Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-06-17 Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA June 17, 2013 1:00 p.m. Council Chamber Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more information or clarification before proceeding to Council. Note: If required, there will be a 15 -minute break at 3:00 p.m. Chair: Acting Mayor 1. DELEGAT/ONS/STAFFPRESENTAT/ONS- (10 minutes each) 1:00 p.m. 1.1 British Columbia Ambulance Service Presentation - Lisa Crowder, District Manager Metro East, Superintendent - Robert Wand, Critical Care Paramedic - Derek Mclure, Unit Chief, Superintendent Dispatch Operations - Tim Philley, Director of Operations 2. PUBL/C WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERV/CES Note: Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications may be permitted to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes. Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda: 1101 2013-029-RZ, 22305 and 22315 122 Avenue, RS -1 to RM -2 Staff report dated June 17, 2013 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6987-2013 to rezone from RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit construction of a four storey 59 unit apartment building be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C and D of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. Committee of the Whole Agenda June 17, 2013 Page 2 of 5 1102 2012-054-RZ, 23274 Silver Valley Road, RS -3 to RS -1b and RS -1 Staff report dated June 17, 2013 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7001-2013 to re -designate land use, shift the conservation boundary and relocate open space area be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6936-2012 to rezone from RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS -1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) and RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) to permit a future subdivision of six lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1103 2011-054-DVP-DP, 22327 and 22315 River Road Staff report dated June17, 2013 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2011-054-DVP to vary building setbacks and further that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2011 -054 -DP to regulate the form and character of a proposed 43 unit, four -storey apartment building. 1104 2013-027-DVP, 10412, 10450 and 10500 Jackson Road Staff report dated June 17, 2013 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2013-027-DVP to increase retaining wall height and reduce road servicing requirements within the 104 Avenue and 248 Street right-of-ways to permit a subdivision of approximately 128 lots. 1105 2013 -039 -AL, 20208 Mclvor Avenue, Application to Exclude Land from the Agricultural Land Reserve Staff report dated June 17, 2013 providing resolutions for consideration and recommending that Application 2013 -039 -AL to exclude 1.865 hectares of land from the Agricultural Land Reserve be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission. 1106 British Columbia Lottery Corporation Request Staff report dated June 17, 2013 recommending that the number of slot machines permitted at the Community Gaming Centre located at 22692 Lougheed Highway be increased to a maximum of 200. Committee of the Whole Agenda June 17, 2013 Page 3 of 5 1107 Proposed Minor Amendments to Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises Bylaw Staff report dated June 17, 2013 recommending that Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises Bylaw No. 6982-2013 be given first, second and third readings. 1108 Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Staff report dated June 17, 2013 providing information on the regulatory framework and water quality monitoring data for 2012. 1109 Award of Contract ITT-EN13-36: 122 Avenue Road and Drainage Improvements (221 Street to 222 Street) Staff report dated June 17, 2013 recommending that Contract ITT-EN13-36: 122 Avenue Road and Drainage Improvements (221 Street to 222 Street) be awarded to Imperial Paving Ltd., that the Financial Plan be amended and further that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 1110 Award of Contract ITT-EN13-40: Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path (Laity Street to 216 Street) Staff report dated June 17, 2013 recommending that Contract ITT-EN13-40: Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path (Laity Street to 216 Street) be awarded to Mission Contractors Ltd., that provisional work be approved subject to securing grant funding from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure ("MOTI") and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 3. FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERV/CES (including Fire and Police) 1131 Disbursements for the month ended May 31, 2013 Staff report dated June 17, 2013 recommending that the disbursements for the month ended May 31, 2013 be approved. 1132 2013 Residential Class Property Taxation Staff report dated June 17, 2013 providing information on municipal taxes assessed to Class 1 -Residential. 1133 2012 Annual Report and 2012 Statement of Financial Information Staff report dated June 17, 2013 recommending that the 2012 Annual Report be received and that the 2012 Statement of Financial Information be approved. Committee of the Whole Agenda June 17, 2013 Page 4 of 5 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERV/CES 1151 Albion Sports Complex Water Tender Award Staff report dated June 17, 2013 recommending that Contract No. PL13-35 for the construction of the Albion Sports Complex Water Play Park be awarded to TGK Irrigation Ltd. for $300,470.00 plus GST and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 5. CORRESPONDENCE 1171 6. OTHER ISSUES 1181 7. ADJOURNMENT Committee of the Whole Agenda June 17, 2013 Page 5 of 5 8. COMMUNITY FORUM COMMUNITY FORUM The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the individual members of Council. The total time for this Forum is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a response will be given. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings and delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca Checked by: Date: 1AMLE RIDGE 9n[i.h eosY«es u^rn .10.)12 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 17, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2013-029-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6987-2013 22305 and 22315 122 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject properties from RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential). Staff were directed to prepare a zone amending bylaw for first reading consideration at the May 28, 2013 Council meeting. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6987-2013 be given first reading; and; That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C and D of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owners: Bissky Architecture and Urban Design Danik and Blossom Daniels Legal Description: Lots: A and: B, D.L.: 399, NWD Plan: NWP13442 OCP: Zoning: Existing: Low -Rise Apartment Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: South: RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Use: Multi -Family Residential Zone: RM -5 (Low Density Apartment Residential) Designation: Ground Oriented Multi -Family, Conservation Use: Single -Family Residential Zone: RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Ground Oriented Multi -Family 1101 East: West: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Single -Family Residential RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) Low Rise Apartment, Conservation Single -Family Residential RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) Low Rise Apartment Single -Family Residential Multi -Family Residential 0.326 hectares (0.8 acres) 122 and 123 Avenues Urban Standard The subject site consists of two properties, characterised by a flat topography and forested in the northern portion of the site. The site fronts 122 Avenue at the south end and 123 Avenue at the north end, and is designated Low -Rise Apartment in the Official Community Plan. A boarded and unoccupied single-family house accessed from 122 Avenue is located on each property. There is currently no sidewalk along either frontage of 122 or 123 Avenues. The properties have relatively narrow frontages (20 metres each) with significantly longer lot depths (approximately 80 metres). The overall site is smaller than one acre. c) Project Description: The applicant proposes to rezone both properties to permit future construction of a four storey 59 unit apartment building. The development site is located within the North View Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan. The subject site is also located in Sub Area 2 of the Town Centre Area Incentive Program, but does not meet the conditions to be included in the program because it is four storeys, whereas five storeys are required. d) Background: This development application was the subject of a staff report dated May 6, 2013, which included a number of policy concerns, particularly the lot consolidation policy and the impact to future development potential for properties located at 22295 and 22333 122 Avenue to the west and east of the subject site, respectively. At the May 14, 2013 Council meeting, Council passed a motion to defer the application for two weeks to allow the applicant to discuss development alternatives with the property owner of 22295 and 22333 122 Avenue that would address the policy concerns outlined in the staff report. At the May 27, 2013 Committee of the Whole meeting, both the applicant and adjacent property owner appeared as delegations to outline the results of their discussions. During the May 28, 2013 Council meeting, the application was brought forward and the staff recommendation was defeated. Council further resolved the following: "That staff be directed to bring forward a zone amending bylaw for first reading and identify the additional information the applicant is required to provide in accordance with Development Procedures Bylaw 5879-1999." -2- It was noted that it was possible for the applicant and adjacent property owner to arrive at an agreement, noting that the zone amending bylaw could be amended after first reading. Subsequent to consideration of the May 6, 2013 staff report, the applicant has been in contact with the property owner of both 22295 and 22333 122 Avenue. While the property owner has expressed an interest in developing their properties and has been in contact with the applicant to discuss various development proposals, no agreement has been finalized to date. We understand that discussions are still taking place between the two parties and it is still possible for them to come to an agreement to create two separate but consolidated sites. This process would require a subdivision application for three of the four properties to create development parcels. If this occurs, Council could easily amend the first reading bylaw and give second reading to the amended bylaw at the same time to reflect such an agreement. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. e) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is located in the North View Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan. The site is currently designated Low -Rise Apartment, which permits an apartment form with residential parking provided underground. The Town Centre Area Plan Policy 3-22 regarding the Low -Rise Apartment designation is as follows: All Low -Rise Apartment developments should be a minimum of three (3) storeys and a maximum of five (5) storeys in height. The proposed development complies with the form envisioned in the Town Centre Area Plan. A previous staff report dated May 6, 2013 provided a detailed assessment of applicable OCP policies, including the following: • Policy 3-10 Lot Consolidation • Policy 3-15 Underground Parking • Policy 5.2.1 Connective Pedestrian Network Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 22305 and 22315 122 Avenue from RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit future construction of a four storey, 59 unit apartment building. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.11 of the Official Community Plan, a Town Centre Development Permit application is required for all multi -family residential, flexible mixed use and commercial development located in the Town Centre. -3- Advisory Design Panel: A Town Centre Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading, the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. f) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Building Department; c) Operations Department; d) Fire Department; and e) Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and departments not listed above. The Engineering Department has estimated in a preliminary assessment that a minimum of eight metres of road dedication would be required from all four properties along 123 Avenue. At this time, a full evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. This evaluation will take place between first and second reading. As outlined in the May 6, 2013 report, Council may seek to require that the Developer provide the road improvement services for the neighbouring properties (22295 and 22333 122 Avenue) to improve the viability of developing the neighbouring properties. This would also resolve concerns with pedestrian connectivity in the immediate area. g) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); and 2. A Town Centre Development Permit Application (Schedule D). The above list is intended to be indicative only; other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. -4- CONCLUSION: Pursuant with Council direction, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6987-2013 has been prepared, and it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. "Original signed by Amelia Bowden" Prepared by: Amelia Bowden Planning Technician "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6987-2013 Appendix C - Proposed Site Plan -5- APPENDIX A `v v ) 2301 10 12306 NWS 3018 11 12294 LMS 608 Park BCP 30288 BCS 32 2295 *PP119 12 N 2 Ic 2275 O 13 a 12286 1 012 22 55 14 122 58 N N LMP 5061-i JSubjectProperties 123 AVE. LMP A 15241 B 13 co co P 13442 A B BCS 53 P51690 r) n V LMS 1802 N N di - rn N N o M N M N co LMS •721 N N CD N 01 N N 0 VI N 3 N N P 16132 N A LMf H I 44 48 12167 Rea P 41066 P 44211 M 2 12170 7r in co 12159 M a a 1 12154 L P 18496 4 ' 12149 A n 9A Lo\,. N Scale: 1:1,500 Ci .f Pitt Meaows __ *+' "�► 22305/15-122 Ave � ! 0 ... _�� y.�y. � 13 M � I to EL CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT O F AriloozTVIN lk°; - �� o rt };,;'"`� � p f, v �,,-+ _ '� y MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 District of " _JI Langley -a, — �' =m' l'=--" DATE: Apr3, 2013 2013-029-RZ BY: JV Jr ASER� APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6987-2013 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6987-2013." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot A District Lot 399 New Westminster District Plan 13442 Lot B District Lot 399 New Westminster District Plan 13442 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1587 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER "cg I — — — 0_1 I g1 1 I III \ 1, P8914 S 1/2 C 12333 1- NWS 24 I ~ 123307 m I — — --1 i` / N 12334 _ _ BCP 48431 21 HILLSIDE 8— 12320 1- — - I \ Rem 1 / 42 12325 N 12319 cV co 20 112313 12312 1 1 1 LMP 4403 1 P 80319 // P 41225 43 12305 12297 DAR a 192301 123060 1 1T NWS 301i�3\ NWS 2 12320 1 P 1112 11 LMS 608 I 2 \ Park BCP 30288 BCS 3276 12296 10 BCP48429 40 12294 1-i ) _ — — _ 1— 12283 2 BCP 473430 12295 I *PP119 - - - — co 12 N BCHPA RW 183T4 2 12268 _ _1I_— *PP11T9 — ", — — — —� -o 1:1-41 1 M I 1_ P 28405 12275 13 12286 a 0 I _ — — — RE 12310 P15 16012 LMP 50618 LMP 50617 BCP 14 N N J 12275 BCS 12258 12255 12258 — — - — — — W N 123 AVE. — — — - in P 8813 w 22295 224 ST. I a 222 ST. 12238 56 LMP 22261 22230 0 0 22229 P 2 588 22255 r LMP 15242 I P 13442 `c" 00' BCS 3724 It241 A B 53 M M 12230 W I d 2 2 2 J J 57 I B P 51690 12241 1 LMS 1802 12238/12248 58 M I C 12207 N N N Lr, M N M N LMS �i721 go' I N LMS 873 EP 70164 RW 81544 12206 122 AVE. m NWS 612 N m N o 3 cO N N N P M 16132 N 12191 LMS 32$ 1A LMP 26249 JLEft 01614 LMP 26402 N H 1 LMP 26401 12184-90 51 44 48 12167 Rem 3 - — — — P 49482 P 41066 P 44211 M 2 12170 12175 V op 12150 (REC CEt d 12159 M lL o 51/73 12170 1 12154L P 18496 4 SRW 45029 12157 v N LMS 401 12148(ECRA) 12147 275 I 12149 14 12 EP 72617 —, 28 - cc N LMP 37897 _1 '- LMP 12139 1 12142 P 15022 �, 12150 '?- N _ RW 78 AP 24838 \ E !48N36 I 0 co N N Vicn LMP 83 P 60276 = _ _ _ _ 274easr — — - — 12129 1 Rem 1531 11 M 23 �/ / \ 29 273 11C.1G P 10689 _co_ 12130 d \ 12135 \ NWS 12123 272 (P 669) 10_ _1 1 x12127 16 10 12124 1221N 12130 12128 1 1 12119 12128 I 12117 12121 o "'I�I2 N MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6987-2013 Map No. 1587 From: RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: RM -2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) L\, N SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia Massing Concept for 6 to 8 unit Apartment or Townhouse Building on 22333- 122nd Avenue Proposed 59 unit -- Apartment Building on 22585 & 22315 -122nd Avenue Massing Concept for — Apartment Building on 22295 -122nd Avenue rrenrnmary vrny Representing Lend Use for subnlulon for Rezoning under Bylaw No. 6471-2007 APPENDIX C PROPOSED Multi Fr Ravine/Environmental Dedication Area Doe. s 2613 Proposed 59 Unit Apartment Building Aerial Perspective Sketch Looking South -Wes} .0 Iwo WI M Mna °-1 Y — AO( D m z 0 x c) District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 17, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-054-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: First and Second Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7001-2013 and Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6936-2012 23274 Silver Valley Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS -1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) and RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) to permit a future subdivision of six lots. This application requires an amendment to the Official Community Plan to re -designate the land use to Low/Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential, to shift the Conservation boundary, and to relocate the Open Space area. This application received first reading for Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6936-2012 on June 26, 2012. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7001-2013 be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7001-2013 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw; 3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7001-2013 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7001- 2013 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 5. That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6936-2012 be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and, 1102 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Amendments to Part VI, Figure 2 (Land Use Plan), 3A (Blaney Hamlet) and Figure 4 (Trails / Open Space) of the Silver Valley Area Plan of the Official Community Plan; iii. Road dedication as required; iv. Park dedication as required, including construction of walkways and equestrian trail; v. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; vi. Registration of a Statutory Right -of -Way plan and agreement at the Land Title Office for utilities; vii. Removal of the existing building; and viii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Damax Consultants Ltd. 0752504 B C Ltd. Legal Description: Lot 3, Section 33, Township 12, NWD Plan 20132 OCP: Existing: Proposed: Medium Density Residential, Low/Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential, Open Space and Conservation. Low/Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential, Open Space and Conservation Zoning: Existing: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS -lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) -2- Surrounding Uses: North: South: East: West: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Project Description: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Single Family Residential, Pedestrian Walkway RS -1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) Low/Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential and Conservation Single Family Residential RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential and Conservation Conservation (North Alouette River) RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) Conservation Single Family Residential RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) Medium Density Residential and Low/Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 0.936 HA. (2.3 acres) Silver Valley Road and Blaney Road Full Urban Standard The subject development involves rezoning and subdivision of the site to allow for six single family lots. Three lots will front onto and will be accessed via Silver Valley Road. The remaining three lots will be accessed via an extension of Blaney Road, currently accessed via a temporary access road in statutory right-of-way over two existing single family lots. Once Blaney Road permanently connects with Silver Valley Road or 232 Street, the statutory right-of-way located on two single family lots to provide temporary access to Blaney Road will be eliminated, allowing homes to be constructed. This is anticipated to take place once lands further south develop. The eastern third of the subject site is characterized by steep slopes and the North Alouette River. This portion of land will be dedicated for conservation purposes through the rezoning process. Larger RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) lots will back on to the conservation area and transition to smaller RS -1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) lots further to the west. An equestrian trail is proposed in the conservation area that will connect with existing trails to the north. -3- c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is within the Blaney Hamlet of the Silver Valley Area Plan which forms part of the Official Community Plan. The subject property has multiple land -use designations: Conservation, Low Density Urban, Low/Medium Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Open Space. The applicant has requested an OCP amendment to the existing land use designations. The details of the amendments are: an increase to the conservation land on the eastern portion of the site to align with the developable land boundary; a change from Low Density Urban, Low/Medium Density Residential and Medium Density Residential to Low/Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential to allow for the future subdivision of five RS -lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) lots and one RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) lot; a shifting of the Conservation boundary to align with the developable area boundary, and a relocation of the Open Space designation further west to add to the pedestrian connection between Silver Valley Road and Blaney Road. An amendment to Figure 4 (Trails/Open Space) is also required to reflect the proposed equestrian trail location and additional Conservation area. Zoning Bylaw: The applicant proposes to rezone the subject site to RS -1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) and RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) to allow for future subdivision into six lots. The proposed lots meet the minimum lot requirements, however a height and front yard setback relaxation has been requested by the applicant. Proposed Variances: The applicant has requested a relaxation on the height of the proposed RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) zoned lots from 9.5 to 11 metres; and for a relaxation on the front yard setback for the RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) zoned lots from 7.5 to 6 metres. The purpose of the requested variances is to bring the front yard siting and building height for the two zones in line with one another. The maximum height in the RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone is 11 metres, and the front yard setback for the RS -lb (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) is 6 metres, therefore applicable variances for these lots has not been requested. The requested variances will be the subject of a future report to Council. Development Permits: A Watercourse Protection and Natural Features Development Permit is required for the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment of the North Alouette River and the steep slopes on the site. The details are discussed in the Environmental Implications section below. A Security will be taken as a condition of the issuance of the Development Permit to ensure that the Development Permit Area guidelines are met. d) Environmental Implications: The applicant has submitted an Arborist report prepared by Michael J. Mills Consulting, a Geotechnical report prepared by Braun Geotechnical Ltd and an Environmental Assessment report -4- prepared by AquaTerra Environmental Ltd in support of the Watercourse Protection and Natural Features Development Permit. The North Alouette River is located within a ravine with a width greater than 60 metres. As a result, the riparian setback requirement is 10 metres. The Geotechnical Engineer has determined a Geotechnical Setback Line of 15 metres from the ravine top of bank. The greater amount of 15 metres has been used to determine the rear property line to ensure that the lots are geotechnically stable and not environmentally sensitive. Michael J. Mills Consulting has concluded that some tree retention along the pedestrian walkway and in some of the rear yards will be feasible. e) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed development and has advised that not all required services exist. Therefore, a Rezoning Servicing Agreement will be required prior to final reading. Parks & Leisure Services Department: An equestrian trail will be provided within the conservation land to connect with existing trail north of the development site. The cost of construction will be included in the Rezoning Servicing Agreement. The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional six trees which is based on one tree per lot. The final subdivision design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $150.00. f) School District Comments: The application was referred to the School District but no comments have been received to date. g) Intergovernmental Issues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. -5- CONCLUSION: It is recommended that first and second reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7001-2013, that second reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6936-2012 and that application 2012-054-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. "Original signed by Amelia Bowden" Prepared by: Amelia Bowden Planning Technician "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7001- 2013 Appendix C - Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6936-2012 Appendix D - Subdivision Plan -6- APPENDIX A 3880 1 PARK I I � BCP 46698 1 P 13776 2 13860 1 /1 I 3 3co S 13856 4 a v BCP 46658 13852 00 03 p Q' 5 ' 13887 13848 ,3868 t II — ,4 PARK 213gss 3gsz iI P4 I 5 21%� EP 424 3 13841 / 2 13831 aft 20 Rem ro� 13825 13828 1 BCS 3588 4 1390 13771 13902 19 13811 / / 1 1 10 5 8 3812 13>g3 13>gs 11 18 13785 / 17 137 // /l13g0z24 13783 3>8 12 NBCP 42823 91 law3782 16 13762 3 4 8 �' 1 a PARK 13700 / U 3j>s 13 m 15CO X31 / 13»2 a 3762 12 14 S'/ j5 SUBJECT PROPERTY 13782 13��/, 13752 6 378o // . �' 73783 15 RD SILVER VALLEY / ( N. N N 3 P 20132 Rem 1 2 P 20 32 13738 P 20132 4 `151 P 2409 / 8 *PP162 I 13702 _. 3653 N 200' 9 f.' 3660 , rn 0 v I a RP 10274 S PART 9 I 13616 / N 1:2,500 Clt',.f Mea Pitt owsI P4,•-44 _ 4611101 I I . -,06 } f I c I•g 23274 SILVER VALLEY ROAD - �'" y �f i,, CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF i!t'g A '' I _r ,I°,o MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT District of �' ^�°,, �� . Langley Mk o May 8, 2012 FILE: 2012-054-RZ BY: PC `SCALE •' FBAs ��DATE: ER R. \\ APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 7001-2013 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Section 10.3 Part VI Silver Valley Area Plan Figures 2, 3A and 4 of the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7001-2013." 2. Figures 2 and 3A are hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 20132 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 853, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby redesignated as shown. 3. Figure 4 is hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 20132 and shown in heavy black line on Map No. 854, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, to add to Horse Trail and Conservation. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , 20 . PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , 20 . READ A SECOND TIME the day of , 20 . READ A THIRD TIME the day of , 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER N 3 cy,a 8�� `�41M W 13867 18870 F�p 2 18 (0 rn 4 X23 �o a by 7- 13863 13868 13 N 9 73869 l' 6/ Q .N - J m cu — 7/ / 013859 73g66 12 Li,/ 20 13861 L cu 1 :S 3588 �� \ - / Q/ 3 4 805 13771 - - - 238 55 13837 1- U) / v 13868 62 5 22 73g 73857 EP 4248 2 13g42 6 N 21 13841 z..-/ M 20 uRem Pc! B ®/R20/3825 /� 73825 13828 1380 m 19 138 0 10 I BCP 42874 2 8 / 11 ® 13793 7379611 9 1813795 0..;- 137920 c0 13782 17 137 m 13802 Zco ^ 197g3•13js2 12 N BCP 42823 10 81 = o 13772 1 / 16 137 13782 3U /Q 8 731.? 13 j PARK BCP 33246 65 013773 mss\ m 7 15 BCP 332 8 7� 13772 4 / @Cp 13762 12 14 �6> / 7 — 428 ,_s a 13j53 N N 13762-C . 13762 14 13752 13 / 2 6 9 350 B ' e 2875 / 13753 15 tom\ • Ln V IN N 4 . fr • IN=MILIrr Rem 1 2 P 2 132 P 20132 4 P 2409 8 *PP162 N200'9 rn 0 ,1- ( \I (L /P 10274 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 7001-2013 Map No. 853 Purpose: To Amend Figures 2 and 3A as shown below :.:.;27 Low/Medium Density Residential 0 Open Space ■■■■■! Low Density Residential %% Conservation L\ N SCALE 1:2,500 All MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia N 3 a 8�� `�� M W 73867 13870 F�p 2 18 (0 (0 4 4323 �o a by 17- 13863 13g68 13 N 9 13869 tr J m— it 41 7/1L 13859 13866 12 Li,/ 20 73861 1 :S 3588 \\ \ — ^ / e Q/ 3 4 805 13771 - — — 2 36' 55 13837 to / v 13868 73862 5 22 73857 �Q EP 4248 iZe 13g42 6 N 21 13841 J[v 2 20 u� Rem Pc! B 13825 13828 ® )/R20/3825 /c) 13802m 19 138 0 10 I BCP 42874 8 / 11 ® 13793 7379611 73792 9 1813795 Q0 co 13782 17 137 m 136'02 Zco N 1ko 97g3 13js2 12 N BCP 42823 10 81 = o 13772 1 / 16 137 13782 3U /Q g v 73j> 13 V PARK BCP 33246 65 O 13773 �6 m 7 15 BCP 332 8 7� 13772 4 / @Cp 13762 12 14 �6> / 7 4287 ,-s 13j63 N N 13762 @C 13762 14 13752 13 / 2 6 8 13750 / / 13753 15 ______B42875 in EC, N 3 EN N M N N N P 20132 Rem 1 2 P 2 132 P 20132 4 P 2409 8 *PP162 N200'9 rn 0 v (V 0 /P 10274 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 7001-2013 Map No. 854 Purpose: To Amend Figure 4 as shown below 0 Add Conservation — — Add Trail L\ N SCALE 1:2,500 All MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia APPENDIX C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6936-2012 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6936-2012." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 20132 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1573 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS -1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) and RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 26th day of June, A.D. 2012. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Nil 13860 2 / / 1 859 3 U)I m 4°c°1 / 3 13856 ""I § rn / 855 4 a a a m/ BCP 46658 851 13852 mm � U / / BCP 46660 O 5 I m / / 13887 W 13848 /1 ,9 13868 22 PARK 2 13962 13857 5 oi/ 21 m 1 it �. 13855 / _� EP 4248 — — I M 313841 2 • 13831 . 1•!20 l Rem Pcl B I N 13825 13828 13 11;614 1350 3795 I II� 1 BI s 3588 I \ \ \ 13771 — — — 5 N 1 /NV 19 ` BCP 42874 3go2 13811 O 1 10 $ / 18 7 13812 / 13793 13796 11 ® 13795 Q 1, 17 m 13802 2 �`o co 19 137 12 BCP 42823 13782 10 13781 3 l 3783 82 7 13772 11 13765 / 16 13782 2 / 8 137 PARK BCP 33246 m U 13773 Q 7\ 13 m BCP 33248 15 4 m 35 13772 / 7 ... 2 13762 12 14 5 1 3793 13762 14-, �y. 13762 ac. ; 13752 13 / 2829 13780 BC42875 / 13753 15 SILVER VALLEY RD 3 20 3 CC Rem 1 2 P 20132 4 P 20 32 13738 P 2409 8 13673/91 *PP162 13702 N 200' 9 13653 13660 0) 0 34 N 0- A RP 10274 0 VADLI Bylaw No. Mau No. From: R 6936-2012 1573 RS DG- /0\= AV -3 (One Family Rural =\D Residential) \G To: VA RS -1 b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Q RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential) /0„:\ N SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia PROPOSED 6 LOT SUBDIVISION APPENDIX D SCALE 1 500 0 25 50 m (ice SHEET SIZE: 17" X 22" DATE MAY 22, 2013 Terra Pacific Land Surveying Ltd 22371 St. Anne Avenue, Maple Ridge, BC Tel: 604-463-2509 File: R1 —650 Proposed Sub 6 MAPLE RIDGE 9n[i.I eosY«es u^rn .10.)12 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 17, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011 -054 -DP & DVP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Development Permit and Development Variance Permit 22327 and 22315 River Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Development Permit and Development Variance Permit applications have been received for the above mentioned properties to regulate the form and character of the proposed apartment building. The subject site (Appendix A) consists of two parcels and a sliver of land that was owned by the District and has now been acquired by the developer. The proposal is to rezone the subject properties from RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential zone) to CRM (Commercial/Residential zone) to allow future construction of a four -storey apartment building with 43 units. This project meets the requirements for inclusion in the Town Centre Incentives (TCI) Program (Sub Area 1) under the "4 storeys and higher" category and is subject to compliance with the Town Centre Development Permit Guidelines and Policies. Council considered rezoning application 2011-054-RZ and granted first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6827 - 2011 on June 14, 2011. Council granted second reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6827 - 2011 on June 26, 2012. This application was presented at Public Hearing on July 17, 2012, and Council granted third reading on July 24, 2012. Council will be considering final reading for rezoning application 2011-054-RZ on June 25, 2013, along with this report. This report will address the requirements of Section 10.4 of the Official Community Plan for the Town Centre Development Permit Guidelines. The Development Permit application is to regulate the form and character of the proposed apartment building and the Development Variance Permit application is to vary building setbacks as described in this report. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2011-054-DVP respecting properties located at 22327 and 22315 River Road; and further That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2011 -054 -DP respecting property located at 22327 and 22315 River Road. 1103 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: South: East: West: Fred Formosa of Falcon Homes Ltd. Falcon Homes Ltd. Lot: A, D.L.: 398, Block: 1, Plan: 155; PID: 011-537-604 Lot: 6, D.L.: 398, Block: 1, Plan: 155; PID: 011-537-060 Port Haney Multi -Family, Commercial and Mixed -Use RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential zone) CRM (Commercial/Residential zone) Use: Multi Family Residential and lane Zone: CRM (Commercial/Residential zone) and RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential zone) Designation: Port Haney Multi -Family, Commercial and Mixed -Use Use: Single Family Residential, Industrial and River Road Zone: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential zone), RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential zone) and M-2 (General Industrial zone Designation: Port Haney Multi -Family, Commercial and Mixed -Use Use: Heritage Commercial (The Billy Miner Pub), Commercial and Industrial Zone: H-1 (Heritage Commercial zone); C-4 (Neighbourhood Pub zone) and M-2 (General Industrial zone) Designation: Port Haney Multi -Family, Commercial and Mixed -Use Use: Single Family Residential and 223rd Street Zone: RS -1 (One Family Urban Residential zone) Designation: Low-rise Apartment Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Previous Applications: b) Project Description: Vacant Multi -Family Residential (apartments) 1622.99 m2 River Road and the lane Full Urban Standard 2011-054-RZ The subject site, 1622.99 m2 in size (Appendix A) is located on River Road, in the Port Haney and Water front precinct, at the southern edge of the Town Centre Area. It is bound by roads on three sides and located close to major landmarks such as the Billy Miner Pub on the east and the West Coast Express station on the south. Currently the site is vacant and slopes down from north to south towards River Road. -2- The proposal is strategically located to take advantage of the Fraser River views and opposite the West Coast Express train station for commuters. The subject site lies within the Fraser River Escarpment area. The proposal is for a four -storey apartment building with 43 units and underground parkade. Most of the residential parking is proposed in the underground parkade, except six spaces which are proposed in the three double car garages accessible at grade from the lane on the north. The required visitor parking stalls are proposed at grade accessible from the lane. The building will contain 43 apartments (16 one -bedroom units; 24 two-bedroom units and 3 three-bedroom units). These units range in sizes from 43.66 m2 (470 ft2) to 119.8 m2 (1290 ft2). The ones facing River Road have patios and balconies to capitalize on views. A 7.0 metre wide ramp leading to the underground parkade is proposed in the south-east corner of the site and pedestrian access to the building is through the entrance lobby facing River Road (Appendix B). Garbage and recycling room is proposed in the north-west corner, facing the lane. An indoor amenity room is proposed facing the lane, above the short-term bicycle parking area and an outdoor amenity area is proposed on the east with some planters and movable seating for the residents to use (Appendix D). c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The Town Centre area is divided into seven precincts and the subject site is located within the "Port Haney and Waterfront Precinct". Historically, Port Haney area served as the District's commercial hub, the remnants of which are heritage buildings such as Haney House, St. Andrew's Church and the Billy Miner Pub (on the east of the subject sites). Retaining the historical character and encouraging pedestrian linkage to the central business district are important for the Port Haney area. This precinct is within walking distance of the civic core area and serves as a vital walkable link to key destinations including the Fraser River waterfront and the West Coast Express train station. The proposed low-rise apartment form on subject sites, aligns with the existing designation and is subject to key Port Haney Development Permit area guidelines stated below. Port Haney Development Permit area guidelines: • Promote Port Haney and the Waterfront as an important heritage, tourism - oriented area. The Port Haney & Fraser River waterfront area is recognized as a historical area in transition. Given the history of this area, retaining the historical character and encouraging pedestrian and multi- modal linkage to the civic core are important for this area. The Billy Miner Pub on the east of the subject site is a heritage site and recognized as a water front tourist destination for visitors. During the summer months there are music concerts and other events taking place along the Fraser River Wharf. Future residents of this development will be able to enjoy these events and support local business and heritage tourism. In future, all the area along Fraser River could potentially develop into a vibrant area for the residents to enjoy. Adding residential density in this area will contribute towards revitalizing the river front. • Provide a pedestrian -oriented, mixed use commercial and residential environment. -3- This is not a mixed-use development. Most of the main floor units facing River Road have a direct access and street presence. The proposed building offers a pedestrian friendly facade along River Road. The proposal provides visual surveillance of the lane through glazing that overlooks the lane to ensure pedestrian and vehicular safety. The main entrance facing River Road is wide and features a "rock garden" in the entrance lobby. • Enhance the heritage, quality, character and vibrancy of Port Haney and the Waterfront. This proposal shows building finishes such as: Brick veneer for specific areas on facades/columns/planters; vinyl framed widows; Asphalt shingles for roofing; a combination of horizontal and vertical cementitious board and batten or shake hardie siding for the walls, stained wood trellis, wood railings with glass inserts, decorative wood brackets and soffits. Brick and wood are considered as materials that contribute towards elements with heritage value. The five sloping roof profiles mimic the historical residential character that may have existed in the past. The entry statement created by the two columns finished with brick veneer, facing River Road, fits well with the heritage theme and makes it a quality facade (Appendix C). • Capitalize on important views. All the units facing Fraser River have been designed to capitalize on views of the River and lands beyond. • Provide outdoor space. A passive common outdoor amenity area (142 sq. m. in area) with planters and seating has been proposed on the east. In addition to this, an indoor amenity room (56 sq. m in area) is proposed above the short-term bicycle storage, facing the lane (Appendix B). Private outdoor area for all the balconies and patios for various individual units adds to 675 sq. m. • Provide climate appropriate landscaping and green features. The outdoor amenity area and patio landscaping proposes native plant species. • Maintain street interconnectivity. This development is within walking distance of the civic core area and serves as a vital walkable link to key destinations including the Fraser River waterfront and the West Coast Express train station. This proposal will benefit from a future walkway and development along the wharf. 223rd Street would be the shortest pedestrian connection to the central business district. A separated sidewalk, boulevard, curb and gutter on 223rd Street, to match the proposed development on the north of the lane, will further enhance the multi -modal linkages to the civic core area of the town centre. The pedestrian underpass (tunnel) connecting to 224th Street and the civic core area is in close proximity to the subject sites. Zoning Bylaw: The proposed CRM (Commercial/Residential zone) provides for a mix of residential and commercial uses and is specifically for lands designated Commercial/Apartment in the Port Haney area. Apartment use is a permitted principle use in this zone. The proposed apartment building complies with the off-street parking, maximum height and minimum setback requirements of the zone. This zone also permits a maximum of 90% lot coverage on main and second floor and a reduced -4- maximum lot coverage of 50% above the second floors. The developer proposes to reduce maximum lot coverage on main and second floors and increase the maximum lot coverage on third and fourth floors, as described below. Variances to the Zoning Bylaw: The proposed zone requires a lesser lot coverage on floors above the second floor, to give the building a stepped/sculpted facade. The permitted maximum lot coverage on main and second floor is 90%. The permitted maximum lot coverage on third and fourth floors is 50%. The applicant is proposing to reduce the maximum lot coverage on main floor to 66% and on the second floor to71% and increasing it on the third floor from 50% to 75% and on the fourth floor from 50% to 65% as described below: Section 707 (5)(a) is varied to permit the following: i) lot coverage of 75% on the third floor; ii) lot coverage of 65% on the fourth floor; The total lot coverage permitted for the site is within what the zone permits and the intention of this variance is to eliminate a wedding cake like form and make the building facades aligned and consistent. This variance does not negatively impact any neighbours. Section 707(7)(3) requires commercial use on the ground floor for lots south of the Haney Bypass facing 223rd Street or River Road. This requirement is varied to permit a fully residential building. This variance is supported to maximize the residential density in the Town Centre Area, which aligns well with Council's vision. Maple Ridge Off -Street Parking & Loading Bylaw #4350-1990: Due to its location in the Town Centre Area and its eligibility for the Town Centre Incentive Program in Sub -Area 1, this proposal benefits from the reduced parking standards. As per Section 10 of the Maple Ridge Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw #4350-1990, a minimum of 0.9 spaces per unit are required for a bachelor apartment which increases by 0.1 space per additional bedroom. The proposal has 16 one -bedroom units; 24 two-bedroom units and 3 three-bedroom units, giving a total of 43 units. Based on the required parking standards, for a total of 43 units, this project requires 46 residential parking spaces and 5 visitor parking spaces. A total of 40 residential parking spaces are proposed in the under -ground parkade and the remaining six spaces are provided in the three 2 -car garages facing the lane (Appendix B). All the required visitor parking stalls are proposed at grade, tucked under the slab of the floor above, facing the lane (Appendix B). In addition to the required parking spaces, the developer has opted to provide seven additional tandem parking stalls in the under -ground parkade which are anticipated to serve the same unit owners. This is considered an important marketing tool for the project. The required long- term bicycle storage lockers are proposed in the under -ground parkade and the short-term bicycle parking spaces have been proposed near the visitor parking stalls, facing the lane as shown on the site plan (Appendix B). d) Advisory Design Panel: The proposal was first reviewed at the February 14, 2012 Advisory Design Panel meeting. The panel had several concerns and passed the following resolution at this meeting: -5- The proposal be re -submitted and presented at a future Advisory Design Panel meeting with the following concerns addressed; • Submit the following: a Context Plan; Streetscape Elevations; Coloured Elevations of the building, with details of the east property line building and parking; • Consider a more cohesive design and material treatment for all the elevations of the building; • Provide handicapped access to the garbage enclosure; • Provide appropriate access to the Outdoor Amenity Space; • Consider a landscape buffer along River Road; • Re -consider the suite/unit layout with bedroom that has no window; • Provide details of the long-term bicycle storage; • Provide details of the transformer location; • Coordinate the landscape and architectural drawings with the civil drawings with regard to off-site works and boulevard location; ensure all drawings are accurate & complete. • Consider Children's Play Area within the Outdoor Amenity Space; • Re-evaluate the need for enclosed balconies; • Consider additional tree planting along the lane, on both sides including reduction of parking as needed; • Confirm and show that the garbage and recycling proposed, complies with the DMR Waste Management Guidelines; • Provide direct access to the Mechanical Room; • Allocate extra space of Electrical Room to storage space; • Specify route of the second exit on the ramp going into the U/G parkade; • Review sizes of individual storages proposed in the U/G parkade; • Specify details of how the water is collected and drained, from the top deck; • Adjust the roof plan to show necessary slopes behind the towers. After the applicant addressed the above concerns, the panel reviewed the revised proposal at the April 10, 2012 Advisory Design Panel meeting. The resolution passed at this meeting was: The following concerns be addressed and digital versions of revised drawings and memo be submitted to Planning staff; and further that Planning staff forward this on to the Advisory Design Panel for information; • Updated landscape plans to show street trees in correct locations; • Consider street front entrances where possible; • Consider addition of window to Units C, C1 and D; • Provide dimensions for the smaller storage lockers; • Consider providing details at the gables of the roof; • Provide an updated rendering; • Consider locating the entry feature on the grid of the buildings; • Provide handicapped ramp details at the front entry; • Provide exterior lighting details. The revised drawings were reviewed by the panel to their satisfaction. -6- Engineering Department: The Engineering Department have reviewed the proposal and confirmed that all the deficient off-site services will be provided through the Rezoning Servicing Agreement. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the Development Permit is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements. Fire Department: The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and comments have been provided to the applicant. The applicant has ensured that all these will be addressed through the Building Permit drawings. Building Department: The Building Department has reviewed the proposal and comments have been provided to the applicant. The applicant has ensured that all these will be addressed through the Building Permit drawings to comply with the code requirements. e) Environmental Implications: An Erosion Sediment Control Plan was reviewed by the environment section. The ESC permit fees of $500.00 have been paid by the developer. The applicable ESC refundable security monies are anticipated to be paid at the Building Permit stage. f) Citizen/Customer Implications: The mail -outs to inform residents of the proposed variances were mailed 10 days prior to the anticipated Council Meeting date. Concerned residents in the neighbourhood have had the opportunity to voice their opinions. g) Financial Implications: In accordance with Council's Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of the estimated landscape cost will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on an estimated landscape cost of $38,888.45 by M2 Landscape Architecture and Arboriculture Ltd, the refundable security of $38,888.45 has been paid by the developer. The costs associated with maintaining street trees will need to be included in a subsequent operating budget. h) Alternatives: Council approved acquisition of the small sliver of District owned land facing 223rd street that has been consolidated with the subject site. -7- The developer has submitted the signed legal documents and paid all the required securities in support of the proposed development. The developer and his team of consultants anticipate a Building Permit to be approved prior to the Town Centre Incentives Program expiry date of December 30, 2013. Council approval of the Town Centre Development Permit is required prior to a Building Permit being issued. Council has the option of not approving the Development Permit and the Variance Permit. However, not approving this proposal would result in a consolidated piece of land remaining vacant or the applicant having to amend the current design. CONCLUSION: This proposal fits well with Council's vision of densification within the Town Centre Area. This proposal also qualifies for the Town Centre Incentives Program. Some variances as outlined in this report need approval. Council approval is required for the Town Centre Development Permit and the Variance Permit as presented in this report prior to a Building Permit being issued. Final Reading report on rezoning the subject site (2011-054-RZ) is anticipated to be considered by Council at the Council meeting of June 25, 2013 along with this report. It is recommended that 2011-054-DVP and 2011 -054 -DP be considered favourably and approved. "Original signed by Rasika Acharya" Prepared by: Rasika Acharya, B -Arch, M -Tech, UDC, LEED® AP, MCIP, RPP Planner "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Proposed Site Plan & under -ground parkade plan Appendix C - Proposed Building Elevations & Sections Appendix D - Proposed Landscape Plan & landscape details -8- APPENDIX A P 1 ii. 11656 T R RP 6192 P 155 5 A cz P76188 N �• P 82887 ` A co NN \ N 11 up N P 12 N N 155 13 PARK 14 N (V P 6464 2 N N 11641 11650 1 1 CALLAGHAN AVE. N M EP 5976= CALLAGHAN � AVEililiErmw. 2 Z' r. 11630 a P 59m18 / 2' of 26 o co N 23 M a 2 2 N 3 4 wa 31 N 1 00 31 \ (0 25 N A 11617 N C\IC\IRem N N N -- �.\ S 3297 116 AVE. \' on w / \ '- N.- W 24 11613 ,� P 155 co M \ �� \ \ N M N N t°j 22 u� N 8 a 00 128 N LMS 752 j 15 - 11587 0 0 a. r 11612 11580 Re , \ • m a 14 a R SUBJECT PROPERTIES Z Rem 11598 Rp 6755 11566 \ Rp ss7 N 11575 Station M Rit,FR Ro IX Rp'3,3 M 8 Mm IN RO Rem co 9 A 1 PCS q N (P 765U B "N co' P 86773 , 1 Rp2�00 cv 4 eCp 640 Rp� 335 460 °'°,° 1565.4... •� p L �• 4665 N M sic 488 N SCALE 1:2,000 Cit Mea ,.f Pitt ows - ItIlia-R� II ,' %e ; . 22327 RIVER ROAD & ROLL #31399-00004 dal i o 41 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF _°1- �' itiF I ! J_ MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT District of I o . Langley `FRas C 1 Jun 15, 2012 FILE: 2011-054-RZ BY: PC i' ��DATE: ER R. \\ APPENDIX B 29 so 6 Pon 658 - ASPHALT ACCESg94D s GAR O� % A t)4.'�•• 5 R / ritpCKE�, G. •HO - - P I� PAPRI T �'^0 SITE RECONCILIATION PROPOSED ZONE - GRIN 55055 LOT AREA NET LOT AREA - )61560 5QM. - 1,490.06 SON) U/G 5T 2ND 5RD 4TH TOTAL ALLOWA5LE LOT COVERAGE - 45 % - 90 0 - 90 % - 50 0 - 50 0 - 315 % PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE - 95 5 - - 11% - 15% - 65% -312% ALLOWABLE HBSHT - 16.0m PROPOSED HEIbHT - 16.0m REQUIRED SETBACKS PROPOSED SETBACKS REQUIRED PARKINS PROVIDED PARKINS AMENITY SPACES N0 63m }pyo lL P ASPHALT PARKING 000 16 - i n 112 i plan 58284 � Lo EXI51000 � 7� gt)ILDINO 8.97-9�3 —9.63 9.63{9.54 ���� � ''-• •. �. • •1��,I0�0� 10_ 15 'V 92 °`m( ye O9SPP aRI�.�.�w�n :. ° : w `� 520 � — _ A 9.12 _ CENIREl1NE DF 8.57 8 B� 8.39 0 _ ROAD R ROAD 31 0 \ O GB SITE PLAN SCALE : I" = 20'-0" 0 a 0h hh 14 000 050 ;h 0 �O0 0 9300 c 00 0 LSp�)______00 NORTH 92 hh h0 C80 0=v"�T1ER 0 a 0500 _ FRONT EXT. INSIDE REAR - Om - Om - Om - bm -Om -Om -Om -6m - I BEDROOM XI6®LOO= 16.0 - 2 BEDROOM X 246 L 1. 26.4 -3 BEDROOM X SO L2= 3.6 TOTAL 46 VISITOR - 43 UNITS X 01 = 4.3 (5) &RAND TOTAL: (51) - 40 U/& STALLS - 6 SARA. STALLS - 5 VISITOR STALLS AT GRADE - TOTAL 51 STALLS - COMMON OUTDOOR AMENITY AREA: 142 5014. - PRIVATE OUTDOOR AMENITY AREA 6/5 SOM. - COMMON INDOOR AMENITY AREA: 56 SOM. UNIT SUMMARY 3 A UNIT 145 50 FT 2 BEDROOM 6 B UNIT 655 50 FT 1 BEDROOM 1 G UNIT 545 50 FT 2 BEDROOM 1 G 1 UN5 1000 SO FT 2 BEDROOM 9 D UNIT 1005 SO FT 2 BEDROOM 2 E UNIT 625 SO FT 2 BEDROOM 10 F UNE 410 50 FT 1 BEDROOM 1 6 UNIT 1290 50 FT 3 BEDROOM 2 H UNE 1225 50 FT 2 BEDROOM 2 .1 UNIT 1150 50 FT 3 BEDROOM 43 TOTAL UNITS 00 0' LB CURB�CUT 1ER _RJp 9,P1 2012 RBASIED FOR DBIELORNO. K.! JAN. 31205. Rus® FOR OFV80.3. MAT MAR 04. ROI uvucnlroN 0B13OPNENT PERMIT REVISIONS CONSULTANT: N� 88 PROJECT, CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT PoVER ROAD ma. RIDGE BC. DATE Jur n. 2010 DRAWING TITLE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN JOB NO 1009 SHEET NO P-1 APPENDIX B-1 PROVIDE APPROVED HARDWARE FOR &CYCLE STORAGE IN EACH LOCKER 64.0m 5TOR. STOR. STOR. STOR. STOR. STOR TOR. STOR. STOR. STRAT. STOR. EXIT STOR 20. 0.5m 25m 24m SG 21 50 - 25m 0 i £w O4 rQ I1I 0 25m 2.5m 25m 2 MACH LOBBY zsm 25rn 25m C 25m UNDERGROUND PARKING PLAN SCALE : 1/8" = I' -O" 5345 SOFT. 25m 25m STOR. H/0 OR. 11 5TOR. 11 5TOR. STOR. U STOR. U STOR. STOR 5TOR. STOR 55T0R.55T V 0.5m V V V V V J L £ ul m -3._ 3 1 TYP. STALL DEPTAF- IV IV E V 50 V SG TYP. OFFSET 25m l 25m 25m 2.5m 2.Sm 2.5m 25 25m 25m 24m 2.4m 40 PARKING STALLS 40 STORAGE LOCKERS 92. r STOR. ELEO. ROC IIM ROAD DEDIGAT/ON NORTH EGH. ROO 25m 25rn 25rn 25m I, 25m 11 0.3m TYP. OFFSET - 2.01m rQ asm y 25rn y old C J1I 20 40. I I , EXIT 25 + 50M. STOR. PROVIDE HARDWARE FOR UPRIGHT BICYCLE STORAGE g NOTE: ALL LOCKERS INCLUDE SPACE FOR BICYCLE STORAGE SMALL LOCKER SCALE :1/4" =11-0" • FEB 27. 2012, RNSE0 FCR CRYFICIMMIT PERM1 JAN 31 20C1 MM. FOR DEM... MAT MN 1 2012, REVISED FCR DEVECIMMIT PMMIT MAR 00. 20I 1=0,Z,DEVE.OPM.11 PEWIT REVISIONS CONSULTANT: w iLL C a in PROJECT. CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT M. ROAD MAKE RIDGE B.C. DATE 2055.3010 V8"=Iro DRAWN. DRAWING 111LE PRELIMINARY UNDERGROUND PARKING PLAN JOB NO 1009 SHEET NO P-2 APPENDIX C 148.13 ROOF PEAK 25.61m 140.00 T/O FASCIA 23I4m 630.000 FOURTH FLOOR T/O GONG. TOPPING 120.00 THIRD FLOOR _ T/O GONG. TOPPING 10.00 SECOND FLOOR T/O CONC. TOPPING • 100.00 FIRST FLOOR I 1.00m T/O SUSP. SLAB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I�I�If l>I ` 11��1�11� `Imaw lg MINHIui j III Ii■SII Nal II! If IIoilllli ---- mm1i •-- ==1 m•w= `II•I•I•I•II\ t ■®Illlr•■ -Ill i llI. IUi���: MEM 11 ii1 mm= �1�� �•l� 0 0 0 121==1iW■1=1■ef■MEI �II-=IIm:iI-I; NI_ -I =.iagl==...I 1111111111 Illlullp111111111111111111 MMMM IN MIM 111111111111 111111111111111111111 11112c..................._ ................ 111111 IIIIAIIIIII 1111111111111111111111 ■f I=1■i■ _ €= I■I liill _ _'611=I_ ■ail IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII1111IIIIIIIIIIII =111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIII 11111111111111 pIIl11I111I1111I11111 e11=L1■m■L_.■■L"=-I=1■=ila---I iii PS,' 111111111111111111111111111111 -1-- -I n ■.■ 901 UNDERGROUND PARKING MUNE OF uwr, PARKNS 8.00m T/O CONCRETE SLAB AT PERIMETER BUILDING FINISHES 111111111II11IV1111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE : I/8" A - ROOF - 40 YEAR WARRANTY ASPHALT SHN6LES B - FASCIA - PAINTED 2X12 BOARD WITH PREFINISHED METAL GUTTERS WHERE REQUIRED G - WALL - PANTED GEMENTITIOUS CLADDING PANELS WITH TRIMS D - STAINED WOOD TRELLIS E - GLAZING - VINYL FRAME (SEE ACOUSTIC REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE BELOW) F - RAILING - WOOD WITH GLASS INSERTS 6 - WALL - PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS BOARD AND BATON SIDING (SEE ACOUSTIC REQUREMENTS SCHEDULE BELOW FOR BEDROOMS AT EXTERIOR WALLS) H - WALL - PANTED CEMENTTIOUS SHAKE SIDING (SEE ACOUSTIC REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE BELOW FOR BEDROOMS AT EXTERIOR WALLS) J - DECORATIVE KNEE BRACE - PAINTED WOOD K - PRIVACY WALL - PANTED GEMENTITIOUS HORIZONTAL SIDING L - RAILING - WOOD WITH CAST IRON PICKETS - WALL - PAINTED GEMENTITIOUS HORIZONTAL SIDING (SEE ACOUSTIC REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE BELOW FOR BEDROOMS AT EXTERIOR WALLS) N - WALL - BRICK VENEER 0 - CONCRETE LINTEL P - PLANTER - CONCRETE WITH BRICK VENEER Q - COLUMN - HEAVY TIMBER R - COLUMN - BRICK VENEER 5 - GLAZING - PREFINGHED ALUMINUM STORE FRONT T - PLANTER - PAR6ED CONCRETE U - DECORATIVE KNEE BRACE - HEAVY TIMBER V - MIDBAND - PANTED 2X12 W - ENTRY FEATURE - HEAVY TIMBER X - HEAVY TIMBER LNTEL Y - WINDOW PLANTER BASKET - PREFIWSHED METAL Z - O/H GARAGE DOOR -INSULATED, PREFINISHED METAL - GLASS BLOCK OPENING ACOUSTIC REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE 0 6 �A( e N AR NO ONE PANE OF &LASS e,E ° (TWO ITS R s SEPARATED AT GINE, �H PRS, E m PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LAYER Of 5/8" 6TPSUM BOARD At BEDROOM EXTERIOR WALLS DOUBLE ALL SOL/TH PAGANS BEDROOM SLIDINS VASS DOORS ■II iwi1= 1■■I' =1■�■II= 1�1==1iil', =I=m -1- Illlllllllllllll�llllllll �i ■=1=M I11IIIIIi•1111111111111111111111111111111111 ■a6 i ■ ■ rde 11111111111111 I I I A 111 11111111111111 o- o- 6. o6wwwww6we' eR.w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T vI/ ERI.,En:1 4IIIIIlI ■■I■uI■■ Ii I IIIIIIIIIIII ROOF PEAK 14813 �� 25.61m 111111111 111111 111111Il1 I01 -I. ■ 11111111111111111111111111 I!1111111111111111l11111111 gPPROX_EXIST.G GRADE .___,._..._ OUTLINE OF LN/S PARKINS - - - - - - - -- - -- --- ----- -- ---- 0 0 Y 0 0 © E EAST ELEVATION SCALE : I/8" = I' -O" 0 T/O FASCIA140.00 23.19m _FOURTH FLOOR 130.00 T/O GONG. TOPPING _ THIRD FLOOR 120.00 T/O GONG. TOPPING _ SECOND FLOOR 110.00 T/O GONG. TOPPING FIRST FLOOR 100.0E T/0 SUSP. SLAB 1 1.00m UNDERGROUND PARKING 90.16 T/O CONCRETE SLAB AT PERIMETER 8.00m Sal 07. RENSEJ FOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FEB 20E FCR DE•ON PAN1 JAN n pR PRISED FOR DEW.01143. PEWIT 00. 201 1.7,EDucAr0,„&i,DEVEOPMENI PERMIT REVISIONS CONSULTANT. PROJECT, CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT PoVER ROAD MAPLE RIDGE BC. DATE JULY R. 2010 VB =Iro wE. UT DRAWING TITLE PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS JOB NO : 1009 SHEET NO P-12 APPENDIX C-1 641-8)-3200F PEAK 25.61m 140.00 T/O FASCIA 25.19m 6O.00 FOURTH FLOOR_ T/O GONG. TOPPING 120.00 THIRD FLOOR T/0 CONC. TOPPING 10.00 SECOND FLOOR T/O CONC. TOPPING 100.00 _FIRST FLOOR _ I 1.00m T/O SUSP. SLAB 0 © O O 0 0 0 1=1 IM IF 1111 1■1 11111111111111111111111 1111 1111IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 'mu 111111111 IIIIPIIPI9111111 ■■ (IIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111111 1■1 1111 11 11 1IMI I i I I SI ■I IMO �_E1� II1II 1111111111111111111 Trim Him 1111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111111 (IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII i 11111AI •• II 111111 11 1111 -11111R11 i, NEN NEN IEEE -33 MN UN NE -_ IuuulYM -ITS IT1 __ -- I��Ilnl�l---= =1Mi1m11GN1M1 ___: gots i II� lu t,== - 0 kt um.... 11 9016 UNDERGROUND PARKING our4 20 OF 1,1/6, PARKINS 5.00m T/O CONCRETE SLAB I AT PERIMETER BUILDING FINISHES 77, 111 1■ =uuui .. 1 II 1111 7 1 LJ NORTH ELEVATION SCALE : I/8" = 4-0' A - ROOF - 40 YEAR WARRANTY ASPHALT SHINGLES B - FASCIA - PAINTED 2X12 BOARD WITH PREFINSHED METAL GUTTERS WHERE REQUIRED G - WALL - PAINTED GEMENTITIOUS CLADDING PANELS WITH TRIMS D - STAINED WOOD TRELLIS E - GLAZING - VINYL FRAME (SEE ACOUSTIC REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE BELOW) F - RAILING - WOOD WITH GLASS INSERTS G - WALL - PAINTED CEMENTITIOUS BOARD AND BATON SIDING (SEE ACOUSTIC REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE BELOW FOR BEDROOMS AT EXTERIOR WALLS) H - WALL - PAINTED GEMENTITIOUS SHAKE SIDING (SEE ACOUSTIC REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE BELOW FOR BEDROOMS AT EXTERIOR WALLS) J - DECORATIVE KNEE BRACE - PAINTED WOOD K - PRIVACY WALL - PAINTED GEMENTITIOUS HORIZONTAL SIDING: L - RAILING - WOOD WITH GAST IRON PICKETS M - WALL - PAINTED GEMENTITIOUf HORIZONTAL SIDING (SEE ACOUSTIC REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE BELOW FOR BEDROOMS AT EXTERIOR WALLS) N - WALL - BRICK VENEER 0 - CONCRETE LINTEL P - PLANTER - CONCRETE WITH BRIGK VENEER 0 - COLUMN - HEAVY TIMBER R - COLUMN - BRICK VENEER 5 - GLAZING - PREFINSHED ALUMINUM STORE FRONT T - PLANTER - PAR6ED CONCRETE U - DECORATIVE KNEE BRACE - HEAVY TIMBER V - MIDBAND - PAINTED 2X12 W - ENTRY FEATURE - HEAVY TIMBER X - HEAVY TIMBER LINTEL Y - WINDOW PLANTER BASKET - PREFMISHED METAL Z - 0/H GARAGE DOOR -INSULATED, PREFINBHED METAL 4 - GLASS BLOCK OPENING ACOUSTIC REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE 0 s4 O2ATE0 BVN A & ARsPsPAAGE)Nv 0Ne FAN: "4— 00002010 Q Paas-ae(127,17al,r-r'i-gi'm er r "'Ar=7002 oNE Q VArtilg one°P4 r .„*1772 s.oOR si®ss 00 01 sP�Acws FROM FRR E) PROVIDE ADICIVONAL LATER OF s/e^ 0w10UM BOARD AT BEDROOM E` TEROR PALLS D OUBLE ALL SOSTX FACIES BEDROOM SLOONS &LASS DOORS S EE ACCOST. CONSULTANT REPORT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNW ZED 0 114 II il-_T m.= ©'—� (IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 g1ILHE OF UN/6 PARKNB m meas 1" -=-1111 I I III I!! 111 0 0 0 0 0 WEST ELEVATION SCALE : I/8" = 1'-0" 0 0 0 0 0 ROOF PEAK 148.13 25.69m T/O FASCIA 140.0C1 28409 _ FOURTH FLOOR 130.00 7/0 GONG. TOPPING THIRD FLOOR 120.00 T/0 GONG. TOPPING SECOND FLOOR 110.00 T/0 GONG. TOPPING FIRST FLOOR 100.00 T/O SUSP. SLAB I 1.00m UNDERGROUND PARKING 9016 T/0 CONCRETE SLAB AT PERIMETER 8.00m RN 07. 20a1V.0 FOR DENIONIENT PERMIT FM 21 2012 EVISED FCR P.O. 2012 REM. FOR DENIONVON PRAM .14N I .12 REVISED FCR GENII:MEW PD., LEG 11.11 FUMED FOR oeaO»sar MAR IX XI 1=0,t144DEVDORMINT RERMIT REVISIONS CONSULTANT: w 1, C a in PROJECT, CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT AD ma. RIDGE BC. DATE 11J1.0 N. 2010 -ro DRA,VM. W.F. ,H DRAWING TITLE PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS JOB NO 1009 SHEET NO P-13 APPENDIX C-2 GABLE DETAIL SCALE : I/7 = I' -d' ELITE ELITE SUITE etITE 171"Mi SLATE SUITE SUITE SUITE SUITE SURE LANE STORAGE LANE RIVER ROAD SECTION B SCALE : I/8" = I' -O" UNDERbROUND PARKINS SECTION A SCALE : I/8" = I' -O" ACOUSTIC REQUIREMENTS MERIIM EXTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLY: 5/1S. RIARZIPLANK SIDE. P LYWOOD RANSDREEN STRAP,. AND AR CAVITY B LILDNER PAPER /D' PLYWOOD SHEATHE& X 0 WOOD STUDS IR 20 BATT INSULATION ERR EPPSUM PROVIDE ADOttIONALL LAYER OF SgY OVPSUM BOARD AT BEDROOM EXTERCIR WALLS EXCEPT AT UNITS 'E' I 'F nN 3I3op ISIM,« DEVEL«PBJI PRIM 64. 201.4 FENS1D FOR .13.01143,11.1111 - MAR 00. XI IZLIE12APO,A,1.1101MIN1 HUAI REVISIONS CONSULTANT: C PROJECT: CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT MR ROAD MARE RIDGE. BC. DATE JULY P. 2010 Ve"=Iro WE. JH DRAWING TITLE PRELIMINARY BUILDING SECTIONS A & B JOB NO 1009 SHEET NO P-14 APPENDIX D 46.43 �HI\ L 0 0 0 PLANT SCHEDULE KEY OTT BOTANICAL NAME AB 0133 RH 1 T 2 GRASS PERENNIAL GC ACER CIRCINATUM ACER PALMATUM ➢ISSECTUM 'ATROPURPUREUM' STREET TREE ABELIA EDWARD GOUCHER DAPHNE MORA T HYDRANGEA PANICULATA'LIME LIGHT' NANDINA DOMESTICA PICEA ARIES 'OHLENDORFFII' PIERIS JAPONICA 'LITTLE HEATH' RHODODENDRON 'MANITOU' TAXUS X MEDIA 'HICKS,,' HEMEROCALLIS BONANZA ATHYRIUM NIPPONICUM PICTUM 'REGAL RED' BLECHNUM SPGANT CAREX 'PRAIRIE FIRE' ERICA CORNEA 'DARK BEAUTY' RUBUS CALCYINOIDEN COMMON NAME VINE MAPLE RED CUTLEAF JAPANESE MAPLE 6CM CAL, 1.211 STD, BOB PINK ABELIA FRAGRANT DAPHNE LIME LIGHT HYDRANGEA, LIMEGREEN-PINK HEAVENLY BAMBOO OHLENDORFFII DWARF SPRUCE JAPANESE ANDROMEDA, VARIEGATED DWARF MANITOU RHODODENDRON,PINK HICK'S YEW BLUE FESCUE BONANZA DAYLIL'I, ORANGE -YELLOW REB REB JAPANESE PAINTED FERN DAERERFERN ,RIE FIRE SEDGE DARK BEAUTY HEATHER CRAWLING RASPBERRY M2 JOB NUMBER: 10-292 PLANTED 812E / REMARKS 15M HT, BOB, 3 STEN CLUMP 03 POT SPECIES BY CITY 02 POT, 30CH 02 POT O2 POT, 50CM 43 POT, SOCH 112 POT O2 POT 42 POT 10M BOB PI POT NI POT, 1-2 FAN 01 PUT Ol POT, 20CM El POT NPOT I POT, 15CM NOTES. M PLANT SIZES IN THIS LIST ARE SPECIFIED ACCORDING TO THE BC LANDSCAPE STANDARD, LATEST EDITION. CONTAINER SIZES SPECIFIED AS PER CNTA STANDARDS. BOTH PLANT SIZE AND CONTAINER SIZE ARE THE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE SIZES. E REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR DEFINED CONTAINER MEASUREMENTS AND OTHER PLANT MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS, E SEARCH AND REVIEW: MAKE PLANT MATERIAL AVAILABLE FOR OPTIONAL REVIEW BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Ai SOURCE OF SUPPLY, AREA OF SEARCH TO INCLUDE LOVER MAINLAND AND FRASER VALLEY. E SUBSTITUTIONS. OBTAIN WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO MAKING ANY SUBSTITUTIONS TO THE SPECIFIED MATERIAL. UNAPPROVED SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE REJECTED. ALLOW A MINIMUM OF FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO DELIVERY FOR REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE. SUBSTITUTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO BC LANDSCAPE STANDARD - DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS OF AVAILABILITY. ALLPLUM MATERIAL MUST BE PROVIDED FROM CERTIFIED DISEASE FREE NURSERY. PROVIDE CERTIFICATION UPON REQUEST. -�1 I.MMF2.NEMaP.E. 021nm r U■1. i. Cr �!+} _ r a. I.l�o.r■1.1 A► _ r M —7111:1 arc AIL ietas6 Ear v/ PISSI RKING 5 1'L'Jl\"�-i NG SHOR TERM BICYCLE PARKING (14 0 LENT EX, ASPHACt PARKING LGi IwR¢x A ¢c,Ras RIVER ROAD DISTRICT OF MAS R LAMP STAN➢ARDS UTILITY PW ES SIDEWALK CROSSINGS, CATCH BASINS HYDRANTS VALVE ROBES, SERVICES, MANHOLES SEWER SERVICES STREET CANNERS/SITE TRIANGLE BUILDINGS, COL.NAR TREES SPREAD,. TREES DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS, SMALL TREES MEDILW TREES LARGE TREES REET TREE PLANTING REOUIREMENTS GAM 3.011 2.OM LSM 2.5M 2.0,1 1014 SAY NOTES TTREES MAY BE PLACED ABOVE A UTILITY PROVI.0 THAT THE UTILITY HAS A MINIMUM 0.0M COVER. 2. STREET TREES SMALL BE SPACED FR. 9M TO IGH ON CENTRE DEPENDING ON THE SPECIES SELECTED AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. ACTLWL TREE NUMBERS, SPACING b LOCATIAYS WILL VARY ACCORDING TO E%TSiiNG SITE COPAPLIS AND SPECtES SELECTED. LOCATIONS i0 BE STAKE➢ BY THE LONTRACiOR ACCORDING i0 THE PLANS AND VERIFIED ON SITE BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, PLANTING.PRIOR TO ALOCATION CAN BE PERFORMED IF OBSTWCTIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED REWIRING MAJORALTE ION ALTERATIONS THE PLANTING PLAN ARE TO BE REPORTED TO THE DISTRICT OF MAPLERIDGE RESOLUTION. WARRANTY L REPLACEMENTS (TME FOLLOWING IS IN ADDITION TO THOSE ITEMS LISTED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS, • DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, THE OWNER SHALL REPLACE ALL TREES THAT DIE, ARE DAMAGED OR HAVE FAILED i0 GROW SATISFACTORILY AS DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, • ALL REPLACEMENTS SHALL BE WITH TREES of THE SAME SPECIES, VARIETY AND SIZE AS THE ORIGINAL PLANTING PLAN. • THE WARRANTY ON REPLACEMENT TREES SHALL EXTEND FORA PERIOD EQWL i0 THE ORIGINAL WARRANTY PERIOD. • AFTER ONE YEAR MAINTENANCE PERIOD IS COMPLETE, THE DEVELOPER HAS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CNPLETE FINAL REVIEW OF STREET TREES. 5CONTACT LANDSCAPE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR INSPECTION CF STREET TREES. STREET TREES TU MEET 0ISTARIDGE STANDARDS G LAWN CAMPLETINN OF WORK, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AS -BUILT MARK-UP OF STREET TREE LOCATIONS TO LMVDS[APE ARCHITECT FOR SUBMISSIW! i0 CITY. war EXlSTIN� gUI�DINU LUMUJ,-.i46S SPE cIFI(ATIONS rr•�.tirrr�i"r—r•rr,-- — rroi M2 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE .10 - AF Ae� Hs:•.FM, ISI•N;: TE OE YYI-n.0 1.1.4.111 OSIERS REV. PER CIVISPIEGVIA4 REV PER SITS COPENTS REV. PER POP POPEPTS SPE PL.M., REV PEP CPS PM REV PER cr,,,azva DOADIENTY REVISION DESCRIPTION CONDOMINIUM PROJECT RIVER ROAD MAPLE RIDGE, BC MAPLE RIDGE FILE: E08-015-1028 DAMAX FILE: F-11-467 DRAWING TITLE LANDSCAPE PLAN -MAIN FLOOR DATE: MEC. DESIGN: RH CHM: DM DRAWING NUMBER: L1 OF 3 MZIA PROJECT NUMBER. 10-232 MAPLE RIDGE QIN ish tokumhra District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 17, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2013-027-DVP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: CoW SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit 10412, 10450 and 10500 Jackson Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Development Variance Permit application 2013-027-DVP has been received in conjunction with rezoning application 2012-040-RZ and subdivision application 2012 -040 -SD to rezone the lands to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) and RS -1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) for a subdivision of approximately 128 lots. The requested variances are to: increase the height of the retaining walls from the maximum permitted height of 1.2 metres for some portions of the retaining walls; and to reduce the road servicing requirements within the 104 Avenue and 248 Street right-of-ways where the pedestrian walkways will be constructed. It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2012 -016 -VP be approved. Council considered rezoning application 2012-040-RZ and granted first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6919-2012 on May 22, 2012. Council granted first and second reading for Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6984-2013 on April 23, 2013, and second reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6919-2012 on April 23, 2013. This application was presented at Public Hearing on May 21, 2013 and Council granted third reading on May 28, 2013. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2013-027-DVP respecting property located at 10412, 10450 and 10500 Jackson Road. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: Morningstar Homes Ltd. Morningstar Homes Ltd. Lot 1, except part subdivided by Plan 42419, Section 10, Township 12, NWD Plan 12923 Lot 12, Section 10, Township 12, NWD Plan 42419 Lot 2, Section 10, Township 12, NWD Plan 12923 OCP: Existing: Medium Density Residential, Low/Medium Density Residential Proposed: Medium Density Residential, Low/Medium Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) and A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) and RS -1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) 1104 Surrounding Uses North: South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Concurrent Applications: b) Requested Variances: Single Family R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Medium Density Residential Single Family, Park R-1 (Residential District), M-2 (General Industrial) Medium Density Residential, Conservation Proposed Townhouse development RM -1 (Townhouse Residential), A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Medium Density Residential, Conservation Vacant, Inactive Gravel Operation RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) Low/Medium Density Residential Inactive Gravel Extraction Site Single Family Residential 6.195 hectares (15.3 acres) Jackson Road, 104 Avenue, 105A Avenue, 248 Street Urban Standard 2012 -040 -SD, 2012 -040 -DP, 2013 -027 -DP, 2012 -040 -SP 1. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No 3510 -1985, Section 403 (8) Maximum Retaining Wall Height: a. To vary the maximum height of the retaining wall in the rear yards of Lots 82 to 92 and 94 to 95 from 1.2 metres up to a maximum of 2.1 metres. b. To vary the maximum height of the lower retaining wall in the rear yards of Lots 121 to 130 from 1.2 metres up to a maximum of 2.4 metres. c. To vary the maximum height of the upper retaining wall in the exterior side yard of Lot 131 from 1.2 metres up to a maximum of 2.8 metres at the south end. 2. Subdivision and Development Services Bylaw No. 4800-1993, Schedule A - Services and Utilities: To reduce the servicing requirements for portions of 104 Avenue and 248 Street road right-of-way where pedestrian walkways will be constructed. c) Project Description: The development site is comprised of three lots east of Jackson Road and north of 104 Avenue, which are commonly referred to as the "Allard gravel pit", with an area of 6.195 hectares (15.3 acres). The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject site from RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) and A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) and RS -1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit a future subdivision of approximately 128 lots. A tot lot is proposed on the southeast corner of 104 Avenue and Robertson Street. -2- As a former gravel extraction operation, the site has been extensively excavated over many years and there is no remaining natural landscape. The applicant began filling the site in 2012, with Soil Permit 2012 -040 -SP, and the work will continue this year to achieve a series of terraces on the site and a small area in the southeast corner with some steeper slope. The proposed subdivision plan will provide road connections through the site between the existing roads to the north and south (Robertson and McEachern Streets), construct a cul-de-sac on 248 Street, and complete the 104 Avenue connection to Jackson Road. A rear lane will provide vehicle access for the R-3 lots along Jackson Road and the lots on the west side of Robertson Street. A pedestrian walkway will be constructed to connect 104 Avenue at McEachern Street to the new cul-de-sac at the south end of 248 Street. The developer of this application is working with the developer of the townhouse development to the east (10480 248 Street) to coordinate re -grading works and site servicing requirements. On May 28, 2013 Council granted third reading to this project, subject to the inclusion of an additional condition directing the applicant to provide further green spaces and tot lot play areas within the development. The applicants are working with their landscape archtiects to address this condition. The requested variances are not impacted by the requirement to provide additional green spaces and play areas. d) Planning Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for single family development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. To mitigate the significant drop in elevation from the east to the west side of the site, the developer is creating multiple terraces across the site. As part of the comprehensive regrading of the site, and to achieve relatively flat, useable rear yards for many of the homes, the developer is proposing to construct retaining walls along the rear lot lines on the middle and upper terraces, and along the exterior side yard of the lot in the southeast corner where it is adjacent to the walkway. Section 408 (3) of the Zoning Bylaw, along with the definition of "Retaining Wall Grade Line", regulates the maximum height and separation of retaining walls. The maximum exposed height of a retaining wall is 1.2 metres (4 feet), and multiple walls must be separated by a minimum horizontal distance of 1.2 metres (4 feet). The single retaining wall on the rear of the lots on the west side of McEachern Street (middle terrace) will range in height from 0.5 metres to 2.1 metres, and therefore exceeds the maximum height by as much as 0.9 metres (3 feet) with the highest portion on Lot 86. Double retaining walls will be located on the rear of the lots on the west side of 248 Street. The lower wall will be 1.2 metres in height, and does not exceed the maximum height. The upper wall will be separated from the lower one by 1.5 metres and will range in height from 0.4 metres to 2.4 metres. The wall on Lot 121 does not exceed the maximum height, but south of that lot the wall exceeds the maximum height by 1.2 metres for much of its length. Another double retaining wall will be located on the lot in the southeast corner of the site adjacent to the walkway. The lower wall will be 1.2 metres in height, and does not exceed the maximum height. The upper wall will be separated from the lower one by 1.5 metres and will range in height from 0.3 metres to 2.8 metres. This wall exceeds the maximum height by up to - 3 - 1.4 metres at the south end. The upper wall will be located 2.7 metres from the east property line, and will be separated from the walkway by a fence on the property line. The applicant has provided the following justification for the requested retaining wall height variances. At Morningstar we use in-depth questionnaires that are sent to each new homeowner to find out what they liked best and what we could have done to make their home better. We've done this for all 1,600 homes we have built and sold in the last 12 years. These questionnaires offer incredible insight to what home owners want when they purchase a new home. One of the most common comments is about flat useable yards. As a developer who builds on its own lots we do not try to create the cheapest lots possible. Over height retaining walls are expensive but on the Allard site they will allow Morningstar the opportunity to offer a useable a flat rear yard to as many homes as possible. As a developer and builder we can use the wall systems to comprehensively grade the site to create multiple terraces that will allow us to give the future residents a flat, usable back yard. The developer will be constructing the walls from grey interlocking blocks and will install landscaping within the terraced area between the double retaining walls. The fence for the upper lots will be located on the top of the upper walls. For safety and liability reasons, the retaining walls will be located on the upper lots, where the owners take responsibility for maintaining the walls that retain the soil on their lots. A right-of-way will be required to allow the municipality access to the municipal services located adjacent to each wall. An access easement will be required on the lower lots to allow the owners of the upper lots to access the walls for maintenance. A covenant will allow the owners of the lower lots to maintain the landscaping within the terraced area between the walls if they choose to as it is only visible to those owners. The Engineer's drawings are attached as Appendix C, showing the site grading, location of the walls and detail drawings. The developer has provided cross sections between the upper and lower lots in various locations to illustrate the proposed walls, which are attached as Appendix D. The second variance required for this development is for the 104 Avenue and 248 Street road right-of-ways where the pedestrian walkway will be located. The developer will be constructing the walkway, including stairs where necessary, to connect the east end of the road on 104 Avenue to the new cul-de-sac on 248 Street and to connect with existing trails to the southern portion of 248 Street and southwest through parkland. The walkway will be constructed because it is not feasible to construct a road in those areas due to the steep grades. Therefore, a variance to road servicing requirements of Schedule A - Services and Utilities of the Subdivision and Development Services Bylaw No. 4800-1993 is required. e) Interdepartmental Implications: The Engineering Department supports the variance to reduce the road servicing requirements and supports the variances to the retaining wall height if the following conditions are met: • The wall must be constructed with the loading capacity to allow the safe access of District vehicles for maintenance of the sewer; and • Any tie backs must not interfere with the installation or maintenance of the storm sewer and must be located below the pipe bedding. The developer's engineer will ensure that these conditions are met in the design for the walls. -4- The Building Department supports the variances to the retaining wall height. The applicant is proposing to construct the walls this summer during the second phase of filling of the site. This will be prior to subdivision approval; therefore a Building Permit must be issued by the Building Department for construction of the walls. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed retaining wall height variances are supported by the Planning Department because the proposed retaining walls will provide relatively level rear yards with more useable open space for the residents, and because the developer will construct visually attractive walls constructed with textured interlocking blocks and planted with appropriate landscaping. The developer will also provide the necessary covenants, easements and right-of-ways to ensure the walls are accessible and can be maintained. The proposed variance to reduce the road servicing requirements is supported by the Planning Department because a walkway connection will be provided where a road connection is not feasible due to the steep grades. It is therefore recommended that this application be favourably considered and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Development Variance Permit 2013-027-DVP. "Original signed by Ann Edwards" Prepared by: Ann Edwards, CPT Senior Planning Technician "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Site Plan Appendix C - Engineer's drawings for retaining walls Appendix D - Cross Sections showing retaining walls between upper and lower lots - 5 - APPENDIX A rtpi VI N172ofSE174 SK 6504F 4 5 P 75957 P 72100 7 7a 8 7n P 72100 10 4 P 1$280 5 P 75957 s P 72103 INAVE. iF„.- 75 74'”73"72�71i70 65 68P 235+4 67 68 69 CI Pitt Mea s ows Scale: 1:3,000 V District of Langley FRASER R. �\ ,BRAV_ 555 F./ 43 25/ BCP 35341 BCP 35341 P 1205 N 1d2 1 10412/50 & 10500 JACKSON ROAD MAPLE RIDGE BrilEsh COIN mbla CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Mar 21, 2013 FILE: 2013 -027 -DP BY: PC APPENDIX B PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLAN OF LOT 1 PLAN 12923 EXCEPT PART SUBDIVIDED BY PLAN 42419, LOTS 1 AND 23 PLAN BCP36341 AND LOT 2 PLAN 12923 ALL OF SECTION 10 0 TOWNSHIP 2 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT QOP SCALE ]:500 >o � 'All [Lances are in 1.1etrea. " vu,v1 nro.3 1 1034 A�N�F 36 105A AVENUE ss 118 .1 2912 2a 119 33.1912 30.876 33 020 37212 122 37.332 39.068 124 930,7,92 8 311 o _ _ ACM ioo0m 059 55 000 85z 86 383.2.92 36.140 87 88 41.409 78. 4 2 44 043 55.987 102 101 51.814 100 46 066 98 420 1992 .539 s 92 0 93g R 940. R 972 128 9 acLaeySurveying a. naSurvu s .11092.33,513 27.440 26 064 11000 11.000 11.090. 10 900 96 51.875 47 595 104th AVENUE V.; 20.117 20.117 43 PLAN BCP36.I 44 PLAN BCP -16,1 REM 1 PLAN BCPS5626 © me 3otn , r 17141 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Engineering Department DESIGNED B PRA BC APPENDIX C BENCHMARK: ELEVATIONS MERE DERIVED FROM THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, BENCHMARK 85X0702 LOCATED ALONG JACKSON AVE., NORM OF 10418 AVE. ELEVATION = 78.813m macumormuch. LANo 320-8988 SERVICES FRASERTON COURT BURNABY, BC 839 5H8 19. (604)299 0605 fax. (604)299 0029 GRAPHIC SCALE: GRAPHIC SCALE —10 0 10 20 SCALE: 1:500 SEAL: 13/0A/0a SR CN PRELIMINARY SUBMISSION REVD DATE DRN cHD APPROVED— CH PPR 2013 PROPOSED ALLARD SUBDIVISION GRADING PLAN CONSULTANTS I 92 6HEET OF — 910 880 07.0 7g, g4a0 84.0 810 020 81.0 051w CIEAR CRLIS11 OPollf4 ENSMG OLE /115-1200 Wed 73 -rd ha lbdowner, LIC Covdo 695 Geo1=‘;h-r-:" two 0-1111 Consultants Ltd Fel 114 410-8111 DM E APRIL 9, 20I3 APPV. T:FN. fir: cr suit, AS SMAIN SWJkW A SCALE = 1•100 PROPOSED An/01K DEVIIOPMaff AXON HAD & 104 Afralli, AMPLE RIX BC RE1-ROCK WILL - SECDON A LEGEND: - TOP 0 1141 &147 - J7 F IIN1 away Aff$: -MAN BM OF 200,r RRXRD AT MST 0 F NIL -REDI-ROCK POW MS RE MEM AS PO? REL/ -/W ?MUM NAV NA11116 A 2 2013 • • •). . 10512 Tatioa k 2011 0%. 64,02 c. • I • 1 10i0- 101..0 1010 101.0" 101.0 1000 99.0 930' 97.0' 930 950 94.0 - 910 Lo 4-- iI 1 FACE 8Y OWNS L..o 4 12! RA'-ROEX flit 41' a 071' muco, RI a 11IP Ma ..t!). Minn CHINE DWI r � ��v filly_Roc,gillii; 11111 w •i •- , .Y GEOILXIIE INIM; (PROSY 144-601 OR E0010194 111.11 115 Ilt Mg( i AC1SWd Ii[ I100am PE FLIM D HC WE ROMI rut If/MIT 'i. W fllFi/f[LI osar(fife a07MJ .1, Pliti . PRO�EISEO r: 0 iR AVIIIMINEIMI irr 1 =1..&n u�'�"' s MC 16' EMDCK MP.) •A'''''. LEV LN. PAO ACW-16471 VOW (finYEX M1-601 07 mummy f� Om CLEAR 0PD9I OW WINE PIE I107un MEMO PPE 07371K OW /115-11107 re 71-10,art Cmtr 1&P as "' (all Consultants Ltd. For M4 +svuv ATI 80711 CH& Int Cr OPPb. KB X SIM 202L1- SY E=1.160 PROPOSED RESIDENK DEWLOPMINT AXON RCNO & 104 A6fMi INPLE /dam BC /dlI-ROCK MIL - MOON B 1IGENp- - ITV OF MILL EIEI'AAW - MOM 0' MMIC E111011011 -BEAD W16771 ID BE 1FASl,19D FROM FRONT FACE OF MIL - IMAM 0'10011 OF 4007m IO70liEO AT ME OF REA'-0 l WL - REM-ROCK FACE IMIS 10 BE ANTED AS PER REIA-ROCK 1571WCIION 014& W AAD WOWS - CEOCRD 10 EF PIKED MIN SWAG MS PERP010CLUR TO Nil LICE -BI71IL INTERN TO 0115& 0T ME 1011 AS DERE II OMtZO-Re -DEA7M!1 10 0A65T OF IOW 55T APP 2 5 2013 FiC 16L 10512 AMC 1( 2011 EWA- G-RU3 1050 10%0 1010 1020 101.0 1020 9.20 920 97.0 960 950 94.0 9.10 - 92.0 - 91.0 9100 HMI Br 10 1 z +E6 1 Milt 18. 10P &OCR 9 R:Lv-ROCK MIL 41'fiYX /Z. .O1ynn PINEY DRS.„...,;,..,...,-,,x,--,� -\ rk ROV i0f& GfO1E E ova nw-1102 Th1J t*r CRAW PPE /100mn PO2LWA)1D RL PA' ffir-Raar WIilffig=X. 2e T0° [LOGY1 f i . ` TOTAL MEL WIN 41m 11,.. _"r f Of 1 fill PIP afgair MY BLOCA9 PIK — .N WEED raw - '1,,s4' QomSEM MiKR1V 5rT 1=1.6m R&-ROCY «1 ze sax imp.) [iY l% Ail (dim CLEW CRUSH 1:04341) MN-tvel Gomm / (RPp"LX tow -so? 01 ETXIYA1ThV !WWI PPE MaoPERF09 O AC RRC 1115-120 We 73 -ed At Vermeer, EC Comb iti° 665 p eocs-\ consuldints Ltd. Fa XV 43D-9110 wTE ANBL 9, 2017 UN. 91. CT. '- LB AS SHOW S .C7kW 81 sow = r. r00 PROPOSED W DEVELOPMENT actrav RCND & 104 AIM& UI4!E WS& BC REDI-ROff MNL - SECTION B1 Iffic`' 10512 IMC-114 ▪ � - 871100 0f MVl 0.EI4/9711 1 EG£kp: - TOP GY 11N ELWIN I - GRD LIM71110 B<IFASICRED FROM PRKM9FACE 0HML - MGM 0211W Of 40Chm Rf06/2.D AT B& 0• spar( InL - RA-ROCK ROC 141I5 TO BE AS4IHLD AS ffR RfrY-Rn mum MAL ND CLQ'lNS -CFO RV TO B< PUa0 SID13702'.V AXES R7Pi INVIL49.10 MILL FKE -64CA011 !Altai 10 C0/657 Cr PPE 1 101 AS ORO 1 DV G409 - Q'OCRD 1D MST 0f WWI) 510 AN 2 5 203 ZIEKIfi A. AR 14 2012 !sr. aro OM wafer PPE :1100ffn P1TOR4TED RV PIPE 26770N C XV" /:100 GeoFaclfic if".41ff Consultants LtII Fr A) 1.11HOAV IIML MR 9, 2013 oat TIPPPlk AS SHOW PROPSW RESIDDI114L DElflOPMENT Ant7AV ROAD k 101 AM WYE MG& BC REa-i%' - SIC/K.W C N. LEGEND: - TOP OF NAIL Ell-VATTER - BOHR Of MIL MARX -CIOCRI7 thiG77/ 10 W 1FACIRED TROY TRW FICE OF MU - WRY BURR OF 500nm REOIRED AT EKE Of REDI-ROEXV.L -RED1-ROCK FACIE MS 10 EC .4550131.EDASP E R RE01-ROCK 1157RU7� RIM NV Male -CEOCRV 70 Rr PLACED RN SW AVS PERPOOCUIR 10 I L FACE -RCM WNW 70 CONZT Of TYPE 1 /11 AS DEFIED IN ERIC C-09 - CEOCRO TO CCIT767 OF 11124CRID 5rT FIE 111: 10512 ME 110.: RENSIONS: NM 24 MU APR 2 5 2013 P15-1202 Vest 73 -id At •wee; BC Comb 160 61:5 I --C4- / 3 i --4 FENCE BY OTTE7S a. Mlle CR47E ..--------- ,..---------- RELY-ROCK NC 27x 39270 CIRO DWI ---- • .. 117*> 101-110017-71171271E (PROM NI -671 OR allefflE110 - ,-.•-1,7'.. Al- ...---......--, Vrii, ,Lou5..r.7"471Zi':7 - cr: . -.97=--'•-r).- .^.,..- r4k7.-, .11..11111,12i;V,W4V-- i . I, - 11 '.....' (r'...1. '-.Xr . -1 4.'-'-. ME a 111 • ii) .7".. -_,a.-..• -74-..-i•af . - . lad ..-400.4-1-imi....2 4' -; ' 119.1.-.RtIC'..4. . • .', . _-fr'; ,1" - - 1,, 'S - Pile 414,:re.:',9Etlelk-Z • 445 •,- PIN 41.42701:-.1Z-±•- ..-`,--- • -. r•LUItilfztOttg-,s -T-7. :9411 t.-„,,,,,,,..:; ..-:..,-_-.....1.-,,,,r,,,,,,,,-,,,,-,,,,--- GEM NNW 5,rf 14.7m 0,.-+x-•-• ...,.,:r^ IEWUVC RC 101-1904131 1EC710711 (PROM MI -601 Pi BZWILE4 !sr. aro OM wafer PPE :1100ffn P1TOR4TED RV PIPE 26770N C XV" /:100 GeoFaclfic if".41ff Consultants LtII Fr A) 1.11HOAV IIML MR 9, 2013 oat TIPPPlk AS SHOW PROPSW RESIDDI114L DElflOPMENT Ant7AV ROAD k 101 AM WYE MG& BC REa-i%' - SIC/K.W C N. LEGEND: - TOP OF NAIL Ell-VATTER - BOHR Of MIL MARX -CIOCRI7 thiG77/ 10 W 1FACIRED TROY TRW FICE OF MU - WRY BURR OF 500nm REOIRED AT EKE Of REDI-ROEXV.L -RED1-ROCK FACIE MS 10 EC .4550131.EDASP E R RE01-ROCK 1157RU7� RIM NV Male -CEOCRV 70 Rr PLACED RN SW AVS PERPOOCUIR 10 I L FACE -RCM WNW 70 CONZT Of TYPE 1 /11 AS DEFIED IN ERIC C-09 - CEOCRO TO CCIT767 OF 11124CRID 5rT FIE 111: 10512 ME 110.: RENSIONS: NM 24 MU APR 2 5 2013 P15-1202 Vest 73 -id At •wee; BC Comb 160 61:5 NI 111111111111111 11111�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Ell IIIA 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111II111111II IIIIIIIIIIIIIII� Illlllllllllllllj 11111111111111111111111111111 IIh I1 MO 58 11111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111111111 !N/?f//X/. !I/lf.RiY� `/!/!(!✓!!!} illilfIllFi.wlI.1i1111 kit IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII11�� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111._ I�I�IIVIj 11VIIII�1111111 111111 92 APPENDIX D 1111111± / 11111111111111111 �NFfr.1llf. `?#/lf//H. ✓�f!!H/l+//. C'!!l/!✓ll!} //l{//li /I. !!XX!lXIXH r!!r!! /. 11111111111111 IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIII 1111111111111111 IIIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIII11 IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Illlllllllmull 1111111111= 1AMLE RIDGE 9n[i.h eosY«es u^rn .10.)12 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 17, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2013 -039 -AL FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Application to Exclude Land from the Agricultural Land Reserve 20208 Mclvor Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received under Section 30 (1) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act to exclude approximately 1.865 hectares (4.8 acres) of land from the Agricultural Land Reserve. The Applicant's submission conforms with the notice of application requirements of the Agricultural Land Commission. This application is unusual in that the Commission has previously identified and recommended the subject property for exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve. In addition, the subject property is designated Urban in the Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy. For this reason, the property could be developed to an urban standard without senior agency approval. Due to these unique circumstances as discussed further in this report, this application is found to be supportable. RECOMMENDATION: As per Council direction for all ALR exclusion applications the following resolutions are provided for Council's consideration: a) That the application not be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission; b) That the application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with a summary of Council's comments and the staff report. Staff Recommendations: 1. That application 2013 -039 -AL be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission, and 2. that other property owners affected by Commission Resolution 2635/2011 be notified in advance of an application by local government for exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Pivotal Development Consultants Limited Ignacio Chua 1105 Legal Description: Lot 1, D.L. 263, Plan NWP 21483 OCP : Existing: Zoning: Existing: Agricultural RS -3 (One Family Rural Residential) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Urban Residential Zone: RS -lb One Family Urban Residential Designation Urban Residential South: Use: Under application for Urban Residential Zone: RS -3 One Family Designation: Agricultural and Park in ALR (under application) East: Use: Pitt Meadows West: Use: Single Family Urban Residential Zone: RS -1 One Family Urban Residential Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Rural Residential Proposed Use of Property: Urban Residential Site Area: 1.86 Hectares Access: Mclvor Avenue b) Project Description: This application for exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve is unique as it has been identified by the Agricultural Land Commission as appropriate for this purpose. The surrounding context of the site is Urban Residential development. The applicant intends to develop the subject properties in accordance with its surroundings. A watercourse traverses the site on its southern edge. A preliminary development concept plan for the subject property (including riparian compensation) is attached as Appendix "C". A letter of concern has been received from within the community. The specific issues noted in the letter are the loss of habitat, heritage farmland, and the potential for an agricultural future on the subject property. c) Planning Analysis: On July 19, 2004, a report for processing exclusion applications was received by Council outlining legal implications and the local government's role in processing applications for exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve. Council resolved to consider the following options for referring applications to the Agricultural Land Commission: • The application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with no comment. • The application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with comments. 2- • The application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with a recommendation to exclude the property with or without comments. • The application be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission with a recommendation to not exclude the property with or without comments. • The application not be authorized to go forward to the Agricultural Land Commission. Official Community Plan The District of Maple Ridge recognizes the jurisdiction of the Agricultural Land Commission for the Agricultural Land Reserve properties within District boundaries. Towards this end, Policy 6-5 of the Official Community Plan states the following: Maple Ridge will collaborate with other agencies, such as the Agricultural Land Commission, the Ministry of Agriculture, and the Greater Vancouver Regional District to promote and foster agriculture. In this instance, the Commission has identified the subject property as appropriate for exclusion from the Reserve, and has expressed the expectation that an application for its removal will be forwarded as an application by Local Government as part of the Albion Flats exclusion application. The applicant has taken this step to advance the exclusion of the subject property sooner. Remnant Properties - Commission Resolution In 2011, the District forwarded a preliminary concept plan for the Albion Flats to the Commission for their consideration and for future direction. In their response, the Commission directed the District to submit an application by local government for a portion of the Albion Flats site (the properties south of 105th Avenue were considered appropriate for exclusion - subject to certain conditions). In addition, the Commission noted other properties within the District as suitable for exclusion. Commission Resolution 2635/2011, made on October 27, 2011, stated the following (excerpt): ... AND THAT the Commission will expect DMR to submit an application under section 29 of the Agricultural Land Commission Act to exclude from the ALR the land lying south of 105th Avenue and west of 240 Street together with any remnant areas elsewhere in DMR identified by the Commission as being unsuitable for agriculture; Commission approval of such an application may be in part or whole conditional on progress toward the foregoing action plan;... The subject property (20208 Mclvor Avenue) was one of the remnant properties listed as suitable for exclusion from the Reserve. It is one of the few properties so identified with development potential to an urban standard. As noted in the above excerpt, the Commission is expecting the District to include the remaining properties in its application for exclusion of the Albion Flats properties. -3- The implications of exclusion for many of these property owners is not clear. Property owners are eligible for tax concessions if in the Agricultural Land Reserve- this benefit will not longer apply to properties that are excluded. For this reason, it makes sense for the District to contact affected property owners prior to the application by local government for exclusion of the Albion Flats properties. This contact would give an opportunity to hear concerns, outline options, and mitigate possible impacts, if any. Development Implications A preliminary development plan has been provided to illustrate the applicant's intent for the property. In order to realize this plan, the following additional applications will be required: • Official Community Plan amendment from Agricultural to Urban Residential. As the subject property is designated Urban in the Regional Growth Strategy, there is no senior agency impediment to the redesignation of the subject property and its inclusion within the urban area boundary. • Rezoning in accordance with the supportable neighbourhood residential context. The RS -lb One Family Urban Residential Zone is the most consistent within the site area. Dedication for road and riparian property will be a requirement of rezoning. • Subdivision for residential development. • Watercourse Protection Development Permit due to the proximity of the subject property to the watercourse on its southern edge. It is important to note that if this application is forwarded to the Commission, Council is under no obligation to approve the required applications for urban residential development of the subject property. d) Alternatives: This application to exclude the subject property is consistent with Commission direction and is therefore supportable. However, Council has the option of denying this application from proceeding to the Commission. CONCLUSION: This application for exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve is unique as it has been identified by the Agricultural Land Commission as appropriate for this purpose. The surrounding context of the site is Urban Residential development and a preliminary development plan has been submitted that is consistent with the surrounding context. The application is supportable, based on Commission direction. -4- It is noted that the Commission has identified other properties as suitable for exclusion and has notified the District of its expection for being included along with the Albion Flats properties in an application by local government for exclusion from the Agricultural Land Reserve. It would make sense to notify these property owners of this situation and this point has been included in the recommendation of this report, dated June 17, 2013. "Original signed by Diana Hall" Prepared by: Diana Hall Planner "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by Paul Gill" for Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Agricultural Land Commission Correspondence Appendix C - Development Plan proposed by Applicant. 5- APPENDIX A 11 M W N r3 13 r u, o_ P 42 B 3058 7 2Q9> ;, 2°6 5 B 2 3s : 10 9 �"� s 11 v,. 7,1,- c0 A9690 14 41 12 is. s 15 7`''j 1249 5 39 12461 03 7 _ 103 N 0 � N N '0 7 Ns x20225 92. 8 s9 ^rya9� e' 16 38 OC" 24� 17 37 12486 102 7 p 2020 5 •B 8 12 1246 3 � 7. 7 oP,� P62 18 36 7�'s �2p66, N a No NN : 245 7 19 35 mss, 6 C'v 20 BC" . s 58' 34,, a 40 M 6 v 12461 ro o 0 0 11 I p 12451 5 d 21 33 7,, s' ryp^y o^oy 32 'QA6 vs' m 71 5 10 1ZA 9 13 `I ,2441 12442 „,, 2 12451 4 22 s 2 31 7?5149 '2ay 46 McIVOR AVE. 1245 0 LMP 41 51 8 ,23431 124343 3012439 7242........47 12445 45 32 33 M P 42 r 1242 6 2 48 1243 7 1244 0 coo 12421 24 2912429 428 y N in ti cs 0- 87 azs 12430 M 31 34 0_ 2 1241625 12419 12416 BCP 20 N 12425 N 12426/28 Do 12411 28 50 12415 41 (NI d 2O?8. 1 ,zoos 26 12409 43 30421 1212409 35 12422 Pcl. 1 27 12406 51 42 29 12411 36 1240 2,2°218 86 P 21 483 Rem. 1 28 1239 9 37 1240 0 20,28 N Subject Property , 122389 ,2392$ Ln a 85 v EL 0 26 0 d1238 3 1238 29 N A 2025 5 25 1237 con 5 40 Lr, v N 555 42 P 13328 N , i Rem 2 o N P 16 960 N Rem E N 1 N 2 V 1 N 2" ' 87 652 BCP 2116 8 P 36 04 1 a 2 3 s o's� LMP 49634 1116 15 n 310 ' ' 14 N N 13 ' ^ 0 0 N N 12 11 P 84 0:, 9 pp 7 8 P 64 317 2°ry ' 6� "'" tih Rem 1 > ^ry 110 O r'2 '4 123 A v 2o'\a 9 1228 0 21 10 20164 1227210 \C" 12 20176 5273 P 43 023 27p c, 722 5 �? 8 9 412269 0 12266 11 co0 92 93 94 o' 66 ° 722624 ,9634 0 3 a 2zss co v 122600 °`° Q� 3 v P 180 19 20 212261 N mn P 43 023 � S LMP 013 014 m o o L\,\,.Mea I''i Scale: 1:2,500 Ci. f Pitt lows __ es I 20208 Mclvor Ave I RI ,= 13 � M �� ,, Es�^�tgcirmni SLS �E.:�..' E iei� r`'aL� AI Ili ��!'. IJ � elf .. �HP o CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF - 4n. MAI- n_,.ua- C:L- :e 11 diEL E:LI " }''W` +�,�"�,�-_ in MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 District of �� a_ Langley= 7E mi.— ,rMl=�' DATE: Jun 13, 2013 2013 -039 -AL BY: JV BASER Ry,r\ APPENDIX B IT WAS MOVED BY: Commissioner Collins SECONDED BY: Commissioner Miles THAT the Commission not endorse the draft concept plan entirely as submitted, but only in part; THAT DMR be advised that while the Commission is prepared to cooperate towards future commercial or industrial development at Albion Flats, it will do so in conjunction with restoraton of an agricultural future for that part of Albion Flats lying to the north of 105 Avenue; AND THAT focusing on the area north of 105 Avenue the Commission wiU expect DMR to undertake a comprehensive review of drainage and stream flow conditions in the Road Thirteen Dyking District with a view to resolving issues identified in the Golder Associates overview agricultural assessment and the HB Lanarc environmental baseline report, that review to include • preliminary consuttation with Fisheries and Oceans Canada, • preparation of an agricuIturai remedial action plan in consultation with the Commission, the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the land owners, such a plan to address all relevant issues including but not limited to drainage, long term access, buffering or consoidation, and • design to ensure that traffic pattems enable practical access and use by farm vehicles; AND THAT the Commission will expect DMR to submit an application under section 29 of the Agricultural Land Commission Act to exclude from the ALR the land lying south of 105 Avenue and west of 240 Street together with any remnant areas elsewhere in DMR identified by the Commission as being unsuitable for agriculture; Commission approval of such an application may be in part or In whole conditional on progress toward the foregoing action plan; AND THAT this response does not suggest or promote any move to eliminate the use of land at Albion Flats as an agricultural fairground; AND THAT the Commission recognizes that any implementation or action to be taken with respect to the Commission's response to the concept plan will require that DMR and land owners be responsible for complying with applicable Acts, regulations, and decisions of any authorities that have jurisdiction under an enactment. CARRIED Resolution # 2635/2011 Page 3 of 17 Agricultural La 133 4 4 C.anai Burnaby, British Cal p04 660-7000 Fax:1604 660-7033 wwwialc.gov.bc.ca Maoie Ridge ALR lands unsuited to a[iiicuiture or otherwise warranting exclusi Lands in the area bounded by 240 Street, Lougheed Highway, 105 Aenue and its Street. [Albion Flats lands agreed for exclusion] Land in the intersection of 102 Avenue and Jackson Road. [untitled remnant of Jackson Farm] ALR Stock along 112 Avenue and Kanaka Creek, west of 256 Diversion and Palm [Area 7 of the 1983-5 ALR review of Maple Ridge—supported for exclusion from th Lot 11, Plan LMP99941.9 ha area lying north of the southernmost bot ndary of the shown on Plan LMP9994 and to the north of the north boundary of that part of `130 to the east of the trail [exclusion identified in decision on File 35038 (Application ID 40681)] Lots 5 and 6, Plan 20898 [parcels under 2 acres] Rem. Parcel 37, Reference Plan 67082 [Telus parcel under 2 acres]! N1/2 Lot 3, Plan 7893 [parcel under 2 acres] [parcels identified for exclusion in conjunction with File 35783 (Application IO 41721 Lot 2, Plan 5812 Parcel °ONE', Explanatory Plan 17000 [isolated parcels under 2 acres identified for exclusion in conjunction With File 31117 (Application ID 7231)] Commission ay ._ is V5G 4K6 d from the ALP. ojection to 240 r Rolpl7 St 'ALR] )] 14.0 m wide" nnector Road" ALR block south of 128 Avenue immediately west of 232 Street [remainder of an area determined in 2003 to be generally unsuited to!agricuIture] Parcel "A", Plan 54702 Lots 1 and 2, Plan 77941 That part of N% Lot 3, Plan 1161 lying south of the right bank of the 4iouette River That part of NY Lot 40, Plan 1161 lying south of the right bank of the'Alouette River: That part of Lot 41, Plan 1161 lying within the ALR [under File 13962 (Application ID 33952) acknowledged as unsuited o agriculture] Lots 30 to 32, Plan 71095 Lots 1 to 4, Plan LMaP1O26 [existing residential subdivision of ALR parcels which were each under 2 acres] Lot 1, Plan 21483 Statutory rights of way acP14749, acP15373, and BCP24880 (Golden ars Way) [lands identified for exclusion in conjunction with File 29980 (Application ID 3808)] Golden Ears Way south of Lougheed Highway [ALR to be maintained west of constructed area only per File 35696 (Application l * 41 614)] TP/ 26551 sec 29 app APPENDIX C f MAPLE RIDGE British Co lumb la District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 17, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COW SUBJECT: British Columbia Lottery Corporation Request EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Mayor Daykin has referred the attached letter from The BCLC to staff for comment and recommendation. As Council is aware, the new Community Gaming Centre to be located on the Lougheed Highway at 227th is nearing completion and will be open in the Fall. Great Canadian Gaming Corporation, the operators of the facility under Contract to BCLC currently has authority from Council to operate 150 slot machines. BCLC is requesting that Council by resolution, increase this number of slot machines to allow up to a maximum of 200 slot machines at this new facility. The attached letter from the BCLC explains the rationale for this request. Based on the BCLC assessment, the request to increase the number of slot machines from 150 to a maximum of 200 machines appears reasonable. This report recommends that it be approved by Council by resolution. RECOMMENDATION(S): That the number of slot machines permitted at the Community Gaming Centre (Chances) located at 22692 Lougheed Highway be increased to a maximum of 200 slot machines. "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer JLR:sr Attach. 1106 IEM@MLD JUN 1 1 2013 MAYOR June 11, 2013 His Worship Ernie Daykin Mayor District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V8G 2X8 Dear Mayor Daykin: British Columbia Lottery Corporation is responsible to conduct and manage all commercial gaming in British Columbia. Under its authority, BCLC has contracted with Great Canadian Gaming to provide operational services at the community gaming centre, Chances in Maple Ridge. BCLC is writing to the District of Maple Ridge to indicate that it has reviewed its marketplace assessment in your community with respect to the demand for consumer gaming. This review assists BCLC in deciding appropriate levels of gaming equipment as the construction of Chances Maple Ridge nears completion. As a result of this review BCLC has increased its assessment of the number of slot machines needed to serve the Maple Ridge market for the near future, from 150 to 200. Therefore, BCLC is requesting that the District revise the number of slot machines at Chances Maple Ridge to a maximum of 200 machines. The Gaming Control Regulation provides that the host local government such as the District can amend an existing limit on slot machines. We look forward to your Councils consideration of our request to have the number of slot machines increased from 150 to a maximum of 200 at the new Changes facility currently near completion in your community. e playing it right 74 West Seymour Street Kamloops, BC V2C 1E2 T 250.828.5500 250.828.5631 2940 Virtual Way Vancouver, BC V5M 0A8 604.215.0649 604.225.6424 Page 2 June 11, 2013 If you have questions, please contact either me directly at (604) 225-6412, or Mr. Greg Walker, Director, Public Affairs at (604) 225-6410. Sincerely, Jim Lightbody Vice President, Casino & Community Gaming BCLC cc: Mr. Jim Rule Chief Administrative Officer District of Maple Ridge Mr. Greg Walker Director Public Affairs BCLC Mr. Peter Goudron Executive Vice -President Great Canadian Gaming 41, MAPL It/ DOE luw [.wwd. District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 17, 2013 and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COW SUBJECT: Proposed Minor Amendments to Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises Bylaw EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The last amendment to the Untidy and Unsightly Premises Bylaw was completed in April 2011. Since that time it has become apparent that some minor changes are required to deal with changing circumstances. As the District of Maple Ridge is developing there are more occurrences of vacant properties which are not being maintained. The proposed changes will help address this by giving more specific definitions in the bylaw. Having the terms more defined will assist staff in their efforts to have owners maintain their properties in accordance with the bylaw. Japanese Knotweed has become a serious problem in the District of Maple Ridge as this invasive species is now found all along the Lougheed corridor. Adding this plant to the schedule of noxious weeds gives the Municipality the authority to have it removed from private property. The current bylaw states that, when giving notice to the property owner, the property must be posted as well as sending a letter by express post. Many of the unsightly properties are vacant and there is no building on which to post the unsightly notice. Therefore, staff recommends that the requirement for posting an unsightly notice is only applicable if there is an occupied premise. RECOMMENDATION(S): That Bylaw No. 6982-2013 be given first, second and third readings. DISCUSSION: Background Context: The words "unsightly" and "rubbish" are used in the body of the bylaw. These words need to be defined in the definition section. This past year has seen a serious rise in the presence of Japanese knotweed. This species is very invasive and must be controlled. The revised bylaw will include this plant in the Schedule of Noxious Weeds. The notification requirements for this type of Bylaw, where the District can take specific action in a specific time frame are two -fold. The Notice is sent out by Express Post and is also posted at the property of an occupied house. This is to ensure that if the property owner does not acknowledge Page 1of2 1107 receipt of the letter that was sent by mail the one posted at the occupied property provides backup service. However, the wording of the Bylaw currently does not differentiate between a vacant property and an occupied property which causes a notification discrepancy. Previously, vacant properties have been posted by leaving a letter, taped to a tree or fence. This has resulted in private information being easily accessible to anyone in the vicinity. Changing the section of the bylaw from stating that the "Property" must be posted to saying that the "Property" must be posted if there is an occupied premise will protect the privacy of this information. CONCLUSIONS: The amendments to this bylaw will assist with consistency of interpretation and ensure that there is a mechanism to deal with this most recent invasive species. It will also ensure that property owner information is kept secure. "Original signed by R. MacNair" Prepared by: R. MacNair Manager, Bylaw and Licencing Services "Original signed by E.S. (Liz) Holitzki" Approved by: E.S. (Liz) Holitzki Director: Licences, Permits and Bylaws "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng General Manager: Public Works and Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Office RM/ Appendix I - Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises Amending Bylaw No. 6982-2013 Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX I District of Maple Ridge Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises Amending Bylaw No. 6982-2013 A bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises Bylaw No.6533-2007 WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge deems it expedient to amend Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises Bylaw No. 6533-2007; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This bylaw may be cited as Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises Amending Bylaw No. 6982-2013. 2. Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises Bylaw No.6533-2007 is amended by deleting in its entirety the definition of "Noxious Weeds" from Section 2. 3. Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises Bylaw No.6533-2007 is amended by adding to Section 2 the definition: "Rubbish" means decaying or non -decaying solid and semi-solid wastes, including but not limited to both combustible and non-combustible wastes, such as paper, trash, refuse, cardboard, waste material, cans, yard clippings, wood, glass, bedding mattresses, crates, rags, barrels, boxes, lumber not neatly piled, scrap iron, tin an other metal, scrap paving material, discarded appliances, discarded furniture, dry vegetation, weeds, dead trees and branches, overgrown vegetation and trees which may harbor insect or rodent infestations or may become a fire hazard and piles of earth mixed with any of the above. 4. Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises Bylaw No.6533-2007 is amended by adding to Section 2 the definition: "Unsightly" means property having any one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the accumulation of junk, filth, litter, brush, discarded materials, refuse, rubbish, garbage, graffiti; derelict vehicles and vehicle parts; (b) fences characterized by holes, breaks, rot, crumbling, cracking peeling or rusting; (c) landscaping that is dead, characterized by uncontrolled growth or lack of maintenance, or is damaged; or (d) any other similar conditions of disrepair and deterioration. 5. Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises bylaw No. 6533-2007 is amended by removing the second paragraph of Section 10 (1) in its entirety and replacing with: Such Order must be sent in writing by express mail to the Owner of the property where the contravention exists within the time frame set out in the notice. This notice must also be posted on the subject property if there is an occupied premise. 6. Maple Ridge Regulation of Untidy and Unsightly Premises Bylaw No. 6533-2007 is amended by adding to Schedule "A": Japanese Knotweed (Fallopia Japonica) READ A FIRST TIME this day of , 2013. READ A SECOND TIME this day of , 2013. READ A THIRD TIME this day of , 2013. ADOPTED this day of , 2013. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER MAPLE RIDGE fr lrIr.I Cali -m hla []eep hoots Granter liergh1 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 17, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: EO3-012-001 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The District of Maple Ridge (District) operates a Municipal Water Utility under permit by the Fraser Health Authority (FHA) that requires an annual report be prepared and submitted to the FHA, and be available to the public. The report follows the format required by the FHA and is necessarily a largely technical report. To assist the general public, a less technical brochure has been produced and will be available on the District's website and at the Municipal Hall Customer Service Centre. This report is for information and the attached "Drinking Water Quality Report 2012" includes an outline of the regulatory framework, water quality monitoring data for 2012, and explanatory comments on the data. A copy of the report will be placed in the public library and on the corporate website as part of the public information strategy. In 2012, water quality within the District's municipal water distribution system met the standards detailed in the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation. RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information only and no resolution is required. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The District operates a Municipal Water Utility under the provisions of the provincial Local Government Act, and under permit by the Provincial Ministry of Health Services - Fraser Health Authority (FHA). Water quality requirements are stipulated by the Provincial Drinking Water Protection Regulations and administered by the FHA. The District, as a distributor and purveyor of drinking water, is reliant on the Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) for source water quality control. While Coquitlam Lake is the primary source of water delivered to Maple Ridge, the GVWD can supply Maple Ridge with water from Seymour Lake in the event of disruptions at Coquitlam Lake. 1108 The District's drinking water system operating permit requires a water quality monitoring program and that an annual report be prepared and submitted. While the monitoring program provides a representative picture of drinking water quality within municipal mains, it does not provide a definite picture of drinking water quality within buildings, where water quality can change significantly due to pipe materials, standing times, temperature, and other factors. It can be assumed that samples taken within buildings may be of different quality than those taken from municipal mains. The District is not responsible for testing/verifying water quality on private property. The District's water distribution infrastructure includes 380 km of water main, over 18,000 connections, 7 pump stations, 6 reservoirs, and 5 re -chlorination stations. Samples from 18 locations in the distribution system are taken weekly and are analyzed by Metro Vancouver. The results are sent to the Operations and Engineering Departments and to the FHA for review. In 2012, no samples tested positive for E. coli, and no samples exceeded the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation microbiological standard of 10 total coliforms per 100mL. b) Strategic Alignment: Financial Management Council has directed that the District provide high quality municipal services to our citizens and customers in a cost effective and efficient manner. The annual water quality monitoring program is intended to ensure that the water delivered by the District's utility is of high quality. Smart Managed Growth The Corporate Strategic Plan directs that municipal infrastructure be protected and managed through the preparation of appropriate plans to ensure maintenance of the system. A systematic water quality monitoring plan assists in ensuring that an effective water distribution system is managed and maintained. Intergovernmental Relations/Partnerships Council has directed that the District develop and maintain strong positive working relationships with the GVWD and other governmental agencies. The District currently benefits from good working relationships with the GVWD and FHA in the cooperative provision of quality drinking water. The annual monitoring program and report facilitates this effective relationship. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Maple Ridge water utility customers expect that the investment in the network be maintained to provide safe, reliable and high quality water. The annual reporting of water quality is a means to meet the accountability that customers expect. Ongoing improvements by Metro Vancouver will continue to improve regional water quality. d) Interdepartmental Implications: As part of the Public Works and Development Services Division, the Engineering and Operations Departments collaborate in the water utility's planning, management, operation, maintenance and water quality reporting to meet water quality objectives. e) Policy Implications: The reporting of water quality is consistent with the public policy approach of transparency and accountability as well as meeting the requirements of the FHA. CONCLUSIONS: The District monitored drinking water quality in 2012 in accordance with the Provincial mandate. Testing indicated that all samples met the standards detailed in the provincial Drinking Water Protection Regulation. The "Drinking Water Quality Report 2012" documents the water quality monitoring program and test results. The document was prepared in accordance with Fraser Health Authority requirements and will be available to the public. "Original signed by David Pollock" Prepared by: David Pollock, PEng. Municipal Engineer "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. General Manager: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer JD/mi Attachment: District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report. 2012 At 1 MAPLE RFDE British Columbia Deep Roy t5 5reater Heigh ES DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT 2012 June 11, 2013 DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT 2012 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 INTRODUCTION 2 3 BACKGROUND 3 3.1 SOURCE WATER 3 3.2 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 3 3.3 FACILITY MAINTENANCE 3 3.4 RE -CHLORINATION STATIONS 4 4 REGULATED DRINKING WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS 5 4.1 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING AND MONITORING 5 4.2 BACTERIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RESULTS 5 5 UNREGULATED DRINKING WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS 8 6 RESPONSE TO POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION 12 7 PUBLIC HEALTH MESSAGE FROM THE MEDICAL HEALTH OFFICER 12 8 CONCLUSION 12 APPENDIX A: METRO VANCOUVER COQUITLAM SOURCE WATER QUALITY APPENDIX B: SAMPLING STATION LOCATIONS APPENDIX C: OCCURRENCES OF FREE CHLORINE < 0.2 mg/L AND AVERAGE FREE CHLORINE RESIDUAL APPENDIX D: DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS AND pH APPENDIX E: METALS AND VINYL CHLORIDE APPENDIX F: METALS WITHOUT MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION GUIDELINES APPENDIX G: FREE CHLORINE AND TURBIDITY CHARTS APPENDIX H: WEEKLY SAMPLE LAB RESULTS APPENDIX 1: 2013 CAPITAL PROJECT LOCATIONS APPENDIX J: DRINKING WATER AND THOSE WITH WEAKENED IMMUNE SYSTEMS District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 1 Executive Summary The District of Maple Ridge (District) is a distributor of water that is supplied and treated by Metro Vancouver from its Coquitlam Lake source. In 2012, the Municipality supplied water to over 70,000 people. In accordance with the requirements of the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation, the District sends weekly drinking water samples from 18 locations to a laboratory for analysis. Test results are communicated to the District and the Fraser Health Authority every week and documented in this annual report. In 2012, the District met all regulatory requirements for drinking water quality set in the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation: • No samples tested positive for E. coli • For each 30 -day period, over 90% of samples had 0 total coliform per 100mL, and no sample had more than 10 total coliform per 100mL All water quality objectives suggested by Health Canada were also met: • Results for PH ranged from 7.0 to 7.1 pH units, within Health Canada guidelines. • Turbidity was low in 2012, except for a few isolated occurrences. The average turbidity values at all monitoring stations met the target recommended by Health Canada. • The running annual average total trihalomethane results ranged by location from 22 to 37 parts per billion (ppb), less than the Health Canada guidelines of 100 ppb. • The running annual average total haloacetic acid results ranged by location from 32 to 47 ppb, less than the Health Canada's suggested 80 ppb. 1 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 2 Introduction The District operates a Municipal Water Utility under the provisions of the provincial Local Government Act, the BC Drinking Water Protection Act, and the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation. These obligate the District to meet several requirements, including: • Operating the utility under permit by the Provincial Ministry of Health Services • Engaging in water quality monitoring The roles and responsibilities the Province, Fraser Health Authority and Metro Vancouver/District of Maple Ridge (Water System Owners) are shown in Figure 1. Ministry 'of 11k$lhy Living and Sport erritcs and 410 ,- W aking WatCr PrOteCtiirri# Act and Repiatioo Health Authority Adminisintion & Eriforcancrii Lrgisl.tiairkiRrguialion I Wager System Owners {Pmviman of ;aft i) Inl i n g Arp r + Nopiiraiin i F W'atrr Quaky Pcoblovs) Figure 1: Agency Responsibilities for Water Quality The District monitors drinking water quality regularly to ensure regulatory compliance. Moreover, the District checks a wide range of non-regulated water quality parameters to ensure residents are provided with water that is both safe to drink and aesthetically pleasing. Results for both regulated and unregulated parameters are presented in this report. 2 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 3 Background The District is supplied with water from the protected and undeveloped Metro Vancouver watersheds. Drinking water is conveyed to Maple Ridge through large diameter Metro Vancouver transmission mains and nearly 400km of municipal water distribution pipes. 3.1 Source Water Metro Vancouver supplies water to the District through a series of pipes linking Maple Ridge to the Coquitlam, Seymour and Capilano watersheds. While the Coquitlam watershed is the primary source of water for Maple Ridge, Metro Vancouver has the ability to convey water from the Seymour watershed to Maple Ridge in the event of a service disruption at the Coquitlam source. Metro Vancouver is currently constructing an ultra violet (UV) light disinfection plant at the Coquitlam watershed to enhance the disinfection capability of its water treatment facility. Construction of UV disinfection plant is scheduled for completion by 2014. 3.2 Distribution System The District distributes water to businesses, institutions and over 70,000 residents. Water distribution infrastructure includes approximately 380 km of water mains, over 18,000 service connections, 7 pump stations, and 6 reservoir sites. The Municipality also operates 5 re -chlorination stations to maintain residual chlorine in the distribution system. The distribution system is managed by a team of professionals within the Public Works and Development Services Division, under the leadership of the General Manager of Public Works and Development Services. The system is also regulated by Maple Ridge's Water Service Bylaw 6002- 2001. 3.3 Facility Maintenance Water quality is influenced by water system maintenance and improvement strategies that are implemented by the District's Operations and Engineering Departments. Unidirectional Flushing Unidirectional flushing is a method of cleaning sediment and material accumulation from water mains. Unidirectional flushing involves manipulating valves and discharging water through fire hydrants or blow off points. The discharged water carries sediment and other solids with it, thus cleaning the mains. The District cleaned 72km of mains (19% of the system) in 2012 using this method. In support of summer water conservation efforts, flushing activities for the purpose of cleaning water mains are performed only between October and May. Reservoirs Water reservoirs are cleaned to remove sediment and algae which may serve as nutrients to microorganisms. The District currently cleans its reservoirs on a 7 year cycle. 3 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Water Main Repairs and Improvements Water quantity, quality, and reliability can be improved through the repair and strategic replacement of water mains. Computer modeling and asset management analyses are carried out to identify future deficiencies in the system and plan improvements. The 2013 water system capital project locations are identified in Appendix I. 3.4 Re -Chlorination Stations Chlorine levels are continually monitored at 5 locations throughout the distribution system. Additional chlorine is automatically injected into the drinking water at these locations if detected chlorine levels are too low. The re -chlorination stations are inspected daily and adjusted as necessary. 4 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 4 Regulated Drinking Water Quality Parameters Metro Vancouver and the District are responsible for monitoring water quality in different parts of the drinking water system. Metro Vancouver is responsible for monitoring the quality of water leaving the treatment plants and within their transmission mains. The District is responsible for monitoring water quality in distribution pipes throughout Maple Ridge. The results of Metro Vancouver's treated water sampling results and comparisons with Health Canada Guidelines are presented in Appendix A. The quality of water distributed within the District is monitored in accordance with requirements set out in provincial regulations. This section describes the monitoring program and water quality results for 2012. 4.1 Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring Water quality is monitored for regulatory compliance on a weekly basis at the District's 18 sampling locations as well as at Metro Vancouver's 3 sampling locations within Maple Ridge. Sampling site locations and codes are illustrated on a map in Appendix B. Samples are taken weekly by District Operations Department staff and sent to the Metro Vancouver laboratory for analysis. Metro Vancouver staff analyze the samples and communicate the results to District and Fraser Health staff for review. Responses to unacceptable results would vary between flushing water mains to possibly issuing a boil water advisory, depending on the significance of the parameter of concern. The monitoring program provides a representative picture of drinking water quality within regional and municipal water mains. However, it does not provide a definitive picture of drinking water quality within buildings, where water quality can change significantly due to pipe materials, standing times, temperature, and other factors. It can be assumed that samples taken within buildings will be of different quality than those taken from municipal mains. The District is not responsible for water quality on private property. 4.2 Bacteriological Monitoring and Results The BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation requires the District to carry out routine sampling and testing for Escherichia coli and total coliform bacteria. These are considered "indicator organisms," because their presence or absence can provide a good indication of microbial water quality. Figures 2 and 3 show Metro Vancouver Laboratory technicians processing a water sample and testing it for the presence of coliform bacteria. Escherichia Coli Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a type of coliform bacteria present exclusively in the feces of humans and other animals. The existence of E. coli in a water sample indicates recent fecal contamination and the possible presence of intestinal disease -causing bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. The BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation standard for E. coli is none detectable per 100 ml. In 2012, no samples tested positive for E. coli. 5 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Figure 2: Metro Vancouver Laboratory technician processing water sample in preparation for coliform bacteria check Total Coliform Figure 3: Metro Vancouver Laboratory technician checking water sample for coliform bacteria The total coliform group of bacteria is composed of various types with similar characteristics. The natural niches for members of this group range from being fecal -specific, such as E. coli, to being widely distributed in the water, soil, and vegetation. The BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation standards for total coliform are described in Table 2. Table 2: BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation Standards for Total Coliform Occurrence Standard 1 sample in a 30 day period No detectable total coliform per 100mL More than 1 sample in a 30 day period At least 90% of samples have 0 total coliform per 100mL and no sample has more than 10 total coliform per 100mL For each 30 day period in 2012, over 90% of samples had 0 total coliform per 100mL, as per the regulations. No sample had more than 10 total coliform per 100mL. However, total coliforms were detected in 2 samples in 2012. The District's response to the detection of coliforms is to flush the water main at the test location. Total coliform data for each sample in 2012 is provided in Appendix H. Table 3 lists the annual number samples found to contain total coliform between 2006 and 2012. 6 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Table 3: Total Coliform Results by Year Year Number of Samples with Total Coliform 2012 2 2011 1 2010 3 2009 1 2008 0 2007 5 2006 0 Frequency of Monitoring Samples The monitoring frequency for the detection of E. coli and total coliforms is stipulated by the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation. Current requirements are identified in Table 4. With a total of 18 weekly sampling sites at various points in the District's water distribution system, the average number of monthly samples (72) exceeds with the stipulated value of 70 (based on a directly serviced population of approximately over 70,000); Metro Vancouver samples within the District provide an additional point of reference. As the District's population grows, additional sampling sites will be added. Table 4: Monitoring frequency for the detection of E. coli and total coliforms Population Served Target No. of Samples per Month Less than 5,000 4 5,000 to 90,000 1 per 1,000 of population More than 90,000 90 plus 1 per 10,000 of population in excess of 90,000 7 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 5 Unregulated Drinking Water Quality Parameters In monitoring unregulated drinking water quality parameters, the District exceeds the Water Quality Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the GVRD and Member Municipalities. This section reports on the District's non -regulatory monitoring. Heterotrophic Plate Count Samples are tested for the presence of heterotrophic bacteria to detect possible changes such as the bacterial quality of the finished water entering the distribution system, temperature, residence time (i.e., stagnation), the presence or absence of a disinfectant residual, and the availability of nutrients for growth. Health Canada does not suggest a maximum acceptable concentration for heterotrophs. Instead, it recommends that increases in heterotrophic plate count (HPC) concentrations above baseline levels be considered undesirable. Table 5 shows the annual number of samples with HPC's over 500 CFU/mL between 2006 and 2012. In response to HPC count's at or above this level, the District will re -test and flush water mains. HPC data for each sample taken in 2012 is provided in Appendix H. Table 5: HPC Results by Year Year Number of Samples with HPC > 500 CFU/mL 2012 0 2011 1 2010 1 2009 1 2008 4 2007 1 2006 7 Free Chlorine Health Canada's Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality recommends a minimum free chlorine residual of 0.2 mg/L to limit the growth of biofilm, provide an indication of distribution system water quality, and to guard against microbiological contamination. Table 6 and Appendix C show occurrences of free chlorine less than 0.2 mg/L as well as average free chlorine residual at all sampling stations in 2012. Detailed free chlorine residual data charted in Appendix G and tabulated in Appendix H indicates that several stations occasionally experienced free chlorine residuals of less than 0.2 mg/L. Sampling stations having occasional low chlorine concentrations had no indication of microbiological impairment. Variations in the concentration of free chlorine residual may be associated with various issues such as chemical reactions between the chlorine and organic and inorganic chemicals. Residual chlorine concentrations are also affected by water age, which fluctuates daily as local reservoirs fill and drain. 8 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Health Canada reports that "Free chlorine concentrations in most Canadian drinking water distribution systems range from 0.04 to 2.0 mg/L. "I- Disinfection 1 Disinfection Byproducts Disinfection byproducts such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) can form when the chlorine used to disinfect drinking water reacts with naturally occurring organic matter. Health Canada considers certain HAA's and THMS's to be probably carcinogenic to humans. In 2012, 16 samples were analyzed for trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids (See Appendix D). The running annual average THM results ranged by location from 22 to 37 parts per billion (ppb), less than the Health Canada guidelines of 100 ppb. The running annual average total HAA results ranged by location from 32 to 47 ppb, less than the Health Canada's suggested 80 ppb. Bromodichloromethane (a particular type of THM for which Health Canada publishes a standard) concentrations were all less than the Health Canada guideline of 16 ppb. Turbidity Turbidity, measured in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) is a measure of water clarity. There is no safe/unsafe level of turbidity, but Health Canada guidelines recommend that turbidity average around 1.0 NTU and a not exceed 5.0 NTU for more than 2 days in a 12 -month period. Turbidity levels from the Metro Vancouver source water of Capilano, Seymour and Coquitlam are reported on the Metro Vancouver web site on a daily basis. Turbidity was generally low in 2012 except for a few occurrences, with average turbidity values below 1 NTU at all sample stations (Table 6) and no stations having turbidity greater than 5 NTU for more than 2 days. Detailed Turbidity data for 2012 is charted in Appendix G and tabulated in Appendix H. Variations in turbidity for few stations as indicated in the table may be associated with turbidity in the source water or local system events such as flushing to clean water mains, high-volume flow rates for firefighting, or water main breaks. In the event that high turbidity is detected in a sample, the District will check system records for possible causes and re -test the water at the sample location. pH pH is a measure of the acid-base equilibrium of water. pH is of concern in a water distribution system because at low values water becomes corrosive while at high values chlorine disinfection is less efficient. Health Canada indicates that an acceptable pH range for drinking water is 6.5 - 8.5 pH units. 8 of the 941 distribution system samples were tested for pH. Test results ranged of 7.0 to 7.1 pH Units (See Appendix D). Metals The District tested samples at 3 monitoring sites for concentrations of various metals. Test results are shown in Appendix E, along with maximum concentration limits suggested by Health Canada and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). USEPA values are referenced only where Health Canada does not recommend a limit. As shown in Appendix E, all measured metal concentrations were below the limits recommended by Health Canada and the USEPA. Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA suggest drinking water quality guidelines for calcium, cobalt, magnesium, molybdenum, nickel or potassium. Additional information related to concentrations of these metals is provided in Appendix F. 1"Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality - Guideline Technical Document - Chlorine - (Health Canada, 2009) 9 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Table 6: Maple Ridge Sites - 2012 Average Physical Results by Site Site Total Average Average Occurrences of Free Chlorine Turbidity Free Chlorine mg/L NTU <0.2 mg/L GV -071 GV -072 GV -098 MPR -431 MPR -432 MPR -433 MPR -434 MPR -435 MPR -436 MPR -437 MPR -438 MPR -439 MPR -440 MPR -441 MPR -442 MPR -443 MPR -444 MPR -445 MPR -446 MPR -447 MPR -448 0.76 0.87 0.63 0.94 0.85 0.75 0.64 0.49 0.74 0.83 0.67 0.83 0.89 0.56 0.45 0.74 0.54 0.50 0.78 0.56 0.59 0.37 0.39 0.38 0.41 0.38 0.70 0.36 0.47 0.36 0.35 0.34 0.32 0.39 0.33 0.35 0.38 0.43 0.30 0.84 0.35 0.32 Temperature Health Canada sets an aesthetic objective of 15 degrees Celsius for drinking water. Water temperatures exceeding this objective can result in consumer complaints and the growth of nuisance organisms that could lead to unpleasant tastes and odors. Figure 4 shows that the average monthly drinking water temperature in Maple Ridge remained below the aesthetic objective of 15 degrees Celsius throughout the year. Detailed temperature information is provided in Appendix H. 10 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 14 12 •,3—„ 10 Tu u V) GJ ai , g OA N 0 °7 6 3 i+ CU L ai Q. t 4 a 1— Average Monthly Drinking Water Temprature Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Vinyl Chloride Figure 4: Average Monthly Drinking Water Temperature The concentration of vinyl chloride was tested in 6 samples during 2012. As indicated in Appendix E, all results were non-detectable (less than 0.5 pg/L), less than the Health Canada Guideline of 2 pg/L. 11 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 6 Response to Potential Contamination In the event that contaminants are detected in the water distribution system, a series of protocols would be carried out to communicate the event to District and Fraser Health Authority staff. The District and Fraser Health would then work together to confirm the incident, determine the nature of the risk to public health and issue public notices as required. Depending on the level of risk, a water quality advisory, boil water notice, or do -not -use water notice could be issued. Public notices would be communicated through various media. The District's contamination response plan is embedded in emergency planning documents. 7 Public Health Message from the Medical Health Officer Fraser Health's Medical Health Officer has requested that a fact sheet entitled "Drinking Water and Those with Weakened Immune Systems" be included in this report. The fact sheet is presented in Appendix J. Additionally, the Medical Health Officer has requested that the following message be included in this report: Anytime the water in a particular faucet has not been used for six hours or longer, "flush" your cold -water pipes by running the water until you notice a change in temperature. (This could take as little as five to thirty seconds if there has been recent heavy water use such as showering or toilet flushing. Otherwise, it could take two minutes or longer.) The more time water has been sitting in your home's pipes, the more lead it may contain. Use only water from the cold -tap for drinking, cooking, and especially making baby formula. Hot water is likely to contain higher levels of lead. The two actions recommended above are very important to the health of your family. They will probably be effective in reducing lead levels because most of the lead in household water usually comes from the plumbing in your house, not from the local water supply. 8 CONCLUSION The District monitored drinking water quality in 2012 in accordance with provincial regulations. 941 drinking water samples were obtained from the municipal water distribution system at 18 sites throughout the District. Metro Vancouver Laboratory testing indicated that all samples met standards detailed in the provincial Drinking Water Protection Regulation. The samples also met Health Canada's Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality. 12 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Appendix A: Metro Vancouver Coquitlam Source Water Quality 13 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 PhY5LC�1 and ChcaIcal A.11.1Lv5LI of litra1IN Supply Greater Vancouver Watcr District 2012 - courruitlarm Water S i-5iaa 71.:r1rr,<....11Fric ■ MLR ir ifdavari 41.drmq Mgr, rim nap 41.144 wap Miriam my Ema+zF- rlr r.rgdr..piIEL rrwr a. l.rl r>ky,r 3,0431s1 .r.r,•.,.Irr'' imp drr {., sh,rar .¢ treTeif T1 rlreoakum/ rsar iraarra. Vsamorwra PM rig imispE4 aaMraaat 1..mr trAmedo* sir ir Ddu mural �L_�.•. iaralarrr enllrvirla. fi.riim arrniij.a'{=ai6r,JM 11•ia Drain Tart - Soo 1Litho • ANA ad Film Cord. NEL br 1. Axe NJ/ NEW.. vice c ETA :am 4haoleak adirpojitilemii7 ihwaria" a 14~0' ild'alda# ,470P; rim Aquasantfira7+rflp SRI;. li itrtinfel INF Id imam limr. 2E11 L eerie e r •jz =mem La =WPM IL'IAINSI? OK IN L.4 7.6 1743 1e Ila Ma) Mi. -MAMA 0.416 941H 1.444-0917 11i! .1:M1114 Mai 1} ea 049 00"Ail MI '4.1 -- {1r ALIIIM*J 1-11g W144 •4 3 .413 1113 n 1 644111 h..r ?w4i 011.& Mi UM - JL4 41 a i4 1..14h INA 17 14 14'24 9 74N 114,41 t4d blit) •49I •C.GI %CI 5 114. •i 01 •01 a. c.el 1:144. &mob fart} ICEI lad W} Yeas► 4 01 r70 01 t gap. 603 41 C. 5 ,= t••l ML) 1.4Or Dwia441 1:1J4 0 if 0 7$-0 NI PPM 1u 11 11-1 1 EOM ['Mc AL1 TWA 1 ! 1.41 14-1 1 4w La& •dpaaO•w CUMIN 1) OM 4 01-0 14 o 14 01..66% . • 04 lC IA43 4 a.'Ai imalL5 a.a.lm TiII 1 .ice I..M► *CI f) • o -.0 IJ a 3* OA= AW OM L7 1 .'14 MEN lair Cahn 1ro,i71.14 1:41 am1 Ler 1 •eti 4 311 4 24 10-15 mir ri 1.1411 0 041 Io -04 o L. G54•1 e_. TdrL L] Aram* Ir.11r ALW .IIrL2 A.02 11 01 Raoul. Co;524 Irsla vim lsS ..a OS G 1 .5 Hamo% CKCO, 2,45 2 dT 113-1i# rim u {is}ij b' t i {rreL1 34 li L4•44 EiN4 um 1191 {111114 34 73 311.4 33 .1 •!4V aaIMMc 1441h Lad TraL4ligT 43 S c113 9 L4 4.It 4_II 41.04[1. Gr 13.231 kbmaa Taal {ac:.j wmosrx i 14 1.4 II 11,11 ....s 5,Japia4 Tical (m11 3.4 31 21.4.1 4 .c50 swim Wit Nit roxy nisi Owl) --OM 1b 9 L 4 r240t11 111MI Oa4d '-5;1 4-1 NM 7 hiepN - i.b. N IN1171 .4.1112 X04 .0 axle M 0.10 111 6 (4.1 13 4 11 %TOM • 14, ■ NI (wt.) Irma Wiwi -MON lc 1114I4 'A 1 %el '41 41 0 L 4 Yam a pif MIME 43 T> 4 4.1.1 1 051;45 M (11a'L) # i •:5 11111r Rboisli 4s rad WI) •: 5 S] mad Pilaunso7a.a1{A7.3 •It 411 1111.11 .s 8141031 Tall'jL] ti T2 Lt#k Pe Prr+44• Tani T1.1tt LI :1 1441 0 s 304 44.116WC lin. Tool Ford Ll 1 i6 11,10' ma. or Raga TOW Valla u •,aril S 1 441 rate 14-149mim Tag • 1 •i, 5 43 15 1e iii. SikeialL ilOF 04-0,1 11 * 4 1 1.11 ®r 'aka Tea] (Ail) 45 •OS 045 osr SliasTag ail) 13 15 L.7-5.3 1 266 arc 9111agoMIT.4 11.1.1.1.1 0.7 417 41.6.1 9 r sac. i ail O. * a< 7FC a 117114.75 1.34san.TeaI 0 435 4 • D9 I OWL) 1]47541/i14 6A$ 1449 0109.341947 MA II10-11 App. r4144:aj Aon a 8 ' .3...3114-131317 maa z Reg ' y c3 '3 4 1 e 5694 .wrillMe 71.:r1rr,<....11Fric ■ MLR ir ifdavari 41.drmq Mgr, rim nap 41.144 wap Miriam my Ema+zF- rlr r.rgdr..piIEL rrwr a. l.rl r>ky,r 3,0431s1 .r.r,•.,.Irr'' imp drr {., sh,rar .¢ treTeif T1 rlreoakum/ rsar iraarra. Vsamorwra PM rig imispE4 aaMraaat 1..mr trAmedo* sir ir Ddu mural �L_�.•. iaralarrr enllrvirla. fi.riim arrniij.a'{=ai6r,JM 11•ia Drain Tart - Soo 1Litho • ANA ad Film Cord. NEL br 1. Axe NJ/ NEW.. vice c ETA :am 4haoleak adirpojitilemii7 ihwaria" a 14~0' ild'alda# ,470P; rim Aquasantfira7+rflp SRI;. District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Appendix B: Sampling Station Locations 15 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Ax. 432 r+ 442 • 071 • 440 ArL SAW 440 5 WATER SAMPLE LOCATIONS 5 434'i •435 098 E I I l 125 AYE. 5 4124 � 1 445 1 446 N it4975. brFommgrav-10.76 1.4 Opre ..W... 5102 fYE. 105 AIEMJE 96 AVL,M/E • )f SOLE: N.T.S. SAMPLING LOCATIONS CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 2013 FILE/DWG No SAMPLING LOCAT1ONS 16 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Appendix C: Occurrences of Free Chlorine < 0.2 mg/L And Average Free Chlorine Residual 17 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 1" .123 AVENUE .,L 0443 LOCATIONS WHERE FREE CHLORINE CONCENTRATION FELL BELOW 0.2 mg/I N SCALE: N.T.S. OCCURRENCES OF FREE CHLORINE <0.2 mg/1 4 4 MAPLE R CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 2013 FILE/DWG No CHLORINE CONC-2012 18 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 446 0olaer 1:110.1 Acio 442;j 'lint Moo -10 111dor 01.11rms. awoari 2012 • 1_%D mq/L a 0.00-4.99 'n 't CL5f—a1a ,nGLA oo20-0.4g fn9lt OL10-0-18 mQA • OLDO—G.OB mgit SCALE: N,T.S- AVERAGE FREE CHLORINE 2012 MAPLE RICCE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: JUNE 2013 FILE/DWG No AVG -CHLORINE 2012 19 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Appendix D: Disinfection By -Products and pH 20 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Disinfection by-products & pH Sample Site Sample Location Date Sampled THM (ppb) HAA(ppb) PH Units Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Chlorodibromomethane E 0 0 `0 0 Total Trihalomethanes Running Average (Last 4 Quarters) Dibromoacetic Acid Dichloroacetic Acid Monobromoacetic Acid Monochloroacetic Acid Trichloroacetic Acid Total Haloacetic Acid Running Average (Last 4 Quarters) 16 100 80 6.5-8.5 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 10/05/2011 <1 <1 <1 20 20.3 <0.5 13 <1 4 20 36.4 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 13/09/2011 <1 <1 <1 21 20.8 <0.5 8 <1 11 9 27.1 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 15/11/2011 <1 <1 <1 37 37.2 <0.5 16 <1 12 25 53.4 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 28/02/2012 <1 <1 <1 24 24 P 26 <0.5 16 <1 5 16 38 P' 39 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 15/05/2012 <1 <1 <1 24 24 F 26 <0.5 16 <1 19 14 49 P' 42 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 28/08/2012 <1 <1 <1 24 24 . 27 <0.5 12 <1 2 12 26 P 42 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 27/11/2012 <1 <1 <1 33 33 ' 26 <0.5 11 <1 <2 14 24 '' 34 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 10/05/2011 <1 <1 <1 29 29 <0.5 15 <1 4 27 46.5 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 13/09/2011 <1 <1 <1 24 24.2 <0.5 10 <1 10 8 27.7 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 15/11/2011 <1 <1 <1 39 38.6 <0.5 18 <1 10 25 53.2 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 28/02/2012 <1 <1 <1 25 25 29 <0.5 21 <1 6 22 50 44 7.0 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 08/05/2012 <1 <1 <1 35 35 7 31 <0.5 17 <1 4 26 46 44 7.1 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 28/08/2012 <1 <1 <1 23 23 ' 30 <0.5 11 <1 <2 12 23 43 7.1 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 27/11/2012 <1 <1 <1 36 36 ' 30 <0.5 11 <1 2 16 29 37 7.1 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 10/05/2011 <1 <1 <1 33 33.4 <0.5 20 <1 5 67 92.4 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 13/09/2011 <1 <1 <1 30 30.1 <0.5 <1 <1 8 <0.5 8.5 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 15/11/2011 <1 <1 <1 36 36.1 <0.5 10 <1 2 16 28.2 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 28/02/2012 <1 <1 <1 35 35 . 34 <0.5 15 <1 3 25 43 ! 43 7.0 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 08/05/2012 <1 <1 <1 39 39 35 <0.5 21 <1 5 23 49 32 7.1 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 28/08/2012 <1 <1 <1 27 27 34 <0.5 8 <1 <2 18 26 37 7.1 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 27/11/2012 <1 <1 <1 45 45 P 37 <0.5 23 <1 5 41 69 47 7.1 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 10/05/2011 <1 <1 <1 22 21.5 <0.5 17 <1 18 16 51 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 13/09/2011 <1 <1 <1 19 19.4 <0.5 <1 <1 10 <0.5 10.5 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 15/11/2011 <1 <1 <1 33 33.4 <0.5 25 <1 27 16 68 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 28/02/2012 <1 <1 <1 22 22 24 <0.5 20 <1 5 17 41 P' 43 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 08/05/2012 <1 <1 <1 19 19 24 <0.5 13 <1 14 10 36 P' 39 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 28/08/2012 <1 <1 <1 22 22 24 <0.5 11 <1 2 7 20 r 41 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 27/11/2012 <1 <1 <1 26 26 22 <0.5 12 <1 2 14 29 P 32 21 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Appendix E: Metals and Vinyl Chloride 22 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Metal Concentration Sample Name Sample Location Sampled Date Aluminium Total (Ng/L) Antimony Total (Ng/L) Arsenic Total (pg/L) Barium Total (pg/L) Boron Total (Ng/L) Cadmium Total (Ng/L) Calcium Total (pg/L) Chromium Total (pg/L) Cobalt Total (Ng/L) Copper Total (pg/L) Iron Total (Ng/L) Lead Total (Ng/L) Magnesium Total (Ng/L) Manganese Total (Ng/L) Mercury Total (pg/L) Molybdenum Total (pg/L) Nickel Total (Ng/L) Potassium Total (pg/L) Selenium Total (Ng/L) Silver Total (Ng/L) Sodium Total (pg/L) Zinc Total (Ng/L) Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality a) 0 c 6 10 1000 5000 5 a) 0 c 50 c 0 c 1000 300 10 c 0 c 50 1 c 0 c c 0 c c 0 c 10 a) 0 c 200,000 5000 USEPA National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations 50-200 c 0 c c 0 c c 0 c c 0 c C 0 c C 0 c 100 Reason Guideline Established - Health (H) or Aesthetic (A) A HHH HH H A AH AH HA A A MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 24 -Apr -12 81 <0.5 <0.5 2.4 <10 <0.2 956 0.1 <0.5 29.3 71 <0.5 119 3.6 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 125 <0.5 <0.5 5860 <3 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 30 -Oct -12 124 <0.5 <0.5 3 <10 <0.2 946 0.12 <0.5 14.4 67 <0.5 115 3.2 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 117 <0.5 <0.5 5570 <3 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 24 -Apr -12 84 <0.5 <0.5 2.4 <10 <0.2 1020 0.07 <0.5 14.2 77 <0.5 119 3 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 127 <0.5 <0.5 5730 <3 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 30 -Oct -12 118 <0.5 <0.5 2.9 <10 <0.2 1110 0.07 <0.5 20.8 65 <0.5 111 1.5 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 130 <0.5 <0.5 5640 <3 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 24 -Apr -12 82 <0.5 <0.5 3.5 <10 <0.2 1510 0.08 <0.5 3.5 89 <0.5 114 2 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 134 <0.5 <0.5 8370 3.4 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 30 -Oct -12 111 <0.5 <0.5 4.2 <10 <0.2 1640 0.17 <0.5 4.1 79 <0.5 102 3.7 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 143 <0.5 <0.5 7960 3.6 23 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Vinyl Chloride Concentrations Sample Name Sample Location Sampled Date Vinyl Chloride Maximum Acceptable Concentration, as per health Canada 2 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 24 -Apr -12 <0.50 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 30 -Oct -12 <0.50 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 24 -Apr -12 <0.50 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 30 -Oct -12 <0.50 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 24 -Apr -12 <0.50 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 30 -Oct -12 <0.50 24 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Appendix F: Metals without Maximum Concentration Guidelines Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA suggest maximum concentration guidelines for calcium, cobalt, magnesium, molybdenum, nickel or potassium in drinking water. Additional information related to these metals is provided below. Calcium Health Canada reports "there is no evidence of adverse health effects specifically attributable to calcium in drinking water. Insufficient data are available to set a specific value for an aesthetic objective for calcium in drinking water. A guideline for calcium has therefore not been specified....Measurements of water samples collected from 71 municipalities across Canada showed that the mean calcium concentrations were...21,400 (1,100 to 112,800) pg/L for distributed water."1 Cobalt Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for cobalt. However, as a point of reference one might consider that the BC Ministry of Environment recommends that the maximum concentration of total cobalt not exceed 110 pg/L to "protect aquatic life in the freshwater environment from acute effects of cobalt."2 Magnesium Health Canada reports "there is no evidence of adverse health effects specifically attributable to magnesium in drinking water. A guideline for magnesium has therefore not been specified. Two national surveys of drinking water supplies, encompassing 115 municipalities across Canada, were conducted in 1976 and 1977; magnesium concentrations in distributed water ranged from 200 to 59,500 pg/L."3 Molybdenum Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for Molybdenum. However, as a point of reference one might consider that The BC Ministry of Environment recommends a maximum of 50 pg/L for various water uses such as irrigation and drinking water for livestock.4 Nickel Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for nickel. However, as a point of reference one might consider that the BC Ministry of Environment recommends a maximum concentration of 8.3 pg/L nickel for marine aquatic life.5 1 Guidelines For Canadian Drinking Water Quality - Supporting Documents - Calcium, Health Canada (1978, updated 1987) 2 Ambient Water Quality Guidelines for Cobalt Overview Report, BC Ministry of Environment (2004) 3 Guidelines For Canadian Drinking Water Quality - Supporting Documents - Magnesium, Health Canada (1978, updated 1987) 4 Water Quality Criteria for Molybdenum Overview Report, BC Ministry of Environment (1986) 25 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Potassium Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for potassium. However, as a point of reference one might consider that the BC Ministry of environment recommends a maximum concentration of 373,000 pg/L potassium for freshwater aquatic life.6 5 A Compendium of Working Water Quality Guidelines for British Columbia, BC Ministry of Environment (2008) 6 A Compendium of Working Water Quality Guidelines for British Columbia, BC Ministry of Environment (2008) 26 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Appendix G: Free Chlorine and Turbidity Charts 27 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 2 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -431 —Free Chlorine 1.8 —Turbidity `a 1.6 Target Chlorine Concentration 1.4 Y £ 1.2 0 73, s 1 Q G1 Z • 0.8 c 0.6 s ,°1, 0.4 - 0.2 E L 0 A A A Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1.4 - c z. 1.2 Y v La '- Q1 c 0.8 a z • 0.6 c s 0.4 2 0.2 00 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -432 —a—Free Chlorine —E—Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration A 0 1 1 T Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 28 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 2.5 - 2 1.5 0.5 1.4 ln Y E >. 1.2 1 1 0 Y 0.8 G1 Q G1 z 0.6 a s 0.4 a cu 0.2 o\a 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -433 Second Highest Turbidity was 3.9 NTU on April 17, 2012 1 Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration Highest Turbidity was 10 NTU on Nov. 6, 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -434 --}—Free Chlorine --Turbidity — Target Chlorine Concentration 0 1 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 29 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 1.8 1.6 1.4 y - 1.2 a E 0 a z 0.8 • 0.6 0 • 0.4 LL 0.2 00 E 0 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -435 Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration Highest Turbidity was 7.2 NTU on March 20, 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2.5 =0 ▪ 2 0 .17Y £ 1.5 0 0 a Z 1 0 u 2u) 0.5 LL J Op E 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -436 -Free Chlorine —Turbidity —Target Chlorine Concentration 0 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 30 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1.4 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -437 — Free Chlorine —Turbidity — Target Chlorine Concentration Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -438 —E—Free Chlorine —E—Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 31 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 1.6 In Y 1.4 1.2 V a 1 0.8 z _ 0.6 Q v 0.4 LL z 0.2 00 G 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -439 Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration 0 Jan 1.6 1.4 T 1 1.2 a 1 O G1 0.8 G1 z N 0.6 Q u 0.4 LL 0.2 bCil 0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -440 Free Chlorine Turbidity - Target Chlorine Concentration 1 T li I I I I I I I I I I I an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 32 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 1.6 1.4 T Y 1 1.2 a 1 G1 0.8 G1 z = 0.6 .Q u 0.4 .74 LL 0.2 bCil 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -441 Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1.6 1.2 W 1 G O 0.8 a z aa) 0.6 c Q v 0.4 LL 0.2 00 G 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -442 Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration 0 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 33 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 1.6 1.4 T 1 1.2 a 1 Tu 0.8 a z a • 0.6 Q u 0.4 a a LL ▪ 0.2 bA E 0 1.4 4- z. 1.2 v 1 1 0.8 .) a z 0.6 _ s • 0.4 0.2 no 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -443 Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration 1 I 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -444 Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration Highest Turbidity was 5.5 NTU on Oct. 9, 2012 0 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 34 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 1.2 • 1 - 0.8 Y E O G1 0.6 a z cu 0.4 0 u a Lc) LL 0.2 ea 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -445 —a—Free Chlorine —E—Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration Highest Turbidity was 2.1 NTU on Nov. 6, 2012 1.4 - Y • 1.2 0.8 a a z 0.6 a c s • 0.4 0.2 00 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -446 Highest Turbidity was 26 NTU on March 7(117_ Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 35 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 - Y 1.4 1.2 F 1 0.8 a z 0.6 c s 0.4 a 0.2 00 E 0 1.4 1.2 i- 1 0.8 .) a z 0.6 a c s 0.4 v 0.2 00 £ 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -447 -- Free Chlorine —a—Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -448 -Free Chlorine —Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 36 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 1.8 1.6 T 1.4 - 1.2 Y E O 1 c 0 Q z 0.8 cu 0 0.6 a 0.4 a LL \ 0.2 — 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site GV -071 Free Chlorine - Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration E L Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2.5 _ =a ▪ 2 0 Y £ 1.5 0 a 0 a Z \ 1 0 u 2u) 0.5 LL J Op E 0 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site GV -072 Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1 1 1 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 37 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 2 'E 1.8 T 1.6 1- 1.4 0 Y £ 1.2 O G1 s 1 0 G1 Z -N 0.8 c c 0.6 s u a°1, 0.4 LL 0.2 — 2012 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site GV -098 Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration C� C I 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 38 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Appendix H: Weekly Sample Lab Results 39 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU GV -071 Haney 5 -Jan -12 0.52 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV -071 Haney 9 -Jan -12 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV -071 Haney 12 -Jan -12 0.77 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -071 Haney 16 -Jan -12 0.58 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV -071 Haney 19 -Jan -12 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -071 Haney 23 -Jan -12 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.39 GV -071 Haney 26 -Jan -12 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV -071 Haney 30 -Jan -12 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -071 Haney 2 -Feb -12 1 <1 <2 <1 0.4 GV -071 Haney 8 -Feb -12 0.89 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -071 Haney 9 -Feb -12 1 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV -071 Haney 13 -Feb -12 0.94 <1 2 <1 0.3 GV -071 Haney 16 -Feb -12 0.93 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -071 Haney 20 -Feb -12 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.39 GV -071 Haney 23 -Feb -12 0.65 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV -071 Haney 27 -Feb -12 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV -071 Haney 1 -Mar -12 0.63 <1 <2 <1 0.24 GV -071 Haney 5 -Mar -12 0.72 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV -071 Haney 8 -Mar -12 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV -071 Haney 9 -Mar -12 0.72 <1 2 <1 0.35 GV -071 Haney 12 -Mar -12 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV -071 Haney 15 -Mar -12 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -071 Haney 19 -Mar -12 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV -071 Haney 22 -Mar -12 0.61 <1 2 <1 0.31 GV -071 Haney 26 -Mar -12 0.74 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV -071 Haney 29 -Mar -12 0.86 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV -071 Haney 5 -Apr -12 0.65 <1 2 <1 0.31 GV -071 Haney 10 -Apr -12 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV -071 Haney 12 -Apr -12 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -071 Haney 16 -Apr -12 0.8 <1 <2 <1 0.15 GV -071 Haney 19 -Apr -12 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -071 Haney 23 -Apr -12 0.75 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -071 Haney 26 -Apr -12 0.89 <1 2 <1 0.32 GV -071 Haney 30 -Apr -12 0.79 <1 4 <1 0.35 GV -071 Haney 3 -May -12 0.6 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV -071 Haney 10 -May -12 0.93 <1 <2 <1 0.38 GV -071 Haney 15 -May -12 0.58 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV -071 Haney 17 -May -12 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.27 40 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU GV -071 Haney 24 -May -12 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.51 GV -071 Haney 28 -May -12 0.91 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV -071 Haney 31 -May -12 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV -071 Haney 4 -Jun -12 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.41 GV -071 Haney 7 -Jun -12 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.55 GV -071 Haney 8 -Jun -12 0.77 <1 4 <1 0.29 GV -071 Haney 11 -Jun -12 0.86 <1 <2 <1 0.4 GV -071 Haney 14 -Jun -12 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -071 Haney 18 -Jun -12 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV -071 Haney 21 -Jun -12 0.75 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV -071 Haney 25 -Jun -12 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV -071 Haney 28 -Jun -12 0.88 <1 2 <1 0.3 GV -071 Haney 5 -Jul -12 0.49 <1 2 <1 0.28 GV -071 Haney 12 -Jul -12 0.76 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV -071 Haney 19 -Jul -12 0.8 <1 8 <1 0.21 GV -071 Haney 26 -Jul -12 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV -071 Haney 3 -Aug -12 0.53 <1 24 <1 0.36 GV -071 Haney 10 -Aug -12 0.75 <1 2 <1 0.27 GV -071 Haney 13 -Aug -12 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.22 GV -071 Haney 16 -Aug -12 0.93 <1 2 <1 0.3 GV -071 Haney 20 -Aug -12 0.69 <1 2 <1 0.25 GV -071 Haney 27 -Aug -12 0.62 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -071 Haney 31 -Aug -12 0.94 <1 2 <1 0.26 GV -071 Haney 4 -Sep -12 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -071 Haney 10 -Sep -12 0.6 <1 <2 <1 0.25 GV -071 Haney 13 -Sep -12 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.25 GV -071 Haney 17 -Sep -12 0.75 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV -071 Haney 18 -Sep -12 0.92 <1 <2 <1 0.25 GV -071 Haney 18 -Sep -12 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -071 Haney 20 -Sep -12 0.77 <1 8 <1 0.22 GV -071 Haney 24 -Sep -12 0.47 <1 <2 <1 0.2 GV -071 Haney 27 -Sep -12 0.69 <1 6 <1 0.11 GV -071 Haney 1 -Oct -12 0.52 <1 <2 <1 0.11 GV -071 Haney 4 -Oct -12 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.45 GV -071 Haney 5 -Oct -12 0.71 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV -071 Haney 11 -Oct -12 0.57 <1 <2 <1 0.44 GV -071 Haney 18 -Oct -12 0.86 <1 <2 <1 1.7 GV -071 Haney 22 -Oct -12 0.9 <1 <2 <1 1.6 41 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU GV -071 Haney 25 -Oct -12 0.84 <1 <2 <1 1.2 GV -071 Haney 29 -Oct -12 1 <1 <2 <1 0.93 GV -071 Haney 1 -Nov -12 0.93 <1 <2 <1 0.73 GV -071 Haney 5 -Nov -12 0.56 <1 <2 <1 0.69 GV -071 Haney 14 -Nov -12 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.56 GV -071 Haney 15 -Nov -12 1.1 <1 <2 <1 0.52 GV -071 Haney 22 -Nov -12 0.67 <1 <2 <1 0.48 GV -071 Haney 28 -Nov -12 0.54 <1 <2 <1 0.44 GV -071 Haney 29 -Nov -12 0.78 <1 2 <1 0.47 GV -071 Haney 30 -Nov -12 0.63 <1 <2 <1 0.39 GV -071 Haney 4 -Dec -12 0.75 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -071 Haney 6 -Dec -12 0.77 <1 <2 <1 0.25 GV -071 Haney 11 -Dec -12 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV -071 Haney 13 -Dec -12 0.8 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV -071 Haney 20 -Dec -12 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.23 GV -071 Haney 24 -Dec -12 0.7 <1 NA <1 0.2 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 3 -Jan -12 0.53 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 5 -Jan -12 0.48 <1 <2 <1 0.54 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 9 -Jan -12 0.77 <1 <2 <1 0.37 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 12 -Jan -12 1 <1 2 <1 0.32 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 16 -Jan -12 0.95 <1 <2 <1 0.39 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 19 -Jan -12 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 23 -Jan -12 0.97 <1 2 <1 0.43 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 26 -Jan -12 1.2 <1 <2 <1 0.41 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 30 -Jan -12 0.8 <1 <2 <1 0.4 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 7 -Feb -12 0.94 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 9 -Feb -12 0.97 <1 2 <1 0.3 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 14 -Feb -12 0.94 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 16 -Feb -12 0.99 <1 2 <1 0.27 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 21 -Feb -12 0.53 <1 <2 <1 0.35 42 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 23 -Feb -12 0.95 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 28 -Feb -12 0.82 <1 2 <1 0.28 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 29 -Feb -12 0.92 <1 2 <1 0.29 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 6 -Mar -12 0.94 <1 <2 <1 0.44 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 9 -Mar -12 0.89 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 13 -Mar -12 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.38 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 16 -Mar -12 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 20 -Mar -12 0.84 <1 2 <1 0.35 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 22 -Mar -12 1 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 27 -Mar -12 1 <1 <2 <1 0.37 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 5 -Apr -12 1.1 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 11 -Apr -12 0.94 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 13 -Apr -12 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 17 -Apr -12 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 19 -Apr -12 1 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 24 -Apr -12 0.94 <1 4 <1 0.28 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 26 -Apr -12 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 27 -Apr -12 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 1 -May -12 0.8 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 3 -May -12 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 4 -May -12 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 10 -May -12 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.39 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 14 -May -12 0.89 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 15 -May -12 0.98 <1 <2 <1 0.4 43 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 17 -May -12 0.99 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 24 -May -12 0.59 <1 <2 <1 0.38 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 29 -May -12 0.97 <1 <2 <1 0.38 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 5 -Jun -12 0.89 <1 <2 <1 0.43 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 7 -Jun -12 0.74 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 8 -Jun -12 0.82 <1 2 <1 0.29 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 12 -Jun -12 0.94 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 19 -Jun -12 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.24 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 21 -Jun -12 1 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 26 -Jun -12 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 28 -Jun -12 1.1 <1 2 <1 0.28 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 5 -Jul -12 0.96 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 12 -Jul -12 0.9 <1 6 <1 0.58 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 19 -Jul -12 0.63 <1 4 <1 0.22 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 26 -Jul -12 0.62 <1 6 <1 0.28 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 3 -Aug -12 0.64 <1 4 <1 0.4 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 10 -Aug -12 0.61 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 15 -Aug -12 0.98 <1 28 <1 0.34 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 16 -Aug -12 0.96 <1 2 <1 0.27 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 22 -Aug -12 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 23 -Aug -12 0.92 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 27 -Aug -12 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 29 -Aug -12 0.91 <1 <2 <1 0.41 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 31 -Aug -12 0.94 <1 <2 <1 0.3 44 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 4 -Sep -12 0.94 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 6 -Sep -12 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.25 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 10 -Sep -12 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 11 -Sep -12 0.92 <1 2 <1 0.21 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 18 -Sep -12 0.89 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 24 -Sep -12 0.55 <1 6 <1 0.23 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 26 -Sep -12 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.16 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 2 -Oct -12 0.71 <1 <2 <1 0.54 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 4 -Oct -12 1 <1 <2 <1 0.51 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 11 -Oct -12 0.99 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 18 -Oct -12 1.2 <1 <2 <1 2 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 24 -Oct -12 1 <1 <2 <1 1.3 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 25 -Oct -12 1.1 <1 2 <1 1.2 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 30 -Oct -12 0.96 <1 <2 <1 0.83 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 1 -Nov -12 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.7 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 6 -Nov -12 1 <1 6 <1 0.8 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 14 -Nov -12 1.1 <1 <2 <1 0.61 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 15 -Nov -12 0.86 <1 <2 <1 0.49 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 20 -Nov -12 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.47 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 27 -Nov -12 0.95 <1 2 <1 0.46 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 29 -Nov -12 0.62 <1 <2 <1 0.4 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 4 -Dec -12 0.75 <1 <2 <1 0.37 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 6 -Dec -12 0.84 <1 66 <1 0.3 45 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 11 -Dec -12 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 13 -Dec -12 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.47 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 19 -Dec -12 1.1 <1 <2 <1 0.22 GV -072 Maple Ridge Pump Station 24 -Dec -12 0.94 <1 NA <1 0.22 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 5 -Jan -12 0.53 <1 <2 <1 0.41 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 9 -Jan -12 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.38 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 12 -Jan -12 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 16 -Jan -12 0.56 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 19 -Jan -12 0.5 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 23 -Jan -12 0.9 <1 2 <1 0.51 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 26 -Jan -12 0.95 <1 <2 <1 0.36 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 30 -Jan -12 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 2 -Feb -12 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.4 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 8 -Feb -12 0.64 <1 6 <1 0.43 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 9 -Feb -12 0.57 <1 2 <1 0.35 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 13 -Feb -12 0.53 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 16 -Feb -12 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 20 -Feb -12 0.63 <1 <2 <1 0.41 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 23 -Feb -12 0.62 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 27 -Feb -12 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.38 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 1 -Mar -12 0.6 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 8 -Mar -12 0.55 <1 4 <1 0.31 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 9 -Mar -12 0.52 <1 2 <1 0.34 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 12 -Mar -12 0.74 <1 <2 <1 0.39 46 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 15 -Mar -12 0.75 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 19 -Mar -12 0.65 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 22 -Mar -12 0.56 <1 <2 <1 0.46 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 26 -Mar -12 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.37 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 29 -Mar -12 0.55 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 5 -Apr -12 0.32 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 10 -Apr -12 0.53 <1 2 <1 0.28 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 12 -Apr -12 0.54 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 16 -Apr -12 0.5 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 19 -Apr -12 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.24 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 23 -Apr -12 0.66 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 26 -Apr -12 0.6 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 30 -Apr -12 0.85 <1 2 <1 0.36 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 3 -May -12 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.37 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 10 -May -12 0.65 <1 <2 <1 0.41 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 15 -May -12 0.53 <1 <2 <1 0.47 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 17 -May -12 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 24 -May -12 0.34 <1 2 <1 0.33 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 28 -May -12 0.8 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 31 -May -12 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 4 -Jun -12 0.8 <1 <2 <1 0.31 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 7 -Jun -12 0.55 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 8 -Jun -12 0.52 <1 <2 <1 0.29 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 11 -Jun -12 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.35 47 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 14 -Jun -12 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.43 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 18 -Jun -12 0.72 <1 <2 <1 0.43 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 21 -Jun -12 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 25 -Jun -12 0.77 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 28 -Jun -12 0.5 <1 <2 <1 0.26 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 5 -Jul -12 0.33 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 12 -Jul -12 0.28 <1 2 <1 0.25 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 19 -Jul -12 0.38 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 26 -Jul -12 0.66 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 3 -Aug -12 0.6 <1 <2 <1 0.39 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 10 -Aug -12 0.51 <1 2 <1 0.27 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 13 -Aug -12 0.47 <1 4 <1 0.25 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 16 -Aug -12 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.32 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 20 -Aug -12 0.5 <1 14 <1 0.44 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 23 -Aug -12 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.27 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 27 -Aug -12 0.49 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 31 -Aug -12 0.86 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 4 -Sep -12 0.54 <1 <2 <1 0.33 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 10 -Sep -12 0.43 <1 <2 <1 0.28 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 13 -Sep -12 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.24 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 17 -Sep -12 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.3 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 18 -Sep -12 0.6 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 20 -Sep -12 0.47 <1 <2 <1 0.24 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 24 -Sep -12 0.43 <1 <2 <1 0.31 48 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 27 -Sep -12 0.42 <1 <2 <1 0.19 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 1 -Oct -12 0.44 <1 2 <1 0.2 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 4 -Oct -12 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.45 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 11 -Oct -12 0.6 <1 <2 <1 0.35 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 18 -Oct -12 0.7 <1 <2 <1 1.8 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 22 -Oct -12 0.4 <1 <2 <1 1.8 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 29 -Oct -12 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.94 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 1 -Nov -12 0.76 <1 <2 <1 0.76 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 5 -Nov -12 0.49 <1 <2 <1 0.74 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 15 -Nov -12 0.65 <1 <2 <1 0.49 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 22 -Nov -12 0.51 <1 <2 <1 0.52 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 28 -Nov -12 0.66 <1 <2 <1 0.42 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 29 -Nov -12 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.41 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 30 -Nov -12 0.48 <1 <2 <1 0.43 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 4 -Dec -12 0.54 <1 <2 <1 0.39 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 6 -Dec -12 0.86 <1 <2 <1 0.24 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 11 -Dec -12 0.51 <1 2 <1 0.27 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 13 -Dec -12 0.63 <1 <2 <1 0.34 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 20 -Dec -12 1.2 <1 <2 <1 0.11 GV -098 Maple Ridge Chamber Main 24 -Dec -12 0.44 <1 NA 1 0.23 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 3 -Jan -12 0.93 <1 <2 6 <1 0.34 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 10 -Jan -12 0.91 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 17 -Jan -12 0.94 <1 2 4 <1 0.31 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 24 -Jan -12 0.68 <1 <2 3 <1 0.39 49 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 31 -Jan -12 1.1 <1 <2 3 <1 0.77 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 7 -Feb -12 0.83 <1 2 3 <1 0.33 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 14 -Feb -12 1 <1 <2 3 <1 0.3 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 21 -Feb -12 0.86 <1 <2 4 <1 0.42 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 28 -Feb -12 0.96 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 6 -Mar -12 0.91 <1 <2 4 <1 0.37 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 13 -Mar -12 0.86 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 20 -Mar -12 0.94 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 27 -Mar -12 0.9 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 3 -Apr -12 0.97 <1 <2 5 <1 0.46 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 10 -Apr -12 0.91 <1 2 5 <1 0.34 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 17 -Apr -12 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 24 -Apr -12 0.59 <1 <2 8 <1 0.3 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 1 -May -12 0.97 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 8 -May -12 0.97 <1 <2 6 <1 0.46 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 15 -May -12 0.87 <1 <2 9 <1 0.34 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 22 -May -12 0.97 <1 2 8 <1 0.37 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 29 -May -12 0.92 <1 <2 10 <1 0.35 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 5 -Jun -12 0.97 <1 <2 9 <1 0.33 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 12 -Jun -12 0.86 <1 <2 10 <1 0.35 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 19 -Jun -12 0.9 <1 2 9 <1 0.4 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 26 -Jun -12 0.96 <1 <2 9 <1 0.25 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 3 -Jul -12 1 <1 <2 11 <1 0.24 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 10 -Jul -12 0.9 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 50 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 17 -Jul -12 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 24 -Jul -12 0.95 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 31 -Jul -12 0.94 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 7 -Aug -12 0.97 <1 <2 12 <1 0.34 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 14 -Aug -12 0.92 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 21 -Aug -12 0.91 <1 <2 12 <1 0.32 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 28 -Aug -12 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 4 -Sep -12 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.28 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 11 -Sep -12 0.96 <1 <2 12 <1 0.28 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 18 -Sep -12 0.95 <1 2 11 <1 0.25 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 25 -Sep -12 0.68 <1 <2 14 <1 0.18 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 2 -Oct -12 1 <1 <2 13 <1 0.59 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 9 -Oct -12 0.89 <1 <2 12 <1 0.38 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 16 -Oct -12 1.2 <1 <2 11 <1 1.9 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 23 -Oct -12 1.1 <1 <2 10 <1 1.4 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 30 -Oct -12 1.1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.76 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 6 -Nov -12 1.1 <1 2 7 <1 0.72 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 13 -Nov -12 1.1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.54 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 20 -Nov -12 0.94 <1 <2 6 <1 0.49 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 27 -Nov -12 0.94 <1 <2 6 <1 0.44 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 4 -Dec -12 0.92 <1 <2 5 <1 0.37 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 11 -Dec -12 0.92 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 18 -Dec -12 0.93 <1 <2 3 <1 0.25 MPR -431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St. 24 -Dec -12 0.95 <1 NA 2 <1 0.2 51 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 3 -Jan -12 0.86 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 10 -Jan -12 0.67 <1 <2 3 <1 0.33 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 17 -Jan -12 0.62 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 24 -Jan -12 0.6 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 31 -Jan -12 1 <1 <2 3 <1 0.73 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 7 -Feb -12 0.83 <1 <2 3 <1 0.37 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 14 -Feb -12 0.79 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 21 -Feb -12 0.71 <1 <2 6 <1 0.37 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 28 -Feb -12 0.85 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 6 -Mar -12 0.77 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 13 -Mar -12 0.8 <1 2 4 <1 0.39 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 20 -Mar -12 0.85 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 27 -Mar -12 0.84 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 3 -Apr -12 0.88 <1 <2 7 <1 0.35 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 10 -Apr -12 0.82 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 17 -Apr -12 0.96 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 24 -Apr -12 0.86 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 1 -May -12 0.87 <1 <2 6 <1 0.35 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 8 -May -12 0.95 <1 <2 9 <1 0.5 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 15 -May -12 0.79 <1 <2 5 <1 0.37 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 22 -May -12 0.96 <1 <2 8 <1 0.28 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 29 -May -12 0.89 <1 2 9 <1 0.36 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 5 -Jun -12 0.85 <1 8 10 <1 0.34 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 12 -Jun -12 0.81 <1 <2 10 <1 0.38 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 19 -Jun -12 0.86 <1 <2 10 <1 0.31 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 26 -Jun -12 0.86 <1 <2 9 <1 0.28 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 3 -Jul -12 0.84 <1 <2 11 <1 0.21 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 10 -Jul -12 0.93 <1 <2 9 <1 0.28 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 17 -Jul -12 0.95 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 24 -Jul -12 0.76 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 31 -Jul -12 0.79 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 7 -Aug -12 0.88 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 14 -Aug -12 0.87 <1 <2 9 <1 0.28 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 21 -Aug -12 0.85 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 28 -Aug -12 0.86 <1 <2 11 <1 0.25 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 4 -Sep -12 0.71 <1 2 10 <1 0.38 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 11 -Sep -12 0.84 <1 <2 11 <1 0.32 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 18 -Sep -12 0.92 <1 <2 11 <1 0.25 52 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 25 -Sep -12 0.69 <1 <2 14 <1 0.17 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 2 -Oct -12 0.83 <1 <2 13 <1 0.36 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 9 -Oct -12 0.82 <1 <2 11 <1 0.4 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 16 -Oct -12 1 <1 <2 9 <1 1.3 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 23 -Oct -12 0.97 <1 2 9 <1 1.3 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 30 -Oct -12 0.96 <1 2 9 <1 0.68 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 6 -Nov -12 0.96 <1 <2 7 <1 0.73 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 13 -Nov -12 1.1 <1 2 7 <1 0.53 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 20 -Nov -12 0.81 <1 <2 6 <1 0.52 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 27 -Nov -12 0.83 <1 <2 6 <1 0.44 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 4 -Dec -12 0.86 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 11 -Dec -12 0.87 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 18 -Dec -12 0.85 <1 <2 3 <1 0.24 MPR -432 224 St. @ 122 Ave. 24 -Dec -12 0.81 <1 NA 3 <1 0.18 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 3 -Jan -12 0.77 <1 <2 3 <1 0.32 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 10 -Jan -12 0.65 <1 <2 3 <1 0.34 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 17 -Jan -12 0.79 <1 <2 6 <1 0.26 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 24 -Jan -12 0.85 <1 <2 3 <1 0.33 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 31 -Jan -12 0.84 <1 <2 4 <1 0.6 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 7 -Feb -12 0.67 <1 <2 2 <1 0.38 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 14 -Feb -12 0.81 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 21 -Feb -12 0.74 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 28 -Feb -12 0.66 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 6 -Mar -12 0.7 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 13 -Mar -12 0.81 <1 <2 3 <1 0.35 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 20 -Mar -12 0.82 <1 <2 3 <1 0.3 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 27 -Mar -12 0.82 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 3 -Apr -12 0.66 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 10 -Apr -12 0.7 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 53 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 17 -Apr -12 0.95 <1 <2 5 <1 3.9 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 24 -Apr -12 0.61 <1 6 6 <1 0.3 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 1 -May -12 0.76 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 8 -May -12 0.69 <1 <2 7 <1 0.51 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 15 -May -12 0.68 <1 <2 7 <1 0.41 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 22 -May -12 0.66 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 29 -May -12 0.8 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 5 -Jun -12 0.7 <1 <2 9 <1 0.33 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 12 -Jun -12 0.65 <1 <2 11 <1 2.1 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 19 -Jun -12 0.66 <1 <2 9 <1 1.6 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 26 -Jun -12 0.79 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 3 -Jul -12 0.62 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 10 -Jul -12 0.68 <1 2 13 <1 0.3 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 17 -Jul -12 0.78 <1 <2 10 <1 0.22 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 24 -Jul -12 0.76 <1 4 10 <1 0.22 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 31 -Jul -12 0.84 <1 2 10 <1 0.22 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 7 -Aug -12 0.66 <1 2 12 <1 0.28 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 14 -Aug -12 0.76 <1 <2 11 <1 1.5 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 21 -Aug -12 0.64 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 28 -Aug -12 0.76 <1 2 12 <1 0.23 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 4 -Sep -12 0.64 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 11 -Sep -12 0.76 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 18 -Sep -12 0.79 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 25 -Sep -12 0.67 <1 <2 13 <1 0.22 54 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 2 -Oct -12 0.85 <1 <2 12 <1 0.38 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 9 -Oct -12 0.74 <1 2 10 <1 0.39 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 16 -Oct -12 0.89 <1 <2 7 <1 1.1 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 23 -Oct -12 0.77 <1 <2 9 <1 1.3 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 30 -Oct -12 0.78 <1 <2 9 <1 0.78 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 6 -Nov -12 0.82 <1 <2 8 <1 10 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 7 -Nov -12 0.93 <1 <2 8 <1 0.68 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 13 -Nov -12 0.79 <1 2 8 <1 0.49 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 20 -Nov -12 0.99 <1 <2 6 <1 0.44 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 27 -Nov -12 0.68 <1 <2 7 <1 0.33 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 4 -Dec -12 0.59 <1 <2 6 <1 0.35 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 11 -Dec -12 0.83 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 18 -Dec -12 0.74 <1 <2 4 <1 0.24 MPR -433 232 St. North of 130 Ave. 24 -Dec -12 0.74 <1 NA 4 <1 0.19 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 3 -Jan -12 0.76 <1 2 5 <1 0.35 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 10 -Jan -12 0.69 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 17 -Jan -12 0.73 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 24 -Jan -12 0.68 <1 2 4 <1 0.32 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 31 -Jan -12 0.76 <1 <2 4 <1 0.7 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 7 -Feb -12 0.7 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 14 -Feb -12 0.8 <1 2 4 <1 0.33 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 21 -Feb -12 0.41 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 28 -Feb -12 0.75 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 6 -Mar -12 0.68 <1 4 5 <1 0.38 55 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 13 -Mar -12 0.65 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 20 -Mar -12 0.69 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 27 -Mar -12 0.73 <1 <2 5 <1 0.36 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 3 -Apr -12 0.72 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 10 -Apr -12 0.79 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 17 -Apr -12 0.73 <1 2 6 <1 0.25 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 24 -Apr -12 0.69 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 1 -May -12 0.67 <1 <2 8 <1 0.37 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 8 -May -12 0.38 <1 <2 9 <1 0.47 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 15 -May -12 0.49 <1 <2 10 <1 0.46 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 22 -May -12 0.46 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 29 -May -12 0.64 <1 <2 10 <1 0.31 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 5 -Jun -12 0.37 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 12 -Jun -12 0.72 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 19 -Jun -12 0.63 <1 [contami nation] LA 10 <1 0.27 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 26 -Jun -12 0.54 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 3 -Jul -12 0.61 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 10 -Jul -12 0.63 <1 <2 11 <1 0.24 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 17 -Jul -12 0.71 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 24 -Jul -12 0.45 <1 <2 11 <1 0.22 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 31 -Jul -12 0.61 <1 2 11 <1 0.24 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 7 -Aug -12 0.66 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 14 -Aug -12 0.7 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23 56 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 21 -Aug -12 0.61 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 28 -Aug -12 0.68 <1 <2 13 <1 0.36 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 4 -Sep -12 0.43 <1 2 12 <1 0.3 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 11 -Sep -12 0.75 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 18 -Sep -12 0.74 <1 4 12 <1 0.27 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 25 -Sep -12 0.68 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 2 -Oct -12 1.1 <1 <2 14 <1 0.5 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 9 -Oct -12 0.64 <1 <2 11 <1 0.39 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 16 -Oct -12 0.35 <1 18 11 <1 0.45 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 23 -Oct -12 0.89 <1 <2 10 <1 1.2 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 30 -Oct -12 0.48 <1 <2 9 <1 0.85 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 6 -Nov -12 0.5 <1 <2 10 <1 0.83 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 13 -Nov -12 0.51 <1 <2 8 <1 0.48 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 20 -Nov -12 0.49 <1 <2 8 <1 0.36 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 27 -Nov -12 0.66 <1 <2 6 <1 0.34 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 4 -Dec -12 0.67 <1 <2 5 <1 0.45 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 11 -Dec -12 0.72 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 18 -Dec -12 0.74 <1 2 4 <1 0.27 MPR -434 102 Ave. East of 241A St. 24 -Dec -12 0.62 <1 NA 3 <1 0.19 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 3 -Jan -12 0.59 <1 2 4 <1 0.34 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 10 -Jan -12 0.58 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 17 -Jan -12 0.6 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 24 -Jan -12 0.18 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 31 -Jan -12 0.73 <1 <2 4 <1 0.54 57 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 7 -Feb -12 0.69 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 14 -Feb -12 0.77 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 21 -Feb -12 0.04 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 28 -Feb -12 0.68 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 6 -Mar -12 0.67 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 13 -Mar -12 0.68 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 20 -Mar -12 0.68 <1 2 4 <1 7.2 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 21 -Mar -12 0.54 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 27 -Mar -12 0.67 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 3 -Apr -12 0.68 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 10 -Apr -12 0.69 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 17 -Apr -12 0.71 <1 <2 6 <1 0.25 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 24 -Apr -12 0.68 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 1 -May -12 0.53 <1 <2 7 <1 0.26 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 8 -May -12 0.25 <1 <2 11 <1 0.42 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 15 -May -12 0.55 <1 <2 8 <1 0.47 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 22 -May -12 0.31 <1 <2 8 <1 0.25 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 29 -May -12 0.53 <1 <2 9 <1 0.29 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 5 -Jun -12 0.32 <1 <2 10 <1 0.36 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 12 -Jun -12 0.31 <1 2 14 <1 0.23 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 19 -Jun -12 0.37 <1 <2 11 <1 0.25 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 26 -Jun -12 0.25 <1 2 12 <1 0.21 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 3 -Jul -12 0.18 <1 2 12 <1 0.19 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 10 -Jul -12 0.52 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23 58 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 17 -Jul -12 0.63 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 24 -Jul -12 0.11 <1 2 14 <1 0.18 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 31 -Jul -12 0.51 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 7 -Aug -12 0.36 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 14 -Aug -12 0.39 <1 2 14 <1 0.21 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 21 -Aug -12 0.34 <1 2 14 <1 0.28 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 28 -Aug -12 0.45 <1 <2 13 <1 0.22 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 4 -Sep -12 0.35 <1 2 13 <1 0.38 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 11 -Sep -12 0.37 <1 2 13 <1 0.22 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 18 -Sep -12 0.37 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 25 -Sep -12 0.37 <1 <2 15 <1 0.17 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 2 -Oct -12 0.67 <1 <2 14 <1 0.4 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 9 -Oct -12 0.46 <1 <2 13 <1 0.28 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 16 -Oct -12 0.44 <1 46 10 <1 1.6 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 23 -Oct -12 0.63 <1 <2 11 <1 1 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 30 -Oct -12 0.43 <1 <2 10 <1 0.71 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 6 -Nov -12 0.37 <1 <2 9 <1 0.63 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 13 -Nov -12 0.55 <1 <2 9 <1 0.44 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 20 -Nov -12 0.49 <1 <2 8 <1 0.37 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 27 -Nov -12 0.52 <1 <2 7 <1 0.33 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 4 -Dec -12 0.62 <1 <2 6 <1 0.36 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 11 -Dec -12 0.66 <1 <2 6 <1 0.26 MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 18 -Dec -12 0.66 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 59 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 24 -Dec -12 0.49 <1 NA 3 <1 0.19 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 3 -Jan -12 0.49 <1 4 4 <1 0.3 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 10 -Jan -12 0.47 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 17 -Jan -12 0.54 <1 <2 4 <1 0.24 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 24 -Jan -12 0.66 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 31 -Jan -12 0.47 <1 <2 3 <1 0.3 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 7 -Feb -12 0.54 <1 <2 4 <1 0.41 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 14 -Feb -12 0.61 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 21 -Feb -12 0.48 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 28 -Feb -12 0.48 <1 <2 4 <1 0.22 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 6 -Mar -12 0.57 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 13 -Mar -12 0.52 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 20 -Mar -12 0.51 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 27 -Mar -12 0.6 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 3 -Apr -12 0.65 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 10 -Apr -12 0.7 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 17 -Apr -12 0.57 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 24 -Apr -12 0.62 <1 <2 6 <1 0.36 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 1 -May -12 0.52 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 8 -May -12 0.52 <1 <2 10 <1 0.89 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 15 -May -12 0.62 <1 <2 8 <1 0.36 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 22 -May -12 0.54 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 29 -May -12 0.55 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 5 -Jun -12 0.56 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25 60 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 12 -Jun -12 0.36 <1 <2 14 <1 0.26 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 19 -Jun -12 0.6 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 26 -Jun -12 0.62 <1 <2 12 <1 2.3 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 3 -Jul -12 0.8 <1 <2 13 <1 0.19 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 10 -Jul -12 0.78 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 17 -Jul -12 1.1 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 24 -Jul -12 0.79 <1 2 13 <1 0.2 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 31 -Jul -12 0.43 <1 2 12 <1 0.33 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 7 -Aug -12 0.69 <1 2 12 <1 0.25 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 14 -Aug -12 0.76 <1 <2 14 <1 0.24 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 21 -Aug -12 0.61 <1 <2 13 <1 0.22 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 28 -Aug -12 1.2 <1 4 14 <1 0.23 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 4 -Sep -12 0.96 <1 <2 13 <1 0.27 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 11 -Sep -12 1.3 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 18 -Sep -12 1.2 <1 2 12 <1 0.23 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 25 -Sep -12 1.2 <1 <2 14 <1 0.25 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 2 -Oct -12 1.6 <1 <2 14 <1 0.49 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 9 -Oct -12 1.1 <1 6 13 <1 0.37 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 16 -Oct -12 0.73 <1 <2 10 <1 0.26 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 23 -Oct -12 0.81 <1 2 10 <1 1 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 30 -Oct -12 0.87 <1 <2 10 <1 0.73 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 6 -Nov -12 0.83 <1 <2 10 <1 0.54 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 13 -Nov -12 0.84 <1 <2 9 <1 0.41 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 20 -Nov -12 0.89 <1 <2 8 <1 0.42 61 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 27 -Nov -12 0.8 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 4 -Dec -12 0.83 <1 <2 7 <1 0.31 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 11 -Dec -12 0.79 <1 <2 6 <1 0.25 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 18 -Dec -12 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.19 MPR -436 125 Ave. West of AnseII St. 24 -Dec -12 1 <1 NA 4 <1 0.17 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 3 -Jan -12 0.65 <1 2 4 <1 0.32 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 10 -Jan -12 0.68 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 17 -Jan -12 0.57 <1 <2 3 <1 0.31 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 24 -Jan -12 0.69 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 31 -Jan -12 0.63 <1 <2 3 <1 0.52 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 7 -Feb -12 0.76 <1 <2 3 <1 0.38 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 14 -Feb -12 0.73 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 21 -Feb -12 0.76 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 28 -Feb -12 0.81 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 6 -Mar -12 0.53 <1 <2 3 <1 0.31 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 13 -Mar -12 0.66 <1 <2 3 <1 0.35 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 20 -Mar -12 0.62 <1 2 3 <1 0.23 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 27 -Mar -12 0.87 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 3 -Apr -12 0.44 <1 <2 7 <1 0.31 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 10 -Apr -12 0.75 <1 <2 5 <1 0.37 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 17 -Apr -12 0.81 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 24 -Apr -12 0.63 <1 6 5 <1 0.26 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 1 -May -12 0.55 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 8 -May -12 0.71 <1 <2 10 <1 0.33 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 15 -May -12 0.65 <1 <2 9 <1 0.43 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 22 -May -12 0.83 <1 <2 6 <1 0.35 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 29 -May -12 0.76 <1 <2 7 <1 0.28 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 5 -Jun -12 0.68 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 12 -Jun -12 0.81 <1 <2 14 <1 0.73 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 19 -Jun -12 0.95 <1 <2 12 <1 0.28 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 26 -Jun -12 0.69 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 3 -Jul -12 0.8 <1 <2 13 <1 0.2 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 10 -Jul -12 0.87 <1 2 11 <1 0.23 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 17 -Jul -12 1 <1 4 10 <1 0.24 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 24 -Jul -12 0.74 <1 8 12 <1 0.2 62 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 31 -Jul -12 0.85 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 7 -Aug -12 0.76 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 14 -Aug -12 0.74 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 21 -Aug -12 0.65 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 28 -Aug -12 1.2 <1 <2 13 <1 0.22 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 4 -Sep -12 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 11 -Sep -12 1.2 <1 <2 13 <1 0.28 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 18 -Sep -12 1.1 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 25 -Sep -12 1.2 <1 <2 14 <1 0.24 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 2 -Oct -12 0.96 <1 2 15 <1 0.24 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 9 -Oct -12 1.1 <1 2 12 <1 0.38 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 16 -Oct -12 1.3 <1 2 10 <1 1.1 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 23 -Oct -12 1.1 <1 <2 10 <1 1 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 30 -Oct -12 0.91 <1 <2 9 <1 0.83 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 6 -Nov -12 0.91 <1 <2 10 <1 0.57 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 13 -Nov -12 0.92 <1 <2 8 <1 0.47 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 20 -Nov -12 0.89 <1 2 7 <1 0.4 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 27 -Nov -12 0.89 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 4 -Dec -12 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 11 -Dec -12 0.92 <1 12 6 <1 0.27 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 18 -Dec -12 1.1 <1 <2 4 <1 0.22 MPR -437 248 St. @ 116 Ave. 24 -Dec -12 1 <1 NA 3 <1 0.17 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 3 -Jan -12 0.26 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 10 -Jan -12 0.64 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 17 -Jan -12 0.58 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 24 -Jan -12 0.23 <1 2 4 <1 0.29 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 31 -Jan -12 0.36 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 7 -Feb -12 0.48 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 14 -Feb -12 0.68 <1 <2 4 <1 0.25 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 21 -Feb -12 0.45 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 28 -Feb -12 0.53 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 6 -Mar -12 0.61 <1 <2 3 <1 0.26 63 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 13 -Mar -12 0.48 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 20 -Mar -12 0.67 <1 <2 4 <1 0.25 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 27 -Mar -12 0.87 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 3 -Apr -12 0.49 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 10 -Apr -12 0.58 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 17 -Apr -12 0.65 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 24 -Apr -12 0.35 <1 4 6 <1 0.29 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 1 -May -12 0.41 <1 <2 7 <1 0.28 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 8 -May -12 0.44 <1 <2 11 <1 0.55 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 15 -May -12 0.54 <1 <2 7 <1 0.28 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 22 -May -12 0.37 <1 4 7 <1 0.27 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 29 -May -12 0.48 <1 <2 8 <1 0.28 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 5 -Jun -12 0.54 <1 2 10 <1 0.26 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 12 -Jun -12 0.23 <1 <2 11 <1 0.25 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 19 -Jun -12 0.34 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 26 -Jun -12 0.56 <1 <2 12 <1 0.31 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 3 -Jul -12 0.64 <1 2 12 <1 0.22 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 10 -Jul -12 0.77 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 17 -Jul -12 0.74 <1 <2 12 <1 0.21 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 24 -Jul -12 0.64 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 31 -Jul -12 0.31 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 7 -Aug -12 0.7 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 14 -Aug -12 0.34 <1 8 13 <1 0.25 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 21 -Aug -12 0.59 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26 64 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 28 -Aug -12 0.55 <1 <2 13 <1 0.49 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 4 -Sep -12 0.72 <1 <2 12 <1 0.32 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 11 -Sep -12 1.2 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 18 -Sep -12 1.2 <1 <2 12 <1 0.28 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 25 -Sep -12 1.1 <1 <2 14 <1 0.21 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 2 -Oct -12 0.98 <1 <2 16 <1 0.16 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 9 -Oct -12 1.1 <1 16 11 <1 0.34 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 16 -Oct -12 0.84 <1 <2 10 <1 0.39 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 23 -Oct -12 1.2 <1 <2 10 <1 1.1 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 30 -Oct -12 0.95 <1 <2 9 <1 0.88 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 6 -Nov -12 0.93 <1 <2 10 <1 1.2 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 13 -Nov -12 0.92 <1 <2 9 <1 0.5 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 20 -Nov -12 0.91 <1 <2 8 <1 0.4 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 27 -Nov -12 0.86 <1 2 6 <1 0.44 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 4 -Dec -12 0.81 <1 2 7 <1 0.41 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 11 -Dec -12 0.85 <1 <2 6 <1 0.25 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 18 -Dec -12 1.2 <1 <2 4 <1 0.22 MPR -438 125 Ave. West off 256 St. 24 -Dec -12 1.1 <1 NA 4 <1 0.17 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 3 -Jan -12 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 10 -Jan -12 1.2 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 17 -Jan -12 1.1 <1 2 3 <1 0.26 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 24 -Jan -12 1 <1 4 4 <1 0.28 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 31 -Jan -12 1.3 <1 <2 4 <1 0.37 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 7 -Feb -12 0.43 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 65 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 14 -Feb -12 0.32 <1 <2 3 <1 0.29 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 21 -Feb -12 0.44 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 28 -Feb -12 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 6 -Mar -12 0.93 <1 <2 5 <1 0.39 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 13 -Mar -12 0.89 <1 <2 3 <1 0.35 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 20 -Mar -12 0.56 <1 2 4 <1 0.26 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 27 -Mar -12 1.2 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 3 -Apr -12 0.64 <1 <2 6 <1 0.41 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 10 -Apr -12 0.9 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 17 -Apr -12 1.1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.29 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 24 -Apr -12 0.42 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 1 -May -12 0.45 <1 <2 9 <1 0.3 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 8 -May -12 0.27 <1 <2 10 <1 0.65 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 15 -May -12 0.75 <1 <2 9 <1 0.23 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 22 -May -12 0.56 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 29 -May -12 0.5 <1 <2 9 <1 0.3 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 5 -Jun -12 0.35 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 12 -Jun -12 0.05 <1 2 11 <1 0.26 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 19 -Jun -12 0.1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 26 -Jun -12 0.32 <1 2 13 <1 0.25 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 3 -Jul -12 0.12 <1 4 13 <1 0.22 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 10 -Jul -12 0.13 <1 <2 14 <1 0.24 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 17 -Jul -12 0.75 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 24 -Jul -12 1.2 <1 <2 14 <1 0.22 66 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 31 -Jul -12 0.28 <1 <2 14 <1 0.27 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 7 -Aug -12 1 <1 <2 15 <1 0.26 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 14 -Aug -12 1.2 <1 <2 15 <1 0.3 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 21 -Aug -12 0.92 <1 [contami nation] LA 16 <1 0.26 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 28 -Aug -12 1.5 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 4 -Sep -12 1.3 <1 <2 13 <1 0.31 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 11 -Sep -12 1.5 <1 2 14 <1 0.25 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 18 -Sep -12 0.81 <1 <2 13 <1 0.32 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 25 -Sep -12 1.3 <1 14 15 <1 0.22 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 2 -Oct -12 1.4 <1 <2 15 <1 0.15 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 9 -Oct -12 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 16 -Oct -12 1 <1 12 10 <1 0.33 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 23 -Oct -12 0.68 <1 <2 10 <1 0.69 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 30 -Oct -12 1.2 <1 <2 9 <1 0.86 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 6 -Nov -12 1.3 <1 2 9 <1 0.55 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 13 -Nov -12 0.71 <1 <2 7 <1 0.56 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 20 -Nov -12 0.68 <1 <2 7 <1 0.49 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 27 -Nov -12 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.37 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 4 -Dec -12 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.36 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 11 -Dec -12 0.71 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 18 -Dec -12 1.2 <1 <2 4 <1 0.24 MPR -439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.) 24 -Dec -12 1.2 <1 NA 3 <1 0.2 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 3 -Jan -12 0.31 <1 <2 3 <1 0.31 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 10 -Jan -12 0.92 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34 67 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 17 -Jan -12 0.78 <1 2 3 <1 0.27 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 24 -Jan -12 0.92 <1 2 4 <1 0.35 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 31 -Jan -12 1.2 <1 <2 3 <1 0.71 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 7 -Feb -12 1.1 <1 <2 2 <1 0.3 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 14 -Feb -12 0.89 <1 <2 3 <1 0.29 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 21 -Feb -12 0.93 <1 <2 3 <1 0.37 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 28 -Feb -12 1.2 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 6 -Mar -12 0.88 <1 <2 4 <1 0.39 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 13 -Mar -12 1.2 <1 2 3 <1 0.41 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 20 -Mar -12 0.91 <1 <2 3 <1 0.34 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 27 -Mar -12 1 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 3 -Apr -12 0.97 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 10 -Apr -12 0.9 <1 <2 5 <1 0.36 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 17 -Apr -12 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.26 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 24 -Apr -12 0.86 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 1 -May -12 0.82 <1 2 5 <1 0.4 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 8 -May -12 0.87 <1 <2 6 <1 0.4 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 15 -May -12 0.65 <1 <2 7 <1 0.36 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 22 -May -12 0.93 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 29 -May -12 0.84 <1 <2 8 <1 0.37 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 5 -Jun -12 0.92 <1 <2 8 <1 0.34 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 12 -Jun -12 0.8 <1 <2 10 <1 0.31 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 19 -Jun -12 0.72 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 26 -Jun -12 0.9 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 3 -Jul -12 0.91 <1 <2 11 <1 0.21 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 10 -Jul -12 0.91 <1 2 12 <1 0.31 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 17 -Jul -12 1 <1 <2 9 <1 0.22 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 24 -Jul -12 0.83 <1 4 9 <1 0.25 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 31 -Jul -12 0.81 <1 <2 9 <1 0.26 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 7 -Aug -12 1.1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.26 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 14 -Aug -12 0.83 <1 <2 9 <1 0.23 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 21 -Aug -12 0.83 <1 <2 10 6 0.33 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 22 -Aug -12 0.87 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 28 -Aug -12 0.9 <1 2 11 <1 0.23 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 4 -Sep -12 0.8 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 11 -Sep -12 0.66 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 18 -Sep -12 0.92 <1 6 10 <1 0.24 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 25 -Sep -12 0.66 <1 <2 13 <1 0.16 68 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 2 -Oct -12 1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.59 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 9 -Oct -12 0.86 <1 <2 11 <1 0.36 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 16 -Oct -12 0.98 <1 <2 8 <1 1.5 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 23 -Oct -12 0.98 <1 <2 8 <1 1.4 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 30 -Oct -12 1.1 <1 <2 9 <1 0.75 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 6 -Nov -12 1.1 <1 4 7 <1 0.86 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 13 -Nov -12 0.97 <1 <2 6 <1 0.53 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 20 -Nov -12 0.93 <1 <2 6 <1 0.49 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 27 -Nov -12 0.77 <1 <2 6 <1 0.39 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 4 -Dec -12 0.92 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 11 -Dec -12 0.78 <1 <2 4 <1 0.23 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 18 -Dec -12 0.66 <1 <2 3 <1 0.25 MPR -440 232 St. @ 117 Ave. 24 -Dec -12 0.86 <1 NA 2 <1 0.21 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 3 -Jan -12 0.75 <1 <2 3 <1 0.38 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 10 -Jan -12 0.71 <1 <2 3 <1 0.43 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 17 -Jan -12 0.77 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 24 -Jan -12 0.87 <1 <2 4 <1 0.38 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 31 -Jan -12 0.61 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 7 -Feb -12 0.63 <1 <2 3 <1 0.3 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 14 -Feb -12 0.6 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 21 -Feb -12 0.43 <1 2 4 <1 0.31 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 28 -Feb -12 0.5 <1 2 4 <1 0.28 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 6 -Mar -12 0.71 <1 <2 4 <1 0.47 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 13 -Mar -12 0.59 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 20 -Mar -12 0.55 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 27 -Mar -12 0.52 <1 <2 4 <1 0.47 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 3 -Apr -12 0.56 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 10 -Apr -12 0.64 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 17 -Apr -12 0.7 <1 2 6 <1 0.33 69 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 24 -Apr -12 0.6 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 1 -May -12 0.63 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 8 -May -12 0.53 <1 <2 9 <1 0.48 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 15 -May -12 0.61 <1 <2 8 <1 0.4 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 22 -May -12 0.47 <1 <2 9 <1 0.23 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 29 -May -12 0.45 <1 2 7 <1 0.29 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 5 -Jun -12 0.59 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 12 -Jun -12 0.53 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 19 -Jun -12 0.55 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 26 -Jun -12 0.63 <1 <2 11 <1 0.2 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 3 -Jul -12 0.58 <1 <2 14 <1 0.19 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 10 -Jul -12 0.58 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 17 -Jul -12 0.4 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 24 -Jul -12 0.29 <1 <2 13 <1 0.22 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 31 -Jul -12 0.49 <1 <2 14 <1 0.33 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 7 -Aug -12 0.47 <1 <2 14 <1 0.25 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 14 -Aug -12 0.59 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 21 -Aug -12 0.3 <1 <2 15 <1 0.35 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 28 -Aug -12 0.55 <1 <2 14 <1 0.19 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 4 -Sep -12 0.62 <1 2 11 <1 0.44 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 11 -Sep -12 0.49 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 18 -Sep -12 0.56 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 25 -Sep -12 0.55 <1 <2 14 <1 0.16 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 2 -Oct -12 0.45 <1 <2 14 <1 0.11 70 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 9 -Oct -12 0.3 <1 4 13 <1 0.26 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 16 -Oct -12 0.36 <1 <2 10 <1 0.33 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 23 -Oct -12 0.65 <1 <2 10 <1 1.4 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 30 -Oct -12 0.55 <1 2 10 <1 0.87 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 6 -Nov -12 0.68 <1 <2 10 <1 0.58 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 13 -Nov -12 0.72 <1 2 7 <1 0.43 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 20 -Nov -12 0.53 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 27 -Nov -12 0.54 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 4 -Dec -12 0.42 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 11 -Dec -12 0.59 <1 <2 7 <1 0.2 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 18 -Dec -12 0.69 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29 MPR -441 132 Ave. Way Y 24 -Dec -12 0.57 <1 NA 3 <1 0.17 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 3 -Jan -12 0.4 <1 2 5 <1 0.29 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 10 -Jan -12 0.42 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 17 -Jan -12 0.47 <1 <2 4 <1 0.25 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 24 -Jan -12 0.46 <1 <2 3 <1 0.3 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 31 -Jan -12 0.49 <1 <2 3 <1 0.44 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 7 -Feb -12 0.48 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 14 -Feb -12 0.64 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 21 -Feb -12 0.46 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 28 -Feb -12 0.54 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 6 -Mar -12 0.53 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 13 -Mar -12 0.47 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 20 -Mar -12 0.5 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25 71 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 27 -Mar -12 0.57 <1 4 5 <1 0.26 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 3 -Apr -12 0.48 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 10 -Apr -12 0.54 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 17 -Apr -12 0.38 <1 2 6 <1 0.24 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 24 -Apr -12 0.58 <1 <2 7 <1 0.23 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 1 -May -12 0.39 <1 <2 8 <1 0.29 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 8 -May -12 0.38 <1 6 9 <1 1.5 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 15 -May -12 0.42 <1 <2 9 <1 0.3 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 22 -May -12 0.54 <1 <2 9 <1 0.26 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 29 -May -12 0.41 <1 [contami nation] LA 10 <1 0.32 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 5 -Jun -12 0.3 <1 <2 11 <1 0.35 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 12 -Jun -12 0.1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 19 -Jun -12 0.3 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 26 -Jun -12 0.2 <1 2 12 <1 0.22 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 3 -Jul -12 0.28 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 10 -Jul -12 0.26 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 17 -Jul -12 0.43 <1 <2 13 <1 0.2 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 24 -Jul -12 0.14 <1 4 14 <1 0.21 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 31 -Jul -12 0.27 <1 2 13 <1 0.31 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 7 -Aug -12 0.28 <1 <2 13 <1 0.34 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 14 -Aug -12 0.29 <1 2 14 <1 0.28 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 21 -Aug -12 0.34 <1 <2 14 <1 0.21 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 28 -Aug -12 0.23 <1 4 14 <1 0.22 72 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 4 -Sep -12 0.21 <1 <2 13 <1 0.31 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 11 -Sep -12 0.3 <1 <2 14 <1 0.24 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 18 -Sep -12 0.36 <1 <2 13 <1 0.24 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 25 -Sep -12 0.41 <1 <2 14 <1 0.18 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 2 -Oct -12 0.85 <1 <2 15 <1 0.34 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 9 -Oct -12 0.53 <1 8 12 <1 0.35 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 16 -Oct -12 0.64 <1 <2 10 <1 1 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 23 -Oct -12 0.6 <1 <2 10 <1 1 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 30 -Oct -12 0.65 <1 <2 10 <1 0.66 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 6 -Nov -12 0.62 <1 <2 10 <1 0.56 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 13 -Nov -12 0.71 <1 <2 8 <1 0.47 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 20 -Nov -12 0.56 <1 <2 8 <1 0.4 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 27 -Nov -12 0.55 <1 <2 7 <1 0.33 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 4 -Dec -12 0.48 <1 <2 6 <1 0.37 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 11 -Dec -12 0.56 <1 2 6 <1 0.25 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 18 -Dec -12 0.61 <1 2 4 <1 0.21 MPR -442 Princess St. @ Ditton St. 24 -Dec -12 0.7 <1 NA 4 <1 0.19 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 3 -Jan -12 0.65 <1 2 5 <1 0.34 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 10 -Jan -12 0.69 <1 2 5 <1 0.31 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 17 -Jan -12 0.81 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 24 -Jan -12 0.8 <1 2 5 <1 0.37 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 31 -Jan -12 0.89 <1 <2 3 <1 0.69 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 7 -Feb -12 0.82 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 14 -Feb -12 0.59 <1 2 5 <1 0.33 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 21 -Feb -12 0.49 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 28 -Feb -12 0.49 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 6 -Mar -12 0.54 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 13 -Mar -12 0.47 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 73 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 20 -Mar -12 0.54 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 27 -Mar -12 0.53 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 3 -Apr -12 0.59 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 10 -Apr -12 0.52 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 17 -Apr -12 0.67 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 24 -Apr -12 0.59 <1 <2 7 <1 0.29 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 1 -May -12 0.56 <1 4 6 <1 0.31 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 8 -May -12 0.49 <1 <2 9 <1 0.46 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 15 -May -12 0.51 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 22 -May -12 0.58 <1 <2 8 <1 0.23 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 29 -May -12 0.63 <1 <2 8 <1 0.32 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 5 -Jun -12 0.77 <1 <2 10 <1 0.35 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 12 -Jun -12 0.81 <1 <2 10 <1 0.31 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 19 -Jun -12 0.79 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 26 -Jun -12 0.83 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 3 -Jul -12 0.93 <1 2 11 <1 0.2 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 10 -Jul -12 0.93 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 17 -Jul -12 0.95 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 24 -Jul -12 0.82 <1 <2 9 <1 0.22 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 31 -Jul -12 0.82 <1 <2 9 <1 0.27 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 7 -Aug -12 0.93 <1 <2 11 <1 0.4 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 14 -Aug -12 0.88 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 21 -Aug -12 0.92 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 28 -Aug -12 0.89 <1 2 11 <1 0.24 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 4 -Sep -12 0.72 <1 2 12 <1 0.32 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 11 -Sep -12 0.75 <1 2 12 <1 0.3 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 18 -Sep -12 0.81 <1 2 11 <1 0.26 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 25 -Sep -12 0.67 <1 2 14 <1 0.14 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 2 -Oct -12 0.87 <1 <2 14 <1 0.37 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 9 -Oct -12 0.8 <1 <2 11 <1 0.42 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 16 -Oct -12 1 <1 <2 10 <1 1.2 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 23 -Oct -12 0.84 <1 <2 9 <1 1.5 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 30 -Oct -12 1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.88 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 6 -Nov -12 0.84 <1 <2 8 <1 0.79 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 13 -Nov -12 1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.5 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 20 -Nov -12 0.71 <1 <2 7 <1 0.55 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 27 -Nov -12 0.77 <1 <2 6 <1 0.41 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 4 -Dec -12 0.75 <1 <2 5 <1 0.39 74 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 11 -Dec -12 0.81 <1 <2 6 <1 0.35 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 18 -Dec -12 0.79 <1 <2 3 <1 0.26 MPR -443 216 St. @ Donovan 24 -Dec -12 0.76 <1 NA 3 <1 0.19 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 3 -Jan -12 0.6 <1 4 4 <1 0.27 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 10 -Jan -12 0.58 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 17 -Jan -12 0.7 <1 <2 3 <1 0.24 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 24 -Jan -12 0.65 <1 8 3 <1 0.3 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 31 -Jan -12 0.46 <1 <2 3 <1 0.27 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 7 -Feb -12 0.53 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 14 -Feb -12 0.7 <1 <2 3 <1 0.3 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 21 -Feb -12 0.36 <1 <2 3 <1 0.28 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 28 -Feb -12 0.49 <1 2 3 <1 0.31 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 6 -Mar -12 0.53 <1 2 3 <1 0.3 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 13 -Mar -12 0.66 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 20 -Mar -12 0.44 <1 <2 3 <1 0.24 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 27 -Mar -12 0.52 <1 2 4 <1 0.29 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 3 -Apr -12 0.44 <1 2 7 <1 0.24 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 10 -Apr -12 0.62 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 17 -Apr -12 0.58 <1 <2 5 <1 0.36 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 24 -Apr -12 0.58 <1 2 7 <1 0.26 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 1 -May -12 0.62 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 8 -May -12 0.4 <1 <2 9 <1 0.55 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 15 -May -12 0.45 <1 <2 9 <1 0.41 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 22 -May -12 0.56 <1 <2 5 <1 0.24 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 29 -May -12 0.34 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3 75 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 5 -Jun -12 0.53 <1 2 10 <1 0.42 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 12 -Jun -12 0.58 <1 2 10 <1 0.52 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 19 -Jun -12 0.49 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 26 -Jun -12 0.4 <1 <2 11 <1 0.24 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 3 -Jul -12 0.5 <1 2 12 <1 0.23 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 10 -Jul -12 0.49 <1 <2 12 <1 0.4 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 17 -Jul -12 0.69 <1 38 11 <1 0.26 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 24 -Jul -12 0.15 <1 <2 12 <1 0.21 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 31 -Jul -12 0.38 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 7 -Aug -12 0.59 <1 <2 12 <1 0.28 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 14 -Aug -12 0.67 <1 <2 12 <1 0.3 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 21 -Aug -12 0.51 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 28 -Aug -12 0.57 <1 2 13 <1 0.24 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 4 -Sep -12 0.52 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 11 -Sep -12 0.33 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 18 -Sep -12 0.53 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 25 -Sep -12 0.55 <1 <2 14 <1 0.21 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 2 -Oct -12 0.42 <1 <2 14 <1 0.16 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 9 -Oct -12 0.58 <1 <2 11 <1 5.5 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 11 -Oct -12 0.44 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 16 -Oct -12 0.88 <1 <2 9 <1 0.89 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 23 -Oct -12 0.68 <1 <2 10 <1 1.2 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 30 -Oct -12 0.69 <1 <2 9 <1 0.79 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 6 -Nov -12 0.58 <1 <2 9 <1 0.61 76 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 13 -Nov -12 0.76 <1 <2 7 <1 0.47 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 20 -Nov -12 0.49 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 27 -Nov -12 0.56 <1 <2 6 <1 0.37 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 4 -Dec -12 0.47 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 11 -Dec -12 0.53 <1 2 5 <1 0.32 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 18 -Dec -12 0.59 <1 <2 5 <1 0.2 MPR -444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St. 24 -Dec -12 0.67 <1 NA 4 <1 0.2 MPR -445 127th A Set: and 266 3 -Jan -12 0.3 <1 42 3 <1 0.3 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 10 -Jan -12 0.45 <1 30 5 <1 0.26 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 17 -Jan -12 0.27 <1 26 3 <1 0.19 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 24 -Jan -12 0.4 <1 16 3 <1 0.22 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 31 -Jan -12 0.43 <1 18 3 <1 0.21 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 7 -Feb -12 0.19 <1 <2 3 <1 0.27 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 14 -Feb -12 0.29 <1 <2 4 <1 0.23 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 21 -Feb -12 0.61 <1 <2 3 <1 0.26 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 28 -Feb -12 0.29 <1 <2 3 <1 0.24 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 6 -Mar -12 0.41 <1 2 3 <1 0.22 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 13 -Mar -12 0.22 <1 <2 3 <1 0.22 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 20 -Mar -12 0.56 <1 <2 3 <1 0.24 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 27 -Mar -12 0.73 <1 <2 4 <1 0.25 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 3 -Apr -12 0.6 <1 <2 5 <1 0.24 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 10 -Apr -12 0.48 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 17 -Apr -12 0.4 <1 <2 5 <1 0.2 MPR -445 127th Ave.. and 266 24 -Apr -12 0.52 <1 4 6 <1 0.23 77 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -445 127th ASt. and 266 1 -May -12 0.2 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28 MPR -445 127th ASt. and 266 8 -May -12 0.11 <1 2 10 <1 0.41 MPR -445 127th A Set: and 266 15 -May -12 0.31 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 22 -May -12 0.06 <1 2 5 <1 0.25 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 29 -May -12 0.09 <1 2 8 <1 0.26 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 5 -Jun -12 0.02 <1 2 11 <1 0.24 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 12 -Jun -12 0.09 <1 2 12 <1 0.22 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 19 -Jun -12 0.24 <1 <2 11 <1 0.3 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 26 -Jun -12 0.56 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 3 -Jul -12 0.2 <1 <2 12 <1 0.3 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 10 -Jul -12 0.16 <1 <2 13 <1 0.2 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 17 -Jul -12 0.32 <1 <2 14 <1 0.18 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 24 -Jul -12 0.47 <1 4 14 <1 0.18 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 31 -Jul -12 0.79 <1 <2 14 <1 0.24 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 7 -Aug -12 0.79 <1 <2 15 <1 0.24 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 14 -Aug -12 0.26 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 21 -Aug -12 0.65 <1 <2 15 <1 0.24 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 28 -Aug -12 0.93 <1 <2 16 <1 0.19 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 4 -Sep -12 0.84 <1 <2 15 <1 0.2 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 11 -Sep -12 0.5 <1 <2 15 <1 0.17 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 18 -Sep -12 1.1 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 25 -Sep -12 1.1 <1 4 16 <1 0.2 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 2 -Oct -12 0.95 <1 <2 17 <1 0.15 MPR -445 127th Ave.. and 266 9 -Oct -12 0.8 <1 <2 13 <1 0.22 78 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -445 127th ASt. and 266 16 -Oct -12 0.64 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27 MPR -445 127th ASt. and 266 23 -Oct -12 0.53 <1 26 10 <1 0.6 MPR -445 127th A Set: and 266 30 -Oct -12 0.62 <1 <2 10 <1 0.65 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 6 -Nov -12 0.72 <1 2 10 <1 2.1 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 13 -Nov -12 0.7 <1 2 9 <1 0.59 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 20 -Nov -12 0.54 <1 <2 8 <1 0.37 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 27 -Nov -12 0.5 <1 <2 7 <1 0.33 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 4 -Dec -12 0.67 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 11 -Dec -12 0.64 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 18 -Dec -12 0.66 <1 <2 5 <1 0.22 MPR -445 127th Ast. and 266 24 -Dec -12 1.1 <1 NA 4 <1 0.15 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 3 -Jan -12 0.71 <1 2 3 <1 0.3 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 10 -Jan -12 0.68 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 17 -Jan -12 0.68 <1 <2 3 <1 0.28 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 24 -Jan -12 0.9 <1 <2 3 <1 0.34 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 31 -Jan -12 0.66 <1 <2 3 <1 0.29 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 7 -Feb -12 0.81 <1 2 3 <1 0.37 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 14 -Feb -12 0.89 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 21 -Feb -12 0.73 <1 2 4 <1 0.31 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 28 -Feb -12 0.85 <1 2 3 <1 0.29 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 6 -Mar -12 0.79 <1 10 3 <1 0.29 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 13 -Mar -12 0.74 <1 <2 3 <1 26 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 14 -Mar -12 [Not taken] NA <1 10 [Not taken] NA <1 0.59 79 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 20 -Mar -12 0.72 <1 2 3 <1 0.35 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 27 -Mar -12 0.85 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 3 -Apr -12 0.66 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 10 -Apr -12 0.61 <1 <2 4 <1 0.42 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 17 -Apr -12 0.56 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 24 -Apr -12 0.52 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 1 -May -12 0.73 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 8 -May -12 1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.71 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 15 -May -12 0.73 <1 2 8 <1 0.3 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 22 -May -12 0.75 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 29 -May -12 0.78 <1 <2 7 <1 0.37 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 5 -Jun -12 0.65 <1 2 10 <1 0.28 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 12 -Jun -12 0.72 <1 <2 10 <1 0.32 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 19 -Jun -12 0.7 <1 <2 10 <1 0.33 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 26 -Jun -12 0.5 <1 <2 11 <1 0.33 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 3 -Jul -12 1.1 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 10 -Jul -12 0.74 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 17 -Jul -12 0.62 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 24 -Jul -12 0.73 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 31 -Jul -12 0.93 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 7 -Aug -12 0.56 <1 <2 9 <1 0.32 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 14 -Aug -12 0.35 <1 <2 13 <1 0.31 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 21 -Aug -12 0.8 <1 4 13 <1 0.27 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 28 -Aug -12 0.35 <1 10 13 <1 0.93 80 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 4 -Sep -12 0.67 <1 <2 12 <1 0.36 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 11 -Sep -12 0.87 <1 <2 13 <1 0.27 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 18 -Sep -12 0.97 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 25 -Sep -12 0.83 <1 4 13 <1 0.21 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 2 -Oct -12 1.1 <1 <2 14 <1 0.21 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 9 -Oct -12 1.1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 16 -Oct -12 0.92 <1 280 9 <1 0.35 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 23 -Oct -12 0.7 <1 <2 9 <1 0.52 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 30 -Oct -12 0.77 <1 <2 8 <1 0.75 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 6 -Nov -12 0.8 <1 <2 9 <1 0.83 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 13 -Nov -12 0.88 <1 <2 7 <1 0.57 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 20 -Nov -12 1.2 <1 <2 7 <1 0.46 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 27 -Nov -12 0.91 <1 <2 6 <1 0.38 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 4 -Dec -12 0.92 <1 <2 6 <1 0.38 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 11 -Dec -12 1.2 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 18 -Dec -12 0.86 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31 MPR -446 128th Ave and Willow Place 24 -Dec -12 0.94 <1 NA 3 <1 0.21 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 3 -Jan -12 0.57 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 10 -Jan -12 0.63 <1 2 6 <1 0.33 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 17 -Jan -12 0.53 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 24 -Jan -12 0.68 <1 <2 3 <1 0.32 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 31 -Jan -12 0.62 <1 2 4 <1 0.51 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 7 -Feb -12 0.67 <1 2 4 <1 0.29 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 14 -Feb -12 0.5 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 21 -Feb -12 0.43 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 28 -Feb -12 0.43 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 6 -Mar -12 0.47 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 13 -Mar -12 0.46 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 81 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 20 -Mar -12 0.51 <1 2 5 <1 0.36 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 27 -Mar -12 0.43 <1 2 6 <1 0.29 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 3 -Apr -12 0.43 <1 <2 7 <1 0.26 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 10 -Apr -12 0.53 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 17 -Apr -12 0.42 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 24 -Apr -12 0.35 <1 <2 7 <1 0.24 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 1 -May -12 0.47 <1 <2 7 <1 0.31 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 8 -May -12 0.41 <1 <2 10 <1 0.51 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 15 -May -12 0.46 <1 <2 9 <1 0.36 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 22 -May -12 0.41 <1 <2 8 <1 0.26 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 29 -May -12 0.43 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 5 -Jun -12 0.36 <1 <2 11 <1 0.34 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 12 -Jun -12 0.53 <1 <2 11 <1 0.34 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 19 -Jun -12 0.49 <1 <2 10 <1 0.31 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 26 -Jun -12 0.59 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 3 -Jul -12 0.64 <1 <2 12 <1 0.2 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 10 -Jul -12 0.51 <1 <2 10 <1 0.26 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 17 -Jul -12 0.74 <1 6 11 <1 0.24 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 24 -Jul -12 0.61 <1 4 11 <1 0.19 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 31 -Jul -12 0.61 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 7 -Aug -12 0.55 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 14 -Aug -12 0.66 <1 4 12 <1 0.28 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 21 -Aug -12 0.62 <1 2 12 <1 0.28 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 28 -Aug -12 0.62 <1 2 12 <1 0.36 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 4 -Sep -12 0.42 <1 <2 12 <1 0.34 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 11 -Sep -12 0.48 <1 2 13 <1 0.24 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 18 -Sep -12 0.47 <1 2 12 <1 0.27 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 25 -Sep -12 0.48 <1 <2 15 <1 0.16 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 2 -Oct -12 0.78 <1 <2 15 <1 0.4 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 9 -Oct -12 0.66 <1 2 12 <1 0.39 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 16 -Oct -12 0.88 <1 <2 11 <1 0.91 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 23 -Oct -12 0.67 <1 <2 10 <1 1.2 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 30 -Oct -12 0.71 <1 <2 10 <1 0.71 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 6 -Nov -12 0.68 <1 <2 9 <1 0.69 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 13 -Nov -12 0.79 <1 <2 8 <1 0.47 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 20 -Nov -12 0.64 <1 <2 7 <1 0.41 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 27 -Nov -12 0.69 <1 <2 6 <1 0.35 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 4 -Dec -12 0.49 <1 <2 6 <1 0.36 82 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 11 -Dec -12 0.49 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 18 -Dec -12 0.66 <1 <2 4 <1 0.22 MPR -447 117 Ave. @ 210 St. 24 -Dec -12 0.59 <1 NA 3 <1 0.23 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 3 -Jan -12 0.62 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 10 -Jan -12 0.49 <1 2 5 <1 0.29 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 17 -Jan -12 0.37 <1 <2 3 <1 0.41 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 24 -Jan -12 0.77 <1 2 3 <1 0.28 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 31 -Jan -12 0.89 <1 2 3 <1 0.29 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 7 -Feb -12 0.98 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 14 -Feb -12 0.92 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 21 -Feb -12 0.62 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 28 -Feb -12 0.88 <1 2 3 <1 0.29 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 6 -Mar -12 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 13 -Mar -12 0.69 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 20 -Mar -12 0.67 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 27 -Mar -12 0.78 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 3 -Apr -12 0.73 <1 <2 7 <1 0.28 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 10 -Apr -12 0.99 <1 2 6 <1 0.3 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 17 -Apr -12 0.31 <1 <2 8 <1 0.25 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 24 -Apr -12 0.46 <1 <2 9 <1 0.25 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 1 -May -12 0.34 <1 <2 10 <1 0.26 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 8 -May -12 0.54 <1 <2 9 <1 0.38 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 15 -May -12 0.71 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 22 -May -12 0.62 <1 <2 11 <1 0.24 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 29 -May -12 0.62 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28 83 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 5 -Jun -12 0.52 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 12 -Jun -12 0.56 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 19 -Jun -12 0.55 <1 <2 11 <1 0.3 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 26 -Jun -12 0.61 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 3 -Jul -12 0.44 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 10 -Jul -12 0.36 <1 2 12 <1 0.28 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 17 -Jul -12 0.58 <1 2 13 <1 0.2 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 24 -Jul -12 0.29 <1 <2 14 <1 0.2 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 31 -Jul -12 0.4 <1 <2 13 <1 0.32 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 7 -Aug -12 0.37 <1 4 13 <1 0.27 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 14 -Aug -12 0.44 <1 <2 14 <1 0.3 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 21 -Aug -12 0.33 <1 <2 14 <1 0.3 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 28 -Aug -12 0.34 <1 4 14 <1 0.23 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 4 -Sep -12 0.43 <1 <2 13 <1 0.29 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 11 -Sep -12 0.47 <1 <2 14 <1 0.24 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 18 -Sep -12 0.43 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 25 -Sep -12 0.6 <1 <2 15 <1 0.24 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 2 -Oct -12 0.87 <1 <2 15 <1 0.14 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 9 -Oct -12 0.67 <1 <2 12 <1 0.31 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 16 -Oct -12 0.59 <1 <2 12 <1 0.45 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 23 -Oct -12 0.52 <1 <2 10 <1 1.2 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 30 -Oct -12 0.52 <1 <2 10 <1 0.87 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 6 -Nov -12 0.43 <1 <2 10 <1 0.6 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 13 -Nov -12 0.58 <1 <2 7 <1 0.48 84 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Sample name Sample reported name Sampled date Chlorine Free mg/L Ecoli MF/ 100mL HPC CFU/mL Temp. °C Total Coliform MF/100mL Turbidity NTU MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 20 -Nov -12 0.53 <1 <2 8 <1 0.44 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 27 -Nov -12 0.65 <1 <2 7 <1 0.37 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 4 -Dec -12 0.49 <1 <2 6 <1 0.38 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 11 -Dec -12 0.51 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 18 -Dec -12 0.6 <1 <2 5 <1 0.22 MPR -448 248th St. & McClure 24 -Dec -12 0.73 <1 NA 3 <1 0.16 85 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Appendix I: 2013 Capital Project Locations Barnston-Maple Ridge Pump Station and associated water mains near Lougheed and 200 Street (by Metro Vancouver) River Road at 236 Street Seismic Upgrade Program - various locations Water Security Improvements - various locations Water Main Replacement Program • 123 Ave west of 203 Street • Lane south of Lougheed Hwy between 223 and 224 streets • 210 Street between 116 and 117 Ave • 125 Ave between 241 and 243 Streets Additional information on construction projects is available at www.mapleridge.ca Installation of Water Main Tie -Ins near Kanaka Creek 86 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 Appendix J: Drinking Water and Those with Weakened Immune Systems 87 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 ,k Hera lt in NmiSe r 56 August 2009 Drinking Water and Those with Weakened Immune Systems Swie peopL with ver} w-ak immune systems rhav beat higher risk of Water -torr ■it ctinns. This file provides information akhout how to help prevent weser-firma infections_ People who have significa]rsty'Awkerred immune systems and who are al higher risk rrfcertain water.[ omR diseases include! • T'e pte with HIV infection who have a C04-- count of< 100 alis,mm'. • P opte with hemalohagical malisnaneies l lymphoma yr teuk,amia l. '40 are being aeLively mated or have been in remission and off nearrner t for less than 1 attar_ • E leriraaivoietic stem cell a ritsplaits rrripieaits. • Perrple born with thsease5 that sev teLy bffeet their immune s seems. Syme people with weakened immune svxters, such ns theme with certain tops of Capledr5 or raking t`ermin media' axions. Tem not heat higher nsk o Fse ere wrier-harne disease- These people do not newt to take extra precausiuirs with their drinking eater. 1c ,your docsor or specialist hnw wreak your Ormune s}Stem i 5. and w hedrer you tread so mke extra precautions. Diseases from drinking water Dmr king inter Can cOnra irk different or&anisms, Inc Lud]ng bacteria, anises and moires, which can rause disease- These organisms can exist irl The soave twice Rich SS laity 1.4lirbET aid surxive through treatment, or 'hey can utter she wager suppa;y iut rite distribution IVel I wn [e r can be contaminated if the wcLl is not bu ill properly or if it draws an wrier from the surface of The ground. such ns shallow. welts or wells drilled of fractured rock_ Sirt'arc water_ such as revers, lakes 2r11d siresms. i.ri alae] contain disease using orpiiisins leapt animal Feces, if you' have a. weak immune sy teii . you should not drink water from surface source's or wells potentially eorltantinated by surface water (For example. dug wells), unless the water has beer] [reeled b remove or inaetivate J Least 99.9%, of parasites (prorozoa , 99-99% or viruses and FO(]94 of harrnFu I bacteria_ Floss community wailer systems i1i B.C. have eirerEwe trcement_ sch as diisinkctima or chlorination. agalrliff hacierta and viruses. However, in rri8rig cases, treatment may (1ol provide a 99.9% rcduc Lion Ln infectious pa ratites, furthermore, scarce water s}.tems and many private -applies have no. [tiro at ail. lithe waxer }You drink lies res been d�srn tfirtecL please rettr to lleaLibLink BC 91e X915 How t. i DiAinfecr (drinking Wager, To further treat tinnking water that has been disinfected, collUder the merlinds I isted below. Options for wroth r treatment RoII r g: 11'yew waTer s pp Iy is disiiffecsed You need only bring the. water to a full boil to mare :ate am Cryprasporlariang parasites - a err nr chem for i mmenocon1prontised ptvple. as them is no -ffiecikAlthhilmElm for this parasite_ [f she water i nor yet disinfected., it's recommended Linn 1.1: IC IcI a 6,1 I] heal k)r at lea Sr cress minim. as the heST Was Dir kin or lnaeulate bacteria, viruses and parastles_ 88 District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2012 eFevaaioia over 2010 meters [6.540 feat]. you should boil wirer for at least two. ..urates b disrn lett 11 hi this situation, you should Hot drink or case tap .water w brush your teeth, rinse your mouth, mix drinks or mater Ear tabes without boiling it frr5t. If you are preparing infant fonmrula, please sir Health Link BC File ff69b Formula Feeding Yont Baby: Safely Preparing and Saoruifi Formula. Please note that bailing wailer wit I get rid of ti it ises. bacteria a rid parasites but not chemicals which may be �s�u�rd in the writer- For more information. ase contact the environmental health officer cr drinking water officer al our rrarelt public health unit_ Filters: ] F plan to install a drinkin a w<i le r IaErer in your home, you will need a sysEern labrledi as "Absulu[t' C micron Qrsma]lrr_ Brut Labeled as miring ANS ENSF tnIen]aaiortal Stannard E53 for rein oaa1 trf parasites- These IRV suirable for rem w irng Lecter'. and } i rises tr',d thou Idnot be used the witer uippEy is at (cast disinfected fiat. Jug -type fitters, which salt in a jug and allow water ao rrirkle through. and sOmr asp- maunled and built-in devices are amt an appropriate solution_ The jug filter models are nix effective ill rentioving many disease- IN.using organisms_ Rcvcrsr Osmosis (RO l' RO rs a ctive aping all disease -causing organisms. and rrtianE_a chemical contaminants. Unless it has a high •CllpliCity, it my produce Il amour L oi' water and %%al sae a large valtliiie, waif, to a wester treatment specialist to sce if this is the best option Carr krtu. UIr viakt 1J 'I Treitrncnt; LTV IIX11t wilI kill rrwrny disease -causing organisms, and it is effective against almost all parasites. UV will not kill sdlrtle I>acierial spires and sine viru,ses, so it should nrrt be u d wrirem tit? shier supply is at least disinfected.. UV treatment urats ahou6d meet NSF Standard i55rA. Bottled oratet If you do. no. want to drink water from the tap, wnu. may also choose to lit, boated water that has been treated adequately. MICISf bowled vr�rer in B_C_ has had RO treatment* but not ail iris been treated. You should check with the walcr border Ire find i}ut'fiat tirnt rent rt has had. You can still use tap water for Looking as long as ).1:11.3 b431 it. V'11311 ran use bottled water treated by reverse osmosis For drirtking_ brushing teeth; making ice rubes and for recipes where water is used bin not boiled such as cold soups (33 -salad dressing_ Far more inforrnsr t,duti lag the level of treatment in your local watersystem. please contar:I your dnnking Water ori yor r r suppt ier or file look eflvironanerual health O fiker or driirking water CaCer. Pease also Fee the following Health Link BC Files, ▪ Water•lricne Diseases in EJB' e -Pitta How to Disan leo I?nnkrng k ale r For more Het hLirlk RC I t i , Ml sit wrrw;HtalAt LLI ElC.cvilmAlt lkivj I ex sur or your local public health unit. Click on fd i1Lnkiics, gr c II 8-1-t for r on-ern$rgentry heat, inrorma1ion a ad ea rdic.e6 in 8_C. For dear anti assistance_ caII 7-1-1 tri f3.C. Translation services are available In more Matti 130 languages on request. 111,11 im u ni7e CCE ar rrnl•r I • I}1,r ■ir Conk ul 89 MAPLE 11IOOE krnl.h CaLumhi■ District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 17, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: E02-010-161 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Award of Contract ITT-EN13-36: 122 Avenue Road and Drainage Improvements (221 Street to 222 Street) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 122 Avenue Road Improvements Project from 216 Street to 224 Street is in the District's approved Capital Program as a multi-year, phased project. The project objectives are to improve multi -modal transportation for the corridor by providing improvements to pedestrian and cycling facility, and provide traffic calming measures with curb extensions and traffic buttons. The project scope of the current phase consists of concrete curb and gutter and asphalt multi -use path on both sides of the roadway, storm sewers, catch basins and lawn basins, three traffic buttons (small traffic circles), curb extensions, and new pavement markings. Overall the project aims at improving walkability, traffic safety and cycling mobility. Due to funding constraints, the project was split into three phases; Phase 1 from 216 Street to 221 Street was completed last year. Phase 2 from 221 to 222 Street is anticipated to be completed this year. Phase 3 will be the portion from 222 Street to 224 Street and is scheduled for design in 2013 and construction in 2014. Phase 2 of the project from 221 Street to 222 Street generally consists of roadway excavation and construction of concrete curb and gutter, asphalt multi -use pathway, milling and asphalt pavement, pavement markings and approximately 115m of 300mm diameter storm sewer. Phase 2 contract was tendered on May 21, 2013 and closed on June 11, 2013. The tender prices exceeded the available funds. The tender price included the installation of streetlights as a provisional item and was removed from the contract. However even with the streetlights removed from the contract, the budget allotted for the project is less than the adjusted tendered price thus additional funding of $195,000 is required to complete the project. The total project costs are estimated at $592,372 including all design and construction costs and the available funds are only $400,000. The construction of the project is anticipated to commence in early July 2013 and anticipated to be completed in approximately 8 weeks with substantial completion before school commences in September 2013. Council approval to award the contract is required for the work to proceed and meet the Fisheries window construction requirements and substantial completion before school starts in September. 1109 RECOMMENDATION: THAT Contract ITT-EN13-36, 122 Avenue Road and Drainage Improvements (221 to 222 Street), be awarded to Imperial Paving Ltd. in the amount of $525,897 excluding taxes and provisional items; and THAT the Financial Plan be amended, and THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The 122 Avenue Road Improvements project identified a need to improve the facilities on this route for pedestrians and cycling so as to promote the use of other modes of transportation. There have also been comments about speeding on this roadway resulting in the traffic calming measures installed in 2012 as part of Phase 1. Phase 2 of the project involves construction of concrete curb and gutter and a 3.Om wide asphalt multi -use path on both sides of 122 Avenue from 221 Street to 222 Street for a total length of approximately 300 meters to match the existing multi -use path of Phase 1 completed last year. A new section of storm sewer east of 221 Street is also required along with catch basins and lawn basins. The contract for the 122 Avenue Road and Drainage Improvements (221 Street to 222 Street) was tendered on May 21, 2013. The tender price included the installation of streetlights as a provisional item. The tender closed on June 11, 2013 and eight compliant tenders were received ranging from $716,417.00 to $1,049,454.00 Tender Evaluation: The following eight tenders received are listed in order from lowest to highest price: Imperial Paving Ltd. G & E Contracting LP Triahn Enterprises Ltd. Mission Contractors Ltd. Jack Cewe Ltd. TAG Construction Ltd. Strohmaier's Excavating Ltd. Capilano Highway Services Tender Price (excluding taxes) *$ 716,417.00 $ 755,655.25 *$ 815,572.00 *$ 813,893.04 *$ 839,710.00 $ 837,560.00 $ 958,674.60 $ 999,480.00 Adjusted Tender Price (excluding taxes) $ 525,897.00 $ 532,601.12 $ 584,309.00 $ 619,104.80 $ 622,830.00 $ 648,590.00 $ 705,062.60 $ 771,690.00 *Note: These tender totals were revised from tender opening to reflect arithmetic corrections. The installation of streetlights was a provisional item that was removed from the contract resulting in the adjusted lowest contract price of $525,897.00 from Imperial Paving Ltd. Imperial Paving Ltd. was the contractor for the Phase 1 of this project, from 216 Street to 221 Street. Staff have confirmed that the Imperial Paving Ltd. tender is compliant with tender requirements and the contractor is suitably qualified for the works. b) Desired Outcome: Council approval to award the contract for the 122 Avenue Road and Drainage Improvements (221 Street to 222 Street) project is required in order to construct the works within the Fisheries window (August 1 to September 15) and ensure substantial completion before school starts in September. c) Strategic Alignment: The 122 Avenue Road Improvements Project supports the following key strategies identified in the District's Strategic Plan: Maintain and enhance a multi -modal transportation system within Maple Ridge to provide citizens with safe, efficient alternatives for the movement of individuals and goods Promote alternative modes (pedestrian, bike, public transit) of travel to reduce reliance on the automobile d) Citizen/Customer Implications: There have been three Open Houses hosted for this project. Due to funding constraints the construction was split into three phases; Phase 1 (from 216 Street to 221 Street) was constructed in 2012; Phase 2, from 221 Street to 222 Street to be completed this summer upon Council Approval and Phase 3, from 222 Street to 224 Street is scheduled to be designed in 2013 and constructed in 2014. The estimated construction duration for Phase 2 is approximately 8 weeks, starting in early July through August 2013. It is anticipated that the the work zone will be reduced to single lane alternating traffic, but the road should stay open at all times. e) Interdepartmental Implications: The Operations Department has provided input to the design. f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Streetlights were added as a provisional item in this tender but the overall cost exceeded available funding and is therefore removed from this contract. However even with the streetlights removed from the contract, the budget allotted for the project is less than the tendered price thus additional funding of $195,000 is required to complete the project. The total project costs are estimated at $592,372 including all design and construction costs and the available funds are only $400,000. The project funding of $400,000 was added at 2012 year end process through committing $85,000 from gaming revenues and $315,000 from annual surplus. An additional $195,000 is required to adequately fund the project and will be comprised of $100,000 from Accumulated Surplus and $95,000 from the Capital Works Reserve. The projected expenditures are as follows; 2013 Contract Cost Consultant fees Contingency (10%) Total Projected Project Cost CONCLUSIONS: $ 525,897 $ 13,875 $ 52,589 $ 592,372 The tender price of $525,897.00 excluding taxes and optional items (streetlights from 216 Street to 222 Street); by Imperial Paving Ltd. for the 122 Avenue Road and Drainage Improvements (221 Street to 222 Street) is the lowest tendered price. It is recommended that Council approve the award of the contract to Imperial Paving Ltd. "Original signed by Maria Guerra" Prepared by: Maria Guerra, PEng., PMP Senior Project Engineer "Original signed by David Pollock" Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng. Municipal Engineer "Original signed by Trevor Thompson" Financial Trevor Thompson, CGA Review by: Manager of Financial Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. General Manager: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by Paul Gill" for Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer MG MAPLE RIDGE aril rah Columbia District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 17, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: EO2-010-155 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Award of Contract ITT-EN13-40: Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path (Laity Street to 216 Street) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path Project from Laity Street to 216 Street was included in the District's Capital Program in 2012. The project objectives are to improve multi -modal transportation for the corridor by providing an improved to pedestrian and cycling facility. The Lougheed Multi -Use Path was identified in the District of Maple Ridge Cycle Route Map as a separated cycle track from 117 Avenue and Laity Street to 216 Street to improve east -west connectivity. Due to funding constraints, the project did not commence in 2012 and staff has since acquired additional grants and funding from Bicycle Infrastructure Capital Cost Sharing (BICCS) and Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (MOTI) Gateway Cycling Program. The Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path project extends from Laity Street to 216 Street for a distance of approximately 635 metres. The work generally consists of construction of concrete curb and gutter, asphalt multi -use path, pathway lighting, pavement markings, retaining wall, 9O0mm and 105Omm diameter culvert extensions, instream works at McKenny Creek for the retaining wall, and approximately 165m of 45Omm diameter and 116m of 375mm diameter storm sewer. The tender includes a provisional item, Part 2- Lougheed Highway and Laity Street Intersection Improvements that the District is seeking to cost share with MOTI. As the total contract costs exceed the available budget, the provisional item has been removed from the contract resulting in the adjusted lowest contract price of $877,693.52 from Mission Contractors Ltd. The remaining $226,270.60 provisional item can be awarded to Mission Contractors Ltd. should a cost sharing agreement with MOTI be finalized. The tender price excluding the provisional item is within budget and construction is anticipated to commence in July 2013 and anticipated to be completed in approximately 12 weeks. AMEC, the District's Engineering Consultant has analyzed the tenders and has confirmed that the Mission Contractors Ltd. tender is compliant and that the contractor's qualifications are satisfactory. Council approval to award the contract is required for the work to proceed and meet the fisheries window construction requirements. 1110 RECOMMENDATION: THAT Contract ITT-EN13-40, Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path (Laity Street to 216 Street), be awarded to Mission Contractors Ltd. in the amount of $887,693.52 excluding taxes and provisional item; and THAT the provisional work as noted to a value of $226,270.60 be approved subject to securing grant funding from MOTI; and THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path project was identified to improve pedestrian and cycling facilities in order to promote multi -modal transportation options. The Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path will improve the east -west cycle route connectivity. In the summer of 2012, AMEC completed the design of the Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path Project and prepared a construction cost estimate. The estimated cost exceeded the project budget and therefore did not proceed to the tender stage. Staff applied for, and acquired grants from BICCS and MOTI Gateway Cycling Program. Additional funding for the project was also budgeted and approved by Council in the 2013 Capital Budget. The tender drawings and documents were updated and the project was tendered on May 21, 2013. The work generally consists of construction of concrete curb and gutter, asphalt multi -use path, pathway lighting, pavement markings, retaining wall, 900mm and 1050mm diameter culvert extensions, instream works at McKenney Creek for the widening for the Multi -Use Path, and approximately 165m of 450mm diameter and 116m of 375mm diameter storm sewer. The tender closed on June 11, 2013 and four compliant tenders were received ranging from $1,103,964.11 to $1,197,614.35. Tender Evaluation: The following four tenders received are listed in order from lowest to highest price: Mission ContractorsLtd. Strohmaier's Excavating Ltd. Imperial Paving Ltd. Wilco Civil Inc. Tender Price (excluding taxes) *$1,103,964.11 $1,107,962.25 $1,118,810.40 $1,197,614.35 Adjusted Tender Price (excluding taxes & provisional item) $877,693.52 $930,533.42 $912,336.00 $989,437.50 *Note: These tender totals were revised from tender opening to reflect arithmetic corrections. The tender includes a provisional item, Part 2- Lougheed Highway and Laity Street Intersection Improvements that will be cost shared with MOTI. The provisional item may be removed from the contract resulting in the adjusted lowest contract price of $877,693.52 from Mission Contractors Ltd. and the remaining $226,270.60 provisional item can be awarded to Mission Contractors Ltd. once the cost sharing agreement with MOTI is finalized. Mission Contractors Ltd. has previously completed capital projects in the District, namely the 216 Street and 128 Avenue Drainage Improvement, on budget and on time. AMEC has confirmed that the Mission Contractors Ltd. tender is compliant with tender requirements and the contractor is suitably qualified for the works. b) Desired Outcome: Council approval to award the contract for the Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path (Laity Street to 216 Street) project is required in order to construct the project including the works at McKenney Creek within the Fisheries window (August 1 to September 15). c) Strategic Alignment: The Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path (Laity Street to 216 Street) Project supports the following key strategies identified in the District's Strategic Plan: Maintain and enhance a multi -modal transportation system within Maple Ridge to provide citizens with safe, efficient alternatives for the movement of individuals and goods Promote alternative modes (pedestrian, bike, public transit) of travel to reduce reliance on the automobile d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The estimated construction duration is approximately 12 weeks, starting in mid-July to September 2013. It is anticipated that traffic through Lougheed Highway will be reduced to single lane alternating west bound during construction. e) Interdepartmental Implications: The Operations Department has provided input to the design. f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path Project is funded under LTC 2317 and LTC 8559, with a total budget of $1,200,000 including $758,831 from grants. The tender cost of the project excluding the provisional item is within the approved budget. The $226,270.60 provisional item will be cost shared with MOTI. Once the cost sharing with MOTI for the provisional item is finalized, staff will utilize the remaining budget to complete the provisional items. The projected expenditures are within budget. Construction Cost (excluding provisional items) $ 877,693 Consultant fees $ 98,000 Landscaping $ 35,000 Contingency (5%) 43,000 Total Projected Project Cost $ 1,053,693 An annual estimated operating budget of $5,000 is required for maintenance of the landscaped boulevard and will be included in the upcoming Business Plan discussions. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that Council approve the award of the lowest adjusted tender price of $887,693.52 excluding taxes and provisional item with the provision to award the remaining $226,270.60, once cost sharing with MOTI is finalized to by Mission Contractors Ltd. for Lougheed Highway Multi -Use Path (Laity Street to 216 Street). "Origial signed by Maria Guerra" Prepared by: Maria Guerra, PEng. Senior Project Engineer "Original signed by David Pollock" Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng. Municipal Engineer "Original signed by Trevor Thompson" Financial Trevor Thompson, CGA Review by: Manager of Financial Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. General Manager: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by Paul Gill" Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer 4I MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: June 17, 2013 and Members of Council Committee of the Whole FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Disbursements for the month ended May 31, 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The disbursements summary for the past period is attached for information. All voucher payments are approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor and a Finance Manager. Council authorizes the disbursements listing through Council resolution. Expenditure details are available by request through the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION: That the disbursements as listed below for the month ended May 31, 2013 now be approved. GENERAL $ 5,651,034 PAYROLL $ 2,355,903 PURCHASE CARD $ 115.370 $ 8,122,307 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan. b) Community Communications: The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial disbursements. 1131 c) Business Plan / Financial Implications: Highlights of larger items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution • G.V. Water District - Water consumption Jan 30 to Feb 26/13 $ 401,868 • Property Owners - Land acquisitions - 128 Ave road dedication $ 225,819 d) Policy Implications: Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice. CONCLUSIONS: The disbursements for the month ended May 31, 2013 have been reviewed and are in order. "Original signed by G'Ann Rygg" Prepared by: G'Ann Rygg Accounting Clerk II "Original signed by Trevor Thompson" Approved by: Trevor Thompson, BBA, CGA Manager of Financial Planning "Original signed by Paul Gill" Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, CGA GM - Corporate & Financial Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer gmr VENDOR NAME 0906112 BC Ltd 899979 BC Ltd 946235 BC Ltd Advanced Drive Systems Inc Aparc Systems Ltd BC Hydro BC SPCA BFI Canada Vancouver CUPE Local 622 Capilano Highway Services Chevron Canada Ltd Columbia Bitulithic Ltd Crown Contracting Limited ESRI Canada Limited Fitness Edge Flynn Canada Ltd FortisBC - Natural Gas Fred Surridge Ltd G6 Ventures (Village Green)Ltd Greater Vanc Water District Guillevin International Inc IDRS Jaskar Developments Ltd Mageta Holdings Ltd Manulife Financial Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council Medical Services Plan Microserve Morrey Nissan Sales Municipal Pension Plan BC Newlands Lawn & Garden Mainten Open Storage Solutions Inc Pitt River Quarries Ltd Pivotal Development Consultant Premier Pacific Seeds Ltd Property Owners Raincity Janitorial Sery Ltd CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - MAY 2013 DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT Security refund Security refund Roadside mowing Pump station upgrades Electric vehicle charging stations Electricity Contract payment May Community Animal Centre development - 50% share Waste disposal Mar & Apr Dues - pay periods 13/09 & 13/10 126 Ave watermain replacement Gasoline & Diesel fuel Roadworks material Traffic signal upgrade - 216 St & DTR Annual software support Fitness classes & programs RCMP roof replacement Natural gas Waterworks supplies Security refund Water consumption Jan 30 - Feb 26/13 Fire fighters' equipment Fire fighters' protective wear Facilities electrical supplies Operations electrical supplies Tax notice mailing Security refund Security refund Employee benefits premiums Arts Centre contract payment May Program revenue Apr Theatre rental & catering Employee medical & health premiums Mitel software maintenance Online Building Inspection Oracle to SQL migration VMware software maintenance Two Nissan Frontier pickup trucks Employee benefits premiums Grass cutting NetApp software maintenance Roadworks material Security refund Grass seed Land acquisitions - 128 Ave road dedication Janitorial services & supplies: 27,527 1,704 5,802 554 4,531 6,675 49,889 7,595 152 1,134 2,257 2,526 14,837 AMOUNT 333,376 667,257 16,884 16,229 40,069 122,682 29,231 17,722 23,843 15,813 80,353 37,510 63,446 63,840 32,095 61,585 17,846 30,391 100,000 401,868 17,562 19,856 76,892 18,000 134,660 57,636 35,450 20,754 44,381 526,822 19,236 17,294 16,930 76,892 27,410 225,819 Raybern Erectors Ltd Receiver General For Canada RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ridge Meadows Youth & Justice Ridgemeadows Recycling Society Softchoice Corp Urban Systems Warrington PCI Management West Coast Nissan Ltd Westview Sales Ltd Disbursements In Excess $15,000 Disbursements Under $15,000 Total Payee Disbursements Payroll Purchase Cards - Payment Total Disbursements May 2013 Firehalls Leisure Centre Library Municipal Hall Operations Pitt Meadows Family Rec. Centre Randy Herman Building RCMP South Bonson Community Centre Ruskin Park sports field fencing Fencing repairs - various locations Employer/Employee remit PP13/09 & PP13/10 Ice rental Apr Curling rink operating expenses Mar 2013 funding Monthly contract for recycling May Weekly recycling Litter pickup contract Recycling station pickup Network appliances & support Traffic calming Transportation plan update Advance for Tower common costs Three Nissan Leaf vehicles Meter boxes & storm sewer covers PP13/09, PP13/10 & PP13/11 6,222 1,108 6,022 2,935 2,954 1,097 4,348 3,112 4,716 18,475 5,590 52,040 5,146 106,784 451 1,787 319 2,421 32,299 GMR \\mr.corp\docs\Fin\05-Finance\1630-Accts-Payable\01-General\AP Disbursements\2013\[Monthly_Council_Report_2013.xlsx]MAY'13 32,514 24,065 731,289 57,186 20,000 109,341 16,731 34,720 60,000 89,182 25,679 4,708,340 942,694 5,651,034 2,355,903 115,370 8,122,307 MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: June 17, 2013 and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole 2013 Residential Class Property Taxation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Throughout the year, the Finance Department provides a series of financial reports. These reports provide Council with information to assist in their decision making. In January, a detailed analysis of 2013 property assessments was presented. Recently, Council received information on our 2012 year-end financial statements and a detailed report and presentation on our financial reserves. The purpose of this report is to provide Council with information on municipal taxes assessed to Class 1 -Residential. This is important as most of the District's assessment base is represented by properties in this class. It is also important to keep in mind that this report focuses on the municipal portion of property taxes because the levies by other jurisdictions are beyond Council's control. In our analysis, we have looked at three indicators: 1. Residential Class Tax Rates Comparison We looked at the tax rate the District charges to the Residential Class to see how it has changed from last year, and to see how it compares to others in the region. Our tax rate increased 4.8% from 2012, which consists of the Council approved property tax increase in the Financial Plan Bylaw and an adjustment to negate market changes in assessed values. This is because for 2013, Residential Class property assessments decreased in market value by approximately 1%, and the tax rate was adjusted to generate the funding required in the Financial Plan. Of the surveyed municipalities, three municipalities saw decreases in their tax rates and the remaining thirteen had increases. Decreases ranged from a high of 6.9% in West Vancouver to a low of 0.8% in Delta, while increases ranged from a high of 6.1% in Richmond to a low of 0.1% in New Westminster. 2. Assessment and Taxation Changes on Sample Properties We have been tracking the change in assessments and taxation on eight properties for several years, and a spreadsheet showing this information is included in this report. 3. Municipal Property Taxes and Utilities Assessed Against the `Average Single Family Dwelling' Survey We conducted a survey of the municipal property taxes and utilities assessed against the `average single family dwelling'. The data allows us to see how the taxes and utilities assessed in Maple Ridge compare to others in the region. It is interesting to note that our taxes remain amongst the lowest in the region and when the taxes are combined with annual utility rates, Maple Ridge ranks as being 1132 fourth lowest among the municipalities surveyed. We also looked at the municipal property taxes payable for the average single family dwelling in Maple Ridge to see how it has changed from 2011, and to see how it compares to others in the region. For the average single family dwelling in Maple Ridge, the municipal property taxes increased 5.2% from 2011 to 2012, and 4.1% from 2012 to 2013. This ranks as being average or just slightly above average when compared to the surveyed municipalities. RECOMMENDATION: This report has been provided for information only. No resolution is required. DISCUSSION: For 2013 assessed values, BC Assessment continued with their regular practice of assessing properties (land and buildings) based on market value as of July 1 of the previous year. This means that for 2013, properties are assessed at what their market value would have been on July 1, 2012. In Maple Ridge, Residential Class property assessments decreased in market value by approximately 1%, and the tax rate was adjusted to generate the funding required in the Financial Plan. 1. Residential Tax Rates Comparison: Figure 1 shows the Residential Property Class municipal tax rates and the percentage change from 2012 to 2013, and 2011 to 2012 for the surveyed municipalities. In the surveyed municipalities, from 2012 to 2013, three municipalities saw decreases in their tax rates, with the remaining thirteen seeing increases. Decreases ranged from a high of 6.9% in West Vancouver to a low of 0.8% in Delta, while increases ranged from a high of 6.1% in Richmond to a low of 0.1% in New Westminster. The wide range in tax rates changes is largely a function of the change in assessed values. Maple Ridge's tax rate increased 4.8% from 2012. Page 2 of 8 Figure 1: Residential Class 1 Municipal Property Tax Rates and Percentage Changes from 2011 Municipality 2013 Rate Change 2012 Rate Change 2011 Rate West Vancouver 1.68850 -6.9% 1.81450 -12.7% 2.07900 Vancouver 1.89502 -6.2% 2.02002 -5.1% 2.12815 Richmond 2.12246 6.1% 2.00128 -7.4% 2.16085 Burnaby 2.24190 0.4% 2.23260 -6.1% 2.37710 North Vancouver District 2.36961 0.2% 2.36446 -4.4% 2.47291 Surrey 2.37908 1.0% 2.35469 -1.0% 2.37807 North Vancouver City 2.44972 2.9% 2.38015 -0.4% 2.38906 Coquitlam 3.05600 0.9% 3.02810 -0.7% 3.04860 Langley Township 3.27430 2.3% 3.19978 2.2% 3.12939 Port Moody 3.40150 2.8% 3.30760 2.9% 3.21450 Delta 3.46753 -0.8% 3.49470 0.2% 3.48823 New Westminster 3.54830 0.1% 3.54410 -1.9% 3.61310 Port Coquitlam 3.82240 2.9% 3.71290 1.2% 3.66900 Pitt Meadows 3.90660 4.9% 3.72580 4.0% 3.58140 Maple Ridge 4.28330 4.8% 4.08880 4.9% 3.89780 Mission 4.68110 1.3% 4.62120 0.9% 4.58210 2. Assessment and Taxation Changes on Sample Properties: Figure 2 shows the assessments and taxes for eight properties in Maple Ridge; we have been tracking this data for several years. This analysis shows the variability in taxes and assessment changes across the municipality. In 2013, none of the sample property assessed values increased. Half of the sample properties experienced decreases, with the property in Area #7, Lower Hammond, decreasing 9.9%. Taxes for the half of the sample properties that saw no changes in assessed value increased 4.2%. The Area #7, Lower Hammond property taxes decreased 6.0%. It is important to note that while some properties may experience the same percentage tax increase, the tax bills will vary and depend on the assessed value. Page 3 of 8 Figure 2: Sample Properties History of Assessed Values and Property Taxation Assessed Values Location 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1 Silver Valley 493,000 742,000 722,000 703,000 656,000 746,000 787,000 787,000 2 Albion/Kanaka 393,000 449,000 516,000 516,000 489,000 544,000 544,000 507,000 3 Whonnock 380,000 423,000 532,000 532,000 487,000 518,000 532,000 532,000 4 Central MR 289,100 340,000 387,000 387,000 384,000 418,000 420,000 407,000 5 Central MR -strata 210,800 234,200 262,600 262,600 236,500 243,000 229,000 222,000 6 West MR 425,000 476,000 562,000 562,000 579,000 610,000 597,000 597,000 7 Lower Hammond 182,300 201,100 239,600 239,600 224,300 219,100 219,300 197,700 8 Upper Hammond 293,000 375,000 460,000 460,000 425,000 450,000 429,000 429,000 Total 2,666,200 3,240,300 3,681,200 3,662,200 3,480,800 3,748,100 3,757,300 3,678,700 Change in Assessed Values Location 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1 Silver Valley 12.8% 50.5% -2.7% -2.6% -6.7% 13.7% 5.5% 0.0% 2 Albion/Kanaka 5.9% 14.2% 14.9% 0.0% -5.2% 11.2% 0.0% -6.8% 3 Whonnock 6.8% 11.3% 25.8% 0.0% -8.5% 6.4% 2.7% 0.0% 4 Central MR -2.0% 17.6% 13.8% 0.0% -0.8% 8.9% 0.5% -3.1% 5 Central MR- strata 23.3% 11.1% 12.1% 0.0% -9.9% 2.7% -5.8% -3.1% 6 West MR -0.5% 12.0% 18.1% 0.0% 3.0% 5.4% -2.1% 0.0% 7 Lower Hammond -4.4% 10.3% 19.1% 0.0% -6.4% -2.3% 0.1% -9.9% 8 Upper Hammond 3.2% 28.0% 22.7% 0.0% -7.6% 5.9% -4.7% 0.0% Total 5.3% 21.5% 13.6% -0.5% -5.0% 7.7% 0.2% -2.09% Taxation (Municipal General/Drainage/Parks Location 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1 Silver Valley 1,925 2,576 2,303 2,342 2,370 2,660 2,919 3,042 2 Albion/Kanaka 1,534 1,559 1,646 1,719 1,767 1,940 2,018 1,960 3 Whonnock 1,483 1,469 1,697 1,772 1,759 1,847 1,973 2,056 4 Central MR 1,129 1,181 1,235 1,289 1,387 1,490 1,558 1,573 5 Central MR- strata 823 813 838 875 854 866 849 858 6 West MR 1,659 1,653 1,793 1,872 2,092 2,175 2,214 2,308 7LowerHammond 712 698 764 798 810 781 813 764 8 Upper Hammond 1,144 1,302 1,467 1,532 1,535 1,604 1,591 1,658 Total 10,409 11,251 11,743 12,199 12,574 13,363 13,935 14,219 Change in Taxation (Municipal General/Drainage/Parks) Location 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1 Silver Valley 10.8% 33.8% -10.6% 1.7% 1.2% 12.1% 9.6% 4.2% 2 Albion/Kanaka 4.0% 1.6% 5.6% 4.4% 2.8% 9.6% 3.9% -2.9% 3 Whonnock 4.9% -0.9% 15.5% 4.4% -0.7% 4.8% 6.7% 4.2% 4 Central MR -3.8% 4.6% 4.6% 4.4% 7.6% 7.3% 4.4% 1.0% 5 Central MR- strata 21.0% -1.2% 3.1% 4.4% -2.4% 1.3% -2.0% 1.1% 6 West MR -2.3% -0.4% 8.5% 4.4% 11.8% 3.8% 1.7% 4.2% 7 Lower Hammond -6.1% -2.0% 9.5% 4.5% 1.5% -3.7% 4.1% -6.0% 8 Upper Hammond 1.3% 13.8% 12.7% 4.4% 0.2% 4.4% -0.1% 4.2% Total 3.4% 8.1% 4.4% 3.9% 3.1% 6.1% 4.3% 2.0% Page 4 of 8 3. Municipal Property Taxes and Utilities Assessed Against the `Average Single Family Dwelling' Survey: The methodology used to calculate the value of an average single family dwelling uses information from BC Assessment. The difficulty in using this information is that an average single family dwelling in West Vancouver may be physically much different than an average single family dwelling in Maple Ridge, and this has not been taken into account. Additionally, municipalities provide different services at different levels and this has also not been taken into account. Nonetheless, this is a commonly used method and it does serve as one indicator of relative tax burden. Determining what an average value looks like can be complicated because the word 'average' can have different meanings, as follows: • 'Average Single family dwelling'. Single Family Dwelling is one category of BC Assessment's property classes. It is comprised of detached residences or houses. The 'average single family dwelling' value is determined by taking the value from this category on BC Assessment's Revised Roll and dividing that number by the number of occurrences in that category. This method arrives at an average value for this category that includes both market and nonmarket changes (new construction). • 'Average home' values are comprised of single family dwellings and multi -family units, such as townhouses and apartments. This was the methodology used in the Financial Overview Report provided to Council in December because this 'average home' value does not include nonmarket changes (new construction). • Other areas might look at other methodologies, including those that differentiate between market change and new construction to arrive at an 'average value'. These types of calculations are all commonly used methodologies. A different 'average value' will be arrived at by each of the methodologies. So that we are comparing like items between the surveyed municipalities, for the purposes of our survey for this report we have used the 'average single family dwelling' values. When we look at the average single family dwelling in Maple Ridge and take into consideration the changes in assessed values and the authorized increase to property tax revenues, these changes amount to a tax increase of approximately $77 to the 'average single family dwelling'. There were also increases to sewer, water and recycling rates. The aggregate impact of all these changes to the average single family dwelling in Maple Ridge is about $116 or 4.3%. These numbers are different than the information that Council received in the Financial Overview Report in December, because the value for an 'average single family dwelling' includes both market and nonmarket changes to assessed values whereas the 'average home value' in the Financial Overview Report does not. The difference in the methodology used to determine an average value in the average home/single family dwelling has resulted in a different average value being used to calculate the increase in charges. The data compiled is shown on Figure 3. It shows that the municipal portion of residential property taxes for the 'average single family dwelling' in Maple Ridge at $1,966 is amongst the lowest of those municipalities surveyed. When municipal taxes are combined with property utilities for a total of $2,822, Maple Ridge is still amongst the lowest of the surveyed municipalities. Page 5 of 8 Figure 3: Summary of Survey Results - 2013 'Average Single Family Dwelling' Municipality Surrey Langley -Township Pitt Meadows Average Assessed Value* 643,561 513,681 450,410 Municipal Taxes 1,719 1,682 1,760 Rank (lowest to highest) 2 1 3 Total Utilities 1,005 1,083 1,014 Municipal Rank Taxes & (lowest to Utilities highest) Notes 2,724 1 2,765 2 2,773 3 Maple Ridge 459,075 1,966 5 855 2,822 4 (10) Port Coquitlam Mission Richmond Delta North Vancouver -City Burnaby Coquitlam Vancouver Port Moody New Westminster North Vancouver -District West Vancouver Average Median Highest Lowest 528,935 392,820 971,675 608,208 891,975 949,826 702,105 1,297,000 760,622 695,743 1,016,052 2,144,137 814,114 698,924 2,144,137 392,820 2,022 1,839 2,062 2,122 2,185 2,129 2,146 2,458 2,587 2,469 2,408 3,620 2,198 2,126 3,620 1,682 6 4 7 8 11 9 10 13 15 14 12 16 899 1,109 913 930 908 1,002 1,137 1,067 962 1,145 1,413 1,334 1,049 1,009 1,413 855 2,921 2,948 2,976 3,052 3,093 3,132 3,283 3,525 3,550 3,614 3,820 4,954 3,247 3,073 4,954 2,724 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 (9) 13 (5) 14 (4) 15 16 (8) (3) (7) (2) (6) (1) Notes: All values have been rounded. * Average Assessed Value was determined by using BC Assessment's 2013 Revised Roll Totals, General Net Taxable Value Totals for the Residential Single Family Property Class divided by number of Occurrences. (1) Recycling/Garbage included in municipal taxes. Water & Sewer Rates reflect a 5% discount. (2) Municipal taxes are averaged. (3) Drainage Levy Rate/Amount excluded from this analysis. According to Mission staff, approximately 30 homes are charged this levy. (4,5) Recycling/Garbage, Water and Sewer Rates reflect a 5% discount. (6) Water and Sewer Rates reflect a 10% discount. (7,8) Utility rates reflect a 10% discount. (9) Land Assessment Averaging for eligible properties; redistribution of tax levy from non-residential to residential property classes. (10) Utility rates include Water, Sewer and Recycling. Page 6 of 8 In Figure 4, we look at the Municipal Property taxes for the average single family dwelling from the surveyed municipalities and show how this information has changed from 2011. In 2013, the total municipal taxes for the average single family dwelling in Maple Ridge at $1,966 ranks below the average of the total municipal property taxes for the surveyed municipalities, as it ranked in 2012 and 2011. It is interesting to note that even though the total municipal taxes payable for the average single family dwelling in Maple Ridge is below the average of the total municipal taxes payable for the surveyed municipalities, the percentage change in Maple Ridge is about average, or just slightly above average from year to year. There is some variability noted in the percentage changed from year to year with the surveyed municipalities. It is Council Policy in Maple Ridge to consider and smooth out the changes from year to year to make the changes in taxation fairly predictable. Figure 4: Residential Class 1 - Total Municipal Property Taxes and Percentage Changes from 2011 Municipality 2013 Municipal Change ge 2012 Municipal Taxes Change 2011 Municipal Taxes Langley Township 1,682 3.8% 1,621 3.3% 1,569 Surrey 1,719 6.5% 1,614 5.3% 1,532 Pitt Meadows 1,760 3.7% 1,697 5.2% 1,613 Mission 1,839 2.0% 1,803 0.3% 1,797 Maple Ridge 1,966 4.1% 1,890 5.2% 1,797 Port Coquitlam 2,022 3.8% 1,948 4.0% 1,874 Richmond 2,062 3.8% 1,988 10.5% 1,799 Delta 2,122 2.9% 2,061 3.3% 1,996 Burnaby 2,129 3.6% 2,055 8.3% 1,897 Coquitlam 2,146 4.8% 2,047 5.0% 1,950 North Vancouver City 2,185 6.5% 2,051 5.4% 1,946 North Vancouver District 2,408 2.8% 2,342 3.6% 2,260 Vancouver 2,458 4.4% 2,354 7.6% 2,188 New Westminster 2,469 5.5% 2,340 4.3% 2,244 Port Moody 2,587 6.4% 2,431 7.2% 2,267 West Vancouver 3,620 1.6% 3,564 2.4% 3,480 Average Median Highest Lowest 2,198 2,126 3,620 1,682 4.1% 3.8% 6.5% 1.6% 2,113 2,049 3,564 1,614 Page 7 of 8 5.1% 5.1% 10.5% 0.3% 2,013 1,922 3,480 1,532 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS For 2013, Council authorized a 2.25% increase for general taxes, a 0.5% increase for infrastructure sustainability, $300,000 plus growth for the Fire Services Improvement Levy, 0.125% for Parks and Recreation Improvements, and 0.3% for Drainage Improvements. The overall impact to the average single family dwelling's municipal -controlled levies, including recycling, water, sewer and recycling is about $116 or 4.3%. The information in this report allows Council to see how our taxes compare to our neighbours. CONCLUSION: The Finance Department provides Council with a series of reports to assist in their decisions. The purpose of this report is to provide information on the municipal taxes assessed against residential properties. We have looked at three indicators, and can conclude that the taxes assessed in Maple Ridge are well positioned when compared to our neighbours. "Original signed by Jacquie Bergmann" Prepared by: Jacquie Bergmann Research Technician "Original signed by Paul Gill" Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, CGA General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer :jgbb Page 8 of 8 MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia Deep hoots Greater Heights TO: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: June 17, 2013 And Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: 2012 Annual Report and 2012 Statement of Financial Information EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 2012 Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with Section 98 of the Community Charter and Municipal Council is required to formally receive this report before June 30. A major component of the report is the 2012 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. These statements were presented to Council at the April 22 Audit and Finance Committee meeting and Council passed a resolution formally accepting the statements at the April 23 Council meeting. The 2012 Annual Report will be submitted to the Government Finance Officers Association for consideration for the Canadian Award for Financial Reporting, an award the District has received for the past twenty two years. Under the Financial Information Act, the District is required to file a Statement of Financial Information with the Province of British Columbia prior to June 30 each year. This report must approved by Council and the Corporate Finance Officer. RECOMMENDATION: That the 2012 Annual Report be received as required by the Community Charter. That the Statement of Financial Information be approved as required by the Financial Information Act. DISCUSSION: The 2012 Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with Section 98 of the Community Charter. As required in the Charter, the report contains our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements; a Progress Report detailing municipal objectives and progress toward their achievement; a Development Cost Charges report showing collections and expenditures for each component; information about the services provided by Municipal Departments; and lists the Permissive Tax Exemptions awarded for the 2012 fiscal year. The report was made available for public inspection on June 11 and notice posted in the local newspaper as required by Section 94 of the Charter indicating that the report is being presented at the Council meeting of June 25. The District of Maple Ridge has been a recipient of the Canadian Award for Financial Reporting for the past twenty two years. This award is presented by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) to recognize Municipalities that publish high quality financial reports that are easily readable, efficiently organized and clearly communicate the government's financial picture. The 2012 Annual Report will be submitted to the GFOA for consideration for this year's award. In addition to the Annual Report required by the Community Charter, the District of Maple Ridge is required to publish an annual Statement of Financial Information (SOFI) under the Financial Information Act. This report must be approved by Council and the Corporate Finance Officer, and filed with the Province of British Columbia prior to June 30, 2013. Page 1 of 2 1133 The SOFI is attached for your review and approval. The package consists of: • A completed checklist • A statement of assets and liabilities • An operational statement • A schedule of debt • A schedule of guarantee and indemnity agreements • A schedule of remuneration and expenses • A schedule of disbursements to supplies of goods or services • A statement of cash flow • A statement of change in net financial assets • Notes to the financial statements • A statement of change in equity in capital assets • A statement of severance agreements • A statement of approval of the financial information submitted • A management report Citizen/Customer Implications: The Annual Report and the SOFI provide additional information to the residents of Maple Ridge and the general public, contributing to Council's commitment to transparency. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to June 30 of each year council is required to receive the District's Annual Report in accordance with Section 98 of the Community Charter and to approve the Statement of Financial Information in accordance with the Financial Information Act. It should be noted that a detailed presentation on our 2012 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements was provided at the April 22 Audit and Finance Committee meeting and Council passed a resolution formally accepting the statements at the April 23 Council meeting. The Statement of Financial Information is attached and the Annual Report is available for viewing on the District of Maple Ridge website. "original signed by Catherine Nolan" Prepared by: Catherine Nolan, CGA Manager of Accounting "original signed by Paul Gill" Approved by: Paul Gill, CGA GM: Corporate and Financial Services "original signed by Jim Rule" Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Page 2 of 2 MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE 2012 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION IPrint Form J Financial Information Act Financial Information Regulation (FIR), Schedule 1 Statement of Financial Information (SOFT) Index to FIR Schedule 1 and the Checklist Page 1: Corporation Information Ministry Information General: Section One 1(1)(a) Statement of assets and liabilities 1(1)(b) Operational statement 1(1)(c) Schedule of debts 1(1)(d) Schedule of guarantee and indemnity agreements 1(1)(e) Schedule of employee remuneration and expenses 1(1)(f) Schedule of suppliers of goods and services 1(2) [Explanatory information for reference] 1(3) Statements prepared on a consolidated basis or for each fund 1(4) & (5) Notes to the statements and schedules in section 1(1) Page 2: Statement of Assets & Liabilities: Section Two 2 Balance sheet Changes in equity and surplus or deficit Operational Statement: Section Three 3(1) Statement of Income / Statement of Revenue and Expenditures Statement of Changes in Financial Position 3(2) & (3) Omission of Statement of Changes in Financial Position, with explanation 3(4) Requirement for community colleges, school districts and municipalities Statement of Debts: Section Four 4(1)(a) & 4(2) List and detail the schedule of long-term debts 4(1)(b) Identify debts covered by sinking funds / reserves 4(3) & (4) Omission of schedule, with explanation Page 3: Schedule of Guarantee and Indemnity Agreements: Section Five 5(1) List agreements under the Guarantees and Indemnities Regulation 5(2) State the entities and amounts involved 5(3) & (4) Omission of schedule, with explanation Page 3 & 4: Schedule of Remuneration and Expenses: Section Six 6(1) [Definitions for reference] 6(2)(a) List remuneration / expenses for each elected official, member of board, Cabinet appointees 6(2)(b) List each employee with remuneration exceeding $75,000, plus expenses 6(2)(c) Consolidated total for all employees with remuneration of $75,000 or less 6(2)(d) Reconcile difference in total remuneration above with operational statement 6(3) Exclude personal information other than as required Index 1 Page 3 & 4: Schedule of Remuneration and Expenses: Section Six (continued) 6(4) & (5) 6(6) 6(7)(a) & (b) 6(8) 6(9) Page 4: Schedule of 7(1)(a) 7(1)(b) 7(1)(c) 7(2)(a) 7(2)(b) 7(2)(c) [Explanatory information for reference] Report employer portion of El and CPP as a supplier payment Statement of severance agreements Explain an omission of statement of severance agreements [Statement of severance agreements to minister — not required unless requested] Suppliers of Goods or Services: Section Seven List suppliers receiving payments exceeding $25,000 Consolidated total of all payments of $25,000 or less Reconcile difference in total above with operational statement [Explanatory information for reference] Statement of payments of grants or contributions [Explanatory information for reference] Page 5: Inactive Corporations: Section Eight 8(1) Ministry to report for inactive corporations 8(2)(a) 8(2)(b) Contents of report — statements and schedules under section 1(1) to extent possible Contents of report — operational status of corporation Approval of Financial Information: Section Nine 9(1) Approval of SOFT for corporations (other than municipalities) 9(2) Approval of SOFI for municipalities 9(3) Management report 9(4) Management report must explain roles and responsibilities 9(5) Signature approval is for all contents of the SOFI Access to the Financial Information: Section Ten 10(1) to (3) [Explanatory information for reference] Index 2 Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1 Checklist — Statement of Financial Information (SOFT) For the Corporation: Corporate Name: District of Maple Ridge Contact Name: Catherine Nolan Fiscal Year End: 2012 Date Submitted: June 26, 2013 For the Ministry: Ministry Name: Date Received: Date Reviewed: Approved (SFO): Distribution: Legislative Library Phone Number: E-mail: (604) 463-5221 cnolan@mapleridge.ca Reviewer: Deficiencies: Deficiencies Addressed: Further Action Taken: Ministry Retention Yes Item No No • ■ Yes 1 (1) (a) No ❑ 11 n El FIR Schedule 1 Section Item Yes No N/A Comments General 1 (1) (a) Statement of assets and liabilities Consolidated Statement of Financial Position n ■ ■ 1 (1) (b) Operational statement Statement of Operations a ■ iiConsolidated 1 (1) (c) Schedule of debts Continuity Schedule of Debenture Debt n mi ■ 1 (1) (d) Schedule of guarantee and indemnity agreements NIL report d II MI 1 (1) (e) Schedule of employee remuneration and expenses a mi mi 1 (1) (f) Schedule of suppliers of goods and services a mi mi 1 (3) Statements prepared on a consolidated basis or for each fund, as appropriate Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Consolidated Statement of Operations Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow CnntnliclatPd Stmt of Chn in NPt Financial AS'Pt'O X 11 11 1 (4) 1 (5) Notes to the financial statements for the statements and schedules listed above b ■ ■ 1 FIR Schedule 1 Section Item Yes No N/A Comments Statement of Assets & Liabilities 2 • A balance sheet prepared in accordance with GAAP or stated accounting principles / policies, and • Show changes in equity and surplus or deficit due to operations Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Consolidated Statement of Operations n ■ mi Operational Statement 3 (1) Prepared in accordance with GAAP or stated accounting principles / policies and consists of: • a Statement of Income or Statement of Revenue and Expenditures, and • a Statement of Changes in Financial Position Consolidated Statement of Operations Consolidated Statement of Change in Net Financial Assets 3 (2) 3 (3) • The Statement of Changes in Financial Position may be omitted if it provides no additional information • The omission must be explained in the notes 11 A fl 3 (4) Community colleges, school districts, and municipalities must prepare a Statement of Changes in Financial Position for the Capital Fund Statement of Change in Equity in Capital Assets El ■ ■ Schedule of Debts 4 (1) (a) 4 (2) List each long-term debt (secured by debentures, mortgages, bonds, etc.), stating the amount outstanding, the interest rate, and the maturity date Continuity Schedule of Debenture Debt a ■ ■ 4 (1) (b) Identify debts covered by sinking funds or reserves and amounts in these accounts Continuity Schedule of Debenture Debt b A . 4 (3) 4 (4) • The schedule may be omitted if addressed under section 2 or 5 and it provides no additional information • The omission must be explained in a note to the schedule • • b 2 FIR Schedule 1 Section Item Yes No N/A Comments Schedule of Guarantee and Indemnity Agreements 5 (1) List financial agreements that required government approval prior to being given (see Guarantees and Indemnities Regulation in FIA Guidance Package) II II 1l 5 (2) State the entities involved, and the specific amount involved if known A II Di 5 (3) 5 (4) • The schedule may be omitted if addressed under section 2 or 4 and it provides no additional information • The omission must be explained in a note to the schedule 11 11 El Schedule of Remuneration and Expenses (See Guidance Package for suggested format) 6 (2) (a) List separately, by name and position, the total remuneration and the total expenses for each elected official, member of the board of directors, and employee appointed by Cabinet Information provided in Schedule 1 (1) (e) El A II 6 (2) (b) List alphabetically each employee whose total remuneration exceeds $75,000 and the total expenses for each [excluding the persons listed under 6 (2) (a)] Information provided in Schedule 1 (1) (e) El ■ 1 6 (2) (c) Include a consolidated total for employees whose remuneration is $75,000 or less [excluding the persons listed under 6 (2) (a)] Information provided in Schedule 1 (1) (e) x 11 II 6 (2) (d) Reconcile or explain any difference between total remuneration in this schedule and related information in the operational statement Information provided in Schedule 1 (1) (e) fl 11 II 6 (3) Exclude personal information other than name, position, function or remuneration and expenses of employees Information provided in Payroll Schedule n ■ • 3 FIR Schedule 1 Section Item Yes No N/A Comments Schedule of Remuneration and Expenses (See Guidance Package for suggested format) 6 (6) Report the employer portion of El and CPP as a supplier payment to the Receiver General for Canada rather than as employee remuneration Information provided in Schedule 1 (1) (e) a a a 6 (7) (a) 6 (7) (b) Include a statement of severance agreements providing: • the number of severance agreements under which payment commenced in the fiscal year being reported on for non-union employees, and • the range of equivalent months' compensation for them (see Guidance Package for suggested format) x 11 II 6 (8) Provide the reason for omitting a statement of severance agreements in a note to the schedule of remuneration and expenses 1I 111 a Schedule of Suppliers of Goods or Services (See Guidance Package for suggested format) 7 (1) (a) List in alphabetical order all suppliers of goods and services who received aggregate payments exceeding $25,000 Information provided in Schedule 1 (1) (f) fl • • 7 (1) (b) Include a consolidated total of all payments to suppliers who received $25,000 or less Information provided in Schedule 1 (1) (f) n MI 11 7 (1) (c) Reconcile or explain any difference between the consolidated total and related figures in the operational statement Information provided in Schedule 1 (1) (fl M • 1 7 (2) (b) Include a statement of payments for the purposes of grants or contributions Information provided in Schedule 1 (1) (f) a . 11 4 FIR Schedule 1 Section Item Yes No N/A Comments Inactive Corporations 8 (1) The ministry reports for the corporation if the corporation is not operating to the extent required to produce a SOFT 11 El 8 (2) (a) The ministry's report contains the statements and schedules required under section 1 (1), to the extent possible • II b 8 (2) (b) The ministry's report contains a statement of the operational status of the corporation (see Guidance Package regarding what to include) II II b Approval of Financial Information 9 (1) Corporations other than municipalities — the SOFT is signed as approved by the board of directors or the governing body (see Guidance Package for example) • II n 9 (2) Municipalities — the SOFI is approved by its council and by the officer assigned responsibility for financial administration (see Guidance Package for example) DI 11 II 9 (3) A management report is included, signed by the head and chief financial officer, or by the municipal officer assigned responsibility for financial administration (see examples in annual report at http://www.gov.bc.ca/cas/popt/) El 11 II 9 (4) The management report explains the roles and responsibilities of the board of directors or governing body, audit committee, management, and the auditors EI II II 9 (5) Signature approvals required in section 9 are for each of the statements and schedules of financial information, not just the financial statements b • • 5 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at December 31, 2012 Restated 2012 2011 (Note 12) Financial Assets Cash and temporary investments (Note 1) $ 103,940,358 $ 26,998,661 Portfolio investments (Note 1) 33,315,006 90,812,593 Accounts receivable (Note 2) 19,464,140 17,547,470 Recoverable local improvements (Note 3) 1,853,310 1,637,104 Other assets (Note 7) 684,971 610,856 Inventory available for resale 187 187 159,257,972 137, 606,871 Liabilities Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 5) 12,934,269 13,142,472 Deferred revenue 9,236,244 8,928,225 Restricted revenue (Note 11) 45,357,203 41,042,622 Refundable performance deposits and other 12,176,806 8,964,044 Employee future benefits (Note 8) 4,745,500 4,684,900 Long-term debt (Note 6, Schedule 4) 42,086,722 38,505,484 126,536,744 115,267, 747 Net Financial Assets 32.721.228 22,339,124 Non Financial Assets Tangible capital assets (Note 13, Schedule 5) 814,115,960 801,626,175 Undeveloped land bank properties (Note 17) 14,448,184 14,832,041 Supplies inventory 303,347 400,606 Prepaid expenses 629.721 447,067 829,497,212 817,305,889 Accumulated Surplus (Note 15) $ 862.218.440 $ 839,645,013 Paul Gill, CGA Ernie Daykin General Manager, Corporate & Financial Services Mayor, District of Maple Ridge a). The notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement b). Contingencies, Commitments and Unrecognized Liabilities (Note 10) c). Pension Plan (Note 4) Consolidated Statement of Operations For the year ended December 31, 2012 Revenue (Segment Report, Note 18) Taxes for municipal purposes (Note 9) User fees and other revenue Senior government transfers Development revenue Interest and investment income Investment Income Interest Income Less: Deferred amount Interest and investment income Gaming revenues Refinancing and other gains Gain (loss) on disposal of tangible capital asset Contributed tangible capital assets (Note 13) Expenses (Segment Report, Note 18) Protective services Transportation services Recreation and cultural Water utility Sewer utility General government Planning, public health and other Annual Surplus Accumulated Surplus - beginning of year Accumulated Surplus - end of year (Note 15) 3,204,700 825,549 (544,221) Actual 2012 $ 64,939,423 34,698,238 4,421,302 5,626,781 3,486,028 819,341 (1,530,761) 16.709.523 129,169,875 30,619,435 16,781,930 19,529,726 13,138,936 9,279,252 13,307,270 3.939.899 106,596,448 22.573.427 Budget 2012 (Note 14) $ 65,038,017 35,086,269 13,997,301 26,725,747 1,753,000 500,000 12,250,000 155,350,334 32,344,677 17,287,026 21,635,975 16,281,644 10,059,710 15,584,156 4,321,633 117,514,821 37,835,513 Restated Actual 2011 (Note 12) $ 61,065,872 32,936,021 12,817,578 3,920,831 3,473,800 756,427 102,031 (632,238) 19,875,197 134,315,519 28,793,697 16,032,874 19,729,780 10,581,132 8,787,219 12,816,529 3,665,417 100,406,648 33,908,871 839.645.013 839,645,013 805,736,142 $ 862.218.440 $ 877,480,526 $ 839,645,013 a). The notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement b). Contingencies, Commitments and Unrecognized Liabilities (Note 10) c). Pension Plan (Note 4) Continuity Schedule of Debenture Debt For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 Date of Issue/Maturity Bylaw/MFA Function/Purpose Schedule 4 Interest Rate Long Term Debts Apr 2005/2027 6246/93 Recreation/Downtown Civic Properties Apr 2005/2027 6246/93 General Government/Downtown Office Complex Dec 2006/2027 6246/99 General Government/Downtown Office Complex Oct 2012/2017 6562/08 General Government/River Road Drainage Oct 2012/2027 6560/08 Protective Services/Animal Shelter Oct 2012/2037 6559/08 Public Health/Cemetery Expansion Oct 2012/2037 6679/09 Public Health/Cemetery Expansion Subtotal LESS: Sinking Funds Dec 2006/2027 6246/99 General Government/Downtown Office Complex Subtotal Net Amount 5.7 % 5.7 % 5.0 % 2.1 % 2.9 % 2.9 % 2.9 % 5.0 % Dec 31, 2011 New Debt Issued Principal/ Sinking Fund 2012 Interest Paid/ Balance During the year Sinking Fund Earnings Balance Earned Outstanding Payments Outstanding For The Year 22,125,645 - 1,113,050 - 21,012,595 1,203,035 3,068,294 - 154,344 - 2,913,950 166,823 16,300,000 - - - 16,300,000 813,370 2,675,000 - - 2,675,000 62,338 625,000 - - 625,000 15,897 1,520,000 - - 1,520,000 38,573 700,000 - - 700,000 9,150 41,493,939 5,520,000 1,267,394 - 45,746,545 2,309,186 2,988,455 - 547,383 123,985 3,659,823 123,985 2,988,455 - 547,383 123,985 3,659,823 123,985 $ 38,505,484 $ 5,520,000 $ 1,814,777 $ 123,985 $ 42,086,722 $ 2,185,201 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule of Guarantee and Indemnity Agreements for 2012 "This organization has no guarantees or indemnities under the Guarantees and Indemnities Regulation." Prepared pursuant to the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (d) The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing the Remuneration and Expenses Paid to or on Behalf of Each Employee for 2012 1 Elected officials Name Position Remuneration Benefits Expenses Ashlie, Cheryl Bell, Corisa Daykin, Ernest Dueck, Judy Hogarth, Al Masse, Robert Morden, Michael Totals Other Employees (excluding those listed 2 in Part 1 above) Councillor Councillor Mayor Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor $ 42,762.26 $ 42,762.41 $ 99,435.96 $ 42,691.28 $ 42,762.41 $ 42,904.37 $ 42,837.59 1,742.88 1,742.88 1,906.56 1,598.88 1,598.88 1,598.88 1,598.88 $4,645.80 $6,681.38 $6,838.41 $1,019.91 $4,558.52 $2,548.99 $2,730.10 356,156.28 11,787.84 29,023.11 Name Position Remuneration Expenses Acharya, Rasika Armour, Douglas M. Armstrong, Fred Balatti, Christa Barrett, Kevin G. Baski, Sebastian Bastaja, John Bayley, Christopher C. Benson, Laura Bevilacqua, Jim Bitcon, Stan Blakeway, Alexander Blue, Sandra Boag, David Bonifazi, Marco Bruce, Robert Burrell, Lorne Butler, Mary Carmichael, Russ Carter, Christine Charlebois, Jim Christensen, Robert Clelland, James Collard, Shaun Cooke, David Cote-Rolvink, Stephen J. Cotroneo, Tony Cotter, Steve Crabtree, Christina L. Cramb, Donald B. Daunais, Don Planner II Firefighter, Acting Lieutenant Manager Corporate Communications Recreation Manager, Health & Wellness Firefighter Firefighter Director of Corporate Support Fire Captain Manager of Sustainability & Corp Planning Fire Captain Foreman II - Sewerworks Foreman III - Waterworks Manager Strategic Economic Initiatives Director, Parks & Facilities Firefighter Firefighter Trades Foreman Firefighter Director of Engineering Operations Director of Planning Manager of Community Planning Fire Captain Firefighter Firefighter GIS Coordinator Manager of Inspection Services Recreation Mgr, Youth & Neighborhood Sery Firefighter Director of Information Technology Senior Recreation Mgr, Pitt Meadows Area Electrical Inspector $87,500.84 $1,276.27 $110,077.44 $322.00 $113,550.39 $129.88 $104,021.41 $60.00 $95,498.26 $90.00 $89,626.82 $0.00 $137,282.94 $1,013.44 $112,966.28 $0.00 $107,525.81 $1,536.54 $122,502.57 $250.00 $76,757.04 $474.15 $75,430.01 $152.63 $107,425.82 $10,165.16 $138,637.81 $1,192.35 $78,103.95 $0.00 $87,331.69 $690.95 $101,717.71 $0.00 $81,647.72 $0.00 $142,742.08 $1,269.56 $138,095.33 $2,696.61 $75,614.54 $152.62 $112,335.45 $20.00 $77,505.01 $690.95 $83,275.72 $690.95 $96,300.73 $126.90 $119,498.37 $2,869.63 $96,680.62 $93.76 $96,817.31 $0.00 $115,941.81 $576.03 $123,302.37 $2,434.25 $75,397.70 $0.00 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (e) and Section 6 (2) (a -d), (3) (b) and Section (6) The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing the Remuneration and Expenses Paid to or on Behalf of Each Employee for 2012 Davis, Craig Firefighter $109,134.14 $0.00 Davis, Jeff Firefighter $97,241.87 $0.00 Denton, Darrell E. Business Retention & Expansion Officer $76,470.86 $2,366.23 Dickson, Janet Senior Analyst Programmer $81,015.93 $1,314.56 Dingwall, William J. Manager of Utility Engineering $123,639.11 $4,307.48 Dorrell, Robert Tradesperson - Foreman $79,858.09 $0.00 Eng, Michael Traffic & Transportation Technologist $81,554.50 $919.59 Ettinger, Glenn Firefighter $103,439.21 $690.95 Exner, Howard Fire Assistant Chief, Training & Operations $134,365.33 $2,025.49 Franklin, Steven Fire Captain $109,228.62 $0.00 Gaudette, Christopher Firefighter $95,276.70 $0.00 Gill, Paul GM, Corporate & Financial Services $193,108.47 $6,511.69 Gjaltema, Michael Tradesperson II, Electrician $78,925.99 $581.00 Glasgow, Ian Firefighter $94,743.17 $24.22 Goddard, Charles Manager of Dev & Environmental Services $127,797.80 $5,675.90 Gordon, Thomas Engineering Technologist I $80,015.21 $303.22 Gormley, Kathleen Manager of Business Systems $105,383.83 $361.45 Grootendorst, Peter Fire Chief, Director Fire Oper. & Staff Dev $151,717.81 $9,050.87 Guerra, Maria Senior Project Engineer $102,153.41 $1,176.55 Guy, Ronald Engineering Works Inspector $77,821.05 $483.31 Hall, Diana Planner 11 $87,500.82 $479.80 Hampton, Warren Firefighter $87,742.36 $35.00 Hansen, Damon Firefighter $89,134.83 $28.00 Harcus, David Fire Captain $101,281.55 $24.22 Hardy, Wayne Superintendent Roads & Equipment $121,882.64 $300.16 Harwood, Kevin Fire Captain $109,282.03 $20.00 Holitzki, Elizabeth Director Licences, Permits & Bylaws $150,278.15 $4,252.68 Hopper, Clinton Firefighter $87,121.51 $0.00 Jonat, Cameron Firefighter $97,589.39 $19.25 Jones, Maureen Senior Mgr of Police Services, Fin & Admin $102,816.22 $28.83 Jorde, Shelley Recreation Mgr Community Connections $110,992.42 $135.71 Judd, Stephen Manager of Infrastructure Development $105,367.41 $649.34 Juoksu, Paul Building Inspector I $78,223.60 $837.07 Juurakko, Timo Fire Asst Chief, Comm & Support Services $132,539.09 $2,271.75 Kopystynski, Adrian Planner 11 $75,882.60 $85.00 Lamont, Kathy I. Personnel Officer $93,846.81 $12.03 Leeburn, John Executive Director to CAO $131,852.08 $535.51 Liu, Wilson Geomatics Supervisor $80,439.23 $384.62 Macdonald, Robert Firefighter $91,748.12 $3,451.50 Mah, Edwin Building Inspector I $75,365.39 $763.12 Mallory, Geoffrey Manager Parks and Open Space $101,277.08 $470.20 Marto, Ceri Mgr of Legislative Services & Emerg. Program $128,006.54 $2,817.47 McCormick, Wendy Director of Recreation $134,524.27 $3,303.34 McCurry, Aaron Foreman II - Waterworks $76,050.08 $82.30 McKee, Christopher J. Firefighter, Acting Lieutenant $97,924.62 $33.86 McLeod, Bruce Manager, Parks Planning & Development $109,030.01 $4,123.80 Merenick, Diane Bylaw Services Supervisor $87,910.82 $1,311.98 Mikes, Daniela Manager of Procurement $98,446.29 $4,331.11 Millward, Michael Facilities Operations Manager $107,254.09 $1,251.49 Mitchell, Ed Superintendent Waterworks $114,525.66 $4,535.69 Narayan, Sureshwar Senior Analyst Programmer $91,782.55 $2,308.12 Negoita, Victor Electro/Mechanical Manager $109,349.15 $3,936.64 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (e) and Section 6 (2) (a -d), (3) (b) and Section (6) The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing the Remuneration and Expenses Paid to or on Behalf of Each Employee for 2012 Newbery, Jerry Building Services Supervisor $85,161.53 $19.05 Nolan, Catherine Manager of Accounting $113,139.82 $2,769.55 Oleschak, Walter Superintendent of Roads and Fleet $100,678.82 $2,991.44 Perkin, Kevin G. Fire Lieutenant $97,911.42 $0.00 Pollock, David Municipal Engineer $139,317.52 $1,060.43 Pope, Danielle Manager of Business Operations $88,648.47 $838.34 Porter, Gary K. Fire Lieutenant $105,258.26 $0.00 Quinn, Frank GM, Public Works & Development Services $204,131.83 $4,102.59 Ramsay, Robert Fire Training Officer $111,421.99 $1,149.01 Riach, Ron Property & Risk Manager $103,390.45 $184.31 Richmond, Calvin Foreman 111 $83,512.49 $475.99 Rule, James Chief Administrative Officer $246,561.81 $10,490.69 Rutledge, Silvia Manager of Revenue & Collections $109,661.22 $1,662.21 Schurer, Oliver Business Systems Analyst $86,093.03 $559.63 Serediuk, Sean Network Support Specialist $95,398.45 $627.14 Serne, Bernie Superintendent Sewer works $105,717.01 $2,121.56 Seward, Adam R. Firefighter, Acting Lieutenant $98,364.14 $143.79 Sinclair, James G. Fire Captain $90,033.54 $4,576.50 Smitton, Mark Fire Asst Chief, Fire Prev & Communications $121,764.27 $3,274.35 Snow, Roy C. Firefighter, Acting Lieutenant $98,934.42 $239.42 Spence, Dane Fire Chief, Director Comm Fire Safety Services $152,232.21 $5,500.82 Stewart, Michael Fire Captain $113,371.29 $28.00 Stott, Rodney C. Environmental Planner $87,500.81 $153.52 Stripp, Mitchell Electronics Technician $80,633.18 $3,480.31 Swift, Kelly GM, Community Dev, Parks & Recreation $170,446.68 $2,036.76 Teboekhorst, Dennis Fire Lieutenant $117,012.01 $0.00 Thompson, Trevor Manager of Financial Planning $107,225.81 $5,631.41 Todd, Thomas Foreman 111 - Sewerworks $90,513.77 $805.88 Traviss, Stephen Senior Human Resources Officer $107,970.39 $6,609.58 Vandenbor, Paul J. Engineering Works Inspector $77,821.01 $0.00 Van Dop, Michael J. Firefighter, Acting Asst Fire Chief, Plan&Prev. $99,391.50 $1,526.25 Van Tunen, Randolph Foreman III - Parks $75,582.22 $0.00 Varcoe, Thomas Foreman 11 - Electro/Mechanical $79,925.26 $0.00 Vinje, Brock Firefighter $87,870.67 $9.64 Wetherill, Michelle Manager, Payroll & Employee Relations $110,127.98 $1,147.63 Wheeler, Susan Director of Community Services $121,838.48 $2,130.52 Wilson, Davin Engineering Technologist! $83,056.07 $3,289.02 Wilson, Samuel Water System Operator $76,923.05 $171.23 Wing, Graham Firefighter $86,093.17 $1,554.25 Wong, Richard Manager of Design & Projects $90,609.70 $754.38 Zosiak, Lisa A. Planner II $87,670.91 $1,986.87 Subtotal $12,939,886.72 $181,688.80 Consolidated Total of Employees with remuneration less than $75,000 Total All Employees 18,499,051.56 100,378.03 31,438,938.28 282,066.83 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (e) and Section 6 (2) (a -d), (3) (b) and Section (6) 3 Reconciliation Total remuneration Elected Officials Other Employees Subtotal Other reconciling Items Employer portion of: The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing the Remuneration and Expenses Paid to or on Behalf of Each Employee for 2012 CPP El Accruals WCB Pension Other employer costs (Medical, Dental, etc.) Wages & Salaries per Consolidated Financial Statements, Annual Report, Page 67 356,156.28 31,438,938.28 31,795,094.56 986,897.96 475,577.32 678.00 287,145.28 2,544,592.00 1,392,987.51 37,482,972.63 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (e) and Section 6 (2) (a -d), (3) (b) and Section (6) The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing Payments Made for the Provision of Goods or Services for 2012 1 Alphabetical list of suppliers who received aggregate payments exceeding $25,000 Supplier Name Aggregate amount paid to supplier 0681186 BC Ltd. $49,373.70 0891551 BC Ltd. $40,484.00 0724674 BC Ltd. $50,000.00 0775983 BC Ltd. $53,479.55 0946235 BC Ltd. $41,419.82 A & A Testing Ltd. $136,880.58 A & G Supply Ltd. $63,754.52 A 0 K Tree Service Ltd. $29,400.84 A T & H Industries Inc $191,370.94 Ablesun Plastics Ltd. $38,933.32 Accent Glass & Locksmith $75,547.22 Adopt A Block Society $25,000.00 AECOM Canada Ltd. $44,640.76 Alliance Painting & Decorating $33,768.00 Alouette River Management Soc $25,880.00 AMEC Earth & Environmental Ltd. $53,443.12 Quinnell, James Arthur & Laura Michelle $779,797.59 Andrew Sheret Ltd. $37,848.88 Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd. $147,275.53 Armtec Limited Partnership $41,146.06 Art.Site $46,607.33 Avenue Machinery Corp $112,459.77 AW Fire Guard & Supplies Ltd. $37,488.30 Bartle & Gibson Co. Ltd. $47,387.59 BC Hydro $1,306,741.76 BC SPCA $335,404.60 BCRS Road Safe Inc. $79,193.72 BDO Canada LLP $51,464.46 BFI Canada Vancouver $110,251.41 Billesberger, Valerie $89,001.92 Black Press Group Ltd. $52,929.92 Bob's A -Z Rentals Ltd. $35,614.84 Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd. $318,318.75 Brook Pooni Associates Inc. $29,336.72 Canada Pipe Company Ltd. $146,907.70 Canadian Pacific Railway $47,772.03 Cense! Survey Equipment Inc. $49,543.33 Canstar Restorations $30,883.45 Capilano Highway Services $207,805.15 Carter Pontiac Buick Ltd. $114,750.72 Centimark Corporation $32,760.45 Chairlines $28,300.16 Chase Office Interiors $31,581.74 Chevron Canada Ltd. $976,719.41 City Of Pitt Meadows $664,443.69 Columbia Bitulithic Ltd. $325,411.53 Commercial Aquatic Supplies $48,401.39 Commercial Solutions Inc. $80,983.81 Con -West Contracting Ltd. $27,664.00 Co -Pilot Industries Ltd. $132,580.16 Coquitlam Ridge Constructors $221,331.71 Corix Water Products $67,955.91 Creative Transportation $39,438.56 Cross, Connie $50,422.74 Crown Contracting Limited $203,729.34 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (f) and Section 7 (1) (a -c) and (2) (b) The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing Payments Made for the Provision of Goods or Services for 2012 CSDC Systems Inc. Dams Ford Lincoln Sales Ltd. Delcan Corporation Diamond Land Consultants Inc. Dixon Networks Corporation Double M Excavating Ltd. Douglas Lake Equipment Downtown Maple Ridge Business DSD Document Systems Direct Ltd. Eagle West Truck & Crane Inc. Econolite Canada Inc. EMCO Corporation Emergency Communications for Southwest BC Empire Signworks Inc. Equity Valuation & Consulting ESRI Canada Limited Exp Services Inc. Falcon Centre Joint Venture Family Education & Support Ctr First Truck Centre Vancouver Inc. Fitness Edge Fleet Services Installation Flynn Canada Ltd. Fort Fabrication & Welding Ltd. FortisBC - Natural Gas Fraser Valley Fire Protection Fraser Valley Regional Library Frazer Excavation Ltd. Fred Surridge Ltd. Fuseforward International Inc. G P Rollo & Associates Ltd. Gibson Waterworks Supply Inc. Golden Ears Ortho & Sports Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage Greater Vancouver Water District Green Landscape Experts Ltd. Greengym Outdoor Fitness Equipment Guest Excavating Company Ltd. Guillevin International Inc. Habitat Systems Inc. Hanks Trucking And Bulldozing Hapa Collaborative Heenan Blaikie LLP High Profile Roof Care Inc. Homewood Human Solutions Canada Houle Electric Ltd. ICBC - Fleet Insurance ICOM Canada IDR Services Ltd. Imperial Paving Inprotect Systems Inc. Interprovincial Traffic Services ISL Engineering & Land Services Jack 4 Trade Jacks Automotive & Welding Justice Institute of BC Kerr Wood Leidal Associates Keywest Asphalt Ltd. $53,448.64 $42,176.97 $185,899.37 $71,081.64 $28,812.00 $1,176,320.04 $32,263.25 $268,404.38 $65,090.57 $39,891.04 $34,872.57 $54,118.32 $971,209.00 $50,812.17 $62,412.00 $88,761.23 $52,459.26 $50,000.00 $29,000.00 $246,529.89 $194,491.38 $28,917.45 $162,726.89 $86,125.31 $214,755.49 $29,740.14 $2,486,131.00 $166,129.26 $142,129.70 $35,840.00 $67,638.72 $60,589.14 $91,083.96 $51,876.80 $8,842,705.75 $58,956.81 $26,045.60 $31,102.40 $221,897.64 $105,754.31 $57,737.12 $44,011.58 $47,500.34 $32,284.00 $38,492.97 $39,405.36 $154,734.00 $53,939.90 $32,038.10 $2,243,775.81 $81,966.19 $181,944.00 $50,014.12 $58,665.15 $157,934.00 $34,480.58 $30,865.19 $729,854.26 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (f) and Section 7 (1) (a -c) and (2) (b) The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing Payments Made for the Provision of Goods or Services for 2012 Lafarge Canada Inc. $32,802.25 LCP Signal Management Inc. $46,351.20 Letts Environmental Consultant $57,455.49 Lordco Parts Ltd. $91,409.68 Lups Contractors Ltd. $31,095.40 MacLean Homes $47,076.00 Manulife Financial $994,390.86 Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council $761,456.03 Maple Ridge Historical Society $134,328.00 Mar -Tech Underground Services $132,071.27 Marten Timmer Excavating Ltd. $312,207.85 Matcon Civil Constructors Inc. $125,754.16 McRae's Septic Tank Service $68,883.79 McTar Petroleum Ltd. $99,573.74 Medical Services Plan $277,776.90 Medisys Health Group Inc. $44,225.55 Metro Motors Ltd. $110,983.04 Microserve $570,640.25 Microsoft Licensing $103,146.05 Mierau $111,618.24 Mills Printing & Stationery $72,429.23 Minister of Finance - Dept.of Transportation $28,479.01 MMM Group Limited $50,330.21 Mobilecom Radio Company $25,273.56 Municipal Insurance Assoc. $450,209.50 Municipal Pension Plan $2,545,269.77 Newlands Lawn & Garden Maintenance $132,568.80 North of 49 Enterprises Ltd. $108,220.84 Nova Pole International Inc. $26,120.08 Now Solutions $53,844.00 Ocean Pipe T6045 $35,209.94 OK Tire $29,721.36 Open Storage Solutions $184,999.80 Oracle Corporation Canada Inc. $48,390.18 Pacific Ace Sports Surfaces $100,177.28 Pacific Flow Control Ltd. $49,051.52 Panorama LMS 4011 $119,703.02 Pattison Sign Group $25,314.24 Paul Bunyan Tree Services $143,446.80 Peter Dorozan Cable Communications $28,161.28 Pitney Works $45,416.90 Pitt Meadows Heritage & Museum $76,416.00 Pitt River Quarries $64,559.94 Plan Group Inc. $65,688.60 PW Trenchless Construction Inc. $226,302.36 Quantum Murray LP $31,920.48 Rainbow Paving Ltd. $29,030.40 Raincity Janitorial Services Ltd. $383,024.89 Raybern Erectors Ltd. $53,769.54 RCMP - Receiver General $13,107,665.75 Receiver General -Payroll Deductions $1,443,914.71 Reliable Flagging Services Ltd. $55,477.15 Remdal Painting & Restoration $141,616.91 RF Binnie & Associates Ltd. $130,538.70 RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd. $745,589.58 RGH Pacific Emergency Services $53,676.00 RHE Communications Inc. $25,364.61 Ridge Meadows Seniors Society $195,622.00 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (f) and Section 7 (1) (a -c) and (2) (b) The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing Payments Made for the Provision of Goods or Services for 2012 Ridge Meadows Recycling Society $1,299,026.70 RJ Construction $87,870.64 Robert Glenn Nat Plant Nursery $40,043.64 Rogers $131,104.04 Ross Systems Inc. $91,994.13 Scottish Line Painting Ltd. $106,719.27 Seal Tec Industries Ltd. $75,334.64 Shades Of Green Landscaping $30,217.60 Shi Canada ULC $30,432.72 Smart -Tek Communications Inc. $47,803.41 Smithrite Portable Services $29,166.14 Spartan Controls Ltd. $56,402.18 Springford, Nicola $53,243.34 Stak Fitness $78,912.96 Star Five Classic Country $43,012.18 Strohmaier's Excavating Ltd. $337,500.43 Summit Valve & Controls Inc. $25,592.72 Surrey Fire Service $86,155.00 Suttle Recreation Inc. $86,371.24 T & T Demolition Ltd. $59,646.16 Tag Construction Ltd. $1,236,180.66 Targa Contracting Ltd. $434,927.39 Telus $105,983.50 Telus Services Inc. $38,332.19 Terra Link Horticulture Inc. $28,235.87 The Birks Company $45,968.09 Thunderbird Plastics Ltd. $31,640.00 Total Energy Systems Ltd. $290,193.94 Total Power Inc. $51,956.51 Touchstone Marble & Tile Ltd. $46,959.36 Tourism Maple Ridge & Pitt Meadows $43,200.00 Tundra Plumbing Ltd. $42,959.81 Tybo Contracting Ltd. $330,180.06 Union of BC Municipalities $30,431.49 Universal Contracting Ltd. $143,227.98 Urban Systems $83,077.45 Valley Landscaping Ltd. $34,934.14 Valley Traffic Systems Inc. $98,415.91 Van Houtte Coffee Services Inc. $40,150.51 Vanderwal Equipment Ltd. $25,555.77 Warrington PCI Management $822,899.72 Wedler Engineering $63,270.24 Wesco Distribution Inc. $35,230.69 West Coast Elevator Services $40,556.20 Westcoast Fitness Fixations Inc. $36,473.92 Westridge Security Ltd. $87,095.40 Westview Sales Ltd. $69,662.32 Whonnock Roofing Ltd. $37,083.20 Wilco Civil Inc. $607,831.83 Willis Canada Inc. $426,348.00 Winvan Paving Ltd. $71,323.27 Workers Compensation Board $363,338.28 Xylem Canada Company $40,007.68 Young, Anderson - Barristers $329,559.65 Zone West Enterprises Ltd. $31,826.96 63,246,203 Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (f) and Section 7 (1) (a -c) and (2) (b) The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Schedule Showing Payments Made for the Provision of Goods or Services for 2012 2 Consolidated total paid to suppliers who received aggregate payments of $25,000 or less 3 Total of payments to suppliers for grants and contributions exceeding $25,000 Consolidated total of grants exceeding $25,000 Consolidated total of contributions exceeding $25,000 Consolidated total of all grants and contributions exceeding $25,000 4,488,876 30,000 30,000 4 Reconciliation Total of aggregate payments exceeding $25,000 paid to suppliers $ 63,246,203 Consolidated total of payments of $25,000 or less paid to suppliers $ 4,488,876 Consolidated total of all grants and contributions exceeding $25,000 $ 30,000 Reconciling items Explanation below Total per Financial Statements, Expenditures & Expenses, Goods & Services including Capital $ 64,125,897 Variance $ (3,639,182) Expenditures in the statements are on an accrual basis, whereas amounts paid are on a cash basis. It is important to note that not all payments are expenditures and that not all expenditures are payments. It is not practical to reconcile to those sets of data. Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 1 (1) (f) and Section 7 (1) (a -c) and (2) (b) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow For the year ended December 31, 2012 Restated Actual Actual 2012 2011 (Note 12) Operating transactions Annual surplus $22,573,427 $33,908,871 Items not utilizing cash Amortization 17,620,754 17,135,746 Loss on disposal of tangible capital assets 1,530,761 632,238 Contributed tangible capital assets (16,709,523) (19,875,197) Restricted revenues drawn in (4.777.088) (3,615,693) (2,335,096) (5,722,906) Change in non-cash operating items Increase in prepaid expenses (182,654) (43,647) Decrease (increase) in supplies inventory 97,260 (6,391) Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable (1,916,670) (1,145,435) Decrease (increase) in recoverable local improvements (216,206) 703,568 Decrease (increase) in other assets (74,116) (20,136) Decrease (increase) in inventory available for resale 471,471 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities (208,203) 920,698 Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue 308,019 (3,289,003) Increase (decrease) in refundable performance deposits 3,212,763 3,151,452 Increase (decrease) in employee future benefits 60,600 273,400 1,080,793 1,015,977 Cash provided by operating transactions 21,319,124 29,201,942 Capital transactions Proceeds on disposal of tangible capital assets 74,097 820,825 Cash used to acquire tangible capital assets (15,005,876) (26,736,384) Reclassificaton of land bank properties 383,857 - Cash applied to capital transactions (14,547,922) (25,915,559) Investing transactions Decrease (increase) in portfolio investments 57,497,587 (11,954,127) 57,497,587 (11,954,127) Financing transactions Proceeds from debt issues 5,520,000 Debt repayment (1,938,761) (1,878,010) Collection of restricted revenues 9,091,669 7,481,816 Cash applied to financing transactions 12,672,908 5,603,806 Increase in cash and temporary investments Cash and temporary investments - beginning of year 76,941,697 (3,063,938) 26,998,661 30,062,599 Cash and temporary investments - end of year $103.940.358 $26,998,661 Supplementary information: Non-cash transactions: Transfer from undeveloped landbank properties to tangible capital assets 383,857 - Transfer from inventory available for resale to tangible capital assets 471,471 a). The notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement b). Contingencies, Commitments and Unrecognized Liabilities (Note 10) c). Pension Plan (Note 4) Consolidated Statement of Change in Net Financial Assets For the year ended December 31, 2012 Annual Surplus Add (Less): Change in Tangible Capital Assets Acquisition of tangible capital assets Amortization Proceeds from disposal of tangible capital assets Loss(gain) on disposal of tangible capital assets Change in Other Non Financial Assets Decrease (increase) in supplies inventory Reclassification of undeveloped land bank Acquisition of land bank properties Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses Increase (decrease) in Net Financial Assets Net Financial Assets beginning of the year Net Financial Assets end of the year Actual 2012 $ 22,573,427 (31,715,399) 17,620,754 74,100 1.530.761 (12,489,784) 97,258 383,857 (182.654) 298,461 10,382,104 22.339.124 Budget 2012 (Note 14) $ 37,835,513 (97,311,137) 18,015,247 (79,295,890) $ (41,460,377) 22,339,124 $ 32,721,228 $ Restated Actual 2011 (Note 12) $ 33,908,871 (46,295,458) 17,135,746 820,825 632,238 (27,706,649) (6,389) (316,123) (43,647) (366,159) 5,836,063 16,503,061 (19,121,253) $ 22,339,124 a). The notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement b). Contingencies, Commitments and Unrecognized Liabilities (Note 10) c). Pension Plan (Note 4) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements For the year ended December 31, 2012 1. Cash and Investments Cash and Temporary Investments: Cash and temporary investments as at December 31, 2012 were comprised as follows: Dec 31. 2012 Dec 31, 2011 Cash $ 15,782,589 Temporary Investments 88,157,769 $ 4,929,549 22,069,112 $ 103,940.358 $ 26,998,661 Temporary investments are comprised of BC Credit Union term deposits and Canadian bank notes with effective interest rates of 1.8% - 2.45%. Additionally, the District holds temporary investments of $1,819,883 ($1,652,394 for 2011) and agreements receivable of $449,909 ($258,450 for 2011) for trusts which are not reported elsewhere in the financial statements. They are held for the following trusts: Latecomer Fees Cemetery Perpetual Care Greater Vancouver Sewer & Drainage District Albion Dyking District Balance Dec 31, 2011 Interest Earned Receipts Disbursements $ 65,223 $ 825,040 469,095 $ 70,854 $ 16,540 44,805 873,733 551,486 342 184,215 72,824 $ 16,540 478,798 Balance Dec 31, 2012 63,253 869,845 864,030 263,379 472,664 $ 1,910,844 $ 16,882 $1,173,607 $ 831,541 $ 2,269,792 Portfolio Investments Portfolio investments include Canadian bank notes and BC Credit Union term deposits with effective interest rates of 2.25-2.63%. A portion of the bank notes held have interest payments linked to the performance of a set of equities or a financial index without stated or certain interest rates. For these investments, income is recognized as it is received; in 2012 returns were positive and ranged to 6.74%. Included in interest earnings are gains on the sale of investments before maturity. In 2012 gains totalled $936,534 ($1,148,044 for 2011). The District does not hold any asset backed commercial paper or hedge funds. The carrying value of securities is based on the cost method whereby the cost of the security is adjusted to reflect investment income that is accruing and any permanent decline in market value. During the term of individual investments there will be fluctuations in market values. Such fluctuations are considered normal, and if held to maturity, market value will be equal to face value. The carrying value of Portfolio Investments at December 31, 2012 was $33,315,006 ($90,812,593 for 2011). The market value at December 31, 2012 was $32,913,810 ($90,362,851 for 2011). 2. Accounts Receivable Property Taxes Other Governments General and Accrued Interest Development Cost Charges Less: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 2012 $ 6,577,801 $ 5,739,056 2,109,951 5.195.659 19,622,467 (158.327) $ 19.464.140 $ 2011 6,258,187 4,770,393 2,531,650 4,163,340 17,723,570 (176,100) 17,547,470 3. Recoverable Local Improvements The District provides interim financing for certain geographically localized capital projects. It recovers these amounts either from benefiting property owners or from provincial subsidies. Interest rates are established at the outset of the process and are a function of borrowing rates at the time. Repayment is typically made over fifteen years. As at December 31, 2012 the recoverable balance was comprised as follows: Recoverable from property owners 2012 2011 $ 1,853,310 $ 1,637,104 4. Pension Plan The District and its employees contribute to the Municipal Pension Plan (the Plan), a jointly trusteed pension plan. The board of trustees, representing plan members and employers, is responsible for overseeing the management of the Plan, including investment of the assets and administration of benefits. The Plan is a multi-employer contributory pension plan. Basic pension benefits provided are based on a formula. The plan has about 176,000 active members and approximately 67,000 retired members. Active members include approximately 35,000 contributors from local governments. The most recent acturial valuation as at December 31, 2009 indicated a $1,024 million funding deficit for basic pension benefits. The next valuation will be as at December 31, 2012 with results available in 2013. Defined contribution plan accounting is applied to the Plan as the Plan exposes the participating entities to actuarial risks associated with the current and former employees of other entities, with the result that there is no consistent and reliable basis for allocating the obligation, Plan assets and cost to individual entities participating in the Plan. The District paid $2,544,592 (2011 - $2,360,765) for employer contributions to the Plan in fiscal 2012, while employees contributed $2,127,243 (2011 - $1,946,622) to the plan in fiscal 2012. 5. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities Accounts Payable: General Other Governments Salaries and Wages Accrued Liabilities: Vacation Pay Other Vested Benefits 2012 2011 $ 4,235,394 $ 5,093,886 7,204,143 6,741,112 810,799 663,536 12,250,336 12,498, 534 304,050 379.883 264,805 379,133 683,933 643,938 $ 12.934.269 $ 13,142,472 6. Long Term Debt (Schedule 4) The District obtains debt instruments through the Municipal Finance Authority (MFA), pursuant to security issuing bylaws under authority of the Community Charter, to finance certain capital expenditures. Debt is reported net of Sinking Fund balances and interest expense is reported net of Sinking Fund earnings. The District carries no debt for others. Debt issued and outstanding as at December 31, 2012 was $42,086,722 ($38,505,484 for 2011). The following debenture debt amounts plus related interest are payable over the next five years: 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 $ 2,428,959 $ 2,465,754 $ 2,503,588 $ 2,542,491 $ 2,582,492 The District has the following authorized but un -issued long term debt as at December 31, 2012: L/A Bylaw L/A Amount Expiry Date #6558 $ 6,000,000 July 2013 #6560 275,000 July 2013 #6561 10,671,185 July 2013 #6679 1,100,000 September 2014 #6680 4,680,000 September 2014 $ 22,726,185 7. Other Assets Debt Reserve Fund: The Municipal Finance Authority of British Columbia provides capital financing for regional districts and their member municipalities. The Authority is required to establish a Debt Reserve Fund. Each regional district, through its member municipalities who share in the proceeds of a debt issue, is required to pay into the Debt Reserve Fund certain amounts set out in the debt agreements. The Authority pays into the Debt Reserve Fund these monies from which interest earned thereon less administrative expenses becomes an obligation to the regional districts. It must then use this fund, if at any time there are insufficient funds, to meet payments on its obligations. If this occurs, the regional districts may be called upon to restore the fund. Upon the maturity of a debt issue the unused portion of the Debt Reserve Fund established for that issue will be discharged to the District. The District has estimated that there is only a remote possibility that these funds will not be paid to it and therefore these funds have been included in Other Assets of $684,971 ($610,856 for 2011). 8. Employee Future Benefits The District provides employee future benefits in the form of severance benefits and vested and non -vested sick leave to qualifying employees. These benefits are not separately funded. Severance benefits are cash settlements paid to employees who cease their employment with the District after a specified period of time. Full time employees hired before February 11, 1999 qualify for five days pay per year of employment, provided they either work a minimum of 20 years with the District or retire as defined by the Public Sector Pension Plan Act. Full time employees hired after February 11, 1999 qualify for 20 days pay provided they work a minimum of 10 years with the District and retire as defined by the Public Sector Pension Plan Act. The District permits full time employees to accumulate up to 18 days per year of service for future illnesses up to a maximum of 250 days. For certain qualifying employees a portion of this benefit vests; for the balance, this benefit does not vest and cannot be converted to any other type of benefit. An actuarial valuation of these benefits was performed to determine the District's liability and accrued benefit obligation as at December 31, 2012. The valuation resulted in an unamortized actuarial gain of $2,600 ($700,900 loss for 2011) at December 31, 2012. Actuarial gains or losses are amortized over the expected average remaining service life of employees. The benefit liability at December 31, 2012 was $4,745,500, ($4,684,900 for 2011) comprised as follows: Benefit Liability - Beginning of the year Add: Current service costs Interest on accrued benefit obligation Less: Amortization of actuarial loss (gain) Benefits paid during the year Benefit Liability - End of the year Less: Unamortized actuarial loss (gain) Accrued benefit obligation - End of the year 2012 $ 4,684,900 396,000 187,500 69,600 (592,500) 2011 $ 4,411,500 341,900 213,400 44,500 (326,400) 4,745,500 4,684,900 (2.600) 700,900 4,742,900 5,385,800 Actuarial assumptions used to determine the District's accrued benefit obligation are as follows: Discount rate (long-term borrowing rate) Expected future inflation rate Merit and inflationary wage and salary increases averaging Estimated average remaining service life of employees (years) 2012 3.30 % 2.50 % 3.55 % 10.2 2011 3.40 % 2.50 % 4.55 % 10.3 9. Property Tax Levies In addition to its own tax levies, the District is required to levy taxes on behalf of various other taxing authorities. These include the provincial government for local school taxes, incorporated dyking districts located within the District and, organizations providing regional services in which the District has become a member. Total tax levies for 2012 of $102,750,611, ($98,359,060 for 2011) were comprised as follows. Municipal Tax Levies Levies for other authorities School taxes Greater Vancouver Transit Authority British Columbia Assessment Authority Greater Vancouver Regional District Dyking Districts Municipal Finance Authority Total Collections for Others Total Tax Levies 2012 $ 64,939,423 $ 30,103,736 5,500,420 896,645 816,431 491,107 2,849 2011 61,065,872 29,434,404 5,623,557 897,324 904,315 430,826 2,762 37.811.188 37,293,188 $ 102,750,611 $ 98,359,060 10. Contingencies, Commitments and Unrecognized Liabilities: (a) Third Party Claims Where losses related to litigation are possible and can be reasonably estimated management accrues its best estimate of loss. For 2012 this estimate is $502,816 ($458,860 for 2011). These amounts are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. There are various other claims by and against the District, the outcome of which cannot be reasonably be estimated. Any ultimate settlements will be recorded in the year the settlements occur. (b) Contractual Obligations (i) Water (a) The District has entered into a cost share agreement with the Greater Vancouver Water District for the construction of infrastructure. Under this agreement the District expects to incur costs of approximately $4,539,256 over the next 2 years. The liability is recorded as the related costs are incurred. (ii) Recreation and Cultural Services (a) In 1998 the District entered into an agreement to purchase ice sheet time for five years commencing in 1999, with a five-year renewal option. In August 2008, the District renewed the agreement for an additional five-year period. The minimum annual payment due for the provision of ice time is $609,225. These payments are recorded as expenses when the ice time is provided. (c) Unrecognized Liability The District holds shares in a non-profit organization that provides protective services to its members. Should the organization dissolve or management choose to withdraw from the organization the District would be liable for a proportionate share of any debt the organization held at that time. The liability is expected to be discharged over time through payments by the District and others for the provision of these services by the organization. Due to the ongoing operations of the organization the liability could only be quantified if the District chose to withdraw. Consequently no liability has been recognized in these financial statements. 11. Restricted Revenues Restricted revenues held by the District as at December 31, 2012 of $45,357,203 , ($41,042,622 for 2011) were comprised as follows: Beginning Balance Collections and interest Disbursements - operating Disbursements - capital Ending Balance Beginning Balance Collections and interest Disbursements - operating Disbursements - capital Ending Balance Development Cost Charges Actual Actual 2012 2011 Parkland Acquisition Charges Actual Actual 2012 2011 $ 35,660,974 $ 32,211,726 8,629,614 7,020,123 (2,086,325) (610,934) (2.662.518) (2,959,941) $ 39,541,745 $ 35,660,974 Other Restricted Revenues Actual Actual 2012 2011 $ 295,082 $ 252,785 11.606 $ 559,473 $ 295,082 162,355 166,482 (33,755) Total Restricted Revenues Actual Actual 2012 2011 $ 5,086,566 $ 4,802,418 209,270 295,212 (29,851) (11,064) (10,000) $ 5.255.985 $ 5,086,566 $ 41,042,622 $ 37,176,499 9,091,669 7,481,817 (2,116,176) (621,998) (2,660,912) (2,993,696) $ 45.357.203 $ 41,042,622 12. Prior Period Adjustments In 2009, the District adopted the provisions of Section 3150 of the PSAB Handbook and recorded the District's tangible capital assets, net of related amortization, as non-financial assets. During 2012, additional information became available about the Districts inventory of tangible capital assets and the financial statements have been retroactively adjusted. The change represents less than 1% of tangible capital assets. The impact of these changes was to: - Decrease opening accumulated surplus by $5,243,111 - Decrease closing accumulated surplus by $6,817,939 as follows: 2011 2011 (restated) (previously reported) Net Financial Position $ 22,339,124 $ 22,339,124 Tangible capital assets (book value) 801,626,175 808,444,114 Undeveloped land bank 14,832,041 14,832,041 Other non-financial assets 847,673 847,673 Accumulated Surplus $ 839,645,013 $ 846,462,952 - Decrease annual surplus by $1,574,829 as follows: 2011 2011 (restated) (previously reported) Revenues $ 134,315,519 $ 136,022,470 Expenses (expenditures) other than capital and 83,270,902 83,270,902 amortization Amortization expense 17,135,746 17,267,869 Annual Surplus 33,908,871 35,483,699 13. Tangible Capital Assets Net book value 2012 2011 (restated) Land $ 171,409,480 $ 163,775,804 Buildings 52,129,371 54,492,347 Transportation network 185,773,678 183,056,307 Storm system 163,640,326 159,840,958 Fleet and equipment 12,514,736 12,531,688 Technology 3,763,225 3,822,127 Water system 96,954,171 95,566,948 Sanitary system 115,537,232 115,907,266 Other 12,393,741 12,632,730 $ 814,115,960 $ 801,626,175 For additional information, see the Schedule of Tangible Capital Assets (Schedule 5) During the year there were no write-downs of assets (2011 - $Nil) and no interest was capitalized (2011 - $Nil). In addition, roads and related infrastructure, underground networks and land contributed to the District totaled $16,709,523 ($19,875,197 for 2011) and were capitalized at their fair value at the time of receipt. Works of art, artifacts, cultural and historic assets are not recorded as assets in the financial statements. The District controls various works of art and historical treasures including artifacts, paintings, sculptures and mosaics located at District sites and public display areas. 14. Budget Budget amounts represent the Financial Plan Bylaw adopted by Council on May 8, 2012. The Financial Plan anticipated use of suprluses accumulated in previous years to balance against current year expenditures in excess of current year revenues. The following shows how these amounts were combined: Financial Plan Bylaw Financial Statement Budget Revenue Taxation $ 65,038,017 $ 65,038,017 User fees and other revenue 35,086,269 35,086,269 Other 42,976,048 42,976,048 Contributed subdivision infrastructure 12,250,000 12,250,000 Total Revenue 155,350,334 155,350,334 Expenses Protective services 32,344,677 32,344,677 Transportation services 17,287,026 17,287,026 Recreation and cultural 21,635,975 21,635,975 Water utility 16,281,644 16,281,644 Sewer utility 10,059,710 10,059,710 General Government 15,584,156 15,584,156 Planning, public health and other 4,321,633 4,321,633 Total expenses 117,514,821 117,514,821 Annual Surplus $ 37,835,513 $ 37,835,513 Less: Capital expenditures 97,311,137 Debt repayment 4,438,689 Add: Interfund transfers 13,397,881 Amortization 18,015,247 Borrowing proceeds 32,501,185 $ - 15. Accumulated Surplus Accumulated Surplus is comprised of operating surpluses and equity in tangible capital assets held in the general, sewer and water funds as well as reserves. Accumulated surplus for 2012 is $862,218,440 ($839,645,013 for 2011) and is distributed as follows: Operating surplus (Schedule 1) Restated 2012 2011 General $ 6,091,162 $ 5,750,719 Sewer 3,139,776 2,508,311 Water 4.004.157 3,176,352 13,235,095 11,435,382 Equity in tangible capital assets (Schedule 2) General 572,957,588 561,498,185 Sewer 116,943,297 117,329,209 Water 98.005.903 96,474,772 787,906,788 775,302,166 Reserves (Schedule 3) Funds 29,908,836 25,144,547 Accounts 31.167.721 27,762,918 61,076,557 52,907,465 Accumulated Surplus $ 862.218.440 $ 839,645,013 16. Expenditures and Expenses by Object Goods and services Wages and salaries Interest Total Expenditures Amortization expenses Contributed tangible capital assets Operations 49,979,189 36,623,805 2,372,700 88,975,694 17,620,754 Capital Acquisitions 14,146,708 859,168 15,005,876 16,709,523 2012 Total 64,125,897 37,482,973 2,372,700 103,981,570 17,620,754 16,709,523 2012 Budget 155,909,168 38,106,533 2,795,009 196,810,710 18,015,247 12,250,000 Restated 2011 Total 71,681,325 35,934,163 2,391,798 110,007,286 17,135,746 21,582,148 Total Expenditures and Expenses 106,596,448 31,715,399 138,311,847 227,075,957 148,725,180 17. Undeveloped Land Bank The District owns property in various areas identified for future growth in the Official Community Plan. These properties are not currently used in the provision of service to the citizens of Maple Ridge. The properties represent a strategic, non-renewable resource available for the advancement of Councils' strategic plan. 18. Segmented Information This District is a diversified municipal government entity in the province of British Columbia that provides a wide range of services to its citizens. Municipal services have been segmented by grouping activities that have similar service objectives (by function) and separately disclosed in the segment report. Where certain activities cannot be attributed to a specific segment they have been reported as unallocated. The segments and the services they provide are as follows: Protective Services Protective Services is comprised of the Ridge Meadows RCMP detachment, the Maple Ridge Fire Department, bylaw enforcement, inspection services and emergency services. Services provided by the segment are focused on protecting the citizens of Maple Ridge. Transportation Services Transportation Services is comprised of Engineering, Operations, Drainage and Roads. Services provided by the segment include the construction and maintenance of transportation related infrastructure. Recreation and Cultural Recreation and cultural services provides library services, access to recreation facilities and maintains and operates District parks. Water Utility The Water Utility, in conjunction with Metro Vancouver, provides safe, clean, reliable water to the residents and businesses of the District of Maple Ridge. Sewer Utility The Sewer Utility collects waste water and transports it to treatment plants operated by Metro Vancouver in addition to maintaining the sanitary sewer infrastructure. General Government General Government provides administrative, legislative and support services for the District. Functions include financial planning and reporting, information technology, economic development and communications. Planning, Public Health and Other This segment is comprised of Planning, Recycling, Cemetery and Social Planning. Activities include land use guidelines, development of the Districts official community plan, management of the recycling contract and improving the social well-being of the community. Unallocated Unallocated includes revenues and expenses that cannot be directly attributed to the activities of an identified functional segment. THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE STATEMENT OF SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS There were two severance agreements under which payment commenced between the District of Maple Ridge and a non -unionized employee during the fiscal year 2012. These agreements represent 14 months of compensation.* *"Compensation" was determined based on salary. Prepared under the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, subsection 6 (7) (a) (b) The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Financial Information Act Statement of Financial Information Approval The undersigned, as authorized by the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, subsection 9 (3), approves all the statements and schedules included in this Statement of Financial Information produced under the Financial Information Act. Paull G II BBA, CGA GM Corporate & Financial Services (-11: fu l4 1(2 s' Date Prepared pursuant to the Financial Information Regulation, Schedule 1, Section 9 Management's Responsibility for Financial Reporting The information in this Annual Report is the responsibility of management. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian Public Sector accounting guidelines as outlined under "Significant Accounting Policies". These include some amounts based on management's best estimates and careful judgment. Management maintains a system of internal accounting controls to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and that transactions are authorized, recorded, and reported properly. Management also administers a program of proper business compliance. BDO Canada LLP, the Municipality's independent auditors have audited the accompanying financial statements. Their report accompanies this statement. Council carries out its responsibility for the consolidated financial statements jointly with its Audit Committee. The Committee meets with management on a scheduled basis and at least semi-annually with BDO Canada LLP to review their activities and to discuss auditing, internal control, accounting policy, and financial reporting matters. BDO Canada LLP has unrestricted access to the Municipality, the Audit Committee, and Council. Council approves the consolidated financial statements, the Audit Committee reviews the recommendations of the independent auditors for improvements to controls and as well as the actions of management to implement such recommendations. Paul Gill, CGA Jim Rule General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services Chief Administrative Officer 410* MAPLE RIDGE British Colombia TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: June 17, 2013 FILE NO: CDPR-06460-30 MEETING: Committee of the Whole Albion Sports Complex Water Park Tender Award EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Tenders for the construction of the Water Play Park at Albion Sports Complex, were received on June 10, 2013. A total of three bids which were in compliance with the tender documents were received. It is recommended that the tender be awarded to TGK Irrigation Ltd. RECOMMENDATION: That Contract PL13-35 for the construction of the Albion Sports Complex Water Play Park be awarded to TGK Irrigation Ltd. for $ 300,470.00 plus taxes and the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: At the Committee of the Whole Meeting of March 4, 2012 a report was received from the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services Commission which requested the Capital Plan be amended to reflect the new location for the proposed Water Play Park at Albion Sports Complex. This recommendation was approved by Council and staff proceeded with retaining a landscape architect to develop a design and tender documents for construction. In order to have this water park operating for use this summer, staff have followed a compressed schedule meeting the need to open the park by early September. Staff decided to reduce the tender period by a week and will pre -order some of the preferred play elements to reduce the delivery time on this equipment. The tender was issued May 28 and closed on June 10, 2013; three bids were received as compliant with the tender documents. b) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The three bids tendered for ITT-PL13-35: TGK Irrigation Ltd. (Recommended Bid) Fricia Construction Inc. CAP Ventures Ltd JC Installations Ltd. Each bid included Provisional Price Items. From TGK Irrigation Ltd.: 265,995.00 299,180.00 470,000.00 1151 a) Supply and Installation of Log Steppers: b) Substitute Concrete Work in Drainage Swale with Rock Runnel: Total contract value to award TGK Irrigation Ltd. Construction contingency (5% if required) Total construction budget $29,500.00 4975.00 $300,470.00 (plus taxes) 15,023.50 $ 315,493.50 The total construction budget can be accommodated within the existing budget for this project. Capital Project Number; LTC# 8193 CONCLUSIONS: Based on a staff review of the tenders received with the landscape architect, it is recommended that the contract for construction of the Albion Sports Complex Water Play Park be awarded to TGK Irrigation Ltd. "Original signed by Bruce McLeod" Prepared by: Bruce McLeod, MBCSLA, Manager Parks Planning & Development "Original signed by David Boag" Approved by: David Boag, Director Parks & Facilities "Original signed by Kelly Swift" Approved by: Kelly Swift, General Manager, Community Development Parks and Recreation Services "Original signed by Trevor Thompson" Approved by: Trevor Thompson, Manager Financial Planning "Original signed by Jim Rule" Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer :bmcl