Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-01-11 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA January 11, 2011 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber MEETING DECORUM Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be reprimanded. Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 MOMENT OF REFLECTION Rev. Katie Stein Sather, Beacon Unitarian Church 300 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS 400 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 500 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 501 Minutes of the'Regular Council Meeting of December 14, 2010 502 Minutes of the Public Hearing of December 14, 2010 503 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of November 3, 2010, December 3(2), 6(2), 10 and 20, 2010, January 4, 2011 Page 1 Council Meeting Agenda January 11, 2011 Page 2 of 6 600 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 601 "The Great British Columbia Shake Out" Earthquake Drill - C. Marlo, Manager of Legislative Services and Emergency Program 700 DELEGATIONS 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 900 CORRESPONDENCE 1000 BYLAWS Bylaws for Final Reading 1001 Maple Ridge Sewer Rate Amending Bylaw No. 6782-2010 To amend the Maple Ridge Sewer Rate Bylaw Final reading 1002 Maple Ridge Water Service Amending Bylaw No. 6783-2010 To amend the Maple Ridge Water Service Bylaw Final reading 1003 Maple Ridge Recycling Charges Amending Bylaw No. 6784-2010 To amend the Maple Ridge Recycling Charges Bylaw Final reading COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE 1100 Minutes - December 6, 2010 Council Meeting Agenda January 11, 2011 Page 3 of 6 The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting. Public Works and Development Services 1101 RZ/107/10, 23657 and 23651 132 Avenue, RS-3 and RS-2 to RM-1 and RS-1 Staff report dated December 22, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6779-2010 to allow for future development of townhouse units be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in Schedule A-F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1102 RZ/113/10, 12028; 12038 and 2048 222 Street, IRS-1 to RM-2 Staff report dated December 21, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6786-2010 to allow for future construction of a four -storey apartment building with approximately 86 units be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in Schedule A-H of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1103 RZ/119/10, 22388 124 Avenue and 12385 224 Street, RS-1 to RM-1 Staff report dated December 23, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6787-2010 to allow for future construction of 11 townhouse units be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in Schedule A-H of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1104 RZ/074/10, 11716 Burnett Street, RS-1 to R-1 Staff report dated December 30, 2010 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6785-2010 to allow for future subdivision be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in Schedule B of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879- 1999. Council Meeting Agenda January 11, 2011 Page 4 of 6 1105 RZ/091/10, 24371 112 Avenue, RS-3 to R-2 Staff report dated January 4, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6770-2010 to allow for future subdivision under a new R-2 zone for a minimum lot size of 315 m2 (3400 ft2) not be given first reading. 1106 DP/110/10, 11566 224 Street Staff report dated December 30, 2010 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/110/10 to permit a four -storey, 35 unit apartment building. Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police] 1131 Door-to-door Solicitation Staff report dated December 10, 2010 recommending the request of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of B.C. and Yukon for permission to canvass door-to-door for the month of February 2011 be approved. 1132 Disbursements for the month ended November 30, 2010 Staff report dated December 13, 2010 recommending that disbursements for the month of November, 2010 be approved. 1133 Adjustments to the 2010 Collector's Roll 1151 1181 Staff report dated December 22, 2010 submitting information on changes to the 2010 Collector's Roll through the issuance of Supplementary Roll 10. Community Development and Recreation Service Correspondence Other Committee Issues Council Meeting Agenda January 11, 2011 Page 5 of 6 1200 STAFF REPORTS 1201 Committees of Council Policy Staff report dated December 29, 2010 recommending that the Committees of Council Policy be adopted. 1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL 1400 MAYOR'S REPORT 1500 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS 1600 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 1700 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING 1800 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Council Meeting Agenda January 11, 2011 Page 6 of 6 1900 ADJOURNMENT QUESTION PERIOD The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes. Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the information required to provide a complete and accurate response. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings, delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca. Mayor and Council at ma orandcouncil@ma lerid e.ca. Checked b . 6 " - Date: CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE W1101/j0R.1 November 3, 2010 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary 1. DP/085/09 & DP/O48/O9 LEGAL: Lots 57-70 and 75-81 all of Section 32, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP44122, and Lots 100 - 107, all of Section 32, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP46218 LOCATION: 22956, 22962, 22968, 22778, 22980, 22986, 22988, 23100,23106, 23112, 23120,23126,23132, 23166, 23160, 23156, 23150, 23148, 23146, 23142, 23140 Gilbert Drive and 13789, 13785, 13871, 13777, 13773, 13769, 13765, 13761 23OA Street OWNER: Insignia Homes SilverValley Ltd. REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Exterior Finishes Covenant for RST lots THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO DP/085/09 & DP/O48/O9. CARRIED J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 503 VISTA RIDGE DRIVE N N N Go°' 38 Qs 1 36 37 aa� �a 2 oQ`J@i 2a9�8 3 ,ak'� 4 .aa9�o 5 Q s 6 ,tiq,`� 28 �a 7 a s 3Q a9s� a 31 a 32 �9�r 33 a� ►,"� 34 asy Q� 35 a �s 228r� a9�o 8 36 2z9 84 22gos 26 85 2 37 22y� Q 1 2905 86 110 38 ° 22916 87 r2 22go1 9 111 391 4 g p 11 F328 21 20 24 23 w2 o W 0 25 N o o (.0 w 26 LO -' si-O GILBERT DR. aa�s �a 0 81 82 jp 3 'b1 gs � Og 7 �49 0 _m 22910 88 13jgS 39 22906 89 112 13741 22897 90 11313735 40 22893 2a900 91 114 3731 41 � 22$ag 22ag6 92 115 3725 ❑ 22$9 93 116 N .15 31� g2�� 94 oa 43 a8 117z �5 9 13 A 22 I 118 3� \A a2a� 9b�r� 44 22$� _ 10 y 1191370_` _nL T�ea N SCALE 1:1,500 f District of Langley N 45 46 N47 N 48 N 49 CP 10328 19 1 18 � 17 I BCP1338 w w 1 N16 N15 � w• I o � 1 cn Cn C: 13761 - 13789 230A STREET I � i o CORPORATION OF I THE DISTRICT OF I RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE � PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Dec 21, 2010 FILE: DP/085/09 BY: PC R.� N o o, 0 F�RFMgN DRiVF CV N N CO O N N 0 00 O O 0) N N N N N N N IDGE DRIVE 40 41 42 43 44 N N 39 B P 1 328 � 38 37 � 23 22 21 ro 20 w 25 24 NN wo w 26 y e ` 7 L �j 28 �s� GILBERT DR a Cl) `p 1p. � 74 73 s ` 72 71 '1 75 BCP 41-71 6 99 28 78 7q 7 jo �0 100 ii� yu�. ��.ci W (0 v �0 81 82 r s 83 >Q 84 1 �8 '���or 85 e 109 0�S 110 7 111 a9 oQ' 13745 1 13741 1313735 14 13731 1111551 � cm N I,, O N W y N m O N 45 46 N 47 co co C\I 51 48 50 CP 10328 Rem 47 BC 63856 3 48 1-161, 2 1 1 9 10 51 11 N N j 00 Ln 52 19 18 17 BCP 338 13 w UA W W 1 N16 N15 N14 j �r 0 0 CID O Cn 1 1 w .c 01 SUBJECT PROPERTIES w N caj N ! Wy 0 co a) N j c1 56 55 O co C\j N C7 CY, 57 8N I BVP N N N I^c,,N O 60 6 BCP 44122 BCP 432 5 PARK BCS 3895 2 BCP 43237 4 Y PARK BCP 43235 Cii f Pitt , _j I Mea aws 22958 - 22988 & 23100 - 23166 GILBERT DRIVE - r l o CORPORATION OFTHE y L DISTRICT OF ,ly MAPLE RIDGE N District of U j Langley PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Dec 21, 2010 FILE: DP/048/09 BY: PC SCALE 1:1,500 `��F74RSER R_ CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES December 3, 2010 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. RZ/090/06 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 3, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP33244 13831232A Street Amarjit & Harjett Gill Modification of Section 219 Covenant BB564959 (No Build No Disturb) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO RZ/090/06. Chair CARRIED J.L. (Jim) le, Chief Administrative Officer Member Rem 46 13895 9 47 i3877 48 13871 49 13863 50 13859 9 51 13855 N W i CD C„ 52 13851 3C)5 � j'.pO5 54 53 BCP 41713 13795 F- N M N SILVER VALLEY RD 13; P 20132 Mea ows 13831 232A STREET A. �t CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF N r _o MAPLE RIDGE •'` , District of 'r I Ji 1 find PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley ! SCALE 1:1,500 ��: —{ ` �- � DATE: Nov 30, 2010 FILE: Untitled BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES December 3, 2010 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. SD/112/07 Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary LEGAL: Lot 29 Except: Part Subdivided by Plan BCP29017, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP17359 LOCATION: 13511 240 Street OWNER: Atlantic Pacific Land Corporation REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Subdivision Servicing Agreement (Municipal Works) Subdivision Servicing Agreement (Private Works) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO SD/112/07. CARRIED i J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer MembeFr rim N SCALE 1:2,500 9 64 LMP 35466• District of Pitt Meadows 1-7- --' District of Langley 8A 2623 PARK 6 SUBJECT PROPERTY BCP 17359 Rem 29 .M1 t] f3SQi PARK ^ C o l3503 a B V 13499 1 dgd A 28 13495 27 laasr 26 13471 U3 25 1348f 24 Law 13451 PARK `n 23 13441 22 13431 21 13421 y 20 e,' a r� \tZ \--, _L1.1 19 13511 240 STREET 0 y ! CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE r PLANNING DEPARTMENT �r' DATE: Dec 14, 2007 FILE: SD/112/07 BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES December 6, 2010 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman Frank Quinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. SD/103/08 Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary LEGAL: Section 4, Township 15, New Westminster District, Plan 13294 LOCATION: 28594 104 Avenue OWNER: Michael Whieldon REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Statutory Right -of -Way (Drainage) Covenants: Sewage Disposal; Geotechnical; Heritage Landscape Protection (Lots 1, 2, 3 & 4) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO SD/103/08. CARRIED A% � 2 Frank Q inn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member Appendix A IuiasRNll - yst;;ll r I 28594 104 AVENUE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Jun 1, 2009 FILE: DP/103/08 BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES December 6, 2010 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman Frank Quinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary 1. RZ/040/09 LEGAL: Lots 1 - 4, all of Section 3, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP41515 LOCATION: 24554 102 Avenue, 10175, 10125, 10075 & 10025 248t" Street OWNER: 666921 B.C. Ltd, 0710696 B.C. Ltd, and Braynor Financial Corp. REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Road Dedication Plan THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO RZ/040/09. Err3 e-Nykin, Mayor Chair CARRIED ■ • Frank uinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member BCP 23574 12 5 8 9 3 -�' MunitiPel >''v 6 grevN Pa 87 [ 10 9 8 BCP 7387 9 � 9 33 27 29 o> ' �5 L PAWL Rem N 1/2 of NE 1/4 8 ,02 AAVE. Section 3 Township 12 Mu ip lgravel ptl NWP 6502 N N 7 S Y C • a 5 4 3 2 BCP i 91 P 6579F 23/8 P 29247 P 9$5g torso 29 Provincial gravel PR } NWP 10788 Pd."K' O 2 P 1209 m ,61sc — BCP 41515 Rem 16 Nm C1 101]5 w SUBJECT PROPERTIES �g P 36818 BCP 33649 30 PARK 1.76 BCP 41515 +m: s P 1208 4 Rem 17 P 16340 8 9 P 16340 14 13 12 11 10 ! 16340 'c1AP W3 10025 P 33808 Rem 42 14 0 10025/75 & 10125/75 248 STREET i CORPORATION OF ! THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE ji PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' DATE: Dec 7, 2010 FILE: RZ/040/09 BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES December 10, 2010 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. SD/088/10 Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary LEGAL: Lot 1, Section 32, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 85759, Except Plan BCP30872 & BCP46734 LOCATION: 22600 136 Avenue OWNER: Formosa Plateau Developments Ltd. REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Subdivision Servicing Agreement - Parkette Planting Enhancement and Protection Agreement THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO SD/088/10. CARRIED Ernie Da in, ayor lber ) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Chair 24 125 N N � N 17 N 19 Rem SW 1/4� 20 FOREMAN DRIVE ,H„ F3 � 21 S 22 sfs1 1 23 ��'P rya 60 ZZti'�6 N 4 6 137 AVE as °s f i369i 4`s S P 85759 g 23 25 � 278E 13671 10 136G2 13661 39 P 709 Rem 1 11 22 40 13951 36 CT 12 3 2 1 t3W1 t3fi4221 d 41 13543 U 13 20 'O Subject Property ,3631 632 ti 42 14 3asa 19 � N 1ZE2' 13622 m 43 15 362.3 0 18 13611 44 e i t3601 13602 ,3B,3 16 3C�3 17 45 136 AV E m 136 AVE 0 P 93 7 city f Pitt Mea5OWS_ 22600-136 Ave CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF 4J--io _.� MAPLE RIDGE N Y _ District of = r _i I r Langley -�_ _ --- _ - ( PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,500 —� DATE: Sep 29, 2010 SD/088/10 BY: JV FRASE q R, -- CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES December 20, 2010 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. SD/096/08 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lots 2 - 11, all of Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP42732 23921 1301h Avenue, 13005. 13013, 13021, 13029, 13037, 13045, 13053, 13061 & 13067 239B Street 668288 B.C. Ltd (Joao Da Costa) Infiltration Restrictive Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SD/096/08. Ern' Pain, Mayor air CARRIED J.L. (Jiri) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 12175 9 ❑ 13178 13181 8 07 14 36 a- 21 16 13178 7 13166 13165 13168 07 13171 7 a 15 BCP 19418 35 13166 cc3157 P 2637 22 13155 13158 15 13161 6 16 07 34 23 14 13156 m 13147 PARK p�j 13145 13148 131s1 5 a 17 = 131aa 131 ~ 7 24 13 4 13129 2 t3138 13141 L) 18 013128 25 "13112'SEi 12 3 193126 13131 26 11 2 20 13118 13121 21 t3116IP 27 10 1 0� -, 13111 13106 PARIH SUBJECT PROPERTIES 9 13101 BCP24019' 29 8 — — 13088 13091 1 30 ✓ 7 13080 13078 13061 2 54 P 11147 31 B 13072 11 m 13068 3071 3 _ 13086 13067 <v BCP 9418 13062 13085 22 1 2 3 4 5 q 55 10 13061 & nF 13056 Q BCP42361 9 130AAVE. 5 13060 13050 13053 Park 13055 F 56 8 13045 T 7 13037 13040 4 6 13029 57 13025 m 5 13021 N 13020 0.. 4 13013 1 58 2 13006 3 m 13006 H Park BCP 36962 130 AVE. 12954 N m P 3908 S 33 N `LMP 22960 R N 7417 N 31 32 2 3 4 N 2 25 N 3 4 P 390 5 1 Rem 3 N w P 13634 24 a�. P 7P 94 P 250 94 B m A (P 7417) d .0) 4 12933 209 n P 10335 P 103 23g71 C r 7 d 46 fi 1 5 ry��oh Meanows �r ' { . ! LOTS 2 - 11, PLAN BCP42732 J1 1.2 CORPORATION OF L ! THE DISTRICT OF N MAPLE RIDGE r District of � `� t Langley I PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,500 DATE: Dec 20, 2010 FILE: SD/096/08 BY: PC USER 17. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES January 4, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. SD/115/08 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 4, Section 32, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP43237 13819 232 Street Insignia Homes Brighton Ltd Subdivision Strata Plan - Phase 4 THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SD/115/08. J.L. (Jirn) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 139 AVE �~ rt' X IU , r �'< oa�G II ��H pN OvIIIARIC)GE DRIVE 38 37 �2 p890 BCP 43237 PT 2 s y $ 7 6 5 rp Rem 45 A 13895 �'DRFq�4N n Dq+y� i Rem 47 � c. 3 aa n VC 18856 48 13871 ti 40 41N 42 43 44 1 39 13 •P 1 328 45 46 47 48 49 ,350 51 49 i3863 P 1 328 8 50 QW1 10 51 Ln-15 71 v 12 r 52 3R41 21 2 18 1B 17 BCP 338 13. �r 24 23 2 2 " 4i 16 %15 ti14 25 v o S i RP 17267 1 L- 8GP 33244 13771 P 19849 13 2 r,11a5 3 13g.71 t 1. 4 rya• �7A05 13R 13702 11'"2 1375� � 13162 1 SILVER VALLEY RD City of Pitt Meadows ; 13819 232 STREET r— o CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF L` _ "°:_ i� - MAPLE RIDGE N District of,:; Langley l i I PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,500 FgASEq q. DATE: Jun 3, 2010 FILE: SD/11908 BY: KK DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6782-2010 A Bylaw to further amend Maple Ridge Sewer Rate Bylaw No. 718-1964 WHEREAS the Council has by bylaw imposed charges against the owners of real property for the provision and maintenance of the sanitary sewer system and wishes to amend those charges for all uses; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to further amend Maple Ridge Sewer Rate Bylaw No. 718- 1964 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Sewer Rate Amending Bylaw No. 6782-2010". 2. That the part entitled "Residential", "Commercial" and "Industrial" in Section 3 of Maple Ridge Sewer Rate Bylaw No. 718-1964 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: RESIDENTIAL Single Family Residential $249.90 per dwelling unit Detached Garden Suite $249.90 per dwelling unit Duplex $249.90 per dwelling unit Triplex $249.90 per dwelling unit Apartment $249.90 per dwelling unit Townhouse $249.90 per dwelling unit Mobile Home $249.90 per dwelling unit Boarding House, $249.90 per dwelling unit Including Rest Homes $65.10 for each boarder or roomer kept in excess of two (2) boarders or roomers COMMERCIAL Each Hall $249.90 Each Theatre $249.90 Each Church $249.90 Each Store $249.90 Each Office $249.90 Each Shop $249.90 Each Barber Shop $249.90 U111111 Bylaw No. 6782-2010 Page 2 COMMERCIAL (cont'd) Each Beauty Shop Each Restaurant Each School Each Hospital Each Motel or Hotel Each Beverage Room Each Laundry Each Dry Cleaner Each Laundromat INDUSTRIAL All Industrial Uses $249.90 $249.90 up to 10 seats $25.75 for each additional seat $180.80 per classroom $180.80 per bed $249.90 first room $65.65 for each additional room $249.90 up to 10 seats $25.75 for each additional seat $411.60 $249.90 $249.90 minimum $65.65 per machine The charge shall be 60.41% of the metered charge as established for the subject parcel by Maple Ridge Water Service Bylaw No. 6002-2001 (as amended) except, however, if the said parcel is not metered, then the rate for each industrial user connected to the sanitary sewer shall be the same as the flat rate of $249.90 READ a first time the 14th day of December, 210. READ a second time the 141h day of December, 210. READ a third time the 141h day of December, 210. RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of 20. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6783-2010 A Bylaw to further amend Maple Ridge Water Service Bylaw No. 6002-2001 WHEREAS the Council has by bylaw imposed charges against the owners of real property for the provision and maintenance of the water system and wishes to amend those charges for all uses; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to further amend Maple Ridge Water Service Bylaw No. 6002-2001 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Water Service Amending Bylaw No. 6783-2010". 2. That Schedules "A" ,"B" and "G" be deleted in their entirety and Schedules "A" ,"B" and "G" attached hereto be substituted thereto. READ a first time the 14th day of December, 2010. READ a second time the 14th day of December, 2010. READ a third time the 14th day of December, 2010. RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of 12010. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Attachment: Schedules "A", "B" & "G" 1002 District of Maple Ridge Maple Ridge Water Service Bylaw No. 6002-2001 SCHEDULE "A" Flat Rate Charges 6783-2010 (Annual Rates) USE RATE A. Residential (1) Per Single Family Dwelling Unit in the General Water $ 413.65 Supply Area (2) Per Additional Dwelling Unit located within the structure $ 206.85 of a Single Family Dwelling Unit (3) Per Additional Dwelling Unit or Detached Garden Suite $ 206.85 located on the same parcel as the Single Family Dwelling Unit (4) Per Multiple Dwelling Unit $ 392.65 (5) Per Dwelling Unit in the Rothsay Water Supply Area $357.00 (Schedule "E") until (and including) the year 2014, in addition to the residential rate set in Section A (1) of this Schedule (6) Per Dwelling Unit in the Garibaldi Water Supply Area $357.00 (Schedule "F") until (and including) the year 2015, in addition to the residential rate set in Section A (1) of this Schedule B. Industrial, Commercial and Institutional (1) Per Unit $ 413.65 District of Maple Ridge Maple Ridge Water Service Bylaw No. 6002-2001 SCHEDULE "B" Metered Charges 6783-2010 (Quarter Year Rates) USE RATE A. All Uses (1) Water consumption charges for metered services per $ 0.7094 cubic meter (m3) (2) Base rate levied per quarter year based on service connection size: Connection Size Rate per quarter 25 mm or less $31.85 40 mm $46.70 50 mm $75.00 75 mm $140.15 100 mm $196.30 150 mm $289.80 200 mm $392.65 250 mm $570.30 District of Maple Ridge Maple Ridge Water Service Bylaw No. 6002-2001 SCHEDULE"G" Parcel Tax Charges 6783-2010 (Annual Rates) USE A. All Uses RATE (1) For each parcel of land that is not serviced with a $ 92.30 municipal water service as defined in this bylaw and is fronting or partially fronting a municipal water main DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6784-2010 A Bylaw to further amend Maple Ridge Recycling Charges Bylaw No. 4655-1992 WHEREAS the Council has by bylaw imposed charges against the owners of real property to fund recycling programs and wishes to amend those charges for all uses; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to further amend Maple Ridge Recycling Charges Bylaw No. 4655-1992 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Recycling Charges Amending Bylaw No. 6784-2010". 2. That Section 4 is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: "4. The annual recycling charge will be in the amount of Thirty Dollars and Seventy-eight Cents ($31.70) per taxable property. If services to properties commence part way through the year, the charges will be pro -rated for the portion of the year that the services are provided." 3. That Section 6 is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: "6. The amount of the annual curbside collection charge will be as follows: Single Family Residential Detached Garden Suite Duplex Triplex Townhouse Boarding House (Including Rest Homes) Condominiums Apartment $32.60 per dwelling unit $32.60 per dwelling unit $32.60 per dwelling unit $32.60 per dwelling unit $32.60 per dwelling unit $32.60 per dwelling unit $32.35 per dwelling unit $32.35 per dwelling unit If services to properties commence part way through the year, the charges will be pro -rated for the portion of the year that the services are provided." READ a first time the 14th day of December, 2010. READ a second time the 14th day of December, 2010. READ a third time the 14th day of December, 210. RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of 20. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1003 Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: December 22, 2010 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/107/10 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6779-2010 23657 and 23651132 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and RS- 1 (One Family Urban Residential) zones. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. This application is in compliance with the Silver Valley Area Plan of the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; That Zone Amending Bylaw No.6779-2010 be given First Reading; and That the applicant provides all the information as described on Schedule A - F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999, before proceeding further. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Michael Karton Owner: Michael Karton 1101 Legal Description: Lot: A, Section: 28, Township: 12, Plan: 23796; Lot: B, Section 28, Township: 12, Plan 23796; OCP: Existing: Med/High Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Proposed: RM-1(Townhouse Residential) and RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-1(Residential District) zone Designation: Med/ High Density Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Conservation, Low Density Residential and Med/ High Density Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Conservation, Low Density Residential, Open Space, Neighbourhood Park and Med/ High Density Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential & Proposed Multi -Family Residential (townhouses) Zone: RM-1(Townhouse Residential) Designation: Med/ High Density Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Multi -Family Residential (Townhouses) and Single Family Residential Site Area: 1.97 Hectares (4.88 acres). Access: 133rd Avenue and 132nd Avenue Servicing requirement: Full Urban b) Site Characteristics & Project Description: The site consisting of two legal lots, approximately 4.88 acres in size will require consolidation and subdivision. The applicant is requesting to rezone the entire property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to permit the future development of townhouse units on a strata lot and one RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zoned lot. The exact number of townhouse units will be determined only after all the pending information; applications and reports are submitted between the 1st and 2nd reading. At this time the current application has been assessed simply to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and land use. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. The applicant's proposed site plan is very preliminary and lacks the necessary details to assess the proposal properly. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment will -2- impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site consists of two legal lots within the Silver Valley Area Plan which forms part of the Official Community Plan. The subject properties are located just outside of the 400m defined "River Village" hamlet boundary which is intended to be the main Commercial centre in the Silver Valley Area Plan. The two lots under consideration need to be consolidated and re -subdivided; the southern property is designated "Conservation, Open Space and Medium/High Density Residential" while the northern property is designated "Medium/High Density Residential". The RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone correlates with the medium/high density residential designation and also provides a transition in density between the single family development to the north, to the more dense developments intended within the River Hamlet centre. The southern property is impacted by a tributary of the Maple Ridge Park Creek around which environmentally sensitive area must be protected through re -vegetation and park dedication. Currently a log house sits on the southern property within the required 15.0 metre environmental setback area. This part is proposed to be zoned RS-1 (One family Urban Residential). An Official Community Plan Amendment will be required to adjust the conservation boundary. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 23657 and 23651 132 Avenue from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit future construction of townhouse units and the remainder as RS- 1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone. The proposed RM-1 zone (Townhouse Residential District) is intended for low to medium density townhouses and multi family residential buildings. A maximum density of 0.6 times the net lot area is permitted along with a 50 m2 basement area per unit. This zone requires a minimum usable space of 45 m2 for each three -bedroom and 30 m2 for each two - bedroom unit. This zone also requires a Common Activity area of minimum 5 m2 per unit. The RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone specifies the following setbacks: 7.5 metres from front, rear and exterior side yard; 4.5 metres from an interior side yard for a wall with no windows to a habitable room and 6.0 metres from an interior side yard for a wall with a balcony or a window to a habitable room. Maximum permitted height in this zone must not exceed 10.5 metres or 2.5 storeys. Any variations from the height and setback requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. The proposed RS-1 zone (One Family Urban Residential) requires a minimum lot size of 668 m2 and permits a maximum lot coverage of 40% of the lot area. The RS-1 zone (One Family Urban Residential) permits a maximum height of 11.0 metres; a minimum front and rear yard setback of 7.5 metres, a minimum exterior side yard setback of 4.5 metres and a minimum interior side yard setback of 1.5 metres. Any variations from the height and setback requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan, a Multi -Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with -3- compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is.required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top of bank of all watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Advisory Design Panel: A Multi -Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to Second Reading of this proposal. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. d) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Parks Department; e) Building Department; f) School District; g) Ministry of Transportation; and h) Ministry of Environment The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to any of the departments or agencies stated above, at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing and other requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between 1st and 2nd Reading. e) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedural Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A); 2. Multi -Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D); 3. Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); 4. Subdivision Application as per the Checklist. ME The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The proposed land use is in compliance with the land use designation of the Silver Valley Area Plan, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. It is expected that once complete information is received, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6779-2010 may be amended and an Official Community Plan Amendment for conservation boundary adjustment may be required. In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. It is, therefore recommended that Council not require any additional consultation. The proposed layout found in Appendix C is lacking in sufficient details to understand the nature of the development. Thus it has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing development or subdivision provisions. Any development or subdivision layout suggested by Schedule "C" is strictly preliminary. No conclusion of approval for the development, or the Approving Officer's acceptance of subdivision can be drawn from this analysis. UO%&. Prepared by: Rasika A arya, B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED® AP Prapner II 3"', 'A Apgrove� �anepieji�wg, MCP, MCIP ��r of Planning /W �4z Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P_.Eng GM: Public Works & Dbvelopment Services Concurrence: RA/dp J. L.;{]im) Ru% Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6779-2010 Appendix C - Preliminary layout WE RP 1804A Rem. Pd. 0 13245 39 Appendix A 60 23 9 18 er 24 8 �7 o bye 25 ry� 7 1ry 5 13325 2� e9`9 26 ry' g �y 10 14 a, 17 + oy y A27 1 6 3(7 4 1932i 13322 p m 16E� 31 15 29 ry 41m 13317 45 .42.1 3 16 0. 15 A6`°0 ry 1° 237a1 1.3NP 30 3 14 13 `L ti�b^ 12 ti 23-�8 2 5 7 a 133117 31 237g2 23743 13309 13310 1 2 3 8 9 0 TT 23687 2 1 a g 18 23691 32 237a5 13805 13306 21 22 o w n a � � �. 237a6 23747 5 �n 19 R 3 4 13301 M 20 N SUBJECT PROPERTIES 10�PA 1 13292 1 13295 11 13282 2 12 m w 9 13275 13276 1` n 21 3 13 o P 8925 `l 13268 U 6 1326' m a 14 8 P 47603 m 4 < 13260 32s7 N 15 13250 ti 5 13251 13260 n 23 24 132 A AVE 6 16 16 w 13238 c 13235 17 35 P 47 03 N 7 13230 SCF _n A 13225 IL 13227 18 2 o_ 8 U � 22 20 co13215 13220 d 13215 19 Q 34 9 a P P 157::13205 13210 P 2637 Rem 1 'A' 165 ' /P7404 P 2637 r 13160 4 P 1105 6 H, 13144 +l7 - �-- C!t t Pitt i Mea vws 23651/57 132 AVENUE T 7 * CORPORATION OF �'-Q THE DISTRICT OF N ❑istriotof = �' -_ _!_ _. J. rMAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE Langloy 41 �wrJ PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,500 - DATE: Nov 25, 2010 FILE:RZ/107/10 BY: PC ERASER F1�= Appendix B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6779-2010 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6779-2010." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot A Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 23796 Lot B Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 23796 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1501 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-1(Townhouse Residential) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER RP 1804A Rem. Pd. C 6Pc "N � 1 a ti� 50 1'Ta 17 16 ti� eti N 15 ro 30 3 M1 6 a3e a SCP 29630 1 14 1 3 B31 12 31 ' 742 23687 1 27 3_ 5 6 7 8 9 0,1 32 1_ 2 23691 N $ 23746 n2 97 33 1 LMP 35468 133 AVE. cn IL J 13245 39 w w N 35 N 13227 [7 6_ 13215 34 'PP157 LMP 38113 C, 13165 P 2637 Rem 1 EP 13725 A P 2637 10 14 13322 m Y 4 13321 I 9 m 23191 ti n 15 44 4 I13317 13318 a 3 N 8 a 16 g 23741 w 13313 13314 2 7 17 .n 13309 13310 18 co 23743 _ 21 22 J 13.305 5 13306 23745 23747 3 ry 20 ,4 13301 10 13292 1 11 13282 12 13276 n rn rn 13 a a 3268 M m 14 a 13260 a 15 N 13250 132 A AVE. 16 m 1 13238 17 13230 n 18 U m 13220 Y 19 cr a Q 13210 LMP 7404 .A"i 1 lI I 13160 - 4 I MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6779-2010 Map No. 1501 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) To: 0 RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) ® RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) MAPLE RIDGE N SCALE 1:2,500 Appendix C (-,] (n kj,-� I- Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: December 21, 2010 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/113/10 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6786 -2010 12028; 12038 and 12048 222 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone to allow future construction of a four -storey apartment building with approximately 86 units. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. This proposal may be eligible for the Town Centre incentive program and will be assessed for its compliance with that program. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6786-2010 be given First Reading; and; That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule (A-H) of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: Colin A. Hogan of Focus Architecture Inc. 0724674 BC LTD Lot: 3, D.L.: 399, Block: 6, Plan: 9669; PID: 002-036-690 Lot: 4, D.L.: 399, Plan: 9669; PID: 011-425-253 Lot: A, D.L.: 399, Plan: LMP 8411; PID: 018-066-496 Commercial RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) North: Use: Proposed Supportive Housing apartment building & Brown Avenue Zone: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) Designation: Low Rise Apartment 1102 South: Use: Commercial Zone: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Designation: Town Centre Commercial East: Use: Commercial and Plaza Street Zone: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Designation: Town Centre Commercial West: Use: Single Family Residential; Commercial and 222nd Street Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) and C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Designation: Town Centre Commercial Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site and Project Description: Single Family Residential Multi -Family Residential (Apartment) 0.92 acres (3729.99 mz). Plaza Street Full Urban The subject site consists of three legal parcels, south of Brown Avenue, east of 222nd Street and west of Plaza Street i.e. in the south-east corner of 222nd Street and Brown Avenue within the Central Business District of the Town Centre Area. The 3 parcels will require consolidation prior to final reading. A four storey, wood -frame apartment building with approximately 86 units has been proposed with underground parking. The main access and vehicular access to the underground parkade is from Plaza Street. The proposed floor space ratio is 1.4 with 90 residential parking stalls in the under- ground parkade and 9 at grade parking stalls. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries, number of units, maximum density, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject site, located within the central business district, is designated "Town Centre Commercial" as per the Town Centre Area Plan which aligns well with the proposed apartment use and the proposed zone as it is outside "Schedule G" of the Zoning Bylaw. This means that although designated "Town Centre Commercial" a ground -floor commercial use is not required and hence a Multi -Family Residential use is permitted in this designation as per policy 3-30 of the Official Community Plan which states "Multi -Family Residential use is permitted as a principle use in the Town Centre Commercial designation, except where identified on Schedule "G" as "Ground Floor Commercial Required" in the Maple Ridge Zoning bylaw, where ground floor use is to be commercial". Appendix A "Zoning Matrix for the Town Centre Area" states under the Town Centre -2- Commercial Zone "Properties designated Town Centre Commercial and not identified as Ground Floor Commercial Required on Schedule "G" of the Zoning Bylaw 3510-1985 may align with zones within the Low -Rise Apartment and Medium and High -Rise Apartment land use category of this Matrix and in compliance with the Town Centre Area Plan. The proposed zone RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) is supported under the Low -Rise Apartment designation. This application is in compliance with the Town Centre Area Plan designation of the Official Community Plan. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 12028, 12038 and 12048 222 Street from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit future construction of a four -storey apartment building with approximately 86 units. The proposed RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) zone is intended for low to medium density apartment use and permits a maximum floor space ratio of 1.8 times the consolidated net lot area. The usable open space required in this zone is 20% of the consolidated net lot area and the required common activity area in this zone is 1 m2 per unit. The maximum height permitted in this zone must not exceed 15 meters and 4 storeys. The permitted minimum setback from all property lines for this zone is 7.5 meters. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. It is anticipated that some variances may be requested for the proposed use. These will be discussed in a future report for Council consideration. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.11 of the Official Community Plan, a Town Centre Development Permit application is required for all multifamily residential, flexible mixed use and commercial development located in the Town Centre. Council will review a Development Permit report at a later date. Advisory Design Panel: A Town Centre Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to Second Reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. d) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; -3- e) Parks Department; f) Utility companies; g) School District; and h) Ministry of Transportation; The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has been forwarded to the Engineering & Operations Department for comments which are summarized below: • All required off -site services do not exist and will need to be provided by the Rezoning Servicing Agreement; • Road dedication of 2.5 meters will be required across the full frontage on Plaza Street to upgrade it to a collector standard. Road widths on 222nd Street and Brown Avenue do not need further widening; • Other upgrades include the following: 1. New curb, gutter on the west side of Plaza Street; reconstruction of the curb at the intersection of Plaza street and Brown Avenue; removal of unneeded driveway let downs on 222nd Street & replacing it with separated sidewalk; 2. New sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer connections; separated sidewalks on Plaza Street and Brown Avenue; 3. Street lighting on Plaza Street and 222nd Street (existing Street lights on Brown Avenue are adequate); 4. Street Trees on boulevard on all three frontages; 5. Under -ground wiring for utility services to be under -ground. This application has been forwarded to the Building and Fire Departments for comments and most of these are to be addressed prior to issuance of a Development Permit and a Building Permit. e) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); 2. A Town Centre Development Permit Application; 3. Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. 111112"! CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. It is expected that once complete information is received, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6786-2010 may be amended. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge's Approving Officer. �kA Prepared by: Rasika charya, B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEEDO AP Planner Approv�ed�by: Jane Pick ,-MOP, MCIP �� Dir�cvrof Planning -912'- '70( Approved)'y. Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Devrplopment Services Concurrence., 11L. (Jim) Rutie Chief Administrative Officer RA/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6786 - 2010 Appendix C- Preliminary Site Plan -5- 12i98 2 �2i - 11 0 274 99 3 _� T 12129 12120 4 U) 10 a 273 Z B" 100 12123 12112 5 (P 9669) 6 7 8 g 272 280 12119 12128 12106 P 1 997 NWS 133 281 a 0) o Q m P 0 F r M 12096 N a N N 12111 N N 103 / 121 AVE. "A" 12086 ! (P 38752) V% N O Op 12096 M 104 N N N 0 12080 K L M N 105 P 16917 12075 SUBJECT f 12070 P 16997 106 3 I H G 12060 a n N N N 12061 IL 107 12048 CHURCH AVE. A Q048 LMP 8411 rn 108 N F 4 CD m 12032 2038 0 E 109 m P 14898 1- 12035 3 a m _� 12026 M C 12026 [v a Cl- P 9669 D 110 2 1 N A t2 O O O N N N N N N N N N N 4 DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. co M m N N N N „A" 1 A P 70168 C P 3175 NWS 2870 BCP 22636 NWS 3374 11980 BCS 2391 P 3175 P 84262 Appendix A -12127 a 16 12117 17 LMP 27702 IIII E 1 12097 18 N LO a M N N m N 19 N N N 12087 LMP 27701 BROWN AVE. 'IES 12061 Rem 8 P 20094 55 LO r- M LO a P 20094 12051 9 2002112 7 50 P 20094 LO N P 20094 m v m EL iI1 N-LMP2967EP,' 10 m W N N N RP 59105 W N 1!2 1!2 T Rem = ry N E E N N m 2 N12 11 E N N N P 8978 N P 632 N P 3216 NWS 3233 N 'LMP4261 Pd. 121 13 ctil 11968 11963 1 11960 1 1 11957 BCP 28220 N H 11924 a o 11941 -_ _�� IliAA _ _ +cart■ 57 _ _ _n 9 M C€ly..Qf Pitt , y 11 I Meadows 12028/38/48 222 STREET w ,co o CORPORATION OF _� THE DISTRICT OF 1Jo MAPLE RIDGE N District of '� ` -� -I I r - r-- PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley l SCALE 1:2,000 T '- ^ 1 DATE: Nov 30, 2010 FILE:RZ/113/10 BY: PC FRASER Appendix B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6786-2010 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6786-2010." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 9669 Lot 4 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 9669 Lot A District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan LMP8411 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1503, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 98 a 12138 2 12 �y 12139 11 0 274 99 3 co T 1z1zs v 12120 4 cn 10 273 cL 100 Z �272 11g11 W 12112 5 (P 9669) It 6 7 8280 I i 12128 12106 11 N P 1 997co � NWS 133 281 I m ' co o o Q rn P O _ r c7 Qcn to 1209E II N 1L N N 12111 N N 103 121 AVE. „A„ EP 30259 12086 (P 38752) 12oss m 104 N N N BCP 15939 0 12080 L M N FC P 169 LMP 12218 105 12075 1 12070 w P 169 37 106 J I H n G 12060 cp YU N N N 12061 a 14 Rem 12131 G 15 P 10689 LO r 12127 a 16 12117 LMP 27702 17 1 12097 18 n1 cn n a N N 19 N N N 12087 LMP 27701 BROWN AVE. ..a 107 12048 CHURCH AVE. A P 20094 a ----- �— -- --- _ 1204E LMP 8411 12051 — — — — — — — 1 108 F� N 4 m 12032-----�i +.2038 9 20OV 12 109 P 14C898 E 12035 3 so 1 12026 P 20094 cm a � � a. P 9 w Ln N 110 M I q- N Q 2 1 n A a P 20094co a N w N N N a of � 10 'LMP296711 N [ EWDNEY TRUNK RD. EP 54063 EP 49989 W RP 59105 O N N N N N 1 1/2 11 2 Q N T Rem N 2 N N N N N o—E T 1 N a1 N O12 11 m B G 1 A P 3175 P 0168 NWS 2870 Tp E r a) w N P 632 N N¢ P 8978 co P 32 fi N NWS 3374 . NWS 3233 N MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6786-2010 Map No. 1503 From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) N SCALE 1:2,000 r ❑ i Z � 0 90L ILOcc � rr. O IL z. $a9�1 M a 7 3p O LL g'x x s � � w i LU i a J p F i>J669 ZW Fo ❑W a �' 0 2 ----------- -- F _ {1 uiah.966z9 I s I I PT avaa MNmu- Amamm im 7 a 2 o€ a z e Y' � V p �g� e. SE o-__ oggo pgR yyS 1;- i 1 o e a a ajg �- LL yea >RW URg N -- Appendix C Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: December 23, 2010 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/119/10 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6787-2010 22388 124 AVENUE and 12385 224 STREET EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit future construction of 11 townhouse units. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; III. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; That Zone Amending Bylaw No.6787-2010 be given First Reading; and; That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule (A-H) of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: BRIAN SHIGETOMI of ATELIER ARCHITECTURE INC Owner: POLSTAR HOLDINGS LTD Legal Description: Lot: 1, D.L.: 399, Plan: 19826; PID: 004-803-060 Lot: 2, D.L.: 399, Plan: 19826; PID: 004-803-078 1103 OCP: Zoning: Existing: Ground -Oriented Multi -Family Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: RM-1(Townhouse Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential and 1241h Avenue Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban Residential -Medium Density) Designation: Residential South: Use: Multi -Family Residential (recently approved stacked townhouses) Zone: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment) Designation: Ground -oriented Multi -Family residential East: Use: Single Family Residential and 224th Street Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Ground -oriented Multi -Family residential West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site and Project Description: Single Family Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Conservation Single Family Residential Multi -Family Residential (townhouses) 2024.99 m2 124th Avenue Full Urban The subject site consisting of two legal lots, located on the northern periphery of the Town Centre Area is fairly flat. The corner lot had an older house that has been demolished. Consolidation of the properties will be required as a condition of final reading on the rezoning. The south-east corner of the subject site is impacted by a tributary of Morse Creek, which requires an environmental setback of 15 metres from the top of bank. The proposal shows 11 townhouse units with main access from 124th Avenue and an emergency access only from 224th Street. Each unit is proposed with a two car -tandem parking garage that is accessed from the internal strata road. A total of 22 residential parking stalls and 3 visitor parking stalls have been proposed as required by the proposed zone. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. -2- c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject site falls within the North View precinct of the Town Centre Area and designated "Ground -Oriented Multi -Family" as per the Town Centre Area Plan of the Official Community Plan. This designation is intended to provide housing options that range from a low density attached form to a medium -high density attached form of ground -oriented housing that will generally be a maximum of three storeys high with ground level access to each unit. Policy 3-19 of the Official Community Plan, under this designation states "Townhouse development typically includes an internal private street for vehicle access to each unit. All townhouse form of development should include the following characteristics: a. A site size and configuration that allows for two or more units to face directly onto the street; and b. Residential parking is provided in a ground level concealed structure or underground structure". The proposal meets both the above mentioned criteria as at least 5 units in Block 1 face 124th Avenue directly and each proposed unit has a concealed, at grade tandem parking garage (Appendix C). This is an area in transition and the proposal is in compliance with the Town Centre Area Plan designation. However, the south-east corner of the subject site is impacted by a tributary of Morse Creek hence it is anticipated that an Official Community Plan amendment will be required, to adjust the conservation boundary. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 22388 124 Avenue and 12385 224 Street from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit future construction of 11 townhouse units. The proposed RM-1 zone (Townhouse Residential District) is intended for low to medium density townhouses and multi family residential buildings. A maximum density of 0.6 times the net lot area is permitted along with a 50 m2 basement area per unit. This zone requires a minimum usable space of 45 m2 for each three -bedroom and 30 m2 for each two -bedroom unit. This zone also requires a Common Activity area of minimum 5 m2 per unit. The RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone specifies the following setbacks: 7.5 metres from front, rear and exterior side yard; 4.5 metres from an interior side yard for a wall with no windows to a habitable room and 6.0 metres from an interior side yard for a wall with a balcony or a window to a habitable room. Maximum permitted height in this zone must not exceed 10.5 metres or 2.5 storeys. Any variations from the height and setback requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. It is anticipated that some variances will be requested for this proposal. A Development Variance Permit application will be required and we anticipate that this evaluation will take place between 1st and 2nd Reading. Develo ment Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.11 of the Official Community Plan, a Town Centre Development Permit application is required for all Multi -Family residential, flexible mixed use and commercial development located in the Town Centre. Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top -3- of bank of all watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Advisory Design Panel: A Town Centre Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to Second Reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is not required for this application in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. d) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) School District; f) Utility companies; and g) Ministry of Environment The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between 1st and 2nd Reading. e) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: (choose) 1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B or Schedule C); 3. Town Centre Development Permit Application; 4. Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); 5. Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. M CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the Town Centre Area Plan of the Official Community Plan, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. It is expected that once complete information is received, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6787-2010 will be amended and an Official Community Plan Amendment for Conservation boundary adjustment will be required. In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. It is, therefore recommended that Council not require any additional consultation. The proposed layout (Appendix C) has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge's Approving Officer. ""4 Prepared by: Rasika AC rya, B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED® AP PI ner II � J App ved b ,arse Ec e , MCP, MCIP C ti Approved by. Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM ublic W ks & Developynent Services Concurrence: J. L/ (Jim) Rule . Chief Administrative Officer RA/d p The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6787-2010 Appendix C- Preliminary Site Plan -5- 12461 ----� _--- 21 0 P 74108 7 12462 12485 c " PP 126 I-= 1 � d 12 w rr 20 LMS 631 6 12455 12457 w 12450 11 -j 12445 19 cli 4 12445 CD 12435 12438 Q' 3 10 12425 12433 18 2 12430 12415 1 17 12405 p 1 12422 P 7z 108 p' 3 4 u) 16 12421 N N N Appendix A STRENG AV 2440 0 IN co 73 74 ry Lr I.? P 24946 N 100 N101 P 25 14 NWS 2652 1 P 70062 i Subject Properties N O 00 cot � Lco N N N N Rem 1 12396 N N N N 2 Rem Rem 4 Rem 3 P 18957 5 P 1 a 26 2 P 12385 154 P 38983 PA R K A 12386 R BCP 46508 67 12367 P 24278 N 1� 0P 1477 12344 2 1234 2342 12345 P 8914 NWS 2464 1 S 1 /2 C 2069 P 7 12333 12334 N 1 42 N _ _ _ 12325 43 A City --Of Pitt ~ i Meadows j l M. 12385-224 St/22388-124 Ave CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE N District of — Langley T . _ _ I PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:1,500 J i =— DATE: Dec 14. 2010 RZ/119/10 BY: Jb FRASER Appendix B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. No 6787-2010 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6787-2010". 2. Those parcel (s) or tract (s) of land and premises known and described as: Lot: 1, D.L.: 399, Plan: 19826 and Lot: 2, D.L.: 399, Plan: 19826 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1504 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-1(Townhouse Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of READ a second time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the PRESIDING MEMBER ,A.D. 20 . ,A.D. 20 . ,A.D. 20 . ,A.D. 20 . day of , A.D. 20 . day of , A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER 14 : iu 1 n 2 3 4 N 5 N 6 h N 8 9 N N \ 36 12a77 22 ,aa83 P 7 494 10 11 D- 12472 ti 8 P 777 P 258 F 1247E 13 v RW 77622 co �-t�_�4 t2 � 2460 1 104 105 106 107 A p� rt 12461 21 d P 741G I 12458 r47e _ PP126 V; 12462 1 f 2465 2 N N N N N N N B a. n a. 12 W ¢ 6 20 LMS 631 12455 o v 1 12450 — 12457 0 STRENG.AVE LU 2450 5 12445 0_ W S1 1 '/" zaap o ° IN 12450 4 V 12445 1z438 19 n 4 72435 O 73 of 74 ry r n ry I� co IN2 �� mi r- 100 101 102 1 4 a 10 r� a 3 12425 v P 24946 P 25 14 P 975 18 72444 12433 L!fl�n! 2 W P 79 1 2a30 12eT5 1 12 12424 [l cam+ m 1 12405 NWS 2652 mj �1 P 7 000 v � 1 Taaa? 17 J`y'f a , w 1 W I l ro ry Rem 3 P P 7 108 P 70062 2 N m 16 N ti w ti etiu g J JAP 6917 J Y a L BP LMP 6711 LMP 6738 VAP 8710 124 AVE N N N N Rem 1 12a"9E C , j p \1 �i 2 1 RW 7`5858 r Re m Rem 4 Rem 3 —, I P 18957 P 19 26 2 Fq �� P 70062 P 7185 ,, 1 2 j BCP 46509 P 38383 � ,� BCP 46510� I f, PA R{ A ra66 =--i BCP 46508 157 �� Rem. a �`� o a 23 1 P 24276 \ N V2 C5\ . 12347 4: tF3a- of 13 �t 2 1 — ?z2 EP7 07C? P1151 -- 2345 1 P 8914 NWS 2464 EP 6608� 1 S 1 /2 C 1 ^_33° P 72069 j 11 v '-EP 66064 _ Rem 1 42 12325 I I P 80319 � fr 43 A 12305 P 75480 I NWS 3018 M/APLE Rl D G E ZONE AMENDING E,ylcw No. 6787-20' 0 Map No. From: PS—' 1'Cne Family Urban Nesiden;ial) c: PM —' Cownnouse Kesiden ial) r N SCALE 1:2,000 Appendix C Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: December 30, 2010 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/074/10 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6785-2010 11716 Burnett Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-1 (Residential District). To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6785-2010 be given First Reading; and; That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule B of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999, and a complete Subdivision application. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: MANJIT RAI Owner: MAUREEN J POCHMARA Legal Description: South 1/2 of Lot 5 except part in Plan LMP2415, Section 17, Township 12, NWD Plan 8881 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: R-1 (Residential District) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation Urban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation Urban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation Urban Residential 1104 West: Use: Commercial Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial) Designation: Commercial Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Project Description: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 0.149 HA. Burnett Street and 117 Avenue Full Urban The subject site is located on the northeast corner of Burnett Street and 117 Avenue, just north of the Lougheed Highway. There is an old single family house located on this large lot and the applicant proposes to subdivide the site into 3 lots. The site is flat, contains a few large evergreen trees, and there are no watercourses or other environmental features in the area. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The site is designated Urban Residential and the proposed use is consistent with this designation. Zoningg B law: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 11716 Burnett Street from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) to permit a subdivsion of 3 lots. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. d) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. -2- This application has been forwarded to the Engineering Department and preliminary comments have been provided indicating that no Rezoning servicing is required. We anticipate that further evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading. e) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); 2. A Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. It is expected that once complete information is received, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6785-2010 will be amended. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge's Approving Officer. Prepay ,by: Ann Edwards, CPT „Segior Planning Technician A roved b . eying, MCP, MCIP �- Director o ing Approved ,h . Frank Quinn, Ygk, P. ng G Public Works evelopment Services Concurrence: J. L. ( im) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AE/ The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6785-2010 -3- - ----------------- "A, z - Appendix A m 55 11836 80 1182; 54 81 LMP 11048 89 11818 122 11811 135 1 11810 11824 11817 53 82 11810 88 123 11801 134 11800 1 $9 Rem 1 11816 11809 5 00 N C) a_ m P 8871 11797 � 87 11798 124 11791 133 11790 1 P 39452 1 11790 2 11791 86 a 11788 a 125 11781 132 11780 1 LP 76566 P 72307 A 11781 P 41319 103 11780 104 11779 85 11778 126 11771 131 v Imo a v � B 11775 P 106 1319 105 84 117sa 127 11761 130 11760 83 N 128 m N m 129 N 2 ti a N 1 /2 1 11761 K ¢ 11764 11765 P 51052 P 42061 d S 1 /2 1 ° A 108 Rem ,_-— 11749 1'� _ ._.__ CLIFF AVE. SUBJECT PROPERTY ` LPA82566 N 1� r...- ---68 1 N 2 N 3 4 ° m N m N N N N 01 N B (() N 1 N 4 � oGcy P 81957 11736 t' 00 P 71 17 P 9097 00 F y Rem 1� a s P 8881 P 703 a a P.tl 9097 67 Rem. A 1 2 2 2 2 3 LOT 1 S 1 /2 5 A 11716 2 117 AVE. ti 0 CO P 12588 11695 � O O m t0 N O O O 105 Rem. E �C) 60, N 227 N N N N N N N a 11690 1 co 11 sa 1 2 LOT 2 243 244 245 246 39 40 41 P 12588 a P 65141 U) 2 ZZ100 2 228 m 1686 242 P 2 677 N N 11669 N 11678 11675 11671 11680 P 5355 238 171 172 173 174 175 176 6j0 1 11 M 22. 11661 Q 0 6 S� m m rn rn c� P 12197 ZZ 15667 N N N N >> 239 648.54 8 GILLEY AVE. 11663 10 240 N 22� 11646 9 Q P 12197 11655 Rem 11659 N N N rn I I632 E ,9 241 :184: 183 182 181 N 180 2 11644 p N P 12316 6 cP>61 13 EP 12951 11633 j P 16011 � B M ZBea Rem. 11621 2 Clty.of Piti7,". ! Meadpws �i �� I 11716 BURNETT STREET - -_ _+, Q CORPORATION OF r THE DISTRICT OF 1J� .MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE N District of Langley PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,000 - { I _ -1-- -j- DATE: Oct 21, 2010 FILE: RZ/074/10 BY: PC PRASER R = Appendix B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6785-2010 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6785-2010." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: South Half Lot 5, Except Part in Plan LMP2415, Section 17, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 8881 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1502 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1(Residential District). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER --___-- 50_ _--- -j 1 11790 2 11791 A P 1319 LP 76566 11781 103 104 � B 1 11780 11779 P1319 P 72307 11775 Z °C 106 105 N 1 /2 1 co11764 11765 goy o N ,It`� N 11761 P 51052 P 42061 R a � 125 r86 1l88 11781 85 126 11778 11771 84 127 11768 11761 83 128 N N a cL S 1 /2 1 A 108 LU 11749 11750 11747 CLIFF AVE- _RW N'ly 20 Feet ----- Rem 11739 o N m LP 82566 A It N1/25 68 1N 2N 3N 4No1", CN ��'�� P 81957 r%-^ a- 11736 ao co P 71 17 r°'lrrr Rem d a P 8881 P 703 3 rrr 0 r 67 Rem. A 1 2 2 OT 1 r �Qrr LO S 1 /2 5 � _ r r O N Cl)LO Nr m �1 0) W 0) 2�2[k C\1 11716 N N N N N 117 AVE. r � r P 12588 C 0 y N M Lf Rem.1 G N 227 N CM C\j N N N + 60 a 11690 1 co 243 244 245 2461 LMP 2619 �P 12588 CL P 141 2 2 228 W 11686 242 11678 11675 N RW 48257 __� C0 11671 11680 238 171 172 173 1 n 1z c li `F`12197 ��0 239 ii667 --- N `v .9. 8 - - _v .e1 356 _-�- .. MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6785-2010 Map No. 1502 From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: R-1 (Residential District) MAPLE RIDGE N SCALE 1:1,500 4 Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: January 4, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/091/10 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6770-2010 24371 112 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to a new R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone, which proposes a minimum lot size of 315 m2 (3,400 ft2). The density proposed in this application is considerably in excess of the density identified in the Official Community Plan. The application is therefore not in compliance with the Albion Area Plan and the Official Community Plan. Should the application proceed, additional information is required. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6770-2010 not be given First Reading. FOMIM33to] 10 a) Background Context: Applicant: CIPE Homes Inc. Owner: Joanne H Montgomery Ronald J Montgomery Lillian J Montgomery Legal Description: Lot: 1, Section: 15, Township: 12, Plan: 7709 OCP: Existing: Low -Medium Density Residential Proposed: Medium Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: R-2 (Urban Residential District) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Rural Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation Agricultural South: Use: 112 Avenue, beyond which Single Family Rural Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation 1105 East: Use: Single Family Rural Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation West: Use: Single Family Rural Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Project Description: Single Family Rural Residential, Agricultural Single Family Urban Residential 3.76 HA (9.29 acres) 112 Avenue Urban The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to a new R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone to allow for future subdivision. The R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone proposes a minimum lot size of 315 m2 (3,400 ft2). At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. If this application proceeds, a detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading, if applicable. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: Albion Area Plan The property is designated Low -Medium Density Residential on the Albion Area Plan. The proposed R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone (with a minimum lot size of 315 m2) does not comply with this land use designation. Section 10.2.1.A Residential Designations of the Albion Area Plan states: Residential Low -Medium Density corresponds with single detached or duplex housing with lot sizes ranging from 891 m2 (9590 ft2) to 557 m2 (5996 ft2). In addition, Section 10.2.7 Albion Zoning Matrix lists the following zones as corresponding zones with the Low -Medium Density Residential land use designation: • SRS Special Urban Residential (minimum lot size of 837 m2) • RS-1b One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential (minimum lot size of 557 m2) • RT-1 Two Family Urban Residential (minimum lot size of 891 m2) Note that the existing R-1 (Residential District) zone, which has a larger minimum lot area (371 m2) than the proposed R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone, also does not comply with the Low -Medium Density Residential land use designation. -2- Background Information 1994 Albion Area Land Use Review The basis of the Albion Area Plan was the result of a public process in 1994 which included four (4) workshops and two (2) open houses. Following this public process, the Albion Area Land Use Review report was prepared for the District of Maple Ridge. This report included descriptions of the various neighbourhoods as well as proposed land use designations that were subsequently adopted in the 1996 Official Community Plan. As noted in the Albion Area Land Use Review, the subject property is located within the "North of Kanaka Creek" neighbourhood. The report states the following regarding this neighbourhood: Much of this area is classified as having high environmental sensitivity, various creeks cut through the area on their way south to Kanaka Creek. As a result, much of the developable land is surrounded by highly sensitive corridors. The main exception to this pattern concerns those areas fronting onto 240th Street. Except for properties fronting onto 240th Street, only low to medium densities are proposed due to the dispersed nature of developable blocks of land. Where possible, local access should be onto 1101h or 112th Street. In order to improve internal circulation, a local collector linking 110th and 112th is proposed. An elementary site is proposed to front onto the above noted collector road to serve the area north of Kanaka Creek. An equestrian trail is proposed by the GVRD on the north side of Kanaka Creek, other possible trails could extend north along the edges of environmentally sensitive areas. The Albion Area Land Use Review reiterates the above description regarding the neighbourhood north of Kanaka Creek with the following: Except for properties fronting onto 240th Street, only low to medium densities are proposed. This is due to the dispersed nature of developable blocks of land, the proximity of permanent low density areas (ALR to the north and Kanaka Creek Regional Park to the south) and existing land use patterns. 1996 Official Community Plan Based on the 1994 Albion Area Land Use Review, the subject lands were designated Single Family Residential at 12 units per net hectare (SFR12) in the 1996 Official Community Plan. The SFR12 designation aligned with the SRS (Special Urban Residential) zone which provided for lots with a minimum area of 837 m2. 2006 Official Community Plan The Official Community Plan process carefully laid out density distributions throughout the community to accommodate the projected population numbers. During the review, there was an effort to collapse the number of land use designations in the Albion Area and to provide for some limited additional density in the area. In 2006 the subject lands were designated Low -Medium Density Residential which provided for single detached housing form with lot sizes ranging from -3- 557m2 to 837 m2 (utilizing the RS-1b and SRS zones). The duplex housing form was also included as a corresponding use within this designation. Increasing density in any area for single applications has an impact on the densities of other areas in the community. The introduction of the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone was considered suitable as it maintained the larger lot single family character of the neighbourhood as described in the 1994 Albion Area Land Use Review. It was also recognized that the minimum width of the RS-1b zone (15 m), although slightly less than that required in the SRS zone (18 m), satisfied the 80% criteria for neighbourhood infill adopted elsewhere in the 2006 Official Community Plan. Finally, the introduction of the RS-1b zone was not likely to place significant stress on servicing capacity in the area. Intent of the R-2 (Urban Residential District) Zone On September 14, 2010 Council gave First Reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6758-2010 which also proposes to create the new R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone. The related Council Report noted an amendment would be required to the Official Community Plan Zoning Matrix (Appendix C) to include the proposed R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone. The Council Report did not identify any amendment to the Silver Valley, Albion or Town Centre Area Plans. With a proposed minimum lot size of 315 m2, the R-2 zone was introduced to bridge the lot size gap between the existing R-1 (Residential District) zone and the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone. Neither the R-1 zone nor the R-3 zone, however, complies with the Low -Medium Density Residential land use designation of the Albion Area Plan (Section 10.2.7). Proposed Official Community Plan (Albion Area Plan) Amendment The proposed development would require two (2) amendments to the Official Community Plan (Albion Area Plan): The re -designation of the subject property from Low -Medium Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, and An amendment to the Zoning Matrix (Section 10.2.7) to permit the application of the R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone for property designated Medium Density Residential. As noted above, based on the 1994 public process and significant environmental features in the area, the lands situated north of Kanaka Creek were designated Low Density Residential and Low - Medium Density Residential in the Albion Area Plan. With the exception of the lands fronting 240th Street, there are no Medium Density Residential designations or land uses situated north of Kanaka Creek. The higher densities in the Albion Area were allocated south of Kanaka Creek, with the highest densities situated south of 104 Avenue. The current proposal to amend the Official Community Plan (Albion Area Plan) by re -designating the subject property Medium Density Residential is inconsistent with the outcome of the 1994 public process and the current policies of the Albion Area Plan. As such the proposed Official Community Plan amendment is not supportable. ME If the proposed Official Community Plan amendment is supported, the following outcomes would be anticipated: • Establishment of a new land use pattern for the area (as indicated on Appendix C) which would necessitate a review of a larger area of North Albion. A review of that nature is not on the work plan for the Planning Department; • A significant increase in the density envisioned for the area (from 12 units per net hectare (as permitted in the 1996 Official Community Plan) to density in the range of 30 units per net hectare (typical of R-1 and CD-1-93 zones with similar lots sizes); • Additional demand on servicing capacity in the area and the municipal system at large (comments from the Engineering Department would be required); • Additional demand on school capacity in the area; note that the 112 Avenue elementary school site has been removed from the Area Plan (comments from the School District would be required); • The subject property borders land within the Agricultural Land Reserve. Generally land use densities adjacent to ALR lands are to be reduced, not increased. This is suggested in Policy 6-12(c) of the Official Community Plan. Other Proposed Official Community Plan (Albion Area Plan) Amendments On October 12, 2010, Council gave First Reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6761-2010 which will require an amendment to the Official Community Plan (Albion Area Plan). This amendment proposes to add the RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone, minimum lot size of 668 m2, as a corresponding zone under the Low Density Residential designation. The Low Density Residential designation currently aligns only with the RS-1d (One Family Urban (Half Acre) Residential) zone, which requires a minimum lot size of 2000 m2. This amendment was deemed supportable for the following reasons: • No additional density was allocated to the Low Density Residential designation during the 2006 Official Community Plan review, whereas the other land use designations have already received additional density through the collapsing of previous land use categories; • The RS-1 zone has existed for years in the Zoning Bylaw yet was not included on the Albion Area Zoning Matrix (Section 10.2.7); • The RS-1 zone is one of the largest urban residential zones in the District of Maple Ridge, with a minimum lot size of 668 m2 and a minimum width of 18 m; • The RS-1 zone has been applied to lands designated Low Density Residential when using the density transfer provisions in the Albion Area Plan (the single family subdivision located at 241A Street and 113 Avenue). Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to a new R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone to allow for future subdivision. Should this application proceed, any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top of bank of all watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development IWO Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Develoogment Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting would be required for this application should it proceed. Prior to Second Reading the applicant would be required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Should this application proceed, comments and input will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Parks Department; e) School District; The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading, if applicable. e) Alternatives: If First Reading is given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6770-2010, in respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter except for early consultation with the School District and early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. As this application would increase the potential number of households, the School District should be consulted. Furthermore, if First Reading is given the following information must be provided prior to consideration of Second Reading, as required by Development Procedural Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. An Official Community Plan Amendment Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); 3. Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); 4. Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. Kd►[��l►yL�]� The development proposal is not in compliance with the Official Community Plan and an amendment to such is not supportable, therefore it is recommended that this application be denied. Prepared by: Patrick Ward Rlanging Technician Approved Concurrence: PW/dp ng, MCP, MCIP 'canning Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Er* GM: Public Works & D elopment Services J. L. (Jim) I ufe Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6770-2010 Appendix C - Preliminary Concept Plan -7- Appendix 3 3 P 68166 P 77744 11282 P 681 N i M RKMI 1 2 m 2 P 7714/ N SUBJECT PROPERTY r-00"I ,-� P 22387 1 P 7709 B P 23217 112 AVE. e P 23217 Clt Pitt _ Mea ows _ I ,f � j i 24371 112 AVENUE I O r• � 1 ��� ���1 I CORPORATION OF --_ THE DISTRICT OF N J `� ; RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE SCALE 1:2,500 District of Langley `. .ems - � rr Fes, PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Oct 5, 2010 FILE: RZ/091/10 BY: PC FRASER R. �''4 Appendix B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6770 - 2010 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6770 - 2010." 2. That PART 3 BASIC PROVISIONS, SECTION 302 ZONES (1) is amended by inserting the following between "R-1 Residential District" and "R-3 Special Amenity Residential District" R-2 Urban Residential District 3. Amend Schedule "D" Minimum Lot Area and Dimensions by the addition of the following; "R-2 see section 60113" after "R-1 12m 24m 371m2" 4. Amend PART 6 RESIDENTIAL ZONES, SECTION 601, ONE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES (R-1, RS-1, RS-1a, RS-1b, SRS, RS-1c, RS-1d, RS-2, RS-3, RT-1, RE) by the deletion of the section in its entirety and replacement with the following: 601 ONE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES (R-1, R-2, R-3 RS-1, RS-1a, RS-1b, SRS, RS-1c, RS-1d, RS-2, RS-3, RT-1, RE, CD-1-93)" A. PERMITTED USES OF LAND, BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES Subject to the regulations of Section 401, 402 and 601B, the following uses and no others shall be permitted in the zone indicated: USE ZONE IN WHICH USE IS PERMITTED R-1 R-2 R-3 RS-1 RS-1a RS-1b RS-1c RS-1d RS-2 RS-3 RT-1 SRS RE CD-1- 93 Agriculture One Family Residential J J J J Two Family Residential Boarding J J J Accessory Residential J ./ ,/ ./ J Accessory Home J J J ,I .f / J J J Occupation Accessory Off - Street Parking J J J J J J J J J J J J J J Accessory Employee J Residential Accessory Produce Sales J Elderly Citizens Residential Temporary Residential (subject to ,/ ,/ ./ ./ J Section 402) Rental Stable Temporary Tourist Accomodation Secondary Suite ./ J J J J ,/ ./ Residential Hobby Kennel Neighbourhood Daycare J J J J J J '/ Detached Garden Suite f J J J J J Use (subject to Section 402) 5. That PART 6 RESIDENTIAL ZONES is amended by inserting the following after Section 601A "CD-1-93 Amenity Residential District". 601B R-2 Urban Residential District A. PERMITTED USES Subject to the regulations of Section 401 and Section 601, the following uses and no others shall be permitted in the R-2 zone. 1. One Family Residential (limited to one per lot) 2. Boarding Use (Sec. 401 & 601) 3. Accessory Residential Use 4. Accessory Home Occupation Use (Sec. 401) 5. Accessory Off Street Parking Use 6. Temporary Residential Use (subject to Section 402) B. DENSITY 1. All buildings and structures shall not exceed a lot coverage of 50%; 2. Buildings and structures for Accessory Residential Use shall not exceed a lot coverage of 12% C. AREAAND DIMENSIONS 1. Lot Area a) No person shall create a lot which is less than 315 m2 in area. 2. Lot Dimensions a) Width: With lane access: No person shall create an interior lot which is less than 9.2 metres in width measured at a distance of 7.5 metres from the front property line. No person shall create an exterior lot which borders either a street or lane on 2 sides, one of which is a side lot line which is less than 13.2m in width measured at a distance of 7.5 metres from the front property line. Without lane access: No person shall create an interior lot which is less than 10.5 m in width measured at a distance 7.5 metres from the front property line. No person shall create an exterior lot which borders either a street or lane on 2 sides, one of which is a side lot line which is less than 13.5 metres in width measured at a distance of 7.5 metres from the front property line. b) Depth: No person shall create a lot which is less than 27 metres in depth. ❑, YARD REQUIREMENTS a) Regulations for the size, shape and siting of buildings and structures shall be: 1. For lots with a rear lane, shall be sited not less than: a) 3.0 metres from the front lot line; b) 13.0 metres from the rear lot line; c) 1.2 metres from the interior lot line; d) 3.0 metres from an exterior side lot line; 2. For lots with no rear lane, shall be sited not less than: a) 3.0 metres from the front lot line except that the distance to the garage shall not be less than 5.5 metres; b) 8.0 metres from the rear lot line; c) 1.2 metres from the interior lot line; d) 3.0 metres from the exterior lot line. b) Buildings and Structures for Accessory Residential Use and Accessory Off -Street Parking Use shall be sited not less than: i) 1.0 metres from the rear lot line; ii) 0.45 metres from an interior side lot line provided that a minimum setback of 2 m is maintained for the other side yard; iii) 2.0 metres from an exterior side yard; iv) 11.0 metres from a front lot line; v) 4.5 metres from a principal use measured from the face of any chimney, bay window, hutch or nook permitted elsewhere in this bylaw. E. HEIGHT 1. All buildings and structures for one family residential use shall not exceed a height of 9.75 metres nor 2 storeys in height. 2. All buildings used for accessory residential use and/or accessory off street parking use shall not exceed a height of 4.9 metres. F. OTHER REGULATIONS: 1. Access Vehicular access for lots backing on a Municipal lane will be restricted to the lane. G. Off Street Parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with "Maple Ridge Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350 - 1990." H. A residential use shall be permitted only if the site is serviced to the standard set out in Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 4800 - 1993 as amended. 6. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Section 15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 7709 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1498 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-2 (Urban Residential District). 7. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of AD. 20 . O W M- : CORPORATE OFFICER MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No Map No. From: To 6770-2010 1498 RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) R-2 (Urban Residential District) MAPLE R111GE BMJ5h Columhia N SCALE 1:3,500 Appendix C F- Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: December 30, 2010 and Members of Council FILE NO: DP/110/10 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Multi -Family Development Permit 11566 224 Street FXW1111I►V1:&111M/_11"V A Multi -Family Development Permit application has been received for the above noted property in support of a four storey, 35 unit apartment building. This application is subject to the Town Centre Area Development Permit Guidelines - Port Haney & Waterfront Precinct as outlined in the 2006 Official Community Plan. Council approved rezoning of the property to CRM (Commercial/Residential) on October 13, 2009 with application RZ/045/06 and DP/045/06 was also approved at the same meeting. The applicant has since made changes to the proposed development that require Council's approval of a new Development Permit. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/110/10 respecting property located at 11566 224 Street. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: TARSEM GILL Owner: K B S DEVELOPMENT LTD. Legal Description: Parcel 1 except: part dedicated road on Plan LMP42053, D.L 398, GP 1, NWD, Plan LMP13237 OCP: Existing: Port Haney Multi -Family, Commercial and Mixed -Use Proposed: Port Haney Multi -Family, Commercial and Mixed -Use Zoning: Existing: CRM (Commercial/Residential) Proposed: CRM (Commercial/Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Sports Bar/Restaurant Zone: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Designation: Port Haney Multi -Family, Commercial and Mixed Use South: Use: Haney Bypass (Ministry of Highways) 1106 East: Use: Vacant Zone: RM-3 (High Density Apartment) Designation: Ground Oriented Multi -Family West: Use: Vacant (Ministry of Highways) Zone: M-1(Service Industrial) Designation: Park Existing Use of Property: Vacant, previously single family residential Proposed Use of Property: Apartment Access: 224 Street Servicing: Full Urban Previous Applications: RZ/045/06, DP/045/06, VP/045/06, DP/016/10 b) Project Description: Council approved rezoning of this property to CRM (Commercial/Residential) on October 13, 2009 with application RZ/045/06 and Multi -family Development Permit DP/045/06 was also approved at the same meeting. The applicant has since made changes to the proposed development that require Council's approval of a new Development Permit. The financial costs for the construction of the originally proposed building foundations were found to be excessive due to the "Haney Clay" subsoil conditions found on the site and the resulting structural engineering requirements that would be necessary to stabilize the development. The solution is to relocate the underground parking entrance farther to the south and eliminate the large retaining structure and entry ramp on the north property line. The new parking entry better utilizes the site grades for access to the parking level and provides additional useable outdoor area, including a water feature added to the outdoor amenity area. The exterior building design and materials have not changed except to provide 9' ceilings on all floors. The site slopes from the northeast to the southwest and is located at the southeast end of 224th Street, adjacent to the Haney Bypass. A four storey wood -frame apartment building with one level of underground parking is proposed, and most of the units and the roof top patio will have the advantage of the views of the Fraser River and beyond. The site features terraced retaining walls with landscaping of various heights that will serve to mitigate noise generated by the adjacent Haney Bypass and CPR right-of-way. The architect has incorporated sound attenuation measures into the building design and materials. Heritage colours and traditional materials will be featured in recognition of the heritage character of Port Haney. The proposed building contains 35 units ranging in size from 63.2m2 (680 ft2) to 97.9m2 (1054 ft2) with both one and two bedrooms units. An amenity room on the main floor with an adjacent outdoor amenity space on the east side of the building and a roof top patio covered with a trellis will be available for the residents' use. Underground parking will be provided with access from 224 Street at the northwest corner of the site. Visitor Parking spaces will be located within the underground parking that will be accessible outside of the security gate. A long term bicycle storage room will be located in the underground parking level and bicycle racks are to be provided at the building exits for short term storage. -2- c) Planning Analysis: Town Centre Development Permit Area -Port Haney and Waterfront Precinct: This property is subject to the guidelines of Section 8.11 Town Centre Development Permit Area Guidelines - Port Haney and Waterfront Precinct of the Official Community Plan that aim to regulate the form and character of development located within this area. This development respects the key guideline concepts as outlined in this section. 1. Promote Port Haney and the Waterfront as an important heritage, tourism -oriented area. This multi -family residential building will provide vibrancy to the area and will be highly visible from the Haney Bypass. Significant landscaping within the site terracing will surround the site and will continue on the Highways land on the Bypass frontage. The project is located within walking distance of the Civic Core, the waterfront and the West Coast Express station. 2. Provide a pedestrian -oriented, mixed use commercial and residential environment. The site is located on a pedestrian link from the downtown to the waterfront and the West Coast Exchange station with the Haney Bypass underpass located just to the west of the site. The significant slopes on the site prohibit individual units from directly access the street, however the main entrance has stairs and ramp access directly to 224 Street and a rear walkway provides access around the building and to the Haney Bypass. All ground floor units have exterior doors to at -grade patios and to the common amenity areas. 3. Enhance the heritage quality, character and vibrancy of Port Haney and the Waterfront. An urban building is proposed with an attractive presence to the street. Although there is very little existing heritage character in the immediate area, this proposed development will provide a heritage flavour through use of durable materials, Haney -type brick, heritage colours and architectural design. 4. Capitalize on important views. The location of the building on a knoll allows the units to take advantage of the views to the east, south and west overlooking the Fraser River and beyond. A Rooftop Patio will be located on the south end of the building roof with excellent views of the Fraser River. The views from the adjacent restaurant to the north were considered in the building siting and negative impacts have been avoided. 5. Provide outdoor space. A large outdoor amenity area will be provided on the east side of the building adjacent to the common amenity room for residents' use. A pedestrian connection from this area to the Haney Bypass will be provided. The large Rooftop Patio will provide additional outdoor space for residents' use. -3- 6. Provide climate appropriate landscaping and green features. Significant landscaping within the site terracing will surround the site and will continue on the Highways land on the Bypass frontage. A variety of plantings at various heights on the south elevation will serve to mitigate noise generated by the adjacent Haney Bypass and CPR. Several existing evergreen trees have been identified for retention adjacent to the site and will be incorporated into the new landscaping. 7. Maintain street interconnectivity. Parking for this development will be located underground with access to 224 Street at the northwest corner of the site. There are no lanes on this side of 224 Street. There will continue to be no vehicular access/egress to the Haney Bypass and access to the site will be solely from 224 Street. The south foot of 224 Street will be finished with curb, sidewalk, and street trees. As noted above, pedestrian connectivity will be improved with a sidewalk connection to the Haney Bypass. Town Center Parking standards: The amendment to the Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw, approved December 14, 2010, for revised parking standards in the Town Centre resulted in a reduced parking requirement for this development as it is located within Sub Area 1(Port Haney). The development now has an excess of 9 parking spaces, including 1 extra Visitor parking space. d) Advisory Design Panel: The project was positively reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel in January, 2008. These proposed revisions have not altered the exterior building design or materials, except to six inches additional height to allow 9 foot ceilings on all floors; therefore it was not necessary for further review by the Panel. e) Intergovernmental Issues: The Ministry of Transportation has approved the installation and maintenance of the revised landscaping on the Highways land adjacent to the south property line of this site, including the walkway/stairs to the Haney Bypass. f) Financial Implications: In accordance with Council's Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of the estimated landscape cost will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Approximately seven street trees will be added to the municipal street tree inventory on completion of this project. The costs associated with maintaining these trees will need to be included in a subsequent operating budget. As the development proposal complies with the Town Centre Development Permit Area Guidelines - Port Haney and Waterfront Precinct of the Official Community Plan for form and character, it is recommended that DP/110/10 be given favourable consideration. Prepared by: Ann Edwards, CPT Senior Planning Technician \tx, ()A - - - - proved J is MCP, MCIP oof Planning Approve : Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng _ GM: Pudic W9rIQ& Development Services I L. (YR) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AE/ The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Site Plan Appendix C - Building Elevations Appendix D - Landscape Plans -5- ae 17 rr . 1884 1654 cp 22 21 20 19 18 11671 RP 52214F P 1 5 S 1/2 A11657 11656 r Ap(w� RP 6192 RP 5637 85 p 41 P 82887 P 155 11641 ^ 1 P 164 34 1165o a A 11 12 13 14 2 1 86 cCyh] u7 u7 ry �/ in 22486 [V (�i� N " A K 2 N N N N N [J CALLAGHAN AVE. �nOa 87 11630 �ry 0 p 1953 T 23 M a NWg 3 S 31 131 25 P 41741 N p A 11595 a8 11617 a o Rem. a A 2 to w m 24 11813 p r55 11580 1587 0 izs a RF 65$8D 1575 Cr PC/.A ti �p rssl A M22 ¢ SUBJECT PROPERTY Re 9 Z Rem Rent 1}5ss 6755 1T 8 �15se Rem 10 Rem r� 9 Rem 1 N P S 84 r B a rr2 P 86773 R rr'3iz Rem 1 \ RA 7373 Rp S335 P RP 4605 N R P 166S4F H L hq�Fy °yA NWS 3383 C P 87404 Rem. 91 P 41741 Rem 5J joss � M '°s4 � 15 �r Clt f Pitt I Meadows =s: 0 11566 224 STREET o *i CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PILE RIDGE MA N District of yI I PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley —-y SCALE 1:2,000 ` DATE: Nov 12, 2010 FILE:DP/110/10 BY: PC y FRASER 1�• ...; _-_ ���� ���� �r�� ��� �0�0 E1o�© � - - - MMIC olMM :. =!!r !!!! 3� NE I 0 snouv�co ,� E ® g^ g T C �imire uauavdv inn � : Hasa ... �m e e B g N �iRu-e E � ry Y w f K e $¢k y qLqe x - e 6 ?! f 4 l 1"1 I t z bU Hi� i RIDGEMAPLE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Door-to-door Solicitation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DATE: December 10, 2010 FILE NO: 0320-01 ATTN: C of W - Corp & Fin To grant permission for door-to-door canvassing for donations as requested in the letter from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of B.C. & Yukon dated November 29, 2010. RECOMMENDATION: That the request of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of B.C. & Yukon for permission to canvass door- to-door during the month of February 2011 be approved. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Pursuant to Section 42 of the Highway & Traffic Bylaw, soliciting for donation (door-to-door canvassing, tag days, etc.) must be approved by the Municipal Council by way of a resolution. b) Citizen/Customer Implications: Door-to-door canvassing and tag days are the means by which non-profit organizations such as the Heart and Stroke Foundation are able to raise funds for research and promote awareness. CONCLUSION: In order to meet the requirements of the Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic Bylaw No. 6704-2009, Council's approval is required for all requests for soliciting for donation. Prepared by: Diana Dalton C{e, k's Department Approved by: Path Gill, k Comm GA �neral,Wla�i alter. Fina al and Corporate Services Concurrence: J L. (Jim) Rile Chief Administrative Officer Attachment j 1131 HEART& STROKE FOUNDATION OF BC & YUKON Finding answers. For life. Tri-Cities/Fraser Valley Office 2239C McAllister Avenue Port Coquitlam, B.C. V3C2A9 November 29, 2010 T 604.472.0045 F 604.472.0055 Chair Peter Scott President & CEO Bobbe Wood REGIONAL OFFICES Kamloops 250.372.3938 Kelowna 250.860.6275 Nanaimo 250.754.5274 North Vancouver 604.983.8492 Prince George 250.562.8611 Richmond 604.279.7130 Surrey 604.591.1955 Tri-Citias 6114.472-0045 Vancouver 604-736,4088 Victoria 250.382.4035 For more heart and stroke information: www.heartandstroke.bc.ca 1.888.HSF.INFO (1.888.473.4636) District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Attention: Mayor Ernie Daykin Dear Mayor Daykin, � r �i71M DEC 0 9 2010 MAIM Every February the Heart and Stroke Foundation celebrates Heart Month by holding its Person -to - Person Campaign. During this month, we rely on the dedication of thousands of volunteers who selflessly give their time by canvassing their neighbourhood to collect donations to help us reach our fundraising goals each year. The Heart and Stroke Foundation protects the lives of all Canadians by funding world class scientific research which results in medical advancements, social change and education to prevent and reduce death and disability from heart disease and stroke. More than nine hundred hospital and university - based research teams depend on us year after year nationally. More specifically there are forty-eight research teams in British Columbia, which receive funding from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of BC and Yukon. February is recognized as Heart Month in Canada and the Tri-Cities/Fraser Valley Office of the Heart and Stroke Foundation respectfully requests your proclamation of February 2011 as Heart Month in the District of Maple Ridge. I would be grateful to receive notification of approval of this proclamation. To this end, I have enclosed a draft 'Proclamation' for your reference. If I may provide any additional information, please contact me at your convenience. I can be reached at (604)472-0045 or by email at door_tri@hsf.bc.ca. Sincerely, Marl ene Wagner Person -to -Person Campaign Coordinator Enc. Business number 11881 8343 RR0001 Proclamatiro� To: Mayor Ernie Daykin, District of Maple Ridge February 2011 WHEREAS: One in three Canadian deaths are due to heart disease and stroke every year, making it the leading cause of death in the country; AND WHEREAS: The Heart and Stroke Foundation protects the lives of all Canadians by funding world class scientific research which results in medical advancements, social change and education to prevent and reduce death and disability from heart disease and stroke; AND WHEREAS: February is Heart Month in Canada, during which the Heart and Stroke Foundation Person -to -Person Campaign takes place, to support on -going heart disease and stroke research and programs; AND WHEREAS: We applaud and commend the thousands of volunteers, staff and researchers of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of British Columbia and Yukon for their dedication and commitment and wish them continued success; I, THEREFORE: proclaim that the month of February be observed as "Heart Month" in the District of Maple Ridge. I further urge all citizens to co-operate with the Heart and Stroke Foundation of British Columbia and Yukon Person -to -Person Campaign, and all civic, social and fraternal organizations and business establishments to give this campaign the greatest possible support. Put your heart into it and make a difference! Alift HEART& 1WSTROKE FOUNDATION Finding answers. For life Deep Roots Greater Heights December 13, 2010 File No: 0630-01 Marlene Wagner Person -to -Person Campaign Coordinator Heart & Stroke Foundation of BC & Yukon 2239C McAllister Avenue Port Coquitlam, BC V3C 2A9 Dear Marlene Wagner: We are in receipt of your letter dated November 29, 2010 in which you request February 2011 be proclaimed Heart Month. Although Council recognizes that proclamation requests may be for a worthwhile cause that could benefit the community as a whole, a policy was adopted by Council to decline the issuance of proclamations. For your information, the Province of British Columbia, Ministry of the Attorney General, issues Orders in Council proclaiming special events. The Ministry can be contacted at 250-387-4376, or by calling Enquiry BC at 604-660-2421 who will connect your call to the Ministry free of charge. With respect to the Person -to -Person Campaign to be conducted during the month of February 2011, pursuant to Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 6704-2009, soliciting for donation must be authorized by the Municipal Council. The matter will be referred to Council for consideration on January 11, 2011. Further correspondence will be forthcoming to advise of Council's decision. Yours truly, cu��palt—L— Ceri Marlo Manager of Legislative Services E.. District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Canada o Tel: 604-463-5221 - Fax: 604-467-7329 enquiries@mapleridcle.ca - www.maoleridae.ca Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: December 13, 2010 and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer Disbursements for the month ended November 30, 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council has authorized all voucher payments to be approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor and a Finance Manager. Council authorizes the vouchers for the following period through Council resolution. The disbursement summary for the past period is attached for information. Expenditure details are available by request through the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION: That the "disbursements as listed below for the month ended November 30, 2010 now be approved". GENERAL $ 6,017,326 PAYROLL $ 1,486,299 PURCHASE CARD $ 105,105 $ 7.608.730 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan. b) Community Communications: The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial disbursements. 1132 c) Business Plan / Financial Implications: Highlights of larger items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution • Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. - land acquisition 22600 blk of 119th $ 600,000 • G.V. Water District - water consumption August 4 - August 31/10 $ 660,425 • G.V. Water District - water consumption Sept. 1 - October 5/10 $ 585,493 • Tag Construction Ltd. - Abernethy Connector realignment $ 443,117 d) Policy Implications: Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice. CONCLUSIONS: The disbursements for the month ended November 30, 2010 have been reviewed and are in order. Prepared by: G'Ann Rygg Accounting Clerk II Approved by: rtrevor Thompson, CGA Manager of Financial Planning Approved by: Pbul Gill, BBA, C GM yr to /' ial Services Concurrence: J.L. im) Ruleu Ch' f Administrative Officer gmr CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - NOVEMBER 2010 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNT 0752281 BC Ltd Security refund 221,292 0759355 BC Ltd Security refund 22,500 0809306 BC Ltd Security refund 25,000 0871933 BC Ltd DCC forgiveness 64,117 Aecom Canada Ltd 230 Street drainage 6,247 Cottonwood Creek salmon habitat enhancement 7,855 River Road storm sewer 20,121 Spencer Creek pump station 6,004 40,227 Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd 2010 capital water project 8,826 216 St & 128 Ave inspection services 3,152 224 St & Abernethy Way inspection services 5,335 17,313 Associated Engineering(BC) Ltd 240 Street bridge @ Kanaka Creek 8,206 Silver Valley storm water management plan 44,015 52,221 Atlantic Pacific Land Corp Security refund 63,100 BC Hydro Hydro charges Nov 91,427 BFI Canada Vancouver Waste disposal Sept & Oct 16,065 Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd Maintenance: Banners 268 Davit Pole replacement 22,344 Cell Tower @256th St 9,313 Fairgrounds 2,776 Firehall 575 Intersection camera repairs 5,867 Leisure Centre 2,727 Light fixtures 2,363 Memorial Park 1,055 Pedestrian sign 392 Pitt Meadows Heritage Hall 458 Pitt Meadows Rec Centre 119 Remove hanging baskets 753 Rental property 519 SPCA 255 Street lights 4,104 Street light pole repairs 6,468 Traffic sign 282 60,638 CUPE Local 622 Dues - pay periods 10/22 & 10/23 20,874 Cedar Crest Lands (BC) Ltd Cliff Park grass playfield installation 109,115 Chevron Canada Ltd Fuel Dec 55,873 City Of Pitt Meadows 2010 baskets seasonal program 9,576 Telus July - Oct 1,398 50% share of tourism costs 8,201 19,174 Columbia Bitulithic Ltd Duraphalt 49,661 Converge Construction Ltd Spencer Creek pump station 50,943 Con -West Contracting Ltd Spencer Creek outfall upgrade 43,528 Cushman & Wakefield Ltd Land acquisition - 22600 block of 119 Ave 600,000 Dams Ford Lincoln Sales Ltd 2011 Ford F750 XL truck 90,975 Dixon Networks Corporation Fibre optic installation 56,867 Fitness Edge Fitness classes & programs Nov 22,307 Fortran Traffic Systems Ltd Traffic signal equipment 22,568 Greater Vanc Water District Water consumption August 4 - August 31/10 660,425 Water consumption September 1- October 5/10 585,493 Barnston pump station 117883 1,257,801 Guillevin International Inc Happy Heart Fitness & Educ Imperial Paving Insignia Homes Silver Valley Jack 4 Trade Kanaka Holdings Ltd LTS Infrastructure Services Manulife Financial Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council Maple Ridge Alliance Church Medical Services Plan Minister Of Finance MJT Enterprises Ltd Municipal Insurance Assoc Municipal Pension Plan BC Narland Properties (Haney) Ltd Raincity Janitorial Sery Ltd Receiver General For Canada Remax Ridge Meadows Realty RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ridgemeadows Recycling Society Spencer Brook Estates Ltd Tag Construction Ltd Terasen Gas Warrington PCI Management Wedler Engineering Young, Anderson - Barristers Disbursements In Excess $15,000 Disbursements Under $15,000 Total Payee Disbursements Payroll Purchase Cards - Payment Total Disbursements November 2010 Fire fighters' equipment Fire fighters' protective wear Operations electrical supplies Weight room supervision & childcare activity room Roadworks Security refund Albion Park pathway Security refund Fibre optic settlement Employee benefits premiums Art Centre grant Nov Program revenue Oct Theatre rental Security refund Employee medical & health premiums School tax remittance Skating lessons Insurance deductibles Employee benefits premiums Security refund Janitorial services Oct Firehalls Library Municipal Hall Operations Randy Herman Building RCMP Employer/Employee remit PP10/22 & 10/23 Land acquisition deposit - 22100 block of 121 Ave Ice rental Oct Curling rink operating expenses Sept Monthly contract for recycling Nov Weekly recycling Litter pick-up contract 2010 chipping program Security refund Abernethy Connector realignment Natural gas Advance for Tower common costs Nov Tower expenses Oct 256 Street sanitary sewer extension Professional fees Oct PP10/22 & PP10/23 GMR \\DOVE\CorpServ\Finance\Accounting\Accounts Payable\AP Remittances (Disbursements)\2010\[Monthly Council Report 2010.xlsx]NOV'10 377 6,136 19,048 44,321 7,690 1,488 6,317 5,706 3,559 3,150 4,415 3,676 62,001 3,012 86,746 312 1,848 9 967 25,561 15,388 23,288 26,000 26,864 124,992 22,000 109,816 53,499 20,000 27,306 15,395 23,657 30,835 296,452 49,103 26,823 487,411 20,000 65,013 91,173 73,750 443,117 16,289 50,000 6,643 56,643 23,860 29,928 5,297,748 719,578 6,017,326 $1,486,299 105,105 7,608,730 Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Adjustments to 2010 Collector's Roll EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Dec 22, 2010 T21-212-003 BC Assessment (BCA) has revised the assessed value for the 2010 Collector's Roll through the issuance of Supplementary Roll 10. The Collector is required to make all the necessary changes to the municipal tax roll records and report these adjustments to Council. RECOMMENDATION(S): The report dated Dec. 22, 2010 is submitted for information. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Three folios are affected: A review by BC Assessment resulted in corrections to two folios changing the assessed value for School and Other levies only. An appeal to the Property Assessment Appeal Board (PAAB) concluded with PAAB directing BCA to reduce the value of a folio in the Light Industry Class by $266,000. (Municipal tax revenue changes: Decrease in Class 5 (Light Ind) - $3,123) b) Business Plan/Financial Implications: There is a total decrease of $3,123 in municipal tax revenue. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing review by BCA and appeals heard by PAAB resulted in a decrease of $266,000 to the Light Industry assessment base. 1133 This report dated Dec. 22, 2010 is submitted for information and is available to the public. Prepared by: Silvia Ru"dge Manager, Revenue & Collections Appr ved b : Paul Gill, B.B.A.; C.G.A. General Manager: Corporate &,AMncial Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) R le G Chief Admitistrative Officer Deep Roots Greater Heights IICIIN FROM: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Committees of Council Policy DATE: December 29, 2010 FILE NO: ATTN: Council EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: To provide consistency in procedures amongst its Advisory Committees the attached "Committees of Council Policy" was drafted. At its May 10, 2010 Council Workshop, Council first considered this Policy and directed that the Policy be referred to the City of Pitt Meadows and to all of its Committees and Commissions for comment. The Policy was reviewed by all those groups and no comments were submitted at the time this report was prepared. RECOMMENDATION: That the Committees of Council Policy attached to the staff report dated December 29, 2010 be adopted. DISCUSSION: Section 142 of the Community Charter permits Council to establish and appoint select committees to consider or inquire into any matter and to report its findings and opinion to Council. At least one member must be a Council member. Maple Ridge has nine committees of Council established by bylaw. While the committees are functioning in a similar manner there are some variations in procedures amongst the groups. The Committees of Council Policy will ensure that all committees are following the same procedures for appointing members and reporting to Council. As well, the policy outlines what the expectations are for both Council and committee members, how requests for new committees will be assessed and how membership will be determined. The roles of Council appointees and staff liaisons, if applicable, are detailed in the policy. The policy identifies that committees will report directly to Council and will provide a report on their activities at least twice a year. Committees will be expected to submit an annual Business plan that is in alignment with Council's strategic directions. (��, -, NY &-- Prepared by: Ceri Marlo, C.M.C. Manager of Legislative Services App oved by: Paul Gill, B.B.A, C.G.A, F.R.M C) General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services Concurren J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer /cm V Page 1 of 1 1201 Deap Ruts Gres:er Netgh:s Title: Committees of Council See also Council and Staff Liaison Roles Policy No. 3.10 Authority: ® Legislative ❑ Operational Approval: ® Council ❑ CMT ❑ General Manager Policy Statement: POLICY MANUAL Policy No : Supersedes: Effective Date: Review Date: 2012 Advisory committees/commissions/panels, and task forces provide opportunities for citizens to become more actively involved in their community, and for issues to be considered in depth. The Council of the District of Maple Ridge will appoint advisory committees/commissions/ panels and task forces to: • Provide information and advice to Council and staff on issues of concern to the public and the District which Council will consider in its decision making • Educate and raise the awareness of Council and staff; and • Provide concrete recommendations for consideration by Council and staff. Unless authority to make decisions has been delegated by Council to a Committee or Commission by bylaw, it is not the role of these bodies to establish policy, but to act in an advisory capacity to Council. The decision -making responsibility and authority remains with Council. Purpose: To establish guidelines for the formation and operation of Committees of Council. Definition: Committees - Advisory committees, commissions and panels that provide on -going advice of a policy nature. Committees may also include Task Forces that have responsibility to consider issues within a bounded time period. Once finished their work, task forces cease to exist. Selection Committee - A committee comprised of the Mayor and/or the applicable committee Council appointee(s) and staff liaison(s), if appointed, that reviews applications for committee positions, interviews selected applicants and makes recommendations to Council on appointed positions. Page 1 of 6 KEY AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY: Action to Take Responsibility 1. Functions The functions of the committees of Council are to: a) respond to issues referred by Council and staff; b) listen to and report on the community's views; c) gather necessary facts, information, and opinions; d) educate and raise the awareness of Council and staff; e) in the case of advisory committees/commissions/panels, offer longer term visions of the community;; f) provide advice and recommendations to Council and staff; g) raise issues to Council and staff that need to be addressed further. 2. Council Expectations Committees are expected to: a) respond to the issues referred by Council and by staff; b) within their mandates, raise issues to Council and staff that committee members believe need to be addressed; c) give well -considered and timely responses to Council's need for advice; d) work within the strategic directions as outlined in Council's annual business plan; e) prepare an annual business plan (excluding task forces); f) carry out their work effectively, efficiently, and creatively. 3. Committee Expectations Committees can expect from Council and staff: a) Sufficient information on the issues being addressed; b) consistent and effective staff support (where provided), within the budgetary limits of the district; Council c) orientation and training; d) prompt feedback on the outcomes of their advice and Staff recommendation; e) a commitment from Council to refer issues for committee Council consideration as they arise. 4. Committee Opportunities Committees can expect opportunities to: a) learn more about their community, and the issues that need to be addressed; b) engage with other people in dialogue and debate about the community and its issues; c) create broad visions of the community over the longer term; d) make concrete recommendations to Council and staff. Council acknowledges that it is vital that committee members feel that they are making a real difference in the life of their community. Page 2 of 6 5. Governing Legislation Committees will be governed by the bylaw (if any) of the particular committee, the Council Procedure Bylaw and applicable provincial and federal legislation. 6. New Committee In considering a new committee, Council will ask: a) What work needs to be done, or what issues need to be considered by the committee? b) Is the work on -going, or of a more time limited nature? What are the timelines? c) Is there a need for public involvement? Why? Who needs to be involved? d) Are there existing groups within the District or the community who could undertake the work or consider the issues? e) What is the capacity for funding the committee and providing staff support? In addition, Council will give consideration to the make up of the committee in terms of skills, expertise, and the diversity of interests required. 7. Membership Membership of committees of Council will be diverse, and broadly reflective of the community (for example: age, gender, cultural background, occupation, and neighbourhood, where appropriate). Membership of some committees will also reflect the desired experience, knowledge and expertise. Unless otherwise specified in a Committee's bylaws or terms of reference, members at large must reside or be employed in the District and membership will be limited to no more than three terms to permit others the opportunity to contribute. 8. Appointment of Members at Large Opportunities for citizen participation on the committees of Council will be advertised in a local newspaper, on the District web site, on any other media deemed appropriate by the Selection Committee and through community associations, where appropriate, so that any citizen who is interested can apply. Candidates will be requested to submit an email or letter of application providing information on their qualifications for the position. Even when a sitting member's term is up and they have indicated a willingness to continue their participation, others should be given the opportunity to apply and be considered alongside the sitting member. This is the only time that Committee/Commission members are evaluated in terms of their involvement and Council should have the opportunity to determine if other citizens should be appointed because their Council Clerk's Department Page 3 of 6 background and skill set is more suitable to the upcoming work of the Committee/Commission. Members of Council may nominate individuals whom they know are interested in serving on a respective committee. Such nominees are to be advised that they will be required to follow the same application procedures as others and will be assessed against other candidates who have responded to the advertisings. The Clerk's Department will prepare an alphabetical list of applicants that will specify where an individual is a sitting member of another Committee. If an individual applies for more than one Committee, the Clerk's Department will identify with the applicant the most appropriate Committee. Applications will be reviewed by the Selection Committee to determine if an interview process is required and who will be interviewed. Generally an interview will be required even if there is only one candidate to ensure the candidate is suitable for the position. Interviews should also be conducted if a sitting member has reapplied and others have applied so that fair consideration can be given to all candidates. The Clerk's Department will arrange the interviews. Following the interviews, the Selection Committee will forward a report to a Closed meeting of Council with their recommendations for appointment to the Committee. The report is to be accompanied by resumes of the candidates under consideration. Council will vote to appoint members to the committee and announce the results at a subsequent Regular Council meeting. The term of the appointment will be specified in the resolution. A full orientation will be provided to new committee members. Council may remove a member at any time. In general, it is the policy of Council not to appoint any individual to serve on more than one committee simultaneously. It is the intent of Council to afford the opportunity for as many interested citizens as possible to serve on Committees. 9. Conflict of Interest A conflict of interest exists where: a) a committee member is a director, member or employee of an organization seeking a benefit from the District of Maple Ridge upon which the committee will make a recommendation; b) the committee member has a direct or indirect pecuniary interest in the outcome of committee deliberations. A conflict of interest does not exist if: Clerk's Department Selection Committee Clerk's Department Selection Committee Council Page 4 of 6 a) the pecuniary interest of the member is a pecuniary interest in common with members of the municipality generally, or b) the pecuniary interest is so remote or insignificant tha- cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to influence tl' member in relation to the matter. Where a conflict of interest exists, committee members: a) are not entitled to participate in the discussion of the matter or to vote on a question in respect of the matte b) must declare to the committee that a conflict exists; ai c) must absent themselves from the meeting during consideration of the issue to which the conflict relates The member's declaration of a conflict and their exit from return to the meeting shall be noted in the minutes. Where a perceived conflict of interest might exist, the mer may note that a perception of conflict might exist but need not declare a conflict and exit the meeting if in the member's view there is no actual conflict of interest. Where in the opinion of a committee a member is in a conflict of interest and has not so declared, the committee may ask for a review of the matter by the Corporate Officer. The matter, if unresolved, may then be referred for Council review. 10. Council Appointee Council will appoint at least one Council member and an alternate to the Committee. The role of the appointee includes: a) ensuring that Council is adequately briefed as to the Council Appointee development of issues; b) communicating Council's position and policy; c) facilitating a clear and open dialogue between Council and the community committee; d) clarifying when they are stating their personal opinions. See also Council and Staff Liaison Roles Policy No. 3.10 11. Staff Liaison The Chief Administrative Officer may provide staff support on a case -by -case basis. The role of staff in supporting committees of Council includes: Staff Liaison a) providing information and professional advice; b) supporting the chairperson in developing agendas, arranging meetings, and promoting effective committee functioning; c) assisting with the preparation reports to Council; d) assisting with the creation of the annual Business Plan; Page 5 of 6 e) providing an annual orientation to Committee members on the work of the committee, the structure of the District, and Council's annual Business Plan and budgeting process. 12. Reporting The committees of Council are appointed by and report directly to Council. a) They are consultative groups. b) Council has the responsibility for making final decisions. c) Committee members will not misrepresent themselves as having any authority beyond that delegated by Council. 13. Reporting to Council When responding to an issue that was referred by Council, Committee committees will submit reports directly to Council. Committees will report to Council on their activities at least twice a year either in writing or by appearing as a delegation at a meeting of Council. 14. Annual Business Reports The committees of Council, with the exception of Task Forces, will annually submit a Business Plan to Council that is in alignment with Council's strategic directions. The format of the plan and timelines for submissions will be provided to the committees. 15. Minutes Committee minutes, which record the decisions made at meetings, will be submitted to the Clerk's Department. Council and the Chief Administrative Officer will consider providing clerical support on a case -by -case basis. Page 6 of 6