Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-10-17 Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA October 17, 2011 1:00 P.M. Council Chamber Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more information or clarification before proceeding to Council. Note: If required, there will be a 15-minute break at 3:00 p.m. Chair. Acting Mayor 1. DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS - (10 minutes each) 1:00 p.m. 1.1 Alouette Valley Association - B. Hobbs - Recreational Roadway Proposal 2. PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Note: Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications maybe permitted to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes. Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda: 1101 2011-019-RZ, 10515, 10595 240 Street; 23950 Zeron Avenue, RS-3 to RM-1 Staff report dated October 17, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871-2011 to adjust the conservation boundary be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6864-2011 to permit a 48 unit townhouse development be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Committee of the Whole Agenda October 17, 2011 Page 2 of 4 1102 RZ/026/07, 23616 132 Avenue, Final One Year Extension Staff report dated October 17, 2011 recommending that a final one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/026/07 to permit the future development of 12 townhouses in the RM-1 zone and one single family lot under the R-1 zone. 1103 2011-091-AL, 11937 260 Street, Non -Farm Use within the Agricultural Land Reserve Staff report dated October 17, 2011 recommending that application 2011- 091-AL for non -farm use for a temporary residential use on land within the Agricultural Land Reserve in order to retain an existing dwelling be authorized to proceed to the Agricultural Land Commission. 1104 DP/DVP/031/08, 22606, 22612 and 22618 119 Avenue; 11876 and 11866 226 Street; 22611 Selkirk Avenue Staff report dated October 17, 2011 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/031/08 to regulate form and character of proposed mixed -use buildings and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/031/08 to permit future construction of two buildings with ground floor commercial and residential above under the C-3 zone. 1105 Award of Contract for Tender of the Albion Dyke Upgrade Staff report dated October 17, 2011 recommending that the contract for the Albion Dyke Upgrades be awarded to Double M Excavating, and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign the contract. 1106 Liquor Licence Change, Club Climax Staff report dated October 17, 2011 recommending that an application by Club Climax for an extension of hours of liquor service be supported and that a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch. 1107 The Royal Canadian Legion - Remembrance Day Parade Staff report dated October 17, 2011 providing information regarding the request received from the Royal Canadian Legion - Maple Ridge Branch #88 to use municipal streets for a parade on Friday, November 11, 2011. Committee of the Whole Agenda October 17, 2011 Page 3 of 4 3. FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERVICES (including Fire and Police) 1131 Disbursements for the month ended September 30, 2011 Staff report dated September 30, 2011 recommending that the disbursements for the month of September 2011 be approved. 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERVICES 1151 5. CORRESPONDENCE 1171 5. OTHER ISSUES 1181 7. ADJOURNMENT Committee of the Whole Agenda October 17, 2011 Page 4 of 4 S. COMMUNITY FORUM COMMUNITY FORUM The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the individual members of Council. The total time for this Forum is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a response will be given. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings and delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca Checked by Date: ICI Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: October 17, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-019-RZ Chief Administrative Officer First and Second Reading MEETING: C of W Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871-2011 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6864-2011 10515 240 Street, 10595 240 Street, 23950 Zeron Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) , to permit development of a 48 unit townhouse development. The proposed rezoning from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1(Townhouse Residential) is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, however, an Official Community Plan amendment is required to adjust the conservation boundary. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; 2. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871-2011 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 3. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871- 2011 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 1101 4. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871-2011 be given First and Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6864-2011 be given First and Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading. i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Amendment to Schedule "B" & "C" of the Official Community Plan; iii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iv. Road dedication as required; V. Consolidation of the development site; vi. A landscape plan prepared by a Landscape Architect must be submitted including the security to do the works; vii. Park dedication as required, including construction of walkways and equestrian trail; viii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations; ix. Pursuant to the Contaminated Site Regulations of the Environmental Management Act, the subdivider will provide a Site Profile for the subject land(s); and X. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Atelier Pacific Architecture Inc Brian Shigetomi Spencer Creek Ventures Inc Legal Description: Lot: 9, Plan: 29456 Lot: 3, Plan: 3825 Plan: 3825 WA OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses North: Use: Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation East: Use: Zone: Designation West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: Urban Residential/Major Corridor Urban Residential/Major Corridor RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Single family residential RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential Urban Residential/Major Corridor Vacant RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Conservation, Urban Residential and Medium Density Residential Single family residential and conservation area RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) Conservation, Urban Residential and Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) Urban Residential Vacant Multi -Family Residential 1.98 HA. 2401h Street Urban Standard 2011-019-DP/VP The subject site is characterized by steep slopes along the western portion of the property and Spencer Creek along the southern boundary. The land flattens out towards 240th and with re- grading provides an adequate building area for the 48 proposed townhomes. Typically a 30 metre setback is required along Spencer Creek, however, justification and additional compensation has been provided in support of reducing the setback to 15 metres. Due to the topography of the site a small portion of the setback falls short of the 15 metre requirement. To compensate for this additional area will be dedicated for the protection of Spencer Creek. Further compensation is to be provided through additional planting and stream enhancements. The compensation measures will be addressed in the Watercourse Protection Development Permit. -3- c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The Official Community Plan designates this property Urban Residential/Major Corridor which provides for a range of densities in a ground oriented housing form, subject to satisfying the Infill and Compatibility Criteria prescribed in the Plan. The proposed rezoning to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) is in compliance with the OCP designation, however, an Official Community Plan amendment is required to adjust the conservation boundaries as depicted in the Official Community Plan. Zoning Bylaw: In order to accomodate the current proposal the following Zoning Bylaw variances are required; Required Proposed Front Yard Setback 7.5 metres 4.5 metres Interior Lot Setback 7.5 metres 4.5 metres Building Height 10.5 metres 11.7 metres The above variances will be the subject of a future report to Council. The proposed variances are supportable as they are typical for townhouse development in the area and are minor in nature. Development Permits: The application site is adjacent to Spencer Creek and is challenged with slopes greater than 25% grade. A Watercourse Protection and Natural Features Development Permit is, therefore, required for the preservation, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment of the watercourse areas and of the natural features on the site. A Security will be taken as a condition of the issuance of the Development Permit to ensure that the Development Permit area guidelines are met. Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan, a Multi -Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. Accordingly, prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Development Permit must be reviewed and approved. An application for the Development Permit has been received. Adherence of this project to the guidelines of this permit will be provided for Council in a future report. Advisory Design Panel: The current application was presented to Advisory Design Panel on July 14, 2011. The Panel raised a small number of concerns related to the building design and building and landscape materials. Since that time the applicant revised the drawings and resubmitted to the panel for acceptance in 111121i! August 2011. The current design reflects these changes and has been accepted by the design panel. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: On September 29th, 2011 the applicant hosted a Development Information Meeting at Kanaka Creek Elementary School concerning the current proposal. Approximately thirteen people filled in the attendance list and eight filled out a comment sheet. The residents in attendance were concerned about increasing the traffic along 240th Street as it is already perceived as very busy and unsafe especially at 240th Street and McClure Drive. There is also concern about development in this area and the lack of school capacity available for existing residents. e) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: Concerns have been raised about the proposed site entrance off 240th Street. As a result the Engineering Department requested the applicant to provide a traffic study to determine if a left turn bay is required along 240th Street. The traffic study prepared by BWW Consulting dated April 7, 2011 has determined that no left turn bay is required for the proposed development. Fire Department: The Fire Department has no concerns with the proposed development. Building Department: There have been concerns raised regarding the grading and slope stability on the site. The applicant is required to address all concerns related to lot grading and slope stability and a geotechnical report will be registered as a Restrictive Covenant on title prior to Final Reading. f) Intergovernmental Issues: School District A referral has been sent to School District 42. No comments have been received from the School District at the time of preparing this draft. Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, to adjust the conservation boundary, is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council -5- of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. g) Environmental Implications: The applicant proposes a 15 metre setback along Spencer Creek. Additional compensation and justification has been provided to support the proposed setback variance. An Enhancement and Restoration Plan and securities for the work proposed is required before issuance of the Watercourse Development Permit. CONCLUSION: The current application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. It is, therefore, recommended that First and Second Reading be given Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6864-2011 and Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871-2011 and they be forwarded to Public Hearing. Prepared by: Sarah Atkinson Plat T nician Approved by. Christine Carter, M.PI, MCIP Act! Dir or of Planning Approvedd Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development'services Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule �� L Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - OCP Amending Bylaw 6871-2011 Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw 6864-2011 Appendix D - Site Plan Appendix E - Building Elevation Plans Appendix F - Landscape Plans [r.w A 10735 �gF0�7 `� H1a 10 15 14 N 13 � 25 [o7a1 o 0 8 m 2ao51 19 bF v 322 10729 xX ry N e ' 0 2pp61 - 18 IK 10614 5 P 18 94 <p727 Rem 1 4 5 6 7 8 2°p6 17 IW2 323 v �0723 ° 17 N 18 19 20 q� m 10721 L P 4 24 ;0 y �q rob [u m 10717 i4 ore o_ Rem Rem 324 3 a 107 AVE. m 2 3 LM 1537,,g1 m50s69 10699 m m 10705 50 49 15 H 325 2 thew 51- 10so3s� 0695 a 31 r 11 �1 1121 22 23 24 1oe5? 48 327 't�g 329 a P 1 94 1 32 [�12 ucw 33p 1 6 14 52 1 7. .a a 93f PARK 1 lasso t0560 7 106" 10663 56 fOBBf) I06�3 47 S 13 - 10572 $ ,` tnc93 13 5' w 46 14 o6q� 3 F " 4 ac a53� "6R, &� SUBJECT PROPERTIES 54 53 1 y 3 to 3 m3 5 8 9 10 11 -91A �+` 41 40 30> d Dry ry3j7 s h 12 59 .14 43 42 3p8 V loam $ S a 3p9 1 106 AVE. 11A di i 60 Q tO6 AVE. ?70 r rydo ro� + 4 N 1B 1osul 61 64 e n 65 72 g 25 fO5B6 tow & N n74 P w ' 8 M 15 i7 62 66 W82' 73 2°1,U ry^ p 3 J 24 1a75g6 Rem 3 10595 106p a N 38 37 36 35 iosps 10,,ap 18 P 3825 106163 67 i 71 7 24B tL a [os7s 1657a o6 249 ,� �O tOsrs 19 68 'Si. `ib 70 V Q 153 22 u. 288 Q 2,57 ti 69 1 m 2S2 a-"S 21 A o 287 loses 7y3s6 3g4 EP 16557 2S3 Q Q �g fQ53x 2Ss ��a� 7pss 3S>3537�"s 33g PARK LMP 51537 2SS � '�358 0 '6saT 6aa 4 i 3S 3S2 t05a2 339 Rs� 9 0'�s 2S6 �a � ros2y 360 351 10s36 3Qa 7 10521 `� r 141 9 10sva 258 [osas 361 350 0513 a '6$ta P 29456 362 349 10511 coo 1A 10509 343 363 348 10s10 10515 BCP 8155 259 1052 1oso3 g64 5 osos 344 p50 1�g7, Rem. Pd. A 260 347 h 345 o �9i toos 1 �,Cb ro ^346 41 Rem. Pd. A BCP 8155 5 3I0 0 373 26 10� 1gCP 106� 269 10423 2�6 10415 374 5 270 1oa1s 375 275 274 273 272 271 toalo a P 10921 6 10456 g P 14750 P 22743 P 14750 A Rem 7 $ 10420 P 10921 4 L cit f Pitt meacLows . " ' 10515/95 240 STREET & `j0 � ` 23950 ZERON AVENUE f� ri ± CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF _ MAPLE RIDGE N District of 'I ! _ Langley PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:3,000 DATE: Feb 18, 2011 FILE: 2011-019-VP BY: PC FRASER R. APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE A Bylaw to amend Schedules "B" & "C" forming part of the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 6425-2006 as amended WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "B" and "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1, This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871 - 2011. 2. Schedule "B" and "C" is hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 16557) Lot 3 District Lots 406 and 408 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 3825 Lot 9 District Lots 406 and 408 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 29456 Lot 3 Except: Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 16557); District Lots 406 and 408 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 3825 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 816, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adjusting the Conservation boundary. 3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6871-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of A.D. 20 . READ A SECOND TIME the day of A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of A.D. 20 . READ A THIRD TIME the day of A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 10610 10717 '..f f f r 10719 em Rem/324 cv 3 aCIO2 3 LM 15371060E 10609 107AVE. 10705 30 4110695 50 49 10 I325 2 a'f 3106970326 � � 5110606 1 21 22 23 24 106aa 327 d P 1 94 32 48 { . 1tl60.1 , ISO 1 6 14 ?r PARK 10a75 FUSS 56 52 toag2 .� 47 wy ow \ 332 1S1BC 7 13 10663 y o 2 BCP 25369 �� [� 1065, 1os8o 1ps�3 10672 55 LLIA / "37 70sgl/ n�i _ _�p 2 P 57 10670 \ 46 54 7538, o io682 22 373 ti a c) 4 5 8 9 10 Tp 131 LMP51538 53 " LM 5153 e M1 10625 M 12 N ` 10660 59 58 z v 45 44 " o 3 17 N N 08 a 10650 r N A N N may"' "09 _ 1 tO6 AVE. ,�y9�� �p' T� 63 R N 106 AVE. --I 370 10640 64 8 N65 4, r "gg H 16 "c3 10596 61 10630 72 Af vi 25 R �j ti 26 y788� 1 15 62 66 1osz1 N73 741 24 10586 7 Rem 3 losss 10620 S LMP51538 N LMP m ry� 3 " 10565 10.480 P 3825 2 13 m` �3 10610 63 67 7 71 vy A8 2 ti 10575 T0574 19 m 49 4 �s0 "�O $�, �m 70 10565 y j 7 22 10568 20 iL S` 68 3 !S Q �� ss 10560 m 1O S 2S 21 A 4 2 LMP 51539 0 ?S 70gso 7 366 3S4 °rE EP 16557 3 R CL °SSS 1Rss4 2S 7�57 7ps6 3S> � 31 s 338 PARK LMP 51537 2Ss 1p�3 1 4358 1pS37 S48 1 N 3SR ps42 339 p a%ag3S S3S 9 / ❑ 1p62E 351 y 1psas �p r V ` 257'F ' 10521 N 1pS2E 3¢7 9 ✓ / �, 1p 361 350 1es1>} 52d 10513 342 P 29456 258 / 362 349 psla 10511 10516 10515 RW 66539 — — 3 t65ff3 363 oslp 43 259 1363 t0503 36Q r 3qg CO / M ' / r BCP 8155 t � 3 ,347 I Rem. Pd. A 260 ,10a95 4FH 3S5 0 345 / ^346 — 2 P 10921 1 Rem. Pd. A ' y� 6 9 BCP 8155 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6871 —201 1 Map No. 816 From: Low Density Residential To: C onservation N SCALE 1:2,500 APPENDIX C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. No 6864-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6864-2011" 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 16557) Lot 3 District Lots 406 and 408 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 3825 Lot 9 District Lots 406 and 408 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 29456 Lot 3 Except: Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 16557); District Lots 406 and 408 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 3825 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1544 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-1(Townhouse Residential) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER lost° '0 10717 $} R R a '11 10719 a m Rem Rem 324 ni 3 2 3 LM 1537 10600 1 1069s 07AVE. 10705 50 49 10 106ce 325 2 1069531 L2212-K 010697 51 o ry A 32fi 1 23 24 [21 1003 osea , ,gr' 327 �2 8 0 94 32 48 i0fi06 330 "r 1 6 14 52 1p687 q 3i 3 332 PARK 1067s 1o6a0 1 10683 56 47 i S� ti 2 1n555 BC0P 25367 13 10663 � � 10680 57 r°6j3 f0§72 55 46 7p N 10670 1 10662 37q qVF ti U3 4 5 8 9 10 LMP51538 54 0 53 No- LM 515 2 73 m 11 p 10660 58 z 45 7 a os25 m a N A 12 / 59 v 44 g o 3 3oa r7 10650 106 AVE, e ,� 60 " 106 AVE. ro �mo-m 370 tosao 64 N 65 ro ro� 7°sy2 4 a m 16 m 61 10630 72 c v v yJp \ N 26 25 N SflEi96 n 15 62 a N 66 10627 0 N 73 74 24 17 1°sae Rem 3 10595 oszo LMP51538 ¢o L MP 15 N 105415 23 1p5s0 18 0 P 3825 os163 67 rOs7 71 248 8 tiM� 2 \ 4 � 2S0 83 i0S75 }0565 1057A 19 0 (p t'� 2 ai q� 70 SjS 68 \ 7p�a 22 � v' P C 2S> Osea 20 a U �m 69 r ro56p � 21 A LMP 51539 2S r°sse366 u 3S4 �i EP 16557 s 3 �7 26'77 q a 70s-S rs'°"s� �r'�$grSs 10ss4 - 33g PARK LMP 51537 70 ?S S 7 3Se 7 10548 / r ny r 7 36 CV 10s4z 339 _ I was 8 a � r°5z9 2S6 °its ` 3 ¢ 351 r0 rrys 60 70s36 340 527 10521 N 9 7 1pS 2g 34i I 4 1os s 1 361 350 o _ 258 os13 105 18 342 M P 29456 / 362 349 0 RW 66539 105i1 10516 10509 343 70515 4 ,823 34 p_9,2- 1ps10 P �� BCP 8155 259 5363 10503 364_ 7 3q4 rn / I M A Rem. Pd. A 32 260 j0ag5 4pAP 350 3gr, 347 0 345 / 346 J / 36co -C co P 10921 a1 6 lee '° �yo A Rem. Pd. A a j J 6 2 BCP 8155 0 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6864-2011 Map No. 1544 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) N SCALE 1:2,500 APPENDIX D V a o n R m m A m A o 0 Dm � m _ 0 m om Co Z o C co m m ni � Z Z —rl 2 N n O n z Mi 0 1 w k; e--, `o a rn m r m W N 0 If pr r -n O 0 C a z M m r 'w m Y, C b O Z m W� 0 0m i m N Q o air O. AA FS m� All � m R A � of i9 2� az 4 m c z a A � o � w n APPENDIX E Im P* I0 03 b O J � o m C n m m r rn y C D C) O Z �m r O n �m -moo ML m N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ay9 o�c' 0Dm 00 0o mN o oc `oc om n� >a a a Rl wF I i o- I 0 00� z- m yao- N 0 D r r O 0 C O Z M m r YI m < C) b O Zm W r O 0m �N m N R 0 0 0 0 ���• onm Da wfn o- mo m� �� ov f o� wP _ F o^ zv n F O� x < om z 0 Q OfS SOp O � a0 m0 xE N tD ml O III NO a m m r m < N D �0 O Z Wm r O3 0 "m M j m N O (O U O O O O o; Sp } 0 o mm _ of m 0 om o0 0 rO o O G) 0- Q mg F o` P.-R� r rz vm i� yw i � my_ • - o0 0 _ P Om (b N U|X t `W ► + ■ . � � 2\» \ \�| .O ,4,,§ •: |°; §§ | | 9§ „ E / � � k h | .c . $ R ■ I! R§° f X » \; `�E. q % ( �l,,•• ! \• )` R R J J 2; �| 6® \\R RH ___ _—_ r ___ District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: October 17, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/026/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Rezoning: Final One Year Extension Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6694-2009 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6695-2009 23616 132 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council granted a one year extension to the above noted application on November 23, 2010. The applicant has now applied for a final one year extension under Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. This application is to permit the future development of 12 townhouses in the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and one single family lot under the R-1 (Residential District) zone. An Official Community Plan amendment is required to adjust the conservation boundary around Maple Ridge Park Creek which impacts the subject site. RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, a final one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/026/07 (property located at 23616 132 Avenue) and that the following conditions be addressed prior to consideration of final reading: i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Amendment to Figures 2, 3C and Figure 4 of the Silver Valley Area Plan; iii. Registration of a Geotechnical Report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iv. A Right -of -Way Agreement filed at the Land Titles Office for access to lands to the south; V. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking in the townhouse site; vi. Removal of the existing buildings; vii. Park dedication as required; viii. Road dedication as required. f7- l0i*Rb&9Eel ZF a) Background Context: 1102 -1- Applicant: Don Schmidt Owner: Richard A Wilson, Mark L Isaaks, Rockne C Thomas Legal Description: Lot: 1, Section: 28, Township: 12, BCP Plan: 2637; PI D: 008-584-371 OCP: Existing: Medium / High Density Residential, Conservation Proposed: Medium / High Density Residential, Conservation Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: South East West Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) RM-1(Townhouse Residential), R-1(Residential District) Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Medium / High Density Residential Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Medium / High Density Residential Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Low Density Urban, Conservation Park P-1(Park and School) Park Single Family Residential Multi -Family Residential, Conservation, Single Family Residential 0.678 HA (1.67 ac) 132nd Avenue Full Urban DP/026/09, DP/065/08, SD/026/09 This application is to permit the future development of 12 townhouses in the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and one single family lot under the R-1(Residential District) zone. A significant tributary of Maple Ridge Park Creek runs through the east side of the subject property. Maple Ridge Park Creek is identified on Schedule C - Natural Features Map of the Official Community Plan. The riparian protection area is approximately 2340m2 (0.57 ac) which will be dedicated to the District as Conservation as a condition of zoning the site. A requirement of the development process included the site into a Development Permit Area to ensure the form and character of the development at the Building Permit stage. This development is subject to a Multi -Family Residential Development Permit as outlined in Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan. Some setback and height variances are being sought which will be part of a future report for Council consideration. The following dates outline Council's consideration of the application and Bylaw/s 6695-2009 and 6694-2009: The First Reading report (see attached) was considered on October 19, 2009; -2- - First Reading was granted October 27, 2009 Public Hearing was held November 17, 2009; - Second and Third reading was granted November 24, 2009. - First extension was granted November 23, 2010 Application Progress: The developer is now working out finances to complete this proposal and would prefer to wait until the removal of H.S.T anticipated in 2012. The proponent anticipates more favourable market conditions in the upcoming year and anticipates seeking Building Permit approval by spring of 2012. Alternatives: Council may choose one of the following alternatives: 1. grant the request for extension; 2. deny the request for extension; or 3. repeal third reading of the bylaw and refer the bylaw to Public Hearing. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in general compliance with the land use designation of the Official Community Plan. Additionally, the dedication of approximately 0.57 acre of park land represents a significant long term benefit to the environment and the District in its efforts to achieve a linear park system for habitat protection. The applicant has been working on the completion of this rezoning application and has applied for a final one year extension. It is a ticipated by next year final consideration will be requested. k t 1,' P1 L:i iM Prepared by: Rasika A Planner rya B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED6 AP Appro�ed by, J irfe Ack g, M .C.I.P XFraAk 4Quinq,---) an Approver! c Wb*6 & De►cei`opment Services Concurrence:J. L./(Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - First Reading Report -3- APPENDIX A Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer DATE: October 8, 2009 FILE NO: RZ/026/07 ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6694-2009 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6695-2009 23616132 AVE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family'Suburban Residential) to RM-1(Townhouse Residential) and R-1 (Residential District), to permit the development of 12 townhouses and one single family lot. This application is in general compliance with the Official Community Plan, however, an application to amend the conservation boundaries has been received based on ground truthing by environmental and geo technical professionals. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6694-2009 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and on- going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6694-2009 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a Development Information Meeting, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a public hearing on the bylaw; 3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6694-2009 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6694- 2009 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6695-2009 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing and 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. i. Registration r Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a strictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Amendment to Figures 2, 3C and Figure 4 of the Silver Valley Area Plan; iii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iv. A Right -of -Way Agreement filed at the Land Titles Office for access to lands to the south; V. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking in the townhouse site; vi. Removal of the existing buildings; vii. Park dedication as required; viii. Road dedication as required. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: DON SCHMIDT Owner: RICHARD A WILSON, MARK L iSAAKS, ROCKNE C THOMAS Legal Description: Lot: 1, Section: 28, Township: 12, Plan: 2637 OCP: Existing: Medium / High Density Residential, Conservation Proposed: Medium / High Density Residential, Conservation Zoning: Existing: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Proposed: RM-1(Townhouse Residential), R-1(Residential District) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation Medium / High Density Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Medium / High Density Residential WM East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Low Density Urban, Conservation West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: Site Characteristics Park P-1 (Park and School) Park Single Family Residential Multi -Family Residential, Conservation, Single Family Residential 0.678 HA (1.67 ac) 132^d Avenue Full Urban DP/026/09, DP/065/08, SD/026/09 The entire subject property is approximately 6780 m2 (1.67 ac) in size; however, the actual development area covered under this application is approximately 4160 m2 (1 ac) in size. The site is sloped down across the 2361h Street frontage with the north side of the property being significantly higher than the south.. There is an existing single family dwelling located on the subject property that will be removed as a condition of final reading. There is also an existing equestrian trail located on the south side of 132 Avenue on the road right-of-way. A significant tributary of Maple Ridge Park Creek runs through the east side of the subject property. Maple Ridge Park Creek is identified on Schedule C - Natural Features Map of the Official Community Plan. The riparian protection area is approximately 2340m2 (0.57 ac) will be dedicated to the District as Conservation as a condition of zoning the site. Development Proposal The applicant is proposing to rezone portions of the subject property to allow for approximately 12 townhouse units on a RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) lot west of Maple Ridge Park Creek and one single family R-1 (Residential District) lot on the east side of Maple Ridge Park Creek. Access to both the proposed townhouse site and the single family lot will be off 132"d Avenue. Due to the angle of the creek, the single family lot will be a panhandle lot in order to stay away from the sensitive riparian area and to mitigate any potential negative impacts caused by the residential use. Council Policy no. 6.02 sets out circumstances where panhandle lots can be allowed. This policy specifically notes that panhandle lots are permitted only in a few specific circumstances. In this instance, a panhandle lot can be considered because it "would allow subdivision to overcome a clearly established topographic difficulty"- Maple Ridge Park Creek. Due to the creek, it is not possible for further subdivision in front of the panhandled lot, as such there are no privacy concerns -3- being created and it dL not hinder future access or subdi,, -on potential for the surrounding properties. A right-of-way through the future strata property is required to be filed permitting access to lands to the south allowing for future development potential. The townhouses have been designed in duplex and triplex format, all with double car garages and full driveways. Two additional visitor parking spaces have been provided at the south end of the townhouse complex. A children's play area has been provided located adjacent to the 'green -belt' park conservation area. c) -Planning Analysis: Official C mmuni Plan: The development site is within the Silver Valley Area Plan which forms part of the Official Community Plan. The subject property is located just outside of the 400m defined "River Village" hamlet boundary which is intended to be the main Commercial centre in the Silver Valley Plan. The property is designated Conservation and Medium/High Density Residential. Both the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and R-1(Residential District) zones positively correlate with this designation. This development is in general compliance with the Official Community Plan, however, an OCP amendment application has been received to amend the Conservation boundaries based on environmental and geo technical reports received in the rezoning application. Zoning law: The zone amending bylaw is for the two residential zones, one for single family use: R-1 (Residential District) and one for multi -family use: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). The R-1 (Residential District) lot is required to be minimum 371mz in area and the development proposal currently denotes this lot as approximately 567m2 in area. It will meet the bylaw requirements for its allotted zone. The proponent is requesting several variances for the proposed development on the multi -family site. Variances necessary to support the development as proposed include a reduction to all required setbacks and to increase the building height allowed under the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone. These variances will be outlined in a future report to Council. Development Permits: This development is subject to a Multi -Family Residential Development Permit as outlined in section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan. Accordingly, prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Development Permit must be reviewed and approved. The purpose of a Multi -Family Residential Development Permit is to enhance existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs and minimize potential conflicts on neighbouring land uses. An application for the Development Permit has been received. Adherence of this project to the guidelines of this permit will be provided for Council in a future report. -4- The site is also subject to Watercourse Protection Development Permit. A Watercourse Protection Development Permit is required for all development within 50 metres of the top -of -bank of all watercourse and wetlands as shown on Schedule C, Natural Features of the Official Community Plan. The Watercourse Protection Development Permit is established for the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. It will be necessary for the applicant to obtain a Watercourse Protection Development Permit prior to any works occurring within 50 metres of the top of bank of the _Maple Ridge Park Creek. An application for the Development Permit has been received. Advisory Design Panel: This application was initially reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel at a regular meeting held October 14, 2008. At that time the Panel discussed the application and made several recommendations that were to be addressed by the applicant and brought back to the Panel for review. The application was brought back to the Advisory Design Panel at the February 10, 2009 regular meeting at which time the Design Panel made the following recommendations: That the development be supported with the following comments: • That the applicant further address the elevations to 236th Street and 132nd Avenue in relation to materiality, scale and character; • That the south elevation of Unit Al be addressed in terms of scale, character and materiality; • That it be noted that the comments have been made on the basis of the proposed form, character, materiality and livability, and that the increase in density to this project and the setback variances are supported as presented; • That the applicant submit a set of complete drawings with ,clear labelling of all proposed materials, specifications and dimensions on -all applicable drawings; • That the application is not required to be submitted to the Panel for further review; and • That the applicant submit the revisions to the planning staff. The applicant has provided updated plans resolving the remainder of the Panels concerns. A more detailed report will be forwarded to Council at the Development Permit stage. Develo ment Information Meetin : A development information meeting on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 at Yennadon School Library was held -by the developer and representatives from the builder. As per Council Policy 6.20, invitations were mailed to qualifying property owners, advertisements were placed in the local paper and a notice was attached to the development sign on site. Approximately 4 people attended the meeting with no comment sheets returned. Concerns raised included increased traffic and parking in the neighbourhood. Attendees were pleased that this project would be providing road and intersection improvements and felt that the preservation of the existing horse trail on 132"d Avenue was a positive feature of the development. -5- d) Interdepartmental dications: En ineerin Department: The Engineering Department has identified that all of the services required in support of the rezoning do not exist to the site. It will, therefore, be necessary for the applicant to enter into a Rezoning Development Agreement and post the required security to complete the necessary works prior to final reading. A horse trail must -be provided -on -the south side -of 132^d Street and must -be included in the final civil drawings for the project. Street trees will be planted along the 236 Street frontage, however, there will not be room for trees on the boulevard on 132 Avenue due to the equestrian trail. Two servicing variances have been identified by the Engineering Department. The first Development Variance is required to reduce the carriageway width on 236 Street to 7.3 meters instead of 11 meters as required for multi -family development. The second Development variance in relation to servicing is for the retention of the aboveground utility company plant on 236 Street. It is expected, however, that the existing aboveground utility company plant on the south side of 132 Avenue will be converted to underground systems at the rezoning servicing stage. Fire Department: The Fire Department has no concerns with this development proposal. Parks & Leisure Services Deoartment: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the development is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional 2 trees; final civil drawings will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree and their budget must be increased accordingly. e) School District Comments: A referral was sent to the school district. No comments were received. f) Intergovernmental issues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. g) Environmental Implications: The property is impacted by Maple Ridge Park Creek, the protection area for this watercourse has been established and will be dedicated as park as a condition of zoning the site. A stream restoration and enhancement plan has been received as well as an application for a Watercourse Protection Development Permit. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in general compliance with the land use designation of the Official Community Plan. Additionally, the dedication of approximately 0.234 ha (0.57 acre) of park land represents a significant long term benefit to the environment and the District in its efforts to achieve a linear park system for habitat protection. It is therefore recommended that first reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6694-2009 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6695-2008 and it be forwarded to Public Hearing. A Prepared !n Csikos anning,Technician nning , MCIP - '7a ��' Approved by. rank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Wo & Devel men Services Concurrence: J. L. im) Rule Chi Administrative Officer The following appe ices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - OCP Amending Bylaw 6694-2009 Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw 6695-2009 Appendix D - Site Plan Appendix E - Subdivision Plan Appendix F - Building Elevation Plans/Streetscape -7- 13245 39 P 47603 P 4D9 - c¢ 13260 °,�' 23 24 i1 w w 35 N P 47 M 3 13227 22 Rt 20 Rt tL 13215 34 n 'PP157 SUBJECT PROPERTY � N N N N ,n N M N N N O IG m P 2637 c"v N Rem 1 • t$5 1105 EP 137 # P 2637 1316D 4 k P 11 D5 7 B 13144 LD RK Lo ra 16 7 V) tR PARK T la. 13104 vi 6 P 2 37 N 13084 District of Pitt Meadows .. .Iw.Y.lby 23616 132 AVENUE i2 i� CORPORATION O 15 = y �� THE DISTRICT OF N District Of MAPLE RIDGE I PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley SCALE 1:2,000 DATE: Apr 17, 2008 FILE: lk/026/07 BY: Pt CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6694-2009 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Section 10.3. Part IV - Silver valley Area Plan, Figures 2, 3C, and 4 of the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: . This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6694-2009 2. Figures 2 and 3C of the Silver Valley Area Plan are hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Except: Parcel"A" (Explanatory Plan 13725), South East Quarter Section 28 Township 12 Plan 2637 New Westminster District. And outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 782, copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw, are hereby redesignated as shown. 3. Figure 4 of the Silver Valley Area Plan is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Except: Parcel"A" (Explanatory Plan 13725), South East Quarter Section 28 Township 12 Plan 2637 New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 783 , a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding and removing Conservation as shown. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 200. READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 200. READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of MAYOR , A.D. 200 . CORPORATE OFFICER IV11�1 LL I\IUVC vFri�,ifHL LUMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6694-2009 Map No. 782 From: Med/High Density Residential and Conservation To:FZZ Med/High Density Residential&Z Conservation 1 :2500 o 1 7J2 h ry 21 3 ,_ P 48925 I: 7J2 39 1.214 ho. U 4 P 47603 Im 732 1.222 he. P 4D 78 � I^ 5 5 he, 0.785 he. 73260 23 ^ 24 7 �t i r � W a Im 6 N0.845 he. 1.205 he. 7 J5 P 4 503 17 33 1732 CV 0.429 he. 7J227 A 9 0.429 he. 1r1 — -- - I Um 8. n 22 20 0.809 he. 732 73275 0 34 0.405 no. 0.405 he. I 9 'PP 157 y 0.429 he, h N 132 AVE. 732 AVE. LMP 38113- e v P 2637 h N 73765 0 6 P 1105 EP 13725 A P 2637 JJ760 0-437 he. 4 17 P 1105 8 2.023 he. 0.405 he, Ln PARK 1J744 'n 16 LO LO 2.023 he. 7 � PARK 0.405 he. 3.359 he N N P237 1.202 he. P 12420 7JOBf � 1 II 3 0.809 ha. MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6694-2009 Map No. 783 PURPOSE: ® TO REMOVE FROM CONSERVATION ON FIGURE 4 ® TO ADD TO CONSERVATION ON FIGURE 4 1.2500 r p CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6695-2009 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6695-2009." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Except: Parcel"A" (Explanatory Plan 13725), South East Quarter Section 28 Township 12 Plan 2637 New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line, is hereby rezoned as shown on Map No.1462, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw. 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER ti ry 21 35 39 P 47603 P 40 78 1.222 he. 85 ha. 0.785 he, lJ25D L W Li Ln 33• 35 N P 4 603 0.429 he. 1J127 59 o.az9 he. "' N -- n 22 2❑ lJ27s o_ 34 0.405 ha. 0.405 no. 'PP157 to 0.429 he, _ h ry h 732 AVE. LMP 38113-v 7J16s I r. n ; P 48925 1 .e 14 he, � 4 7.7 +rn cA f 5 rn r^ 23 24 0,545 ha. 1.205 hu. 1J �n7 A 8 O.Bo9 hc. 1 m r� n, ti L ■ 132 AVE. b � h LP 13725 A P 2637 1J760 0.437 he. 4 17 P 1105 8 2.023 he. 0.405 he. 0 PARK lJf4a L0 16 2.023 he. O LO 7 LO PARK 0.405 he. r7l.Z202hu. 3.359 he WP 2 37 13084 ' I P 12420 O.BD9 ha. MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6695-2009 Map No. 1462 From: RS-2(One Family Suburban Residential) To: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) M -R-1 (Residential District) 1.2500 w 0 Z- V) � o v$ o� a) a� ETJ 0 C Oi cts ^00 m 0 .� rrah ttv^^ vl � v1 U E h N G 7ir3t e.�un;'c 'iT �' "+T^'�b: o...,-Ai•..ri. .x -�� - 31m _ Y• 1 1 \ { "I jaa-a5' L1;�9f z 2irc 1 s3 I ` Y• Y � f ' 5 wit 1 � � ! 'c € y � • P P S pg$yy o.�rein3aj;a,�rnmrx= e F 'E ee I F :Ci if L- _y G �I v Z_ yA W. SN'JISICI 2110P 213MId .... .... MITT., Iry I E I =M--:4 man m I.Alul i ERA DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: November 3, 2010 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/026/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Rezoning - First Extension Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6694-2009 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6695-2009 23616 132 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council gave 3rd reading to the above mentioned bylaws on November 24, 2009. The applicant for the above noted file has applied for an extension to this rezoning application under Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. This application is to permit the future development of 12 townhouses in the RM-1(Townhouse Residential) and one single family lot under the R-1 (Residential District) zone. An Official Community Plan amendment is required to adjust the conservation boundary around Maple Ridge Park Creek which impacts the subject site. RECOMMENDATION: That a one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/026/07 and that the following conditions be addressed prior to consideration of final reading: I. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Amendment to Figures 2, 3C and Figure 4 of the Silver Valley Area Plan; iii. Registration of a Geotechnical Report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iv. A Right -of -Way Agreement filed at the Land Titles Office for access to lands to the south; V. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking in the townhouse site; vi. Removal of the existing buildings; vii. Park dedication as required; viii. Road dedication as required. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: ..- Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation East: Use: Zone: Designation West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Don Schmidt Richard A Wilson, Mark L Isaaks, Rockne C Thomas Lot: 1, Section: 28, Township: 12, BCP Plan: 2637; PI D: 008-584-371 Medium / High Density Residential, Conservation Medium / High Density Residential, Conservation RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) RM-1(Townhouse Residential), R-1(Residential District) Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Medium / High Density Residential Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Medium / High Density Residential Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Low Density Urban, Conservation Pa rk P-1(Park and School) Pa rk Single Family Residential Multi -Family Residential, Conservation, Single Family Residential 0.678 HA (1.67 ac) 132nd Avenue Full Urban DP/026/09, DP/065/08, SD/026/09 This application is to permit the future development of 12 townhouses in the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and one single family lot under the R-1 (Residential District) zone. A significant tributary of Maple Ridge Park Creek runs through the east side of the subject property. Maple Ridge Park Creek is identified on Schedule C - Natural Features Map of the Official Community Plan. The riparian protection area is approximately 2340m2 (0.57 ac) which will be dedicated to the District as Conservation as a condition of zoning the site. A requirement of the development process included the site into a Development Permit Area to ensure the form and character of the development at the Building Permit stage. This development is subject to a Multi -Family Residential Development Permit as outlined in Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan. Some setback and height variances are being sought which will be part of a future report for CounciI consideration. -z- The following dates outline Council's consideration of the application and Bylaws 6694-2009 and 6695-2009: - The First Reading report (see attached) was considered on October 19, 2009; First Reading was granted October 27, 2009 - Public Hearing was held November 17, 2009; Second and Third reading was granted on November 24, 2009. Application Progress: The property owner "Gold Creek Developments" recently managed to finance, build, sellout another project (10 townhouses) on 228th Street and are now working out finances to complete the subject proposal. The proponent anticipates more favourable market conditions in the upcoming year. The applicant has completed new Geotechnical analysis for this site; is working on acquiring financing and working on completing the road and park dedication plan, the off -site servicing drawings and other conditions of final reading. It is anticipated that these will be completed by early 2011 and final reading sought by spring 2011 so that the construction can start in summer 2011. Alternatives: Council may choose one of the following alternatives: 1. grant the request for extension; 2. deny the request for extension; or 3. repeal third reading of the bylaw and refer the bylaw to Public Hearing. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in general compliance with the land use designation of the Official Community Plan. Additionally, the dedication of approximately 0.57 acre of park land represents a significant long term benefit to the environment and the District in its efforts to achieve a linear park system for habitat protection. The applicant has been working on the completion of this rezoning application and has applied for a one year extension. It is anticipated that within the next few months final consideration will be applied for. Prepared by. Rasika Achary'W B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEER® AP Planner Approved by. Jane ckering, MCP, MCIP �6ire /ctgr of? mg Approved by,' 7 Frank Qui MBA, P.I-ng Pu" evelopment Services Concurrence: O.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Appendix A - Sulect Map; Appendix B - First Reading Report -3- Appendix A 13295 N 2 13275 " 21 3 13245 B P 480125 13265 38 39 P 47603 U 4 m 13257 P 409 6 5 13260 n 24 13251 �+ 23 0. m 6 w � 13235 m 35 N P 41803 7 32 33 10 n A 13225 PP159 w 13227 V 8 22 20 m 13215 a 13215 34 9 •PP157 SUBJECT PROPERTY 1205 " 132 AVE P 2637 say Rem 1 I 1 • 1105_ EP 13 P 2637 13160 4 P 17 1105 $ PARK 13144 e 16 aZ 7 PARK 4 13104 N � " P 21137 � P 0 13084 , 3 r ■ 70MI y1i1 �ZikL�R t: P 1'fe �J�t i•I NMI r M District of LanSCALE 1 1 RJ P 15 E 15 P12 23616 132 AVENUE 0 * CORPORATION OF y THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Apr 16, 2007 FILE: RZ/026/07 BY: PC 40 MIN MON District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: October 17, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-091-AL FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Application for non -farm use within the Agricultural Land Reserve 11937 260 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received for non -farm use under section 20 (3) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act for a temporary residential use on land that is within the Agricultural Land Reserve. The intent of this application is to retain an existing dwelling for this purpose. RECOMMENDATION: That application 2011-091-AL be authorized to proceed to the Agricultural Land Commission. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses North: Use: Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation East: Use: Zone: Designation West: Use: Zone: Designation Paul A Black Paul A Black, Tara E Black Lot 14, Section 13, Township 12, Plan 38304 Agricultural No Change RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) No Change 3 properties, Rural Residential Use RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Use Agricultural Rural Residential Use RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Use Agricultural Rural Residential Use RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Use Agricultural Rural Residential Use RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Use Agricultural 1103 Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: a) Project Description: Rural Residential No Change 0.9 hectares (2.2 acres) 260 Street Community Water, Septic This application proposes to retain an existing house for temporary residential purposes. The reason for the temporary residential use is to provide a residence for a respite care worker to assist with the applicant's large family during a unique situation of need. The family was in the process of building a larger house for themselves and their four children with the intention of demolishing the existing house upon completion. Due to extenuating circumstances, the family has adopted a sibling's children, as the sibling was unable to adequately care for the children. These children have been traumatized due to their earlier experiences and require a great deal of support. As a result, the family is in need of assistance, and has found a suitable person who is able to provide additional care on an ongoing basis. This request is therefore for the retention of the existing dwelling as a temporary residential use during this period of need. b) Planning Analysis: Temporary residential uses are permitted in the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw and in the policies of the Agricultural Land Commission. If this application complied fully with Commission policies, an application to the Commission for non -farm use would not be required in order for the proposal to proceed. However, this application deviates from District practice and Commission policies due to the structure type (existing single family home versus manufactured home) and the way that a relative is defined. Agricultural Land Commission Policies: Under Commission Policy #8, permitted residential uses in the Agricultural Land Reserve include the following: (i) one secondary suite within a single family dwelling, and (ii) one manufactured home, up to 9 m in width, for use by a member of the owner's immediate family; Section 1 (1) "immediate family" means,with respect to an owner, the owner's (a) parents, grandparents and great grandparents, (b) spouse, parents of spouse and stepparents of spouse, (c) brothers and sisters, and (d) children or stepchildren, grandchildren and great grandchildren; The intended person for this proposed use does not meet the Commission's definition of a relative, which is one of the reasons why this non -farm use application is required. The other reason is that the proposed structure type is the existing single family home as opposed to a manufactured home. The Commission also requires that once the dwelling is no longer needed for the temporary use, that it be removed, demolished, or decommissioned. -2- Commission Policy #10 establishes guidelines for the construction of a new house on a property within the Reserve where another residential use exists. It states: • where there is one existing residence on the parcel; • the existing residence will be demolished, moved off the property, or made uninhabitable upon occupancy of the new residence, and • a bond or Letter of Credit and an affidavit (or such other assurances as determined by an authority issuing the building permit) ensuring demolition or removal of the initial residence, or that the initial residence is uninhabitable, has been posted with the authority issuing the building permit. In cases where the initial residence and new residence are to be used for and are necessary for legitimate farm purposes, no application is required. However, an application to the Commission is required if there is an existing residence on the parcel, the existing residence will be retained and inhabited and the additional residence is not required for legitimate farm purposes. From these policies it is clear that the Commission permits temporary residential uses and would consider the retention of an additional dwelling on a property if it was accompanied by a non -farm use application. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw The Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw defines a relative as follows: means a person related by blood, marriage, adoption, or foster parenthood, and includes one or more full-time domestic servants. A person who assists with child care in the family home could fit the definition of domestic servant as contained within the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw. It is noted that this proposed temporary residential use is to house someone who already has full-time employment elsewhere within the community. It appears contradictory to consider this arrangement would be considered as temporary housing for a domestic servant. However, it can be demonstrated that this use could fit the definition of domestic help as provided by senior government agencies. The provincial statute, the Employment Standards Act, does not establish a minimum number of hours worked in order for a domestic employee to be considered full time. In the absence of a provincial regulation, the federal threshold of 30 hours per week is an appropriate measure to consider. This number is provided by Human Resources and Skills Development Canada for their Live-in Caregiver Program. Based on a 7 day work week, 30 hours a week would amount to between 4 and 4.5 hours per day involved in childcare, assisting with meals, and housework. It is highly feasible that someone could provide assistance to a family of this magnitude while still holding a full-time job elsewhere. On this basis, this proposed use can fit this definition. The Zoning Bylaw makes allowances for allowing dwelling units other than a manufactured home for a temporary residential use. It states: A lot 0.4 hectares or greater in area may have a Temporary Residential Use contained within the same building as the One Family Residential Use; a self contained mobile home certified under certificate Z240 by the Canadian Standards Association; or any other dwelling unit designated as a Temporary Residential Use by the Director of Licenses, Permits and Bylaws or his/her designate. Rem This section of the bylaw is being reviewed for compliance with the existing legislation of senior agencies. It may be revised as a result of this review. The intended structure for a temporary residential use is a manufactured home. However, the bylaw does reflect an intent by the District to consider alternate dwelling structures where practical. The main reason why manufactured homes are preferred for this purpose is that they may be removed more readily when they are no longer required for their immediate purpose. In addition, there are other safeguards to ensure this use remains temporary may be found in the following section of the bylaw: ...the property owner will enter into an annual Temporary Residential Use agreement with the District of Maple Ridge for a fee of $30.25; and the Temporary Residential Use will be removed within thirty days of the relative no longer residing on the property; It is recognized that there may be instances in the community where a dwelling unit already exists on a property, and may be considered suitable for this temporary use. In these instances, there may be some scope for permitting the retention of these structures, subject to the same restrictions as a manufactured home. Viewed in this context, it may be seen that this application, while unusual, still complies with the Zoning Bylaw with respect to use and structure type if appropriate approvals are granted. c) Interdepartmental Implications - Building Department: The subject property is serviced by septic and community water. Prior to permitting both structures to be used for residential purposes, the applicant will have demonstrated adequate septic capacity for both structures. d) . Alternatives: As with all applications to the Commission, Council has the option of denying, this application from proceeding further, in which case it is effectively denied. In such a circumstance, the applicant would have the opportunity to use other provisions of the bylaw, such as a secondary suite, to meet this need. In the case of denial, the existing dwelling would have to be either demolished or decommissioned as a habitable space. CONCLUSION: This application for non -farm use complies with Temporary Residential use provisions within the Zoning Bylaw, but not with Commission policies for residential use. The Temporary Residential Use is not a usual situation, but is based on need, and Commission approval may be granted on compassionate grounds. It is understood that the use described in this proposal is of limited duration to meet this period of need. It is anticipated that the duration of this use, if allowed by the Commission, would be defined through dialogue between the applicant and the Commission, and established as a condition of approval. On this basis, the application is recommended to proceed to the Commission for their approval. ME /�)'W\ Prepared by: Diana Hall Planner Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PI, MCIP Acting Director of Inning Approved by: /Frank Quinn, MBA, P. f G ' Pubfic orks & Concurrence: J. L/ (Jim) Ruld Ch of Administrative Officer pment Services The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Site Plan as provided by the Applicant I'Z CI f Pitt 1 Mea lows �' _ ,+ L N I `' -- SCALE 1:2,500 1 District of Langley I RP 11633 rn v M Q. RP 11413 N G1 9 I 11880 I ! . I ! f 10 I 1.150 I I i I „ 11840 f ! I I 12 1 l 1 N ! 11808 � C: 11937 260 STREET f � o � CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE � I � PLANNING DEPARTMENT I - DATE: Jul 25, 2011 FILE: 2011-091-AL BY: PC I_1»:1►111PAv 3 O O r, V J'41 • �` l�� y�f o ckfw ._' b,.[- ' B I E R 0 D E S I G N 1( 34 2 2D Sf MAR kG� ®rWEET 891 ---���.----72� f , lWoveeJ� Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: October 17, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: DP and DVP/031/08 Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Development Permit and Development Variance Permit 22606, 22612 and 22618 119 Avenue; 11876 and 11866 226 Street; and 22611 Selkirk Avenue. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Development Permit application and a Variance Permit application have been received for the above mentioned properties to regulate the form and character of the proposed mixed -use buildings. This application is to permit future construction of two buildings (Building #1 with 62 units on lot A and Building #2 with 34 units on lot B) with ground floor commercial and residential above, under the C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) zone. The C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) zone allows apartments as a principal use. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan and the Town Centre Area Plan. This report will address the requirements of Section 8.11 of the Official Community Plan for the Town Centre Development Permit Guidelines. Council gave Third Reading to this proposal prior to the Town Centre Plan adoption, so the design may not comply fully with the Town Centre Development Permit Guidelines. The project was delayed due to the changing market situation and is now seeking final approval after getting two extensions. A Final Reading report for the rezoning application (RZ/031/08) is anticipated to be considered by Council at the meeting on October 25, 2011, along with this report. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/031/08 respecting property located at 22606, 22612 and 22618 119 AVENUE; 11876 and 11866 226 STREET; 22611 SELKIRK AVENUE; and further That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/031/08 respecting property located at 22606, 22612 and 22618 119 AVENUE; 11876 and 11866 226 STREET; 22611 SELKIRK AVENUE DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: WES FRIESEN of POINTS WEST ARCHITECTURE MAINSTAY HOLDINGS LTD; STACKS & DECKER DEVELOPMENTS INC AND FALCON HOMES LTD. Lots 10, 11, 12 D.L.: 401, Plan: 7997 and Lots 12, 13, 14, D.L.: 401, Plan: 9190 Town Center Commercial 1104 Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation East: Use: Zone: Designation West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Previous Applications: b) Project Description: Town Center Commercial RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Residential and 119th Avenue (vacant currently) RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Commercial and road Commercial and Selkirk Avenue C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Commercial and road Residential RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Commercial 226th Street and Commercial C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Commercial and road Vacant Multi -family residential with Commercial on ground floor 4099 m2 (Lot 1=2671 m2 and Lot 2=1428 m2) 226th Street and lane Full Urban RZ/031/08 The location of the project is in the heart of the Town Centre Area next to the Maple Ridge Bus Terminus and the Haney Place Mall. This proposal aligns with Council's vision of densifying the civic core area to help revitalize the downtown area and provide a supportive population base for local businesses and transit. Two four -storey buildings have been proposed, separated by a lane in between. Building one on Lot A, with 62 units and Building two on Lot B, with 34 units are proposed, giving a total of 96 units with retail commercial use along 226th Street. Building one comprises of 316.54 m2 of retail commercial space on the ground floor and 3,746.23 m2 of residential space on the main floor and above (29 two bedroom units and 32 one bedroom units). Building two comprises of 346.04m2 of retail commercial space on the ground floor and 2,334.57 m2 of residential space on the main floor and above (34 two bedroom units). All residential parking for both the buildings is underground to minimize the impact on the streetscape and disruption to pedestrians; the access to the underground parkades is from the lane. The lane is anticipated to be widened to 7.5 metres with sidewalk on the northern side (Appendix E), for safe access to the under -ground parkades of both the buildings and for pedestrian use. The visitor parking and all the commercial parking is proposed on Lot A with a "Shared Parking Agreement Restrictive Covenant" registered on title. Pedestrian access to the two buildings is from the entrance lobbies facing 226th Street. Service areas and refuse are oriented away from the street to minimize visual impact and avoid conflict with pedestrians. -2- c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan & the Town Centre Area Plan: The subject properties are strategically located near the Maple Ridge Bus Loop and Haney Place Mall, within the Central Business District of the Town Centre Area and are designated "Town Centre Commercial" in the Town Centre Area Plan. The proposed C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) zoning aligns well with this designation. This designation permits multi -family type of housing form or mixed -use developments and is intended to promote compact and vibrant commercial/mixed-use form of developments that are pedestrian -friendly. The Town Centre Area Plan encourages higher density residential development and a range of housing forms in the core area. Development in the C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) zone within the Town Centre Area is required to be a minimum of three storeys. This proposal of two four storeyed buildings with smaller unit sizes ranging from 43.6 m2 to 71.5 m2 is contributing to achieving this residential density and providing more affordable housing within the town centre area. The Town Centre area is divided into seven precincts and the subject site lies within the Civic Core Precinct. Civic Core Precinct - Town Centre Development Permit Guidelines: The Town Centre Development Permit Guidelines are meant to provide possible design solutions for achieving architecture and site -related development objectives. Developments proposals within the Civic Core Precinct Town Centre Development Permit Guidelines are being assessed against the following key guidelines: Promote the Civic Core as the "heart" of the Town Centre The location is within the civic core, close to all amenities and public transit. The proposed mixed - use buildings provide an opportunity for a live -work type scenario, which is a very suitable land -use for lands within the civic core. .• Create a pedestrian -oriented, boutique -style shopping district Road dedications along east side of 226th Street, south side of 119th Avenue and both sides of the lane. Included are off -site upgrades such as bike lane, street trees, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb - bulges and benches to improve the pedestrian experience while shopping. The design shows pedestrian access to the residential units above, from central lobbies facing 226th Street. In addition to this, a covered arcade provides opportunities for a pedestrian friendly interface. • Reference traditional architectural styles Materials proposed include: brick veneer & glazed facades for the commercial component, to create a visually pleasing faQade at the human -eye level. • Capitalize on important views Units above the second floor enjoy some views of the mountains. -3- • Enhance existing cultural activities and public open space Due to the location of the proposal close to the Haney Place Mall, the ACT and Leisure Centre, it is anticipated that these mixed -use buildings will promote and participate in cultural activities. • Provide climate appropriate landscaping and green features The proposed landscape plan shows native trees, shrubs and ground -cover that are easy to maintain and absorb rain -water. The proposed trees are both shade -giving and ornamental in nature. • Maintain street interconnectivity Street connectivity is anticipated to be enhanced by two new pedestrian crossings along 226th Street, sidewalks along east side of 226th ; south side of 119th Avenue; north side of Selkirk Avenue and a wider, upgraded lane in between the two proposed buildings. d) Zoning Bylaw: Residential Component: The proposed C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) zone allows apartments as a principal use with a basic residential floor area of the proposed building not to exceed 1.0 times the lot area, except that this may be increased by 0.3 times the lot area if underground parking is proposed and an additional 0.25 times the lot area for storeys above the second floor. This proposal has underground parking and four storeys in both the buildings so they qualify for the maximum density of an FSR of 1.8 times the net lot area as stated above. Based on the net lot area for each building, the proposed maximum residential net floor area for Building # 1 is 3816.33 m2 and the proposed residential FSR is 1.53. Similarly the proposed maximum residential net floor area for Building # 2 is 2359.66 m2 and the proposed residential FSR is 1.79. Commercial Component: The commercial density is dependent on satisfying the parking spaces and loading/unloading area required for the commercial use in the proposed zone. Three small commercial units are proposed in each building, facing 226th Street with a total Commercial gross floor area of 315.39 m2 in Building # 1 and 363.23 m2 in Building # 2. The permitted total lot coverage is 90 % in the proposed zone. The two buildings are proposed on two separate lots hence the total lot coverage is calculated per lot. Lot coverage of 46% has been proposed for Building #1 on Lot A and 59% has been proposed for Building #2 on Lot B. Building #1 is an L-shaped structure and proposes some setback variances facing 226th Street, 119th Avenue and the lane are proposed, while the interior side yard setbacks are minimized. Building # 2 is a rectangular shaped structure and proposes some setback variances facing Selkirk Avenue, 226th Street and the lane. The setback variances proposed are noted below. Variances to the Zoning Bylaw: The applicant is seeking the following setback variances for Building # land 2: Building # 11on Lot A): a) A 6.0 m rear yard setback for main and second floors (required is 6.0 m which can be zero setback only if a parking structure or deck is proposed above it which does not apply to this development; proposed setback is 0.0 m) ; ME b) A 5.5 m front yard setback for the third and fourth floors (required is 7.5 m above the second floor for residential use and proposed is 2.0 m); c) A 7.5 m rear yard setback for third and fourth floors (required is 7.5 m above second storey if the building is used for an apartment use but proposed is 0.0 m); d) A 4.5 m interior lot setback on the fourth floor (required is 4.5 m above the third storey and proposed is 0.0 m) and e) A 2.3 m exterior side yard setback on the fourth floor (required is 4.5m and proposed is 2.2 m). Building # 2 [on Lot B]: f) A 6.0 m rear yard setback for main and second floors (required is 6.0 m and it can be zero setback only if a parking structure or deck is proposed above it which does not apply to this development; proposed is 0.0 m); g) A 5.5 m front yard setback for the third and fourth floors (required is 7.5 m above the second floor for residential use and proposed is 2.0 m); h) A 7.5 m rear yard setback for third and fourth floors (required is 7.5 m above second storey if the building is used for an apartment use and proposed is 0.0 m); i) A 4.5 m interior lot setback on the fourth floor (required is 4.5 m above the third storey and proposed is 0.0 m) and j) A 2.3 m exterior side yard setback on the fourth floor (required is 4.5m and proposed is 2.2 m). The above noted setback variances are with an intention to articulate the facades better and avoid staggering the units above. The variances will create building forms better able to enclose the abutting streets and avoid building voids that have proven vulnerable to water penetration of the structures. Off -Street Parking & loading Bylaw: This proposal is subject to the revised minimum parking standards applicable within the Central Business District of the Town Centre Area due to its location and because it qualifies for the Town Centre Incentives Program in Sub -Area 1. For a mixed -use building, as per Section 10.2 of the Maple Ridge Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw #4350-1990, a minimum of 0.8 space per unit is required for a studio apartment which increases by 0.1 space per additional bedroom. Based on these parking standards, the residential component of Building # 1 on Lot A, comprising of a total of 62 units (33 one bed room units and 29 two bed room units), this project requires 59 residential parking spaces and 4 visitor parking spaces. Totally 73 residential parking spaces are proposed in the under -ground parkade of Building # 1 and 4 visitor parking stalls at grade. The residential component of Building # 2 on Lot B, comprising of a total of 34 units (all are two bed room units), requires 34 residential parking spaces and 2 visitor parking spaces. Totally 41 residential parking spaces are proposed in the under -ground parkade of Building # 2. The 2 visitor parking stalls for Building # 2 are provided on Lot A (clubbed with visitor and commercial parking spaces of Building # 1) with a "Shared Parking Restrictive Covenant" registered on title. As per Section 10.3 of the Maple Ridge Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw #4350-1990, for the Commercial component, a minimum of 14 commercial spaces (7 spaces for Building #1 and 7 spaces for Building #2) are required. All 14 spaces plus one loading space are proposed on Lot A, behind Building # 1 with a "Shared Parking Restrictive Covenant" registered on title. -5- Section 10.3 of this bylaw also specifies long-term and short-term bicycle parking required for all developments within the Town Centre Area. Based on the ratio of 6 spaces for every 20 units, 19 short-term bicycle racks are required for Building # 1 and 11 short-term bicycle racks are required for Building # 2. These have been proposed in a well -lit area visible to pedestrians and cyclists, facing 119th Avenue and 226th Street (Appendix E). Based on the ratio of 1 long-term parking space for every 4 units, a minimum of 24 long-term bicycle storage lockers are required for both the buildings. 45 bicycle storage lockers have been proposed within the underground parkade. e) Advisory Design Panel: On August 12, 2008 the Advisory Design Panel reviewed the proposal. The panel had the following recommendations for revision: • Review of the street tree species, structural soil and paving assembly to ensure long term street tree health; • Improve layout of the amenity space; • Design of the building interface units with the lane and car park ramps; and • Continuity of the colonnade. Based on panel's resolution, the applicant has made some revisions to improve the amenity space and the streetscape along 226th Street, street trees species, continuity of design elements, continuity of the colonnade and a covered walkway for pedestrians by recessing the elevator shaft. The applicant has also proposed covering the ramp to the underground parkade and some areas of the at grade parking, with a trellis to improve the visual aesthetics. f) Intergovernmental Issues: Approval from the Ministry of Transportation was received in December 2008. g) Citizen/Customer Implications: The mail -outs to inform residents of the proposed setback variances were mailed 10 days prior to the anticipated Council Meeting date. Concerned residents in the neighbourhood have had the opportunity to voice their opinions. h) Financial Implications: In accordance with Council's Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of the estimated landscape cost will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on an estimated landscape cost of $70,387.72 dated October 03, 2011, by DMG Landscape Architects, the security will be $70,387.72 prior to issuance of a Development Permit and a Development Variance Permit. There will be trees added to the municipal street tree inventory on completion of this project. The costs associated with maintaining these trees will need to be included in a subsequent operating budget. M !) Alternatives: Under Section 919.1 of the Local Government Act and Section 8.11 of the Official Community Plan the property has been included in the Town Centre Development Permit Area. Council approval is required for the Town Centre Development Permit as presented in this report prior to a Building Permit being issued. Not approving this proposal would result in a consolidated piece of land remaining vacant within the town centre area and may add to enforcement issues around squatters and the homeless. CONCLUSION: The proposal is centrally located close to the Maple Ridge Bus Loop, served by public transit and close to all the amenities such as the Mall, Leisure Centre, the ACT and local shopping areas. It is compatible with the surrounding uses and fits well with the policies of increasing residential density within the Town Centre Area as stated in the Official Community Plan and the Town Centre Area Development Permit Guidelines. The ground floor commercial combined with residential units above promotes some live -work options suitable to the location. The proposed variances do not negatively impact the neighbours. Therefore, it is recommended that DP/031/08 be approved. k4"q'_ Prepared by asika Ach a B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED® AP Planner Approved by: _JaP5VPickering,, MCIP AVector of PI in by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PXfig GM: Publiclprks Deve! ment Services Concurrence: J. U. (Jim) RUI6 Cflef Administrative Officer I , The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B -Under-ground Parking Plans Appendix C - Site Plan Appendix D - Building Elevations & Sections Appendix E - Landscape Plan & Details -7- 11 99 6 Z v0o P 63 IL McINTOSH AVE. SELKIRK AVE. 13 P$ 15 11837 N 6 7 Lo 79 10 12 P 8615 11 (t1 N N N N Plan 4834 LOUGHEED HWY. P 4834 N SCALE 1:1,500 LMP 15424 A SUBJECT PROPERTIES P 12�40 2 m I! 2 1 APPENDIX 20. 3 a CL 11947 OD 00 O n �• Diem 2 CO d �- 11937 *PP088 11931 Rem. 1 Plan 81350 ED N N co co o cc11909 m F10 r0 N to w m NCo A 11 12 13 14 15 16 B P 7997 P 7997 C 11889 AtiF (n N N w w w F- U) r- N N T C� G � J I I I j S J — --p - tncno- - -- - -- f P' -� i 22606/12/18 119 AVENUE, 11866/76 226 STREET & Cn 22611 SELKIRK AVENUE r� �F- o CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF - J_�-i a District of 1 1' -~ Ili r MAPLE RIDGE Langley I r— r: PLANNING DEPARTMENT y--'{ DATE: Oct 28, 2010 FILE: RZ/031/08 BY: PC 12 1876 P 91 0 6 13 15 16 17 18 19 cY) 11869 1866 rn 14 5 to to coOo r N N N N (7 N (7 N C. N 11857 N N N N N SELKIRK AVE. 111334 1 4 2 P 13017 P 86 5 P 76002 15 r m 20 21 A 16 1 o rn N V 0 V co z Cr3 f Z N N N N JJ APPENDIX g w 8p r rip F F ' L g a 33 ° il: > E+� .0 4 , .. . 2 Qi a e a m O r- - - - - - - - - — -- - --- -- -- --- -- - ---� �.> \? • r k � I N 1 1I � QJU W Z 1 °Q° I O r j lu A ul z fs I i I -. _. -. - . -. -._. - - -- -. - . - . -. :i n N:] A V b l l | ||| |§# ml § • !S aM SIu|O d ocr mmM.M ,y2 \ (5 w!)§§ m� 2ƒq /;;,§§! :3 I _ APPENDIX C a7P10.- 3 L� BW swv-wwoa xri na ro,omww =ise-�/Oi 31pk i8 AaMPtl'M OEW - BOL I� 1 3FifLL'J3L'o' 0 i IW � m Q IsannHoHsIuiod z IM � � n8� mum-- �� � r a.. a°i. .y w 93 pm— Pu4 ash �3 n N D A V b 1 1 9 y_� 0 0 o S E a< u g 0 E-0 Q m � � APPENDIX D r yy oa ro,•m000v �y�Z{N 9%P10P100 3JdN IB bWR!'M 0lId-80L �h 1 Isom sju i od 6 m T— " ■M■ ti t ' �'a�9 �I�li�ligl •' I—I Ilf"iI.S'I.15i i 111 l� 31111�1� ■w� 3ill� ■o �!I!e ■� •j �f'i■�=ice AI� it1A w 'I�� :■— i■• a■=3 lid a0= flfl1 0 - Ililll111111 Ilpllnl9 V!+,�, � �® _ ��"' 1 �.■� lwf ■� �5, ■Idra ■w■ [w■ ■m ■ ■w 1 ■m ■■1 C III ■r■r ■1 . ■M = ■M ■w _ _ _-•nll[1 IIIlIIIEIII IIIIIIIIIII AI �— ill `w -m :� ■ a o 0 1 0 Sm 1a • ��i[:=_III;; EVEM IIIlIlIII[ IIII " _ — 'lyil5l ■ NOR 1111 Illlllllllp 111�II�➢''�V�� '= ; ■= o■ _; 9■- �' �, INNER 0- m � ■■ ■ e ■w ■w16� :il;�il!I ;� �: ��s;;il;.if 1- _ � —.. E�I ■. ■mogi . r�i■ iifi.=, ri Ilill'. - ■� ■� ■";I ■■w � 1 : all INMEIIIIII� I�IE(il'E�; 5€a;i��'ill� � RonSM , am am _ llllllllllll I ill IiIIIU ;;�i�. —' — ma �Id Ali; �p,�'I!jJll;6 � ' i ■__ '-■� ? ■� 1 1 �1 ♦ Ci ♦ ♦ P ?3 �3 T 3�„HCHV Isem sluiod 4 m N MIS M p ���yy g co 9 ii= ®tiL—HE asd Q O Md. an I !C ]Illlll[ilrl IIII�I�II� i ON 0 - Il111111111 1111111111lY I: � snlre - r Ru^^ !■=1 1! IlllIEl[[III IIII[IIIEIII � c ill �f;l �I:l H IHiIIIP.2171A�o gr�-__ i --_ 0.2 ■ ■� — lilllllHlllf lllElln IS'rl!liill?I' =_7 Ff ■■Ff= am I; I,I; - IJ!illlf l!I!y Ems - am 1 �� �� �� !� Illllllllllll IIIIlIIIlII I�!III!!II�h INEW '_ _ -- — Illl�llllill fllllillllll yR ;llf it r J l f Fall.II �I e4; 3df R.UHOUV w Q q Isann sluiod§s A ■1 y !'�s ■1 LL t$. 3 �al ' ��► III ITI��� �i`��lili;;i,�i6 �. rl�l i E!!I I! c Ell I mom E.7� ■■ IE!■ I ■■ lily - �" — �nlllolil€ lolulnl � �ni �� _ . r� ���■�I`i�rj r■li ■■yam jli��li �I IIn I911.1111111291 r � li��i9;;����6 �j�j' I' . r� i r[■ r> I .�ii�I1 lilfll@Ill _ 1111711�I li Illlll o o I��I�I _ — - �•■� ■� ■� !�ii�, IIIF?l�l I ' . — ImlllnH I€€lmml I€�ii€ �_ _.mnl IlIIIIHIII IINIE;"IggI!l§!lil1 i11 ,T�■� ■� ■� j�jj -f ;� ly �� �_�r� rrw r� I�11 ■� ■. i ■. ■. IiI -� _ __ I Illbllln IIlI➢II II Shc� •■■ ■■ r■ I ■Gn C�] � JI'�' Ii�3� i ■■ ■■ ■■j;��:!k+ w!14�;1Io!'I"3i� ==,a... a�rrovaierax�isrwu:a�iaw.�r,�w�; ��miv�cse�uiwa a I€ e [1 irx¢es:vnswi�oevrxxm,:onran: r_x I�€€Till � Y�JIyiR = 1111111111f1 lillllllll , _ �j ■■ RI� ■■ �I ■■ � �,', y�� r 14I!' , -- IIIIEIIIII IRIIIlllilt!` it l`=,IIhI!N; i� , V� :■ ■�rn.I rt i :ail;slill;j;;:;il A■ M l it 11 !I!I[IIINI IlAllll - — IIlIllllni IIIIIHI 11 IN��� 11"��II!fllilli :III° I .. az APPENDIX D N Isam "sluiod a Ui Rol ga c�0, o moa-r � T ���� 3FiflL�31JH�b' `•� M � y � Q Isem sjuiod 4 0 s pp IL�� aIL FL Jim €kk FP U J J 2 j t t F ly d g i i � K d 3 A �m w in §} n e . /§§ !b § �� � , �� - §(\ � �■ �§I`!!�� � /`■ 1 j +H-0 i§I ) APPENDIX E e 3.�| §| ! �\ � , - ! §.i | \ o�� � { T�l I |||; I §\ Deep Roofs Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: October 17, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: ITT-OP11-052 E08-010-055 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: COW Award of Contract for Tender of the Albion Dyke Upgrade EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In 1992 the District of Maple Ridge, by Provincial Order in Council, was appointed as the receiver for the Albion Dyking District. Under a separate report a status update has been provided to Council on the continued dialogue with the Province with regard to the ownership of the dyke and the requirements to bring the dyke up to current standards. The District of Maple Ridge, on behalf of the Albion Dyking District, collects a specified tax from properties protected by the dyke. These funds are placed in an account and are to be used for maintenance and repair of the dyke. Currently there is $550,000.00 in the account. Since the freshet event in 2007, the District of Maple Ridge has continued to perform annual inspections of the Albion Dyke. A post 2011 freshet inspection noted areas of the dyke requiring maintenance and repair. The work involves the removal of vegetation and the placement of fill and "rip rap" on the river side of the dyke to protect the dyke embankment. Tenders for the work were received on September 29, 2011. The lowest tender for the work is in the amount of $434,273.10. An expenditure of this amount would deplete the reserves and leave no monies for other work such as pump replacement or emergency repairs. Under the terms of the tender documents, the District of Maple Ridge has re-scoped the work and negotiated a revised price with the lowest tender in the amount of $224,999.97. The revised scope of work includes the most urgent sections requiring repair and will provide the most benefit in the event of a future freshet. It is recommended that the contract be awarded in this amount. RECOM M EN DATION(S): That the contract for the Albion Dyke upgrades be awarded to Double M Excavating for the amount of $224,999.97 (excluding tax) plus a contingency of $20,000.00 and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign the contract; and further That staff be authorized to invoice up to $260,000.00 to the Albion Dyking District collected by the Tax Rates Bylaw No. 6742-2010. Page 1 of 3 1105 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Since the freshet event in 2007, the District of Maple Ridge has continued to perform annual inspections of the Albion Dyke. The 2011 inspection noted areas of the dyke requiring maintenance and repair. Based on these inspections it was recorded that parts of the dyke needed to be armoured against future freshet events. Over the years vegetation has grown on the river side of the dyke to the extent that it now should be removed and the dyke armoured with large rocks in the form of "rip rap". A design for the work was completed and tenders issued on September 19, 2011. b) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Tenders for the work were received on September 29, 2011. The lowest tender for the work is in the amount of $434,273.10. An expenditure of this amount would deplete the reserves and leave no monies for other work such as pump replacement or emergency repairs. Because this is maintenance and repair work it does not qualify for infrastructure grant funding. The tender documents include the following clause; The Owner may, prior to and after contract award, negotiate changes to the scope of the Work, the type of material, the specifications or any conditions with the low tenderer or any one or more of the tenderers without having any duty or obligation to advise any other tenderer or to allow them to vary their tender prices as a result of such changes and the Owner shall have no liability to any other tenderer as a result of such negotiations or modifications. Accordingly the District of Maple Ridge rescoped the work and negotiated with the low tenderer, Double M Construction. The revised expenditures are estimated to be: Revised Tender amount of Part 1 for -60M of repairs and upgrades $191,693 Additional work that would not be covered by Tender $ 7,764 Tender amount for Environmental Planting 25,543 Subtotal for Tender Upgrades (excluding tax) $225,000 Estimated contingency $ 20,000 Estimated engineering costs to complete $ 10,000 Total (taxes excluded) $255,000 It is recommended that these expenditures be funded from the Albion Dyking District reserve funds. This is the type of work for which the annual dyking taxes are being collected. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: This project is important for the protection of the Albion Dyking District. Properties which comprise the Albion Dyking District will be notified prior to commencement of the work. Page 2 of 3 CONCLUSION: This maintenance and repair work is required to protect the existing dyke structure in the event of a future freshet. It is recommended that the work proceed. Should Council authorize the work to proceed repairs will commence in October 2011. Prepared by: Bernie Serne, AScT, Superintendent of Sewers Appro vor Thompson, CGA Manager of Financial Planning Approved by: Ceri Marlo, CIVIC Manager of Legislative Services Approved by. Frank Quinn, MBA, R. n general ra ger Public Works and Development Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Page 3 of 3 f ; Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: October 17, 2011 and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council Workshop Club Climax - Liquor License Application - Extension of Hours of Operation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB) has received an application from Club Climax at 11935 207th Street for an extension of their hours of operation. The purpose of the increase in hours of operation is to provide service to their customers directly after normal working hours at 4:00 p.m. where currently they cannot open until 7:00 p.m. One of the considerations utilized by the LCLB in reviewing an application for occupancy increases of a liquor primary license is a resolution from the local government. A number of regulatory criteria must be addressed in the Council resolution as well as comments pertaining to the views expressed by area residents. Council may choose to support the application, not support the application or indicate they do not wish to comment. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. That Council supports the application by Club Climax at 11935 207th Street Maple Ridge for an extension of hours of liquor service to 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. 7 days a week as an amendment to Liquor Licence No. 213427, the existing Liquor Primary Licence based on the information contained in the Council report dated October 17, 2011. 2. That a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch in accordance with the legislative requirements. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: In April 2011 Club Climax submitted an application (Appendix 1) to the LCLB for an extension of their hours of operation to their Liquor Primary License for their facility at 11935 2071h street. LCLB has completed their initial review of the application and have determined applicant suitability and eligibility for the establishment type. The Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw does permit a liquor primary establishment at this location and the business has a current and valid Business Licence. The premises in question is fronted by 207th street between Lougheed Highway and Dewdney Trunk Road and is primarily surrounded by commercial utilized property. The attached map (Appendix II) compares the subject site to the surrounding neighbourhood. The second phase of the application process is the gathering of public input on the application request. 1106 surrounding neighbourhood. The second phase of the application process is the gathering of public input on the application request. The LCLB guidelines request a specific Council resolution commenting on the application in terms of community impacts which may occur as a result of the proposed change to the establishment operations as a result to the proposed change to the Liquor Primary License at this particular location. Part of the process requires Council to gather views of the residents who may be affected by the establishment of the liquor primary license in their neighbourhood. In following the public input requirement, 527 letters were sent to owners and occupants of property within approximately 300 metres of the subject site with the vast majority of the recipients being residents and the rest of the property owners showing as registered companies. There were three responses to the 527 letters sent to surrounding property owners and occupants. These responses are attached as (Appendix III) for Council's reference. The District also posted a public notice in the local newspaper running two separate editions in the week of October 5th and 7th 2011. There was one telephone enquiry in response to this advertisement for the purpose of seeking clarification on how to address Council on this matter. The Maple Ridge RCMP Detachment was asked for their input on this matter and they have confirmed they do not have any operational issues with this application however they did note that this particular establishment does not currently participate in the District's Bar Watch Program. The applicant was asked about the possibility of participating in Bar Watch in the future and she confirmed that it was her intent to re-establish contact with the program in the near future. There is adequate parking, on the subject property to satisfy municipal parking requirements for this proposed additional use. The access road to the property, 207th Street, has steady traffic due to its commercial location and the fact the subject property is located on a section of the street directly between Lougheed Highway and Dewdney Trunk Road. It is not anticipated that increasing the hours of operation for this business by 3 hours in the late afternoon is going to make any noticeable change to the parking, traffic or noise generation in the area. The three closest liquor primary licensed premises to the subject property are: • Fox's Reach at 20398 Dewdney Trunk Road, whose current hours of operation are 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight Sunday to Thursday and 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday; ■ Houstons Pub and Grill at 21525 Dewdney Trunk Road, whose hours of operation are 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight Monday to Thursday, 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday and 11:00 to 12:00 midnight on Sundays (this facility is currently closed for renovations); By Baily's Pub at 11232 Dartford, whose hours of operation are from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight Monday to Thursday, 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday and 11:00 a.m. to Midnight Sundays. Staff recommend Council approve this licence change to the hours of liquor service request based upon the following: this is an existing licensed establishment that is requesting a small increase of 3 hours a day to their operation; consideration of the fact that the three other closest licensed facilities currently have considerably longer operating hours; it is not anticipated that there will be any noticeable change to the parking, traffic or noise generation in the area should the licence change to the hours of operation be approved. b) Desired Outcome(s): That Council support the application from Club Climax to extend their hours of operation as requested. c) Intergovernmental Issues: Both local government and the provincial government have an interest in ensuring that liquor regulations are followed and that licenses establishments have the support of their communities. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The review of this application has taken into consideration the potential for concerns from surrounding business and residential properties in terms of parking, traffic and noise generation as well as the proximity of schools and similar establishments. e) Interdepartmental Implications: The Licensing, Permits and Bylaws Department has coordinated in the review process and solicited input from the public, other municipal departments as well as the RCMP. f) Alternatives: To not approve the application or to provide conditions to the approval. CONCLUSIONS: That Council pass the necessary resolution supporting the application from Club Climax as submitted based upon the staff findings set out in this report. Prepared by: and Bylaws Approved 1jfi: Frank Quinn Gendral ana r: Publ' Wo and Development Services Concurrence: J.L. Jim) Rule Chi f Administrative Office AUG-25-2011 09:19 Frorn:LIQUOP LICENCING 2503566971 T o: 616044677329 A p p e n d ix �Rt"T'DST-i IIn- I'vAr 71.3ci: an Parch DATE: August 25, 2011 FROM: Liquor Control and Licensing Branch Name: Trish Howell Phone: (250) 952-7055 Fax: (250) 952-7034 TO: E.S. (Liz) Holitzki Phone: 604-463-5221 Fax: 604-467-7329 No. Pages:9 COMMENTS: letter of extension & application for change of hours for LP i# 213427, Club Climax, Maple Ridge, BC per our email conversation today. Thank You Trish Howell Material Contained in the fax may be confidential, and should be delivered only to the Addressee. If all pages are not received please call (250) 952-7055. Ministry of Liquor Control and Mailing Address: Public Safety and Licensing Branch PO Box 9292 Stn Prov Govt Solicitor General Victoria BC V8W 9,18 Telephone: (250) 387-1254 Facsimile: (250) 357-9184 Location: Fourth Floor, 3350 Douglas Street Victoria BC V8Z 31-1 http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/Iclb/ O7: IIJ r rOm: LI UUUK LiUtNUiNU ri 1 O : bIGU44b (r. 1:1' 7 DI2I 171 S t "thy Tiry T'lacr an I-irth August 24, 2011 E.S. (Liz) Holitzki District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Dear Ms. Holitzki: Job # 710033-25 Email: Holitzki@mapleridge.ca Re- - Request for an Extension on Recommendations and Comments Establishment. Club Climax Liquor Primary Liquor Primary Licence # 213427 Thank you for your August 19, 2011 email, regarding an application to extend the hours of sale at the above -noted establishment. The letter requested an extension of the time allowed for the submission of recommendations and comments by local government. The request has been considered and an extension is approved. The Liquor Control and Licensing Branch will anticipate a resolution by October 28, 2011. Sincerely, Trish Howell Case Manager cc: Rick Farina, Inspector Linda M. Morrison, 0849929 8C Ltd (Email: lindamm9876@shaw.ca) Ministry of Public Safety Liquor Control and Mailing Address: and Solicitor General Licensing Branch PO Box 9292 Stn Prov Govt Victoria BC VOW We Telephone: 250 952-5787 Facsimile: 250 952-7066 Location: 41" Floor, 3350 Douglas Street Victoria BC http:// www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/lclb HUIn-t—_­L011 Uy: ly r r om: LiUUUN L1l zNk_1rA0 c �kU_ )bby (1 BRI77SH immi COLUMBIA �t oe Eadi RECEIVED APR 2 8 2011 MAPLE RIDGE i idle L nrnu�rw • nv . . I o: G1bU1414b ( Imo. }'y Application for a Permanent Change to a Liquor Licence All Licence Types _•'•_••'•" �^•"" - L�4V.+Vr1\(VI CI1N L![rq T1S Ir7 La r017T1 LLL,pVIL FILLING OUT THIS FORM: Complete all applicable fields then submit with payment as outlined in Part 14 of this application form. • If you have any questions about this application, call Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB) toil -free at: 1 866 209-2111. • LCLB forms and supporting materials referred to in this document can be found at www.pssg.gov.bc.callclb For the purposes of this form: • The term Licence includes cortscate or appointment to operate an on -site oroH-site retail storm The term Licensee includes appointee authorized to operate an on -site or off -site retail store • The terms Premises and Licensed Establishment includes on -site or off�ite retail store Licensee Information Licensee name (as shown on licence]: Irj ` 'lt! Establishment name [as shown on licence]: ca Establishment Location address I l � ? 5 2 7'� 1-, � ,.f. e z : ` �v , i � 14 <1 G (3 � zX i x III 1 (as shown on licence): stem City Provinea Postal Code Business Mail addres I _ (K di@erent from abovo): (1 �-� J (� u.�� V U r•'1 J� /� l 5`5 i -� Street City Province Postal Code Business Tel with area code, �- v 'r % Business Fax with area code: Business e-mail: I I Y1;�;J I/)1 ✓r1 "�'� �� `1 ✓rife% ; ��� Contact Name 1 l r� jj�Title/Position: Oar 4C r 1r r v U;t I first l mpadte Type of Change Requested Please check 0 appropriate box(es) below and provide lioenee numbers affected for each requested change. You may complete more than one change section on this form. An incomplete application will be held for a maximum of thirty (30) days. If still incomplete after the thirty (30) day period, the application may be terminated. Type of change requested Licence numbers affected MANDATORY JOB NUMBER ofte Use OW Y F_ 1. Internal Transfer of Shares (p_2) Includes Internal Ama mation) (C2-LE) F_ 2. External Transfer of Shares (p.2) (Cl-LE) F_ 3. Change of Directors or Officers (p.2) (C1-1-E) r 4. Name change, person (p.3) (C2-LE) F_ 5. Name change, licensee - corporation (p.3) (C2-LE) r 6. Name change, licensee - partnership (p.3) F (C2-LE) )— 7. Name change, licensee - society (p-3) (02-LE) 8- Establishment or licence name change (p.4) (C2-LIC) (sub) F_ 9. Addition of receiver or executor (p.4) (C2-LIC) (sub) r 10. Food -primary entertainment endorsement (p.5) (C2-LIC) (sub) Fx 11. Change to hours of sale (p.6) 3 (C3-LIC) (sub) r 12. Request for change in terms and conditions (p.6) (C3-LIC) (sub) REFER TO PART 17 TO SEE THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR CHANGE YOU NAVE REQUESTED LCLB012 (Last updated to February 2011) I pplieat f! LIQUOR CONTROLS LICENSING RECEIVED MW t 7 MAY 11 2011 .;2S__ PSI V Ctpau 8C Huu-e.z�-,full 0y:1'J rro(n:l_iuuut< L1l zM-iNh cm ••U5�1bGy(1 10:u1t)U'+4b((151f7 r'.4"7 PART 1. INTERNAL TRANSFER OF SHARES C2 - LE Fee: $110 per licence x lioenoes = $ Private corporations only. To be completed when shares have been transferred within the licensee corporation or a holding company within the licensee corporation, but no new shareholders have been added. This section to be completed by third party operators (private corporations) when an internal share transfer occurs. Please attach the following: ❑ Signed minutes/resolutions of meeting during which each share transfer or issuance to new shareholder took place ❑ Updated Register of Members (shareholders) Q Updated Register of Directors and Executive Officers Also complete Parts 13 and 14 PART 2. EXTERNAL TRANSFER OF SHARES Fee: $330 per licence x licences = $ C1-LE Private corporations only. To be completed when new shareholders have entered the licensee corporation Or a holding company within the licensee corporation. This section to be completed by third party operators (private corporations) when an external share transfer occurs. Please attach the following: 0 Signed minutes/resolutions of meeting during which each share transfer or issuance to new shareholder took place O Updated Register of Members (shareholders) 0 Updated Register of Directors and Executive Officers ❑ If new shareholder is a corporation, attach the Certificate of Incorporation, Memorandum of Authorized Capital, Resolution(s) allocating shares to all current shareholders and the Current Register of Members. Note: As an altemative to the above corporate documents, applicants may submit a letter from a B.C. lawyerproviding all ofthe essential information contained within the documents See 'Lawyars Latter aveilable on LCLB's website publication index. ❑ Completed Consent for Disclosure of Criminal Record Information (RCMP GRC3-%4) for all required individuals. (Please note: You must complete Pads 1, 4 and 5 of the Ganwnf for Disclosum form and all category boxe3 must be inttiatted in suction 5) Refer to the LCLS web page for information on criminal record searches - www.pmg.gov.bc-caAc[Wlicansing/criminal-records.htm ❑ Completed Personal History Summary and Consent for Criminal Record Search (LCL8004) forms for all required individuals. (-1 Statutory Declaration must be Completed by all individuals that answered "yes' to 2, 3 or 9 in the Personal History Summary and Consent for Criminal Record Search form. ❑ Photocopy of primary proof of identity for each of the above individuals. Acceptable photo identification includes a drivers licence From a Canadian jurisdiction, passport or BCID card. Also complete Parts 13 and 14 PART 3. CHANGE OF DIRECTORS OR OFFICERS (--Cl-1LE for Corporations and Societies Fee: $110 per licence x licences = $ To be completed when there are changes in directors or officers of a corporation or society within the licensee legal entity. Note: If an internal transfer of shares accompanies this change, only complete and pay the internal share transfer application fee. Please attach the following documents, and the additional documents below according to type of legal entity: O Completed Consent for Disclosure of Criminal Record Information (RCMP GRC3S84) for all required individuals. (Please note: You must complete Hart 1, 4 and 5 of the Consent for Di&cbsura form and all category boxes must be initialled in seaon 5) Refer to the LCLS web page for information on criminal recortl searches - www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/ICIbAieensing/criminal-recards,htm ❑ Completed Personal History Summary and Consent for Criminal Record Search (LCLB004) forms for all required individuals. Q Statutory Declaration must be completed by all individuals that answered "yes" to 2, 3 or 9 in the Personal History Summary and Consent for Criminal Record Search form. ❑ Photocopy of primary proof of identity for each of the above individuals. Acceptable photo identification includes a driver's licence from a Canadian jurisdiction, passport or BCID card. ❑ Private corporation: Updated Register of Directors and Executive Officers Public corporation; ❑ Notice of Directors ❑ List of Executive Officers Cl Societies: Current list of Officers and Directors Also complete Darts 13 and 14 Page 2 of 9 AIECEIVr:D MAY 11 2011 PM VICTORIA 8C HUU-e.�-cUl1 UIJ:cU I-rom:Li000t1 Lll-tNl-INU cf>U1�:•bbyfl 10:b1tU'4+b((.ally r'.�D'y PART 4. PERSON'S NAME CHANGE — Sole Proprietor, Partner. Shareholder, C2 . LE Director, Officer (All licence classes) Fee. $110 per licence x licences = $ To be completed when a person holding an interest in a licence has legally changed his or her name. Person's name (in fill) LAST NAME / FIRST NAME / MIDDLE NAME Name changed to (in full). UST NAME / FIRST NAME / MIDDLE NAME Please attach the following: ❑ Copy of Certificate of Name Change, Marriage Certificate, etc. Also complete Parts 13 and 14 PART S. LICENSEE NAME CHANGE LZ' u Corporation Name Fee: $110 per licence x licences = $ To be completed when a corporation with an interest in a licence has legally changed its name, but existing corporate shareholders, directors and officers have not changed. Current licensee or holding Company name (in full): Name changed to (in full): Please attach the following: n Copy of Certificate of Incorporation showing change of name. Also complete Parts 13 an0 14 PART 6. LICENSEE NAME CHANGE Partnership Business Name Fee: $110 per licence x To be completed when the legal name of a partnership is changed but no new partnem are added and no existing partners are deleted. Current registered partnership name (in full): Name changed to (in fun): Please attach the following: ❑ If a registered partnership, a copy of a partnership registration document from the 8C Registrar of Companies showing the change of name. ❑ If the partnership is not registered, provide a legal document showing change of name. Also complete Parts 13 and 14 PART 7. LICENSEE NAME CHANGE Society Name Fee: $110 per licence x licences = $ To be completed when the legal name of a society is changed, but the society stnicture, membership and certification number on the certificate of incorporation does not change. Plca3e note: A Liquor -Primary Club Licence held by a society is void if the society and its membership ceases to exist. (Liquor Control and Licensing Act, Section 24) Current registered society name (in full): Name changed to (in full): Please attach the following: ❑ Copy of Certificate of Incorporation under the Societies Act showing change of name. Also complete Parts 13 and 14 L.ialoR CONTROL & uCENTM RECEIVED PSI VaMIA9C Page 3 of 9 HU0 -_--eU11 Uy: cfU r rprn: LiUUUK Lil,t:M_lr`Rn (I 1 0 : b1bU44b f (,�cfy r. b/ ti PART 10. FOOD -PRIMARY (restaurant) ENTERTAINMENT ENDORSEMENT Please choose (one only) the type of entertainment applied for, ❑ (a) Patron non -participation entertainment endorsement (musicians, etc.). ❑ submit a letter of intent describing, in detail, the form of patron non-Darticipation entertainment proposed. Fee: $110 per licence x licences = S 0 ❑ (b) Patron participation entertainment endorsement (dance- Floor, karooke, etc.). This antertaiment must end by midnight ❑ submit a letter of intent describing, in detail, the form of patron participation entertainment proposed. The letter of intent must address; the potential for noise, the impact on the community and whether the endorsement may result in the establishment being operated in a manner that is contrary to its primary purpose; and ❑ request a local govemment/First Nation resolution commenting on the application (local government must complete Part 16 of this form; for further information on local government resolutions, read Part 15). • If applicable, complete the appropriate Application for a Structural Change (LCLB012a or LCLB012c) and include any requests for changes to licensed capacity. If you are requesting a change to your establishment's hours of liquor sale in conjunction with the entertainment application, complete Part 11 of this form. Any requests for Food -Primary hours of liquor sale later than midnight require a local government/First Nation resolution supporting the application. There are restrictions related to forms of entertainment, sound systems, etc. If you are uncertain about any of the details Of your proposal, please consult with licensing staff at LCLB in Victoria (see contact information on page one). Fee: $330 per licence x licences = S Note — When relocating a Food -Primary establishment An endorsement for patron participation entertainment cannot transfer location without local govemment/First Nations comment and LCLB approval. This is required because the local govemment/First Nation must be provided an opportunity to reconsider the impact of the endorsement on the community given the establishment's new location. Use this section to reapply for the endorsement but do not pay the application fee(s). Are you submitting an application to transfer the location of a Food -Primary licence with this application? ❑ yes ❑ no Also complete Parts 13 and 14 UQU(),R CONTROL & us RECEIVED MAY 11 2011 5of9 UJ: tl r- ro(n: L1l UUK Lil zM-iNla (1 1 U: d1bL' 41it ( r.)L7 t'. ('y PAR? 11. CHANGE TO HOURS OF SALE (Liquor -Primary, Liquor -Primary Club, Food Primary & Winery endorsements) Pursuant to Section 12(3) of the Liquor Control and Licensing Act, the general manager may limit the days and hours that an establishment is permitted to be open for the sale of liquor. Hours of liquor sales for Food -Primary establishments must be in keeping with the dining habits of the clientele expected. Liquor must not be served unless the establishment is open for the service of a varied selection of menu items. Licensees may apply to revise hours of sale, subject to any restrictions within the Liquor Control and Licensing Act Regulations, branch policies and/or original terms and conditions of licensing. In some instances, the general manager of the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch may require the licensee to post public notices before a decision to alter licence hours is considered. Check (.") the appropriate change, and provide the requested information and documents: O (a) Food -Primary — request to change hours of liquor sates before midnight: complete proposed hours of sale table below Fee: $110 per licence x licences = s 0 (b) Food -Primary — request to extend hours of liquor sales later than midnight (Note: patron participation entertainment must end by midnight) O complete proposed hours of liquor sale table below, and ❑ request a local government/First Nation reaolution commenting on the application (local government must complete Part 16 of this form; for further information on local government resolutions, read Part 15) Fee: $330 per licence x licences s $ (c) Liquor -Primary, Liquor -Primary Club or Winery Lounge — any change to hours of sate (earlier opening or later Closing) Fee: $330 per licence x licences complete proposed hours of liquor sale table below, and ❑ fevuest a local govemment/First Nation resolution commenting on the application (local government must complete part 16 of this form; for further information on local governmentlFirst Nation resolutions, read Part 15) Please complete the table below, indicating proposed hours of liquor sales and days closed. Current Hours of LlquorSale: y Monday T Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Open 1r;:]� �7Tuesday P­� Tit,) f _Too en, oo'c Close d)"% Urr'1 2,r GM Z.&:' Ct-1 L oo G-' Z'�o qn, ZQr) Proposed Hours of Liquor Sale; Monday Tuesday Wednesday T ^Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Open 4-co Pn-1 q;W rm 46� ('n ��)' PM 4.OJe/I► e;n LJ;'1) per... Close 7a) Oln Lim (34 ,Z,(-xf (lm 21;Le q m ?_"ik) ern 2'dQ Qrn Reason for change in hours; ]�c i 1� - ��.i 9 � cp a Ii.C..A, N I 6 To� 2 F aryl � �thplic'atiion? Are you s bmittin an a lication to trans er the tion f a o rima licence O yesoo Note — Relocating a Food -Primary establishment An endorsement for hours of liquor service after midnight cannot transfer location Without local govemment/First Nations comment and LCLB approval. Use Pan 11b (above) to reapply for the endorsement but do not pay the application fee(s). OR, use Part 10b (on page 5) to reapply for Patron Participation. Also complete Parts 13 and 14 PART 12. REQUEST FOR A CHANGE IN TERMS AND CONDITIONS C3 - uC Fee: $110 per licence x licences ' $ This section may be used for special requests to the general manager of LCLB for exceptions to policy related to the terms and conditions of a liquor licence. Please attach: 0 A letter of intent describing, in detail, the proposed change to your licence and the reasons for the Also complete Parts 13 and 14 t~It]UOR C "4MOL ff UCEN6rnW O P 6 of 9 MiAI 11 2011 HULn-c::,-tUll UJ: tl t- rum: LlUUUK L1l tNI, 1N0 L:>U.3�Abby (1 1 0 : bIbIJ 1f4b ((3ty t . b/ y PAR 13: DECLARATION My signature (the licensee's) below indicates I understand and acknowledge: Ail of the information given is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. Section 15(2) of the Liquor Control and Lkansing Act states, "A person applying for the issue, renewal, transfer or amendment of a lioenc a who fails to disclose a material fact required by the form of application or makes a false or misleading statement in the form of application, Commits an offence'. Signature of appticant9 (signature of signing officer of a company or society, sole proprietor or all individuals in a partnership): Name Sign at Position held Date LAST NAME ! FiRSTINIAME I MIDDLE NAME / M I UD I YY tA$T NAME / FIRST NAME I MIDDLE NAME LASTNAME I FIRSTNAME I MIDDLENAME'__­ LAST NAME / FIRST NAME I MIDDLE NAME MM I DD / YY arm / go I YY MM 1DD/YY PART 14: APPLICATION FEES - Payment Options Fees may be paid by cheque, money order, debit or credit card. Debit transactions can only be made in person at the Victoria Head Office. See contact information on page one. Submit the payment with the application form. Do not mail cash. Eneilosed payment Is by (check one): cheque, payable to the Minister of Finance (a $20-00 NSF fee will be charged for NSF cheques). ❑ money order, payable to the Minister of Finance. ❑ VISA L-1 MasterCard Credit Card number - - Expiry date: . MM ! w Name of cardholder (as it appears on card)* Signature of cardholder: - If paying by credit card, the applicant may MAIL this application form, or TELEPHONE LCLB Head 0liice directly to provide the credit card number and expiry date. ❑ 1 am paying by credit card and will contact LCLB with my -card number TOTAL FEE SUBMITTED $ SUBMIT FEE AND APPLICATION FORM TO VI .7DRIA OFFICE ONLY: Mailing address: Drop off location Liquor Control and Licensing Branch Liquor Control and Licensing Branch PO Box 9292 Stn Prov Govi Second Floor, 1019 wharf Street Victoria, BC V8W We Victoria, BC V8W 2Y9 UQWR CONTROL & LIGF 5Rw Page 7 of 9 peeHIVBO MAY 11 2011 PM vc"IAIC HUI3-L�,-L!011 UJ; Ll r r0(n: L1000h: L1ltrA-iNU 0 : t1t)U1+1+G ( (JLIJ r'.'J"i PART 15: LOCAL GOVERNMENT/FIRST NATION RESOLUTIONS: Information for the Applicant For the following change types, a resolution from your local government or First Nation, commenting on the application, is required: • Par 10(b): 1`000-primary patron participation entenainment endorsement • Parts 11(b) and 11(c): Change to hours of sales Licensee responsibilities: • Fill out appropriate change application sections in this form. • Request your local govomment/First Nation sign and date Part 16 of this form. • Provide a photocopy of this form to the local government/First Nation and request that a resolution be provided within 90 days and sent directly to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch, Victoria Head Office. • Send the original form and application fees to the branch. • The Liquor Control and Licensing Branch will follow up with the local government/First Nation if a resolution has not been received by the branch within 90 days of the local government's receipt of your request. Your local government/First Nation may decide that it does not wish to provide comment on your change request. However, they must still provide a resolution stating this decision and this resolution must be submitted to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch. For more information on resolutions regarding B.C. liquor licences, please visit the LCLB Web site publication index to consult the guide Role of Local Government and First Nation at http:/Awww.PSV.gov.bo.c.aAcib/Publicationsfindex.hbn PART 16: LOCAL GOVERNMENT/FIRST NATION CONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT OF APPLICATION To be filled out by your local government or First Nation office in relation to sections 10(b), ti (b) and 11(c) of this form. Local government/First Nation (name): Local police jurisdiction: Date: Name of Official (printed): Position: LAST NAME / FIRST NAME I MIDDLE NAME Signature. This application serves as notice from the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch that an application for a permanent change to a liquor licence is being made within your community. The Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB) requests that a resolution commenting on the application be sent to the LCLB Victoria Head Office within 90 days of the above date of receipt If more than 90 days is required to provide a resolution, please contact the branch to make a request to the general manager for an extension. If the local government/ First Nation decides not to provide comment. a resolution indicating this decision must be provided to the branch. Please be advised that if the LCLB does not receive a resolution or a request for an extension within 90 days, the general manager is authorized to review the application without a resolution, considering factors (a) through (d) below, and make a decision about the application. All of the items outlined below In points (a) through (d) must be addressed in the resolution in order for the resolution to comply with section 53 of the Liquor Control and Licensing Regulation. Any report presented by an advisory body or sub -committee to the council or board may be referenced in and attached to the resolution. (a) The potential for noise if the application is approved (provide comments). (b) The impact on the community if the application is approved (provide comments). (c) Whether the amendment may result in the establishment being operated in a manner that is contrary to its primary pur- pose (provide comments only If the application is from a food -primary licence for an extension of hours of service past midnight or the addition of patron participation entertainment). (d) The views of residents if the licence amendment may affect nearby residents (describe the views of residents, the method used to gather the views and provide comments and recommendations with respect to the views. If the views of residents were not gathered, provide reasons). For more information on resolutions regarding B.C. liquor licences, please visit the LCLB Web site publication index to consult the guide Role of Local Government and First Nation at http://www.pssg.gov.bc.r-aAr)b/publicabonsfindex.htm po pL a MI p,gce�v�o MAY 11 2011 Page 9 of 9 /APNCj 1u1n 11 -�'tiiw t r �vr�mx a I 1i .�•�skill_ Ih Mtn - �6a SCALE 00 ., 1 Igig 0 - } The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy or present status of the information shown on _ this map. i ,- 11935 207 Street 11 ! U) lrf j I� — I'Ln DATE: Oct 12, 2011 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE LICENSES, PERMITS & BYLAWS DEPT. BY; DT Onto 7. 2011 4;20PM u0, Appendix III District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC Canada V2X 6A9 Attention: RECEIVE® OCT 0 7 mi LIOENS MAPLE S PERMRTS GE & BYLAWS I am writing again the request for the Club Climax establishment located on 207th Ave in Maple Ridge to extend their hours from 7:00 pm to 4:00 pm. My reasons are there are three establishments wlthln a 4 block radius already offering the same service. They are the Buffalo Club, Fox's Reach, Houston Pub and Grill (located on Dewdney) and By Bally's Pub located across from the CanFor sawmill. At this time there is not a need to open earlier as there are a lot of options available within a 4 block radius. Why do we need more?? Regards ,5 - IMAYOR Cheryl Ennis From: _ Sent: October-09-115:26 PM . To: Mayor Council and GAO Users List Subject: Liquor primary license application (club Climax) Mr. Mayor and Council, I recently received your Public Notice stating that Club Climax situated on 11935 207 St., Maple Ridge has requested new hours of liquor sale. I consider myself and my family affected by this application because not only we have to live so close to this immoral business that now they even want to open earlier. I have always asked myself how a business like this can be so close to a resident area and schools. When we bought our house on _ _ , we did not notice that we were going to live so close to this kind of business. My wish is that this business can be situated somewhere else or close their doors. For all the people that visit this kind of place, they should have it in their own backyard if they like it so much. Thank you, RECEIVED AT C FP T I C)N ID E S K 0 ET Council of the District of Maple FUdge Action:' 11149195 Haney Place, ivlaple Ridge v BC Canada V2X6A9 RE, Public Opinion on Proposed Charigges to the LiquorPrimary License Application for, Club Climax -1.1 19335 207t�', Street, Maple Ridge D,aar Council: I want to praise district staff for having accepted this application because it opens ,the door for District Council to do something - do something about patrons arriving and departing from the above mentioned establishment. In my opinion, the patrons arriving and departing from the above establishment are cons, ared a public nuisance. It's my hope that District Council makes an order to increase police presence cluringthe Applicant's business hours - increased police presence to help move patrons off the streets. The cost of increased police presence could be downloaded onto the Applicant, and in turn, the costs could be raflected in the Applicant's liquor sale prices, Thank you for the opportuni�tj to present my opinion. RaS,PeCtfUlly YOUrs Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: October 17, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001 Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W The Royal Canadian Legion - Remembrance Day Parade EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A letter has been received from the Royal Canadian Legion - Maple Ridge Branch #88 to use municipal streets for the annual Remembrance Day Parade on Friday, November 11, 2011. The east -side of 224 Street from 121 Avenue to Selkirk Avenue and Brown Avenue from Garden Street to 224 Street will be closed from 10:00 am to 12:00 noon. A copy of the request is attached. The Royal Canadian Legion, granted the Freedom of the District, has permission to host the parade in Maple Ridge. The District requires that the conditions of Schedule `A' be fulfilled. RECOMMENDATION: This report is submitted for information only. 1Q61010Ri; IL61►>8 a) Background Context: The Royal Canadian Legion acquired from Council, the Freedom of the District in 2004. While this allows the Legion to hold such parades in Maple Ridge, there are conditions to host the event (these are attached as "Schedule A"). The Royal Canadian Legion will be closing the east -side of 224 Street, from 121 Avenue to Selkirk Avenue and Brown Avenue from Garden Street to 224 Street from approximately 10:00 am to 12:00 noon for their annual Remembrance Day Parade. Access for vehicles will be detoured during this time. The parade participants will leave the Legion Hall, located at 12101 224 Street, at 10:30 am. The parade will then proceed southbound on the east -side of 224 Street to the Cenotaph at Memorial Peace Park. Once the ceremonies are complete, the procession will then return to the Legion Hall finishing at 11:30 am. The organizers will also close the underground parkade exit to McIntosh Avenue and Fraser Street at Dewdney Trunk Road during the event. b) Strategic Plan: The Remembrance Day Parade will help commemorate and remind the public of the sacrifices and selfless dedication of our armed forces as well as promote community development, celebrate community accomplishments and highlight Maple Ridge's spirit. 1107 c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Use of municipal streets may cause some delays and inconveniences to other road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the Royal Canadian Legion. In addition, the organizers will be requested to distribute an information letter to affected businesses and residents. d) Interdepartmental Implications: The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain approval of the RCMP and Fire Department for traffic control and must notify BC Ambulance Services as well as coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company. e) Business Plan Implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. f) Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is granted under the Freedom of the District. CONCLUSION: From time to time, municipal streets are used for various events and activities. The Remembrance Day Parade has been held in Maple Ridge successfully for many years and the organizers have permission under the Freedom of the District to hold the event on municipal streets for 2011. Prepared by: M=r4Wn ng, AScT. T Tec, Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA,;-ffn General l ana r: ) Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule ' Chief Adininistrative Officer AW/mi orks & Development Services Schedule'A'To Council Memorandum Dated October 17, 2011 Royal Canadian Legion - Maple Ridge Branch #88 Annual Remembrance Day Parade Conditions of Approval In support of the annual Remembrance Day Parade, the District of Maple Ridge requests the organizer to: 1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the RCMP, Fire Department and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District); 2. notify local Ambulance Services of the event; 3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; 4. obtain any required permits from the District of Maple Ridge Parks and Leisure Services Department for park facility use; 5. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses of the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date); 6. notify surrounding businesses of pending road closures, by letter provided by the District on behalf of the organizer; 7. must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times; 8. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any way connected with the event; 9. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District." Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; and 10. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the District. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw this permission to use municipal streets should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements. Chief Administrative Officer The Royal Canadian Legion MAPLE RIDGE BRANCH 88 B.C./ Yukon Command 12101 - 224th Street, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6B7 �. Office: 604-463-5101 Fax: 604-466-3032 E-mail: legion88Ltelus.net Website: www.legion88.ca ' 2� C�L�T 0 '::_�11 September 29, 2011 Michael Eng, Engineering Dept., District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9 Dear Mr. Eng: The Maple Ridge Branch of the Royal Canadian Legion will be conducting its annual Remembrance Day Parade on Friday, November 11, 2011 between the hours of 10:30 AM and 11:45 AM down the east side of 224"' Street between Brown Avenue and the bandstand. We will advise B.C. Transit, Maple Ridge Fire Dept. and the B.C. Ambulance service of the time and route of the parade. Also enclosed is the required insurance coverage of $5,000,000 comprehensive general liability naming the Corporation as an additional insured. In order to meet the approval of the engineering department of the District of Maple Ridge we include the approval of the traffic control plan by the RCMP. I trust the above meets your requirements. Thank you. Yours truly, Shawn Ro mson Secretary Manager Form "A" Details of event: Date: November 11, 2011 Contact Person: Shawn Robinson Phone: 463-5101 Fax: 466-3032 Details: Annual Remembrance Parade, Friday, November 11, 2011 leaving the Legion at 121201 — 224`hh Street at 10:30 AM. Parade leaves 224th St. at Brown Avenue and travels down the east side of 224th Street to the Cenotaph at Memorial Peace Park. Ceremonies take place until 11:10 AM. Parade then leaves Cenotaph and retraces route to Legion, arriving at 11:30 AM. 224th Street from Dewdney Trunk Road to Cenotaph will be closed during the duration of the parade and ceremonies. Sketch of Traffic Control Plan SEE ATTACHED PLAN 224th Street RCMP concurrence for the proposed Traffic Control Plan CpL M Sommft, C3014 FIMpOwdom RM XNi The following will be advised of the event: BC Transit, Maple Ridge Fire Dept. BC Ambulance Services r—a--o•—•—••••••»t••,..,vs. i.aaYw�a\IU�GOL OG1 GoP-Sle. Address Maple Ridge, BC �Maps Cana of 1 9/23/2008 8:06 AM The loyal Canadian Legion MAPLE RIDGE BRANCH 88 B.C./ Yukon Command 12101 - 224th Street, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6B7 Office: 604-463-5101 • Fax: 604-466-3032 • Lounge - 604-463-9342 E-mail: legion88@telus.net - Website: www3.telus.net/legion88 September 9, 2011 Maple Ridge Fire Department, 22703 Dewdney Trunk Road, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 3K3 Dear Sirs: The Royal Canadian Legion Maple Ridge Branch #88 will be conducting the annual Remembrance Day Parade on Friday, November 11, 2011 and wish to notify you that the east side of 224th Avenue from 121 st Ave. to Selkirk Ave. will be closed from the hours of I OAM to Noon. We also invite your participation in our parade which will form up at 10:00 AM and leave the Legion at 10:30 AM en route to the Cenotaph and Memorial Peace Park. Thank you. Yours quPp 3iffi MacDonald, President Page 1 of 1 Ruby Tam From: Mark Smitton Sent: September 26, 2011 12:09 PM To: Michael Eng; Ruby Tam Subject: Nov 11th raod closure Attachments: 09-26-201 1.pdf Received acknowledged and approved Ata)& Smattm Assistant Fire Chief Fire Prevention/Communications www.maple ridgefire.ca 604-476-3053 26/09/2011 COiY1 CU Cana DATE (MMIDDIYYYY) ID a CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 9/28/2011 INSURANCE IS PROVIDED BY LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA (HEREINAFTER Policy 1919597 CALLED THE INSURER). Number: This is to certify to: Policy Effective Date: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, CITY OF PITT MEADOWS, SCHOOL DISTRICT 42, (MMIDDYYYY): 04111/2011 AND MAPLE RIDGE PARKS AND LEISURE SERVICES COMMISSION Policy Expiry Date: that policy of insurance herein described has been issued to the Insured named below and is in force at this dale. (MMIDDnYYY): 0411112012 Name of Insured: ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION #88 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND Address of Insured: 12101 224 St, MAPLE RIDGE, BC V2X687 CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. Location and Operations to which this Certificate applies: THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR AS REQUIRED FOR REMEMBRANCE DAY ACTIVITIES ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 11, 2011 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICY, THE POLICY OF INSURANCE HAS BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICY. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ADDITIONAL INSURED TYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS ❑ GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $5,000,000 M COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY $5,000,000 DOCCURRENCE ❑CLAIMS MADE PRODUCTS -COMPLETED OPERATIONS AGGREGATE $5,000,000 ❑ GENERAL AGGREGATE $5,000,000 MEDICAL EXPENSE (ANY ONE PERSON) $25,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER. a POLICY ❑ PROJECT ❑ LOCATION TENANT'S LEGAL LIABILITY (EACH PREMISES) $250,000 0 NON -OWNED AUTO NON -OWNED AUTO $1,000,000 EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY ❑ BODILY INJURY EACH PERSON EACH ACCIDENT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (EACH ACCIDENT) ❑ ALL OWNED AUTOS ❑ SCHEDULED AUTOS ❑ HIRED AUTOS ❑ NON -OWNED AUTOS LEASED AUTOS ❑ Ej GARAGE LIABILITY ❑ ANY AUTO AUTO —EACH ACCIDENT EACH ACCIDENT ❑ ❑ EXCESSIUMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE ❑ OCCURRENCE ❑ CLAIMS MADE ...•...... AGGREGATE --••-•-•••- ❑ OTHER CROSS LIABILITY CLAUSE ............... DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES I EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, CITY OF PITT MEADOWS, SCHOOL DISTRICT 42 AND MAPLE RIDGE PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES COMMISSION ARE ADDITIONAL INSUREDS AS THEIR INTEREST MAY APPEAR BUT ONLY WITH RESPECT TO THEIR VICARIOUS LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE NAMED INSUREDS OPERATIONS DESCRIBED ABOVE. CANCELLATION SHOULD THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICY BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE, THE INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 1 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE TIFICATE HOLDER NAMED ABOVE, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KINQ UPON TH INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED-.R8 PRESENTATIVE - f Cerrifrca­/ Lrability-English-la-ZOtd QL,11) Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: October 17, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer Disbursements for the month ended September 30, 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council has authorized all voucher payments to be approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor and a Finance Manager. Council authorizes the vouchers for the following period through Council resolution. The disbursement summary for the past period is attached for information. Expenditure details are available by request through the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION: That the "disbursements as listed below for the month ended September 30, 2011 now be approved". GENERAL $ 9,237,842 PAYROLL $ 1,556,342 PURCHASE CARD $ 104.864 48 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan. b) Community Communications: The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial disbursements. 1131 c) Business Plan / Financial Implications: Hi hif hts of lar er items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution • Double M Excavating Ltd. - 232 Street drainage improvements $ 733,660 • Fraser Valley Regional Library - 3rd quarter member assessment $ 593,871 • Microserve - mobile computers, phone systems & plotter $ 156,220 • Patricia A. Watson, Notary - Land acquisition $ 380,439 • Precise Crossing Ltd. - Sanitary sewer extension to Corrections $ 525,016 • Receiver General - RCMP contract Apr-Jun/11 $ 2,892,177 • RG Arenas - Ice rentals June, July & August $ 170,228 d) Policy Implications: Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice. CONCLUSIONS: The disbursements for the month ended September 30, 2011 have been reviewed and are in order. Prepared by: G'Ann Rygg Accounting Clerk II Approved by: Tr hompson, CGA Manager of Financial Planning Approved by: P0 Gill, bBA, CGA GM - orate inanciat ices Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) ule Chief Ad inistrative Officer gmr CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - SEPTEMBER 2011 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION QF PAYMENT 0871933 BC Ltd Security refund 775983 BC Ltd Roadside mowing AT & H Industries Inc Gravel & dump fees Alpi Construction Inc. Security refund BC Hydro Electricity Sept BC SPCA Contract Sept Community Animal Centre development - 50% share Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd Maintenance: LED lights Pole installation @ 203rd & 119th Pole installation @ 203rd & Stewart Replace damaged signal pole Replace stolen wire @ Hammond Road Server outlets @ Fire Hall #1 Street lights CUPE Local 622 Dues - pay periods 11/18 & 11/19 Canadian Lawn Care Services 224th Street loading/unloading area Chevron Canada Ltd Fuel Oct Columbia Bitulithic Ltd Duraphalt Co -Pilot Industries Gravel & dump fees Corix Water Products Waterworks supplies DMS Enterprises Refund building permit Directional Mining & Drilling Kanaka Creek watermain @ Lougheed Hwy Abernathy Way storm pipe Double M Excavating Ltd 232 Street Drainage Improvements Fitness Edge Fitness classes & programs Fleetmatics USA, LLC Vehicle tracking units Fraser Valley Regional Library 3rd quarter member assessment Geo Media Engineering Ltd Albion dyke review Golder & Associates Albion dyke seismic assessment River Road drainage improvement 248 Street slope movement investigation Greater Vanc Water District Barnston/Maple Ridge pump station Guillevin International Inc Fire fighters' equipment Fire fighters' protective wear Operations electrical supplies SCBA equipment upgrade Imperial Paving 2011 annual pavement rehabilitation program Roadworks Interprovincial Traffic Sery Railway safety Upgrade conflict monitors Jacks Automotive & Welding Fire Dept equipment repairs Manulife Financial Employee benefits premiums Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council Art Centre grant Sep Arts program subsidy for marketing Program revenue Aug Theatre rental Medical Services Plan Employee medical & health premiums Metro Motors Ltd 2011 Ford F25 Supercab 4X2 Microserve Mobile computer replacement Phone systems Plotter replacement Municipal Pension Plan BC Employee benefits premiums Newlands Lawn & Garden Mainten Grass cutting 26,153 39,436 141 2,175 2,922 2,731 5,725 1,330 3,881 31,368 18,312 7,134 8,432 1,186 2,107 213 798 13,499 65,045 14,530 30,258 9,363 46,392 1,400 16,471 318 124,619 4,209 27,392 AMOUNT 117,390 17,987 33,389 26,000 38,093 65,589 18,905 34,758 119,002 87,246 66,589 35,873 16,676 24,094 49,680 733,660 19,461 22,015 593,871 16,957 16,752 96,257 16,61.7 79,575 39,621 15,565 129,307 64,582 31,084 41,897 156,220 349,878 18,066 Now Solutions Payroll software annual license Ocean Pipe T6045 Worksyard pipe Patricia A Watson, Notary Land acquisition Pedre Contractors Ltd 230 Street storm sewer replacement Precise Crossings Ltd Sanitary sewer extension to Correction Centre Raincity Janitorial Sery Ltd Janitorial services: Firehalls Library Municipal Hall Operations Randy Herman Building RCMP Receiver General For Canada Employer/Employee remit PP11/18 & PP11/19 RCMP contract Apr-Jun/11 RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ice rental June, July & August Ridge Meadows Recycling Society Monthly contract for recycling Sept Weekly recycling Litter pick-up contract Royal Lepage Brookside Realty Land acquisition deposit Scottish Line Painting Ltd Road painting Tikal Construction Ltd. Leisure Centre change rooms re -tile Tundra Plumbing Ltd Plumbing: Albion Fairgrounds Cottonwood BMX Osprey Park Pitt Meadows Family Rec. Centre Thomas Haney Skate Park Whonnock Lake Valley Landscaping Ltd Websters Corners Park Valley Traffic Systems Inc Traffic control Warrington PCI Management Advance for Tower common costs Sept Tower expenses Aug Winvan Paving Ltd 122 Avenue bike lane Young, Anderson - Barristers Professional fees August Disbursements In Excess $15,000 Disbursements Under $15,000 Total Payee Disbursements Payroll PP11/18 & PP11/19 Purchase Cards - Payment Total Disbursements September 2011 GMR \\DOVE\CorpServ\Finance\Accounting\Accounts Payable\AP Disbursements\2011\[Monthly_Council_Report_2011.xlsx]SEP'11 6,443 5,230 2,907 2,926 4,503 3,223 573,204 2,892,177 92,000 383 1,848 7,875 622 1,208 487 4,917 ??1 60,000 5,848 51,134 16,649 380,439 41,933 525,016 25,232 3,465,381 170,228 94,231 20,000 75,413 96,370 15,330 20,071 25,747 65,848 71,713 38,716 8,392,107 845,735 9,237,842 1,556,342 104,864 10,899,048