Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2011-11-08 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdf
District of Maple Ridge COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA November 8, 2011 7:00 p.m. Council Chamber MEETING DECORUM Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are decided at Council meetings which affect many people's lives. Therefore, we ask that you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person's behavior will be reprimanded. Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.maplerid e.ca The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or resolution. 100 CALL TO ORDER 200 MOMENT OF REFLECTION 300 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS 400 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 500 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES 501 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of October 25, 2011 502 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of October 18, 19 and 31(3), 2011 and November 1, 2011 Page 1 Council Meeting Agenda November 8, 2011 Council Chamber Page 2 of 7 600 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL 601 Election Presentation - C. Marlo, Manager of Legislative Services and Emergency Program 700 DELEGATIONS 701 Shady Lane Delegation - Christina Wardroper and Jason Leemans. 702 BC Disability Games Presentation - Kathy Marshall, BC Disability Games Society Board Member - Jane Samletzski, Executive Director 702 Operation Red Nose - Bruce Livingstone, Operation Red Nose Community Liaison 800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 900 CORRESPONDENCE 1000 BYLAWS Bylaws for Third Reading 1001 RZ/116/10, 12393 203 Street, RS-1 to RS-1b Staff report dated November 8, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6793-2011 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to permit subdivision into three single family lots be given third reading Third reading 1002 2011-019-RZ, 10515 and 10595 240th Street and 23950 Zeron Avenue, correction of legal description Staff report dated November 8, 2011 recommending that second reading of Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871-2011 be rescinded and that the bylaw be amended to correct the legal address and be given second reading as amended. Council Meeting Agenda November 8, 2011 Council Chamber Page 3of7 COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE 1100 Minutes - N/A The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting. Public Works and Development Services 1101 2011-035-CP, 23735 132 Avenue Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6874-2011 to designate from conservation to medium/high density residential be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1102 RZ/008/09, 14155 Marc Road, A-2 to R-1, R-3, RST and RM-1 Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6877-2011 to permit subdivision into 33 R-1 (Residential District), 42 R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), 36 RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and 26 RST (Street Townhouse Residential lots for a total of 137 proposed units be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B, C, D, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1103 2011-082-RZ, 10150 and 10190 Jackson Road, RS-3 and M-2 to R-1 and RS-1b Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6861-2011 to permit subdivision into approximately 50 R-1(Residential District) lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. Council Meeting Agenda November 8, 2011 Council Chamber Page 4 of 7 1104 2011-097-RZ, 20337 Dewdney Trunk Road and 12025 203 Street, RS-1 to RM-2 Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6852-2011 to permit a future construction of a four -storey building with 20 apartments, with an under -ground parkade be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1105 2011-098-RZ, 12052, 12038 and 12032 - 223 Street; 12043, 12027, 12021, 12026, 12034, 12042 and 12052 Garden Street, RS-1 to G3 Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6870-2011 to permit a future mixed -use development be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C through E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. 1106 2011-114-RZ, 22810 113 Avenue, RS-3 to RM-1 Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6868-2011 to designate from Low Rise Apartment to Ground Oriented Multi -Family and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6869-2011 to permit development of 44 townhouse units be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A-H of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 1107 2011-037-RZ, 24311 and 24361124 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-2 Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6817-2011 to permit a future subdivision into four lots no smaller than 0.4 hectares be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 1108 2011-077-RZ, 27540 128 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-2 Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6848-2011 to permit future subdivision into two lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Council Meeting Agenda November 8, 2011 Council Chamber Page 5of7 1109 RZ/104/06, 10578 245B Street and 10601 Jackson Road, Final One Year Extension Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that a second and final one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/104/06 to permit subdivision of approximately 23 single family lots under the RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) zone. 1110 Club Climax - Liquor License Application - Extension of Hours of Operation Staff report dated October 17, 2011 recommending that the application by Club Climax at 11935 207 Street for an extension in hours of liquor service be supported. 1111 Scrap Metal Dealer Regulation Bylaw and Other Related Bylaw Amendments Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Scrap Metal Dealer Regulation Bylaw No. 6772-2010 be given first, second and third readings. 1112 Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that the use of municipal streets be authorized for the annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park on Saturday, December 3, 2011. Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police 1131 Temporary Borrowing Bylaw Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that Maple Ridge Temporary Borrowing Bylaw No. 6879-2011 be given first, second and third readings. 1132 Phone System Replacement Project Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that the contract for the installation and configuration of the District's phone system be awarded to Microserve. Report to be circulated separately. Council Meeting Agenda November 8, 2011 Council Chamber Page 6 of 7 Community Development and Recreation Service 1151 Gaming Revenue Funding Commitment Maple Ridge Social Planning Advisory Committee report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that a letter be written to the Minister of Social Development requesting a commitment by the Province to the BC Association for Charitable Gaming to disperse 33% of gaming revenues to charities in British Columbia. 1152 Street Trees in Silver Valley Staff report dated November 7, 2011 providing information on the street tree selection criteria. 1153 WildPlay Lease Rent Reduction Request Staff report dated November 7, 2011 recommending that the request to reduce the annual rental rate for WildPlay Maple Ridge for a period of 2 years be approved. Correspondence 1171 Other Committee Issues 1181 1200 STAFF REPORTS 1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL 1400 MAYOR'S REPORT 1500 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS 1600 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT 1700 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING Council Meeting Agenda November 8, 2011 Council Chamber Page 7 of 7 1800 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC 1900 ADJOURNMENT QUESTION PERIOD The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes. Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the information required to provide a complete and accurate response. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings, delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk's Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@ma I rid e.ca. Mayor and Council at ma orandcouncil@ma lerid .ca. Checked b Date: t (/1.r.76.3 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES October 18, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. DP/095/10 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 1, District Lot 404, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan BCP47825 11176 Gilker Hill Road Bluetree Homes (Gilker Hill) Ltd. Release of Statutory Right -of -Way BV90365 THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO DP/095/10. CARRIED J.L. (Ji ) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Mem er S � 1 � + I i ° 22 P 39988 + 112 A AVE. 1615 1240 ' N ' f 11230 11231 1 1 8 F- 11226 11227 N 11 F f 2 9 I 11220 N 11221 N 1 Rem 19 3v10 P 35398 1 ( 11216 U 11217 ( 4 m 11 I 11210 11211 0 02g� 5 12 112 A r`ni Q.e 11206 N 6 11207 PCI.'A' LMP26965 — — 11200 13 7 14 N 11195 BCP 42842 BCP 21397 1 11 a Q r.� BCP 47825 4 1 22 21 20 $C 12 53 776 23 N N M19,�18 17 16 s SUBJECT PROPERTY 24z�so ti N ry 0- Ln Rem 25 +� CV 11145 111 AAVE 26 11135 3m IE3- " P 2gg7 8 9 10 11 2 63 N N4 W5 w r P 1 1 2 315, 6 ilia M KPNPKPWPy Cift• ME N SCALE 1:2,000 P itt ws.J. District of - Langley _ "j - O 4 N 6N �7 N N 30 IN Mw 221,a9� 01 12 T. 21 �o r 20 - � 19 11176 GILKER HILL ROAD O Cn O CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF oMAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Oct 19, 2011 FILE: DP/095/10 BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES October 19, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. BRITISH COLUMBIA HYDRO AND POWER AUTHORITY Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary LEGAL: Lot 7, District Lot 5326, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan LMP41830 LOCATION: 14205 256 Street OWNER: BC Hydro & Power Authority REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Greywater Recovery System Covenant THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HYDRO AND POWER AUTHORITY. CARRIED LIS Fa ie ayor J.L. (Jim) u e, Chief Administrative ir Member cer Subject Propety I t42 AVE. at f Pitt Mea ows r : ; I 14205 256 St CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF N Dlstrlctof I MAPLE RIDGE Langley LICENSES, PERMITS & BYLAWS DEPT. SCALE 1:3,500 DATE: Oct 19, 2011 FILE: Untitled BY: JV FAASEA A. CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE October 31, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. 2011-089-RZ LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: 1kVi11►111.*j Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot 9, Block 5, District Lot 398, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan 155 22309 St. Anne Avenue Hiu Lee Release of Statutory Right -of -Way AB106826 THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO 2011-089-RZ. CARRIED J.L. (Jim Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Memb r 11768 O cm N N A N LMP 39631 LMS 3814 667 N 41 N BCS 3442 Rem N N N 32 N Rem N N Rem 31 30 29 28 P p 55 11739 9ti �Rem5 y ROM Rem y� 7 8 s M1 P 55 N 11683 P �55 4 5 N SCALE 1:1,500 -itadi P Mea oA P11527 - Rem 2 A CD P 76188 N N N CALLAGHAN AVE- EP 59768 Pd. A District of Langley NORTH AVE. F1174 N 4 N6 N Rem Remo Rem Rem Rem S 45 NCL 46 47 48 49 50 1144o co P 55 co 117 AVE. CD C\jM C\jco co M co coN N N r NC\j N N 27 26 25 1 M 22 21 20 SUBJECT PROPERTY P 155 J P 55 T 9 10 11 12 13 N 14 A- 16 z RP 53523 ST. ANNE AVE. Rem co O N N N *PP 76 p 11664 N N N N N 17 11654 22 21 20 19 18 11 T B P 115 A1165 RP 6192 -� P 82887 P 155 11641 P 16434 A 11 12 13 14 2 1 �/ C.")co N N C\jN PA !. NN CALLAGHAN AVE. 22309 ST ANNE AVENUE iU) I� i o CORPORATION OF i = THE DISTRICT OF 0 iMAPLE RIDGE .. - PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Oct 31, 2011 FILE: Untitled BY: PC CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES October 31, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. DP/107/05 LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lot B, Section 16, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan LMP30235 11744 236 Street 787 Developments Ltd. Subdivision Servicing Agreement THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENT AS IT RELATES TO DP/107/05. CARRIED J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member .3 CL Y IB w,r � r I ► �� ti 27 r1 i � _��:4" s i s,so >� HAL- - ,���� 7T1 .-` j 11798 ' �" 28i77;i • .�. n 1 2 ,r�yya,,. a 1` 1a N 1 0 20 �,2T 13c� 0992`• „735 EIPP 1U39e" V )W■ ,+� >�•' a lsrea 16 y 7,> 6 �6 11792 5 T �1 4� y ,y 1 `f 4V SUBJECT PROPERTY s T3 12 10 011, r :a • )� �I a. . l r ti 2 21 iIt ., -33 ROM „, ,_ 32 �+ I 31 jy� + « • �C r t3 . ,� � • � , � E1d28 -�•r N,14 y ry T "' a- ':'F District of _ Pitt Meadows; rValkw i 11744 236 STREET 0 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF tieney Down[avml !16 N District of I m -11 ��, �� MAPLE RIDGE Thh ho MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,500 DATE: Aug 18, 2006 FILE: DP/107/05 BY: PC River CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES October 31, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. 2011-010-DP LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lots 1 - 7, Section 24, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP_ 26280 126 Avenue Bosa Development Corporation Habitat Protection Covenant; Enhancement and Protection Agreement THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO 2011-010-DP. CARRIED r� J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Admini Mem)oer 31 20�0 e>o N PARK 32 33 LMP 1 30 20 LMP 731 PARK � 9ap1 1 1 21 e� s � �2sas 1z510 s s 22 s r7, 33 gip, �2555 19$g1 � iZ5s0 M Rem 34 U 2S2o Q `TOPS Q s m 3 12535 mU 9 N 5 h 2550 32 ^y LMP 975 4 7 8 31 SUBJECT PROPERTY LMP 697NW5 LMP 6975 18 LMP 75 12 25 26 0 2qs, ti LLMP g75 LMP 6975 LMP 975 LMP ry 24 27 29 19 20 21 22 12oai 17 17 LMP 6975 1247t LMP 6975 23 28 0 $ 2 12409 12428 fY 124 AVE. P 2854 BCP 546 6 RK 1 B B 36238 1 ,= LOT 31, P LAN LM P 19841 CORPORATION OF i l� ri THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE Ij PLANNING DEPARTMENT - L 1 `�'d• r —~�- DATE: Jan 27, 2011 FILE: 2011-010-DP BY: PC FRASER R CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS COMMITTEE MINUTES November 1, 2011 Mayor's Office PRESENT: Ernie Daykin, Mayor Chairman J.L. (Jim) Rule, Chief Administrative Officer Member 1. 2011-010-SD LEGAL: LOCATION: OWNER: REQUIRED AGREEMENTS: Amanda Allen, Recording Secretary Lots 1 - 7, all of Section 24, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan BCP_ 26280 12611, Avenue Bosa Developments Corporation Covenants: Geotechnical; Slope Stability (Lots 3, 4, 5 & 7); Sewage System Disposal (Lots 1, 4, 5 & 6); Sewage System Disposal (Lots 2 & 3) THAT THE MAYOR AND CORPORATE OFFICER BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SEAL THE PRECEDING DOCUMENTS AS THEY RELATE TO 2011-010-SD CARRIED r 4(JiRule, Chief Administrative Officer LMP 974 7 r6975 LMPB 17 1 M9 1L BCP 546 B W gig, IT 111 31 �26jo 26Qo PARK 32 ! c LOT 311 PLAN LM P 19841 U) T 06 CORPORATION OF V 1 ! _ THE DISTRICT OF ho - , MAPLE RIDGE f r 1 -d� i PLANNING DEPARTMENT P. e 'V DATE: Jan 27, 2011 FILE: 2011-010-SD BY: PC Operation Red Nam - Clerk's Department District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9 October 5, 2011 Pacific SPIRT We request permission to appear before Maple Ridge Council on November 8, 2011 to inform the Mayor and Council that Operation Red Nose will be operating in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows on the evenings of November 25, 26, December 2, 3, 9, 10, 16, 17 and 31, 2011. Last year, Operation Red Nose celebrated its most successful year of operation in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows: our dedicated group of volunteers drove nearly 10,000 kilometers to provide 353 safe rides home. We are expecting another busy year, and encourage the citizens and business of Maple Ridge to support by this worthy cause. Yours truly, r e Livi sto e Operation Red Nose Community Liaison PacificSport Fraser Valley Phone: 604-746-0605 Email: blivingstone@pacificsport.com �� S MISSION RECORD0 �.; A E01i S F 0 R0 � Kenneth A. Forcier, CGA Inc. CERTIFIED GENERAL ACCOUNTANT COUNTRYZ Cuu n— F.r—... .r� Irr � YS �Jl Im 702 Your Prine R vWgn 5iu6to District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 8, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/116/10 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Third Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6793-2011 12393 203 Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), to permit subdivision to three single family lots. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP). The application was forwarded to Public Hearing and to Council for Third Reading on August 30, 2011, proposing to rezone and subdivide the lands located at 12393 203 Street into three lots. Based on the concerns expressed by the surrounding residents to this application, Council deferred Third Reading until the concerns have been addressed by the applicant. This report summarizes the concerns expressed by the residents and how the applicant is proposing to address them. At the Public Hearing residents spoke against the development requesting a two lot subdivision with rancher style homes. The applicant has amended the proposal to rancher style homes but has not adjusted the application from three lots to two. The amended application remains technically consistent with the OCP. An alternative option is identified in this report on page 5 for Council's consideration. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6793-2011 be given Third Reading; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading. i. Road dedication as required; ii. Removal of the existing buildings; iii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations. 1001 iv. Pursuant to the Contaminated Site Regulations of the Environmental Management Act, the subdivider will provide a Site Profile for the subject land(s). 3. That the following condition be added to be met prior to Final Reading: V. Registration of a Design Covenant restricting the design of the proposed homes to a single -storey, rancher style home. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: 0788434 BC Ltd. Owner: 0788434 BC Ltd. Legal Description: Lot 80, District Lot 263, Plan 40628 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation Urban Residential South: Use: Residential Zone: RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: Residential Zone: RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Companion Applications: Residential Residential 0.18 HA. 124t'' Avenue Full urban servicing will be provided SD/116/10 and VP/116/10 -2- b) Project Description: The current application proposes to rezone the property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), to permit future subdivision into three single family residential lots. c) Resident Concerns from Public Hearing: The proposed development meets the policies of the OCP for Neighbourhood Residential Infill and Major Corridor Residential. However the surrounding residents were opposed to the proposed development due to the smaller lot sizes and potential for multi -level homes which would invade the privacy of the existing rancher -style homes on 124th Avenue. The letters submitted and statements at the Public Hearing speak to the proposed development not fitting with the existing character of the neighbourhood and potential traffic concerns. Many of the comments made were opposed to a three -lot subdivision, but would support a two -lot subdivision with rancher -style homes, as this would allow for larger street -fronting homes that would fit better with the character of the neighbourhood. d) Applicant Proposed Changes to Address Resident Concerns: In an effort to design the project to be compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood, the applicant is proposing to register a Building Design Covenant on Title for the three proposed lots, which would require rancher -style homes with quality exterior finishes. The applicant has also proposed a six foot high cedar hedge along 203 Street (see attached Proposed Streetscape, Appendix D). The applicant is not prepared to consider a two -lot subdivision, as was previously completed on the lands to the north, and would likely withdraw the application if it were determined that decreasing to two lots would be required. e) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The rezoning application is to rezone the above -referenced property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). The subject property is located within the Urban Area and is designated as Urban Residential. 203 Street is a major corridor; therefore the property is subject to the Major Corridor Residential Infill policies of the Official Community Plan (OCP). Major Corridor Residential Infill allows for building forms such as single detached dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhouses, apartments, and small lot intensive residential developments, with a maximum height of 2 1/2 storeys for all developments, with the exception of apartments, which has a maximum height of 4 storeys. -3- The proposed rezoning and subdivision for the three single detached dwellings meets the above - referenced policies. In addition, the lots are proposed to front onto 124 Avenue, across from two existing RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) lots. The subject property is not subject to the Neighbourhood Residential Infill policies of the OCP, or more specifically the Residential Infill and Compatibility Criteria (3.1.4). However, if it were, the proposed lots would comply with this policy which states "a change in the lot size and configuration is possible if the proposed lot area and widths should be not less than 80% of the lot area and width prescribed under the predominate or adjacent zoning in the surrounding neighbourhood". A Development Variance Permit, however, is required, as the applicant is proposing three lots with widths of 14.6 metres, whereas the minimum width required for the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone is 15 metres. Based on the concerns expressed by the residents, a two -lot subdivision with rancher -style homes would improve the development's fit with the existing character of the neighbourhood and streetscape of 124 Avenue. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 12393 203 Street from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit future subdivision into three lots. The RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone requires a minimum lot area of 557m2, a minimum lot width of 15m and a minimum lot depth of 27m. The three proposed single family lots comply with the zone requirements, with the exception of the minimum lot width, as noted below. Development Permits: A variance is being requested to reduce the minimum lot width from the required 15m to 14.6m, therefore a future Development Variance Permit report will require Council approval. Subdivision Issues: Council inquired about the potential of future subdivision of the larger lots on 124 Avenue, west of this site. A number of them are wide enough to subdivide as RS-1 lots (with 18 m frontages), but an existing building scheme restrictive covenant specifically prohibits the subdivision of these lands. The District is not a party to this covenant and so would not have to enforce its provisions; however, the Approving Officer could consider the covenant in exercising his authority and judgement on whether or not to support any possible subdivision. There are three lots (lots 81, 82, and 83) that conceivably have subdivision potential. For the most part, enforcement of the provisions of the covenant is a civil matter between the subdivision's lot owners. Council would only become involved if one of these lots sought to rezone to a smaller zone. Council can however, consider the nature of the current neighbourhood, streetscape, and lot pattern on 124 Avenue to grant or deny Third Reading for the current proposal. -4- f) Interdepartmental Issues: Engineering Department: Servicing works will be required at the subdivision stage, including road improvements, extension of the sanitary and storm sewers, street lighting, street trees, and watermain service connections. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional three trees, which is based on one tree per lot; final subdivision design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $75.00. Fire Department: The Fire Department has provided the Residential Structure Demolition Guidelines to the applicant. No other concerns were identified. g) Environmental Implications: The development will need to meet the requirements of the Watercourse Protection Bylaw with respect to rainwater and stormwater management, with Erosion and Sediment Control measures in place. The applicant will demonstrate how these requirements will be met at the subdivision stage. h) Alternative: Council could defer Third Reading and request that the applicant further revise the proposal to address the concerns of the surrounding residents. I'M CONCLUSION: The proposed development has addressed the concern of having multi -level homes overlooking the existing rancher -style homes of the neighbourhood; however, the size and number of the lots have not been altered. Technically the application meets the OCP requirements. Prepared by: Michelle Bast, AScT Planning Technician Approved by: Charles R. 90dard, BA, MA Acting ©tree or ofP&�nning Approved b� Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng GM: Publi Works Developrrien Services Concurrence: J. L. (Jlnr) Rule Chief Administrative Officer MB/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6793-2011 Appendix C - Proposed Subdivision Plan Appendix D - Proposed Streetscape Appendix E - 1972 Subdivision Plan WON A 3 —2 1 - -ry..� - APPENDIX A co m ^ h n N J 5 y N N N N N N N RP 168.j 124 N O O ON O O O p O N N N N A N v 12489 12494 12485 13 125 AVE. N 6 12488 28 ,2y PVE 14 N 15 12484 F 12486 0 N'ZO 12483 m 12 V 0 18 P 73431 13 P 7 31 3 7 a 27 NC11 1 4 LO 12 12486 7 � 12498 SK 12100 0� 24g a d o U) co 12 G 12468 2 (0. 11 11 ¢ 17 12491 0 8 N Ln N 12490 a� po 12&63 2 N 12476 12469 d 11 r 16 a 8 12451 -19 1 10 13 M 12481 12480 12464 LM P 61 0 14 N N 15 J 9 10 16 M P 72 64 a 31 12471 12470 P 7 431 N 5 24 1 2 3 4 Teas P 4 230 P 4062812433 N N o 1 2o3ge P 4223 78 6 30 87 88 89 90 91 124 B AVE. 1 12438 1242. 30 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY 7 29 `,b o 5 14 0 P 75 s N N 72064 a N 11 12419 2420 124 AVE. A B ✓�1 $ BCP15,97 2��� 12415 �x8� No 0 0 0 CC)12404 124AAVE. N N N N C 13 CD 80 12388 �, o 0 85 84 83 82 81 a 12393 1 M 1 Z o N N P 21555 a 10 12 11 N 9 P 4223 46 P 72 64 12387 P 78 25 l 55 P 21555 P 26 '90 7 22 P 15611 10 0 9 8 N 20324 42 43 44 45 52 M 53 ^ E 1504 $ $ o a 21 d o 0 0 0 0 0 12373 2p3LO �10 C0 1 N N N N N N 123 B AVE. 00 00 20 CHATWIN AVE. N Noy, O O O M Cl) NON M 8 Rem 7 1N2N N N j� 3 4 o 0 0 5 2351 Mo 1- P8190 p M N 325 N3 2 1 13 12 12345 76 P 85 40 a 64 0 22 P 1 706 P 1 08 52' 7 12332 1 P 43216 g0 p 17658 P 1 098 1909 P 37 62 12 3 3 2 1 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 N N r 2 � Rem 45 Rem 42 43 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 12327 12322 tNn N N N N N N N SQL N N LMS g 123 AVE. 910 -J m _ 3 N a 57 "LMP1350 N N N O O N N NO N N� N 12309 N 1 L--- 2 3 N 4 MP 5 59 aEi 5 6 7 8 �, 58 12301 12290 .o r City f Pitt Mea aws._ o 12393 203 STREET f CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF _ M MAPLE RIDGE N District of l Ie � PLANNING DEPARTMENT Lan SCALE 1:2,000 - - _�._ DATE: Dec 6, 2010 FILE: RZ/1 16/10 BY: PC APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6793 - 2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6793-2011." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 80 District Lot 263 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 40628 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1508 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 22nd day of February, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the 26t" day of July, A.D. 2011. PUBLIC HEARING held the 30t" day of August, A.D. 2011. READ a third time the day of RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of ,A.D. 20 . , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 125AVE + � ry 14 n 15 1 28 �zy .=� 12484 12486 q6� N 1 g P 73431 13 �—P 7 — 431 3 12483 a 12 K27 0 7 N a m 12 p❑ r 12486 7 12498 u, SK 12100 v i 12484 l d In o a cn a 17 L `n 12 lzasi o N 1 1 G 2 12asB m 11 8 o N 12490 12476 `r 11 12469 d 1ti ,2g61 13 i 16 ca 8 461 lzaeo 1 / 12451 1 9 10 12464 LMP 61 14 N N 15 a 9 10 i 6 cn �!f 12471 12470 P 7 31 N P 72 64 31 i P 40628 1 n 2 3 5 4 12465 12433 ^ q P 422 P 4 230 1 78 N N N N �p 7 88 89 90 91 1 1 124 B AVE. 6 30 12438 12as: I BCP 2 162 m 1 12430 244I 20 2BS cl 1 15 N I m 14 0 7 218 P 7534E N N N N f �2064 N a 12420 1241 124 AVE. 12419 B N 8 1 az�g I A BCP 2537 2p2g0 0 N 0 N m N N I N 12404 12415 124 A AVE. o 80 13 1238B 84 83 82 81 1 a f 12393 N 1 O N N 23 1 P 21555 a 12 11 N 10 9 124 P 4223 j 46 P 72 64 124, 12387 P 78 25 22 5 P 21555 P 26 90 P 15611 7 In 42 43 44 45 52 53 E 150' 10 0 9 0 8 N 20324 ao 124( n 4 0 o 21 ID N N N N N N N N N c`) N � 12373 N N N 20 6 123 B AVE. 32p N 11 122S CHATVVIN AVE. N t n 20 i�54 NN NN CM cj NN QN NN lN7 V j 2 N 3 45 1238!7' 2 N3 13 N 12 Nt'l 12351 P 9325 19 P85 0 a. 64 a P 1 706 P 1 Q85 S 52' 7 12332 1 P 43216 � Q P 7658 P 1 098 off 3 3 2 1 20 19 18 17 16 1151909 P 37 62 14 — — N M N 2 NIn Rem 45 Rem 42 43 i N N N N N N N N N N 12327 12322 c 123AVE. LMS ' I j 910 J O m N m N m "LMP135Qm 3 v o n f N MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 5793-2011 Map No. 1508 From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: RS— 1 b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) N SCALE 1:2,000 APPEN NX C O O O O o N N N h J Q U I O O S o o 0 9 0 APPENDIX D 21 a u F-1 .?4. G. FOX HOME PLANS INC. 12544 232 STREET ^F!K� MAPLE RIDGE, B.C. V2X 6T6 604-463-7007 H4MET 1NS WG 877-463-7007 APPENDIX E 1912 S��'"dwiiav, SUBDIVISION PLAN OF PART OF LOT 54 PLAN 4 2230 OF DISTRICT LOT 263 GROUP 1 PLAN 28176 Ft: 55754 3 E' NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT tx,ea lea ;n +ti` Ga^ Rep,.ir °u,� +n,�3ist d yaF_�gd-t ,rs 72� .SC L : 1 inch = loo f } 2l¢63 Plan t t Re%.once Plan 9�Lo _ N G] � • w 78 87 �� 88 B9 90 91 7 34 ass - a.szz ^ R m ki De+ail - Ae. A . Z o.s Ae, as Ae. o.s Ac. 7Ja - ° "� scale 1 v,rf, • 50 &e+ A n 35 =P� ROAD 67 &$ 36 osrs Ac. op - o � z N ri P 37 L; h 80 S AOA0 85 84 R 83 82 61 g --i A'. ey�47'`-WE ypW 4 /a 0.55E Ac. D.Sa1 Ac. 0. 52 Ac OSZ f%. a.SZ �C. Q 1 �c N D. L. 263 GP. 1 % -� � Fzan a5ss � 35 s w N a540 84 41 42 43 44 45 SL 53 e 15O s + pt- Z/ P/an 2LS9c Lot 4 ' CHATWIN ACE. r 4 L ye„d 0 o- ad ce-r pa4 f nd q d rde. 4Fe za d u siry .aet • °,P-old %nv+posl Jamd +�f _dam, pf Au�us �- 19j� /,jHC. Wad oFhkL-Rjypc B.C.BBrii/sh Cdumbla • lP 'Iron Post se}' card s,rr50r. —ih and saj ,+ter 1 ax e a� �� prescni a+ and d;d �'�"ar %niad -Z f�o�,; Plan zEi� �apP�wngorfKer-Erreer f7a✓an l dusY/es Lfd. survey n�xa Hied by Sp and that +>r. AldpE RtM M�nc,palhy cons✓•. The ea%d eurr� TMs �lan iK, w,x�n fne er„dnry � � � 19��Prfrdon+rr�._daler��-- Q( 5.wrn /x�iore �7n C.J. mbardf fhe Ro✓irre slu. woFe .a,a rwr� B_C- Gand 9 - Mapr :bi3e8 NL'skr:6.e - ........... ..................... bo s AF res4'r,'C14 c �" � �s, fiche ,,�l�i d►� e�.�s� T T. 42� -- District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 8,2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-019-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council SUBJECT: Corrections to Legal Description of Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871-2011 10515 240 Street, 10595 240 Street, and 23950 Zeron Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On October 25th, 2011 Council granted Second Reading to Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 6874- 2011. An error was recently discovered in the legal description of the OCP Bylaw which should be corrected. This memo outlines the steps necessary required to correct the mistake. The companion Zoning Bylaw No. 6864-2011 is correct and seeks the rezoning of the site above from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). Both bylaws are proceeding to Public Hearing on November 15, 2011. Correcting the OCP bylaw now will still enable the project to proceed to the earliest available Public Hearing date. RECOMMENDATION: That Council: 1. Rescind Second Reading of Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871- 2011; 2. Modify the legal description found in Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871 2011 by referencing only Lot 9, District Lot s 406 and 408, Group 1,New Westminster District, Plan 29456 and Parcel "A" (Explanatory Plan 16557); and adding the notation "From Urban Residential To Conservation on the Bylaw map; 3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871-2011 be given Second Reading as amended. DISCUSSION: An error in the legal description for Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871- 2011 has been discovered. The bylaw incorrectly referenced all 3 of the project's lots when it should have referenced only one lot; 10515-240 Street (Lot 9, Plan 29456). The bylaw map should also have noted for clarity the existing OCP designation of the creek area as existing Urban Rresidential. Although the error may not jepardize the integrety of the OCP bylaw because the accompanying bylaw map clearly outlined the creek area being redesignated to "Conservation", greater clarity can be achieved for the public if the bylaw is modified. Therefore, it is recommended that Second Reading of the OCP bylaw be rescinded, modified by adding the single lot (lot (, Plan 29456) and again granted Second Reading. This will allow the project to proceed to the scheduled November 15th 2011 Public Hearing. -1- 1002 CONCLUSION: It is recommended that Council rescind Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871-2011, modify it to include the correct legal description and then grant Second Reading to the amended bylaw. Prepared by. Charles oddard BA MA Acting D afar of Planning -2- CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6871-2011 A Bylaw to amend Schedules "B" & "C" forming part of the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 6425-2006 as amended WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "B" and "C to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6871 - 2011. 2. Schedule "B" and "C" is hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 9 District Lots 406 and 408 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 29456 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 816, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adjusting the Conservation boundary. 3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6871-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the 25th day of October, A.D. 2011. READ A SECOND TIME the 25th day of October, A.D. 2011. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 20 . READ ATHIRD TIME the day of A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of A.D. 20. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No Map No. From: To 6871 —201 1 816 Urban Residential C onservation N SCALE 1:2,500 Deep Roots Greaten Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 7, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-035-CP Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W First and Second Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6874-2011 23735 132 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The current application proposes an Official Community Plan Amendment to a small portion of land on the north-western portion of the subject property. The proposed Official Community Plan amendment seeks to re -designate approximately 0.07ha (700m2) of the subject property from Conservation to Medium/High Density Residential. I�X�iL�ilul�►U _ �>�� 1. In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; V. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; 2. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6874-2011 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 3. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6874- 2011 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6874-2011 be given First and Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 1101 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owners: Legal Description: OCP: Zoning: District of Maple Ridge District of Maple Ridge Lots 23 and 24, Section 28, Township 12, NWD Plan 48925 Existing: Conservation, Neighbourhood Park, Low Density Urban, Medium High Density Residential, Open Space Proposed: Conservation, Neighbourhood Park, Low Density Urban, Medium High Density Residential Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Proposed: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), P-1(Park and School) Surrounding Uses North: South East: Iyif[mi Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Single Family Residential RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), CD-1-93 (Amenity Residential District Medium High Density Residential, Low Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Low Density Urban, Conservation Single Family Residential RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Low Density Urban Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Medium High Density Residential, Conservation and Low Density Urban Single Family Residential Neighbourhood Park, Medium/High Density Residential and Conservation 1.204 hectares (2.96 acres) 132 and 133 Avenues Urban -2- b) Discussion On August 30, 2011 Council adopted Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6813-2011 which designated the area outlined in black on Appendix B, as Conservation. Based on the current information this sliver of land is not required to meet the 15 metre conservation dedication required for the protection of the unnamed creek located on the property. Therefore, the Conservation designation is not required and the 0.07ha portion of land located at 23735 132 Avenue may prove to have development potential in the future. In order to ensure the lands highest and best use this application proposes to amend the Official Community Plan to designate this 0.07 hectare portion of land as Medium/High Density Residential. It is envisioned that this land could, in the future, consolidate with the neighbouring property to the west and provide a comprehensive development plan based on the Medium/High Density Residential designation. The exact boundaries of the developable portion of this sliver of land will need to be determined through ground-truthing, with a future development application. W01INR1�111503 It is recommended that First and Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6874-2011 and that it be forwarded to Public Hearing. Prepared by: Sarah Atkinson Planning Technician Approved by. fC " rles R. Goddard, BA, MA /tin Dneanning Approved by: f Frank Quinn, MBA, P / n GM: Pu iic,Work Dev lopment Services Concurrence: J. L. (jim) Ffule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6874-2011 WIN -- APPENDIX A 5 .� g � 29 4 23�3� CD 13317 F 133185 M 44 45 46 47 48 49 y�2 1y 23�Ze 3 Lo 8 Co 16 g LM P 35466* 5 Ary ��9 30 3 23741 13313 Co 13314 14 13 m 12 � 31 23-738 2 7 17 23742 23743 13309 13310 23687 a 6 18 LIVIP 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 1 y4 21 22 23 24 25 6 23691 32 J 13305 13306 27 2 M m M rmi M 33 23746 SUBJECT PROPERTY " 19 °' m m w i1F {y N N N N N 23697 1 N 20 N Cl) N Co N Cl) N /=1�3AIE. , r 10 N m m 1 1 s292 1 N 2 N 3 N 4 13295 11 PA BCP 19979 13282 2 12 OD M 910 11 13275 13276 oho m s r p) 9 m 0ti 3 13 d d N P t8925 �• r" 13265 13268 C2 m 236 14 8 7 a C 4 Wa 13260 2383 3Co 13257 N 15 N 13250 132 A AVE. 5 / 24 13251 132 A AVE. m r� 23 N en 711 15 6 16 16 BCP 1 13238 13235 r 17 ARK 13 00 7 13230 n BCP 6892 r` r 13225 0- f A r 18 m BCP 9979 a8 m 13220 19 20 13215 18 Y 17 19 o Q n 93205 13210 d co N NCo 0 M N N N N 132 AVE. N m O O Co N N P 2637 N N „A" Rem 1 1 PP 7404 EP 137 P 2637 CI f Pitt Mea ows _� '` i F. 23735 132 AVENUE j.N I ` CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT O F N District of MAPLE RIDGE Langley �. PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Oct 31, 2011 FILE: 2011 035 CP BY: PC SCALE 1:2,000 _�` +' e FRASEF R. APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6874 - 2011 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Section 10.3, Part VI A - Silver Valley, Figures 2, 3C and 4 of the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE;, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6874 - 2011." 2. Figure 2 Land Use Plan and Figure 3C River Village are hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 24, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 48925 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 818, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby designated to Medium/High Density Residential. 3. Figure 4 Trails/Open Space is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 24, Section 28, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 48925 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 819, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby removed as Conservation. 4, Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of A.D. 20 . READ A SECOND TIME the day of . , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 20 . READ A THIRD TIME the day of A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER , A.D. 20. CORPORATE OFFICER 28 �zo 9 15 r r 29 �� 4 23731 1 v 13317 � 13318 44 45 46 47 48 49 isry �� g12$ 3 I m 8 a 16 15 6�ti �6 ��a 30 2 3 23741 13313 N 13314 LIMP 354 ' 14 13 ti� 12 23738 2 7 17 LMP 546 CP 31 31 23743 1 13309 13310 23742 8 9 10 11 23687 l� 2 1 1 6- 6 18 V I 21 L P ^� g 27 22 23 24 26 5 6 7 Lo 23691 32 —�— 23745 13305 13306 I nWi M v co m � 23746 I 5 h 19 J i m rn co t w m <mo rmi cwo cwo cmo 33 23747 M r�i c�i m r�i M m iw' c"1v N N N N N 23697 1 3 14 13301 N 20 N cm N N N N N r � LMP 35468 133 AVE. R10 w m w m 13292 1' 2 N 3 N 4 NPARK BCP 9979 11 13282 ' BCP 19980 12 c 9�10 11 13276 3 13 d a N ti 13268 � U $ P $925 I r 13265 m '3 1 F 14 8 7 603 m 4 ^ 13260 n E 23 13257 NL1325O 5 N N 132 A AVE. I 5 sn 13251 132AAVE. cD co 23rn 23 24 rn N c\j IL m T 15 m 6 ��:: N 16 f m BCP 13235 17 oo PARK 03 co 7 13230 r BCP 16892 13225 a q I d 18 m BCP 9979 IUm8 13220 1 20 1 13215 Y 17 18 B 19 o m Ll 13210 ° N ,/ N m r M 05 om N N N BCP 23304 M N 132 AVE. N 132 AVE. m NID m m co 04 N N MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6874-2011 Map No. 818 From: Conservation To: Medium/High Density Residential a N SCALE 1:2,000 qcr 28�c 5 2� 9 15 �y� c2x Z 237 37 44 45 13317 �'+ 29 4 f r 13318 46 47 48 49 \� 2 3 f `n 8 a 16 �6 30 3 15 23741 N LMP 3546 ' 13313 13314 Ary 14 13 z`�12 �� 2.3738 31 2 I 7 17 LMP 546 13309 13310 -- CP 31 L 23742 23743 _ 23687 } 8 9 0 11 2 a 6 18 to f 1 L P 5 — — 5 8 7 32 23745 21 22 23 24 2 6 27 j -� 13305 13306 n o rn r 23691 m 23746 5 h 19 J 1 m rn rn rn o o 23747 cu N co co N 33 co 14 13301 N 20 1 N 23697 1 3 N N co N co N M N co N LMP 35468 rmss 133 AVE. 10 N 1 13292 1 N 2 N 3 N 4 N PARK 13295 11 BCP 19979 ~ 13282 2 ` BCP 19980 12 0) 9 ��\\ 10 11 13275 13276 n rn O� \ 3 13 T a a N B P 8925 00 f 13265 13268 0 m 238 14 8 7 a 4 m a 13260 ^ M 238 13257 N 15 N N f� 13250 132 A AVE. I 5 f n 13251 24 132AAVE, � M 23 rn N a EL 16 w m T 15 16 d I En 6 No BCP 13238 E� 13235 17 PARK 7 13230 BCP 16892 r 13225 A 18 1 a m BCP 9979' $ 20 Im 13220 19 13215 19 y 17 QCpy �$ J g� 1 r I " 13205 i3210 N m N N N BCP 23304 N N 132 AVE. 132 AVE. m m NO ^ N N r N m m M N MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6874-2011 Map No. 819 Purpose: To Remove From Conservation N SCALE 1:2,000 40 Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6877-2011 14155 Marc Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: November 7, 2011 RZ/008/09 CofW An application has been received to rezone the subject property from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to R-1 (Residential District), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), RST (Street Townhouse Residential) and RM-1(Townhouse Residential). An Official Community Plan amendment is required to adjust the conservation boundaries. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. 1:7XK418181aN97_1111161016*3 In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: L The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv.- First Nations; v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6877-2011 be given First Reading; and; That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B, C, D, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Damax Consulting Owner: Falcon Crest Estates Legal Description: Lot: 3, Section: 32, Township: 12, Plan: LMP14126 1102 OCP: Existing: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Eco Clusters, Conservation A-2 (Upland Agricultural) R-1(Residential District), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) RM- 1 and RST (Street Townhouse Residential) Vacant A-2 (Upland Agricultural) Rural Residential, Eco Clusters and Conservation Single Family Residential R-1(Residential District) Eco Clusters Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Eco Clusters and Conservation Blaney Bog A-5 (Agriculture Only) Parks Within the ALR and Rural Residential Vacant Single and Multi -family Residential 30.102 HA. (74.38 acres) Anderson Creek Drive Urban Standard The subject property is characterized by slopes rising from west to east and by Anderson Creek and a number of unnamed streams running along the southern half of the property. Blaney Bog is located along the western border of the subject property and all development must respect the sensitivity of the bog. An existing Eco Cluster subdivision and a dedicated park with a trail network lies directly to the south of the subject property. Project Description: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to R-1 (Residential District), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and RST (Street Townhouse Residential). The applicant proposes to create 33 R-1 (Residential District), 42 R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), 36 RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and 26 RST (Street Townhouse Residential) lots for a total of 137 proposed units. The current development proposal will include a trail running along the western side of the subject property and connecting to the Anderson Creek trail network to the south. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. -2- c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: An Official Community Plan amendment is required to adjust the watercourse and natural features conservation boundaries for onsite ground-truthing. The Eco-cluster designation is intended to provide development opportunities in sparsely developed or rural areas, in a cluster form which supports sensitive implementation, minimal site regrading and tree clearing, and integration of housing into a forest setting. Eco-clusters are located in areas where topography is difficult, view impacts need to be minimised, and the existing rural character should be retained. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 14155 Marc Road from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to R-1 (Residential District), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and RST (Street Townhouse Residential). Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan, a Multi -Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. Pursuant to Section 8.8 of the Official Community Plan, an Intensive Residential Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal provides emphasis on high standards in aesthetics and quality of the built environment, while protecting important qualities of the natural environment. Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top of bank of all watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement for the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions for; • All areas designated Conservation on Schedule "B" or all areas within 50 metres of an area designated Conservation on Schedule "B", or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver Valley Area Plan; • All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent; • All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural Features Schedule "C" -3- to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Within the Silver Valley Area Plan, the Conservation areas are shown on Figures 2, 3 and 4. Advisory Design Panel: A Multi -Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to Second Reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. d) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Parks Department; e) School District; and f) Metro Vancouver. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading. The Parks and Leisure Services Department have identified that after subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the trail network in the parkland. The Manager of Parks and Open Space has advised that the amount required for maintenance will be identified and an increase in budget will be required. e) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B or Schedule C); 3. Multi -Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D); 4. Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); 5. Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G); 6. Intensive Residential Development Permit Application; and 7. Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The proposed rezoning to R-1 (Residential District), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), RST (Street Townhouse Residential) and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, however, an Official Community Plan amendment is required to adjust the conservation boundaries. It is recommended that Council grant First Reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6877-2011 subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. It is, therefore recommended that Council not require any additional consultation. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge's Approving Officer. Prepared by: Sarah Atkinson Planning Technician Approved by. C k Goddard /Mog Direr of Planning Approved b�, Frank Quinn, MBA, P M: Public rks Concurrence: ent Services J L. (Jim) Rule Y 01hief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6877-2011 Appendix D - Site Plan 16'M APPENDIX A District 'Langley• SCALE 000 SUBJECT PROPERTY In 6 C 14155 MARC ROAD o CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF ,0 MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT o-� -� �-� DATE: Feb 16, 2009 FILE: RZ/008/09 BY: PC APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6877-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6877-2011" 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot: 3, Section: 32, Township: 12, Plan: LMP14126 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1549 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1(Residential District), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), RST (Street Townhouse Residential) and RM-1(Townhouse Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER // \ PYROF N,n ON 'I DINE IN \ \ \ i U ✓tttso — _ _ — — — _ — _ _ _ — + + + 1 + 1 Q m 3, ' re + r 141 AVE. Psp F + r + r aem,o wi secPa,sN. RARKSIOE CRES •P � Z ERNE L + MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6877-2011 Map No. 1549 From: A-2 (Upland Agricultural) To: R-1 (Residential District) ® RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) ® RST (Street Townhouse Residential) MAPLERIDGEN SCALE 1:5,500 APPENDIX C F _ O m FT 1 S D m y, U W D C C Z C Z r O r r O O n Z n f7 O = 00 ., t- Q L� r r y- U -•f �� f [Yf Y:�o — IL R J�' • I r s fin 1 _ Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6861-2011 10150 and 10190 Jackson Road November 7, 2011 2011-082-RZ CofW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject lands from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and M-2 (General Industrial) to R-1 (Residential District) and RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6861-2011 be given First Reading; and; That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B, and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Damax Consultants Ltd Owners: Seyem' Qwantlen Land Development Ltd District of Maple Ridge Legal Descriptions: Lot: A, Section: 3, Township: 12,NWD Plan: EPP9830 Lot: B, Section: 3, Township 12, NWD Plan: BCP46878 OCP: Existing: Low/Medium Density Residential, Medium Density Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), M-2 (General Industrial) 1103 Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: South: East: hiRmi Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: R-1(Residential District), RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Park RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), M-2 (General Industrial) Conservation Vacant R-1(Residential District) Urban Residential Vacant R-1 (Residential District), RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential Urban Residential Park RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Agricultural Sand and Gravel (Vacant and Improved), Vacant Single Family Residential 4.12 hectares (10.3 acres) Jackson Road Urban Standard b) Site Characteristics: The subject site is located in the Albion neighbourhood along the southern border of the Albion Area plan and is adjacent to Urban Residential land to the south and east. The site is currently a gravel pit, with steep slopes over 30% primarily in the eastern portion of the property. Project Description: The applicant proposes to rezone the subject site to allow for future subdivision into approximately 50 R-1 (Residential District) lots. A very small portion of the north east corner of the site will be zoned RS-1b to be eventually consolidated with an RS-1b lot to the east. Approximately 1.46 hectares of steep sloping land will be dedicated as park, which will include a lookout area and a multipurpose trail connecting to existing trails to the north of the subject site. Portions of the site are proposed to be raised by fill from the re -grading of lands to the east. It will be necessary for the applicant to purchase the eastern portion of municipal property located at 10190 Jackson Road in order to proceed with this development application. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject site is located in the Albion Area Plan. Approximately 75% of the site is designated Low/Medium Density Residential, while the remainder is designated Medium Density Residential. These Official Community Plan designations permit single detached housing form located in the Albion Area. The R - 1 (Residential District) zone is in compliance with the Medium Density -2- Residential designation, but not the Low/Medium Density Residential designation. Due to the Urban Residential designation to the south and east of the subject site, and the R-1 subdivision application (Jackson Farm- SD/040/09) currently active on the property, justification has been provided to support an OCP amendment to re -designate the Low/Medium Density Residential land to Medium Density Residential on the subject site. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 10150 and 10190 Jackson Road from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and M-2 (General Industrial) to R-1 (Residential District) and RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit future subdivision into single family homes. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for development and subdivision activity on lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent. The Natural Features Development Permit ensures the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. d) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Building Department; d) Fire Department; e) Parks Department; f) School District The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading. e) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); 3. Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G); 4. Subdivision Application -3- The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is not in compliance with the Official Community Plan, however, justification has been provided to support an Official Community Plan amendment. It is, therefore, recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. It is, therefore recommended that Council not require any additional consultation. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge's Approving Officer. Prepared by: Amelia Bowden Planning Technician G 7 �11�z/ a&-J Approved by: Charles Goddard, BA, MA ,�ActinA-f)irecW ,P)anning Approved by f Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng ' GM:.Puplic Works & Development Services Concurrence: J. L. (m) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AB/dp I The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6861-2011 Appendix C - Preliminary Subdivision Layout -4- LOT A 10235 Municipal gravel pit ' MunicIpal gravel pit NWP 6502 PARK 47688 B BCP 46878 — LMP B BCP 46878 N \N ON 10150 X. \m V \ \ \ \ \ \ so 9 2 r CPn 265 126 ��2ss f� 2 ss Oa $ 5 s �o 3 BCP 23574 '0�s 4 � s s 5 0�2 6 4i 7 Q 010 8 9-400 Rem N 1/2 of NE 11 Section 3 TQll 12 Provincial gravel pit APPENDIX A ?4� 12 2q�$S 2 mow. 'l 4j4$ 0 10 a 9 27 24i 2$ 8 24720 102 AVE. 7 4 N BCP 1 7 EPP 9830 A / LSUBJECT PROPERTIES ! Ole I / A / BCP 46878 BCP 33649 PARK K �BPCAPR46878 PARK BCP 46878 CI f Pltt I Area ows_j i 10150 JACKSON ROAD & N/E PORTION —�I OF 10190 JACKSON ROAD L ,! i o fit# CORPORATION OF L _ 1= D THE DISTRICT OF N j. _- o District of I MAPLE RIDGE Langley I PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:2,500 u-_- DATE: Oct 31, 2011 FILE: 2011-082-RZ BY: PC �1s� APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.6861-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6861-2011." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot A Section 3 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP9830 Lot B Section 3 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan BCP46878 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1543 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District), and RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER s8 r 85 66 67 68 29 120 7 17 63 '� 12 taro7 16 103 AVE. �� 122 1o2gs � BCP 23575 Q= 123 44 45 9 rr & 127 BCP 43808 BCP' '� `447 1 N 2 3 � `�° 4 U�1 14 15 128 y V� ��P 19 LOT s a40eo BCP 23574 12 n z°4 d 1M5 M.-Pl g—d Pit l 6 'T '� 25 BCP 23575 4 9 °j`� �r14 BCP 7967 a g 27 26 PARK A Rem N 112 of NE 1/4 8 Section 3 Township 12 247N 102 AAVE. e Wndw g—q, a�2 iF NWP 6502 7 K P 38409 \ 6 5 4 102 AVE PARK 47fi88 B SCP 46878 IMP 5656 B o,se BCP 46878 hn, rni 2 RPP M O A 2 PARK m 0,50 � BCP 41516 m � m a PARK l \ \ \ 1 �� \ BCP 46878 ABCP 41516� 10125 \ \ \p423�0 BCP 33649 1 q BCP 46878 LMV PARK PARK BCP 46878 _ J F Np Z 9� PARK PARK BCP 41517 \ BCP 46878 / \ \ BCP 41516 ' LMP 42377 100 AVE. MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6861 —201 1 Map No. 1543 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), M-2 (General Industrial) To: R-1 (Residential District) ® RS-1 b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) MAPLE RIDGE N SCALE 1:3,500 0 APPENDIX C 0 . o o � oil e s� m•r o•� ti a � ® a3 � � o S' Zza N a vc 0 p o 4A : a 0 1 4 x v VAr d �. C NQ•'� ` � � 1T1•k' � k r g � r'' A7kd .4 O•p � c o•►Lc a t a. 1 k fy District of Maple Ridge Deep Pact$ Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 7, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-097-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6852-2011 20337 Dewdney Trunk Road and 12025 203 Street I0:IX601I1y/2&*111u1►VA I_1110 At the Council Meeting of August 30, 2011 Zone Amending Bylaw 6852-2011 was deferred by Council and direction was provided to investigate a higher density development at the subject sites. The proposal then was for 8 townhouse units to be zoned RM-1 (Townhouse Residential zone). The applicant has now revised the proposal. The revised proposal now is to rezone properties located at 20337 Dewdney Trunk Road and 12025 203 Street, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment), to permit a future construction of a four -storey building with 20 apartments, with an under -ground parkade. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6852-2011 be given First Reading; and; That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Wilson Chang, MAIBC Owner: Conecon Holdings Inc. Legal Description: Lot: M, D.L.: 263, Plan: 18612; PID: 003-888-053 Lot: L, D.L.: 263, Plan: 18612; PID: 004-630-017 OCP: Zoning: Existing: Major Corridor Residential (Urban Residential) Existing: RS-1(One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment) 1104 Surrounding Uses: North South East: West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Major Corridor Residential (Urban Residential) Use: Commercial and Dewdney Trunk Road Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial) Designation: Commercial Use: Church and 203rd Street Zone: P-4 (Church Institutional) Designation: Institutional Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban Residential -Medium Density) Designation: Major Corridor Residential (Urban Residential) Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Project Description: Vacant and Single Family Residential Multi -Family Residential (townhouses) 1849.99 m2 (0.45 acre) 203rd Street Full Urban The subject site consisting of two fairly flat lots, located on the north-west corner of Dewdney Trunk Road and 203rd Street. The corner lot had an older house that has been demolished. This empty lot is overgrown with native shrubs and blackberries. Currently there is an older single family house on the western property which will need to be demolished before final approval. Consolidation of the properties will be required as a condition of Final Reading. The applicant through this revised proposal intends to rezone properties located at 20337 Dewdney Trunk Road and 12025 203rd Street, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment), to permit a future construction of a four -storey building with 20 apartments, with under -ground parkade. The main vehicular access from 203rd Street is proposed via a lane leading to the at -grade visitor parking stalls and to the ramp leading to the under -ground parkade. A total of 30 residential parking spaces as required (including 10% small car parking) and 20 long term bicycle storage space are proposed in the under -ground parkade. The main pedestrian access to the apartment building is via an entrance lobby facing Dewdney Trunk Road (Appendix C). At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. IAA c) Planning Analysis: Official Communitv Plan: The subject sites are designated "Major Corridor Residential' within the Urban Residential Designation of the Official Community Plan. Dewdney Trunk Road and 203 Street are both identified as major corridors in Figure 4 of the Official Community Plan. The objective of this designation is to manage residential growth through infill and intensification in a manner that respects neighbourhoods and the existing physical character of the surrounding areas. The Major Corridor Residential designation is characterized by the following: a) is not within the Town Centre Area or a neighbourhood with an Area Plan; b) has frontage on an existing Major Road Corridor as identified on figure 4 of the Official Community Plan or has frontage on a road built in whole or part to a collector, arterial, TransLink Major road or Provincial Highway standard; c) may be adjacent to Community Commercial Node or designated Commercial Centre. This proposal complies with a) and b) above as it lies outside the Town Centre Area and outside a neighbourhood with an Area Plan and has frontage on 203 Street which is identified as a Major Road Corridor on figure 4 of the Official Community Plan. The Major Corridor Residential designation supports a variety of ground oriented housing forms such as single detached dwellings, garden suites, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhouses, apartments or small lot intensive residential, subject to compliance with the Major Corridor Infill policies. Noise from traffic along 203 Street and Dewdney Trunk Road could be a concern that needs to be dealt with through the building's design details. The area north of the subject site is in transition and it is anticipated that the single family houses to the north will re -develop to multi -family development in the future. This application is hence dedicating a lane that is anticipated to emerge and serve all the northern properties. -The lane system will, once completed, will allow for traffic movement to and from these lands in a comprehensive, organized and safe manner. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 zone (Medium Density Apartment), to permit a future construction of a four -storey building with 20 apartments, with under -ground parkade. The proposed RM-2 zone (Medium Density Apartment) is intended for low low-rise apartment type of housing form that is intended to be a 3 to 5 storey with central access to all the units and underground parking. A maximum density of 1.8 times the net lot area is permitted. This zone requires a minimum Usable Open Space of 20% of the net lot area and a Common Activity Area of 1 m2 per unit. The RM-2 zone (Medium Density Apartment), specifies a 7.5 metre setback from all property boundaries. Maximum permitted height in this zone must not exceed 4 storeys and 15.0 metres. Any variations from the height and setback requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Some setback variances facing 203 Street on the east, Dewdney Trunk Road on the south, the lane on the north and the width of the lane, have been requested for this proposal. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading and will be the subject of a future Council report. -3- Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan, a Multi -Family Development Permit application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses. Advisory Design Panel: A Multi -Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to Second Reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is not required for this application in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. d) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Building Department; e) School District; f) Utility companies; and g) Ministry of Environment The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading. e) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B or Schedule C); 2. Multi -Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D); 3. Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. M CONCLUSION: The development proposal is on an important major corridor node and is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. !, a Prepared by: Rasika Ach a, &Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED® AP, MCIP Planner II RAI Approved by: Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA V1 Acting Directpr-of Planning Approved by,' Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works.& Deve Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule {;I Chief Administrative Officer RA/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6852-2011 Appendix C - Preliminary site Plan & Under -ground Parkade Plan Appendix D - Preliminary Building Elevations Appendix E - Proposed Renderings -5- 121AVE. APPENDIX A 12142 0 12140 v 48 0 o v m 12099 47 0 46 0 45 0 o 44 P 41572 j N P 72496 72496 51 49 45 12095 9 LMP 9825 RF, � 1 2 50 12096 12122 - P 72496 12091 12125 P 41572 I G 44 I N 12119 12110 12111 20 d 12087 37 Fi 19 2A N SCALE 1:2.000 P 75684 1 f' Rem 1 SUBJECT PROPERTIES P12065 S i' K P 7 062 I - C JA L E Mc`� O N 38 12083 12079 18 P 83237 17 120?5 12g1 16 1 t2�7� 15 m 14 N DEWDNEY TRUNK ^1 f Pitt Mea ows I I 20337 DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD & -- �` ROLL #21139-0206-0 r' Tr. to * CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF District of MAPLE RIDGE -�'� � � �_T �_ _ j � Langley- ~`• PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Jul 29, 2011 FILE: 2011-097-RZ BY: PC FFTd Cto r�1 APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6852-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: J.. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6852-2011." 2. That/Those parcel (s) or tract (s) of land and premises known and described as: Lot "M" Except Firstly: Part Road on Plan 71641; Secondly: Part Road on Plan 80491; District Lot 263 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 18612 Lot "L" District Lot 263 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 18612 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1538 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 2011. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER N N 12099 w N P 72496 72496 51 49 12095 z LMP 9825 � 1 2 50 12096 P 72496 12091 12125 G N 12119 co ao 12111 a — — — — — — — — — — — — H — — RW 18394 P 75684 RW 19482 Rem 1 12105 12065 N K ao P 7 062 � C BSA Rem M rn a o rn LU L L m 12025 N O DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD 1 � N � N m N 1 P 775 RW 21843 4 3 _ BCP 30389 2 � P 41572 I 45 I RP I P 41572 I I 44 I LM 1 79 T— — 20 1 1 087 37 - -- — — — — — — — — 19 — f L - � 1 063 y Y° I207i9 38 18— 83237 17P 5 2p1 16 1 12p6"l I I 15 C, ! � e m w N I 14 DEWDNEY TRUNK RO — a LMP 4008 11100 B c) 1! MP,1QQ7 1 g I I N �, I 1 LIM' 3I4UU/ P 61704 71985 M I BC72b878 (lease) LMP 38261 (lease) LMP 40540 ([ease) I I LMP �8�98 (lease) Ln 74 1 `r° 1 ri LMP 33673 119 AVE. v I a 7ry$� I \I m 2 I I II 7ysss OS 7 co MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMEND NG Bylaw No. 6852-2011 Map No. 1538 From: RS— 1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) N SCALE 1:2,000 Y slp �I Y 1 c 9�s$s;5 lflPN 1S 42lcoe ld 1S3M �I� I � 1 s I I s 1 I yg I wooa a�veav� I. -------- mI I F s I u Ix I li I 1 I. I II I a I I w I I Z I I F 1 I 1 0 I 0 I I Z I I � �a I li 1 J I li Z:1 6 � . UII I I k;I 1 s vew 1 a T.I � z� L --------------------------- Lu-su) wss'se Id 1S3A4 0 APPENDIX C j V � N Z y Q I Sa �f:e LU � L[3 o a o E y S°FPPe IMP o, g z Z LU w a x� 20 Q %Rza a i 1 Q #— r"-----j----------------------------- Z o U' a oz o!iY j A Y 9 9P I I e s { 1 I I I I E I I e wv nvm I E I E I I I I E a Wo Tma I _ R Y1Y'JTYiri9 � � J � I f I I F•.. -.'T- 1 I - o-« I I � 0313tlS10 1 Q I I 1 1 Z f o°w 1 R 4 I Q I ✓� L I Q i °z I Ul 1 w § I W I d 1 Z Iz 51 1 , I I ------------------------------------- __�� .. 41¢ i 9 a Z APPENDIX D �a9 2s W lL' LLI �o M Q C 8�=3a�e ASS°jj& s d W Q Q ry W 3 b 6 ` �� W t ! y 5 2 6 & I a•el] •,u1 rr I } I ---1d1S3M {----r---] --- Fl I �I LL— I �l m I 1 I d l . I.e+nµ ca-nil =e�oe +I werae webs wane I wise Id H12�ON �JNlISIX3 Z O o --+------�-g o �---- Id HIUON M3N - I I Id Hinos M3N — ld Hip' OS JNlISIX3 f Z OZO 0 o �q x e;E r 1 �Ng¢ z 2 z a. A L Se% w a >8 t@e9's° 0 CO MI 0' W edit � + Q sa.r[ a W �c �! a ono it HIM!! s m P Id Hlf1aSTNI1SIX3 ,diHlnos,ML3N 11--- '-- f F •:J J j,.. I Id Hl2]ONM3N—'--'Z—' O 1 I + Q U IW, ,d HI'dON SNUSIX3 a I I 1 1 I ld ls3mi I_— J W LU O Y m CJ Q �e $S `s'aaa°3 HJ it Lu9,' iL's€ Qi p ao�� $e � 4 APPENDIX E Q O j U < / | % w Zk , |[ -»] [ w0a �g \� , �>z- B § ƒLu : � k Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 7, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-098-RZ Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6870-2011 12052, 12038 & 12032 — 223rd Street; 12043, 12027, 12021, 12026, 12034, 12042 & 12052 Garden Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One -Family Urban Residential) to C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) on this prominent corner in the Town Centre's Central Business District. This project is potentially one of the most significant developments in the Town Centre in the past decade. Although this project is in the preliminary stages, information provided to date for this proposal is consistent with the Town Centre Area Plan. A development, such as this one, may potentially generate future mixed -use development in the surrounding area. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6870-2011 be given First Reading and; That the following conditions be met prior to final reading: 1. A geotechnical report that addresses three levels of underground parking and how the site can accommodate the tower structures; 2. Registration of subdivision plan for the consolidation of all lots associated with this development project; 3. Registration of a Phased Development Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant that includes, but is not limited to, design guidelines, a phasing plan that identifies the project's proposed Floor Area Ratio, amenities, total square metres, number of buildings, building heights, and permitted uses; 4. A Development Permit Application for the 1st phase of development; 5. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; 6. Dedication of road at the corner of 224th Street and Dewdney Trunk Road to improve the alignment of 224th Street; 1105 7. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation. That the applicant provide further information as' described on Schedules C through E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: PETER J. MALLEN Owner: BRIAN JAMES HOLDINGS INC.; SALUS ENTERPRISES LTD., and 487559 B.C. LTD. Legal Description: Lot 2 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 Lot 3 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 Lot 4 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 Lot 5 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 Lot 18 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14549 Lot 24 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 15679 Lot 26 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 17845 Lot 2 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 13752 Lot 3 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 13752 Lot 4 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 13752 OCP: Existing: Town Centre Commercial Zoning: Existing: RS-1(One-Family Urban Residential) Proposed: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Commercial and Residential Zone: C-3 and RS-1 Designation Town Centre Commercial, Ground -Oriented Residential, and Low -Rise Apartment South: Use: Commercial Zone: C-3 Designation: Town Centre Commercial East: Use: Commercial Zone: C-3 Designation: Town Centre Commercial West: Use: Commercial Zone: C-3 and Land -Use Contract Designation: Town Centre Commercial WA Existing Use of Property: Single -Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Town Centre Commercial Site Area: 5640 m2 (1.393 acres) Access: Dewdney Trunk Road, Brown Avenue, 224th and 223th Streets Servicing requirement: Urban b) Project Description: The subject sites are proposed for rezoning from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) and form part of a parcel assembly that includes another six properties within these two blocks (see Appendix B). The other six properties already have C-3 zoning and therefore, are not part of the Zoning Bylaw amendment, but will be part of the Development Permit process. The development project is currently in the preliminary design stage and considerable more detail needs to be provided and worked through. It is anticipated that the mixed -uses on the site will consist of retail, restaurants, educational/institutional, office, multi -family residential, seniors housing, and a hotel (see Appendix D). At this early stage, the proposal is proposing a total of five podium -style towers that will range in height from 15 to 20 storeys on a site with a total area of 17,046 m2 ( 183,481 sq. ft.). Approximately 2,207 m2 (23,756 sq. ft.) of outdoor public amenity space is shown on the attached plans (Appendix D) towards the eastern edge of the site. The proposed floor area ratio is 5.02, which is expected to result in a total of over 21,000 m2 (226,042 sq. ft.) of commercial space and 64,377 m2 (692,948 sq. ft.) of residential and hotel accommodation. Most of the parking for the development will be provided in three levels of underground parking, which will also accommodate the loading facilities for the commercial portion of the site. Less than 40 public parking stalls will be accommodated at grade. Vehicle access to the site for most visitors/residents will be located off of Brown Avenue and Dewdney Trunk Road. Commercial loading access to the underground parking will be located off of 223rd Street and access to the hotel's underground parking will be off of 224th Street. The applicant will be required to consolidate the 16 lots, prior to Final Reading, and may choose to subsequently apply for a subdivision if the intent is to subdivide the consolidated site into individual parcels for each proposed building. Imorovin,i� 224th Street Road Alignment: The issue of improving the road alignment at 224th Street and Dewdney Trunk Road was discussed with the applicant at the outset and they have acknowledged their agreement with this. The applicant has completed a traffic analysis, which proposed improving the road alignment. This new alignment will require the applicant to dedicate approximately 650 m2 (6,997 sq. ft.) of their land off of the corner of 224th Street and Dewdney Trunk Road. Additionally, the applicant has expressed interest in obtaining the portion of Garden Street that lies within the boundaries of the development proposal into private ownership, which is approximately 1,644 m2 (17,696 sq. ft.). The details of these land issues are under discussion with the applicant. -3- Application Review: At this time the current application has been assessed in terms of land -use and its compliance with the Official Community Plan. At this stage in the development planning, the applicant would like feedback from Council before proceeding with more detailed plans. A detailed review and comments will be made once full application packages have been received and this analysis will be included in the Second Reading report. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The proposed development complies with the Town Centre Area Plan, as the area is designated for Town Centre Commercial with 20+ storey mixed -use development. Policies 3-29 through 3-31 state that building heights can range from 3 storeys to over 20 storeys and also that mixed -use development is also encouraged in this location. See Appendix E for a description of all policies listed in this section. Policies 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3 are supportive of the uses and higher density of this site, as an increase in residential and commercial density are particularly encouraged in the Central Business District that provide a broad mix of uses including office, medical services, recreation, affordable housing, and food services, such as grocery stores and restaurants. The proposed underground parking is supported by Policy 3-15 and the small urban square internal to the site is aligned with Policy 3-14. Further analysis will be necessary under policies 3-10, 3-11, and 3-12 upon receiving more design information prior to second reading. These policies are as follows: Policy 3-10: There is one property located within this block of properties that is 568 m2 and not included in the application. This policy states that a residual abutting lot is not left isolated if it will be left in a condition which is unsuitable for redevelopment or unsuitable for the maintenance of the existing land use. Policy 3-11: Viewscape studies are necessary to ascertain the extent of view impact towards the Golden Ears peaks. Policy 3-12: Shadow studies will be required to determine the impacts of this high density development on the available daylight outside of the site, but also within the interior courtyard area. The privacy impact of residents living in buildings would also be looked at to determine what impact building proximity would have on residents living inside. Given the above policies, the applicant will need to provide a plan showing the potential for 22327 Dewdney Trunk Road and viewscape and shadow studies prior to 2nd Reading and referral to Public Hearing. Zoning Bylaw - Proposed Comprehensive Development (CD) Zone: The current application proposal is to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) to permit a mixed -use development on the entire site. The C-3 zone corresponds with the Zoning Matrix within the Town Centre Area Plan and permits all of the uses and elements anticipated for this site. However, the C-3 zone does not permit a density as high as 5.02 floor area ratio and the attached bylaw does not include a text amendment to permit this proposed density. This is because the precise density cannot be confirmed at this time and may M change as the project planning phase evolves. Additionally, the applicant has stated a preference for creating a CD (Comprehensive Development) zone for this site, due to the project's significant size, complexity, and phasing over time. Staff are currently working through the details of what to include in creating a CD zone specific to this project. Once a draft has been completed, First Reading of the attached C-3 zone amending bylaw will likely be repealed and replaced with a draft CD zone for First and Second Reading. Design Guidelines & Development Agreement: District staff are working with the District solicitor to determine the content that will be required for a Phased Development Agreement and Design Guidelines and it is intended that drafts of each of these documents will be part of the Second Reading report. Phased Development Agreement: A Phased Development Agreement (See Section 905.1 through 905.3 of the Local Government Act) may include, but not be limited to, the Design Guidelines (discussed below), the minimum and maximum permitted floor area ratio, expected timing of each building phase, amenity contributions, minimum and maximum building heights, and anticipated uses. The Phased Development Agreement bylaw will be prepared so that it can receive First and Second Reading when this application next comes before Council and then be forwarded to Public Hearing. Design Guidelines: Due to the size and complexity of the development proposal, which is to be phased over a number of years, an important element will be the preparation of design guidelines, in addition to obtaining a Development Permit for each development phase. Although the design guidelines must be consistent with the existing Town Centre Development Permit Area guidelines, they will also provide greater detail of the design features and establish continuity for the development as it builds out overtime. Such items may include, but not be limited to architectural style, building materials, colour schemes, signage, awnings, green building and energy efficient design, appropriate building setbacks, lighting in public areas, and landscaping requirements. At this juncture, it is anticipated that the design guidelines will be included in the Phased Development Agreement discussed above. Advisory Design Panel: A Town Centre Civic Core Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to Second Reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. The applicant will be asked to invite the Downtown Business Improvement Association (BIA), as it is anticipated this significant project will be of interest to them. �'111111111 d) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application after First Reading, comments and input will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Parks Department; e) School District; f) Utility companies; g) Ministry of Transportation. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading. Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C); 2. Town Centre Commercial Development Permit Application (Schedule D); 3. Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The corner of 224th Avenue and Dewdney Trunk Road is prominent in the Town Centre. Its location in the heart of the Central Business District is close to the Civic Centre, Memorial Park, and several well -established local businesses. This development proposal aims to significantly increase the number of residents living in the Town Centre and may potentially lead to demand for more commercial development and further stimulate residential growth. The rezoning of the subject sites from RS-1 to C-3 is intended to advance this project, yet many of the details remain unknown at this stage. Given the complicated nature of a project of this size, it is likely that a Comprehensive Development zone or text amendments to the C-3 zone will be required. Should this happen, Bylaw 6870-2011 will get repealed and be replaced with a new bylaw.- M As stated above, the preliminary plans of the development proposal comply with the Official Community Plan and it is recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. Prepared by. 611Lisa Zosiak Planner elz Approved by. Christine, MCP, MCIP )Icting,DKector of Planning T Approved by.. Frank Quinn, IVIBK P.En GM & l ) veiopment Services L Concurrence: 1. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Map Showing Entire Project Area Appendix C- Zone Amending Bylaw 6870-2011 Appendix D - Preliminary Plans Appendix E - Town Centre Area Plan Policies Significant to this Application -7- APPENDIX A 12117 12121 17 9 12107 12104 0- 1211 s cW 13 10 20 12097 � 18 8 — 0-12092 12093 a_ r� 12096 14 9 J v N T a7 z 0 c) 12101 rnNN co N 7 12083 CE 08 12082 u319 12 1512087 CL LMP 27701 12072 OWN AVE. Rem 7 12061 Subject Properties m8 0 094 A 0 55 LMP 39839 co Ln 2052 12052 12011 [L 12043 LM P 20094 4 18 0) 4 12051 2038 LO r 12042 m 12027 g 3 Lo 24 3 a P 49034 2002/12 t j 2034 50 2032 a 12021 Rem 2 ro 26 111 12026 2 52 O CV 't P 20094 � r Ln OD T coC\1 1 co d B LO 10 M N (� N [� r m / N *LMP2967 N N N w N N N N N N N N N Dewdney Trunk Road P 61856 EP 9471 59105 Rem N r co m CC) CD co N CO CO m M 130 11998 P 67 E 2 N N N CO r c\ c0 O N EL N CV (0 N N N a) M N A E P 1 0 N m12 11 � B N M8 �a. 6 M5 N � � cfl �N P 8978 N N N N* 7 N TO T 11990/92/9 P W coCq P 32 6 P3 06 a) a) co Q r CO °C °� w IZ N 1 N P 4 11 ss2/ss WS 3233 N McINTOSH 21 *LMP4261 P�206 11969 A 11968/70 14 13 N 15 r P 4076 n _, __, _ vit i tits r � Mea ows 223 St & Garden St ' )1 IN L o CORPORATION OF p J f { ! THE DISTRICT OF � too MAPLE RIDGE N _; District of Langley PLANNING DEPARTMENT T 1 j . SCALE 1:1,500 �� _ _�j �'•--- DATE: Nov 1, 2011 2011-098-RZ BY: PC FRASER R. 12107 17 9 12104 a CQ 12118 N 13 20 12097 co T 12093 18 N 8 0 12092 A 12096 14 9 -j - - APPENDIX B _ [Z 12101 0- co o 12083 12082 16 19 N 7 3 g w 12087 12084 15 0_ 27701 12072 Rem 7 SUBJECT PROPERTIES 12061F�FF 55 o "' o T■-F T N A LMP 39839 2052 5 12052 d 1 12043 - 794 1 4 18 0 4 12051 2038 r112203'4 02 �_ 12027 LO 9 3 � 24 3 CL P 49034 2002/12 j 50 2032 12021 Rem 2 ao 26 12026 2 52 LO a Lo CD ONO T 0000 C7 094 1 � � 27 r � LO 0-N O N It B 00 10 M N mN � I" r C° n �C00 N C0 N Cl) 0 Cn Cn CO 2967QV N N W r N N N ■ 12011 0 C7 (ILIVIP 2358 NOT INCLUDED IN THIS R OTHER AFFECTED POPERTIES 1 DEWDNEY TRUNK RD DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL P 61856 N T o CO 00 00 CO CO o co N C1p O v CO r- v M � �998 :130 P 67041 N N N C\ co r C� CD V O N N N CO (h C N N N N N N � N E P 11502 N 12 11 N B N co N o v N 6 5 N 0 W N 11990/92/9 103 N N It N N 7 N N O O co _0 Q r r M T N P 49778 co P 32 6 P3 06 w CL N P 4076 N 11982/86 "LMP4261 McINTOSH 14 0 11955165i P 206 A 11969 13 15 11968/70 P 4076 ¢ N 11968 � 16 17 C 20 CV B 11965/67 11950 IL ca 0 Lo in or3 cncnri 11952/54/58 ! ,- 223 STREET & GARDEN STREET Il i 0 * CORPORATION OF 12 = THE DISTRICT OF i S � MAPLE to RIDGE- MAPLE RIDGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT r DATE: Oct 17, 2011 FILE: 2011-098-RZ BY: DT APPENDIX C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. No 6870-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6870-2011." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 2 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 Lot 3 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 Lot 4 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 Lot 5 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 Lot 18 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14549 Lot 24 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 15679 Lot 26 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 17845 Lot 2 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 13752 Lot 3 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 13752 Lot 4 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 13752 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1547 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to C-3 (Town Centre Commercial). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 2011. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1 L 496 arse fi°� 12157 12148(ECRA) 12149 14 12 28 12142 P 15022 N 1 12150 N 2131 Rem LMP 39518(lease) G t�v15 11 ^ 23 12151 P 10689 'ry iz13o `O 1z135 29 NWS 1688 r12121 12130 R ) d 16 10 12128 E 12124 12 21 a 12127 P 61324 12117 12121 t0 12107 00 17 9 12104 0. N 133 LMP 27702 1218 N 13 Fd 20 1 12097 r 18 ry 13 0_ 12093 r 12092 0_ N a 2096 9 14 Z J N _ N W m 12101 mo 52) Q_ N a 72D92 3 A 19 7 8 12087 12asa�-12083 15 o LMP 34533 LMP 27701 12072 18 BROWN AVE. Rem 7 r 1 12061 I B w Rem 8 P 20094 t 55 5 12052 12011 tA P 20094 °' 4 LMP 2358 P 8411 N 2051nr 12042 3 9 2002'1212034a P 49034 RemP 20094 2 52 0 U) v (/ N LLi IL V Q ry W 07 1 A g P 20094 9 v �, o` �27'_ B _ m � 'LMp2967 . a WN � DEWDNEY TRUNK RD. RP 59105 P 61856 EP 9471 o N1/2 E r Rem m m m �ma 0 1130a Pfi7041 n E 1/2 m 2 �12 11 N N B a N m m A E EP 11502 8 a 6 5 0° o a 799 103 R T 68 c2 ¢ p 8978 N o_ 7 < a. T P 49779 1 70 tE w P 632 N P 32 P 06 w a i9svas P 4076 LMP NWS 3233 .,uurncu Pc1.121 `LMP4261 p 06 A 119ss 1189970 74 13 P 4076 11968 (015 16 17 C 20 N B 11965/67 � N N 11 ss3 nsso RP 52529 9521E 79 NWS 418 97 14 M N J m < a) Q PC]. ,p" BCP35451 raj N 11955 N v 1 N N McINTOSH AVE. 0. McINTOSHAVE 11957 a� 11s2a o o� a.� p A� � 0 1 ns3s MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6870-2011 Map No. 1547 From: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) To: C —3 (Town Centre Commercial) N SCALE 1:2,500 APPENDIX D Z¢ 4�fn�� wz F1 w a 0 0 Ir m� � a ow coN�>J�3 N N N N d N-O 3 O L O C J J J_C a0 H N U C J W m m mmm `m �a m. FL t n-o o 9 m m m m o o_To.� m Zt' 0a`tnaaa�orOujW 3 o�Nr�v nc0r,00M � eoo 0000000�� O Qoo�aaoanaaaaa ¢� o->Uo C7 Q vC7 > F �N HN �U� N � ScaiU mV >m ��>m 2 �>m U o 0mm NI in>a mom Q 1odW 8 59 Z m�N �� J �=cooi'9 rywaim �a aN $ md� zz -o U N L9 O ' [O W 10 �v 0 N er�m Z mo mco Z N_�v N I�� oa N 0 Qa �9+L">v Z �o oa 3 LCl)� U(O pZ C 0 t UCO G 7O �(➢�. Cf0 O Acu 8 aicn>N Su)>u SM:3 . aDcn>v z-j J 0 C a z 'I W/I . 4( o.|I i/ §§§ I )�§ MIN HIM | : ]�§� ) | r .. § so ( ( ( !\ (§§ ,j- ( EO || ,.�_ oo:d:ow::\( § \§\ |�la t,/» .( � § ± § ! | �,r2A®{ r | ! Q§Eli § i ! � « ( § § , .1,..,,,r !# § ) ; , ( .1 !!!AIN , ....M CL ))§)j\\) W W5jp$� g ¢9 =fit cui n W a co El N Q= � ejgk W Z a )) € ❑ � li ( � f'E j QQQpQ�Q�] I J Z- ;j € iLL, � o FS Fe O ❑o FT- 3 4 H , j RIO F- LLJ JZ a , - t _jw z L- --1 ZQEll! LU Ln ji€86R9 E. 9 C3 1 it a Z4� I � l z ICUC I s1 _Y111 LU L< Lu FF jr i r 21 04, Fr Zflil C3 I I 00000�oo z J 2+:\- �/ / �q\ [� Mi � c§; / � |� ■ ( � K I IMUIS PJea \ � 2 � ■ � w rj Ili sI m " w �€;€i�� ; gEYQ�� � w � 392ie ; lS�Q� z � i a• Ej O f� � i d C J z@ w �§ � K �@ § III I M iZ ƒ / 41, rn =b: § El � . \| o / /m.g k3ƒ10] � � � § z LUE LU Z cn n El _jw Iq i I � L'U' FT-F M 0 F-7777-7-7. L 'NW Q JCL a W0 W > yy¢¢ 9i _ �` � ➢II � N j I g4PA TO 4 4 APPENDIX E Appendix E: Town Centre Area Plan Policies Related to Development Application 2011-098-RZ Section 3.1 - General Land -Use Requirements 3-1 An increase in residential and commercial density is encouraged in the Town Centre, particularly within the Central Business District (see Figure 2 for boundaries of CBD). Land -use should include a mix of housing types catering to various demographics, including affordable and special needs housing, within walking distance of a broad mixture of uses, including shops, services, cultural facilities, and recreation. 3-2 Office use will be encouraged, particularly over ground level units in a mixed -use development, within and around the Central Business District and also in the commercial designated areas of Port Haney. 3-3 Commercial uses that support the residential population of the Town Centre through the provision of necessary goods, including food, and services such as medical care are a priority function and will be encouraged to develop or remain in and around the Central Business District of the Town Centre and in the commercial designated areas of Port Haney. 3-10 Land assembly or lot consolidation proposed in conjunction with development, redevelopment, conversion, or infilling should meet the following conditions: a. That any residual lots or remaining land parcels are left in a configuration and lot area which are suitable for a future development proposal, or can be consolidated with other abutting residual lots or land parcel and complies with the applicable Land -Use Designations and Policies of Section 3.3.1 of this Plan; b. The use of any residual abutting lots or land parcels can continue to function in accordance with the applicable Land Use Designation and Policies of 3.3.1 of this Plan; c. Residual abutting lots or land parcels are not isolated or left in a condition which is unsuitable for redevelopment or unsuitable for the maintenance of the existing land use; d. The land assembly proposal will incorporate adequate impact mitigation measures such as the provision of buffers, landscaping, site design, building arrangements and building design to ensure compatibility with abutting existing land uses. 3-11 Viewscape studies may be required for proposed buildings greater than three (3) storeys in height, where views may be impacted towards Golden Ears peaks to the north and the Fraser River to the south. Important viewscapes have been identified along 224th Street, within Port Haney, and the south slopes of the Town Centre on 116th and on 227th. In locations where it is deemed that key viewscapes will be impacted, an increase in density, or the proposed form, may not be supported. 3-12 High density development that is four or more storeys in height may be required to include a shadow study in consideration of adjacent sites to address potential impacts on available daylight. Consideration should also be given to the privacy of residents in existing buildings. 3-13 Creating public outdoor meeting spaces will be encouraged in appropriate locations within the Central Business District and may take the form of urban squares, plazas, courtyards, or passageways between buildings. These areas will be landscaped with trees and plants that will attract birds and insects and also provide seating areas for people to rest, reflect, or meet and visit with others. Incorporating public art into these spaces will be encouraged. 3-14 Concealed parking structures are encouraged in all commercial, mixed -use, multi- family uses, and institutional uses in the Town Centre. Below grade parking structures are particularly encouraged for Low -Rise, Medium, and High -Rise Apartment, Mixed -Use, Flexible Mixed-Use/Live-Work, Commercial, and Institutional buildings. Above grade concealed parking is a viable option where building height (six or more storeys) coupled with challenging site conditions make it cost prohibitive to provide all required parking spaces in an underground structure. Above grade parking structures should be designed in such a manner that the pedestrian realm, streetscape fapade, and protected views of the Town Centre are not impaired. Section 3.3 - Land -Use Designations - Town Centre Commercial 3-29 Building heights within the Town Centre Commercial will range from three (3) storeys in height to over twenty (20) storeys. Generally, building heights should not be permitted greater than twenty-five (25) storeys. 3-30 Multi -Family Residential use is permitted as a principle use in the Town Centre Commercial designation, except where identified on Schedule "G" as "Ground Floor Commercial Required" in the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw, where the ground floor use is to be commercial. 3-31 Within a Mixed -Use development, retail, service, and entertainment uses shall be encouraged at ground level with office and/or residential uses encouraged above - grade. Section 5.1 - Offering Transportation Choice 5-1 The enhancement of transportation circulation within the Maple Ridge Town Centre will be encouraged with extensions street right-of-ways, as shown on Schedule 1 and Figure 1 of the Town Centre Area Plan. District of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 7, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-114-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6868-2011 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6869-2011 22810 113 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). The proposed rezoning to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) requires an amendment to the property's Official Community Plan's Town Centre Area Plan designation from Low Rise Apartment to Ground Oriented Multi -Family. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and; That Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 6868-2011 be given First reading; That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6869-2011 be given First Reading; and; That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A-H of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Atelier Architecture Inc Brian Shigetomi 1106 Owner: NAG Construction Co Ltd Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation South: Use: Zone: Designation: East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Site Characteristics: Lot: 2, D.L.: 402, Plan: LMP39949 Low -Rise Apartment Ground -Oriented Multi -Family RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RM-1(Townhouse Residential) Park RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Park Haney Bypass, Canadian Pacific Railway and Park RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Park Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Low -Rise Apartment Townhouse RM-1(Townhouse Residential) Ground -Oriented Multi -Family Vacant Townhouse 0.925 HA. (2.28 acres) 113 Avenue Urban Standard The subject property is currently vacant and cleared with single family properties to the east, townhouses to the west, parkland to the north and Haney Bypass to the south. The property slopes from north to south towards the Haney Bypass and will likely require retention along the southern boundary. The proposed development will be accessed off 113 Avenue and the Ministry of Transportation will be required to sign any zone amending bylaw involving the subject site due to its proximity to the Haney Bypass. 113 Avenue is currently dedicated but not built; the current proposal will upgrade this access to a full urban standard. Project Description: The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1(Townhouse Residential) to permit development of 44 townhouse units. At this time, the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. WA c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The property is currently designated Low -Rise Apartment in the Town Centre Area Plan, however, the applicant proposes an Official Community Plan amendment to Ground Oriented Multi -Family to permit a townhouse development. Prior to the 2008 Town Centre Area Plan, townhomes were encouraged for this site due to its low density neighbourhood context. The OCP amendment is supportable as property immediately to the west of this site houses an existing townhouse development. The current proposal for townhouses is in conformity with existing development in the area. This proposal, rather than a low-rise apartment, will provide a more suited infill development. Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 22810 113 Avenue from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit development of a 44 unit townhouse complex. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.11 of the Official Community Plan, a Town Centre Development Permit application is required for all multi -family residential, flexible mixed use and commercial development located in the Town Centre. Advisory Design Panel: Town Centre Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to Second Reading. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. d) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Parks Department; e) School District; and f) Ministry of Transportation. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. -3- This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading. e) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 - 1999 as amended: 1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B or Schedule C); and 3. Multi -Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D); The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is not in compliance with the 2008 Town Centre Area Plan within the Official Community Plan, however, justification has been provided to support an Official Community Plan amendment. It is, therefore, recommended that Council grant First Reading to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaws No. 6868-2011 and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6869-2011 subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. It is, therefore recommended that Council not require any additional consultation. The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge's Approving Officer. Prepared by: Sarah Atkinson Planning Technician o-r. `- Approved by. Charles R. Goddard, BA, MA Prn�virect9"nning Approved by: Fr k Quinn, M , P.Eng :1 Pu Iic rks & Development Services Concurrence: J. L (.(im) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appeordices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6868-2011 Appendix C - Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6869-2011 Appendix D - Site Plan !Z! LMP 13592 C �i s LMS 37� r'v sS LMP 9560 LMS 1258 "A" N 113 AVE LMP 39046 0 LOT 2 N LMP 39949 ygti FY6 Yp ASS :NDIX A a r 2 11422 LMP 2582 PARK BCP 33406 11384 10 P 14624 372 9 P 14624 2 8 P 14624 11332 10 _1 7 Subject Proper14624 Property 11318 11 Co k Rem A o 11313 z EP 14217 N� 7 11298 c+� 11299 CoQ B Rem 14 ¢V N 1 17 P 19750 15 CoM 11285 94 rn A d �RqS, 163 d 72y � >> A 8 �$ Rem. 2av o`� 7q 1 13 r`L n 73 77�y& B my 2 72 2 rr A 79?S 77 a- 13 �o 26� 12 ¢- 9 CV ns' APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6868-2011. A Bylaw to amend Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 6425 - 2006 as amended WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Section 10.4, Schedule 1 Town Centre Area Land - Use Designations; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6868-2011." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot: 2, D.L.: 402, Plan: LMP39949 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 815, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby redesignated to Ground -Oriented Multi -Family. 3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 20 . READ A SECOND TIME the day of A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of A.D. 20 . READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER LIP 258 LMS 37 �' A \6CP 38092 PARK J \ BCP 3406 LMP 9560 \ \ LMS 1258 \ \ \ RCP 33407 I _ \ 1 "A� LOTS \ \ 94 10 / \ P 14624 11372 LMP 10788 \ 91352 P 14624 � — _ — 11375 LMP 9562 \ \ 8 \\ P 14624 11$AVE. 11332 LMP 39046 \ p� \ \ w \ \ LOT 2 10 7 \ \ 1 P 14624 \ - cgNgOrq� N LMP 39949Rem A a 1327 318 \ \ F/C 94/, tv 11313 $g EP 14217 oN�\ 7 a \ \ qy n2ss z nzsa �?� \ \ \ B Rem 14 c$ �� 3 _ N \ \ \ ggss m �} P 19750 N 15 11285 ` \ c�0 A N 4 \ \ 9018 LZ r, A rg +$ \ Rem. c r4 �\ \ \ 13 h r3\ B \ \ Q rr \ r91� �c ro 2955 \ \ AZ ryP 7 \ ) lb n, \ s \ a \t RP 3736 \ \ $ \\ \ MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6868-2011 Map No. 815 From: Appartment — Low Rise To: Ground —Oriented Multi —Family N SCALE 1:2,500 APPENDIX C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.6869-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6869-2011." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 2 District Lot 402 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan LMP39949 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1546 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RM-1(Townhouse Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER /. } vo 11422 LMP 25Mr 1 s� A / LMS 37 \ • '°ems 1\� P PARK �°� / 36092 J '� � \ \ �� BCP 06 \ LMP 9560 i 1 LMS 1258 \ ,A„ LOT S , \ BCP 33407 1138410 N , \ 11372 P 14624 LMP 10788 9 P 14624 17375 LMP 9562 ` 8 q \ P 14624 �Z LMP 39046 11932 o ,kw \ LOT 2 go10 7 , \ 01Nq LMP 39949 `- 11327 P 14624 , `- 11318 � '04Q O 11 mro Rem A 9y 1313 z EP 14217i�7 11299 p�� 11298 B Rem 14 3 m ryn rp N P 7 P 19750 a y p9 m Cm 11285 a A Rem. �L A 13 \ \ ry2jB B my Q 7R Y7 79>S0 970 12 RP 3736 B MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6869-2011 Map No. 1546 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) N SCALE 1:2,500 APPENDIX D g O a w // �►� LL Z Z —� NN I cUn I I I � F z W —� IL I O I �I W { > W G it ILI I I , W I O Il �r� ��a� ,,... _ tl I'�, '��„�n lni P►i ['It Yt�� nt !nt `� • ' 1nt Int li ��•'L• G XJT4 - C C1RrV9—,.— �- W Ile 19 _ 4 � ' 'L,.-'•• � will' ~y �/ / / Cl) G _ Idi h INus — w� iwl x . , District Of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 7, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-037-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6817-2011 24311 and 24361 124 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6817-2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading: i. Road dedication as required; ii. Removal of existing deck on proposed Lot 1. iii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations. iv. Pursuant to the Contaminated Site Regulations of the Environmental Management Act, the subdivider will provide a Site Profile for the subject lands. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Pasquale De Luca Owner: Pasquale and Celeste De Luca Legal Description: Lots 49 and 50, Section: 22, Township: 12, NWD Plan: 43885 OCP: Existing: Estate Suburban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) 1107 Surrounding Uses: North: South: East: West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Estate Suburban Residential Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Agricultural Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Estate Suburban Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 1.62 ha (4 acres) 124 Avenue Rural b) Project Description: The applicant proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), in support of a future subdivision into four lots no smaller than 0.4 hectares, each. The existing homes are proposed to be maintained; although the deck of one of the homes will need to be removed to meet zoning requirements. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The proposed rezoning to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) is in accordance with the subject properties' designation as Estate Suburban Residential in the Official Community Plan (OCP). Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 24311 and 24361 124 Avenue from RS-3 (One Family Rural .Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit the future subdivision into four one acre lots. The applicant has requested a relaxation to the side yard setback for proposed Lot 1. The proposed variance will be the subject of a future report to Council. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed project and has noted that there are no services required in support of this rezoning application. As a result, no rezoning servicing -2- agreement is required. The Engineering Department has further determined that road dedication is required along the subject site frontage. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks Department has reviewed the application and has noted that a road shoulder equestrian trail exists on 124 Avenue that will need to be considered in the development servicing plans for this application. e) Environmental Implications: The subject properties are located adjacent to land within the Agricultural Land Reserve, and the applicant has completed an Agricultural Impact Assessment and a Groundwater Impact Assessment in support of the proposed development. CONCLUSION: This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. Therefore, it is recommended that Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6817 - 2010 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. hwkv� - Prepared by: Amelia Bowden Planning Technician Approved by: Charle , oddard, BA, MA Ac ' g Dir r of Pla r Approved b : Frank Quinn, MBA, P. -n'g M: Public rks ev opment Services Concurrence: J L. (Jim) Rule 7 hief Administrative Officer AB/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6817-2011 Appendix C - Subdivision Plan -3- 12530 125 AVE. 125 AVE. 12490 12460 1244C 1242 124 Ave APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6817-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6817-2011." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 49, Section 22, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 43885 Lot 50, Section 22, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 43885 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1519 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the loth day of May, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER LMP 123 1 Rem 64 N � y 12525 125 AVE. N 56 LMP 744 LMP 745 1 2 N N 124 AVE. 55 48 W z P 70 8 a EPP 414 7 � o i O � 2 12530 � M N 125 AVE. N N P 4388 m � 76 K � N m v N 12497 w 1 P 43885 12490 54 53 IL 1 12475 12460 2 12447 12440 1 r J P 43885 w z P 438 e 78 E 50 n a 2 N a N 12420 21 P 3118 N 12384 N N 190' 12 a 20 12370 12375 LMP 34711 Rem 12 12355 r N a N 12342 I 11 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6817-2011 Map No. 1519 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) N SCALE 1:2,500 APPENDIX C c � i,L90L Vold a N N 95.42 0 N p L f_a 4&96 d p o LO L a Z O 95.45 N c v c Z � 0 o $ q el L M N CL- � o 46.06 .18 LO O L � n � rt 0 0 N It LO 95.44 00 ~ 00 LO LO QO o � h 5� C C � � m Z � N O G fw O N UZ2j N � y N fn y NQ 0 l cL h O 1� �J7 U O CLN o cn 3o6 iNz District Of Maple Ridge Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 7, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-077-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6848-2011 27540 128 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit future subdivision into two (2) lots. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6848-2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the release of Restrictive Covenant R68259 from the subject site be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 3. That the automatic removal of Restrictive Covenant R68259 from all lots within the Garibaldi Street subdivision encumbered with the same covenant be authorized, if and when a rezoning application is received; and 4. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading. An Engineer's report on the water quantity for domestic and fire protection purposes must be received; ii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations. iii. Pursuant to the Contaminated Site Regulations of the Environmental Management Act, the subdivider will provide a Site Profile for the subject land. 1108 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Douglas Pastorek Owner: Wendy Nixon and Douglas Pastorek Legal Description: Lot: 44, D.L.: 6881, Group 1 NWD Plan: 57415 OCP: Existing: Suburban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: 0.809 hectares (2.0 acres) Access: 128 Avenue Servicing requirement: Rural Standard -2- b) Project Description: The applicant proposes to rezone the property to permit for future subdivision into two single family lots while maintaining the existing home. A number of easements are registered on the Certificate of Title regarding a community water system that was required in 1979 to enable the original subdivision. Since this time, the water servicing has changed from a community water system to a municipal water distribution system connected by trunk water mains. As a result of this change, Restrictive Covenant R68259 is no longer required for the subject site and surrounding lots in the subdivision encumbered with the same covenant. Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject site is designated Suburban Residential in the Official Community Plan which permits a single detached housing form located outside of the Urban Area Boundary. The RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone is in compliance with this designation, and requires city water and sewage disposal provided by a private system. Zoning Bylaw: The applicant proposes to rezone the property located at 27540 128 Avenue from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to allow for future subdivision into two (2) lots. c) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed project and has noted that there are no services required in support of this rezoning application. As a result, no rezoning servicing agreement is required. The Engineering Department has requested that the applicant confirm that adequate on -site septic systems can be built; and that the available water flow and pressure is adequate for domestic use and for fire sprinkler systems. Additionally, the Engineering Department has reviewed the easements relating to the community water system and is in support of their discharge. d) Environmental Implications: Environmental staff have reviewed the application and have determined that a development permit is not required. An arborist report will be completed as a requirement of the subdivision application. -3- CONCLUSION: This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. Therefore, it is recommended that Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6848-2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. - 1aat--_ Prepared by: Amelia Bowden Planning Technician Approved by. Cha)rr)y Goddard, BA ,MA Acting Director of Planning Approved by. I k Quinn, MBA, P.E Public Works & evel❑ ment Services r Concurrence: J. L. (jim) Rule i- Chief Administrative Officer r i AB/ The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6848-2011 Appendix C - Site Plan ELAM �3 �T P 57415 P 57415 APPENDIX A 24 25 26 27 co o U') U) N N N N 128 AVE, o L N N 12750 P 57415 44 Subject Property 45 29 12688 P 57415 P 57415 46 l 30 43 12670 I 12685 47 31 P 57415 `) v 42 12638 P 57415 CI f Pitt Mea ows_ j r cm 27540-128th Ave 1110 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE District of - Langley I PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:1,500 ks�R DATE: Jun 29, 2011 2011-077-RZ BY: JV APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6848-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6848-2011." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 44 District Lot 6881 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 57415 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1535 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 30th day of August, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER ,A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER — — — — R W 57416 — — — — — — RW 57416 P 34392 / / N I LM D7078 12776+j / / 23 P 79563 m/ / P 57415 / P 57415 � P 57415 60 61 tent / 24 25 / 26 27 28 22 / o 126 AVE. N O n 12750 12707 21 P 57415 44 45 F 79583 29 71 70 12688 P 57415 12675 46 P 57415 30 43 14M ¢� � 12674 lzsas 47 2� 12625 31 P 57415 0 42 m zs36 P 57415 48 12650 12643 P57415 Y 12620 AO MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6848-2011 Map No. 1535 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) 85 P 72838 86 2a Z8'7 N SCALE 1:2,500 Z n x n �9B ® v t ~O v: 'sr n r Ix mot• �• sr�8 Q r � m !�� -Z ti H u �— 2 `b ` x 37.3— L-C) n i i g a ®a = rn 1� 6g9 ci 3 LL O Z N r� 0ao CIO 0 c c 0 J N v Z,:i E o = � s En m �V yai 0 3cd ILA APPENDIX C Deep Roots District of Maple Ridge Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: SUBJECT: Final One Year Extension Application 10578 245B Street and 10601 Jackson Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: November 7, 2011 RZ/104/06 CofW Council granted a one year extension to the above noted application on November 23, 2010. The applicant has now applied for a final one year extension under Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. This application is to permit the subdivision of approximately 23 single family lots under the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone. RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, a second and final one year extension be granted for rezoning application RZ/104/06 (property located at 10578 245B Street and 10601 Jackson Road) and that the following conditions be addressed prior to consideration of final reading: i. Amendment to Schedules "B" & "C" of the Official Community Plan; ii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iii. A Statutory Right -of -Way plan and agreement must be registered at the Land Title Office (for storm drainage and municipal access to the Park); iv. Road and Park dedication as required; V. Pursuant to the Contaminated Site Regulations of the Environmental Management Act, the subdivider will provide a Site Profile for the subject lands. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Damax Consultants Ltd. David Laird; Owner: Allard Contractors Ltd; Montcalm Aggregates Ltd, Inc No 92144 1109 - 1 - Legal Description: Lot: 5, Section: 10, Township: 12, Plan: 75957 Lot: 6, Section: 10, Township: 12, Plan: 75957 OCP: Existing: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation Proposed: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation Zoning: Existing: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Surrounding Uses North: South: East: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation: Use: Zone: Designation Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Accesses: Servicing: Companion Applications: Single Family Residential RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation Vacant, former Sand and Gravel operation RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation Vacant, previously water ponds, sediment ponds and storage of fines from gravel operation on east side of Jackson Road. Single Family Residential 0.859 HA (2.12 Acres) 106 Avenue and 245B Street Full Urban to be provided SD/104/06, WPDP/104/06 This application is to permit a subdivision of approximately 23 single family lots. The following dates outline Council's consideration of the application and Bylaw(s) 6698-2009 and 6697-2009: The First Reading report (see attached) was considered on October 27, 2009; - First Reading was granted October 27, 2009; - Public Hearing was held November 17, 2009; Second and Third reading was granted on November 24, 2009; - First extension was granted November 23, 2010. WA Application Progress: The applicant has completed most of the terms and conditions to be met prior to Final Reading of the Zone Amending Bylaw. The applicant, Damax Consultants Ltd., expects to be in a position to complete requirements and to request final subdivision approval by March 2012. Alternatives: Council may choose one of the following alternatives: 1. grant the request for extension; 2. deny the request for extension; or 3. repeal third reading of the bylaw and refer the bylaw to Public Hearing. CONCLUSION: The applicant has been actively pursuing the completion of this rezoning application and has applied for a final one year extension. It is anticipated that within the next few months final consideration will be applied for. Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP Planning Technician Approved by arles R. Goddard, BA, MA 6ating Dhrector of P Appro7d by. Frank Quinn Gill: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer 3 The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - First Reading Report -3- APPENDIX A Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: and Members of Council FILE NO: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: October 13, 2009 RZ/104/06 CofW First Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6697 - 2009 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6698 - 2009 10578 245B STREET and 10601 JACKSON ROAD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential to permit the subdivision of approximately 18 single family lots. In the northwest corner of the site 1770m2 (0.44ac) will be dedicated as Park for the environmental protection of Maggy Creek. The proposed development is consistent with the policies for residential development in the Albion Area Plan of the Official Community Plan. The application requires an amendment to the Official Community Plan to adjust the boundaries of the Conservation land use area. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6697 - 2009 be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 2. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and on- going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6697 - 2009 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a public hearing on the bylaw; 3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6697 - 2009 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6697 - 2009 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 5. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6698 - 2009, be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. Amendment to Schedules "B" & "C" of the Official Community Plan; ii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iii. A Statutory right of way plan and agreement must be registered at the Land Title Office (for storm drainage and municipal access to the Park); iv. Road and Park dedication as required; V. Pursuant to the Contaminated Site Regulations of the Environmental Management Act, the subdivider will provide a Site Profile for the subject lands. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: SACRE-DAVEY ENGINEERING Owner: ALLARD CONTRACTORS LTD and MONTCALM AGGREGATES LTD, INC NO. 92144 Legal Description: Lots 5 and 6, Section 10, Township 12, NWD Plan75957 OCP: Existing: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation Proposed: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation Zoning: Existing: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Surrounding Uses North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation South: Use: Vacant, former Sand and Gravel operation Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation -2- East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Accesses: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) Medium Density Residential Single Family Residential RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation Vacant, previously water ponds, sediment ponds and storage of fines from gravel operation on east side of Jackson Road. Single Family Residential 0.859 HA 106 Avenue and 245B Street Full Urban SD/104/06, WPDP/104/06 An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit the subdivision of approximate ly`,8-single family residential lots. At subdivision a new road will be constructed on the site to connect 106 Avenue to 245B Street and the lane to the west of Jackson Avenue will be completed to 106 Avenue. Also, a walkway to connect 106 Avenue to Jackson Road will be provided at subdivision. A park will be dedicated in the northwest corner of the site for the environmental protection of Maggy Creek. There is future subdivision potential to consolidate 3 remnant parcels from the development to the north (by Epic Homes) with remnant portions on this site for an estimated additonal 6 lots. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The subject site is designated Low/Medium Density Residential and Conservation in the Albion Area Plan of the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan. The proposed RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zoning for the site aligns with the Albion Zoning Matrix (Section 10.2.7) of the Official Community Plan for Low/Medium Density Residential use. An amendment to the boundary of the Conservation area shown on Schedules B and C is required to provide a larger area than originally estimated for the protection of a pond and wetland area surrounding the headwaters of a tributary of Maggy Creek in the northwest corner of this development site. -3- Zoning Bylaw: The proposed subdivision of the property meets the minimum lot width, lot depth and lot area requirements of the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone. Develo ment Permits: A Watercourse Protection Development Permit is required for this development for the protection of a wetland surrounding the headwaters of a tributary of Maggy Creek in the northwest corner of this development site. Development Information Meetin : A Development Information Meeting was not required for this development because there are fewer than 25 lots proposed. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: The Engineering department reviewed the servicing for the development and determined that there are no Rezoning Servicing requirements for this development. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional 18 trees which is based on one tree per lot; final subdivision design will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $450.00. e) Environmental Implications: A Watercourse Protection Development Permit is required for this development for the protection of the headwaters of a tributary of Maggy Creek in the northwest corner of this development site. An Environmental Assessment determined that a pond previously located in that area has been disturbed and requires rehabilitation and enhancement to provide a bio-filtration pond and wetland area within the area to be designated Conservation. The developer will also be providing off -site environmental compensation works to improve the planting around the detention pond in the Park north of 106 Avenue, northeast of this site. f) Intergovernmental Issues: Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, (insert amendment), is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing -4- procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment: has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. CONCLUSION: The proposed RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone conforms to the land use designation in the Albion Area Plan of the Official Community Plan. It is therefore recommended that application RZ/104/06 be favourably considered and that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6697 - 2009 (Appendix B) and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6698 - 2009 (Appendix C) be read a first time and be forwarded to Public Hearing. Prepared by: Ann Edwards, CPT Planning Technician Approved by. Jane P" ering, MCP, MCIP Direc�pr of Planning Approved bFrank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng l GM: Public s & De op nt Services Concurrence: J. (Jim) Rule J. Administrative Officer AE/ The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - OCP Amending Bylaw No. 6697 - 2009 Appendix C - Zone Amending Bylaw No.6698 - 2009 Appendix D - Site Plan &7Z 28 75 APPENDIX A 27 t 26 LL ILL o N r 10606 u 10683 1 1°d16 4 94 O 90 ry 91 N 6 6 PVC' 25% T 117 120 10679 10 �0 N N 36 10666 92 � 93 10676 121 10665 24 'w ��(/ 8C 22697 D 118 0 32 < 33 34 35 10655 10658 v BCP 19533 95 10673 10666 37 23 V 10656 119 '140 B 148 1 6 40 PARK 96 /�' 10650 _ e r7 p640 �1 2�s� 16663 ,I,L�• 22 G 39 s 10653 C` N� 19 38 17 97 21 20 0 76 �°77 p PARK BCP 24067 78 7T PCL. A 7$ 79 PARK McCLURE DR. 80 81 .� BCP 13498 106 p�h� h 82 10521 3 86 85 F ry PARK 15 16 17 18 87 �. mho 88 6C tip a°� 83 83 1psp7 �' 84 BCP 1485 • N loaot P 75957 . C� 5 P 1 4 P 75957 3 PGA 1�ae 6 P 18280 2 o SUBJECT PROPERTIES 10 ^ 1p566 10552 1psej F 5 1 P 75957 P 75957 10583 10578 P 72100 P 72100 6 7 10570 10579 5 g 10529 10530 t— O 4 04 1� 0 10481 � <i N 3 9 10469 10470 District of Pitt Meadows: - --� E6var Valley i r-- Henry District of 1U61on SCALE 1:2,500 Langley River P 72103 1 P 12923 2 10501 ■ / 10500 P 12923 P 18280 Rem 1 8 i 10578 245B STREET & 10601 JACKSON ROAD CORPORATION OF ,T THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE NIAMEPLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: Oct 11, 2006 FILE: RZ/104/06 BY: PC APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6697-2009 A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "B" & "C" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:. 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6697-2009 2. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 5 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 75957 New Westminster District. And Lot 6 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 75957 New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 785, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this bylaw are hereby redesignated to Conservation 3. Schedule "C" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 5 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 75957 New Westminster District. And Lot 6 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 75957 New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 786, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby amended by adding Conservation. 4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 200. READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 200. READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER 24 `'rsw 1 1 1 1 28 75�� �\�o� aA h 27 ti �B� 89 k1 1 15 �N r06g6 ry 12 +° 26 116 12 70686 676 yk� y`' # Qy 10 10 B AVE• 25 90 91 rya h ry 4 1 17 12 10 �06 36 10568 Sc92 93 94 f067s118 1 ❑ v 24 f X. �' 220" 7 m 106 ,N32 ti33 034 a35 ! BCP 19533 95 1069 { 1066� o 37 3 B P 14 51 106y� 4 a�� PARK 1065 1 1950 96 1a6A0 1 22 39 sY,s 0.646 ho 10661 � 7065 h N 19 38 t- 97 20 2^ ~ $ w 16 77 6 a 1 PARK p 134 ] 3 k�ti 78 7 BCP 13498 a ti rc y 79 97 ti 80 PARK 98 McCLURE DR. ryb� �t7h 81 82 "-o `��146 0 1 q Q os 4 tik h6h �h Rem1 83 147 p� h h h n a 86 85 PARK 15 16 17 18 as 8 gC kry ti rykra eCP p 7 ti ti°� 'B 148 oe, I �k ]�fl P' 1797 �J BCP 14851 7) / P1777 P4 PARK 1 \ P 75957 1060> 1 l\ 3 4 P 75957 �--- / 10606 _ 1 0.435 ho / p, m 3 N S\8 7 1 0 O a 10588 1.361 ha 1 m BCP 2 —RW 75958 -------� 'oSs ] � w.! t r — — — — 9 r RW 75958 °'r- r 67 1 18�os 1p565 / 0.860 ho I 'rn r y o i Q�� �'ss `v BCP 29522 / 5 I L 21�o0s�s 10.582 7 U 8 P 75957 I I r�$1W "OS ss' m f058 I I Cif A ��F 1 580 10578 P 72103 �p�-9❑ 10570 9 1 P 72100 22 �s 8 0 f05 N 7 1 1 23 705.s�- Lo 0 2 m 7056 10570 1.601 ho 7p5{� 1 4 3 N P 129 m fora 6 I fo s 8 4 o_ 5 2 1052s I m rose 1053o I 10507 10500 2.173 h O I MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6697-2009 Map No. 785 From: Low/Medium Density Residential To: Conservation MAPLE RIDGE 1:2500 28 75 k1 � /1 24 27 7 v e ry 115 123 ti tp6a 89 Z'1 10696 10 26 �hd 116 U 12 j0576 hk ] h 10686 10 6 AVE 25 to 90 tip a x 1 17 1 � 06 10691 `� 12 68 r� 36 92 � 93 � g`1 � 10676 1 r066 24— .P o� BC 226 7 118 0 ry3435 355 23 �BCP 19533 9106662 33034 r0673ry7J0 B P 14 51 10850 c1 4 �v PARK 96 7p636119 y h 1064022 A `r 39 0.646 he CDf056S �A�P �G s�'s 4 38 1063 V. 0 N 21 20 19 97 76 o a t m * C.1 77 PARK 8t 134 P 78 BCP 13498 �, 133 79 9 PARK 98 � McCLURE DR. ry ti ��� y�, 90 81 C�,p Naa 7 ry� 0y 82 2S L�O1 46 a e ti N 86 85 k`°7� os ACE a� �h Rem 83 �y 6Gj47 0� PARK 15 15 17 18 8$ 8 ry�� eCp p ry�� y$'� / 148. BCP 14 51 C 784 779 j ti B P' 1797 \ c� CP 1798 P1797 P 7509T- PARK 1 1 P 75957 10501 1 � ` 3 4 P 75957 / � — — — 7059 10506 2 � l 1 0.435 he / 1059 N l dy 0.429 he 6 / / Q� d� 3 N 1S9 q r '4sb, IZ 9g 1.361 he / 7@ •Qs�o s1 "7 j05 ,off 9Q 1 4 m BCP 2 5 — RW 7595$ —RW 75958 'ps 7 18� 6 rn / 0.860 he 2 10582 N BCP 29522 / 5 1 o oss 8 r 7 c�> P 75957 'psrs 70.5 ass 1 O m ' 05P 10578 ( Of P 72103 r110 am, 10570 9 1 P 72100 22 in 1 � V- 105T , 10558 8 o m 7 23 2 loss 10570 a 1.601 he 10548 s n -CD 4-3 '05" N P 129 70s3s "� 1 �a 4 8 70525 5 m to52s 105m 2 0 70501 70500 2.173 h O MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 6697-2009 Map No. 786 PURPOSE: TO ADD TO CONSERVATION ON SCHEDULE C MAPLE RIDGE 1:2500 APPENDIX C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6698-2009 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6698-2009." 2. Those parcels or tract) of land and premises known and described as: Lot 5 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 75957 New Westminster District. And Lot 6 Section 10 Township 12 Plan 75957 New Westminster District. and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1464 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200. READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200. READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER ►v►tiHLL KIDUE LONE AMENDING I Bylaw No. 6698-2009 Map No.. 1464 From: RS-2(One Family Suburban Residential) To: RS= 1 b(One Family Urban(medium density) Residential) MAPLE RIDGE 9ril�,h Columh�a 1:2500 APPENDIX D ■ 2 ; / �| §|��|§§�■ §| / � °■ �'� / Rd& \ \§ E / §)' \ j \ c Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District Of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: October 17, 2011 and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council Workshop Club Climax - Liquor License Application - Extension of Hours of Operation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB) has received an application from Club Climax at 11935 207th Street for an extension of their hours of operation. The purpose of the increase in hours of operation is to provide service to their customers directly after normal working hours at 4:00 p.m. where currently they cannot open until 7:00 p.m. One of the considerations utilized by the LCLB in reviewing an application for occupancy increases of a liquor primary license is a resolution from the local government. A number of regulatory criteria must be addressed in the Council resolution as well as comments pertaining to the views expressed by area residents. Council may choose to support the application, not support the application or indicate they do not wish to comment. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. That Council supports the application by Club Climax at 11935 207th Street Maple Ridge for an extension of hours of liquor service to 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. 7 days a week as an amendment to Liquor Licence No. 213427, the existing Liquor Primary Licence based on the information contained in the Council report dated October 17, 2011. 2. That a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch in accordance with the legislative requirements. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: In April 2011 Club Climax submitted an application (Appendix 1) to the LCLB for an extension of their hours of operation to their Liquor Primary License for their facility at 11935 207th street. LCLB has completed their initial review of the application and have determined applicant suitability and eligibility for the establishment type. The Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw does permit a liquor primary establishment at this location and the business has a current and valid Business Licence. The premises in question is fronted by 207th street between Lougheed Highway and Dewdney Trunk Road and is primarily surrounded by commercial utilized property. The attached map (Appendix II) compares the subject site to the surrounding neighbourhood. The second phase of the application process is the gathering of public input on the application request. surrounding neighbourhood. The second phase of the application process is the gathering of public input on the application request. The LCLB guidelines request a specific Council resolution commenting on the application in terms of community impacts which may occur as a result of the proposed change to the establishment operations as a result to the proposed change to the Liquor Primary License at this particular location. Part of the process requires Council to gather views of the residents who may be affected by the establishment of the liquor primary license in their neighbourhood. In following the public input requirement, 527 letters were sent to owners and occupants of property within approximately 300 metres of the subject site with the vast majority of the recipients being residents and the rest of the property owners showing as registered companies. There were three responses to the 527 letters sent to surrounding property owners and occupants. These responses are attached as (Appendix III) for Council's reference. The District also posted a public notice in the local newspaper running two separate editions in the week of October 5th and 71h 2011. There was one telephone enquiry in response to this advertisement for the purpose of seeking clarification on how to address Council on this matter. The Maple Ridge RCMP Detachment was asked for their input on this matter and they have confirmed they do not have any operational issues with this application however they did note that this particular establishment does not currently participate in the District's Bar Watch Program. The applicant was asked about the possibility of participating in Bar Watch in the future and she confirmed that it was her intent to re-establish contact with the program in the near future. There is adequate parking, on the subject property to satisfy municipal parking requirements for this proposed additional use. The access road to the property, 207th Street, has steady traffic due to its commercial location and the fact the subject property is located on a section of the street directly between Lougheed Highway and Dewdney Trunk Road. It is not anticipated that increasing the hours of operation for this business by 3 hours in the late afternoon is going to make any noticeable change to the parking, traffic or noise generation in the area. The three closest liquor primary licensed premises to the subject property are: • Fox's Reach at 20398 Dewdney Trunk Road, whose current hours of operation are 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight Sunday to Thursday and 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday; • Houstons Pub and Grill at 21525 Dewdney Trunk Road, whose hours of operation are 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight Monday to Thursday, 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday and 11:00 to 12:00 midnight on Sundays (this facility is currently closed for renovations); • By Baily's Pub at 11232 Dartford, whose hours of operation are from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight Monday to Thursday, 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday and 11:00 a.m. to Midnight Sundays. Staff recommend Council approve this licence change to the hours of liquor service request based upon the following: this is an existing licensed establishment that is requesting a small increase of 3 hours a day to their operation; consideration of the fact that the three other closest licensed facilities currently have considerably longer operating hours; it is not anticipated that there will be any noticeable change to the parking, traffic or noise generation in the area should the licence change to the hours of operation be approved. b) Desired Outcome(s): That Council support the application from Club Climax to extend their hours of operation as requested„ c) intergovernmental Issues: Both local government and the provincial government have an interest in ensuring that liquor regulations are followed and that licenses establishments have the support of their communities. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: The review of this application has taken into consideration the potential for concerns from surrounding business and residential properties in terms of parking, traffic and noise generation as well as the proximity of schools and similar establishments. e) Interdepartmental Implications: The Licensing, Permits and Bylaws Department has coordinated in the review process and solicited input from the public, other municipal departments as well as the RCMP. f) Alternatives: To not approve the application or to provide conditions to the approval. CONCLUSIONS: That Council pass the necessary resolution supporting the application from Club Climax as submitted based upon the staff findings set out in this report. Prepared and Bylaws Approved: Frank Quinn Gendrarmanag-Publ)Wo� and Development Services Concurrence: J.L. f im) Rule Chief Administrative Office AUG-25-2311 09:19 From:LlQUOR LICENCING 2503566971 T o: 61604467732'3 Appendix BRI I1SHI C,01..Cf -Ni RT A Ili- I%vxr 1Macv nn r'arth DATE: August 25, 2011 FROM: Liquor Control and Licensing Branch Name: Trish Howell Phone: (250) 952-7055 Fax: (250) 952-7034 TO: E.S. (Liz) Holitzki Phone: 604-463-5221 Fax: 604-467-7329 No. Pages:9 COMMENTS: letter of extension & application for change of hours for LP # 213427, Club Climax, Maple Ridge, BC per our email conversation today. Thank You Trish Howell Material Contained in the fax may be confidential, and should be delivered only to the Addressee. If all pages are not received please call (250) 952-7055. Ministry of Liquor Control and Mailing Address: Public Safety and Licensing Branch PO Box 9292 Stn Prov Govt Solicitor General Victoria BC V8W 9J8 Telephone: (250) 387-1254 Facsimile: (250) 357-9184 Location: Fourth Floor, 3350 Douglas Street Victoria BC V8Z 3L1 http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/iclb/ HUIa-� -tb11 U'J: IJ r rorn: LiUUUK Lll_tK_INLn rl 1 0: t1tb44t r f.5ty r. LIy ftdfto BRT 1ISH: Coo -UNIRJA '11-ic 15r.sr Kwv nn I:iRh August 24, 2011 E.S. (Liz) Holitzki District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Dear Ms. Holitzki. Job # 710033-25 Email: lolitzki@mapleridge.ca Re: - Request for an Extension on Recommendations and Comments Establishment: Club Climax Liquor Primary Liquor Primary Licence # 213427 Thank you for your August 19, 2011 email, regarding an application to extend the hours of sale at the above -noted establishment. The letter requested an extension of the time allowed for the submission of recommendations and comments by local government. The request has been considered and an extension is approved. The Liquor Control and Licensing Branch will anticipate a resolution by October 28, 2011. Sincerely, Trish Howell Case Manager cc: Rick Farina, Inspector Linda M. Morrison, 0849929 BC Ltd (Email: lindamm9676@shaw.ca) Ministry of Public Safety Liquor Control and Mailing Address: and Solicitor General Licensing Branch PO Box 9292 Stn Prov Govt Victoria BC VBW WEI Telephone: 250 952-5787 Facsimile: 250 952-7066 Location: 4`" Floor, 3350 Douglas Street Victoria BC http:// www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/ldb HUI�-t -ti'11 01j: 1'y r rom: LiUUUK L1l tM_1r1U x � BRI77SH 1111111iftO COLUMBIA 'ltbe tinePlaee nn Fardr RECEIVED APR 2 8 2011 MAPLE: RIOGE LICENSES, PERMITS & BY-LAWS 10:tltU1414t(tom.-3'7 Application for a Permanent Change to a Liquor Licence All Licence Types or Control and Licensing For, LCI-1301Z FILLING OUT THIS FORM: Complete all applicable fields then submit with payment as outlined in Part 14 of this application form. • If you have any questions about this application, call Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB) tole' -free at: 1 666 209-2111. • LCLB forms and supporting materials referred to in this document can be found at: tuww.pssg.gov.bc.callclb For the purposes of this form: • The term Licence includes certltfcate of appointment to operate an on -site of off -rite retail store The term Licensee includes appointee authorized to operate an on -site or off --site retail store • The terms Premisos and Licensed Establishment includes on -site or off -site retail store Licensee Information Licensee name : as shown on licence]: 1 (l� l�� r ri�_nx Establishment name (as shown on licence): — Establishment Location address �iZX f X l � l 4 (as shown on licence) street City Province Postal Code Business Mail addres z _ (If different from sbovo): (��-t' J �l V_1 U r _4 `>� i (l5 S 1-.5 Street city Province Portal Code Business Tel with area code; ��+ , (,'ri% �) Business Fax with area code: Business e-mail:RIn:�;�iry1►"1`�3�� Contact Name f1 `�� � o' i) Title/Position: t 1 firs 1 mlddie Type of Change Requested Please check W appropriate box(es) below and provide licence numbers affected for each requested change. You may complete more than one change section on this form. An incomplete application will be held for a maximum of thirty (30) days. If still incomplete after the thirty (30) day period, the application may be terminated. Type of change requested Ucenee numbers affected MANDATORY JOB NUMEIFR Qttrco use ONLY F 1. Internal Transfer of Shares (p-2) Includes Inlnmal Ama mation (CZ -LE) (- 2. External Transfer of Shares (p.2) (Cl-LE) F_ 3. Change of Directors or Officers (p.2) (C1-LE) r 4. Name change, person (P.3) (C2-LE) r 5. Name change, licensee - corporation (p.3) (02-LE) r 6. Name change, licensee - partnership (p.3) (CZ -LE) )- 7. Name change, licensee - society (p.3) (C2-LE) (- 8. Establishment or licence name change (p.4) (C2-LIC) (sub) F_ 9. Addition of receiver or executor (p.4) (C2-LIC) (sub) r 10. Food -primary entertainment endorsement (p.5) (C2-LIC) (sub) (Ii 11, Change to hours of sale (p.6) 3 (C3-LIC) (sub) "l r 12. Request for change in terms and conditions (p.6) (C3-LIC) (sub) REFER TO PART 17 TO SEE THE APPROVAL PROCESS F[iR T n me CHANGE YOU HAVE REQUESTED LCLB012 fl-ast uprlatad to February 2011) MAC' 17 �011 UOLIOR CONTROL A LICENSING RECEIVED MY 11 2011 PM VC1OFIUBC HUln-e-�-LtUII UJ: 1y r rorn: LiUUUtl LE-tzM.iNla (I 1 0: bibbU44b t f,.Sc:fy Y.4' Ij PART 1. INTERNAL TRANSFER OF SHARES Fee: $110 per licence x licences;;; $ Private corporations only. To be completed when shares have been transferred within the licensee corporation or a holding company within the licensee mrporation, but no new shareholders have been added. This section to be completed by third party operators (private corporations) when an Internal share transfer occurs. Please attach the following. ❑ Signed minuies/resolutions of meeting during which each share transfer or issuance to new shareholder took place 13 Updated Register of Members (shareholders) 0 Updated Register of Directors and Executive Officers Also complete Parts 13 and 14 PART Z EXTERNAL TRANSFER OF SHARES Fee: $330 per licence x licences = $ C1-LE Private corporations only. To be completed when new shareholders have entered the licensee corporation or a holding company within the licensee corporation. This section to be completed by third party operators (private corporations) when an external share transfer occurs. Please attach the following: 0 Signed minutes/resolutions of meeting during which each share transfer or issuance to new shareholder took place O Updated Register of Members (shareholders) ❑ Updated Register of Directors and Executive Officers ❑ If new shareholder is a corporation, attach the Certificate of Incorporation. Memorandum of Authorized Capital, Resolution(s) allocating shares to all current shareholder; and the Current Register of Members. Note: As an alternative to the above corporate documents, applicants may submit a /offer from a B.C. lawyerproviding all of the assantial information contained within the documents_ See 'Lawyar's Letter' available on LCLB's wabsite publication index. ❑ Completed Consent for Disclosure of Criminal Record Information (RCMP GRC35a4) for all required individuals. (Please note: You must complete Pees 1, 4 and 5 o/ the Consent /or DiwJosuro lomf and all category boxes must be inittalled in section 5) Refer to the LCL8 web page for information on criminal record Searches — www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/ldb/licensing/piminal-records.htm ❑ Completed Personal History Summary and Consent for Criminal Record Search (LCL8004) fortes for all required, individuals. 17-1 Statutory Declaration must be completed by all individuals that answered 'yes' to 2, 3 or 9 in the personal History Summary and Consent for Criminal Record Search form. ❑ Photocopy of primary proof of identity for each of the above individuals. Acceptable photo identification includes a driver's licence from a Canadian jurisdiction, passport or BCID cord. Also complete Parts 13 and 14 PART 3. CHANGE OF DIRECTORS OR OFFICERS C1- LE for Corporations and Societies Fee: $110 per licence x licences = $ To be completed when there are changes in directors or officers of a corporation or society within the licensee legal entity. Note: ff an internal transfer of shares accompanies this change, only complete and pay the internal share bsnsfer application fee. Please attach the following documents, and the additional documents below according to type of legal entity: ❑ Completed Consent for Disclosure of Criminal Record Information (RCMP GRC3584) for all required individuals. (Please note: lbu must complete Part 1, 4 and 5 of the Consent for OisrJosum form and at/ tatWOry boxes trust be initialled in 380on 5) Refer to the LOL13 web page for information on criminal recorel searches — www_pssg.govbc.caAcIbAieensing/criminal-recards,htm ❑ Completed Personal History Summary and Consent for Criminal Record Seamh (LCLS004) forms for all required individuals. 0 Statutory Declaration must be completed by all individuals that answered "yet' to 2, 3 or 9 in the Parsonel History Summary and Consent for Criminal Record Search form. O Photocopy of primary proof of identity for each of the above individuals, Acceptable photo identification includes a driver's licence from a Canadian jurisdiction, passport or BCID card. ❑ Private corporation: Updated Register of Directors and Executive Officers Public corporation: ❑ Notice of Directors Q List of Executive Officers 0 Societies: Current list of Officers and Directors Also complete Parts 13 and 14 art ceffmora7ERSIN ~ RECEIVED Page2of9 MAY 11 2.11 PM VICTORIABC HUIa-c�-cfUl l Oj: LU r roin: L11=!UUK L1l.tM-iNU (1 1 u : dItDU4`+G ((Jt7 r. :/' 7 PART 4. PERSON'S NAME CHANGE — Sole Proprietor, Partnerr, Shareholder, Director, Officer (All licence classes) Fee; $110 per licence x To be completed when a person holding an interest in a licence has legally changed his or her name. Person's name (in full) LAST NAME / FIRST NAME I MIDDLE NAME Name changed to (in full). LAST NAME I RRST NAME / MIDDLE NAME Please attach the following: ❑ Copy of Certificate of Name Change, Marriage Certificate, etc. Also complete Parts 13 and 14 PARTS. LICENSEE NAME CHANGE Corporation Name Fee: $110 per licence x To be completed when a corporation with an interest in a licence has legally changed its name, but existing corporate shareholders, directors and officers have not changed. Current licensee or holding company name (in full): Name changed to (in full): Please attach the following: rl Copy of Certificate of Incorporation showing change of name. Also complete Parts 13 ana 14 PART 6. LICENSEE NAME CHANGE Partnership Business Name Fee: $110 per licenco x licences = $ To be completed when the legal name of a partnership is changed but no new partners are added and no existing partners are deleted_ Current registered partnership name (in fun): Name changed to (in full): Please attach the following: ❑ If a registered partnership, a copy of a partnership registration document from the t3C Registrar of Companies showing the change of name. ❑ If the partnership is not registered, provide a legal document showing change of name. Also complete Parts 13 and 14 PART 7. LICENSEE NAME CHANGE Society Name Fee: $110 per licence x licences = S To be completed when the legal name of a society is changed, but the society structure, membership and certification number on the certificate of incorporation does not change. Pleases note- A Liquor -Primary Club Licence held by a society is void if the society and its membership ceases to exist. (Liquor Control and Licensing Act, Section 24) Current registered society name (in full): Name changed to (in full): Please attach the following: ❑ Copy of Certificate of Incorporation under the Societies Act showing change of name. Also complete Parts 13 and 14 LIQUOR CpM OL & LICENSWG RECEIVED MAY 11 2011 PM tfI"IA9C Page 3 of 9 HUI3-t�- -tUl i UJ: tU r r0M: LiUUU : Lil..tM_iHU (i 1 0: tltu Hb ( (.3t1J r'. b' y PART 10. FOOD -PRIMARY (restaurant' ENTERTAINMENT ENDORSEMENT Please choose (one only) the type of entertainment applied for. ❑ (a) Patron non -participation entertainment endorsement (musicians, etc.). ❑ submit a letter of intent describing, in detail, the form of patron non -participation entertainment proposed. Fee: $110 per licence x licences = $ laid ❑ (b) Patron participation entertainment endorsement (dance floor, karaoke, etc.). This enterialment must end by midnight O submit a letter of intent describing, in detail, the form of patron participation entertainment proposed. The letter of intent must address: the potential for noise, the impact on the community and whether the endorsement may result in the establishment being operated in a manner that is contrary to its primary purpose: and ❑ request a local govemment/First Nation resolution commenting on the application (local govemment must complete Part 1B of this form; for further information on local govemment resolutions, read Part 15). • If applicable, complete the appropriate Application for a Structural Change (LCLB012a or LCLB012c) and include any requests for changes to licensed capacity. If you are requesting a change to your establishment's hours of liquor sale in conjunction with the entertainment application, complete Part 11 of this form. Any requests for Food -Primary hours of liquor sale later than midnight require a local govemment/First Nation resolution supporting the application. There are restrictions related to forms of entertainment, sound systems, etc. If you are uncertain about any of the details of your proposal, please consult with licensing staff at LCLB in Victoria (see contact information on page one). Fee: $330 per licence x licences = S Note — When relocating a Food -Primary establishment An endorsement for patron participation entertainment cannot transfer location without local govemmentlFirst Nations comment and LCLB approval. This is required because the local govemment/First Nation must be provided an opportunity to reconsider the impact of the endorsement on the community given the establishment's new location. Use this section to reapply for the endorsement but do not pay the application fee(s). Are you submitting an application to transfer the location of a Food -Primary licence with this application? ❑ yes ❑ no Also complete Parts 13 and 14 UOUORWN ROL a ut RECEIVED MAY 1 1 2011 5 of 9 PM VCTMIA BC UJ:tl I-rom:LI UUK L1l.tNl_iM3 t�>U_5Z,tby(1 10:blbU'44t((Sty 1_%('y PAR 111. CHANGE TO HOURS OF SALE (Liquor -Primary, Liquor -Primary Club, Food Primary 6 Winery endorsements) Pursuant to Section 12(3) of the Liquor Control and Licensing Act, the general manager may limit the days and hours that an establishment is permitted to be open for the sale of liquor. Hours of liquor sales for Food -Primary establishments must be in keeping with the dining habits of the clientele expected. Liquor must not be served unless the establishment is open for the service of a varied selection of menu items. Licensees may apply to revise hours of sale, subject to any restrictions within the Liquor Control and Licensing Ac(, Regulations, branch policies and/or original terms and conditions of licensing. In some instances, the general manager of the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch may require the licensee to post public notices before a decision to alter licence hours is considered. Check (�) the appropriate change, and provide the requested information and documents; ❑ (a) Food -Primary — request to change hours of liquor sales before midnight. complete proposed hours of sale table below Fee: $110 per Ilcenco x licences = $ 0 (b) Food -Primary — request to extend hours of liquor sales later than midnight (Note: patron participation entertainment must end by midnight) ❑ complete proposed hours of liquor sale table below, and ❑ request a local government/First Nation reaolution commenting on the application (local government must complete Part 16 of this form; for further information on local government resolutions, read Part 15) Fee: $330 per licence : licences = $ (c) Liquor -Primary, Liquor -Primary Club or Winery Lounge — any change to hours of sale (earlier opening or later closing) Fee. $330 per licence x licences = $ 3� `— ❑ complete proposed hours of liquor sale table below, and ❑ request a local government/First Nation resolution commenting on the application (local government must complete Dart 16 of this form; for further information on local government/First Nation resolutions, read Part 15) Please complete the table below, indicating proposed hours of liquor sales and days closed. Current Hours of Liquor Sale: ^ Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Open ��]' ".� �,.�, �'.a� f�. �;� 1"00 e'. 11.W �� �i►-. Close p'n' j am �,� Gm Z'&: �� �� 6i^' �;� G0) � a^� �� Q✓') Proposed Hours of Liquor Sale: .........._ Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Open 403 P'n �';� Prr'1 ` 6� (�'1) � � PM �� ".d j�/I► a[J O,f) Corm q,,. en Close �—__ �r�U� 2�} «� Z<xs cam �, �I �'` ZrJ1 �m [FAQ a�►1 . Reason for change in hours; -�o �(_i��,�� a(J�, F� � o � �a �thplic'ation? Are you s bmitting an application to trans er the lion f a o rimary licence N th O yes o Note — Relocating a Food -Primary establishment An endorsement for hours of liquor service after midnight cannot transfer location Without local govemment/First Nations comment and LCLB approval. Use Pan 11b (above) to reapply for the endorsement but do not pay the application fee(s). OR, use Part 10b (on page 5) to reapply for Patron Participation. Also complete Parts 13 and 14 PART 12. REQUEST FOR A CHANGE IN TERMS AND CONDITIONS Fee: $110 per licence x licences = $ This section may be used for special requests to the general manager of LCLB for exceptions to policy related to the terms and conditions of a liquor licence. Please attach: 0 A letter of intent describing, in detail, the proposed change to your licence and the reasons for th?AE st. Also complete Parts and 14 1,tOt)6 LIC�NSWGP sof911 2011 Twee HUn-&Z>-ckU11 by: `l r rurn: LiWIJUN 1-11,tNLiNU (1 1 0: tit)U44t r sty r. b/ J PAR 13: DECLARATION My signature (the licensee's) below indicates I understand and acknowledge: All of the information given is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. Section 15(2) of the Liquor Control and Lkansing Act states, "A person applying for the issue, renewal, transfer or amendment of a licence who fails to disclose a material fad required by the form of application or makes a false or misleading statement in the form of application, commits an offence'. Signature of applicants (signature of signing officer of a company or society, sole proprietor or all individuals in a partnership): Name 1 Signatu Position held Date LAST NAME I FIRST NAME / MIDDLE NAME t" f '�AM I DD I ry LAST NAMF I FIRST NAME I MIDDLE NAME LAST NAME I FIRST NAME I MIDDLE NAME ty$TNAME I FIRST NAME I MIDDLE NAME MM I DD I YY MM 100 r1Y MM IDDIYY PART 14: APPLICATION FEES — Payment Options Fees may be paid by cheque, money order, debit or credit card. Debit transactions can only be made in person at the Victoria Head Office. See contact information on page one. Submit the payment with the application form. Do not mail cash. �Enclosed payment is by (check one): cheque, payable to the Minister of Finance (a $20.00 NSF fee will be charged for NSF cheques). ❑ money order, payable to the Minister of Finance. ❑ VISA ❑ MasterCard Credit card number. - - Expiry date: . MM I w Name of cardholder (as it appears on card), Signature of cardholder: _ If paying by credit card, the applicant may MAIL this application form, or TELEPHONE LCLB Head Office directly to provide the credit card number and expiry date. ❑ I am paying by credit card and will contact LCLB with my -card number. TOTAL FEE SUBMITTED $ SUBMIT FEE AND APPLICATION FORM TO A .TORIA OFFICE ONLY Mailing address: Drop off location Liquor Control and Licensing Branch Liquor Control and Licensing Branch PO Box 9292 SM Prov Govt Second Floor, 1019 wharf Street Victoria, SC V8W We victoria, BC V8W 2Y9 'ONTROL A LICEHS� 11000 .0 I Pace 7 of 8 MAV 112011 PM VNVw1hoc HUI3-t�:>-tUI I UJ: L1 t- rorn: L1UUUK Lil-tM-iNli L: U.5z•bby (1 1 0 : b1bU44b ((sty f✓. y/y PART 15: LOCAL GOVERNMENTIFIRST NATION RESOLUTIONS: Information for the Applicant For the following change types, a resolution from your local government or First Nation, commenting on the application, is required: • Part 10(0)' F000-primary patron participation entertainment endomement • Parts 11(b) and 11(c): Change to hours of sales Licensers responsibilities: • Fill out appropriate change application sections in this form. Request your focal government/First Nation sign and date Part'16 of this forth, • Provide a photocopy of This form to the local government/First Nation and request that a resolution be provided within 90 days and sent directly to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch, Victoria Head Office. • Send the original forth and application fees to the branch. • The Liquor Control and Licensing Branch will follow up with the local government/First Nation if a resolution has not been received by the branch within 90 days of the local government's receipt of your request. Your local government/First Nation may decide that it does not wish to provide comment on your change request. However, they must still provide a resolution stating this decision and this resolution must be submitted to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch, For more information on resolutions regarding B.C. liquor licences, please visit the LCLB Web site publication index to consult the guide Rote of Local Government and First Nation at http:/Mrww.psV.gov.bc.caAclb/publicationsAndex.htm PART 18: LOCAL GOVERNMENT/FIRS'f NATION CONFIRMATION Of RECEIPT OF APPLICATION To be filled out by your local government or First Nation office in relation to sections 10(b), 11(b) and 11(c) of this fort, Local government/First Nation (name): Local police jurisdiction; Date: ^ Y ---- Name of official (printed): Position: LA$T NAME I FIRST NAME I MIOOLE NAME Signature This application serves as notice from the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch that an application for a permanent change to a liquor licence is being made within your community. The Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB) requests that a resolution commenting on the application be sent to the LCLB Victoria Head Office within 90 days of the above date of receipt If more than 90 days is required to provide a resolution, please contact the branch to make a request to the general manager for an extension. If the local government/ First Notion decides not to provide comment, a resolution indicating this decision must be provided to the branch. Please be advised that if the LCLB does not receive a resolution or a request for an extension within 90 days, the general manager is authorized to review the application without a resolution, considering factors (a) through (d) below, and make a derision about the application. All of the items outlined below in points (a) through (d) must be addressed in the resolution in order for the resolution to comply with section 53 of the Liquor Control and Licensing Regulation. Any report presented by an advisory body or aub-commlttee to the council or board may be referenced in and attached to the resolution. (a) The potential for noise if the application is approved (provide comments). (b) The impact on the community if the application is approved (provide comments). (c) Whether the amendment may result in the establishment being operated in a manner that is contrary to its primary pur- pose (provide comments only If the application is from a food -primary licence for an extension of hours of servico past midnight or the addition of patron participation entertainment). (d) The views of residents if the licence amendment may affect nearby residents (describe the views of residents, the method used to gather the views and provide comments and recommendations with respect to the views. If the views of residents were not gathered, provide reasons). For more information on resolutions regarding B.C. liquor licences, please visit the LCLB Web site publication index to consult the guide Role of Local Government and First Nation at htip://www.pssg.gov.be,caAclb/publications/index.htm I $Ofi1'R,11- 11 L""U Ka+w" ED MAI 1 1 2011 Page 9 of 9 PM y�1t1AgC /XPPCIIUTA 11 Me N SCALE 1:3,500 P District of Langley izz � 1 t s �d�H�NIVnr 11935 207 Street �l J i _' E DATE: Oct 12, 2011 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE LICENSES, PERMITS & BYLAWS DEPT. BY: DT Oct. 7, 2011 4:20PM u0. Appendix III District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC Canada V2X 6A9 Attention: RECEIVED OCT 072Q11 MAPLE LICENSES, PERMITSGE &BYLAWS I am writing against the request for the Club Climax establishment located on 207th Ave in Maple Ridge to extend their hours from 7:00 pm to 4:00 pm. My reasons are there are three establishments within a 4 block radius already offering the same service. They are the Buffalo Club, Fox's Reach, Houstons Pub and Grill (located on Dewdney) and By Baily's Pub located across from the CanFor sawmill. At this time there is not a need to open earlier as there are a lot of options available within a 4 block radius. Why do we need more?? Z 4 �7%1 @91111WM ED 1�t1 YO R Cheryl Ennis From: Sent: October-09-115:26 PM To: Mayor Council and CAO Users List Subject: Liquor primary license application (club Climax) Mr. Mayor and Council, I recently received your Public Notice stating that Club Climax situated on 11935 207 St., Maple Ridge has requested new hours of liquor sale. consider myself and my family affected by this application because not only we have to live so close to this immoral business that now they even want to open earlier. I have always asked myself how a business like this can be so close to a resident area and schools. When we bought our house on _ _ , we did not notice that we were going to live so close to this kind of business. My wish is that this business can be situated somewhere else or close their doors. For all the people that visit this kind of place, they should have it in their own backyard if they like it so much. Thank you, RECEIVED Al CAD--��'GM ,,R-FCTTTT0N-DE8K ot Council of the District of MaplePmjdga Action: C_; 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge BC Canada V2XIQ- 6A9 RE-': Public Opinion on Proposed Changes to the LiquorPrima ry License Application for, 'Club Climax -11935 2,07", Street, Maple Ridge Dear Council: I want to praise district staff for havjng accepted this application because it opens the door for District Council to do something - do something about patrons arriving and departing from the above mentioned establishment. In my opinion, the patrons arriving and departing from the above establishment are considered a public nuisance. its my hope that District Council makes an order to increase police presence during the Applicant's business hours - increased police presence to help move patrons off the streets. The cost of increased police presence could be dovinloaded onto the Applicant, and in turn, the costs could be reflected in the Applicant's liquor sale prices, Thank you for the opportunity to present my opinion. Respectfully Yours 4 MAPLE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer DATE: November 7, 2011 ATTN: Committee of the Whole Scrap Metal Dealer Regulation Bylaw and Other Related Bylaw Amendments For the past year staff has been working with a lower mainland Task Force on Scrap Metal Dealers in an attempt to draft a standard bylaw to regulate the scrap metal dealers in all the local jurisdictions. The City of Vancouver was the first to pass a Bylaw in this area however they have slightly different authority under their Vancouver Charter than the other municipalities involved in the Task Force. Several Task Force meetings have been held, for the most part, in the Township of Langley to discuss common problems and solutions on the matter and the District of Maple Ridge was asked to put together a draft Bylaw for the group to consider. This work was completed and presented to the Task Force in November 2010. Since that time additional work has been done on the Bylaw including consultation with our municipal solicitor. The Maple Ridge Scrap Metal Dealer Regulation Bylaw No. 6772-2010 (Appendix 1) was brought before Council at the Council Workshop Meeting of September 26, 2011. Council received the staff report and directed staff to finalize the draft Scrap Metal Dealer Regulation Bylaw No. 6772-2010 and bring it forward to an appropriate Committee of the Whole Meeting for consideration. RECOMMENDATION(S): That Scrap Metal Dealer Regulation Bylaw No. 6772-2010 be given first, second and third readings. FOR10113"Gil a) Background Context: The problem of metal theft using scrap metal dealer as the unauthorized distributors, is a serious North American problem. Large and small communities throughout the United States and Canada are faced with trying to resolve this problem which is both a serious safety problem as well as a cost burden to businesses and residents. In the Lower Mainland, cities like Vancouver, Richmond and Surrey have adopted strong Bylaws that are making great strides in controlling this illegal activity. However as metal theft is being controlled in these larger communities to the west the problem is shifting to the east and communities like Langley, Abbotsford, Port Coquitlam and Maple Ridge are now starting to see this problem manifest in our communities. The Task Force put forth a recommendation to the Province to amend their legislation to assist in controlling this activity which has not been acted on to date. A recent announcement by the Provincial Government with regard to metal theft is discussed later in this report. As a result municipalities are taking on the responsibility to take the necessary action in their own communities. The draft Bylaw is a significant step to bringing this problem under control in our community. b) Desired Outcome If Council adopts the proposed Bylaw the District will have the authority to control the type of scrap metal purchased by Scrap Metal Dealers as well as the length of time they must hold these purchases before reselling or redistributing them to provide the local Police department with an opportunity to determine if the material was obtained illegally. The Bylaw also sets up specific requirements for logging in the specifics of all the material including type and weight, date and time it was obtained and by whom including complete identification. This information will be provided on a routine basis to the local Police Department. If a Scrap Metal Business is found to be operating in contravention of the Bylaw Council will have the authority to suspend or revoke their business licence to operate in the District. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: In compliance with section 59(2) of the Community Charter a notice of the proposed Bylaw was posted in the local newspaper and ran in two consecutive editions of the paper. Furthermore staff wrote individual letters to eight separate business companies operating in Maple Ridge that hold Business Licences in the District that appear to deal in the scrap metal trade providing them with information on the proposed bylaw. Through the newspaper advertisement and the individual letters residents were given the opportunity to provide their comments and concerns on the proposed bylaw in writing by November 2, 2011. The District received one piece of correspondence on this matter citing concerns with the proposed bylaw requirements to store materials for 7 or 21 days. The company feels this would require additional storage on their site that they currently do not have and which they state would be expensive to create. Furthermore, on February 1, 2011 the Provincial Government announced, through the Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General, their intent to pass Bill 13, the Metal Dealers and Recyclers Act to target scrap metal transactions. A copy of the News Release is attached for Council's reference. (Appendix II) While this proposed provincial legislation responds to many municipalities requests, it is unclear at this point how far the legislation will actually go and if it will meet all the needs of individual communities. Bill 13 is not passed yet and the Province has not given us a definite date on when it may be passed. Therefore staff are recommending the District follow through on adopted the proposed Bylaw to protect the District's interests at this time. d) Alternatives: Council could decide to not adopt the Bylaw as drafted and wait to determine if the proposed Provincial Bill 13 will meet the needs and requirements of this problem for the District. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Should Council approve staff's recommendation give the Bylaw three readings and to mov the Bylaw forward for adoption, there will be minor amendments to the Business Licence Bylaw, the Zoning Bylaw and the Ticket Information Bylaw that will also be required to complete this process. CONCLUSIONS: The draft bylaw is the result of extensive consultation with neighbouring municipalities through the Task Force, In adopting the proposed Scrap Metal Bylaw and amending the relating bylaws, the District will have an opportunity to control this type of activity before it creates a serious problem in our community as it has in other communities in the lower mainland. Staff have discussed the proposed Provincial Bill 13 with the RCMP and they concur with staff to move forward with the proposed Bylaw No. 6772-2010 while we determine if the Provincial legislation does meet the all the needs of the municipality. by-.IUz Mitaki irec : Licencgs, -Permits and Bylaws r by: Frank Quinn General Manager: Publirks and Development Services Concurrence: J.L. `im) Mule ChilfAdministrative Office LH/jd Appendix I DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6772 - 2010 A bylaw to regulate dealings in scrap metal WHEREAS Council considers it necessary to regulate the business of purchasing scrap metal in the District of Maple Ridge; AND WHEREAS the District has given notice of Council's intention to adopt this bylaw and has provided an opportunity for persons who consider themselves affected by this bylaw to make submissions to Council pursuant to s. 59 of the Community Charter, and Council is satisfied that reasonable notice has been provided; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge in open meeting assembled enacts as follows: CITATION 1. This bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Scrap Metal Dealer Regulation Bylaw No. 6772- 2010". INTERPRETATION 2. In this bylaw: "Business Day" means any calendar day, including any holiday, during which a Scrap Metal Dealer is open for business to one or more members of the public; "Bylaw Enforcement Officer" means any Bylaw Enforcement Officer or Licence Inspector appointed by the Council to enforce District bylaws; "District" means the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge; "Commercial Transaction" means a Transaction whereby a Scrap Metal Dealer pays a Seller by cheque drawn on an account in the name of the Scrap Metal Dealer at a financial institution, and which cheque is mailed by the Scrap Metal Dealer to the address indicated by the Seller and the payment includes HST as a component of the total; "Council" means the Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge; "Goods Information" means the following information about a Transaction: (i) the price or other consideration paid for the Scrap Metal; (ii) the method of payment; (iii) the weight and type of Scrap Metal; Page 1 of 12 (v) identifiable or distinguishing marks on the Scrap Metal including, where applicable, identification of the item as Selected Scrap Metal; and (vi) the origin of the Scrap Metal; "Licence Inspector" means the District's Director of Licences, Permits and Bylaws and any authorized designate; "Non -Commercial Transaction" means any Transaction by a Scrap Metal Dealer that is not a Commercial Transaction; "Picture Identification" means one or more of the following, provided that it is not more than five years old and includes a photograph of the bearer: (i) valid driver's licence issued by a Canadian province or territory or any state within the United States of America; (i i) valid Provincial identity card; (iii) valid passport issued by the Government of Canada or by a government of a foreign state recognized by Canada; (iv) valid certificate of Indian status issued by the Government of Canada; (v) valid certificate of Canadian citizenship issued by the Government of Canada; or (vi) valid conditional release card issued by Correctional Services Canada; "Police" means the Officer in Charge at the Maple Ridge RCMP Detachment and includes his or her designate; "Purchase" includes buy, take in barter or trade, and receive; "Registers" means the Goods Information register and the Seller Information register as referred to in this bylaw; "Scrap Metal" includes Scrap Metal Ferrous, Scrap Metal Nonferrous, and Selected Scrap Metal, but does not include used cans or containers for food, beverages, paint, or domestic or household products normally recycled to avoid waste; "Scrap Metal Dealer" means a person who carries on the business of Purchasing Scrap Metal; "Scrap Metal Nonferrous" means a metal or alloy that is free of iron or comparatively so, including but not limited to: (i) copper, including brass and bronze; (i i) aluminium, excepting those with the phrase "beverage can"; Page 2 of 12 (iii) zinc; (iv) magnesium; (v) lead; (vi) nickel; "Scrap Metal Ferrous" means used items made principally of iron, steel, or tin other than Selected Scrap Metal; "Selected Scrap Metal" means used metal items which bear any markings of, or are unique to any of the following: (i) public utilities distributing through piping or wiring, electricity, telephone services or cable television signals, including but not limited to items marked with any of the following words "British Columbia Hydro", "British Columbia Transmission Corporation", "Telus", "Shaw" or "Rogers"; (ii) extruded aluminium of the type used in display signs; (iii) civic street and traffic signs, manhole lids, catch basin grates, water valve lids, and any other items marked with the name of a local government; (iv) grave markers; (v) aluminium ladders bearing any identifying markings from a public agency, local government, school district, similar corporation or corporation the shares of which trade on any stock exchange; (vi) materials identified in a report or bulletin delivered to a Scrap Metal Dealer by a municipal police department or R.C.M.P. detachment as having been reported stolen; (vii) wire that has been burned; "Seller" means a person who sells or otherwise disposes of Scrap Metal to a Scrap Metal Dealer; "Seller Information" means: (i) the full name, current address and telephone number of the person from whom the Scrap Metal was Purchased by the Scrap Metal Dealer; (i i) confirmation of the identify of the Seller by way of Picture Identification , together with a complete description of the Picture Identification and the name of the authority that issued it; (iii) in a case where the Seller is not the owner of the Scrap Metal, the full name, street address, telephone number and if applicable, HST registration number of that owner. Page 3 of 12 "Transaction" means any process by which Scrap Metal comes into the possession of a Scrap Metal Dealer, including a Purchase from a Seller. MAINTENANCE AND USE OF GOODS INFORMATION REGISTER Requirements 3. Every Scrap Metal Dealer must establish and maintain a record, to be called the Goods Information Register, of all his or her Transactions involving Scrap Metal Nonferrous or Selected Scrap Metal. Transaction Entry 4. Immediately after a Transaction involving any Scrap Metal Nonferrous or Selected Scrap Metal, a Scrap Metal Dealer must set out in the Goods Information Register in chronological date order„ in the English language, the Goods Information for that Transaction. Maintenance and Reporting 5. Every Scrap Metal Dealer must: (a) maintain the Goods Information Register electronically in a form approved by the District; (b) record all information in the Goods Information Register electronically; (c) transmit to the Police by facsimile a report of the daily Transactions in the Goods Information Register at the end of each Business Day; and (d) before the close of each Business Day, print out a hard copy of all electronic information recorded during the course of the day, and maintain all such hard copies as a manual version of the Goods Information Register. Handwritten Entries 6. If a Scrap Metal Dealer is temporarily unable to record or transmit information in the Goods Information Register electronically, he or she must: (a) maintain the Goods Information Register in legible handwriting in ink, in the English language, using the form attached to this bylaw as Schedule "A", until electronic recording and transmission is again available so that no omissions or delays or gaps in electronic record keeping or reporting occur; and (b) when electronic recording and transmission is available, immediately record and transmit to the Police electronic entries for all Transactions in the Goods Information Register not previously recorded or transmitted to the Police. Page 4 of 12 MAINTENANCE AND USE OF SELLER INFORMATION REGISTER Requirements 7. Every Scrap Meal Dealer must establish and maintain a record, to be called the Seller Information Register, of all his or her Transactions involving Scrap Metal Nonferrous or Selected Scrap Metal. Transaction Entry 8. Immediately after a Transaction involving any Scrap Metal Nonferrous or Selected Scrap Metal, a Scrap Metal Dealer must set out in the Seller Information Register in chronological date order, in the English language, the Seller Information for that Transaction. Maintenance and Reporting 9. Every Scrap Metal Dealer must: (a) maintain the Seller Information Register electronically in a form approved by the District; (b) record all information in the Seller Information Register electronically; and (c) before the close of each Business Day, print out a hard copy of all electronic information recorded during the course of the day, and maintain all such hard copies as a manual version of the Seller Information Register. Handwritten Entries 10. If the Scrap Metal Dealer is temporarily unable, for good reason, to record information in the Seller Information Register electronically, he or she must: (a) maintain the Seller Information Register in legible handwriting in ink, in the English language, using the form attached to this Bylaw as Schedule "B", until electronic recording is again available so that no omissions or delays or gaps in record keeping occur; and (b) when electronic recording is available, immediately record all Transactions not previously recorded in the electronic Seller Information Registry. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION OF REGISTERS Maintenance 11. A Scrap Metal Dealer must: (a) not amend, obliterate or erase any entry in the Registers; (b) remove any page from the Registers either wholly or partially or electronically or manually; Page 5 of 12 (c) not, permit, allow or suffer any other person to amend, obliterate or erase any entry in the Registers; (d) not permit, allow or suffer any other person to remove any page from the Register either wholly or partially or electronically or manually; (e) immediately report to the Licence Inspector any amendment, obliteration, or erasure of an entry in the Registers or the removal of the Registers or any part thereof from the premises of the Scrap Metal Dealer; (f) take all reasonably necessary steps to ensure that information recorded in the Registers is secure from unlawful access, collection, use, disclosure, or disposal; and (g) maintain on the Scrap Metal Dealer's premises, all records pertaining to each Transaction involving Scrap Metal Nonferrous and Selected Scrap Metal including any written invoice, cancelled cheques and the Registers, for a period of 24 months following the Transaction. Inspection Requirements 12. On request by a Bylaw Enforcement Officer, Licence Inspector or any person authorized to act on behalf of a Bylaw Enforcement Officer or Licence Inspector, a Scrap Metal Dealer must produce the Registers for inspection on the premises of the Scrap Metal Dealer. Time Periods 13. Every Scrap Metal Dealer must: (a) keep on the premises of the Scrap Metal Dealer the Registers or any portion of the Registers that contains any record made or required to be made within the previous 24 months; (b) keep, within the Province of British Columbia, each record entered in the Registers for a period of seven (7) years following the date the record was made; and (c) if the business of the Scrap Metal Dealer is sold, leased, assigned, transferred or disposed of to any person, transfer possession of the entire Registers to the person who bought, leased, took assignment or transfer of the business or to whom the business was otherwise disposed. Transfer of Register 14. A person who receives a Register pursuant to section 13(c) must comply with this bylaw in relation to securing and maintaining the Registers. DISPLAY OF NAME Requirements 15. Every Scrap Metal Dealer shall place and maintain his or her business name and address on: Page 6of12 (a) the front of the business premises in a conspicuous, unobstructed location; and (b) both sides of any vehicle or vessel used in connection with such business. PREMISES, HOURS, MARKINGS, MINORS Requirements 16. A Scrap Metal Dealer must not conduct any Transaction involving Scrap Metal Nonferrous or Selected Scrap Metal: (a) except at the premises designated in the Scrap Metal Dealer's business licence; (b) with any person between 7:00 p.m. of any Business Day and 7:00 a.m. of the next Business Day; (c) of which any serial number or other identifying marks on the Scrap Metal Nonferrous or Selected Scrap Metal appear to have been wholly or partially obliterated, tampered with or removed; (d) with a person: (i) under the age of 19 years; or (ii) who appears to be intoxicated by alcohol or drugs. RETENTION AND MANAGEMENT OF SCRAP METAL Identification and Possession Requirements 17. With respect to each Non -Commercial Transaction involving Scrap Metal Nonferrous and with respect to each Transaction involving Selected Scrap Metal, during the applicable period established in section 18, every Scrap Metal Dealer must: (a) clearly and individually tag each item by date and Transaction identifier; (b) clearly and physically separate each item from other Scrap Metal Nonferrous and Selected Scrap Metal in the Scrap Metal Dealer's premises; (c) not alter, repair, dispose of, sell or in any way part with possession of the Scrap Metal Nonferrous or Selected Scrap Metal, or remove it from the business premises of the Scrap Metal Dealer; and (d) not permit, allow or suffer any other person to alter, repair, dispose of, sell or in any way part with possession of the item or remove it from the business premises of the Scrap Metal Dealer. Page 7of12 Time Period 18. In relation to each Non -Commercial Transaction involving Scrap Metal Nonferrous and in relation to each Transaction involving Selected Scrap Metal, every Scrap Metal Dealer must comply with the requirements of section 17 for the following periods: (a) at least 7 days after the date that a Transaction has been recorded electronically in the Registers; or (b) at least 21 days after the date that a Transaction has been recorded manually in the Registers. Selected Scrap 19. No Scrap Metal Dealer shall purchase Selected Scrap Metal unless the Selected Scrap Metal is delivered to the Scrap Metal Dealer's premises in a vehicle clearly marked as that of the corporation surrendering the Selected Scrap Metal, and the Seller also: (a) has identification showing employment with that corporation or appointment as its agent; and (b) has and surrenders an originally signed letter, on that corporation's usual letterhead, specifically describing the Selected Scrap Metal and authorizing its sale to a Scrap Metal Dealer. 20. No Scrap Metal Dealer shall Purchase Selected Scrap Metal except by way of Commercial Transaction. MIXED BUSINESSES 21. A person who holds a licence for both a Scrap Metal Dealer and an additional business must clearly and physically separate all Scrap Metal from other goods and inventory. EXEMPTIONS 22. This bylaw does not apply to Transactions involving Scrap Metal Ferrous. 23. This bylaw does not apply to a person who is licensed by the Province of British Columbia to deal in used motor vehicles. OFFENCE 24. Any person who violates any provision of this bylaw, or who allows or permits any act or thing to be done in violation of any provision of this bylaw, or who neglects to or refrains from doing anything required to be done by any provision of this bylaw, is guilty of an offence against this bylaw and each day that a violation continues to exist is deemed to be a separate offence against the bylaw. Page 8 of 12 1,MI►rt11111YA 25. Any person who commits an offence contrary to the provisions of this bylaw is liable on summary conviction to a penalty of not less than $1,000 (one thousand dollars) and not more than $10,000 (ten thousand dollars), in addition to the costs of the prosecution. 26. Pursuant to the authority granted in Section 60(4) of the Community Charter, Council hereby delegates to the Director of Licences, Permits and Bylaws the authority to for reasonable cause, cancel, suspend or refuse to issue a business licence to businesses regulated by this bylaw. SEVERABILITY AND HEADINGS 27. If any section, subsection or sub -subsection of this bylaw is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining portions of the bylaw. 28. Headings are included in this bylaw for convenience only. READ A FIRST TIME this day of _'2011 READ A SECOND TIME this day of 2011 READ A THIRD TIME this day of , 2011 ADOPTED this day of 2011 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Page 9of12 SCHEDULE "A" GOODS INFORMATION REGISTER TRANSACTION REPORT Date: I Time: I Transaction Number: RECORD IDENTIFIABLE OR I)fSTtNGUJSHINO.MARKS ON SELECTED SCRAP METAL.i= ,..;: . Material Type Weight Material Type Weight Material Type Weight No. 1 Copper Stainless No. 2 Copper Aluminium Aluminium Brass Radiators Stainless Total Weight (lb s): Total Price Paid $ Paid by ❑ Cheque ❑ Cash RECORD IDENTIFIASLE:OR :DISTINGUISFitT~i MARKS ON SELECTED SCRAP M In rAL Page 10of12 SCHEDULE "A" con't GOODS INFORMATION REGISTER TRANSACTION REPORT METHOD OF PAYMENT Cash HST # (If Commercial Transaction) PREPARED BY: SIGNATURE: Cheaue Page 11 of 12 SCHEDULE "B" SELLER INFORMATION REGISTER Date: Time: Transaction Number: vz SELLER INFORMATION ... ;: w..:.... Q NAME: PHONE #: HOME ADDRESS: DATE OF BIRTH: DESCRIPTION OF PICTURE ID: SELLERS SIGNATURE: rin � OWN INFORMATION IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE NAME: PHONE #: HOME ADDRESS: HST #: VEHIGL.Er INFORMATION MAKE: :77=- TAXI COMPANY NAME: MODEL: TAXI #: COLOUR: TAXI LICENCE PLATE #: LICENCE PLATE #: PREPARED BY: _ SIGNATURE: Page 12of12 Appendix II t �t, BRITI SH C;OLUNIFBi A NEWS RELEASE For Immediate Release Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General 2011PSSG0125-001392 Nov. 1, 2011 Metal theft law to protect public safety, infrastructure VICTORIA — Tracking scrap metal sales across B.C. will help to deter copper thieves, protect 911 emergency service, prevent theft -related power outages and save utilities, municipalities and taxpayers millions of dollars a year, under proposed legislation to be introduced today. Announced as Crime Prevention Week begins in B.C., Bill 13, the Metal Dealers and Recyclers Act, fulfils a key commitment in the Oct. 3 throne speech. If passed, the act will make B.C. the first Canadian province with legislation targeting scrap -metal transactions. Currently, fewer than a dozen Lower Mainland municipalities have bylaws that require scrap dealers to maintain records of copper and other high -value metals they purchase, and to share details daily with local police. Variations in bylaws and enforcement have failed to curb the problem, and municipalities and utilities have called for a consistent, provincial approach. The new law is designed to help to deter and prosecute metal thieves, minimize regulatory costs for the recycling industry and protect the personal information of those who sell metal to scrap dealers. Under it: • Those who deal in high -value metals like copper, which are targets for metal thieves, will be required to record details including the weight and type of metal purchased, any distinguishing marks on it, and where the seller says he or she got it. • Dealers will share these details with local police on a daily basis and must keep their records for a minimum of one year. • Dealers will also record each seller's personal information, including their full name, current address, telephone number and date of birth, as well as vehicle or pick-up address details. • To protect sellers' privacy, dealers will assign a unique code to each customer from whom they buy metal. This code will accompany purchase information supplied to the police. Dealers will only release a seller's personal information to police who present a court order for that information. • The law will prohibit dealers from buying regulated scrap metal from any seller unable or unwilling to provide required information. The proposed legislation avoids the financial and administrative burden of licensing, but will create a dealer registry and a system of compliance and enforcement by appointed inspectors. More specific details — including the types of metal to be regulated, and the penalties for failing to comply with the law — will follow when the Province develops complementary regulations. Quotes: Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General Shirley Bond — "This law is critical to protecting infrastructure across B.C. —those critical communications links between our homes and 911 emergency services, and between first responders themselves. Our approach will ensure metal thieves don't profit from their crimes, while minimizing the cost and administrative burden for the law-abiding workers in our scrap and recycling sector." Kenneth Haertling, TELUS vice-president and chief security officer — "We welcome this tough approach to regulating scrap metal. sales throughout B.C., which will help protect our customers' access to critical communications infrastructure. Thieves have cut live TELUS.cables 325 times this year — and when they do so, they are cutting our customers' access to 911, putting their very lives at risk. It needs to stop, and this legislation will help." Mike Chadwick, Chief Constable, Saanich Police Department — "Law enforcement is supportive of this initiative because of the obvious benefits to public safety. Each year, metal thefts put first responders and the public at serious risk as a result of destruction of critical infrastructure such as telephone lines and hydro installations." Quick Facts: • Metal theft frequently causes widespread phone service disruption. Last December, more than 500 Maple Ridge residents lost 911 emergency service after thieves stole copper telephone wire. • THUS has estimated each of the 200 metal theft incidents it dealt with in the Lower Mainland last year cost $50,000 on average to repair. • About 10 Lower Mainland municipalities currently have metal theft bylaws. Contact: Government Communications and Public Engagement Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General 250 356-6961 Connect with the Province of B.C. at: www.gov.bc.ca1connect w Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 7, 2011 and Members of Council FILE NO: E01-035-001 Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request has been received from the Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society to use municipal streets for the annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park on Saturday December 3, 2011. Authorization from Council is requested to allow the event to occur in Maple Ridge. Iilk] 00luIkv,121►1J_11NI011 THAT use of municipal streets be authorized for the annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park on Saturday December 3, 2011, provided the conditions outlined in Schedule 'A' attached to the staff report dated November 7, 2011 are met. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society is requesting permission to use municipal streets on Saturday December 3, 2011 for their annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park. The Christmas Festival events will be held in Memorial Peace Park from 4:00 pm to 8:00 pm. The Parade is scheduled from 6:00 pm to 7:30 pm. The parade route begins on 222 Street at Church Avenue, travels south to Dewdney Trunk Road, east to 224 Street, south on 224 Street to Lougheed Highway, west to 223 Street, north on 223 Street, ending at the lane south of Selkirk Avenue. These events require the following road closures: Brown Avenue from Garden Street to 222 Street (4:00-8:30 pm) 222 Street from Church Avenue to Dewdney Trunk Road (5:30-7:30 pm) ■ Dewdney Trunk Road from 222 Street to 224 Street (5:30-8:30 pm) s Fraser Street from Dewdney Trunk Road to McIntosh Avenue (4:00-8:30 pm) ■ 224 Street from Dewdney Trunk Road to Lougheed Highway (5:30-8:30 pm) o Lougheed Highway from 224 Street to 223 Street (5:30-8:30 pm) r 223 Street from Lougheed Highway to Selkirk Avenue (5:30-8:30 pm) A Rolling Road Closure (RCMP/safety vehicle at front and back of float along route) to permit transporting the Christmas Festival float from it's set up area to the official start of the parade is requested at 6:30 pm for approximately 5 minutes. The Rolling Road Closure would be from Mussallem's parking lot, north on 223 Street, west on Selkirk Avenue and north on 222 Street to Dewdney Trunk Road where the float will join the parade route, 1112 b) c) EE e) f) It is anticipated that all the streets will be restored by 9:00 pm. A map showing the location is attached. Strategic Plan: Permitting of Maple Ridge street events promotes community development and often highlights Maple Ridge's natural and built features. Citizen/Customer Implications: Permission to use municipal streets may cause some delays and inconveniences to other road users. However, traffic control will be provided by the event organizers. In addition, the organizers will be distributing an information letter to affected businesses and residents. Interdepartmental Implications: The road use permit establishes that the event organizer must obtain the approval of RCMP and Fire Department for traffic control and management and must notify BC Ambulance Services as well as Coordinate with Coast Mountain Bus Company (transit service) on any rerouting requirements. Business Plan Implications: The Business Plan recognizes that the District processes requests for use of municipal streets as part of its services. The financial impact of the specific road use is limited to staff processing effort. Policy Implications: Permission to use municipal streets is grantable under the District's policy practices. g) Alternatives: The District could refuse to permit the event to occur. In this event, the organizer would have to cancel the event. CONCLUSIONS: From time to time, the District is requested to allow the use of municipal streets for various events and activities. Permission is requested for the annual Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park and conditions of Schedule `A' are attached. Prepared by: Michaej/E�t AScT. Approved by: / Frank Quinn MBX PEng. j : Publ' Works & development Services Concurrence: J L. (Jim) Rule hief Administrative Officer Schedule 'A' To Council Memorandum Dated November 7, 2011 Santa Claus Parade and Christmas Festival in the Park Conditions of Approval Approval for the event is given on condition that the organizers: I. provide all necessary traffic controls, parking and emergency access acceptable to the RCMP, Fire Department and the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge (the District); 2. notify local Ambulance Services of the event; 3. make arrangements with Coast Mountain Bus Company for any required rerouting of buses; 4. advertise the event in a local newspaper and notify all surrounding businesses and residents of the event (a minimum of one week prior to the event date); 5. notify surrounding businesses of pending road closures, by letter provided by the District of Maple Ridge on behalf of the organizer; 6. must maintain access for emergency services to the effected areas at all times; 7. hold and save harmless the District from and against all claims, and damages arising out of or in any way connected with the event; 8. obtain any required permits from the Maple Ridge Parks & Leisure Services Department for park facility use if required; and 9. obtain and maintain during the term of this event a comprehensive general liability insurance policy providing coverage of not less than $5,000,000.00, naming the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge as an additional named insured and MUST have the following statement written in the policy: "Naming the District as an additional insured and providing that the said policy shall not be cancelled, lapsed or materially altered without 30 days notice in writing to the District." Policies without this statement or an altered statement will NOT be accepted. The policy shall also include a Cross Liability Clause. A copy of such policy shall be delivered to the Corporate Officer prior to the event; and 10. refurbish all municipal infrastructure to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior to the event, all within 24 hours of the completed event, to the satisfaction of the District. The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge reserves the right to withdraw permission to use municipal streets for this and future events should the organizers fail to comply with the above requirements. Chief Administrative Officer MAPLE RIDGE CHRISTMAS FESTIVAL SOCIETY 11925 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC. V2X 6G2 C/o Festivals office: Phone 604-467-7325(1) Fax: 604-467-7373 .. www.manleridaechristmas.ca Sergeant Pierschke, Ridge -Meadows Municipal Traffic Maple Ridge BC V2X 6A9 October 10, 2011 This letter is to notify you that the Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society will be hosting the annual Santa Claus Parade on Saturday December 3, 2011. 1 have included a map with this letter for your approval in order to proceed to the engineering department. Road closures for the parade route require barricades in the core area. The following streets will be closed from 2:00pm to 8:30pm. Fraser Street at Haney Place in Memorial Peace Park. Haney Place, including underground parking access to and from Memorial Peace Park is also closed from 2:00pm to 8:30pm. Brown Ave between 222nd and Garden Street from 4:00pm to 8:30pm for marshalling. 222nd Avenue between Dewdney Trunk Rd & Church St will be closed from 5:30pm to 7:30pm Dewdney Trunk Rd will be closed from 5:30pm to 8:30pm between 222nd and 224th street. All East — West Lanes between Dewdney Trunk Rd & Lougheed Hwy will be closed at 224tt' MI , from 5:30pm to 8:30pm. 224th Street between Dewdney Trunk Rd and Lougheed Hwy will be closed from 5:30pm to 8:30pm. Lougheed Hwy between 224th and 22Yd will be closed from 5:30pm to 8:30pm. 223rd Street between Lougheed & Selkirk will be closed from 5:30pm to 8:30pm. There will be no parking along Brown Ave between 222nd & Garden St between 4:00pm and 7:00pm There will be no parking along 222nd Street between Church Ave & Dewdney Trunk Rd, 5:30pm to 7:30pm. There will be no parking along Dewdney Trunk Rd between 222nd & 224th Ave, from 5:30pm to 7:30pm. There will be no parking along 224th Street between Dewdne� Trunk Rd &Lougheed Hwy between 5:30pm and 7:30 as well as on Lougheed Hwy between 224th & 223r from 5:30 to 8:30pm. As in the past all street re -openings are approximate and may be open sooner as the parade completes. We apologize for any inconvenience this road closure may cause, and thank you for your co-operation. If you have any questions please contact Art Solomon at 604-219-9027. Sincerely Art Solomon Chair Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society Michelle Islet From: Darlene Slevin Sent: October-26-11 11:50 AM To: Ruby Tam; Michelle Isley Cc: Michael Eng Subject: RE: Amendment to Santa Parade Road Closure Request HI Ruby; Thanks for the phone call — the Rolling Road Closure will take place close to 6:30 pm, lasting for approximately 5 minutes. Thank you, Darlene Slevin Special Events Assistant Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Phone: 604-467-7325 (1) Fax: 604-467-7373 www.mapleridge.ca www. oittmeadows. bc.ca www.m volunteer ase.com From: Ruby Tam Sent: October-26-11 11:39 AM To: Michelle Isley Cc: Darlene Slevin; Michael Eng Subject: FW: Amendment to Santa Parade Road Closure Request Hi Michelle, As I have mentioned, please refer to the email below for the additional request/revision. Thanks very much for your help. Ruby Tam Traffic Technician/Safer City Coordinator Engineering Department District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Tel: (604)467-7465 Fax: (604)467-7425 www.mapleridge.ca Deep Roots Greater Heights From: Darlene Slevin Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:11 AM To: Ruby Tam Subject: Amendment to Santa Parade Road Closure Request Hi Ruby; Clarification: • The road closure request on Lougheed Highway is from 5:30 pm to 8:30 pm, from 224th Street to 223rd Street. Amendment: • To best meet ICBC requirements, Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society requests permission for a Rolling Road Closure (RCMP/Safety vehicle at front and back of float along route) to be included in parade route request to permit transport of the Christmas Festival float from it's set up area to the official start of the parade. The rolling closure would be from Mussallem's parking lot, north on 223rd street, west on Selkirk, north on 222"d Street to Dewdney Trunk Road where the float will join the parade route. Thank you for your assistance, Ruby, and for the chance to provide clarification. The Christmas Festival Society is very appreciative of the support provided by Engineering, RCMP and the Fire Department. Thank you, Darlene Slevin Special Events Assistant Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Phone: 604-467-7325 (1) Fax: 604-467-7373 www.manleridge.ca www, ittmeadows.bc.ca www.m volunteer a e.com Is qzz 0 Li DI I Meld Is ZZz ai a Q s r i N � r U IS aequna 7S W O m C Y R a R 2 SS zzz 7 Q Y Y d Is W S G W w s O d a' 0 z 'IS HJQA Ruby Tam From: Timo Juurakko Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 9:49 AM To: Ruby Tam Cc: Darlene Slevin; Mark Smitton Subject: FW: 2011 Santa Parade Attachments: 2011 Parade route map.pdf.pptx; 2011 street closure req.doc; Detour directions.doc Hi Ruby - as per our earlier discussions with Darlene, the route is approved as presented. The closure of the Ring Road and Fraser Street will require personnel at the barricades as these are still active response routes to any emergency incident at buildings or sites contained in the closed area. Fire Department needs to be at or near the beginning of the parade so that we can leave the parade easily in the event of an emergency call. Timo Juurakko, Assistant Chief Maple Ridge Fire Department 604-476-3051 -----Original Message ----- From: Darlene Slevin Sent: October-18-11 13:32 To: Timo 7uurakko Subject: FW: 2011 Santa Parade Hi Timo; Can you please review and let Ruby know if you approve this route etc? She won't be able to proceed to Council without your feedback. I think you can let her know by email, if that's easier. If you have any questions, just let me know. Thank you, Darlene Slevin Special Events Assistant Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services Phone: 604-467-7325 (1) Fax: 604-467-7373 www.mapleridge.ca www.oittmeadows.bc.ca www.myvolunteerpaee.com -----Original Message ----- From: Darlene Slevin Sent: October-12-11 2:30 PM To: Timo Juurakko; 'Dale SOMERVILLE' Cc: Ruby Tam; Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society Subject: FW: 2011 Santa Parade 1 -----Original Message ----- From: Art Solomonfmailto:Presiden_t@Mapleridgechristmas.caI Sent: October-11-11 8:20 PM To: Roland.Pierschk rcm - rc. c.ca; Mark Smitton Cc: Darlene Slevin Subject: 2011 Santa Parade Good day Sirs, Please review and reply to the attached documents for the annual Santa Claus parade and Christmas in the Park festivities. If you have any questions please contact me 604-219-9027. Thank you, Art Solomon President, Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society 2 Page 1 of 1 Ruby Tam From: Darlene Slevin Sent: October 13, 2011 4:51 PM To: Ruby Tam Cc: Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society Subject: FW: FW: 2011 Santa Parade Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red From: Dale SOMERVILLE [ma !Ito: da le.somervil le@ rcm p-grc.gc.ca] Sent: October-13-11 4:07 PM To: Darlene Slevin Subject: Re: FW: 201.1 Santa Parade RCMP approval, no issues. Cpl. R. Dale Somerville #43014 NCO i/c Ridge Meadows Traffic Section 11990 Haney Place Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X-9B8 office 604 467-7628 cell 604 812-2826 fax 604 467-7633 email dale. somerville2 rcm p-g rc. c.ca >>> Darlene Slevin <dslevin@mapleridge.ca> 2011-10-12 14:29 >>> -----Original Message ----- From: Art Solomon [mailto: President@ mapleridgech ristmas. ca] Sent: October-11-11 8:20 PM To: Roland.Pierschke@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; Mark Smitton Cc: Darlene Slevin Subject: 2011 Santa Parade Good day Sirs, Please review and reply to the attached documents for the annual Santa Claus parade and Christmas in the Park festivities. If you have any questions please contact me 604-219-9027. Thank you, Art Solomon President, Maple Ridge Christmas Festival Society 14/10/2011 Detour Lougheed East Right on Haney by-pass Left on 225 St. up to Lougheed. Detrour Lougheed West Left on 225 St. Right on North Ave to Haney by-pass Right on Haney by-pass Left on Lougheed Detour Dewdney Trunk Road East Left on 216 St. or Dunbar St. Right on 122Id Ave Right on 224 St. Left on 121 st Ave Right on Edge St. Left on Dewdney Trunk Road Detour Dewdney Trunk Road West Right on Edge St. Left on 121 Ave. Right on 224 St. Left on 122 Ave. Left on Dunbar St or 216 St. Right on Lougheed Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Temporary Borrowing Bylaw EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DATE: November 7, 2011 ATTN: Committee of the Whole The financial plan incorporates debt proceeds into the overall funding strategy. Borrowing was approved in 2008 and 2009 to fund a portion of the capital works program. This approval included elector approval and approval of the Inspector of Municipalities. These projects are or will soon be complete and it is desirable to borrow these funds. The money to repay these borrowings has been established and no additional source of funds is required to service this debt. It is also desirable to pass a resolution that no further borrowing is required on a 2004 borrowing bylaw associated with the purchase of the downtown core facilities, to remove the balance of the authorized but unissued debt which was not required. RECOMMENDATION: That Maple Ridge Temporary Borrowing Bylaw No. 6879-2011 be given first, second and third readings. That Council approve the following borrowings from the Municipal Finance Authority of British Columbia as part of the 2012 Spring Borrowing Session and that Metro Vancouver Regional District be requested to consent to our borrowings over the terms noted and include the borrowing in their Security Issuing Bylaw: $2,675,000 as authorized through Maple Ridge River Road Drainage Improvements Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6562-2008 over a 5 year term; $625,000 as authorized through Maple Ridge Animal Shelter Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6560-2008 over a 15 year term; . $1,520,000 as authorized through Maple Ridge Cemetery Expansion Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6559-2008 over a 25 year term; $700,000 as authorized through Maple Ridge Cemetery Expansion Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6679-2009 over a 25 year term. That Council confirms that there will be no further borrowing required against Downtown Core Facilities Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6246-2004 and the remaining unissued loan authorization in the amount of $700,000 will be cancelled. 1131 7 *14M*31615 The financial plan includes borrowing as a strategic funding source for capital projects. Borrowing has been approved for several projects. All of the approved debt has gone through an approval process that included elector approval and Ministry approval. The animal shelter, River Road drainage improvements and a portion of the cemetery expansion are complete and require funding. Debt was also approved for 240 Street Bridge over Kanaka Creek which has been completed but since there are sufficient funds in Development Cost Charges the borrowing has not been initiated. The other two projects that have been approved but are not complete include the construction of Fire Hall #4 which will be underway shortly and the school portion of three school/park sites which requires financial commitments from the School District that we have not been able to attain. The amount of borrowing required for the animal shelter, $625,000 is less than the $900,000 originally anticipated. Both the amount and term of the issue have been reduced. The impact of this is that the debt will be paid back over a 15 year term, 10 years earlier than originally anticipated. Debt was previously approved for the purchase of the downtown core facilities. The amount remaining, $700,000 cannot be used or repurposed as the bylaw narrowly restricted its use. The amount authorized but unused continues to sit on our financial statements as well as the Municipal Finance Authority's (MFA) statements. It is desirable to pass a resolution so that this amount can be removed. The MFA debt issues are AAA rated. They issue twice a year and in the interim have a temporary borrowing facility to meet the funding requirements of their clients. A Municipal Security Issuing Resolution is part of the borrowing process and will be forwarded to Metro Vancouver, the MFA and the Ministry to ensure our funding requirements are included in the 2012 spring borrowings. The proceeds of the debenture issues will be used to pay back the funds issued under the temporary borrowing. Current borrowing rates are at historic lows making this an opportune time to borrow. CONCLUSIONS: The use of debt is thoughtfully considered in contemplating a funding strategy for our Long Term Capital Program. With rates at historic lows it is best to externally borrow for these projects now. A number of projects that were approved for borrowing in 2008 and 2009 have been completed and the borrowing needs to be initiated. Prepared by: Trevor ompson, BBA, CGA Manager of Financial Planning h. P ul Gilt, BBA, CG� Approved by: General Managef Corpor e & Financial Services Concurrence; J.L. (Jim) yule Chief Administrative Officer DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6879-2011 A bylaw to authorize temporary borrowing pending the sale of debentures WHEREAS it is provided by section 181 of the Community Charter that the Council may, where it has adopted a loan authorization bylaw, without further assents or approvals, temporarily borrow money; AND WHEREAS the Council has adopted Bylaw No.6559-2008, cited as Maple Ridge Cemetery Expansion Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6559-2008, authorizing the purchase of property to expand the cemetery, in the amount of one million five hundred and twenty thousand dollars ($1,520,000); AND WHEREAS the Council has adopted Bylaw No.6560-2008, cited as Maple Ridge Animal Shelter Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6560-2008, authorizing the construction of the animal shelter, in the amount of nine hundred thousand dollars ($900,000); AND WHEREAS the Council has adopted Bylaw No.6562-2008, cited as Maple Ridge River Road Drainage Improvements Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6562-2008, authorizing the improvement to drainage on River Road, in the amount of two million six hundred and seventy five thousand dollars ($2,675,000); AND WHEREAS the Council has adopted Bylaw No.6679-2009, cited as Maple Ridge Cemetery Expansion Loan Authorization Bylaw No. 6679-2009, authorizing the purchase of property to expand the cemetery, in the amount of one million eight hundred thousand dollars ($1,800,000); AND WHEREAS the sale of debentures has been temporarily deferred: NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Temporary Borrowing Bylaw No. 6879- 2011". 2. The Council is hereby authorized and empowered to borrow an amount or amounts not exceeding the sum of six million eight hundred and ninety five thousand dollars ($6,895,000), as the same may be required. 3. The form of obligation to be given as acknowledgement of the liability shall be a promissory note or notes bearing the corporate seal and signed by the Mayor and the Financial Officer. 4. The money so borrowed shall be used solely for the purposes set out in said Bylaw No.6559-2008, Bylaw No. 6560-2008, Bylaw No.6562-2008 and Bylaw No. 6679-2009. 5. The proceeds from the sale of the debentures or so much thereof as may be necessary shall be used to repay the money so borrowed. READ a first time the day of 120 . READ a second time the day of 20 . READ a third time the day of 20 . RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM: SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Social Planning Advisory Committee Gaming Revenue Funding Commitment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: MEETING DATE: November 7, 2011 FILE NO: Clerks-0540-20-SPAC-04-Reports MEETING: Committee of the Whole The Social Planning Advisory Committee recognizes the importance of gaming revenue for local community and not for profit organizations. The direct provision of service to citizens is enhanced by revenue received through gaming. Over the last five years, local charities, community organizations and not for profits have not only seen a decrease in gaming funding but they have experienced increased difficulty applying for funding due to the changes in criteria and the application process. This decrease and change in funding criteria has contributed to a decrease in the provision of social services. In 1999, the Province of BC and the BC Association for Charitable Gaming entered into an agreement that would have provided charitable associations with 33% of the total gaming revenue. The original agreement has not been achieved as charitable organizations receive only 10% of this amount. Funding criteria has also changed leaving many non-profit arts and environmental groups specifically without the ability to apply for gaming funding. The Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Katzie Community Network has been following the impact of all funding cuts on local organizations. The loss of revenue and the change in the gaming grant structure has been of particular concern to the Network. The provision of service in the non-profit and social service sectors has been altered due to these funding cuts. Agencies and organizations are being forced to discontinue services notjust because of funding decreases but due to the fact that there is so much uncertainty regarding gaming grants. The Social Planning Advisory Committee recommends that Council send a letter to the province encouraging consideration of the original agreement of 33% and ensure that the funding process is direct and clear. RECOMMENDATION: That Council write a letter to the Minister of Social Development requesting that the Province make a commitment to the BC Association for Charitable Gaming to disperse 33% of gaming revenues to charities in British Columbia; and that direction and communications around funding application and process be clear and transparent. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: For over a century, Canadian religious and charitable organizations have enjoyed a legal exemption from the general prohibition against gambling as long as the revenue was dedicated to charitable or religious purposes. As gambling laws and provincial policies changed, access to Page 1 of 3 1151 gaming revenue also changed. In 1985, provincial governments were given exclusive jurisdiction over lotteries and lottery schemes with an agreement that some funds would be returned back to the federal government. Throughout the latter part of the twentieth century, non -profits and community organizations in most Canadian provinces became increasingly reliant on charitable gaming as a source of revenue. By the end of the twentieth century, gaming had expanded to become a large-scale, provincially operated industry that benefited federal, provincial and municipal governments, non -profits and community organizations. It is also widely acknowledged that the increased acceptance of gaming by individuals and communities is intrinsically linked to the association between gaming and charities. Generally, people accept gaming within their communities because they know that a percentage of the revenue will directly benefit their community. This historic association has contributed to the widespread expansion of gaming centres, casinos, lotteries and lottery schemes in most Canadian Provinces. Provincial governments have primary jurisdiction over gaming in terms of enforcement and dispersal of revenue. Gaming provides a great deal of revenue for the province; the province in turn distributes a percentage of this revenue to community, regional and provincial charitable organizations and non -profits. Additionally, communities with a gaming centre or casino receive a percentage of revenue for municipal coffers. In 1999, the Province of British Columbia and the BC Association of Charitable Gaming entered into an agreement that would have provided Charitable Associations with 33% of the total gaming revenue. The agreed upon percentage has never been fulfilled as charitable organizations receive only 10% of this amount. In 2010, the government announced significant changes to the community gaming structure for 2010/11. Previously, all arts, culture and sports programs were eligible for funding; however, eligibility has changed and is limited to arts and culture programs for youth, fairs, festivals and museums and sports programs for youth or people with disabilities. Gaming funding for environmental programs and school playgrounds was also discontinued in 2010/11. The other significant change was that Direct Access and Bingo Affiliation grants were consolidated. This has impacted the timing of the grants and the subsequent pay out of grant revenues to organizations In 2009/10 the total revenues from commercial gaming in the Province of British Columbia was approximately $2.52 billion dollars. After payouts, the Provincial Government's revenue from gaming was approximately $1.07 billion. Community organizations received $112.6 million of the total revenue with grants being dispersed to approximately 6,700 organizations around the province. Organizations in Maple Ridge have received the following totals in gaming grants: • From 2005/2006 until 2009/2010 between $2.6 and $3.3 million in gaming funding was received annually. • In 2009/10 Maple Ridge organizations received just over $2.87 million in gaming grants. • To date, in 2010/2011, there has been a significant decrease with approximately $1.8 million being paid out to community organizations in Maple Ridge. The provincial government recently announced a $15 million dollar boost in gaming funding to community organizations. The news release states that this "restoration of funding will bring over 500 community organizations back up to historical funding levels". The updated information does not yet appear on the provincial website so it is unclear which organizations in our community have received additional funding. It is also unclear if this funding is considered new funding, bridging funding, or ongoing funding. Page 2 of 3 b) Desired Outcome: That the Mayor and Council write a letter to the Minister of Social Development requesting that the province make a commitment to the BC Association for Charitable Gaming of dispersing 33% of gaming revenues to charities in British Columbia; and that direction and communications around funding application and process be clear and transparent. c) Citizen/Customer Implications: The provision of local services to citizens currently supported by gaming revenue could be enhanced, maintained or restored with the province's agreement to commit to the 33% originally agreed upon in 1999. If there is a continued decrease in gaming revenue service provision by the local social service sector will be impacted negatively and services will be reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Local community organizations and non-profit agencies rely on gaming revenue to provide services to citizens. The decrease in revenue and changes to the application process has impacted their ability to maintain or enhance service to citizens. The BC Association of Charitable Gaming has asked the province to abide by the original agreement of dispersing 33% of gaming revenue to charitable organizations in the province. This commitment would provide community organizations with additional funding to maintain or enhance services to citizens. SPAC has forwarded a recommendation to Council that a letter is sent to the province encouraging consideration of the original agreement of 33% and ensure that the funding process is direct and clear. Prepared by: Shaw tthewson Coordinator: Social Planning and Recreation Concurrence: Sue -Wheeler Community Services Director Approved by: Andrea Walker Chair, Social Planning Advisory Committee SM:ps Page 3of3 r Deep Roots Greater Heights 1163 FROM SUBJECT District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer Street Trees in Silver Valley MEETING DATE: November 7, 2011 FILE NO: CDPR-0640-30 MEETING: Committee of the Whole EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A presentation was made by a resident who was also representing some of his neighbours to the Parks and Leisure Services Commission on September 8, 2011, requesting that the street trees on their street be changed to a smaller growing variety of tree. The resident anticipates that the current planting of Red Oaks will eventually grow to a much greater height and block views of the mountains to the north. It was recommended by the Commission that this item be referred to Maple Ridge Council to discuss the tree selection criteria. RECOMMENDATION: This report is submitted for information only. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Street trees were planted on 137 Avenue in 2010 as per the standard street tree specification from the Planning Department. Following the installation of the trees the Planning Department received a resident request to change the type of tree that had been planted on their street, as the resident had concerns that the tree had the potential to grow to a fairly large size. The Planning Department staff advised the residents that while the street trees were still the responsibility of the Developer (for the first year following installation) that they may wish to discuss with the Developer the possibility to replace the trees with others listed in the municipal approved list of street trees. There would be some cost associated with removing and replacing the trees however the residents indicated that they were prepared to pay the Developer for this work to proceed. Any work by the Developer to replace the trees would need to meet the District of Maple Ridge street tree criteria. In preparing a street tree design the Developer's consultants may select from a municipally approved list that contains different species of trees including oaks, maples, ash, sweet gum, beech, honey locust, linden, pear, cherry, snowbell and several varieties of some of these species (ie various forms of red maple crossed with silver maple, oaks, flowering cherry, and ash). The designers generally select varieties of trees that are commonly available in the local nursery market, as sizes and variety of selections may change based on seasonal demand. 1152 The Planning Department suggested to the residents that working with the Developer was the best opportunity for replacing the trees prior to them becoming established during the warranty period, as once the trees are accepted by the District they become the responsibility of the Parks Department and their removal would not be supported by staff. Previous requests to remove and replace District owned street trees when referred to the Parks and Leisure Services Commission had been denied as the Parks Department removes only trees that have died or are in poor health and showing increased decline. Unfortunately the residents failed to come to an agreement with the Developer and the option of tree replacement while the trees were still under the control of the Developer was not pursued further by the residents. Staff have confirmed the street trees were turned over to the District of Maple Ridge early in 2011 and a request was received by the Parks Department from a resident on 137 Avenue that asked the District of Maple Ridge to replace the trees with a smaller growing variety to minimize any future impact on the residents view. The installed trees conform with the street tree specification and on acceptance from the Developer are healthy without need of maintenance for several years. This red oak variety of tree will grow to a height of 50 feet in optimal growing conditions. Optimal growing conditions would be an open area of native soils with good growing capability. The boulevards along roadways typically do not provide optimal growing conditions. As a result these trees are not expected to achieve the size that a similar tree would growing in a field of good quality native soils. The criteria that is used to design a street tree plan is based primarily on what space is available to support the growth of the tree. Space may be limited by the presence of overhead conductors, or a reduced space at the back of curb or sidewalk on the inside curve of a cul-de-sac, and where a reduced front yard setback (ie 3.0 metres) exists in some compact residential zones. In these situations a tree with a smaller canopy and therefore overall height is typically specified. There are a very few varieties of small trees that are locally available and suitable for street side planting that will maintain a maximum height that does not conflict with overhead services. BC Hydro previously published guidelines that specified trees growing within five metres of overhead conductors shall have maximum mature height of 6.0 metres or less. As there are few trees available to choose from for planting in these situations, an effort is made to insure these smaller trees are only used in these situations. By following this procedure we avoid having our street tree inventory dominated by just a few species. It is important to try and maintain a broad diversity of species used for street trees for a healthy inventory. If an inventory is dominated by one species you are susceptible to greater tree losses if a disease or pest attacks your primary species. To better maintain a broad diversity of species, we limit the use of small growing trees to those planting sites that require small trees due to space restrictions and overhead conductors. The greatest opportunity to plant a wide variety of tree species exists where a grassed boulevard is separated from the private property by a municipal sidewalk. These areas are typically on road rights of way that are 18 or more metres in width. The Silver Valley Plan contained within the Official Community Plan includes a graphic of a road cross section for 18 metre right of way widths. Titled "Local Residential 2 Road" this cross section is provided to describe road classification, standards and maintenance requirements. Roads of this classification are limited in speed, have roadside parking on both sides and may include traffic calming measures. One of the basic community elements identified in the Silver Valley Plan pertains to Roads and Linkages. A key characteristic of this element is to effectively narrow the street with planted boulevards to provide the perception of a narrow street to those driving into the neighbourhood. These characteristics are demonstrated in the Local Residential 2 Road cross section: A principle of transportation and traffic in the Silver Valley Plan is to promote safety in residential neighbourhoods by reducing traffic speed. An effective way to reduce traffic speed is to narrow the appearance of the street with the planting of trees to define the street edge. With larger trees lining the road edge drivers tend to slow down as they perceive a narrower road to negotiate. The street where the complaint originated (137 Avenue) has been constructed to a standard 18 metre road right of way, which includes a grassed boulevard separated from the private property by the municipal sidewalk. In this situation a street tree design would incorporate large growing species of trees as the space to accommodate a larger tree exists, and tall broad trees also contribute to the principle of promoting safety by narrowing the street. Based on these criteria red oaks were specified for installation on 137 Avenue and are appropriate in the opinion of staff. From the street tree planting list there are other varieties of trees that would fit this criteria including several varieties of maple, sweet gum, and tulip trees. These trees will grow to 40,50 or 60 feet (but only in optimal growing conditions). The trees on the street tree list typically grow with a central or dominant leader. This leader provides the natural form of the tree and directs growth to achieve the optimal height. It is not a sound arboricultural practice to cut or top the leader as this has detrimental health impacts on the tree and increases the amount of pruning maintenance that a tree requires over the life of the tree. The Parks Department does receive requests from residents to either remove street trees or exchange the tree for another variety based on the personal preference of the resident. These requests have historically been respectfully denied by Parks staff unless the tree is dead or in severe decline. The objective of the Street Tree Program is to promote a healthy green environment for the benefit of all residents in the community. CONCLUSIONS: Street tree selection criteria is based on the desire, to maintain a diverse street tree inventory by limiting the use of small growing trees to those planting areas restricted by space or overhead wires, to provide large growing street trees where space exists with no overhead obstructions, and to plant large trees to aid ;CW d on wider roads. Prepared by: Bruce McLeod, MBCSLA, ISA Certified Arborist Manager of Parks and Open Space " a Approved by: vid Boag, Director of Parks an cilities Approved by: Chuck Goddard, Manager bf Development and Environmental Services Approved by: �Ily ' its, Geheral Man er, Co tity/Q6 lopm t, Par sand Recreation Concurrence: J.L. �Ji } Rule Chief dministrative Officer hmcl r MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights TO: FROM SUBJECT: District of Maple Ridge His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council Chief Administrative Officer WildPlay Lease Rent Reduction Request MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: November 07, 2011 C.O.W. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Mr. Greg Martin, (Chief Operating Officer) from "WildPlay Maple Ridge", has met with staff from the Strategic Economic Initiatives and Parks and Leisure Services departments to provide an update on the performance of the park to date, and also to request a relaxation of the annual rent for the WildPlay site at 132 Avenue. Wild Play has reported that the revenues generated at this site for the 2010-2011 seasons are 43.4% below the anticipated revenue figures contained in their original proposal submission. WildPlay has also reported a very unusual use pattern for the Maple Ridge Element Park, which sets it apart from all of the other WildPlay locations. Almost 76% of the participants at the Maple Ridge location are children or youth (under 15 years old), and only 24% of the participants are from the older demographic. It is believed that this combined with the current economic climate may be a contributing factor to WildPlay's current revenue challenges. RECOMMENDATION: That the WildPlay Maple Ridge request to reduce the annual rental rate of $32,000 by 50% for a period of 2 years be approved, to permit additional time for WildPlay to become more established in Maple Ridge as a business and to achieve its projected revenues. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The WildPlay Element Park opened in July 2010, which was more than half way through the typical season for this type of attraction. It was acknowledged at the time that this was less than ideal; however it was considered important to move forward with the project rather than postponing it to the following year. The weather conditions in the first half of 2011 have also been very challenging for this type of operation, particularly while they are new to the area, and trying to establish themselves at an outdoor recreation attraction. b) Desired Outcome: WildPlay has invested significant financial resources to make a success of this adventure park in Maple Ridge. The WildPlay Chief Operating Officer believes that with some additional support from the District of Maple Ridge and appropriate cuts in other areas of their operation, that they can survive the current economic situation, and continue to build on the success that it has already achieved in Maple Ridge. 1153 c) Strategic Alignment The WildPlay Element Park was considered to be very desirable by the participants of the community consultation for the "Family Friendly Outdoor Activities" survey conducted in 2009. The WildPlay Park also directly aligns with the District's economic development focus on the growth of its base tourism product offerings. d) Citizen/Customer Implications: If the Maple Ridge WildPlay Element Park is unable to reduce costs in a variety of different areas during this economically uncertain period, they may need to re-evaluate the viability of this operation, which could potentially result in the loss of this recreational amenity in Maple Ridge. In its first year of operation, WildPlay Maple Ridge drew in excess of 14,000 visitors to the facility. Of those, 68% originated from outside of Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows which in turn, generates considerable support of and for the local economy. e) Business Plan/Financial Implications: If the request to reduce the annual rental cost for the license to occupy is approved, the parks budget would temporarily have a minor reduction in its revenue stream. f) Policy Implications: A temporary amendment (addendum) to the License to Occupy agreement would be required. g) Alternatives: This request could be respectfully denied however this is not recommended, as it may affect the long term viability of the investment of both WildPlay and the District of Maple Ridge in this initiative. CONCLUSIONS: Staff recommends that a temporary relaxation of the agreement be approved, as the element park is considered to be valuable addition to the recreational facilities in our community, and also has the ability to attract visitors to our community from the region and outside BC as shown in their visitor analysis (see attached analysis). Prepared by: `-B`av!d Boag Director,,Parks and. Facil Approved by. Kelly Swi T General na er, Ca ity Development, Parks -and ereati7 Concurrence: J.l_Jim) Rule Ch' f Administrative Officer db 4 Pt�y ELEMENT PARKS HEAD OFFICE Unit C - 485 Garbally Rd. Victoria, BC V8T 2J9 Canada September 27th, 2011 District of Maple Ridge 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, BC V2X 6A9 Attn: Dave Boag Letter of Request This letter is to serve as a formal request from the WildPlay Element Park in Maple Ridge for a reduction of our lease cost by $16,000 p.a. effective November 1st 2011, and continuing at this amount until such time as outlined below. Background On July 15t4 2010 WildPlay Maple Ridge opened with great success. And since that opening, the Maple Ridge Park has brought Maple Ridge and our guests to the parks lasting memories. Here are some of the highlights from our first year: - Over 14,000 visitors to the Maple Ridge Park - 68% of BC guests originate from outside Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows, including 10% Surrey; 7% Coquitlam; 7% Vancouver city; 6% Port Coquitlam; 6% Langley; 4% Burnaby - 12% of visitors overall originated from outside British Columbia, with Alberta, Washington and Ontario accounting for more than 1% each, followed by Quebec, California and Manitoba - Charities, non -profits and educational institutions from Maple Ridge that are involved in fitness, environmental and positive community pursuits have utilized WildPlay Maple Ridges' in -kind support giving programs. Recipients have used community activity passes for raffles, silent auctions, recognition, and other fundraising activities. - WildPlay Maple Ridge is actively promoted throughout Western Canada through WildPlay's Network Marketing strategy, including regional brochure placement, advertising in targeted provincial and Canadian travel publications and onboard all BC Ferries major routes. YY��� Play ELEMENT PARKS HEAD OFFICE Unit C - 485 Garbally Rd. Victoria, BC V8T 2J9 Canada - WildPlay Maple Ridge actively works with Tourism Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows, Tourism Vancouver and Tourism BC on regional and provincial tourism with Meeting and Incentive marketing programs including coop and local advertising, media and travel trade activities in addition to site inspections, familiarization trips, and attendance at trade shows and tourism events. - WildPlay Maple Ridge is an active member of the Maple Ridge Chamber and the Fraser Valley Meeting Planner's association Our Future Goals in Maple Ridge Our first year has seen a promising start and our guests to the Maple Ridge Park have provided economic benefit to the District of Maple Ridge. And for WildPlay Maple Ridge the revenues generated during this time were below our original projected targets by approximately 50%. This trending could be attributed to a number of economic factors beyond anyone's - control, but moving forward WildPlay Maple Ridge is committed to its success and to the increasing the economic development of the District of Maple Ridge. And as such the WildPlay Maple Ridge Park is seeking for the District of Maple Ridge to reduce our original lease costs by $16,000, which is in line with the current 50% shortfall in attendance projections. This reduced amount correlates with, and is more aligned with the true revenues generated at the Maple Ridge Park WildPlay Maple Ridge would like to respectfully request to the District of Maple Ridge that the lease costs are set to $16,000 annually beginning November 1st 2011 and continue at this amount for a period of two years, unless we achieve the projected revenues that were originally proposed prior to opening the park, which were used to justify the original lease amounts. WildPlay Maple Ridge will provide and on a regular basis will review our financials with the appropriate staff at the District of Maple Ridge. Thank you for your kind consideration in supporting the future of WildPlay Maple Ridge. Regards, Greg Martin WildPlay Ltd. Chief Operating Officer Wit& play ELEMENT PARKS WildPlay Maple Ridge Guest Statistics July 151h 2010 — July 141h 201.1 The following data is based on a combination of the 'customer details by activity' (for guest origin data) report and the 'All bookings report' (for the age breakdown information). As with the previous report it is also useful to note that we do not know why these guests came to Maple Ridge (to visit the park or for multiple other reasons) and it would be useful to compare these results to general Maple Ridge City tourism data. The data is also not as accurate as with the waiver data of the previous report as human error has caused misspellings, duplicate origins, data simply not being recorded and other general inaccuracies. 1. Guest Origins — Top Seven Provinces/States. The majority of WildPlay Maple Ridge's guests again came from B.C, followed by Alberta, Washington State and Ontario. There were also guests from Quebec, Manitoba, Northwest Territories, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan in Canada and California, Hawaii, Indiana, Texas, Virginia, Arizona, Alabama, Missouri, Tennessee, Colorado, Wyoming, New York, New Jersey Nevada, Kansas and L.A in the U.S.A. 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 9 5fl 36 20 12 ^_. 2. Guest Countries of Origin. The majority (98%) of WildPlay Maple Ridge's guests are from Canada: 14380 guests. The second highest number came from the USA with 151 guests (1%). WildPlay also increased guest numbers from further afield as below. • Canada (98%) ■ UK (5 guests) Germany (3 guests) ■ France (3 guests) i Austria (3 guests) Switzerland (2 guests) H South Korea (1 guest) To i Japan (1 guest) USA (1.04% 151 guests) 1 __. , ............ _....... _....... 3. Guest Origins By Province. The vast majority of WildPlay Maple Ridge's guests were from B.0 at 88% with Alberta coming in second place with 123 guests. * B.0 (88.04%) ■ Alberta (0.85%) Ontario (0.35%) • Quebec (0.25%) Saskatchewen (0.09%) Manitoba (0.08%) Nova Scotia (0.01%) Northwest Territories (0.01%) 4. Guest Origins by BC Regional Districts Metro Vancouver (80.04%) 6 Other (10.88%) Fraser Valley (9.08%) 5. Guest Origins — BC Cities. The majority of Wild Play Maple Ridge's guests came from Maple Ridge- 3578 in total, with the majority of the rest of the guests coming from the very close surrounding cities (as expected). WP MR saw only 70 guests from Vancouver Island (43 Victoria, 16 from Nanaimo, 6 Campbell River, 5 Ladysmith). 273 270 • Maple Ridge (28.12%) ■ Surrey (10.49%) Coquitlam (7.33%) ■ Vancouver (7.09%) Port Coquitlam (6.15%) ra Langley (6.12%) 12 Burnaby (4.05%) 8 Mission (3.66%) Pitt Meadows (3.65%) 8 Abbotsford (3.25% North Vancouver (2.77%) Delta (2.15%) 6. Outside of BC, the most prevalent other Canadian cities were Calgary (66 people), Edmonton (58) and Toronto (25) 7. The most guests seen from the US states were seen from California (20) Texas (6), then Hawaii, Indiana and Virginia (each with 4 people) ............... 1.79% 1.79% 1.79% 1.79% maw_ 3. 3.57 3.57% ■ california ■ texas hawaii i ■ indiana Virginia Colarado • arizona I • alabama . misouri ■ tennessee 45 new york 8. Age distribution of guests Just under 76% of Wild Play MR's guests were kids or young teens (those 15 and under) with only 24% coming from older demographics.