse units in 19 wood frame 21/2 storey buildings on the portion of the site north of Telosky Avenue, and provide for a future subdivision of 5 single family R-1 (Residential District) lots on the south side of Telosky Avenue. The balance of the property, approximately 1.57 hectares (42% of the site), will be dedicated as Park. The townhouse development will be accessed from a central driveway on Telosky Avenue that leads to a crescent' of four buildings grouped around a landscaped area containing a mailbox kiosk. The internal road continues uphill to access east and west buildings and buildings fronting onto the Lougheed Highway. The applicant will be constructing Telosky Avenue through the site, connecting the IWM existing Telosky Avenue road right-of-ways to the east and west. The headwaters of Roslyn Creek drain south from Telosky Avenue and proposed compensation works by the applicant for relocation of a pond will include revitalization and rehabilitation of the park area between the top-of-bank and the single family lots. C) Planning Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for residential development, and a Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. Such flexibility can allow an applicant to sensitively fit a project to a site. While the proposed development may not meet all the provisions of the bylaw, it meets the intent for thoughtfully designing buildings to suit the site. Requested Variances to the District of MaDle Ridge Zoning Bylaw: The applicant is requesting that Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw be varied as follows: Part 6, Section 603 (6) (a) of the RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential) zone in the Zoning Bylaw to reduce the required setback from 7.5 metres to 5.0 metres from the front lot line and 4.6 metres on the rear and inside lot lines for the proposed townhouse site. The requested variances on the north, east and west sides of the site generally occur where the buildings are sited at an angle to the property lines resulting in one corner of a building will project into the setback area. This allows for more flexibility in building location and protection of the privacy of the existing residential developments to the east and west of this proposed development. Each of the duplex buildings on the south side of the site, fronting onto Telosky Avenue, will be setback not less than 5.0 metres from the front lot line. This will bring the main living areas of the homes closer to the street and will provide and enhanced pedestrian streetscape on the Telosky Avenue frontage. A Site plan for the townhouse development is attached as Appendix B. Part 6, Section 601 C. (11) (C) (ii) of the R-1 (Residential District) zone of the Zoning Bylaw to reduce the rear yard setback from 8 metres to 6 metres for the five single family lots. The requested variance is to reduce the rear yard setback from 8 metres to 6 metres for the five single family lots on the south side of Telosky Avenue. These 5 lots back onto land that will be dedicated as Park for the protection of the Roslynn Creek watercourse area. The applicant will be dedicating a significant portion of the development site (42%) as Park and will be providing restoration and enhancement works within the Park area between the rear of the single family lots and the top of the slope. Telosky Avenue will be dedicated to an Urban Collector standard width of 20 metres in support of this development, which requires the dedication of an additional 2 metres to road and the provision of a full boulevard width along the sought side of Telosky Avenue for a utility company corridor and full municipal services. A Subdivision plan is attached as Appendix C. -3- d) Alternatives: If this application is not approved the applicant will have to re-evaluate the development and explore ways to meet the bylaw and consider what compromises would be feasible. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that Development Variance Permit VP/094/06 be approved. Planning Technician !!775,W.\ kefihi'MCP, M C I P 6et&of Planning Approved by: Fnk Quinn, MBA, P.En GM: Public Works & D el ment Services Concurrence: J.L/(Jim) Rule Cef Administrative Officer AE/ The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Site Plan for townhouses Appendix C - Subdivision plan -4- APPENDIX A APPENDIX B 'A 3 10 9 8/ APPENDIX C Survey P/on to Accompany Rezoning O - Parcel C (Plan With Charge Deposited 7104C) DL 402 & 403 Cp 1 Except: Firstly. Parcel One (Explanatory P/on 11894) Secondly. Part Within Heavy Outline Token By Highway SRW P/on 63428 Thirdly. Port On Statutory Right Of Way P/on 71204 Fourth/y, Port On Plan 4834 New Westminster District And Parcel A (Reference P/on 3713) DL 402 Co I Except: Firstly. Part (1.090 Acres More Or Less) Shos.n Outlined Red On Statutory Right Of Way P/on 4834 Secondly Part Ly,ng North And East Of The Highway P/on 4834 Thirdly. Port Subdivided By Plan 10103 Fourth/y. Part Within Heavy Outline Token By Highway 511W P/on 63428 Fifthly. Part In P/on LMP12216 SC.iLtl 70 LEW0. 5 Cw — fJ \ . A \ Area A 44-4 27?( 6 7 /12 - 77166.6 o2 IC 9 R-I2 • 2 ,. • 22 3 __• 7. 21 17 Area B Conservation Pork Area - 75744.0 0,2 15 15 14 12 11 10 9 8 7 13 NW5261 7 12 - MAPLE RIDGE -. British Columbia DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer DATE: September 18, 2007 FILE NO: VP/029/05 ATIN: CoW FROM: SUBJECT: Variance Permit 23701 KANAKA WAY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A variance application has been made in support of a subdivision to vary the off-site servicing requirements for an unopened, unconstructed portion of 112th Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal VP/029/05 respecting property located at 23701 KANAKA WAY. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Damax Consultants David Laird Owner: Donada Industries Ltd, Medowland Industries Ltd, Lawrence Shumyla Construction Ltd, Deyor Farms Ltd Legal Description: Lot: A, D.L.: 404, Plan: LMP47845 Existing: Urban Residential, Conservation Zoning: Existing: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Conservation, Urban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: CD-1-93 (Comprehensive Development) Designation: Urban Residential 1109 East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: CD-1-93 (Comprehensive Development) Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Previous Applications: Variance Description Vacant Single Family Residential 3.05 ha (7.5 acres) Kanaka Way, proposed extension of 237 Street Full Urban RZ/029/05, CP/029/05, DP/047/07, DP/029/05 Services on 112th Avenue road right-of-way Project Description: The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject property into 35 (thirty-five) R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) lots and leave one larger lot as a remainder. The subject property is located on Kanaka Way and abuts an unopened, unconstructed 112 11, Avenue road right-of-way to the north. Due to the location of Horseshoe Creek and the topography of the land, it is not likely 112th Avenue would be constructed any further as a creek crossing and severe regrading would be required. As such, it is not required to complete the 112th Avenue road right-of-way. Therefore, a variance is required in respect to waiving the servicing requirements on the 112 Avenue road allowance. Planning Analysis The proposed subdivision will have access from Kanaka Way and from a new internal road and laneway. The subdivision plan does not incorporate the need to have the 112th road allowance constructed. Engineering Department The Engineering Department has reviewed the application and has determined that there is no intention to open up the road allowance. The servicing, therefore, would not be required. CONCLUSIONS: Given the Engineering Department's support and that the proposed subdivision has access from Kanaka Way, it is recommended that VP/029/05 be given favorable consideration. -2- A,11 Prepared by: Jen Ckos : Plarniechnician Apç{r'iedby'Jabç PJpkrigLMP, MCIP Directo¼r&Pl anning APProved Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services II- ce: J.L. (Jjh) Rule Chief Adminis Officer ME The following appendices ar'attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Property Map Appendix B - Subdivision Plan -3- ,1. . •• .lII. _____ 2LMP241 k'2i3t 4"i3 'fij 8CR 12P3? 9CP 12853 678 g.. -,' - film 49360 %\ 18 PAI District of Pitt Meadows ' ...;, .•& ). 1 • •' •' -K :ji .awl 0-& SCALE 1:2,500 District of Langley 23701 KANAKA WAY - j) 7iJ CORPORATION OF oc 2Q THE DISTRICT OF j MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE Thc~hill Incorporated 12. September, 1874 PLANNING DEPARTMENT _____ DATE: Oct 31, 2005 FILE: VP/029/05 BY: PC BUILDING ENVELOPI r1 FOR lOIS 1 TO 35 PLAN RCP_._ I_I 2' 1' • .. / ' .. I I; • ... h . 21 I 23 ' I .p I .111 I •. / 29 I 22 I 21 / s 7 ,o .9 / • - '. •Ia I9 •" • 0 ' , •—: '.*• .• ,g " •?1hd .. Is 1311 •.._. • 2 ' • II " A .4• , I4 . 1A. •._., '' .4 . % -,• • 2 • 5• •• I •.. •,• .4 6 • '• ç.; .0 6 II .... \ / 36/ 7 PARK 32 II do /33. / / L2 I4 PARK 277777 r "p MAPLGE British Columbia DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: FROM SUBJECT: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer ATIN: Variance Permit 10706 248 Street 10754 248 Street September 19, 2007 VP/087/06 CoW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Development Variance Permit application VP/087/06 has been received to vary the R-1 (Residential District) zone rear yard setback requirement for twelve (12) single family lots, and to waive the requirement for the conversion of overhead utility wiring to underground wiring on 248 Street. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit VP/087/06 be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal VP/087/06 respecting properties located at 10706 and 10754 248 Street. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Damax Consultants Ltd. Owners: No. 265 Seabright Holdings Ltd. Dale M. Erskine Legal Description: Rem. Lot B, Sect 11, TP 12, NWD, Plan 21213 Lot A, Section 11, TP 12, NWD, Plan BCP29285 OCP: Existing: Suburban Residential - Schedule B, and Low/Medium Density Residiential, Medium Density Residential, Conservation - Albion Area Plan Proposed: No Change 1110 Surrounding Uses North: South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Zoning: Existing: A-2 (Upland Agricultural), RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: R-1 (Residential District), RS-lb (One Family Urban (medium desnity) Residential and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Requested Variance: Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Institutional & Medium Density Residential - Albion Area Plan Vacant A-2 (Upland Agricultural) & RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Medium Density Residential - Albion Area Plan Residential A-2 (Upland Agricultural), RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Suburban Residential - Schedule B Residential RS-lb (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) Low/Medium Density & Conservation - Albion Area Plan Residential Residential 14.7 hectares 248 Street To be provided at subdivision RZ/015/06, SD/015/06, SD/087/06, DP/087/06, To reduce the rear setback requirement for 12 single family lots, and to waive the requirement for underground wiring on 248 Street. b) Project Description: Application RZ/087/06 proposes to rezone 3 properties located at 10706 and 10754 248 Street and 24892 108 Avenue from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1 (Residential District), RS-lb (One Family Urban (medium desnity) Residential and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). The remainder of the site will be designated as Park (more than 60%). While the majority of the site is within the urban boundary, a portion of it is outside the area designated urban residential. The site is impacted by Thornvale Creek and a tributary to Thornvale Creek which runs from the southeast to the northwest property creating two separate development modules, a North and a South Development Module with a total of 79 lots. -2- Subdivision application SD/015/06 was approved in February 2007 to separate the Erskine home site from the larger parcel. Subdivision application SD/087/06 is nearing completion for the north and south development modules. The Subdivision Plan is attached as Appendix B. A Watercourse Protection Development Permit application DP/087/06 has been received for the protection of the environmentally sensitive areas of the development. C) Planning Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for residential development, and a Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. Such flexibility can allow an applicant to sensitively fit a project to a site. While the proposed development may not meet all the provisions of the bylaw, it meets the intent for thoughtfully designing buildings to suit the site. Requested Variance to the District of Maøle Ridge Zoning Bylaw: The applicant is requesting that Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw be varied as follows: 1. Part 6, Section 601 C. (ii) (C) (ii) of the R-i. (Residential District) zone of the Zoning Bylaw to reduce the rear yard setback from 8 metres to 6 metres for the twelve single family lots. The requested variance is to reduce the rear yard setback from 8 metres to 6 metres for twelve single family lots in the South Development Module. These lots back onto land that will be dedicated as Park for the protection of the Thornvale Creek watercourse area. The applicant will be dedicating a significant portion of the development site (more than 60%) as Park and will be providing restoration and enhancement works at specific locations within the Park area. A Location plan is attached as Appendix C that highlights the location of the 12 lots with a typical building envelope sketch. The applicant is requesting that the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw be varied as follows: 1. Schedule A - Services and Utilities: to waive the requirement for underground wiring on 248 Street. The recommendation to waive this servicing requirement is supported in Council Policy 9.05 "Conversion of Existing Overhead Utility Wiring to Underground Wiring". A copy of Council's policy is attached as Appendix D. e) Engineering Department comments: A Development Variance Permit is required to support retention of the above-ground utility company plant on the east side of 248 Street. This will also include the retention of the above ground utility company service connections to the Erskine's house at 10754 248 Street considering that the house will be removed with a future subdivision. Council policy is to support such variances. SIE Prepared by: Ann Edwards, C Plafi-n-mg Technician CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that Development Variance Permit VP/087/06 be approved. 41ZdL- Approved b/ Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services -4- The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Subdivison Plan Appendix C - Location Plan and typical building envelope sketch Appendix C - Council Policy 9.05 for Underground wiring. -5- APPENDIX A SUBJECT PROPERTIES Mn Distnct of Langley 10706 & 10754 248 STREET 4 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20, 2007 FILE: VP1087106 PS, : DI I, .12 P753 I /2 II I/I TI P IJt fliT I 7/201 PAl i/i 3m PP P.72 T 1171W 27/201 1/2 P/A Sli II P.!! WT Ill DIII APPENDIX B SUBDIVISION PLAN OF LOT B, EXCEPT LOT A, PLAN BCP. PLAN BCS_________ SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 12, N.W.D., PLAN 21213 SCALt - IO -EJ : S II m Sc APPENDXC I 21 PU.A AJ I 81136O 108 AVE$UE MW 46 1' 'tP) Ik 104 -- Ill ra 'I III N _ ts 0 EMM WIJtT PLNIZI2I.2 I Nf/2ofElfl Iw 114 SEC it rniz 'I MW7N?W SECTION 11 TOWNEMIP 12 Ce t" ço- Li4' 1'T +DN t\ V'Ac*p d*ro \v1¼L) pm. OF N 1/2 of SE 1/4 N II to 106th AVENUE I $I/Et/ I R't/410C1fW.12 C I Damax Consultants Ltd. 312 -750 Terminal Ave Vancouver, B.C. V6A 2M5 tel. 224.6827 Fax 689-3880 4w '2Io'1- 1: to I • I c2dr*Is'¼_ -- - I I I NkIi-. Dam ax Consultants Ltd. 312 - 750 Terminal Ave Vancouver, B.C.V6A 2M5 tel. 2248827 Fax 689.3880 c7A' I' APPENDIXD MAPLE RiDGE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE 1ucoipoted 12 Sentcnr. 1874 TITLE: CONVERSION OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY WIRING TO UNDERGROUND WIRING POLICY NO. 9.05 APPROVAL DATE: July 23, 1996 POLICY STATEMENT: Council will support development variance permit applications to waive the requirement of Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 4800-1993 as amended, to provide underground wiring on highway right of ways serviced by existing overhead utility systems, where the abutting road is required to be upgraded to an urban standard, on the following conditions: The existing overhead utility system is shown on the attached plan, or 2. There is less than a total of 250 metres of contiguous redevelopment potential fronting both sides of the highway right of way designated on the Official Community Plan. Further, in those cases where undergrounding of existing overhead utility lines is required, and a development has less than 250 metres of frontage on the highway right of way, the developer will service his development with underground dips off the overhead line and deposit with the Municipality sufficient funds to achieve the required undergrounding in the future. Date Printed: 2006-05-10 Page 1 of 1 Policy 9.05 •.jii 1IsIe DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: September 20, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: VP/075/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: CoW SUBJECT: Variance Permit 10316 240 STREET 10346 240 STREET EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Development Variance Permit application VP/075/07 has been received to waive the requirement for the conversion of overhead utility wiring to underground wiring on 240 Street. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit VP/075/07 be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal VP/075/07 respecting properties located at 10316 and 10346 240 Street. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: . D.K Bowins and Associates Inc. Owners: RIAJ K ARORA VIJAY K ARORA TAJ MAHAL HOLDINGS LTD Legal Description: Lot 2, Section 3, TP 12,.NWD Plan 8149 Lot "C", Section 3, TP 12, NWD Plan 20434 OCP: Existing: Medium Density Residential and Conservation Proposed: Medium Density Residential and Conservation Zoning: Existing: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) 1111 Surrounding Uses North: South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Previous Applications: Requested Variance: Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Medium Density Residential Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Medium Density Residential and Conservation Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Medium Density Residential and Conservation Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Urban Residential Residential Residential, Park 2.763 hectares 240 Street To be provided at the time of subdivision RZ/093/04, SD/093/04, DP/075/07 To waive the requirement for underground wiring on 240 Street. b) Project Description: Rezoning Application RZ/093/04 is to rezone the western portion, approximately 1.15 hectares, to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) to permit the future subdivision into 18 lots. The R-3 zone requires an Intensive Residential Development Permit for the form and character of the proposed homes. The eastern portion of the site will redevelop in the future as a townhouse site. Spencer Creek crosses through the southeast corner of the development site. Park dedication for protection of the watercourse area will be acquired with the Rezoning application. This Development Variance Permit application VP/075/07 is to waive the requirement for the conversion of the existing overhead utility wiring to underground wiring on 240 Street. C) Planning Analysis: The applicant is requesting that the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw be varied as follows: 1. Schedule A - Services and Utilities: to waive the requirement for underground wiring on 240 Street. The recommendation to waive this servicing requirement is supported in Council Policy 9.05 "Conversion of Existing Overhead Utility Wiring to Underground Wiring". A copy of Council's policy is attached as Appendix D. -2- d) Engineering Department comments: A Development Variance Permit is required to support retention of the above-ground utility company plant on the east side of 240 Street. Council policy is to support such variances. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that Development Variance Permit VP/075/07 be approved. Prepared by: Ann Edwards, CPT Planning Technician (~A p7p r e P1T.IMCP, MCIP Director of Planning xy~a c Approved b/ Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services Concu/rence: Al. (Jim) RUle / / Chief Adrdinistrtive Officer AE/ The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Subdivision Plan Appendix C - Council Policy 9.05 for Underground wiring. -3- 19458 14750 P14750 A Rem7 8 10420 APPENDIX A EW 01 U, 02 02 0 0. a. w PcLM (J130089E) PcI. 1 PP 9100 15351 2 104 AVE. Rernjii__ P176 P9393 P2(1434 A P13554 G P20434 Subject Properties BCP 010 LMP 480 PARK PARK 2 10337 irrio 1810291 19 ( R m i e 45 M 5157 ____ 1795 T4~42 4j3f635 41 40 39 38 fbr31lZ 10294 10309 28 ______________________ 102 BAVE. 7992 (829 10270 11l.l.l... 2122212425262721213131373635I34 33 321 l 1313029287 1 2 PARK 0210267 1_ItU4P 177 1111 C3lpj__) 1 I - 242526 2 17ft 2023 L1iTh 48057 10250 102AAVE. IO2AAVE. 3 10273 N75o14 02 9 91.1? 2625124123221212019181 98765 10222 P"9249 LMP48057 '1 ( LMP148057 IBdP3139 'I r BCP3I3d 2 3 I 5 6 7181911011121314151617] 1 - _2 3 Distnctof PittMeadows C' ( 1L 10316&10346-24 0 St CORPORATION OF t! ( I I THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Albion District of \<. '•- j PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley -Kf nm DATE: Sep 20, 2007 DP1075107 BY: JV N SCALE 1:2,500 Ii 2 3 415I1 71819 101115114[13112 11 iol - - _r - P I ti'äI$C lIlOOld SWCDNYA 1IV1VD ]H W11i $71 IWW SMI z w 0 0 Sic- iQL1cI e NYld ZflNZAV H.LOI g.o oLyo k np.J S$N S 011101 00 1111.11 I awm IOO6 IO8 joldisla N3ISNIY4JS3M M3N I dIHSNMOI t N011335 dO H109 •6pIN N1d 101 ONY P€PO5 NYId .9.101 dO NY1d NOISIAIO8flS APPENDIX C Ry CORPORATION OF THE DISi iui. i or IVIAI'LL KLIRiE MAPLE Incorporated 12 Senictoher. 1874 TITLE: CONVERSION OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY WIRING TO UNDERGROUND WIRING POLICY NO. 9.05 APPROVAL DATE: July 23, 1996 POLICY STATEMENT: Council will support development variance permit applications to waive the requirement of Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw 4800-1993 as amended, to provide underground wiring on highway right of ways serviced by existing overhead utility systems, where the abutting road is required to be upgraded to an urban standard, on the following conditions: The existing overhead utility system is shown on the attached plan, or 2. There is less than a total of 250 metres of coniiguous redevelopment potential fronting both sides of the highway right of way designated on the Official Community Plan. Further, in those cases where undergrounding of existing overhead utility lines is required, and a development has less than 250 metres of frontage on the highway right of way, the developer will service his development with underground dips off the overhead line and deposit with the Municipality sufficient funds to achieve the required undergrounding in the future. Date Printed: 2006-05-10 Page 1 of 1 Policy 9.05 PMALE RIDGE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer 5% Money in lieu of parkland dedication (23267 Silver Valley RD, 13750 232 SD TO: FROM SUBJECT: DATE: September 19, 2007 FILE NO: SD/090/06 ATFN: C of W EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The above noted subdivision is subject the provisions of the Local Government Act regarding parkland dedication or payment of money in lieu. It is recommended that Council require money in lieu of parkland dedication for properties located at 23267 Silver Valley Road and 13750 232 Street. RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Council's policy regarding 5% Parkland Dedication or payment of money in lieu, be it resolved that the owner of land proposed for subdivision at 23267 Silver Valley Road and 13750 232 Street, under application SD/090/06, shall pay to the District of Maple Ridge an amount that is not less than $49,800.00. DISCUSSION: Section 941 of the Local Government Act states that (1) An owner of land being subdivided must, at the owner's option, Provide, without compensation, park land of an amount and in a location acceptable to the local government, or Pay to the municipality or regional district an amount that equals the market value of the land that may be required for park land purposes under this section determined under subsection (6). Under Section 941(2) of the Local Government Act, Council is given the option of whether.they would like the applicant to exercise option (1)(a) or (1)(b) of the Local Government Act. Section 941 (2) states 1112 (2) Despite subsection (1), if an official community plan contains policies and designations respecting the location and type of future parks, the local government may determine whether the owner must provide land under subsection (1)(a) or money under subsection (1)(b). Where there is a significant watercourse and the District has the ability to include ravines and watercourse protection areas into the public realm, that area is dedicated Park. These areas provide for large vegetated areas in urban neighbourhoods that provide corridors for wildlife and passive park areas for residents. Where there is either no watercourse or the watercourse is deemed insignificant, 5% of the market value of the land is paid to the District. These funds are placed into a special Parkland Acquisition Reserve Fund, which enables the District to purchase areas deemed important for habitat protection but where the ability to achieve parkland through development is limited, such as the Blaney Bog. In this particular instance there is no watercourse present however some 'open space" is identified in figure 3A Blaney Hamlet in Silver Valley Area Plan section of the Official Community Plan. The developer has supplied a walkway as dedicated park to satisfy the open space criteria however the amount of parktand dedicated does not meet 5% of the total land area it is, therefore, recommended that money in lieu of parkland dedication be provided to make up the difference in percentages. The size of the subject property is 2.49 hectares (6.162 acres) of land, of with 5% required parkiand dedication calculates into 1246.84 m 2. The amount of park dedication received from the walkway is 832.5m' (3.34%). To meet the required 5%dedication, the District will require an additional 1.66% cash in lieu. In keeping with past practice, the District has requested that an appraisal be provided for the 5% market value of the development site. This appraisal is based on zoned but not serviced land. An opinion from an appraisal firm has stated that the market value of the land is $3,000,000, which indicates that 1.66% value of this property is $49,800.00 CONCLUSION: As there are no watercourses on the property it is recommended that Council require money in lieu of parkiand dedication as prescribed in the appraisal. -2- Prepared by Jen tsikos Planning Technician roved nt!11rT4CP, MCIP Director of Planning Approved by:/Frank Quinn MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Deyinent Services Concurrence: J. L.,Jim) Rule Chi€f Administrative Officer /dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix 1 - Subject Property Map Appendix 2 - Subdivision Plan -3- Vf Distñctof - Pitt Meadows -: (13750 232 STREET & siWorval 23267 SILVER VALLEY ROAD Mh CORPORATION OF LI DIsTPJcT OF Alb N District of i IIVEAPLE RTDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:3,000 Langley ____ DATE: Dec 5, 2006 FILE: DP/090106 BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE __ DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: September 19, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: SD/033/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATrN: C of W SUBJECT: Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Amending Bylaw No. 6479-2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This report addresses the updates required for the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 4800 - 1993. These updates will Ensure that the bylaw references the current and applicable Provincial Acts and municipal bylaws; and Ensure that all zones are subject to servicing requirements. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 6479 - 2007 be read a first, second, and third time. BACKGROUND: The Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing By-law No. 4800 - 1993 was adopted November 15, 1993. The purpose of the bylaw was to give the District the authority to regulate subdivision and development of land. After careful review, staff have identified areas of the bylaw that require updates. These amendments ensure that new subdivision and development proposals meet the required servicing standards. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The following are the proposed amendments to the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing By-law No. 4800 - 1993. Paragraph 1 will refer to the current Local Government Act rather than the Municipal Act. Under Section I, Part B Definitions, the definition of Approval" will be amended by replacing "Director of Inspection Services" with "Chief Building Official". Therefore, the definition of 1113 ApprovaI" will now mean the written approval of a subdivision by the Approving Officer or the issuance of a building permit by the Chief Building Official The definition of Chief Building Official will be added to Section I, Part B Definitions of the bylaw and will mean the Manager of Inspection Services and/or the Director of Licenses, Permits, and Bylaws. Under Section II, Part B, Clause 2(b)(xiv) will be deleted. This section states that subdivision plans should include The Development Permit Area boundary if applicable". As the District's Development Permit Areas are not defined by a boundary on a map, this clause is not longer relevant. Under Section III, Part B Basic Provisions, Clause 6 will refer to the current Strata Properties Act rather than the Condominium Act. Addition of the R-3, RST, CRM, RM-6, CS-5, and P-4a zones will be made to Schedule A and will include their respective servicing requirements as shown in the attached Schedule A. CONCLUSION: As these updates are necessary to ensure that new subdivision and development proposals are adequately serviced, it is recommended that Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 6479 - 2007 be read a first, second, and third time. arej oe AdinaLeu Planning Technician vey( a erin MCIP J Approved by: r'rank Quinn, P.Eng.,P ç l: Pu7ie-works.9i velopment Services I Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule /Chief Administrative Officer / I The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Amending Bylaw No. 6479 . 2007 Appendix B - Amended Schedule A and Schedule B -2- CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6479 - 2007 A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing By-law No. 4800 - 1993 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing By-law No. 4800 - 1993 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Amending Bylaw No. 6479 - 2007." Schedule "A" is hereby replaced with Schedule "A" attached hereto. Paragraph 1 is hereby amended by removing the words 'Municipal Act" and inserting the words "Local Government Act" in their place. Section I General, Part B Definitions shall be amended by removing the words "Director of Inspection Services" and inserting the words 'Chief Building Official" in their place. Section I General, Part B Definitions shall be amended by the addition of the following: "Chief Building Official - means the Manager of Inspection Services and/or the Director of Business Licensing, Permits, and Bylaws." Section II, Part B, Clause 2(b)(xiv) will be removed. Section III Basic Provisions, Clause 6 is hereby amended by removing the words "Condominium Act" and inserting "Strata Properties Act" in their place. Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing By-law No. 4800 - 1993 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 2007. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 2007. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 2007. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of A.D. 2007. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER • SChEDULE "A" SERVICES AND UTILITIES All parcels within a proposed subdivision or development shall be provided with services in accordance herewith and all highways within, or immediately adjacent to a proposed subdivision or development shall be constructed in accordance herewith. 5595/97 ZONE STREETS SERVICES LANES (See Note 5) A-I SD A TB A-2 SD A TB A-3 SD A TB A-4 SD A TB A-5 SD A TB R-I - Note 3 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A R-3 - Note 3 ST W SS SD A C 15W BT SW SL TB A RS-I - Note 3 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A RS-Ia - Note 3 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A RS-Ib - Note 3 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A RS-Ic - Note 3 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A RS-Id - Note 3 & 4 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A RS-2 W SD A BT SL TB A RS-3 - Note I W SD A BT SL TB A SRS - Note 3 ST W SS SD A C 15W BT SW SL TB A RE ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A RST ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A RT-I ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A RG ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A RG-2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A RG-3 ST SD A C 15W BT SW SL TB A RMH ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A RM-I ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A RM-2 ST W SS S D A C UW BT SW SL TB A RM-3 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL •TB A RM-4 ST W SS SD A C 15W BT SW SL TB A RM-5 ST W SS SD A C 15W BT SW SL TB A RM-6 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL • TB A C-I ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A C-2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A C-3 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A C-4 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A C-4a ST SD A SL TB C-5 ST W SS SD A C 15W BT SW SL TB A H-I ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CRM ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CS -1 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C 15W BT SW SL TB A CS-2 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CS-2a - Note 2 ST W SS SD A UW BT SL TB A CS-3 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C 15W BT SW SL TB A CS-4 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C TB A CS-5 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-2-85 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-I-86 ST W SS SD A C IJW BT SW SL TB A CD-I-87 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-2-87 - Note I W SD A BT SL TB A CD-3-87 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-2-88 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-3-88 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-4-88 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-5-88 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-6-88 ST W SS SD A C TJW BT SW SL TB A CD-1-89 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-2-90 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-3-90 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-5-90 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-I-92 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-2-92 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-3-92 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-I-93 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-2-93 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A CD-3-93 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A M-I - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A M-2 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A M-3 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A M-4 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A M-5 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A P-I - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A P-2 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A P-3 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A P-4 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A P-4a - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A P-5 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C UW BT SW SL TB A P-6 - Note 2 ST W SS SD A C IJW BT SW SL TB A LEGEND W Water Distribution System SS Sanitary Sewer SD Storm Drainage System A Asphalt C Curbs and Gutters UW Underground Wiring BT Boulevard Treatment SW Sidewalks SL Street Lighting TB Transit Bays ST Street Tree Planting Note 1 Parcels of at least 2.0 ha. in area located in the RS-3 zone may be exempted from the requirements to provide a water distribution system. - Note 2 Subdivisions and development in the P-I, P-2, P-3, P-4, P-4a, P-5, P-6, CS-i, CS-2, CS-2a, CS-3, CS-4, CS-5, M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4, M-5 and CD-4-88 zones which are located in the rural area as designated on the Official Community Plan may be exempted from the -2- requirement to provide sanitary sewer systems, underground wiring, boulevard treatment, street tree planting, sidewalks, curbs, and/or street lighting. Note 3 Parcels created abutting highway rights-of-way serviceable by an existing above ground utility system fronting such parcels (B.C. Hydro and Power Authority and B.C. Telephone Co.) may be exempted from the requirement to provide underground wiring. This exemption shall not apply when road upgrading of the fronting street to an urban standard is undertaken as part of the subdivision. 5 195-94 Note 4 Subdivisions in the RS-ld zone may be exempted from some of the servicing requirements, provided it is subject to a comprehensive design scheme. 5595-97 Note 5 Parcels abutting highway rights-of-way serviced by an existing above ground utility system fronting such parcels (B.C. Hydro and Power Authority, B.C. Telephone Co. and CATV) are exempted from the requirement to provide underground wiring on the abutting highway, provided that the parcel is located within the area identified as the Existing Urban Area as shown on the attached map labeled Schedule "D". -3- Irju;ii,iej District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: 1 His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: September 24, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: E02-036-006 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Maple Ridge Transit Shelter Agreement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The District, through agreement with Pattison Outdoor Advertising, provides transit shelters at mutually agreed to transit locations. Under the agreement, Pattison Outdoor Advertising installs and maintains transit shelters at theses locations. The current agreement with Pattison Outdoor Advertising expired at the end of April 2007 and has been held over. In the interim, the District's Purchasing Department examined the marketplace for suitable suppliers and recommend that an extension to the contract be made. Council approval to negotiate an extension is requested. RECOMMENDATION: THAT staff be directed to negotiate an extension to the Maple Ridge Transit Shelter Agreement between the District of Maple Ridge and Pattison Outdoor Advertising and that the extension include adjustments to the DistricVs revenue. DISCUSSION: Background Context: Pattison Outdoor Advertising has supplied, installed and maintained Transit Shelters for Maple Ridge under a fee for service agreement from 2002 to 2007. The current agreement expired at the end of April 2007. A new agreement is required if the transit shelter services are to continue. Desired Outcome: This report seeks Council's direction to negotiate and award a new agreement to Pattison Outdoor Advertising for continued service. C) Strategic Alignment: The Corporate Strategic Plan directs that the District will provide high quality municipal services to our citizens and customers in a cost effective and efficient manner. The District's agreement with Pattison Outdoor Advertising is will provide a high quality service to residents of Maple Ridge. 1114 d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The District, under agreement, permits Pattison Outdoor Advertising to provide transit shelters at bus stops for Maple Ridge residents. These shelters provide a level of protection from the elements for Maple Ridge bus patrons. Pattison Outdoor Advertising is charged a fee for the exclusive rights to supply, install and maintain transit shelters for Maple Ridge. Pattison is able to pay for these fees through advertising revenue from the shelter. Interdepartmental Implications: The current agreement involves a number of different departments including the Engineering, Communications and Clerks Departments. Business Plan / Financial Implications: Pattison Outdoor Advertising is charged a fee for the exclusive rights to supply, install and maintain transit shelters for Maple Ridge. Pattison is able to pay for these fees through advertising revenue from the shelter. Alternatives: The District has operated the current arrangement as a partnership for many years. Levels of service are annually reviewed through the Business Planning process by staff and Council. Purchasing staff have researched the marketplace and there are no experienced firms other than Pattison Outdoor Advertising interested in this contract. CONCLUSION: The District provides transit shelter services to residents of Maple Ridge through a contract with Paterson Outdoor Advertising to supply, install and maintain transit shelters. The current contract has expired and a new agreement is required to continue the services for District residents. Submitted by: Jndrew Wood, PhD., PEng. Submitted by: Earl Oddstad Municipal Engineer Manager of Procurement -7a ~9 Approve,Øy: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. GM: Public Works and Development Services Concurfence: J.L. (Jirn)Rule Chief ministrative Officer Aw/m/ District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: September 21, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: CofW SUBJECT: 26th Annual Haney-Harrison Road Relay EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: BC Road Running is requesting permission to use municipal streets for the 26th Annual Haney- Harrison Road Relay on Saturday, November 3, 2007. A map showing the run routes is attached. Authorization from Council is required to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge. Road closures are not anticipated for this event. RECOMMENDATION: THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the 26th Annual Haney-Harrison Road Relay on Saturday, November 3, 2007, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule 'A' attached to the staff report dated September 21, 2007 are met. DISCUSSION: Background Context From time to time the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability for injury or damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as "Schedule A." The Haney-Harrison Road Relay begins at 6:30 AM on Brown Avenue at 224 Street. Participants will travel north on 224 Street to 132 Avenue, head east on 132 Avenue to 232 Street, travel south on 232 Street to Dewdney Trunk Road. Participants will continue to travel east on Dewdney Trunk Road towards Mission and beyond, and will finish in Harrison. Strategic Plan: Permitting of Maple Ridge street events promotes community development and often highlights Maple Ridge's natural and built features. C) Citizen/Customer Implications: This event does not require road closures, however, permission to use municipal streets may cause some delays and inconveniences to other road users. Traffic control will be provided by the event organizers. 1115 Interdepartmental Implications: The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP, for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service). Business Plan/Financial Implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices. ) Alternatives: The District could refuse to permit the run to occur. In this event, the organizer would have to cancel the run or arrange for alternatives. CONCLUSIONS: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events and activities. The Haney-Harrison Road Relay was held in Maple Ridge last year without incident. J~l Submitted by: Andrew Wood, PhD., PEng. Municipal Engineer Approved bl Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. / GM: Public Works & Development Services ce: J.L. (Jim) Rulie / Chief Administrétive Officer AW/mi Schedule 'A' To Council Memorandum Dated September 21, 2007 26th Haney-Harrison Road Relay Condition of Approval Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers: provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the R.C.M.P., and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District); notify local Fire Department, and Ambulance Services of the event; make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; obtain any required permits from the District of Maple Ridge Parks and Leisure Services Department for park facility use; obtain any required permits from the Ministry of Transportation for use of Highways and facilities; notify the District of Mission and obtain any required permits or permission for facility use; make arrangements for all surrounding businesses and residents for access purposes during the event; advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of the' event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date); must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any way connected with the event; 11.obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have 'the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District." Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; and 12.refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the District. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw permission to use municipal streets for this and future events should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements. Chief Administrative Officer BCAPA ½I THLETICS August 20, 2007 Mr. Terry Fryer District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge. BC V2X 6A9 Track and FieLd Road Running P -'rTMart,fons/U(tras qss CountiyRtmning Race WaLking -rç •j- Re: 26th Annual Haney-Harrison Road Relay: November 3, 20O7 ---- To whom it may concern: Once again BC Road Running a Division of BC Athletics requests approval for a portion of the day on November 3, 2007 for the purpose of running the 26th Annual Haney-Harrison Road Relay. This event is sanctioned by BC Road Running a Division of BC Athletics and accordingly Insurance is being arranged through Sport BC. All Villages, Corporations, Private Property, Districts and the Ministry of Transportation & Highways will be named as co-insured on the policy. Permits may be faxed to: B.C. Athletics 604-737-3171 Event web site: www.bcath1etics.org/H2H/ Should there be any aspect you wish to discuss, please contact me at the number below. Yours truly, A I Miranda Reece Race Director Miranda(reflexionclinics.com 604-317-0864 Fax: 604-737-3171 206— 1367 W. Broadway Vancouver, BC, V6H 4A9 Th,s orgaruzatlon is supported by: 1367 W. Broadway, Suite 206, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6H 4A9 AMEMBER Itkr\CH III- - I Ministrof Tel: 604-737-3170 E-mail: bcathleticsbcathLetics.org Athletics Canada. ttltmsH I Tourtsrn Sport A 41 Athlótisme Canada COLUMBIA and theArrs Fax: 604-737-3171 Website: www.bcathletics.org Le I = 9.41 km Exchange #1 at light pole —4. s/Isctmotl - W 1 nink Road In the parking lot of Garibaldi Secondary School at the light standard tdgc of pavenoctot S 'Exchange #2 )aii; Dcwncd Trunk Road Al east edge of pavement opposite the lorest Leg 2 = 13.51 km l)istriet sign / ... I /I Sl • Dani tcwdi;ev irook Rood ad lh ( A 1 ionS I L__ Leg #5 = 13.12 km toog dtlwy xchange #5 21w lovghecd Itwy Athey Rood N. 2 Sign On Athey No2 Road. 2.Im past the 41h pole from the corner and 21 4m from the "No Through Road" sign at Lougheed. I3rown Road —1 r Start exactly in front of main entrance to the Legion Residence at 12127-224th Street - under Legion crest at centre of door Li Lee 3 = 15,112 , Dewnedy l'runk Road- Exchange #3 Located in centre of parking area of 8635 Stave Lake Street - 14 m east of drain grate Harrison Relay / U! Run Canada Certification BC-2006--BI)C Lee 8 = 8.03 km Excltangc #4 Leg 4 = 14.42 km At the entrance to t)cv;tncy Elementary Schiioil, in line with the north; edge of the pavement it ttawkiu,s Pickle Road and 2.6in Sun; the tt( (Sis valve M uked with;; yellow survey disk Esplavade Ave FINISH ii- Menuo;cdU 11 ;III t.Illouul All .. I I Dcwdncy ticmcuulary School °u. cy :h=h1 •1g, 1 ttnwkiogo l'ickle Rd Finish is On Maple Street in lute with the far curb to the parking area. l.illnuel ou I (Intl Rood o ........... 1 E . Mc(nllnm Ro cdttglw yHI 2 P-COd Niconuen ibid brook Rood Exchange #7 Leg m 7 = 13.31 k \\ 1 McCaltum Road • Fttitrance to Rimex warehouse off the traveled roadway and from the edge of road to the U west and to the north Leg6=I3.O8km Exchange #6- Sooqucuich l.onghcedlJighwy Ivod' rign On gravel frontage road that goes fiot;; the Saoqnatct tnn to (htehalis F;,rest Scrvicc R;uat, at the Food sign and 5.61n before the power pole. Note: Ultra runners must pass through all exchange points so barricades should be used appropriately. Paul Adams, AIMS/IAAF "A" RO - September 24, 2000 R t - October 27, 2002 R2 - October 12, 2005 RI - September 13,2006 6047373171 BC ATHLETICS - August 8 2007 7c5 BI - - - 03:05:16p.m. 09-07-2007 2f2 Track and hPId Read IunMng MavathOns/Ultras Cross COUntl7 Runidng 'ace WoUdna TO; RCMP - Maple Ridge - Cpl Robert Lemon Phonc 604 - 467- 7628 Fax: 604 - 467 - 7633 FROM: Miranda Reece, BC Athletics - Sport Governing Body for Running and Track & Field Phone: 604 - 317 - 0864 Fax: 604-731-3171 REGARDING: 26th Annual, Haney to Harrison Road Relay EVENT DATE: Saturday, November 3, 2007 NOTIFICATION OF EVENT BC Athleticg, with the co-operation of the Fraser Valley Regional DLstrict, and the Ministry of Transportation will be organi2ing the annual Haney to Harrison Road Relay to take place on Saturday, November 3,2007 from Maple Ridge to Harrison Hot Springs. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I acknowledge that I am aware of the relay running activities which take pl ace on Saturday, Nov 3,2007. Comments: (print name) c• (address) 'ZAc ML,S 1&1 / (signature) (date) JOI /P (phone) (email) 1367 W. 6foadway, Suite 206, Vancouver, BC. Canada, V611 4A9 TeL 604-737-3170 E-maiL bcathLetics(bcithLetics.org 4 Ou..Sçun cIJiA MddWAM Fix. 604-737-3171 Website: www bcattfletics org AVflPCInIdI 03:08:46 p.m. 08-24-2007 1/1 604 737 3076 111114 SPOW INSURANCE MARKETING LTD. BC Athletics (101) AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE THIS is TO CERTIFY THAT POUCIES OF INSURANCE AS HEREIN DESCRIBED HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED BELOW AND ARE IN FORCE AT THE DATE HEREOF: THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF: FRASER VALLEY REGIONAL DISTRICT, CORP. OF THE VILLAGE OF HARRISON HOT SPRINGS, AGASSIZ AGRICULTURAL & HORTICULTURAL. ASSOCIATION, DISTRICT OF KENT, CORP. OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, CITY OF PuT MEADOWS, RIDGE MEADOWS PARKS & LEISURE SERViCES COMMISSION, SCHOOL DISTRICT 42, DISTRICT OF MISSION, CANADIAN FOREST PRODUCTS (CANFOR), RIMEX SUPPLY LTD. , RIVERVIEW FARMS, GURDEV SIDHU, ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH 88, SALUS ENTERPRISES LTD., JR FRASERV1EW HOLDINGS INC., MISSION ALUANCE CHURCH, COUNTRY TIME CHILDREN'S CENTRE, BC HYDRO, SCHOOL DISTRICT 75, SASQUATCH INN ENTERPRISES ABOVE ARE ADDED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED. BUT SOLELY WITH RESPECT TO THE LIABILITY WHICH ARISES OUT OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE NAMED INSURED NAME OF INSURED BC ATHLETiCS ASSOCIATION LOCATION AND OPERATIONS TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE APPLIES MAPLE RIDGE-PITT MEADOWS-DEWDNEY-KENT-AGASSIZ - HARRISON HOT SPRINGS. BC 'HANEY TO HARRISON lOOK ROAD RELAY & ULTRK (INCLUDING AWARDS & DANCE AT AGASSIZ COMMUNITY HALL) NOVEMBER 3. 2007 TO WHOM NOTICE WILL BE MAILED IF SUCH INSURANCE IS CANCELLED OR IS CHANGED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AFFECT THIS CERTiFICATE KiND OF POLICY POLICY NO. INSURERS LIMIT OF LIABILITY GENERAL LIABILITY AS1 064 AVIVA INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA $5,000,000.00 kclusivelimft "DEDUCTIBLE $500.00 POLICY EXTENSIONS CROSS LIABILITY CLAUSE INCLUDED *PARTICIPANT COVERAGE INCLUDED *SUBJECT TO 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE OF CANCELLATION BC MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED THE INSURANCE AFFORDED IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF THE APPLiCABLE POLICY. ALL SPORT INSURANCE MARKETING LTD. August 24, 2007 ALJTHORIZED'REPRESENTATIVE Ins7 507, 1367 West Broadway, Vancouver, BC V6H 4A9 TEL (604) 737-3018 FAX (604) 737-3076 District of Maple Ridge TITT1F Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: September 24, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer AUN: SUBJECT: 2008 Permissive Tax Exemptions EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Municipal Council has statutory powers to exempt certain properties from municipal taxation. Maple Ridge has clearly defined policies with respect to granting property tax exemption. In simple terms the Municipality will not grant property tax exemption to organizations providing services on a private or for profit basis, or where the service is the responsibility of senior government. A bylaw that provides the granting of property tax exemptions for the 2008 taxation year must be adopted on or before October 31, 2007. We recommend for property tax exemption the properties listed in Bylaw No. 6513 - 2007. Our recommendation is in accordance with the Community Charter and Municipal Policies 5.16 to 5.23. RECOMMENDATIONS: That "Maple Ridge Tax Exemption Bylaw 6513 - 2007" be read a first, second and third time. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The Community Charter provides for a general exemption from taxation over which Council does not have any legislative powers or authority. This includes properties such as public schools, public hospitals, buildings set apart for public worship and provincial and municipally owned public buildings and land. Churches are an example of the statutory exemptions that are granted, over which the Municipal Council has no control. This statutory exemption only provides for exemption on the church and the land on which the church stands, leaving any remaining land and improvements as taxable. In 1985, the Municipal Council adopted a bylaw which grants an automatic permissive tax exemption for an additional church hall and the entire parcel of land, to a maximum of 2.0235 hectares (5 acres). Buildings other than the church and church hail are subject to taxation. BC Assessment Authority determines whether or not the property is in compliance with statutory and bylaw requirements. Private Schools are granted exemptions in much the same manner as churches. However, there is no cap on the amount of land or improvements that can be granted a permissive exemption. In order for a private school to qualify for the statutory exemption, which exempts only the school 1131 and the land on which it stands, they must provide a level of education that is equivalent to that furnished in public schools. In 1985, the Municipal Council adopted a bylaw which grants an automatic permissive exemption for additional land and improvements not covered under the statutory exemption Municipal Council has been given statutory powers to exempt certain properties from municipal taxation. For example, these can be land and improvements that are used by not for profit organizations that are deemed to contribute to the well being of the community or private institutions licensed under other legislation such as the Hospital Act, Community Care Facility Act or parts of the School Act. While Council has been given the authority to decide who is to be granted permissive tax exemptions, they only have the ability to exempt the municipal portion of the tax bill as determined by the Community Charter. However, the School Act and the Hospital District Act provide for exemptions of School, GVTA, GVRD, BCAA, and MFA taxes for any properties included in the Municipal Permissive Tax Exemption By-law. Certain exemptions can also be granted by Council for heritage properties and portions of property used for municipal purposes (e.g. parts of Planet Ice, the curling rink and the ECRA Recreation Centre). Maple Ridge has adopted policies with respect to the granting of property tax exemptions. The policies are intended to prevent the downloading/off loading of services that are the responsibility of senior governments and ensure local residents are not subsidizing residents from other municipalities. They also establish that where a permissive tax exemption is granted that all residents of Maple Ridge have access to the service provided and make certain that the property tax exemption does not provide for an unfair competitive advantage. The services provided by the organization are to be an extension of Municipal services and programs and fall under the responsibility of local government. As of January 1, 2004 the granting of Permissive Property Tax Exemptions is governed by sections 224 through 227 of the Community Charter. This legislation has incorporated changes that provides for improved transparency. The Municipality must now advertise the proposed taxation exemption by-law prior to its adoption and we must include the estimated costs associated for each permissive exemption for the year of the exemption plus the following two years. This is regardless of the fact that we only grant exemptions for one taxation year. We must also include a listing of permissive exemptions granted for the year and the taxes forgone in our annual report. b) Desired Outcome: Council must adopt the Permissive Taxation Exemption Bylaw on or before October 31, 2007 to exempt properties from municipal property taxation for 2008. C) Strategic Alignment The sources of municipal revenue are limited and therefore, the municipality supports institutions, organizations and the community at large to enhance the quality of life to its residents. The granting of property tax exemptions to those applicants meeting the criteria of the policies are strategically aligned with: (I) Financial Management - cost effective and efficient delivery of services that are the responsibility of the municipality. Relationships & Partnerships - promote the use of partnerships for the delivery of services. Community Relations - recognize and support the important contribution of volunteers and not for profit groups that provide services that are the responsibility of the municipality. Safe & Livable Community - in partnership with community groups, assist in the provision of leisure and cultural services to ensure access by all citizens. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: Permissive exemptions are designed to support those services that are the responsibility of local government. Inadequate funding from senior governments sometimes results in agencies turning to local government for assistance. The sources of municipal funding are limited and providing exemptions to those groups that fall under the responsibility of senior governments is not feasible. Of the 17 applicants that were approved for a permissive tax exemption for the 2007 taxation year, 16 have been carried forward and are being recommended for a 2008 permissive tax exemption. One exemption is no longer required as the property (annex previously occupied by the RCMP) is no longer used for municipal purposes. There are four new applicants for the 2008 permissive tax exemption. The Fraternal Order of Eagles, Maple Ridge Vineyard Christian Fellowship, The Royal Canadian Legion and TransLink. Of the four, The Fraternal Order of Eagles and Maple Ridge Vineyard Christian Fellowship are being recommended for the exemption. The Royal Canadian Legion and TransLink are not. There are also 28 churches and three private schools being carried forward from the previous year's exemption. A reading file containing a summary listing of applicants has been provided. The four new applications are discussed below. The Fraternal Order of Eagles is a not for profit organization. They donate significant amounts of money to community charities, school events, trail system maintenance, the hospital and so forth. They provide the use of their hall at no cost to certain community groups such as cubs, scouts, and guides. The building, for all intents and purposes, is being run as a community ball in the Yennadon area and as per Council policy, a permissive exemption to a community hall in each region of the municipality can be granted. On this basis, we are recommending a tax exemption for this group, noting that we have supported the group through the municipal grant program in previous years. Maple Ridge Vineyard Christian Fellowship leases property in Maple Ridge. The property is run as a church and offers regular Sunday services and runs youth and family events during the week. The building is open for anyone to drop in and all are welcome to participate in the life of the church. They meet the criteria as set forth by the Community Charter to qualify as a church and would qualify for a statutory exemption if they owned the property. It is through this that they have been recommended for a permissive exemption The Royal Canadian Legion has become increasingly more involved in providing service to our community. They are the largest single provider of low rental accommodation senior's housing of any Legion Branch in Canada and are a founding member of the Earl Haig Society, one of the earliest veterans' housing societies in B.C. Through extensive fund raising, the Legion has made donations to several youth organizations, sports organizations, health service providers, and community groups. These donations cover almost every aspect of life in our community. The Royal Canadian Legion is requesting a partial tax exemption for the portions of the building that are a direct benefit to the community and the many non-profit groups that use the facilities. Denying a permissive tax exemption may affect their ability to support such groups. A survey was conducted among several municipalities in B.C. and there were few that supported Legions through a permissive tax exemption. Most of those that provided exemptions do so for spaces that are solely for community use. The Maple Ridge Legion has no such space. Also, other pubs open their facilities for community fund raising. As per policy, the Legion's application is not recommended for tax exemption but will be considered as part of the municipal grant program. The Golden Ears Bridge is a TransLink project that will provide extensive benefits to our community. It will be an economic driver for the community and a conduit to help build, develop and maintain our municipality. When the bridge is complete, Maple Ridge will become more central in the Greater Vancouver Region, transportation will be more economical, saving time and money, and it will provide better access to and from other markets, including neighbouring municipalities and the United States. TransLink has applied for permissive tax exemptions on 37 properties in Maple Ridge that are associated with the Golden Ears Bridge project and requested refunds on taxes previously paid. They do not meet the criteria as set out in the Community Charter and can not be considered for a permissive tax exemption and there is no section in the Community Charter that would allow for refunds of taxes already paid. TransLink has not received an Order in Council from the Ministry of Transportation, which would provide for a statutory exemption. This is also a regional project and the costs should be borne by the entire region not just the municipalities in which the bridge will be built The three other municipalities involved in this request from TransLink (Surrey, Pitt Meadows, and Township of Langley), will not be recommending TransLink's application for a permissive tax exemption. Interdepartmental Implications: Many Municipal Departments have a close association with the community associations that provide service and support to many community groups and also with TransLink, which is helping to build and shape our community. A denial of a permissive tax exemption can have a negative impact on their operation. Business Plan/Financial Implications: Based on the 2007 assessed values, and using the tax rates for 2008 from the financial plan, the estimated amount attributable to the 2008 proposed tax exemptions for the Municipal portion of taxes is $339,700. The total tax revenue estimate in the financial plan is $45,946,403, putting the proposed exemptions at under 1% of that total. Municipal taxation is approximately 50% of the total tax bill excluding utilities. Policy Implications: The applicants recommended for exemption are in accordance with the adopted policies. The recommendation to deny the two other groups is because they do not meet the Municipal Policy and do not qualify for consideration of an exemption under the terms of the Community Charter. Alternatives: Tax exemption leads to a tax shift to other groups. An option for Council is to provide a financial grant to assist those organizations providing community services that the Council wishes to support. Grants are an annual budget decision and are limited to one year. Council has used this option from time to time. Providing grants does not relieve senior levels of government from their responsibility to the community. Therefore, the potential for downloading costs to the Municipality is somewhat reduced. CONCLUSIONS: In reviewing the requests for permissive exemptions, Council Members should ensure: The use is consistent with Municipal policies, plans, bylaws, codes and regulations. This will ensure the goals, policies, and general operating principles of the Municipality as a whole are reflected in the organizations that receive Municipal support. Exemptions are not given to services that are otherwise provided on a private, for profit basis. This would provide an unfair competitive advantage. The services provided by the organization should be an extension of Municipal services and programs and must fall under the responsibility of local government. Senior government program costs must not be transferred to property taxpayers, as this would represent double taxation and an inequitable tax burden. Primarily Maple Ridge residents should use the services and the organization's regulations must allow all Maple Ridge residents to participate. The taxation burden resulting from the exemption must be a justifiable expense to the taxpayers of the Municipality. The sources of Municipal revenue are limited and requests for exemption must be considered in concert with other needs of the Municipality. A reading file with an application summary is provided for your information Prepared by. ye Wyke Accounting Clerk 2 Approved by: Kathleen Gormley / Manager of Finance Business Systems Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, CGA fi GM - Corp. Fin. Services ((Jim) Rule / lef Admihistrtive officer SBW:sbw CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6513 - 2007 A Bylaw to exempt from taxation, certain properties within the District of Maple Ridge WHEREAS, pursuant to provisions of the Community Charter, S.B.C., 2003, Chapter 26, a Municipal Council may exempt certain land and improvements from taxation, where, in the opinion of the Municipal Council, the use of the land and improvements qualifies for exemption; AND WHEREAS, the Municipal Council deems it expedient to exempt certain land and improvements; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Tax Exemption Bylaw No. 6513 - 2007". That in accordance with Section 224(2)(i) of the Community Charter, the following lands and improvements owned or held by an athletic or service club or association and used principally as a public park or recreation ground or for public athletic or recreational purposes be exempt from taxation: Owned by the Albion Community Club (Albion Community Hall) Roll No.: 84174-0100-3 10017 - 240th Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption L Exemption Exemption 266,100 2,480.33_J 2,615.26 2,755.18 Owned by the Ruskin Community Hall Roll No.: 94856-0000-8 28395 - 96th Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 320,400 2,986.46 3,148.93 3,317.39 Owned by the Girl Guides of Canada Roll No.: 05322-0300-1 26521 Ferguson Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 470,900 4,389.28 4,628.06 4,875.66 Owned by the Scout Properties (B.C./Yukon) Ltd. Roll No.: 05299-0100-0 27660 Dewdney Trunk Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 1,166,000 10,868.34 11,459.57 12,072.66 Portion of Land and Improvements owned by the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Leased to: Elderly Citizens Recreation Association Roll No.: 52700-0001-0 12148_224thStreet 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 1,914,000 25,275.32 26,650.30 28,076.09 Owned by the Fraternal Order of Eagles, Maple Ridge Aerie #283 1 Roll No.: 73878-0300-6 23461 - 132nd Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 488,000 4,548.67 4,796.12 5,052.71 That in accordance with Section 224(2)(i) of the Community Charter, the following lands and improvements owned or held by an athletic or service club or association and used principally as a public park or recreation ground or for public athletic or recreational purposes be exempt from taxation; and in accordance with Section 225(2)(e) of the Community Charter, the following land and improvements that are eligible golf course property, being land maintained as a golf course be exempt from taxation: (e) Owned by the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Leased to: Maple Ridge Golf Course Ltd. (Public Golf Course) Roll No.: 21238-1001-1 20818 Golf Lane 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 2,589,700 26,242.65 27,670.24 29,150.60 That in accordance with Section 224(2)(a) of the Community Charter, the following land and improvements that are owned by a charitable, philanthropic, or other not for profit corporation, and the council consider are used for the same purpose be exempt from taxation: -2- (a) Owned by the Maple Ridge Search and Rescue Society Roll No.: 84120-0005-0 23598 - 105th Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 295,000 3,895.62 4,107.54 4,327.30 5. That in accordance with Section 224(2)(d) of the Community Charter, the interest in land and improvements of municipal buildings of a non-profit organization specified by the council that the non-profit organization uses or occupies as a licensee or tenant of the municipality, shall be exempt from taxation: Owned by the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Leased to: The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Roll No.: 84292-0100-2 10235 Industrial Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 157,100 2,074.58 2,187.44 2,304.47 Owned by the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Leased to: Ridge Meadows Recycling Society Roll. No.: 84112-0001-0 10092 - 236th Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 719,000 9,494.75 10,011.27 10,546.87 6. That in accordance with Section 224(2)(f) of the Community Charter, in relation to property that is exempt under section 220(1)(h) [buildings for public worship], the following land and improvements, that have been deemed as necessary to the building set apart for public worship, be exempt from taxation: (a) Owned by Wildwood Fellowship Church RoIlNo.: 05071-0100-5 10810 - 272nd Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 176,600 1,646.10 1,735.64 1,828.50 -3- Owned by Pt. Hammond United Church Roll No.: 10622-01.00-0 11391 Dartford Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 110,300 [ 1,028.11 1,084.04 1,142.04 Owned by Christian & Missionary Alliance - Canadian Pacific District Roll No.: 20804-0401-1 20399 Dewdney Trunk Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 381,300 3,554.11 3,747.46 3,947.95 Owned by the St. Pauls Evangelical Lutheran Church of Haney B.C. Roll No.: 20861-0100-4 12145 Laity Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 304,000 2,833.60 2,987.74 3,147.59 Owned by the St. John the Divine Anglican Church Roll No.: 20920-0100-1 21299 River Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 398,000 3,709.78 3,911.59 4,120.86 Owned by Roman Catholic Archbishop of Vancouver Church Roll No.: 21140-0400-1 20285 Dewdney Trunk Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 743,000 6,925.53 7,302.28 7,692.96 Owned by the Christian Reformed Church of Maple Ridge B.C. Roll No.: 2 1142-3300-3 20245 Dewdney Trunk Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 436,200 4,065.84 4,287.02 4,516.38 -4- Owned by the Burnett Fellowship Baptist Church Roll No.: 21190-0001-0 20639 - 123rd Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 253,100 2,359.16 2,487.49 2,620.57 Owned by the President of the Lethbridge Stake (Mormon Church) Roll No.: 21255-0201-X 11750 - 207th Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 332,500 3,099.25 3,267.85 3,442.68 Owned by the Trustees of the Maple Ridge East Congregation of Jehovah's Roll No.: 2 1335-2200-2 11770 West Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 260,100 2,424.40 2,556.29 2,693.05 Owned by First Church Christ Scientist Roll No.: 3 1678-0000-8 11916 - 222nd Street 007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 50,900 474.44 500.25 527.01 (1) Owned by The Church of the Nazarene Roll No.: 41990-0000-8 21467 Dewdney Trunk Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 333,053 3,104.40 3,273.28 3,448.40 (m) Owned by the High Way Church Roll No.: 42162-0000-X 21746 Lougheed Highway 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 354,100 3,300.58 3,480.13 3,666.32 -5- Owned by the Trustees of the Congregation of the Haney Presbyterian Church Roll No.: 42176-0000-8 11858 - 216th Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated j Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 393,800 3,670.63 3,870.31 4,077.37 Owned by the Trustees of St. Andrews Congregation of the United Church of Canada Roll No.: 42249-0100-6 22165 Dewdney Trunk Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 394,000 3,672.49 3,872.27 4,079.44 (p) Owned by M.R. Baptist Church Roll No.: 42331-0100-1 22155 Lougheed Highway 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 2,139,700 19,944.24 21,029.20 22,154.26 Owned by the Trustees of Webster's Corner United Church Roll No.: 63029-0100-5 25102 Dewdney Trunk Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 171,600 1,599.49 1,686.50 1,776.73 Owned by Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada Roll No.: 63163-2300-2 11756 - 232nd Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 790,000 7,363.62 7,764.20 8,179.59 Owned by Lord Bishop of New Westminster (St. John Evangelical) Roll No.: 94720-0001-0 27123 River Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 471,900 4,398.60 4,637.88 4,886.01 (n) (0) * Owned by the United Church of Canada Roll No.: 947 17-0000-0 27079 River Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 101,200 943.29 994.60 1,047.82 Owned by Whonnock United Church Roll No.: 94719-0000-1 27091 River Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 205,000 1,910.81 2,014.76 2,122.55 Owned by Trustees of the Congregation of Whonnock United Church Roll No.: 94741-0200-4 272nd Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 63,300 590.02 622.12 655.40 Owned by Ruskin Gospel Church Roll No.: 94803-0100-3 28304 - 96th Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 246,600 2,298.57 2,423.61 2,553.27 Owned by Roman Catholic Archbishop of Vancouver Roll No.: 52788-0000-8 22561- 121st Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 217,700 2,029.19 2,139.58 2,254.05 Owned by The B.C. Conference of the Mennonite Brethren Churches Inc. Roll No.: 20762-0305-0 20450 Dewdney Trunk Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 1,491,000 13,897.6714,653.71 15,437.68 -7- (z) Owned by The Parish of St. George, Maple Ridge Roll No.: 63157-2001-1 23500 Dewdney Trunk Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 296,200 2,760.89 2,911.09 3,066.83 (aa) Owned by Generations Christian Fellowship Roll No.: 2 1034-0000-8 11601 Laity Street 2007 Exempt Estimated J Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption j Exemption Exemption 637,000 5,937.50 6,260.50 6,595.44 (bb) Owned by Apostles of Infinite Love, Canada Roll No.: 94906-0000-3 27289 - 96th Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 216,000 2,013.35 2,122.87 2,236.44 7. That in accordance with Section 224(2)(g) of the Community Charter, land or improvements used or occupied by a religious organization, as tenant or licensee, for the purpose of public worship or for the purposes of a hall that the council considers is necessary to land or improvements so used or occupied, be exempt from taxation: (a) Leased by Maple Ridge Vineyard Christian Fellowship Roll No.: 31594-0000-1 22336 Dewdney Trunk Road 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 502,000 6,629.16 6,989.79 7,363.74 8. That in accordance with Section 224(2)(h) of the Community Charter, in relation to property that is exempt under section 220(1)(1) [private schools], any area of land surrounding the exempt building shall be exempt from taxation: (b) Owned by Haney - Pitt Meadows Christian School Association Roll No.: 20806-0400-0 12140 - 203rd Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 424,400 5,604.41 5,909.29 6,225.44 -8- Owned by Meadowridge School Society Roll No.: 63414-0001-0 12224 - 240th Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 1,053,000 13,905.39 14,661.84 15,446.25 Owned by Roman Catholic Archbishop of Vancouver Roll No.: 52788-0000-8 22561 - 121st Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 215,000 2,839.18 2,993.63 3,153.79 9. That in accordance with Section 225(2)(b) of the Community Charter the following Heritage lands and improvements shall be exempt from taxation: Owned by the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Leased to: The Maple Ridge Historical Society (Haney House) Roll No.: 31790-0000-4 11612 - 224th Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 428,000 1,641.27 1,730.56 1,823.14 Owned by the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Leased to: The Maple Ridge Historical Society (Haney Brick Yard Office & Haney Brick Yard House) Roll No.: 31962-0502-3 22520 - 116th Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated • Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 518,000 6,840.45 7,212.57 7,598.44 Owned by the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Leased to: The Maple Ridge Historical Society (St. Andrew's United Church) Roll No.: 3 1428-0000-1 22279 - 116th Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 154,000 2,033.65 2,144.28 2,259.00 S Owned by the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Leased to: Fraser Information Society (Old Japanese School House) Roll No.: 31492-0000-3 11739 - 223rd Street 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 242,300 3,199.69 3,373.76 3,554.25 Owned by Prince David Temple Society (Masonic Lodge) Roll No.: 31429-0100-0 22272 - 116th Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 293,300 3,873.17 4,083.87 4,302.36 10. That in accordance with Section 224(2)(c) of the Community Charter, "land or improvements that the council considers would otherwise qualify for exemption under section 220 [general statutory exemptions] were it not for a second use", the council may, by the adoption of a by-law, determine the proportions of the land and improvements that are to be exempt and taxable; and Section 224(2)(i) of the Community Charter, land or improvements owned or held by an athletic or service club or association and used principally as a public park or recreation ground or for public athletic or recreational purposes, shall be exempt from taxation as by the proportions set in accordance with Section 224(2)(c) of the Community Charter. Land and Improvements owned by the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Herein called Cam Neely Arena, shall be exempted from 90% of taxation Roll No.: 84120-0002-0 23448 - 105th Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 3,670,000 48,464.17 51,100.62 53,834.51 Land and Improvements owned by the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Herein balled The Golden Ears Winter Club, shall be exempted from 95% of taxation Roll No.: 84120-0004-0 23588 - 105th Avenue 2007 Exempt Estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Value 2008 2009 2010 Exemption Exemption Exemption 3,094,000 40,857.81 43,080.47 45,385.28 Included within each of the exemptions 8(a) and 8(b) is a proportionate share (based on the square footage areas of Cam Neely Arena, The Golden Ears Winter Club, and the remainder of the building) of all entrances, lobbies, change rooms, stairs, elevators, hallways, foyers and other common use areas of the lands and improvements. - - 10- The exemption from taxation as herein before noted applies for the year 2008. The exemptions granted by this bylaw are without prejudice to any claim for entitlement to exemption based on any other provisions of the Community Charter or any other legislation. READ a FIRST TIME the _______ day of ______,200. READ a SECOND TIME the day of , 200. READ a THIRD TIME the _______ day of , 200. RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of , 200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER