The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2011-07-26 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDistrict of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA July 26, 2011 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber MEETING DECORUM Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be reprimanded. Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 MOMENT OF REFLECTION 300 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS 400 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 500 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 501 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of July 12, 2011 502 Minutes of the Public Hearing of July 19, 2011 503 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of July 4 (2), 14(3), 15, 19 and 20(5), 2011 Page 1 Council Meeting Agenda July 26, 2011 Council Chamber Page 2 of 9 600 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 601 State of the District Address - Mayor Daykin Note: Item 602 was forwarded from the July 18, 2011 Council Workshop Meeting 602 Property Taxation and Tax Multiples Presentation - P. Gill, General Manager of Corporate and Financial Services 700 DELEGATIONS 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 801 Award of Contract, ITT-PI11-42, 224 Street Loading and Unloading Area, on District Owned Land Adjacent to Spirit Square Staff report dated July 26, 2011 recommending that Contract No. ITT-PL11- 42 for construction of a 224 Street Loading and Unloading Area be awarded to Canadian Lawn Care Services Ltd. and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 802 Building, Electrical, Gas and Fire Safety Inspection Reports for 11701, 11709, 11715 and 11723 Fraser Street Staff report dated July 26, 2011 recommending Council consideration of options for remedial action or commencement of injunction proceedings in BC Supreme Court to enforce bylaws against Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc. for property at 11701, 11709, 11715 and 11723 Fraser Street. 900 CORRESPONDENCE 1000 BYLAWS Note: Item 1001 is from the Public Hearing of July 19, 2011 Bylaws for Third Readin 1001 RZ/075/10, 10455, 10469 & 10481245B Street Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6762-2010 To rezone from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to allow for subdivision into 11 single family lots Council Meeting Agenda July 26, 2011 Council Chamber Page 3 of 9 Bylaws for Second and Third Reading 1002 Maple Ridge Downtown Business Improvement Area Establishment Bylaw Staff report dated July 26, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Downtown Business Improvement Area Establishment Bylaw No. 6824- 2011 be given second and third readings. Bylaws for Final Reading 1003 2011-035-CP/2011-035-RZ, 23711 & 23735 132 Avenue Staff report dated July 26, 2011 recommending final reading 1003.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6813-2011 To remove Neighbourhood Park designation from one area and apply that designation to another area Final reading 1003.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6818-2011 To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) &RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to P-1(Park and School) to provide a municipal park for the residents of the area Final reading 1004 RZ/078/09, 22525, 22515, 22505 & 22491 Brown Avenue Staff report dated July 26, 2011 recommending final reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6707-2009 To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment) to permit the construction of a four -storey, wood -frame, 77 unit residential apartment building Final reading 1005 RZ/093/06, 23000, 23024 and 23050 136 Avenue Staff report dated July 26, 2011 recommending final reading 1005.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6580-2008 To designate Eco Cluster, Conservation and Low Density Urban areas and amend the conservation and trail area Final reading Council Meeting Agenda July 26, 2011 Council Chamber Page 4 of 9 1005.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6581-2008 To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1 (Residential District), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) and RST (Street Townhouse Residential) to permit the subdivision into 88 lots. Final reading COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE 1100 Minutes - July 18, 2011 The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting. Public Works and Development Services 1101 2011-025-RZ, 24315, 24331, 24369 and 24387 110 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-1 Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6807-2011 to permit future subdivision into approximately 36 single family residential be deferred until further information for the area is available. 1102 2011-059-RZ, 23709 111A Avenue, RS-3 to RM-1 Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6840-2011 to permit construction of a three building townhouse development containing approximately twelve units be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in Schedules A, C, D, E, F, and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. Council Meeting Agenda July 26, 2011 Council Chamber Page 5 of 9 1103 2011-065-RZ, 24426 102 Avenue, RS-3 to R-3 Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6844-2011 to permit future subdivision be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in Schedules A, B, D and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879- 1999. 1104 2011-066-RZ, 26777 Dewdney Trunk Road, RS-3 to RS-2 Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6841-2011 to permit future subdivision into two lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in Schedules A, B, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1105 2011-068-RZ, 25339 130 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-2 Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6842-2011 to permit future subdivision into single family lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in Schedules B and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1106 2011-069-RZ, 20660 Maple Crescent, RS-1 and C-3 to RS-1 Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6845-2011 to permit future subdivision into two lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described in Schedule A, B and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1107 2011-067-RZ, 21755 Lougheed Highway, CS-1 to C-2 Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6847-2011 to permit an expansion of uses in an existing building be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Council Meeting Agenda July 26, 2011 Council Chamber Page 6 of 9 1108 RZ/074/10, 11716 Burnett Street, RS-1 to R-1 Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6785-2010 to allow future subdivision into three single family lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1109 RZ/116/10, 12393 203 Street, IRS-1 to RS-1b Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6793-2011 to permit subdivision into three single family lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1110 RZ/119/10, 22388 124 Avenue and 12385 224 Street, RS-1 to RM-1 Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6787-2010 to permit future construction of ten townhouse units be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1111 RZ/083/09, 12771 McNutt Road, First Extension Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that a one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/083/09 to permit subdivision into three lots under the RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone. 1112 2011-052-DP, 23000 and 23024 136 Avenue Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2011-052-DP for the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zoned lots. 1113 2011-052-DVP, 23000 and 23024 136 Avenue Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2011-052-DVP to vary road right of way widths and carriageway widths in the Eco-cluster development and to vary the maximum building height for R-3 and R-1 zoned buildings. 1114 2011-083-SP, 28487 108 Avenue Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that Application 2011-083- SP for a fill permit for property at 28487 108 Avenue not be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission. Council Meeting Agenda July 26, 2011 Council Chamber Page 7 of 9 1115 Award of Contract, RFP No. E02-010-162, Design and Engineering Services 232 Street Bridge over North Alouette River Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that the contract for design and engineering services for the 232 Street Bridge over North Alouette River be awarded to Delcan Corporation and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 1116 Award of Contract, 232 Street Drainage Improvements (124 Avenue to 128 Avenue) Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that the contract for the 232 Street Drainage Improvements from 124 Avenue to 128 Avenue be awarded to Double M Excavating Ltd and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 1117 Cruise for a Cause Day Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending the use of municipal streets be authorized for the Cruise for a Cause Day on Thursday, August 25, 2011. Financial and Corporate Services(including Fire and Police 1131 Disbursements for the Month Ended May 31, 2011 Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that disbursements for May, 2011 be approved. 1132 2012-2014 Council Indemnity Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending the adoption of Schedule "A" as the schedule of indemnities for Mayor and Councillors effective December 1 in each of 2011, 2012 and 2013. 1133 Banking Services Agreement Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign an agreement for banking services with the Toronto - Dominion Bank for a term of five years. Council Meeting Agenda July 26, 2011 Council Chamber Page 8 of 9 Community Development and Recreation Service 1151 Recreation and Facilities Fees and Charges Staff report dated July 18, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees Amending Bylaw No. 6826-2011 be given first, second and third reading. Correspondence 1171 Other Committee Issues 1181 1200 STAFF REPORTS 1201 Award of Contract, No. ITT-EN11-34, 216 Street and 128 Avenue Intersection Drainage Improvements Staff report dated July 26, 2011 recommending that Contract ITT-EN11-34 for 216 Street and 128 Avenue Intersection Drainage Improvements be awarded to Mission Contractors Ltd. and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 1202 Award of Contract, No. ITT-EN11-40, 227 Street Road Improvements (Haney Bypass to North of Holyrood Avenue) Staff report dated July 26, 2011 recommending that Contract No. ITT- EN11-40 for 227 Street Road Improvements (Haney Bypass to North of Holyrood Avenue) be awarded to Imperial Paving Limited and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. 1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL 1400 MAYOR'S REPORT 1500 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS Council Meeting Agenda July 26, 2011 Council Chamber Page 9 of 9 1600 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 1700 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING 1800 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC 1900 ADJOURNMENT QUESTION PERIOD The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes. Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the information required to provide a complete and accurate response. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings, delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@maoleridge.ca. Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca. Checkeq by ° �j Date: 7 f CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 4, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin; Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1, 2011-011-SD LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 1, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP46698 13887 Silver Valley Road Jaskar Developments Statutory Right -of -Way for Municipal Services THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO 2011-011-SD. CARRIED J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member All] N I Cl) Y U { Owl — •/ [0 2` 1 1 i 14 P 26132 15 13917 4' I � 13897 W 13926 I 13920 PARK U 1 j 13912 m i 2 BCP 46661 13906 BC 46657 13894 LO � BCP 46658 I 13900 3 5 13872 4 m CO 4em 46 13890 I 13895 � 4 C-- � 5 13880 d7 1 I413871 � f 2 49 138E3 13860 50 Bass t 3 LO C) 13856 51 13655 i 4 U U 52 13851 i I 13852 [0 Co 13848 PARK i BCP 46658 I PARK CI Io IC(-T oono�ory F�I Rem $5 54 53 N N BCP 33244 CP 41713 i I 13795 4 1 BCS 358 I L 3948 BCP 46698 j F r i 1 BCP 46658 13887 J Q 13868 22 2 13g62 5 13857 13g55 � 3 13842 6 21 1384 y l 2 13831 20 r �NQ 13822 7 13825 13828 4 19 13g05 13802 8 13811 ! 13812 1 10 >9a 13>se 11 13>92 9 18 y3j9s 2 9 17 � 13g02 ti 1373>s 12 CO � f3 13782 13 1378y ' 83 QO 2 O 3 �, 13>>2 11 16 13765 j 13>82 8 =� r3>>s 13 F. 13771 ❑7 13>>3 me L't 15 13>>2 4 13762 12 14 5 13763 7 8 01, �' / 13762 13>62 14 13752 13 y3> 6 15 SILVER VALLEY RD r �� CI f Pitt Mea aws.�lli i 13887 SILVER VALLEY ROAD CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF N District of MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE — , Langley i � PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Jul 4, 2011 FILE: 2011-011-SD BY: PC SCALE 1:2,000 �SEq R_ CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 4, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member I. 2011-011-SD Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary LEGAL: Lot 5, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP46661; and Lot 1, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP_ LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: 13880 232 Street Silver Valley Projects Ltd Subdivision Servicing Agreement Release of Covenant BB1293628 (Lot 1) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO 2011-011-SD. CARRIED J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member _ i20 R PARK 76 BCP 871 20 2f 22 1 2 e � 23 n 3 y SIDE CRF.5 23173 26 27 q 4 m N 1 N P 7757 ' � EP 11340 Rem 10 A 5enr, P 13776 8 P 2 09 13992 Rem 4 13976 5 wH 3960 13917 g4 P �B 19 13948 15 14 SUBJECT PROPERTY ,6 13926 13920 PARK 4 13912 1 m 17 2 BCP 46661 '3906 9i' 6657 13894 a w 3 BCP 46658 13872 13900 v 5 16 P 278 4 m� 1 � BCP 46658 ROAD 3880 PARK 1 BGP 46698 P 13776 2 13860 3 13856 3 4 a D- BCP 46658 13852 >g m Q 5 13887 1 zy13868 P 2 22 11 13882 5 138" j EP 3855 6 3 13842 6 21 1384, P Rem 1 13331 2013825 Rem N BCP 33244 13822 7 13828 4 13805 ry 19 1 13802 8 13811 :R1 2 10 11 13793 1.Sj96 13792 18 13795 9 2 9 /3802 17 13', 3 * 12 r. BCP 42823 I 10 )dre) o ¢ 137,e 3 4 8 3aT/ 2 11 16 r3765 � i 1 13 PARK m 1377 3 0 13T 1 5 4 3»2 3 1 BCS 3588 7 13762 12 1 13�s3 ,3 111 d: 6.0? 14 13752 13 - 6 13" 13j53 15 SILVER VALLEY RD g N N 3 Cp,Qf Pitt` 1r Mea Qws_' ! 13880 232 STREET 0 ! I'U) I 1 _ � �- o CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE N f District of i— Langley } I r PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:3,000 DATE: Jan 27, 2011 FILE: 2011 011 SD BY: PC _F ASEf3 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 14, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. HIMARK HOMES LTD. LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lots 13, 14, & 15, all of Section 3, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP33001 10110, 10120, & 10130 242 Street Himark Homes Ltd. Modification of Covenant BB588093 THAT THE MAYOR: AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO HIMARK HOMES LTD. f-, CARRIED A.,(Jim) Kule, Chief Administrative Officer Member .I. 8 3 4 5 6 7 2 29 30 31 U) 7 8 9 T W M M N N N C� d� V7 N I- � r �9526 � N N N It � � N dN �t N N N N N N N N N 101 AAVE. 0 CD CD � 0148 15 36 N O N N N N N 0142 16 LO 0 52 � N N N 28 27 26 0136 17 37 N N 11 10 _ 18 ,46 24 23 22 cc) 25 10131 0132 38 T 10140 0 12 0128 19cc g co 21 O 10133 � N 24 10125 39 10130 � 13 U- cY) a' 23 10121 o U 20 � 10123 U U m PA 40 a- � 10120 m 14 BCP 18� 241 19 m 10113 N 10110 15 18 42 18 10103 10100 �b PARK 10110 2 �08 10093 O��ir 10106 2- �43 17 16 �P�ARK BCP 18974 9610102 6 42 "t10099 10096 C 10097 �, co m 10092 C010095 N 10088 o PARK ,t L-10093 10084 41 0 � 00 N The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge LO T 00 dM 39 `37 40 makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy 6 N 37 N 38 N or present status of the information shown on L`v` 53 3/2 3 this map. CI f Fitt j Mea cy s _� DAC i� Ig `o CORPORATION OF L THE DISTRICT OF N MAPLE RIDGE District of I Langley LICENSES, PERMITS & BYLAWS DEPT. SCALE 1:1,000 ERASER p, DATE: Jun 30, 2011 FILE: Untitled BY: RO CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 14, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. DP/041/06 Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary LEGAL: Lot 1, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 10921; and Lots 11 & 12, both of Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 60927 LOCATION: 24221, 24281, 24361 104 Avenue OWNER: John & Diana Boyce REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Enhancement & Protection Agreement THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO DP/041/06. Erni air CARRIED I J.L.-(Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member PARK 138 A142 eyes >P� ,o,,tb 1G0 - BCP 8153 — - '+a 137 143 �� ! yt° 158 155 0 0 125 TO q35 ` 2 108 144 ,05131 159 1-�, P P` � 54 1p505 102 109 14 ,�p5 a1a 126 a $ 10111 r 146 tdA� PJ� NL 153 122T I0507 127 103 ti".p 147 152 °�o p .� 0 10509 T20� � 12$ 129 104 t `y�y 0 ,cF`° N 151 { 5 g1� 0 113 U, 148 150 31$ 119 ��' L,ca a 105 ° . tie 114 149 116 11 ~ V' 130 W ,106 n� 115 oafa oo 105 AVE 131 m RP►PGf- o . 107 13 �18 A 136 135 134 �133 132 B 5 PARK P 666E 4 P 1 21 P 60927 P 60927 P 31591 JSUBJECT PROPERTIES 14 15 1 11 12 10 I E 37 W n � � W Z w District of Pitt Meadows; c��ILYII. ■ i� r'�'��i�;11i�'J•Ily Langley SCALE 11 P 41519 38 7 104 AVE. � Kr193 U11�H}{y� N 4 N 4 [Ail N 1231! 135N 36 37 389 40 Rem N�4 5 41 96 BC 9 10 11 12 1 1 15 23 22 r037e 6 8 `� S1 � 21 , 7 7 "' 10 Man 8 E 133' B '4'� 103 A AVE. 1 9 m IIXH9 29 28 17 20 F- 1o3rz 10 V N 5 103LS 10352 10347 10350 IOUsVi 1$ 114 19 N 10332 U 00 f-- 4 1n 10318 31 19343 h' ap 26 1n 19 `c� 18 10326 12 d SIXi3D cr) 130333 N =4 32 Q '03" 25 20 a 17 031e 7-9 13 c] 10327 33 1 0331 10321 !,(L 24 N 21 16 10 1 1 34 I 10313 14 1 1W21 10321 10319 22 10305 1a 10303 103 AVE. 103 AVE. i 24221, 24281 & 24361 104 AVENUE �1 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Sl,anA01 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ti ,�•„� DATE: Apr 27, 2006 FILE: SD/041/06 BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 14, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. SD/042/10 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lots 55 & 56, both of Section 16, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 26073 23710 118 Avenue & 11756 236 Street Golden Ears Plaza Ltd. Subdivision Servicing Agreement THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SD/042/10. CARRIED I J.L. kJim) R"u le, Chief Administrative Officer Member 119 AVE. 119 AVE 1 Fh "A" N ALMS 2415 N I I PARK A LMS 1818 LMS 1421 1 I N SCALE 1:2,500 11757 �11888 11 O N m m 11 t0 tO `O t0 11899 11aso B �, 12 1 10 9N 8N 7 11887 fD LM 27 7 11870 d -13 C neat 10 N 1 2 � 3 a 214 11862 � i0 11873 11856 `z 15 9 'D 8 11865 669 !7 118 AAVE 29 11850 2,566� 16 28 11853 11840 ^O 6 96 ^ N 17 n 8" 5 ry q 11841 27 a n 826 N 16 a LMP 1272 11e29 26 24 23 22 21 a 1911817 81s 2$ ° O 11811 20 11606 11899 g 10 1 7 8 N 118�8 <q 11 a92 11897 N 8 2 118a86 11888 7 n n 3 N m 11882 N �5 PARK r ti 6 N 1ta7s � 4 o m� J 11870 4 2 17B6d —� 3 11859 2 11842 11820, REM. 22 1 P 1676 118 AVE 11774 ` SUBJECT PROPERTIES 26a7: 55 1r 756 W 1/2 21 P 1676 m t1798 � 1 ,^„ 2 ; 3 4 17 18 N BC 10 2 1795 B p 11793 16 6 5 11792 56 a �P ''�� 15 8 +� 14 PARK A 13 /36L7�2 12 PAR , 1p 11 BCP 10 92 BCP 6" 11744 2 11737 B 4 r7 7r�7,9 LMP 30235 my 6 1�88s 9, PARK G 7 4 v 1sr, W s; 8 w 11692 BCP 179 11667 U 3 116727 58 9 11659 33 11656 262 1-10 ` 11653 1166 11 A 11645 PARK ti 12 PARK BCP 3179 N 11637 13 LMP 14 11633 City Pitt r of Meadows. — io 11756 & 11774 236 STREET CO - x -fT - - -,— 'I o = r` CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF District of- Lan le 9 y { -��! -- MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: May 18, 2010 FILE: SD/042/10 BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 15, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary 1. 2011-018-SD LEGAL: Lot 2, District Lot 276, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan LMP24904 LOCATION: 12562 206 Street OWNER: Jagieet & Parminder Bhuller REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Storm Detention/Groundwater Infiltration System THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO 2011-018-SD. CARRIED Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member *PP116 B EP 8621 A Rem 4 P 3359 RP 16438 LO N rn o eo o � N N POWELL AVE, T PROPERTY J-] LO I- 12575 0^ 19 to m � o o N A 0 N B N c4u� 12565 b12562 LMP 3 432 18 5789 1255589 90 17 0 Cf)cv 12545 12550 -� LMP 22302 P 58281 16 C/) 3 0 12535 N 21 15 59478 EL 12525 6 8 14 �7 0 Rem. 0 cos, C> N 2 W 1 /2 3 s 12 13 *PP118A 125 A o a 1 9 12497 N N p 2 c2 3 12480 N C° 4 0 N m 27 0 125qvF, N 10 N 12485 `LO N 10 LO w N CO 12471 11 N 8 �7 AMP B ,a s Ci f Pitt Mea aws 12562 206 STREET T'i i (j) 7. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF _ - _� -�� MAPLE RIDGE N District Of PLANNING DEPARTMENT Langley 1i 1..- _ 1 -�` SCALE 1:1,500 =f=- DATE: Feb 17, 2011 FILE: 2011-018-SD BY: PC - ' CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 19, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. LAPLANTE, ROGER & MICHELINE DE BELLEFEUILLE Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary LEGAL: Lot 24, Section 3, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP33OO1 LOCATION: 24180 1O1A Avenue OWNER: Roger La Plante & Micheline De Bellefeuille REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Modification of Covenant BB588O93 THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO ROGER LAPLANTE & MICHELINE DE BELLEFEUILLE. Pa u I Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member *PP004 A (P 19526) 21 P 19526 N O PARK N BCP 30529 4ftV 3 4 5 2 1 C) O Ln O n ccoo 00 M dN' r d N N d' N N N 01 6 7 8 B 2 co O T co N N ,'I-N N N 101 AAVE. 101 AAVE. �0 35 36 N T 10151 10152 O 00 � 00 T- N d N 2 j o 10141 37 N N N 11 10 9 G 1 c°0v 34 10146 24 23 22 (� 10131 38 0 10140 0 12 Oa LO 2 CO 33 10138 21 0 10133 N co 39 EL S 10130 M 13 10130 C) 20 CO a- 10123 ~ U m U 14 Q 40 N 10120 m O 44 N 10122 41 19 m 10113 N 15 T 10113 10110 10118 N 45 43 42 18 10103 10100 10107 10108 10093 �g 44 OARK B �7 46 10095 10096431716�Q 10085 10086 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge LID t 45 42 makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy N or present status of the information shown on this map. CI f Pitt j Mea Ws ' Covenant Amendment a o CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF N District of 1 0 j _ MAPLE RIDGE r Langley LICENSES, PERMITS & BYLAWS DEPT. DATE: Jul 18, 2011 FILE: Untitled BY: RO SCALE 1:1,000 FRASER R, CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 20, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary 1. KUGLER, DONALD & JOAN LEGAL: Lot 'S', District Lot 279, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan 114 LOCATION: 20380 Wharf street OWNER: Donald & Joan Kugler REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Covenant- Floodplain THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO DONALD & JOAN KUGLER. CARRIED Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member 1 Q0. CPO cJ N NOW 6' ow NO am w 2 I 6� N &I . N ZGJ , o� 2 2$ A� C t 1 Pitt ; )WS J N �``' � /' District of r Langley SCALE 1:1,000 No s� 0 113 �w T� c9 Subject Parcel !Q 1 The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy or present status of the information shown on this map. 20380 Wharf St. I g o * j CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF RAWMAPLE RIDGE LICENSES, PERMITS & BYLAWS DEPT. DATE: Jul 19, 2011 FILE: Untitled BY: LM FRASEA A. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 20, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Maycr Chairman Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary 1. RZ/078/09 LEGAL: Lot A, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP_ LOCATION: 22525, 22515, 22505, & 22491 Brown Avenue OWNER: MacLean Homes Brown Road REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Covenant - Visitor Parking THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO RZ/078/09. *Din,ayor CARRIED Pau Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member LM P 43240 LMS 4011 Parcel "A" 305 12148 (ECRA) P 46852 1215� 12129 NWS 1688 E 1/2 11 P 7875 E P 61324 P 875 0 v 6 7 8 a 9 i10 4 N N N I 121 AVE o o SUBJECT PROPERTIES 10 N N12 I N2 `V3 N A N A N17 ( N19 20 co 11 N LMP 34533 i Pit6 12085 00 P 80 1 P 843 LMP 44378 H 12080 _ 12063/65 B � 2064 LO LMP 34533 < g o u_ w IL 19930a P 67041 � EP 11502103P 49778�JA P 4076 as2/ss MdNTOSH 11955/65 8&70 14 0 w 4076 N City of Pitt Meadows ' NDistrict of Langley SCALE 1:2,000 0 N N LMP 46699 A P E679 15 14 13 12 11 0 ^ N N N N N N P 081 P f 843 9 8 7 6 5 4 12060 /62 N N N N N BROWN AVE. N BRd w L7 RP 79869 Lu 10 0 n � N N T N Lj 4 C_ 5 6 LOT A 5 (P9687) ause P 081 "LMP 1821 co co 12000�3 12018 LMP 19460 P 9687 P rn 303 A 1 P 44682 N d m d 'PP094 DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD P 60451 O 1 NV 0 N N N N N N C Rem. N Rem. E ¢ m Rem. 118 117 CID 3M West Rem. Municipal Hall NWS 2403 00 81.5 4 11995 P 60562 Feet N cn 4 1CMP Z 00 P 7P63 l 990 11996 00 i f 22491, 22505/15/25 BROWN AVENUE to * CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF �0 MAPLE RIDGE �! ri PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Nov 24, 2009 FILE: RZ/078/09 BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 20, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. SD/120/08 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 4, Section 32, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP43237 13819 232 Street Insignia Homes Brighton Ltd. Subdivision Plans - Phase 9 THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SD/120/08. CARRIED jr Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member 390i 139 AVE k= 1V 9 5 '�J •p •• n Rem 46 3901 F 0' ' Op�4,� ro ry 13895 s R3 47 TEN' iBC 3�6856 13877 2 48 13871 VISTA RIDGE DRIVE c 40 41 42 43 44 12 k1 1 N N 39 B P 1 328 45 46 47 48 ^49 50 51 49 1385a �Ss � T 38 P 1 328 50 13659 1ro 36 37 9 10 51 13855 it 2 12 N 52 1385+ 21 2 19 18 17 BCP3 13 24 232 0 v 16 N 15 ti 14 25 o o z a 6 NN D D sy '1 a7 28 S1 GILBERT DR � o 29 o - �. 57 56 55 54 53 w 30 ��980 � 61 P j713 31 73 72 74 71 68 85 .>13c 13795 ?v �933 a1� 75 BCP 43, 5 '' 0Ge PARK 1�8` 78 a 82 PT 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY 53 PARK BCP 43237 4 PARK i BCP 4`I 35 9 PARFj 13; AVE P 38408 10 FRP , RP 17267 13653 2 7.�55 33�1 ;� �yT 4 ^ I.]FOS 1 73rg2 BCP 39244 11''g2 ,31;, l,7�7� 13�x 1 �3752 1 SILVER VALLEY RD City of Pitt 1 Meadows a 13819 232 STREET 1.: - -!j k, �`" CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF District MAPLE RIDGE of t Langley - PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Jun 3, 2010 FILE: SD/112/08 BY: KK SCALE 1:2.500 FRASER fi. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 20, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. SD/052/10 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lots A & B, both of Section 25, Township 9, New Westminster District, Plan EPP7930 13213 & 13301216 Street Coniagas Ranches Ltd. Covenant - Floodplain THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO SD/052/10. CARRIED r r 1 'f� Pau) Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member rr U) w Q w z N SCALE 1:9,000 City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley 0 T h Subject Properties ,1N m /I 13213/13301-216 St and property directly west rn U) CORPORATION OF i �� THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE r t - PLANNING DEPARTMENT -= BY: JV DATE: Jun 9, 2010 SD/052/010 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES July 20, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary 1. 2011-080-SD LEGAL: Lot 1, Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP33244 LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: 13771232A Street NAG Construction Co. Ltd Strata Plan - Phase 4 THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO 2011-080-SD. Ernie ayor Cl� CARRIED Paul Gill, Acting Chief Administrative Officer Member wBC §3856 2 48 13871 1 49 13863 50 13859 9 10 51 13855 11 w N j 12 �`'�, � ul 52 13851 s s ,ws s 0�56 jom 5453N 13795 S PARK BCP 43235 P 19849 13 SUBJECT PROPERTY 22 2 13862 5 r r3gss 21 3 13842 6 138 13831 r3g22 201'? 25 ' 4 N 19 13805 13802 8 13811 1 13792 9 18 1379s BCP 33244 17 13j82 10 r3781 r3>>2 11 16 r3jss 13771 15 13762 12 t 14 6� 13752 13 sj j 0 13771 232A STREET 10 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE r � PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 S z DATE: May 12, 2010 FILE: SD/038/10 BY: PC ' District of Maple Ridge Deep Raeis Greater Hei,?hPG TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: July 26, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Award of Contract, ITT-PI11-42, 224 Street Loading/Unloading Area District Owned Land Adjacent to Spirit Square EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: At the June 20, 2011 Council Workshop, Council directed staff to prepare the tender documents for the 2241h Street enhancement project and solicit bid proposals, that would allow the project to be completed by the grant deadline of October 31st 2011. We received three bids and recommend that the tender be awarded to Canadian Lawn Care Services Ltd. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Contract ITT-PL11-42 for 224th Street Loading/ Unloading Area, be awarded to Canadian Lawn Care Services Ltd. in the amount of $470,820 plus taxes; and THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The above recommendation follows a public consultation process, as well as specific feedback from the groups who use the park for special events, including the farmers Market, Downtown Maple Ridge BIA, Caribbean festival, Christmas Festival, Canada Day, Community Festival network to ensure that the proposed design met with the approval of the wide range of events that currently occur in memorial Peace Park. The representatives who attended this meeting are supportive of this initiative. b) Desired Outcome: The proposed project will take advantage of the remaining funds from the 224th Street road infrastructure project to construct a loading and unloading zone that will support current and future events on 224th Street and in Memorial Peace parks and Spirit Square. c) Strategic Alignment: The Site is currently designated town center commercial in the official community plan, and is zoned as P1 which allows for public parkland public elementary school development d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The community festivals representatives who reviewed the concept plan for this site have expressed their support for this initiative. • e) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering, Planning and Parks staff have all been involved in the project, and no negative implications have been identified to date. f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Approximately $390,000 will be funded via the remaining downtown enhancement project funds. The other improvements to make the site usable and functional such as the drainage and, irrigation and seeding of the grassed area will be dealt with in the next financial plan amendment, as was previously discussed. g) Alternatives: An alternative may be to leave the site as is, however this is not recommended as the Provincial / federal portions of the road improvement grant would not be utilized. CONCLUSIONS: The concept plan was strongly supported by the community event representatives who met with staff, and time is of the essence to complete this project within the grant funding timeframe. Prepared by: David Boag Director, Parks and Facilities �, z Approved by. Zi� If swift G ` eral tanager, Community Development, Parks and Recreation Approved b dre ood unicipal Eng eer e Concurrence:J.L. (Ji ) Rule Chief Administrative Officer db ■ I 0 C V O U Z Y J N d — ' I ♦ `I ;' i `y `T�. U c u 013 Q Ef y K W 00 all L J _ a �a - a I Zug . N all ■ .s e District of Maple Ridge MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: July 26, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council SUBJECT: Building, Electrical, Gas and Fire Safety Inspection Results for 11701, 11709, 11715 and 11723 Fraser Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The condition and safety of the property and buildings at Northumberland Court has long been a concern of Council and the neighboring property owners. In 2009 this culminated in Council imposing remedial action requirements under s. 73 and s. 74 of the Community Charter on the then owners of the property. A copy of the Council report recommending those remedial actions are attached to this report as Appendix C. The first remedial action requirement was issued to demolish a fire damaged building that had been vacant since 2005. The second remedial action requirement was issued to address a long list of Building and Fire Code infractions in respect of the strata lots and the common property of the four other buildings. The severity of the infractions and the extensive nature of the repairs required many of the occupants to vacate the units. While the fire damaged building was demolished in July of 2009, by the order of Council, the second remedial action requirement pertaining to the remaining sixteen (16) strata lots and the common property of the four (4) buildings, was held in abeyance by Council, due in part to the subsequent vacant occupancy of the buildings and given the fact that the property was in the process of being acquired by a new owner, Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc. Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc. acquired the property in March of 2010. The property owner asserted that the remaining buildings were to be demolished, and submitted an application to rezone the property. This application which includes a redeveloped site with a brand new building received First Reading in November 2010. It has been sixteen (16) months since the buildings came under new ownership and eight (8) months since the First Reading was approved. Over that period of time the buildings have fallen into a further state of disrepair. Despite directives in place to keep the buildings secured against unauthorized entry, the buildings have been found to be insecure at least eight (8) times since January of 2011 and have been vandalized and systematically stripped of anything of value. The conditions have deteriorated to a point where the buildings are no longer fit for habitation and are a safety concern. District staff have had several discussions with the property owner regarding the state of the buildings. The property owner continues to assert that the buildings will be demolished but to date nothing has been done. 1 802 On July 12, 2011, the Manager of Inspection Services and the Fire Chief performed another inspection of the remaining 16 strata lots and the common property of the four buildings. Reports from the Manager of Inspection Services and the Fire Chief are attached to this report as Appendix A and Appendix B and identify a number of major fire and safety regulation violations evident in both the interiors and exteriors of the dwelling units. Both note that the condition of the units and the buildings have deteriorated since the time Council imposed remedial action requirements in respect of the units and the buildings in 2009. District staff also continue to receive complaints from the community regarding the condition of the buildings. The present dilapidated condition of the buildings, coupled with the inability to keep them secured from unauthorized entry, in staff's opinion constitutes an extreme fire hazard and a safety concern that should be addressed as soon as possible. RECOMMENDATION(S) That District Council consider: (a) imposing remedial action requirements, or (b) commencing injunction proceedings in the BC Supreme Court, to enforce its bylaws and exercise its powers against Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc., the owner of the strata lots and the common property of the buildings located at 11701, 11709, 11715 and 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC. a) Background Context: The state of the property and buildings at Northumberland Court has long been a concern of council and the neighboring property owners. Attempts by District staff to deal with fire and life safety issues and bylaw related infractions have not been addressed by the owners. This culminated in council issuing remedial action requirements under s. 73 and s. 74 of the Community Charter on the strata lot owners of the property and the strata corporation. A copy of the Council report recommending those remedial actions are attached to this report as Appendix C. The first remedial action requirement was issued to demolish a fire damaged building that had been vacant since 2005. The second remedial action requirement was issued to address a long list of Building and Fire Code infractions. The severity of the infractions and the extensive nature of the repairs required many of the occupants to vacate the units. While the fire damaged building was demolished in July of 2009, by the order of Council, the second remedial action requirement pertaining to repairs of the residential units, was held in abeyance by Council, due in part to the subsequent vacant occupancy of the buildings and given the fact that the property was in the process of being acquired by a new owner, Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc. Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc. took ownership of the property in March of 2010 and submitted an application to rezone the property. This application received First Reading in November 2010. The owner has consistently stated a desire to re -develop the property and demolish the structures. Unfortunately, since the new owner has taken possession of the property, the buildings have fallen into a further state of disrepair. Despite directives in place to keep the buildings secured against unauthorized entry, the buildings have been found to be insecure at least eight (8) times since January of 2011 and have been vandalized and systematically stripped of anything of value. A complete inspection of the interior and exterior of the buildings were completed by the Fire Chief and the Manager of Inspection Services on July 12, 2011. The inspection revealed that the buildings have substantially deteriorated over the past eighteen (18) months. Reports on the inspection results from the Fire Chief and the Manager of Inspection Services are attached to this report as Appendix A and Appendix B. Based on the observations of the Manager of Inspection Services and the Fire Chief, the buildings located at 11701, 11709, 11715 and 11723 Fraser Street are in an unsafe condition and contravene the District's Building Bylaw, the District's Fire Bylaw and Provincial Building and Fire Safety Regulations. The Manager of Inspections has determined that the buildings are damaged in excess of 50% of the building's assessed value and therefore in accordance with Section 8.2.4 of the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003 any construction to the buildings must conform to the current District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw and the Provincial Building Code. The Manager of Inspection services notes in his report, that based on the current condition of the buildings and the exterior common property, the costs to rehabilitate these buildings and the property to the standards contained in the BC Building Code 2006 and all other applicable enactments has the potential to exceed the costs of demolishing and rebuilding these buildings. In November 2009, quotations were received from two separate contractors to complete the remedial action requirements imposed by Council for Strata Lot 10 when the owner failed to undertake the remedial action as it was vacant at that time. The quotations to complete the remedial works to the strata lot included a quote of approximately $56,000 and a quote of approximately $85,000. The assessed value for 2011 for the strata lot unit is $5,000. The Fire Chief concludes in his report that the buildings are in such a state of repair that a fire starting within them will spread rapidly and endanger life and property. Firefighters will not be able to enter the buildings to safely fight a fire or rescue anyone that may be inside the buildings. The buildings have a history of being insecure and left in their present condition will be a continued target for vandalism and arson. The Fire Chief concludes in his report that the buildings create an extremely unsafe condition and should be demolished immediately. A recent fire in a nearby vacant building has once again resulted in Council and District staff receiving a number of complaints from residents in the area concerned about the condition of the buildings at Northumberland Court. Residents are concerned that the present state of the buildings creates a nuisance and is a safety concern in the community. b) Desired Outcome(s): The following sections of this report detail two (2) Options for Council's consideration; • Option A - Remedial Action • Option B - Court Proceedings Within the two (2) Options, three (3) Enforcement Alternatives are also detailed for Council's consideration. -3- OPTION A: Remedial Action Powers Pursuant to s. 73(1)(a) of the Community Charter, Council may impose a remedial action requirement in respect of "a building or other structure, an erection of any kind, or a similar matter or thing". Pursuant to s. 73, Council may only impose the remedial action requirement if Council considers that the building is in or creates an unsafe condition, or contravenes the Provincial building regulations or the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw. Pursuant to s. 74(1)(a), Council may declare that "a building or other structure, an erection of any kind, or a similar matter or thing" is a nuisance and impose a remedial action requirement in relation to the nuisance. Section 74(1) also applies in relation to a thing that "council considers to be so dilapidated or unclean as to be offensive to the community". Pursuant to s. 72(2)(b) the remedial action requirement may require the owner or lessee of the building and the owner and occupier of the land on which the building is located to undertake the following measures with respect to the building: i. Remove or demolish it, ii. Fill it in, cover it over or alter it, iii. Bring it up to the standard specified by bylaw, or iv. Otherwise deal with it in accordance with the directions of council or a person authorized by council. Building Bylaw and Building Code The Manager of Inspections has determined that conditions present in many of the dwelling units and common property areas contravene safety standards identified in the Districts' Building Bylaw, the BC Building Code, the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2009 and the B-149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code. Section 20.1 of the District's Building Bylaw requires all construction and repair to damaged areas of a building comply with the current BC Building Code, BC Gas Safety Code, Canadian Electrical Code, the District's bylaws and any other applicable enactments respecting safety. Section 692 of the Local Government Act provides that the building code has the same force and effect as a validly enacted bylaw of the District. Fire Bylaw and Fire Code The Fire Chief has determined the buildings in their present condition constitute a fire hazard and contravene the BC Fire Code. Section 5 of the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988 provides that the National Fire Code of Canada, 1985, as revised is adopted as regulations for the District supplementary to regulations made pursuant to the bylaw. BC Reg. 175/2006 provides that the National Fire Code of Canada 2005 is adopted as the BC Fire Code with certain amendments. -4- Unsafe Condition of the Buildings Both the Manager of Inspections and the Fire Chief are of the opinion that the buildings and common areas are in an unsafe condition due to contravening the District bylaws and Provincial Fire and Building regulations. Nuisance Several residents have complained about the condition of the buildings and common property areas creating a nuisance and putting the community at risk. A recent fire in a nearby vacant building has residents concerned that a similar instance at Northumberland Court will harm their property. As the buildings have been repeatedly found to be insecure, they are creating a safety concern in the community. Remedial Action Requirement Pursuant to its remedial action powers under the Community Charter, if Council considers the strata lots and/or the common property (collectively, the building) to be in a hazardous condition and/or to be a nuisance it could require that the building or buildings be: 1) removed or demolished or 2) brought up to the standard specified by the District's bylaws and the Provincial building regulations. Should Council choose to impose a remedial action requirement to have the buildings be brought up to a standard specified by the District's bylaws and the Provincial building and fire regulations, the remedial action requirement may include a requirement for the owners and the strata corporation to agree with the Manager of Inspections on a scheduled plan by a certain date setting out the dates when certain work will be completed. If the owners and the strata corporation fail to comply with the remedial action requirement, including failing to agree to a schedule or adhering to any dates in the schedule, the District of Maple Ridge could then choose to undertake the work itself. The advantage of Council proceeding with a remedial action requirement is that if the owners and Strata Corporation fail to comply with the remedial action requirement, the District may exercise its powers under s. 17 of the Community Charter and carry out the remedial action requirement at the expense of the owners and Strata Corporation. The District may recover the costs it incurs in the same manner as property taxes provided the appropriate procedures are followed. Council should be aware, however, that any Owner or the Strata Corporation could challenge the remedial action requirement in the court. It is unknown how much time would be required for the court to rule on the remedial action requirement. Enforcement Alternative 1: Should Council choose to impose a remedial action requirement to have the buildings demolished and removed, the following wording is suggested: WHEREAS Division 12 of Part 3 of the Community Charter (the "Charter") authorizes Council to impose a remedial action requirement on the owner or owners of a building including a requirement to remove or demolish the building where: 1) Council considers that the building is in or creates an unsafe condition; 2) Council considers that the building contravenes the Provincial building regulations or a District bylaw under s. 8(3)(1) (buildings and other structures); and/or 3) Council declares the building is a nuisance; -5- AND WHEREAS Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc., Inc. No. 874109 (the "Owner") is the registered owner of 16 strata lots known as Units #5, #6, #7 and #8, 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC; Unit #9, #10, #11,and #12, 11709 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC; Units #13, #14, #15 and#16, 11701 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge; Units #17,#18, #19 and #20, 11715 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC and legally described as: - Strata Lot 5 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1, - Strata Lot 6 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1, - Strata Lot 7 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1, - Strata Lot 8 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 9 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 10 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown on form 1; Strata Lot 11 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 12 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common .property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 13 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 14 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 15 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 16 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 17 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown on form 1; Strata Lot 18 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 19 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 20 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; (the "Strata Lots"); AND WHEREAS the buildings containing the Strata Lots includes common property (the Strata Lots and the common property collectively being, the "Buildings") that is owned by Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc., Inc. No. 874109 as the registered owner of all 20 strata lots shown on form 1 filed with Strata Plan NW-8 ("The Owners, Strata Plan NW- 8"); NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, resolves as follows: 1. THAT Council hereby considers that the Buildings located at 11701, 11709, 11715 and 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC; are in a hazardous condition, within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Charter, as a result of the Buildings contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003, the BC Building Code, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988 and/or the BC Fire Code. 2. THAT Council hereby considers that the Buildings are in and creates an unsafe condition, within the meaning of Section 73(2)(a) of the Charter, as a result of the Buildings being insecure on numerous occasions over the past year, the Buildings continuing to deteriorate and/or the Buildings contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003, the BC Building Code, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988, and/or the BC Fire Code. 3. THAT Council hereby declares that the Buildings are a nuisance, within the meaning of Section 74 (2) of the Charter, as Council considers the Buildings to be so dilapidated and unclean as to be offensive and pose a risk to the community. 4. THAT Council hereby requires pursuant to its remedial action powers under Part 3, Division 12 of the Charter that the Owners, and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8: -7- a. demolish and remove the Buildings no later than thirty (30) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District to the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8; b. erect a strongly constructed fence at least 1.5 meters tall around the area where the Buildings were formerly located immediately after the Buildings are demolished and removed and maintain the fence until the requirement in s. 4(c) of this resolution has been complied with; and c. fill in and level any hole created by the removal of the Buildings no later than thirty (30) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District to the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8; (collectively, the "Remedial Action Requirement"). 5. THAT the District advise the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8 that they may request that Council reconsider the Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District written notice within 14 days of the date on which notice under s. 77 of the Charter was sent and that if any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the date specified for compliance, the District may take action in accordance with section 17 of the Charter and undertake any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement without further notice to and at the expense of the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8. Enforcement Alternative 2: Should Council choose to impose a remedial action requirement to provide the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8 the option to either: 1) bring the Buildings up to standards specified by the District's bylaws and Provincial building regulations or 2) have the buildings demolished and removed, the following wording is suggested: WHEREAS Division 12 of Part 3 of the Community Charter (the "Charter") authorizes Council to impose a remedial action requirement on the owner or owners of a building including a requirement to remove or demolish the building where: 1) Council considers that the building is in or creates and unsafe condition; 2) Council considers that the building contravenes the Provincial building regulations or a District bylaw under s. 8(3)(1) (buildings and other structures); and/or 3) Council declares the building is a nuisance; AND WHEREAS Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc., Inc. No. 874109 (the "Owner") is the registered owner of 16 strata lots known as Units #5, #6, #7 and #8, 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC; Unit #9, #10, #11,and #12, 11709 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC; Units #13, #14, #15 and#16, 11701 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge; Units #17,#18, #19 and #20, 11715 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC and legally described as: Strata Lot 5 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1, - Strata Lot 6 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1, IWIIIIII Strata Lot 7 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1, Strata Lot 8 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 9 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 10 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown on form 1; Strata Lot 11 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 12 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 13 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 14 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 15 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 16 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 17 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown on form 1; - Strata Lot 18 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 19 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; IM - Strata Lot 20 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; (the "Strata Lots"); AND WHEREAS the buildings containing the Strata Lots includes common property (the Strata Lots and the common property collectively being, the "Buildings") that is owned by Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc., Inc. No. 874109 as the registered owner of all 20 strata lots shown on form 1 filed with Strata Plan NW-8 ("The Owners, Strata Plan NW- 8"); NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, resolves as follows: 1. THAT Council hereby considers that the Buildings located at 11701, 11709, 11715, 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge BC, are in a hazardous condition, within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Charter, as a result of the Buildings contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003, the BC Building Code, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988 and/or the BC Fire Code. 2. THAT Council hereby considers that the Buildings are in and create an unsafe condition, within the meaning of Section 73(2)(a) of the Charter, as a result of the Buildings being insecure on numerous occasions over the past year, the Buildings continuing to deteriorate and/or the Buildings contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003, the BC Building Code, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988, and/or the BC Fire Code. 3. THAT Council hereby declares that the Buildings are a nuisance, within the meaning of Section 74 (2) of the Charter, as Council considers the Buildings to be so dilapidated and unclean as to be offensive and pose a risk to the community. 4. THAT Council hereby requires pursuant to its remedial action powers under Part 3, Division 12 of the Charter that the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8 either: a. undertake the following: demolish and remove the Buildings no later than thirty (30) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District to the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8; ii. erect a strongly constructed fence at least 1.5 meters tall around the area where the Buildings were formerly located immediately after the Buildings are demolished and removed and maintain the fence until the requirement in s. 4(c) of this resolution has been complied with; and iii. fill in and level any hole created by the removal of the Buildings no later than sixty (60) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District to the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8; or 0i[i2 b. undertake the following: agree in writing with the District's Manager of Inspection Services on a scheduled plan of repair, renovation and rehabilitation of the Buildings including completion dates to, in the opinion of the District's Manager of Inspection Services, ensure the Buildings' safety and habitability in compliance with the standards specified in the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Bylaw No. 4111-1988, the BC Building Code 2006 and the BC Fire Code 2006 no later than thirty (30) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District to the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8; commence the scheduled work and proceed diligently and in a timely manner in strict accordance with the dates set out in the agreed scheduled plan pursuant to section 4(b)(i) of this resolution no later than thirty (30) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District to the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8; and iii. complete all scheduled work and obtain from the District's Manager of Inspections an occupancy permit, no later than 360 days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District to the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8; (collectively, the "Remedial Action Requirement"). 5. THAT the District advise the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8 that they may request that Council reconsider the Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District written notice within 14 days of the date on which notice under s. 77 of the Charter was sent and that if any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement option chosen by the Owner and/or The Owner, Strata Plan NW-8 is not completed by the date specified for compliance (including adhering to the completion dates specified in any scheduled plan agreed to pursuant to section 4(b)(i) of this resolution), the District may take action in accordance with section 17 of the Charter and undertake any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement (including demolishing and removing the Buildings despite the Remedial Action Requirement option chosen by the Owner) without further notice to and at the expense of the Owner and The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8. OPTION B: Court Proceedings Pursuant to s. 274 of the Community Charter, the District may commence injunction proceedings in the B.C. Supreme Court against the strata corporation and the owners of the strata lots to enforce, or prevent or restrain the contravention of the District's bylaws and the provisions of the Community Charter and the Local Government Act. The District could seek an order from the court to prevent the strata corporation and the owners from continuing to breach the District's bylaws including the District's Building Bylaw No.6180 - 2003, the B.C. Building Code (pursuant to s. 692 of the Local Government Act), and the District's Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111 - 1988 and to bring Units 5, 6, 7 and 8, 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC; Units 9, 10, 11 and 12 11709 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC; Units 13, 14, 15 and 16 11701 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC and Units 17, 18, and 20 - 11 - 11715 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC into compliance with the District's bylaws. If the strata corporation and the owners fail to bring the buildings into compliance with the District's bylaws, the District could seek an order from the court to have the District bring the buildings into compliance with the District's bylaws at the expense of the strata corporation and the owners. The advantage of this option is that if the District is successful it would have an enforceable order from the court. 'The disadvantage is that it would take a considerable amount of time and can be quite costly. Enforcement Alternative 3: Should Council choose to commence injunction proceedings in the B.C. Supreme Court against any of the owners of the strata lots and/or the common property to enforce, or prevent or restrain the contravention of the District's bylaws and the provisions of the Community Charter and the Local Government Act the following wording is suggested: That the District of Maple Ridge authorize its solicitors, Young, Anderson to commence injunction proceedings in the B.C. Supreme Court to enforce the District's Building Bylaw No. 6180 - 2003, the B.C. Building Code (pursuant to s. 692 of the Local Government Act), the District's Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111 - 1988, and any other bylaws the District's solicitors consider necessary against; - Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc., Inc. No. 874109 as the registered owner of 16 strata lots known as Units #5, #6, #7 and #8, 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC; Unit #9, #10, #11,and #12, 11709 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC; Units #13, #14, #15 and#16, 11701 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge; Units #17,#18, #19 and #20, 11715 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC and legally described as: - Strata Lot 5 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1, - Strata Lot 6 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1, - Strata Lot 7 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1, - Strata Lot 8 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 9 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 10 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown on form 1; -12- - Strata Lot 11 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 12 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 13 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 14 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 15 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 16 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 17 District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown on form 1; - Strata Lot 18 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 19 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; - Strata Lot 20 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; and against Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc., Inc. No. 874109 as the owner of the common property of the buildings containing the strata lots shown on form 1 filed with Strata Plan NW-8 ("The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8") and to make such incidental filings and decisions as necessary to undertake such proceedings. Recommended Approach Based on the conditions of the buildings, the significant safety risks, the fact that the buildings continue to deteriorate and have been found to be insecure on several occasions over the past year and that the buildings have not been repaired or removed in the eighteen (18) months since acquired by Northumberland Fraser Street Holdings Inc, it is recommended that Council proceed with Option A and Enforcement Alternative 1. -13- c) Business Plan/Financial Implications: Council should be aware that any remedial action requirements issued by Council may be challenged by the owners and the strata corporation in Supreme Court. Any court proceedings will require substantial legal resources and may take a considerable amount of time before arguments are heard by the Court. c) Alternatives: Staff can continue to issue safety orders and clean up orders as detailed in District of Maple Ridge Bylaws and the BC Fire Code for the buildings and property located at 11701, 11705, 11715 and 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, B.C. CONCLUSIONS: The conditions of the buildings and property located at 11701, 11705, 11715 and 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, B.C. constitute a serious safety concern and do not conform to the District's Building or Fire Bylaw and have become a nuisance to the community. Staff recommends that Council proceed with Option A, Remedial Action Powers, and select Enforcement Alternative 1, to impose a remedial action r uirement on the owner to remove or demolish the buildings. 0 r�, A , Prepared by: Dane Spence Fire Chief, Director of Community Fire Safety Services r Prepa'red-by:�� Liz Holitzki / Direq�or, Licences Permits and Bylaws Approved by: Frank Quinn 4 / General Manager, Public Works and Development Services Approved b . Paul Gill General Manager, Corporate and Financial Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer 14- Appendix A (July 26, 2011) MAPLI= RIDGE British Columbia Interoffice Memorandum TO: LIZ HOLITZKI - DIRECTOR LICENSES, PERMITS AND BYLAWS FROM: STEPHEN J. COTE-ROLVINK - MANAGER INSPECTION SERVICES SUBJECT: 11701, 11709, 11715 & 11723 FRASER STREET (NORTHUMBERLAND COURT) DATE: JULY 12, 2011 SUMMARY On July 12, 2011, the District Fire Chief, Dane Spence, and I performed a fire and life safety inspection of the buildings and common property located at 11701/09/15/23 Fraser Street. Access was gained through removal of the plywood covering the entry doors to the buildings units. It was noted at this time, that although the buildings appeared secure the door coverings were insufficiently anchored to prevent access to the buildings interiors. Upon entering the buildings it was noted that the interior of the buildings have been accessed by persons since these buildings had been made secure in November 2010. It was later found that access had been gained to each of these buildings either by direct access through the boarded over doors or through holes created through the exterior walls in either the electrical rooms, under the exterior decks or through the exterior crawl spaces access for those units so equipped. Holes were also found in the unit fire separation walls allowing internal access between the units. As a result of this access, components of the buildings electrical system and plumbing systems have been or are in the process being removed from all units. Based on the damage done to the interior of the buildings by persons and the elements as well as removal of elements critical to the life and health safety of the occupants, I am of the opinion that the buildings in their current condition are uninhabitable and in contravention of the BC Building Code, Canadian Electrical Code and the Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code. In my opinion, these buildings are damaged more than 50% of their assessed value as shown on the 2011 assessment roll. Section 8.2.4 of the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180 - 2003 provides that where a building is damaged by any cause to the extent of more than 50% of its assessed value as shown on the last assessment roll upon which the building was assessed, the District's Building Bylaw applies to the whole building and to all construction done in connection with the repairs of the buildings. Section 20.1 of the District's Building Bylaw requires that all construction comply with the current British Columbia Building Code, the District's Building Bylaw and all other applicable codes and bylaws referenced there in. It is also evident that the interior and exterior items outlined in my report of February 16, 2009 (Attached as Appendix ) for strata property's 11701/09/15/23 Fraser Street and the common 1 Page 2 Building Report Northumbrland property in respect of this development have not been addressed for the majority of the units. Those units that had complied with this report have since been damaged to a state beyond what was found in our February 2009 inspections. The current state of these buildings are now at a level of damage beyond what had been evident in 2009. In addition to the items identified in the aforementioned report following is a general list of the additional areas of contravention to the Districts bylaws that no longer permit these buildings to be fit for human habitation. Strata Common Property • Windows and doors damaged or missing. (Photographs 03, 04, 75, 127, 132, 214, 410) • Exterior fittings removed or damaged to the point of no longer preventing the intrusion of rodents, insects or vermin. (Photograph 449) • Decks and suspended walkways continue to degrade and rot. (Photographs 117, 270, 275, 369, 404) • Deck supports missing or rotting away. (Photographs 331, 391, 392) • Open excavations around 11709 make approach to perimeter unsafe. (Photographs 239, 330, 390) • Collapse of a portion of the asphalt area adjacent to 11709 Fraser Street. (Photographs 128, 129) • Exterior guard rails missing or damaged. (Photographs 01, 263, 331, 370) Interior Space all Units • Fire separations on main and second floor plus crawl spaces are damaged to the point of not being able to perform their intended functions. (Photographs 14, 93, 99, 137, 198, 284, 299, 318) • Damage to main electrical rooms and removal of components therein requiring replacement. (Photographs 07, 115, 368, 398) • Removal of panel feeds from electrical room to units panels, removal of components within the panels and the removal of interior distribution wiring. (Photographs 15, 43, 97,280, 453) • Water distribution piping throughout the units plus individual fixture piping have been removed. (Pictures 27, 64, 279) • Damage to interior wall, ceiling and floor finishes has allowed for the potential of asbestos and lead paint contamination of interior spaces. (Photographs 72, 96, 139, 236) • Generation of mold on all interior surfaces through the damage to or lack of windows and doors allowing moisture penetration to health risk levels. (Photographs 31, 105, 173, 195, 227, 529) • Lack of hand and guard rails. (Photographs 49, 73, 213) • Damage to plumbing and electrical appliances. (Photographs 65, 81, 107, 163, 245, 283, 286) • Damage and removal of portions of the sewage piping. (Photographs 158, 163) • Collapse or rot of heating distribution piping. (Photographs 37, 39, 62) • Continued degradation of structural components due to water ingress. (Photographs 29, 31, 108, 154, 156) Page 3 Building Report Northumbrland • Water penetration through failed roofing membranes. (Photographs 105, 306, 493) The following is a breakdown of Sections from the BC Building Code that are not being met. These items I consider to be of health and life safety concerns in accordance with the objective statements contained within the BC Building Code. The code requires an exterior grade door at each entrance to a dwelling unit: • Article 9.6.2.1. Doors for Dwelling Units The code requires openings in exterior walls to be fitted with construction to maintain the integrity of the air and vapour barrier between interior and exterior environments: • Article 9.25.3.3. Continuity of the Air Barrier System o Sentence 9.25.3.3.(6) - Penetrations of the air barrier system, such as those created by the installation of doors, windows, electrical wiring, electrical boxes, piping or duct work, shall be sealed to maintain the integrity of the air barrier system over the entire surface. o Article 9.7.2.1. Window Standards The code requires that persons be protected from fall hazards where the change in floor elevation exceeds 600mm. The code also requires that you are able to stabilize yourself while negotiating stairs with more than 2 risers. • Section 9.8. Stairs, Ramps, Handrails and Guards o Subsection 9.8.7. Handrails ■ Articles 9.8.7.1., .2..4., .5., .6. & .7. - These articles deal with Required Handrails, Continuity of Handrails, Height of Handrails, Ergonomic Design, Projections into Stairs and Ramps & Design and Attachment of Handrails respectively. None of these areas are met in the current buildings. o Subsection 9.8.8. Guards ■ Articles 9.8.8.1., .2., .3., .5. & .6. - These Articles deal with Required Guards, Loads on Guards, Height of Guards, Openings in Guards and Design to prevent Climbing. None of these items are met within these buildings nor on the exterior for those units requiring exterior guard rails. The code requires that multi unit buildings be constructed in such a manner so as to prevent the spread of fire between units for a prescribed period of time. • Subsection 9.10.9. Fire Separations between Rooms and Spaces within Buildings o Article 9.10.9.2. Continuous Barrier - continuity of fire separations,. o Sentence 9.10.9.14. (3) Separation of Residential Suites - requires the fire separation to have a 1.0 hour fire resistance rating. The code requires that roofs or surfaces acting as roofs, in the collection and redirection of precipitation, do not permit precipitation to enter into the building. • Section 9.26. Roofing o Article 9.26.1.1. Purpose of roofing 3 Page 4 Building Report Northumbrland ■ Sentence 9.26.1.1. (1) -Roofs shall be protected with roofing, including flashing, installed to shed rain effectively.... ■ Sentence 9.26.1.1.(2) - defines what is to be considered a roof and which now includes any platform that accumulates or drains precipitation. o Subsection 9.26.2. Roofing Materials ■ This subsection identifies what the code considers to be acceptable roofing materials. o Subsection 9.26.4. Flashing at Intersections ■ Sentence 9.26.4.1. (2) - deals with platforms that effectively act as roofs for the accumulation or drainage of precipitation which is the case with the raised wooden walkways and concrete sidewalks. The code requires interior finishes to comply to specific standards to ensure their ability to perform their intended functions and sets out specific criteria depending on where in the building these elements are to be located. • Subsection 9.29.5. Gypsum Board Finishes o Article 9.29.5.2. Materials - specifies the standards to which the products must comply. • Section 9.30. - Flooring o This Section defines where, the quality of finished flooring and the specific nature of its qualities based on location of installation. ■ Article 9.30.1.1. - Required Finished Flooring ■ Article 9.30.1.2. - Water Resistance ■ Article 9.31.1.4. - Finish Quality The code requires a minimum number and type of plumbing facilities to ensure basic human needs are being met and a minimum level of healthy sanitation be available. • Subsection 9.31.3. Water Supply and Distribution. • Subsection 9.31.4. Required Facilities. • Subsection 9.31.5. Sewage Disposal. • Subsection 9.31.6. Service Water Heating Facilities. The code requires ventilation and heating system to ensure a minimum level of acceptable comfort and air quality which are no longer available within these buildings. • Subsection 9.32.1. - General o Identifies the basic need for ventilation of spaces during the heating and non -heating seasons. • Subsection 9.33.2. - Required Heating Systems o Identifies the minimum acceptable heating system and its distribution. The required electrical facilities for each unit have been damaged or removed. These facilities are required as indicated under the following criteria: • Subsection 9.34.4. General o Article 9.34.1.2. Required Facilities - Electrical facilities. 4 Page 5 Building Report Northumbrland The above items are in addition to those already identified in my report of February 16, 2009. Due to the invasion of molds into the structures, and the damage to interior finishes the buildings would also require evaluations by individuals or corporation certified by the Canadian Registration Board of occupational Hygienists or the American Board of Industrial Hygiene and firms approved to evaluate the hazardous materials contained within these buildings. These evaluations would need to be completed prior to workers entering the buildings to perform any form of activity within these structures. CONCLUSION In my opinion, the degradation of the buildings due to human intervention, intrusion of the exterior environment and inadequate maintenance has created an unsafe condition where the main life safety and health components of the buildings have been compromised and are no longer able to perform their intended functions. Based on this and the obvious destruction to the buildings, they are now at the point that more than fifty percent (50%) of their assessed value has been affected. Due to the aforementioned conditions, the buildings are uninhabitable in their current condition and pose a risk to any person entering into the buildings or entering onto the property. In my opinion, based on the current condition of the buildings and the exterior common property, the costs to rehabilitate these buildings and the property to the standards contained in the BC Building Code 2006 and all other applicable enactments has the potential to exceed the costs of demolishing and rebuilding these buildings. Stephen J. Cate-Rolvi , R.B.O., C.R.B.O. Manager of Inspection Services Local Safety Manager Attachments - Photos Si v *. E I U _ _� b td _ F MM' i l t ��I" � ,.. ��`a is �;�� ', _ . i is �cr: ;�, r. �3 .: � , F... _... :. . V'_ �, Ge �r�b�,i �. . i tt ke ':I j: � -�' T 1 �. _a. �_ 1 i , � 1 r � �_ ��1 �'� _ � _i- S k, �' �� 1 •{ � d i � L� -- �. �. •� r � sx- ! fiy ,h /y .1 N *":3j1 v: �q Ra k,I • - k r yy i1 i } l d �� 1, a y s. fir~ + r �r K" 3 0' i t w r fflpl� Appendix B (July 26, 2011) MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: CC: Summary Interoffice Memorandum LIZ HOLITZKI, DIRECTOR BUSINESS LICENCES, PERMITS AND BYLAWS DANE SPENCE, FIRE CHIEF/DIRECTOR COMMUNITY FIRE SAFETY 11701, 11709, 11715, AND 11723 FRASER STREET (NORTHUMBERLAND COURT) JULY 13, 2011 On July 12, 2011, the Manager of Inspection Services, Mr. Stephen Cote-Rolvink and I performed Fire and Life Safety Inspections at the buildings and common property located at 11701, 11709, 11715, and 11723 Fraser Street. These premises are composed of four structures, each containing four separate living units that have been vacant since November 2010 with the electrical, gas and water services all being disconnected. The buildings have been left exposed to the elements and are being systematically vandalized and stripped of anything of value. Unauthorized persons have repeatedly entered the structures to remove copper pipe and wire, and in doing so have removed large sections of drywall that is intended to prevent the spread of fire. Guard rails have been removed and unprotected openings in the floors of some units present a serious hazard to anyone who enters these units. These buildings were found to be unsecured on eight separate occasions since January 2011 and were found to be insecure on the day of inspection. The buildings were subject to a detailed inspection in February of 2009 and it should be noted that the physical condition of all of the units and the buildings has deteriorated significantly since that time, rendering them completely unfit for human habitation. The deficiencies noted in my report of February of 2009, a copy of which is attached, have not been addressed for most of the units and those that had addressed the issues presented have now been damaged or deteriorated to the point they no longer comply with those recommendations The Building and Fire Code deficiencies are too numerous to mention in detail, and given the fact that the units are not occupied this report will focus on the major deficiencies that make these unoccupied buildings a fire hazard. I find that these premises are now in such a state of disrepair that a fire starting within them will spread rapidly and endanger life and property. Firefighters will not be able to enter the structures to safely fight a fire or rescue anyone that may be inside the structures. Furthermore, the close proximity of these buildings to adjacent residential properties constitutes an extreme fire hazard. Northumberland Court was originally a complex of five buildings and has experienced multiple fires over the past six years. The building located at 11731 Fraser Streer was damaged by fire in 2005 and eventually demolished in 2009. Since January of 2004, the Maple Ridge Fire Department has responded to at least 72 incidents at Northumberland Court and at least 11 of these calls have been for fire related emergencies. The following major code violations were found and referenced in the applicable sections of the B.C. Fire Code, 2006 edition. I will explain the context and relevance of each code violation, followed by outline of the code infractions found in and around each residential unit and reference photographs where applicable. Following is a list of the major code violations in evidence at the time of inspection. This list includes applicable referenced from the B.C. Fire Code 2006 Edition and explanation of same. Following this is a list of infractions on a per unit basis with associated reference pictures. Fire code infraction and relevance to inspection findings; Building Securi All four buildings have been found _insecure in contravention of Section 2.4.6.1 of the BC Fire Code. Section 2.4.6.1 states: Vacant buildings shall be secured against unauthorized entry. The buildings have been found to be insecure on at least eight occasions since January 2011. Photographs numbered 64, 65, 72 and 316 illustrate evidence of vandalism and theft of cooper water pipe that has occurred inside the structures. Damaged or missing fire separations All of the units were found to have damaged fire separations that are required to help prevent the horizontal spread of fire. These separations also provide thermal protection to the structural wood elements of the building. Section 2.2.1.1(3) of the BC Fire Code provides: Rooms, corridors, shafts and other spaces shall be separated where practical by fire separations conforming to the British Columbia Building Code. Furthermore, section 2.2.1.2 (1) provides: Where fire separations are damaged so as to affect their integrity, they shall be repaired so that the integrity of the fire separation is maintained. Photographs numbered 99, 210 and 212 illustrate the damaged fire separations between the individual units. Hazardous Substances Many of these units have large areas of the drywall and wood surfaces covered in mold. Roof leaks are evident and the opening window areas allow water to enter the structures. Photographs 34, 173 and 195 illustrate mold found throughout the structures. Under the heading Health, 2.2.1.1.1 of the B.C. Fire code states "An objective of this code is to limit the probability that, as a result of specific circumstances related to the building or facility, a person will be exposed to an unacceptable risk of illness." Further more, under the heading of OH5 Hazardous Substances Containment; An objective of this code is to limit the probability that as a result of the condition of specific elements the public will be exposed to an unacceptable risk of illness due to the release of hazardous substances from the building or facility. It should be noted that these structures are of the vintage where it is reasonable to assume that building materials such as drywall filler and ceiling spray texture would contain asbestos and lead paints. The poor condition of these building elements exposes those entering the buildings to potentially hazardous materials. Work Safe B.C. Regulation, 6.2 and Sections 6.3 to 6.32 apply to a workplace where a worker is or may be exposed to potentially hazardous levels of asbestos fibre. Anyone entering the structures should be made aware of the presence of potentially hazardous materials. Combustible material There is combustible waste such as, newspapers, discarded building materials, furniture and rubbish that has accumulated throughout a majority of the units which, in my opinion, constitutes an undue fire hazard that could easily be ignited by vagrants or vandals. Section 2.4.1.1 of the BC Fire Code provides: Combustible waste material in and around buildings shall not be permitted to accumulate in quantities or location that will constitute an undue fire hazard, Photographs 167, 183, 298 and 335 were taken inside the structures and show discarded furniture and other material. This accumulation of combustible material, coupled with the missing and damaged fire separations, creates a hazardous situation where a fire has the ability to spread rapidly throughout the buildings. The crawlspaces were often found to contain discarded materials and combustible waste; in contravention of section 2.4.1.1 of the BC Fire Code that states: Combustible waste material in and around buildings shall not be permitted to accumulate in quantities or location that will constitute an undue fire hazard, and Section 2.4.1.3) provides that: Horizontal concealed spaces, such as crawl spaces and ceiling spaces, shall not be used for the storage of combustible materials. Fire department emergency access to buildings The porches and decks that provide access to the buildings are in very poor condition due to rot and decay. Not only are they unsuitable for safe access to the buildings, their presence creates an obstacle for firefighters placing ladders against the buildings in an emergency. Photographs 270, 275, 331 and 404 illustrate the condition of the wooden decks and stairs that provide access to the structures. There is a large sink hole that has developed in the parking lot adjacent to Unit # 10 that measures approximately, 2 metres by 1 metre by 1 metre deep. Photographs 128 and 129 illustrate the depth and location of this hazard. Section 2.5.1.2.(1) of the BC Fire Code states; Access panels or windows provided to facilitate access for fire fighting operations shall be maintained free of obstruction. Missing handrails and_guards Several of the units in the buildings inspected had missing handrails and guards on stairs and around openings on the second floor. The unguarded openings on the second floor(s) present an extreme hazard to anyone who enters the buildings. If emergency workers attempted to enter these buildings under smoke and fire conditions, the lack of hand/guard rails could lead to a fall that would result in serious injury or death. Section 9.8.8.1 (1) of the BC Building Code requires that a guard(s) be placed around openings where the elevation change is greater than 600 millimetres, to prevent falls. Firefighters entering these structures would also be at risk of injury from these unguarded openings. Photographs 216, 328, 492 and 500 illustrate missing guard rails and unguarded openings inside the units. Fire code deficiencies and life safM concems noted inside the individual residential units: Unit 5 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 170, 172, 173, 184 and 195 Unit 6 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 137, 139, 141 and 162 Unit 7 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 210, 212, and 221 Missing handrail on stairs and unguarded opening: Photographs 213, 216, and 220 Unit 8 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 233, 234, 236 and 240 Unit 9 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 342 and 343 Unit 10 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 316 and 318 Unguarded opening in the floor: Photographs 327 and 328 Unit 11 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 280, 284 and 286 Unit 12 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 299, 304, and 309 Unit 13 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 447, 453, 454, and 464 Unit 14 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 416, 427, 432 and 434 Unit 15 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 512 and 531 Missing handrail on stairs: Photograph 513 Unguarded opening in the floor: Photograph 517 Unit 16 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 488, 501 and 503 Missing handrail on stairs and unguarded opening: Photographs 489 and 500 Unit 17 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 40, 45, 46 and 51 Missing handrail on stairs and unguarded opening: Photograph 49 and 53 Unguarded opening in the floor: Photograph 491 Unit 18 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 14, 15 and 35 Unit 19 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 71 and 72 Missing handrail on stairs and unguarded opening: Photographs 71 and 73 Unit 20 Damaged fire separations: Photographs 92, 93, 97 and 100 Conclusion I find that these premises are now in such a state of disrepair that a fire starting within them will spread rapidly and endanger life and property. Firefighters will not be able to enter the structures to safely fight a fire or rescue anyone that may be trapped inside the structures. The buildings have a history of being insecure and left in their present condition are a continued target for vandalism and arson. Accordingly, I find that the buildings create an extremely unsafe condition and should be demolished immediately. Dane Spence Fire Chief/ Director Community Fire Safety Maple Ridge Fire Department '�,r Ipnm_ cm Of ■ �1117 FI-01.1 4b J. C P� _ e� ,l�t�, V I'w. J' .f'' it �.1—� _ -�_. �':�•�.' x �. ro u jWT k FRI �x ..t�a�. ,,_ Tf � -• ,\_ .--- _ �,. u 3 [' � ' r , I ,` .,..�` (.+ ,� Y "`1 < << r � t. �<• �� ,� �� + 1 i, �4 �, �� ; �Y �o , a � _ �� , ,°. � _ �,,,� = y -nor/ �- ,_ ,� � , 4 � +�' �' � '� ,.� /,y� f-.�- �� wR v ...�.., y � .�s _ _ _.. - \\ r. i �t4. \_ c �j � .. � ti 1 mr' ;; ,� ;: ��. a� �, , ,;. �� ,;;'-: t;�;a ,�- ,.. . _ ` I� ,�, � ski ,. ,` j �- p,,� j _�� . ,da` ' : ��',..� A I, J) , n E f I. i ,rv--: I '= Appendix C (July 26, 2011) District -'--�---� Maple �' '--co- T0: His Worship Mayor Ernie Oaykin DATE: March 5,2UU9 and Members ofCouncil FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council 8UBUE(T: Building, Electrical, Gas and Fire Safety Inspection Results for 11701, 11709, 1171Eand 11723Fraser Street EXEOUTVESUMMARY As @ result of complaints received from the public concerning the safety and state of the bui|UinQs, Council directed staff to perform inspections and gather information and evidence for Council to consider enforcing its byla ws and exercising its powers against the owners of 11701, 11709. 11715 and 11723Fraser Street. The buildings were inspected in both 2006 and 2007 due to safety concerns and at that time a number offina. electrical and r-as Safety issues were identified in a number of the dwelling units, Safely Officers issued repair orders and repairs to the unite were completed, Unfortunate|y, tampering with the electrical and gas systems, the removal ofinter connected smoke detectors, the storage of combustible items in crawl spaces and backyards and the damage to fire separation protection installed between the units is an on going problem in m number of the units. Safety Officers have ordered the power disconnected to a number of units in the past, as aresult Ofserious e|not/ico|safety issues identified during inspections. A complete inspection of the interior and exterior of the buildings was completed by Hna. Building, Electrical and Gas Safety Officers during the weeks of February Qth to 201h'2009. Inspections revealed a number ofSafaty issues and non compliance with Provincial Bui|ding, Electrical, Gas and Fire Safety Regulations. Reports On the inspection results from the Fire Chief and the Manager Of Inspections are attached tuthis report asAppendix Aand Appendix B. Council and District staff has received a number of resident complaints about the condition of the buildings and the property. Residents are concerned that the state of the buildings and the property creates a nuisance and puts the entire community at risk, Residents are reqjesting that Council deal with the buildings and the property. The complaints are attached to this report as Appendix C. That District Council consider imposing ngnled|8| action requirements or commencing injunction proceedings in the BC Supreme Court to enforce its bylaws and exercise its powers against the Owners, Strata Plan NW8for buildings located et117D1'117O9,1I715and 11723Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC a) Background[ontext: Northumberland Court consists of five bUi|diD'S with four strata |OtS in each building. Mr. j8gdevA±hwe| inthe owner offourteen Qfthe strata lots. K8: Michael Kwasnita isthe owner of two of the strata lots and KXa Sonia Athmm|' Wis. Regina 0ernitzsoh, Mc Sean Myers and &4s. Mary Jones are each the owner ofone strata lot. All strata lots are utilized as renta� units with the exception of the lots owned by Ms. Jones, Ms. Oemitzsch and Mir. Myers. In September of2OU8, Fire and Building Department officials conducted safety inspections in all of the dwelling units located at 11701. 11709. 11715 and 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge' BC. An Order pursuant to the 8r}1iok Columbia Fire Code was issued to a Mr. ]u8dev Singh Athwal, in his capacity as Chair of Strata Corporation NW8, on September 8, 2006. The Order required the owners and strata corporation to engage the services of fire and |iha Safety oode consultant to review the buildings and property and bring the buildings and property into compliance with the 8CFire Code and the BCFire Services Act. |nparticular, the Order required the insta||otion of interconnected smoke alarms in all dwelling units, repair or replacement of fire separations between the dwelling units and ensuring required exits from the dwelling units were maintained in accordance with the BC Fire COde, The Order issued by the Fire Dep8rtnnSntwas appealed to the PrOv|DCi8| Fire Commissioner byMr. Athvvm|. On October 12, 2006, the Provincial Fire CommisSiVnerrnndifiedLhe Order in terms of the completion dates for the works outlined in the original Order. On October 23, 2008 a Petition to the Supreme Court of British Columbia was filed by the m*naro of Strata NWJ8s�okin8areview ofthe decision oftileFire CumnmiasionermadennOctober 12'2OO8. On OOtnber25, 2008. Mr.Athwa{ applied for and was issued an emergency repair pe/mitby the District of Maple Ridge to complete the works outlined in 'the Fire Department Order issued on September 8, 2006, Repair works to install interconnected smoke alarms in all units, repair or install approved fire separation material between all units and repair areas of egress to u|| unita was substantially completed near the end of 2006 and based On this fact, 'the Petition tO1heSuprenneCourt ofBritish Columbia did not proceed. On June 20, 2807. District Safety and Fire Officers completed inspections in all of tile dwelling units on the property as a result nfsafety concerns expressed by the Maple Ridge Fire Department. A number of electrical and fire safety issues were identified including the removal of interconnected. GUl0ke detectors in a number of th8 units, electrical panel tampering, missing electrical outlet cover plates, (nSSCUre eiectri0a| r0onlS and improper use of extension cords between dwelling urifts. The owners of the units were ordered to retain the services of a licensed electrical contractor to address the deficiencies. Electrical repair permits were issued by the District to a licensed electrical contractor and inspections were performed toensure the works were completed. On December 11. 2007 an electrical safety inspection was completed at 11723 Fraser Street as e result of safety xunoorno expressed by the Maple Ridge Firm Department and it was noted by electrical safety officers that the hydro meters servicing the units had been tampered with. The electrical supply tothe building was ordered disconnected and the owner of the building was advised to retain the services Of 8 licensed e|eCthC8| contractor to address the deficiencies. Electrical repair permits were issued by the District to a licensed electrical contractor and inspections were performed toensure the works were completed prior tothe reconnection ofthe electrical service 0othe building. On Rsbujary 12. 2008, the court appointed Mr. Steve Creighton as the administrator of the strata corporation NN8to exercise "all of the powers and duties ofCuunci|^.The Director of Business Licenses, Permits and Bylaws contacted k1/. Creighton in February of2D08. The Director invited K8r. Creighton meet with him to discuss how the District might work with Mr. Creighton tDaddress the problems OnNorthumberland Court. Mr. Creighton declined the meeting but did correspond with the Director and among other issues indicated to the Director that it was his responsibility to respond to any orders issued by the District of K4ap|o Ridge. He went on to explain that grounds cleanup and repairs and maintenance, would be completed as funds allowed and that General Meeting of the strata owners vvou|U be held to vote on a new budget and quite likely one or more special assessments to pay for required work nDthe complex, |tiothe Districts' understanding that the general meeting 3fthe strata owners has not taken place todate. In July of 2008, an order to clean up the property including the discarded materials stored in the backyards of, the units was issued to the strata cJrpO[aUOA through K4r' Crnighton, the strata lot Owners and the tenants pUrSU8Ut to the District of K4@p|e Ridge Untidy and Unsightly Promises Bv\Ovv. Unf0rtUn8t8|y, the works were not, completed by the strata and the District of Maple Ridge completed the property clean up on August 25 and August 29, 200& The costs for the cleanup were forwarded tuthe strata corporation. On December 9, 2008, an order was issued tothe strata corporation through Mr. Creighton by the Maple Ridge Fire Department to complete repairs to a number of outside railings and etains, ensure unit numbers were clearly displayed on outside entry doors to all units, maintain clear yard auvema to all second story windows to o||ovv fire department ladders access tosecond story windows in case of emergency. remove all debris and storage within 10 fest of the rear exterior wall of Unit #8 and maintain this area clear at all times, remove 220 volt wiring leading out the window to the rear yard of Unit #8 and ensure the crawl space tOUnit #7isnot occupied and remove the accumulation Ufwood from the space. OnJanuary B' 2809. o Fire Department inspection revealed that none of the vvorhs ordered had been completed and a second letter and order were issued tothe strate corporation through Mr. Creighton. The works in the order have been started but have not been cornpleted to date. in February Of 2009' Council directed staff to perform inspections and gather information and evidence for Council to consider enforcing its bylaws and exercising its powers against the owners of 11701' 11709' 11715 and 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BCasa result of cornplaints arid concerns received about the safety and condition of the buildings. During the week of, February 10. 2009. District Of K40p|e Ridge Building, Electrical, Gas and Fire 8afetyOfficers completed interior and exterior inspections of all dwelling units located at 11701. 11709. 111715 and 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge' BCwith the exception of Unit 19 - 11715 Fraser Street, K4a0io Ridge, BC. A:m*ns was not available to Unit 19 during the inspections and the owner was out of the country and riot available to provide entry during the inspections. it appeansthat Unit 19 is not occupied arid err8ngementSvvi|i be made to inspect the unit when the owner isavailable. Reports from the Manager of Inspections and the Fire Chief are appended to this report and identify number offire and safety regulation violations evident in both the interiors and exteriors ofthe dwelling units. Since January Of2OO9. over 35 e-nails have been necoivedfrVm neSNeDt3 requesting, in part, that Council respect a residents right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact and enforce nuisance bylaws onany individual orcompany who habitually puts the community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. b) Desired Outcome(s) Safety and Bylaw Officers from the District of Maple Ridge havereceived complaints about the condition ofthe buildings and property over the past three years and have issued a series of orders to the owners and strata council to address safety concerns and the unsightly nature Of the property. Although repairs and clean ups have eventually been completed, the property continues todeteriorate and subsequent inspections have revealed escalated interior and exterior gafetyoonoorms in many nfthe occupied units and common property areas, Staff is requesting that Council consider the following enforcement options including the suggested resolutions: OPTION 1: Remedial Action Powers Pursuant to s. 73(l)(a) of the Community Charter, Council may impose e remedial action requirementinreSpentnf-abui|dingo[otherstruotun*.anerentunofanykind.orasinoi|ar matter or1hing^ Pursuant to s. 73, Council may only impose the remedial action requirement |fCouncil considers that the building isinorcreates an unsafe condition, Orcontravenes the Provincial building regulations orthe District ofMaple Ridge Building Bylaw. Pursuant to s. 74, Council may declare that the building is a nuisance and impose a remedial action requirement in relation to the nuisance. Sectiun 74(1) also applies in relation to a thing that 'council considers to be so dilapidated or unclean as to be offensive to the oommunity''. Pursuant to section 72(2)(b) the remedial action requirement may require the om/oar or lessee of the building and the owner and occupier of the land on which the building is located to undertake the following measures with respect to the building: 1. Remove o[demolish it, U. Fill itin, cover itover oralter it, 0. Bring ituptothe standard specified bybylaw, or |v. Otherwise deal with it in accordance with the directions of council or a person authorized bycouncil. Buildo7gBylaw and Building Code The manager of |nSpeCUOnS has determined that conditions present, in many of the dwelling units and omnnnnon property areas contravene safety standards identified in the Districts' Building Bylaw, the BC Building Code' the Canadian Electrical Code Pert 1. 2006 and the B-149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code. Seodon2O1ofthe District's Building Bylaw requires all construction and repair tudano aged areas of a building oomplywith the current BC Building Code, BillGasSafety Cude, Canadian Electrical Code, the District's bylaws and any ather appiicable onactments respeatingsafeLy, Section 882 of the Local GOverOmen1 Act provides that the building code has the same force and effect as e validly enacted hy)ae/ of the District. Fire Byfaw'and Fire Code The Fire Chief has determined that conditions present in (nanyOfthe dwelling units and Common property areas contravene -'th8BCFire Code. Section 5 of the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111'1988 provides that the National Fire Code of Canada, 1985. as revised is adopted as regulations for the District supplementary to regulations nncade pursuant to the bylaw. BC Re& 175/2008 provides that the National Fire Code of Canada 2005 is adopted as the BC Fire Code with certain amendments. U'nsafeCondition ofthe Buildings Both the Manager of Inspections and the Fine Chief are of the opinion that the buildings and common a,--eas are in an unsafe condition due to contravening the District byla-ws and Provincial Fire and Building regulations. Nuisance Several reSdenLshave COnn[lDinedabout the condition 0fthe buildings and common property areas creating anuisance and putting the community atrisk. Remedial Action Requirement Punsu@nttoitsremed|a|aotionpovvensunde/theComnnun|tyCharter.ifCounoi|considensthestnota lots and/lor the common. property (collectively, the building) to be in a hazardous condition and/or to be 8 nuisance it could reVuirethatthe a building or buildings be brought up to a standard specified bv1he District's bylaws and the Provincial building and fire regulations. Should Council choose to impose a remedial action requirement to have the buildings be brought up to a standard specified by the D|atriot'a bylaws and the P[OviDCiat building and fire regulations, the remedial action requirement may include @ requirement for the owners and the strata corporation to agree with the Manager Of Inspections on a aCheUu|oU p|8n by @ certain date setting out the dates when certain works will be completed. If the owners and the strata corporation fail to comply with the remedial action, requirement including failing tu agree to a schedule or adhering to any dates in the schedule, the District of k0ap|8 Ridge could then choose to undertake the work itself. The advantage of Council proceeding with a rernedia| action requirement isthat ifthe owners and strata corporation tail to comply with the remedial action requirement, the District may exercise its powers unUera, 17 of the Community Charter and carry out the remedial action requirement at the expense of the owners and Strata Corporation. The District may recover the costs it incurs in the same manner as property taxes provided the appropriate procedures are fol.owed. Council should be aware, however, tho1any owner or the strata coFporaTon could challenge the remedial action requirement in the cuurL It is unknown h0* OOuCh time vvDu|d be required h]r the court torule nntile remedial action requirement. Enforcement Option � Should Council choose to impose a remedial action requirement to have any ofthe strata lots and/ or the common property to be brought up to a standard specified by the District's bylaws and Provincial building and fire regulations, 1ha suggested wording ofthe reno|od0VS are attached as OPTION 2.: Court Proceedini�s Pursuant to s. 274 of the Community Charter, the District may commence injunction proceedings in the B.C. Supreme Court against the strata corporation and the owners to enfonoe, or prevent or restra'n the contravention of the Distriffs bylaws and the provisions of the Community CharLer and the Local Government Act. The District oou|d seek an order from the court to prevent the strata corporation and the owners from continuing to breach the District's bylaws including the District's Building Bylaw Nn.0180-20O3.the B.C.Building Code (pursuant toe.682ufthe Local Government Act). and the District's Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111 - 1988 and to bring Units 5' O. 7 and 8. 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC; Units A. 10, 11 and 12 11709 Fraser Street, K8ap|c Ridge, BC�Units 13,14.15and 18117O1Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BCand Units 17':18.and 2O11715 Fraser* Street, Maple Ridge, BC into compliance with the District's bylaws. If the strata corpora -Lion and the owners, fail t0bring the buildings into compliance with the District's bylaws, the District could seek an order from the court to have the District bring the building,., into compliance with the District's bvlaws at the expense of the strata corporation and 'the owners. The advantage ofthin option is that if the District is successful it would have an enforoeab|o order from the court. The disadvantage is that it vvnu|d take a considerable amount of time and can be quite costly. Enforcement Option 2� Should, Council choose to commence injunction proceedings in the B.C, Supreme Court against any of the owners of the strata |OtS and/or the common property to 8Dh}FCa, or prevent or restrain the onn�mvention of the District's bylaws and the provisions of the Community Cherer and the Louml Government Act the following wording iasuggested: That the District of Maple Ridge authorize its solicitors, Young. Anderson to uomnDanCe injunction proceedings in the B.C. Supreme Court to enforce the District's Building Bylaw No. 6180 - 2003. the B.C. Building Code (pursuant to a. 692 of the Local Government Act), the District's Fire Prevention Bylaw No, 4111 - 1988, and any other bylaws the Distrio1`a solicitors consider necessary against: 1. ]agodev Singh A1Hwa|, the owner of ten strata lots known as Units #5. #G, #7 arid #8' 11723- Fraser Street. Maple Ridge, BC UOit#1O, 11700Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC Units#18, #14and #16. 11701 Fraser Street, K4@p|e Ridge; UO83#17 and #18 11715 ~ Strata Lot 5of District Lot998 Group INew Westi-ninsterDistrictStrata PlanNW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown Ofform 1. - St/ate Lot 6 of District Lot 398 Group I New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot 8sshown ofform 1, - Strata Lot 7 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New VVoStrDin5te[ District. Strata Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot asshown ofform 1. - Strata Lot 8 of District Lot 398 Group New Westminster District Strata Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the sbratslot asshown ofform 1; - Strata Lot 10 District Loi3g8 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NVV8together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement nfthe strata lot ayshown ODfVr01| - Strata Lot 13 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Pion NVV8 together with an interest in the common property in prowrtion to the unit enotlement ofthe strata lot aashown ofform 1; - Strata Lot 14 of District Lot 39S Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NVV8tngether i proportion oto iten1iUementofthostrata vvithanint�rec�inthonornmuDpPope�� in unit lot nsshown ofform 1; - Strata Lot 16 of District Lnt398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the commor, property in proportion to the unit entitlenneIt. of the strata lot esshown Ofform 1; - Strata Lot 17 District Lot3Q8 Group 1 New Westminster District Dian NVY8tVgether with on interest in the common property in proportion to 1he unit entitlement of the strata |ot asshown Vnform 1: - Strata Lot 18 of District Lot3Q8 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion tothe unit entitlement of the strata lot asshown ofform 1: 2. Michael John Kwosnica, the registered mmnernftwo strata lots known as Units #Q and #11' 11709 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC and legally described as: Strata Lot 9 of District Lot 398Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NWG togeld er with an interest in the cornrr)on property in. proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form I; Strata Lot 11 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NYV8together vvitn an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of t,-,.e strata lot @Gshown nffornl 1| 3, Regina Luisa Uenkzovh, 'the registered owner of o strata lot known as Unit#12' 11709 Fraser SLnyei Maple Ridge, BC and legally described as Strata Lot 12 of District Lot 398 Group I New Westminster District Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the common property in proporli0niDthe unit entitlement ofthe strata lot aSshown OYfOnn 1; 4. Sean Douglas Myers, the registered owner of strata lot known as UDit#15, 11701 Fraser Street. Maple Ridge, BC and legally described as Strata Lot 15 of District Lot 398 Group 1 Now Westminster District Plan N$V8 together with an intarest in the common property in proportion totheunit entitlement ofthe strata lot esshownofform 1; 5. Mary Ann Rose Jones, the registered Ovvnor of 8 strata lot known as Unit#20` 'i 17', 5 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC. and legally described as Strata Lmt20 of District Lnt398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion t0the unit entitlement ofthe strata lot as shown ofform 1; and O� ]@gdevS|ngh /thvva|. Sonia Athvvai Mary Ann Rose Jones, Michael John Rwa8niC@, Sean D--'g|@s Myers and Regina Luioe DcnobzaCh, the owners of the common property of the above noted strata lots astenants incommon in proportion tothe unit ertit\ementofeach of their strata lots as shown on forrn 1 filed with Strata Plan N8V-8 ("The 0vvnara, Strata Plan NW-8); and to make such incidental filings and decisions as necessw y to undertake such proceedings. b)BusiAess Plan/FiAancia||nAo|icaUono: Council should b8aware that any remedial action requirements issued byCouncil may b8challenged by the owners and the strata corporation in Supreme Court, Any court proceedings will require substantial legal resources and will take a considerable amount of time before arguments are heard bythe court. c) Alternatives'. Staff CONCLUSIONS, The buildings are a safety concern, do not conform to the District's Building or Fire Bylaw and have become a nuisance to the community. Staff recommends that immediate enforcement actions be connmenced to compel the owner and the common property owners to remediate the. buildings. Z Prepared try: Brock McDonald Director,of lAaenses, Permits and Bylaws AP roved neral Manager of Public's o—*s and Development Services Concurrence: J.L. (jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: Appendix A - tyj@jj-,)gcr of inspection services Repoit Apoendi;� B - Fire Chief Report e:' .4rA 1- iVC, k v-(' Fo Appendix C - Citizens Complaints Ape radix D - Remedial Action Requirements Resolutions Appendix A (March 9, 2009) ^''`^^^o'''`,~" MAPLERIDGE Memorandum TO� BROCK MCDONAU} FROM: STEPHEN J. COTE-ROLVINK, MANAGER OF INSPECTION SERVICES SUBJECT: 117O1.l17Og.11715&11723FRASERSTREET (N0RTMUK8BERLANDCOURT) DATE: 16FEBRUARY2008 All items below are itemized by unit number. All Items affecting common property are separated from those relating to the interior of the units. For each unit, deficiencies found based on health and safety concerns are listed in the first part and the relevant Code references are in the second part. Reports onthe inspection results homthe Plumbing Inspector/Gas Safety Officer and the Electrical Safety Officer a,re attached to this report as Appendix I and Appendix 11. Asafety inspection was completed onUnits 5'ZO.117U1/117Dg/11715'/11723Fraser Street 8xc|uding the interior 8funit 18(access was not available) during the week VfFebruary 10thtV12m2009. These inspections were conducted after written notification was providedto the owners and delivered to each of the units. Further, verbal approval was requested upon arrival at every unit frorn the person bein� identified aethe/or atenant ofthat unit which was subsequently granted. Upon review Ofthe both the exterior and interior 0fthe buildings and units it was evident that the buildings have deteriorated or been modified to the point where they no longer achieved code requirements. These findings are only in those areas of primary code concern being safety, health and fire protection of buildings and facilities as identified in the introduction to the 8C Building Code pagex(|i� The C0dS defines its Safety, Health and Fire Protection r8Qui[8rDeRtS in objective statements (OS) which are located inDiviaionA- Part 2,Section 22^ObjmStiv8s^ Ofthe 2UO6 B.C. Building Code with the statements applicable to above referenced pnamiseo being: 0S Sefe1y, OS1 Fire Safety, OS1.4 - fine safety system s failing tofunction anexpected, OS1.5;OS2Structural Safety, OS2.3'OSZ5;O33Safety inUse, OS3'1, OS3.3' OS3,8, 0S3'7; OH Health, 0HI Indoor Conditions, 0H1.1. OW'2 - inadequatatherrna| CDOnfn¢ OH13; OH2 S8Aib3tiQn, OH2.1, 0H2.5 - contact with vermin and insects: UP fire and Structural Protection of Bui ldings,OPI Fire Protection of the Building, OP1.4 - -fire safety systems failing to function as expected; OP2 Structural Sufficiency ofthe Building, OP2.3; OPS Protection of the Building or Facility from Water and Sewage Damage. A complete list of the referenced statements is appended to the end of this docurnent. These findings do not deal with the broader topics of aesthetic or cosmetic irregularides within the buildings nronthe bu||dingS9x1ehorw/hiohareoftenmoreeAponentbu1nVtreQu|aTedvvkh1nthonnandetesofoodeo. These findings also do not deal with current Building Code requirements where there Is no issue in respect ofthe health orsafetyofthe building. Objective Statements are found in Division Aufthe 8.C. Building code 2006. Any other references tp sections in this rePort are to Division B of the B.C. Building Code unless otherwise stated. Common PropeM Unit (Pictures 7. 10' 11. 14. 16. 17, 18` 19' 20. 30, 31, 32' 33) • Building perimeter at grade line is rotting out due to height of bankfiU and constructed walkways. w Bedroorn windows are not all functioning or able to meet egress requirements. • Fire separation in crawl space is not complete to unit S. Due to the amount of material stored in crawl space was unable to see crawl space fire separation to unit 8. a Standing water in crawl space. 4% Mould on drywall in crawl space. 6 Heating system supply piping is degraded to the point of not being functional Interior Spjre Unit 'Pictures 1, 2, 7,8. 11, 13, 14, 15, 21, 27, 28. 29.34) 8 Interconnected 110 volt smo[,,,e alarms have all been removed p Furnace is not in working condition and ductIng is corroded to the point of no longer being able to pet -form its intended funcUon. * Inteffritv of kitchen floor is in question as it is soongy to walk on due to continual leaking of the kitchen sink w Hand/guard rail for stairs has been modified and does not noe*t.code. w Storage has been placed over stairs which is supported byguard rail and restricts headroom clearance. • Standing water in crawl space creating health issues as well as saturating drywali in fire separation. Drainage provided incrawl spaces must bekept clear otall times. Also, storage isnot tobeplaced inthe crawl space suastoprevent orinhibit drainage. The following is a break down of sections from the B�Building Code that are not being met, These items consider to be of health and life safety concerns in accordance with the objectives of the B.0 Building Code and would require upgrading to be in compliance with the B.C. Building Code. Due t0water ingress into the building ntthe exterior grade line the structural integrity cfthe building and its structural components are deteriorating tothe point where repairs must Ue performed 10prevent collapse nf the building and harm tothe buildings occupants: • Objective stmtementOS2.3 - Damage toordeterioration tfbuilding elements. ° Sentences 9.3.2.0.(3)ond Clause (o) structural elements to be treated with a preservative when clearance tUfinished ground isless the 15Ornm. • Article 9.12.3.2, Grading of Backfill - required to prevent drainage towards the foundation * Objective Statement DH1.1-inadequate indoor air quality ° ObJectiveStatement OHl.3-contact with moisture • Section 9.13. DannAp/oofog, Waterproofing and Soil Gas Control • Subsection 9.18.5, Dnainege, which deals with collection -and removal water from these spaces. * Subsection 926.4'Flashing at|nten5eCU0n8 o Sentence 9.26.41(2) - deals with platforms that effectively act as roofs for the accumulation or drainage of precipitation which is the case with the raised wooden walkways and concrete side walks. Bedroom windows in the unit do not complying with the nequingrD8Ot5 in Article 9I1.2. ^BeU(oo0 Windows' for egress in cases of emergency and are required. to be repaired or replaced. The guard/handrails do not comply with Section 8.Bofthe BCBuilding Code and are required tobe repaired to meet the following code requirements. « Section 9.8. Stairs, R80pa' Handrails arid Guards o Subsection 9.0.7'Handrails a Art|u|as 9,87.1, .2-' .4, .5, .0. & 7. - These articles cea\ with Required Handrails, Continuity of Handrails, Height o[Handrails, Ergonomic Design, Projections into Stairs and Ramps 8L Design and Attachment of Handrails respectively. None Ofthese areas are met inthe current buildings. o Subaeotiong.B.8.Gua/de = Articles 9.8.81. .2', .3,. .5. Q .6. - These Articles deal with Required Guards, Loads on Guards, Height of Guordo. Openings in Guards and Design to prevent Climbing. None ofthese items are met within this building. The required fire separation between adUaoentunha has been clammged or not completed. Thome walls will naquinarepair tothe following criteria: � Subsection 9.10.9. Fire Separations between Rooms and Spaces within Buildings o Article Q.1O.8.2.Continuous Barrier - continuity cf fire separations,. o Sentence 9.10.9.14.(3) Separation of Residential Suites - requires the fire aepanstiuntohave a1.0hour fire resistance rating. The building is lacking fina and carbon monoxide detection systems required for basic life safety notification and require the reinstallation of smoke 8|anns and C8rbOO monoxide detectors that comply with the following criteria: • Subsection 9.1O,1g.Smoke Alarms • Articles 9.10.191. .2, .3, .4. & .5. Deal with Required Smoke Alarms, Location of Smoke Alarms, Power Supply, Interconnection of Smoke A|enns and Instructions for Maintenance and Care respectively. • Article 9.32'4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms. The buildings readng system has degraded or been modified to the point that repair end replacement isrequired eatothe following sections: • Objective Statement 0H1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality a Section 9.32, Ventilation o Subsection S32'4.Additional RmquirernentaAgainst DepneSsurbaUon a Article 9.32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms applies to this building. ° Section 8.3[3,Heating and Air-conditioning o Subsections 9.33.1, .2, .3, .5, .G. and .10, Required Heating SyStems' Design Tempera.tures' General Requirements for Heating and Air-conditioning Systems, Heating and Air-conditioning Appliances, Air Duct Systems and chimneys and Venting Equipment respectively apply h]this building. Common Prooe * Building perimeter ntgrade line is rot ingoutdoeto height of backf U and constructed wa|kwaya' • Bedroom vvindowaare not @Ufuocbon|ngnrable tomeet egress requirements. * Fire separation incrawl space ianot complete tounit 5. • Standing water in on8w| space. • Mould ondrywall incrawl space. * Heating system supply piping isdegraded tothe point ofnot being functional. • Wood structure |orotting above founnbonline incrawl space. • Water isflowing into crawl space from exterior, = Rotting building structure due towood/grade interface. Interior S12ace Unt6 (Pic1uree."Qlru23,28`32.33) « Standing water in crawl space creating health issues as well as saturating drywall in fire separation. Drainage provided in crawl spaces must bokept clear atall times. Alao,atomage is not tobe placed 1nthe crawl space soau.oprevent nrinhibit drainage. 0 Window pane missing inone ofthe upstairs windows (northside) 0 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms have been removed upstairs and downstairs * Furnace not working and ducts corroded and not functional. * D,YwaUhas been cut out above ohowerremoving a portion ofthe fire separation tOunit 5. 0 New access cut into floor at bottorn of -stairs with temp bracing only for cutjoist. The following ks abreak down ofsections fnornthe BI.Bu|k1ing Code that are not being met. These items consider to be of health and life safety concerns in accordance with the objectives of the B.0 Building'Gode and vxou|d require upgrading to be in compliance with the B.C. Building Code. Due towater ingress into the building Gtthe exterior grade line the structural integrity ofthe building and its structural components are deteriorating to the point where repairs must be performed to prevent collapse of the building and harm tothe buildings occupants: ° Objective statement DS2.3 - Damage to or deterioration of building elements. • Sentences 9.3.2.9,(3)and Clause (a) structural elements to be treated with a preservative when clearance tOfinished ground isless the 150rnm. • Article 9.12.3.2.Grading ofBockfi|| - required toprevent drainage towards the foundation • Objective Statement OH1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality • Objective Statement OH1.3-contact with moisture m Section @.13.Damp0rnofng,Waterproofing and Soil Gas Control w Subsection 9.18.5. Dnainage, which deals with uVUoodon and removal water 'from these spaces. * Subsection 0926.4.Flashing at intersections o Sentenceg.264.1/2) - deals with platforms that effectively act aa roofs for the accumulation or drainage of precipitation which iothe case with the naisied wooden ,,,-valkways and concrete side walks. Bedroom windows in the unit do not complying with the requirements in A/UC|e 9.7.1.2. "Bedroom Windows" for egress in cases of emergency and are required to be repaired or replaced. The required fire separation between units 5. 6 & 7 has been damaged or not completed. These walls will require repair tothe following criteria: � Subsection 9.10.9. Fire Separations between Roonis and Spaces within Buildings o Article S.10.9.2.Continuous Barrier - continuity offire separGUoOS,. o Sentence 8.10.9.14.(3) Separation Of Residential Suites - requires the fire separation to have 1.0 hour fire resistance rating. The building is kookin8ffra and carbon monoxide detection nyaternn required for basic life safety notification and require the reinstallation of smoke ai0nnS and carbon monoxide detectors that comply with the following criteria: * Subsection g.10.1g.Smoke Alarms ~ Articles 9.10.19.1, .2.. .3.. .4. & .5. Dao| with Required Smoke Alarms, Location of Smoke A|anna. Power Supply, Interconnection of Smoke Alarms and Instructions for, Maintenance and Care respectively. m Article 9.32,4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms. The buildings heating system has degraded or been modified to the point that repair and replacement inrequired astuthe following, sections: • Objective Statement OH1.1-|nadequeteindoor air quality ~ Objective Statement 0H1.2 - |nadequatetherm8| comfort • Section y32.Ventilation u Subsection 8.32.4'Additional Requirements Against Depressurization u Article 9.32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms applies tothis building. • SeC1|OD9.33.Heating and Air-conditioning o Subsections 9.33.1., .2., .3.' .5.. .G. and .10. Required Heating Systams, Design Temperaturen, General Requirements for Heating and Air-conditioning Systems, Heating and Air-conditioning Appliances, Air Duct Systems and chimneys and Venting Equipmentrespectively apply 8»dh|S building. Common Prope Unit 7 (Pic-ures �L 3. 7'12) * Building perimeter at grade line is rotting out due to height of backfill and constructed walkways. * Bedruomwindows are broken and taped shut. * Fire separation in crawl space is not complete to unit 6. and has been damaged due to finishing of crawl space. * Unable tgsee standing water incrawl space a3false floor has been constructed over, Tenant indicated floor was installed due UDwater. • Crawl space has been converted to work. room and has ceiling and walls coml)[etely finished therefore unable tosee building structure to determine. damage. * Access Locrawl space does not comply with code for egress reVuirements. Hand and guard rails kz stairs leading tOcrawl space are missing. Also, no guard rails exist around opening beside deck into crawl space. Interior Space Unit <Picturea7 10.14-20.24A • Hole in drywall exposing floorjoist in northwest corner of hving room compromises fire separation to uDit8. • Bottom of floorjoist notched in same area causing floorjoist to be over spanned and potential failure. • Insufficient headroom in crawl space to be used as basemenrt thus use does not comply with building code. ° Interconnected 111Dvolt smoke alarms have all been removed w Bedroom windows have been modified 1uremove operable portion ofhave been tapped shut therefore no longer meeting egress requirements, The following is a break down of sections from the B.C. Building Code that are not being met. These i-,enns| consider to be of health and life safety concerns in accordance with the objectives of the B.0 Building Code and would require upgrading to be incompliance with the B.C. Building Code. Due to water ingress into the building at the exterior grade line the structural integrity of the building and its structural oorn0onentoare deteriorating tothe point where repairs must be performed t0prevent collapse cf the building and harm to the buildings occupants: • Objective statement OS2.3 - Dannage to or deterioration of building elements. • Sentences 9.3.2.9.(3)and Clause (a) structural elements to be treated with a preservative when clearance tofinished ground ialess the 15Omm. • Article B.12.3.2.Grading VfB@Ckfi||-required toprevent drainage towards the foundation • Objective Statement 0H1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality • Objective Statement OH 1.3 - contact with moisture • Section 9.13.Qannpproofin§.Waterproofing and Soil Gas Control • Subsection 9.18.5. Drainage. which Uea|s with collection and removal water from these spaces. * Subsection 82O'4.Flashing at Intersections o Sentence 8.20.4.1.(2) - deals with p|atlorrns that effectively act an roofs for the accumulation ordrainage nf Precipitation which is the case with the raised wooden walkways and concrete side walks. Bedroom vv|ndows in the unit do not complying with the requirements in A�ide 9I1.2. "Bedroom Windows"fo( egress in cases of ernergency and are required to be repaired or replaced. The guard/handrails do not comply with Section 9.8 of the BC Building Code and are required to be m Section 9J3.Stains, Ramps, HanUnsUsand Guards o Subsection Q^B.7.Handrails ° Articles 9.8.71. .2, .4, '5, .6. & .7. - These articles deal with Required H@ndr@i|S, Continuity ofHandrails, Height ofHandrails, Ergonomic Design, Projections into Stairs and Rornpa & Design and Attachment of Handrails respectively. None ofthese areas are 0etinthe current building. u Subsection 0.8'8.Guards IN Artio|ea9.8.B.1, .2, .B, .5. & .G - These Articles deal with Required Guards, Loads on Guards, Height of Guards' Openings in GuenjS and Design to prevent Climbing. None ofthese items are met within this bui|d}ng. The required fire separation between adjacent units has been damaged. These walls will require repair tothe following criteria: � 3eoton 9.10. Fire Protection o Subsection 9.10.9. Fire Separations between Rooms and Spaces within Buildings � Article S'10.G2.Continuous Barrier - continuity offire aeparationa,. ° Sentence 9.10.9.14.(3)Seperation of Residential Suites - requires the fire separation tohave o11.0hour fire resistance rating. o Article 9.1O.8.9.deals with fire protection of crawl space. I'hecrawl space is being used as a work shop which does not meet code for use or design. � Subsection 9.5.3. Ceiling Heights Nt Required headroom and minimurn ceiling heights for safety and egress. The building is |a' inQfire and carbon monoxide detection Systoony required for basic life safety notification and require the reinstallation of smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors that comply with the following criteria: w Subsection B.1O19'Smoke Alarms • Artic|es 9.10.191. .2, .3, '4. & '5. Deal with Required Smoke Alarms, Location of Smoke A|anna. Power Supply, Interconnection of Smoke Alarms and Instructions for Maintenance and Care respectively. ° Artic|e 8-32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms. Common Prope Unit (Pictures 9.10,16.21, 22.23.25) w Building perimeter at grade line is rotting out due to height of back -fill and constructed walkways. * Bedroom windows are not all functioning or able to meet egress requirements, * Water incrawl space. 0 Mould ondrywall incrawl space. a Heating.system and supply piping is degraded to the point of not being functional. Unit (Pic1uraa1_4`f, 10 19) * Evidence ofhabitation incrawl space. w Furnace not working and ducts corroded and not functional. * Stove situated within 18 inches under wooden cabinets with no protection or hood in place 0 inte.rconnected 110 volt smokp alarms have a, I been renir-wed • Hole in ceiling exposinglioorjoist northeast corner in I iving room and affecting, integrity of fire separation. * Fire separation damaged beside access tocrawl space. * Fire separation incrawl space appears tohave drywall |O1actbut penetrations are not fire stopped to code requirements. The following is a break down of sections from the B.C. Building Code that are not bein� met. These items | consider +0 be of health and life safety concerns in accordance with the objectives of the B.C' Building Code and vvou|U require upgrading to be in compliance with the B.C. Building Code. Due towater ingress into the building stthe exterior grade line thestnuotuns| integrity ofthe building and its structural components are deteriorating to the point where repairs must be performed to prevent collapse of the building and harm tothe buildings occupants: • Objective StatamentOS2.3 - Dam, age or deterioration of building elements. • Sentences 9.3.2.9.(3)and Clause (a) structural elements to be treated with a preservative when clearance tofinished ground is|essthe15Omm. * Article 9.12.3.2. Grading of Backfill - required. to prevent drainage towards the foundation • objective Statement OH 1.1 - Inadequate indoor air quality w Objective Statement 0H 1.3 - contact with moisture � Section 9.13. Dampprnof|ng, Waterproofing and Soil Gas Control * Subsection 9.18.5. Drainage, which Uee|a with collection and removal water from these spaces, w Subsection 9.26.4. Flashing at Intersections o Sentence 9.26.4.1.(2) - deals with platforms that effectively act as roofs for the accumulation or drainage of precipitation which is the case with the raised wooden walkways. and concrete side walks. Bedroom windows in the unit do not complying with the requirements in Article 9.712. "Bedroom Windows," for egress in cases of emergency and are required to be repaired or replaced. The guard/handrails do not comply with Section 9.8 of the BC Building Code and are required to be repaired tomeet the following code requirements. � Section 9'8.Stains. Ramps, Handrails and Guards o Subsection g'8'T.Handrails = Artidea8J971. & .7. -TheaoarUo|osdea|vvith Required Handrails, Continuity of Handrails, Height of Handrails, Ergonomic Design, Projections into Stairs and Ramps & Design and Attachment of Handrails respectively, None ofthese areas are met inthe current building. u Subsection 8.B'R.Guards m Articles 2.. .3.. 5. & .6. - These Articles deal with Required Guards, Looda on Guards, Height of Guards, Openings in Guards and Design to prevent Climbing. None ofthese items are me1within this building. The required fire separation between adjacent units has been damaged, These walls will require � Section g.10�Fire Protection o Subsection 9.10.9. Fire Separations between Roonns and Spaces within Buildings w Article S.1O.9.2.Continuous Barrier -continultyoffire se parations- Sentence 8.10.9.I4/3) Separation of Residential Suites - requires the fire separation tohave e1.Dhour fire resistance rating. o Article 9.10.8.9. deals with fire protection of crawl space. The crawl space is being used as living space which does not meet code for use or design. * Subsection 9.5.3. Ceiling Heights = Required headroom and minimum ceiling heights for safety and egress, The building is lacking fire and carbon monOxkce detection systems reqUired for basic life safety notification. The reinstallation of smoke e|anns and carbon monoxide detectors that comply with the following criteria must bedone: • Subsection Q.18.iQ.Smoke Alarms • Articles 8.1', 0.101. .2, .8, .4. & .5. Qeo| with Required SmokeA|arms. Location of Smoke Alarms, Power Supply, Interconnection of Smoke Alarms and instructions for Maintenance and Care yes;)eCUve|y. ' • Article 9.32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms. ° The required clearances to combustibles above the units stove is not being met and must be repaired: � Subsection S.1D22'Fire Protection for Gas, Propane and Electric Ranges o Articles 9.10.22.2. & .3. outline the requirements for the Vertical Clearances above Ranges and Protection around Ranges. The buildings heating system has degraded or been modified to the point that repair and replacement isrequired eotothe following sections: • Objec�iveStatement 0H1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality * Objective Statement 0H1.2-Inadequate thermal comfort ~ Section 832.Ventilation o Subsection 9.32.4.Additional Requi[enneDtsAgaiUoiDepressurization ° Article 932.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms applies tothis building. • section y.33'Heating and Air-conditioning o Subsections 9.33.1.' .2., '3.. .5.. .8. and .10. Required Heating Systems, Design Temperatures, General Requirements for Heating and Air-conditioning Systems, Heating and Air-conditioning Appliances, Air Duct Systems and chimneys and Venting Equipmnntrespectively apply tmthis building. 11709 Fraser Street Unit (Pictures 137.138.155.156.259.387'308) • Fire separation in nrawl space is not complete to unit 20. Due tothe amountof material stored in craw: space of unft 0 was unable to gaHr, physical access to crawl space of unit 9 to see crawl space fire separation tounit 1Oand unit 12. • Standing water incrawl space. • Heating system supply piping is degraded to the point of not being functional. Interior Spacg Unitg (Picture 130 * Ctearamce to combustibles over stove are not being met 750mm(29.15`)is required without protection • Furnace not working. • Interconnected 110volt smoke alarms have a||been removed osthere was previous issue offalse @|arnoa. The following ksabreak down ufsections from the Bl�Building Code that are not being met. These items | consider to be of health and life safety concerns in accordance with the objectives of the B.0 Building Code and would require upgrading tobeiDcompliance with the B.C. Building Code. Due towater ingress into the building a1the exterior grade line the structural integrity ofthe building and its structural components are deteriorating to the point where repairs must be performed to prevent collapse of the bui|d[mgandharm tuthe buildings occupants: • Objective statement OS2.3 - Damage tonrdeterioration of building elements. • Sentences 9.3.2.9.(3)and C|euuo (o) structural elements to be treated with a preservative when clearance tofinished ground isJess the 150nnnn. w Article 9.12.3.2, Grading of Backfill - required to prevent drainage towards the foundation • Objective Statement OH1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality • Objective Statement OH 1.3 - contact with moisture * Section 9.13. QampVroofing, Waterproofing and Soil Gas Control w Subsection 9.18.5. Drainage, which deals with collection and removal water from these aVeoes� • Subsection 9.26.4. Flashing at Intersections o Sentence 0.20.4.1.(2) - deals with platforms that effectively act as roofs for the accumulation or drainage of precipitation which is the case with the raised wooden walkways and concrete side walks. The required fire separation between adjacent units has been damaged or not completed. These w8Uswill require repair tothe following criteria* w Subsection 9.1-0.9. Fire Separations between Rooms and Spaces within Buildings o Article 9.1Q,8.2.Continuous Barrier - continuity offire separations,. o Sentence 910.9.14/8) Separation of Residential Suites - requires the fire separation tohave al.0hour fire resistance rat|ng. The building is lacking fire and carbon monoxide detection systems required for basic life safety notification. The reinstallation of smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors that comply with the following c/iteha,nnustbedone: 0 Subsection 9.1O.1B.Smoke Alarms * Ardclen 8.10.191. .2.' .3., /4. & .5. Deal with Required Srnoke Alarms, Location of Smoke Alarms, Power Supply, interconnection ofSmohe AJanns and |nstru�tiunofo/ Maintenance and Qans respectively, * ArLiC|e 9.32.4.2. Carbon K4VnDxideA|arnna. The required o|emnonoea to combustibles above the unit,; stove is not being met and must be ro!:)o|ned: * 8ubseoton 9.10.22. Fire Protection for Gas, Propane and Electric Ranges o Articles 9.10.22.2. & .3' outline the requirements for the Vertical Clearances above Ranges and Protection around Ranges. The buildings heating system has degraded or been modified to the point that nypoi/ and rep|ooerner,t isrequired aatothe following sections: • Objective Statement 0H1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality w Objective StetementOH1.2 - Inadequate thermal comfort • Section 8.32.Ventilation o Subsection g'324.Additional Requirements Against Depressurization � Article 19.32.4'2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms applies tnthis building' • 8ect|nn9'33.Heating and Air-conditioning n Subsections 9.33A.. .2.. .3_ .5.. .S. and .10. Required Heating Systems, Design Temperatures, General Requirements for Heating and Air-conditioning Syaterms, Heating and Air-conditioning Appliances, Air Duct Systems and chimneys and Venting Equipment respectively apply t0this building. Unit 10(Pictores 13l-��1, 36.154, 157.i6O,111 6�165'166) • Building perimeter at grade line is rotting out due to height of hackfiU and constructed walkways. • Bedroom windows are not all functioning Urable k)meet egress requirements. • Guard/handrails required for exterior stair access into crawl space. • Fire separation incrawl space isnot. complete tounits Aand 11. • Standing water incrawl space. • M0u(cODdrywall incrawl space. • Heating system supply piping isdegraded tqthe point Ofnot being functional. • Exterior window broken and not sealed t0 prevent water ingress. Interior SNce Unit '10 (Pinturcs:14T, 154,158) • Furnace not working • Clearance tocombustibles over stove are not being met 750nnm(20.5~)iarequired without protection • Interconnected 110volt smoke alarms have all been removed • Hole iOsouth west corner ofliving roomcoiling affects integrity Offire separation. 'rhe 4oUOwirgis abreak down of sections from the B�Building Code that are not being met. These iterns| consider to be of health and life safety concerns in accordance with the objectives of the B.0 Butilding Code and would require upgrading to be in compliance with the B.C. Building Code, Due t0water ingress into the building Btthe exterior grade |inathestruCtu[@|integrity ofthe building and its structural components are deteriorating to the point where repairs must beperformed topmventcollapse of the buildigg and hannto the buildings occupants: • Objective statementOS2.3 - Damage to nrdet*horuGon of building elements. • Sentences 9.32.9.(3)end Clause (m) structural elements to be treated with a preservative when clearance tOfinished ground iSless the 150mm. • Article 9.12.3.2. Grading of BaCkf|| - required to prevent drainage towards the foundation • Objective Statement QH1.1-Inadequate indoorair quality ° Objective Statement OH 1.3 - contact with moisture « Section 9.13. Dannpproofing.Waterproofing and Soil Gas Control • Subsection 0.18.5. Drainage, which deals with collection and rennOvGl water from these spaces, • Subsection 0.26.4. Flashing at Intersections o Sentence 8.20.4.1.(2) - deals with p!at�orms that effectively act as roofs for the accumulation ordrainage of precipitation vvk|oh |sthe case with the raised wooden walkways and concrete side walks. Exterior bedroom windows in the unit do not complying with the requirements inArticle 8I12 "Bedroom Windows" for egress in cases of emergency and are required to be repaired or replaced. The guard/handrails do not comply with Section 9.8 of the BC Building Code and are required to be repaired to meet the following COd8 requirements. w Section Q.8.Stairs, Ramps, Handrails and Guards o Subsection g.&7.Handrails = Articles 9.8.7.1, .2, .4., Z., .O. & .7. - These articles deal with Required H@ndrai|S, Continuity of HBnU[@i|S` Height Of Handrei|S, Ergonomic Design, Projections into Stains and Ramps & Design and Attachment of Handrails respectively. None ofthese areas are met inthe current Uui|ding. o Subsection S.8.8.Guards = Articles 9.8.8.1, �2, .3., .5. &.6. - These Articles deal with Required Guards, Loads OD Gu@rdS, HSignit of Guards, Openings in Guards ODU Design to prevent Climbing. None 0fthese items are met within this building, The required fire separation between adjacent units has been damaged or not completed. These walls wiU require repair tothe following criteria: * Subsection 9.10.9. Fire Separations between Rooms and Spares within Buildings o Article g.10.9.2.Continuous Barrier - continuity offire aeparotons, o Sentence 9.10.9.14i3) Separation of Residential Suites - requires the fire separation tohave o1.0hour fire resistance rating. The building is lacking fire and C8rbOD monoxide detection systems required for basic life safety notification. The rS|OStBU@tiDD of smoke a|0rrOS and CGd]0n monoxide detectors that comply with the following criteria must bedmne:' ° Subsection 8.1O.19.Smoke Alarms * Articles 9.10.19.1.. �2., .3.' .4. & '5. Deal with Rocluired Smoke Alarms, Location of Smoke Alarms, Power Supply, Interconnection of Smoke Alarms and Instructions for Maintenance and Cane respectively. * ArtiC|eO.32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms. The required clearances to combustibles above the units stove is not bong met and must be repaired: � Subsection S.1Q�2.Fire Protection for Gas, Propane and Electric Ranges o Articles 9.10.22.2. & .3. outline the requirements for the VmMioa| Clearances above Ranges and Protection around Ranges. The buildings heating system has degraded or been modified to the point 1hat repair nnd replacement k;required astothe following sections: * Oojen-dvnStatement QH1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality ° ObiecciveS1atennentOH1.2-Inadequate thermal oomfo� � SaobonQ.32.Vend|ot\nn o Subsection 9.32.4. Additional Requirements Against Depressurization N Article 9.32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms app!iostothis building. * Section Q.33.Heating and Air-conditioning o Subsections 9.33.1.. .2.. 3.' .5.. .S. and .10' Required Heating Syotamo, Design Temperatures, General Requirements for Heating and Air-conditioning Systems, Heating and Air-conditioning Appliances, Air Duct Systems and chimneys and Venting Equipment respectively apply tmtnis building. Common ProgeLty Unit 11 (Pictures 244 - 255) w Fire separation incrawl space isnot complete tounit 1Oand 12. • Standing water in crawl space. • Mould undrywall incrawl space. * Heating syo1emsupply piping ksdegraded tothe point ofnot being functional • Guard/handrails required for exterior stair access into crawl space. Interior Spac Unit 11(Picture 143) • Clearance hocombustibles over stove are not being met 758mm(2g.G^)iorequired without protection • Interconnected 110volt smoke alarms have been removed from main floor • Standing water in crawl space creating health issues as well as saturating drywall 'n fire separation. Drainage provided |ncrawl spaces must bekept clear atall times- Also, storage isnot tmbeplaced in the orevv| space so auto prevent or inhibit drainage. The following is a break down of sections from the B.C.Building Code that are not being met. These iterns| consider toheofhealth and life safety concerns inaccordance with the objectives ofthe B.OBui|dim5Code and would require upgrading to be in compliance with the B.C. Buiiding Code. Due to water ingress into the building ztthe exterior grader line the structural inLrgrityofthe building and its struci ural components are deteriorating to the point where repairs must be performed to prevent collapse of the building and harm tothe buildings occupants: • Objective St@t8rOontO32.3 - Damage to or deterioration of building e|e0eDtS. • Sentences 9.3.2.9.(3)@nd Clause (e) structural elements to be treated with a preservative when clearance tnfinished ground isless -the 15Onlnn. • Article 9.12'3.2. Grading of Backfi|| - required to prevent drainage towards the foundation • ObjectivaStatement OH1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality • Objective Statement OH 1.3 - contact with moisture • Section 9.13. Demppn)ofing, Waterproofing and Soil Gas Control w Subsection 9.18.5. Drainage, which deals with collection and removal water from these spaces. • Subsection 8.28.4. Flashing at Intersections o Sentence 9.26.4.1.(2) - deals with platforms that effectively @C1 as roofs for the accumulation or drainage of precipitation which is the case with the raised wooden walkways and concrete side walks. Currently the unit is missing guard/hemdnaibstuthe exterior crawl space access stairs and deck opening. Guard./handrails are required and must comply with S8Ch0n 9/5 of the 8C Building Coda or are completely missing. The requirements in the following sections would need to be met: � Section 9J9.Stairs, Ramps, Handrails and Guards o Subsection 9.QIHandrails " Articles 9.8.7.1., .2, .4.. .5., .0. & .7. - These articles deal with Required Handrails, Continuity of HandGxi|n. Height of HondraHa, Ergonomic Design, Projections into Stairs and Ramps & Design and Attachment of Handrails respectively, None ofthese areas are met inthe current building. o Subsection S.8.B.Guards m Articles .2, 3, .5.& .O. - These Articles deal with Required "Guards, Loads on Guardo. Height of Guards, Openings in Guards and Design to �r�veDtC|i0bin�. NOA�Vf�h��itoms�r� rne�wi1hinth|s building. The required fine separation between adjacent units has been damaged or not completed (in the crawl space). These wa|ksvviUrequire repair and completion tothe hd|owing criteria: w Section 9.1O.Fire Protection o Subsection 9.10.9. Fire Separations between Rooms and Spaces within Buildings ° Article 9.10.9.2.Continuous Barrier - continuity 0ffire separationo,. " Sentence Q.10.9.14.(3) Separation of Residential Suites - requires the fire The building is lacking fire and carbon monoxide detection systems required for bash: life safety notification. The reinstallation of smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors that comply with the following criteria must bedone: • Subsection 9.1O.1g.Smoke AJmnns • Articles 9.10.19.1., 2.. 3.. .4, & 5' Deal with Required SmokeA|arms. Location of Smoke Alarms, Power Supply, |ntenoonnention of Smoke Alarms and Instructions for Maintenance and Care respectively, * Article 0.32.4.2. Carbon K4onoxidaA|armo. The required clearances to combustibles above the units stove is not being met and must be repaired: � Subsection 9.1D.22.Fire Protection for Gas, Propane and Electric Ranges o Articles 9.10.22.2. & 3, outline the requirements for the Vertical Clearances above Ranges and Protection around Ranges, The buildings heating system has degraded or been modified to the point that repair and replacement karequired aotothe foUowingsections: • Objective Statement 0H1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality • Objective Statement UH1.2 - |nadeWuatethernno( cornforL • Section 0.32.Venti|atinn o Subsection 9.32'4.Additional Requirements Against Depressurization m Article 9'324.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms epp|iestmthis building. * Section 9.33. Heating and Air-conditioning o Subsections 0.33-1.. .2.' .3.' .5.. .S. and .10. Required Heating Systems, Design Tem0erotupes, General Requirements for Heating and Air-conditioning Syatanos, Heating and Air-conditioning Appliances, Air Duct Systems and chimneys and Venting Equipment respectively apply tOthis building. Common Prope Unit 12(Pictures 231-235.237-24O,243) * Building perimeter at grade line is rotting out due to height of backfill and constructed walkways. • Guard /hanUna||atsteps outside unit porch are not code COOlp|ian.t. ° Fire separation incrawl space ianot complete tounit 9and 11' * Standing water incrawl space. • Mould ondrywall in crawl space. ° Heating system supply piping isdegraded tothe point 0fnot being functional • Grade slopes toward building directing all water failing on yard to build-up at foundation. Interior Space Unit 12 0 No 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms have been installed in this unit. The following iaabreak down ufsections from the B]C.Building Code that are not being meet. These items I consider to be of health and life safety concerns in accordance with the objectives of the B.0 Building Code and would require upgrading tu be in compliance with the B.C. Building Code. Due towater ingress into the building etthe exterior grade line the structural integrity ofthe building and its structural components are deteriorating to the point where repairs must be performed to prevent collapse of the building and harm tothe buildings occupants: w Objective statement OS2.3 - Damage to or deterioration of building elements. • Sentences 8.3,2.9.(3)anU Clause (a) structural elements to be treated with a preservative when clearance tofinished ground ioless the 150mnn. • Article 9.12.3.2. Grading of Backfill - required to prevent drainage towards the foundation • Objective Statement DHL1-Inadequate indoor air qua|(ty w Objective Statement OH 1.3 - contact with DlO|stU[e m Section 9.13. Dampproofing'Waterproofing and Soil Gas Control • Subsection 9.18.5. Dnainage, which deals with collection and removal water from these spaces. p SUhsect0n9.2O.4. Flashing at Intersections o Sentence 9.26.4.1.(2) - deals with platforms that effectively act as nJUfS for the accumulation or drainage of precipitation which isthe case with the raised wooden walkways and concrete side walks. The exterior guard/handrail by the entrance to this unit does not comply with Section 9.0 of the BC Building Code and are required to berepaired tOmeet the following code requirements. � Section A.8.Stairs, Ramps, Handrails and Guards o Subsection g.A.7.Handrails � Articles 9'8.7.1, .2, .4., .5, .O. & 7. - These articles deal with Required Handrails, Continuity of Handraihs, Height nfHandn8i|S. Ergonomic Design, Projections into Stairs and Ramps 8/ Design and Attachment of Handrails respectively. Nnneofthese areas are met inthe current building. o Subsection g.8.8.Guards � Artidos8.B.8,1, .2.' .3, .5, 8 .6. - These Articles deal with Required Guards, Loads on Guarda. Height of Guards' Openings in Guards and Design to prevent Climbing. None Ofthese items are metwithin this building. The required fire separation between adjacent units has been damaged or not completed- These walls will require repair tuthe following criteria: * Subsection 9.10.9. Fire Separations between Rooms and Spaces within Buildings o Article 0.1O.0.2.Continuous Barrier - continuity U[fire Sep@r@tiOns- o Sentence 9.10.9.14.(3) Separation of Residential Suites - requires the fire rating - The building is lacking fire and carbon monoxide detection systems required for basic life safety notification and require the re|nsta|lGUon of smoke a|annn and carbon monoxide detectors that comply with the following criteria: * Subsection 9.1D.19.Smoke Alarms • ArtiC|8ng.10.Ig.1.' .2.' .3', .4. & .5' Deal with Required Smoke Alarms, Location of Smoke A|@rnnS. Power Supply, Interconnection Of Smoke Alarms and Instructions for Maintenance and Care respectively. • Article 932.4.2.Carbon Monoxide Alarms. The buildings heating system has degraded or been 0VUKied to the point that repair arid rep|8Cern8ntiarequired astothe following sections: * Objective Statement OH1.1- Inadequate indoor air qua|Ky " Objective StatementOH1.2 - inadequate thermal comfort * Section 8.32.VenLi|etimn a Subsection 8.324.Additional Requirements Against Depressurization ° Article 9,32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms applies tothis building. * Section S.33Heating and Air-conditioning o Subsections 9.33'1., .2, .3.. .5.` .S. and .10. Required Heating Syytema, Design Temperatures,, General Requirements for Heating and Air-conditioning Systema, HeBUigand Air-conditioning App|i8nceS'Air Duct Systems amd.chimneys and Venting Equipment respectively apply tothis building. 1ƒ701Fraser Street Common PropeU Unit 13 (Pictures 170 - 173. 181- 188) w Building perimeter atgrade line is rotting out due to heightof baokfi|| and constructed walkways. w Bedroom windows are not all functioning or able to meet egress requirements. m Fire separation in orevv| space is not complete to unit 14. Due tmthe amount of material stored in crawl space was uDab|e.tosee crawl space fire separation t0unit 16. • Standing water incrawl epoce, w Mould mndrywall incrawl space. w Heating system supply piping isdegraded tothe point ofnot being functional Interior Sl2ace Unit 13(Pictures 174.182.185,i8Q) • Interconnected 110voitsmoke alarms have all been removed m Access to craw[ has been modified which has lead to damage of floor joist at bottom of stairs. w Bedroom vviDd0vvS are not all fUnCtiOningO[able 10 meet egress requirements. • Portion ofwall between two bedrooms has been removed. This appears t0U88load bearing wall. • Standing water in crawl space creating health issues as well as saturating drywall in fire separation. Drainage provided incrawl spaces Must bekept clear atall times. Also, storage isnot tobeplaced \nthe crawl space oo@atOprevent orinKibitdrainage. * Evidence 0fhGb|t@ti0n in crawl space. The -following is a break down of sections frorn the B.C. Building Code that are not being met.These items | consider to be of health and life safety concerns in accordance with the objectives of the B,C Building Code and would require upgrading tQbeiDcompliance with the B.C.Building Code. Due 10water ing/esainto the building atthe exterior grade line the structural integrity of the buildin6 and its structural components are deteriorating tothe point where repairs must beperformed toprevent collapse cK the building and harm tothe buildings occupants: * Objective statement 0S2.3 - Damage to or deterioration of buildingelements. w Sentences 9.3-2.9.(3)and Clause (a` structural elements to be treated with a preservative when clearance tofinished ground isless the 150mm. • A�ic|eB.12.3.2. Grading OfBaukfiU - required to prevent drainage towards the foundation w Objective Statement OH 1.1 - Inadequate indoor air quality • Objective Statement OH 1.3 - contact with moisture " Section 9.13.DamppnuVfing.Waterproofing and Soil Gas Control • Subsection 9.18.5, Drainage, which Uoele with no||88tinn and removal water from these spaces. * Subsection 9.20.4. Flashing at Intersections o Sentence 9.26.4.1.(2) - deals with platforms that effectively act as roofs for the accumulation or drainage of precipitation which is the case with the raised wooden vva|k*eysand concrete side walks. Exterior bedroom windows in the unit do not complying with the requirements in Article 9.7.1�. "Bedroom Windows" for egress in cases of emergency ard are required to be repaired or replaced, The required fire separation between adjacent units has been damaged. These walls will require repair tothe following criteria: � Section 9L10.Fire Protection c. Subsection 9.10.9. Fire Separations between Rooms and Spaces within Buildings � Article g.1U.A2'Continuous Barrier - continuity offire Separ8tiOnS,. � Sentence 9.10.9.14.(3)Seperat|on of Residential Suites - requires thaf|r8 separation to have e 1.0 hour fire resistance rating. o Article 0.10.8.9. deals with fire protection ofcrawl space. The --rawlspace is being used -cis living space which does not meet code for use mdesign, � Subsection 9.5.3.Ceiling Heights W Required headroom and minimum ceiling heights for safety and egress. The building is lacking fire and carbon monoxide detection systems required for basic |ffe safety notification and require the reinstallation of smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors that comply with the following criteria: w Subsection 8.1O.19.Smoke Alarms • Articles .2.' ^3, .4. & .5. Dgo| with Required Smoke Alarms, Location of Smoke Alarms, Power Supply, Interconnection of Smoke Alarms and Instructions for Maintenance and Care respectively. w Article 9.32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms. An opening has been created in a load bearing wall connecting to rooms into one larger room. This opening appears to have been created in a load bearing wall. Due to the construedon being complete | unn unable to daterrn|ne what - if anything- has been inate|ied to carry tile roof load at this opening. The structural treatment of openings must comply with the following criteria: � Subsection Q.23.12.Framing over Openings. o Article 9.23.12.2. Deals with the framing criteria for support and attachment of structural elements. o Article 9.23.123. Deals with the actual designing of the member spanning the opening. Tlie bui|din�s system sy8t�has degraded or been modified to the point ths- repair and replacement isrequired aStDthe following S8CtionS� • Objective Statement OH1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality ° Objective StotementOH1.2-Inadequate thermal cnnnio� • Section 9.32.Venti|ation o Subsection B.32.4.Additional Requirements AgainS1Depressurization m Article 9.32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms applies tothis building, * Section Q.33.Heating and Air-conditioning o Subsections 9.33.1.. .2.. .3.. .5., .6. and .10. Required Heating Systems, Design Temperatures, General Requirements for Heating and Air-conditioning Systema, HeotingandAipoonditioniDgApp|ienoes'AirDuctSystemsandchinnneysandVentin8 Ecuipment respectively apply tothis building. Common PropeLty Unit14 (Pictures 195 - 202) • Building perimeter at grade line is rotting out due to height of backfill and constructed walkways, w Bedroom windows are not all functioning or able to meet egress requirements. ° Fire separation incrawl space isnot complete tounits 13Q'1@. ° Mould ondrywall incrawl space. • Heating system supply piping iadegraded ormissing tnthe point nfnot being functional Unit 14(Pictures 1g2-` 84,202'203) ° Interconnected 110volt smoke o|armshave all been removed. w Hand/Guard rails are required to main stair case. � Fire separation near top 0fstairs iSdamaged. ° Guard rail attachment attop ofstairs does not allow guard 1omeetforce resistance required by code. The following is a break down of sections from the B.C. Building Code that are not being met, 'These items| consider to be of health and life safety concerns in accordance with the objectives of the B.0 Building Code and would require upgrading tobeincompliance with the B.C.Bui|ding Code: Due 1owoteringresa into the building atthe exterior grade line the structural integrity ofthe building and its structural components are deteriorating to the point where repairs must be performed to prevent collapse of the building and hG/nn to the buildings occupants: * Objective stat*mentOS2.3 - Damage to or deterioration ofbuilding elements. * Sentences 8.3.2.9`(3)and Clause (o) structural elements to be treated with � presen/etive when clearance tofinished ground isless the 150nonn. ° Article 9.12'3.2. Grading of8eokfil| - required to prevent drainage towards the foundation * Objective Statement OH 1.1 - Inadequate indoor air quality * Objective Statement OH 1.3 - contact with moisture • Section 9.13.Dampp/oofn8,Waterproofing and Soil Gas Control • Subsection 9.18.5. Dnainage, which dea|s with oo||eotion and removal water from those spaces, m Subsection 9.26.4. F|aahingot Intersections o Sentence 9.26.4.1.(2) - deals with platforms that effectively act as roofs for the accumulation or drainage of preoipi1otion which is the case with the raised wooden walkways and concrete side walks. Exterior bedroom windows in the unit do not complying with the requirements in Article 9.7-1.2. "Bedroom Windows" for egress in cases of emergency and are required to be repaired or replaced, The guard/handrails donot comply with Section 9.8nfthe BCBuilding Code and are required toba napairedto meet the following code requirements. a Section 9.8. Stairs, Ramps, Handrails and Guards o Subsection QJ8IHandrails � Articles 9.8.7.1, .2, .4` .5, .G. & .7. - These articles deal with Required HonUnoi|s. Continuity of Handrails, Height of Hmndraiis, Ergonomic Design' Projections into Stairs and Romps & Design and Attachment of Handrails respectively, None ofthese areas are met inthecurrent building. o Subsection 91.8'8.6ua/Us w Articles 9.8.8.1, 2, .3, .5. /& These Articles deal with Required Guards, Loads on Guards. Height of Guerds. Openings in Guards and Design to prevent Climbing. None of these items are met within this building. The required fine separation between adjacent units has been damaged or nntoomp|etod. These walls will require repair tuthe following criteria: � Subsection 9.10.9, Fire Separations between Rooms and Spaces within Buildings o Article 9.10.Q.2.Continuous Barrier - continuity offire aeper@tOna,. o Sentence 9.10,9.14.(3) Separation of Residential Suites - requires the fire separation to have a 1,0 hour fire resistance rating. The building is lacking fire and carbon monoxide detection systems required for basic life safety notific8tinn. The reinstallation of smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors that comply with the following criteria must bedone: * Subsection 8.1O.18'Smoke Alarms w Artic|es 9.10.19-1.. .2.. .3'. '4. & .5. Deal with Required Smoke Alarms, Location of Smoke Alarms, Power Supply, Interconnection 0fSmoke Alarms and Instructions for Maintenance and Care respectively. * Article 9.32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms. The required clearances to combustibles above the units stove is not being met and must be repaired-. � Subsection 9.10.22.Fire Protection for Gas, Propane and Electric Ranges o Adjdms 9.10'22.2. & .3. outline the requirements for the Vertical Clearances above Ranges and Protection around Ranges. The buildings heating system has degraded or been modified to the point that repair and replacement isrequired estothe following sections: * OtdectiveStatement OH1A. - Inadequate indoor- air quality * Objective Statement 0H1-2-Inadequate thermal comfort m Section 9.32.Ventilation o SubseotiunQ.32.4. Additional Requirements Against De 0resaurizmtiVn ° Article Q.32.4.2.Carbon Monoxide Alarms applies tothis build |ng. * section 9.33.Heating and Air-conditioning o Subsections 9.33.1., .2.. .3, .5, .6. and .10. Required Heating Systems, Design Temperatures, Gen -oral Requirements for Heating and Air-conditioning Syatems' Hea�ing and Air-conditioning Appliances, Air Duct Systems arld chimneys and Venting Equipment respectively apply tOthis building. Common groperty Unit15 * No apparent issue as perimeter of crawl space is finished and exterior grade is below top of foundation. Interior Soace Unit 15( 7,209) 0 Hand/Guard rails are required to main stair case. Currentlytheu�'t has guard/handrails that do not comply with Section 9.8 of the BC Building Code or are completely missing. The requirements in the following sections would need to be met: * Section Q}].SLairs.Ramps, Handrails and Guards o Subsection Q.8.7.Handrails ° Articles 9.871. .2, .4, .5, .8. & .7. -These articles deal with Required Handrails, Continuity of Handrails, Height ofHandrails, Ergonomic Design, Projections into Stairs and Ramps & Design and Attachment of Handrails respectively. None ofthese areas are met inthe current building, o Subsection g.8.8.Guards � Articiaa8,8.B.1, .2, .3.. .5.&'6. - These Articles dea|with Required Guards, Loads on Guards, Height of Guards'. Openings in Guards and Design to prevent Climbing. None ofthese KemSare met within this building. ComLn_on Property Unit 1G(Pictures 220-224) * Fire separation incrawl space ienot complete tounit 15and unit 13. * Exterior crawl space access katobefitted with 8door. * Building perimeter at grade line is rotting out due to height of backfill and constructed walkways. Interior SDace Unit 16(RcLunEA220) � Holes in Urywo|| mtstairwell cD[npn}/nksing fire separation. urnace not working hShd|owin;� isabreak down of sections from the B�Building Code that are not beingmet. Those items consider to be of health and life safety concerns in accordance with the objectives of the B.0 Building Code and would require upgrading to be in compliance with the B.C. Building Code. Due towater ingress into the building atthe exterior grade line the structural integrity of the building and its structural components are deteriorating to the point where repairs must be performed to prevent collapse of the building and harm tothe buildings occupants: • Objective ata1omentOS2.3 - Damage to or deterioration ofbuilding elements. • Sentences 9,3.2.9.(3)and Clause (a) structural elements to be treated with e preservative when clearance tVfinished ground ieless the 15Ornnn. * Article 9.12.3.2. Grading of Backfi|! - required to prevent drainage towards the foundation ^ Objective Statement OH1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality * Objective Statement DH 1.3 - contact with moisture ^ Section B.13'D8n0pprO0fiOg,Waterproofing and Soil Gas Control ~ Subsection 8.18'5. Drainage, which deals with c0||8c1|on and removal water from these spaces. * Subsection 8.26.4. Flashing atIntersections o Sentence 9.26.4.1.(2) - deals with platforms that effectively act as roofs for the accumulation or drainage of precipitation which is the case with the raised wooden vva}hvvays and concrete side walks. The required fins separation between adjacent units has been damaged or not completed. These walls will require repair tothe following criteria: w Subsection 9.1Of>.Fire Separations between Rooms and Spaces within Buildings o Article 9'1D.9.2.Continuous Barrier - continuity Offire S8p8yationS, * Sentence 0.10.9.14.(3) Separation of Residential Suites - requires the fire separation to have 1.0 hour fire resistance rating. The building is lacking fire and carbon monoxide detection syatenns required for b0SC life safety notification and require the r�inst��ion Of Snke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors that comply with the following criteria: • Subsection Q.1O.1Q.Smoke Alarms • Articles 9.10.19.1.. .2~ .3.1, .4. & .5' Deal with Required Smoke A|0rrna' Location of Smoke Alarms, Power Supply, Interconnection ofSmoke Alarms and Instructions for K4GiOLenaDue and Care respectively. • Article 9.32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms. Exterior access tocrawl space istobefitted with adoor. • Objective statement OH2.5-contact with vermin and insects The buildings heating system has degraded or been modified to the point that repair and replacement iarequired astuthe fn||mwingsections: * Objective Statement OH1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality * Objective Statement OH12-Inadequate thermal comfort * Section Q.32.Ventilation o Subsection 8.@2.4.Additional Requirements Against Depressurization I Article 8.32.4.2.Carbon Monoxide Alarms applies h}this building. w Section 9.33.Heating and Air-conditioning o Subsections 9.331' .2, .3, '5.` .G. and .10. Required Heating Syatemm, Design Temporaturao, General Requirements for Heating and Air-conditioning Systern5, Hw|Dg and Air-conditioning Appliances, Air Duct Systerns and chimneys and Venting Equipment respectively apply t0this building. 1715 Fraser Street Common Property Unit 17(Pictures 286.287.297,301.302) ° Building perimeter at grade line is rotting out due to height ofhmokfiU and constructed walkways. • 8ecroom windows are not all functioning orable to meet egress requirements. • Fire separation in crawl space is not complete to unit 6. Due to the amount of material stored In craw: space was unable tosee crawl space fire separation tOU0itB. • Mould ODdrywall in crawl space. • Heating system supply piping is degraded to the point of not being functional. Interior Space Unit 17(PiDLures2S3-28{,3O3) * Furnace ducting removed • Upstairs north side bedroom window nailed shut with plywood covering opening ° Nunand orguard na!|uare provided tostair orupper floor hallway • Interconnected 110 volt smoke alarms have all been removed • Furnace not working. The following isabreak down of sections from the B�Building Code that are not being met. These items cons:der to be of health and life safety concerns in accordance with the objectives of the B.0 Building Code and would require upgrading hJUe|Ocompliance with the B.C.Building Code. Due towater ingress into the building atthe exterior grade line -the structural integrity ofthe building andi'Ls structural components are deteriorating to the point where repairs must be performed to prevent collapse of the building and harm to the buildings occupants: • Objective statement OS2.3 - Damage to or deterioration of building elements. w Senhano8s 9.3.2.9.(3)and Qoun8 (a) structural elements to be treated with 8 preservative when clearance tofinished ground ialess the 15Omno. ^ Article 9.12.3.2. Grading of Beckfi|| - required to prevent drainage towards the foundation • Obj-ective Statement OH 1.1 - Inadequate indoor air quality * Objective Statement OH 1.3 - contact with moisture • Section B.13.Damnppronfing.Waterproofing and Soil Gas Control • Subsection 9.10.5. Drainage, which deals with collection and nannDvn| water from these spaces, m Subsection Q.26,4.Flashing at Intersections o Sentence 9.264.1.(2) - deals with platforms that effectively act as roofs for the accumulation or drainage ofpreuipitation which is the case with the raised wooden walkways and concrete side walks. Bedroom windows in the unit do not complying with the requi/enients in Article 9I1.2. "Bedroom Windows"f-Ir egress in cases of emergency end are required to be repaired or replaced. The guard/handrails dnnot comply with Section 98ofthe BCBuilding Code and are required tube repaired to meet the following code requirements. w Section 9.8.Stairs, Ramps, Handrails and Guards o Subaection9.8.7. Handrails m Articles 9.8I1-. .2. .4, .5, .S. & I - These onbdes dmu! with Required Handrails, Continuity of Handrails, Height of HandrBiks, Ergonomic Design, Projections into Stairs and Ramps & Design and Attachment of Handrails respectively. None ofthese areas are met in'the current building. o Subsection S.0.8'Guards � Articles S.88.1...2...3...5.&.6.-These Articles deal with Required Guards, Loads on Guards, Height of Guards, Openings in Guards and Design to prevent Climbing. None ofthese items are met within this building. The required fire separation between adjacent units has been damaged or not completed. These waUswiU require repair tothe following criteria: * Subsection 9.10.9. Fire Separations between Rooms and Spaces within Buildings o Article 8'10.9.2.Continuous Barrier - continuity offire Separ8tOns.. o Sentence 9.10.9.14.(3) Separation of Residential Suites - requires the fire separation to have a1.0hour fire resistance rating. The building is lacking fire and carbon n)onmjdS datont.on systems required for basic life safety notification and require the reinstallation of smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors that ounoPlywith the following :hte/ia: * Subsection B.1O.19.Sm0ke Alarms w Articles 9.10.19.1.. .2., .3.. .4. & .5' Deal with. Required Smoke Alarms, Location of Smoke Alarms, Power Supply, Interconnection of Smoke Alarms and Instructions for Maintenance and Care respectively. * Article 9.32'4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms. The buildings heating system has degraded or been modified to dnm point that repair and replacement i5required mStOthe following sections: • Objective Statement OH1.1 - Inadequate indoor air quality • Objective StotemontOH1.2 - Inadequate thermal nomfmrt • Section 0.32.Vend|ation o Subsection g.32.4.Additional Requirements Against Depressurization ° Article 9.32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms applies tothis building. ° Section A.33.Heating and Air-conditioning o Subsections 9.33.1, 2. 3.' .5, S. and .10. Required Heating Systems, DaaiQp Temperatures, General Requirements for Heating and Air-conditioning Systems, Heating and Air-conditioning Appliances, Air Duct Systems and chimneys and W*nbn 9 Equ|prneni respectively apply t0 this building. Unit 1B(Pictures 2G5,2O0,275.281,283.284) • Building perimeter at grade line is rotting out due to height of backfill and constructed walkways. w Bedroom windows are not all functioning orable to nnec{ egress requirements. • Firasepmnatinn in cnavv| space is not complete tn unit17. * Standing water incrawl space. • Mould ondrywall |ncrawl space. w Rat feces incrawl • Rot insupporting structure v Heating system supply piping iSdegraded tothe point ofnot being functional Unit 1B(Pictures 26T'271) 0 Upstairs bedroom window no glass w Standing water in crawl space creating health issues as well as saturating drywall in fire separation. Drainage provided |ncrawl spaces mustbekept clear etall times. Also, storage innot tobeplaced inthe crawl space soestoprevent orinhibit drainage. ° interconnected 110volt smoke alarms have all been removed w Holes infire separation atmainfloor bathroom The following is a break down of sections from the B.C. Building Code that are riot being rneL These itoms| oonsidertobeofhealthand|ifeoafetyconcerneinaocurdanoevviththeobjeobwssof1hoB.CBui\d|nQQzde and would require upgrading to be in compliance with the B.C. Building Code. Due towater ingress into the building aT-dleexterior grade line the structural integrity Of -the building and its structural components are deteriorating to the point where repairs must be performed to prevent collapse of the building and harm tothe buildings occupants, ° Objective statonnentOS2.3 - Damage to or deterioration of building elements. * Sentences 9.3.2.9.(8)8nd Clause (a) structural elements to be treated with o preservative when clearance 1mfinished ground isless the 15Omrn. * Article 9.12.3.2. Grading of Backfill - required to prevent drainage towards the foundation � Objective Statement OH 1.1 - Inadequate indoor air quality ° Objective Statement OH1.3-contact with moisture � Section 9.13, Oampproofing, Waterproofing and Soil 8OS CoAtro! � Subsection 9.18.5. Drainage, which deals with C0||oct1OD and removal water frorn these spaces. � Subsection 9.26.4.Flashing atIntersections o Sentence 9.28.4.1.(2) - deals with platforms that effectively act as roofs for the accumulation or drainage of precipitation which is the case with the raised wooden walkways and concrete side walks. Bedroom windows in the unit do not complying with the requirements in Article 9.7.1.2. ~Bedroorn Windows"for egress in cases of emergency and are required to be repaired or replaced. The required fire separation between adjacent units has been damaged or not completed.. These walls will require repair tothe following criteria: m Subsection 9.10.9. Fire Separations between Rooms and Spaces within Buildings o Article 9.1O.Q.2.Continuous Barrier - continuity offireseparaUuns.. o Sentence 9.10,9.14.(3) Separation of Residential Suites - nyqui[as the fire separation to have a 1.0 hour fire resistance rating. The building is lacking fine and carbon monoxide detection systems required for basic life safety notification and require the reinstallation of smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors thet comply with the following critohs: • Subsection S.1.O.IB.Smoke Alarms • Articles 0.10.19.1.. .2., .3.. .4, & .5, Deal with Required Smoke Alarms, Location of Smoke Alarms, Power Supply. Interconnection ofSmoke Alarms and Instructions for Maintenance and Care respectively. * Artio|eg.32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms. The buildings heating system has degraded or been modified to the point that repair and rep|anementiarecui/gdastothe following sections: • Objective Statement OH1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality m Objective StotementOH1.2 - Inadequate 'thermal comfort • Section Q.32.Ventilation o Subsection Q.32'4'Additional Requirements Against Depressurization = Article 9.32.4.2. Carbon Monoxide Alarms applies tothis building. • Section 9.33. Heating and Air-conditioning o Subsections 9.33.1, .2, .3, .5.' .G. and .10. Required HeatingSyStems. Design Temperatures, General Requirements for Heating and Air-conditioning Systems. Heating and Air-conditioning Appliances, Air Duct Systems and chimneys and Venting Equi�mentrespectively apply tothis building, Common Prone Unit1g * Noentry made, unit |aapparently unfcCupieriotthis time. • Windows appear to be not functioning and exterior sliding door has been modified with building structure left exposed ^ Unable tosee perimeter ofbuilding atgrade line due tomaterial around perimeter ofstructure • Brokenexleriorwindows. Unit 2O(Pictures 31O-313) m Bui|dingpehm8terat grade line isrotting out due toheight ofbaokfiUand constructed walkways. • Fire separation incrawl space iSnot complete tounit 17and unit 19, Interior spagq Unit 20(Pictures 3OO.310-312) ° Fire separation isnot complete st penetrations and sea[ toframing incrawl space. * Clearance to combustibles over stove is not being met. The following ks@break down ofsections fn}mthe Bl�Building Code that are riot being met. These benlS| consider to be of health and :ife safetv concerns in accordance with the objectives of the B.0 Building. Code and would require upgrading to heincompliance with the 8.C. Building Code. Due to water ingress into the building at the exterior grade line the structural integrity ofthe building and its structural components are deteriorating to the point where repairs must be performed to prevent collapse of tlie building and harm tnthe buildings occupants: • Objective statement OS2.3 - Damage to or deterioration ofbuilding e|amantx. m Sentences 8.3.2.9.(3)mnd Clause (a) structural elements to be treated with o preservative when clearance t0finished ground iSless the 15Onn[n. ° Article 9,12.3.2. Grading of B8Ckf|l| - required to prevent drainage towards the foundation • Objective Statement OH1.1-Inadequate indoor air quality • Objective Statement OH 1.3 - contact with moisture • Section 9.13. DampProofing' Waterproofing and 5ni| Gas Control * Subsection 9.18.5. DreinaQe, which deals with collection and removal water from these spaces. The required fire separation between adjacent units has been damaged or not completed. These walls will require repair tmthe following criteria: � Subsection 9.10.9. Fire Separations between Rooms and Spaces within Buildings o Article 9.1D.9.2.Continuous Barrier - continuity nffire aeparatons, o Sentence 9.10.9.14.(3) Separation of Residential Suites - requires the Fire sepenation1nhave a.Ohour fire resistance rating. The building is lacking fine protection to onnnbuetb|ea around the stove and is required to be corrected: � Subsection 8.10.22.Fire Protection for Gas, Propane and Electric Ranges o Articles 9.10.22.2. & .3. outline the requirements for the Vertical Clearances above Ranges and Protection around Ranges. Although the code does not have a specifiCcodeSectioMwithinDivisionB-Part 9 todeal with 8nvinJnmento| separation and hm30) requirements, multi -residential buildings are required to comply with all of the provisions set out in Division B - Part 5 - "Environmental Separation" which deals with the separation and mitigation of the mixing of interior and exterior environments in an uncontrolled manner. This is further stated by the codes Objective Statement OHI Indoor Conditions; "An objective of this Code is to limit the probability that, as a result of the design or construction of the building, a person in the building will be exposed to an unacceptable risk of illness due to indoor conditions. The risks of illness due to indoor conditions addressed in this Code are those Caused by - OH 1.1- inadequate indoor air quality, OH1.3 - contact withunuisture''.and Objective Statement UH2Sanitaton:. "An objective ofthis code kstolimit the probabi|kythat, asaresult nfthe design orconstruction of the building. Aperson inthe building will he exposed toanUnacceptable risk ofillness due to uDsaniteryoonditi0nS. T�erisks ofillness due toUnS8nitaryconditions addressed inthis Code are those caused Uy-DH2'5-con-act with vermin and inseots.. Thekarnskjen��edforaau�oftheunitsare items that donot comply with the codes Objective Statements for|ifeondhealthsah*tyandererequinsdtVUeupgrodedtoensureCOmp|i8noevvhhtheB.C.Bui|dingCmde. Further, due tuthe degree of environmental contamination from water ingress into the bUild|Dg, all units are to be certified by an individual or corporation certified by the Canadian Registcallion Board of Occupational Hygienists or the American Board of Industrial Hygiene to ensure tile remedial work completed nnaata minimunnindoor air -quality requirements aespecified byhealth Canada, Conclusion The items con--ained within this report and the napoAa appended to 'from the Plumbing |napeo1or/Gaa Safety Officer and the Electrical Safety Officer provided to me as the Manager of Inspection Services: are items that directly relate to the life end health safety requirements of the B.C. Bui\ding Code, B.C. Plumbing Code, Natural Gas and Propane installation Code and the Canadian Electrical Code, codes which are enforced under the District Of K8Bp|e Ridge's Building Bylaw No. 818U-2003. These items in the opinion of the Gas and Beothmg| Safety officers and the Manager of Inspection Services are items that are required to be repaired to ensure, the continued life and health safety of persons occupying Or attending these properties. Further' it is my opinion that the longer these items go unrepaired the deterioration. of the structures and indoor environments will be sucr that it would not hefinancially viable to rehabilitate these buildings. Also, the potential for injury or death to persons attending mi residing in these premises is incneas'ngthg longer the life safety features UOemi0neU not only in this document but in that produced by yN8p|e Ridges Fire Chief are left Stephen 105t6-Rokink,R.B/]. BUILDING CODE Division Section 2.1. Application 2.1.1. Application 2.1.1.1. Application 1) This ran applies to 7l; t iJii r13".s' and phrnt= np y": tams roverf'd in this Code, (.Sew Article. 1 A 1.1.) 2.1.1.2. Application of Objectives 1) Except as ; ruvsded lit Serte ces (2) to (5), the obie', ijle�; described it this Part apply a to all buildings and joNr hrmr s=:Stems covered In INS Code (Sep Article t.1,1.1 4, and t;) unly to the extent Iolal the,,,/ re'iate to romp=izrice with 1iis Code as requited sn Article 1.2A.1. 2'pz Oniet;iiv? GS4, Resistance to Unwanted 'Ently. alopliers os1 i to FBilIng units. 3) Objective OH3, Noise Protef ticrj:: 1})plies Cr1ly to d) Objective QH5. Hazardous Subs,ances Con'ainrnent, applies oniv t?J the e:',W defined in ai this Crsde in rlrtiort to pftl;r tJitig 6�strrrs, arad the British Columbia Fire Code. ) Objective OA, AccessitE,;,ty (iricludirg Cb;octi.re 0A1. Accessible Path of Tra.ve', aid W, Acce little, FaOifies). does r'C4 apply to a) in Group C, d;',("tr+?j ijoiL3, row "muses, boarding 'hQUSeS a0d lrodging hcuses; b). in Croup G. apartnifnt PuildingSand c0ndorniriiurns exc, pf to ,sae extrrit described in Afftie 3.8,2.27., c) in Group E, droops and stores'r,`jth a total retail fluor S;; U! of IayS than 30 IT72 (See I I in DiIvisi.ion ), di Group F Divisions 1 occu,oar,ci s, and el blubdirys that Are nol intended to bP occupfed on 3.,Jdiiy OF fall -unite basis, including automatic telephone exchanges, Pump louses and substations, Section 2.2. Objective 2.2.1. Objectives 1) The objecti•rfts of this Code are as Wows Sec Appendix M., DS Safety Ai, ccjective of this Code is to lirnif the timbability that, as a res:alt of the designs, construction or demolition of the b€.dilding, a person in or adjacent to the hruildrrtg'Nill be exposed to an uria:ceplable risk of i0ilry. OS1 Erre Safety 4rfraoj?cfl;'P, Cf iiti fi,}L� i8 Ct.i i'If tr€c , :t71 :iC)tilf:i rids:, as r re,3ult of the design or fconsir=uctj;;n of the i)r:ilrjr. a person in of adjace€t, to thia building Mll be exposed to ara t na€ c:j jptabie risk of injur, du; to fire The risk: of iiajuiy u'ue to fire add;e: 'se(in ihiS Cud" are; thme caosf d b -"- CS1.1 - fire ei expiesion orcurrinc; 081.2 fire or explosion impacting areabeyond ii5 �r,'!)=fit v' �rigii Full r dSe of pf'a;1Si ; l el€rrf;erlis rlije to :1 file Cii" gyfjj()Si{7n JSi.,i — fire Satet'yt symems. failing to function as expected 1�)S1 n — perso;js ceil;g h°I=:fCI i^ 3f' irYiC?ic'`( from moving t'o a Safe place di.iring a fir f�r<reraerid,d,= OS2 Structural Safety An objective of 1N,, Code it; to limit Me probability 3E, 3ti fns alt Js fh' dussgri or flio f ?fri( iii}j.a person in or 3diacerit to the bu; :df ig vIT be exposed tc an ufiacceptallle risk of injii;`;= dive to Struetrirai failt,ra. The risks of irdwy duf, io structural f ilum addressed in this Code :€re those caused b — ?i 5.1 sits bearing rr the t1 idfl'Jt7(j vlerme€af5 that exceed their lloadi+'''arhiq cap&a ty CS 2.2 - loads beadrig ;oi-i the b riidwg that exceed the r f r oiler'! s of 'situ xc Cl to Ciac,c'r�:irr�t prvh.,,..,;r., ... . St;Ppwiting rnd dt im, OS2:3 - damage If) o, deieriorati€;n of to >tfi;t ll:�r:ur:S MA - O mli n of dehectlw, of bra dirig iiedl niil� CS'? 5 instability of the bwfdiog or parm thereo +OS2.6 coltapse of the excadralior W Safety in Use inn objective of this Code is t: limit the probability that as a result of the design; or rogstructior: ;of the bull irg, a person in u ad acent to the boil ji.7D ,;J?l de exposed to an ujia.c eptable risk of injgary due to i?mi'c'.iv'�. `he risks of ifljupy r•tae to hazards addressed ar this Co&.i' are those cawsed ;y_._ OS 3.1 - tripping, slipping, fsdll sag, Contllct' dr` wnin Jt collision 0S12 - contact w4h l;o' suf aces or substances rJS3.3 Contact k^r th energized equipment 1SS3,4 - exposure to hazardou's suln,Slauc',, d S3.v - exposure to high lem s of sound finny hr�e aiarin systeriis O.S3,6. — personr5 tern?Y ing impped in Confinod spaces OS3.7 _. persons being delayed in of impeded frorn fn avinrg to <+ safe place during an emergericy (See Appendix A; 19 Divis ion A -Part 384 'resistance to Unwanted Eetry An CiPieCtive of tfl's Code is to liinli {hlr prouab l;tv liha', as? reY, i; w 3thr dead{in C:' orlstr'c',ion th':'.:}?}Frj%t77(< a pprson in t.NN , t.7t1liti`.','??° odli yr, ex 3osed tO ;rs unai ce labir.risk Of tf iuni,, oue to the bw*lt hwj S o`; leve! :i( res-cstance to L',ji+,xanted enif V {fee S#;nter ce ,:. t.1.2 #`2) fin : aptJN atli"n ii('#' tatir-;n ih€ risks °3. Enid(( diAe to unwanted e n tre nri_,iress;Erl I#) to s Gode are those caused by---- C#S• .1 - intruders being able to forve ihairTaal through locked doors 01 lArirl'Ot ..,�"1.2 - occupants being iun@1.'•t' to i?lenttf>> ;: ari'inl lieltruders as such S5 Safety at Construction and Demolition Sites An obieciive of this Code is to liriit the probability that. as a r, ; jr of the constructiuii or T# 3lEiiG:1 Ji the bviid;r7g. tine publk, adjac'e#A to a constr€ cfiori or dernolili: sit',. will ba expogzd to an unacceptable risk of Injury :due to hazards.: tie, risks trf injury due !o COs[5trtE#, ir!; aM deingi,tion hazards addressed in thJs Code are those caused by — OS ', i - ronierts Projected onto public 065.2 - Ve'ii ;filar accidenIs oil pfi{ii 4,' i, ajs .� dainage to or obsti Uctioi.1 st i bbU ii i «yS accUfiluWed in cxca""✓ation-' 036; .5 - Grit ,y irAo the Site C '`)�'i;..,i'i - r�k:}w:SLii�' tot<��ai!rt:u.i ZtitlsPenCr'j +oral, ties ;,S-5. r - loads bearing or, a cwvered *ay that ex' eed its ioadbearing capacay CS?.S collapse (if 'he excavation OS5.9 - perv.orts berg delayed in or irp.oF ed torn fnio'm,� to a safe Plaice d'Jfir'p an e-w,, gG'iicy ;5;',xe App eridtx r" i ON Health An obS w'tive ow this Code i4 to limit thp probabdiN, iNat aS a `'e'.siuot ff thg design nr cons-tfuct,4,011 of the bu ldip.gr. a ?e"sol ol!I be exposed to art risk. r.t if ne5s 1,11 Indoor Conditions obiective ol'his ;code is in limit the arobabilit.. that a.= a moult of the de:SI n or construction of the t`JS.ia` q. a pe'i s:ov in ffte bi ifaing'will be exposed 10 an unacceptable risk of illness due to indoor cond': icros. 'le risks of illness due to indoor cori;fition.: addressed in this Cade ar;p those causes by— UHI InauewIme Indoor air ou.jaf'tJ OH1.2 - inadequate ther;riai comfort 0H 1,3 - !:ci°ltac' with moisture OH12 Sanitation An objective of this Cody; is to limit the probability that, as a result of file design or c nstrti" tir,rl of the i w7ding, a p' arsr o in the budaiq! Lvtll oe ex 3os,d ,o .fir: iJs <J ra ta64e risk of illness due to unsanitary conditions, The (ssks of illness due to unslr#itiry ditiilns addfressed in tf-i;.ni Code are those caused by---- OH2.1 e.xposu.re to human.: or drrrrtestic °uJaste H2.2 consumption Of conta",sinated ester n!`12,S - ij adequale facilities for personal hygiene OH2,4 - contact Mthi icoM n?in<ated sur(aczs OHM - colitact vaith. vermin and insecis 20 UH3 Noise protection An this Codc W I's!r?it the orobaiih: ti'tat EF 1 resit t of the o'cSigi` of of the P uit`( inv a pefsoll in the btji u'if`ijj -will be expos'eri to c;ti 'tli'tnicCBLaJI rla of iilrtt ss d`zj# t4 h?pil le"rely of -ound odgi'iaiing if,, adjacent spaces iji the ?!i'd;ng Sei'ii0nce 2,IA.2.t,31 for apiplication lifnitnon;- me risks of illness rice to high eve's :of sounc <.d.fressed in this Code arc tools'; caused big-- 0 2.1 - ' xposure to air btome soli d tmn5mlitied through a sernblies separating dt{F €lfing units° irc n adr a;'em spaces in the &MIJ+n 0144 Vibration and Vetlerhon Limitation An obie,-tnfe of this 00de !s to linlit tite pi ty Ciiai.ssi, filet, S result of li#e design or i`oastruchon of the ?;i,i1d ng. a person in the 4? hiding will he exposed to in unac"ceDiahle risk of il'nass due to hioll l�.vels ji bratlon or deflection of b,Jii'dint aft r#le. ts. OHS 4azardous Substances Containment .n ob ectve of this Code is t':':;nit file probabdity t11at, rill a remelt of the design or construrlio l of Pie i t;tdling. the pubfic "will be exprjse: to art unL ,€_ept;.ble risk of ifineils dLie to the release n' ia7ardous substainces'rcimi the bu,"Ciing "See Samenc:e'2A A2 (y} for appllcatiari fir„itati'ar.. A Accessibility An ub ec'i've of this Code is to lial'R the probability Mat as a result of file de ia,t or construcii€_ n ;, zbe Ldiz3ino", a pe'soii u'tithl a physicai or sensory tire;tat on will be un? icr-epwfy irr#per ed from accassing of usincj the biwitdwg or i ; `'3cilities ;SeF Sertence 2.1.1,2.6) for ap;ii=cation ti�llii2tClfiS'7. Al Accessible Path of gavel Ali obi rtive (A this Code, is to li;fi,t tl e pf balbiflt'v fla', as a result o€ the dosiar or Construction Of the tbvi'iL!"aq, a pptsoii !t a. physi; ai or sansor'y' liiBllWimi dll roe i llact.eptabiy inipedert front accessing the jui.11 rig or circui2filtlq 'I"i8i1111 it (Se: Serlieticr: 2.1.12(5j !Or apf iiration inlitalionsj. W ,accessible Facilities An objecAive of tills Bode is to Uinit the probability, thaf, as a res. It of the design or construction of 'i'r; building, a person =.=,ith a physical or aensory hirniLition ." it be imacceptably impeded firm rising the th-yi i1lgJ ta; Iities (See Seritiml ;e 2.1.1.2,(5) leu ape i?i ration iinlitations;# OP Fire and Struct€rtal Protection of Bulldin s An onierstive t1 this Code is to limit the probabiigy that; as E) 1Osult of tile. design, construction or demolition of the building, like building of ad zceni buildings Mil be. expo';led to an unacceptable risk of damage dua'sn sire or strixtural insufficiency. or the building or ply thereof twill be exposed to an unacceptable risk of toss Of t Se also due to struciitr,al insufficiency, BRITT ISH COLUMBIA BUILDING CODE 2006 Division A - Part 2 OPI fire Protection of the Building An objective of th'is Cc, ie is to limit dhe probabilip', �hat, as F raSoll oi its design or cons trucii0n, lilt "t"I'dov eMble- r s', of damage due v.,M be exposed to an upar1c,p io fi!,P. Trip risks of d','a-raot, -1:Je io fire azd`dressed in MIS Code Ve thOSP C5AL]sed ')P IP'N" Or exploo.W. occur, L ring op'j,^ fire or exPiesion, iripacting areas be.vGrid its point of origin 01.3 collapse, of pbysical elernents due to a fire or explosion OP1,4 - tire spfetv s, vsterris failing trj function as expec'ed OP2 Structural Sufficiency of the Building An objective of this Code is to finiii the prcbability :hat, as a result of its design or construction. 11 btfilalimi c= part thereof vvill be exposed to ail unacceotable rise c;f, damage or loss of use due to stwictu-al faiikire or 1,1,ck of struf"twml -f . he rig.s 01 darnage and ci loss of use clue to structural failure Or WK of structural servicea.bibiy addressed in this Cc�de are those rqt1sed by-- DP211 - loads bearing Jr the Nn7dwg elern.arins ell F1 11 a -, exl."Fed their loadbeafin.,3 cpa-1-1i"y OP2.2 - loads beating w the buildiop, that exceed the ioadbearing picpeMes of the suppor,ing rneillizurn OP2-3 - d;ynaje, to or dFterioition of lw,"Y&ng 6P2,4 - vibralion or defiactmn of bUild"i'79 --n's OP2.5 - instability of the bOldtrqq Or part thereof OP126 - or movement of My sn.pportl-g i rw? di!i rn GP3 Protection of Adjacent Buildings irurn Fire, An objective of Nhis Code is to llnv' *hq p(nnabv1'i�,,j that, as a, re,,iclt ;,,,f th- ldesigr, o� construction of th-c- adja,�erit buddhrig�5 vfll be exposed to an wwceq)table risk of dannage due to fire. The. risks ,)I dainaq�! to adja,-,eni 5v;/(Jtn�.;�s dw� to fif F, addfpssed ill 'hi,, I I Code are ; hosp ca us -ad b— OP3A - fire or explosion Impadtiq areas beyond IN- fh, Of 0'"101 .7 UP 4 Protection of Adjacent Buildings trDin StrUMMI Damage AT! objective of this Code, is to firnit lhe orobability that as a i esult of [> e der5iign, construction or dermolition of the bulldog, adjacent bvijdings ,till be expos-ed to an unaccaptaMp risk of "'t"'Urtural dwriage. T herisks Of struc'ujral d a rn age to adjacent buiid-l', I gs a cldressed in this Code are those caised by — OP41 -- sefflemen', of the medium su.pportina! 0P4.2,, - collapse of the, buiidtrig or ponliop. thereif C ufft 4,,lial-f`f , , , .1 . �l i IDP4,'-- - inrpact of the bodc4lineon I -ijair-em. L;, j,,,i'Z,4jR g S OP4,11 — -,orlapse of the excovafors OPS Protection lit the Building or Facility from Water and Sewage Damage An nbiective Of this Code is to linfli the pro41ab1ily 1hai, as. a (esw, of the dKion or in,.stalia'jor. of the 3,ystew, the 5wfoling or iar�lity ?h:iil b8 expose(J to an i u r, 3,eptable of damage due to the leakage ox sarvil,e teat:'.':. j C,se,vage. 21 '149.IS1-07 Supplement No. 1 to CANICSA-B1 49.Natural gal and propane installation code Januaq 2007 Note. Generof Instructions for CSA Standards are Piow called Updates, Please contact CSA lnfbrmcoiorr Product,, Sales or Visit %qAW.ShopCSA.ca for information about the CSA Standards Update Service. Title: Natural gas and propane installation code— originally published January 2005 The following revisions have been formally approved and are marked by the symbol double delta (AA) in the margin on the attached replacement pages: Revised Contents, Clauses 1.1, 2, 3, 4.11, 4.5.5, 4.9.1, 4.14,6, 4.14,7, 4,16.2, 5.2.1.1, 5,2.1.2, 5.23, 5.5.7, 5,6.1.3, 6,2,17, 6J 6,7, 6.16.8, 6.17.1, 6.17.2, 6.21,11, 6.21.7, 6,22.3, 6.26.1, 7.2, 7.4.4, 7.5,2, 7,26.2, 7.27.3, 8.23, 8.4.3, 84 14.9, 814.12, 8,161, 814.2, Tables 5.2 and C.9, and Annex D New Clauses 6,16.13, 6.16,14, 7.26,7, 7,26.8, 8.9.5, 8.9.6, and 8,21.6 Deleted I Clause 6,25 CAN/CSA-131 49.1-05 originally consisted of 296 pages (xil preliminary and 274 text), each dated January 200S. It now consists of the following pages: January 2005 vii-xii,5-8,11-14,23,24,27,28,37-42,45,46,55-66,69-74,77-80,95-88, ... . . ....... . ..... . 91-94, 97-216, 219-232, and 235-274 January2007 ili-vil 1-4, 9-1 OA, 15-22, 25, 26, 29-36A, 43-44A, 47-54E, 67-69A, 75, 76, 81-84, 89, 90, 95-96A, 217, 218, 233, and 234 • Update your copy by inserting these revised pages. • Keep the pages you remove for reference. Please consult with the appropriate authority having jurisdiction regarding the applicability of this Supplernent. Natural ws and propane installation code This Code applies tothe installation of (a) appliances, equipment, components, andaccessories where gas btobeused for fuel purposes; (b) piping and tubing systems extending from the termination ofthe utility instaHationorfnon-,the distributor's propane tank; (c) vehicle -ref ue|ling appliances and associated equipment meeting the requiraruentsofa general-purpose appliance tmfUianmLuna|-gas-fueUedvehicle; and (d) stationary gas engines and turbines. 1.2 This Code does not apply to (a) marine mpipeline terminals; (b) petroleum refineries; (c) ciaxwhere used aaofeedstock {nchemical plants; (d) utility pipeline distribution and transmission pipelines; (e) storage and handling of liquefied natural gas orunderground renen/oksfo, nmtura>gas" d0 the installation of XGVfuelsystems, containers, and refuelling stations; (g) the storage and utilization mfcompressed natural gas onboats; (h) the installation of vehicle -refuelling appliances when NGV storage containers are installed as part 01 the gatsm/ (i) refrigerated storage orunderground reservoirs for propane; (j) propane used on boats; (k) propane used as a propellant in aerosol containers; (|) butane fuel c*fio«emxof150gcapacity o,|ess;and (nn)the installation ofcontainers and equipment tobeused for propane indistribution locations and filling plants and ontank trucks, tank trailers, and cargo liners. 1.3 Where the term "gas" bused, the requirlements of this Code include, and apply equally to, any ofthe fuDm*ing gases urmixtures nfthem: natural gas, manufactured gas, or mixtures of propane cias and air, propane, propylene, butanes (normal butane or|sobutane),and butylencs. 1.4 This Code and any Standards referenced initdonptmwkeorknply any assurance urguarantee widl respect to the life expectancy, durabjlit� or operating performance of equipment and materials referenced in the [ode. 1.5 The values given in yard/pound units are the standard. This Code contains Sl (rnetric) equivalentsto ywd/pound units so that the Code can be used in SI (,metric) unit5, SI (metric) equivalentSmay be approximate, january2007 No, J to CP'iN11CS i'!5749. t ^4 S., cD Conadior: Natural9as and prgwne installation eerie Chassis -mounted camper --- an accommodation L*dy that attaches onto a true Chassis any; is not; intended for removal, Motorized horse — a vehicular portable structu=`e of self-propelled design. Slide -in camper — an accommodation body that fits into a standard `.vehicle and is designed to be easily removable. Tent gaiter --- a vehicular portable structure built on its own chassis and having a rigid or canvas t+3p and side wa`sis that may be folded or otherwise condensed for transit. "ravel trailer --- a vehicular portable structure intended to be towed by a motor vehicle and that does not fold up or reduce in size for transit. Regulator Appliance regulator — a pressure regulator located in the valve train of an asppliarice. an time pressure regulator — a gas pressure regulator intended for installation in a gas distribution systern between the utility service regulator or 2 psi propane regulator and gas utilization equipment. Lock -up (positive shut-off) ,regulator — a regulator that is capable of maintaining a reduced outlet pressure when the fuel flaw condition is static_ pressure regulator a device, either adjustable or nonadjustable, forcontrolling and maintaining, within acceptabie limits, a uniform outlet pressure. Service regulator---- a pressure regulator installed on a service line to control the pressure of the ryas delivered to the customer. Relief device — a device designed to open to prevent a rise of gas pressure in excess of a specified value due to an emergency or abnormal conditions. Residential appliance — an appliance commonly used in, but not restricted to use in, a dwelling unit. Residential building --- see Building. Safety limit control — a safety control intended to prevent an unsafe condition of temperature, pressure, or liquid level. Safety shut -cuff valve — see Valve. Secondary air -- see Air supply. Semi -rigid connector --- see Connector. Set pressure — the start -to -discharge pressure for which a relief valve is set and marked. Structure — the entire building in which an appliance is installed. Tank (with respect to NGV/propane storage) ._- the class of container for the storage and transportation of gas, designed and fabricated in accordance with CSA 1351. AA Two -stage regulation— a propane gas vapour delivery system that utilizes a first -stage regulator and a second -stage regulator(s), or utilizes an integral two -stage regulator or automatic changeover regulator. January 2007 (Realoces p. 15, Icauary 2005) is 6749,15],0; > Cupodion Srancjod-s 11s"ic>'Jot;1"1117 44r2 Personnel performing instailation, oPeration, and mainter-lance vvcrik, shali be properly trained in such fijnction5. 4.5 Suitability of use 4. 5 , 1. An appliance shall not be installed urdess it is designed for use wilti the tYpe of qas to which it i:4 tc, be connected and is suitable for the pressure, supplied. 4.5.2 The use of an appliance, accessory, component,, equipment, or mateiial shall be prohibited where a hazard is created. 4.5.3 When an appliance is converted from the gas or fuel specified on the rating plate, the conversion shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's certified instructions, If there are no manufacturer's rnstructions for conversion of the appliance, the converted appliance shall be approved, 4.5.4 If an appliance is converted from, one gas to another,. the gas to which it is converted shall be marked or, the appliance rating plate by the fitter making the conversion, Appliances, accessories, components, and equipment that have been exposed to fire, explosion, flood, or other darnacie shall not be offered for sale, installed., reactivated, or reconnected to the suppty until the appliance, accessory component, or equipment has been inspected by a perss.orl acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction. 4.5.6 Aused appliance shall be inspected and determined to be safe for con; nved use by the installer before reconnection to supply piping or tubing. 4.6 Meter and service regulator installations 4A 1 Meter and service regulator instaflations shall be in accordance vvth CSA 662. (See Annex L. 4.6.2 No person other than an employee or person authorized by the supplier n- r clistributor shall perform any alterations, repairs, tests, services, removals, chances, installations, connections, or any other type of work or . the supplier's or distributor's systern. 4.7 Electrical connections and components 4.7.1 Electrical connections between an appliance and buildingwiring shall comply with the local electrical codE or, in the absence of such, with the Conadion Elec(iicul Code, Part I. joa uory 2007 20 (Replaccs p. 20, January 2005) S 1 7 t III o , 7 r o C AINV C S A - PI 49. I - 0 S, Conodion StarHard5 _AsincWlon NoMrmgaarts' propone iosta!lariop CcIde 7.25.6 A swimrnlng pool heater of the finned -tube type shall be installed outdoors or in an enclosure that is not normally occupied and does not directly cornet Unicate with occupied areas. 7.25.7 With price approval of the authority having jurisdiction, when an existing indoor swim niing pool heater is being replaced with a gas -fired swimming pool heater of the finned -tube type and it is neither possible nor practicable to cornply with Clause 7,25.6. a gas -fired swimming pool heater of the finned -tube type may be !installed indoors in the same location as the heater that is being replaced, provided that (a) there is compliance with Clauses 7.25,1 and 7.25.2; (b) any door directly cornmunicating with an area that is normally occupied is equipped with self -closing hardware; and (c) combustion air is supplied frorn the outdoors to the space in villich the heater is located in accordance with Clauses 8.2.4 and 83 or, if applicable, with Clause 8.4. 7.25.8 Where a heater is installed in accordance with Clause 7.25.7, it shall be the responsibility of the owner of the heater to provide maintenance for the heater in accordance with the -uanufacturer's instructions,, but in no case less than once annually. 7.25.9 An outdoor swimming pool heater shall he installed so that the flue discharge is in accordance with Clause 8. 14.10, 7.26.1 A water heater, unless of the direct -vent type, shall not be installed in a bathroom, bedroom, or any enclosure where sleeping accommodation is provided. 7.26.2 The temperature and pressure relief device on a tank type water heater or the pressure relief device orovided for in instantaneous (' tankless) water heater shall have a discharge pipe of a size at least equal to the nominal size of the device o'utlet. The discharge pipe shall teniiinate not more than 12 in (300 mm) above the floor. 7.26.3 An instantaneous -type (tankless) water heater, unless certified for installation on a combustible wall, shall be provided with appropriate protection as specified Table 41. Such protection shall extend the full length and width of the heater and its draft hood. 7.26.4 Except where permitted by Clause 4,13.2, the minimum clearance from combustible material for an underfired storage -type water heater shall be 2 in (50 mm), and the minimum clearance for any other type ofvvater heater shall be. 6 in (15(t mm). See also Clause 4.14.2, 7.26.5 A direct -vent water heater shall have a minimum access clearance of 3 ft (900 mm) on the burner side. /anuary 2007 (Replaces P. 67 january 2005) 67 N Coaoalion Ela .trlcal Code, Part f Q 13 Y Section 2 --- General Rules a dinh .as ative 2-000 Authority for Rules By virtue of the authority vested in the inspection department, this Code has been .-adopi_aci and the inspection department hereby orders and directs its observance. Sections devoted to Rules governing particular types of installations are not interided' to embody all Rules gov:_rnint these particular types of installations, but cover only thou e special Rules or regt€Ir€tinr,s thzi. add to or arnend those prescribed in other sections covering installations € nder ordinary conditions. 2-004 Permit Electrical contractors or others responsible for carrying out the work shall obtain a permit from the Inspects �r department before commencing work with respectto insW, lation, alteration, repair, orextension cat any electrical equipment _ c°, 7_006 Application for inspection An application for inspection shall be filed with the inspection department on a forrn pro,,Ided by the latter at the time the permit is obtainers, 2_008 Fees Fees for the permit and inspection in accordance with the schedule prescribed by the inspection department shall be paid at the time the permit is obtained. 2-010 Posting of permit A copy of the permit sM9 be postecl In a compic€.€ous place at the work site and shall not be removed until the inspection is cornpleted. 2-012 Natifrt.cati.on of inspection The inspection depart Went shall be notified in writing by the electrical cont€-actor that viork is ready for inspection at such time(s) allowing inspection before any work or portion of work is cc teemed. ... . s;" 2-014 darns and specifications :Tans and specifications in duplicate or in greater number if required by the inspection department (one copy to -' be retained by the inspection department) shall be submitted by the owner or an agent to, and acceptance obtained f,orn, the inspection department before work is commenced on (a) 'airing installations of public buildings, incdustrial establishments, factories, a€ d other buildings in Which public safety is involved; €.;b) Earge light and power installations and the installation of apparatus such as generators, transformers, switch. boards, large storage batteries, etc., or (c) such otfPer installations as may be prescribed by the inspection department, 2-016 Current -permits Except as provided in Rule 2-018, no reconnection; installation, .alteration, or addition shall be connected to any service or other source of electric energy by a supplyd authority, electrical contractor, or other person, until a current-perrinit authorizing the supply of electric energy has been obtained from the inspection department. 1 c• 2-018 Reconnection A supply authority shall not requite a current -permit for reconnection in cases where the service has been CLOT Off for non-payment of bills or a change of occupant provided that them have been no alterations or additions subsequent to the issuance of the l?5t current -permit. 2-020 Reinspection The inspection department reserves the right to reinspect any installation if and when it considers such action to be necessary. 2-022 Renovation of existing installations The inspection department may require such changes as may be necessary to be made to existing installations where, through hard usagp, wear and tear, or as a result of alterations or extensions, dangerous conditions have developed. 12 rc) Canocfrotr Standards Association Section 2 r 2-024 USee of approved equipiment (sce .Appendix Al Electrical rt:ii_lii:3r3�r§f, U`rtCi lil tiler .riilai instctlii:'et#on-;',%�ithin the �isll tii[I!C i l of theinspection departrnent shall tie ar3 Z?^:.' li and shall be of i kind :Jr t'y'pL a;).atiylg aiii)r a1 C'd (or the siaecl'IC. iJtkr(?€3; € °r 1ti�IC I t 1s I:7 IJt'. employed. tyi-e;"9 t"7i3t=gi1 q(>i:3"c�:•iai t33S- Pre'uia:7l15fV ?ia'en C rrarii2E�, tni' €rlSpect.ion department ma"', reject, at any lime, ally electricai ecat 6pnnent under ar ry of the loflowing conditions. :tie_ equj1 i1-IH- -i, i s subSe`andard vVith reSper: to , lJ-e Sample fail vvllich appros:al bva3 , g` anLfeci; (I-,) th& conditions of use I1 dicalle that the equipment is not s"itable; of t,h : terms of the approval agreeP.-Eent are not iJing cairintA Ciil`.. 2-022-8 Avaltaffifity of ssork fOv iUspCcti011 t c� << ,c�!4c ai work, shall be rendered ii�ac;cessible by lathing, bciard;ilg, car otilet building ;�; ec?n: t.ructiLasl uriti9 it has beer, accented by the inspectivi department. 6 Y- 3o t)eviati.on or postiaQnemenJt y c ill anyLase ,'rFl"fete deviation C r l3C StponE;iiler:t of these Rules and regulatic s is nec-ssary, special pea nissiori Small be obtained before proceeding with the wff A, but this special permission shall apply only to tale particular ins. AllaLion for vgrl h it is given. 2-032 Damage. and interference n) c, peryrn shall damage any electrical Mstailation or co ponera. ihemol- t2`) ,io person shall interfere `with any electrcai instai`saticari or c0n`9 "!E`rlt thereof except that vvhen, in the course Qj asterailol`i, or repairs to nc,En-electriCal e+Jiprnent. Gar : TYUCtUres, It rifa"y' be S[Ct-ssary, to disconnect C)r iTu)ve conlpone€1ts of an eir'Lti'ical installation, it si'lrzil'be the fet Pi)i'is'I✓ilitt/ of the �3el soil LaTT4 iTig otit ?i3e aiterati^ns or ref`Balrs to vr'MkJr e that the ele! trical inlstallaidon is rc shred to a 53f e ope rating condition as Boor as a..l Ee vogFes£. of zhe aalteratior6 or repairs permits. Te'.Chflical 2- 0 liar ing ofequipment isee Appendix Ili ? ach piece o—i electi` cal equipment shall bear those of the a`olld3wiriCj f"i;ar irfgS necessary to identify the ertl.<irwner".. and ensa.Jre that it is suitable forthe particular installation: ( t) the rr,i�,ker'.S name, trai�e iark, or other i`eCv rlic:.PfJ S;'tllbo! of id�1"ltif#cali3n; fb) cau'logue nurs ber or type; voitage; (:1,? ra9 ed ➢:ad i#fii'lpeieS; (r Witis, vtai" amperes, or horse,=povver; t'F> whether for rc, dc, or both; ,9) number of phases; ,Pl_i fi-k uenct� in n�rt<; 9,, rated ioad spee-d in revolutions per i�fiifuie; i.) dig`.#i�lr`Erition of 1.efrlirals; ilia) wi-j .-.then for contlnuous or interniii_Lent chat;: 0=s:ideflce of approval; c)r (r -,) other €-narkings necessaji to ensure save and proper operion. ( fi) At. the me of inStaliation, each seriice box shall lie marked in a cold>p;ciaf�us, legble, and perrnanent nnanner, to indicate clearly the niaxil'num r.,tirig of the overc.urretlt de0ce that may be used for this ins"011ation. (3) At ea&i distribution point, &C.Uit bTe«lterS, fuses, and switches shall be marked, a::jace'nt thereto, in a 1-01ispicuvus ails: legi":ie maoiaer to indicate -clearly (a) which installation of portion of ins alaation that they protect or Control, and tbF the -maximum rating of ouercurrent device that is permitted. (4) fhe marking on electrical Lguip#l�ient shall not be added to, or cllang�d, to indicate a use under this Code for which the has not heerl apprc`aved. 13 ? Cartcrdion S,artcfrrd.. Association si�cdolt 2 Genel-0 Rulv; it. .i 11 tc� rech. I .,er to ILItUai heating of adjacent condiuctors or cables or ced heat dfiss i pation through the thermal insulation; (b,, if the spac2 is to be filled with a loos _YN - inrl material that is non -corrosive, fire -resisting, and, non -condo. and that is in "Ornplian,-e with the Notlonol Building Code of Canodq. any type of willing system recoclnized by this Code shall be permitted to be used, but special care shall be taker to enSUre that therevAH be no strain on the conductors Cue to the welght or pressure of the insulating batts or rigid sheets, is installed prior to the ,c) if the thermal insulation material, in the form of of .. on the installation of the vfiring and secured in place so that, '-there will be no undue pressule conductors, no soecial precaution need be obsewed; (d) if thermal insulation made of or faced with meal is installed, the wiring shall conform -,.a the f+�Ilowing: a 25 rnm separation shall be provided between the thermal insulation and the kno'FD -and-tube wiring; and (i i) nai- metallic -sheathed cable may be in contact with the Insulation; and (e,�) mineral-ins;iated cable oralurninum-sheath&d cable shall not be used with types of thermal ' - , action on the sheath. insulation that. are liable to have a corrosive (21, Thermal insulation material shall not be sprayed or otherwise introduced into the interior of outlet boxes, junctian boxes, or enciosures No other electrical equipment. 2-124 Fire spread (see AI)pendices B and G ' i I ) 'Electriud installations shall be made so that the probability of spread of fire through firestopped partitions, floors, hollow spaces,, firewalls or fire partitions, vertical shafts, or ventilating or air-conditioning ducts is reduced Lo a minimum. wherea fire separation is pierced by a raceway or cable, any openings, around the raceway or cable shall be properly Closedor seated in Compliance- with the Natiorol Buddir'9 Code of Canada. o 2-126 Flame spread requirements for electrical wiring and cables (see Appendices B a ne-, G) Electrical %,viring and cables installed it-) buildings shall meet theflarne spread requirements of the National Budding, Code of Canada or local building legislation. 4_r 2-128 `lame spread requirentents for totally enclosed -inetallic race -ways 'see non Appendices B and G) Totally enclosed non-metallic raceways installed in buildings shall meet the flaine.spread requirements of the No' ionai Building Code of Conado, uirements isee Appendix B-t 2-130 Sunlight resistance req Insuiated electrical wiring and cables and totally enclosed non-inetallic raceways installed and used where exposed to direct rays of the sun shall be specific -ally approved for the purpose and be so marked. 2-132 Insulation integrity 11see Appendix B.) All vAring shall be installed so that, when completed, the systernwill bm e free froshort-circuits and frrx m grounds except as, permitted in Section 10. 2-134 Use of ground fault circuit interrupters Ground fault circuit interrupters shall be permitted as supplementary protection from shock, hazard but shall not be used as a substitute for insulation or grounding except as permitted by Rules 10-408(4) and 26-700t 8). Protection of persons and property 2-200 General ision is inade for the safety Of persons Electrical equipment shall be installed and quarried so that adequate provan and property and for the protection of the electrical equipment from mechanical ital or other injury to which it', liable to be exposed. 2-202 Guarding of bare live parts (1) Bare live parts shall be guarded against accidental contact by means of approved cabinets or other form.3 of approved enclosures except where the bare live, parts are located in -,a suitable room, VaUlt, or similar enclosed area that is accessible only to qualified persons; or 0 Canadion Standards Association is i.„orlodia() !"iCac Ica,' Cr3il�C'., 'IrL i:, a s permitted elsewhere b y this Code. (r_) %°Vhere electrical equipment has mounted or, it, vritl?in 9C',O r m of l)ar li*` parts, €3 377-ei^Ct ifal components that require serocing by unqualified persons, suit. ble l arri-ers or Lovers shall be p wided fo, the mare live parts. (:3) Entrances to rooms and other cluarded locations containing exposed bare liv- ;:,,arts sfi;alp be raarkedr with conspicuous warning sitar is forbidding entry to r€nq u,raiitiers f;ersons, Maintenance and operation 2-300 General requireamaenu for inaintenance and operation (1) Ail operating electrical equipment shall be kept in safe an.cl proper working cvEndption. (2) Do_trical equipment rnaintained for emerqe; cy service shall be paeriedically ansf*cted and tersted as ne ces5ary to ensure its fitness for service. (3) ln9reguent_fy used electrical e:guipment maintained foi future service shall he thurou(Di ly inspected before use in order to determine its fitness for service. (4) Defect;,ve equipment ;hail either be put in good carder or permanently disconnected, 2-302 Maintenance in hazardous locations In locations where explosive or f lammable materials or gases ate present, special precautions shall be observed as fc,llo✓✓c: (a) repairs or alterafions shall not be made on any live equipment; and (b) fits or seals in enclosures shall be rrnaimtained in their original fafe condition. 2-304 Disconnection 1) No repairs or alterations shall be cta ried cut on anv live equipi-nent except where complet`° disc_onnrecticm of the equipment is not practicable. (2) Three-way or T-OW-vray switches shall not be considered as disconnecting means. {3) Adequate precautions, such as locks on circuit breakers or switches, warning notices, sentries, or other equally effective means, shall be taken to prevent elec dral equipment from being electrically charged when work is being done. A 2-3 6 Shock and flash protection tree ,�p;��:a� fig ) Electrical equipment such as switchboards, f"apelboards, indlusidai control panels, €peter socket enclosures, and iraotor control centres that are installed in other than dwelling units acid arc likely to rerjuire examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized shall be field. marked to vwarn perso^s ot potential electric shock and arc flash hazafds. !2) the marking ieferred to in Subrule N) shrill be located so that it is clearly vLibie t:c, persons before exl-Imination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance of the equipment. 2-308 Working space around electrical equipment (') A minimum working space of I m with secure footing shall be provided and maintained about electrical equipment such as switchboards, pa€-iell7o ard.,,, caritrol panels; and motor central centres trust are enclosed in metal, except that working space is not required behind such equipment where there are no renewable parts such as fuses or switches on the batik and where all connections are accessible from locations r)ther than the back. The space referred to in Subrule (1) shall be in additicn to the space required for the operation of di aw- out-type equipment in either the connected, test, or fully disconnected position and shall be, s€ufficient for the opening of enclosure doors and hinged panels to at lirast.W. (:�) Working space with secure footing not less than that specified in Table 5E shall be provided and maintained around electrical equipment Such as swit:chboaids, control panels, :and rotor control ceni.res having exposed live parts. (A) The minimum headroom of working spaces around svAtclibyards or motor contful centres where bare live arts ;are exposed at any time shall be 2.2 n;. 2-310 Entrance to, and exit from, working space (see hppendix B) (1) Each roorn containing electrical equipment and each working sl_3ace. r ~Dund equipment shall haste suitable means of egress, which shall be kept clear of all obstructions. (2) Where a room or space referred to in Subrule (1) contains equipment that is rated 1200 :A car more, or rated over 750 V, and consists of transformers, overcurrena devices, switchgear, or disconnecting means, such equipment shall be arranged so that, in the event of a failure in the. equipment, il: shall be possible to leave. the: room or space referred to in Subrule (1) without passing the failure point, except that where this cannoi 16 It)Ccroodicin Stc`aI7Caids A55ociotion Appendix I Plumbing/Gas Inspection Report SUBJECT: 11701`11709.11715& 11 1723FRASERSTREET (NORTHUMBERLANDCOURT) DATE: 16FEBRUARY2009 Following is a|ist ofthe relevant 8/C Plumbing Code and Natur8|Gas and P/opaneinstallation Code compiled during osafety inspection onUnits 5'2O.117O1/11TDQ/1i715/11723Fraser Street excluding the interior ofunit 1Q(access was not available) du/ingthe week CfFebruary 1Othto12m 2008. The iterns identified are currently in violation of the aforementioned documents under enforcement within the district asthey relate to plumbing and gaS installations. These items are ones that deal with the health and life safety of the building occupants only and are required to be repaired iothe satisfaction nfthese enforce montdncunnents. The first portion identifies the re|mvan1documents and sections for compliance. This isfollowed Uy identifyingtheunitnnndtheinfnactionpcontainedthmroinwithopictuvenumbe/ehemdofthe identified infraction which illustrates the infr8cti0n. These findings a\so do not deal with current Plumbing and Gas Code requirements where there is no issue in respect of the health or safety of the building or its occupants, B/�Building Code 2008 Division A - Part - 0h]eCtiveS OH2S8Oit@tio0 An objective of this Code is to limit the probability that, as a result of the design or uonatruodonofthebui}d|nQ,spensoninthebui|dinQwiUbeexpooeUt0anunaooepteb|eriok of illness due to insanitary conditions. The risks of illness due to unsanitaryConditions addressed in this Code are those caused by - 01-12,1- exposure tohuman ordomestic waste Division B. - Part 7 - Plumbing Services Clause�1��1�h) The correction nfanunsafe condition inor about any building SentemceT.1.2'1.(1) Every sanitary drainage systern shall be connected to a public sanitary sewer, a p,,Ablic combined sewer or a private sewage disposal system. Qualified Personnel - Persons Performing Plumbing Wo,rk Son1ence 7.2'4.1.(l) At-fittingshall no'., be used in a drainage sys"Lem, exceptto connect a vent pipe Article 7.2.5.12. Plastic Pipe, Fittings and Solvent Cement Used inBuildings Sentence7�-1O.18.(1) Air admittance valves shall conform to ASSE 1051, ind'vidual and branch type air admittance valves for sanitary drainage system, o Sentenca7.3.4.5.(1) Nominally horizontal pipingthat is inside a building shall be braced to prevent swaying and buck||Dgand t0control the effects Ofthruat. Sentence7.8.1T.(B) Avauuuno+eiiefvalve shall beinstalled when any tank may be subject tVhmok' siphonaga .1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code and SUpPerneDLNo.1B14Q.1S1, O7 4.5.5 4pp0onoe, accessories, components and equipment that have been exposed tofire, explosion, flood, orother damage shall not beoffered for sale, installed, re -activated 0[reconnected tQthe supply until the appliance, accessories, components orequipment has been inspected byeperson acceptab|etothe authority haxfngjurisdiwtion. 7.2&2 The temperature and pressure relief device onotank type water heater or the pressure relief device provided for eDinstantaneous (tanNoss)water heater shall have a discharge pipe of a size at least equal to the nominal size ofthe device outlet. TheOisohaUge pipe shall terminate not more than 12iO (30Omnn)above the floor. The following hsalist nfeach unit with picture numbers identifying the relevant code infraction and the corresponding infraction. TheSe items | consider t0beCfhealth and life safety concerns inaccordance with the objectives of the B.C. Plumbing Code and Natural Gas and Propane installation Code and would require upgrading tobeincompliance with the 8.C.Plumbing Code and Natural Gas and Propane installation Code. #1 Furnace was not ope, ation8|and is unsafe and must be repaired or replaced Clause 4�.5. #2 Plumbing, sanitary piping under sink was badly leaking. Note: see code reference 01-112.1&OH2.4. Clause 1-111.(1)(h) #3 Top element nnhot water tank was riot working, not supplying proper not water to UNIT 6 Me UNIT #4 Drain frorn sink running into main sewage line. Connection allows possible flow of human s waste into drain pipe. See code reference OH2.1, Sentence '7.2.4.1.(1) #5 Silicone, was used to seal leaking,ioints under sink. Note: see code reference OfH2.1: Clause 1.1.1,1.(1}(h), article 7.1.4.1., article 7.2.5,12. #7 Furnace was not operational and is unsafe and must be repaired or replacer_! Clause 4.5.5.. #8 Sanitary piping was.cracked and repair was attempted using improper materials as such sewage is still leaking into the building and is must: be repaired. See OH2.1, 7.1.4.1. and 7.2.5.12. #J Improper installation of hot water heater. see cede reference 7.26.2, #10 pl=urr,bing fitting was cracked along building drain which also serves units 5 and 6. Repaired was attempted with non -compliant materials. Note: see cede reference 1,1.1.1.(1}(hl, Article 7.1.4.1., Articie 7.2.5.12. 31 furnace was not operational and is unsafe and must be repaired or replaced Clause - 12 allows sewer gases to vent into unit. See cone reference 7.2.10.16(1} #1 S configuration will allow contamination of domestic water supply. See code reference 7.6 L7.(8) #15 Non -approved fitting were used to hot water tank. Configuration will allow contamination of domestic water supply. Note. see code reference 7.6.1.7.(8) #16 Furnace was not operational and is unsafe and must be repairedd or replaced Clause #17 Dion -approved fitting were used to hot water tank. Configuration will allow contamination of domestic water supply, See cede references 7.26.2. and ~° 18 Electrical tape was used to stop basin leak which is not an approved method. See code reference OH2.4 UNIT 10 #1Q_ Piping from kitchen sink was leaking so a rag was used to stop the leak, not an approved method. See code reference OH2.4, article 7.1.4.1., Article 7.2.5.12, #20 Non -approved fitting were used to hot water tank. Configuration will allow contarination of domestic water supply. See code references 7,26.2. and 7.6.1.7.(8). UNIT 1121 #21 plumbing sanitary piping is leaking in crawlspace and collecting an p;astic tarp. See code reference OH2,1, OH2A J1)(h), Article- 7.1.4.1., Article 7.2.5.12. #22 Non -approved fitting were used to hot water tank. Configuration will allow contamination of don-lestic Ovate , supply. See code references 7.26.2. and '7.6.1.7,(8).. UNF 12 #25 Furnace was working but missin'd front cover and c-vent was rusting out at bottom which overtime will allow leakage of flue gasses into the unit. See code reference Clause 4.5.5. UNIT 13 ,126 Furnace was not operational and is unsafe and rnust be repaired or replaced. See code reference Clause. 4.5,5. UNIT 14 #27 Non -approved fitting were used to hot water tent;, Configuration will allow contamination of domestic water supply. See code references 7.26.2. and .6.1. i. (8). UNIT 15 #29 laundry tub in crawispace set up to train into floor drain in crawispace. See code reference 7.1.2.1.(1) -430 Non -approved fitting were used to hot water tank. Configuration will allow contamination of domestic water supply. See code references 7.26-2. and 7.6.1_7.(8). U.N.1116 #33 Non -approved fitting were used to hot water tank. Configuration will allow contamination of domestic water supply. See code references 7.2-6.2. and T&L7.(8), UNIT17 #3 5 Furnace was not operational and is unsafe and must be repaired or replaced. See code reference Clause 4.5.5. #36 Non-app,oved fitting were used to hot water tank, Configuration will allow con'tarnination of domestic water supply. See code references 7,26.2. and UNIT18 #317 Sanitary sewer improperly graded. See code reference 01-12.11, OH2,4, 7.3.4.5(1) 1138 P Non -approved fitting were used to hot water tank. Configuration will allow contamination of domestic water supply. See code references 7.26.2. and 7.6.1.7.(8). UNIT 19 No Access MMHMI #39 Non -approved fitting were used tDhot water tank. Configuration will aUow contamination ofdomestic water supply. See code re[ensnoes7.2O2.and 7.8.1.7.(8`. Note, All tuio dIverters are located in the units fire separation and due to iruroper maintenance and care The items identified for each of the units are items that do not comply with the cccles Objective Statements for life and health safety and are required to be upgracled to ensure compliance with the B.C. PIUmIk-jing Code and NatUral Gas and Propane installation Code and to ensure the health and safety of the occupants in the buildings. These are items that if |eftunnepainsd could further enhance the uninhaNtab|e state of nnajuMt�o�ih��u��|nqu�edon. / -.~— ` - N Zezchuk Plumbing Inspector,/Gas Safety Officer Appendix 11 Electrical Safety Officer TO: 8TEPHENJ. 0K FROM: PAULKELLY SUBJECT: 117O'�...1-17O9.11715&11723FRASERSTREET (NORT�UMBERL4NDCOURT) Following ks@list Cfthe relevant code rules the Canadian Electrical Code, Pail 12006 edition found by the Districts Electrical Safety Officer that are currently in violation of the codes Linder enforcement within the district asthey relate Electrical Safety. The list identifies the relevant code nuke,a brief description of the rule, the units inviolation nfthe rules and the pictures that demonstrate the infraction. These infractions deal with life safety issue to occupants of these units as'-theydmnot comply with the standards of maintenance established by this Code and must be brought up to the current editionoft! mCanadian Electrical Code. These findings also donot deal with current E|ectz|caiCode requirements where there is no issue in respect of the life safety of the building or its occupants: Rule 2-004 Permit: Electrical contractors Q[others responsible fo) carrying out the work shall obtain apermit frorn the inspection department before commencing work with respect to installation, alteration, repair orextension ofany electrical equipment, ^ Units - 5,& 7.8, 10' 13, 14, 16, 17and 18.(Fqctures: :L9,41. 86, 135, 189) Note: No recent permits were taken out fOr electrica I alterations to these units. Fire Spread: Where afire wmpnratimnispierced byaraceway orcable, any opening around the raceway or cable shall be properly closed or sealed in compliance with the National Building Code of Canada. Note: CATV cables run between units 18share a TV signal have penetrate,,-" Tkde 2-20K0 General: Electrical equipment shall be installed and guarded so that adequate provision is made for the safety of persons and property and for the proLection of the electricai equipment fro0mechanical Or other injury tOVvhiCh|tiSUab|e10 be exposed, m Units- 5, 0.7.8. 10' 11, 13, 14, 151,1 8, 17end 18(Piotures:89, 99, 128) Note: Guards Rule 2-20%2 Guarding of bare live Qarts� 8ana live parts shall be guarded against electrical contact by means of approved cabinets or other fo.rms of approved ericlosures. � Units - 5. 8, 7.8. 10, 11, 13' 14, 15` 16and 17 (Pictures.- 29. 43, 45) Note: Bare live terminals have been exposed as a resuft of rer-noving cover plates from hlot wa1ertank000dpano!cove ns. Rule 2-300 General requirements for maintenance and operation: All operating electrical equipment shall be kept insafe and proper working condition. Electrical equipment maintained for emergency service shall be periodically inspected and tested as necessary to insure its fitness for service. Defective equipment shall either be put in good order or permanently disconnected. * Unite - 5. 6.8. 13end 16(Pintunes:5'39.44) Note: Smoke detectors have been removed in most units.: eqUilornent is not safe after the covers have been removed. Rule 2�310 Entrance to, and exit from, working space: Each room containing electrical equipment end each working space around equipment sha!l have suitable means of egress, which shall bekept Clear ofall obstrucUons. w Common property Note: Three ofthe four electrical closets housing the electrical meters could not bareadily accessible due to the amount of storage blocking the doorway. RuleL2-312Accessibility for maintenance: Passageways and working space around electrical equipment shall not beused for storage and shall bekept clear ofobstructions and arranged togive authorized persons ready access to all parts requiring attention. � Common Property Note: Electrical Rooms in Buildings 11701, 11709 and 11723. Rule 12-018 Entry of raceways and cables into buildings: Holes in ouLer walls or roofs of buildings through which raceways or cables pass shall be filled to prevent infiltration of moisture. Common Property al. buildings Note: Uabieviaion and communication cables throughout, Types of conductors: Conductors installed inany location shall be suitable for the cond'tion of use as indicated in Table 19 fCanadian Electrical Code, page 304. ) for the particular |oca1ion involved and with particular respect to (a) moisture; (b)corrosive action; (c)tamperatuoy; (d) degree ofenclosure ; and (e) mechanical protection. � Units - 5, 0, 71.8, 10. 13 and 17(Piciuren: 19. 57,75. 168) Note: Cables on the exterior of the buildings are not approved for such use. Also, some cables used inalterations were undersized. Rule. 12-120 Supporting of conductors: Conductors shall hesupported aothat nndamaging strain iaimposed onthe terminals ofany electrical apparatus ordevices oronjoints ortaps. w Units - 5. G, 7, 8, 10, 11' 12. 13` 14, 15. 16' 17. 18and 20(Pictunes: 10' 11, 95, 147) Note: Some cables were damaged due to the removal of supporting straps resulting in |nsu|ationbreakdown and exposed live conductors. Rule 121-302 Types of conductors: Conductors shall be of types suitable for exposure to tile weather osindicated inTable I 9. � Units -6.1Uand 17(Pictures:81,167`1O8) NcteSorne of the exterior cables for the exterior. ights are not approved 411,.;r such use. Method of installation: Where non-nietallic-sheathed cable is run in proximity toheating sources, transfer ofheat Lothe cable shall beminimized bymeansofanair space ofet least 25mmbetween the conductor and heating ducts and piping, � Units - G, 10, 18(Hntur85:26. 27. 77. 140) Note: Cables must not be in direct contact with heating ducts, combination of heat from duct and cable may cause melting of the insulation. Rule 12-506(5) Method of installation: NotwithstmndingSub'nu|e (4),ethenna| barrier conforming to the requirements of the National Building Code of Canada or local building legislation shall be permitted to be installed between the conductor and heating sources to maintain ambient temperature ofthe conductor atnot more than 30degrees C. Units -1-;'6,1D.13and 16 Note, Insulation may be used to separate, cables from heating ducts. Rule 12-510 Running of cable between boxes and Where the cable isrun between boxes and fittings, it shall be supported by straps or other devices located within 300mrn of every box or fitting and atintervals ofnot more than 1,5meters throughout the run. � Units - 5, 0, 7, 8, 8, 10, 13. 14, -18. 17. 18and 20 (Piotores:41, 95. 147, 150) Note- Straps and, supports are missing throughout. Rule 12-518 Protection for cable iPexposed installations: Cables used inexposed wiring shall be adequately protected against mechanical damage where itpasses through a floor, where itksless than 15meters above afloor, orwhere itiaexposed tomechanical damage, Units - 7, 13anU 17 (Picture: 182) NotH�Where any cables are exposed Onthe surface (and within 1.5meters ufthe floor) they must beprotected against mechanical damage, such as armoured mab|eorinstalled in conduit. Rule 12-101,0(3d Outlet box supports: Boxes and fittings shall be firmly secured Unstuds, joists, or similar fixed structural units other than wooden, metal, or composition lath, in accordance with this rule. Boxes, cabinets and fitting supports: Boxes, cabinets and fittings shall be fastened securely inplace. w Units -5'6,7'8,13'14.1G.17.18and 20(9|ctunas:37,i13,16S) Rule 12-3016(21 Flush boxes, cabinets and fittings: Gaps oropen spaces inplaster surfaces ofwalls Orceilings shall be filled inaround the front edges ofboxes, cabinets and fK�ngs. p UHha - 5. 8, 117 13, 14, 15, 16 and 18 (Pictures: 48' 88, 108, 119, 149) Entrance of conductors into boxes, cabinets and fittings: Where conductors pass through tne walls of boxes, cabinets ot-fittings, provision shall be rnade to (a) protect the insulation on ihe oonduotonsfnom injury. * Units - 5. 8, 7,8, J-3, 14, 17, 18and 2O(Pictures:37.43.86^ 113, 142, 140) Note: Some of the cable connectors are either |OOSe o; nonexistent causing breakdown in Protect term inaIcon neotons from mxterne|atnain. Wires are improperly c|anopedtoelectrical boxes ursupporting weight. a This issue iscommon toall units. Rule 12-30220 Where non-me1oUic-sheathedcable entersebox, cabinet orfitting, ebox connaCtoceither eaaseparate device designed for use with such cable oresPart of' the box, cabinet or fitting, shall be usedto secure the cable in place adequately and without iijuryto the conductors. Units - 5, 13,20(Pic1Vnes: 88, 174, 175) Note: Must use connectors for all cables entering boxes. Rule 12-302aZC Where a rigid orflexible metal conduit, electrical metallic tubing, orarmoured cable eners boxes, cabinets or fittings, it shall be secured in place in accordance with the requirements nfSection 10. � Unita- 5, 7, 8` 13 and 18(P|ctunsa: 10, 38, 37.43.97. 142, 150) Note: Proper cable or conduit fittings must be used for connection and support. Rule 12-3028 Multi outlet assemblies: Multi outlet assemblies shall not boused inany b8thn}OnO,kitChen`oranyp|8oewheoetheaSsemb|ywou|UbeSubieCtLVmechan|ca|ip]ury. � Unhm7.1Uand 17(Pictunea:38,79,158) Note: Extension cords and power bars in various locations. Rule 14-108"(2) Enclosure ofVvercUrrent devices: Operating handles of circuit breakers shaU be made accessible without opening any door or cover giving access to live parLs. Unitq- - 5and 8(Rcturea 15, 45) Note: Panel covers missing. Rule 30-300 Live parts: Luminaries, |aDlpholders and associated equipment shall bginstalled So that nOlive part |Sexposed tOcontact while they are inuse. ^ Unity - 5' 6,778' 13, 14, 15, 16und 17 (Ficturen:0'14-29-B1-128) Note! Live parts exposed due tomissing cover p1ateo,light fixtures disconnected from mountin;9 boxes, some cables have been stripped inorder tntap off power, and this is extremely dangerous. Rule 30--302-LJ- Supporkm Every |uminereshall bosecurely supported. * Units -5.13'14and 17(Picturea:17.Q8,1O0) Rule 30-3U04 Outlet boxes to be covered: Every outlet box used with lighting equiprilent shall be provided with a cover orcovered by luminai/e-canopy, outlet -box type |uminaive. orother device. � Units - 5. 6' 7,8. 10' 11. 13. 14, 15, 16, 17,ond 20(Piotures 12, 40, 101' 177) Note: Many boxes donot have alight fixture attached; also junction boxes donot have any blank cover plates. Rule 30-314 MO!n|DlU7M height Cflow |urOiD8|rgS:VVhona a rigid |urnin@ir8 is located at a height of less than 2.1 meters above the floor and is readily accessible, the luminaire shall be prOtected from mechanical iojuMbya. guard orbv|ncatnn. Units -7.17'l8and 2Q(Fqc1ures 33.165'175) Note: All crawJspace light fixtures to be guarded, no exposed larnps be,ow 2.1 meLers. Note: Out of forty eight smoke detectors installed |n2007there were only seven remaining. The items ident;5edfor each ofthe units are items thatUonot comply with the codes Objective Statemrient for life safety by adhering to the standards of maintenance of electrical equipment and are required to be upgraded toensure compliance with the Canadian Electrical code, Part 12000. Due Uothe non compliant itenoo|istedabove there is aserious potential for injury toperson residing inurattending this property by direorcontact nrthrough fire. Paul Kelly Appendix B (March 9, 2009) Interoffice MAPLE RIDGE 61 alsti Cuiurnoia TO: BROCK MCDONALD, DIRECTOR LICENCES, PERMITS AND BYLAWS FROM: DANE SPENCE, FIRE CHIEF/DIRECTOR COMMUNITY FIRE SAFETY SUBJECT: 11701, 11709, 11715, AND 11723 FRASER STREET (NORTHUMBERLAND COURT) DATE: MARCH 9, 2009 Summary A fire and life safety inspection was completed on units 5-20 11701, 11709, 11715, and 11723 Fraser Street excluding the interior of unit 19 (access was not available) during the week of February 10th to 12-1" 2009. These inspections were performed in conjunction with inspectors from the District of Maple Ridge Building Inspection Department. Written notification of the inspection was provided to the owners of each unit, and on the day of the inspections, occupants of the individual suites granted the inspection team access to the interior of the units. The following code violations were found and referenced in the applicable sections of the B.C. Fire Code, 2006 edition. I will explain the context and relevance of each code violation; followed by outline of the code infractions found in each residential unit, referenced to photographs where applicable and a brief explanation of a prescribed remedy. The deficiencies that have been outlined in this report will have to be addressed in order to provide for a basic level of fire and life safety for the occupants of these units. It is my opinion that these remedial repairs should be undertaken as quickly as possible as the use and occupancy of many of these units increases the likely hood and severity of a fire that will have devastating consequences. Fire code infraction and relevance to inspection findings., Absence of smoke alarms. Almost all of the units inspected were found to be without any working fire detection system required for basic life safety that would warn the occupants in the event of a fire. B.0 Fire Code 2.1.3.3.states Smoke alarms shall be installed in conformance with CAWULC-S533, `installation of smoke alarms . ............ note: the referenced standard includes the requirement to test and maintain the smoke alarms. Damaged or missing fire separations Manv of these units were found to have damaged fire separations that are required to help prevent the horizontal and vertical spread of fire. These separations also provide thermal protection to the structural elements of the building. Section 2.2.1.1.(3) of the BC Fire Code provides: Rooms, corridors, shafts and other spaces shalt be separated where practicable by fire separations conforming to the British Columbia Building Code. Furthermore section 2.2.1.2. 1) provides: Where fire separations are damaged so as to affect their integrity, they shall be repaired so that the integrity of the fire separation is maintained. Electrical related fire safety issues Most of the issues surrounding electrical fire safety issues in these units center around the condition and use of the electrical installations such as the electric stove and hot water tanks, and exposed electrical connections. As an example, the majority of the furnaces are not in working condition, and the occupants advised us that they heat their home by opening the oven door and turning the elements on to the high position. B.C. Fire Code states in 2.4.7.1. Electrical installations shall be used and maintained so as not to constitute an undue fire hazard. In this case, an oven of a residential stove is not intended to function for hours at a time with the door in the open position. This is a hazardous practice and should not be allowed to continue. The furnace should be repaired to a safe operating condition. The missing protective covers on breaker panels and exposed electrical connection boxes, are also addressed under the same section of the B.C. Fire Code. 'Combustible material Section 2.4.1. 1) of the BC Fire Code states: Combustible waste material in and around buildings shall not be permitted to accumulate in quantities or location that will constitute an undue fire hazard The shear volume of material inside several of these residential units makes it difficult to walk through, without walking on, or tripping over the piles. In some cases the material ranges in nature from discarded combustible materials to salvaged scrap metal products. The crawispaces were often found to be filled with discarded materials and combustible waste; in contravention of section 2.4.1. 1) of the BC Fire Code that states: Combustible waste material in and around buildings shall not be permitted to accumulate in quantities or location that will constitute an undue fire hazard, and section 2.4.1. 3) provides: Horizontal concealed spaces, such as crawl spaces and ceiling spaces, shall not be used for the storage of combustible materials. Fire department emergency access to buildings Several of these units have accumulated so much material in their exterior yard area, that fire department access to the building is severely hampered. The large piles of debris and discarded material will not allow fire fighters to place ladders on the exterior of the building to reach the second story windows. Section 2.5.1.2. 1) of the BC Fire Code states; Access panels or windows provided to facilitate access for fire fighting operations shall be maintained free of obstruction. Missing hand rails and railings Several of the units inspected had missing hand rails and guard rails on stairs and around openings in the second floor. The unguarded openings on the second floor(s) present an extreme hazard to anyone that enters the building. If emergency workers attempted to enter this building under smoke and fire conditions, the missing stairwells and lack of hand/guard rails could lead to a fall that will result in serious injury or death. Section 9.8.8.1(1) of the BC Building Code requires that a guard(s) be placed around openings where the elevation change is greater than 600 millimetres, to prevent falls. Fire fighters entering these structures would also be at risk of injury from these unguarded openings. Clearances required around appliances such as furnaces and hot water heaters It was noted that several of the appliances within the residential units do not have the required clearances from combustibles that are required to maintain safe operation of such appliances. Section 2.6.1.5. 1) states Required clearances between chimneys, flue pipes or appliance and combustible construction shall be maintained in conformance with the British Columbia Building Code. And 2) Combustible materials shall not be located within the required clearance space surrounding chimneys, flue pipes or appliances, or adjacent to ash pit or cleanout doors. In addition to issues surrounding required clearances, Section _2.6.1.6. states the operation and maintenance procedures of heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems, including appliances, chimneys and flue pipes, and states that these appliances "shall be operated and maintained so as not to create a hazardous condition." Fire code violations inside the individual suites. *All references are to the BC Fire Code 2006 unless otherwise noted and references to attached photographs are made where relevant. Unit 5 1. Section 2.1.3.3. Smoke alarms have been removed. Ensure 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms are installed and maintained in working condition. Photograph #4 2. Section 2.4.7.1 Check and repair wiring and replace protective cover to hot water tank. Electrical cover is to be maintained in place at all times. Photo #6 3. Section 2.6.1.5. (1) and (2) Remove combustible storage next to furnace and hot water tanks and maintain clear at all times. Photo #3, 6 and 7 Unit 5 con't 4. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove all storage from craws space and maintain free of storage at all times. Secure crawl space so as to prevent access by unauthorized entry. Photo #8 5. Section 2.2.1.2. 1) Repair all holes in drywall so as to maintain integrity of the required fire separation. Drywall was found to be removed in ceiling in upstairs bedroom Photo #15 Unit 6 1. Section 2.1.3.3. Smoke alarms have been removed. Ensure 110 volt interconnected smoke are installed and maintained in working condition. Photo #18 2. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove all storage from crawl space and maintain free of storage at all times. Secure crawl space so as to prevent access by unauthorized entry. Photo # 31, 32 3. Section 2.6.1.5. (1) and (2) Remove combustible storage next to furnace and hot water tanks and maintain clear at all times. Photo #20 Unit 7 1 1. Section 2.1.3.3. Smoke alarms have been removed. Ensure 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms are installed and maintained in working condition. Photo # 41, 45 2. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove all storage from crawl space and maintain free of storage at all times. Secure crawl space so as to prevent access by unauthorized entry. Photo # 37, 38 3. Section 2.2.1.2. 1) Repair all holes in drywall so as to maintain integrity of the required fire separation. Holes were noticed in ceiling in the north west corner of the living room and the west wall in crawlspace Photo # 40 4. Section 2.6.1.6. 1) Furnace has been modified with a propane adapter fitting. Furnace is to be serviced so as to be in working condition as originally designed as per manufacturer's specifications. Photo # 44 1. Section 2.1.3.3. Smoke alarms have been removed. Ensure 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms are installed and maintained in working condition. Photo # 53, 65 2. Section 2.4.7.1 Check wiring and replace protective cover to hot water tank. Electrical cover is to be maintained in place at all times. Photo # 56 3. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove all storage from crawl space and maintain free of storage at all times. Secure crawl space so as to prevent access by unauthorized entry. Photos # 61, 62, 63, 64, 66 4. Section 2.2.1.2. 1) Repair all holes in drywall so as to maintain integrity of the required fire separation. Holes were noticed in northeast corner of living room and behind clothes dryer. Photo #54 Unit 9 1. Section 2.1.3.3. Smoke alarms have been removed. Ensure 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms are installed and maintained in working condition. Photo # 81, 82 2. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove accumulation of car tires from crawlspace. Secure crawl space so as to prevent access by unauthorized entry. Photo # 102 Unit 10 1. Section 2.1.3.3. Smoke alarms have been removed. Ensure 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms are installed and maintained in working condition. Photos 90, 94, 100 2. Section 2.6.1.5. (1) and (2) Remove combustible storage next to furnace and hot water tanks and maintain clear at all times. Photo # 87, 88 3. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove all storage from crawl space and maintain free of storage at all times. Secure crawl space so as to prevent access by unauthorized entry. Photos 98, 99, 100, 101, 105, 106, 107 4. Section 2.2.1.2. 1) Repair all holes in drywall so as to maintain integrity of the required fire separation. Holes were found in southwest corner of living room. Photo # 89 Unit 11 1. Section 2.1.3.3. Smoke alarms have been removed. Ensure 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms are installed and maintained in working condition 2. Section 2.2.1.2. Ensure missing blocking required for fire separation in crawl space between unit 11 and 12 is installed. 3. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove all storage from crawl space and maintain free of storage at all times. Secure crawl space so as to prevent access by unauthorized entry. Photo # 198, 199, 200, 201,202 Unit 12 1. Section 2.1.3.3. This unit has not installed 110 volt interconnected as per previous Fire Department order. Required to install 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms and maintain in working condition. 2. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove all storage from crawl space and maintain free of storage at all times. Photo # 192 Unit 13 1. Section 2.1.3.3. Smoke alarms have been removed: Ensure 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms are installed and maintained in working condition. Photo # 122 2. Section 2.4.7.1 Check and repair wiring and replace protective cover to hot water tank. Electrical cover is to be maintained in place at all times. Photo # 125 3. Section 2.6.1.5. (1) and (2) Remove combustible storage next to furnace and hot water tanks and maintain clear at all times Photo # 119, and 125 Unit 13 con't 4. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove all storage from crawl space and maintain free of storage at all times. Secure crawl space so as to prevent access by unauthorized entry. Photos # 126 to 140 inclusive. 5. Section 2.2.1.2. 1) Repair all holes in drywall so as to maintain integrity of the required fire separation. Photo # 142 Unit 14 1. Section 2.1.3.3. Smoke alarms have been removed. Ensure 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms are installed and maintained in working condition. Photo # 157 Unit 15 1. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove all combustible storage from crawl space and maintain free of combustible storage at all times. Photo# 169, 170, 171 and 172 Unit 16 1. Section 2.1.3.3. Smoke alarms have been removed. Ensure 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms are installed and maintained in working condition. Photo # 179 2. Section 2.4.7.1 Check and repair wiring and replace protective cover to hot water tank. Electrical cover is to be maintained in place at all times. Photo # 176 3. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove all storage from crawl space and maintain free of storage at all times. Secure crawl space so as to prevent access by unauthorized personnel. Photos # 186 to 190 inclusive. 4. Section 2.2.1.2. 1) Repair all holes in drywall so as to maintain integrity of the required fire separation. Holes in drywall were found in the hallway and stairwell and must be repaired. Photo # 175 and 184 Unit 17 1. Section 2.1.3.3. Smoke alarms have been removed. Ensure 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms are installed and maintained in working condition. Photo # 220, 225 2. Section 2.2.1.2. 1) Repair all holes in drywall so as to maintain integrity of the required fire separation. The wall upstairs where the B vent rises has, the drywall removed and must be repaired. Photo# 224 3. Section 9.8.8.1 (1) of the BC Building Code. Missing railing and handrail on stairs is missing and is required to be replaced and maintained in good repair. Photo # 222, 226, 227 4. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove all storage from crawl space and maintain free of storage at all times. Secure crawl space so as to prevent access by unauthorized entry. Photo # 231, 233 Unit 18 1. Section 2.1.3.3. Smoke alarms have been removed Ensure 110 volt interconnected smoke alarms are installed and maintained in working condition. Photo # 207, 213 Unit 18 con't 2. Section 2.2.1.2. 1) Repair all holes in drywall so as to maintain integrity of the required fire separation. The wall in the downstairs bathroom has holes in the drywall and is required to be repaired 3. Section 2.4.1.1. 3) Remove all storage from crawl space and maintain free of storage at all times. Secure crawl space so as to prevent access by unauthorized entry. Photos 208 to 212 inclusive. Unit 19 1. Was not inspected as it was inaccessible to inspection team. Unit 20 1. Section 2.4.7.1 The current configuration of plastic ductwork in the crawlspace does not allow the electric clothes dryer to function as designed, as the bends in the duct work allow for the accumulation of lint that is highly combustible. This plastic ducting should be changed to a non-combustible metal ducting. Photo # 236 and 237 Common orooerty The following units had excessive material, both combustible and non combustible; piled outside the building on common property, that would obstruct fire fighter assess to the building. 1. Section 2.4.1.1. 1) and section 2.5.1.2.1) Remove all combustible items in rear yard of Unit #5 and maintain clear at all times so as to provide fire fighting access to second floor bedroom windows. Photo # 70 2. Section 2.4.1.1. 1) and section 2.5.1.2.1) Remove all combustible items in yard of Unit # 6 and maintain clear at all times so as to provide fire fighting access to second floor bedroom windows. Photos # 67, 68 3. Section 2.4.1.1. 1) and section 2.5.1.2.1) Remove all combustible items in yard of Unit # 7 and maintain clear at all times so as to provide fire fighting access to second floor bedroom windows. Photo # 33, 77 4. Section 2.4.1.1. 1) and section 2.5.1.2.1) Remove all combustible items in rear yard of Unit # 8 and maintain clear at all times so as to provide fire fighting access to second floor bedroom windows. Photo # 69 5. Section 2.4.1.1. 1) and section 2.5.1.2.1) Remove all combustible items in rear yard of Unit # 13 and maintain clear at all times so as to provide fire fighting access to second floor bedroom windows. Photo # 154, 155 ' Dane Spence Fire Chief/Director Community Fire Safety Maple Ridge Fire Department Appendix C (March 5, 2009) Page I of I From: Marc Desjardins Sent: March 12, 2009 8:31 PM To, Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray-, Jim Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick: admin @ rnrccc.org: Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Dueck: Al Hoga[th; Linda King; Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject; Northumberland Court - f would like to add n-iy narne to the list of residents who ai-e tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that, has been occurrino at Northurnberlaii.d. Court. - I ask that YOU respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws., and then lenforce these bylaws, on any individual or cornpany who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes haNe their business License suspended until itcan be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doinc, business. "I Marc Des-jardins 16/03/2009 p1cre .1 C.,,-f I C�- Frorn: Michael Patterson Sent: March 4., 2009 9:02 PM To: Ernie Daykin-, Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Masson; Sandy Blue, Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Brock McDonald-, Diane, IVIerenick,- admin@rnrccc,o,--g-, ChervI Ashlie; Judy DueckAt Hogarth; Linda King: Michael Morden; Craig SpeirS Subject: Northumberland Court - I would like to add my -name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been OCCUrring at Korthurtiberiand Court. - J ask. that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful ci�loyinent and enact adequate nuisance bylaws., and then enforce these bylavs, on any individual or company who hLbitually puss the ent.,re conirnunit-Y at risk bv not k-e-1pina their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. - Further 1. ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt byla\vs and building codes have their business license suspended until it can I-)e shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business, respecttully,, Michael Patterson 09/03/2009 F,omo; ChsdnNeedham� Sent: March 8.2ODA9:1SAM To: Ernie Dav4n: Mike Murray;Jim R ke� Pon Riaoh Sandy Blue; Stephen Cote Hokxnk; Stephen J Cote-Ro|vink; Brock McDonald: Diane K4eroniok: admin@rnrcoc onJ; Cheryl Aah|ie�Judy Dueok;A|Hogarth;Linda King; Michael Morden�Craig Speim Subject. NorthurnDerland Court '| would like toadd mymarnetothe list ofresidents who are tired nfthe ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court. - I ask that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enactadequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce, these bylaws, onany individual orcompany who habitually puts the entire community ot risk bynot keeping their rental properties uptnaccepted BC fire and building codes. Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaurt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the communiiies in which they are doing business. O9/08/2009 u Jaci Diachuk From: Jolanda Sent: March 1, 2009 3:13 Pik To: Mike Murray; Jim [Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cate-Rolvink; Brack McDonald; Ernie Daykin; Diane Merenlck; admin amrccu.org; Cheryl Astalie; Judy Dueck; At Hogarth; Linda King; Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court - I would life to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court. - I ask that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws: on any individual or company who habitually puts the entire comr; nunity at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they kvill respect the communities in which they are doing business. - i have heard from Realtors that they prefer not to sell in this neighborhood due to the ongoing problems a few blocks away. It is not deemed `safe' to prospective buyers, that means our property values are going down as well. Jolanda Oostewagel Maple Ridge 09/03/2009 Pa -CC I Of IMIXIMM, From: Giancarlo Briglio Sent: February 28, 2009 10:41 PM To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Mai -son; Sandy Blue', Stephen J Cate- Ro[vink, Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick-1 Cheryl Ashlip; Judy Dueck-, A] Hogarth: Linda King; Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court Dear Mayor and Council, and city officials, As a home owner who resides on Fraser Street, we would like to add bur names to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime, violence and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court. This plague on our city must be stopped. We ask that you respect our common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or company who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. Further we ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the Communities in which they are doing business. This has gone on for long enough! It needs to end now, and we urge you at the next city council meeting to stand up and do the right thing, Slum Lords do not deserve to continue victimizing residents of this community. Sincerely Amber & Giannnrin Briglio 09/03/2009 Page I of I From: Michelle [ Sent: February 27, 2009 3:14 PM To- Ernie DayK'in,- Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Riachi; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen i Cote- Rokiink; Stephen J Cote-Rolvink,- Brock P&Donaddl Diane Merenick; admin@rnrccc,org; Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Dueck; Al Hogarth; Linda, King; Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court - 1 would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court - I ask that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce 'these bylaws, on any individual or company who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. - Further 1 ask that these individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business. 09/03/2009 From: Mark Lacroix,' _ Sent: Febm 2T2009 3:09PM /o: Enn,euGary KGaneon�Sandy Blue; Stephen JCo&e' Rowmk; Stephen uuome-no|mnK; Brock McDonald; Diane NYensniok;admin@mncc.org; Cheryl Aah|ie�Judy Dueck;AJHoQarth;Linda K]ng��iohwe|Mord*n;Craig Speive Subject: Northumberland Court '| would like toeddmynGrDgtothe list 8fresidents who are tired ofthe ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring atNorthumberland Court. '|ask,thatyou respect mycommon law right toquiet and peaceful enjoyment and enaotadequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or companyvqho habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keepingtheir rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. - Fuft.her 1 ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business, f\au�- i ofl From: Ton. Fielding ] Sent. February 27.2UOQ2:13PW To- Ernie Murray;Jim Ru|e;Ron Rianh:GemManson; Sandy B|uo;Stephen JCu1o' mo|wnx|muypnenJ Cote'Rokdnk;Brock McDonald: DieneK8erenick�admin��mmo c�rq;Chory| Aoh|ie:Judy Dueok; A|Hogm�h;L\ndaKing�&8iohae|yWonden�Cxa' Speira Subject: Northumberland Court - I would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court. I ask that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or compary who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. Further I ask that those individuals kqho habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended un. il it can be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business, O9/03/2009 Page lof| From: BonnyKrell [ Sent FebmaN,27,2009 2:08PM To: Ernie D yWikeMurnay Jim Rule: Ron Riaoh; Gary Manson; Sandy B!uo�Stephen J Cote' Rolv|nk;3UsphenJCote-Ruhink;BnookMoDomd¢DiemeMenaniok;admin@m000.org; Cheryl Aah|ie;Judy Dueok A]Hogarth;UndaKing;Michael Worden; Cnyig8peAna Subject: North U mbe Hand Court - I would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court, - I ask that you respect my common lavi right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or company who habitucilly Puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted SC f ire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually f launt bylaws and building cod have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect t communities in which they are doing business. I 89/03/2009 Page I of I Z, From: Dianne Adair ( Sent. February 27, 2009 8:20 AM To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray', Jim Rule; Ron Riach-, Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Stephen J Cote-Rolvink,- Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick; admin@rnrccc,org; Cheryl Ashiie; Judy Dueck; Al Hogarth; Linda King-, Michael Mordent Craig Speirs Subject- Northumberland Court - I would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court. - I ask that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaw ' s, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or company who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business. 09/03/21009 FAM From: Trevor Sent: Febmar,-26, 2009 10:24 PM To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray: Jim Rule; Ron Ria-1h; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink.; Brock McDonald: Diane Morenick; adrnin@mrc(.,,c,,o- Cheryl Ashlie; Judy DUeck; Al Hogarth-, Linda King; Michael Morder; Craig Speirs; trevor davies Subject: North-Amberland Court - 1. would 111c to add my name to the list of residents who are fired oF the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court. - 1 ask that you respect nay cornmon law ri-ht. 1.0 Quiet and peaceful enjoyment. and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or con-,q-)any who tiabitUaLly Puts the elltirC cote MUnity at risk by not Beeping heir rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. Further I ask that those individuals wbo habitually flaun., bylaws and building codes have their b sI license suspended until it can be shownw that they ill respect the cornf.mraities in they, the u, ness are doing burine: s. 09/03/2009 R.Ze I of I Aft From: joss esteves;, Sent: February 26, 2009 9.41 PM To: Ernie Daykin; Mke Murray; Jim Rue; Ron Riach; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue', Stephen J Gote- Rolvink;.Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick; admin@m'rccc.o-g; Cheryl Ashlis, Judy Dueck, Al Hogarth; Linda King, Michael Mordent Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court - I would like to add my nanie to the, list of resident,, who are tired of he on-oinR critne and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court, ask that YOU reSPCCt my COMMOrl right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance byla,,vs, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or'conapany who habitually put,., the entire commun.ity at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire, and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building. codes have their business —license Suspended until it can be shown that they will resp,,ct the CMUMII-itiCS in T,vhich they are doin2 bUsiness. 09/03/2009 From: Lisa Moore [ 'G�R] Sent: Febma�26.2OOQ8:21AM To: Ernie Daykin,Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Riach;Gary Manson; Sandy B|ue�Stephen JCoto' RohinkStephenJCote'Rulvink;BrockyWoDonald;DianeMenanidcudmin@m .urg;Cheryl Aahlie;Judy Duook;A|Hogarth;Linda King; Michael K4onden:Craig Bpeim Subject: Northumberland Court -|wouldUketoaddmynemetothe|istufreodevtswhoanatinadoftheongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court. | ask that you respect n1ycommon law right to quietand eaoef | enjoyment and adequateenact noe bylaws, and then enforce these byl' bylaws, hhabitually puts the er-fiveCommunity mt risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. 'Further { ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business. 09/0D/2009 Punc|nfl From., MareneBaudon Sent: February 25.20099:02PM To: Ernie Daykin; MikeK4urnay�Jim Ru|e� Ron Riach; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen Cohy' Rolvink; Stephen JOota-Rulvink; Brack McDonald; Diane Mereniuk admin@mrmn-.org� Cheryl Aoh|ie,Judy Dueok; A|Hogurth;Linda King; Michae|K8nnden: CnakgSpeire Subject: Northumberland Cnud [� I would like U»add myname tothe list ofresidents who are tired ofthe ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring edNorthumberland Court. - I ask that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enFct adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or company who habitually puts the entire community at risk bynot keeping their rental properties uptoaccepted BCfire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building c-odes have their business license suspended untP it can be shown that they will respect Lhe communities in which they are doing business. 09/03/22009 From: John Mitchell [ Sent: February 23.2OOQQ:65AM To: Ernie Murray; Jim Ru|e�Ron Riaoh;Gary K8 Sandy Stephen J11"lobe- Rolv|nk; !Brock McDonald; Diane k8gnenickedmin@mrcuu.org|GhOlmlAshie;Judy Duouk;/Q Subject: FW: Northumberland Court HiAdd nnyName imthe list peNordlurnbedandCourt P|ease try and get this problem solved, My Morn lives in Brickvvood Place and her sleep is interrupted on e nightly bases. The nightly drug running passed her building to go to Northumberland Court !svery upsetting, Her Health is now suffering greatly because ofthe lack Vfrest. I have rental properties in Penboton,Tdo not believe they would allow me to make a s|orn area there' I'nmsureyuushuu|dbeab|*tnflndsornethingtoso|vetheprob|erninthe°BCfireandbui|ding Onanother note Ihave been told that people |nVancouver as well as Burnaby now refer to Maple Ridge as y4ETHO Ridge This isupsetting tm rneIhave lived here all rnylife and had always thought of our community as a nice one. Connie Mitchell You can visit our web sifieat. hrt-n'//vvvxw.itsrnyhcd}day.con1/pemdc±un Email or phone Connie to WWI From: barry.pau|son. To., edaykm@nnopiehdge.ca; nnrnurray@nnep|ehdge.ca; jruhe@rnop|ehdge,ca; niadl@rnap|eddge.c8;grDansoM@map|ehdge.ca;sbiue@rnap|ehdge.ca; 'cotenJ{Vink@map|er|dge.oa; ^CDt2rO|v|nk@rOap\eridge.00; brDcd0Oa|d@rap\eridge.cm| dnmerenich@rnapiehdge,ca; adr0in@rnrccc.org; cash||e@rDap|eridge.ca; `dueck@nnap|eridge.ca; ahogarth @rnap|er|dge.ca; |king@rnapiehdge.ca| nnrnonjen@0rnap|er|d9e.ca; capeirs@rnapleridge.ca Subject: Northumberland Court Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:48:52-0500 - I would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring atNorthumberland Court. '|ask that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and O9/O3/2004 Page I OF I From: kevn [ Sent: Febmarv22,200SQi9PM To. Ernie Daykin;Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Aiaoh;Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen JCoe' Robink; Stephen J Cote-Rolvink� Brook McDonald; Diane Merenick; adnin@mrcoo,nrg; Cheryl AuhUa;Judy Dueuk�A|HogaMb;Linda. King; Michael /Nurden; Cnaig8peieSubject: Northumberland Court - i would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired o.f the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring atNorthumberland Court. - I ask, that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoVment and enact adecluate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, onany individual orcompany who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws'and building codes have their businesa{|censesuspendedunti|itcanbeshovvnthattheyvviUrespecttheuornrnunitiesinvvhichthey are doing business. O9/03/20O9 pa�le 1 ol., I From: eLeakist Sent: Febriary 22, 2009 4:49 PM To: Ernie Daykin-, Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Mach; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Stephen J Cote- Rolvin k; Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick; admin@mrccc,org; Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Dueck; Al Hogarth; Linda King; Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court - I would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court, - I ask that you respect my common law right to quiet ano peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or corn ' pany who habitually pits the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it car. be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business. 09/03/2009 Puuc | of} From: TBaxter Sent: February 17.2OO89:86AM To: EmieDeykin; Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron RiaohGary Manson: Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Ro|vink, Stephen JCote-Rokink;Brock McDonald. Diane Mexanidc dmin@m ocg; Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Dueck� Al Hogarth; Linda King; Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject: NonhumbmdandCourt | would like bzadd myname tothe list ofresidents who are tired ufthe ongoing Crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northum�erland Court, Iask that you respect n)ycommon law right ioquiet and peaoefu|*rJnt andenac adequate nuisance bylaws, and then entormathese bylaws, onany individual orcompany who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and Duilding codes, Furthei I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license susPended unti. it can be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business. O9/08/2009 Page I of I From- CHRIS BOSSLEY [ Sent: February 16, 2009 8:24 AM To- Ernie Daykim Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Manson: Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink-, Stephen J Cote-Rolvink: Brock McDonald: Diane Marenick; admin @vrnrccc.org; Cheryl Ashlie-, Judy Dueck; Al Hogarth; Linda King; Michael Morden-, Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court - I would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court. - I ask that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or company who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business. 09/03/2009 Page I of I P Front : happy sailer i Sent: February 11. 2009 4:43 PM To: Emit,,- Daykin; Mike Murray-, Jim Rule: Ron Riach; Gar Manson; Sandy Bluc, Stephen J Cote- Y 5 Rolvink: Brock McDonald: Diane Merenick, admin @ mrccc.org; ChervI Ashlie; Judy Dueck; Al Hogarth; Linda King; Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court - i would like to add. niv naine to the list of resklents who are, Bred of'-.hc ongoing crime and abUSe that has been occurring at Northumberland Court.. - I ask thLat you respect in coninion law right to quiet and peaceful erijoyrnent and enact adequate I y nuisance bylaws, and theta enforce these bylaws, on any Individual or co:inpany who habitually puts the �-ntire community at risk by not keeping their rental propertics Lip to accepted BC fire, and buHding odes. Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their buwincss license suspcnded until it can be shown that they will respect the coniinunitics in which theFv are doinE business, 09/03/2009 Page Iofi From: Bonnie Smith Seat February 8, 2009 3:21 i='M To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray- Jim Rule; Ron Riacn; Gary Manson: Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote Rolwnk; Brack McDonald; Diane Merenick; s.dmin0arnrccc.org: Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Dueck: Al ogarth; Linda King; Michael Morden: Crain Speirs Subject. Northumberland Court i world like to add my Marne to the Iist of ressaents who are tirP-i of `he ongoing Crime &r7d abuse that has been ocr,- u rring of Northumberland Court- - I ask that you respect ray common lauv right to quiet and peaceful enjoyrne€ l and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws. on any individual ar company +,vh� habitually puts the entice nornrnun;tv at risk by not keeping tha:r regtai properties Lip to accepted SC fire and buifdincg •odes. - Further 1 -Rsk that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws - and bvildiina codes have their business ficeriso suspanded until it car, be shown that they will respect gis co- munities in which they are doing basiness FP,EE A Irsr tft-R !ror Rur 2mall -_ty Eedir-1alit 1 Click Herel _q 09/03/-009 From: Sue Davies � To: ErnieDovkn; Mike Murray; Jim Ru|o; Ron Ria� ' ch� Gary �andv B1�J Cote Ro�ink; S�mhonJCo�-Ro�in�rookMcDon�d:Diane KAonanck; 'min@m rg-Che?yl AmhUe;Judy Dueck AJHoQerth Linda K]nQ�Michael Mcnden;Craig Spere Subject: Northumberland Court 1would like toadd nnyname tothe list ofresidents whoare tired ofthe ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring atNorthumberland Court. - I ask that you respect my common l2w right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, onany individual orcompany who habitually puts the entire community atrisk bynot keeping their rental properties Upto accepted B[fire and building codes. Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can beshown that they will respect the communities inwhich they are doing business. O9/03/2U09 Pa 4 ge I C) 't 1 REM From., Brad Clark: Sent: February 6., 2009 6:37 PM To Ernie Day'Kin; Mike Murray; Jim Rule, Ron Riach', Gary lVanson; Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; frock McDonald: Diane Merenick-, admin @ mrccc,org; Cheryl Ashlie, Judy Dueck; Al Hogarth; Linda King; Michael Mordent Craig Speirs Subject: NorthumlBerland Court - I Wout'd like to add inv name to the list of residents who are tired, of the on-cing criale and abuse. thcall has been OCCUrrju at Northumberland Court. - I ask that you respect my common 1mv right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and. enact adequate nuisance li-vlaws. and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or company who habitually PLIVS the. entire community at risk by not keepin- their rental properties LIP to accepted BC fire and building - FuiTher I ask that those individuals who habiLL1111-ty flaunt bylaw's and buit.ding codes have 'their business liccnse suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the com.munities in which they -ire doing business. t I am curious why this building has not been condemned and demolished, it is clearly an old building, not fit for haUtafion, and a burden on the entire city. Just get rid of it. A suggestion... how about looking at just buying out the property, use the land to build a parking structure that could serve commuters to the west coast express, the future mUSBUrn, haney house, and the eventual waterfront project. Parking will be needed, and its in a good location for that use, and may encourage more commercial development in this area, Brad Clark 09/03/2009 Nq,oe I of I I From: nancyxinfleid [ Sent: January 27, 2009 3:46 PM To: Ernie Daykin', Mike Murray', Jim Rule, Ron Riach; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Brock McDonald; Diane Maenick; an'riiin@mrcc,-;.org; Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Dueck; Al Hogarth; Linda. King; Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject. Northumberland Court - I WOLLICIi lii,Le to add my name to the list of residents wbo are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that. has been occu ring at Northurnberland. Court, ask that you respect rriv comnion law right to quiet and I,Icaceful enjoyment and enact adeqUate nuisance bylams,. aid then enforce these bylaws, on any indi\,idUal orl-ompany who habitually pelts the entire coramunity at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and budding code-,, - I lurth.er I ask that those indi*duals who habitual tv flaunt bylaws Lind bui tdin- codes have their business license Suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the com.rnun.Les in which they are doing bLISiness. I 09/03/2009 Page lof< From: Doreen Kelly ! Sent: January 2O.2DOQ11:21AK8 To: Ernie '.mo^emu'rmy.umnu/e:oonRecn: Gary Manson; Sandy U|ue,-Stephen JCote' Ho|vink; Stephen JCote-Rokvink; Brock McDonald; DimneMerenick� �dm|n��mrrco.org'; Cher� Aah|ha;Judy DueoK 4JHoga�h;L�daKing; ��inha*|��onden;C i 8peina Subject: Northumberland Court -1would like toadd nlyname tDthe list ofresidents who are tired Of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring atWorthurnbehanc Court, I ask that you respect my common law right to qUiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, onany individual orcompany who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have +their business license suspended urtil it car be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business. Doreen Kelly Maple Ridge, BC V2X BT6 aj�lJ L� ..�s^--y rn"�e�`�u�o��eu��ov"u .�rnu~,. O9/0B/2009 Page I of I From: Shirley Laity (V) Sent: January 26, 2009 10-123 AM To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Morison: Sandy Blue- Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Brack McDonald- Diane Nlerenick; adrnin@i-nrccc.org; Cheryl Ashlie!- Judy Dueck,- Al Hogarth; Linda King; Michael Morder; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court - I Would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at North urriberland Court, - I as"k that you respect my common law right to qulet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or company who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes, - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doingbusiness. Shirloy Laity. Maple Ridge, BC 09/03/2009 Page I of 1 Z am= From: sherry belsey I' Sent: January 25, 2009 11:00 AM To: Ernie Daykin,- Mike Murray; JiM Rule; Ron Riach-, Gary Manson: Sandy Blue; Stepher J Cote- Rolvink; Brock McDonald-, Diane Merenick; admin@rnrccc.Drg: Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Dueck; Al Hogarth; Linda King-, Michael Murder; Craig Speirs Subject! Northumberland Court - 1. would Ilk-, to add mv name to the list of resalents who are tired of flae. ongoing crime and abuso that has been occurring at Northumberland Court. - I ask that you repect my common law riolit to quiet and peaceful enjjoyrn.ent and enact adequate IlUisance bvla%.vs. fuqd then enfo rce these bylaws, on any individual or conipan,y who hablitually puts their entire conimuni..y at risk by not keepi ng I.heir rental properties up to accepted BC fire anl buildin o codes. -Further I ask those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their license suspended until it can be shown that they will i—.spoct the corninunitics in which they are do lng business. - Respectfully, Clary and Sherry BeIscy Yahoo! Can da Taolba h fmjxuaywherc on the web 3Ad kpkmark vour favoutite sites. Download it novel ........... 09/03/2009 Pa-C .1 of i C, From. Barb Mitchell [ Sent- January 24, 2009 71-11 PM To: Ernie Daykin: Mike Murray; Jim Rule: Ron Riach, Gary Nllanson; Sandy Blue-, Sfephen J Cote- Rolvink; Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick; admin@mrccc,org; Chery(Ashlie, Judy Dueck; Al Hlogarth; Linda King; Michael Morder: Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Coul. robert rnitchell nses by email please.calls only - I wouk! like to add my naine to tne li~t (-.)f residents who are tired of the ongoing ciinie and abusc that In has been occurrinQ at NorLhuniberland Court. I ask that you respect my ConArlon law right to quiet and. peaceful enjoyment and enact adecluate 'd, ial or c 11U] sance bylaws. Lmd then enforce these bylal�vs, on any indivi ompany who 11abituall'huts the entire con-).rnunitv at risk by not keeping. their rental properties Lip to accepted BC firc and building ,-'Odes. Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaUnt hvlaNvs and building codes have their Oustriess license suspended until it can be shown that they will respecl the coi-rimunities in which they are doinl? business. 09/0-3/2009 Pa-e I Of I From: michael bourqUe Sent: January 23, 2009 7:05 PM To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray; Jim Rule: Ron Riach, Glary Manson; Sandy Blue, Stephen J Cote- Rolvink;Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick; ad,-riin@mrccc.org; Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Dueck; Al Hogartth; Linda King-, Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court 1. would like to add niY narne to the list of residents who are fired of the oncoino crime and abuse Lhut tias been occurring at Nortbumberiand Court. I ask that you respect. my con-unon law ri-hL to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and' enact adequate nu-isance.hylaws. and then enforce these bylaws. on any, individual or company who habitually ptits the entire communitv at: risk by not keeping heir rental properties tip to accepted' C fire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individual,., who habitually 11,Lun-II bylaws and building- codes have their .. busi.ness license suspended until If can be shown that theV will respect the corninunitics, in which they are doing business. C 09/03/2009 From: Karen Broadbent I Sent: January 23.2000714AM To. Ernie Rolvink-, Stephen J Cote-Rolvink-, Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick; admin@m rccc.org; Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Dueck; Al Hogarth� Linda King; Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject. Northumberland Court iwould like tVadd n1yname bJthe list ofresidents who are tired ofthe ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring atNorthumberland Court. '. ! ask that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoymenL and enact ad equate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce theee, bylaws, on any individual or company who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keepingtheir rental properties up to accepted BIC fire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business. pnac I of .1 From: Tony Carriley Sent- January 22, 2009 10:18 AM To. Ernie Daykin, Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue" Stephen IJ Cote- Rolvink; Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick; admin @ rnrccc.org; Cheryl Ashlie- Judy Dueck; A! Hogarth; Linda King', Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court - I wou-Id like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing critne and abuse that ;Hari 'been. occurrino at Northumberland Court. - 1 ask that y mou respect my col lal�v right to quiet and peacefu] enjoymentand onact adequate lIffisance bylaws, emd then enforce these bylaws. on any individual or company who 11abirually puts the entire c-cvniniunity at risk by not kecping their rental properties tip to accepted BC fire and building codcs. - Furthcr I ask that those individuats who habitually daunt bylaws and building codes have their - business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the corria.aunilies ih which they are doing business. C11 09/011/12009 PaE-,e 'I o "M Proms: Ruth Anderson [ Sent:- January 22, 2009 9:41 AM To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Brock McDonald; Diane Merenlck', admin(&mrccc.or gi - Cheryl Ashife; Judy Dueck; Al Hogarthl- Linda King; Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court - f would like to add my name to the list (if residents w-ho arc tired ol"thy: on-oing crime and abuse that has been occurring at NorLhUrnberlaild Court. C� - I have lived in Maple Ridge for eight years now and am so sad to see the way that crime has risen and is controlling out lives. I will not go downtown alone in the evening because of concerns for my own safety. I think that the BASE cause of the problem is drugs and I am not sure how you fix that but we must find a way to make our evironment safe once again. - I ask that vou respect my Conii-non laity right to quiet and peaceful eniovinent and enact adequate nuisance bylaws. and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or coinpany who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fir-, and building codes. en "Z� - Further I ask that those individuals rho habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the corn.munities in which they are doing business. The owner of Northumberland Court has cost this district thousands of dollars, it not more with his reckless behavious and I do not feel that people like that deserve of crkjoy ol-Ir environment. Shape tip or ship ouW . Ruth Anderson, 09/03/2009 Pnnelo1,l Frnn-c TareSolvey� Sent January22 20089:28AM To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Riach; GeryManoon� Sandy Blue; Ste�hanJ Co��- Ro�in�GtephenJCo�-Rcb)nk;BrockMoDmne�;D�ne��eren�k ednin �m ' org; Cheryl Asnlie; Judy Dueck; Ai Hogarth; Linda King; Michael Morden: Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court I would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court. | askthat you respect my commonlaw ri,,-.lh toquiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, unany ind3vidma|orcompany h habitually puts the entire Community ad hekbynckkaepingbh*irrentdpropertieouptuauceptodBCfireandbui|dinAcodes. - Furthe, I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and buildingcodes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect. the communities in which they are doing business. Tara Solve- U9/03/2009 Page I of 1 OFTi� , From: Pat Clarke [ Sent: January 22, 2009 9:25 AN To. Ernie Daykin; Mire Murray; Jim lRule; Ron Riac°h; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Brock McDonald; Diane Marenick; admin @ rnrocc.org; "" terjl Ashlie: Judy DUeck; N Hogarth; Linda King; Michael Merden; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Corm'; - i would ii.ke to acid my name to the list of residents NN.4i, arc tired of the ongoing crime and abuse th"LA has been occurr-in- at Ncrrtlr:rrrrrberlarrd Court. -1. ask that you respect my coni.mon law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyrnent and enact adequare r-rrrisarrce i yla s. and teen enforce these hy1mvs, on any i.rrdividrrai or company who habitually l)€rtc the ent;re c.ornmunity at risk by not keeping, [heir rental properties Lip to accepted Pt_, fire and build -,Ina COLS. - Further I task. that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building cocle.s have their )usiness license .suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the comr-r-iunities in which they are doing business. 09/03/2009 From. Mike Mezzabarba ( Sent: January 22, 2009 7:22 AM To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue, Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Stepher, J Cote-Rolvink,- Brock McDonald', Dian--- Merenick, admin@rnrccc.org-, Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Neck; Al Hogarth: Linda King; Michael Mordent Craig Speirs Subject: Nortnumberland Court - I would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court. - 1 ask that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance . bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or company who habitually Puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted. BC fire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually. bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business. 09/03/2009 Page I Of I From- Wayne [� Sent- January 22, 2009 6:13 AM To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray; Jim Rule', Ron Riach; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen i Cote- Rolvink; Stephen i Cote-R.olvink-, Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick; adrn;In @ rnrccc.org; Cheryl Ashlie-I Judy Dueck; At Hogarth, Linda King; Michael Mordem: Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court - I would like to add ray nwaic to the HSL of residents who are tired. of the ongoino crinic and abuse that has been OCCAII-I-IIh--, at Nordiumberland Court, - T ask that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment and enact. adoquate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce. they bylaws, on any individual or company who habituatly puLS the entire community at risk by- .not beeping their rental. properties up t-0 accepted.13C fire and buildin, code-.,,. -FuYther I ask that those individuals who habituaflv fl.a.unt bvlaws and buifdinO code.,,, have their busines, license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the conimunities in which they ,,t,-- doing business. 09/03/2009 P -, 1,2 e I : D. ! , .I. From; Tracie Wernicke [ M] Sent: January 21, 2009 9:40 PM To: Ernie D.aykin; Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Manson: Sandy Blue: Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick; admin@rnrccc,oig; Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Dueck: Al Hogarth; Linda King; Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court Would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the. onootmi crime imd abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court, - I ask tha', vol., respect my common law rig-jit to quiet and peaceful enjoynie-rit and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on arry individual car who h�, ituatly, Pitts the I b -Cnt,re, commurilty at. risk I)y riot keepin- their rental properties tip to accepted BC fire and build' IFIC; Codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws an building codes have their business license suspended until li: can bc; shown that they will respect the coriii-flunides in which. they are doing, business, Yours truly , Marcus Wernicke, 09/03/2009 PaPp i of I INMZIW.l From: kelly LF Sent: January 21, 2009 6:21 PIVI To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray; jirn Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Stephen J Cote-Rolvink; Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick,- adrnin@rnrccc.Org,' Cheryl Ishlie- Judy Dueck: Al Hagarth; Linda King; Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court Good morning Ladies and Gentlemen, As a rule I do not par -take in bombarding elected official with email. Nor do ! co.anplain. I happen to work on 224, have for 4 years and 5 days a week in this time / have seen sights that I could not imagine existed. l am sure you have heard about them so I do not need to go into detail. / love my job and am proud to say so, but this past evening a group of young men tried to block the road (224) as a college was leaving work. The woman was P lone in her car and with no options she had to come to a stop o on 224, which is when they started to take their boots to her car. Lucky for her they missed the car or where just trying to inti, nidete her. Like her / have also had problems t)vith the homeless and now am afraid at times. Some mornings I have had to sit in my car. not able to go to the building to start work. But I haven "t complained! I am thankful for the security car that drives by everyday and I am also thankful everyday that where I work, just not the location at present. I take pride in my job. file have contact with the police several times if not in the double digits by now, - I live her in Maple F?idge and / don't feel save working in the downtown core. - I would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Court and the downtown core, - I ask that you respect my common law right to quiet and peaceful enjoyment end enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or company who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes, - Further / ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business. Sincereftf Kelly 09/03/2009 From: Todd Martin [ Sent: January 21, 2009 0:03 PM To: Ernie KxikP morrRy: Jim nu|o: Pon Pli�c:; Gary Manson, Sandy Enuo; Stephen J Cot� Rokdnk;3tephenJ Cohs Ro|vink; Brock McDonald-, Dbme K4enao|Ck; admingDmrcoo.org� Chery|Aeh|ie; JudyDueok| Al H0gadh; Linda King; Michael yN0rdon: Craig Bpeim Subject., Northumberland Court I would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring a1Northumhed8nd Court. | ask that you respect nnycommon law ri�h�tuquiet and peaceful er�0ymentand enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws. on any individual or company who habitually puts the entire community at riskbynotkeeping1heir/enta|propertieauptnecceptedBCfireandbui|dingooden. Further I ask that those individuals who habituallyflaunL bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until itcan beshown. that they will respect the communities inwhich they are doing business. Todd Martin Nord"inn-lbertand Couut Page 1 o 1 WOW , From: Maria Schollen Seat: Janugry 21, 2009 5:16 Pill To: Ernie Da+skin; Mike Murray; ,.ling Rule; Bon Riach; Garb Manson; Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink: Stephen J Cote-Rolvink; Brock McDonald- Diane Merenick; admin @ mrccc,org; Cheryl 4shlie; Judi Dueck; Al hogar h; Linda king: Michael Mordent Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court -- I Would like to add my name to t31he list of'resiclents who are tired of the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northturberland Court. - I ask that you respect my corn.n-ion later right to quite and peaceful enjCiyiTlent and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, can any individual or company who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted IBC fire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals who habitually ll.aunt bylaws and building odes have their business license suspended until it can be sfio-wn that they will respect the communities in �,vhich they are doing business. Mike & Susan Cizik N'iaria & Tony Schollen 09CO3l2009 Paae I of I Jaci Diachuk From. J Paul Stevenson . Sent: January 20, 2009 9: 11 AM To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron, I iach; Gary Marson; Sandy Biue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Ste hen J Cote-Rolvink; Brock McDonald; Diane Merenick; admin@mrccc.org; Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Dueck; A[ Hogarth: Linda King; Michael Mcrden' Craig Spairs Subject: Northumberland Court - I would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired of the ongoing Crime and abuse that has 1-.)op-n occurring at North u mberla nd Court. - I ask that you respect my common law right to quite and peaceful enjoyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or company who 1-1 abitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. - Further I ask that those individuals ,vho habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until it can be shown that they will respect the communitie s in which they are doing business. 09/03/2009 Page I of I IIERJ�M, From: Able Home Services; Sent: January 19, 2009 9:48 PM To: Ernie Daykin; Mike Murray; Jim Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Ularson; Sandy Blue; Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Stechen J Cate-Rolvink; Brock McDonald: Diane Merenibk- mailo-cashlie@rnapieridge.ca"'@invalid.domain: Judy Dueck-, Al Hogarth; Linda King-, Michael Morden; Craig Speirs Subject: Northumberland Court I Barbara Offerhaus would like to add my name to the list of residents who are tired 01 the ongoing crime and abuse that has been occurring at Northumberland Couri. I ask that you respect my right to quite and peaceful enioyment and enact adequate nuisance bylaws, and then enforce these bylaws, on any individual or company who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. Further I I ask that those individuals who habitually f.aunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspenried until it car) be shown that they will respect the communities in which they are doing business. 09/03/2009 pat I of I From: Main I Sent: January 17, 2009 1:24 PM To, Ernie Daykin,- Mike Murray-, Jirn Rule; Ron Riach; Gary Manson; Sandy Blue, Stephen J Cote- Rolvink; Stephen J Cote-Rolvink; Brock McfDonald; Diane Merenick; admin@mrccc.orp; Cheryl Ashlie; Judy Dueck; Al Hogarth; Linda King; Michael Morder.; Craig 113peirs Subject: Northumberland Court I Would like to add my, narne to the list of residents who are tired of the OnCluin- crime and abuse that has been occurrinc at Northurnberland Court. I ask. that you. respect rnv corn.nion law right to quite and peaceful enjoynicnt and enact adequate nuisance '�ylaws,'and then enforce these bylaws, on miv individual or cornpany who habitually puts the entire community at risk by not keeping their rental properties up to accepted BC fire and building codes. Further I ask that those individuals who habitually flaunt bylaws and building codes have their business license suspended until. it can be shown. that they will respect the communities in which they eac doing business. 09/03/2009 Appendix D (March 5, 2009) Resolution I Whereas Division 12 of Part 3 of the Community Charter (the "Charter") authorizes Council to impose a remedial action requirement onthe ownor or owners of building including requirement to have the building brought upto a standard specified by bylaw where: 1) Counui| considers that the building is in or creates on unsafe oondib0n; and 2) Council Considers that the building contravenes the Provincial bui|dingreQu|ations or District by|evv unders. 8(3)(1)(bui|din8s and other atruotures). AND WHEREAS Jagdev Singh 41hwa| is the registered owner (the "Owner"') of e strata lot known as Unit#5. 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC and legally described as Strata Lot 5 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NVVO together with on interest in the C0O0r0On property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown ofform 1(the "Strata Lot 5"): NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ,esolves as follows: �L That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 5 is in and creates an unsafe condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(a) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot G contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003, the BC Building Code 2008, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111'1988, the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2006, the B'149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code and/or the BCFire Code 20O6; Z -that 'Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 5 )s in a hazardous condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Charier as a result of Strata Lot 5 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building By|evv No. 6I80-2803. the BC Building Code 2000. the Dis-Ihot of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988. the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2006.the B-149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Cod*. and/or the BCFire Code 20OG. & That Council hereby requires pursuant to its narnedk*| action powers under Part 3, Division 12 of the Charter that the Owner: a) agree in writing with '-the District's Manager of Inspection 5om|oea on a scheduled plan of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 5 ino|udin8 completion dates for certain works to. in the opinion of the Manager of inspection Services, ensure its safety and habitability in compliance with the standards specified in the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 8180- 2003` the District of K4mp|e Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No 4111-1988. the BC Building Code 2000' the Canadian Beo1rioa| Code Part 1. 2008. the B- 149.1'05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code.and the 8CFire Code 2006. as identified in the Manager Of Inspection Services' report dated February 16. 2009 and the Fire Chief'ereport dated March 8. 2008 no later thanfourteendays(l4)daysafternoticeofthiarenncdia|act|nnrequiremnnt under s.77o[the Charter has been sent bythe District ofMaple. Ridge tothe b) commence the work set out in the agreed plan and proceed diligently and in atimely manner instrict accordance with the dates set outinthe agreed plan punsuan�tosection3a)ofihieromo|utionnn|atorthantwentyaight(28)days after notice of this reryaediai action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District of iVlaple Ridge to the Owner; and c) complete all work set cut in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a; of this resolution and obtain from the District's Manager of Inspections confirmation in writing that the work has been completedto the Manager of lnspectioin.s' and the Fire Chief's satisfaction no later than ninety (90) days after notice of this rernediai action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District of maple Ridge to the Owner; (coliectiveiy, the `Remedial Action Requirement"), 4. That the District of Maple Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request that Council reconsider tine Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District of Maple Ridge written notice within fourteen (14) days of the date on which the notice under s. 77 of the Charter was sent and that if any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for compliance (including adhering to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution), the District of Maple Ridge may take action in accordance with section 7 of the Charter and undertake any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Require:-nent without further notice to and at the expense of the Owner. Resolution 2 Whereas Division 12 of Part 3 of the Community Charter (the "Charter") authorizes Council to impose a rernec ial action requirement on the owner or owners of a building including a requirement to have the building brought LIP to a standard specified] by bylaw where: 1) Council considers that the building is it or creates an unsafe condition; and 2) Council considers that the building contravenes the Provincial building regulations or a District bylaw under s. 8(3)(1) (buildings and other structures). AND WHEREAS Jagdev Singh Athwal is the registered owner (the "Owner") of a strata lot known as unit #6, 11723 Fraser .Street; Maple Ridge, BC and legally described as Strata Lot 6 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan N`v1f8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1 (the "Strata Lot 6"); NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, resolves as follows: 1. That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 6 is in and creates an unsafe condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(a) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot 6 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003, the BC Building Code 2006, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988, the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2006, the B-149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code and/or the BC Fire Code 2006; 2. That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 6 is in a hazardous condition within the meaning of Section 7:3(2)(b) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot 6 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003, the BC Building Code 2006, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988, the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2006, the B-149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code, and/or the BC Fire Code 2006. 3. That Council hereby requires pursuant to its remedial action powers under Part 3, Division 12 of the Charter that the Owner: a) a--ree in writing with the District's Manager of Inspection Services on o scheduled plan of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 0 including completion dates for certain works to, in the opinion of the Manager of Inspection Services, ensure its safety and habitability in compliance with the standards specified in the District of KAup|e Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180' 2O03'the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No 4111'1588,the BC Building Code 2006'the Canadian E|aotrioo| Code Part1. 2000. the B- 149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code, and the BC Fire Code 2006' as identified in the Manager Of |OSpao1ion Services' report dated February 16'20O9and the Fire Chief'sreport dated March g,2O09nnlater than fourteen days (14) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under a.77nfthe Charter has been sent bythe District ofMaple Ridge tuthe b) commence the work set out inthe agreed plan and proceed diligently and in a timely manner in strict accordance with the dates set out in the agreed plan pursuant tosection 3a>ofthis resolution nolater than twenty eight (28)days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent bythe District mfMaple Ridge tothe Owner; and c) complete all work set out inthe agreed plan pursuant tosection 3@)ofthis resoiution and obtain from the District's Manager of inspections confirmat ion in writing that the work has been completed to the Manager of Inspections' and the Fine Chief'a satisfaot|on no later than ninety (90) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District of Maple Ridge 10the Owner, (collectively, tne "Remedial Action Requirement"). 4. Th��a0S��Kap�R��advise the Ow ner � the Owner request Council reconsider the Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District of Maple Ridge written notice within fourteen (14)days ofthe date 0nwhich the notice under s.77 of the Charter was sent and that if any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for compliance (including adhering to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution), the District of W1op|e Ridge may take action in accordance with Seod0n 17ofthe Charter and undertake any orall Ofthe actions required bythe Remedial Action Requirement vvithDutfurtUernotice tOand atthe expense ufthe Owner, Resolution 3 Whereas Division 12OfPart 3ufthe Community Charter (the ^Chorter^)authorizes Council to impose m remedial action requirement 0n the owner or owners of a building including a requirement to have the building brought up to a standard specified by bylaw where: 1} Council considers that the building is in or creates an unsafe condition; and 2) Council considers that the building contravenes the Provincial budding regulations or a District bylaw under S.8(3)(|)(buildings and othorstructures). AND WHEREAS ]egdev Singh Athwo| is the registered owner h* "Owner") of a strata lot known as Unit#7. 11723 Fraser Street, K8ep|e Ridge, BC and |e8o(|y described as Strata Lot 7 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the o0m0un property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown Qffor0 1 (the "Strata Lot 7''): NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the Distric-t of yWep|e Ridge, in open meeting assembled.. resolves aafollows: 1. That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 7 is in and creates on unsafe condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(G) of the Charter as 0 result Of Strata Lot 7 oontrovenin�thm District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003' the 8C Building Code 2006. the District of K4e0|o Ridge� Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 41.11-1988. the Canadian Electrical Code Pert 1. 2006. the B'149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code and/or the BCFire Code 2OO8: 2� That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 7 is in e hazardous condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot 7 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 81180-2003. the BC Building Code 2006. the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111�1888. the Canadian Electrical Code PGt1. 2006'th8 6 149.1,05 N0tU,8| Gas and Propane |nSta||@Uun Code, and/or the BCFire Code 2D00. 3- That Council hereby requires pursuant to its remedial action powers under Part 3, Division 12 of the Charter that the Owner: a) agree in writing with the District's K4Gmoger of Inspection Services on a scheduled plan Of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot T including completion dates for certain works to, in the opinion of the Manager of Inspection Se^/ioee, ensure its safety and habitability in compliance with the standards specified in the District of Maple Ridge Building 8y\avv No. 6180+ 2ODB. the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No 4111'1988. the BC Building Code 20O6`the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2006,the B' 14S.1-O5 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Coda. and the 8CFire Code 2000' as identified in the Manager Of Inspection 8emioea' report dated February 16,20OQand the Fire Chi*f'areport dated March B'2O0Qnolater than fovrtoendays (14)days after notice ofthis remedial action requirement under s.77ofthe Charter has been sent bythe District ofMaple Ridge tothe Owner; b} commence the work set out inthe agreed plan and proceed diligently and in a timely manner in strict accordance with the dates set out in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution no later than twenty eight (28) days after notice of this oannediG| 8Cd8D requirement unders. 77 of\he Charter has been sent by the District oif Maple Ridge to the Owner; and c) complete all work set out in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3G) of this resolution and obtain fr0mthe District's Manager ofInspections confirmation in writing, that the work has been CQnOp|St6d to the Manager of Inspections' and the Fire Chief'seetisfaotion no later than ninety(9O) days after notice of thisremedial action requirement under a.77ofthe Charter has been sent by the District of K4mp|e Ridge tothe Owner; (coUeotivek\the"Remedio|Action Requiramont"). 4, That the District of Maple Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request that Council reconsider the Remedial Acton Requirement by providing the District of Maple Ridge written notice within fourteen (14) days of the date on which the notice under s. 77 of the Chet -ter was sent and that if any or all of -the aCU0nS required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for compliance (including adhering tothe completion dates specified inthe agreed plan pursuant t0section 3a)of this resolution), the District of Maple Ridge may take action in accordance with section 17 of the Charter and, undertake any or all of the actions required by Lhe Remedial Action Requirement without further notice toand a1the expense ufthe Owner. Wrounrom Whereas Division 12ofPart 3ofthe CommunhyCharter (the "Charter^)authorizes Council tn impose a remedial action requirement on the owner or mmnmm of building including requirement to have the building brought up to a standard specified by bylaw where: 1) Council considers that the building is in or creates an unsafe condition; and 2) Council, considers that the building contravenes the Provincial building regulations or a District bylaw under S.8(3)(|)(buildings and other atructur*s)' AND WHEREAS Jagdev SinghAthva| is the registered owner (the "Owner") of strata lot known as Unit#B. 11723 Fraser Street. K4op|e Ridge, 8C and legally described as Strata Lot 8 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata P\8A NVYB together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the Strata lot as shown ofform 1(the "Strata Lot 8^); NOW THEREFORE, the Council of t1a District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, resolves as follows: 1. That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot is in and creates an unsafe condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(a) of 'the Charter as e result of Strata Lot 8 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6188-2003' the BC Building Code 2000. the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111'1988. the Canadian Electrical Code Part Y. 2000. the B'1481-05 Natural Gas and Propane |nsta\|rtiunCode and/or the BCFire Code 2006, 2'That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 8 is in a hazardous condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Chatter 85 a result of Strata Lot 8 contravening the District of K48p|a Ridge Building Bylaw No. 0180-2003. the BC Building Code 2000' the District Of W18p|e Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw NO. 4111-1988. the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1. 2006, the B'149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane |Dato(|atiOn Code, and/or the BCFire Code 2008. 3. That Council hereby [e�juiroS punsuant to its nemeU|o| action powers under Part 3, D'vis:on 12 of the Charter that the Owner: e} agree in writing with the. District's Manager of |ne.peodon Services on a scheduled plan of naV8ir and reh@bi|b8ton of Strata Lot 8 including completion dates for certain works to, in the opinion of the Manager of Inspection Sorv|oes, ensure its safety and habiteoi|ity in compliance with the standards specified in the District of K4up|e Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6,180' 2OD3. the District ofMaple Ridge Firm Prevention Bylaw No 4111'1988,the BC Building Code 2006,the Canadian Electrical Code Pert 1, 2006' the B' 14S.1'05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code, and the BC Fire Code 2006. as identified in the Manager Of inspection Services' report dated February 1O, 2O09 and the. Fire Chief report dated March 9. 2009 no later than fourteen days (14) days after notice of this remedial action requirement undars. 77ofthe Charter has been sent bythe District ofMaple Ridge tothe Owner; b) C0pOm8noe the work set out in the @gr8ed plan and proceed diligently and in a timely manner in strict. accordance with the dates se-- out in the agreed pian pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution no later than twenty eight (28) days after notice of this rennedia\ action requirement unders. 77 of the Charter has been sent, bythe District ofMaple Ridge lothe Owner; and o) complete all work sat out in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution and obtain from the Dk�rict's Manager ofInspections confirmation in writing that the work has been completed to the Manager of Inspections' and the Fire 8hief'e satisfaction no later than ninety (QO) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Chat -ter has been sent by the District of Maple Ridge tothe Owner; 'collectively, the "Remedial Action Requirement"). 4, That the District of K4op|o Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request that Council reconsider the Remedial Acton Requirement by providing the District of Maple Ridge written notice within fourteen (14) days of the date on which the notice under S. 77 oi,� the Charter was sent and that if any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for compliance (including adhering to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3e) of this resolution), the District of Maple Ridge may take action in accordance with section 17oftheCharte[andundertakeenyora||of[heootiUnsre4uiredby1hoRemedio|Action Requirement without further notice toand otthe expense ofthe Owner. Resolution 5 Whereas Division 12 of Par 3of the CornmuniLyCharter (the ^Chorter")authorizes Council to impose a remedial action requirement on the owner or owners of building including a requirement to have the building brought up to a standard specified by bylaw where: 1) Council considers that the building is in or creates an unsafe condition; and 2) Council considers that the building contravenes the Provincial building regulations or a District bylaw under s.8(3)(|) (buildings and other otructunea)' AND WHEREAS Michael John Kwaeniva is the registered owner(-the"Owner'*') ofasLnata lot known as Unit#g. 11709 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge. BC and legally described as Strata Lot A of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NYV8 together with an interest in the Oo00OO property in pr0p0rtiVn to the unit entitlement of the Strata lot as shown nfform 1(the "Strata LotS'); NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled' rescives as follows: I_ That Council hereby nOmside/Sthat Strata Lot is in and creates an unsafe condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(o) of the Charter as o raauU of Strata Lot 9 contravening the District of W1a0|e Ridge Building By|aw No. 6180'2003, the BC Building Code 2000' the District of W1ep|e Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111'1988. the Canadian Electrical Code Port 1. 2008. the B'149.1-05 Natural Gas end Propane |nstaUat|OOCOde and/or the BCFire Code 2OOO; 2. That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot Q is in a hazardous condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot g contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 8180-2003. the 8C Building Code 2006, the District of K4apka Ridge Fire Prevention 8yl8vv No. 4111-198E\ the Canadian Electrical Code Pail 1, 2006, the E-149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane |DSta||atiOD Code, and/or the BCFire Code 20O6. 3. That Council hereby requires pursuant to its remedial action powers under Part 3' Division 12 of the Charter that the Owner: a) agree in vv/hjng with the District's Manager of Inspection Services on a scheduled plan of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 9 including completion dates for certain works to, in the opinion of the Manager of Inspection Services. ensure its safety and habitability in compliance with standards specified in the District of Maple Ridge Building B9|Bvv No. 6100' 2003' the District of K4ap|o Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No 4111-1888. the BC Building Code 2006.tha Canadian. Electrical Code Part 1' 2006,the B' 149.1,85 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code' and the BC Fire Code 2086. an identified in the Manager Of Inspection Services' report dated February 18. 2009 and the Fi/oOh|ef's report dated March 9, 2008 DO later than fourteen days (14) days after notice of this rernoU|@| action requirement Linder s.77ofthe Chertnrhas been sent bythe OisthcLofMaple Ridge 1othe b) Con1menmethe work set out inthe agreed plan and proceed diligently and in a timely manner in strict accordance with the dates set Out in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution no later than twenty eight (28) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter haaboenerntbytheDistdotnf-MGp|oRidgetotheOwner|ond o) complete all work set out in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3o) of this resolution and obtain from the District's Manager of Inspections confirmation in writing that the work has been completed to the Manager of inspecUona' and the Fire Chief's satisfaction no liater than ninety (90) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s.7Tofthe Charter has been sent Uy the District cfMaple Ridge tnthe Owner� (collectively, the "Remedial Action Requirement"). 4. That the District of Maple Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request -that Council reconsider the Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District of K4ap!e Ridge written notice within fourteen (1-4) days of the date on whicn the notice under S. 77 of the Charter was sent and that if any or QU of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified forcompliance (including adhering tothe oomD|oUon dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant 1osection 3e) of this resolution), the District of Maple Ridge may take action in accordance with section 17ofthe Charter and undertake any orall of+theactions reqU|red by the Remedial Action Requirement without. further notice to and o1the expense Qfthe Owner. Whereas Division 12 of Part 3 of the Community Charter (the "Charter") authorizes Council to impose a remedial action requirement on the owner or owners nfa building including requirement to have the building brought up to o standard specified by hy|avv where: 1) Council considers that the building is in or creates on unsafe condition; and 2) Council considers that the building contravenes the Provincial building regulations or District bylaw unda/o. 8(3)(1) (buildings and other structures). AND WHEREAS ]8gdev Singh Athvv@| is the registered ovvOe, (the "Owner") of G strata lot known as Unit #10, 11709 Fraser Strest, KAup|e Ridge, BC and legally described as Strata Lot iO of District Lot3g8 Group -1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NVVQtogether with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown ofform 1(the "Strata Lot1O"); NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting eaaernb|ed. resolves as follows: �ThatCounoU hereby considers that Strata Lot 10 is in and creates an unsafe condition within the meaning Of Section 73(2)(a) of the Chat -ter as e result Of Strata Lot 10 contravening the District of Maple Ridge, Building By|0vv No. 6180'2003' the 8C Building Code 2000. the District of K4ap|8 Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw NO. 4111-1988. the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1. 2006. the B-149.1-85 Natural Gas and Propane |nsto|)o1ionCode and/or the BCFire Code 2OO8. 2� 'That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 10 is in m hazardous condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot 10 contravening the District of yWmp|o Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180'2003. the 8C Building Code 2006. -the District of k0op|e Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988. the Canadian E|oCthoo| Code Part 1' 2006'the B-149.1'05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Omde, and/or the BCFire Code 2O00. 3. That Council hereby requires pursuant to its remedial action powers under Pell. 3, Division 12 of the Charter that the Owner: a) agree in vvhUnQ with the District's Manager of Inspection Services on a scheduled plan of napei[ and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 10 including completion dates for certain works to, in the opinion of the Manager of inspection Somioes, ensure its safety and habitability in compliance with the standards specified in the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 0180' 2D03.the District nfMaple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No4111'1988,the BC Building Code 2006.the Canadian BBCthC8| Code Part 1, 2000,1he B- 149.1-85 Natural Gas and Propane |DSt8||8ti0n Code. and the BC Fire Code 2006. as identified in the M8D8g8i Of Inspection Services' report dated February 16` 2009 and the Fire Chief'a report dated March 8. 2000 no later than fourteen days (1-4) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under e.T7ofthe Charter has been sent bythe District o[Maple Ridge tnthe b) oommencethe work set mutinthe agreed plan arid proceed diligently and in a timelv manner in strict accordance with the dates set out in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution no later than twenty eight (28) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent bvth�OiGtriCLOf��@p|8Rid�8tothe Owner; and C 1! complete all work set out |ntile agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution and obtain from the District's Manager of Inspections confirmation in writing that the work has been completed to the Manager of Inspections' and the Fire Chief'S satisfaction no |a1erthen ninety (yO) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent Dy the District ofMaple Ridge to the Owner-, (collectively. the "Remedial Action Requirement") 4. That the District of Maple Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request that COUnCU [eCDDSiUeythe R8n0eU1a| Action Requirement by providing the District Of K4Dp|8 Ridge weitten notice within fourteen (14) days of the date., on which the notice under s. 77 of the Charter was aentand that if any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for compliance (including adhe[in.g to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section. 3m) of this resolution), the District of Maple Ridge may take action in 3Cco[U8nC8 with section 17nfthe Chart erand undertake any orall ofthe actions required bvthe Remedial Action Requirement without further notice toand atthe expense ofthe Owner. Resolution 7 Whereas Division 12 of Part 3 of the Community Charter (the "Charter") authorizes Council to impose s remedial action requirement on the owner or owners of building including a requirement to have the building brought up to e standard specified by bylaw where: 1) Council considers that the building is in or creates an unsafe condition; and 2) Council considers that the building contravenes the Provincial building regulations O[a District Uy|avv under s. 8(3)(1) (buildings and other structures). AND WHEREAS Michael John Kwasn|oa is the registered owner (the "Owner") of strata lot known as Unit#11. 11709 Fraser Street, kHop}e Ridge, BC and legally described as Strata Lot 11 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NYVB together with ,an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement Vf the strata. \otas shown ofform 1(the "Strata Lot11''); NOW THEREFORE. the Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, resolves ssfo||ows: 1. That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 11 is in and creates an unsafe condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(a) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot 11 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw Pilo. 6180-2003, the BC Building Code 2006, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988, the Canadian Electrical Coce Part 1, 2006, the B-149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code and/or the BC Fire Code 2006; 2 "hat Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 11 is in a hazardous condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot 11 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003, the BC Building Code 2006, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988, the Canadian Electrical Cade Part 1, 2006, the B-149.1-05 Natural Gas and Fropane Installation Code, and/or the BC Fire Code 2006. 3. That Council hereby requires pursuant to its remedial action powers under Part 3, Division 12 of the Chartor that the Owner= a) agree in writing with the District's Manager of Inspection Services on a scheduled plan of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 11 including completion dates for certain works to; in the opinion of the Manager of Inspection Services, ensure its safety and habitability in compliance with the standards specified in the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6130- 2003, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No 4111-1988, the BC Building Code 2006, the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2006, the B- 149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code, and the BC Fire Code 2006, as identified in the Manager Of Inspection Services' report dated ebruary 16, 2009 and the l=ir°e Chief's report dated March 9, 2009 no later than four -teen clays (14) clays after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 rii the Charter has been sent by the District of Maple Ridge to the Owner; b) commence the work set out in the agreed plan and proceed diligently and in a timely manner in strict accordance with the dates set out in the agreed plan pursuant to section Sal of this resolution no later than twenty eight (28) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District of Maple Ridge to the Owner; and c) complete all work set out in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution and obtain from the Cistrict's Manager of Inspections confirmation in writing that the work has been completed to the Manager of Inspections' and the Fire C,hief's satisfaction no later than ninety (90) days after notice of this remedial action requirement cinder s. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District of Maple Ridge to the Owner; (collectively, the "Remedial Action Requirement."). 4. That the District of Maple Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request. that Council reconsider the Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District of Maple Ridge written notice within fourteen (14) days of the date on which the notice under- s. 77 of the Charter was sent and that if any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for compliance (including adhering to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution), the District of Maple Ridge may take action in accordance with section 170fth8Ch8rter@ndundortakeenyorai|CftheeCtionsraAoiradbyth9Remodhs|Aotion Requirement wiLhout further notice to and at the expense of the Owner. Resolution 8 Whereas Division 1-2 of Part 3 of the Community Charter (the "Charter") authorizes Council to impose a remedial action requirement on the owner o/ owners of a building including a requirement to have the building brought up to a si@DdGnd specified by by|ovv where: 1) CnUn0U considers that the building is in or creates an unsafe condition; and 2) Council considers d1@pthe building contravenes the Provincial building regulations or a District bylaw Linder s.B(3)(|)(buildings and other struoturen). AND WHEREAS Regina LuiSe Oe0kzSCh is the registered 0vYnar (the "Owner") of strata |o1 known as Unit #12, 11708 Fraser Street, KV8p|6 Ridge, BC and legally described as Strata Lot 13 0fDistrict Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NYV8together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown offurno 1 (the "Strata Lot 12''); NOW THEREFORE.the Council of the District of K4ap|o Ridge, in open meeting assembled, resolves asfollows: 1. That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 12 in in and creates an unsafe condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(o) of the Chat -ter as a result of Strata Lot 12 contravening the District Of K4@p|e Ridge Building By|avv No. 6180'2003, the 8C Building Code 2008, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1908. the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1. 2006. the B'149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane |nsba|ledonCode and/or the BCFire Code 20O6, 2. That Council hereby Considers that Strata Lot 12 is in a hazardous condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(U) of the Charter as a ruau|1 of Strata Lot 12 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 0188-2003. the GC Building Code 2006. -the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111'1888, the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2006. the B'140.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code, and/or the BCFire Code 2000. 3. That COUOCi| hereby reqUir8s pursuant to its r8UleU\8\ action powers under Part 3, Division 12Dfthe Charter that the Owner: a) agree in writing with the District's Manager of Inspection Services on a scheduled plan of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 12 including completion dates for certain works to, in the opinion of the Manager of |nSpeCdOD ServiCeS, ensure its safety and habitability in CO[np\|8DCe with the standards specified in the District of K8ap|8 Ridge Building Bylaw No. 0180~ 2003.the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No4111,1Q88.the BC Building Code 200G.the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1,200G.the B' 14S.1-0S Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code, and the BC Fire Code 2006, as identified in the Manager Of Inspection Services' report dated February 10' 2009 and the Fire Chiefs report dated K8a[Ch 0. 2009 no later than fourteen days (14)days after notice ofthis remedial action requirement under a.77ofthe Charter has been sent bythe District ofMaple Ridge {nthe h) commence the mm/k set out in the agreed plan and proceed diligently and in a timely manner in strict accordance with the dates set out in the agreed olan pursuant to section 3e) of this resolution no later than twenty eight (28) days QfLer notice of this remedial action requirement under S. 77 Of the Charter has been sent bythe District 0fMaple Ridge tothe Owner,:and c) complete all work set out |ntnnagreed plan pursuant to section 3a)of this resolution and obtain from the District's Manager ofInspections cOnfinne�on in writing that the work has been completed to the Manager of |ASp8cd8US' and t;he Fins Chief'asatisfaStion no later than ninety (90) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s'77ofthe Charter has been sent hy the District of Maple Ridge tnthe Owner; (collectively,"Lhe "Remedial Action Requirement"). 4. That the QisthoLof Maple Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request that Council reconsider the Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District of K8ap|a Ridge written notice within fourteen (14) days of the date on which the notice under s. 77 of the Charter was Sent and that if any Or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for compliance (including adhering to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution). the District of 01ap|o Ridge may Cmhe action in accordance with section 7 of Lhe "harter and undertake any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement without further notice toand atthe expense mfthe Owner. Whereas Division 12 of Part 3 of the Community Charter (the "Charter") authorizes Counc.1 to impose a nannedie| action requirement on the owner or owners of building including a regui[ennmnttO have the building brought up to a standard specified by hy|avv where: 1) Council considers that the building is in or Cn3aheG an unsafe condition; and 2) Council considers that 1he building contravenes the Provincial building regulations or a District bylaw unders. 8(3)(1)(hui|dings and other at/ucturea). AND WHEREAS ]mgUov Singh A1hwa| is the registered owner (the ''Uwne/'') of o strata lot kDDvvD as Unit #13. 11701 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge. BC and legally described as Strata Lot 3 of District Lot388 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NVVBtogether with an interest in the oonnnnon property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1(the "Strata Lot13~); NOW THEREFORE. the Council of the District of k4op|o Ridge, in open meeting assembled, re,solves.as follows: 1. That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 13 is in arid creates an unsafe condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(a) mf the Charter as a result of Strata Lot 1.3 oontnaveningthe District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 8180-28O3,tho SC Building "ode 2006, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111,1988' the Canadian Electrical Code Port 1. 2006' the 8'149.1~05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code and/or the BCFire Code 2006; 2. That Council hereby considers that Strata- Lot 13 is in a hazardous -condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Charter as e result ofStrata Lot 13 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003' the BC Building Code 2008, the District Of Maple Ridge Fire PnSY8DtiOn 8v|@w NO. 4111-1088. the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2006.the B'149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propene Installation Code, and/or the BCFi- re Code 2OOO. 3, That Council hereby requires pursuant to its remedial action powers under Part 3` Division 12 of the Charter that the Owner: e) agree in writing with the District's Manage/ of Inspection Services on a scheduled plan of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 13 including completion dates for certain works to, in the opinion of the Manager of Inspection SemiCgS^ ensure its safety and habitability in compliance with the standards specified in the District Of W18p|e Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180' 2003' the District of K4Op|e Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No4111,1Q88. the BC Building Coda 2000. the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2006. the B' 149.1'D5 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code, and the BCFire Code 2006. as identified in the Manager Of Inspection Services' repot dated February 16. 2009 and the Fire Ch|ef'o report dated March 9' 2009 no later than fourteen days (14) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s.77ofthe Charter has been sent bythoDistrict 0fMaple Ridge tOthe b8 commence the work set out in the agreed plan and proceed diligently and in a timeiv manner in strict accordance with the dates set out in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution no later than twenty eight (28) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under o. 77 of the Charter has been sent bythe District ufMaple Ridge tothe 0wner;and n) complete all work oel out in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution and obtain from the District's Manager of Inspections confirmation in writing that the work has been completed to the Manager Of Inspections' and the Fire Chiefs satisfaction no later than ninety (QO) days after notice of this /ornedia| action requirement mnders. 77 ofthe Charter has been sent by the District ofMaple Ridge tothe Ownar� (collectively, the "Remedial Actior� Requirement"). 4. That the District of Maple Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request that Council reconsider the Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District of Maple Ridge written notice within fourteen (14)days Ofthe date nnwhich the notice under S.7T of 'the Charter was sent and that if any or all of the act ions required by the Remedial AotiO0 Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for compliance (including aUherinp, to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution), the District of Maple Ridge may take action in accordance with section 17 of the Charter and undertake any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement without further notice toand at the expense of'the Owner. Re -solution 10 Whereas Division J-2 of Part 3 of the Community Charter (the "Charter") authorizes Council tc impose a remedial action qUi[emnn1on the owner Orownens of a building including a [8quirementto have the building brought up to a standard specified by bylaw where: 1) Council considers that the building is in or creates an unsafe condition; and 2) Counci| COnsiUenSthat the building contravenes the Provincial building regulations or District bylaw under s.8(3)(|)(buildings and other stnuctunaS). AND WHEREAS ]@gUev Singh ALhwm| is the registered owner (the ''Ovvn8/^) of a strata lot known as Unit#14, 11701 Fraser Street, Ma pie Ridge., 8C and legally doscribed as Strata Lot 14 of District Lot 398 Group 1 Now Westminster District Strata Plan NVV8 together with an |nterest in the oumonnon property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown ofform 1(the "Strata Lot 14"); NOW THEREFOK. the Council of the District of k4mp|e Ridge, in open meetingoasemb|ed. resolves asfo|\vwn: L That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 14 is in and creates an unsafe condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(m) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot 14 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 0180'2003. the BC Building Code 2000, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111,1988. the Canadian Electrical Code Part '., 2006' the B-149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane |nsL ||ationCodeand/orthe8CFireCVde2OOG; 2' That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 14 is in e hazardous condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Charter as a [8Su|t of Strata Lot 14 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003. the BC Building Code 2006' the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988' the Canadian Electrical Code ParL1. 2006' theB'14Q.1'05 Natural Gas and Propene Installation Code, and/or the BCFire Code 2OOG. 3. That Council hereby requires pursuant to its nornmdim! action powers under Part 3, Division 12ofthe Charter that the Owner: o) agree in writing with the District's Manager of |nepao1on Services on u scheduled plan of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 14 including CnCAp|et|80 dates for certain works to, in the opinion of the Manager of Inspection Services, ensure its safety and habitability in oonnp|iaOUH with the standards specified in the District of K4ap|8 Ridge Building 8y|ovv No. 6180' 2OU3, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No 4111,1988. the BC Building Code 2006, the Canadian E|notrioa| Code Part 1' 2008, the EF 14Q.1'O5 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code, and the BC Fire Code 2006. as identified in the Manager Of Inspection Services' report dated February 16, 2009 and the Fire Chief's report dated March Q. 2009 no later than fourteen days (14) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under o.77ofthe Charter has been sent bythe District ofMaple Ridge tothe Owner; b) commence the work set out iOthe agreed plan and proceed diligently and in atimek/maDnerinstrict accordance with the dates set out inthe agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolLFtion no later than twenty eight (28) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent bythe District ofMaple Ridge tothe Owner: and o) complete all work set out inthe agreed plan pursuant Losection 3o)of this resolution and obtain from the District's Manager ofinspections confirmation in writing that the *nrh has been completed to the K4enuge/ of Inspections' and the Fire Chief's satisfaction no later than ninety (QO) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s.77Ofthe Charter has been sent hy the District of Maple Ridge to the Own2lr; (collectively, the "Remedial Action Requirery"Ierit"'), 4. That the District of Maple Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request that Council reconsider the Rennedia| Action Requirement by providing the District of K4ap|e Ridge written notice within fourteen (14) days of the date or. which the notice under s. 77 of the Charter was sent and that if any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for comp|ianoe (including adhering to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) Of this resolution). the District of Maple Ridge may take action in accordance with section 17 of the Charter and undertake any or all of the actions required oy the Remedial Action Requirement without further notice tuand atthe expense ofthe Owner. Resolution 11 Whereas Division 12 of Part 3 of the Community Chatter (the "Charter") authorizes Council to imDume e nannedin| action requirement on the owner or owners of a building including a recuinernnnt10 have the building brought up to m standard specified by bylaw where: 1) Council considers that the building is in or creates an unsafe condition; and 2) Council considers that the building contravenes the Provincial building regulations oraDistrict bylaw unders. 6(3)(1) (buildings and other structures). AND WHEREAS Seen Douglas Meyers is the registered owner (the "Owner") of strata lot known as Unit#15. 11701 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC and legally described as Strata Lot 15 of DisthCt Lot 398Group I New Westminster District Strata Plan NWQtogether with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the s1rata lot as shown ofform 1 (the "Strata Lot 15''): NOW THEREFORE, the Council ofthe DiaLric-tnf K8up|e Ridge, in open meeting assembled. resolves asfollows: 1 That hereby considers Lot 15 is in and creates an unsafe condition ' � Charter t �resultof Strata Lot �5 within the meaning of Section 73(2)(e) of oe � result contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw NO. 8180+2003, the BC Building Code 2006. the District of K4Gp|e Ridge Fin* Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988. the Canadian Beo1rioe| Code Part 1. 2008, the B-149.1'05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code and/or the 8CFire Code 2006| 2' That Council hereby considers that Strat8 Lot 15 is in o hazardous condition within the -neaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot "L.5 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bv|Bvv No. 8180'2003. the BC Building Code 2000. the District of Maple Ridge. Fire Prevention vv �No. 4111-1988' the Canadian B� �rice| Code Part 1, 2006,the B-149'1'05 Natural Gas and Propene Installation Code' and/or the BCFire Code 2OO6. 3, That Council hereby requires pursuant to its remedial action powers under Part 3. Division 12ofthe Charter that the Owner: a) agree in writing with the District's K4anaQn, of Inspection Services on a scheduled plan of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 15 including completion dates for certain works to, in the opinion of the Manager of Inspection Services, ensure its safety and habitability |ncompliance with the standards specified in the District of K1op|e Ridge 8ui|UiO8 Bylaw No. 8180-- 2003.the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No 41I1,1988. the BC Building Code 2OO6.the Canadian Electrical Code Port1. 2008`the B' 149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code, and the BCFire Code 2086, as identified in the Manager Of Inspection Services' report dated Fobruary16. 2008 and1he F<reChief'o report dated March 9' 2008 no later than fourteen days (14) days after D01iCe of this remedial action requirement under s.77Ofthe Charter has been sent bytneDistrict ofMaple Ridge tnthe b) commence the work set out in the agreed plan and proceed diligently and in otimely manner instrict accordance with the dates set out inthe agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution no later than twenty eight (28) days after notice of this remedial action requirement undorm. 77 of the Charter has been sent bythe District ofMaple Ridge tothe Owner; and c) complete all work set out in the agreed plan pursuant tosection 3m) of this resolution and obtain from Lhe District's Manager of Inspections confirmation in writing that the work has been cumOp|8ked to the Manager of Inspections' and the Fire Chief'aautisfaotion no later than ninety (90) days after notice of this remedial action requirement undara. 77 of the Charter has been sent by the District ofMaple Ridge to�.heOwner; (ccllec'lively, the "Remedial Action Requirement"). 4. That the [hs1hot of Maple Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request that Counui| reconsider the Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District of Maple Ridge written notice within fourteen (14) days of the date on which th e notice Linder s. 77 of the Charter was sent and that if any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for compliance (including adhering to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section 38) of this resolution), the District of Maple Ridge may take action in accordance with. section 17 of the Charter and undertake any or ail of the actions required by the Remedial Action RequirenlBOtwithout further notice tUand at the expense ofthe Owner. Resolution 12 Whereas Division 12o[Part 3nfthe Community Charter (the ^Chetter)authorizes Council to impose G remedial action requirement on the owner or owners of 8 building including a requirement to have the building brought up to 8 stanUaoU SpoCiOeU by bylaw where: 1) Council considers that the building is in or creates an unsafe condition; and 2) 'Council considers that the building contravenes the Provinoia| building regulations or o District by|ovv unda/a. 8(3)(1) (buildings and other structures). AND WHEREAS ]agcev Singh A-thwa|is the registered owner (the ^{wner")of8strata lot known as Unit#1G' 11701 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge BC and legally described as Straka Lot16 of District Lot 398Group 1New Westminster District Strata PlanNW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, resolves as follows: 1- Tha Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 15 is in and creates an unsafe condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(8) of the Charter as a result 1 of Strata Lot 6 contravening the 0�Map le HiUg8 Building Bylaw No. S-18O'2UO3.the 8C Building, Code 2006. the District of Maple Ridge Fine Prevention Bylaw No. 4111,1988. the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1. 2006. the B'149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane installation Code and/or the BCFire Code 2D0@; 2 ThatCoumci| hereby COnsidorSthatStoata Lot 10 is in a hazardous condition within the meaning ofSendnn 73(2)(b) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot 10 contravening the District ofMaple Ridge Building Bylaw No 6180-2003. the 8C Building Code 2006,the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988, the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1. 2008. the B-148.1'05 Natural 8oa and Propane Installation Code, and/or the BCFire Code 20O6. 3. Tha.' Council hereby requires pursuant to its remedial oobOD powers under Pail 3, D'vision 12 of the Charter that the Owner: a) agree in writing with the District's Manager of Inspection Services on a scheduled plan of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 16 including completion dates for certain works to, in the opinion of the Manager Of Inspection Semioes,, ensure its safety and habitability in compliance with the standards specified in the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180- 2003. the District ofMaple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No 4112,1988' the 8C Building Code 2006,the Canadian Electrical Code Part.1' 2006.tho B' 149.1-O5 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code, and the BCFire Code 2006. as identified in the Manager Of Inspection Services' report dated February 16. 2009 and the Fire Chief's report dated March 9. 2808 no later than fourteeO days (14) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s'77ofthe Charter has been sent bythe District ofMaple Ridge tothe b) commence the work set out in the agreed plan and proceed diligently and in a timely manner in strict accordance with the dates se--- out in '-the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution no later than twenty eight (28) days after no[ioe ofthio remediel action requirement under a. 77 of the Chat -ter has been sentbythe District ufMaple Ridge tuthe Owner; and c) complete all work set out inthe agreed plan pursuant tOsection 8e)nfthis reso|uti0AanUobtainfromthoDisthot'eK4anagerof\nspectonsconhrmedon in writinp that the work has been completed to the Manager of Inspections' and the Fire Chisf'a satisfaction no later than ninety (gO) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under u.77nfthe Charter has oBensent by the District ofMaple Ridge tothe Owner; (collectively, the "Remedial Action Requirement") 4� That the District of Maple Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request that Council reconsider the Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District of Maple Ridgawri�ennodcew�hinfou�ern(14)days. ofthe date onvvhiohthe noboeunder s.77 of the Charter was sent and that if any or ai| of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed hvthe dates specified for compliance (including adhering tothe completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to 8eCdOO 3a) of this resolution), the District of Maple Ridge may take action in 8CCordaDos with section 1I of the Charter and undertake any or alp ot the actions required by the Remedial Action Reaui/ementwithout further notice toand etthe expense nfthe Owner. Resolution 13 Whereas Division -12 of Part 3 of the Community 'Charter (the "Charter") authorizes Council to impose a remedial action requirement on the owner or owners of a building including a requirement to have the building brought up to e standard specified by by|ovv where: 1) Council considers that the building is in o/ creates an unsafe condition; and 2) Council considers that the building contravenes the Provincial building regulations u/o District bylaw unders. 8(3)(|) (buildings and other structures). AND WHEREAS Jogdev Singh Athwa| is the registered owner (the "Owner") of strata lot known as Unit #17, 11715 Fraser Street, N1a0|e Ridge BC and legally described as Strata Lot 17 Of District Lot3S8 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NVV8together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown cfform 1(the "Strata Lot 17"); NOW THEREFORE the Council of the District of K4ap|n Ridge' in open noeedngaseemb|ed. resolves as follows: 1� That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 17 is in and creates an unsafe condition within the meaning of Sector 73(2)(a) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot 17 contravening the District ofMaple Ridge Building By|ovv No. 6180'2003' the BC Building Code 2006' the District of K4ap|a Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-1988. the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1. 2006. the B-149.1,05 Natural 6ea and Propane |qstai|3tiOnCode and/or the BCFire CVd82OO8; 2, That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 17 is in o hazardous condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Charter as result of Strata Lot 17 contravening the District OfMaple Ridge Building Bylaw No. G18O'2OD3.the BC Building Code 2006'the District of Maple Ridge Fire PnswaOt}on Bylaw No, 4111-1988, the Canadian Electrical "ode Part 1, 2006.the B-149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane inEta||8t|Bn Code, and/or the BCFire Code 2OD8. 3. That Council hereby requires pursuant to its remedial action powers umjsx Part 3, Division 12 of the Charter that the Owner: a) agree in writing with the District's Manager of Inspection Services on e ��hedu|ed plan of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 17 including completion dates for certain 'works to, in the opinion of the Manager of |ns��ttinn Services, onouna its safety and habitability in uump|imnoa with the standards specified in the District of Maple Ridge BUi|U|Dg By\Qvv No. 6180' 2003. the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No 4111-1988, the BC Building Code 2000'the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2006. the B- 149.1'05 Natural Gas and Propane Inato|iation Code, and the BC Fire Code 2006, as identified in the Manager Of Inspection Services' report dated February 16. 2009 and the Fire Chief's report dated K88roh 8, 2009 no later than fourteen days (14) days after notice of this rernedial action requirement under s.7Tofthe CharLerhas been sent Uythe District VfMaple Ridge tothe b) commence the work set out in the agreed plan and proceed diligently and in 8timely manner |nstrict accordance with the dates set out |nthe agreed plan punsuanttoaection3e)ofthiareao|utionno|ete/thantwentyeight(28)daya after notice of this remedial action raquiremnent under s. 77 of the Chatter has been sent bythe District ufMaple Ridge tothe Owner; and c) complete all work set out in the agreed plan pursuant Losection 3e) of this resolution and obtain from the District's Manager of Inspections confirmation in writing that the work has been completed to the Manager of inspections' and the Fire Chief's satisfaction no later than ninety (90) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under o.77ofthe Charter has been sent by the District ofMaple Ridge tothe Owner: (collectively, the "Remedial Action Requirement"). 4, That the District ofMaple Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request that Council reconsider the Remedial Acton Requ:nannmnt by providing the District of k8Gp|e Ridgevvrittenncl ice within fourteen (14)days 4fthe date 8nwhich the notice under o.T7 of the Charter was sent and that ifany orall of the actions required by the Remedie| Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for compliance (including adhering to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution), the District of Maple Ridge may take action in accordance with section 1Tnfthe Charter and underteheany urall ofthe actions required bythe Remedial Action Requirement without further notice tDand 8tthe expense ofthe Owner. Resolution 14 Whereas Division 12 of Part 3ofthe Community Charter (the "Charter^)authorizes Council to impose a remedial action raquirerieDt OD the owner Or owners of building including requirement to have the building brought up to a standard specified by bWevv where: 1) Council considers that the building is in or creates an unsafe condition; and 2) Council considers that the building contravenes the Provincial building regulations or a District bylaw under n.0(3)(|)(buildings and other struoturos). AND WHEREAS J8gdev Singh Athwa|isthe registered owner (the °Owner^)ofastrata lot known as Unit # 8, 11723 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC and legally described asStnata Lot 18 of District Lot 388 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NYV8 together with an interestin the common property in proportion tothe unit entitlement ofthe strata lot as shown of form I (,the "Strata 'Lot 18"); NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, reeo)veeasfollows: 1. That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 18 is in and creates an unsafe condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(o) of the Charter as a result of Strata Lot 18 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003' the 8C Building Code 2006. the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111'1988. the Canadian Electrical Code Port 11 2006. the 13'149.1'05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code and/or the 8CFire Code 200G� 2. That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 18 is in 8 hazardous condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Charter an a result of 51nsta Lot 18 contravening the District of K4op|e Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003, t1he BC Building Code 2006. the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention By|ovv No. 4111,1988. the Canadian Electrical Cone Part 1, 2008.the B-149.1,05 Ne1una! Gas and Propane Installation Code, and/or the BC Fire Code 2008. 3. That Council Nanaby requires pursuant to its remedial action powers under Part 3, Division 112 of the Charter that the Owner: B) agree in writing with the District's K8@D8ge[ Of Inspection Services on a scheduled p|80 Of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 18 including completion dates for certain works to, in the opinion of the Manager of Inspection Services, ensure its safety and habitability in compliance with the standards specified in the District of K8ep|o Ridge Building By|@m/ No. 8188- 2003. the District nfMaple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No 4111-19881.1he BC Building Code 2006, the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1. 2008, the 8- :149.1-05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code, and the BCFire Code 2006, as identified in the Manager Of |napwo1.on Services' report dated February 15, 2O89and the Fire Chief'm report dated March Q, 2009 no later than fourteen days (14)days after notice ofthis remedial action requirement under B,77Ofthe Charter has been sent bythe District CfMaple Ridge to the Owner; b) commence 'the work set out inthe agreed plan and proceed diligently and., in a timely manner in strict accordance with the dates set out in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution no later than twenty eight (28) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under a. 77 of the Charter has been sanLbythe District ofMaple Ridge tothe Owner; and o) complete all work set out in the agreed plan pursuant to aonbon3a} of this resolution and obtain frorn the District's Manager of Inspections confirmation in writing that the work has been completed to the K8ane§e/ of Inspections' and the Fire Chiof'm Satiafoot.on no later than ninety (90) days after notice of this remedial action requirement Linder s.77ofthe Charter has been sent by 'the District ofMaple Ridge tothe Owner: (ooOeotvely.the "Remedial Action Requiranlgnt"). 4. That the District of Maple Ridge advise the Owner that the Owner may request t�,at Council reconsider the Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District of Maple Ridge written notice within fourteen (14) days of the date on which the notice under s. 77 of the Charter was sent and that if any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for compliance (including adhering to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this resolution), the District of Maple Ridge may take action in accordance with section 17ofthe Charter and undertake any orall ofthe, actions required bythe Remedial Action Requirement without further notice toand atthe expense ofthe Owner. Whereas Division 12 of Part 3 of the Community Charter (the "Charter") authorizes Council to requirement to have the building brought up to a standard speCKed by bylaw whore 1) Council considers that the building is in or creates an unsafe condition; and 2) Council considers that the building contravenes the Provincial building (egulations or a District bylaw under s. 8(.3)(1.) (buildings and other structures). AND WHEREAS Mary Anti Rose Jones is the registered owner (the "Owner") of strata lot known as Unit#20, 11715 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BCand legally described as Strata Lot 2OofDistrict Lot 388Group 1New Westminster District Strata Plan NW8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot an shown of form I (the ''St/ate Lot 20"": NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, resolves as follows: 1- That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 20 is in and creates an unsafe condition with|n the meaning of Section 73(2)(a) of the Chatter as a result of Strata Lot 20 contravening the District of Maple Ridge Bui|dinri Bylaw/ No. 6180-2803, the BC Building Code 2008, the District of K4a0|e Ridge Fins proventinn By|@vv NO. 4I11-1988, the C8n8di3D E|BCt[iCG| Code Part 1, 2006' the B'149.1<05 Natural Gas and Propane Installation Code and/or the B0Fire CoUe20A9; 2� That Council hereby considers that Strata Lot 20 is in a hazardous condition within Vie meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Che-ter as a result of Strata Lot 20 nontoamaningthe District ofMaple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 0180-2003,the BCBui|din'Code 2006'the District Of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention By|@vv No. 4111'1888' the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2000`the 8-149.1-05 Natural Gas and ProPane Installation Code, and/or the 8CFire Code 2O08. 3� That Council hereby requires pursuant to its remedial action powers under Part 3, Division 12 of the Charter that the Owner: a) agree in writing with the District's Manager of Inspection Services On o scheduled plan of repair and rehabilitation of Strata Lot 20 including completion dates for certain works to. in the opinion of the Manager of Inspection Servioes, ensure its safety and habitability in compliance with the standards specified in the District of KXap|8 Ridge BU||UiDg 8y|avv No. 6180- 2O03.the District of KAGp|e Ridge Fire Prevention By|8vv No 4111,1988' the 8C Building Code 2006' the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 2006. the B' 148 1,O5 Natural Gas anal propona Installation Code. and the BC Fire Code 2006, as identified in the Manager Of Inspection Services' report dated February 10. 2009 and the Fire 'Ckief'a report doted March g, 2009 no later than fourteen days (14) days after notice nfthis remedial action requirement uDUerS.77Cfth8ChatterhasbeeAS6Rtbythe[}iStr|CtOfK4ap|eRidgetOthe b) commence the work set out in the agreed plan. and proceed diligently and in atimely manner instrict accordance with the dates set out iPthe agreed plan pursuant to SeudO8 3a) of this resolution no |ate[then twenty eight (28) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under 8. 77 of the Charter has been sent hythe Diat/iutufMaple Ridge tothe Owner; and () uonnp|8ta all vmMk sot Out in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of this in writing that the work has been completed to the Manager of Inspections' and the Fine Chief's satisfaction no later than ninety (gO) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s.77ofthe Charter has been sent by the District OfMaple Ridge tothe Owner; (.00Ueotivek(the "Remedial Action Requirement"). 4, Thotthe District of Maple Ridge advise, the Owner that the Owner may request that Council reconsider the Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District of Maple Ridge written notice within fourteen (14) days of the date on which the notice under s. 77 of the Charter was sent0no that ifany orall of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the detesspecified for compliance (including adhering to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section 3a) of 'this resolution), the District of Maple Ridge may take action in accordance with section .17 of the Charter and undertake any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement without further notice toand et the expense ofthe Owner. WHEREAS Division 12 of Part 3 of the Community Charter (the "Charter") authorizes Council to impose u remedial action requirement on the owner orowners of building including a requirement to have the building brought up to a standard specified by bylaw where. 1) Council considers that the building i5inorcreates anunsafe condition; 2)Council considers that the building contravenes the Provincial building regulations or a District bylaw under s. 8(3)(1)(bui|dings and cth*rst(uCtu/es); and/or 3)Council declares the building ismnuisance; AND WHEREAS JagdevSingh Aihwa|isthe re�stenedowner often strata lots known asUn�e #G. #S, #7 and #8. 11723 FreserStnee.` Maple Ridge, BC: Unit#1O, 11709 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BQUnits #13,#14and #16.117G1Fraser Street, Maple Ridge; Units #17and #1811715Fraser Stnyet`Maple Ridge, BCand legally described as: Strata Lot 5 of District Lot398 Group ' New Westminster District Strata Plan NVV8together with an interest in the connnoVn property in proportion to the unit entitlement Cfthe strata lot aashown ofform 1, ' Strata Lot 6 of District Lot 398 6[mU0 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NVV8together with @n interest in the 00rnnOon property in proportion to the unit antit|enoentofthe strata lot esshown offorrn1. ' Strata Lot 7 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan WVV8toQother with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement ofthe strata lot asshown ufform 1. ' Strata Lot 8 of O|SthC1 Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Strata Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the common property in proponiVn to the unit *nti1(ementofthe strata iotosshown nfform 1; ' Strata Lot 10 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement ofthe strata lot 8ashown Vfform 1| - Strata Lot 130fDistrict Lot 398 G0up1New WestnlinsLef DisLr,icL PlanNW8 together with an interest in the oOm0On property in pnJpnrtinn to the unit anUt|omentofthe strata lot seshown ofform 1; - Strata Lot 14 of District bt3SB Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 0VV8 �ogather with an interest in the C00001on property in ;pn}poM10n to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1: Strata Lot 16 of District Lot398 Group 1New Westminster District PlanNW8 wgather with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; ' St-ata Lot '17 of District Lot 398 Group I New Westminster District Plan NW8 tu,gedher with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; Strata Lot 18 of Dks-,hct Lot 388 Group .1 New Westminster District Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1; AND VVHEREAS Michael John Kwesnioa in the registered owner of two strata lots known as Units #9 ano #11, 11709 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC and legally describea as: - Strata Lot 9VfDistricl:Lot 398Group 1New Westminster District Strata Plan Nl08together with an interest inthe common, propeTtyin proportion to the unit entitlemcnt of the strata lot as shown of form 1: ' Strata Lot 1i of District Lot398 Group 1New WestminsterDistrictPlanNW8 together with an interest in the C00nn0n property in prnporbon to the unit entitlement of the Strata lot. as shown of form 1; AND VVHEREASRegina LuiseOemitzschiathe registered owner cf astrata lot known aaUnit #12. 11-709 FrnserStmaet K8@p|e Ridge, BC and legally described as Strata Lot 12 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the :ommonpropertyinp[OD0[tio0tOtheunitgOtit|erDentn[thes1roto|o1asahov/noFfornn1; AND WHEREAS Sean, Douglas Myers is the registered owner of e strata lot known as Unit #15' 11701 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge, BC and legally described as Strata Lot 15 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminszer District Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the c0mmunproperty iDproportion tothe unit entitlement Ofthe strata lot 8s shown 8fform 1; AND WHEREAS Sonia Athvva| is the registered owner of o strata lot known as Unit #19' 11715 FrmserStreet. K4ep|e Ridge, BC and legally described as Strata Lot 19 of District Lt 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NVV8togeth*r with an interest in the common property in proportion tothe unit 8ntit|ennentofthe strata lot asshown 0fform 1: AND WHEREAS Mary Ann Rose Jones is the registered owner of strata |[t known as Unit #2O, 11715 Fraser Street, Maple Ridge. BC, and legally described as Strata Lot20 of District Lot 398 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan NVV8 together with an interest in the common property in proportion to the unit entitlement of the strata lot as shown of form 1: AND WHEREAS the four buildings containing the Strata Lots referred to above |no|udeS common pnJperty (the "Common Property~) that is owned byJagdev Singh Athvva|. Sonia AUnwa|. Mary Ann Rose Jones, Michael John Kwasnica, Sean Douglas Myers and Regina LuioeOennitzsoh.astenants inoommoninproportion bJtAeunit entitlement ofeach oftheir strata lot, asshown on form I filed with Strata Plan NW-8 ("The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8): NOW THEREFORE, -the Council of the District of K4a[do Ridge, in open meeting assembled, resolves as follows� 5. That Council hereby considers that the Common Property iSinand creates Onunsafe CoOdUd0O within the meaning of Section 73(2)(a) of the Charter as o result nfthe Common Property contravening the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6_180- 2003, the BC Building Code 2008, the District of Maple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 4111-I988' and/or the BC Fire Code 2086; and the Canadian Electrical Code 2006 0. That C0uDC|| h8[Hhy considers that the Common Property is in e hazardous condition within the meaning of Section 73(2)(b) of the Chatter as a result of the Common Property contravening the District of K4mp|o Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180^2003. the BC Building Code 2O0G,the District ofMaple Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No. 41111, ' 1Q08.and/or the BCFireCode 28O6 and the Canadian Electrical Code 2086 7. That Council hereby declares that the Conn[nOn Property is a nuisance, within the meaning of Section 74(2) of the Charter, as Council considers the Common Property to be so dilapidated and unclean as to be offensive and pose a risk to the community, 8That Council hereby requires pursuant to iLs nennedia| action powers under Part 3. Division '.2ofthe Charter that The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8: a} agree in writing with the District's Manager of Inspection Services on a scheduled plan of repair and rehabilitation of the Common Prope�y including completion dates for certain works to, in the opinion of the Manager of Inspection Semicea, ensure its safety and habitability in compliance with the standards specified in the District of Maple Ridge Building 8y|avv No, 6.80- 2003, the District of &4ep|e Ridge Fire Prevention Bylaw No 4111-1988, the BC Building Code 2OOOand the BC Fine Code 2006, as identified in the Manager Of Inspection Services' report dated February 16, 2009 and the Fire Chief's repo� doted March 9. 2009 no later than thirty days (30) days after notice of this remedial action requirement under s. 77 of the Charter has been sent bythe District OfMaple Ridge k}The Owners, Strata Plan NVJ'8: b) commence the work set out ir the agreed plan and proceed diligently and in 'CoUeCtivekithe "Remedial Action RemuireDoe/t") 9, That the DistrictofMaple Ridge adiioe The Ownerm, Strata Plan NVV-8that The 0wners, Strata P|on NW-8 may requea1that Council reconsider the Remedial Action Requirement by providing the District of Maple Ridge written notice within fourteen (14) days of the date on which the notice under a. 77 of the Charter was sent and that if any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement is not completed by the dates specified for compliance (including adhering to the completion dates specified in the agreed plan pursuant to section 4a) of this resolution'). the District of Maple Rid,,,,e may take action in accordance with section 17 of the Charter and undertake any or all of the actions required by the Remedial Action Requirement without further notice to and at the 8X08DS8 of The Owners, Strata Plan NW-8. This page left intentionally blank CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6762-2010 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1, This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6762 - 2010." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 2 Section 10 and 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 72100 Lot 3 Section 10 and 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 72100 Lot 4 Section 10 and 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 72100 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1494 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 26th day of October, A.D. 2010. PUBLIC HEARING held the 19th day of July, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the 28th day of June, A.D. 2011. READ a third time the day of APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the PRESIDING MEMBER ,A.D. 20 . day of A.D. 20 . day of , A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER 1001 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No Map No. From: To 6762-2010 1494 RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) RS-1 b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) MAPLE RIDGE British Coi>>mhla N SCALE 1:2,500 MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: July 26, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: 5320-20/13IA Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council Maple Ridge Downtown Business Improvement Area EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council gave first reading to Maple Ridge Downtown Business Improvement Area Establishment Bylaw No. 6824-2011 on May 24, 2011. A notice was mailed to all affected property owners and published in the June 1 and June 8, 2011 editions of the News. Thirty days have elapsed after final publication of the notice and a petition in the form of an individual letter has been received from one owner representing one property. Second and third readings of this bylaw are therefore recommended. RECOMMENDATION: That Maple Ridge Downtown Business Improvement Area Establishment Bylaw No. 6824-2011 be given second and third reading. DISCUSSION: Council is proposing to undertake a local area service on its own initiative to grant money to the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association. The money granted will be expended on the planning and implementation of a business promotion scheme that includes the following activities and expenditures: a) marketing and promotions b) safety and security improvements c) beautification, including general clean up, graffiti removal, banners d) festivals and other related promotional events All of the grant paid will be recovered by means of a local service tax against all commercial properties (BCAA Class Code 6). The annual levy against all commercial properties within the Business Improvement Area will be as follows: 2012 - $193,500 2013 - $198,350 2014 - $203,300 2015 - $208,400 2016 - $213,600 1002 Page 1 of 2 The program ends on December 31, 2016. The levy for each commercial parcel will be determined on the basis of assessed value of land and improvements. Maple Ridge Downtown Business Improvement Area Bylaw No. 6824-2011 is attached and it is recommended that it be given second and third reading. Following first reading, a notice was published and mailed to all affected property owners. Thirty days have elapsed after final publication of the notice and .a petition in the form of an individual letter has been received from one owner representing one property. Council may proceed with establishing the local area service as this single petition is not sufficient to stop the process. In order for the petition against a local area service to be certified as sufficient and valid, a) the petition must be signed by the owners of at least 50% of the parcels that would be subject to the local service tax, and b) the persons signing must be the owners of parcels that in total represent at least 50% of the assessed value of land and improvements that would be subject to the local service tax. If two or more persons are owners of a parcel, a) they are considered as one owner only, b) they are not entitled to a petition unless a majority of them concurs, and c) unless a petition is signed by a majority of them, their signatures must be disregarded in determining whether the petition is sufficient. CONCLUSION: After reviewing the submission, staff has concluded that no sufficient petition against the project has been received. Second and third readings of this bylaw are therefore recommended. Prepared by: Ron Riach Acting Manager of Legislative Services t Approve by:"Paul Gill, B.S.A., C.G.A., F.R.M. Q(eneral Manager: Corporate & Financial Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: Maple Ridge Downtown Business Improvement Area Establishment Bylaw No. 6824-2011 Newspaper advertisement from The News Page 2of2 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6824- 2011 A bylaw to establish a business improvement area service to provide a grant to the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association for the planning and implementation of a business promotion scheme for the Maple Ridge Downtown Business Improvement Area. WHEREAS the Council of the District of Maple Ridge, under section 215 of the Community Charter, may grant money to an organization that has, as one of its aims, functions, or purposes, the planning and implementation of a business promotion scheme. AND WHEREAS all of the grant paid must be recovered by means of a local service tax; AND WHEREAS a notice of the intention of the Council of the District of Maple Ridge to establish a Business Improvement Area Service for the purpose of funding a Business Promotion Scheme to carry out certain works and services and to market and promote business within the Business Improvement Area, has been duly given by publication of notice and service of it upon the owners of the parcels liable to be specially charged and no petition against the works proposed on Council's initiative, signed by the owners of at least 50% of the parcels that would be subject to the Business Improvement Area Service tax, that in total represent at least 50% of the assessed value of land and improvements that would be subject to the Business Improvement Area Service Tax, has been presented within 30 days after the second publication of the notice; AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to proceed with the grant; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. TITLE This Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Business Improvement Area Establishment Bylaw No. 6824-2011". DEFINITIONS In this Bylaw: "Act" means the Community Charter, SBC 2003, Chapter 26; "Business Improvement Area" means the area of the District of Maple Ridge designated by Schedule "A" of this Bylaw; "Business Promotion Scheme" means those specific activities and expenditures set out in Section 5 of this Bylaw; "Council" means the Council of the District of Maple Ridge; and "District" means the District of Maple Ridge. "DMR BIA" means the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association; -1- 3. DESIGNATION OF AREA Those lands within the area shown shaded on the map attached to and forming part of this Bylaw as Schedule "A", are designated as a Business Improvement Area within the meaning of Section 215 of the Act and shall be known as the Downtown Business Improvement Area. 4. GRANT a) Council is hereby empowered to grant to the DMR BIA money not exceeding the following amounts: 2012 - $193,500 2013 - $198,350 2014 - $203,300 2015 - $208,400 2016 - $213,600 b) These monies shall be paid to the DMR BIA as follows: January 1, 2012 - $96,750 July 1, 2012 - $96,750 January 1, 2013 - $99,175 July 1, 2013 - $99,175 January 1, 2014 - $101,650 July 1, 2014 - $101,650 January 1, 2015 - $104,200 July 1, 2015 - $104,200 January 1, 2016 - $106,800 July 1, 2016 - $106,800 5. EXPENDITURE The money granted under Section 4 of this Bylaw shall be expended only by the DMR BIA, in accordance with the conditions and limitations set out in this Bylaw, and only for a Business Promotion Scheme consisting of the following activities and expenditures: a) marketing and promotions b) safety and security improvements c) beautification, including general clean up, graffiti removal, banners e) festivals and other related promotional events fi. RECOVERY OF FUNDS (a) All of the money granted to the DMR BIA pursuant to this Bylaw shall be recovered within the Business Improvement Area in the manner set out in this Section. (b) For the purpose of recovering the monies granted to the DMR BIA under this Bylaw in any year in which a grant is made to the DMR BIA, there shall be levied and imposed in each year on all land and improvements within the Business Improvement Area that fall within Class 6 of the Assessments - Classes and Percentage Levels Regulations, B.C. Reg. 438/81, as that regulation stood on January 8, 1988, a rate sufficient to raise the sums set out in Section 4 herein for that year. The levy shall be based on the assessed value of land and improvements for general municipal purposes. 7. CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS Notwithstanding any other provision of this Bylaw, no grant shall be made and no grant funds shall be used or spent by the DMR BIA, in any year unless the DMR BIA: a) submits an annual budget and work plan for approval by the District on or before January 1st in each year beginning January 1st, 2012; -2- b) submits to the District a review engagement on a fiscal year basis, and such auditor shall be a member, or a partnership whose partners are members, in good standing of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accounts, or the Certified General Accountants Association of British Columbia, or a person certified by the board established under Section 181 of the Company Act, RSBC 1996, Chapter 62. Such review engagement shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall include a Balance Sheet and a Statement of Revenue and Expenditure. A review engagement for the immediately preceding fiscal year, shall be submitted to the District on or before April 1st of each year beginning April 1st, 2011; and c) is a Society incorporated and in good standing under the provisions of the Society Act, RSBC 1996, Chapter 433 8. INSURANCE (a) The DMR BIA shall provide and maintain Commercial General Liability Insurance acceptable to the District and subject to limits of not less than five million dollars ($5,000,000) inclusive per occurrence for bodily injury, death and damage to property including loss of use thereof. The insurance shall cover any person employed directly or indirectly by the DMR BIA as well as any contractor or subcontractor hired by the DMR BIA. (b) The District shall be added as an additional insured under the Comprehensive General Liability Insurance policy, and the DMR BIA shall provide the District with a copy of the policy prior to the District providing funding under Section 4 of this bylaw. (c) The DMR BIA's Comprehensive General Liability Insurance policy shall contain a cross liability clause and an endorsement requiring that the District be provided with 30 days prior written notice of any change in the policy or its cancellation. 9. EXPIRATION DATE This bylaw shall cease to have effect on the 31St day of December, 2016. READ a first time the 24t" day of May, 2011. NOTICE was published on June 1, 2011 and June 8, 2011. DEADLINE for the submission of a petition against the service was July 11, 2011. READ a second time the day of , 2011. READ a third time the day of , 2011. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED the day of , 2011. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER -3- M 15 �� fit ni Q 1 _ - a vi Q IN'o ;� d' E 00 ep -- - L w �--�1.x�Nx�rt� � O i5 9zz nia-za—Z-3 91 Zi Y. I —1 ' ----------------- Lf t—I Q wl vu Lu I y E — x r a Y O l LLI Is J� �i �� Q' 1 a Q !r -° rs�rria a,Lo N N x W i8 N o cu -4- MAPLE RIDGE Bfil.h Cnlvmela The Council of the District of Maple Ridge gives notice that it is proposing to undertake a local area service on its own initiative to grant money to the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association that has, as one of its aims, the planning and implementation of a business promotion scheme forthe Downtown Business ImprovementArea (BIA). The business promotion scheme includes: A. Marketing and promotions B. Safety and security improvements C. Beautification, including general clean up, graffiti removal, banners D. Festivals and other related promotional events The Downtown Business Improvement Area includes all lands shown as shaded and within the boundary as shown on the following map. All of the grant paid to the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association will be recovered by means of a local service tax. The annual levy against all commercial properties within the Downtown Business Improvement Area will be as follows: 2012 - $193,500 2013 - $198,350 2014 - $203,300 2015 - $208,400 2016 - $213,600 If two or more persons are owners of a parcel, They must be considered as one owner only, They are not entitled to petition unless a majority of them concurs, and Unless a petition is signed by a majority of them, theirsignatures must be disregarded in determining whether the petition is sufficient; Petitions against the local area service must be presented to the Corporate Officer at the Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9 on or before 4:00 pm July 11, 2011. Copies of Maple Ridge Business Improvement Area Establishment Bylaw No. 6824-2011 are available for public inspection at the Reception Desk at the Municipal Hall during regular business hours. Inquiries regarding the business promotion scheme contemplated by Maple Ridge Business Improvement Area Establishment Bylaw No. 6824-2011 may be made to: Sandy Blue, Manager, Strategic Economic Initiatives 604-467-7319, or Ineke Boekhorst, Executive Director, Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association 604-467-2420 Based on the 2011 assessments, the annual cost to be charged to Ceri Mario benefiting property owners in 2012 is estimated to be $.645718 per Corporate Officer $1,000 of assessed value on both land and improvements in assessment class 6 (business). The program ends on December 31, 2016. 100% of the cost of the Business Improvement Area service, paid by the Districtof Maple Ridge to the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association, will be borne by the benefiting property owners located within the Business Improvement Area shown on the adjacent map. Council may proceed with establishing the local area service unless a sufficient and valid petition not to proceed with the program is received by 4:00 pm July 11, 2011 (30 days after the second date of the publication of this notice in the Maple Ridge News newspaper). In order for a petition against a local area service to be certified as sufficient and valid, The petition must be signed by the owners of at least 174 parcels (50% of the parcels that would be subject to the local service tax), and The persons signing must be the owners of parcels that in total represent an assessed value of at least$149,833,194 (50% of the assessed value of land and improvements that would be subject to the local service tax). - e�nVF Y I•q m 121 AVE ,, PURDE7 AVE CHURCH AVE - �. OR OWN AVE -.Y W y� N � 6 � - pgywNEY rHllNA Ilp _ MCIN7OSH AVE __-- MI:INTOS!! AYF FULLER AVE 119AVE w 1i§ARE fig AVE iQxm AVE SELAIRK AVE W � Lau O4v NV1t m ROYAL CR -Cl1FF-_AVE NORTH AVF cwr AYE WAVE p r iir AYE-- Y= y `s; 7rnNrre oar � � muter Ave � � } i2LLEY_ AVE _ C -CALLAGRAN AVE R1i y '- i16 AVE pp A, Schedule N �_ � Bylaw No. 6824-2011 M+ ' 19 so, '� Downtown Business lmprovemerN Area fl!eoaA,naeUuam®as �mgovpnwd AroamW 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 • Tel: 604-463-5221 • Fax: 604-467-7329 1 mapleridge.ca •r Deep Roots District of Maple Ridge Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: SUBJECT: Final Reading: Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6813 - 2011 Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6818 - 2011 23711 and 23735 132 Avenue July 26, 2011 2011-035-RZ 2011-035-CP COUNCIL Bylaws 6813 - 2011 and 6818 - 2011 have been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently were granted Third Reading. The applicant has requested that Final Reading be granted. The purpose of the rezoning is to provide a municipal park for the residents of the area. RECOMMENDATION: That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6813 - 2011 be adopted; and That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6818 - 2011 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on June 21, 2011. On July 12, 2011 Council granted Third Reading to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6813 - 2011 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6818 - 2011 with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed: 1. Amendment to Figures 2, 3C and 4 of the Silver Valley Area Plan in the Official Community Plan. The following applies to the above: 1) Amendments to Figures 2, 3C and 4 of the Silver Valley Area Plan are included in Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6813 - 2011. 1003 CONCLUSION: As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that Final Reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6813 - 2011 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6818 - 2011. Prepared by- Ann Edwards, CPT Sen ief,,Plp n n i ng Technician i Approve4by. Pic , MCP, MCIP ecto of Planning Approvegby: 'FranItgyinar', l�A, P.Eng � �` � G M : Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. L.'(Jim) Rule 1, Chief Administrative Officer AE/ The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Bylaw No. 6813 - 2011 Appendix C - Bylaw No. 6818 - 2011 -2- CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6813 - 2011 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Section 10.3, Part IV - Silver Valley Area Plan, Figures 2, 3C and 4 of the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6813 - 2011." 2. Figure 2 and Figure 3C are hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 23, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 48925 Lot 24, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 48925 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 807, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby redesignated to Neighbourhood Park, Medium/High Density Residential, Low Density Urban and Conservation. 3. Figure 4 is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 24, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 48925 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 808, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby added to Conservation. 3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 20 . READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 20 . 1003.1 READ A THIRD TIME the day of RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER , A.D. 20 . , A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER 'L� 9'� .627f�4 17 S 13321 9 13322 m e_3 n ry tin 7 28 15 2cj � � 4 23j311 16ryto N 44 4$ 46 47 48 49 50 � 13377 8 13316 � I by ` 23126 3 n 16 ' 15 '<A 30 3 23741 N LIMP 354 13313 13314 ,try 1d 3 12 23730 2 1 7 17 ^ LLIMP5467 a 8CP 29630 1 CP 631 31 23742 23743 13309 13310 71 L P J — 23687 1 a 6 18 8 9 ❑ 11 2 1 2_ 3 5 S 7 32 23745 21 22 23 24 6 27 28 29 J 13305 13306 g 23691 23746 23747 33 5 J' 19 n n n n m m m m m 4 13301 ry 1 23697 1 3 N N N N N LIMP 35468 u) a J w N N 132 AVE. 10 g m m 13292 i 2 3 4 56 11 BCP 9979 13282 -- BCP 19980 12 rn 9 a� 10 11 13276 12 13 Q d 13268 M m 23927 g 7 ai 14 13 13260 m m 23833 N N 15 13250 132 A AVE. 132 AAVE. OD m 15 � 14 16 13238 17 ^�,� 16 BCP 1 979 m PARK -- 13230 BCP 16892 _ 20 d 18 coBCP 9979 ' 13220 19 18 _ 19 a 177g&B 1' 13270 °' BCP 23304 132 AVE. / P 2637 Rem 1 A 13165 LMP 7404 EP 13725 A 13160 P 2637 4 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6813-2011 Map No. 807 From: Neighborhood Park, Conservation, Open Space, and Low Density Urban To: ® Medium/High Density Residential ® Neighborhood Park Q Low Density Urban ® C onservation MAPLEN SCALE 1:2,500 I a $CP 29630 J 1 2 3 I d5 w w N MOR:11 13160 I IF %j 17 �[� 2' � i' 5 ay1 .y'] 4 13321 I 9 13322 i0 15 a 73 ` '� "' i4 S ti 28 �3 ? 23j3� as 13317 13318 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 .° 16ry 29 4 \ 23�26 3 j 8 ^ 16 LMP 354 ' 15 �° 30 3 237g1 13313 7 i4 13314 17 14 13 12 , 23736 2 LMP 67 CP 31 ti 31 23742 23743 13309 13310 ua ` 8 9 0 11 z3687 ` 2 1 aL 6 18 21 L 22 P 23 24 55qq 25 9 27 28 29 6-7 5 32 23691 23745 I -� 13305 13306 � � n 33 23746 5 23697 1 3 4 13307 ry 20 ' N P N LMP 35468 132 AVE. P 2637 Rem 1 EP 13725 A P 2637 4 10 $ m 13292 1 2 F; 3 9 4 ry 5 N 6 11 BCP 9979 13282 BCP 19980 12 g , 10 11 co , 13276 rn 12 13 a a 13268 U 0] 23827 14 e 7 13 23833 13250 132 A AVE. 132 A AVE. m n rn rn 16 16 U 15 14 N BCP 1 979 13236 m 17 m PARK 13230 _ BCP 16892 20 18 a m BCP 9979 13220 19 ¢ 17 18 r/ W BCpl� — 19_ c a 13210 BCP 23304 132 AVE. --Tc� LMP 7404 "A' MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6813-2011 ,leap No. 808 Purpose: ® To Add To Conservation Q To Remove From Conservation 1 � MAPLE RIDGE I � � N Brifirrircclimmbia SCALE 1:2,500 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.6818 - 2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6818 - 2011." 2. That the parcel of land and premises known and described as: Lot 24, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster Plan 48925 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1520, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to P-1(Park and School). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the PRESIDING MEMBER day of ,A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER 1003.2 3321 17T 1y q27� ryp 1§3 4 133215 5 9 _ r ry�i8 23 4 23131 v 13317 N 13318 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 l 16 23120 3 M 8 a 16 LMP 354 v ! 15 , ,try '�30 3 23741 13313 n 13314 M 14 13 12P' 7513a 2 7 17 LMP 67 BCP 29630 CP 31 31 42 23743 13309 13310 d _ _ _ 7 6 18 chi P 23687 S 23 ¢ J 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 0 11 32 L�� 237451 13305 13306 � 21 22 23 23691 33 23746 23747 n n n m m m m m N s3 q N N N 23697 1 3 [ 4 13301 �7 20 N N N N N N N N N LMP 35468 10 3292 11 13282 1 2SS,' -- 32 BCP — 4°� 9979� 5iSH6 SCP 19980 12 rn g a\ 10 11 Boy '? 13276 ` 12 13 a a 13268 WO U w 23827 F 14 8 7 13 13260 23833 N 15 N 13250 132 A AV E. 132 A AVE. m m 01 m m 0) N N 16 15 14 m 16 U 13P38 BCP 1 79 m _ 17 co PARK 13230 BCP 16892 20 18 EL m BCP 9979 13220 19 r! 19 Q 17 B 1 Cp S d 9B m ' 3210 P 04 132 AVE. 132 AVE. N m P 2637 N N N „A" Rem 1 13165 LMP 7404 EP 13725 A P 2637 13160 4 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6818-2011 Map No. 1520 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) To: P-1 (Park and School) N SCALE 1:2,500 Deep Roots Greater Height, TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Final Reading: Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6707-2009 22525, 22515, 22505, and 22491 Brown Avenue July 26, 2011 RZ/O78/O9 COUNCIL Bylaw 6707-2009 has been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently was granted Third Reading. The applicant has requested that Final Reading be granted. The purpose of the rezoning is to permit the construction of a four -storey, wood -frame, 77 unit residential apartment building. RECOMMENDATION: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6707-2009 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on February 16, 2010. On February 23, 2010 Council granted Third Reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6707- 2009 with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed: 1. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; 2. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; 3. Road dedication as required; 4. Consolidation of the development site; 5. Removal of the existing buildings; 6. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking; The following nolies to the above: 1. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation has been received; 1004 2. A signed rezoning servicing agreement has been received along with a letter of undertaking from a lawyer to register the document; 3. A road dedication plan has been signed by the Approving Officer and a letter of undertaking has been received from the lawyer to register the plans; 4. A consolidation plan has been signed by the Approving Officer and a letter of undertaking has been received from the lawyer to register the plans; 5. The buildings have been demolished; and 6. A signed visitor parking covenant has been received along with a letter of undertaking from a lawyer to register the document. b) Additional Information: On February 22, 2011 Council granted First Extension. CONCLUSION: As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that Final Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6707-2009. Prepared by: tn'n Atkinson 1ng Technician pproved_by'"-,Jane Nei& ' , CP, MCIP Dire r oiflanning approved-ankqQuir�; IG[B7[, P.Eng --- GM: Public Works & Development Services t Concurre oe J. L. (Jim) Rule # �� Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Bylaw No. 6707 - 2009 -2- LMP 43240 LMS 4011 Parcel "A" 12148 (ECRA) NWS 1688 E P 61324 305 A P 46852 12138 12155 12129 E 1/2 11 P 7875 P 875 D y 6 7 8 9 -10 ry n 91 N ni 121 AVE. �, o . SUBJECT PROPERTIES O to N A N A N17 N19 20 LMP 34533 P 6�+ i 12085 LMP 44378 i� 12080 12063/65 rn M B � 2064 V) LMP 34533 � g o0 U- 00 0- 30 P 67041 Sea A EP 11502 aye 103 1 P 49778 N aa2ra3s P 4076 l McINTOSH 11955/65 fi8/70 14 w 4/ 76 N a cc u- City of Pitt Meadows N SCALE 1:2.000 District of Langley I` 0 N N LMP 46699 A P 8679 15 14 13 12 11 0 a N _ N n N N 24 P 1161 121 AU 12080 10 _ N 11 N '12 -1 N2 `"3 cc N 00 P 843 P 80 1 P 3OB1 P 843 9 8 7 6 5 4 12060 mmy N /62 N N N N N W o O N 4 d g 6 N LOT A 5 12038 P 11061 (P9687) *LMP1821 12018 LMP 19460 P 9687 P 303 A 2 1 P 44882 G *PP094 N N DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD uP 60451 N N N N N N N Rem. E ¢ Rem. Rem. CIDa) West Municipal Hall 118 117 3 Remco . 11995 P 60562 NWS 2403 0 81.5 4 Feet — 4 RCMP 2 P fi3 11990 11996 Z 00 I 22491, 22505/15/25 BROWN AVENUE / i of CORPORATION OF F.i THE DISTRICT OF i. MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 DATE: Nov 24, 2009 FILE: RZ/078/09 BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6707-2009 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6707-2009." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 11, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 8679 Lot 12, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 8679 Lot 13, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 8679 Lot 14, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 8679 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1468 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 121h day of January, A.D. 2010. PUBLIC HEARING held the 16th day of February, A.D. 2010. READ a second time the 231d day of February, A.D. 2010. READ a third time the 23rd day of February, A.D. 2010. APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this 16th day of March, A.D. 2010. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER , A.D. 200. CORPORATE OFFICER 61324 � � 875 T Q) p-� 6 7 g 9 °' P 121 AVE.CN 10.1 O Q) C 20.1 A 17 �18 �19 20 10 0 11 "'12 �I 20.T 00 � 0 P 8679 12085 P 8 81 se) LMP 44378 0- 72080 /65 ():� P 8679 P 8081 C/) 12064 o 533 Q 0 9 15 14 13. 12 11 9 8 7 00 o o h �` 11 ,74 ENN 3.5 o6 BROWN AVE. RP 798691-11 co o 0148 (LEASE) LP 69873 CD 0 4 5 6 1.9U4 ho `�j cL 120.36 P 8081 LP Rem. 302 6.1 P 45004 6,i 2 ' n9 12018 LMP 19460 P p-, 20.1 303 A P 44882 h SIN *PP094 RP 69394 DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD P 70955 1 O1 120-0 s O MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6707-2009 Map No. 1468 From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment) 1:1500 Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: July 26, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/093/06 Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COUNCIL SUBJECT: Final Reading: Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6580-2008 Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6581-2008 23000, 23024 and 23050 136 Avenue 1�7�i11j�►9�►��1 Bylaws 6580-2008 and 6581-2008 have been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently were granted Third Reading. The applicant has requested that Final Reading be granted. The purpose of the rezoning is to permit the subdivision into approximately 88 lots. RECOMMENDATION: That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6580-2008 be adopted; and That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6581-2008 be adopted. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on August 19, 2008. On August 26, 2008 Council granted Third Reading to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6580-2008 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6581-2008; and on July 28, 2009 Council approved a First Extension, and on July 27, 2010 Council approved a Second Extension; with the stipulation that the following conditions be addressed: 1) Department of Fisheries and Oceans approval for in -stream works and creek crossing in the southwest corner of the site; 2) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement including the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; 3) Amendment to Part IV, Figure 2 (Land Use Plan), Figure 3A (Blaney Hamlet Land Use Plan) and Figure 4 (Trails / Open Space) of the Silver Valley Area Plan of the Official Community Plan. 4) Registration of a Section 219 Covenant for a Geotechnical Report that addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; ill][IR 5) A Statutory Right -of -Way plan and agreement must be registered at the Land Title Office for the sanitary sewer system to be built from Foreman Drive and 136 Avenue; 6) Consolidation of the development site; 7) Park dedication as required; 8) Road dedication for site access purposes as required, including those portions of 136 Avenue and 231 Street south of 136 Avenue that will be located on the property north of the development site (23103 136 Avenue); 9) Construction of those portions of 136 Avenue and 231 Street south of 136 Avenue that will be dedicated on the property north of the development site (23103 136 Avenue), reconstruction of the portion of existing 136 Avenue from development site east to 232 Street to an urban standard, and construction of the emergency access road through the Park land at the southwest corner of the site. 10) Removal of the existing buildings; 11) A Section 219 Restrictive Covenant for the duplex design must be registered at the Land Title Office; 12) Pursuant to the Contaminated Site Regulations of the Environmental Management Act, the Developer will provide a Site Profile for the subject lands. 13) Construction of an equestrian trail through the Park along the south boundary of the site. 14) An Archaeological Impact Assessment for potential archaeological finds on the site is required and any recommendations or impacts to be addressed. The followin apolies to the above: 1. The applicant has provided the District with proof of notification to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans for in -stream works and creek crossings in the southwest corner of the site and on 136 Avenue. 2. A Rezoning Servicing Agreement has been registered on the title and the required securities have been received. 3. Amendments to Figures 2, 3A and 4 of the Silver Valley Area Plan are included in Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6580-2008. 4. A Restrictive Covenant has been registered on the title for the Geotechnical Report for 23000 and 23024 136 Avenue by Levelton Consultants Ltd. with a revised date of March 18, 2010, and another Restrictive Covenant has been registered on the title for the Geotechnical Report for 23050 136 Avenue by Levelton Consultants Ltd. with a revised date of July 14, 2011, that address the suitability of the sites for the proposed development. 5. The developer will be constructing a Sanitary Pump Station on the southeast corner of the adjacent "Nelson" property in lieu of connecting to the sanitary sewer at 136 Avenue and Foreman Drive. A Statutory Right-of-way has been registered on the title for the sanitary -2- sewer system on the site and to provide services to 23050 136 Avenue. It is expected that the sanitary sewer pump station will be removed in the future when a sanitary sewer connection is provided across the lands to the west to 136 Avenue at Foreman Drive. 6. The two properties owned by Portrait Homes (23000 and 23024 136 Avenue) have been consolidated and will be subdivided in the near future. The third property, owned by R. S. Chhina (23050 136 Avenue), will be developed separately and a Restrictive Covenant has been registered on the title for future subdivision and additional Park dedication of the site. 7. A Park dedication plan has been approved for dedication of the watercourse protection and natural features areas on Portrait Homes' property and on the lower portion of Mr. Chhina's property. Additional Park dedication will be provided on Mr. Chhina's site at the time of subdivision, as per the restrictive covenant noted above. 8. Road dedication plans have been approved for the dedication of road as required for access to the development site. 9. Construction of the new road dedication at 136 Avenue and 231 Street, reconstruction of the existing 136 Avenue from the development site to 232 Street, and construction of an emergency access road will be completed with the Rezoning Servicing works. 10. Confirmation has been provided that the existing buildings on the Portrait Homes property have been demolished. The existing buildings on Mr. Chhina's property are still occupied, and will be demolished at the time of subdivision, as per the restrictive covenant noted in #6 above. 11. A Restrictive Covenant has been registered on the title for the building design of the duplex - style fee -simple townhouse buildings on the RST (Street Townhouse Residential) zoned lots. 12. A satisfactory Site Profile has been provided for the subject lands. 13. An Equestrian trail will be constructed through the site from the southwest corner to the northeast corner. This trail will connect with the existing trail on 136 Avenue to 232 Street to the east, and with a future trail across the adjacent lands to the west to 136 Avenue at Foreman Drive. 14. An Archaeological Impact Assessment report was completed by Golder Associates on September 2, 2008 to identify and evaluate archaeological resources and potential impacts on them within the development area, and to recommend viable options for managing any potential adverse impacts to any identified sites. The report concluded that no archaeological sites were identified in the proposed project area, and that no further archaeological work is recommended. The developer was advised that if any unanticipated cultural materials or features are encountered during construction that all work should cease and the appropriate agencies are contacted. b) Additional Information: A text amendment for a new zone, RST (Street Townhouse Residential), was included with this application. This same text amendment also received Third Reading from Council on two other Rezoning applications (RZ/070/06 and RZ/54/02) for Eco-cluster development sites to the west of this site with the intention that it would be adopted by the application that proceeded to Final -3- Reading first. The RST (Street Townhouse Residential) zone was adopted with Bylaw No. 6643 - 2009 (RZ/054/02') on November 23, 2010, and therefore approval is no longer required with this bylaw. CONCLUSION: As the applicant has met Council's conditions, it is recommended that Final Reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6580-2008 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6581-2008. F Prepared by Ann Edwards, CPT en1or Planning Technician .fig, MCP, MCIP ctor gf Planning Approved bFran rnnn, MBA, P.Eng Public Works & Development Services 1 Concurrence:J. L. Jim} Rule til Chief Administrative Officer AE/ The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Bylaw No. 6580-2008 Appendix C - Bylaw No. 6581-2008 Appendix D - Subdivision Plan, Phase 1 for Portrait Homes Appendix E - Future Subdivision Plan, Phase 2 for Portrait Homes Appendix F - Future Subdivision Plan, 23050 136 Ave, Chhina's site 64 t�* 27 26 25 24 APPENDIX A N SCALE 1:3,000 N P 27885 76 79 78r 77 75 74 73 District of Pitt Meadows _ District of Langley I ` 0 23000/24/50 136 AVENUE f N � O 4 CORPORATION OF i o THE DISTRICT OF �f MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT �� DATE: May 29, 2008 FILE: RZ1093/06 BY: PC APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6580-2008. A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Section 10.3. Part IV - Silver Valley Area Plan, Figures 2, 3A and 4 of the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6580-2008." 2. Figures 2, 3A and 4 are hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 2 Section 29 Township 12 Plan 5116 New Westminster District And North 1,292 Feet Lot "B" Section 29 Township 12 Plan 5048 New Westminster District. And Lot 1 Section 29 Township 12 Plan BCP 29524 New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 757 , a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby redesignated as shown. 3. Figure 4 is hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 2 Section 29 Township 12 Plan 5116 New Westminster District And North 1,292 Feet Lot "B" Section 29 Township 12 Plan 5048 New Westminster District. And Lot 1 Section 29 Township 12 Plan BCP 29524 New Westminster District. and shown in heavy black line on Map No. 758 , a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, as added or removed from Horse Trail. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the 22nd day of July, A.D. 2008. 100501 PUBLIC HEARING HELD the 19th day of August, A.D. 2008. READ A SECOND TIME the 26th day of August, A.D. 2008. READ A THIRD TIME the 261h day of August, A.D. 2008. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of A.D. 20 . MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6580-2008 Map No. 757 PURPOSE: TO DESIGNATE AS SHOWN BELOW ON FIGURES 2, 3A & 4 AND TO DELETE THAT PORTION SHOWN ECO CLUSTER FROM CONSERVATION ON FIGURE 4 ECO CLUSTER CONSERVATION LOW DENSITY URBAN l- 1:3000 '8� 181 2 �0�' 1112�23 m218.0670LA�� h 0s o 0 136 AVE. o O N N q� "1 ti n' CP 27885 76 w 80 o 79 78 77 7 74 7 72 6 136 AVE.111 O b � h P 4 567 BCP 29524 P 14756 4.057 ha P 5048 P 5116 2 N 1292' B 2 4.047 ha, 2.044 ha. 4.303 ha. w w w 17 18 19 0.809 ha. 0.809 ha. 0.809 na. P 4 567 LMP 9042 2 3.51 ho MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMEND NG Bylaw No. 6580-2008 Map No. 758 PURPOSE: To Amend Figure 4 As Shown Below ■.■■■ Add Trail � Delete Trail MAPLE RIDGE British Columbia 1 :3000 APPENDIX C Cdil:�li7:7_ti:[�]►[�l�:a��l��::l[�t�lyuGll��l:�l_�ZN�I A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS„ it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6581-2008." 2. That Part 2 Interpretation is amended by inserting the following definition in the appropriate alphabetical location within the section: STREET TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL USE means a residential use consisting of one dwelling unit vertically attached to one or more dwelling units (i.e. a duplex, triplex, or fourplex) with each dwelling unit located on a lot abutting a street. 3. That Part 3 Basic Provisions is amended by inserting the following after Section 302, Zones (1): RST Street Townhouse Residential 4. That Part 6 Residential Zones is amended by inserting the following after Section 601C and renumbering subsequent sections accordingly: 601D RST Street Townhouse Residential Intent: The Street Townhouse Residential Zone is intended for use only within the areas of Silver Valley designated as Eco-Cluster. 1005.2 1.0 Permitted Uses Only the following uses shall be permitted in the RST zone: 1. Street Townhouse Residential Use 2. Duplex Use 3. Accessory Boarding Use 4. Accessory Home Occupation Use 2.0 Conditions of Use 1. A Street Townhouse residential use shall be permitted where no more than four street townhouse residential units are attached and located on a lot abutting a public street. 2. Vehicular access for lots backing on a Municipal lane will be restricted to the lane. 3. All motor vehicle parking areas must be fully enclosed within a garage structure. 3.0 Density The maximum permitted gross floor area of a unit shall be 223 m2 (2400 s.f.), specifically excluding basement, garage, and accessory building. 4.0 Lot Coverage The maximum permitted lot coverage shall be as follows: Lot Type Maximum Lot Coverage Exterior Lot 55% Interior Lot 65% Exterior Lot on Street Corner 45% Accessory Buildings & Structures: The maximum lot coverage for accessory buildings and structures shall be 3%, which shall form part of the maximum lot coverage for the entire lot. A detached garage is not considered an accessory building in this zone. 5.0 Height of a Building or Structure The maximum height of a principal building shall be 3 storeys or 11 metres, whichever is less. The maximum height of any accessory building or structure shall be 4.6m 6.0 Setbacks If building in this zone is next to an existing single-family development, then front setback must match that of single-family neighbourhood on same side of same street*. If building in this zone is not adjacent to single-family development, then buildings and structures shall be sited in accordance with the following minimum setbacks: Building or Structure Front Rear Interior End Lot/ Corner Lot/ Side Exterior Side Exterior Side Principle Building 4m 8m Om 1.5m 3m (no lane access) See #3 below Garage (no lane 6m N/A Om 1.5m 3m access) Principle Building 4m 14m Om 1.5m 3m (lane access) Garage (lane N/A 1.5m Om 1.5m 3m access) Accessory Building N/A 0.5m 1.5m 1.5m 3m or Structure 1. Interior Side: 0 metre permitted where listed above, provided that the full length of the interior side wall of the principle building and/or garage is adjoined to the full length of the interior side wall of a neighbouring principle building and/or garage. Where a fee -simple subdivision results in no common property ownership among the attached units, the property line will run equally distant through the attached interior walls. 2. On a lot with rear lane access: a) Each lot shall have useable rear yard private outdoor space with minimum dimensions of 6.5m x 7.5m that is defined by fences and landscaping. b) Accessory buildings larger than 5m2 are not permitted in the rear yard private outdoor space. c) A minimum 1.5 metre wide walkway must be maintained along the length of the garage, into the rear laneway. This walkway does not make up any part of the private outdoor space requirement. 3. On a lot with no lane access, the rear yard setback may be reduced to a minimum of 6 metres if the rear yard backs onto a greenbelt that is dedicated as Conservation Area or Park. 4. All accessory buildings and structures must be located in the rear yard. 7.0 Minimum Lot Size Lot Type Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Exterior Lot 234m2 9m Interior Lot 195m2 7.5m Exterior Lot on Street Corner 273m2 10.5m * In a neighbourhood where redevelopment is expected and the current zoning of the single- family neighbourhood in question is not consistent with the designation in the Official Community Plan, or the zoning matrix within the Official Community Plan, the front setback must match that of a zone that would be consistent with the current Official Community Plan. 8.0 Parking Requirements To be the same requirements listed in Schedule "A", under 1.0 b) for one and two family residential use in the Maple Ridge Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990. 9.0 Other Regulations 1. A Street Townhouse Residential use shall be permitted only if the site is serviced to the RT-1 zone standard, excluding road standards, set out in the Maple Ridge Subdivision Servicing Bylaw No. 4800-1993. 2. A Street Townhouse Residential use shall be permitted only if the site is serviced to the Eco-Cluster road standards identified within the Silver Valley Area Plan. 5. That Schedule "D" Minimum Lot Area Dimensions is amended by inserting the following under each heading: Zone: RST Minimum Width: See Section 601D, Item 7.0 Minimum Lot Size Minimum Area: See Section 601D, Item 7.0 Minimum Lot Size 6. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 2 Section 29 Township 12 Plan 5116 New Westminster District And North 1,292 Feet Lot "B" Section 29 Township 12 Plan 5048 New Westminster District. And Lot 1 Section 29 Township 12 Plan BCP 29524 New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line are hereby rezoned as shown on Map No. 1431, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw. 7. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 22nd day of July, A.D. 2008. PUBLIC HEARING held the 19t" day of August, A.D. 2008. READ a second time the 26t" day of August, A.D. 2008. READ a third time the 26t" day of August, A.D. 2008. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER 59 ��sf �� °� °� h ry ry 1 60 61 sus r� ro h h n h h rbs o 0.619 ha. 0 136 AVE. o O N N tri m y N Ty ry h � h h n CP 27885 76 h N a, 80 79 78 77 7 74 7 72 136 AVE. ai o ❑ P4567 q. 17 18 19 0.809 ha. 0.809 ha. 0.809 ha. P 4 567 8CP 29524 P 14756 1 7 ha P 5116 0' 2 B 2 0 h 1 2.❑d4 ha. 4.303 ho. 2 3.51 ho LMP 9042 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6581 —2008 Map No. 1431 From: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) To: RS-1 b(One Family Urban(medium density) Residential) 0 R-1 (Residential District) R-3((Special Amenity Residential District) RST(Street Townhouse Residential) • -.4 1 B 1 :3000 APPENDIX D SUBDIVISION PLAN OF PARCEL A SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 12 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN BCP_ _ _ BOGS 92G.028 SCALE 1 : 750 AlL OI6fANtf6 AME w YEmE6 AMO 1MiME0F «�..exprtN��w rtmlmn is�atm 114iNIIp Y�RLd6Fe_Ye_9_ort�e®a rc lr near nr Nii AL[II r.�u irsan oim ID wYm u�°6iamx mrowinn 136th AVENUE m m 76 75 74 73 72 ° PLAN BLFTr®5 x tm650 1SM19 ' w r� 1e� r e N mumrrw t k E 1,o ko 'Aa as t o 1aa hR „� eu.em:14 13 M12 N11 R10 �9 H m�aa 9�Y e m 15 �MM�m k 416e m2 16 r r' ---------------------- (PLE NUYPEAN61 O600-30-9a9) p _ 419.2 mt 17 ----------------- G 6TPM rROCPE59NE CONPIRYCTION LTD.. NC. NO. 74269 VIMESS OE ilw e s 37 ROAD a PARK DETAIL D SCALE: 1:20 i 36 r v k 35 ROAD DETAIL C PLAN 14756 ol1pP II` ROAD a L26 a..6 mx 18 , .yam A: r ao•I; PLAN Z.CP_ _ _ j ,09.6 mu 19 6L*� m2 20 a aE' � .93e m2 21 S 22 REM 10 PLAN 364DO PARK PLAN BCP_ - - � s6Jemz 1 7 3".6 m2 $ h 466.6 m2 2 e °s 6"p4gm■y w" & r ,.4 mr 3 i 5°lee1. x ,, 2 tirs Jf � 4 Amu a§ S,-' , m' 9 .' T'— 37 'pD �- e� SEE DETAIL D a m2 23 . K` si 4 m2 ___ DETAIL C t 3 n 3 6�mm2 22531: >I SEE DETAIL 0 ti 27 ■ 30 � fi1m 28 29 x PARK s12.2 m2 b a PLAN BCP- - - 6— m2 2 3 32 —..1 m' e N SCALE: 1:20 REM 1 -- SEE DETAIL A PUN 14756 PLAN KF29524 PCL 12' REM B (GI11832E) PLAN 5048 COWNANT PLAN BCP- _ _ LOT 'A' PLAN 5165 \27 a PARKOAD 'aZ _u 0101 M , m PRELIMINARY DETAIL B THIS PLAN UES WRHIN THE GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT — CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE SCALE: %0 PLAN BCP_ _ I � I o I / <. W I a� I ROD PLAN BCP425169 I - PARK T I PLAN BCP- - - I - I w w� al �� En of �I� N 4 I I I I r�>yf a REM 2 PLAN 5116 I a 40 e . 2.39 M I I I / i / N /q / / / PARK F �I PLAN RCP- _ - / PLAN 5116 PARK PCL '2' LOT 'A' REM B DETAIL A SCALL 1:20 R[�ew1M5 o6 �9f� APPENDIX E This drawing and design is the property of McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. and shall not be used, reused a reproduced without the consent of the said oompany. McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd, will not be held responsible for the Improper or unauthorized use of this drawing and design. 136th AVENUE PLAN 6CPT7ees 10 PLAN 38408 r J 76 75 74 73 72 136 AVENUE \v 13 12 11 10 9 PARK PLAN BW— 14 >3 T 15 PARKPLAN 16 2 7 8 3 1 � 17 5 �1756, 4 18 40 A C \ _ 19 39 �41 20 / 38 42 �\ 21 37 43 2 REM 2 PLAN 511E PLAN t1755 22 ROAD PLAN BCP— —— PARK 1 36 44 FUTURE 23 � — — 45 _ CHHINA SITE -- - -I 24 34 46 25 33 47 1 1 1I 26 32 48 27 49 30 31 PARK PARK I 1 I 28 2953 I I I \52 \51 \50 54 \ \ \� 2 55 \ \ PUN WP9a4T so � 57155 \ y y ,- 15s 15a \ y I I 1 ROAD � i T 61 73 f \ I I PHASE 2 I I 62 \\ 72 71 63 / } T-TT / 64 165 66 1 67 1 66 1 69 \ PARK I I I I PARK PLAN DCP— "B"�°`"--- GENERAL NOTES: - PRELIMINARY LAYOUT ONLY, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL. - AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO DETAILED SURVEY AND CALCULATION, AND MAY VARY. PLAN TO ACCOMPANY AMENITY COVENANT ON - NOT TO BE USED FOR LEGAL TRANSACTIONS. PARCEL A SEC 29 TP 12 NWD PLAN BCP_ _ _ EXISTING PROPERTY LINES SHOWN: EXCEPT: PART ON PLAN BCP_ _ _ SOLID FUTURE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN: DASHED — — — h McElhanney Scale: 1:1500 McElhanneyConsulting Services Ltd. Date: March 2g, 201 1 9 Job No.: 2112-07260 t13180' � BCE Dwg No.: 21 12-07260-2 7 APPENDIX F This drawing and design is the property of McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. and shall not be used, reused or reproduced without the consent of the said Compaq. McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. will not be held responsible for the improper or unauthorized use of this drawing and design. REM 10 PUN seeae P7axPNaBPUN,7s°' 73 72 136 AVENUE SEE NOTE A 136 AVENUE 12 11 10 9 PARK 2 PLw BcP- - - y PARK e PARK 3 T 2 PLAN 4 IMP--- � s 3 / 5 17567 18 19 5 — 6 PLAN PUN 43567 PUN QW7 4 40 O 7 39 41 O C\J 38 42 37 43 C' ROAD PLAN BCP--- PARK VSEE NOTE B 23 44 f — 45 24 35 — — 34 46 — 25 33 47 26 32 48 — 49 27 31 30 PARK 28 29 PUN BCP- - _ 51 50 52 55 54 60 159 158 57 \ 56 61 ROAD 73 62 /� 72 71 63 /�TT-F- \70\ L� / 64 I1 65 66 � 67 168 � 69 V C I l i REM 2 PUN 5116 — I — i 7--J TT NOTE A: I I I I SUBJECT TO PURCHASE/CLOSURE OF 110 19 18 I 136 AVENUE RIGHT OF WAY PARK NOTE B: T T SUBJECT TO REZONING AND 11 DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 2 PLAN I12 I13 I14 I LMP9042 AND LOT 17 PLAN 43567 j -j— --J- PUN I1P9011 ROAD T i I I 17 116 115 PARK PARK B13FRFTKE PLAN 9CP--- PL N BaP_ - - GENERAL NOTES: — PRELIMINARY LAYOUT ONLY, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL. — AREAS AND DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECT TO DETAILED SURVEY AND CALCULATION, AND MAY VARY. - NOT TO BE USED FOR LEGAL TRANSACTIONS. I� McElhanney McElhanney Consulting SwAms Lid. 7l1lDNIF�/1VBi8 lil�l � 1�� ►agryw�.s PLAN TO ACCOMPANY AMENITY COVENANT ON LOT 2 SEC 29 TP 12 NWD PLAN 5116 EXCEPT: FIRSTLY: PART DEDICATED ROAD ON PLAN BCP42569 AND SECONDLY: PART ON PLAN BCP_ _ _ Scale: 1:1500 Date: March 29, 2011 Jab No.: 2112-07260 Dwg No.: 2112-07260-26 M Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer DATE: July 26, 2011 FILE NO: E02-010-151 ATTN: Council Meeting Award of Contract No. ITT-EN11-34 216 Street and 128 Avenue Intersection Drainage Improvements EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The District's 2010 Capital Program includes provision for improvements to the intersection of 216 Street and 128 Avenue. Drainage improvements are planned for this location during the 2011 Fisheries window between August 1 and September 15. The improvements consist of culvert replacement, environmental remediation and asphalt pavement restoration. This work complements the signalization and street lighting improvements that were carried out here in the fall of 2010. Five tenders for the drainage works were received by the tender closure date of July 19, 2011. The lowest compliant bid of $189,460.20 excluding taxes was submitted by Mission Contractors Limited. It is recommended that the contract be awarded to Mission Contractors Limited. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Contract ITT-EN11-34 for 216 Street and 128 Avenue Intersection Storm Sewer Improvements be awarded to Mission Contractors Limited in the amount of $189,460.20 excluding taxes and that 15% contingency be allowed for quantity variations and unanticipated additional works, and THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Traffic signals and street lights were installed at the intersection of 216 Street and 128 Avenue in the fall of 2010. Further to these enhancements, drainage improvements are planned to be implemented during the August 1 to September 15 Fisheries window. The drainage improvements (Figure One) will involve the replacement of an old 750mm diameter wood -stave culvert with a 1350mm diameter concrete culvert. An existing 300mm concrete culvert will also be replaced with a larger diameter culvert that meets current design standards. 1201 } ,n Replacement Wnrk Figure One: Location of Planned Culvert Construction Tender results Five tenders were received and opened in public on July 19, 2011. These are listed below from lowest to highest price. Tender Price (excludin taxes). Mission Contractors Ltd. $189,460.20 Sandpiper Contracting $197,335.00 B. Cusano Contracting Ltd. $209,420.00 Directional Mining and Drilling $213,970.00 Double M Contracting Ltd. $385,363.22 Staff has reviewed the tenders and the lowest compliant bid was $189,460.20, from Mission Contractors Limited. b) Desired Outcome: The desired outcome of this report is to obtain Council approval to award the contract and proceed with the drainage improvements. c) Strategic Alignment: The Corporate Strategic Plan directs that the District provide high quality municipal services to our citizens in a cost-effective and efficient manner. The planned work supports this goal in that it will increase the drainage system capacity and ensure that the public is not inconvenienced or put at risk due to a structural failure of the old wood -stave culvert. 2 d) Citizens/Customer Implications: Construction will commence soon after the project is awarded and is anticipated to be completed in approximately six weeks. The road will remain open to traffic throughout the construction; however, traffic delays are expected. A communications strategy will be developed 'to ensure the travelling public is notified of the delays before they occur. e) Interdepartmental Implications: Project staff will discuss the communications plan for construction with the Communications Manager. A District Inspector will provide inspection services during construction. f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The drainage improvements are a component of the capital project to improve the intersection under LTC#4209 which was approved in 2010. The total project cost is within the approved funding. CONCLUSIONS: The tender price of $189,460.20 (excluding taxes) by Mission Contractors Ltd. for the 216 Street and 128 Avenue intersection drainage improvements is the lowest tendered price. Council approval to award the work to Mission Contractors Limited is recommended. Prepared by: -Gr-Maria Guerra, R Ppl pt Engineer Reviewed by: if` nbrev0ood, D., PEng. unictpal Engi eer Financial review by: Trevor Thompson, CGA Man�gpr, financial Planning I�ti Approved) by: ran dui-rrr, A, PEng. General Manager: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer MG/mg r Deep Roots Greater Heights District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: July 26, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: E02-010-073 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Regular Council Meeting SUBJECT: Award of Contract No. ITT-EN11-40 227 Street Road Improvements (Haney Bypass to North of Holyrood Avenue) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 227 Street Road Improvements Project from the Haney Bypass to North of Holyrood Avenue is in the District's approved Capital Program. The project objective is to improve safety on this roadway for pedestrians and cyclists. Safety will be improved by introducing traffic circles at the 116 Avenue and Holyrood Avenue intersections to encourage a reduction in vehicular speeds; constructing curb bulb - outs to improve sight -lines and reduce pedestrian crossing times; providing a dedicated bike lane on the west side; and replacing the existing east side sidewalk with a 3.0 m wide multi -use path. Almost all of the existing on -street parking will be retained. Tenders for construction closed on July 12, 2011 with three (3) bids received. The lowest compliant bid of $212,449.00 excluding taxes was submitted by Imperial Paving Limited. It is recommended that the contract be awarded to Imperial Paving Limited. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Contract ITT-EN11-40 for 227 Street Road Improvements (Haney Bypass to North of Holyrood Avenue) be awarded to Imperial Paving Limited in the amount of $212,449.00 excluding taxes and that 20% contingency be allowed for quantity variations and unanticipated additional works, and THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Several safety improvements will be implemented along 227 Street between the Haney Bypass and north of Holyrood Avenue (Figure One). Traffic circles and curb bulb -outs will be constructed at the intersections of 116 Avenue and Holyrood Avenue. These elements will slow vehicle traffic while improving driver's view of pedestrians waiting to cross the intersection. The 227 Street roadway will be narrowed by approximately 1.5 m south of Holyrood Avenue to accommodate a 3.0 m wide asphalt multi -use path on the east side. The multi -use path will be separated from the roadway by a curb and gutter. 1202 Cyclist safety will be improved through the installation of pavement markings that will delineate a dedicated bike lane on the west side of 227 Street between the Haney Bypass and Holyrood Avenue. Dedicated bike lanes will be marked on both sides of the roadway north of Holyrood Avenue. On -street parking will be maintained on both sides of the roadway except for a section on the east side from approximately 80 m north of Holyrood Avenue to the north end of the existing residential development (Figure Two). The loss of parking, necessary to accommodate the dedicated bike lane, was communicated at an open house held in February 2011. Residents adjacent the section of roadway where parking will be lost have also recently been notified by letter, with an invitation to contact the project manager with any comments or concerns. The project was designed by the District's Engineering Department and tendered from June 28 to July 12, 2011. Tender results Three tenders were received and opened in public as listed below from lowest to highest price. Tender Price(excluding taxes Imperial Paving Limited $212,449.00 Columbia Bitulithic $247,578.90 Winvan Paving Ltd. $296,837.00 It is recommended that the contract be awarded to Imperial Paving Limited. Figure One: 7 t Li Figure Two: Location where East -side Parking will be Eliminated b) Desired Outcome _-.41 The desired outcome of this report is to obtain Council approval to award the contract and proceed with the safety improvements. c) Strategic Alignment: The 227 Street Road Improvements Project supports the following Key Strategies identified in the District's Strategic Plan: • Maintain and enhance a multi -modal transportation system within Maple Ridge to provide citizens with safe, efficient alternatives for the movement of individuals and goods • Promote alternative modes (pedestrian, bike, public transit) of travel to reduce reliance on the automobile d) Citizens/Customer Implications: There have been two Open House hosted for this project. The conceptual design with proposed traffic circles was presented at the most recent Open House held on February 23, 2011. Positive feedback was received from residents on the proposed road improvements. Staff also met with the administrator of the Holyrood Manor in June of 2011 to provide an update on the completed design and planned construction schedule. The project is scheduled to take place between mid -August and the end of September. 3 e) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering staff have reviewed the traffic circle design with the Fire Department and addressed their concerns for fire truck turning movements. Project staff will discuss the communications plan for construction with the Communications Manager. A District Inspector will provide inspection services during construction. f) Business Plan/Financial Implications: The contracted works are within the approved budget for this project. There are no additional financial implications. CONCLUSIONS: The tender price of $212,449.00 excluding taxes, by Imperial Paving Limited for the 227 Street Road Improvements Project from Haney Bypass to North of Holyrood Avenue is the lowest tendered price. Council approval to award the work to Imperial Paving Limited is recommended. Prepared by, Richard Wow Manager of be&W & Construction ah.. - - Reviewed by. for dr ooTPD, PEng. unicipal E Financial review by: Trev&—r—Tffi56pson, CGA ` Mrag1r, Financial Planning l1 T 'j�, Ved by: Fra Qumn, MBA, PEng. C�e�eFal Manager: Public Works & Development Services r Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer RW/mi 4