The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2011-03-08 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA March 8, 2011 7.00 p.m. Council Chamber MEETING DECORUM Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be reprimanded. Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 MOMENT OF REFLECTION Pastor Rod Shearing, Highway Church 300 INTRODUCTION OFADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS 400 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 500 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 501 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February 22, 2011 502 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of February 21 and 25, 2011 and March 1, 2011. Page 1 Council Meeting Agenda March 8, 2011 Council Chamber Page 2 of 6 600 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 700 DELEGATIONS 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 900 CORRESPONDENCE 1000 BYLAWS Bylaws for Final Reading 1001 RZ/022/09, 23300 and 23400 136th Avenue Staff report dated March 8, 2011 recommending final reading. 1001.1 Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6699-2009 To designate from Low Density Urban, Open Space and Conservation to Conservation Medium/High Density. Final reading 1001.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6700-2009 To rezone from kS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Densityl Residential) to permit future subdivision of 21 single family lots. Final reading 1002 Maple Ridge Revitalization Tax Exemption Bylaw No. 6789-2011 To establish a revitalization tax exemption program Final reading 1003 Maple Ridge Public Parks Liquor Consumption Amending Bylaw No_ 6792-2011 To permit the process for applying for a beer garden at large events in Memorial Peace Park more efficient to administer in the future. Final reading Council Meeting Agenda March S, 2011 Council Chamber Page 3of6 COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1100 Minutes - February 21, 2011 The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting. Public Works and Development Services 1101 RZ/091/10, 24371 112th Avenue, RS-3 to RS-1b and R-1 Staff report dated March 7, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6770-2011 to permit subdivision into 55 residential properties be given first reading, and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A-H of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1102 DVP/022/09, 23300 and 23400 136th Avenue, RS-3 to RS-1b Staff report dated March 7, 2011 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/022/09 to vary the front yard setback. 1103 SD/081/06, 5% Money in Lieu of Parkland Dedication 236th Street and 134th Avenue Staff report dated March 7, 2011 recommending that the developer pay an amount not less than $39,200. Council Meeting Agenda March 8, 2011 Council Chamber Page 4 of 6 1104 Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 142/10 21434121St Avenue Staff report dated March 7, 2011 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 142/10. 1105 Award of Contract No. 1TT-EN10-199 Kanaka Creek Watermain at Lougheed Highway Staff report dated March 7, 2011 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute contract ITT-EN10-199 with Directional Mining and Drilling Ltd. Financial and Corporate Services (includin0 Fire and Police) 1131 Award of Contract for Legal Services Staff report dated March 7, 2011 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and execute contracts for provision of labour law services with Heenan, Blaikie and for provision of municipal law services with Young Anderson. 1132 Disbursements for the month ended January 31, 2011 Staff report dated February 21, 2011 recommending that disbursements for the month of January, 2011 be approved. Community Development and Recreation Service 1151 Official Community Plan Amendment, 23711 132 Avenue Staff report dated March 7, 2011 recommending that direction be given to amend the OCP to remove a neighborhood park designation from a northern portion of the property at 23711 132 Avenue, and that a southern portion of the neighboring parcel, already owned by the District, be designated as neighborhood park. Council Meeting Agenda March S, 2011 Council Chamber Page 5 of 6 1181 Correspondence Other Committee Issues 1200 STAFF REPORTS 1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL From the February 21, 2011 Closed Council Meeting • Agricultural Advisory Committee - Term Appointments 2011-2012 1400 MAYOR'S REPORT 1500 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS 1600 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 1700 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING 1800 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC 1900 ADJOURNMENT Council Meeting Agenda March 8, 2011 Council Chamber Page 6 of 6 QUESTION PERIOD The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes. Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the information required to provide a complete and accurate response. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings, delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca. Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca. Checked by Date: CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES February 21, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary 1. MacDOUGALL, MICHAEL & CARRIE LYNN LEGAL: Lot 30, Section 3, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP35192 LOCATION: 24216 103A Avenue OWNER: Michael & Carrie Lynn MacDougall REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Covenant -Infiltration THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO MICHAEL & CARRIE LYNN MacDOUGALL. Ernie Da irh, Chair CARRIED 1 J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 502 N00 000OON 00 0) r- T- N�N ( It r N r N r N r N '— N N6 N N N CV N N N N N N It N 1 2 3 4 .) 8 9 10 11 cn 22 21 20 19 C18 216 15 14 13 12 m N r N m 00 CIDLO r 0) co Cm ` 0) LID Ln N N N N d N N N N N It N N N N N co 0 103 A AVE. 38 N 00 (0 O (0 N 00 (0 O (0 N 00 N N 00 m O O O T-' N N co co r r r- r r N IF d' It 11, 't ,I- 'C f Cr 't � Ct �1- N N N N N N N N N N N N 130131 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 32 33 34 P41519 BCP 35192 PARK PARK r PARK PARK CD BCP 9309 N LMP 35918 103 AVE. 10298LO CI t f Pitt Mea ows._ ' " iC: 24216 103A Ave Infiltration Covenant o CORPORATION OF 11 I � THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE , . . N District of Langley LICENSES, PERMITS &BYLAWS DEFT. DACE: Feb 17, 2011 FILE: BY: RO SCALE 1:1,000 c FRASER R. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES February 25, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. RZ/022/09 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lots 3 & 4, both of Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 2409 23300 & 23400 136 Avenue 0871933 B.C. Ltd. Rezoning Development Agreement Covenants: Geotechnical; Wildfire THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO RZ/022/09. CARRIED J.L. jjn�) Rule,Chief Administrative Officer Meer i N 200' 9 1 q 3 a_ 9 136 AVM. P 2409 P 2409 3 4 6 SUBJECT PROPERTIES 26 P 20636 LMP 46 J8 1 City of Pitt L I Meadows j=•- 23300 & 23400 136 AVENUE M 4 CORPORATION OF t5 THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE District of ', � -� I, °i =j.__, _L , � l { ' Langley I —�- �� I f° PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE :2.500 DATE: Apr 30, 2009 FILE: RZ1022/09 BY: PC �: FRASER R. f ��' CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES March 1, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. SD/116/08 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Jo -Anne Hertzog Acting Recording Secretary Lot 4, Section 32, Township 12, Plan BCP43237 13819 - 232 Street Insignia Homes Brighton Ltd. Subdivision Strata Plan - Phase 5 THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO SD/116/08 CARRIED J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Mern4r - -- 3907 139 AVE 35 ---- - o r��. h 9 ro N o -- - - -- N 8 n 7 6 3901 FORE ti n �s Rem 46 13895 PaJE s R3 47 g877 PEtJt P� a $ o y yBC 3856 N o ° 2 48 13871 VISTA RIDGED RIVE o 40 41 42 43 44 45 A c49 39 B P 1 328 46 47 48 50 51 49 138fi3 a a N 37 39 CP 1 328 50 13359 9 1 36 10 51 i3855 N 11 2 21 20 19 18 17 RCP 12 338 1313as1 13 r 52 24 23 N2N16 i15 25 o N w 090 BCP 43237 _D Pi 2 13762 1 13752 1 a ti 2 32 City of Pitt _ Meadows j_"I C 13819 232 STREET -— �� CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF ;V N ,t MAPLE RIDGE District of �'1; 1 Langley �I - PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2.500 -1 F�J DATE: Jun 3, 2010 FILE: 5D/112108 BY: KK -.. FAASER A. MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Greater Heights T0: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: March 8, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/022/09 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: COUNCIL SUBJECT: Final Reading: Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6699-2009 Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6700-2009 23300 and 23400136 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Bylaws 6699-2009 and 6700-2009 have been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently were granted Third Reading on February 23, 2010 and granted First Extension on February 22, 2011. The applicant has requested that Final Reading be granted. The purpose of the rezoning is to permit future subdivision of 21 single family lots, zoned RS-1b (One Family Urban -Medium Density Residential). RECOMMENDATION: That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6699-2009 be adopted; and That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6700-2009 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on February 16, 2010. On February 23, 2010 Council granted Third Reading to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6699-2009 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6700-2009 with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed: i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Amendment to Schedule "C" of the Official Community Plan; iii. Amendment to Part VI A of the Silver Valley Figure 2 - Land Use Plan and Part VI A of the Silver Valley Figure 4 -Trails/Open Space Plan and Part VI A of the Silver Valley Figure 5 - Transportation network Plan; iv. Registration of a Geotechnical Report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; V. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant which addresses recommendations to mitigate wild fire hazards for the proposed development; vi. Registration of a No -Build/ No -Disturb Restrictive Covenant on the rear yards of all the newly created lots, including all the lands on the eastern edge forming part of Lot 21; vii. A Statutory right of way plan and agreement for the Equestrian/Horse Trail must be registered at the Land Title Office: viii. Consolidation of the development site; ix. Road dedication as required; X. Park dedication as required, including construction of walkways and Equestrian/ Horse Trail. 1001 The following applies to the above: 1. Items i, iv, v, viii, ix and x have been completed and are being registered in the Land Title Office, as per the Letter of Undertaking from the applicant's solicitor; 2. Items ii and iii above will be completed after final approval of this application; 3. Item vi above, has been included as a condition of the Preliminary Letter of Approval and will be executed concurrently with the subdivision plan as the new legal descriptions will be created only after final approval of the Subdivision Plan; 4. Item vii has been executed; b) Additional Information: The property recently changed hands and the new developer had to seek extension as the one year time limit after Third Reading was up. Council granted First Extension with the same conditions listed above. The applicant is seeking variances for front yard setbacks and the 1361h Avenue section north of subject site remaining a closed road and the Development Variance Permit report is being considered by Council at this Council Meeting. Item v above is an interim measure to deal with developments within the wild fire interface area with an intention of not delaying any projects until adoption of the Wild Fire Development Permit Guidelines. CONCLUSION: The proposal is for a single family neighbourhood surrounded by conservation area and good pedestrian connectivity through the multi -purpose trail. It promises adequate restoration and enhancement works including dedication of 60% of the land as "park" and a north -south Equestrian Trail connection from the property on the south of subject sites. Some variances are proposed. As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that Final Reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6699-2009 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6700-2009. Prepared by: Rasika Acha a, B-Arch, M Tech, LID, LEED® AP Planner ° Approved by: j ne Pickering, MCP, MCIP Director Pla xlog r Approved by: : Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng G Publi orks & Development Services Concurrence: J. L. Jim) Rule Chi f Administrative Officer The following appenclVes are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Bylaw No. 6699-2009 Appendix C - Bylaw No. 6700-2009 M N200'9 Appendix A 3 o a I i iT 9 HAVE I I I I P 2409 P 2409 3 4 5 i t SUBJECT PROPERTIES I Nl 11. LMP 41 PA P 26077 26 29 P 20636 LMP46 8 13436 13425 13420 PAR 536_ 20 19 0 _ - -- City of Pitt j Meadows 23300 & 23400 136 AVENUE 'U) CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF jo MAPLE MAPLE RIDGE N District of "u;� •-� PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley r r SCALE 1:2,500 --—_--_.-_Jr. DATE: Apr 30, 2009 FILE: RZ1022/09 BY: PC FRASER R, _ -- Appendix B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6699-2009 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Section 10.3 Part IV - Silver Valley Area Plan, Figures 2, 3B and 4 of the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple.Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6699-2009 2. Figures 2 and 313 are hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 Section 28 Township 12 Plan 2409 New Westminster District. And Lot 4 Section 28 Township 12 Plan 2409 New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 787, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby redesignated as shown. 3. Figure 4 is hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 Section 28 Township 12 Plan 2409 New Westminster District. And Lot 4 Section 28 Township 12 Plan 2409 New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 788, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the 26t� day of January, A.D. 2010. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the 161h day of February, A.D. 2010. READ A SECOND TIME the 23rd day of February, A.D. 2010. READ A THIRD TIME the 23rd day of February, A.D. 2010. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER 1001.1 MAPLE RIDGE OFFfCIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6699-2009 Map No. 787 From: Low Density Urban, Open Space and Conservation TO: Conservation ® Med/High Density Residential 1 :2500 1 200' 9 930 hq, rn o / I 4 p. r- ER 76495 136 AVE. 2.023 ha. I 2 P 2409 P 2409 3 4 5 u, 3.921 h.. 2.023 ha. a 2.023 1.720 ha, P 26077 BCP 42355 26 PARK 9 0.619 he MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN Bylaw No. 6699-2009 AMENDING . Map No. 788 PURPOSE: TQ ADD TO CONSERVATION ON FIGURE 4 LH 1:2500 Appendix C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.6700-2009 A'Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. 2 3. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6700-2009." Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 Section 28 Township 12 Plan 2409 New Westminster District. And Lot 4 Section 28 Township 12 Plan 2409 New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1465 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 26th day of January, A.D. 2010. PUBLIC HEARING held the 16th day of February, A.D. 2010. READ a second time the 23rd day of February, A.D. 2010. READ a third time the 23rd day of February, A.D. 2010. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER , A.D. 200. CORPORATE OFFICER 1001.2 4 o' 2.023 hc. EP 79495 - P 2409 136 AVE. P 2409 3 4 5 3.921 ha. 2.023 ha. 2.023 h4 if7 Q P LEA '.720 hc- SCP 42355 PARK P 26077 26 0.619 hc. 9 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6700-2009 Map No, 1465 From: RS-3(One Family Rjrol Residential) To: RS-1 b(One Family Urban(mediurn density)Residential) l:2500 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Bylaw No. 6789 - 2011 A Bylaw to establish a revitalization tax exemption program WHEREAS Council may, by bylaw, establish a revitalization tax exemption program to encourage various types of revitalization to achieve a range of economic, social and environmental objectives, pursuant to the Community Charter; AND WHEREAS Council has given notice of the proposed Bylaw in accordance with the Community Charter, NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: PART 1 CITATION 1.1 This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Bylaw No. 6789 - 2011". PART 2 SEVERABILITY 2,1 If any part, section, subsection, clause, or sub clause of this Bylaw is, for any reason, held to be invalid by the decision of a Court of competent jurisdiction, such decision does not affect the validity or the remaining portions of this Bylaw. PART 3 DEFINITIONS 3.1 In this Bylaw: "Alternate/Renewable Energy" for the purposes of this bylaw, means energy that does not consume non-renewable resources, and is not provided by BC Hydro. The intent is to support the use of alternative, renewable energy sources. Examples include solar, wind, water, geothermal, and biomass; "Apartment or Mixed Use Building" means a building with a range of uses, including a residential building(s) on a lot with three or more dwelling units and/or a building(s) with residential, commercial and office uses that are co -located in an integrated way; "Building Permit" means a District of Maple Ridge building permit; "Building Permit Value" means the Construction value as stated on a printed building permit; "Commercial" means a land use that includes retail sales, wholesale, small-scale manufacture or assembly, service industry, or office. Examples range in size from small storefronts to shopping centres, hotels, and office buildings; Page 1 of 6 1002 "Commercial Fagade Improvement" means the renovation, restoration or redesign of a commercial buildingfagade/storefront located within the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association area; "Commercial Renovation" means the work regulated by the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw by the process of altering a building or portion thereof, to improve its functionality or performance beyond a level which currently exists. These improvements may also be termed as addition, landlord improvement and tenant improvement, but shall not include repair; "Council" means the Municipal Council of the District of Maple Ridge; "Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association" means the non-profit organization that represents businesses and property owners within a specific area of the Town Centre of Maple Ridge; "LEED"ilver" means a specific level of attainment according to the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating SystemT111 which is a consensus based national standard for developing high performance sustainable buildings; "Municipal Property Tax" means the property taxes Council has imposed pursuant to Schedule A of the Maple Ridge Tax Rates Bylaw, and does not include any other property taxes; "Non -Market Change" means the change as determined by BC Assessment under the Assessment Act, to the improvements portion of a parcel's assessed value, after issuance of a building permit for construction that is eligible under Part 6 of this Bylaw, that is not due to real estate market fluctuations or conditions; "Owner" means a person registered in the Land Title and Survey Authority's records as owner of land or of a charge on land, whether entitled to it in the person's own right or in a representative capacity or otherwise, and includes a registered owner; "Parcel" means a lot, block or other area in which land is held or into which land is subdivided; "Program" means the program established by Maple Ridge Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Bylaw No. 6789 - 2011; "Project" means a project as outlined in Part 6 of this Bylaw, and does not include any construction that is outside the scope of this Bylaw; "Storey" means that portion of a building which is situated between the top of any floor and the top of the floor next above it, and if there is no floor above it, that portion between the top of such floor and the ceiling above it. "First storey" means the uppermost storey having its floor level not more than two metres above grade. "Basement" means a storey or storeys of a building located below the first storey. "Building height (in storeys) means the number of storeys contained between the roof and the floor of the first storey. Refer to the BC Building Code for the most current definition - if there is a discrepancy, the 8C Building Code shall prevail; "Tax Exemption" means a revitalization tax exemption pursuant to this Bylaw. Page 2 of 6 PART 4 ESTABLISHMENT OF TOWN CENTRE INVESTMENT INCENTIVE AREAS AND A REVITALIZATION TAX EXEMPTION PROGRAM 4.1 Pursuant to the Community Charter, there is hereby established the Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas, namely Sub Area 1 and Sub Area 2, as outlined on Appendix "A", which is attached to and forms part of this Bylaw. Appendix "A" is a representation of the District of Maple Ridge Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas; if there is any discrepancy, the official version shall prevail. 4.2 Pursuant to the Community Charter, there is hereby established a Revitalization Tax Exemption Program for the Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas, providing a Revitalization Tax Exemption for Parcels with Projects meeting Program requirements. PART 5 PROGRAM REASONS AND OBJECTIVES 5.1 The District of Maple Ridge has made significant investments in the Town Centre over the last several years, in keeping with Council's vision to create a vibrant and dynamic Town Centre. An incentive program has been established to encourage accelerated private sector investment in residential and commercial projects to help achieve Council's vision, and this Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Bylaw is one element of that incentive program. 5.2 A Revitalization Tax Exemption Program is established under this Bylaw to: a. Encourage residential investment to diversify housing options, to increase density in the Town Centre, and to provide a larger base of residents to support Commercial activities; b. Encourage Commercial investment to create a strong local economy and expand employment opportunities for citizens; Increase pedestrian traffic with added residential and Commercial activity, both to support local business, and to enhance safety; d. Encourage and support the use of environmentally sustainable building construction methods and materials, and encourage energy efficiency and alternative technologies. PART 6 ELIGIBLE PROJECTS 6.1 The Project must be situated on a Parcel located within the Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas: a. If a Parcel is situated in more than one Sub Area, it shall be defined as being included in Sub Area 1; b. If a Parce[ is situated partially within the Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas, it shall be defined as being included in the Sub Area within which it is partially located. 6.2 A Building Permit must have an issue date of not before Monday, January 10, 2011, and not after Monday, December 30, 2013, to qualify. Page 3of6 6.3 The Project must meet all Program criteria and comply with all applicable land use and other District of Maple Ridge regulations. 6.4 The Project must be one or more of the following types: Apartment or Mixed Use Building Construction of: 1. Four -storeys or higher occurring within Sub Area 1; or, 2. Five -storeys or higher occurring in Sub Area 2. b. New Commercial construction with a Building Permit Value greater than or equal to $1,000,000; C. Commercial Renovation with a Building Permit Value greater than or equal to $20,000; d. Commercial Facade Improvement with a Building Permit Value greater than or equal to $10,000; 1. The Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association will determine eligibility for those Commercial Facade Improvements where a Building Permit is not required. 6.5 LEEDS-Silver or better or Alternate/Renewable Energy Projects, pursuant to this Bylaw, must be certified as LEED®-Silver or use Alternate/Renewable Energy for 51% or more of its total energy consumption for the ongoing operation of the building. PART 7 TAX EXEMPTION 7.1 The terms and conditions upon which a Revitalization Tax Exemption Certificate may be issued are as set out in this Bylaw, the Revitalization Tax Exemption Agreement and the Revitalization Tax Exemption Certificate. 7.2 A Revitalization Tax Exemption Certificate shall apply to a Parcel after the following conditions are met: a. The Owner of the Parcel has met all applicable provisions of this Bylaw; b. The Owner of the Parcel has entered into a Revitalization Tax Exemption Agreement with the District of Maple Ridge; C. The Owner of the Parcel has met all terms and conditions as set out in the Revitalization Tax Exemption Agreement; and, d. The Owner has applied for a Revitalization Tax Exemption Certificate and a Revitalization Tax Exemption Certificate has been issued for the Parcel. 7.3 The Tax Exemption is equivalent to 100% of the Municipal Property Tax payable on the amount of Non -Market Change attributed to the Project, as specified in Part 6 of this Bylaw, and where all the conditions as stated in Part 7 of this Bylaw have been met: for a total of three years; or, Page 4 of 6 b. for a total of six years for LEED"ilver or better or Alternate/Renewable Energy Projects, pursuant to this Bylaw. 7.4 For a Tax Exemption to commence in a given year, an Owner must submit an Application for a Revitalization Tax Exemption Certificate to the District of Maple Ridge by October 1 of the preceding year. 7.5 A Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Certificate may be revoked by Council by means of any of the following infractions: The Owner breaches any covenant, condition or obligation as set out in the Revitalization Tax Exemption Agreement; b. The Parcel is put to any use that is not permitted or fails to meet any of the Project eligibility requirements as outlined in Part 6 of this Bylaw; C. The Owner breaches: 1. Any enactments, laws, statutes, regulations and orders by any authority having jurisdiction, including bylaws of the District of Maple Ridge; 2. Any federal, provincial, municipal, and environmental licences, permits and approvals. 7.6 For a Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Certificate that is revoked due to the infractions noted in Part 7, Section 7.5 of this Bylaw, the District of Maple Ridge may recapture the value of the Tax Exemption provided on the Parcel, for the current and any previous taxation years to which the Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Certificate applies. Failure on the part of the Owner to remit the recapture amount within thirty (30) days will result in the amount being placed on the general property tax bill for the Parcel. READ A FIRST TIME this 8th day of February, 2011. READ A second time this 8th day of February, 2011. READ A third time this 8th day of February, 2011. RECONSIDERED and ADOPTED this day of 2011. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Attachment: Appendix "A" - Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas Page 5 of 6 �! '�A i�� 77 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6792-2011 A Bylaw to further amend Maple Ridge Public Parks Liquor Consumption Bylaw 2961-1981 as amended. WHEREAS the Council has by bylaw (in accordance with the Liquor Control and Licencing Act) designated certain public parks as a place where liquor may be consumed and wishes to amend the bylaw; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to further amend Maple Ridge Public Parks Liquor Consumption Bylaw No. 2961-1981 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Public Parks Liquor Consumption Amending Bylaw No. 6792-2011". 2. That the first paragraph be amended by removing the specific section of the Liquor Control and Licencing Act that gives the District jurisdiction over where liquor may be consumed. 3. That Section 2 is hereby amended by adding the following: "(m) Memorial Peace Park" READ a first time the 22nd day of February, 2011. READ a second time the 22rd day of February, 2011. READ a third time the 22nd day of February, 2011. RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of 2011. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1003 Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6770 - 2010 24371112 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: March 7, 2011 RZ/091/10 C of W An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (Urban Residential District) Zone and R-1 (Residential District) Zone to permit subdivision into 55 residential properties. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6770-2010 be given First Reading; and That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule (A-H) of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: CIPE Homes Inc. Owner: Joanne H Montgomery Ronald J Montgomery Lillian J Montgomery Legal Description: Lot: 1, Section: 15, Township: 12, Plan: 7709 OCP: Existing: Low -Medium Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-1b (Urban Residential District) R-1(Residential District) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Rural Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation Agricultural South: Use: 112 Avenue, beyond which Single Family Rural Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation 1101 East: Use: Single Family Rural Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation West: Use: Single Family Rural Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Project Description: Background Single Family Rural Residential, Agricultural Single Family Urban Residential 3.76 HA (9.29 acres) 112 Avenue Urban On October 5, 2010 an application was submitted, proposing a rezoning from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Zone to R-2 (Urban Residential District) Zone to allow for future subdivision. Staff Report dated January 4, 2011 was prepared for Committee of the Whole on January 10, 2011. The staff recommendation from that report was "(t)hat Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6770 - 2010 not be given First Reading". At the Council Meeting on January 11, 2011 the application was deferred back to staff. Since that time the applicant has revised their proposal and reduced the overall density of the development. The applicant now proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (Urban Residential District) Zone and R-1 (Residential District) Zone to permit subdivision into 55 residential properties. The RS-1b (Urban Residential District) are proposed to be located along 112th Avenue and to the rear of the subject property. The RS- 1b lots to the rear of the property will act as a larger lot buffer to the agriculatural land to the north of the subject site. There is also parkland proposed alongthe northern boundary of the property, this will provide an additional buffer to the agricultural land. At this time the application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. If this application proceeds, a detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading, if applicable. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. c) Planning Analysis: Official Communily Plan: The property is designated Low -Medium Density Residential on the Albion Area Plan. The current proposal will require an Official Community Plan amendment to permit the R-1 (Residential District) Zone on the subject property. An OCP amendment will also be required for the parkland proposed for environmental conservation and agricultural buffer purposes. The OCP amendments will be the subject of a future report to Council. -2- Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (Urban Residential District) Zone and R-1 (Residential District) Zone to permit subdivision into 55 residential properties. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top of bank of all watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. d) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Parks Department; e) School District; The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. A preliminary review of the servicing requirements has been undertaken by the Engineering Department. Through this review it has been noted that the applicant may be required to carry out servicing upgrades to the existing sewer and water systems along 240th Street and to the water main along 112th Avenue. The Engineering Department will provide further review of servicing through the formal referral process between First and Second Reading. e) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B or Schedule C); 3. Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); 4. Complete Subdivision Application -3- The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is not in compliance with the Official Community Plan, however, justification has been provided to support an Official Community Plan amendment. It is, therefore, recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together with an Invitation to the public to comment. The application will be presented at Public Hearing should it be advanced to Second Reading. It is, therefore recommended that Council not require any additional consultation. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge's Approving Officer. Prepared by. Sarah Atkinson Planning Technician Approved by: � Jane Pickering, MCP, MCIP DirectorofNPlanning by: Frank Quinn, MBAR-P�.Eng GM: Public WoxF-s &AevelopmentServices r_0 Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule / Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6770 - 2010 Appendix C - Site Plan ME Appendix A r f J i 3 3 P 68166 P 77744 RM 11291 N m N P 6816 1 2 m 1 M 2 P 7774 N N 11235 N v SUBJECT PROPERTY C P 23217 I P 22387 A 1 P 7709 B P 23217 �a`� 1 �ry r 6452 a � � qq 112 AVE- r� � a 'a u N E 24371 112 AVENUE 1.0 o CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF Q MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Oct 5, 20i0 FILE: R7MI/10 BY: PO Appendix B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.6770 - 2010 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6770 - 2010." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 1 Section15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 7709 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1498 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), R-1(Residential District). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER PCI 16 RP 3 4 6 7 W 112 8 E 112 8 P 54432 P 1 848 P 7 09 P 7 09 EP 65964\V, 1 3 14 1111 P 50 596 1/ %f mf 3 P 28632 �J P 68166 I N P 77744 C I 16 P 23217 11282 f 11291 M 17 a 112 AVE_ P 45684 1126E r N P 7774 m P 22387 A P 68136 1 n y 2 !, 1 REM 18 1 2 P 77744 17 zaE B P 2132 P 23217 ^Qi 11218 N N ry P 6452 N 112AVE, 45 Rem 11 A IN P s1ao1 W EP 30021 I P 61001 2 I� P 43601 P 809 EP 15693 A I 3 I I I MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6770-2010 Map No. 1498 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: 0 R-1 (Residential District) ® RS-1 b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential N .. SCALE 1:31500 y.e Appendix C 1-0 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: March 7, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: DVP/022/09 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Cow SUBJECT:. Development Variance Permit 23300 and 23400136 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This application is in support of a future subdivision of 21 single family lots zoned RS-1b (One Family Urban -Medium Density Residential) zone. The rezoning application (RZ/022/09) received Third Reading on February 23, 2010 and First extension on February 22, 2011. The property has recently changed hands and the new developer has been working towards satisfying the conditions and therefore is requesting Final approval on rezoning which is anticipated to go to the Council Meeting of March 8, 2011 along with this report. Due to its proximity to the North Alouette River and be subject to a Watercourse Protection Developmo approval of the proposed Subdivision Plan. RECOMMENDATION: due to the existing topography, this application will nt Permit which will require approval prior to final That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/022/09 respecting property located at 23300 and 23400136 Avenue. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: David Laird of Damax Consultants Ltd Owner: 0871933 BC LTD Legal Description: Lot: 3; Sec: 28; TP: 12; NWD Plan: 2409; PID: 000-490- 911 and Lot: 4; Sec: 28; TP: 12; NWD Plan: 2409; PID: 000-490-890 OCP: Existing: Low Density Residential, Conservation and Open Space Proposed: Medium Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban Residential -Medium Density) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Road and Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation Low Density Residential, Conservation, Park and Open Space 1102 South: Use: Single Family Residential and road Zone: CD-1-99 (Comprehensive Development) Designation: Low & Medium Density Residential, Conservation and Open Space East: Use: Vacant (District owned lands) Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low Density Residential and Open Space West: Use: North Alouette River and Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Conservation, Open Space and Eco Clusters Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: 6.087 Hectares (15.04 acres) Access: Balsam Street (to be built with approval of subdivision on the south through SD/001/09) Servicing: Full Urban Companion Applications: RZ/022/09; SD/022/09 and DP/022/09 (Watercourse Protection Development Permit) Requested Variance: A 2.0m front yard setback variance for all the proposed 21 lots and to retain 136th Avenue segment north of the subject sites in the current condition. b) Project Description: The subject site consists of two vacant lots located south of 136th Avenue in the Silver Valley area and will require consolidation. The North Alouette River flows along the western boundary of the property. 21 single family lots in the RS-1b (One Family Urban Residential -Medium Density) zone have been proposed which are fairly deeper lots than the minimum lot depth required in the RS-1b (One Family Urban Residential -Medium Density) zone. Access to the proposed single family subdivision is through Balsam Street to be extended through a subdivision proposed on the south of subject sites. In general the site slopes down from east to west with steeper grades on the eastern and western edges of the property. Due to these steep sloped areas the rear yards of all the lots will have a "No - Build & No -Disturb Covenant" as a condition of the final Subdivision Plan approval. The No-Build/No- Disturb covenanted area is for slope protection and will be fenced off with post and rail fence and appropriate signage, so that the future owners are aware of it. This is the reason why the applicant is seeking a variance to the front yard setback i.e. to be able to push the building envelope with a smaller front yard and a usable backyard in between the house and the covenanted area. Any rezoning application is expected to upgrade all off -site servicing including roads. Particular to the location of this site, the 136th Avenue segment north of the subject sites is anticipated to remain an unopened road due to the existing excessive grades. Hence the applicant has requested a variance to retain 136th Avenue in the current condition (with no upgrades). c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is within the Silver Valley Area Plan which forms part of the Official Community Plan. The development of Silver Valley is based on principles associated with achieving a complete community with good pedestrian linkages. Within the Silver Valley Area Plan, the subject site falls outside the Forest Hamlet (east of 236th Street) and is designated "Conservation", "Low Density 2- Residential" and "Open Space". The proposed single family designation lines up with the Official Community Plan designation and the proposal in general must comply with the Silver Valley Area Plan policies. The conservation boundary will be adjusted after "park" dedication occurs through an amendmentto the Schedule C and the Silver valley Area Plan figures, of the Official Community Plan. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The mail -outs to inform residents of the proposed variances were mailed 10 days prior to the anticipated Council Meeting date. Concerned residents in the neighbourhood have had the opportunity to voice their opinions. e) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has no concerns with the proposed variance. Building Department: The Building Department has no concerns with the proposed variance. f) Alternatives: The new developer is working towards satisfying all the conditions of a Watercourse Protection Development Permit and the Preliminary Letter of Approval conditions for the proposed subdivision into 21 single family lots zoned RS-1b (One Family Urban Residential -Medium Density) through SD/022/09. Council approval is required for the Development Variance Permit as presented in this report prior to a Subdivision Plan being approved by the Approving Officer. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed variances do not negatively impact the neighbourhood. The variances are in support of a 21 lot single family subdivision surrounded by conservation area and good pedestrian connectivity through the multi -purpose trail. It promises adequate restoration and enhancement works including dedication of 60% of the land as "park" and a north -south Equestrian Trail connection from the property on the south of subject sites. It fits well with the neighbourhood and complies with the policies of the Silver Valley Area Plan. Prepared by: Rasika Acharo, B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED® AP lanner 64111 Approved by. J e Pickering, MCP, MCIP irectgr'of P nning Approved by: em: nk Quinn, MBA, P.En PuPtic Worm D veV ntServices Concurrence: J.L. (Ji Chief The following appendices Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Proposed Su Rule ` ministrative Officer attached hereto: ivision Plan -3- 1 636 City of Pitt Meadows s NDistrict of Langley SCALE 1:2,500 Appendix A r- 1•N o Y r ° i 23300 & 23400 136 AVENUE �t CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Apr 30, 2009 FILE: RZ/022/09 BY: PC Appendix B V Nay z Q 4 4- Z 22 �� M33 ti O z oC mI CL ■ -I� 'ice+�1�s Deep Roots Greater Heights DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: March 07, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: SD/081/06 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN.- C of W SUBJECT: 5% Money in lieu of parkland dedication (Legal: Lot 8; Sec 28; TP 12; Plan 2637; PID: 010-501-932 (no civic) 236th Street and 134th Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The above noted subdivision is subject to the provisions of the Local Government Act regarding parkland dedication or payment in lieu of dedication. It is recommended that Council require payment in lieu of parkland dedication for District owned property stated above (with no civic address). Applications RZ/081/06 and SD/081/06 are to rezone and subdivide part of District owned lands to exchange land for "park" (west of 2361h Street) in a location preferred by District. The "park" lot is being created through a subdivision application SD/019/10 which is Phase 2 of the Landmark Development Ltd. RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Council's policy regarding 5% Parkland Dedication or payment in lieu, be it resolved that the applicant/ developer of land proposed for subdivision at the above stated legal address (no civic address), under application SD/081/06, shall pay to the District of Maple Ridge an amount that is not less than $ 39,200.00. DISCUSSION: Policy 8 of the Official Community Plan states that in order to preserve watercourses, an owner of land being subdivided shall, at the option of Council either: 1. Provide park land or an amount not to exceed 5% of the land being subdivided in a location acceptable to Council; or 2. Pay to the Municipality an amount that equals the market value of up to 5% of the land that may be required for parkland purposes. Where there is a significant watercourse and the District has the ability to include ravines and watercourse protection areas into the public realm that area is dedicated Park. These areas provide for large vegetated areas in urban neighbourhoods that provide corridors for wildlife and passive park areas for residents. Where there is either no watercourse or the watercourse is deemed insignificant, 5% of the market value of the land is paid to the District. These funds are placed into a special 1103 Parkland Acquisition Reserve Fund, which enables the District to purchase areas deemed important for habitat protection but where the ability to achieve parkland through development is limited, such as the Blaney Bog. In this particular instance there is no watercourse present and it is, therefore, recommended that money in lieu of parkland dedication be provided. In keeping with past practice, the District has an appraisal for the 5% market value of the development site as District is the owner of the land currently. This appraisal is based on zoned but not serviced land. An opinion from an appraisal firm, Equity Valuation and Consulting Services Ltd. hired by the District (as we are the owners of the land under consideration) has stated that the market value of the land is $784,000.00, which indicates that the 5% value of this property is $39,200.00. This 5% value of the property; off -site servicing costs and the applicable Development Cost Charges, will be the responsibility of the developer for both the subdivision applications (SD/019/10 and SD/081/06) that will execute the land exchange. CONCLUSION: As there are no watercourses on the property it is recommended that Council require payment in lieu of parkland dedication as prescribed in the appraisal awl - Prepared by: Rasika Ach a, B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED® AP Plan 7A A prove bY.:"e P' erin , MCIP Dir , o Planning Approved by Frank Quinn MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & D 7entServices 1 4 Concurrence: . (Jim) Rule k of Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix 1 - Subject Property Map Appendix 2 - Proposed Subdivision Plan -2- P 2409 6 7 Rem 3 P 3007 T« �4 uG- 77 RP 1804A n15218 RAM PH { District of _ Pitt Meadows: j _i IHaney District of N Langley SCALE 1:3,000 Piver i1 SUBJECT PROPERTY a 1s �- 2365A 26 -o a� P �y 20 N {� 66y6 z366921 w1 Rem 2 LMP 35466 Appendix A 2 1 3 P P 7 I 6 1 '33901 es CO Q ,33i21 1, 1 16 j oyz 6°�'e 30 12 ^,o C 37333 3 —J 17 12^0 h 13 h 2�� 16 Q 13347 1335, 0 14 15 Q 3333 13346 °C A 19 10p "I 6'^ 13339 13336 $ Sj 13333 13332 sr. 12 13 Mi 7 13329 6�^oe QjL ^rye 6 11 7 ,`� ham' 5 13325 0 sham^ 10 1 �a n M 6 ,��'+ 13 21 13322 7 rn 5^� fs 4 9 15-, 4 7. 13317 Q 13318 a 44 45 2�1�e 3 8 1-16 a LMk 3 2j741 13313 M 13314 23.138 2 7 N 17 ,3742 23743 1 1113309 6 23745 133118 21 13306 2 133a5 23746 237A73 1330119 N ry 1 4 133 AVE. LOT 8, N/E 114, SECTION 28, TOWNSHIPP 12, PLAN 2637 I � 1 CORPORATION OF iU THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLERIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Aug 23, 2006 FILE: SD/081/06 BY: PC PROPOSED SUBDIVISIONEF L4N OFPLAN!5213LOTFIRSTLY, PARCEL A OF LO SECONDLY, PART SUBDIVIDED BY PLAN 65591 THIRDLY,, PART DEDICATED PARK ON PLAN LMP46668 FOURTHLY,,- PART SUBDIVIDED BY PLAN LMP47584 FIFTHLY; PART SUBDIVIDED BY PLAN BCP10664; SIXTHLY PART SUBDIVIDED BY PLAN BCP42355; AND OF PART OF LOT 8 PLAN 2637, SEC.28 TP.12 N.W.D. PLAN 3007 8CG.S 920 026 D. 0- !;p wlhin fM GMOIK Wncd�wr F�aieml fAsfrcf Y�nK:pp51 Scale Appendix B rer mr. a l iv. tea a Ai/1 Mae le+r S.�p � i4� rs4+ n aa.� fr.�rs a.elr tlN1 r q P'r'R a N /�aW�j rivM.Wr w vwy �d y u'. M atl wr w v.y ana 04' v. ar.st M RV! w�wr v m�YYYtl w� Iti nu pm .w nreYttl W tM�. w w •,w a ham. �e s..�:y wen aqy. e.e ar.'s+ F k19+� vnoA tpr-ras- ■6ritish Columbia MAPLE RIDGE District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 7, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: E05-121-001 & E01-052-001 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Excess Capacity/Extended Services Agreement LC 142/10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The developer of a property at 21434 121 Avenue was required to extend the storm sewer along 121 Avenue to serve the development. fart of the development servicing is considered to be excess or extended servicing in accordance with the Local Government Act. The extended servicing benefits adjacent properties. Latecomer Agreement LC 142/10 provides the municipality's assessment of the attribution of the costs of the excess or extended servicing to the benefiting lands. RECOMMENDATION: That with respect to the development of lands located at 21434 121 Avenue, be it resolved: 1. That the cost to provide the excess or extended services is, in whole or in part, excessive to the municipality and that the cost to provide these services shall be paid by the owner of the land being developed, and 2. That Latecomer Charges be imposed for such excess or extended services on the parcels and in the amounts as set out in the staff report dated March 7, 2011, and further 3. That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 142/10 with the developer of the said lands. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The attached map identifies the lands which are involved in the development and those which will benefit from the excess or extended services. The cost breakdown for each excess or extended service is shown on attached Schedule A. In addition, a copy of Excess Capacity Latecomer Agreement LC 142/10 is also attached for information purposes. 1104 104 b) Strategic Alignment: Administration of excess or extended services legislation complies with the Smart Managed Growth element of the Corporate Strategic Plan. The administration procedure supports the requirement for a developer to construct municipal infrastructure in support of land development and recognizes that the infrastructure may provide benefit to other land. c) Policy Implications: Part 26, Division 11, of the Local Government Act provides that where a developer pays all or part of the cost of excess or extended services, the municipality shall determine the proportion of the cost of the service which constitutes excess or extended service and determine the proportion of the cost of the service to be attributed to parcels of land which the municipality considers will benefit from the service. Latecomer Agreement LC 142/10 will provide such determination. CONCLUSION: A developer has provided certain services in support of development of his property. Some of the services benefit adjacent lands. Therefore, it is appropriate to impose Latecomer Charges on the benefitting lands. Latecomer Agreement LC 142/10 summarizes the municipality's determination of benefitting lands and cost attribution and also establishes the term over which such Latecomer Charges will be applied. Prepared by: Sti iphen Judd, PEng. M ager of Infrastructure Development Reviewed by: ndrew Wood, PhD., PEng. Munic'ipal.Engin r� Approved by: F ank Quinn, MBA,ng., 4V1: Publip Works &, gevelopment Services Concurrence: J.L: (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Schedule A TYPE OF EXCESS OR EXTENDED SERVICE 1. Off Site Normal Sized Services SERVICE # BENEFITTING COST OF LOTS BENEFIT COST PER BENEFIT LOT ATTRIBUTED BY PROPERTY EXCLUDING DEVELOPMENT SITE Storm Sewer 11 $125,290.00 $11,390.00 Lot 3, Plan 9922 RN 20982-0000-6 1 x $11,390.00 Lot 4, Plan 9922 RN 20983-0000-1 1 x $11,390.00 W 1/2 of Lot 28, Plan 7499 RN 42022-0000-7 1 x $11,390.00 E 1/2 of Lot 28, Plan 7499 RN 42023-0000-2 1 x $11,390.00 Lot C, Plan 19628 RN 42021-0300-2 1 x $11,390.00 Lot D, Plan 19628 RN 42021-0400-6 1 x $11,390.00 Rem. 6 Except E. 60' Plan 7499 RN 20979-0000-8 1 x $11,390.00 E. 60' of Lot 6, Plan 7499 RN 20979-0100-1 1 x $11,390.00 Lot 7, Plan 7499 RN 41997-0000-6 1 x $11,390.00 Lot 8, Plan 7499 RN 41998-0000-1 1 x $11,390.00 A total of all of the aforementioned services for each property is as follows: List Properties Amount of Benefit Lot 3, DL 248, Gp 1, Plan 9922, NWD $11,390.00 RN 20982-0000-6 Lot 4, DL 248, Gp 1, Plan 9922, NWD $11,390.00 RN 20983-0000-1 W 1/2 of Lot 28, DL 245, Gp 1, Plan 7499, NWD $11,390.00 RN 42022-0000-7 E 1/2 of Lot 28, DL 245, Gp 1, Plan 7499, NWD $11,390.00 RN 42023-0000-2 Lot C, DL 245, Gp 1, Plan 19628, NWD $11,390.00 RN 42021-0300-2 Lot D, DL 245, Gp 1, Plan 19628, NWD $11,390.00 RN 42021-0400-6 Rem. 6 Except E. 60', DL 248, Gp 1, Plan 7499, NWD $11,390,00 RN 20979-0000-8 E. 60' of Lot 6, DL 248, Gp 1, Plan 7499, NWD $11,390.00 RN 20979-0100-1 Lot 7, DL 245, Gp 1, Plan 7499, NWD $11,390.00 RN 41997-0000-6 Lot 8, DL 245, Gp 1, Plan 7499, NWD $11,390.00 RN 41998-0000-1 22 P 9922 CAMPBELL AVENUE 12167 72168 N —18 17 16 15 14� 13� 12�' 5 BEN FITTING 72153 PR PERTIES P 4973 P 7499 2 ..... ..... . E.'.1 /2 ........... 19. 6 2.E . . 00 ... ^ _.....�..._.: ...�...o� E REM .-......... �..� ......� 25 N N.. �. N.... ......... �......., LMP 29660 121 AVENUE 2 w 'Q0.......... .... ...... N 26 2 �2�T6 w ... .............. ............. 229 2 373 12106 N 4 P 7499 P 2146 65 6 . ... ....... 2095 31 12094 �_ 5 N \BENEFITTING DEVELOPMENT 093 PROPERTIES SITE 21 6 N CEP 22712 m 0-7c-_I DEVELOPMENT SITE BENEFITTING PROPERTY -O& CORPORATION OF THE N - DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE 128 AVE. - ENGINEERING n 23 AVE, y' IC DEPARTMENT yEM(11! Y MUN Rp. L ED n EXCESS CAPACITY/EXTENDED SERVICES AGREEMENT LC 142/10 100 ►YE. SCALE: LOU eeo k, N.T.S. BATE: OCTOBER 2010 FILE/DWG No LC 142-2010 EXCESS CAPACITY LATECOMER AGREEMENT LC 142/10 THIS AGREEMENT made the day of , 2011: BETWEEN: Mr. Ron Winick 21434121 Avenue Maple Ridge, BC V2X 3S4 (Hereinafter called the "Developer") AN D: OF THE FIRST PART CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under the "Municipal Act", having its offices at 11995 Haney Place, in the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia (Hereinafter called the "Municipality") WHEREAS: OF THE SECOND PART A. The Developer has developed certain lands and premises located within the Municipality of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia, and more particularly known and described as: Lot F, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 21461, NWD (Hereinafter called the "said lands") B. In order to facilitate the approval of the development of the said lands, the Developer has constructed and installed the storm sewer shown on the design drawings prepared by Hub Engineering Inc., Drawing No. 06046-2, 06046-3, 06046- 4, dated Nov 2006 and which were reviewed by the Municipality Mar. 30/07. (Hereinafter called the "Extended Services"); C. The extended services have been provided with a capacity to service the said lands and other than the said lands; ❑. The Municipality considers its cost to provide the Extended Services to be excessive; Page 1 of 4 E. The Developer has provided the Extended Services in the Amount of $125,290.00. F. The Municipality has determined that the following properties: Lot 3, District Lot 248, Group 1, Plan 9922, NWD; Lot 4, District Lot 248, Group 1, Plan 9922, NWD; West 1/2 of Lot 28, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 7499, NWD; East 1/2 of Lot 28, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 7499, NWD; .Lot C, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 19628, NWD; Lot D, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 19628, NWD; Rem. of Lot 6, District Lot 248, Group 1, Plan 7499, Except East 60 Feet, NWD; East 60 Feet of Lot 6, District Lot 248, Group 1, Plan 7499, NWD; Lot 7, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 7499, NWD; Lot 8, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 7499, NWD; (the "Benefitting Lands") will benefit from the Extended Services; G. The Municipality has imposed as a condition of the owner of the Benefitting Lands connecting to or using the Extended Services, a charge (the "Latecomer Charge") on the Benefitting Lands in the following amounts: Lot 3, District Lot 248, Group 1, Plan 9922, NWD • $11,390.00 for connection to the storm sewer constructed by the developer. Lot 4, District Lot 248, Group 1, Plan 9922, NWD $11,390.00 for connection to the storm sewer constructed by the developer. West 1/2 of Lot 28, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 7499, NWD $11,390.00 for connection to the storm sewer constructed by the developer. East 1/2 of Lot 28, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 7499, NWD $11,390.00 for connection to the storm sewer constructed by the developer. Lot C, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 19628, NWD • $11,390.00 for connection to the storm sewer constructed by the developer. Lot D, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 19628, NWD • $11,390.00 for connection to the storm sewer constructed by the developer. Rem. of Lot 6, District Lot 248, Group 1, Plan 7499, Except East 60 Feet, NWD • $11,390.00 for connection to the storm sewer constructed by the developer. East 60 Feet of Lot 6, District Lot 248, Group 1, Plan 7499, NWD • $11,390.00 for connection to the storm sewer constructed by the developer. Lot 7, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 7499, NWD • $11,390.00 for connection to the storm sewer constructed by the developer. Lot 8, District Lot 245, Group 1, Plan 7499, NWD $11,390.00 for connection to the storm sewer constructed by the developer. plus interest calculated annually from the date of completion of the Extended Services as certified by the General Manager - Public Works and Development Page 2 of 4 Services of the Municipality (the "Completion Date") to the date of connection by the Benefitting Lands to the Extended Services; H. The Latecomer Charge when paid by the owner of the Benefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality shall pursuant to Section 939 (7) of the Local Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 be paid to the Developer as provided for in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE AS AUTHORIZED BY Section 939 (9) of the Local Government Act R.S.B.0 1996, c. 323, The parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Latecomer Charge, if paid by the owner of the Senefitting Lands and collected by the Municipality within fifteen (15) years of the Completion Date shall be paid to the Developer and in such case payment will be made within 30 days of the next June 30th or December 31st that follows the date on which the Latecomer Charge was collected by the Municipality. 2. This Agreement shall expire and shall be of no further force and effect for any purpose on the earlier of the payment of the Latecomer Charge by the Municipality to the Developer, or fifteen (15) years from the Completion Date, and thereafter the Municipality shall be forever fully released and wholly discharged from any and all liability and obligations herein, or howsoever arising pertaining to the Latecomer Charge, and whether arising before or after the expiry of this Agreement. 3. The Developer represents and warrants to the Municipality that the Developer has not received, claimed, demanded or collected money or any other consideration from the owner of the Benefitting Lands for the provision, or expectation of the provision of the Extended Services, other than as contemplated and as provided for herein; and further represents and warrants that he has not entered into any agreement with the owner of the Benefitting Lands for consideration in any way related to or connected directly or indirectly with the provision of the Extended Services. The representations and warranties of the Developer herein shall, notwithstanding paragraph 2 of this Agreement, survive the expiry of this Agreement. 4. The Developer (if more than one corporate body or person) hereby agrees that the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to each corporate body or person in equal shares. 5. If the Developer is a sole corporate body or person, the Municipality shall remit the Latecomer Charge to the said sole corporate body or person, with a copy to the following (name and address of director of corporate body, accountant, lawyer, etc.): Page 3 of 4 6. In the event that the Developer is not the owner of the said lands, the owner shall hereby grant, assign, transfer and set over unto the Developer, his heirs and assigns, all rights, title and interest under this Agreement. Authorized Signatory - Developer The Corporate Seal of the CORPORAT[ON OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE was hereunto affixed in the presence of: Corporate Officer -Authorized Signatory Page 4 of 4 Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 7, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: E03-010-075 Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W Award of Contract No. ITT-EN10-199 Kanaka Creek Watermain at Lougheed Highway EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Kanaka Creek Watermain at Lougheed Highway Project, located on the south side of Lougheed Highway between the Haney Bypass and Tamarack Lane, is in the District's approved 2009 Capital Program. The project objective is to replace the existing aerial watermain crossing at Kanaka Creek. The existing timber support piles have deteriorated and one pile has been dislodged due to high creek flows. There is concern that over time the watermain could be comprimised. Four tender were received on January 18, 2011 for the construction contract which includes directional drilling approximately 110 meters of 450 mm diameter watermain under Kanaka Creek. The low compliant tender of $281,295.00 (excluding taxes) was submitted by Directional Mining and Drilling Ltd. Their tender has been checked and evaluated by Staff and the design consultant. Council approval to award the contract is required in order for the work to proceed and be completed before spring runoffs in the creek. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Contract ITT-EN10-199, Kanaka Creek Watermain at Lougheed Highway, be awarded to Directional Mining and Drilling Ltd. in the amount of $281,295.00 and THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The existing watermain on the south side of Lougheed Highway between the Haney Bypass and Tamarack Lane crosses over Kanaka Creek and is supported on wooden piles. One of the piles was dislodged during a spring runoff in the creek. There is concern that the other piles supporting the watermain could become affected, resulting in the compromise of the watermain. A design to replace the existing watermain by directional drilling under Kanaka Creek was completed by Paragon Engineering Ltd. in December, 2010. The construction contract was tendered and closed on January 18, 2011. 1105 105 Tender results Four tenders were received and opened in public, and are listed below from lowest to highest price. Tender Price(excluding taxes Directional Mining and Drilling Ltd. $281,295.00 Tritech Group Ltd. $281,951.77 Sandpiper Contracting LLP $307,150.00 Bel Contracting Ltd. $328,930.00 Paragon Engineering Ltd. has reviewed the tenders, concluded that Directional Mining and Drilling Ltd. is qualified to do the work, and recommended that the contract be awarded to them. Staff have also checked the tenders and concur with the recommendation. b) Desired Outcome It is desirable to award the contract and construct the Kanaka Creek watermain replacement before spring runoffs in the creek. c) Strategic Alignment: Replacement of the Kanaka Creek watermain crossing will ensure reliability and capacity of the water network servicing the River Road industrial area east of the Haney Bypass. This is in alignment with the strategic plan. d) Citizens/Customer Implications: Construction will commence soon after the project is awarded and attempts will be made to minimize the impact to everyday traffic, residents, and businesses in the neighborhood. e) Interdepartmental Implications: The Operations Department has provided input during the design stage. The construction of the works will be coordinated with the Operations Department including the existing water main tie-in. District inspectors will provide regular inspection of the works. f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: There is sufficient funding in the approved Capital Budget for the project. This includes $220,000 from Capital Project LTC No. 2166 and $228,000 from Capital Project LTC No. 1270 both funded from the water utility. CONCLUSIONS: The tender price of $281,295.00 excluding taxes, by Directional Mining and Drilling Ltd. for the Kanaka Creek Watermain at Lougheed Highway Project is the lowest tendered price. Council approval to award the work to Directional Mining and Drilling Ltd. is recommended. Prepared by: Richard W61nd, PEng. anager o sign & Construction Reviewed by: 1j Andrew Wood, PhD., PEng. Municipal Engineer Financial review by: i`evor hompson, CGA Manager- inancial Planning Approved by: `Frank Quinn MBA, PEng./ Geperal Manager: 1' iic Works & Development Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer RW/mi TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Award of Contract for Legal Services Committee of the Whole EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DATE: March i, 2011 9I1a►[9Ad►ZLINK The District contracts for legal services for labour law and municipal law with Harris and Co and Young Anderson have concluded and a competitive process was undertaken to award new contracts for those services. Nine firms submitted proposals to provide one or both of those services. Staff analyzed the submissions based on a 12 point criterion. Three firms were interviewed: Young Anderson for municipal law services; Heenan Blaikie for labour law services; and Bull Housser Tupper for labour and municipal law services. Staff is recommending that five year contracts, with provision for an additional five years at the sole discretion of .the District, be awarded to Heenan Blaikie for provision of labour law services and to Young Anderson for provision of municipal law services. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and execute contract s for provision of labour law services with Heenan, Blaikie and for provision of municipal law services with Young Anderson for a five year term with provision for an additional five years at the sole discretion of the District. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The District of Maple Ridge contracts out its requirements for legal services. In November 2010 a Request for Proposals was issued for provision of those services for the District's labour law and municipal law services. Of the nine firms who submitted proposals, three were short listed and interviewed. it is recommended that contracts be awarded to Heenan, Blaikie and Young Anderson. Over the last couple of years, the District has occasionally used Heenan Blaikie for "second opinions" and other specific questions on labour law matters. Young Anderson is well-known to the District and have provided legal services to the corporation for many years. Their rates and services compared favourably with the other proponents. 1131 Page 1 of 2 b) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The rates of Heenan Blaikie and Young Anderson are in line with the budget for legal services. Both firms will be providing staff with seminar opportunities and regular updates on changes in the law. c) Alternatives: The District could provide in-house legal services through a new staff position. This is not recommended as it is not likely to eliminate the requirement to outsource some of our legal requirements and such a position is not contemplated in the 2011-2015 Business Plan. CONCLUSIONS: Awarding contracts to Heenan Blaikie and You ng Anderson will enable the District to obtain legal advice from two very reputable firms. Awarding of contracts will not, however, preclude the District from obtaining advice from other firms on matters beyond their expertise. rj_� da"�' Prepared by: eri. Marlo Manager of Legislative Services and Emergency Program Prepared by: John b rn Executive Director to Chief Administrative Officer Approved by: Paul Gill, B.B.A., C.G.A., F.R.M. General Manager: Corporate @ Financial Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule ,Chief Administrative Officer r :cm Page 2 of 2 Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: February 21, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer Disbursements for the month ended January 31, 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council has authorized all voucher payments to be approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor and a Finance Manager. Council authorizes the vouchers for the following period through Council resolution. The disbursement summary for the past period is attached for information. Expenditure details are available by request through the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION: That the "disbursements as listed below for the month ended January 31, 2011 now be approved". GENERAL $ 6,152,974 PAYROLL $ 1,453,687 PURCHASE CARD $ 100,963 7,707,624 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan. b) Community Communications: The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial disbursements. 1132 c) Business Plan / Financial Implications: Hi hli hts of larger items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution • BC SPCA - Community Animal Centre development - 50% share $ 169,489 • Cubex Limited - Street sweeper $ 184,259 • Gr Vane Sewerage & Drainage - Jun-Dec'10 DCC collection $ 180,913 • Minister of Finance - 2010 school tax requisition $ 672,446 • Municipal Insurance Assoc -- 2011 Insurance assessment $ 331,792 • Receiver General - three payroll remittances $ 925,489 • Willis Canada Inc - 2011 property & all risk insurance $ 211,419 • Young Anderson, "In Trust" - Additional property acquisition costs $ 364,000 d) Policy Implications: Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice. CONCLUSIONS: The disbursements for the month ended January 31, 2011 have been reviewed and are in order. w - Prepared by: G'An R gg Accounting Clerk II Approved by: ` Tre or Thompson, CGA Manager of Financial Planning Tr Approved by: Paul Gi BBA,,CGA GM•- Corporate & Financial Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) kule r Chief Administrative Officer gmr CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - JANUARY 2011 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNT 0752281 BC Ltd Security refund 196,502 Active Network Ltd Class software maintenance fees 20,126 Aecom Canada Ltd 230 Street drainage 2,738 Albion Flats development 4,499 MREC feasibility study 5,568 River Road storm sewer 2,290 15,095 BC Hydro Hydro charges Jan 88,160 BC SPCA Community Animal Centre development- 50%share 169,489 BDO Canada LLP 2010 Financial statement audit 22,957 Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd Maintenance: Alco Park repairs 1,919 Banners 423 Davit Pole replacement 25,536 Downtown enhancement project 2,323 Inspect speed sign 212 Pedestrian sign 11,466 Street lights 22,116 Street light pole repairs 6,707 Traffic controller replacement 3,137 Works Yard circuit installation 9,607 Xmas lights 16,156 99,602 Bynett Construction Services RCMPjail cell renovations 76,646 CUPS Local 622 Dues - pay periods 10/26 & 11/01 20,424 Cascadia Sport Systems Inc Leisure Centre studio renovation 3.9,432 Chevron Canada Ltd Fuel Jan & Feb 127,415 City Of Coquitiam Housing prisoners 42,847 Cubex Limited Street sweeper 184,259 David Butcher Law Corporation Legal costs 40,988 Davies, John Tax refund 15,174 Fitness Edge Fitness classes & programs Jan 17,961 Future Systems Recycling depot collection equipment 15,065 Golder & Associates Albion Flats development 1,366 Kanaka Creek Road slope remediation 14,766 16,132 Gr Vanc Sewerage & Drainage Waste disposal 335 Jun - Dec'10 DCC collection 180,913 181,248 Hanks Trucking And Bulldozing 256 St gravel pit excavation 20,194 Storm sewer maintenance 141 20,335 Happy Heart Fitness & Educ Weight room supervision & childcare activity room 15,139 HB Lanarc Albion Flats concept plan 19,081 Igors Construction Ltd Leisure Centre tile project 16,666 1nprotect Systems Inc Pavement markers 2,974 Pavement patch 1,632 Traffic calming 22,028 26,634 Insignia Homes Silver Valley Security refund 57,019 Manulife Financial Employee benefits premiums 124,246 Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council Art Centre grant Jan 46,392 Program revenue Dec 14,799 Theatre rental 2,046 63,237 Maple Ridge Historical Society Quarterly fee for service payment 34,007 Medical Services Plan Employee medical & health premiums 29,720 Minister Of Finance 2010 school tax requisition 672,446 Municipal Insurance Assoc 2011 Insurance assessment 331,792 Insurance deductibles 4,459 336,251 Municipal Pension Plan BC Employee benefits premiums Panorama LMS 4011 Strata fees Jan & Feb Pitt Meadows Heritage & Museum Semi-annual fee for service Prestige Telecom Radio antenna & equipment Professional Mechanical Ltd Maintenance: Leisure Centre Municipal Hall Operations Pitt Meadows Heritage Randy Herman Building RCMP The Act Raincity Janitorial Sery Ltd Janitorial services Dec Firehalls Library Municipal Hall Operations Randy Herman Building RCMP Receiver General For Canada Employer/Employee remit PP10/26, PP11/01 & 11/02 RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ice rental Dec Curling rink operating expenses Nov & Dec Ridge Meadows Seniors Society Quarterly operating grant Jan - Mar Ridgemeadows Recycling Society Monthly contract for recycling Jan Weekly recycling Litter pick-up contract Rogers Cellular devices - Dec & Jan Surfwood Supply Bobcat with attachments Terasen Gas Natural gas Thistle Plumbing Limited Whonnock Lake Centre drain cleaning & v-cam inspections Warrington PCI Management Advance for Tower common costs Jan Tower expenses Dec Westridge Security Services Security services, Haney Wharf - Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep & Oct Municipal Hall Core park - Oct & Dec Willis Canada Inc 2011 Property and All Risk Insurance Wolf Electric Ltd Municipal Hall HV circuit breaker replacement Workers Compensation Board BC Employer/Employee remittance 4th qtr 2010 Young Anderson, "In Trust" Additional property acquisition costs Zoom Audio Visual Networks Inc Council chamber video/audio upgrade Disbursements In Excess $15,000 Disbursements Under $15,000 Total Payee Disbursements Payroll PP11/O1 & PP11/O2 Purchase Cards - Payment Total Disbursements January2011 GMR \\DOVE\CorpServ\Finance\Accounting\Accounts Payable\AP Remittances (Disbursements)\2011\[Monthly CouncH Report 2011.x1sx]JAN'11 30,288 27,972 959 377 1,367 2,314 3.81.'3 6,317 5,325 2,979 2,999 4,414 3,384 55,706 11,597 90,216 426 1 _7RR 50,000 15.429 5,749 571 10,194 307,875 19,300 37,446 21,837 67,090 25,418 925,489 67,303 47,474 92,428 18,396 45,119 34,375 22,508 65,482 16,515 211,419 44,688 70,541 364,000 26,128 5,315,132 837,842 6,152,974 1,453,687 100,963 7,707,624 MAPLE A Deep Roofs Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEETING: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer 23711-132 Ave C.O.W. DATE: March 7, 2011 FILE NO: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The District recently received an inquiry from a developer regarding the northern portion of the land at 23711- 132 Ave, (Plan number 48925) which is currently identified in the OCP as Neighborhood Park. The District Property and Risk Manager has attempted to purchase the land from the current owner in the past without success. RECOMMENDATION(S): That the OCP be amended to remove the neighborhood park designation from the northern portion of the property at 23711 132 Ave, and that southern portion of the neighboring parcel located at 23725 -- 132 Ave, which is already owned by the District, be designated as neighborhood park. a) Background Context: Previous attempts to acquire the portion of land identified in the OCP as Neighborhood Park have not been successful, and it is unknown when the property may become available for this purpose. The southern portion of the neighboring property to the East, is considered by staff to be more desirable as a neighborhood park site as it offers considerably more access for the residents of the area, and would not require significant tree removal to develop the park. The site can currently be accessed from the south off 132 Ave, as well as a public right of way access located on 237 A St. A future trail access could also be established from 133 Ave to the north, as this portion of the land is fairly heavily treed and will be retained for conservation. b) Desired Outcome: To provide a neighborhood meeting and play space for the residents of Silver Valley, in a timely manner, as it is unknown when the current owner will be willing to sell the previously identified site. c) Strategic Alignment: Developing parks for the current and future residents of Silver Valley is a priority for staff as some residents in the area have been there for a few years now without the benefit of a neighborhood park. 1151 Page 1 of 2 This park development will still be consistent with the desired walking distance for neighborhood parks in the Silver Valley Plan as well as being more accessible to a greater number of residents. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: A neighborhood park process will need to be conducted with the residents in the area to determine what the desired park amenities should be for this proposed park. e) Interdepartmental Implications: Consultation with the planning department to prepare the amendment to the OCP land use designations for the properties noted above. f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The DCC funds identified in the long term capital plan for the acquisition of the park land at 23711 132 Ave can be re assigned to other future projects indentified in the DCC bylaw. g) Policy Implications: Recommend OCP amendment h) Alternatives: The alternative in this case would be to wait until we have a willing seller, in order to acquire the previously identified property for this neighborhood park development. CONCLUSIONS: It is the recommendation of the Property Managements Committee that this park site re designation be considered by Council and is fully supported by Parks and Leisure Services Staff. Prepared by: David Boag Director Parks and Facilities Approved by: Kell Sw' ben6ral Whager, Community Development, Parks and Recreation Concurrence: J.L. (Ji ) Rule ChielVAdministrative Officer DB Page 2of2 LMP 35466 b 30 12 O a�y�, 3733 3 ,,,, 57 17 LM� av>i 1 r `P^ 13347 r3330 8 r 69 a 19 11`�� 10 ( 14 `0 2 a t3343 f 8 �' 13346 2 J �`' 2D 1 C a -P' 2� ry� pi 15 g 1 19 C 71 s 13336 56 _�y0 21 o°j R , Pd'� `'v. 13339 1 ,7332 72 12 $ 12�o 55 23 9e a 24 �1 7 54 11 13325 10 .`0 14 m W 28 i3 1a3zt t `ti M 52 47 49 4 p1a517 8 y 13318 a 44 45 46 48 50 15 1h 30 3 237a1 13313 7 a 16 LMP 254 ' Q 35 p a 13314 '39y) 17 ?3Rs7 �qV5 14 13 12 g; 2 23743 13wo Imm 33 �7q2 6 9 0 f1 23687 2 1 d 6 ssqq 1B 21 22 23 24 25 b 27 28 29 30 31 32 s� 1 2 3 5 7 2365t 23745 '113m6 133� 1 ^',� � 1 23746 23697 1 z37a7 3 4 13301 19 n � - R 20 fi 42 :IMIZDHI 133 AYE. 43 Y 1 10 g m W 132sz 1 24 " 3 5 6 PARK t3M 11 60P 19979 132M z 2 13276 12 m ^ g 10 11 13276 � m °1 R 3 12 m P 2637 13 a a 21 8925 m 13263 m m m 13245 6 13265 d 4 14 8 7 13 U Rem 14 cn lam 239 4 33 m P 47603 c� m 13257 a 7 M1 K i5 5 13250 23 24 13251 `132 AAVE. '+ 13266 15a [979 6 p1fi 6CP 13235 1 PARK m h P 47 3 m 7 r 13225 1a2a0 BOP 16892 20 d 13227 m8 1 m CP 897919 �Y 22 20 13215 17 18 19 cc i3216 Q _ �, ISMS, 13210 a , z Mr. NPARK i P 2637 RLOW ;OPEN 13165 O Imo• 1 I�� LMP 7404 �/ P 37 I EP 13726 ` A P2 7 ,3,so 4 Op 7 5 I R� 1 13,aa EDHI. •� 7 K I13104 A wwrwwi Cit f Pitt Meadows - _ ! = Silver Valley Neighbourhood Park 1 Q �R o CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF 4 MAPLE RIDGE N District of Langley. PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES DEPT. DATE: Mar 2, 2011 FILE: Untitled BY: BM SCALE 1:3,000 c FRASER R.