The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2011-03-22 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA March 22, 2011 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber MEETING DECORUM Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be reprimanded. Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 MOMENT OF REFLECTION Pastor Steve Campbell, Burnett Fellowship 300 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS 400 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 500 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 501 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of March 8, 2011 502 Minutes of the Public Hearing of March 15, 2011 503 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of March 3, March 10, March 14 and March 15, March 16 (2), 2011. Page 1 Council Meeting Agenda March 22, 2011 Council Chamber Page 2 of 7 600 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 700 DELEGATIONS 701 National Volunteer Week 2011 Presentation by Ashley Singh, Community Volunteer Developer, Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows. 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 801 Regional Growth Strategy Review Staff report dated March 14, 2011 recommending that the Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw No. 1136 be accepted. Forwarded from March 14, 2011 Workshop 802 Albion Concept Plan Update Staff report dated March 14, 2011 recommending that the revised Scenario 2 for the Albion Flats Concept Plan be endorsed. Forwarded from March 14, 2011 Workshop 900 CORRESPONDENCE 1000 BYLAWS Note: Item 1001 and 1002 are from the Public Hearing of March 15, 2011. Bylaws for Third Readin s 1001 RZ/113/10, 12028, 12038 and 12048 222 Street Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6786-2010 To allow future construction of a four -storey apartment building with approximately 86 units Third reading Council Meeting Agenda March 22. 2011 Council Chamber Page 3of7 1002 RZ/072/09, 10175, 10121 and 10141240 Street Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6732-2010 To allow future construction of a 159 unit townhouse development Third reading Bylaws for Final Reading 1003 RZ/012/10, 24930 110 Avenue Staff report dated March 22, 2011 recommending final reading 1003.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6746-2010 To amend conservation areas Final reading 1003.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6722-2010 To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) to permit a ten (10) lot single family subdivision) Final reading COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE 1100 Minutes - March 7, 2011 The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting. Public Works and Development Services 1101 RZ/081/06, 236 Street and 1341h Avenue, RS-3 to RS-1b Staff report dated March 21, 2011 recommending that a one year extension be granted to rezoning application RZ/081/06 to permit the future subdivision of 8 single family lots. Council Meeting Agenda March 22, 2011 Council Chamber Page 4 of 7 1102 RZ/033/08, 10366 240 Street, RS-2 to R-3 Staff report dated March 21, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6621-2008 to permit subdivision into 9 single family residential lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1103 RZ/081/10, Section 23, Township 9, Plan BCP24827 (Golden Ears Way), RS-3 to CS-3 Staff report dated March 21, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6805-2011 to facilitate the road alignment for the Golden Ears Bridge be given first reading. 1104 DP/095/10, 11176 Gilker Hill Road Staff report dated March 21, 2011 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/095/10 to establish the form and character of a 51 unit townhouse development. 1105 DVP/095/11, 11176 Gilker Hill Road Staff report dated March 21, 2011 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/095/10 to vary the maximum height and the setbacks. 1106 Award of Contract Storm Sewer Replacements (Reference No. ITT-OP10- 197: Project No. E05-010-052) Staff report dated March 21, 2011 recommending that the 230 Street Storm Sewers Replacement (123 Avenue, Rogers Avenue, 122 Avenue, Eagle Avenue) be awarded to Pedre Contractors Ltd. 1107 2011 Heart and Stroke Big Bike Ride Staff report dated March 21, 2011 recommending that the use of municipal streets be authorized for the 2011 Heart and Stroke Big Bike Ride on April 28 and April 29, 2011. Council Meeting Agenda March 22, 2011 Council Chamber Page 5 of 7 1108 Race the Ridge 2011 Bike Race Staff report dated March 21, 2011 recommending that the use of municipal streets be authorized for the Race the Ridge 2011 Bike Race on May 7 and May 8, 2011. Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police) 1131 Disbursements for the month ended February 28, 2011 Staff report dated March 21, 2011 recommending that disbursements for the month of February, 2011 be approved. 1132 2011 Community Grants Staff report dated March 21, 2011 recommending that the proposed distribution of grants as shown on "Schedule A" of the report be approved. 1133 Appointment of Directors - Pitt Meadows Airport Society 151-31i1111 Staff report dated March 21, 2011 recommending that the resolution attached to the report as Appendix II to amend the process for appointment of directors be adopted, that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign the Special Resolution of the Society, Appendix III, and that a Councillor be appointed to represent the municipality at meetings of the Directors of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society. Community Development and Recreation Service Correspondence Other Committee Issues 1200 STAFF REPORTS Council Meeting Agenda March 22, 2011 Council Chamber Page 6 of 7 1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL 1400 MAYOR'S REPORT 1500 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS 1600 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 1700 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING 1800 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Council Meeting Agenda March 22, 2011 Council Chamber Page 7 of 7 1900 ADJOURNMENT QUESTION PERIOD The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes. Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the information required to provide a complete and accurate response. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings, delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@ma lerid Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca. Checked by: v" - Date: CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES March 3, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Jo -Anne Hertzog, Member Acting Recording Secretary 1. DENNIS G. MURPHY/LEONARDEANE B. MURPHY/PATRICIA A. MURPHY LEGAL: Lot 378, District Lot 249, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan 49441 LOCATION: 21060 Edgedale Avenue OWNER: Dennis G. Murphy/Leonardeane B. Murphy/Patricia A. Murphy REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Single Family Dwelling Covenant - Floodplain THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO DENNIS G. MURPHY/LEONADEANE B. MURPHY/PATRICIA A. MURPHY. CARRIED J.L. (Jim) Pole, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1 503 11527 155 U) 11517 C/) m 11497 111475 1 11451 11438 -o - - - CD T- � N 26 54 T P 33 37 N 25 P 2 112 P 41783 132 P 3 498 134 133 o 135 79 80 rn o N LO O O N 11498 N N N A`E Me. EpGEo SUBJECT PARCEL r 't (0 O I- O O O p T T T N N N N 377 378 136 137 P 19441 P 4 783 T, N J J co � fA Cn -i J V7 Cn (n Cfl CS1 6 n 11442 SL 28 SL 29 SL 27 I _I SL 30 SL 17 SL 18 -4, •• 138 CP J 00 G7 J O O (A _I '— Cq C/) 14" 143 144 51 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy or present status of the information shown on this map. SL �0 1 { 21060 EDGEDALE AVENUE j co I S_219 FLOODPLAIN COVENANT I o CORPORATION OF 5 THE DISTRICT OF • , MAPLE RIDGE LICENSES, PERMITS & BYLAWS DEPT. DATE: Mar 2. 2011 FILE: Untitled BY: JP CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES March 10, 2010 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule. Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. DVP/096/10 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Jo -Anne Hertzog Recording Secretary Lot 5, Except: Parcel One, Ref. Plan 80525, D.L. 400, Group 1, NWD, Plan 69867 22270 - 128 Avenue Kerry and Barbara DAVISON Floodplain & Mixed Use Building Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO DVP/096/10 X-AI Sol 1:117 6 J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member I 3956 P 34423 128 AVE. 0 N 149 P 65767 2141213 212 17 16 15 14 13 o r `weu N � N 4AVE N m � 37 238 11 698f K PARK 239 193 2218s 6 C!I�Af Pitt M yp LMP 20449 2�pg Rem. Pd, 1 PARK Rem "A" P 9032 v 46 47 SUBJECT PROPERTY m x P 44218 P 4421 Rem 5 P 69867 ■■+` 1 N 127 AVE a cn Rem 48 Rem P 41218 PA- qR �qY P 7667 Rem 48 A 898 7 Rem 49 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 LMP 12 7 SK 7409 „A' ti ti m 9 8 �7 m6 SK 10828 "B' 12678 126 AVE. 6 1 126 AVE. 0 G3ip m W O22270 128 AVENUE r'f F)u I1n - o CORPORATION OF t I = THE DISTRICT OF NLangley MAPLE RIDGE District of Lan I2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9 Y I. A. SCALE 1:2,500 i 1' DATE: Mar 7, 2011 FILE: VP/096/10 BY: PC f —_ --_-- CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES March 14, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule- Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. RZ/080/08 Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary LEGAL: Lot 1, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan LMP465, Except: Plan BCP39158; and Parcel A, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP38954 LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS 23227 Dogwood Avenue BETA Enterprises Ltd. Covenant - Parking THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO RZ/080/08. CARRIED J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member ❑ T 1 4 P 1 94 d P P 1 594 Rem.0 w N M A P 1 90 m m N cv j30 Py�, N � M o m [u � � M N N BJECT PROPERTY p 1 594 D E F G I J K L LMP 46534 E14790 P 2fi� 4P1 gag n 21 22 ti ^� ' 2 M A N N CY N " District of 7- Pitt Meadows -- I s�w23227 DOGWOOD AVENUE .� y I � 1 v.11.1 2 `'" ! o 4 CORPORATION OF - I o I t THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE AIWon� District Of _ L--F I PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley SCALE 1:2,000 1. DATE: Sep 3, 2008 FILE: DP/080/08 BY: PC - -- _ -., CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES March 15, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin. Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. DP/012/10 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen. Recording Secretary Lot 14, Section 11, Township 12, Plan 1363, New Westminster District 24930 110 Avenue Surinder Jassal and Sadhu Dhillon Enhancement and Protection Agreement THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO DP/012/10. CARRIED J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 25 P 1363 17 Rem 4 P 71308 11051 P 29924 26 070 rn °j ROAD 11025 N 18 A P 642 54 P 23 RP 16170 P 1363 _ n P 0941 Rem 14 2 1 F a 19 m Subject Property Rem 16 10921 P 23702 P 1363 N 20 Rem B B P 33200 18 17 1615 108E AVE. 14 108M W IOd91 a $ 1 g K 13 P 23702 AlN 10860 a P 34411 a w N 12 � w 10848 22 21 11 A 27 o ! 2 21 o�3s 10PO City of Pitt _� -' j Meadows, sl - 24930-110 Ave x, 0 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF Rio MAPLE RIDGE District of PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley l• : �' SCALE 1:2,500 — +` DATE: Feb 24, 2010 DP/012/10 BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES March 16. 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. FULLER, BRUCE & LINDA LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot B, District Lot 248, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan BCP40207 11560 Fir Street Bruce and Linda Fuller Covenant - Garden Suite & Parking Agreement THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO BRUCE & LINDA FULLER. Er e D in,`Mayor Ch1ir CARRIED J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member rn 4 11631 Rem 2 3 P 9387 KW� P7 O c) N 11 o T r N ,7 :2Z 1 F N P 692 r � m _ 2 co N N _ 191 307 0 0 N 263 N v N RIVER RD C7 N Citmf Pitt Meadows_. 11560 FIR STREET j.2 o! CORPORATION OF L 1 i THE DISTRICT OF N District of I j , MAPLE RIDGE Langley ` I. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:1,500 Untitled BY: PC DATE: Mar 16, 2011 FILE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES March 16, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. KRISS, BARNABAS & GABRIELLA LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 3, District Lot 397, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan 12785 21888 Lougheed Highway Barnabas and Gabriella Kriss Covenant - Garden Suite & Parking Agreement THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO BARNABAS & GABRIELLA KRISS. CARRIED J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member o S L 1 a00o CO0000 co 74 rn rn 8 N N N N N N 7— 00 N N 24 2 1 P 161 67 SL2 CID CO 1 3 `Subject Property' S L3 � 11773 6 11765 SL4 SL15 4 T P 2785 5 co SL5 SU 6 11759 S� 4 o_ 0 SL17 5 SL6 11749 rr>S2 SQ `�' C0 Q0 co SL7 SL18 U 6 N 3 S2 CID SU 9 11739 55 2 T co SL8 SL20 Lo 7 000 11740 SL9 r 11729 11732 56 o- 1 SL21 8 1' SU 0 CID 11722 11719 57 Lo SL22 — Crt f Pitt .. Mea ❑ws ° - j _ ' j 0 21888 - Lougheed Hwy 0 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF District of 1 U MAPLE RIDGE Langley LT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Mar 16, 2011 FILE: Untitled BY: PC SCALE 1:1,000 - ERASER MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: March 14, 2011 FILE NO: ATTN: Workshop Regional Growth Strategy Review - Follow up EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At its meeting of January 14, 2011, the Metro Vancouver Board received a report on the outcomes of the public hearing related to the Regional Growth Strategy. Amendments were made to the strategy based on input received at the public hearing and the Board resolved to submit the Bylaw to all affected local governments for acceptance as required by the Local Government Act. Under the provisions of the Act, all affected local governments have 60 days to respond. On February 14, 2011, Council gave consideration to the Regional Growth Strategy and requested that clarification be provided on the process for amendments to the Strategy. This report provides a response to that question, and also responds to some of the points raised during the meeting that were not reflected in the Resolution. The responses provided in this report are largely based on information provided by Metro Vancouver. The Chief Administration Officer of Metro Vancouver will be in attendance at the March 14th Workshop to provide further clarification on the questions raised by Council. RECOMMENDATION That the Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw No. 1136 be accepted. DISCUSSION a) Background Context At the February 14, 2011 Council Workshop, Council gave consideration to the Regional Growth Strategy (Bylaw No 1136) and directed that staff obtain clarification from Metro Vancouver on the process for amendment to the Regional Growth Strategy. The specific question was: a) What happens if a municipality goes through arbitration and wins? Do the results of that arbitration get circulated to all member municipalities for ratification? Page 1 of 4 In addition, the following points were raised during the Council discussion: i) the perspective on the economic viability of the Regional Growth Strategy from the responsible Provincial Ministry; ii) the appropriateness of population and employment projections in the Regional Growth Strategy; and iii) the suitability of the Albion Flats as a Frequent Transit Corridor. Responses to Question and Points Raised The following is a response to the question raised during the Workshop: a) What happens if a municipality goes through arbitration and wins? Do the results of that arbitration get circulated to all member municipalities for ratification? In the event that a local government goes through the arbitration process, and that results in changes to the RGS, the strategy would be circulated to all member municipalities for acceptance. The Ministry of Community Services produced a document entitled the "Regional Growth Strategies: An Explanatory Guide". That document states: "If changes to the RGS are proposed based on results of the non -binding process, the strategy must again be submitted to affected local governments for acceptance. This step is required because not all affected local governments may have participated in the resolution process or have been a party to the proposed changes which may directly affect them." As mentioned previously, there were also a number of points raised during the Workshop that were not included in the Resolution, but that warrant some discussion. The following provides an explanation to each of those points: i) the perspective on the economic viability of the Regional Growth Strategy from the responsible Provincial Ministry; On October 27, 2010, Metro Vancouver received a letter from the Assistant Deputy Minister of Community, Sport and Cultural Development providing feedback on the draft Regional Growth Strategy (see letter attached). In that correspondence the Ministry commends the Region for the Strategy and notes that the draft RGS addresses requirements outlined in the legislation. The letter also states that the Province is particularly interested in policies and actions that encourage the development of complete communities, and reduced green house gas emissions. No concerns regarding the economic viability of the Growth Strategy are noted in the letter. ii) the appropriateness of the population and employment projections in the Regional Growth Strategy; Appendix A of the Regional Growth Strategy consists of 4 tables that include projections related to housing demand, population and employment. While there has been some concern raised regarding the appropriateness of these figures it is observed that the tables Page 2 of 4 includes notes clarifying that the projections are only guidelines and are provided for guidance to municipalities. iii) the suitability of the Albion Flats as a Frequent Transit Corridor; Goal 1 of the Regional Growth Strategy is to Create a Compact Urban Area and Table 2 within that section identifies the land use characteristics for each type of urban centre identified within the Strategy (Metropolitan Core, Regional City Centres, Municipal Town Centres and Frequent Transit Development Areas). To be eligible for identification as one of these centres, an area must satisfy the description and land use characteristics prescribed in the Strategy. Generally speaking, the Frequent Transit Development Areas are located adjacent to TransLink's Frequent Transit Network; are locations of commercial, industrial or institutional activity; and are a focus of medium and higher density housing. With regards to the Albion Flats, the area is identified as a Special Study Area, acknowledging that the municipality has expressed its intention to review the existing land use designations. The majority of the lands are also within the Agricultural Land Reserve. The study of this area is well underway. Pending the outcome of the review of the area, and subsequent decisions by the Agricultural Land Commission, changes in land use designations would be reflected in a revised Regional Context Statement. At that time the land use designations would be known and should the outcome of the Albion Flats review warrant frequent transit, this could also be pursued for inclusion in the new Regional Context Statement. b) Desired Outcome The Regional Growth Strategy has been given First and Second reading , been the subject of an extensive public hearing and consultation process and been forwarded to the member municipalities for acceptance. At the February 14, 2011 Workshop, staff were directed to provide clarification on the process for amendments to the Regional Growth Strategy which has been included in the staff report. Assuming the information provided was sufficient, it would seem appropriate to accept the Regional Growth Strategy. c) Alternatives Should Council chose not to accept the Regional Growth Strategy, it must indicate the provisions to which it objects and the reasons for its objections. Once the Board has received the non -acceptance, it will notify the Minister who will set in motion the settlement process which will focus on and resolve the issues raised. Depending on the settlement process used, if there are changes to the Growth Strategy, these changes will be subject to an acceptance process by the other member municipalities. If no changes are required, the Board can move to final adoption. The legislation specifies that until all affected governments have accepted the RGS, or until a settlement process has been completed, the RGS cannot be adopted. Additionally, staff at the Province have indicated that all costs of the settlement process are to be borne by the member municipality who has not accepted the RGS. Page 3 of 4 CONCLUSION: The Regional Growth Strategy has been forwarded for acceptance to member municipalities by the Metro Vancouver Board at its meeting of January 14, 2011. Member municipalities have 60 days (March 22, 2011) to respond. As all issues identified by the District have been addressed by the Region, and further clarification on the process for amendments has been provided, it is therefore recommended that Council accept Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw No. 1136. Prepared by: Christine Carter, MPI, MCIP Manager of Community Planning Approved by,: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng r GM: Public Works & De op ent Services Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendix is attached hereto: Appendix A - letter dated October 27, 2010 from the Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development Page 4of4 BRITISH C_OLUMBIA The Kest Place on Earth October 27.2010 Ref: 137 367 Christina DeMarco Regional Development Division Manager Metro Vancouver 4330 Kingsway Burnaby, BC V511 4G8 Dear Ms. DeMarco: Thank you for your letter of September 8. 2010, which was attached to the September 3, 2010 draft of Metro Vancouver's Regional Growth Strategy- (draft RGS), entitled Aferro Vancouver 2040: Shaping Our Future. The Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development (the Ministry) is pleased to pro-,ide feedback as a member of the Intergovernmental Advisory Committee. Firstly, on behalf of the Ministry, I %mould like to commend Metro Vancouver staff for working closely with the Technical Advisory Committee during the spring and summer to resolve outstanding issues identified by affected local governments. That process provided a good forum for working towards agreement on the draft policies in the RGS prior to moving into the acceptance phase. The Ministry appreciates that the region is faced with extremely complex issues that need to be balanced %,*ith local interests in order to establish a new RGS for lone -term planning and growth management in the region. v The mandate of the Ministry is "To equip communities across British Columbia to build strong, competitive local and regional economics that support environmentallv sustainable and socially resilient communities". Regional growth strategies are a critical mechanism for delivering on this mandate as they provide the framework for cooperation and coordination at a regional scale to support integrated planning between local governments, Provincial agencies. and First Nations. Ministry of Community, Assistant Dcput} Miniver Alailing Address - Spurt and Coltural LLw:al Gunrmment PO Lion 9490 Stn Pros Gosh Development Victoria BC VSW 9N7 Phnoc 251135E-6575 Fat: 250 357-7973 Location. 61h Hoor 9001ohnsun Sucer victoria www.gnv bc.caicd Christina De 0arco Page 2 The Loral Government Aci, sections 849 and 850 specify the purpose and content of regional growth strategies. From a general perspective. although other Provincial agencies and ministries will have more specificRGS has addressed t comments, I believe the draft hose sections of the legislation. The Ministry is specifically interested in policies and actions that encourage the development ofcontplete. compact communities, and reduced green house gas emissions. The folloxving comments on Metro's current drat: RGS reflect those interests: • On May = 1. 2011. all RGSs will be legally required to include greenhouse gas reduction targets, actions, and polices. While the draft RGS has adopted the Provincial targets, the associated actions and policies are not explicitly identified in the document. It may seem e%ident as to which actions and policies contribute to the regional targets and it -would be helpful if they were clearly identified to demonstrate compliance with the legislation. • The Ministry would like to reinforce its support of local and regional initiatives that encourage climate change mitigation and adaptation and recognizes Metro Vancouver's response to the issue. • The draft RGS strategy cm diverse affordable housing choices is in alignment Hith the September 2009 Throne Speech and this year's L'BCN1 Convention session on Makin Yome Uv°rrc'rshin-io-ordcibie in BC The i linistry would like to take this optort:Lnity to e`p7ess °.tS interest in working, %&iih Metro VancC uNer on that szmteg3 oni:e the RGS moves into the irnplementatiors priasc. • industral land is of key importance to the Province. The Ministn- appreciates Metro Vancouver's e+forts to preserve the supply of industrial land in the region. Much work needs to be done to not only preserve such Iar,ds but to also expand the supply in order t4 greet the s:�ais associated -,vith the Pacific Gateway Strategy. • The Ministry also continues to support the development of urban centres over the long terra which is in line with 'Metro Vancouver's commitment 10 a comnact region. as identified in Goal I of the draft RGS. Thcre is an intrinsic relationship amone urban centres. transit. employment. and greenhouse Ras reductions. These relationships need to be strengthened ir: order for the region and the Province to realize changes to the built environment that Aill result in meaningful greenhouse gas reductions. • Consistent with the previous poir_t, the NlinisLr encourages Metro Vancou' er to work ,A-ith Tran.st ink to ensure `your shared transportation goals are achieved. The Ministry would also like to emphasize th;. iniporiance ofthe Provincial transit plan. .gain. I commend Metro Vancouver staff for their work or, draft RGS. Ministry staffis committed to assisting Metro Vancouver -with the acceptance process and 1 would ask tha- you please notify me of any potential disagreements arising with affected local governments with which Nlinistn staff could help facilitate. Christina DeMarco Page 3 Once the draft RGS is adopted, the Ministry would be interested in working with ti".etro Vancouver on its implementation as the RGS will be a guide for future actions, on the part of all levels of government, toward realizing a sustainable region. In that regard, the Ministry :gill be interested in how the r egional context statements are amended, particularly in terms of how they address such issues as the contribution of post -secondary institutions to the economic development of a community, including employment and transportation options; and, focussing growth around, and supporting the planned function, of urban centres and frequent transit development areas. Ministry staff will be available to support Metro Vancouver in its implementation efforts. specifically around the development of implementation agreements of interest to the region, Provincial agencies, and the Province in general. I look forward to further opportunities for discussion on the draft RGS as it moves into the acceptance process. If you have any further questions, please contact Karen Rothe, Growth Strategies Manager, Intergovernmental Planning and Relations Division, at 250 356-7064, or via email at: Karen. Rotheraaeov.be. ca. Yours truly. Mike Furev Ass;stant Depute 'Minister PC: Mr. 3ohnnv Carline Chief Administrative Ofcer Metro Vancouver Regional District MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Albion Flats Concept Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: March 14, 2011 FILE NO: ATTN: 'Workshop Following a detailed public process the Districts consultant, HR Lanarc presented its report (the Albion Flats Charrette Summary Report) to Council. Council considered and discussed this report over the following meetings • Council Workshop - February 7 2010 • Regular Council Meeting - February 8, 2010 • Council Workshop - February 14, 2010 At the February 14, Workshop Council passed the following resolutions; That the outcome from the February 14th Workshop discussion be moved to a Public Information meeting, with the comments and results of that work being forwarded to the ALC for comment. If an exclusion application is determined, following the comments from the ALC, a Public Hearing on the exclusion application will be held. That Council request staff to prepare for consideration at the next available Workshop, Scenario 2 with the following additional components: 1. Agricultural buildings reflected from Scenario 1, appropriately located in Scenario 2 to enhance food distribution; 2. Neighbourhood pub component from Scenario 1; 3. Community centre/recreation/meeting space as defined in Scenario 4. The following amendment to the above motion was also passed 4. Expectations that alternative agricultural activities and environmental practice plus agricultural offset options be reflected. The revisions to Scenario 2 directed by Council have been made and the revised Concept Plan is attached to this report. Also included in this report is an anticipated schedule for the process approved by Council at the February 14th Council Workshop. RECOMMENDATION(S): That this report along with the following recommendation be forwarded to a regular Council Meeting for consideration; "That the revised Scenario 2 for the Albion Flats Concept Plan attached to the report dated March14, 2010 be endorsed". :1' DISCUSSION Revised Scenario 2 Pursuant with the above resolution, Scenario 2 has been revised to include the following: • A 100 plot community garden • A number of agricultural fields on the eastern portion of the site that may be used for the growing of small scale agricultural products. • A brew pub in the Transit Oriented Mixed Use residential and commercial node at 240th and Lougheed Highway • Agricultural fairgrounds and farm cluster with a small industrial kitchen for processing and storage; a farm direct market and farmer's market; restaurant; compost facility; farm and food education institute and training,/research farm; and small livestock and farm barns. • A multi -purpose recreational facility that can serve as a community centre and provide community meeting spaces. • An agro-industrial park These revisions are reflected in Attachment 1 to this report. It should be noted that Scenario 2 remains unchanged west of 105 Avenue. Alternative Agricultural Activities and Environmental Practices, Plus Agricultural Offset Options Following Council's review of the revised Scenario 2 a Public Information Meeting will be held. Input and feedback from the Public Information Meeting will be provided to Council. Following Council's review of the public input the final draft of the Concept Plan will be forwarded to the ALC for comment. In addition to the Concept Plan, information in support of a potential future exclusion application will also be provided. This will include potential alternative agricultural activities and environmental practices, plus agricultural offset options. It will also include any relevant information provided by the public/property owners through the Public Information Meeting. As well, staff is currently reviewing exclusion applications over the past decade by municipalities within Metro/ Fraser Valley areas. This review, which includes the various municipalities' staff reports and the ALC reports, will provide useful information on the necessary requirements for a successful exclusion application. Process: At the February 14, 2011 Workshop, Council approved a revised process for the submission of a Concept Plan to the Agricultural Land Commission for comment. The following table illustrates the key steps and anticipated dates for this revised process. It is important to note that the timing for the receipt of comments from the Agricultural Land Commission is unknown, and there was an assumption made that the District would receive comments within a two to three month timeframe. Task Date Action item 1. Council Workshop March 14, 2011 - to Review Scenario 2 revisions 2. Open House March 30,2011 - to seek input on revised Scenario 2 3. Council Update May 2, 2011 - to review Public Feedback and discuss next steps 4. Submit package to ALC Week of May 2'd - Assume 2 to 3 months for ALC review 5. Council consideration of July, August or September - Steps 6,7 & 8 will ALC Comments 2011 depend on the response from the ALC 6. Public Hearing September 2011 - Submission Requirement 7. Council Meeting September or October 2011 - Consider Public Hearing comments and forward Exclusion Application to ALC 8. Submission of Exclusion October or November 2011 Application to ALC Consultation: As noted on the above process chart, an Open House is proposed to be held on March 30t" 2011. The purpose of the Open House is to provide a summary of the steps taken to date and to obtain feedback on Council's revised Scenario 2. A comment sheet will be available to obtain feedback. Written feedback may be submitted in formats other than the comment sheets. The Open House will be advertized in both local Newspapers, and will be posted in the District website. An email will also be sent to Albion Flats Stakeholder participants notifying them of the Open House. CONCLUSION: At the February 14sh Council Workshop Council al Concept Plan. Council directed that a number of have been made and are addressed in this report. forwarded to a Public Information Meeting. Prepared by: Christine Carter, MPI, MCIP Manager Community Planning proved a revised process to complete the Albion revisions be made to Scenaio 2. Those revisions It is recommended that the revised Scenario 2 be Approved y: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng, :Public Works & ev pment Services 17 Concurrence: .j.L. (Jim) Rule ,Chief Administrative Officer The following appendix is attached hereto: Scenario 2 With Council Revisions Scenario 2 With Council Revisions l` � business Office , � •' � R 4 � '• - `, k Aalricultural Gairgrcunds & Farm Custer `f �� '� � 1 Small industrial k�tci'�en processmq ard sba-aoe ' = `•,'' farm direct market and farmer's rrAet ' I estaurant Auto oriet�ed regional V- SthAvenue arm and food educaticn nstitut and tranwc;% servinq retail t 's C research farm •{ _ i= 1 \ Small Nestock, and farm barns i1 \� `� Compost �acillty 40 , k t � Multi -purpose recreation facilit� 100 plot � N, . G._ •., � �� -`t . fjp � communitu garden _ '�� rownhcuse Mixed �mploUment Node. �I Office & Liqkb lndu5trial I Transit oriented mixed use, residential & - A - l commercial Agriculture fields 1I Townhouse y El{ I Area --- Area Area i Area Type* 2 Area(ftz) {) {Ha} I_(Acres) Agricultural Fair and Ag Structures/ 10198 18 109,772.30 1.02 2,52 Facilities 1 — 3rew pub — — -` W —;�. Employment: Commercial/Light 258,793.82 2,785,633.50 25.87 63.95 Industrial/Business office fran5it-oriented mixed Use! GreenspaceJStream set -backs 411,084.46 4,424,876.30 41.10 101.58 residertlal &Commercial _ _ --- Agricultural Fields 33,556.71 361,201.42 3.35 8.29 Recreation 163,284.47 1,757,579.40 16.33 40.35 Townhouse 20,886.05 224,815.57 2-09 5-16 Transit -Oriented Mixed Use 14,079.56 ' 151,551.12 1.41 3,48 * Area calculations are approximate and totals vary between concepts. Due to the conceptual stage that the design is at the parking, circulation, access and rights -of -way are not yet possible to calculate to any degree of accuracy. ALBION FLATS CONCEPT PLAN I MARCH 2O11 1 2. 3 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6786-2010 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6786-2010." Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 3 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 9669 Lot 4 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 9669 Lot A District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan LMP8411 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1503, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential). Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 11th day of January, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the 8th day of February, A.D. 2011. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a third time the day of APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the PRESIDING MEMBER A.D. 20 . , A.D. 20 . day of , A.D. 20 . day of , A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER 1001 98 a to 12138 12 N 12139 274 99 rn 11 33 � _0 12 229 12120 10 D_ 273 `D W 100 12123 12112 �! 7 8 9 272 280 j 12119 12106 n P 1 997 m 281 co v2 o O m P m O r= d r M n m 12096 N 1L N N 12111 N 103 121 AVE. N CEP 30259 12M / N O co o co n m 104 N N N 0 12080 K L M N P 169 7 105 12075 12070 P 169 7 106 J- I H G 12060 o n N N N N 12061 107 CHURCH AVE. 12048 - �12284 108 N N F 1 1 E 109 P 14898 12035 12026 C ol 0- cv IL � I D 110 N a W N N EWDNEYTRUNK RD N O m n N N N N C 1 PA NWS 3374 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6786-2010 Map No. 1503 From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) I I Rem 14 12131 0 In G N15 N P 10689 127 (P 9669) 0_ 16 12128 12117 17 I NWS 133 LMP 27702 1 12097 "A„ 18 c ~ (P 38752) � a 12096 O N N N N 19 12087 N BCP 15939 LMP 27701 I LMP 12218 BROWN AVE. MAPLE RIDGE Brilish Coiumbla N SCALE 1:2,000 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6732 - 2010 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6732 - 2010." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Parcel "H" (Plan with fee deposited 22319F) of Parcel "One" (Plan with fee deposited 14153F) District Lot 405 Group 1 New Westminster District South East 198 Feet by 660 Feet (Plan with fee deposited No. 14240F) District Lot 405 Group 1 Having a Frontage of 198 Feet on Baker Road by a uniform depth of 660 Feet and adjoining Parcel "G" (Reference Plan 2701) New Westminster District Parcel "G" (Reference Plan 2701) District Lot 405 Group 1 New Westminster District and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1479 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 13th day of April , A.D. 2010. READ a second time the 27th day of April, A.D. 2010. PUBLIC HEARING held the 18th day of May, A.D. 2010. READ a third time the 25th day of May, A.D. 2010. SECOND AND THIRD READINGS WERE RECINDED the 22nd day of February, A.D. 2011. RE -READ a second time the 22nd day of February, A.D. 2011. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . RE -READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the PRESIDING MEMBER day of day of ,A.D.20. 7A.D.20. .CORPORATE OFFICER MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6732-2010 Map No. 1479 From: RS-2(One Family Suburban Residential) and RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) To: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) 1:2500 Deep Roots DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: March 22, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/012/10 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: COUNCIL SUBJECT: Final Reading: Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6746 - 2010 Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6722 - 2010 24930 110 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Bylaws 6746 - 2010 and 6722 - 2010 have been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently were granted Third Reading. The applicant has requested that Final Reading be granted. The purpose of the rezoning is to permit subdivision into ten (10) lots not less than 557.4m2. RECOMMENDATION: That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6746 - 2010 be adopted; and That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6722 - 2010 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on September 21, 2010. On October 12, 2010 Council granted Third Reading to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6746 - 2010 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6722 - 2010 with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed: Payment of equivalent construction costs associated with the future equestrian trail being relocated to an alternative location; Park dedication as required; and iii. Amendment to Schedule "B" and "C" of the Official Community Plan. The followin ag lies to the above: The applicant has provided the required funds for the future equestrian trail; The park dedication has been registered and the dedication is to take place before final subdivision approval; and 1003 iii. The amendment to Schedule "B" and "C" of the Official Community Plan will be completed with Final Reading of this application. CONCLUSION: As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that Final Reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6746 - 2010 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6722 - 2010. Prepared by: Sarah Atkinson Plannirg-Technician 1� Ap rove a i in , CP, MCIP Direc r of Planni Approved by: (Frank Quinn, MBA, F.Eng It GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Bylaw No. 6746 - 2010 Appendix C - Bylaw No. 6722 - 2010 Appendix D - Subdivision Plan WM —� Appendix A a 2 I I P 71308 A RP 16170 Rem 16 P 1363 17 P 29924 11025 18 n m 0) 10941 m a 19 v 10921 20 10891 m a 21 25 City of Pitt Meadows T` 24930-110 Ave CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF n � --�0 MAPLE RIDGE District of Langley { J �. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,500 DATE: Feb 24, 2010 SD/012/10 BY: PC FFIASER R. --- Appendix B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6746 - 2010 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "B" & "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6746 - 2010." 2. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 14 Except: Firstly: Part dedicated Road on Plan 29924 Secondly: Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 33401), Section 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 1363 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 797, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby redesignated to Conservation. Schedule "C" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 14 Except: Firstly: Part dedicated Road on Plan 29924 Secondly: Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 33401), Section 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 1363 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 800, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the 31st day of August, A.D. 2010. READ A SECOND TIME the 31st day of August, A.D. 2010. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the 21st day of September, A.D. 2010. READ A THIRD TIME the 12th day of October, A.D. 2010. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1003.1 2 25 P 1363 17 Rem 4 P 71308 N 11051 0 P 29924 3 Y U O 26 1t070 11025 P 29924 W i 18 A P 8C 54 RP 16170 1097r. o0 �+ 10941 2 1 F a I � 19 P 1363 Rem 14 m � Rem 16 10921 _ rr.P P 1363 20 18 B 17 P 33200 16 15 � m m b � w 108B AVE. 14 w � toast 1°6� C rn m 19 N�2O N ¢ rn a N 13 taseo P 23702 0 P 34411 MAPLE RIDGE 0FFIC IAL C OMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6746-2010 Map No. 797 From: Low/Medium Density Residential To: C onservation N SCALE 1:2,5C Appendix C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6722 - 2010 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6722 - 2010." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 14 Except: Firstly: Part dedicated Road on Plan 29924 Secondly: Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 33401), Section 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 1363 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1474 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 23rd day of March, A.D. 2010. READ a second time the 31St day of August, A.D. 2010. PUBLIC HEARING held the 21st day of September, A.D. 2010. READ a third time the 12th day of October, A.D. 2010. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER , A.D. 200. CORPORATE OFFICER 1003.2 t&A-l"l 1 A RP 16170 10974 0.809 ha Rem 16 P 1363 na 18 0.809 ha ANIM rn 10941 F y 0_ 19 0.809 ha 10921 0 O 0 26 Y U O 0.703 ha 11070 m N P 29924 0 rn a rn N N P 84254 P 1363 2 1 F Rem 14 1.922 ha. 1.273 ha. 0.513 ha. 1.785 ha. S P 23702 N 3.104 ha 20 0.809 ha pW 10891 M B P 33204 18 17 H 16 15 o � 108B AVE. 14 19 20 N 10880 13 m 0 P 23702 w w 2 Rem B 0.805 ha. P :411 N 1OB48 1.163 ha. p P ' �08 108AAVE. Z `\ N FIT 0.809 ha. 2.032 ha. MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6722-201.0 Map No. 1474 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: RS-1 b (One Family Urban (medium density) Residential) N SCALE 1:2,500 Appendix D y 4 Land Surveying Lid Cy l�r. W71 SL Anne A-., .. T Pb— 60-463-2579 Fpl_ 604-463-4501 Road 110th Avenue ne7 Client: Valley Peak Developments Ltd 18 ° a�4 cll� Project: %f 249JO 110th Avenue f I FUTURE DEV. Maple Ridge 11 a Pt 7243 m2 Total 8277 m2 e�t:g Drawing Title. - Proposed Subdivision Plan Of ti Lot 14 Except: Firstly. Part Dedicated Road On Plan N 29924, Secondly Parcel "A" (Exp Plan JJ401) Sec 11 Tp 12 NND Plan 1363 PC - PARK Pt 2559 m2 ifLIQ Notes. - PLAN 1363 20.0 11 ' �• Pt 1034-4 m2 1 I` \ r6j f�7d T&30 IL re I W 3.0- i.5 1.5 9 r 18 Ij I i 6 I Road 2400..5 m2 ,V77VI,VUf1 i3UIt0/NG ENVELOPES 12x12 RS-16, 12xl5 N-Q-F J rr.a5 17, 1777 1177 17-7P 11 !! 2 fl 3 Il 4 +I 5 Is I.761'd w�7 � 17]fi feA � 557.5 m2 I S+7a m7 � 557.E m2 I II Il li 11 w L---J L - - - J L - - - J A $7.0 17.71 1771 rx7r V.71 18 17 16 15 SCALE 1: 500 0 25 50 m Ce111K 1-1 Mi, Mh Oay Of Yay 2010 Scale: 1 : 500 Date: July 19, 2010 Of File: MR06-115SK2 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: March 21,2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/081/06 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Rezoning- Final One Year Extension Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6489-2007 Legal: Lot 8, Section 28, Township 12, Plan 2637; PID: 010-501-932 236 Street & 134 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council granted a one year extension to the above noted application on March 24, 2010. The applicant has now applied for a final one year extension under Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. This application is to rezone 1.13 acres of the District -owned property (with no civic address), in Silver Valley, from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) zone to RS- 1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), to permit the future subdivision of 8 single family lots. This application involves the exchange of land for "park" (west of 236th Street) with 8 lots rezoned and subdivided under this application. RECOMMENDATION: That a one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/081/06 and that the following conditions be addressed prior to consideration of final reading: i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iii. Completion of Phase -II of the subdivision located at 13396 233rd Street and transfer to the District of the "Park" lot intended to be exchanged for the subject site. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Paul Hayes Owner: District of Maple Ridge Legal Description: Lot 8, Section 28, TP 12, Plan 2637; PID: 010-501-932 OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RS-1b (One Family Urban Residential -Medium Density) Vacant land owned by District RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Low -Medium Residential, Conservation and Open Space Single Family Residential RS-1b (One Family Urban -Medium Density); R-1 (Residential District) and CD-1-93 (Comprehensive Development) Low -Medium and Medium Density Residential Vacant land owned by District RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Open Space, Low -Medium and Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-1b (One Family Urban -Medium Density) Low -Medium and Medium Density Residential; Park; Conservation Vacant Single Family Residential 0.457 hectares (1.13 acres) 236th Street and 1341h Avenue Full Urban SD/081/06 This application is to permit rezoning of the site to permit a future subdivision of 8 single family lots zoned RS-1b (One Family Urban -Medium Density). The following dates outline Council's consideration of the application and Bylaw 6489-2007: - First Reading was granted February 24, 2009; - Public Hearing was held March 17, 2009; - Second and Third reading was granted on March 24, 2009. - First extension was granted March 23, 2010. Application Progress: The final subdivision approval and registration of SD/019/10 (Landmark-phase2), creating the park lot for land exchange, is expected to provide for all the off -site servicing works for this application (RZ/081/06). Once this happens, item i above will be redundant. WA 1i. The Preliminary Letter of Approval for SD/081/06 (the proposed 8 lot subdivision for the land exchange) has been amended to include this condition, so that the Land Exchange Agreement between the developer and the District could be finalized. iii. The applicant is working towards satisfying all the conditions of the Preliminary Letter of Approval for SD/019/10 (Landmark -phase 2), creating the "Park" lot. The applicant's consultant is revising the subdivision servicing drawings after getting comments from the Engineering Department. Once these are acceptable, the Subdivision Servicing Agreement will be executed along with all outstanding servicing securities paid, prior to the final approval of the subdivision. It is anticipated that this will happen in the next few months. Alternatives: Council may choose one of the following alternatives: 1. grant the request for extension; 2. deny the request for extension; or 3. repeal third reading of the bylaw and refer the bylaw to Public Hearing. CONCLUSION: The applicant has been actively pursuing the completion of this rezoning application and has applied for a final one year extension. Once the "park" lot is created through the Landmark -phase 2 subdivision, final consideration could be given to these lands for the land exchange to occur. The proposed rezoning is with the intention of exchanging zoned and subdivided land with the applicant. This land -exchange allows the park to be acquired without direct purchase and the Land Exchange Agreement is being finalized in consultation with the District solicitor. Therefore, it is recommended that application RZ/081/06 be granted a final one year extension. Prepared by: Rasika Ac a, B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEEDS AP v Planner 0 Jane 'Pick mg; M.C.1.P DireZox,aOlan� Approved by.,/Frank Quinn ; GPI: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) RtAe Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - First Reading Report -3- Appendix A DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: March 3, 2010 RZ/081/06 CofW SUBJECT: Rezoning - First Extension Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6489-2007 Legal: Lot: 8, Section: 28, Township: 12, Plan: 2637; PID: 010-501-932 236 Street & 134 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant for the above noted file has applied for an extension to this rezoning application under Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. This application is to rezone 1.13 acres of the District -owned property (with no civic address), in Silver Valley, from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) zone to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), to permit the future subdivision of 8 single family lots. This application involves the exchange of land for "park" (west of 236th Street) with 8 lots rezoned and subdivided under this application. RECOMMENDATION: That a one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/081/06 and that the following conditions be addressed prior to consideration of final reading: i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iii. Completion of Phase -II of the subdivision located at 13396 233rd Street and transfer to the District of the "Park" lot intended to be exchanged for the subject site. 016Y611,6* 4110 a) Background Context: Applicant: Paul Hayes Owner: District of Maple Ridge Legal Description: Lot: 8, Section: 28, TP: 12, Plan: 2637; PID: 010-501-932 OCP: Existing: Medium Density Residential Proposed: Medium Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban Residential -Medium Density) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Vacant land owned by District Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Low -Medium Residential, Conservation and Open Space South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban -Medium Density); R-1 (Residential District) and CD-1-93.(Comprehensive Development) Designation: Low -Medium and Medium Density Residential East: Use: Vacant land.owned by District Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Open Space, Low -Medium and Medium Density Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-1b (One Family Urban -Medium Density) Designation: Low -Medium and Medium Density Residential; Park; Conservation Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: 0.457 hectares (1.13 acres) Access: 23611 Street and 134th Avenue Servicing: to urban standard through the Rezoning Servicing Agreement Companion Applications: SD/081/06 This application is to permit rezoning of the site to permit a future subdivision of 8 single family lots zoned RS-1b (One Family Urban -Medium Density). The following dates outline Council's consideration of the application and Bylaw/s 6489-2007 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6489-2007: First Reading was granted February 24, 2009; Public Hearing was held March 17, 2009; Second and Third reading was granted on March 24, 2009. -2- Application Progress: • Item i will be dealt with as soon as the final servicing drawings are submitted for review. These are being finalized based on comments from the Engineering Department. • Item ii requires a Geotechnical Covenant addressing the suitability of the site for the proposed development. The applicant's Geotechnical Engineer is working on a consolidated Geotechnical Report which will be attached to this restrictive covenant. • Item iii deals with creation of the park lot for the land swap. Originally the Landmark subdivision was a single proposal which was later phased due to the changing market conditions in the last two years. Recently the Landmark -phase 1 subdivision was completed. At a Closed meeting on June 12, 2006, Council authorized staff to enter into an agreement with the owner that would allow the District to acquire the portion of the subject property which is designated for park in exchange for a portion of neighbouring District owned property (the subject site). The applicant is currently preparing for the Landmark -phase 2 subdivision application and recently had a meeting with the Property Manager to discuss the revised development costs associated with the land swap. Although the agreement has not been finalized to date, now that the Landmark -phase 2 layout and related service requirements on the District owned property are largely determined, the parties expect to finalize the exchange agreement in the near future. Alternatives: Council may choose one of the following alternatives: 1. grant the request for extension; 2. deny the request for extension; or 3. repeal third reading of the bylaw and refer the bylaw to Public Hearing. CONCLUSION: The applicant has been actively pursuing the completion of this rezoning application and has applied for a one year extension. It is anticipated that within the next couple of months the Landmark subdivision -phase 2 application will be submitted as all the preliminary work has been done. Once the "park" lot is created through the Landmark -phase 2 subdivision, final consideration could be given to these lands for the land swap to occur. The proposed rezoning is with the intention of exchanging zoned and subdivided land with the applicant. This land -swap allows the park to be acquired without direct purchase. Therefore, it is recommended that application RZ/081/06 be granted a one year extension. -3- Prepared by: Rasika Ach`arya, B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED® AP Plan r r wig, -MCP, MCIP of Planning Approved by., Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services f �= Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer F RA/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A- 1st Reading Report -4- Deep Roots Greeter Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: February 2, 2009 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/081/06 Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6489-2007 Legal: Lot: 8, Section: 28, Township: 12, Plan: 2637; PID: 010-501-932 236 Street & 134 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. This application is to rezone 0.457 hectares (1.13 acres) of the District -owned property located at the south-west corner of 236th Street and 134th Avenue in Silver Valley, from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) zone to RS-1b (One Family Urban Residential -Medium Density), to permit the future subdivision of 8 single family lots. The applicant, Mr. Paul Hayes, has agreed to exchange land on his property designated "park" for the land being rezoned for 8 lots under this application. Phase 1 of this subdivision proposed at 13396 2331d Street (SD/081/08) to the west of 2361h Street consists of 28 RS-1b (One Family Urban Residential -Medium Density) zoned lots. The applicant and the District have agreed to exchange like for like property, thus the District lands need to be rezoned. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6489-2007 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iii. Completion of Phase -II of the subdivision located at 13396 233rd Street and transfer to the District of the "Park" lot intended to be exchanged for the subject site. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Paul Hayes Owner: District of Maple Ridge Legal Description: Lot: 8, Section: 28, TP: 12, Plan: 2637; PID: 010- 501-932 OCP: Existing: Medium Density Residential Proposed: Medium Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: Vacant land owned by District RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Low -Medium Residential, Conservation and Open Space Single Family Residential RS-1b (One Family Urban -Medium Density); R-1 (Residential District) and CD-1-93 (Comprehensive Development) Low -Medium and Medium Density Residential Vacant land owned by District RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Open Space, Low -Medium and Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-1b (One Family Urban -Medium Density) Low -Medium and Medium Density Residential; Park; Conservation Vacant Single Family Residential 0.457 hectares (1.13 acres or 4569.99 m2) 236t' Street and 1349" Avenue to urban standard through the Rezoning Servicing Agreement SD/081/06 The proposal is to rezone 22.6 % of the total site (0.457 hectares out of 2.022 hectares) owned by the District, to support a future subdivision of 8 single family lots. The site slopes down from the northeast corner to the southeast corner with an average 20 % grade. The access to the site is mainly from 23WI Street and also from 134t" Avenue. The above mentioned site is owned by the District and the applicant is accepting this rezoned site in exchange for a "Park" lot which will be created in phase II of a subdivision proposed at 13396, 2331d Street. -2- c) Planning Analysis: Off vial C mmuni PI n: The Official Community Plan designation for the subject property is Residential -Medium (71%) and Open Space (28%). The portion of the site proposed to be rezoned Density Urban -Medium Density) lots occupies only 22.6 % of the site; hence the r to 8oposal s n l is in compliance (One Family Pr with the Official Community Plan. Zoni B 1 w: The Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw requires RS-1b lots to be minimum 15.0 m wide, a minimum lot size of 557 m2. The proposed 8 RS-1b (One Family Urban Residential- Density) lots range in area from 558 m2 to 609.3 m2 and Comply e, esid m deep and m in the proposed zone. dential- Medium ply with the width and depth required evelo men Information Mee in in As the development proposal is for less than 25 units in compliance with the Official Community Plan, a Development Information Meeting is not required. Asivisory Decion nel: � IGI. The proposed project does not have to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel as it does not require a Development Permit. d) Interdepartmental' Implications: Pro Mana ment Committee: In the Silver Valley Area Plan, which forms part of the Official Community p lana subject property has been designated for Neighborhood Park. As such, the District, portion of the acquiring that portion. s an interest in At a Closed meeting on June 12, 2006, Council authorized staff to enter into owner -that would allow the District to acquire the portion of the subject procan agreement with the , for park in exchange for a portion of neighboring District owned roe p which is designated have been proposed cut of which 7 lots are equivalent to the " P p � (the subject site). 8 lots " land in exch lot will cover the expenses that the applicant will incur for all the off -site wanks and the eighth rezoning process. Although the agreement has not been finalized to date, now that t e lot potential as part of the and related service requirements on the District owned property are largely determine expect to finalize the exchange agreement in the near future. d, the parties -3- Engineerin De artment: The Engineering Department has the following comments: Collector standard road required on 236t' Street (with curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, sanitary sewer and storm water drainage), north of 133r 1 Avenue to the south boundary of the subject property. No road dedication and water main is required as part of this rezoning as it is being provided by phase I of a subdivision (SD/081/08) proposed at 13396 233rd Street. No Geotechnical concerns and DCC forgiveness possible for the subject site. Lot 8 to be created from this subject property cannot be created unless road and servicing is dedicated and constructed on the adjacent land to the south through the phase II subdivision servicing for the subject property (following rezoning) proposed at 13396 2331d Street. Fire De aQ rtment: The Fire Department supports the elimination dead-end roads such as Rocky Ridge i Drive s to provide a better neighborhood connectivity, public safety and efficient emergency response Bui&n De artm nt: The Building Department does not see any out -standing issues with the proposed rezoning and recommends that a preliminary site grading plan and geotechnical reports may be required at the subdivision stage. Parks &Leis re Services De va m P.nt: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified the need for this .park in relationship to the existing houses in this area and the land swap allows the park oe a quire fining the street direct purchase. When the subdivision is completed they will be responsible trees which will be assessed prior to subdivision approval. CONCLUSION: The proposed rezoning is with the intention of exchanging zoned land with the applicant. The applicant has agreed to exchange land with the District, in the form bdivision proposed tr13396, 233� ezoned land oStBreetlots lfoth s "Park" lot which will be created in phase-11 of a rezoning is not approved for any reasons that the Council feel are appropriate, the District will have the option of buying the "park" land outright. ME Prepared by. Rasika Acha rYa, B k.--.! M-Tech (Ping.), UD (SFU) Planned ved MClP Qire Planning APPraved by; Fr k Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & r ent Services 9 , —�) Concurrence. I L. Chic RA/dp 1) Rule ministrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A, - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6489-2007 Appendix C - Site Plan -5- P 2409 7 6 Rem 3 P 3007 7 1 �3i0Q 6 13300 133$Z rs 5 13310 4 sr. 133003 a ss 153sn 2 — BCS 577 co • t333B,a0 RP 1804A P 15218 District of _ Pitt Meadows; - _a i r" District of Langley SCALE 1:3,000 Rem 2 L MP 35466 24 22 n 9 24 � �.34� 8'�aaa 232 `' �� •3p s r� A 'i 20 •� 7 dQL �. C 19 A v CO 18yiSAl ,0� 17 '9 3 30 1 +0 3733 3 r 1335 !pZ 12 13 3 16 2 11 iZ 14 033a3 V 1133a! 10 15 1 -- 8 0 8. L 7 'k, 6 � 5 4 3 x3Ya1 2 x3ra3 1 2V45 74 3 t 1 zl�% 1 115 Q in",ii 44 tV Cn 1 117 13310 18 2 1330169 o . LOTN TOSHIPP 12, PLAN 2637 CORPORATION THE DISTRICT C T MAPLE RIDGE MAFjE PLANNING DEPARTMENT a� BN � DATE: Aug 23, 2006 FILE: SD/081106 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO, 6489-2007 A Bylaw to amend Ma of Zoning Bylaw No, 351p "A for�g Part 1985 as amended. 1985 WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend � mended; Maple P Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - Ridge, in NOW � ORE, the Municipal Council of meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: the Corporation of the Dis 1. LLOWS: trict of Maple This Bylaw maybe cited as „Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6489- That parcel or tract of land and r 2007. Lot 8 P emises known and described as: North East Quarter, Section 28, Township 12 and outlined • ' Nei' Westminster Plan 263 7 forms m heavy black line on Part of this Bylaw, is hereby Map No. 1398 a co Density)y rezoned to RS-1 b PY of which is attached hereto and Residential anvil (One Family Urban (Medium Maple Ridge Zoning are hereby Bylaw No. 3510 - amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of PUBLIC HEARING held the day of READ a second time the day of READ a third time the day of RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY 1985 as amended and Map °A attached thereto ADOPTED, the A.D. 200 • A.D. 200. , A.D. 200. A.D. 200. day of , A.D. 200. CORPORATE OFFICER 2.023 ha. P 2409 7 p 2637 EV Rem 3 l , 1 2.023 ha. p 3007 LMP 52339A�� Ln UD N /17 16 MAPLE RID GE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6489-2007 Mo No. 1398 .1 Rural Residential) ROAD 25 18 /* �� 23654 26 Pa 19 .r Vl0. 20 �F ) 3659 �,,—� �� 2 30 21 s 0- 1 36�6 3 6 P RS-3 (One Fame y From: Residential) To: RS-1 b One Family Urban (Medium Density12h i MAPLE RIDGE 1;1500 r W LL. 10.0❑ 20.11 LOT 1 LOT 2 1:1000 10.00 ZON ING BOUNDARY 8 RS-1 B (LOT 8) LOT 7 T Rem8 1.56 'ho Plan 2637 SITE "N • 3 z v 0 134 AVE 134 AVE E&Mw 9Cr9 M 18 g � i Fr ` MAY 2007 ZONJOING PLAN I... LOT 1 /-a-j w� 141.83 p� F' I ::D� LL.� 10.00 1 10.00 8 7 " 55&0 m2 J. (LOT 8) .7 g 6 29. r9 . K 55&0 m2 Rem.8 8 5 40 M2 W 1.56 ha wi 5W•0 m2 Plan 2637 zM?2•zr -- En 32. t6 -- 39 to N R g g = 55 m2SITE _ Ml2-2r 32. to - 8 h .3 5%0 m2 �..� --....___- 20.11 .� 8 8 �. 27o r27r 5W.0 m2 '■ FUTURE bOTS,".1, 592.0 m2 , 37 g 609.3 m2 3010 i65 % IM 70 134 AVE ,r ----------- RE ■ � N MAY 2007 LOT 2 1:100.0 LOT 7 .' 134 AVE SUBDIVISION PLAN DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: March 21, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/033/08 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6621-2008 10366 240 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District). RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6621-2008 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following term(s) and condition(s) be met prior to Final Reading. i. Registration of a Geotechnical Report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; ii. A Statutory Right -of -Way plan and Agreement must be registered at the Land Title Office for the construction of a sanitary sewer; iii. Road dedication, as required; iv. Consolidation of the remnant lot with the development site to the east, application RZ/063/09, to prevent creating a non -conforming lot; V. Removal of the existing building/s; vi. Pursuant to the Contaminated Site Regulations of the Environmental Management Act, the applicant will provide a Site Profile for the subject property. 1102 IDI6Yfl1b39[0►A a) Background Context: Applicant: H.Y. Engineering Ltd. Owner: Gurinderjeet S. Toor Sukhjinder K. Toor Legal Description: Lot A, Section 3, Township 12, Plan 13554 OCP: Existing: Medium Density Residential Proposed: Medium Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation Medium Density Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Designation: Medium Density Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Medium Density Residential West: Use: Multi Family Residential Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: 6475 m2 (1.60 acres) Access: Proposed 240A Street and proposed rear lane Servicing: Full urban servicing will be provided Accompanying Applications: SD/033/08 and RZ/SD/DP/063/09 b) Project Description: The subject property is in total 0.649 ha in size; however, the current application applies to the western portion only, which totals 0.413 ha. The current application proposes to rezone the western portion of the property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), to permit future subdivision into 9 single family residential lots. The eastern portion of the site, totalling 0.236 ha, is encompassed- in the rezoning application RZ/063/09, which proposes a townhouse development under the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Zone. This application is currently at Third Reading. -2- The subject property is bound by residential development in all directions; the adjacent property to the south was the subject of a recent rezoning to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), under application RZ/093/04, and was subsequently granted subdivision approval under application SD/075/07. The current application is a continuation of that subdivision and is proposed to closely match the lot areas and dimensions of those approved lots. The applicant proposes to extend 240A Street and the rear access lane provided by the southerly development, to provide access to all proposed new lots. The subdivision to the south has yet to be developed, therefore, the current application can provide necessary services only when the south development commences. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject property is located within the Albion urban area and is therefore subject to the policies set out in the Albion Area Plan. The proposed rezoning to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) is in accordance with the subject property's designation as "Medium Density Residential" in the Albion Area Plan. Zoning Bylaw: The R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone requires a minimum lot area of 213 m2; a minimum lot width, with lane access of 7.9 m and a minimum lot depth of 27 m. The 9 proposed single family lots comply with the above requirements of the Zoning Bylaw as follows; • Areas range from 274 m2 to 315 m2 • Lots widths range from 9.14 m to 10.5 m • Lot depths are all 30 m Development Permit: Pursuant to Section 8.8 of the Official Community Plan, an Intensive Residential Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal provides emphasis on high standards in aesthetics and quality of the built environment, while protecting important qualities of the natural environment. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has provided the following comments: 1. There are no services to be provided by this rezoning application; Servicing Agreements are in place for the development to the south (RZ/093/04 and SD/075/07). The timing of construction of services for this proposed rezoning and subdivision application will be dependant upon the construction of the southern services. 2. DCC Bylaw No.6462-2007 includes a highway item for road works on 240 Street. This will be reviewed at the subdivision stage after receipt of the servicing design. -3- 3. At the subdivision stage, there might be Latecomer Charges payable to the development to the south (SD/075/07). 4. Three metres wide road dedication is required across the property frontage. 5. A Development Variance Permit will be required to support retaining the above ground utility company plant that fronts this property along the east side of 240 Street. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be additional trees added to the street tree inventory. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that there is maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree which will affect their operating budget. CONCLUSION: This proposal conforms to the Albion Area Plan of the OCP and is working with neighbouring lands and applications to develop in a logical pattern, it is therefore recommended that Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6732-2010, and that application RZ/033/08 be forwarded to Public Hearing. Prepared by: Michelle Bast ,Plannln�TeTlcian , MCIP ❑ire��f Planning Approved by: /Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng- GM: blic W rats & Devel p1ment Services Concurrence: J. L. (YM) Rule Chief Administrative Office The following appendicesiare attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6621-2008 Appendix C - Site Plan Appendix D - Building Elevation Plans Appendix E - Landscape Pans IZ! N SCALE 1:2.000 District of Pitt Meadows —••• ' 'Sllrx H 111 �J District of Langley d,P vwl■y � I _ I I Afhmn 10366 240 STREET MAPLE RIDGE &a'sn calumbia 104 AVE. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: May 8, 2008 FILE: RZ/033/08 BY: PC Appendix B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.6621-2008 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6621-2008." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot "A", Section 3, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 13554 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1443 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 231d day of November, A.D. 2010. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. u: �. CORPORATE OFFICER 01 / .. r� /r J m11 r rrr 14750 i rr 1 4 �QD-;J r� r �✓ P 22743 P 14750 �G. �,' r✓ q Rem 7 8 �' rr 0.674 ha rr / 0.518 ha 1. r 10420 I 23.1 1 N wyy N N 104 AVE. N ry t❑p IS-- � 4 ❑V. M � ti � ti Pcl. M N A B Rem D B 7 4 (J130089E) P 21769 NWP7139 P 13554 0014 P 11176 P 9393 0.409 ha ? ha 0.405 ha 0.649 ha 1a.�e� A 13554 0.647 ha Pd. 1 1o358g -t&Lq�—E g RP 9100 10.�s28 171o349 � BCP 36407 23.1 0_ 103467Q 16 10343 m 1.87 ha 10351 10340A ,r, 15 10337 19 ha F 103.i25 n 14 f0331 2 1T0O3-i2282 4 13, t 103360325 EE! � 12 10319 N 0.405 ha 10316'2M 11 10313 20.0 LMP 48057 10310 1 10 10307 PARK 10337 103 AVE. IR ARK BCP 3!� 0.893 ha P 60014 1 P 8149 Rem 1 M 5 7 7 0.405 ha M No. 1 44- SpOC!CI A n e nity 'C--S!u"?! ilcl L..'ISt: !%L, � :z000 Appendix C v � y � '�n cn. � �EL 0 0 Uc w O < z CN 5 � a- O r-)W0Q `-D Q U� �j D Q O I rr, �- -J O Q O Q < 0 l u yy a� 33 3 3 Appendix D '3Ab COM33a1S d OVZ @ '9ns S1O16 E2 m v0.LU T, 40 g IHP w n z Gig h fil r — I �l V ml 1l: h _I �I slll �� ;I 1u-.awaud_ 133HS ?AAOJ Appendix E 1 J111�11 Eo8 o cgs -to 's i 9 N i E u _ Z LU 5- W F-Q a_ Z Z (% �O zw LU g y Z of gZ5 and ZU¢ O airW 0 z z W 5 5 s o�.�—...— � Z Z U U `■■F U .3 i s a co to4zn E0 MOM — O peoa pasodad I 6 a L 9 I O I �3 z I I LU � r }� Iz- = r! aaw � I all I Z S IF I s �► r �s 4' III I i I I L _ 1AL I rh ij C; NVId JNUNVId 3dVOSONVI D s 0 ZdaWill �`d1 ` pp pp 5CI m 8 } J � m l l # .. R.- z ZU ! all ! LL w a g w� > wYw Zg IL U co i I I I. Z £ 5 �i I enrt is 410 If 188JIS Loon NVId SN|iNV]d 3dVOSONV]OfO EO/dl )12 PRIM )� Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6805-2011 Legal: Sec.23, TP: 9, Plan: BCP24827 (No Civic Address) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: March 21, 2011 RZ/081/10 CofW An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to CS-3 (Recreation Commercial). The proposed use for the subject property is road and outdoor commercial recreation (golf). The intent of this application is to facilitate the road alignment for the Golden Ears Bridge. A portion of the site is to be used for the road, and the remainder will be transferred to the adjacent golf course as partial compensation for lands for the Golden Ears Bridge Project. The subject site is within the Agricultural Land Reserve hence approval from the Agricultural Land Commission was required as the proposed use is considered a non -farm use under section 20 (3) and for subdivision under section 21 (2) of the Agricultural Land Commission Act. The Agricultural Land Commission has approved this non -farm use recently, provided the proposed subdivision is completed within three years from the date of approval. This property straddles the municipal boundary of Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge. It is anticipated that, rather than doing two separate subdivision plans for portions of the lands within both the municipalities, a common Subdivision Plan will be signed by the Approving Officer of Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows, once the portion of land within Maple Ridge is rezoned to the CS-3 (Recreation Commercial) zone. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6805-2011 be given First Reading. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Howard Consulting Limited Owner: South Coast BC Transportation Authority Legal Description: Parcel A, Part NW 1/4, District Lot 246&263, of PCL 1 EP17262 OF PCL N EP13129; BCP: 24827; PID: 026-771-691 OCP : Existing: Agricultural Zoning: Existing: RS-3 One Family Rural Residential 1103 Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Outdoor Recreation & Agriculture - Pitt Meadows Zone: AGC (Agriculture and Golf Course) Designation Outdoor Recreation & Agriculture - Pitt Meadows South: Use: 2 properties, farm and public utility (Translink property) Zone: RS-3 One Family Rural Residential and One Family Urban Residential Designation: Agricultural and Residential East: Use: Farm Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Agricultural West: Use: Outdoor Recreation & Agriculture -Pitt Meadows Zone: AGC (Agriculture and Golf Course) Designation: Outdoor Recreation & Agriculture -Pitt Meadows Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: b) Site Characteristics: Road and vacant fragment Road and Golf Course 1.55 hectares (3.8 acres) no direct access At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. A preliminary Environmental Report dated October 2010, was submitted by Hatfield Consultants, to address the history and current conditions for the subject site owned by TransLink. This site, historically known as Bellingham property (actively used for agricultural purposes only, until 2007), most of which is under City of Pitt Meadows jurisdiction, also includes a smaller portion within Maple Ridge, which is roughly 1.55 hectares in size. A more detailed review will need to be done once all the comments are received from referrals that will be sent after Council grants First Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require further reports. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject site, zoned RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), is designated "Agricultural" as per the Official Community Plan and lies within the Agricultural Land Reserve. Applications within the Agricultural Land Reserve are generally not supportable based on the policies of the Official Community Plan. However, as this application is for an existing golf course and a public utility use (Abernethy Connector) that is being administered by a senior government agency (Translink), the application has community benefits that have generally been supported by the Agricultural Land Commission. The consolidation of this property with the golf course is likely preferable to leaving it as a fragment that would have limited options available for agriculture so the Agricultural Land Commission recently approved the non -farm use (extended golf course) application. WIM It should be noted that similar applications along this corridor have been supported by the Commission, and this particular application has been included in the dialogue between these senior agencies prior to being received by the District of Maple Ridge. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to CS-3 (Recreation Commercial) to facilitate the road alignment for the Golden Ears Bridge and add the remainder portion to the existing Golf Course. The portion of the site that is to be used for road is considered a public utility use. TransLink will hold this portion of Abernethy Connector as a fee simple lot, which is anticipated to occur with the subdivision approval. The portion of the site that is to be consolidated with the golf course requires it to be rezoned to CS-3 (Recreation Commercial) zone to permit an outdoor recreation use. The proposed zone CS-3 (Recreation Commercial) requires a minimum lot size of 0.4 hectares and the subject site is roughly 1.55 hectares, out of which approximately 0.79 hectares is anticipated to be subdivided off for the existing Abernethy Way connection, leaving 0.76 hectares to be consolidated with the golf course in Pitt Meadows. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.5 of the Official Community Plan, a Commercial Development Permit application is not required as there are no structures proposed on the subject site. d) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) Ministry of Transportation; and f) City of Pitt Meadows The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. -3- CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the Official Community Plan and the Agricultural Land Commission is supportive of it, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant First Reading. A portion of the site will be subdivided off to provide a roadway, and the remaining fragment is proposed to be consolidated with the adjacent golf course in Pitt Meadows. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. The proposed Subdivision Plan is anticipated to be forwarded for review and approval to the District of Maple Ridge's Approving Officer, in the near future. Prepared by: Rasika R arya, B-Arch, M-Tech, LID, LEEDS AP an er Appro d by ing, MCP, MCIP Dir or of Planning Approved by. Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng., GM: Public Works & D`eveldpment Services Concurrence: J; L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendibes are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6805-2011 M Appendix A ------------------------------------- SUBJECT PROPERTY BCP 24827 EP 17262 Pd. A Rem 1 13 30587 2 10 1 j IQ, J2 12495 9 ' 14 39 A 12 �� J � 15 12491 846s aa9� ¢ aq�@ 16 38 102 �o r?io 17 37 1A. 12463 7 aP 18 36 re'v �9 12457 �� 19 35 i� '-;40 6 20 BC 87 34 124s1 21 33 Pd. A 5 12441 12442 32 4 22 31 r�� - ays� 46 12431 12434 l2 47 12445 Ch f Pitt j ROLL #21164-0203-0 r o CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF NDistrict0f .� l �� fMAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE Langley PLANNING DEPARTMENT �� s `: SCALE 1:2,500 -L' 4 DATE: Mar 11 2011 FILE: RZ/081/10 BY: PC F ASER q. - Appendix B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6805 - 2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6805-2011." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot A Except: Firstly; Part subdivided by Plan LMP45462 Secondly; Part subdivided by Plan BCP16025 Thirdly; Part Parcel A (Statutory Right of Way Plan BCP24939) Fourthly; Part Parcel B (Statutory Right of Way Plan BCP24939), District Lot 223, 224, 246 and 286 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan LMP4786 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1514 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to CS-3 (Recreation Commercial). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER City of Pitt Meadows acP 24827 EP 17262 Pd. A i r' / Rem 1 13 BOP 30586 30587 10 � 9 11 As> ra 12495 14 39 ' vs per^ 12 �$ 15 � f 12491 84sy ti�e� 'act 16 38 p ' 17 J r 37 p., 12463 7 ra 18 / 4 36 ri 42457 19 35 p •v 20 B 8734 L/\/// 112461 5 6Cp 21 33 'sue ' \ A 32 �p ' 73 12441 1 4 011 12442 22 iAS ^. j- MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6805-2011 Map No. 1 51 4 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: CS-3 (Recreation Commercial) 40 65 N f % EP 35731 JJ /f 1❑ r� m m u1 6 2p2 �s m r1 v 103 u1 7 N d 7 a20225 102 20205 A8 6 12461 5 12451 9 12450 LMP N SCALE 1:2,500 1 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: March 21, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: DP/095/10 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W SUBJECT: Development Permit 11176 Gilker Hill Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Multi -Family Development Permit application has been received for the site for a 51 unit townhouse dwelling in twelve buildings, zoned RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). The Multi -Family Residential Development Permit establishes the form and character of multi -family development, with the intent to enhance the existing neighbourhood with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs and minimize potential conflicts on neighbouring land uses. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DP/095/10 respecting property located at 11176 Gilker Hill Road. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Bluetree Homes (Gilker Hill) Ltd. Owner: Bluetree Homes (Gilker Hill) Ltd. Legal Description: Lot A, Distirct Lot 404, Plan BCP17360 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Proposed: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RM-1(Townhouse Residential) Proposed: RM-1(Townhouse Residential) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation Urban Residential and Conservation South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Urban Residential 1104 West: Use: Multi -Family Residential and School Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and P-1 (Park and School) Designation: Urban Residential, Conservation, and Schools Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Access: Servicing: Lot Size: Previous Applications: Accompanying Applications: b) Project Description: Vacant 51 unit townhouse development Gilker Hill Road and Lane to the South Full Urban 1.27 ha (3.14 acres) RZ/032/03, DP/032/03, and VP/032/03 DP/109/10 and VP/095/10 The site is an undeveloped treed lot, approximately 1.27 ha in size, and is located to the north-east of the intersection of Gilker Hill Road and Kanaka Way. It is bounded by Gilker Hill Road to the north and west, an undeveloped treed lot to the east, single family residential homes to the south-east, and a lane serving single family residential homes to the south. The site was zoned RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) in 2005. The current development application proposes a 51 unit townhouse development in 12 buildings, with the main access to the northern 35 units from Gilker Hill Road, and a secondary access to the southern 16 units from a lane south of the site, connecting Gilker Hill Road to 236 Street. The townhouse units are three and four bedroom units, in three level buildings with ground access. The units fronting Gilker Hill Road have a two -storey street frontage, each with a front entrance to the street. Each unit is provided with two required parking spaces, either through their own garage, or through a single car garage with a surface parking stall. Fifteen visitor parking stalls are provided for the site; four more than required by the Off -Street Paking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990. Due to the steep site, height variances are proposed for all of the buildings, noting that, with the exception of Building 1, all of the buildings are two storeys and lower than the maximum height permitted on'the high side of the property. Due to the falling grade, Building 1 is three storeys, and height calculations for the buildings on the lower side of the property are higher than the permitted 10.5 metres. Setback variances are also proposed, with the reasoning that the buildings have been arranged to provide an active streetscape with front porches and front doors facing the street. The reduced setbacks proposed for some of the buildings are for the porches in order to strengthen the streetscape. A report recommending approval of Development Variance Permit VP/095/10 has been prepared for Council consideration. A common activity area is provided in the south-western area of the site, with a stand of existing trees that is proposed to be protected through a restrictive covenant. Planning Analysis: A Multi -Family Residential Development Permit is required for all new multi -family development (three or more dwelling units per building) in an area with an Area Plan. Section 8.7, Multi -Family Development Permit Area Guidelines of the Official Community Plan aims to regulate the form and character of development located within this area. This development respects the key guideline concepts as outlined in this section: 1. New development into established areas should respect private spaces, and incorporate local neighbourhood elements in building form, height, architectural features and massing. -2- The form and character of the buildings is directly related and in context with most of the surrounding townhouse and single family homes within the neighbourhood. The buildings are ground -oriented and offset to prevent the buildings from directly facing existing homes to the south and east. 2. Transitional development should be used to bridge areas of low and high densities, through means such as stepped building heights, or low rise ground oriented housing located to the periphery of a higher density developments. All of the buildings fronting onto Gilker Hill Road to the north incorporate grand front porches with decorative tapered columns and front doors accessible to the street. Relatively low-pitched roofs are incorporated in the east -west direction with steeper gables in the north -south direction, all designed to minimize building height and maintain view corridors. The roof forms facilitate an animated streetscape of varying gables, shed roofs, porches and front entries. 3. Large scale developments should be clustered and given architectural separation to foster a sense of community, and improve visual attractiveness. Some of the buildings, whose ends are more prominent, are provided with special design treatments that include projecting bays with additional glazing, gable details, shingle siding and trimwork. The building design is configured in response to the site topography, thereby minimizing the number and height of the retaining walls throughout the site. The uphill buildings all have the main floor of the unit with level grade garden access to the north. The downhill units all have a daylight basement level with access to a lower balcony, or access to a garden terrace. 4. Pedestrian circulation should be encouraged with attractive streetscapes attained through landscaping, architectural details, appropriate lighting and by directing parking underground where possible or away from public view through screened parking structures or surface parking located to the rear of the property. The site is located at the base of the hill, and different levels will afford excellent views of the neighbourhood and school site. Designs will allow for framed views, with some plantings for privacy. Arrangement of the walls, slopes and plants will help maintain a level of screening between units on the site and adjacent homes. Slopes will be carefully sculpted to also maximize the light and space adjacent to homes. The landscape design along Gilker Hill Road will complement the traditional streetscape with the use of boulevards and front yard trees, hedges, shrubs and ornamental picket fencing found in many established neighbourhoods. Surface parking stalls will be screened with planting and landscaping. Hardscape materials will be high quality and visually interesting, and relevant to the character of the architecture. Retaining wall layouts will utilize curves and arcs to soften the effect of the sloped areas and natural colour blocks will assist in blending in with the hillside environment. An amenity space has been carefully developed to fit with the slopes, and create visible but private spaces for active and passive use. In addition, this location maximizes views to the southwest and provides green buffering and visual interest along lower Gilker Hill Road and the surrounding neighbourhood. A tot lot is combined with a hard surface patio to allow for a variety of functions. The amenity area has been positioned to achieve maximum light and views, and will be directly accessible from the upper and lower levels. A cluster of existing 3 trees around the amenity area will be carefully preserved and pathways and plantings will work around these trees to fit with existing slopes. c) Advisory Design Panel: The plans were reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel at the December 14, 2010 meeting. The Panel was in support of the project as submitted but requested some revisions to increase pedestrian connectivity, to enhance the landscaping in certain areas, and to review material transitions and define unit entries. The applicant has revised the design to the satisfaction of the Advisory Design Panel and the Planning Department. d) Environmental Implications: The site generally slopes down from north to south, with slopes that are generally flatter at the top and bottom portions of the site, and steeper slopes in the central third of the site. Based on the Geotechnical Investigation and Slope Stability report prepared by Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd., dated December 24, 2010, shallow slope movements have been occurring, and the movements are attributed to a dark grey layer of clayey silt with nodules formed due to long term creep movements of the slopes. It is recommended to remove this layer during the site preparation and grading design and to replace it with structural/engineered fill, up to the foundation/design grades. The shoulder on the south side in the eastern portion of the site also shows signs of instability, and it is therefore proposed to remove the unstable soil and replace it with compacted structural fill. No watercourses were identified onsite. In addition, no raptor nests or signs of nesting activities were observed and there are no known locations of species at risk within the study area. The proposed development is surrounded by urban development and has limited wildlife habitat connectivity; therefore, it is unlikely that rare and endangered species would occur onsite. Tree retention is proposed in the southwest corner of the site. This area will be required to be a no - disturbance zone through all aspects of construction and landscape finishing. Clearing, grubbing, and excavation of the site will be done during the drier months, starting in April, pending a final wildlife survey to ensure raptors will not be endangered by construction activities. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been engineered to prevent the release of sediment even during adverse weather. TERA Planning Ltd. has reviewed the stormwater, landscape and environmental management plans and confirms that the plans are designed to high standards adapted to a steepland site such as this site. The grading, terracing and drainage are constructed to provide a stormwater management regime that, in turn, can support the landscaped greenbelts and lower vegetation at the lane to the south of the site. e) Citizen/Customer Implications: A Development Information Meeting was held on January 15, 2011. The main issues expressed by the attendees are summarized below, in addition to the response from the developer and/or the Planning Department. • Increased traffic and safety risks in the lane south of the site The typical situation if there were single family houses on both sides of a lane like this would have about 30 houses using the lane. Having a total of 32 dwelling units (the 16 existing houses and the proposed 16 townhouse units) accessing the lane is not out of the ordinary. An updated Traffic Assessment for the proposed development considered three options to address the concerns around the lane: Option 1 - Enhanced Signage: No changes to the existing arrangement, i.e. allow all movements, but install warning signs indicating restricted visibility. Option 2 - Left Turn Restrictions: Prohibit left turn exit movement form the lane to Gilker Hill Road southbound by installing a no left turn sig at the west end of the lane at Gilker Hill Road. Option 3 - One Way: Convert the western section (i.e. west of the proposed access) of the lane to one-way eastbound (i.e. all vehicles exiting onto 236 Street) with a no exit sign at the west end of the lane and appropriate one-way road signs along the lane. Based on the concerns that Options 2 and 3 would inconvenience selected residents, Option 1 was selected as the most practical solution. In addition, road widening and intersection improvements on Gilker Hill Road at the lane and at Kanaka Way, which were incorporated into Council's requirements for servicing works when the property was rezoned, will be constructed by this developer. • Lack of parking in the area The parking provided for the development exceeds the Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990 requirements. There are 15 visitor parking stalls (four more than what is required by the Bylaw) and 102 resident parking stalls provided. Street parking is not required to service the development and is not available on Gilker Hill Road. • The development is too dense The site was zoned RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) in 2005. The allowed density under this zone is that all buildings and structures shall not exceed a floor space ratio of 0.6 times the net lot area, excluding a maximum of 50 m2 of habitable basement area per unit. The proposed floor space ratio for the development is 0.54, less than the 0.6 allowed. • Concern about slope stability during and after construction The Provincial Building Code and local bylaws regulate development on slopes for stability and site safety. The site development program proposed ensures slope stability is maintained throughout construction and after build -out. A geotechnical engineer has provided a report documenting the site and outlining a strategy to stabilize and develop the site in a safe and professional manner. This strategy was subsequently peer reviewed by a second, independent geotechnical engineer, who concluded the approach was sound and in keeping with good engineering practices. The geotechnical engineer will be monitoring all construction on the site. • Concern about water drainage/management through construction and after build -out The developer has worked with Wedler Engineering and Valley Geotechnical Engineering Services Ltd. to design an effective stormwater management plan that manages 100% of stormwater onsite, as per District requirements. Additionally, an Erosion and Sediment Control program will be followed throughout construction. f) Financial Implications: A refundable security equivalent to 100% of the estimated cost of landscaping for the Multi -Family Development Permit will be provided by the developer to ensure that the street townhouse development is carried out in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on estimated landscaping costs, the security will be $221,578.00 for the landscaping, plus $70,040.00 for a two-year maintenance period, for a total security of $291,618.00. There will be 16 trees added to the municipal street tree inventory on completion of this project. The costs associated with maintaining these trees will need to be included in a subsequent operating budget. g) Alternatives: The site was zoned RM-1 (Residential Townhouse) in 2005. The proposed development meets the Multi -Family Development Permit guidelines, with the exception of the variances requested for height and setbacks, which are summarized in the accompanying Development Variance Permit Report VP/095/10. If the variances are not approved, the applicant will have to re-evaluate the development, explore ways to meet the Zoning Bylaw, and consider what compromises would be feasible. Some of the options may include changing their desired design approach and reviewing their grading plan. Depending on the options chosen, other implications for the development, such as modifications to the engineering drawings with regard to service locations, may arise. If the variances are not approved, a new Development Permit application will be required as the proposed development will likely be much different from its current form. CONCLUSION: As the development proposal complies with the Multi -Family Development Permit Area guidelines of the Official Community Plan for form and character, it is recommended that DP/095/10 be given favourable consideration. Prepared by. Michell st, ASCT � Planning letnician MCIP Approved by: rank Quinn, MBA, FlEng YM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: /Chief J. L. (Jim) Rule Administrative Officer The following Gppendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Site Plan Appendix C - Building Elevations Appendix D - Landscape Plans -6- t5353 ARK _..,r Rem 19 P 35398 Pd.'A' LMP26965 1 :P29907 45 r a 11160 City.Qf Pit-1 Meadows Appendix A 7 e2 6 , SCP t1251 LMP 36163 1 CP 410t 9 11 11237 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 t 0 11 22 m v 1 1 N N P 39988 112AAVE d12 i1 IE 16 15 14 t3nl 11240 11230 n 11231 11232 21 22 111 1 6 11226 11227 a 11226 20 23 111 � 2 g ,0 11220 11221 11222 19 -4 11t N 3�10 11216 18 2511! 11216 d 11217 4 11 11212 17 26 111 j SUBJECT PROPERTY j e 11210 11211 27119 'Q �rZO 5 t2 112 AVE 1 P 11206 6 nzo7 28112 `O CP 42841 j n2oo 7 t3 3 , J 14 �15 N16 29 1121 //.ep,BCP BCP 42842 BCP 21397 m95 10 tt 11187 9 11179 � 8 i 22 21 2p SC t2 3 U 7 242 23 0 _ 19 '18 �i1 1 m 6 11163 m Rem 25 N 77t;5 +11 AAVE R 26 r5� 12W3" i4�3Z`,5 7 8 9 P loll J5 1 1 2 3 y B P 1 21 7 2 55 6 7 8 rn 2 �` KANAXA WAY y LMP 5 � PA �` ! c 11176 GILKER HILL ROAD - + 0 CORPORATION OF i THE DISTRICT OF 4 to MAPLE RIDGE N District of j� - Langley ` -- . PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2.500-- - _Y= DATE: Nov 2. 2010 FILE: DP/095/10 BY: PC _ _ = FRASej R- _-_ - Appendix C th 61, -1 , MAI` I I -A n n Nk. I go — 1 mb, 0 11 Arl, = z 0 i. ii --I L-L z Fla mall J11,411 Oii ZR 'IMUNI, 14, � a e 9 d F d i i R Tj n d e d d 4 x A n Ui mo I, All, t z 1. I r. M-- z w I m -- t i I 7 I li� 41 All ilk I'M .. .......... . . - - - - - - - - - - ..... . 2TY m Omni 2 'E Ht oil Ea I NI, I I WN LO -- MINE, yC W F � J 02 � m 2 S = W="S W o'er � m ■., wr Nm = Z'ZI BENS 33S 8 4€ 4. R.$€€ R aoaaaeo;eeee;se;eee y $ a a a i a a a a a a a a $ RAA RfiA X$fi RX AF AAAAfifi $ fi$"$="^n�F 5 m m m m m m m g a E a s elilt! I S MIA 4 e • � � yy d � I� � i ^96 Appendix D IL r• ;- � ea �g a H;§�a� a e s`s a § p •" = J = 3 �- � q LU Wn3 $"yag taw a F � a W a W Y� m MJ co ?@-e a8c99gq3 °a6 azppg a ]g] J_8 n i3s£ Fria HC'd8[5[ kttl3 _, ` V' n ¢ m.... N G MAPLE RIDGE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE or Wish cotumbla TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: March 21, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: DVP/095/10 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Cow SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit 11176 Gilker Hill Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Development Variance Permit application has been received in support of Development Permit application DP/095/10 for the above -referenced property to vary the maximum height and the setbacks to address the steep slopes and irregular site geometry. The variances to the setbacks proposed are consistent with variances proposed for other similar projects and very similar to a previous development permit application for this site which expired. The building height relaxation is a direct result of the steep interior site slopes that exist on this RM-1 zoned site. RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/095/10 respecting property located at 11176 Gilker Hill Road. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context Applicant: Bluetree Homes (Gilker Hill) Ltd. Owner: Bluetree Homes (Gilker Hill) Ltd. Legal Description: Lot A, Distirct Lot 404, Plan BCP17360 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Proposed: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Proposed: RM-1(Townhouse Residential) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation Urban Residential and Conservation South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) and RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Urban Residential 1105 West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Access: Servicing: Lot Size: Previous Applications: Accompanying Applications: b) Project Description: Multi -Family Residential and School RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and P-1 (Park and School) Urban Residential, Conservation, and Schools Vacant 51 unit townhouse development Gilker Hill Road and Lane to the South Full Urban 1.27 ha (3.14 acres) RZ/032/03, DP/032/03, and VP/032/03 DP/095/10 and DP/109/10 The applicant is proposing a 51 unit townhouse development in 12 buildings on the zoned RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) property. The buildings have been arranged to provide an active streetscape with front porches and front doors facing the street wherever possible. The reduced setbacks proposed for some of the buildings are proposed for the porches in order to strengthen the streetscape. Due to the steep topography of most portions of the site, building height variances are proposed. However, with the exception of Building 1, all of the buildings are two storeys and lower than the maximum height permitted on the high side of the property. Due to the falling grade, Building 1 is three storeys, and height calculations for the buildings on the lower side of the property are higher than the permitted 10.5 metres. To try and reduce the massing of the buildings, an extremely low roof pitch (4 in 12) has been applied. A Natural Features Development Permit is required for the tree conservation in the south-west corner of the property. A Multi -Family Development Permit is required for the form and character of the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) buildings. c) Planning Analysis: The Zoning Bylaw establishes minimum and maximum regulations for the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. This flexibility can allow an applicant to sensitively fit a project to a challenging site such as this one. d) Requested Variances to Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw: The siting requirements, as specified in Section 602 6 SITING, are as follows: All buildings and structures shall be sited not less than: a) 7.5 metres from a front, rear or exterior side lot line; and b) 4.5 metres to an interior side lot line for a wall with no windows to a habitable room or 6.0 metres for a wall with a balcony or a window to a habitable room. The height requirements, as specified in Section 602 7 SIZE OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, are as follows: a) All buildings and structures for two family residential and townhouse use shall not exceed a height of 10.5 metres nor 2 1/2 storeys. The following table summarizes the variances requested for each building: Building Proposed Maximum Proposed Proposed Required Number Height Height Setback Setback to Setback (m) (m) Allowed (m) to Eaves (m) Building Face (m) 1 11.75 10.5 3.13 2.48 7.50 2 13.10 10.5 - 6.05 7.50 3 14.30 10.5 - - 7.50 4 11.65 10.5 3.12 2.48 7.50 5 11.65 10.5 3.08 2.48 7.50 6 14.00 10.5 - - 7.50 7 12.00 10.5 5.21 4.69 7.50 8 12.00 10.5 5.21 4.69 7.50 9 13.50 10.5 - - 6.00 10 11.75 10.5 6.43 5.07 7.50 11 111.80 10.5 - 4.98 6.00 12 1 12.10 10.5 5.72 4.60 6.00 In addition to the above -requested variances, the applicant is requesting a variance for Section 602 8 OTHER REQUIREMENTS: c) All buildings for two family residential use or townhouse use shall be sited so that there will be a continuous 90 degree horizontal arc unencumbered by buildings on the same lot of a radius not less than: i. 15 m from the centre of all required windows in a living room Buildings 10 and 11 are less than 15 m from Buildings 3, 6, and 9; however, the grade difference between the upper and lower buildings is approximately 10.5 m, and therefore, will not result in direct viewing living room to living room or any infringement on privacy. The applicant's justification for the variances is that the existing site is extremely steep and irregularly shaped and the development makes every effort possible to arrange the buildings to provide an active streetscape with front porches and front doors facing the street. Relatively low-pitched roofs are incorporated in the east -west direction, with steeper gables in the north -south direction, all designed to minimize building height and maintain view corridors. All of the buildings are ground -oriented and slightly offset in an attempt to respect the privacy of existing residences. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: Residents to the south of the proposed development have expressed concern over the height of the proposed buildings. Because of the existing steeply sloped site, the proposed buildings appear to be three storeys in height facing the residents to the south. The applicant has attempted to mask the scale of the development by enhancing the landscaping along the property lines, providing tiered landscaping throughout the site, and orienting the buildings so that they are not directly facing the residents to the south or east. f) Alternatives: If this application was not approved, the applicant would have to re-evaluate the development, explore ways to meet the Zoning Bylaw, and consider what compromises would be feasible. Some of the options may include changing their desired design approach and reviewing their grading plan. Although -3- discouraged, the applicant could propose significantly more retaining walls to falsify grades, which would result in a far less attractive landscape and site plan, and negatively impact the look of the project from below the hill. Depending on the options chosen, other implications for the development, such as modifications to the engineering drawings with regard to service locations, may arise. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed height variances have been reviewed with consideration to site conditions of steep slopes. This site was pre -zoned RM-1 (Residential Townhouse), and has had a number of earlier designs which were not as well executed as this proposal. The setback variances are considered to be acceptable to provide an active streetscape. It is therefore recommended that Council approve Development Variance Permit VP/095/10. Prepared by: Michelle Bast, AScT Planning Tedpnician CP, MCIP ng Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PE �GNI: Public Works. & Development Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer MB/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Site Plan Appendix C - Building elevations -4- 15353 ARK Rem 19 P 35398 Pcl.'A' LMP26965 :P29907 45 a 11160 11120 N SCALE 1:2,500 �upxAy 11-1 7 Appendix A car 9a 11251 1 1 LMP 136163 i1 P 41 9 11 11237 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 it 22 m v 1 1 11 P39988 112AAVE a-12 11 16 11' � 14 13 n1 ,12a0 11230 w 11231 11232 21 22 11 T20O1'3 1227 a11226 20 231221 ,222 19 24 111 11216 18 25 ni 1217j ,1z,z n 2s ,1jSUBJECT PROPERTY i 111" 27 I72 "� ----------- J 62'n 2 AVE 28 I7ll 11zo7/1195 13/14 3 $ P 42841 N -15 y16 29 112J y BCP 42842 11195 BCP 21397 10 11 1187 9 r ITT79 11171 7 22 21 20 BC 12 53 m 1163 23 24 23so � � 111 ss 0 Rem 2 N 17145 111 AAVE it 26111.15 12 11725 15'"� 27 �T4�33�t2�11 E3N4'Sa 1'115 � 1 � P M P 7 8 9 1011 12 N4 � 1 2 3 P 1 853 21 7 2 4 5 6 7 8 rn KANAKA WAY S y f23�4ms.g 6ry y7 y8 9M07'. 5r 12 21 t 13 t�oa � o f 20 1 A tt Ya 191t rr�6 >>° r7ose 1 18 5 r i7 15 PA - 14 LMP CIt-Y4 Pitt 1 _-j "�ead°"'S•3 T' i = 11176 GILKER HILL ROAD ME -- CORPORATION OF} _ I THE DISTRICT OFMAPLE RIDGE District of f �' PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley 0-.I DATE: Nov 2, 2010 FILE: DP/095/10 BY: PC -= FRASER R. _ E ■� Appendix B ' F It 00 �4 4 4 394 .. _ _.. � _ _� ��p�q eLL ~ �-tom R� 3R-rrc^ - -•_.— �- -i r r 11 I. � _ 9 � Y` �� -_ 'h • �� ~, �.; ~ � '�`�� 'ems: - - - �0- - SNIL n lj `` �• s m ilk Ln '➢ ---_-_ ■y�= 'I p' gY %t. Ir -� jrr� i a r) Q) 60 LLJ Jill V pr ............. = i L N Q X Wq � jI�K T Appendix C , { I kL itl'�i! �pJ I y !N4 NRI� �i�Mt F ! ail1 7 a i G kill� fiii! =ik __ �YliliY�s::zdecettn�: O � Q y tu s1 zV (� J IBM, bgBE i t ( L G • ; 5 3 � a 4 It Y s z � M �a r' e 5 - i � J y L � • l f FP e " 0 WER, Im IkA wv I m 7 z IF t IWO I it, z O -. tul• I NES-1-11 C95 I o 7 Qi C% .1 I ell H'1 C � i?� ■y 7 i I � �{ � I z Il.� i � IImI�II I sa � p�� Iye I Z' F Q R w� �NQIS r� I' I• i� I' �+ IFl {.I FF � k�l16cH7pRl��{ff 11 al ��p�K:�iayseo:zi MAPLERIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer DATE: March 21, 2011 FILE NO: E05-010-052 MEETING: C of W Award of Contract Storm Sewer Replacements (Reference No. ITT-OP10-197; Project No. E05-010-052) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Storm sewer replacements on 123 Avenue, Rogers Avenue, 122 Avenue, and Eagle Avenue (map attached) were identified in the 2011 Capital Works Program. The project will upgrade sections of obsolete storm sewers and includes installing a number of inspection chambers and re -sloping some driveway ramps to improve drainage at the road and private property interface. The project was tendered on January 17, 2011 and the tender period closed on February 10, 2011. Nineteen tenders were received. The lowest compliant bid was submitted by Pedre Contractors Ltd. at $355,572.50 (excluding taxes). Staff has reviewed the tenders and is recommending that the project proceed. Accordingly, Council approval to award the contract is recommended. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Contract (Reference No. ITT-OP10-197; Project No. E05-010-052) 230 Street Storm Sewers Replacement (123 Avenue, Rogers Avenue, 122 Avenue, Eagle Avenue), be awarded to Pedre Contractors Ltd. in the amount of $355,5.72.50 plus applicable taxes; and THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Over the past years, a need was identified by staff and residents to upgrade storm sewer system in the area bounded by Greenwell Street and Gee Street, on 123 Avenue, Rogers Avenue, 122 Avenue, and Eagle Avenue. To address the need, Council approved funding for these improvements in the District's 2011 Capital Budget. The work involves replacement of five sections of storm sewers, installation of a number of inspection chambers, and re -construction of some driveway ramps. 1106 The District engaged AECOM Engineering to perform the analyses and design the project. Subsequently, the project was tendered on January 17, 2011. Tender results Nineteen tenders were received and opened in public. The five lowest tender prices are listed below, from lowest to highest price (excluding taxes). Tendered Price Pedre Contractors Ltd. $355,572.50 Universal Contracting (651432 BC Ltd. dba) $370,839.38 Tag Construction Ltd. $404,237.00 Sandpiper Contracting LLP $412,306.00 Fournier Excavating Ltd. $416,071.20 AECOM and staff reviewed the tenders received and recommend the award to Pedre Contractors Ltd., who submitted the lowest compliant bid of $355,572.50. b) Desired Outcome: The desired outcome of this report is to obtain Council approval to award the contract and proceed with the storm sewer and drainage improvements. c) Strategic Alignment: The Corporate Strategic Plan has directed staff to manage municipal infrastructure including roads and sewer through infrastructure plans. The plan to upgrade this system has been developed and it is now appropriate to complete the construction. d) Citizens/Customer Implications: The project will improve storm water drainage in the area. Staff met with area residents in September 2009, prior to the analyses and design of the system. An Open House was held on February 24, 2011 and the feedback was positive. Construction will commence soon after the project is awarded and attempts will be made to minimize the impact to everyday traffic, residents, and businesses in the neighbourhood. The road is expected to remain open to traffic throughout the construction. e) Interdepartmental Implications: The Engineering Department has worked closely with the Operations Department in developing the project. f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The 2011 approved Capital Budget provides sufficient funds under LTC 2221 and LTC 8516 to complete this work. CONCLUSIONS: The tender price of $355,572.50 (plus taxes) by Pedre Contractors Ltd. for the project is the lowest tendered price. Council approval to award the work to Pedre Contractors Ltd. is recommended. Prepared by: Velimir Stetin Project Manager Finane" Trevor Thompson, CGA Concurrence: Manager of Financial Planning Reviewed by: Afidrew Wood, PhD., PEng. Municipal Engineer Approved by:,, Frank Quinn, MBA,-Eng. GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer VS/mi MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 21, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001 Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W 2011 Heart and Stroke Big Bike Ride EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request has been received from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of BC & Yukon to use municipal streets for the 2011 Big Bike Ride on Thursday, April 28, 2011 between 2:00 pm and 8:00 pm and on Friday, April 29, 2011 between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm. A copy of the request is attached. Road closures are not anticipated for this event. Authorization from Council is requested to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge. RECOMMENDATION: THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the 2011 Heart and Stroke Big Bike Ride on Thursday, April 28, 2011 and Friday, April 29, 2011, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule 'A' attached to the staff report dated March 21, 2011 are met. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually given on condition that the Municipality be indemnified against any liability for injury or damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as "Schedule A". The ride route will start at the Haney Place Mall parking lot at 226 Street where the riders will travel northbound on 226 Street to McIntosh Avenue and continue to Edge Street to Dewdney Trunk Road. They will travel east on Dewdney Trunk Road to Burnett Street and travel southbound on Burnett Street to Lougheed Highway. They will travel westbound o Lougheed Highway to 225 Street and northbound to Selkirk Avenue returning to Haney Place Mall parking lot at 226 Street. 1107 b) Strategic Alignment: Permitting of Maple Ridge street events promotes community development and often highlights Maple Ridge's natural and built features. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Permission to use streets may cause some minor delays and inconveniences to other road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the Big Bike Ride volunteers. d) Governmental Implications: The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain approval of the RCMP and Fire Department for traffic control and must notify BC Ambulance Services as well as coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. f) Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices. g) Alternatives: The District could refuse to permit the event to occur at this location. In this event, the organizer may have to cancel the event. However, this event has a history in this community. CONCLUSIONS: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of streets for various events and activities. The Big Bike Ride for the Heart and Stroke Foundation has been held in Maple Ridge in past years. The organizers have requested permission to hold the event on municipal streets for 2011. Submitted by: Andrew Wood, PhD., PEng. Municip Fngineer Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng. QVI. Publ`c Works & Development Services 1. . el]L Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rble ` Chief Ad inistrative Officer Schedule 'A' To Council Memorandum Dated March 21 2011 2011 Heart and Stroke Big Bike Ride Conditions of Approval Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers: 1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the RCMP, Fire Department and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District); 2. notify local Ambulance Services of the event; 3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; 4. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date); 5. notify all affected businesses on the event route as soon as possible (per letter provided by the District); 6. make arrangements for all surrounding businesses and residents for access purposes during the event; 7. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any way connected with the event; 8. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District." Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; 9. obtain the required permission from Haney Place Mall to use their facilities; 10.refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the District; and 11. must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw this permission to use municipal streets should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements. Chief Administrative Officer 02-15-11;04:51PM;Hart and Sroke foundation ;bU4 4/2 UUbb ?F 1/ I HEART& STROKE POUNDATION OF SC & YUKON Finding answers. For life. Tri-Cities/Fraser Valley Office 2239C McAllister Avenue Port Coquitlam, B.C. V3C 2A9 2/15/2011 T 604.472.0045 F 604.47Z0055 Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Fax: 604-467-7425 Attention: Ruby Tam Traffic Technician/Safer Cities Re: 2011 HeartSSfrokc Rig Bike TwRide Heart&Stroke Chair Dear Rub Paid/ $GOR Y Preddint & CEO 6obbe wood I am writing to request permission for a fundraising event to take place in Maple Ridge on T1lursday, April REGIONAL OFFICES 28th, and Friday April 29"', 2011. Please review and approve the proposed route by signing this letter on Kamloops the appropriate signatory line (below) and returning by fax to 604-472-0055. We have applied for the 250.372.3130 insurance and will fax the certificate to you once received. We have also advised The Police, Fire Kelowna Department, Ambulance and BC Transit of This event. 25OA60.6275 Ninalmc TS........ r1L�.. A-11 —__r '— r Route Description: Sties: � at'Hanc a ia��. a•anai panning ,Ot by Haney Place & Antique Mall 250.754,5274 Left on 226th North Vancouver 604.903A492 , Proceed on 226'h until it turns left into McIntosh Prime George Right on Edge St. 250.562.0611 Right on Dewdney Trunk Rd 6 4 04.279.7279.7130 Continue on Dewdney until Burnett PL-;ht On 13t:r',fe : Furray 604.591.1955 Right on Loufheed Hwy Tel -Cities Right on 225' , into Haney Place Mall parlang lot 604.472.0045 ,Right on Selkirk and continue until left into parking lot starting point V&neauvey 604.731.4000 _ vlcterla 250.392.4035 For more heart and stroke Information: www.heartandcdoke wC Ca 1.888.NSF.INFO (1.088.473.4636) This event involves our thirty-scatHcart&.Sfrokc Big Bike and we will be scheduling rides between 2:OOPM and 8:00PM on April 28th and 9:OOAM and S:OOPM April 29`h.. This has become an extremely successful fundraising event in the province of BC and has had very generous support of the community and we look forward to your continued support. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. $inc sly, " (Z�� Lori Whalley Special Events Coordinator, Serving Tri-Cities & the Fraser Valley T #t:604-472-0045 F #:604-472-0055 6uslness number 11081 8343 RR0001 Corp. of the District of Maple Ridge concurrence of the above proposed event: Authorized Signature Date: 03-15-11;11:50AM;Hart and Sroke foundation 02-09-11;04:24PM;Hart and Srok.: founcation HEART& STROKE 5��' A L Pn FOVNDATIOr[ j OF BC 4 YVKON 1 '`•poing answers. Forllfe, 2/9/2011 Tr;-Citlea/Frazar Valley Office 229C McAlfiator Avonus dge-Meadows Municipal Tia�� Port CaquWam, 9.C, phone; 604467-762Q v3C 2A9 / Pacsimile:60"67-7•S33 f T 6t14.472.0045 P 61M.02.0055 Rcr:.�.011 Ileart�SrnkeBig,3ikr °H ;604 472 0055 0 2/ 2 ;604 472 0055 0 1/ 1 Heart&Stroke Dear: I am writing to reCJuast permission for a fundraising event to inl a place in Maple Ridge on ThuxNday April 29f4 and Frida.r April 1914, 2011 and aek for yc sr as: ismncc. Please, review and approve the proposed route by sirmag chit letter on the appropriate sipatory lino below and returning by fax to 604-472-0055. Once RCMP approval is complete, wr will forward all the information to the cnal. District of Maple Rid7c for their approval for this event. Peter Seat( PP—SI anon dceo RubtLcft Route Description: Start 2• Haney place Mall paeling tot b ; Hancy Place b' Aatiquc Mall zn 226th QlmoN.1. orrlcrc Proceed on 226"' until it turns left int? McIntonh Ket.INP. Z�.a,z sear Right on E.dgc St. K.le.-.n- Righ; on Dewdney Trunk Rd 2So.a40.6275 Continue on Dewdncy until Bulrnen N-ndma .50.7ses274 R.igb: on Burnett Rigb. on Loupeed Ilwy o4..vu3.402 Vqf Right on 225 , into Haney I'lat:o Ma; l parking lot Prince Gearne Right on Sellark oad continue •anti) l,:ft into parlang lot NoTting point zso.aez.eett , ale„�^•^b This event involves (W thirty -seat HeartdStroke Sib .dike .nd we will be scheduling rides botween xre'nso 2:00PM and 8;00PM on April 28 ' and 9:OOAM end 8:00PM on April 29dL We would be most �,a,sat.tass appreciative if the RC-1-2 wov1d be able to provide a police car to act as an escort car for our rides. If T,I�sI„ requirod, we can pro%iIc a more detailed schedule closer to -lie event. if this is not pozvible we can e04.472.0045 provide out own escort vehielc. Veneew-, 604.736,40ee This has become t+n crnrmely successful fundraising event in the province of BC and we look forward 2so o'a.,.ots to your continued support. If you have any questions cr rccj6re additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, RCMP Concurro e f r tha above proposed Traft Corvo41:'lan: Lori Whalley Special Events Coordinator. .Authorize-d Signature Swing Tri-Cities & tst: Fraser Valley T#:604-472.4045F#,604-472.0055 For mare hears and stroke Inlonnauon: 6 t. ► C i jt74' "L ( �w 44585 P �' www.heartanayolL �e-cm 1 88H SFJN 0 ^^ /� SgL P N a% A Q A I -A 61- ou51neb5 number 11867 8343 Ra000t PPPW 0 F__ 604-736-8732 Heart & Stroke Foundatl 13:12:32 p.m. 10-03-2011 1 11 Ref. No. 320006311761 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Aon Reed Slenhouse Inc. 900 Howe Street Re: Evidence of Insurance with respect to the following: P.O. Box 3228 Event: Heart & Stroke Big Bike Ride Vancouver BC V613 3X6 Dale(s): April 23, 2010 fel 604-6884442 fax 604-6824026 Location: Maple Ridge, BC Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Insurance as described herein has been arranged on behalf of the Insured named herein under the following policy(es) and as more fully descnbed by the terms, conditions, exclusions and provisions contained In the said policy(les) and any endorsements attached thereto. Insured Heart $ Stroke Foundation Of B.C.& Yukon 1212 West Broadway, Suite 200 Vancouver, BC V6H 3V2 Coverage Commercial General Liability Insurer Royal & Sun Alliance Ins Co of Canada ............. .------------ ............................................................................................................. ......................... Policy# COM034700520 ... ......................... ................. Efiecgvrr 01-Sep4010 Expiry 01-Sep-2011 Limits of Liability Bodily Injury & Properly Damage, Each Occurrence $5,000,000 Tenant's Legal Liability - All Risks $260,000 Policy may be subject to a general aggregate and other aggregates where applicable Additional Insured Only with respect to the above and arising out of the Named Insured's operations are the following name(s) added to the policy as Additional Insured(s). The policy limits are not increased by the addition of such Additional Insured(s) and remain as stated in this Certificate. Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge where required by written contract or written agreement with respect to Commercial General Liability Cancellation I Termination The Insurer wig endeavour to provide THIRTY ( 30) days written notice of cancellation/termination to the addressee except that statutory or policy conditions (whichever prevails) will apply for non-payment of premium. THIS CERTIFICATE CONSTITUTES A STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AS OF THE DATE OF ISSUANCE AND ARE SO REPRESENTED AND WARRANTED ONLY TO Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, OTHER PERSONS RELYING ON THIS CERTIFICATE DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK. Aon Reed Sten ouse Inc. Dated : 10-March-2011 Issued By: Cheung,Loreha S Tel : (604) 443.3335 THE POLICY CONTAINS A CLAUSE THAT MAY LIMIT THE AMOUNT PAYABLE 1 of 1 OR, IN THE CASE OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE, THE POLICY CONTAINS A.PARTIAL PAYMENT OF LOSS CLAUSE AQV Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Race the Ridge 2011 Bike Race EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DATE: March 21, 2011 FILE NO: E01-035-001 MEETING: C of W A request has been received from Cycling BC to use municipal streets at three venues for the Race the Ridge 2011 Bike Race on Saturday May 7, 2011 between 3:00 pm and 8:00 pm, and Sunday May 8, 2011 between 8:00 am and 2:00 pm. A copy of the request is attached. Authorization from Council is requested to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge. RECOMMENDATION: THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the Race the Ridge 2011 Bike Race on Saturday May 7, 2011 and Sunday May 8, 2011, provided the conditions of Schedule 'A' attached to the staff report dated March 21, 2011 are met. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: From time to time, the Municipality is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for organized events. Unless there are some unusual safety implications, approval is usually given on condition that the District be indemnified against any liability for injury or damage resulting from the event. The conditions of approval of the event are attached as "Schedule A." The three venues for the Race the Ridge 2011 Bike Race are as follows: 1. Golden Ears Park Time Trial - Saturda Ma 7 from 8:00 am to 11:00 am This race will take place in Golden Ears Provincial Park and will start and finish at the main gates. Traffic control will be provided. (Information only - BC Parks permit is pending) 2. Town Core Criterium -Saturday May 7 from 3:00 prn to 8:00 12M This race will take place in the Maple Ridge town core and will start and finish on McIntosh Avenue at 224 Street. Participants will travel west on McIntosh Avenue turning south onto 223 Street, travel south on 223 Street to 119 Avenue traveling east on 119 Avenue to 224 Street and travel north to Haney Place Loop. This wiii be the feature event and will utilize Memorial Peace Park. 1108 108 This event will require the following road closures: • Haney Place road; • 224 Street, between Selkirk Avenue and Dewdney Trunk Road; • 223 Street, between 119 Avenue and Dewdney Trunk Road; • 119 Avenue, between 223 Street and 224 Street; • McIntosh Avenue, between 223 and 224 Street; and • Fraser Street, between Haney Place road and Dewdney Trunk Road. 3. Road Race - Sunday May 8 from 8:00 am to 2:00 pm Start and finish will be at Thornhill Hall on 98 Avenue. Participants will travel west on 98 Avenue to 256 Street, travel north on 256 Street, turn west on 100 Avenue and turn north on 248 Street, travel east on 102 Avenue to 100 Avenue and proceed south on 268 Street to 98 Avenue. From 98 Avenue they will travel west to 264 Street, turn north to 98 Avenue, travel west to the finish line. There will be no road closures. However, this event will require that the traffic be stopped as riders start and finish and at intersections as riders pass through. b) Strategic Alignment: Administrating Maple Ridge street events allows the District to manage road infrastructure and associated risks but yet allows events that promote community development, commemorate and celebrate community accomplishments and highlight Maple Ridge's natural and built features. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: Permission to use municipal streets may cause some minor delays and inconveniences to other road users. However, traffic control will be provided by Race the Ridge volunteers. In addition, the organizers will be distributing an information letter to affected businesses and residents. d) Governmental Implications: The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP for traffic control and must notify the Fire Department and BC Ambulance Services as well as coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. f) Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices. g) Alternatives: The District could refuse to permit the event to occur at this location. In this event, the organizer may have to cancel the event. CONCLUSIONS: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events and activities. Race the Ridge Bike Race has been held successfully for previous years and the organizers have requested permission.to hold the Race the Ridge Bike Race on municipal streets for 2011. Submitted by: Akidrew Wood, PhD., PEng. Municipal Ef er y Approves' by. Fra Quinn, MBA, PEng. Ge era] Manaw: Pu�blicW�orks & Development Services Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) ule Chief Ad inistrative Officer /mi Schedule `A' To Council Memorandum Dated March 21, 2011 Race the Ridge 2011 Bike Race Conditions of Approval Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers: 1. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the R.C.M.P., and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District); 2. notify local Fire Department, and Ambulance Services of the event; 3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; 4. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date); 5. notify all affected businesses on the event route as soon as possible (per letter provided by the District) ; 6. make arrangements for all surrounding businesses and residents for access purposes during the event. A time interval schedule of closure and permitted vehicular access during the event for residents wishing to access their property; 7. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any way connected with the event; 8. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District.,, Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; 9. obtain any the required permits/permission from other agencies; 10. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the District; 11. must maintain access for emergency services to the closure area at all times. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw this permission to use municipal streets should the organizers rail to comply with the above requirements. Chief Administrative Officer Race The Ridge Bike Race Attention: Barry Lyster 22459 132"d Ave. Maple Ridge, BC V4R 2P6 604-466-2016 or 604-312-3318 EVENT INFORMATION Building on the success of hosting eight years of quality bike racing, I will again be hosting a 2-day, 3-event road bike stage race event in the District of Maple Ridge. I will again be requiring road closures and municipal support. Please find the information required for the permit below. The courses will be exactly the same as in 2010. Thanks again for supporting cycling in our community. Sincerely, Barry Lyster Director of Cycling Operations Local Ride Bike Shop/ Race The Ridge EVENT INFORMATION Date: May 7, 8 - 2011 Location: Maple Ridge Predicted Participation: 200 per event Number of events: 3 Web Site: www.localride.com Insurance: 5 million liability from Cycling BC GOLDEN EARS PARK TIME TRIAL (information only, BC parks permit is pending) Date: Saturday, May 7, 2011 Time: 8 am to 11 am Location: Golden Ears Provincial Park Start/Finish: Main Gates, Golden Ears Park Staging Area: Main horse corral parking Proposed Course: (see map) Road Closures: None Traffic Control: Traffic control will be at the Start/Finish, the turn -around point and at Mike Lake Road, Boat Launch road and Day Use area road. TOWN CORE CRITERIUM Date: Saturday, May 7, 2011 Time: 3 pm to 8 pm Location: Memorial Park and 1 square block west of 224`" Street (see map) Start/Finish: 224th Street and McIntosh Ave. Staging Area: Band Stand, Memorial Park Proposed Course: (see map) Road Closures: 224`h Street (Dewdney Trunk Road to Selkirk Avenue) 223`d Street (Dewdney Trunk Road to 1191h Avenue) McIntosh Avenue (223`d Street to Leisure Centre) 119`h Avenue (223`d Street to 224`h Street) Ring Road around Memorial Peace Park All alley ways and vehicle access points. Traffic Control: This will be a closed course to vehicle traffic. Course marshals will be at all major intersections and alley ways. Barricades, traffic cones and race tape will be used to separate vehicles and pedestrians from the race course. Local residents will be permitted through the closed off areas between races and when directed by course marshals. MAPLE RIDGE ROAD RACE Date: —"�tC _-, S.awfday,'May, 8, 2011 Time: 8 am to 2 pm Location: Start/Finish: Thomill Old Thornhill Elementary 100th Ave. @ 256th Street Staging Area: Old Thornhill Elementary Course Length: 10 km Road Closures: None Proposed Course: Roads Used: (See Map) 256`h Street, 100`h Ave., 248th Street, 102nd Ave., 268`h Street. 96 Ave. 98th Ave, Race will follow a clockwise direction. Traffic Control: Traffic will be stopped by course marshals as riders enter and exit course corners. Race in progress signs will be situated around the course and at all roads leading into the race course. There will be no permanent road closures and there should be minimal impact to traffic. Race groups will be accompanied by a lead and follow vehicle as well as a wheel vehicle. We will attempt to notify as many residents as possible to inform them of the event. We have also contact the Auxillary Police and will be hopefully using their services again this year. G W h� C) n 9 3L CL l (U j5 zm1 0 0 0 C) Q) y� .: Yf P—Q rep 0 m E I... 0 l� L F�1 cn �Z o p � M Ln M cu a MWI Access Co M4 S LL zl EZZ 222od St 2226 'it "Mm r- . CM .St Q] �J C 4- 1> .0 I ' eA 5? � C. a err }}�� 26A . ±1 iylhl stCD 7 rn -� d 0 1 I ? C7t p Q �r J t.f0 y 11 MAPLE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: March 21, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer Disbursements for the month ended February 28, 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council has authorized all voucher payments to be approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor and a Finance Manager. Council authorizes the vouchers for the following period through Council resolution. The disbursement summary for the past period is attached for information. Expenditure details are available by request through the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION: That the "disbursements as listed below for the month ended February 28, 2011 now be approved". GENERAL $ 5,775,971 PAYROLL $ 1,566,516 PURCHASE CARD $ 9k253 $ 7� DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan. b) Community Communications: The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial disbursements. 1131 c) Business Plan / Financial Implications: Highlights of lar er items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution • Double M Excavating - Sanitary sewer extension $ 801,279 • G.V. Water District - water consumption Nov 3-30/10 $ 322,611 • G.V. Water District - water consumption Dec 1-31/10 $ 339,776 • ICBC - 2011 fleet insurance renewal $ 161,306 • Sandpiper Contracting Ltd. - 256 Street watermain replacement $ 270,901 • Tag Construction Ltd. - Abernethy Connector realignment $ 159,838 d) Policy Implications: Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice. CONCLUSIONS: The disbursements for the month ended February 28, 2011 have been reviewed and are in order. Prepared by: G'Ann Rygg Accounting Clerk II Approved by: Tr r T ompson, CGA Manager of Financial Planning ff �Jkl 4. Approved by. Paul Gill, BBA, CGA GM - Corporate & Financial Services k • - Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer gmr CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - FEBRUARY 2011 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT 0752281 BC Ltd Security refund Aecom Canada Ltd 230 Street drainage M REC feasibility study River Road storm sewer Spencer Creek Pump Station Alliance Painting & Decorating GMYC interior painting Andrew Sheret Ltd Plumbing supplies BC Hydro Hydro charges Feb BC Hydro Payment Control Dept 240 Street pole relocation BC SPCA Contract Jan & Feb Community Animal Centre development - 50%share Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd Maintenance: Greg Moore Youth Centre Electrical Kiosk for Cutler sewerage pumpstation Hammond Community Centre Haney House Street lights Whonnock Community Centre Works Yard Xmas decorations Bynett Construction Services RCMP jail cell renovations CUPE Local 622 Dues - pay periods 11/02 & 11/03 Canadian Lawn Care Services Cemetery Columbaria Plaza Chevron Canada Ltd Fuel Mar Double M Excavating Ltd Sanitary sewer extension to Correction Centre Downtown Maple Ridge Business 50% BIA funding Fitness Edge Fitness classes & programs Feb GM Nameplate Canada Utility box wraps Greater Vanc Water District Water consumption Nov 3 - Nov 30/10 Water consumption Dec 1- Dec 31/10 Guillevin International Inc Fire fighters' equipment Fire fighters' protective wear Operations electrical supplies Happy Heart Fitness & Educ Weight room supervision & childcare activity room ICBC - Fleet Insurance 2011 fleet insurance renewal Imperial Paving 216 St & 128 Ave roadworks Downtown road & utility rehabilitation Roadworks ITT Water & Waste Water Cliff Avenue pump station Jacks Automotive & Welding Fire Dept equipment repairs M2K Construction Ltd North Alouette River Greenway Bridge abutments Vernon Trail Bridge replacement Manulife Financial Employee benefits premiums Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council Art Centre grant Feb Program revenue Jan Theatre rental Tourism campaign Volunteer coupons Medical Services Plan Employee medical & health premiums Microsoft Licensing, GP Annual software licensing MJT Enterprises Ltd Skating lessons Mobilecom Radio Company Fire Dept voice pagers Municipal Pension Plan BC Employee benefits premiums PW Trenchless Construction Inc 256 Street sanitary sewer extension AMOUNT 91,400 6,610 5,568 3,420 1,197 16,795 15,820 16,998 100,037 123,105 52,305 92,459 349 21,207 331 82 3,015 318 106 9_439 322,611 339,776 1,439 8,412 5,520 40,974 21,596 5.805 120,505 18,173 46,392 16,235 2,742 218 200 144,764 27,840 21,637 21,127 24,489 61,779 801,279 81,750 24,878 16,213 662,387 15,371 17,872 161,306 68,375 37,727 17,023 138,678 124,864 65,788 29,328 103,146 22,587 22,730 304,535 110,061 Janitorial services Jan & Feb Raincity Janitorial Sery Ltd Receiver General For Canada RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ridgemeadows Recycling Society Sandpiper Contracting Ltd Stak Fitness Tag Construction Ltd Terasen Gas Union Of BC Municipalities Warrington PCI Management Wedler Engineering Young, Anderson - Barristers Disbursements In Excess $15,000 Disbursements Under $15,000 Total Payee Disbursements Payroll Purchase Cards - Payment Total Disbursements February 2011 Firehalls 12,634 Library 11,636 Municipal Hall 5,862 Operations 5,901 Pitt Meadows Police Community Office 448 Randy Herman Building 8,829 RCMP 6,320 51,630 Employer/Employee remit PP11/03 & 11/04 733,671 Industry Canada radio license renewals 2,380 736,051 Ice rental Jan 55,648 Monthly contract for recycling Feb 90,216 Weekly recycling 383 Litter pick-up contract 1,848 92,447 256 Street watermain replacement 270,901 Leisure Centre fitness equipment 17,173 Abernethy Connector realignment 159,838 Natural gas 31,910 2011 annual dues 16,203 Advance for Tower common costs Feb 50,000 Tower expenses Jan 44,777 94,777 256 Street sanitary sewer extension 33,529 Professional fees Jan 17,230 PP11/03 & PP11/04 GMR \\DOVE\CorpServ\Finance\Accounting\Accounts Payable\AP Remittances (Disbursements)\2011\[Monthly_Council_Report_2011.xlsx]FEB'11 5,069,027 706,944 5,775,971 1,566,516 90,253 7,432,740 MAPLERIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer 2011 Community Grants DATE: 21 March, 2011 FILE NO: ATTN: Committee of the Whole EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: For the 2011 fiscal year, a budget of $65,075 has been established for community grant purposes. In previous years Council committed to providing grants in 2011 to the Alouette Home Start Society and the Salvation Army family emergency shelter totaling $11,975. This leaves $53,100 to be allocated toward other requests. Staff has reviewed other grant requests received in relation to Council's Grants Policy and recommend the distribution shown on the attached Schedule "A". RECOMMENDATION(S): That the proposed distribution of grants as shown on Schedule "A" of the staff report dated March 21, titled 2011 Community Grants be approved. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The grants budget of $65,075 was established to assist organizations that provide valuable community services. Due to fiscal restraints, it is often not possible to provide the level of support that is requested so an effort is made to ensure that the available budget is distributed where it will benefit the community. For 2011, some of the available budget has already been committed as a result of Council decisions in previous years. The agreement entered into with the Alouette Home Start Society in 2005 provides for a grant to offset property taxes to support their work with youth. Without this support, the society would not be able to leverage the federal funding necessary for the operation of the Youth Safe House. The amount of this assistance is estimated at $5,000. In 2010, Council agreed to provide the Salvation Army a total of $9,300 over two years to assist with the costs of renting space for a homeless shelter for families. In 2011, this assistance will amount to $6,975. After these commitments, $53,100 is available to accommodate additional requests and the following are recommended. The Friends in Need Food Bank, the Salvation Army and the Alouette Home Start Society receive monies from other levels of government. These revenues help the organizations with their service goals but additional grant monies from the Municipality will help to offset the pressures of rising costs coupled with decreases in provincially distributed funding and increasing demand for the services they provide. In 2008, Council committed to providing the Agricultural Association with $12,000 annually for three years to assist the Association host their annual Country Festival. The Association is requesting this commitment be renewed for an additional three years. Staff is recommending that support be provided for 2011 with support for additional years to be reviewed in 2012. 1132 In 2009, Council committed to providing the Haney Farmers Market Society with a total of $10,000 over two years to help with their efforts to promote the Farmer's Market. While the results realized from that grant helped increase the economic viability of the Market further efforts are needed to ensure that trend continues. The Society has requested $6,000 annually for two years as bridge funding while looking for long-term sponsors and partnerships. Staff is recommending a one-year commitment of $6,000, with support for additional years to be reviewed next year. The Family Education and Support Centre's Community Kitchen program helps local citizens living below the poverty line learn how to prepare affordable and nutritious meals as well as providing a place of social contact and information about community resources. In the past, the program has received funding from financial institutions' community funding streams, but this funding has been cut. The Municipality is being asked to provide bridge funding of $4,000 to help the program continue until other funding can be secured. The Maple Ridge Historical Society has requested a grant of $3,000 to help them purchase display cases that meet current conservation standards to better preserve and display Maple Ridge' historical treasures. The Society is currently using display cases that were intended for use in a retail environment and are not suited for museum use. The Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Community Services has requested $4,000 to assist them with a volunteer promotion and workshop series to be offered to organizations interested in securing more sustainable and diverse sources of funding. Staff is recommending that $2,000 be provided to assist with this program. As in other years, a community fireworks event is planned near Halloween. While some monies may be raised through sponsorship, a municipal contribution of $2,500 is recommended. As per Council's Financial Support Policy, organizations that are denied permissive tax exemptions are considered under our grants policy. In 2010, the Royal Canadian Legion and the Ridge Meadows Hospice Society were denied permissive tax exemptions for the 2011 tax year, as they did not meet the criteria outlined in our policies. As a result that review staff have determined that the Ridge Meadows Hospice Society does not qualify for a grant either but are recommending that the Royal Canadian Legion be provided with $2,500 to assist them with their efforts in providing supportive housing to the community's senior citizens. In addition to the amount available for community grants, financial support is provided to a number of local organizations in the form of fee for service agreements. The operating departments manage these agreements, and the associated budgets. Organizations currently participating in fee for service agreements include Adopt -a -Block, Alouette River Management Society, the Kanaka Education & Environmental Partnership Society, the Youth & Justice Advocacy Association and Ridge Meadows Search & Rescue. b) Desired Outcomes: Organizations, such as those identified on Schedule "A", are faced with shrinking resources and increasing demand for the services they provide. Through the use of community grants Council is able to help such organizations continue with the provision of services to the residents of Maple Ridge. c) Business Plan / Financial Implications: The distribution of community grants proposed on the attached Schedule "A" allocates $64,475 to various community groups. This amount is provided for in the 2011-2015 Financial Plan. There are no other financial implications. d) Alternatives Council could choose not to distribute any grants other than those previously committed to, but as that decision may jeopardize the ability of various organizations to continue providing necessary services that is not recommended. Alternatively, Council could increase the budget to meet all of the requests. This is not recommended, as such discussion should take place as part of our business planning cycle. CONCLUSIONS The provision of grants to local organizations benefits the citizens of Maple Ridge. The distribution proposed on Schedule "A" attempts to allocate the limited resources to provide benefit to the community. Prepared by: Catherine Nolan, CGA Manager of Accounting Approved by. Paul Gill, CGA GM Corporate & Financial Services Approvi?d+by. K Iy SrWift GASOhmunity Development, Parks & Recre ticSn� r Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer ti � •� x � p � o i o � '� o m w lu w,toO 'N 01 o� O U � � •� to U y y � _ Q �. � ZL c7 c� p O 0� y Q •� •� C 16) Q Q o� o •� c '.�. '� o� o" p o o o� o o y o �� q h O O Q O O O O v) O O l" O O O O O O 6 O O O O O O O Ln ON Ln h o d o 0 b � N � O t,9-Cl f+3 er D m n v � ti ti � y O U � U � R x a o C7 "Cl Ci Q O O O O cy y y C Q o i � dzt �7 Z2 Q Iz tl • i i ti 3 L' Q xL � O E� � D E� FL �] ty Crt City of Pitr Nieadovv✓ Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: W.1101TA SUBJECT: The Mayor & Council of the DATE: March 21, 2011 District of Maple Ridge and City of Pitt Meadows J.L. (Jim) Rule, CAO, District of Maple Ridge Jake Rudolph, CAO, City of Pitt Meadows Appointment of Directors - Pitt Meadows Airport Society Place RECOMMENDATION: That the resolution attached to the report dated March 21, 2011 as Appendix II be adopted; and That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign the Special Resolution of the Society attached as Appendix III; and further That a Councillor be appointed to represent the municipality at meetings of the Directors of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society. BACKGROUND: As both Councils are aware, the Pitt Meadows Airport is owned by the Pitt Meadows Airport Society ("the Society") whose members are the District of Maple Ridge and the City of Pitt Meadows, who are represented by their respective Council appointee, and the Mayor of each community. The directors, who are appointed by the four members, have the collective responsibility to run the affairs of the Society in accordance with the constitution and bylaws and to act in the best interest of the membership. While the members attend meetings of the directors, it is the directors who have the voting authority to make decisions on the operation of the Airport. One of the key responsibilities of the two municipalities and the two mayors is the appointment of the directors to the Society. The procedure to be followed in appointing the directors is outlined in Part 5.7 of the Society's Bylaws, a copy of which is attached as Appendix I. The process outlined for appointing directors has not been strictly followed in the past, as it is very cumbersome, and all parties recognize that it needs to be changed. It is important that a new process be established that better meets the needs of both the Municipalities and the Society. The appointment process, as outlined in Section 12 of the Bylaws of the Society and s. 23 of the Society Act, can be amended by the passing of a Special Resolution. The following process must be followed to achieve this change 1. As members of the Society, the Councils of the District of Maple Ridge and City of Pitt Meadows must both pass a resolution (copy attached as Appendix II) providing their consent Page 1 of 3 1133 to the amendment of the Society's bylaws and authorizing a representative to sign a Special Resolution of the Society on the District's and the City's behalf. As the Mayors are individual members of the Society, they would not participate in that resolution process, nor would they be designated as signatories on behalf of their respective corporations. The Corporate Officer is recommended to be that person. 2. All four members of the Society must sign a Special Resolution of the Society to amend the Society's bylaws (copy attached as Appendix III). The designated signatories for the District and the City, as well as the two Mayors, sign a Special Resolution of the Society to amend the Society's bylaws. This resolution would then be submitted to the Society for filing. 3. The Society must file a copy of the Special Resolution (copy attached as Appendix IV) with the Registrar of Companies in order for the changes to the Society's bylaws to be effective. This resolution would be signed by the person designated by the directors to sign on behalf of the Society. The following changes to the Society's bylaws are proposed: It is proposed that existing sections 5.7 and 5.8 in the Bylaws be deleted and replaced with the following and that the subsequent sections be renumbered accordingly: "5.7 The directors of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society and their terms of office shall be as follows: (a) Ron Salome for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2011 ; (b) Michael Pierce for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2012; (c) Mark Miller for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2012; (d) Geoffrey Johnston for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2013; (e) Ann McAfee for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2013; (f) Murray Day for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2014; and (g) One further director to be appointed as per section 5.8 for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2014. At the conclusion of their term of office, the directors may be appointed by the members for one further three (3) year term to expire at the applicable annual general meeting. 5.8 After the directors appointed under section 5.7 have ceased to hold office, the directors of the society shall be determined as follows subject to sections 5.9 and 5.10(a): (a) A Pitt Meadows Airport Society Directors Nominating Committee is hereby established composed of the CAO's or their designates from Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge and the Pitt Meadows Airport Society President or designate. (b) The directors will identify the specific skill sets that they consider are of benefit in directors, and this will be forwarded to the Nominating Committee. (c) The Nominating Committee will post an ad for directors in a local news paper, at a minimum, and the cost of the ad will be split equally between the Society and both the Municipalities of Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows. (d) The Nominating Committee will review the applications submitted from prospective directors and make a recommendation to the members on the appointment of directors to the Pitt Meadows Airport Society. Page 2 of 3 5.9 Directors appointed under section 5.8 shall sit for a three (3) year term commencing on the date of the applicable annual general meeting and may be appointed by the members for one further three (3) year term. 5.10 If an office of a director is vacated, the vacated position may be filled for the balance of the term by: a. the directors appointing a person to fill the vacancy if the balance of the term for that director is less than 6 months and section 7.8 does not apply; or b. the members appointing a person to fill the vacancy following the process stipulated in section 5.8 if the balance of the term for that director is 6 months or more." It is anticipated that this will simplify the appointment of directors from that currently outlined in the Bylaws of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society. It should be noted that under the BC Society Act, the Society is required to hold an Annual General Meeting. Notice of the meeting and the agenda is to be sent to the four members by the Society. The agenda should include presentation of the financial statement, the report of the auditor, if any, the report of the directors to the members and any other business the directors wish to place on the agenda. The last agenda item would be a resolution to appoint new directors. The Councils of the two communities would each pass a resolution after receipt of the agenda delegating voting authority at the Annual General Meeting to a selected representative and providing, as required, direction on voting. This individual would not be the Mayor as the Mayor is an individual member of the Society. The Society is responsible for filing the annual report with the Registrar of Companies and updating the list of directors. This proposed process for the appointment of directors has been discussed with Mr. Michael Pierce, the President of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society and he is in agreement with the process as outlined in this report. It is recommended that the respective Councils approve the process outlined in this report. J.L. (Ji Chief/Administrative Officer ct of Maple Ridge Rule r - Jake RUdolph Chief, Adrfhinistrative Officer City of Pitt Meadows JLR: cm Attachments Appendix I Pitt Meadows Airport Society Constitution and Bylaws Appendix II Council Resolution Appendix III Consent Resolutions of the Members of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society Appendix IV Society Act, Copy of Resolution \\mr.corp\docs\Clerks\01-Admin\0230-Associations\20-Groups\PM Airport Society\2011-02_Directors_Process_Report.doc Page 3 of 3 APPENDIX I Constitution The name of the Society is PITT MEADOWS AIRPORT SOCIEVY, The purposes of the Society are: To develops mainVA and operate the Pitt Meadows Airpork including dHties for passenger, for flight instruction, and for ak craft accommodation, gging, maintenance and overhaul. -4 provide an efficientandwell-maintaineda4ort facilityand dseMcefor the residents of and visitors to the Districts of Pitt Meadows md MaPle Ridge :t.-,fsurrounding areas - c TO acquiret hold, leow, manage, rent or sell any real propel or personal propeM for the fu therancc of the So e*s purposes. . 3 apply forand hold any licanpermtor operating authority S R "f@:.k. i`.., r4airedtocarry -'` which will ►' , the Sufi a ,ik= To enter into contracts with any person, body corpomte, govenunznt or government nlinistty, department or authority wbich may fuTther the purposes of the Society. f) "i o promote aviation and aeronautics. (g) TO promote or Oppose lg&lation or iegwative change affecting aviation aeronaut, -the aircraft indusuy and all its branches. (h) To solicit, receive, acquire and .bold donations, git and legacies for the purposes of the Society and to collect and receive rents, Profits and other revenues, grants, appropriadom and subsidies for the PurPoses Of the Society and to enjoy aU of the benefits of ownership thereof. �� Juan 17, tW To sect cat convertarzy pR oiler znt:0 Mond fro' e t �€ � `C �U � rew +pest any princip in sUch mmuer as may from time �� time-F�� determined and is disb�c str!b�tate such �.oncy and proper 'n the furtherance of the purposes of the Society. 13) To market. -promote, co.ordinattee anti manage a states and fa Hries descri-bed U. the SoCiety`s purposes. ("Ix To seed, fandiul and fittandRI Usifitimce from the Gavvr nekat of Canada, prcr,i of British Columbia, federal and prowl crown corporations and agencies, amun cips3 SovermeuM rgional distils and other local autthoritf cs sn. f—therance of the purpmes of the Society. l To manage and co-ordivat.a the deveiapmCnt of short, medium and long term place -W &VOlop and improve the land it the District of Pitt Mea c ws a� a public .airport, To acdvely promote the Pitt Meadows AiTort to Frill" d �o per a.kc'aft operators, To do all other WOO xis ate inci'denmlor conduc've to the a .ent of the purposes of the Society. e Society shall be caged on Vitiaout purposes of gain for its members or direck and =y profits or other a ret ion to the Society sh 0. be used in bera-Ace of it-4 poses. No member of the SOdOtty or dire or sha€t be paid AAY re uners .-on f�E services rendered to the Society but may be paid reasonable expCnSes is acftg asF member r of director: This a cruse is unalterable. 05 Upon `ding up or dissoludon of TbrSocietyr the assetsremauling after a payntent of all costs, .'barges -and eVenses properly xnctxxr*d in the wind up, ivauding the remuueratiOn of a liquidator, and meter psymeut to ernployees of the sodasodew of any arrears of.saiarie r, or waWas, and after the papmeut of any anther debts of the Society, shy be dism1mted e4uaUy betwetu the Diarict of bugle Ridge OAd the District of Pitt 440w-g- This ease is tsalterlt ...� .tuac 17, tip Do :L Here set fortk in numbered clauses, the bylaws prodingfor the matters referred to in section 6(1) of the Socie.V Act and any other bylaws. Pan I - Interpremdon 1.1 in these bylaws, -tress the conIM OtheMse requires, (a) "Airpore, means the Pitt Meadows Aitponv (b) ,council" moaw a municipal council under the MuniciPal Act (Britisb "&-&ctars" meam the directors of the socletY fw' the time being- and "dikector" meam only one director; ember" means -q -who ao,%e-d an applicant for iticorparation of a sole j has t caa 7n, be a member: twd very other penon who becomes md r=sins a member in accordance with the bylaws; (e) 'registered addrcsV of a member meam that member's address as recorded in the register of members., (f) I'socieW' means the Pitt meads" Airport SOCIeV; and (g) osociety Act" means the Society Act (BAtish Columbia) - III The definiions in the SOdeV Act on the date tbase bylaws become e5active apply to these bylaws. 1_3 Words importing the singular include the plural and vice versa and words importing a male person include a female person and a corporadom I--, Idne 13, 19" 39-253 64aw/_ 4 1,45- Unless Qr,.erwisp, gxprass�y pg-Oj�dcd, reference b3 these bVIaws KC, a statute is a refe-re=ce to that Statuff; as from time . . . t1p, time , M for&-, re-enacted Qr- rc-placed. Part 2 - Membership 2-1 Tbe3zembers of the society are the appjimnU for incorporation of the sucdely and tbose person Abe subsequently have be Corao Memberju accord cr artd, in either case, bane not ceased to be members.an . with thesa bylaws 2-2 Sxmpt for tho appjiC=tS for jacor 504OW shall be limited to.. POrLdon of The society, membersWp 1D be. (a) the District Of Pitt meadows; (b) the District of Maple Ridge: (C) the Person elected as MWOr Of the District of Pitt Meadows fro to thme; and M tim, a (d) the Person eiec'ted as Mayor of the r)lstrict of Maple mXid=ge L ,Qtr to tieAle 232 rlot, at, arty time, have More than fbiw (4) racwbars, 2-"' F-vu'Y Mr-mbfl- SW uphold the, constitution and mmr�v mft these 2,5 There shaLl bs no a=Uaj mCWbt,.r5hip due$_ Z6 A member Sh4 cease to be a member of tkid ggdcly bj deliym* its rejignation in *yitiq to the secretaTy0tre-asurer of the soc'etv or by lba'Hng or dclivcriuff it to dag address of -the society; or (b) On his death or iu the c2st Of a curPamdap an dissoludam 2-7 AR members are in good stanftg except tho.-ge, whcp have used to be . a member as provided in bylaw 2-6 and every member shall be entitled to vote at an racetings of the society. June 12, IW7 f V, `S7D >S gi aJ j.✓>! Pelt 3 - Meetings. Of, Members 3.1 Generals rneefings of the soci6v shall be held at the dm and place, in accordance with the Society der, that the directors dec ildc, 3.2 F-Vexy general Meeting, other than an annual general weetin& iE an extraordinary general tttectingd 3.3 The directorsmay, �x�hen they think jit, convene an extraordinuy Semi �eettzag, Notice of a general meeting shall We* the place, day and hour of meeting, and, in case of special business, the general . tie of that business. e a sdentaj omission to give notice of a meeting v or t�� non -receipt of a Dotict bY, any of the mwnbers entitled to receive notice' does not invalidate proceedings at that meefluga 3. 'i ae first a=ual general meeting of the soc'ety shall be bc7 d not more than 15 months after the date of incorporatiOU and Ater that an a=ual general meeting shzU be held at least otxce in every calendar year and not more than 15 montbs after the holding Of the last precetrig almtial general Meeting. EMI dart 4 - Proceedings at .Generai Meetings Special business i (a) all business at as extraotdiuuY general meeting except .e adoptioyl of rules of order and election of a chairperson pursuant to bylaw 4.5, mad b) aU business transacted at an. =uai general ineet except W OV) the adoption of rules of order; the conside .ration of the fmaucial. statements;. the report of the d5xecamrs; June a, IN? 97lvz m� ' a-m—F ab" if Y; the appointment of d re arsg the appointment of the auditor, if required; andl (vaw,) the other businew thzl, under Wiese bylaws, ought to. be t xsaeted at an a=ual geaeW meets or businew wbieh is brought under consideration by the report of the directors issued with the notice convening the meeting. 42 (a) No husiuesst Esther than the election of a ehairper§on and the adjeutment or teminadon of the Inert sball he conducted at a. general meeting at a tines when a qumum is not present- Cb) If at any u= durlug a general xnaa ag tbere ceases to be a quorum present business then is progress sb&U be suspended uuliI tbere is a quote prosettt or ualU .the matting is adjourned or termite& 4 wig 3o minutes from the time appointed for a general meeting a. quonm is not preseaj, the mettLugx if convened an the requisition of mambers, shall be terminated. La agy otber ease, it_ shall smud ad*mcd to the same day in the neat we*at the saw time. and place, and if, at the adjowned meeting, a quorura is not present_witbin 30 minutes irate the wL-Dc appointed fir 1 e meeting, the members present constitute a quoram 4.4, subject to bylaw 4.5, tho presidea; the vice president orin the absence of .. of the otherdimctors present, ShRU preside as chairpersonof a gcaarak meed4g. 4 if at a general Mcr-tiug them is no pregdentx vice prudent or other dais present wI utr;s after the t o appointed for bolding the meeting; or Cb) the president and all the other directors pxeseut are- M.willing to act a,,; ehaie�o� ,. .,.....`'t s "_ i -Y fir' '# _' :fi, rf �s•. +1` W753 /ft -�Z - '7 C6 A general mecftg My be ZdjDU_-UCd frDM ti= W d= and ffOM place. W place, but no business shall be transacted at an idjo=ed meeting other Than the business left unfimished'at the meciing frara which the adjoarnment took place_ 4,7 When a laotting is adjourned for 10 days of more, notice of the a4iournwil raeedng sball be given as in the case of thr, ori&al meeting. 4.9 Fucept as provided in this bylaw, h is not necessaxy to give notice Of an adjournment or of the business to be transacted at an adjourned general meetb%. 4.9 No resolution proposed at a meetog need be seconded and the chairperson of a meeting may move or propose a resolutiorL 4.10 In cast of an equality of votes the chairperson shall not have a casting or second vote in addition to the vote, if any, to wbicb he may be entitled as a member and the proposed resolution shall not pass. 4.11 Acorporaze member may vote by its authorlwdrepresentative, who sh'-LAI bt an iudividual duly appointed by that member, who is entitled to speak and vote, and in all other respects exercise fhe rights -of a mcmbar, and that represautative shall be reckoned as a member foy all purposes with respect to a meating of the Saciet!Y 4_22 A Me-MbCr in 900d StAnid%ng preSen?. at a Meeting orb =embers is culitled W one rote. 471S. voting is by show of hands or by ballot, as &ccted by the chainierson vifthe Meeting. 4A4 Voting by PrOXY is not PermittO-d- 4.15 The members may, by resolution, adopt Mies bf order but if no Such rules Of order are adopted, the Pro0br-diuP Of the members shall be governed by Ro'berfs Rules of order Newly Revised or, if the procedure adopted by resolutiorL does not ccvcr aUY Point of order, such point of order shall be da%=dued, according to Raberfs Rules of Order Newly Revised. Janz 12, M7 3S.253 N .1 The directors may exerelse all the powers and do all the: acts and rhipp than the socieW may exercise and do, and which are not by these bylaws or hY state ar othcrwie JawWy dareacd or required to be exercised or dune by the society in genera. meeting, including the full nmatgement attd control of the mats, liabilities, revenues and expenffitures of the AirporT and the ability to make rules and regulations governing, t € peaations, but subjext, nevertheless, to (b) these bylawr, and rules, not bring ineazdstent with these bylaws. which are made from time to time by the society in genwal macting, 52 ;°rulemades'.the societyn gerteralmatinginvalidatesc .. ciirectors that would have baw valid if Tkat m3c bad Dot beeD Made 5n'F,; Trhe. number of diractm shall be seven (7), subject to bylaw 5.4r 5a4 nae first diractors of f5c softy 'Chan be: (el the person holding the office of the MaYo,- Of thr- Pistnct Of F; Wadom from time to timc; from "dMe to time; of the person holding the offi= of the Adwk&tratcr of the Distrim Pitt Meadows from LLmr. to time; (d) tht person holding the, office of the Qdef Aftinistrative Officer of the District of Maplo Ridgefrom 1' time . w time;, and (e) Councillor Jobn Appleton, provided fbas shoWd he =fie to hold office as a. couuMor of the District of Pin Meadows, he shag also cease to be a director of the society under this section. If at any time an office of a directot is vacated, the =mber of directors'of T-be sarciety shag he reduced to the amber of directors actually holding that office until the vacant position is filled. 5_5 The fIrst directors appointed under bylaw 5.4 sham sit for one (1) Ye sha .retire at the next ahnual SenCral. meeting- 5ab A director appointed Lander bylaw .5,4 may be removed before the expiration of his term of of%ice by a special resolution of the members. 5. , After the first directors have ceased to hold Office. thu directors of the society shall be detern iued as fallowso (1) each of the CoundIs of the fiisuicts of Fitt Meadows and Maple Ridge shalt nowiinate up to seven (7) individu9s; from the individuab nonduated pursuant to bylaw 5.7(a), bath the trict of Maple Ridge and the District of Fitt Mcadows shalll agree on a finil Hst of uoxWnew o,c) tue naves of the nominees wiB be drams and tL.e t seven (7) names drawn wiU be rbe directors of the socieYn Sep Tkc to m. of office of the grit directors determined under bylaw 5.7 shad be as follow, : a� the first tbxee names drwAm shan sit for tbree (3) y w (b) the next M (2) names drawn sb&U sit for two years; and (c) the fwal two (2) names drawn shall ,sit for one (1) year, d $nherea%er, all directors shaU sit for three (3) yea .s.9 No act or, proceeding of the decors is iuvalid oDly * reasou of there being less than the prescribed number of directors in. O fice. 5.10 A digeetor is not required to be a member. .11 in accordance witb Ardclr. 3 of the i~onstitatioN no director shad be remunerated for Brits err .a as a director, but a director shall be re►im►biu�ed for all eapcnses accessarily and reasonably incurred by hira wbile engaged in the affairs Of the sbe"tety_ w a� dud+ I?, IW7 n6 - Frar-cedinp Of MMUOM e d-ectors may matt toFthcr el the pla,Ccs they thirds fit to dispatc sin s - ado h and other &e reg ale th air Mectinp and proceedings y see fit 6.2 A meeting of the diroctors may be held by telephone. or oLher cozm uni tions tilities teat pert all panidPants in the meeting to hear each other, and a director who pa�`tickpate , in the Ming by those means shall. be taunted as gresesxt at the IncOz xig. 6.3 TkIc quorum for a meeting of the directors shad be five (5) directors. 6.4 The president shall be cbairpenon of ah MsctinP of the directors, but if at ea nng the president me is of present within Sit minutes after the time app�oWted for holding tine MeaftS the price president shall act as ebairpemon. If neither the president nor the Vice president is present the directors -present may choose one of their number to he chairperson at that meeting- 6-5 .y two (7) directors may aF any time convene a meeting of the directors. 6.6 The directors may delegate any, but not alL of their powers tc co tte cq cansisttg of the director or directors as they ihivk fit. V A camMittec so formed iu the eXercisc of the powers so delegated she` conform to any des imposed on it by the direc;o , end shall report every act or think done- 4n eaer�e of moose po to e t est. meeting .:A the d�eetoz s to b� held new after has been done. 6.9 A committee shall elect a chaftperSou of its mcefwgs, but if no cbaitperso , is eler-te or if at a mceTiug the chairperson is not present vim 30 minutes der the titter appointed for holding the meotiM the directors presentwbo are members of the cO ttec shad choose one of their number to be amirpenon of the edug. The members of a. committcc way meet and adjourn as theY Oduk proper- 6010 For a. fist meeting of directors held immediately follOw'ng the. appoitntmer'z. of a director or d€reccon at •ail: MMUal or OTher ganerdl. meeting of members, it is nog: necessary to give notice of *e Mac tug to the newly appointed director or directors for the mea ug go be cowtitutedf if a quo;= of the directors � prestnt; 6_l.l � du-ector who smay be absent temporarily from British Columbia may send or deliver to the address of the society a waiver, of notice, which may be by le>:ccr, tale 1t68C� srn iT"�'r telex or cable, of any Meetffx of the directors ard may at any time mithdraw the alvef" and unto the waiver is withdrawn �enoti= ofMee tg or directors shaU be sent to that director; and any and all Ideadngs of the &t:ctors of be society, notice of which has is not been given to that director shalL if a quorum of the director.s present, be vaUd and effective. 6.12 Questious artsft at a .Meeting of the d'rectors andcommittee of directors slam. be decided by a tnaj &Y of votes- 6A3 In case, .: an equaHty of votes 6_l c� resolution proposed at a meeting of directors or cOmmittee cif directors need be seconded and the chairpetson of a meeting may move or propose a resolution. resolution in r tiug, signed by all. the &recors and placed with the uteS, f the d e615 is as valid and effective as if regularly passed at a. meet'ng of directors. _i 6.16 in observance of dactse 3 of ibe sodeWs Constitution, no director shaU accept a y rWqqAeeatjon for services rendered to the: society. Without affecting the SpryAct, no director 0y as ployee of tlse soeidty shad have any direct or indirect f nwelal interest any parchase order or contract onitred into or assurd on behalf' of the society mess such member or amployee absents himself from all meetings where the order or contract is approved or d cussed while #ha latter is being discussed or any vote is to k6A in am Mauer Iffectiug such an interest in are older or contract. The ptovis rns of s bylaw shall t apply to the xei�tnbursemeat of a direotar €n ra�spect of expenses wed with the board's approval in carry out the business of the sOcietya 6.17 The directors may, by resolution, adopt Mies of order but if an such rules of order we adopted, the proceedings of the directors shad be governed by Roberts Rules of Order or, if the procedure adopted by resolution does not covet any pint of order, such poLnt of order shall be determiutd according to Roberts Mules of Order. Part 7 - Duties of 00ters . �e society shall 'have three (3) officers, who shall be the presidents vice president and secsetaty treasurer 7.2 'ire directors sban elect from among their number a president, a ces -,greasuIrer4 each of wham shall bold office for one Year8nd shall president earl seeretaxy 319-353 4-""/— suno 17 t9" 12 �rffic c genera Meeting, wbe meLr successors sha. be elect -d, revoe7,p� � Abe Est president shah be John pple%M . 7, 'fie president sha.0 presidc at mteti[39sof the society and of the diroctor = A Ihe president i, the chief executive offs' of the society and Shan supervise the other officers in the e=cotion of their duties. .q Tho vice president shall carry out the draties of the president during the absence of the presideat} 7.6 The secretary tre rer SIMU (1) conduct the correspondence of the society; issnp nodces of meetings of the socilety and directors; keep mireates of aU meetings of the society and erectors; (dj have tody of as records and docameab of ft socie kept those required to be kept by the treasurer- (e-) have custody of the COMMOU SCRI Of thf- society; ntaiu the, re&er of He ber$; keep the rwancial records, induding books of 4ccor L nee s t comply with the Soety Ad I. and ruder financial statements to the directors, inembers and otbe Cher- reized. 7r in the absence of the secretary U'CUWear !rarat a rneeUngz *0 directors shad appoint another person W act as secret €troa. Wer at the M9vtW9- 7.9 The mfambers may by special resolution te'Mwe a director as the president or the vice president before the expirati-n Of his term of office" and may eica a. successor to Cox fete the term Of office, 7.9 Neither the presid=' the vice president znDr the s � d for all a es be remunerated fair being or acting as an offer, but shall. be re necessarily and resso ably ;ucutzed by bim fettle engaged in the affaixs of the socety. 3S- C7'IZ 01D II LSD= 163 iC.b• YF:f,+wPi9d;• �.� --y. -- _. Part 9, . 5cal &I 'Me: directars may provide a tpu=on s .l for the socierY =d nay destroy � seal &nd substitute a new seal is its glace:. 8-2 The common seal shall be affixed only when authorized by a. resolution of the directors and then only in the preseucea of the persoats premcribed in the resolution, or if no persons am prescribed, in the presence of the president and secretary+' t reaswe$ or president and vice president. &.3 All instruments, agreements, contracts or ether documents which ar'e not executed by of Wng the common seeal of the society may be executed. by fucb persons as niky be prescribed from time to ame by resolution of the directors; the president =d the secretly-treasut'ert (e) the vice president and the secretary -treasurer; or d; the president and the vice president. Part 9 . Borrawhig ay ....,.. :# "E; l"; #'-..'�_4 J the .1 :'hdirectors=ta :. i. >'.-i of thesociety, borroworraisr. andsecure the payinenror .i• a a1k -..J, , _. t)f and in the name =DrLev in the Ma=er theydecide.and, particular the. issue of debentures- 9.2 No debenture shjU be issued witbout &at bbudning the consent of the members by S-PeCi8l rescrlutim 93 The members pasty by special resolution restlict the borrowing powers Of the directors; but a .restriction imposed expires at The next amusl general meeting. Part 10 - Auditor 10.1 -ne society shall engage an auditor.. quA f' xed to act undcr both the Sodery,Act amd the, Munbp& Act who shall be a person who is a member, or partnersbip whose pal inm are members in good standing of the: Canadian Instituto of Chartered Accountauts or the Cartifted General Accountants, Association of British Colombia, or a person. certified by the Auditor Certification Berard established under of the Companzy ,Act (British I�o' hxmbia'L 102 The first auditor abarl be appoVowd by the direaari be sh&U a6a fill al -I vacancie-s. ocvu-ng in Tbe, offf cc Of OLudft0r. i,rj,3 Az auditor may be removed and L now auditor appointed by special rcsoluti= WA An auditor sball be promptly inforwedim w0ting of apPointment or rc=oval. 0.5 No director and no employee of the society ft-H be auditor. 10.6 ne auditor may attend gene W meatW85. 10-7 �M* fiscal year end of the society shall be De=mber 31 in each ya&L Fort 11 - Natices to Members 11-1 A notmaybe given to a member or &ectar, either personally or by pre- paid =4 to biju at bis reffistemd address. 11.2 A notice sew. by mail sh&U be deemed to have been given on the third day t notice h" been I it is jOU0w1ug th&t Orj wbich the notice is post4 and in proving tha FVCU sufficient to prove the notice was properiv, addressed. and put in a Canadian post vffim 11_3 Nati" of a general mae,6ml sbWI bc given to fa) eves: member shown on the register of memberS On the daY n0tica is gLvex and (b) the auditOr. II A No otber person is entitled to receive a notice of general meeting. Pon. 12 - Bylaw's 12.1 on being, admitted tomembersh'peach member is enTitled to aud the societY � shall provide, without cbarge� a copy of the constitmion and bylaws of the. society. ill 1 .1 1-" 3 11 011 0 11 " I E; OG-A i 2Y e. F -IW f . 7 -- - - -. -- - 112" Tbese bylaws shall not be altered or added to except by -,;�g�j r- .pac I -S'Olutiop- Dated Wimass(es) [signature] m,mv At 1 01 . ... .. --- A .1 L jurle 1,, IW1 . ML253 I I "I M�mt (Signature, Mdnt Aftr=] PSb ial TSa Dtooldent Address, - WAIS . -C-Vej uali-e - -.im F-podl, U-JO W. § Avr- ifuMve. (Resident Addreal VVft-ae5-v(eE) ' Ca IN a ell [Full Namef--- A, [it t Adams] VAY7. S j f [Signature) [NOTE - AT LEAS T 5 APPLIC&M MVST SIGN, I 3mma 1;4 %W7 3D,-= Applicauts; for incorporal [Signature] Landra Zel #223-73n SitlisbtirV Ave. P&r_nabv- R. VSZ-4B7- [R*S1dOxM Addres-s-1 "3-97,1- APPENDIX II DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE COUNCIL RESOLUTION The Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, hereby resolves as follows: 1. That the District consents to the bylaws of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society being amended by deleting sections 5.7 and 5.8 and replaced with the following and that the subsequent sections be renumbered accordingly: "5.7 The directors of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society and their terms of office shall be as follows: (a) Ron Salome for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2011 ; (b) Michael Pierce for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2012; (c) Mark Miller for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2012; (d) Geoffrey Johnston for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2013; (e) Ann McAfee for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2013; (f) Murray Day for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2014; and (g) One further director to be appointed as per section 5.8 for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2014. At the conclusion of their term of office, the directors may be appointed by the members for one further three (3) year term to expire at the applicable annual general meeting. 5.8 After the directors appointed under section 5.7 have ceased to hold office, the directors of the society shall be determined as follows subject to sections 5.9 and 5.10(a): (a) A Pitt Meadows Airport Society Directors Nominating Committee is hereby established composed of the CAO's or their designates from Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge and the Pitt Meadows Airport Society President or designate. (b) The directors will identify the specific skill sets that they consider are of benefit in directors, and this will be forwarded to the Nominating Committee. (c) The Nominating Committee will post an ad for directors in a local news paper, at a minimum, and the cost of the ad will be split equally between the Society and both the Municipalities of Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows. (d) The Nominating Committee will review the applications submitted from prospective directors and make a recommendation to the members on the appointment of directors to the Pitt Meadows Airport Society. 5.9 Directors appointed under section 5.8 shall sit for a three (3) year term commencing on the date of the applicable annual general meeting and may be appointed by the members for one further three (3) year term. 1) 5.10 If an office of a director is vacated, the vacated position may be filled for the balance of the term by: (a) the directors appointing a person to fill the vacancy if the balance of the term for that director is less than 6 months and section 7.8 does not apply; or (b) the members appointing a person to fill the vacancy following the process stipulated in section 5.8 if the balance of the term for that director is 6 months or more." 2. That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute, on behalf of the District, all such resolutions and documents of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society that may be necessary to give effect to the above resolution. \\mr.corp\docs\Clerks\01-Admin\0230-Associations\20-Groups\PM Airport Society\2011-02_directors_report_app_Il.doc APPENDIX III CONSENT RESOLUTIONS OF THE MEMBERS OF PITT MEADOWS AIRPORT SOCIETY The undersigned, being the members of PITT MEADOWS AIRPORT SOCIETY (the "Society"), HEREBY CONSENT in writing to the following resolutions to have the same force and effect as if passed at a general meeting of the Society: WHEREAS: A. The Society wishes to amend its bylaws in respect of the appointment and term of directors; BE IT RESOLVED AS A SPECIAL RESOLUTION THAT: 1. the bylaws of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society be amended by deleting sections 5.7 and 5.8 and replaced with the following "5.7 The directors of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society and their terms of office shall be as follows: (a) Ron Salome for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2011 ; (b) Michael Pierce for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2012; (c) Mark Miller for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2012; (d) Geoffrey Johnston for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2013; (e) Ann McAfee for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2013; (f) Murray Day for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2014; and (g) One further director to be appointed as per section 5.8 for a term to expire at the annual general meeting in 2014. At the conclusion of their term of office, the directors may be appointed by the members for one further three (3) year term to expire at the applicable annual general meeting. 5.8 After the directors appointed under section 5.7 have ceased to hold office, the directors of the society shall be determined as follows subject to sections 5.9 and 5.10(a): (a) A Pitt Meadows Airport Society Directors Nominating Committee is hereby established composed of the CAO's or their designates from Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge and the Pitt Meadows Airport Society President or designate. (b) The directors will identify the specific skill sets that they consider are of benefit in directors, and this will be forwarded to the Nominating Committee. (c) The Nominating Committee will post an ad for directors in a local news paper, at a minimum, and the cost of the ad will be split equally between the Society and both the Municipalities of Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows. (d) The Nominating Committee will review the applications submitted from prospective directors and make a recommendation to the members on the appointment of directors to the Pitt Meadows Airport Society. 5.9 Directors appointed under section 5.8 shall sit for a three (3) year term commencing on the date of the applicable annual general meeting and may be appointed by the members for one further three (3) year term. 5.10 If an office of a director is vacated, the vacated position may be filled for the balance of the term by: (a) the directors appointing a person to fill the vacancy if the balance of the term for that director is less than 6 months and section 7.8 does not apply; or (b) the members appointing a person to fill the vacancy following the process stipulated in section 5.8 if the balance of the term for that director is 6 months or more." and that the subsequent sections be renumbered accordingly 2. these resolutions shall may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Executed copies of these resolutions may be delivered by facsimile transmission and it shall not be necessary to confirm execution by delivery of the originally executed documents. DATED this day of 2011. MAYOR, DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAYOR, CITY OF PITT MEADOWS DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE by its authorized signatory: CITY OF PITT MEADOWS by its authorized signatory: APPENDIX IV AZBRITISH COLUNIBIA The Best Place on Earth The following is a copy of 1 a special resolution' passed an ordinary resolution j a directors' resolution Form 10 (Section 66 and 67) 91111914Aa_tM in accordance with the by-laws of the Society on the "RESOLVED Dated this day of (Day) (Month) day of (Name of Society) Certificate of Incorporation No. (Month) A 0 (Year) by (Signature) (Relationship to Society) Strike out words which do not apply. [Note — (a) No special resolution has effect until accepted by the Registrar of Companies. (b) Send, in duplicate, to the Registrar of Companies. Mailing Address: PO Box 9431 Stn Prov Govt, Victoria BC V8W 9V3. Location Address: 2nd Floor — 940 Blanshard Street, Victoria BC together with applicable fee. Telephone number: 250 356-8609.] Filing Fee: Special resolution, except a special resolution for borrowing, $50. Special resolution for borrowing $40. Ordinary resolution $40. Directors' resolution $40. Additional information and forms are available on the Internet at: www.fin.gov.bc.ca/registries Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIPPA): Personal information provided on this form is collected, used and disclosed under the authority of the FO/PPA and the Society Actfor the purposes of assessment. Questions regarding the collection, use and disclosure of personal information can be directed to the Executive Coordinator of the BC Registry Services at 250 356-1198, PO Box 9431 Stn Prov Govt, Victoria BC V8W 9V3. FIN 782/WEB Rev. 2008 / 8 / 27