HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-12-08 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfCity of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
December 8, 2015
7:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
Note: This Agenda is also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws
or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or
resolution.
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS
300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
401 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of November 24, 2015
402 Revised Minutes of the Public Hearing of November 17, 2015
403 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of
November 18 and 27, 2015
500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
600 DELEGATIONS
601 Farmer’s Market Update
•Eileen Dwillies, Executive Director
MEETING DECORUM
Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are
decided at Council meetings which affect many people’s lives. Therefore, we ask that
you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary
and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council
Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person’s behavior will be
reprimanded. The meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge
and filmed by Shaw Communications Inc.
Page 1
Council Meeting Agenda
December 8, 2015
Council Chamber
Page 2 of 8
602 Kanaka Education and Environmental Partnership Society (“KEEPS”)
• Ross Davies, Coordinator
700 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
800 CORRESPONDENCE
900 BYLAWS
Note: Items 901 to 903 are from the December 8, 2015 Public Hearing
Bylaws for Third Reading
901 2014-104-RZ, 23050 136 Avenue
901.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7167-2015
To designate land adjacent to proposed Lot 8 from Eco Clusters to
Conservation
Third reading
901.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7124-2014
To rezone from R-1 (Residential District) and R-3 (Special Amenity
Residential District) to R-2 (Urban Residential District) to permit a future
subdivision of 18 lots
Third reading
902 2015-181-RZ, 12117 Laity Street
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7158-2015
To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-1 (Residential
District) to permit a future subdivision of approximately 6 lots
Third reading
903 2012-013-RZ, 24152 112 Avenue
903.1 Maple Ridge Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7040-2013
To designate from Institutional and Low Density Residential to
Low/Medium Density Residential, Conservation and Park
Third reading
Council Meeting Agenda
December 8, 2015
Council Chamber
Page 3 of 8
903.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7041-2013
To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family
Urban [Medium Density] Residential) and P-1 (Park and School) to permit a
future subdivision of approximately 25 lots and a neighbourhood park
Third reading
Bylaws for Final Reading
904 2014-012-RZ, 24263 and 24295 112 Avenue
Staff report dated December 8, 2015 recommending final reading
904.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7067-2014
To amend land use designation to allow for dedication of park for
conservation purposes
Final reading
904.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7065-2014
To rezone from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to RS-1b (One
Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to allow for approximately 12
single family lots
Final reading
905 2015-201-RZ, 22830 Nelson Court
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7163-2015
Staff report dated December 8, 2015 recommending final reading
To rezone from R-1 (Residential District) to R-2 (Urban Residential District)
to permit a future subdivision of 11 lots
Final reading
906 West Ridge Local Area Service Bylaw No. 7166-2015
To allow for enhanced landscape maintenance of road bioswales and two
rain gardens
Final reading
COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
1100 Minutes – November 16, 2015
The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with
the recommendations being brought to this meeting for City Council consideration and
final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held in
the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting.
Council Meeting Agenda
December 8, 2015
Council Chamber
Page 4 of 8
Public Works and Development Services
1101 2015-309-RZ, 21773, 21787 and 21795 Lougheed Highway, RS-1 to C-2
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7180-2015 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family
Urban Residential) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit construction
of a two-storey commercial building be given first reading and that the
applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C and D
of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
1102 2012-004-RZ, 23791 112 Avenue, RS-3 to R-1
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7159-2015 to designate from
Conservation to Urban Residential be given first and second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw
No. 7111-2014 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1
(Residential District) to permit a future subdivision of approximately 16 lots
be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
1103 2015-334-RZ, Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment, Use of Shipping Containers
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7184-2015 to direct the use of shipping
containers be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing.
1104 2015-361-RZ, Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment, 1 km Rule for Wine Stores in
Grocery Stores
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7190-2015 to prohibit the sale of liquor in any
grocery store located within one kilometer of a licensed retail store or
government liquor store be given first and second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing.
1105 Maple Ridge Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 be given first,
second and third readings, that Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization
Amending Bylaw No. 7191-2015 be given first, second and third readings
and that Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Amending Bylaw No.
7192-2015 be given first, second and third readings.
Council Meeting Agenda
December 8, 2015
Council Chamber
Page 5 of 8
1106 2011-130-RZ, 12240 228 Street, First One Year Extension
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that a first one year
extension be granted for Application 2011-130-RZ to rezone to the R-3
(Special Amenity Residential District) zone to permit a future subdivision
into approximately 4 single family lots not less than 292 m2 in area.
1107 2013-039-RZ, 20208 McIvor Avenue, First One Year Extension
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that a first one year
extension be granted for Application 2013-039-RZ to permit future
subdivision into 13 single family residential lots under the RS-1b (One
Family Urban [Medium Density] zone.
1108 2012-115-RZ, 12018, 12038 Edge Street and 22554, 22566 Brown
Avenue, Final One Year Extension
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that a final one year
extension be granted for Application 2012-115-RZ to permit a three phased
mixed use development consisting of 240 apartment units in three towers,
commercial floor area, underground parking and above ground structured
parking subject to the CD-1-13 (Comprehensive Development) zone,
1109 2014-065-DP, 22355 McIntosh Avenue, Multi-Family Development Permit
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2014-065-DP to permit renovation of
a podium style three storey wood frame apartment with 21 one bedroom
units over a first storey concrete building.
1110 2015-300-DP, 25467 Bosonworth Avenue
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2015-300-DP in support of a
development plan for a four (4) lot subdivision under RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) zoning.
1111 2014-086-SD, 5% Money in Lieu of Parkland Dedication
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that the owner of the
subject property pay an amount that is not less than $47,650.00.
Council Meeting Agenda
December 8, 2015
Council Chamber
Page 6 of 8
1112 Latecomer Policy
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that the Latecomer
Policy be adopted.
1113 Local Area Service – Hampton Street Extension Bylaw No. 7178-2015
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Hampton Street Extension Bylaw No. 7178-2015 to establish road, storm
sewer, sanitary sewer and water services on the 20100 Block of Hampton
Street be given first, second and third readings.
Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police)
1131 2016-2020 Financial Plan Bylaw
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
2016-2020 Financial Plan Bylaw No. 7194-2015 be given first and second
readings. Note: Report was circulated separately.
Community Development and Recreation Service
1151 Festivals and Special Events Review Process
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 providing information on the current
structure of special events/festivals and a proposed outline of the review
process.
1152 Subsidized Ice Allocation – Minor Sports
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 providing information on subsidized
ice allocation available to minor sport groups in Maple Ridge and Pitt
Meadows.
1153 Leisure Centre Pool Renovations Contract Award
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and execute Construction Contract ITT-PL15-
67 with Mierau Contractors Limited for construction of the Maple Ridge
Leisure Centre Pool, mechanical and filtration system and that a
contingency of 10% for the contract be established.
Correspondence
1171
Council Meeting Agenda
December 8, 2015
Council Chamber
Page 7 of 8
Other Committee Issues
1181
1200 STAFF REPORTS
1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL
1400 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
1500 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING
1600 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Council Meeting Agenda
December 8, 2015
Council Chamber
Page 8 of 8
1700 ADJOURNMENT
Checked by:________________ Date: ________________
QUESTION PERIOD
The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to
ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of
Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium).
Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual
members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes.
Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the
information required to provide a complete and accurate response.
Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings,
delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to
Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and
information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to
have a voice in the future of this community.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk’s Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca.
Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca.
City of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 24, 2015
The Minutes of the City Council Meeting held on November 24, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in
the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British
Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business.
PRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Mayor N. Read F. Quinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer/General
Councillor C. Bell Manager Public Works and Development Services
Councillor K. Duncan K. Swift, General Manager of Community Development,
Councillor B. Masse Parks and Recreation Services
Councillor G. Robson C. Carter, Director of Planning
Councillor T. Shymkiw C. Marlo, Manager of Legislative Services
Councillor C. Speirs A. Gaunt, Confidential Secretary
Other staff as required
C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental
Services
R. MacNair, Manager of Bylaws and Licences
Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
The meeting was live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS
Councillor Speirs announced that he will put forward a motion under item
1400 directing staff to prepare a bylaw to bring forward a 1 km rule for
liquor stores.
300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
The agenda was approved with the addition of item 1401.
401
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 2 of 15
400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
401 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of November 10, 2015
R/2015-501
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of November 10, 2015 be
adopted as circulated.
CARRIED
402 Minutes of the Public Hearing of November 17, 2015
R/2015-502
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Public Hearing of November 17, 2015 be adopted
as circulated.
CARRIED
403 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meeting of November
5, 2015
R/2015-503
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meeting of
November 15, 2015 be received.
CARRIED
500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL – Nil
600 DELEGATIONS – Nil
700 UNFINISHED BUSINESS – Nil
800 CORRESPONDENCE – Nil
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 3 of 15
900 BYLAWS
Note: Items 901 to 902 are from the November 17, 2015 Public Hearing
Bylaws for Third Reading
901 2015-201-RZ, 22830 Nelson Court
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7163-2015
To rezone from R-1 (Residential District) to R-2 (Urban Residential District)
to permit a future subdivision of 11 lots
Third reading
R/2015-504
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7163-2015 be given third reading.
CARRIED
Note: Mayor Read excused herself from discussion of Item 902 as she lives a
block away from the proposed development. Councillor Duncan assumed
the Chair.
902 2013-086-RZ, 23262 Silver Valley Road 13738, 13702 and 13660 232
Street
902.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7160-2015
To revise land use designation boundaries and an equestrian trail location
Third reading
R/2015-505
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7160-2015 be given third reading.
CARRIED
902.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013
To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), RST-SV (Street
Townhouse – Silver Valley), RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density]
Residential), P-1 (Park and School), R-1 (Residential District) and C-5
(Village Centre Commercial) to permit a future subdivision of approximately
51 single family lots, 16 street townhouse lots, one commercial lot, and
future neighbourhood park
Third reading
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 4 of 15
R/2015-506
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7023-2013 be given third reading.
CARRIED
Note: Mayor Read returned to the meeting at 7:20 p.m. and resumed as Chair
Bylaws for Final Reading
903 Maple Ridge Intermunicipal Business Licence Scheme Amending Bylaw No.
7175 -2015
To amend the existing bylaw to include changes to remove the provisions
identifying the program as a pilot, add the Corporation of Delta & the
District of Kent to the list of participants, revise the revenue sharing
method to a more sustainable formula, and expand the definition of
“Mobile Business” to expand the scope of businesses that will be eligible to
purchase an IMBL
Final reading
The Manager of Bylaw & Licence Services provided clarification on the
process of revoking business licences.
R/2015-507
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7175-2015 be adopted.
CARRIED
COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Minutes – November 16, 2015
R/2015-508
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting of November 16,
2015 be received.
CARRIED
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 5 of 15
Public Works and Development Services
1101 2015-279-RZ, 22833 122 Avenue, RS-1 to R-3
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7182-2015 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family
Urban Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) for
subdivision into three single family lots be given first reading and that the
applicant provide further information as described on Schedule B of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
R/2015-509
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7182-2015 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule B
of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the
information required for an Intensive Residential Development Permit and
a Subdivision application.
CARRIED
Note: Councillor Duncan excused herself from the discussion of Item 1102 at
7:23 p.m. as she has property one block from the application.
1102 2015-297-RZ, 11305, 11383, 11438 and 11428 232 Street and 23025,
23054, 23060, 23070,23075, 23089 and 23095 Lougheed Highway, RS-
3 to R-2, RM-1 and C-1
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7183-2015 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family
Rural Residential) to R-2 (Urban Residential District), RM-1 (Townhouse
Residential) and C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) be given first reading
and that the applicant provide a voluntary community amenity contribution
and further information as described on Schedules A, B, C, D, F and G of
the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
R/2015-510
It was moved and seconded
1. In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement
for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official
Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is
required with specifically:
i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by
the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community
Plan;
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 6 of 15
ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area
covered by the plan;
iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area
covered by the plan;
iv. First Nations;
v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district
boards; and
vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
2. and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation
be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the
proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s website,
together with an invitation to the public to comment, and;
3. That Bylaw No. 7183-2015 be given first reading subject to the
following term and condition being met prior to Final Reading:
• A voluntary citywide Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) be
provided in keeping with the direction given by Council with
regards to amenities; and
4. That the applicant provide further information as described on
Schedules A, B, C, D, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw
No. 5879–1999, along with the information required in this report
respecting the provision of amenities and amenity contributions to
address the increased demand generated by new residents and the
employees arising from the proposal.
CARRIED
Councillor Robson, Councillor Speirs - OPPOSED
Note: Councillor Duncan returned to the meeting at 7:50 p.m.
1103 2014-104-RZ, 23050 136 Avenue, R-1 and R-3 to R-2
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7167-2015 to designate land
adjacent to proposed Lot 8 from Eco Clusters to Conservation be given first
and second hearings and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple
Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7124-2014 to rezone from R-1
(Residential District) and R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) to R-2
(Urban Residential District) to permit a future subdivision of 12 lots be
given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 7 of 15
R/2015-511
It was moved and seconded
1) That, in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act,
opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided by
way of posting Bylaw No. 7167-2015 on the municipal website, and
Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation
opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw;
2) That Bylaw No. 7167-2015 be considered in conjunction with the
Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
3) That it be confirmed that Bylaw No. 7167-2015 is consistent with the
Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
4) That Bylaw No. 7167-2015 be given first and second readings and be
forwarded to Public Hearing;
5) That Bylaw No. 7124-2014 be given second reading, and be forwarded
to Public Hearing;
6) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive
Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in
the Agreement;
ii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule “A”, Chapter
10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley Figure 2 - Land Use Plan, Figure 3A -
Blaney Hamlet and Figure 4 - Trails / Open Space.
iii) Park dedication as required and removal of all debris and garbage
from park land;
iv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the geotechnical report
which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the
proposed development;
v) Removal of existing buildings, and
vi) A voluntary citywide Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) be
provided in keeping with the direction given by Council with regard
to amenities.
CARRIED
1104 2015-283-RZ, 14160 and 14170 256 Street, Site Specific Text
Amendment
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7177-2015 to permit the cleaning of low hazard
transformers and the storage and minor processing of hydrocarbons be
given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 8 of 15
1105 2012-013-RZ, 24152 112 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-1b and P-1, Update Report
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7040-2013 to designate from
Institutional and Low Density Residential to Low/Medium Density
Residential and Park and to adjust the conservation area be given first and
second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7041-2013 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family
Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density]
Residential) and P-1 (Park and School) to allow for future subdivision into
approximately 25 lots and a neighbourhood park using the Density Bonus
option be given second reading as amended and be forwarded to Public
Hearing.
R/2015-512
It was moved and seconded
1) That Bylaw No. 7040-2013 be given first and second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing;
2) That, in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act,
opportunity for early and ongoing consultation has been provided by
way of posting Bylaw No. 7040-2013 on the municipal website and
requiring that the applicant host a Development Information Meeting
(DIM), and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further
consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing
on the bylaw;
3) That Bylaw No. 7040-2013 be considered in conjunction with the
Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
4) That it be confirmed that Bylaw No. 7040-2013 is consistent with the
Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
5) That Bylaw No. 7041-2013, as amended in the Council report dated
January 5, 2015, be given second reading and be forwarded to
Public Hearing;
6) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a
Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security,
as outlined in the Agreement;
ii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule "A", Chapter
10.2 Albion Area Plan, Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan and
Schedule “C”;
iii) Road dedication on 112 Avenue, as required;
iv) Park dedication as required, including construction of multi-
purpose trails;
v) A letter assuring that removal of all debris and garbage from
park land has occurred;
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 9 of 15
vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the geotechnical
report which addresses the suitability of the subject property
for the proposed development;
vii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater
Management;
viii) Removal of existing buildings;
ix) In addition to the Site Profile, a disclosure statement must be
submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is
any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject
property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required
to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site;
and
x) That a voluntary Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) be
provided in keeping with the direction given by Council with
regard to amenities.
CARRIED
Councillor Robson - OPPOSED
1106 2013-041-SD, 20738 123 Avenue, Local Area Service
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that West Ridge
Local Area Service Bylaw No. 7166-2015 to allow for enhanced landscape
maintenance of road bioswales and two rain gardens be given first, second
and third readings.
R/2015-513
It was moved and seconded
1. That a Local Area Service Bylaw, as formally petitioned by the
developer of the lands referred to as ‘West Ridge’, and per the
Community Charter, Part 7, Division 5, 211 (1)(a), be authorized for the
enhanced landscape maintenance costs to be levied on the benefitting
properties to be created by subdivision of the land; and further
2. That Bylaw No. 7166-2015 be given first, second and third readings.
CARRIED
1107 2012-119-RZ, 24108 104 Avenue and 10336 240A Street, First One Year
Extension
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that a first one year
extension be granted for Application 2012-119-RZ to permit 97 townhouse
units under the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone.
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 10 of 15
R/2015-514
It was moved and seconded
That a one year extension be granted to rezoning application 2012-119-RZ
and that the following conditions be addressed prior to consideration of
final reading:
i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure;
ii. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive
Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the
Agreement;
iii. Consolidation of the development site;
iv. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant at the
Land Title Office which addresses the suitability of the site for the
proposed development;
v. Registration of a Cross Access Easement Agreement at the Land Title
Office;
vi. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant at the Land Title Office
protecting the Visitor Parking;
vii. Removal of the existing buildings; and
viii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional
Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel
storage tanks.
CARRIED
1108 2014-012-RZ, 24263 112 Avenue and 24295 112 Avenue, First One Year
Extension
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that a first one year
extension be granted for Application 2014-012-RZ to allow for future
subdivision of approximately 12 single family lots.
R/2015-515
It was moved and seconded
That a one year extension be granted for rezoning application 2014-012-RZ
and that the following conditions be addressed prior to consideration of
Final Reading:
i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive
Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the
Agreement;
ii. Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2
Albion Area Plan, Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan and Schedule “C”;
iii. Park dedication as required, including construction of an equestrian
trail;
iv. A letter assuring that removal of all debris and garbage from park land
has occurred;
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 11 of 15
v. Consolidation of the subject properties;
vi. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the geotechnical report,
which addresses the suitability of the subject properties for the
proposed development;
vii. Removal of existing buildings; and
viii. In addition to the Site Profile, a disclosure statement must be
submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any
evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject
properties. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to
ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site.
CARRIED
1109 2014-024-RZ, 24990 110 Avenue, First One Year Extension
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that a first one year
extension be granted for Application 2014-024-RZ to permit future
subdivision into 5 single family lots under the RS-1b (One Family Urban
[Medium Density] Residential) zone.
R/2015-516
It was moved and seconded
That a one year extension be granted for rezoning application 2014-024-RZ
and that the following conditions be addressed prior to consideration of
final reading:
i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive
Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the
Agreement;
ii. Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule "B";
iii. Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule “A”, Chapter 10.2
Albion Area Plan, Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan, and Figure 1:
Northeast Albion.
iv. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant at the
Land Title Office which addresses the suitability of the site for the
proposed development;
v. Removal of the existing buildings within the area to be rezoned;
vi. In addition to a Site Profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted
by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of
underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a Stage
1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject
property is not a contaminated site.
CARRIED
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 12 of 15
1110 2011-089-DP, 22309, 22319 and 22331 St. Anne Avenue
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2011-089-DP to govern form and
character of a proposed apartment building and site landscaping.
1111 2015-287-DP, 22309, 22319 and 22331 St. Anne Avenue
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2015-287-DP to govern the
conservation works for the Morse/Turnock Residence.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services provided an
explanation as to why Items 1110 and 1111 were withdrawn.
1112 2015-151-SP, 9842 264 Street, Soil Deposit Permit
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that Application
2015-151-SP for a fill permit to improve agricultural utilization of the
property be approved and be forwarded to the Agricultural Land
Commission.
R/2015-517
It was moved and seconded
That the application for a fill permit under Section 20 (3) of the Agricultural
Land Commission Act submitted for the property at 9842 264 Street be
approved through resolution by Council and forwarded to the Agricultural
Land Commission.
DEFEATED
Mayor Read, Councillor Bell, Councillor Duncan, Councillor Masse,
Councillor Robson, Councillor Speirs - OPPOSED
1113 Ridge Brewing Company Ltd. Liquor License Amendment Application –
Brewery Lounge Endorsement
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that the application
by Ridge Brewing Company Ltd. for a brewery lounge endorsement not be
supported and that a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor
Control and Licensing Branch.
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 13 of 15
R/2015-518
It was moved and seconded
1. That the application by Ridge Brewing Company Ltd. at #2 – 22826
Dewdney Trunk Road Maple Ridge for a brewery lounge endorsement,
as an amendment to Liquor License No. 306440, the existing Liquor
Primary License not be supported based on the information contained
in the Council report dated November 16, 2015.
2. That a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor Control and
Licensing Branch in accordance with the legislative requirements.
R/2015-519
It was moved and seconded
That Item 1113 be deferred to the December 8, 2015 Council Meeting.
DEFERRAL DEFEATED
Mayor Read, Councillor Bell, Councillor Robson,
Councillor Masse – OPPOSED
MOTION CARRIED
Councillor Speirs - OPPOSED
Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police)
1131 Proposed Cellular Tower at Golden Ears Park
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that satisfactory
completion of the public consultation process by Rogers Communications
Inc. be acknowledged and that there were no objections to the proposed
cellular communications tower for Golden Ears Park.
R/2015-520
It was moved and seconded
That satisfactory completion of the Public Consultation process by Rogers
Communications Inc. is acknowledged and there were no objections to the
proposed cellular communications tower for Golden Ears Park.
CARRIED
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 14 of 15
1132 Disbursements for the month ended October 31, 2015
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that the
disbursements for the month ended October 31, 2015 be received for
information.
R/2015-521
It was moved and seconded
That the disbursements as listed below for the month ended October 31,
2015 be received for information only.
General $10,701,848.
Payroll $ 2,672,380.
Purchase Card $ 98,401.
$ 13,472,629.
CARRIED
1133 2015 Council Expenses
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 providing on update on Council
expenses to the end of October for 2015.
For information only
No motion required
1134 Adjustments to 2015 Collector’s Rolls
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 submitting information on changes
to the 2015 Collector’s Roll through the issuance of Supplementary Rolls 7
and 8.
For information only
No motion required
Community Development and Recreation Service – Nil
Correspondence – Nil
Other Committee Issues – Nil
1200 STAFF REPORTS – Nil
Council Minutes
November 24, 2015
Page 15 of 15
1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL – Nil
1400 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
1401 Motion by Councillor Speirs
R/2015-522
It was moved and seconded
That the City hereby begin the preparation of a zoning amendment bylaw in
the form of the bylaw attached as Appendix 'H' of the staff report dated
August 31, 2015 to prohibit the sale of liquor in any grocery store located
within one kilometre of a licensee retail store or government liquor store."
CARRIED
1500 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS – Nil
1600 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Allen Lees
Mr. Lees spoke about the draft tree protection bylaw. He expressed
concern that heritage trees such as those on Shady Lane will not be
protected under the new bylaw and asked that protection be included in
the proposed bylaw. He asked how Council will address a public backlash
when unprotected trees are cut down.
Jessie Joy Lees
Ms. Lees expressed concern with impact of exemptions and the lack of
protection for trees, particularly heritage trees, and aquifers within the
proposed tree protection bylaw.
1700 ADJOURNMENT – 8:38 p.m.
_______________________________
N. Read, Mayor
Certified Correct
___________________________________
C. Marlo, Corporate Officer
City of Maple Ridge
PUBLIC HEARING
November 17, 2015
The Minutes of the Public Hearing held in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 11995 Haney
Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia on November 17, 2015 at 7:00 p.m.
____________________________________________________________________________
PRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Mayor N. Read F. Quinn, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
Councillor C. Bell C. Marlo, Manager of Legislative Services
Councillor K. Duncan C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental
Councillor B. Masse Services
Councillor G. Robson C. Carter, Director of Planning
Councillor T. Shymkiw
Councillor C. Speirs
______________________________________________________________________________
Mayor Read called the meeting to order. The Manager of Legislative Services explained the
procedure and rules of order of the Public Hearing and advised that the bylaws will be
considered further at the next Council Meeting on November 24, 2015.
The Mayor then called upon the Manager of Development and Environmental Services to
present the following items on the agenda:
1)2015-201-RZ
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7163-2015
Legal:Lot A, Section 29, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan
EPP27906 Except Plans EPP39985, EPP32166, and EPP52568
Location: 22830 Nelson Court
From: R-1 (Residential District)
To: R-2 (Urban Residential District)
Purpose: To permit a future subdivision of 11 lots
The Manager of Legislative Services advised that no correspondence was received on this
item.
402
Public Hearing Minutes
November 17, 2015
Page 2 of 5
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a power point presentation
providing the following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Neighbourhood Context
• Official Community Plan Context
• Site Characteristics
• Development Proposal
• Proposed Subdivision Plan
• Terms and Conditions
There being no comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
Note: Mayor Read excused herself from the discussion of Item 2 at 7:08 p.m. as she lives
in the vicinity of the property. Deputy Mayor Shymkiw assumed the Chair.
Councillor Robson joined the meeting at 7:09 p.m.
2a) 2013-086-RZ
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7160-2015
Legal: Lot 1, Except: Part dedicated Road on Plan 68113, Section 33,
Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 20132; Lot 8, Block A,
Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 2409;
Parcel B (668484E), Lot 9, Block A, Section 33, Township 12, New
Westminster District, Plan 2409; Lot 4, Section 33, Township 12, New
Westminster District, Plan 20132
Location: 23262 Silver Valley Road, 13738, 13702 and 13660 232 Street
Purpose: To Amend Schedule “A of the Official Community Plan as follows:
Chapter 10.3, Section 5.3 Hamlets, Subsection 5.3.3 items a), b) and
c): to allow a small commercial area that is typically between 90-140
m2 in the Blaney, Forest, and Horse Hamlets.
Chapter 10.3, Section 7.0 Design Guidelines, Subsection 7.2 Design
Guidelines for Hamlets, Sub section 7.2.1 Uses, item e): to allow on-
site parking for commercial uses in Silver Valley Hamlets.
Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley, Figure 2 - Land Use Plan and
Figure 3A - Blaney Hamlet is hereby amended to adjust the existing
land use boundaries as outlined in heavy black line as shown on Map
No. 910.
Public Hearing Minutes
November 17, 2015
Page 3 of 5
Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley, and Figure 4 - Trails / Open
Space, is hereby amended to adjust the existing land use boundaries
and trail location as outlined in heavy black line as shown on Map No.
911.
2b) 2013-086-RZ
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013
Legal: Lot 1, Except: Part dedicated Road on Plan 68113, Section 33,
Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 20132; Lot 8, Block A,
Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 2409;
Parcel B (668484E), Lot 9, Block A, Section 33, Township 12, New
Westminster District, Plan 2409; Lot 4, Section 33, Township 12, New
Westminster District, Plan 20132
Location: 23262 Silver Valley Road, 13738, 13702 and 13660 232 Street
From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
To: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
RST-SV (Street Townhouse – Silver Valley)
RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential)
P-1 (Park and School)
R-1 (Residential District) and
C-5 (Village Centre Commercial)
Purpose: To permit a future subdivision of approximately 51 single family lots,
16 street townhouse lots, one commercial lot, and future
neighbourhood park
The Manager of Legislative Services advised that correspondence was received from Jackie
Chow, and correspondence opposing the application was received from Heather and Peter
Meisner and Sarah Lee.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a power point presentation
providing the following information:
• Application Information
• Project Revisions
• Subject Map
• Neighbourhood Context
• Official Community Plan Context
• Site Characteristics
• Commercial Site Plan
Public Hearing Minutes
November 17, 2015
Page 4 of 5
• Street View Rendering
• Revised Commercial Elevations
• Original Commercial Elevations
• Terms and Conditions
Ken Knechtel
Mr. Knechtel commented on the choice of street trees, placement of a pond and the
development of the integrated storm water management plan for Silver Valley
Dian Murrell
Ms. Murrell expressed concerns with storm water management and the impact on the
lowlands. She requested the application be deferred until the hydrology study integrated
storm water management plan is completed.
Terry Dumas
Ms. Dumas commented on the run-off that is coming down from the Silver Valley area. She
suggested that the drainage for the area needs to be addressed prior to the development of
this property.
Nona Coles
Ms. Coles disagreed with moving the creek and challenged Council to implement a higher
standard for storm water control. She expressed concern that the impact on lowlands is not
fully understood.
Ken Knechtel
Mr. Knechtel spoke to impacts of climate change on drainage from Silver Valley. He
referenced Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 4800-1993.
Dian Murrell
Ms. Murrell objects to the rerouting of Cattell Brook as she feels it is a fish bearing stream.
Ken Knechtel
Mr. Knechtel read requirements under Bylaw No. 5065-1994. He noted that under this
bylaw, documentation related to the water management on this application would be
required from the General Manager, Operational Services. He reiterated concerns with the
impact of water drainage from the proposed subdivision on lower lying areas.
Brad Gordon
Mr. Gordon asked if there would be design controls, expressed concern that the illustrations
did not look like current homes in the area. He also expressed concerns with parking and
that smaller houses will produce more concrete. He indicated that he would like to see
more green space.
Revised December 8, 2015
Public Hearing Minutes
November 17, 2015
Page 5 of 5
Barry Lyster
Mr. Lyster echoed what was said on drainage. He commented on increased traffic issues on
132nd Avenue resulting from the proposed development.
Wayne Bissky, Applicant Representative
Mr. Bissky advised that storm water management has been planned in accordance with the
required standards, that the application complies with the Official Community Plan and will
bring amenities to the area. He also advised that zoning bylaws and street design
requirements were adhered to by the applicant.
There being no further comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
Having given all those persons whose interests were deemed affected by the matters
contained herein a chance to be heard, the Mayor terminated the Public Hearing at
7:47 p.m.
____________________________
N. Read, Mayor
Certified Correct
______________________________
C. Marlo, Corporate Officer
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7167-2015
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014
_______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule "A" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7167-2015”.
2.Schedule “A” Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley, Figure 2 - Land Use Plan and Figure 3A
- Blaney Hamlet are hereby amended for the parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 2 Section 29 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 5116 Except Plans BCP42569
and BCP48907
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 913, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this bylaw, is hereby designated as shown.
3.Schedule “A” Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley, Figure 4 - Trails / Open Space is hereby
amended for the parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 2 Section 29 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 5116 Except Plans BCP42569
and BCP48907
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 914, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this bylaw, is hereby designated as shown.
4.Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.7060-2014 as amended is hereby amended
accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME the 24th day of November, 2015.
READ A SECOND TIME the 24th day of November, 2015.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the 8th day of December, 2015.
READ A THIRD TIME the day of , 20 .
ADOPTED the day of , 20 .
___________________________________ _____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
901.1
1 3 6 A V E .
1 3 6 A V E .232 ST.135B AVE.230A ST.229 LOOP1 34 LO O P 230A ST.232 ST.136 AVE.
13474
13480
13466
229901359013610
1 3 5 6 2
1 3 5 0 3
134122295713516
13573
1 3 5 3 6
13508
134852302013565
1 3 5 1 9
22
995
1 3 5 4 2
13572 231541 3 5 4 5 2298223
036
13546
1 3 5 5 5
23012
1 3 5 4 5
13568
13407
1 3 4 8 5
2297513527
13501
23
019
13486
1 3 5 2 8
13637
231401 3 4 9 5 13578135792297622956 230601 3 5 5 7
134651 3 5 1 1
1 3 5 3 7
1349213582
13381229692295213509
13461
13517
2297223
025
23
001
1338522990 13586
13490
1 3 5 2 5
229601
3
4
7
813530
2320913569 231062310323
02022930 23
0281347522975 230412314113517
13426
22
987
13547
1 3 5 2 1 231832299613625 229692296323006230121 3 5 2 9
1 3 5 6 3
13439
13631
2296623
007
1351622945 2303122811
13493
23002
1
3
4
6
8
23
0132296213531
13429
229862295113442/58
1
3
4
7
2
13575
2298113602 (PUMP STATION)
13449229181358513550
13500
1 3 5 5 6
23
031
13477
22978229962305013616
13486 13493
229661 3 5 3 723000 1358923027
29
PARK
B
4
18
42
13
D
43
61
75
52
2
PARK
46
9
40
26
69
5
60
36
PARK
44
62
27
36
62
21
50
Re m 6
65
72
48
17
53
24
35
Re m 1
27
7
21
56
45
34
A
47
A
25
73
71
70
49
19
38
57
2
68
34
61
PARK
74
19
14
18
PARK
18
5
6
10
41
17
51
63
30
23
9
55
11
12
12
E
18
20
10
72
1
2
54
28
13
67
73
23
66
15
Re m. 2
37
64
16
20 20
1
35
19
6
B
PARK
7
8
22
59
19
8
31
11
3
58 A
3
32
39
22
33
77
4
53
52
51
PARK
PARK
50
49
48 P 8 175
B C P 2 7 8 8 5
BCP 515 04EPP 52568E P P 4 9 1 3 8
P 5 116
P 21219
P 7 855
EP 15824
P 11173
BC P 2 7 8 8 5
P 43567
BCP 515 04
*PP154
E P P 3 2 1 6 6
P 43567BCP 33861EPP 44 84 6
BC P 493 03
BCP 49303
P 11173
BCP 48906
EPP 44 84 6
BCP 51504BCP 33861LMP 9042
P 19056
BCP 48907
P 8 175BCP 51504BCP 48906 BCP 49303BCP 49303BCP 49303BCP 49303RP 11765BCP 27893E P P 4 9 22 7
BCP 27 88 7
B
C
P 4
9
3
0
5
BCP 49304
B C P 5 1 5 0 6BCP 51506BCP 48909BCP 49342BCP
5
1
5
0
6 BCP 48909BCP 51505
BCP 51506
BCP 48909
BCP 48908
BCP 42569
BCP 48909BCP 29525
E
P
P
3
3
3
6
6
BCP 49304
B C P 4 9 3 0 6
EPP 52781
´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose:
From:To:
To Amend Figure 2 (Land Use Plan) and 3A (Blaney Hamlet)of the Silver Valley Area PlanEco ClusterConservation
7167-2015913
1 3 6 A V E .
1 3 6 A V E .232 ST.135B AVE.230A ST.229 LOOP1 34 LO O P 230A ST.232 ST.136 AVE.1359013474
13480
13466
2299013610
1 3 5 6 2
13573
1 3 5 3 6
1 3 5 0 3
13412
1356522957
13516
23012
1 3 4 8 5 13485
13508 2302013527
1 3 5 1 9
1 3 5 4 2
22
995
13572
13501 231541 3 5 4 5 2298223
036
13546
1 3 5 5 5
1 3 5 4 5
13568
1340722976229751348623019134751346513582
13381229722314013528
1 3 4 9 5
13637
1 3 5 5 7
2295613579 230601 3 5 3 7
22969135782295213492
23
025
13509
13517
23
0012299013525
1 3 5 1 1
13461
13385
13586
13490
23
020
1
3
4
7
8
2296013493
23209231062293023
0282297513531 231031353013426
13569 231412304113517
22
987
229961 3 5 2 1 23183230062296313547
13625 22969230121 3 5 6 3
13439
1 3 5 2 9
13631
2294523
0072296613516 2303122811
1
3
4
6
8
23002
2298613575
23
013
134292295122962 13442/582291813585
1
3
4
7
2
2298113602 (PUMP STATION)
13477
1 3 5 5 6
1344922996135502305023031
13486
13500
13616
2297813493
22966230001 3 5 3 7 2302713589
29
PARK
B
4
18
42
13
D
75
43
61
62
2
52
PARK
21
46
9
48
40
26
60
5
69
36
7
44
27
PARK
36
62
53
35
Re m 6
72
50
65
24
17
Re m 1
5
27
A21
25
45
56
A
4734
49
19
73
70
57
34
38
2
71
PARK68
PARK
19
61
41
18
74
18
14
6
10
17
23
35
5130
63
19
9
11 12
10
55
12
73
54
E
Re m. 2
18
8
20
72
13
1
2
37
28
67
20
66
15
23
64
B
32
1
8
PARK
16
22
7
20
22
6
77
59
31
3
19
A58
3
11
39
33
4
53
52
51
PARK
PARK
50
49
48 P 8 175
B C P 2 7 8 8 5
BCP 515 04EPP 52568E P P 4 9 1 3 8
P 5 116
P 21219
P 7 855
EP 15824
P 11173
BC P 2 7 8 8 5
P 43567
BCP 515 04
*PP154
E P P 3 2 1 6 6
P 43567BCP 33861EPP 44 84 6
BC P 493 03
BCP 49303
P 11173
BCP 48906
EPP 44 84 6
BCP 51504BCP 33861LMP 9042
P 19056
BCP 48907
P 8 175BCP 51504BCP 48906 BCP 49303BCP 49303BCP 49303BCP 49303RP 11765BCP 27893E P P 4 9 22 7
BCP 27 88 7
B
C
P 4
9
3
0
5
BCP 49304
B C P 5 1 5 0 6BCP 51506BCP 48909BCP 49342BCP
5
1
5
0
6 BCP 48909BCP 51505
BCP 51506
BCP 48909
BCP 48908
BCP 42569
BCP 48909BCP 29525
E
P
P
3
3
3
6
6
BCP 49304
B C P 4 9 3 0 6
EPP 52781
´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose:To Add to Conservation on Figure 4 (Trails/Open Space) of the Silver Valley Area Plan as shown
7167-2015914
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7124-2014
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7124-2014."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 2 Section 29 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 5116 Except Plans
BCP42569 and BCP48907
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1632 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-2 (Urban Residential District).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 10th day of February, 2015.
READ a second time the 24th day of November, 2015.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 8th day of December, 2015.
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
901.2
13625 229571 3 5 6 3
22956
229661 3 5 5 6
1
3
4
7
2
2299023002
1 3 5 5 5
13589
13439
13449
13547
13385
13516
13637
229452296322969229751 3 4 9 5
1346513590135782298622
995
13516
23
00723013
13461
134932295122962
2296922982229811 3 5 4 2
13492
13508
23012 23
025 231032314113407
13527
134122291813531
1 3 5 3 7
1 3 5 1 1
1 3 5 0 3
134751
3
4
7
8
1 3 5 3 6
1 3 5 4 5
13575 230502306013546
13426
13631
229521 3 5 5 7
1 3 5 2 522976 13610
13572
13486
1 3 5 3 7
13477
13485
13493
1 3 5 2 1
23
02823031 2318313517
13602 (PUMP STATIO N)
13616
13442/58
1 3 5 4 5 13579229751
3
4
6
8
1 3 5 6 2
1 3 5 5 0
2299613565
23
020
13501
13517
1 3 5 2 9
23
036 2310623140134291353022930135692296013485
1 3 5 1 913585 135822299022
987 23
001
1 3 5 2 8
13490
1357322966
229722297813568
13500
23
019
13509 2315413381
13586230A ST.232 ST.1 34 LO O P
1 3 6 A V E .232 ST.229 LOOP135B AVE.1 3 6 A V E .230A ST.BC P 27 8 85
20
21
13
BCP 51 5 04
BCP 49303
BC P 49 3 03
68
8
35
3
46
18
2
19
17
25
24
64
11
2
66
57
30
39
PARK
41
2
51
17
P 43567
A
Rem 1
P 8175
P 8175
5
19
27
BCP 48906
14
35
BCP 4930374
67
7
PARK
52BCP 49303BCP 515041
48
44
PARK
P 43567
RP 11765
P 11173
4
Rem A
16
15
36
21
22
27
29
4
70
34BCP 4930371
43
PARK
EPP 44846PARK
B
3
6
20
22
72
65
59
BCP 51 5 04
31BCP 4930333
32
50
EP 15824
P 19056
B
D
Rem A
62
18
34 BCP 33861E P P 3 21 6 6
62
26
23
75BC P 27 8 85
63
28
1
56
6
54 53
40
45
EPP 44846
LM P 9042 P 7855
P 11173
A
A
61
20
60 58
9
55
5
69
37
72BCP 5150473
Rem . 2
P 21219
Rem 6
77
18
18
PARK
19
23
12
73
10
38
36
PARK
49
47
42
BCP 48906
BCP 48907
PARK
P 5116
19
*PP154
E
7
´
SCALE 1:3 ,0 00
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
R-1 (Residential District)R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District))R-2 (Urban Residential District)
7124-20141632
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7158-2015
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7158-2015."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Parcel “E” (Reference Plan 3460) District Lot 242 Group 1 Except: The North 180
feet, New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1640 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 28th day of July, 2015.
READ a second time the 10th day of November, 2015.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 8th day of December, 2015.
READ a third time the day of , 20
APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of
, 20
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
902
211522116621161211782119012090
12098 2123112089
12025
12161 21295120391204712022 21322213281202821334
2114221149211602117021175211932120112073
12081
12171
12062
12070
12086
12186
120232129221312
12010211502115321167211752117821188211891202012037
12145
12156 213012130921321120591 2 0 3 221151211552118521190/92211991205021221 12061
12117
12020
12032
12044
12031 2131421311213231203621145211442115421158211652116121175211912119512069 2121121196/982120712116 212972130012007
12011
12015
12018 213192114712038
1207021210 12101 21282212901201321299 1206321146211492117012101-53
2120021220212412123012047 12050
12056
12128
12138
213181205521328211462118821198212002124012196
12014
120261205121320 21327WICKLUND AVE.
122 AVE.McINTYRE CT.212 ST.McINTYRE CT.
121 AVE.LAITY ST.CAMPBELL AVE.
P 15470
293
10
156 155
297
2
1
*LMP 23192P 62355
130
P 59 0 03
B
BCP 161921
2 1114P 70 7 21
22 2
25 6P 4667223 3
310
P 47383
6
308
P 53420 P 46290P 47383 NWS 1462P 15078
5
304
P 14112
358
303
300
P 47517
EP1 62 8 5
1
66LMP 413381
28 7P 601004
22 0 22 1P 56 8 96
P 5798025 3
22 4
10 9
309
126
154
298
357
Rem N 180' E
4
P 8790
360
of 2
A
BCP 303
2
4
3
18 6
25 9
25 5 Rem 323 8Rem 4P 56 8 96
292
NWS 336
11
5
295
301
181
3
Rem 1
3
3
P 74 5 04P 1468667P 32 5 05
23423525 7 25 2
P 74 9 9of 3P 36 5 19
P 56 8 96
P 79726
2
120
305
2
122
Rem E
359
P 378892
2
1
2
W 100'25 8P 53420
P 19872
157
294 P 48094306
296
P 77954
P 53420
2
6
124 P 3460125
C
D P 9327PARKRem 2
23 1
P 56 8 96
23 7
23 0
25 1
25 4
158
1
4
175
119110
302
P 53420
182
Rem 1
Rem N 1 /2
P 47 0 1
LMP 57 683
P 57 9 80
68
22 9
22 3
LMP 11122 PL.
(EP 47384)
P 48094
121
1
P 58583
P 53420
299
P 47383
P 48995
P 47383
E
2
of S 1 /2
A
P 74 9 9
Rem 2
23 2
23622 5
RW 18394
EP 53421LMP 39636P 62150EP 53421 LMP 38963LMP 5769
LMP 39238LMP 38783 LMP 39238RW 18394
LAITY ST.W ICK LUN D AV E .
´
SCALE 1:2 ,0 00
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
R-1 (Residential District)
7158-20151640
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7040-2013
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan
______________________________________________
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official
Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "A" & "C" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7040-2013."
2.Schedule "A", Section 10.2, Albion Area Plan “Schedule 1” is hereby amended for those
parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 10 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 809 Except Part Subdivided
By Plan 43223 and Plan 43601
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No.871, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby redesignated to Low/Medium Density Residential,
Conservation, and Park.
3.Schedule “C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 10 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 809 Except Part Subdivided
By Plan 43223 and Plan 43601
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 872, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation.
4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME the 24th day of November, 2015.
READ A SECOND TIME the 24th day of November, 2015.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the 8th day of December, 2015..
903.1
READ A THIRD TIME the day of , 20 .
RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of , 20 .
_____________________________________ _____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
242502429611219
241522417724212241332426311265
112 AV E .112 AV E .243 ST.112 AV E .
28
P 432 23
B
P 176 13
RP 130 33
P 809
Rem 11
P 176 13 6 26
Rem 1 0
29
45
32
A
30
P 436 01
1P 345 2
Rem 1
31
N 1/2 of 4
Rem 1
NWP5 589
P 809
18
P 176 13
P 432 23
S 15 0' of 1
27
P 681 66
´
Bylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
Institutional and Low Density Residential
Low/Medium Density ResidentialConservation Park
7040-2013871
1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING
242502429611219
241522417724212241332426311265
112 AV E .112 AV E .243 ST.112 AV E .
28
P 432 23
B
P 176 13
RP 130 33
P 809
Rem 11
P 176 13 6 26
Rem 1 0
29
45
32
A
30
P 436 01
1P 345 2
Rem 1
31
N 1/2 of 4
Rem 1
NWP5 589
P 809
18
P 176 13
P 432 23
S 15 0' of 1
27
P 681 66
´
Bylaw No. Map No.
Purpose:To Add To Conservation on Schedule C
7040-2013872
1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7041-2013
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7041-2013."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 10 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 809 Except Part Subdivided
By Plan 43223 and Plan 43601
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1600 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium
Density) Residential) and P-1 (Park and School).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 14th day of January, 2014.
READ a second time the 24th day of November, 2015.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 8th day of December, 2015.
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
903.2
242502429611219
241522417724212241332426311265
112 AV E .112 AV E .243 ST.112 AV E .
28
P 432 23
B
P 176 13
RP 130 33
P 809
Rem 11
P 176 13 6 26
Rem 1 0
29
45
32
A
30
P 436 01
1P 345 2
Rem 1
31
N 1/2 of 4
Rem 1
NWP5 589
P 809
18
P 176 13
P 432 23
S 15 0' of 1
27
P 681 66
´
SCALE 1:2 ,5 00
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
RS-1b (One Family U rban (Medium Den sity) Residential)P-1 (Park and School)
7041-20131600
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 8, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2014-012-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Final Reading
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7067-2014
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7065-2014
24263 and 24295 112 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7067-2014 and Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7065-2014
have been considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently were granted third
reading. The applicant has requested that final reading be granted for the subject properties,
located at 24263 and 24295 112 Avenue (see Appendix A). The purpose of the rezoning is to
permit subdivision into 12 lots not less than 371.3m² (3,997ft²) (see Appendix B).
Council granted first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7065-2014 on March 25, 2014. Council
granted first and second reading for Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7067-2014 and
second reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7065-2014 on October 14, 2014. This application
was presented at Public Hearing on November 18, 2014, and Council granted third reading on
November 25, 2014. Council granted a first extension to this application on November 24, 2015.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7067-2014 be adopted; and
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7065-2014 be adopted.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on November 18, 2014. On
November 25, 2014, Council granted third reading to Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No.
7067 - 2014 (see Appendix C) and Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7065 - 2014 (see Appendix D) with the
stipulation that the following conditions be addressed:
i.Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of
the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;
ii.Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan,
Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan and Schedule “C”;
iii.Park dedication as required, including construction of an equestrian trail;
iv. A letter assuring that removal of all debris and garbage from park land has occurred;
v.Consolidation of the subject properties;
vi. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the geotechnical report, which addresses the
suitability of the subject properties for the proposed development;
vii. Removal of existing buildings; and
904
- 2 -
viii. In addition to the Site Profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional
Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the
subject properties. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the
subject property is not a contaminated site.
The following applies to the above:
i. A Rezoning Servicing Agreement and security deposit have been received, with a Letter of
Undertaking to ensure registration at the Land Titles Office;
ii. Official Community Plan Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan, Schedule 1: Albion
Area Plan and Schedule “C” will be amended with final approval of these bylaws;
iii. A Park dedication plan has been approved by the Approving Officer, with a Letter of
Undertaking to ensure registration at the Land Titles Office. A security for the construction
of the equestrian trail has been received;
iv. A letter assuring removal of all debris and garbage from park land has been received;
v. The subject properties will be consolidated in the same plan as the subdivision plan;
vi. A Restrictive Covenant for the geotechnical report has been received, with a Letter of
Undertaking to ensure registration at the Land Titles Office;
vii. A $30,000.00 security has been taken to ensure the existing buildings will be removed;
and
viii. A disclosure statement by a Professional Engineer advising that there is no evidence of
underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property has been received.
CONCLUSION:
As the applicant has met Council’s conditions, it is recommended that final reading be given to
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7067-2014 and Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7065-
2014.
“Original signed by Michelle Baski”________________
Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT, MA
Planner 1
“Original signed by Chuck Goddard”_________for_______
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”_____________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Subdivision Plan
Appendix C – OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7067-2014
Appendix D – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7065-2014
City of PittMeadows
District ofLangley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Apr 22, 2014 2014-012-SD BY: JV
CORPORATION OFTHE DISTRICT OFMAPLE RIDGE
P LA N NIN G DE P A R T M E N T2417724212112822429611291
11235
24395244042421111265
2434124195 pump sta.24255243852425011265
11269
244022440124263242952440311219
11235
11285
1129524240
11225
11275
11289243 ST.113 AVE.244 ST.243 ST.243B ST.244 ST.243B ST.
P 50696
16
Rem 11
P 68166
P 68166
3
5
PARK
7
26P 50696EPP 312771
8
9
2
EP 15693
A
EP 30021EPP 31277P 43601
45
18
3
P 77744
1 3
10
RP 13033
2
P 77744
EPP 3127718
P 809
4
EPP 31277
P 77744
2
A
17
1
EPP 27594
6
19
11
Subject Properties
´
Scale: 1:2,000
24263/95-112 Avenue
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7067 – 2014
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060 – 2014
_______________________________________
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedules "1" & "C" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7067 – 2014”.
2.Schedule "A", Section 10.2, Albion Area Plan “Schedule 1” is hereby amended for those
parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 2 Section 15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 68166
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 878, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby re-designated to Conservation.
3.Schedule “C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 2 Section 15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 68166
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 888 , a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation.
4.Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060 – 2014 is hereby amended
accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME the 14th day of October, 2014.
READ A SECOND TIME the 14th day of October, 2014.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the 18th day of November, 2014.
READ A THIRD TIME the 25th day of November, 2014.
ADOPTED the day of ,20 .
___________________________________ _____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
904.1
2425511235
112 3 5
112 9 5
2440524404244012440724250112 6 9 2440224403244092441424416244152424011219
24341244082441124177112 2 5 24402244052429624385112 7 5
24413244152421111265
11282
112 6 5
112 8 5
112 8 9
112 9 7
113 0 5
24395244062440924407244142426311291
24406244102441311340
24195 pump sta.2421224295112 9 9
2436424403244102441124412243 ST.11 2 AV E .
11 2 A AV E .243 ST.243B ST.244 ST.11 2 B AV E.
11 3 AV E .11 3 AV E .244 ST.243B ST.P 809
10
27
EPP 37 274
29
RP 130 33 1
EP 300 21
EPP 27 594
7
30
2 EPP 31 277
18
EPP 31 277
A
15
P 5069645
18
16
R em 11
P 681 66
2
3
P 777 44 28
22
16
13
P 436 01 EPP 312771
5
PARK
26
EPP 31 277
54
11
53
P 809
A
32
12
15
A
9
24 23
52
14
P 777 44
2 EPP 3127731
19
51
R em 10
P 506 96
17
1
P 681 66
EP 156 93
P 777 44
3
4
3
6EPP 312778
25
20
17
21
EPP 42088
EPP 31383EP 77745
EPP 27594
EPP 31383
EPP 31383
BCP 49216EPP 31383112 AVE.
´
Byla w No. Ma p No. Fro m:
To:
Low/Medium D ens it y Residential
Conse rvation
706 7-20 14878
1:2,5 00
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING
2425511235
112 3 5
112 9 5
2440524404244012440724250112 6 9 2440224403244092441424416244152424011219
24341244082441124177112 2 5 24402244052429624385112 7 5
24413244152421111265
11282
112 6 5
112 8 5
112 8 9
112 9 7
113 0 5
24395244062440924407244142426311291
24406244102441311340
24195 pump sta.2421224295112 9 9
2436424403244102441124412243 ST.11 2 AV E .
11 2 A AV E .243 ST.243B ST.244 ST.11 2 B AV E.
11 3 AV E .11 3 AV E .244 ST.243B ST.P 809
10
27
EPP 37 274
29
RP 130 33 1
EP 300 21
EPP 27 594
7
30
2 EPP 31 277
18
EPP 31 277
A
15
P 5069645
18
16
R em 11
P 681 66
2
3
P 777 44 28
22
16
13
P 436 01 EPP 312771
5
PARK
26
EPP 31 277
54
11
53
P 809
A
32
12
15
A
9
24 23
52
14
P 777 44
2 EPP 3127731
19
51
R em 10
P 506 96
17
1
P 681 66
EP 156 93
P 777 44
3
4
3
6EPP 312778
25
20
17
21
EPP 42088
EPP 31383EP 77745
EPP 27594
EPP 31383
EPP 31383
BCP 49216EPP 31383112 AVE.
´
Byla w No. Ma p No.
Purpose:To Add to Con serva tion on Schedule C
706 7-20 14888
1:2,5 00
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7065 – 2014
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7065 – 2014."
2.Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 Section 15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 68166
Lot 2 Section 15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 68166
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1612 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban
(Medium Density) Residential).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 25th day of March, 2014.
READ a second time the 14th day of October, 2014.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 18th day of November, 2014.
READ a third time the 25th day of November, 2014.
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX D
904.2
241772425011 28 2
11 29 1
11 2 3 5
24395244042429611 2 6 5
243412438511 26 5
11 2 6 9
24402244012421224263242952440311 21 9
11 23 5
11 2 8 5
11 2 9 524240
11 2 2 5
11 2 7 5
11 2 8 9
24405243 ST.244 ST.243 ST.243B ST.244 ST.243B ST.P 50696
16
P 68 16 6
P 68 16 6
5
PA RK
7
27
26P 5069645 EPP 312771
8
9
2
A EPP 3127718
A
P 77 74 4
1 3
10
R em 11
EP 15 69 3
2
P 77 74 4
EP 30 02 1EPP 3127718
P 80 9
4
EP P 3 1 27 7
P 77 74 4
2
P 43 60 1
17
1
EP P 2 7 59 4
6
19EP P 3 1 27 7
11
EP 7 7745
EPP 27594EPP 31383EPP 3138311 2 AVE .
´
SCALE 1:2 ,00 0
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Ma p No. Fro m:
To:
RS-2 (One Fa mily Suburban Residential)
RS-1 b (One Fa mily Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
706 5-20 141612
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 8, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2015-201-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Final Reading:
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7163-2015
22830 Nelson Court
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7163-2015 has been considered by Council and at Public
Hearing and subsequently was granted Third Reading. The applicant has requested that Final
Reading be granted. The purpose of the rezoning is to permit a future subdivision 11 lots.
Council granted first reading for Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7163-2015 on September
29, 2015 and second reading on October 27, 2015. This application was presented at Public
Hearing on November 17, 2015 and Council granted third reading on November 24, 2015.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7163-2015 be adopted.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on November 17, 2015. On
November 24, 2015 Council granted Third Reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7163-
2015. There are no conditions required for approval of Final Reading.
CONCLUSION:
As the applicant has met Council’s conditions, it is recommended that Final Reading be given to
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7163-2015.
“Original signed by Ann Edwards”_________________
Prepared by: Ann Edwards, CPT
Senior Planning Technician
“Original signed by Chuck Goddard” __for________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”____________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7163-2015
Appendix D – Subdivision Plan 905
DATE: Aug 28, 2015
FILE: 2015-201-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,500
22830 NELSON COURTLegend
!(Ponds
\\Wetlands
GPS Creek Centrelines
Streams & Rivers (Topographic)
Feature Type
Indefinite Creek Centreline
Ditch Centreline
River Centreline
Rivers & Lakes (Topographic)
Feature Type
Lake/Reservoir
APPENDIX A
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Aug 28, 2015
FILE: 2015-201-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
City of Maple Ridge´
Scale: 1:2,500
22830 NELSON COURT
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7163-2015
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7163-2015."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot A Section 29 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP27906 Except
Plans EPP39985 EPP32166 and EPP52568
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1642 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-2 (Urban Residential District).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 29th day of September, 2015.
READ a second time the 27th day of October, 2015.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of November, 2015.
READ a third time the 24th day of November, 2015.
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
13612
22816228221358113497
13525
13550
13556
1353613573
22956 22975135822299013572
13493 1354613500
1346613530 229301 3 5 6 3
1 3 5 3 1
1 3 5 1 1
1 3 5 0 31358522976
13475229722299613601
22808135891348713575 13588228701
3
4
6
21358022902
2296013603
22828228361359313501
13517 13542229522296613568
13604
13613
13469
13533
135601358213566
13570 22910229621 3 5 3 7
1 3 4 8 5
1 3 5 2 5 135902298213608
22830 1358513483
13541 1358613474
1348622918 1 3 5 4 5
1 3 5 1 9
229691346522981135782
2
8
5
013576
1 3 5 5 7
13569
1 3 4 9 5
229781
3
4
6
8
1 3 5 6 2
1 3 5 5 62280213602
228362284013477
2284613509
1346113490
13480 2296613579136 AVE.227B ST.NEL
SON PEAK
DR.
N E L S O N C R T .229 LOOP1 BCP 47305EPP 39 985
EPP 32166
45
10
17
32
46 47
48
2019
77
62
24
28
72
2 16 17
Rem A
42
1615
12
31
30
51
17
19 20
B C P 2 7 8 8 5
12
29
4
1
4
43 E P P 5 2 5 6 8
EPP 39 985
37
14
B C P 2 7 8 8 5
26
75
65
59
3
PARK
3 6
40
PARK
44
3938
21 EPP 3216629
BCP 48 906
35
63
BCP 51 504
27
9
EPP 27 906
1
EPP 5256841
8
11
7
26
50
18
36
61
PARK
22
21
11
73
9
9
PARK
79
25
27
28
78
52
E P P 3 2 1 6 6
23BCP 4930360
B C P 49 303102
PARK
45
E P P 32 166
EPP 5256815
14
25
74
5
EPP 3216613
33
22
23
24
49
53
34
18
16
13
64
BCP 49 303
58EPP 37737EPP 52782EPP 35219
E
P
P 3
3
3
6
6
B
C
P 4
93
0
5BCP 47312EPP 33367EPP 33367
EPP 53056EPP 53211EPP 34960BCP 47311BCP 47309EPP 53057EPP 52781BCP 47311EPP 27908EPP 35484BC P 27887BCP 47313EPP 38973
BCP 48909
EPP 39564
E P P 5 2 7 8 2 EPP 35197EPP 34961
B
CP
5
1
5
0
6
BCP 51506
B C P 4 9 3 0 6
136 AVE.
´
SCALE 1:2 ,5 00
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
R-1 (Residential District)
R-2 (Urban Residential District)
7163-20151642
APPENDIX D
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
LOCAL AREA SERVICE
BYLAW NO. 7166 – 2015
A Bylaw to authorize a municipal service to maintain enhanced landscape areas; to define the benefitting
lands; and to establish that the cost of the municipal service shall be borne by the owners of real property
within such defined area.
WHEREAS, Council has been petitioned to provide a municipal service pursuant to Division 5, Section 210
of the Community Charter S.B.C. 2003, c.26 (the “Community Charter”);
AND WHEREAS the Corporate Officer has certified that the petition received for the municipal services does
constitute a sufficient and valid petition;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to proceed with the works;
AND WHEREAS the “Maple Ridge Local Area Service Policy”, as amended, provides that the cost of
providing a municipal service shall be recoverable from each of the existing parcels of land and all future
lots created by subdivision of the parcels, specifically:
Lot 5 District Lot 241 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 1750 Except the East 100 Feet,
Plans 17056, 26346, and EPP50931
that will benefit from the service.
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as “West Ridge Local Area Service Bylaw No. 7166-2015”.
2.The contents of Schedules “A”, “B” and “C” attached hereto are hereby declared to be made an integral
part of this Bylaw.
3.The Local Area Service of the City for the benefit of which the enhanced landscape areas are to be
maintained as a municipal service are defined as the hatched areas on the attached Schedule “A”.
4.The recommended procedures and frequencies for maintenance and Annual Charges are described on
the attached Schedule “B”.
5.The Enhanced Landscape Area planting and design plans “Rain Garden Planting Details” by Letts
Environmental Ltd., dated March 2014; and “Roadworks 207A Street” by Aplin & Martin Consultants
Ltd., dated March 2015 are attached as Schedule “C”
6.The bylaw shall take effect as of the date of adoption hereof.
READ a first time the 24th day of November, 2015.
READ a second time the 24th day of November, 2015.
READ a third time the 24th day of November, 2015.
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 906
207A ST.123 AVE.
87
543
2
96
1
20
19
18
171615
1413121110
21
PARK PARK
PARK
PARK
PARK
PARK
´
SCALE 1:2,695
MAPLE RIDGE LOCAL AREA SERVICE BYLAWBylaw No.7166-2015
Enhanced Landscape Areas
Original Lot Boundary
Schedule "A"
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
LOCAL AREA SERVICE
BYLAW NO. 7166 - 2015
SCHEDULE “B”
Class of Work:
The establishment, maintenance and replacement of enhanced road bioswales and two rain gardens
indicated by bold outline on Schedule “A” are to be maintained as per the recommended procedures
and frequencies for maintenance “Level 3 – Moderate” of the BC Landscape Standard. (BC Society
of Landscape Architects and BC Landscape & Nursery Association).
Annual Charge:
The Annual Charge is based on a per lot basis for each of the 21 lots created by the subdivision of:
Lot 5 District Lot 241 Group 1 New Westminster Distrcit Plan 1750 Except the East 100 Feet, Plans
17056, 26346, and EPP50931
of $80.20 starting in 2018.
The charges established under this Bylaw shall be specifically charged against the parcels
benefitting from the work, payable by a per lot basis levied year by year.
The Annual Charge Adjustment:
The annual charge will be reviewed each year by the Operations Department, and adjusted
accordingly to reflect any change in maintenance requirements or costs, and to reflect any increase
in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Vancouver, BC for the immediately preceding year commencing
with 2015, as provided by Statistics Canada.
Schedule "C" (1)
Schedule "C" (2)
City of Maple Ridge
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
MINUTES
November 16, 2015
1:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
PRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Mayor N. Read F. Quinn, General Chief Administrative Officer/General
Councillor C. Bell Manager Public Works and Development Services
Councillor K. Duncan K. Swift, General Manager of Community Development,
Councillor B. Masse Parks and Recreation Services
Councillor G. Robson P. Gill, General Manager Corporate and Financial Services
Councillor T. Shymkiw C. Carter, Director of Planning
Councillor C. Speirs C. Marlo, Manager of Legislative Services
Other Staff as Required
C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental
Services
A. Kopystynski, Planner 2
M. Baski, Planner 1
D. Denton, Property and Risk Manager
M. Pym, Environmental Technician
1.DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS
1.1 My Health, My Community
•Delaram Farshad, Community Health Specialist – Maple Ridge & Pitt
Meadows, Healthy Living/Healthier Communities
•Dr. Shovita Padhi, Medical Health Officer, Fraser Health
Ms. Farshad presented on behalf of Dr. Padhi. She gave a power point
presentation that provided an overview of the My Health, My Community
survey results.
2.PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council
Agenda:
1100
Committee of the Whole Minutes
November 16, 2015
Page 2 of 9
1101 2015-279-RZ, 22833 122 Avenue, RS-1 to R-3
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7182-2015 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) for subdivision into
three single family lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide
further information as described on Schedule B of the Development
Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services reviewed the
recommendation in the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
Note: Councillor Duncan excused herself from discussion of Item 1102 at 1:33 p.m.
as her property is within a block of the application.
1102 2015-297-RZ, 11305 233 Street, 11383 and 11438 232 Street, 11428,
23020, 23025, 23054, 23060, 23075, 23089 and 23095 Lougheed
Highway, RS-3 to R-2, RM-1 and C-1
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7183-2015 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to R-2 (Urban Residential District), RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
and C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) be given first reading and that the
applicant provide a voluntary community amenity contribution and further
information as described on Schedules A, B, C, D, F and G of the Development
Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
A. Kopystynski gave a Power Point presentation providing the following
information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Neighbourhood Context
• Official Community Plan Context
• Site Characteristics
• Development Proposal
• Considerations
• Proposal
• Recommendation in staff report
Committee of the Whole Minutes
November 16, 2015
Page 3 of 9
Ryan Lucy, Morningstar Homes; Maginnis Cocivera, Polygon Homes
Mr. Lucy presented further information on the single-family residential
component of the development. Mr. Cocivera presented details of the multi-
family component of the development and the benefits to be realized from the
development to Maple Ridge.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
Councillor Robson - OPPOSED
Note: Councillor Duncan returned to the meeting at 1:58 p.m.
1103 2014-104-RZ, 23050 136 Avenue, R-1 and R-3 to R-2
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7167-2015 to designate land
adjacent to proposed Lot 8 from Eco Clusters to Conservation be given first
and second hearings and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple
Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7124-2014 to rezone from R-1 (Residential
District) and R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) to R-2 (Urban
Residential District) to permit a future subdivision of 12 lots be given second
reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services reviewed the
recommendation in the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
1104 2015-283-RZ, 14160 and 14170 256 Street, Site Specific Text Amendment
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7177-2015 to permit the cleaning of low hazard
transformers and the storage and minor processing of hydrocarbons be given
first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
Committee of the Whole Minutes
November 16, 2015
Page 4 of 9
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a Power Point
presentation providing the following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Neighbourhood Context
• Official Community Plan Context
• Site Characteristics
• Development Proposal
• Recommendation in staff report
Glen Froese, CHP Architects
Mr. Froese provided details of the process to clean the transformers and
dispose of the effluent.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be deferred to an appropriate meeting to receive
information on the ownership of the business, potential risk to the community,
transferability of the business licence and the definition of M5 zoning.
Note: Councillor Speirs left the meeting at 2:29 p.m.
1105 2012-013-RZ, 24152 112 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-1b and P-1, Update Report
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7040-2013 to designate from Institutional
and Low Density Residential to Low/Medium Density Residential and Park
and to adjust the conservation area be given first and second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.
7041-2013 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One
Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) and P-1 (Park and School) to
allow for future subdivision into approximately 25 lots and a neighbourhood
park using the Density Bonus option be given second reading as amended
and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
M. Baski, Planner reviewed the recommendation in the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
Committee of the Whole Minutes
November 16, 2015
Page 5 of 9
1106 2013-041-SD, 20738 123 Avenue, Local Area Service
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that West Ridge Local
Area Service Bylaw No. 7166-2015 to allow for enhanced landscape
maintenance of road bioswales and two rain gardens be given first, second
and third readings.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services reviewed the
recommendation in the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
1107 2012-119-RZ, 24108 104 Avenue and 10336 240A Street, First One Year
Extension
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that a first one year
extension be granted for Application 2012-119-RZ to permit 97 townhouse
units under the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services reviewed the
recommendation in the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
1108 2014-012-RZ, 24263 112 Avenue and 24295 112 Avenue, First One Year
Extension
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that a first one year
extension be granted for Application 2014-012-RZ to allow for future
subdivision of approximately 12 single family lots.
M. Baski, Planner reviewed the recommendations in the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
Committee of the Whole Minutes
November 16, 2015
Page 6 of 9
1109 2014-024-RZ, 24990 110 Avenue, First One Year Extension
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that a first one year
extension be granted for Application 2014-024-RZ to permit future
subdivision into 5 single family lots under the RS-1b (One Family Urban
[Medium Density] Residential) zone.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services reviewed the
recommendations in the staff report.
Note: Councillor Duncan left the meeting at 2:46 p.m.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
1110 2011-089-DP, 22309, 22319 and 22331 St. Anne Avenue
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2011-089-DP to govern form and
character of a proposed apartment building and site landscaping.
A. Kopystynski, Planner, reviewed the recommendation in the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
Note: Councillor Duncan returned to the meeting at 2:50 p.m.
1111 2015-287-DP, 22309, 22319 and 22331 St. Anne Avenue
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2015-287-DP to govern the
conservation works for the Morse/Turnock Residence.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
Committee of the Whole Minutes
November 16, 2015
Page 7 of 9
1112 2015-151-SP, 9842 264 Street, Soil Deposit Permit
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that Application 2015-
151-SP for a fill permit to improve agricultural utilization of the property be
approved and be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission.
The Manager of Development and Environmental Services gave a Power Point
presentation providing the following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Development Proposal
• Site Characteristics
• Recommendation in staff report
The Environmental Technician provided information on the City’s procedures
for oversight of soil deposit permits.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
1113 Ridge Brewing Company Ltd. Liquor License Amendment Application –
Brewery Lounge Endorsement
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that the application by
Ridge Brewing Company Ltd. for a brewery lounge endorsement not be
supported and that a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor Control
and Licensing Branch.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
3. FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERVICES (including Fire and Police)
1131 Proposed Cellular Tower at Golden Ears Park
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that satisfactory
completion of the public consultation process by Rogers Communications Inc.
be acknowledged and that there were no objections to the proposed cellular
communications tower for Golden Ears Park.
Committee of the Whole Minutes
November 16, 2015
Page 8 of 9
The Property and Risk Manager provided an overview of the report.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
1132 Disbursements for the month ended October 31, 2015
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 recommending that the disbursements
for the month ended October 31, 2015 be received for information.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
1133 2015 Council Expenses
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 providing on update on Council
expenses to the end of October for 2015.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
1134 Adjustments to 2015 Collector’s Rolls
Staff report dated November 16, 2015 submitting information on changes to
the 2015 Collector’s Roll through the issuance of Supplementary Rolls 7 and
8.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of November 24,
2015.
4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERVICES – Nil
5. CORRESPONDENCE – Nil
Committee of the Whole Minutes
November 16, 2015
Page 9 of 9
6. OTHER ISSUES – Nil
7. ADJOURNMENT – 3:07 p.m.
8. COMMUNITY FORUM
Allen Lees
Mr. Lees sought clarification of comments at Workshop concerning protection
of trees on Shady Lane. He asked whether the heritage trees and the City
trees on Shady Lane are protected. The Manager of Development and
Environmental Services explained that the trees are protected.
Ms. Lees also sought clarification of a comment that a section of the bylaw
would be challengeable in court. He indicated that his research has not
shown any court challenges.
___________________________________
T. Shymkiw, Acting Mayor
Presiding Member of the Committee
City of Maple Ridge
Note: If required, there will be a 15-minute break at 3:00 p.m.
Chair: Acting Mayor
1.DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS – (10 minutes each)
1:00 p.m.
1.1 Maple Ridge Tree Protection Amending Bylaw
•Tom Kerr
1.2 Social Services Research Project
•Scott Graham, Associate Executive Director, Manager of Research,
Planning and Consulting, SPARC BC (Social Planning and Research
Council of British Columbia)
2.PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council
Agenda:
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
December 7, 2015
1:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting
takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to
Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more
information or clarification before proceeding to Council. The meeting is live
streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge.
Note: Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications may be permitted
to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes.
Committee of the Whole Agenda
December 7, 2015
Page 2 of 5
1101 2015-309-RZ, 21773, 21787 and 21795 Lougheed Highway, RS-1 to C-2
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7180-2015 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit construction of a two-
storey commercial building be given first reading and that the applicant
provide further information as described on Schedules A, C and D of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
1102 2012-004-RZ, 23791 112 Avenue, RS-3 to R-1
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7159-2015 to designate from
Conservation to Urban Residential be given first and second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.
7111-2014 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1
(Residential District) to permit a future subdivision of approximately 16 lots be
given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
1103 2015-334-RZ, Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment, Use of Shipping Containers
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7184-2015 to direct the use of shipping containers be
given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
1104 2015-361-RZ, Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment, 1 km Rule for Wine Stores in
Grocery Stores
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7190-2015 to prohibit the sale of liquor in any grocery
store located within one kilometer of a licensed retail store or government
liquor store be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing.
1105 Maple Ridge Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge Tree
Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 be given first, second and
third readings, that Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw
No. 7191-2015 be given first, second and third readings and that Maple
Ridge Development Application Fee Amending Bylaw No. 7192-2015 be given
first, second and third readings.
Committee of the Whole Agenda
December 7, 2015
Page 3 of 5
1106 2011-130-RZ, 12240 228 Street, First One Year Extension
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that a first one year
extension be granted for Application 2011-130-RZ to rezone to the R-3
(Special Amenity Residential District) zone to permit a future subdivision into
approximately 4 single family lots not less than 292 m2 in area.
1107 2013-039-RZ, 20208 McIvor Avenue, First One Year Extension
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that a first one year
extension be granted for Application 2013-039-RZ to permit future
subdivision into 13 single family residential lots under the RS-1b (One Family
Urban [Medium Density] zone.
1108 2012-115-RZ, 12018, 12038 Edge Street and 22554, 22566 Brown Avenue,
Final One Year Extension
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that a final one year
extension be granted for Application 2012-115-RZ to permit a three phased
mixed use development consisting of 240 apartment units in three towers,
commercial floor area, underground parking and above ground structured
parking subject to the CD-1-13 (Comprehensive Development) zone,
1109 2014-065-DP, 22355 McIntosh Avenue, Multi-Family Development Permit
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2014-065-DP to permit renovation of a
podium style three storey wood frame apartment with 21 one bedroom units
over a first storey concrete building.
1110 2015-300-DP, 25467 Bosonworth Avenue
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2015-300-DP in support of a
development plan for a four (4) lot subdivision under RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) zoning.
Committee of the Whole Agenda
December 7, 2015
Page 4 of 5
1111 2014-086-SD, 5% Money in Lieu of Parkland Dedication
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that the owner of the
subject property pay an amount that is not less than $47,650.00.
1112 Latecomer Policy
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that the Latecomer
Policy be adopted.
1113 Local Area Service – Hampton Street Extension Bylaw No. 7178-2015
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that Maple Ridge
Hampton Street Extension Bylaw No. 7178-2015 to establish road, storm
sewer, sanitary sewer and water services on the 20100 Block of Hampton
Street be given first, second and third readings.
3.FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERVICES (including Fire and Police)
1131
4.COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERVICES
1151 Festivals and Special Events Review Process
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that the Festival and
Special Event review process be approved.
1152 Subsidized Ice Allocation – Minor Sports
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 providing information on subsidized ice
allocation available to minor sport groups in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows.
1153 Leisure Centre Pool Renovations Contract Award
Staff report dated December 7, 2015 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and execute Construction Contract ITT-PL15-67
with Mierau Contractors Limited for construction of the Maple Ridge Leisure
Centre Pool, mechanical and filtration system and that a contingency of 10%
for the contract be established.
Committee of the Whole Agenda
December 7, 2015
Page 5 of 5
5.CORRESPONDENCE
1171
6.OTHER ISSUES
1181
7.ADJOURNMENT
8.COMMUNITY FORUM
Checked by:________________
Date: ________________
COMMUNITY FORUM
The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to ask questions of
Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing
bylaws that have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the
podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the
individual members of Council. The total time for this Forum is limited to 15
minutes.
If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a
response will be given.
Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings and
delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or
via email and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings.
Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future
of this community.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk’s Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca
Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2015-309-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7180-2015
21773, 21787 and 21795 Lougheed Highway
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject properties, located at 21773, 21787 and
21795 Lougheed Highway, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to C-2 (Community
Commercial) to permit construction of a two-storey commercial building. To proceed further with this
application additional information is required as outlined below. For this application to proceed a
number of variances to the C-2 zone will likely be required.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the
development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether
consultation is required with specifically:
i.The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the
case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
ii.The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iii.The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iv.First Nations;
v.School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and
vi.The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this
matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s
website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and;
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7180-2015 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C and D of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the information required for a
Subdivision application for the lot consolidation.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Bissky Architecture and Urban Design Inc.
1101
- 2 -
Owner: Pagliacci Holdings Ltd.
Legal Descriptions: Parcel “B” (Explanitory Plan 10251) Lot 8 District Lot
247 Group 1 New Westminster Plan 1007
Lot 1 & 2 District Lot 247 Group 1 New Westminster
District Plan 12044
OCP:
Existing: Commercial and Urban Residential
Proposed: Commercial
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: C-2 (Community Commercial)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
South: Use: Commercial and Residential
Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial) and RS-1 (One Family
Urban Residential)
Designation: Commercial and Urban Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
West: Use: Commercial
Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial)
Designation: Commercial
Existing Use of Property: Vacant and Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Commercial
Site Area: 0.53 Ha (1.3 acres)
Access: Lougheed Highway
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
b)Site Characteristics:
The subject properties are located on the north side of Lougheed Highway, east of the Quality Inn
and Firefly Fine Wines and Ales businesses (see Appendix A and B). The properties located at 21773
and 21795 Lougheed Highway are currently vacant, while the property located at 21787 Lougheed
Highway has an existing house that will require removal as a condition of final reading. The subject
properties are flat with low-lying vegetation on the western lot, with some hedges and trees
surrounding the existing house.
c)Project Description:
This application proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
to C-2 (Community Commercial) (see Appendix C) to permit the construction of a two-storey
commercial building with a total gross floor area of approximately 2,787 m² (30,000 ft²) (see
Appendix D).
- 3 -
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will
need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for
further development permits.
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The properties located at 21773 and 21787 Lougheed Highway are designated Commercial in the
OCP, and the property located at 21795 Lougheed Highway is designated Urban Residential. The two
parcels currently designated commercial fall under the General Commercial Category. General
Commercial lands are intended to provide a mixture of traditional highway commercial and other
retail development. The policies do not envision significant office use in this designation and should
be located within the Town Centre.
The proposed C-2 (Community Commercial) zoning does not comply with the Urban Residential land
use designation, however, the OCP amendment is supportable because this amendment permits a
logical assembly of land into one development. This property, given its residential designation; small
size and Lougheed Highway location, would likely remain undeveloped. Therefore, a future OCP
application is required to re-designate 21795 Lougheed Highway from Urban Residential to
Commercial. A detailed assessment of the proposed OCP amendment will be provided in a future
report to Council.
On September 15, 2015 Council endorsed the Housing Action Plan. This plan contains a number of
action items to protect existing and create new rental housing stock in the City. One key component
is to create new rental units above commercial developments. Currently, this practice is being
negotiated on an individual basis during the development process. To this end staff has sought the
inclusion of rental units on the second floor of the current proposal. This housing option has been
resisted by the applicant who hopes to have the building’s second storey occupied by professional
offices. Staff will be returning to Council in the new year with a follow-up implementation report on
ways to support the Housing Action Plan.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit the construction of a commercial building.
Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance
Permit application. The plan as submitted required a variance to the size of the second floor for
office use. Given the residential land use on the northern boundary of the property, past practice
has been not to support height variances along this section of Lougheed Highway. The only
exception has been a second storey used as a residential rental use. Any variance requested will be
the subject of a future report to Council.
Council has been seeking the inclusion of rental apartment units, secured through a Housing
Agreement, above all recent commercial development proposal in an effort to boost the City’s rental
stock. The applicant is proposing a second storey of office uses rather than rental apartments.
Council’s position has been raised with the applicant but they have decided not to introduce a rental
- 4 -
housing component to the project. Council can insist on such a use if desired and this option is
outlined in the alternative section of this report.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.5 of the OCP, a Commercial Development Permit application is required to
address the current proposal’s compatibility with adjacent development, and to enhance the unique
character of the community. The initial design shown attached does not conform to all of the DP
conditions and thus may change prior to second reading of this zoning amendment bylaw.
Advisory Design Panel:
A Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to
second reading.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is required for this application, as an OCP amendment is
required. Prior to second reading the applicant is required to host a Development Information
Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20. It can be expected that this proposal will raise some
interest from the neighbouring single family dwellings to the north and east of the site. Efforts
should be made by the applicant to buffer the development from negatively impacting these
neighbours through appropriate, lighting, fenestration and landscaping.
e)Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a)Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
c)Licences, Permits and Bylaws;
d)Fire Department;
e)School District;
f)Utility Companies;
g)Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; and
h)Canada Post.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between first and second reading.
f)Early and Ongoing Consultation:
In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an OCP amendment, it
is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed
OCP amendments on the City’s website, together with an invitation to the public to comment.
- 5 -
g)Alternatives:
Council could elect not to support this application in its current form and insist that rental
apartments be provided above the ground floor commercial units. This has been Council’s position
taken in the past on a number of other commercial proposals in Albion, Silver Valley and West Maple
Ridge.
Council could also insist on another option where a third storey is provided containing rental
apartments. This would, however, require the need for a variance for building height from 7.5 m
(24.5 ft.) to approximately 11 m (36 ft.) which may negatively impact neighbours.
If Council is concerned about the request to have second storey office uses located outside of the
Town Centre, which has been historically the case, it is suggested that the impact be limited by
insisting the C-2 zone’s restriction that: “the second storey floor area shall not exceed 50% in area
of the first storey” be maintained.
h)Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended:
1.An OCP Application (Schedule A);
2.A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C);
3.A complete Development Permit Application (Schedule D); and
4.A Subdivision Application.
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is not in compliance with the policies of the OCP, however, justification
has been provided to support an OCP amendment to re-designate 21795 Lougheed Highway from
Urban Residential to Commercial. Council could insist, at this stage, that rental apartments occupy
the proposed second storey of the project.
It is recommended that Council grant first reading, subject to additional information being provided
and assessed prior to second reading.
- 6 -
The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations
governing commercial development permits or variances. Any development scheme provided is
strictly preliminary and must be approved by the City.
“Original signed by Adam Rieu”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adam Rieu
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Chuck Goddard” for
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7180-2015
Appendix D – Site Plan
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Oct 7, 2015
2015-309-RZ
BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
218 St´
Scale: 1:1,500
21773/21787/21795 Lougheed Hwy
2011 Image
APPENDIX A
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Oct 7, 2015
2015-309-RZ
BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
218 StCity of Maple Ridge´
Scale: 1:1,500
21773/21787/21795 Lougheed Hwy
2011 Image
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7180-2015
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7180-2015."
2.Those parcel (s) or tract (s) of land and premises known and described as:
Parcel “B” (Explanatory Plan 10251) Lot 8 District Lot 247 Group 1 New Westminster
District Plan 1007
Lot 1 District Lot 247 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 12044
Lot 2 District Lot 247 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 12044
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1647 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to C-2 (Community Commercial).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of
, 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
21668216682168421692217362175911884
217742178521756217891175021800 2179511737
11748
11728
1175421807 218162182821868218512189611729216852171021735
2176911741
1171221784 21806218182181711948
2183811928218801193521892216742170121711217242172311889
11729 2179511772 2190111709
1174921891219112165521698217142174421784217712177921801218001182921802
1170821848 11931
11921
21827218502166721710217282173311895
217552176411753
11738
1176221787 2183011863
1187321808
117472184221816 21815218071176221810 218192185421880/9821650216562168021715/1921732217461172621796 11851 2180121808218142180311941
2182621825119221192321633216622167521691217202173321731217342174721742217502177311713
11706 2179611841
11717
11767
11721 11720
11738 218372184021888219101171921920216562166521671216942171121707217412176811888
11707 217992180811
8
8
3
11757 1193621864218762187111739
11759218 ST.CARR ST.LAURIE AVE.
WI
C
K
L
O
W
W
A
Y
HOWISON AVE.HALL ST.DONOVAN AVE.218 ST.DOVER ST.LOUGHEED HWY.
DOVER RD.
198
238
P 35292
"B"
226
58
228 229
67
294
143P 31180
276
234
P 31180
144
186 P 33311106
13
8
B
114
147 P 44518
SL24
SL23
145
3
70
221 220
201
77 85
3
232
P 36099
241
1
236 237
2 EP 10251117
7
C
109
6
2 SL8BCS 607SL1
146
SL21
SL20
CP
SL16
10
9
225
202
LP 77304
217 215
278
233 P 39905212
A P 8409
123
118
149
115
7
125 126
P 44518
SL12
SL10
SL9
19
CP
SL18
SL15
131
224
219
76
P 35974
2
235
185
P 35292
166
122
P 12386
11
9
119
7
110
SL5
SL4
127
153
112
21
P 2
2
6
5
6
BCS 6071
144
7
6
157
32
P 11112
223
197
6
199
P 8950
P 36099
218
203
2
P 6664
192P 39905279P 38855244
213
296
187
Rem
208
121
P 44518
108
P 131616
111
8
SL19P 70732P 2
1
2
2
9
P 44518
161
134
227
P 61812
P 28917
230 231
216
277
275
295
211
P 12386107
150
P 13161*PP067P 13161
151
SL11
SL7
SL6
SL2
113
SL17
P 12785P 12785
130
143
5
142
P 1007
222
P 29839
200
P 28917
NWS 18481
P 36099
78 P 35428214
243
*PP066
P 31180
240
189 P 13876P 44518209
105
12
10
116
124
5
148
152
SL22
CP
128 129
20
156
6
8
71
31
C
Rem
P 6664
319
P 32510
204
*PP075
293
P 12044
188
P 35974B
210
167
120
1
3
4
SL3
18
154
155
7
4
132
RP 84920
RP 74552
RW 44519
RP 30988
EP 36421
RW
4
4
5
1
9
RW 44519
BCP 8450EP 22994LOUGHEED HWY.
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
C-2 (Community Commercial)
7180-20151647
APPENDIX D
- 1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-004-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7159-2015, and
Second Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7111-2014
23791 112 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 23791 112 Avenue, from
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) to permit a future subdivision of
approximately 16 lots. The minimum lot size for the current RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
zone is 0.8 hectares (8,000m²) and the minimum lot size for the proposed R-1 (Residential District)
zone is 371m².
The proposed R-1 (Residential District) zoning complies with the policies of the Official Community
Plan (OCP) for Urban Residential. However, this application requires an amendment to the OCP to
redesignate approximately 3756m² from Conservation to Urban Residential.
Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7111-2014, and considered the early
consultation requirements for the OCP amendment on October 28, 2014. Since then, the bylaw map
has been amended to adjust the zoning boundary to protect a tree within the park dedication.
Pursuant with Council resolution, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution
(CAC) program.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1)That, in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and on-
going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw
No. 7159-2015 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any
further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw;
2)That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7159-2015 be considered in conjunction with
the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
3)That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7159-2015 is consistent
with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
4)That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7159-2015 be given first and second
readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
5)That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7111-2014, be amended as identified in the staff report dated
December 7, 2015 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
1102
- 2 -
6)That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i)Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of
the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;
ii)Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedules "B" and “C”;
iii)Road dedication as required;
iv)Park dedication as required, including removal of all debris and garbage from park land;
v)Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the geotechnical report which addresses the
suitability of the subject property for the proposed development; and
vi)A voluntary citywide Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) be provided in keeping with the
direction given by Council with regard to amenities.
DISCUSSION:
1)Background Context:
Applicant: Aplin & Martin Consultants
Owner: Maple Industries Ltd.
Legal Description: Parcel “G” (Reference Plan 1387) except: portion on Plan LMP38552 of the
South East Quarter Section 16, Township 12, New Westminster District
OCP:
Existing: Urban Residential, Conservation
Proposed: Urban Residential, Conservation
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: R-1 (Residential District)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Park, Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), RS-1b (One Family
Urban (Medium Density) Residential
Designation: Conservation
South: Use: Single Family Residential, Park
Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), CD-1-93 (Amenity
Residential District), RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential, Conservation
East: Use: Single Family Residential and future Fire Hall site
Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential, and
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential, Conservation
- 3 -
West: Use: Park
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Conservation
Existing Use of Property: Rural Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Urban Single Family Residential
Site Area: 5.950 ha. (14.7acres)
Access: 112 Avenue and continuation of 238 Street
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
Companion Applications: 2012-004-SD, 2012-004-DP, 2012-004-VP
2) Background:
This rezoning application was received in January 2012 for a proposed townhouse development to
be zoned RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). In a report to Council for first reading dated February 6,
2012, the Planning Department did not support the development proposal because it conflicted with
the neighbouring single family houses and was not supported by the OCP infill policies. At the
Council meeting of February 14, 2012, Council denied first reading of Zone Amending Bylaw No.
6897-2012. At the Council Workshop meeting of February 20, 2012, Council approved a resolution
to reconsider the application at the next Council meeting. At the Council meeting of February 28,
2012, Council reconsidered the application and deferred Bylaw No. 6897-2012 pending further
analysis of the site.
In 2014 a revised development plan was submitted for single family residential development. The
original bylaw was cancelled, and the new Zone Amending Bylaw No. Bylaw 7111-2014 was
prepared to rezone the developable portion of the property to R-1 (Residential District) for
approximately 16 lots. At the Council meeting of October 28, 2014, Council approved first reading of
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7111-2014.
3) Project Description:
The subject property is located in the Cottonwood area at the northwest corner of 112 Avenue and a
future continuation of 238 Street. The majority of the property is designated Conservation and a
narrow strip of land on the east side of the property, between the top-of-bank for Horseshoe Creek
and the east property line, is designated Urban Residential. North of the property there is a single
row of single family lots on the west side of 238 Street with steep slopes down to Horseshoe Creek in
the rear. This proposed development will continue that pattern south to 112 Avenue. Single family
lots are also located south of 112 Avenue. The lands north and west of the property are dedicated
park land for Conservation purposes. The future Fire Hall/Park property is to be located east of this
property at 23863 112 Avenue.
The subject property is 5.950 ha (14.7acres) in area (Appendices A and B). The applicant is
proposing to rezone the developable portion of the property to R-1 (Residential District) for
approximately 16 lots fronting onto 238 Street. The balance of the property will be dedicated as
Park for the protection of the steep slopes and watercourses. Road dedication is required to
construct 238 Street along the east side of the property as a continuation of the existing street at the
north end, and to connect with Kanaka Way at the south. To achieve this road alignment, additional
road will be dedicated from the City-owned property at 23863 112 Avenue, which is the future
location for Fire Hall #4. 112 Avenue terminates in a cul-de-sac on the south side of the property
and will not be extended further to the west across the Horseshoe Creek ravine due to the steep
- 4 -
slopes. In addition, a 4.5m (14.85ft) wide service corridor will be dedicated to the rear of the lots to
provide access for future maintenance of the municipal services to be located there.
4)Planning Analysis:
i)Official Community Plan:
The subject property is currently designated Urban Residential and Conservation, and the
proposed R-1 (Residential District) zone is consistent with Urban Residential Policies 3-18,
3-19 and 3-21 for Neighbourhood Residential Infill. The development is compatible with
existing single family housing in the surrounding neighbourhood.
An amendment to the OCP is proposed to redesignate approximately 3756m² at the top of
the slope from Conservation to Urban Residential as a result of ground-truthing on the
property. Geotechnical and environmental assessments have established the location of
the top-of-bank and the required setbacks (Appendix C).
ii)Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family
Rural Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) (Appendix D) to permit a future subdivision of
approximately 16 lots (Appendix E).
The minimum lot size for the current RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) zone is 0.8
hectares (8,000m²) and the minimum lot size for the proposed R-1 (Residential District)
zone is 371m².
iii)Off-Street Parking And Loading Bylaw:
As per the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990, two parking spaces will
be provided for each lot, with additional parking available on the driveways. A restrictive
covenant will be registered at the subdivision stage to require the driveway access from
112 Avenue only for Lot 1.
iv)Proposed Variances:
Development Variance Permit application 2012-004-VP has been received for the following
variance:
1.Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 4800-1993: to waive the
requirements for servicing upgrades on the 112 Avenue frontage west of the cul-de-
sac, as the road is not intended to extend further west.
The requested variance will be the subject of a future Council report.
v)Development Permits:
Pursuant to Sections 8.9 and 8.10 of the OCP, Watercourse Protection Development
Permit combined with a Natural Features Development Permit application 2012-104-DP
has been received to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of
watercourse and riparian areas, and to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and
- 5 -
enhancement of the natural environment and for development that is protected from
hazardous conditions. These permits are required for:
all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top of bank of all
watercourses and wetlands;
all areas designated Conservation on Schedule “B” or all areas within 50 metres of
an area designated Conservation on Schedule “B”, or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the
Silver Valley Area Plan;
all lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 %; and
all floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural Features Schedule “C”
vi)Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is not required for this development as fewer than 25
lots are proposed.
vii)Parkland Requirement:
As there are more than two additional lots proposed to be created, the developer will be
required to comply with the park dedication requirements of Section 941 of the Local
Government Act prior to subdivision approval.
For this project, there is sufficient land that is proposed to be dedicated as park on the
subject property and this land will be required to be dedicated as a condition of final
reading.
viii)Citywide Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) program:
On October 19, 2015 Council passed a number of resolutions pertaining to the
establishment of a Citywide CAC program. Options for dealing with in-stream applications
were discussed and staff were directed to include information on the proposed CAC
program in future staff development reports. It is noted that the Resolutions passed at the
Council Workshop can be used as a guide for determining CAC contributions, in the interim
period while the CAC OCP amending bylaw is being considered.
As this application is to be considered by Council since the CAC discussion occurred, staff
have included the following condition in the recommendation section:
vii)That a voluntary citywide Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) be provided in
keeping with the direction given by Council with regard to amenities.
5)Environmental Implications:
The subject property is located in the Cottonwood area at the northwest corner of 112 Avenue and a
future continuation of 238 Street. The majority of the property is comprised of a ravine with steep
slopes over 25%. Several small tributaries run off the slopes and into Horseshoe Creek, which flows
from the north through the property.
The clay slopes in the Cottonwood area are known to have significant slope stability problems, and
evidence of instability has been noted in the area. Both loading and unloading (cutting and filling)
associated with development can cause substantial changes to the stability of these slopes.
Detailed geotechnical and environmental assessments have been provided confirming suitability of
- 6 -
the property for development and to establish the setback requirements for geotechnical and
watercourse/slope protection on this property. Development is limited to the relatively flat bench
along the eastern edge of the property.
A significant tree on the south side of Lot 1 will be protected by a restrictive covenant at the
subdivision stage, and another significant tree behind Lot 14 will be protected by shorten ing the
depth of the lots so the tree is within the Park.
6) Interdepartmental Implications:
i) Engineering Department:
The rezoning (off-site) servicing requirements for this application include the construction of
238 Street to an Urban Collector standard along the east side of the property as a
continuation of the existing street at the north end, and to connect with Kanaka Way at the
south. To achieve this road alignment, additional road will be dedicated from the City-
owned property to the east at 23863 112 Avenue.
Approval of a Variance Permit is required to waive the requirements for servicing upgrades
on the 112 Avenue frontage west of the cul-de-sac, as the road is not intended to extend
further west. The storm and sanitary services will be located within an access corridor to
the rear of the lots.
ii) Parks & Leisure Services Department:
The Parks Department has confirmed that a trail is not required within the proposed park
dedication as there is no opportunity for trail connectivity to the north.
iii) Fire Department:
The Fire Department commented that, given that this property is directly adjacent to the
future Fire Hall #4, it is recommended that the developer conduct a sound attenuation
study to measure the impact of noise generated from the proposed fire hall and tr aining
facility. The use of noise abating construction materials is recommended, and this will be
included as a condition of subdivision approval.
7) School District No. 42 Comments:
Pursuant to Section 881 of the Local Government Act, consultation with School District No. 42
is required at the time of preparing or amending the OCP. A referral was sent to School District
No. 42 on April 2, 2015 and a response was received April 20, 2015, which notes that:
“Alexander Robinson Elementary has an operating capacity of 480 students. For the
2014-2015 school year the student enrolment is 534 students (111.25% utilization)
including 212 students from out of catchment.
Samuel Robertson Technical Secondary has an operating capacity of 600 students.
For the 2014-2015 school year the student enrolment is 802 students (133.67%
utilization) including 213 students from out of catchment.”
- 7 -
8)Local Government Act:
An amendment to the OCP requires the local government to consult with any affected parties
and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the
Local Government Act. The amendment required for this application, to redesignate a portion
of the subject property from Conservation to Urban Residential, is considered to be minor in
nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is
required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent
municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial
Governments.
The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste
Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no
impact.
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that first and second reading be given to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7159-2015,
that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7111-2014, and that application 2012-
004-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing.
“Original signed by Ann Edwards”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Ann Edwards, CPT
Senior Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7159-2015
Appendix D – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7111-2014
Appendix E – Subdivision Plan
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Oct 17, 2014 FILE: 2012-004-RZ BY: PC
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,500
23791 112 AVENUE
APPENDIX A
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Oct 17, 2014 FILE: 2012-004-RZ BY: PC
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
District of Maple Ridge´
Scale: 1:2,500
23791 112 AVENUE
(2011 photography image)
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7159-2015
A Bylaw to amend the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedules "B" & "C" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan
Amending Bylaw No. 7159-2015
2.Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Parcel “G” (Reference Plan 1387) Except: Portion on Plan LMP38552 of the South
East Quarter Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 908 , a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby re-designated from Conservation to Urban
Residential.
3.Schedule “C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Parcel “G” (Reference Plan 1387) Except: Portion on Plan LMP38552 of the South
East Quarter Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 909 , a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by removing Conservation.
4.Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of ,20 .
___________________________________ __________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
11306
11346
11430
11230
11221
112272362011421
236672362911226
11232
11376
1117123647 11229
11241
11253
11269 237202372
0 2377323756
23
8
1
3
23
8
2
5
11341
23
8
1
6
11411
23
8
2
6
23
8
3
2 23836238482385423884 2388211316
11374
2360511217236222363011375
11397
236382364111412
11422
11187 2365811225
237
4
6 238022
3
8
0
923806 23
8
2
12381823863 23
8
2
9
23
8
3
3
11373
11340
238482387923851 2389323867238752388511354
11384
11420
11210
11226 2361723635236232365011366
11315
11335
2
3
7
3
6
23750
2
3
8
0
523791 2381011317
11325
11333
11349
2385723871
23862
2387823864
236352365711207 2364311431
23640112162364211386
11432
11257
11305
11377
11399
23757
23
7
4
0
11309
11357
23
8
3
7
23
8
3
6
23
8
4
0 238332388523843
2362111410
11206
11216
236471121123628 2365111342
11163
11209
11215
11249
11345
11413
11423
11433
11155
2
3
7
2
6
23753
2
3
7
3
0
23760
23
8
1
7
11396
11406
238632384223820 23868238992389223872
2361011364
2361111347
11355
236402365011356
11195
11261 23710237092
3
7
2
4
23766
11303
11379
11391
23
8
4
5 2384911296
11336
11398
2363611220
11231
11337
11365
11385
11411
23646112222364811332
11396
11155
11201
11205
11233
11279
11287
11367
11414
23
8
2
0
11365
1139911407
238411136023828
23844238102362211290
2362911200
1124023610 2363311212
11179
11219
11245
11357
11387
11424
23716237
6
3 2377011385
11330
11350
11370
2385823861
112B AVE.
111 A AVE.236A ST.LANEKANAKA WAYCREEKSIDE ST.112 AVE.238 ST.112 AVE.CREEKSIDE ST.111A AVE.
112A AVE.CREEKSIDE ST.113B AVE.236A ST.CREEKSIDE
LANE
113A AVE.238 ST.113 AVE.11
1
15
4
26LMP 5008314
6
16
18 BCP 2410434
8
46
PARK
58
10
1
7
3
20
29
31
16
22
33
13
15
15
PARK20
15
2
3
24
22
21
9
29
21
5
6
36
28
27
23
10
11
9
BCP 33222
29
27
19
21
25
2
LMP 26483LMP 264838
5
25
45
21
LMP 31334
18
LMP 3379737
41
BCP 21397
2
2
1
6 12
3
17 BCP 213976
9
12 11
32
30
12
9
42
LMP 36163
EPP 26771 28 LMP 31334
7
5
LMP 24722
1817
Pcl. 'P'
27
21
LMP 33797
12
17 14
4
16
16
13
12
7
BCP 42842
13
LMP 36163
14
4
7
19
37
25 BCP2798445
BCP 26118
LMP 43730
PARK
(EPS 1815)
RP 1387
26
23
15
24
6
1
32
46
19
17
34
43
14
16
21
17
5
11
1
4
7
25
23
16
8
17
20
5
35
11
1
39
Park
BCP 41985
54
Rem G
PARK
5
1
26 LMP 3379719
LMP 33797
35 36
40
EPP 45993
6
19 18
8
LMP 36163BCP27984
5 7
8
10
10
33
26BCP 1145144
53
18
22
1LMP 385523
3
2
LMP 26483
2
6
19
RP 1224
30
LMP 33797
20
PARK
42
16
38
3
2
16
15
BCP 12853
3
28
BCP 42841
14
8
13
2
10LMP 5008343
41
40
BCP 17100
PARK
57
55 LMP 49698
1413
4
24
28 20
44
11
22
1
19
18
14
BCP 4284110
9
BCP 24104
BCP 27984
27
15
13
31
24
22
12
7
BCP 26244
PARK
30
PARK
20
1
12 11
4 LMP 33797PARK9 8
4
9
2
21
23
18
39
LMP 26487BCP 11452BCP 12856
BCP 20491
EPP 26772BCP 24102LMP 50084
LMP 41836LMP 36164BCP 21398 LMP 30482EP 81201
LMP 36165
BCP24103LMP 6327LMP 33577
LMP 30482BCP 12854
LMP 30218
BCP 12855
RP 75056
BCP 33223LMP 33798EPP 26772BCP 41985´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
Conservation
Urban Residential
7159-2015908
11306
11346
11430
11230
11221
112272362011421
236672362911226
11232
11376
1117123647 11229
11241
11253
11269 237202372
0 2377323756
23
8
1
3
23
8
2
5
11341
23
8
1
6
11411
23
8
2
6
23
8
3
2 23836238482385423884 2388211316
11374
2360511217236222363011375
11397
236382364111412
11422
11187 2365811225
237
4
6 238022
3
8
0
923806 23
8
2
12381823863 23
8
2
9
23
8
3
3
11373
11340
238482387923851 2389323867238752388511354
11384
11420
11210
11226 2361723635236232365011366
11315
11335
2
3
7
3
6
23750
2
3
8
0
523791 2381011317
11325
11333
11349
2385723871
23862
2387823864
236352365711207 2364311431
23640112162364211386
11432
11257
11305
11377
11399
23757
23
7
4
0
11309
11357
23
8
3
7
23
8
3
6
23
8
4
0 238332388523843
2362111410
11206
11216
236471121123628 2365111342
11163
11209
11215
11249
11345
11413
11423
11433
11155
2
3
7
2
6
23753
2
3
7
3
0
23760
23
8
1
7
11396
11406
238632384223820 23868238992389223872
2361011364
2361111347
11355
236402365011356
11195
11261 23710237092
3
7
2
4
23766
11303
11379
11391
23
8
4
5 2384911296
11336
11398
2363611220
11231
11337
11365
11385
11411
23646112222364811332
11396
11155
11201
11205
11233
11279
11287
11367
11414
23
8
2
0
11365
1139911407
238411136023828
23844238102362211290
2362911200
1124023610 2363311212
11179
11219
11245
11357
11387
11424
23716237
6
3 2377011385
11330
11350
11370
2385823861
112B AVE.
111 A AVE.236A ST.LANEKANAKA WAYCREEKSIDE ST.112 AVE.238 ST.112 AVE.CREEKSIDE ST.111A AVE.
112A AVE.CREEKSIDE ST.113B AVE.236A ST.CREEKSIDE
LANE
113A AVE.238 ST.113 AVE.11
1
15
4
26LMP 5008314
6
16
18 BCP 2410434
8
46
PARK
58
10
1
7
3
20
29
31
16
22
33
13
15
15
PARK20
15
2
3
24
22
21
9
29
21
5
6
36
28
27
23
10
11
9
BCP 33222
29
27
19
21
25
2
LMP 26483LMP 264838
5
25
45
21
LMP 31334
18
LMP 3379737
41
BCP 21397
2
2
1
6 12
3
17 BCP 213976
9
12 11
32
30
12
9
42
LMP 36163
EPP 26771 28 LMP 31334
7
5
LMP 24722
1817
Pcl. 'P'
27
21
LMP 33797
12
17 14
4
16
16
13
12
7
BCP 42842
13
LMP 36163
14
4
7
19
37
25 BCP2798445
BCP 26118
LMP 43730
PARK
(EPS 1815)
RP 1387
26
23
15
24
6
1
32
46
19
17
34
43
14
16
21
17
5
11
1
4
7
25
23
16
8
17
20
5
35
11
1
39
Park
BCP 41985
54
Rem G
PARK
5
1
26 LMP 3379719
LMP 33797
35 36
40
EPP 45993
6
19 18
8
LMP 36163BCP27984
5 7
8
10
10
33
26BCP 1145144
53
18
22
1LMP 385523
3
2
LMP 26483
2
6
19
RP 1224
30
LMP 33797
20
PARK
42
16
38
3
2
16
15
BCP 12853
3
28
BCP 42841
14
8
13
2
10LMP 5008343
41
40
BCP 17100
PARK
57
55 LMP 49698
1413
4
24
28 20
44
11
22
1
19
18
14
BCP 4284110
9
BCP 24104
BCP 27984
27
15
13
31
24
22
12
7
BCP 26244
PARK
30
PARK
20
1
12 11
4 LMP 33797PARK9 8
4
9
2
21
23
18
39
LMP 26487BCP 11452BCP 12856
BCP 20491
EPP 26772BCP 24102LMP 50084
LMP 41836LMP 36164BCP 21398 LMP 30482EP 81201
LMP 36165
BCP24103LMP 6327LMP 33577
LMP 30482BCP 12854
LMP 30218
BCP 12855
RP 75056
BCP 33223LMP 33798EPP 26772BCP 41985´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose: To Remove Conservation from Schedule C as shown
7159-2015909
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7111 - 2014
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as
follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as " Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7111 - 2014."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Parcel “G” (Reference Plan 1387) Except: Portion on Plan LMP38552 of the South
East Quarter Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1626 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 28th day of October, 2014.
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX D
11306
11346
11430
11230
11221
112272362011421
236672362911226
11232
11376
1117123647 11229
11241
11253
11269 237202372
0 2377323756
23
8
1
3
23
8
2
5
11341
23
8
1
6
11411
23
8
2
6
23
8
3
2 23836238482385423884 2388211316
11374
2360511217236222363011375
11397
236382364111412
11422
11187 2365811225
237
4
6 238022
3
8
0
923806 23
8
2
12381823863 23
8
2
9
23
8
3
3
11373
11340
238482387923851 2389323867238752388511354
11384
11420
11210
11226 2361723635236232365011366
11315
11335
2
3
7
3
6
23750
2
3
8
0
523791 2381011317
11325
11333
11349
2385723871
23862
2387823864
236352365711207 2364311431
23640112162364211386
11432
11257
11305
11377
11399
23757
23
7
4
0
11309
11357
23
8
3
7
23
8
3
6
23
8
4
0 238332388523843
2362111410
11206
11216
236471121123628 2365111342
11163
11209
11215
11249
11345
11413
11423
11433
11155
2
3
7
2
6
23753
2
3
7
3
0
23760
23
8
1
7
11396
11406
238632384223820 23868238992389223872
2361011364
2361111347
11355
236402365011356
11195
11261 23710237092
3
7
2
4
23766
11303
11379
11391
23
8
4
5 2384911296
11336
11398
2363611220
11231
11337
11365
11385
11411
23646112222364811332
11396
11155
11201
11205
11233
11279
11287
11367
11414
23
8
2
0
11365
1139911407
238411136023828
23844238102362211290
2362911200
1124023610 2363311212
11179
11219
11245
11357
11387
11424
23716237
6
3 2377011385
11330
11350
11370
2385823861
112B AVE.
111 A AVE.236A ST.LANEKANAKA WAYCREEKSIDE ST.112 AVE.238 ST.112 AVE.CREEKSIDE ST.111A AVE.
112A AVE.CREEKSIDE ST.113B AVE.236A ST.CREEKSIDE
LANE
113A AVE.238 ST.113 AVE.11
1
15
4
26LMP 5008314
6
16
18 BCP 2410434
8
46
PARK
58
10
1
7
3
20
29
31
16
22
33
13
15
15
PARK20
15
2
3
24
22
21
9
29
21
5
6
36
28
27
23
10
11
9
BCP 33222
29
27
19
21
25
2
LMP 26483LMP 264838
5
25
45
21
LMP 31334
18
LMP 3379737
41
BCP 21397
2
2
1
6 12
3
17 BCP 213976
9
12 11
32
30
12
9
42
LMP 36163
EPP 26771 28 LMP 31334
7
5
LMP 24722
1817
Pcl. 'P'
27
21
LMP 33797
12
17 14
4
16
16
13
12
7
BCP 42842
13
LMP 36163
14
4
7
19
37
25 BCP2798445
BCP 26118
LMP 43730
PARK
(EPS 1815)
RP 1387
26
23
15
24
6
1
32
46
19
17
34
43
14
16
21
17
5
11
1
4
7
25
23
16
8
17
20
5
35
11
1
39
Park
BCP 41985
54
Rem G
PARK
5
1
26 LMP 3379719
LMP 33797
35 36
40
EPP 45993
6
19 18
8
LMP 36163BCP27984
5 7
8
10
10
33
26BCP 1145144
53
18
22
1LMP 385523
3
2
LMP 26483
2
6
19
RP 1224
30
LMP 33797
20
PARK
42
16
38
3
2
16
15
BCP 12853
3
28
BCP 42841
14
8
13
2
10LMP 5008343
41
40
BCP 17100
PARK
57
55 LMP 49698
1413
4
24
28 20
44
11
22
1
19
18
14
BCP 4284110
9
BCP 24104
BCP 27984
27
15
13
31
24
22
12
7
BCP 26244
PARK
30
PARK
20
1
12 11
4 LMP 33797PARK9 8
4
9
2
21
23
18
39
LMP 26487BCP 11452BCP 12856
BCP 20491
EPP 26772BCP 24102LMP 50084
LMP 41836LMP 36164BCP 21398 LMP 30482EP 81201
LMP 36165
BCP24103LMP 6327LMP 33577
LMP 30482BCP 12854
LMP 30218
BCP 12855
RP 75056
BCP 33223LMP 33798EPP 26772BCP 41985´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
R-1 (Residential District)
7111-20141626
APPENDIX E
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2015-334-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Zoning Bylaw text amendment directing the use of Shipping Containers
First and Second Reading
Bylaw No. 7184-2015
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Council has invited staff to bring forward bylaw amendments in advance of adopting the new Zoning
Bylaw in its entirety. The reasons that specific bylaw amendments are pursued relate to priority
concerns of Council and the community. Due to a concern for safety and orderly development, this
report outlines a proposed amendment for directing the use of shipping containers.
Shipping containers are the enclosed units constructed for storage and transport of goods via ship,
rail or truck. As they are abundant and readily available, there is significant incentive throughout the
community to repurpose them as accessory buildings. Compared to conventional wood framed
structures, these units cost less per unit volume. Due to these circumstances, there is a risk that
the use of these structures may proliferate throughout the community.
A building permit is required for any structure over 10 square metres in area. However, unlawful
structures exist in the community, and bylaw enforcement for such a structure usually occurs as an
official response to a neighbourhood complaint. Unique challenges associated with shipping
containers relate to the risks they pose to health and safety if not appropriately modified for an
alternate use. This risk is due to the combination of poor ventilation and structural strength of these
structures if not modified. If ignited, stored flammable materials can cause these structures to
explode. Documented examples have shown that accidents under these circumstances have
caused human injury and death.
Due to the risks involved, the process of bylaw enforcement for these non-compliant structures
needs to be made clear. A beneficial approach is to explicitly identify in the Zoning Bylaw the
circumstances under which these structures could be used. This approach would assist in
expediting the process of bylaw enforcement if necessary.
A further concern relates to aesthetic considerations. There are examples of adaptive reuse of
shipping containers for residential purposes; however, without architectural intervention these
structures can be unsightly. For this reason a recommended approach is to direct the use of these
structures into uses that will benefit from their economical utility, and prohibit the use of these
structures where they may cause community concerns, especially in residential settings.
1103
- 2 -
This report discusses the issues surrounding shipping containers and recommends Zoning Bylaw
text amendments to direct this use. The four main goals of this report and bylaw recommendations
are to ensure:
1.That the potential risks involved with these units are communicated;
2.That shipping container structures, where permitted, are regulated or modified in
compliance with the Building Code in order to be safe for the use intended;
3.That the economical utility of these structures may be realized where appropriate; and
4.That the potential for the unsightly placement of these structures and the resulting conflicts
be minimized.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7184-2015 be given First and Second Reading, and
be forwarded to Public Hearing.
BACKGROUND:
Applicant: City of Maple Ridge
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This proposed text amendment has arisen out of concerns for the unlawful use of shipping
containers as accessory buildings. A few of these structures have been placed on residential
properties within the community, and enforcement process has proven especially challenging with
the absence of specific language in the Zoning Bylaw. To assist with meeting this challenge, this
proposed text amendment will explicitly outline the conditions for using these structures for
temporary, industrial, agricultural, or institutional purposes. This text amendment does not
anticipate the use of shipping containers on typical urban residential properties, except as a
temporary use during a phase of construction.
PLANNING ANALYSIS:
As shipping containers are plentiful and inexpensive, there is considerable incentive to repurpose
them as accessory buildings. However, there are serious potential risks involved with their use, and
neighbours often find them unsightly.
1.Communicating the risks : In September 2014, the Fire Chief’s Association of BC issued a
position paper (https://fcabc.ca/Files/FCABC%20Shipping%20Containers.pdf) that noted the
potential explosive effects of shipping containers if improperly used for storing flammable
substances. In 2011, a shipping container explosion in Enderby BC, created by an internal fire
caused the container doors to eject, which struck and killed the attending fire captain. A similar
incident in Saanich in 2013 caused by a leaking barbecue tank did not cause injury, but the radius
of the explosion was 274 metres (300 yards).
- 3 -
These two incidents demonstrate the considerable risks associated with these structures, unless
modified to accommodate the new use by venting or weakening the structure. The reason these
structures are so risky is due to their poorly ventilated but sturdy steel construction. Their structural
strength allows these units to withstand significant internal pressure buildup, with the doors being
the weakest part of the structure. The lack of proper ventilation will allow internal atmospheric
pressure to build to the point of exploding the structure. Small volumes of stored fuel are sufficient
to cause this effect.
The Fire Chief’s position paper recommends a number of steps for Federal and Provincial
governments to take for accident prevention. The recommendation for local governments is to
adopt bylaws to regulate the use of shipping containers as buildings, requiring code upgrades and
inspection services prior to approval and placement.
2.Regulating or modifying shipping containers to be safe for the use intended: The Fire Chief’s
position paper discusses potential mitigation strategies for reducing risks associated with shipping
containers. These strategies include adopting regulations, requiring structural alterations, and
establishing safety protocols. Regulations for these structures could involve prescribing or
prohibiting the types of substances that could be stored within the shipping container. Modifying the
structure to eliminate the risk of explosion could involve weakening the structure, or installing
ventilation to equalize the pressure difference. Ventilation would also allow smoke to escape from
the structure, which would therefore alert those nearby of the presence of a fire. It should be noted
that these modifications would be required as part of the building permit and inspection process
established for making these structures legal and code compliant. Safety protocols could be a
standard set of operating procedures for fire departments to follow when faced with a potentially
hazardous situation involving shipping containers.
3.Recognizing the economic utility of shipping containers : As an adaptive reuse, shipping
containers are economical to use for storage purposes. For this reason, it is recommended that
they be permitted in specific contexts, as follows:
a)as a temporary use during construction: a shipping container could be used as a
temporary office or for equipment storage on a property for which a valid building permit
had been issued. In this instance, security would need to be posted to cover the cost of
removal of the structure within 30 days of the closing or expiry of the building permit.
b)as accessory to an institutional use: Reduction of visual impact with a continuous
landscape screen would be a condition of use.
c)as accessory to an industrial use: Reduction of visual impact with a continuous
landscape screen would be a condition of use.
d)as an agricultural use: Demonstration of need would be required, along with farm status
from BC Assessment Authority.
In all cases where shipping containers are permitted, a building permit and inspection services will
be required to ensure that the structure is modified to be safe for the intended use.
- 4 -
4. Minimizing the potential for unsightly premises:
Shipping containers are proposed to be permitted as a temporary use on residential properties
during a period of construction where a valid building permit has been issued. With this exception,
shipping containers are recommended to be prohibited as accessory structures for residential uses.
Zoning Bylaw:
In order to recognize and regulate this use, the following recommendations are proposed to amend
the Zoning Bylaw.
Part 2 Definitions,
Shipping Container means an enclosed unit used or intended to be used for storing and
transporting goods via ship, rail or truck, whether or not it is actually being used for such a purpose.
Part 4 General Regulations,
A shipping container may be used:
a) as a temporary use for office or equipment storage in all zones, during a phase of
construction in progress, subject to issuance of a current and valid building permit.
Security must be posted to cover the cost of removal of the structure within 30 days of
the closing or expiry of the building permit.
b) as accessory to an institutional use where enclosed behind a continuous landscape
screen.
c) as accessory to an industrial use where enclosed behind a continuous landscape
screen.
d) as accessory to an agricultural use. Demonstration of need would be required, along
with farm status from BC Assessment Authority.
Where permitted, a shipping container shall only be used, placed, stored, repaired, cleaned,
upgraded, or modified to comply with the requirements of the zone as if it were a building or
structure.
The following shall not be stored in a shipping container:
(a) Gasoline, propane, or any other flammable, combustible liquid or compressed gas; or
(b) Explosive as defined in the Maple Ridge Fire Prevention By-law No. 4111-1988.
CITIZEN/CUSTOMER IMPLICATIONS :
The intent of this bylaw amendment is to protect public safety and maintain orderly development
while recognizing the needs of industrial, institutional, and agricultural users.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL IMPLICATIONS:
This proposed bylaw amendment has been prepared in collaboration with staff from the Maple
Ridge Fire Department, Planning, Building, and Bylaws.
- 5 -
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Increased staffing costs for inspection services and permitting are anticipated to be recovered
through the municipal application fee schedule.
ALTERNATIVES:
Council is advised to proceed with a bylaw amendment that recognizes the use of shipping
containers in specific contexts to maximize their economic utility, but prohibits this use in residential
settings in order to avoid hazards and unsightly premises concerns. As an alternative, Council may
wish to prohibit these structures entirely within the municipality, or to leave the Zoning Bylaw
unchanged.
CONCLUSION:
This proposed bylaw amendment has been prepared in response primarily to concerns for public
safety. In addition, aesthetic concerns are being considered, and as a result the proposed use of
these structures is intended to take advantage of their economic utility by locating them in
industrial, agricultural, or institutional contexts. With the exception of temporary uses during a
phase of construction, these structures are proposed to be prohibited in residential zones, where
nuisance issues would be most apparent.
“Original signed by Diana Hall”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Diana Hall M.A., MCIP, RPP
Planner 2
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter M.PL., MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA. P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Zoning Bylaw No. 7184-2015
Link: BC Fire Chiefs position paper on shipping containers:
https://fcabc.ca/Files/FCABC%20Shipping%20Containers.pdf
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO.7184-2015
A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended.
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7184-2015."
2.PART 2, INTERPRETATION
Insert the following definition in alphabetical order after the definition of “setback”.
SHIPPING CONTAINER means an enclosed unit used or intended to be used for storing and
transporting goods via ship, rail or truck, whether or not it is actually being used for such a
purpose.
3.PART 4 GENERAL REGULATIONS, SECTION 402 REGULATIONS FOR PERMITTED USES OF
LAND, BUILDINGS, AND STRUCTURES.
Insert the following as subsection (14)
A shipping container may be used
a)as a temporary use for office or equipment storage in all zones, during a phase of
construction in progress, subject to issuance of a current and valid building permit. Security
must be posted to cover the cost of removal of the structure within 30 days of the closing or
expiry of the building permit.
b)as accessory to an institutional use where enclosed behind a continuous landscape screen.
c)as accessory to an industrial use where enclosed behind a continuous landscape screen.
d)as accessory to an agricultural use. Demonstration of need would be required, along with
farm status from BC Assessment Authority.
Where permitted, a shipping container shall only be used, placed, stored, repaired, cleaned,
upgraded, or modified to comply with the requirements of the zone as if it were a building or
structure.
The following shall not be stored in a shipping container:
(a) Gasoline, propane, or any flammable, combustible liquid or compressed gas; or
(b) Explosive as defined in the Maple Ridge Fire Prevention By-law No. 4111-1988.
APPENDIX A
4. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended is hereby amended
accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20 .
READ a second time the day of , 20 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 .
READ a third time the day of , 20 .
ADOPTED, the day of , 20 .
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2015-361-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C0W
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7190-2015
Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment for a “1 km rule” fo r Wine Stores in Grocery Stores
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At a Council Meeting held on November 24, 2015, Council directed staff to bring forward a bylaw to
establish a 1 kilometre distance rule (the 1-km Rule) through a Zoning Bylaw amendment for all
future alcohol beverage retailers in Maple Ridge. Council passed the following resolution:
That the City hereby begin the preparation of a zoning bylaw in the form of a bylaw attached as
Appendix “H” of the staff report dated August 31, 2015 to prohibit the sale of liquor in any
grocery store located within one kilometer of a license retail store or government liquor store.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7190-2015 be given first and second reading , and
forwarded to Public Hearing.
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
Council received a letter dated June 18, 2015 from the Alliance of Beverage Licensees (ABLE BC)
(see Appendix A) regarding Bill 22, the new Special Wine Store Licence Auction Act. The Alliance
expressed concern about the impact of wine sales in grocery stores on private liquor stores (referred
to as “licensee retail stores” under the Liquor Control and Licensing Act and the Liquor Control and
Licensing Regulation).
At a Council Meeting held on July 28, 2015, Council directed staff to prepare a report on options for
implementing a minimum 1 kilometre distance rule (the 1-km Rule) through a Zoning Bylaw
amendment for all future alcohol beverage retailers in Maple Ridge. Council passed the following
resolution:
That staff be directed to prepare a report on options for the implementation of a minimum
one km distance rule for all future beverage alcohol retailers in Maple Ridge.
The requested report was presented at Workshop on August 31, 2015, at which time; Council was
presented with three options to proceed with in response to the ABLE BC.
1104
These options were:
1.Make no changes and maintain the “status quo” with the Liquor Control Licencing Branch
regulating the licensing of liquor sales in grocery stores through their regulations and
directives; or
2.Amend the Zoning Bylaw to prohibit liquor sales in all grocery stores, such that a site specific
Zoning Bylaw amendment would be required for any grocery store wishing to sell wine or
other liquor; or
3.Amend the Zoning Bylaw to prohibit the sale of liquor in grocery stores that are located within
1 kilometre of an existing liquor store
Council selected Option 2, granted first and second readings to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw
No. 7162-2015 on August 31, 2015, held Public Hearings on September 15 and October 20, 2015,
and defeated the bylaw when third reading was considered on October 27, 2015. In the interim
period between Council’s decision to defeat the amending bylaw (No.7162 - 2015) and the decision
to again reconsider the matter (Nov 27th, 2015), an application was received for a business licence
from a grocery store for wine sales. Given that there was no restriction in place and Council had
dealt with the issue fully, the business licence was issued. Any new amendment by Council to the
Zoning Bylaw intending to restrict wine sales in grocery stores cannot be applied retroactively to this
store (i.e. it is now grandfathered).
On November 27, 2015, Council directed staff to bring forward a bylaw in line with Option 3 to
establish a 1 kilometre distance rule (the 1-km Rule) through a Zoning Bylaw amendment.
The requested bylaw Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7190-2015 is attached as Appendix B.
CONCLUSION
On November 24, 2015, Council requested that a 1 kilometre distance rule (the 1-km Rule) be
established through a Zoning Bylaw amendment for all future alcohol beverage retailers in Maple
Ridge, be brought forward to be considered for first and second reading and be advanced to Public
Hearing. That bylaw is attached for Council’s consideration.
“Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski”_____________
Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP
Planner
“Original signed by Chuck Goddard” for___________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”___________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng.
GM: Public Works & Development Services
Appendix A – Letter from Alliance of Beverage Licensees (ABLE BC)
Appendix B - Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7190-2015
APPENDIX A
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7190-2015
A Bylaw to prohibit liquor sales in grocery stores within one kilometre of a liquor store
__________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Bylaw No. 3510-1985;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
Citation
1.This Bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7190-2015.”
Amendments
1.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 is amended by adding the following under
Part 4, GENERAL REGULATIONS, Section 401(3):
(g) The sale in or from an ineligible grocery store, or in or from a store located in an
ineligible grocery store, of beer, cider, wine or spirits, or any other product
intended for human consumption, that contains more than 1% alcohol by volume,
except a product produced primarily for cooking purposes, and for this purpose
“ineligible grocery store” means a grocery store any part of any public entrance to
which is located within 1 kilometre, measured in a straight line, from any part of
any public entrance to a Licensee Retail Store or government liquor store that is
carrying on business when sales referred to in this section commence.
READ a first time the day of 2015.
READ a second time the day of 2015.
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of 2015.
READ a third time the day of 2015.
ADOPTED, the day of 2015.
_______________________________ ________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX B
Page 1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Reid DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: COW
SUBJECT: First, Second and Third Readings
Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7191-2015
Development Application Fee Amending Bylaw No. 7192-2015
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The proposed Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133 - 2015 (Tree Bylaw) will provide a
more responsible and pro-active approach to tree protection, management, and replacement in
Maple Ridge.
The proposed Bylaw considers ongoing issues, challenges and opportunities that our community is
facing based on feedback from Council and citizens. It reflects current social, economic, and
ecological principles, objectives and policies reflected in the municipal Official Community Plan and
Corporate Plans. It also considers the unique geography of Maple Ridge, along with other important
factors such as weather patterns, land use history, socio-economic conditions, and new information
about how tree management can assist local governments to grow in a smarter and more
sustainable manner. Overall, it includes a comprehensive regulatory framework that emphasizes
new requirements with respect to tree protection, management and replacement measures.
In Nov. 2014, Council directed that the Tree Bylaw be reviewed and the process was subsequently
endorsed in February 2015. Since that time, there has been extensive feedback from residents,
tree experts, and other community stakeholders stemming from on-line questionnaires, open
houses, emails and meeting with Council.
The result of this consultation is a balanced bylaw that neither prohibits nor impedes development
related activity or routine tree maintenance on private property. Rather, it is designed to improve tree
protection, mitigation and replacement efforts especially where large scale clearing and cumulative
tree removal is taking place over time. It is designed to promote responsible tree cutting practices
across the City to help mitigate or reduce impacts on neighboring properties . It also includes re-
planting or cost recovery requirements where tree clearing is taking place to help offset impacts to
the broader community from cumulative tree losses and ensure a healthy tree canopy cover for
future generations.
RECOMMENDATION:
1.That Maple Ridge Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133 – 2015 be given first,
second and third reading.
2.That Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7191-2015 be given first,
second and third reading.
3.That Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Amending Bylaw No. 7192-2015 be given first,
second and third reading.
1105
Page 2
BACKGROUND
Historically, Maple Ridge citizens have noted through various consultation programs, surveys,
correspondence, their key concerns and issues associated with irresponsible and large scale tree
removal that has negatively impacted adjacent properties, citizens, municipal resources, and
taxpayers.
Common issues generally include erosion and sediment control concerns, slope stability, drainage
and flooding, risks associated with blowdown or windfall where new forest edges have been created,
as well as long term impacts to the natural landscape that have been established in neighborhoods.
Other key issues associated with cumulative tree loss and large scale tree removal includes loss of
numerous economic, social, and ecological services and benefits that trees provide to the
community.
The Tree Bylaw (No. 7133-2015) has been drafted taking into consideration lessons learned from
other local governments from the Lower Mainland and other municipalities in B.C. Numerous
discussions have taken place with other municipal tree bylaw officers and urban foresters to learn
from their successes and mistakes. The City of Maple Ridge has also had an opportunity to work
with the City Solicitor to review the proposed Tree Protection and Management Bylaw so it can be
enforceable in a B.C. Court of Law. Furthermore, there has been over nine months of tree permit
application review involving over 300+ properties within Maple Ridge that have helped as a testing
ground for existing and proposed regulations, issues, and concerns on the ground.
Furthermore, the proposed Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 includes a
regulatory framework that reflect current community values, principles, and objectives concerning
protection and management of trees which are outlined in the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan.
Existing Maple Ridge OCP Policy Framework
The main components of the proposed Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
reflect current OCP principles, objectives, and policies as listed below:
Tree Protection
OCP Objectives: Ensure mature trees are maintained and protected where possible and replant if
necessary encouraging the use of native species.
(OCP Policy 5-13) Maple Ridge will promote retention of urban and mature trees and woodland
areas, and ensure additional trees are provided as part of all development
proposals;
(OCP Policy 5-40) Maple Ridge will encourage tree retention and tree protection programs;
Tree Management
OCP Objectives: Maple Ridge will pursue low impact development measures where possible and
increase ‘carbon sink’ effects through tree planting and protection.
(OCP Policy 5-22) Landscape disturbance should be minimized by retaining trees where possible
and require replanting or enhanced planting as a condition of development;
(OCP Policy 5-43) Maple Ridge will maintain and enhance its forests and woodland areas; and
(OCP Policy 5-45) encourage low impact ‘smart’ development, and will promote initiatives that
reduce community greenhouse emissions & help offset climate change impacts;
Page 3
Tree Replacement
OCP Objectives Identify, protect and enhance ecosystems, sensitive areas and features
(OCP Policy 5-31) Require enhancement & rehabilitation of lands as part of development process;
(OCP Policy 5-40) Maintain and enhance forests and woodland areas; and
(OCP Policy 5-43) Include climate change considerations and initiatives
CONSULTATION PROCESS
The following consultation process was endorsed by Council on February 2, 2015 as part of the
previous Tree Management Bylaw review to encourage community input, transparency, and provide
citizens with opportunities for feedback:
Table 1. Tree Management Bylaw Process & Timelines
Step I – Council Endorse Review Process & Amendments to current Bylaw No.
5896-2000
Council to endorse the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw
review/consultation process;
Consideration and granting of 1st, 2nd, 3rd reading of Tree Protection
Amending Bylaw 7134-2015 at Workshop.
Feb.2,2015
Step II – Focus Group Feedback – proposed “draft” Tree Management Bylaw to be
circulated to local professional tree experts including arborists, foresters, woodlot
managers, development consultants, environmental professionals, and
environmental stewardship groups.
Late Feb.
March
Step III –Open House – consultation with general public & neighbourhood groups
April 2015
Step IV – Consultation Update to Council – provide feedback on what we heard to
Council with reports and presentation on revisions to Tree Protection and
Management Bylaw for review, questions, and consideration.
Additional consultation step added Sept. 15- Oct 5, 2015.
Final update to Council at Workshop Nov. 16, 2015
June to
Sept. 2015
Step V - Final Consideration of Tree Protection and Management
Bylaw No. 7133-2015 for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Reading
Dec 8,
2015
Step VI - Final Adoption Jan 2016
Page 4
CONSULTATION RESULTS
An outline of the Tree Bylaw consultation process was presented and endorsed by Council on
February 2, 2015. An update on the proposed Bylaw, the review process and consultation feedback
was provided to Council on four separate occasions at Council Workshop; including February, June,
September, and November of 2015. Over the past nine months, the overall consultation process
included feedback and comments received from a wide variety of participants through various
consultation mechanisms which are outlined below:
1.There were 639 Tree Bylaw questionnaires submitted to the City of Maple Ridge;
2.Over 30 tree experts and other local government Tree Bylaw officers that provided verbal and
written comments;
3.Approximately 150 people attended the Public Open House attendees for the proposed Tree
Protection and Management Bylaw;
4.Over 240 permit applications and site visits occurred under the interim tree bylaw;
5.Over 200 phone calls and emails from citizens;
6.There were four Council Workshop sessions;
7.City Solicitors review; and
8.There were 64 written responses during the final consultation period.
Overall, the extensive consultation review process provided by the City enables citizens, tree experts,
Council, City Solicitors, and other stakeholders in the community to participate and provide feedback
which helped to create an innovative, balanced, and responsible Tree Protection and Management
Bylaw for the City of Maple Ridge.
Brief Outline of Tree Bylaw Consultation Process and Findings to Date:
(1) November 2014 – Council directed staff to prepare a scoping report for a review of tree
regulations based on feedback from community stakeholders over the past several years.
The Maple Ridge Tree Protection Bylaw was identified as being outdated, ineffective, and
inflexible.
(2) February 2015 – Council directed a review of previous regulations and practices take place
and that amendments occur to ensure more effective regulation for tree removal activity.
(3) February to November 2015 – The Tree Bylaw review and consultation period included:
A regional wide comparative assessment of what other municipalities are doing with
respect to tree bylaws including emphasis on protection and management
regulations;
An analysis of local weaknesses, strengths, opportunities, and options in terms of
tree regulations, standards or best practices, fiscal implications, and exemptions;
Meetings with tree experts, questionnaires and open houses with general public, and
workshops with Mayor and Council on the proposed tree protection and management
objectives, regulations, processes, and best practices;
A review of interim tree permit applications including consideration of implications for
previous, current and proposed tree management requirements; and
Solicitor’s input with emphasis on creating a legally sound regulatory framework that
is enforceable in a court of law.
(4) Final consideration by Council of the proposed Tree Protection and Management Bylaw –
Page 5
The proposed Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 and consultation process will
result in the following improvements:
Legislative clarity and consistency with requirements of senior environmental
agencies as well as municipal OCP objectives, bylaws, and best practices;
Improved framework that focuses on pro-active protection, responsible management,
and replacement requirements for new developments and clearcutting applications;
Comprehensive and flexible framework for dealing with potential tree protection,
management, and replacement efforts for non development applications in urban,
suburban, and rural areas;
Greater consideration of services and benefits associated with tree canopy cover;
Improved supervision, coordination, & monitoring by professional consultants;
Greater flexibility and cost recovery opportunities for permit application fees; and
Greater strength and clarity with respect to enforcement measures.
BYLAW OVERVIEW:
There are five key components to the proposed Tree Protection and Management Bylaw:
1. Application and scope of the Tree Management Bylaw
2. Tree Protection Measures
3. Tree Management requirements
4. Tree Replacement requirements
5. Exemptions and Fees
The following is a summary of key components under the proposed Tree Bylaw 7133-2015:
Permit Application and Exemption Measures:
o Applies to Permit Trees over 20cm dbh;
o Applies to tree cutting applicants in urban, suburban, and rural areas;
o Applies to development and non-development tree cutting activity;
o Exemptions for farming activity, hazard trees, dead or dying trees, trees within 2
metres of building structures, and minimum 10 trees can be removed per year in
rural areas (lots over 0.5 ha) if they have met minimum tree canopy cover targets,
and limited exemptions for alders/cottonwoods per year in urban/rural areas;
o Tree Management Plans required for new developments or larger scale clearing
(more than 20 trees) and Arborist Report required for building permits, smaller scale
cutting (more than 5 trees), or cutting of Significant Trees.
Proposed Protection Measures:
o Protection assessment is required for significant trees on every site with
consideration for tree expert opinions, recommendations of consultants of record,
along with City Arborist and other municipal decision makers;
o Retention plan, tree survey and arborist report is required for significant tree stands
with new greenfield developments, and tree permit applications where clearcutting is
taking place, or more than 20 trees are being removed;
o Requirements on all sites for retention measures for trees located along the
perimeter of properties, retention consideration for blowdown concerns, drainage,
and root protection zones;
Page 6
o On site retention measures are required before, during, and after construction for
development activity to ensure long term survival of trees that are supposed to be
protected including park trees, protected areas, adjacent sites;
Consideration must be given to factors such as risk and safety, land use rights, site
characteristics, developable areas, and compensation opportunities with each site.
Proposed Management and Mitigation Measures:
Tree mitigation requirements for new developments, or clearcutting applications, or large
scale removal where more than 20 permit trees are being removed or cut:
o Tree Management Plans and tree survey including supporting studies, tree inventory,
retention and replacement plans, mitigation recommendations;
o Supervision, coordination, inspection, and monitoring by tree expert of record;
o City Arborist – site visits, permit review, enforcement and compliance;
o Tree security deposits for significant tree replacements & maintenance.
Tree mitigation requirements for new building permits and other development related
permits where less than 20 permit trees are being removed:
o Arborist report and tree survey including information on what is being removed, what
is being retained, what is being replaced;
o Mitigation measures proposed during construction;
o Replacement plan and potential security deposits.
Replacement Measures:
A minimum retention ratio of 16 trees per acre (40 trees per hectare) is required for all sites
with a Tree Permit application or appropriate tree replacement measures are required.
Currently, Metro Vancouver has a regional target of 40% tree canopy cover target for the region
as a whole, but t h e C i t y o f Maple Ridge will likely exceed this tree canopy cover
target. G iven existing and proposed tree protection and re-planting requirements under the
Tree P r o t e c t i o n a n d Management Bylaw, in addition to other municipal conservation
requirements, the City of Maple Ridge should maintain an overall tree canopy cover of 50-55%.
If trees cannot be replaced on the same lot, the owner may plant on another parcel, private or
public land, as approved by City; or may pay cash in lieu of $425 per replacement tree (to a
maximum of 40 trees per ha or $17,000 and 16 trees per acre or $6,800). The cash
compensation would be placed in a Tree Fund that will be used only for planting of trees on
public and private lands to replace tree canopy lost, for tree stewardship initiatives, or to
purchase public land for re-planting purposes.
Enforcement and Compliance:
The administration and enforcement of the Tree Bylaw will be the responsibility of the Planning
Department’s Environmental staff. Implementation of this bylaw will involve a review and inspection
mechanism similar to the one already used by the Planning Department for the current Tree Permit
and Soil Deposit Permit Process. An Environmental Technician who is a certified Arborist and Tree
Risk Assessor will review and evaluate permit applications, and conduct site visits to confirm bylaw
compliance.
Page 7
There are various tools that can be used by the City to help with enforcement related matters and
improve compliance with municipal objectives and requirements:
o Certified tree experts of record and landowners will be responsible for ensuring safe
practices, and they will be responsible for preparing Tree Management Plans for each site,
supervising tree cutting crews and monitoring tree protection measures until development
completion.
o Proposed Stop Work Orders and tickets can be issued immediately for Bylaw
infractions rather than fines which can take time to implement or enforce in a Court of
Law.
o Staff can deny a tree cutting permit application that doesn’t meet or comply with
Tree Management Bylaw regulations.
o Environmental performance securities are proposed for protection of trees and where
replacement trees are required.
o Appeal to Council if a Tree Permit is denied.
Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 6929-2012 has been amended to
include some larger fines, expanded to include new regulations proposed in the Tree Management
Bylaw, and there are also a few updates to Bylaw section numbers. Details can be found in Appendix
B. It is recommended that the Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7191-
2015 be given first, second and third Readings.
Proposed Permit Fee Structure
The proposed Permit Fee Structure will provide the following:
o Self-sufficient fiscal mechanism to support staff resources for Bylaw implementation
including provision of technical assistance to landowners, permit review, enforcement
and outreach.1
o Reasonable costs for small scale tree removal or small scale development with
minimum tree removal to encourage citizens to work with Tree Permit process.
o Higher permit fee costs for larger scale clearing vs. cost based on size of properties to
help offset costs of staff resources and costs to community from tree removal impacts.
o Some fee exemptions are included for applicants that wish to pursue tree removal that
have active farm use status, landowners with hazard trees, dead or danger trees, trees
within 2 metres of building structures, or trees that are causing economic damage to
infrastructure and structures.
The following permit fees are being proposed for the new Tree Bylaw No. 7133-2015:
TREE CUTTING PERMIT (see Bylaw 7133-2015)
(a) Urban Area and Urban Reserve lots
and Rural parcels less than 0.5 ha $50 for first tree + $25 each additional tree;
(b) Rural Area on
parcels greater than 0.5 hectares $50 for 11th tree + $25 each additional tree;
(c) Development & large scale clearing $200 base fee + $25 per tree;
(d) Tree replacement $425 per tree;
(e) Parcels with active farm use $0
1 The Planning Dept. 2016 Business Plan includes a request to fund an Environmental Technician (Arborist).
Page 8
The additional fee per tree to be removed will help the City of Maple Ridge recover costs on more
complex sites where substantial tree removal is taking place and additional municipal resources are
required to carry out site visits, review information and coordinate consultants, and carry out
enforcement duties.
A City Arborist position will be funded through the proposed tree permit fees. The City will likely
reduce previous costs associated with tree cutting by having a full time City Arborist. A City Arborist
can help implement, monitor, and enforce the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw. The
previous Tree Bylaw emphasized a reactive approach to tree cutting with minimal technical
assistance, supervision and enforcement capability which resulted in increased costs to the City
from safety concerns and liability issues, enforcement works, and staff time attempting to clean up
after the damage had been done. The proposed permit fee structure will likely reduce the number
of enforcement calls, liability issues, and impacts that occurred in previous years.
Therefore, Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Bylaw No. 5949-2001 has been amended to
reflect the new fees as shown in Appendix C. It is recommended that the Development Application
Fee Amending Bylaw No. 7192-2015 be given first, second and third Readings.
TABLE 2. Summary of Tree Protection and Management Bylaw Changes
Bylaw Section Previous Bylaw Application Tree Protection & Mgmt Bylaw
Application Urban Area only on lots larger
than 1 acre; or large enough
to subdivide;
Watercourse areas up to
15m;
Steep slopes over 30%.
Trees > 20 cm dbh;
All urban and rural lands;
both development and non-
development lands except where
exemptions apply
Exemptions First 3 tree removals on urban
lots require no tree permit;
Exemptions urban lots < 1
acre;
Exemptions for rural lots;
Exemptions for development;
All tree removals require a permit
except where exemptions apply:
trees <20cm dbh width;
hazard, dead or dying trees;
trees within 2 m of structures;
hedges, alders & cottonwoods
with some parameters
up to 10 permit trees/yr on rural
lots if >0.5ha, trees < 70cm, and
lot must meet 30% canopy
cover.
Permit
Requirements
No criteria to refuse permit;
No qualifications required for
safety and knowledge of work
Circumstances listed under which tree
cutting permit will be issued or denied;
Qualifications for work to be performed
Page 9
Replacements Only required if violation i.e.
removals in a watercourse
setback or on steep slopes or
unpermitted removals
Replacements required on all sites, if
less than 16 trees per acre (or
equivalent) remain on parcel;
Cash in lieu option if unable to
accommodate replacements;
Security Deposits for large scale cutting;
Tree
Protection
No requirements to protect or
retain trees on development
sites or non development
sites; Heritage protection for
trees on Shady Lane road
ROW;
Protection criteria for Significant
Trees > 70 cm DBH where possible;
Heritage Trees on Shady Lane
ROW;
Retention Plans for trees along the
perimeter of lots and low impact
development requirements;
Protection requirements to ensure
temporary protection of trees from
damage during construction period;
Protection areas required for
developers with re-planting zones.
Hazardous
Trees
No requirements to manage
for hazard trees on
development sites or consider
impacts to adjacent property.
Requirement for professional
hazard tree assessments to be
completed before and after
development activity completed;
Requirements to consider impacts
including wind firm edges.
Tree
Management
Plan
No requirements Requirement for developers, builders
and large scale clearing applicants to
consider how to mitigate the impacts of
tree cutting both on site & off site;
Tree retention plan and Tree
Replacement plans are required;
Requirements for site supervisor,
coordination by Forester or Arborist.
Page 10
NEXT STEPS:
A brief summary of the next steps and recommendations
Ongoing Review of Tree Management Bylaw
The proposed Bylaw will require a review with Mayor and Council in 2016 to address any
potential issues, resource requirements, and revisions that might need to occur.
Clarify Communications Responsibilities & Outreach For Stakeholders
Further clarification on Tree Bylaw procedures, requirements, and best practices will be
needed for community stakeholders which can be achieved through various mechanisms
including development of educational and outreach materials on the Tree Protection and
Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 with the assistance of the municipal website, front
counter handouts, building forum presentations, and updates to development package
information checklists.
Amend Maple Ridge Ticketing Bylaw and Permit Fee Bylaw
It is recommended that Maple Ridge Ticket Information Amending Bylaw No. 7191-2015and
Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Amending Bylaw No. 7192-2015 be amended to
reflect the proposed changes to the Tree Protection and Management Bylaw 7133-2015.
Details on the proposed amendments to these Bylaws are included in the Appendices.
CONCLUSIONS:
Based on the City of Maple Ridge’s OCP objectives and policies in addition to feedback from Council
and the broader community stakeholders, there is a need for a more comprehensive, effective, and
suitable Tree Protection and Management Bylaw for the City of Maple Ridge.
The proposed Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No.7133-2015 will result in the following
improvements:
Legislative clarity and consistency with requirements of senior environmental agencies as
well as municipal OCP objectives, bylaws, and best practices;
Improved regulatory framework that focuses on pro-active protection, responsible
management, and replacement requirements for new developments, clearcutting
applications, large scale tree removal and for all other tree permit applicants;
Comprehensive and flexible permit framework for dealing with tree protection, management,
and replacement issues in urban, suburban, and rural areas;
Greater consideration of services and benefits associated with tree canopy cover including
minimum tree canopy cover targets and replacement requirements;
Improved supervision, coordination, & monitoring by professional consultants;
Greater flexibility and cost recovery opportunities for permit application fees; and
Greater strength and clarity with respect to enforcement measures.
Page 11
Therefore, it is recommended that the proposed Tree Protection and Management Bylaw No. 7133 –
2015 be granted first, second, and third readings.
“Original signed by Rod Stott”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Rod Stott,
Environmental Planner
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A. Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
Appendix B. Maple Ridge Ticket Information Amending Bylaw No. 7191-2015
Appendix C. Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Amending Bylaw No. 7192-2015
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
TREE PROTECTION & MANAGEMENT BYLAW
BYLAW NO. 7133-2015
A bylaw to manage the urban forest and tree canopy and regulate, prohibit and impose requirements
in relation to tree cutting and removal in Maple Ridge.
WHEREAS, section 8(3)(c) of the Community Charter enables Council by bylaw to regulate and
prohibit, and impose requirements in relation to the cutting and removal of trees;
AND WHEREAS, sections 15 and 194 of the Community Charter enable Council to permit and
establish conditions and fees for permit issuance;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.Citation
This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as the “Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-
2015”.
2.Repeal
The “Maple Ridge Tree Protection Bylaw No. 5896-2000” is hereby repealed.
3.Definitions
“Agricultural use” means the use of land for the growing of crops or the raising of livestock as
permitted under the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw.
“Certified Arborist” means a person who is certified by the International Society of Arboriculture
(ISA).
“City” means the City of Maple Ridge.
“City Arborist” means a person employed by the City of Maple Ridge, who has current certification as
a Certified Arborist and uses that certification as part of their job description.
“City Tree Fund” means the money collected by the City through replacement cash-in-lieu as per
Schedule “E” of this Bylaw for the sole use of replacing lost tree canopy through the planting of trees
on public and private properties, and affiliated extension activities to educate the public on the
importance of trees and requirement of tree permits within the City.
“Conservation Area” means a streamside protection and enhancement area as defined in the
Streamside Protection Regulation or slopes over 25% or land subject to a geotechnical covenant or
habitat protection covenant.
APPENDIX A
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 2
“Critical Root Zone” means the area of land surrounding the trunk of a tree contained within a circle
of radius equal to the DBH of the tree multiplied by 18; or equal to the dripline of the tree; whichever
is greater.
“Cut” and “Cutting” means the removal, knocking down or cutting into, any or all parts, of any tree in
such a manner that damages or is detrimental to the health of any tree; and shall include the
topping of a tree.
“Damage” and “Damaging” means any action which will cause a tree to die or to decline in health;
including, but not limited to, cutting, ringing, poisoning, burning, topping, or excessive pruning.
“DBH” means the diameter of a tree at breast height, measured from a height of 130 cm above
natural grade of the ground, as measured from the base of the tree. For multi-stemmed trees, the
DBH is equal to the cumulative total of the DBH of each stem.
“Developable Area” means the parts of a parcel which are not in a Conservation Area
“Drainage System” means the system and network of streams, creeks, waterways, watercourses,
waterworks, ditches, drains, or sewers located in the City on private or public property, by which
water is conveyed or travels from lands.
“Drip Line” means the vertical line extending down from the outer most branches of the tree to the
natural grade of the land.
“Environmental Technician” means the person employed by the City of Maple Ridge with the job title
of Environmental Technician.
“Excessive Suspended Solids Discharge” means an indirect or direct fluid discharge containing
suspended solids exceeding 75 milligrams per litre into any drainage system.
“Farm Plan” means a plan prepared by a professional Agrologist that indicates the proposed use of
agriculturally zoned land for agricultural purposes. The Farm Plan would indicate placement of
structures and production areas, ponds, pastures and fencing specifically for agricultural use.
“Floodplain” means the land that is adjacent to a watercourse that is subject to regular flooding, as
depicted on the current Maple Ridge mapping floodplain layer.
“Hazard tree” means a tree that is determined to be currently in a condition dangerous to people or
property in a report prepared by a Qualified Tree Risk Assessor, that is to be reviewed and approved
by the City.
“Heritage Tree Protection Area” means the area of land designated for tree protection as shown in
Schedule “A” to this Bylaw.
“Large Scale Building Permit” means a permit for the construction of the following:
Building complexes such as apartment buildings, multiple residential developments,
or townhouses with more than five units;
A building that is designated for industrial, commercial, or institutional use;
A large structure where the building lot coverage is equal to or larger than 2000
square metres.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 3
“Large Woody Debris” means fallen trees, dead trees and snags, eroded root structures and logs
within a Conservation Area.
“Manager” means the Manager of Development and Environmental Services for the City of Maple
Ridge and his/her designate.
“Natural Causes” means death or decline of a tree as a result of natural diseases, pests, climatic
conditions, or inherent structural defects.
“Owner” means the registered owner or owners of a fee simple parcel of land, or the strata
corporation of a strata lot.
“Permit” means a permit issued by the Manager under the authority of this bylaw to cut or remove a
tree or trees.
“Permit Tree” means a tree that is 20 centimetres DBH or greater.
“Prune” or “pruning” means the selective cutting of living or dead branches of a tree consistent with
promoting the health and growth of the tree, as consistent with the International Society of
Arboriculture’s standards of arboriculture practice. This does not include topping of a tree.
“Public Utility” means a utility service provided by the City of Maple Ridge, BC Hydro, Telus, Terasen
Gas and any other company, utility or authority providing a public service or utility.
“Qualified Tree Risk Assessor” means a person who has a valid Tree Risk Assessment Qualification
as awarded by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA).
“Replacement Tree” means a tree required to be planted to replace a tree that has been cut or
damaged in accordance with this Bylaw.
“Rural Area” means areas of the City of Maple Ridge outside the Urban, Urban Reserve, and
Suburban Area boundaries as shown on Schedule “B” of the current Maple Ridge Official Community
Plan.
“Significant Tree” means a tree that is greater than 70 cm DBH; not including Cottonwood or Alder
species.
“Significant Tree Stand” means a stand of three or more Significant Trees with less than ten metres
between any two trees, and all vegetation within the outer dripline of that stand.
“Streamside Protection Regulations” means the watercourse setback protection methodology that is
adopted and used by the City for protecting watercourses, ponds, wetlands, and water features.
“Topping” means the removal of major portions of a tree crown by cutting branches to stubs or
cutting of the main leader or branches, and includes re-topping of previously topped trees.
“Tree Management Plan” means a plan prepared by a Certified Arborist or Registered Forester to
indicate the removal and retention of trees as per City requirements in Schedule “B”.
“Tree Protection Barrier” means a barrier erected to protect a tree and its roots from damage during
site work or construction; and as specified in Schedule “C” of this Bylaw.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
Page 4
“Tree Risk Assessment” means a written assessment prepared by a Qualified Tree Risk Assessor of
the risk of trees to persons and property using the most current International Society of Arboriculture
Tree Risk Assessment Standards and Tree Risk Assessment Qualification.
“Tree Survey Plan” means a survey plan prepared by a registered BC Land Surveyor. The plan
illustrates the location of trees in relation to the property lines of a lot, along with the size and
species of each tree, plus any other information required for the purpose of assessing a Permit
application.
“Urban and Suburban Area” means the areas of land designated as “Urban Residential”, “Estate
Suburban Residential”, “Suburban Residential”, “Urban Reserve”, “Commercial”, “Industrial” and
“Institutional” on Schedule “B” of the current Maple Ridge Official Community Plan,.
“Vulnerable Aquifer” means an aquifer that has been provincially designated as high vulnerability by
the BC Water Resource Atlas and aquifers identified in the Aquifers Map Figure 7 in the Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan, Bylaw No. 7060-2014.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 5
4.Prohibitions
4.1 No person shall cut or damage or cause or permit the cutting or damaging of a Permit Tree
without first obtaining a Permit.
4.2 No person shall cut or damage or permit to be cut or damage a tree in the Heritage Tree
Protection Area without first obtaining a Permit and written confirmation that the tree is a
Hazard Tree.
4.3 No person shall cut or damage or permit to be cut or damaged a tree in a Conservation Area
without first obtaining a Permit and written confirmation from a Qualified Tree Risk Assessor
that the tree is a Hazard Tree.
4.4 No person shall cut or damage or permit to be cut or damaged a Significant Tree and a tree
and all vegetation within a Significant Tree Stand without first obtaining a Permit.
4.5 No person shall cut or damage or permit to be cut or damaged a tree that is on a highway, park
or land owned by the City unless the work is undertaken by or on behalf of the City.
4.6 Without limiting sections 4.1 to 4.5, no person shall carry out any of the following activities in
respect of any tree protected by those sections without a Permit or contrary to a Permit issued
pursuant to this bylaw:
a. topping so as to significantly alter a tree’s natural canopy except if the tree forms part of a
hedge;
b. cutting or damaging the roots within the Critical Root Zone of a tree;
c. operating or storing heavy equipment within the Critical Root Zone of a tree;
d. placing fill, building materials, asphalt or erecting a structure within the Critical Root Zone
of a tree;
e. stripping bark, gouging or otherwise damaging the trunk of a tree;
f. depositing, within the Critical Root Zone of a tree, concrete washout or other liquids
harmful to the health of a tree;
g. removing soil from within the Critical Root Zone of a tree; and
h. undermining the roots within the Critical Root Zone of a tree.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 6
5.Exemptions
5.1 No Permit is required to cut a tree for which a Permit is required under section 4 where:
a.Cutting is undertaken by or on behalf of the City on park, highway or land owned or held
by the City;
b.Cutting is undertaken by a public utility for the purpose of safety, maintenance or
operation of the public utility’s infrastructure following standard arboricultural
practices;
c.Pruning is required to ensure the health and sustainability of the tree following
standard arboricultural practices;
d.The tree is an alder or a poplar tree (including a cottonwood) located in the Rural Area,
outside of a Conservation Area and provided that:
i) not more than 10 Permit Trees have been cut on the parcel in the previous
twelve months; and
ii)40 trees per hectare (16 trees/acre) are being retained on the parcel.
e.Cutting of no more than 10 trees in any twelve month period on parcels greater than
half a hectare in the Rural Area; provided that there remains 40 trees per hectare over
20 cm DBH on the parcel, and the trees being cut are not over 70 cm DBH.;
f.The tree is a Hazard Tree;
g.The cutting is permitted by statute;
h.Trees that are being cut for survey lines less than 2 metres wide, and the trees are less
than 30 centimetres DBH; and
i.Cutting is required for construction, improvement, repair or maintenance of public
works or services undertaken by a government authority.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 7
6.Permits
6.1 An application for a Permit or an amendment to a Permit shall:
a)be submitted to the Manager;
b)include a completed and signed application form as set out in Schedule “D”;
c)include all required plans and approvals in accordance with Section 7 of this Bylaw; and
d)be accompanied by the applicable Permit fee in accordance with the Maple Ridge
Development Application Fees Bylaw No. 5949-2001.
6.2 Subject to Section 12 of this Bylaw, after reviewing an application for a Permit, the Manager
may do any of the following:
a) issue a Permit which may impose terms and conditions in accordance with this Bylaw;
b) refuse to issue a Permit and provide written notice of the reasons for refusal within 15
days of the date of refusal.
6.3 The Owner who is subject to a decision of the Manager to grant or refuse a Permit, or to
impose conditions on the granting of a Permit is entitled to appeal to Council to have the
decision reconsidered. An application for reconsideration must be made in writing to the City
Clerk. There is no fee for an appeal application for reconsideration.
6.4 When a Permit authorizes a tree to be Cut, cutting shall be undertaken in compliance with the
conditions imposed by this Bylaw and the Permit.
6.5 All work authorized by a Permit shall be conducted by the Owner or by a tree service company
that has a valid business license to work within the City of Maple Ridge.
6.6 A Permit in respect of a Significant Tree or a tree in a Significant Tree Stand shall not be issued
unless one of the following circumstances applies:
a)The tree is a Hazard Tree;
b)The land use and density permitted under the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw cannot be
undertaken on the parcel in accordance with all the provisions of the Zoning bylaw without
the cutting of the tree;
c)The tree is within 2 metres of an existing building foundation wall;
d)The tree is causing structure or infrastructure damage as determined by the City or a
qualified professional engineer with the approval of the City;
e)A Permit related to subdivision or building has been issued and identifies tree removal and
protection areas in an approved Tree Management Plan as per Schedule “B” or an Arborist
Report as per Schedule “F”;
f)The Cutting of the tree is required to site a building, driveway, septic field, roadway, or
utility corridor as approved by the City prior to issuance of a building permit;
g)The tree is on a lot zoned for agricultural use, with active farm status or a Farm Plan that
shows that the tree will interfere with the best use of the land for agricultural purposes;
and
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 8
h)More than 50% of Significant Trees on the parcel shall be retained where possible and
there will be a minimum of 40 Permit Trees per hectare (16 trees/acre) retained.
6.7 For the purpose of calculating whether a parcel retains 40 Permit Trees per hectare under
section 6.6(h), there will be credit granted for the retention of trees on the parcel as per the
table below where the number in the right column indicates how many Replacement Trees
each retained tree of specified size in the left column equals:
DBH of trees to be retained # of Tree Credits
20cm - 50 cm 1 tree
50cm – 70 cm 3 trees
More than 70 cm 6 trees
6.8 All Owners and contractors shall ensure that all tree work is performed in a safe manner as
outlined in WorkSafe BC regulations and International Society of Arboriculture Best
Management Practices.
6.9 A Permit is valid for a period of four months from the date of issuance. Application for
amendments to the Permit can be made within the four month period.
6.10 A Permit may be revoked by the Manager if the terms and conditions of the Permit have been
breached or the information supplied by the applicant is determined to be inaccurate,
incomplete or erroneous.
Notice of Tree Cutting or Removal
6.11 Written notice of a Permit shall be posted on the parcel in respect of which the Permit has
been issued in a location visible to the public at least 24 hours prior to the commencement of
any tree cutting; and shall remain posted on the parcel until the completion of the work. The
notice shall provide the Permit number, address, number of trees to be removed, expiry date of
the Permit, a City contact number, and a map showing where trees are being removed.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
Page 9
7. Plans and Conditions
Where an application for a Permit is required by this Bylaw, the application must contain the following
information:
a. Proposed planting plan for required Replacement Trees in accordance with Schedule ‘E’
with security deposit required by section 9.7 of this Bylaw;
b. Any applicable Federal or Provincial submissions for approvals, including a Bird Nesting
Survey if removing trees between March 15 and August 1 as per the Wildlife Act (British
Columbia) and its regulations;
c. Tree Management Plan, in accordance with Schedule “B”; where:
(i) the parcel is subject to a permit application related to development,
(ii) more than 20 Permit trees are proposed to be cut; or
(iii) clearing more than 500 square metres of land.
d. Arborist Report, in accordance with Schedule “F”, where
(i) the parcel is subject to a development permit application and 20 or less Permit
Trees are proposed to be cut; or
(ii) the parcel is in the Rural Area on a parcel greater than 0.5 hectares and between
11 and 20 Permit Trees less than 70cm are proposed to be cut;
(iii) the parcel is in the Urban and Suburban Area or the parcel is less than 0.5 ha in
the Rural Area and more than 5 Permit Trees between 20 and 50cm DBH are
proposed to be cut; or
(iv) one or more Significant Trees are proposed to be cut.
e. Where tree removals will be within 50 metres of a watercourse or slopes over 25%, a
survey prepared by a B.C. Land Surveyor that identifies top-of-bank or top of ravine bank,
along with watercourse setbacks and geotechnical setbacks approved by the City will need
to be identified and prepared by a B.C. Land Surveyor on the ground and in a legal survey
plan.
8. Tree Cutting
A person cutting a tree must:
a. dispose of the tree parts in a manner approved by the City and in accordance with
Provincial and City regulations;
b. keep the Drainage System free of Excessive Suspended Solids Discharge originating from
the tree cutting area, as per the Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection Bylaw No. 6410-
2006;
c. stabilize all bare and exposed soil by Oct. 15 of any given year in order to reduce potential
erosion impacts in accordance with City regulations;
d. restrict all tree cutting work to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Saturday,
excluding holidays;
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 10
On parcels on which the applicant proposes to cut more than 20 Permit Trees or all trees
within an area of 500 square metres or more:
e.cut trees between August 1 and October 15, unless an erosion control plan prepared by a
Qualified Professional in accordance with the current Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection
Bylaw has been approved by the City and implemented prior to site disturbance; and,
f.obtain a bird nesting survey prepared and submitted by a Qualified Professional Biologist if
cutting trees between April 15 and August 1;
Conservation Area:
g.when cutting a Hazard Tree, within a Conservation Area, leave the larger pieces of the tree
as Large Woody Debris and leave the cut tree stump at a safe habitat height in order to
retain fish and wildlife habitat;
9.Replacement Trees
9.1 Where a person cuts a tree for which a Permit is required under this Bylaw, the owner of the
parcel on which the tree was located shall install Replacement Trees in accordance with
Schedule E.
9.2 An owner shall maintain Replacement Trees in good health in accordance with standard
arboricultural practice.
9.3 A person shall provide Replacement Trees as per Schedule “E” and approved by the City
Arborist in respect of trees unlawfully cut on highways and City-owned lands.
Cash in Lieu Option
9.4 If an owner determines it is not feasible or desirable to provide Replacement Trees on the
same parcel on which the trees were cut, the Owner shall provide to the City a cash-in-lieu
payment for each required Replacement Tree not replaced on the parcel into the City Tree
Fund in accordance with Schedule ‘E’.
9.5 Replacement Trees of all sizes cannot be cut without a Permit.
9.6 Trees that were planted as part of a landscaping plan pursuant to a Development Permit for
multi-family and commercial units shall require an Arborist report as per Schedule ‘F’, and a
phased removal and replanting plan approved by the City in accordance with the intention of
the original Development Permit landscape plan.
Security Deposits for Replanting
9.7 Prior to the issuance of any Permit, the Owner shall provide the City with a refundable security
deposit in cash or irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $425.00 per Replacement Tree
to a maximum of $17,000 per hectare and a maximum of $100,000 per application.
9.8 The security required under section 9.7 shall be held by the City for one year from the date a
Replacement Tree is planted, and shall thereafter be released to the Owner provided that the
Manager is satisfied that the Owner has complied with the tree replacement criteria and has
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
Page 11
maintained the Replacement Tree in good health for one year from the date of planting. No
interest shall be paid by the City on security deposits.
9.9 If the Owner has not complied with the tree replacement criteria as outlined in this Bylaw, the
City may use the security provided under section 9.7 to meet the replacement conditions
specified in the Permit.
10. Tree Protection and Mitigation Requirements
10.1 Where the Critical Root Zone of any tree to be retained, either on the parcel or on an
adjacent parcel is within 5 metres of any excavation, demolition, construction or engineering
works, the owner must install a Tree Protection Barrier around the tree.
10.2 No work authorized by a demolition permit, building permit, or tree permit shall commence
before all Tree Protection Barriers required by this Bylaw have been installed and approved
by the Manager.
10.3 No subdivision servicing works shall be permitted before the Tree Protection Barrier has
been installed and approved by the Manager.
10.4 Tree Protection Barriers shall remain in accordance with Schedule “C” until all construction is
completed and a final completion certificate or final occupancy permit is issued by the City.
10.5 The Owner shall protect all land dedicated or transferred to the City, and all covenanted
conservation lands on the parcel, by erecting a fence, as per the specifications in Schedule
“C” around that dedicated or transferred land prior to any development. The on-site clearing
or removal of any vegetation, the alteration of on-site grades, and the removal or deposition
of soil from or to this dedicated or transferred land is prohibited.
11. Administration and Enforcement
11.1 The Manager, the Environmental Technician, a Bylaw Enforcement Officer and all City
employees under their direction will have the right at all reasonable hours to enter upon and
inspect any land or premises in the City to determine if the provisions of the Bylaw are being
met.
11.2 The Manager may suspend work carried out under a Permit or in violation of this Bylaw if the
work is not being undertaken in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Permit or
this Bylaw.
12. Offense and Penalty
12.1 Every person who violates any provision of this Bylaw or who suffers or permits any act or
thing to be done in contravention of this Bylaw commits an offence against this Bylaw and is
liable to the penalties hereby imposed.
12.2 Every person who commits an offence against this Bylaw is liable to a fine and penalty of not
more than $10,000.00 for each offence.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 12
12.3 Where more than one tree is cut or damaged in violation of this bylaw a separate offense is
committed with respect to each tree.
12.4 Each day that a violation exists or continues shall constitute a separate offense.
12.5 When a tree has been cut or damaged in violation of this Bylaw, the Owner shall submit a
complete Permit Application and the applicable fee, a post-cutting assessment fee, plus a
refundable security deposit for Replacement Trees in cash or letter of credit in the amount
specified on the Permit or penalty notice. When a post-cutting assessment does not provide
evidence satisfactory to the City of the size of the tree cut or damaged, the tree shall be
deemed to be > 70 cm DBH for the purpose of providing Replacement Trees.
12.6 If work not in compliance with Permit conditions is proceeding, a stop work order shall be
posted on the parcel, and no further work shall take place on the parcel until the work is in
compliance with the conditions of the Permit.
12.7 Any owner who cuts or damages, or suffers or permits any tree to be cut, or damaged in
contravention of this Bylaw or in violation of any terms and conditions of a Permit shall be
required to submit a Permit application (including appropriate fees and securities) for the
trees cut or damaged and to replace trees on the same parcel in accordance with Schedule
“E”.
12.8 If an owner fails or refuses to plant the required replacement trees as specified on the Permit
or in the Replacement Planting Criteria in Schedule “E”, within ninety (90) days of receiving
written direction from the City to do so, the City may use the security collected to either have
the trees planted on the Owner’s parcel or to plant the trees on City-owned property.
12.9 Where an owner fails to comply with section 9.1 or 12.5 of this Bylaw, the City may plant
Replacement Trees in accordance with Schedule ‘E’ of this Bylaw on the parcel on which
trees were cut and the Owner shall pay the City’s costs, which costs may be collected in the
same manner and with the same remedies as property taxes and if due and payable by
December 31 and unpaid on that date shall be deemed to be taxes in arrears.
13.If any section or lesser portion of this Bylaw is held invalid, it will be severed and the validity
of the remaining provisions of this will not be affected.
14.Schedules “A”, “B”, “C”, “D”, “E”, and “F” attached to this Bylaw are incorporated herein and
form part of the Bylaw.
READ a first time the day of , 2015.
READ a second time the day of , 2015.
READ a third time the day of , 2015.
ADOPTED the day of , 2015.
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
Page 13
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
SCHEDULE “A”
HERITAGE TREE PROTECTION AREA
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 14
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
SCHEDULE “B”
TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
For lands under development permit applications
And for tree permit applications proposing the removal of more than 20 trees
And for tree permit applications proposing the clearing of more than 500 square metres
Applicants shall provide a comprehensive Tree Management Plan prepared by a Certified Arborist or
registered Forester and approved by the City before any trees are cut. This Plan is required to clarify
the intent with respect to protection, management, replacement and hazard assessment of trees
that are on and adjacent to the site.
A Tree Management Plan shall include the following:
1.Initial Tree Assessment to be prepared by a qualified professional forester or Certified Arborist.
The assessment and initial sketch plan shall include the following information:
i) the location, species, size (dbh) and number of Permit Trees to be removed within the
Developable Area where tree cutting is required or proposed;
ii)the location, species, size, age class, health condition, and number of Significant Trees
and Significant Tree Stands outside of Conservation Areas to be retained or removed
within the site where tree cutting, disruption or development activity is proposed;
iii) the location, species, age class, and health condition of Permit Trees identified for
retention or replacement on Developable Areas of the parcel. This includes:
Permit Trees within 10 metres of the property boundary line and Conservation Areas;
Permit Trees within 10 metres of Significant Trees, Heritage Tree Protection Areas, or
Significant Tree Stands where development activity and Tree Cutting is being proposed;
and
Permit trees within 10 metres of the existing or proposed building envelope footprint
including building structures, accessory buildings, servicing and infrastructure;
iv) location of the proposed development layout and/or building envelope layout including
existing or proposed structures, accessory buildings, services, and other infrastructure.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
Page 15
2. Tree Retention Plan to identify trees to be retained outside Conservation Areas using selective
clearing methods that demonstrates an intention to achieve the following:
retain trees along the perimeters of parcels with consideration for windfirm forest edges,
critical root zones, and privacy;
to minimize impacts to adjacent properties including consideration of retention of trees
to minimize impacts to groundwater, drainage, blowdown; and
to retain Significant Trees and Significant Tree Stands through appropriate development
or building layout siting and low impact design efforts.
A Tree Retention Plan shall include a complete description of proposed trees to be retained,
including the names (common and botanical names), locations, quantities, health condition, and size
in centimetres DBH of trees to be retained, and the Critical Root Zone for each retained tree.
3. Tree Protection Measures During Construction with recommendations for tree protection
measures and monitoring during construction, including consideration for grading, drainage,
irrigation, space, and placement of Tree Protection Barriers around the Critical Root Zone of
retained trees and trees located on property boundaries in accordance with Schedule D.
4. Tree Risk Assessment completed by a Qualified Tree Risk Assessor to identify all trees that are a
potential hazard to proposed development during and after construction. Tree Risk Assessments
shall be submitted to the City before construction begins and after construction is complete; and
will include trees within Conservation Areas or adjacent City-owned lands that are within 10
metres of proposed structures. All mitigation for risk of Hazard Trees identified in the report
shall be addressed and confirmed prior to final approval of the works under the Permit.
5. Replacement Planting Plan in accordance with Schedule “E”.
If the proposed development does not retain a ratio of 40 Permit Trees per hectare within the
Developable Area, then replacement trees are required. The replacement plan must identify
locations for re-planting, numbers of Replacement Trees, species and size of Replacement Trees,
or the cash-in-lieu total to be paid.
Trees to be retained within the Developable Area count as Replacement Trees. Size of retained
tree determines equivalent number of replacement trees, as per the following:
DBH of trees to be retained Replacement Credits
20cm - 50 cm 1 tree
50cm – 70 cm 3 trees
More than 70 cm 6 trees
6. Monitoring Schedule for tree retention and planting on the site during and after the construction.
A Certified Arborist must be retained as a monitor to ensure proper protection measures and
planting quality. Monitors may be requested by the City to report on issues that arise on site
throughout the construction phases.
7. Calculation of security amount on the planted and retained trees, to be paid by the applicant in
accordance with Schedule ‘E’. Each tree to be planted or retained requires $425 security; not to
exceed a total of $17,000 per hectare to a maximum of $100,000 per application. This security
shall be returned one year after the trees have been planted by the applicant with the
submission of a Certified Arborist report confirming the healthy condition of the trees, and
approved by the Manager.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 16
Other plans that are required as per the site conditions include:
8.Groundwater Impact Assessment as related to tree removals when removing more than 20
Permit Trees or clearing more than 500 square metre area over a Vulnerable Aquifer. The
assessment shall be prepared by a qualified hydrological professional.
9.Phased Clearing Plan, (except for farm use), if the area to be cleared has slopes over 15%, or is
on a Floodplain. The Plan will indicate how cutting will be phased to minimize the immediate
impacts of clearing.
10.Windfirm Assessment for clearing activity that will create a new forest edge; to address
blowdown risk and mitigation including tree removal, pruning and replacement
recommendations, and retention of Large Woody Debris within Conservation Areas. This
Assessment shall be prepared by a Registered Forester or a Certified Arborist with experience in
blowdown risk mitigation.
11.Detailed Tree Survey to be prepared by a registered BC Land Surveyor to indicate proposed tree
retention and replacement areas that require restrictive covenants. A BCLS survey will also be
required for location of trees to be cut within five (5) metres of property boundary lines,
Conservation Area boundaries, or areas with steep slopes over 25%.
All protection and mitigation measures shall be inspected and reported by the Certified Arborist, and
submitted to and approved by the City, before development work can begin on site.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
Page 17
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
SCHEDULE “C”
Tree Protection Specifications
Trees that are identified for protection through a Permit require the following protection measures to
be implemented if any demolition, construction or change of land grade will take place within 5
metres of the Critical Root Zone of the tree; and for all existing trees on the highway fronting the
parcel on which construction is to take place:
A protection barrier or temporary fence of at least 1.2 meters in height shall be placed around
the Critical Root Zone of the tree. This barrier shall be in place before any excavation or
construction work begins, and the barrier shall remain intact throughout the entire period of
construction.
Specifications for Construction:
1. 1.2 m (~4’) height;
2. 2"x 4"s to be used for vertical posts, top and bottom rails and cross-bracing (in an "X"); round, un-
treated vertical posts may be used with a minimum diameter of 9 cm;
3. Spacing between vertical posts to be a minimum of 3.7 m (12’) on center;
4. Structure shall be sturdy with vertical posts driven firmly into the ground;
5. Continuous plastic mesh high visibility screening (e.g. orange snow fencing);
6. Posted with visible all weather signage advising that encroachment inside the protected area is
forbidden;
7. Located at a distance from the tree based on the calculation of its Critical Root Zone.
The area within a Tree Protection Barrier shall remain undisturbed and not be used for any purpose
including storage, dumping, parking and machinery operation.
Any required excavation in and around the Critical Root Zone of a tree shall be approved by the City
and shall be completed by hand. (eg. underground servicing, footings, etc.) under the supervision of
a Certified Arborist.
Grades within the Critical Root Zone shall be maintained as original. Re-grading outside the Critical
Root Zone shall not negatively affect the drainage or the health of the retained trees. Trees within
the Critical Root Zone shall be adequately cared for throughout the construction process.
If trees within the Critical Root Zone are damaged beyond repair, the Owner shall provide 4
Replacement Trees for each tree damaged.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 18
SCHEDULE “C” con’t
Tree Protection Specifications
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 19
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
Schedule “D”
Tree Cutting Permit Application
1.Full name(s) and address of applicant:
Postal Code: home phone: cell:
Email:_____________________________________________________
2.Full name(s) and address of owner (if different than applicant):
Postal Code: Telephone:
Email: _____________________________________________
A consent form signed by the Owner must accompany this application if applicant and owner are not
the same.
3.Full name(s) of tree cutting company:
Telephone: ___________________ email: _________________________________
4.Property proposed for tree cutting:
Street Address:________________________________________________________
Or Legal Description: _____________________________________________________
5.Purpose of proposed tree cutting:
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
6.Number and Species of trees to be cut:
7.Drainage and erosion control methods to minimize impacts to adjacent lands or to nearby
watercourses from the tree removal site. Attach erosion control plan in accordance with the
Maple Ridge Watercourse Protection Bylaw No.6410-2006.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 20
8.Methods proposed to restore the site to a suitable condition, including appropriate disposal of
wood waste and stabilization of bare and exposed soil:
9. If trees to be removed are not affiliated with a subdivision or Large Scale Building Permit, then
attach a dimensional sketch of the parcel which shows the location of the trees to be cut, the
location of the trees to be protected, the location of barrier fencing, the location and species of
any required Replacement Trees, topographic and hydrological features, structures, roads and
other information useful in determining location.
10.A Tree Management Plan must accompany this application if tree cutting is taking place on
parcel that is under a development application, when cutting more than 20 trees; or when
clearing more than 500 square metres of land.
FEE: Applications for a permit shall be accompanied by the prescribed fee as set out in the Maple
Ridge Development Application Fees Bylaw No. 5949-2001.
I HEREBY DECLARE that the above information is correct, and that I have read a copy of the City of
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 and that I will abide by all the applicable
provisions of the said bylaw and such terms and conditions as may form part of any Tree Removal
Permit issued pursuant to this application.
Name of Applicant(s):
__________________________________________________________________
Signature of Applicant(s):
__________________________________________________________________
Date:_____________________________________
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 21
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
SCHEDULE ‘E’
REPLACEMENT TREE CRITERIA
The criteria below applies to the replacement of trees required under Section 9 of the City of Maple
Ridge Tree Management Bylaw. The Bylaw sets a target of 40 trees per hectare (16 trees per acre) to
be on every site within the Developable Area of the parcel.
Size of Tree
Removed cm
DBH
Replacement Requirement per tree
removed
Retention requirement or cash-in-
lieu
0-20 1 in Conservation Areas N/A
20-50 2 in Conservation Areas or if not
retaining 40/ha (16/acre)
40 trees/ha (16/acre) or $425 per
replacement tree
50-70 4 in Conservation Areas or if not
retaining 40/ha (16/acre)
40 trees/ha (16/acre) or $425 per
replacement tree
>70 6 in all areas $425 per replacement tree
Notwithstanding the above, Replacement Trees will NOT be a requirement:
1.When the parcel is being actively used for agricultural uses –with farm status or with a
proposed Farm Plan reviewed by the City;
2.When the tree being removed is dead;
3. On parcels that are retaining a minimum of 40 Permit Trees per hectare (16/acre) outside of
Conservation Areas, provided that the trees being removed are < 70 cm DBH.
City Tree Fund
If trees cannot be replaced on the same parcel, the Owner shall pay cash in lieu of $425 per
Replacement Tree; to a maximum of $17,000 per hectare. The cash compensation will be placed in
a City Tree Fund and will be used to plant trees on public and private lands to replace tree canopy
lost and for the promotion and stewardship of maintaining a healthy tree canopy in the community.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
Page 22
SCHEDULE ‘E’ con’t
Trees to be retained count as Replacement Trees if they are not in Conservation Areas
The size of a retained tree determines how many Replacement Trees it equals, as per the following:
DBH of trees to be retained Replacement Credits
20cm - 50 cm 1 tree
50cm – 70 cm 3 trees
More than 70 cm 6 trees
Species and Size:
Replacement Trees shall be a species proposed by the Owner and approved by the City and shall
meet the current BC Landscape and Nursery Standards for quality of plants, spacing and installation.
Replacement Trees
For sites under a rezoning, subdivision or building permit shall be a minimum of 6 cm DBH at
time of planting for deciduous trees and 2 metres in height for coniferous trees;
for residential non-development sites shall be a minimum 4 cm DBH or 10 gallon pot size for
deciduous trees and 1.5 metres in height for coniferous trees.
Two small stature trees (mature height of less than 10 metres) are required to equal one
large stature tree (mature height over 10 metres).
Location and Spacing:
In determining the location of Replacement Trees, the Owner shall consider the mature space
requirements for the species and shall not plant trees within 3 metres of a building foundation wall
or within 1.5 metres of a property line.
Proposed locations must be approved by the City Arborist.
Time of Replacement Planting:
Where no construction or site disturbance is proposed that would affect the planting of Replacement
Trees, the Replacement Trees shall be planted within ninety (90) days of the date of tree removal or
of the issuance of a notice of compliance from the City.
Where construction or site disturbance is proposed within 10 metres of the Replacement Tree
installation, the tree shall be planted within ninety (90) days of the end of construction.
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015 Page 23
Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw No. 7133-2015
SCHEDULE ‘F’
ARBORIST REPORT
An Arborist Report is required for a Permit as per Section 7(d) in the following instances:
(i) the parcel is subject to a development permit application and 20 or fewer Permit Trees are
proposed to be cut;
(ii) the parcel is in the Rural Area and between 11 and 20 trees are proposed to be cut; or
(iii) the parcel is in the Urban and Suburban Area and more than 5 trees are proposed to be
cut
(iv) the tree to be Cut is a Significant Tree.
The Arborist Report shall include the following:
1.Tree Assessment which identifies:
a.The location, species, size DBH and health conditions of Permit Trees proposed to be
removed from the parcel;
b.The location, species, size DBH and health conditions of Permit Trees proposed to be
retained or replaced within 10 metres of property boundary lines, Conservation Area
boundaries, or proposed building footprints including infrastructure;
c.The location, species, size DBH and health conditions of any Significant Trees being
retained or removed within the proposed building envelopes; and
d.The locations of any park boundaries, conservation or setback areas on the parcel
along with existing or proposed building layout and infrastructure.
2.Replacement Plan If the proposed cutting activity does not retain a ratio of 40 Permit Trees
per hectare within the Developable Area of the parcel, then Replacement Trees are required.
The replacement plan must identify locations for re-planting, numbers of Replacement Trees,
species and size of Replacement Trees, or the cash-in-lieu total to be paid.
3.Protection and Mitigation Plan which details mitigation and protection measures that will be
in place to avoid or reduce negative impacts to protected trees on the parcel and on
neighbouring parcels. This plan shall include measures to protect Critical Root Zones and to
address blowdown concerns, drainage issues and Hazard Trees.
4.Final Tree Survey to be prepared by a registered BC Land Surveyor of proposed tree retention
and replacement areas that require restrictive covenants. A BCLS survey will also be
required for location of trees to be cut along property boundary lines, or within 5 metres of
Conservation Area boundaries, or areas with steep slopes over 25%.
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7191-2015
A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw
No. 6929-2012 as amended.
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule 25 of the Maple Ridge Ticket Information
Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw
No. 7191-2015."
2. Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No 6929-2012 is hereby amended by
deleting SCHEDULE 25 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
Schedule 25
Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012
From Maple Ridge Tree Management Bylaw 7133-2015
Offence Section Fine
Remove tree without permit 4.1 $1000
Remove Significant Tree without permit 4.4 $5000
Cut or damage tree on City owned land 4.5 $500
Damage tree 4.6 $500
Fail to comply with permit conditions 6.4 $1000
Fail to post notice of Permit 6.11 $500
Dispose of tree parts contrary to regulations 8.a $500
Fail to keep drainage system free 8.b $500
Fail to stabilize bare soil 8.c $500
Work outside of permitted hours 8.d $200
Clear cut trees without ESC plan 8.e $500
Cut trees without nesting survey 8.f $500
Fail to leave tree debris in Conservation Area 8.g $1000
Fail to comply with replacement requirement 9.1 $1000
Cut replacement tree without Permit 9.4 $500
Fail to comply with Tree Protection Requirements 10 $1000
Fail to comply with Stop Work Order 12.6 $500
APPENDIX B
READ a first time the day of , 2015.
READ a second time the day of , 2015 .
READ a third time the day of ,2015 .
ADOPTED, the day of , 2015.
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Amending Bylaw No. 7192-2015
A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Bylaw
No. 5949-2001 as amended.
___________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Bylaw
No. 5949 - 2001;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Amending Bylaw
No. 7192-2015."
2. Maple Ridge Development Application Fee Bylaw No. 5949 - 2001 is hereby amended
by:
a) deleting Section O in Schedule ‘A’ in its entirety and renumber subsequent sections
accordingly; and
b) adding the following section in Schedule ‘A’ as Section P
TREE CUTTING PERMIT (see Bylaw 7133-2015)
(a) trees in Urban Area and Urban Reserve
and Rural parcels less than 0.5 ha $50 for first tree + $25 each additional tree
(b) trees in the Rural Area on
parcels greater than 0.5 hectares $50 for 11th tree + $25 each additional tree
(c) Development & large scale clearing $200 base fee + $25 per tree
(d) tree replacement $425 per tree
(e) parcels with active farm use $0
READ a first time the day of , 2015.
READ a second time the day of , 2015 .
READ a third time the day of ,2015 .
ADOPTED, the day of , 2015.
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
- 1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-130-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Rezoning – First Extension
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No.6891-2011
12240 228 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant for the above referenced file has applied for an extension to this rezoning application
under Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. This application is to rezone the subject
property located at 12240 228 Street (see Appendix A and B) to the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential
District) zone to permit a future subdivision into approximately 4 single family lots no less than 292
m2 in area. Pursuant with Council resolution, this application is exempt from the CAC program, due
to it being presented at public hearing and subsequently received third reading.
RECOMMENDATION:
That a one year extension be granted for rezoning application 2011-130-RZ and that the following
conditions be addressed prior to consideration of final reading:
i.Road dedication as required;
ii.Removal of the existing buildings; and
iii.A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether
there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If so, a Stage 1 Site
Investigation report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated
site.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Mangal Sindhar
Owner: Tanbir Sindhar
1106
- 2 -
Legal Description: Lot 3, Section 20, Township 12, NWD Plan 13667
OCP:
Existing: Single Family Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Single Family Residential
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
Designation: Single Family Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Single Family Residential
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Ground-Oriented Multi-Family
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 0.141 hectares (0.35 acres)
Access: Proposed lane
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
Companion Applications: 2011-130-SD, 2011-130-DP
The following dates outline Council’s consideration of the application and Zone Amending Bylaw No.
6891-2011:
First reading was granted on February 14, 2012
Second reading was granted on October 14, 2014 (see Appendix C)
Public Hearing was held November 18, 2014
Third reading was granted November 25, 2014
- 3 -
Application Progress:
Given that the application conditions cannot be satisfied before the expiry date, the applicant has
applied for an extension. The applicant has worked hard to complete most of the terms and
conditions to be met prior to final reading of Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6891-2011. The major
outstanding item is the demolition of the existing building. Pursuant with Council resolution, this
application is exempt from the CAC program, due to it being presented at public hearing and
subsequently received third reading
Alternatives:
Council may choose one of the following alternatives:
1.Grant the request for extension;
2.Deny the request for extension; or
3.Repeal third reading of the bylaw and refer the bylaw to Public Hearing.
CONCLUSION:
The applicant has been actively pursuing the completion of this rezoning application and has applied
for a one year extension.
“Original signed by Therese Melser”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Therese Melser
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Second Reading Report
City of PittMeadows
District ofLangley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Oct 2, 2014 2011-130-RZ BY: JV
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
P LA N NIN G DE P A R T M E N T
1226122792
12182
12208
12276
12306
12316
2282412265
12298
2288122881228802291112191
12201
12211
12166
12278
12296
228062281212287
12301
12192
12308
2291212303
12255
12195
228712291012313
12161
12293 12275
12313
12224
12238
12258
228752287422873228782289712287
12253
2281822871228702288322902229132292012288
12183
12203
12229
12243
12273
12194
12240
12274 22872228912277212313
12258
12167
1218522836 228822291412301 12304
12314
12169 2283312180
12278
228802288522908228 ST.EAGLE AVE.
122 AVE.
122 AVE.FULTON ST.ROGERS AVE.228 ST.GREENWELL ST.STOREY AVE.
79
2 1
11
P 813963
3 P 13667P 44214P 5724151
P 41773
216
P 71970
334
P 11200Rem. 64
81
P 40082
12
10
75' of 1
P 44396304
4
352
113 114
103
115
104
93
67
105
279
P 14396
Rem 2
8
222
9
1BCP 21032
332
1
2
P 45078
353
333
215
58 59
54
S 1/2 10
280
333P 25555
6
P 62578
P 57607 10
A
P 4836
308
P 41774
91 92
P 41773
339
308
P 42772336 P 25555P 21837Rem. N
Rem. 1
288
212
213
52
128
53
217
129
1162
340
PARK
82
BCP 23946P 14396P 45792
114
BCS 569
A
309
RP 16335P 26692290
307
211
P 44873
291
79
127
102
57
N 1/2 10
1
83 113
9
4
P 51413
P 43105
289
6
292
126
65
56
80
P 11845
P 58171
78
P 82923
303
P 13667
214
66
P 44292
94
68
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:1,500
12240-228 St
APPENDIX A
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Oct 2, 2014 FILE: 2011-130-RZ BY: PC
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
District of Maple Ridge´
Scale: 1:1,500
12240 228 STREET
SKRWRJUDSK\LPDJH
APPENDIX B
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: October 6, 2014
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-130-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Second Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6891-2011
12240 228 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 12240 228 Street, from
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), to permit a future
subdivision into four single family lots, no less than 292 m2 (3143 ft2) in area. The proposed R-3
(Special Amenity Residential District) zoning complies with the Town Centre Area Plan in the Official
Community Plan (OCP). This application received first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6891-
2011 on February 14, 2012.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1.That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6891-2011 be given second reading, and be
forwarded to Public Hearing;
2.That Council require, as a condition of subdivision approval, the developer to pay to the Distri ct
an amount that equals 5% of the market value of the land, as determined by an independent
appraisal, in lieu of parkland dedication in accordance with Section 941 of the Local
Government Act; and,
3.That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final r eading:
i.Road dedication as required;
ii.Removal of the existing building s; and
iii.A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising
whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If so, a Stage 1 Site
Investigation report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a
contaminated site.
APPENDIX C
- 2 -
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Mangal Sindhar
Owner: Tanbir Sindhar
Legal Description: Lot: 3, Section: 20, Township: 12, NWD Plan: 13667
OCP:
Existing: Single Family Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Single Family Residential
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
Designation: Single Family Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Single Family Residential
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Ground-Oriented Multi-Family
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 0.141 hectares (0.35 acres)
Access: proposed lane
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
Companion Applications: 2011-130-SD, 2011-130-DP
- 3 -
b)Project Description:
The subject property is located at the northeast corner of 122 Avenue and 228 Street and is
relatively flat (see Appendix A). The applicant proposes to rezone and subdivide the subject property
into four single family lots. Three lots will front onto 228 Street, and the fourth lot will front onto 122
Avenue. Each newly created lot will have a detached carport or garage, and all four lots will be
accessed via a lane running north-south. The form and character of this intensive single-family
residential development will be regulated through a Development Permit which will be the subject of
a future report to Council. The applicant has submitted building elevations for the proposed homes.
c)Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan :
The subject property is designated Single Family Residential in the Town Centre Area Plan, Section
10.4 of the OCP. This designation provides options for increasing density and choice of housing
form, while retaining the single family character in established neighbourhood blocks. The R-3
(Special Amenity Residential District) zone is compatible with this designation. This development will
create a more compact single family development pattern along 228 Street, while providing a
transition in density from multi-family housing on the west side of 228 Street to the larger single
family lots outside of the Town Centre Area Plan to the east. The current proposal is consistent with
the following policies of the Town Centre Area Plan:
Policy 5-9 Maple Ridge will encourage the retention of laneways and the creation of new
laneways should be considered, where appropriate and feasible.
Policy 5-10 Laneways should have a maximum paved width of 6 metres.
Policy 5-11 Access to both underground and surface parking areas is encouraged to be
provided off a laneway.
A new lane will be constructed as part of the development, and will have a paved width of six metres
(19.7 ft). The lane will serve to reduce the number of driveway accesses from 228 Street, which is
categorized as a Collector Standard Road.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property, from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) to permit future subdivision into four single
family lots (see Appendix B). This proposal is in compliance with the requirements of the R-3
(Special Amenity Residential District) zone, which are: a minimum lot area of 213 m2 (2,293 ft2), a
minimum lot width of 7.9 metres (25.9 ft), and a minimum length of 27 metres (88.6 ft).
- 4 -
Proposed Variances:
A Development Variance Permit will be required for the Subdivision and Development Servicing
Bylaw No. 4800-1993 to allow for the reduced lane right-of-way from 7.5 metres (24.6 ft) to 6
metres (19.7 ft). The paved width will have a maximum width of six (6) metres to comply with the
policies of the Town Centre Area Plan to achieve an urban, walkable pedestrian-focused
development. Additionally, the applicant has requested a variance for a reduction in the distance of
the driveway from the intersection for proposed lot 3 (see Appendix C). The Zoning Bylaw requires a
minimum distance of 7.5 metres (24.6 ft), however the applicant has requested a relaxation for this
amount. The requested variances will be the subject of a future report to Council.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.8 of the OCP, an Intensive Residential Development Permit application is
required to ensure the current proposal provides emphasis on high standards in aesthetics and
quality of the built environment, while protecting important qualities of the natural environment.
The applicant has submitted four different housing designs to ensure that the styles are not
repeated along the 228 Street streetscape (see Appendix D). The materials include hardi-plank,
hardi-shingle, and stone. The proposed hardi board colours include beige s and browns, blues,
greens and greys. A carport will be provided as a detached parking structure accessed from the rear
lane, and the front yards will be landscaped with small shrubs. Compliance with the key guidelines
of the Intensive Residential Development Permit application will be the subject of a future report to
Council.
d) Parkland Requirement:
As there are more than two additional lots proposed to be created, the developer will be required to
comply with the park dedication requirements of Section 941 of the Local Government Act prior to
subdivision approval.
For this project, no parkland is required from the subject property; therefore it is recommended that
Council require the developer to pay to the District an amount that equals the market value of 5% of
the land required for parkland purposes. The amount payable to the District in lieu of park
dedication must be derived by an independent appraisal at the developer’s expense. Council
consideration of the cash-in-lieu amount will be the subject of a future Council report.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has reviewed this development and has determined that all off-site
services exist for the rezoning application requirements, therefore a Rezoning Servicing Agreement
is not required. All on-site service improvements will be necessary prior to subdivision approval.
- 5 -
CONCLUSION:
As the subject application is in compliance with the policies of the Town Centre Area Plan, it is
recommended that second reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6891-2011
and that application 2011-130-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing.
It is further recommended that Council require, as a condition of subdivision approval, the developer
to pay to the District an amount that equals 5% of the market value of the land, as determined by an
independent appraisal, in lieu of parkland dedication.
"Original signed by Amelia Bowden"
_____________________________________________
Prepared by: Amelia Bowden
Planning Technician
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
"Original signed by Frank Quinn"
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
"Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6891-2011
Appendix C – Subdivision Plan
Appendix D – Building Elevations
Appendix E – Landscape Plan
- 1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2013-039-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Rezoning – First Extension
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7121-2014 and
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7022-2013
20208 McIvor Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant for the above noted file has applied for an extension to this rezoning application under
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. This application is to permit future subdivision into
13 single family residential lots under the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
zone. Pursuant with Council direction, this application is exempt from the Community Amenity
Contribution (CAC) program because it has been presented at Public Hearing and subsequently
received third reading.
RECOMMENDATION:
That a one year extension be granted for rezoning application 2013-039-RZ and that the following
conditions be addressed prior to consideration of final reading:
i.Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the
deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;
ii.Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure;
iii.Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedules "B" and “C”;
iv. Park dedication as required;
v.Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the geotechnical report, which addresses the
suitability of the subject property for the proposed development;
vi. Registration of a Statutory Right-of-Way plan and agreement for sanitary sewer;
vii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether
there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject property. If so, a
Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject property is not a
contaminated site; and
1107
- 2 -
viii.Registration of Archaeological Report, prepared by Antiquus Archaeological Consultants
Ltd., dated September 6, 2013, with the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource
Operations, Archaeological Branch.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd.
Owner: Maridge Properties Ltd.
Legal Description: Lot 1 District Lots 263 and 246 Group 1 New
Westminster District Plan 21483
OCP:
Existing: Agricultural
Proposed: Urban Residential; Conservation
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential, Neighbourhood Park, Conservation
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
West: Use: Golf Course (City of Pitt Meadows)
Zone: Unknown
Designation: Unknown
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential and Conservation
Site Area: 1.8 ha (4.6 acres)
Access: Allison Street, 201 Street, Davenport Drive
Servicing: Urban Standard
The following dates outline Council’s consideration of the application and Bylaws 7121-2014 and
7022-2013:
First reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No.7022-2013 was considered and granted on
September 24, 2013;
- 3 -
Second reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7022-2013 and first and second reading for
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7121-2014 was considered and granted
November 25, 2014;
Public Hearing was held December 9, 2014; and
Third reading was considered and granted December 9, 2014.
Application Progress:
The applicant has completed most of the terms and conditions to be met prior to final reading of the
Zone Amending Bylaw. It was identified that relocation of the sanitary trunk sewer may be required
before moving forward with this application. The relocation is in the process of being resolved
through the Engineering Department and it is the applicant’s intention to pursue final reading within
the one year extension period.
Alternatives:
Council may choose one of the following alternatives:
1.Grant the request for extension;
2.Deny the request for extension; or
3.Repeal third reading of the bylaw and refer the bylaw to Public Hearing.
CONCLUSION:
The applicant has applied for a one year extension to the subject rezoning application in order to
provide an additional year to complete the project. The relocation of the sanitary trunk sewer is in
the process of being resolved; therefore, it is recommended that a one year extension be granted for
rezoning application 2013-039-RZ, and that the terms and conditions outlined in this report be
addressed prior to consideration of final reading.
“Original signed by Adam Rieu”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adam Rieu
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Chuck Goddard” for
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Second Reading Report
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Aug 27, 2013 FILE: 2013-039-RZ BY: PC
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,000
20208 MCIVOR AVENUE
APPENDIX A
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Nov 17, 2015
FILE: 2013-039-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT´
Scale: 1:2,000
20208 MCIVOR AVENUE
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2011
SUBJECT PROPERTY
APPENDIX B
City of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 17, 2014
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2013-039-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7121-2014
Second Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7022-2013
20208 McIvor Avenue
A)EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 20208 McIvor Avenue,
from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential),
to permit a future subdivision of approximately 13 single family lots. An Official Community Plan
(OCP) amendment is required to change the designation from Agricultural to Urban Residential and
Conservation; to include the subject property in the Urban Area Boundary on Schedule B; and to
amend Schedule C to designate lands around a tributary to Katzie Slough as Conservation. Council
granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7022-2013 and considered the early
consultation requirements for the OCP amendment on September 24, 2013.
B)RECOMMENDATIONS:
1.That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7121-2014 be given first and second
readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
2.That, in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and
on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7121-2014 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a
Development Information Meeting (DIM), and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any
further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw;
3.That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No . 7121-2014 be considered in conjunction
with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
4.That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7121-2014 is
consistent with the Capital Expenditu re Plan and Waste Management Plan;
5.That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7022-2013 be given second reading, and be forwarded to
Public Hearing;
APPENDIX C
- 2 -
6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of
the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;
ii. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure;
iii. Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedules "B" and “C”;
iv. Park dedication as required ;
v. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the geotechnical report, which addre sses the
suitability of the subject property for the proposed development;
vi. Registration of a Statutory Right -of-Way plan and agreement for sanitary sewer;
vii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether
there is any evidence of underground fuel storage ta nks on the subject property . If so, a
Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the subject propert y is not a
contaminated site; and
viii. Registration of Archaeological Report, prepared by Antiquus Archaeological Consultants
Ltd., dated September 6, 2013, with the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource
Operations, Archaeological Branch.
C) DISCUSSION:
1) Background Context:
Applicant: DAMAX Consultants Ltd.
Owner: Ignacio Chua
Legal Description: Lot 1 District Lots 263 and 246 Group 1 New
Westminster District Plan 21483
OCP:
Existing: Agricultural
Proposed: Urban Residential; Conservation
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential)
- 3 -
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential
Designation: Urban Residential
South: Use: Single Family Residential (recently approved 2013-
016-RZ)
Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential, Neighborhood Park,
Conservation
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
West: Use: Golf Course (City of Pitt Meadows)
Zone: Unknown
Designation: Unknown
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential and Conservation
Site Area: 1.865 ha (4.6 acres)
Access: Allison Street, 201 Street, Davenport Drive
Servicing: Urban Standard
2)Project Description :
The subject property (Appendix A) is located in west Maple Ridge, adjacent to Golden Ears Way on
the border of Pitt Meadows. The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property to allow for
future subdivision into 13 single family lots. The existing single family house on site will be retained
at this time, and may be the subject of a future subdivision application. The existing single family
house will continue to be accessed from a driveway off McIvor Avenue. The new lots will be
accessed from extensions to Allison Street, 201 Street, and Davenport Drive. Allison Street will be
extended south to end in a cul-de-sac giving access to lots 10, 11 and 12 (Appendix C). Davenport
Drive and 201 Street are proposed to be extended south to loop and merge into one, giving access
to lots 1 - 9 (Appendix C).
The subject property is considered suitable for urban development, as the surrounding context of
the site is designated Urban Residential in the OCP. The property to the south is a single family
residential lot that was granted final reading on November 4, 2014, to be rezoned from RS-3 (One
Family Rural Residential) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban
(Medium Density) Residential) to permit future subdivision into 13 lots. A tributary to Katzie Slough
is located on the southern property boundary, running in an east-west direction, for which a 15
metre (50 feet) environmental dedication is recommended for conservation purposes.
- 4 -
Agricultural Land Reserve:
In April 2013, the property owner applied to exclude the subject property from the
Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR), as it was deemed not suitable for farming. The Agricultural
Land Commission had previously identified and recommended the subject property for
exclusion from the ALR.
3) Planning Analysis:
Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy:
During the Regional Growth Strategy review, the subject property was designated General
Urban and included within the Region’s Urban Containment Boundary.
i) Official Community Plan :
The subject property is currently designated Agricultural. The proposed development will
require an OCP amendment to: (a) include the subject property within the Urban Area
Boundary, aligning Schedule “B” of the OCP with the Regional Urban Containment Boundary
identified on the Regional Context Statement Regional Land Use Development Map; (b)
change the designation from Agricultural to Urban Residential and Conservation allowing
the subject property to become consistent with the existing designations within the
neighbourhood and; (c) to amend Schedule “C” to designate conservation lands around a
tributary to Katzie Slough.
ii) Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property, located at 20208 McIvor
Avenue, from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium
Density) Residential), to permit subdivision of approximately 13 lots. The proposed
development lots meet the minimum zoning provisions for the RS-1b (One Family Urban
(Medium Density) Residential) zone; however, the applicant is seeking a development
variance to the Zoning Bylaw for building height, as outlined in the subsequent section.
iii) Proposed Variances:
A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves
the following relaxations (see Appendix D):
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985, Part 6, Section 601, 11 (b) to
increase the maximum permitted height from 9.5 to 11 metres (31-36 feet).
The requested variances to the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
zone will be the subject of a future Council report.
iv) Development Permits :
Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit
application is required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the
top of bank of all watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection
- 5 -
Development Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and
enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas.
v)Development Information Meeting :
A Development Information Meeting was held at Laity View Elementary School on June 17,
2014. Approximately 12 people attended the meeting. A summary of the main comments
and discussions with the attendees was provided by the applicant and include the following
main points:
1. Concern for noise, dust and vibrations from placement and compaction of fill.
2. Concern regarding drainage problems after development.
3. Concern regarding an increase in traffic due to the proposal to connect 201 Street to
the south, as well as suggestions of traffic calming measures.
vi)Parkland Requirement:
As there are more than two additional lots proposed to be created, the developer will be
required to comply with the park dedication requirements of Section 941 of the Local
Government Act prior to subdivision approval.
For this project, there is sufficient land that is proposed to be dedicated as park on the
subject property and this land will be required to be dedicated as a condition of Final
Reading.
4)Environmental Implications:
The applicant has submitted an Environmental Assessment prepared by Letts Environmental
Consultants Ltd. The Environmental Assessment report explains that a tributary to Katzie Slough,
with an average width of 1-2 metres (3-6.5 feet), and is located on the southern property boundary
and flows west under Golden Ears Way. A 15 metre (50 feet) environmental dedication is
recommended for conservation purposes around the tributary. A Watercourse Protection
Development Permit is being processed in support of this proposal which will include enhancement,
restoration and re-vegetation work within the setback areas. An “Enhancement and Protection
Agreement” outlining refundable securities to complete the works and maintenance for 5 years
including a Storm Water Management Restrictive Covenant will be required prior to approval of the
Watercourse Protection Development Permit.
5)Traffic Impact:
As the subject property is located within 800 metres of the Lougheed Highway, a referral has been
sent to the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.
Ministry approval of the Zone Amending Bylaw will be required as a condition of final reading. On
May 14, 2014 the Ministry granted preliminary approval of the development application.
- 6 -
6)Interdepartmental Implications:
i)Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and confirms that all the deficient off-site
services, including the required road dedication, are being provided through the Subdivision
Servicing Agreement. The Engineering Department has no concerns with the proposed land use.
7)School District Comments:
Pursuant to Section 881 of the Local Government Act, consultation with School District No. 42 is
required at the time of preparing or amending the OCP. A referral was sent to School District No. 42
on May 5, 2014 and identified that the proposed development would affect the student population
for the catchment areas currently served by Fairview Elementary and Westview Secondary. The
2013-14 school year at Fairview Elementary had a student enrolment rate of 65% utilization;
Westview Secondary had a student enrolment rate of 75% utilization.
8)Intergovernmental Issues:
i)Local Government Act :
An amendment to the OCP requires the local government to consult with any affected
parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section
879 of the Local Government Act. The amendment required for this application, to change
the designation from Agricultural to Urban Residential and Conservation; to include the
subject property in the Urban Area Boundary (Schedule B); and to amend Schedule C to
designate conservation lands around the tributary of Katzie Slough, is considered to be
minor in nature as these amendments are to bring the OCP land uses into alignment with
the Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy. It has been determined that no additional
consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the
Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District
or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments.
The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste
Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no
impact.
ii)Archaeological Issues:
The subject property is located on a known archeological site (DhRp 52), as initially
identified with the recently approved development to the south, located at 20178 Chatwin
Avenue (2013-016-RZ). The applicant has hired Antiquus Archaeological Consultants Ltd.,
a professional archeological firm, to review the subject property. Site work was conducted
during the fall of 2012 and spring of 2013, under the Archaeological Branch Permit No.
2012-0305. As part of the archaeological fieldwork, the subject property was divided into
three management areas and classified based on the amount of artifacts recovered during
the initial assessment. One area in particular, zone B, was classified as having significant
heritage value, with recommendations made for each zone to be carried out prior to
development.
- 7 -
D)CONCLUSION:
The development proposal fits with the surrounding neighborhoods, designated Urban Residential,
to the north, east, and recently approved application (2013-016-RZ) to the south. An environmental
dedication of 15 metres (50 feet) and enhancement of a tributary to the Katzie Slough will be
included as conservation land on the southern boundary of the subject property. The site has an
identified archaeological sensitive area; therefore, a final archaeological report will be registered
with the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations. Official Community Plan
amendments are required as described in this report and justification has been provided in support
of these amendments.
It is recommended that first and second reading be given to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7121-2014,
that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7021-2013, and that application 2013-
039-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing.
“Original signed by Adam Rieu”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adam Rieu
Planning Technician
"Original signed by Christine Carter"
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
"Original signed by Frank Quinn"
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
"Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule"
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7121-2014
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7022-2013
Appendix D – Subdivision Plan
- 1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-115-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Final One Year Extension Application
12018, 12038 Edge Street and 22554, 22566 Brown Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Council granted a one year extension to the above noted application on March 10, 2015. The
applicant has now applied for a final one year extension under Maple Ridge Development
Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999. This application is to permit a three phased mixed use
development consisting of 240 apartment units in three towers (6, 13 to 19 storeys), 4,380m2
(47,144ft2) of commercial floor area, with 2 levels of underground parking and 2 levels of above
ground structured parking subject to the CD-1-13 (Comprehensive Development Zone) zone.
Pursuant with Council’s resolution, this application is exempt from the CAC program, due to its
location in the Town Centre Area and because it received third reading on December 10, 2013.
RECOMMENDATION:
That pursuant to Maple Ridge Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 -1999, a second and final
one year extension be granted for rezoning application 2012-115-RZ (property located at 12018,
12038 Edge Street and 22554, 22566 Brown Avenue) and that the following conditions be
addressed prior to consideration of Final Reading:
i.Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt
of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;
ii.Registration of a Development Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant for the proposed
bonus elements and receipt of deposits as securities, as outlined in the Agreement;
iii.Receipt of a voluntary contribution of $100,000 for public art;
iv.Amendment to Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan;
v.Road dedication as required;
vi.A portion of the municipal lane between the properties 12038 and 12018 Edge Street
be closed, purchased by the applicant and consolidated into the development site;
1108
- 2 -
vii. Lot consolidation and re -subdivision of the development site to three lots consistent
with the phasing boundaries;
viii. Registration of a Statutory Right -of-Way plan and agreement for vehicular and
pedestrian purposes in place of the current municipal lane;
ix. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the
suitability of the site for the proposed development;
x. Registration of an easem ent for public passage for the areas between Brown Avenue,
Edge Street and Dewdney Trunk Road rights -of-way and the buildings and to future
roof top open spaces;
xi. Registration of reciprocal access agreements for vehicle and pedestrian passage
through the parking structure between phases and between levels, as well as to the
future extension of the parking building to the east on Brown Avenue (2013 -019-RZ);
xii. Registration of a restrictive covenant protecting required off -street parking spaces
located on separate lots of this development;
xiii. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking;
xiv. Registration of a restrictive covenant and entering into a Housing Agreement
respecting adaptive housing and rental housing;
xv. Removal of all the existing buildings located at 12038 Edge Street, 22554 Brown
Avenue and 22566 Brown Avenue;
xvi. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising
whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence,
a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance
with the regulations; and
xvii. Pursuant to the Contaminated Site Regulations of the Environmental Management
Act, the property owner will provide a Site Profile for the subject lands.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Bissky Architecture and Urban Design Inc.
Wayne Bissky
Owner: Ascent One Properties Ltd. (Inc. No. BC0949104)
- 3 -
Legal Description: Lot: 303, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: NWP44882
Lot: 4, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: NWP8081
Lot: 5, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: NWP8081
Lot: 6, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: NWP8081
OCP:
Existing: Town Centre Commercial, Low-Rise Apartment
Proposed: Town Centre Commercial
Zoning:
Existing: CS-1 (Service Commercial), RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: CD-1-13 (Comprehensive Development Zone)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Duplex and Single Family Residential
Zone: RT-1 and RS-1
Designation: Medium and High-Rise Apartment
South: Use: Civic Complex and Commercial
Zone: P-1 and C-3
Designation: Institutional and Town Centre Commercial
East: Use: Municipal parking lot, Single Family Residential
and Commercial (under application 2013-019-RZ
for 4th Tower by same developer)
Zone: CS-1 and C-3
Designation: Medium and High-Rise Apartment, and Town
Centre Commercial
West: Use: Apartment & recently completed apartment
development (RZ/078/09), Shopping center
Zone: RM-2, RM-3 and C-3
Designation: Town Centre Commercial and Low-Rise Apartment
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Dwellings (3 lots along Brown Avenue); Commercial
Use (Lot at corner of Edge Street and Dewdney Trunk Road)
Proposed Use of Property: Commercial and Multi-Residential Mixed Use Phased Development
Site Area: 0.43 Ha. (1.06 acres) excluding lane proposed to be included as
part of the development site
Access: Dewdney Trunk Road, Edge Street, Brown Avenue and lane
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
Companion Applications: 2012-115-DP
This application is to permit a three phased mixed use development consisting of 240 apartment
units in three towers (6, 13 to 19 storeys), 4,380m2 (47,144 ft2) of commercial floor area, with 2
levels of underground parking and 2 levels of above ground structured parking.
- 4 -
The following dates outline Council’s consideration of the application and Bylaws 7019-2013 and
6966-2013:
The First Reading Report (see attached) was considered on February 18, 2013.
First Reading was granted February 26, 2013.
The Second Reading Report (see attached) was considered on November 4, 2013.
Second Reading was granted November 12, 2013.
Public Hearing was held December 10, 2013.
Third Reading was granted December 10, 2013.
First Extension, applying retroactively, was granted on March 10, 2015.
Application Progress:
The applicant is currently working on all of the items to allow this application to proceed to Council
for Final Reading. The main emphasis has been on responding to the offsite Engineering and
service design changes and completing the purchase agreement for the lane between phases 2 and
3. It is anticipated that items will be completed in about 3 months.
Comment on Amenity Contribution:
On October 19, 2015, Council passed a number of resolutions pertaining to the establishment of a
City wide Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) program. Options were discussed about where the
CAC should or should not be applied. Council passed a resolution that trghe CA would not apply to
developments in the Town Centre Area. Therefore, this application will not be subject to the CAC
program.
Alternatives:
Council may choose one of the following alternatives:
1.grant the request for extension;
2.deny the request for extension; or
3.repeal third reading of the bylaw and refer the bylaw to Public Hearing.
- 5 -
CONCLUSION:
The applicant has been actively pursuing the completion of this rezoning application and has applied
for a final one year extension.
“Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP
Planner
“Original signed by Chuck Goddard” for
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn
GM: Public Works & Development Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Second Reading Report
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: Feb 14, 2013FILE: 2012-5=BY: PC
12018/38 EDGE STREET &
22554/66 BROWN AVENUE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
´
Scale: 1:2,000
APPENDIX A
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Dec 3, 2012 FILE: 2012-115-RZ BY: PC
12018/38 EDGE STREET
22554/66 BROWN AVENUE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
´
Scale: 1:1,500
SKRWRJUDSK\LPDJH
APPENDIX B
District of Maple Ridge
TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 4, 2013
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2012-115-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading:
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7019-2013; and
Second Reading:
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6966-2013
12018 Edge Street, 12038 Edge Street, 22554 Brown Avenue and 22566
Brown Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject site from CS-1 (Service Commercial) and
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to CD-1-13 (Comprehensive Development Zone), to permit a
phased three tower development of 240 apartment units and 4,380 m2 (47,144 ft2) of commercial
floor area, with 2 levels of underground parking and 2 levels of above ground structured parking.
The proposed Comprehensive Development Zone (CD-1-13 – Appendix C) has been crafted to
accommodate the proposal and complies with the Official Community Plan. An Official Community
Plan amendment, however, is required to extend the Town Centre Commercial designation to the
three lots fronting Brown Avenue.
This application received first reading for Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6966-2013 on
February 26, 2013. With the submission of detailed information, further discussions with the
applicant and the Municipal Solicitor, the CD Zone has been finalized.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1.That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and
on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7019-2013 on the municipal website and requiring that the applic ant host a
Development Information Meeting, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any
further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw;
2.That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7019-2013 be considered in
conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
3.That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7019-
2013 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Man agement Plan;
APPENDIX C
- 2 -
4.That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7019-2013 be granted first
and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
5.That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6966-2013 as amended, be granted second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing;
6.That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading:
i.Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt
of the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;
ii.Registration of a Development Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant for the proposed
bonus elements and receipt of deposit s as securities, as outlined in the Agreement;
iii.Receipt of a voluntary contribution of $100,000 for public art;
iv.Amendment to Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan;
v.Road dedication as required;
vi.A portion of the municipal lane between the properties 12038 and 12018 Edge Street
be closed, purchase d by the applicant and consolidated into the development site;
vii.Lot consolidation and re -subdivision of the development site to three lots consistent
with the phasing boundaries;
viii.Registration of a Statutory Right -of-Way plan and agreement for vehicular and
pedestrian purposes in place of the current municipal lane;
ix.Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the
suitability of the site for the proposed development;
x.Registration of an easement for public passage for the areas between Brown Avenue,
Edge Street and Dewdney Trunk Road rights-of-way and the buildings and to future
roof top open spaces;
xi.Registration of reciprocal access agreements for vehicle and pedestrian passage
through the parking structure between phases and between levels, as well as to the
future extension of the parking building to the east on Brown Avenue (2013-019-RZ);
xii.Registration of a restrictive covenant protecting required off -street parking spaces
located on separate lots of this development;
xiii.Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor P arking;
- 3 -
xiv. Registration of a restrictive covenant and entering into a Housing Agreement
respecting adap tive housing and rental housing;
xv. Removal of all the existing buildings located at 12038 Edge Street, 22554 Brown
Avenue and 22566 Brown Avenue;
xvi. A disclos ure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising
whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence,
a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance
with the regulations; and
xvii. Pursuant to the Contaminated Site Regulations of the Environmental Management
Act, the property owner will provide a Site Profile for the subject lands.
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
Applicant: Bissky Architecture and Urban Design (Agent: Wayne Bissky)
Owner: Ascent One Properties Ltd (Inc. No. BC0949104)
Legal Description: Lot: 303, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: NWP44882
Lot: 4, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: NWP8081
Lot: 5, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: NWP8081
Lot: 6, Section: 20, Township: 12, Plan: NWP8081
OCP:
Existing: Town Centre Commercial and Low-Rise Apartment
Proposed: Town Centre Commercial
Zoning:
Existing: CS-1 (Service Commercial) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: CD-1-13 (Comprehensive Development Zone)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Duplex and Single Family Residential
Zone: RT-1 and RS-1
Designation: Medium and High-Rise Apartment
South: Use: Civic Complex and Commercial
Zone: P-1 and C-3
Designation: Institutional and Town Centre Commercial
East: Use: Municipal parking lot, Single Family Residential
and Commercial
Zone: CS-1 and C-3
Designation: Medium and High-Rise Apartment, and Town
Centre Commercial
- 4 -
West: Use: Apartment & recently completed apartment
development (RZ/078/09), Shopping center.
Zone: RM-2, RM-3 and C-3
Designation: Town Centre Commercial and Low-Rise Apartment
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Dwellings (3 lots along Brown Avenue)
Commercial Use (Lot at corner of Edge Street and Dewdney
Trunk Road)
Proposed Use of Property: Commercial and Multi-Residential Mixed Use Phased
Development
Site Area: 0.43 Ha. (1.06 acres) excluding lane proposed to be included
as part of the development site
Access: Dewdney Trunk Road, Edge Street and Brown Avenue
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
Companion Applications: 2012-115-DP
b)Background :
The applicant has submitted the necessary detailed information about the proposal to proceed to
second reading and public hearing. At the time of the first reading report (February 26, 2013), the
size, complexity, timing and servicing requirements associate with the project suggested the use of a
Phased Development Agreement. However, now that the project is fully understood, a traditional CD
Bylaw with restrictive covenants and securities is sufficient to regulate this development.
The terms and conditions of approval of the CD Bylaw are as follows:
A rezoning servicing agreement (registered as a restrictive covenant) that will state the
services, utilities, etc. that are to be provided prior to each phase commencing;
A development covenant that will state the bonus elements to be provided by the developer
to obtain the requested commercial and residential floor space (floor space ratio) stated in
the CD Bylaw in each of the three (3) phases, and required performance securities; and
A housing agreement respecting the proposed adaptive housing and rental housing. This
requires an authorizing bylaw that is not subject to a public hearing.
These three documents are described in the Planning Analysis Section of this report.
The development site is flat and consists of four (4) lots. There are existing houses and accessory
buildings on the three (3) lots facing Brown Street to be demolished prior to final adoption. The
commercial building (Paliotti's Restaurant) on the lot at the corner of Edge Street and Dewdney
Trunk Road may be retained and will be demolished at a later date, prior to the third phase of
development.
c)Project Description:
The proposal is a commercial and multiple residential mixed-use development, having a total of 240
residential units and 4,380 m2 (47,144 ft2) of commercial floor area, with underground and
- 5 -
structured parking. It consists of commercial floor space and a parking podium, extending across
the entire site, with three (3) separate towers stepping up in height from 6, 13 to 19 storeys.
The western portion of the existing lane off of Edge Street north of Dewdney Trunk Road, is to be
incorporated into the project. It will remain open via a public access easement allowing for public
use, servicing and parking access. This will allow the above ground and underground parking levels
to be uninterrupted structures.
The podium structure will be 4-storeys along Edge Street, stepping down in Phase 1 to 2 storeys
along Brown Avenue. The podium structure will have commercial floor space on the ground level
along all three fronting streets and parking on the second level in all three phases. I n phase 2 and
3, there will be an additional 3rd level of parking with the 4th level of the podium containing
additional commercial floor space. Amenity and mechanical rooms may be situated on the above
ground parking levels.
Three towers are proposed atop the podium structure. The first phase tower is to be a 6-storey, 48
residential dwelling unit structure facing Brown Avenue. The second phase is to be a 13 -storey, 72
residential dwelling unit towers at the corner of Brown Avenue and Edge Street, and the tallest
building is to be a 19-storey 120 residential dwelling unit tower at the corner of Edge Street and
Dewdney Trunk Road.
This development is to be built in three phases (See Schedule “A” in Appendix C) over a period
estimated to be 8 years. The floor space ratio (FSR) includes both the commercial and the
residential floor areas. By including both the commercial and residential floor areas together, the
FSR figures will increase slightly over the amounts stated in the first reading bylaw. A summary of
the phases is described in the table below (See Appendix D and Appendix E for site plans, elevations
and renderings):
Phase 1: A 6 storey structure with a FSR of 2.937 and having 630.6 m2 (6,788 ft2) of
commercial and 3,840.3 m2 (37,462 ft2) of residential floor area. It would be located at the
eastern end of the site fronting on Brown Avenue. There would be 48 residential dwelling
units, and 104 underground or structured parking spaces, including visitor parking spaces;
Phase 2: A 13 storey structure with a FSR of 5.28 and having 1,852.6 m2 (19,941 ft2) of
commercial and 6,214.3 m2 (66,890 ft2) of residential floor area. It would be located at the
corner of Brown Avenue and Edge Street, next to and adjacent to the first phase, having a
presence on both streets. There would be 72 residential dwelling units, and 105
underground or structured parking spaces, including visitor parking spaces; and
Phase 3: A 19 storey structure with a FSR of 6.479 and having 1,896.6 m2 (20,415 ft2) of
commercial and 8,851.4 m2 (95,276 ft2) of residential floor area. It would be located at the
corner of Edge Street and Dewdney Trunk Road, south of and next to the second phase,
having a presence on both streets. There would be 120 residential dwelling units, and 133
underground or structured parking spaces, including visitor parking spaces;
- 6 -
The following table summarizes the proposal:
Gross Floor Area
Square Meters & (Square Feet)
Phase Commercial Residential Dwelling
units
Building
Height
(Storeys)
Total FRS
(Resid. FSR)
Parking
Phase 1 630.6 m2
(6,788 ft2)
3,480.3 m2
(37,462 ft2) 48 6 2.937
(2.548) 104
Phase 2 1,852.6 m2
(19,941 ft2)
6,214.3 m2
(66,890 ft2) 72 13 5.28
(3.996) 105
Phase 3 1,896.6 m2
(20,415 ft2)
8,851.4 m2
(95,276 ft2) 120 19 6.470
(5.461) 133
TOTAL 4,379.8 m2
(47,144 ft2)
17,253.3 m2
(185,713 ft 2) 240 323
Using the C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Zone as a guide, Phases 2 and 3 of this proposal will
exceed the permitted residential floor area of 2.3 times the lot area. The proposed densities are
noted in the above table. As this development is in keeping with the objectives of densification in
the Town Centre and is in the Town Centre Incentive Area, the creation of a CD (Comprehensive
Development Zone) with bonus provision (as described in the Planning Analysis section) allowing the
envisioned densities to be achieved is appropriate. The agent for the owners has reviewed the CD
Zone and is comfortable with the Bylaw as it reads.
The development site is located within Sub Area 1 of the Town Centre Area Incentive Program, and
meets the conditions to be included in the program. The proposal does not currently have
information about “green” or energy efficiency-related considerations; therefore the applicant has
been advised that a larger incentive benefit is available under the Incentive Program by
incorporating LEED/energy conservation measures into this project. Further information in this
regard is proposed to be provided as a component of the Town Centre Development Permit.
d)Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan :
The development site is located within the Town Centre Area Plan. The one lot at the corner of
Dewdney Trunk Road and Edge Street is designated Town Centre Commercial. The remaining 3 lots
along the south side of Brown Avenue are designated Low-Rise Apartment. To accommodate this
proposal, the 3 lots on Brown Avenue will need to be redesignated to Town Centre Commercial to
match the designation of the corner lot on Dewdney Trunk Road.
This redesignation is supportable because:
it will give a consistent designation for the entire site;
it is more in keeping with the Medium and High-Rise Apartment designation of the other
properties along this stretch of Brown Avenue;
- 7 -
the proposal will contribute in creating a compact and vibrant Central Business District with
mixed uses envisioned in the Town Centre Area Plan;
the strategic location of the site being across from the Civic Core area; and
will permit a consistent form and character of all the lands comprising the project.
The proposed CD Zone and the C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) Zone, upon which it was modeled, are
both permitted zones for the OCP Category of Town Centre Commercial Designation in the Zoning
Matrix.
The proposal will contribute to the OCP objective to create a compact and vibrant commercial area
that is pedestrian-oriented, including commercial, mixed-use, and multi-family residential uses.
Apart from the redesignation described above, the proposed development complies with the
following Land-Use Designation policies in the Town Centre Area Plan:
3-29 Building heights within the Town Centre Commercial will range from three (3) storeys in
height to over twenty (20) storeys. Generally, building heights should not be permitted
greater than twenty-five (25) storeys.
3-30 Multi-Family Residential use is permitted as a principle use in the Town Centre
Commercial designation, except where identified on Schedule “G” as “Ground Floor
Commercial Required” in the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw, where the ground floor use is to
be commercial.
3-31 Within a Mixed-Use development, retail, service, and entertainment uses shall be
encouraged at ground level with office and/or residential uses encouraged above-grade.
Appendix F contains an analysis of how this project complies with the applicable OCP Policies.
Zoning Bylaw:
Background:
The proposal is to rezone the 3 lots along Brown Avenue (i.e. 12038 Edge Street, 22554 Brown
Avenue and 22566 Brown Avenue ) from RS-1 (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to
CD-1-13 (Comprehensive Development Zone), and the lot at the corner of Edge Street and Dewdney
Trunk Road (i.e. 12018 Edge Street) from CS-1 (Service Commercial) to CD-1-13 (Comprehensive
Development Zone).
A three-tower commercial and multiple residential mixed-use development is proposed to be built
over an eight (8) year period, having a total of 240 residential units and 4,380 m2 (47,144 ft2) of
commercial floor area, with 2 levels of underground parking and 2 levels of above ground structured
parking. The proposal has continuous commercial floor area along each of the three street edges.
This adhers to the proposed CD Zone where ground floor commercial space is permitted by
proposed CD Zone in each phase of the three phases, and to Schedule G of the Zoning Bylaw where
street level commercial use is manditory for Phase 3.
- 8 -
Proposed CD Bylaw Changes:
Since first reading, the applicant has provided a full application submission. As a result, and it has
become necessary to make the following changes to CD-1-13 (Comprehensive Development Zone)
previously granted first reading:
Interpretation : Terms used repeatedly in the CD Zone were defined in this section.
Permitted Uses: Apartment Use was moved to the Accessory Use Section to align with the
proposed new zoning bylaw, and off-street parking (e.g. parking lots), outdoor display or sales
areas and rentals were deleted being inappropriate for a downtown setting.
Density: The section governing density sets the maximum Floor Space Ratio (FSR) for each of the
three phases. The first reading left the bonus provision generally worded subject to more
information. Now that the final FSR’s for the project are known, they can be s et in the bylaw. The
permitted FSR for each phase is listed in the table below:
Setback: The setback for the side lot line in Phase 3 has been increased from 0.0 meters to 3.9
meters to accommodate the green wall screen on the east elevation of the lower portion of the
building.
Open Space: A minimum useable open space and indoor amenity space has been added.
Housekeeping Changes: The format and wording has been edited to be consistent with the
future new Zoning Bylaw.
Development Agreement
The proposed densities on the site exceed what can normally be achieved through the highest
density zone currently allowed in the Town Centre. Through negotiations, the developer is to provide
a number of bonus elements to bridge the difference between what can be achieved currently and
the density being requested in the proposed CD Zone. This is a restrictive covenant similar in nature
to a rezoning serving agreement. Both instruments are registered on title and would have securities
held until the requirements of the covenants are satisfied.
FSR Category Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Base Floor Space Ratio
(FSR) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Bonus FSR for
Underground or
concealed parking
0.3 0.3 0.3
Bonus FSR for Height
above second storey 1.0 1.0 1.0
Bonus FSR for bonus
elements specified in
Development Covenant
0.637 2.98 4.179
Total FSR 2.937 5.28 6.479
Note: For ease of calculating, the Phase 1 and Phase 3 FSR is rounded up to 2 places for
the bonus and the total FSR in the CD Zone for this project.
- 9 -
The additional bridging FSR bonus elements will be specified in a development covenant for each
phase as described in the following table:
These bonus elements are described more fully below:
•Public Art: Policies related to public art are included in the Town Centre Plan (Policy 3-14) and in
the District of Maple Ridge Public Art Steering Committee Policy. The Town Centre Plan
encourages incorporating public art into public outdoor meeting spaces.
For this project, this is being achieved as follows:
(1) Through a voluntary contribution of $100,000 from the developer to provide public art in the
Town Centre, to be collected at third reading; and
(2) Through a schedule of form and character guidelines including the proposed “Netting and
Fish Theme” along the exposed façade of the parking structure to enhance the visual
appearance of this structure from the streets (See Appendix G for Art Concept). These
guidelines supplement those contained in Section 8.11 of the Official Community Plan Town
Centre Development Permit Area for the Civic Core Precinct, and will be achieved through the
development permit approval process for each phase in the development.
•Adaptive Housing: It is proposed that 11% of the units in each phase be Adaptive Housing.
Adaptable housing involves the design and construction of dwellings to meet occupants'
changing needs over time. When constructed, a number of features would be incorporated that
are more practical for people who are elderly or have a disability to live a normal life. These
standards are incorporated into BC Building Code Section BC Building Code Section 3.8.5
(Building Requirements for Persons with Disabilities), The Building Access Handbook 2007, and
the SAFERhome Standards Criteria (attached as Appendix H) would be attached to the
development covenant and achieved through the building permit approval process.
Adaptive housing strives to helps people stay in their own homes through illness, injury and aging
or who have disabilities, and by being in place, reducing the cost of future renovations to allow
people to function and stay in ones home as long as possible. The adaptive dwellings will include:
wider corridors and doorways, bathrooms and kitchens that facilitate more space to maneuver
with walkers or wheelchairs, construction features such as stronger materials under drywall to
Development Agreement
Bonus Elements for Phase 1
Development Agreement
Bonus Elements for Phase 2
Development Agreement
Bonus Elements for Phase 3
Public Art on Facade
Adaptive Housing
Rental Housing
Green Screen
Electric Vehicle Charging Station
Public Art on Facade
Adaptive Housing
Rental Housing
2 Electric Vehicle Charging
Stations
Public Art on Facade
Adaptive Housing
Rental Housing
Green Screen
2 Electric Vehicle Charging
Stations
Outdoor Community Space
Indoor Community Space
Community Digital
Information Board
- 10 -
support future installation of grab bars in the bathroom and purpose-built features such as
accessible positioning of electrical outlets higher up from the floor, switches placed lower on
walls, more toe space and lower counters, and easier to operate doors and faucet handles.
The adaptive housing units would also be subject to a housing agreement, described in more
detail in a following section.
•Rental Housing: It is proposed that 10% of the units in each phase be rental units. These will be
units in addition to and not the Adaptive Housing. Further discussions are necessary to
determine the mixture of unit types (e.g. 1 and 2 bedroom units), non‐market housing (e.g.
social) and market housing (e.g. private rental and home ownership). As is the usual District
practice, these rental units will be secured through a Section 905 Housing Agreement.
A separate report will be sent to Council outlining the final terms and to obtain readings for
authorization bylaw necessary for the housing agreement. The authorization bylaw would be
considered for final reading together with the final adoption of the zone amending bylaw for the
proposed CD Zone to govern this development proposal.
The provision of this rental housing will support the OCP policies to accommodate a wide range of
housing needs in the District. Although the preference is for such units to be affordable rental, a
Housing Action Plan is not in place to help define what constitutes “affordability” and consistency
in implementing this OCP policy. However, as this is a large 240-unit housing development,
setting aside 10% or 24 units for market rental housing is a reasonable requirement, to give
future residents a choice in their housing options.
The applicant intends to insure the identified units remain rental for a minimum period of five (5)
years following the completion of Phase 3. Based on the proposed phasing, units in Phase 1
would be rented out for a minimum period of about 12 – 15 years, Phase 2 about 8 - 10 years,
Phase 3 about 5 years.
To achieve this, the applicant intends to employ Section 139 and 143 of the Strata Property Act
and by the filing of a Form J Rental Disclosure Statement with the Superintended of Real Estate.
These provisions provide for the identification of these rental units and to insure the owner-
developer or a future strata council do not pass bylaws preventing owners from renting the
identified units. Coordination of this approach with the Housing Agreement would be necessary.
•Outdoor Community Space: The public space associated with this development will include: the
street edges, features at the two main corners, a pedestrianized former laneway having a porte-
cochère entrance to Edge Street and a semi-public open space in phase 3 of about 470 square
meters (about 4,000 square feet) space at the lower roof level. There is some flexibility to allow
the roof level space to be adapted to the needs of future residents, including areas for child play,
gardening, exercise, etc. Some of this space is to be situated in such a manner to be accessible
to any future daycare in the complex and is proposed to be available for a certain proportion of
time for community use in association with events, activities or programs. The development
permits will reflect the landscaping and design details.
- 11 -
• Indoor Community Space: The applicant is pursuing a number of options for the use of
approximately 2,040 square meters (about 22,000 square feet) of commercial space on the
Fourth Floor use as a college, community meeting room, community service organization offices,
day care or a combination thereof. The particulars, including ownership, lease or rental
arrangements will be reflected in a restrictive covenant or equivalent legal instrument registered
after third reading.
• Green Screen: Through the development permit process, the details of this feature will be
specified. In addition, there will be an agreement, insuring the long term maintenance of this
natural feature. Green screens are proposed in phase 1 for the lower building wall facing the lane
and in Phase 3 for the lower level wall that is setback and facing the lot to the east.
• Charging Stations: Each phase is to have installed an electric vehicle parking station for
residential use. In Phases 2 and 3, an additional electric vehicle parking station is to be provided
in a location accessible to the general public, either in the parking building or on the street.
• Community Digital Information Board: It is proposed to incorporate a digital electronic board as
part of phase 3 as a focal element. Strategically located in the Town Centre across from the Civic
Centre, this will support and promote a busy, vital and vibrant pedestrian area. The intent is t o
sensitively integrate it into the landscaping or building façade. This will be achieved through the
Phase 3 development permit review. Bylaw Enforcement has advised that changes are being
contemplated to the Sign Bylaw to allow this type of sign as a variance category in the bylaw. By
agreement to be reached as a third reading condition, a minimum proportion of time or content
will be established for civic and community information, news, digital art display and public
service announcements.
Proposed Variances:
This bylaw was specifically crafted as requested by the applicant to accommodate the development
project. Therefore, no variances have been requested. In the event departures will be necessary, a
development variance permit application will be submitted and forwarded after staff review for
Council to consider.
Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw:
Parking and loading is to be provided in compliance with Maple Ridge Town Centre Parking
Standards in Section 10 of Parking and Loading Bylaw.
Overall, there will be 33 more parking spaces than required currently by the bylaw. With the parking
being provided in an interconnected structure, there will be legal arrangements to shared
commercial parking spaces between phases. Based on the total parking required, the following is
the minimum number of disabled parking spaces required: one (1) space in Phase 1, two (2) in
Phase 2 and three (3) in Phase 3. The project complies.
- 12 -
The number of residential and non-residential (commercial) parking spaces, including visitor spaces,
are as follows:
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Total
Bylaw requirement 62 102 156 320
Provided 100 114 139 355
Difference +38 +12 -17 +33
In addition, the required one off-street loading space is provided in each phase.
For bicycle storage, the requirement is 153 spaces and a total of 154 are proposed. Long term and
short term bicycle parking requirement for residents and users of the commercial uses are as
follows:
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Total
Bylaw Requirement:
- Residential
- Commercial
26
3
40
9
66
9
132
21
Total Required: 29 49 75 153
Total Provided: 30 49 75 154
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.11 of the Official Community Plan, a Town Centre Development Permit
application is required for all multi-family residential, flexible mixed use and commercial
development located in the Town Centre.
Unlike most residential or commercial projects, this development is being staged over a period of up
to eight (8) years. This is also different from a phased strata development where a development
permit is issued for all the design of buildings in all phases, and timing for commencing and
completing each phase is governed through a phasing declaration form issued by the Approving
Officer under the Strata Property Act.
Therefore, a supplementary set of development permit guidelines (See Appendix J) will be included
as part of the development covenant. These guidelines have been reviewed by the Advisory Design
Panel. For each phase of this development, there would be a separate development permit
application submitted, referred to the Advisory Design Panel for review and evaluated on the
following basis:
Compliance with the Town Centre Development Permit Area Guidelines;
Having a consistent form and character over the 3 phases; and
Being in compliance with the supplementary guidelines, such as provision of public art on
the façade, pedestrian and public spaces, digital display screen, green walls, etc.
The development permit application for the first phase will be brought forward to Council for
issuance in conjunction with the adoption of the zone amending bylaw to create the CD Zone for this
- 13 -
development proposal. Applications for Phases 2 and 3 would be brought forward to Council in the
future as the developer and market dictate.
Advisory Design Panel :
Referral Summary:
This project was brought before the Advisory Design Panel on June 11, 2013.
The entire project was also presented to provide context and to obtain general comments on the
entire design concept as well as specific comments for the first phase 6-storey building.
Development permit applications for the future phases will be referred to the panel for a detailed
review.
A description and revised plans addressing the following Panel comments will be included in a
future generalized and detailed development permit application report to Council.
Confirm sidewalk alternative/s to obtain wider sidewalks with street trees.
Consider location of the upper storey parking spaces and façade openings.
Consider connections for all podium levels.
Confirm location of parking lot venting.
Keep corner plazas as open as possible.
Develop a more distinctive treatment for tower roofs.
Look at providing a visual treatment for lower rooftops.
Consider articulating a green screen wall along the lane.
Consider opening up the entrances of the lane and driveways.
Look at creating an inviting treatment in the laneway including lighting and wall treatment.
Provide proper soil volumes for trees.
Explore alternative landscape treatments on the upper levels.
Show landscape elements on the elevation drawings.
Include development design guidelines in the Phase Developments Agreement.
Look at the architectural treatment of the separation between the podium and tower.
Consider providing rooftop amenity area.
Look at providing a cleaner treatment of areas between the buildings.
Look at providing a better frontage treatment for commercial units along Brown Avenue.
Consider reducing the amount of deck space on Building 2 adjacent to Building 1.
Provide clearer phasing plans showing interim treatment of exposed wall/s.
Confirm details, amounts and source of funding for proposed Public Art.
Look at including parking level screens and guard rails as public art.
Consider a child space amenity area.
Provide a pedestrian treatment across the lane and underground parking entrances/access
area.
Confirm the durability of metal panels used at pedestrian levels.
Create an entry feature in Building 1 similar to Buildings 2 and 3.
Consider separate commercial and resident garbage area.
- 14 -
Staff Comments and Conclusion:
With the full application submission being made, staff has identified additional matters to be
addressed by the applicant respecting design. These include:
Providing for architecturally integrated business and directional signage.
Insuring adequate clearance for vehicle passing through the porte-cochère (former lane) to
Edge Street.
Providing for appropriate screening and detailing of the knock out walls between phases of the
parking building before being interconnected with future phases.
Revised plans have been submitted by the project’s Architect that address nearly all ADP and further
design concerns. The usual compliance analysis will be included at a later date in the Council report
for issuance of the Phase 1 development permit.
Development Information Meeting :
The Development Information Meeting for this proposal was held on the evening of Wednesday, May
15, 2013. Materials made available to the public included: the site plan, elevations, landscaping
plans and shadow analysis. A total of two people attended with one signing the attendance sheet.
The applicant advised that no written comments were left and the only question was about building
shadows for a property across the street.
e)Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering Department:
A rezoning servicing agreement forming part of a restrictive covenant to be registered on title is
required to upgrade municipal services to accommodate the proposed density of this project.
Where appropriate the construction of these municipal services to the final design standard may be
staged with each of the 3 development phases. The details for the timing of the necessary servicing
works, relocation of existing services, the provision of any temporary facilities and processing of
security releases will be reflected in the rezoning servicing agreement, the development covenant
and other associated documents or agreements. The staging of the services in conjunction with
each project phase is not to result in the long term closures to pedestrian facilities or road right of
ways or lane access.
Details, legal instruments, including the rezoning servicing agreement and any security would be
finalized between third and final reading.
Parks & Leisure Services Department:
The proposed provision of amenities, including public art, community-accessible open space, floor
area for community or educational-related uses, and gardening space for the project’s residents, are
in accordance with a number of objectives and practices to build a vibrant Town Centre. Th e
provision of adaptive housing will give Maple Ridge residents the opportunity of aging in place, a key
- 15 -
element in achieving a healthy community. Provision of rental housing achieves the goal of having a
range of housing choices in the community, however the final agreement needs to insure that these
dwelling units are affordable rental housing that is owned and managed in a manner that is in
favour of the District, its housing policies and a benefit to the community.
The District will be responsible for maintaining the street trees to be planted along the three
frontages. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement will
be $25.00 per new tree and will be included in the securities associated with future development
permits.
Fire Department:
A number of comments were provided by the Fire Department. Comments included: having an
adequate fires safety plan, relocation of overhead wires to improve ladder access and dealing with
hazardous debris from buildings to be demolished. More detailed comments will be requested as
part of finalizing the development permit plans.
f)School District Comments:
A referral dated March 25, 2013 was made in accordance with Sections 879 and 881 of the Local
Government Act to the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows School District No. 42 concerning this project.
No response from the School Board has been received.
g)Intergovernmental Issues:
Local Government Act:
An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any
affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section
882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application to extend the Town Centre Commercial
designation, is in alignment with the goals, objectives and policies of the Town Centre Area Plan; and
as such it has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is
required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent
municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial
Governments.
The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste
Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact.
- 16 -
CONCLUSION:
This 3-tower three-phased mixed use commercial/residential development is one of the most
significant development projects and private capital works projects ever proposed in the Town
Centre. When completed, it will make a major contribution to the emerging urban character in terms
of its architecture, creating a sense of place, providing for business growth, increasing density,
creating an animated pedestrian environment and adding to the Town Centre’s skyline.
It is recommended that first and second reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan
Amending Bylaw No. 7019-2013, that second reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending
Bylaw No. 6966-2013 as amended, and that application 2012-115-RZ be forwarded to Public
Hearing.
“Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski”_________________
Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP
Planner
“Original signed by Christine Carter”____________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”______________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule”_____________________
Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – OCP Amending Bylaw
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw (CD-1-13 Zone)
Appendix D – Site Plan and Landscape Plans
Appendix E – Building Elevations, Sections and Renderings
Appendix F – OCP Policy Compliance Analysis
Appendix G – Art Concept for Building Façade
Appendix H – SAFERhome Standards Criteria
Appendix I – Supplementary Development Permit Guidelines
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2014-065-DP
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Multi-Family Development Permit
22355 Mcintosh Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A Multi-Family Development Permit application has been received for the above-noted property to
permit the renovation of a podium style three storey wood frame apartment, with 21 one-bedroom
units over a first storey concrete building. The development contains one commercial unit for a
proposed restaurant, and enclosed parking at ground level accessible from the lane. The property is
zoned C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) and is designated Flexible Mixed Use in the Downtown West
Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan of the Official Community Plan (OCP). This is an existing
building that had previous fire damage to the top floor and extensive water and smoke damage to
the rest of the structure in 2012.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2014-065-DP respecting property located
at 22355 Mcintosh Avenue.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Scott Gordon Architect
Owner: Cameron Court Apartments Ltd.
Legal Description: Lot “C” (N117936E) District Lot 398, Group 1, New
Westminster District Plan 3206
OCP:
Existing: Flexible Mixed Use
Zoning:
Existing: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Surrounding Uses
North: Use: Commercial
Zone: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Designation Town Centre Commercial
South: Use: Apartment, Commercial
Zone: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Designation: Flexible Mixed-Use
1109
- 2 -
East: Use: Vacant Lot
Zone: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Designation: Flexible Mixed-Use
West: Use: Single Family Residential Dwelling
Zone: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Designation: Flexible Mixed-Use
Existing Use of Property: Apartment, Commercial
Proposed Use of Property: Apartment, Commercial
Site Area: 1266 m2 (0.3 acres)
Access: McIntosh Avenue and rear lane
Servicing: Urban Standard
b)Background:
The building incurred fire damage in December 2012 to the top floor, as well as smoke and water
damage to the rest of the structure. A building permit application was received in May 2013 to
repair the roof, with the intention of getting residents back to their units. A second building permit
application was received in September 2013 for interior renovations. As restoration work
proceeded, the owner decided to use the vacancy of the building as an opportunity to also complete
an extensive renovation of the building exterior and landscaped deck.
In July 2014, this Multi-Family Development Permit application was received for renovations to the
exterior of the building and landscaping. The application was forwarded to the Advisory Design Panel
(ADP) meeting on May 16, 2015. The ADP provided a resolution and recommendations for revisions
to the plans; however, revised plans from the architect and landscape architect were not submitted
by the applicant. At the same time, renovations continued on the building, including several changes
to the exterior design and landscaping, as described in section c) below. The exterior renovations
are now complete and the landscaping will be in the Spring of 2016.
c)Project Description:
The renovation has replaced all the exterior material, previously stucco, with grey and white
hardiboard siding. The concrete railings across the front of the podium level roof deck and all the
suite balconies have been replaced with glass railings. A portion of the concrete overhang above the
front entrance was removed and replaced with a raised steel and glass canopy to open up and add
more light to the entry. All windows have been replaced with double glazed windows and vinyl
frames, and all exterior doors have been replaced. Textured decorative stone has been added to the
front of the building at ground-level. The floor plan for Unit 107 has been altered from the original
design by incorporating a portion of an amenity room into a bedroom (studio unit to a one bedroom
unit), and therefore providing better access to the exterior deck on the east side of the building. The
floor area of the commercial unit on the ground floor has been expanded into the parking area to
accommodate a restaurant use.
At the rear of the building, the chain link fence has been replaced with a metal picket security fence.
The existing garbage and recycling enclosure located within the parking garage is now relocated to
the rear of the building and improved with a new gate. The podium level roof deck has been
renovated and all the planters and landscaping will be replaced and enhanced. Much of the
landscaping on the south side, along McIntosh Avenue, will be visible from street level through the
glass railing.
- 3 -
The revised parking plan provides a total of 24 parking spaces; of which 19 are designated for
residents, 2 parking spaces are allocated for the commercial use and 1 parking space for visitor
parking. The plan also indicates 2 spaces designated for accessible parking, with one located in the
secure area under the building and the other at the rear of the building adjacent to the lane. An
accessible ramp has been provided from the rear parking area, which replaces the previous ramp
that was located at the front of the building (see Appendix C). On-street parking is available in front
of the building on McIntosh Avenue. A new and secure long-term bicycle storage room is located in
the secure parking area near the lobby entry, along with an outdoor short-term bicycle rack located
at the front of the building.
d)Planning Analysis:
In accordance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) Section 8.11, a Town Centre, Downtown West
Precinct Development Permit is required for this application. The key development permit guidelines
for the Downtown West Precinct of the Town Centre are listed below, with rationale from the
Developer describing how the guidelines are being met:
1.Provide a gateway to the Town Centre.
This guideline is not applicable to the development application, as it applies to locations on
Lougheed Highway and Dewdney Trunk Road.
2.Create a pedestrian-oriented, boutique style shopping district.
The proposed development, with its new design elements, including glass and steel canopies
at the entrance, provides the building with a mix of natural light and welcoming entry way.
The mixed use component, in the form of a restaurant at ground level, has the ability to
generate foot traffic from the surrounding Town Centre, as well as employment opportunities.
3.Enhance the quality, character and vibrancy of the Town Centre.
The existing stucco cladding and heavy concrete railings were replaced with grey and white
hardiboard siding of various profiles, glass railings for balconies, new double glazed windows
and a decorative stone finish at ground level. The renovated building, consisting of new
design elements, will enhance the surrounding area.
4.Reference traditional architectural styles.
The building has taken on a more contemporary style with design features including glass
and steel canopies, glass railings for decks, hardiboard siding, new windows, updated
colours and textured decorative stone finish.
5.Capitalize on important views
Looking north-east the units have a view of the local mountain range, including the Golden
Ears.
6.Provide public outdoor space.
This is an existing building, and due to the size of the footprint this guideline is not reflected
in the development application.
- 4 -
7.Provide climate appropriate landscaping and green features.
The podium will provide landscape features consisting of various trees, shrubs and ground-
cover. The clear glass railings surrounding the podium will provide views of the landscaping
from street level.
8.Maintain street interconnectivity.
The building’s main entry has been altered by removing a portion of the concrete overhang,
and replaced with a glass and steel canopy and wall sconces to allow more light into the
space. The security bars that were on the previous commercial space have been removed
creating a more attractive and friendly street-scape. The result is a more defined and
welcoming entrance to the development. Access to the secure residential and commercial
parking is located at the rear of the building, with some on-street parking located on
McIntosh Avenue.
e)Advisory Design Panel:
This application was presented to the Advisory Design Panel on March 16, 2015 and the Panel
resolved that the applicant address the following concerns and that revised drawings be provided for
staff to review. The Architect’s responses are italicized below each point:
Provide renderings to better ascertain the changes to the existing building elements,
particularly at the front of the building.
o Photos submitted in lieu of renderings.
Add canopies to the exposed balconies on the east units.
o Canopies were not added to the east units as overhangs exist.
Provide further details on the options to clad or remove the staircase block at the front
elevation.
o Staircase block was not removed, and instead painted to match and covered with
black metal slats. A new decorative stone was also added as a new design element
to the front façade.
Ensure the garbage and recycling area is more functional.
o The garbage and recycling location has been relocated from the underground
parking area to the outside rear area of the building. The new space has been
modified from the original to increase its function and accessibility.
Strengthen the separation between patios for the individual ground level units.
o Separation fencing with gates will be installed and landscaping used to define the
space.
- 5 -
Describe more fully how the underground parking areas will function, including additional
information on access to the commercial space from the parking and visitors access to
parking given that all parking spaces are behind a security gate.
o Access to the commercial space from the outside rear parking will be provided,
including a ramp, through a separate enclosed walkway along the western portion of
the building. Residential parking is in the secured area, while visitor and commercial
spaces are provided off the rear lane.
Though not required, as least one accessible parking space should be provided given the
zone permits commercial uses.
o Parking has been modified to provide one accessible space in the secure lot and one
at the rear of the building adjacent to the lane.
f)Financial Implications:
In accordance with Council’s Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of
the estimated landscape cost will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Development Permit. Based on an estimated
landscape cost of $44,829.13 the security will be $44,829.13.
CONCLUSION:
This development application is for the renovation of a four storey building in the Downtown West
Precinct of the Town Centre. Several alterations have been made to the exterior of the building,
giving it a more contemporary appearance, as well as landscaping improvements on the podium
level. Staff has reviewed the proposal’s compliance with the Town Centre Development Permit
Guidelines of the OCP for form and character, and it is recommended that the Corporate Officer be
authorized to sign and seal Development Permit 2014-065-DP respecting property located at 22355
McIntosh Avenue.
“Original signed by Adam Rieu”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adam Rieu
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_____________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Site Plan and Building Elevations
Appendix D –Landscape Plans
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Feb 24, 2015 FILE: 2014-065-DP BY: PC
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:1,500
22355 MCINTOSH AVENUE
DEWDNEY TRUNK RD
APPENDIX A
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Feb 24, 2015 FILE: 2014-065-DP BY: PC
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
District of Maple Ridge´
Scale: 1:1,500
22355 MCINTOSH AVENUE
DEWDNEY TRUNK RD
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
EAST ELEVATIONSOUTH ELEVATION8'-0"Roof Deck36.50'Parking0.00'Grade2.33'1st Flr.9.41'2nd Flr.18.17'3rd Flr.26.92'Elev. Roof42.33'lowered conc. upstandCameron CourtCameron CourtFlashing withfactory finish 4" Flashing withfactory finish Hardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemArctic WhiteDble. Glazedwindows/patio doors,Black frame, typ.Thru-wallFlashing -blackPainted Concrete,Iron GreyHardi Panel-Black11"OverhangFlashing withfactory finish Glazed/black Alum.Railings, typ.Black Alum. Railingsw.Glazed panels, typ.Alum./glassenclosure,black framePainted Concrete,Arctic WhiteCultured StoneAlpine Ledgstone Black Rundle(tight joint)glazed awningsblack frames, typ.Hardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemIron GreyHardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemIron GreyHardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemIron GreyAlum./Glass enclosure,black frameBoutique Inc.Boutique Inc.Flashing withfactory finish 4" Flashing withfactory finish Dble. Glazedwindows/patio doors,black frame, typ.Thru-wallFlashing -blackPainted Concrete soffit, typ.Iron Grey11"Overhangc/w down-lighting,typ.LightingSconces,typ.Black Alum. Railingsw.Glazed panels, typ.short termparking6-station bike rackloweredfront entranceCultured StoneAlpine Ledgstone Black Rundle(tight joint)Hardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemArctic WhiteHardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemIron GreyHardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemArctic WhiteHardi Panel-BlackHardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemIron GreyHardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemIron GreyAlum./Glassenclosure,black framepainteddecorativeblockSkylight Canopy22355notesnotesscaleproject numberissue datetitleprojectCopyright Reserved at date of issue. This plan and design is, and at all times remains, the exclusive property of Scott Gordon Architect, and cannot be used without the architect's written consent.MAIBC AIA3370 West 44th AvenueVancouver, B.C.V6N 3K8Tel. (604) 263-0410Fax (604) 263-4106SCOTTGORDONARCHITECTrevisionsdatedrawing numberAlterations22355 McIntosh Ave.,Maple Ridge, B.C.Tue, Oct 13, 2015D.P. submission July 09, 2014NORTHSite Instruction Oct 03, 2014Site Instruction Dec 22, 2014Site Instruction Feb 27, 2015Feb 27, 2015As built dwgs. Sept 24, 2015NORTH ELEVATIONWEST ELEVATIONRoof Deck36.50'Parking0.00'Grade2.33'1st Flr.9.41'2nd Flr.18.17'3rd Flr.26.92'Elev. Roof42.33'Black Alum.Picket security fence, typ.Roof Deck36.50'Parking0.00'Grade2.33'1st Flr.9.41'2nd Flr.18.17'3rd Flr.26.92'Elev. Roof42.33'Flashing withfactory finish 4" Flashing withfactory finish Hardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemArctic WhiteDble. Glazedwindows/patio doors,black frame, typ.Hardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemIron GreyThru-wallFlashing -blackBlack Alum.Picket security fence, to replace existing, typ.Black Alum. Railings@ raised beds, typ.Stucco,Iron GreyHardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemIron BlackHardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemArctic White11"Overhangc/w down-lighting,typ.Black Alum. Railingsw.Glazed panels, typ.extent of security fencingHardi Panel-BlackFlashing withfactory finish 4" Flashing withfactory finish Hardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemArctic WhiteThru-wallFlashing -blackglazedrailingPainted wall,Interior/stair,Iron GreyPainted Block,Iron Grey11"Overhangc/w down-lighting,typ.Hardi Panel-BlackCultured StoneAlpine Ledgstone Black R(tight joint)Hardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemIron GreyBlack Alum. Railings@ raised beds, typ.Hardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemIron GreyAlum./Glassenclosure,black frame6A74A8SeeINSET 'B'NORTH ELEVATIONINSET 'A'SOUTH ELEVATIONDble. Glazedwindows/doors,Black frame, typ.alum. soffit,black, typ.Hardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemArctic WhiteHardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemArctic Whitedble. glazeddoor, typ.Black Alum. Railingsw.Glazed panels, typ.Privacy FenceHardi PanelIron Greyalum. soffit,black, typ.Hardi Panelw/ extruded-reveal/trim systemArctic WhiteBuildingElevationsA63521Hardie Panel with extruded reveal/trim systemPre-finshed 'black' thru-wall FlashingAluminum Store-Front Windows & Doors (Bright alum.)Exterior Materials4Dble. Glazed windows/patio doors, vinyl frame, typ.deleted986 Insulated Metal Door 7Wall Sconce FixturedeletedPainted Concrete/Stucco/Block10Cultured Stone8"round up/down LED light111111199991031/8" = 1'-0"77777411041910
Ground flr.LobbyGroup C11'-3"intercom1'-10"expanded width7/A7831A8Align-1/2" GWB, -2 1/2" S.Stud-2" rigid insulation-Conc. block (new wall)-1/2" GWB ea. side, glued-Conc. block (new Wall)1'-0"1'-0"4'-3"1'-0"Handrail ext.at wallCameron CourtCameron CourtBoutique Inc.Boutique Inc.Repair conc.slab as req'd.Relpacedoorsand sidelights,typ.notesnotesscaleproject numberissue datetitleprojectCopyright Reserved at date of issue. This plan and design is, and at all times remains, the exclusive property of Scott Gordon Architect, and cannot be used without the architect's written consent.MAIBC AIA3370 West 44th AvenueVancouver, B.C.V6N 3K8Tel. (604) 263-0410Fax (604) 263-4106SCOTTGORDONARCHITECTrevisionsdatedrawing numberAlterations22355 McIntosh Ave.,Maple Ridge, B.C.Tue, Oct 13, 2015D.P. submission July 09, 2014NORTHSite Instruction Oct 03, 2014Site Instruction Dec 22, 2014Site Instruction Feb 27, 2015Feb 27, 2015As built dwgs. Sept 24, 2015ElevationDetails4"1'-8"Security Fence DetailScale:- 1/2" = 1'-0"6A7Entrance Section DetailScale:- 1/4" = 1'-0"3Entrance Detail (east elevation/section)Scale:- 1/4" = 1'-0"7spot lightsLobbyPLaddress signspot lights forintercom Line of concrete upstandremoval, see Structural, typ.residentialintercom'Brick'new stairbeyondremove exist'g slabEntrance Detail (west elevation/section)Scale:- 1/4" = 1'-0"8Security Fence DetailScale:- 1/2" = 1'-0"5'Brick'spot lightsOffice spacePLLine of concrete upstandremoval, see Structural, typ.residential sign/lampcommerciallamp/signspot lightsremove exist'g railingRepair conc.slab as req'd.910Front Entrance Detail PlanScale:- 1/4" = 1'-0"2Rear Entrance Ramp SectionScale:- 1/4" = 1'-0"4001002 Electrical 12'9"x5'2"HandicapAccess corridorfireplacema3-0 doorDoor activation switch,3' ht., typ.Door activation switchRear Entrance Detail PlanScale:- 1/4" = 1'-0"1
APPENDIX D
dn
STAIR #3
STAIR #2
Parking Below
Dn
Dn
Cut Slab for
opening,
Structural eng. to
determine max. size
first flr.
Exit/ent.
Exit to Parking
and Rear
Exit to
street
first flr.
Exit/ent.
painted
steel canopy
frame Steel support blocks at high
end
New Aluminum
picket
security fence
101
102103
104
105
106
107
HW
HW
HW HW
HW HW
D
B
D
W5
D
W4
D
W4a
D
W4a
D
W4
D D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
C
Living Room
15'10"x11'2"Bedroom
11'10"x10'10"Bedroom
11'9"x10'11"Living Room
15'7"x10'8"
Dining Room
7'6"x7'
Dining Room
7'7"x6'8"
Living Room
14'3"x11'8"
Living Room
14'1"x11'2"
Living Room
14'9"x11'10"
Living Room
15'3"x11'6"
Living Room
11'6"x10'3"
Bedroom
12'6"x12'3"
Bedroom
12'3"x11'6"
Bedroom
11'7"x9'
Bedroom
11'3"x9'4"
Dining Room
8'3"x7'3"
Dining Room
9'2"x7'11"
Dining Room
8'1"x7'9"
Dining Room
7'5"x7'4"
Dining Room
11'6"x6'8"
Kitchen
7'5"x6'4"
Kitchen
7'6"x6'6"Kitchen 8'1"x4'Kitchen7'3"x6'4" Kitchen7'11"x7'1"Storage 9'8"x6'9"UPDOWNUP108
CORRIDOR STAIR 1
A
W4
W2
W4
W2
1
1
W2 W2
1 1 1
D1
D1
EX
CORRIDOR 100a
B
W5a
E F
D
HW
STAIR1
SUITE
SUITE
SUITESUITE
SUITE
SUITE
SUITED1 (TYPICAL)
(TYPICAL)
B
B
B
A
D1
D1
D2100
Bedroom
4'-0"
PD
PD
PD
PD
PD
PD
PD
PD
AD
PD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
PD
AD
AD
SKYLIGHT
PD
PD
AD
Irr
Irr
Irr
Irr
Irr
Irr
Irr
Irr
Precast stacking Concrete Masonry wall
retaining walls, 15" high maximum height.
Trees and shrubs on slab. See planting plan.
Maximum soil depth 15" including drain
gravel.
12" wide gravel strip between building and planter wall.
Irrigation
Stub-out
located here
Typ.
Private patios with concrete unit pavers.
Thin-set concrete slab. Ensure positive
drainage to drain, flush with adjacent
surfaces.
Existing parapet wall with new waterproof
membrane.
Planter drain in planted area.
Slab drain (Bi-level) in hard surface areas.
Planter drain with upstand for visual access
and maintenance access to slab drain.
Unit Pavers on Slab - 16"x16" precast conc.
pavers with stone pattern. Pavers set on
levelling bed of clear birdseye gravel gravel
on drainage composite mat on protection
board on water proof membrane on
structural slab. Open joints between pavers
allow vertical drainage. This is a porous
paving system.
Unit Pavers 24"x24" exposed aggregate
paver - slope to drain
Maintain Existing Concrete parapet at west perimeter -
insure 42" height is achieved by use of ex. wall and
guard.
Maintain Existing Concrete parapet at west perimeter -
insure 42" height is achieved by use of ex. wall and
guard.
Maintain Existing Concrete parapet at west perimeter -
insure 42" height is achieved by use of ex. wall and
guard.
new 42" ht.
plexiglass
guardrail at
lowered parapet
from here East.
42" perimeter guardrail.
16"x16" Conc. pavers with stone pattern
open joints with birds eye gravel swept
between joints to provide vertical
drainage
24" x 24" concrete pavers
with exposed aggregate
finish - tight joints
Thin-set concrete slab. Ensure positive
drainage to drain, flush with adjacent
surfaces.
Screens between units - typical
Planter Drain -
See Detail
1/L-2
Area Drain -
See Detail
3/L-2
4 ft. high black aluminum picket-style fence
c/w 3 ft. gates, typ.
4 ft. high black aluminum picket-style fence
c/w 3 ft. gates, typ.
Revisions :
Sheet Title:
Scale:
1/8"=1'-0"
Date: September 2014
Project No.
2014-31
Project:
Sep 17, 2014 For DEC
J o n a t h a n L o s e e L t d.
L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
#102 - 1661 W. 2nd Ave.
Vancouver, B.C. V6J 1H3
Ph: 604-669-1003 Fax: 604-669-0402
E-mail: info@jonathanlosee.com
Cameron Court
Maple Ridge, BC
Oct. 6 2014 For Review
Oct. 18 2014 issued for ADP
Nov . 18 2014 Revised hardscape layout
Dec . 11, 2014 Revised hardscape layout
Mar. 9, 2015 Add bike racks, revise podium areas
Oct. 22, 2015 Issued for Construction
Oct. 23, 2015 Issued for City Review
Nov 23, 2015 Issued for City Review
Nov 23, 2015 Issued for City Review
Nov 27, 2015 Issued for City Review
Hardscape Plan
Podium Level
L-2maximumallowedDo not allow for a depth of gravel, soil mix and
mulch to exceed 15"
If depths are required to exceed 15" install
approved polystyrene voiding such as Korodrain by
Mansonville Plastics in lieu of drain rock.
Nilex 4545 filter fabric.
75-80mm (3") washed round drain rock 20-25mm (3/4-1")
in diameter.
Protection board on root barrier. See Arch.
Waterproof membrane on slab over parking garage.
See Arch.
Top dress with 50mm (2") approved compost mulch following planting.15"Install Fraser River pump sand - max. 2% fines (sand &
clay) with 60-70% medium sieve sand and 15-20% coarse
sand, 15-20% fine sand content, free of soluble salts.
Topdress with 6" of commercial grade compost and till
into top 8" of sand. Rake smooth and plant. Topdress
with 2" compost mulch following planting.
Soil installation on slab
Scale: 1/2" = 1'-0"
2
L-2
See architectural for bldg
edge details
Continuous wooden edger, 2"
x 6" PT header. Nail into 2" x
6" PT sleeper.
10" deep x 12" wide washed,
3/4" round drain rock on filter
cloth. Slope to drain.
Coping stone secured with butyl tape or approved adhesive.
Allan Block AB Classic retaining wall on levelling bed on
composite dimple board/drainage mat. Rocky Mountain
Blend color-typical walls and caps.
3/4 - 1" dia. washed round drain rock behind wall, wrapped in
filter fabric.
6mil poly sheet continuous behind retaining wall.
Paving or planting as per layout plan.
Backfill gap between back of curb and face of wall with
3/8" clear crush gravel
Do not allow for a depth of soil mix, gravel, and mulch to
exceed 15". If depths are required to exceed 15" install
polystyrene voiding such as Korodrain by Mansonville
Plastics in lieu of drain rock.
Protection board on root barrier.
Waterproof membrane on slab over parking garage.
Growing Medium as specified..
3/8" minus compacted levelling bed on 3' wide strip of
dimple board drainage mat - NuDrain WD15WP or equivalent.
Nilex 4545 filter fabric.
Planter drain as specified with 8" dia. vertical perf pipe c/w cap for
drain inspection, wrapped in filter cloth.
Height of wall is maximum 15" above top of slab.
RETAINING WALL NOTES:
Retaining Wall on Slab
Scale: 1/2" = 1'-0"
1
L-2
slope to drain
Bi-level drain - see mech. Ensure square
grate - wrap vertical drain pipe with filter
fabric to prevent fines entering drain
system
Prefabricated drainage mat (Nilex NuDrain
WD15, or equivalent) on protection board
on waterproof membrane on structural
slab over parking garage.
Concrete unit pavers. See Layout Plan for
type and colour.
1" minimum 1/8 clear crush levelling bed.
Unit Paver on Slab
NTS
3
L2
1
dn
STAIR #3
STAIR #2
Parking Below
Dn
Dn
Cut Slab for
opening,
Structural eng. to
determine max. size
first flr.
Exit/ent.
Exit to Parking
and Rear
Exit to
street
first flr.
Exit/ent.
painted
steel canopy
frame Steel support blocks at high
end
New Aluminum
picket
security fence
101
102103
104
105
106
107
HW
HW
HW HW
HW HW
D
B
D
W5
D
W4
D
W4a
D
W4a
D
W4
D D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
C
Living Room
15'10"x11'2"Bedroom
11'10"x10'10"Bedroom
11'9"x10'11"Living Room
15'7"x10'8"
Dining Room
7'6"x7'
Dining Room
7'7"x6'8"
Living Room
14'3"x11'8"
Living Room
14'1"x11'2"
Living Room
14'9"x11'10"
Living Room
15'3"x11'6"
Living Room
11'6"x10'3"
Bedroom
12'6"x12'3"
Bedroom
12'3"x11'6"
Bedroom
11'7"x9'
Bedroom
11'3"x9'4"
Dining Room
8'3"x7'3"
Dining Room
9'2"x7'11"
Dining Room
8'1"x7'9"
Dining Room
7'5"x7'4"
Dining Room
11'6"x6'8"
Kitchen
7'5"x6'4"
Kitchen
7'6"x6'6"Kitchen 8'1"x4'Kitchen7'3"x6'4" Kitchen7'11"x7'1"Storage 9'8"x6'9"UPDOWNUP108
CORRIDOR STAIR 1
A
W4
W2
W4
W2
1
1
W2 W2
1 1 1
D1
D1
EX
CORRIDOR 100a
B
W5a
E F
D
HW
STAIR1
SUITE
SUITE
SUITESUITE
SUITE
SUITE
SUITED1 (TYPICAL)
(TYPICAL)
B
B
B
A
D1
D1
D2100
Bedroom
4'-0"
PD
PD
PD
PD
PD
PD
PD
PD
AD
PD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
AD
PD
AD
AD
SKYLIGHT
PD
PD
AD
Irr
Irr
Irr
Irr
Irr
Irr
Irr
Irr
11-Txm
7-Txm
12-Txm
10-Txm
12-Txm
4-Txm
3-Txm
6-Txm
49-SjR
59-SjR
16-SjR
6-Hes
17-Hes
3-SG
6-Ov
6-Pm
5-Hg
4-Hg
6-Hg
23-Bc
7-Bc
6-Bc
11-RhF
9-Sm P
13-Rh
6-Ov
10-EcSP-1
5-Hb
9-Hes
4-Arb
8-Arb
4-Hg
3-Ov
5-Arb
5-Hb
7-Ap
4-CcV
5-CxSP
1-Ap-CB
Revisions :
Sheet Title:
Scale:
1/8"=1'-0"
Date: September 2014
Project No.
2014-31
Project:
Sep 17, 2014 For DEC
J o n a t h a n L o s e e L t d.
L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e
#102 - 1661 W. 2nd Ave.
Vancouver, B.C. V6J 1H3
Ph: 604-669-1003 Fax: 604-669-0402
E-mail: info@jonathanlosee.com
Cameron Court
Maple Ridge, BC
Oct. 6 2014 For Review
Oct. 18 2014 issued for ADP
Nov . 18 2014 Revised hardscape layout
Dec. 11, 2014 Revised hardscape layout
Mar. 9, 2015 Add bike racks, revise podium areas
Oct. 22, 2015 Issued for Construction
Oct. 23, 2015 Issued for City Review
Nov 23, 2015 Issued for City Review
Nov 23, 2015 Issued for City Review
Nov 27, 2015 Issued for City Review
Planting Plan -
Podium Level
L-3
Ap Acer palmatum 'Bloodgood'Japanese Maple 7 1.25m, #20 pot Cont.
Ap-CB Acer palmatum 'Coral Bark'Coral Bark Japanese Maple 1 1.25m, #20 pot Cont.
CcV Cornus controversa Variegata Variegated Dogwood 4 1.5m, #20 pot Cont.
CxSP Cornus x 'Stellar Pink'Stellar Pink Dogwood 5 1.5m, #20 pot Cont.
Arb Arbutus unedo 'Compacta'Strawberry Tree 17 #2 pot Cont.
Bc Bergenia cordifolia Heartleaf Bergenia 36 #1 pot Cont.
EcSP-1 Erica carnea 'Springwood Pink'Winter heath 10 #1 pot Cont.
Hes Helictotrichon sempervirens Blue Oat Grass 32 #1 pot Cont.
Hg Hosta x 'Gold Standard'Gold Standard Plantain Lily 19 #1 pot Cont.
Hb Hydrangea serrata 'Bluebird'Bluebird Hydrangea 10 #5 pot Cont.
Ov Origanum vulgare 'Gold Tip'Ornamental oregano 15 #1 pot Cont.
Pm Polystichum munitum Sword Fern 6 #3 pot Cont.
RhF Rhododendron 'Florence Parks'Rhododendron 'Florence Parks'11 #5 pot Cont.
Rh Rhododendron hotei Rhododendron 13 #5 pot Cont.
SjR Skimmia japonica 'Rubinetta' Rubinetta Skimmia 124 #3 pot Cont., (Male & Female)
SG Spiraea 'Goldmound'Goldmound Spirea 3 #2 pot Cont.
Sm P Syringa meyeri 'Palibin'Dwarf Korean lilac 9 #2 pot Cont.
Txm Taxus x media 'Hillsii'Hills Yew 65 1.5m ht B&B, Full
Assorted perennials selected by Landscape Architect 100 #1 pot Cont.
No plants shall be planted on top of rootball
Guying wire with turnbuckle
Rubber ties. 4 per tree, protect trunk with burlap
padding
Compacted soil mound
2' x 2' concrete paver with G.I. Eye-bolt
80-100mm (3-4") washed round drain rock 20-25mm
(3/4-1") in diameter.
Top dress with 50mm (2") mulch following planting.
Nilex 4545 filter fabric.
Protection board on root barrier. See Arch.
Waterproof membrane on slab over parking garage.
See Arch.
Specified sand/soil mixture
Scale: 1/2" = 1'-0"L3
Large Caliper tree planting on slab
NTS
1
L3
Shrubs shall be planted slightly higher in relation to
finished grade to allow for mulch
2" mulch from manufactured compost
Soil mixture as per Detail - river pumped sand and compost
Pay careful attention when planting to avoid the roof
assembly
NOTES:
1. Min. container size and root spread to CNTA
landscape standards for Nursery Stock .
2. Prune only damaged, diseased, or weak limbs
and roots.
3. Do not allow roots to dry out during installation
process, water plant roots well pror to planting and
water immediately following planting.
4. Ensure rootball is loosened before planting
shrubs.
Shrub planting on slab
NTS
2
L3
LANDSCAPE NOTES
1. Sizes on the planting plan shall be considered minimum sizes.
2. All landscape construction to meet the current edition of the British Columbia Landscape
Standards as a minimal acceptable standard. Plant material to the satisfaction of the
Landscape Standards for nursery stock. Extend search for plant material to Washington,
Oregon, California, and B.C.
3. Root balls to be free of pernicious weeds.
4. Top soil mixtures for the project shall be tested for particle size, Ph, and Nutrient levels, and
recommendations provided and amendments made to bring the soil up to acceptable
horticultural quality for the desired plant material, trees, or turf planting. See details for
maximum soil depths on structural slab. Install 2 inches of composted organic mulch on all
shrub beds after planting and rake smooth.
5. Provide positive grades away from buildings and toward lawn drains and catch basins.
Slope away from building at a minimum of 2%. The prepared sub-grade shall be approved by
the Consultant prior to application of top soil mixtures and finish grading. Slope towards lawn
basins at min. 4%.
6. Landscape Contractor is to provide 55 days of maintenance after the date of Substantial
Completion. Maintain to level 2 ‘Groomed’ as per British Columbia Landsape Standards.
Contractor to provide a one year guarantee for all plant material. Plants installed prior to June
(Between Jan 1 and June1) shall be under extended warranty until the June 1 of the following
year.
7. All landscaping to be irrigated system.
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2015-300-DP
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Development Permit
25467 Bosonworth Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Staff have reviewed and recommend the issuance of Wildfire Protection Development Permit 2015-
300-DP respecting property located at 25467 Bosonworth Avenue(Appendix A & B) in support of a
development plan for a four (4) lot subdivision application (2014 - 086 - SD) under RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) Zoning.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2015-300-DP respecting property located
at 25467 Bosonworth Avenue.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Paul Hayes Ltd.
Owner: Ian A. Speckman and 0943838 B.C. Ltd.
Legal Description: Lot 6 except part dedicated road on Plan
EPP32627 Section 14 Township 12 New
Westminster District Plan 17359
OCP : Suburban Residential
Zoning: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Surrounding Uses
North: Use: Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation AGR (Agricultural)
South: Use: Residential
Zone: RG-2 (Suburban Residential Strata Zone)
Designation: SUBRES (Suburban Residential)
East: Use: Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: SUBRES (Suburban Residential)
West: Use: Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: SUBRES (Suburban Residential)
1110
- 2 -
Existing Use of Property: Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Residential
Site Area: 1.982 HA
Access: Bosonworth Avenue
Servicing: City water and on-site septic
Previous Applications: 2015-086-SD, RZ/024/09 & DP/024/09
b) Project Description:
This RS-2 zoned parcel is subject to a four (4) lot subdivision proposal. Being in the Wildfire
Protection Development Permit Area, a Wildlife Development Permit must be issued by Council
before the final subdivision plan may be signed by the Approving Officer. The applicant is also
completing requirements for a Natural Features Development Permit for the northeast portion of
the site effecting proposed Lot 4 of the subdivision.
c) Planning Analysis:
A Wildfire Protection Report (Appendix C) was submitted by Diamond Head Consulting Ltd. That
report reviewed and established measures with respect to landscaping, building siting and
building finishes, to comply with the following Key Objectives ensuring that the development
within this wildfire hazard risk area is property managed:
1 Locate development on individual sites so that when integrated with the use of mitigating
construction techniques the risk of wildfire impacts is reduced.
Consultant’s Comment: Structures have been located in the middle of the lots. This
provides a large fuel free buffer between the structures and the forest area to the north.
2. Mitigate wildfire impacts while respecting environmental conservation objectives and
other hazards in the area;
Consultant’s Comment Most trees growing on the lots will be removed, mitigating most of
the on-site fire risk. There is an environmentally sensitive steep slope to the north east.
Trees on this site will be treated strategically to retain forest cover while reducing fire
behavior potential. A professional forester together with an environmental professional
will develop the detailed treatment prescription for this area.
3. Ensure identified wildfire interface risks are recognized and addressed within each stage
of the land development process; and
Consultant’s Comment The wildfire plan identifies a moderate risk from the forests to the
north, east and west. Construction materials, landscaping and fuel treatments are
specified to be followed through all stages of the development permit process. A detailed
treatment prescription for the forest area to the north east will be developed by a
professional forester together with an environmental professional.
4. Proactively manage potential fire behavior, thereby increasing the probability of successful
fire suppression and containment and minimizing adverse impacts.
Consultant’s Comment Most trees on the remaining lot areas are proposed to be removed
from the site mitigating fire risk immediately adjacent to the structures.
- 3 -
As part of the subdivision approval process, this report will be registered on title as a restrictive
covenant to be implemented through the building permit approval process. The covenant will
indicate the requirements that will apply and require that a professional sign off that plans being
submitted for building permit approval comply with the Wildfire Protection Development Permit.
d) Environmental Implications:
The northeastern portion of proposed Lot 4 will be subject to a steep slope covenant and a natural
features development permit. The requirements of the wild fire protection and the natural features
development permits will be coordinated to balance the intent of both designations. For example,
lower branches of trees will be pruned, any dead, dying or hazard trees will be removed and ground
disturbances will be limited to minimize tree root disturbed . Suitable replanting will be coordinated,
CONCLUSION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2015-300-DP respecting property located
at 25467 Bosonworth Avenue.
“Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP
Planner
“Original signed by Michael Van Dop”
____________________________________________
Approved by: Michael Van Dop
Assistant Chief, Planning & Prevention
“Original signed by Chuck Goddard” for
_____________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_____________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Aerial Map
Appendix C – Consultant’s Report
City of PittMeadows
District ofLangley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: May 31, 2012 FILE: RZ/024/09 BY: PC
25467 BOSONWORTH AVENUE
CORPORATION OFTHE DISTRICT OFMAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT253801112025450254922550225536255202554825
3
2
5
111151113025422 25460255052555925595253602538525425254422544525443255002551825541255492559625355253842543025465254942546725542255802545025485254572555625575111052539911110 25440254802558825350253702539025466254822547425590255542559225420255182552325540255722557725580BOSONWORTH AVE.
GODWIN DRIVE
112 AVE.256 ST.
P 32801
SL65 EPS 234
SL75
SL67
P 34100
SL32
SL55 SL54
EPS 234
SL64
SL38 SL39 SL40
SL61
11
SL44
SL48
EPS 234
P 35648
P 41743
8
SL51
SL45
12
SL47
SL68
SL81
SL56
SL66
P 17459
9
P 17459
SL60
EPS 234
5
41
SL80
SL33
Rem 25
SL37
SL63
SL41 SL43
SL49
SL46
SL82
SL78
59
10
P 17459
SL58
28
SL35
SL36
7
SL53 SL52
SL59
SL79
SL74
SL34
6
SL62
SL42
SL50
SL57
!(
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
SCALE 1:2,500
APPENDIX A
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: May 31, 2012 FILE: RZ/024/09 BY: PC
25467 BOSONWORTH AVENUE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT25380111202545025492255022553625520548111151113025422254602550525559 25595253602538525425254422544525443255002551825541255255962535525384254302546525494254672554225580254502548522555625575111052539925440254802558825350253702539025466254822547425590255542559225420255182552325540255722557725580BOSONWORTH AVE.
GODWIN DRIVE
112 AVE.
P 32801
SL65
EPS 234
SL75
SL67
P 34100
SL32
SL55 SL54
EPS 234
SL64
SL38 SL39 SL40
SL61
11
SL44
SL48
S 234
P 35648
P 41743
8
SL51
SL45
12
SL47
SL68
SL81
SL56
SL66
P 17459
9
P 17459
SL60
EPS 234
5
41
SL80
SL33
Rem 25
SL37
SL63
SL41 SL43
SL49
SL46
SL82
59
10
P 17459
SL58
28
SL35
SL36
7
SL53 SL52
SL59
SL79
SL74
SL34
6
SL62
SL42
SL50
SL57
!(
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
SCALE 1:2,500
SKRWRJUDSK\LPDJH
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
- 1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2014-086-SD
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: 5% Money in Lieu Of Parkland Dedication
25467 Bosonworth Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The above noted subdivision is subject to the provisions of the Local Government Act regarding
parkland dedication or payment in lieu of dedication. It is recommended that Council require
payment in lieu of parkland dedication for the property located at 25467 Bosonworth Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION:
That pursuant to the Local Government Act , Section 941, regarding 5% Parkland Dedication or
payment in lieu, be it resolved that the owner of land proposed for subdivision at 25467
Bosonworth Avenue , under application 2014-086-SD, shall pay to the City of Maple Ridge an
amount that is not less than $47,650.00.
DISCUSSION:
Section 941 of the Local Government Act requires the provision of parkland, without compensation,
as a condition of subdivision, subject to some exceptions. The land, not to exceed 5% of the area
proposed for subdivision, may be acquired in a location acceptable to the City, or a payment equal to
5% of the market value of the area proposed for subdivision is required.
Section 8.9, Watercourse Protection Development Permit Area, of the Official Community Plan states
that where watercourse protection areas are identified on the lands, the area is to be dedicated into
public ownership as Park, where possible, for the preservation, protection, restoration and
enhancement of watercourses and riparian areas. These areas also provide large vegetated areas
in urban neighbourhoods that provide corridors for wildlife and passive park areas for residents.
Where there are either no watercourse protection areas, or no suitable lands are identified for park
dedication, then 5% of the market value of the land is paid to the City. These funds are placed into
a special Parkland Acquisition Reserve Fund, for the purpose of acquiring parkland, and is typically
used where the ability to achieve parkland through development is limited.
1111
- 2 -
In this particular instance there are no watercourses present and it is, therefore, recommended that
money in lieu of parkland dedication be provided.
In keeping with past practice, the City has requested that an appraisal be provided for the 5%
market value of the development site. This appraisal is based on zoned but not serviced land.
A report from a qualified real estate appraiser has determined that the market value of the land is
$953,000.00, which indicates that the 5% value of this property is $47,650.00.
CONCLUSION:
As there are no watercourse protection areas and no suitable lands on the property for parkland
dedication, it is recommended that Council require payment in lieu of parkland dedication as
prescribed in the appraisal.
“Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP
Planner
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.Pl, MCIP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Property Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix B – Subdivision Plan
City of PittMeadows
District ofLangley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: May 31, 2012 FILE: RZ/024/09 BY: PC
25467 BOSONWORTH AVENUE
CORPORATION OFTHE DISTRICT OFMAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT253801112025450254922550225536255202554825
3
2
5
111151113025422 25460255052555925595253602538525425254422544525443255002551825541255492559625355253842543025465254942546725542255802545025485254572555625575111052539911110 25440254802558825350253702539025466254822547425590255542559225420255182552325540255722557725580BOSONWORTH AVE.
GODWIN DRIVE
112 AVE.256 ST.
P 32801
SL65 EPS 234
SL75
SL67
P 34100
SL32
SL55 SL54
EPS 234
SL64
SL38 SL39 SL40
SL61
11
SL44
SL48
EPS 234
P 35648
P 41743
8
SL51
SL45
12
SL47
SL68
SL81
SL56
SL66
P 17459
9
P 17459
SL60
EPS 234
5
41
SL80
SL33
Rem 25
SL37
SL63
SL41 SL43
SL49
SL46
SL82
SL78
59
10
P 17459
SL58
28
SL35
SL36
7
SL53 SL52
SL59
SL79
SL74
SL34
6
SL62
SL42
SL50
SL57
!(
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
SCALE 1:2,500
APPENDIX A
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: May 31, 2012 FILE: RZ/024/09 BY: PC
25467 BOSONWORTH AVENUE
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT25380111202545025492255022553625520548111151113025422254602550525559 25595253602538525425254422544525443255002551825541255255962535525384254302546525494254672554225580254502548522555625575111052539925440254802558825350253702539025466254822547425590255542559225420255182552325540255722557725580BOSONWORTH AVE.
GODWIN DRIVE
112 AVE.
P 32801
SL65
EPS 234
SL75
SL67
P 34100
SL32
SL55 SL54
EPS 234
SL64
SL38 SL39 SL40
SL61
11
SL44
SL48
S 234
P 35648
P 41743
8
SL51
SL45
12
SL47
SL68
SL81
SL56
SL66
P 17459
9
P 17459
SL60
EPS 234
5
41
SL80
SL33
Rem 25
SL37
SL63
SL41 SL43
SL49
SL46
SL82
59
10
P 17459
SL58
28
SL35
SL36
7
SL53 SL52
SL59
SL79
SL74
SL34
6
SL62
SL42
SL50
SL57
!(
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
SCALE 1:2,500
SKRWRJUDSK\LPDJH
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 01-0340-50
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Latecomer Policy
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Municipalities in Canada use a common approach when it comes to the building and construction of
infrastructure for new urban development. This common approach recognizes that those investing in
a proposed development include the capital cost of providing the required infrastructure as part of
that investment. The majority of infrastructure associated with urban development in Canada has
been built and/or funded by the development community. A municipality “inherits” this infrastructure
and is subsequently responsible for the operation, maintenance and ultimate replacement of the
asset. In other words, the up-front infrastructure capital costs are borne by developers whereas the
ongoing operating, maintenance and replacement costs are borne by local governments.
Where these upfront construction costs for infrastructure provide a benefit to multiple properties, the
Local Government Act (LGA) identifies that the costs be shared across all those that benefit. Further,
it requires that the municipality that required the installation of the services collect the benefitting
costs from the benefitting lands when they develop and pay them back to the original developer.
The City historically met this requirement using a Latecomer practice from 1987 which addressed
the direct benefit to properties frontage but did not transfer costs for indirect benefits to developing
areas. While the City had not considered indirect (or area) benefits in the Latecomer practice before,
the rezoning servicing requirements for a subdivision at 24371 112 Avenue (RZ/091/10) were used
as test case to examine how these construction costs could be captured into a Latecomer Policy.
The test case was adopted by Council on September 14, 2015 and included a motion that staff bring
back a Policy for adoption by Council. This report identifies the new Policy which is consistent with
the test case and legislation and addresses the cost recovery to developers for both the direct
benefit from subdivision requirements as well as the indirect benefits from rezoning requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT the Latecomer Policy attached to the staff report dated December 7, 2015 be adopted.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The Local Government Act (LGA) provides municipalities with the authority to require
developers to provide works and services to service developing land. However, when these
works and services provide a benefit to lands other than the land being developed the works
and services are considered to be "excess or extended services". Section 939 of the LGA
requires that the portion of the upfront construction cost for "excess or extended services"
which benefit others be collected and payed back to the original developer. 1112
To date, the City has followed a practice set out in a Memorandum to Council prepared in
1987 for the provision of Latecomer Agreements to recover construction costs for services
that provide a direct benefit to lands beyond the developing land. This practice included the
recovery of costs for works and services installed at the subdivision and development permit
stages but does not allow for the recovery of rezoning works and services. Rezoning works
and services typically provide an indirect benefit to a much broader area and the City’s legal
counsel has advised staff that Latecomer provisions may be extended to the rezoning stage
of development.
As a rezoning condition for the recent development of 24371 112 Avenue (RZ/091/10), a
significant extension to the sanitary sewer system and upgrade to the watermain were
required These servicing requirements benefitted other properties and were used as the test
case to examine the dynamics of incorporating rezoning works and services into a new
Latecomer Policy. To ensure that the proposed Latecomer Policy is repeatable, defendable
and equitable the following two principles were used for the preparation of the test case
Latecomer Agreement (LC 157/14) which was adopted on September 14, 2015:
1.Any property fronting the extension to a municipal service which can make a direct
connection to the extended services is responsible for the percentage of the upfront
construction costs equivalent to the potential number of equivalent development
units that front the extension.
2.Any property that receives an indirect benefit from the construction of excess
services is responsible for the percentage of the upfront construction costs
equivalent to the properties total number of equivalent development units.
The Local Government Act defines "excess or extended services" as a portion of a highway
system, water, sewage or drainage system that will provides service to land other than the
land being subdivided or developed. The proposed Policy further identifies excess or
extended services as providing either a direct or an indirect benefit.
a)Direct benefit is the ability to develop land which directly fronts extended services
and can be attributed to all linear facilities, such as highways, water mains, sanitary
and storm sewers.
b)Indirect benefit is the ability for a property to extend a municipal system in order to
develop land which is not fronting the excess service and can be attributed to non-
linear infrastructure such as reservoirs, detention ponds, pump stations.
The Policy also allows for special consideration to be given to share costs for linear
infrastructure extended through “non-developable” land or where proposed development is
discontinuous due to a regional condition or environmental feature.
Implementing the proposed Latecomer Policy has the potential to increase the complexity of
the allocation of the benefit and the preparation of the Latecomer Agreement will require
developers to submit schedules identifying the excess or extended service, benefitting
properties and the construction costs. These schedules will be reviewed by staff for accuracy
and fairness prior to the preparation of the Latecomer Agreement and Payment Schedules.
The attached Policy, which has been reviewed by legal counsel, is consistent with the
approach taken for LC 157/14 and is being brought forward as per the motion by Council
dated September 14, 2015.
b)Desired Outcome:
As previously noted, the current City practice does not provide Latecomer Agreements for
rezoning works and services. This limits the opportunity for developers to recover the full
value of construction costs which benefit other lands. The Local Government Act identifies
that excess or extended services are works and services which support the subdivision or
development of land and are not related to a specific development process. As such a
Latecomer Policy may incorporate rezoning requirements where they provide both a benefit
to future subdivisions or developments.
Adopting the proposed Policy as attached incorporates the necessary changes to include
rezoning works and services for the sharing of construction costs which provide direct and
indirect benefits to future developments and allow the City to identify, collect and process the
benefit as outlined in the Local Government Act.
c)Strategic Alignment:
The proposed Latecomer Policy distributes the cost for providing excess or extended
municipal services to the benefitting lands in order to achieve the land use identified in the
City’s Official Community Plan.
d)Citizen/Customer Implications:
The proposed Latecomer Policy provides a clear process for the extension of services and
cost recovery methods for developers. The Policy requires that the coordinating professional
to complete a comprehensive review of the catchment areas to determine the development
potential in order to complete the Latecomer Agreement.
e)Interdepartmental Implications:
With the inclusion or rezoning works which provide direct and indirect benefits the proposed
Latecomer Policy may increase the number and complexity of Latecomer Agreements that
the City will be required to complete and administer. The impact to the level of service being
provided will need to be monitored and additional fees considered.
f)Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The proposed Policy is within the scope of work already performed as part of the Business
plan, however with the increased number or complexity of agreements there may be
increased administration cost borne by the City. The Local Government Act allows for the
recovery of administration fees which the City could apply on a case by case basis.
g)Policy Implications:
The adoption of a Latecomer Policy would provide a consistent framework to replace current
practices.
CONCLUSIONS:
This Policy expands on the principal of Latecomer Agreements to include both direct and indirect
benefits provided by the installation of works and services that are considered by legislation to be
excess or extended by the City. The proposed Policy provides an outline on how the benefit will be
calculated and construction costs distributed across the benefitting lands.
“Original signed by Stephen Judd”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Stephen Judd, PEng.
Manager of Infrastructure Development
“Original signed by David Pollock”
_______________________________________________
Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng.
Municipal Engineer
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
General Manager: Public Works & Development Services
Page 1 of 5 Policy
POLICY MANUAL
Title: Excess or Extended Services and Latecomer Payments
Policy No :
Supersedes:
Authority: Legislative Operational
Approval: Council CMT
General Manager
Effective Date:
Review Date:
Policy Statement:
Where the City of Maple Ridge (City) requires a Developer, pursuant to section 939 of the Local
Government Act, to provide Excess or Extended Services, a portion of the Developers upfront
Construction Costs shall be recovered from Benefitting Lands based upon the following two
principles:
1.Where the Excess or Extended Services consist of works to which additional direct connections
are possible (such as a water line to which an adjacent property may be connected), Latecomer
charges shall be allocated amongst each property lying adjacent to the works in proportion to the
Equivalent Development Units (EDU’s) that will be directly connected to the works; and
2.Where the Excess or Extended Services consist of works to which additional direct connections
are not possible (such as a reservoir or a portion of a water line adjacent to property that will not
be directly connected to it), Latecomer charges shall be allocated amongst each property that is
indirectly connected to the works in proportion to the EDU’s that will be indirectly connected to the
works.
Purpose:
To outline the procedures for calculating and recovering the upfront Construction Costs where the
City has required a Developer to provide Excess or Extended Services.
1.0 Definitions:
Benefitting Lands means lands benefited by the provision of Excess or Extended Services.
Completion means the date identified by the City that the Excess or Extended Services have been
substantially complete and permits direct or indirect use by Benefitting Lands.
Construction Costs means the actual cost of constructing Excess or Extended Services.
Page 2 of 5 Policy
Designated Land Use means the use permitted under the current zoning of a property or the use
contemplated for the property under the current Official Community Plan, whichever use results in
the highest number of estimated EDU’s.
Developer means the party who pays for the construction of Excess or Extended Services.
Direct Benefit means the benefit to a property that is adjacent to Excess or Extended Services
arising from the ability to directly connect the works.
Equivalent Development Units (EDU’s) means, in respect of single or multi-family family
development, one self contained dwelling unit and, in respect of non-residential development, a
unit of development that the City considers will result in use of the Excess or Extended Services
that is equivalent to the use of such services by one self-contained dwelling unit.
Excess or Extended Services means a portion of a highway system that will provide access to land
other than the land being subdivided or developed, and a portion of a water, sewage or drainage
system that will serve land other than the land being subdivided or developed.
Indirect Benefit means the benefit to property arising from being served by Excess or Extended
Services to which the property is not directly connected.
Latecomer Agreement means an agreement between the City and a Developer regarding the
imposition of Latecomer Charges.
Servicing Agreement means an agreement pursuant to a City bylaw for the installation of works
and services by a Developer.
Term of the Agreement means the period, not exceeding 15 years from the date the Excess or
Extended Services are completed, during which Latecomer Charges will be collected.
Waived Lands are properties that are identified as Benefitting Lands in respect of which the
Developer has chosen to waive Latecomer Charges.
Page 3 of 5 Policy
Key Areas of Responsibility
Action to Take
1.0 Eligibility
During the development referral stage the City will identify if the required works
and services are considered to be Excess or Extended Services and will
reference the eligibility for a Latecomer Agreement in the referral comments.
2.0 Design Submission
At a predevelopment meeting the City will identify to the Developer the
expectations around what are eligible Construction Costs and the overarching
approach to the distribution to Benefitting Lands.
The Developer in consideration of the City’s identified approach will submit for
approval along with the civil design drawing any documentation required by the
City to clearly identify the following Latecomer requirements:
Developer ‘s full name, address and telephone number
Professional certification
City project number
Legend, scale and date
Plan view of Excess or Extended Services and Benefitting Lands at 1:2500
scale
Type, size and material of Excess or Extended Services
Estimated cost of the Excess or Extended Services
Location of existing municipal services
Location of all lands that will receive a Direct Benefit from the Excess or
Extended Services
Location of all lands that will receive a Indirect Benefit from the Excess or
Extended Services
Location of non-developable areas identified in the OCP
Designated land use for all Benefitting Lands
The number of Equivalent Development Units (EDU) for all Benefitting ands
and
All Waived Lands
Design costs may be included up to a maximum of 10% of the Construction Cost
and certified with a seal by a professional engineer to be eligible for inclusion
into the Latecomer cost.
3.0 Servicing Agreement
The Servicing Agreement will reference the requirement to prepare a Latecomer
Agreement for Council approval.
Where a Developer does not wish to participate in the Latecomer process a
waiver clause will be included in the relevant Servicing Agreement.
The City shall identify all Benefitting Lands as Latecomer Pending when the
Servicing Agreement is entered into.
Responsibility
Engineering
Engineering
Developer
Engineering
Engineering
Page 4 of 5 Policy
4.0 Construction
The Developer will pay all Construction Costs for the Excess or Extended
Services as required. All Construction Costs must be certified with a seal by a
professional engineer to be eligible for inclusion.
Where a property is connected to an existing municipal service it will be
reconnected without charge at the Developer’s expense.
Upon notification of completion a Construction Cost Summary showing the
actual cost of the Excess or Extended Services and the estimated cost of the
works yet to be completed (such as final lift of asphalt) must be submitted to
the City under seal by a professional engineer.
Maintenance work which arises after completion of Excess or Extended Services
shall not be included as Construction Costs.
If the applicant has registered status and will be completing GST self-
assessment Latecomer Charges are not subject to Goods and Services Tax
(GST). Written confirmation of non-registered status must be received by the City
prior to determination of the Latecomer Charge.
5.0 Benefit Calculation
The Developer will prepare a Payment Schedule based upon the approved
assessment of the Benefitting Lands and Construction Costs.
The payment schedule will identify the proportion of cost for each of the
Benefitting Lands based upon the following two principles:
Direct Benefit
(Total Direct Cost ÷ Total number of Direct Benefit EDU)
x Direct Benefit EDU for the Benefitting Land
Indirect Benefit
(Total Indirect Cost ÷ Total number of Benefit EDU)
x Total EDU for the Benefitting Land
For phased developments, the City will determine if the proposed phasing will
prompt the need for a secondary Latecomer Agreement for each phase.
The Developer may choose to waive Latecomer Charges for certain properties.
Waived properties are included in the total number of potential direct or indirect
EDU for the Benefitting Lands, but will be identified as having a zero payment in
the payment schedule.
6.0 Latecomer Agreement
The City will prepare a Latecomer Agreement for Council adoption in accordance
with the accepted Payment Schedule. The adopted Latecomer Agreement will
then be circulated to the developer for execution. A Certificate of Acceptance
shall not be issued until a signed Latecomer Agreement is returned to the City.
Developer
Developer
Developer
Developer
Engineering
Page 5 of 5 Policy
7.0 Benefit Charges
Under the Latecomer Agreement the City will impose Latecomer charges on
subsequent owners at the time of a servicing or development approval.
Where Latecomer Charges are based upon Direct Benefit payments will be
provided to the Developer based upon the number of actual service connections
achieved by the Benefitting Land.
Where Latecomer Charges are based upon Indirect Benefit payments will be
provided to the Developer based upon the number of actual units achieved by
the Benefitting Land.
For phased developments Latecomer Charges will be pro-rated to reflect only
the area being developed in each phase.
Interest on Latecomer Charges shall be calculated annually at a rate
established by bylaw, payable for the period beginning when the excess or
extended services were completed, up to the date that the connection is made
or the use begins, and shall be paid to the Developer with each Latecomer
Charge collected.
Payment will be made to the Developer by mail to the last known address. The
Developer is responsible for notifying the City of any changes to address or
name. Any payments returned to the City due to a failure to notify, will be held
for 12 months beyond the Term of the Agreement and any unclaimed value will
be forfeited to the City.
The Term of the Agreement shall not exceed 15 years from the time of
Completion and not from when the Latecomer Agreement is signed by the
Developer.
Total payment to the Developer shall not exceed the original upfront
Construction Costs plus accumulated interest.
In the event that the Excess or Extended Service is made use of by a property
identified as a Benefitting Land prior to completion of the Latecomer Agreement
an appropriate charge will be collected by the City and held until the Latecomer
Agreement is completed.
8.0 Fees
Any fees for the provision of Latecomer Agreements will be included in a fee
bylaw and collected at the time of application.
Planning
City
City
City
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO: 11-5320-20-40-145
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Local Area Service – Hampton Street Extension Bylaw No. 7178-2015
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Port Hammond area was subdivided in 1882 including the road dedications, however, the
infrastructure for the 20100 Block of Hampton Street between Kingston Street and Hazelwood
Street was never constructed, and the properties remained vacant. In 2012, the property owners
along the 20100 block petitioned the City and requested that a Local Area Service (LAS) process be
undertaken. Through this process, the City finances the works up-front and completes the work. All
the costs associated with the works are then paid 100% by the property owners.
The works were completed in 2014 and the one year maintenance period required of the contractor
has now passed. The final step in the process is to adopt the Local Area Service Bylaw to have the
actual cost assigned to the property owners.
At the time of the original petition, the estimated cost of the work to the property owners was
$807,190.34. The actual costs are now determined as $514,016.90 and these costs will be
assigned 100% to the owners through the Local Area Service Bylaw.
The Local Area Service process was as follows:
2012: Informal Petition from property owners
Formal LAS Petition authorized by Council and circulated to property owners
Formal Petition accepted and returned and determined sufficient and valid
2013: Design completed
Contract awarded
2014: Construction complete
2015: One year maintenance period
This report seeks Council’s adoption of the attached LAS bylaw to apply the costs to the properties.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Maple Ridge Hampton Street Extension Bylaw No. 7178-2015 be given first, second and third
readings.
1113
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The Port Hammond area was subdivided in 1882 including the road dedications, however,
the infrastructure for the 20100 Block of Hampton Street between Kingston Street and
Hazelwood Street was never constructed, and the properties remained vacant.
The construction of the Hampton Street extension is now complete and the one year
maintenance period has now expired. The costs associated with the Local Area Service will
be borne 100% by property owners.
b)Desired Outcome:
The desired outcome of this report is to obtain Council’s approval and adoption of a LAS
bylaw for the City to start billing the property owners of Hampton Street.
c)Strategic Alignment:
The Corporate Strategic Plan directs staff to provide high quality municipal services to our
customers in a cost effective and efficient manner and to continue to use a user-pay
philosophy. Utilizing the LAS legislation and process is one method that the City can use to
partner and provide services with neighborhoods in alignment with the Corporate Strategic
Plan.
d)Citizen/Customer Implications:
The final cost of the Hampton Street extension LAS has now been determined to be
$514,016.90 and is less than what was estimated in 2012 of $807,190.34. The final
individual commuted cost for each of the 9 benefiting property owners is now $55,791.90.
As per agreement among the 10 property owners, since Lot 247 already has road access
and a water service connection from Hazelwood Street, Lot 247 will not pay for water and
road construction costs. The cost to Lot 247 is therefore $11,889.80.
The property owners may elect to pay the entire amount of their share of the final costs in
full, without interest, by doing so before May 02, 2016 or pay by 15 annual installments,
amortized at an interest rate of 4.25% with an option of paying off the balance plus
applicable interest at any time during the term without incurring a penalty. This long-term
interest rate is based on prevailing market borrowing rates that are available to the City.
e)Interdepartmental Implications:
Following adoption of the bylaw by Council, Engineering Department staff will send a letter to
the property owners providing details of the payment options.
Subsequently, Finance Department staff will receive and process the commuted payment, or
add the 15 installments to the property owners’ annual taxes (should the property owner
choose to make annual payments).
CONCLUSIONS:
The LAS project approved by Council for the extension of Hampton Street is now complete. The final
cost of the works has been determined. Accordingly, Hampton Street Extension Bylaw No. 7178-
2015 establishes the LAS charges and is submitted to Council for adoption.
“Original signed by Stephen Judd” “Original signed by Trevor Thompson”
Submitted by: Stephen Judd, PEng. Financial Trevor Thompson, CPA, CGA
Manager of Infrastructure Development Concurrence: Manager of Financial Planning
“Original signed by David Pollock”
Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng.
Municipal Engineer
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
General Manager: Public Works & Development Services
SJ/
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7178-2015
A Bylaw to establish a Local Area Service for Hampton Street Extension
WHEREAS Council has been petitioned to provide a municipal service pursuant to Section 210,
Division 5 of the Community Charter S.B.C. 2003, c.26 (the “Community Charter”);
AND WHEREAS The Corporate Officer has certified that the petition received for the municipal
service does constitute a sufficient petition signed by majority of the property owners,
representing at least half of the value of the parcels that are liable to be specially charged;
AND WHEREAS Council has deemed it expedient to proceed with the works;
AND WHEREAS the ‘Maple Ridge Local Area Service Policy’, as amended, provides that the cost
of providing a municipal service shall be recoverable from each of the existing parcels of land
that will benefit from the service.
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as
follows:
1. This Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as “Hampton Street Extension Bylaw No. 7178-
2015”.
2. The Local Area Service is described as an extension of Hampton Street from Kingston
Street to Hazelwood Street (as outlined in Schedule ‘A’ attached) complete with 105m of
200mm of watermain, 100m of 300mm storm main, 110m of 200mm sanitary main, 9
water service connections, and 10 sanitary and storm service connections.
3. The Local Area Service has been completed and the final cost of the Works is contained
in Schedule ‘B’ attached.
4. Costs for the Local Area Service will be recovered according to the cost distribution shown
on Schedule ‘C’ attached.
READ a first time the day of , 2015.
READ a second time the day of , 2015.
READ a third time the day of , 2015.
RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED the day of , 2015.
____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
Attachments Schedules A, B, & C
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Committee of the Whole
SUBJECT: 2016-2020 Financial Plan Bylaw
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The 2016-2020 Business and Financial Plans were presented to Council at public meetings held on
December 1, 2 and 3. The Financial Plan overview was presented followed by a public Question and
Answer period on December 3, which was streamed live over the internet. On December 4, after
considering the presentations, business plans, incremental adjustments and citizen feedback,
Council directed that a Financial Plan Bylaw, incorporating the recommendations in the Financial
Overview Report be brought forward for first and second reading.
The bylaw will be considered for Third Reading at a subsequent meeting to incorporate any changes
that Council may wish to make based on feedback from the public. Following this, the Final Reading
will occur at a separate meeting. Approval will take place over 3 meetings, rather than the historic
practice of 2 meetings, to allow for additional time for public input.
The Financial Plan Bylaw is a consolidated plan that includes the general revenue fund, the sewer
and water utility funds and the capital program. It is in a format that follows the legislated
requirements. This includes revenue and tax policy disclosure: the objectives and policies regarding
the proportions of revenue proposed to come from various funding sources, the distribution of
property taxes among property classes, and the use of permissive tax exemptions.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That Maple Ridge 2016-2020 Financial Plan Bylaw No. 7194 - 2015 be given first and second
readings.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The 2016–2020 Financial Plan was presented to Council at public meetings along with the
Business Plans from all areas. The Financial Plan Bylaw incorporates the following direction
from Council:
•property tax increase for General Purposes of 2.1% in 2016, 1.9% per year for 2017
and 2018 and 2.0% per year for 2019 and 2020
•property tax increase for Infrastructure Sustainability of 0.50% in 2016 and 0.70%
per year for 2017 through 2020
•property tax increase for Parks & Recreation Improvements of 0.25% each year
•property tax increase for Drainage Improvements of 0.30% each year
•growth in property tax revenue (from new construction) of 2% each year
•Water Utility levy increase of 4.5% per year
Circulated separately
1131
• Sewer Utility levy increase of 3.6% per year
• recycling levy increase of 0% in 2016 and 2.75% per year for 2017 through 2020
• growth costs as detailed on page 10 of the Financial Overview Report
• incremental adjustments as outlined on page 12 of the Financial Overview Report
• Capital Works Program totaling $30.7 million in 2016, $27.5 million in 2017, $23.7
million 2018, $29.5 million in 2019 and $26.3 million in 2020
• cost and revenue adjustments from pages 27 and 28 of the Financial Overview
Report, which reconciles the 2015-2019 Financial Plan with the 2016-2020
Financial Plan
In last year’s financial plan, Council adopted an aggressive capital program and this plan
builds on that direction. The 2016-2020 Financial Plan includes a capital program of about
$138 million.
We have about $1.4 billion invested in our infrastructure and it is important that we protect
this investment. This financial plan continues the dedicated funding strategy for sustaining
our infrastructure. As well, we are a growing community and along with that growth comes
pressure on our existing services. This financial plan provides funding to help meet growth
related demands. The funding for growth and for infrastructure sustainability are in line with
Council’s Financial Sustainability Policies.
The amount of incremental property tax revenue from new construction will not be known
until property assessments are finalized. The growth assumption built into the financial plan
for 2016 is 2.0%.
Future budget amendments will include the actual growth revenue as well as projects that
were approved in 2015 and are still in progress. The previously approved funding sources
will also be included in the plan, placing no burden on 2016 property taxes.
b) Desired Outcome:
A financial plan that accurately reflects the planned expenditures and methods of funding
that is consistent with corporate strategic plans, policies and Council direction.
c) Strategic Alignment:
All departments submitted Business Plans which were prepared considering relevant
strategic and master plans. The Financial Plan reflects Council’s Strategic Financial
Sustainability Policies and Infrastructure Funding Strategy.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The business plans have far-reaching citizen and customer implications. The Financial Plan
reflects the financial impact of the business plans. Property tax revenue and user fees are
planned to increase as described in the above discussion.
After considering the presentations, business plans, incremental adjustments and citizen
feedback, Council directed that a Financial Plan Bylaw, incorporating the recommendations
outlined in the Financial Overview Report, be brought forward for First and Second readings.
The bylaw will be considered for Third Reading at a subsequent meeting to incorporate any
changes that Council may wish to make based on feedback from the public. Following this,
the Final Reading will occur at a separate meeting. Approval will take place over 3 meetings,
rather than 2, to allow for additional time for public input.
e)Statutory Requirements and Policy Implications:
The financial plan has been prepared in accordance with statutory requirements and
Municipal financial policies. There are several requirements in the Community Charter for
the Financial Plan Bylaw, including: disclosure of the proportions of revenue proposed to
come from various funding sources, the distribution of property taxes among property
classes, and the use of permissive tax exemptions. Explicit policies and objectives in each of
these areas are also required. Maple Ridge’s approach to business planning, property
taxation policies and other financial policies have addressed all these reporting
requirements. The attached bylaw includes this information.
Public consultation is an important and legislated component of financial plan preparation.
Regular feedback and interaction with the public is also considered when business plans are
developed. The business planning presentations were open to the public; there was also a
live question and answer period where comments and questions were accepted in person as
well as over the phone, email and social media like Facebook and Twitter.
f)Alternatives:
In the event that this bylaw is not adopted, the City is not authorized to make any
expenditure other than those identified in the existing 2015-2019 Financial Plan Bylaw. This
will require departments to curtail or delay expenditures and only proceed with capital
projects that were identified in the previous financial plan.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Financial Plan is a multi-year planning, reviewing and reporting tool that represents Council’s
priorities and commitment to providing quality services to the residents of Maple Ridge. The
Financial Plan provides a forecast of the financial resources that are available to fund operations,
programs and infrastructure for the five year period.
The Financial Plan Bylaw is routinely amended in late April or early May to include the projects that
were approved but not completed in the prior year. The change also includes an update to reflect
the actual property tax revenue due to the amount of real growth.
“Original signed by Trevor Thompson”_________________
Prepared by: Trevor Thompson, CPA, CGA
Manager of Financial Planning
“Original signed by Paul Gill”_________________________
Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
GM Corporate & Financial Services
“Original signed by Ted Swabey” _____________________
Concurrence: Ted Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7194-2015
A bylaw to establish the five year financial plan for the years 2016 through 2020
____________________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, through a public process in an open meeting the business and financial plans were
presented;
AND WHEREAS, the public will have the opportunity to provide comments or suggestions with respect
to the financial plan;
AND WHEREAS, Council deems this to a process of public consultation under Section 166 of the
Community Charter;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council for the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1. This Bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge 2016-2020 Financial Plan Bylaw No. 7194-2015”.
2. Statement 1 attached to and forming part of this bylaw is hereby declared to be the Consolidated
Financial Plan of the City of Maple Ridge for the years 2016 through 2020.
3. Statement 2 attached to and forming part of the bylaw is hereby declared to be the Revenue and
Property Tax Policy Disclosure for the City of Maple Ridge.
4. Statement 3 attached to and forming part of the bylaw is hereby declared to be the Capital
Expenditure Disclosure for the City of Maple Ridge.
READ a first time the day of , 20 .
READ a second time the day of , 20 .
READ a third time the day of , 20 .
PUBLIC CONSULTATION completed on the day of , 20 .
ADOPTED the day of , 20 .
________________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER
________________________________
CORPORATE OFFICER
ATTACHMENT: Statement 1, Statement 2 and Statement 3
Attachment to Maple Ridge 2016-2020 Financial Plan Bylaw 7194-2015
Statement 1
Consolidated Financial Plan 2016-2020 (in $ thousands)
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
REVENUES
Revenues
Development Fees
Developer Contributed Assets 16,500
16,500
16,500
16,500
16,500
Developer Cost Charges 12,359
8,531
9,071
13,255
9,846
Parkland Acquisition 200
200
200
200
200
Contributions from Others 1,451
1,242
1,276
1,238
1,282
Development Fees Total 30,510
26,473
27,047
31,193
27,828
Property Taxes 74,844
78,953
83,049
87,298
91,748
Parcel Charges 2,906
2,997
3,091
3,188
3,288
Fees & Charges 40,793
42,327
43,926
45,627
47,277
Interest 1,883
1,898
1,913
1,928
1,943
Grants (Other Govts) 3,991
4,829
3,691
4,855
4,531
Property Sales 1,500
1,500
1,500
1,500
1,000
Total Revenues 156,427
158,977
164,217
175,589
177,615
EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenditures
Interest Payments on Debt 2,273
2,133
2,043
1,920
1,801
Amortization Expense 20,929
20,929
20,929
20,929
20,929
Other Expenditures 100,455
103,587
107,112
110,668
114,373
Total Expenditures 123,657
126,649
130,084
133,517
137,103
ANNUAL SURPLUS 32,770
32,328
34,133
42,072
40,512
Add Back: Amortization Expense (Surplus) 20,929
20,929
20,929
20,929
20,929
Less: Capital Expenditures 30,712
27,518
23,701
29,515
26,302
Less: Developer Contributed Capital 16,500
16,500
16,500
16,500
16,500
CHANGE IN FINANCIAL POSITION 6,487
9,239
14,861
16,986
18,639
OTHER REVENUES
Add: Borrowing Proceeds -
-
-
-
-
OTHER EXPENDITURES
Less: Principal Payments on Debt 4,047
4,144
3,641
3,720
3,801
TOTAL REVENUES LESS EXPENSES 2,440
5,095
11,220
13,266
14,838
INTERNAL TRANSFERS
Transfer from Reserve Funds
Capital Works Reserve 3,149
3,549
-
-
-
Equipment Replacement Reserve 3,540
1,813
3,245
2,311
1,857
Fire Department Capital Reserve 356
-
-
-
250
Land Reserve -
-
-
-
-
Local Improvement Reserve -
-
-
-
-
Sanitary Sewer Reserve -
-
-
-
-
Transfer from Reserve Fund Total 7,045
5,362
3,245
2,311
2,107
Less :Transfer to Reserve Funds
Capital Works Reserve 3,886
2,862
4,334
4,139
3,336
Equipment Replacement Reserve 2,449
2,615
2,744
2,876
2,977
Fire Dept. Capital Acquisition 712
791
869
999
1,136
Land Reserve 5
5
5
5
5
Local Improvement Reserve -
-
-
-
-
Sanitary Sewer Reserve 30
30
30
30
30
Total Transfer to Reserve Funds 7,082
6,303
7,982
8,049
7,484
Transfer from (to) Own Reserves (501)
1,029
916
891
1,576
Transfer from (to) Surplus 2,904
3,125
5,567
6,637
7,885
Transfer from (to) Surplus & own Reserves 2,403
4,154
6,483
7,528
9,461
TOTAL INTERNAL TRANSFERS 2,440
5,095
11,220
13,266
14,838
BALANCED BUDGET - - - - -
Attachment to Maple Ridge 2016-2020 Financial Plan Bylaw 7194-2015
Statement 2
Revenue and Property Tax Policy Disclosure
REVENUE DISCLOSURE
Revenue Proportions 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
$ ('000s) % $ ('000s) % $ ('000s) % $ ('000s) % $ ('000s) %
Revenues
Property Taxes 74,844 47.8 78,953 49.7 83,049 50.6 87,298 49.7 91,748 51.6
Parcel Charges 2,906 1.9 2,997 1.9 3,091 1.9 3,188 1.8 3,288 1.9
Fees & Charges 40,793 26.1 42,327 26.6 43,926 26.7 45,627 26.0 47,277 26.6
Borrowing Proceeds 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Other Sources 37,884 24.2 34,700 21.8 34,151 20.8 39,476 22.5 35,302 19.9
Total Revenues 156,427 100.0 158,977 100.0 164,217 100.0 175,589 100.0 177,615 100.0
Other Sources include:
Development Fees Total 30,510 19.5 26,473 16.7 27,047 16.5 31,193 17.8 27,828 15.7
Interest 1,883 1.2 1,898 1.2 1,913 1.2 1,928 1.1 1,943 1.1
Grants (Other Govts) 3,991 2.6 4,829 3.0 3,691 2.2 4,855 2.8 4,531 2.6
Property Sales 1,500 1.0 1,500 0.9 1,500 0.9 1,500 0.9 1,000 0.6
37,884 24.2 34,700 21.8 34,151 20.8 39,476 22.5 35,302 19.9
OBJECTIVES & POLICIES
Property Tax Revenue
Property tax revenue is the City’s primary revenue source, and one which is heavily reliant on the
residential class. Diversification of the tax base and generation of non-tax revenue are ongoing
objectives, outlined in Financial Sustainability Policy 5.52 section 6.
The Financial Plan includes property tax increases that are as listed below:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
General Purpose 2.10% 1.90% 1.90% 2.00% 2.00%
Infrastructure Replacement 0.50% 0.70% 0.70% 0.70% 0.70%
Parks & Recreation 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25%
Drainage 0.30% 0.30% 0.30% 0.30% 0.30%
Total Property Tax Increase 3.15% 3.15% 3.15% 3.25% 3.25%
Additional information on the tax increases and the cost drivers can be found in the most recent
Financial Plan Overview Report. Specific policies discussing the tax increases are included in the
Financial Sustainability Plan and related policies which were adopted in 2004.
Property tax revenue includes property taxes as well as grants in lieu of property taxes.
Parcel Charges
Parcel charges comprise of a recycling charge, a sewer charge and on some properties, a local area
service or improvement charge. Parcel charges are a useful tool to charge all or a subset of
properties for a fixed or variable amount to support services. Unlike property taxation the variable
amount does not need to be related to property assessment value, but can be something that more
accurately reflects the cost of the service.
Attachment to Maple Ridge 2016-2020 Financial Plan Bylaw 7194-2015
Statement 2 (cont.)
Revenue and Property Tax Policy Disclosure
Fees & Charges
The Business Planning Guidelines call for an increase of 5% in fees as a guideline. Actual fee
increases vary depending on the individual circumstances, the type of fee and how it is calculated.
Fees should be reviewed annually and updated if needed. Recent fee amendments include
recreation fees, development application fees, business license fees and cemetery fees. A major
amendment to the Development Costs Charges (DCC), recommended no more frequently than every
five years, was completed in 2008. Minor DCC amendments are done more frequently. Some fees
are used to offset the costs of providing specific services. The utility fees are reviewed annually with
a view towards using rate stabilization practices to smooth out large fluctuations in rates, as set out
in the Business Planning Guidelines.
Borrowing Proceeds
Debt is used where it makes sense. Caution is used when considering debt as it commits future
cash flows to debt payments restricting the ability to use these funds to provide other services. The
source of the debt payments needs to be considered as does the justification for advancing the
project. More information on borrowing previously approved can be found in the most recent
Financial Plan Overview report.
Other Sources
This will vary greatly year to year as it includes:
• Development fees which fund capital projects from the DCC Reserve
• Contribution from others in relation to capital
• Grants which are sought from various agencies and may be leveraged with City funds
PROPERTY TAX DISCLOSURE
The 2016 property tax revenue and updated rates will be included in a Financial Plan Amending
Bylaw that proceeds the Property Tax Rate Bylaw, as the 2016 property assessed values are not yet
finalized. For information purposes the 2015 distribution is included.
Property Tax Revenue Distribution
Property Class Taxation Revenue Assessed Value Tax Rate Multiple
('000s) ('000s) ($/1000) (Rate/Res.Rate)
1 Residential 53,677 77.9%
12,004,518 91.1%
4.4713
1.0
2 Utility 540 0.8%
13,495 0.1%
40.0000
8.9
4 Major Industry 573 0.8%
17,230 0.1%
33.2682
7.4
5 Light Industry 2,808 4.1%
228,203 1.7%
12.3038
2.8
6 Business/Other 11,082 16.1%
900,715 6.8%
12.3038
2.8
8 Rec./ Non-Profit 38 0.1%
2,901 0.0%
13.1537
2.9
9 Farm 157 0.2%
4,905 0.0%
31.9560
7.1
Total 68,875 100%
13,171,968 100%
Attachment to Maple Ridge 2016-2020 Financial Plan Bylaw 7194-2015
Statement 2 (cont.)
Revenue and Property Tax Policy Disclosure
PROPERTY TAX DISCLOSURE
Objectives & Policies
Property taxes are the City’s largest source of revenue and are contained by efficient business
practices. Annual business planning practices are the mechanism for resource allocation decisions.
The City’s Financial Sustainability Policy section 6 discusses the necessity of diversifying the tax
base. Development of employment related properties is one method of diversification; therefore a
key performance measurement in Strategic Economic Initiatives tracks the increased investment
and development of non-residential properties.
A policy in the Financial Sustainability Plan that calls for stable tax increases and the adoption of the
annual increase early in the prior year in the Business Planning Guidelines provides citizens with a
more stable and predictable set of cost increases. In some cases costs are phased in over multiple
years to stay within the set tax increases.
Property Tax Rates
It is policy to adjust property tax rates annually to negate the impact of fluctuations in the market
values of properties. Tax rates are reduced to negate the market increases. Property tax increases
are then applied at the same relative increase for all classes, unless legislation restricts the rates, as
with Class 2, Utility.
The Business Class and Light Industry Class properties have the same tax rate and are treated as a
composite class when setting the tax rates, as the types of businesses in each class are similar.
A review was done on the Major Industry Class rates and the recommendation from the Audit and
Finance Committee and Council was a 5% property tax reduction in both 2009 and 2010 to support
additional investments in the subject property and to keep rates competitive. As part of the Financial
Planning discussions in December, 2013 Council authorized $70,000 each year for five years, 2014-
2018, to reduce the Major Industrial Class property tax rate. Council’s direction for the 2016-2020
Financial Plan was to discontinue further reduction in property taxes as Council revisits priorities.
In reviewing the tax rates to ensure competitiveness, absolute rates, tax multiples and overall tax
burden are considered. The impact that assessed values have when comparing other geographical
areas must be considered in a comparison of tax rates.
Permissive Tax Exemptions
Council has set policies around the use of permissive tax exemptions. These are Council Policies
5.19 through 5.24. These policies discuss Churches, Community Halls, Heritage Sites, Homes for
the Care of Children and the Relief of the Aged, the Poor, the Disabled and the Infirm, Municipal
Recreational Services, Private Hospitals and Daycares, Private School and Youth Recreation Groups.
Revitalization Tax Exemption Program
The Employment Land Investment Incentive Program is designed to encourage job creation by
supporting private investment in buildings and infrastructure on identified "employment lands".
More information on this tax exemption can be found on our website.
Attachment to Maple Ridge 2016-2020 Financial Plan Bylaw 7194-2015
Statement 3
Capital Expenditure Disclosure
The sole purpose of this statement is to meet legislative requirements and highlight the value of the
DCC program; no other conclusions should be drawn from the figures as the information could be
misleading. This disclosure is required under the Local Government Act s. 937(2); Capital costs
attributable to projects to be partially funded by Development Cost Charges (DCC) must be included
in the financial plan. The DCC program includes projects as far out as 2035 so the capital
expenditures must be extended to match. Certain types of projects are not planned past the five
year time horizon of the financial plan. Much less scrutiny is given to projects that are planned in
years 2021 through 2035. Projects in these years typically exceed likely funding available.
Capital Works Program for 2021 – 2035
(in $ thousands)
Capital Works Program 303,585
Source of Funding
Development Fees
Development Cost Charges 120,537
Parkland Acquisition Reserve -
Contribution from Others 6,635
127,173
Borrowing Proceeds 2,091
Grants 41,229
Transfer from Reserve Funds
Capital Works Reserve 13,163
Cemetery Reserve 115
Equipment Replacement Reserve -
Fire Department Capital Reserve 2,486
Recycling Reserve -
Transfer from Reserve Funds 15,764
Revenue Funds 117,328
Source of Funding 303,585
1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COW
SUBJECT: Festivals and Special Events Review Process
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In the Council Work Plan, the broad topic of festivals and special events was highlighted for discussion.
The intention of this report is to provide Council with information on the current structure of special
events/festivals and a proposed outline of the review process. The experiences and benefits derived
from festivals and events have significant value to citizens and visitors and are a vital ingredient in
Maple Ridge’s on-going development as an active and vibrant city. It is timely to assess the merits, gaps
and shortfalls of the current approach and structure and to identify recommendations for future strategic
development. The recommendations developed will shape a new special event strategy that contributes
to meeting future growth, fostering creativity and celebrating the unique character of the community.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Festival and Special Event review process outlined in the report dated December 7, 2015 be
approved.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Maple Ridge is home to a diverse range of special events year round, many of which have
matured and new ones have been added, reflecting the growth of the city and demand for
celebrations that generate civic pride and community engagement. Some of the city’s larger
events such as Country Fest, Canada Day, Caribbean Festival, Santa Parade and Children’s
Festival attract not only local residents but also visitors from other communities. To sustain
continued success and a healthy community, individual volunteers, businesses and the
municipality all have a role to play.
The types of special events range from small grassroots to mid-sized and large events that focus
on arts and culture, popular active events, and seasonal celebrations. The events take place in
Memorial Peace Park, Albion Fairgrounds and throughout city streets as well as park and trail
networks for active events such as runs and bike-a-thons. In 2015, an estimated sixty-two
special events will have taken place in Maple Ridge with an estimated total of 175,000 people
attending these events. The chart of statistics provides details and the current listing of both
active and festival events that were received and processed this year (attached).
In addition Maple Ridge special events were awarded approximately $35,631 in festival financial
grant funding. The reported total special events budget (cash) from applicants is estimated at
$600,000 which excludes the many in-kind contributions for their events such as volunteer
hours and services from business/groups. A typical event can take hundreds of hours to plan,
promote and execute, and for larger events, as many as hundreds of volunteers may be required
to host the celebration. Site safety and security regulations, risk assessments, insurance and
ancillary costs continue to escalate with more and more demands placed on the volunteer event
organizers.
1151
2
Festivals/special events involve a number of civic programs and services that are inter-related
and inter-dependent, identified, contracted and carried out through the CDPR Division
agreement or by various departments, i.e. RCMP, Fire, Communications, Engineering,
Operations, Bylaws.
The Division policies provide direction for the development, management and resource
allocations of financial grants and in-kind municipal services for special events and festivals.
The relevant policies include the Festival Support Policy P100, the Volunteer Policy P127, and
the Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD) Policy P092 (see attached for details). The
objectives and goals in each policy supports the City’s Official Community Plan 2014 and the
Parks and Leisure Master Plan 2010 arm to build a unique community character, encourage
strong community engagement and participation and develops a vibrant and healthy community.
Generally, city support for special events falls into two categories:
Supporting or background role – City staff assist a community group or non-profit who will
take the lead in planning and running the festival (most of the current special events fall into
this category) or,
Direct service delivery role – City staff play a key role in the planning and direct execution of
the event (example is the protocol events such as Canada Day and Remembrance Day and
the City’s anniversary celebration).
Further detail about the current structure is outlined in the attached overview document.
Proposed Review Process
The proposed review process of special events/festival s will be inclusive and engaging to assess
the merits, gaps and shortfalls of the current approach and structure and identify
recommendations for future development to ensure that resources and investments are
appropriate to maximize the benefit to the community and its growth. Some of the work that is
proposed includes the following as part of the business plan:
Workshop with Council to develop review criteria.
Gather community stakeholder feedback.
Consultation and workshops to be conducted with the wider community from event
organizers to Tourism, Economic Development, Business Improvement Association,
businesses and event participants through focus groups, surveys and opportunities that may
be presented at the Events Expo in January 2016. Recommendations to be implemented in
Quarter 1 2016.
Research and comparative analysis of other festival delivery models and best practices in
similar sized municipalities across Canada (sampling of 6 to 8) which is currently in progress.
Findings and recommendations report to Council.
Through the review process, recommendations will emerge that will help better define and shape
special event policies and procedures and develop an events strategy that nurtures “Celebrate
Maple Ridge,” capitalizes on opportunities and encourages a more coordinated approach to
events.
b) Desired Outcome:
That these special events/festivals will continue to be accessible and diverse and be coordinated to
support tourism and economic development opportunities which can develop a unique “Celebrate
Maple Ridge” approach.
3
c) Strategic Alignment:
In alignment with the Parks, Recreation and Culture Master Plan 2010, special events and festivals
contribute towards recognizing Maple Ridge as having a rich arts and culture scene and building a
healthy, vibrant and engaged community. Special events are opportunities for citizens to be actively
engaged and to contribute to quality of life and attracting new residents and visitors.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Supporting event organizers and groups in the provision of special events/festivals provides
opportunities for the building of both individual and community capacity. The experiences and
benefits derived from festivals and events have significant value to citizens and visitors – promotes
citizen engagement, strengthens sense of communi ty and increases social capital.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
Special events are handled across many civic departments and the work to support the success of
special events will be shared collaboratively through the IMEC Committee which has representatives
from relevant departments including Economic Development.
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The recommendations that are formulated through this process review may have financial and
procedural implications that will be presented for Council’s consideration at the completion of the
review in the spring of 2016.
CONCLUSIONS:
City supported special events have evolved over time; some are stronger and more relevant then others
and some are reinventing themselves. A strategy and plan to grow events that are uniquely Maple
Ridge, to coordinate marketing and messaging and to capitalize on opportunitie s is needed. A critical
analysis of festivals and events provides this opportunity for improvement and strengthens the quality of
events and experiences.
“Original signed by David Boag” for
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Yvonne Chui, Manager Arts and Community Connections
“Original signed by Wendy McCormick”
_______________________________________________
Reviewed by: Wendy McCormick, Director of Recreation
“Original signed by Kelly Swift”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Kelly Swift, General Manager,
Community Development Parks & Recreation Services
“Original signed by Ted Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence by: Ted Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
yc:wmc
Attachments:
Special Events Statistics 2015
Overview of Current Structure in Festivals & Events
Commission Policies P100, P127 and P092
Maple Ridge Festival and Volunteer Statistics 2015
Number of Festivals/Special Events in Maple Ridge
(including active events)62
Represents 62% of total estimated events in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows
Special Event Volunteering & Attendance Statistics
Number of Volunteers for Festivals/Events (reported)1,250 volunteers
Number of Volunteer Hours on Event Days in 2015 *25,000 hours
*estimate and excludes pre-event planning and prep work
Estimated Total Attendance Number in 2015 175,000 people
City Festivals Grant Allocations:
Caribbean Festival $5,000
Country Fest $5,000
Maple Ridge Children's Festival $2,000
Adstock $700
Haney Farmer's Market $1,500
River's Day $1,500
GETIfest $500
Canada Day $4,300
Remembrance Day $1,500
Christmas Haven $1,000
Christmas Parade & Festival $5,000
Earth Day $1,500
Bard in Spirit Square $3,000
Grassroots and new events $4,880
Total MR Allocation at 76% of Festivals Grant Budget $37,380
$ Reported Festivals & Special Events Budgets from Applicants (cash)$600,000
(festivals approx. $370,000 and active events approx. $230,000)
Other Support Services to Festivals & Special Events (Cash and In-Kind)
Volunteer Recognition and Training Opportunities $10,000
PLS staff and in-kind support of special events in 2015**$250,000
**(This is an informed estimate based on feedback from staff to support
meetings and prep, day of event site work, applications process, PLS
promotion services, operating hours etc.). Staff time is not tracked for
individual events.
NOTE: estimates to year end based on historical information and information submitted
[1]
Overview of Current Structure:
Special Events, Festivals and Volunteers Section of Parks and Leisure Services
Festivals/Special Events and Volunteer Office:
The PLS Festival/Special Event and Volunteer staff (2.5 FTE)support the full range of special
events and community building initiatives using an asset-based community development
approach for Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows. Working in partnership with the Community
Festival Network (CFN) and the Intra-Municipal Events Committee, the Festival/Special
Event and Volunteer staff provide support to volunteer-driven organizations and groups with
the following services:
Facilitating committee and volunteer program development as liaisons.
Creating event, site and safety plans and providing technical and logistical expertise .
Overseeing facility bookings, park rentals for special events, equipment delivery and
event set up & tear down.
Promoting events by collecting and coordinating relevant details and posting to the City’s
website, social media and readerboards.Includes work on marketing campaigns linked
to key seasonal times for special events/festivals (eg. summer, Christmas, Easter).
Connecting and developing resources including guide manuals and sponsorship lists.
Researching and facilitating educational workshops on leadership, fund development,
and other trending topics.
Facilitating Commission’s semi-annual review and making recommendations for the
Festival Support Grant program.
Coordinating the Intra-Municipal Events Committee (IMEC) team to support an efficient
event approval process and facilitate effective communications.
Managing volunteer program for PLS and community partners including volunteer
recognition, registration, orientation, training and support.
Groups and organizations go through many life cycle stages of being grassroots, start up,
growth, maturity, decline and renewal. Festivals and Volunteers staff support ensures
continuity and a sliding scale of support based on the group’s needs and the complexity of
the proposed special event.
Community Festival Network (CFN) Partnership:
The CFN is a leadership committee of volunteer event organizers in both communities that is
committed to “encouraging sharing, communication, collaboration and cooperation between
groups hosting local events.” Festivals/Special Events and Volunteer staff provide facilitative
support with meetings, training and planning and implementation of projec ts identified that
may have a collective impact or problem solving exercise for the coalition to achieve
successful events,e.g. workshops on safe route mapping and food vendor safety
requirements.
Intra-Municipal Events Committee (IMEC):
The IMEC consists of municipal staff in each community that represents
departments/services involved in special events including RCMP, Fire, Engineering,
Communications,Bookings, Risk Management, Economic Development and Parks. The
committee meets quarterly (or more as needed) to discuss event safety and the approval
process for event road closures, safety plans and resources. This committee is committed to
ensuring the approval process for events is as smooth and streamlined as possible, while
ensuring safety and other logistics and legal obligations/responsibilities are met.
Festival/Special Event and Volunteer staff are responsible for supporting, collecting and
[2]
coordinating the event applications and approvals process on an on -going basis throughout
the year. Collectively, they have developed a streamlined and coordinated process and
procedures to vet all applications under IMEC which is similar to the concept of a “one stop
shop” rather than going through many applications and processes for different departments
which used to be past practise. It supports the goal to provide efficient and effective
customer service and to minimize municipal risks.
Festival Support Grant Program:
The Commission has established a policy on festival support (P100). Financial and in-kind
municipal support is provided to qualified special event groups in accordance with guidelines
established through a festivals support grant program. Through this policy and program, a
number of objectives are met including:
A vibrant and diverse range of festivals and events.
Opportunities to celebrate history, living heritage and diverse cultural character.
Growth of volunteerism and citizen engagement.
Growth of tourism and attracting businesses and people interested in active and vibrant
communities.
Safe communities.
The intention of the grant is to recognize the value annual events have in building community
and lasting legacies and to act as an incentive for event organizers to grow, enhance and
improve their event. The grant places the City in a strong facilitative role, encouraging
organizers to work with staff in the development of their event. Financial grants are available
on an annual basis pending available resources and Commission approval of budget to
small, mid-sized and large recurring festivals which have submitted an application request
(exception is the protocol events such as Canada Day and Remembrance Day).Below is a
brief list of some typical events in a calendar year based on size and complexity:
Small –estimated attendance under 300, simple site requirements, single day event and no
road closures. Examples are the grassroots and new events including Summer Serenade,
Pianos on the Street, Adstock and GetiFest.
Medium –estimated attendance under 2,000, moderate site requirements, road closures
requested with some impact on residents or traffic flow, full or partial park closure, single day
event, special occasion licensed area, and traffic management plan required. Examples
include Haney Farmers Market, Bard in the Park and Earth Day.
Large -estimated attendance over 2,000 and up to 20,000, complex site requirements,
multiple days, road closure with impact to traffic flow and residents, full or partial park
closure, special occasion license associated with event, traffic management plan to be
implemented. Examples are Country Fest, Caribbean Festival and Christmas Parade.
In 2015,Maple Ridge special events were awarded an estimated amount of $35,631 in
festival financial grant funding. Applicants indicated using the grants largely towards the
costs for insurance and safety obligations and additional municipal services not covered
under the program such as additional booking of facilities prior to or post event or electrical
requirements.Municipal grant support in the medium and large categories typically
contributes approximately 5 to 10% to their overall event budget (cash) and for the smaller
events up to 30%.At the same time they have reported improving, enhancing and growing
their events. The reported total special events budget (cash) from applicants is estimated at
[3]
$600,000 which excludes the many in-kind contributions for their events such as volunteer
hours and services from business/groups.
Aside from municipal government, event organizers seek additional funding for the majority of their
expenses from corporations/businesses, private individuals, foundations and other levels of
government. They have reported that support from municipal government through in-kind and
financial grants are essential to their success in meeting fundraising targets as the su pport provides
credibility with other funders and sponsors. Maple Ridge has a long tradition of providing family
friendly community events that are at no or low cost and the event organizers work hard to continue
this tradition.
Volunteer Program:
The goal of the city’s volunteer program is to foster, inspire and celebrate individual, group and
business participation in volunteerism that strengthens and builds a healthy, resilient and vibrant
community and contributes to the health and well-being of citizens using the ABCD approach.
Festival/Special Event and Volunteer staff are responsible to support volunteer program
development, training, evaluation and recognition activities related to the City. In addition staff
works with community partners on volunteer development for their special events and community
wide goals on volunteerism.
P100_Festival_Support_Policy_2014-02-13_7263853 1
Title:POLICY: FESTIVAL SUPPORT Policy No.P100
Supercedes:2010-09-09
Authority:Operational Effective Date:2014-02-13
Approval:PLS Commission Review Date:2014-02-13
Policy Statement:
Parks and Leisure Services will support the growth and development of festivals and events by
utilizing the community development approach to build community capacity and vibrancy .Financial
and in-kind support will be provided to qualified festival groups in accordance with guidelines
established by the Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure Services.
PURPOSE:
Festivals and events enhance citizen’s quality of life and are an essential element in creating complete
communities. The experiences and benefits derived from festivals and events have significant value by
citizens and visitors and are a vital ingredient in the municipality’s on-going development as an active and
vibrant City.
Applications for festivals support will be assessed based on benefits criteria to the community that
includes:
Encouraging community identity and spirit
Providing opportunities for economic development
Building community involvement
Demonstrating a sense of responsibility to the community
Events will encourage community development that builds the capacity of local residents and the power of
local associations and institutions which contributes to a stronger, more sustainable community for the
future.
The policy will contribute to developing increased vibrancy and community sustainability in Maple Ridge
and Pitt Meadows. Through this policy, Commission is committed to supporting:
A vibrant and diverse range of festivals and events
Opportunities to celebrate history, living heritage and diverse cultural character
Growth of volunteerism
Growth of tourism and attracting businesses and people interested in active and vibrant
communities
Safe communities
POLICY MANUAL
P100_Festival_Support_Policy_2014-02-13_7263853 2
This policy provides a foundation for the development, management and resource allocation of grants and
services through Parks and Leisure Services by:
Articulating a clear definition of festivals supported by the Commission.
Establishing guidelines that ensure consistent implementation of the policy when reviewing
requests for financial and in-kind support from qualified festival groups through the Festivals Sub-
Committee and Inter-Municipal Events Committee. All requests will be considered within the context
of available resources and benefits to the community.
Commission annually appointing a Festivals Sub-Committee (3 members of Parks and Leisure
Services Commission) to work with staff and review applications and make recommendations for
Festival Support Funding allocation to be considered by Commission.
DEFINITIONS:
Definitions:
Festival:
A free or low-cost volunteer-driven celebration, entertainment or activity that is accessible, promotes
community spirit, identity and responsibility and is promoted to the general public including Maple Ridge
and Pitt Meadows residents and tourists. For the purpose of clarity and this policy, the term “festival” does
not include sporting events, tournaments,artistic competitions or exhibits, religious causes or commercial
events.
Qualified festival group:
A Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows based festival group or a group in the region with a Maple Ridge and/or
Pitt Meadows partner, registered as a non-profit society, or similar group with the potential to become a
non-profit society, that has made application and agrees to enter into a grant agreement for activities that
take place in Maple Ridge and/or Pitt Meadows.
Available resources:
The budget established through the Parks and Leisure Services Commission to support qualified Maple
Ridge and Pitt Meadows festival groups, plus in-kind allocations including parks, facility and equipment use
or staff time provided by the Commission, the Parks and Leisure Services Festival and Volunteer Office,or
other Municipal Departments
Base level of support:
The level of support available to any and all qualified festival groups in accordance with available
resources, the fees and charges policy and operational procedures. It is the responsibility of festival
organizers to develop, plan, manage, fund and implement their festival.
Benefits Criteria Definitions:
Encourages community identity and spirit:
Involves citizens in planning creatively for the community. Enhances the image and reputation of the
community by contributing to a vibrant and creative environment that attracts citizens, visitors and
business.
Grows economic opportunities:
Draws a critical mass opportunity, attracting a large number of attendees including tourists. Provides
opportunities for business to network with or promote their services to the community in a positive
environment.
P100_Festival_Support_Policy_2014-02-13_7263853 3
Builds community involvement:
Increases the range of experiences available to residents and visitors through cultural, recreational and
educational components. Provides an environment for public gathering, mingling and safe celebration and
increases residents’ sense of belonging and comfort in participating in their community that includes
access to these activities through inclusive practices and low-cost opportunities.
Demonstrates a sense of responsibility to the community:
Uses sound financial practices and has sources of revenue other than from the Commission.
Demonstrates environmental stewardship. Supports local business and community projects. Ensures
safety is a primary consideration when planning and staging festivals. Incorporates a range of quality
opportunities for volunteer engagement, training and leadership development that helps to fulfill the
group’s mission and vision.
REFERENCE:
Fees and Charges Policy
Community Development Policy
This policy is subject to any specific provisions of the Municipal Act,or other relevant legislation or
Union Agreement.
P127_Volunteer_Policy_2014-09-11_7264954 1
Title:VOLUNTEER POLICY Policy No.P127
Supercedes:2003-04
Authority:Operational Effective Date:2014-09-11
Approval:PLS Commission Review Date:2014-09-11
Policy Statement:
The Commission values volunteers and believes:that volunteerism promotes citizen
engagement,social and civic responsibility and civic pride;contributes to healthy,vibrant and
caring communities;and,improves quality of life as there are benefits at individual and
community levels.
Therefore,the Commission will support volunteers and volunteerism in Maple Ridge and Pitt
Meadows;provide positive,meaningful volunteer experiences;encourage the support of
volunteerism and diverse volunteer opportunities in both communities and work with volunteer
community groups to strengthen and recognize volunteerism.
VOLUNTEER POLICY
Purpose and Guiding Principles
1.1.Purpose
The purpose of the volunteer policy for the Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows Parks and Leisure
Services Commission (Commission)is to recognize the essential role that volunteers and
volunteerism plays in building a healthy,caring and vibrant community and contributes to the
health and well-being of citizens.The policy recognizes:
The role that volunteers and volunteerism contributes in making Maple Ridge and Pitt
Meadows a community of choice for individuals and businesses.
The importance of strengthening volunteerism in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows.
That volunteerism contributes to community capacity building and as such aligns with the
Asset Based Community Development policy (P092).
The importance of providing quality,meaningful and rewarding experiences for
individuals who volunteer with the municipality.
POLICY MANUAL
This policy is subject to any specific provisions of the Municipal Act,or other relevant legislation or
Union Agreement.
P127_Volunteer_Policy_2014-09-11_7264954 2
That developing systems and processes that support municipal volunteers and
volunteerism by implementing best practices is essential for effective and consistent
management of volunteers.
The importance of strengthening relationships and supporting connections through the
development of networks among volunteer community groups and individuals.
Providing a framework for municipal volunteers to complement and/or enhance
municipal services and fulfill work plan goals through the sharing of skills,ideas,
connections,energy and time.
1.2.Guiding Principles
Promoting volunteer involvement and contribution to community has powerful potential to
positively impact society,communities,organizations and individuals.Meaningful,abundant,
and accessible volunteer opportunities are vital to a healthy,inclusive,resilient and
democratic community.
The following principles reflect the input from local community volunteers and organizations,
as well as align with the principles and standards outlined in the Canadian Code for
Volunteer Involvement (2012).The application of the following Guiding Principles will assist
in developing volunteer opportunities that support the development of a healthy community:
Asset-Based
We believe that promoting volunteerism is critical to identifying and connecting local
strengths and assets,skills,talents,and perspectives that are essential to responding to
community challenges while strengthening the social fabric that contributes to a healthy,
vibrant and sustainable community.
Relationships
We believe that volunteerism promotes strong relationships,both individual and community,
that contribute to building a healthy connected and engaged community.
Engaged
We believe that volunteerism promotes a sense of belonging and has a positive impact on a
person’s social,physical and emotional well-being.Community engagement through
volunteerism provides opportunities for citizens to “make a difference”which ultimately
contributes to their personal well-being.
Inclusive
We value the contribution of all citizens and are committed to ensuring that everyone has a
voice and space to contribute to community quality of life.We recognize and promote the
richness achieved through meaningful and diverse participation and we take responsibility
for recognizing and diminishing the barriers that prevent citizens from contributing.
Collective Community Building
We believe that volunteerism promotes civic engagement and active participation in shaping
our community.We believe that connecting volunteers and volunteer community groups
increases the capacity to accomplish collective goals that are responsive and reflective of
community needs and interests.
This policy is subject to any specific provisions of the Municipal Act,or other relevant legislation or
Union Agreement.
P127_Volunteer_Policy_2014-09-11_7264954 3
Responsibility
We believe that volunteerism is an avenue for connecting people to the causes they care
about and that through community participation citizens are encouraged and supported to
take responsibility and contribute to the health and wellness of the community.
Standards of Volunteer Involvement:
Parks and Leisure Services is committed to ensuring that volunteer involvement supported
by the department adheres to the following standards.In addition,Parks and Leisure
Services is committed to encouraging and supporting partner organizations and community
groups and organizations to achieve such standards:
Volunteers are recognized as a vital human resource in achieving civic mission and
community vision.
Appropriate infrastructure and organizational practices are adopted to support
volunteers and volunteerism.
A safe and supportive environment is available to all volunteers.
That committed volunteers are accountable to the organization(s)or groups that they are
involved in.
Policies and procedures are in place to provide a framework that defines and supports
the involvement of volunteers within the organization including risk management and
operating procedures.
Qualified staff are designated to be responsible for the overall volunteer program and the
supervision of specific volunteer programs and volunteers within the organization.
A registration and screening process is clearly communicated and consistently delivered.
Volunteer assignments are meaningful and rewarding,reflecting the various abilities,
needs and backgrounds of volunteers and the mission and vision of the
organization/group.
Volunteer recruitment and selection reaches out to diverse sources of volunteers through
the local Volunteer Centre and other resources.
Volunteer opportunities,branding and messaging are developed in collaboration with
voluntary community groups to create an integrated system that supports great volunteer
experiences,connections and capacity building.
Volunteers receive appropriate orientation,its policies and procedures,and receive
training for their volunteer assignment(s)and to build their leadership and skills.
Volunteers receive appropriate levels of supervision according to their task and are given
regular opportunities to receive and give feedback.
Volunteers are welcomed and treated as valuable and integral members of the
broader municipal team.
The contributions of volunteers are regularly acknowledged with formal and
informal recognition methods.
This policy is subject to any specific provisions of the Municipal Act,or other relevant legislation or
Union Agreement.
P127_Volunteer_Policy_2014-09-11_7264954 4
2.0 Definitions
Asset-Based Community Development:this approach considers local assets as the primary
building blocks of sustainable community development.Building on the skills of local
residents,the strengthening of local associations,and the supportive functions of local
institutions,asset-based community development draws upon existing community strengths
to build stronger,more sustainable communities for the future.
The principles of ABCD approach include:
Asset-Based –build on positives,strengths,and opportunities.
Relationship-Driven –centered on the people in the community working together.
Locally-Focused –place-based.
ABCD recognizes that,in order to be truly effective,citizens must join the effort as co-
creators and co-producers of their own,and their community’s,well-being.The essence of
ABCD is Discover,Ask and Connect:
Discover the skills (gifts)and passions of the participants;often it is assisting them in
discovering their own gifts;
Ask them to share those gifts,and
Encourage them to Connect with other people with the same passions and to work
collectively for the common good.
Canadian Code for Volunteer Involvement:developed during the International Year of the
Volunteer in 2001,is a framework for decision making.The Code is based on values,guiding
principles,and organization standards.It was updated in 2012 to reflect changing landscape
of volunteerism.
Voluntary Community Groups:are non-profit groups or organizations that exist to serve the
public benefit,are typically governed by a voluntary board of directors,and depend on
volunteers to carry out essential parts of the groups’or organizations’work.
Volunteer:anyone who offers time,energy,and skills of his or her own free will for the
mutual benefit of the volunteer and the organization or group.Volunteers work without
financial compensation,or the expectation of financial compensation beyond an agreed-
upon reimbursement for expenses.
Volunteering or voluntary action:refers to activities carried out by individuals,of their own
free will,to shape and/or enhance their communities.Volunteer includes people assisting
others,both formally and informally.
P092_Asset_Based_Comty_Dev_2014-04-10_7266EBE 1
Title:ASSET BASED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT POLICY Policy No.P092
Supercedes:1998-06
Authority:Operational Effective Date:2014-04-10
Approval:PLS Commission Review Date:2014-04-10
Policy Statement:
Parks and Leisure Services will utilize an Asset-Based Community Development approach in the
provision of leisure services to inspire, encourage, and support citizens, community organizations,
and networks to work collectively to build individual and community capacity to enhance the quality
of life.
PURPOSE:
The Parks and Leisure Services’ community development approach considers local assets as the
primary building blocks of sustainable community development. The principles of ABCD are rooted in
the assumption that communities have strengths rather than deficiencies, assets rather than needs,
and possibilities rather than problems. Building on the skills of local residents, the power of local
associations, and the supportive functions of local institutions, ABCD draws upon existing communi ty
strengths to build stronger, more sustainable communities for the future.
This approach values the engagement and participation of all citizens and recognizes the richness
achieved through diversity of perspectives. Careful attention is taken to remove the barriers that
prevent people from participating in the issues that affect their lives. The focus is on building
leadership capacity in order to support and encourage community groups and organizations to work
collectively to:
i)identify their own strengths, assets, passions, rights, and responsibilities;
ii)connect with others’ assets by building relationships which support, sustain, encourage, and
value each participant;
iii)learn, plan, organize, make decisions and take action with others collectively, in relation to the
things that concern or interest them;
iv)and together, assess the effect of any actions taken.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES:
Asset-Based:
We believe that all citizens have “gifts”, talents and skills and that people can and want to contribute
and that they are healthier when they contribute. We believe in providing opportunities that
encourage both individual and community capacity building.
POLICY MANUAL
P092_Asset_Based_Comty_Dev_2014-04-10_7266EBE 2
Relationships:
We believe that strong relationships are at the core of a healthy community. We believe in investing
in building and nurturing strong mutually respectful relationships.
Inclusive:
We value the engagement and participation by all citizens and recognize the richness achieved
through diversity of perspectives.We take responsibility for recognizing and removing the barriers
that prevent people from participating in the issues that affect their lives.
Connections:
We believe in the “giving of gifts”. We believe that the gifts, talents and skills in the commun ity are
boundless and that supporting processes that promote sharing of assets it critical.
Grassroots:
We value, respect, nurture and encourage the community to identify their own priorities, to learn
together and collectively play a leadership role in its own development.
Collective:
We believe in the “power of association”. We believe that when community assets are connected
they become amplified,magnified, productive and celebrated. The connection of assets is essential
to community health, wellness, and resiliency.
BENEFITS:
Utilizing the Asset-Based Community Development approach enables Parks and Leisure Services to
create opportunities for connections that build on existing strengths and assets and contributes to
building citizen, community organizations, networks, and associations’ capacity.
Investing in Individual Capacity Building:
Investing time and attention to individual citizens’ development of their personal skills, knowledge
and abilities is vital to the health of the community and the successful development of leaders in
community processes. The personal development of individuals ‘gifts’ and talents and can be
nurtured through the creation of opportunities that contribute to building:
Sense of Self ( self esteem)
Sense of Competence
Sense of Belonging
Sense of Purpose
Sense of Power (empowerment)
Sense of Empathy (opportunity to practice compassion)
P092_Asset_Based_Comty_Dev_2014-04-10_7266EBE 3
Investing in Community Capacity Building:
Community capacity building ensures that communities take control of their own learning in a way
that enables them to effectively address the needs and issues that are on their own agendas.
Supporting capacity building of community organizations,networks and associations contributes to:
increased knowledge, skills and confidence through either/both informal and formal learning
and training opportunities and citizens are validated as worthwhile, capable people.
the community feeling more confident and powerful and embracing a more positive self -image;
the community displaying a “can do” attitude, seeing possibilities and not just problems;
citizens see themselves as the potential producers of their own well being;
through participation and networking, citizens seeing that they are not alone, that there are
partners for them in community work;
and the development of structures, systems, and mechanisms to support ongoing collective
approaches to enable community to address issues and/or capitalize on opportunities.
Supporting Opportunities for Individual and Community Benefits to Develop:
This policy recognizes that in order to achieve the benefits of collective impact, the support of a
backbone organization is critical. Parks and Leisure Services serves this role by taking responsibility
to connect and support coordination of the structures, systems, and mechanisms related to services
it provides in the community.
DEFINITIONS:
Community Development:
Broadly, community development is a collective approach by a group of people to undertake projects
of their choice that will bring about positive change. This activity is informed by a set of values that
underpin the approach to the work. These values are:equality, self-determination, working and
learning together, sustainable communities, participation, and reflective practice.
Asset-Based Community Development:
This approach considers local assets as the primary building blocks of sustainable community
development. Building on the skills of local residents, the strengthening, of local associations, and
the supportive functions of local institutions, asset-based community development draws upon
existing community strengths to build stronger, more sustainable communities for the future.
The principles of ABCD approach include:
Asset-Based –build on positives, strengths, and opportunities.
Relationship-Driven –centered on the people in the community working together.
Locally-Focused –place-based.
ABCD recognizes that, in order to be truly effective, citizens must join the effort as co -creators and
co-producers of their own, and their community’s, well-being. The essence of ABCD is Discover, Ask
and Connect:
Discover the skills (gifts) and passions of the participants;often it is assisting them in
discovering their own gifts;
P092_Asset_Based_Comty_Dev_2014-04-10_7266EBE 4
Ask them to share those gifts, and
Encourage them to connect with other people with the same passions and to work collectively for
the common good.
Backbone Organization:
Creating and managing collective impact requires a separate organization(s) with staff and a specific
set of skills to serve as the backbone for the entire initiative to coordinate participating organizations
and agencies
Collective Impact:
Collective impact is achieved through the commitment of community groups from different sectors to
a common agenda that is intended to create positive impacts for community.There are five
conditions that, together, lead to meaningful results from Collective Impact: common agenda,
shared measurement, mutually reinforcing activities, continuous communication, and the support of
a backbone organization that serves to connect and coordinate participating groups and
organizations.
Results Based Accountability (RBA):
RBA provides a framework that encourages long-term thinking to support community change by
providing a method of developing and tracking performance measures that will support engaging
community in setting community-wide collective strategies.
Capacity Building:
Community capacity building describes the process of developing skills,knowledge, confidence and
structures that ensure that projects will succeed.Community capacity is the combined influence of a
community’s commitment, resources, and skills that can be deployed to build on community
strengths and address community problems and opportunities. Community capacity building
focuses on enhancing the assets and abilities of the community through a process of identification,
strengthening and linking of a community’s tangible resources (i.e. charitable service clubs) and
intangible resources (i.e. community spirit).
Social Capital:
Social Capital is the value generated by various forms of civic engagement, trust,norms of
reciprocity, networks, associations, and information sharing within a community. Social Capital:
helps information flow through the community;
encourages norms of reciprocity that compel people to help others for mutual benefit;
increases participation in democratic institutions, thereby improving their accountability;
and helps the community become resilient to economic, social and environmental changes.
Resilient Communities:
Resilient communities are healthy communities capable of “bouncing back” from adverse situations
by actively influencing and preparing for economic, social and environmental change. Building
resilient communities relies on building social capital because:
in times of need, a resilient community will draw upon all of the resources that make it a healthy
community;
P092_Asset_Based_Comty_Dev_2014-04-10_7266EBE 5
during times of crisis, social capital provides a community with an informed communications
network and access to a wide range of resources, beyond the traditional labour market.
Community Engagement:
Authentic community engagement requires significant numbers of community members and
happens when:
people in communities create structures and processes that are empowering for themselves
and others;
and people in public agencies create structures and processes that are empowering for all
citizens.
Conscious consideration must be given to removal of barriers to ensure that citizens can participate.
Community Empowerment:
Authentic community empowerment provides opportunities and processes that enable all citizens to
play an active role in the decisions that affect their communities. Assisting individuals and groups to
recognize their own ‘gifts’ and connecting them to community assets, is critical for effective
community empowerment.
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COW
SUBJECT: Subsidized Ice Allocation - Minor Sports
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In 2009, the Commission directed staff to investigate the amount of subsidized ice time available to
minor sport groups in Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge. Based on this research it was determined
that minor sport groups received less than half the amount of subsidized ice time, averaging 0.05 hours
per player per week compared to other lower mainland communities’ at 0.11 hours per player per week.
The Commission then directed staff to prepare an incremental budget package for consideration during
the 2010 business planning cycle to address the identified gap. The incremental request
recommended a 10% per annum increase in subsidized ice allocated to minor sport groups over the
following five years. The Commission agreed to do a review on completion of the five-year incremental
period.
The recent review indicated that the allocation target of 0.11 hours per player per week was almost
achieved. However, the regional average has since increased from 0.11 to 0.16 hours per player per
week. An analysis of the data indicates that there is no immediate need for an increase in the amount
of subsidized ice allocated at this time. However, the larger than average ice user associations
indicates there is a need to monitor our facility inventory going forward to plan to meet future demand.
For further statistics and details see the Commission report attached.
RECOMMENDATION:
No resolution required.
“Original signed by Wendy McCormick”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Wendy McCormick, Director of Recreation
“Original signed by Kelly Swift”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Kelly Swift, General Manager,
Community Development, Parks & Recreation Services
“Original signed by Ted Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence by: Ted Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
:wmc
Attachment: PLS Commission Report – November 12, 2015 1152
C:\Users\ingridk\AppData\Local\Temp\32\Framework\PLSC_2015-11-
12_Subsidized_Ice_Allocation_Minor_Sports_Attach_7381347.docx 1
SUBJECT:Subsidized Ice Allocation to Minor Sports
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In 2009,the Commission directed staff to investigate the amount of subsidized ice time available to
minor sport groups in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows.Based on this research it was determined
that minor sport groups received less than half the amount of subsidized ice time, averaging .05
hours per player per week compared to other lower mainland communities’at.11 hours per player
per week.The Commission then directed staff to prepare an incremental budget package for
consideration during the 2010 business planning cycle to address the identified gap.The
incremental request recommended a 10% per annum increase in subsidized ice allocated to minor
sport groups over the following five years.
This increased allocation was fully achieved in 2014 and brought Commission’s subsidized ice
allocation to .10 hours per player per week. However, the regional average has since increased from
.11 to .16 hours per player per week.In addition,staff have compared the subsidized rate per hour
and noted that Commission’s purchase price for subsidized ice is currently $3.90 per hour below the
average purchase rate.Commission provides 188 more hours of subsidized ice per season to minor
sport organizations and Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows have larger than average ice user
associations.
All the data indicates that there is no immediate need for an increase in the amount of subsidized
ice allocated by Commission at this time. However, the larger than average ice users associations
indicates that there will be a need to monitor our facility inventory going forward.
RECOMMENDATION:
No resolution required.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Minor sport groups in all communities rely on municipal ice allocations to access ice time in
order to provide recreation and sport opportunities to the community and to minor sports in
particular.At the May 2009 Commission meeting,the Ridge Meadows Minor Hockey
Association made a presentation and requested the following:
1.To protect ice time for minor sports to reduce the risk that ice time for minor sports was not
sold to other users.
2.To provide more hours at Commission’s subsidized rate.
Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows
Parks & Leisure Services Commission Report
REGULAR MEETING
November 12, 2015
C:\Users\ingridk\AppData\Local\Temp\32\Framework\PLSC_2015-11-
12_Subsidized_Ice_Allocation_Minor_Sports_Attach_7381347.docx 2
Staff did the research and determined that Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows minor sport ice users
were well below the average per player for subsidized ice. As demonstrated in the table below
Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows minor sport ice users received less than 50% of the subsidized,
ice as compared to neighbouring communities.
Municipality 2009
Port Moody 0.11
Port Coquitlam n/a
Coquitlam 0.14
Abbotsford 0.10
New Westminster n/a
Mission 0.11
Burnaby 0.11
Average 0.11
Maple Ridge & Pitt Meadows 0.05
Variance 0.06
In June of 2009,the Commission directed staff to prepare an incremental budget package for
consideration during the 2010 business planning cycle.The incremental request recommended a
10% per annum increase in subsidized ice allocated to minor sports over five years:
Year Sub. Hrs.Per Year Net Subsidy Budget Increase
2009 2,226 $333,900 0
2010 2,450 $367,500 $33,600
2011 2,694 $404,100 $36,600
2012 2,962 $444,300 $40,200
2013 3,259 $488,880 $44,580
2014 3,584 $537,600 $48,720
If minor sport membership remained static, the amount of time that Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows
allocates would have increased from 0.05 hours per player per week to 0.09, which would be
significantly closer to the average of 0.11.
The incremental package was implemented and staff have completed a review of the current status.
The assumptions identified in the 2010 incremental package and the 2009 staff report ha ve been
realized and the amount of subsidized time that Commission allocates has increased from 0.05
hours per player per week in 2009 to 0.10 hours per player per week in 2014 however,as
demonstrated below,the regional average has increased to 0.16 hours per player per week.
C:\Users\ingridk\AppData\Local\Temp\32\Framework\PLSC_2015-11-
12_Subsidized_Ice_Allocation_Minor_Sports_Attach_7381347.docx 3
Municipality Average Time Allocated Per Player
Per Week
2009 2015
Port Moody 0.11 0.22
Port Coquitlam n/a 0.11
Coquitlam 0.14 0.17
Abbotsford 0.10 0.11
New Westminster n/a n/a
Mission 0.11 0.18
Burnaby 0.11 0.14
Average 0.11 0.16
Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows 0.05 0.10
Variance 0.06 0.05
Staff also looked at the subsidized ice rate offered by these communities and found that the
Commission’s subsidized rate is $3.90 per hour below the average and that Commission provides
188 more hours of subsidized ice per year than our neighbours.The following graph also
demonstrates that our minor sport organizations are much larger than the average associations
which accounts for the discrepancy in number of hours per player per week. The numbers below
seem to demonstrate that more Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows players would be on the ice at a time
than in other communities.
It will be important to monitor these numbers going forward as the continued growth of these
organizations will result in a deficit in our ice inventory.
Municipality Rates 2015
Hours per
season 2015
#of Players in
2015
Port Moody $121.25 2,604 420
Port Coquitlam $110.00 1,806 575
Coquitlam $121.62 4,179 900
Abbotsford $116.00 2,764 875
New Westminster n/a n/a
Mission $112.90 1,834 369
Burnaby $103.66 3,199 794
Average of other Communities $114.24 2,731 655.5
Maple Ridge & Pitt Meadows $110.34 2,919 1035
Variance $3.90 -188 379.5
b)Desired Outcome:
To regularly review the amount of subsidized ice available and maintain a balance between rates
and the amount of subsidized ice available to local minor user groups, when compared to the
current regional market.To protect access to an adequate amount of ice time to serve the needs
of minor sport groups that use arenas in Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows.
C:\Users\ingridk\AppData\Local\Temp\32\Framework\PLSC_2015-11-
12_Subsidized_Ice_Allocation_Minor_Sports_Attach_7381347.docx 4
c)Strategic Alignment:
Provide high quality municipal services to our citizens and customers in a cost effective and
efficient manner.Access to ice time at a reasonable cost provides a range of recreation and
sport opportunities to local citizens and particularly to children and youth. This reflects the intent
to create a safe and livable community.
d)Citizen/Customer Implications:
Minor sport groups in all communities rely on municipal subsidies to access ice time in arenas in
order to provide recreation and sport opportunities to the community. Currently, Maple Ridge
and Pitt Meadows provide slightly lower access when compared to other communities.
e)Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The Commission’s practice is to review PLS fees and subsidies on a regular basis and to plan
regular,modest increases that reflect average market comparisons to avoid any significant
impact to patrons and user groups.
CONCLUSIONS:
Minor sport groups in all communities rely on municipal subsidies to access ice time in arenas in
order to provide recreation and sport opportunities to the community. Currently, Commission
provides slightly lower access per player per hour when compared to other communities.Although
we do not need to increase our ice subsidy at this time, it will be important to continue to monitor the
growth of our associations to ensure that our inventory is in line with the demand.
“Original signed by Danielle Pope for”
Prepared By:Don Cramb
Sr. Recreation Manager
“Original signed by Wendy McCormick
Reviewed By:Wendy McCormick
Director Recreation
“Original signed by Kelly Swift”
Approved By:Kelly Swift
General Manager, Community Development
Parks & Recreation Services
dc:wmc
1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: December 7, 2015
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C.O.W.
SUBJECT: Leisure Centre Pool Renovations Contract Award
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Bid submissions for the proposed Maple Ridge Leisure Centre Pool Improvements (ITT-PL15-67)
were received October 28, 2015. Three contractors were previously pre-qualified for a project of this
scope and all were in compliance with the requirements of the tender documents. Staff have
evaluated each of the submissions and are recommending that the renovation contract be awarded
to the lowest compliant bidder, Mierau Contractors Limited for Option 1 for the sum $4,811,062.00.
This option will necessitate the aquatic area of the Leisure Centre being closed for one year. Option
2, to phase the construction work was also considered, however it is not recommended as it and
would cost an additional $124,487.00 and would result in a longer closure. In addition the Fraser
Health Department has advised that they would not support the pool being kept open while the
construction hoarding is in place.
RECOMMENDATION:
(a) That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and execute the Construction Contract (ITT-
PL15-67) with Mierau Contractors Limited for the construction of the Maple Ridge Leisure Centre
Pool, mechanical and filtration systems for a total of $4,811,062.00, excluding GST; AND,
(b) That a contingency of 10% be established for the Construction Contract (ITT-PL15-67) in the
amount of $481,000.00 which will increase the previously proposed project budget by an
additional $271,834.00.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
On February 16, 2015, Council awarded Architectural Design Services for the Maple Ridge
Leisure Centre pool improvement project to SHAPE Architecture Inc. for a contract price of
$399,891.00 plus an $80,000.00 (20%) contingency for a total budget of $479,772 for the
detailed design phase of this project.
On May 15, 2015, staff issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ-PL15-44) for Construction
Contractors. Each bidder was asked to provide a list of comparable work experiences with
projects similar in scope and scale of the Maple Ridge Leisure Centre Pool Upgrades, including
references, subcontractors, bonding and listing key team members with mechanical pool
experience. In addition, the bidders were asked to provide two options; one that would involve
the aquatic facility being closed for the duration of construction and a second option that
attempted to keep one or more pools up and running for a portion of the construction project.
1153
2
On October 28, 2015, staff received compliant bids from the Pre-Qualified contractors as follows:
Option #1 – Complete closure of Aquatic facility for the construction period:
Firm Cost Estimated Construction Schedule
Heatherbrae Builders Company $5,490,000.00 56 weeks
Mierau Contractors Limited $4,811,062.00 52 weeks
KDS Construction $5,397,000.00 52 weeks
Option #2 – Phased approach:
Firm Cost Estimated Construction Schedule
Heatherbrae Builders Company $6,090,000.00 78 weeks
Mierau Contractors Limited $4,935,549.00 65 weeks
KDS Construction $5,647,000.00 70 weeks
b)Desired Outcome:
To ensure this facility will continue to serve the community in the future. Staff has identified a
variety of electrical, mechanical, filtration and chlorination equipment that should be replaced,
preferably prior to a failure of any of these systems that could result in an extended closure of
the pools. If the City wishes to continue to use this facility, it will be necessary to have a plan in
place to address the replacement of these major components that are approaching or have
exceeded their forecasted useful life expectancy, thereby ensuring the effective circulation of
clean, treated water in this public facility.
One of the initial drivers of this project was the desire to convert the chlorine gas system to liquid
chlorine and ultra violet system to reduce the risk level associated with the original system. In
the interim, facility safety is ensured through multiple chlorine gas sensors throughout the pool
deck and mechanical room areas. These sensors are capable of detecting very low levels of
chlorine gas and will activate an alarm in the event of a leak, thereby allowing for safety
protocols such as evacuation and quick response to contain and resolve leak issues, should they
occur. The installation of a liquid chlorine and ultra violet system will eliminate the risk that can
result from a chlorine gas leak.
Additionally, the aquatic facility is not adequately meeting the needs of an important segment of
our community that requires assistance in accessing the aquatic pools. In July of 2015 staff
applied for and received a $50,000 federal grant to enhance accessibility for children and youth
with varying abilities to the leisure (therapeutic) pool through the redesign of the entry/access
points into the pool. Consequently, the aquatic upgrades encompass a wide, gradual walkway
from the pool deck into the leisure pool and hot tub which will enable wheelchair access thereby
eliminating the need for portable lifting devices and transfer lifts. Accessibility features such as
this will ensure the aquatic facility is welcoming to all of our citizens.
c)Strategic Alignment:
This project aligns with the City’s strategic objective to manage existing municipal infrastructure
through the preparation of appropriate plans to ensure development, maintenance and renewal
of community assets, including the Maple Ridge Leisure Centre.
d)Citizen/Customer Implications:
The renovation project is quite significant and will have a substantial impact on public access to
aquatic services. While citizens and customers will retain access to the remainder of the
3
building, such as the gymnasium, weight room and racquet ball courts, the aquatic area will be
closed for an estimated 52 week period.
The recommended contractor has provided staff with a detailed plan of the hoarding
(construction wall painted on both sides) that would be required if the project was to be phased.
Unfortunately the proximity of the hoarding wall to the competition and teach pools would
eliminate aquatic staff’s ability to effectively guard the pool. The contractor has advised that it is
not possible to reduce the construction zone further to accommodate guarding. (Option 2
hoarding diagram is attached).
Staff also consulted with the Fraser Health Authority (FHA) regarding any rules or regulations that
may apply if this project was phased as outlined in Option 2. FHA has advised that they do not
support the phased approach as a minimum width of 1.2 m must be maintained around the
perimeter of the pool in order to maintain patron safety. Therefore a permit to operate would not
be provided during construction should Option 2 be considered.
Although all users of the Maple Ridge Leisure Centre pool will be affected by this closure, groups
such as the Haney Seahorses and the Haney Neptunes Swim Club will be highly impacted. The
following table outlines a tentative plan to accommodate these clubs during an extended
closure:
Swim Club Accommodation Plan
The Haney Neptunes offer competitive
swimming from May 1 to mid-August, plus a
maintenance program of 2 hours per week for
the remaining months
The Haney Neptunes summer program can be
accommodated at Hammond Pool from May 1,
2016.
The Haney Seahorses operate year round with
a break in July and August.
The Seahorses can be provided with the option
to move their practices to Walnut Grove
Aquatic Centre, which is about a 20 minute
drive from the Maple Ridge Leisure Centre.
Parks and Leisure Services Staff have connected with neighbouring pool facility operators and
determined that it is likely that our swim club programs could be accommodated at the Walnut Grove
pool in Langley. The staff at that location have advised that they would offer the Maple Ridge Swim
Clubs the same “not for profit rate” that they provide their own swim clubs. However, the Langley
rate is higher than the City of Maple Ridge Fees and Charges Bylaw.
If this location is utilized Council could consider providing the clubs with a grant that off-sets the
difference in the hourly rates provided by each community. If all time available was book by the two
clubs, it would cost approximately $100,000. In 2014 the Seahorses paid $22,208.43 and the
Neptunes $36,488.72 for pool time, a difference of approximately $42,000.
Categories Maple Ridge Rate Langley Rate
Non Profit - 25m lane - Prime Hourly Rate $10.82
Non Profit - 25m lane - Non-Prime Hourly Rate $5.41
Non Profit - 50m lane - Prime Hourly Rate $21.64
Non Profit - 50m lane - Non-Prime Hourly Rate $10.82
Competition Pool - 25m lane $5.96
Teach Pool – 25m lane $5.07
4
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
The closure of the pool for an extended period of time will result in a number of aquatic staff
being laid off for the duration of the project as there would be no shifts available for them. This
project will have an impact on a number of part time employees. It also has the potential to
affect other areas of Parks and Leisure Services as a result of seniority rights being implemented
for those employees affected by the pool closure.
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The Finance Department worked with Parks and Leisure Services staff to develop a financial
strategy to advance the project funding utilizing dedicated lifecycle funds. This funding strategy
is employed with the understanding that other non-urgent infrastructure projects in other
municipal buildings may need to be delayed to accommodate this priority project.
As of January 2016, the City will have accumulated approximately $2,000,000.00 in the City’s
Infrastructure budget to help fund this project. The balance of the funding required for this
project, including the additional contingency, will be borrowed internally from the capital works
reserve and repaid to the reserve by allocating a portion of the annual infrastructure budget over
the next five years. This funding strategy was discussed with Council in an earlier report on this
topic.
Budget Breakdown
Shape Architecture (design) $ 399,810 (399,810 is already spent)
Design contingency $ 79,962 ($35,000 is already spent)
Mierau Contractors (Construction) $ 4,811,062
Proposed Construction contingency $ 481,000
Sub Total $ 5,771,834
Previously proposed budget $ 5,500,000
Additional contingency funds requested $ 271,834
Revised Budget $ 5,771,834
g) Alternatives
Staff had previously indicated to Council that a full closure of the aquatics area was a
possibility; however the requirement of a one year closure is longer than was anticipated when
the project went to tender. Staff had expected that a phased approach would have enabled
some of the pool areas to remain open while other mechanical or construction work was being
performed.
As a result of this new closure period information, Council could consider an option of not
approving the award of this construction contract, or delaying the project until such time as a
second pool has been built in Maple Ridg e, which would eliminate or reduce the impact on our
citizens and swim clubs who use the facility, and the need for aquatic staff layoffs (at least at
this time).
However, there are some risks associated with a deferral of a project of this magnitude. For
instance, a failure of any of the major pool operating components could result in the closure of
the pool until replacements can be found. It is important to note that some of the equipment in
the Leisure Centre is original equipment and replacement parts are no longer available.
Sourcing or manufacturing replacement parts for unanticipated repairs may also have a real
impact on citizen access to the aquatics area. It is anticipated that the planning process
through to the opening of new pool facility could take as long as 5 years.
5
As a result of this risk, staff is hesitant to suggest the deferral of this project. The most
significant concern is the substantial loss of water that is occurring from two of the pool tanks.
Unfortunately it is not possible to definitively determine if this water loss is from the pool tanks
directly, from the supply and return pipes or from the surge tanks. Investigating this properly
would necessitate the removal of the pool deck to inspect the water lines supplying the pools.
The pool renovation project would have addressed all of our concerns in this regard.
CONCLUSIONS:
The detailed design phase has been completed, and the estimates for construction that were
received are within the anticipated estimated budget. Therefore, staff recommends that the contract
for the Maple Ridge Leisure Centre Renovations be awarded to Mierau Contractors Limited. An
additional funding allotment of $271,834.00 is also recommended as a contingency fund in the
event of any unforeseen issues that may arise once demolition of the old pool commences.
“Original signed by David Boag”
______________________________________________
Approved by: David Boag, Director
Parks & Facilities
“Original signed by Trevor Thompson”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Trevor Thompson
Manager, Financial Planning
“Original signed by Kelly Swift”
______________________________________________
Approved by: Kelly Swift
General Manager Community Development,
Parks and Recreation
“Original signed by Ted Swabey”
________________________________________________
Concurrence: Ted Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
:db
PHASE ONE