HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-06-12 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfPage 1
District of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
June 12,2012
7:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
Note: This Agenda is also posted on the Municipal Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws
or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or
resolution.
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 MOMENT OF REFLECTION
300 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS
400 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
500 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
501 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of May 22,2012
502 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of May 28,
2012
MEETING DECORUM
Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are
decided at Council meetings which affect many people’s lives. Therefore, we ask that
you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary
and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council
Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person’s behavior will be
reprimanded.
Council Meeting Agenda
June 12, 2012
Council Chamber
Page 2 of 7
600 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
601 Maple Ridge-Pit Meadows Bicycle Advisory Committee Update
Alex Pope, Chair
602 Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows Municipal Advisory Committee for Accessibility
Issues Update
Manfred Wuensche, Chair
Kevin Priebe, Vice-Chair
700 DELEGATIONS
701 SAM (Sales and Marketing)Award
Award for Portrait Homes Subdivision Developments in Silver Ridge
Rob Grimm, Portrait Homes
702 Our Neighbourhoods Group
To address development and the impact that it is having on the two main
growth centres of Albion and Silver Valley
Craig Ruthven
702 Metro Vancouver Feast of Fields
A gourmet wandering harvest festival -FarmFolkCityFolk’s annual
fundraising event to be held at the 2012 Host Farm of Golden Ears
Cheesecrafters
Dana Reinhardt, Metro Vancouver Feast of Fields Coordinator
800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Forwarded from the June 4, 2012 Committee of the Whole Meeting
801 SmartCentres –Albion Flats Proposal
Discussion of proposal presented by SmartCentres and consideration of a
resolution to direct staff to enter into discussions with SmartCentres
900 CORRESPONDENCE
Council Meeting Agenda
June 12, 2012
Council Chamber
Page 3 of 7
1000 BYLAWS
Bylaws for Final Reading
1001 RZ/075/10, 10455, 10469 and 10481 245B Street
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6762-2010
To rezone from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-1b (One
Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to allow for subdivision into 11
single family lots
Final reading
COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
1100 Minutes –June 4, 2012
Public Works and Development Services
1101 2012-049-RZ, 12420 269 Street, A-2 to RS-2
Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6930-2012 to permit the subdivision of single family
residential lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide further
information as described on Schedules B, F and G of the Development
Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with information required for a
Subdivision application.
1102 2012-052-RZ, Text Amendment to CS-1 Zone
Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6931-2012 to permit the operation of a music store in
the town centre be given first reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with
the recommendations being brought to this meeting for Municipal Council consideration
and final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held
in the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting.
Council Meeting Agenda
June 12, 2012
Council Chamber
Page 4 of 7
1103 2011-015-RZ, 11959 203 Street, CS-1 to C-2
Staff report dated June 4,2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6933-2012 to permit apartment use be given first and
second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6801-2011 to permit construction of a two-
storey commercial and residential building be given second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing.
1104 2011-082-RZ, 10150 and 10190 Jackson Road, RS-3 and M-2 to R-1 and
RS-1b
Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012 to designate land use
from Low/Medium Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and
Conservation in the Albion Area plan be given first and second reading and
be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw
No. 6861-2011 to permit future subdivision into approximately 45 single
family lots be given second reading.
1105 RZ/024/09, 25467 Bosonworth Avenue, RS-3 to RS-2
Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6867-2011 to permit a future subdivision of 4 lots be
given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
1106 2012-059-DP, Heritage Alteration Permit, Billy Miner Pub Heritage Site,
22355 River Road
Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal the Heritage Alteration Permit to allow for a
coffee shop/restaurant in the Port Haney Post Office building at property
located at 22355 River Road.
1107 DVP/075/10, 10455 and 10481 245B Street
Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal DVP/075/10 to vary the minimum lot width
for the lots fronting 245 Street.
Council Meeting Agenda
June 12, 2012
Council Chamber
Page 5 of 7
1108 2012-019-DP/DVP, 11378 Kingston Street
Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal 2012-019-DVP to vary setbacks facing 113B
Avenue and Kingston Street and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to
sign and seal 2012-019-DP to permit a proposed multi-tenant industrial
building in the M-3 (Business Park) zone.
1109 Maple Ridge Building Bylaw
Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge Building
Bylaw No. 6925-2012 be given first, second and third readings.
1110 Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) Drinking Water Management Plan
Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that the Greater Vancouver
Water District’s Drinking Water Management Plan be endorsed and that
implementations of the plan be reviewed through the District’s annual
Business Planning process.
1111 Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
Staff report dated June 4, 2012 providing information on the regulatory
framework and water quality monitoring data for 2011.
Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police)
1131
Community Development and Recreation Service
1151 Fees and Charges Bylaw Amendment
Staff report dated June 4, 2012 recommending that Maple Ridge
Recreation Facility Fees Amending Bylaw No. 6932-2012 be given first,
second and third reading.
Council Meeting Agenda
June 12, 2012
Council Chamber
Page 6 of 7
Correspondence
1171
Other Committee Issues
1181
1200 STAFF REPORTS
1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL
From the June 4, 2012 Closed Council Meeting
Medical Marijuana Grow-ops and Dispensaries
1400 MAYOR’S REPORT
1500 COUNCILLORS’ REPORTS
1600 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
1700 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING
1800 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Council Meeting Agenda
June 12, 2012
Council Chamber
Page 7 of 7
1900 ADJOURNMENT
CChheecckkeedd bbyy::________________________________
DDaattee::________________________________
QUESTION PERIOD
The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to
ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of
Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium).
Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual
members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes.
Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the
information required to provide a complete and accurate response.
Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings,
delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to
Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses,workshops and
information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to
have a voice in the future of this community.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk’s Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca.
Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca.
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 12, 2012
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/075/10
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Final Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6762-2010
10455, 10469 and 10481 245B Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Bylaw No.6762-2010 has been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently was
granted Third Reading. The applicant has requested that Final Reading be granted. The purpose of
the rezoning is to permit subdivision into 11 lots not less than 558 m2.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6762-2010 be adopted.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on July 19, 2011. On July 26,
2011 Council granted Third Reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6762-2010 with the
stipulation that the following conditions be addressed:
i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of
the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement;
ii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the
suitability of the site for the proposed development;
iii. Road dedication as required.
The following applies to the above:
1. The applicant has entered into a Rezoning Servicing Agreement and provided the security
as outlined in the Agreement.
2. The applicant has provided a Geotechnical Restrictive Covenant that addresses the
suitability of the site for the proposed development.
3. The applicant has provided the appropriate amount of road dedication on 245 Street.
1001
- 2 -
CONCLUSION:
As the applicant has met Council’s conditions, it is recommended that Final Reading be given to
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6762-2010.
“Original signed by Amelia Bowden”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Amelia Bowden
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
AB /dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6762-2010
Appendix C – Subdivision Plan
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6762-2010
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6762 - 2010."
2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 2 Section 10 and 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 72100
Lot 3 Section 10 and 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 72100
Lot 4 Section 10 and 11 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 72100
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1494 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban
(Medium Density) Residential).
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 26th day of October, A.D. 2010.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 19th day of July, A.D. 2011.
READ a second time the 28th day of June, A.D. 2011.
READ a third time the 26th day of July, A.D. 2011.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 .
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-049-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6930-2012
12420 269 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to RS-
2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit the subdivision of 0.4 hectare (1 acre) single-family
residential lots. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as
outlined below.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6930-2012 be given First Reading; and;
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B, F and G of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 – 1999, along with the information required for a
Subdivision application.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Creus Engineering Ltd.
Owner: 640724 BC Inc
Legal Description: District Lot 7890, Group 1, New Westminster District
OCP:
Existing: Suburban Residential
Zoning:
Existing: A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
Proposed: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Forest (Blue Mountain)
Zone: not applicable (Crown Land)
Designation: Forest
South: Use: Single-Family Residential
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Designation: Suburban Residential
East: Use: Vacant
Zone: A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
Designation: Suburban Residential
1101
- 2 -
West: Use: Single-Family Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Suburban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: Single-Family Residential
Site Area: 65.702 HA. (162 acres)
Access: 269 and 272 Streets
Servicing requirement: Suburban
b) Site Characteristics:
The development site is located within the Whonnock neighbourhood north of Dewdney Trunk Road
on an environmentally complicated site. A preliminary environmental assessment of the subject site
has been prepared by Sartori Environmental Services outlining key environmental features. The
subject site is 162 acres directly south of the Blue Mountain Forest. The property is comprised of
historically logged forest, and is currently forested by conifer forest vegetation on the north portion of
the site and mixed forest vegetation on the south portion of the site. Ri parian vegetation type was
identified along watercourse corridors.
There are a number of watercourses located on the subject site. The main branches of Cooper and
McFadden Creek have been identified by Sartori Environment Services as fish bearing. In addition to
these main branches, five tributaries of the McFadden Creek have also been identified. The subject
site is located on the Blue Mountain Aquifer and adjacent to properties serviced by well water.
c) Project Description:
The applicant proposes to rezone the subject site to permit future subdivision into one acre parcels.
Consideration for environmentally sensitive areas is proposed to be addressed through a
combination of park dedication and habitat protection covenants. The proposed lots will be serviced
by private septic systems and city water. A preliminary subdivision plan has been submitted by the
applicant but more details will need to be provided before a subdivision plan can be found to be
acceptable. Determining an acceptable road concept for this large site will be necessary and
challenging.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need
to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis, particularly
related to watercourse and environmental protection, and a further report will be required prior to
Second Reading. Such assessment will likely impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official
Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further
development permits.
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The subject site is designated Suburban Residential in the Official Community Plan which permits a
single detached housing form located outside of the Urban Area Boundary. The RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) zone is in compliance with this designation, and requires city water and
sewage disposal provided by a private system.
- 3 -
In addition to the above, the following OCP Policies are applicable to this development proposal:
Policy 5-7 Maple Ridge will work in co-operation with Regional, Provincial, and Federal authorities
and plans that contribute to the management and protection of the District’s natural
features, and may include but are not limited to the Fraser River Estuary Management
Plan, Blue Mountain Provincial Forest Recreation Management Strategy, Blaney Bog
Regional Park, the Kanaka Creek Regional Park Management Plan, and the policies
and regulations of the Agricultural Land Commission.
The development proposal will be reviewed in the context of the Blue Mountain Provincial Forest
Recreation Management Strategy.
Policy 5-19 The following should be considered in evaluating development to minimize forest
interface hazards:
a) the siting of development and construction practices that will not contribute to forest
fire risk exposure in forest interface areas;
b) the selection of appropriate building materials and maintenance practices that will
minimize contribution to the spread of fire;
c) the use of landscaping that minimizes contribution to the spread of fire.
A report prepared by a Registered Professional Forester qualified in fire protection engineering using
the NFPA-1144 (Standard for Reducing Structure Ignition Hazards from Wildland Fires) and NFPA-
1141 (Standard for Fire Protection Infrastructure for Land Developments in Suburban and Rural
Areas) guidelines will be required prior to Second Reading.
Policy 5-36 Maple Ridge recognizes the importance of groundwater as a significant source of
drinking water in non-urban areas and will promote the protection, maintenance, and
restoration of groundwater quality outside the urban area.
Policy 5-37 Maple Ridge will require an evaluation of groundwater flows, conducted by a qualified
environmental professional, for new development that is adjacent to areas reliant on
well water. Development proposals that cannot ensure adequate groundwater flows,
sufficient water quality or mitigate potential impacts to existing and surrounding well
water systems will not be supported.
A Groundwater Impact Assessment Report conducted by a registered Professional Engineer or
Geoscientist with specific expertise in hydrogeology will be required prior to Second Reading.
The findings and recommendations of the above mentioned reports will guide further assessment of
the development project and will require the submission of additional applications prior to Second
Reading.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 12420 269 Street from A-2
(Upland Agricultural) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit future subdivision into
single-family lots.
Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance
Permit application.
- 4 -
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development
Permit application is required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top
of bank of all watercourses and wetlands.
Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit
application is required for all development and subdivision activity of all lands with an average
natural slope of greater than 15 percent.
Furthermore, the subject site is located in the proposed Wildfire Development Permit area. Pending
Council approval, this development proposal will be subject to the requirements of the Wildfire
Development Permit. The purpose of this Development Permit is to minimize the risk to property and
people from wildland fires through the use of precautionary measures.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the
applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy
6.20.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a) Engineering Department;
b) Building Department;
c) Operations Department;
d) Fire Department;
e) Parks Department.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements and road patterns has not been undertaken. We
anticipate that this evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading.
f) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as re quired by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 – 1999 as amended:
1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B);
2. Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F);
3. Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G);
4. Subdivision Application.
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
- 5 -
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, therefore, it is
recommended that Council grant First Reading subject to additional information being provided and
assessed prior to Second Reading.
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Amelia Bowden
Planning Technician
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP
Director of Planning
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
AB/dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6930-2012
"Original signed by Amelia Bowden"
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
"Original signed by Frank Quinn"
"Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
Appendix A
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6930-2012
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6930-2012."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
District Lot 7890 Group 1 New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1572 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential).
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 20 .
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 .
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
Appendix B
12395 1235012265
12291
12310
12357
12485
12695
12298 1235912525
12597
12711
12355
12375
12380
12390 12391
12340
12360
12635 12634
12668
12295
12345
12345
12348
12313
12420
12335
12383
12696
12370
12361
12565
12410
12768
12330
12295
12577
12470
12785
12540
12323
12270
12616
12406P 8097
LOT 1
C
LMP 607312
LMP 6073
LMP 6073
10
P 34392
1
P 34392
17
6
10
Rem 9
LMP 10923
17
4
EP 32859
11
14
REM. E 1/2 NW 1/4
7
8 14
31
6
8
9
P 12094
11
5
18
Rem 32
3
10
6
P 34392
BCP 25318
P 34392
1
30
N.E. 1/4
LOT 2
NE 1/4
16
LMP 6073
PARK
P 34391
5
P 34392
BCP 25318
2
E 1/2 NW 1/4
9
P 65913
29
B
A
LMP 6073
11
13
LMP 6073
7
13
P 65913
LMP 6073
26
LMP 15210
P 34391
P 34392
LMP 20049
Rem A
16
12
LMP 17142 LMP 14072LMP 6073
19 LMP 10923Rem 15 7
15
BCP 10209
3
RP 6 591 4
EP 799 30
BCP 25 319
EP 65915LMP 20 050
EP 65916EP 659 16
LMP 10 924
LM P 60 77
LMP 6074LMP 6080
LMP 6070BCP 45 140
LM P 60 77
BCP 25 319
LMP 43 621
EP 659 16 RP 6 591 4EP 65915LMP 6078LMP 10924 BCP 25320BCP 10 210
EP 659 16
LMP 14073
LMP 60 79
B C P 15526LMP 14 073 LMP 10 924 BCP
2
5
3
2
1
McNUTT RD.270 A ST.123 AVE.270 ST.271 ST.269 ST.BLUE MOUNTAIN CR.´
SCALE 1:7,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
6930-20121572
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-052-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6931-2012
Text Amendment to CS-1 Zone
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received for a text amendment to the CS-1 Highway Commercial Zone to
permit the operation of a music store at 22674 Dewdney Trunk Road which is located in the Town
Centre. This application will not require an amendment to the Official Community Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6931-2012 be given First Reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Tom Lee Music Co. Limited
Darry Major
Owner: 294306 BC Ltd
Legal Description: Lot 4, DL 401, Block 1, Plan 12215
OCP:
Existing: Town Centre Commercial
Proposed: No Change
Zoning: Existing: CS-1 Highway Commercial
Proposed: No Change
b) Project Description:
This application for a text amendment to the CS-1 Service Commercial Zone is to permit a music
store in a Town Centre property with CS-1 Service Commercial zoning. (The subject property is at
22674 Dewdney Trunk Road.) Unless specifically referred to as an outright permitted use, all retail
uses in this zone have a minimum retail space of 2000m2. On this basis, the current proposed use
1102
- 2 -
does not meet this minimum area requirement and would not be permitted under current zoning. A
rezoning application to C-3 Town Centre Commercial would be supported at this location. Contained
within the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan, the Town Centre Area Plan designates this site as
Town Centre Commercial which would align with the C-3 Town Centre Commercial Zone.
The applicant prefers to instead proceed with a text amendment to the existing CS-1 Service
Commercial Zone. Both approaches – whether a text amendment to the existing zone or rezoning to
a new one are supportable, as discussed below.,
b) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan :
The location of this proposed use is supportable based on the policies of the Official Community
Plan for the Regional Town Centre. Policy 6-23 states:
All forms of commercial development, including street front retailing, will continue to be
encouraged on appropriate streets in the Regional Town Centre.
The CS-1 Zone is more restrictive, and is intended to accommodate uses oriented to the motoring
public. This Zone aligns with commercial locations outside of the Town Centre. The permitted uses
in this zone reflect a long term concern within the District and the Maple Ridge Official Community
Plan to establish and maintain a “hierarchy” of commercial services, with distinct services available
in the Town Centre, in Neighbourhood Centres, and along the Lougheed Highway and Dewdney
Trunk Road. For this reason, smaller scale retail and personal service uses that are available in the
Town Centre and Neighbourhood centres are not permitted in the CS-1 Zone. However, this text
amendment is supportable as the sale of musical instruments is auto oriented and often requires a
larger showroom that would typically be found in the CS-1 Zone. It should be noted that as the
subject site is zoned CS-1, this proposed text amendment will apply to all CS-1 zoned properties.
This proposal does not generate a need for an amendment to the Official Community Plan.
Zoning Bylaw:
The proposed Text amendment to the Zoning Bylaw is as follows:
Part 7, Commercial Zones, Section 708, Service Commercial: CS-1 is amended as follows:
1) SUBSECTION 1, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, is amended by the deletion of (o) in its entirety
and replacing it with the following:
(o) retail limited to household furnishings, vehicle parts and accessories, second h and
goods, antiques, musical instruments, and sports equipment and accessories, with
other retail uses limited to a minimum 2000 m 2 gross floor area.
2) SUBSECTION 2, PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES, is amended by the addition of the following:
(f) Music lessons w here the principal use is for the retail of musical instruments.
- 3 -
d) Alternatives:
This proposed use for a music store at 22674 Dewdney Trunk Road is supportable based on the
policies within the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan for the Town Centre. The recommended
approach to address the applicant’s business needs is to proceed with a text amendment to the
existing CS-1 Zone. However, Council may wish instead to require that the subject property be
rezoned to C-3 Town Centre Commercial, to reflect its location within the Town Centre and align with
the provisions of the Area Plan..
CONCLUSION:
Based on the considerations outlined in this report, dated June 4, 2012, it is recommended that this
proposed text amendment to the CS-1 Zone be adopted. The goal with this amendment is to meet
the applicant’s business needs without eroding the intent of the Service Commercial Zone to pertain
to larger format retail, automotive services, and other uses associated with a motoring customer
base.
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Diana Hall
Planner
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP
Director of Planning
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Zone Amending Bylaw 6931-2012
"Original signed by Frank Quinn"
"Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
"Original signed by Diana Hall"
Appendix A
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO.6931-2012
A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6931-2012."
2. Part 7, Commercial Zones, Section 708, Service Commercial: CS-1
SUBSECTION 1, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, is amended by the deletion of (o) in it
entirety and replacing it with the following:
(o) retail limited to household furnishings, vehicle parts and accessories, second
hand goods, antiques, musical instruments and accessories, and sports
equipment and accessories, with other retail uses limited to a minimum
2000m2 gross floor area.
SUBSECTION 2, PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES, is amended by the addition of the
following:
f) Music lessons, where the principal use is for the retail of musical instruments.
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended is hereby amended
accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 .
_____________________________ ____________________________
MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
Appendix B
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-015-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6933 – 2012
Second Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6801 – 2011
11959 203 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from CS-1 (Service Commercial) to
C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit construction of a two storey commercial and residential
building. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6933 - 2012 be given First and Second Reading
and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and
2. That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6801 - 2011 be given Second Reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing; and
3. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final R eading.
i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure ;
ii. A Statutory Right-of-Way plan and agreement must be registered at the Land Title
Office for storm sewer;
iii. A Reciprocal Cross Access plan and agreement must be registered at the Land Title
Office;
iv. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising
whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is
evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in
accordance with the regulations;
v. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking;
1103
- 2 -
vi. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Resident Parking ;
vii. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant securing four (4) parking spots on the adjacent
property; and
viii. Registration of a Housing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant to ensure residenti al
units remain as rental units.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Roger Kocheff
Owner: MICA Properties Ltd
Legal Description: Lot 2, D.L. 222, GP 1, NWD Plan BCP16317
OCP:
Existing: Commercial
Zoning:
Existing: CS-1 (Service Commercial)
Proposed: C-2 (Community Commercial)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Commercial
Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial)
Designation: Commercial
South: Use: Vacant
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Commercial
East: Use: Commercial
Zone: C-2 (Community Commercial)
Designation: Commercial
West: Use: Industrial
Zone: M-1 (Service Industrial)
Designation: Commercial
Existing Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: 2 Storey Commercial/Residential building
Site Area: 910 m²
Access: 203 Street
Servicing requirement: Urban
- 3 -
b) Project Description:
The project consists of a two-storey mixed use commercial and residential building. The proposed
development will contain three commercial units on the ground floor and six residential units on the
second floor. The site would share vehicular access from the adjacent property to the north and
parking spaces would be provided at the rear of the building.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan :
The subject site is designated Commercial on Schedule B of the Official Community Plan (OCP) and
the proposed development is in compliance with this designation. Specifically, the subject site is
identified as General Commercial due to its location west of 207 Street in the vicinity of the
intersections between Dewdney Trunk Road and Lougheed Highway as identified in Policy 6-23 of
the OCP.
Zoning Bylaw:
The application proposes to rezone the property located at 11959 203 Street
from CS-1 (Service Commercial) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit a two-storey mixed use
commercial and residential building.
A Development Variance Permit is required to permit a second storey that is greater than 50% of the
ground floor. This variance is justified as the six proposed residential units will be rental units and
the applicant will enter into a Housing Agreement that will be registered on title. As a result, a site
specific text amendment is also required to allow for apartment as a principal use in the C -2 zone on
the subject site only.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.5 of the Official Community Plan, a Commercial Development Permit
application is required to address the current proposal’s compatibility with adjacent development,
and to enhance the unique character of the community.
Advisory Design Panel :
The Advisory Design Panel reviewed the form and character of the proposed commercial and
residential development and the landscaping plans at a meeting held December 13, 2011.
Following presentations by the project Architect and Landscape Architect, the Advisory Design Panel
made the following resolution:
That the following concerns be addressed, and that digital versions of revised drawings and a memo
be submitted to Planning staff; and further that Planning staff forward this on to the Advisory Design
Panel for information.
Consider adding trim and joint details on the stucco walls
- 4 -
Alignment size of windows at residential levels to suit function and look at the
fenestration of the openings
Clarify exit path to north drive isle from west residential exit and reconsider
relocation of exit door to west elevation
Consider deletion of up-stand at punched opening adjacent to small car
parking space at grid A4
Indicate rough ins for CRU washrooms
Clarify sign ban for corner unit
Relocate bike rack closer to east property line to allow pedestrian circulation in
front of corner unit
Identify residential entrance indicate interphone and mailboxes residential
entry to have distinct entrance from commercial units
Consider changing the residential door so it doesn’t match the commercial
doors
Consider shifting the northeast bay one module to west to accentuate corner
element
Consider street trees
Consider the addition of balconies to the west elevations residential units
Consider a cap or cornice detail at stucco walls
Consider wrapping the canopy around the northeast corner
Coordinate the location of gas meter
The applicant has addressed the ADP resolution and revised drawings have been circulated to panel
members for comment. The building’s form and character will be the subject of a future Commercial
Development Permit report to Council.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed development and has advised that all
required services exist for the project. As a result, a Rezoning Servicing Agreement will not be
necessary. Additionally, the Engineering Department has determined that the existing storm
easement must be revised to accurately show the location of the services to allow for the building to
be located as proposed.
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the development is completed
they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated
that there will be an additional two trees. The Manager of Park Planning and Development has
advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget
requirements by $50.00.
- 5 -
Fire Department:
The Fire Department has reviewed the proposed development and has outlined a number of
standard considerations to be made at the Building Permit stage, including fire connection specifics
and address visibility requirements.
e) Environmental Implications:
The applicant has provided an arborist report for the small amount of trees on and within five
metres the subject site. The existing tree stand will be removed and will be compensated by hedge
planting along the garbage and recycling enclosure.
CONCLUSION:
As the proposed development is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, it is recommended
that First and Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6933 – 2012 and
forwarded to Public Hearing; and further that Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6801 - 2011 and forwarded to Public Hearing.
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Amelia Bowden
Planning Technician
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP
Director of Planning
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
AB /dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6801 – 2011
Appendix C – Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw 6933 - 2012
Appendix D– Site Plan
Appendix E – Building Elevation Plans
Appendix F– Landscape Plans
"Original signed by Amelia Bowden"
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
"Original signed by Frank Quinn"
"Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
Appendix A
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6801 - 2011
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6801 - 2011."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 2 District Lot 222 New Westminster District Plan BCP16317
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1512 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to C-2 (Community Commercial).
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 26th day of April, A.D. 2011.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 .
APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 .
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
Appendix B
202852028411927/35 203182033720370202452032111959
12025
202792030611957 203982043611941
11961
11985 203702039020399203042031920325203952029920290119 AVE.
DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD
203 ST.P 62569
Rem Pcl ONE
RP 8346
Pcl. 1
7BCP 16317Rem M
LMP 33673
LMP 33673
LMP 34007
C
2
B A
B
RP 7774
RW 43436
1
BCP 30389
1
P 61704
1
L
LMP 34007
D
EP 11127
Rem 1
C
LMP 33673A
LMP 34007
68
P 48586
P 77583
2
74
8P 12828DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD
203 ST.LOUGHEED HWY.
´
SCALE 1:2,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No.Map No. From:
To:
6801-20111512CS-1 (Service Commercial)
C-2 (Community Commercial)
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6933-2012
A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6933-2012."
2. PART 7, COMMERCIAL ZONES, SECTION 702, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL: C-2 is
amended as follows:
i. SECTION 1, PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, is amended by the addition of the following:
o) Apartment is permitted in the following location:
11959 203 Street
ii. SECTION 8, OTHER REGULATIONS, SUBSECTION (a) is amended by deleting the
first sentence in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
a) A principal or accessory apartment use shall:
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended is hereby amended
accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , A.D. 200 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 200 .
APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation and Highways this day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 200 .
_____________________________ ____________________________
MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
Appendix C
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-082-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading and Second Reading
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012; and;
Second Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6861-2011
10150 and 10190 Jackson Road
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject lands from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) and M-2 (General Industrial) to R-1 (Residential District) and RS-1b (One Family Urban
(Medium Density) Residential) to permit future subdivision into single-family lots.
This application requires an amendment to the Official Community Plan to re-designate the land use
from Low/Medium Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and Conservation in the
Albion Area Plan. On November 8, 2011, Council gave First Reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No.
6861-2011 to rezone this property to R-1 (Residential District) and RS-1b (One Family Urban
(Medium Density) Residential), and considered the early consultation requirements for the OCP
amendment.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and
on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Maple Ridge Official Community
Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012 on the municipal website and requiring tha t the
applicant host a Development Information Meeting, and Council considers it unne cessary to
provide any further consultation opportuniti es, except by way of holding a Public H earing on
the bylaw;
2. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012 be considered in
conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
3. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-
2012 is consistent with the Capital Expenditu re Plan and Waste Management Plan;
4. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012 be given First
and Second Readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
1104
- 2 -
5. That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6861-2011 be given Second Reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing; and ,
6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final R eading:
i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure ;
ii. Amendment to Schedule "A " & “C” of the Official Community Plan;
iii. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the
suitability of the site for the proposed development;
iv. Road and park dedication as required;
v. Consolidation of the development site;
vi. Purchase of the eastern portion of Lot B of BCP 46878 (10190 Jackson Road ) and
consolidation of western portion with Jackson Farm Park; and,
vii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising
whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If th ere is
evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in
accordance with the regulations.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Damax Consultants Ltd
Owners: Seyem’ Qwantlen Land Development Ltd
District of Maple Ridge
Legal Descriptions: Lot: A, Section: 3, Township: 12,NWD Plan: EPP9830
Lot: B, Section: 3, Township 12, NWD Plan: BCP46878
OCP:
Existing: Low/Medium Density Residential, Medium Density Residential
Proposed: Medium Density Residential, Conservation
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), M-2 (General Industrial)
Proposed: R-1 (Residential District), RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium
Density) Residential)
- 3 -
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Park
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), M-2 (General
Industrial)
Designation: Conservation
South: Use: Vacant
Zone: R-1 (Residential District)
Designation: Urban Residential
East: Use: Vacant
Zone: R-1 (Residential District), RS-1b (One Family Urban
(Medium Density) Residential
Designation: Urban Residential
West: Use: Park
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), M-2 (General
Industrial)
Designation: Agricultural
Existing Use of Property: Sand and Gravel (Vacant and Improved), Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 4.12 hectares (10.3 acres)
Access: Jackson Road
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
b) Project Description:
The applicant proposes to rezone the subject site, a former sand and gravel pit, to allow for future
subdivision into approximately 45 R-1 (Residential District) lots. A very small portion of the north
east corner of the site will be zoned RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to be
eventually consolidated with an RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) lot further
east. Approximately 1.46 hectares (3.6 acres) of steep sloping land will be dedicated as park, which
will include a lookout area and a multipurpose trail connecting to existing trails to the north of the
subject site. Portions of the site are proposed to be filled with soil acquired from the re-grading of
lands to the east. It will be necessary for the applicant to purchase the eastern portion of municipal
property located at 10190 Jackson Road in order to proceed with this development application.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan :
The subject site is located in the Albion Area Plan. Approximately 75% of the site is designated
Low/Medium Density Residential, while the remainder is designated Medium Density Residential.
Both these Official Community Plan designations permit single detached housing forms located in
the Albion Area. The R-1 (Residential District) zone is in compliance with the Medium Density
Residential designation, but the Low/Medium Density Residential designation would typically allow
- 4 -
an RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone. The land to the south and east of
the subject site (Upper Jackson Farm) is outside the Albion Area Plan and is designated Urban
Residential. There is an active subdivision application (SD/040/09) on that land for R-1
(Residential District) zoned lots. Therefore, justification has been provided to support an OCP
amendment to re-designate the Low/Medium Density Residential land to Medium Density
Residential on the subject site. The subject site is not located in the North Albion Area and therefore
not involved in the North Albion Review process currently underway.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 10150 and 10190 Jackson
Road from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and M-2 (General Industrial) to R-1 (Residential
District) and RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit future subdivision
into single family homes. All the proposed lots meet the requirements of these zones.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit
application is required for all development and subdivision activity for all lands with an average
natural slope of greater than 15 percent to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and
enhancement of the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous
conditions.
Development Information Meeting :
A Development Information Meeting was held at Thomas Haney Secondary School on April 5, 2012.
A summary of the comments and discussions with the attendees was provided by the applicant and
included the following concerns:
Impact of 248 Street properties’ views;
Pedestrian safety on Jackson Road.
The applicant provided the following in response to the issues raised by the public:
The existing grades on the subject site will be lowered substantially and as a result, will reduce
the impact on views.
Road improvements to increase pedestrian safety are proposed to include a sidewalk on the
east side of Jackson Road and a multi-purpose trail on the west side to connect with the park
to the south. A round-about traffic circle will be constructed at Jackson Road and 102 Avenue
as part of a separate application (SD/040/09).
- 5 -
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed development and has advised that no
servicing works are required with this application and therefore a Rezoning Servicing Agreement will
not be needed. Sanitary and storm sewer construction, as well as watermain and street light
installation on Jackson Road fronting this site, has previously been secured through the Rezoning
Servicing Agreement for development of Upper Jackson Farm under approved application
RZ/040/09. The Engineering Department has further advised that road dedication along the full
length of the development site, including a portion of 10190 Jackson Road, to achieve the 26 metre
road allowance required for an urban arterial, will be necessary for this project.
Parks & Leisure Services Departm ent:
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed
they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated
that there will be an additional 50 trees which is based on one tree per lot; final subdivision design
will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance
requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $1250.00.
Fire Department:
The Fire Department has reviewed the proposed development and has noted that any landscaping
proposed for the lots fronting Jackson Road should not obscure the visibility of addresses now or in
the future to ensure efficient emergency response.
e) School District Comments:
A referral was submitted to School District 42 for comment on the proposed OCP amendment;
however, no comments have been received to date. In past discussions with staff of the School
District, it is clear that Albion Elementary is exceeding capacity. Therefore, an increase to the
number of elementary-aged children as a result of this proposal will likely require those children to
attend a school other than Albion Elementary.
f) Environmental Implications:
The applicant has submitted a Natural Features Development Permit application as the subject site
includes lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent. The requirements of this
Development Permit will be to provide enhancement and replanting works in the areas identified for
park dedication, as well as securities equivalent to 100% of the replanting works and maintenance
for five years.
g) Intergovernmental Issues:
Local Government Act:
An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any
affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section
882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, from land use designation
- 6 -
Low/Medium Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and Conservation is considered to
be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing
procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an
adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial
Governments.
The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste
Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the review of supporting information regarding the proposed rezoning and subdivision
applications, it is recommended that Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending
Bylaw No.6861-2011 and forwarded to Public Hearing; and further that First and Second Reading
be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6928-2012 and be forwarded
to Public Hearing.
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Amelia Bowden
Planning Technician
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP
Director of Planning
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
AB /dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B –Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw 6928-2012
Appendix C – Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6861-2011
Appendix D – Subdivision Plan
Appendix E – Overall Subdivision Plan
"Original signed by Amelia Bowden"
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
"Original signed by Frank Quinn"
"Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6861-2011
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6861-2011."
2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot A Section 3 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP9830
Lot B Section 3 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan BCP46878
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1543 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District), and
RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential).
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 8th day of November, A.D. 2011.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 .
APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of , A.D. 20 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 .
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
Appendix B
24616102501
0
2
6
224665
10040
10303
24632246422465210275
10286
2474024735
2476024765
10268
10295
24725
2479524790 24539246021026510296
10298
10316
10322
10235
10190 24662246611027224673 2469110312
24720
24755
24770247712478510306
2462210309
1025610292 2477510307
24554/7210150246 08246532468510302
247502478010076
10104
10289
10278
10306
2473024745 24752
10125
10295
10180
Re
m S.
1
/
2
OF N.E.
1
/
4
SEC.
3
BCP 20685
A
9
6
1
BCP 23574
121
BCP 46878
A
9
25
1
PARK
LOT A
45 46 1
EPP 9830
PARK
3
8
65
BCP 3463568
PARK
4
69
123
BCP 17387
16
BCP 46878
BCP 43808
BCP 47688
47
BCP 33649
PARK
PARK BCP 46878
3
120
BCP 17387
14 15127
67
PARK
B BBCP 46878
NWP 6502
BCP38265
5
66
2
PARK6 BCP 1738711
12
26
17
Municipal gravel pit
BCP 46878
6
2
Rem N 1/2 of NE 1/4
122
7
5
13
PARK
Municipal gravel pit
63
Provincial gravel pit
64
4
Section 3 Township 12
5
8
10
4
PARK
2
*LMP 5856
BCP 46878
44
43
10
126
7
3
27
BCP 41516
BCP 40804
BCP 41517
LMP 42377
BCP 17389
BCP 23575
BCP 41516
LMP 42379BCP20686LMP 42
377BCP 23575
B C P 3 8 2 6 6
BCP 41516
P 38409
LMP 42380
102 AVE
J
ACKSON RD.102 B AVE.102 A AVE.
103 AVE.McEACHERN ST.248 ST.100 AVE.
´
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No.Map No. From:
To:
6861-20111543RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), M-2 (General Industrial)
R-1 (Residential District)RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
1:3,500
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6928-2012
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan
_______________________________________
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "A" & "C" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open
meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 6928-2012
2. Schedule "A", Section 10.2.1 Land Use Designations, Albion Area Plan map is hereby
amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot A Section 3 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP9830
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 833, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby re-designated to Medium Density Residential and
Conservation.
3. Schedule “C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot A Section 3 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP9830
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 834, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation.
4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 200 .
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ A SECOND TIME the day of , A.D. 200 .
READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 200 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED , the day of , A.D. 2012.
___________________________________ _____________________________
MAYOR CORPORATE OFFICER
Appendix C
24616102501
0
2
6
224665
10040
10303
24632246422465210275
10286
2474024735
2476024765
10268
10295
24725
2479524790 24539246021026510296
10298
10316
10322
10235
10190 24662246611027224673 2469110312
24720
24755
24770247712478510306
2462210309
1025610292 2477510307
24554/7210150246 08246532468510302
247502478010076
10104
10289
10278
10306
2473024745 24752
10125
10295
10180
Re
m S.
1
/
2
OF N.E.
1
/
4
SEC.
3
BCP 20685
A
9
6
1
BCP 23574
121
BCP 46878
A
9
25
1
PARK
LOT A
45 46 1
EPP 9830
PARK
3
8
65
BCP 3463568
PARK
4
69
123
BCP 17387
16
BCP 46878
BCP 43808
BCP 47688
47
BCP 33649
PARK
PARK BCP 46878
3
120
BCP 17387
14 15127
67
PARK
B BBCP 46878
NWP 6502
BCP38265
5
66
2
PARK6 BCP 1738711
12
26
17
Municipal gravel pit
BCP 46878
6
2
Rem N 1/2 of NE 1/4
122
7
5
13
PARK
Municipal gravel pit
63
Provincial gravel pit
64
4
Section 3 Township 12
5
8
10
4
PARK
2
*LMP 5856
BCP 46878
44
43
10
126
7
3
27
BCP 41516
BCP 40804
BCP 41517
LMP 42377
BCP 17389
BCP 23575
BCP 41516
LMP 42379BCP20686LMP 42
377BCP 23575
B C P 3 8 2 6 6
BCP 41516
P 38409
LMP 42380
102 AVE
J
ACKSON RD.102 B AVE.102 A AVE.
103 AVE.McEACHERN ST.248 ST.100 AVE.
´
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING
Bylaw No.Map No. From:
To:
6928-2011833Low/Medium Density Residential, Medium Density Residential
ConservationMedium Density Residential
1:3,500
24616102501
0
2
6
224665
10040
10303
24632246422465210275
10286
2474024735
2476024765
10268
10295
24725
2479524790 24539246021026510296
10298
10316
10322
10235
10190 24662246611027224673 2469110312
24720
24755
24770247712478510306
2462210309
1025610292 2477510307
24554/7210150246 08246532468510302
247502478010076
10104
10289
10278
10306
2473024745 24752
10125
10295
10180
Re
m S.
1
/
2
OF N.E.
1
/
4
SEC.
3
BCP 20685
A
9
6
1
BCP 23574
121
BCP 46878
A
9
25
1
PARK
LOT A
45 46 1
EPP 9830
PARK
3
8
65
BCP 3463568
PARK
4
69
123
BCP 17387
16
BCP 46878
BCP 43808
BCP 47688
47
BCP 33649
PARK
PARK BCP 46878
3
120
BCP 17387
14 15127
67
PARK
B BBCP 46878
NWP 6502
BCP38265
5
66
2
PARK6 BCP 1738711
12
26
17
Municipal gravel pit
BCP 46878
6
2
Rem N 1/2 of NE 1/4
122
7
5
13
PARK
Municipal gravel pit
63
Provincial gravel pit
64
4
Section 3 Township 12
5
8
10
4
PARK
2
*LMP 5856
BCP 46878
44
43
10
126
7
3
27
BCP 41516
BCP 40804
BCP 41517
LMP 42377
BCP 17389
BCP 23575
BCP 41516
LMP 42379BCP20686LMP 42
377BCP 23575
B C P 3 8 2 6 6
BCP 41516
P 38409
LMP 42380
102 AVE
J
ACKSON RD.102 B AVE.102 A AVE.
103 AVE.McEACHERN ST.248 ST.100 AVE.
´
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING
Bylaw No.Map No. Purpose:
6928-2011834To Add To Conservation
1:3,500
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012
and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/024/09
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Second Reading;
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6867-2011
25467 Bosonworth Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), to permit a future subdivision of 4 lots.
The proposed RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zoning complies with the Official Community
Plan.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6867-2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing; and
2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading.
i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of
the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement;
ii. Amendment to Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan;
iii. Road dedication as required;
iv. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office
which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development;
v. Removal of the existing buildings that will not comply with future lot lines;
vi. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether
there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site
profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the
regulations.
1105
- 2 -
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Don Bowins
Owner: John H. Buckle, Judy L Duncan, Ty N. Vong, Nicole J. Buckle
Legal Description: Lot 6 Block 3 & 4 Section 14 Township 12 New
Westminster District Plan 17459
OCP:
Existing: Suburban Residential
Proposed: Suburban Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential in the ALR
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation Agriculture
South: Use: Single Family Strata
Zone: RG-2 (Suburban Residential Strata)
Designation: Suburban Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Suburban Residential
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Suburban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 2.030 HA. (5 acres)
Access: Bosonworth Avenue
Servicing requirement: Municipal water and septic fields
b) Project Description:
The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit subdivision into four (4) lots. It is currently
undeveloped except for one dwelling located on the center property. The land is proposed to be
subdivided in a manner to retain this building in compliance with the required setback on one of the
proposed lots. The proposed lots will be serviced by municipal water and on-lot septic systems.
The site slopes downward away from Bosonworth Avenue. At time of subdivision, the location, grade
and design of the driveways will accommodate emergency apparatus such as fire engines to access
buildings on the lots. There is a steeper slope towards the east and at the northeast parts of the site.
- 3 -
This area will be subject to a restrictive covenant to prevent disturbance and to retain it in its natural
state.
The property gains access from Bosonworth Avenue. This street has been recently been upgraded in
conjunction with the new rural subdivision to the south (SD-051-09).
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The properly is designated Suburban Residential in the Official Community Plan. The proposed
zoning, use, density and lot sizes align with this OCP designation.
The site borders the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) to the north and thus is subject to OCP policies
for sites along the ALR Boundary, namely:
Requiring agricultural impact assessments (AIAs) and Groundwater Impact Assessment of
non-farm development and infrastructure projects and identifying measures to off -set
impacts on agricultural capability;
Environmental Impact Assessments are to be completed where rezoning or subdivision is proposed
within or adjacent to natural features or significant lands identified in the OCP. Therefore, the
identified sloping areas in the eastern and northeastern part of the site will be subject to issuance of
a Natural Features Development Permit (NFDP) and registration of a conservation restrictive
covenant.
The required studies and reports have been submitted. Necessary legal documents (restrictive
covenants) and any identified actions or mitigation measures will be conditions set by the Approving
Officer as part of final subdivision approval, and the NFDP will be considered for issuance
concurrently with rezoning.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 25467 Bosonworth Avenue from
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit subdivision
into four lots.
The applicant has submitted a preliminary lot layout plan showing that the areas, width and depth of
each lot, the location of the dwelling unit being retained and proposed new building envelopes will
comply with the Zoning Bylaw.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit
application is required for all development and subdivision activity to ensure the preservation,
protection, restoration and enhancement for the natural environment and for development that is
protected from hazardous conditions for:
All areas designated Conservation on Schedule “B” or all areas within 50 metres of an
area designated Conservation on Schedule “B”, or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver
Valley Area Plan;
- 4 -
All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent;
All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural Features Schedule “C”
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting was not required for this proposal because the proposal is for
fewer than 25 units (lots), and is in compliance with Official Community Plan policies.
d) Environmental Implications:
Environment comments for this proposal are as follows:
1. A Natural Features Development Permit (NFDP) will be required due to the slopes on the
property.
2. The submitted Arborist Report needs to be revised to identify the tree that will be retained,
protected or removed.
3. The details and conclusions contained in the submitted Geotechnical and Hydrological
reports may need to be revised due to changes to the neighbouring location to the south and
the original application having this property separated from the property to the east (25590
Bosonworth Avenue).
4. Coordination between the civil engineer, geotechnical engineer and the environmental
consultants of record is required to determine whether the NFDP needs to address for
groundwater management, rainwater management and stormwater management mitigation
for the site for road infrastructure and the proposed lots. Surrounding sites, especially those
properties immediately to the north and down slope of this property and within the ALR
should not be impacted as a result of this proposed development.
5. In the event additional environmental concerns are identified they will be addressed through
the Natural features Development Permit.
e) Agricultural Impact:
An Agricultural Impact Assessment Report, dated September 4, 2011, was prepared for the
applicant by Letts Environmental Consultants. The conclusions of the report included:
1. Disclosure be prepared and provided to all homebuyers or prospective homebuyers of
parcels in the proposed subdivision about possible negative impacts, including noise, farm
smell, chemical sprays, and unsightliness arising from allowable agricultural activities.
Therefore, a restrictive covenant to this effect is proposed to be registered on title;
2. The greatest potential impact on agriculture from the proposed development is drainage.
This can be mitigated through careful storm water and rainwater management.
f) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has advised required road and water services for this development are
not available. There is a development application (RZ/102/03 and SD/102/03) on the south side of
Bosonworth Avenue that as a condition of approval is to construct road and extend water services
that will satisfy the requirements for the subject site, except for dedication for road widening.
- 5 -
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the subdivision is completed they
will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that
there will be an additional 4 trees which is based on one tree per lot. The final subdivision design
will provide exact numbers. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance
requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $100.00.
Fire Department:
Comments from the Fire Department relating to the location, grade and design of the driveways to
accommodate emergency apparatus such as fire engines to access buildings on the lots will be
addressed through the subdivision process.
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6867-
2011 and that application RZ/024/09 be forwarded to Public Hearing.
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, MCAHP
Planning Technician
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL., MCIP
Director of Planning
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
AK/
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Zone Amending Bylaw 6867-2011
Appendix C – Site Plan
"Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski"
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
"Original signed by Frank Quinn"
"Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
Appendix A
CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 6867-2011
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6867-2011."
2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 6 Block 3 & 4 Section 14 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 17459
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1545 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential).
3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 11th day of October, A.D. 2011.
READ a second time the day of , A.D. 20 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , A.D. 20 .
READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 .
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of , A.D. 20 .
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
Appendix B
2538025450254922550225536255201113025422 2546025505255592559525360253852542525442254452544325500255182554125596253552546525494254672554225580254852555625399254402548025588253502537025390254662548225590255542559225420255182552325540255722557725580BOSONWORTH AVE.
GODWIN DRIVE
P 32801
SL65 EPS 234
SL75
SL67
P 34100
SL55 SL54
EPS 234
SL64
SL38 SL39 SL40
SL61
11
SL44
SL48
EPS 234
P 35648
P 41743
8
SL51
SL45
12
SL47
SL68
SL56
SL66
P 17459
9
P 17459
SL60
5
41
SL80
Rem 25
SL37
SL63
SL41 SL43
SL49
SL46SL78
59
10
P 17459
SL58
28
SL35
SL36
7
SL53 SL52
SL59
SL79
SL74
SL34
6
SL62
SL42
SL50
SL57
EPP 7740
EPP 7740
EPP 7741
EPP 7740EPP 7740
BCP 39013EPP 7740
EPP 7741
EPP 7740 EPP 7740 EPP 7740EPP 7741 EPP 7741
EPP 7742
SL78
SL82
BOSONWORTH AVE.256 ST.CARMICHAEL ST.´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING
Bylaw No.Map No. From:
To:
6867-20111545RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-059-DP
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Heritage Alteration Permit – Billy Miner Pub Heritage Site
22355 River Road
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On May 4, 2011, Council adopted a Heritage Designation and Revitalization and Tax Exemption
Agreement (HRA) Bylaw No. 6760-2010 for the Billy Miner Pub site, where the historic Bank of
Montreal and the Port Haney Post Office buildings are located.
The Port Haney Post Office was most recently used as a liquor store. The owners are requesting to
change the use to a coffee shop/restaurant. Some building alterations are needed to undertake this
new business venture. Since the building is protected through HRA Bylaw No. 6760 -2010 Sections
972 and 973 of the Local Government Act require Council to approve a HRA prior to any work being
undertaken.
This report outlines the details of the Heritage Alteration Permit application and the preservation of
the site’s heritage value through the building alteration process.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal the Heritage Alteration Permit respecting
property located at 22355 River Road.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Ken Brookes
Owner: Alpenhaus Restaurants Ltd.
Legal Description: Lot: 1, D.L.: 398, Block: 1, BCP 47640
OCP :
Existing: Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial & Mixed-Use
Proposed: Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial & Mixed-Use
Zoning:
Existing: H-1 (Heritage Commercial), C-4 (Neighbourhood
Public House Commercial)
Other: Heritage Revitalization Agreement Bylaw No.
6760-2010
1106
- 2 -
Surrounding Uses
North: Use: Vacant
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial & Mixed-Use
South: Use: Railway Transportation Corridor
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), RS-1 (One
Family Urban Residential), M-2 (General Industrial)
Designation: Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial & Mixed-Use
East: Use: Haney Bypass Road Right-of-Way
Zone: N/A
Designation: N/A
West: Use: Vacant
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) – Rezoning
application underway for 4-storey residential use
Designation: Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial & Mixed-Use
Existing Use of Property: Neighbourhood Pub
Proposed Use of Property: Neighbourhood Pub, Restaurant and Coffee Shop
Site Area: 1,280 m2
Access: River Road and 223rd Street
Servicing: Urban
Previous Applications: RZ/056/10
b) Project Description:
The Billy Miner Pub has been in operation for over 30 years and has become a well -known
establishment in Maple Ridge. The pub is located in the former Port Haney Bank of Montreal
building, constructed in 1911, and which celebrated its 100th birthday last year.
In more recent years the adjacent Port Haney Post Office building, which was constructed in 1933,
was used as a liquor store. When the site came under new ownership in 2010, the property own ers
closed the Port Haney liquor store and moved the retail licence to a new location on Dewdney Trunk
Road and 240th Street. Since then, the Post Office building has been vacant.
The property owners are now proposing to open a coffee shop/restaurant in the Port Haney Post
Office building that will be more of a family-oriented part of the Billy Miner establishment. Menu
items will be shared between the pub and restaurant buildings. New patio space was recently
constructed between the two buildings for patrons to enjoy outdoor seating during the summer
months.
c) Planning Analysis:
The subject site is designated as Port Haney Multi-Family, Commercial and Mixed-Use in the Town
Centre Area Plan. This designation allows for a range of uses that are desired for the redevelopment
of the Port Haney area. The adaptive re-use of heritage buildings is encouraged through policy 3-9
and this policy essentially supports the flexibility that is achieved through a Heritage Revitalization
Agreement and a Heritage Alteration Permit:
3-9 The adaptive re-use of heritage buildings and sites is encouraged, by potentially
converting a single-family use to a commercial or institutional use, or vice-versa
(where land-use designation and appropriate zoning permits), or from a single-family
use to a duplex or multi-family use. This policy applies to buildings and/or sites that
are determined by the District of Maple Ridge to have heritage value and/or heritage
- 3 -
character, including listings on the Maple Ridge Heritage Inventory or the Maple
Ridge Heritage Register.
The Port Haney Post Office building will operate as a coffee shop, serving items such as coffee, tea
and muffins during the early part of the day and operate as a full service restaurant from lunchtime
to evening. Although the coffee-shop/restaurant will mostly prepare snack food items, the owners
also intend to install a pizza oven in the coffee shop/ restaurant and this menu item will be available
to patrons in both buildings.
The attached plans show a small 96 sq. ft. addition to the rear of the Port Haney Post Office building
to accommodate the pizza oven. Additionally, some interior alterations are proposed that include:
1) Removing wall covering from two original window openings on the east facing wall;
2) Covering up an original window opening on the rear wall;
3) Creating a new opening on the rear wall below the one being covered up to create an
access to the pizza oven; and
4) Removing some of the building siding at the rear, which is necessary for the pizza oven
installation.
Heritage Alteration Permit
Section 972 of the Local Government Act enables a local government to permit alterations to a
protected heritage site through a Heritage Alteration Permit. Best practices for intended alterations
to a heritage site are prescribed in the Standards & Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic
Places in Canada publication, which was a collaborative effort amongst the Federal, Provincial, and
Territorial jurisdictions of Canada (see www.historicplaces.ca).
On March 24, 2009, Council adopted the Standards & Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic
Places in Canada to be the guide for conservation of all protected heritage sites in Maple Ridge.
Additionally, the Heritage Revitalization Agreement bylaw template developed for Maple Ridge
includes a requirement to follow the recommendations of the Standards & Guidelines document.
Heritage Consultant Assessment:
The proposed amendments have been reviewed by a Heritage Consultant, Donald Luxton &
Associates, who prepared the Statements of Significance (Appendix C) for the site. As shown in the
attached Heritage Review report prepared by Donald Luxton (Appendix D), new additions to a
heritage building are categorized as a “rehabilitation” project in the Standards & Guidelines
publication.
In the report, the consultant states that the addition proposed at the rear of the building “is the least
intrusive to heritage value and heritage character-defining elements”. Additionally, he states that the
appearance of the addition being a “lean-to” structure “is appropriate to historic vernacular
architecture”. His assessment of each building intervention is as follows:
Lean-to Structure: It is distinguished from the original structure through the use of a shed
roof, pitched away from the rear façade. The appearance of the front and side facades of
the original building will not be affected, and the original brick chimney will be retained.
Siding: Where necessary, the existing siding will be cut to allow the attachment of the
addition. Siding will be examined for suitability for salvage, and retained for re-use if
possible. New wooden siding on the addition will match the original in profile, will have
- 4 -
matching cornerboards and will be painted in the same colour. There will be an interior
opening to the pizza oven that will be framed in as required.
Roofing: The new roofing will be new low-profile duroid shingles to match the existing roof
covering.
New Venting: New metal venting will be used to vent the pizza oven that will be clearly
distinguishable from the original brick chimney.
Windows: One original rear façade window will be removed and infilled. The upper window
in the rear gable will not be affected. Two windows on the east side of the building that are
currently covered over will be opened up.
The heritage consultant provided further information on how the addition will be made
distinguishable from the original building. His comments are as follows:
“the intent is that the addition will be distinguishable through its form, which is that of an
historic lean-to addition and clearly not part of the original building. We do not wish to
differentiate the siding as it will introduce a patch-work appearance that will be out of
character with the historic construction. We therefore wish to take a more subtle approach
to distinguishability. The addition will be differentiated at close range as the surface texture
of the new siding will also be smoother and have less coats of paint than the earlier siding.”
The consultant assessed the above proposed alterations with the list of character -defining elements
identified in the attached Statement of Significance and concluded that “none of the noted
character-defining elements will be affected except for the removal of one window on the rear
façade. This is considered to be a minor intervention to overall heritage character”.
The Standards & Guidelines publication was used by the heritage consultant to guide the
assessment and the following statements are a general summary of his comments on the
conservation standards within the publication:
The proposed work conforms and is acceptable. Heritage character-defining elements
(CDEs) have been determined in the Statement of Significance, and their heritage value is
maintained by the proposed interventions.
The proposed use allows retention of CDE’s and is a sensitive adaptive use.
It is required in the HRA bylaw that a “Registered Professional” oversee the work and complete a
“Confirmation of Commitment” form, along with the property owner, that confirms that the registered
professional is fully aware of the standards and common pra ctices of heritage conservation in British
Columbia. Donald Luxton is a fellow of Architecture Canada and a member of the Canadian
Association of Heritage Professionals. Mr. Luxton’s extensive heritage background and long history
of heritage conservation project work in Maple Ridge, including the Maple Ridge Heritage Inventory
and many of the listings on the Maple Ridge Community Heritage Register have provided numerous
examples of his Maple Ridge experience.
d) Advisory Design Panel:
This addition to the historic Port Haney Post Office building is minor and not considered to be a
significant project for review.
- 5 -
e) Intergovernmental Issues:
As this heritage alteration project is considered to be minor in nature, by the heritage consultant, a
referral to the BC Heritage Branch is not necessary.
f) Environmental Implications:
None.
g) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Expanding the use of the Billy Miner Pub to include a family-oriented establishment in the historic
Port Haney Post Office, will help open up this area of town to a wider range of visitors and patrons.
h) Financial Implications:
None.
CONCLUSION:
Protecting the heritage value of the Billy Miner Pub helps preserve the early days of Maple Ridge,
and particularly Port Haney, for the community to experience and appreciate. The adoption of the
Heritage Revitalization Agreement Bylaw No. 6760-2010 permitted sufficient flexibility for the
historic site to adapt to a new use. The intent of a Heritage Alteration Permit is similar to that of a
Heritage Revitalization Agreement, in that it permits adjustments to be made after the HRA bylaw is
in place, thereby continuing to support the evolving uses of the site, while also continuing to protect
the site’s heritage value.
_________________________________________________
Prepared by: Lisa Zosiak, Planner
_____________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP
Director of Planning
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Site Plan
Appendix B – Plan Showing Proposed Alteration
Appendix C – Statements of Significance
Appendix D – Heritage Consultant Assessment
Appendix E - Confirmation of Commitment Form
"Original signed by Lisa Zosiak"
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
"Original signed by Frank Quinn"
"Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX C
Thursday, May 24, 2012
Attention: Lisa Zosiak
Planner
District of Maple Ridge
Dear Ms. Zosiak;
RE: 22 35 5 River Roa d, Maple Ridge, B.C.: Heritage Review
Please accept this letter of review of compliance f or a Heritage Alteration Permit for the
proposed work on this protected heritage site, as follows:
• Subject Property: The Port Haney Post Office:
• Address: 22355 River Road
• Heritage Revitalization Agreement No. 6760-2010
My firm has been retained as Heritage Consultants for the project, and in addition to this
Review will contin ue to monitor the co nstruction p rocess, and will provide final sign-off as
part of ongoi ng Construction Admi nistration.
This He ritage Review of the proposed Sc ope of Work has bee n conducted following the
Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (2010) as well
as the Statement of Significance as revised in 2010. Unde r the guidelines, the conservation
work proposed for the Port Haney Post Office is a rehabilitation intervention:
Reha bilitation: the action or process of making possible a continuing or compatible
contemporary use of a historic place or an individual component, through repair,
alterations, and/or additions, while protecting its heritage value.
The rear of the building is proposed for a small addition that will house a pizza oven and
therefore improve the commercial functionality of the building. An intervention to the rear
of the building is the least intrusive to heritage value and heritage character-defining
elements.
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work includes a 96 square foot addition to the rear of the historic building.
The a ppeara nce is that of a “lean-to” addition that is appropriate to historic vernacular
architecture. It is distinguished from the original structure through the use of a shed roof,
pitched away from the rear façade. The appeara nce of the front and side facades of the
original building will not be affected, and the original brick chimney will be retained.
APPENDIX D
Page 2 of 4
• Siding: Where necessary, the existing siding will be cut to allow the attachment of
the addition. Siding will be examined for suitability for salvage, and retained for re-
use if possible. New wooden siding on the addition will match the original in
profile, will have matching cornerboards and will be painted in the same colour.
There will be an interior opening to the pizza oven that will be framed in as
required.
• Roofing: The new roofing will be new low-profile duroid shingles to match the
existing roof covering.
• New Venting: New metal venting will be used to vent the pizza over that will be
clearly distinguishable from the original brick chimney.
• Windows: One original rear façade window will be removed and infilled. The
upper window in the rear gable will not be affected. Two windows on the east side
of the building that are currently covered over will be opened up.
CONSERVATION STRATEGY
The primary intent is to conserve the existing historic structure, while undertaking a
rehabilitation that will increase its functionality for new commercial uses. Rehabilitation is
therefore the primary intent of the interventions.
The proposed intervention, a small addition at the rear, have been assessed against the
Standards, and its impact on the historic place has been assessed as follows.
CONSERVATION STANDARD PROPOSED INTERVENTION
GENERAL STANDARDS FOR ALL PROJECTS 22355 RIVER ROAD
1. Conserve the heritage value of a historic place. Do not remove,
replace, or substantially alter its intact or repairable character-
defining elements. Do not move a part of a historic place if its current
location is a character-defining element.
The proposed work conforms and is
acceptable. Heritage character-defining
Elements (CDEs) have been determined
in the Statement of Significance, and
their heritage value is maintained by the
proposed interventions.
2. Conserve changes to a historic place, which over time, have
become character-defining elements in their own right.
The proposed work conforms and is
acceptable.
3. Conserve heritage value by adopting an approach calling for
minimal intervention.
The proposed work conforms and is
acceptable. The proposed use allows
retention of CDEs and a sensitive
adaptive reuse.
4. Recognize each historic place as a physical record of its time,
place and use. Do not create a false sense of historical development
by adding elements from other historic places or other properties or
by combining features of the same property that never coexisted.
The proposed work conforms and is
acceptable.
5. Find a use for a historic place that requires minimal or no change
to its character-defining elements.
The proposed commercial use conforms
to the historic nature of the building and
is acceptable.
Page 3 of 4
6. Protect and, if necessary, stabilize a historic place until any
subsequent intervention is undertaken. Protect and preserve
archaeological resources in place. Where there is potential for
disturbance of archaeological resources, take mitigation measures to
limit damage and loss of information.
The proposed work conforms and is
acceptable. There are no known
archaeological resources.
7. Evaluate the existing condition of character-defining elements to
determine the appropriate intervention needed. Use the gentlest
means possible for any intervention. Respect heritage value when
undertaking an intervention.
The proposed work conforms and is
acceptable.
8. Maintain character-defining elements on an ongoing basis. Repair
character-defining element by reinforcing the materials using
recognized conservation methods. Replace in kind any extensively
deteriorated or missing parts of character-defining elements, where
there are surviving prototypes.
The proposed work conforms and is
acceptable.
9. Make any intervention needed to preserve character-defining
elements physically and visually compatible with the historic place
and identifiable upon close inspection. Document any intervention
for future reference.
The proposed work and level of
documentation conforms and is
acceptable.
ADDITIONAL STANDARDS RELATING TO REHABILITATION 22355 RIVER ROAD
10. Repair rather than replace character-defining elements. Where
character-defining elements are too severely deteriorated to repair,
and where sufficient physical evidence exists, replace them with new
elements that match the forms, materials and detailing of sound
versions of the same elements. Where there is insufficient physical
evidence, make the form, material and detailing of the new elements
compatible with the character of the historic place.
The proposed work conforms and is
acceptable.
11. Conserve the heritage value and character-defining elements
when creating any new additions to a historic place and any related
new construction. Make the new work physically and visually
compatible with, subordinate to and distinguishable from the historic
place.
The proposed work conforms and is
acceptable.
12. Create any new additions or related new construction so that the
essential form and integrity of a historic place will not be impaired if
the new work is removed in the future.
The proposed work conforms and is
acceptable.
ADDITIONAL STANDARDS RELATING TO RESTORATION 22355 RIVER ROAD
13. Repair rather than replace character-defining elements from the
restoration period. Where character-defining elements are too
severely deteriorated to repair and where sufficient physical evidence
exists, replace them with new elements that match the forms,
materials and detailing of sound versions of the same elements.
Not applicable to this rehabilitation
project.
14. Replace missing features from the restoration period with new
features whose forms, materials and detailing are based on sufficient
physical, documentary and/or oral evidence.
Not applicable to this rehabilitation
project.
Page 4 of 4
IMPACT TO HERITAGE CHARACTER-DEFINING ELEMENTS
The following heritage character-defining elements were assessed as part of the analysis of
heritage value in the Statement of Significance prepared in 2010:
Key elements that define the heritage character of the Port Haney Post Office include
its:
• original siting and orientation to the street, and its proximate relationship to the
railway and to an adjacent heritage structure
• continuing commercial use
• commercial form, scale and massing, including its one and one-‐half-‐storey
height, front gabled roof with a skirt roof at the front, rectangular floor plan and
central front entry
• wood-‐frame construction including lapped wooden siding with cornerboards
• late influence of the Craftsman style including triangular eave brackets at the
front and rear, open soffits and exposed rafter tails
• internal red-‐brick chimney with corbelled top
• original windows including double-‐assembly, double-‐hung wooden-‐sash
windows on the east side, and
• 4-‐paned double sliding windows at the rear
As noted, none of the noted character-defining elements will be affected except for the
removal of one window on the rear façade. This is considered to be a minor intervention to
overall heritage character.
OVERALL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS
Based on this assessment, the proposed interventions to the character-defining elements of
the Port Haney Post Office, 22355 River Road, Maple Ridge, will not be significantly
impacted by the proposed interventions, and the heritage value of the structure will be
maintained.
Please let me know if you have any questions about this review. Thank you in advance for
your consideration.
Sincerely,
Donald Luxton, FRAIC, Principal
Donald Luxton & Associates Inc.
SCHEDULEF
CONFIRMA nON OF COMMITMENT BY OWNER
AND COORDINATING REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
This letter must be submitted before issuan(~e of a Heritage Alteration Permit or 1I building pennit.
To: TJU: J)[STRICT OF MAI-LE RIDGE
(the authority having jurisdiction)
Re: THE BANK OF MONTREAL AND THE PORT HANEY POST OFFICE
Address
r,7
The undersigned has retained ~CVA~Z._~.{f )c1'GJ ~. ___ as a coordinating
registered professional with experience ill hclitage conservation to coordinate the design work and field
reviews of the registered professionals required l for this heritage project. The coordinating registered
professionaJ shall coordinate the design work and field reviews of the registered professkmal required for
the proj{~Ct in order to ascertain that the design wil! substantially comply with the protection, restoration,
andlor rehabilitation of the Character-Defining Elements listed in the Statements of Significance for the
Bank or Montreal and the Port Haney Post Office. The tools that will be used to support tillS heritage
conservation work arc the:
1) Standards and Guiddil1esfor Ille Con:,;en'tltion (~r Historic Places in Canada;
2) B.C. Building Code;
3) and other applicable enactments respecting safety, not including the construction safety aspects.
For this project, field reviews are defined as those reviews of the work:
a) at a project site of a development to which a Hcrita.ge Alteration Permit relates, and
b) at fabrication location where building components are made that will replace deteriorated
materials identified a;:; character-defining elements for this prnject.
That a registered professional in his or her professional discretion considers necessary to ascertain
whether t.he work suh~tantially complies in all matclial respects with the plans and supporting documents
prepared by the registered professional and with the Heritage Designation and Revitalization Agreement
Bylaw No. 6760-2010, for which the Heritage Alteration Permit is issued.
The owner and the coordinating registered professional have read the Statements of Significance for the
Bank of Montreaf and the Port Haney Post Office, and the Slallcionis and Guidelines for the
Conservation of HL~toric Places ill Canada.. The owner and the coordinating registered profe:;sional each
acknowledge their responsibility to notify the addressee of this letter of the dale the coordinating
registered professiona! ceases to be retained by the owner before the date that the coordinating registered
profc,ssional ceases to be reta.incd or. if IhM is not possible, then as soon as possible. The coordinating
registered professiullnl ucknowledgcs the responsibility to notify the addressee of this letter of the date a
1 lL is the fe~p()nsibi!ity of the coordi nating registered professional to ascertain which registered professionals are
required.
APPENDIX E
registered professional cea&es to be retained before the date the registered professional ceases to be
retained or, if that is not possible. then as soon as possible.
The owner and the coordinating registered professional understand that where the coordinating registered
professional or a registered professional ceases to be retained al any time during constrllction, work on
the above project will cease until Sllch time as:
a) a new coordimlting professional or registered professional, as the case may
be, is retained, and
b) a new letter in the Conn set out in Schedule D in the Heritage Designation and
Revitalization Agreement Bylaw No. 6760-2010, is filled with the authority having
jurisdiction.
Tbe undersigned coordinating registered professional certifies that he or she is a registered professional
as defined in the British Columbia Building Code, who also has experience with heritage conservation
projects and agrees to coordinate the design work and field reviews of the registered professionals
required for the project as outlined in the attached plans and specifications.
CoordInating Registered. Professional
~At,..D . L).)")(.roO\l
Name (please Print)
.[ a~e of Agent or s:g~Otlice (if applicable)
_~L 4Al/?_-_
Date
Owners appointed agent's signature (if o\\mer is ,.1
corporatioll the signature 01';1 signing ofllcer must be given
here. If the signature is that of the agent. a copy of the
document that app()im~ the agent must be artached.}
(if the C(Klrdinating registered professional is a member of a tinn, pkese compl.elc the !()llowing)
I am a member of the firm .~.p UJ~..:t..A:ss ac...J.....~-'--and I sign this
letter on behalf of the firm.
i
L".~._~.. . ...._ .. _.~. .._~._~.... __ ........_
V\'\&-\A 3 12 !O..~l2__
Date I J
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: June 4, 2012
and Members of Council FILE NO: DVP/075/10
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit
10455 and 10481 245B Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A Development Variance Permit application has been received in support of subdivision application
SD/075/10. The application is for an 11 lot RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
subdivision for three properties located at 10455, 10469 and 10481 245B Street. This
Development Variance Permit is for two of the properties (10455 and 10481 245B Street) only. The
purpose of the Development Variance Permit is to vary the minimum lot width for the lots fronting
245 Street to 14.34 metres rather than the proposed RS-1b zone minimum lot width of 15 metres.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP/075/10 respecting properties located
at 10455 and 10481 245B Street.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context
Applicant: Don Schmidt
Owners: Janice and Brian Ahonen
Rebecca Awram
Legal Description: Lots 2 and 4, Sections 10 and 11, Township 12,
NWD Plan 72100
OCP :
Existing: Low/Medium Density Residential
Proposed: Low/Medium Density Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential)
Designation: Low Medium Density Residential
1107
- 2 -
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Designation: Low Medium Density Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Designation: Low Medium Density Residential
West: Use: School
Zone: P-1 (Park and School)
Designation: Institutional
Existing Use of Property: Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Residential
Site Area: 1.2 hectares (2.96 acres)
Access: 245 and 245B Street
Companion Applications: RZ/075/10, SD/075/10, 2011-032-DP
Requested Variance: Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985: Schedule D –RS-1b: To vary
the minimum lot width from 15 metres to 14.34 metres for
lots 1, 2, 3, 6,7 and 8.
b) Project Description:
The applicant has applied to rezone three properties located at 10455, 10469, and 10481 245B
Street from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential) to permit eight new lots on the 245 Street frontage and retain the existing dwellings on
three large lots fronting 245B Street.
As part of the subdivision process, the applicant is seeking a lot width variance on lots 1,2,3,6,7 and
8 (existing 10455 and 10481 245B Street) to preserve the existing hedging and a storm right-of-way
identified as a watercourse situated between proposed lots 5 and 6. The proposed variance is to
allow a 14.34 metre lot width rather than the minimum lot width of 15 metres for six proposed lots
on two of the three parent properties.
Currently, there is a significant hedge along the property lines of lots 1,3,4,9 and 11, and a storm
right-of-way on the south property line of lot 5 and 10. The Environmental Consultant has identified
that the open channel within the storm right-of-way is a watercourse due to its role in conveying
nutrients to downstream fish bearing systems.
Without the lot width variance, some hedging and the watercourse would be impacted. By keeping
the existing property lines, the hedging and watercourse can be preserved. The applicant has
completed a Watercourse Protection Development Permit and will be registering a tree protection
covenant to preserve a number of hedge stems and significant trees on the development site and
widen the storm right-of-way to allow for future maintenance access to the open channel.
c) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The subject sites are designated Low Medium Density Residential in the Albion Area Plan and the
proposed RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zoning complies with this
designation.
- 3 -
Zoning Bylaw:
The proposed lots meet the minimum zoning requirements for lot area and lot depth in the RS-1b
(One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone. The lot width variance for six of the 11
proposed lots from 15 to 14.34 metres is the only requested variance.
d) Alternatives:
Instead of permitting the lot width variance, the proposed subdivision plan for eight lots on 245
Street could be revised to satisfy the minimum lot width; however, the existing hedging and
watercourse could not be retained. Alternatively, the subdivision plan could be revised to satisfy the
minimum lot width and be designed to maintain the existing hedging and watercourse In this case
the lot yield would be reduced.
CONCLUSION:
The development variance request is for less than a metre reduction in lot width and facilitates
preservation of significant hedging and a watercourse. Therefore, it is recommended that
Development Variance Permit DVP/075/10 be approved.
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Amelia Bowden
Planning Technician
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, MCP, MCIP
Director of Planning
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
AB/dp
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Subdivision Layout
Appendix C – Tree Protection Plan
"Original signed by Amelia Bowden"
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
"Original signed by Frank Quinn"
"Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 04, 2012
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-019-DP/DVP
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Development Permit & Development Variance Permit
11378 Kingston Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Development Permit and Development Variance Permit applications have been received for the
subject site to support a proposed multi-tenant Industrial building in the M-3 (Business Park) zone.
This is a zoned site and the M-3 (Business Park) zone permits a variety of industrial uses. The
Development Permit application is to regulate the form and character of the proposed industrial
building and the Development Variance Permit application is to vary some setbacks facing 113B
Avenue and Kingston Street as described in this report.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012/DVP/019 respecting property
located at 11378 Kingston Street; and further
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012/DP/019 respecting property located
at 11378 Kingston Street.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Rudy Giovanni, Adriatic Construction Commercial Ltd.
Owner: Marinelli Investments(Kingston) Ltd.
Legal Description: Lot: 35, Group: 1; D.L.: 280, Plan: 86659; PID: 016-470-087
OCP:
Existing: Industrial
Proposed: Industrial
Zoning:
Existing: M-3 (Business Park)
Proposed: M-3 (Business Park)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Industrial and 113B Avenue
Zone: M-3 (Business Park)
Designation: Industrial
1108
- 2 -
South: Use: Industrial
Zone: M-3 (Business Park)
Designation: Industrial
East: Use: Industrial
Zone: M-3 (Business Park)
Designation: Industrial
West: Use: Industrial and Kingston Street
Zone: M-3 (Business Park)
Designation: Industrial
Existing Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: Multi-tenanted Industrial building
Access: Kingston Street
Servicing: Full Urban
Previous Applications: None
b) Project Description:
The subject site (Appendix A), 2460 m2 in area is located in the Maple Meadows Industrial Park in
west Maple Ridge and is subject to the Industrial Development Permit Guidelines as outlined in the
Official Community Plan. The site is located within the flood plain and thus will be required to register
a flood plain covenant at the Building permit stage.
The proposed building is a concrete tilt-up structure with some steel and glass façade and stone
veneer cladding along the base of each unit entrance. The proposed building is approximately
1176.80 m2 (12,667 ft2) in area and is 8.61 metres in height. A future partial mezanine floor may
be added in the future. The loading doors for each unit and all the parking is proposed to the south
of the proposed structure, with vehicular access into the parking area provided from Kingston Street.
It is anticipated to be a multi-tenanted building with six industrial units, 22 parking stalls and six
loading bays. Garbage and recycling is proposed in the south-east corner of the site, enclosed by a
post and rail fence.
Proposed landscaping includes some street trees facing Kingston street and 113B Avenue bordered
by a decorative allan block retaining wall, sodded boulevard, permeable concrete pavers on the
amenity patio, concrete walkways from both the streets, concrete picnic table and bike racks for
visitors. The Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan (Appendix E) proposes installing a stormtech
chamber system under the parking area and rock pit filtration system.
c) Planning Analysis:
The purpose of the Industrial Development Permit is to promote quality Industrial development
through attractive design that is compatible with adjacent development and conforms to the Official
Community Plan guidelines.
Applications for Development Permits are assessed against the following Key Design concepts, as
follows:
1. Provide a street presence with entrances and architectural interest in building designs
fronting public streets.
- 3 -
Proposed landscaping fronting 113B Avenue and Kingston Street is an effort to provide better street
presence and soften the hard surfaces of the structure. The façade facing 113B Avenue is staggered
to avoid monotony and present a well articulated streetscape (Appendix C). Pedestrian connectivity is
enhanced from both the streets by walkways and to the parking/garbage enclosure with a concrete
paver walkway along the eastern property boundary. Concrete sidewalk accesses from 113B Avenue
and Kingston Street improve overall pedestrian connectivity (Appendix B). The proposed materials
such as concrete tilt up, glass and steel panels for the façade with stone veneer cladding at
prominent areas are anticipated to create articulated architectural facades fronting both the streets
(Appendix C).
2. Loading facilities should be located away from public streets and into the rear or the interior
of a site.
The proposed loading doors for each unit face south as shown on the Site Plan, away from the 113B
Avenue (Appendix B) and the public realms.
3. Outdoor storage and less attractive structures such as accessory buildings should be
screened with fencing or landscape.
All their storage areas are located inside the units as this is anticipated to be multi-tenanted. There
are no accessory buildings proposed. The garbage enclosure is screened by a six feet tall, post and
rail fence as shown on the landscaping plan (Appendix D).
4. The transportation needs of diverse users should be accommodated through amenities such
as bicycle facilities and accessible design for the mobility impaired.
This structure is anticipated to be a multi-tenanted industrial building, so the owner has proposed 22
parking stalls instead of the required 19 stalls. A handicapped parking spot is also provided at the
parking entrance as shown on the Site Plan (Appendix B). A bicycle rack is proposed facing Kingston
Street close to the secondary building entrance.
5. The form and treatment of new buildings should reflect the desired character and pattern of
development in the area by incorporating appropriate architectural styles, features,
materials, proportions and building articulation.
Most buildings in the vicinity were built prior to the current Official Community Plan industrial
guidelines adopted in 2006. This building proposes an attractive, well articulated building façade
along both the street frontages. Proposed mezzanine floor glazing fenestrations are complementary
to the raised parapet detailing and steel roof canopies, while the steel and glass entrance canopies
maintain a functional continuity. Stone cladding on bases of the unit front facades adds to the entry
statement (Appendix C).
Zoning Bylaw:
The subject site is zoned M-3 (Business park). The project is in compliance with the maximum
permitted lot coverage, height and parking required for this zone. The applicant is seeking some
setback variances to the building facades facing both 113B Avenue and Kingston Street and
canopies facing 113B Avenue and Kingston Street as described below.
- 4 -
d) Variances to the Zoning Bylaw:
The applicant is seeking the following variances:
i) Part 8, Section 803(6) (a) of the M-3 zone (Business Park) of the Zoning Bylaw, to vary the
front yard setback (facing 113B Avenue) to the building façade from 6.0 metres to 3.0
metres;
ii) Part 8, Section 803(6) (d) of the M-3 zone (Business Park) of the Zoning Bylaw, to vary the
exterior side yard setback (facing Kingston Street) from 4.5 metres to 4.29 metres;
iii) Part 4, Section 403 (4)(b)(1) of the Zoning Bylaw, to vary the siting of the front yard canopies
(facing 113B Avenue) from 4.75 metres to 1.70 metres;
iv) Part 4, Section 403 (4)(b)(1) of the Zoning Bylaw, to vary the siting of the exterior side yard
canopies (facing Kingston Street) from 3.25 metres to 2.99 metres.
The setback variances proposed for the building façade facing 113B Avenue and Kingston Street are
with an intention of providing the parking behind the building, offering a better street presence by
staggering the units and enhancing the urban streetscape. The canopies are proposed only above
the entrance doors to provide weather protection for each unit at intermittent locations and not
along the full horizontal length of the facades. These variances are not anticipated to negatively
impact any neigbours.
e) Off- Street Parking and Loading Bylaw:
As per the Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw, an industrial use in the M-3 (Business
Park) zone requires 1 parking space per 93 m2 gross floor area giving a total of 19 parking spaces
required. The applicant has proposed 22 parking spaces (including one handicapped parking space)
and six loading bays with an intention of providing adequate number of spaces per unit for a multi -
tenanted facility like this one.
f) Advisory Design Panel:
On April 10, 2012 the Advisory Design Panel reviewed the proposed development and recommended
the the application be supported and the following concerns be addressed as the design develops
and submitted to Planning staff for follow up:
Consider a pedestrian access from Kingston Street to the side entrance;
Consider adding a dedicated pathway on the east side that connects to the waste and
recycling enclosure;
Consider expanding or increasing the planting around the property line to formalize the
layout and provide a green edge or step the landscaping with the sidewalk;
Coordinate the street tree locations with the hydro pole boxes;
Consider continuation of the stone treatment on the north elevation;
Provide detail for the building exterior lighting plans;
Consider a planting screen or hand rail around the amenity area.
The applicant has revised the proposed drawings to accommodate these concerns.
- 5 -
g) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department have reviewed the proposal and confirmed that all the off-site services
exist in this area.
Fire Department:
The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and comments have been provided to the applicant.
The applicant has ensured that all these will be addressed through the Building Permit drawings.
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the Development Permit is
completed they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. The Manager of Parks & Open
Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their
budget requirements.
Building Department:
The Building Department has reviewed the proposal and comments have been provided to the
applicant. The applicant has ensured that all these will be addressed through the Building Permit
drawings to comply with the code requirements.
h) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The mail-outs to inform residents of the proposed variances were mailed 10 days prior to the
anticipated Council Meeting date (i.e. June 12, 2012). Concerned residents in the neighbourhood
have had the opportunity to voice their opinions.
i) Financial Implications:
In accordance with Council’s Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of
the estimated landscape cost will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision o f landscaping in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on a cost -estimate
provided by the Landscape Architect, the security will be $ 16,245.00 payable prior to the issuance
of a Development Permit.
j) Alternatives:
As per Section 8.6 of the Official Community Plan, an Industrial Development Permit is required for
all new industrial development within the urban area on lands designated “Industrial” on Schedule B
of the Official Community Plan. The subject site, designated “Industrial” on Schedule B, prior to a
Building Permit application, requires Council approval of an Industrial Development Permit. This is a
zoned site.
- 6 -
CONCLUSION:
The proposed Industrial building follows the OCP’s Industrial design guidelines and will provide new
employment opportunities for the community. The proposed setback variances are minor in nature
and not anticipated to negatively impact any neighbours. Therefore it is recommended that 2012-
019-DP and 2012-019-VP be approved for issuance.
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Rasika Acharya, B-Arch, M-Tech, UD, LEED® AP, MCIP
Planner
_____________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP
Director of Planning
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject map
Appendix B – Site Plan
Appendix C – Building Elevations & Sections
Appendix D – Landscape Plan
Appendix E – Preliminary Storm water Management and Erosion Sediment Control Plan
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
"Original signed by Frank Quinn"
"Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
"Original signed by Rasika Acharya"
City of PittMeadows
District ofLangley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE : M ay 7, 2012 FILE: 2012-019-DP BY: PC
11378 KINGSTON STREET
CORPOR ATION OFTHE DIST RIC T OFMAPLE R IDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT2012711455
11410
11443
11469
11442
20124201422
01
59 201652009111405
11450
2017211378
11475
200712007011476
11430
200502
01
61200602006611315
11393 2011911435
11470
2
01
63
113 B AVE.KINGSTON ST.201 A ST.Lot 1
LMP 41075
BCP 32752
P 86659
LMS 1635
109
Rem 7
LOT 1
538
2
P 15901F
5
6
21
25
27 LMS 2909P 8665926 P 8665931
Rem H
Pcl. 3
Pcl. 2
35
LMS 3846
LMP 25176 LMS 2889 LMP 24825BCP 451374
22
P 86659Pcl. 1 P 86659LMS 2547
Pcl. A
1
Rem 8
A
P 86659
LMS 3029
LMP 25175
P 86659
28
539
540
L
M
P 8
8
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
SCALE 1:2,000
APPENDIX A
1109
District of Maple Ridge
MEMORANDUM
TO:His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE:June 4, 2012
and Members of Council
FROM:Liz Holitzki,MEETING:Committee of the Whole
Director of Licences, Permits & Bylaws
SUBJECT:Proposed Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide Council with an updated Recommendation to the one
put forth at the Council Workshop of April 30, 2012. At the Council Workshop the approved
recommendation was to forward the attached report to a future Committee of the Whole. The report
and proposed Bylaw are attached to this memo for Council’s consideration and approval of three
readings.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6925-2012 be read a first, second and third time.
There have been no changes made to the Council report of April 30, 2012 or to the proposed Bylaw
since it’s submission to Council Workshop of April 30, 2012.
“Original signed by Liz Holitzki”
_______________________________________________
Liz Holitzki, Director of Licences,Permits & Bylaws
Page 1 of 2
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: April 30, 2012
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council Workshop
SUBJECT: New Building Bylaw 6925-2012
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The current Building Bylaw was adopted in 2003. Since then, the Provincial Government has
adopted a new BC Building Code, the new Safety Standards Act of BC, the Safety Standards
Electrical and Gas Regulations and the new Provincial Sewerage Regulations and their ongoing
amendments. A new updated bylaw is required to provide consistency with these new regulations.
The Bylaw (attached as Appendix I) is drafted to include regulatory wording intended to decrease the
risk of potential liability to the District associated with the monitoring of building, plumbing, gas and
electrical work carried on within the District of Maple Ridge. The adoption of the new proposed Bylaw
will allow for the repeal of the existing outdated Building Bylaw No. 6180-2003. It is intended that
following Council’s review at Workshop of the Bylaw will be forwarded to Committee of the Whole.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6925 - 2012 be referred to a future Committee of the
Whole.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The attached Building Bylaw clarifies and defines the roles and responsibilities of municipal
building officials, professional engineers, architects and owners in terms of construction works
carried on within the District of Maple Ridge. Emphasis has been placed on design
professionals, project coordinators, contractors and owners to provide proper design and
construction details related to their permit application. Also, emphasis will be placed on
professional engineers and architects to conduct field reviews and provide certification ensuring
complex buildings meet the BC Building Code requirements. Municipal building officials monitor
the progress of construction and ensure that professional certification has been received.
The fee structure within the proposed Bylaw has not been changed or amended since 1998 and
requires updating to meet the actual cost of providing the service. However, at this time the
main focus is on brining in the new legislation governing the permitting process and therefore
staff will bring a further report back to Council recommending amendments to the fee structure.
Since the adoption of our current Building Bylaw 6180 – 2003 the Province has implemented
the new BC Safety Standards Act and Regulations. The Draft Bylaw has been crafted with
4.3
Page 2 of 2
appropriate references to that Act and Regulations relating to Gas and Electrical Safety
Standards that we are mandated to deliver to our citizens.
The Sewerage regulation has also come into effect since the adoption of the current Building
Bylaw and the Draft Building Bylaw makes appropriate references to that regulation.
The current BC Building Code was adopted at the end of December 2006 and the Draft Building
Bylaw has been written to incorporate revised design data specifically determined appropriate
for our municipality. The Bylaw has also been amended to reflect the ongoing changes to the BC
Building Code that have occurred since it adoption by the province including amendments that
deal with solar ready heating requirements in all new construction.
b) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The revisions incorporated within the Draft Building Bylaw have been discussed at our Builders
Forums. However, the base rate charges for all permit fees have not been reviewed since 1998.
This review will be the subject of a future report.
CONCLUSIONS:
The attached Building Bylaw has been prepared to clearly outline the roles and responsibilities
of all parties involved in the building construction process. The majority of the changes are
“housekeeping” amendments. The proposed Bylaw will ensure the District continues to require
that all the aspects of construction that relate to health, safety and the protection of persons
and property be carried on in an appropriate manner as specified in the new Building Bylaw. The
permit fee structure within the proposed Bylaw has not been changed.
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: E. S. (Liz) Holitzki
Director: Licences, Permits and Bylaws
___________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
General Manager, Public Works & Development Services
____________________________________________
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Office
H/jd L
"Original signed by E.S. (Liz) Holitzki"
"Original signed by Frank Quinn"
"Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
Appendix I
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
Building Bylaw No.6925 -2012
A Bylaw to regulate the Construction, alteratio n, repair, demolition or moving of
buildings and Structures and the installation,alteration or repair of plumbing,
electrical working and equipment and gas piping, fittings and appliances in the
Municipality of Maple Ridge
WHEREAS section 692 (1) and (2) of the Local Government Act authorizes the Corporation of the
District of Maple Ridge, for the health, safety and protection of persons and property to regulate the
Construction, alteration, repair, or demolition of buildings and Structures by bylaw;
AND WHEREAS the Province of British Columbia has adopted a building code to govern standards in
respect of the Construction, alteration, repair and demolition of buildings in municipalities and
regional districts in the Province;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed necessary to provide for the administration of the building code;
NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting
assembled, enacts as follows:
1.Citation
This bylaw be cited as the “Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No.6925 -2012” and;
That “Maple Ridge Building Bylaw No. 6180 –2003” as amended be repealed in its entirety.
2.Definitions
In this bylaw:
The following words and terms have the meanings set out in the current edition of the British
Columbia Building Code:assembly occupancy,Building,Building area,Building height,business and
personal services occupancy,care or detention occupancy,Constructor,coordinating registered
professional,designer,field review,high hazard industrial occupancy,industrial occupancy,low
hazard industrial occupancy,major occupancy,mercantile occupancy,medium hazard industrial
occupancy,occupancy,owner,plumbing system,registered professional,registered professional of
record,and residential occupancy. The following term has the same meaning as set out under
Section 55 of the Community Charter:Qualified Professional
The words and terms in Bold below have the following meanings:
“Accessory Building”means a Building which is customarily incidental, subordinate and
exclusively devoted to the uses contained within the principal Building;
“Agent”means a person appointed as an agent in writing by the owner of the Premises
authorizing such person to make application for a Building Permit or Occupancy Permit
pursuant to this Bylaw and to act for the Owner pursuant to this Bylaw;
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 2 of 45
“B.C. Gas Safety Code”means the standards of the Canadian Gas Association and
amendments thereto as adopted by the B.C. Safety Standards Act and Gas Safety
Regulation pursuant thereto;
“Building Code”means the British Columbia Building Code current edition as adopted by the
Minister pursuant to section 692 (1) of the Local Government Act, as amended or re -
enacted from time to time.
“Building Official”includes The Chief Building Official, Building Inspectors, Gas/Plumbing
Inspectors, Electrical Inspectors, Trades Inspectors, Safety Officers and Plan Checkers
designated by the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge.
"CC"-means the Community Charter [SBC 2003] Chapter 26 as amended or re-enacted from
time to time.
“Chief Building Official”is the Manager of Inspection Services / Local Safety Manager and
includes those Building Officials as designated by the Manager of Inspection Services
and the Director of Licensing, Permits and Bylaws.
“Complex Building”means:
2.1 all Buildings used for major occupancies classified as
2.1.1 assembly occupancies,
2.1.2 care or detention occupancies ,
2.1.3 high hazard industrial occupancies, and
2.2 all Buildings exceeding 600 square metres in Building area or exceeding three
storeys in Building height used for major occupancies classified as
2.2.1 residential occupancies,
2.2.2 business and personal services occupancies ,
2.2.3 mercantile occupancies,
2.2.4 medium and low hazard industrial occupancies;
“Construct”includes erect, install, replace, alter, enlarge, demolish, repair or move and any
excavation (excavation as defined in the B.C.Building Code);
“Construction”means the erection alteration, replacement, addition, removal, moving and
demolition of Buildings,Structures and of all appurtenances thereto including without
limitation,Plumbing, sewer, drainage, septic, heating, air conditioning, electrical, gas, oil
and other systems, fittings, appliances and accessories of every nature and kind, and
includes all site preparation, excavation, filling and grading;
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 3 of 45
“Corporation”means the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge;
“Council”means the Municipal Council of the Corporation;
“Electrical Code”means all those parts of the current Canadian Electrical Code CSA Standard
C22.1-02 including errata forming the B.C.Electrical Code and Electrical Safety
Regulation enacted by the B.C. Safety Standards Act;
“Electrical Equipment”means Electrical Equipment as defined in the Electrical Code;
“Gas Equipment”shall have the same meaning as that term defined in the Gas Safety
Regulation forming part of the BC Safety Standards Act;
“Health and Safety Aspects of The Work”means design and Construction regulated by Part 3,
Part 4, and sections 9.1, 9.4,9.5, 9.8, 9.9, 9.10, 9.12, 9.14, 9.15, 9.17, 9.18, 9.20,
9.21, 9.22, 9.23, 9.24, 9.31, 9.32, and 9.35 of Part 9 of the Building Code;
“Non Inhabitable”means an accessory residential Building which has no cooking, or kitchen
counter/cupboard facilities,bathing, or sleeping facilities and which is used solely as an
Accessory Building for storage or work shop purposes;
“Permit”includes a Building Permit, Occupancy Permit, Gas Permit,Plumbing Permit, Electrical
Permit and all other Permits required by this Bylaw;
“Plumbing”means any system or arrangement of one or more pipes, including fittings and
appliances attached thereto, in or upon any Premises, installed for the purpose of
supplying such Premises with potable water or for the conducting or carrying away of
waste water or of rain or surface water, including any required vent pipes and including
sprinkler systems and irrigation systems;
“Pond”-means any manufactured or constructed body of water of any size, which is installed
as a landscaping feature and is not intended for the purposes of swimming bathing or
human occupation.
“Pool”means any manufactured or constructed swimming Pool having the capacity to contain
water at a depth exceeding 450mm or with a water surface area exceeding 14 square
metres. A Pool includes any fence or other enclosing Structure, all Plumbing and
appurtenances necessary or convenient to the use of the Pool, but does not include self-
contained hot tubs with a locking co ver;
“Premises”includes any parcel of land together with all Buildings or Structures located
thereon;
“Simple Building”means Buildings of three storeys or less in Building height, having a Building
area not exceeding 600 square metres and used for major occupancies classified as
2.3 residential occupancies,
2.4 business and personal services occupancies ,
2.5 mercantile occupancies, or
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 4 of 45
2.6 medium and low hazard industrial occupancies;
“Structure”means a Construction or portion thereof of any kind, whether fixed to, supported by
or sunk into land or water, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes any
pad or base of concrete, asphalt or other material designed to support or actually
supporting a mobile home; but specifically excludes landscaping, paving, decks less than
0.5 metres in height with no roofs and retaining Structures less than 0.5 metres in
height;
“Temporary”means a period of time not exceeding 12 months;
“Temporary Building”means a Building that has been granted approval for a fixed and limited
time not exceeding the expiration date of the authorizing Building Permit;
“Temporary Residential Use”means a temporary dwelling unit for the accommodation of a
relative of the property Owner.
3.Purpose of Bylaw
3.1 This bylaw, shall, notwithstanding any other provision herein, be interpreted in
accordance with this section.
3.2 This bylaw is enacted and retained for the purpose of regulating Construction within
the Corporation in the general public interest. The activities undertaken by or on
behalf of the Corporation pursuant to this bylaw are for the sole purpose of providing
a limited spot check for health, safety and the protection of persons and property. It
is not contemplated nor intended, nor does the purpose of this bylaw extend:
3.2.1 to the protection of owners, owner/builders or Constructors from economic
loss;
3.2.2 to the assumption by the Corporation of any responsibility for ensuring the
compliance by any owners, his or her representatives or any employees,
Constructors or designers retained by him or her, with the Building Code, the
requirements of this bylaw or any other applicable codes or standards;
3.2.3 to providing any person a warranty of design or workmanship with respe ct to
any Building or Structure for which a permit or occupancy permit is issued
under this bylaw;
3.2.4 to providing a warranty or assurance that Construction undertaken pursuant
to permits issued by the Corporation is free from latent, or any defects.
4.Permit Conditions
4.1 A permit is required whenever work regulated under this bylaw is to be undertaken.
4.2 Neither the issuance of a permit under this bylaw nor the acceptance or review of
plans, drawings or specifications or supporting documents, nor any inspections made
by or on behalf of the Corporation shall in any way relieve the owner or his or her
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 5 of 45
representatives from full and sole responsibility to perform the work in strict
accordance with the Building Code,this bylaw and all other codes, standards and
applicable enactments.
4.3 It shall be the full and sole responsibility of the owner (and where the owner is acting
through a representative, the representative) to carry out the work in respect of which
the permit was issued in compliance with the Building Code,this bylaw and all other
applicable codes, standards and enactments.
4.4 Neither the issuance of a permit under this bylaw, the review and acceptance of the
design, drawings, plans or specifications, nor inspections made by a Building Official,
shall constitute a representation or warranty that the Building Code or the bylaw have
been complied with or the Building or Structure meets any standard of materials or
workmanship, and no person shall rely on any of those acts as establishing
compliance with the Building Code or this bylaw or any standard of Construction.
5.Scope and Exemptions
5.1 This bylaw applies to the design,Construction and occupancy of new Buildings and
Structures, and the alteration, re-Construction, demolition, removal, relocation and
occupancy of existing Buildings and Structures.
5.2 This bylaw does not apply to Buildings or Structures exempted by Division A -Part 1
of the Building Code except as expressly provided herein.
6.Prohibitions
6.1 No person shall commence or continue or suffer or permit the commencement or
continuance of any Construction, alteration, reconstruction, demolition,removal or
relocation of any Building or Structure, including excavation or other work related to
Construction unless a Building Official has issued a valid and subsisting permit for
the work.
6.2 No person shall demolish of suffer or permit the demolition of a Building or Structure
unless a Building Official has issued a valid and subsisting demolition permit for the
demolition.
6.3 No person shall move or suffer or permit the movement of a Building or Structure
unless a valid and subsisting moving permit has been issued by a Building Official for
the moving of the Building or Structure.
6.4 No person shall occupy or use or suffer or permit the occupancy or use of any
Building or Structure unless a valid and subsisting occupancy permit has been issued
by the Chief Building Official in accordance with sections 23.1 to 23.8 of this bylaw
for the Building or Structure, or contrary to the terms of any permit issued or any
notice given by the Chief Building Official.
6.5 No person shall or suffer or permit,unless authorized in writing by the Chief Building
Official, reverse, alter, deface, cover, remove or in any way tamper with any notice,
permit or certificate posted upon or affixed to a Building or Structure pursuant to this
bylaw.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 6 of 45
6.6 No person shall or suffer or permit any work that is substantially at variance with the
approved design, plans or specifications of a Building,Structure or other works for
which a permit has been issued, unless that variance has been accepted in writing by
a Building Official.
6.7 No person shall or suffer or permit the obstruction of the entry of a Building Official
or other authorized official of the Corporation on property in the administration of this
bylaw.
7.Building Officials
7.1 The Chief Building Official:
7.1.1 shall administer this bylaw;
7.1.2 shall keep records of permit applications,permits, notices and orders issued,
issues Permits for the purposes mentioned in this Bylaw, inspections and
tests made, and shall retain copies of all documents related to the
administration of this bylaw or microfilm copies of such documents, or retain
by any other acceptable means, copies of such documents;
7.1.3 may establish, if requested to do so, whether the methods or types of
Construction and types of materials used in the Construction of a Building or
Structure substantially conform to the requirements of the Building Code;
7.1.4 is designated Local Safety Manager for Electrical and Gas Safety Regulations
in accordance with the Safety Standards Act of BC, as amended;
7.1.5 may appoint Building Officials who shall be responsible to the Chief Building
Official and shall assist in the administration of this bylaw.
7.2 A Building Official:
7.2.1 may enter any land,Building or Premises at any reasonable time for the
purpose of ascertaining the terms of this bylaw are being observed;
7.2.2 shall, where any residence is occupied, obtain the consent of the occupant or
provide written notice to the occupant 24 hours in advance of entry; and
7.2.3 shall carry proper credentials confirming his or her status as a Building
Official.
7.3 A Building Official may order the correction of any work that is being or has been
done in contravention of this bylaw.
8.Applications
8.1 Every person shall apply for and obtain:
8.1.1 a permit before constructing, repairing or altering a Building,a Structure,
Plumbing works per Section 29, Gas works per Section 30, and/or Electrical
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 7 of 45
works per Section 31. A permit shall be in the form provided by the Chief
Building Official and, if applicable, to be in accordance with section 11.1 of
this bylaw. Each Building or Structure to be constructed on a site requires a
separate building permit and shall be assessed a separate building permit
fee based on the value of that Building or Structure as determined in
accordance with Appendix “A” to this bylaw;
8.1.2 a moving permit before moving a Building or Structure; A moving permit shall
be in the form provided by the Chief Building Official;
8.1.3 a demolition permit before demolishing a Building or Structure; A demolition
permit shall be in the form provided by the Chief Building Official;
8.1.4 a fireplace and chimney permit prior to the Construction of a masonry
fireplace or the installation of a wood burning appliance or chimney unless
the works are encompassed by a valid building permit.A fireplace and
chimney permit shall be in the form provided by the Chief Building Official.
8.2 Application Exceptions
Except as herein specifically provided, where a Building or Structure or any part
thereof has been constructed prior to the adoption of this Bylaw, such Building or
Structure or part thereof shall not be required to be altered to comply herewith:
8.2.1 Where a Building or Structure or any part thereof is demolished or removed,
this bylaw applies to any part of the Building or Structure which remains on
the Premises and to all Construction done in connection with the demolition
or removal thereof;
8.2.2 Where a Building or Structure or any part thereof is moved to a site within the
Municipality, this Bylaw applies to any part of the Building or Structure which
is moved and to all Construction done in connection with the relocation
thereof;
8.2.3 Where the class of occupancy or use, as defined in the Building Code, of a
Building or any part thereof is changed, this Bylaw applies to any part of the
Building affected by the change;
8.2.4 Where a Building is damaged by any cause to the extent of more than fifty
percent (50%) of its assessed value as shown on the last assessment roll
upon which such Building was assessed, this Bylaw applies to the whole of
the Building and to all Construction done in connection with the repairs
thereto, and where the Building damage by any cause is fifty percent (50%) or
less of the assessed value as shown on the last a ssessment roll upon which
such Building was assessed, the Bylaw is only applicable to the damaged
part;
8.2.5 Storage and garden sheds and other accessory Buildings not exceeding
10m2 in floor area may be erected without a Building Permit, but such
Buildings shall comply with the applicable portions of the Building Code, this
bylaw, all other bylaws of the Corporation, and any other applicable
enactment concerning safety;
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 8 of 45
8.2.6 Farm Buildings which are not used as dwellings shall comply with Part 1 of
the Canadian Farm Building Code current edition issued by the Associate
Committee on the National Building Code which is hereby adopted and made
a part of this Bylaw, and with all other applicable provisions of this Bylaw, all
other Bylaws of the Corporation and any other applicable enactment
concerning safety.
8.3 Certified Geotechnical Report for Applications
8.3.1 If the Chief Building Official considers that Construction would be on land that
is subject to or is likely to be subject to flooding, mud flows, debris flows,
debris torrents, erosion, land slip, rockfalls, subsidence or avalanche, the
Building Official may require the owner of land to provide the Chief Building
Official with a report certified by a professional engineer with experience in
geotechnical engineering that the land may be used safely for the use
intended.
8.3.2 Should the lands be of sufficient complexity the Chief Building Official may
require a third party review of the aforementioned report. The costs incurred
for this report will be born solely by applicant.
8.3.3 If a professional engineer with experience in geotechnical engineering
determines that land may not be used safely for the use intended, the Chief
Building Official must refuse to issue a building permit.
8.3.3.1 the Chief Building Official may issue a building permit in accordance
with 8.3.3 if a professional engineer with experience in geotechnical
engineering determines and certifies that the land may be used safely
for the use intended if the land is used in accordance with the
conditions specified in the professional’s report
8.3.4 A building permit under 8.3.2 may only be issued on the following conditions:
8.3.4.1 the owner of the land covenants with the munici pality to use the land
only in the manner determined and certified by the engineer as
enabling the safe use of the land for the use intended,
8.3.4.2 the covenant contains conditions respecting reimbursement by the
covenanter for any expenses that may be incurre d by the covenantee
as a result of a breach of a covenant under paragraph (a), and
8.3.4.3 the covenant be registered under section 219 of the Land Title Act.
8.4 Private Wells and Septic Systems
8.4.1 Except as hereinafter specifically provided, no Building Permit shall be issued
for the Construction of any Building where the property on which the
proposed Building is to be located has not been occupied during the previous
12 month period and is not served by a community water system until, a
certificate of well water quantity and potability in the form provided by the
Chief Building Official, certifying that the well or wells on the Premises will be
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 9 of 45
capable of supplying at least 2,250 litres of potable water per day per
dwelling unit on a year round basis, has been submitted to the Chief Building
Official.
8.4.2 Where a certificate of well water quantity has been executed by a
Professional Engineer certifying that the well or wells on the Premises will be
capable of supplying at least 2,250 litres of water per day per dwelling unit
on a year round basis, the Chief Building Official may issue a Building Permit
prior to receiving a certificate of well water potability provided that the
applicant enters into an agreement with the Corporation to install any water
treatment system necessary to render the well water potable to the
satisfaction of the Authorizing Officer as designated by the Health Authori ty
prior to the occupancy of the Building and, as security for the carrying out of
the said agreement, deposits with the Corporation, in the form of cash, term
deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a financial institute
acceptable to the Corporation, a sum equal to the estimated cost of installing
the water treatment system but in no case shall be less than Five Thousand
Dollars per well ($5,000).
8.4.3 This Section does not apply where a proposed new Building is to replace an
existing Building on the same Premises and where there is an existing proven
source of potable ground water yielding 2,250 litres per day on a year round
basis.
8.4.4 Except as hereinafter specifically provided, no Building Permit shall be issued
for the Construction of any Building where the Premises on which the
proposed Building is to be located is not served by a public sanitary sewer
system until a filing has been received by the Health Authority for the
installation of a septic sewage disposal system. Confirmation is required to
be submitted to the Chief Building Official by an “Authorized Person”, as
defined in the Sewerage System Regulation of BC -relating to small building
additions and accessory buildings -has provided written assurances that the
Construction is not impacting on the existing septic sewage disposal system.
8.4.5 Where an alternate method of sewage disposal is required due to soil
conditions and where a filing has been registered at the Health Authority to
allow Construction to proceed prior to the installation of the alternate sewage
disposal system, the Chief Building Official may issue a Building Permit prior
to the installation of the alternate sewage disposal system provided that the
applicant enters into an agreement with the Corporation assuring that the
alternate sewage system shall be installed in accordance with the filing made
at the Health Authority, prior to the occupancy of the Building and, as security
for the carrying out of the said agreement, deposits with the Corporation, in
the form of cash, term deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a
financial institute acceptable to the Corporation, a sum equal to the
estimated cost of installing the alternate sewage disposal system but in no
case shall be less than Five Tho usand Dollars ($5,000) minimum.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 10 of 45
9.Applications for Complex Buildings
9.1 An application for a building permit with respect to a Complex Building shall;
9.1.1 be made in the form provided by the Chief Building Official, signed by the
owner, or a signing officer if the owner is a corporation, and the coordinating
registered professional;
9.1.2 be accompanied by the owner’s acknowledgment of responsibility and
undertakings made in the form provided by the Chief Building Official, signed
by the owner, or a signing officer if the owner is a corporation;
9.1.3 include a site plan showing:
9.1.3.1 the bearing and dimensions of the parcel taken from the registered
subdivision plan;
9.1.3.2 the legal description and civic address of the parcel;
9.1.3.3 the location and dimensions of all statutory rights of way, easements
and setback requirements;
9.1.3.4 the location and dimensions of all existing and proposed Buildings or
Structures on the parcel;
9.1.3.5 setbacks to the natural boundary of any lake, swamp, pond or
watercourse where the Corporation‘s land use regulations establish
siting requirements related to flooding;
9.1.3.6 the existing and finished ground levels to an established datum at or
adjacent to the site and the geodetic elevation of the underside of the
floor system of a Building or Structure where the Corporation of the
District of Maple Ridge’s land use regulations establish siting
requirements related to minimum floor elevation; and
9.1.3.7 the location, dimension and gradient of parking and driveway access;
9.1.4 include floor plans showing the dimensions, heights and uses of all areas:
the dimensions and height of crawl and roof spaces; the location, size and
swing of doors; the location, size and opening of windows; floor, wall, and
ceiling finishes;Plumbing fixtures; structural elements;and stair dimensions.
9.1.5 include a cross section through the Building or Structure illustrating
foundations, drainage, ceiling heights and Construction systems;
9.1.6 include elevations of all sides of the Building or Structure showing finish
details, roof slopes, windows, doors, proposed and finished grades at and
beyond the building face to provide an accurate representation of finished
grade levels and their impact on building elements and access points;
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 11 of 45
9.1.7 include cross-sectional details drawn at an appropriate scale and at sufficient
locations to illustrate that the Building or Structure substantially conforms to
the Building Code;
9.1.8 include copies of approvals required under any enactment relating to health
or safety, including, without limitation, sewage dispos al permits, highway
access permits and Health Authority approval;
9.1.9 include a letter of assurance in the form as provided in Division C -Part 2 of
the Building Code, signed by the owner, or a signing officer of the owner if the
owner is a corporation, and the coordinating registered professional.
9.1.10 include letters of assurance in the form provided in Division C -Part 2 of the
current edition of the Building Code, each signed by such registered
professionals of record as the Building Official or Building Code may require
to prepare the design for and conduct field reviews of the Construction of the
Building or Structure;
9.1.11 include two copies of specifications and three sets of drawings at a scale of
¼”:1’-0”, 1:50, or another suitable scale of the design prepared by each
registered professional of record and including the information set out in
sections 9.1.4 –9.1.7 of this bylaw;
9.1.12 may require structural drawings sealed by a Qualified Professional as
provided for under Section 55 (1)(d) of the CC for all new construction or
additions to existing buildings;
9.2 In addition to the requirements of section 9.1, the following may be required by a
Building Official to be submitted with a building permit application for the
Construction of a Complex Building where the complexity of the proposed Building or
Structure or siting circumstances warrant:
9.2.1 site servicing drawings, including sufficient detail of off -site services to
indicate locations at the property line, prepared and sealed by a registered
professional, in accordance with the Corporation’s subdivision servicing
bylaw;
9.2.2 a section through the site showing grades,Buildings,Structures, parking
areas and driveways;
9.2.3 any other information required by the Building Official or the Building Code to
establish substantial compliance with this bylaw, the Building Code and other
bylaws and enactments relating to the Building or Structure.
10.Applications for Simple Buildings
10.1 An application for a building permit with respect to a Simple Building shall;
10.1.1 be in the form provided by the Chief Building Official, signed by the owner, or
a signing officer if the owner is a corporation;
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 12 of 45
10.1.2 be accompanied by the owner’s acknowledgment of responsibility and
undertakings made in the form provided by the Chief Building Official, signed
by the owner, or a signing officer if the owner is a corporation;
10.1.3 include a site plan showing:
10.1.3.1 the bearing and dimensions of the parcel taken from the registered
subdivision plan;
10.1.3.2 the legal description and civic address of the parcel;
10.1.3.3 the location and dimensions of all statutory rights of way,
easements and setback requirements;
10.1.3.4 the location and dimensions of all existing and proposed Buildings
or Structures on the parcel;
10.1.3.5 setbacks to the natural boundary of any lake, swamp, pond or
watercourse where the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge’s
land use regulations establish siting requirements related to
flooding;
10.1.3.6 the existing and finished ground levels to an established datum at
or adjacent to the site and the geodetic elevation of the underside
of the floor system of a Building or Structure where the Corporation
of the District of Maple Ridge’s land use regulations establish siting
requirements related to minimum floor elevation; and
10.1.3.7 the location, dimension and gradient of parking and driveway
access;
10.1.3.8 the comprehensive lot grading required to establish Building or
Structure height compliance with the District of Maple Ridge’s
Zoning Bylaw;
10.1.4 include floor plans showing the dimensions, heights and uses of all areas: the
dimensions and height of crawl and roof spaces; the location, size and swing
of doors; the location, size and opening of windows; floor, wall, and ceiling
finishes;Plumbing fixtures; structural elements; and stair dimensions.
10.1.5 include a cross section through the Building or Structure illustrating
foundations, drainage, ceiling heights and Construction systems;
10.1.6 include elevations of all sides of the Building or Structure showing finish
details, roof slopes, windows, doors, proposed and finished grades at and
beyond the building face to provide an accurate representation of finished
grade levels and their impact on building elements and access points;
10.1.7 include cross-sectional details drawn at an appropriate scale and at sufficient
locations to illustrate that the Building or Structure substantially conforms to
the Building Code;
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 13 of 45
10.1.8 include copies of approvals required under any enactment relating to health
or safety, including, without limitation, sewage disposal permits, highway
access permits and Health Authority a pproval;
10.1.9 include a foundation design prepared by a registered professional in
accordance with Part 4 of the Building Code, accompanied by letters of
assurance in the form provided in Division C -Part 2 of the current edition of
the Building Code, signed by the registered professional of record, unless;
10.1.9.1 the requirements of section 10.1.9 are waived by a Building Official
because the Building Official required a professional engineer’s
report pursuant to section 56 of the CC and the building permit is
issued in accordance with section 56 of the CC, (see section 8.3)
or;
10.1.9.2 documentation, prepared and sealed by a registered professional,
is provided certifying that the foundation design substantially
complies with section 9.4.4 of Part 9 the Building Code and the
foundation excavation substantially complies with section 9.12 of
Part 9 of the Building Code.
10.1.10 include two copies of specifications and two sets of drawings at a scale of
¼”: 1’-0”, 1:50, or another suitable scale of the design including the
information set out in sections 10.1.4 to 10.1.9 of this bylaw.
10.2 In addition to the requirements of section 10.1, every new dwelling of residential
occupancy must be constructed with the ability to install a solar domestic hot water
heating system. The current “Solar Hot Water Ready Regulation” as amended, is
hereby adopted and form part of this Bylaw. Construction pursuant to this regulation
shall follow the form as prescribed in Appendix B of this bylaw.
10.3 In addition to the requirements of section 10.1, the following may be required by a
Building Official to be submitted with a building permit application for the
Construction of a Simple Building where the project involves two or more buildings,
which in the aggregate total more than 1000 square metres of building area, or two
or more buildings that will contain four or more dwelling units, or otherwise where the
complexity of the proposed Building or Structure or siting circumstances warrant:
10.3.1 site servicing drawings, including s ufficient detail of off-site services to
indicate locations at the property line, prepared and sealed by a registered
professional, in accordance with the Corporation of the District of Maple
Ridge’s subdivision servicing bylaw;
10.3.2 a section through the site showing grades,Buildings,Structures, parking
areas and driveways;
10.3.3 a roof plan and roof height calculations;
10.3.4 structural, electrical, mechanical or fire suppression drawings prepared and
sealed by a registered professional;
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 14 of 45
10.3.5 letters of assurance in the form provided in Division C -Part 2 of the current
edition of the Building Code, signed by the registered professional of record ;
10.3.6 any other information required by the Building Official,Building Code, B.C.
Safety Standards Act including the B.C. Gas Safety Regulation and Code or
the Electrical Safety Regulation and Code to establish substantial compliance
with this bylaw, the Building Code and other bylaws and enactments relating
to the Building or Structure.
10.4 In addition to the requirements of section 1 0.1, the following shall be required by a
Building Official to be submitted with a building permit application for the
Construction of a Simple Building where the project involves an infill lot in an already
established subdivision:
10.4.1 include a current posting and topographic survey of the land prepared by a
land surveyor registered in the Province of B.C.,
10.4.2 include invert elevations of the municipal connections at the property line
and establish the minimum building elevation to ensure gravity feed of the
storm and sanitary sewers to the municipal connections. Should storm
outfall be to a ditch then invert elevation is to be 250mm from crest of ditch
or as determined by the Municipal Engineer.
11.Professional Plan Certification
11.1 The letters of assurance in the form provided in Division C -Part 2 of the current
edition of the Building Code. and provided pursuant to sections 9.1.10, 10.1.9,
10.3.5, and 19.1 of this bylaw are relied upon by the Corporation and its Building
Officials as certification that the design and plans to which the letters of assurance
relate comply with the Building Code and other applicable enactments relating to
safety.
11.2 A building permit issued for the Construction of a Complex Building, or for a Simple
Building for which a Building Official required professional design pursuant to section
10.3.4 and letters of assurance pursuant to section 10.3.5 of this bylaw, shall be in
the form provided by the Chief Building Official.
11.3 A building Permit issued pursuant to section 11.1 of this bylaw shall include a notice
to the owner that the building Permit is issued in reliance upon the certification of the
registered professionals of record that the design and plans submitted in support of
the application for the building Permit comply with the Building Code and other
applicable enactments relating to safety.
11.4 When a building permit is issued in accordance with section 11.1 of this bylaw the
permit fee shall be reduced by 5% of the fees payable pursuan t to Appendix “A” to
this bylaw, up to a maximum reduction of $500.00 (five hundred dollars).
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 15 of 45
12.Fees and Charges
12.1 In addition to applicable fees and charges required under other bylaws, a permit fee,
calculated in accordance with Appendix “A”, “D”, “E”and “F” to this bylaw, shall be
paid in full upon issuance of any permit under this bylaw.
12.2 The appropriate plan-processing fee as set out in Appendix “A”, “D”, “E” and “F” shall
accompany an application made for a permit to this bylaw.
12.3 Where, due to non-compliance with this bylaw, more than two inspections are
necessary when one inspection is normally required, for each inspection after the
second inspection, a re-inspection fee as set out in Appendix “A”, “D”, “E” and “F” to
this bylaw shall be paid prior to additional inspections being performed.
12.4 Where a required permit inspection is requested to be done after the hours during
which the offices of the Corporation are normally open, an inspection charge shall be
payable based on the time actually spe nt in making such inspection, including travel
time, as set out in Appendix “A”, “D”, “E” and “F” to this bylaw.
12.5 The fees as set out in Appendix "A", "D", "E" and "F" to this bylaw shall be adjusted
annually and implemented on the 15th day of January in t he following year. This
annual adjustment shall be based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI)-as established
by Statistics Canada -based on the previous 12 month period ending December.
13.Building Permits
13.1 When:
13.1.1 a completed application in compliance with section 9 or 10 of this bylaw,
including all required supporting documentation has been submitted;
13.1.2 the owner or his or her representative has paid all applicable fees set out in
12.1 of this bylaw;
13.1.3 the owner or his or her representative has paid all charges and met all
requirements imposed by any other statute or bylaw;
13.1.4 no covenant, agreement, or regulation of the Corporation authorizes the
permit to be withheld;
a Building Official shall issue the permit for which the application is made.
13.2 When the application is in respect of a Building that includes, or will include, a
residential occupancy, the building permit must not be issued unless the owner
provides evidence pursuant to section 30 (1) of the Home Owner Protection Act, SBC
1998 Chapter 31, and amendments thereto, that the proposed Building:
13.2.1 is covered by home warranty insurance, and
13.2.2 the Constructor is a licensed residential builder.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 16 of 45
13.3 Section 13.2 of this bylaw does not apply if the Owner is not required to be licensed
and to obtain home warranty insurance in accordance with sections 20 (1) or 30 (1)
of the Home Owner Protection Act, SBC 1998 Chapter 31, and amendments thereto.
14.Change of Plans:
14.1 The plans and specifications for any Building,Structure,Plumbing,Electrical
Equipment or gas Construction for which a Building Permit,Plumbing Permit,
Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit has been issued shall not be altered unless such
alteration is approved in writing by the Chief Building Official.
14.2 No person shall do any Construction that is at variance with the description, plans
and specifications submitted with the application for a Building Permit,Plumbing
Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit which has been issued pursuant to this
Bylaw, unless such change has been approved in writing by the Chief Building
Official.
15.Revocation of Permit:
15.1 Where an applicant fails to obtain or provide the necessary documentation to
complete a Building Permit,Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit
within 60 calendar days of being notified that the same is ready for issuance or in
need of additional information, unless an extension has been granted by the Chief
Building Official, the application shall be deemed null and void and any fees paid in
respect of such application shall be forfeited and any documentation submitted may
be destroyed.
15.2 Every Building Permit,Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit is issued
subject to the following conditions:
15.2.1 the Construction shall commence within 6 months from the date the
Building Permit,Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit is
issued;
15.2.2 the Construction shall not be discontinued or suspended for a period in
excess of 12 months;
15.2.3 the Construction shall be completed within 24 months from the date the
Building Permit,Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit is
issued; and
15.2.4 In the event that any conditions in clauses 15.2.1, 15.2.2 or 15.2.3 of this
subsection are breached, the Building Permit,Plumbing Permit, Electrical
Permit and or Gas Permit authorizing the Construction shall forthwith expire
and shall be without force and effect.
15.3 The Chief Building Official may revoke a Building Permit,Plumbing Permit, Electrical
Permit and or Gas Permit if;
15.3.1 there is a contravention of any condition under which that Building Permit,
Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit was issued;
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 17 of 45
15.3.2 the Building Permit,Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit
was issued on the basis of incorrect information provided by the owner, his
agent, his contractor or a Registered Professional; or
15.3.3 there is a violation of this Bylaw or other relevant Bylaws and any other
applicable enactment concerning safety.
16.Permit Fee Refund
16.1 Where an Owner or his agent applies in writing for the cancellation of a Building
Permit,Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit issued under this
Bylaw, 75% of any Permit fee paid in excess of $150.00 may be refunded to the
holder of the Permit, provided;
16.1.1 the Building Permit,Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit
had not expired at the time the application for cancellation was received;
and
16.1.2 no Construction had commenced under that Building Permit,Plumbing
Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit.
17.Permit Transfer and Limitations
17.1 No Building Permit,Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit issued
pursuant to this Bylaw shall be transferred or assigned until the holder of the
Building Permit,Plumbing Permit, Electrical Permit and or Gas Permit has received
in writing:
17.1.1 approval from the Chief Building Official for the transfer or assignment; and
17.1.2 has paid the prescribed transfer fee as set out in Schedules “A, D, E, & F”
hereto.
17.2 A Building Official may extend the period of time set out under sections 15.2.1 and
15.2.2 where Construction has not been commenced or has been discontinued due
to adverse weather, strikes, material or labour shortages, or similar hardship beyond
the owner’s control.
17.3 A Building Official may issue a foundation permit in the form provided by the Chief
Building Official, prior to the issuance of a building permit.
17.4 A Building Official may issue a building permit for a portion of a Building or Structure
before the design, plans and specifications for the entire Building or Structure have
been accepted, provided sufficient information has been provided to the Corporation
to demonstrate to the Building Official that the portion authorized to be constructed
substantially complies with this and other applicable bylaws and the permit fee
applicable to that portion of the Building or Structure has been paid. The issuance of
the permit notwithstanding, the requirements of this bylaw apply to the remainder of
the Building or Structure as if the permit for the portion of the Building or Structure
had not been issued.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 18 of 45
17.5 When a site has been excavated under a foundation permit issued pursuant to
section 17.3 of this bylaw and a building permit is not subsequently issued or a
subsisting building permit has expired in accordance with the requirements of
section 15.2, but without the Construction of the Building or Structure for which the
building permit was issued having commenced, the owner shall fill in the excavation
to restore the original gradients of the site within 60 days of being served notice by
the Corporation to do so.
18.Disclaimer of Warranty or Representation
18.1 Neither the issuance of a permit under this bylaw, the review and acceptance of the
design, drawings, plans or specifications, nor inspections made by a Building Official,
shall constitute a representation or warranty that the Building Code or the bylaw have
been complied with or the Building or Structure meets any standard of materials or
workmanship, and no person shall rely on any of those acts as establishing
compliance with the Building Code or this bylaw or any standard of Construction.
19.Professional Design and Field Review
19.2 When a Building Official considers that the site conditions, size or complexity of a
development or an aspect of a development warrant, he or she may require a
registered professional to provide design and plan certification and field review
supported by letters of assurance in the form provided in Division C -Part 2 of the
current edition of the Building Code.
19.3 Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for a Complex Building, or Simple
Building in circumstances where letters of assurance have been required in
accordance with sections 10.1.9, 10.3.5, or 19.1 of this bylaw, the owner shall
provide the Corporation with letters of assurance in the form provided in Division C -
Part 2 of the current edition of the Building Code.
19.4 When a registered professional provides letters of assurance in accordance with
sections 9.1.10, 10.1.9, 10.3.5, or 19.2 of this bylaw, he or she shall also provide
proof of professional liability insurance to the Building Official in the form provided by
the Chief Building Official, except that proof of professional liability insurance in
respect of building envelope matters need not be provided if the owner grant to the
Corporation a covenant registerable under Section 219 of the Land Title Act requiring
that the building envelope, in respect of which the registered professional of record
has provided design or field review services, be monitored, maintained and repaired
in accordance with the recommendations of the registered professional of record as
set out in the covenant, and containing a full release and indemnity of this
Corporation in respect of claims of any nature arising from any defect in design,
installation or performance of the building envelope.
20.Responsibilities of the Owner
20.1 Every owner shall ensure that all Construction complies with the Building Code,B.C.
Safety Standards Act referencing the Gas Safety Regulation and Code and the
Electrical Safety Regulation and Code,this bylaw, other Municipal Bylaws and other
applicable enactments respecting safety.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 19 of 45
20.2 Every owner to whom a permit is issued shall be responsible for the cost of repair of
any damage to municipal works and property that occurs in the course of the work
authorized by the permit. (see Section 22)
20.3 Every owner to whom a permit is issued shall, during Construction:
20.3.1 keep a copy of the accepted designs, plans and specifications on the
property and keep inspection records in a conspicuous place
20.3.2 post the civic address on the property in a location visible from any adjoining
streets.
21.Surveyor's Certificate
21.1 Where the market value of a proposed Building will exceed $1,000.00 and such
Building is being constructed or will be constructed upon a concrete foundation or
pad, the Chief Building Official may require that the applicant submit a Surveyor's
Certificate showing the geodetic elevations of the forms and the location of the forms
in relation to the boundaries of the parcel upon which the Building is being or will be
constructed. An original copy of this certificate is required to be presented to the
Building Official on site at the time of the inspection.
21.2 No Building or Structure shall be constructed on any parcel in such a manner that it
encroaches upon any adjoining parcels or crosses any par cel boundary.
22.Inspections
22.2 When a registered professional provides letters of assurance in accordance with
sections 9.1.9, 10.1.9, 10.3.5, or 19.2 of this bylaw, the Corporation will rely solely
on field reviews undertaken by the registered professional of record and the letters of
assurance submitted pursuant to section 19.2 of this bylaw as certification that the
Construction substantially conforms to the design, plans and specifications and that
the Construction complies with the Building Code, this bylaw and other applicable
enactments respecting safety.
22.3 Notwithstanding section 22.1 of this bylaw, a Building Official may attend the site
from time to time during the course of Construction to ascertain that the field reviews
are taking place and to monitor the field reviews undertaken by the registered
professionals of record.
22.4 A Building Official may attend periodically at the site of the Construction of simple
Buildings or Structures to ascertain whether the health and safety aspects of the
work are being carried out in substantial conformance with the applicable portions of
the Building Code, this bylaw and any other applicable enactment concerning safety.
Building
22.5 The owner, or there representative, shall give at least 24 hours notice to the
Corporation when requesting an inspection and shall obtain an inspection and
receive a Building Official’s acceptance of the following aspects of the work prior to
concealing them:
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 20 of 45
22.5.1 the foundation and footing forms, before concrete is poured;
22.5.2 installation of perimeter drain tiles and damp-proofing, prior to backfilling;
22.5.3 the preparation of ground, including ground cover, when required, prior to the
placing of a concrete slab;
22.5.4 rough-in of factory built chimneys and fireplaces and solid fuel burning
appliances;
22.5.5 the framing and sheathing;
22.5.6 installation of rain screen;
22.5.7 installation of backing board prior to the installation of cultured stone or
stucco;
22.5.8 installation of insulation and vapour barrier;
22.5.9 the health and safety aspects of the work when the Building or Structure is
substantially complete and ready for but prior to occupancy.
22.6 No aspect of the work referred in section 22.4.1 -8 of this bylaw shall be concealed
until a Building Official has accepted it in writing.
22.7 The requirements of section 22.4.2 -9 of this bylaw do not apply to any aspect of the
work that is the subject of a registered professional of records letter of assurance
provided in accordance with sections 9.1.10, 10.1.9, 10.3.5, paragraph 19.1 and
19.2 of this bylaw.
Electrical
22.8 The holder of an electrical permit shall give at least 24 hours notice (contractors via
declaration only) to the Corporation when requesting an inspection and shall obtain
an inspection and receive an Electrical Safety Officer’s acceptance of the following
aspects of the electrical work prior to concealing them.
22.8.1 after all underground electrical Construction is complete, but prior to the
placing of any concrete or backfill;
22.8.2 after electrical rough-in wiring but prior to framing;
22.8.3 electrical final inspection must be performed prior to the final Building
inspection,
Plumbing
22.9 The holder of a plumbing permit shall give at least 24 hours notice to the Corporation
when requesting an inspection and shall obtain an inspection and receiv e a building
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 21 of 45
official’s acceptance of the following aspects of the plumbing work prior to
concealing them.
22.9.1 after the installation of foundation drains, dampproofing and drain rock,
sanitary sewer lines, storm sewer lines, water lines, sumps and storm water
infiltration systems is complete, but prior to the backfilling of foundations;
22.9.2 after all underground Plumbing Construction is complete, but prior to the
placing of any concrete or backfill;
22.9.3 after the installation of in slab radiant heat piping wher e required, but prior to
the pouring of concrete slabs;
22.9.4 after Plumbing rough-in, but prior to framing;
22.9.5 Plumbing final inspection must be performed prior to the final Building
inspection,
Gas
22.10 The holder of a gas permit shall give at least 24 hours notice to the Corporation when
requesting an inspection and shall obtain an inspection and receive a Gas Safety
Officer’s acceptance of the following aspects of the gas work prior to concealing
them.
22.10.1 after all underground gas Construction is complete, but prior to the placing
of any concrete or backfill;
22.10.2 after heating duct installations, gas venting installations, gas piping
installations, but prior to framing;
22.10.3 gas final inspection must be performed prior to the final Building inspection,
23.Occupancy Permits
23.1 No person shall occupy a Building or Structure or part of a Building or Structure until
an occupancy permit has been issued, in the form set out in schedule “C” to this
bylaw, by the Chief Building Official
23.2 An occupancy permit shall not been issued unless:
23.2.1 all letters of assurance have been submitted when required in accordance
with sections 9.1.10, 10.1.9, and 10.3.5, of this bylaw, or
23.2.2 all aspects of the work requiring inspection and an acceptance pursuant to
section 22.4 of this bylaw have been inspected and accepted and;
23.2.3 All the requirements of this Bylaw, other relevant Bylaws of the District and
any other applicable enactment concerning safety as evidenced by inspection
approvals pursuant to sections 22.7, 22.8 and 22.9.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 22 of 45
23.3 The type of occupancy or use of a Building for which an Occupancy Permit has been
issued shall not be changed to any other type of occupancy or use which is not
specifically approved in the occupancy Permit until a new occupancy Permit therefore
has been issued by the Chief Building Official.
23.4 The site must be identified in accordance with the Corporation’s House Numbering
Bylaw for emergency vehicle and inspection purposes during Construction.
Permanent address must be in place prior to occupancy.
23.5 Before an occupancy Permit is granted, all Provisional Occupancy Permit fees and
any other Municipal fees shall be paid.
Provisional Occupancy Permit
23.6 The Chief Building Official may issue an occupancy permit for part of a Building or
Structure when that part of the Building or Structure is self-contained, provided with
essential services and meets requirements set out in section 23.2 of this bylaw.
Upon the written request of the holder of a Building Permit or the owner of a Building
for which a Building Permit has been issued, and on payment of fees required as per
schedules A, D, E and F the Chief Building Official may issue a provisional occupancy
Permit where such provisional occupancy will not jeopardize the health or safety of
the occupants of the Building. Planning and Engineering department approvals are
necessary prior to the granting of the provisional occupancy Permit..
No Provisional Occupancy Permit may be issued unless:
23.6.1 The exterior finishes of the Building are substantially complete;
23.6.2 A permanent address pursuant to Maple Ridge House Numbering Bylaw has
been assigned and posted on the Building;
23.6.3 It sets out the date of expiry of the Provisional Occupancy Permit; and
23.6.4 Where Registered Professionals are engaged in the inspection process a
certified statement from them that the provisional occupancy applied for will
not jeopardize the health or safety of occupants of the Building.
23.7 The Chief Building Official may require as a condition of issuance of a Provisional
Occupancy Permit that the owner provide security equal to the value of part or all of
outstanding Construction required to complete the Building.
23.8 The site identified as per the Corporation’s House Numbering Bylaw for emergency
vehicles and inspection purposes during Construction. Permanent address must be
in place prior to provisional occupancy.
Where other items, not of health or safety concerns, relating to Building or site issues not
covered by security already deposited with the Corporation, the Director may require an
amount of security equal to the value of outstanding Construction.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 23 of 45
24.Site Grades:
24.1 Where the natural grade of any land is altered for any reason, all slopes shall be
suitably landscaped or retained to prevent soil erosion and escape of water to or
from adjacent Premises. Existing slopes, which are adequately retained by trees,
shrubs, turf, rock or any combination thereof, shall not require further treatment.
24.2 All walls, grade transitions and methods of soil retention shall be shown on the site
plan including all details of Construction. Any wall (method of soil retention) over 1
metre high shall be structurally engineered except that in geotechnically sensitive
areas, the Chief Building Official may require a Geotechnical Engineer to design and
inspect the method of retention. A registered professional shall supervise the design
and Construction of a retaining Structure greater than 1.0 metre in height. Sealed
copies of the design plan and field review reports prepared by the registered
professional of record for all retaining Structures greater than 1.0 metre in height
shall be submitted to a Building Official prior to acceptance of the works.
24.3 Any retaining wall (method of soil retention) or grade alteration over 0.50 metres will
require a Permit for grade alteration or retaining wall(s) except that where the
retaining wall(s) have been identified on the initial Building Permit application, no
separate retaining wall Permit will be required.
25.Design Data
25.1 The following climatic design data shall be utilized for the design of Buildings in the
Municipality:
25.1.1 January 2 1/2 percent Design Temperature:-9oC
25.1.2 January l percent Design Temperature:-11oC
25.1.3 July 2 1/2 percent Design Drybulb Temperature: 30oC
25.1.4 July 2 1/2 percent Design Wetbulb Temperature: 20oC
25.1.5 Annual Total Degree-days below 18oC: 3050
25.1.6 Maximum Fifteen-minute rainfall: 10mm
25.1.7 Maximum One-day rainfall: 134mm 1/50
25.1.8 25.1.8 Annual Rain:1800mm
25.1.9 Annual Total Precipitation: 1950mm
25.1.10 Moisture Index: 1.86
25.1.11 Driving Rain Wind Pressure Pa, 1/5: 160
25.1.12 Ground snow load (kPa):
25.1.13
0-45 metres elevation: 1/50 SS =2.4 kPa (design weight based on snow depth)
SR = 0.2 kPa (design weight added for rain)
SS + SR = 2.6 kPa calculated ground snow load
Cb = 0.45 for entire roofs not exceeding 4.3 m / 0.55 m for
all other roofs
Above 45 Metres:0.008 x (Site elev. in Metres) + 2.04 kPa = SS
0.001 x (Site elev. in Metres) + 0.2 kPa = SR
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 24 of 45
CbSS +SR = specified snow load
25.1.13 Hourly Wind Pressures:Probability 1/10 = 0.36kN/m2
Probability 1/50 = 0.47kN/m2
25.1.14 Seismic Data:Sa (0.2) = 0.97
Sa (0.5) = 0.65
Sa (1.0) = 0.32
Sa (2.0) = 0.17
PGA = 0.48
26.Temporary Buildings
26.1 Application for a Building Permit for a Temporary Building shall be in writing, signed
by the applicant and shall be accompanied by:
26.1.1 plans showing the location of the proposed Temporary Building or Structure
and Construction details thereof;
26.1.2 an explanation of the intended use for the proposed Temporary Building or
Structure;
26.1.3 an agreement with the Corporation executed by the applicant, that the
applicant will remove the Temporary Building or Structure from the Premises
and leave the site in a safe, tidy and sanitary condit ion upon the expiration of
the Temporary Building Permit; and
26.1.4 cash, term deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a financial
institute acceptable to the Corporation in the amount $10,000.00 minimum
up to a maximum of $20,000.00, based on a va lue of 25% of the Building as
security for the carrying out of the agreement to remove the Temporary
Building or Structure.
26.2 If, upon the expiration of the Temporary Building Permit, the Permit holder does not
remove the Temporary Building or Structure from the Premises and leave the site in a
satisfactory condition, the Corporation may do so at the Permit holder's expense and
may deduct the cost of so doing from the security deposit. If the security deposit is
not adequate to cover the said cost the Permit holder shall pay to the Corporation
any cost in excess of the security deposit.
26.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Temporary Building or Structure which is rendered
Non Inhabitable and which conforms with all Bylaws of the Corporation and the
Provincial regulations may be allowed to remain on the Premises after the expiration
of the Temporary Building Permit upon the Permit holder applying for and receiving
an occupancy Permit for the said Building or Structure.
26.4 In addition to the requirements of Sections 26.6 to 26.13 of this Bylaw all Temporary
mobile homes except those to be occupied for Temporary Residential Use pursuant
to the provisions of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985,as amended shall
comply with Canadian Standards Association Z240 MH Series “mobile homes”, as
referenced in Division B -Part 1 of the current Building Code;
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 25 of 45
26.5 All Temporary mobile homes to be occupied for Temporary Residential Use pursuant
to the provisions of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985,as amended, and all
other Temporary Buildings or Structures shall comply with all provisions of the
Provincial regulations and all Bylaws of the Corporation. Prior to occupancy the
owner shall obtain an inspection by the Chief Building Official or a Building Official to
determine compliance with all applicable Codes and Bylaws and shall pay an
inspection fee of $l50.00 to the Corporation.
All Temporary Mobile Homes Shall:
26.6 be directly serviced by a water supply capable of supplying at least 2,250 litres of
potable water per day per dwelling on a year round basis;
26.7 be serviced by a separate sewage disposal system as filed by an “Authorized
Person”, per the Provincial Sewerage Regulation, with the Health Authority;
26.8 be serviced by an electrical subfeed from the main dwelling or, with the approval of
the Chief Building Official, a separate electrical service, when it can be shown that it
would be an extreme hardship due to location; a security deposit must be posted as
per section 26.1.4 to cover the removal;
26.9 have any fuel oil tank or propane gas tank placed in accordance with the British
Columbia Fire Code as amended and totally screened from view from any highway;
26.10 be equipped with stairs, landings and handrails;
26.11 have a skirting around the mobile home between the underside of the frame and the
ground at its exterior perimeter;
26.12 be set true, square and level on the lot; and
26.13 have any support pad or base or any material which is in contact with the ground,
consist of concrete Construction designed and constructed in accordance with the
provisions of the Building Code.
26.14 Where an application for a Building Permit is made for the Construction of a
residential dwelling on Premises where an existing residential dwelling is situated,
and only one residential dwelling is Permitted by the Bylaws of the Corporation, the
Chief Building Official may issue the Building Permit provided that the owner of the
Permit grants to the Corporation in registerable form a restrictive covenant pursuant
to Section 219 of the Land Title Act providing that:
26.14.1 Use and occupancy of the existing residential dwelling shall be prohibited
upon occupancy of the new residential dwelling;
26.14.2 The existing residential dwelling shall be wholly removed from the Premises
within 60 days of commencement of occupancy of the new residential
dwelling; and
26.14.3 Security be deposited with the Corporation to secure all the obligations of
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 26 of 45
the Covenantor.
26.15 Where a Temporary Building Permit has been issued for the Construction of a
Building for a Temporary Residential Use pursuant to the provisions of Maple Ridge
Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985,as amended and where the Temporary Building
complies with the provisions of the Provincial regulations and all Bylaws of the
Corporation, the Chief Building Official may issue a Temporary Residential Use
agreement Permit to allow occupancy of the Temporary Building for a Temporary
Residential Use provided that the owner of the Permit grants to the Corporation in
registerable form a restrictive covenant pursuant to Section 219 of the Land Title Act.
26.16 Applications for Temporary second dwelling or Temporary Residential Use agreement
Permits shall be in writing, signed by the applicant and shall be accompanied by:
26.16.1 for Buildings to be occupied during the Construction of a new dwelling,
plans showing the location of the existing dwelling and the proposed
location of the new dwelling on the Premises; Such drawings shall conform
to the requirements of Section 10;
26.16.2 a restrictive covenant pursuant to Section 219 of the Land Title Act
executed by the owner in registerable form an agreement with the
Corporation, that the applicant will remove the Temporary second dwelling
from the Premises and leave the site in a safe, tidy and sanitary condition
upon the expiration of the Temporary second dwelling Permit; Such a
restrictive covenant shall be registered with the Land Titles Office; and
26.16.3 cash, term deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a financial
institute acceptable to the Corporation in the amount of $10,000.00, as
security to secure all the obligations of the Covenantee under the restrictive
covenant;
26.17 If, upon the expiration of the Temporary second dwelling Permit, the Permit holder
does not remove the Temporary second dwelling from the Premises and does not
leave the site in a satisfactory condition, the Corporation may do so at the Permit
holder’s expense and may deduc t the cost of so doing from the security deposit. If
the security deposit is not adequate to cover the said cost the Permit holder shall pay
to the Corporation any cost in excess of the security deposit, prior to the issuance of
an occupancy Permit for the new dwelling.
26.18 Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Temporary second dwelling which is rendered Non
Inhabitable and which conforms with all Bylaws of the Corporation and the Provincial
regulations may be allowed to remain on the Premises as an accessory Building after
the expiration of the Temporary second dwelling Permit provided that the Permit
holder applies for and is issued an occupancy Permit for use of the Building as an
accessory Building.
27.Moving of Buildings
27.1 No person shall move any Building from one parcel of land to another parcel of land
without first obtaining a Building Permit therefore.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 27 of 45
27.2 Every application for a Building Permit to move a Building shall show the existing site
of the Building and the proposed site to which it is to be moved.
27.3 No Building Permit to move a Building shall be issued until the time and the route of
the moving have been approved by the Officer in Charge of the local Detachment of
the R.C.M.P., all utility companies having overhead wires along the proposed route,
the Municipal Engineering Department and the Chief Building Official.
27.4 No Building Permit required under Section 26 shall be issued unless the application
for the Building Permit includes all Construction necessary to complete the Building
or Structure in compliance with all Bylaws of the Corporation and of the Building
Code;
27.5 No Building Permit shall be issued without the proposed building being in substantial
compliance with the form and character of other buildings within 200m of the
location to which the building is to be moved.
28.Pools
28.1 No person shall construct a Pool on any Premises without first obtaining a Building
Permit to do so.
28.2 Every application for Construction of a Pool shall be accompanied by a plan showing:
28.2.1 the location of the proposed Pool in relation to all existing Buildings on the
Premises and the parcel boundaries;
28.2.2 the type of Construction;
28.2.3 the water supply and proposed method of drainage;
28.2.4 septic approval from the Health Authority if not serviced by Municipal
Sanitary Sewer; and
28.2.5 the proposed method and location of fencing and gates.
28.3 Every Pool, whether filled with water or empty, shall be completely enclosed with a
fence or other Structure which is not less than 1.2 metres in height, which has no
opening or gap with its largest dimension being more than 100 mm for vertical
pickets or 25.4 mm for chain link fencing. Further, this enclosing structure must
comply with the Building Code requirements for climbability of guards to restrict
access to the Pool. The fence or other Structure shall be continuous except for
points of access which shall, except for access from doors of the residence, be
equipped with self-closing gates which are designed so that they will return to a
latched or locked position when not in use, and which are secured by a latch or lock
located not less than 150 mm from the top of the gate and not less than l metre
above grade, on the Pool side of the fence or other Structure. Also, the area within
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 28 of 45
300 mm of the latch mechanism must be solid with the only gap –maximum 12.5
mm -occurring between the gate and the adjacent post to which the gate latches.
28.4 Every fence or other Structure enclosing a Pool, whether filled with water or empty,
shall be maintained by the owner or occupier of the Premises upon which the pool is
located, in good order and repair so that it is adequate to perform its intended
function. All sagging gates, loose parts, worn latches or locks and all broken or
binding members shall be promptly and ade quately replaced or repaired.
28.5 Every gate in a fence or other Structure which provides access to a Pool shall be kept
in a latched or locked closed position and shall only be open for the purpose of entry
to or exit from the Pool area during such period.
28.6 Every Pool and hot tub shall be drained into a sanitary sewer system or, where a
sanitary sewer system of adequate capacity is not available, into a dedicated septic
dry well or rock pit approved by the Health Authority.
29.Plumbing
29.1 No Plumbing System, as defined in the current Building Code shall be installed,
altered or repaired except in accordance with the provisions of this Bylaw and the
Building Code and Regulations.
29.2 No Plumbing, including drainage systems, septic tanks, sewers and sewer
connections,or any part thereof, shall be located outside of the lot being served by
such Plumbing, except where an easement has been registered in the Land Title
Office charging the lands burdened by the easement and benefiting the lands served
by such Plumbing System.
29.3 No Plumbing storm drainage system shall be installed without gravity drainage to a
Municipal or other approved drainage system unless a written request is made, a
restrictive covenant pursuant to Section 219 of the Land Title Act executed by the
owner in registerable form including engineering details and auxiliary electrical
backup power specifications or other equivalent emergency systems. Such details
must be provided and approved by the Chief Building Official prior to the
commencement of any Building or drainage Construction.
Permit Required
29.4 Except as hereinafter specifically provided, no Plumbing shall be installed, altered or
repaired until a Permit to do so has first been obtained pursuant to this Bylaw.
29.5 No Building Permit shall be required for the repair of leaks in water pipes or the
replacing of Plumbing fixtures, provided that such fixtures and the installation thereof
conform with all other requirements of this Bylaw and the provincial regulations, or
for the removal of blockages in sewer or drain pipes provided that clean-outs are
utilized for such purpose and it is not necessary to cut any sewer or drain pipe.
29.6 Where Construction has commenced prior to issuance of the Plumbing Permit, the
Permit fee shall be doubled up to a maximum of $2,000.00 per Building.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 29 of 45
29.7 A Plumbing Permit shall only be issued to a plumber holding a valid British Columbia
Journeyman Plumber qualification and a valid Maple Ridge Business License or,
where the installation, alteration or repair of Plumbing is to be carried out within a
single family dwelling and entirely by the owner and occupier or intended occupier of
the Premises for which the Permit is sought.
29.8 where the Construction is done under a home owner Permit and that person is found
to be incompetent or to have violated a condition under which the Permit was issued,
that Permit will be revoked by the Chief Building Official and a qualified plumber will
be required to review the project and complete it under a new Permit prior to
occupancy being issued relevant to this Permit.
29.9 Every application for a Plumbing Permit shall:
29.9.1 be made in the form provided for such purposes;
29.9.2 be signed by the applicant; and
29.9.3 be accompanied by plans and specifications sufficient to describe the
proposed Construction and establish compliance with the Building Code,
this Bylaw and all other Bylaws of the Corporation.
29.10 Where an application has been made for a Plumbing Permit pursuant to this Bylaw
and:
29.10.1 the proposed Construction as shown in the application conforms with the
Building Code and Regulations, this Bylaw and all other Bylaws of the
Corporation;
29.10.2 the applicant has shown proof that he is the holder of a valid British
Columbia tradesman’s qualification certification as a plumber or, where the
applicant is the owner and occupier or intended occupier of a single family
dwelling for which the Permit is sought, he has delivered a signed
declaration that he will be carrying out the Construction himself; and
29.10.3 the applicant has paid the prescribed fee as set out in Schedule “D” hereto;
the Chief Building Official shall issue the Plumbing Permit for which the
application was made.
29.11 The holder of a Plumbing Permit shall obtain an inspection by a Building Official to
determine compliance with the provisions of this Bylaw and the current Building Code
and Regulations:
29.11.1 after the rough Plumbing is complete, but prior to the installation of any
fixtures or the covering thereof by dirt, concrete, insulation, lath or other
interior or exterior finish which would conceal such Construction; and
29.11.2 when the Plumbing is complete and ready for use, but before the Plumbing
is put into use by the owner or occupier of the Premises.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 30 of 45
29.12 Provided however, that where a registered professional registered to practice
Mechanical Engineering in the Province of British Columbia has been engaged by the
owner for the inspection of the Plumbing and where the prior written approval of the
Chief Building Official has been obtained, sealed certificates of compliance with the
approved plans and the provincial regulations, submitted by the registered
professional of record, may be accepted in lieu of inspections made by the Chief
Building Official or a Building Official.
29.13 The holder of a Plumbing Permit shall, during the installation, alteration or repair of
the Plumbing Constructions, keep a copy of the Permit documentation approved
drawings and specifications, which accompanied the Permit application on the
Premises. These drawings and specifications shall be kept on site and available to
the Building Official so that they are able to complete the inspections. Failure to have
the drawings on site will be deemed an offence under this bylaw and will require
a re-inspection fee and re-inspection to verify that the Construction complies with the
Permit.
30.Gas
30.1 Parts 1 to 9 of the current CSA B149.1 -00 Standard, as amended, Natural Gas and
Propane Installation Code are hereby adopted and forms part of this Bylaw.
30.2 Every person who obtains a Permit for the installation or alteration of gas
Construction pursuant to the B.C. Safety Standards Act and related Gas Safety
Regulation shall pay to the Corporation the fees prescribed in Schedule “E” hereto
prior to obtaining the Permit.
30.3 Every person who obtains a Permit pursuant to this Section 30 shall maintain and
keep a copy of the Permit and all documentation and plans pertaining thereto on the
Premises on which the Construction authorized by the said Permit is being done.
Failure to have the Permit documentation on site will be deemed an offence under
this Bylaw and will require a re-inspection fee and re-inspection to verify that the
Construction complies with the Permit.
31.Electrical
31.2 Parts 1 and 2 of the current Canadian Electrical Code, as amended, are hereby
adopted and form part of this Bylaw.
31.1 Every person who obtains a Permit for the installation or alteration of Electrical
Equipment pursuant to the B.C. Safety Standards Act, Electrical Safety Regulation
and Electrical Code,shall pay to the Corporation the fees prescribed in Schedule “F”
hereto prior to obtaining the Permit.
31.2 Every person who obtains a Permit pursuant to this Section 31 shall maintain and
keep a copy of the Permit and all documentation and plans pertaining thereto on the
Premises on which the Construction authorized by the said Permit is being done.
Failure to have the Permit documentation on site will be deemed an offense under
this Bylaw and will require a re-inspection fee and inspection to verify that the
Construction complies with the Permit.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 31 of 45
32.Penalties and Enforcement
32.1 Every person who contravenes any provision of this bylaw commits an of fence
punishable on summary conviction and shall be liable to a fine of not more than
$10,000.00 (Ten Thousand Dollars) or to imprisonment for not more than six months
and or impose a “Monetary Penalty” in accordance with the enabling Monetary
Penalty Regulation for Gas and Electrical works or workmanship, forming part of the
B.C. Safety Standards Act.
32.2 The Chief Building Official may order the cessation of any work that is proceeding in
contravention of the Building Code,B.C. Gas Safety Code and Electrical Code or
related Safety Regulations,this bylaw, any other bylaw of the Corporation or any
other applicable enactment concerning safety, by posting a Stop Work notice in the
form provided by the Chief Building Official.
32.3 The owner of property on which a Stop Work notice has been posted, and every other
person, shall cease all Construction work immediately and shall not do any work until
all applicable provisions of this bylaw have been substantially complied with and the
Stop Work notice has been rescinded in writing by a Building Official.
32.4 Where a person occupies a Building or Structure or part of a Building or Structure in
contravention of section 6.4 of this bylaw the Chief Building Official may post a Do
Not Occupy notice in the form provided by the Chief Building Official on the affected
part of the Building or Structure.
32.5 The owner of property on which a Do Not Occupy notice has been posted, and every
person, shall cease occupancy of the Building or Structure immediately and shall
refrain from further occupancy until all applicable provisions of the Building Code and
this bylaw have been substantially complied with and the Do Not Occupy notice has
been rescinded in writing by the Chief Building Official.
33.Severability
33.1 If any part, section,sub-section, clause, or sub-clause of this bylaw is, for any reason,
held to be invalid by the decision of a Court of competent jurisdiction, such decision
does not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this bylaw.
34.Forms and Schedules
34.1 Schedules A,B,C, D, E & F attached to this Bylaw form a part of this bylaw.
READ a FIRST TIME on this day of
READ a second time on this day of
READ a third time on this day of
ADOPTED this day of
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 32 of 45
PRESIDING MEMBER
CORPORATE OFFICER
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 33 of 45
SCHEDULE “A”–Building Permit Fees
Effective January 1, 1999
The following fees shall be paid by the applicant for a Permit to construct a Building or a Pool:
BASE FEES
For market value of Building or Pool or Construction to be done thereon of up to
$l000.00 -$35.00
For market value of Building or Pool or Construction to be done thereon of
$l001.00 -$2000.00 -$43.00 plus:
$8.95 for each additional $l000.00 or part thereof up to
$25,000.00, plus
$8.65 for each additional $1000.00 or part thereof up to
$50,000.00, plus
$8.10 for each additional $1000.00 or part thereof up to
$75,000.00, plus
$7.60 for each additional $1000.00 or part thereof over
$100,000.00, plus
$6.30 for each additional $1000.00 or part thereof up to
infinite.
NOTE:Building Values shall be based upon current estimated Construction costs. The current
edition of the Marshall Valuation Service, the Marshall and Swift Residential Cost Handbook or
other valuation tables may be used by the Chief Building Official to determine the market value
for the purpose of assessing Permit fees.
OTHER FEES
Where an application is made for a Building Permit for other than Single Family Detached
Dwellings, there will be an additional fee of $79.00 per dwelling unit.
In addition to the above, the following fees shall be paid by the applicant for a Permit pursuant to
this Bylaw:
1.Permit to erect a retaining wall -first 20m or portion thereof $53.00
for each additional 10m or portion thereof -$27.00
2.Permit to install a fireplace, stove or chimney -$30.25 for each fireplace, stove or flue.
3.Permit to install a Dry Chemical Fire Extinguishing System -$30.25
4.Building Demolition Permit -$30.25
5.Temporary Building Permit $30.25
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 34 of 45
SCHEDULE “A”–Building Permit Fees
Effective January 1, 1999
6.Temporary Second Dwelling Permit -$30.25
7.Provisional Occupancy Permit -
(a)SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
(i)$79.00 (90 day maximum period)
(ii)$27.00 renewal (90 day maximum period)
(b)MULTI FAMILY DWELLING
(i)$79.00 per unit (120 day maximum period)
(ii)$27.00 renewal per unit (60 day maximum)
(c)OTHER THAN RESIDENTIAL
(i)$79.00 per unit (60 day maximum period)
(ii)$27.00 renewal per unit (60 day maximum)
8.For Change of Occupancy or use where a Building Permit is not required -$30.25
9.Permit Assignment or Transfer Fee -$30.25
10.Permit Renewal Fee -$30.25
11.Re-inspection Fee where more than 1 re -inspection is required due to the fault of the holder
of a Building Permit -$35.50 for each extra re-inspection required.
12.Address Change:
(i)If Permit has been issued but no occupancy Permit issued -$105.00 per unit;
(ii)Permit application in process but Permit not issued -$42.00 per unit
(iii)Occupancy Permit issued, follow fee schedule in accordance with Maple Ridge
House Numbering Bylaw
13.Additional fee for any inspection performed outside the boundaries of the Municipality $.40
per km traveled, measured from the Municipal Hall to the site of the inspection along the
shortest available highway route.
14.Miscellaneous and Special Inspections:
(a)during normal working hours -$38.50 per hour;
(b)outside normal working hours -$55.50 per hour;
(c)minimum charge -1 hour
15.A fee of $2.00 per page, for plans for micro film charge over and above Building Permit.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 35 of 45
SCHEDULE “A”–Building Permit Fees
Effective January 1, 1999
16.Charges as shown below will be applicable for examination of plans and specifications on
application of Building Permit:
(a)Plan Check Fee -$42.00 per hour
(b)Single or Two Family -minimum $30.25 per unit
(c)Other than Single or Two Family -minimum $105.00 per Building
17.For each written Building record search, for legal purposes a fee of $79.00 per parcel or file
is applicable.
18.Business Licence Inspection Fee -minimum $30.25 per inspection,
maximum $121.00 per inspection.
19.Where Construction is started prior to obtaining a Permit, the applicable Permit fee shall be
doubled but in no case shall the penalty amount doubled, exceed $1,600.00 per Building.
20.If the applicant makes an erroneous declaration on the Permit application to obtain a lesser
Permit fee, the Permit shall be revoked and a new Permit issued using the corrected value.
The new Permit shall be calculated according to the corrected Permit value and a 50%
administrative fee shall be added to the calculated fee.
22.A fee of $28.25 for environmental inspection shall be paid for each residential unit with a
value in excess of $10,000.00. For each non residential unit a fee of $28.25 per unit
shall be paid where the value exceeds $20,000.00.
Building Bylaw No.6925-2012 Page 36 of 45
SCHEDULE “B”-Solar Hot Water Regulation
Effective upon adoption of the Bylaw
Contents
1.Definitions
2.Applications
3.Solar collectors for a domestic hot water system
4.Solar hot water ready components
5.Conduits runs
Definitions
1.In this regulation, the terms in italics have the same as in the 2006 British Columbia
Building Code.
Application
2.This regulation is applicable in the following local government jurisdictions:
(a)Cariboo Regional District;
(b)City of Campbell River;
(c)City of Chilliwack;
(d)City of Colwood;
(e)City of Cranbrook;
(f)City of Dawson Creek;
(g)City of Duncan;
(h)City of Fernie;
(i)City of Fort St. John;
(j)City of Kelowna;
(k)City of New Westminster;
(l)City of North Vancouver;
(m)City of Richmond;
(n)City of Pitt Meadows;
(o)City of Port Coquitlam;
(p)City of Port Moody;
(q)City of West Vancouver;
(r)Corporation of Delta;
(s)Cowichan Valley Regional District;
(t)District of Invermere;
(u)District of Maple Ridge;
(v)District of Metchosin;
(w)District of North Vancouver;
(x)District of Peachland;
(y)District of Sparwood;
(z)District of Tofino;
(aa)Greater Vancouver Regional District;
(bb)Municipality of North Cowichan;
(cc)Resort Municipality of Whistler;
(dd)Squamish Lillooet Regional District;
(ee)Town of View Royal;
(ff)Township of Esquimalt;
(gg)Township of Langley;
(hh)Village of Ashcroft;
(ii)Village of Kaslo;
(jj)Village of Midway.
Building Bylaw No.6925 -2012 Page 37 of 45
SCHEDULE “B”-Solar Hot Water Regulation
Effective upon adoption of the Bylaw
Solar collectors for a domestic hot water system
3.(1)Subject to subsection (2), 2 conduit runs and an area that
(a)is not less than 9.3 square meters,
(b)has no dimension less than 2.7 meters, and
(c)is designated for future installation of solar collectors for a solar domestic hot
water system in compliance with CAN/CSA-F383-87
Must be incorporated in construction of new buildings of residential occupancy that
contain
(a)One dwelling unit, or
(b)One dwelling unit and one secondary suite.
(2)Subsection (1) does not apply with respect to new construction referred to in that
subsection if the local government of the jurisdiction to which this regulation applies
and within which the new construction is to oc cur is satisfied that building site
conditions do not permit effective use of solar hot water heating
Structural requirements
4.Structural members of areas referred to in section 3 (1) must be designed to
accommodate the greater of the following;
(a)the anticipated load;
(b)A load of 0.2 kpa in addition to design loads required by the British Columbia
Building Code.
Conduit runs
5.(1)Two straight, continuous, conduit runs must be provided tha t extend from the area
directly adjacent to the building’s primary service water heater to
(a)an accessible attic space adjacent to the roof area designated for installation of
solar collectors for a domestic hot water system,
(b)the roof area designated for installation of solar collectors for a solar domestic
hot water system, or
(c)the exterior wall surface directly adjacent to the area designated for the
installation of solar collectors for a solar domestic hot water system.
(2)Conduit runs described in subsection (1) must
(a)be accessible at both ends,
(b)be capped or sealed at both ends to prevent water ingress and air leakage,
(c)be identified by markings that are permanent, distinct and easily recognized,
(d)have a minimum inside diameter of 55 mm, and
(e)be able to accommodate the installation of insulated plumbing services for a
solar domestic hot water system in compliance with CAN/CSA-F383, Installation
Code for Solar Domestic Hot Water Systems, as referred to in the British
Columbia Building Code.
Building Bylaw No.6925 -2012 Page 38 of 45
SCHEDULE “C”
OCCUPANCY PERMIT
Address of Building:
Legal Description:
Approved Occupancy (use):
Name of Business, if applicable:
The Building constructed under the authority of Building Permit Number:
is approved for Occupancy.
The septic system for this Building has been approved for bedrooms.
This Permit pertains to sq ft of the basement being finished.
This Permit number does include or does not include a secondary suite.
This Permit confirms that inspections pursuant to the Distri ct of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw have
been complete and no substantive violation of health or safety requirements have been observed.
This Permit is not a warranty that the subject Building complies with all Municipal and Provincial
Regulations governing Building Construction nor that it is without defect. It is only a comment on
the conditions of the Building at the date of issue only.
This certificate shall be affixed to a conspicuous and permanent place in the said Building
and shall not be removed.
NOTE: A new Permit shall be obtained prior to any change in the use of the Building.
Chief Building Official
Per:
Date:
Building Bylaw No.6925 -2012 Page 39 of 45
SCHEDULE “D”–Plumbing Permit Fees
Effective January 1, 1999
The following fees shall be paid by the applicant for a Permit to install, alter or repair Plumbing:
1.Minimum fee for any Plumbing Permit or inspections -$30.25
2.For Plumbing Construction which involves the installation of fixtures:
$16.90 for the first fixture plus
$15.25 for each additional fixture
For the purpose of this Bylaw,“fixtures”shall include Pools, interceptors, hot water storage tanks,
automatic washers, roof drains, floor drains and built -in dishwashers.
Where an application is made for a Plumbing Permit for other than single family detached
dwellings, there will be an additional fee of $27.00 per dwelling unit.
Permit fees for finishing Plumbing only (installation of fixtures where rough -in Plumbing exists)
shall be 50% of the above fees.
3.For Plumbing Construction which involves the connection of hydraulic equipment or the
installation of vacuum breakers, backflow prevention devices or similar equipment -$22.40
per item connected or installed.
4.For Plumbing Construction which involves the installation of lawn irrigation systems -
$36.50
5.For Plumbing Construction which involves the installation of fire sprinkler systems:
(a)for up to six (6) sprinkler heads -$38.50
(b)for each additional sprinkler head -$ 0.45
6.For Plumbing Construction which involves the installation of standpipes, Siamese
connections, fire hose connections and fire hydrants -$22.40 for each hydrant or hose
connection.
7.For Plumbing Construction which involves the installation of storm sewers, perimeter
foundation drains, sanitary sewers or water service lines:
(a)for single or two-family dwellings -$36.50 each
(b)for other than single or two-family dwellings:
(i)first 30 metres or part thereof -$43.00 each
(ii)each additional 30 metres or part thereof -$22.40 each
(iii)each sump, catchbasin, rock pit, dry well or manhole -$22.40
Building Bylaw No.6925 -2012 Page 40 of 45
SCHEDULE “D”–Plumbing Permit Fees
Effective January 1, 1999
8.Re-inspection fee where more than 1 re-inspection is required due to the fault of the Permit
holder -$35.50 for each extra re-inspection required.
9.Permit assignment or transfer fee -$30.25
10.Permit renewal -$30.25
11.Miscellaneous and special inspections:
(a)During normal working hours -$38.50 per hour;
(b)Outside normal working hours -$55.50 per hour;
(c)Minimum Charge -1 Hour.
12.Charges as shown below will be applicable for examination of plans and specifications on
application.
(a)Plan Check Fee -$42.00 per hour
(b)Single or Two Family Dwellings -minimum $30.25 per unit.
(c)Other than Single or Two Family Dwellings -minimum $105.00 per Building.
13.Business Licence Inspection Fee -minimum $30.25 per inspection, maximum $30.25per
inspection.
14.Where Construction is started prior to obtaining a Permit, the applicable Permit fee shall be
doubled, but in no case shall the penalty amount doubled, exceed $1,600.00 per Building.
15.If the applicant makes an erroneous declaration on the Permit application to obtain a lesser
Permit fee, the Permit shall be revoked and a new Permit issued using the corrected
information. The new Permit shall be calculated according to the corrected Permit value and
a 50%administrative fee shall be added to the calculated fee.
Building Bylaw No.6925 -2012 Page 41 of 45
SCHEDULE “E”–Gas Permit Fees
Effective January 1, 1999
The following fees shall be paid by the applicant for a Permit to install or alter gas Construction:
1.For gas Construction which involves the replacement of an appliance or the installation of a
new gas appliance.
(a)for Single or Multi-Family Dwellings:
(i)$24.50 per appliance,$31.50 minimum
(b)for other than Single or Multi-Family Dwellings:
(i)up to 102,000 BTU/hr $44.00 per appliance
(ii)102,001 -409,000 BTU/hr $60.50 per appliance
NOTE:Fee for additional appliances are calculated on BTU rating.
2.Where an application is made for a Permit for other than single family detached dwellings,
there will be an additional fee of $27.00 per dwelling unit.
3.Gas Heated Buildings -Building heat loss calculation review
(i)$53.00 per Single Family Dwelling.
(ii)$11.00 per unit for Multi Family Use -not less than $53.00 per Building
(iii)$105.00 per Building for other than Residential.
4.For gas Construction which involves the installation of vents or furnace plenums only -
$24.50 each
5.For gas Construction which involves the installation of house piping:
(a)for single or two family dwellings -$35.50 per unit;
(b)for other than single or two family dwellings:
(i)first 30 metres or part thereof -$43.00 per unit plus
(ii)each additional 30 metres or part thereof -$21.50 per unit
6.Re-inspection fee where more than one (1) inspection is required due to faulty workmanship
or materials -$35.50 for each extra re-inspection required.
7.Permit Renewal -$30.25
8.Permit Transfer -$30.25
9.Miscellaneous and special inspections:
(a)During normal working hours -$38.50 per hour;
(b)Outside normal working hours -$55.50 per hour;
Building Bylaw No.6925 -2012 Page 42 of 45
SCHEDULE “E”–Gas Permit Fees
Effective January 1, 1999
(c)Minimum charge -l hour
10.Charges as shown below will be applicable for examination of plans and specifications on
application of Gas Permit.
(a)Plan Check Fee -$42.00 per hour
(b)Single or Two Family Dwellings -minimum $30.25 per unit
(c)Other than Single or Two Family Dwellings -minimum $121.00 per Building.
11.Oil and Propane Fee Schedule would follow the Gas Fee Schedule “E”in it's entirety.
12.Business Licence Inspection Fee -minimum $30.25 per inspection, maximum $121.00 per
inspection.
13.Where Construction is started prior to obtaining a Permit, the applicable Permit fee shall be
doubled, but in no case shall the penalty amount doubled, exceed $1,600.00 per Building.
14.If the applicant makes an erroneous declaration on the Permit application to obtain a lesser
Permit fee, the Permit shall be revoked and a new Permit issued using the corrected
information. The new Permit shall be calculated according to the corrected Permit value and
a 50%administrative fee shall be added to the calculated fee.
Building Bylaw No.6925 -2012 Page 43 of 45
SCHEDULE “F”–Electrical Permit Fees
Effective January 1, 1999
The following fees shall be paid by the applicant for a Permit to install Electrical Equipment:
For one and two Family Dwellings including additions, the Permit fee shall be 15%of the building
Permit fee or the minimum electrical Permit fee, whichever is greater.
The following additional charges are applicable to one and two family dwelling when the electrical
Permit is taken out in conjunction with a building permit:
1.a) Each hot tub or spa $12.80
b) Each hydro massage tub bath $10.30
c) Electrical Heating or based on the value $26.00 minimum
of electrical heating contract, which ever is greater
d) Air Conditioning $10.30 per unit
e) Each sub panel $10.30
Fees for all other work not included above
For market value of Electrical Equipment, including costs of installation, of up to $200.00 -
$31.25
For market value of Electrical Equipment, including costs of installation of $201.00 -$500.00 -
$41.00
For market value of Electrical Equipment, including costs of installation of $501.00 -
$1000.00 -$57.50 plus:
$21.00 for each additional $l000.00 or part thereof up to $10,000.00 plus
$ 8.10 for each additional $l000.00 or part thereof up to $100,000.00 plus
$ 6.00 for each additional $l000.00 or part thereof up to $250,000.00 plus
$ 4.40 for each additional $l000.00 or part thereof up to $300,000.00 plus
$ 3.40 for each additional $1000.00 or part thereof over $300,000.00 to infinite.
NOTE:Market values shall be based upon current estimated electrical installation costs.
Where an application is made for an Electrical Permit for other than Single Family Detached
Dwellings, there will be an additional fee of $27.00 per dwelling unit.
In addition to the above, the following fees shall be paid by the applicant for a Permit to install
Electrical Equipment.
2.Underground Service Duct -$25.70
Building Bylaw No.6925 -2012 Page 44 of 45
SCHEDULE “F”–Electrical Permit Fees
Effective January 1, 1999
3.Temporary:
(a)Temporary to permanent connection conversion $23.40
(b)Temporary Service connection $23.40
4.Temporary current Permit for uses other than carnivals:
(a)Initial six (6) month period -$31.50
(b)Each additional six (6) month renewal period -$28.25
5.Special Event Permit Including Carnivals:
Each Location:$57.00
6.Movie Shoot Permit:
(a)up to 14 days $79.00
(b)Annual permits, per location $155.00
(c)Inspections outside normal working hours
additional fee $206.00
7.Annual Permit:
(a)for commercial or industrial facilities:
(i)per KVA of service capacity .13
(ii)minimum fee $52.00
(iii)maximum fee 1,576.00
(b)for educational or institutional facilities -$5.00 for each classroom, shop, laboratory,
office, etc.
8.Pool Grounding Permit -$27.00
9.Re-inspection fee where more than one (1) re-inspection is required due to faulty
workmanship or materials -$35.50 for each extra re-inspection required.
10.Permit Transfer -$30.25
11.Permit Renewal -$30.25
12.Miscellaneous and special inspections:
(a)During normal working hours -$38.50 per hour;
(b)Outside normal working hours -$55.50 per hour;
(c)Minimum charge -One (1) hour.
Building Bylaw No.6925 -2012 Page 45 of 45
SCHEDULE “F”–Electrical Permit Fees
Effective January 1, 1999
13.Charges as shown below will be applicable for examination of plans and specifications on
application of electrical Permit.
(a)Plan Check Fee -minimum $42.00 per hour
(b)Single or Two Family Dwellings -minimum $30.25 per unit.
(c)Other than Single or Two Family Dwellings -minimum $105.00 per Building.
14.Business Licence Inspection Fee -minimum $30.25 per inspection, maximum $121.00 per
inspection.
15.Where Construction is started prior to obtaining a Permit, the applicable Permit fee shall be
doubled, but in no case shall the penalty amount doubled, exceed $1,600.00 per Building.
16.If the applicant makes an erroneous declaration of the Permit value to obtain a lesser
Permit fee, the Permit shall be revoked and a new Permit issued using the corrected value.
The new Permit shall be calculated according to the corrected Permit value and a 50%
administrative fee shall be added to the calculated fee.
District of Maple Ridge
TO:His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE:June 4, 2012
and Members of Council FILE NO:E03-012-002
FROM:Chief Administrative Officer MEETING:C of W
SUBJECT:GVWD Drinking Water Management Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) has recently adopted the updated Drinking Water
Management Plan (DWMP)originally developed in 2005,and is seeking municipal endorsement of
the plan. The DWMP is part of a suite of regional plans that are supported by the Region’s
Sustainability Framework.For the implementation of the DWMP to be successful, the GVWD and
member municipalities are required to work together to implement the actions.A copy of the DWMP
is attached to this report and it is recommended that Council support the ongoing implementation of
the municipal actions contained within the plan.
Metro Vancouver’s report entitled “Adoption of the 2011 Drinking Water Management Plan”
indicates that “the 2011 update of the DWMP does not include any new actions for Metro Vancouver
that are not included in existing programs and budgets or any new actions for municipalities from the
existing [2005] DWMP.”
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT the Greater Vancouver Water District’s Drinking Water Management Plan be endorsed; and
THAT the implementation of appropriate municipal actions in support of the Drinking Water
Management Plan be subject to review through the District’s annual Business Planning process.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The DWMP outlines goals, strategies and actions for municipalities and Metro Vancouver to
achieve in supplying clean, safe drinking water to more than 2.3 million people and
associated businesses.The plan has three primary goals which are supported by strategies
and actions:
Provide Clean, Safe Drinking Water
Ensure the Sustainable use of Water Resources
Ensure the Efficient Supply of Water
For implementation of the DWMP to be successful, both the regional and municipal
governments are required to take appropriate actions as identified within the DWMP.
1110
The District approved the original 2005 DWMP in January 2006.In early 2011, the GVWD
Board directed Metro Vancouver staff to proceed with consultation on an update to the 2005
DWMP. A draft of the updated DWMP was reviewed by the Regional Engineers Advisory
Committee (REAC), the REAC Water Sub-Committee and the public.District staff participated
in the REAC and REAC Water Sub-Committee reviews.After considering feedback on the
draft plan, the GVWD Board approved the updated DWMP on July 29, 2011.Metro
Vancouver has previously requested that member municipalities adopt the plan.The majority
of municipalities have adopted the plan.
Metro Vancouver’s report entitled “Adoption of the 2011 Drinking Water Management Plan”
indicates that “the 2011 update of the DWMP does not include any new actions for Metro
Vancouver that are not included in existing programs and budgets or any new actions for
municipalities from the existing [2005] DWMP.” However,the 2011 DWMP is different from
the 2005 document in layout and wording. For example, while the 2005 DWMP indicates
that “the GVWD and its members commit to achieving a retail water structure that reflects
the long-run marginal cost of regional water supply,” the 2011 DWMP is more specific,
specifying separate Metro Vancouver and Municipal actions. The Metro Vancouver action
(2.1.4) is to “set the wholesale water rates and water rate structure to reflect the cost of
regional water supply, and achieve water conservation and other sustainability objectives.”
The municipal action (2.1.10) is to “achieve a retail water rate structure that reflects the cost
of regional water supply and, if practical, the regional seasonal price structure.”
The DWMP is not required by senior government legislation. However, it does align with
several provincial initiatives such as the Action Plan for Safe Drinking Water in British
Columbia, Living Water Smart: British Columbia’s Water Plan,the Water Sustainability Act,
the BC Climate Action Plan and Integrated Resource Recovery.
The DWMP reaffirms ongoing practices adopted by the District and identifies a few
opportunities for potential improvement.
b)Desired Outcome:
To obtain Council’s endorsement and approval to implement appropriate municipal actions
in support of the updated regional DWMP.
c)Strategic Alignment:
The DWMP supports several of the Visions and Key Strategies documented in the District’s
Corporate Strategic Plan, including those related to Environment, Smart Managed Growth,
Financial Management, and Inter-Government Relations/Networks.
d)Citizens/Customer Implications:
The DWMP has been developed to deliver quality water and customer service to
municipalities and ultimately to District water utility customers. Endorsement of the DWMP
and the municipal actions will serve customers well.
e)Interdepartmental Implications:
The municipal actions outlined in the updated DWMP are implemented through the efforts of
several departments, including Engineering,Operations,Finance,Licenses Permits and
Bylaws, and Communications.
f)Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The updated DWMP is not significantly different from the 2005 version of the plan approved
by Council. Therefore, there is little impact to the Business Plan and initiatives will be
reviewed and cost implications will be noted through the annual Business Planning process.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Drinking Water Management Plan is an action oriented plan which provides direction and priority
for drinking water initiatives in the Region. The plan ensures that the water needs of the Region will
be met in an affordably and sustainably for at least the next 25 years.
The GVWD Board has adopted an updated 2011 Drinking Water Management Plan and has
requested that member municipalities consider adoption as well.The District of Maple Ridge has
already adopted the 2005 version of the Drinking Water Management Plan and incorporated it into
the District’s Business Plan. As such, the 2011 Drinking Water Management Plan is seen as a
worthwhile guiding document that should be endorsed.
“Original signed by David Pollock”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by:David Pollock,PEng.
Municipal Engineer
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by:Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
General Manager: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule
_______________________________________________
Concurrence:J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
JD/mi
Attachment:Metro Vancouver’s 2011 Drinking Water Management Plan
Drinking Water
Management Plan
Metro Vancouver
www.metrovancouver.org
JUNE 2011
SUSTAINABLE REGION INITIATIVE... TURNING IDEAS INTO ACTION
TablE of CoNTENTs
VISION ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1
PART ONE: PLAN OVERVIEW ..........................................................................................................................................................................2
Metro VancouVer SuStainability FraMework ..........................................................................2
regional ViSion ...................................................................................................................................2
context For the Drinking water ManageMent Plan ...........................................................4
History .................................................................................................................................................................4
Trends, Challenges, Opportunities ...................................................................................................................4
Roles and Responsibilities .................................................................................................................................4
Provincial Government Oversight of Drinking Water Systems .......................................................................5
Aligning with Provincial Initiatives .....................................................................................................................6
Coordinating with other Metro Vancouver Plans .............................................................................................7
PART TWO: GOALS, STRATEGIES and ACTIONS .............................................................................................................10
goal 1: ProViDe clean, SaFe Drinking water ............................................................................10
Strategy 1.1 Use a risk management multi-barrier approach from source to tap ...........................10
Strategy 1.2 Manage watersheds to provide clean, safe water .........................................................11
Strategy 1.3 Identify and secure additional water supplies for the region .......................................12
goal 2: enSure the SuStainable uSe oF water reSourceS ....................................................12
Strategy 2.1 Use drinking water sustainably ........................................................................................12
Strategy 2.2 Match water quality to usage requirements ...................................................................14
Strategy 2.3 Manage and protect watersheds as natural assets ........................................................15
goal 3: enSure the eFFicient SuPPly oF water .........................................................................16
Strategy 3.1 Manage infrastructure proactively...................................................................................16
Strategy 3.2 Optimize capacity through effective partnerships .........................................................17
PERFORMANCE MEASURES ..........................................................................................................................................................................18
Adaptive Management ....................................................................................................................................18
Figures and Tables
Figure 1 Metro Vancouver’s Sustainability Framework ..................................................................................3
Figure 2 Roles and responsibilities in the provision of safe drinking water sourced from
Metro Vancouver’s watersheds .........................................................................................................5
Figure 3 Metro Vancouver’s Interconnected Management Plans .................................................................7
Table 1 Linkages between Metro Vancouver Management Plans .................................................................8
1Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011
ThE DriNkiNg WaTEr MaNagEMENT PlaN
Metro Vancouver and member municipalities work together to supply clean, safe drinking water to more than
2.3 million people and associated businesses in the Metro Vancouver region. The Drinking Water Management
Plan (DWMP) ensures that our region’s water needs will be met affordably and sustainably. This will be done by
using water more efficiently so that the water supply stretches out into the future even as the region’s population
continues to grow and increasing supply from the Coquitlam Lake reservoir.
The investments in water treatment, supply and conservation programs included in this plan will increase the cost
of drinking water but the benefits include consistently higher quality drinking water, improved supply reliability,
and greater environmental protection.
Metro Vancouver commits to provide clean, safe drinking water and ensure its sustainable use.
VisioN
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 20112
ParT oNE: PlaN oVErViEW
Metro Vancouver is a political body and corporate entity operating under provincial legislation as a
‘regional district’ and ‘greater boards’ that delivers regional services, planning and political leadership on
behalf of 24 local authorities. it comprises of:
CITY OF
COQUITLAM
CORPORATION OF
DELTA
CITY OF LANGLEY
ELECTORAL
AREA A
(UNINCORPORATED
AREA)
CITY OF
ABBOTSFORD
VILLAGE OF
ANMORE
VILLAGE OF
BELCARRA
BOWEN ISLAND
MUNICIPALITY
CITY OF BURNABY
TOWNSHIP OF
LANGLEY
VILLAGE OF
LIONS BAY
DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
CITY OF NEW
WESTMINSTER
CITY OF NORTH
VANCOUVER
DISTRICT OF NORTH
VANCOUVER
CITY OF
PITT MEADOWS
CITY OF PORT
COQUITLAM
CITY OF
PORT MOODY
CITY OF RICHMOND
CITY OF SURREY
TSAWWASSEN
FIRST NATION
CITY OF
VANCOUVER
DISTRICT OF WEST
VANCOUVER
CITY OF
WHITE ROCK
Metro Vancouver sustainability framework
Since 2002 Metro Vancouver has formally put the concept of sustainability at the centre of its operating and
planning philosophy and advanced its role as a leader in the attempt to make the region one which is explicitly
committed to a sustainable future. This comprehensive endeavour became known as the Sustainable Region Initia-
tive, or more familiarly as the ‘SRI’. In 2008, Metro Vancouver’s Board adopted a Sustainability Framework
outlining its vision, mission, values, sustainability imperatives, and sustainability principles. Depicted in Figure 1,
the Sustainability Framework provides the foundation for Metro Vancouver’s suite of plans, including the Drink-
ing Water Management Plan (DWMP).
regional Vision
Metro Vancouver has an opportunity and a vision to achieve what humanity aspires to on a global basis – the
highest quality of life embracing cultural vitality, economic prosperity, social justice and compassion, all nurtured
in and by a beautiful and healthy natural environment.
We will achieve this vision by embracing and applying the principles of sustainability, not least of which is an
unshakeable commitment to the well-being of current and future generations and the health of our planet, in
everything we do.
As we share our efforts in achieving this vision, we are confident that the inspiration and mutual learning we gain
will become vital ingredients in our hopes for a sustainable common future.
3Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011
...these are the foundation for Metro Vancouver’s three interconnected roles:
rEgioNal VisioN The highest quality of life embracing cultural vitality, economic prosperity, social justice and
compassion, all nurtured in and by a beautiful and healthy natural environment. Achieved by an unshakeable
commitment to the well-being of current and future generations and the health of our planet, in everything we do.
METro VaNCoUVEr rolE aND MissioN Serve the region and attain excellence in meeting these responsibilities.
Plan for the future by developing and using an integrated system of plans. Facilitate collaboration with local
governments and citizens.
ValUEs Integrity is our foundation. Passion for our work and pride in our accomplishments are our drivers.
Respect for the public and compassion in our relationships are our guideposts.
sUsTaiNabiliTY iMPEraTiVEs Have regard for local and global consequences and long-term impacts. Recognize
and reflect the interconnectedness and interdependence of systems. Be collaborative.
sUsTaiNabiliTY PriNCiPlEs Protect and enhance the natural environment. Provide for ongoing prosperity.
Build community capacity and social cohesion.
The Metro Vancouver Sustainability Framework
METriCs, TargETs and kEY DEliVErablEs
Progress towards a sustainable region is measured by
which establish strategic priorities and key activities
figure 1 Metro Vancouver’s Sustainability Framework
Physical & Social DevelopmentEnvironmentUtilities
services
Providing services to
local governments and
their communities
Policy
Developing and using
an integrated system
of plans; includes
some regulatory
responsibilities
Political forum
building and facilitating
collaborative processes
among governments
and citizens Drinking WaterLiquid WasteSolid WasteParks and GreenwaysAir QualityClimate Change and EnergyEcological HealthGrowth ManagementRegional Emergency ManagementFood SystemAffordable HousingOther issues
including:
Transportation
Policing
Economic Dev’t
Ports
1
2
3 Cultural Grants and Information
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 20114
roles and responsibilities
Metro Vancouver and its municipalities work together
to supply clean, safe drinking water to more than 2.3
million people and associated businesses in the Metro
Vancouver region. In this Drinking Water Management
Plan reference to Metro Vancouver usually means the
Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) and refer-
ence to municipalities means GVWD member munici-
palities and member treaty first nation, Tsawwassen
First Nation. Metro Vancouver owns and operates the
water supply, treatment and regional water supply
system while municipalities own and operate the local
water distribution systems to supply water to residents
and businesses. Homeowners, building owners, indus-
try, commercial businesses, and institutions also have
a role and responsibility in ensuring their piping systems
are in good order once water enters their property.
Metro Vancouver and its municipalities are taking steps
to improve water monitoring and metering systems,
to improve energy efficiency, and to implement what
can be considered the 5Rs of resource management
(reduce, reuse, reclaim, recover, and respect the use of
water for other purposes). This updated DWMP pro-
vides the direction and priority for drinking water
initiatives in a sustainable context.
Context for the Drinking Water Management Plan
history
The forested Capilano, Seymour, and Coquitlam Water-
sheds are the source of water supply for Metro Van-
couver. Access to these mountainous watersheds is
restricted and these protected watersheds have long
been a key component in the region’s water supply
system. In 2005, the Board of the Greater Vancouver
Water District approved the Drinking Water Manage-
ment Plan (DWMP) for Metro Vancouver and its
member municipalities. In 2007, the Plan was amended
to fully incorporate management of the source water-
sheds. Since that time, a number of changes have
occurred to improve the quantity and quality of water,
the most notable being the commissioning of the
Seymour-Capilano Filtration Plant.
trends, challenges, opportunities
Metro Vancouver currently has sufficient quantities of
water from its source watersheds to meet the region’s
needs until at least mid-century. Water continues to
be a key economic, social, and environmental driver
but demand for this resource will increase with time.
The region is expected to grow by 35,000 people per
year for the next few decades. Population growth will
place demands not only on water supply, but also on
water infrastructure if not carefully planned. While
climate change predictions do not show a large shift
in the amount of precipitation for the region, they do
indicate that snow packs at lower elevations will
decrease, springs will be earlier, and summers will be
longer. These predicted changes in climate may place
more stress on the drinking water supply system. In
addition, predicted increases in storm activity during
the rainy season may result in increased slope failures
and river channel instability leading to increased tur-
bidity in source reservoirs and increased treatment
costs. Further opportunities can be identified to con-
tinue the trend of declining per-capita water use.
5Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011 5
Provincial government oversight of
Drinking water Systems
British Columbia’s health authorities have a key role
in providing provincial government oversight of drink-
ing water systems. In particular, provincial government
direction on provision of safe drinking water is admin-
istered locally by drinking water officers, public health
engineers and medical health officers through issuance
of an operating permit. The Metro Vancouver drinking
water system is built and operated as one water system
with portions of the system in the two Health Authori-
ties that cover the Lower Mainland; Vancouver Coastal
Health, and Fraser Health. The Vancouver Coastal
Health drinking water officers provide surveillance and
monitoring of those aspects of Metro Vancouver’s drink-
ing water systems that may affect public health. They
also administer and enforce the Drinking Water Protec-
tion Act, the Drinking Water Protection Regulation
and the Health Act (Figure 2).
figure 2 roles and responsibilities in the provision of safe drinking water sourced from Metro Vancouver’s
watersheds
Ministry of health
creates and “owns” Drinking water
Protection act and regulation
health authority
administration & enforcement of
legislation / regulation
Water system owners
Metro Vancouver, Municipalities &
treaty First nations
(Provision of Safe Drinking water +
notification of water Quality Problems)
bC Water and
Waste association
and others
education & training
Providers
environmental
operations
certification Program
building owners
Public and End Users
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 20116
Drinking water officers and public health engineers are
contacted prior to the alteration of the drinking water
system regarding construction permits and changes to
operating permits. Water suppliers, such as Metro
Vancouver and municipalities, have the water from
their systems analyzed for the presence of microbiologi-
cal pathogens and other indicator organisms by labo-
ratories approved by the Provincial Health Officer.
From a water allocation or water quantity perspective,
the Provincial Water Act is central to the water gover-
nance framework. The Provincial Water Act was last
changed in 2004, driven primarily by growing concerns
for the protection of drinking water quality. In addition
to a new Drinking Water Protection Act, the 2004 Water
Act amendments provided B.C. with its first mecha-
nisms to protect groundwater and a process for water-
shed management planning to address or prevent
conflicts among or between water users and the envi-
ronment, and the protection of water quality.
aligning with Provincial initiatives
The strategies and actions identified in the Drinking
Water Management Plan (DWMP) align with the
following recent Provincial initiatives:
aCTioN PlaN for safE DriNkiNg WaTEr iN
briTish ColUMbia
This plan includes comprehensive legislation and mea-
sures to protect drinking water from source to tap by
improving monitoring, treatment, reporting, and
accountability to the public. The Province’s Action
Plan sets out specific principles and actions to ensure
British Columbians enjoy safe, clean, healthy drinking
water as effectively, efficiently, and reliably as possible.
The DWMP addresses all these concerns and continues
to update them as required as best management prac-
tices evolve.
liViNg WaTEr sMarT:
briTish ColUMbia’s WaTEr PlaN
Water Smart objectives supported by the DWMP
include supporting rainwater harvesting and water
reclamation actions, helping to address the impacts of
climate change, and implementing actions that result
in matching water quality to usage requirements.
WaTEr sUsTaiNabiliTY aCT (ProPosED rEVisioN To
ThE WaTEr aCT)
This proposed new act would revise the Water Act to
lessen our water footprint and transition to a new way
of managing water. This includes a number of water
policies that propose to improve water use efficiency,
conservation, protect stream health and aquatic envi-
ronments, and regulate water during scarcity.
bC CliMaTE aCTioN PlaN
This Plan sets a provincial target of 33 percent less
greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 and 80 percent by
2050. The DWMP contributes to meeting these targets
by prioritizing gravity systems where possible, assessing
hydropower at existing reservoir dams, recovering
energy where feasible and upgrading pump
technologies.
iNTEgraTED rEsoUrCE rECoVErY
Integrated Resource Recovery (IRR), formally defined
by the Province in 2008 in a report titled Resources
from Waste: A Guide to Integrated Resource Recovery,
is a concept and approach that integrates the manage-
ment of water, wastewater, energy, and solid waste
services to recover resources and value to help increase
resiliency.
7Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011
coordinating with other Metro Vancouver Plans
The Drinking Water Management Plan is one plan among a suite of interconnected management plans developed
around Metro Vancouver’s Sustainability Framework (Figure 3). The following section summarizes key links
between Metro Vancouver’s plans and outlines where actions identified in other Metro Vancouver plans affect the
Drinking Water Management Plan, and conversely where actions in this DWMP make a contribution to the goals
of other Metro Vancouver plans.
Air Quality
Regional
Growth Finance
DrinkingWater
FoodSystem
Liquid
Waste
Parks &Greenways
Housing SolidWaste
figure 3 Metro Vancouver’s interconnected Management Plans
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 20118
Linkages Between Metro Vancouver Plans
iNTEgraTED liQUiD WasTE aND rEsoUrCE MaNagEMENT PlaN
Support of on-site rainwater
management and actions to reclaim
water contribute to the sustainable use
of water in the region.
DRINKING WATER
MANAGEMENT
PLAN
Support for using non-potable water
for appropriate uses.
Actions that support improvements
in water conservation and reuse
should reduce the amount of
wastewater that has to be treated at
wastewater treatment plants.
rEgioNal groWTh sTraTEgY
A compact urban area uses
infrastructure more efficiently and
places less demand on the overall
system, specifically in terms of outdoor
water use.
DRINKING WATER
MANAGEMENT
PLAN
Provision of clean, safe drinking
water is integral to complete
communities and a sustainable
economy.
Protected watersheds are a large
portion of the region’s conservation
lands.
iNTEgraTED soliD WasTE aND rEsoUrCE MaNagEMENT PlaN
Programs that inform and educate
the public of the benefits of waste
reduction support the objectives of the
Tap Water Campaign.
DRINKING WATER
MANAGEMENT
PLAN
Success in the Tap Water Campaign
will reduce the amount of waste
associated with bottle water use.
outPutinPut
outPutinPut
outPutinPut
Table 1 Metro Vancouver Management Plan linkages
9Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011
Linkages Between Metro Vancouver Plans
rEgioNal fooD sYsTEMs sTraTEgY
Support for adoption of environmentally
sustainable irrigation practices and
technologies will minimize agricultural
demand for water.
DRINKING WATER
MANAGEMENT
PLAN
Provision of clean, safe drinking
water is a necessary input for food
processing and agricultural use.
Efforts to promote water
conservation and reclaimation will
reduce demand on the region’s
water resources making more water
available for in-stream use.
air QUaliTY MaNagEMENT PlaN
Reducing deposition of air contaminants
will minimize the contamination of
water resources and foster the provision
of clean, safe drinking water.
DRINKING WATER
MANAGEMENT
PLAN
Ensuring that drinking water is
produced, distributed, and used
efficiently will minimize energy
consumption and associated
greenhouse gases.
rEgioNal Parks aND grEENWaYs PlaN
Expanding the regional greenways
system will involve working with water
and wastewater utilities.
DRINKING WATER
MANAGEMENT
PLAN
Public access in the Lower Seymour
Conservation Reserve provides
opportunities for recreational
activities, outdoor experiences, and
programs to foster environmental
stewardship.
outPutinPut
outPutinPut
outPutinPut
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 201110
goal 1:
Provide Clean, Safe
Drinking Water
Metro Vancouver and its municipalities are committed
to providing reliable access to adequate quantities of
clean, safe drinking water to the citizens and businesses
of Metro Vancouver.
ParT TWo:
goals, sTraTEgiEs and aCTioNs
strategy 1.1 Use a risk management
multi-barrier approach from source to tap
Beginning with protected source watersheds, the region’s
water supply system provides multiple barriers to con-
tamination. Projects such as the Seymour-Capilano
Filtration Plant and the addition of the ultraviolet
treatment plant at Coquitlam will further reduce the
risks to water quality.
METro VaNCoUVEr Will:
1.1.1 Complete the Seymour-Capilano Filtration
Project. 2013
1.1.2 Improve the primary disinfection treatment
of Coquitlam source water for Cryptosporidium
by adding ultraviolet treatment. 2013
1.1.3 Complete the reassessment of the second-
ary disinfection system after completion of the
Seymour-Capilano Filtration Project. 2016
oN-goiNg aCTioNs
1.1.4 Preserve water quality in the Metro Van-
couver system by utilizing best management
practices that include urban reservoir cleaning
and circulating water to maintain appropriate
chlorine levels.
1.1.5 Monitor water supply and water quality
and use this information to optimize source water
treatment, operation of the Metro Vancouver
water system and rechlorination programs, and
communicate system changes to agencies and
municipalities as appropriate.
11Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011
1.1.6 Implement, administer, and maintain
backflow prevention and cross-connection control
programs within the Metro Vancouver system to
protect the public water system from hazards
originating on customers’ premises or from tem-
porary connections.
1.1.7 Ensure continuous improvement for the
management and operation of the Metro Van-
couver water system by ongoing application of
Metro Vancouver’s Management System for
Drinking Water.
1.1.8 Present an annual Metro Vancouver Water
Quality Report to the Board of Directors.
MUNiCiPaliTiEs Will:
1.1.9 Complete the reassessment of the second-
ary disinfection system within the municipal
distribution network in coordination with Metro
Vancouver after completion of the Seymour-
Capilano Filtration Project. 2016
oN-goiNg aCTioNs
1.1.10 Monitor water quality in the municipal
distribution systems and use this information to
optimize water quality through operation of the
municipal water system.
1.1.11 Preserve water quality in the distribution
system through proactive maintenance programs
that include water main flushing, cleaning of
municipal reservoirs, and eliminating dead-ends
where possible.
1.1.12 Implement, administer, and maintain
backflow prevention and cross-connection control
programs within the municipal distribution
system to protect the public water system from
hazards originating on customers’ premises or
from temporary connections.
strategy 1.2 Manage watersheds to
provide clean, safe water
Metro Vancouver’s closed and protected watersheds
minimizes human access and human activity and sig-
nificantly reduces the risk from microbiological or
chemical contamination and fires.
METro VaNCoUVEr Will:
1.2.1 Where feasible and appropriate, restore
disturbed areas and deactivate watershed roads
that are no longer required to minimize the risk
of landslides and erosion, and reduce long-term
maintenance costs. 2013
oN-goiNg aCTioNs
1.2.2 Provide reliable and timely information
on source water quality, stream flow, and fire risk
to minimize risks to water quality, manage source
reservoirs and optimize water treatment.
1.2.3 Manage the watersheds with a minimum
intervention approach. Intervention is only nec-
essary for building infrastructure or if there are
risks to water quality or human safety.
1.2.4 Work in cooperation with adjoining
municipalities and other organizations with infra-
structure on watershed lands to minimize risks
to water quality.
1.2.5 Reduce the risk from microbiological or
chemical contamination by restricting access to
the source watersheds as specified in Metro Van-
couver’s Watershed Access Policy.
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 201112
strategy 1.3 Identify and secure
additional water supplies for the region
By making greater use of the storage capacity of
Coquitlam reservoir our present sources of water offer
a secure water supply that will meet our needs until
about mid-century.
METro VaNCoUVEr Will:
1.3.1 Complete the Seymour-Capilano Filtration
Project and initiate conceptual design of the new
Coquitlam intake facility to access additional
water supplies. 2013
1.3.2 Provide for additional capacity by securing
full access to the Coquitlam source under the
Coquitlam Water Use Plan and the current fore-
cast predicts expanding storage capacity in Sey-
mour and Capilano Watersheds by 2050. The
schedule for storage expansion will be monitored
and storage expanded as needed.
aCTioNs rEQUEsTED of oThEr goVErNMENTs
aND agENCiEs (oN-goiNg aCTioN)
1.3.3 That senior governments, universities, and
research agencies continue to assess the potential
impacts of climate change on the need for addi-
tional water supplies or storage capacity and
advise Metro Vancouver on the results of this
research.
goal 2:
Ensure the Sustainable Use
of Water Resources
By ensuring the sustainable use of water resources, the
region can continue to grow and prosper while sustain-
ing our quality of life and our environment.
strategy 2.1 Use drinking water
sustainably
Metro Vancouver and its municipalities are committed
to pursuing demand management strategies where
using water more sustainably will contribute to eco-
nomic prosperity, community well-being and environ-
mental integrity.
METro VaNCoUVEr Will: (oN-goiNg aCTioNs)
2.1.1 Deliver education programs promoting
behaviour change by means of:
• sustainability education resources;
• watershed field trips;
• sustainability initiatives at schools;
• information outreach programs promoting
behaviour change and sustainable use of water.
13Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011
2.1.2 Implement a region wide water conserva-
tion program targeting the industrial, commer-
cial, institutional and agricultural sectors in
partnership with municipalities. Program ele-
ments include water audits, informative resources
and case studies.
2.1.3 Deliver the Tap Water Campaign to educate
people about Metro Vancouver’s high quality
drinking water and to reduce the environmental
impact of bottled water.
2.1.4 Set the wholesale water rates and water
rate structure to reflect the cost of regional water
supply, and achieve water conservation and other
sustainability objectives.
2.1.5 Work with the business sector on water
conservation and water reuse initiatives in part-
nership with municipalities.
2.1.6 Develop the Seymour Water Treatment
and Watershed Academy to support innovative
research and demonstration projects.
MUNiCiPaliTiEs Will:
2.1.7 Reassess the merits of developing residen-
tial water metering programs and municipal
rebate programs for water efficient fixtures and
appliances. 2015
oN-goiNg aCTioNs
2.1.8 Develop, implement and enforce consistent
bylaws to encourage water efficiency and imple-
ment Metro Vancouver’s Water Shortage Response
Plan.
2.1.9 Work with the business sector on water
conservation and water reuse initiatives in part-
nership with Metro Vancouver.
2.1.10 Achieve a retail water rate structure that
reflects the cost of regional water supply and, if
practical, the regional seasonal price structure.
2.1.11 Deliver education programs promoting
behaviour change and sustainable use of water.
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 201114
strategy 2.2 Match water quality to
usage requirements
Many of the purposes for which drinking water is currently
used do not require use of water of potable quality.
METro VaNCoUVEr Will:
2.2.1 Install facilities for water reclamation at
wastewater treatment plants to provide reclaimed
water for use within and outside wastewater plants
where feasible. 2011-2016
oN-goiNg aCTioN
2.2.2 Evaluate alternatives to potable water for
specific purposes, including:
• rainwater harvesting for irrigation;
• greywater and reclaimed wastewater for resi-
dential, commercial, institutional, and agri-
cultural use;
• groundwater for irrigation;
• river and sea water for waterfront businesses.
MUNiCiPaliTiEs Will:
2.2.3 Update municipal bylaws, utility design
standards and neighbourhood design guidelines
to enable and encourage on-site rainwater man-
agement as appropriate, so that it can be used
for non-potable purposes such as irrigation. 2014
aCTioNs rEQUEsTED of oThEr goVErNMENTs,
agENCiEs, aND assoCiaTioNs:
(oN-goiNg aCTioNs)
2.2.4 Revise the provincial health regulations to
allow specific residential and commercial uses of
non-potable water (greywater and rainwater) after
discussions with Metro Vancouver and
municipalities.
2.2.5 Facilitate networking for re-use of process
wastewater with business associations, institu-
tions, and non-governmental organizations.
15Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011
strategy 2.3 Manage and protect
watersheds as natural assets
Managing and protecting watershed lands and their
biological diversity as natural assets and as part of the
region’s conservation lands significantly advances
regional sustainability
METro VaNCoUVEr Will: (oN-goiNg aCTioNs)
2.3.1 Manage watershed lands and their biologi-
cal diversity to advance regional sustainability.
2.3.2 Manage the on-drainage watershed lands
with a minimum intervention approach.
2.3.3 Protect and conserve fish populations while
continuing to provide clean, safe drinking water.
2.3.4 Provide non-motorized recreational oppor-
tunities on off-drainage watersheds lands where
appropriate.
2.3.5 Develop and implement a Joint Water Use
Plan for the Seymour and Capilano
Watersheds.
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 201116
goal 3:
Ensure the Efficient Supply
of Water
Efficient supply of water optimizes capacity and defers
the need for new infrastructure and new water supply
sources. Equally important is renewing and replacing
the region’s aging water transmission and distribution
systems in an affordable way.
strategy 3.1 Manage infrastructure
proactively
Managing infrastructure proactively will ensure cost-
effective, reliable and sustainable water supply.
METro VaNCoUVEr Will: (oN-goiNg aCTioNs)
3.1.1 Develop and implement an Asset Manage-
ment Plan targeted at maintaining delivery of
reliable and cost-effective drinking water services
to the region over the next 100 years.
3.1.2 Renew and replace aging infrastructure to
maintain required levels of service based on risk
analyses (including seismic risk) and cost-benefit
priorities.
3.1.3 Undertake cost-effective leak identification
and repair programs targeting water transmission
mains with high breakage rates or that are older
than 50 years.
3.1.4 Implement, where feasible and appropriate,
pressure reduction or pressure management pro-
grams (including pressure transients) to reduce
leakage and potentially extend the life of the
infrastructure.
3.1.5 Conduct hazard assessments specific to
trespassing, excavations over pipes and pressure
loss and implement emergency and security pro-
grams to reduce risks.
3.1.6 Upgrade the energy efficiency of the system
by prioritizing gravity systems and where possible
recovering surplus energy and upgrading pump
and motor efficiencies.
3.1.7 Upon completion of a Joint Water Use
Plan for the Capilano and Seymour Watersheds,
assess the feasibility of developing hydropower
at the Cleveland and Seymour Falls dams.
MUNiCiPaliTiEs Will: (oN-goiNg aCTioNs)
3.1.8 Renew and replace aging infrastructure to
maintain required levels of service based on risk
analyses and cost-benefit priorities specific to the
needs of each municipality.
3.1.9 Undertake cost-effective leak identification
and repair programs targeting the municipal
water system.
3.1.10 Implement, where feasible and appropri-
ate, pressure reduction or pressure management
programs (including pressure transients) to reduce
leakage and potentially extend the life of the
infrastructure.
17Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 2011
oN-goiNg aCTioNs
3.2.2 Based on the projected growth in popula-
tion and economic activity in Metro Vancouver’s
approved Regional Growth Strategy, plan and
construct required Metro Vancouver facilities.
3.2.3 Install water meters on all new municipal
system connections to Metro Vancouver’s water
mains.
3.2.4 Further enhance lawn sprinkling regula-
tions to address both seasonal and peak day con-
sumption issues in partnership with
municipalities.
MUNiCiPaliTiEs Will: (oN-goiNg aCTioN)
3.2.5 Further enhance lawn sprinkling regula-
tions to address both seasonal and peak day con-
sumption issues in partnership with other
municipalities and Metro Vancouver.
strategy 3.2 Optimize capacity through
effective partnerships
Gaining efficiency and optimizing capacity through
more effective communications and partnerships
enables more to be done with less.
METro VaNCoUVEr Will:
3.2.1 Maintain a system of seasonal pricing and
confirm that the cost of providing water in the
summer season continues to be 1.25 times the
cost of providing water during the remainder of
the year and make seasonal pricing adjustments
accordingly. 2014
Drinking Water Management Plan JUNE 201118
PErforMaNCE MEasUrEs
The following performance measures will monitor
progress in achieving the goals of the Drinking Water
Management Plan (DWMP). Performance should be
considered in the context of industry standards and
performance by other utilities in other jurisdictions.
Goal 1: Provide Clean, Safe
Drinking Water
1. Treated water samples negative for E. coli
bacteria (striving for 100%).
2. Treated water samples negative for total coli
forms (striving for high percentages).
3. Percent of untreated source water samples
exceeding 20 E. coli/100 ml (striving for low
percentage).
Goal 2: Ensure the Sustainable
Use of Water Resources
4. Per capita water use by residential customers
(trend over time and compare to other
jurisdictions).
5. Per capita water use by all customers (trend over
time and compare to other jurisdictions).
6. Peak day per capita water use by all customers
(trend over time and compare to other
jurisdictions).
7. Greenhouse gases generated in treating and
delivering water (per cubic meter of water
delivered by Metro Vancouver and net of energy
recovery).
Goal 3: Ensure the Efficient
Supply of Water
8. Metro Vancouver’s Water Rate (trend over time
and compare changes in Metro Vancouver to
changes in other jurisdictions).
9. Metro Vancouver’s drinking water budget (trend
over time and compare changes in Metro Vancouver
to changes in other jurisdictions).
10. Kilowatt hours of energy used in treating and
delivering water (per cubic meter of water delivered
by Metro Vancouver and net of energy recovery).
adaptive Management
As the region grows and changes, the science of water
management improves, and public values evolve, the
DWMP will be reviewed and revised. An adaptive
management approach is proposed with a DWMP
progress report every two years and a comprehensive
review of the plan every five years.
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012
and Members of Council FILE NO: E03-012-001
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The District of Maple Ridge (District) operates a Municipal Water Utility under permit by the Fraser
Health Authority (FHA) that requires an annual report be prepared and submitted to the FHA and be
available to the public. The report follows the format required by the FHA and is necessarily a largely
technical report. To assist the general public, a less technical brochure has been produced and will
be available on the District’s website and at the Municipal Hall Customer Service Centre.
This report is for information and the attached “Drinking Water Quality Report 2011” includes an
outline of the regulatory framework, water quality monitoring data for 2011, and explanatory
comments on the data. A copy of the report will be placed in the public library and on the corporate
website as part of the public information strategy.
In 2011, water quality within the District’s municipal water distribution system met the standards
detailed in the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation.
RECOMMENDATION:
This report is for information only and no resolution is required.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The District operates a Municipal Water Utility under the provisions of the provincial Local
Government Act, and under permit by the Provincial Ministry of Health Services - Fraser
Health Authority (FHA). Water quality requirements are stipulated by the Provincial Drinking
Water Protection Regulations and administered by the FHA.
The District, as a distributor and purveyor of drinking water, is reliant on the Greater
Vancouver Water District (GVWD) for source water quality control. Treated water is delivered
to the District by the GVWD via a transmission main and the 248 Street Reservoir. While
Coquitlam Lake is the primary source of water delivered to Maple Ridge, the GVWD can
supply Maple Ridge with Seymour Lake water in the event of disruptions at Coquitlam Lake.
The District’s drinking water system operating permit requires a water quality monitoring
program and that an annual report be prepared and submitted. While the monitoring
program provides a representative picture of drinking water quality within municipal mains, it
1111
does not provide a definite picture of drinking water quality within buildings, where water
quality can change significantly due to pipe materials, standing times, temperature, and
other factors. It can be assumed that samples taken within buildings may be of different
quality than those taken from municipal mains. The District is not responsible for
testing/verifying water quality on private property.
The District’s water distribution infrastructure includes 379 km of water main, over 18,000
connections, 7 pump stations, 6 reservoirs, and 5 re-chlorination stations.
Samples from 18 locations in the distribution system are taken weekly and are analyzed by
Metro Vancouver. The results are sent to the Operations and Engineering Departments and
to the FHA for review. In 2011, no samples tested positive for E. coli, and no samples
exceeded the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation microbiological standard of 10 total
coliforms per 100mL.
b) Strategic Alignment:
Financial Management
Council has directed that the District provide high quality municipal services to our citizens
and customers in a cost effective and efficient manner. The annual water quality monitoring
program is intended to ensure that the water delivered by the District’s utility is of high
quality.
Smart Managed Growth
The Corporate Strategic Plan directs that municipal infrastructure be protected and managed
through the preparation of appropriate plans to ensure maintenance of the system. A
systematic water quality monitoring plan assists in ensuring that an effective water
distribution system is managed and maintained.
Intergovernmental Relations/Partnerships
Council has directed that the District develop and maintain strong positive working
relationships with the GVWD and other governmental agencies.
The District currently benefits from good working relationships with the GVWD and FHA in the
cooperative provision of quality drinking water. The annual monitoring program and report
facilitates this effective relationship.
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Maple Ridge water utility customers expect that the investment in the network be maintained
to provide safe, reliable and high quality water. The annual reporting of water quality is a
means to meet the accountability that customers expect. Ongoing improvements by Metro
Vancouver will continue to improve regional water quality.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
As part of the Public Works and Development Services Division, the Engineering and
Operations Departments collaborate in the water utility’s planning, management, operation,
maintenance and water quality reporting to meet water quality objectives.
e) Policy Implications:
The reporting of water quality is consistent with the public policy approach of transparency
and accountability as well as meeting the requirements of the FHA.
CONCLUSIONS:
The District monitored drinking water quality in 2011 in accordance with the Provincial mandate.
Testing indicated that all samples met the standards detailed in the provincial Drinking Water
Protection Regulation. The “Drinking Water Quality Report 2011” documents the water quality
monitoring program and test results. The document was prepared in accordance with Fraser Health
Authority requirements and will be available to the public.
“Original signed by David Pollock”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: David Pollock, PEng.
Municipal Engineer
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
General Manager: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule
______________________________________________
Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
JD/mi
Attachment: District of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE
DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT
2011
June 4, 2012
DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT 2011
Table of Contents
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1
2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 2
3 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................... 3
3.1 SOURCE WATER ........................................................................................................................................... 3
3.2 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ............................................................................................................................... 3
3.3 FACILITY MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................................................. 3
3.4 RE-CHLORINATION STATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 4
4 REGULATED DRINKING WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS ........................................................................... 5
4.1 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING AND MONITORING ......................................................................................... 5
4.2 BACTERIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RESULTS ....................................................................................... 5
5 UNREGULATED DRINKING WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS ...................................................................... 8
6 RESPONSE TO POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION .......................................................................................... 12
7 PUBLIC HEALTH MESSAGE FROM THE MEDICAL HEALTH OFFICER ....................................................... 12
8 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 12
APPENDIX A: METRO VANCOUVER COQUITLAM SOURCE WATER QUALITY
APPENDIX B: SAMPLING STATION LOCATIONS
APPENDIX C: AVERAGE FREE CHLORINE RESIDUAL
APPENDIX D: DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS AND pH
APPENDIX E: METALS AND VINYL CHLORIDE
APPENDIX F: METALS WITHOUT MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION GUIDELINES
APPENDIX G: FREE CHLORINE AND TURBIDITY CHARTS
APPENDIX H: WEEKLY SAMPLE LAB RESULTS
APPENDIX I: 2012 CAPITAL PROJECT LOCATIONS
APPENDIX J: DRINKING WATER AND THOSE WITH WEAKENED IMMUNE SYSTEMS
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
1
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The District of Maple Ridge (District) is a distributor of water that is supplied and treated by Metro
Vancouver from its Coquitlam Lake source. In 2011, the Municipality supplied water to approximately
69,000 people.
In accordance with the requirements of the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation, the District sends
weekly drinking water samples from 18 locations to a laboratory for analysis. Test results are
communicated to the District and the Fraser Health Authority every week and documented in this
annual report.
In 2011, the District met all regulatory requirements for drinking water quality set in the BC Drinking
Water Protection Regulation:
No samples tested positive for E. coli
For each 30-day period, over 90% of samples had 0 total coliform per 100mL, and no sample
had more than 10 total coliform per 100mL
All water quality objectives suggested by Health Canada were also met:
Results for pH ranged from 6.8 to 7.2 pH units, as per Health Canada guidelines
Turbidity was generally low in 2011, with average turbidity values at all monitoring stations
meeting the target recommended by Health Canada
The running annual average total trihalomethane results ranged by location from 22 to 35 parts
per billion (ppb), less than the Health Canada guidelines of 100 ppb.
The running annual average total haloacetic acid results ranged by location from 38 to 70 ppb,
less than the Health Canada’s suggested 80 ppb.
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
2
2 INTRODUCTION
The District operates a Municipal Water Utility under the provisions of the provincial Local Government
Act, the BC Drinking Water Protection Act, and the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation. These
obligate the District to meet several requirements, including:
operating the utility under permit by the Provincial Ministry of Health Services
engaging in water quality monitoring
The roles and responsibilities the Province, Fraser Health Authority and Metro Vancouver/District of
Maple Ridge (Water System Owners) are shown in Figure One.
Figure One: Agency Responsibilities for Water Quality
The District monitors drinking water quality regularly to ensure regulatory compliance. Moreover, the
District checks a wide range of non-regulated water quality parameters to ensure residents are
provided with water that is both safe to drink and aesthetically pleasing . Results for both regulated
and unregulated parameters are presented in this report.
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
3
3 BACKGROUND
The District is supplied with water from the protected and undeveloped Metro Vancouver watersheds.
Drinking water is conveyed to Maple Ridge through large diameter Metro Vancouver transmission mains
and nearly 400km of municipal water distribution pipes.
3.1 SOURCE WATER
Metro Vancouver supplies water to the District through a series of pipes linking Maple Ridge to the
Coquitlam, Seymour and Capilano watersheds. While the Coquitlam watershed is the primary source of
water for Maple Ridge, Metro Vancouver has the ability to convey water from the Seymour watershed to
Maple Ridge in the event of a service disruption at the Coquitlam source. Metro Vancouver is currently
constructing an ultra violet (UV) light disinfection plant at the Coquitlam watershed to enhance the
disinfection capability of its water treatment facility. Construction of UV disinfection plant is scheduled
for completion by 2014.
3.2 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
The District distributes water to businesses, institutions and approximately 69,000 residents. Water
distribution infrastructure includes approximately 379 km of water mains, over 18,000 service
connections, 7 pump stations, and 6 reservoir sites. The Municipality also operates 5 re-chlorination
stations to maintain residual chlorine in the distribution system.
Table 1 identifies the types of material used in the distribution system and their respective lengths.
Over 80 per cent of the District’s mains are ductile iron, most of which are cement mortar lined. The
standard for all new installations is cement mortar lined ductile iron. Internal corrosion within cement
mortar lined ductile iron mains is minimal, which helps maintain good water quality.
Table 1: Maple Ridge’s Distribution Pipe Lengths and Materials
Material Length (km)
Asbestos Cement 54
Cast Iron 11
Ductile Iron 310
PVC 3
Steel 1
TOTAL 379
The distribution system is managed by a team of professionals within the Public Works and
Development Services Division, under the leadership of the General Manager of Public Works and
Development Services. The system is also regulated by Maple Ridge’s Water Service Bylaw 6002-
2001.
3.3 FACILITY MAINTENANCE
Water quality is influenced by water system maintenance and improvement strategies that are
implemented by the District’s Operations and Engineering Departments.
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
4
Unidirectional Flushing
Unidirectional flushing is a method of cleaning sediment and material accumulation from water
mains. Unidirectional flushing involves manipulating valves and discharging water through fire
hydrants or blow off points. The discharged water carries sediment and other solids with it, thus
cleaning the mains. The District cleaned 72km of mains (19% of the system) in 2011 using this
method. In support of summer water conservation efforts, flushing activities for the purpose of
cleaning water mains are performed only between October and May.
Reservoirs
Water reservoirs are cleaned to remove sediment and algae which may serve as nutrients to
microorganisms. The District currently cleans its reservoirs on an eight year cycle.
Automatic Hydrant Flushers
An automatic hydrant flusher is in operation at 266 Street and 127 Avenue to improve circulation
and reduce the age of water in nearby water mains. The flusher is operated by automatic timers set
to discharge at various intervals between 9:00 pm and 12:00 am.
Water Main Repairs and Improvements
Water quantity, quality, and reliability can be improved through the repair and strategic replacement
of water mains. Computer modeling and asset management analyses are carried out to identify
future deficiencies in the system and plan improvements. The 2012 water system capital project
locations are identified in Appendix I.
3.4 RE-CHLORINATION STATIONS
Chlorine levels are continually monitored at five locations throughout the distribution system. Additional
chlorine is automatically injected into the drinking water at these locations if detected chlorine levels
are too low. The re-chlorination stations are inspected daily and adjusted as necessary.
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
5
4 REGULATED DRINKING WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
Metro Vancouver and the District are responsible for monitoring water quality in different parts of the
drinking water system. Metro Vancouver is responsible for monitoring the quality of water leaving the
treatment plants and within their transmission mains. The District is responsible for monitoring water
quality in distribution pipes throughout Maple Ridge.
The results of Metro Vancouver’s treated water sampling results and comparisons with Health Canada
Guidelines are presented in Appendix A.
The quality of water distributed within the District is monitored in accordance with requirements set out
in provincial regulations. This section describes the monitoring program and water quality results for
2011.
4.1 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING AND MONITORING
Water quality is monitored for regulatory compliance on a weekly basis at the District’s 18 sampling
locations as well as at Metro Vancouver’s 3 sampling locations within Maple Ridge.
Sampling site locations and codes are illustrated on a map in Appendix B. Samples are taken weekly by
District Operations Department staff and sent to the Metro Vancouver laboratory for analysis. Metro
Vancouver staff analyze the samples and communicate the results to District and Fraser Health staff for
review. Responses to unacceptable results would vary between possibly issuing a boil water advisory to
flushing water mains, depending on the significance of the parameter of concern.
The monitoring program provides a representative picture of drinking water quality within regional and
municipal water mains. However, it does not provide a definitive picture of drinking water quality within
buildings, where water quality can change significantly due to pipe materials, standing times,
temperature, and other factors. It can be assumed that samples taken within buildings will be of
different quality than those taken from municipal mains. The District is not responsible for water quality
on private property.
4.2 BACTERIOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RESULTS
The BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation requires the District to carry out routine sampling and
testing for Escherichia coli and total coliform bacteria. These are considered “indicator organisms,”
because their presence or absence can provide a good indication of microbial water quality. Figures
Two and Three show Metro Vancouver Laboratory technicians processing a water sample and testing it
for the presence of coliform bacteria.
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a type of coliform bacteria present exclusively in the feces of humans and
other animals. The existence of E. coli in a water sample indicates recent fecal contamination and
the possible presence of intestinal disease-causing bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. The BC Drinking
Water Protection Regulation standard for E. coli is none detectable per 100 mL. In 2011, no
samples tested positive for E. coli.
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
6
Figure Two: Metro Vancouver Laboratory
technician processing water sample in
preparation for coliform bacteria check
Figure Three: Metro Vancouver Laboratory
technician checking water sample for coliform
bacteria
Total Coliform
The total coliform group of bacteria is composed of various genera with similar characteristics. The
natural niches for members of this group range from being fecal-specific, such as E. coli, to being
widely distributed in the water, soil, and vegetation. The BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation
standards for total coliform are described in Table 2.
Table 2: BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation Standards for Total Coliform
Occurrence Standard
1 sample in a 30 day period No detectable total coliform per 100mL
More than 1 sample in a 30 day
period
At least 90% of samples have 0 total coliform per 100mL and no
sample has more than 10 total coliform per 100mL
For each 30 day period in 2011, over 90% of samples had 0 total coliform per 100mL, as per the
regulations. No sample had more than 10 total coliform per 100mL. However, total coliforms were
detected in one sample in 2011. The District’s response to the detection of coliforms is to flush the
water main at the test location. Total coliform data for each sample in 2011 is provided in Appendix
H. Table 3 lists the annual number samples found to contain total coliform between 2006 and
2011.
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
7
Table 3: Total Coliform Results by Year
Year Number of
Samples with Total
Coliform
2011 1
2010 3
2009 1
2008 0
2007 5
2006 0
Frequency of Monitoring Samples
The monitoring frequency for the detection of E. coli and total coliforms is stipulated by the BC
Drinking Water Protection Regulation. Current requirements are identified in Table 4. With a total of
18 weekly sampling sites at various points in the District’s water distribution system, the average
number of monthly samples (72) exceeds with the stipulated value of 69 (based on a directly
serviced population of approximately 69,000); Metro Vancouver samples within the District provide
an additional point of reference. As the District’s population grows, additional sampling sites will be
added.
Table 4: Monitoring frequency for the detection of E. coli and total coliforms
Population Served Target No. of Samples per Month
Less than 5,000 4
5,000 to 90,000 1 per 1,000 of population
More than 90,000 90 plus 1 per 10,000 of population in excess of 90,000
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
8
5 UNREGULATED DRINKING WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS
In monitoring unregulated drinking water quality parameters, the District exceeds the Water Quality
Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the GVRD and Member Municipalities. This section reports on the
District’s non-regulatory monitoring.
Heterotrophic Plate Count
Samples are tested for the presence of heterotrophic bacteria to detect possible changes such as
the bacterial quality of the finished water entering the distribution system, temperature, residence
time (i.e., stagnation), the presence or absence of a disinfectant residual, and the availability of
nutrients for growth.
Health Canada does not suggest a maximum acceptable concentration for heterotrophs. Instead, it
recommends that increases in heterotrophic plate count (HPC) concentrations above baseline levels
be considered undesirable.
Table 5 shows the annual number of samples with HPC’s over 500 CFU/mL between 2006 and
2011. In response to HPC count’s at or above this level, the District will re-test and flush water
mains. HPC data for each sample taken in 2011 is provided in Appendix H.
Table 5: HPC Results by Year
Year Number of
Samples with HPC
> 500 CFU/mL
2011 1
2010 1
2009 1
2008 4
2007 1
2006 7
Free Chlorine
Health Canada’s Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality recommends a minimum free
chlorine residual of 0.2 mg/L to limit the growth of biofilm, provide an indication of distribution
system water quality, and to guard against microbiological contamination.
Table 6 and Appendix C show that the average free chlorine residual at all sampling stations
exceeded 0.2 mg/L in 2011. Detailed free chlorine residual data charted in Appendix G and
tabulated in Appendix H indicates that several stations occasionally experienced free chlorine
residuals of less than 0.2 mg/L. Sampling stations having occasional low chlorine concentrations
had no indication of microbiological impairment.
Variations in the concentration of free chlorine residual may be associated with various issues such
as chemical reactions between the chlorine and organic and inorganic chemicals. Residual chlorine
concentrations are also affected by water age, which fluctuates daily as local reservoirs fill and drain.
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
9
Disinfection Byproducts
Disinfection byproducts such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) can form when
the chlorine used to disinfect drinking water reacts with naturally occurring organic matter. Health
Canada considers certain HAA’s and THMS’s to be probably carcinogenic to humans.
In 2011, 16 samples were analyzed for trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids (see Appendix D). The
running annual average THM results ranged by location from 22 to 35 parts per billion (ppb), less
than the Health Canada guidelines of 100 ppb. The running annual average total HAA results ranged
by location from 38 to 70 ppb, less than the Health Canada’s suggested 80 ppb.
Bromodichloromethane (a particular type of THM for which Health Canada publishes a standard)
concentrations were all less than the Health Canada guideline of 16 ppb.
Turbidity
Turbidity, measured in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) is a measure of water clarity. There is no
safe/unsafe level of turbidity, but Health Canada guidelines recommend that turbidity average
around 1.0 NTU and a not exceed 5.0 NTU for more than 2 days in a 12-month period. Turbidity
levels from the Metro Vancouver source waters of Capilano, Seymour and Coquitlam are reported in
the Vancouver Sun and on the Metro Vancouver web site on a daily basis. Turbidity was generally
low in 2011, with average turbidity values below 1 NTU at all sample stations (Table 6). Detailed
Turbidity data for 2011 is charted in Appendix G and tabulated in Appendix H. Variations in turbidity
noted in the table may be associated with turbidity in the source water or occasionally local system
events such as flushing to clean water mains.
pH
pH is a measure of the acid-base equilibrium of water. pH is of concern in a water distribution
system because at low values water becomes corrosive while at high values chlorine disinfection is
less efficient. Health Canada indicates that an acceptable pH range for drinking water is 6.5 - 8.5 pH
units. Eight of the 940 distribution system samples were tested for pH. Test results ranged of 6.8 to
7.2 pH Units (see Appendix D).
Metals
The District tested samples at three monitoring sites for concentrations of various metals. Test
results are shown in Appendix E, along with maximum concentration limits suggested by Health
Canada and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). USEPA values are referenced only
where Health Canada does not recommend a limit. As shown in Appendix E, all measured metal
concentrations were below the limits recommended by Health Canada and the USEPA.
Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA suggest drinking water quality guidelines for calcium, cobalt,
magnesium, molybdenum, nickel or potassium. Additional information related to concentrations of
these metals is provided in Appendix F.
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
10
Table 6: Maple Ridge Sites - 2011 Average Physical Results by Site
Site
Average
Free Chlorine
mg/L
Average
Turbidity
NTU
GV-071 0.85 0.34
GV-072 0.81 0.34
GV-098 0.61 0.33
MPR-431 0.91 0.34
MPR-432 0.87 0.32
MPR-433 0.85 0.34
MPR-434 0.40 0.34
MPR-435 0.34 0.28
MPR-436 0.33 0.26
MPR-437 0.62 0.29
MPR-438 0.37 0.29
MPR-439 0.47 0.26
MPR-440 0.92 0.32
MPR-441 0.76 0.32
MPR-442 0.33 0.32
MPR-443 0.59 0.34
MPR-444 0.41 0.31
MPR-445 0.33 0.25
MPR-446 0.68 0.32
MPR-447 0.35 0.30
MPR-448 0.57 0.29
Temperature
Health Canada sets an aesthetic objective of 15 degrees Celsius for drinking water. Water
temperatures exceeding this objective can result in consumer complaints and the growth of
nuisance organisms that could lead to unpleasant tastes and odours. Figure Four shows that the
average monthly drinking water temperature in Maple Ridge remained below the aesthetic
objective of 15 degrees Celsius throughout the year. Detailed temperature information is
provided in Appendix H.
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
11
Figure Four: Average Monthly Drinking Water Temperature
Vinyl Chloride
The concentration of vinyl chloride was tested in six samples during 2011. As indicated in Appendix
E, all results were non-detectable (less than 0.5 µg/L), less than the Health Canada Guideline of 2
µg/L.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecTemperature (Degrees Celsius)Average Monthly Drinking Water Temperature
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
12
6 RESPONSE TO POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION
In the event that contaminants are detected in the water distribution system, a series of protocols would
be carried out to communicate the event to District and Fraser Health Authority staff. The District and
Fraser Health would then work together to confirm the incident, determine the nature of the risk to
public health and issue public notices as required. Depending on the level of risk, a water quality
advisory, boil water notice, or do-not-use water notice could be issued. Public notices would be
communicated through various media. The District’s contamination response plan is embedded in
emergency planning documents.
7 PUBLIC HEALTH MESSAGE FROM THE MEDICAL HEALTH OFFICER
Fraser Health’s Medical Health Officer has requested that a fact sheet entitled “Drinking Water and
Those with Weakened Immune Systems” be included in this report. The fact sheet is presented in
Appendix J. Additionally, the Medical Health Officer has requested that the following message be
included in this report:
Water from taps that are not used for several hours is good for washing or watering
plants but not for drinking or cooking, as it may contain elevated levels of lead or copper.
Run the water for at least one minute, or until the water is cold before using it for
drinking or cooking. For the same reason never use water from hot taps for drinking or
cooking.
8 CONCLUSION
The District monitored drinking water quality in 2011 in accordance with provincial regulations. 940
drinking water samples were obtained from the municipal water distribution system at 18 sites
throughout the District. Metro Vancouver Laboratory testing indicated that all samples met standards
detailed in the provincial Drinking Water Protection Regulation. The samples also met Health Canada’s
Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality.
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
13
APPENDIX A: METRO VANCOUVER COQUITLAM SOURCE WATER QUALITY
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
14
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
15
APPENDIX B: SAMPLING STATION LOCATIONS
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
16
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
17
APPENDIX C: AVERAGE FREE CHLORINE RESIDUAL
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
18
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
19
APPENDIX D: DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS AND pH
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
20
DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS AND pH
Bromodichloromethane BromoformChlorodibromomethaneChloroformTotal TrihalomethanesRunning Average (Last 4 Quarters)Dibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidTrichloroacetic AcidTotal Haloacetic AcidRunning Average (Last 4 Quarters)Canadian Guideline Limits 16 100 80 6.5-8.5
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.18/05/2010 <1 <1 <1 28 28 <0.5 20 <1 3 27 50
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.14/09/2010 <1 <1 <1 33 33 <0.5 26 <1 <2 73 99
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.23/11/2010 <1 <1 <1 48 48 <0.5 26 <1 3 51 80
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.15/02/2011 <1 <1 <1 25 25 34 <0.5 12 <1 <2 23 36 66
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.10/05/2011 <1 <1 <1 20 20.3 32 <0.5 13 <1 4 20 36.4 63
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.13/09/2011 <1 <1 <1 21 20.8 29 <0.5 8 <1 11 9 27.1 45
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.15/11/2011 <1 <1 <1 37 37.2 26 <0.5 16 <1 12 25 53.4 38
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 18/05/2010 <1 <1 <1 34 34 <0.5 16 <1 2 21 39
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 14/09/2010 1 <1 <1 35 36 <0.5 18 1 3 35 58
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 23/11/2010 <1 <1 <1 40 40 <0.5 21 <1 8 59 88
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 15/02/2011 <1 <1 <1 25 25 34 <0.5 11 <1 <2 19 30 54 7.2
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 10/05/2011 <1 <1 <1 29 29 33 <0.5 15 <1 4 27 46.5 56 6.8
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 13/09/2011 <1 <1 <1 24 24.2 30 <0.5 10 <1 10 8 27.7 48 7.1
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 15/11/2011 <1 <1 <1 39 38.6 29 <0.5 18 <1 10 25 53.2 39 7.0
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.18/05/2010 <1 <1 <1 33 33 <0.5 16 <1 7 20 43
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.14/09/2010 <1 <1 <1 28 28 <0.5 13 <1 5 21 38
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.23/11/2010 <1 <1 <1 47 47 <0.5 22 <1 18 71 111
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.15/02/2011 <1 <1 <1 28 28 34 <0.5 11 <1 2 26 39 58 7.1
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.10/05/2011 <1 <1 <1 33 33.4 34 <0.5 20 <1 5 67 92.4 70 7.0
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.13/09/2011 <1 <1 <1 30 30.1 35 <0.5 <1 <1 8 <0.5 8.5 63 7.2
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.15/11/2011 <1 <1 <1 36 36.1 32 <0.5 10 <1 2 16 28.2 42 7.0
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.18/05/2010 <1 <1 <1 28 28 <0.5 13 <1 5 12 29
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.14/09/2010 <1 <1 <1 23 23 <0.5 17 <1 12 16 45
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.23/11/2010 <1 <1 <1 31 31 <0.5 22 <1 22 32 76
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.15/02/2011 <1 <1 <1 16 16 25 <0.5 14 <1 10 12 36 47
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.10/05/2011 <1 <1 <1 22 21.5 23 <0.5 17 <1 18 16 51 52
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.13/09/2011 <1 <1 <1 19 19.4 22 <0.5 <1 <1 10 <0.5 10.5 43
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.15/11/2011 <1 <1 <1 33 33.4 23 <0.5 25 <1 27 16 68 41
Sample
Date
Sampled
THM (ppb)HAA (ppb)pH units
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
21
APPENDIX E: METALS AND VINYL CHLORIDE
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
22
Metal Concentrations
Sample
Name
Sample
Reported
Name
Date
Sampled
Aluminum Total µg/LAntimony Total µg/LArsenic Total µg/LBarium Total µg/LCadmium Total µg/LCalcium Total µg/LChromium Total µg/LCobalt Total µg/LCopper Total µg/LIron Total µg/LLead Total µg/LMagnesium Total µg/LManganese Total µg/LMercury Total µg/LMolybdenum Total µg/LNickel Total µg/LPotassium Total µg/LSelenium Total µg/LSilver Total µg/LSodium Total µg/LZinc Total µg/Lnone 6 10 1000 5
none50 none 1000 300 10
none50 1
nonenonenone10 none 200,000 5000
50-
200 nonenonenonenonenonenone100
A H H H H H A A H A H H A A A
MPR-
431
Dewdney
Trunk Rd. @
201B St.
7-Jun-11 133 <0.5 <0.5 2.4 <0.2 905 0.14 <0.5 38.1 121 <0.5 112 15.5 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 114 <0.5 <0.5 5340 2
MPR-
431
Dewdney
Trunk Rd. @
201B St.
8-Nov-11 81 <0.5 <0.5 2.4 <0.2 883 0.05 <0.5 39.1 63 <0.5 108 1.8 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 112 <0.5 <0.5 5280 <3
MPR-
435
240 St. South
of Abernethy
Way
7-Jun-11 89 <0.5 <0.5 2.5 <0.2 1080 0.16 <0.5 22.8 77 <0.5 113 9.2 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 123 <0.5 <0.5 5580 1
MPR-
435
240 St. South
of Abernethy
Way
8-Nov-11 80 <0.5 <0.5 2.6 <0.2 1040 <0.05 <0.5 13 61 <0.5 109 1.3 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 113 <0.5 <0.5 5300 <3
MPR-
446
128th Ave
and Willow
Place
7-Jun-11 91 <0.5 <0.5 3.8 <0.2 1610 0.09 <0.5 7.1 106 0.5 103 9.9 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 125 <0.5 <0.5 9250 5.2
MPR-
446
128th Ave
and Willow
Place
8-Nov-11 81 <0.5 <0.5 3.6 <0.2 1460 0.14 <0.5 3.8 74 <0.5 100 1.9 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 121 <0.5 <0.5 9740 6.1
Guidelines for Canadian
Drinking Water Quality
USEPA National Secondary
Drinking Water Regulations
Reason Guideline Established -
Health (H) or Aesthetic (A)
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
23
Vinyl Chloride Concentrations
Sample
Name Location Description Date Sampled
Vinyl
Chloride
µg/L
2
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.7-Jun-11 <0.5
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.1-Nov-11 <0.5
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 7-Jun-11 <0.5
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 1-Nov-11 <0.5
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 7-Jun-11 <0.5
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 1-Nov-11 <0.5
Maximum Acceptable Concentration, as per Health Canada
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
24
APPENDIX F: METALS WITHOUT MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION GUIDELINES
Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA suggest maximum concentration guidelines for calcium, cobalt,
magnesium, molybdenum, nickel or potassium in drinking water. Additional information related to these
metals is provided below.
Calcium
Health Canada reports “there is no evidence of adverse health effects specifically attributable to
calcium in drinking water. Insufficient data are available to set a specific value
for an aesthetic objective for calcium in drinking water. A guideline for calcium has therefore not
been specified….Measurements of water samples collected from 71 municipalities across Canada
showed that the mean calcium concentrations were…21,400 (1,100 to 112,800) µg/L for
distributed water.”1 The maximum concentration of calcium detected in Maple Ridge drinking water
samples was 1,610 µg/L.
Cobalt
Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for cobalt. However,
as a point of reference one might consider that the BC Ministry of Environment recommends that the
maximum concentration of total cobalt not exceed 110 µg/L to “protect aquatic life in the freshwater
environment from acute effects of cobalt.”2 Cobalt
levels were non-detectable (less than 0. 5 µg/L) in all Maple Ridge drinking water samples.
Magnesium
Health Canada reports “there is no evidence of adverse health effects specifically attributable to
magnesium in drinking water. A guideline for magnesium has therefore not been specified. Two
national surveys of drinking water supplies, encompassing 115 municipalities across Canada, were
conducted in 1976 and 1977; magnesium concentrations in distributed water ranged from 200 to
59,500 µg/L.”3 The maximum concentration of magnesium detected in Maple Ridge drinking water
samples was 113 µg/L.
Molybdenum
Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for Molybdenum.
However, as a point of reference one might consider that The BC Ministry of
Environment recommends a maximum of 50 µg/L for various water uses such as irrigation and
drinking water for livestock.4 Molybdenum levels were non-detectable (less than 0.5 µg/L) in all
Maple Ridge drinking water samples.
1 Guidelines For Canadian Drinking Water Quality - Supporting Documents – Calcium, Health Canada (1978,
updated 1987)
2 Ambient Water Quality Guidelines for Cobalt Overview Report, BC Ministry of Environment (2004)
3 Guidelines For Canadian Drinking Water Quality - Supporting Documents – Magnesium, Health Canada
(1978, updated 1987)
4 Water Quality Criteria for Molybdenum Overview Report, BC Ministry of Environment (1986)
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
25
Nickel
Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for nickel. However,
as a point of reference one might consider that the BC Ministry of Environment
recommends a maximum concentration of 8.3 µg/L nickel for marine aquatic life.5 Nickel levels
were non-detectable (less than 0.5 µg/L) in all Maple Ridge drinking water samples.
Potassium
Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for potassium.
However, as a point of reference one might consider that the BC Ministry of
Environment recommends a maximum concentration of 373,000 µg/L potassium for freshwater
aquatic life.6 The maximum concentration of magnesium detected in Maple Ridge drinking water
samples was 125 µg/L.
5 A Compendium of Working Water Quality Guidelines for British Columbia, BC Ministry of Environment
(2008)
6 A Compendium of Working Water Quality Guidelines for British Columbia, BC Ministry of Environment
(2008)
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
26
APPENDIX G: FREE CHLORINE AND TURBIDITY CHARTS
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
27
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -431
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-432
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
28
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-433
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-434
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
29
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-435
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-436
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
30
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-437
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-438
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
31
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-439
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-440
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
32
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-441
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-442
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
33
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-443
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-444
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
34
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-445
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-446
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
35
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-447
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-448
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
36
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MV-071
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MV-072
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
37
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2011 Free Chlorine and Turbidity Data for Sample Site MV-098
Free Chlorine
Turbidity
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
38
APPENDIX H: WEEKLY SAMPLE LAB RESULTS
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
39
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
GV-071 Haney 5-Jan-11 0.61 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-071 Haney 6-Jan-11 0.84 <1 12 <1 0.3
GV-071 Haney 13-Jan-11 0.76 <1 2 <1 0.34
GV-071 Haney 19-Jan-11 0.49 <1 <2 <1 0.82
GV-071 Haney 20-Jan-11 1.2 <1 <2 <1 0.5
GV-071 Haney 26-Jan-11 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-071 Haney 27-Jan-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.78
GV-071 Haney 3-Feb-11 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-071 Haney 10-Feb-11 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-071 Haney 17-Feb-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.35
GV-071 Haney 24-Feb-11 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-071 Haney 28-Feb-11 0.99 <1 <2 <1 0.35
GV-071 Haney 2-Mar-11 0.95 <1 <2 <1 0.38
GV-071 Haney 3-Mar-11 0.77 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-071 Haney 9-Mar-11 0.8 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-071 Haney 10-Mar-11 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-071 Haney 17-Mar-11 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.62
GV-071 Haney 23-Mar-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-071 Haney 24-Mar-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-071 Haney 28-Mar-11 0.86 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-071 Haney 30-Mar-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.35
GV-071 Haney 31-Mar-11 0.91 <1 <2 <1 0.6
GV-071 Haney 4-Apr-11 0.67 <1 <2 <1 0.42
GV-071 Haney 6-Apr-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.36
GV-071 Haney 7-Apr-11 0.64 <1 <2 <1 0.35
GV-071 Haney 12-Apr-11 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.41
GV-071 Haney 15-Apr-11 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.37
GV-071 Haney 21-Apr-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.33
GV-071 Haney 28-Apr-11 0.95 <1 <2 <1 0.11
GV-071 Haney 3-May-11 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.31
GV-071 Haney 5-May-11 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-071 Haney 10-May-11 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.38
GV-071 Haney 12-May-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.36
GV-071 Haney 19-May-11 0.71 <1 <2 <1 0.45
GV-071 Haney 26-May-11 0.52 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-071 Haney 1-Jun-11 0.72 <1 2 <1 0.29
GV-071 Haney 9-Jun-11 0.93 <1 <2 <1 0.31
GV-071 Haney 14-Jun-11 0.8 <1 <2 <1 0.3
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
40
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
GV-071 Haney 16-Jun-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-071 Haney 23-Jun-11 0.91 <1 <2 <1 0.26
GV-071 Haney 27-Jun-11 0.72 <1 <2 <1 0.24
GV-071 Haney 30-Jun-11 0.86 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-071 Haney 7-Jul-11 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-071 Haney 14-Jul-11 0.75 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-071 Haney 21-Jul-11 1 <1 <2 <1 0.36
GV-071 Haney 26-Jul-11 0.97 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-071 Haney 28-Jul-11 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.32
GV-071 Haney 4-Aug-11 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.33
GV-071 Haney 11-Aug-11 0.75 <1 26 <1 0.38
GV-071 Haney 18-Aug-11 0.87 <1 22 <1 0.22
GV-071 Haney 19-Aug-11 0.86 <1 2 <1 0.27
GV-071 Haney 25-Aug-11 0.76 <1 2 <1 0.32
GV-071 Haney 1-Sep-11 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.25
GV-071 Haney 9-Sep-11 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.19
GV-071 Haney 15-Sep-11 0.72 <1 <2 <1 0.22
GV-071 Haney 19-Sep-11 0.77 <1 <2 <1 0.23
GV-071 Haney 22-Sep-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-071 Haney 26-Sep-11 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.25
GV-071 Haney 29-Sep-11 0.64 <1 <2 <1 0.31
GV-071 Haney 4-Oct-11 0.98 <1 <2 <1 0.33
GV-071 Haney 6-Oct-11 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.38
GV-071 Haney 12-Oct-11 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.33
GV-071 Haney 13-Oct-11 1.3 <1 <2 <1 0.32
GV-071 Haney 17-Oct-11 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.37
GV-071 Haney 24-Oct-11 1.1 <1 2 <1 0.29
GV-071 Haney 27-Oct-11 0.94 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-071 Haney 3-Nov-11 0.92 <1 <2 <1 0.27
GV-071 Haney 9-Nov-11 0.75 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-071 Haney 10-Nov-11 0.89 <1 <2 <1 0.26
GV-071 Haney 16-Nov-11 1.3 <1 2 <1 0.3
GV-071 Haney 24-Nov-11 0.98 <1 <2 <1 0.63
GV-071 Haney 30-Nov-11 0.96 <1 4 <1 0.55
GV-071 Haney 7-Dec-11 1.2 <1 <2 <1 0.27
GV-071 Haney 8-Dec-11 1.1 <1 <2 <1 0.32
GV-071 Haney 12-Dec-11 0.54 <1 <2 <1 0.27
GV-071 Haney 15-Dec-11 0.99 <1 <2 <1 0.25
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
41
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
GV-071 Haney 16-Dec-11 0.98 <1 <2 <1 0.26
GV-071 Haney 19-Dec-11 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.31
GV-071 Haney 30-Dec-11 0.78 <1 NA <1 0.43
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 5-Jan-11 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.35
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 6-Jan-11 0.66 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 13-Jan-11 0.66 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 19-Jan-11 0.76 <1 <2 <1 0.8
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 26-Jan-11 0.75 <1 2 <1 0.36
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 31-Jan-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.37
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 2-Feb-11 0.57 <1 <2 <1 0.31
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 8-Feb-11 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.37
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 9-Feb-11 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.36
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 15-Feb-11 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 17-Feb-11 0.76 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 22-Feb-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 23-Feb-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.35
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 28-Feb-11 1.1 <1 <2 <1 0.4
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 2-Mar-11 0.52 <1 <2 <1 0.27
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 2-Mar-11 1.1 <1 2 <1 0.29
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 7-Mar-11 0.51 <1 <2 <1 0.36
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 11-Mar-11 0.62 <1 2 <1 0.36
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 17-Mar-11 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.61
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 22-Mar-11 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.32
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
42
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 25-Mar-11 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.26
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 28-Mar-11 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.32
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 31-Mar-11 1.1 <1 <2 <1 0.91
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 4-Apr-11 0.77 <1 <2 <1 0.47
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 5-Apr-11 0.64 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 11-Apr-11 0.63 <1 <2 <1 0.37
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 13-Apr-11 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.45
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 15-Apr-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.36
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 21-Apr-11 0.78 <1 <2 <1 0.33
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 26-Apr-11 0.64 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 2-May-11 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.27
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 3-May-11 0.75 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 5-May-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 10-May-11 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.47
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 11-May-11 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 16-May-11 0.64 <1 18 2 0.34
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 17-May-11 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.26
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 18-May-11 0.73 <1 2 <1 0.38
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 19-May-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 26-May-11 0.62 <1 <2 <1 0.31
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 1-Jun-11 0.71 <1 2 <1 0.38
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 8-Jun-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.37
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
43
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 9-Jun-11 0.86 <1 <2 <1 0.35
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 14-Jun-11 0.61 <1 <2 <1 0.27
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 16-Jun-11 0.93 <1 <2 <1 0.47
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 23-Jun-11 0.84 <1 18 <1 0.26
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 27-Jun-11 0.69 <1 2 <1 0.3
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 28-Jun-11 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.24
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 30-Jun-11 0.73 <1 6 <1 0.26
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 7-Jul-11 0.89 <1 6 <1 0.33
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 14-Jul-11 0.64 <1 <2 <1 0.31
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 18-Jul-11 1.1 <1 <2 <1 0.23
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 19-Jul-11 0.94 <1 2 <1 0.28
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 22-Jul-11 0.91 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 26-Jul-11 0.79 <1 <2 <1 0.35
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 27-Jul-11 0.67 <1 <2 <1 0.36
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 28-Jul-11 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.36
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 29-Jul-11 0.82 <1 6 <1 0.33
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 4-Aug-11 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.33
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 11-Aug-11 0.77 <1 <2 <1 0.39
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 17-Aug-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.26
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 25-Aug-11 0.61 <1 2 <1 0.31
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 1-Sep-11 0.55 <1 <2 <1 0.26
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 8-Sep-11 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.19
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
44
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 12-Sep-11 1 <1 6 <1 0.32
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 16-Sep-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.25
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 19-Sep-11 0.79 <1 2 <1 0.22
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 20-Sep-11 0.88 <1 <2 <1 0.25
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 23-Sep-11 0.71 <1 2 <1 0.26
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 26-Sep-11 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 27-Sep-11 0.67 <1 2 <1 0.26
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 29-Sep-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 3-Oct-11 0.87 <1 8 <1 0.38
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 4-Oct-11 0.81 <1 4 <1 0.32
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 5-Oct-11 0.61 <1 <2 <1 0.31
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 12-Oct-11 0.7 <1 10 <1 0.4
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 13-Oct-11 1 <1 <2 <1 0.32
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 14-Oct-11 0.97 <1 <2 <1 0.33
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 17-Oct-11 0.9 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 24-Oct-11 1 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 25-Oct-11 0.97 <1 2 <1 0.31
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 27-Oct-11 1.1 <1 4 <1 0.36
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 3-Nov-11 0.97 <1 2 <1 0.3
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 9-Nov-11 0.81 <1 <2 <1 0.32
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 10-Nov-11 1 <1 2 <1 0.27
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 16-Nov-11 1 <1 2 <1 0.28
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
45
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 24-Nov-11 0.8 <1 <2 <1 0.43
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 30-Nov-11 0.98 <1 <2 <1 0.54
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 5-Dec-11 0.87 <1 <2 <1 0.39
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 6-Dec-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.31
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 7-Dec-11 0.88 <1 2 <1 0.28
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 9-Dec-11 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 12-Dec-11 0.94 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 14-Dec-11 0.74 <1
[Spread
er
colonies
.] NA <1 0.29
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 19-Dec-11 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-072
Maple Ridge
Pump Station 29-Dec-11 0.71 <1 NA <1 0.46
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 5-Jan-11 0.67 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 6-Jan-11 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 13-Jan-11 0.53 <1 <2 <1 0.41
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 19-Jan-11 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.83
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 26-Jan-11 0.39 <1 <2 <1 0.33
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 27-Jan-11 0.34 <1 <2 <1 0.37
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 3-Feb-11 0.36 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 10-Feb-11 0.61 <1 <2 <1 0.36
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 16-Feb-11 0.49 <1 <2 <1 0.32
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 17-Feb-11 0.49 <1 <2 <1 0.4
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 24-Feb-11 0.39 <1 <2 <1 0.39
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
46
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 28-Feb-11 0.7 <1 2 <1 0.29
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 2-Mar-11 0.57 <1 <2 <1 0.37
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 3-Mar-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 10-Mar-11 0.6 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 17-Mar-11 0.33 <1 <2 <1 0.41
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 23-Mar-11 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.27
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 24-Mar-11 0.67 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 28-Mar-11 0.57 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 30-Mar-11 0.5 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 31-Mar-11 0.46 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 4-Apr-11 0.52 <1 <2 <1 0.49
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 6-Apr-11 0.75 <1 <2 <1 0.43
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 12-Apr-11 0.44 <1 <2 <1 0.36
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 15-Apr-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.33
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 21-Apr-11 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.42
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 28-Apr-11 0.85 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 3-May-11 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.36
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 5-May-11 0.66 <1 <2 <1 0.31
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 10-May-11 0.57 <1 <2 <1 0.38
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 12-May-11 0.62 <1 <2 <1 0.32
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 19-May-11 0.65 <1 2 <1 0.53
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 26-May-11 0.31 <1 22 <1 0.4
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
47
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 1-Jun-11 0.27 <1 8 <1 0.33
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 9-Jun-11 0.75 <1 2 <1 0.32
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 14-Jun-11 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.27
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 16-Jun-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 23-Jun-11 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.33
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 27-Jun-11 0.43 <1 4 <1 0.34
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 30-Jun-11 0.61 <1 <2 <1 0.28
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 7-Jul-11 0.38 <1 20 <1 0.29
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 14-Jul-11 0.68 <1 <2 <1 0.24
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 21-Jul-11 0.41 <1 6 <1 0.25
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 26-Jul-11 0.7 <1 <2 <1 0.32
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 28-Jul-11 0.64 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 4-Aug-11 0.67 <1 64 <1 0.31
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 11-Aug-11 0.35 <1 44 <1 0.27
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 18-Aug-11 0.42 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 25-Aug-11 0.56 <1 36 <1 0.32
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 1-Sep-11 0.46 <1 <2 <1 0.24
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 9-Sep-11 0.42 <1 10 <1 0.21
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 14-Sep-11 0.47 <1 38 <1 0.2
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 19-Sep-11 0.62 <1 14 <1 0.24
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 22-Sep-11 0.73 <1 12 <1 0.25
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 26-Sep-11 0.69 <1 <2 <1 0.21
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
48
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 29-Sep-11 0.65 <1 <2 <1 0.32
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 4-Oct-11 0.74 <1 400 <1 0.31
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 6-Oct-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.34
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 13-Oct-11 0.67 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 17-Oct-11 0.79 <1 2 <1 0.26
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 24-Oct-11 0.54 <1 <2 <1 0.27
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 27-Oct-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 3-Nov-11 0.73 <1 <2 <1 0.33
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 9-Nov-11 0.56 <1 <2 <1 0.32
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 10-Nov-11 0.72 <1 <2 <1 0.24
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 16-Nov-11 0.63 <1 4 <1 0.27
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 24-Nov-11 0.53 <1 <2 <1 0.3
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 30-Nov-11 0.64 <1 <2 <1 0.58
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 2-Dec-11 0.53 <1 <2 <1 0.48
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 7-Dec-11 0.55 <1 <2 <1 0.29
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 8-Dec-11 0.83 <1 <2 <1 0.46
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 15-Dec-11 0.82 <1 <2 <1 0.27
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 16-Dec-11 0.76 <1 <2 <1 0.26
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 19-Dec-11 0.84 <1 <2 <1 0.39
GV-098
Maple Ridge
Chamber Main 30-Dec-11 0.87 <1 NA <1 0.41
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 4-Jan-11 0.62 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 11-Jan-11 0.89 <1 <2 5 <1 0.4
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
49
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 18-Jan-11 0.78 <1 <2 4 <1 0.94
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 25-Jan-11 0.87 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 1-Feb-11 0.97 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 8-Feb-11 0.98 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 15-Feb-11 0.91 <1 <2 5 <1 0.38
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 22-Feb-11 0.83 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 1-Mar-11 0.93 <1 30 3 <1 0.39
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 8-Mar-11 0.89 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 15-Mar-11 0.75 <1 <2 4 <1 0.56
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 22-Mar-11 0.9 <1 <2 5 <1 0.38
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 23-Mar-11 0.63 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 29-Mar-11 0.78 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 5-Apr-11 0.78 <1 <2 5 <1 0.39
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 12-Apr-11 0.84 <1 <2 5 <1 0.45
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 19-Apr-11 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 26-Apr-11 0.93 <1 <2 6 <1 0.25
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 3-May-11 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 10-May-11 0.99 <1 <2 9 <1 0.42
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 17-May-11 0.8 <1 <2 6 <1 0.37
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 24-May-11 0.88 <1 2 7 <1 0.42
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 31-May-11 0.75 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 7-Jun-11 0.92 <1 2 10 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
50
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 14-Jun-11 0.89 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 21-Jun-11 0.9 <1 4 10 <1 0.33
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 28-Jun-11 0.8 <1 2 12 <1 0.22
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 5-Jul-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.37
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 12-Jul-11 0.83 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 19-Jul-11 0.99 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 26-Jul-11 0.91 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 3-Aug-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.26
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 9-Aug-11 1.1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 16-Aug-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 23-Aug-11 0.84 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 30-Aug-11 0.84 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 6-Sep-11 0.8 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 13-Sep-11 0.83 <1 2 10 <1 0.23
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 20-Sep-11 0.87 <1 <2 12 <1 0.06
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 27-Sep-11 1.1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.32
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 4-Oct-11 0.93 <1 2 11 <1 0.43
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 11-Oct-11 0.93 <1 2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 18-Oct-11 1.1 <1 <2 11 <1 0.24
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 25-Oct-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.33
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 1-Nov-11 1 <1 <2 9 <1 0.26
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 8-Nov-11 0.88 <1 4 9 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
51
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 15-Nov-11 0.92 <1 2 9 <1 0.3
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 22-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 29-Nov-11 1.2 <1 <2 5 <1 0.65
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 6-Dec-11 1.2 <1 2 5 <1 0.34
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 13-Dec-11 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 20-Dec-11 1 <1 2 6 <1 0.29
MPR-
431
Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St. 28-Dec-11 0.81 <1 NA 5 <1 0.32
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 4-Jan-11 0.75 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 11-Jan-11 0.87 <1 <2 3 <1 0.39
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 18-Jan-11 0.94 <1 <2 4 <1 0.77
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 25-Jan-11 0.85 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 1-Feb-11 0.77 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 8-Feb-11 0.76 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 15-Feb-11 0.88 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 22-Feb-11 0.86 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 1-Mar-11 0.9 <1 <2 2 <1 0.31
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 8-Mar-11 0.84 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 15-Mar-11 0.77 <1 <2 3 <1 0.49
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 22-Mar-11 0.76 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 23-Mar-11 0.91 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 29-Mar-11 0.82 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 5-Apr-11 0.93 <1 <2 5 <1 0.45
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
52
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 12-Apr-11 0.88 <1 <2 5 <1 0.43
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 19-Apr-11 0.87 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 26-Apr-11 0.77 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 3-May-11 0.94 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 10-May-11 0.8 <1 <2 9 <1 0.36
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 17-May-11 0.78 <1 <2 5 <1 0.38
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 24-May-11 0.79 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 31-May-11 0.76 <1 <2 10 <1 0.37
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 7-Jun-11 0.81 <1 <2 11 <1 0.37
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 14-Jun-11 0.86 <1 2 7 <1 0.25
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 21-Jun-11 0.87 <1 4 9 <1 0.26
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 28-Jun-11 0.88 <1 <2 9 <1 0.23
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 5-Jul-11 0.86 <1 <2 9 <1 0.27
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 12-Jul-11 0.77 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 19-Jul-11 0.92 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 26-Jul-11 0.93 <1 <2 9 <1 0.28
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 3-Aug-11 0.96 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 9-Aug-11 0.89 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 16-Aug-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 23-Aug-11 0.71 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 30-Aug-11 0.81 <1 <2 11 <1 0.22
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 6-Sep-11 0.78 <1 2 10 <1 0.34
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
53
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 13-Sep-11 0.87 <1 <2 10 <1 0.22
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 20-Sep-11 0.82 <1 <2 11 <1 0.06
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 27-Sep-11 1 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 4-Oct-11 0.84 <1 <2 10 <1 0.37
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 11-Oct-11 0.8 <1 <2 11 <1 0.33
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 18-Oct-11 1.2 <1 <2 9 <1 0.32
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 25-Oct-11 0.95 <1 <2 9 <1 0.34
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 1-Nov-11 1 <1 <2 9 <1 0.29
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 8-Nov-11 0.94 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 15-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.33
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 22-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 29-Nov-11 1.2 <1 <2 5 <1 0.62
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 6-Dec-11 0.88 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 13-Dec-11 0.82 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 20-Dec-11 0.83 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
432
224 St. @ 122
Ave. 28-Dec-11 0.67 <1 NA 7 <1 0.33
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 4-Jan-11 0.73 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 11-Jan-11 0.7 <1 <2 3 <1 0.5
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 18-Jan-11 0.85 <1 <2 5 <1 1
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 25-Jan-11 0.74 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 1-Feb-11 0.63 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 8-Feb-11 0.71 <1 66 5 <1 0.34
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
54
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 15-Feb-11 0.75 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 22-Feb-11 0.92 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 1-Mar-11 0.82 <1 2 3 <1 0.29
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 8-Mar-11 0.74 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 15-Mar-11 0.71 <1 <2 4 <1 0.49
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 22-Mar-11 0.83 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 29-Mar-11 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 5-Apr-11 0.84 <1 <2 5 <1 0.39
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 12-Apr-11 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.41
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 19-Apr-11 0.69 <1 <2 6 <1 0.39
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 26-Apr-11 1.2 <1 <2 5 <1 0.23
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 3-May-11 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 10-May-11 0.68 <1 <2 9 <1 0.39
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 17-May-11 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 24-May-11 0.7 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 31-May-11 0.7 <1 2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 7-Jun-11 0.69 <1 <2 10 <1 0.36
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 14-Jun-11 0.8 <1 <2 8 <1 0.23
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 21-Jun-11 0.78 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 28-Jun-11 0.73 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 5-Jul-11 0.71 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 12-Jul-11 0.71 <1 <2 10 <1 0.21
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
55
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 19-Jul-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.21
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 26-Jul-11 0.8 <1 <2 12 <1 0.34
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 3-Aug-11 0.88 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 9-Aug-11 0.91 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 16-Aug-11 0.99 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 23-Aug-11 0.68 <1 <2 12 <1 0.66
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 30-Aug-11 0.77 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 6-Sep-11 0.44 <1 <2 12 <1 0.2
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 13-Sep-11 0.75 <1 <2 10 <1 0.18
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 20-Sep-11 0.74 <1 <2 11 <1 <0.06
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 27-Sep-11 0.82 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 4-Oct-11 0.76 <1 <2 11 <1 0.36
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 11-Oct-11 0.69 <1 2 11 <1 0.29
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 18-Oct-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 25-Oct-11 0.97 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 1-Nov-11 0.86 <1 4 7 <1 0.26
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 8-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.32
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 15-Nov-11 0.95 <1 4 5 <1 0.36
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 22-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.23
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 29-Nov-11 1.3 <1 <2 5 <1 0.63
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 6-Dec-11 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.94
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 13-Dec-11 0.79 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
56
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 20-Dec-11 1.3 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33
MPR-
433
232 St. North of
130 Ave. 28-Dec-11 0.73 <1 NA 6 <1 0.3
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 4-Jan-11 0.15 <1 <2 3 <1 0.31
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 11-Jan-11 0.49 <1 <2 4 <1 0.43
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 18-Jan-11 0.26 <1 <2 4 <1 0.56
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 25-Jan-11 0.14 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 1-Feb-11 0.16 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 8-Feb-11 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 15-Feb-11 0.28 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 22-Feb-11 0.66 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 1-Mar-11 0.35 <1 <2 3 <1 0.29
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 8-Mar-11 0.5 <1 <2 3 <1 0.27
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 15-Mar-11 0.19 <1 <2 5 <1 0.43
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 22-Mar-11 0.47 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 23-Mar-11 0.21 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 29-Mar-11 0.34 <1 <2 5 <1 0.43
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 5-Apr-11 0.35 <1 <2 4 <1 0.5
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 12-Apr-11 0.61 <1 <2 5 <1 0.39
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 19-Apr-11 0.73 <1 <2 5 <1 0.38
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 26-Apr-11 0.56 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 3-May-11 0.34 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 10-May-11 0.33 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
57
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 17-May-11 0.22 <1 <2 9 <1 0.32
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 24-May-11 0.38 <1 12 9 <1 1.9
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 31-May-11 0.88 <1 2 9 <1 0.32
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 7-Jun-11 0.38 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 14-Jun-11 0.21 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 21-Jun-11 0.18 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 28-Jun-11 0.45 <1 <2 14 <1 0.26
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 5-Jul-11 0.49 <1 4 11 <1 0.32
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 12-Jul-11 0.45 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 19-Jul-11 0.24 <1 <2 14 <1 0.25
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 26-Jul-11 0.23 <1 <2 13 <1 0.29
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 3-Aug-11 0.54 <1 <2 12 <1 0.31
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 9-Aug-11 0.49 <1 2 13 <1 0.29
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 16-Aug-11 0.19 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 23-Aug-11 0.3 <1 <2 14 <1 0.32
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 30-Aug-11 0.46 <1 <2 11 <1 0.25
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 6-Sep-11 0.45 <1 2 13 <1 0.32
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 13-Sep-11 0.49 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 20-Sep-11 0.28 <1 <2 16 <1 0.07
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 27-Sep-11 0.35 <1 2 14 <1 0.21
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 4-Oct-11 0.12 <1 4 12 <1 0.34
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 11-Oct-11 0.29 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
58
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 18-Oct-11 0.31 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 25-Oct-11 0.16 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 1-Nov-11 0.26 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 8-Nov-11 0.55 <1 <2 9 <1 0.35
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 15-Nov-11 0.51 <1 <2 8 <1 0.3
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 22-Nov-11 0.63 <1 <2 7 <1 0.31
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 29-Nov-11 0.41 <1 2 6 <1 0.33
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 6-Dec-11 0.89 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 13-Dec-11 0.64 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 20-Dec-11 0.64 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25
MPR-
434
102 Ave. East of
241A St. 28-Dec-11 0.6 <1 NA 6 <1 0.3
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 4-Jan-11 0.37 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 11-Jan-11 0.38 <1 <2 5 <1 0.39
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 18-Jan-11 0.49 <1 <2 5 <1 0.5
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 25-Jan-11 0.29 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 1-Feb-11 0.22 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 8-Feb-11 0.28 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 15-Feb-11 0.31 <1 <2 5 <1 0.24
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 22-Feb-11 0.67 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 1-Mar-11 0.4 <1 <2 3 <1 0.28
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 8-Mar-11 0.25 <1 <2 4 <1 0.24
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 15-Mar-11 0.26 <1 <2 4 <1 0.37
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
59
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 22-Mar-11 0.38 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 29-Mar-11 0.45 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 5-Apr-11 0.44 <1 <2 5 <1 0.36
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 12-Apr-11 0.37 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 19-Apr-11 0.51 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 26-Apr-11 0.43 <1 <2 5 <1 0.24
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 3-May-11 0.26 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 10-May-11 0.17 <1 <2 7 <1 0.33
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 17-May-11 0.33 <1 <2 8 <1 0.3
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 24-May-11 0.27 <1 <2 8 <1 0.4
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 31-May-11 0.28 <1 2 9 <1 0.27
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 7-Jun-11 0.29 <1 2 11 <1 0.36
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 14-Jun-11 0.39 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 21-Jun-11 0.34 <1 <2 11 <1 0.21
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 28-Jun-11 0.41 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 5-Jul-11 0.4 <1 2 11 <1 0.32
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 12-Jul-11 0.13 <1 <2 14 <1 0.33
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 19-Jul-11 0.23 <1 4 13 <1 0.21
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 26-Jul-11 0.21 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 3-Aug-11 0.19 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 9-Aug-11 0.46 <1 <2 14 <1 0.3
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 16-Aug-11 0.39 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
60
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 23-Aug-11 0.09 <1 6 12 <1 0.26
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 30-Aug-11 0.45 <1 2 14 <1 0.26
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 6-Sep-11 0.38 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 13-Sep-11 0.47 <1 2 13 <1 0.19
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 20-Sep-11 0.29 <1 <2 17 <1 0.06
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 27-Sep-11 0.31 <1 4 13 <1 0.21
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 4-Oct-11 0.11 <1 24 13 <1 0.31
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 11-Oct-11 0.2 <1 8 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 18-Oct-11 0.27 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 25-Oct-11 0.15 <1 8 10 <1 0.25
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 1-Nov-11 0.23 <1 76 11 <1 0.21
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 8-Nov-11 0.31 <1 240 9 <1 0.24
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 15-Nov-11 0.42 <1 52 10 <1 0.23
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 22-Nov-11 0.31 <1 <2 6 <1 0.23
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 29-Nov-11 0.36 <1 170 6 <1 0.29
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 6-Dec-11 0.75 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 13-Dec-11 0.51 <1 <2 5 <1 0.22
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 20-Dec-11 0.47 <1 22 6 <1 0.29
MPR-
435
240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 28-Dec-11 0.5 <1 NA 6 <1 0.29
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 4-Jan-11 0.7 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 11-Jan-11 0.51 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 18-Jan-11 0.37 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
61
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 25-Jan-11 0.53 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 1-Feb-11 0.32 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 8-Feb-11 0.38 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 15-Feb-11 0.22 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 22-Feb-11 0.38 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 1-Mar-11 0.27 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 8-Mar-11 0.45 <1 84 4 <1 0.22
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 15-Mar-11 0.3 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 22-Mar-11 0.22 <1
[Contam
ination.]
LA 5 <1 0.36
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 29-Mar-11 0.23 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 5-Apr-11 0.63 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 12-Apr-11 0.23 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 19-Apr-11 0.37 <1 <2 6 <1 0.26
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 26-Apr-11 0.47 <1 <2 5 <1 0.2
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 3-May-11 0.39 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 10-May-11 0.2 <1 <2 8 <1 0.23
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 17-May-11 0.13 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 24-May-11 0.29 <1 <2 7 <1 0.23
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 31-May-11 0.15 <1 2 11 <1 0.2
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 7-Jun-11 0.41 <1 <2 11 <1 0.3
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 14-Jun-11 0.4 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
62
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 21-Jun-11 0.37 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 28-Jun-11 0.52 <1 2 14 <1 0.2
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 5-Jul-11 0.52 <1 2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 12-Jul-11 0.36 <1 2 14 <1 0.21
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 19-Jul-11 0.26 <1 4 13 <1 0.22
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 26-Jul-11 0.57 <1 <2 13 <1 0.32
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 3-Aug-11 0.56 <1 <2 12 <1 0.45
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 9-Aug-11 0.4 <1 <2 14 <1 0.26
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 16-Aug-11 0.37 <1 <2 15 <1 0.22
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 23-Aug-11 0.24 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 30-Aug-11 0.22 <1 <2 13 <1 0.2
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 6-Sep-11 0.46 <1 <2 15 <1 0.22
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 13-Sep-11 0.51 <1 <2 12 <1 0.18
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 20-Sep-11 0.03 <1 110 17 <1 <0.06
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 27-Sep-11 0.14 <1 340 14 <1 0.2
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 4-Oct-11 0.03 <1 1900 13 <1 0.23
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 11-Oct-11 0.03 <1 120 13 <1 0.27
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 18-Oct-11 0.2 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 25-Oct-11 0.11 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 1-Nov-11 0.29 <1 4 12 <1 0.24
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 8-Nov-11 0.24 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 15-Nov-11 0.06 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
63
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 22-Nov-11 0.17 <1 12 6 <1 0.22
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 29-Nov-11 0.21 <1 <2 7 <1 0.25
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 6-Dec-11 0.42 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 13-Dec-11 0.35 <1 <2 5 <1 0.24
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 20-Dec-11 0.28 <1 <2 5 <1 0.22
MPR-
436
125 Ave. West of
Ansell St. 28-Dec-11 0.45 <1 NA 6 <1 0.26
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 4-Jan-11 1.1 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 11-Jan-11 0.97 <1 <2 5 <1 0.41
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 18-Jan-11 0.98 <1 <2 4 <1 0.78
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 25-Jan-11 0.64 <1 <2 5 <1 0.37
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 1-Feb-11 0.27 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 8-Feb-11 0.75 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 15-Feb-11 0.71 <1 2 5 <1 0.27
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 22-Feb-11 0.45 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 1-Mar-11 1.1 <1 <2 3 <1 0.27
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 8-Mar-11 0.64 <1 <2 3 <1 0.27
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 15-Mar-11 0.89 <1 <2 3 <1 0.44
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 22-Mar-11 0.87 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 29-Mar-11 0.69 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 5-Apr-11 0.68 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 12-Apr-11 0.7 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 19-Apr-11 0.58 <1 <2 6 <1 0.72
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
64
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 26-Apr-11 0.79 <1 <2 5 <1 0.21
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 3-May-11 0.82 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 10-May-11 0.49 <1 2 8 <1 0.25
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 17-May-11 0.65 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 24-May-11 0.54 <1 <2 8 <1 0.29
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 31-May-11 0.56 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 7-Jun-11 0.34 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 14-Jun-11 0.84 <1 2 10 <1 0.21
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 21-Jun-11 0.3 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 28-Jun-11 0.45 <1 <2 12 <1 0.18
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 5-Jul-11 0.35 <1 6 10 <1 0.3
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 12-Jul-11 0.35 <1 <2 12 <1 0.2
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 19-Jul-11 0.44 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 26-Jul-11 0.91 <1 <2 12 <1 0.28
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 3-Aug-11 0.34 <1 <2 12 <1 0.3
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 9-Aug-11 0.31 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 16-Aug-11 0.52 <1 2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 23-Aug-11 0.35 <1 <2 14 <1 0.27
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 30-Aug-11 0.64 <1 2 12 <1 0.22
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 6-Sep-11 0.77 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 13-Sep-11 0.56 <1 2 12 <1 0.17
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 20-Sep-11 0.64 <1 2 15 <1 0.06
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
65
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 27-Sep-11 0.5 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 4-Oct-11 0.3 <1 2 12 <1 0.3
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 11-Oct-11 0.47 <1 4 12 <1 0.31
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 18-Oct-11 0.42 <1 <2 10 <1 0.22
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 25-Oct-11 0.58 <1 <2 9 <1 0.28
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 1-Nov-11 0.71 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 8-Nov-11 0.56 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 15-Nov-11 0.66 <1 <2 9 <1 0.33
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 22-Nov-11 0.75 <1 <2 6 <1 0.22
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 29-Nov-11 0.63 <1 2 6 <1 0.29
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 6-Dec-11 0.78 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 13-Dec-11 0.58 <1 <2 5 <1 0.23
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 20-Dec-11 0.56 <1 2 6 <1 0.3
MPR-
437
248 St. @ 116
Ave. 28-Dec-11 0.62 <1 NA 7 <1 0.27
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 4-Jan-11 0.5 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 11-Jan-11 0.78 <1 <2 4 <1 0.37
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 18-Jan-11 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.46
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 25-Jan-11 0.76 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 1-Feb-11 0.38 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 8-Feb-11 0.51 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 15-Feb-11 0.44 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 22-Feb-11 0.34 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
66
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 1-Mar-11 0.35 <1 <2 3 <1 0.27
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 8-Mar-11 0.55 <1 <2 4 <1 0.24
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 15-Mar-11 0.71 <1 <2 3 <1 0.47
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 22-Mar-11 0.4 <1 <2 5 <1 0.37
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 29-Mar-11 0.24 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 5-Apr-11 0.58 <1 <2 5 <1 0.41
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 12-Apr-11 0.63 <1 <2 5 <1 0.54
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 19-Apr-11 0.55 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 26-Apr-11 0.44 <1 <2 5 <1 0.21
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 3-May-11 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 10-May-11 0.4 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 17-May-11 0.29 <1 <2 9 <1 0.31
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 24-May-11 0.41 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 31-May-11 0.44 <1 <2 9 <1 0.23
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 7-Jun-11 0.24 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 14-Jun-11 0.17 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 21-Jun-11 0.25 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 28-Jun-11 0.44 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 5-Jul-11 0.31 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 12-Jul-11 0.13 <1 <2 10 <1 0.26
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 19-Jul-11 0.05 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 26-Jul-11 0.07 <1 <2 13 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
67
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 3-Aug-11 0.15 <1 2 11 <1 0.28
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 9-Aug-11 0.09 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 16-Aug-11 0.6 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 23-Aug-11 0.34 <1 <2 15 <1 0.25
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 30-Aug-11 0.43 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 6-Sep-11 0.03 <1 <2 14 <1 0.25
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 13-Sep-11 0.05 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 20-Sep-11 0.29 <1 2 15 <1 0.45
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 27-Sep-11 0.27 <1 <2 14 <1 0.24
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 4-Oct-11 0.27 <1 2 13 <1 0.31
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 11-Oct-11 0.08 <1 2 12 <1 0.27
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 18-Oct-11 0.17 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 25-Oct-11 0.35 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 1-Nov-11 0.12 <1 <2 11 <1 0.22
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 8-Nov-11 0.3 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 15-Nov-11 0.48 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 22-Nov-11 0.62 <1 <2 6 <1 0.23
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 29-Nov-11 0.37 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 6-Dec-11 0.4 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 13-Dec-11 0.5 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 20-Dec-11 0.46 <1 <2 6 <1 0.24
MPR-
438
125 Ave. West off
256 St. 28-Dec-11 0.48 <1 NA 7 <1 0.32
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
68
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 4-Jan-11 0.55 <1 <2 4 <1 0.37
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 11-Jan-11 0.96 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 18-Jan-11 0.79 <1 <2 5 <1 0.42
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 25-Jan-11 0.42 <1 4 4 <1 0.37
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 1-Feb-11 0.27 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 8-Feb-11 0.54 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 15-Feb-11 0.62 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 22-Feb-11 0.29 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 1-Mar-11 0.71 <1 <2 3 <1 0.24
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 8-Mar-11 0.59 <1 <2 3 <1 0.22
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 15-Mar-11 0.41 <1 <2 4 <1 0.25
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 22-Mar-11 0.64 <1 <2 5 <1 0.43
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 29-Mar-11 0.71 <1 26 5 <1 0.27
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 5-Apr-11 0.31 <1 <2 4 <1 0.39
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 12-Apr-11 0.46 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 19-Apr-11 0.19 <1 2 6 <1 0.27
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 26-Apr-11 0.61 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 3-May-11 0.53 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 10-May-11 0.55 <1 <2 7 <1 0.23
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 17-May-11 0.47 <1 <2 7 <1 0.23
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 24-May-11 0.46 <1 48 7 <1 0.24
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 31-May-11 0.35 <1 2 10 <1 0.2
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
69
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 7-Jun-11 0.16 <1 <2 14 <1 0.27
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 14-Jun-11 0.35 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 21-Jun-11 0.39 <1 <2 13 <1 0.19
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 28-Jun-11 0.18 <1 4 14 <1 0.21
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 5-Jul-11 0.35 <1 <2 13 <1 0.2
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 12-Jul-11 0.05 <1 16 15 <1 0.28
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 19-Jul-11 0.21 <1 10 14 <1 0.21
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 26-Jul-11 0.11 <1 12 15 <1 0.29
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 3-Aug-11 0.06 <1 26 16 <1 0.23
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 9-Aug-11 0.07 <1 4 17 <1 0.23
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 16-Aug-11 <0.01 <1 32 17 <1 0.23
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 23-Aug-11 0.12 <1 <2 19 <1 0.25
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 30-Aug-11 0.05 <1 52 17 <1 0.28
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 6-Sep-11 0.58 <1 <2 16 <1 0.23
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 13-Sep-11 0.19 <1 <2 15 <1 0.26
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 20-Sep-11 0.61 <1 <2 17 <1 <0.06
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 27-Sep-11 0.57 <1 <2 15 <1 0.19
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 4-Oct-11 0.36 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 11-Oct-11 0.04 <1 4 12 <1 0.28
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 18-Oct-11 0.13 <1 46 11 <1 0.24
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 25-Oct-11 0.51 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 1-Nov-11 0.58 <1 <2 10 <1 0.2
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
70
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 8-Nov-11 0.58 <1 <2 9 <1 0.26
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 15-Nov-11 0.7 <1 2 9 <1 0.25
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 22-Nov-11 0.93 <1 2 6 <1 0.26
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 29-Nov-11 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 6-Dec-11 0.72 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 13-Dec-11 0.93 <1 <2 4 <1 0.23
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 20-Dec-11 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.25
MPR-
439
130 Ave. @ 251A
St. (W. of 256 St.) 28-Dec-11 1 <1 NA 6 <1 0.24
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 4-Jan-11 0.77 <1 <2 3 <1 0.34
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 4-Jan-11 0.77 <1 <2 3 <1 0.34
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 11-Jan-11 0.75 <1 <2 3 <1 0.45
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 18-Jan-11 0.79 <1 <2 5 <1 0.69
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 25-Jan-11 0.89 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 1-Feb-11 0.79 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 8-Feb-11 0.87 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 15-Feb-11 0.69 <1 <2 4 <1 0.38
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 22-Feb-11 0.81 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 1-Mar-11 1.3 <1 <2 3 <1 0.35
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 8-Mar-11 0.83 <1 <2 3 <1 0.3
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 15-Mar-11 0.78 <1 <2 3 <1 0.52
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 22-Mar-11 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 29-Mar-11 1.6 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
71
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 5-Apr-11 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.44
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 12-Apr-11 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.4
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 19-Apr-11 0.88 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 26-Apr-11 1.3 <1 <2 5 <1 0.23
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 3-May-11 0.97 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 10-May-11 0.73 <1 <2 9 <1 0.35
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 17-May-11 1.2 <1 2 5 <1 0.33
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 24-May-11 0.76 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 31-May-11 0.75 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 7-Jun-11 0.8 <1 <2 14 <1 0.42
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 14-Jun-11 0.92 <1 <2 8 <1 0.26
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 21-Jun-11 0.92 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 28-Jun-11 0.85 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 5-Jul-11 0.73 <1 <2 10 <1 0.33
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 12-Jul-11 0.76 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 19-Jul-11 0.92 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 26-Jul-11 0.95 <1 2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 3-Aug-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 9-Aug-11 0.92 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 16-Aug-11 0.87 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 23-Aug-11 0.7 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 30-Aug-11 0.78 <1 <2 10 <1 0.22
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
72
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 6-Sep-11 0.88 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 13-Sep-11 0.88 <1 2 10 <1 0.2
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 20-Sep-11 0.86 <1 4 11 <1 0.06
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 27-Sep-11 0.79 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 4-Oct-11 0.88 <1 <2 10 <1 0.26
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 11-Oct-11 0.65 <1 <2 11 <1 0.39
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 18-Oct-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 25-Oct-11 0.96 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 1-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 9 <1 0.27
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 8-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 15-Nov-11 1.2 <1 <2 8 <1 0.27
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 22-Nov-11 1.2 <1 4 5 <1 0.27
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 29-Nov-11 1.3 <1 <2 7 <1 0.65
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 6-Dec-11 1.1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 13-Dec-11 0.9 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 20-Dec-11 0.71 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
440
232 St. @ 117
Ave. 28-Dec-11 0.86 <1 NA 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 4-Jan-11 0.67 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 11-Jan-11 0.67 <1 <2 4 <1 0.49
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 18-Jan-11 0.92 <1 <2 5 <1 0.84
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 25-Jan-11 0.62 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 1-Feb-11 0.62 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
73
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 8-Feb-11 0.76 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 15-Feb-11 0.77 <1 2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 22-Feb-11 0.68 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 1-Mar-11 0.61 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 8-Mar-11 0.69 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 15-Mar-11 0.64 <1 <2 4 <1 0.45
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 22-Mar-11 0.71 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 29-Mar-11 0.67 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 5-Apr-11 0.76 <1 <2 5 <1 0.42
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 12-Apr-11 0.93 <1 <2 5 <1 0.38
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 19-Apr-11 0.91 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 26-Apr-11 0.82 <1 <2 5 <1 0.24
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 3-May-11 0.77 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 10-May-11 0.69 <1 <2 7 <1 0.36
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 17-May-11 0.67 <1 <2 6 <1 0.37
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 24-May-11 0.63 <1 2 7 <1 0.33
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 31-May-11 0.65 <1 <2 8 <1 0.29
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 7-Jun-11 0.74 <1 2 9 <1 0.39
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 14-Jun-11 0.75 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 21-Jun-11 0.72 <1 <2 9 <1 0.2
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 28-Jun-11 0.75 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 5-Jul-11 0.47 <1 <2 10 <1 0.32
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
74
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 12-Jul-11 0.69 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 19-Jul-11 0.86 <1 14 10 <1 0.21
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 26-Jul-11 0.76 <1 2 10 <1 0.31
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 3-Aug-11 0.81 <1 6 12 <1 0.31
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 9-Aug-11 0.77 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 16-Aug-11 0.81 <1 <2 10 <1 0.21
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 23-Aug-11 0.67 <1 2 12 <1 0.24
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 30-Aug-11 0.72 <1 2 11 <1 0.22
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 6-Sep-11 0.59 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 13-Sep-11 0.73 <1 <2 11 <1 0.18
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 20-Sep-11 0.79 <1 <2 12 <1 0.06
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 27-Sep-11 0.9 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 4-Oct-11 0.41 <1 4 11 <1 0.36
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 11-Oct-11 0.68 <1 <2 11 <1 0.34
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 18-Oct-11 1 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 25-Oct-11 0.83 <1 <2 11 <1 0.3
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 1-Nov-11 0.83 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 8-Nov-11 0.74 <1 <2 9 <1 0.32
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 15-Nov-11 1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.5
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 22-Nov-11 1.1 <1 2 5 <1 0.23
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 29-Nov-11 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.58
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 6-Dec-11 1 <1 <2 9 <1 0.35
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
75
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 13-Dec-11 0.86 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 20-Dec-11 0.86 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
441
132 Ave. @ Cedar
Way 28-Dec-11 0.74 <1 NA 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 4-Jan-11 0.2 <1 2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 11-Jan-11 0.55 <1 <2 4 <1 0.44
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 18-Jan-11 0.23 <1 <2 5 <1 0.7
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 25-Jan-11 0.36 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 1-Feb-11 0.35 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 8-Feb-11 0.41 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 15-Feb-11 0.35 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 22-Feb-11 0.37 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 1-Mar-11 0.41 <1 4 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 8-Mar-11 0.35 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 15-Mar-11 0.35 <1 4 4 <1 0.49
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 22-Mar-11 0.36 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 29-Mar-11 0.28 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 5-Apr-11 0.24 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 12-Apr-11 0.32 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 19-Apr-11 0.39 <1 <2 6 <1 0.34
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 26-Apr-11 0.34 <1 <2 7 <1 0.21
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 3-May-11 0.39 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 10-May-11 0.31 <1 <2 9 <1 0.25
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
76
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 17-May-11 0.24 <1 <2 9 <1 0.32
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 24-May-11 0.24 <1 <2 9 <1 0.33
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 31-May-11 0.26 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 7-Jun-11 0.32 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 14-Jun-11 0.33 <1 <2 11 <1 0.22
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 21-Jun-11 0.34 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 28-Jun-11 0.3 <1 2 12 <1 0.21
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 5-Jul-11 0.33 <1 <2 11 <1 0.35
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 12-Jul-11 0.29 <1 2 14 <1 0.24
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 19-Jul-11 0.35 <1 230 13 <1 0.2
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 26-Jul-11 0.34 <1 2 13 <1 0.3
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 3-Aug-11 0.38 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 9-Aug-11 0.32 <1 <2 13 <1 0.27
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 16-Aug-11 0.29 <1 <2 13 <1 0.28
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 23-Aug-11 0.22 <1 2 14 <1 0.26
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 30-Aug-11 0.36 <1 <2 14 <1 0.27
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 6-Sep-11 0.19 <1 10 14 <1 0.28
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 13-Sep-11 0.24 <1 4 14 <1 0.22
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 20-Sep-11 0.2 <1 2 15 <1 0.06
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 27-Sep-11 0.33 <1 10 14 <1 0.21
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 4-Oct-11 0.16 <1 4 14 <1 0.27
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 11-Oct-11 0.17 <1 28 12 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
77
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 18-Oct-11 0.33 <1 2 12 <1 0.22
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 25-Oct-11 0.23 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 1-Nov-11 0.35 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 8-Nov-11 0.34 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 15-Nov-11 0.29 <1 2 9 <1 2.1
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 22-Nov-11 0.46 <1 4 6 <1 0.2
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 29-Nov-11 0.61 <1 <2 7 <1 0.47
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 6-Dec-11 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 13-Dec-11 0.44 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 20-Dec-11 0.43 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27
MPR-
442
Princess St. @
Ditton St. 28-Dec-11 0.41 <1 NA 6 <1 0.26
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 4-Jan-11 0.46 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 11-Jan-11 0.47 <1 2 4 <1 0.45
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 18-Jan-11 0.53 <1 <2 5 <1 1.2
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 25-Jan-11 0.52 <1 <2 6 <1 0.25
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 1-Feb-11 0.57 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 8-Feb-11 0.63 <1 <2 5 <1 0.37
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 15-Feb-11 0.74 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 22-Feb-11 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 1-Mar-11 0.64 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 8-Mar-11 0.51 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 15-Mar-11 0.54 <1 <2 4 <1 0.43
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
78
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 22-Mar-11 0.48 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 29-Mar-11 0.4 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 5-Apr-11 0.43 <1 <2 5 <1 0.4
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 12-Apr-11 0.69 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 19-Apr-11 0.66 <1 <2 7 <1 0.26
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 26-Apr-11 0.4 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 3-May-11 0.65 <1 <2 5 <1 0.27
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 10-May-11 0.55 <1 <2 9 <1 0.36
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 17-May-11 0.6 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 24-May-11 0.45 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 31-May-11 0.44 <1 2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 7-Jun-11 0.59 <1 <2 10 <1 0.39
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 14-Jun-11 0.46 <1 <2 11 <1 0.21
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 21-Jun-11 0.55 <1 2 9 <1 0.25
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 28-Jun-11 0.55 <1 6 11 <1 0.21
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 5-Jul-11 0.54 <1 2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 12-Jul-11 0.57 <1 6 12 <1 0.21
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 19-Jul-11 0.57 <1 2 12 <1 0.19
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 26-Jul-11 0.52 <1 4 12 <1 0.79
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 3-Aug-11 0.71 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 9-Aug-11 0.51 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 16-Aug-11 0.71 <1 2 11 <1 0.25
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
79
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 23-Aug-11 0.49 <1 <2 14 <1 0.22
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 30-Aug-11 0.62 <1 4 12 <1 0.23
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 6-Sep-11 0.54 <1 6 12 <1 0.26
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 13-Sep-11 0.65 <1 8 11 <1 0.23
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 20-Sep-11 0.97 <1 <2 14 <1 0.21
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 27-Sep-11 0.78 <1 10 13 <1 0.22
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 4-Oct-11 0.49 <1 24 11 <1 0.29
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 11-Oct-11 0.39 <1 12 12 <1 0.35
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 18-Oct-11 0.62 <1 12 11 <1 0.33
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 25-Oct-11 0.79 <1 <2 9 <1 1.2
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 1-Nov-11 0.52 <1 <2 8 <1 0.25
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 8-Nov-11 0.42 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 15-Nov-11 0.5 <1 2 9 <1 0.72
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 22-Nov-11 0.67 <1 <2 6 <1 0.23
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 29-Nov-11 0.81 <1 2 5 <1 0.47
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 6-Dec-11 1.1 <1 <2 4 <1 0.32
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 13-Dec-11 0.81 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 20-Dec-11 0.73 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
443
216 St. @
Donovan 28-Dec-11 0.64 <1 NA 7 <1 0.27
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 4-Jan-11 0.36 <1 <2 3 <1 0.39
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 11-Jan-11 0.32 <1 2 3 <1 0.45
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 18-Jan-11 0.49 <1 <2 4 <1 0.63
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
80
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 25-Jan-11 0.44 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 1-Feb-11 0.43 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 8-Feb-11 0.36 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 15-Feb-11 0.4 <1 <2 4 <1 0.23
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 22-Feb-11 0.56 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 1-Mar-11 0.48 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 8-Mar-11 0.45 <1 <2 3 <1 0.32
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 15-Mar-11 0.44 <1 <2 3 <1 0.48
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 22-Mar-11 0.17 <1 <2 4 <1 0.39
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 29-Mar-11 0.53 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 5-Apr-11 0.52 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 12-Apr-11 0.53 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 19-Apr-11 0.35 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 26-Apr-11 0.63 <1 <2 4 <1 0.24
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 3-May-11 0.58 <1 <2 4 <1 0.21
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 10-May-11 0.36 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 17-May-11 0.76 <1 <2 5 <1 0.38
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 24-May-11 0.32 <1 <2 9 <1 0.43
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 31-May-11 0.35 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 7-Jun-11 0.33 <1 2 10 <1 0.31
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 14-Jun-11 0.25 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 21-Jun-11 0.38 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
81
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 28-Jun-11 0.31 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 5-Jul-11 0.38 <1 4 10 <1 0.4
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 12-Jul-11 0.38 <1 <2 11 <1 0.23
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 19-Jul-11 0.36 <1 2 12 <1 0.2
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 26-Jul-11 0.32 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 3-Aug-11 0.38 <1 <2 13 <1 0.24
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 9-Aug-11 0.44 <1 4 12 <1 0.27
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 16-Aug-11 0.54 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 23-Aug-11 0.2 <1 <2 12 <1 0.84
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 30-Aug-11 0.36 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 6-Sep-11 0.49 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 13-Sep-11 0.42 <1 2 12 <1 0.23
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 20-Sep-11 0.32 <1 2 14 <1 <0.06
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 27-Sep-11 0.39 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 4-Oct-11 0.28 <1 <2 12 <1 0.31
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 11-Oct-11 0.23 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 18-Oct-11 0.14 <1 2 9 <1 0.26
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 25-Oct-11 0.34 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 1-Nov-11 0.4 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 8-Nov-11 0.44 <1 <2 8 <1 0.29
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 15-Nov-11 0.35 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 22-Nov-11 0.49 <1 <2 5 <1 0.2
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
82
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 29-Nov-11 0.44 <1 20 5 <1 0.35
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 6-Dec-11 0.71 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 13-Dec-11 0.55 <1 <2 6 <1 0.39
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 20-Dec-11 0.44 <1 <2 5 <1 0.22
MPR-
444
Foreman Drive @
232nd St. 28-Dec-11 0.51 <1 NA 6 <1 0.27
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 4-Jan-11 0.3 <1 8 4 <1 0.26
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 11-Jan-11 0.36 <1 2 4 <1 0.29
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 18-Jan-11 0.43 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 25-Jan-11 0.34 <1 <2 4 <1 0.39
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 1-Feb-11 0.17 <1 28 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 8-Feb-11 0.41 <1 150 4 <1 0.3
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 15-Feb-11 0.15 <1 66 4 <1 0.26
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 22-Feb-11 0.23 <1 50 4 <1 0.25
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 1-Mar-11 0.49 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 8-Mar-11 0.52 <1 <2 3 <1 0.22
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 15-Mar-11 0.4 <1 26 3 <1 0.25
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 22-Mar-11 0.46 <1 <2 4 <1 0.38
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 29-Mar-11 0.35 <1 40 4 <1 0.27
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 5-Apr-11 0.43 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 12-Apr-11 0.39 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 19-Apr-11 0.12 <1 2 6 <1 0.25
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 26-Apr-11 0.24 <1 10 4 <1 0.24
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
83
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 3-May-11 0.42 <1 110 4 <1 0.26
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 10-May-11 0.16 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 17-May-11 0.09 <1 50 7 <1 0.24
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 24-May-11 0.12 <1 50 9 <1 0.24
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 31-May-11 0.04 <1 110 10 <1 0.21
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 7-Jun-11 0.37 <1 <2 10 <1 0.2
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 14-Jun-11 0.05 <1 98 12 <1 0.19
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 21-Jun-11 0.08 <1 220 11 <1 0.19
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 28-Jun-11 0.31 <1 10 14 <1 0.24
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 5-Jul-11 0.33 <1 74 13 <1 0.26
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 12-Jul-11 0.08 <1 170 15 <1 0.21
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 19-Jul-11 0.29 <1 6 14 <1 0.24
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 26-Jul-11 0.3 <1 84 14 <1 0.26
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 3-Aug-11 0.35 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 9-Aug-11 0.15 <1 58 14 <1 0.25
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 16-Aug-11 0.46 <1 2 15 <1 0.22
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 23-Aug-11 0.23 <1 <2 15 <1 0.3
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 30-Aug-11 0.5 <1 2 15 <1 0.2
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 6-Sep-11 0.64 <1 <2 14 <1 0.19
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 13-Sep-11 0.21 <1 6 14 <1 0.2
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 20-Sep-11 0.2 <1 2 15 <1 0.24
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 27-Sep-11 0.48 <1 6 14 <1 0.17
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
84
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 4-Oct-11 0.14 <1 44 12 <1 0.25
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 11-Oct-11 0.13 <1 42 13 <1 0.27
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 18-Oct-11 0.27 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 25-Oct-11 0.35 <1 6 9 <1 0.26
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 1-Nov-11 0.34 <1 4 10 <1 0.21
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 8-Nov-11 0.39 <1 8 10 <1 0.21
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 15-Nov-11 0.36 <1 <2 9 <1 0.23
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 22-Nov-11 0.58 <1 4 5 <1 0.23
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 29-Nov-11 0.74 <1 <2 7 <1 0.25
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 6-Dec-11 0.49 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 13-Dec-11 0.8 <1 <2 6 <1 0.24
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 20-Dec-11 0.43 <1 38 7 <1 0.2
MPR-
445
127th Ave. and
266 St. 28-Dec-11 0.54 <1 NA 7 <1 0.19
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 4-Jan-11 0.92 <1 2 3 <1 0.38
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 11-Jan-11 0.99 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 18-Jan-11 0.88 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 25-Jan-11 0.53 <1 2 4 <1 0.45
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 1-Feb-11 0.93 <1 <2 4 <1 0.38
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 8-Feb-11 1.1 <1 <2 4 <1 0.28
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 15-Feb-11 0.58 <1 <2 4 <1 0.29
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 22-Feb-11 1.2 <1 2 4 <1 0.33
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 1-Mar-11 0.8 <1 <2 3 <1 0.32
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
85
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 8-Mar-11 0.86 <1 <2 3 <1 0.3
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 15-Mar-11 0.49 <1 <2 3 <1 0.28
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 22-Mar-11 0.64 <1
[Contam
ination.]
LA 4 <1 0.47
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 29-Mar-11 0.53 <1 <2 4 <1 0.43
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 5-Apr-11 0.45 <1 <2 4 <1 0.33
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 12-Apr-11 0.38 <1 <2 4 <1 0.34
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 19-Apr-11 0.44 <1 <2 5 <1 0.36
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 26-Apr-11 0.26 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 3-May-11 0.88 <1 <2 4 <1 0.27
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 10-May-11 0.41 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 17-May-11 0.3 <1 <2 7 <1 0.41
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 24-May-11 0.74 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 31-May-11 0.8 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 7-Jun-11 0.64 <1 <2 10 <1 0.38
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 14-Jun-11 0.77 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 21-Jun-11 0.61 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 28-Jun-11 0.52 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 5-Jul-11 0.45 <1 <2 11 <1 0.32
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 12-Jul-11 0.45 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 19-Jul-11 0.41 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 26-Jul-11 0.47 <1 4 13 <1 0.25
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
86
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 3-Aug-11 0.5 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 9-Aug-11 0.68 <1 4 13 <1 0.37
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 16-Aug-11 0.73 <1 2 13 <1 0.46
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 23-Aug-11 0.47 <1 <2 14 <1 0.32
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 30-Aug-11 0.44 <1 <2 14 <1 0.31
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 6-Sep-11 0.5 <1 <2 13 <1 0.39
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 13-Sep-11 0.42 <1 <2 12 <1 0.21
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 20-Sep-11 0.58 <1 <2 15 <1 0.06
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 27-Sep-11 0.68 <1 <2 12 <1 0.32
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 4-Oct-11 0.93 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 11-Oct-11 0.6 <1 <2 11 <1 0.37
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 18-Oct-11 0.78 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 25-Oct-11 0.73 <1 <2 9 <1 0.31
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 1-Nov-11 0.86 <1 <2 9 <1 0.3
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 8-Nov-11 0.92 <1 <2 8 <1 0.25
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 15-Nov-11 0.96 <1 <2 8 <1 0.24
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 22-Nov-11 0.99 <1 2 5 <1 0.49
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 30-Nov-11 1.2 <1 <2 6 <1 0.24
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 6-Dec-11 0.81 <1 <2 5 <1 0.32
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 13-Dec-11 0.8 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 20-Dec-11 0.75 <1 <2 7 <1 0.25
MPR-
446
128th Ave and
Willow Place 28-Dec-11 0.81 <1 NA 6 <1 0.26
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
87
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 4-Jan-11 0.31 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 11-Jan-11 0.35 <1 4 5 <1 0.46
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 18-Jan-11 0.31 <1 <2 6 <1 0.68
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 25-Jan-11 0.25 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 1-Feb-11 0.32 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 8-Feb-11 0.43 <1 <2 5 <1 0.31
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 15-Feb-11 0.37 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 22-Feb-11 0.43 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 1-Mar-11 0.25 <1 <2 4 <1 0.25
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 8-Mar-11 0.32 <1 <2 4 <1 0.25
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 15-Mar-11 0.46 <1 <2 5 <1 0.43
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 22-Mar-11 0.47 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 29-Mar-11 0.27 <1 2 4 <1 0.3
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 5-Apr-11 0.24 <1 <2 6 <1 0.34
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 12-Apr-11 0.35 <1 2 5 <1 0.35
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 19-Apr-11 0.41 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 26-Apr-11 0.41 <1 <2 6 <1 0.22
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 3-May-11 0.38 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 10-May-11 0.23 <1 <2 9 <1 0.36
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 17-May-11 0.19 <1 <2 8 <1 0.29
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 24-May-11 0.37 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 31-May-11 0.33 <1 2 12 <1 0.31
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
88
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 7-Jun-11 0.28 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 14-Jun-11 0.37 <1 8 11 <1 0.2
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 21-Jun-11 0.37 <1 4 11 <1 0.25
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 28-Jun-11 0.33 <1 6 14 <1 0.24
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 5-Jul-11 0.25 <1 12 11 <1 0.29
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 12-Jul-11 0.3 <1 6 12 <1 0.2
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 19-Jul-11 0.35 <1 4 12 <1 0.2
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 26-Jul-11 0.31 <1 12 12 <1 0.27
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 3-Aug-11 0.47 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 9-Aug-11 0.34 <1 2 13 <1 0.24
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 16-Aug-11 0.31 <1 16 12 <1 0.25
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 23-Aug-11 0.31 <1 <2 15 <1 0.28
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 30-Aug-11 0.28 <1 14 14 <1 0.27
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 6-Sep-11 0.42 <1 12 13 <1 0.49
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 13-Sep-11 0.4 <1 24 13 <1 0.22
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 20-Sep-11 0.33 <1 <2 14 <1 0.08
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 27-Sep-11 0.37 <1 10 14 <1 0.2
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 4-Oct-11 0.17 <1 30 13 <1 0.29
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 11-Oct-11 0.15 <1 34 12 <1 0.3
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 18-Oct-11 0.34 <1 20 11 <1 0.27
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 25-Oct-11 0.16 <1 18 10 <1 0.32
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 1-Nov-11 0.2 <1 16 10 <1 0.23
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
89
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 8-Nov-11 0.23 <1 6 9 <1 0.27
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 15-Nov-11 0.28 <1 <2 9 <1 1
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 22-Nov-11 0.38 <1 <2 6 <1 0.22
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 29-Nov-11 0.58 <1 <2 7 <1 0.47
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 6-Dec-11 0.6 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 13-Dec-11 0.6 <1 2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 20-Dec-11 0.58 <1 <2 6 <1 0.26
MPR-
447
117 Ave. @ 210
St. 28-Dec-11 0.6 <1 NA 6 <1 0.26
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 4-Jan-11 0.51 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 11-Jan-11 0.88 <1 <2 5 <1 0.5
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 18-Jan-11 0.59 <1 <2 4 <1 0.36
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 25-Jan-11 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.41
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 1-Feb-11 0.9 <1 <2 4 <1 0.31
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 8-Feb-11 0.6 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 15-Feb-11 0.59 <1 <2 4 <1 0.26
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 22-Feb-11 0.52 <1 <2 4 <1 0.3
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 1-Mar-11 0.49 <1 <2 3 <1 0.44
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 8-Mar-11 0.57 <1 <2 4 <1 0.24
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 15-Mar-11 0.6 <1 2 5 <1 0.35
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 22-Mar-11 0.34 <1 <2 6 <1 0.36
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 23-Mar-11 0.38 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 29-Mar-11 0.43 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
90
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 5-Apr-11 0.32 <1 <2 4 <1 0.35
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 12-Apr-11 0.32 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 19-Apr-11 1.1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.28
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 26-Apr-11 0.67 <1 <2 7 <1 0.25
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 3-May-11 0.45 <1 2 6 <1 0.33
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 10-May-11 0.72 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 17-May-11 0.92 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 24-May-11 0.76 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 31-May-11 0.89 <1 <2 10 <1 0.23
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 7-Jun-11 0.64 <1 <2 12 <1 0.41
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 14-Jun-11 0.74 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 21-Jun-11 0.67 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 28-Jun-11 0.56 <1 <2 15 <1 0.26
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 5-Jul-11 0.65 <1 <2 14 <1 0.22
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 12-Jul-11 0.68 <1 <2 15 <1 0.25
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 19-Jul-11 0.3 <1 <2 15 <1 0.21
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 26-Jul-11 0.43 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 3-Aug-11 0.6 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 9-Aug-11 0.49 <1 <2 14 <1 0.26
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 16-Aug-11 0.53 <1 8 14 <1 0.51
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 23-Aug-11 0.75 <1 <2 15 <1 0.26
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 30-Aug-11 0.41 <1 <2 14 <1 0.26
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
91
Sample
name
Sample reported
name
Sampled
date
Chlorine
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100mL
Turbidity
NTU
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 6-Sep-11 0.57 <1 <2 14 <1 0.39
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 13-Sep-11 0.45 <1 2 14 <1 0.24
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 20-Sep-11 0.45 <1 2 17 <1 0.07
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 4-Oct-11 0.53 <1 8 14 <1 0.32
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 11-Oct-11 0.73 <1 6 13 <1 0.31
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 18-Oct-11 0.39 <1 4 12 <1 0.25
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 25-Oct-11 0.32 <1 6 11 <1 0.26
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 1-Nov-11 0.33 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 8-Nov-11 0.28 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 15-Nov-11 0.26 <1 2 9 <1 0.28
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 22-Nov-11 0.57 <1 2 8 <1 0.35
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 29-Nov-11 0.88 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27
MPR-
448
248th St.
&McClure 6-Dec-11 0.55 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-
448
248th St. &
McClure 13-Dec-11 0.4 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28
MPR-
448
248th St. &
McClure 20-Dec-11 0.49 <1 <2 6 <1 0.23
MPR-
448
248th St. &
McClure 28-Dec-11 0.47 <1 NA 6 <1 0.24
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
92
APPENDIX I: 2012 CAPITAL PROJECT LOCATIONS
Maple Ridge West Transmission Main (by Metro Vancouver)
Telep Avenue, 201B Street to 203 Street
203 Street from Telep Avenue to Powell Avenue
Abernethy Way from 224 Street to 232 Street
Barnston-Maple Ridge Pump Station and associated water mains near Lougheed and
200 Street (by Metro Vancouver)
124 Avenue, from 246 Street to 248 Street
Dewdney Trunk Road from Laity Street to 216 Street
River Road at 236 Street
Seismic Upgrade Program – various locations
Water Security Improvements – various locations
Water Main Replacement Program – various locations
Additional information on construction projects is available at www.mapleridge.ca
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
93
APPENDIX J: DRINKING WATER AND THOSE WITH WEAKENED IMMUNE SYSTEMS
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
94
District of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2011
95
1151
District of Maple Ridge
MEMORANDUM
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: June 4, 2012
and Members of Council FILE NO: CDPR-0640-30
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C.O.W.
SUBJECT: FEES & CHARGES AMENDMENT – BYLAW #6932-2012
ANNUAL ADMISSIONS & FACILITY RENTAL RATE REVIEW
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The attached report, reviewed by the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks & Leisure Services
Commission at their meeting of May 3, 2012, is provided for background.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees Amending Bylaw No. 6932-2012 be given first, second and
third readings.
“Original signed by Liz Holitzki”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Kelly Swift, General Manager, Community Development
Parks & Recreation Services
________________________________________________
Approved by: J.L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
:ik
Attachment – Schedules “A”, “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, “F”, “G”, “H”, “J”, “K”, “L” and “M”
\\mr.corp\docs\CDPR-Admin\01-Admin\0540-Council-Committees\20-PLSC\02-Agendas\Regular\2012\2012-05-
03\Fees_and_Charges_2013_Report.docx 1
SUBJECT: SUBJECT: SUBJECT: SUBJECT: ANNUAL ADMISSIONS & FACILITY RENTAL RATE REVIEWANNUAL ADMISSIONS & FACILITY RENTAL RATE REVIEWANNUAL ADMISSIONS & FACILITY RENTAL RATE REVIEWANNUAL ADMISSIONS & FACILITY RENTAL RATE REVIEW
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE SUMMARY::::
Staff has conducted the annual review of fees and charges to determine how Maple Ridge and Pitt
Meadows Parks and Leisure Service fees compare to neighbouring municipalities. The research
shows that in some areas we have fallen behind and staff is recommending an increase in all areas
except those that are above the average.
RECOMMENDATION:RECOMMENDATION:RECOMMENDATION:RECOMMENDATION:
That a Fees and Charges Bylaw update be forwarded to both Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows That a Fees and Charges Bylaw update be forwarded to both Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows That a Fees and Charges Bylaw update be forwarded to both Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows That a Fees and Charges Bylaw update be forwarded to both Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows
Councils bCouncils bCouncils bCouncils based on the proposed increaseased on the proposed increaseased on the proposed increaseased on the proposed increasessss and including the introduction of aand including the introduction of aand including the introduction of aand including the introduction of a new new new new fee for the fee for the fee for the fee for the
commercial use of tennis/sports courts and outdoor fitness equipmentcommercial use of tennis/sports courts and outdoor fitness equipmentcommercial use of tennis/sports courts and outdoor fitness equipmentcommercial use of tennis/sports courts and outdoor fitness equipment, , , , to be to be to be to be implemented January implemented January implemented January implemented January
1, 2013.1, 2013.1, 2013.1, 2013.
DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:
a)a)a)a) Background Context:Background Context:Background Context:Background Context:
Once a year, in February or March, staff reviews the rental and admission rates of a number of
Lower Mainland recreation facilities including but not limited to: Abbotsford, Mission, Langley,
Surrey, Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, Burnaby and North Vancouver. The data gathered is used to
determine current market rental and admission rates to ensure we are in line with our
neighbours.
Included in this report is a document showing the average rate of comparable facilities, Parks &
Leisure Services current rates, and the proposed 2013 rates (Appendix 1).
Staff have determined that drop-in admission rates for the Leisure Centre and Family Recreation
Centre are below the current average and staff are recommending an increase of approximately
5% for individual admissions which will keep rates below the market average.
Although Parks & Leisure Services conducts an annual review of fees and charges that result in
regular rate increases, current rental rates for most categories are below market value. This may
be due to greater than average increase to fees set in other communities that we compare to. In
this area, staff are recommending increasing rates by 7-10% which would bring them closer to
current market rates.
The demand for use of courts for small businesses such as tennis instruction and boot camps
has increased and staff are recommending the introduction of a rental fee of $15.00/hour per
court for the commercial use of tennis/sport/fitness courts so that private businesses that use
public facilities are also contributing to operating costs. This rate was determined by taking an
average of a number of municipalities that currently charge a commercial fee for use of courts.
The booking of these facilities will follow the Parks & Leisure Services booking allocation policy,
approved by Commission in April 2011 which gives priority use to:
Maple Ridge and Pitt MeadowsMaple Ridge and Pitt MeadowsMaple Ridge and Pitt MeadowsMaple Ridge and Pitt Meadows
Parks & Leisure ServicesParks & Leisure ServicesParks & Leisure ServicesParks & Leisure Services Commission ReportCommission ReportCommission ReportCommission Report
REGULAR MEETINGREGULAR MEETINGREGULAR MEETINGREGULAR MEETING
May 3, 2012May 3, 2012May 3, 2012May 3, 2012
\\mr.corp\docs\CDPR-Admin\01-Admin\0540-Council-Committees\20-PLSC\02-Agendas\Regular\2012\2012-05-
03\Fees_and_Charges_2013_Report.docx 2
• Parks & Leisure Services programs, events and services
• School District No. 42
• Non-profit community groups
• Local, private or political groups
• Local, commercial groups
• Non-resident groups
In addition to regular fee reviews Commission also maintains a commitment to providing barrier
free access to our residents. This is evident in our low cost recreation program options,
recreation access program and our work with community programs such as KidSport, Canadian
Tire Jumpstart and School District No. 42’s Tzu Chi bursaries. These programs provide Maple
Ridge and Pitt Meadows residents, living below the low income threshold, with access to
recreation facilities and programs free or at a reduced rate. Commission also waives rental
fees equivalent to registration fees by minor sport organizations for children and youth who need
financial assistance to participate. In addition, Commission recently endorsed the Grade 5 Active
Pass initiative that will enable all Maple Ridge students in Grade 5 unlimited access to drop-in
programs at the Leisure Centre, Family Recreation Centre and Greg Moore Youth Centre. These
programs will continue in 2013 with the full support of Parks & Leisure Services staff.
a) a) a) a) Desired Outcome:Desired Outcome:Desired Outcome:Desired Outcome:
That fees assist in offsetting facility operating costs, while balancing the need to ensure Parks &
Leisure Services remain accessible to all residents.
b)b)b)b) Strategic Alignment:Strategic Alignment:Strategic Alignment:Strategic Alignment: Financial ManagementFinancial ManagementFinancial ManagementFinancial Management
Provide citizens with quality services in a cost effective and efficient manner.
c)c)c)c) Citizen/Customer Implications:Citizen/Customer Implications:Citizen/Customer Implications:Citizen/Customer Implications:
Customers who visit the Leisure Centre will see an increase to drop-in admission rates of 5%
equating to an average of .19 cents per visit for an individual and .47 cents for a family.
Customers who visit the Family Recreation Centre will see an increase to drop-in admission rates
of 5% equating to an average of .17 cents per visit for an individual and .33 cents for a family.
User groups have been notified that the Fees and Charges Bylaw is under annual review and are
cognizant that an increase will be introduced in January 2013. Staff will inform user groups of
increase rates as soon as Commission and both Councils approve them so they may work this
into 2013 budgets and registration fees.
d)d)d)d) Business Plan/Financial Implications:Business Plan/Financial Implications:Business Plan/Financial Implications:Business Plan/Financial Implications:
Commission’s practice is to review Parks & Leisure Services fees and charges annually and to
plan regular, modest increases that reflect average market rates for comparable services to
avoid significant impact to user groups.
e)e)e)e) Alternatives:Alternatives:Alternatives:Alternatives:
To stay with the minimum CPI (2.3%) increase across the board.
\\mr.corp\docs\CDPR-Admin\01-Admin\0540-Council-Committees\20-PLSC\02-Agendas\Regular\2012\2012-05-
03\Fees_and_Charges_2013_Report.docx 3
CONCLUSION:CONCLUSION:CONCLUSION:CONCLUSION:
Serving Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows with well used and well maintained facilities by conducting
an annual review of fees and charges, allows Parks & Leisure Services to keep services accessible to
residents while contributing to service and facility operating costs.
Prepared By: Danielle Pope
Manager, Business Operations
Approved By: Wendy McCormick
Director Recreation
Approved By: Kelly Swift
General Manager, Community Development
Parks & Recreation Services
:dp
Attachment
* all fees may be adjusted lightly due to rounding formulas
CPI INCREASES (2.3%)
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non-Profit 98.18 102.05 100.99$Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 125.59 243.44 128.71$Below market average
Youth Non-Profit 38.31 39.06 39.74$Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 59.07 76.47 60.66$Below market average
5% INCREASES
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Child 2.76 3.16 2.90$Below market average
Student 3.53 4.15 3.71$Below market average
Adult 5.43 5.74 5.70$Below market average
Senior 3.53 4.29 3.71$Below market average
Family 9.47 11.73 9.94$Below market average
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Child 2.36 3.00 2.48$Below market average
Student 3.05 3.69 3.20$Below market average
Adult 4.78 5.31 5.02$Below market average
Senior 3.05 3.99 3.20$Below market average
CURRENT FEES, PROPOSED FEES & AVERAGE FEES ANALYSIS
MRLC Admissions
Ice Rentals
PMFRC Admissions
Dry Floor Rentals
Senior 3.05 3.99 3.20$Below market average
Family 8.93 n/a 9.38$Below market average
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Child 1.52 2.14 1.60$Below market average
Student 2.26 2.68 2.37$Below market average
Adult 2.89 3.71 3.03$Below market average
Senior 2.26 2.84 2.37$Below market average
Family 5.78 8.21 6.07$Below market average
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Child 2.48 2.70 2.60$Below market average
Student 3.03 3.54 3.18$Below market average
Adult 4.29 5 4.50$Below market average
Senior 3.03 4 3.18$Below market average
Family 7.21 10.7 7.57$Below market average
Parent & Tot 3.58 5.35 3.76$Below market average
Outdoor Pools
Skating Admissions
7% INCREASES
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non-Profit 45.62 49.68 50.48$Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 67.19 70.83 72.59$Below market average
Private Groups 77.19 114.37 82.59$Below market average
Commercial 84.91 147.33 90.85$Below market average
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non-Profit 107.76 219.65 116.69$Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 122.63 219.65 131.56$Below market average
Private Groups 159.56 219.65 170.70$Below market average
Commercial 172.3 219.65 184.36$Below market average
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non-Profit 24.04 30.90 27.39$Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 43.21 36.52 46.93$Below market average
Private Groups 53.21 73.22 56.93$Below market average
Commercial 58.53 87.90 62.62$Below market average
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
No
comparable
facilities
Greg Moore Youth Centre - Active Area
Medium Hall (Hammond 100-120)
Specialized Hall (up to 200) (special event rate)
Gymnasium - Full Sized
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non-Profit 38.31 42.66$Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 59.07 63.90$Below market average
Private Groups 69.07 73.90$Below market average
Commercial 75.98 81.29$Below market average
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non-Profit 0.00 -$Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 13.03 14.64$Below market average
Private Groups 23.03 24.64$Below market average
Commercial 25.33 27.10$Below market average
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non-Profit 0.00 -$Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 6.46 6.91$Below market average
Private Groups 16.46 17.61$Below market average
Commercial 18.11 19.37$Below market average
No
comparable
facilities
No
comparable
facilities
No
comparable
facilities
Greg Moore Youth Centre - Multi-Purpose
Greg Moore Youth Centre - Lounge
Greg Moore Youth Centre - Active Area
10% INCREASES
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non-Profit 27.70 37.03 32.86$Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 47.28 56.16 53.01$Below market average
Private Groups 57.28 90.47 63.01$Below market average
Commercial 63.01 110.06 69.31$Below market average
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non Profit (reg)/Swim Club 31.86 64.70 35.04$
Adult Non Profit (reg)69.24 88.41 76.14$
Private (reg)77.16 138.53 84.90$
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non Profit (reg)/Swim Club 5.31 10.79 5.84$
Adult Non Profit (reg)11.54 14.74 12.69$
Private (reg)12.86 20.11 14.15$
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Large Meeting Room (Fraser 80-100)
Per Lane
As recommended in 2011 report, 10%
increase per year until market average is
attained.
As recommended in 2011 report, 10%
increase per year until market average is
attained.
Indoor Pool
Large Hall (Heritage 200-300)
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non-Profit 0.00 20.71 -$Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 8.82 27.29 12.77$Below market average
Private Groups 18.82 48.01 22.77$Below market average
Commercial 20.70 62.19 25.05$Below market average
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non-Profit 0.00 10.87 -$Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 0.00 16.35 -$Below market average
Private Groups 10.86 21.56 11.95$Below market average
Commercial 11.95 24.77 13.15$Below market average
Category PLS Current Average PLS Propose Reason
Youth Non-Profit 0.00 9.02 -$Below market average
Adult Non-Profit 0.00 13.38 -$Below market average
Private Groups 13.09 21.56 14.40$Below market average
Commercial 14.40 24.27 15.84$Below market average
Small Meeting Room (Alouette 20)
Medium Meeting Room (Art Workshop 60)
Large Meeting Room (Fraser 80-100)
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 6932-2012
A Bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988 as amended.
__________________________________________________________
WHEREAS the Council may by bylaw establish and regulate the fixing of fees for admissions and/or
use of sports, recreation and community use facilities;
AND WHEREAS, the Council has imposed fees and now wishes to amend those fees;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees Amending Bylaw No. 6932-
2012.
2. That Maple Ridge Recreation Facility Fees By-law No. 4117 - 1988 as amended, be further
amended by deleting Schedules “A”, “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, “F”, “G”, “H”, “J”, “K”, “L” and “M” in
their entirety and replacing with Schedule “A”, “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, “F”, “G” “H”, “J”, “K”, “L”
and “M” as attached hereto.
3. This Bylaw shall come into force and effect as of January 1, 2013 for Schedules “A”, “B”, “C”,
“D”, “E”, “F”, “G”, “H”, “J”, “K”, “L” and “M”.
READ a first time the
READ a second time the
READ a third time the
ADOPTED this
________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER
________________________
CORPORATE OFFICER
Attachments: Schedules “A”, “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, “F”, “H”, “J”, “K”, “L” and “M”.
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “A”
Arenas
Effective January 1, 2013
taxes extra Ice Ice Ice Dry Floor Planet Ice
Prime Non-Prime Early Bird Mtg Room
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial
Use $138.71 $110.97
$70.66 $14.40
Fundraising $125.46 $97.72
$57.41 $7.20
Special Event $118.84 $91.10 $91.10 $50.79 $3.60
Regular Use $100.99 $76.02 $76.02 $39.74 $0.00
Adult Non
Profit
Commercial
Use $138.71 $110.97
$70.66 $14.40
Fundraising $138.71 $110.97
$70.66 $14.40
Special Event $133.71 $105.97 $105.97 $65.66 $7.20
Regular Use $128.71 $100.97 $100.97 $60.66 $0.00
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising $193.16 $156.13
$105.99 $21.60
Special Event $185.84 $148.85
$88.32 $18.00
Regular Use $197.88 $143.72
$70.66 $14.40
Local Commercial
Fundraising $305.27 $235.64
$113.05 $23.04
Special Event $254.24 $203.88
$95.39 $19.44
Regular Use $209.87 $161.99
$77.72 $15.84
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising $307.07 $245.66
$120.12 $24.48
Special Event $263.21 $210.56
$102.45 $20.88
Regular Use $215.88 $172.70
$84.79 $17.28
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “B”
Fairgrounds
Effective January 1, 2013
taxes extra Commercial or Beef Stage Grounds &
Exhibition Barn Showrings
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial
Use $20.40 $30.58 $5.09 $17.85
Fundraising $10.20 $17.33 $2.55 $8.93
Special Event $5.10 $10.71 $1.27 $4.46
Regular Use $0.00 $3.67 $0.00 $0.00
Adult Non
Profit
Commercial
Use $20.40 $30.58 $5.09 $17.85
Fundraising $20.40 $30.58 $5.09 $17.85
Special Event $15.40 $25.58 $2.55 $12.85
Regular Use $10.40 $20.58 $0.00 $7.85
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising $30.60 $45.87 $7.64 $26.78
Special Event $25.50 $38.22 $6.37 $22.31
Regular Use $20.40 $30.58 $5.09 $17.85
Local Commercial
Fundraising $32.64 $48.92 $8.15 $28.56
Special Event $27.54 $41.28 $6.88 $24.10
Regular Use $22.44 $33.64 $5.60 $19.64
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising $34.68 $51.98 $8.66 $30.35
Special Event $29.58 $44.34 $7.39 $25.88
Regular Use $24.48 $36.69 $6.11 $21.42
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “C”
Maple Ridge Leisure Centre Pool Rates
Effective January 1, 2013
taxes extra Leisure Pool/Competition Pool Hammond Pool
Per Lane Full Pool
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial Use $14.15 $61.02
Fundraising $10.32 $42.23
Special Event $8.38 $32.79
Regular Use $5.84 $21.08
Adult Non Profit
Commercial Use $14.15 $61.02
Fundraising $14.15 $61.02
Special Event $13.86 $53.91
Regular Use $12.69 $46.83
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising $21.19 $91.51
Special Event $17.67 $76.26
Regular Use $14.15 $61.02
Local Commercial
Fundraising $22.63 $97.64
Special Event $19.10 $82.38
Regular Use $15.52 $67.12
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising $24.02 $103.73
Special Event $20.49 $88.47
Regular Use $16.96 $73.22
Lifeguard Fees are extra.
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “D”
Maple Ridge Leisure Centre
Effective January 1, 2013
taxes extra Full Gym Half Gym 1/4 Gym (Multi-P) Preschool
Cap. 1000 Cap. 500 Cap. 80 Cap. 40
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial Use $82.59 $41.30 $20.65 $11.01
Fundraising $69.34 $34.67 $17.34 $5.51
Special Event $62.72 $31.36 $15.68 $2.75
Regular Use $50.48 $25.24 $12.62 $0.00
Adult Non Profit
Commercial Use $82.59 $41.30 $20.65 $11.01
Fundraising $82.59 $41.30 $20.65 $11.01
Special Event $77.59 $38.80 $19.40 $5.51
Regular Use $72.59 $36.30 $18.15 $0.00
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising $123.89 $61.94 $30.97 $16.52
Special Event $103.24 $51.62 $25.81 $13.76
Regular Use $82.59 $41.30 $20.65 $11.01
Local Commercial
Fundraising $132.15 $66.07 $33.04 $17.62
Special Event $111.50 $55.75 $27.88 $14.86
Regular Use $90.85 $45.43 $22.71 $12.11
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising $140.41 $70.20 $35.10 $18.72
Special Event $119.76 $59.88 $29.94 $15.97
Regular Use $99.11 $49.56 $24.78 $13.21
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “E”
Maple Ridge Library Meeting Rooms
Effective January 1, 2013
taxes extra Alouette Room Fraser Room
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial
Use $14.40 $20.70
Fundraising $7.20 $10.35
Special Event $3.60 $5.18
Regular Use $0.00 $0.00
Adult Non
Profit
Commercial
Use $14.40 $20.70
Fundraising $14.40 $20.70
Special Event $7.20 $15.70
Regular Use $0.00 $10.70
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising $21.60 $31.05
Special Event $18.00 $25.88
Regular Use $14.40 $20.70
Local Commercial
Fundraising $23.04 $33.12
Special Event $19.44 $27.95
Regular Use $15.84 $22.77
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising $24.48 $35.19
Special Event $20.88 $30.02
Regular Use $17.28 $24.84
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “F”
Maple Ridge Leisure Centre Admission Rates
Effective January 1, 2013
"Flexi" taxes extra
single 10 visits 20 visits 1 month 3 months 6 months 1 year
Children $2.90 $ 24.90 $ 44.20 $ 27.60 $ 70.38 $ 132.48 $ 264.96
Youth $3.71 $ 31.80 $ 56.50 $ 35.30 $ 90.02 $ 169.44 $ 338.88
Senior $3.71 $ 31.80 $ 56.50 $ 35.30 $ 90.02 $ 169.44 $ 338.88
Adult $5.70 $ 48.90 $ 86.90 $ 54.30 $ 138.47 $ 260.64 $ 521.28
Family $9.94 $ 85.30 $ 151.60 $ 94.70 $ 241.49 $ 454.56 $ 909.12
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “G”
Sports Fields
Municipal & School District 42
Effective January 1, 2013
taxes extra CLASS A CLASS B CLASS C
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial Use 22.07 16.44 5.49
Fundraising 11.04 8.22 2.75
Special Event 5.52 4.11 1.37
Regular Use 0.00 0.00 0.00
Formula was taken out for B16 and
C16
Adult Non Profit
Commercial Use 22.07 16.44 5.49
Fundraising 22.07 16.44 5.49
Special Event $17.07 $11.44 2.75
Regular Use $12.70 $6.65 0.00
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising 33.11 24.66 8.24
Special Event 27.59 20.55 6.86
Regular Use 22.07 16.44 5.49
Local Commercial
Fundraising 35.31 26.30 8.78
Special Event 29.79 22.19 7.41
Regular Use 24.28 18.08 6.04
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising 37.52 27.95 9.33
Special Event 32.00 23.84 7.96
Regular Use 26.48 19.73 6.59
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “H”
Drop In Skating Admission Rates Effective January 1, 2013
Pitt Meadows Arenas and Planet Ice Arena
taxes extra
single 10 visits 20 visits
Children $2.60 $ 22.40 $ 39.70
Youth $3.18 $ 27.30 $ 48.50
Senior $3.18 $ 27.30 $ 48.50
Adult $4.50 $ 38.70 $ 68.70
Family $7.57 $ 64.90 $ 115.40
Parent/Tot $3.76 $ 32.30 $ 57.30
(Adult + child under 3)
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “I”
SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD FEES AND CHARGES
Effective January 1, 2013
taxes extra
Samuel Robertson Sports Field
(per player, annually)
Youth
$10.00
Adult
$20.00
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “J”
Greg Moore Youth Centre
Effective January 1, 2013
taxes extra Multi-Purpose Lounge
Inside Active
Area
Whole
Facility
Youth/Senior Non
Profit
Commercial Use $17.61 $24.64 $73.90 $116.16
Fundraising $8.81 $12.32 $60.65 $81.78
Special Event $4.40 $6.16 $54.03 $64.60
Regular Use $0.00 $0.00 $42.66 $42.66
Adult Non Profit
Commercial Use $17.61 $24.64 $73.90 $116.16
Fundraising $17.61 $24.64 $73.90 $116.16
Special Event $12.61 $19.64 $68.90 $101.16
Regular Use $7.61 $14.64 $63.90 $86.16
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising $26.42 $36.96 $110.86 $174.24
Special Event $22.02 $30.80 $92.38 $145.20
Regular Use $17.61 $24.64 $73.90 $116.16
Local Commercial
Fundraising $28.18 $39.43 $118.25 $185.85
Special Event $23.78 $33.27 $99.77 $156.81
Regular Use $19.37 $27.11 $81.30 $127.78
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising $29.94 $41.89 $125.64 $197.47
Special Event $25.54 $35.73 $107.16 $168.43
Regular Use $21.13 $29.57 $88.69 $139.39
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “K”
Hammond Community Centre
Effective January 1, 2013
taxes extra Large Hall 1/2 Large Hall Small Hall (Preschool Rm)
Youth/Senior Non Profit
Commercial
Use $56.93 $28.47 $23.45
Fundraising $43.68 $21.84 $11.73
Special Event $37.06 $18.53 $5.86
Regular Use $27.39 $13.70 $0.00
Adult Non
Profit
Commercial
Use $56.93 $28.47 $23.45
Fundraising $56.93 $28.47 $23.45
Special Event $51.93 $25.97 $18.45
Regular Use $46.93 $23.47 $13.45
Local, Private or Political Groups
Fundraising $85.40 $42.70 $35.18
Special Event $71.17 $35.58 $29.32
Regular Use $56.93 $28.47 $23.45
Local Commercial
Fundraising $91.10 $45.55 $37.52
Special Event $76.86 $38.43 $31.66
Regular Use $62.63 $31.31 $25.80
Non Resident Groups
Fundraising $96.79 $48.39 $39.87
Special Event $82.56 $41.28 $34.01
Regular Use $68.32 $34.16 $28.14
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “L”
Park Shelter Fees
Effective January 1, 2013
taxes extra
Park Shelter
Rental $ 63.00
(Up to a full day)
Equipment Fee
Effective July 1, 2013
taxes extra
Event Trailer
$ 147.31
Tennis/Sport Court
Effective January 1, 2013
taxes extra
Courts
(commercial
use per hour)
$ 15.00
Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge
Bylaw No. 4117 – 1988
SCHEDULE “M”
Outdoor Pool Admissions
Effective January 1, 2013
Hammond Pool
taxes extra
single Season Pass
Children $1.60 $ 36.23
Youth $2.37 $ 39.85
Senior $2.37 $ 39.85
Adult $3.03 $ 44.63
Family $6.07 $ 98.86
Replacement Pass $5.00