Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-11-19 - Committee of the Whole - Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge COMMI1TEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA November 19, 2007 4:00 p.m. Council Chamber PLEASE NOTE CHANGE OF TIME Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review and debate of issues. No voting takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more information or clarification. Chair: Acting Mayor DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SER VICES Note: Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications may be permitted to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes. Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda: 1101 RZ/030/07, 12367 224 Street, RS-1 to RM-2 Staff report dated November 8, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6522-2007 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6523-2007 to permit a 33 unit townhouse development be given first and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1102 VP/077/07, 22017 124 Avenue Staff repOrt dated November 5, 2007 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/077/07 to vary the minimum rear yard setback on proposed Lot 4 in support of a 4 lot subdivision. Committee of the Whole Agenda November 19, 2007 Page 2 of 3 1103 Kanaka Way Traffic Safety Improvements Staff report dated November 14, 2007 recommending the amendment of the Financial Plan to reallocate funding as detailed in the report. 1104 Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park, Use of Streets Staff report dated November 9, 2007 recommending the use of municipal streets be authorized for the Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park on Saturday, December 1, 2007. 1105 Holding Tank Bylaw for Waldun Group, 9393 - 287 Street Staff report dated November 13, 2007 recommending that Maple Ridge Holding Tank (Waldun Group, 9393-287 Street) Bylaw No. 6525-2007 be read a first, second and third time. FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERVICES (including Fire and Police) 1131 Disbursements for the month ended October 31, 2007 Staff report dated November 9, 2007 recommending that the disbursements for October 2007 be approved. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTAND RECREATION SERVICES 1151 Jackson Farm Staff report dated November 13, 2007 recommending the deferral of any development proposal for Jackson Farm until completion of the Cemetery Master Plan and the 2008 Parks, Recreation and Cultural Plan update. 1152 Tourism Fee for Service Agreement Staff report dated November 14, 2007 recommending that the Tourism Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Fee for Service Agreement be renewed for 2008. 1153 2008 UBCM Tourism Funding Staff report dated November 14, 2007 recommending that an application for Tourism funding be submitted to the Union of British Columbia Municipalities. 4 nat. Committee of the Whole Agenda November 19, 2007 Page 3 of 3 1154 Joint Municipal Emergency Program Agreement Staff report dated November 15, 2007 recommending that the Joint Municipal Emergency Program Agreement be approved. CORRESPONDENCE 1171 OTHER ISSUES 1181 ADJOURNMENT COMMUNITY FORUM COMMUNITY FORUM The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to speak with Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). The total time for this Forum is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a response will be given. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. If a member of the public has a concern related to a Municipal staff member, it should be brought to the attention of the Mayor and/or Chief Administrative Officer in a private meeting. Other opportunities to address Council may be available through the office of the Manager of Legislative Services who can be contacted at 463-5221 or by e-mail at cmarlo@mapleridge.ca . Checked by:_____________ Date: 67/Ft(/5 4 .* DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE British TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: November 8, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/030/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6522-2007 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6523-2007 12367 224 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential), to permit a stacked Townhouse Development of 33 Units (four 3 bedroom, sixteen 2 bedroom, nine 1 bedroom with den and four 1 bedroom units). Schedule RB" and Schedule "C"of the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan will require an amendment due to change in land use and the conservation boundary. The setback area around Morse Creek will be re-vegetated and dedicated to the District as part of the Watercourse Development Permit. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6522-2007 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6522-2007 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a public hearing on the bylaw; That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6522-2007 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6522- 2007 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6523-2007 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. I. Amendment to Schedule "B" and "C" of the Official Community Plan; Il. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; 1101 Ill. Registration of a statutory right-of-way agreement for drainage; An Amenity Restrictive Covenant must be registered at the Land Title Office; Registration of a Geotechnical Restrictive Covenant along with the geotechnical report which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking; Road dedication as required on 224th Street; Park dedication as required; Removal of the existing buildings; Notification to the Ministry of Environment and Federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans, regarding proposed in stream works. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Nystar Developments Corp Owner: Nystar Developments Corp Legal Description: Lot: B, D.L.: 399, Plan: 8914 (PID: 007-822-464) OCP: Existing: Residential (62 %) and Conservation (38 %) Proposed: Residential and Conservation Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses North: South RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Use: Single Family Residential and Conservation Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation Use: Single Family Residential and Conservation Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation East: Use: Zone: Designation West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Single Family Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Multi-Family Residential RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential) and RM-5 (Low-Density Apartment Residential) Urban Residential and Conservation Single Family Dwelling. Medium Density Stacked Townhouses. 0.624 Ha (1.54 acres) 224th Street Full Urban DP/030/07 and VP/030/07 -2- Project Description: The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property at 12367 224 Street from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit a stacked Townhouse Development of 33 units. Stacked townhouses, rather than apartments, have been proposed for better neighborhood fit and street presence. To allow greater density and more urban feel to the project, underground parking is proposed. The massing concept of the project attempts to break up the 3 storey scale into a series of smaller elements by: stepping the unit placement to avoid long uninterrupted walls; sloping roof forms (not flat roofs); stepping the massing down at the building ends from 3 storeys to 2 storeys and utilizing bay windows/dormers and articulated balconies/porches. A preliminary Geotechnical Site Assessment Report dated November 20, 2006 has been submitted by "GeoPacific Consultants Ltd." indicating the site suitable for residential development. An Environmental Assessment Report dated July 21, 2006 has been submitted by Letts Envirowise Consultants Ltd. with recommendations for a 15 m setback from Morse Creek and infilling of the gulch existing in the centre along the property line on the north. They have submitted preliminary "Storm Water management" and "Erosion Sediment Control" plans, which will be reviewed, finalized and attached to the Watercourse Development Permit at a later date. Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The Official Community Plan currently designates this property as "Urban Residential" and lies within the Regional Town Center study area. This designation encourages all forms of housing along with mixed uses where appropriate. 224th Street is considered a major corridor as it is a street built in whole or part to a collector standard as per policy 3-18(2) (ii). The subject property designation shows 62 % Urban residential and 38 % Conservation. The proposed residential development occupies 44.10 % (2,752 m 2) of the site with the rest of the area (63 % of the site) being dedicated to the District as "Park". This dedication will trigger an OCP amendment to the conservation boundary of Schedules "B" and "C". As per Policy 3-22 of the Official Community Plan, residential capacity within the Regional Town Centre will be given priority to help accommodate the 7,000 new dwelling units anticipated by 2021. This growth is expected to help revitalize the downtown area and provide a supportive population base for local businesses and transit. A 'range of housing types and sizes also provides more opportunities for rental housing and housing that may serve a variety of income levels. It provides residents the opportunity to live in proximity to shops and services. This proposal with varied unit sizes ranging from as small as 59.36 m 2 to 119 m2, is an effort towards the District's many efforts of achieving this residential density and providing more affordable housing within the Regional Town Centre. Maple Ridge Regional Town Centre Concept Plan: The Regional Town Centre Area Plan process was approved by Council earlier this year and will be based on the goals and recommendations outlined in the Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan -3- ,, .. and the Smart Growth on Ground principles. It encourages higher density residential development and a range of housing forms in the core area in order to help increase the population base to support local businesses and transit and to increase public safety in relatively complete communities like the Town Centre that allows residents to live, work, play and shop. The Concept Plan indicates that this property be utilized for Multi-Family Housing. The proposal aligns with the Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan in the following ways: • The development proposal is for medium density stacked town houses residential development, with a mix of one, two and three bedroom dwelling units; • Each dwelling unit contains a balcony area, providing opportunities for informal surveillance within the development and to the Street and surrounding area; • The applicant has submitted a LEED checklist outlining the components from the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System they believe the project can achieve. Green Building Design: Due to its location within the Regional Town Center Area, the architect will be required to submit a Green Building Report with a LEEDs covenant which will be attached to the Development Permit. The architect has submitted a preliminary checklist aimed to achieve 14 LEED points (note: the applicant is not intending to certify the building). Zoning Bylaw: The proposed RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone allows a medium density apartment use containing some townhouses and specifies a Floor Space Ratio of 1.8. The applicant has proposed a three storey wood frame building with an FSR of 1.12 (total proposed built up area= 3061.5 m2). The RM-2 zone requires a common usable open space of 20% of the net lot area along with a common activity area of 1.0 m 2 area per unit (total area required = 583.31 m 2). The applicant has proposed a common usable open space of 599.205 m 2 which is 21.7 % of the net lot area. Proposed Variances to the Zoning Bylaw: The proposed building complies with the density and height requirements of the zone but some setback variances will be requested. The RM-2 requires a 7.5 m setback on all four sides. The following setback variances have been requested by the applicant: - A Front (East) setback variance from 7.5 m to 6.0 m; - A South side setback variance from 7.5 m to 6.0 m; - A North side setback variance from 7.5 m to 6.0 m; - A Rear (West) setback variance from 7.5 m to 3.0 m; - A balcony setback variance of from 6.89 m to 4.4 m on the north and 4.16 m on the South. The applicant has submitted a Development Variance Permit application in conjunction with the Development Permit application for Council to consider prior to final reading. A Development Permit Report describing the compliance with the Multi-Family Development Permit Guidelines and outlining the variances requested will follow for Council's review at a later date. Parking Bylaw: As per Maple Ridge 0ff-street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990, the proposed RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone requires 1.5 parking spaces per apartment plus 0.2 spaces per unit for visitors parking. This project requires 49.5 parking spaces for residents and 6.6 -4- spaces for visitors, totaling 56.1 spaces. The applicant has proposed 58 parking spaces of which 8 are for visitors. DeveloDment Permits: The subject site is located within two DP areas: o The Regional Town Center Development Permit area; o The Watercourse Development Permit area. The Official Community Plan policies speak to managing growth within the Urban Area Boundary with the highest density occurring in the Regional Town Centre area. This proposal of 33 unit stacked townhouses is subject to the "Multi-Family Development Permit Guidelines" and the "Watercourse Development Permit Guidelines" which will form the subject of future Development Permit reports for Council's consideration prior to Final Reading of the OCP and Zoning amendment bylaws. Advisory Design Panel: On October 9, 2007 the proposed development was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel. The panel had several positive comments on the concept and design and had the following recommendations for revisions: o North side of the ramp going down to the underground parking extends unto the property line - protection of existing trees and root zones preferred; hence complete an assessment of the existing trees on the adjacent property. • Consider alternate planter material within the courtyard. • Articulation of massing between two buildings. • Reconsideration of the Gazebo entry. The project architect has made some revisions based on the above recommendations, which have been sent to the panel members. A tree survey was done by a Certified Arborist and Danger Tree Assessor who recommends that most of the existing trees that line the north property line have been previously topped or are heavily inundated with English ivy and need removal. Most of the other larger trees on the site appear to be of average health and structurally sound at this time. 7 trees need to be removed as soon as possible and 16 trees removed prior to any heavy equipment working around them. On the southwest corner of the proposed building envelope, if the building can be moved slightly north, the chances of tree survival increase and the risk to new dwellings decreases. The remaining identified trees appear to be retainable if appropriate protection measures are implemented. DeveloDment Information Meeting: On November 9, 2007 the applicant and the architect held the "Public Information Meeting" at the Fraser Valley Regional Library on Dewdney Trunk Road from 5-00 to 6-30 PM. This meeting was attended by 12 people and some highlights were: • Generally speaking, the neighbours appeared to understand that the zoning would allow this project and there was considerable discussion regarding what they could do with their own properties in the future. There were several comments regarding a positive response to the overall look of the project and an appreciation that the project utilized underground parking. A -5- • Neighbours to the south requested lots of landscaping and a fence be provided between this project and their property. • Seven people support the project and think it is a good development. • Three people (residents on the north of subject site) did not have any comments. • Two people did not support the project (owners of the home across the street at 12386 224 Street) with their main objection being, vehicles coming out of the underground parking at night would have their headlights shine into their living room window. The developer offered to provide some measures that would reduce this impact on the single family house of the neighbours across, including some sort of shutter, screen or reflective film for this window, or some sort of added landscaping, and they appeared to be interested in discussing this further. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Enineerin Department: The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments: • Road dedication of 1.0 m across 224th Street and a statutory right-of-way may be required in support of a municipal storm sewer. • Confirming capacity of the existing sanitary sewer on 224th by applicant's engineer. • Two street lights and one control base, plus ducting across the full site frontage are required on 224tn Street and site utility company connections have to be underground. • A 1.8 m wide separated sidewalk, grassed boulevard, a current standard curb and gutter needs to be constructed along the west side of 224th Street, across the site frontage. If it is determined that certain trees are to be retained along the west side of 224th Street, the sidewalk can be placed at the curb to give clearance to the trees. Fire Department: The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments: • A fire alarm system for the complex that not only includes the parkade but each townhouse unit along with a graphic enunciator at the Gazebo entrance that shows location of all units by address, a site map and alarm is required. • Exact locations of fire related infrastructure including lane and pathway measurements and overhead obstructions have to be specified on the Site Plan. • Pathway from the street through the Gazebo is to be a minimum of 1.8 m (6 feet) wide. • Ensure measures to maintain security and fire department access which can be achieved by a magnetic lock installed to code in the underground parakade and visitor parking to be separated by durable material for security reasons. • Ensure security against unauthorized entry on vacant property at all times. • All Fire Department connection requires being of standard specifications and the location to be such that it ensures visibility at all times. Financial Implications The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the rezoning is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements which depends on the number of street trees determined at the Development Permit Stage through the landscaping plans. An Enhancement and Protection Agreement" with the deposit of security and maintenance period as outlined in the Agreement will be required along with the Water Course Development Permit. A 2.5 % of the total construction cost of the proposed development will be required at the Development Permit stage. Environmental Implications: The Environmental Implications will be discussed in detail through the Watercourse Development Permit report that will follow for Council's review at a later date. CONCLUSION: The proposed development is centrally located in the Regional Town Centre with respect to many public transport choices, services and amenities. It is compatible with the surrounding uses and fits well with the policies of promoting increased density within the Regional Town Center as stated in the Official Community Plan. This proposal with varied unit sizes ranging from as small as 59.36 m 2 to 119 m 2, is an effort towards District's many efforts of achieving this residential density and providing more affordable housing within the Regional Town Centre. The proposal promises environmental upgrades to Morse Creek with re-vegetation around it and park dedication; however some variances will have to be supported. lLfJJ Prepared by. Rasika Acháya, B-Arch, M-Tech, UD (SFU) MCIP Approved by:/ Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM; Public k1ks 8,lopment Services Concurrence: J.A. (Jim) Rule a'hief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6522-2007 Appendix C- Zone Amending Bylaw No.6523-2007 Appendix D- Architectural Plans Appendix E- Landscape Plans Appendix F- LEEDs Checklist -8- APPr,x 'A' 9 15 12496 _________ 24 4 12497 I CD2 J I25AVE. P2(14 F- a. 12486 I I 12484 3 I i I 1 3j4I5I 6j 7 I 89 ol 14 I R2 cq 36 12417 22 ________________ _ 12483 'h1MI I I 10 11 a. 12472 8 12415 777 258ã9 12478 13 2460 1 104 105 106 107 .j 'CD A 12461 _______ 21 CD P741 12458 21 12468 12462 1 2 I B a. 12 20 S63 6 12455 ENGA. 12460 12451 12450 1 D l2445 19 I 12450 12445 19 /_C04 F-. 12435 I i I 12438 100 101 102 1 2 I 0-3 12425 2440 o f P25l4 j P 97 91 4 a. 10 12444 12433 18 2 7911 12430 12415 1 2 1 2 12424 117 i 1 DC Rem3 2 Ia. 12422 I P7i108 P70062 _256 (" 16 9 xo. DCRem1 2396 2 SUBJECT PROPERTY 4 Rem3 _______ P18957 1 2 P70062 7liq 12385 154 I 2 RPl9Pi4!1;7 P 38983 12386 67 i Re \" P 24278 N 1/2 of 13 P1479v 12344 2 ______ 1 12345 12 P1161 P8914 NWS 2464 S 1/2 C P 72069 12333 12334 Rem I 2325 1 A \43 P80319 12306 P75480 NWS 3018 P 8914 NWS 2777 E 12206 12283 21 man P1 1 MAPLE RIDGE MWs 'ct of 14 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley TE: Apr 20, 2007 FILE: RZ/030/07 CD 12497 13 0. 34 14 0 12487 15 39 16 12411 a- 40 12461 18 33 19 12451 20 32 12441 L 21 12429 [ 22 F 23 1 2 104 12417 124 AVE. 1 2 0) CD CD C'1 co 12370 4 12360 0 5 a. 6 12340 7 12330 8 12320 1 = 9 12312 LMP 4403 10 12306 LMS 608 Ii 12294 12 p CD 13 a. 12286 14 12258 23 AVE. . A BCP 15645 LMP 50617 1 12275 2258 BCP 21579 I I.MP 13628 12367224 STREET 4 CORPORATION OF * THE DISTRICT OF PptElsbix , CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6522-2007 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "B" & "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amendment Bylaw No. 6522-2007 Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: -• Lot B, District Lot 399, Group 1, New Westminster Plan 8914 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 739, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby redesignated to Conservation. Schedule C" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot B, District Lot 399, Group 1, New Westminster Plan 8914 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 740, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 200. READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 200. READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. 18 Jci- Z~Llj j j\& 2_12415I 72433 L72430 NWS 1 74 1240511 P70001 LLJ P 708 T131 15.2 16 7.5C~ Total a 1\1 MP 6917 12427 EP 71109 cli LMP 6711 LMP 6738 LMP 8710 L2 124 AVE. Rem 1 12396 2 Rem Rem 4 Rem 3 _________ P 18957 I 5 P 19826 2 12385 154 f 14 P 38983 12386 / / / j 67ha. P 2427872367 12347 / P 147130 12344 1 3J2EE72 K 2 12345 L2 P 8914 NWS 2464 \\ \ 3 112 C 12333 .555 ha 12334 Rem 1 42 12325 P 41 225 / P 80319 ) 43 723051 / MAPLE HDCE OFFCAL COMMUNTY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6522-2007 Map No. 740 PURPOSE: TO ADD TO CONSERVATION 1:1500 4 • "ft APPEIJb;x 'C' CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6523-2007 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6523-2007." That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot B, District Lot 399, Group 1, New Westminster Plan 8914 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1413, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the 4day of ,A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER I'vv 4'-1-u -1 \ em 1 I 80319 ) S 301k MAPLE RDCE ZONE AMENDNC Bylaw No. 6523-2007 Map No. 1413 From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) IRLiIIIS] I 33 Stacked Townhouses for Nyslar flevelopments 12367- 224 Street DIstrict of Maple Ridge, B.C. L - - - - - - - - PN, STATISTICS & ELEVATION .: , Al 224 Street ELEVATION IIJ K H' SSMRII STATISTICS: ADDRESS UNIT COUNT LEGAL DESCRIPTION .U3. o 1 SITE L SETBACKS DENSITY: UNIT MIX: [ - I TI.III V - ITY ••i ii I - B BUILDING 1 I..- - fl'IIITI // \Jt"pfl* 11!t . ul tb 4 I iaI'1 ii TI NEI Of - - ---. U I BUILDING l:NORTH ELEVATION RAMP SECTION LOOKING SOUTH RAMP SECTION LOOKING NORTH L ilL:,::______________________ - COURTV*RDENTRYGAZEQOOflAILS / / 7 I / ilL WEST EXIT STAIR TRELLis ITfTAIL / !l U - ij !I ! II Ui I- U) flOPOSEDHfW PuIOflRYY tNt —,,— —I—.- RON ALLEN ARCHITECT INC. 33 Stacked Townhouses br Nystar Developments 12367-224 Street District of Maple Ridge, B.C. UIG PARKING PLAN SIDE ELEVATtONS I/16-T'-O " MtI2OO7 : A2 'p PA I Af'Pbjx t gm BUILDING I - NORTH ELEVATION - bUILDUNU 2A & 0 - SOUTH ELEVATION 014' Old, 'qO 'P'1 alt t4lt Wl"O'I' a,. a I. '141. at. I. 'c"P'P'MliI'ild ,d. 1*4 It IoII.fl 1IIINM4 'I (I1l'Vl S 3.1 NJJFd() ri, 1vtI CD J,IP*,PII SP'JM 1..JPe,d., p',.d'..t'j ,qta,d P'W'I AtPWø P!lV' 'flI"'' $q&CW ' t,IqIPP.P'I'PW. AE IVNUIIfl NUSIO JI*'N I (N I — I •..I — r — I' tA LLJ ---- 'H5 / L 'I H, j: _/•' 'I , LL SIAI11ONII(flH) 6Z IVINNIUiJ U. II 0 11111111 WVPJ IY.)INVII)I XIS) III JNVI,i U IllS flISvIIl.lflI 5'l•I "11 P"l -- '" / .........-- SIll 11(1)11:1 j/ll lWVPJ 5(11151:1 U • IIAN OI1E I / Oflhk TREE L :::U ) r\ tTLIL ihUlU 1Iui I1 L vi W.II!u iiMiiLI - •I I I I Pt , q 0 'oc - • : ° • o'er . LI LEED BC Registered Project Checklist 33 Stacked Townhouses for Nystar Development TO 12367 - 224th Street Yes 7 No Maple Ridge, B.C. LIII __ Prereq 1 Erosion & Sedimentation Control Required Prereq 2 Riparlan-Wetiand Protection Required Y Credit I Site Selection 1 Credit 2 Development Density N Credit 3 Redevelopment of Contaminated Site 1 Y Credit 4.1 Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation Access 1 Y CredIt 4.2 Alternative Transportation, Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms 1 N Credit 4.3 Alternative Transportation, Alternative Fuel Vehicles 1 N Credit 4.4 Alternative Transportation, Parking Capacity 1 N Credit 5.1 Reduced Site Disturbance, Protect or Restore Open Space Credit 5.2 Reduced Site Disturbance, Development Footprint N Credit 6.1 Stormwater Management, Rate and Quantity N Credit 6.2 Stormwater Management, Treatment 1 Credit 7.1 Heat Island Effect, Non-Roof N Credit 7.2 Heat Island Effect, Roof 1 V Credit 8 Light Pollution Reduction Credit 1.1 Water Efficient Landscaping, Reduce by 50% N Credit 1.2 Water Efficient Landscaping, No Potable Use or No Irrigation 1 N Credit 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies N Credit 3.1 Water Use Reduction, 20% Reduction 1 N Credit 3.2 Water Use Reduction, 30% Reduction Yes 7 No CaGE LEED eck list 'age 1 Prereq I Fundamental Building Systems Commissloniuig Prereq 2 Minimum Energy Performance Prereq 3 CFC Reduction in HVAC&R Equipment Credit 1 Optimize Energy Performance Credit 2.1 Renewable Energy, 5% Credit 2.2 Renewable Energy, 10% Credit 2.3 Renewable Energy 20% Credit 3 Best Practice Commissioning Credit 4 ElImination of HCFCs and Halons Credit 5 Measurement & Verification Credit 6 Green Power Required Required Required Ito 10 CaGBC LEED BC Checklist Page 2 Yes 7 ..' Yes 7 No Prereq 1 Storage & Collection of Recyclables Required Credit 1.1 BuIlding Reuse, Maintain 75% of Existing Walls, Floors and Roof 1 Credit 1.2 Building Reuse, Maintain 95% of Existing Walls, Floors and Roof Credit 1.3 BuIlding Reuse, Maintain 95% shell and 50% non-shell 1 Credit 2.1 ConstructIon Waste Management, Divert 50% 1 Credit 2.2 Construction Waste Management, Divert 75% 1 Credit 3.1 Resource Reuse, Specify 5% 1 Credit 3.2 Resource Reuse, Specify 10% 1 Credit 4.1 Recycled Content, Specify 5% (post-consumer + 1A post-industrial) 1 Credit 4.2 Recycled Content, Specify 10% (post-consumer + 1A post-industrial) Credit 5.1 Local/RegIonal Materials, 20% Manufactured Regionally 1 Credit 5.2 Local/RegIonal Materials, of 20% Above, 50% Extracted Regionally 1 Credit 6 RapIdly Renewable Materials 1 Credit 7 Certified Wood Prereq I Minimum IAQ Performance Required Prereq 2 Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control Required Credit 1 Carbon Dioxide (CO2 ) Monitoring 1 Credit 2 Increase Ventilation Effectiveness I Credit 3.1 ConstructIon IAQ Management Plan, During Construction I Credit 3.2 Construction IAQ Management Plan, Flushout/Testing I Credit 4.1 Low-EmItting Materials, Adhesives & Sealants I Credit 4.2 Low-EmittIng Materials, Paints I Credit 4.3 Low-Emitting Materials, Carpets 1 Credit 4.4 Low-Emitting Materials, Composite Wood I Credit 5 Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control I Credit 6.1 Controllability of Systems, Perimeter I Credit 6.2 ControllabilIty of Systems, Non-Perimeter I Credit 7.1 Thermal Comfort, Comply with ASHRAE 55-1992 1 Credit 7.2 Thermal Comfort, Permanent Monitoring System . I CaGI LEED' eckIist age 3 1 Credit 8.1 Daylight & Views, Daylight 75% of Spaces i credit 8.2 Daylight & Views, Views for 90% of Spaces I Yes 7 No N Credit 1.1 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title 1 N Credit 1.2 InnovatIon In Design: Provide Specific Title . N Credit 1.3 InnovatIon in Design: Provide Specific Title N Credit 1.4 Innovation In Design: Provide Specific Title N Credit 2 LEEDTM Accredited Professional 1 Yes 7 No I •i 4 J Points: Certified 26-32 points Silver 33-38 points Gold 39-51 points Platinum 52-69 points CaGBC LEED BC Checklist Page 4 •3r±Jl1II1cI TflT1TE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: November 5, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: VP/077/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: CoW SUBJECT: Variance Permit 22017 124 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Development Variance Permit application VP/077/07 has been received to vary the RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone rear yard setback requirement on proposed Lot 4. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit VP/077/07 be approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/077/07 respecting property located at 22017 124 Avenue. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Barbara L Davison Owner: Kerry 0 Davison Barbara L Davison Legal Description: Lot: 10, D.L.: 395, Plan: BCP10I90 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Proposed: No Change Zoning: Existing: RS-lb (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) Proposed: No Change 1102 b) Project Description: Single Family Residential RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-i. (One Family Urban Residential) Park Single Family Residential RS-Ib (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Urban Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 1240 Avenue and Isaac Crescent Full Urban 0.347 HA SD/077/07 To vary the rear yard setback on proposed Lot 4 from 6 m to 2.52 m to permit retention of the existing carport at rear of dwelling. Surrounding Uses North: Use: Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Access: Servicing: Lot Size: Companion Applications: Requested Variance: Application SD/077/07 proposes to subdivide the property located at 22017 124 Ave into 4 lots, each having a minimum lot size of 557 m 2. Each of the proposed lots meets the minimum lot width, lot depth and lot area requirements of the zone. The surrounding area has previously been subdivided into RS-lb lots. It is proposed that the existing house with attached carport on proposed Lot 4 is to temporarily remain during this phase of the subdivision. The proposed subdivision plan is attached as Appendix B. The final phase of the subdivision (at a later date) will involve removal of this house as it sits on the last 3 fully serviced lots on Isaac Crescent. When this final subdivision occurs, the Approving Officer will require through the PLA that the variance for rear yard setback on the subject property be released which will result in normal rear yard setbacks on all lots. c) Planning Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for residential development, and a Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. Such flexibility can allow an applicant to sensitively fit a project to a site or to preserve worthy structures. -2- Requested Variance to the District of Manle Ridge Zoning Bylaw: The applicant is requesting that Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw be varied as follows: 1. Part 6, Section 601 C. (9) (c) (i) of the RS-lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)) zone of the Zoning Bylaw to reduce the rear yard setback from 6 metres to 2.52 metres on proposed Lot 4. The attached carport at the rear of the existing house on the subject property extends into the new rear yard setback. Supporting this variance to reduce the rear yard setback will allow the owner to retain and have use of the carport while they occupy the existing house. The house and carport will be torn down at a later date in order to complete the final stage of the subdivision which will create 3 additional lots on proposed Lot 4. This variance will be removed as part of the approval process for the future subdivision. d) Alternatives: If this application is not approved the applicant would have to demolish the carport. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that Development Variance Permit VP/077/07 be approved. Prepared by- Erika Syvokas Planning Technician Approved by: J e Pickering, MCP, MCIP DirPI Approved by ,Ø'ank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Developmer)t Services Concurrence:/ J.L. (Jim) Rule I Chief Administrative Officer ES/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Subdivison Plan Appendix C- Legal Survey Showing Existing Buildings -3- I jcn J cn I 0 -LI I01I IC) 0 —s m C.) 21903 21911 —s —s I I (D 1 21902 I. Jjc) Co Fn •13 —s cc - /N 0 / Co 21927 C) -Ab.. 01 . I 21951 —5 01 CD 21965 W . - -U 21979 — o co ZogZ o -sCo 21995 C, rn 0 22011 —s 01 0 -4 I IP81$16 22037 01 Ol U1 OD C) 22045 co p.) -U —s 01 _ Co 01 - m I- -D —s 01 co 01 j21904 L 21908 () cc Co 21905 01 21912 cc 21913 21916 21919 0 21927 I 21936 — -U I -4 21935 to I 21950 N.)-.4 -4 cn I CO 21943 1 co 21966 10cc I -U -5 o (/) —s cc g- o CD —s — o 22017 CD 22023 r 22036 22035 22044 N.) cc 22047 r 22050 22059 22056 —s 22069 1 cc 22062 oiD — N.) 22075 22070 N.) —s a) C) -.4 22081 22078 Cn —s 22087 22084 N.) — I 22051 -u -u > -4 ;ti -J . Co C) 22061 Co 22071 Na 22081 - SUBDIWSION PLAN OF LOT 10 DISTRICT LOT 395 GROUP 1 NEW V,fSTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN BCP10190 8.C.C.S. 920.028 0 25 50 SCALE 1: 500 o.srs mt wmc 'N7EA 7W SURY AREA NO. 36 (MAPLE RIDGE) NAD8J(CSPS) DOS PLAN 900AN NOW2WATM. J-L.ft€t OLSTANS (xPT ONEff Om"SE Norm is curr ow OiSTM MA Ips ow,C-LEIfl TISTAPS NV COgAED VACisO 09890081 LEtND 6 5 ow wAftva A8€ UisI(D FWI ossmAnams aerozm m(nc cc*,,wa a.00tI.owrs 84o9907 MD 8459970 fwso PtAaD 9040155 CONINO. maNumENI, • 0 0040119 LOAD PIUS • 0 09740119 8114 POST No 5950119 ?ECIAOOS w* IE ov.i?s to ' 8 wOJLNr 0MW SANSOS PUN Pl0lO0 9499484 9 INN 04M004 I 2 ADDRESS PLAN U,7762 CCCVPATSW A.Ol8C L8 SAC 94140 17Sf ACT ____________ 2007 49990MM 11fl098 F59 SAC 044911 RIDGE • • 59ANT 8111704 • A 9477sf 91718*4 & 174987w. • PD caLwa.4 • 7WT 75414 WAS MWMNr Al 4440 P(890449tr 170NNMlDD 1781 SURWY fW4l1D IT 71459148. AIM 71941 881 57401(14* PLAN AVAC CCT - IWO P11W 57.94(1 INS 7s GO 7181 __at 1741 11 200.... 7781 PLAN 140 CIILD AND 0(0400 AND 1781 OACOltGT 9104 LN8 __....._... BeON 419 DAY G 0441, 2007 DRAFT LLJ 7 PlAN — - - - PLAN BCP______________ 091057110 8 flAC LAND 77790 117711 41 MW PISDOVSISR, IC 04 2007 941747714W MGT0AE DAMN 09 #094IPCAL 4.45,59 GOIW 0904 I AS$00471! PNGTI4L LAND 5749IE7w5 • - 90088 - 8475 A000AC AC. 904 394 7W 994-513-8811 PAW 675-573-235 P51 1 03585 bND 3599-TI 4 .3 2 I RM RCPIOIDO § IS4IC CRESCENT IMS PLAN LIES P17)1/N Thit GREA 7F.R VANCC4MR REQCWAL DIsTRIcT S 4 -. J------------------47jW_ 8458897 8048925 124th AVENUE — — -. —. — — — — — 4417899254 S,otdNp ADDRESS 099149A77GO 8. C LAND SURWrtWS CER71F7C4 7E OF LOCA 1CW SSIOVJNO IMPROWMENTS ON LOT 4 DISTRICT LOT 395 Q'?WP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN BCP____ 0 25 50 SCALE 1 : 500 DISTANCES ARE ME7RIC Lot di,wnsion, and dowunces occothng to Plan 9'P10190 71* — Mr £..0..t1... pt.pc id to •1S — we IF —. eftat Ph. — — * C d tY C dwonwic me . , - ffi — IIiggw,. id fbw u, — b ffi. 1 p . 71* itICF hI . p' £, Al ,* , - B& daww~* 60 aha& p.1 .*.1 I.. 01 am— 1S44c CRESCE- 9 9.08 PLAN _ 9.08 10 SRW 3 PLAN LMP27752 4.c 4 PLAN 8 °oo. AMAW #17 2STORD Z18 14.25 PORT 1574 — PLAN LMP26766 21 3 1 124th CERMED CCRECT 7)1/S 5th DAY Q MAY 2007 DRAFT ac.L.s GIANT BUILAN This docum.',t is not idis Lmi.hs ac1gh,ay s1ç,i.d and aea/.d. A VENUE CIWC ADDRESS: 22017 124th AVENUE MAPLE RIDGE, B.C. 0Y( A?C AA1ES PRES9CWAL LAND SURWMM 4 - 19069 — 947)1 AENVE 5URREV 8.0 V4N 354 1EL. 604-513-9611 FAX 604-513-2202 ALE: 03585 OWC: 3585—CE? I - IJJU1;lI,IeI Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: November 14, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: E02-616-001 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W Kanaka Way Traffic Safety Improvements EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Over the past number of months, District staff have been working with the School District, a developer and residents to enhance safety through traffic calming measures along Kanaka Way. Pedestrian walkway improvements have been made along Kanaka Creek Elementary School. Enhanced safety improvements are recommended to encourage vehicles to slow down at two intersections: Kanaka Way at Gilker Hill Road and Kanaka Way at 234A Street. The work involves the installation of plastic delineators to extend the curbs at these intersections. Installing the work in 2007 will allow staff to initiate a traffic calming program this year along River Road (which is the next highest priority). However, Council approval for funding to install the improvements is required. This requires a reallocation of existing approved funding - as requested in this report. RECOMMENDATION: THAT the Financial Plan be amended to reallocate funding as detailed in the report titled Kanaka Way Traffic Safety Improvements" dated November 14, 2007. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Over the past few months, as part of the 2007 Safer City program, District staff have been working with the School District, a developer and residents to enhance safety through traffic calming measures along Kanaka Way. In particular, the issues raised have been speeding along the section of Kanaka Way by the school. Speed and field surveys were conducted by Speed Watch and have identified that speed and driver behavior is an issue. The installation of curb extensions with the use of delineators will enhance safety and encourage motorists to reduce speeds in this area. ICBC has agreed to assist with a contribution of funds. 1103 b) Desired Outcomes: To obtain Council approval to install curb extension delineators by Kanaka Creek Elementary School. C) Cftizen/Customer Implications: The improvements are intended to improve pedestrian and road safety for all road users. Interdepartmental Implications: The improvements are being coordinated with Operations Department staff. Business Plan/Financial Implications: The current traffic calming funds for 2007 have been invested on the improvements at Tamarack at 105 Avenue. However, an opportunity exists to improve safety along a section of Kanaka Way in advance of the 2008 Business Plan as ICBC has indicated that they are willing to partner with some funding. In total, the work can be funded by the following: Project 1468 was completed under budget and approximately $25,000 is proposed to be transferred. Proposed funding and reallocation ICBC funding $ 2,000 LTC 1468 $ 23,000 Total $ 25,000 CONCLUSIONS: Safety improvements have been identified for Kanaka Way by Kanaka Creek Elementary School that will benefit pedestrians and road users in the area. Council approval for funding is requested. Submitted by PhD., PEng. Financial review by: Trevôr Thompson, CGA Mtnicipal Engineer Manager, Financial Planning Approved b4rank Quinn, MBA, PEng. Services J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AW/mi Safer Mak Kanaka Way__________ k j p :ii prjJ1;lImJeJ Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: November 9, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request has been received from the Ridge Meadows Community Festival Society to use municipal streets for the annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park on Saturday December 1, 2007. Authorization from Council is required in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By - law 3136-1982" to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge. RECOMMENDATION: THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park on Saturday December 1, 2007, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule A' attached to the staff report dated November 9, 2007 are met. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society is requesting permission to use municipal streets on Saturday December 1, 2007 for their annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park. The event will take place on 224 Street and would require the following road closures: • 223 Street and 224 Street between Selkirk Avenue and Dewdney Trunk Road inclusive; • Haney Place road including Fraser Street to Dewdney Trunk Road. The event is scheduled from 5:30 PM to 8:00 PM. However, the event organizer will begin setting up at 2:00 PM, closing Haney Place road and Fraser Street for volunteer's setup. All other roads will be closed at 4:00 PM for parade staging. It is anticipated that all the streets will be restored by 9:00 PM. A map showing the location is attached. 1104 Strategic Plan: Permitting of Maple Ridge street events promotes community development and often highlights Maple Ridge's natural and built features. Citizen/Customer Implications: Permission to use municipal streets may cause some delays and inconveniences to other road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the event organizers. In addition, the organizers will be distributing an information letter to affected businesses and residents. Interdepartmental Implications: The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP, for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service). Business Plan Implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices. g Alternatives: The District could refuse to permit the event to occur. In this event, the organizer would have to cancel the event. CONCLUSIONS: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events and activities. Permission is requested for the annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park and condi ions of Schedule A' are attached. Submitted by:. Anth r7bd, PhD., P.Eng. Approved7-~,M: rank Quinn, MBA,,PI5. flc WojKs vbevelopment Services Concurrence: /i. L. (Jim) Oule / Chief Administrative Officer Schedule 'A' To Council Memorandum Dated November 9, 2007 Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park Condition of Approval Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers: provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the R.C.M.P., and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District); notify local Fire Department, and Ambulance Services of the event; make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date); notify surrounding businesses of pending road closures, by letter provided by the District of Maple Ridge on behalf of the organizer; must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times; hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any way connected with the event; obtain any required permits from the Maple Ridge Parks & Leisure .Services Department for park facility use if required; and obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District." Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; and refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the District. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw permission to use municipal streets for this and future events should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements. Chief Administrative Officer MAPLE RIDGE CHRISTMAS FESTIVAL SOCI 11925HaneyPlace,MapleRidge BC. V2X 6G2 Mathew U. Distiict of Maple Ridge Engineering Department 11995 Haney Place, ,.jL o\ Maple Ridge BC V2X6A9 October 30, 2007 Good day Mr Li; The information below is a copy of the letter that was hand delivered to the RCMP for approval on October 9 regarding the Santa C!aus Parade and Christmas in the Park. As of this date I have not received any communication from them despite several phone calls. I do not want to delay this letter being submitted for approval by the city any further. This letter is to notify you that the Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society will be hosting the annual Santa Claus Parade on Saturday December 1, 2007. I have included a map with this letter for your approval in order to proceed to the engineering department. Road closures for the parade route require barricades in the core area. The following streets will be closed from 2:00 to 8:30pm. Fraser Street at Dewdney Trunk Rd. to Haney Place in Memorial Peace Park. Haney Place, including underground parking access to and from the Park. is also closed from 2:00 to 8:30pm. 223rd will be closed between Selkirk and Dewdney Trunk Rd from 4:00 to 8:30pm. 119 Avenue will be closed from 4:00 to 5:30pm at 223rd street. 119 Avenue will be closed from 5:30 to 8:30pm between 223rd and 224th street. The Lanes between 222 nd and 223 w will be closed at 223 rd only, from 4:00 to 8:30pm. The Lanes between 223 rd and 224" will be closed at 223 w only, from 4:00 to 8:30pm. The lanes between 223 w anu 124th will be closed completely between 5:30 and 8:30pm. 220 between Dewdney Trunk and Selkirk will be closed from 5:30 to 8:30pm. McIntosh will be closed from 5:30 to 8:30pm between 223rd and 224 th street. There will be no parking along McIntosh or 119th Ave between 223 w and 220 from 5:00 to 8:30pm. We apologize for any inconvenience this road closure may cause, and thank you for your co- operation. If you have any questions please contact Art Solomon at 604-219-9027. Sincerely Art Solomon Chair Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society lHi )ighted barricades -. 00 lC') 00 lane IL-I lane IWi 1(1). Il LLI______ McIntosh Ave Parked vehicles may exit undergrouna parking only via lane across exit McIntosh prior to 6:00 pm ring road closed at 14.00 h tane lane - 4 Ring road H Ii underar E _______________ I parking 119_th_Avente4 1 CD l-'araae I a, - (I) DmarshaInt I 00 Zellers Parking CN lane c'1 lane I 1 (0 00 Red lines indicate barricades I . Light green is parade route Selkirk Avenue Purple line is parade Fi4MS I lane marshal / registration tent LI Lougheed highway All Park entrances and exits closed at 2:00 pm I J c9j I I I I 5PORT INSURANCE MARKETING LTD. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE AS HEREIN DESCRIBED HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED BELOW AND ARE IN FORCE AT THE DATE HEREOF: THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF: CORP. OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, CITY OF PITT MEADOWS, RIDGE MEADOWS PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES COMMISSION, SCHOOL DISTRICT 42 ABOVE ARE ADDED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED, BUT SOLELY WITH RESPECT TO THE LIABILITY WHICH ARISES OUT OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE NAMED +NSURED NAME OF INSURED CHRISTMAS FESTIVAL SOCIETY do 2119 Berry Ave. LOCATION AND OPERATIONS TO WHICH ThuiIF1CATEAPFLTES 224TH STREET & MEMORIAL PEACE PARK, MAPLE RIDGE, BC PARADE & CELEBRATION" DECEMBER 1, 2007 TO WHOM NOTICE WILL BE MAILED IF SUCH INSURANCE IS CANCELLED OR IS CHANGED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AFFECT THIS CERTIFICATE kre—m— ium 200.00 Fee: 25.00 Total: 225.00 KIND OF POLICY POLICY NO. INSURERS LIMIT OF LIABILITY GENERAL LIABILITY AS1 111 AVIVA INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA $5,000,000.00 INCLUSIVE LIMIT BODILY INJURY! PROPERTY DAMAGE *DEDUCTIBLE $500.00 POLICY EXTENSIONS CROSS LIABILITY CLAUSE INCLUDED *SUBJECT TO 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OR MATERIAL CHANGE THE INSURANCE AFFORDED IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF THE APPLICABLE POLICY. October 12, 2007 ALL SPORT INSURANCE MARKETiNG LTD. 07/10 AUTHORIZD REPRESENTATIVE M1730 507, 1367 West Broadway, Vancouver, BC V61-1 4A9 1ns7 TEL (604) 737-3018 FAX (604) 737-3076 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: November 13, 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: HOLDING TANK BYLAW FOR WALDUN GROUP, 9393 - 2877H STREET EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Wa/dun Group in the Ruskin Industrial Area is in the process of constructing an addition to the Office. A need for improved sanitary servicing has been identified. There are no Municipal sanitary services in the area. The existing land area is not sufficient for a septic system. The recommended alternative is a holding tank which is a solution accepted previously in the Municipality. RECOMMENDATION(S): That Bylaw No. 6525-2007 be read a first and second time and that the rules of order be waived and Bylaw No. 6525-2007 be read a third time. DISCUSSION: The Wa/dun Group operates in the Ruskin Industrial Area and provides employment to local residents. Earlier a Building Permit was issued to permit the addition to the existing Office, located at 9393 - 287th Street. Through the course of this process, the need to upgrade the sanitary servicing was identified. During construction it was determined that the existing septic system would not be sufficient. There is no Municipal Sanitary Servicing in the area. The cost of bringing sewer servicing to Ruskin is prohibitive. The size of the site is such that there is not adequate land area for a septic system. On three occasions in the past, the Municipality has accepted holding tank bylaws in support of already existing operations. The Albion School, J.P. Riding Stables and Best Quality Cedar operated with holding tanks. A similar solution is proposed for the Wa/dun Group. Bylaw No. 6525-2007 details the conditions and requirements attached to a holding tank approval. Prepared by: P.M. (Pieter) Den Uyl, RBO na pection Services 47Z s ) - Approvec/by: Frank Quinn, P.Eng., PMP V GM: Public Works velopment Services Concurrence: /6hief L. (Jim) RuIe Administrative Officer id 1105 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6525-2007 A Bylaw regulating the construction of, connection to and use of holding tank at Waldun Group, 9393 - 287th Street WHEREAS Section 550 of the Local Government Act allows Council, by Bylaw to require persons to use a waste disposal services. The Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: Citation This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Holding Tank (Waldun Group, 9393 - 287th Street) Bylaw No. 6525 - 2007". Interpretation and Application 1) In this Bylaw the following definitions shall apply: "Building Drain" shall mean that part of the lowest horizontal piping that conducts sewage, clear or grey water waste or storm water to a building sewer or holding tank; "Corporation" shall mean the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge; "Council" shall mean the Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge; "Director" shall mean the Director of Engineering Operations or his authorized representative; "Waldun Group" means the lands and all buildings and structures servicing the premises located at 9393 - 287th Street, Maple Ridge. "Holding Tank" shall mean a tank or series of tanks intended to store all domestic sewage conveyed by a building sewer or building drain until the sewage can be transported by tanker to an approved disposal location; "Unsanitary Condition" shall mean the seepage, leakage, overflow or escape of sewage from a holding tank; "Inspector" shall mean the Manager of Inspection Services appointed from time to time by the Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge and includes any authorized representative; "Lands" shall mean: PcI "A", DL 438, Group 1, LMP 7504, NWD "Natural Outlet" shall mean any outlet into a watercourse, pond, ditch, lake or other body or surface of water or groundwater; "Owner" shall mean the registered owner of an estate in fee simple of the lands; TMPersonu shall mean any individual, firm, company, association, society, corporation or group; "Property Comminuted Garbage" shall mean the wastes from the preparation, cooking and dispensing of food that have been shredded to such a degree that all particles will be carried freely under the flow conditions normally prevailing in public sewers, with no particle greater than one-quarter (1/4) inch (6mm) in any dimension; I' 'sewage" shall mean any liquid waste containing animal or vegetable matter in suspension or solution and may include liquids containing chemicals in solution; 'Slug" shall mean any discharge of water, sewage or industrial waste which in concentration of any given constituent or in quantity of flow exceeds for any period of duration longer than fifteen (15) minutes more than five (5) times the average twenty- four (24) hour concentration of flows during normal operation; "Standard Methods" means the current edition of 'Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Sewerage' published by the American Public Health Association; "Storm Drainage System' shall mean a drainage system or part of a drainage system that conveys only storm water or clear water waste; "Wastes" means matter discarded or not wanted and may also mean substances including water which are permitted to escape or which escape accidentally; "Watercourse" shall mean a channel in which a flow of water occurs, either continuously or intermittently. 2) This By-law applies to the construction, installation, connection to, use of and maintenance of holding tanks at Waldun Group, 9793 - 287th Street. 3. Requirement for Disposal Services 1) Except as hereinafter provided, the requirements of the Maple Ridge Sanitary Sewer Regulation By-law No. 691 -1961 as amended from time to time shall apply. 4. Regulations of Holding Tanks The owner shall construct, install and connect to or cause to be constructed, installed and connected to each building situated on the land a separate and independent holding tank. The holding tank shall be constructed and installed and maintained in accordance with the requirements set out in Schedule "A" and "B" attached hereto; A permit fee and security deposit in accordance with the attached Schedule "C" shall be paid for each holding tank at the time of issuance of the building permit; and The owner shall not make connection of roof downspouts, exterior foundation drains, areaway drains or other sources of surface runoff or groundwater to a holding tank or to a building sewer or building drain which is connected directly or indirectly to a holding tank. 5. Holding Tanks The owner or any other person shall not break, damage, destroy, uncover, deface or tamper with or cause or permit to be broken, damaged, destroyed, uncovered, defaced or tampered with any holding tank or any structure, appurtenance or equipment ancillary thereto; The owner and any other person shall not discharge or cause to be discharged or permit to be discharged Into any holding tank any storm water, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff, subsurface drainage, or uncontaminated cooling water; 2 3) The owner or any other person shall not discharge or cause or permit to be discharged into any holding tank any of the prohibited or restricted wastes described in the Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage District Sewer Use By-Law No. 164 as amended from time to time; 4) If waters or wastes are discharged, or proposed to be discharged to the holding tanks, which have deleterious effects upon the holding tanks, processes, equipment, or receiving waters, or which otherwise create a hazard to life or constitute a public nuisance, the Director may: reject the wastes; require pretreatment to an acceptable condition for discharge to the public sewers; require control over the quantities and rates of discharge; or require an equitable payment having regard to the quantity and quality of waste in relation to that from other sources. If the Director permits the pretreatment or equalization of waste flows, the design and installation of the plant and equipment shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director, and subject to the continued requirements of all applicable codes, By-laws and laws. 5) All measurements, tests, and analyses of the characteristics of waters and waste to which reference is made in this By-law shall be determined at the holding tank in accordance with "Standard Methods". Operation of a Holding Tank 1) The owner shall be responsible for operating each approved holding tank in accordance with the requirements of this Bylaw inclusive of Schedules "A" and "B" and all other applicable laws, By-laws and regulations. The Power and Authority of Inspector and Director 1) The Director and Inspector of the Municipality are hereby authorized to enter on any property to ascertain whether the provisions of this By-law are being observed including without limitation, inspecting, observing, measuring, sampling and testing of building drains or holding tanks. Penalties Every person found to be violating any provision of this Bylaw shall be served by the Municipality with written notice stating the nature of the violation and providing a reasonable time limit for the satisfactory correction thereof. The offender shall, within the period of time stated in such notice, permanently cure all violations, or carry out or cause to be done such work as may be required to conform with this By-law in accordance with the notice; Every person who: a) violates any of the provisions of this Bylaw; 3 causes or suffers or permits any act or thing to be done in contravention or in violation of any of the provisions of this Bylaw; or neglects or refrains from doing anything required to be done by any provisions of this Bylaw; shall be deemed to have committed an offence under this Bylaw and on conviction thereof shall be fined in an amount not exceeding $5,000.00. Each day in which such violation shall continue, shall be deemed to constitute a separate offence. All penalties and costs shall be recoverable and enforceable upon summary conviction in the manner provided for under the Offence Act, R.S.B.C. 1979, c. 305 including imprisonment for any time not exceeding 30 days in default of said penalty; and 3) Every person violating any of the provisions of this Bylaw shall become liable to the Municipality for any expenses, loss or damage occasioned the Municipality by reason of sum violation. 9. Default 1) The owner shall dispose of or cause to be disposed of the contents of the holding tank in accordance with the terms of this Bylaw; 2) The owner shall not cause or permit the holding tank or lands or both to become or remain in an unsanitary condition; 3) Where the owner causes or permits the holding tank or lands to become or remain in an unsanitary condition or otherwise fails to comply with this Bylaw, the Municipality shall, by its servants, agents or contractors, clean up the holding tank located on the lands and may remove the sewage; 4) The owner of the lands shall be liable for the costs and expenses incurred by the Municipality in undertaking any work described herein. If the owner fails to pay for the work or service: the Municipality may call for and receive the funds secured by the security deposit and use them to reimburse the Municipality for the costs and expenses incurred. If • the said monies are not sufficient to fully reimburse the Municipality, the owner will pay any deficiency to the Municipality; or the costs and expenses incurred by the Municipality shall become a charge or lien on the lands and shall be collected in the same manner with the like remedies as ordinary taxes on land and improvements. 5) If the Municipality uses part or all of the security deposit pursuant to Section 9.4 (a), the owner will forthwith on demand by the Municipality reinstate the security deposit to the original amount; 6) A charge specified in this Bylaw that is due and payable by December 31 and unpaid on that date shall be deemed to be taxes in arrears and shall promptly be so entered on the tax roll. .4 4 Validity The invalidity of any section, clause, sentence, or provision of this Bylaw shall not affect the validity of any other part of this Bylaw, which can be given effect without such invalid part or parts. Schedules Schedules A, B and C are attached to and form part of this Bylaw. READ a first time the day of , 200 READ a second time the day of , 200 READ a third time the day of , 200. RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of , 200 MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER 5 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE HOLDING TANK (WALDUN GROUP, 9393 - 287th STREET) BYLAW NO. 6525 - 2007 SCHEDULE A Sewage Holding Tanks - General Requirements The sewage holding tank system shall be for storage only and will receive all the sewage generated by the premises. The owner shall be responsible for installing the holding tank and bearing all costs and expenses incidental to the installation and maintenance. The owner shall indemnify the Municipality from any loss or damage that may directly or indirectly be occasioned by the installation, operation and maintenance of the holding tank. The owner and occupier of the land who intends to install a holding tank system shall submit a plan or plans of his proposed system to the Municipality for approval before installation. The plan(s) shall be in such detail as to be acceptable to the Municipality. For holding tanks located more than 1 metre from the building, a permit shall be obtained from the Health Unit as required by the B.C. Sewage Disposal Regulations. This permit shall accompany the plan submissions to the Municipality. The owner or occupier shall obtain a haulage contract with a contractor. The haulage contract shall provide for pumping and hauling the contents of the holding tank system and such a contract must be maintained at all times. The Municipality must approve its wording. No owner or occupier shall modify, expand or otherwise alter his holding tank system without the prior approval of the Municipality as set out in Clause 2 above. No owner or occupier shall enter into a new haulage contract or modify an existing one without the prior approval of the Municipality as set out in Clause 3 above. The contractor shall guarantee that he can continuously service the installation. Road accessibility, provision for back-up tanker truck, total contract workload and other pertinent factors shall be taken into account when providing the guarantee. The contractor submitting the service contract shall submit its truck(s) for Inspection at the request of the Director. The contractor shall discharge the sewage pumped out of the holding tanks at a location approved by the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District. The contractor shall not mix any septic tank contents or other wastes with holding tank sewage, nor shall the contractor discharge anything but holding tank sewage at the approved discharge point. Upon each visit to the approved discharge point, the contractor shall deposit with the Municipality a memo including the date and the volume collected. The holding tank shall be designed such that full-time use of the building on the property will require a pump out frequency of once every three days (based on the B.C. Sewage Disposal Regulations pursuant to the Health Act). If water conservation methods such as spring loaded taps, reduced water flush toilets, etc. are utilized, then this frequency of pump out may be reduced. However, the holding tank shall be pumped out more frequently as required to prevent the sewage from reaching the high level elevation in the holding tank. Prior to any holding tank being constructed or installed on the lands, a Restrictive Covenant shall be registered against title to the lands in accordance with Section 215 of the Land Title Act. The Restrictive Covenant shall require the owner to use the lands and the holding tank in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of the By-law. 7 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE HOLDING TANK (WALDUN GROUP, 9393 - 287m STREET) BYLAW NO. 6525 - 2007 SCHEDULE B Sewage Holding Tanks - Technical Requirements 1. Any by-pass of the holding tank system is prohibited and periodic inspections may be made by the Municipality's Inspector to monitor this. 2. All plans submitted showing site locations, tank details, electrical details, material specifications, trenching and backfihling techniques, etc. shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Engineer registered in the Province of British Columbia. 3. The holding tank shall be constructed or reinforced fiberglass or concrete and the design shall be submitted for the approval of the Inspector of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge. 4. All tanks to be partially or completely installed below grade must have a support slab designed to prevent the tank from floating or any other movement. 5. The tanks shape shall allow complete and easy removal of all liquid and sludge contents therein. A V-shaped or rounded bottom is required with a minimum 1.5% slope from end to end down to the discharge point. 6. The tank shall have its own separate vent "goose necked., screened, and in a location where problems would not be anticipated from any foul odors. The opening shall be three (3) metres above the highest ground elevation found within one (1) metre of the tank. The access manholes to the tank shall be sealed. 7. Tank capacity shall be based on the proposed pumping frequency plus a factor of safety. The minimum volume allowed will be 8,500 litres. Appendix 1 of Schedule 2 of the Sewage Disposal Regulation should be utilized to arrive at the minimum daily sewage flow. The volume will then be calculated for three days flow. A factor of safety of 50% shall then be added. 8. Two or more prefabricated tanks installed in a series may be used to accommodate the capacity required. These must be connected invert to invert with a continuous slope from the end accepting sewage to the end equipped with the discharge or pump out point. Any aeration equipment will be located to keep the connection pipe clear of any sludge buildup. 9. An aeration system may be required and its purpose is to: maintain oxygen in the system, thus reducing odors; circulate the effluent to eliminate freezing; and eliminate sludge buildup on the bottom or corners of the tank. 10. The operation of the tank shall be monitored from a separately mounted weathertight panel. The panel will consist of: a) a timer - to control the switching of the aeration system if an aeration system is deemed necessary; b) an indicator panel showing three lights. The green light will indicate the system is operating correctly. The orange or amber light will indicate the tank is ready to pump; this would be at the 2/3rds full level. A liquid level float switch attached within the tank will activate the amber light. A red light will indicate the system is overloaded. A liquid level float switch will also activate this light and it will allow at least enough residual volume to drain the plumbing in the household. In addition once this level is reached an electrically operated solenoid valve will cut off the water service to the building except for that water service required to maintain fire protection. This solenoid valve will only operate in a "lower on" mode and thereby avoid a water shutoff in the event of a power failure. When the red light is activated an audible signal will be heard within the dwelling. This audible signal will remain on until it is turned off at the control panel. The siting of the tank or the pump out pipe for a buried tank must be located within a paved area with easy access from the road. If the grade from the road allowance to the pump out location is greater than 5% then a covered walkway arrangement must be provided. A roof may be necessary to keep snow buildup from the pump out pipe. No provision for an overflow pipe is permitted. Should an overflow of the holding tank occur, it should be designed so that an obvious and immediate problem is created in the building and/or on the surface of the ground at the tank area. All tank installations shall require leakage testing. This will consist of filling the tank with water to within three centimetres of the rim of the access manhole. This will be left for a minimum of 24 hours. The water level will be brought up to within three centimetres of the rim of the access manhole once again. An inspection will be carried out a minimum of 24 hours later and no drop in the water level will be permitted. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE HO WING TANK (WALDUN GROUP, 9393 - 287th STREET) BYLAW NO. 6525 - 2007 SCHEDULE C Permit Fee For holding tank permit Permit Fee - $2,500.00 Security Deposit Cash or an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit in the amount of $10,000.00 issued by one of the following financial institutions: Bank of British Columbia Bank of Montreal Bank of Nova Scotia Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce Royal Bank of Canada Toronto Dominion Bank Security Pacific Bank of Canada Maple Ridge Community Credit Union Vancouver City Savings Credit Union Westminster Credit Union B.C. Central Credit Union The credit document should include the following provisions: - The credit shall be unconditional and irrevocable. Partial drawings are to be permitted. Payment is to be made upon presentation by the District of a written demand for payment, without the issuer enquiring whether the District has a right to such payment. The credit must be valid for a period of not less than one (1) year and must include an automatic renewal provision with the following effects: "It is a condition of the Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit that it shall be deemed to be automatically extended without amendment for a further one (1) year period from the present or any further expiration date hereof, unless at least thirty (30) days prior to the present or any future expiration date, the issuer notifies the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in writing by registered mail, that it does not elect to consider this Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit to be renewable for any additional period." The security deposit shall be held so long as the holding tanks exist. 10 District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: November 9. 2007 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT Disbursements for the month ended October 31, 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council has authorized all voucher payments to be approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor, together with the Director of Finance. Council authorizes the vouchers for the following period through Council resolution. The disbursement summary for the past period is attached for your information. Expenditure details are available to any Council member for review in the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION: That the "disbursements as listed below for the month ended October 31, 2007 now be approved" GENERAL $ 6,143,841 PAYROLL $ 1,114,322 PURCHASE CARD $ 83.741 $ 7.341.904 DISCUSSION: Background Context: The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan. Community Communications: The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial disbursements. 1131 C) Business Plan / Financial Implications: Emergency Communications dispatch levy fourth quarter $ 253.621 GV Water District water consumption June 27 - July 31 $ 580,706 Greater Vancouver Regional District debt payment $ 1,798,998 d) Policy Implications: Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice. CONCLUSIONS: The disbursements for the month ended October 31, 2007 have been reviewed and are in order. /YL29 Prepared by: G'Ann Rygg Accounting Clerk II Approved by: Trevor Thompson, CGA Manager of Financial Planning 1. Approved by: paLl 1BBA, CGA GM - Corporate & Firian al Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chiei Administrative Officer gmr CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - PERIOD 10, 2007 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT BC Hydro Hydro charges Oct BC SPCA Contract Sept Dog license commission Aug Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd Maintenance: Audio PED signals Banners Fairgrounds Firehall Hammond Community Centre Leisure Centre MR Spray Park Memorial Park Municipal Hall Operations Poles & conduit Pumpstations Randy Herman Building RCM P Stolen underground wire replaced Street lights Vandalism repairs Whonnock Lake Bynett Construction Services Community Safety Building IT department expansion CUPE Local 622 Dues - pay periods 07/20 & 07/21 chevron Canada Ltd Fuel Day Advertising Group Inc. Recruitment Downtown Maple Ridge Business BIA collections Emco Limited Maintenance: Courthouse Harris Road Pool Leisure Centre Library Municipal Hall Operations PM Athletic Park PM Rec Centre RCMP Emergency Communications Dispatch levy - fourth quarter Golder & Associates Spillsbury Street slope stabilization design 284th Street slope failure remediation design Whonnock Lake dam design Gr Vanc Sewerage & Drainage Supplementary assesment refund 2002 Greater Vanc Water District Supplementary assessment refund 2002 Water consumption June 27 - July 31/07 Greater Vancouver Regional Dis Debt payment Water sample analysis Mosquito control program Imperial Paving 2007 Paving program Jacks Automotive & Welding Fire Dept equipment repairs JLK Projects Ltd Randy Herman Community Safety Building Manulife Financial Employee benefits premiums viaple Ridge Historical Society Quarterly fee for service payment Metro Motors Ltd Ford F350 with dump body Municipal Pension Plan BC Pension remittance 21.054 759 568 1.579 156 2.472 218 2,671 3.293 997 393 439 4.469 15.978 1.089 973 11.812 3.209 249 151 39,857 13.405 217 82 15.729 93 1,314 535 295 451 164 1.846 141 23.788 122.551 580,706 1,798,998 625 24320 AMOUNT 73.145 21,813 50,716 53,262 17,228 99,932 15,646 75,004 18,880 253.621 25,775 46,952 703,257 1,823,943 141,597 15,281 18,150 95,381 17,380 53,797 214,129 Now Solutions Payroll software annual license 37.267 Pacific Surrey Construction Roadside mowing 20.288 Professional Mechanical Ltd Maintenance: Hammond Community Centre 540 Leisure Centre 10,346 Library 2,019 MRSPCA 117 Municipal Hall 1.400 Operation Centre 845 Randy Herman Building 1.265 Whonnock Lake Centre 609 17,141 Receiver General For Canada Employer/Employee remit PP07/20 & 07/21 383,805 MRMH GST 3.064 386,869 RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ice rental Aug 49,715 Ice rental Sept 51,689 Curling rink operating expenses Aug 5.787 107,191 Ridge Meadow Comm Arts Council Art Centre grant Nov 36.870 Program revenue Aug 25.878 62,748 Ridge Meadows Seniors Society Quarterly operating grant Oct - Dec 36.450 Facility rental 15 36,465 Ridgemeadows Recycling Society Monthly contract for recycling Oct 72,603 Weekly recycling 206 Litter pick-up contract 1.848 74,657 Scottish Line Painting Ltd Pavement marking maintenance 2007 40,441 Symphony Development Corp Security refund 620,266 Terasen Gas Gas Oct 17,956 Ultra-Tech Cleaning System Ltd Maintenance Oct: Firehalls 1.129 Leisure Centre 684 Library 5.961 Municipal Hall 3,955 Operations Centre 852 Randy Herman Building 4.076 RCMP 3.347 20,004 Viam Holdings Ltd Tax refund 51,178 Warrington PCI Management Tower expenses Sept 44,364 Workers Compensation Board BC Employer/Employee remittance 3rd qtr 2007 59,384 Disbursements In Excess $15,000 5,431,110 Disbursements Under $15,000 712,731 Total Payee Disbursements 6,143,841 Payroll PP 07/2 1 & 07/22 1,114,322 Purchase Cards - Payment 83,741 TOTAL PERIOD 10 2007 DISBURSEMENTS 7,341,904 .Accourmng.AP Remttances Dsbursements)\2OO7\jMonthIy Counci Report 2007uIsIOCT07 41 * ELVA; :1t T11 Deep Roots Greater He,ghts District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: 2007 11 13 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATrN: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: Jackson Farm EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council will recall the following July 92007 resolution: That the acquisition of Jackson Farm for park purposes be referred to the Maple Ridge /Pitt Meadows Parks and leisure Services Commission for recommendations." The attached report was recently considered by the Commission and the recommendation endorsed. RECOMMENDATION(S): That consideration of any development proposal for the Jackson Farm be deferred until: completion of the Cemetery Master Plan completion of the 2008 Parks, Recreation and Cultural plan update DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The attached report provides the required background information. CONCLUSIONS: CoUncil has requested that the Commission provide a recommendation on the Jackson Farm in response to requests from some residents for reconsideration of earlier decisions about the site. The alternatives have been considered in light of the new information which is currently available. The recommended alternative acknowledges the Cemetery Master Plan being finalized by the end of this year and h possibiliy of the Parks, Rec,eation and Cultural Plan being updated in 2008. Prepared by: MiIë'Murray I / Development, Parks and Recreation Approved by': Frank Quinn, public Works and Development Services Concurrere: J.L. Iim) Rule / Chief Administrative Officer 1151 AFARKSURE SERVICES SUBJECT: JACKSON FARM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Commission Report The Maple Ridge Official Community Plan (OCP) was adopted on November 14th, 2006. The previous OCP included the Jackson Farm as a future park site. The Jackson Farm was removed as a future park site from the 2006 plan based on the following recommendation in the 2001 Parks, Recreation and Cultural Plan. "...there is a reasonably high standard of recreation park area in Maple Ridge and there are higher priorities for acquisition of open space (e.g. for expansion to Albion Sports Complex, trails, access to waterfront and natural sites). Unless Maple Ridge Council has sufficient resources to acquire the other higher priorities as well as the Jackson Farm and Twin Maples, it should allow one or both of these sites to be acquired for other uses." (p. 86) In June of this year the Friends of the Jackson Farm group came before the Commission presenting their petition signed.by over 3,000 people and requesting that the site be obtained for park purposes. The attached letter from Beryl Eales was also received at that meeting. The matter had not been referred to the Commission by Council at that point and in light of the fact that the OCP had been adopted less than a year previous the letter and petition were redirected to Council. On July 9, 2007 Council considered the letter and petition and adopted the following resolution: "...that the acquisition of Jackson Farm for park purposes be referred to the Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services Commission for recommendations." The Commission subsequently referred the matter to staff with the following direction: ....to report back to the Parks and Leisure Services Commission later in the year with all of the possible alternatives for the Commission's consideration in forming a recommendation to Maple Ridge Council." The alternatives and a recommendation are outlined below. RECOMMENDATION: That Council defer consideration of any development proposal for the Jackson Farm until: completion of the Cemetery Master Plan completion of the 2008 Parks, Recreation and Cultural Plan update. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Although the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Master Plan (the 2001 Master Plan) was adopted with a recommendation to remove the park designation from the Jackson Farm the OCP amendment was Jackson Farm Report #1 not considered until the OCP update was being completed in 2006. The discussion of whether or not to retain the Jackson Farm as a park site in the OCP was prominent in the public hearings related to Council's consideration of the OCP. The Master Plan recommendation noted above was a significant part of Council's deliberations and is based on the extensive recreation park system already available in Maple Ridge as a whole, including the regional and provincial park system, the UBC Malcolm Knapp Research Forest and the Municipal Park system. The active park and trail system planned for the Albion area is also relatively extensive when coupled with Kanaka Creek Regional Park. Of course the OCP also did retain the park designation for a large Municipal level park site at the top of Thomhill which is in relatively close proximity to the Jackson farm site. The 2001 Master Plan recommends a greater emphasis be placed on higher priority park acquisitions like: lands adjacent to watercourses (i.e. Alouette River, Whonnock Creek, etc.), the Fraser River front lands between Kanaka Creek and the Haney Wharf and land to accommodate expansion of the Albion Sports Complex within the overall context of an Albion Flats plan (yet to be developed). It is difficult to justify the acquisition of the Jackson Farm based on the parks already or about to be developed in the immediate vicinity of the Albion area and these higher priorities. In addition an early rough concept plan was prepared for the Jackson Farm site in 2003 by consultants working for the owners. It should be emphasized that this concept plan has not been considered by the Planning Department nor will any proposal for urban development be considered unless the Metro Vancouver green zone designation is removed. A request for removal of the site from the green zone will be considered once the Provincial Government identifies the process by which the Regional District Board can consider such amendments. If it is removed from the green zone and if Council chooses to consider urban development of the site then a detailed review would be undertaken of any development application. The only point in mentioning the early concept plan is to acknowledge that it suggested over 50% of the site could be dedicated as conservation and neighbourhood passive park land at minimal cost to the Municipality. This would likely be the requirement for any residential development proposal. Arguably implementation of an urban development proposal would mean many of the uses contemplated by the Friends of the Jackson Farm would not be possible (i.e. as a natural amphitheatre for concerts or historic farm operation etc.). Other passive park uses would be possible (i.e. children's play areas) depending upon the extent of the dedicated parkiand and how appropriate the topography and access would be. In order to consider the request from the Friends of the Jackson Farm we must ask what has changed since the original decision was made to remove the future park designation in the OCP. Three things have occurred which warrant so'me consideration: A petition signed by a significant number of residents has been submitted. Staff are working on a new Cemetery Master Plan which may introduce another reason to consider the acquisition of part of the Jackson Farm. The Commission has directed that staff complete an update to the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Plan in 2008 Petition With respect to the first item the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Master Plan places a very high priority on securing land for park purposes. The plan suggests a referendum could be held: Jackson Farm Report #2 "...to secure the necessary resources. This publicly approved ability to incur debt to secure land as opportunities arise (up to a preset limit) is one of the most important enhancements to the Parks and Leisure Service system in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows. The referendum authorized fund might be limited to securing high level natural, linear or recreation parks ...." (page iii of the Master Plan Executive Summary) This recommendation has not been implemented to date. The two Municipalities have been able to acquire several important sites identified in the plan without borrowing, in many cases through partnerships with others like the Metro Vancouver Parks Department (i.e. Codd island Wetlands, Coniagas / Alouette River front, Fraser River front in Pitt Meadows). Our collective resources are becoming more limited now and acquiring a site like the Jackson Farm for whatever purpose may well require borrowing to achieve. It is always hard to determine if a petition signed without knowledge of all the other municipal priorities and project costs (and their implications to taxpayers) is representative of all the taxpayers, however, in light of the numbers involved, a referendum of some sort may be appropriate. All of the costs and consequences would need to be clearly defined and communicated to the public. If a referendum were considered care would need to be taken to ensure this specific acquisition is not considered by itself given so many other parkiand acquisition priorities which should also be advanced. A referendum for this site alone might preclude proceeding with .a referendum for acquiring more important sites in future. Cemetery Master Plan Over the past several months parks staff have been working with a consultant on the development of a Cemetery Master Plan. Part of that plan includes a review of the current land area of the two existing cemeteries along with a projection for future land requirements (providing the District chooses to continue providing memorial opportunities for its citizens). A copy of that analysis is attached. The review indicates the need for an additional 2.1 acres (.85 hectares) by 2020 which could be provided to the north of the main Cemetery on Dewdney Trunk Road. Three acres are currently undeveloped in that location but are currently being considered for residential development. Expanding the cemetery in that location would add visibility into the site as well as additional land area. According to the projections more land would be required in another location by 2025. By then the Dewdney Trunk location would be fully utilized. In light of this Council may wish to consider opening a third Cemetery on a portion of the lands occupied by the Jackson Farm sometime after 2020. It should be noted if the land to the north of the current Cemetery is not available opening a new cemetery in another location may be required prior to 2020. A review of the early concept plan for the Jackson Farm (noted above) suggested the lands fronting on Jackson Road could be used for this purpose with a buffer between the site and any residential development fronting on 102nd Avenue. Based on the Cemetery Plan and current demand that would provide a memorial site for Maple Ridge residents well into this century. Prior to opening up a new cemetery Council would need to consider all of the various operating models including a discussion of partnerships with the private sector which would still ensure reasonable access to residents. Once again considering this recommendation is contingent upon Council deciding it wishes to continue providing this service for residents. There are certainly examples of other communities where this is not the case. Jackson Farm Report #3 Parks, Recreation and Cultural Master Plan UDdate Council will be considering the Commission recommendation to complete a Master Plan update in 2008 during the upcoming business plan review. If Council approves completion of the update next year staff will include a look at the portion of the plan which addresses parkland requirements. Although it is unlikely that anything will change which would result in a new recommendation to include the Jackson Farm there may be some changes suggested. This cannot be finally determined until the review is complete and, therefore, it may be advisable to delay any further decisions about the property until the review is finalized. Regardless of the Master Plan review it is important to note that, if urban residential development is ultimately permitted on portions of the Jackson Farm consideration would have to be given for a portion of the site to be set aside for a neighbourhood park within the parameters of the current Master Plan. Only a detailed review of the development proposal (number of homes etc.) will allow the kind of analysis required to determine the neighbourhood park and conservation area requirements. Alternatives The discussion noted above leads to the identification of four alternatives. There may be others, however, the Commission could recommend any of the following: That, if urban development is considered for the site, Council consider designation of portions of the Jackson Farm for neighbourhood park and conservation purposes That Council defer consideration of any development proposal for the Jackson Farm until completion of the Cemetery Master Plan and further, if Council confirms the District should continue providing cemetery services beyond 2020, that Council consider acquiring a portion of the Jackson Farm for the purpose of establishing a third cemetery. That Council defer consideration of any development proposal for the Jackson Farm until completion of the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Plan update in 2008 and if the plan identifies a requirement for all or a portion of the site to be set aside for park purposes that Council include the site in a referendum to be held concurrent with the 2008 municipal election to obtain the assent of the electors for the borrowing required to complete the acquisition along with other important park sites. That Council consider a combination of two and three above. Desired Outcome: The desired outcome in considering this subject is to ensure an appropriate level of park land is available for future generations living in Maple Ridge. Strategic Alignment: Providing adequate parkland is part of ensuring the community is sustainable. ci) Citizen/Customer Implications: The Cemetery Master Plan should be completed by the end of the year. The Parks, Recreation and Cultural Master Plan update will take more time to complete, at minimum to the middle of 2008. Jackson Farm Report #4 If the farm is removed from the Green Zone and the recommendation noted above is endorsed and ultimately adopted by Council any potential development proposals could not be considered until later next year. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The cost to acquire the entire site or eight to ten acres of land for a third cemetery is difficult to determine at this point. Nonetheless the acquisition cost would be substantial and would likely require some level of borrowing since it is not currently identified in our acquisition program. To date the District has not attempted to cover the cost of acquiring land for park purposes through borrowing or for cemetery purposes through the sale of plots. With respect to the Cemetery to this point the proceeds from plot sales have been used to offset operating expenditures. A change to this model should be considered which would increase burial fees and perpetual care fees sufficiently to cover the operating costs for the cemetery function. The proceeds from plot sales could then be utilized to offset the cost of land acquisition. Increasing fees to that extent may be problematic. A gradual increase is not recommended given the nature of cemetery operations and use. A single one time correction may be warranted and may be appropriate concurrent with providing less expensive memorial alternatives like columbaria which will be explored more fully in the Cemetery Plan. More detailed financial modeling and consultation with local service providers would need to be completed before a final recommendation could be made on this subject. CONCLUSIONS: Council has requested that the Commission provide a recommendation on the Jackson Farm in response to requests from some residents for reconsideration of earlier decisions about the site. The alternatives have been considered in light of the new information which is currently available. The recommended alternative acknowledges the possibility of a Parks, Recreation and Cultural Plan Update being completed next year and the Cemetery Master Plan being finalized by the end of this year. Prepared By: Mike Murray Title: General Manager Date: 2007 1101 Attachments Letter from Ms. Beryl Eales. Cemetery Land Needs Assessment Jackson Farm Report #5 \i r izi '.*r_ •1 S ' - \ I,' 5. _5 - ¶5 - \- . - 55 •_ - . . 1- 1/ 11 PCL Se-" u2Q. 'p % 1L I(ttv-raL' Gi eoL Pa-ki" /&c Di C..? Q ' !'(i*JpLQ- i2L1Q iicjq5 karq PLac- -(zp t3 C- i &)( ( '1 9 t-Lap L Li9.¼) !1IL . GOLf L+.k- -554- Dev' ictr'k erriSs;iOYeY OL I Qrv 3QQJciv OtV ___ c r7 f i p p p re e u f lc V C-S r1 f2r m ct& ci-' d Lo cc iôv k ciJ€- r2.eCL 1 - LL)CA L S i'S AQIp I I c5'- r'YL P -p oL s c' / . io S 01 css, , i cckq f1w I LCO r P refe"e-t b&o '-S / S 4p 00/• / Orv vSe of teto /q€-, ayioL CIo1 LGUfr1QJ0iI. I K7 rr-&/ c4V'&L'± 0 C- t4SeS 72u~ JCD hc ¼ /-kQ cap aJ 1k: mid 0r& QxLt, OYL'&/Phaq a"Ib, C-rea-fQa -eA) er Ymobdj-L Co b "ILL s ka '.i I s ryi t1 ck 1o± v / o ry r{CL( o Lje A (Pol-S cAl-, L.~-~ Par4<,Land \-P Csuô v sp u tr ParkE Pa I (-ov I 00 I2p & P iJ2oôa1- s h ciw d 6Ls(â/o ,thri ef/e %JO o Uo / s e Tf Pa TT, Ccn S oc i r c4i /TZ7-6 h CO r i y ak r i ,-L p c crç p p r6d '-rfr,e eco ) Ta k -í Lka G- V V3 se Ct-i ) e 5 c /? L / / Jt C ak I t1 .r -j t po dikr O-V\- pay4<, q J~L/o ar tL LD e? yy O/ C) €O LL( J MII k Cf CiA Co•i S€4t1S LAS I Skw, t- iLO rv-1Ack c p op Lv4tQL. 0 m n- fz?/- scp a oi4 CD&( s1m .c a- / p0av4 C -C p rei rvio I rr S £v U cia'-'-- p a.r'k LoL' is n &- c1a LQ4 r CLrot kpiTs a coaj B') co LQY 7 °/ oj2 /-/ b io- / c b Lt rt o4 se LQ- I S /O Cd4d1 p Jo Lc cc,o hzi - / 1c . ec oJTh re co- coJ 12J i / )ld-_,2-, v q - I .r kJ // / rrrj oJ p LHo iv o'?Mv ctcp-(-~) p a -La r N0 crLv PoL SS Pk Lb i - - tkR If-S UCJ'L urn 1+d wM-- aQ po Jp1'-- CcYI -f' I / 000 o-. H\Q IQ<D p LL 1 rd re '2-i- Hci'€ r o. r-' or 'iç is L4 o r-" 1 ô-Y' .1 Y' t O CCLrr,r-L k)Aa/- i ,I k, c- Pci. k i- dc o o cc* p o4< LcjcL. Pt. s c. od L7 i .ç. Lt LkQ t2aiJ i' v ci rduo s S P 1 I o p / ,J.I frkod d riF b00 r cu c- f fotii / / od- SLOC~ts- 1 p ZI(:, th'1e-- (/o cd LQJ( is 'lop evcu' r cM cLt p') 3 cd7 0 7Ld LQd JO 610 rv O I 0 4 U /*/i 7tP Ope/v U I Sft P S C' / C- Qt(3 so / i)U E123 Ervl f N' t-'-o P __L /0 ce7e'vLS- 6'- o€4 eko 61 OC , () r ec c I6 / IL ai rcn / Cfl m h boi' r k00 p / h ou i fl CtO cU (d- cP 1 a 1rn kLL Recrye- vi67- ddopeaL LMk I'L&- LP-ec p Ja-.yec,ieo 'Qo 000•. c) o ' To v ItL o o kI I £ C7 1 0'2j J lbic JJL re eL( ) t ctaJ Jkc6v F—cv Cl v IVY) 1" U / J iOt k -/- e1 co rt. 0 3kv J( ;6ZLLP* P 1< c sW-i (P T)o gJ r(a dq e , H t4ô- s'e.cmw tht t.2 c PL2I 3 6Lk ' çci>i nd h &} u cu ic m o-oe pcJo1 I c- A) C)'i tVi (Cy\)1 d( LS/i '- /0 r- -1rrt-re- b tct— cur' U 0 S uC-'- oS LUO A– t LLD 1 ot €& eJôp r • j$ i a- c (k2 ká oc / P v'ks P 4c /-L .i J-6b€,--. Reo fccL i-wo e- PcI ev rv a c- Jil reJ€d r i ci cdv-'n ivq Teks6 '- tJ-tQ /1QLY pOt.r4 f) £( /7(QL( / r •• JprLJ 00/) 's vv 002- c- / c '0 / lID /CcL) CLr ôLci ? 7 1 vir QkPQ . Co co ckcc'- n e ib - L ti COt ,-no I f'-(ap1t r'LJJO(•(Q °' v - P 1 k ic-, J ckco Fr-- e' -up L'a27LJ '7 a zz 'LP IjCL frv- i rd Cv -y kID rn. , qq L N6a. zeYS ocJ%4 covr LvJi? Ao 6)o [e c7d !3CCY'1 62PL rwia/s cJz,y p • f 7 JyLLO / OL- oO5oo(, 007 1 cqoi CrLn4 q g &tZ0 C~-C-SLLAIO h& ko pcn* i- ic J< P (th- -t €_cA__le JI -/ T J) • / &ko •G re tC- uh /1 17UZ2F t3 -t&L '?& frfl rrw 2o— pcj- / 07 • ,-v- ( J1 Jrl 0 a I p r6d rv cx Ifri- y-€,LcJ p rkc o / bc--- Ju vcJ tkQ Parkc &OO I L7)Qt€ Cn I14 i iç SOCAOL. B&v/(P/5-/7) Panke QeCnicS7C"- is 3 TuJWr-C 0 5€-vi cc o- cr' py 7 fCj vt 00 / n v6) D / k'a /L) e kLc cpQ jeJj q np - j — i P (001 C OO QJJO'L -Lc5 G )Y) ~P- 1t -z?- ste-n e 67- O(cQ ao LIt tJ -- c CQ, _ P -cf / q qPLp( A ad y WLb~ ILf L ~'oV~k1 Yf e Yi Qn/t,97 L ( 1 fl / /1 'r i / J+ J- cTh kJcJ4 p c .pV 0 000 c' I b, f 3r C j t I-li e '- c-eA' o f? Aeôh )En 1 0 h Ill rckso -._tE I,. ko I I" p-i f iI Le of ,, land needs assessment e fob -g tae ndca es te remanrg capacity cf des- ignated plots withia.the system. These do not :.nclude the undeveloped ans on the eas4 o the 'JuTber 3 Chre - s Cemete'v nor do they rdude some .nde.toped 'and around -e Rose Garden The foHwng taDle sh.o.A's hot' ma"v graves ae le Sectios Ocpied Reserved EMtv Tata • . 'àe Ridge Babyj_ 78 0 1 81 • .1 àby2:. 138 :. øahvTetai 31 1) -58 75 851 12 1844 499 70 . 3730 6fl -; ( Mf B4 - 540 •34 2 - 57 ______________________ _______ 55 { 431 13U2flath ______ •, .jt • .. 206-2010- ..2o1.1.2th5..2D162O2O-: 2025.2031 CuiUfát1veThtl FuIBnaUm IMI 1785 2412 2472 3025 11223 Creinabon (in2) 548 &16 960 4129 1382 4934 oIaI(m1) 2488 2601 3432 3601 4406 16151 To(a(ha) 025 026 034 036 04.4 t62 Tota' (Acres) 0 61 064 0 85 0 89 1 09 399 . .: h.erefarejnJustoverer ten ,eas by the year 2320 0 85 hect- ares '2 acres' w e requtrec -o accomooate predi:tec butia:and cremation needs in the 'Maple Rdge community. 11 JiIJI1;lu.Ic Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: 200711 14 and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole Tourism Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Fee for Service Agreement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The current agreement with Tourism Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows concludes at the end of this year. Staff have discussed the agreement with the Society and with Pitt Meadows Staff. Pitt Meadows staff have recommended to their Council that their agreement be renewed for 2008 at the same level of funding as in 2007 ($35,000) and with the same level of in kind support as in 2007. Pitt Meadows Council in Committee recently indicated their concurrence with the recommendation. It is recommended that Maple Ridge also renew its agreement with the Society for 2008. RECOMMENDATION(S): That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the 2008 Tourism Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Fee for Service Agreement attached to the 2007 Ii. 14 report on this subject. DISCUSSION: Background Context The current agreement is up at the end of 2007. Management of the agreement will ultimately fall to the new Economic Development Manager. Since that position will not be in place until the new year, it is suggested that the current agreement be renewed for one year with the understanding that it can be cancelled with three months notice if a new direction is chosen at some point in time. In any case it is anticipated that it will take a year for the Economic Development Manager to become familiar with and make recommendations on the agreement and appropriate service levels into the future. For now the agreement focuses on the Society's operation of the Visitor Information Centre which is felt to be an appropriate Municipal function. The Society continues to search for grants and partnerships to advance its industry based marketing initiatives. Desired Outcome: The desired outcome is the continuation of tourism services through the Visitor Information Centre. C) Strategic Alignment Supporting tourism contributes to local economic sustainability. Since many of the Municipality's tourism assets are based on outdoor recreation it is felt to be an appropriate investment. d) Business Plan Financial Implications: The amount identified in the attached agreement is included in the 2008 financial plan. It is lower than the amount provided prior to 2007. ($55,000 per year prior to 2007). The downward adjustment 1152 was made in 2007 to focus primarily on operation of the visitor centre since the local hotels would not agree to implement the 2% hotel tax. The Society continues to talk to the local hotels and other destination businesses about the tax or an alternative system which will generate additional funding for marketing initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: The current Tourism Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Fee for Service Agreement is up at the end of 2007. The new Economic Development Manager will oversee the agreement and may wish to year. In the interim i i proposed that the existing agreement be renewed Prepared by: Mike Mur' I General Manager: Cqrr1ihity Development, Parks and Recreation Concurrence: J.L,/(Jim) Rule Chief Administrative MWM Fee For Service Agreement THIS AGREEMENT dated the 1st day of January, 2008 BETWEEN: THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE (hereinafter called the "District") AND: TOURISM MAPLE RIDGE AND PITT MEADOWS SOCIETY (hereinafter called the "Tourism Society") THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the mutual covenants and other recited consideration, the parties agree as follows: PREAMBLE It is understood that within the terms of this agreement, the Tourism Society is representing the District's interests in providing tourism related services and will act with this in mind. SERVICES: 1. The Tourism Society agrees to supply the said services as hereinafter set forth in Schedule "A", for a period of one (1) year, commencing on the 1st day of January, 2008. FEES: 1. In consideration for the Tourism Society supplying the services and deliverables as detailed in Schedule "A", the District agrees to pay to the Tourism Society the sum of Thirty-five Thousand Dollars ($35,000) on or about January 1,2008. In addition, the District agrees to supply support goods and services to the Tourism Society in a calendar year. The goods and services include: • Provision of space for a Tourism Information Kiosk - $1500.00 • Costs associated with the preparation of the society's annual financial review report - $1500.00 • Booth at 2007 Ridge Meadows Home Show - $450.00 • Amortized lease hold improvements for Kiosk (Year 3) - $1,529.00 *Note: All costs are approximate and are subject to change. Total cost of said goods and services will not exceed $5,000. All requests for District funding for one-time projects, items or events shall be by separate submissions to the District, through the Economic Development Department. Funding will be considered based on the project, items or event's merit and funding availability and will be subject to confirmation in writing from the District. Where additional funding, other than that identified within this Agreement, is required for specific services, projects, or deliverables, the Tourism Society will prepare a written business case and proposal which would include but not be limited to: • Identifying the purpose of the project, item or event • Identifying the additional expected value to the District and community • Identifying all other sources of funding and their status • Identifying other District resources required, other than the requested funding Depending upon the size and scope of the request, the Department, Economic Advisory Commission and/or Council may request that the Tourism Society make a presentation of the business case for the project, item or event at a meeting. The Tourism Society shall not incur any expenses for which the District shall be required to reimburse the Tourism Society, or for which the District in any other way shall become liable to any person. The District shall not incur any expenses for which the Tourism Society shall be required to reimburse the District, or for which the Tourism Society in any other way shall become liable to any person. The District is entitled to a Tourism Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Society Membership (value $250.00) at no additional cost to the District upon the execution of this Fee for Service Agreement. III. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 1. A written report related to the Deliverables/Measures listed in Schedule A of this document will be generated by the Tourism Society and will be reviewed by a District representative, the Tourism Society Executive Director and President on a quarterly basis, or as otherwise agreed by both parties. A presentation will be made to Council by the Executive Director and BoardPresident on a semi annual basis with highlights from the quarterly reports included in the year end report. The year end report will also include a new business plan, budget, and deliverables for the forthcoming year. 2. The Tourism Society shall provide the following documents to the District by October 31, 2008: A business plan and budget for the coming year. A strategic five year financial plan for the Tourism Society that identifies long term financial requirements and the Society's progress toward meeting those requirements through new sources of revenue (i.e. amusement levy, etc ... ) A status report on deliverables identified in the current Fee-For- Service Agreement. 3. The Tourism Society shall provide interim financial and status reports to the District on a quarterly basis, as follows: March 30, June 30, September 30, and December 30. 4. The Tourism Society shall provide the District with a copy of their Constitution & Bylaws and remain in good standing with the Provincial Registrar. 5. The Tourism Society shall provide the District with a copy of their annual report and reviewed financial statements. The Tourism Society shall ensure that a review report is prepared on the annual financial statements by a CA or CGA in good standing. The District shall reserve the right to require a full audit at the District's discretion and expense. IV. COMMITTEE REPRESENTATION: The District shall have the right to appoint two non-voting representatives to act in a liaison capacity to the Tourism Society Board for Directors. The Tourism Society shall allow the District's appointees to attend Board meetings as observers. District appointees may be Council members and/or District staff as determined by the District. The District will provide the Tourism Society limited Human Resource services to support in the seiection and evaluation of the Executive Director V. INDEMNIFICATION: 1. The Tourism Society agrees to and does hereby indemnify and save harmless the District, its officers and employees from and against all claims, demands, actions, suits, damages, losses, costs and expenses by whomsoever brought, made or incurred arising out of directly or indirectly .-' the provision of services by the Tourism Society under this Agreement; and 2. The Tourism Society must take out and maintain during the whole of the term of this Agreement third party liability insurance with an insurer in a form approved by the District in the amount of $5 million, that must name the District as an insured party along with the Tourism Society. VI. OTHER The Tourism Society and the District agree that the provisions of this Agreement shall be given such reasonable interpretation as will facilitate a full and proper handling of tourism management and facilitation for all residents of and visitors to the District. Renewal of the Fee-For-Service Agreement will be considered annually, unless terminated in accordance with Clause VI 3. Renewal will be based on the fulfillment of deliverables from the previous contract, proposed budget, proposed business plan and new deliverables, the choice of the District to finance, and any other issues that the District determines are pertinent to contract renewal. I. This contract may be terminated by either party upon providing three (3) months notice in writing to the other and the Tourism Society shall return to the District any unexpended fees paid to the Tourism Society by the District pursuant to S. Il. (1). VII. ENUREMENT The provisions of this Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Tourism Society, the Tourism Society's heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and the District, its successors and assigns. VIII. ENTIRE AGREEMENT/MODIFICATION This Agreement and the attachments comprise the whole agreement between the parties and may not be modified, changed, amended or waived except by signed written agreement of the parties. IX. ASSIGNMENT The Tourism Society shall not assign (in any manner including by operation of law) or sub-contract any of its obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the District. X. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws and courts of the Province of British Columbia and shall in all respects be treated as a British Columbia contract. THE CORPORATE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE hereunto affixed in the presence of: MAYOR MUNICIPAL CLERK THE CORPORATE SEAL OF THE TOURISM MAPLE RIDGE AND PITT MEADOWS SOCIETY was hereunto affixed in the presence of: PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SCHEDULE "A" TOURISM MAPLE RIDGE AND PITT MEADOWS SOCIETY DELI VERABLES: GOALS & OBJECTIVES - JANUARY TO DECEMBER, 2008 1.0 LONG TERM STRATEGIC PLANNING 1.1 Present recommendations from location/funding research to both Municipalities for Centralized VC including cost estimates for construction/land acquisition. Measure: Recommendations received. 1.2 SecurE and identify marketing partnership opportunities with other communities. Measure: Identify marketing opportunities secured. Report on potential marketing opportunities 1.3 Complete the Tourism BC Community Foundations Programs if and when Tourism BC selects our comm inity to participate. Measure: Report to City on long term initiatives and direction resulting from this process. 2.0 VISITOR SERVICES Continue Full Status Visitor Centre currently housed in Pitt Meadows to enhance Tourism BC (TBC) fee-for- service opportunities. A Full Status Visitor's Centre is as defined in the TBC Visitor Network Membership Levels 2005 and Visitor Infonetwork membership Terms and Conditions 2005). It is the expectation of the City that Tourism Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows will maintain Full Status Visitor Info Centre requirements according to the TBC Terms and Conditions. In addition to the hours of operation required by TBC, the Visitor's Centre must be open a minimum of 4 hours five days a week (Wednesday through Sunday) between September 1 to October 31 and Mayl to June 301h• The Visitor's Information Centre must be open a minimum of 4 hours five days per week (preferably at least one weekend day) October 31 to April 30. The following schedule will be implemented in 2008 to be evaluated on a quarterly basis to ensure number of visitors is not dropping. Adjustments may be made upon agreement by all parties. January 1 to April 30: May 1 to June 30: July 1 to August 31: September 1 to October 31 November 1 to December 31 Monday to Friday, 10am to 4pm Monday to Friday, 10am to 4pm Saturday & Sunday, 10am, to 2pm Monday to Sunday, 9am to 5pm Monday to Friday, 10am to 4pm Saturday & Sunday, lOam, to 2pm Monday to Friday, 10am to 4pm 2.1. Maintain and report on Visitor Centre (VC) and Kiosks including: 2.1.1 Develop a plan to increase number of visitors to the Pitt Meadows VC by 10%, from visitors in 2007 to visitors in 2008 I Measure: Report on plan and percentage of actual increase. I 2.1.2 Report on continued partnership with SD 42, Seniors Society and HRDC to assist with staffing of VC and Maple Ridge Library Kiosk, report to include number of staff, hours worked, additional funding received, and employee satisfaction based on exit surveys completed by staff. Measure: Report received Including information related to number of staff, hours worked, additional funding received, employee satisfaction. 1/8 3.0 2.1.3 Report on training, orientation and local familiarization opportunities to VC and Kiosk staff and volunteers, report to include number of training/orientations sessions and number of participants. Measure: Report received including number of training/orientation/familiarization sessions completed and number of participants. 2.1 .4 Maintain value added visitor benefits to the VC and Kiosk as applicable including: accommodation reservations, activity bookings, sales of local event tickets, sales of BC Parks Parking Pass sales, email check kiosk, retail sales, local and regional travel itinerary development, picnic table, DiKe racK, courresy pnone. Measure: Report received including success of above visitor benefits (e.g. number of accommodation reservations, number of experience package bookings, number of local event tickets, number of BC Parks Parking passes sold, number of logons for email kiosk, value of retail sales and net profit, number of Itinerary developed, availability of picnic table, bike rack and courtesy phone. 2.2 Track 4aple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Visitor Guide distribution. Measure: Report on total distribution, and break down of distribution through sources (e.g. number of guides distributed through VC, number of guides distributed through Tourism BC, etc.) 2.3 Continue retail marketing program at the Pitt Meadows VC (i.e. sale of BC Parks passes, retail, etc. I Measure: Report on sales revenues and profits for 2006 and 2007 and 2008. 2.3.1 TBC retail, Super Natural BC (SNBC) reservations. Measure: Report including successful sales and reservations and any Fadditional revenue or opportunities received from TBC or SNBC. ADVOCACY & EDUCATION 3.1 Report to the Pitt Meadows Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) and the Maple Ridge Economic Advisory Committee (EAC) on specific types of unique attraction opportunities and a recommendation on the role of the municipalities in developing these types of opportunities. I Measure: Report on opportunities presented 3.2 Delivei tourism related presentations to local community groups. Measure: Report on number of presentations made, type of presentation made, and to which groups. 3.3 Tourisi n Related Training Programs. 3.3.1 Deliver public and private tourism related training programs in botfl communities i.e. SuperHost, etc.). I Measure: Report on events held, attendance at each, and profit genei 3.4 Continue alliances with industry and community stakeholders/networks including; 3.4.1 Participate in regional tourism roundtables/committees to provide a MR/PM perspective. •Measure: Report on which roundtables/committees were attended and benefit to the Municipalities of attendance. 3.4.2 Mintin mrirrrw-ai mambarahin and invôlvament with various tourism related community groups (Chamber of Commerce, Festival Society, Arts Council, Historical Society, Airport, Parks and Leisure Services, Katzie, etc.) Measure: Report on memberships attained and any benefits to the Municipalities. 3.4.3 Atthnd functions and events and su000rt industry and community qroups. Measure: Report on specific functions and events attended and types of support provided. Compare to previous year. 3.4.4 Post community group event information in monthly newsletter. Measure: Report on types of group event information included in the Fnewsletters. Compare to previous year. #22348v1 4.0 MARKETING AND PROMOTIONS 4.1 Develop annual Marketing Strategy and Plan including specific strategic focus and rational. Within this plan the market and inventory of tourism attractions will be defined and specifically identified. lmpten mt Dromotion and sales strateav for new product development packages. 4.2 Resea Measure: Strategy and Plan received including the above mentioned requirements. A year-end report on the implementation and successes and challenges of the plan received h and imolement a trackina system for oroaram results. I Measure: Report including the above mentioned requirements. 4.3 Develop a communications and media relations strategy. I Measure: Copy of communications and media relations strate #22348v1 MAPLE District of Maple Ridge Cotumbia Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: 2007 11 14 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATrN: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: 2008 UBCM Tourism Funding EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: UBCM has announced it will be allocating funding to enhance local tourism initiatives once again in 2008. Council will recall the District used the 2007 funding to: enhance marketing for several of our larger events, acquire an events readograph (currently being designed) to let travelers know what events are coming up in the community participate in the scenic (highway) 7 program expand the Walk Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Magazine to include events and other outdoor recreation opportunities The total amount allocated to Maple Ridge in 2007 was $160,000. Our intent is to complete all projects by next March. A similar amount is anticipated in 2008 and the application must be submitted by the end of this month. We have had discussions with Pitt Meadows, Tourism Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows and the local Spirit of BC Community Committee with respect to the projects we would like to propose. RECOMMENDATION(S): That staff be authorized to submit an application for Tourism funding to the Union of British Columbia Municipalities for the projects outlined in the 2007 1114 report on this subject. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context The projects we wish to propose follow: 1. ReionaI Marketing Suort for Festivals $50,000 The intent of this funding is similar to that provided in 2007......to enhance regional marketing for events like the Caribbean Festival; Jazz and Blues Festival, etc. Those involved in the program in 2007 had to demonstrate how they would use the additional support to enhance their regional marketing. The majority reported significantly enhanced attendance from outside the community as a result. A committee of the Parks and Recreation Commission allocated the funding with support from the Economic Development Office. 1153 Snorts Tourism Plan Develooment and Imolementation $60.000 A time duration position would be hired through the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Spirit of BC Committee to: - work with local sport organizers to inventory their events and opportunities for events (by connecting with Provincial Sport Governing Bodies), - connect sport organizers to those who select venues and - assist in preparing bids. Pitt Meadows would provide additional funding. Scenic Seven Promotion $5,000 This follows an earlier commitment to participate with several other communities along the Lougheed Corridor in the promotion of this transportation route as a more interesting alternative to the Freeway on the south side of the river. Visitor Information Centre Exoloratiori/Design $55,000 The intent of this funding will be to design a new visitor information centre in a more appropriate location to serve both Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows into the future. The intent will be to secure a site, explore partnership opportunities with value added partners (i.e. the Penticton Visitor Centre is a wine store as well) and complete a design leading up to development of the facility in a future phase of the program. CONCLUSIONS: The UBCM tourism funding program is available again in 2008. A number of projects have been identified as possibilities in consultation with Tourism Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows, the City of Pitt Meadows and the local Spirit of BC Committee. Council authorization is requested to proceed with the application. / Prepared by: Mike Murray / General Manager: Community Development, Parks and Recreation / Concurrence: / J.L. (Jim) Rule I Chief Administrative Officer MWM \ rijuii.ici District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: 2007 11 15 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Comm fttee of the Whole SUBJECT: Joint Municipal Emergency Program Agreement EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The current Joint Municipal Emergency Program Agreement with the City of Pitt Meadows is up at the end of this month. The attached updated agreement is forwarded for Council consideration. RECOMMENDATION(S): That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the Joint Municipal Emergency Program Agreement attached to the 2007 111.5 report on this subject. DISCUSSION: Background Context: The agreement has been in place for the past five years and has served both communities well during that time. It has facilitated a considerable degree of joint planning and communication between the two Municipal operations on this subject and has helped both to achieve a higher level of preparedness than would otherwise have been possible. This is particularly true to the extent that the resources of trained personnel in both Municipalities are available to the other in the event of an extended emergency. The only significant change to the previous agreement being proposed in the new agreement is that each community will have its own Emergency Program Coordinator. The two coordinators will share the responsibilities for the Joint Program aspects of Emergency Preparedness previously handled by one person. The reason for the change is that each community had specific areas of focus they wished to address within each of their independent operations that could not be dealt with within the context of the Joint Program. On the other hand the new agreement spells out the need for one Emergency Social Services function which will be addressed as part of the joint function and one primary emergency program manual. This function will be cost shared proportionate to population. Desired Outcomes: The desired outcome is a relatively high degree of preparedness to be able to respond effectively to any potential disaster which may be faced by the two communities. C) Strategic Alignment : Being adequately prepared to provide an appropriate emergency response is felt to be even more critical today than previously given the degree of climate 1154 .., ,! •' change we are experiencing and the extreme weather events that comes with that phenomena. This is part of creating a safe and sustainable community. d) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The District will receive an annual payment from the City of Pitt Meadows of approximately $11,000 as compensation for work by the Emergency Program Assistant. The District's 2008 budget already contains the funding required to meet its obligations under the agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The Joint Municipal Emergency Program has enhanced the level of emergency preparedness significantly in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows over the past several years. The proposed agreement will fine tune the existing partnership between the two communities which has, in part, led to that enhancemeptnd will lead to even greater levels of preparedness in future. / ( / by: Mike Murray / General Manager: m nity'Development, Parks and Recreation J.L. (Jim) Rule I Chief Administrative Officer MWM Joint Municipal Emergency Program AGREEMENT This Agreement is made as of the day of November, 2007 BETWEEN. THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, of 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9 OF THE FIRST PART ["Maple Ridge"] AND: THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PITF MEADOWS, 12007 Harris Road, Pitt Meadows, B.C. V3Y 2B5 OF THE SECOND PART [Pitt Meadows] (Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows are hereinafter collectively called "the Municipalities") WHEREAS: The Municipalities are required under the Emergency Program Act, R.S.B.C. 1996 c. 111, to prepare a Local Emergency Plan; The Councils of the Municipa1itis by resolution have agreed to establish a Joint Local Emergency Plan; The Councils of the Municipalities have agreed to enter into a formal agreement on the delivery of a Joint Municipal Emergency Program ("JMIEP") in the Districts of Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows based on the Joint Local Emergency Plan; The Municipalities are further required to establish and maintain an emergency management committee; The Municipalities have agreed to establish a joint committee to be known as the "Joint Municipal Emergency Program Management Committee" ("Management Committee"), .'fl 41 and to each appoint three (3) staff representatives including the CAO's as members of the Management Committee. The Councils of the Municipalities are further authorized to appoint an Emergency Management Coordinator. Each Municipality will appoint its own Emergency management Coordinator. The two Coordinators will have the responsibility of managing this agreement with direction from their respective CAOs. NOW THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises in this Agreement, the Parties agree as follows: 2. Definitions In this Agreement: "BCERMS" shall refer to the British Columbia Emergency Response Management System; "Capital Costs" shall mean non reoccurring capital expenses calculated in accordance with sound accounting principles; "CAO's" shall mean the Chief Administrative Officers of the Municipalities; "EOC" shall mean the Municipal Emergency Operations Centre; "ESS" shall refer to the Joint Emergency Social Services program; "Joint EOC" shall refer to the Municipalities Joint Emergency Operations Centre; "JIVIIEP" shall refer to the Joint Municipal Emergency Program "Emergency Management Coordinator" means the person or persons appointed by each of the municipalities to coordinate the Joint Municipal Emergency Program; "Operating Costs" shall mean the total of the actual net non-capital expenses calculated in accordance with sound accounting principles; "PEP" shall mean the Provincial Emergency Program; 3. Management Committee The Management Committee shall be comprised of the following members: The Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Emergency Management Coordinators; CAO - Maple Ridge and CAO - Pitt Meadows; 1 Representative - Maple Ridge as designated by CAO of Maple Ridge; 1 Representative - Pitt Meadows as designated by CAO Pitt Meadows; The Emergency Program Assistant; and Representatives who may be added to the Management Committee by agreement of the CAOs. 3.1 Management Committee Responsibilities Manage all pre-activation activities of JMEP; Develop JM1EP for the Municipalities; Operate under the British Columbia Emergency Response Management System (BCERMS) guidelines; Provide input into and incorporate coordinated JMEP initiatives within each Municipality's Annual Emergency Program Business Plan; Consider, coordinate, implement and evaluate training; Review and update the joint emergency manual at least one time per year and ensure the Municipalities' manuals are consistent with respect to the JMEP; Meet once per month or as required; Manage the JMEP Agreement; 4. Municipalities' Emergency Preparedness Coordinators The Emergency Preparedness Coordinators shall: Administer JMEP; Conduct exercises to ensure JMEP is effective and in a state of readiness; 3 Act as the point of contact for their respective Municipalities with PEP and all other agencies concerned with emergency planning and operations; Advise the Mayors, Councils, CAO's and the Management Committee on matters relating to JIMEP as required Prepare and maintain a current JMEP manual in conjunction with all jurisdictions whom the Municipal Emergency Preparedness Coordinators deem it necessary to consult; Chair the JMEP meetings. Be responsible for calling the individual Municipal EOC Members and other BCERMS response agencies together at regular intervals to ensure group coordination, training, and the sharing of information With respect to these functions it is understood that the two Municipalities Emergency Program Coordinators will coordinate their efforts so as to share the responsibilities and the time required to support the JMEP equally. At the beginning of each year the Coordinators will convene a discussion with the Management Committee to determine which responsibilities each Coordinator will carry out for the coming year. In considering the functions to be performed the Management Committee may determine that additional resources are required to complete special projects and will determine how those resources are to be obtained and shared (such as training resources). 4. General Provisions Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the respective Municipalities shall each: Establish and equip an Emergency Operations Centre in their respective municipality; Cover the costs associated with the operation of their respective Emergency Operation Centre; Adopt the BCERMS protocol at the EOC, Joint EOC and Site Level; Provide training to the levels established by the Management Committee and ensure appropriate assignments of personnel (staff or volunteers) sufficient to operate their EOC's; 4 • * 5, Emergency Centre Activations Municipal Emergency Operation Centre Activation In the event of an emergency that affects only one of the Municipalities the Municipal Emergency Operations Centre in the municipality affected shall be activated in the following manner: By the CAO of the municipality requiring the response; The Municipal EOC shall operate by the BCERMS protocol and shall have access to utilize the resources of JMEP (Municipal Emergency Program Assistant and Emergency Social Services Function); The CAO who has activated their EOC shall forthwith notify the other CÁO of the activation. Joint Emergency Operation Centre (Joint EOC) Activation In the event of an emergency that affects both municipalities the Joint EOC shall be activated in the following manner: By both of the Municipal CÁO's or their designates acting together Operate by the BCERMS protocol. Personnel and volunteers normally assigned to each Municipal EOC shall be available for the Joint EOC and shall have access to all the resources of the Joint EOC and IMEP. Personnel and volunteers normally assigned to each Municipal EOC shall also be available at cost to either of the independent Municipal EOCs should an activation occur in one Municipality which does not effect the other. Such resources shall be made available when the Municipality in which the activation occurs requests assistance from the other Municipality at the discretion of the other Municipality. 6. Declaration of State of Local Emergency A declaration of a State of Local Emergency may only be declared by each municipality in accordance with the Emergency Program Act. 5 ,.._. 7. Administration Clerical support for JMEP shall be provided by the Emergency Program Assistant of the Maple Ridge - Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services Department, District of Maple Ridge; The Municipalities will share the cost of the clerical services proportionate to their respective populations in the same fashion as costs are shared for the Joint Parks and Leisure Services Function; The Municipalities will prepare sections of their procedures for inclusion in the Joint Municipal Emergency Program manual; Copies of the Municipalities' emergency manuals shall be kept at the EOC's and Joint EOC facilities. 8. Emergency Social Services The Emergency Social Services Function and organization shall be maintained for both Municipalities by the Maple Ridge Emergency Program Assistant. The cost for the E.S.S. function shall be shared in the same fashion as the clerical services noted above in 7(b). For clarity the Emergency Program Assistant job is full time with 90% of the Assistant's duties split between providing clerical support and managing the Emergency Social Services function. Therefore, 90% of the Assistant's salary shall be shared proportionate to population in the same fashion as noted in 7(b) above. Payments shall be provided in the same manner as in the Joint Parks and Leisure Services Agreement 9. Withdrawal by the Municipalities Either of the Municipalities may withdraw from this Agreement by giving notice in writing to the other Municipality, not less than twelve months prior to the effective date of the withdrawal. 10. Term This Agreement shall be in effect for a term of five years commencing on the date of signing. 31 ,._ 11. Costs The Municipalities shall each consider the Operating and Capital Budgets of the Joint Municipal Emergency Program as outlined in the Business Plan. Costs associated with the equipping and the staffing of the Municipal EOC's shall be the responsibility of the respective Municipality. In the event of an emergency the costs shall be borne by the Municipality affected and charged back to the Provincial Emergency Program as applicable. Other costs defined in specific Mutual Aid Agreements shall be paid in accordance with those agreements. All other cost sharing shall be as described in clause 7(b) and clause 8 above. Execution Date Y M D Party(ies) Signature(s) THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE by its authorized signatories: Mayor Clerk THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PITt MEADOWS by its authorized signatories: Mayor Clerk 7