Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-05-13 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA May 13, 2008 7. 00 p.m. Council Chamber MEETING DECORUM Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be reprimanded. Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 OPENING PRAYERS Pastor Henry Kriete, Open Door Church 300 INTRODUCTION OFADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS 400 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 500 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 501 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of April 22, 2008 502 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of April 18, 21, 24 and May 2, 2008 600 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL Page 1 Council Meeting Agenda May 13, 2008 Council Chamber Page 2 of 6 700 DELEGATIONS 701 Ridge Meadows Rustlers AAA Hockey Team - S. Levan, Team Coach 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 900 CORRESPONDENCE 1000 BYLAWS Bylaws for Final Readin 1001 RZ/104/04, S/E Corner 124 Avenue and 264 Street Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6497-2007 Staff report dated May 6, 2008 recommending final reading To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit subdivision into 8 lots Final reading 1002 Maple Ridge Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6569-2008 To update the 2008-2012 Financial Plan Final reading 1003 Maple Ridge Tax Rates Bylaw No. 6570-2008 To establish 2008 tax rates Final reading COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE 1100 Minutes - May 5, 2008 The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting. Council Meeting Agenda May 13, 2008 Council Chamber Page 3of6 Public Works and Development Services 1101 RZ/012/08, 24383 125 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-2 Staff report dated April 4, 2008 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6565-2008 to permit a 2 lot subdivision be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1102 RZ/116/07, 22491, 22505, 22515, 22525 Brown Avenue, RS-1 to RM-2 Staff report dated April 18, 2008 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6544-2008 to permit a four -storey 69 unit residential apartment building be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1103 RZ/041/06, 24221, 24281, 24361104 Avenue,.RS-3 to R-1 and RS-1 Staff report dated April 21, 2008 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6556-2008 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6557-2008 to permit a 36 lot subdivision be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1104 AL/022/08, 22974 132 Avenue Staff report dated April 23, 2007 recommending that application AL/022/08 to exclude 4.0 hectares of land from the Agricultural Land Reserve not be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission. 1105 DP/023/08, 12175 and 12157 224 Street Staff report dated April 1.4, 2008 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/023/08 in support of restoration works to Morse Creek. 1106 11th Annual Vistas Run Staff report dated April 7, 2007 recommending the use of municipal streets for the 11th Annual Vistas Run on Sunday, May 25, 2008. Council Meeting Agenda May 13, 2008 Council Chamber Page 4 of 6 1107 5th Annual Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation Fund Run Staff report dated April 21, 2007 recommending the use of municipal streets for the 5th Annual Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation Fund Run on Sunday, JuneI, 1008. 1108 Run the Ridge Staff report dated April 18, 2008 recommending the use of municipal streets for the Run the Ridge event on Sunday, June 8, 2008, Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police) 1131 Adjustments to the 2007 Collector's Roll Staff report dated April 18, 2008 submitting information on changes to the 2007 Collector's Roll through the issuance of PAAB Roll 13/2007. 1132 Alternative Approval Process for Loan Authorization Bylaws Staff report dated April 30, 2008 recommending that approval of electors for the loan authorization bylaws be obtained through the alternative approval process. Community Development and Recreation Service 1151 School Playground Funding Assistance Request from Maple Ridge Elementary School Staff report dated April 11, 2008 recommending that the request of the Maple Ridge Elementary School Parent Advisory Committee for funding assistance for their school playground equipment be declined. 1152 Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services Commission Bylaw Amendment Staff report dated April 21, 2008 recommending that Parks and Leisure Services Commission Amending Bylaw No. 6568-2008 to permit all members of the Commission to stand for election as Chair and Vice Chair be given three readings and that the Mayor and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign a revised Joint Parks and Leisure Services Agreement upon final reading of the bylaw. Council Meeting Agenda May 13, 2008 Council Chamber Page 5of6 1153 Funding Request from the Maple Ridge -Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association Staff report dated April 29, 2008 recommending development of a Fee for Service Agreement between the Maple Ridge -Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association and the District of Maple Ridge for•funding up to $12,000 each year for three years. Correspondence Other Committee Issues 1200 STAFF REPORTS 1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL Municipal Appointment to the Board of Variance (from the April 28, 2008 Closed Council Meeting) CUPE Deal (from the May 5, 2008 Closed Council Meeting) 1400 MAYOR'S REPORT 1500 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS 1600 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 1700 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING Council Meeting Agenda May 13, 2008 Council Chamber Page 6of6 1800 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC 1900 ADJOURNMENT QUESTION PERIOD The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. If a member of the public has a concern related to a Municipal staff member, it should be brought to the attention of the Mayor and/or Chief Administrative Officer in a private meeting. The decision to televise the Question Period is subject to review Each person will be permitted 2 minutes only to ask their question (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, it ,will be responded to at a later date at a subsequent Council Meeting. Other opportunities to address Council may be available through the Clerk's Department who can be contacted at (604) 463-5221. Checked by: `° - Date: o o . CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES April 18, 2008 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1, KONG, NELSON & SOPHIE LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 29, Section 29, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 35419 22591 132 Avenue Nelson & Sophie Kong Covenant - Floodplain THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO NELSON & SOPHIE KONG. -Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman CARRIED J.L. (Jim Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Mern 502 3 2 5 N a t Parcel 5 P 2892 P 35419 r112 29 8 26 9387 721973 1317 18 19 A a w 132 AV E. m w B _o a. 4 laps 0 N 112 1 District of Pitt Meadows "" ' 22591 132ave Silver Valley`"- } I � G CORPORATION OF w I D C1 _ .... THE DISTRICT OF N MAPLE RIDGE DIS[rict Of Albion LICENSES, PERMITS & BYLAWS DEPT. Langley m SCALE 1:2,618 a; DATE: Apr 2, 2008 FILE: Untitled BY: AS Rive CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES April 21, 2008 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. SD/077/07 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 10, District Lot 395, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan BCP10190 22017 124 Avenue Barbara Davison Servicing Agreement - Street Trees THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SD/077/07 Chairman u J.L. {Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Membe N v 8y2 12543 of 04 12521 32 N N 31 0 $� 41 b 125AAVE. N ry 29 28 (° 12537 04 PARK 12511 12598 3Q P to 72 13 so 42 12539 0 0 0 `cy N N P 72044 12501 P 72213 P 552 12531 52 53 54 a 2213 P 69552 24 23 43 1 � W 12525 1 25 12496 a "• �22 51 56 12491 12519 12520 12523 p HIGHVIEW PL. 57 12483 21918 45 11 yes 50 12515 N w �25 P 77868 9 zyg 21 y?spy 00 58 12475 a a 17 18 c' ''moo yq �` N 12505 PARK 812467 20 46 wry �"� N 48 49 59 19 47 81516 12495 7 i6 60 12459 12464 BCP 1019 12487 15 13 12 11 6 12456 6 5 4 3 2 1 LIVIF 44492 12451 n 167 16 5 4 3 2 1 n 69949 14 m ° SUBJECT PROPERTY m o o 6 1244$ 12450 N cv N N ry N N N o H N N N N cY tV fV 5 ISAAC CRE5. 12437 10120 o N m 7 A 12433 h N N N O ~ O Rem (n N 12420 N 8 N 9 10 7 N N 8 9 b O Q O O p O O O O N 8 N 9 N1a �11 �12 �13 N14 Nis N16 N N 4 6 BC 0190 164 166 12427 LMF 44 t92 3 5 695 2 12419 LMJ 277 2 10 LMP 40296 LMP 2 765 163 162 12415 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 4 3 2 i 2 4 3 0 2 ^� 1 Of m a n N r'i v)rn n r r Cl) m o 1249$ 12402 m N N N N m rn N N N N N N N N N N n LMP 15852 124 AVE. LMP 19870 LMP 15857 Rem m Rem ° Rem m 12399 12398 0 N 1 15 N N N N N N N N N c'u q B NBC Rem i86 187 188 N N N 267 268 Rem 12397 12396 5 185 P 371 1 1 76 2 14 355917 12395 y 12394 Rem 75 3 N 13 Rem 20 P 24098 N 12393 N 12392 A 4 12 12391 12390 20 Rem EP 14565 5 11 L i 122 10 e9 12 —j a- 20 16 P 28006 �2 269 7 ^ry S 9 20 21 P 55987 P 390 7 195 FARK.N 0 196 0 197 0 198 0 199 0 200 0 201 N N N N N District of Pitt Meadows 22017 124 AVENUE Si rvel! O N I N �,Yep ! CORPORATION OF HAMyj Ll ' N - THE DISTRICT OF po N MAPLE RIDGE . • RIDGE District Of ,�,�p ` ' I PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley grey SCALE 1:2,000 IOATE: Oct 24, 2007 FILE: VP/077107 BY: PC RNer CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES April 24, 2008 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. STRATA CORPORATION NW2885 (SOUTHWOOD HEIGHTS) Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary LEGAL: Lot S, District Lot 402, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan LMP10788 LOCATION: 11464 Fisher Street OWNER: Strata Plan NW2885 REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Access Agreement - slope remediation THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO STRATA CORPORATION NW2885 (SOUTHWOOD HEIGHTS). Gordon Robson,. Mayor Chairman CARRIED J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member r < i I , � Page--01--i—Pages a —1i"= I , I �• ` 1 E � n 11 I Lam. rr"il CQ I j �V b�Ol d00 ,pZ N O 'r h p q / £1£Sf U01d AbS N o �o to °0 0 0 00 h O G 9,V � C Q± R E LU J Q, I g c a 0 f =V � abi Q o y�.p p I b it�p�rl;lit_ END END OF Etta�� 6.S i EN' +y Cj V z Z a e O V42`.sUl 1 y W m � OLa b � e ti j c c I—teoc� i a� U CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES May 2, 2008 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Gordon Robson, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. SD/077/07 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 10, District Lot 395, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan BCP10190 22017 124 Avenue Barbara & Kerry Davison Discharge of Covenant BN339680 THAT THE MAYOR AND ACTING CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SD/077/07 Chairman CARRIED J.L. (Ji ) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member �72 12543 0 0 r 12521 32 N N 31 929 `p 41 125aa�e. � 28 12537 PARK 12511 12508 30 P 72 13 ° 42 1zs3o N N 04 12501 P 552 12531 52 53 54 co P 72044 2213 P 72213 P 69552 24 c, 23 43 t Q 25 m 12525 12496 a h 44 51 56 12491 �q 22 12519 12526 12523 � }tIGHVIEW PL. 57 12483 21918 45 �1 'aS 50 '4 `° 12515 r N m �q5 '2seg P 77868 9 ag 21 w 58 12475 N aim' �4 Q- 12505 17N 18 49 PARK 812467 p 20 46 N 48 59 19 47 81516 12495 7 16 60 12459 12464 BCP 1019 12487 15 13 12 11 6 12456 6 5 4 3 2 1 LM 44492 12451 rn 5 4 3 2 1 69949 14 SUBJECT PROPERTY n167 `16 o 6 12450 N N N N 12445 n tV N 5 ISAAC CRES, 12437 10120 0 o N M A 12433 a 7 n w W M n N N O N N n N N N to[NO N NN Rem N 12420 N N 90 NNry NNN N 11 12 13 15 16 4 6 BC 0190 164 105 12427 LMF 44 92 3 5 695 2 12410 LM 277 2 10 LMP 402 6 LMP 2 765 163 162 12415 1 2 3 t 2 3 4 5 4 3 2 1 2 4 3. 2^ 1 rn N M a n N rn W n n c W O rmi It M N N tN N p p o p O p N 12405 12402 N N ry N N N N N N N S3 N ( fY N N N N LMP 15852 124 AVE. LMP 19870 LMP 15857 Rem T Rem Rem � o 0 o N 12399 12398 v 1 15 Rem NCIO 186 N 187 N 188 N N N N N N N N N N A B 267 268 Rem 12397 12396 BC 5 185 P 371 1 1 76 2 14 559 7 Rem 75 12395 rj 12394 3 (n 73 Rem P 24098 20 N 12393 12392 N A 4 12 r Rem 12391 12390 20 EP 14565 5 11 122 10 -j Bg �2 a 20 P 28006 ti • 'r� '�388 269 7 M� M� 8 9 20 P 55987 P 390 7 195 PARKDistrict �� N 196 N 197 N 1.,N 199 N 200 N 201 of L7 Pitt Meadows �_. y ! 22017 124 AVENUE 511wrVaiNY _ is I N ! p CORPORATION OF o - ' THE DISTRICT OF - . MAPLE RIDGE N District of A46fon I PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley as. SCALE 1:2,000 � -� DATE: Oct 24, 2007 FILE: VP1077l07 BY: PG River Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Final Reading: Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6497-2007 S/E corner 124 Avenue & 264 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: May 6, 2008 RZ/104/04 COUNCIL Bylaw 6497-2007 has been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently granted 2nd and 31d reading. The applicant has requested that final reading be granted. The purpose of the rezoning is to permit the subdivision into 8 lots not less than 4000m2. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6497-2007 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on September 18, 2007. On September 25, 2007 Council granted 2nd and 3rd reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6497-2007 with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed prior to final reading: i) Road dedication as required; ii) Park dedication as required. The following applies to the above: The applicant has provided an acceptable road and park dedication plan to the District with a Letter of Undertaking guaranteeing registration of the plan at the Land Titles Office. 1001 CONCLUSION: As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that final reading be given to the bylaw. Prepared by ep Csikos 111 11 Pia n n i n Tecfn n icia n %nePicki ring, MCP, MCIP Dirgctor of Planning Approv' tf Fkc Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services 4�j Concurren : J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer JC/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A -- Bylaw 6497-2007 Appendix B - Subject Property Appendix C - Proposed subdivision -2- hppe d;x A DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE "yjF.V1TA01Ra.11 I R.Imoil] 0 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6497-2007" 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 8 Section 19 Township 15 Plan 8097 New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1402 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the .28th day of August, A.D. 2007. PUBLIC HEARING held the 18th day of September, A.D. 2007. READ a second time the 25th day of September, A.D. 2007. READ a third time the 25th day of September, A.D. 2007. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 2007. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER J� UP 19851 \ zs50 32 a.423 ho UfP 19951 LMP 19853 LIUP 26 0.45] ha. UAP 6975 � 27 UAP 8977 al 0.400 h., 29 bl jz�a LMP 5975 0.s36 nv��l WP 6977 28 �I 0.4a0 ho. 124 AVE. 3 2ftm. 4BCP 13955 /BCP 1393 — — BCP 13 8 91 _ — — — — — J vj" Q0 N lY77Y /Y32! F2247AS P 8097 6 ,555 h.. P 8097 7 I= h.. N 1/2 6 1.927 ha. P 8097 S 1/2 6 4827 >a, 12260 N 1/2 5 1.927 ha. 12240 A 1,085 ha. r22ra P 8097 S 70' 5 0.330 ha. 122M RP 10M Rem C 0.809 1w. MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6497-2007 Map No. 1402 From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) To: RS-2(One Family Suburban Residential) 1:4000 Subject• • • w�ilri�i=�r�31 ���� �-m / CORPORATION ... it 1 iVan IT t luia.�c' :� Jlt_ilh. � ri � ''—rrlli"_ ;IL "Tip THE DISTRICT OF ._ rvywa�►�� �ro�EMAPLE RIDGE Distdct of- &rittsh CntUmbiaPLANNING DEPARTMENT Langle= SCALE 401� ,4/pe)d/X 0 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6569-2008 A Bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Financial Plan Bylaw No. 6531-2007 WHEREAS, through a public process in an open meeting the business plans and resulting financial plan were presented; AND WHEREAS, the public will have the opportunity to provide comments or suggestions with respect to the financial plan; AND WHEREAS, Council deems this to a process of public consolation under section 166 of the Community Charter. NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw maybe cited as "Maple Ridge Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6569-2008". 2. Statement 1 attached to and forming part of Maple Ridge Financial Plan Bylaw No. 6531-2007 is deleted in its entirety and replaced by Statement 1 attached and forming part of Maple Ridge Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6569-2008. 3. Statement 2 attached to and forming part of Maple Ridge Financial Plan Bylaw No. 6531-2007 is deleted in its entirety and replaced by Statement 2 attached and forming part of Maple Ridge Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6569-2008. READ a fi rst time the 2811, day of April, 2008. READ a second time the 28th day of April, 2008. READ a third time the 281h day of April, 2008. PUBLIC CONSULTATION completed on the day of , 2008. RECONSIDERED and adopted the day of , 2008. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER ATTACHMENT: Statement 1 and Statement 2 1002 Attachment to Financial Plan Bylaw 6569-2008 Statement 1 Consolidated Financial Plan 2008-2012 (in thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 REVENUES External Revenues Development Fees Developer Cost Charges $29,606 $4,292 $10,279 Developer Specified Projects $0 $0 $0 Parkland Acquisition $199 $0 $200 Contributions from Others $4,467 $3,732 $4,110 Development Fees Total $34,272 $8,024 # $14,589 Property Taxes $47,654 $51,204 $54,941 Parcel Charges $2,204 $2,319 $2,440 Fees & Charges $26,559 $27,948 $29,451 Interest $1,695 $1,770 $1,770 Grants (Other Govts) $16,354 $2,001 $17,961 Property Sales $0 $0 $0 Total Fxternal Revenues $128,738 $93,266 $121,152 EXPENDITURES External Expenditures Capital Expenditures $94,088 $27,970 $46,840 Interest Payments on Debt $3,566 $4,329 $4,569 Other Expenditures $71,303 $67,627 $75,278 Total External Expenditures $168,957 $99,926 $126,687 CHANGE IN NET FINANCIAL POSITION ($40,219) ($6,660) ($5,535) PLUS: OTHER REVENUES Borrowing Proceeds $21,766 $10,776 $8,160 $7,669 $10,334 $0 $200 $8,689 $0 $200 $10,928 $16,558 $21,462 $58,904 $62,718 $2,571 $2,709 $31,092 $32,855 $1,770 $1,770 $6,126 $2,001 $0 $0 $117,021 $123,515 $35,099 $4,632 $74,456 $26,689 $4,490 $82,774 $114,187 $113,953 $2,834 $9,562 $5,250 $0 LESS: OTHER EXPENDITURES Principal Payments on Debt $3,867 $4,444 $5,521 $6,390 $7,074 TOTAL REVENUES LESS EXPENDITURES ($22,320) ($328) ($2,896) $1,694 $2,488 INTERNAL TRANSFERS Transfer from Reserve Funds Capital Works Reserve $3,881 $1,384 $2,276 $1,273 $1,680 Equipment Replacement Reserve $3,381 $1,725 $2,654 $1,735 $2,169 Fire Department Capital Reserve $6,469 $1,034 $70 $350 $950 Land Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Local Improverrient Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San itary Sewer Reserve $252 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfer from Reserve Fund Total $13,983 $4,143 $5,000 $3,358 $4,799 Less :Transfer to Reserve Funds Capital Works Reserve $855 $1,143 $848 $896 $937 Equipment Replacement Reserve $1,771 $1,889 $2,016 $2,085 $2,150 Fire Dept. Capital Aquisition $863 $185 $336 $472 $537 Land Reserve $26 $20 $20 $20 $20 Local Improvement Reserve $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Sanitary Sewer Reserve $80 $80 $80 $80 $80 Total Transfer to Reserve Funds $3,589 $3,317 $3,300 $3,553 $3,724 Transferfrom (to) Surpius (Own Reserves) $10,401 ($566) ($305) ($1,379) ($1,118) Transfer from (to) Surplus $1,525 $68 $1,501 ($120) ($2,445) Transfer from (to) Surplus $11,926 ($498) $1,196 ($1,499) ($3,563) TOTAL INTERNAL TRANSFERS $22,320 $328 $2,896 ($1,694) ($2,488) Revenue Proportions Attachmentto Financial Plan Bylaw 6569-2008 Statement 2 Revenue and Property Tax Policy Disclosure Statement 2 Revenue and Property Tax Policy Disclosure Revenue Proportions 2008 $ ('0008) pro 2009 $ r0005) % 2010 $ {'000s) % 2011 $ ('o0os) °ro 2012 $ ('00os) % Revenues Property Taxes 47,554 32% 51,204 49% 54,941 42% 58,904 48% 62,718 51% Parcel Charges 2,204 1% 2,319 2% 2,440 2% 2,571 2% 2,709 2% Fees & Charges 26,520 18% 27,909 27% 29,412 23% 31,053 25% 32,61.1 27% Borrowing Proceeds 21,766 14% 10,776 10% 8,160 6% 5,250 4% - 0% Other Sources 52,321 35% 11,795 11% 34,320 27% 24,454 20% 25,233 20% Total Revenues 150,465 100% 104,003 100% 129,273 100% 122,232 100% 123,471_ 100% Other Sources include: Development Fees Total 34,272 23% 8,024 8°% 14,589 11% 16,558 14°% 21,462 17% Interest 1,695 1% 1,770 2% 1,770 1% 1,770 1% 1,770 1% Grants (Other Govts) 16,354 11% 2,001 2% 17,961 14% 6,126 5% 2.001 2% Property Sales - 0% - 0% - 0% - 0% - 0% 52,321 35% 11,795 11% 34,320 27% 24,464 20% 25,233 20% Property Tax Revenue Distribution The change in distribution of tax revenue in a given year will be influenced by the amount of new construction in that property class. Historically in Maple Ridge residential growth has outpaced other classes. The tax rate is set by taking last years tax rate and dividing by the percentage change in market value of the class of properties and multiplied by the approved tax increase. The largest factor in changes to multiples is the difference in change in market values for properties in each class. Property Class Taxation Revenue ($'000s) Assesssed Vaule ('000s) Tax Rate ($'000s) Multiple (Rate/Res. Rate) 1 Residential 35,529 76.9% 10,508,969 92.20% 3.3808 1,00 2 Utility 387 0.8% 9,679 0,08% 40.0000 11.83 4 Major Industry 645 1.4% 16,923 0.15% 38.1099 11.27 5 Light Industry 1,457 3.2% 130,965 1,15% 1-1.1226 3.29 6 Business/Other 8,045 17.4% 723,308 6.35% 11.1226 3.29 8 Rec./ Non -Profit 21 0.0% 2,379 0.02% 8.7229 2,58 9 Farm 113 0.2% 5,214 0.051/o 21.7581 6.44 46,197 100.0% 11,397,438 100.0% Permissive Tax Exemptions Council has set policies around the use of permissive tax exemptions. They are Council Policies 5.19 though 5.24. The policies discuss Churches, Community Halls, Heritage Sites, Homes for the Care of Children and the Relief of the Aged, the Poor, the Disabled and the Infirm, Municipal Recreational Services, Private Hospitals and Daycares, Private School and Youth Recreation Groups. Council has adopted a revitalization tax exemption bylaw. The revitalization area and objectives for designating that area are noted in the bylaw 6402-2006, and the exemption program is detailed in bylaw 6412-2006. This tax exemption provides a financial incentive for higher density residential buildings, with an enhanced exemption if the building is 'green' (LEEDS Silver or better). For more details on what may qualify please refer to bylaws noted above. THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6570-2008 A Bylaw to establish tax rates for Municipal, Improvement District and Regional District purposes for the year 2008 WHEREAS pursuantto provisions in the Community Charter Council must, by bylaw, establish tax rates; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Tax Rates Bylaw No. 6570 - 2008". 2. The following rates are hereby imposed and levied for the year 2008: (a) For all lawful general purposes of the municipality on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for general municipal purposes, rates appearing in Row "A" of Schedule "A" attached hereto and forming a part hereof. (b) For the purposes of improving fire services the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for general municipal purposes, rates appearing in Row "B" of Schedule "A" attached hereto and forming a part hereof. (c) For purposes of the British Columbia Assessment Authority on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for regional hospital district purposes, rates appearing in Row "A" of Schedule "B" attached hereto and forming a part hereof. (d) For purposes of the Municipal Finance Authority on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for regional hospital district purposes, rates appearing in Row "B" of Schedule "B" attached hereto and forming a part hereof. (e) For purposes of the South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority (Translink) on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for regional hospital district purposes, rates appearing in Row "C of Schedule "B° attached hereto and forming a part hereof. (f) For purposes of the Greater Vancouver Regional District on the assessed value of land and improvements taxable for regional hospital district purposes, rates appearing in Row "D" of Schedule "B° attached hereto and forming a part hereof. 1003 Bylaw No. 6570 - 2008 Page (2) 3. The minimum amount of taxation upon a parcel of real property shall be One Dollar ($1.00). READ a first time on the 28th day of April, 2008 READ a second time on the 28th day of April, 2008 READ a third time on the 28th day of April, 2008 RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED on the day of 2008. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER ATTACHMENTS: SCHEDULES "A" AND "B" District of Maple Ridge Schedule 'A' to Bylaw No. 6570 - 2008 'Tax Rates (dollars of tax per $1,000 taxable value) 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 Major Light Business/ Recl Residential Utility Industry Industry Other Non-profit Farm A General 3.1902 37.7449 35.9613 10.4955 10.4955 8.2311 20.5314 Municipal B Fire Service Improvement Levy Total 0.1906 2.2551 2.1486 0.6271 0.6271 0.4918 1,2267 3,3808 40,0000 38.1099 11.1226 11.1226 8.7229 21.7581 District of Maple Ridge Schedule 'B' to Bylaw No. 6570 - 2008 Tax Rates (dollars of tax per $1,000 taxable value) 1 2 4 5 6 8 9 Major Light Business/ Rec/ Residential Utility Industry Industry Other Non-profit Farm A B.C. 0.0615 0.4787 0.4787 0.1944 0.1944 0.0615 0.0615 Assessment Authority B Municipal 0.0002 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0001 0.0002 0.0002 Finance Authority C South Coast 0.3381 2.7153 2.3410 2.1964 1.6770 0.3381 0.3381 BC Transportation Authority (TransLink) D Greater 0.0655 0.2293 0.2227 0.2227 0.1605 0.0655 0.0655 Vancouver Regional District 1rir-1 f•'1'V DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roets Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: April 4, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/012/08 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6565-2008 24383 125 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), to permit a two lot subdivision. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6565-2008 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii) The proposed west lot will require connection to municipal sanitary sewer or approval from the appropriate authorities for septic disposal and submission of a septic feasibility report; iii) A septic feasibility report will be required to examine the existing septic field for the proposed east lot. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Ernest H Buckle Owner: Ernest H Buckle, Ella P Buckle, and Iris C Rodgers Legal Description: Lot: 79, Section: 22, Township: 12, Plan: 43885 OCP: Existing: Estate Suburban Residential and Suburban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) 1101 Proposed: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation Estate Suburban Residential and Suburban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Estate Suburban Residential and Suburban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation. Estate Suburban Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion. Applications: b) Project Description: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 0.811 HA (2.0 acres) Ansel) Street and 125 Avenue Municipal Water and Septic S D/012/08 Application RZ/012/08 proposes to rezone the property located at 24383 125 Avenue from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). This application is in support of subdivision application SD/012/08, which is for a 2 lot subdivision. The proposed size of each lot is not less than 0.4 ha (approx. 1.0 acre). The applicant is proposing to retain the existing dwelling, which is located on the proposed east lot. The proposed west lot is part of a Local Area Service project for sanitary sewer; however, the east lot is located outside of the Local Area Service project and will not be serviced by sanitary sewer. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The west portion of the subject property is designated Estate Suburban Residential and the east portion is designated to Suburban Residential. According to the zoning matrix, both designations support the RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone. The policies also -2- state that the minimum parcel size for both designation is characterized generally by 0.4 hectare lots. Zoning Bylaw: The proposed 2 lot subdivision layout is compatible with the surrounding area and complies with the minimum lot width, lot depth, and lot area requirements of the RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone. However, the applicants would like to retain the existing dwelling which does not meet the minimum setback from the front lot line. Therefore a variance will be required to reduce the setback from the front lot line from 7.5 metres to approximately 5.5 metres. All other setbacks have been met. Subdivision Bylaw: The Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw's rural road standard for asphalt width is 7.0 metres; therefore, a development variance permit will be required to support the retention of the existing 6.0 metre wide asphalt rural road on Ansel] Street and 125 Avenue. The Engineering Department has determined that the roads in the area are adequate to provide for existing traffic and to provide for the proposed subdivision. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department reviewed the proposed development and provided their comments as follows: i. There is a Local Area Service project in this area that, if it proceeds, will provide a sanitary sewer connection to the proposed west lot only. The east lot and existing house will continue to use the existing septic tank/field system. The location of the existing system should be determined to ensure that it doesn't encroach onto the west lot and to ensure that the setacks to property lines are met. If the Local Area Service project does not go through to completion then the proposed west lot would have to dispose of sewage via septic tank/field as well. The proposed west lot would pay the Local Area Service costs as the proposed east lot isn't in the Local Area Service area. ii. The Local Area Service sewer construction will require a statutory right-of-way along the west boundary of the property. This will be arranged through the Local Area Service process. iii. The two proposed lots drain to the ditch on 125 Avenue. Any new construction will have to have the buildings and footings high enough so as to not be surcharged from drainage water in the ditch. Lot drainage will be directed by swale to the ditch. The applicants have signed the petition for the Local Area Service for sanitary sewer. The Engineering Department is currently reviewing the design of the project and anticipates that the construction will begin in the summer. If the applicants wish to obtain final reading for -3- Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6565-2008, the sanitary sewer service must be in place for the proposed west lot or the applicant will need to submit a septic feasibility report to ensure that the proposed west lot can be serviced by on -site services. There is existing on -site service for the existing dwelling on the proposed east lot. The applicant will be required to submit a septic feasibility report for the existing septic system to ensure that it meets the required setbacks of the Sewerage System Standard Practice Manual. CONCLUSION: The density of the proposed RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone conforms to the land use designation in the Official Community Plan and is consistent with the surrounding neighbourhood. It is therefore recommended that application RZ/012/08 be favourably considered and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6565-2008 (Appendix C) be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Preplre4K. 4dina66ng Planning Technician ppr ed ane ' ering, MCP, MCIP Direct of Plannin Approved b/r Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM:7" . Works & Development Services Concurrence:/Ch J. L. (Jim) Rule ief Administrative Officer AL/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Proposed Subdivision Layout Appendix C - Maple Ridge Zone Amendment Bylaw No. 6565-2008 WE N a 1 12665 of z 4 12640 B7 P 43885 2 P 72087 68 69 P 43885 12021 73 126 AVE. 126 AVE. c 12610 12551 2 82 1 12570 � M 12500 m P 72 85 ti a 2 m 125,55 SUBJECT PROPERTY 2550 12561 a 83 P 43885 12552 O7 � 75 7 a z 64 12 T 79 12530 12525 55 1 48 M 54 49 District Pitt Meadows ,_.. ri � �' [7SCALE1:2,500 Langley 125 AVE. N P 43885 53 12497 1 c n P 43885 76 12490 n a 1 12475 2 12460 M N n a 2 12447 12440 1 P 43885 a P 43885 f° 78 50 n 0_ 2 M � N N N 12420 r-- I 24383 125 AVENUE N , N L to CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE ion I� PLANNING DEPARTMENT o� DATE: Feb 12, 2008 FILE: RZ1012/08 BY: PC River �� flea _ei'ti- D Mire! 1-r It W in r� cc n y ❑ Q `°moo a •- j� 243 STREET q o ri p /ri � i cNn N 24250 ALo V 1�; SZ v 24307 C14 "p o co co 24308 E'P 54608 N 24325 84.61 -F� C14 C11 !v � o � � V ;P 24358 N >; rC 60,54 Cp rri z; a w a g O s 4 N m r ' A 24383 y a to V ANSELL STREET Appeid lx C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.6565-2008 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6565-2008." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 79, Section 22, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 43855 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1425 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER 2 ha. Ln 00 co .il 3 2 ha. T79 v 0.405 ha. 0.406 ha. P 7 685 2 0.406 h a. 125 AVE. co 7f LO a_ u' P 43885 53 ha. 0.810 ha. 80 0.812 ha. 00 79 0.812 ha. N 0. 12570 12555 0.4 12550 cn J J W a P ❑. 12530 P 4 72497 0.8 1 0.407 ha. 72490 cQ av 12475 0. 2 12460 0.407 ha. MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6565-2008 Map No. 1425 From: RS-3 (One Fami€y Rural Residential) To: RS---2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Iry 1:150D Deep Roots Greater Heights DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: April 18, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/116/07 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6544-2008 22491, 22505, 22515, 22525 BROWN AVE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential), to permit the construction of a four -storey, wood -frame, 69 unit residential apartment building. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6544-2008 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. i) Approval from•the Ministry of Transportation; ii) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; iii) Road dedication as required; iv) Consolidation of the development site; v) Removal of the existing buildings; vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking; vii) Registration of a Section 219 Covenant indicating the Green Building components that will be included on the final project design plans. 1102 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses North: South: East: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Maclean Homes Willow Ltd Graham Maclean Upland Project Designs Inc Lot: 11, 12, 13, 14 all of Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: 8679 Urban Residential Urban Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Single Family Residential RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential Commercial C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Commercial Two -Family Residential RT-1(Two Family urban Residential) Urban Residential Vacant, Single Family Residential, Multi -Family Residential RS-1(One Family Urban Residential), RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Urban Residential Vacant Multi -Family Residential 3504 mz (0.87 acre) Vehicular access from rear lane, main pedestrian access from corner of Edge Street and Brown Avenue Full Urban DP/116/07, VP/116/07 M! b) Project Description: The subject site is currently 4 separate lots, two of which are vacant and two that are single family residential. The site has two street frontages, Edge Street and Brown Avenue with a lane located at the rear (north) of the site. Application RZ/116/07 proposes to rezone the properties located at 22491, 22505, 22515, 22525 Brown Avenue from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit the construction of a four storey building containing 69 units. The site is located within the Regional Town Centre and will require a green building design covenant once the final design has been established. initially, this development has indicated that it will achieve 13 Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design credits based on the LEEDS rating system. The apartment units range in size from 60.5 M2 (651 ft2) to 90.3 mz (972 ft2) and include a mix of one and two bedroom units, with and without dens. The building is a four storey wood frame apartment structure over a one storey concrete basement parking level. An access ramp to the underground resident parking is located at the west side of the building off of the lane. The underground parking garage provides 97 parking stalls and there are 14 visitor surface parking spaces located at the rear of the building off of the lane. The proposed materials for the building are cultured stone at the base of the building with earth tone Hardie Plank siding with timber and cedar shingles as accent materials. This project takes advantage of the lot by featuring a prominent entrance at the corner of Edge Street and Brown Avenue with the rest of the building facing Brown Avenue. The proponent opted to have the highest turret as the feature element at the entranceway to try to emphasize the corner with a canopy covering the entrance along with lower turrets and balconies along the road frontage. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The property is currently designated Urban Residential on Schedule B of the Official Community Plan. The RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone correlates with this designation. Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan: The property is located within the Regional Town Centre and is identified as Apartments Housing on the Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan. To facilitate the implementation of the Concept Plan, Council has directed that it be used as a template for development, until the adoption of an area plan for the Regional Town Centre. Chapter 4 of the Concept Plan - Design Guidelines and Performance Standards, recommends that a variety of multi -family housing options be provided in the Town Centre, with an emphasis on ground - oriented units. Multi -family buildings are to have their primary fagade facing the public street and should incorporate elements that facilitate "eyes on the street" such as windows, doors, patios and -3- balconies that face the street. In addition, the Concept Plan recommends the reduction of the front yard setback to 4.5 metres and includes strategies to incorporate green building technologies into development proposals. The "green building" concept is a key principle of the Concept Plan to encourage smart, managed growth within the Regional Town Centre. The proposal aligns with the Maple Ridge Town Centre Concept Plan in the following ways: • The rezoning application is for a 4 storey multi-fami[y building, with a density of 1.48 times the lot area; • ground -floor units are located along Brown Avenue (south facing), all of which have direct access to the street. • The units facing Brown Avenue and Edge Street each contain a patio or balcony that also overlooks the street; • While a Development Variance Permit is required for the front and side yard setback to be reduced from the required 7.5 metres identified in the RM-2 Medium Density Apartment Residential zone, the building location reflects the recommendation for a reduced front lot line setback in the Concept Plan; • The applicant has submitted a report and checklist outlining which components from the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System they feel the project can achieve. The details of the components will be finalized in the Development Permit application stage. However, it is recommended that prior to Final Approval of the rezoning application, a Section 219 Covenant be registered identifying the final green building components that will be incorporated into the Development Permit and subsequent Building Permit plans. Zoning Bylaw: Part 6, Section 604(6)(a) states that all apartment and accessory residential buildings shall be sited not less than 7.5 metres from all property lines. The proposed building as submitted will require the approval of a Development Variance Permit. The development meets the 7.5 m rear yard setback to the east and exceeds the 7.5 side yard setback to the north. In an attempt to create a more engaged street frontage and increase the amount of usable open space on the north side of the property, the building is sited slightly southeast on the lot facing Brown Avenue and Edge Street. As such, a Development Variance Permit application has been received to vary the exterior side lot line and the front lot line which will be discussed in a future report to Council. Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw: The project includes a parking provision of 14 stalls on grade at the rear of the site for visitor parking corresponding to the required 0.2 supply rate required for visitor parking for multi -family residential zones. The project also supplies a single level of underground parking beneath the site providing 97 stalls for tenant parking, corresponding to a supply rate of 1.41 stalls per unit for tenants. Currently, the -4- Maple Ridge Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw requires that tenant parking be provided at a rate of 1.5 stalls per unit for all apartment uses so the proposal falls short of the bylaw requirement by 7 stalls. The reduction of these stalls is supported by a Parking Impact Study provided by Linheath Incorporated. A variance application has been received and will be discussed in a future report to Council. Development, Permits: This development is subject to a Multi -Family Development Permit as outlined in section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan. Accordingly, prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Development Permit must be reviewed and approved. A Multi -Family Development Permit is required for all new multi -family development on land designated Urban Residential. The purpose of a Multi -Family Development Permit is to enhance existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs and minimize potential conflicts on neighbouring land uses. An application for the Development Permit has been received and will be the subject of a future Council Report. Advisory Design Panel: The proposed project was reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel on March 11, 2008 at which time the following recommendation was made; That the Advisory Design Panel supports and commends the applicant on the quality of their presentation along with the sustainability criteria stated in the application and supports the proposed variances. The Advisory Design Panel made the following recommendations to go back to the Planning Department • Consideration of Storm water plan at the existing location; • Hydro klosk location to be reconsidered; • Consider the proportion of the bay to the roof and the soffit treatment; • The design element of the east elevation, - As the projects develops the LEEDs checklist can be explored for further points; • The sustainable issues continue to be developed through the design basis. The applicant has received these comments and will review the submission responding to the ADP comments. Responses to these comments will be the subject of the Development Permit in a future Council Report. Development Information Meeting: A development information meeting on February 26, 2008 at Willow Manner Care Centre was held by staff from McLean Homes. There were seven people in attendance and 3 completed comment sheets in favour of the project. None were opposed to this development. -5- d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has identified that all of the services required in support of the rezoning do not exist to the site. It will, therefore, be necessary for the applicant to enter into a Rezoning Development Agreement and post the required security to complete the necessary works prior to final reading. MO i;M111.114[97►A The proposed apartment building is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. It is therefore recommended that application RZ/116/07 be favourably considered and be given first reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. Prepared by: Jen Cslkos Plan-ing Technician ppro y.� Jan ,MCP, M C I P ,pliact6r of Planning c Approved�y Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works evelopment Services r, J. L. (Jim)"Rule Chief Administrative Officer JC/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Property Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw No.6544-2008 Appendix C - Building Rendering IMI �ppe4dx 12129 88 E 112 11 P 7875 E P 61324 P 7876 0 6 7 v 8 9 10 P1 N N 121 AVE. 0 04 N A 3 LMP 44378 12080 2063/65 B 112064 LO P 34533 9 0 a. o �t �t N 17 N 18 N 19 20 P f679 12085 P E679 15 14 13 100 12 11 ILO to N N N N N 12080 (00 LO 10 LO 11 L N N12 N 00 O LO N P 80 0 Subject Pro%C14 81 9 7 6 12060 I` ti 162 «' N BROWN AVE. � w RP 79869 w LO (0 ti w LO CD C"IN qNy N 4 0 5 6 LO 2038 P T081 *LM Rem. 302 P 46004 r 1200003 12018 LMP 19460 m M P 0) 303 A ti � P 44882 N N a *PP094 N DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD 0 District of Pitt Meadows - - 22491 /22505/22515/22525 Brown Ave S;Ivarva;;ey C o 0 CORPORATION OF Handy i a THE DISTRICT OF N ,,� MAPLE RIDGE + • � -Albion - District of �'., �'� a PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,� Langley SCALE 1:1,500 o DATE: Dec 27, 2007 RZ1116107 BY: PC River =I CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.6544-2008 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6544-2008." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 11, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 8679 Lot 12, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 8679 Lot 13, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 8679 Lot 14, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 8679 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1419 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER 61324 co I o I C.b P 7875 I rZi 6 N 7 10 0 9 r N I� rn h I ,� I N 8 h � P 20.1 se) r--t cn /65 cr 533 ry '09 174 0148 (LEASE) 1.904 hQ kF 121 AVE. N �17 �18 �19 20 P 8679 720a5 PO Ed LP 69873 20.1 10.1 12060 10 0 11 N M2 � 0 N D- P 8081 P 8081 9 8\ r,\7 ,� 72060 h N 162 BROWN AVE. O N N N w co 4 5 6 L( 12038 P 8081 LP Rem. 302 �i b 7200 P 45004 n Q9 CD M 0-) 20.1 i C 00 n DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6544-2008 Map No. 1419 From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment) 20.D 9 72078 L M P 19460 P 303 A P 44882 h *PP094 P 70955 o z- 1:1500 MAPLE RIDGE British CaLumhia Bell FROM: SUBJECT: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer DATE: April 21, 2008 FILE NO: RZ/041./06 ATTN: C of W First Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6556-2008-and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6557-2008 24221, 24281, 24361 104 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), to permit a 36 lot subdivision. This application will require an amendment to the Official Community Plan to update the conservation boundary based on the park boundary established for this proposal. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6556-2008 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and on- going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6556-2008 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a Development Information Meeting, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a public hearing on the bylaw; 3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6556-2008 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6556- 2008 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6557-2008 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; 1103 ii) Amendment to Schedule "A" & "C" of the Official Community Plan; . iii) A Statutory right of way plan and agreement must be registered at the Land Title Office: iv) Road dedication as required; v) Park dedication as required. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Pacific Land Resource Group Inc. Bluepine Development Ltd Lan Fan, Patrick Fan Legal Description: Lot: 1, Section: 10, Township: 12, Plan: 10921 Lot: 11 & Lot: 12, all of Section: 10, Township: 12, Plan: 60927 OCP: Existing: Conservation, Medium Density Residential Proposed: Conservation, Medium Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: R-1(Residential District), RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Conservation Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) Designation Conservation South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Designation: Medium Density Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Conservation, Medium Density Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Conservation, Medium Density Residential -2- Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: Site Characteristics Single Family Residential, Vacant Single Family Residential 5.025 NA (12.4 acres) 104th Avenue, new extension of 244th Street Full Urban SD/041/06, DP/041/06, VP/041/06 The entire subject property is approximately 5 hectares in size; however, the actual development area covered under this application is approximately 1.94 hectares (4.7 acres) in size. The new residential lots proposed are located at the centre parcel abutting 104th Avenue, while accommodating the two existing dwellings on the subject properties; one located on the west property line of the site and the other just east of the newly proposed lots for approximately 36 total lots. There is also an existing lean-to at the approximate center of the subject site on proposed conservation land that will be removed prior to subdivision. According to the District's mapping system, there are four known tributaries of Spencer Creek on the subject properties. Spencer Creek is identified on Schedule C - Natural Features Map of the Official Community Plan. There are also significant slopes located on the property in the riparian area. The riparian protection area will be dedicated to the District as Conservation as a condition of zoning the site. Approximately 3.08 hectares (7.6 acres) will be dedicated to the District for Conservation purposes. Development Proposal The applicant is proposing to rezone a portion of the subject property to allow for approximately thirty-five R-1 (Residential District) lots no less than 371m2 in size and one RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) lot no less than 668m2 in size. The RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) lot is being proposed to allow the existing house to remain while still providing the required park dedication for protection of the slopes of the watercourse. It is the intention that this lot, located west of the creek tributary, will redevelop with the adjacent lands to the west in the future which will come before Council in a separate application. This lot is unable to remain RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) because this zone requires a minimum lot area of 0.8 hectare (2 acres) and would not allow for adequate dedication for the protection of the natural features area. To preserve the watercourses located on the property the applicant will be dedicating approximately 3.08 hectares of land as Park located on the northern, western and east -central portion of the property which will be designated "Conservation" on the Official Community Plan. Access to the proposed subdivision will be off of 104th Avenue and a new extension of 244 Street that will be built to gain access to the internal lots not facing 1041h Avenue. There is an existing multi -use trail located on 104th Avenue. The development proposes to relocate this trail off of 1041h to the north of the proposed subdivision within the conservation park boundary. WE This trail features a permanent connection extending westward where the adjacent lands can continue with the trail upon re -development. A temporary trail connection returning to 104 Avenue will be provided by the applicant until that westward connection can be realized at which point the temporary access will be decommissioned. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject properties are subjectto the Albion Area Plan of the Official Community Plan. The site is designated Medium Density and Conservation. The proposed R-1 (Residential District) zone correlates with the Medium Density designation of the Albion Zoning Matrix. It will be necessary to include a larger area, from the northern, eastern and mid -western portion of the site, into the Conservation designation. This is based on the actual environmental and geo-technical assessment for the area. The conservation area will provide the protection for the Spencer Creek tributaries found in this section of the subject property. Zoning Bylaw: A preliminary review of the proposed subdivision plans in relation to the Zoning Bylaw requirements has revealed the need for one variance, lot depth for proposed Lot 10. This lot is the corner, triangle -shaped lot where depth is calculated perpendicular from the front yard setback line and not actual the length of the side lot line. As such, a Development Variance Permit application has been received to vary the following: 1. The minimum lot depth from 24 metres to approximately 21.5 metres for Lot 10. Develooment Permits: The site is subject to Watercourse Protection Development Permit. As per Section 8.9 of the Official Community. Plan, it will be necessary for the applicant to obtain. a Watercourse Protection Development Permit prior to any works occurring within 50 meters of the top of bank of any of the tributaries of Spencer Creek. The applicant will be providing park land dedication for the riparian area for protection of this watercourse as a condition of rezoning the site. The Development Permit will ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas and a Security may be taken as a condition of issuance of the. Development Permit to uphold the conditions outlined in the permit. The applicant will be providing park land dedication for the riparian area for protection of this watercourse as a condition of rezoning the site. Development Information Meeting: A development information meeting on February 20, 2008 from 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm at Albion Elementary School was held by staff of Pacific Land Resource Group Inc. There was a total of 11 people sign -in and 8 completed comment sheets. Attendees were in mixed favour of the project. Three main issues were expressed: Access to the multi -use trail from 104th, development density, and the safety and capacity of 104 Avenue. -4- Multi -use trail In previous plans, the multi -use trail ended at the eastern property line of the subject properties. This has now been amended and the trail exits onto 1041h Avenue. Development Density The proposed R-1 (Residential District) zone is the "in-between" density of the two zones across the street. It is slightly more dense than RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) but less dense than R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District). Where facing the RS-1.b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) zone across the street, the proposed.lots have been widened to a 15m frontage to create consistency. The proposed R-1 (Residential District) zone correlates with the Medium Density Residential designation of the Albion Area Plan. 104 Avenue Upgrades A subdivision triggers upgrades to the frontages of the subject property. For this development road upgrades are required along 104th Avenue. The "developer will be required to widen the road to feature a 11.6 m carriageway with a boulevard, sidewalk, street lighting, curb and gutter on the north side of the road. These features will contribute to the pedestrian and vehicular safety of the area. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has identified that all of the services required in support of the rezoning do not exist to the site. It will, therefore, be necessary for the applicant to enter into a Rezoning Development Agreement and post the required security to complete the necessary works prior to final reading. Fire Department: A referral was sent to the Fire Department and they have no concerns with the development as proposed. Environment Department: Four tributaries of Spencer Creek are located on the subject property and have a required 30 metre setback from tap -of -bank. It is the intention to dedicate the environmentally sensitive area located within the environmental protection setback area to the Municipality as park. As part of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit the applicant will be required to provide an environmental assessment. The focus of the environmental assessment will be to providing an enhancement and restoration plan for the riparian area, mitigation measures for possible retention and replacement of trees, recommendations for timing of the construction works, and a conceptual Stormwater Management Ilan that meets the current watercourse protection bylaw requirements. 901 e) School District Comments: A referral was sent to School District No. 42 on February 25, 2008; no comments have been received from this referral. f) Intergovernmental Issues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. CONCLUSION: As the proposed development complies with the Official Community Plan, it is recommended that this application beifavourably considered and be given first reading and forwarded to Public Hearing. Prepared by: n Csikos P anning�echnician `` I A proved e�keri Dyed or of Pla ApprovedtSy: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Pub c-Works & Development Services ti Concurrence: I J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer JC/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Property Appendix B - Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6556-2008 Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw No.6557-2008 Appendixo - Subdivision Plan PARK 142 s° ' s 13$ 160 ,¢ 8CP 8153 Al7 -/ 1 C ( 1/L j�i p N a q T 1��a 137 a�5 143 �05n9 ��° 158 ro°� 155 0 125 101 1 00 108 I , 144 �o5o'z ' 159 ao& 2a355 jp505 126 99p 9 GP 145 �Ays�54 7g 10507 10259 109 e o 110 N a�� �Y 122 �ps0p 127 A 14fi°56' ,9 �' qS E- o 153 121 10509 103 ° 9q� n A 147 �p5y5 Ota 112 8� N 152 120 �O2 128 129 104 ,�g �dg ° � �05�$ 113 148 a c 5 150 151 5 a1 5gQ 10h gG 19 118 y Zp � 105 yti h� 10 114 "' 149 0�' '16 N'^ 117 o 0 ��o as9y to ti 130 � \d` 106 o" 115 ori N o WEAVE. 131 m aq`�q Oh� 107 X "p1Ar o eP a c 136 N133 \ \\y 135 134 B P 59 132 PARK P 666 4 J P 1 921 P 60927 P 60927 P 31591 SUBJECT PROPERTIES 14 15 1 11 --- 12 10 N N N N N N N 1 2 3 CfpN 53 1 §2 7 8 9 10 11 u~ 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 m N !� A tg O D N M N N N N N N N N N N 103 AAVE. 38 M N N N N N N 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 29 30 31 32 33 34 BCP 35192 P 41519 PARK 104 AVE. o N rNi `� N N ccpp N 10390 w N cNc�ii N Cg 35 36 37 38 39 40 Rem. 41 ' 2 3 4 5 BC 1 98 BOP 93 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 23 22 t0375 6 8 N �3 21 10386 7 r7" 7 `dry M N H n a ry .10365 103s8 8 E 133' B 7p'S 103AAVE. 10350 9 fi 29 28 17 20 1o3az 10 M 70349 10352 10347 0360 10345 11 a 00 '! 30 27 18 10332 d 0345 10348 31 10343 26 0346N 19 10326 12 7 �339 N 3 10342 iC337 r ¢ 0340 Cl) 10333 ��" 10335 2 i63531 N 03: 0 03132 33 0 24 21 a-to302 10327 10330 U 10325 2228U 14 1 34 m 23 10321 10324 N 10319 22 0320 1 a- m10303 103 AVE. 103AVE. 7 0 C 24221, 24281 & 24361 104 AVENUE E2 L to U CORPORATION OF f o THE DISTRICT OF - MAPLE RIDGE Ion PLANNING DEPARTMENT i a DATE: Apr 18, 2008 FILE: VP/041/06 BY: PC fiiver CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.6556-2008 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "A" &'V' of the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw maybe cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6556-2008 2. Schedule "A" Section 10.2 Albion Area Plan, figure "Albion Area Plan" (Chapter 10 & 6) is hereby amended for that parcel to that tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 11 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 60927 New Westminster District. And Lot 12 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 60927 New Westminster District. And Lot 1 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 10921 new Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 751, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby redesignated to Medium Density Residential and Conservation (shown hatched). 3. Schedule "C" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 11 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 60927 New Westminster District. And Lot 12 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 60927 New Westminster District. And Lot 1 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 10921 new Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 750, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding and removing Conservation. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 200. READ A SECOND TIME the READ A THIRD TIME the day of day of RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the A MAYOR , A.D. 200. A.D. 200. day of I , A.D. 200. CORPORATE OFFICER h\ 6A 07 At A ds 1 o a 5 8 5 1dy2�1 113 js1148 N 15 e �C 3 h�1h 94 g5 1 ti m 105 y�� tiry 0 1 1 149� 1 1 6 1 1 0 a 130 n 115 c> w 105 AVE. 131Um 10 N 8 136 0 ry13 _ _ \ 13 13 132 — - \ B P 98 PARK BCP 599 0.698 ha RW 66539 66584 921 9 P 60927 P 31591 15 11 1 10 ho 0.642 ho 1.7 a 0.959 ho 2.2 h 0.809 ho � N � 7 O N ti N h ry 104 AVE. ry 11 Imvry 7-7,l� ry 35ti 36N 37 38N1I 3 4(h R4 Baryro Pmry 3�ry�ary8 6 m BC 349 O7 BC 1 *PP017 � 9 8 11 l 23 22 10379 6 a �°, lkllid 2137 38 Q 7 ���ryLkry h h ry ry 103s5 703598 E 1 33 ' B r�3S,3- 103 A AVE. 1D350 9 n 6 7034 29 28 17 2p 103421 U rn P 1519 0.352_ _ 50.34 30 fli5(1 _ 18 > 4 u~i rn 19 a 10.i321 i cc) °o 5 a 3 7034 r� 4 O� 709i Qi4B_ _Pam F F 31 r7 w p i45 _ 19 "� `r �0 N 18 IOi261 4 Z D742_ � 40-u ¢ r� Q 20 ) 10329 0 17 JD378 0.809 ho 0.809 ho 0.809 ho ID3.i N 0� a 33 24 N 03.30_ U 1032 aU4_ 21 a 0 U U ID321 16 70302 IO.i>3 1 qrd 0.61 1 h❑ IL 2 U IO.J2 7022 150305 1032 10324 f0319 cn MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6556-200B Maly No. 751 From: Medium Density Residential and Conservation To: Medium Density Residential and Conservation(shown hatched) 1 :2500 ha e o 1g1 A�[F 105 �81 A , 110549 a 151 Gj� 1 13 $ 6C rj 8 0 1h 5a5 1 1 sp Za g OD sr� ti0h ;05 cS� 148 150� P 1 1 ryh� A 105D 1 gtih N 1 1 149� 116 1 a o 130 \ ? 52 0 5 ,oh 1 15 0 „ , 105 AVE. 131(-) o m P�`0E ^ ^ N � 99 �\ \ 136 ry13 13 13 132 -- \ e P 98 \ \ — PARK BCP 599 D.698 ha RW 66539 66684 921 9 P 60927 P 31591 15 11 1 10 ha 0.642 ha 1.7 a 0.959 ha 2.2 h 0.809 ha m � O ry N � m 7 O 04 AVE. N nt v a 1 a k 10390j rn NSF vr2 ne �e ry I ry ryN h CL Nry v ry �, r N N ry �I ry 35 36 37 38I Im3 4C� q4 s� P 36 Hal°' BC 349 °' BC 100 *PP017 `r 8 9� 1q 1 1^ 1\ i' lq 23 22 fo376 6 N v v h 21 f 67 F 37 38 7 ��'9 ry h ry ry ry ry N ti 10365 l035B8 E 133' B 103 A AVE. IOJ50 9 r 6 1034 29 n i5�— 28 17 �n �e n �sQ_ 20 103421Cp� I 4 0 co m IL P 1519 5 l034 30 4,W— — —.,o.34 19 a l03321 1 (o N co to 4 � 31 r � 26 ti$-Z1Q,.L3 aJ0�2913033 32 jtqi4,6— r, 25 a17N032!0.809 ha 0.809 ha 0.809 ha U 10-T2 / U 1032 J3>3 1 0.611 ha I0324 f0379 150305 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6556-2008 Map No. 750 PURPOSE: [] TO BE REMOVED FROM CONSERVATION ON SCHEDULE C ® TO BE ADDED TO CONSERVATION ON SCHEDULE C 1:35d0 APrefd;x C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.6557-2008 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6557-2008." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 11 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 60927 New Westminster District. And Lot 12 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 60927 New Westminster District. And Lot 1 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 10921 new Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line are hereby rezoned to R-1(Residential District) and that portion shown hatched is hereby rezoned to RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) as shown on Map No. 1423, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw. 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "1423" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the MAYOR day of , A.D. 200. CORPORATE OFFICER \ A 37 0 0�� cF 10y28 173 10' 14$ +� 1 50� Q gG 1 1 1 1 �r� bh tik�k 9 rn 66539 1010 011 149UZI� 116 01 ti 130`f1 \ phti�y� 10 5 , �� 115 0 `y , o 105 AVE. 1310 m �0h� 107 9AKER p N m ?g3� 9R \ 136 q ry s 13 13 13 132 \ B P 98 \ PARK 9CP 599 RW 66539 P 66 84 P 10921 P 60927 P 60927 P 31591 14 15 1 11 \2,2 10 0.842 ho 0.642 ho 1.7.96 ho - 0.959 ha 0.809 ha h N h ry 104 AVE. N q a 1039D2;A 1h135 36 37 2 3 4 5a3$ B P 36 8mlBC X�349KP IlOJ7S *PP017 8 0 10 1 6 21 103as7 E r 37 38 7 ��,h ti rOJss 10-W83 E 133' B 103 A AVE. 9 Ln / 034 29 28 17 20 1 4 1o34z 1 n 62 n ul Q a P 41519 5 1034 30 X 27 IU4B_ CN_In14 r 18 tn m 19 6_ Cn10 1 103321 1 - m 4 M 4 to 31 M 6 N 19"'��1 ORE 0_ Z m T033 r� 3 034?_ 1 q 32 rn 25 n 19129 20 r a 17 103181 405 ho 0.809 ha 0.809 ho 0.809 ho T033 0- 2 N a=- _ Ja U fl. p U w In? T4 _ U 10J21 g U 1 /OJIJ T 0.67 1 ha iO3 22 15 1032 T0324 >03I9 2 M. t103 AVE. 103 AVE. n MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6557-2008 Map No. 1423 From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) To: R-1 (Residential District) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) (shown hatched) 1:2500 Aope-f)diX D d n - V C Q9 F p n V o u N s g�c O CD m 0tm p� c w qa O 0 ncl P u im �a o U r o Q $e5 Q Qa 6 m w� V G z D Sgg o o i 8 PRE � } O z� o Z z o u� w w • z � � m � w w � 6 V ❑ q w ❑ 0 b '44 g26E� f M n cYR MK 3' - 82yyL FF 3 r� ,3•a• GB ' �S S �g 8 yy obi LL'E E9 its 99 sded 0. L MAPLEi DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: April 23, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: AL/022/08 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Application for Subdivision within the Agricultural Land Reserve 22974 132 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received under Section 21(2) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act to subdivide 4.0 hectares (9.8 acres) of land that is within the Agricultural Land Reserve. The Applicant's submission conforms with the notice of application requirements of the Agricultural Land Commission. RECOMMENDATION: That Council not forward application AL/022/08 to the Agricultural Land Commission. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses North: Use: Zone: Designation: South: Use: Zone: Designation: Robert Stewart Robert Stewart Lot: 3, Section: 29, Township: 12, Plan: 3726 Agricultural (91 %) and Estate Residential (9 %) No Change RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) No Change 4 properties, 2 rural residential, 2 farm assessed status RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Agricultural 2 properties, 1 rural residential, 1 strata lot shared property. RS-3 One Family Rural Residential and RG-2 Suburban Residential Strata Zone Agriculture and Estate Residential 1104 East: Use: Rural Residential Zone: RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Designation: Agricultural West: Use: Rural Residential Zone: RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Designation: Agricultural Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: b) Project Description: Rural Residential No Change 6.0 Hectares (14.83 acres) 132" d Avenue Municipal water The applicant wishes to subdivide the subject property into three parcels, as follows: 2 parcels within the Agricultural Land Reserve with parcel sizes of 2.8 hectares (7 acres) and 2.04 hectares (5 acres). The 0.5 hectare (1.25 acre) portion of the property that is designated Estate Residential will be subdivided along the boundary of the Agricultural Land Reserve. The applicant proposes to donate this portion to the municipality. The intention of this development proposal is for residential purposes. This proposal conforms with the minimum parcel sizes of the RS-3 One Family Rural Residential Zone. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan On November 14, 2006, Council adopted the Official Community Plan, which contained supportive agricultural policies. As part of this process, Council committed to creating an Agricultural Plan to address land use issues within the rural area and the Agricultural Land Reserve. The merits of this application will be viewed within this policy context. Section 6.2.2 Sustainable Agriculture. Policy 6-12 states: Maple Ridge will protect the productivity of its agricultural land by: a) adopting a guiding principle of "positive benefit to agriculture" when making land use decisions that could affect the agricultural land base, with favourable recognition of initiatives including but not limited to supportive non -farm uses, infrastructure improvements for farmland, or the inclusion of land elsewhere in the Agricultural Land Reserve; b) requiring agricultural impact assessments (AIAs) and Groundwater Impact Assessment of nonfarm development and infrastructure projects and identifying measures to off -set impacts on agricultural capability; c) preserving larger farm units and areas by using appropriate buffers such as roads, topographic features, watercourses, ditching, fencing, or gradually reduced residential densities on properties adjacent to agricultural land, -2- d) discouraging the subdivision of agricultural land into smaller parcels, except where positive benefits to agriculture can be demonstrated; e) reinforcing the concept that the Agricultural Land Reserve is intended for agricultural use by increasing the minimum lot size for ALR properties that are zoned Rural Residential, f) encouraging the amalgamation of smaller parcels of farmland into larger, more cohesive parcels. The applicant has not assessed this proposal on the basis of the guiding principle of "positive benefit" to agriculture. Policy 6-:.2 also emphasizes the importance of discouraging the subdivision of agricultural land into smaller parcels, increasing the minimum parcel size of ALR properties with Rural Residential zoning, and amalgamation to create larger farm parcels. One of the concerns noted around the subdivision of agricultural land is that further subdivisions tend to increase speculative activity within the Agricultural Land Reserve, thereby increasing the market value of farmland, and exacerbating the issue of economic barriers to entry for new farmers. Appropriate parcel sizes for the RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) zone may also be reviewed through the Agricultural Plan process. Currently, the minimum parcel size in this zone is 0.8 hectares (2.0 acres). This zone pertains to most of the land that is within the Agricultural Land Reserve, including the subject property. The RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) zone pre -dates the creation of the Agricultural Land Reserve. Although designated for agriculture, there is a concern that this historic zoning contributes to the perception that farming is not the primary use of this zone. For the above noted reasons, this application should be considered inconsistent with the Agricultural policies of the Official Community Plan. d) Interdepartmental Implications: If this application is ultimately successful, and receives Agricultural Land Commission approval, the applicant will have to apply for a subdivision through the municipality. Through this process, the applicant will have to'demonstrate that both of the proposed lots will have on -site septic capability to current standards. In addition, both properties must comply with municipal requirements with respect to lot geometry, road frontage and parcel size. The property is traversed by 2 watercourses. The District's usual practice for protecting natural features is through an amenity covenant which will be a requirement of any subdivision application. Commission approval is required prior to the registration of any restrictive covenants within the Agricultural Land Reserve at the Land Titles Office. If this proposal is successful, the applicant proposes to donate to the District the portion of the property that is outside of the Agricultural Land Reserve. The involvement of the Parks and Leisure Services Department would be required at that time. -3- e) Alternatives: The staff recommendation is not to forward this application to the Agricultural Land Commission. If Council decides to forward this application, the Commission will evaluate its merits, and make their decision accordingly. CONCLUSION: This application has been assessed for its consistency with the policies of the Official Community Plan, and its implications for the Agricultural Plan. The application is found to be at odds with this policy framework. On this basis, the staff recommendation is not to forward this application to proceed further to the Commission. ZQ Prepared by: Diana Hall P ner 1 (App�qyed'-bWape-MG4�en - MCP, MCIP Director of Planning ,E Approved byl Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. L.101m) Rule Administrative Officer DH/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix 1 Subject Map Appendix 2 Applicant's Subdivision Proposal Appe'ndixl Sub ect Map A w a rz a 6 m pm G r, •n Cf '✓ C, P © O 4 P 02 AVI- N W N N tV O Nf { l:• } qq I el36 t P 65045 ^ •, f SUBJECT PROPERTY P 15 i Rem 2 3 P 37 C I b i ram. as s° CP I P IF� /1 yt /11 avJv IS3�S ar'7 SL 14 SL 15 r I • +'� � ;' SL 16 I 7 i' t r SL 13 Disl.rict of -I Pitt Meadows 22974 132 AV E N U E CORPORATION OF .;�' p THE DISTRIC . - i ._ ,.. T OF MAPLE RIDGE A{6{o District off, --� _ j �, PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley [' sm.•,:. + I SCALE 1:2,500 t. I—� .L]- DATE: Mar 5, 2008 FILE: AU022108 BY: PC AApplicant's subdivision Proposal BCP 22 5 eca 22575 A i 1.W ha n VA a. 132 AW- Subject Property � F 1 Q F7 36 Omg ha 1.3w hd P 7 12 P W045 1.37"7 ha P 22794 N # � 1.214 h0. 999 H Rem A Rem 2 4, i P M26 t,3 C SECT. 29, 12 I E P 5471 / SL 12 12SM SL 11 P 80046 0.9ao hil, SL 10 rf J� 6 inS Imo"' 0.415 ha 1 CP NATURAL XVVARY ����� a SL 9 SL $ H ��ACt UMC ' RW 70543 / , P 2;1 Ri ` `, i 1 1 NWS Appendix 2 Continued Robert H. Stewart 23597 40P Avenue Langley, B.C. V2Z 2K1 Tel: 604-534-2281 March 6, 2008 District of Maple Ridge, To Whom It May Concern: I am not a land developer. I am a Commercial Fisherman. I have owned this land for ten years. I love the river and I want to retire on the property. I would like the opportunity for one of my children to live next door to me. I am not the first to divide these properties as all the properties in the neighbourhood have already been subdivided into two or three properties. I think I am unique in being the last to subdivide in this neighbourhood. The staff at the municipality have been very helpful in answering all my questions in regards to the procedures required in this matter. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely: Robert H. Stewart MAPLE RIDGE British ColumbiaDISTRICT OF MAPLE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: April 14, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: DP/023/08 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Watercourse Development Permit 12175 224 ST and 12157 224 ST. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Watercourse Development Permit application has been made for subject property located at 12175 224 Street and 12157 224 Street. Given recent legal action by the District on this property for destruction of the Morse Creek stream bank it is prudent that this Watercourse Development Permit be referred to Council for approval. The Watercourse Protection Development Permit Area was established for the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. The applicant is proposing to perform restoration works to Morse Creek; which runs along the west portion of the subject property. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/023/08 respecting property located at 12175 224 ST and 12157 224 ST. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Zoning: Existing: Surrounding Uses North: Use: Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: JAGDEV S ATHWAL JAGDEV S ATHWAL Lot: 3, D.L.: 399, Plan: 85401-ot: 4, D.L.: 399, Plan: 8540 Urban Residential and Conservation RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Multi -Family Residential RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential), RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential), CD-1-00 (Comprehensive Development) Urban Residential and Conservation Multi -Family Residential RM-3 (High Density Apartment Residential), RM-2 (Medium Density,Apartment Residential) Urban Residential Multi -Family Residential and Senior Residents CD-5-94 (Comprehensive Development), LUC, 1105 Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Previous Applications: b) Project Description: Urban Residential Single Family Residential RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Urban Residential and Conservation Vacant 0.512 ha (1.265 ac.) 224th Street Full Urban The applicant, Jagdev S. Athwal, on February 6=h, 2008 was found guilty in the Supreme Court of British Columbia of cutting and removing of trees and vegetation and altering the grade of the lands along Morse Creek without the benefit of first obtaining the required Development Permit contrary to Section 920 (1)(d) of the Local Government Act. As a result he was ordered by the Court through a mandatory injunction to obtain a DP to stabilize and restore the lands within the DP area and Morse Creek to their condition prior to the breach of the Act and Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection Bylaw No. 6410-2006. The Court also found the applicant guilty of the following: 1. Caused or permitted prohibited material and water containing prohibited material to be released directly or indirectly into Morse Creek; 2. Obstructed or impeded the flow of Morse Creek; This ruling is important should Provincial or Federal authorities decide to proceed with their own action against the applicant. A mandatory injunction was obtained by the District against the applicant to ensure that any work completed by the applicant proceed under the supervision of registered professionals (a geotechnicai engineer and an environmental consultant). The work will consist of the planting of trees, vegetation and stabilizing the bank along Morse Creek in accordance with the measures and parameters identified in the expert reports prepared by Golder and Associates Ltd. and Letts Envirowise Ltd. The work is outlined in the following reports and will make up the contents of the Development Permit: 1. Riparian Planting Plan; 2. Sediment and Erosion Control Plan; and 3. Slope Restoration Plan. c) Planning Analysis: Watercourse Protection Development Permit: The Watercourse Protection Development Permit Area was established for the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. It was this bylaw, -2- along with section 920 (1)(d) of the Local Government Act that the applicant was found to be in breach of by the Supreme Court. The guidelines of the bylaw are as follows: A. Watercourse Protection Area Establishment: 1. Watercourse protection areas are to be established in accordance with their habitat value and the potential impacts proposed by adjacent development. The District of Maple Ridge, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks must endorse the proposed watercourse protection boundaries. . The District has for many years identified Morse Creek as a watercourse worthy of protection by way of covenant in the past but by dedication recently. Letts Evirowise Ltd. has identified the appropriate 15 metre setback from the original unaltered tap -of -bank.. Notification has been made by Letts Envirowise on behalf of the applicant to both the Ministry of Environment and DFO of the required restoration works. 2. The watercourse protection areas are to be dedicated where possible into public ownership for conservation purposes. Future rezoning and development of this site will result in the' transfer of the restored watercourse protection area into the ownership of the DMR. 3. The boundaries of the watercourse protection areas are to be physically located on the ground by a B.C. Land Surveyor prior to site disturbance. A B.C. Land Surveyor has now located the precise location of the top -of -bank and edge of fill for use with this DP application and any future development of this site. 4. Temporary barrier fencing is to be installed adjacent to watercourse protection areas prior to any construction activity and should be replaced with permanent post and rail fence upon development completion. The environmental monitor and geotechnical consultant will oversee the proposed works of the Riparian Planting, Sediment and Erosion Control and Slope Restoration Plans throughout the restoration process. 5. All lots must provide the required minimum lot dimensions as set out in the Zoning Bylaw exclusive of the watercourse protection boundaries. No alterations to the legal boundaries of the two lots in question will occur at this time. This will occur at the development stage of any future project. B. Erosion Control: 6. All work is to be undertaken and completed in such a manner as to prevent the release of sediment to any ravine, watercourse or storm sewer. An erosion and sediment control plan that involves implementation prior to land clearing and site preparation and the careful timing of construction is to be provided in accordance with the requirements of the District's Watercourse Protection Bylaw 6410-2006. -3- A detailed Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been prepared by Letts Envirowise Ltd. The plan calls for sediment control facilities to remain in place until the project is complete. The contractor and environmental consultant shall monitor the protective works which consist of., a temporary gravel access road; on site drainage rock pit, perimeter siltation fencing, and construction drainage swales; all exposed soils shall be protected with poly or straw. 7. Silt fencing should be erected to prevent the movement of silt into the watercourse protection area prior to any disturbance to the soil on the site. The ESC plan requires that silt fencing be installed prior to any restoration works proceeding and in accordance with the plans provided. S. Cutting and filling adjacent to watercourse protection areas is to be kept to a minimum incorporating appropriate structural fill material and blending graded areas with natural slope, as supported by the Hillside Policies of the OCP. Extensive filling has already occurred on this portion of Morse Creek and the works outlined in the Slope Restoration Plan will restore the area to a stabile profile of2.5 H:1V or flatter. 9. The District may require environmental impact studies enhancement works, and monitoring in support of development proposed to be located within a Watercourse Protection Area. Supporting documentation, technical studies, and recommendations with respect to impacts of studies, and recommendations with respect to impacts of the proposed development may include the following: a. A Geotechnical Slope Stability Report; b. Riparian Planting Report; and c. Sediment and Erosion Control Plan. C. Vegetation Management 10. Natural vegetation is to be retained wherever possible to ensure minimal disruption to the environment and to protect against slope failure. Land clearing adjacent to the watercourse protection areas is to be restricted to a phased construction schedule. The vast majority of natural vegetation was eliminated by the illegal filling that occurred on the east bank of Morse Creek. Once a stable slope is re-established, a total riparian planting area of 2,114 sq. m (22,730 sq ft) will be created and replanted with 1,628 native trees and scrubs. 11. Habitat restoration landscaping of all bare or sparse riparian areas within the watercourse protection area may be required. Vegetation species should be native of the area and be selected for erosion control and fish and wildlife habitat values. The Riparian Rehabilitation Plan consists of native trees and scrubs and consists of- Bigleaf Maples, Eastern red Cedars, Dogwoods, Douglas Fit, Red Alder, Vine Maple Beacked Hazelnut and Mountain Ash. Shrubs are various berry producing species, ferns and willows started from cuttings. -4- 12. Stormwater outflows to the stream or leave area should have water quality and erosion control features so as to minimize their impacts on fish habitat and in compliance with the Districts stormwater management plans. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan will deal with these items. D. Monitorin . 13. The implementation of required environmental mitigative measures as designed and their maintenance is to be monitored by a qualified environmental monitor. Although the applicant is free to choose a contractor of his choice to perform the work, performance is a real concern. As such, the Court granted a mandatory injunction requiring the applicant to stabilize and restore the lands within the Development Permit area and Morse Creek in accordance with the riparian planting plan and slope stabilization plan and sediment control plan prepared by the geotechnical and environmental consultants. The applicant has already sought to make cost reduction efforts to these original studies and has been informed this was not possible. The Court further ordered that the applicant must perform and complete all the works set out in the Restoration Plans by June 15th, 2008 and obtain from the Registered Professionals certification that all the works set out in the various plans are completed to their satisfaction, no later than June 30, 2008. To further ensure that this matter is dealt with in an efficient manner, the Superior Court judge has reserved any further action that may be necessary will be dealt with by him. This would significantly reduce any delays of any future court action on the part of the District to seek enforcement of the Supreme Court Order. d) Intergovernmental Issues: Department of Fisheries and Oceans DFO has been informed of the District's efforts to resolve this issue and has also issued their own Orders to the applicant to restore the watercourse. Their representative has also attended the court proceedings and has reported back to his superiors. e) Financial Implications: Performance Security: 1_ In support of the restoration works required in or around Morse Creek the amount of security that will be required is $ 36,720.00. 2. Performance security for site development will be achieved through provisions of the Watercourse Protection Bylaw. -5- CONCLUSION: The issuance of this Development Permit, with assistance from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, will rectify and restore an important watercourse in the District. To this end a restoration strategy has been prepared by registered professionals. The Development Permit is the proper mechanism to implement the suggested works. Therefore, it is recommended that Watercourse Development Permit 023/08 be approved for issuance. Should the applicant not live up to his obligations as outlined in the Supreme Court Order, the District will proceed back to Court and seek a Contempt of Court charge. The Court could then decide to impose fines or authorize the District to' proceed with the works as outlined and charge the costs back onto the applicant's property taxes. Prepared by: Charles R. GKddard, BA, MA Manager of Development and Environmental Services , MCIP Grly, Approved by: / Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng f GM: Public Works 8y e— lopment Services Concurrence: L. (Jim) RGIe Chief Administrative Officer crg/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A: Subject Map Appendix B: Rehabilitation, Riparian Planting, Stream Restoration Plan Appendix C: Sediment and Erosion Control Plan Appendix D: Geotechnical Slope Restoration Plan Appendix E: Supreme Court Order iEZ r 30 12333 r f4UUU dP�r�a7 w 12334 8 Rem 1 42 20 i 12325 t 9 LMP 4403 P 80319 43 A 12305 P 75480 10 NWS 3018 18 NWS 2777 LMS 608 Park 1 11 BCP 30288 BCP 30288 12296 44 12283 F 12 N PP119 2 122a8 m 13 ° 1 Rem A BCS 2665 ea BCP 15645 14 LMP 50617 12275 i8 12258 P 13 42 1 241 13 A B 53 BCP 21579 BCP 29961 LOT A B P 51690 12241 LMS 1802 a 12238112248 LMS 3 21 12107 N LMS 873 A, 2208 P 86603 12191 H A LMP 26249 Rem. 326 iv P 16132 3 H I P 52376 12184-90 44 48 12107 Rem 3 _ 41066 P 44211 2 12170 12175 m ' Subject Propertiesa 12159 M 0- �— LT�rir-i3240 12164 P 8496 4 LMS 4011 1 L Parcel "A" 3 12149 12148 (ECRA) P 4 14 12 28 12142 P 15022 1 12150 12131 Rem a LMP 39518(1ea e) G I 'M 23 12151 10669 15 12130 r 121W 29 NWS 1688 E 1/2 1' �12127 12130 P 787 IL 16 10 12128 E 12124 12 21 N 12127 P 61324 12it7 12121 p P $7E n 17 9 12107 1 104 0 6 7 702 2 0 N N 12118 N 13 20 1 12007 121 AVE_ 18 N 8 a 12093 F 12092 tz09a 14 z 9 12101 0 ❑ H ry ° 7 t208a a 12082 U5 3 A A 17 19 120a7 N lzoaa 15 8 a LMP 34533 p B71 LMP 27701 12072 LMP 44378 BROWN AVE. Ram 7 12080 P 12081 129ea as 79 District of Pitt Meadows , /S f -- Sill vvalley ; 12157/12175-224 St o _orsec j , CORPORATION OF LLL Hy � I U i a THE DISTRICT OF N ,' . • MAPLE RIDGE i Albion. i District of � I I PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley f7�� I o SCALE 1:2,000 � � s L i DATE: Apr 8, 2008 DP/023/08 BY: PC ti w g$ I 0. I ff ff. H H j 4 14 4 4�SS E Al 0GO`«C0 O 5 U. O �jje pEsp S lQ � O x bz b _p n �IBM ILU U)nnti E n� O U y y $ �044 �'e l: �^ Y4• �. 1. 'r •i•�•® et�b••t/��Y«`1//••-••. 'mil ��� �_..e�'�E•-ram...,;. /�� .-••"i!. : @/ e$V• s r•,� 6•. r!►'. •fir •S'sr ♦•r iw q ' i!•:!• • @...@ @�• _ sir",". �&$� :�� *'�a `� ° e �' . _ •9�t�: lb RK'd.t 9`.�!� �: t y �a� 9.�•4i: ylowe +r:G�„�«•a�s�3,0 •)14O ��@'..�'Ma.��•+..ate}s+• a� i p..�• @ od i�'b'��� ` �i�' "F`p`r @�� ark � �•••'�W*.P,,r�a• �t��• all Ica& s :S. m°r•. em�s• �a '`'.°��': e`er' ':.. ••- �*�.=••.. .2.•r;�., �._:�_'��,• r �;: opt_-• z w o'jI m 7 � � ' 0 Q) n Eft E E ct bf i� 8Y lit mr.�i `\\\\\� 9���lr�7Qo �K� own nq � •:!S!r r 4'� Oi *f' p+�.. _ � of ai 4�R• r!r 6 :- A� i. r •- Pyri `��r•�O • !{]:•%y�PlilPi ■ �d�4!>!. ggqr.�•A• pS*8 �Pe!•' ♦ is+rd .•�' � � J+ re� R+�i4 6�' i�'`.%� Y � p:SP P�.cr �" ��•r��P -ar 9r.-� t�at� �� ►�G q�•�•' eYyt� e �. *G r>�f • 9-' iPr6r i air •rs q• •• • � _.y,r•l�iir, •. �'�;'yj 's•��� �.• r/• r)( s°•. a �Lar'�4 • Qi�)rsr • rib •J•��•4 f . Ls •).-rad •.�Rard� °'r �• :A � Cr'rP �vr�vii �Y •�A vr'��h•-'. j)�r0 1 VR r �r � qv�0 P*-w •' eGrr,L.y •L[P�d�!�{rr/hF`.S_,'• O�1�a rvF' r.r L�" T•� 9!b1� c r �• S7 Sr°' ratii'�+• •� • { at•': ►�ir��•' J • YRk1 J-V O• •JY" �r•-i�r�� Or> ell it Qi, �lt� •rr'*.�".`L•Ps r.•s..ru�•`rb r S7i»>w�P,.r• M�rr • ..J• qA•"' ♦°4 t! •A i t� • ��•�I�,a„*y'r r•- 1�1� 4 �1y .q qs •aaa � �1�11�ca��Y!`� Cr ��yN�.�• � rL1A• J �IA 6r r. d`'•• • p c r'r•� •T� �S� d w_4b~ice`= • •��as diPr ` !"`s5e.�i' ��cc��-s+.� •i+� '�� �r•r s �w*i,� •llA1�� ;�b•' P•iCS"�feC4. �Ilggrfik qw-�Py�l� deg • - • •i r. icl•A•�:�o�v� �:�'•r+� P� �>��� gam}l�i��� sr.�r � �f e- it « ri gM`:l�r•;�r �' � ��� °'r�•�Pp..ai��r' E�by� rr•`� �Myyst� • g4 0 �..s f gtrcgr• 5 i� •yo •r •.~vile) =` AwP rr-o�•IJQA AIM a •:•�%*Mqw► P.. ijcr v w •.- .•'pog • • •• A e Eby, rr is �I-) _ d•r�7!6 r•ym+asa, �gb_tr�� �� fro ,•�.• �sy`.r .� .� •� �•a e r • • i ®ir r4s 1rirr ~ts.rs.'�gs�r•is�rmC�tit`�r /_RiF�b��.{•bi cr,;' w7 9 r�i/►`. - Jr i P Y•!� ��'-�:^.. �• A yr fa�•��#i�+•".1.`e«t►s rl4Pmii.O• C®?:Oi i•���Cwi A.d C�4O L" lr�r r.•! �p.ily«O r Li) ji, � i r&6r iYg'P rr i.q' �.•Yr•i� 3 Sonoma ,,�)WZzx 7P ` TNURHER ENGINEERING UT0. yEliF•1S MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Jagdev Athwal Date: March 10, 2008 From: Dave Smith/ David Regehr/ Gurpreet Bala File: 19-5305-0 121157 AND 12175 - 224 STREET, MAPLE RIDGE, B.C. GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SLOPE RESTORATION As requested, Thurber Engineering Ltd_ (TEL) has carried out a geotechnical. investigation for the remediation of the Morse Creek slope at 12157 and 12175 224 Street, Maple Ridge. This report presents the results of our site visit and geotechnical investigation and provides our recommendations. Use of this report is subject to the enclosed Statement of General Conditions. 1. INTRODUCTION TEL was retained by Mr. Jagdev Athwal (owner of the subject properties) to provide geotechnical recommendations for the restoration of the Morse Creek slope along the west side of his property in Maple Ridge. Authorization to proceed with the investigation was given by Ms. Aiyssa Bradley, of Lidstone, Young, Anderson of Vancouver on behalf of the District of Maple Ridge on March 4, 2008 via email. 2. BACKGROUND Based on the review of the available information and discussions with Mr. Jagdev Athwal, we understand that, in summer 2006, regrading of the property was carried out using earthmoving equipment (no specific reference was obtained about the type of the machine used)_ The clayey soil excavated from the site, together, with some borrowed soil from offsite, was pushed onto the east slope of the Morse Creek which runs in a north - south direction. This fill contained organics (as observed on the site) and was placed without proper compaction. The fill pushed back the limits of the existing crest of the bank towards the west by several metres and interfered with the normal flow of Morse Creek. This resulted in a change of the flow patterns and silting of the water in the Creek. Date: March 10, 2008 Pans- i of F TI- URBER ENG IINEE141NG LTD. YEAiiS We understand that the District accused Mr. Athwal of damaging the watercourse in a Development Permit Area. The damage was caused by the dumping of dirt into Morse Creek which flows adjacent to his properties on 224 Street. In the ruling by the Supreme Court on February 6, 2008, Honourable Justice Truscott ruled that Mr. Athwal had altered his lands at 12175 and 12157 — 224 Street by altering the grades. These portions of the lands are covered by the District's Official Community Plan Bylaw 5434. No Development Permits were obtained by Mr. Athwal. Furthermore, Mr. Athwal was found to have violated Section 3 of the District's Watercourse Protection Bylaws 5807 (1999) and 6410 (2006) by releasing prohibited rnaterial into Morse Creek. He also violated Section 4 of 'Bylaws 5807 and 6410 due to the obstruction that resulted from the dumping of the materials into the creek. A Court Order was issued requiring Mr. Athwai to stabilize and restore his lands within the Development Permit Area and Morse Creek to their condition prior to the breach and to complete all of the work by June 15, 2008_ On behalf of the District, Lidstone, Young, Anderson retained Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder) and Letts Envirowise Ltd. (LETTS) to review the condition of the existing slope and the condition of the creek and to obtain recommendations for the restoration of the slope. Reports by these companies were submitted in December 2006 and July 2007, respectively_ The Court Order -required that Mr. Athwal retain Golder to complete the required slope stabilization plan. However, Golder declined this arrangement and TEL was retained by Mr. Athwal and approved by the District to complete the work. 3. FEBRUARY 26, 2008 SITE VISIT P. site visit was carried ^ut by i'�1r_ Gurpreet Bala of TEL on February 26J, 2008 and the following observations made: Overall the site was relatively flat with few zones of depression in which water ponded (Photo 1). The vegetation on the site primarily comprised of grass, weeds and some bushes. Though not of any significance, some vehicle ruts were also observed. Client: Mr. lagdev Athwai Date: March 10, 2008 File No: 19-5305-0 Page 2 of 5 E File: memo7gsh-12157 224 st slope remdiatioion_revo 40 THUROER ENGINEERING LTD. 41iYPJW Morse Creek flows on the west side of the site and flows northwards. Along one cross-section approximately through the centreline of the property, the top of the Morse Creek was about 5.8 m lower than the top of the bank elevation/ the general lot elevation. The slope above Morse Creek comprised loosely placed clayey fill with some organics. Discussions with Mr. Athwal indicated that, this fill was primarily pushed from the slope edge while grading the site. The surface texture of the slope had lumps of dumped soil. Grass had grown over most of the slope. • The crest of the original slope could not be established in the field. The existing slope of the Creek contained two separate zones of slumps measuring about 9 m and 4 m in width (Photos 2 and 3). Two shallow erosion gullies were also present on the slope close to the centre and the north end of the slope (Photos 2 and 4). These gullies would have probably formed due to the surface runoff from the lot towards the Creek. However, no water was observed to be flowing during the site visit. The existing slope was measured at 1.75H:1V to 2HAV at two sections. At two locations, the pushed fill material was observed to be resting against the trees on the slope of the creek. A few tilted and fallen trees were also observed towards the north end of the slope (Photo 2). The remainder of the slope, 2 years after construction, appeared to be stable. = No signs of the dumped soil being eroded by the Creek flow were observed_ 4. GEOTECRIdINCA r RA.aCOS.79— .C3JiAl_. Based on the history of construction, of the Creek slope and site observations, it is inferred that the slope is marginally stable and will likely deteriorate progressively with time in future due to the ingress of moisture and associated slope movements. The shallow slumps observed would likely retrogress towards the crest of the slope, leading to more slumps. Client: Mr. Jagdev Athwal Date- March 10, 2008 File No: 19-5305-0 Page 3 of 5 E File: memo-gsb-12157 224 st siope remdiatioioa_rev0 THUREEFI ENGINEERING LTD. YEAMS The erosion gullies would most likely form into permanent drainage channels until the site is regraded so that the surface water flows away from the slope during heavy rainfall events. These gullies would be the main source of further erosion and silting of the Creek. Unless controlled, the gullies would widen and trigger slumping of the dumped mass on the creek slope. No data regarding water levels and flows in the Creek during different periods of the year was available for review. Thus, no comment can be made on erosion of the dumped mass along the slope by the flow in the Creek. In our opinion, all of the loosely place uncompacted fill should be removed from the slope. The slope being steep, unstable and relatively high (6 m to S m), removal of the fill should be carried out with caution. The vegetation cover that was removed or was damaged due to fill placement should be restored as the vegetation will increase the stability of the slope. As discussed in the earlier sections, the present slope is considered to be unstable and subject to erosion. The Court Order requires stabilization and restoration of the lands within the Development Permit Area and Morse Creek. We recommended that all of the till material within the fill removal limits shown on Dwg. 19-5305-0-1 to be removed_ As the slope is deemed unstable and comprises loosely placed fill, the excavation/ removal of the fill shall be carried out in stages and in the form of benches. A 2 tier bench excavation is considered suitable although the procedures shall be refined in the field as removal proceeds. The procedure should be approved by TEL personal present on the site during the operation. All loose fill should be removed to the limits of the pre -disturbed location of the slope face. The final attained slope should be flatter than 2_5► .-1 y and any additional fill required to build the slope face should granular soil. The fill should be placed and compacted to attain at least 95% of Standard Proctor Maximum Dry Density, as determined in the laboratory. Quality control on the compacted density should be maintained by field density tests using a nuclear densometer. Client: Mr. Jagdev Athwal [late: March 10, 2008 File No: 19-5305-0 Page 4 of 5 E File: . memo-gsG-121 57 224 st slope remdiatioion_rev0 �` f THIJRBER ENC�INEERINC3 LTG. v s We understand that a riparian plan regarding vegetation, topsoil placement, installation of erosion control matting on the slope, construction of swales and dissipation of the surface runoff will be provided by LETTS. We trust that this memorandum is sufficient for your needs. Should you require clarification of any item or additional information, please contact us at your convenience. n y�W28 1 � $ 11 E ll �VcZ��t� 1 atN�1, a a�sy»u�11 Client: Mr. Jagdev Athwal Date: March 10, 2008 File No: 19-5305-0 Page 5 of 5 E File: memo-gsb-12157 224 st slope remdiatioion_rev0 BETWEEN: AND: FORM 43, RULE 41(9) NO. S103318 NEW WESTMINSTER REGISTRY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE JAGDEV SINGH ATHWAL ORDER PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT } } ) BEFORE } THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE } WEDNESDAY, THE 6th TRUSCOTT } DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2008 THE APPLICATION of the Plaintiff corning on for hearing at New Westminster, British Columbia, on February 5 and 6, 2008, and on hearing Alyssa Bradley and Francesca Marzari, counsel for the Plaintiff, and R. Keith Oliver, counsel for the Defendant: THIS COURT ORDERS: I . A declaration that the Defendant has altered the lands legally described as: Parcel Identifier: 011-337-508 Lot 4 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 8540 Parcel Identifier: 007-613-741 Lot 3 Except: The North 5 Feet; District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 8540 (the "Lands") by cutting and removing trees and vegetation and altering the grade of the Lands within that portion of the Lands designated by the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 5434, 1996 as Development Permit Area — XXX Watercourses .Designated for Special Treatment (the "Development Permit Area') without first having obtained a development permit authorizing such alterations of the Lands, contrary to s. 920(1)(d) of the Local Government Act; 2. A declaration that the Defendant has caused or permitted prohibited material and water containing prohibited material to be released directly or indirectly into the watercourse on and/or adjacent to the Lands known in the District as Morse Creek ("Morse Creek"), contrary to s. 3 of Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection Bylaw No. 5807, 1999 (`Bylaw No. 5807"); 3. A declaration that the Defendant has caused or permitted prohibited material and water containing prohibited materials to be released into Morse Creek, contrary to s. 3 of Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection Bylaw No. 6410, 2006 (`Bylaw No. 6410"); 4. A declaration that the Defendant has obstructed or impeded the flow of Morse Creek, contrary to s. 4 of Bylaw No. 5807; 5. A declaration that the Defendant has obstructed or impeded the flow of Morse Creek, contrary to s. 4 of Bylaw No. 6410; 6. A permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from altering the Lands by cutting or removing trees and vegetation and altering the grade of the Lands within the Development Permit Area, without first obtaining a development permit authorizing such alterations; 7. A permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from causing or permitting the release of prohibited material into Morse Creek; A permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from obstructing or impeding the flow of Morse Creek; 9. A mandatory injunction requiring the Defendant to stabilize and restore the Lands within the Development Permit Area and Morse Creek to their condition prior to the Defendant's breach of s. 920(1)(d) of the Local Government Act and ss. 3 and 4 of Bylaw No. 5805 and Bylaw No. 6410 by: (a) Retaining Golder Associates Ltd. and Letts Envirowise Ltd. (the "Registered Professionals") to prepare and provide a riparian planting plan, a slope stabilization plan and a sediment control plan by March 15, 2008, detailing the remedial work required to restore the Lands to their previous condition prior to the breach of s. 920(1)(d) of the Local Government Act and ss. 3 and 4 of Bylaw No. 5805 and Bylaw No. 6410 through the planting of trees, vegetation and other means and stabilizing the bank along Morse Creek in accordance with the measures and parameters identified in the expert reports prepared by the Registered Professionals dated December 1, 2006, and July 20, 2007, or as otherwise directed by the Registered Professionals (the "Restoration Plans"); (b) Performing and completing all the works set out in the Restoration Plans by June 15, 2008; and (c) Obtaining certification from the Registered Professionals that all the works set out in the Restoration Plans are completed to their satisfaction, no later than June 30, 2008; 10. Both parties shall have liberty to apply to this Court to alter the dates for compliance in this Order; 11. Truscott J. is seized of any applications with respect to amendments to the dates for compliance with this Order, or applications for enforcement of this Order; and 12. The Defendant shall pay costs to the Plaintiff at Scale B. BY THE COURT REGISTRAR Approved as to form: Alyssa Bradley Counsel for the Plaintiff Approved as to form: R. Keith Oliver Counsel for the Defendant MAPILE- RIDGE British Columbia Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SU BJ ECT District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: April 7, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W 11th Annual Vistas Run EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request has been received from the Vistas Run organizer to use municipal streets for the 11th Annual Vistas Run on Sunday, May 25, 2008 between 7:00 am and 1:00 pm. A copy of the request is attached. Authorization from Council is required in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By- law 3136-1982" to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge. RECOMMENDATION: THAT the use of municipal streets be authorized for the 11th Annual Vistas Run on Sunday May 25, 2008, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule 'A' attached to the staff report dated April 7, 2008 are met. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability for injury or damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as "Schedule A". The race is scheduled to begin at 9:00 AM and anticipated to end at approximately 10:30 am. However, volunteers will be arriving at 7:00 am and leaving at approximately 1:00 pm. The run route will start at Webster's Corner Elementary School and proceed south on 256 Street, west on 112 Avenue to the Kanaka Regional Park entrance. The 5-km runners will do a single loop through the park, and then back up 256 Street to the school. The 10-km runners continue through Kanaka Creek Regional Park, exiting the park on 251 Street at Cliff Park, proceed north on 251 Street, east on 117 Avenue, north on 252 Street. They will travel west on Dewdney Trunk Road to 250 Street, south to 119 Avenue, and continue south on 248 Street to Ferguson Avenue, re-entering the park before returning to the school via 256 Street. A map of the route is outlined in Form 'A'. 1106 b) Strategic Alignment: Administrating Maple Ridge street events allows the District to manage road infrastructure and associated risks but . yet allows events that promote community development, commemorate and celebrate community accomplishments and highlight Maple Ridge's natural and built features. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Permission to use municipal streets may cause some minor delays and inconveniences to other road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the Vistas Run volunteers. d) Governmental implications: The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service). e) Business Plan/Financial implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. f) Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices. g) Alternatives: The District could refuse to permit the event to occur at this location. In this event, the organizer may have to cancel the event. However, this event has a history in this community. CONCLUSIONS: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events and activities. The Vistas Run for the Ridge Meadows Hospice Society event has been held in Maple Ridge for several years. The organizers have requested permission to hold the event on municipal streets for 2008. Submitted by: An rew oo hD. Pl=ng. Muni ngi y Approved by: rank Quinn, MBA, DEng. GM: _Public Works &A vel meat Services Concurrence: J. L. i'm) Rule Chi Administrative Officer ML/rni Schedule 'A' To Council Memorandum Dated April 7 2008 11th Annual Vistas Run for the Ridge Meadows Hospice Society Conditions of Approval Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers: 1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the R.C.M.P., and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District); 2. notify local Fire Department and Ambulance Services of the event; 3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; 4. advertise the event and give notice of the road closure in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses of the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date); 5. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any way connected with the event; 6. obtain the required permission from the School District to use their facilities; 7. obtain the required permits from Parks & Leisure Services and the Regional Parks for use of their facilities; 8. must maintain access for emergency services to the closure area at all times. 9. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District." Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; and 10.refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the District. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw this permission to use municipal streets should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements. Chief Administrative Officer 1 - 1 6-08 i L : U6F'M ; 171 u�, �c' 11C�u V W� I.Iu�N 1 V C V V TYU.-+V JJJ Vistas Run 5 km Walk/Run -- 10 km Run In Support of the Ridge Meadows Hospice Society January 14, 2008 Municipality of Maple Ridge Engineering Department Attention: Terry Fryer Re: 11t' Annual Vistas Run Planning is now under way for the 11t' Annual Vistas Run, and I am hereby applying for permission to hold it again in east Maple Ridge. Date and Time: Sunday, May 25, 2008, Race start time: 9.00am Distance: 5km and 10km Participation: 400 Route: Beginning on 256th Street, on the south side of Dewdney Trunk, proceeding south to 112 Avenue Diversion, where it heads west to the entrance to Kanaka Creek Regional Park. The 5 km route then heads east back through the park, then north on 256th back to the starting point. The 10 km route will run through the park, exiting at 251stm then head north to Dewdney. Runners will run west along the south side of Dewdney, turning south at 250th. From there they will turn west on 11 a Avenue, south on 248th, through the gully, and east on Ferguson where they will re-enter Kanaka Regional Park. They then run east through the park, turning north on 256th, back to the starting point. Runners will be on the course from approximately 9:00 am till 10:30 am. Prior to the race the volunteers will begin arriving by 7:00am. The last volunteers should be leaving the school between noon and 1:00pm. Parking: Webster's Corner School has 32 marked stalls. On the wide shoulder in front of the school there is room for approximately 20 vehicles, plus dozens more along 256th Street. There is a large grass lot on the southeast corner at 256th and Dewdney that the owner, Mr. Robson, allows us to use. We have not had any problems with parking in the past and see no problems forthcoming. safety: Teams of route marshals will be on route, St. Johns Ambulance will be in attendance and all participants are insured by BC Amateur Athletics. The Vistas Run has gone smoothly in previous years and last year raised over $30.000 for the Ridge Meadows Hospice Society. We are applying for RCMP approval, GVRD, School District 42 and Parks Board permits as well. Thank you_ If you require more information, please call the Hospice Office at: 604-463-7722 5incc�ely,� Cherrille, per Robert Masse, Race Director Jnn 1S 08 03:19p Ridge Meadows Hospice 6044656353 P.2 Vistas Run 5 km WalkJRun -- 10 km Run In Support of the Ridge Meadows Hospice Society January 14, 2008 Ambulance Services Maple Ridge, BC Fax: 604-467-7329 To Whom it May Concern; The eleventh annual Vistas Run will take place on Sunday, May 25, 200$, in the Webster's Corner area. The route is the same as in previous years: Beginning on 2561h Street, on the south side of Dewdney Trunk, proceeding south to 112 Avenue Diversion, where it heads west heads east back through the pakk, Creek Regional Park. The 5 km route then hew then north on 256tn back to the starting point. The 10 km route will curt through the park, exiting sla� �f Qe dreiey, tum north s uth Dewdney. Runners will run west along the south at 250t". From there they will turn west on 119' Avenue, enter K naka Regional Park.h the gully, and east on Ferguson where they will re They then run east through the park, turning north on 256th, back to the starting point. Runners will be on the course from approximately 9:00 am till 10:30 am, with refreshments and awards following in e expecting xyt250 {350 runners and walkerer's Corners s School, at 256t and Dewdney. We are the east to take part in the event. Parking will be in the school parking lot, along side of 2560 and along the south side of Dewdney. Our routes were chosen to avoid traffic areas s$volunteers will be pastedh as possible, and ize disruption to neighborhoods. To ensure aafe race along the routes to direct the runners and ensure traffic proceeds cautiously. St. John Ambulance will be in attendance as well. if you require more information, please call the Hospice Office at: 604-463-7722 S' rel , Robert Masse, Race Director FORM `A' Details of the Event Date:. J" Contact Person:ZQb— WQJ Phone4oq-14 Details: T`Y0Q-PJJQU/i--L, Alk-0 ' W Sketch of Traffic Control P[an: NF--W An e- �4 /got 8 'R FF fy RCMP concurrence for the proposed Traffic Control Plan (5 �41,-, &.4 Q The following agencies have been advised and acknowledge the event.-' BC Transit Fire Department V/ Ambulance Services Other 604 737 3076 02:51:55 p.m. 03-19-2008 1 I1 SPORTINSURANCE M GVRD, Surry Q467 7425 ARKETING LTD. Dist. M.R. Ter Fryer SD 42, Debra Holz 463-7862 Robert Masse 467-4598 BC Athletics (101) CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE AS HEREIN DESCRIBED HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED BELOW AND ARE IN FORCE AT THE DATE HEREOF; THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF; NAME OF INSURED GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT BC ATHLETICS ASSOCIATION CORP. OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, CITY OF PITT (RIDGE MEADOWS HOSPICE SOCIETY) MEADOWS, RIDGE MEADOWS PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES COMMISSION, SCHOOL DISTRICT 42 ABOVE ARE ADDED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED, BUT SOLELY WITH RESPECT TO THE LIABILITY WHICH ARISES OUT OF LOCATION AND OPERATIONS THE ACTIVITIES OF THE NAMED INSURED TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE APPLIES GVRD / MAPLE RIDGE, BC "VISTAS RUN/WALK" MAY 25, 2008 TO WHOM NOTICE WILL BE MAILED IF SUCH INSURANCE IS CANCELLED OR ]$.CHANGED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AFFECT THIS CERTIFICATE KIND OF POLICY POLICY NO. I INSURERS LIMIT OF LIABILITY GENERAL LIABILITY AS1064 AVIVA INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA $5.000,000.00 Inclusive limit 'DEDUCTIBLE $500.00 POLICY EXTENSIONS CROSS LIABILITY CLAUSE INCLUDED `PARTICIPANT COVERAGE INCLUDED 'SUBJECT TO 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE OF CANCELLATION THE INSURANCE AFFORDED IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF THE APPLICABLE POLICY. ALL SPORT INSURANCE MARKETING LTD. Marcie 19, 2008 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Ins? 507, 1367 West Broadway, Vancouver, BC V6H 4A9 TEL (604) 737-3018 FAX (604) 737-3076 A MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: April 21, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W 5th Annual Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation Fund Run EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request has been received from the Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation to use municipal streets for the 5th Annual Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation Fund Run on Sunday, June 1, 2008 from 9:00 AM to 12:00 PM. Setup on site will start at 6:00 AM. A copy of the request is attached. Authorization from Council is required in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By- law 3136-1982" to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge RECOMMENDATION: THAT the use of municipal streets be authorized for the 5th Annual Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation Fund Run on Sunday June 1, 2008, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule 'A' attached to the staff report dated April 21, 2008 are met. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually given on condition that the District be indemnified against any liability for injury or damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as "Schedule A". There are two courses: a 5 kilometer and a 10 kilometer. Both courses start and conclude at Fairview Elementary School located at 12209 206 Street. 5 kilometer course: Participants travel south on 206 Street to Dewdney Trunk Road (DTR) and travel west on the north side of DTR to 203 Street (the event coordinator will have marshals along DTR to ensure participants stay on the sidewalk & curb). They will travel north on 203 Street to 123 Avenue and travel east on 123 Avenue to Laity Street. They will travel south on Laity Street to Wicklund Avenue where they will do a quick turnaround and continue south on Laity Street to DTR and travel west on DTR to 206 Street and continue north to Fairview Elementary where the run will conclude. 1107 10 kilometer course: Participants travel south on 206 Street to DTR and travel west on the north side of DTR to 203 Street (the event coordinator will have marshals along DTR to ensure participants stay on the sidewalk & curb). Participants will travel north on 203 Street to 132 Avenue where marshals will be positioned to ensure participants travel east on 132 Avenue on the north side of the street. They will travel north on Neaves Road and will be assisted by marshals in crossing 132 Avenue and Neaves Road. Participants will travel on the east side of Neaves Road heading north towards the dykes and travel east on the dykes to Laity Street and 128 Avenue. Participants will continue south on Laity Street towards DTR and continue westbound on DTR traveling on the north side of the roadway to 206 Street, and continue north to Fairview Elementary where the run will conclude. Preparation for this event will begin at 6:00 AM and the race will start promptly at 9:00 AM. The clean up and finish of the event will be complete by approximately 12:00 PM. b) Strategic Alignment: Permitting of Maple Ridge street events promotes community development and often highlights Maple Ridge's natural and built features. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Permission to use municipal streets may cause some delays and inconveniences to other road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the event organizers. d) Governmental implications: The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP, for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as Coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service) on any rerouting requirements. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. f) Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices. g) Alternatives: The District could refuse to permit the run to occur. In this event, the organizer would have to cancel the run. CONCLUSIONS: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events and activities. The Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation Fund Run is requesting permission to hold the 5tr Annual Ridge Meadows hospital Foundation Fund Run event on municipal streets for 2008. Submitted by "Oka lr6000od, PhD: Muni Approved by. /t'rank Quinn, MBA, PEng. ,general Manage ubl� Works & Development Services Concurrence: L. (Jim) Rde Chief Administrative Officer ML/mi Schedule 'A' To Council Memorandum Dated April 21, 2008 5th Annual Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation Fund Run Conditions of Approval Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers: 1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the R.C.M.P., and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District); 2. notify local Fire Department and Ambulance Services of the event; 3. obtain any required permits from the School District for school facility use; 4. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; 5. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses of the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date); 6. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any way connected with the event; 7. must maintain access for emergency services at all times; 8. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District." Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; and 9. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the District. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw this permission to use municipal streets should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements. Chief Administrative Officer RIDGE MEADOWS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SUYPORTING THE &EST IN HEATH April 15, 2008 Mr. Matthew Li Engineering Department Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Dear Mr, Li: On June 1, 2008 the Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation will be holding its 5th annual Fund Run. The Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation strives to enhance the quality of health care at Ridge Meadows Hospital and health services area of Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows by creating opportunities for giving. Please find enclosed our request for approval for the Fund Run. We ask that this request be considered at the next council workshop. Please find enclosed the traffic control proposal and a snap outline of the run route as well as approval from the RMCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at the Foundation office at 604-466-6925. Sincerely, Annika Polegaty Development Officer Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation Fund Run Conunittee 11666 Laity Street, Box 5000 Maple Ridge, 8C V2X 7G5 TEL 604.463,1822 FAx 604.463.1888 www.rmbroundation.com 017 CHARITAB1_E REGISTRATION # 11903 2035 RR0001 R/ti/-qo-trn9 uotIr PMOn HWH /L:Gi Gi-AV-2007 f (� RIDGE MEADOWS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION S [1PPORTENG rHE BEST IN HEALTH Details of the Route Sunday, June 1, 2008 Contact Person: Annika Polegato Ridge Meadows Hospital Foundation Phone: 604-466-6925 Fax: 604-463-1888 E-Mail : annika.polegato@fraserhealth.ca Details: 10K/5K. Run starts at Fairview Elementary School located at 12209 2W' Street Maple Ridge. Runners travel south on 206"' until DTR (Dewdney Trunk Road). Runners then travel west on DTR (staying on the North side). We will have Marshalls along DTR to ensure runners stay on the sidewalk and curb. Ruriners travel north on 203rd until 132nd. Marshalls will be positioned at 132"d to ensure runners travel East on 132"d on the north side of street. Runners travel north on Neaves Road. Marshalls will be positioned at 132nd and Neaves Road to assist crossing of the runners. Runners travel on the east side of Neaves Road heading northbound to dykes. A marshall will be positioned at the dyke to assist runners onto the dyke. Runners travel on the dykes to Laity & 128t' Marshalls will be at Lairy & DTR to guide runners south on Laity Street. Marshall will be at Laity Street & DTR to guide runners westbound on DTR on north side of sidewalk, We will have marshals again at the intersection of 203'd & DTR to guide runners northbound on 2061h back to Fairview School, Details: 5K Walk/Run. — 5K Route starts at Fairview Elementary School (same location as IOK run). Runners travel south on 206 until DTR. Runners then travel west on DTR (staying on the north side). Runners travel north on 203rd until 123id Avenue. 5K walk/runners travel east on 123rd Avenue. Runners then travel south on Laity keeping to the west side of Laity. Runners then do a quick turnaround at Wicklund (about 200 meters and back to Laity). Runners continue to travel south on Laity to DTR. Rurmers travel west on DTR, keeping to the north side of the road. Runners then travel north on 206d' back to the finish line at Fairview School. 11666 Laity Street, Box 5000 Maple Ridge, BC V2X 7G5 TEL 604.463.1822 FAX 604.463.1888 www,rmhfoundation.com a/a CHARITABLE REGISI KAI1QN #11903 2035 RR0001 P/A/-oAi7-+,no u0t2enun04 WWM RT:C;T C;T-adH-Rnn7. 2008-Apr-15 I - sam m 4 144 -w e .111- 231 Av ,[eo A C75 15:18 RMH Foundation 604-466-1978 7 KILCNV�TRE 1'Y1 L 32 Nil- vmate C/) Powell Ave -7, 55 12-5 Al � zfi 248 cc 124r%, Ve 124A. AvC 12 4 Ave A. 1238 Ave 122P Avea�a 123• Ave icrALTyner Avc 2 P-0 7 z f, _N� LU_Ay v 11 CODX Ave 9 Av�. AHUML-cr Ave P) WORN, 65- Paimmomp Ave 1.28 Ave' Legend 10K 5 K Water Station 0 Volunteer Tilon-iloin P� 1-1homtor Vp 120�0f,� So Qn, u tg i a Avec,to 3 ph-ccallum 2`1 12� .1223 Avil, its;I.Pirms" P�c a: 112 2 Av e Q;122 Ave ain D p��Cnp Vief! Ave L AV'Z5 1 11 1 Av e -3 2 1 Ave Gi� vo - J"I! (4 ad't- v., FAD DE W D -14 E Y 1�"`,!T R' j A�hb6i�l Ot 5/6 ZIP02YINSURAAICE MARKETING LTD. K. Hansen (156) CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE AS HEREIN DESCRIBED HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED BELOW AND ARE IN FORCE AT THE DATE HEREOF: THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF: NAME OF INSURED CORP. OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, CITY OF PITT RIDGE MEADOWS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION MEADOWS, RIDGE MEADOWS PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES COMMISSION, SCHOOL DISTRICT 42 Box 5000, 11666 Laity St. ABOVE ARE ADDED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED, BUT SOLELY Maple Ride BC V2X 7G5 Attn: Annika Pale of WITH RESPECT TO THE LIABILITY WHICH ARISES OUT OF LOCATION AND OPERATIONS THE ACTPVITIES OF THE NAP iED INSURED TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE APPLIES MAPLE RIDGE, BC "5K & 10K RUNIWALK" JUNE 1, 2008 TO WHOM NOTICE WILL BE MAILED IF SUCH INSURANCE 1S CANCELLED OR IS CHANGED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AFFECT THIS CERTIFICATE Premium: 200.00 Fee: 25.00 Total: 225.00 KIND OF POLICY POLICY NO. INSURERS LIMIT OF LIABILITY GENERAL LIABILITY AS1111 AVIVA INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA $2,000,000.00 INCLUSIVE LIMIT BODILY INJURY/ PROPERTY DAMAGE *DEDUCTIBLE $500.00 S aLi_, POLICY EXTENSIONS�'�tJl a/O "CROSS LIABILITY CLAUSE INCLUDED `PARTICIPANT COVERAGE INCLUDED "SUBJECT TO 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OR MATERIAL CHANGE11 THE INSURANCE AFFORDED IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF THE APPLICABLE POLICY. February 19, 200B ALL SPORT INSURANCE MARKETING LTD. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE M2161 507, 1367 West Broadway, Vancouver, BC V6H 4A9 rose TEL (604) 737-3018 FAX (604) 737-3076 9/b R/6/-90-b09 UOLiPpUnO-I HWH RZ:9i 9i-Udd-ROnz holegato, Annika From: Steve MARTIN [steve,a.martin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 10:55 AM To; Polegato, Annika Cc: mli@mapieridge.org; Derrick KEIST Subject: Hospital Foundation Run Regarding the upcoming event scheduled for Sunday, June 1, 2008. I have approved the course layout and forwarded it to City Hall for their approval. No police office will be available to assist with traffic control. In regards to the presence of auxiliary Constables to assist with traffic control, you will have to speak with Derrick KEIST as he is our Auxiliary coordinator. A/Cpl S.A. MARTIN, 49651 NOC i/c Traffic Services Fridge Meadows RCMP 604-467-7628 q/s R/h/-gQti-tinQ UOLIPPunOA HWM Ri:ca ri-adv-Rnn7. • District of Maple Ridge ■ Beep Roots Greater Heights TO, His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: April 18, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO; E01-035-001 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Run the Ridge EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request has been received from the Run the Ridge - Race Organizing Committee to use municipal streets for the Run the Ridge event on Sunday June 8, 2008 from 5:30 am to 1:30 pm. A copy of the request and traffic control approval is attached. Authorization from Council is required in accordance with the "Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic By- law 3136-1982" to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge. RECOMMENDATION: THAT the use of municipal streets be authorized for the Run the Ridge event on Sunday June 8, 2008 , provided the conditions outlined in Schedule 'A' attached to the staff report dated April 18, 2008 are met. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability for injury or damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as "Schedule A". There is a 5km and 10km route that both start and end at Memorial Peace Park. Preparation for this event will begin at 5:30 am and the 10km event will start promptly at 9:00 am with the 5km event starting at 9:20 AM. The staggered start will ensure both races end at the same time. The clean up on the course will begin at approximately 11:00 am and be completed no later than noon. The awards ceremony is scheduled from 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm: The event, including all remaining clean, up is expected to finish no later than 1:30 pm. 1108 The 5km run participants will travel north on 224 Street, west on 124 Avenue, south on 216 Street, east on Mountainview Crescent, east on 122 Avenue, south on 222 Street, east on Dewdney Trunk Road and south on 224 Street to Memorial Peace Park. The 10km run participants travel north on 224 Street, west on 132 Avenue, south on 216 Street, west on 128 Avenue, south on Laity street, east on 124 Avenue, south on 216 Street, east on Mountainview Crescent, east on 122 Avenue, south on 222 Street, east on Dewdney Trunk Road and south on 224 Street to Memorial Peace Park. A partial closure of 224 Street, north of McIntosh Avenue, will be in place from approximately 9:00 am to 11:00 am. Course marshals and traffic control have been signed off by the RCMP. A map of the routes is outlined in Form `A.' b) Strategic Alignment: Administrating Maple Ridge street events allows the District to manage road infrastructure and associated risks but yet allows events that promote community development, commemorate and celebrate community accomplishments and highlight Maple Ridge's natural and built features. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Permission to use municipal streets may cause some minor delays and inconveniences to other road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the Run the Ridge volunteers. In addition, the organizers will be distributing an information letter to affected businesses and residents. d) Governmental Implications: The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service). e) Business Plan Implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. f) Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices. g) Alternatives: The District could refuse to permit the event to occur at this location. In this event, the organizer may have to cancel the event. CONCLUSIONS: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events and activities. The organizers have requested permission to hold the event on municipal streets for 2008. Submitted by: -'I�heWWood, PhD., PEng. njcipal Engineer., Approved bV Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. GM: Public WorJ%4'8 Development Services Concurrence: J L. (Jim) Rile thief Administrative Officer ML/mi Schedule 'A' To Council Memorandum Dated April 18 2008 Run the Ridge Conditions of Approval Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers: 1. traffic control plans, parking and emergency access to be approved by the RCMP and acceptable to the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District); 2. notify local Fire Department and Ambulance Services of the event; 3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; 4. obtain the required permits from the School District to use their facilities; 5. obtain the required permits from Parks & Leisure Services to use their facilities; 6. must maintain access for emergency services to the area at all times; 7, advertise the event and give notice of the road closure in a local newspaper (a minimum of one week prior to the event date); 8. notify all affected businesses and residents on the event route as soon as possible (per letter provided to the organizer by the District); 9. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any way connected with the event; 10.obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District." Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; and 11. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the District. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw this permission to use municipal streets should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements. Chief Administrative Officer t„• Date: March 11th, 2008 Re: Run the Ridge Road Race —,The oeDl aoois Attention: Mr. Matthew Li Engineering Department Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Traffic Control Plan 1. Course Rout & Description: RUN THE RIDGE c/o 12285 202 Street Maple Ridge, B.C., V2X QT1 Tel: (604) 357-3160 Fax (604) 288-7006 www.RunTheRidge.ca RECENED IN ENGltii-F-RING DEPT, MAR 12 2998 The Run the Ridge 5k and 10k road races will both start and conclude at Memorial Peace Park located at 11925 Haney Place. Both routes head north on 224th thru the Dewdney intersection then weave their way predominantly thru the quiet residential streets of Maple Ridge. After proceeding north on 224th for about 1 kilometers, the 5k route turns west (left) at 124th avenue. Runners and walkers continue for approximately 1 1/2 kilometers until reaching 216th street. Participants then head South for about 1/2 kilometer more to Mountain View Crescent where they then start heading back eastward to the finish via 122 avenue, south (right) on 222 street, east again on Dewdney and down the hoarse stretch back south on 224#h to Memorial Peace Park where the run concludes. k-4' The IOk route continues north on 224th until reaching 232nd avenue where participants turn east (left) into the tranquil and picturesque rural part of Maple Ridge. Runners continue east for about 1 1/2 kilometers turning southbound on 216th thru to the four-way stop intersection on 128 h where they turn west (right) and head towards Laity Street. Runners then continue up Laity street for about 1 km until reaching 120 avenue "Shady Lane" where they head eastbound (left) back towards 216th. Here runners cross a main intersection on 216th and join up with the other 5k runners on the east side of the street before heading south again for approximately 1/7 km until reaching at Mountain View Crescent. Similar to the 5k rout, runners then head east on Mountain View Crescent and 122nd avenue, south (right) on 222 street, east again on Dewdney and down the home stretch back south on 224th to Memorial Peace Park where the l0k race also concludes. 2. Course Marshals & Traffic Control: Both the 5k and 1 Ok routs will be clearly marked and delineated with traffic cones to ensure that participants stay on the sidewalk, curb and/or shoulder wherever possible. Marshals will be placed all throughout the course as indicated on the attached rout map and marked with the symbol TC in yellow circles. With the co-operation of CPL Rob Lennon, 3 auxiliary staff members will be requested to provide traffic control support at key intersections and locations on RUN THE RIDGE the course. Depending on the final number of auxiliary staff available, additional private/professional traffic control personal may be hired to provide further support if needed and recommended by the RCMP Traffic services department. 3. Timing: Preparation for this event will begin at 5:30 AM and the 1 Ok race will start promptly at 9:00 AM with the 5k run/walk starting at 9:20 AM. The staggered start will help ensure that both races conclude at approximately the same time reducing the amount of traffic control necessary at the Dewdney and 224 h intersection. The cleanup on the course will begin at approximately 11 am and be complete by no later than noon. The awards ceremony for both races is scheduled to start promptly at 1 lam and should run for approximately 1 hour. The event including all remaining cleanup at Memorial Peace Park is expected to finish no later than 1:30pm. It is anticipated and encouraged however that participants and their families, particularly those from out of town, stay around to relax and enjoy the hospitality of the local business and restaurants for the remainder of the afternoon. We are also currently making inquiries with the Leisure Center again this year to see if their facilities will be made available to all participants to use before and after the race. For any further clarification, please contact Vid Wadhwani Run the Ridge - Race Organizing Committee Tel (604) 729-7077 • Fax: (604) 288-7006 Email vid@wcsports.ca • Website: www.runtheridge.ca t = y < H. ; 0 lll 14 E doe St Edge., 'fit 1.s7 LO a Fr, sst - w-- 224 St > T 224 St U U o Gsfderl N x p l cc r-- r� - y 223. s !s r� " F t�l�re st r- 3J 222,91 � Isaac 2rvsce11I Deicrssl t V IS AeAD R � St s ~ I cc 22-1 6,a. rQ - 1Fprk. St York St '{ 220 81i m 0. Biacksbck St Devirmn St r1 wiae - CO 21 � Ell y+ 21 < C] V CY-r ^�.� r ' N ti/ F-- ?16 St ._..__ 16 St 216 St HoUy 51ca ;' ! sQ 15 u1 za c a spa t, Gee S1 'W25St L. '¢ -� IR is rU 'IL: ,27 `, 228`a S[ g u : @ Crse "Il St v Greeltareh St r CE b Ift 22a 51 228 St N 22a 51 d Q - --Z7.?_@ 8i { - - m _. us 4 a .y d a Fulton St Q z -- --- 2?; a St _ rlplrhtr St Retcr2; St �Ww V. Z-4 0 227 ss _ !W 61 227 St w 227 51 y m•' < C? Eto Q, F69a 6t t [Ir;n $£ a %Dt q A !U4 iA §1 224 St'Jl y ~ ~ r Gar o St '� 121 5t 4 P22«+ _ "�ii57e :;t 00 F — { V 222 Fl f S i De�:rest 1 a , h _,I. Q r Y m F 271 S1 4 22}• 1 a' 771+I '!,u3it 2215 > YDTk St o YnrK S. t 22LI St x Z. ."'. 21951 - a d Hare• St .... r�nver St �: Q _ &eckstcck $t dv !•t7 S~ - -- iackstcak 3t Day,spn 51 r— i5Ctlflli3 SS - ro `fie r" ._. cM6 W r•\T SC C h ..... _ y 218 m u �a a y C C 4 tl ~� N 21; S t ? 1 St �C En r� h 0r I• (� -- x LO w :A~ - 5 216 51 St 6 st _ F 1 Hnlly ''s UP ,t -- X c c o- a, G1 U a C v . C' x .c Clc'Lti}rt St _ ' 14 S1 M St 214 St 214 St - Casllart St � U. 3.7� 51al ' t'J Lia{y £t � ;a 19T6 EA El I • RaN�UnPI `� '?1257 �� e f rV 212 St ix _ _ --- 132 Ave 3km N. 20 ua - LU w ,M,-Kenny Creek 5 Abuette 129 Ave 0 2krn - - `I -- 128 Ave t- 60 — 6km, �rClj �� �-- ♦MA Y D v+ I � ti `�� i Ave 1 _'k 126 Ave 125Ae I n 125Av IsalcCr 25I co 9Ave ,, m, r` m 1 7km 2km-5 ��` _ Y 1km-5 N u Lee 1f3 Av 1 . --- d Canuck C . ro Stonehouse Cres '23 c1di E5 AV AID ampbell Ave eII $km-3 -- - fS�IOLirYt8lflSllpS_r„ 1 Spelt-�v 121 Ave 10 Gleam 20 �- r�f In? 1 urchA 1 0 r DewdneyTrunk Rd rt I 41 1 Diwdngrftnl kt St'lo I I CaokA e EO ( 119 Ave L 119 Ave 5 No of cones on road Water Station Attendants Barricade Course Marshal Race In Progress MR RCMP r= Arrow Sign Michelle Isley From: Matthew Li Sent: April 22, 2008 11:51 AM To: Michelle Isley Subject: FW: Run the Ridge FYI Matthew Li - Traffic Technician Safer City Project 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge Ph. 604-467-7465 —Original Message — From: Steve MARTIN[mailto:steve.a.martin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca] Sent: April 17, 2008 2:12 PM To: vid@wcsports.ca Cc: Matthew Li; Derrick KEIST Subject: Run the Ridge Regarding the upcoming event scheduled for Sunday, June 8, 2008. 1 have approved the course layout and forwarded it to City Hall for their approval. No police officers will be available to assist with traffic control. In regards to the presence of auxiliary Constables to assist with traffic control, you will have to speak with Derrick KEIST as he is our Auxiliary coordinator. A/Cpl S.A. MARTIN, 49651 NCO i/c Traffic Services Ridge Meadows RCMP 604-467-7628 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson. DATE: Apr. 18, 2008 and Members 'of Council FILE NO: T21-212-003- FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: SUBJECT: Adjustments to 2007 Collector's Roll EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: BC Assessment (BCA) has revised the assessed value for the 2007 Collector's Roll -through the issuance of PAAB Roll 13/2007. The Collector is required to make all the necessary changes to the municipal tax roll records and report these adjustments to Council. RECOMMENDATION: The report dated April 18, 2008 is submitted for information. DISCUSSION: (a) Background Context: One folio is affected: At the direction of the Property Assessment Appeal Board (PAAB), BCA has made adjustments to a multi class folio in the Maple Ridge Industrial Park by reducing the business and utility class portions of the assessment and increasing the residential class portion. (Net Municipal tax decrease, business class $3,041, utility.class $444, net increase residential class, $119) (b) Business Plan/Financial Implications: There will be a total decrease of $5,748 in tax revenue of which the municipal share is $3,366. CONCLUSIONS: An appeal filed with PAAB resulted in a net decrease to the business class assessment base of $243,000, a net decrease to the utility class assessment base of $11,100 and a net increase to the residential class assessment base of $32,700. This report dated April 18, 2008 is submitted for information and is available to the public. Prepared by: Silvia Rutledge Manager of Revenue & Collections Aplydved Paul Gill, S.B.A.; C.G.A. General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer 1131 a , District of Maple Ridge Deep Roofs Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: April 30, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: 3900-20/LAUT FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: ALTERNATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR LOAN AUTHORIZATION BYLAWS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: At the April 8, 2008 Council meeting, three readings were given to the five loan authorization bylaws required to enable the following projects to be accelerated in the Capital Works Program: 1. Construction of Fire Hall No. 4 in the Albion area; 2. Expansion of the existing municipal cemetery; 3. Construction of a new animal shelter on the existing location; 4. Drainage improvements on River Road between Carshill Street and Darby Street; 5. Acquisition of land for future school and park sites. This does not necessarily mean that we will borrow externally as we have some reserves on hand. Payments on this debt are already included in the financial plan and will not result in a further increase in property taxes Council directed at its April 8, 2008 meeting that approval of the electors of these bylaws be obtained through the alternative approval process. Approval of the Inspector of Municipalities was required before that process could begin. The Inspector's approval has now been received. RECOMMENDATION: WHEREAS the District of Maple Ridge ("the District") proposes to: construct a new Fire Hall; expand the municipal cemetery, construct a new animal shelter; improve drainage on River Road and acquire land for future school and park sites ("the projects"); AND WHEREAS the District will require the adoption of loan authorization bylaws under section 179 of the Community Charter to proceed with the projects and has given three readings to Maple Ridge Fire Hall #4 Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6558-2008; Maple Ridge Cemetery Expansion Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6559-2008; Maple Ridge Animal Shelter Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6560-2008; Maple Ridge Joint School and Park Site Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6561-2008; and Maple Ridge River Road Drainage Improvements Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6562-2008 (the "loan authorization bylaws") AND WHEREAS the District may adopt the loan authorization bylaws only with the approval of the electors; AND WHEREAS Council resolved at its April 8, 2008 meeting that approval of the electors shall be sought through the alternative approval process in relation to the loan authorization bylaws following approval of the bylaws by the Inspector of Municipalities; AND WHEREAS approval of the Inspector of Municipalities has been granted; Page 1 1132 132 NOW THEREFORE be it resolved as follows: 1. That the Manager of Legislative Services be authorized to publish, in accordance with the Community Charter, the alternative approval process notices attached as Appendices 1- 5 to the staff report dated April 30, 2008 and titled "Alternative Approval Process For Loan Authorization Bylaws"; 2. That elector responses shall be in the form set out in Appendices 6-10 to the staff report dated April 30, 2008 and titled "Alternative Approval Process For Loan Authorization Bylaws"; 3. That the deadline for the submission of elector response forms shall be 4:00 p.m. on Monday, June 23, 2008; 4. That a fair determination of the total number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge is 47,567; 5. That the staff report dated April 30, 2008 and titled "Alternative Approval Process For Loan Authorization Bylaws", which contains the basis on which the determination of the total number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge to which the approval process applies, shall be made available to the public on request. DISCUSSION 1. Approval of the Electors The District is seeking the approval of the electors through the alternative approval process to incur certain liabilities in relation to the five projects listed below and intends to adopt the loan authorization bylaws to enable these projects to proceed. 1. Construction of Fire Hall No. 4 in the Albion area; 2. Expansion of the existing municipal cemetery; 3. Construction of a new animal shelter on the existing location; 4. Drainage improvements on River Road between Carshill Street and Darby Street; 5. Acquisition of land for future school and park sites. The loan authorization bylaws required the approval of the Inspector of Municipalities following third reading by Council. As this approval has been received, the District may now proceed with the alternative approval process. 2. Alternative Approval Process The alternative approval process is the same process used to obtain approval of the electors for the Downtown Core Loan Authorization Bylaw in 2004 and the Size of Council Bylaw in 2005. Electors who are opposed to any of the loan authorization bylaws may complete an elector response form indicating this opposition and submit the form to Municipal Hall. Approval of the electors to proceed with each bylaw is obtained if, at the end of the time for receiving elector responses indicating that Council may not proceed with the bylaw unless assent of the electors is obtained, the number of responses is no more than 10% of the number of electors. Individuals signing the form must meet the eligibility criteria identified on the form. 3. Notice of Elector Approval Section 86 (2) of the Community Charter states that "Notice of an alternative approval process must be published in accordance with section 94 [public notice] and must include the following. Page 2 (a) a general description of the proposed bylaw, agreement or other matter to which the approval process relates; (b) a description of the area to which the approval process applies; (c) the deadline for elector responses in relation to the approval process; (d) a statement that the council may proceed with the matter unless, by the deadline, at least 10% of the electors of the area indicate that the council must obtain the assent of the electors before proceeding, (e) a statement that (i) elector responses must be given in the form established by the council, (ii) elector response forms are available at the municipal hall, and (iii) the only persons entitled to sign the forms are the electors of the area to which the approval process applies; (f) the number of elector responses required to prevent the council from proceeding without the assent of the electors, determined in accordance with subsection (3); (g) other information required by regulation to be included". Notice has been prepared (attached as Appendices 1-5) for each bylaw that meets all requirements of the Community Charter. Section 86 (3) of the Community Charter states that "For each alternative approval process, the Council must (a) establish the deadline for receiving elector responses, which must be at least 30 days after the second publication of the notice under subsection (2) (b) establish elector response forms, which. (1) may be designed to allow for only a single elector response on each form or for multiple elector responses, and (ii) must be available to the public at the municipal hall from the time of first publication until the deadline, (c) make a fair determination of the total number of electors of the area to which the approval process applies The following discussion addresses these requirements. 4. Elector Response Forms According to section 86 (7) of the Community Charter, the elector response form must include "the person's full name and residential address and, if applicable, the address of the property in relation to which the person is entitled to register as a non-resident property elector". The elector response forms have been prepared (attached as Appendices 6-10) to meet this requirement. A person must not sign any alternative approval process elector response form more than once and may not withdraw his or her name from the alternative approval process elector response form after the deadline for submission of the petitions has passed. Accurate copies of the elector response form may be made and used for signing. 5. Deadline for Receiving Elector Responses It is anticipated that the notices prepared under section 86 (2) of the Community Charter will be published in the May 16, 2008 edition of the local newspaper of record of the District. From that date, information packages including the notices, staff reports and elector response forms will be available upon request at Municipal Hall, and on the District website. We'll also provide copies of the response forms to the Leisure Centre, the ACT, and the Library. The notices will be published for a second time in the May 23, 2008 edition of the local newspaper of record. Page 3 Respecting these dates and the Charter provisions, it is recommended that the deadline for receiving elector responses at Municipal Hall be established as Monday, June 23, 2008 at 4:00 PM. This date is 31 calendar days after the last notice is published on May 23, 2008. Elector response forms may not be submitted by email or facsimile. After the deadline has passed, the corporate officer must determine and certify whether elector approval has been obtained for each loan authorization bylaw. If the corporate officer determines that it has, then the loan authorization bylaw will be submitted to Council for reconsideration and adoption. 6. Number of Electors The area to which the approval process applies is the entire District. In order to establish the number of electors in the District, several sources were considered. A discussion of these sources follows. Elections BC Elections BC has maintained a continuous voters list for more than 70 years. Eligible citizens can register as voters through on --line registration, by visiting their local Service B.C. office or by submitting a registration form by mail, fax or email. Regular updates are also received from ICBC, Vital Statistics and Elections Canada. Elections BC staff conduct ongoing analysis of the quality of the data in the list. This combination of registration activities and analysis allows Elections BC to maintain a voters list that achieves a high level of currency and accuracy. The majority of Lower Mainland municipalities who have conducted an alternative approval process have used this source to determine the number of voters. Metro Vancouver also uses this source. Staff recommends that this source be used for the alternative approval process. As of April 7, 2008 the number of voters on their list for the District of Maple Ridge is 47,567. The number of electors who must submit signed elector response forms in order to prevent the Council from adopting the loan authorization bylaws without the assent of the electors by voting using this number would be 4,757 (10% of voters). Elections Canada Elections Canada was contacted to obtain the number of voters registered from Maple Ridge for federal elections. Elections Canada was unable to provide that information. Numbers are available only for the entire federal riding which encompasses Maple Ridge, Mission and Pitt Meadows. The Sheltair Group Methodology in 2004 and 2005 when the District sought approval of the electors through the alternative approval process for the Downtown Core Loan Authorization Bylaw and the Size of Council Bylaw, the methodology of The Sheltair Group was used to estimate the number of voters. A copy of Sheltair's report, which describes that methodology, is attached as Appendix 1.1. Since that time, Elections BC has improved their data collection through a comprehensive maintenance and improvement program. As identified previously in this report, the majority of municipalities in the lower mainland are using Elections BC as their source for voter estimates. Given the complicated nature of Sheltair's methodology, and the improvements made to the data available from Elections BC, staff is not recommending this methodology be used. Page 4 CONCLUSION: Considering the above discussion, it is recommended that: 1. The Manager of Legislative Services be authorized to publish, in accordance with the Community Charter, the alternative approval process notices attached to this report as Appendices 1-5. 2. Elector response forms be in the form set out in Appendices 6-10 attached to this report. 3. The deadline for the submission of elector response forms be 4:00 p.m. on Monday, June 23, 2008. 4. A fair determination of the total number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge is 47,567. 5. That this report be made available to the public upon request. Prepared by: Ceri Marlo Manager of Legislative Services t App d by: Paul Gill, B.B.A, C.G.A, F.R.M General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services Concurfence J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Y:1Clerks Documen tsTlectionsTlector Approval 20081Staff report re Alternative Approval Process.doe Page 5 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE APPENDIX 1 Notice of Elector Approval Process in relation to Maple Ridge Fire Hall #4 Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6558-2008 Deep Routs Greater Heights The District of Maple Ridge gives notice that it is seeking the approval of the electors to borrow a sum not exceeding $6,000,000 to undertake and carry out or cause to be carried out the construction of Fire Hall #4 in the Albion Area and to do all things necessary in connection with this construction including, but not limited to, the acquisition of all such real property, easements, rights - of -way or authorities as may be requisite or desirable. The maximum term for which debentures may be issued is ten years. Payments on this debt are already included in the financial plan and will not result in a further increase in property taxes. Elector Approval Council may adopt Maple Ridge Fire Hall #4 Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6558 - 2008 unless at least 10% of the electors of the entire District of Maple Ridge sign elector response forms and submit them to the District by the deadline of 4:00 p.m. on June 23, 2008. If 10% of the electors sign and submit elector response forms by the deadline, Council must obtain the assent of the electors before proceeding. This approval process applies to the entire area of the District of Maple Ridge. The District estimates that 4,757 is the number of electors who must submit signed elector response forms in order to prevent the Council from adopting the Bylaw No. 6558 - 2008 without the assent of the electors by voting. Elector responses must be in the form established by the District of Maple Ridge. These forms are available on request from the Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 or may be obtained by visiting the District web site at www.mapleridge.ca, The only persons entitled to sign the forms are electors of Maple Ridge. Copies of Bylaw No. 6558 - 2008, and related documents are available for public inspection at the Municipal Hall, office of the Manager of Legislative Services, during regular business hours. Ceri Marlo Manager of Legislative Services District of Maple Ridge Page 6 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE APPENDIX 2 Notice of Elector Approval Process in relation to MAPLE RIDGE ��� Maple Ridge Cemetery Expansion Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6559-2008 Deep Roots Greater Heights The District of Maple Ridge gives notice that it is seeking the approval of the electors to borrow a sum not exceeding $1,520,000 to undertake and carry out or cause to be carried out the purchase and preparation of property to expand the existing municipal cemetery at 21404 Dewdney Trunk Road and to do all things necessary in connection with this expansion including, but not limited to, the acquisition of all such real property, easements, rights -of -way or authorities as may be requisite or desirable. The maximum term for which debentures may be issued is twenty-five years. Payments on this debt are already included in the financial plan and will not result in a further increase in property taxes. Elector Approval_ Council may adopt Maple Ridge Cemetery Expansion Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6559 - 2008 unless at least 10% of the electors of the entire District of Maple Ridge sign elector response forms and submit them to the District by the deadline of 4:00 p.m. on June 23, 2008. If 10% of the electors sign and submit elector response forms by the deadline, Council must obtain the assent of the electors before proceeding. This approval process applies to the entire area of the District of Maple Ridge. The District estimates that 4,757 is the number of electors who must submit signed elector response forms in order to prevent the Council from adopting the Bylaw No. 6559 - 2008 without the assent of the electors by voting. Elector responses must be in the form established by the District of Maple Ridge. These forms are available on request from the Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 or may be obtained by visiting the District web site at www.mapleridge.ca. The only persons entitled to sign the forms are electors of Maple Ridge. Copies of Bylaw No. 6559 - 2008, and related documents are available for public inspection at the Municipal Hall, office of the Manager of Legislative Services, during regular business hours. Ceri Marlo Manager of Legislative Services District of Maple Ridge Page 7 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE APPENDIX 3 Notice of Elector Approval Process in relation to a• � Maple Ridge Animal Shelter Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6560-2008 Deep Routs Greater Heights The District of Maple Ridge gives notice that it is seeking the approval of the electors to borrow a sum not exceeding $900,000 to undertake and carry out or cause to be carried out the construction of an animal shelter at the existing location on Jackson Road and to do all things necessary in connection with this construction including, but not limited to, the acquisition of all such real property, easements, rights -of -way or authorities as may be requisite or desirable. The maximum term for which debentures may be issued is twenty-five years. Payments on this debt are already included in the financial plan and will not result in a further increase in property taxes. Elector Approval Council may adopt Maple Ridge Animal Shelter Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6560 - 2008 unless at least 10% of the electors of the entire District of Maple Ridge sign elector response forms and submit them to the District by the deadline of 4:00 p.m. on June 23, 2008. If 10% of the electors sign and submit elector response forms by the deadline, Council must obtain the assent of the electors before proceeding. This approval process applies to the entire area of the District of Maple Ridge. The District estimates that 4,757 is the number of electors who must submit signed elector response forms in order to prevent the Council from adopting the Bylaw No. 6560 - 2008 without the assent of the electors by voting. Elector responses must be in the form established by the District of Maple Ridge. These forms are available on request from the Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 or may be obtained by visiting the District web site at www.mapleridge.ca. The only persons entitled to sign the forms are electors of Maple Ridge. Copies of Bylaw No. 6560 - 2008, and related documents are available for public inspection at the Municipal Hall, office of the Manager of Legislative Services, during regular business hours. Ceri Marlo Manager of Legislative Services District of Maple Ridge Page 9 t DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE APPENDIX 4 Notice of Elector Approval Process in relation to Maple Ridge Joint School and Park Site Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6561-2008 Deep Roots Greater Heights The District of Maple Ridge gives notice that it is seeking the approval of the electors to borrow a sum not exceeding $10,671,185 to undertake and carry out or cause to be carried out the purchases of the land to incorporate three future joint school and park sites including, but not limited to, the acquisition of all such real property, easements, rights -of -way or authorities as may be requisite or desirable for or in connection with this purchase. School District No. 42 is entering into an agreement with the District of Maple Ridge to repay the District for the purchase of those future school sites. Borrowing will not occur until this agreement is finalized. The park portions of the future sites are already included within existing funding sources identified in the Financial Plan. The maximum term for which debentures may be issued is five years. Payments on this debt are already included in the financial plan and will not result in a further increase in property taxes. ElectorAp roval Council may adopt Maple Ridge Joint School and Park Site Loan Authorization Bylaw No.6561- 2008 unless at least 10% of the electors of the entire District of Maple Ridge sign elector response forms and submit them to the District by the deadline of 4:00 p.m. on June 23, 2008. If 10% of the electors sign and submit elector response forms by the deadline, Council must obtain the assent of the electors before proceeding. This approval process applies to the entire area of the District of Maple Ridge. The District estimates that 4,757 is the number of electors who must submit signed elector response forms in order to prevent the Council from adopting the Bylaw No. 6561- 2008 without the assent of the electors by voting. Elector responses must be in the form established by the District of Maple Ridge. These forms are available on request from the Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 or may be obtained by visiting the District web site at www.mapleridge.ca. The only persons entitled to sign the forms are electors of Maple Ridge. Copies of Bylaw No. 6561- 2008, and related documents are available for public inspection at the Municipal Hall, office of the Manager of Legislative Services, during regular business hours. Ceri Marlo Manager of Legislative Services District of Maple Ridge Page 9 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE APPENDIX 5 Notice of Elector Approval Process in relation to MAPLE British Columbia Maple Ridge River Road Drainage Improvements Loan Authorization Deep Roots Greater Heights Bylaw No. 6562 -2008 The District of Maple Ridge gives notice that it is seeking the approval of the electors to borrow a sum not exceeding $2,675,000 to undertake and carry out or cause to be carried out the improvement -to drainage on River Road between Carshill Street and Darby Street and to do all things necessary in connection with those improvements. The maximum term for which debentures may be issued is five years. Payments on this debt are already included in the financial plan and will not result in a further increase in property taxes. Elector Approval Council may adopt Maple Ridge River Road Drainage Improvements Loan Authorization Bylaw No.. 6562 - 2008 unless at least 10% of the electors of the entire District of Maple Ridge sign elector response forms and submit them to the District by the deadline of 4:00 p.m. on June 23, 2008. If 10% of the electors sign and submit elector response forms by the deadline, Council must obtain the assent of the electors before proceeding. This approval process applies to the entire area of the District of Maple Ridge. The District estimates that 4,757 is the number of electors who must submit signed elector response forms in order to prevent the Council from adopting the Bylaw No. 6562 - 2008 without the assent of the electors by voting. Elector responses must be in the form established by the District of Maple Ridge. These forms are available on request from the Municipal Hall, J-1995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 or may be obtained by visiting the District web site at www.mapleridge.ca. The only persons entitled to sign the forms are electors of Maple Ridge. Copies of Bylaw No. 6562 - 2008, and related documents are available for public inspection at the Municipal Hall, office of the Manager of Legislative Services, during regular business hours. Ceri Marlo Manager of Legislative Services District of Maple Ridge Page 10 APPENDIX 6 Maple Ridge Fire Hall #4 Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6558-2008 • ALTERNATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS ELECTOR RESPONSE FORM Deep Roots Greater Heights I am OPPOSED to the District of Maple Ridge proceeding with the adoption of Bylaw No. 6558-2008, which authorizes the borrowing of a sum not exceeding $6,000,000 to undertake and carry out or cause to be carried out the construction of Fire Hall #4 in the Albion Area and to do all things necessary in connection with this construction including, but not limited to, the acquisition of all such real property, easements, rights -of -way or authorities as may be requisite or desirable. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that: a I am eighteen years of age or older; and • 1 am a Canadian citizen; and • 1 have resided in British Columbia for at least the last six months; and • I have resided in the District of Maple Ridge for at least the last thirty days OR I am, or have been a registered owner of real property in the District of Maple Ridge and I have (if there is more than one registered owner) the written consent of a majority of the registered owners of that property to be the only person entitled to sign an elector response form as a non-resident property elector in relation to that property; and a I am not disqualified by the Local Government Act or any other enactment or otherwise disqualified by law from voting in location elections; and I am entitled to sign this alternative approval process elector response form and have not previously signed an alternative approval process elector response form for the proposed bylaw. All alternative approval process elector response forms must be received by the Manager of Legislative Services, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 on or before 4:00 p.m. on Monday, June 23, 2008. Regular office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, statutory holidays excluded. Elector response forms may not be submitted by email or facsimile. Address of the property in Elector's Full Name Residential Address relation to which you are Signature of elector (Print - No initials) entitled to register as a non- resident property elector (if applicable) NOTE: A person must not sign any alternative approval process elector response form more than once and may not withdraw his or her name from the alternative approval process elector response form after the deadline for submission of the petitions has passed. Accurate copies of this elector response form may be made and used for signing. You must meet the requirements above in order to sign this form. The number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge is estimated to be 47,567. If 10% (4,757) of the estimated number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge sign an alternative approval process elector response form opposing the bylaw, Council will not be able to proceed without then receiving the assent of the electors. Page 1 I APPENDIX 7 Maple Ridge Cemetery Expansion Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6559-2008 r ALTERNATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS ELECTOR RESPONSE FORM Deep Roots Greater Heights I am OPPOSED to the District of Maple Ridge proceeding with the adoption of Bylaw No. 6559-2008, which authorizes the borrowing of a sum not exceeding $1,520,000 to undertake and carry out or cause to be carried out the purchase and preparation of property to expand the existing municipal cemetery at 21404 Dewdney Trunk Road and to do all things necessary in connection with this expansion including, but not limited to, the acquisition of all such real property, easements, rights -of - way or authorities as may be requisite or desirable. 1, the undersigned, hereby certify that: • 1 am eighteen years of age or older; and • 1 am a Canadian citizen; and • 1 have resided in British Columbia for at least the last six months; and • 1 have resided in the District of Maple Ridge for at least the last thirty days OR I am, or have been a registered owner of real property in the District of Maple Ridge and I have (if there is more than one registered owner) the written consent of a majority of the registered owners of that property to be the only person entitled to sign an elector response form as a non-resident property elector in relation to that property; and • I am not disqualified by the Loca/ Government Act or any other enactment or otherwise disqualified by law from voting in location elections; and I am entitled to sign this alternative approval process elector response form and have not previously signed an alternative approval process elector response form for the proposed bylaw. All alternative approval process elector response forms must be received by the Manager of Legislative Services, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 on or before 4:00 p.m. on Monday, June 23, 2008. Regular office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, statutory holidays excluded. Elector response forms may not be submitted by email or facsimile. Address of the property in Elector's Full Name Residential Address relation to which you are Signature of elector (Print - No initials) entitled to register as a non- resident property elector (if applicable) NOTE: A person must not sign any alternative approval process elector response form more than once and may not withdraw his or her name from the alternative approval process elector response form after the deadline for submission of the petitions has passed. Accurate copies of this elector response form may be made and used for signing. You must meet the requirements above in order to sign this form. The number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge is estimated to be 47,567. If 10% (4,757) of the estimated number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge sign an alternative approval process elector response form opposing the bylaw, Council will not be able to proceed without then receiving the assent of the electors. Page 12 APPENDIX 8 Maple Ridge Animal Shelter Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6560-2008 ALTERNATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS ELECTOR RESPONSE FORM Deep Roots Greater Heights I am OPPOSED to the District of Maple Ridge proceeding with the adoption of Bylaw No. 6560-2008, which authorizes the borrowing of a sum not exceeding $900,000 to undertake and carry out or cause to be carried out the construction of an animal shelter at the existing location on Jackson Road and to do all things necessary in connection with this construction including, but not limited to, the acquisition of all such real property, easements, rights -of -way or authorities as may be requisite or desirable. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that: • 1 am eighteen years of age or older; and a I am a Canadian citizen; and • 1 have resided in British Columbia for at least the last six months; and • 1 have resided in the District of Maple Ridge for at least the last thirty days OR l am, or have been a registered owner of real property in the District of Maple Ridge and I have (if there is more than one registered owner) the written consent of a majority of the registered owners of that property to be the only person entitled to sign an elector response form as a non-resident property elector in relation to that property; and 1 am not disqualified by the Local Govemment Act or any other enactment or otherwise disqualified by law from voting in location elections; and 0 1 am entitled to sign this alternative approval process elector response form and have not previously signed an alternative approval process elector response form for the proposed bylaw. All alternative approval process elector response forms must be received by the Manager of Legislative Services, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 on or before 4:00 p.m. on Monday, June 23, 2008. Regular office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, statutory holidays excluded. Elector response forms may not be submitted by email or facsimile. Address of the property in Elector's Full Name Residential Address relation to which you are Signature of elector (Print - No initials) entitled to register as a non- resident property elector (if applicable) NOTE: A person must not sign any alternative approval process elector response form more than once and may not withdraw his or her name from the alternative approval process elector response form after the deadline for submission of the petitions has passed. Accurate copies of this elector response form may be made and used for signing. You must meet the requirements above in order to sign this form. The number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge is estimated to be 47,567. If 10% (4,757) of the estimated number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge sign an alternative approval process elector response form opposingthe bylaw, Council will not be able to proceed without then receiving the assent of the electors. Page 13 . APPENDIX 9 Maple Ridge Joint School and Park Site Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6561-2008 r ALTERNATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS ELECTOR RESPONSE FORM Deep Roots Greater Heights I am OPPOSED to the District of Maple Ridge proceeding with the adoption of Bylaw No. 6561-2008, which authorizes the borrowing of a sum not exceeding $10,671,185 to undertake and carry out or cause to be carried out the purchases of the land to incorporate three future joint school and park sites including, but not limited to, the acquisition of all such real property, easements, rights -of -way or authorities as may be requisite or desirable for or in connection with this purchase. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that: • 1 am eighteen years of age or older; and • 1 am a Canadian citizen; and • 1 have resided in British Columbia for at least the last six months; and • 1 have resided in the District of Maple Ridge for at least the last thirty days OR I am, or have been a registered owner of real property in the District of Maple Ridge and I have (if there is more than one registered owner) the written consent of a majority of the registered owners of that property to be the only person entitle_ d to sign an elector response form as a non-resident property elector in relation to that property; and • I am not disqualified by the Local Government Act or any other enactment or otherwise disqualified by law from voting in location elections; and • 1 am entitled to sign this alternative approval process elector response form and have not previously signed an alternative approval process elector response form for the proposed bylaw. All alternative approval process elector response forms must be received by the Manager of Legislative Services, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC . V2X 6A9 on or before 4:00 p.m. on Monday, June 23, 2008. Regular office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, statutory holidays excluded. Elector response forms may not be submitted by email or facsimile. Address of the property in Elector's Full Name Residential Address relation to which you are Signature of elector (Print - No initials) entitled to register as a non- resident property elector (if applicable) NOTE: A person must not sign any alternative approval process elector response form more than once and may not withdraw his or her name from the alternative approval process elector response form after the deadline for submission of the petitions has passed. Accurate copies of this elector response form may be made and used for signing. You must meet the requirements above in order to sign this form. The number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge is estimated to be 47,567. If 10% (4,757) of the estimated number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge sign an alternative approval process elector response form opposing the bylaw, Council will not be able to proceed without then receiving the assent of the electors. Page 14 APPENDIX 10 Deep Roots Greater Heights Maple Ridge River Road Drainage Improvements Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6562-2008 ALTERNATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS ELECTOR RESPONSE FORM I am OPPOSED to the District of Maple Ridge proceeding with the adoption of Bylaw No. 6562-2008, which authorizes the borrowing of a sum not exceeding $2,675,000 to undertake and carry out or cause to be carried out the improvement to drainage on River Road between Carshill Street and Darby Street and to do all things necessary in connection with those improvements. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that: • 1 am eighteen years of age or older; and 1 am a Canadian citizen; and • 1 have resided in British Columbia for at least the last six months; and 0 1 have resided in the District of Maple Ridge for at least the last thirty days OR I am, or have been a registered owner of real property in the District of Maple Ridge and I have (if there is more than one registered owner) the written consent of a majority of the registered owners of that property to be the only person entitled to sign an elector response form as a non-resident property elector in relation to that property; and • 1 am not disqualified by the Local Govemment Act or any other enactment or otherwise disqualified by law from voting in location elections; and a I am entitled to sign this alternative approval process elector response form and have not previously signed an alternative approval process elector response form for the proposed bylaw. All alternative approval process elector response forms must be received by the Manager of Legislative Services, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 on or before 4:00 p.m. on Monday, June 23, 2008. Regular office hours are 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, statutory holidays excluded. Elector response forms may not be submitted by email or facsimile. Address of the property in Elector's Full Name Residential Address relation to which you are Signature of elector (Print - No initials) entitled to register as a non- resident property elector (if applicable) NOTE: A person must not sign any alternative approval process elector response form more than once and may not withdraw his or her name from the alternative approval process elector response form after the deadline for submission of the petitions has passed. Accurate copies of this elector response form may be made and used for signing. You must meet the requirements above in order to sign this form. The number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge is estimated to be 47,567. If 10% (4,757) of the estimated number of electors of the District of Maple Ridge sign an alternative approval process elector response form opposing the bylaw, Council will not be able to proceed without then receiving the assent of the electors. Page 15 r The Sheltair Group 2 - 3661 West 4th Avenue, Vancouver BC Canada V6R 1 P2 T. 604-732-9106 F. 604-732-9238 www.sheitair.com APPENDIX M E M O R A N D U M To: Terry Fryer,. District of Maple Ridge From: Lyle Walker, MCIP, The Sheltair Group Date: June 10, 2004 Subject: Estimate of Eligible Voters in Maple Ridge, June 2004 This memo summarizes an estimate of the eligible voters in Maple Ridge, June 2004. Data was obtained from two sources and a separate calculation was conducted to determine the population that is: a) 18 years or older b) Canadian citizens c) a resident of BC for the last 6 months d) a resident of Maple Ridge for the last 30 days, and e) not otherwise disqualified (a person in custody or a person confined to a psychiatric institution). 1) Elections Canada Data The number of electors on lists from Elections Canada in June 2004 was 44,258 for the District of Maple Ridge. This estimate was obtained from the Dewdney-Allouette Electoral District office for Elections Canada (1- 866-499-8026) and obtained on June 7, 2004. Data for the entire Electoral District, which includes Pitt Meadows, Maple Ridge, and Mission, is also available on their -web site. The voters list is currently being updated due to the upcoming June 28th federal election. Therefore the above figure is an interim number which will changeover the next few weeks. A revised estimate will be available on or after June 22nd. A third estimate is obtained on the actual voting day for those who actually vote. - urban Sustainability - Green Buildings Resource Management • Building Science - r-eAffi'mEll The Sheltair Group 2 • 3661 West 4th Avenue, Vancouver BC Canada V6R 1 P2 V T.604-732-9106 F.604.732-9238 www.sheitair.com Summary of key information from the Elections Canada website The Elections Canada data is from the National Register of Electors - a database of Canadians who are qualified to vote. It contains basic information about each person - name, address, sex and date of birth. Canadians may choose whether or not to have their names included in the Register. If an elector chooses not to be listed in the database, his or her right to vote is still protected. The information in the National Register of Electors is used to produce the preliminary voters lists for federal elections, by-elections and referendums. It may also be used to produce voters lists for provinces, territories, municipalities and school boards that have signed agreements with Elections Canada, as permitted by the Canada Elections Act and provincial statutes. About 20 percent of elector information changes every year. The National Register of Electors is updated with information (name, sex, date of birth, and address) supplied by provincial, territorial and federal data sources between electoral events, and by electors themselves during federal electoral events. Elections Canada has signed agreements with data suppliers, including the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, Citizenship and Immigration Canada, provincial and territorial registrars of motor vehicles and vital statistics, and provincial electoral agencies with permanent lists of electors. Therefore, Elections Canada makes every effort to ensure the voters list is accurate and updated. Source: www.elections.ca 2) Elections BC Data According to information provided by Terry Fryer, the number of. registered voters from Elections BC was 34,089 for the District of Maple Ridge. Due to the time constraints for this project, this number and data source was not investigated further. It was also believed that this number was low and the data not as well updated as the Elections Canada data. Source for additional information: www.elections.bc.ca ig Urban Sustainability - Green Buildings - Resource Management • Building Science " The Sheltair Group 2 - 3661 West 4th Avenue, Vancouver BC Canada V6R 1 P2 ,._, V m T:604.732-9106 F.,604.732-9238 www.sheitoir.com 3) Sheltair Calculations To obtain an order of magnitude calculation of the number of eligible voters, a series of calculations was conducted, primarily based on Census data and data from BC Stats. a) Calculate total population 18 years of age and older The total population in June 2004 was estimated to be 73,000. This was based on using the BC Stats population estimate for 2003 of 71,400 and factoring up the population by the population growth rate of 2.25% projected _for 2003-2004 for the Maple Ridge Local Health Area (which includes Pitt Meadows). The proportion of the population aged 18 years of age and older was estimated to be 73.2% of the population for the District of Maple Ridge in 2001 based on Census data. This was compared to the value for the Maple Ridge Local Health Area for 2001, which was approximately equal at 73.9%. Since the population is aging, the BC Stats projection by age cohort for the Maple Ridge Local Health Area was used to approximate the proportion of the population in June 2004 that were 18 years of age and older. This value of the proportion of the population that was 18 years of age and older was estimated to be approximately 75.7% in June 2004. This proportion of 75.7% was multiplied by the estimated population of 73,000 in 2004 to obtain an estimate of 55,300 people that were 18 years of age and older. b) Reduce the amount by the share of those who are not Canadian Citizens Then it is necessary to reduce this amount by the proportion of the population that are not Canadian citizens. Based on the data from the 2001 census, 95.6% of the population were Canadian Citizens. c) Reduce the amount by the share who are not residents of BC for the last 6 months and not a resident of Maple Ridge for last 30 days Approximately 1.2% of the population in Maple Ridge moved to Maple Ridge from outside BC or outside Canada in the year prior to the 2001 census. Taking half this rate for the last 6 month period would mean - Urban Sustainability - Green Buildings - Resource Management - Building Science - The Sheltair Group 2 - 3661 West 4th Avenue, Vancouver BC Canada V6R 1 P2 T.604-732-4106 F.604-732.9238 www.sheltair.com approximately 0.6% of the population would have not been residents of BC in the last 6 months. Similarly, 5.2% of the population in Maple Ridge moved within a year prior to the Census to Maple Ridge. Dividing this by. 12 for the 12 months in the year was done to obtain an estimate of the population that was not a resident of Maple Ridge in the last 30 days. d) Take into account the ineligible voters who are disqualified (a person in custody or a person confined to a psychiatric institution) This calculation was not done. However, there are approximately 900 persons who lived in collective dwellings in 2001 in Maple Ridge. Some of these may be a person in custody or a person confined to a psychiatric institution. e) Result and limitations Following the above calculations, the total estimated population of eligible voters in June 2004 is 52,320 before rounding. As this is a ballpark estimate of eligible voters, a rounded number of 52,000 is suggested to reflect a reduced level of accuracy that can be expected for the calculation. The lower rounded number would also help account for the fact that the disqualified individuals .(a person in custody or a person confined to a psychiatric institution are not included) were not factored into the estimate. Due to the difficulty of obtaining a detailed estimated for a particular month and for the period of residency, many assumptions were made to conduct the calculation. The most difficult assumptions which may vary considerably from the actual result would be the number of Canadian citizens and the calculations around period of residency. These calculations were based on rates from historical data from the 2001 census which may differ from actual amounts for 2004. These limitations should be noted when using the estimate provided. The Sheltair calculations give an order of magnitude calculation of the total population that would be eligible to vote in Maple Ridge. It would be an upper estimate of the actual numbers. The calculation indicates that the Elections Canada number is more reasonable than the one for Elections BC. .10� 4 - Urban sustainability • Green Buildings - Resource Management - Building science ,AV:The Sheltair Group gl2 - 3661 West 4th Avenue, Vancouver BC Canada V6R 1 P2 T. 604-732.9106 F. 604-732-9238 www,shettair.com Recommendation: It is recommended that the District use the Elections Canada estimate of 44,258 as the number of electors on lists rather than the Elections BC number. It should be noted that the Elections Canada estimate does not reflect those electors who choose not to be on the list of electors. There will also be a margin of error due to the challenges with keeping the Elections Canada list up to date and keeping track of people who move. Therefore the Elections Canada number is likely a lower -bound for the number of eligible voters. The estimate conducted using BC _ Stats data, data from the last census, and a number of assumptions yielded an estimate of 52,000. The 52,000 estimate would be a reasonable upper -bound and can be used in conjunction with the Elections Canada estimate to provide a reasonable range for the number of eligible voters. Should the District wish to wait a few weeks, a revised Elections Canada number will be available on or around ,dune 22nd. MEM9-1 M 5 Urban Sustainability - Green Buildings - Resource Management - Building Science District of Maple Ridge Deep Roats Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: April 11, 2008 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATfN: C.O.W. SUBJECT: SCHOOL PLAYGROUND. FUNDING ASSISTANCE REQUEST FROM MAPLE RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Ms Julie Radil (Chairperson of the Maple Ridge Elementary School PAC) has made a formal written request for Municipal funding assistance for their school playground project. (Letter attached) The Commission considered the subject at their meeting of April 10, 2008. The Commissions recommendation follows: RECOMMENDATION: That the request of Maple Ridge Elementary School PAC for funding assistance for their school playground equipment be respectfully declined, noting that three neighborhood parks are situated very close to and surrounding the school site in the same neighborhood. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The Maple Ridge Elementary PAC are aware of the recent Provincial playground equipment grant awards provided to two Pitt Meadows Elementary schools, as well as the additional municipal funding that was used to assist with those two projects. This' application for assistance differs from the Pitt Meadows projects in that the funding had already been incorporated into the 5 year capital plan to replace the PME playground, as the existing playground equipment at Pitt Meadows Elementary was required to be moved as part of the cenotaph and spirit square project. In this case, because two schools were fortunate enough to be awarded Provincial grants for this, the municipal budget was brought forward one year to permit completion of both school projects at no additional costs to Pitt Meadows residents. It is also the case that there are no neighborhood parks close to Davie Jones School other than on the other side of the CP Rail line. In the case of the Maple Ridge Elementary project the school is also benefitting from a provincial playground grant, and has requested municipal funding. The reasons for declining the request are a) there is no funding in the budget, and b) The request does not fit within the current policy (see below). b) Desired Outcome: Currently there are no funds identified in the Maple Ridge 5 year capital budget for this purpose c) Policy: 1151 This request does not meet the criteria for allocation of funds in the Commission's policy in this regard, as there are playground opportunities in fairly close proximity to Maple Ridge Elementary School which is located at approx 115 Avenue / between 208 Street and 209 Street (policy attached) For example: Camwood Park is located at approx 117 Avenue / between 208 Street and 209 Street (just north of Maple Ridge Elementary school. Jordan Park is located at approx 116 Avenue / 210 Street (just east of the school) Hammond Stadium Park is also located at 115 Avenue and 206 Street {just west of the school). (Photos showing proximity of other parks playgrounds attached for reference) d) Alternatives: The School PAC may wish to consider exploring other fund raising opportunities that may be available to them. CONCLUSIONS: Parks staff visited the parks sites in the immediate area of the school, and confirmed that the neighborhood park standard has been met in this particular case. Staff have also confirmed that the school currently has a mix of both new and older play structures, as the playground that was previously located at Maple Ridge Primary (when it was closed), was also moved to Maple Ridge Elementary. Concu Concurrence. •I M9 General 4nagor Community Development Parks & ROcreation Services (Jim) Rule ;f Administrative Officer February 20, 2008 Mr. David Boog, Director of Parks and Facilities, District of Maple Ridge", 1195 Haney Place, Maple Ridge,. B.C. V2X 6A9 Dear Mr Boog, Further to our conversation on Feb. 11, 2008, regarding the Playground grant from Actnow SC and -the Provincial government awarded to Maple Ridge Elementary, we would like to ask for support from the district on the installation of the playground equipment. This grant has been very exciting news for the students and their families of this . school. as there has been much anticipation on having an intermediate playground here for many years. As you may be aware, there is a lack of playground equipment available in Maple Ridge Elementary's catchment for the intermediate school age child. The small parks east of the school and In this area have mature playgrounds geared for the pre- school child. It would be worth noting that approximately 75% of Maple Ridge Elementary population lives east of the school, where there are no playground facilities available to them. The PAC, the MRE Playground Committee and the school Administration are ' aggressively fundraising for this project.. However, we feel that we will fall short of our goal due to the time constraint. An opportunity of this nature would be a very difficult one to lose. The Provincial government has seen a fundamental need for children to be active for their overall growth and .development. We are certain that the District of Maple Ridge shares these values as well. We respectfully ask for your support in means of either monetary funds or supplies to aid us in helping this project come to completion before the December 2O08 deadline, if we fail to reach our goalby the deadline, the children in the area may fail to meet theirpotential. development physically and mentally for many years to come. Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter. Please contact me with any recommendations or offers that the District may have in order to facilitate the completion of this playground for the intermediate children of the area. Sincere Regards, Julie Radii . Maple Ridge Elementary PAC Chair 20820 River Road, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 1V -21- RIDGE MEADOWS PARKS AND LEISURE SERVICES pAR%S 5 IHSURE SaW CES TITLE:. Cost-sharing of Play Equipment on Adjacent. School/Park Sites AUTHORITY: Parks and Leisure Services EFFECTIVE DATE: Iuunediately Commission August 1996 POLICY NO. SUPERSEDES: g ----- APPROVAL: May 1998 POLICY STATEMENT: `Rid a Meadows Parks and Leisure Services Commission is committed to providing The g suitable play equipment on adjacent school/park sites andwilllion of play equipment cost installation of such equipment .as budgets permit- Consider sharing will be considered on a site by site basis for school. Lands which are not immediately adjacent to park sites, in neighbourhoods where open space and.play equipment are at a premium. PURPOSE: To provide playground equipment through parmershn p. with the school district in neighbourhoods where. open space and play equipment is at a premium- DEFINITIONS: the neral park/s chool sites where partnerships have been established would be avaiiab tenaneeements public/school use. General public access would have to be assured and main gr put in place before such a partnership could proceed. Policy Manual -22- ILLI �P Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson DATE: 2008 04 21 and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole Parks and Leisure Services Commission Bylaw Amendment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council recently directed that staff bring forward an amendment to the Parks and Leisure Services Commission by-law to permit all members of the Commission the opportunity to be elected as the Chair and Vice Chair of the Commission. The amending bylaw is attached for Council consideration. In order to complete the change the Joint Leisure Services Agreement with the City of Pitt Meadows also needs to be amended. The draft amended wording for the agreement is also attached (para. 4 (f) and (g)). We have also taken the liberty of adjusting the references to Pitt Meadows from "District of Pitt Meadows" to "City of Pitt Meadows" which occur in various places in the agreement. These are the only changes being proposed. RECOMMENDATION(S): That Parks and Leisure Services Commission Amending Bylaw No. 6568-2008 be read a first, second and third time; and further, that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the revised Joint Parks and Leisure Services Agreement attached to the 2008 04 21 report on this subject once and if final reading is given to the amending bylaw. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The Commission wishes to extend the opportunity to Chair Commission meetings to all members including at large members. Providing that opportunity is felt by the Commission to be appropriate to enhance the level of at large member involvement. Four at large members are appointed to the Commission by Maple Ridge Council and two are appointed by the Pitt Meadows Council. Three members of each Council (including both Mayors) and three members of the School Board (including the Board Chair) also serve on the Commission. b) Desired Outcome(s): The desired outcome is to ensure the Commission is functioning at optimal levels. 1152 c) Strategic Alignment: Providing citizens with opportunities for meaningful involvement in the governance of various aspects of the Municipal operations is part of Council's strategic direction. d) Policy Implications: Citizen at large appointees serve as Chair in several other Municipal Advisory Committees. It is acknowledged that the Commission does differ from the Advisory Committees in that it does have some independent decision making authority for items delegated to it by the Councils. Having said that key responsibilities like authorizing capital expenditures and adopting the annual budget remain with the Councils. All members of the Commission already have a vote on all matters coming before the Commission. CONCLUSIONS: A suggestion was made at the January Commission meeting that all members of the Commission should be eligible to stand for election to the positions of Commission Chair and Vice Chair. A by law amendment and an amendment to the Joint Parks and leisure Services Agreement are required to approve the change. } by: Mike Murray Gener Mana : o munity Development, Parks and Recreation J.L. (JiO Rule Chief Administrative Officer MWM Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 6568-2008 A Bylaw to amend Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services Commission Bylaw No. 6302-2005 WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services Commission Bylaw No. 6302-2005; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as " Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services Commission Amending Bylaw No. 6568-2008" 2. That Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services Commission Bylaw No. 6302- 2005 be amended by: i) Deleting Paragraph 9 (a) in its entirety and replacing with: "elect a Chair and Vice Chair from among its membership at the first meeting of each year. All members of the Commission, including at large members, shall be eligible to be elected as Chair or Vice Chair." READ a first time on the day of , 200. READ a second on time the day of 7200. READ a third time on the day of , 200. RECONSIDERED and ADOPTED this day of 7200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER - 1 - Commission 2. The Commission shall be comprised of the following members: (a) three members of each Council including both Mayors, (b) three members of the School District No. 42 Board of Trustees including the Chair, and (c) six citizens at large members two of whom shall reside in Pitt Meadows and four of whom shall reside in Maple Ridge to be appointed by the Councils of the communities in which they reside. 3. AlI members of the Commission shall have the privilege of full participation in the discussion and debate on the matters placed before it and will also have the right to place motions on the floor for consideration in accordance with standard rules of order, and all members shall be entitled to vote on matters placed before the Commission. The Commission shall (a) function as an independent policy making body; (b) have operating authority for the provision of parks, leisure and cultural services and for entering into agreements and contractual obligations within the limitations of approved budgets in accordance with the authority delegated to the Commission by bylaws adopted by both Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Councils. (c) have authority to spend money within a budget approved by the Municipalities. (d) utilize the services of Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows staff and various contractors as deemed appropriate to deliver services noting that the District of Maple Ridge shall be the primary employer of staff resources; (e) establish such ad hoc committees as may be required from time to time to provide the Commission with advice on specific policies, proposals and initiatives; (f) elect a Chair from among its members each year in February who shall preside over the proceedings of all meetings of the Commission for the coming year (g) elect a Vice Chair from among its members each year in February to preside over the meetings of the Commission for the coming year if the Chair is absent. (h) submit to the Municipalities by the first of October each year the business and financial plan for operating costs and capital costs for Parks and Leisure Services; (i) meet a minimum of one time each month with the exception of the month of August; (j) forward minutes of all meetings to both Councils, provide regular reports of the activities of the Commission to each of the Councils every three months and submit an Annual report before the end of April each year for the prior year; and 4 A E Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Gordon Robson and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer DATE: April 29, 2008 FILE NO: ATTN: C.O.W. Funding Request from the Maple Ridge - Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The attached request for funding from the Maple Ridge -- Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association has been forwarded to staff for a report. The District's Agricultural Advisory Committee Supports the request for funding. RECOMMENDATION: That staff be directed to work with the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association to develop a fee for service agreement in which the District would provide up to $12,000 each year for three years, subject to annual budget reviews, in return for the Association accepting responsibility for a variety of agriculturally oriented education activities including the operation of an annual country fair, noting that this agreement is in addition to any funding support available to the Association through the annual Festivals budget and the Association's lease of the Maple Ridge Fair Grounds at no cost. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context. As Council is aware the organization has had a very long history in the community and the Municipality has always made an effort to ensure the Fair has a permanent site, In fact the old "Aggie" grounds were located in the heart of Maple Ridge where all our public facilities are now located. The Association moved its event from downtown Maple Ridge in 1956 when the current Fairgrounds were purchased for that specific purpose. The Association finds itself at a crossroads at this point given its dependency on admissions and the uncertainty of the weather. They are primarily concerned about ensuring that young people in our community continue to have the opportunity to learn about the importance of agriculture in all our lives. They do that through the annual "Country Fest" where 4H participants come to compete and the public gets to see farm animals "up close and personal". They have also been visiting schools and bringing farm animals to children to help them understand agriculture better. Unfortunately for events like this to survive without a consistent source of funding, which is not weather dependent, the Association, like many other Fairs, has had to risk booking expensive musical acts (which may or may not draw crowds depending on the weather) and run beer gardens to make ends meet. The Association would prefer to focus on agricultural education and wish to reach out to families. To do so they are requesting that Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows contribute proportionately toward an annual grant of $15,000 ($12,000 from Maple Ridge and 1153 $3,000 from Pitt Meadows). Funding from other sources has already been obtained (i.e. from Gaming and from the Metro Vancouver Agricultural Advisory Committee). They have provided evidence of many significantly higher grants provided to other Agricultural Fairs by the communities in which they are held. To be clear the Association is requesting this ongoing amount be provided on top of the in kind support provided through the festival grant program administered by Parks and Leisure Services which amounts to just under $5,000 and the $3500 amount being provided this year through the UBCM tourism program to generate greater regional interest. The former is primarily in kind support necessary to prepare the site for the Country Festival with a small amount of direct funding made available (about $1,600). The UBCM funding will need to be channeled to regional advertising since that is its purpose and it is only available for 2008 as far as we know. To reach out to families the Association will also be moving to a free admission format similar to Pitt Meadows Day, the Christmas Festival and other family oriented events in the community. Since the focus is to be on Agricultural Education it is suggested that Council consider entering into a three year fee for service agreement with the Association for the amount requested with deliverables such as: 1. providing a low cost "Country Festival" which is easily accessible to families and supports 4H activities along with promoting agriculture 2. providing agriculturally oriented educational opportunities to schools commensurate with the resources available to the organization 3. providing support in collaboration with the CEED Centre and others for community gardens and school gardens 4. participating in the Agricultural advisory Committee This approach is consistent with the fee for service agreements already in place with ARMS and KEEPS for their environmental education work. It may be appropriate to administer the relationship through the Agricultural Advisory Committee to ensure the work of the Association is complementary to the work of the committee. b) Desired Outcome: The desired outcome is local support for and understanding of agriculture in Maple Ridge. c) Interdepartmental Implications: Parks and Leisure services Staff would work with the staff supporting the Agricultural Advisory Committee to develop the fee for service agreement. Administration of the agreement would fall to the Agriculture Advisory Committee in the long term. d) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Council is aware that the grants budget has been extended in 2008 to cover this additional expense should Council choose to proceed. e) Alternatives: The alternative is to reduce the amount of funding requested to a total of $12,000 including the UBCM funding and the $1,600 available in cash from the festival grants program. That is not recommended since the UBCM funds are needed for a specific purpose beyond the Association's regular activities (a greater amount of regional advertising) and the festival grants funding is quite minimal. CONCLUSIONS: The Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association supports agriculture through the provision of educational activities including the annual country fair. The Fair has been a tradition in the community for over 100 years. The Association has requested funding to provide educational activities beyond what they have previously provided and to reach out to families. Other Fairs enjoy an even greater level of financial support from the Municipalities in which they are located. In light of this it is recommended that Council authorize staff to develop an appropriate multi year fee for service agreement with the group, similar to the agreements already in place with other organizations like the Historical Society, for the provision of a service the Municipality wishes to see available to its citizens and visitors. Mike Murray General Mana er Community Development, Parks and Recreation Approved by:Iu PauMjll General Lanager, C to & Finance Concurrence: f.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer MWM A1�U, ��•rrTT Maple Ridge —Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association ® P.O. Box 403, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 8K9 Ph:604-463-6922 Fax:604-463-6940 nctIcmarUxATassrcO�rr email: lorraine@mapleridgecountryfest.com April 08, 2008. �CC�GddGC7 M&C ZCA0 GM,.,; Maple Ridge Mayor and Coun District of Maple Ridge t h e r—C,, 0 Maple Ridge, B.C. Action: MAYOR Re: Sustainable funding for Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association Dear Mayor and Council, The Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association is writing to ask for your consideration of the following-. The agricultural association is the oldest operating organization in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows and the preservation of this event is perhaps the only way of also preserving our own agricultural history. With all of the many changes to the make-up of our community, the increased residential and the struggles to ensure that the public understands the importance of our agricultural capacity - our mandate of continuing education in this field is now more important than ever. The association directors and membership are amongst the most financially responsible organizations in the district and to date have demonstrated a remarkable ability to operate independently in a sustainable manner. While the association is extremely appreciative of the District's support through in -kind contributions, it should also be recognized that, in a history of some 107 years of operation, we have never asked for or received financial assistance. The fair association has always worked wonders with its small budget primarily because of the association's ability to attract and hold onto volunteers. This incredible volunteer base has kept the event going long after other similar events in other communities have had to ask for assistance. With the exception of a small annual honorarium for the manager the event is entirely volunteer driven (1,500 hrs were reported to Festivals in 2007 but is probably a low estimate). In spite of the fact that the Fair association is committed to seeking sponsorship from a variety of sources (and is committed to serious and ongoing efforts in that regard), the Association has now reached a point where our future depends on achieving sustained community funding -annual financial commitments from our local governments. By our calculations, the Fair association requires $15,000 in sustained funding to ensure the future success of this agricultural event. In keeping with the shared funding formula between Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows used by the Parks and Leisure Services Department, we are requesting that the District consider 80% of this figure (the remaining 20% to be requested from the City of Pitt Meadows.) This letter then is to formally request consideration of sustained funding for this important community event in the amount of $12,000/year to assist the association to achieve its mandate - the promotion and education of agriculture and agricultural activities to our citizens. This year, when we asked for assistance, our written proposal was directed through the festival budget which could not support our request. Although music will always provide an important ambience to our family oriented event, we are primarily an educational event as opposed to a music festival. It would seem that this one -of -a -kind event does not fit in with available categories and that is undoubtedly because the event, its mandate, and its contribution to a more sustainable community are entirely unique. We have collected some information from surrounding municipalities and their relationship and support of the importance of organizations that are promoting agriculture which may be helpful to the decision -making process. We would like to share with you that Abbotsford Agrifair receives $60,000 annually and will receive an additional $10,000 because the event this year falls on B.C. Day. This organization has been operating in the red for quite a few years but still is supported by the municipality. Chilliwack Exhibition for many years received $30,000 annually up to 2001, was reduced to V5,000 up to 2006.was then given $5,000 and has just announced (March 25th Chilliwack Times) that in 2008 they will receive $50,000 and $60,000 in 2009. The article also states that the General Manager of community development explained that this funding along with a $35,000 in an Agricultural Reserve Fund would allow the 2008 exhibition to break even, but $43,000 would have to be found for 2009. This organization is also in financial trouble but is still supported by Chilliwack council which again demonstrates the municipal commitment to the promotion of agriculture. I was advised by the President of Aldergrove Fair, which is a very small fair, that they are receiving a total of $12,500 ( cash and grants with the assistance of two councilor's who sit on their board) from the Township of Langley. A sustainable future for the citizens of Maple Ridge will hopefully include an event where the importance of agriculture is front and center. What better way to engage the public in learning about the benefits of agriculture than to help provide an attractive, entertaining, and productive event where they are invited to be engaged in actively promoting the benefits of agriculture and agricultural activities. The Fair Board's desire to create a sustainable education -based venue that promotes agriculture and agricultural activities fits well With the District's commitment to the environment and generally going green. Indeed, it may be events like the newly revitalized Fair (now christened Maple Ridge Country Fest) that will help lead people back to fully supporting activities that someday may mean the difference between eating or not. Sincerely, C�Sj- v� &66�, Lorraine Bates, Mgr Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Agricultural Association District of Maple Ridge AGRICULTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Agricultural Advisory Committee, held at Maple Ridge Municipal Hall, on Thursday, March 27, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT Councillor Linda King Councillor Ken Stewart Candace Gordon, Chair Matthew Laity Heather Laity Tim Wittenberg Christian Cowley, Vice -Chair Tony Pellett Margaret Daskis Kerry Davison Steve Pelton Andrea Lawseth . Lorraine Bates Steve Wynnyk Motion was moved and seconded Council Liaison, Maple Ridge Council Liaison, Maple Ridge Member at Large Food Producing Agricultural Sector Non -Food Producing Agricultural Sector Equestrian Community Representative Member at Large Agricultural Land Commission Maple Ridge Rep to the Metro Vancouver AAC Non -Food Producing Agricultural Sector Economic Advisory Commission Regional Agrologist, Ministry of Agriculture and Lands Agricultural Fair Board Food Producing Agricultural Sector That the Agricultural Advisory Committee supportthe request for funding for the Agricultural Fair Association CARRIED