HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-06-14 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfPage 1
City of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
June 14, 2016
7:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
Note: This Agenda is also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws
or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or
resolution.
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS
300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
401 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of May 24, 2016
402 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of May 18,
25 and 31, 2016
500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
600 DELEGATIONS
601 CAMA Professional Development Award
- Jake Rudolph, CAMA Representative for BC and Yukon
MEETING DECORUM
Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are
decided at Council meetings which affect many people’s lives. Therefore, we ask that
you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary
and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council
Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person’s behavior will be
reprimanded. The meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge.
Council Meeting Agenda
June 14, 2016
Council Chamber
Page 2 of 6
800 CORRESPONDENCE
900 BYLAWS
Bylaws for Final Reading
901 Maple Ridge Parks and Recreation Facilities Amending Bylaw No. 7206-
2016
To regulate shelters to be consistent with recent court decisions and reflect
regulations put in place by other municipalities
Final reading
COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
1100 Minutes – June 6, 2016
Public Works and Development Services
1101 2016-091-RZ, 14155 Marc Road and PID 018-620-833, A-2 to R-1, R-2,
RST and RM-1
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7254-2016 to rezone from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to
R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), RST (Street
Townhouse Residential) and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) be
given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as
described on Schedules A, B, C, D, F and G of the Development Procedures
Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with a Subdivision application.
The following issues were presented at an earlier Committee of the Whole meeting with
the recommendations being brought to this meeting for City Council consideration and
final approval. The Committee of the Whole meeting is open to the public and is held in
the Council Chamber at 1:00 p.m. on the Monday the week prior to this meeting.
Council Meeting Agenda
June 14, 2016
Council Chamber
Page 3 of 6
1102 2016-109-RZ, 21137 River Road, RS-1 to RT-1
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7249-2016 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) to permit development
of a duplex be given first reading and that the applicant provide further
information as described on Schedule B of the Development Procedures
Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
1103 2015-279-RZ, 22833 122 Avenue, RS-1 to R-3
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7182-2015 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) to permit
subdivision into approximately 3 lots be given second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing.
1104 2015-008-SD, 11491 Kingston Street, Strata Title Conversion
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that a certificate of
approval be issued for application 2015-008-SD to permit conversion of an
existing industrial building to strata units and delegate authority to the
Manager of Inspection Services, Licences, Permits and Bylaws for strata
conversions.
1105 2015-379-DP, 23753 and 23771 130 Avenue, Wildfire Development
Permit
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal 2015-379-DP for 19 single family lots under
the R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone located in Silver Valley as the site
is located within the Wildfire Development Permit Area.
1106 Award of Contact ITT-EN16-31: 224 Street Watermain Replacement (122
Avenue to 124 Avenue)
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending Contract ITT-EN16-31, 224
Street Watermain Replacement (122 Avenue to 124 Avenue be awarded to
Sandpiper Contracting LLP; that a contract contingency be approved, that
the next Financial Plan amendment include an increase of the project
budget and that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the
contract.
Council Meeting Agenda
June 14, 2016
Council Chamber
Page 4 of 6
1107 The Ranch Pub & Grill Liquor License Amendment Application – Increase in
Seating Capacity
Staff report dated June 6, 2017 recommending that the application by The
Ranch Pub & Grill located at 21973 132 Avenue, Maple Ridge, BC for an
increase in seating capacity to include an outdoor seating area be
approved and that a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor
Control and Licensing Branch.
Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police)
1131 Renovations to Randy Herman Community Safety Building
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that renovations to the
Randy Herman Community Safety Building be approved; that renovation
costs be allocated from accumulated surplus and that a contingency be
allocated for unanticipated additional works.
1132 Turnout Gear
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending the purchase of a
secondary set of turnout gear (“working” uniform) for firefighters.
1133 Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Area
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that Downtown Maple
Ridge Business Improvement Bylaw No. 7251-2016 be given first, second
and third readings.
Community Development and Recreation Service
1151 Cooperative Housing Federation BC and Community Land Trust BC
Partnership
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that the City of Maple
Ridge enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Community
Land Trust Foundation of BC to answer the call for an Expression of Interest
to explore potential for the creation of affordable housing in the proposed
Memorial Peace Park Civic Facility.
Council Meeting Agenda
June 14, 2016
Council Chamber
Page 5 of 6
Administration
1171 2016 Home Show Report
Staff report dated June 6, providing a synopsis of the 2016 Home Show
Event.
Correspondence
1181 Ministry of Health – Harm Reduction Services
Letter from Terry Lake, Minister, Ministry of Health commenting on harm
reduction policies and programs, including safe needle disposal.
Other Committee Issues
1191
1200 STAFF REPORTS
1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL
From the June 6, 2016 Closed Council Meeting
• 04.03 Community Heritage Commission – 2016/2017 Term
Appointments
• 04.04 Maple Ridge Agricultural Advisory Committee – Term
Appointments 2016-2017
• 04.05 Maple Ridge Pitt Meadows Municipal Advisory Committee on
Accessibility Issues – 2016/2017 Term Appointments
• 04.07 North Slope Interceptor Alignment
• 04.08 City of Pitt Meadows – Board of Directors, Pitt Meadows Airport
Society
1400 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
Council Meeting Agenda
June 14, 2016
Council Chamber
Page 6 of 6
1500 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING
1600 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
1700 ADJOURNMENT
Checked by:________________ Date: ________________
QUESTION PERIOD
The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to
ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of
Public Hearing by-laws which have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium).
Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual
members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes.
Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the
information required to provide a complete and accurate response.
Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings,
delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to
Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and
information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to
have a voice in the future of this community.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk’s Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca.
Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca.
City of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 24, 2016
The Minutes of the City Council Meeting held on May 24, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chamber of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia
for the purpose of transacting regular City business.
PRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Mayor N. Read E.C. Swabey, Chief Administrative Officer
Councillor C. Bell F. Quinn, General Manager Public Works and Development
Councillor K. Duncan Services
Councillor B. Masse C. Carter, Director of Planning
Councillor G. Robson C. Marlo, Manager of Legislative Services
Councillor T. Shymkiw S. Schiller, Acting Confidential Secretary
Councillor C. Speirs Other staff as required
D. Boag, Director of Parks & Facilities
C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental
Services
C. Nolan, Manager of Accounting
D. Pollock, Municipal Engineer
S. Matthewson, Social Planning Analyst
Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
The meeting was live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEMS
Addition of Item 601 Jim Isherwood as a delegation
300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
The agenda was approved with the addition of Item 601.
401
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 2 of 17
400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
401 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of May 10, 2016
R/2016-294
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of May 10, 2016 be
adopted as circulated.
CARRIED
402 Minutes of the Public Hearing of May 17, 2016
R/2016-295
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Public Hearing of May 17, 2016 be adopted as
circulated.
CARRIED
403 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meeting of May 9 and
10, 2016
R/2016-296
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meeting of
May 9 and 10, 2016 be received.
CARRIED
500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL – Nil
600 DELEGATIONS
601 Application 2016-084-RZ, Jim Isherwood
Mr. Isherwood provided a presentation regarding Application 2016-084-RZ
relating to property located at 11929 267 Street. He outlined the positive
aspects of the proposed development.
700 UNFINISHED BUSINESS – Nil
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 3 of 17
800 CORRESPONDENCE – Nil
900 BYLAWS
Note: Items 901 to 902 are from the May 17, 2016 Public Hearing
Bylaw for Third and Final Reading
901 2016-059-RZ, 11952 224 Street, Unit 104
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7234-2016
Site specific text amendment to the C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) zone for
manufacturing in order to allow a craft brewery/lounge
Third and final reading
R/2016-297
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7234-2016 be given third reading and be adopted.
CARRIED
Councillor Masse – OPPOSED
Bylaw for Third Reading
902 2015-283-RZ, 14160 256 Street
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7177-2015
Site specific text amendment to the M-2 (General Industrial) zone to permit
the cleaning of low hazard (under 50 parts per million of PCB)
transformers; storage and minor processing of hydrocarbons
Third reading
R/2016-298
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7177-2015 be given third reading.
Mayor Read reviewed an email from Fire Chief Dane Spence regarding the
application.
CARRIED
Mayor Read, Councillor Duncan, Councillor Robson – OPPOSED
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 4 of 17
Bylaws for Final Reading
Note: Councillor Robson excused himself from discussion of Item 903 at 7:38
p.m. as he lives in the vicinity of the applicant.
903 2012-102-RZ, 25638 112 Avenue
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6965-2013
Staff report dated May 24, 2016 recommending final reading
To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) to permit subdivision into four RS-2 lots and one
remnant lot under the existing RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) zone
Final reading
R/2016-299
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 6965-2013 be adopted.
CARRIED
Councillor Duncan, Councillor Speirs – OPPOSED
Note: Councillor Robson returned to the meeting at 7:41 p.m.
904 2012-119-RZ, 24108 104 Avenue and 10336 240A Avenue
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6969-2013
Staff report dated May 24, 2016 recommending final reading
To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit future
development of 97 townhouse units
Final reading
R/2016--300
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 6969-2013 be adopted.
CARRIED
905 2013-080-RZ, 24086 104 Avenue
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7027-2013
Staff report dated May 24, 2016 recommending final reading
To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse
Residential) to permit a development of 18 townhouse units
Final reading
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 5 of 17
R/2016-301
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7027-2013 be adopted.
CARRIED
906 2014-028-RZ, 22562 121 Avenue
Staff report dated May 24, 2016 recommending final reading
906.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7154-2015
To amend the text to allow 5 rather than 6 storeys as the minimum height
for Medium & High-Rise Apartment developments in the Town Centre Area
Final reading
R/2016-302
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7164-2015 be adopted.
CARRIED
906.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7092-2014
To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-3 (High Density
Apartment Residential) to permit a future construction of a 5 storey, 73 unit
apartment building
Final reading
R/2016-303
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7092-2014 be adopted.
CARRIED
907 2014-054-SD, 23590 Dogwood Avenue
Dogwood Ridge Local Area Service Bylaw No. 7246-2016
For enhanced landscape maintenance costs
Final reading
R/2016-304
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7246-2016 be adopted.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 6 of 17
COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1100 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Minutes – May 16, 2016
R/2016-305
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting of May 16, 2016
be received.
CARRIED
Public Works and Development Services
1101 2016-082-AL, Application to Exclude Land from the Agricultural Land
Reserve, Lot 7, District Lot 409, Plan: NWP12328
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that Application 2016-
082-AL to exclude land from the Agricultural Land Reserve be forwarded to
the Agricultural Land Commission.
R/2016-306
It was moved and seconded
That application 2016-082-AL not be authorized to go forward to the
Agricultural Land Commission.
CARRIED
1102 2016-034-RZ, 12358 216 Street, RS-1 to RS-1b
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7247-2016 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to
permit future development into two lots be given first reading and that the
applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B and E of
the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the
information required for a Subdivision application.
R/2016-307
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7247-2016 be given first reading; and
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 7 of 17
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B
and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with
the information required for a Subdivision application.
CARRIED
R/2016-308
It was moved and seconded
That Item 1151 be dealt with immediately after Item 1103.
CARRIED
1103 2016-084-RZ, 11929 267 Street, RS-3 to RS-2
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7236-2016 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit a future
subdivision of four lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide
further information as described on Schedules B and G of the Development
Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the information required for
a Subdivision application
R/2016-309
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7236-2016 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules B
and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with
the information required for a Subdivision application.
DEFEATED
Mayor Read, Councillor Duncan, Councillor Robson,
Councillor Speirs - OPPOSED
Note: Item 1151 was dealt with following Item 1103
1151 Homelessness Initiatives Update
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that Maple Ridge Parks
and Recreation Facilities Amending Bylaw No. 7206-2016 to regulate
shelters to be consistent with recent court decisions and reflect regulations
put in place by other municipalities be given first, second and third
readings.
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 8 of 17
1151.01
R/2016-310
It was moved and seconded
That staff be directed to submit a Request for Qualifications to the
Homelessness Partnering Strategy to host a Regional Summit on
Homelessness.
DEFERRED
The Social Policy Analyst, provided additional information regarding Item
1151.
R/2016-311
It was moved and seconded
That the motion directing staff to submit a Request for Qualifications to the
Homelessness Partnering Strategy to host a Regional Summit on
Homelessness be deferred to the June 6, 2016 Council Workshop Meeting.
CARRIED
1151.02
The General Manager, Public Works & Development Services, provided
additional information on the development of Amending Bylaw No. 7206-
2016.
R/2016-312
It was moved and seconded
That Maple Ridge Parks and Recreation Facilities Amending Bylaw No.
7206-2016 be given first, second and third readings.
CARRIED
Councillor Bell, Councillor Masse, Councillor Shymkiw– OPPOSED
Note: Councillor Masse excused himself from discussion of Item 1151.03 at 9:35
p.m. as he has property adjacent to the temporary shelter. Councillor
Robson left at 9:36 p.m. and did not return to the meeting.
1151.03
R/2016-313
It was moved and seconded
That funding of up to $30,000 for remediation of the temporary shelter
facility following the June 30, 2016 closure per the terms of the lease be
approved.
DEFERRED
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 9 of 17
R/2016-314
It was moved and seconded
That the motion requesting funding for remediation of the temporary
shelter facility be deferred until a response from BC Housing as to
reimbursement of funds to remediate is received.
CARRIED
Note: Councillor Masse returned to the meeting at 9:45 p.m.
1151.04
R/2016-315
It was moved and seconded
That the Social Policy Advisory Committee be directed to prepare a draft
terms of reference and budget for a subcommittee to develop a platform
for community dialogue on homelessness that includes a speaker’s series
for Council’s consideration.
CARRIED
Note: Councillor Bell left the meeting at 9:47 p.m.
1104 2016-098-RZ, 21722 and 21734 Dewdney Trunk Road, RS-1 to RM-1
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7248-2016 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) to permit future development
into approximately 8 townhouse units be given first reading and that the
applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D ad E
of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
R/2016-316
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7248-2016 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules
C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999.
CARRIED
1105 2014-108-RZ, 12874 Mill Street, RS-3 and RS-2 to R-1
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7222-2016 to revise conservation
boundaries be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7138-2015 to
rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 10 of 17
Suburban Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) to permit a future
subdivision of approximately 5 lots be given second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing.
R/2016-317
It was moved and seconded
1) That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act,
opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided by
way of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7222-
2016 on the municipal website, and Council considers it unnecessary
to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of
holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw;
2) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7222-2016 be
considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and
Waste Management Plan;
3) That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No.
7222-2016 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste
Management Plan;
4) That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7222-
2016 be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public
Hearing;
5) That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7138-2015 be given
second reading, and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
6) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive
Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in
the Agreement;
ii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule “A”, Chapter
10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley, Figure 2 - Land Use Plan, Figure
3D - Horse Hamlet, and Figure 4 - Trails / Open Space.
iii) Road dedication on Mill Street as required;
iv) Park dedication as required;
v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the geotechnical report,
which addresses the suitability of the subject property for the
proposed development;
vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant to prohibit basements due
to the high water table;
vii) Removal of existing buildings;
viii) A Professional Engineer’s certification that adequate water
quantity for domestic and fire protection purposes can be
provided;
ix) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be
submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is
any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject
property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to
ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site.
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 11 of 17
x) That a voluntary Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) be
provided in keeping with the direction given by Council with
regard to amenities.
CARRIED
1106 2013-080-DVP, 2013-080-DP, 24086 104 Avenue
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal 2013-080-DVP to allow a reduction in front
and rear yard setbacks, an increase in the building height and a reduction
in the required number of visitor parking spaces and 2013-080-DP to allow
construction of 18 townhouse units in the Albion Area Plan.
R/2016-318
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2013-080-DVP
respecting property located at 24086 104 Avenue; and
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2013-080-DP
respecting property located at 24086 104 Avenue.
CARRIED
1107 2014-028-DVP, 22562 121 Avenue
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal 2014-028-DVP to allow a reduction in
setbacks along the front lot line and the exterior side lot line, to increase
the proportion of small car parking spaces and to reduce the width of the
driveway ramp into the underground parking structure.
Note: Councillor Bell returned to the meeting at 9:50 p.m.
R/2016-319
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2014-028-DVP
respecting property located at 22562 121 Avenue.
CARRIED
1108 2014-028-DP, 22562 121 Avenue
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal 2014-028-DP to allow for development of a
five (5) storey, 73-unit apartment building.
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 12 of 17
R/2016-320
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2014-028-DP
respecting property located at 22562 121 Avenue.
CARRIED
1109 2012-119-DP, 24108 104 Avenue and 10336 240A Street
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal 2012-119-DP to allow construction of 97
townhouse units on the subject properties, located at 24108 104 Avenue
and 10336 240A Street, in the Albion Area Plan.
R/2016-321
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2012-119-DP
respecting property located at 24108 104 Avenue and 10336 240A Street.
CARRIED
1110 Award of Contract ITT-EN16-19: 203 Street Road and Drainage
Improvements (Dewdney Trunk Road – Golden Ears Way)
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that Contract ITT-EN16-19,
203 Street Road and Drainage Improvements (Dewdney Trunk Road –
Golden Ears Way), be awarded to Eurovia British Columbia Inc., that a
construction contingency be approved, that the ISL Engineering and Land
Services Ltd. contract for Engineering Design Services for 203 Street Road
and Drainage Improvements (Dewdney Trunk Road – Golden Ears Way), be
amended, that the Contract Administration and Construction Inspection
Services Contract be awarded to McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. and
that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the Contracts.
R/2016-322
It was moved and seconded
That Contract ITT-EN16-19, 203 Street Road and Drainage Improvements
(Dewdney Trunk Road – Golden Ears Way), be awarded to Eurovia British
Columbia Inc. in the amount of $4,123,863.32 excluding taxes; and
That a construction contingency of $345,000.00 be approved to address
potential variations in field conditions; and
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 13 of 17
That the ISL Engineering and Land Services Ltd. contract for Engineering
Design Services for 203 Street Road and Drainage Improvements
(Dewdney Trunk Road – Golden Ears Way), be amended to increase the
budget by $99,400.00 excluding taxes, for environmental monitoring and
construction compliance services; and
That the Contract Administration and Construction Inspection Services
contract be awarded to McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. in the amount
of $150,600.00, excluding taxes; and further
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contracts.
CARRIED
1111 Award of Contract RFP-EN16-26: Engineering Services for 270A Street
Reservoir and Pump Station
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that Contract RFP-EN16-
26, Engineering Services for 270A Street Reservoir and Pump Station, be
awarded to Stantec Consulting Ltd., that a contingency for unanticipated
additional works be approved and that the Corporate Officer be authorized
to execute the Contract.
Note: Councillor Duncan left the meeting at 10:00 p.m.
R/2016-323
It was moved and seconded
That Contract RFP-EN16-26, Engineering Services for 270A Street
Reservoir and Pump Station, be awarded to Stantec Consulting Ltd. in the
amount of $248,815.00 excluding taxes; and
THAT a contingency of $25,000 for unanticipated additional works be
approved; and further
THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the Contract.
CARRIED
Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police)
1131 Disbursements for the month ended April 30, 2016
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that the disbursements for
the month ended April 30, 2016 be received for information.
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 14 of 17
R/2016-324
It was moved and seconded
That the disbursements as listed below for the month ended April 30, 2016
be received for information only.
General $ 8,370,384
Payroll $ 2,578,992
Purchase Card $ 71,075
$11,020,451
CARRIED
Community Development and Recreation Service
Note: Councillor Duncan returned to the meeting at 10:03 p.m.
1152 Assignment and Assumption Agreement – Joint Leisure Services
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign the Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated
June 1, 2016 between the City of Maple Ridge and the City of Pitt
Meadows.
R/2016-325
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign the Assignment and
Assumption Agreement dated June 1, 2016 between the City of Maple
Ridge and the City of Pitt Meadows.
CARRIED
1153 Library Renovations – Centralized Customer Service Desk
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 recommending that the Fraser Valley
Regional Library be authorized to withdraw up to $90,000 from the Capital
Reserve to fund the renovations and purchases required to create a
Customer Service Centre at the Maple Ridge Library.
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 15 of 17
R/2016-326
It was moved and seconded
That the Fraser Valley Regional Library be authorized to withdraw up to
$90,000 from the Capital Reserve to fund the renovations and purchases
required to create a Customer Service Centre at the Maple Ridge Library.
CARRIED
Administration
1171 2016 Council Expenses
Staff report dated May 16, 2016 providing on update on Council expenses
to the end of April 2016.
For information only
No motion required
Correspondence
1181 Pivot Legal Society – Municipal Bylaw Compliance
Letter dated May 5, 2016 from DJ Larkin, Barrister & Solicitor regarding
municipal bylaw compliance with the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms and requesting information from the City on the amendment of
relevant municipal bylaws.
It was recommended that Pivot Legal be advised of the decision taken
regarding the Parks Amending Bylaw.
Other Committee Issues
1200 STAFF REPORTS – Nil
1300 RELEASE OF ITEMS FROM CLOSED COUNCIL
From the May 16, 2016 Closed Council Meeting
Item 04.01 Purchase of 22008 124 Avenue for Future Park
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 16 of 17
1400 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
1500 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS
1600 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Brian Harris
Mr. Harris related his recent experiences providing security services for
local businesses. Mr. Harris requested that Mayor and Council investigate
his concerns regarding statements made by the Manager of Bylaws.
Matt Kelso
Mr. Kelso questioned the accuracy of a recent newspaper article. Mr.
Kelso raised a question regarding low barrier shelters. Statistics regarding
the temporary shelter were provided.
Gene Chartrand
Mr. Chartrand raised a question regarding Bylaws staff’s involvement with
security staff.
Kim Engle
Ms. Engle raised questions regarding public engagement around a purpose
built facility for the homeless, the MOU between Alouette Heights and BC
Housing and the review of social services by SPARCBC.
Glenna Kelso
Ms. Kelso asked for clarification regarding the amended Parks Bylaw. Ms.
Kelso shared information regarding the “Valley Sweep” program recently
initiated in Mission, Chilliwack and Abbotsford.
Kim Engle
Ms. Engle requested clarification regarding the status of the amended
Parks Bylaw.
Sydney Laurent
Ms. Laurent thanked the City for the work done in the community in regards
to homelessness. Ms. Laurent shared her experiences with homelessness
and urged compassion by all levels of government.
Council Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2016
Page 17 of 17
1700 ADJOURNMENT – 10:38 pm
_______________________________
N. Read, Mayor
Certified Correct
___________________________________
C. Marlo, Corporate Officer
402
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
Maple Ridge Parks and Recreation Facilities Regulation Amending Bylaw No. 7206-2016
A bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Parks and Recreation Facilities Regulation Bylaw No. 7085-2014
WHEREAS the Council of The City of Maple Ridge deems it expedient to amend Maple Ridge Parks
and Recreation Facilities Regulation Bylaw No. 7085-2014;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge Parks and Recreation Facilities Regulation
Amending Bylaw No. 7206 -2016”.
2.Maple Ridge Parks and Recreation Facilities Regulation Bylaw No. 7085-2014 is
amended by adding the following definition to Part 4:
Temporary Shelter means the use of structures, improvements or overhead
shelter, including a tent, lean-to, tarpaulin, plastic, cardboard or other form of
shelter.
3.Maple Ridge Parks and Recreation Facilities Regulation Bylaw No. 7085-2014 is
amended by adding a new Part 16 as follows:
Part 16 Temporary Shelter – Public and Park Land
16.1 No person shall place, secure, erect, use or maintain a temporary
shelter between 9:00 am and 7:00 pm on any public or park land
within the City.
16.2 Notwithstanding Section 16.1, no person shall place, secure, erect,
use or maintain a temporary shelter at any time in The Civic
Centre/Memorial Park, Nokai Park or Raymond Park or in, on or
within: playgrounds, spray parks or pools; horticultural display areas
or ornamental gardens; skateboard bowls, tennis courts or other
sports courts; sports fields, stadiums or dugouts; stages or bleachers;
washroom facilities, picnic shelters, or gazebos; areas of a Park that
have otherwise been issued a permit pursuant to this Bylaw;
recreation facilities; cemeteries; golf courses; or pathways, bridges,
docks or wharves within the City.
16.3 Temporary shelter found to be placed, secured, erected, used or
maintained between the hours of 9:00 am and 7:00 pm on any public
or park land within the City shall be unlawful and subject to
enforcement and removal, including any possessions, wastes and
other incidental materials.
901
4. Maple Ridge Parks and Recreation Facilities Regulation Bylaw No. 7085-2014 is
amended by renumbering the subsequent Parts accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME this 24th day of May, 2016.
READ A SECOND TIME this 24th day of May, 2016.
READ A THIRD TIME this 24th day of May, 2016.
ADOPTED this day of , 2016.
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
City of Maple Ridge
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
MINUTES
June 6, 2016
1:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
PRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Mayor N. Read E.C. Swabey, Chief Administrative Officer
Councillor C. Bell K. Swift, General Manager of Community Development,
Councillor K. Duncan Parks and Recreation Services
Councillor B. Masse P. Gill, General Manager Corporate and Financial Services
Councillor G. Robson F. Quinn, General Manager Public Works and Development
Councillor T. Shymkiw Services
C. Carter, Director of Planning
ABSENT D. Denton, Acting Corporate Officer
Councillor C. Speirs A. Gaunt, Confidential Secretary
Other Staff as Required
C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental
Services
D. Pollock, Municipal Engineer
L. Siracusa, Manager of Economic Development
D. Hall, Planner 2
1.DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS
2.PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council
Agenda:
1101 2016-091-RZ, 14155 Marc Road and PID 018-620-833, A-2 to R-1, R-2,
RST and RM-1
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7254-2016 to rezone from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to R-
1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), RST (Street
Townhouse Residential) and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) be given
first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described
on Schedules A, B, C, D, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No.
5879-1999, along with a Subdivision application.
1100
Committee of the Whole Minutes
June 6, 2016
Page 2 of 6
The Planner gave a Power Point presentation providing the following
information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Official Community Plan Context
• Neighbourhood Context
• Site Characteristics
• Development Proposal
• Environmental Context Map
• Proposed Draft Site Plan
• Recommendation in staff report
Ryan Lucy, Morningstar Homes
Mr. Lucy gave a Power Point presentation providing information on
subdivisions in Maple Ridge previously developed by Morningstar, a map of
the Marc Road site and surrounding areas and an outline of work done to
date and the various assessments done on the parcel. He also addressed
Morningstar’s intent to dedicate an area of the Blaney Bog and the dedication
of water courses feeding into Anderson Creek. Mr. Lucy spoke to the
proposed density and possible contributions to DCC’s. He provided a
rendering of the proposed detached homes.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 14, 2016.
1102 2016-109-RZ, 21137 River Road, RS-1 to RT-1
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7249-2016 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) to permit development of
a duplex be given first reading and that the applicant provide further
information as described on Schedule B of the Development Procedures
Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 14, 2016.
Committee of the Whole Minutes
June 6, 2016
Page 3 of 6
1103 2015-279-RZ, 22833 122 Avenue, RS-1 to R-3
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7182-2015 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) to permit subdivision
into approximately 3 lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 14, 2016.
1104 2015-008-SD, 11491 Kingston Street, Strata Title Conversion
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that a certificate of approval
be issued for application 2015-008-SD to permit conversion of an existing
industrial building to strata units and delegate authority to the Manager of
Inspection Services, Licences, Permits and Bylaws for strata conversions.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 14, 2016.
1105 2015-379-DP, 23753 and 23771 130 Avenue, Wildfire Development Permit
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that the Corporate Officer be
authorized to sign and seal 2015-379-DP for 19 single family lots under the
R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone located in Silver Valley as the site is
located within the Wildfire Development Permit Area.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 14, 2016.
1106 Award of Contact ITT-EN16-31: 224 Street Watermain Replacement (122
Avenue to 124 Avenue)
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending Contract ITT-EN16-31, 224
Street Watermain Replacement (122 Avenue to 124 Avenue be awarded to
Sandpiper Contracting LLP; that a contract contingency be approved, that the
next Financial Plan amendment include an increase of the project budget and
that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 14, 2016.
Committee of the Whole Minutes
June 6, 2016
Page 4 of 6
1107 The Ranch Pub & Grill Liquor License Amendment Application – Increase in
Seating Capacity
Staff report dated June 6, 2017 recommending that the application by The
Ranch Pub & Grill located at 21973 132 Avenue, Maple Ridge, BC for an
increase in seating capacity to include an outdoor seating area be approved
and that a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor Control and
Licensing Branch.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 14, 2016.
3. FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERVICES (including Fire and Police)
1131 Renovations to Randy Herman Community Safety Building
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that renovations to the Randy
Herman Community Safety Building be approved; that renovation costs be
allocated from accumulated surplus and that a contingency be allocated for
unanticipated additional works.
The General Manager of Corporate and Financial Services reviewed the staff
report.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 14, 2016.
1132 Turnout Gear
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending the purchase of a secondary
set of turnout gear (“working” uniform) for firefighters.
The Assistant Fire Chief reviewed the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 14, 2016.
Committee of the Whole Minutes
June 6, 2016
Page 5 of 6
1133 Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Area
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that Downtown Maple Ridge
Business Improvement Bylaw No. 7251-2016 be given first, second and third
readings.
The Manager of Economic Development reviewed the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 14, 2016.
4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERVICES
1151 Cooperative Housing Federation BC and Community Land Trust BC
Partnership
Staff report dated June 6, 2016 recommending that the City of Maple Ridge
enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Community Land Trust
Foundation of BC to answer the call for an Expression of Interest to explore
potential for the creation of affordable housing in the proposed Memorial
Peace Park Civic Facility.
The General Manager of Community Development, Parks and Recreation
Services reviewed the staff report and outlined reasons behind the expression
of interest.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 14, 2016.
Councillor Robson - OPPOSED
5. ADMINISTRATION
1171 2016 Home Show Report
Staff report dated June 6, providing a synopsis of the 2016 Home Show
Event.
Committee of the Whole Minutes
June 6, 2016
Page 6 of 6
The Manager of Economic Development reviewed the staff report. He
congratulated the Home Show organizers for a fine job done, thanked Council
for their support of the initiative and recognized Vickie Fulton for her
contribution.
RECOMMENDATION
That the staff report be forwarded to the Council Meeting of June 14, 2016.
6. CORRESPONDENCE – Nil
7. OTHER ISSUES – Nil
8. ADJOURNMENT – 1:53 p.m.
9. COMMUNITY FORUM
John MacKenzie
Mr. MacKenzie spoke to the issue of co-op housing. He asked that Council pursue
the Federal Government to make a long term commitment for funding for cooperative
housing.
___________________________________
G. Robson, Chair
Presiding Member of the Committee
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: June 6, 2016
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2016-091-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7254-2016
14155 Marc Road and PID 018-620-833
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject properties from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to R-
1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), RST (Street Townhouse Residential), and RM-
1 (Townhouse Residential District). Proposed yields include includes 61 R-1 (Residential District), 59
R-2 (Urban Residential District), 19 RST (Street Townhouse Residential) lots, and an unspecified
number of Townhouse units on two sites totally approximately 0.88 hectares (2.2 acres - based on
area, estimated to be about 40 units). An Official Community Plan amendment is required to adjust
the conservation boundaries. The application seeks greater density on this site than previously
considered by an earlier application (RZ/008/09 - expired). To proceed further, additional
information is required as outlined below. Pursuant to Council Resolution, this application is subject
to Policy 6.31, the Community Amenity Contribution Program.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the
development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether
consultation is required with specifically:
i.The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the
case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
ii.The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iii.The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iv.First Nations;
v.Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards; and
vi.The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this
matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s
website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and;
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7254-2016 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B, C, D, F and G of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 – 1999, along with a Subdivision application.
1101
- 2 -
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Morningstar Homes Ltd. Ryan Lucy
Owner: Falcon Crest Estates Ltd
Legal Description: Lot: 2, Section: 32, Township: 12, Plan: LMP14126, Lot: 3,
Section: 32, Township: 12, Plan: LMP14126
OCP:
Existing: ECO (Eco Clusters), Conservation, Rural Residential
Proposed: Eco Clusters, Conservation
Zoning:
Existing: A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
Proposed: R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), RST
(Street Townhouse Residential), RM-1 Townhouse Residential
District
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Vacant
Zone: A-2 (Upland Agricultural)
Designation Rural Residential & Agricultural
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-1 (Residential District)
Designation: Eco Clusters
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Eco Clusters and Conservation
West: Use: Blaney Bog
Zone: A-5 (Agriculture Only)
Designation: Park within the ALR and Rural Residential
Existing Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: Urban Residential
Site Area: 34.7 HA. (85.7acres)
Access: Marc Road
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
b)Site Characteristics:
The subject properties are characterized by forested slopes rising from west to east and by Anderson
Creek and a number of unnamed streams running through the site. Blaney Bog Regional Park and
flood plain are located along the western border of the subject site. All development must respect
the sensitivity of the bog and preserve the quality and quantity of the water flows to it. An existing
Eco Cluster subdivision and a dedicated park with a public trail network lies directly to the south of
the subject site.
- 3 -
c)Project Description and Background:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject properties from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to
R-1 (Residential District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), and RST (Street Townhouse Residential),
RM-1 (Townhouse Residential).
The applicant’s proposed lot yield includes 61 R-1 (Residential District), 59 R-2 (Urban Residential
District), and 19 RST (Street Townhouse Residential) lots, and an unspecified number of Townhouse
units on two sites totalling approximately 0.88 Hectares (2.2 acres). The proposal suggests a total
of 139 fee simple lots and a possible 40 townhouses for a total of about 180 future dwellings in a
multi-family and single family format. The Official Community Plan notes trails proposed to traverse
the subject properties along north-south orientation. Therefore, the expectation is that provisions for
trail development will be a requirement of this application.
A previous application for this site (RZ/008/09) was assessed and it was determined that a smaller
area was developable than currently proposed. The earlier application rendered a development of
137 units on a smaller foot print. A central feature of the Silver Valley Plan and the Eco-cluster
designation is for the land to inform development, thereby enabling the built form to be sensitive to
the natural features of the land base. The Plan’s goals are to preserve the character and features of
the lands as much as possible and to avoid wholesale regrading or blasting to enlarge development
envelopes. Slopes in excess of 25% should not be disturbed or built on. Based on these
considerations, there is concern that the current proposal does not adequately address the goals of
the Silver Valley Area Plan, particularly in relation to the Eco-cluster concept. More information will
need to be provided by the applicant to justify the extent of the proposal prior to second reading
occurring.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan and provide a draft land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will
need to be made once full application and studies have been received. A more detailed analysis and
a further report will be required prior to Second Reading that sets the actual land use boundaries
and lot yield. Such studies and assessments will impact the applicants proposed lot boundaries and
yields and Official Community Plan designations.
d)Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan - Silver Valley Area Plan:
The subject properties are split designated Eco-cluster and Conservation (the smaller northern parcel
is also designated 46% Rural Residential). The Eco-cluster designation refers to the developable
portions of the site. Some adjustments in the designations will need to be made once ground –
truthing occurs. An Official Community Plan amendment is required to adjust these designations,
particularly in relation to watercourse and natural features conservation. Section 5.4.6 of the Silver
Valley Area Plan speaks to Eco-Cluster densities, as follows:
a)Densities and housing types should be diversified within and between Eco-Clusters.
b)The densities of Eco-Clusters in the eastern sector should be lower than other Eco-Clusters
due to limited access and the requirements for accommodating equestrian activities, i.e.
pastures and stables.
c)An Eco-Cluster includes varying levels of density, ranging from 5 to 15 units per hectare, in
the form of single and/or multi-family units, dependent on proximity to a Hamlet centre,
slope constraints, view impacts, and existing development.
- 4 -
d)Residential areas should be developed in a manner to allow a gradual and natural increase
in density over time.
The Eco-Cluster designation is intended to provide development opportunities in sparsely developed
or rural areas, in a cluster form which supports sensitive implementation, minimal site regrading and
tree clearing, and integration of housing into a forest setting. Eco-clusters are located in areas
where topography is difficult, view impacts need to be minimised, and the existing rural character
should be retained.
The portions of the combined 34.7 hectare subject site that are designated Eco-Cluster amount to
20.3 hectares. For a site of this size, the number of units within the 5 – 15 units per hectare density
range amount to between 100 to 300 units. The proposed 180 (estimated) units of this
development are within this range. However, as this site is near the periphery of the Plan
boundaries, adjacent to a rural context, and to land that is within the Agricultural Land Reserve.
Council may wish to consider if the supportable densities should be lower for this site, and closer to
5 units per hectare.
Agricultural Policies: The Official Community Plan also contains policies aimed at protecting the
productivity of agricultural land. The subject property is adjacent to Blaney Bog Regional Park to its
West. As this park site is within the Agricultural Land Reserve, policy 6-12 b) will apply, as follows:
Maple Ridge will protect the productivity of its agricultural land by:…
b) Requiring agricultural impact assessments (AIAs) and Groundwater Impact Assessment of
non-farm development and infrastructure projects and identifying measures to off-set
impacts on agricultural capability…
Zoning Bylaw:
The subject site includes 14155 Marc Road and the 4.6 hectare parcel to its north. The current
application proposes to rezone the properties from A-2 (Upland Agricultural) to R-1 (Residential
District), R-2 (Urban Residential District), RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and RST (Street Townhouse
Residential).
Parcel sizes for these proposed zones are as follows:
R-1 (Residential District): 371 m2
R-2 (Urban Residential District): 315 m2
RM-1 (Townhouse Residential): 557 m2
RST (Street Townhouse Residential): 195 m2, 234 m2, or 273 m2, depending on whether the
property is an interior, exterior or a street corner lot.
Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance
Permit application.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the Official Community Plan, a Multi-Family Development Permit
application is required to ensure the current proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with
compatible housing styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with
neighbouring land uses. A separate DP is required for each of the two RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
sites and 1 for the RST (Street Townhouse Residential). These DP’s will be required to be completed
- 5 -
for final reading of the land use bylaw to be achieved. The City does not pre-zone land without the
development being proven out.
Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development
Permit application is required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top
of bank of all watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development
Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and
riparian areas.
Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit
application is required for all development and subdivision activity to ensure the preservation,
protection, restoration and enhancement for the natural environment and for development that is
protected from hazardous conditions for;
All areas designated Conservation on Schedule “B” or all areas within 50 metres of an
area designated Conservation on Schedule “B”, or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver
Valley Area Plan;
All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent;
All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Natural Features Schedule “C”
Within the Silver Valley Area Plan, the Conservation areas are shown on Figures 2, 3 and 4.
Pursuant to Section 8.12 of the OCP, a Wildfire Development Permit application is required for all
development and subdivision activity identified in wildfire risk areas. The purpose of the Wildfire
Development Permit is for the protection of life and property in designated areas that could be at risk
for wildland fire; and where this risk may be reasonably abated through implementation of
appropriate precautionary measures. The subject property is located within the Wildfire
Development Permit Area, identified on Map 1 in Section 8.12 of the Official Community Plan. Prior
to second reading a Registered Professional Forester’s Report will be required to determine wildfire
mitigation requirements.
Advisory Design Panel:
A Multi-Family Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel
prior to Second Reading for the two RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) sites, and for the RST (Street
Townhouse Residential) site.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is required for this application, as it is proposing more than 25
residential units to be developed. Prior to Second Reading the applicant is required to host a
Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy 6.20.
Community Amenity Contribution Program:
Policy 6.31, the Community Amenity Contribution Program (CAC Program) will be applied to this
development as a condition of rezoning. The following contribution rates will be considered:
a) $5100 per single family lot created; and
b) $4100 per townhouse dwelling unit.
- 6 -
It should be noted that at this time, the number of RM-1 units proposed for this development have
not yet been established. Prior to final approval, the estimated number of townhouse units must be
established in order for the amenity contribution charges to be assessed. In addition, due to their
fee simple tenure, the RST (Street Townhouse Residential) units will be assessed at $5100.00 per
unit.
e)Interdepartmental Implications:
Due to the proximity of the subject site to Blaney Bog, a referral will be sent to Metro Vancouver for
their input prior to second reading. Under the previous rezoning application (RZ/008/09)
correspondence was received from Metro Vancouver indicating that their park planning section
would require expert assurances that the hydrology of the regional park would not be impacted by
this adjacent development.
In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, comments and input will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a)Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
c)Fire Department;
d)Parks Department; and
e)School District;
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading.
The Parks and Leisure Services Department have identified that after subdivision is completed they
will be responsible for maintaining the trail network in the parkland.
f)Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879 – 1999 as amended:
1.An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A);
2.A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B or Schedule C);
3.Multi-Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D);
4.A Wildfire Development Permit Application (Schedule J);
5.Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F);
6.Natural Features Development Permit Application (Schedule G); and
7.Subdivision Application.
g)Alternatives:
A number of alternatives are available to Council in regards to this application. If Council has
concerns with the proposal they can deny or defer the application. In addition, Council may conclude
that the proposed densities exceed the intent of the Silver Valley Area Plan for this location. Should
- 7 -
this be the case, Council could also consider applying a density bonus formula similar to that used in
Albion ($3,100.00 per dwelling/unit) for any additional proposed density.
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that Council grant First Reading to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7254-
2016 subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to Second Reading. In
respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community
Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early
posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s website, together with an
invitation to the public to comment. It is, therefore recommended that Council not require any
additional consultation.
The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations
governing subdivision applications. Some concern exists over the density proposed and its location
relative to stream setbacks and existing steep slopes. The subdivision layout provided is strictly
preliminary and has not been approved by the City of Maple Ridge’s Approving Officer.
“Original signed by Diana Hall”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Diana Hall, M.A. (Planning), MCIP, RPP
Planner 2
“Original signed by Chuck Goddard” for
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Environmental Context Map
Appendix D – Draft Zoning Bylaw No. 7254-2016
Appendix E – Proposed DRAFT Site Plan (before ground truthing).
DATE: Mar 31, 2016
FILE: 2016-091-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT´
Scale: 1:5,000
14155 MARC ROAD &
P.I.D. 018-620-833
Legend
Stream
Ditch Centreline
Edge of Marsh
Indefinite Creek
River Centreline
Lake or Reservoir
Marsh
APPENDIX A
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Mar 31, 2016
FILE: 2016-091-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT´
Scale: 1:5,000
14155 MARC ROAD &
P.I.D. 018-620-833
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2011
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7254-2016
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7254-2016."
2.Those parcel (s) or tract (s) of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 2 Section 32 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan LMP14126
Lot 3 Section 32 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan LMP14126
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1679 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District), R-2
(Urban Residential District), RST (Street Townhouse Residential).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX D
141 AVE.MARC RD.PARKSIDE CRES.ANDERSONC
R
E
E
K
DRIVE MARC RD.´
SCALE 1:5,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From: To:
R-1 (Residential District)R-2 (Urban Residential District)
7254-20161679A-2 (Upland Agricultural)RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)RST (Street Townhouse Residential)
APPENDIX E
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: June 6, 2016
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2016-109-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: First Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7249-2016
21137 River Road
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 21137 River Road, from
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) to permit development
of a duplex. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined
below. As per Council Policy, duplex dwelling units where only one building is being constructed are
exempt from the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program.
The City has been undergoing a Zoning Bylaw review and through the process have identified
regulation changes to modernize the bylaw. Over the past year, Council noted an interest in
advancing certain changes to the bylaw, rather than waiting for the completion of the new Zoning
Bylaw. This proposed development application represents one such Zoning Bylaw change, as it
would provide for duplex form of development on lots 750 m² in area and respond to changing
development styles, affordability and market demand.
Bylaw No. 7249-2016 will reduce the minimum parcel size, minimum width and depth in the RT-1
(Two Family Urban Residential) zone. The proposed zoning regulations for the RT-1 (Two Family
Urban Residential) zone are: 750m² area, 20m width and 27m depth.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7249-2016 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule B of the Development
Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Mayur Mehta
Owner: Nasser Shekarchi
Legal Description: Lot 224 District Lot 249 Group 1 New Westminster District
Plan 44587
OCP:
Existing: Urban Residential
1102
- 2 -
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Two Family Residential (Duplex)
Site Area: 839 m² (9,031 ft²)
Access: River Road
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
b) Site Characteristics:
The subject property is 839m² (9,031 ft²) in size and is bound by single family residential lots. The
property is flat with a row of hedges fronting River Road. There is an existing house on the proper ty
that will require removal as part of rezoning approval.
c) Project Description:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential), to permit the development of a duplex. The
application also includes an amendment that will reduce the minimum parcel size and regulations
for the RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zone from 891 m² to 750 m².
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will
need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for
further development permits.
- 3 -
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The OCP designates the property Urban Residential, and development of the property is subject to
the Major Corridor infill policies of the OCP. These policies require that development be compatible
with the surrounding neighbourhood, with particular attention given to site design setbacks and lot
configuration with the existing pattern of development in the area. The proposed rezoning to RT-1
(Two Family Urban Residential) is in conformance with the Urban Residential designation and Major
Corridor infill policies.
It is noted that one of the underlying principles in the OCP is to encourage growth within the Urban
Area Boundary (UAB) and to accommodate growth through infill by promoting a mix of housing types
and tenures (Policy 3-1). The Residential Infill and Compatibility Criteria all support a change in the
unit type, and specifically cite that duplex development is both compatible and desirable in the City
(Policies 3-19 and 3-20).
Housing Action Plan
The Housing Action Plan was endorsed in 2014, and includes a number of goals and principles
aimed at providing safe, affordable and appropriate housing for the community. Specific goals in
support of encouraging duplex housing include: “To improve housing choice for all current and future
households”. Strategy #1 Housing Action Plan relates to housing mix and innovation and reads
“support the development of a mix of housing forms”. Based on the above, it is clear that reducing
minimum parcel size to the RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zone is in alignment with the goals,
principles and strategies in the Housing Action Plan, as it will encourage duplex housing in the City.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property, located at 21137 River Road, from
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) to permit a duplex. The
minimum lot size for the current RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone is 668m2 (7,191 ft²), and
the minimum lot size for the proposed RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zone is 891m2
(9,591 ft²). As part of the Zoning Bylaw review process, the minimum parcel dimensions and parcel
area for the RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zone are proposed to be reduced to maximize
opportunities for duplex infill in the city. Given that the subject property does not meet the current
width and area for the existing RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zone, but does meet the
proposed draft regulations, this report supports the application. A text amendment for the RT-1 (Two
Family Urban Residential) zone is included with the subject application, which has been brought
forward in advance of the complete draft Zoning Bylaw to facilitate this application. A text
amendment to the RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zone to allow a minimum lot size of 750m²
(8,073 ft²) has been prepared in support of this application.
Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance
Permit application.
It is noted that a rezoning application has received first reading for a duplex in the Town Centre,
application 2014-076-RZ. Under that application, a smaller minimum lot size is permitted for a
duplex in the Town Centre provided that the property is a corner lot or has access to a rear lane. For
consistency, both the Town Centre and general duplex provisions will be included in both amending
bylaws and the amendments will be finalized once the first application receives final reading.
- 4 -
Development Permits:
A Development Permit is not required for this rezoning, as a duplex is exempt from the Development
Permit Area Guidelines. However, a Section 219 Restrictive Covenant will be required to regulate the
form and character of the duplex. The RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) zone does not permit
secondary suites, and this restriction will be considered in the design of the building.
Advisory Design Panel:
A Form and Character Development Permit is not required because this is a duplex project;
therefore, this application does not need to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is not required for this application because it is in compliance
with the OCP and is less than 25 dwelling units.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a) Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
c) Fire Department;
d) Building Department;
e) School District; and
f) Canada Post.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. This evaluation will
take place between first and second reading.
f) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as re quired by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended:
1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B)
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
ALTERNATIVE:
Staff recommendation is in support of the Zoning Bylaw Amendment to the RT-1 (Two Family Urban
Residential) zone; however, if Council is not comfortable with the Zoning Bylaw Amendment for all
duplexes, each application could require a site specific amendment only.
- 5 -
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council
grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second
reading.
“Original signed by Adam Rieu”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adam Rieu
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No.7249-2016
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Apr 13, 2016
FILE: 2016-109-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENTFRASERVIEW ST.BERRY AVE.
116 AVE.212 ST.RIVER WYNDEDGEDALE
A
V
E
.211 ST.RIVER WYNDFRASERVIEW ST.2111011618
11518211610
1159521108 11596
11606
2107711609
11641
11512
11575
11527
11617
210902110521111115222110621137
2110721157210732114711532 21180211582107421112114902108221169 11585
2109711629
11515
11525
11584
11608
11628
1150821083 11625
11608
11585
11559
1160321102 11633
11618
21067115912
2119011616
115022110821067
11487
11605
11501
11522210822110021131
11567 2114411567
2108711491 2113811619
211112109221107211992116282
11617
1160921119
211161149421103115802109511624
11601
11610
21102SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:1,500
21137 RIVER ROAD
RIVER RD RIVERWYNDAPPENDIX A
City of Pitt
Meadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Apr 13, 2016
FILE: 2016-109-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENTFRASERVIEW ST.BERRY AVE.
116 AVE.212 ST.RIVER WYNDEDGEDALE
A
V
E
.211 ST.RIVER WYNDFRASERVIEW ST.2111011618
11518211610
1159521108 11596
11606
2107711609
11641
11512
11575
11527
11617
210902110521111115222110621137
2110721157210732114711532 21180211582107421112114902108221169 11585
2109711629
11515
11525
11584
11608
11628
1150821083 11625
11608
11585
11559
1160321102 11633
11618
21067115912
2119011616
115022110821067
11487
11605
11501
11522210822110021131
11567 2114411567
2108711491 2113811619
211112109221107211992116282
11617
1160921119
211161149421103115802109511624
11601
11610
21102SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:1,500
21137 RIVER ROAD
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2011
RIVER RD RIVERWYNDAPPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7249-2016
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7249-2016."
2. That PART 6, RESIDENTIAL ZONES, SECTION 601, ONE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL ZONES, (C) REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE, SHAPE AND SITING OF
BUILDING AND STRUCTURES, item 4) Buildings and Structures for Two Family
Residential Use in the RT-1 Zone is amended by deleting item (d) and replacing it
with the following:
(d) shall not be permitted on a lot less than 750 m².
(e) notwithstanding item (d) above, lots located within the Town Centre, as
identified on Schedule H, which are either a corner lot or provided with
lane access, shall not be permitted on a lot less than 557 m².
3.To Amend Schedule “D” MINIMUM LOT AREA AND DIMENSIONS by the modification
of the following line as follows:
RT-1 20 m 27m 750 m² See item 7 below
4.To Amend Schedule “D” MINIMUM LOT AREA AND DIMENSIONS after item 6:
7. For lots located within the Town Centre, as identified on Schedule H, which are
either a corner lot or provided with lane access, shall not be less than 557 m².
5. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 224 District Lot 249 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 44587
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1677 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RT-1 (Two Family Urban
Residential).
APPENDIX C
6. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of
, 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
FRASERVIEW ST.BERRY AVE.212 ST.116 AVE.
R IV E R R O A D
212 ST.RIVER WYNDE D G E D A L E A V E .211 ST.RIVER WYNDFRASERVIEW ST.2108811618
211101151821109
11468
11610
1159521108 11596
2107011606
11606
11628
2107711594
11609
11640
11615
11633
11641
11512
11575
11617
1 1 5 2 721058
1148421090115102110521111
11495115222110611690 2121111671
1155021137
2110721157210732114711515
11532
11642
114962118021158
1 1 4 8 1
115282107421112
114902108221169 11585
2109711629
11515
11584
11584
11525
11608
11628
2106811618
11551
11645
115082108311657
11625
210782120211537
1 1 5 6 3
11608
11585
2106011603
1155921102 11546
11633
11618
2106711591
21057211012119011616
1150221108
210592106711487
11605
11484
11501210821152221100211312114411567
11527
11587
11567
210871 1 4 9 1 2113811619
21092211112104021107211992110511601
1162821099 116171160921119
115012111611494
11685
115592110311580
211042109511624
11639 11632
11624
11601
11480
11610
2110211593
2109867
129
65 10
154
199
165
221
156
13
200
2
189
18
158
54
9
72
163
B Rem Pcl A73
204
12
210
34
7
13
205
1
58
192
81
195
43 Rem B178
2
1
164
152 1
206
57
82
3
9
35
8
201
191
203
133
11
160
223
2
10
224
25
42
222
193
2
135
A
1
220
190
159
C
B
11
79
1
155
5
196
140
55
62
131
346
141
6
2
37
12
161 1
162 5
153
A
REM.
130132
6
2
8
2
319
64
202
68
3
A
80
198
4
188197
41
157
1 66
26
194
4036
4
166
1
211
1
7
2
2
63 Rem 7
1156
6
134
7 10
151
P 41783
P 45596LMP 3838P 14425P 42541
P 21754P 43564P 14493P 11238 P 43564P 40804LMS 1692
P 28112 P 43564EP 17246P 42541P 43564P 39498 LMP 12576P 42541
P 27978
P 44587P 42541 P 43564P 21754
P 44587
P 44555LMP 16445P 35527 EPP 36400RP8369P 42541P 33537
P 28078LMP 434P 75991P 21754P 40804P 85133 BCP 16066P 19121P 82848P 24973
P 43584P 73040*PP057
P 9773P 40804P 14493P 41783
L M P 2 8 4 8 4
EP 28014
E P 5 4 5 1 9
EP 23001LMP 29183E
P
4
6
8
6
6
E P 5 4 5 1 9EPP 36637EP 27702RW 42542L M P 2 9 1 0 1EPP 3 6 4 3 1
R IV E R R O A D
´
SCALE 1:2,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential)
7249-20161677
- 1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: June 6, 2016
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2015-279-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Second Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7182-2015
22833 122 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property located at 22833 122 Avenue (see
Appendix A and B) from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential
District), to permit a future subdivision of approximately 3 lots. Council granted first reading to Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7182-2015 on November 24, 2015. Pursuant with Council resolution, this
application is exempt from the CAC Program, due to its location in the Town Centre.
This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP).
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1)That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7182-2015 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public
Hearing;
2)That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i)In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional
Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the
subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the
subject property is not a contaminated site.
DISCUSSION:
1)Background Context:
Applicant: Raymond Clarkson
Owner: Raymond Clarkson
Legal Description: Lot 353, Section 20, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 57241
OCP:
Existing: Single Family Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
1103
- 2 -
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Single Family Residential
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Single Family Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: RES (Urban Residential)
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), under rezoning
application 2011-130-RZ for R-3 (Special Amenity Residential
District)
Designation: Single Family Residential
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 850 m2 (9,149 sq.ft.)
Access: 122 Avenue, Greenwell Street
Servicing: Urban Standard
Companion Applications: 2015-279-SD, 2015-279-DP, 2015-279-DVP
2) Project Description:
The subject property is approximately 850 m2 (9149 sq. ft.) in size, is generally flat, and is bound by
single family residential properties. The property is within in the Town Centre Area Plan. The Town
Centre Area boundary is on Greenwell Street, on the east side of the lot. There are no streams or
slopes on the property. The existing house and detached garage on the property have been
demolished. The current application proposes to rezone the property from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District). The applicant is seeking to create three (3)
single family residential lots. Access is proposed to be from 122 Avenue for lots 1 and 2, and from
Greenwell Street for lot 3, to ensure sufficient intersection visual clearance for vehicles . The
neighbouring property to the west (12240 228 St.) is under Rezoning Application number 2011-130-
RZ to rezone to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) in order to subdivide into 4 lots and a lane,
running north-south. For more reference on current applications with the lane design in the subject
228 blocks, see Appendix A.
3) Planning Analysis:
i) Official Community Plan:
The development site is currently designated Single Family Residential within the Town Centre Area
Plan, which provides options for increasing density while retaining the single family character in
established neighbourhoods. The proposed R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zoning for the
development is consistent with the OCP, therefore no amendment will be required.
ii) Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 22833 122 Avenue from RS-1
(One Family Urban Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) to permit three (3) lots.
The minimum lot size for the current RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone is 668 m2, and the
- 3 -
minimum lot size for the proposed R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone is 213 m2. The
proposed lots range from 278 m2 to 282 m2 in area (2,990 sq. ft. to 3,035 sq. ft.).
iii) Proposed Variances:
A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves the
following relaxations (see Appendix D):
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985, Section 601C, D.2.a.ii lot dimensions; to
reduce the front width for lots without lane access from 10.5 to 10.05 meter
The requested variance to the R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zone will be the subject of a
future Council report.
iv) Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.8 of the OCP, an Intensive Residential Development Permit application is
required to ensure the current proposal provides emphasis on high standards in aesthetics and
quality of the built environment, while protecting important qualities of the natural environment. The
application has been received as 2015-279-DP, and will be subject of a future Council report. The
applicant proposes to build two storey homes of about 107m2 (1,160 sq. ft.) with a garage on each
new lot (See elevations in Appendix D)
4) Interdepartmental Implications:
i) Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has reviewed the development plans and has commented to the fact
that the existing buildings will have to be removed and a demolition permit will be required. The
existing 20mm water service will need a permanent disconnect. If the sanitary sewer connection is to
be reused for the new building, the developer will need to request temporary disconnection for that
service. The applicant’s engineer will need to review the condition of the existing service to verify if it
can be used.
Proposed lot number 3 must have their access from Greenwell Street, and the driveway must be at
least 7.5m north of 122 Avenue.
ii) License, Permits and Bylaws Department:
The Building Department has reviewed the plans and has the following comment:
1. Lot 3 must maintain a 7.5 metre visual clearance at the corner;
2. Any building projections (soffits, hutches, nooks and fireplaces) of less than 1.2 metres must
have non-combustible cladding.
5) School District No. 42 Comments:
Pursuant to Section 476 of the Local Government Act, consultation with School District No. 42 is
required at the time of preparing or amending the OCP. Therefore no referral was sent to School
District No. 42.
- 4 -
CONCLUSION:
The subject application is to permit a three lot single family subdivision in the Town Centre. As this
application is in compliance with the OCP, it is recommended that second reading be given to Zone
Amending Bylaw No.7182-2015, and that application 2015-279-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing.
“Original signed by Therese Melser”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Therese Melser
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7182-2015
Appendix D – Subdivision Plan
Appendix E – Building Elevation Plans
DATE: May 12, 2016 2015-79-RZ BY: DT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:1,500
22833 122 Avenue
2011-130-RZ
2013-117-RZ
APPENDIX A
DATE: Sep 8, 2015
2011 IMAGE
BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
City of Maple Ridge´
Scale: 1:1,500
22833 122 Avenue
Legend
Streams & Rivers (Topographic)
Feature Type
Ditch Centreline
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7182-2015
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7182-2015."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 353 Section 20 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 57241
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1648 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential
District).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 24th day of November, 2015.
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
12288
12194
12278
12301
228712288522914229222293112314
12169
12208
12258
12276
12255
2283322872228822292422921229232293312183 228182288022912229132293212201
12303
12240
12274
2280612287
12224
12238 228802293612211
12261
12293
12185
12258
12278
22883228912289722901229352294112191 2282412275
22836228742287322881229102292012304
12203
12253
12306
2281212195 22902229112291112229
12243
12273
12313
12182
12296
12265
12192
12298
2287522934228 ST.228 ST.ROGERS AVE.
122 AVE.GREENWELL ST.STOREY AVE.
122 AVE.
P 45792
A
Rem. N
3
P 44214352
291
113
102
65 66
215
128
115
217
118
96
336
P 58171
BCP 23946
79
11
75' of 1
Rem. 1
353
213 216
129
116
105
95
218
P 41773
RP 16335P 25555P 45078
114
103 104
P 41773
P 44292
106
5978
2 1P 82923
309
12 307
332
P 13667
P 51413
289
P 41774
57
P 41773
94
130
60
P 40082
P 813961 2
3
333
126
56
93
58
68
107
61
P 21837P 26692BCP 21032
4
292
214
92
P 42872 131
119
71
9
A
222
P 4836
1
P 44873
4 P 57241308
127
67
117
P 41774
219
108
97
P 143968
10
290
P 13667288
6
91
69 70
P 41774
EP 42655
RW 45948
EP 42655
EP 42655
GREENWELL ST.´
SCALE 1:1,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
7182-20151648
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX E
- 1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Read DATE: June 6, 2016
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2015-008-SD
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: C of W
SUBJECT: Strata Title Conversion (Non-Residential)
11491 Kingston Street
SUMMARY:
A Strata Title Conversion application has been received in which the applicant has requested that
Council, the “Approving Authority” under Section 242 (1) (a), give approval to convert an existing
industrial building to strata units. Staff supports the application.
Staff also recommends that Council delegate their authority in accordance with the Strata Property Act,
to allow non-residential strata conversions to be approved by the Manager of Inspection Services,
Licences Permits and Bylaws, thus streamlining this approval process.
RECOMMENDATION:
That a certificate of approval be issued for application 2015-008-SD to permit the conversion of
the Industrial building located at 11491 Kingston Street to Strata Title units under the
Condominium Act subject to the following conditions being addressed:
i.Clarifying the need to install a s tandpipe under the current BC Building Code;
ii.Revising that portion of the BC Building Code analysis (Appendix D) to current
construction requirements, including the requirement for a fire alarm system where a
building is sprinklered;
iii.Provide under a separate sealed letter, a comparison between the actual building as it
exists and what would be required under the current BC Building Code requirements .
iv.Verify the installation of a fire alarm system in this building . Should one not exist, a fire
alarm system will be installed as part of thi s strata conversion application;
v.Resolving unit numbering for the units in the building. The system currently has units 1
to 11 plus units 100, 106, 112, 200, 201, 300 & 400. All units numbering is to be 3
digit numbering with ground flo or units being 100 series and seco nd floor units being
200 series;
vi.Complete a seismic analysis of the building for the changes between the codes 1992 &
2012 BC Building Code requirements and determine the extent (percentage) of
compliance of the building in relation to current BC Building Code criteria; and
1104
- 2 -
vii. Registration of a Floodplain Restrictive C ovenant on title to all strata units reflecting the
current predicted flood construction level for the area based on the 2008 Fraser Basin
Council Report.
That Council delegate s its authority to the Manager of Inspection Services, Licences Permits and
Bylaws with respect to considering applications and signing plans for strata conversions of
previously occupied non -residential building in accordance with Section 242 (10) of the Strata
Property Act.
BACKGROUND:
History:
The subject property located at 11491 Kingston Street is designated Industrial in the Official
Community Plan and zoned M-3 (Business Park) Zone. The existing building is a 2,696 sq. m. multi-
tenant industrial structure constructed in 1999. The applicant proposes that the existing five (5) bays
become separate strata units in order to allocate property taxes and civic expenses between separate
units.
Strata Property Act: Requirements for Conversion:
The Strata Property Act states that Council shall not approve a conversion unless the buildi ng is
brought up to the current Building Code Standard and complies with all municipal bylaws. Further, it
states that Council shall consider:
1. The priority of rental accommodation over privately owned housing in the Municipality;
2. The proposal of the owner/developer for the relocation of persons occupying the building;
3. The life expectancy of the building;
4. The projected major increase in maintenance cost due to the condition of the building; and
5. Any other matters that, in its opinion, are relevant.
The following is an assessment of these requirements for this strata conversion proposal:
1) The priority of rental accommodation over privately owned housing in the Municipality;
Staff Comment: This is not applicable given the building is not for residential use.
2) The proposal of the owner/developer for the relocation of persons occupying the building;
Staff Comment: The applicant has provided a letter (Appendix E) that the
business/commercial tenants are agreeable to the conversion.
3) The life expectancy of the building;
Staff Comment: The applicant has provided an assessment and information (Appendix D)
that the building has a remaining lifespan of at least 75 years.
4) The projected major increase in maintenance cost due to the condition of the building; and
Staff Comment: The applicant has provided an assessment and information that major
maintenance matters are not foreseen.
- 3 -
5) Any other matters that, in its opinion, are relevant.
Staff Comment: Prepayment of property taxes will be required. Further to the analysis in the
next section, there are no additional matters identified by the Planning, Fire
or Building Departments that are relevant to be considered before the
conversion is granted.
Analysis:
Planning Department: A zoning analysis supplied by the applicant confirms the building complies with
the lot coverage, height and setback provisions. The site has 62 parking spaces , which is sufficient
under the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw for the combination of uses reported by the applicant.
Building and Fire Departments: The following must be completed to insure that the building is
structurally and mechanically sound and is in substantial compliance with the BC Building Code before
the Strata Conversion is approved:
1. Clarifying the need to install a standpipe under the current BC Building Code.
2. Revising that portion of the BC Building Code analysis (Appendix D) to current construction
requirements, including the requirement for a fire alarm system where a building is sprinklered.
3. Provide under a separate sealed letter, a comparison between the actual building as it exists
and what would be required under the current BC Building Code requirements.
4. Verify the installation of a fire alarm system in this building. Should one not exist, a fire alarm
system will be installed as part of this strata conversion application.
5. Resolving unit numbering for the units in the building. The system currently has units 1 to 11
plus units 100, 106, 112, 200, 201, 300 & 400. All units numbering is to be 3 digit numbering
with ground floor units being 100 series and second floor units being 200 series.
6. Have a seismic analysis of the building been carried out between the changes in the codes
1992 & 2012 BC Building Code and what percentage of compliance the building would be at in
relation to current BC Building Code criteria.
7. Registration of a Floodplain Restrictive Covenant on title to all strata units reflecting the current
predicted flood construction level for the area based on the 2008 Fraser Basin Cou ncil Report.
A set of updated plans identifying the changes to the building, revised unit numbers, etc. will be
required by the Fire Department.
AUTHORITY TO DELEGATE
The Strata Property Act establishes Council as the “approving authority” for signing strata plans for the
conversion of existing residential and non-residential buildings. The Act also gives Council the
discretion to delegate the signing authority to the Approving Officer or another person designated, as
follows:
242 (10) The approving authority may, by resolution, with respect to a specified type of previously
occupied building,
(a) delegate to an approving officer or other person designated in the resolution the exercise
of the powers and performance of the duties of the approving authorit y under this
section, and
(b) impose limits or conditions on the exercise of the powers and performance of the duties
delegated by the resolution.
- 4 -
Pursuant to Section 242 (10), it is recommended that Council delegate its approving authority to sign
strata plans for the conversion of existing non-residential buildings to the Manager of Inspection
Services, Licences Permits and Bylaws, to streamline the approval process by not requiring a Council
Report for future non-residential strata conversions.
Strata conversion of duplexes and multiple residential buildings, and specifically including strata
applications of rental properties, will continue to be forwarded to Council. This will allow Council to
assess each application on its own merits, based on an impact analysis prepared by staff about: the
rental accommodation and vacancy rates; the Housing Action Plan; relocation of residents occupying
the building; life expectancy of the building; and other relevant concerns or policies. There are very few
non-residential conversions, with review focusing mainly on code, safety and technical matters. Thus
delegation to the Manager of Inspection Services, Licences Permits and Bylaws is appropriate.
CONCLUSION:
Staff support the application and recommend that, once Council have given consideration to the
requirements outlined in the memorandum from the Manager of Inspection Services, and the applicant
has addressed the conditions and requirements noted therein, Council issue a certificate of approval.
“Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski”
_____________________________________
Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski, MCIP, RPP, MCAHP
Planner
“Original signed by Stephen Cote-Rolvink”
_________________________________
Stephen J. Côté-Rolvink, RBO, CRBO
Manager of Inspection Services
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
______________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carte r, M. Pl., MCIP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
________________________________________
Concurrence: E. C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
Appendix A: Subject Map
Appendix B: Strata plans
Appendix C: Memo from the Manager of Inspection Services
Appendix D: Applicants Code Analysis
Appendix E: Letters from Applicant respecting parking and concurrence of current occupants
DATE: Jan 23, 2015 FILE: 2015-008-SD BY: PC
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,000
11491 KINGSTON STREETLegend
!(Ponds
\\Wetlands
GPS Creek Centrelines
Streams & Rivers (Topographic)
Feature Type
Indefinite Creek Centreline
Ditch Centreline
River Centreline
Rivers & Lakes (Topographic)
Feature Type
Canal
Flooded Land
Lake/Reservoir
Marsh
River
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX E
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: June 6, 2016
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2015-379-DP
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Wildfire Development Permit
23753 and 23771 130 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Wildfire Development Permit application 2015-379-DP has been received in conjunction with a
proposed 19 single family lot subdivision under the R-2 (Urban Residential District) zone, located in
Silver Valley. A Wildfire Development Permit (WFDP) is required because the subject properties,
located at 23753 and 23771 130 Avenue (see Appendices A & B), are located within the Wildfire
Development Permit Area.
Since the adoption of the WFDP Guidelines in October 2014, the Planning Department, Licences,
Permits and Bylaws Department, and Fire Department have been monitoring the implementation of
the WFDP. There have been challenges in the application of the National Fire Protection
Association’s NFPA 1144 (Standard for Reducing Structure Ignition Hazards from Wildland Fire) and
NFPA 1141 (Standard for Fire Protection Infrastructure for Land Developments in Wildland, Rural
and Suburban Areas) in view of proposed new development applications.
The Home Owners FireSmart Manual (B.C. Forest Service Protection Program) would provide a
greater degree of flexibility while maintaining the intent of the WFDP Guidelines. A report will be
brought forward for Council’s consideration in July, outlining amendments to use the requirements of
the Home Owners FireSmart Manual to assess fire hazard and guide recommendations instead of
the NFPA standards. At the same time, the Fire Department will provide an update on the
Community Wildfire Protection Plan. In the meantime, in order to allow developers to continue
construction, in-stream WFDP applications are being reviewed in relation to the FireSmart Manual
Guidelines. This application has been reviewed against the FireSmart Manual requirements. Final
rezoning for the subject properties was received on September 29, 2015.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2015-379-DP respecting properties located
at 23753 and 23771 130 Avenue.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Joel Lycan
Owner: First Colonial Investors Ltd.
Legal Descriptions: Lots 1 and 2 Section 28 Township 12 New Westminster District
Plan
1105
- 2 -
OCP:
Existing: Medium Density Residential, Conservation and Neighbourhood
Park
Zoning:
Existing: R-2 (Urban Residential District), P-1 (Park and School)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential and Conservation
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Designation: Conservation
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Designation: Low Density Urban, Conservation and Park
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Designation: Medium High Density Residential, Low Density Urban and Open
Space
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Designation: Medium High Density Residential, Conservation, Neighbourhood
Park, Low Density Urban and Eco-Cluster
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential and Neighbourhood Park
Consolidated Site Area: 1.2 hectares (3.0 acres)
Access: 130 Avenue
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
Companion Applications: 2014-001-SD, 2014-001-DP
b) Project Description:
The subject properties were consolidated and rezoned from RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
to R-2 (Urban Residential District) and P-1 (Park and School), in order to create a 19 lot subdivision
and a neighbourhood park. The lots will be accessed via a new north-south local road terminating in
a cul-de-sac. The City of Maple Ridge has purchased the land north of the cul-de-sac for a future
neighbourhood park. A small portion of steeply sloping land has been dedicated as park for
conservation purposes in the south-west corner of the site.
c) Background
Since the adoption of the WFDP Guidelines in October 2014, the Planning Department, Licences,
Permits and Bylaws Department, and Fire Department have been monitoring the implementation of
the WFDP. One difficulty that has arisen are challenges in the application of the National Fire
- 3 -
Protection Association’s NFPA 1144 (Standard for Reducing Structure Ignition Hazards from
Wildland Fire) and NFPA 1141 (Standard for Fire Protection Infrastructure for Land Developments in
Wildland, Rural and Suburban Areas) in view of proposed new development applications.
The standards have been found to be quite stringent and there is recognition that the use of the
Home Owners FireSmart Manual (B.C. Forest Service Protection Program) would provide a greater
degree of flexibility while maintaining the intent of the Wildfire Development Permit Guidelines. A
report will be brought forward for Council’s consideration, at a future Council Meeting, outlining
amendments to use the requirements of the Home Owners FireSmart Manual to assess fire hazard
and guide recommendations instead of the NFPA standards. In the meantime, in order to allow
developers to continue construction, in-stream WFDP applications are being reviewed in relation to
the FireSmart Manual Guidelines.
d) Planning Analysis:
The Wildfire Development Permit Area Guidelines are intended for the protection of life and property
in designated areas that could be at risk for wildland fire and where this risk, in some cases, may be
reasonably abated through implementation of appropriate precautionary measures.
A Development Permit is required for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for
areas identified as a Wildfire Development Permit Area in the OCP. These Development Permit
Guidelines are to work in concert with all other regulations, guidelines and bylaws in effect.
This development respects the key guidelines as outlined in this section:
1. Locate development on individual sites so that when integrated with the use of mitigating
construction techniques the risk of wildfire impacts is reduced.
The FireSmart Manual (BC Edition) recommends a 10 metre (33 ft) setback between the forest edge
and all buildings. The same setback distance is also required between buildings. The R-2 (Urban
Residential District) zone has a rear yard setback requirement of 8 metres (26 ft) when access is
from the front street rather than a rear lane. The interior side yard setback requirement is 1.2 metres
(4 ft) and the exterior side yard setback is 2 metres (6.6 ft).
A permanent forest edge borders the development site to the north and in the south-west corner.
Lands with future development potential are located to the north -west, west, south, and east of the
development site. The Wildfire Development Permit Assessment prepared by Diamond Head
Consulting and dated April 22, 2016 reports that the development site has an overall moderate risk
from wildfire. The report further states that “[t]he primary risk is from the stands to the north, west,
and at the south east corner that support conifer tree species (adjacent t o lots 1-3 and 11-19). The
deciduous stand growing to the east of the site (bordering lots 4-10) currently poses a low risk as the
forest is dominated by deciduous species”.
Given the existing land uses, wildfire risks, and zoning siting requirements, Diamond Head
Consulting has provided a detailed list of building materials and construction requirements to
maximize the homes’ ability to withstand radiant heat and ember showers from a wildfire event.
Building faces adjacent to the current and permanent forest edge will require additional non-
combustible materials. All single family lots in this development will be subject to a Wildfire
Protection Restrictive Covenant to ensure that the prescribed building materials and construction
methods are used. Other site layout and servicing considerations include underground hydro
servicing, fire hydrants, and sufficient road width for two fire trucks to pass one another.
- 4 -
2. Mitigate wildfire impacts while respecting environmental conservation objectives and other
hazards in the area.
The subject development contains a steeply sloping area in the south -west and north-east corners of
the site that have been dedicated to the city for conservation purposes. Additionally, a treed city
owned neighbourhood park is adjacent to the site on the north side. These areas will be maintained
as naturalized spaces; however, Diamond Head Consulting has provided guidelines for strategic fuel
treatments that will mitigate the wildfire impact while respecting environmental conservation
objectives. This treatment includes pruning existing trees, removing woody accumulation and dead
or dying trees and will be undertaken by the developer. Conifer trees are recommended to be
spaced at 3 metres (10 ft), with conifers shorter than 10 metres (33 ft) removed. Diamond Head
Consulting advises that tree removal should minimize ground disturbance and should not occur
during the bird nesting season. All tree removal requires a Tree Cutting Permit.
Enhancement and replanting efforts required within the neighbourhood park land, in accordance
with the Natural Features Development Permit (2014-001-DP) will feature appropriate trees and
plants. This planting will also be spaced to minimize wildfire risk.
3. Ensure identified wildfire interface risks are recognized and addressed within each stage of
the land development process.
Diamond Head Consulting has identified wildfire interface risks and has provided a list of
recommendations including appropriate building materials, site layout, and FireSmart landscaping.
These recommendations will be registered as a Wildfire Protection Restrictive Covenant to ensure
compliance at the building permit stage, and to inform future homeowners regarding landscape
management within the zone around their homes.
4. Proactively manage potential fire behaviour, thereby increasing the probability of successful
fire suppression and containment and minimizing adverse impacts.
Previous key guidelines have outlined the building siting and materials, servicing, and parkland
treatment strategies to proactively manage potential fire behaviour. The final wildfire management
approach is to regulate landscaping maintenance surrounding the homes. Diamond Head
Consulting has provided recommendations for on-lot landscaping, and this information will form part
of the Wildfire Protection Restrictive Covenant. Recommendations include using FireSmart approved
plants and shrubs instead of conifers, keeping landscaping a minimum of 3 metres (10 ft) from all
buildings and structures, and using gravel and rock instead of bark mulch.
- 5 -
CONCLUSION:
As discussed in this report, this application has been considered against the requirements of the
Home Owners FireSmart Manual (B.C. Forest Service Protection Program) to assess fire hazard and
guide recommendations instead of the NFPA standards. The applicant has submitted a Wildfire Risk
Assessment report prepared by Diamond Head Consulting. This assessment outlines mitigation
measures for on-lot and conservation area landscape treatments, as well as building siting and
materials information. The Diamond Head Consulting report will form part of a Wildfire Protection
Restrictive Covenant that will be registered on each of the newly created lots to ensure the
recommendations are implemented and homeowners are aware. As the key guidelines for the
Wildfire Development Permit, it is recommended that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign
and seal 2015-379-DP respecting properties located at 23753 and 23771 130 Avenue.
“Original signed by Amelia Bowden”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Amelia Bowden
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Michael Van Dop”
____________________________________________
Approved by: Michael Van Dop
Assistant Chief, Planning & Prevention
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_____________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Subdivision Plan
DATE: Dec 7, 20152015-379-DP BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,500
23753-130 Ave2011 ImageLegend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River Centreline
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX A
DATE: Dec 7, 2015
2015-379-DP
BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,534
23753-130 Ave
2011 Image
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2011
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River Centreline
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: June 6, 2016
and Members of Council FILE NO: 11-5255-70-108
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Award of Contract ITT-EN-16-31: 224 Street Watermain Replacement
(122 Avenue to 124 Avenue)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The existing 250mm diameter asbestos cement watermain along 224 Street between 122 Avenue and
124 Avenue was installed in 1964 and has been identified for replacement as part of the City’s
Watermain Replacement Program and is included in the current Financial Plan. The 224 Street
watermain is a feeder main that is an important component of the City’s water network that feeds into
the Town Centre. Ongoing asset management review has confirmed that the City is experiencing an
increase in the annual number of breaks on the watermain over the last few years beyond the
threshold for replacement. 224 Street is also scheduled for repaving this summer and it is the City’s
practice to upgrade underground utilities in conjunction with paving, where appropriate.
The 224 Street Watermain Replacement Project from 122 Avenue to 124 Avenue generally consists of
the installation of approximately 400m of 250mm diameter ductile iron watermain, water service
connections as necessary, installation of new hydrants and pavement surface restoration.
The Invitation to Tender was issued on April 21, 2016 and closed on May 24, 2016 with eight (8) bids
received. The lowest compliant bid of $358,760.00 excluding taxes was submitted by Sandpiper
Contracting LLP. City staff have analyzed the tenders and recommend that the contract be awarded to
Sandpiper Contracting LLP. There is additional work by City crews to tie-in the new watermain to the
City water system.
Council approval to award the contract is required for the work to proceed.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Contract ITT-EN16-31, 224 Street Watermain Replacement (122 Avenue to 124 Avenue), be
awarded to Sandpiper Contracting LLP in the amount of $358,760.00 excluding taxes; and
THAT a contract contingency of $36,000 be approved to address potential variations in field
conditions; and
THAT the next Financial Plan Bylaw amendment include an increase of the project budget by $75,000
as detailed in the Council Report dated June 6, 2016 titled Award of Contract ITT-EN-16-31: 224 Street
Watermain Replacement (122 Avenue to 124 Avenue) from the Water Utility Fund; and further
THAT the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
1106
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
The existing 250mm diameter asbestos cement watermain along 224 Street between 122
Avenue and 124 Avenue was installed in 1964 and has been identified for replacement as part
of the City’s Watermain Replacement Program and is included in the current Financial Plan.
The 224 Street watermain is a feeder main that is an important component of the City’s water
network that feeds into the Town Centre. Ongoing asset management review has confirmed
that the City is experiencing an increase in the annual number of breaks on the watermain over
the last few years beyond the threshold for replacement. 224 Street is also scheduled for
repaving this summer and it is good practice to upgrade underground utilities in conjunction
with paving, where appropriate.
The 224 Street Watermain Replacement Project from 122 Avenue to 124 Avenue generally
consists of the installation of approximately 400m of 250mm diameter ductile iron watermain,
water service connections as necessary, installation of new hydrants and pavement surface
restoration.
Tender Evaluation
The Invitation to Tender was issued on April 21, 2016 and closed on May 24, 2016 with eight
(8) bids received, listed below from lowest to highest price.
Tender Price
(excluding taxes)
Sandpiper Contracting LLP $358,760.00
Marv’s Excavating Ltd. $384,000.00
Drake Excavating Ltd. $388,020.44
Triahn Enterprises Ltd. $405,215.00
Capilano Highway Services Company $421,700.00
J. Cote & Son Excavating Ltd. $428,000.00
Pedre Contractors Ltd. $433,000.00
TAG Construction Ltd. $436,294.00
The lowest compliant bid was $358,760.00 (excluding taxes) from Sandpiper Contracting LLP.
Staff have analyzed the tenders and recommend the contract be awarded to Sandpiper
Contracting LLP.
b) Desired Outcome:
To provide reliable fire protection and high quality drinking water to Maple Ridge residents.
c) Strategic Alignment:
One of the key strategies in the Corporate Strategic Plan is to manage existing infrastructure.
The 224 Street watermain is a feeder main that is an important component of the water
network that feeds into the Town Centre. Replacement and upgrading of the aging watermain
and fire hydrants on 224 Street will ensure reliability of service and provide capacity for future
years.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The estimated construction duration is approximately eight weeks starting in July 2016. It is
anticipated that traffic through the work zone will be reduced to single lane alternating. Some
of the fronting properties may be impacted during water service connection installations but
residents will be notified in advance of the work. Every effort will be made to minimize impact
to residents fronting the watermain installation on 224 Street. As well, the general public will
be informed of the construction progress through the City’s website and social media sources.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
The Operations Department has provided input during the design stage. Tie-ins to the live
water system will be completed by the Operations Department. A City staff inspector will
provide inspection services during construction.
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The projected expenditures excluding taxes are as follows:
Water Tie-ins by City Forces
Construction Contract Cost
Contract Contingency
Total Projected Project Cost
The project funding sources are as follows:
LTC NO. 014016 from Water Utility Fund (WUF)
Additional funding from WUF required
Total Funding Sources
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
10,000
358,760
36,000
404,760
330,000
75,000
405,000
The project expenditures include a contract contingency of $36,000 that will only be utilized if
required to address to address potential variations in field conditions.
CONCLUSIONS:
The tender price of $358,760 (excluding taxes) by Sandpiper Contracting LLP for the 224 Street
Watermain Replacement Project from 122 Avenue to 124 Avenue is the lowest compliant tender. It is
recommended that Council approve the award of the contract to Sandpiper Contracting LLP and a
contract contingency of $36,000 be approved. It is also recommended that funds be transferred from
the Water Utility Fund to LTC 014016.
“Original signed by Jeff Boehmer” “Original signed by Paul Gill” for
Submitted by: Jeff Boehmer, PEng. Financial Trevor Thompson, BBA, CPA, CGA
Manager of Design & Construction Concurrence: Manager of Financial Planning
“Original signed by David Pollock”
Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng.
Municipal Engineer
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
General Manager: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Office
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
DATE:
SCALE:
FILE/DWG No
ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT
DEWDNEY TRUNK RD.203 ST.216 ST.272 ST.LOUGH
E
E
D
H
W
Y
.
LOUGHEE
D
H
W
Y
.240 ST.224 ST.256 ST.100 AVE.232 ST.123 AVE.
128 AVE.LAITY ST.MAY 2016N.T.S.SitePlan8x11
SITE PLAN
224 STREET
122 AVENUE - 124 AVENUE
Page 1 of 3
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: June 6, 2016
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COW
SUBJECT: The Ranch Pub & Grill Liquor License Amendment Application – Increase in
Seating Capacity
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB) have received an application from The Ranch Pub &
Grill located at 21973 132 Avenue for an increase in their seating capacity (Appendix I). The purpose
of the increase in seating capacity is to provide their customers with an outdoor seating area where
they can watch equestrian events while taking advantage of all of the services of the pub. All other
conditions of their license will remain the same.
The Ranch Pub & Grill has an existing outdoor patio that can seat 100 patrons; however this patio
area is not included under its current Liquor Primary Licence. Including this area in their existing
liquor licence will allow patrons to sit outside and enjoy an alcoholic beverage while watching
equestrian events at the adjacent Maple Ridge Equestrian Centre.
One of the considerations utilized by the LCLB in reviewing an application for occupancy increases of
a liquor primary license is a resolution from the local government. A number of regulatory criteria
must be addressed in the Council resolution as well as comments pertaining to the views expressed
by area residents. Council may choose to support the application, not support the application or
indicate they do not wish to comment.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1.That the application by The Ranch Pub & Grill located at 21973 132 Avenue Maple Ridge,
BC for an increase in their seating capacity as an amendment to Liquor License No. 104720,
be approved based on the information contained in the Council report dated June 6, 2016.
2.That a copy of the resolution be forwarded to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch in
accordance with the legislative requirements.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
On May 9, 2016, The Ranch Pub & Grill through the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch
submitted a structural change application to their Liquor Primary Licence #104720.
The LCLB guidelines request a specific Council resolution commenting on the application in
terms of community impacts which may occur as a result of the proposed change to the
establishment operations as a result to the proposed change. Part of the process requires
1107
Page 2 of 3
Council to gather views of the residents who may be affected by the establishment of the
liquor primary license in their neighbourhood.
In following the public input requirement, 123 letters were sent to owners and occupants of
property within approximately 200 metres of the subject site with the vast majority of the
recipients being residents and the rest of the property owners showing as registered
companies. Of the 123 letters sent to surrounding property owners and occupants, there
were 3 responses in favour of the proposed amendment and 1 local area resident opposed.
In addition 14 letters were received from Maple Ridge residents not within the mailout area
but who supported the proposed amendment.
The City also posted a Public Notice in the local newspaper running in two separate editions;
May 13 and May 18, 2016.
The Maple Ridge RCMP Detachment was asked for their input on this matter and they have
confirmed they do not have any operational issues with this application.
The three closest liquor primary licensed premises to the subject property are:
The Blacksheep Pub – 12968 232 Street
Witchcraft Beer Market and Bistro – 22648 Dewdney Trunk Rd
The Wolf Bar – 22336 Lougheed Highway
b) Desired Outcome(s):
That Council supports the application from The Ranch Pub & Grill to increase their seating
capacity as requested.
c) Intergovernmental Issues:
Both local government and the provincial government have an interest in ensuring that liquor
regulations are followed and that licensed establishments listen to the needs of the
community.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The review of this application has taken into consideration the potential for concerns from
surrounding properties in terms of parking, traffic and noise generation as well as the
proximity of schools and similar establishments.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
The Licences Permits and Bylaws Department has coordinated in the review process and
solicited input from the public, other municipal departments as well as the RCMP.
f) Alternatives:
To not approve the application and provide conditions to the approval in the form or
recommendations to forward to the LCB.
Page 3 of 3
CONCLUSIONS:
That Council passes the necessary resolution supporting the application from The Ranch Pub & Grill
as submitted based upon the staff findings set out in this report.
“Original signed by R. MacNair”
___________________________________________
Prepared by: R. MacNair
Manager of Bylaws and Licencing
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
__________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
General Manager: Public Works and Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
RM/jd
Attachments:
Appendix I – License Primary Structural Change application
APPENDIX I
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: June 6, 2016
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Committee of the Whole
SUBJECT: RENOVATIONS TO RANDY HERMAN COMMUNITY SAFETY BUILDING
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Randy Herman Community Safety Building (“the building”) accommodates the City’s Bylaws and
Licenses Department and RCMP personnel. Having the Bylaws and Licenses Department on the
second floor is challenging from a customer service perspective as the space is hard to find.
Relocating the Bylaws and Licenses Department to the first floor of the building will enable easier
public access. In order to accommodate this change, RCMP staff will be relocated to the Bylaws
space on the 2nd floor and this will create efficiencies for the RCMP as they already occupy adjacent
space on the 2nd floor. Interior renovations will be required to effect these changes, the most
significant of which relate to the creation of a customer service area on the main floor for Bylaws and
Licenses.
The City archives, which houses our permanent records, is located at the Operations Centre. That
space is not accessible to the public, or staff, for research purposes and is not large enough to
continue to serve as archival space. The proposed relocation of RCMP personnel to the 2nd floor will
free up space on the first floor for the City’s archival records. Moving the archives will enable better
staff and public access to our historical records and provide additional space for the growing
collection until such time as a purpose-built facility is constructed. The Operations Centre is also in
need of additional space and vacating the space the archives is located in assists with the needs of
that division. Purchase and installation of movable shelving units will be required to maximize the
archival space.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That renovations to the Randy Herman Community Safety Building, as identified in the staff report
dated June 6, 2016, be approved and
That renovations costs of $170,000 be allocated from accumulated surplus and further
That a contingency of $20,000 be allocated from accumulated surplus for unanticipated additional
works.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The proposed renovations will meet several needs of the city. Bylaws and Licenses staff will be
located on the ground floor making them more accessible to the public. Archival records of the
1131
city will be housed in a better space and be more accessible to staff and the public. Operational
needs of the RCMP will be met through the relocation of their staff to the second floor. The
Operations Centre will reclaim the space occupied by the archives for their own needs.
b) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The renovations are estimated to cost about $170,000 including moving costs, structural, data
and electrical work, and a shelving system for archival records. The shelving system will cost
approximately $60,000 and can be moved to a new facility if and when built.
Funding of the costs of these renovations will come from accumulated surplus.
CONCLUSIONS:
Renovations to the Randy Herman Community Safety Building will meet several operational needs.
The Bylaws and Licences Department will be more accessible to the public, the City’s historic records
will be more accessible, efficiencies will be created for the RCMP and the Operations Centre will
reclaim space for their own needs.
“Original signed by Ceri Marlo”___________________
Prepared by: Ceri Marlo
Manager of Legislative Services and Emergency Program
“Original signed by Robin MacNair”________________
Prepared by: Robin MacNair
Manager of Bylaws and Licenses
“Original signed by Maureen Jones”______________
Prepared by: Maureen Jones
Senior Manager of Police Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”__________________
Approved by: Paul Gill, B.B.A, C.G.A, F.R.M
General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”_________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
:cm
1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: June 6, 2016
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W
SUBJECT: Turnout Gear.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Our firefighters currently have one set of turnout gear. When that gear is being washed, dried or
treated, firefighters use spare gear which is not properly fitted.
At the end of the day, turnout gear will last a certain period of time which is largely dependent on the
amount and type of usage. While a secondary set of gear has an upfront cost, the gear will not have
to be replaced as frequently. For this reason and for the safety of our firefighters, staff recommend
the purchase of a secondary set of turnout gear.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That the purchase of a secondary set of turnout gear be approved, noting that the additional cost of
$240,000 is to be funded from the Fire Department Capital Reserve.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Turn out gear refers to the “working” uniform of firefighters and is worn to all types of different
incidents. It consists of fire coats, pants, helmets and boots. Firefighters operate in a variety of
environments and the gear must be properly fitted.
When turnout gear is used in hazardous conditions, it must be treated, washed and dried before it
can be used again. In addition, turnout gear gets wet frequently not just because of the type of the
call, but the rainy weather in our region. Wet turnout gear becomes heavy and cumbersome to wear.
Further, this wet gear becomes a potential hazard when fighting fire because the moisture can turn
into steam and cause burns.
At the present time, we have one set of turnout gear for each career and paid-on-call firefighter. We
are getting more and more “back-to-back” calls for our career fighters which has resulted in career
firefighters not being able to use their assigned gear and instead having to use back up gear which is
not properly fitted.
At the end of the day, turnout gear has a certain life. By purchasing a secondary set of turnout gear,
turnout gear will not have to be replaced as frequently, though an initial outlay of funding is required.
1132
2
Coquitlam and Chilliwack already supply two sets to their career firefighters. Delta, Surrey and
Langley Township currently supply one set of turnout gear and are currently evaluating their
practices. Worksafe BC is also looking into the issue and may be issuing some directives in this
regard.
Paid-on-call firefighters do not have many back-to-back calls and we will continue to monitor the
need for them to have a secondary set of gear.
b) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
Our annual budget for turnout gear replacement is $70,000. We recommend that the initial outlay
of $240,000 be funded from the Fire Department Capital Reserve. Long term replacement costs will
remain the same as each piece of equipment will last longer.
c) Alternatives:
We could continue the present system of using spare gear understanding the associated risks.
CONCLUSIONS:
The purchase of a secondary set of turnout gear creates a safer work environment while keeping
long term replacement costs essentially the same.
“original signed by Howard Exner”
Prepared by: Howard R Exner, Deputy Fire Chief
“original signed by Dane Spence”
Approved by: Dane Spence, Fire Chief
“original signed by Paul Gill”
Approved by: Paul Gill, General Manager, Corporate and Financial Service
‘original signed by Ted Swabey”
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: June 6, 2016
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Committee of the Whole
SUBJECT: Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Area
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At its April 18, 2016 Council Workshop, Council authorized the continuation of the Downtown Maple
Ridge Business Improvement Area (‘the DMRBIA”). Council is required under the Community Charter
to receive the formal approval of the owners of property in the defined area before adopting the
bylaw that will re-establish the DMRBIA. This report outlines the process for adoption of the required
bylaw.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Bylaw No. 7251-2016 be given first, second and third readings.
DISCUSSION:
Council is proposing to undertake a local area service on its own initiative to grant money to the
Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association. The DMRBIA includes all lands shown
as shaded and within the boundary shown on Schedule A attached to Bylaw No. 7251-2016. The
money granted will be expended on the planning and implementation of a business promotion
scheme that includes the following activities:
•Marketing and promotions
•Safety and security improvements
•Beautification, including general clean up, graffiti removal, banners
•Festivals and other related promotional events
All of the grant paid will be recovered by means of a local service tax against all commercial
properties (BCAA Class Code 6). In 2016, the last year of the current DMRBIA, the levy collected was
$213,600. For 2017, the levy is proposed to increase by $50,000 to cover the cost of the increased
security and staff resources with increases in subsequent years calculated based on a 2.5% budget
increase. The annual levy against all commercial properties within the DMRBIA is proposed to be as
follows:
2017 - $263,600
2018 - $270,200
2019 - $276,900
2020 - $283,900
2021 - $290,900
1133
2
The program will end on December 31, 2021. Should Council wish to continue this business
improvement area after that date, this process must be repeated and a new bylaw adopted.
The levy for each commercial parcel will be determined on the basis of assessed value of land and
improvements.
Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Area Bylaw No. 7251-2016 is attached and it is
recommended that it be given three readings. Prior to final reading a notice in the form attached as
Schedule B will be published and mailed to all affected property owners. Thirty days after the second
publication of the required notification in the newspaper, if no valid petition against the improvement
area is received final reading will be considered. In addition to the legislated requirement to publish
notice in a newspaper once a week for two consecutive weeks and to post notice in City Hall, the
website and social media will be used to further publicize Council’s intention.
In order for a petition against a local area service to be certified as sufficient and valid it must be:
a) signed by the owners of at least 50% of the parcels that would be subject to the local
service tax, and
b) signed by the owners of parcels that in total represent at least 50% of the assessed value of
land and improvements that would be subject to the local service tax.
The Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association will be asking their membership if
they would be interested in participating in a meeting where the 5 Year Business Plan would be
presented. Should there be interest, then this meeting would occur during the thirty day notification
period. The Economic Development Office will support this meeting if it occurs.
The Economic Development Office will also work to ensure greater alignment between the DMRBIA
the goals of Council relating to downtown security, the façade improvement and other elements of
the Town Centre Animation Plan.
CONCLUSIONS:
The goals of the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association align with those of
Council in relation to creating a vibrant economy in the Town Centre supporting employment growth.
It is therefore recommended that Council grant first, second and third readings to the bylaw that will
re-establish the DMRBIA.
“Original signed by Ceri Marlo”____________
Prepared by: Ceri Marlo, C.M.C.
Manager of Legislative Services and Emergency Program
“Original signed by Lino Siracus”___________
Prepared by: Lino Siracus
Manager of Economic Development
“Original signed by Paul Gill”_____________
Approved by: Paul Gill, B.B.A, C.G.A, F.R.M
General Manager: Corporate & Financial Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”___________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
;cm
Attachments
Schedule A – Bylaw No. 7251-2016
Schedule B – Notice of Intent to Establish a Local Area Service
- 1 -
SCHEDULE A
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7251-2016
A bylaw to establish a business improvement area service to provide a grant to the Downtown
Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association for the planning and implementation of a
business promotion scheme for the Maple Ridge Downtown Business Improvement Area.
WHEREAS the Council of the City of Maple Ridge may grant money to an organization that has,
as one of its aims, functions, or purposes, the planning and implementation of a business
promotion scheme;
AND WHEREAS all of the grant paid must be recovered by means of a local service tax;
AND WHEREAS a notice of the intention of the Council of the City of Maple Ridge to establish a
Business Improvement Area Service for the purpose of funding a Business Promotion Scheme to
carry out certain works and services and to market and promote business within the Business
Improvement Area, has been duly given by publication of notice and service of it upon the
owners of the parcels liable to be specially charged and no petition against the works proposed
on Council's initiative, signed by the owners of at least 50% of the parcels that would be subject
to the Business Improvement Area Service tax, that in total represent at least 50% of the
assessed value of land and improvements that would be subject to the Business Improvement
Area Service Tax, has been presented within 30 days after the second publication of the notice;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to proceed with the grant;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1. TITLE
This Bylaw shall be cited for all purposes as “Maple Ridge Business Improvement Area
Establishment Bylaw No. 7251-2016”.
2. DEFINITIONS
In this Bylaw:
"Act" means the Community Charter, SBC 2003, Chapter 26;
"Business Improvement Area" means the area of the City of Maple Ridge
designated by Schedule "A" of this Bylaw;
"Business Promotion Scheme" means those specific activities and expenditures
set out in Section 5 of this Bylaw;
"Council" means the Council of the City of Maple Ridge; and
"City" means the City of Maple Ridge.
"DMRBIA" means the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association.
3. DESIGNATION OF AREA
Those lands within the area shown shaded on the map attached to and forming part of
this Bylaw as Schedule "A", are designated as a Business Improvement Area within the
meaning of Section 215 of the Act and shall be known as the Downtown Business
Improvement Area.
- 2 -
4. GRANT
a) Council is hereby empowered to grant to the DMRBIA money not exceeding the
following amounts:
2017 - $263,600
2018 - $270,200
2019 - $276,900
2020 - $283,900
2021 - $290,900
b) These monies shall be paid to the DMRBIA as follows:
January 1, 2017 - $131,600 July 1, 2017 - $131,600
January 1, 2018 - $135,100 July 1, 2018 - $135,100
January 1, 2019 - $138,450 July 1, 2019 - $138,450
January 1, 2020 - $141,850 July 1, 2020 - $141,850
January 1, 2021 - $144,450 July 1, 2021 - $144,450
5. EXPENDITURE
The DMRBIA will work with the City to ensure alignment with the priorities of the City
relating to security, façade improvements and other elements related to the Town Centre
Animation Plan and any other such plans that may be developed during the term of this
bylaw. The money granted under Section 4 of this Bylaw shall be expended only by the
DMRBIA, in accordance with the conditions and limitations set out in this Bylaw, and only
for a Business Promotion Scheme consisting of the following activities and expenditures:
a) marketing and promotions
b) safety and security improvements
c) beautification, including general clean up, graffiti removal, banners
e) festivals and other related promotional events.
6. RECOVERY OF FUNDS
(a) All of the money granted to the DMRBIA pursuant to this Bylaw shall be recovered
within the Business Improvement Area in the manner set out in this Section.
(b) For the purpose of recovering the monies granted to the DMRBIA under this Bylaw in
any year in which a grant is made to the DMRBIA, there shall be levied and imposed
in each year on all land and improvements within the Business Improvement Area
that fall within Class 6 of the Assessments - Classes and Percentage Levels
Regulations, B.C. Reg. 438/81, as that regulation stood on January 8, 1988, a rate
sufficient to raise the sums set out in Section 4 herein for that year. The levy shall be
based on the assessed value of land and improvements for general municipal
purposes.
7. CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Bylaw, no grant shall be made and no grant
funds shall be used or spent by the DMRBIA, in any year unless the DMRBIA:
a) submits an annual budget and work plan for approval by the City on or before
January 1st in each year beginning January 1st, 2018;
- 3 -
b) submits to the City a review engagement on a fiscal year basis, and such auditor
shall be a member, or a partnership whose partners are members, in good
standing of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accounts, or the Certified General
Accountants Association of British Columbia, or a person certified by the board
established under Section 181 of the Company Act, RSBC 1996, Chapter 62.
Such review engagement shall be prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and shall include a Balance Sheet and a
Statement of Revenue and Expenditure. A review engagement for the
immediately preceding fiscal year, shall be submitted to the City on or before
April 1st of each year beginning April 1st, 2017; and
c) is a Society incorporated and in good standing under the provisions of the Society
Act, RSBC 1996, Chapter 433.
8. INSURANCE
(a) The DMRBIA shall provide and maintain Commercial General Liability Insurance
acceptable to the City and subject to limits of not less than five million dollars
($5,000,000) inclusive per occurrence for bodily injury, death and damage to
property including loss of use thereof. The insurance shall cover any person
employed directly or indirectly by the DMRBIA as well as any contractor or
subcontractor hired by the DMRBIA.
(b) The City shall be added as an additional insured under the Comprehensive
General Liability Insurance policy, and the DMRBIA shall provide the City with a
copy of the policy prior to the City providing funding under Section 4 of this bylaw.
(c) The DMRBIA's Comprehensive General Liability Insurance policy shall contain a
cross liability clause and an endorsement requiring that the City be provided with
30 days prior written notice of any change in the policy or its cancellation.
9. EXPIRATION DATE
This bylaw shall cease to have effect on the 31st day of December, 2021.
READ a first time the day of , 2016.
READ a second time day of , 2016.
READ a third time the day of , 2016.
ADOPTED the day of , 2016.
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
- 4 -
1
SCHEDULE B
City of Maple Ridge
Notice of a Council Initiated Local Areas Services for the
Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association
The Council of the City of Maple Ridge gives notice that it is proposing to undertake a local area
service on its own initiative to grant money to the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement
Association that has, as one of its aims, the planning and implementation of a business promotion
scheme for the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Area. The business promotion
scheme includes:
• Marketing and promotions
• Safety and security improvements
• Beautification, including general clean up, graffiti removal, banners
• Festivals and other related promotional events
The Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Area includes all the lands shown as shaded and
within the boundary as shown on the map.
All of the grant paid to the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association will be
recovered by means of a local service tax.
The annual levy against all commercial properties within the Downtown Business Improvement Area
will be as follows:
2017 - $263,600
2018 - $270,200
2019 - $276,900
2020 - $283,900
2021 - $290,900
Based on the 2016 assessments, the annual cost to be charged to benefiting property owners in
2016 is estimated to be $.52468 per $1,000 of assessed value on both land and improvements in
assessment class 6 (business). In 2016 and thereafter, this rate may be adjusted either up or down
to raise the annual levy noted above. The program ends on December 31, 2021.
100% of the cost of the business improvement area service paid by the City of Maple Ridge to the
Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association, will be borne by the benefiting property
owners located within the Downtown Business Improvement Area shown on the map.
Council may proceed with establishing the local area service unless a sufficient and valid petition not
to proceed with the program is received by 4:00 p.m. July 25, 2016 (32 days after the second date
of publication of this notice in The News).
In order for a petition against a local area service to be certified as sufficient and valid it must be:
a) signed by the owners of at least 203 parcels (50% of the parcels that would be subject to
the local service tax), and
b) signed by the owners of parcels that in total represent at least $224,161,451 (50% of the
assessed value of land and improvements that would be subject to the local service tax).
2
If two or more persons are owners of a parcel,
a) they must be considered as one owner only,
b) they are not entitled to petition unless a majority of them concur, and
c) unless a petition is signed by a majority of them, their signatures must be disregarded in
determining whether the petition is sufficient.
Petitions against the local area service must be presented to the Corporate Officer at the Municipal
Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 6A9 on or before 4:00 p.m. Friday, July 22, 2016.
Copies of Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Area Establishment Bylaw No. 7251-2016
are available for public inspection at the Reception Desk at Municipal Hall during regular business
hours. This notice and the bylaw are also available for viewing at www.mapleridge.ca
Inquiries regarding the business promotion scheme contemplated by Downtown Maple Ridge
Business Improvement Area Establishment Bylaw No. 7251-2016 may be made to:
Lino Siracusa
Manager of Economic Development
City of Maple Ridge
604-467-7319, or
Ineke Boekhorst
Executive Director
Downtown maple Ridge Business Improvement Association
604-467-2420
Ceri Marlo
Corporate Officer
1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: June 6, 2016
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COW
SUBJECT: Cooperative Housing Federation BC and Community Land Trust BC Partnership
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
BC Housing has issued a call for Expressions of Interest (EOI) to partner with municipalities, non-
profit housing providers, community groups and the private sector to facilitate the creation of
affordable rental housing for low-to-moderate income households. The date for submission of the
EOI for the 2016 funding package is June 15, 2016. The Cooperative Housing Foundation of BC
(CHFBC) and its non-profit subsidiary the Community Land Trust Foundation of BC (CLT) are
interested in partnering with municipalities to create affordable housing in communities across the
province.
The city could enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the CLT to answer the EOI to
explore the potential for the creation of affordable housing in the proposed town centre
development. Entering into the MOU with the CLT for the 120 day period would not contractually
oblige the city to move forward even if the feasibility study demonstrated that objectives were met for
both parties.
The City of Maple Ridge’s Housing Action Plan clearly identifies a need for more affordable rental
options citing the availability of rental housing and the condition of existing rental stock as a priority.
Additionally, in the consultation report, both seniors and lone parent families were identified as a
population in need of affordable housing. This project would be appropriate for seniors and lone
parent families and the additional benefits of being close to services and transit would be significant.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City of Maple Ridge enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Community Land
Trust Foundation of BC to answer the call for an Expression of Interest due June 15, 2016 to explore
the potential for the creation of affordable housing in the proposed Memorial Peace Park Civic
Facility.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
BC Housing has issued a call for Expressions of Interest (EOI) to partner with municipalities, non-
profit housing providers, community groups and the private sector to facilitate the creation of
affordable rental housing for low-to-moderate income households. The date for submission of
the EOI for the 2016 funding package is June 15, 2016. BC Housing is providing significant
funding for the creation of affordable rental housing. The city could use this funding to achieve
affordable rental housing in the town centre development.
1151
2
The City of Maple Ridge’s Housing Action Plan clearly identifies a need for more affordable rental
options citing the availability of rental housing and the condition of existing rental stock as a
priority. In the consultation report, the following groups were identified as populations in need
of affordable housing: renters on low or fixed incomes, seniors, vulnerable populations, youth
with mental illness or problematic substance use, lone parent families and at risk women. This
project would be appropriate for seniors and lone parent families. The benefit for both
populations would be significant as the development is close to a variety of services and transit.
The mission of the CHFBC is to create affordable rental housing and to work with existing co-op
housing to maintain and improve their rental stock. To sustain this mission, they have created a
number of land trusts over the last three decades. These organizations share a common mission
that includes supporting co-operative and non-profit housing and the low and moderate income
households that depend on it. The Community Land Trust Foundation of BC was established in
2015 as part of the CHFBC. The CLT is a non-profit society with a mission to acquire, create and
preserve affordable housing for future generations.
In 2014, the Vancouver Community Land Trust Foundation was established as a non-profit to
acquire, preserve and create affordable housing into the future. This partnership is a ground-
breaking agreement between the co-op and non-profit housing sector, the City of Vancouver and
Vancity Credit Union. The consortium aims to develop 358 units of housing affordable to a broad
range of Vancouver residents, from the most vulnerable to those who simply need an affordable
place to call home. These housing projects will be in four different sites across the city.
The CHFBC and CLT are partnering with a number of municipalities across the province. The City
of Maple Ridge has been invited to enter into an MOU with the CLT. By entering into an MOU
with the CLT, the City of Maple Ridge would enter into an agreement to explore an opportunity to
develop property for the purpose of affordable housing. The City would agree to provide the CLT
with an exclusive option for the period of 120 days to determine the feasibility of developing the
property and reaching a form of agreement on land tenure. The study would be a full feasibility
analysis that would result in preliminary concept drawings. The CLT would be responsible for
costs associated with the feasibility study. The MOU does not constitute an agreement which is
legally binding.
The feasibility study will determine if the objectives of the City, the CLT and CHFBC are met. It
would also determine whether the proposed Memorial Peace Park Civic Facility would be a viable
location for affordable housing targeted to special populations like seniors or families with low-
moderate incomes. The CLT and the City of Maple Ridge in partnership would have the
opportunity to answer the call for the BC Housing Expression of Interest. BC Housing has stated
that they are interested in all EOI’s and are open to working with proponents to create a strong
final proposal.
b) Desired Outcome:
That the city enters into an MOU with the CLT to explore the opportunity to develop affordable
rental housing and increase the number of affordable housing options in the community.
c) Strategic Alignment:
The creation of affordable rental housing is in alignment with the Housing Action Plan.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Increasing access to affordable rental housing options especially for specialized populations
would benefit citizens and the community as a whole.
3
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
Community services, finance, planning and corporate services would need to work together to
provide adequate information and access to materials that parties acting for the CLT would
require to complete the feasibility study.
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
Although the cost of the feasibility study is the responsibility of the CLT, staff time will be required
to support the needs of the parties completing the feasibility study.
g) Policy Implications:
The OCP contains supportive policies under section 3.2 Affordable, Rental and Special Needs
Housing. Specifically, the following policies speak to the support of affordable rental housing:
3 - 28 Maple Ridge will encourage partnerships with government and non-government agencies
to support the creation of affordable, rental and special needs housing in the community.
3 - 32 Maple Ridge supports the provision of affordable, rental and special needs housing
throughout the City. Where appropriate, the provision of affordable, rental, and special needs
housing will be a component of area plans.
CONCLUSIONS:
The need for affordable rental housing is significant in most large urban areas across the nation.
The City of Maple Ridge’s Housing Action Plan identifies a need for affordable rental housing with
specific populations in greatest need. The CHFBC and CLT are providing innovative options to
address the need for affordable rental housing and to support those in greatest need of this type of
housing. By entering into an MOU with the CLT, the city could explore the creation of affordable
housing in the town centre with no risk or contractual obligation. The CLT in partnership with the city
could also apply for funding from BC Housing to achieve affordable rental housing units in the town
centre development.
“Original signed by Shawn Matthewson”
Prepared by: Shawn Matthewson, Social Planning Analyst
“Original signed by Wendy McCormick for Kelly Swift”
Approved by: Kelly Swift, General Manager
Community Development, Parks and Recreation Services
“Original signed by Ted Swabey”
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
:sm
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: June 6, 2016
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Committee of the Whole
SUBJECT: 2016 Home Show Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Ridge Meadows Home Show completed another successful event this year, with the organizers
estimating that approximately 25,000 people attended the three-day event from April 29 to May 1.
The Home Show added a number of new elements including the Food Truck festival, Outdoor
Lifestyle & Leisure Show, and BBQ School that helped make this one of the best-attended
community events in Maple Ridge.
Traditionally, the City of Maple Ridge has rented an indoor display space to display promotional
materials and to allow members of the public to engage Council members and City staff with any
questions or concerns they have. These questions and concerns were also recorded and then
directed to appropriate staff to follow up on after the show. There were a total of 35 recorded
questions and concerns which are summarized in Appendix A.
This year, the City expanded its presence at the Home Show by adding an outdoor display space to
showcase the City’s emergency first responders including RCMP, Fire, Search & Rescue,
Conservation Services and Emergency Services.
Council members and staff handed out approximately 550 copies of the new 2015 Citizen’s Report
and colouring sheets and crayons for children.
RECOMMENDATION(S): Receive for information
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The City has been an active participant in the Ridge Meadows Home Show for over twenty
years. This event has proven to be an excellent venue for facilitating community engagement,
providing a more relaxed and informal setting for residents to discuss their concerns and ask
questions of Council and staff. All of the questions and concerns from residents are recorded
and followed-up by staff after the show.
The indoor space was designed to encourage residents to engage Council members and staff
with any questions or concerns they had. The space featured a video montage of Maple
1171
Ridge, information from Parks and Leisure Services and Tourism, and a large street map of
Maple Ridge where residents were asked to “show us where you live” by sticking a pin into
the map. This map proved to be a highly effective tool for encouraging engagement with
Council and staff; approximately 700 residents stuck a pin in the map and then had an
opportunity to ask questions or discuss any concerns they had. These questions and
concerns were also recorded and then directed to appropriate staff to follow up on after the
show. There were a total of 35 recorded questions and concerns which are summarized in
Appendix A.
The outdoor display area was used by RCMP, Fire, Search & Rescue, Conservation Services
and Emergency Services. This very popular display area allowed the public to interact with
first responders while getting a first-hand look at fire trucks, RCMP motorcycles, conservation
officers’ trucks, search and rescue boats, and to experience the “quake cottage” earthquake
simulator. Also, the City’s Sustainability & Corporate Planning, in conjunction with Metro
Vancouver, campaigned to raise awareness of plug-in electric vehicles at more than 650
public and fleet charging stations across the province.
b) Desired Outcome(s): (whenever possible)
The Ridge Meadows Home Show provides a unique opportunity for Council and staff to
engage a wide spectrum of residents on their concerns, and is an excellent public education
opportunity for RCMP, Fire, Search & Rescue, Conservation Services and Emergency
Services.
c) Strategic Alignment (as appropriate):
The primary goal of participating in the Home Show is to provide another venue for
engagement with the community, and is consistent with the goals and intentions of the Open
Government Task Force and Council’s desire for increased transparency.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The Ridge Meadows Home Show is one of the most popular events in Maple Ridge and
provides an excellent opportunity for community outreach for the City. The event provides a
great venue for residents to voice their concerns, ask questions and discuss issues with
Council members and City Staff. It also provides an excellent venue for RCMP, Fire, Search &
Rescue, Conservation Services and Emergency Services to provide education and
information to the community.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
There is a broad level of participation in the Home Show including representation from
Council, Administration, Economic Development, Communications, Parks and Leisure
Services, Engineering, Operations, RCMP, Fire, Search & Rescue, Conservation Services and
Emergency Services.
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
Funding for participation in the Ridge Meadows Home Show is identified in the Economic
Development Department’s annual Business Plan.
g) Policy Implications:
None
h) Alternatives:
The current funding identified in the Economic Development Department’s Business Plan
could be redirected to support other community events or outreach programs as determined
by Council.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Ridge Meadows Home Show is one of the most popular community events in Maple Ridge. The
City has a long history of participating in this event, and many residents have come to expect to the
opportunity to meet Council and staff at this event. The Home Show provides an inviting, informal
setting for residents to learn more about the services the City offers, and for Council and staff to
learn about resident questions and concerns. This type of community engagement is consistent with
Council’s open government and transparency initiatives.
“Original signed by Bruce Livingstone”
Prepared by: Bruce Livingstone, Business Retention and Expansion Officer
“Original signed by Lino Siracusa”
Approved by: Lino Siracusa, Manager, Economic Development
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
Appendix A
Question or Concern Location in Question Dept to Follow up
Untidy/unsightly private property 7‐11 on Bypass and River Road Bylaws
Citizens Report ‐ Photo Contest n/a Communications
Maple Ridge Demographic Information n/a Economic Development
Concerns with roadway conditions and ditches 11806 Glenhurst Engineering
Concerns with speeding 240 & Kanaka Creek Bridge area Engineering
Increase traffic and speeding in area from new development
homes
112th & 246th (Grant Hill Estates) Engineering
Increase traffic in area from new development homes 240 & Kanaka Creek Bridge area Engineering
Need pedestrian crosswalk Jackson & 104 intersection Engineering
Need pedestrian crosswalk 105 & 242B intersection Engineering
Need pedestrian crosswalk 112th & 246th Engineering
Need pedestrian crosswalk Powell and Knott intersection Engineering
Need pedestrian crosswalk Brown & 222nd intersection Engineering
Need pedestrian crosswalk 104th & Jackson Engineering
Need pedestrian crosswalk Near 102nd Bike Park Engineering
Pedestrian crosswalk causing traffic problems Civic Centre crossing Engineering
Parking 11358 Cottonwood Engineering
Reduced speed limits on school zones causing traffic jams Dewdney Trunk Road & 248th Engineering
Road conditions 112th & 246th Engineering
Sightlines a concern with overgrown branches 256 & 136 Engineering
Sightlines a concern with the new Stop sign Jackson & 104 intersection Engineering
Traffic calming Jackson & 104 intersection Engineering
Need Traffic Signal Laity & 128 intersection Engineering
Erosion of Mckenny Creek banks 20804 Wickland Environmental
Fallen City trees on private property Private Property Environmental
Overgrown grass on City property 231 & Abernathy Environmental
Taxes doubled in Albion Albion Finance
Firefighters Park n/a Fire
Illegal dumbing of garbage 13435 236 Street Operations
Water pressure on private property Private Property Operations
Bike Trails n/a Parks & Facilities
Pitt Meadows Canoe Club looking for new club location in Maple
Ridge
n/a Parks & Facilities
Public washrooms unkept Whonnock Lake Parks & Facilities
Watercourse issues with new property development Private Property Planning
Rain Barrels n/a Ridge Meadows Recycling
Society
1181