HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-05-23 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfPage 1
City of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
May 23, 2017
7:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
Note: This Agenda is also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws
or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or
resolution.
100 CALL TO ORDER
101 Introduction of the new Officer in Charge, Ridge Meadows RCMP
Detachment
200 AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
401 Minutes of the Special Council Meeting of May 9, 2017 and the
Regular Council Meeting of May 9, 2017
500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
MEETING DECORUM
Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are
decided at Council meetings which affect many people’s lives. Therefore, we ask that
you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary
and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council
Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person’s behavior will be
reprimanded. The meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge.
Council Meeting Agenda
May 23, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 2 of 7
600 DELEGATIONS
601 Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Community Services Request for Financial
Contributions by the City of Maple Ridge to Affordable Housing
(Also refer to Item 901)
• Graham Plant, Development Manager, CPA Development
Consultants
• Glenn Campbell, Board Chair, Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows
Community Services
700 ITEMS ON CONSENT
701 Minutes
701.1 Development Agreements Committee Meetings of May 9, 2017
701.2 Minutes of Meetings of Committees and Commissions of Council
• Advisory Design Panel – April 11, 2017
• Agricultural Advisory Committee – March 23,2017
• Social Policy Advisory Committee – March 1, 2017
702 Reports
702.1 Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 providing information on the regulatory
framework and water quality monitoring data for 2016.
702.2 Disbursements for the month ended April 30, 2017
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 recommending that the disbursements for
the month ended April 30, 2017 be received for information.
702.3 2017 Council Expenses
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 providing an update on Council expenses
to the end of April 2017.
703 Correspondence
Council Meeting Agenda
May 23, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 3 of 7
704 Release of Items from Closed Council Status
From the May 9, 2017 Closed Council Meeting
04.03 Maple Ridge Community Heritage Commission – Member at Large
Appointment – Lindsay Foreman
04.04 Post Election Outreach – congratulatory letters to successful
candidates
800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Note: Items 801 and 802 were deferred at the May 9, 2017 Council Meeting
801 Motion by Councillor Speirs
Discussion of Riverview Lands
802 Maple Ridge Amateur Radio Club (MRARC) – Community Gaming Grant
Letter dated April 28, 2017 from John Mills, Chair, MRARC Lottery Grant
Committee requesting support for the radio club in its application to the
Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development, Community
Gaming Grants Branch for a grant to update its radio communications and
training equipment.
900 CORRESPONDENCE
901 Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Community Services – City of Maple Ridge
Contribution to Affordable Housing
Letter dated April 24, 2017 from Glenn Campbell, Chair, Board of Directors,
Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Community Services providing information on
the proposed project to create affordable housing at 11907 228 Street and
formally requesting a financial contribution from the City of Maple Ridge.
902 Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future Amendment to Section G
Performance Measures
Letter from Chris Plagnol, Corporate Officer, Metro Vancouver notifying
affected local governments and other agencies of opportunities to update
the performance monitoring program including an amendment to Section G
of Metro 2040 and requesting written comments on the proposed
amendment.
Council Meeting Agenda
May 23, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 4 of 7
1000 BYLAWS
Bylaws for Adoption
1001 2013-103-RZ, 12366 Laity Street
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7042-2013
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 recommending adoption
To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to R-1 (Residential
District) to permit subdivision of 4 lots in the first phase and 2 lots in a
second phase
Adoption
COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Public Works and Development Services
1101 2017-035-RZ, 11781 and 11775 Burnett Street, RS-1 to RM-2
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7325-2017 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit a
five storey, 64 rental unit apartment building be given first reading and that
the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D
and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
1102 2017-061-RZ, Various Properties in the 22200 and 22300 Blocks of
Dewdney Trunk Road, the 12000 Block of Garden Street, the 12000 Block
of 223 Street and 12011 224 Street, RS-1 and C-3 to CD-1-17
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7336-2017 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) and C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) to CD-1-17 (Comprehensive
Development) for redevelopment over several phases, allowing for a
comprehensively planned mixed-use commercial/office and residential
development in the Town Centre Area be given first reading, that Discharge
Land Use Contract Bylaw No. 7337-2017 be given first reading and that
the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C, D
and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with
information for a Subdivision application.
Council Meeting Agenda
May 23, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 5 of 7
1103 2015-297-RZ, Various Properties in the 23000 Block of Lougheed Highway
and the 11300 Block of 232 Street, RS-3 to R-2, RM-1 and C-1
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7331-2017 to allow a site specific
text amendment to the C-1 Zone and adjust zone boundaries to
accommodate road and parkland modifications be given first and second
reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing, that Housing Agreement Bylaw
No. 7332-2017 to secure adaptive dwelling units be given first reading and
that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7183-2015 to rezone from RS-
3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-2 (Urban Residential District), RM-1
(Townhouse Residential) and C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) to permit
future subdivision of approximately 89 R-2 lots, 262 townhouse units, a
one acre active park, conservation areas and a mixed-use commercial
residential building be given second reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing.
1104 2016-464-RZ, 20199 and 20185 McIvor Avenue, RS-1 to RS-1b
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7333-2017 to include property in the
Urban Area Boundary and to change land use designation from Agricultural
to Urban Residential be given first and second reading and be forwarded to
Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7308-2017
to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family
Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to permit approximately 9 RS-1b
zoned lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
1105 Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7327-2017
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Ticket
Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7327-2017 to amend the fine
amount for one section of the Maple Ridge Tree Protection and
Management Bylaw be given first, second and third reading.
1106 Community Heritage Commission Recommendation regarding Federal Bill
C-323
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 recommending that a letter indicating
support of Federal Bill C-323 be prepared for signature by the Mayor and
forwarded to the Federal Members of Parliament.
Council Meeting Agenda
May 23, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 6 of 7
Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police)
1131 Council Remuneration
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Council
Remuneration Bylaw No. 7330-2017 to establish Council remuneration be
given first, second and third reading.
1132 Train Whistle Cessation
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 recommending that preparatory whistle
cessation steps as required by Transport Canada for eight public railway
crossings located in Maple Ridge be undertaken and that a resolution be
prepared for consideration as per requirements by Transport Canada’s
Procedure for Train Whistling at Public Grade Crossings.
Parks, Recreation & Culture
1151 Strong Kids Task Group
Staff report dated May 23, 2017 recommending that the Strong Kids Team
be endorsed as a Task Group based on the attached draft Terms of
Reference, that the structure be reviewed after a period of three years and
that the Financial Plan be amended by $12,000 per year for the three year
term to fund the work of the task group.
Administration
1171
Other Committee Issues
1191
1200 STAFF REPORTS
1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
1400 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING
Council Meeting Agenda
May 23, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 7 of 7
1500 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
1600 ADJOURNMENT
Checked by:________________ Date: ________________
QUESTION PERIOD
The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to
ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of
Public Hearing bylaws which have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium).
Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual
members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes.
Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the
information required to provide a complete and accurate response.
Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings,
delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to
Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and
information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to
have a voice in the future of this community.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk’s Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca.
Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca.
400 Adoption and Receipt of Minutes
400
401 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting
401
City of Maple Ridge
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 9, 2017
The Minutes of the City Council Meeting held on May 9, 2017 at 5:05 p.m. in the
Blaney Room of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia for
the purpose of transacting regular City business.
0BPRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Councillor K. Duncan E.C. Swabey, Chief Administrative Officer
Councillor B. Masse K. Swift, General Manager of Parks, Recreation & Culture
Councillor G. Robson P. Gill, General Manager Corporate and Financial Services
Councillor T. Shymkiw F. Quinn, General Manager Public Works and Development
Councillor C. Speirs Services
L. Darcus, Manager of Legislative Services
ABSENT Other staff as required
Mayor N. Read R. MacNair, Manager of Licenses and Bylaws
Councillor C. Bell J. Hyland, Acting Officer In Charge, Ridge Meadows RCMP
K. O’Donnell, Staff Sergeant, Ridge Meadows RCMP
Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
Note: Councillor Shymkiw chaired the meeting as Acting Mayor
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
2.0 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
R/2017-167
It was moved and seconded
That the agenda for the May 9, 2017 Special Council Meeting be approved.
CARRIED
401
Special Council Meeting Minutes
May 9, 2017
Page 2 of 2
3.0 NOTICE OF CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING
R/2017-168
It was moved and seconded
That the meeting be closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1) and
90 (2) of the Community Charter as the subject matter being considered
relates to the following:
Section 90(1)(a) Personal information about an identifiable individual
who holds or is being considered for a position on a
Committee of Council.
Section 90(1)(f) Law enforcement, if the council considers that
disclosure might reasonably be expected to harm the
conduct of an investigation under or enforcement of
an enactment.
Section 90(1)(i) The receipt of advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for
that purpose.
Section 90(2)(b) The consideration of information received and held in
confidence relating to negotiations between the
municipality and a provincial government.
Any other matter that may be brought before the Council that meets the
requirements for a meeting closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1)
and 90 (2) of the Community Charter or Freedom of Information and
Protection of Privacy Act.
CARRIED
4.0 ADJOURNMENT – 5:06 p.m.
_______________________________
T. Shymkiw, Acting Mayor
Certified Correct
___________________________________
L. Darcus, Corporate Officer
City of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
May 9, 2017
The Minutes of the City Council Meeting held on May 9, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chamber of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia
for the purpose of transacting regular City business.
0BPRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Councillor K. Duncan E.C. Swabey, Chief Administrative Officer
Councillor B. Masse K. Swift, General Manager of Parks, Recreation & Culture
Councillor G. Robson P. Gill, General Manager Corporate and Financial Services
Councillor C. Speirs F. Quinn, General Manager Public Works and Development
Councillor T. Shymkiw Services
C. Carter, Director of Planning
L. Darcus, Manager of Legislative Services
ABSENT A. Gaunt, Confidential Secretary
Mayor N. Read Other staff as required
Councillor C. Bell C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental
Services
D. Hall, Planner 1
Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
Note: Councillor Shymkiw chaired the meeting as Acting Mayor
Note: Councillor Robson was not in attendance at the start of the meeting.
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
The agenda was amended with the withdrawal of Item 1104
300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
R/2017-169
It was moved and seconded
That the agenda for the May 9, 2017 Council Meeting be approved as
amended.
CARRIED
402
Council Meeting Minutes
May 9, 2017
Page 2 of 10
400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
401 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of April 25, 2017
R/2017-170
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of April 25, 2017 be
adopted as circulated.
CARRIED
402 Minutes of the Public Hearing of April 25, 2017
R/2017-171
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Public Hearing of April 25, 2017 be adopted as
circulated.
CARRIED
500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
Mr. Swaybe, the CAO, was presented with a Canadian Association of
Municipal Administrators’ Long Service Recognition Award.
600 DELEGATIONS – Nil
700 ITEMS ON CONSENT
701 Minutes
701.1 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee of April 19 and 28,
2017 and May 4, 2017
701.2 Minutes of Meetings of Committees and Commissions of Council
• Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Municipal Advisory Committee on
Accessibility Issues – February 16, 2017
701.3 Minutes of the Committee of the Whole of April 24, 2017
Council Meeting Minutes
May 9, 2017
Page 3 of 10
702 Reports
702.1 Disbursements for the month ended March 31, 2017
Staff report dated May 9, 2017 recommending that the disbursements for
the month ended March 31, 2017 be received for information.
703 Correspondence – Nil
704 Release of Items from Closed Council Status – Nil
R/2017-172
It was moved and seconded
That Items 701.1, 701.2, 701.3 and 702.1 on the “Items for Consent”
agenda be received into the record.
CARRIED
800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
801 Motion by Councillor Speirs
R/2017-173
It was moved and seconded
That a discussion of Riverview lands be added to the May 23, 2017 Council
Meeting agenda.
CARRIED
900 CORRESPONDENCE
901 Maple Ridge Amateur Radio Club (MRARC) – Community Gaming Grant
Letter dated April 28, 2017 from John Mills, Chair, MRARC Lottery Grant
Committee requesting support for the radio club in its application to the
Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development, Community
Gaming Grants Branch for a grant to update its radio communications and
training equipment.
Note: The MRARC supports the Maple Ridge Emergency Operations Centre by
volunteering their time and resources and would play an important role
during any substantial emergency.
Council Meeting Minutes
May 9, 2017
Page 4 of 10
R/2017-174
It was moved and seconded
That the application by the Maple Ridge Amateur Radio Club (“MRARC”) to
the Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development, Community
Gaming Grants Branch for a grant to update radio communications and
training equipment be supported.
R/2017-175
It was moved and seconded
That the letter from the Maple Ridge Amateur Radio Club be deferred to the
May 23, 2017 Council Meeting and that staff provide further information
on the proposed uses of grant monies by the MRARC.
CARRIED
Councillor Duncan - OPPOSED
1000 BYLAWS
Note: Item 1001 is from the Public Hearing of April 25, 2017
Bylaws for Third Reading
1001 2016-209-RZ, 20421 123 Avenue
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7264-2016
To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family
Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to permit a future 2 lot subdivision
Third reading
R/2017-176
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7264-2016 be given third reading.
CARRIED
Bylaws for Adoption
1002 Maple Ridge 2017 Tax Rates Bylaws
1002.1 Maple Ridge Road 13 Dyking District Tax Rates Bylaw No. 7324-2017
To allow for dyke maintenance and improvements and equipment repair
and maintenance
Adoption
Council Meeting Minutes
May 9, 2017
Page 5 of 10
R/2017-177
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7324-2017 be adopted.
CARRIED
1002.2 Albion Dyking District Tax Rates Bylaw No. 7323-2017
To allow for dyke maintenance and improvements and equipment repair
and maintenance
Adoption
R/2017-178
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7323-2017 be adopted.
CARRIED
1003 Maple Ridge 2017-2021 Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7317-2017
Staff report dated May 9, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge 2017-
2021 Financial Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7317-2017 to amend the 2017-
2021 Financial Plan Bylaw be adopted as amended.
Adoption
R/2017-179
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7317-2017 be adopted.
CARRIED
1004 Maple Ridge 2017 Property Tax Rates Bylaw No. 7318-2017
To establish property tax rates for Municipal and GVRD purposes for the
year 2017
Adoption
R/2017-180
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7318-2017 be adopted.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
May 9, 2017
Page 6 of 10
1005 Maple Ridge Recycling Charges Amending Bylaw No. 7319-2017
To set recycling charges for 2017
Adoption
R/2017-181
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7319-2017 be adopted.
CARRIED
1100 REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Public Works and Development Services
1101 2017-074-RZ, 20383 Ospring Street, RS-1 to R-1
Staff report dated May 9, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7315-2017 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) to create a 2 lot subdivision be
given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as
described on Schedules A, B, E and G of the Development Procedures
Bylaw No. 5879-1999 along with information required for a Subdivision
application.
R/2017-182
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7315-2017 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules
A, B, E, and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999,
along with the information required for a Subdivision application.
CARRIED
1102 2016-008-RZ, 11016, 11032 and 11038 240 Street, RS-3 to R-3
and RM--1
Staff report dated May 9, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Official
Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7326-2017 to designate land use
from Low/Medium Density Residential and Conservation to Medium
Density Residential and Conservation and to amend the conservation
boundary be given first and second reading and be forwarded to Public
Hearing, that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7218-2016 to rezone
Council Meeting Minutes
May 9, 2017
Page 7 of 10
from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7219-2016 to rezone from RS-
3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential
District) to permit a subdivision of approximately 8 single family lots and a
15 unit townhouse development be given second reading and be forwarded
to Public Hearing.
R/2017-183
It was moved and seconded
1) That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act,
opportunity for early and on-going consultation has been provided by
way of posting Bylaw No. 7326-2017 on the municipal website and
requiring that the applicant host a Development Information Meeting
(DIM), and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further
consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing
on the bylaw;
2) That Bylaw No. 7326-2017 be given first and second readings and
be forwarded to Public Hearing;
3) That Bylaw No. 7218-2016 be given second reading, and be
forwarded to Public Hearing;
4) That Bylaw 7219-2016 be given second reading, and be forwarded
to Public Hearing;
5) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive
Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in
the Agreement;
ii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule "A", Chapter
10.2 Albion Area Plan, Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan, and
Schedule “C” for conservation areas
iii) Road dedication on 240 Street and 110 Avenue, as required;
iv) Park dedication as required, including the possibility of
construction of walkways, and multipurpose trails; and removal
of all debris and garbage from park land;
v) Consolidation of the subject properties;
vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical
Report, which addresses the suitability of the subject properties
for the proposed development;
vii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the protection of the
Environmentally Sensitive areas (wetlands) on the subject
properties;
viii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the Visitor
Parking;
ix) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Tree Protection;
x) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater
Management;
xi) Removal of existing buildings;
Council Meeting Minutes
May 9, 2017
Page 8 of 10
xii) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be
submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is
any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject
properties. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required
to ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site.
xiii) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $4,100.00 per
townhouse dwelling unit and $5,100.00 per single family lot be
provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to
Community Amenity Contributions.
xiv) That a contribution in the amount of $3,100.00 per multifamily
unit and Single Family dwelling be paid for obtaining a higher
density with regard to the Density Bonus framework established
in the Albion Area Plan, estimated to be $71,300.00.
CARRIED
1103 2017-115-RZ, 10181 247 Street, RS-1b and R-1 to RS-1b
Staff report dated May 9, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7321-2017 to rezone from RS-1b (One Family Urban
[Medium Density) Residential) and R-1 (Residential District) to RS-1b (One
Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to rectify split-zoning currently
applying to the subject property be given first and second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing.
R/2017-184
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7321-2017 be given first and second reading and be
forwarded to Public Hearing.
CARRIED
1104 2017-077-DVP, 25929 116 Avenue
This item was withdrawn by the applicant.
CARRIED
1105 2016-455-DVP, 11770 Fraser Street
Staff report dated May 9, 2017 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal 2016-455-DVP to vary requirements of the
Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw to waive requirements for
the provision of street trees to permit construction of a commercial and
medical office building.
Council Meeting Minutes
May 9, 2017
Page 9 of 10
R/2017-186
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-455-DVP
respecting property located at 11770 Fraser Street.
CARRIED
1106 2016-455-DP, 11770 Fraser Street
Staff report dated May 9, 2017 recommending that the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal 2016-455-DP to permit construction of a 3
storey commercial/medical building and that the receipt of payment in lieu
for four parking stalls be acknowledged.
R/2017-187
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-455-DP
respecting property located at 11770 Fraser Street; and further
That Council acknowledge by resolution the receipt of $50,000.00 as
payment in lieu for four parking stalls for the subject property with legal
description Lot C, D.L. 398, Plan NWP5194.
CARRIED
1107 Award of Contract: Pavement Rehabilitation Program
Staff report dated May 9, 2017 recommending that the extension of the
2016 contract for Pavement Rehabilitation be awarded to BA Blacktop Ltd.
and that additional work locations be added under extra work provisions in
the contract and further that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign the
contract.
R/2017-188
It was moved and seconded
That the extension for the 2016 contract for Pavement Rehabilitation be
awarded to BA Blacktop Ltd., in the amount of $1,390,012.50 including
applicable taxes and further those additional work locations may be added
under the extra work provisions in the contract up to 25% of the value of
the contract ($347,503.17) including taxes, and furthermore that the
Corporate Officer be authorized to sign the contract up to the maximum
amount of $1,390,012.50 plus the contingency.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
May 9, 2017
Page 10 of 10
Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police) – Nil
Parks, Culture & Recreation – Nil
Administration – Nil
Other Committee Issues – Nil
1200 STAFF REPORTS – Nil
1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT – Nil
1400 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS – Nil
1500 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC – Nil
1600 ADJOURNMENT – 7:28 p.m.
_______________________________
T. Shymkiw, Acting Mayor
Certified Correct
___________________________________
L. Darcus, Corporate Officer
700 ITEMS ON CONSENT
700
701 Minutes
701
701.1 Development Agreements Committee
701.1
701.2 Minutes of Meetings of Committees and Commissions of Council
701.2
702 Reports
702
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 11-5600-05
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City of Maple Ridge (City) operates a Municipal Water Utility under permit by the Fraser Health
Authority (FHA) that requires an annual report be prepared and submitted to the FHA, and be
available to the public.
This report is for information and the attached “Drinking Water Quality Report 2016” includes an
outline of the regulatory framework, water quality monitoring data for 2016, and explanatory
comments on the data. A copy of the report will be placed in the public library and on the corporate
website.
In 2016, water quality within the City’s municipal water distribution system met the standards
detailed in the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation.
RECOMMENDATION:
This report is for information only and no resolution is required.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The City operates a Municipal Water Utility under the provisions of the provincial Local
Government Act, and under permit by the Provincial Ministry of Health Services - Fraser
Health Authority (FHA). Water quality requirements are stipulated by the Provincial Drinking
Water Protection Regulations and administered by the FHA.
The City, as a distributor and purveyor of drinking water, is reliant on the Greater Vancouver
Water District (GVWD) for source water quality control. While Coquitlam Lake is the primary
source of water delivered to Maple Ridge, the GVWD can supply Maple Ridge with water from
Seymour Lake in the event of disruptions at Coquitlam Lake.
702.1
The City’s drinking water system operating permit requires a water quality monitoring
program and that an annual report be prepared and submitted. While the monitoring
program provides a representative picture of drinking water quality within municipal mains, it
does not provide a definite picture of drinking water quality within buildings, where water
quality can change significantly due to pipe materials, standing times, temperature, and
other factors. It can be assumed that samples taken within buildings may be of different
quality than those taken from municipal mains. The City is not responsible for
testing/verifying water quality on private property.
Samples from 20 locations in the distribution system are taken weekly and are analyzed by
Metro Vancouver. The results are sent to the Operations and Engineering Departments and
to the FHA for review. In 2016, no samples tested positive for E. coli, and no samples
exceeded the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation microbiological standard of 10 total
coliforms per 100mL.
b) Strategic Alignment:
Financial Management
Council has directed that the City provide high quality municipal services to our citizens and
customers in a cost effective and efficient manner. The annual water quality monitoring
program is intended to ensure that the water delivered by the City’s utility is of high quality.
Smart Managed Growth
The Corporate Strategic Plan directs that municipal infrastructure be protected and managed
through the preparation of appropriate plans to ensure maintenance of the system. A
systematic water quality monitoring plan assists in ensuring that an effective water
distribution system is managed and maintained.
Intergovernmental Relations/Partnerships
Council has directed that the City develop and maintain strong positive working relationships
with the GVWD and other governmental agencies.
The City currently benefits from good working relationships with the GVWD and FHA in the
cooperative provision of quality drinking water. The annual monitoring program and report
facilitates this effective relationship.
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
Maple Ridge water utility customers expect that the investment in the network be maintained
to provide safe, reliable and high quality water. The annual reporting of water quality is a
means to meet the accountability that customers expect.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
As part of the Public Works and Development Services Division, the Engineering and
Operations Departments collaborate in the water utility’s planning, management, operation,
maintenance and water quality reporting to meet water quality objectives.
e) Policy Implications:
The reporting of water quality is consistent with the public policy approach of transparency
and accountability as well as meeting the requirements of the FHA.
CONCLUSIONS:
The City monitored drinking water quality in 2016 in accordance with the Provincial mandate.
Testing indicated that all samples met the standards detailed in the provincial Drinking Water
Protection Regulation. The “Drinking Water Quality Report 2016” documents the water quality
monitoring program and test results. The document was prepared in accordance with Fraser Health
Authority requirements and will be available to the public.
“Original signed by Joe Dingwall”
Prepared by: Joe Dingwall, PEng.
Manager of Utility Engineering
“Original signed by David Pollock”
Reviewed by: David Pollock, PEng.
Municipal Engineer
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, PEng.
General Manager: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
JD/mi
Attachment: City of Maple Ridge Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT
2016
May 2017
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
1
Table of Contents
List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................2
Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................................3
1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................4
2.0 Background ......................................................................................................................................5
2.1 Source Water ................................................................................................................................5
2.2 Distribution System ......................................................................................................................5
2.3 Facility Maintenance ....................................................................................................................5
2.4 Re-Chlorination Stations ..............................................................................................................5
3.0 Regulated Drinking Water Quality Parameters ..............................................................................6
3.1 Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring .....................................................................................6
3.2 Bacteriological Monitoring and Results ......................................................................................6
3.2.1 Escherichia Coli ....................................................................................................................6
3.2.2 Total Coliform .......................................................................................................................7
3.2.3 Frequency of Monitoring Samples ......................................................................................8
4.0 Unregulated Drinking Water Quality Parameters ...........................................................................9
4.1 Free Chlorine ................................................................................................................................9
4.2 Turbidity .....................................................................................................................................10
4.3 Heterotrophic Plate Count ........................................................................................................11
4.4 Disinfection Byproducts ............................................................................................................12
4.5 pH ...............................................................................................................................................13
4.6 Metals ........................................................................................................................................13
4.7 Temperature ..............................................................................................................................13
4.8 Vinyl Chloride .............................................................................................................................14
5.0 Response to Potential Contamination .........................................................................................14
6.0 Public Health Message from the Medical Health Officer ...........................................................14
7.0 Conclusion .....................................................................................................................................14
Appendix A: Sampling Station Locations .................................................................................................15
Appendix B: Residual Free Chlorine Figures ...........................................................................................17
Appendix C: Disinfection By-Products and pH .........................................................................................21
Appendix D: Metals and Vinyl Chloride ....................................................................................................24
Appendix E: Metals without Maximum Concentration Guidelines .........................................................27
Appendix F: Free Chlorine and Turbidity Charts ......................................................................................29
Appendix G: Weekly Sample Lab Results ................................................................................................40
Appendix H: Preventing Water-Borne Infections for People with Weakened Immune Systems ..........68
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
2
List of Abbreviations
L =litre
mL =milliliter
g =gram
mg =milligram
μg =microgram
ppb =parts per billion
°C =degree Celsius
E. coli =Escherichia coli
NTU =Nephelometric Turbidity Units
HPC =heterotrophic plate count
CFU =colony-forming unit
THM =triohalomethane
HAA =haloacetic acid
USEPA =United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cl2 =chlorine
MF =membrane filtration
EOCP =Environmental Operators Certification Program
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
3
Executive Summary
The City of Maple Ridge (City)is a distributor of water that is supplied and treated by Metro
Vancouver from its Coquitlam Lake source.In 2016, the City supplied water to approximately
80,000 people.
In accordance with the requirements of the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation, the City
sends weekly drinking water samples from 20 locations to a laboratory for analysis.Test results
are communicated to the City and the Fraser Health Authority every week and documented in
this annual report.In 2016, the City met all regulatory requirements for drinking water quality set
out in the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation:
No samples tested positive for E. coli
For each 30-day period, over 90% of samples had 0 total coliform per 100mL, and no
sample had more than 10 total coliform per 100mL
In monitoring unregulated drinking water quality parameters, the City follows the 2008 Water
Quality Monitoring and Reporting Plan for Metro Vancouver and Member Municipalities and
compares laboratory results to Health Canada recommendations for drinking water quality.In
2016,City water did not exceed any maximum limits recommended by Health Canada with the
exception of temperature.
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
4
1.0 Introduction
The City operates a Municipal Water Utility under the provisions of the provincial Local Government Act,
the BC Drinking Water Protection Act, and the BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation.These obligate
the City to meet several requirements, including:
Operating the utility under permit by the Provincial Ministry of Health Services
Engaging in water quality monitoring
The roles and responsibilities for the Province, Fraser Health Authority, and Metro Vancouver/City of
Maple Ridge (Water System Owners) are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Agency Responsibilities for Water Quality
Ministry of Healthy Living and Sport
Creates and “owns”
Drinking Water Protection Act and Regulation
Health Authority
Administration & Enforcement
of Legislation/Regulations
Water System Owners
Provision of Safe Drinking
Water + Notification of Water
Quality Problems
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
5
2.0 Background
The City is supplied with water from the protected and undeveloped Metro Vancouver watersheds.
Drinking water is conveyed to Maple Ridge residents through large diameter Metro Vancouver
transmission mains and approximately 400km of municipal water distribution pipes.
2.1 Source Water
Metro Vancouver supplies water to the City through a series of pipes linking Maple Ridge to the
Coquitlam, Seymour and Capilano watersheds.While the Coquitlam watershed is the primary source of
water for Maple Ridge, Metro Vancouver has the ability to convey water from the Seymour watershed
to Maple Ridge in the event of a service disruption at the Coquitlam source.Metro Vancouver operates
an ultra violet (UV) light water treatment facility at the Coquitlam watershed which disinfects source
water prior to it entering the distribution system.
2.2 Distribution System
The City distributes water to businesses, institutions and over 80,000 residents.Water distribution
infrastructure includes approximately 400km of water mains, over 19,000 service connections, 8
pump stations, and 8 reservoir sites.The Municipality also operates 6 re-chlorination stations to boost
residual chlorine levels in the distribution system.
The distribution system is managed by a team of professionals within the Public Works and
Development Services Division, under the leadership of the General Manager of Public Works and
Development Services.The operators of the system are EOCP Level 4 compliant.The system is also
regulated by Maple Ridge’s Water Service Bylaw 6002-2001.
2.3 Facility Maintenance
Water quality is influenced by water system maintenance and improvement strategies that are
implemented by the City’s Operations and Engineering Departments.
Water main flushing is a method of cleaning water mains.Flushing involves manipulating valves and
discharging water through fire hydrants or blow off points.The discharged water carries sediment and
other solids with it, thus cleaning the mains.The City cleaned 89km of the distribution system using
this method in 2016.In support of summer water conservation efforts, the City’s annual flushing
program is scheduled to take place only between October and May.The City currently cleans its
reservoirs on a 7 year cycle.
2.4 Re-Chlorination Stations
Chlorine levels are continually monitored at 6 re-chlorination stations throughout the distribution
system.Additional chlorine is automatically injected into the drinking water at these locations if
detected chlorine levels are low.The re-chlorination stations are inspected daily and adjusted as
necessary.
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
6
3.0 Regulated Drinking Water Quality Parameters
Metro Vancouver and the City are responsible for monitoring water quality in different parts of the
regional drinking water system.Metro Vancouver is responsible for monitoring the quality of water
leaving the treatment plants and within their transmission mains.The City is responsible for monitoring
water quality in distribution mains throughout Maple Ridge.
The quality of water distributed within the City is monitored in accordance with requirements set out in
provincial regulations.This section describes the monitoring program and water quality results for 2016.
3.1 Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring
Water quality is monitored for regulatory compliance on a weekly basis at the City’s 20 sampling
locations.
Sampling site locations and codes are illustrated on a map in Appendix A.Samples are taken weekly
by City Operations Department staff and sent to the Metro Vancouver laboratory for analysis.Metro
Vancouver staff members analyze the samples and communicate the results to City and Fraser Health
staff for review.Responses to undesirable results would vary from re-sampling to flushing water mains
to possibly issuing a boil water advisory, depending on confirmation and the significance of the
parameter of concern.
The monitoring program provides a representative picture of drinking water quality within municipal
water mains.However, it does not provide a definitive picture of drinking water quality within buildings
where water quality can change significantly due to pipe material, standing time, temperature, and
other factors.It can be assumed that samples taken within buildings will be of different quality than
those taken from municipal mains.The City is not responsible for water quality on private property.
3.2 Bacteriological Monitoring and Results
The BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation requires the City to carry out routine sampling and testing
for Escherichia coli (E. coli)and total coliform bacteria. These are considered “indicator organisms”
because their presence or absence provides an indication of microbial water quality. Figure 2 and
Figure 3 show Metro Vancouver Laboratory technicians processing a water sample and testing it for
the presence of coliform bacteria.
3.2.1 Escherichia Coli
E. coli is a type of coliform bacteria present exclusively in the feces of humans and other animals.
The existence of E. coli in a water sample indicates recent fecal contamination and the possible
presence of intestinal disease-causing bacteria, viruses, and protozoa.The BC Drinking Water
Protection Regulation standard for E. coli is none detectable per 100 ml.In 2016, no samples tested
positive for E. coli.
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
7
Figure 2: Metro Vancouver Laboratory technician
processing water sample in preparation for coliform
bacteria check
Figure 3: Metro Vancouver Laboratory technician
checking water sample for coliform bacteria
3.2.2 Total Coliform
The total coliform group of bacteria is composed of various types with similar characteristics. The
natural niches for members of this group range from being fecal-specific, such as E. coli, to being
widely distributed in water, soil, and vegetation.The BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation
standards for total coliform are described in Table 1.
Table 1: BC Drinking Water Protection Regulation Standards for Total Coliform
Occurrence Standard
1 Sample in a 30 day period No detectable total coliform per 100mL
More than 1 sample in a 30 day
period
At least 90% of samples have 0 total coliform per 100mL
and no sample has more than 10 total coliform per 100mL
In 2016 there were no samples with detectable total coliform per 100mL. Table 2 lists the annual
number of samples found to contain total coliform between 2006 and 201 6.
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
8
Table 2: Total Coliform Results by Year
Year Number of Samples
with Total Coliform
2016 0
2015 3
2014 0
2013 0
2012 2
2011 1
2010 3
2009 1
2008 0
2007 5
2006 0
3.2.3 Frequency of Monitoring Samples
The monitoring frequency for the detection of E. coli and total coliforms is stipulated by the BC
Drinking Water Protection Regulation.Current requirements are identified in Table 3. With a total of
20 weekly sampling sites at various points in the City’s water distribution system, the average
number of monthly samples (87) exceeds the stipulated value of 80 (based on a directly serviced
population of approximately 80,000). As the City’s population grows, additional sampling sites will be
added.
Table 3:Monitoring Frequency for the detection of E. coli and total coliforms
Population Served Target No. of Samples per Month
Less than 5,000 4
5,000 to 90,000 1 per 1,000 of population
More than 90,000 90 plus 1 per 10,000 of population in excess of 90,000
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
9
4.0 Unregulated Drinking Water Quality Parameters
This section reports on water quality parameters that are not regulated through legislation.
4.1 Free Chlorine
In the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality, Health Canada states that for health
considerations, a “guideline value [maximum acceptable concentration level for chlorine] is not
necessary due to low toxicity at concentrations found in drinking water.”
With respect to a minimum chlorine concentration, no regulations exist for British C olumbia.However,
Health Canada reports the following:
“the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Surface Water Treatment Rule requires a minimum
disinfectant residual of 0.2 mg/L for water entering the distribution system and that a detectable level
be maintained throughout the distribution system.The World Health Organization (WHO) has
suggested that, for areas with little risk of cholera or related outbreaks, a free chlorine residual range
of 0.2-0.5 mg/L be maintained at all points in the supply.In general, a free chlorine residual of 0.2
mg/L is considered a minimum level for the control of bacterial regrowth in the distribution system.”1
Health Canada also reports that “free chlorine concentrations in most Canadian drinking water
distribution systems range from 0.04 to 2.0 mg/L.”2
Residual chlorine concentrations are affected by various parameters such as water age, turbidity
levels, pipe material, and temperature.
Table 5 and the maps in Appendix B show that:
In 2016, the average free chlorine residual at all stations in Maple Ridge was greater than 0.2
mg/L with the exception of station 441.
Stations 441 and 449 had the greatest number of samples with chlorine residuals less than
0.2 mg/L.
Detailed free chlorine residual data charted in Appendix F and tabulated in Appendix G indicates that
13 of the 1,040 samples had no chlorine residual.All 13 samples in 2016 with no chlorine were taken
at sampling stations in low-demand locations, stations 436,439 and 441.Of the samples with
undetectable chlorine levels,no samples had detectable total coliforms or elevated HPC results (see
Table 4).
1 Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality -Guideline Technical Document -Chlorine -(Health Canada, 2009)
2 Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality -Guideline Technical Document -Chlorine -(Health Canada, 2009)
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
10
Table 4: Water Quality Parameters for Samples with Undetectable Chlorine
Sample
name Sample Location Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
Ecoli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU/
mL
Temp.
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/
100mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of
Ansell St.8-Nov-16 0 <1 4 11 <1 0.29
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of
Ansell St.15-Nov-16 0 <1 4 12 <1 0.28
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of
Ansell St.22-Nov-16 0 <1 2 11 <1 0.26
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St.
(W. of 256 St.)8-Nov-16 0 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 26-Apr-16 0 <1 2 12 <1 0.25
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 14-Jun-16 0 <1 <2 16 <1 0.28
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 21-Jun-16 0 <1 <2 15 <1 0.27
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 19-Jul-16 0 <1 <2 18 <1 0.24
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 6-Sep-16 0 <1 2 18 <1 0.22
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 1-Nov-16 0 <1 12 13 <1 0.35
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 8-Nov-16 0 <1 2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-441 132 Ave.@ Cedar Way 22-Nov-16 0 <1 10 12 <1 0.33
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 6-Dec-16 0 <1 36 9 <1 0.33
4.2 Turbidity
Turbidity, measured in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU), is a measure of water clarity.There are no
provincial guidelines for turbidity within a distribution system.Average turbidity values at all sample
stations are displayed below in Table 5. Detailed turbidity data for 2016 is charted in Appendix F and
tabulated in Appendix G.
Variations in turbidity within a distribution system are normal. Higher levels may be associated with
turbidity in source water or local system events such as high flow rates from unidirectional flushing,
fire-fighting, or water main breaks.In the event that a high level of turbidity is detected, the City will
determine whether this is expected due to system operations.If the event is unexpected, the City will
confirm turbidity level and flush the mains should high turbidity levels persist.
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
11
Table 5: 2015 Chlorine Residual and Turbidity Results by Site
Station
Total
Samples
Taken
Average
Free
Chlorine
in mg/L
Average
Turbidity
in NTU
Samples
Taken with
Free
Chlorine
Greater
Than or
Equal to 0.2
mg/L (#)
Samples
Taken
with Free
Chlorine
Less Than
0.2 mg/L
(#)
Samples
Taken with
Free
Chlorine
Greater
Than or
Equal to 0.2
mg/L (%)
Samples
Taken
with Free
Chlorine
Less Than
0.2 mg/L
(%)
MPR-400 52 0.32 0.26 45 7 87%13%
MPR-431 52 0.86 0.33 52 0 100%0%
MPR-432 52 0.57 0.33 51 1 98%2%
MPR-433 52 0.76 0.32 52 0 100%0%
MPR-434 52 0.69 0.31 52 0 100%0%
MPR-435 52 0.38 0.29 48 4 92%8%
MPR-436 52 0.74 0.28 48 4 92%8%
MPR-437 52 0.90 0.61 51 1 98%2%
MPR-438 52 0.81 0.31 51 1 98%2%
MPR-439 52 0.45 0.30 43 9 83%17%
MPR-440 52 0.88 0.36 52 0 100%0%
MPR-441 52 0.12 0.29 9 43 17%83%
MPR-442 52 0.62 0.34 52 0 100%0%
MPR-443 52 0.76 0.32 52 0 100%0%
MPR-444 52 0.43 0.30 50 2 96%4%
MPR-445 52 0.55 0.28 45 7 87%13%
MPR-446 52 0.59 0.38 45 7 87%13%
MPR-447 52 0.71 0.33 51 1 98%2%
MPR-448 52 0.59 0.32 52 0 100%0%
MPR-449 52 0.20 0.26 26 26 50%50%
4.3 Heterotrophic Plate Count
Health Canada does not suggest a maximum acceptable concentration for heterotrophs. Instead, it
recommends that increases in heterotrophic plate count (HPC) concentrations above baselines levels
be considered undesirable.Table 6 shows the annual number of samples with HPCs over 500
CFU/mL between 2006 and 2016.In response to HPC counts at or above this level, the City will re-test
and flush water mains. HPC data for each sample taken in 201 6 is provided in Appendix G.
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
12
Table 6: HPC Results by Year
Year Number of Samples with
HPC > 500 CFU/mL
2016 0
2015 5
2014 0
2013 0
2012 0
2011 1
2010 1
2009 1
2008 4
2007 1
2006 7
4.4 Disinfection Byproducts
Disinfection byproducts such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) can form when
chlorine used to disinfect drinking water reacts with naturally occurring organic matter.
Health risks may be associated with long-term exposure to high levels of THMs and HAAs.
Trihalomethanes
Health Canada considers THMs to be possibly carcinogenic to humans. Health Canada also reports
that “High Levels of THMs may also have an effect on pregnancy. A California study found that
pregnant women who drank large amounts of tap water with high THMs had an increased risk of
miscarriage. These studies do not prove that there is a link between THMs and cancer or miscarriage.
However, they do show the need for further research in this area to confirm potential health effects.”3
Health Canada recommends that the running average (last 4 quarters) for Total THMs remain below
100 ppb.Quarterly samples were taken at four sites for THM analysis. The running quarterly average
THM concentration in the samples remained below 100 ppb at all locations. Detailed THM test results
are provided in Appendix C.
Haloacetic acids
Health Canada considers HAAs to be possibly carcinogenic to humans. Health Canada recommends
that the running average (last 4 quarters)total HAA concentration be below 80 ppb.Quarterly samples
were taken at four sites for HAA analysis. The running quarterly average HAA concentration remained
below 80 ppb for all locations.Detailed HAA test results are provided in Appendix C.
Following elevated HAA levels at station MPR-438 in 2015, the City increased the sampling and testing
frequency at this location.The 10 additional samples taken at MPR-438 in 2016 had HAA levels
ranging from 30 to 78 ppb. The results for the additional tests are displayed in Appendix C.
3 Health Canada Website http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/iyh-vsv/environ/chlor-eng.php accessed January 2015
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
13
4.5 pH
pH is a measure of the acid-base equilibrium of water. pH is of concern in a water distribution system
because at low values water becomes corrosive while at high values chlorine disinfection is less
efficient. Health Canada indicates that an acceptable pH range for drinking water is 6.5 –8.5 pH units.
8 distribution system samples were tested for pH. Test results ranged of 7.1 to 7.5 pH units (See
Appendix C).
4.6 Metals
The City tested samples at 3 monitoring sites for concentrations of various metals. Test results are
shown in Appendix D, along with maximum concentration limits suggested by He alth Canada and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). USEPA values are reference d only where Health
Canada does not recommend a limit. As shown in Appendix D, all measured metal concentrations were
below the limits recommended by Health Canada and the USEPA. Neither Health Canada nor the
USEPA suggest drinking water quality guidelines for calcium, cobalt, magnesium, molybden um, nickel
or potassium. Additional information related to concentrations of these metals is provided in Appendix
E.
4.7 Temperature
Health Canada sets an aesthetic objective of 15°C for drinking water. Water temperature exceeding
this objective can result in consumer complaints and the growth of nuisance organisms that could lead
to unpleasant tastes and odors. Figure 4 shows average monthly drinking water temperatures in Maple
Ridge. In July, August, and September the average monthly temperatures were 15.8,17.8, 16.8
respectively exceeding Health Canada’s objective. Detailed temperature information is provided in
Appendix G.
Figure 4: Average Monthly Drinking Water Temperature Chart
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecTemperature (Degree Celsius)Average Monthly Drinking Water Temperature
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
14
4.8 Vinyl Chloride
The concentration of vinyl chloride was tested in 6 samples during 2016. As indicated in Appendix D,
all results were non-detectable (less than 1 μg/L), less than the Health Canada Guideline of 2 μg/L.
5.0 Response to Potential Contamination
In the event that contaminants are detected in the water distributio n system, a series of protocols will be
carried out to communicate the event to City and Fraser Health Authority staff. The City and Fraser
Health will then work together to confirm the incident, determine the nature of the risk to public health,
and issue public notices as appropriate. Depending on the level of risk a water quality advisory, boil
water notice, or do-not-use water notice could be issued. Public notices would be communicated through
various media. The City’s contamination response plan is embedded in emergency planning documents.
6.0 Public Health Message from the Medical Health Officer
Fraser Health’s Medical Health Officer has requested that a fact sheet entitled “Preventing Water-Borne
Infections for People with weakened Immune Systems”be included in this report. The fact sheet is
presented in Appendix H.Additionally, the Medical Health Officer has requested the following message
be included in this report:
Anytime the water in a particular faucet has not been used for six hours or longer, “flush” your cold-
water pipes by running the water until you notice a change in temperature. (This could take as little as
five to thirty seconds if there has been recent heavy water use such as showering or toilet flushing.
Otherwise, it could take two minutes or longer.) The more time water has been sitting in your home’s
pipes, the more lead it may contain.
Use only water from the cold-tap for drinking, cooking, and especially making baby formula. Hot water
is likely to contain higher levels of lead.
The two actions recommended above are very important to the health of your family. They will probably
be effective in reducing lead levels because most of the lead in household water usually comes from
the plumbing in your house, not the local water supply.
7.0 Conclusion
The City monitored drinking water quality in 2016 in accordance with provincial regulations.Over 1,000
drinking water samples were obtained from the municipal water distribution system at 20 locations
throughout the City. Metro Vancouver Laboratory testing indicated that all samples met the BC Drinking
Water Protection Regulation Standards.
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
15
Appendix A: Sampling Station Locations
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
16
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
17
Appendix B: Residual Free Chlorine Figures
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
18
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
19
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
20
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
21
Appendix C: Disinfection By-Products and pH
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
22
Sample Site Sample Location Date Sampled
THM (ppb)HAA (ppb)pH UnitsBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorodibromomethaneChloroformTotal TrihalomethanesRunning Average(Last 4 Quarters)Dibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidTrichloroacetic AcidTotal Haloacetic AcidRunning Average(Last 4 Quarters)Maximum Acceptable Concentration (Health Canada Guidelines for
Canadian Drinking Water Quality)16 100 80 6.5-8.5
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.19/05/2015 <1 <1 <1 43 43 <0.5 18 <1 8 25.2 52
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.18/08/2015 1 <1 <1 37 38 <0.5 20 <1 9 31.5 62
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.24/11/2015 <1 <1 <1 28 30 <0.5 17 <1 9 22.9 49
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.01/03/2016 <1 <1 <1 29 30 36 <0.5 17 <1 9 22.9 50 53
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.31/05/2016 <1 <1 <1 35 35 34 <0.5 12 <1 8 12.1 33 48
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.30/08/2016 1 <1 <1 27 30 32 <0.5 16 <1 9 23 48 45
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.18/10/2016 <1 <1 <1 42 44 35 <0.5 20 <1 10 48 79 52
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 19/05/2015 <1 <1 <1 44 44 <0.5 16 <1 4 26.2 48
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 18/08/2015 1 <1 <1 44 45 <0.5 12 <1 6 37 57
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 24/11/2015 <1 <1 <1 34 36 <0.5 18 <1 7 27 53
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 01/03/2016 <1 <1 <1 29 30 39 <0.5 12 <1 7 18 38 49 7.1
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 31/05/2016 <1 <1 <1 38 39 38 <0.5 9 <1 7 14.4 31 45 7.1
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 30/08/2016 2 <1 <1 33 36 35 <0.5 12 <1 7 26.2 46 42 7.4
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 18/10/2016 1 <1 <1 41 43 37 <0.5 12 <1 6 46.9 66 45 7.3
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.19/05/2015 <1 <1 <1 55 56 <0.5 29 <1 9 47.5 86
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.18/08/2015 <1 <1 <1 37 38 <0.5 27 <1 8 29.2 65
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.24/11/2015 <1 <1 <1 52 54 <0.5 29 <1 12 49.8 91
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.01/03/2016 <1 <1 <1 41 42 47 <0.5 19 <1 11 27.9 58 75 7.2
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.31/05/2016 <1 <1 <1 43 44 44 <0.5 17 <1 10 21.8 50 66 7.2
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.30/08/2016 1 <1 <1 35 38 44 <0.5 21 <1 11 26.3 59 64 7.5
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.18/10/2016 1 <1 <1 48 51 44 <0.5 23 <1 11 63.6 99 66 7.4
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.19/05/2015 <1 <1 <1 44 44 <0.5 19 <1 9 22.1 50
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.18/08/2015 <1 <1 <1 27 28 <0.5 22 <1 9 19.5 51
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.24/11/2015 <1 <1 <1 28 30 <0.5 20 <1 10 17.9 48
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.01/03/2016 <1 <1 <1 29 30 33 <0.5 13 <1 9 12.9 35 46
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.31/05/2016 <1 <1 <1 32 32 30 <0.5 12 <1 8 11.3 32 41
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.30/08/2016 1 <1 <1 25 28 30 <0.5 16 <1 8 19.2 44 40
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.18/10/2016 <1 <1 <1 38 39 32 <0.5 20 <1 10 34.4 65 44
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
23
Additional HAA Samples at Station MPR-438
Sample Site Sample Location Date Sampled
THM (ppb)HAA (ppb)pH UnitsBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorodibromomethaneChloroformTotal TrihalomethanesRunning Average(Last 4 Quarters)Dibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidTrichloroacetic AcidTotal Haloacetic AcidRunning Average(Last 4 Quarters)Maximum Acceptable Concentration (Health Canada Guidelines for
Canadian Drinking Water Quality)16 100 80 6.5-8.5
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.17/05/2016 <0.1 23 <0.2 <1.7 27 51
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.24/05/2016 <0.1 18 <0.2 <1.7 20 38
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.31/05/2016 <0.1 17 <0.2 <1.7 15 32
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.07/06/2016 <0.1 24 <0.2 <1.7 31 55
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.12/07/2016 <0.1 33 <0.2 <1.7 36 69
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.25/07/2016 <0.1 34 <0.2 <1.7 29 62
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.09/08/2016 <0.1 36 <0.2 <1.7 42 78
MPR-438 125 Ave.West off 256 St.23/08/2016 <0.1 28 <0.2 <1.7 28 55
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.06/09/2016 <0.1 21 <0.2 <1.7 9.5 30
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.18/10/2016 <0.1 22 <0.2 <1.7 32 54
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
24
Appendix D:Metals and Vinyl Chloride
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
25
Metal Concentration
Sample
Name Sample Location Sampled
Date
Aluminium Total (µg/L)Antimony Total (µg/L)Arsenic Total (µg/L)Barium Total (µg/L)Boron Total (µg/L)Cadmium Total (µg/L)Calcium Total (µg/L)ChromiumTotal (µg/L)Cobalt Total (µg/L)Copper Total (µg/L)Iron Total (µg/L)Lead Total (µg/L)Magnesium Total (µg/L)Manganese Total (µg/L)Mercury Total (µg/L)Molybdenum Total (µg/L)Nickel Total (µg/L)Potassium Total (µg/L)Selenium Total (µg/L)SilverTotal (µg/L)Sodium Total (µg/L)Zinc Total (µg/L)Maximum Acceptable Concentration
(Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water
Quality)
200 6 10
100050005
none50
none1000300 10
none50 1
nonenonenone50
none200,0005000Maximum Acceptable Concentration
(USEPA National Secondary Drinking Water
Regulations)nonenonenonenonenonenone100
Reason Guideline Established -Health (H)
or Aesthetic (A)A H H H H H H A A H A H H A A A
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St.17-May-16 89 <0.5 <0.5 2.3 <10 <0.2 925 0.28 <0.5 22.4 49 <0.5 92 4.1 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 108 <0.5 <0.5 5510 <3.0
MPR-435 240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 17-May-16 80 <0.5 <0.5 2.2 <10 <0.2 1160 0.33 <0.5 4.3 44 <0.5 94 1.9 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 111 <0.5 <0.5 6480 <3.0
MPR-446 128th Ave and
Willow Place 17-May-16 90 <0.5 <0.5 3.4 <10 <0.2 1400 0.31 <0.5 3.7 68 <0.5 92 3.0 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 120 <0.5 <0.5 11300 3.7
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk
Rd. @ 201B St.25-Oct-16 84 <0.5 <0.5 2.5 <10 <0.2 1070 0.26 <0.5 7.9 48 <0.5 99 1.8 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 129 <0.5 <0.5 6380 <3.0
MPR-435 240 St. South of
Abernethy Way 25-Oct-16 84 <0.5 <0.5 3.6 <10 <0.2 1180 0.28 <0.5 10.6 51 <0.5 102 1.3 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 129 <0.5 <0.5 6550 <3.0
MPR-446 128th Ave and
Willow Place 25-Oct-16 82 <0.5 <0.5 3.8 <10 <0.2 1700 0.25 <0.5 1.9 74 <0.5 99 4.7 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 137 <0.5 <0.5 11700 <3.0
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
26
Vinyl Chloride Concentration
Sample Site
Number Sample Reported Name Sampled date Vinyl Chloride
(mg/L)
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.14-Jun-16 <0.0010
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.6-Dec-16 <0.0010
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 14-Jun-16 <0.0010
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 6-Dec-16 <0.0010
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 14-Jun-16 <0.0010
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 6-Dec-16 <0.0010
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
27
Appendix E: Metals without Maximum Concentration Guidelines
Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA suggest maximum concentration guidelines for calcium, cobalt,
magnesium, molybdenum, nickel, or potassium in drinking water.Additional information related to these
metals is provided below.
Calcium
Health Canada reports “there is no evidence of adverse health effects specifically attributable to calcium in
drinking water. Insufficient data are available to set a specific value for an aesthetic objective for calcium in
drinking water. A guideline for calcium has therefore not been specified –Measurements of water samples
collected from 71 municipalities across Canada showed that the mean calcium concentrations were 21,400
μg/L for distributed water”.4
Cobalt
Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for cobalt. However, as a
point of reference one might consider that the BC Ministry of Environment recommends that the maximum
concentration of total cobalt should not exceed 110 μg/L to “protect aquatic life in the freshwater
environment from acute effects of cobalt”.5
Magnesium
Health Canada reports “there is no evidence of adverse health effects specifically attributable to magnesium
in drinking water. A guideline for magnesium has therefore not been specified. Two national surveys of
drinking water supplies, encompassing 115 municipalities across Canada, were conducted in 1976 and
1977; magnesium concentrations in distributed water ranged from 200 to 59,500 μg/L”.6
Molybdenum
Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for Molybdenum. However,
as a point of reference one might consider that the BC Ministry of Environment recommends a maximum of
50 μg/L for various water uses such as irrigation and drinking water for livestock.7
Nickel
Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for nickel. However, as a
point of reference one might consider that the BC Ministry of Environment recommends a maximum
concentration of 8.3 μg/L nickel for marine aquatic life.8
4 Guidelines For Canadian Drinking Water Quality –Supporting Documents –Calcium, Health Canada (1978, updated 1987)
5 Ambient Water Quality Guidelines for Cobalt Overview Report, BC Ministry of Environment (2004)
6 Guidelines For Canadian Drinking Water Quality –Supporting Documents-Magnesium, Health Canada (1978, updated
1987)
7 Water Quality Criteria for Molybdenum Overview Report, BC Ministry of Environment (1986)
8 A compendium of Working Water Quality Guidelines for British Columbia, BC Ministry of Environment (2008)
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
28
Potassium
Neither Health Canada nor the USEPA publish a drinking water quality standard for potassium. However, as
a point of reference one might consider that the BC Ministry of Environment recommends a maximum
concentration of 373, 000 μg/L potassium for freshwater aquatic live.9
9 A Compendium of Working Water Quality Guidelines for British Columbia, BC Ministry of Environment (2008)
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
29
Appendix F: Free Chlorine and Turbidity Charts
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
30
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -400
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -431
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
Highest chlorine was 1.54
mg/L on October 11, 2016.
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
31
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -432
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -433
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
32
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -434
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -435
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
33
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -436
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2015 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-437
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
Highest turbidity was 16
NTU on May 10, 2016.
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
34
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -438
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
Highest chlorine was 1.5
mg/L on March 8, 2016.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR -439
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
35
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-440
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-441
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
36
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-442
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
Highest turbidity was 1.7
NTU on November 15, 2016.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-443
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
37
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-444
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-445
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
38
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-446
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
Highest chlorine was 1.7
mg/L on February 2, 2016.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-447
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
39
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-448
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decmg/L Free Chlorine / Nephelometric Turbidity Units2016 Free Chlorine & Turbidity Data for Sample Site MPR-449
Free Chlorine Turbidity Target Chlorine Concentration
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
40
Appendix G:Weekly Sample Lab Results
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
41
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 5-Jan-16 0.05 <1 360 10 <1 0.21
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 12-Jan-16 0.03 <1 220 9 <1 0.22
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 19-Jan-16 0.08 <1 92 9 <1 0.24
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 26-Jan-16 0.29 <1 <2 9 <1 0.27
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 2-Feb-16 0.43 <1 <2 9 <1 0.33
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 9-Feb-16 0.54 <1 <2 9 <1 0.37
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 16-Feb-16 0.32 <1 <2 9 <1 0.33
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 23-Feb-16 0.3 <1 4 9 <1 0.32
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 1-Mar-16 0.24 <1 110 9 <1 0.26
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 8-Mar-16 0.3 <1 <2 9 <1 0.28
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 15-Mar-16 0.25 <1 <2 9 <1 0.25
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 22-Mar-16 0.35 <1 <2 9 <1 0.26
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 29-Mar-16 0.44 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 5-Apr-16 0.39 <1 <2 10 <1 0.31
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 12-Apr-16 0.37 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 19-Apr-16 0.28 <1 <2 10 <1 0.22
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 26-Apr-16 0.26 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 4-May-16 0.26 <1 <2 11 <1 0.25
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 10-May-16 0.35 <1 2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 17-May-16 0.26 <1 4 13 <1 0.22
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 24-May-16 0.24 <1 <2 13 <1 0.19
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 31-May-16 0.23 <1 <2 13 <1 0.34
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 7-Jun-16 0.23 <1 2 14 <1 0.28
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 14-Jun-16 0.29 <1 <2 14 <1 0.22
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 21-Jun-16 0.19 <1 4 14 <1 0.22
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 28-Jun-16 0.41 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 5-Jul-16 0.29 <1 <2 15 <1 0.26
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 12-Jul-16 0.29 <1 2 15 <1 0.18
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 19-Jul-16 0.28 <1 <2 15 <1 0.2
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 26-Jul-16 0.49 <1 2 17 <1 0.19
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 2-Aug-16 0.33 <1 4 17 <1 0.19
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 9-Aug-16 0.4 <1 10 18 <1 0.23
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 16-Aug-16 0.88 <1 Cont.17 <1 0.3
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 23-Aug-16 0.32 <1 12 18 <1 0.25
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 30-Aug-16 0.36 <1 14 17 <1 0.35
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 6-Sep-16 0.36 <1 16 17 <1 0.19
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 13-Sep-16 0.62 <1 <2 17 <1 0.21
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 20-Sep-16 0.4 <1 6 17 <1 0.23
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 27-Sep-16 0.5 <1 <2 16 <1 0.2
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
42
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 4-Oct-16 0.39 <1 8 16 <1 0.15
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 11-Oct-16 0.27 <1 8 15 <1 0.17
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 18-Oct-16 0.38 <1 2 15 <1 0.29
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 25-Oct-16 0.37 <1 6 14 <1 0.3
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 1-Nov-16 0.13 <1 2 14 <1 0.32
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 8-Nov-16 0.28 <1 <2 14 <1 0.33
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 15-Nov-16 0.1 <1 12 13 <1 0.27
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 22-Nov-16 0.26 <1 4 13 <1 0.29
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 29-Nov-16 0.5 <1 10 12 <1 0.35
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 6-Dec-16 0.2 <1 10 12 <1 0.32
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 13-Dec-16 0.42 <1 <2 10 <1 0.27
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 20-Dec-16 0.02 <1 2 10 <1 0.23
MPR-400 Powell Ave. West of 203rd Street 28-Dec-16 0.39 <1 NA 8 <1 0.2
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.5-Jan-16 0.95 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.12-Jan-16 0.91 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.19-Jan-16 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.26-Jan-16 0.82 <1 <2 6 <1 0.34
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.2-Feb-16 0.8 <1 <2 6 <1 0.36
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.9-Feb-16 1.2 <1 <2 6 <1 0.42
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.16-Feb-16 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.58
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.23-Feb-16 0.83 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.1-Mar-16 0.63 <1 <2 8 <1 0.32
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.8-Mar-16 0.61 <1 <2 8 <1 0.37
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.15-Mar-16 0.69 <1 <2 8 <1 0.27
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.22-Mar-16 0.68 <1 <2 8 <1 0.37
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.29-Mar-16 0.75 <1 <2 9 <1 0.31
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.5-Apr-16 0.75 <1 <2 9 <1 0.27
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.12-Apr-16 0.87 <1 <2 10 <1 0.31
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.19-Apr-16 0.81 <1 40 11 <1 0.4
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.26-Apr-16 0.74 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.3-May-16 0.58 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.10-May-16 0.73 <1 <2 13 <1 0.29
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.17-May-16 0.71 <1 <2 14 <1 0.28
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.24-May-16 0.81 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.31-May-16 0.73 <1 <2 15 <1 0.32
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.7-Jun-16 0.61 <1 <2 13 <1 0.31
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.14-Jun-16 0.93 <1 <2 13 <1 0.3
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.21-Jun-16 0.85 <1 <2 13 <1 0.28
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.28-Jun-16 1.02 <1 <2 14 <1 0.47
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
43
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.5-Jul-16 1.03 <1 <2 15 <1 0.25
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd.@ 201B St.12-Jul-16 0.98 <1 <2 15 <1 0.22
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.19-Jul-16 0.82 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.26-Jul-16 1.02 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.2-Aug-16 1 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.9-Aug-16 0.94 <1 <2 18 <1 0.38
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.16-Aug-16 0.94 <1 <2 17 <1 0.27
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.23-Aug-16 0.91 <1 88 19 <1 0.34
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.30-Aug-16 0.87 <1 4 18 <1 0.27
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.6-Sep-16 0.85 <1 2 18 <1 0.57
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.13-Sep-16 0.82 <1 <2 18 <1 0.32
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.20-Sep-16 0.8 <1 <2 17 <1 0.36
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.27-Sep-16 0.94 <1 2 17 <1 0.38
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.4-Oct-16 0.84 <1 <2 16 <1 0.16
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.11-Oct-16 1.54 <1 <2 15 <1 0.19
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.18-Oct-16 0.77 <1 <2 13 <1 0.51
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.25-Oct-16 0.9 <1 <2 13 <1 0.33
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.1-Nov-16 0.78 <1 <2 12 <1 0.42
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.8-Nov-16 0.78 <1 2 12 <1 0.3
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.15-Nov-16 0.74 <1 <2 11 <1 0.37
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.22-Nov-16 0.8 <1 2 11 <1 0.38
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.29-Nov-16 0.64 <1 2 10 <1 0.32
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.6-Dec-16 0.83 <1 <2 9 <1 0.57
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.13-Dec-16 0.97 <1 <2 7 <1 0.28
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.20-Dec-16 1.03 <1 <2 6 <1 0.35
MPR-431 Dewdney Trunk Rd. @ 201B St.28-Dec-16 0.79 <1 NA 6 <1 0.22
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.5-Jan-16 0.82 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.12-Jan-16 0.75 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.19-Jan-16 0.85 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.26-Jan-16 0.61 <1 <2 7 <1 0.33
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.2-Feb-16 0.9 <1 <2 7 <1 0.57
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.9-Feb-16 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.44
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.16-Feb-16 0.81 <1 <2 7 <1 0.43
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.23-Feb-16 0.46 <1 10 7 <1 0.4
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.1-Mar-16 0.67 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.8-Mar-16 0.76 <1 <2 7 <1 0.4
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.15-Mar-16 0.91 <1 <2 8 <1 0.27
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.22-Mar-16 0.53 <1 <2 8 <1 0.28
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.29-Mar-16 0.49 <1 <2 8 <1 0.26
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
44
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.5-Apr-16 0.65 <1 <2 9 <1 0.48
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.12-Apr-16 0.63 <1 <2 9 <1 0.29
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.19-Apr-16 0.69 <1 <2 9 <1 0.32
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.26-Apr-16 0.64 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.4-May-16 0.61 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.10-May-16 0.6 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.17-May-16 0.3 <1 <2 12 <1 0.28
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.24-May-16 0.39 <1 <2 13 <1 0.22
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.31-May-16 0.55 <1 10 12 <1 0.38
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.7-Jun-16 0.3 <1 4 13 <1 0.33
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.14-Jun-16 0.57 <1 <2 13 <1 0.32
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.21-Jun-16 0.52 <1 <2 13 <1 0.28
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.28-Jun-16 0.62 <1 <2 14 <1 0.46
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.5-Jul-16 0.4 <1 <2 15 <1 0.26
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.12-Jul-16 0.51 <1 <2 15 <1 0.24
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.19-Jul-16 0.3 <1 <2 15 <1 0.25
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.26-Jul-16 0.53 <1 <2 16 <1 0.31
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.2-Aug-16 0.51 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.9-Aug-16 0.34 <1 6 17 <1 0.35
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.16-Aug-16 0.38 <1 <2 18 <1 0.29
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.23-Aug-16 0.4 <1 4 18 <1 0.25
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.30-Aug-16 0.42 <1 <2 18 <1 0.24
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.6-Sep-16 0.46 <1 <2 17 <1 0.29
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.13-Sep-16 0.44 <1 2 17 <1 0.28
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.20-Sep-16 0.18 <1 <2 17 <1 0.36
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.27-Sep-16 0.66 <1 <2 16 <1 0.32
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.4-Oct-16 0.64 <1 2 15 <1 0.21
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.11-Oct-16 0.51 <1 <2 14 <1 0.27
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.18-Oct-16 0.59 <1 <2 12 <1 0.42
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.25-Oct-16 0.58 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.1-Nov-16 0.5 <1 <2 11 <1 0.41
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.8-Nov-16 0.62 <1 <2 12 <1 0.36
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.15-Nov-16 0.56 <1 <2 10 <1 0.37
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.22-Nov-16 0.48 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.29-Nov-16 0.51 <1 <2 9 <1 0.61
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.6-Dec-16 0.58 <1 <2 8 <1 0.41
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.13-Dec-16 0.71 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.20-Dec-16 0.62 <1 2 6 <1 0.28
MPR-432 224 St. @ 122 Ave.28-Dec-16 0.57 <1 NA 5 <1 0.23
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
45
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.5-Jan-16 0.66 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.12-Jan-16 0.71 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.19-Jan-16 0.91 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.26-Jan-16 0.59 <1 <2 6 <1 0.34
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.2-Feb-16 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.77
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.9-Feb-16 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.48
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.16-Feb-16 0.94 <1 <2 6 <1 0.42
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.23-Feb-16 0.7 <1 <2 6 <1 0.41
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.1-Mar-16 0.74 <1 2 7 <1 0.31
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.8-Mar-16 1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.35
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.15-Mar-16 0.59 <1 <2 7 <1 0.26
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.22-Mar-16 0.74 <1 <2 7 <1 0.31
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.29-Mar-16 0.66 <1 <2 7 <1 0.25
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.5-Apr-16 0.82 <1 <2 8 <1 0.46
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.12-Apr-16 0.81 <1 <2 9 <1 0.3
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.19-Apr-16 0.69 <1 <2 9 <1 0.27
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.26-Apr-16 0.79 <1 <2 8 <1 0.3
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.3-May-16 0.66 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.10-May-16 0.45 <1 2 11 <1 0.32
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.17-May-16 0.55 <1 2 11 <1 0.28
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.24-May-16 0.65 <1 2 11 <1 0.24
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.31-May-16 0.8 <1 2 11 <1 0.28
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.7-Jun-16 0.47 <1 <2 12 <1 0.31
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.14-Jun-16 0.64 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.21-Jun-16 0.66 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.28-Jun-16 0.95 <1 <2 13 <1 0.39
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.5-Jul-16 0.6 <1 <2 13 <1 0.31
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.12-Jul-16 0.83 <1 <2 13 <1 0.24
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.19-Jul-16 0.86 <1 <2 13 <1 0.24
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.26-Jul-16 0.94 <1 <2 15 <1 0.3
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.2-Aug-16 0.9 <1 <2 16 <1 0.24
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.9-Aug-16 0.88 <1 <2 16 <1 0.47
MPR-433 232 St.North of 130 Ave.16-Aug-16 0.83 <1 <2 16 <1 0.33
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.23-Aug-16 0.83 <1 <2 17 <1 0.26
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.30-Aug-16 1.08 <1 <2 17 <1 0.27
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.6-Sep-16 0.76 <1 <2 16 <1 0.26
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.13-Sep-16 0.69 <1 <2 16 <1 0.28
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.20-Sep-16 0.8 <1 <2 16 <1 0.23
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.27-Sep-16 0.98 <1 <2 15 <1 0.24
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
46
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.4-Oct-16 0.65 <1 2 15 <1 0.18
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.11-Oct-16 0.69 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.18-Oct-16 0.9 <1 <2 11 <1 0.41
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.25-Oct-16 0.58 <1 <2 12 <1 0.37
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.1-Nov-16 0.75 <1 <2 11 <1 0.48
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.8-Nov-16 0.99 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.15-Nov-16 0.77 <1 <2 10 <1 0.37
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.22-Nov-16 0.54 <1 <2 11 <1 0.32
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.29-Nov-16 0.3 <1 <2 9 <1 0.35
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.6-Dec-16 0.82 <1 <2 8 <1 0.52
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.13-Dec-16 0.75 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.20-Dec-16 0.63 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27
MPR-433 232 St. North of 130 Ave.28-Dec-16 0.57 <1 NA 6 <1 0.22
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.5-Jan-16 0.81 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.12-Jan-16 0.86 <1 <2 7 <1 0.29
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.19-Jan-16 0.77 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.26-Jan-16 0.66 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.2-Feb-16 0.74 <1 <2 7 <1 0.36
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.9-Feb-16 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.49
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.16-Feb-16 0.89 <1 <2 7 <1 0.49
MPR-434 102 Ave.East of 241A St.23-Feb-16 0.81 <1 <2 7 <1 0.35
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.1-Mar-16 0.75 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.8-Mar-16 0.6 <1 <2 8 <1 0.41
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.15-Mar-16 0.39 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.22-Mar-16 0.69 <1 <2 8 <1 0.3
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.29-Mar-16 0.48 <1 <2 8 <1 0.3
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.5-Apr-16 0.75 <1 <2 9 <1 0.45
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.12-Apr-16 0.63 <1 44 10 <1 0.35
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.19-Apr-16 0.68 <1 <2 12 <1 0.28
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.26-Apr-16 0.72 <1 <2 11 <1 0.34
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.4-May-16 0.67 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.10-May-16 0.66 <1 <2 13 <1 0.22
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.17-May-16 0.45 <1 <2 13 <1 0.29
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.24-May-16 0.63 <1 <2 13 <1 0.2
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.31-May-16 0.71 <1 <2 13 <1 0.29
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.7-Jun-16 0.47 <1 <2 16 <1 0.31
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.14-Jun-16 0.78 <1 <2 14 <1 0.27
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.21-Jun-16 0.75 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.28-Jun-16 0.92 <1 <2 15 <1 0.39
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
47
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.5-Jul-16 0.72 <1 2 15 <1 0.38
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.12-Jul-16 0.92 <1 2 15 <1 0.21
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.19-Jul-16 0.71 <1 <2 16 <1 0.32
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.26-Jul-16 0.88 <1 <2 16 <1 0.27
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.2-Aug-16 0.86 <1 <2 17 <1 0.27
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.9-Aug-16 0.83 <1 <2 18 <1 0.3
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.16-Aug-16 0.8 <1 <2 18 <1 0.33
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.23-Aug-16 0.8 <1 <2 19 <1 0.29
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.30-Aug-16 0.81 <1 <2 19 <1 0.29
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.6-Sep-16 0.71 <1 <2 17 <1 0.3
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.13-Sep-16 0.7 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.20-Sep-16 0.67 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.27-Sep-16 0.69 <1 <2 17 <1 0.29
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.4-Oct-16 0.66 <1 <2 16 <1 0.2
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.11-Oct-16 0.51 <1 <2 15 <1 0.2
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.18-Oct-16 0.4 <1 <2 14 <1 0.32
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.25-Oct-16 0.72 <1 <2 13 <1 0.4
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.1-Nov-16 0.53 <1 2 12 <1 0.42
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.8-Nov-16 0.6 <1 <2 12 <1 0.34
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.15-Nov-16 0.56 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.22-Nov-16 0.51 <1 <2 12 <1 0.32
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.29-Nov-16 0.5 <1 <2 11 <1 0.31
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.6-Dec-16 0.52 <1 <2 9 <1 0.42
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.13-Dec-16 0.71 <1 <2 7 <1 0.29
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.20-Dec-16 0.73 <1 <2 7 <1 0.29
MPR-434 102 Ave. East of 241A St.28-Dec-16 0.71 <1 NA 6 <1 0.23
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 5-Jan-16 0.53 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 12-Jan-16 0.46 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 19-Jan-16 0.52 <1 <2 6 <1 0.25
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 26-Jan-16 0.34 <1 <2 7 <1 0.28
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 2-Feb-16 0.51 <1 <2 7 <1 0.33
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 9-Feb-16 0.69 <1 <2 7 <1 0.57
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 16-Feb-16 0.43 <1 <2 7 <1 0.37
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 23-Feb-16 0.35 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 1-Mar-16 0.44 <1 <2 8 <1 0.29
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 8-Mar-16 0.74 <1 <2 8 <1 0.36
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 15-Mar-16 0.28 <1 <2 8 <1 0.25
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 22-Mar-16 0.44 <1 <2 8 <1 0.25
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 29-Mar-16 0.53 <1 <2 9 <1 0.27
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
48
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 5-Apr-16 0.32 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 12-Apr-16 0.29 <1 <2 11 <1 0.36
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 19-Apr-16 0.31 <1 <2 11 <1 0.24
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 26-Apr-16 0.37 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 3-May-16 0.56 <1 <2 11 <1 0.25
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 10-May-16 0.37 <1 2 13 <1 0.29
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 17-May-16 0.22 <1 <2 14 <1 0.27
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 24-May-16 0.54 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 31-May-16 0.49 <1 2 13 <1 0.3
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 7-Jun-16 0.45 <1 <2 14 <1 0.25
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 14-Jun-16 0.22 <1 <2 14 <1 0.26
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 21-Jun-16 0.2 <1 <2 14 <1 0.24
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 28-Jun-16 0.56 <1 <2 14 <1 0.38
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 5-Jul-16 0.38 <1 2 16 <1 0.26
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 12-Jul-16 0.51 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 19-Jul-16 0.27 <1 <2 16 <1 0.31
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 26-Jul-16 0.51 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 2-Aug-16 0.4 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 9-Aug-16 0.38 <1 <2 18 <1 0.26
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 16-Aug-16 0.44 <1 <2 17 <1 0.26
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 23-Aug-16 0.34 <1 <2 19 <1 0.26
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 30-Aug-16 0.36 <1 2 19 <1 0.27
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 6-Sep-16 0.2 <1 <2 18 <1 0.29
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 13-Sep-16 0.37 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 20-Sep-16 0.32 <1 <2 18 <1 0.22
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 27-Sep-16 0.26 <1 <2 17 <1 0.17
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 4-Oct-16 0.27 <1 <2 16 <1 0.19
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 11-Oct-16 0.19 <1 <2 15 <1 0.18
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 18-Oct-16 0.36 <1 2 14 <1 0.35
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 25-Oct-16 0.25 <1 <2 13 <1 0.33
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 1-Nov-16 0.27 <1 <2 13 <1 0.42
MPR-435 240 St.South of Abernethy Way 8-Nov-16 0.13 <1 <2 12 <1 0.44
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 15-Nov-16 0.14 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 22-Nov-16 0.21 <1 <2 10 <1 0.32
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 29-Nov-16 0.34 <1 <2 10 <1 0.32
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 6-Dec-16 0.12 <1 <2 9 <1 0.4
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 13-Dec-16 0.46 <1 <2 8 <1 0.27
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 20-Dec-16 0.58 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3
MPR-435 240 St. South of Abernethy Way 28-Dec-16 0.28 <1 NA 5 <1 0.23
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
49
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.5-Jan-16 1.2 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.12-Jan-16 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.19-Jan-16 1.4 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.26-Jan-16 0.89 <1 <2 7 <1 0.28
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.2-Feb-16 1.1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.35
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.9-Feb-16 1.2 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.16-Feb-16 1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.36
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.23-Feb-16 0.82 <1 <2 7 <1 0.46
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.1-Mar-16 1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.39
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.8-Mar-16 1 <1 6 8 <1 0.4
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.15-Mar-16 0.69 <1 <2 8 <1 0.27
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.22-Mar-16 0.85 <1 <2 8 <1 0.24
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.29-Mar-16 0.68 <1 2 10 <1 0.26
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.5-Apr-16 0.74 <1 <2 10 <1 0.35
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.12-Apr-16 0.78 <1 <2 11 <1 0.24
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.19-Apr-16 0.83 <1 <2 11 <1 0.24
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.26-Apr-16 0.43 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.3-May-16 0.95 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.10-May-16 0.69 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.17-May-16 0.74 <1 <2 13 <1 0.28
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.24-May-16 0.92 <1 <2 12 <1 0.2
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.31-May-16 0.98 <1 <2 13 <1 0.27
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.7-Jun-16 0.52 <1 <2 15 <1 0.25
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.14-Jun-16 0.69 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.21-Jun-16 0.46 <1 <2 15 <1 0.27
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.28-Jun-16 1.11 <1 <2 15 <1 0.39
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.5-Jul-16 0.63 <1 2 16 <1 0.4
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.12-Jul-16 0.82 <1 2 16 <1 0.19
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.19-Jul-16 0.8 <1 <2 16 <1 0.25
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.26-Jul-16 0.95 <1 <2 16 <1 0.2
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.2-Aug-16 1.19 <1 <2 17 <1 0.22
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.9-Aug-16 0.93 <1 <2 17 <1 0.44
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.16-Aug-16 1.19 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23
MPR-436 125 Ave.West of Ansell St.23-Aug-16 0.95 <1 <2 18 <1 0.2
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.30-Aug-16 0.8 <1 <2 18 <1 0.22
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.6-Sep-16 0.26 <1 <2 18 <1 0.21
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.13-Sep-16 0.95 <1 <2 17 <1 0.21
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.20-Sep-16 0.47 <1 <2 16 <1 0.17
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.27-Sep-16 0.26 <1 <2 17 <1 0.19
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
50
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.4-Oct-16 0.58 <1 <2 15 <1 0.21
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.11-Oct-16 0.46 <1 <2 14 <1 0.15
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.18-Oct-16 0.69 <1 <2 14 <1 0.19
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.25-Oct-16 0.12 <1 <2 12 <1 0.3
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.1-Nov-16 0.46 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.8-Nov-16 0 <1 4 11 <1 0.29
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.15-Nov-16 0 <1 4 12 <1 0.28
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.22-Nov-16 0 <1 2 11 <1 0.26
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.29-Nov-16 0.38 <1 <2 10 <1 0.32
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.6-Dec-16 0.86 <1 <2 9 <1 0.41
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.13-Dec-16 1.05 <1 <2 7 <1 0.26
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.20-Dec-16 0.59 <1 <2 6 <1 0.26
MPR-436 125 Ave. West of Ansell St.28-Dec-16 0.5 <1 NA 5 <1 0.2
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.5-Jan-16 1.3 <1 <2 5 <1 0.35
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.12-Jan-16 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.34
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.19-Jan-16 1.3 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.26-Jan-16 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.2-Feb-16 1.2 <1 <2 6 <1 0.47
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.9-Feb-16 1.3 <1 <2 7 <1 0.48
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.16-Feb-16 0.9 <1 4 7 <1 0.4
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.23-Feb-16 1.1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.37
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.1-Mar-16 1.2 <1 <2 7 <1 0.37
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.8-Mar-16 1.4 <1 <2 8 <1 0.34
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.15-Mar-16 0.76 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.22-Mar-16 1.1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.28
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.29-Mar-16 1.1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.54
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.5-Apr-16 0.87 <1 <2 9 <1 0.4
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.12-Apr-16 0.65 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.19-Apr-16 0.77 <1 <2 10 <1 0.24
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.26-Apr-16 0.88 <1 <2 10 <1 0.26
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.4-May-16 0.69 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.10-May-16 0.62 <1 2 12 <1 16
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.17-May-16 0.57 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.24-May-16 0.81 <1 <2 12 <1 0.24
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.31-May-16 0.88 <1 <2 13 <1 0.36
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.7-Jun-16 0.67 <1 <2 13 <1 0.35
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.14-Jun-16 0.99 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.21-Jun-16 0.86 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.28-Jun-16 1.05 <1 <2 13 <1 0.32
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
51
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.5-Jul-16 0.96 <1 4 14 <1 0.41
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.12-Jul-16 0.97 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.19-Jul-16 0.88 <1 <2 15 <1 0.33
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.26-Jul-16 0.94 <1 <2 16 <1 0.22
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.2-Aug-16 0.96 <1 <2 16 <1 0.25
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.9-Aug-16 0.9 <1 <2 16 <1 0.29
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.16-Aug-16 0.93 <1 <2 17 <1 0.27
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.23-Aug-16 0.83 <1 <2 17 <1 0.28
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.30-Aug-16 1.13 <1 <2 17 <1 0.28
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.6-Sep-16 0.85 <1 <2 16 <1 0.25
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.13-Sep-16 0.86 <1 <2 16 <1 0.25
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.20-Sep-16 0.83 <1 <2 16 <1 0.26
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.27-Sep-16 0.93 <1 2 15 <1 0.26
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.4-Oct-16 0.93 <1 <2 14 <1 0.18
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.11-Oct-16 0.42 <1 <2 14 <1 0.19
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.18-Oct-16 0.86 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.25-Oct-16 0.64 <1 <2 13 <1 0.34
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.1-Nov-16 0.53 <1 <2 12 <1 0.37
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.8-Nov-16 0.83 <1 <2 11 <1 0.39
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.15-Nov-16 0.16 <1 <2 11 <1 0.42
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.22-Nov-16 0.55 <1 <2 10 <1 0.33
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.29-Nov-16 1.08 <1 2 9 <1 0.37
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.6-Dec-16 1.09 <1 <2 9 <1 0.37
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.13-Dec-16 0.85 <1 <2 7 <1 0.24
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.20-Dec-16 0.95 <1 <2 6 <1 0.34
MPR-437 248 St. @ 116 Ave.28-Dec-16 1 <1 NA 5 <1 0.24
MPR-438 125 Ave.West off 256 St.5-Jan-16 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.12-Jan-16 1.2 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.19-Jan-16 1.3 <1 <2 6 <1 0.39
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.26-Jan-16 0.86 <1 <2 7 <1 0.29
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.2-Feb-16 1.2 <1 <2 7 <1 0.42
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.9-Feb-16 1.1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.51
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.16-Feb-16 0.95 <1 <2 7 <1 0.43
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.23-Feb-16 0.91 <1 <2 7 <1 0.39
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.1-Mar-16 0.95 <1 <2 7 <1 0.38
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.8-Mar-16 1.5 <1 <2 8 <1 0.35
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.15-Mar-16 0.67 <1 <2 7 <1 0.28
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.22-Mar-16 0.87 <1 <2 8 <1 0.32
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.29-Mar-16 0.84 <1 <2 8 <1 0.34
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
52
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.5-Apr-16 0.66 <1 <2 9 <1 0.31
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.12-Apr-16 0.91 <1 <2 10 <1 0.38
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.19-Apr-16 0.8 <1 <2 10 <1 0.25
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.26-Apr-16 0.88 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.4-May-16 0.67 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.10-May-16 0.81 <1 <2 12 <1 0.31
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.17-May-16 0.49 <1 <2 13 <1 0.29
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.24-May-16 0.89 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.31-May-16 0.79 <1 <2 12 <1 0.43
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.7-Jun-16 0.45 <1 <2 14 <1 0.33
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.14-Jun-16 0.74 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.21-Jun-16 0.8 <1 <2 13 <1 0.29
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.28-Jun-16 1.04 <1 <2 13 <1 0.33
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.5-Jul-16 0.75 <1 <2 14 <1 0.33
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.12-Jul-16 0.98 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.19-Jul-16 0.69 <1 <2 15 <1 0.19
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.26-Jul-16 0.99 <1 2 15 <1 0.24
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.2-Aug-16 0.97 <1 <2 16 <1 0.27
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.9-Aug-16 0.99 <1 <2 16 <1 0.33
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.16-Aug-16 0.68 <1 <2 17 <1 0.32
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.23-Aug-16 0.8 <1 <2 17 <1 0.27
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.30-Aug-16 1.11 <1 <2 17 <1 0.44
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.6-Sep-16 0.85 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.13-Sep-16 0.82 <1 <2 16 <1 0.23
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.20-Sep-16 0.68 <1 <2 16 <1 0.24
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.27-Sep-16 0.92 <1 <2 16 <1 0.2
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.4-Oct-16 1.03 <1 <2 16 <1 0.21
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.11-Oct-16 0.66 <1 <2 14 <1 0.18
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.18-Oct-16 0.78 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.25-Oct-16 0.52 <1 <2 13 <1 0.36
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.1-Nov-16 0.43 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.8-Nov-16 0.3 <1 <2 11 <1 0.32
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.15-Nov-16 0.27 <1 <2 11 <1 0.37
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.22-Nov-16 0.17 <1 2 12 <1 0.36
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.29-Nov-16 0.31 <1 <2 10 <1 0.35
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.6-Dec-16 0.55 <1 <2 10 <1 0.36
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.13-Dec-16 0.64 <1 4 7 <1 0.26
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.20-Dec-16 1.01 <1 <2 6 <1 0.35
MPR-438 125 Ave. West off 256 St.28-Dec-16 1.02 <1 NA 5 <1 0.24
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
53
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)5-Jan-16 0.91 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)12-Jan-16 0.79 <1 <2 5 <1 0.33
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)19-Jan-16 0.99 <1 <2 5 <1 0.29
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)26-Jan-16 0.85 <1 <2 6 <1 0.33
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)2-Feb-16 0.82 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St.(W. of 256 St.)9-Feb-16 1 <1 2 7 <1 0.4
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)16-Feb-16 0.92 <1 2 7 <1 0.53
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)23-Feb-16 0.76 <1 2 7 <1 0.33
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)1-Mar-16 0.57 <1 <2 7 <1 0.44
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)8-Mar-16 0.62 <1 <2 8 <1 0.37
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)15-Mar-16 0.68 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)22-Mar-16 0.59 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)29-Mar-16 0.9 <1 <2 9 <1 0.28
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)5-Apr-16 0.7 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)12-Apr-16 0.43 <1 <2 11 <1 0.37
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)19-Apr-16 0.6 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)26-Apr-16 0.49 <1 <2 12 <1 0.31
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)5-May-16 0.51 <1 2 13 <1 0.27
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)10-May-16 0.36 <1 <2 14 <1 0.46
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)17-May-16 0.68 <1 <2 15 <1 0.53
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)24-May-16 0.72 <1 <2 15 <1 0.25
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)31-May-16 0.82 <1 <2 15 <1 0.41
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)7-Jun-16 0.38 <1 <2 17 <1 0.4
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)14-Jun-16 0.37 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)21-Jun-16 0.42 <1 <2 16 <1 0.25
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)28-Jun-16 0.52 <1 <2 17 <1 0.29
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)5-Jul-16 0.2 <1 2 18 <1 0.25
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)12-Jul-16 0.4 <1 <2 18 <1 0.2
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)19-Jul-16 0.21 <1 <2 18 <1 0.19
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)26-Jul-16 0.38 <1 <2 19 <1 0.23
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)2-Aug-16 0.41 <1 <2 20 <1 0.21
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)9-Aug-16 0.25 <1 <2 19 <1 0.37
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)16-Aug-16 0.27 <1 <2 20 <1 0.29
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)23-Aug-16 0.26 <1 <2 20 <1 0.2
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)30-Aug-16 0.22 <1 2 19 <1 0.2
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)6-Sep-16 0.46 <1 <2 18 <1 0.19
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)13-Sep-16 0.27 <1 <2 17 <1 0.22
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)20-Sep-16 0.2 <1 2 16 <1 0.21
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)27-Sep-16 0.31 <1 <2 16 <1 0.25
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
54
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)4-Oct-16 0.02 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)11-Oct-16 0.12 <1 <2 14 <1 0.19
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)18-Oct-16 0.13 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)25-Oct-16 0.11 <1 <2 13 <1 0.34
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)1-Nov-16 0.09 <1 <2 12 <1 0.34
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)8-Nov-16 0 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)15-Nov-16 0.07 <1 <2 12 <1 0.3
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)22-Nov-16 0.09 <1 <2 12 <1 0.33
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)29-Nov-16 0.2 <1 <2 10 <1 0.4
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)6-Dec-16 0.03 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)13-Dec-16 0.28 <1 <2 7 <1 0.29
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)20-Dec-16 0.23 <1 <2 6 <1 0.34
MPR-439 130 Ave. @ 251A St. (W. of 256 St.)28-Dec-16 0.56 <1 NA 5 <1 0.34
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.5-Jan-16 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.34
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.12-Jan-16 0.87 <1 <2 6 <1 0.36
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.19-Jan-16 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.34
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.26-Jan-16 0.74 <1 2 6 <1 0.43
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.2-Feb-16 1.2 <1 <2 6 <1 0.4
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.9-Feb-16 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.49
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.16-Feb-16 1.1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.5
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.23-Feb-16 0.83 <1 <2 6 <1 0.37
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.1-Mar-16 0.92 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.8-Mar-16 1.2 <1 <2 7 <1 0.37
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.15-Mar-16 1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.38
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.22-Mar-16 0.94 <1 <2 8 <1 0.3
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.29-Mar-16 0.83 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.5-Apr-16 0.8 <1 <2 9 <1 0.31
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.12-Apr-16 0.88 <1 <2 9 <1 0.29
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.19-Apr-16 0.85 <1 <2 9 <1 0.98
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.26-Apr-16 0.81 <1 <2 9 <1 0.35
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.4-May-16 0.73 <1 2 11 <1 0.31
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.10-May-16 0.75 <1 <2 11 <1 0.31
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.17-May-16 0.57 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.24-May-16 0.81 <1 <2 12 <1 0.22
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.31-May-16 0.86 <1 2 12 <1 0.44
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.7-Jun-16 0.77 <1 <2 13 <1 0.32
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.14-Jun-16 0.83 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.21-Jun-16 0.9 <1 <2 13 <1 0.28
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.28-Jun-16 1.08 <1 <2 14 <1 0.39
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
55
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.5-Jul-16 0.86 <1 <2 14 <1 0.24
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.12-Jul-16 0.96 <1 2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.19-Jul-16 0.61 <1 <2 13 <1 0.38
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.26-Jul-16 1.08 <1 <2 15 <1 0.27
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.2-Aug-16 0.96 <1 8 16 <1 0.25
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.9-Aug-16 0.91 <1 <2 16 <1 0.45
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.16-Aug-16 0.94 <1 <2 17 <1 0.42
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.23-Aug-16 0.82 <1 2 17 <1 0.27
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.30-Aug-16 0.95 <1 <2 17 <1 0.39
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.6-Sep-16 0.68 <1 <2 16 <1 0.24
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.13-Sep-16 0.82 <1 2 16 <1 0.31
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.20-Sep-16 0.83 <1 <2 16 <1 0.26
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.27-Sep-16 0.97 <1 2 15 <1 0.32
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.4-Oct-16 0.89 <1 2 15 <1 0.25
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.11-Oct-16 0.82 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.18-Oct-16 0.75 <1 <2 12 <1 0.44
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.25-Oct-16 0.92 <1 <2 11 <1 0.42
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.1-Nov-16 0.85 <1 <2 11 <1 0.48
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.8-Nov-16 0.86 <1 <2 11 <1 0.31
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.15-Nov-16 0.72 <1 <2 10 <1 0.38
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.22-Nov-16 0.76 <1 <2 11 <1 0.4
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.29-Nov-16 0.58 <1 <2 9 <1 0.39
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.6-Dec-16 0.82 <1 <2 8 <1 1.1
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.13-Dec-16 0.95 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.20-Dec-16 0.81 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32
MPR-440 232 St. @ 117 Ave.28-Dec-16 0.91 <1 NA 6 <1 0.25
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 5-Jan-16 0.27 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 12-Jan-16 0.15 <1 <2 5 <1 0.25
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 19-Jan-16 0.28 <1 <2 5 <1 0.26
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 26-Jan-16 0.08 <1 2 7 <1 0.28
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 2-Feb-16 0.12 <1 <2 7 <1 0.36
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 9-Feb-16 0.07 <1 <2 6 <1 0.37
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 16-Feb-16 0.22 <1 <2 7 <1 0.39
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 23-Feb-16 0.09 <1 6 7 <1 0.3
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 1-Mar-16 0.16 <1 <2 8 <1 0.29
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 8-Mar-16 0.22 <1 <2 9 <1 0.33
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 15-Mar-16 0.08 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 22-Mar-16 0.19 <1 <2 9 <1 0.28
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 29-Mar-16 0.21 <1 <2 9 <1 0.25
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
56
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 5-Apr-16 0.17 <1 <2 11 <1 0.38
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 12-Apr-16 0.1 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 19-Apr-16 0.06 <1 <2 11 <1 0.24
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 26-Apr-16 0 <1 2 12 <1 0.25
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 3-May-16 0.09 <1 <2 14 <1 0.31
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 10-May-16 0.02 <1 2 15 <1 0.29
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 17-May-16 0.08 <1 <2 14 <1 0.22
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 24-May-16 0.08 <1 <2 15 <1 0.21
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 31-May-16 0.08 <1 <2 14 <1 0.33
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 7-Jun-16 0.07 <1 <2 15 <1 0.34
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 14-Jun-16 0 <1 <2 16 <1 0.28
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 21-Jun-16 0 <1 <2 15 <1 0.27
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 28-Jun-16 0.25 <1 <2 16 <1 0.37
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 5-Jul-16 0.03 <1 <2 18 <1 0.3
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 12-Jul-16 0.05 <1 <2 17 <1 0.2
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 19-Jul-16 0 <1 <2 18 <1 0.24
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 26-Jul-16 0.12 <1 2 18 <1 0.28
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 2-Aug-16 0.19 <1 <2 19 <1 0.22
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 9-Aug-16 0.11 <1 <2 18 <1 0.25
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 16-Aug-16 0.14 <1 2 19 <1 0.43
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 23-Aug-16 0.13 <1 <2 19 <1 0.41
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 30-Aug-16 0.16 <1 <2 19 <1 0.21
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 6-Sep-16 0 <1 2 18 <1 0.22
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 13-Sep-16 0.06 <1 2 17 <1 0.26
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 20-Sep-16 0.12 <1 <2 18 <1 0.24
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 27-Sep-16 0.08 <1 <2 17 <1 0.21
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 4-Oct-16 0.03 <1 <2 16 <1 0.2
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 11-Oct-16 0.01 <1 10 15 <1 0.19
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 18-Oct-16 0.18 <1 6 14 <1 0.31
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 25-Oct-16 0.09 <1 6 13 <1 0.31
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 1-Nov-16 0 <1 12 13 <1 0.35
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 8-Nov-16 0 <1 2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 15-Nov-16 0.01 <1 16 12 <1 0.33
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 22-Nov-16 0 <1 10 12 <1 0.33
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 29-Nov-16 0.17 <1 10 11 <1 0.28
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 6-Dec-16 0 <1 36 9 <1 0.33
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 13-Dec-16 0.21 <1 <2 7 <1 0.24
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 20-Dec-16 0.67 <1 <2 6 <1 0.27
MPR-441 132 Ave. @ Cedar Way 28-Dec-16 0.55 <1 NA 5 <1 0.21
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
57
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.5-Jan-16 0.37 <1 2 7 <1 0.28
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.12-Jan-16 0.53 <1 <2 7 <1 0.45
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.19-Jan-16 0.51 <1 <2 6 <1 0.36
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.26-Jan-16 0.44 <1 6 7 <1 0.34
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.2-Feb-16 0.73 <1 <2 7 <1 0.35
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.9-Feb-16 0.77 <1 <2 7 <1 0.52
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.16-Feb-16 0.62 <1 4 7 <1 0.43
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.23-Feb-16 0.57 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.1-Mar-16 0.55 <1 2 8 <1 0.31
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.8-Mar-16 0.74 <1 <2 8 <1 0.39
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.15-Mar-16 0.58 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.22-Mar-16 0.83 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.29-Mar-16 0.84 <1 <2 8 <1 0.25
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.5-Apr-16 0.7 <1 <2 9 <1 0.32
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.12-Apr-16 0.66 <1 <2 10 <1 0.37
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.19-Apr-16 0.73 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.26-Apr-16 0.63 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.3-May-16 0.72 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.10-May-16 0.6 <1 <2 12 <1 0.27
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.17-May-16 0.58 <1 <2 13 <1 0.24
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.24-May-16 0.59 <1 <2 13 <1 0.22
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.31-May-16 0.58 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.7-Jun-16 0.67 <1 4 14 <1 0.28
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.14-Jun-16 0.64 <1 <2 14 <1 0.28
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.21-Jun-16 0.67 <1 <2 14 <1 0.59
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.28-Jun-16 0.82 <1 <2 14 <1 0.46
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.5-Jul-16 0.7 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.12-Jul-16 0.74 <1 <2 15 <1 0.2
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.19-Jul-16 0.69 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.26-Jul-16 0.8 <1 <2 16 <1 0.23
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.2-Aug-16 0.73 <1 <2 17 <1 0.27
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.9-Aug-16 0.64 <1 <2 18 <1 0.3
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.16-Aug-16 0.72 <1 <2 18 <1 0.26
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.23-Aug-16 0.67 <1 <2 18 <1 0.26
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.30-Aug-16 0.7 <1 <2 18 <1 0.25
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.6-Sep-16 0.61 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.13-Sep-16 0.56 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.20-Sep-16 0.58 <1 <2 17 <1 0.28
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.27-Sep-16 0.62 <1 <2 17 <1 0.27
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
58
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.4-Oct-16 0.59 <1 <2 16 <1 0.26
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.11-Oct-16 0.45 <1 2 14 <1 0.29
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.18-Oct-16 0.57 <1 <2 13 <1 0.34
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.25-Oct-16 0.59 <1 <2 13 <1 0.37
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.1-Nov-16 0.46 <1 <2 12 <1 0.36
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.8-Nov-16 0.52 <1 <2 12 <1 0.28
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.15-Nov-16 0.46 <1 <2 11 <1 1.7
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.22-Nov-16 0.46 <1 <2 11 <1 0.31
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.29-Nov-16 0.45 <1 <2 1 <1 0.37
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.6-Dec-16 0.38 <1 <2 10 <1 0.34
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.13-Dec-16 0.63 <1 <2 7 <1 0.27
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.20-Dec-16 0.51 <1 <2 6 <1 0.4
MPR-442 Princess St. @ Ditton St.28-Dec-16 0.57 <1 NA 6 <1 0.22
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 5-Jan-16 0.62 <1 <2 6 <1 0.39
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 12-Jan-16 0.52 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 19-Jan-16 0.59 <1 2 6 <1 0.33
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 26-Jan-16 0.69 <1 <2 7 <1 0.33
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 2-Feb-16 0.99 <1 4 6 <1 0.5
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 9-Feb-16 0.95 <1 <2 7 <1 0.47
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 16-Feb-16 0.59 <1 <2 7 <1 0.43
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 23-Feb-16 0.87 <1 <2 7 <1 0.33
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 1-Mar-16 0.82 <1 4 7 <1 0.29
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 8-Mar-16 1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.35
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 15-Mar-16 0.75 <1 <2 7 <1 0.31
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 22-Mar-16 0.82 <1 <2 8 <1 0.28
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 29-Mar-16 0.76 <1 <2 8 <1 0.25
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 5-Apr-16 0.88 <1 <2 9 <1 0.25
MPR-443 216 St.@ Donovan 12-Apr-16 0.83 <1 <2 9 <1 0.31
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 19-Apr-16 0.78 <1 <2 10 <1 0.56
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 26-Apr-16 0.82 <1 <2 9 <1 0.26
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 4-May-16 0.83 <1 16 11 <1 0.4
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 10-May-16 0.78 <1 2 12 <1 0.29
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 17-May-16 0.87 <1 <2 11 <1 0.3
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 24-May-16 0.89 <1 <2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 31-May-16 0.75 <1 <2 12 <1 0.37
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 7-Jun-16 0.63 <1 <2 12 <1 0.34
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 14-Jun-16 0.75 <1 <2 14 <1 0.26
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 21-Jun-16 0.48 <1 <2 14 <1 0.26
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 28-Jun-16 1.05 <1 <2 13 <1 0.43
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
59
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 5-Jul-16 0.7 <1 2 16 <1 0.24
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 12-Jul-16 0.64 <1 <2 16 <1 0.2
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 19-Jul-16 0.42 <1 <2 16 <1 0.27
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 26-Jul-16 0.85 <1 <2 17 <1 0.26
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 2-Aug-16 0.83 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 9-Aug-16 0.78 <1 <2 18 <1 0.37
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 16-Aug-16 0.98 <1 <2 17 <1 0.27
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 23-Aug-16 1.01 <1 <2 18 <1 0.29
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 30-Aug-16 0.88 <1 <2 18 <1 0.24
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 6-Sep-16 0.65 <1 4 17 <1 0.24
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 13-Sep-16 0.73 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 20-Sep-16 0.68 <1 <2 17 <1 0.29
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 27-Sep-16 0.73 <1 <2 16 <1 0.2
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 4-Oct-16 0.75 <1 <2 15 <1 0.2
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 11-Oct-16 0.59 <1 <2 14 <1 0.21
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 18-Oct-16 0.82 <1 2 13 <1 0.38
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 25-Oct-16 0.88 <1 <2 12 <1 0.34
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 1-Nov-16 0.62 <1 <2 12 <1 0.37
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 8-Nov-16 0.64 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 15-Nov-16 0.65 <1 <2 11 <1 0.36
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 22-Nov-16 0.59 <1 2 10 <1 0.32
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 29-Nov-16 0.65 <1 <2 9 <1 0.48
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 6-Dec-16 0.52 <1 <2 9 <1 0.41
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 13-Dec-16 0.85 <1 <2 6 <1 0.3
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 20-Dec-16 0.92 <1 2 6 <1 0.37
MPR-443 216 St. @ Donovan 28-Dec-16 0.83 <1 NA 5 <1 0.22
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.5-Jan-16 0.44 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.12-Jan-16 0.51 <1 <2 5 <1 0.3
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.19-Jan-16 0.61 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.26-Jan-16 0.44 <1 <2 6 <1 0.36
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.2-Feb-16 0.72 <1 2 6 <1 0.43
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.9-Feb-16 0.86 <1 <2 6 <1 0.39
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.16-Feb-16 0.42 <1 <2 7 <1 0.36
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.23-Feb-16 0.48 <1 <2 7 <1 0.36
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.1-Mar-16 0.53 <1 <2 7 <1 0.29
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.8-Mar-16 0.73 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.15-Mar-16 0.45 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.22-Mar-16 0.53 <1 <2 8 <1 0.28
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.29-Mar-16 0.54 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
60
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.5-Apr-16 0.48 <1 <2 9 <1 0.29
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.12-Apr-16 0.43 <1 <2 10 <1 0.32
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.19-Apr-16 0.54 <1 4 10 <1 0.3
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.26-Apr-16 0.51 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.4-May-16 0.29 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.10-May-16 0.37 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.17-May-16 0.25 <1 <2 13 <1 0.25
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.24-May-16 0.51 <1 <2 13 <1 0.21
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.31-May-16 0.4 <1 <2 13 <1 0.34
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.7-Jun-16 0.47 <1 6 14 <1 0.49
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.14-Jun-16 0.43 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.21-Jun-16 0.46 <1 <2 13 <1 0.28
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.28-Jun-16 0.58 <1 <2 14 <1 0.47
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.5-Jul-16 0.5 <1 <2 15 <1 0.24
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.12-Jul-16 0.49 <1 2 15 <1 0.2
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.19-Jul-16 0.53 <1 <2 15 <1 0.37
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.26-Jul-16 0.5 <1 2 16 <1 0.24
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.2-Aug-16 0.63 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.9-Aug-16 0.49 <1 <2 17 <1 0.32
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.16-Aug-16 0.52 <1 <2 18 <1 0.43
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.23-Aug-16 0.29 <1 <2 17 <1 0.33
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.30-Aug-16 0.42 <1 <2 18 <1 0.27
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.6-Sep-16 0.36 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.13-Sep-16 0.34 <1 <2 16 <1 0.21
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.20-Sep-16 0.36 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.27-Sep-16 0.35 <1 <2 16 <1 0.2
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.4-Oct-16 0.37 <1 <2 15 <1 0.27
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.11-Oct-16 0.17 <1 <2 14 <1 0.2
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.18-Oct-16 0.41 <1 <2 13 <1 0.22
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.25-Oct-16 0.32 <1 <2 12 <1 0.32
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.1-Nov-16 0.23 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.8-Nov-16 0.21 <1 <2 12 <1 0.32
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.15-Nov-16 0.26 <1 <2 11 <1 0.44
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.22-Nov-16 0.32 <1 <2 11 <1 0.31
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.29-Nov-16 0.34 <1 <2 10 <1 0.31
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.6-Dec-16 0.03 <1 <2 9 <1 0.37
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.13-Dec-16 0.5 <1 <2 7 <1 0.26
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.20-Dec-16 0.34 <1 4 6 <1 0.35
MPR-444 Foreman Drive @ 232nd St.28-Dec-16 0.32 <1 NA 5 <1 0.22
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
61
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.5-Jan-16 0.64 <1 <2 7 <1 0.26
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.12-Jan-16 0.9 <1 <2 6 <1 0.25
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.19-Jan-16 0.59 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31
MPR-445 127th Ave.and 266 St.26-Jan-16 0.86 <1 <2 7 <1 0.3
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.2-Feb-16 0.71 <1 <2 7 <1 0.31
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.9-Feb-16 1.1 <1 <2 7 <1 0.36
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.16-Feb-16 0.89 <1 <2 7 <1 0.39
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.23-Feb-16 0.58 <1 <2 7 <1 0.36
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.1-Mar-16 0.58 <1 <2 8 <1 0.35
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.8-Mar-16 0.66 <1 <2 8 <1 0.35
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.15-Mar-16 0.51 <1 <2 8 <1 0.32
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.22-Mar-16 0.57 <1 <2 8 <1 0.26
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.29-Mar-16 0.83 <1 <2 8 <1 0.26
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.5-Apr-16 0.73 <1 <2 10 <1 0.31
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.12-Apr-16 0.72 <1 <2 11 <1 0.28
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.19-Apr-16 0.78 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.26-Apr-16 0.05 <1 2 12 <1 0.24
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.3-May-16 0.76 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.10-May-16 0.71 <1 <2 14 <1 0.32
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.17-May-16 0.36 <1 2 14 <1 0.25
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.24-May-16 0.27 <1 <2 14 <1 0.21
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.31-May-16 0.6 <1 <2 15 <1 0.39
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.7-Jun-16 0.62 <1 4 15 <1 0.29
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.14-Jun-16 0.33 <1 <2 16 <1 0.26
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.21-Jun-16 0.72 <1 Cont.15 <1 0.24
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.28-Jun-16 0.94 <1 <2 17 <1 0.3
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.5-Jul-16 0.32 <1 <2 17 <1 0.27
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.12-Jul-16 0.64 <1 <2 17 <1 0.21
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.19-Jul-16 0.21 <1 <2 17 <1 0.23
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.26-Jul-16 0.78 <1 <2 17 <1 0.26
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.2-Aug-16 0.64 <1 <2 18 <1 0.2
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.9-Aug-16 0.69 <1 <2 19 <1 0.2
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.16-Aug-16 0.68 <1 <2 18 <1 0.26
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.23-Aug-16 0.81 <1 <2 19 <1 0.23
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.30-Aug-16 0.62 <1 <2 19 <1 0.28
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.6-Sep-16 0.23 <1 2 18 <1 0.21
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.13-Sep-16 0.7 <1 <2 18 <1 0.24
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.20-Sep-16 0.39 <1 <2 17 <1 0.28
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.27-Sep-16 0.47 <1 <2 17 <1 0.22
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
62
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.4-Oct-16 0.35 <1 <2 16 <1 0.28
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.11-Oct-16 0.13 <1 <2 15 <1 0.19
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.18-Oct-16 0.22 <1 <2 14 <1 0.24
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.25-Oct-16 0.09 <1 6 13 <1 0.34
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.1-Nov-16 0.17 <1 <2 13 <1 0.3
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.8-Nov-16 0.02 <1 <2 12 <1 0.34
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.15-Nov-16 0.32 <1 2 12 <1 0.33
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.22-Nov-16 0.03 <1 2 10 <1 0.29
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.29-Nov-16 0.2 <1 2 10 <1 0.35
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.6-Dec-16 0.03 <1 <2 10 <1 0.41
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.13-Dec-16 0.62 <1 8 8 <1 0.25
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.20-Dec-16 0.91 <1 2 7 <1 0.33
MPR-445 127th Ave. and 266 St.28-Dec-16 1.07 <1 NA 6 <1 0.24
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 5-Jan-16 1 <1 <2 6 <1 0.35
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 12-Jan-16 1 <1 <2 5 <1 0.51
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 19-Jan-16 1.2 <1 <2 6 <1 0.4
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 26-Jan-16 0.97 <1 <2 6 <1 0.52
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 2-Feb-16 1.7 <1 <2 6 <1 0.32
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 9-Feb-16 1.2 <1 <2 7 <1 0.42
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 16-Feb-16 0.93 <1 <2 7 <1 0.42
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 23-Feb-16 0.78 <1 <2 7 <1 0.38
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 1-Mar-16 0.79 <1 <2 8 <1 0.54
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 8-Mar-16 0.6 <1 <2 8 <1 0.48
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 15-Mar-16 0.64 <1 <2 8 <1 0.35
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 22-Mar-16 0.57 <1 <2 7 <1 0.38
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 29-Mar-16 0.91 <1 <2 8 <1 0.38
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 5-Apr-16 0.51 <1 <2 9 <1 0.28
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 12-Apr-16 0.48 <1 <2 9 <1 0.45
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 19-Apr-16 0.89 <1 <2 10 <1 0.35
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 26-Apr-16 0.61 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 3-May-16 0.61 <1 <2 11 <1 0.29
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 10-May-16 0.68 <1 <2 12 <1 1.2
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 17-May-16 0.44 <1 <2 13 <1 0.29
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 24-May-16 0.37 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 31-May-16 0.37 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 7-Jun-16 0.63 <1 <2 15 <1 0.44
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 14-Jun-16 0.19 <1 <2 13 <1 0.33
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 21-Jun-16 0.8 <1 <2 13 <1 0.28
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 28-Jun-16 0.16 <1 <2 15 <1 0.42
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
63
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 5-Jul-16 0.05 <1 <2 15 <1 0.32
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 12-Jul-16 0.07 <1 18 15 <1 0.29
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 19-Jul-16 0.02 <1 <2 15 <1 0.27
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 26-Jul-16 1.18 <1 <2 16 <1 0.23
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 2-Aug-16 0.32 <1 <2 16 <1 0.27
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 9-Aug-16 0.14 <1 <2 16 <1 0.39
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 16-Aug-16 1.05 <1 <2 17 <1 0.31
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 23-Aug-16 0.83 <1 2 17 <1 0.38
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 30-Aug-16 0.51 <1 <2 18 <1 0.25
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 6-Sep-16 0.56 <1 <2 16 <1 0.22
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 13-Sep-16 0.28 <1 <2 15 <1 0.27
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 20-Sep-16 0.81 <1 <2 16 <1 0.29
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 27-Sep-16 0.29 <1 <2 15 <1 0.33
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 4-Oct-16 0.38 <1 <2 14 <1 0.29
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 11-Oct-16 0.36 <1 <2 13 <1 0.24
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 18-Oct-16 0.29 <1 <2 12 <1 0.25
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 25-Oct-16 0.48 <1 <2 12 <1 0.38
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 1-Nov-16 0.22 <1 <2 11 <1 0.66
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 8-Nov-16 0.11 <1 <2 11 <1 0.37
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 15-Nov-16 0.62 <1 <2 11 <1 0.38
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 22-Nov-16 0.2 <1 4 10 <1 0.45
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 29-Nov-16 0.66 <1 <2 9 <1 0.39
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 6-Dec-16 0.26 <1 <2 9 <1 0.39
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 13-Dec-16 0.49 <1 <2 7 <1 0.78
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 20-Dec-16 0.74 <1 <2 6 <1 0.4
MPR-446 128th Ave and Willow Place 28-Dec-16 0.98 <1 NA 6 <1 0.29
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.5-Jan-16 0.34 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.12-Jan-16 0.51 <1 <2 6 <1 0.29
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.19-Jan-16 0.58 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.26-Jan-16 0.54 <1 <2 7 <1 0.31
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.2-Feb-16 0.96 <1 2 7 <1 0.39
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.9-Feb-16 0.91 <1 <2 7 <1 0.47
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.16-Feb-16 0.72 <1 <2 7 <1 0.47
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.23-Feb-16 0.72 <1 <2 7 <1 0.48
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.1-Mar-16 0.66 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.8-Mar-16 1 <1 <2 8 <1 0.33
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.15-Mar-16 0.77 <1 16 8 <1 0.77
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.22-Mar-16 0.83 <1 <2 8 <1 0.28
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.29-Mar-16 0.84 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
64
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.5-Apr-16 0.71 <1 <2 10 <1 0.28
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.12-Apr-16 0.76 <1 <2 10 <1 0.47
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.19-Apr-16 0.79 <1 <2 10 <1 0.5
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.26-Apr-16 0.68 <1 <2 10 <1 0.3
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.3-May-16 0.66 <1 <2 12 <1 0.26
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.10-May-16 0.56 <1 <2 13 <1 0.3
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.17-May-16 0.46 <1 <2 13 <1 0.26
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.24-May-16 0.69 <1 6 14 <1 0.28
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.31-May-16 0.8 <1 <2 13 <1 0.31
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.7-Jun-16 0.63 <1 <2 15 <1 0.34
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.14-Jun-16 0.7 <1 <2 15 <1 0.22
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.21-Jun-16 0.74 <1 <2 14 <1 0.23
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.28-Jun-16 0.83 <1 <2 15 <1 0.29
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.5-Jul-16 0.76 <1 2 16 <1 0.24
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.12-Jul-16 0.85 <1 <2 16 <1 0.2
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.19-Jul-16 0.67 <1 2 16 <1 0.51
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.26-Jul-16 0.8 <1 <2 18 <1 0.24
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.2-Aug-16 0.82 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.9-Aug-16 0.7 <1 2 18 <1 0.31
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.16-Aug-16 0.93 <1 2 18 <1 0.5
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.23-Aug-16 0.88 <1 2 19 <1 0.28
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.30-Aug-16 0.92 <1 <2 19 <1 0.21
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.6-Sep-16 0.83 <1 <2 17 <1 0.26
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.13-Sep-16 0.81 <1 2 17 <1 0.27
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.20-Sep-16 0.68 <1 2 17 <1 0.27
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.27-Sep-16 0.86 <1 2 17 <1 0.16
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.4-Oct-16 0.76 <1 <2 15 <1 0.17
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.11-Oct-16 0.44 <1 <2 15 <1 0.17
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.18-Oct-16 0.67 <1 <2 13 <1 0.34
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.25-Oct-16 0.73 <1 <2 13 <1 0.31
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.1-Nov-16 0.57 <1 <2 12 <1 0.34
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.8-Nov-16 0.45 <1 <2 12 <1 0.29
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.15-Nov-16 0.66 <1 <2 11 <1 0.6
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.22-Nov-16 0.68 <1 <2 11 <1 0.33
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.29-Nov-16 0.52 <1 2 10 <1 0.32
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.6-Dec-16 0.13 <1 <2 11 <1 0.47
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.13-Dec-16 0.75 <1 <2 7 <1 0.34
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.20-Dec-16 0.82 <1 <2 6 <1 0.47
MPR-447 117 Ave. @ 210 St.28-Dec-16 0.72 <1 NA 6 <1 0.23
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
65
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 5-Jan-16 0.56 <1 <2 6 <1 0.28
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 12-Jan-16 0.79 <1 <2 6 <1 0.31
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 19-Jan-16 0.93 <1 2 6 <1 0.35
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 26-Jan-16 0.55 <1 <2 7 <1 0.33
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 2-Feb-16 0.75 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 9-Feb-16 1.4 <1 <2 7 <1 0.5
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 16-Feb-16 0.85 <1 <2 7 <1 0.42
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 23-Feb-16 0.42 <1 <2 7 <1 0.4
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 1-Mar-16 0.55 <1 <2 8 <1 0.43
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 8-Mar-16 0.72 <1 <2 8 <1 0.4
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 15-Mar-16 0.55 <1 <2 8 <1 0.28
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 22-Mar-16 0.85 <1 <2 8 <1 0.3
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 29-Mar-16 0.65 <1 <2 8 <1 0.32
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 5-Apr-16 0.85 <1 <2 10 <1 0.35
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 12-Apr-16 0.54 <1 <2 10 <1 0.46
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 19-Apr-16 0.65 <1 <2 11 <1 0.26
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 26-Apr-16 0.55 <1 <2 11 <1 0.27
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 3-May-16 0.56 <1 <2 12 <1 0.23
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 10-May-16 0.49 <1 <2 14 <1 0.33
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 17-May-16 0.46 <1 <2 14 <1 0.3
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 24-May-16 0.74 <1 <2 14 <1 0.25
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 31-May-16 0.58 <1 <2 14 <1 0.3
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 7-Jun-16 0.43 <1 2 15 <1 0.39
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 14-Jun-16 0.52 <1 <2 15 <1 0.3
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 21-Jun-16 0.45 <1 <2 14 <1 0.37
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 28-Jun-16 0.74 <1 <2 16 <1 0.38
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 5-Jul-16 0.95 <1 2 16 <1 0.48
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 12-Jul-16 0.88 <1 <2 16 <1 0.2
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 19-Jul-16 0.63 <1 <2 16 <1 0.31
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 26-Jul-16 0.62 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 2-Aug-16 0.54 <1 <2 18 <1 0.26
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 9-Aug-16 0.74 <1 <2 18 <1 0.34
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 16-Aug-16 0.53 <1 2 19 <1 0.23
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 23-Aug-16 0.5 <1 2 19 <1 0.37
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 30-Aug-16 0.34 <1 2 19 <1 0.3
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 6-Sep-16 0.52 <1 <2 18 <1 0.2
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 13-Sep-16 0.51 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 20-Sep-16 0.48 <1 <2 17 <1 0.24
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 27-Sep-16 0.48 <1 <2 17 <1 0.19
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
66
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 4-Oct-16 0.54 <1 <2 16 <1 0.31
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 11-Oct-16 0.4 <1 <2 15 <1 0.22
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 18-Oct-16 0.49 <1 <2 14 <1 0.2
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 25-Oct-16 0.82 <1 2 13 <1 0.4
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 1-Nov-16 0.34 <1 <2 12 <1 0.47
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 8-Nov-16 0.48 <1 <2 12 <1 0.35
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 15-Nov-16 0.33 <1 <2 12 <1 0.36
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 22-Nov-16 0.64 <1 <2 12 <1 0.36
MPR-448 248th St. &McClure 29-Nov-16 0.38 <1 <2 10 <1 0.31
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 6-Dec-16 0.29 <1 <2 9 <1 0.47
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 13-Dec-16 0.45 <1 <2 7 <1 0.32
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 20-Dec-16 0.49 <1 <2 6 <1 0.35
MPR-448 248th St. & McClure 28-Dec-16 0.35 <1 NA 5 <1 0.23
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 5-Jan-16 0.07 <1 8 8 <1 0.27
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 12-Jan-16 0.06 <1 <2 7 <1 0.31
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 19-Jan-16 0.09 <1 <2 7 <1 0.28
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 26-Jan-16 0.14 <1 <2 8 <1 0.28
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 2-Feb-16 0.35 <1 <2 8 <1 0.36
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 9-Feb-16 0.17 <1 <2 8 <1 0.4
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 16-Feb-16 0.16 <1 <2 8 <1 0.36
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 23-Feb-16 0.26 <1 <2 8 <1 0.31
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 1-Mar-16 0.16 <1 <2 8 <1 0.26
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 8-Mar-16 0.28 <1 <2 9 <1 0.29
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 15-Mar-16 0.17 <1 <2 9 <1 0.24
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 22-Mar-16 0.22 <1 <2 10 <1 0.26
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 29-Mar-16 0.24 <1 <2 9 <1 0.23
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 5-Apr-16 0.14 <1 <2 11 <1 0.32
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 12-Apr-16 0.16 <1 <2 13 <1 0.27
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 19-Apr-16 0.23 <1 2 13 <1 0.22
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 26-Apr-16 0.18 <1 <2 13 <1 0.23
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 3-May-16 0.17 <1 <2 15 <1 0.27
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 10-May-16 0.12 <1 <2 15 <1 0.23
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 17-May-16 0.18 <1 <2 14 <1 0.21
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 24-May-16 0.2 <1 <2 15 <1 0.21
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 31-May-16 0.3 <1 <2 16 <1 0.3
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 7-Jun-16 0.21 <1 2 17 <1 0.25
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 14-Jun-16 0.15 <1 6 17 <1 0.21
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 21-Jun-16 0.16 <1 6 16 <1 0.23
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 28-Jun-16 0.25 <1 6 17 <1 0.29
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
67
Sample
Name Sample Reported Name Sampled
Date
Cl2
Free
mg/L
E. coli
MF/
100mL
HPC
CFU
/mL
Temp
°C
Total
Coliform
MF/100
mL
Turb.
NTU
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 5-Jul-16 0.3 <1 <2 17 <1 0.21
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 12-Jul-16 0.27 <1 <2 18 <1 0.19
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 19-Jul-16 0.24 <1 8 18 <1 0.38
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 26-Jul-16 0.3 <1 <2 19 <1 0.25
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 2-Aug-16 0.27 <1 2 20 <1 0.23
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 9-Aug-16 0.24 <1 4 19 <1 0.29
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 16-Aug-16 0.63 <1 6 19 <1 0.25
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 23-Aug-16 0.54 <1 4 19 <1 0.27
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 30-Aug-16 0.15 <1 4 18 <1 0.27
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 6-Sep-16 0.22 <1 10 17 <1 0.24
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 13-Sep-16 0.2 <1 12 19 <1 0.23
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 20-Sep-16 0.2 <1 14 19 <1 0.25
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 27-Sep-16 0.24 <1 4 18 <1 0.24
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 4-Oct-16 0.26 <1 <2 17 <1 0.21
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 11-Oct-16 0.14 <1 6 16 <1 0.17
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 18-Oct-16 0.2 <1 8 15 <1 0.28
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 25-Oct-16 0.22 <1 4 14 <1 0.28
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 1-Nov-16 0.13 <1 <2 14 <1 0.29
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 8-Nov-16 0.09 <1 2 13 <1 0.26
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 15-Nov-16 0.08 <1 <2 13 <1 0.31
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 22-Nov-16 0.1 <1 4 13 <1 0.29
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 29-Nov-16 0.18 <1 4 12 <1 0.24
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 6-Dec-16 0.06 <1 <2 10 <1 0.35
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 13-Dec-16 0.39 <1 <2 8 <1 0.26
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 20-Dec-16 0.01 <1 <2 8 <1 0.25
MPR-449 Meadow Brook North of Douglas 28-Dec-16 0.02 <1 NA 6 <1 0.19
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
68
Appendix H: Preventing Water-Borne Infections for People with Weakened Immune Systems
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
69
City of Maple Ridge
Drinking Water Quality Report 2016
70
CityCityCityCity of Maple Ridgeof Maple Ridgeof Maple Ridgeof Maple Ridge
TO:TO:TO:TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING MEETING MEETING MEETING DATEDATEDATEDATE:::: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council
FROM:FROM:FROM:FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: MEETING: MEETING: MEETING: Council
SUBJECTSUBJECTSUBJECTSUBJECT: Disbursements for the month ended April 30, 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The disbursements summary for the past period is attached for information. All voucher payments are
approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor and a Finance Manager. Council authorizes the
disbursements listing through Council resolution. Expenditure details are available by request through
the Finance Department.
RECOMMENDATION:RECOMMENDATION:RECOMMENDATION:RECOMMENDATION:
That the That the That the That the disbursements as listed below for the month ended disbursements as listed below for the month ended disbursements as listed below for the month ended disbursements as listed below for the month ended April 30April 30April 30April 30, 2017, 2017, 2017, 2017 bebebebe received for received for received for received for
information only.information only.information only.information only.
GENERALGENERALGENERALGENERAL $$$$ 7,885,2977,885,2977,885,2977,885,297
PAPAPAPAYROLLYROLLYROLLYROLL $$$$ 1,734,1101,734,1101,734,1101,734,110
PURCHASE CARDPURCHASE CARDPURCHASE CARDPURCHASE CARD $$$$ 79,20279,20279,20279,202
$$$$ 9,698,6099,698,6099,698,6099,698,609
DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:
a)a)a)a) Background Context:Background Context:Background Context:Background Context:
The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and
provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services.
The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan.
b)b)b)b) Community Communications:Community Communications:Community Communications:Community Communications:
The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial
disbursements.
702.2
c)c)c)c) Business Plan / Financial Implications:Business Plan / Financial Implications:Business Plan / Financial Implications:Business Plan / Financial Implications:
Highlights of larger items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution
• Emergency Communications – Dispatch levy – 2nd quarter $ 262,710
• G.V. Water District – water consumption Jan. 1 - 31/17 $ 550,805
• G.V. Regional District – debt payment $ 2,454,101
• Ridge Meadows Recycling Society – monthly contract for recycling $ 203,709
d)d)d)d) Policy Implications:Policy Implications:Policy Implications:Policy Implications:
Corporate governance practice includes reporting the disbursements to Council monthly.
CONCLUSIONS:CONCLUSIONS:CONCLUSIONS:CONCLUSIONS:
The disbursements for the month ended April 30, 2017 have been reviewed and are in order.
Original signed by G’Ann Rygg
______________________________________________
Prepared by: G’Ann RyggG’Ann RyggG’Ann RyggG’Ann Rygg
Accounting Clerk IIAccounting Clerk IIAccounting Clerk IIAccounting Clerk II
Original signed by Trevor Thompson
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Trevor Trevor Trevor Trevor Thompson, Thompson, Thompson, Thompson, BBA, BBA, BBA, BBA, CPA, CPA, CPA, CPA, CGACGACGACGA
Manager of FinancialManager of FinancialManager of FinancialManager of Financial PlanningPlanningPlanningPlanning
Original signed by Paul Gill
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, Paul Gill, BBA, Paul Gill, BBA, Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CPA, CPA, CPA, CGACGACGACGA
GM GM GM GM –––– Corporate & Financial ServicesCorporate & Financial ServicesCorporate & Financial ServicesCorporate & Financial Services
Original signed by E.C. Swabey
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. SwabeyE.C. SwabeyE.C. SwabeyE.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative OfficerChief Administrative OfficerChief Administrative OfficerChief Administrative Officer
VENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNT
Action Data Communications Telephone system upgrade 34,480
BC Hydro Electricity 145,281
BC Institute Of Technology Employee courses 19,001
BC SPCA Contract payment - Mar 29,190
CUPE Local 622 Dues - pay periods 17/07 & 17/08 25,985
Centra Construction Ltd Security refund 25,000
Chevron Canada Ltd Gasoline & diesel fuel 58,057
Christie Lites Lights for City Hall & Horse Clock 24,741
Cobing Building Solutions Electrical/Mechanical Maintenance:
Artist's residence 291
City Hall 384
Firehalls 1,901
Greg Moore Youth Centre 349
Heritage sites 596
Leisure Centre 11,188
Operations 1,256
Randy Herman Building 1,575
Whonnock Lake Community Centre 4,244 21,784
Ecotainer Sales Inc Recycling containers 74,517
Emergency Communications Dispatch levy - 2nd quarter 262,710
Epic Homes (2012) J.V.Security refund 79,169
ESRI Canada Limited Small local government enterprise licence agreement 67,200
Family Education & Support Ctr Community network coordination 30,000
Fitness Edge Contracted service provider - fitness classes & programs 19,323
Fortis BC Energy Inc Service alterations along 128 Ave 134,845
FortisBC - Natural Gas Natural gas 19,304
Gotraffic Management Inc Traffic control 19,437
Greater Vanc Water District Water consumption Jan 1-31/17 550,805
Greater Vancouver Regional Dis Debt payment 2,454,101
Guild Yule & Company LLP Professional fees 33,616
Guillevin International Inc Firefighter equipment 5,011
Firefighter protective wear 9,151
Firefighter turnout gear 3,420
Operations electrical supplies 1,895
Works yard inventory 4,474 23,951
Hallmark Facility Services Inc Janitorial services & supplies:
City Hall 3,496
Firehalls 4,643
Library 4,370
Operations 4,151
Randy Herman Building 4,336
RCMP 4,151 25,147
Industra Construction Corp McNutt Road reservoir expansion 62,956
Intelligo Networks Inc Juniper network support & maintenance renewal 51,779
Lafarge Canada Inc Roadworks material 18,879
Manulife Financial Employer/employee remittance 150,754
Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council Arts Centre contract payment 54,167
Program revenue Mar 32,290 86,457
Maridge Properties Ltd Security refund 30,000
Medical Services Plan Employee medical & health premiums 40,950
Municipal Pension Plan BC Employer/employee remittance 462,771
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGECITY OF MAPLE RIDGECITY OF MAPLE RIDGECITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - APRIL 2017MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - APRIL 2017MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - APRIL 2017MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - APRIL 2017
VENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNT
Noble British Columbia Plumbing/Heating maintenance supplies:
Caretaker house 248
Curling Rink 9,825
Fairgrounds 938
Firehalls 15
Greg Moore Youth Centre 16
Leisure Centre 11
Municipal parks 2,584
Operations 96
RCMP 1,042
Whonnock Lake Community Centre 854 15,629
Nova Pole Int'L Inc Street light poles & supplies 20,364
Nustadia Recreation Inc Subsidized ice purchased by P&LS on behalf of user groups 149,994
Open Storage Solutions Inc Maintenance contract 38,324
Data storage upgrade 57,309 95,633
Opus International Consultants McNutt Road reservoir expansion 15,078
Oracle Corporation Canada Inc Software update licence & support 30,706
Ranger Construction Randy Herman Building renovations 23,572
Receiver General For Canada Employer/Employee remittance PP17/07 & PP17/08 819,953
RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ice rental Mar 60,172
Curling rink operating expenses Feb & Mar 14,607 74,779
Ricoh Canada Inc Quarterly copy usage 12,877
Scanned images 2,686
Photocopier staple refills 146 15,709
Ridge Meadows Seniors Society Quarterly operating grant 58,644
Ridge Meadows Recycling Society Monthly contract for recycling 203,709
Weekly recycling 417
Litter pickup contract 1,023
Recycling station pickup 341
Toilet rebate program 242 205,732
RJ Construction 2nd & 3rd floor tower renovations 35,910
Roman Catholic Archdiocese Security refund 20,000
Stantec Consulting Ltd 108 Avenue Watermain (Grant-Albion PRV)2,753
225 Street Pump Station & River Road forcemain capacity study 7,209
270A Street Reservoir 57,846 67,808
T & T Demolition Ltd Debris removal & site clearing - Whonnock Lake Park 60,013
Warrington PCI Management Advance for Tower common costs 60,000
Workers Compensation Board BC Employer/Employee remittance - 1st quarter 153,239
Disbursements In Excess $15,000 7,004,9527,004,9527,004,9527,004,952
Disbursements Under $15,000 880,345880,345880,345880,345
Total Payee Disbursements 7,885,2977,885,2977,885,2977,885,297
Payroll PP17/08 & PP17/09 1,734,1101,734,1101,734,1101,734,110
Purchase Cards - Payment 79,20279,20279,20279,202
Total Disbursements April 2017 9,698,6099,698,6099,698,6099,698,609
1 of 1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: 2017 Council Expenses
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In keeping with Council’s commitment to transparency in local government, the attached Schedule
lists Council expenses to the end of April 2017. The expenses included on the schedule are those
required to be reported in the annual Statement of Financial Information and are available on our
website.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive for information
Discussion
The expenses included in the attached schedule are those reported in the annual Statement of
Financial Information (SOFI), including those incurred under Policy 3.07 “Council Training,
Conferences and Association Building”. The budget for Council includes the provision noted in Policy
3.07 as well as a separate budget for cell phone and iPad usage. The amounts on the attached
Schedule are those recorded prior to the preparation of this report and are subject to change.
“original signed by Paula Melvin”
________________________________________
Prepared by: Paula Melvin
Executive Assistant, Corporate Administration
“original signed by Paul Gill”
_________________________________________
Approved by: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
GM, Corporate and Financial Services
“original signed by Ted Swabey”
______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
702.3
Month of Event Reason for expense Conferences & Seminars Community Events Mileage / Parking Cell Phones / iPads Totals
Bell, Corisa
January Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
February Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
March Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
- - - 12.84 12.84
Duncan, Kiersten
January Cell phone charges 42.80
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
February Cell phone charges 42.80
South Asian Cultural Society Gala 110.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
March Cell phone charges 43.10
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
High Ground Conference 528.48
April Cell phone charges 114.67
May Lower Mainland Local Government Association (LMLGA) Conference 360.00
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
888.48 110.00 - 256.21 1,254.69
Month of Event Reason for expense Conferences & Seminars Community Events Mileage / Parking Cell Phones / iPads Totals
Masse, Bob
January
February
March Ridge Meadows Chamber Business Excellence Awards 125.00
April
May Maple Ridge Community Foundation Citizen of the Year Award 125.00
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
- 250.00 - - 250.00
Read, Nicole
January Cell phone charges 42.80
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
February Cell phone charges 42.80
South Asian Cultural Society Gala 110.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
March Cell phone charges 44.97
Ridge Meadows Chamber Business Excellence Awards 125.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
April Cell phone charges 48.83
May
June
July
August
September
October National Conference on Ending Homelessness 1,149.25
November
December
1,149.25 235.00 - 230.76 1,615.01
Month of Event Reason for expense Conferences & Seminars Community Events Mileage / Parking Cell Phones / iPads Totals
Robson, Gordy
January Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
February South Asian Cultural Society Gala 110.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
March Ridge Meadows Chamber Business Excellence Awards 125.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
April
May Lower Mainland Local Government Association (LMLGA) Conference 360.00
Maple Ridge Community Foundation Citizen of the Year Award 125.00
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
360.00 360.00 - 12.84 732.84
Shymkiw, Tyler
January Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
February South Asian Cultural Society Gala 110.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
March Attendance at meetings - parking 10.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
April
May Maple Ridge Community Foundation Citizen of the Year Award 125.00
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
- 235.00 10.00 25.68 270.68
Month of Event Reason for expense Conferences & Seminars Community Events Mileage / Parking Cell Phones / iPads Totals
Speirs, Craig
January Cell phone charges 42.96
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)8.56
February Cell phone charges 48.29
South Asian Cultural Society Gala 110.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)8.56
March Cell phone charges 42.80
Ridge Meadows Chamber Business Excellence Awards 125.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
High Ground Conference 65.31
April Cell phone charges 41.87
Haney Farmers Market Fundraiser 35.00
Ridge Meadows Multi Cultural Society Inaugural Gala 50.00
May Maple Ridge Community Foundation Citizen of the Year Award 125.00
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
65.31 445.00 - 197.32 707.63
TOTALS 2,463.04 1,635.00 10.00 735.65 4,843.69
800 Unfinished Business
800
0 0 0 0 0
Maple Ridge Amateur Radio Club
Mayor Nicole Read
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge, BC
V2X6A9
April 28, 2017
Her Worship Mayor Read,
M&C_CAO- GM� .... :\��
Other, _______ _
Action:.;.....,...,--------
The Maple Ridge Amateur Radio Club (MRARC) is seeking a Community Gaming Grant in the
amount of$ 19,990.00 in order to update its radio communications and training equipment to
better assist the communities of Maple Ridge, Pitt Meadows, and the Province of British
Columbia, in the event of a local emergency or regional disaster as part of its emergency
preparedness program.
Amateur Radio in general and MRARC volunteers, in particular have an important role to play in
the community by providing emergency and back-up communications to government agencies
while assisting in the health and welfare of our citizens in reconnecting families, often separated
in such events, who are without access to thefr normal means of contact. MRARC volunteers
regularly staff your municipal EOC to help ensure all radio communications equipment is
available and operational if needed.
In additional to its emergency preparedness role, the equipment purchased using this grant
funding will also be used to improve the clubs capability to support local community
organizations with emergency communications at local events such as local community parades,
Halloween events, Scout night hikes, Teny Fox Run etc. These events are not nmmally
supported by other public agencies.
The Lotte1y Grant funds will also allow the club to expand by improving training opportunities
for existing and new MRARC members to expand their electronic knowledge and operational
skills, to better prepare for any such catastrophic event.
Lotte1y Grants are often judged and granted basecl �n the, support or'the local community to an
individual program. Your suppmt of the Maple Ridge Amateur Radio Club in its application to
Ministry of Community, Spmt and Cultural Development, Community Gaming Grants Branch
would be greatly appreciated.
802"Radio Communication is our hobby 11
900 Correspondence
900
901
902
1000 Bylaws
1000
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2013-103-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Final Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7042-2013
12366 Laity Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant has requested that final reading be granted for the subject property, located at 12366
Laity Street (see Appendix A). Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7042-2013 (see Appendix B) has been
considered by Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently was granted third reading. The
purpose of the rezoning is to rezone to the R-1 (Residential District) zone to permit the future
subdivision into four lots (see Appendix C).
Council granted first reading for Zone Amending bylaw No. 7042-2013 on December 10, 2013 and
second reading on September 9, 2014. This application was presented at Public Hearing on October
21, 2014, and Council granted third reading on October 28, 2014. An extension was granted to
third reading on October 27, 2015, and a second extension was granted on October 25, 2016.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7042-2013 be adopted.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on October 21, 2014. On
October 28, 2014 Council granted third reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7042-2013, with the
stipulation that the following conditions be addressed:
i.Road dedication on Laity Street, as required;
ii.Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Tree Protection; and
iii.In addition to the Site Profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional
Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the
subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the
subject property is not a contaminated site.
The following applies to the above:
i.Road dedication on Laity Street has been provided;
ii.A Tree Protection Covenant has been provided; and
iii.A disclosure statement has been provided by a Professional Engineer, assuring that there
is no evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the property.
1001
- 2 -
Note that the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) Program Policy was not in place at the time
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7042-2013 received third reading on October 28, 2014. Council had the
option of applying the CAC rate on the application at the time of the second extension to third
reading in 2016, under the policy; however this condition was not imposed.
CONCLUSION:
As the applicant has met Council’s conditions, it is recommended that final reading be given to Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7042-2013.
“Original signed by Michelle Baski”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT, MA
Planner 1
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng.
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Zone Amending Bylaw No.7042-2013
Appendix C – Proposed Subdivision Plan
City of PittMeadows
District ofLangley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Oct 29, 2013 FILE: 2013-103-RZ BY: PC
CORPORATION OF
THE DISTRICT OF
MAPLE RIDGE
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
124 AVE
LAITY ST´
Scale: 1:1,500
12366 LAITY STREET
APPENDIX A
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7042-2013
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as
follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7042-2013."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 2 District Lot 248 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 7478
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1601 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to R-1 (Residential District).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 10th day of December, 2013.
READ a second time the 9th day of September, 2014.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 21st day of October, 2014.
READ a third time the 28th day of October, 2014.
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX B
21194212091228521206/08212132122512410
12282 2129021303212952133212370
12375
211962119312377
212012121112411
2122821221 21259122942128221279 213212129821329 1232221350 12355213872139712463
2119112387
212031229521222212472124112355
12397
12461
2127021285212932131112323/25
1233021348 21360213672138812
3
5
0
12451
2120612395
12404
12386 2126012375
12350
1236621280 2128221289212912129521302213072131321330213211234321331 12466
12287 2137212296
12427
12370212252122221229
2123812343
12367 2131721310/14/23213442138521191212141240121215
2121612403
12267
12291
21293213141236921336
1235021355 12460
12360
12409
1237812383
12324
12358 21296/982132021340213411
2
4
5
2
21366213772139612370
12380
2119912407 212372123512331
12277
12323 12336
212922129721306213032130821297
12353 21341213711227712365 12270
12439
McCALLUM CT.
DOUGLAS AVE.
123 AVE.DAWSON PL.CARLTON ST.124 AVE.214 ST.278
285
299
365317
282
309
1
2
3
P 51180
12
B
1
195
201
8
98
3
156
319
286 284
P 80424
280 313
5
P 37928
192
P 23730
7
P 15784
194
Rem
18
19
180
P 24856
27
157
P 738941
BCP26209
301
Rem 4
283
304
Rem 5
314
307
207
209
5
8
P 51180
A
17
196
200
P 2485633
26
31
5
2
155
3 LMS 21735
320
277
4
1 2
312 P 56039306
2
14
193
204
208
113 P 20711211
10
9
6
296
295
316
LMP 11733
4
112
205
6 EP 5323320
P 51180
1
P 63795279
P 56039
302
305
315
1
LMP 11193
206
P 143022
2
C
13 11(P 51180)23
21 RP 1385225
30
300
318
298
297
281
303
P 5330
310
191
3 P 14302P 51180
P 7478
4
P 15784
197
6
35
198*PP1157
P 37851
2
322
311
308 BCP 4720924
16 22 P 20711A
32
34P 20711LMP 2942197
199
181
29LMP 35282 LMP 35019
RW 17412
LMP 35291
LMP 35283RW 51181
LAITY ST.DOUGLAS AVE.
´
SCALE 1:2,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
R-1 (Residential District)
7042-20131601
APPENDIX C
1100 Reports and Recommendations
1100
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-035-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: First Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7325-2017
11781 and 11775 Burnett Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject properties located at 11781 and 11775
Burnett Street from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment
Residential) to permit a five storey, 4,562 m2 (49,100 ft2), 64 rental unit apartment building. The
rental units are divided into 41 one-bedroom and 23 two-bedroom units. 74 off-street parking
spaces are located in an underground parking garage. The subject properties are designated as Low-
Rise Apartments in the Official Community Plan, and no OCP amendment is required to
accommodate the proposed development. It is also exempt from the Community Amenity
Contribution Policy because it is located within the Town Centre Area. To proceed further with this
application additional information is required as outlined below.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7325-2017 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D and E of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the additional information described in
this report.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Kevin Bennett, Krahn Engineering Ltd.
Owner: 1083144 BC Ltd.
Legal Description: Lot A, Section 17, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan
22876, and Lot B, Section 17, Township 12, New Westminster
District Plan 22876
OCP:
Existing: Low-Rise Apartment
Proposed: No change
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
1101
-2 -
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Seniors’ Apartments
Zone: CD-5-00 (Senior Apartments)
Designation: Low-Rise Apartment
South: Use: Vacant, but five storey apartment building proposed (2016-145-
RZ)
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Low-Rise Apartment
East: Use: Single Family Houses
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
West: Use: Restaurants and services
Zone: CS-1 (Service Commercial)
Designation: Town Centre Commercial
Existing Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: Rental Apartments
Site Area: 2620 m2 (0.65 acres), both lots combined
Access: Pedestrian and vehicle access from Burnett Street
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
b)Site Characteristics:
The subject properties, located at 11781 and 11775 Burnett Street, are two adjacent, rectangular
shaped lots. The lots are generally flat, and vegetated with grass and some trees.
There are already a number of multi-family apartment buildings, and one seniors’ apartment complex
to the north of the subject properties on the same side (west side) of Burnett Street. A similar, five
storey, 64 unit rental apartment building is also being proposed (2016-145-RZ) on the lots to the
south, which are currently vacant. The subject properties face single family houses on the east side
of Burnett Street, which lie just outside of the Town Centre Area. Four restaurants (A&W, Chinese,
Japanese, and Pizza) are located on the service commercial lot to the west of the subject properties.
c)Project Description:
The development proposal is for a five (5) storey, 64 rental unit apartment building (41 one-bedroom
and 23 two-bedroom units) with approximately 4,562 m2 (49,100 ft2) of floor area. One underground
parking garage provides 74 car parking spaces, seven of which are intended for visitors and one of
which is for disabled parking. A long term bicycle parking room is also proposed in the underground
garage, while at least 20 short term bicycle parking spaces will be provided on the site.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will
need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for
further development permits.
-3 -
d)Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The subject properties are located within the Downtown East Precinct of the Town Centre Area Plan.
The Downtown East Precinct serves as the eastern interface and gateway to the Town Centre. More
urban and pedestrian oriented development is desired in the Downtown East Precinct, which can
include medium to high density residential high-rise towers. This project, a mid-rise residential
building, conforms to the intent of the precinct guidelines of the Town Centre Area Plan.
The subject properties are currently designated Low-Rise Apartment in the Town Centre Area Plan.
An OCP amendment is not required to support the proposed development and rezoning.
The following policies apply to this proposal:
Official Community Plan Policies
3-31 Maple Ridge supports the provision of rental accommodation and encourages the
construction of rental units that vary in size and number of bedrooms. Maple Ridge may also
limit the demolition or strata conversion of existing rental units, unless District-wide vacancy
rates are within a healthy range as defined by the Canadian Mortgage and Housing
Corporation, and,
This project will add up to 64 new purpose built rental housing units to the Town Centre. It currently
proposes 41 one-bedroom and 23 two-bedroom units. No three or more bedroom units, which are
more suitable to families with children, are included in this project.
3-32 Maple Ridge supports the provision of affordable, rental and special needs housing
throughout the District…
This project is in compliance with this policy as it provides rental accommodation. The applicant has
also expressed a willingness and support for integrating affordable housing units, as well as units
which are suited to persons with special needs (e.g. mobility impairments), or which can be easily
adapted for such purposes. The final mix of unit types and affordable housing provisions will be
presented in the second reading report.
3-33 Maple Ridge will encourage housing that incorporates “age-in-place” concepts and
seniors housing designed to accommodate special needs.
Residential units constructed in accordance with SAFERhome standards and with the adaptable
dwelling unit provisions of the BC Building Code (BC Reg. 216/2006, Division B, Section 3.8.5)
support “age-in-place” senior housing. Other projects in the Town Centre Area have volunteered
approximately 10% of their units constructed to these standards. The applicant has expressed a
willingness and support for integrating units which are supportive of seniors.
In summary, the applicant will be asked to provide a revised floor plan identifying the unit mix,
number of affordable units, units for seniors, and units that can accommodate individuals with
special needs as part of the detailed submission prior to second reading. A Housing Agreement will
be used to formalize the mix of unit types (i.e. number of bedrooms, senior, special needs housing)
and affordable housing provisions.
-4 -
Town Centre Area Plan Policies
3-1 An increase in residential and commercial density is encouraged in the Town Centre,
particularly within the Central Business District… Land-use should include a mix of housing
types catering to various demographics, including affordable and special needs housing,
within walking distance to a broad mixture of uses, including shops, services, cultural
facilities, and recreation.
This project will increase the number of purpose built rental units in the Central Business District. It
is located within walking distance to a range of shops, services, and transit in and around the Central
Business District.
3-12 High density development that is four or more storeys in height may be required to
include a shadow study in consideration of adjacent sites to address potential impacts on
available daylight. Consideration should also be given to the privacy of residents in existing
buildings.
This project will be five storeys in height, and be built next to two storey seniors’ apartments on the
property to the north. The applicant will be asked to provide a shadow study.
3-15 Concealed parking structures are encouraged in all commercial, mixed-use, multi-
family uses… in the Town Centre. Below grade parking structures are particularly
encouraged for Low-Rise, Medium, and High-Rise Apartment…buildings.
This project includes an underground parking structure which appears to protrude slightly above
grade. The applicant will be asked to demonstrate how impacts of the above grade parking structure
on the public realm will be mitigated by landscaping, plantings or residential amenity space design.
3-22 All Low-Rise Apartment developments should be a minimum of three (3) storeys and a
maximum of five (5) storeys in height.
This project complies with the height range envisioned by the policy.
Housing Action Plan:
The Housing Action Plan (HAP), which was endorsed by Council in September, 2014 identified rental
housing as a priority. The HAP also speaks of the need to provide a range of non-market, affordable
and special needs housing. This was reaffirmed with the endorsement of the Housing Action Plan
Implementation Framework in September, 2015.
This project meets many of the objectives of the Housing Action Plan to encourage more rental,
affordable and special needs housing in Maple Ridge. The applicant will provide detailed information
about the unit mix for the second reading report. A Housing Agreement will insure that these units
will be retained for such purposes over time.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential) to permit a five storey, 64 unit rental
unit apartment building. The current project requests the following variances from the requirements
of the proposed zone:
-5 -
Increase in height from four storeys to five storeys;
Other variances may be required as the design work on the proposed development progresses.
Requested variances will be detailed more fully in the second reading report. The applicant will also
need to justify variance requests through a Development Variance Permit (DVP) application.
Parking:
This project’s 74 car parking spaces in the underground garage meet the reduced parking
requirements in the Central Business District of the Off-Street Parking Blaw 4350 – 1990. It is
however noted that the City has received complaints about parking from some residents along the
east side of Burnett Street. To date, the nature of these complaints have been about parked vehicles
blocking driveway access or sight lines to the single family houses, rather than about a lack of
parking supply. The City has increased bylaw enforcement along Burnett Street to deal with these
types of complaints.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.11 of the OCP, a Town Centre Development Permit application is required for
all multi-family residential, flexible mixed use and commercial development located in the Town
Centre.
Advisory Design Panel:
The Town Centre Development Permit must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second
reading.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading the
applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy
6.20.
e)Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a)Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
c)Fire Department;
d)Building Department;
e)School District; and,
f)Canada Post.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
-6 -
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading.
f)Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended:
1.A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C);
2.Town Centre Development Permit Application (Schedule D);
3.A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E);
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council
grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second
reading.
“Original signed by Chee Chan”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Chee Chan
Planner 1
“Original signed by Chuck Goddard” for
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Proposed Site Plan
Appendix D – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7325-2017
DATE: Feb 14, 2017
2017-035-RZ
BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
´
Scale: 1:1,500
11775/11781 Burnett StLegend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX A
DATE: Feb 14, 2017
2017-035-RZ
BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
´
Scale: 1:1,500
11775/11781 Burnett St
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7325-2017
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7325-2017."
2.Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot A Section 17 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 22876
Lot B Section 17 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 22876
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1710 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-2 (Medium Density
Apartment Residential).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX D
BURNETT ST.228 ST.
117 AVE.229 ST.
L
O
U
G
H
E
E
D
H
W
Y
.
RITCHIE AVE.
CLIFF AVE.229 ST.11682
11826
11781
2293011848
11857
11869
11856
11811
11749
2283811817
2290511750
2282411844
2289311824
11818
11841
229402292911868 11861
11825
11801
11692
11791
11838
2290411779
229002294511761
2290111831
11798
11845
11816
11868
11681
11788
2285511781
11764
11837
11810
22937229282289711780
11851
11695
11797
2292711765
11690
11768
11878
11791
11771
11830
11821
22805229392285611761
229422278011778
11808
11790
11775
11747
11809
11736 229102279911843
2292011739
2293622780/9011871
2295111858
11851
1183611821
22770Rem. 5
67 1
81
10
Rem.
76
103
106
82
S 1/2 1
84
104
11
1
58
244
125
2
122
A
128
A
B
1
77
227
1
3
105
LOT 2
167
2
119
60'
120
246
126
79
Rem.93
Rem.1
57
1
108
11
89
A
55
3
118
90
12
245
117
"A"
LOT 1
E
Rem 1
2
1
2
127
123
124
80
N 1/2 1
87
243
2
214
Rem
54
88
56
3
86
Rem. A
68
85
Rem. 63
59
78
94
1
4
91
A
83
N 1/2 5
121
53
LMS
2
3
9
0
P 51655
LMP 26960
P 43930
LP 76566
P 8871
P 70383
P 58813
P 12588
NW P 40749P 40889P 83121830
P 72307
P 8881
P 13497
*PP089
LMP 34065 (LEASE)
LP 76344
LP 59674
LMP 11048
P 71517
P 42061
P 59452
P 81957
P 59400P 44489
P 8881
EPP 61886
P 18773LMP 25642 (LEASE)
P 12588
LP 82566RP 8464P 51052
P 18773P 65141
P 41319
LMP 7787P 22046
P 22876P 41319
P 57530P 43788RW 80528RW N'ly 20 Feet
LMP 18896
LMP 18897
EP 42071RW 51656
BCP 50773
LMP 49848
LMP 49850
LMP 7788LMP 49849LMP 7789EP 82567LMP 2414LMP 46902
LMP 2619 LMP 2415RW 79939BURNETT ST.´
SCALE 1:2,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No.From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment Residential)
7325-20171710
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-061-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7336-2017
22255, 22289, 22295, 22323, 22337, 22351, 22359 Dewdney Trunk Road;
12021, 12026, 12027, 12034, 12042, 12043, 12052 Garden Street;
12002, 12032, 12038, 12051, 12061 - 223 Street; and 12011 224 Street;
AND
First Reading Discharge Land Use Contract Bylaw No. 7337-2017
12051 and 12061 - 223 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential), and C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) to CD–1-17 (Comprehensive Development) for
redevelopment over seven (7) phases, allowing for a comprehensively planned mixed-use
commercial / office and residential development on a 2.97 heactares (7.35 Acre) site in the Town
Centre Area. The site is bounded by Dewdney Trunk Road on the south, Brown Avenue on the north,
224 Street on the east and Plaza Street on the west, except for the opthamological clinic property on
Brown Avenue and the Dental / Donair Resturant property on Dewdney Trunk Road.
In addition to the rezoning, there are two other amendments required, Land Use Contract 2435-
1977 will be discharged for 12051/12061 – 223 Street. The proposal may require a map
amendement to Schedule “G” of the Zoning Bylaw to remove a portion of the subject properties from
the area that requires ground floor commercial. Ground level retail will be required along Dewdney
Trunk Road and wrapping at the corners of Plaza Street and 224 Streets.
The proposed buildings will range from two and three storey commercial / office buildings to
residential towers up to 19 storeys in height. Most, if not all parking will be provided underground.
The development proposes significant pedestrian realms, including street fronting retail, internal
mews, playgrounds, and an east west pedestian spine with both a central landscaped area and an
urban plaza with retail activities, public art and pedestrian amenities at the corner of 224 Street and
Dewdney Trunk Road.
Due to the unique design and with the density exceeding the maximum permitted by the C-3 (Town
Centre Commercial), a comprehensive development zone CD-1-17 is being crafted. To bridge
between the maximum density in the C-3 zone and the density being sought by the applicant, there
will be a Master Development Agreement identifying bonus elements other than the normal ones for
underground parking and building height commonly utilized. This Agreement will include such bonus
elements as: Public Art, rental housing, adaptive housing, public access to plaza and open space
elements, landmark features incorporated into the design of the buildings and roof tops, Place-
making, digital display screen, storm water management, electric vehicle charging stations, LEED
certification and other energy, green and sustainable practices as may be applicable to given phases
are proposed.
1102
-2 -
To proceed further, additional information as well as the information outlined above and contained in
following sections of this report and including some general issues identified by Departments, will be
required to proceed past first reading for this application.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1)That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7336-2017 be given first reading and;
2)That Discharge Land Use Contract Bylaw No. 7337-2017 be given first reading; and
3)That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule C, D and E of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the information required for a
Subdivision application and additional information as described in this report dated May 23,
2017.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: SwissReal Developments Ltd.
Owner: 487559 BC Ltd; Brian James Holdings Inc.; Salus Enterprises Ltd.,
Inc. No. 178009; 463226 B.C. Ltd;
Legal Description:
Lot 26 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 17845 (000-969-222)
Lot 27 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 17845(000-969-231)
Lot 8 Except: Part Dedicated Road on Plan LMP5168, District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster
District Plan 20094 (001-115-332)
Lot 3 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 13752 (001-419-684)
Lot 4 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 (001-886-134)
Parcel "B" (Explanatory Plan 9471) of Lot 2 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District
Plan 1112 (001-916-980)
Lot 18 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14549 (002-150-051)
Lot 24 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 15679 (004-031-768)
Lot 1 Block 2 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 (004-067-444)
Lot 3 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 (004-681-088)
Lot 3 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 (004-681-088)
Lot 50 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 48265 (006-217-796)
Lot 52 Except: Part Dedicated Road on Plan 81647, District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster
District Plan 49034 (006-357-571)
Lot 10 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 20094 (008-643-831)
Lot 1 Except: The East 47 Feet; District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 13752
(009-862-510)
Lot 2 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 13752 (009-862-544)
Lot 4 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 13752 (009-862-552)
Lot 2 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 (009-966-552)
Lot 5 District Lot 399 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 14543 (009-966-561)
-3 -
OCP:
Existing: Town Centre Commercial
Proposed: Town Centre Commercial
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), C-3 (Town Centre
Commercial); CS-1 (Service Commercial); and
Land Use Contract Bylaw No. 2435-1977
Proposed: CD-1-17 (Comprehensive Development)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Multi-Family Residential; Vacant Land; School District #42
Office; Single Family Residential Homes; and Royal Canadian
Legion Branch #88
Zone: RM-2(Medium Density Apartment Residential); RS-1(One Family
Urban Residential); CD-1-00(Comprehensive Development
Zone); RM-3(High Density Apartment Residential); RM-
2(Medium Density Apartment Residential); and P-6(Civic
Institutional)
Designation: Brown Avenue is designated as a Major Corridor; Institutional;
Low-Rise Apartment; Single-Family Residential; and Ground-
Oriented Multi-Family.
South: Use: Commercial
Zone: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Designation: Town Centre Commercial)
East: Use: Commercial strip mall
Zone: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial)
Designation: Town Centre Commercial and Park
West: Use: Multi-Family Residential and commercial
Zone: C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) and RM-2 (Medium Density
Apartment Residential)
Designation: Town Centre Commercial
Existing Use of Property: Commercial strip mall; Commercial Retail Units and Single
Family houses.
Proposed Use of Property: 7 phase mixed use residential/commercial and public space
development.
Site Area: 2.97 hectares (7.35 Acre)
Access: Plaza Street and Brown Avenue
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
b)Site Characteristics:
The subject properties are located within the Town Centre Area north of Dewdney Trunk Road; south
of Brown Avenue; east of Plaza Street; and west of 224 Street. Within these blocks 223 Street and
Garden Street runs north and south. The development cell encompasses all of the properties within
the north/south and east/west road network identified above except for portions of 223 and Garden
Street which may be closed; and 22327 Dewdney Trunk Road and 22320 Brown Avenue. The
properties that make up the development cell comprises approximately 2.97 hectares (7.35 Acre)
that contains a mixture of commercial buildings types and businesses; as well as, existing residential
homes in varying degrees of condition.
-4 -
c)Project Description:
Previous application:
In 2011, the City received an application (2011-098-00) for a mixed use commercial / residential
project on the eastern portion of the subject site. This application was granted first reading on
November 8, 2011. The project did not proceed past the land use and density stage, based on a
conceptual plan showing commercial podiums with a series of residential towers and open spaces.
Current Application:
The applicant has applied to develop a Master Planned Development with the vision to create a
neighbourhood within the Town Centre Area. The proposal as presented will be divided over eight
parcels of land consisting of approximately 2.97 hectares (7.35 Acres). The density and uses will be
a mixture over the lands. The applicant is proposing to develop this Master Planned Development as
a 7 phased development. The proposed development will require a Master Development Agreement
to detail the timing of phasing; amenities; and servicing.
The proposed 7 phased Master Planned Development details are outlined below (See Schedule "A"
attached to bylaw):
Phase One - Proposed parcel size 0.94 hectare (2.33 Acres) approximate in size.
i.One – Five storey residential building;
ii.One – Four to Five storey residential building with Commercial Retail Units
(CRUs) located on the ground floor;
iii.Three Buildings – Three Storey Town Homes with roof top decks; and
iv. One Building – Two story residential walk-ups at ground level.
Phase Two – Proposed parcel size 0.94 hectare (2.33 Acres) approximate in size.
i.One – Four to Five Storey Residential building with Commercial Retail Units
(CRUs) located on the ground floor;
Phase Three – Proposed parcel size 0.16 hectare (0.39 Acres) approximate in size.
i.One –Fifteen storey Residential Tower;
ii.One –Five storey residential building;
iii.One – Four storey residential building; and
iv. Amenity Space.
Phase Four – Proposed parcel size 0.31 hectare (0.76 Acres) approximate in size.
i.One – Ten storey residential tower;
ii.One – Two storey residential walk-ups at ground level; and
iii.One Space for public use.
Phase Five – Proposed parcel size 0.14 hectare (0.34 Acres) approximate in size.
i.One – Two storey office and retail building; and
ii.One – Four storey office and school building.
Phase Six – Proposed parcel size 0.51 hectare (1.26 Acres) approximate in size.
i.One – Five storey residential building;
ii.One – Nine Storey residential building;
iii.One – Seventeen storey residential tower;
iv. One – Ground floor Commercial Retail Units (CRUs) building;
v.Open space.
- 5 -
Phase Seven – Proposed parcel size 1.03 Acres (0.42 hectare) approximate in size.
i. One – Nineteen Storey residential tower for rental accommodations;
ii. One – Five storey residential building;
iii. Two - Ground floor Commercial Retail Units (CRUs) building; and
iv. A Plaza located at the corner of 224th Street and Dewdney Trunk Road.
The potential amendment to Schedule ”G” of the Zoning Bylaw is intended to have the ground level
retail alignment and support the applicant’s Master Plan for a retail presence on Dewdney Trunk
Road.
The applicant is proposing to integrate a large public realm through the development. This public
realm as proposed will consist of a neighbourhood level-type park; public plazas and formal and
informal walkways.
The applicant is proposing to provide a variety of rental and market housing, which could include
townhouses; row-houses; low-rise apartments; high-rise apartments and live work studios. Rather
than concentrating the rental units in one phase, distribution of some of this rental housing as well
as incorporating affordably factors and units permit aging in place (Adaptive Housing) will be
explored in accordance with the Maple Ridge Housing Action Plan. To secure the market and non-
market rental, a Housing Agreement will be required.
The applicant has also made attempts to acquire two remaining properties of land in an effort to
make the development continuous. To date the applicant has not been successful; however, they
have advised that they will continue to have a dialogue with these property owners. One of these
lots front Dewdney Trunk Road. The application includes all lots fronting Dewdney Trunk Road,
except this lot. This may be challenging to the City’s desire to acquire all the required right-of-way for
traffic flow functionality. Should this parcel remain outside of the proposed phased development,
consideration will need to be given to how the right-of-way can be obtained. The CD bylaw would
be adjusted to accommodate one or both of these lots if they become part of the application in the
future.
The applicant and the Engineering Department are exploring the potential closing of Garden Street
and 223 Street. This would require the approval of Council by way of a road closure bylaw. The CD
bylaw would be adjusted to accommodate this.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will
need to be made once full application packages have been received.
For this application, the terms and conditions will need to be negotiated regarding timing and
phasing. For example, road widening, truncations, closures and the likes are done prior to final
reading. This can be secured in a variety of ways such as Covenants or amendments to the CD —1-
17 Bylaw. This will be done before the second reading report and will be incorporate as a condition
of the second reading report.
A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to Second Reading. Such
assessment may impact proposed Floor Space Ratios and residential dwelling unit yields, OCP
designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require additional applications, legal instruments or
other plans.
- 6 -
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The development site is located within the Town Centre Area Plan and is currently designated Town
Centre Commercial. The Town Centre Commercial designation intends to create a compact and
vibrant commercial area that is pedestrian–oriented and has a wide array of commercial, mixed-use,
and multi-family residential area. The Policies below support the proposed development rezone to
CD-17-1 and to discharge of Land Use Contract Bylaw No. 2435-1977.
3.3 Land Use Designation – Town Centre Commercial
Policy 3-29 “Building heights within the Town Centre Commercial will range from three (3)
storeys in height to over twenty (20) storeys. Generally, building heights should not be
permitted greater than twenty-five (25) storeys.”
Policy 3-31 “Within a Mixed-Use development, retail, service, and entertainment uses shall
be encouraged at ground level with office and/or residential uses encouraged above.”
3.2 Affordable, Rental and Special Needs Housing
The Official Community Plan Chapter 3, Neighborhoods and Housing identify several issues one of
these issues is housing affordability. Housing affordability is of particular concern for both
homeowners and renters living in the community with almost one-quarter of homeowners considered
to be in Core Housing Need. Core Need is a term used by senior government to determine eligibility
for social housing subsidies. A household is considered to be in core need when appropriate
housing costs more than 30% of its gross income in shelter costs (either rent or mortgage
payments). Housing affordability is also an issue for renters, where 34% are spending in excess of
30% of their gross income on housing. The percentage of residents spending greater than 30% of
gross income on housing is an issue of concern because it’s an indicator that these residents have
less disposable income available for other basic needs, such as food, transportation, clothing,
recreation and leisure. In Canada, housing is considered affordable if shelter costs account for less
than 30 per cent of before-tax household income as defined by the Canada Mortgage and Housing
Corporation (CMHC). However, the City of Maple Ridge Housing Action Plan further defines
affordable housing as follows: Affordable housing is housing that is adequate in standard and does
not cost so much that individuals and families have trouble paying for other necessities such as
food, health, and transportation on an ongoing basis.
In order to address housing affordability, rental and special needs housing the OCP encourages
these provision through the policies detailed below.
Policy 3-30 “Maple Ridge will consider density bonus as a means of encouraging the
provision of affordable, rental and special needs housing, and amenities.”
Policy 3-31 “Maple Ridge supports the provisions of rental accommodation and encourages
the construction of rental units that vary in size and number of bedrooms. Maple Ridge may
also limit the demolition or strata conversion of existing rental units, unless District-wide
vacancy rates are within a healthy range as defined by the Canada Mortgage and Housing
Corporation.”
- 7 -
Policy 3-32 “Maple Ridge supports the provisions of affordable, rental and special needs
housing throughout the District. Where appropriate, the provision of affordable, rental, and
special needs housing will be a component of area plans.”
Policy 3-33 “Maple Ridge will encourage housing that incorporates “age-in-place” concepts
and seniors housing designed to accommodate special needs.”
Maple Ridge Housing Action Plan
Maple Ridge’s vision and commitment to towards housing is encompassed in this statement
contained in the Maple Ridge Housing Action Plan (MRHAP):
"Access to safe, affordable, and appropriate housing that meets the diverse and changing
needs of the community is a priority.”
The proposed development supports the vision of rental units in one building which is being
proposed in a later phase of the project. Having rental units incorporated throughout the
development is encourage to achieve the same level of 10% -15% rental units as other projects in
the Town Centre Area have achieved. The proposal does not yet fully address the vision of
affordability, special needs, or age-in-place. It is recommended that further discussion occur with
the applicant to address these aspects of the vision which have been fulfilled by other applications in
the Town Centre Area.
Zoning Bylaw:
Proposed CD-1-17 Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 22255, 22289, 22295, 22323,
22337, 22351, 22359 Dewdney Trunk Road; 12021, 12026, 12027, 12034, 12042, 12043,
12052 Garden Street; 12002, 12032, 12038, 12051, 12061 - 223 Street; and 12011 224 Street
from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), and C-3 (Town Centre Commercial) to CD-1-
17(Comprehensive Development) to permit a mix residential/commercial use phased development.
Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance
Permit application. Prior to second reading detailed information will be provided to Council regarding
the design; phasing; servicing; amenities; public space; engineering; road alignment and other
details pertinent to the proposal.
CD Bylaw 1-17 contains the following provisions:
Requiring a Master Development Agreement for bonus elements necessary to achieve the
higher density being requested
Providing of the Principal Uses, which are different for different phases of the project;
Having flexible regulations for lot coverage, setbacks and height to accommodate this unique
development;
Setting the maximum Floor Space Ratios and bonus density as necessary to accommodate
the different densities for each phase; and
Applying the landscaping and screening, and the Apartment Use regulation from the
proposed new Zoning Bylaw to this project.
The applicant has reviewed and accepted the CD Bylaw. As detailed information is submitted to the
City minor adjustments may be necessary to the CD bylaw. Any such changes to the CD bylaw will be
identified in a future Second Reading Report to Council.
-8 -
Land Use Contract:
One of the properties making up this proposal (Lot 55 NWD Plan 53750 12051 and 12061 223
Street) is subject to a Land Use Contract from the late 1970’s for parking associated with the Haney
Shopping Centre). This Land Use Contract will not be necessary as the use will be governed by the
proposed CD 1-17 Bylaw.
The mechanism to amend or discharge a Land Use Contract is established in Section 546 of the
Local Government Act, as noted below. Furthermore, the Province has mandated all Local
Governments by Section 547 of the same Act to have all Land Use contracts replaced by Zoning by
June 30, 2022. The applicant is in agreement to the discharge of this Land Use Contract.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.11, a Form and Character Development Permit is required for all multiple
residential, flexible mixed use and commercial development located in the Town Centre Area.
Further discussion will be required with the applicant to determine where a development permit
application will be pursued as part of this rezoning application for all phased or by individual phases
after the rezoning is granted. If the later, Supplementary Design Guidelines will be required to
govern the development concept and all aspects of the project are coordinated and built. This may
be associated with a "No-Build/Development" covenant that specifies phasing, triggering events and
will have the Supplementary Design Guidelines registered on all phases of this development.
Advisory Design Panel:
A Town Centre Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel
prior to Second Reading. The Advisory Design Panel will also be requested to review and comment
on the Development Concept and the Supplementary Design Guidelines.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to Second Reading the
applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy
6.20. In addition, Council Policy 6.20 provides the authority where in the opinion of the Director of
Planning, the development could have a significant impact on the amenities or character of the
surrounding area, particularly in areas of infill development require a Developer Information Meeting.
Since, this development is a multi-phased development the Director of Planning can require a
Development Information Meeting in conjunction with every Development Permit application.
e)Interdepartmental Implications:
Preliminary comments:
The following general issues have been identified to guide the applicant in the matters to be
considered in providing information and developing more detailed plans past first reading:
Engineering Department: Engineering Department has attended several preliminary meetins
regarding the project. At this phase of the review process the Engineering Department
generally does not provide comments. Items that have been discussed are:
Road Improvements and closures;
Hydro lines along Dewdney Trunk Road;
-9 -
Infrastructure upgrades and scheduling improvements to roads and services that do
not match the phasing;
Geotechnical Studies;
Traffic Impact Report, including need for traffic circle at Brown Avenue and 224 Street
and other signal upgrading in the area;
Pedestrian safety requirement, including pedestrian facilities on site and crosswalks
on Dewdney Trunk Road;
Effect of non-participating properties on the required road dedication and
improvements, including bikeways and on-street parking; and
Access to underground parking.
This list is not an exhaustive list of items or issues that the applicant will have to address, but
provides a high level over view of issues and topic that have been brought to the applicant’s
attention.
Fire Department: In meetings with Fire Department staff, we are aware of the need to have
information to be provided by the applicant respecting fire fighting and emergency vehicle
access in compliance with Building and Fire Codes. This would include identifying surfaces of
the underground parking structure needing structural hardening to withstand the weight of
emergency vehicles, and placement of infrastructure such as standpipes and hydrants without
conflicting with landscaping and providing adequate space from buildings and structures to
access them. Adequate setback from the Hydro high voltage lines and the building façades will
need to be incorporate into the sitting and design of the buildings, particularly in respect to
positioning of aerial fire apparatus. As part of the second reading report detailed requirements
will be provided to Council.
Parks and Recreation Department: Parks Department has advised verbally that no additional
park dedication is required as part of this development as nearby parks, such as Haney Nokai
Park are sufficient to serve the needs of future residents in this development. Additionally, the
Parks Department has advised that the Open Spaces network to be accessible to the public is
to be secured by a Statutory Right of Way for public use with suitable indemnification of the
City.
Planning Department:
Terms and Conditions: There are a number of normal terms and condition of rezoning, such
as road construction and demolition of buildings to clear a site and avoid lot line
encroachment. As described earlier in this report, a strategy will be needed to determine
which terms and conditions must be completed before final and which may be phased over
time to avoid disrupting business in operation and maintain traffic and pedestrian
circulation.
Formalizing the Master Plan: There needs to be a process in place to achieve the master
plan being proposed and for future development permits applications governing the form
and character of the buildings and public spaces to achieve the master plan.
Underground Parking: Coordination of access and cross access agreements and
separation of residential and non-residential parking will be required, including the effects
of phasing and any parking reductions that may be supported by Transportation Studies
and/or contributions in lieu of parking.
Other Services: Coordination is necessary with BC Hydro respecting the potential to
relocation the high voltage transmission lines to improve the pedestrian realm of Dewdney
- 10 -
Trunk Road and any improvements for Dewdney Trunk Road as a transit corridor serving
the subject high density site and the Core Precinct of Town Centre Area in general.
Detailed Comments:
In order to advance the current application, after First Reading, detailed comments and input, will be
sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a) Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
c) Fire Department;
d) Building Department;
e) Parks Department;
f) School District;
g) Utility companies;
h) Canada Post;
i) BC Hydro; and Translink.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between First and Second Reading.
f) Early and Ongoing Consultation:
In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community
Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early
posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the City’s website, together with an invitation to the
public to comment.
g) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended:
1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C);
2. A Multi-Family Residential Development Permit Application (Schedule D);
3. A Development Variance Permit (Schedule E); and
4. A Subdivision Application.
In addition, the following supporting details will be required:
Supplementary Design Guidelines to coordinate all phases to achieve the envisioned
development and the associated “No-Build” Covenant;
Amenity and Bonus Elements, including public art, public plaza and open spaces,
land mark features, digital display screen, place making, etc; and
Sustainability Elements (which may also form bonus elements), including a some
water management strategy, green roof/walls, electric vehicle charging, LEED
certification, energy conservation, etc.,
Affordable and Rental Housing, such as Rental and Adaptive Housing subject to a
Housing agreement with the City and indoor amenity space for residents.
- 11 -
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
This development proposal is a major mixed use commercial, residential and rental housing project
in the heart of the Town Centre Area Core Precinct. It will help to achieve Council’s vision of creating
a vibrant downtown area with businesses, stores and offices and housing, all promoting a walkable
downtown with transportation choices – cycling, transit and cars.
The density being proposed in some of the phase of this project exceed the maximum permitted in
the C-3 zone; therefore, a CD zone has been crafted for this project, including some element to
bridge the density difference as agreed to in a Rezoning Agreement.
This initial land use review confirms that the development proposal is in compliance with the OCP,
therefore, it is recommended that Council grant First Reading to zoning bylaw No. 7336-2017. It is
also in order to discharge the land use contract at 12051 and 12061- 223th Street in parallel with
this rezoning as the Land Use Contract is unnecessary and the Province has set a deadline for all
such instruments to be cancelled. Therefore, it is recommended that first reading be granted by
Council to Land Use Contract Discharge Bylaw 7337-2017. Further readings would be subject to
additional information being provided by the applicant and assessed by staff.
“Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski”
_______________________________________________
Co-Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski MCIP, RPP, MCAHP
Planner II
“Original signed by Wendy Cooper”
_______________________________________________
Co-Prepared by: Wendy Cooper, MCIP, RPP
Senior Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7336-2017
Appendix D – Discharge Land Use Contract Bylaw 7337-2017
Appendix E – Proposed Site Plan
City of PittMeadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Mar 3, 2017
FILE: 2017-061-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROWN AVE.222 ST.222 ST.LANEMc INTOSH223 ST.223 ST.224 ST.McINTOSH AVE.McINTOSH AVEGARDEN ST.PLAZA ST.ST.224 ST.222 ST.12148 (ECRA)22336/3812128
11957
12101
2222512026
2236612121
11/3612104
512093
22327/2912087
12061
12040 22229224102232411980
223252240922242223081/7712083
3
222142241022367/8112032
65
12011
12096
11968/70
12002/12
1190922182/1822423/3722207/0951
12042
11950
11968 2231612159
61
29 223502230212117
47
41 11924 22353/5522321/2511955
11990/92/94
12128
12052
2225522295/9912072
11965/67
2236311925
12021
/70224085/475/7022225/2712157
12127
2231122250/5411979/9712052
12097
12130
12150
11955
12043
120
22207223352236411915/19
/42
12082
22264/683
11939
12154
111
12038
12051
3/6712135
5
/1512118
12142
11969/9422276/9212034
12131
312124
19
2235612027
/51
12130
12092
22356/622232022420/4022302/1212170
12096
12151
119982233712127
12084
252241632221912107
11952/54/582228922342/4811926
11982/86223512237422384
15
/78/04529
11960
11933 22326/34223592229812149
39
11963
´
Scale: 1:2,500
DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD, 223 STREET,
GARDEN STREET, 224 STREET
DEWDNEY TRUNK RD
APPENDIX A
City of PittMeadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Mar 3, 2017
FILE: 2017-061-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROWN AVE.222 ST.222 ST.LANEMc INTOSH223 ST.223 ST.224 ST.McINTOSH AVE.McINTOSH AVEGARDEN ST.PLAZA ST.ST.224 ST.222 ST.12148 (ECRA)22336/3812128
11957
12101
2222512026
2236612121
11/3612104
512093
22327/2912087
12061
12040 22229224102232411980
223252240922242223081/7712083
3
222142241022367/8112032
65
12011
12096
11968/70
12002/12
1190922182/1822423/3722207/0951
12042
11950
11968 2231612159
61
29 223502230212117
47
41 11924 22353/5522321/2511955
11990/92/94
12128
12052
2225522295/9912072
11965/67
2236311925
12021
/70224085/475/7022225/2712157
12127
2231122250/5411979/9712052
12097
12130
12150
11955
12043
120
22207223352236411915/19
/42
12082
22264/683
11939
12154
111
12038
12051
3/6712135
5
/1512118
12142
11969/9422276/9212034
12131
312124
19
2235612027
/51
12130
12092
22356/622232022420/4022302/1212170
12096
12151
119982233712127
12084
252241632221912107
11952/54/582228922342/4811926
11982/86223512237422384
15
/78/04529
11960
11933 22326/34223592229812149
39
11963
´
Scale: 1:2,500
DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD, 223 STREET,
GARDEN STREET, 224 STREET
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016
DEWDNEY TRUNK RD
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7336-2017
A Bylaw to amend the Text and Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
_____________________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7336-2017."
2.PART 10, COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT ZONES, is amended by adding the following
section in the correct sequential order:
“SECTION 10__ CD-1-17
A.INTENT
This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of a medium to high
density comprehensively-planned mixed use development in multiple phased in the Town
Centre Area.
B.INTERPRETATION
1. For the purposes of this zone:
(a) Agreement means the Master Development Agreement entered into between the
City of Maple Ridge and SwissReal Investments Ltd.
(b)Schedule A means Schedule “A” attached to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw
No. 7336-2017.
C.PRINCIPAL USES
1. The following principal uses are permitted in each phase:
Phases
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Apartment x x x x x x
Townhouse x
Permitted Principal Uses in the
C-3 Town Centre Commercial
Zone, except Apartment.
x x x x x
APPENDIX C
2
D. ACCESSORY USES
1. The following accessory uses are permitted:
(a) outdoor display or sales area, except in Phases 3 and 4; and.
(b) home occupation, except in Phase 5.
E. LOT AREA & DIMENSIONS
1. Minimum lot area and dimensions shall not be less than:
(a) in lot area 1,500 square metres.
(b) in width 6.0 metres.
(c) in depth 27.0 metres.
F. DENSITY
1. For the land shown as Phase 1 in Schedule A:
(a) The floor space ratio shall not exceed a base density of 1.0 times the net lot area.
(b) An additional density of up to a maximum of 1.0 times the net lot area may be
obtained by providing the following:
(i) An amount equal to 0.40 times the net lot area for providing 100% of the
required parking within a parking structure or within an underground parking
structure; and
(ii) An amount equal to 0.2 times the net lot area for each storey above the
second, not to exceed 0.6 times the net lot area.
(Maximum density with full bonus is 2.0)
2. For the land shown as Phase 2 in Schedule A:
(a) The floor space ratio shall not exceed a base density of 1.0 times the net lot area.
(b) An additional density of up to a maximum of 1.24 times the net lot area may be
obtained by providing the following:
(i) An amount equal to 0.34 times the net lot area for providing 100% of the
required parking within a parking structure or an underground parking
structure; and
(ii) An amount equal to 0.3 times the net lot area for each storey above the
second, not to exceed 0.9 times.
(Maximum density with full bonus is 2.3)
3
3. For the land shown as Phase 3 in Schedule A:
(a) The floor space ratio shall not exceed a base density of 1.0 times the net lot area.
(b) An additional density of up to a maximum of 2.15 times the net lot area may be
obtained by providing the following:
(i) An amount equal to 0.3 times the net lot area for providing 100% of the
required parking within a parking structure or an underground parking
structure;
(ii) An amount equal to 0.1 times the net lot area for each storey above the
second, not to exceed 1.3 times the net lot area, based on the tallest
structure in this phase; and
(iii) An amount equal to 0.55 times the net lot area for providing the bonus
elements as set out in the Agreement.
(Maximum density with full bonus is 3.20)
4. For the land shown as Phase 4 in Schedule A:
(a) The floor space ratio shall not exceed a base density of 1.0 times the net lot area.
(b) An additional density of up to a maximum of 0.88 times the net lot area may be
obtained by providing the following:
(i) An amount equal to 0.28 times the net lot area for providing 100% of the
required parking within a parking structure or an underground parking
structure; and
(ii) An amount equal to 0.075 times the net lot area for each storey above the
second, not to exceed 0.6 times the net lot area based on the tallest
structure in this phase.
(Maximum density with full bonus is 2.0)
5. For the land shown as Phase 5 in Schedule A:
(a) The floor space ratio shall not exceed a base density of 1.0 times the net lot area.
(b) An additional density of up to a maximum of 1.87 times the net lot area may be
obtained by providing the following:
(i) An amount equal to 0.37 times the net lot area for providing 100% of the
required parking within a parking structure or an underground parking
structure;
(ii) An amount equal to 0.5 times the net lot area for each storey above the
second, not to exceed 1.0 times the net lot area based on the tallest
structure in this phase; and
4
(iii) An amount equal to 0.5 times the net lot area for providing the bonus
elements as set out in the Agreement.
(Maximum density with full bonus is 3.0)
6. For the land shown as Phase 6 in Schedule A:
(a) The floor space ratio shall not exceed a base density of 1.0 times the net lot area.
(b) An additional density of up to a maximum of 3.54 times the net lot area may be
obtained by providing the following:
(i) An amount equal to 0.34 times the net lot area for providing 100% of the
required parking within a parking structure or an underground parking
structure;
(ii) An amount equal to 0.1 times the net lot area for each storey above the
second, not to exceed 1.0 times the net lot area based on the tallest
structure in this phase; and
(iii) An amount equal to 2.2 times the net lot area for providing the bonus
elements as set out in the Agreement.
(Maximum density with full bonus is 5.0)
7. For the land shown as Phase 7 in Schedule A:
(a) The floor space ratio shall not exceed a base density of 1.0 times the net lot area.
(b) An additional density of up to a maximum of 2.64 times the net lot area may be
obtained by providing the following:
(i) An amount equal to 0.34 times the net lot area for providing 100% of the
required parking within a parking structure or an underground parking
structure;
(ii) An amount equal to 0.1 times the net lot area for each storey above the
second, not to exceed 1.0 times the net lot area based on the tallest
structure in this phase; and
(iii) An amount equal to 1.3 times the net lot area for providing the bonus
elements as set out in the Agreement.
(Maximum density with full bonus is 4.0)
G. LOT COVERAGE
1. A lot coverage of all buildings and structures shall not exceed 90%, provided that lot
coverage may be 100% where required parking is provided in accordance with
Section 3.6 of Maple Ridge Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350 – 1990,
as amended.
5
H. SETBACKS
1. The minimum setback for all principal buildings and structures shall be not less than:
(a) from a front lot line: 0.0 metre.
(b) from a rear lot line: 0.0 metre.
(c) from a side lot line: 0.0 metre.
(d) from an exterior side lot line: 0.0 metre.
I. HEIGHT
1. Minimum building height shall be three (3) storeys, except 2 storeys in Phase 5.
2. Maximum building height is not restricted in phase 3.4.6 and 7.
J. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
1. All developed portions of the lot not covered by buildings, structures or paved areas
shall be landscaped including the retention of mature trees where possible. This
landscaping shall be maintained.
2. Along the developed sides of the lot which abut a highway, a continuous landscaping
strip of not less than 1.5 metres [5 ft.] in width shall be provided within the lot.
3. The boulevard areas of highways abutting a lot shall be seeded or sodded with grass
on the side of the highway abutting the lot, except at driveways, and walkways.
4. Loading areas, garbage containers and recycling containers shall be screened from
any adjacent residential lot or from overlook from upper storeys, to a height of at
least 2.5 metres [8 ft.] by buildings, a landscaping screen, a solid decorative fence,
or a combination thereof.4.
K. PARKING AND LOADING
1. Off-street parking and off-street loading shall be provided in accordance with Maple
Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350 – 1990, as amended.
2. An off-street parking use shall be sited to the rear of a building, be concealed within a
building or be located underground.
L. OTHER REGULATIONS
1. An Apartment Use shall:
(a) be limited exclusively to storeys above the first storey for a building or a portion
thereof along Dewdney Trunk Road, Garden Street in Phase 7, and the internal
public plaza from 224 Street to Garden Street in Phases 6 and 7.
(b) be located within a building above all storeys which used for non-residential
principal use or off street parking.
6
(c) have separate and independent access.
(d) be permitted only where all parking for such use is concealed parking.
2. The ground floor of all buildings shall have not less than:
(a) 90% of the lot frontage developed for permitted principal uses with public
pedestrian or vehicular access.
(b) 25% of the lot area developed for a permitted principal uses.
3. A minimum of 20% of the site area in Phases 1, 2, 4 and 6, 50% in Phase 5, and 35%
of the site area in Phase 7 in Schedule A shall be provided as useable open space. A
portion of the required open space may be provided on a roof.
4. A minimum of 1.0 sq. m. of indoor amenity space shall be provided for each dwelling
unit on the lot.
5. Every use except for a loading use shall be located and undertaken wholly within an
enclosed building.
6. An off street parking use shall be sited inside a building or underground.
7. A home occupation use shall comply with the regulations of Section 402 (4).
Schedule A to Section 10__ CD-1-17
Insert Schedule “A” that is attached to Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 6966-2013 in place of and delete this
text in italics.”
3. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
LOT 26 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 17845 (000-969-
222)
LOT 27 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 17845(000-969-
231)
LOT 8 EXCEPT: PART DEDICATED ROAD ON PLAN LMP5168, DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1
NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 20094 (001-115-332)
LOT 3 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 13752 (001-419-
684)
LOT 4 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 14543 (001-886-
134)
PARCEL "B" (EXPLANATORY PLAN 9471) OF LOT 2 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW
WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 1112 (001-916-980)
LOT 18 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 14549 (002-150-
051)
LOT 24 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 15679 (004-031-
768)
7
LOT 1 BLOCK 2 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 14543
(004-067-444)
LOT 3 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 14543 (004-681-
088)
LOT 3 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 14543 (004-681-
088)
LOT 50 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 48265 (006-217-
796)
LOT 52 EXCEPT: PART DEDICATED ROAD ON PLAN 81647, DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW
WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 49034 (006-357-571)
LOT 10 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 20094 (008-643-
831)
LOT 1 EXCEPT: THE EAST 47 FEET; DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER
DISTRICT PLAN 13752 (009-862-510)
LOT 2 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 13752 (009-862-
544)
LOT 4 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 13752 (009-862-
552)
LOT 2 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 14543 (009-966-
552)
LOT 5 DISTRICT LOT 399 GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 14543 (009-966-
561)
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. "A" a copy of which is attached hereto and forms
part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to CD (Comprehensive Development) 1-17.
4. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map No. 1712 attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of
, 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
DATE: May 16, 2017
Schedule A
BY: DT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROWN AVE.222 ST.222 ST.LANEMcINTOSH
FRASER ST.223 ST.223 ST.224 ST.RCH AVE.
McINTOSH AVE.McINTOSH AVEGARDEN ST.PLAZA ST.224 ST.FRASER ST.119 AVE.224 ST.21 AVE.222 ST.Phase 6
Phase 1
Phase 3
Phase 4
Phase 5 Phase 7Phase 2
´
Scale: 1:3,000
Bylaw No. 736-2017
Schedule "A"
BROW N AVE.
121 AVE.222 ST.222 ST.LANEMcINTOSH
FRASER ST.223 ST.223 ST.224 ST.CHURCH AVE.
McINTOSH AVE.McINTOSH AVEGARDEN ST.PLAZA ST.224 ST.FRASER ST.224 ST.121 AVE.222 ST.12148 (ECRA)22336/3812128
2219511957
12101
2222512026
224702236612121
2236122311/3612104
2233512093
22327/2912087
12061
12040 22229224102232411980
2232522409222422230822371/7712083
12151/73
222142241022367/8112032
2244112150 (REC CENTRE)
11965
12096
12011
11968/70
12002/12
2218211909/1822423/3722207/0911951
12170 12175
12042
11950 2231611968
12061
12159
11929 223502230212117
12147
11941 11924 22353/5522321/2511990/92/94
11955
12128
12052
22295/992225512072
11965/67
12080
2236312021
11925 /702240822345/4722235/7022225/2712157
12127
2231122250/5411979/9712097
12052
Leisure Complex
12130
12150
119552216012043 2245012063/65
22207223642233511915/1922177/42
12082
22264/6812123
11939
12111
12154
1203812051
22363/6712135
12035
/1512118
12142
11969/9422276/9212034
12131
223231212412119
12027
223561192522194/51
12130
12092
2216822420/4022356/622232022302/1212170
12096
12151
11998223372217912127
12084
2222522416223432221912107
11952/54/582228922342/482217811926
11982/8622351223742238412075
2224111912/78/0412129
2235511960
11933 22326/34223592229812149
12139
12064
11963
62
A
1
B
E32
1
1
CE 47' of 18
2
7
Pcl. 121
1
17
8
1
Rem 112
9
G
16
A18
2 38
Rem 7
1/2
Pcl. "C"
A
11
E
23
4
11
Pcl."A"
13
1
Rem
15
18
1
O
5
21
'
Rem
M
6 Rem7
3
4
212
Pcl. 'A'
M
10
19
42
41
20
12
A of A
97
A
8
B
E
103E11
H
274
79
G
9
S 100 F
10
29
1D
5
A
Rem14
8
13
12
2
275
118
A
9
E
27
42
4
"A"
3 24
20
A
1A
1
39
3
B
14
Rem 1Rem 214
1/2
50
1
"D"
15
14
15
L
4
55
E
A
7
"A"
14
3
B
9
130
1
C
13
Rem5
H
26
6
D
Rem.
Rem
Parcel "A"
"B"
1
N
272
5
28
9
44
P
52
F
10
B
4
W
1
Rem 8
1
2
273
P 16997
LP 77311P 11291 *LMP6622LMP 39518(lease)EP 10792LMP 27702
P 57090
LMP 34533
P 70168
P 67041
P 3175
P7676NWS 1357
NWS 44 P 3206P 41066
P 20094
LMP 39839
P3206
*PP074P 49482
P 16997*LMP4261 P 14543P 22450EP 11807P 11291P 10305P 6024
*LMP29676
P 3206 P 53750P 8148
(P 9669)P 8540P 36157 P 14397P 16304 (P 3206)P 9669
LMP 27701
P 17845P 60562*LMP22658P 22111RP 52529RP 9654P 20094
P 15679NWS 2675
P 3175
P 20094 P 13752(BB4084864)P 49778
P 74119
LMP 2358
P 4076
BCP35451
NWS 3233 P 4076
RP78676P13752
(P 8380) P 8380
NWS 1688
NWS 133
LMP 26551P 10689
P 6076
AP 15022P 61856
P 6325
EP 11502
LMP 46699
LMS 4011
P 61324
RP 59105 P 48265P 14543P 3206P 13752NWS 2870
P 3206
*PP069 P 14543EP 9471
P 16997
LMP 24836LMP 43240
P 20094
P 18496
P 8148
NWS 418
P 8978
P 8148
LMP 34533
P 3206 *PP068P 61062P 42415P 15022
LMP 12218 LMP 44378
RP 34540P 13752(P 38752)
P 3206
P 16997
P 44211
(EPS 2668)
P 49034
P 13752LMP 516
8 LMP 24830EP 74120
EPP 55550BCP 50303
LMP 39562 (lease)
LMP 4709
EP 76100 EP 61325EP 54063 LMP 27700LMP 30148 (LEASE)
LMP 46998 (Lease)
EP 49989 RW 78233LMP 37897
7.5LMP 2359
RW 75573
LMP 87 LMP 24837LMP 46998 (Lease)
LMP 87LMP 4968EP 69139
BCP 15939
RP 81647
LMP 24829
LMP 24835EP 76099
LMP 43241
RW 45029
LMP 24838EP 72617 LMP 24828
RP 60276LMP 174RW 48132PLAZA ST.´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential, C-3 Town Centre Commercialand LUC No. 2435-1977CD-1-17 (Comprehensive Development)
7336-20171712
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7337-2017
A Bylaw to authorize the Discharge of Land Use Contract Bylaw No. 2435-1977
____________________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, on the 28 day of April, 1977, the City entered into a Land Use Contract with CANADA
SAFEWAY LIMITED for the use and development of the lands therein described;
AND WHEREAS, 487559 BC LTD, the present owner of the land described in Section 1 of this Bylaw,
has applied for a discharge of Land Use Contract No. 2435-1977 registered against the title under
Filing No. P11973.
AND WHEREAS the Council deems it expedient that the rights and obligations created and to be
performed under the said Land Use Contract should terminate and be no longer of force or effect;
AND WHEREAS Section 546 of the Local Government Act, R.S.B.C, 2015, c.1, as amended, proved
that a Land Use Contract may only be discharged by bylaw and only after a Public Hearing.
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.That the Land Use Contract entered into the 28 day of April , 1977, between the City of
Maple Ridge and Canada Safeway Limited respecting the use and development of lands
known as:
Parcel Identifier: 005-165-598
Legal Description: Lot 55, District Lot 399, Group 1, New Westminster District.
Plan 53750
(12051/12061-223rd Street)
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1713 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw.
Registered in the New Westminster Land Title Office on the 09 day of February, 1978, under
Filing Number P11973, is terminated.
2.THAT the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign and affix the seal of the
Corporation to such instrument as will effectually extinguish all rights and obligations created
by the Land Use Contract and will release and discharge the Land Use Contract from the
records of title to aforesaid lands in the New Westminster Land Title Office.
APPENDIX D
3. This bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge Land Use Contract Bylaw No. 2435-1977,
Discharge Bylaw No. 7337-2017”.
READ a first time the day of , 2017.
READ a second time the day of , 2017.
READ a third time the day of , 2017.
ADOPTED the day of , 2017.
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
BROW N AVE.
121 AVE.222 ST.222 ST.LANEMcINTOSH
FRASER ST.223 ST.223 ST.224 ST.CHURCH AVE.
McINTOSH AVE.McINTOSH AVEGARDEN ST.PLAZA ST.224 ST.FRASER ST.224 ST.121 AVE.222 ST.12148 (ECRA)22336/3812128
2219511957
12101
2222512026
224702236612121
2236122311/3612104
2233512093
22327/2912087
12061
12040 22229224102232411980
2232522409222422230822371/7712083
12151/73
222142241022367/8112032
2244112150 (REC CENTRE)
11965
12096
12011
11968/70
12002/12
2218211909/1822423/3722207/0911951
12170 12175
12042
11950 2231611968
12061
12159
11929 223502230212117
12147
11941 11924 22353/5522321/2511990/92/94
11955
12128
12052
22295/992225512072
11965/67
12080
2236312021
11925 /702240822345/4722235/7022225/2712157
12127
2231122250/5411979/9712097
12052
Leisure Complex
12130
12150
119552216012043 2245012063/65
22207223642233511915/1922177/42
12082
22264/6812123
11939
12111
12154
1203812051
22363/6712135
12035
/1512118
12142
11969/9422276/9212034
12131
223231212412119
12027
223561192522194/51
12130
12092
2216822420/4022356/622232022302/1212170
12096
12151
11998223372217912127
12084
2222522416223432221912107
11952/54/582228922342/482217811926
11982/8622351223742238412075
2224111912/78/0412129
2235511960
11933 22326/34223592229812149
12139
12064
11963
62
A
1
B
E32
1
1
CE 47' of 18
2
7
Pcl. 121
1
17
8
1
Rem 112
9
G
16
A18
2 38
Rem 7
1/2
Pcl. "C"
A
11
E
23
4
11
Pcl."A"
13
1
Rem
15
18
1
O
5
21
'
Rem
M
6 Rem7
3
4
212
Pcl. 'A'
M
10
19
42
41
20
12
A of A
97
A
8
B
E
103E11
H
274
79
G
9
S 100 F
10
29
1D
5
A
Rem14
8
13
12
2
275
118
A
9
E
27
42
4
"A"
3 24
20
A
1A
1
39
3
B
14
Rem 1Rem 214
1/2
50
1
"D"
15
14
15
L
4
55
E
A
7
"A"
14
3
B
9
130
1
C
13
Rem5
H
26
6
D
Rem.
Rem
Parcel "A"
"B"
1
N
272
5
28
9
44
P
52
F
10
B
4
W
1
Rem 8
1
2
273
P 16997
LP 77311P 11291 *LMP6622LMP 39518(lease)EP 10792LMP 27702
P 57090
LMP 34533
P 70168
P 67041
P 3175
P7676NWS 1357
NWS 44 P 3206P 41066
P 20094
LMP 39839
P3206
*PP074P 49482
P 16997*LMP4261 P 14543P 22450EP 11807P 11291P 10305P 6024
*LMP29676
P 3206 P 53750P 8148
(P 9669)P 8540P 36157 P 14397P 16304 (P 3206)P 9669
LMP 27701
P 17845P 60562*LMP22658P 22111RP 52529RP 9654P 20094
P 15679NWS 2675
P 3175
P 20094 P 13752(BB4084864)P 49778
P 74119
LMP 2358
P 4076
BCP35451
NWS 3233 P 4076
RP78676P13752
(P 8380) P 8380
NWS 1688
NWS 133
LMP 26551P 10689
P 6076
AP 15022P 61856
P 6325
EP 11502
LMP 46699
LMS 4011
P 61324
RP 59105 P 48265P 14543P 3206P 13752NWS 2870
P 3206
*PP069 P 14543EP 9471
P 16997
LMP 24836LMP 43240
P 20094
P 18496
P 8148
NWS 418
P 8978
P 8148
LMP 34533
P 3206 *PP068P 61062P 42415P 15022
LMP 12218 LMP 44378
RP 34540P 13752(P 38752)
P 3206
P 16997
P 44211
(EPS 2668)
P 49034
P 13752LMP 516
8 LMP 24830EP 74120
EPP 55550BCP 50303
LMP 39562 (lease)
LMP 4709
EP 76100 EP 61325EP 54063 LMP 27700LMP 30148 (LEASE)
LMP 46998 (Lease)
EP 49989 RW 78233LMP 37897
7.5LMP 2359
RW 75573
LMP 87 LMP 24837LMP 46998 (Lease)
LMP 87LMP 4968EP 69139
BCP 15939
RP 81647
LMP 24829
LMP 24835EP 76099
LMP 43241
RW 45029
LMP 24838EP 72617 LMP 24828
RP 60276LMP 174RW 48132PLAZA ST.´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose:To Remove LUC No. 2435-1977 as shown
7337-20171713
APPENDIX E
-1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2015-297-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7331-2017 and
First Reading
Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7332-2017
Second Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7183-2015
23025, 23054, 23060, 23070, 23075, 23089 and 23095 Lougheed Highway and
11305, 11383, 11428 and 11438 232 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject properties located at 23025, 23054, 23060,
23070, 23075, 23089 and 23095 Lougheed Highway and 11305, 11383, 11428 and 11438 232
Street (Appendix A and Appendix B) from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-2 (Urban
Residential District), RM-1 (Townhouse Residentia and C-1 (Neighourhood Commercial), to permit a
future subdivision of approximately 89 R-2 lots, 262 townhouse units, a one acre active park,
conservation areas, and construction of a mixed-use commercial residential building consisting of
about 929 square metres of retail space and a minimum of 24 rental apartment units. There will be
no tandem parking in this project.
There is also a site specific C-1 Zone text amendment to combine the C-1 and C-5 permitted uses,
including the provision of at least 24 rental apartment units, a third of which would be adaptive
dwelling units secured through a Housing Agreement. The Zone amending bylaw requires the existing
zoning to be amended as follows:
Adding a site specific text amendment to the C-1 Zone to list the following as Additional Principal
Uses:
i.Apartment Use
ii.Assembly, including daycare;
iii.Civic;
iv. Financial Services;
v.Indoor Commercial Recreation;
vi. Business Services;
vii. Professional Services;
viii. Coffee Shops;
ix.Liquor Primary Establishments; and
x.Retail Sales excluding Highway Commercial Use.
Adjust the zone boundaries in the schedule attached to the Zone Amending Bylaw
accommodating road and parkland modifications;
Change the former Interpretive Centre on the east side of Lougheed Highway to a townhouse
pocket to be zoned RM-1 (Townhouse Residential). A child play area in the single family
residential pocket along 232 Street is being introduced in place of the Interpretive Centre; and
To change the lot coverage, siting, height and gross floor area regulations.
1103
-2 -
Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7183-2015 (Appendix D) and considered
the early consultation requirements for the Official Community Plan (OCP) amendment on November
24, 2015.
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7331-2017 (Appendix C) provides for OCP text
amendments and designation boundary changes.
Section 6.3.6 Neighbourhood Commercial Centres in the Official Community Plan is proposed to be
amended to identify the portion of the site proposed to be zoned C-1 as a Neighbourhood
Commercial Centre.
Schedules B and C of the Official Community Plan (OCP) need to be amended. With these following
amendments, this application will be in compliance with the OCP:
Schedule B of the OCP requires two amendments. Firstly, redesignating the portion of the site
for the proposed neighbourhood commercial centre and rental housing development from Urban
Residential to Commercial. Secondly, redesignating the portion of the site for the central park
from Urban Residential to Park.
Schedule C of the OCP needs the have the Conservation designation boundaries adjusted for
ground-truthing.
Pursuant to Council policy, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution
Program as follows:
$4,100.00 per townhouse dwelling unit: 262 times $4,100 = $1,074,200.00; and
$5,100.00 per single family lot: 88 times $5,100 = $448,800.00.
It is estimated that the total voluntary Community Amenity Contribution amount will be
$1,523,000.00. This will be collected as a condition of rezoning. And that a further voluntary
$1,000.000.00 Community Amenity Contribution will be made. The total voluntary contribution is
now $2,530,000.00 and will be collected prior to final reading. In addition a voluntary park
improvement contribution of $150,000.00 will be made. Based on the development proposal, it is
estimated that the applicant will also be required to pay development Cost Charges in excess of $5
million.
Rental and Adaptive Housing is being proposed and secured through 23070 Lougheed Highway
Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7332-2017 (Appendix E).
The applicant has also offered to provide a minimum of 24 rental apartment units in the mixed-use
building, above the first floor commercial units. The mix will be 42% (a minimum of 10 units) one
bedroom units, 25% (minimum 6 units) two bedroom units and a minimum of 33% (minimum 8
units) of three bedroom units. Of these, a minimum of one-third (8 units) will be designed to permit
aging-in-place, being designed to meet SaferHome Standards (Appendix A attached to the bylaw in
Appendix E) and in accordance with Section 3.8.5 Adaptive Dwelling Units of the British Columbia
Building Code. And that 2 fast charging electrical vehicle outlets will be provide for public access. A
security is to be collected to insure these units are provided.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1)That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and
on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7331-2017 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a
- 3 -
Development Information Meeting (DIM), and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any
further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw;
2) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7331-2017 be considered in conjunction with
the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
3) That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7331-2017 is consistent
with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
4) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7331-2017 be given first and second
readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
5) That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7183-2015 be amended as identified in the staff report dated
(May 23, 2017), be given second reading as amended, and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
6) That 23070 Lougheed Highway Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7332-2017 be given first reading;
7) Collecting a security for the provision of rental housing in accordance with the agreement to be
entered into under 23070 Lougheed Highway Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7332-2017;
8) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the
deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;
ii) Approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure;
iii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedules "B" and “C”
iv) Road dedication on Lougheed Highway, Haney Bypass and 232 Street as required;
v) Park dedication as required, including construction of walkways, multi-purpose trails, plaza
and public art space and emergency access roads; and removal of all debris and garbage
from park land;
vi) Acquisition of the 1 acre central park to the City;
vii) Voluntary park improvement contribution of $150,000.00 for the central park;
viii) Two (2) fast charging electrical vehicle outlets;
ix) Consolidation of the subject properties along the proposed zone boundaries;
x) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the
suitability of the subject properties for the proposed development;
xi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the protection of the Environmentally Sensitive
areas (wetlands) on the subject properties;
xii) Registration of a “No Build” Restrictive Covenant, substantially in the form of the draft
attached as Appendix F, for the multi-residential and commercial / rental apartment
portions of the subject site. It will restrict development until future subdivision or
development permits are issued by Council that comply with Supplementary Design
Guidelines (Schedule “A” attached to the “No-Build” Covenant in Appendix F). This
covenant is to require the single residential and townhouse units be prewired for electric
vehicle slow charging and one publically accessible fast charge electric vehicle charging
station associated with the mixed-use Commercial / Rental Apartment site;
xiii) Registration of a Statutory Right-of-Way plan and agreement, including saving harmless the
City, over the townhouse and commercial / apartment sites where public pathways,
walkways or other interconnections throughout the site and into the Kanaka Regional Park
are proposed;
- 4 -
xiv) Registration of a Reciprocal Cross Access Easement Agreement between the two
townhouse lots south of the Lougheed Highway, as may be necessary;
xv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the Visitor Parking;
xvi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management;
xvii) Registration of a Housing Agreement in accordance with Section 483 of the Local
Government Act and a Restrictive Covenant stating that a minimum of 24 dwelling units will
be restricted to rental units;
xviii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant stating that a minimum of one third of the dwelling
units subject to the Housing Agreement will be designed and build to comply with
SaferHome Standards, (see Schedule A attached to the bylaw in Appendix E), and in
accordance with Section 3.8.5 Adaptive Dwelling Units of the British Columbia Building
Code;
xix) Security for the apartment units to be provided in accordance with the Housing Agreement;
xx) Removal of existing building/s;
xxi) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional
Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the
subject properties. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the
subject property is not a contaminated site;
xxii) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $1,523,000.00 to be provided in keeping
with the Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions; and
xxiii) A further voluntary Community Amenity contribution, in the amount of $1,000,000.00.
DISCUSSION:
1) Background Context:
Applicant: Polygon Development 309 Ltd. T. Maginnis Cocivera
Owner: BC Transportation Financing Authority
Legal Description: (see Appended to report)
OCP:
Existing: Urban Residential, Conservation
Proposed: Urban Residential, Commercial and Conservation
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: R-2 (Urban Residential District), RM-1 (Townhouse Residential),
C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial) with Site Specific text amendment to add
more permitted uses and change other regulations as described in this
report.
- 5 -
Surrounding Uses:
Portion of site north of Lougheed Highway:
North: Use: Telosky Park, Thomas Haney Centre, Thomas Haney Secondary
and Maple Ridge Lawn Bowling Facility;
Zone: CD-1-89 (Assembly, Civic, Park & School);
Designation: Institutional;
East: Use: Townhouses and vacant (forested);
Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential);
Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation;
South: Use: Townhouses;
Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential);
Designation: Urban Residential;
Portion of site south of Lougheed Highway:
Northwest: Use: Residential and Bare Land Strata Residential;
Zone: R-1 (Residential District) and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential);
Designation: Urban Residential;
Southwest: Use: Across Haney Bypass:
CP Rail rail line, Kanaka Creek Regional Park;
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential);
Designation: Park, Urban Residential and Conservation;
East: Use: Townhouse and Rural Residential;
Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential);
Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation;
Existing Use of Property: Vacant with treed ravine areas
Proposed Use of Property: Residential and Commercial
Site Area:
Access: 232 Street, Lougheed Highway and new cul-de-sac street south off
of Lougheed Highway. Emergency and future restricted access to
Haney Bypass after upgrading is authorized and undertaken by the
Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure.
Servicing: Urban or Rural Standard
Previous Applications: 2014-120-RZ (denied at first reading)
Companion Applications: 2015-297-DP (Phase one Townhousing (112 units))
2016-279-DP and 2016-280-DP (combined natural features and
watercourse protection development permit applications)
2) Background:
Originally, the subject lands (Appendix A) were to be part of a proposed north-south transportation
corridor, feeding into a new link across the Fraser River referred to as the “Cottonwood Crossing.”
However, after the alignment at 200 Street was selected and the Golden Ears Bridge was built, the
lands became surplus and are being disposed of by the Province.
In 2015, the lands were subject to an earlier development application by a different developer
(Qualico Developments Inc.) that was similar in nature consisting of: townhomes; street townhomes;
single family lots and a large commercial uses. However, this application was denied by Council. The
reasons for denial were that no rental housing was proposed and the commercial building was
deemed to be excessive in size, thus being unsupportable in three respects: (1) contrary to OCP
- 6 -
Policy 6-32 for size; (2) not aligning with the Maple Ridge Commercial and Industrial Strategy; and (3)
the potential negative impacts on the Town Centre Area by its close proximity and wide range of uses
being proposed.
The current applicants (Polygon and Morningstar), have tailored their application to address the
concerns raised by Council with the earlier proposal. This includes: proposing rental market housing,
developing a comprehensive plan to help establish a “sense of place” for the new community,
providing public art, and adhered to Policy 6-32 while asked for a limited expansion of the permitted
uses that are appropriate to a neighbourhood level and that do not negatively impact the Town
Centre Area or its commercial viability.
Council granted first reading to the Polygon/Morningstar proposal on November 24, 2015. A full
application with supporting documentation having been submitted, reviewed and found to be
generally in compliance with OCP policies by City Departments; therefore, this application is being
brought forward to Council to grant second reading, advance the application to Public Hearing and
subsequently setting terms and conditions to be fulfilled prior to adoption.
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7183-2015 (Appendix D) has been changed since first reading to reflect
the detailed submission from the applicant. The maps attached to Bylaw No. 7183-2015 had the
boundaries for the portions of the lands being zoned adjusted for the reconfigured central park and
ground truthing. The additional site specific permitted uses and regulations for siting and floor area
were also added to Bylaw No. 7183-2015.
OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7331-2017 (Appendix C) accompanies this application to designate the
portion of the subject site for Neighbourhood Commercial Centre, in support of the 929 square
metre commercial mixed use building and adjusting the Conservation designation boundaries for
ground-truthing.
23070 Lougheed Highway Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7332-2017 (Appendix E) also accompanies
this project to authorize the City to enter into a Rental Housing Agreement for not less than 24
apartment units. These units would be situated above the commercial level of the proposed mixed
use commercial/residential building.
Council will have the opportunity to review and approve the design of this commercial mixed use
building as part of a future development permit application.
3) Project Description:
Overview:
The lands subject to this rezoning application were part of Ministry of Highways properties once
slated to accommodate the alignment of the “Cottonwood Connector” through East Maple Ridge.
The connector is no longer to be constructed; therefore, the site is being sold by the Province.
The development site (Appendix A) consists of two disconnected sites made up of 11 lots – eight (8)
lots to the north and three (3) lots to the south of Lougheed Highway. The areas are approximately:
Area in Hectares Area in Acres
Total Site 21.1 52.21
North Portion 9.7 24.0
South Portion 11.4 28.2
- 7 -
The development concept plan (Appendix G) partitions the subject site into the following Areas:
Area Proposed Use
Southern Portion
A 28 lot single residential subdivision
B 112 Townhouse Phase 1
C Mixed-use Commercial / Rental Apartments (24 dwellings)
D Central Park Area (about 1 acres)
E 130 Townhouse Phase 1
F ESA Area
G ESA Area
Northern Portion
H 61 lot single residential subdivision
I 20 Townhouse included in Phase 1
J ESA Area
K ESA Area
L ESA Area
South Portion: The land is vacant, mainly cleared and generally slopes to the southeast (towards
Morely Creek on adjacent lands) and the south west (towards Roslyn Creek which flows through the
site in the west). There are three (3) steep slope areas:
• Bisecting the site diagonally from the northwest to southeast near the Haney Bypass;
• Running north to south behind the residential lots fronting Olund Crescent and 231 Street near
Lougheed Highway; and
• Running north to south along the eastern side of the site associated with Morely Creek. The
southern portion of the creek was piped along the lot line shared between the development
site and the townhouse project to the east as well as under the Haney Bypass.
There is an existing R-1 (Residential District) and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) bare land strata
neighbourhood to the west, and two RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) lots and a RM-1 townhouse
complex to the east.
North Portion: This is made up of two areas, which are separated by 232 Street. The North Portion is
covered with trees, has steep slopes and Morley Creek flows south and is piped under the Lougheed
Highway. The lots in the southern part are vacant with clearings, possibly one former house site near
232 Street. The lands slope from the middle of the site east to 232 Street and west towards the
creek and rising up to the fields associated with Telosky Park and Thomas Haney Centre.
There is an existing townhouse complex to the south and the Telosky Park /Thomas Haney Senior
Secondary and associated recreational uses to the north.
Across 232 Street are two lots characterized by steep slopes and ravines containing Salamander
Creek and its tributaries. Consequently, these lands will retain their existing RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) zoning and will be designated Conservation and dedicated to the City as conservation
lands. Townhouse facing Cottonwood Drive is located to the east of this pocket.
Proposed phasing: The entire site is proposed to be rezoned at one time and developed at stages .
Based on the information available at the time this report was written, the phasing is as follows:
- 8 -
Phase 1: This phase includes the two single residential subdivisions (Area A with 89 R-2 lots),
the 112 townhouse units on the south side of the Lougheed Highway (Area B) and 20
Townhouse units (Area I) on the north side of the Lougheed Highway. The applicant
anticipates development of Phase 1 to commence in October 2017;
Phase 2: This phase includes the 130 Townhouse (Area E) proposed in the central and lower
portion of the site that abuts the Haney Bypass and the Commercial / Apartment building
(Area C) with a minimum of 24 rental apartments. This phase is proposed to commence in
November 2019.
4) Planning Analysis:
i) Official Community Plan:
The development site is currently designated a combination of Urban Residential and Conservation.
With respect to the residential component, the subject site is designated Urban Residential – Major
Corridor in the OCP. This designation provides for a range of residential uses, including ground
oriented housing forms such as single detached dwellings, garden suites, duplexes, triplexes, four
plexes, townhouses, apartments or intensive small lot residential subject to compliance with the infill
and compatibility policies. The proposed residential uses (R-2 (Urban Residential District) and RM-1
(Townhouse Residential) zones) are in compliance with the OCP.
The identification of undevelopable areas to be retained as conservation has been established by
ground truthing, with compensation areas for allowable encroachments. As a result of this, the
Conservation Designation boundaries will need to be adjusted in the OCP.
For the commercial component, OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7331-2017 is to re-designate the portion
of the site for the proposed commercial mixed use building for the proposed C-1 (Neighbourhood
Commercial) Zone. Policy 6.3.6 is also being amended to identify this site as a Neighbourhood
Commercial Centre.
The following is a summary of OCP Policies and brief staff comments as related to the mixed use
commercial / multi-family residential component of this project:
OCP Policy Staff Comment
6 - 30 Maple Ridge will encourage the development of
Neighbourhood Commercial Centres within walking
distance of neighbourhoods to service the daily
convenience shopping and service needs of residents in
the local neighbourhood.
The proposed mixed use
commercial / residential
building is compliant with this
size restriction and its location
is within walking distance of
residents residing nearby or
who will reside after the site
develops.
6 - 32 Total commercial space in a Neighbourhood Commercial
centre is typically less than 930 square metres (10,000
square feet) in area.
3 - 32 Maple Ridge supports the provision of affordable, rental
and special needs housing throughout the District. Where
appropriate, the provision of affordable, rental, and special
needs housing will be a component of area plans.
This proposal will by
constructing at least 24 rental
apartments secured by a
housing agreement
The proposed re-designation to permit a neighbourhood commercial building with rental housing
complies with Policies 3-32 encouraging rental housing be built in the City, Policy 6-30 to
accommodate daily shopping needs within walking distance of a neighbourhood and Policy 6-32 with
respect to allowable size.
- 9 -
With respect to the parkland and trail system forming an integral part of this development, the
following policies apply:
OCP Policies:
4 - 8 Maple Ridge will ensure that parks, leisure and cultural facilities and services are provided for
in the changing and growing community in accordance with the Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Parks,
Recreation and Culture Master Plan, taking into account the joint delivery of services in Maple Ridge
and Pitt Meadows.
Staff comment: Assuming a average household size of 3.1 persons for the 374 dwelling units to be
constructed, this development may generate as many as 1,200 residents. There is a need to have
sufficient parkland to accommodate the active park activities for this new community. The
approximately one acre park is therefore justified.
4 - 9 Maple Ridge will partner with Regional and Provincial agencies, and neighbouring municipalities
to advance the implementation of the Regional Recreation Greenway Network, embedded within the
Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy.
Staff Comment: The Regional Plan proposes a grade separated overpass of the Haney Bypass and
CP Rail right of way between the subject site and the future extension of Kanaka Creek Regional
Park along the Fraser Waterfront. The location of this north landing of this pedestrian overpass is
reflected in the concept plan for the Phase 2 townhouse development in accordance with this policy.
4 - 10 Maple Ridge recognizes that access to parks and green spaces greatly enhances community
health and individual quality of life, and will continue to maintain and enhance the large network of
trails and green space.
Staff Comment: Conservation areas are proposed to be dedicated as part of subdivision, and a trail
network built as part of development permit conditions as part of this project, in accordance with this
policy.
Housing Action Plan:
The proposal closely aligns to the intent of the Maple Ridge Housing Action Plan. The project will
result in a range of housing and includes a minimum of 24 rental housing units, with approximately a
6% portions being Adaptive Housing to accommodate gaining in place. There are no affordable units
proposed. This housing will be secured by way of a Housing Agreement in accordance with the
Housing Action Plan.
Parks Master Plan Policies:
The following policies apply from the Parks Master Plan:
Parkland Supply
Ensure that all residents have access to community and neighbourhood parks within a 10
minute and 5 minute walk, respectively.
Ensure that there is an adequate supply of each type of parkland to meet needs.
Staff Comment: The size and location of the Central Park and the Tot Lot are in compliance with
this policy.
- 10 -
Trails and Greenways
Increase the number of different types of trails to accommodate more use, provide
transportation alternatives, and to increase interconnectivity.
Staff Comment: The proposed pedestrian trail system is in compliance with this policy.
Park Design and Development
Design parks to be safe and with opportunities for a wide variety of activities, age groups, and
ability levels, keeping current with trends.
Staff Comment: The applicant has submitted a conceptual park rendering (Appendix K) showing
opportunities to configure various active recreational components.
ii) Zoning Bylaw:
Details of Proposed Rezoning:
The site is proposed to be rezoned from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-2 (Urban
Residential District), RM-1 Townhouse Residential and C-1 Neighbourhood Commercial Zones and
site specific text amendments associated with the C-1 Zone (see Appendix C).
R-2 Zoned Areas:
A total of approximately 88 R-2 lots in two pockets are being proposed. The Zoning Bylaw requires
R-2 lots to have a minimum lot size of 315 square metres, a minimum depth of 27 metres and a
minimum width of 10.5 metres for an interior lot and 13.5 metres for an exterior lot.
The eastern pocket (Area H) consists of approximately 60 R-2 lots (minimum lot size of 315 square
metres) with an area set aside for a tot lot. A road from 232 Street west to a proposed new
signalized intersection with Lougheed Highway is being accommodated by this subdivision (Appendix
H). There will be some stabilization work on a portion in the northeast corner of the site that will not
be developed.
The western pocket (Area B) consists of approximately 28 R-2 lots (minimum lot size of 315 square
metres). This will complete the existing subdivision by looping 230th Street through to 113th Avenue
(Appendix I).
The layouts provided are preliminary. They appear to meet the R-2 area and dimension requirements;
however, the layout may change and the number of resulting lots may be reduced due to adjustment
for environmental reasons. The layouts have not been reviewed for acceptance by the Approving
Officer or the Engineering Department; therefore the final lot yields may change. The building
envelope to accommodate the Morningstar lots may also require minor setback variances and some
lots may require minor variances to minimum width or depth for infill in the western pocket. A
Development Variance Permit report will be forwarded to Council describing any variance being
requested at the same time as the final reading report concerning the rezoning.
RM-1 Zoned Areas:
A total of approximately 262 Townhouses in two phases are being proposed. One of the phases
spans both sides of Lougheed Highway and the other will be south of Lougheed Highway.
A development permit application accompanies this rezoning application for the first phase
townhouse pocket. The proposed form, character, design and landscaping are described in more
detail in a subsequent section of this report. This initial townhouse phase will consist of
approximately 112 townhouse units and stretch from the ravine on the north side of Lougheed
Highway, across the highway and southward to the ridge bisecting the site north of the Haney
Bypass.
- 11 -
This following table contains some of the particulars for each of the proposed townhouse phases:
Townhouse Phase Lot B and I Lot E
Number of Units 131 130
Floor Space Ratio Up to 0.6
(currently proposes as 0.57)
Up to 0.6
(currently proposes as 0.48
The boundaries between the areas proposed to be rezoned to RM-1 and being retained in
Conservation may be subject to minor adjustments due to additional ground-truthing information. As
is demonstrated in the table, both phases have a Floor Space Ratio (FRS) less than the maximum
permitted for the RM-1 Zone. Therefore, if the area being rezoned to RM-1 zone is decreased, the
currently proposed densities are less then the zone maximum and can accommodate a marginal
decrease in site area. Alternatively, the number of units or the floor area of units may be decreased
so density is not increased or exceeds the 0.6 FSR permitted in the RM-1 Zone.
A Common Facility called “The Clubhouse” (Appendix J) is proposed to be built as part of Lot E, in the
vicinity of the mixed use commercial / rental apartment phase. It will have a floor area of
approximately 560 square metres and will feature a great room, fitness studio, pool, hot tub and
resident manager dwelling.
C-1 Zoned Area:
A mixed use commercial / rental apartment building is proposed on an approximately 0.24 hectare
portion of the site fronting on the south side of Lougheed Highway. Parking will be underground. A
single level of commercial area not greater than approximately 1,039 square metres is proposed in
accordance with OCP Policy 6-32. Two floors of residential floor space up to 2,186 square metres,
consisting of a minimum of 24 apartment units is proposed. The mix of units is as follows:
42% (a minimum of 10 units) one bedroom units;
25% (minimum 6 units) two bedroom units; and
33% (minimum 8 units) of three bedroom units.
Of these, a minimum of one-third (8 units) will be designed to permit aging-in-place, being designed
to meet SaferHome Standards (Appendix A attached to the bylaw in Appendix E) and Adaptive Unit
Building Code requirements.
The rental apartments, the mix and the provision of some adaptive units will be subject to a Housing
Agreement (Appendix E) with a performance security.
This portion of the development will be in a future phase following rezoning. It is not being
accompanied with a Development Permit application at this time. Based on the conceptual plan,
some variances will be required, such as relaxing the height restriction. A development permit for the
detailed design and development variance permit application will be forwarded for Council approval
in the future.
P-1 Zoned Lands:
Two areas are being zoned P-1:
A Central Park in the Sothern Portion of the subject site, consisting of approximately 0.4 hectare
(1 acre), will be developed with a contribution from the developer for active recreational use
(Appendix K); and the applicant has requested that some DCC forgiveness be applied in
exchange for the park;
A Tot Lot in the Northern Portion of the subject site as shown in Appendix L.
- 12 -
Remaining Areas:
The remaining lands (Areas F, G, J, K and L) will be active or passive parkland as follows:
There will be two active areas. In the southern portion will be a central active park with an area of
approximately 4,096.9 square metres. In the northern portion will be a tot lot.
The remainder of the site, approximately 8 hectares (20 acres) or 37% of the subject site will be
dedicated as passive open space, predominantly designated Conservation.
Site Specific Text Amendment:
The applicant has requested site specific changes to the Neighbourhood Commercial C-1 Zone
provisions.
Changes to the Use Provisions:
The applicant has requested that Principal and Accessory uses be expanded to resemble the C-5
Village Centre Zone Commercial Use established for use in the Albion Plan Area. The uses in that
zone very closely align with the applicant’s desire to achieve the following:
to keep the commercial centre under the 929 square metres maximum size as required in OCP
Policy 6-32 for Neighbourhood Commercial Centres;
not to have the size and types of uses detract from the commercial viability of the Town Centre
Area; and
to develop a village-like commercial centre and focus that is well integrated and interconnected
with the surrounding residential community being developed.
The proposed uses to be added on a site specific basis, are checked off and highlighted in the below:
Currently Uses permitted in
the C-1 Neighourhood
Commercial Zone
Proposed site specific uses to be
added from the C-5 Village
Commercial Zone
Key:
Already permitted in C-1
Add
Do Not Add
Proposed site specific
uses requested by
the applicant and to
accommodate rental
and adaptive housing
convenience store;
restaurant;
personal services;
personal repair services;
Convenience store
Restaurants
Personal Services
Personal Repair Services
Assembly;
civic;
financial services;
indoor commercial recreation;
business services;
professional services;
retail sales excluding highway
commercial use;
Liquor Primary Establishment;
recycling depot;
Licensee Retail Store
Apartment
At the applicant’s request, a recycling depot is not included because the applicant is concerned that
too many truck movements and odours may be associated with this use.
- 13 -
Changes to Other Provisions:
The applicant has requested the following regulations be amended for the Commercial Mixed
Use/Residential building:
Regulation Current Proposed
Lot coverage maximum 40% maximum 50%
Height maximum 7.5 metres maximum 12.0 metres and
maximum 3 storeys
Siting
7.5 metres front;
6.0 metres rear;
3.0 metres interior;
7.5 metres exterior
3.0 metres from all lot lines
Gross Floor Area
Commercial maximum:
279 square metres
Total: 3,350 square metres
Commercial maximum:
1,093 square metres
Apartment use Language from proposed
new zoning bylaw applied
These site specific amendments are justified because:
This provides sufficient floor area to accommodate the envisioned range in rental unit sizes;
Parking being underground permits a larger floor plate with sufficient land area for landscaping
and extension of commercial activates such as a restaurant or coffee shop into the out of doors.
The building height and closer proximity to the streets contributes to the goal of Place-making,
gives a stronger pedestrian environment along the abutting streets and supports this mixed-use
building become a village landmark for the surrounding community and along the Lougheed
Highway corridor.
The setback along the eastern edge of the proposed building site may be increased due to
geotechnical and environmental setbacks. This will be reviewed as part of a future development
permit applicant for the mixed-use building and brought forward to Council at a future date.
Housing Agreement:
In conjunction with the proposal to redesignate about 0.21 Hectares (0.53 Acres) to Commercial to
allow for a Neighborhood Commercial Centre, the applicant has offered to provide a minimum of 24
rental housing units in a mixed use commercial / residential building.
23070 Lougheed Highway Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7332-2017 is attached in draft form
(Appendix E). It is still undergoing legal review with the applicant and is expected to be in final form
in the near future. The draft agreement attached needs to be adopted by bylaw, but is not subject to
a Public Hearing. The draft agreement will contain the following provisions:
A minimum of 24 rental housing units, with a mix of 1, 2 and 3 bedrooms noted in the previous
section of this report;
These rental units are to be built and maintained in perpetuity;
A minimum of one third of these rental dwelling units will be designed and built as adaptive
housing to permit aging in place, subject to SaferHome Standards, (Appendix A attached to the
bylaw in Appendix E), and in accordance with Section 3.8.5 Adaptive Dwelling Units of the BC
Building Code; and
- 14 -
Given there is no development permit and the development of this phase is in the future, a
security deposit to be agreed upon is to be collected and held by the City for the rental
apartment units until they are built.
“No-Build” Covenant:
Rezoning applications for multi-residential and commercial projects are accompanied by a
development permit application that is processed in parallel with a rezoning. This permits Council, as
well as residents attending Public Hearing, to better visualize a development proposal. The no build
covenant is not adopted by bylaw and is simply a charge on future property titles. It is not subject to
a Public Hearing and is currently being reviewed by the City solicitor and may be altered prior to
registration.
Build out for this development is proposed over a period of about two years; however, the applicant
is requesting that the entire site be rezoning with a development permit for the first townhouse
phase, but not for the latter rezoned townhouse phase or the mixed use commercial / rental
apartment building phase. To accommodate this approach, a “no build covenant” (Appendix F) is
proposed to be registered on the entire site providing the following:
Detailed Conceptual Plan: A detailed concept plan has been developed by the applicant for the
entire site. It identifies the proposed internal and public road systems, a conceptual plan for
each phase of the development is developed, it establishes the number of units or lots in each
phase, has developed an active and passive parkland plan with trails interconnecting the entire
development and connecting to adjacent areas.
Conceptual Trail Network Plan: A trail system is proposed to provide interconnection through the
site, including nature walks and convenient pedestrian access to the Central Park and
commercial centre. This plan will help to guide the interconnections as the site is developed over
time.
Supplementary Design Guidelines: The Development Permit Guidelines in the OCP guide
developers and Architects in proposing buildings and structures that reflect the form and
character of design envisioned by Council to be built in the community. However, to achieve the
comprehensively planned community and to coordinate the form and character of each phase of
this project, the applicant has proposed Supplementary Design Guidelines (Schedule “A”
contained in Appendix F) be established.
These Supplementary Design Guidelines embody the applicant’s objective of incorporating the
principle of “place making”, public art, aging in place and sustainability to guide overall site
development. These guidelines include:
Developing the site in a way that respects the natural terrain and protects the environmentally
sensitive areas, creating a community with “doors on the streets”, pedestrian friendly, and safe
(CEPTD);
A hierarchy of interconnected open spaces, including an active central park;
Architectural character, form and massing establishing distinct and identifiable communities
while maintaining a harmony tying together the overall project and a strong relationship to the
natural environment;
Enhancing the overall character of the development through appropriate landscaping, provision
of amenities, including public art, and emphasis on sustainable practices, including energy
efficiency and stormwater management practices related infiltration and improving water quality.
Noise Mitigation Measures: The “Guidelines for New Development in Proximity to Railway
Operations” prepared by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Railway Association
of Canada apply to the site as described in a later section. One or more clauses will establish the
consultant assessments to accompany subsequent development permit application for
- 15 -
landscaping, design and construction requirements to mitigate potential noise and vibration
impacts on for people living in proposed units most affected by train operations.
The above restrictions and requirements are proposed to be nested into a “No Build” Covenant. It
will not allow any development on the site unless the following additional applications are received
for the other phases:
Two Single Residential Pockets: The single residential subdivisions applications are made and
the Approving Officer is satisfied that matters contained the “No-Build” Covenant as it may
pertain to the development are satisfied;
Second Townhouse Phase: A Development Permit application is made and approved by Council
for the second townhouse phase that complies with the development concept and proposed trail
system, the Supplementary Design Guidelines, Section 8.7 Multi-Family Development Permit
Area Guidelines and noise mitigation as may apply for that development proposal;
Mixed-use Commercial / Rental Apartment Building: A Development Permit application is made
and approved by Council for the mixed-use commercial / rental apartment building phase that
complies with the development concept and proposed trail system, the Supplementary Design
Guidelines, Section 8.5 Commercial Development Permit Area Guidelines and noise mitigation
as may apply for that development proposal.
Noise Impacts:
The site is subject to the “Guidelines for New Development in Proximity to Railway Operations”
prepared by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Railway Association of Canada. A
preliminary assessment by the developer concluded mitigation measures would include:
A minimum 30 metre setback, an earthen berm with a 3.0 metre high acoustic fence on top,
foundation isolation and mass materials for building facades or equivalent alternatives. The
developer further comments that the tracks are not directly adjacent to the site, but south of the
Haney Bypass. In a portion of the site, is elevated creating a natural bank shielding the site from
the rail line below. However, there is no earthen bank with fence along the CP Rail line corridor.
Units close to the Haney Bypass will be designed with non habitable spaces (e.g. laundry rooms)
toward the tracks and habitable rooms away from the tracks.
Double glazed windows incorporating acoustic seals will be used and some windows will be
inoperative.
Dense materials that absorb sound will be used in the construction and building face.
Foundations for units in the southern part of the subject site will incorporate measures to reduce
the transmission of vibration through the ground due to passing trains.
Archeological Review:
The applicant has supplied the City with an Archeological Impact Assessment, which was prepared
by the Katzie Development Corporation-Archaeology for the Ministry of Transportation and
Infrastructure and provided to the applicant. The report concludes:
No further archaeological studies are required for the Cottonwood Lands; and
If archeological remains are encountered, all work on the site must stop and the Archaeological
Branch must be contacted immediately.
Community Amenity Contributions:
This application is subject to Council’s policy respecting the voluntary Community Amenity
Contributions. All the single residential lots and the townhouse units are subject to this policy. Rental
housing secured by Housing agreement are exempted under the Policy.
- 16 -
Pursuant to Council policy, this application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution
Program as follows:
$4,100.00 per townhouse dwelling unit: 262 times $4,100 = $1,074,200.00; and
$5,100.00 per single family lot: 88 times $5,100 = $448,800.00.
It is estimated that the total voluntary Community Amenity Contribution amount to be collected as a
condition of rezoning will be $1,523,000.00. A further voluntary community amenity contribution of
$1,000,000.00 is being offered voluntarily by the applicant. A voluntary park improvement
contribution of $150,000.00 for the central park is also being provided by the applicant.
iii) Proposed Variances:
A Development Variance Permit application will be required for the current and future phases of this
project. The following is a preliminary list of necessary relaxations:
Single Residential Subdivision: For some of the R-2 lots, the rear lot setback would be reduced
from 7.5 metres to 6 metres to accommodate the developers stand yard depth. Relaxation of the
height is being requested to permit a variety of roof forms and for more flexibility in dealing with
sloping sites.
Townhouses: For the RM-1 zoned portions of the site, the rear lot setback would be reduced from
7.5 metres to 6 metres to accommodate the developers standard yard depth. Relaxation of the
height is being requested to 13 metres and 3 storeys, to permit a variety of roof forms and for
more flexibility in dealing with sloping sites, not require the window view arc requirement and
reducing the minimum useable open space by about half in lieu of the amount of natural open
space (about 20 acres), which is undevelopable and set aside.
Mixed Use Building: The portion of the site for C-1 zoning requires two variances. One is to allow
the second and third floors to have the same plate size as the first floor. This change is being
proposed in the new Zoning Bylaw. The second is to set the parking requirement commensurate
with rental housing parking demand. The Off Street Parking and Loading Bylaw will need to be
varied to apply a parking requirement of one space per apartment unit as has been done for other
C-1 Zone rental apartment developments in the City.
The required variances for the first Townhouse phase is being processed together with the rezoning
and will be the subject of a future Council report.
iv) Development Permits:
Pursuant to Sections 8.7 and 8.5 of the OCP, Multi-Family Development Permit application for each
townhouse phase and a Commercial Development Permit application for the mixed use component
is required to address the current proposal’s compatibility with adjacent development, to enhance
the unique character of the community and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses.
Appendix M contains Architectural and landscaping plans for the first phase townhouse
development.
Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a combined Natural Features / Watercourse Protection
Development Permit application is required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and
enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas for all development and subdivision activity or
building permits for:
All areas designated Conservation on Schedule “B”;
All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent;
All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Schedule “C”
- 17 -
The necessary applications have been made and are undergoing staff review. Development permit
2016-279-DP for the northern portion of the site and 2016-280-DP for the southern portion of the
site will be considered and issued in accordance with the delegated authority granted by Council to
the Director of Planning before final reading is considered.
V) Advisory Design Panel:
The Advisory Design Panel (ADP) reviewed the conceptual plan for the overall development and the
form and character and the landscaping plans of the proposed first phase Townhouse at a meeting
held on February 15, 2017.
The conceptual site plan for the development was, at the time a work in progress respecting the
configuration of the central active park. The Architect presented the first Townhouse phase adjusted
for the modified park, which was not yet reflected in the plans circulated to the members of the ADP.
Following presentations by the project Architect and Landscape Architect, the ADP made the
following resolution that:
Given that the presentation materials differ from the submission made for ADP review, that the
proposal be re-submitted and presented at a future Advisory Design Panel meeting with the following
concerns addressed:
1. Provide dimensional material in lieu of vinyl.
2. Provide further articulation on the rear elevation.
3. Consider more uniform composition of glazing.
4. Show more details and locations how the building responds to grade change.
5. Provide details and sections of tiered retaining wall including landscape treatment.
6. Provide details for acoustic and landscape treatment along Lougheed Highway. Consider
acoustic fence.
7. Provide landscape treatments and planting in detail.
8. Provide legend or schedule of hard scape treatment.
9. Use native trees and plants near the conservation area and forest edge.
10. Show the overall layout of the park in relation to the building layout adjacent to Lot D.
11. Provide more details regarding public art and place making.
A resubmission will be required in the near future. These and subsequent ADP concerns will be fully
addressed and reflected in the final plans. A detailed description of how these items were
incorporated into the final design will be included in a future development permit report for the
phase 1 townhouse development to Council.
vi) Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting was held at Thomas Haney Secondary on April 12, 2017.
Twenty-Two (22) people attended the meeting. The applicant advised the following:
The meeting was well attended by both neighbours and citizens of Maple Ridge at large. There is
considerable interest in the project, given its size and prominent location. Overall the attendees
expressed support for the scheme, with many welcoming the addition of 350 reasonably priced new
homes, the protection of wildlife corridors and the traffic lights on Lougheed to slow the traffic
coming down the hill. Neighbours directly adjacent are also looking forward to the new storm water
control measures we will install, that will prevent water running into their yards. For neighbours who
- 18 -
had concerns, the main ones had to do with 1) traffic within the single family neighbourhood and on
232 St., 2) the preservation of forested areas, and 3) geotechnical stability.
The applicant proposes to address the above stated concern as follows:
1. The traffic issue is resolved by not having road connections to Harrison Rd. This will prevent any
multifamily traffic from entering the single family neighbourhood. The small amount of traffic
generated by the 29 single family homes is not going to create traffic congestion according to the
Traffic Study.
2. The developer is preserving over 20 acres of forested land in four areas. Additionally, vegetation
on the steeply sloping portions of the two southern townhouse pockets is being preserved.
3. The Geotechnical Report will address slope stability in detail. Retaining walls are proposed along
the property lines with the single family area to the west in the south portion of the project, which
will be designed and assured by the Geotechnical Engineer.
vii) Parkland Requirement:
The Parks, Recreation and Culture Department has identified need for a 0.4 hectare (one acre)
active park in the Southern Portion of the site and a Tot Lot in the Northern Portion of the site to
anticipate the recreational needs of residents and provide safe child play areas.
The developer will be required to comply with the park dedication requirements of Section 510 of the
Local Government Act prior to subdivision approval.
For this project, there is sufficient land that is proposed to be dedicated as park on the subject
properties and this land will be required to be dedicated as a condition of Final Reading.
5) Environmental Implications:
Significant information and review has been conducted by the applicants QEP and the City’s
environmental review staff to determine the appropriate ESA boundaries on the site. Over 20 acres
of environmentally sensitive land will be dedicated to the City for long term preservation.
Enhancement and restoration work, including a new trail system, will be carried out where necessary
in this land. The final boundaries of the ESA lands will be fine tuned after third reading as part of
the subdivision process. Should the developable areas of the site be reduced, some density
adjustments may be required. The reduction of density after third reading does not invalidate a
public hearing.
6) Traffic Impact:
As the subject properties are located on a provincial highway (Haney Bypass) and a referral to the
Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure is necessary to review access, traffic circulation and the
parking areas.
Ministry approval of the Zone Amending Bylaw will be required as a condition of final reading. At this
time, the Ministry has granted preliminary approval of the development application.
7) Interdepartmental Implications:
i) Engineering Department:
The Engineering Department has identified that all the services required in support of this
development application do not yet exist to the various sites. It will therefore be necessary for the
- 19 -
owner to enter into a Rezoning Servicing Agreement and post securities to do the work identified in
that agreement prior to final reading. Comments provided by the Engineering Department include:
1. The construction of a connecting road to a collector standard from 232 Street to Lougheed
Highway with the installation of a traffic signal at the Lougheed Highway location. This road will
include concrete curbs and sidewalks, street lighting and street trees on both sides of the road
and bicycle facilities, and will allow for some on-street parking.
2. The construction of a municipal road to the townhouse development from Lougheed Highway
with the installation of a traffic signal on Lougheed Highway at this location. This road will be
constructed to a collector standard and include concrete curbs and sidewalks, street lighting and
street trees on both sides of the road, bicycle facilities and will allow for on-street parking. It is
recommended that parking be time-limited due to the park and commercial uses.
3. A Stormwater Management plan is required. It must be demonstrated if the watercourse and/or
facilities are adequate to support the drainage from these sites and other tributary drainage, and
to determine that no adverse impact on adjacent properties will occur.
4. Road improvements are required along Lougheed Highway which includes ensuring a separated
bike lane can be accommodated on both sides of the road.
5. Road improvements including road re-profiling along 232 Street. A concrete curb and sidewalk,
bicycle facility, street lights and street trees will also be required.
6. Road improvements may be required along the Haney Bypass and are subject to the Ministry of
Transportation and Infrastructure approval.
7. Road dedication is required along 232 Street to provide for a 26m right-of-way. The proposed
municipal roads will be dedicated to a 20m right-of-way as required for collector roads. Corner
truncations will also be required.
8. A servicing design is needed and will be required to comply with Municipal standards. The
design will include all services need to serve the proposed townhouse sites and the two new
municipal roads. Roads and services required for the two single family developments will be
provided at the subdivision stage
9. Servicing security will be required for the construction of a half cul-de-sac across the park
frontage for the internal municipal road for the single family development between 232 Street
and the Lougheed Highway. The design and construction of the full cul-de-sac will be done at the
subdivision stage.
10. Water, storm sewer and sanitary sewer mains will be assessed for condition and capacity and
will be upgraded if required.
In addition to the items above, the Engineering Department has received a Traffic Impact Study in
support of the development. The Study indicates:
1. That the Haney Bypass/Lougheed Highway intersection is currently operation at a poor Level Of
Service (LoS) for westbound traffic. This intersection will continue to operate this way even with
the 4-laning of the Bypass and that a grade separated interchange may be required to alleviate
the congestion at this intersection.
2. There is no capacity on the Haney Bypass to accommodate vehicles directly from this site until 4
travel lanes are constructed.
3. The construction of a connecting road from 232 Street to Lougheed Highway is expected to
address the illegal u-turns currently occurring on Kanaka Way as vehicles will now be able to
access 232 Street from Lougheed Highway.
ii) Parks Recreation and Culture Department:
Parkland needs for this development have been identified by Parks Recreation and Culture as
follows:
- 20 -
Due to the potential population being generated by this development, an active park space is
required on the Southern Portion of the site. A Central Park of approximately 0.4 hectare (one
acre) is being provided and improved by the developer to provide for the active park and
recreational needs of area residence (Appendix K).
Due to its isolation from the main site, a Tot Lot is required to be provided and improved by the
developer. The Tot Lot is being provided (Appendix L) as part of the 60 lot R-2 residential
subdivision on Lot H of the project.
An integrated pedestrian network consisting of nature and other trails interconnecting the site
and to adjacent developed lands, the municipal sidewalk system and new crosswalks for safe
connections across Lougheed Highway.
iii) License, Permits and Bylaws Department:
The Building Department has no comments at this time. The Geotechnical Report will be registered
on title and the grading plan will be assessed more closely at the subdivision stage for the single
residential subdivision and at the building permit stage for subsequent phases.
iv) Fire Department:
The Fire Department has been in conversation and review with the applicant over the details of the
access and roads widths that will service this new community. All dwelling and buildings will be
sprinklered and provided with access routes that meet the Fire Department’s requirements. Further
review will occur at the Building Permit stage.
8) School District No. 42 Comments:
Pursuant to Section 476 of the Local Government Act, consultation with School District No. 42 is
required at the time of preparing or amending the OCP. The following comments were received from
School District No. 42 on February 16, 2016 in response to the City’s referral:
The proposed amendment to the Official Community Plan would affect the student population for
the catchment area currently serviced by Golden Ears Elementary and Thomas Haney Secondary
School.
Golden Ears Elementary has an operating capacity of 526 students. For the 2015-16 school year
the student enrolment is 465 students (88.4% utilization) including 151 students from out of
catchment; and
Thomas Haney Secondary has an operating capacity of 1,200 students. For the 2015-16 school
year the student enrolment is 1,129 students (94.1% utilization) including 682 students from
out of catchment.
9) Intergovernmental Issues:
i) Local Government Act:
An amendment to the OCP requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to
adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 477 of the Local
Government Act. The amendment required for this application involving establishing a Commercial
for a Neighbourhood Commercial Centre and adjusting Conservation designation for ground-truthing,
is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond
existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council
of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and
Provincial Governments.
- 21 -
The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste
Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact.
CONCLUSION:
This development represents a significant addition to the City and will provide a significant number
of benefits. Some of these benefits include: at least 24 rental apartment units under a Housing
Agreement; a new neighbourhood park, significant CAC contributions, play field improvements; public
art; electrical charging stations; 20 acres of enhanced conservation land; about 350 new homes; a
new street light, walking trails, street upgrades in the area and a neighbourhood commercial centre.
Therefore, it is recommended that first and second reading be given to OCP Amending Bylaw No.
7331-2017, and Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7332-2017, as well as second reading be given to
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7183-2015, and that application 2015-297-RZ be forwarded to Public
Hearing.
“Original signed by Adrian Kopystynski”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adrian Kopystynski MCIP, RPP, MCAHP
Planner
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7331-2017
Appendix D – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7183-2015
Appendix E – 23070 Lougheed Highway Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7332-2017
Appendix F – Draft No-Built Covenant
Appendix G – Conceptual Development Plan
Appendix H – Subdivision Plan for Area H
Appendix I – Subdivision Plan for Area A
Appendix J – Amenity Building
Appendix K – Central Park
Appendix L - Tot Lot
Appendix M – Architectural and Landscaping plans for first Phase Townhouse Project
- 22 -
Legal Descriptions
Lot 31 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595 (002-818-451)
Lot 32 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595 (002-818-477)
Lot 27 Except: Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan 71204; District Lot 403 Group 1 New
Westminster District Plan 44493 (007-476-621)
Lot 28 Except Part in Highway Plan 71204, District Lot 403 Group 1 New Westminster
District Plan 44493 (007-476-647)
Lot 29, Except: Part on Statutory Right Of Way Plan 71204, District Lot 403 Group 1 New
Westminster District Plan 44493 (007-476-655)
Lot 3 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 17222 (010-263-071)
Parcel "M" (Reference Plan 681) District Lot 403 Group 1 New Westminster District (012-
943-908)
Parcel "One" (Explanatory Plan 8328) of Parcel "J" (Reference Plan 3829) Except: Part on
Statutory Right of Way Plan 71204; District Lots 402 And 403 Group 1 New Westminster
District (012-944-157)
Parcel "D" (Reference Plan 1017) South West Quarter Section 16 Township 12 New
Westminster District (013-301-080)
Parcel "L" (Reference Plan 3957) of Parcel "J" (Reference Plan 3829), Except: Firstly : Part on
Statutory Right of Way Plan 4834; Secondly: Part Lying South of Road Shown on Statutory
Right of Way Plan 4834; Thirdly : Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan 71204; District Lots
402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District (014-508-397)
Part (.015 Acres Plan 3041) of Parcel J (Reference Plan 3829) District Lot 403 Group 1 New
Westminster District (023-360-488)
DATE: Oct 8, 2015
FILE: 2015-297-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT´
Scale: 1:5,000
BC TRANSPORTATION PROPERTIESLegend
Stream
Ditch Centreline
Edge of River
Edge of Marsh
Indefinite Creek
River Centreline
Lake or Reservoir
Marsh
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX A
City of PittMeadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Oct 8, 2015
FILE: 2015-297-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
City of Maple Ridge´
Scale: 1:5,000
BC TRANSPORTATION PROPERTIES
(2011 IMAGERY)
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7331-2017
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014
_______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedules "B" & "C" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7331-2017.
2. That Chapter 6 Employment Section 6.3.6 Neighbourhood Commercial Centres Designations
is amended by adding the following sentence at the end of the first point under Issues:
The property designated on the south side of the Lougheed Highway between 116 Avenue
and the Haney Bypass/Kanaka Way is suitable for development as a neighbourhood
commercial centre with rental housing.
3. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 31 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595
(002-818-451);
Lot 32 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595;
(002-818-477); and
Parcel "L" (Reference Plan 3957) of Parcel "J" (Reference Plan 3829), Except: Firstly :
Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan 4834; Secondly: Part Lying South of Road Shown
on Statutory Right of Way Plan 4834; Thirdly : Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan
71204; District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District (014-508-397)
and on Map No. 942, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is
hereby designated/amended as shown.
4.Schedule “C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 31 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595
(002-818-451)
Lot 32 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595
(002-818-477)
APPENDIX C
Lot 27 Except: Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan 71204; District Lot 403 Group 1
New Westminster District Plan 44493 (007-476-621)
Lot 28 Except Part in Highway Plan 71204, District Lot 403 Group 1 New
Westminster District Plan 44493 (007-476-647)
Lot 29, Except: Part on Statutory Right Of Way Plan 71204, District Lot 403 Group 1
New Westminster District Plan 44493 (007-476-655)
Lot 3 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 17222 (010-263-071)
Parcel "M" (Reference Plan 681) District Lot 403 Group 1 New Westminster District
(012-943-908)
Parcel "One" (Explanatory Plan 8328) of Parcel "J" (Reference Plan 3829) Except:
Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan 71204; District Lots 402 And 403 Group 1 New
Westminster District (012-944-157)
Parcel "D" (Reference Plan 1017) South West Quarter Section 16 Township 12 New
Westminster District (013-301-080)
Parcel "L" (Reference Plan 3957) of Parcel "J" (Reference Plan 3829), Except: Firstly :
Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan 4834; Secondly: Part Lying South of Road Shown
on Statutory Right of Way Plan 4834; Thirdly : Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan
71204; District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District (014-508-397)
and
Part (.015 Acres Plan 3041) of Parcel J (Reference Plan 3829) District Lot 403
Group 1 New Westminster District (023-360-488)
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 943, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding and removing Conservation as shown.
4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of ,20 .
___________________________________ _____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
TELOSKY AVE.OLUND233A ST.AVE.
T
E
L
O
S
K
Y
A
V
E
.COTTONWO OD DR.232 ST.113
113 AVE.HARRISON ST.KANAKA WAY232 ST.114A AVE.
CR
E
S
116 AV
E.
113 AVE.
PL
.
L
O
U
G
H
E
E
D
H
IG
HW
A
Y
ROADGI
L
L
I
S228 ST.230 ST.BURNETT ST.COTTONWO OD DR.HARRISON ST.FISHER ST.114
A
A
V
E
.
HANE
Y
B
Y
P
A
S
S 232 ST.LOUGHEED H
IGHWAY
HAN
E
Y
B
Y
P
A
S
S
KANAKA WAY
´
SCALE 1:6,000
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
Conservation and Urban Residential
7331-2017942
Urban ResidentialCommercial ConservationPark
TELOSKY AVE.OLUND233A ST.AVE.
T
E
L
O
S
K
Y
A
V
E
.COTTONWO OD DR.232 ST.113
113 AVE.HARRISON ST.KANAKA WAY232 ST.114A AVE.
CR
E
S
116 AV
E.
113 AVE.
PL
.
L
O
U
G
H
E
E
D
H
IG
HW
A
Y
ROADGI
L
L
I
S228 ST.230 ST.BURNETT ST.COTTONWO OD DR.HARRISON ST.FISHER ST.114
A
A
V
E
.
HANE
Y
B
Y
P
A
S
S 232 ST.LOUGHEED H
IGHWAY
HAN
E
Y
B
Y
P
A
S
S
KANAKA
W
A
Y
´
SCALE 1:6,000
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. 7331-2017Map No. 943Purpose: To Amend Schedule C as shown
To Remove from Conservation To Add To Conservation
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7183-2015
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7183-2015."
2.PART 7 COMMERCIAL ZONES, SECTION 701 NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMERCIAL: C-1, SUB-
SECTION 1. PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES is amended by adding the new clause i) as follows:
i)The following uses are permitted specific to the area outlined in heavy black line on
Schedule “A” a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw:
i.Apartment Use;
ii.Assembly, including Daycare;
iii.Business Services;
iv. Civic;
v.Financial Services;
vi. Indoor Commercial Recreation;
vii. Liquor Primary Establishments;
viii. Professional Services; and
ix.Retail Sales, excluding Highway Commercial Use.
3.PART 7 COMMERCIAL ZONES, SECTION 701 NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMERCIAL: C-1, SUB-
SECTION 8. OTHER REGULATIONS is amended by adding the new Section following section
numbered sequentially as follows:
Notwithstanding the regulations contained in this part, the area outlined in heavy
black line on Schedule “A” a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this
Bylaw, the following regulations apply:
i.Lot coverage of all buildings and structures shall not exceed 50%;
ii.No building or structure shall exceed a height of 12.0 metres or 3 storeys;
iii.Subject to Section 403 (7) Visual Clearance at Intersections, no building or
structure hall be sited less than 3.0 metres from any lot line;
iv. The gross floor area of:
(a) all principal buildings and structures together shall not exceed 3,350 square
metres; and
(b) all ground floor commercial uses shall not exceed 1,093 square metres;
v.Apartment residential use:
(c) shall be limited exclusively to the storeys above the first storey;
(d) shall be the only use in a storey so used;
(e)shall be located within a building above all storeys which are used for a non-
residential principal use;
(f) shall have separate and independent access;
(g) shall provide indoor amenity space in the amount of 3.0 square metres per
unit; and
APPENDIX D
2
(h) may have associated non-habitable spaces, including lobbies, meeting
rooms, amenity areas, bicycle and other storage areas, on the first storey or
underground.
4. Those parcel (s) or tract (s) of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 31 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595
(002-818-451)
Lot 32 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595
(002-818-477)
Lot 27 Except: Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan 71204; District Lot 403 Group 1
New Westminster District Plan 44493 (007-476-621)
Lot 28 Except Part in Highway Plan 71204, District Lot 403 Group 1 New
Westminster District Plan 44493 (007-476-647)
Lot 29, Except: Part on Statutory Right Of Way Plan 71204, District Lot 403 Group 1
New Westminster District Plan 44493 (007-476-655)
Lot 3 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 17222 (010-263-071)
Parcel "M" (Reference Plan 681) District Lot 403 Group 1 New Westminster District
(012-943-908)
Parcel "One" (Explanatory Plan 8328) of Parcel "J" (Reference Plan 3829) Except:
Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan 71204; District Lots 402 And 403 Group 1 New
Westminster District (012-944-157)
Parcel "D" (Reference Plan 1017) South West Quarter Section 16 Township 12 New
Westminster District (013-301-080)
Parcel "L" (Reference Plan 3957) of Parcel "J" (Reference Plan 3829), Except: Firstly :
Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan 4834; Secondly: Part Lying South of Road Shown
on Statutory Right of Way Plan 4834; Thirdly : Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan
71204; District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District (014-508-397)
Part (.015 Acres Plan 3041) of Parcel J (Reference Plan 3829) District Lot 403 Group
1 New Westminster District (023-360-488)
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1649 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to R-2 (Urban Residential District), RM-1
(Townhouse Residential) and C-1 (Neighbourhhood Commercial); and
3
5. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are
hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 24th day of November, 2015.
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of
, 20
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
DATE: May 10, 2017
Shcedule A
BY: DT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TELOSKY AVE.OLUNDAVE.
TE
L
O
S
K
Y
A
V
E
.113HARRISON ST.CR
E
S
PL
.
GI
L
L
I
S
230 ST.HARRISON ST.HANE
Y
B
Y
P
A
S
S 2305411255 2290723023229061125
6
113
7
4
2289711422
1129
0
112
9
1 230271138
6
23035228482301923021
11
3
4
8
11
3
2
4
23084
113
0
5
11286
2
3
0
4
3
11384
11282 229052286023151113
5
222895 1139
4
1136
0
2300
9
11274
23
0
3
9
23007
2289411310
2
2
8
9
3
11265 22852113
7
322882 1139
822866
11275
112
9
9 2301311305
229082289622878113
7
7
1126
2
11397
113
9
1
11271 230052286522891
23031
11445
1139
022836
112
9
4
113
0
1
11266
11391
111252301711279
22892
231442290323044228722289011278
2
3
0
1
1
22820113
8
7
1128
3
1139
222830
113
0
9 230152303422894112
8
7
23089
11255
113
9
523003
11
3
3
022812 228892284211270
11
3
4
0
22853112
9
5 228931136
8
1139
9
20
2
14
11
5
324
11
2718
303130
24
14
Rem.
CP
16
27
PARK
2517
28
21
2
9
4
1
19
9
23
29
6
24
1 10
6
5
10
4
17
5
13
A
3
3
36
37
Rem 12632
Rem. 27
27
1
Pcl. 1
Rem J
38
1
2418
Rem. 28
9
10
20
M
22
2
11
31
25
29
17
1
20
2318
8
40
10
19
23
18
32
21
34
2
12
2
3
24
25
7
9
4
17
31
11
15
13
22
A
6
8
15
6
8
23
9
22
5
4
1
2
15
27
Rem 1
13
3
3
10
5
26
7
2
1
4
26
5
16
20
Rem. 29
16
21
16
6
12
10
7
12
22
28
19
8
26
PARK
35
39 Rem L2
Rem
1282
8
1
252910
Park
14
12
33
15
14
11
13
7
3
9
19
13
2
BCP 34229
P 71904P
7
6
0
1
6
P 69693P 44493
RP 3829
NWS 2199RP 3957LMP 1873P 7104RP 681EP 8328
NW
S
2
6
1
7
P 61595P 69693P 61595
P 71204
LMS 4035
LMP 25825
P 44493P 71904P 14624
P 14624
EP 10002P
6
9
6
9
3
P 6
3
4
2
8
P 7720
P 14624 P 83404P 14624
LMP
12402
P 9
0
8 P 69693BCP 33406
LMS 421
P 71204P 69693P
7
1
9
0
4
LMP 1873P 44493cEP 14217 P 71904(EPS 641)BCP 34230P
7
1
9
0
4
LMS 1362
BCP 32785
P 76016HARRISON STOL
U
N
D
C
R
E
S
23
0
S
T
113 AVE
TELOSKY AVE
G
I
L
L
I
S
P
L
T
E
L
O
S
K
Y
A
V
E
HARRISON STLOUGHEED HWYLOUGHEED HWY232 STHAN
E
Y
B
Y
P
A
S
S
HANE
Y
B
Y
P
A
S
S
HA
N
E
Y
B
Y
P
A
S
S
´
Scale: 1:3,500
Bylaw No. 7183-2015
Schedule "A"
C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial)
TELOSKY AVE.OLUND233A ST.AVE.
T
E
L
O
S
K
Y
A
V
E
.COTTONWO OD DR.232 ST.113
113 AVE.HARRISON ST.KANAKA WAY232 ST.114A AVE.
CR
E
S
116 AV
E.
113 AVE.
PL
.
L
O
U
G
H
E
E
D
H
IG
HW
A
Y
ROADGI
L
L
I
S228 ST.230 ST.BURNETT ST.COTTONWO OD DR.HARRISON ST.FISHER ST.114
A
A
V
E
.
HANE
Y
B
Y
P
A
S
S 2305411481
11285
11358
11255 229072327011538
2283311448
1128
2
/
8
4 23023229061125
6
113
7
4
2289711422
11420
1129
0
112
9
1 2302711540
1138
6
230352284823019 114
4
22302111438
11
3
4
8
11
3
2
4
11528
23084
11426
2317522817113
0
5
11
4
3
8
11286
2
3
0
4
3
11384
11252
11282
11503
2328022905228102286011430
23151113
5
222895 1139
4
11534
1136
0
2334311492 2300
9
11274
11261
23
0
3
9
23007
2289411310
11294228
04
114
8
0
2
2
8
9
3
11490
11265 22852113
7
322882
11282
1139
8228661151611464
1153222808
2282911528
11275
11428
11497
23336112
9
9 2301311305
11520
229082289622878113
7
7
11327
1126
2
11397
113
9
1
11299
11271
11494
11471
2300511420
11488 2286522891
23031
11445
1139
0 1143011536
2283622
9
5
0
112
9
42284511490
113
0
1
11383
11266
11391
2315011125
11298 230171127922821
11229228371150622849 11
4
3
4
11524
22892
23144
11519
11484
229032323311510
23044228722289011278
11352
2
3
0
1
1
22820113
8
722806
1128
3
1139
222830
113
0
9 230152281211355
11375 230342289411318 112
8
7 228411127
8
23089 2329011372
11255
11495
113
9
523003
11
3
3
0
11508
228122288911313 2284211496
11270
11
3
4
0
11332
1126
2
11502
228532282511458
112
9
5 228931136
8
232811139
9
17
9
PT. 1
24
20
1
PARK
2
14
V
11314
21
22
1
5
16
321
11
4
8
B
2718
303130
18
5
24
14
11
Rem.
CP
16
27
PARK
6
5
PARK2517
28
21
4
2
9
Rem 1
4
1
19
LOT S
2
4
9
4
7
11
23
29
6
24
1
13
10
6
5
10
4
17
9
5
13
A
1
3
8
3
36
37
CP
PARK
6
Rem 1
12
15
2632
PARK
27
Rem. 27
1
7
Pcl. 1
Rem J
38
1
247
PARK
18
19
20
Rem. 28
3
A
Rem 28
9
10
Rem 21
22
M
Pcl. A
20
2
4
11
31
13
10
25
29
17
6
1
8
20 8
2318
8
40
10
A
25
19
12
23
18
Pcl. 1
32
21
34
2
12
12
2
3
Pcl. A
24
25
7
9
1
4
17
31
11
15
13
22
A
6
8
15
6
8
2
23
9
3
22
5
1
4
2
5
15
A
27
Rem 1
132B
3
D
11
1
71
Rem A
3
10
5
26
7
21
2
4
26
10
5
16
PARK
20
Rem. 29
16
2
21
16
64
12
3
10
7
12
A
5
22
11
28
19
8
U
26
PARK
1
12
35
39 Rem LRem 14
2
Rem
1282
3
8
1
9
25
23
1
2910
Park
14
12
33
15
14
7
11
13
10
7
3
5
9
Rem.19
13
2
P 71204
BCS 126
BCP 34229
PLAN 22158
LMS 1184
LMP 11097P 71904P
7
6
0
1
6
LMP 36190P 69693LMP 5486
BCS 3503
P 44493
LMP 36926
P 6981
LMP 2118
RP 3829
NWS 2199RP 3957LMP 1873
LMS 2114
P 7104P 9688RP 681EP 8328
P 1
9
7
5
0
NW
S
2
6
1
7
P 61595
LMS 4224P 69693P 61595LMS 3737P 71204
P 83811
RP 3633
LMS 4035
LMP 25825
LMP
3
4
9
3
8
P 44493P 71904P 14624
LMP 36954
BCS 2464
RP 3608
P 14624
EP 10002
P
6
9
6
9
3
EPP 62728
LMS 3147
LMP 39046P 6
3
4
2
8
P 7720
P 25975
BCP 43448
P 14624 P 83404BCS 189
RP 1017
P 71276
P 14624
LMP
12402P 58090BCP 25353
BCP 43450
P 9
0
8 P 69693LMP 34625
BCP 33406
P 809
P 87466
BCS 4083P 23261LMS 421
LMP 34938
LMP 36190
LMP 12216
P 9688LMP 30825
P 71204
LMP 12402P 69693LMP 10788
P
7
1
9
0
4
LMS 1391
BCS 599
LMP 1873P 44493
P 19750
NWS 3409
P 17222cEP 14217 P 71904LMS 3157
(EPS 641)
P 46383P 9688BCP 34230P
7
1
9
0
4
LMS 1362
NWS 2885
LMS
1
2
1
8
P 72332BCP 32785
P 76016LMS 3295
LMP 39046
232 ST.LOUGHEED H
IGHWAY
HAN
E
Y
B
Y
P
A
S
S
KANAKA WAY
´
SCALE 1:6,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) R-2 (Urban Residential District)
7183-20151649
C-1 (Neighbourhood Commercial)P-1 (Park and School)
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7332-2017
A Bylaw to authorize the City of Maple Ridge to enter into a Housing Agreement for
23070 Lougheed Highway
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 483 of the Local Government Act, R.S.B.C 1996, c. 323, as
amended, Council may, by bylaw, enter into a housing agreement under that Section;
AND WHEREAS, Council and Polygon Development 309 Ltd. wish to enter into a housing
agreement for the subject property at about 23070 Lougheed Highway;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, in open meeting
assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS :
1.This Bylaw may be cited as “23070 Lougheed Highway Housing Agreement Bylaw No.
7332-2017”.
2.By this Bylaw Council authorizes the City to enter into a housing agreement with
Polygon Development 309 Ltd. in respect to the following land:
Lot 31 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595 (002-
818-451);
Lot 32 District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 61595; (002-
818-477); and
Parcel "L" (Reference Plan 3957) of Parcel "J" (Reference Plan 3829), Except: Firstly :
Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan 4834; Secondly: Part Lying South of Road Shown
on Statutory Right of Way Plan 4834; Thirdly : Part on Statutory Right of Way Plan
71204; District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District (014-508-397)
3.The Mayor and Corporate Officer are authorized to execute the housing agreement and
all incidental instruments on behalf of the City of Maple Ridge.
4.Schedule “1”, attached to this Bylaw, is incorporated into and forms part of this
Bylaw.
APPENDIX E
5. This bylaw shall take effect as of the date of adoption hereof.
READ a first time the ___ day of ____________, 20__.
READ a second time the ___ day of ____________, 20__.
READ a third time the ___ day of ____________, 20__.
ADOPTED the ___ day of __________, 20__.
-
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1
Schedule “1”
2015 - 297 – RZ
Rental and Adaptive Units Only [Housing Agreement]
THIS AGREEMENT dated for reference the ____ day of ______, 2017
BETWEEN:
LAWYER TO PROVIDE
(hereinafter called the "Covenantor")
OF THE FIRST PART
AND:
THE CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE, a Municipal Corporation under the Local Government Act,
Chapter 290 of the Revised Statutes of British Columbia, 1979, having its municipal offices at
11995 Haney Place, in the City of Maple Ridge, in the Province of British Columbia (V2X 6A9)
(hereinafter called the "City")
OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS:
A. The Covenantor is the registered owner of or has an equity of redemption in certain
lands situate in the City of Maple Ridge in the Province of British Columbia, and more
particularly known and described as:
LAWYER TO PROVIDE
(hereinafter called the "Lands")
B. The City wishes to provide a range of housing options within its jurisdiction.
C. The Covenantor proposes to provide a minimum of 24 apartment dwelling units as rental
housing, of which a minimum of one-third will also be adaptive housing for aging in
place in accordance with the SaferHome Standards, attached as Schedule A, and in
accordance with Section 3.8.5 Adaptive Dwelling Units of the British Columbia Building
Code, as amended.
D. The Covenantor and the City wish to enter into this Agreement to restrict the use of
housing units to be constructed on the Lands, on the terms and conditions of this
Agreement, to have effect as both a covenant under section 219 of the Land Title Act
and a housing agreement under section 483 of the Local Government Act.
E. The City has adopted a bylaw under Section 483 of the Local Government Act to
authorize this Agreement as a housing agreement.
2
NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the premises and the covenants herein
contained, the payment of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) paid by the City to the Covenantor,
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties covenant and agree, pursuant to section 905 of the Local
Government Act and section 219 of the Land Title Act (British Columbia) as follows:
Definitions
1. In this Agreement:
(a) “Dwelling Units” means all residential dwelling units located or to be located on
the Lands whether those dwelling units are lots or parcels, or parts or portions
thereof, into which ownership or right of possession or occupation of the Lands
may be subdivided (hereinafter defined) and includes single family detached
dwellings, duplexes, townhouses, auxiliary residential dwelling units, rental
apartments and strata lots in a building strata plan;
(b) “Lands” means the land described in Item 2 of the General Instrument - Part 1
and any part, including a building or a portion of a building, into which said land
is subdivided;
(c) “Subdivide” means to divide, apportion, consolidate or subdivide the Land, or
the ownership or right to possession or occupation of the Land into two or more
lots, parcels, parts, portions or shares, whether by plan, descriptive words or
otherwise, under the Land Title Act, or otherwise, and includes the creation,
conversion, organization or development of “cooperative units” or “shared
interest in land” as defined in the Real Estate Act;
(d) “Adaptive Housing” means dwelling units designed and built in compliance with
the SaferHome Standards, attached as Schedule A, and in accordance with
Section 3.8.5 Adaptive Dwelling Units of the British Columbia Building Code.
Use and Occupancy Restrictions
2. All Dwelling Units on the Lands, shall only be used to provide rental accommodation and
shall remain as rental accommodation in perpetuity.
3. All Dwelling Units on the Lands, shall be rented only on a month to month basis or under
a residential tenancy agreement having a fixed term not exceeding three years,
including any rights of renewal.
4. No Dwelling Unit may be occupied except by an individual who occupies pursuant to a
rental agreement established in section 3.
Adaptive Housing Units
5. A minimum of one third (1/3) of all the Dwelling Units on the Lands shall be designed as
adaptive dwelling units in compliance with the SaferHome Standards, attached as
Schedule A, and in accordance with Section 3.8.5 Adaptive Dwelling Units of the British
Columbia Building Code.
Unit Mix
6. The following mix of units shall to be provided:
3
(a) 42% (a minimum of 10 units) one bedroom units;
(b) 25% (minimum 6 units) two bedroom units; and
(c) 33% (minimum 8 units) of three bedroom units.
7. Minor adjustment to the mix may be requested in writing and approved by the Director of
Planning or their delegate
Subdivision Restrictions
8. The Lands shall not be Subdivided, except by means of a strata plan under the Strata
Property Act that includes all of the Dwelling Units within a single strata lot.
Notice to Buyers
9. The Covenantor will provide notice of this Agreement to any person or persons intending
to purchase a Dwelling Unit prior to any person entering into an agreement of purchase
and sale, agreement for sale, or option or similar right to purchase.
Strata Bylaws
10. The initial bylaws of the strata corporation formed upon the subdivision of the Lands
under the Strata Property Act shall not prevent, restrict or abridge any of the Rental
Dwelling Units on the Lands from being used as rental accommodation.
11. This Agreement shall be binding upon all strata corporations. Any strata corporation
bylaw or rule which prevents, restricts or abridges the right to use any of the Dwelling
Units as rental accommodations shall have no force or effect.
12. The Owner Developer or the Strata Corporation shall not pass any bylaw or establish a
rule preventing, restricting or abridging any of the Rental Dwelling Units on the Lands
from being used as rental accommodation.
Voting
13. No Strata Unit owner, nor any tenant or mortgagee thereof, shall vote for any strata
corporation bylaw purporting to prevent, restrict or abridge any of the Rental Dwelling
Units on the Lands from being used as rental accommodation.
Specific Performance
14. The Covenantor agrees that because of the public interest in ensuring that all of the
matters described in this Agreement are complied with, the public interest strongly
favours the award of a prohibitory or mandatory injunction, or an order for specific
performance or other specific relief, by the Supreme Court of British Columbia at the
instance of the City, in the event of an actual or threatened breach of this Agreement.
Notice of Housing Agreement
15. For clarity, the Covenantor acknowledges and agrees that:
(a) this Agreement constitutes both a covenant under section 219 of the Land Title
Act and a housing agreement entered into under section 905 of the Local
Government Act;
4
(b) the City is required to file a notice of housing agreement in the Land Title Office
against title to the Lands; and
(c) once such a notice is filed, this Agreement binds all persons who acquire an
interest in the Lands as a housing agreement under section 905 of the Local
Government Act.
No Obligation to Enforce
16. The rights given to the City by this Agreement are permissive only and nothing in this
Agreement imposes any legal duty of any kind on the City to anyone, or obliges the City
to enforce this Agreement, to perform any act or to incur any expense in respect of this
Agreement.
No Effect on Laws or Powers
17. This Agreement does not:
(a) affect or limit the discretion, rights duties or powers of the City or the approving
officer for the City under the common law or any statute, bylaw or other
enactment nor does this Agreement date or give rise to, nor do the parties intend
this Agreement to create, any implied obligations concerning such discretionary
rights, duties or powers;
(b) affect or limit the common law or any statute, bylaw or other enactment
applying to the Lands; or
(c) relieve the owner from complying with any common law or any statute,
regulation, bylaw or other enactment.
Indemnity
18. The Covenantor hereby releases the City, and indemnifies and saves the City harmless,
from and against any and all actions, causes of actions, suits, claims (including claims
for injurious affection), cost (including legal fees and disbursements), expenses, debts,
demands, losses (including economic loss) and liabilities of whatsoever kind arising out
of or in any way due or relating to the granting or existence of this Agreement, the
restrictions or obligations contained in this Agreement or the performance or non-
performance by the Covenantor of this Agreement that the City is or may become liable
for, incur or suffer.
Priority
19. The Covenantor will do everything necessary, at the Covenantor’s expense, to ensure
that this Agreement is registered against title to the Lands in priority to all liens, charges
and encumbrances registered or pending registration against title to the Lands, save
and except those specifically approved in writing by the City and those in favour of the
City.
Waiver
20. An alleged waiver of any breach of this Agreement is effective only if it is an express
waiver in writing of the breach. A waiver of a breach of this Agreement does not operate
as a wavier of any other breach of this Agreement.
5
Interpretation
21. In this Agreement:
(a) reference to the singular includes a reference to the plural, and vice versa,
unless the context requires otherwise;
(b) reference to a particular numbered section or article, or to a particular lettered
Schedule, is a reference to the correspondingly numbered or lettered article,
section or Schedule of this Agreement;
(c) article and section headings have been inserted for ease of reference only and
are not to be used in interpreting this Agreement;
(d) the word “enactment” has the meaning given to it in the Interpretation Act
(British Columbia) on the reference date of this Agreement;
(e) reference to any enactment is a reference to that enactment as consolidated,
revised, amended, re-enacted or replace, unless otherwise expressly provided;
(f) reference to “party” or the “parties” is a reference to a party, or the parties, to this
Agreement and their respective successors, assigns, trustees, administrators
and receivers;
(g) time is of the essence; and
(h) reference to a “day”, “month” or “year” is a reference to a calendar day,
calendar month, or calendar year unless otherwise expressly provided.
Further Acts
22. The Covenantor will do everything reasonably necessary to give effect to the intent of
this Agreement, including execution of further instruments.
Severance
23. If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court
having the jurisdiction to do so, that part is to be considered to have been severed from
the rest of this Agreement and the rest of this Agreement remains in force unaffected by
that holding or by the severance of that part.
No Other Agreements
24. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties regarding its subject and it
terminates and supersedes all other agreements and arrangements regarding its
subject.
Enurement
25. This Agreement binds the parties to it and their respective successors, heirs, executors
and administrators.
6
Deed and Contract
26. By executing and delivering this Agreement each of the parties intends to create both a
contract and a deed executed and delivered under seal.
______________________
. by its authorized signatories
________________________________
________________________________
THE CORPORATE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION
OF THE CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE was hereto
affixed in the presence of:
________________________________
MAYOR
________________________________
CORPORATE OFFICER
In Amanda
7
Schedule “A”
The SAFERhome Standards Criteria
For Multi-Family Attached
1. All exterior thresholds are flush.
2. Interior thresholds meet minimal code constraints.
3. Bath and shower controls off set from centre, roughly 1/2 way between the historic centre
location and the outside edge of the shower or tub enclosure.
4. Pressure/temperature control valves on all shower faucets .
5. 2"x12" block lumber in all washroom tub, shower, and toilet locations.
6. Waste pipes brought in at 12-14" to the centre of the pipe from floor level.
7. Cabinets underneath sinks easily removable.
8. Doors a minimum of 34" wide but should ideally be 36".
9. Hallways and stairways a minimum of 40" wide but should ideally be 42" wide, passage ways
and pinch points like doors should be 36".
10. Light switches 42" to the centre of the electrical box from the finished floor.
11. Receptacles 18" to the centre of the electrical box from the finished floor.
12. Electrical receptacles placed as follows:
- Beside windows, especially where draperies or blinds may be installed.
- Top and bottom of stairways
- Beside the toilet
- Above external doors (outside and inside) - On front face of kitchen counter
- At Node Zero Location (the communications control centre for smart home options) where
all the house wiring meets in one place.
13. Larger grey electrical boxes utilized .
14. Four-plex receptacles in master bedroom, home office.
15. Level 5 (4 pair) telephone pre-wire to all areas returning to one central area (Node Zero).
16. RG-6 coaxial cable runs returning to one central area (Node Zero).
17. All low-voltage runs returning to one central area (Node Zero).
18. Walls at the top of stairs reinforced with 2"x12" at 36" to centre.
19. Either: allowance made for elevator in stacked closets or make the staircase 42" wide.
Source: saferhome_manual_final_2009-11-12
TERMS OF INSTRUMENT – PART 2
SECTION 219 COVENANT – NO BUILD
2015-297-RZ
THIS AGREEMENT dated for reference the ______ day of __________, 2017 is
BETWEEN:
POLYGON DEVELOPMENT 309 LTD.
900 – 1333 West Broadway
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3R8
(the “Covenantor”)
AND:
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
11995 Haney Place
Maple Ridge, British Columbia, V2X 6A9
(the “City”)
WHEREAS:
A.The Covenantor is the registered owner in fee simple of certain lands in the City
of Maple Ridge, British Columbia which are legally described in Item 2 of the
Land Title Act (British Columbia) Form C to which these terms are attached and
which forms part of this Agreement (the “Lands”).
B.The Covenantor is the registered owner in fee simple of certain lands in the City
of Maple Ridge, British Columbia which are legally described as:
PID: NPA
Lot A District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District
Plan EPP________;
PID: NPA
Lot B District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District
Plan EPP________;
PID: NPA
Lot C District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District
Plan EPP________;
PID: NPA
Lot H District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District
Plan EPP________; and
APPENDIX F
PID: NPA
Lot I District Lots 402 and 403 Group 1 New Westminster District
Plan EPP________,
(the “Adjacent Lands”)
C. The Covenantor wishes to construct certain a number residential and mixed use
developments on the Lands and the Adjacent Lands which developments will be
constructed in two phases.
D. The developments on the Lands will be the second phase of the overall
development and will be designed generally in accordance with the
supplementary design guidelines (the “Design Guidelines”) attached as
Schedule “A” hereto.
E. Section 219 of the Land Title Act provides, inter alia, that a covenant, whether of
a negative or positive nature, may be registered as a charge against the title to
the land, in favour of the municipality or the Crown, and that the covenant is
enforceable against the Covenantor and the successors in title of the
Covenantor.
F. A covenant under Section 219 of the Land Title Act may include provisions in
respect of the use of land, the use of a building on or to be erected on lands; that
land is to be built on in accordance with the covenant, is not to be built on except
in accordance with that covenant or is not to be built on; that land is not to be
subdivided unless in accordance with the covenant or is not to be subdivided.
G. The Covenantor agrees to the restrictions in the use of the Lands on the terms
and conditions herein provided for.
NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH THAT pursuant to Section 219
of the Land Title Act, and in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants and
agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration and the sum
of One Dollar ($1.00) now paid by the City to the Covenantor (the receipt and
sufficiency whereof is hereby acknowledged), the parties hereto covenant and agree
that the Lands shall not be used or built on except in accordance with this Covenant as
follows:
1. THE COVENANTOR COVENANTS AND AGREES with the City that:
a) the Design Guidelines set out the conceptual layout and phasing of all
development on the Lands and the Adjacent Lands;
b) no construction of, additions to or alterations in any manner to any
building(s), structure(s) or dwelling(s) shall be permitted other than that
approved in writing by the City, whether such building(s), structure(s) or
dwelling(s) are sited on the Lands at the time of entering into this
Agreement or proposed as new building(s), structure(s) or dwelling(s) after
the time of entering into this Agreement until such time as the City has
issued a development permit for the Lands; and
c) the Covenantor shall not sell, transfer, convey, assign or lease any part of
its interest in the Lands or any portion thereof until the Covenantor
provides notice (whether written or otherwise) to each prospective
purchaser, purchaser or lessee thereof, as the case may be, of the terms
and conditions herein provided for.
2. IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD, agreed and declared by and between the
parties hereto that:
a) nothing contained or implied herein shall in any way restrict or abrogate
and shall not be deemed to restrict or abrogate, the rights and powers of
the City in the exercise of its functions under any public and private
statutes, by-laws, orders and regulations, in its absolute discretion, and in
accordance with its lawful powers and duties;
b) the burden of the covenants herein provided for shall run with the Lands
and will be personal and binding upon the Covenantor during the
Covenantor’s seisen of or ownership of any interest in the Lands;
c) notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Covenantor shall not be
liable under any breach of any covenants and agreements contained
herein after the Covenantor ceases to have any further interest in the
Lands;
d) the Covenantor will deliver, after execution hereof, this Agreement to th e
City in a form acceptable as a Section 219 Covenant and concurrently
such instruments of priority as may be necessary to give this Agreement
priority over all financial charges and encumbrances which may have
been registered against the title to the Lands at the time of submitting this
Agreement for registration in the applicable Land Title Office, save and
except those specifically approved in writing by the City or in favour of the
City;
e) the fee simple estate in and to the Lands will not pass or vest in the City
under or by virtue of these presents and the Covenantor may fully use and
enjoy the Lands except only for the requirements provided for in this
Agreement;
f) the Covenantor and its successors and assigns shall at all times indemnify
and save harmless the City from and against all claims, demands, actions,
suits, loss, costs, fines, penalties, charges, damages and expenses
including legal fees and litigation expenses whatsoever which the City
may incur, suffer or be put to arising out of or in connection with any
breach of any covenant or agreement on the part of the Covenantor
contained in this Agreement;
g) the covenants and agreements on the part of the Covenantor and herein
provided for have been made by the Covenantor as contractual
obligations as well as having been made pursuant to Section 219 and as
such will be binding on the Covenantor;
h) nothing herein provided for shall be deemed to constitute waivers of any
lawful requirements with which the Covenantor would otherwise be
obligated to comply with;
i) no amendment of, addition to, or discharge of this Agreement shall be
binding upon the parties hereto unless it is in writing and executed by the
parties hereto;
j) if any provision provided for in this Agreement is for any reason held to be
invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or
unenforceability will not affect any other provision of this Agreement which
shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provisions
had never been contained therein and such other provisions shall be
enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law;
k) the City, in addition to its rights under this Agreement or at law, will be
entitled to all equitable remedies, including specific performance,
injunction and/or declaratory relief, to enforce its rights under this
Agreement;
l) the Covenantor shall pay for the preparation and registration, if applicable,
of this Agreement together with any concurrent instruments of priority as
herein provided for and any amendment, addition or discharge thereof;
m) wherever the singular, masculine or neuter is used herein, the same shall
be construed as meaning the plural, feminine or the body corporate or
politic according to the context in which it is used;
n) the parties hereto shall do and cause to be done all things and execute
and cause to be executed all documents which may be necessary to give
proper effect to the intention of this Agreement;
o) this Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the
Covenantor, the City and their respective successors and assigns; and
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
day, month and year first above written.
Schedule “A”
Design Guidelines
Updated May 5 2017
SUPPLEMENTARY DESIGN GUIDELINES
Introduction
The goal of this master-planned community (See Figure 1 subject map) is to create a
vibrant, legible, complete village with a variety of housing choices, an active and safe
pedestrian realm, a suite of amenities, and a neighbourhood commercial facility.
Towards that end, these design guidelines are focused on creating a harmonious whole
of the three townhome communities and one mixed-use building making up the village.
The development concept these guidelines support is shown in the Figure 2. At the time
of rezoning, the site was subject to concurrent Development Permit approval for the
initial townhouse phase on Lots B+I. The subsequent townhouse phase on Lot E and
the commercial village on Lot C would be subject to subsequent Development Permit
applications.
The purpose of these supplementary guidelines is as follows:
1. To govern the subsequent townhouse and commercial phases to insure the
comprehensive nature of the design intent, layout and pedestrian connectivity is
achieved; and
2. To supplement and augment the guidelines governing the development of both
townhouse and the commercial phase with the applicable Development Permit
Area Guidelines contained in the Maple Ridge Official Community Plan:
a. 8.5 Commercial Development Permit Area Guidelines for the commercial
phase; and
b. 8.7 Multi-Family Development Permit Area Guidelines for the townhouse
phases.
The review process for Multiple Residential and Commercial Development Permits
includes submission to the Advisory Design Panel (ADP). The submission of each
phase for ADP review is to include an assessment against these Supplementary
Guidelines to insure the overall concept as well as the Guidelines contained herein are
carried through, coordinated and achieved in each phase.
This project is proposed to be developed over a period of time. The Director of Planning
or their designate may upon written request consider minor changes to these guidelines
consistent with the objects of the proposed master planned community and better
attainment of the guidelines contained herein.
1.0 Site plan
1.1 Follow Natural Topography
1.1.1 The site features a spectacular natural landform – a promontory
jutting from NW to SE towards the Fraser River.
1.1.2 This dramatic feature is to be celebrated, not destroyed, and sites
will be planned to avoid large-scale regrading.
1.1.3 Some regrading is unavoidable, but in general cutting and filling is to
be kept to the minimum necessary to make a site viable.
1.2 Doors on the Street
1.2.1 Frontages along the Municipal Road will have front yards with doors
opening to the street, where grading permits.
1.2.2 Appropriate unit types for this condition will feature inhabited space
on the level with the front door, not just garage.
1.3 Pedestrian Byways
1.3.1 Each site is to be planned with pedestrian and cycle permeability in
mind, substantially in accordance with Figure 2.
1.3.2 Pathways and trails should criss-cross each site as much as
possible, linking constructed and natural features together into a
comprehensive network.
1.3.3 The pedestrian and cycle path network is to be developed in lieu of
sidewalks on the strata roads
1.4 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)
1.4.1 Residential units will be configured to ensure maximum “eyes on the
street”.
1.4.2 Formal landscaped areas will be provided with sufficient illumination
(natural landscaped areas will not be bound by this requirement to
avoid despoiling their natural beauty).
1.4.3 Open spaces will be designed to avoid dark spots and concealed
areas.
1.5 Common Amenity Building
1.5.1 An amenity clubhouse containing a fitness studio, great room,
multipurpose room and two (2) guest suites will be constructed on
Lot E in the second phase of the project, as shown in Figure 2.
2.0 Open Space
2.1 Hierarchy of Open Spaces
2.1.1 Three orders of open space will be incorporated into the plan:
community-wide parks, central greens, and planted mews
2.2 First Order: Public Parks
2.2.1 The Active Public Park on Lot D and the “Tot Lot” on Lot H are for
the enjoyment of the general public.
2.3 Second Order: Central Greens located near the entries on Lots B+E.
2.3.1 Central Greens are smaller and more intimate and contain
functionality important for the day-to-day life of each community –
mail kiosks, visitor parking, etc.
2.4 Third Order: Planted Mews
2.4.1 Planted mews are to be deployed where topography permits, and
create linear green spaces lined on either side with front yards and
main entries to homes .
2.5 Nature trails
2.5.1 A series of nature trails through the adjacent ESA’s will be
incorporated into the overall site plan.
2.5.2 Onsite connections to the nature trails shall be provided that link
them seamlessly into the pedestrian realm of each project.
2.5.3 The conceptual trail system is shown in Figure 3.
2.6 Interconnectivity
2.6.1 Further to guideline 1.3 above, the onsite pedestrian byways and
nature trail system are meant to create a comprehensive,
interconnected network through the site, across Lougheed Highway
and to the adjacent neighourhoods and school facilities.
2.6.2 At the SE of the site, a Right of Way has been provided for the
future construction of a pedestrian and cycle flyover of the Haney
Bypass, providing access to Kanaka Park and the Fraser River. At
such time as it is built, this shall be integrated seamlessly into the
public nature trail system.
2.7 Common Amenity Outdoor Space
2.7.1 The Clubhouse from guideline 1.5 above, will have an outdoor
component consisting of a pool and hot tub, an outdoor seating
terrace and a barbecue.
2.8 Commercial/Rental Building Amenity Space
2.8.1 A south-facing plaza will be provided that offers outdoor seating,
which can be used in conjunction with a restaurant or café.
3.0 Architectural Character
3.1 Styles
3.1.1 The overall character of the development is to be “Craftsman,”
employing cedar (or cementitious) shingles as the principal material.
3.1.2 Each community is to have a distinctive variation of this style, with
elements of Arts and Crafts, Heritage Farmhouse, Queen Anne and
Contemporary Tudor all being acceptable influences.
3.2 Materials
3.2.1 The main materials for all the communities will be shingles and
cementitious board.
3.2.2 Other acceptable materials include: vinyl, wood, brick, stucco and
cultured stone
3.3 Colours
3.3.1 Each community will have a restrained colour palette in earth tones,
with punches of brighter colours for emphasis.
3.4 Common Amenity Building
3.4.1 The common amenity building will utilize a similar architectural style
as the townhomes, so as to bear a familial resemblance to them.
3.5 Commercial/Rental Building
3.5.1 The commercial/rental building will also be built in a similar style so
that the whole complex hangs together. However, the style needs to
be adapted to support the commercial usage.
3.5.2 In particular, the commercial/rental building and clubhouse will be
designed so as to be legible as a village core precinct at the entry to
the project.
4.0 Form and Massing
4.1 Forms Appropriate for Natural Topography
4.1.1 The topography shall determine the type of unit plan, rather than the
other way around.
4.1.2 Homes with raised back yards will be used on steep slopes with a
roadway on the low side.
4.1.3 Downhill homes with parking on the second level will be used on
steep slopes with a roadway on the uphill side.
4.1.4 Various types of homes may be deployed on more modest slopes
4.2 Measures to Minimize Mass
4.2.1 Along the interface with single family neighbourhoods, strategies
should be deployed to minimize the three-storey building mass
including: raised yards, end elevations facing single family, and low
slope roofs.
4.3 Roof slopes
4.3.1 All buildings will have sloping roofs to ensure harmony of forms; no
flat roofs will be incorporated on the main roofs, but can be used on
bays.
4.3.2 Roof slopes are to be between 3:12 and 8:12.
4.4 Roof overhangs
4.4.1 All two and three storey walls will have a minimum roof overhang of
2 ft (24”).
4.5 Front porches
4.5.1 Where homes have front yards, front porches will be incorporated to
ensure opportunities for neighbourly interaction.
4.6 Commercial/Rental Building and Common Amenity Building
4.6.1 These two buildings will be three storeys and designed in harmony
with one another so as create a legible village core.
5.0 Landscape Character
5.1 Monument Signs
5.1.1 Monument signs in stone or brick will be near the entry of each
project and will announce the project’s name and address.
5.1.2 These monuments may include such other elements as: lighting,
water features, trellises, seating areas and plantings.
5.2 Paving and Hardscape
5.2.1 Paving and hardscape shall be used to reinforce the architectural
design themes.
5.2.2 A variety of paving types, including unit pavers, cast-in place
concrete, and asphalt are acceptable.
5.2.3 Gravel and crusher dust are not acceptable paving materials in
onsite applications, but may be used on the nature trail system,
where appropriate.
5.3 Plantings and Softscape
5.3.1 In general, plantings should focus on native species, particularly
drought tolerant species.
5.3.2 In ornamental planting areas, introduced species are acceptable to
meet particular aesthetic goals
5.3.3 Plantings fronting the ESA’s, along with any habitat compensation
plantings, are to be 100% native species.
5.4 Playgrounds
5.4.1 In providing playgrounds for the community, various ages of children
must be considered, from toddlers to teenagers
5.4.2 Playgrounds should focus on natural play opportunities, including
logs and boulders for climbing and jumping.
5.5 Public Art
5.5.1 Near the main entry road to the project, a small plaza will be created
with hard and soft landscaping, seating, and a prominent piece of
public art.
5.5.2 The plaza will be covered by a public Right of Way to ensure access
by all and will be a feature that welcomes all to the community.
6.0 Sustainability
6.1 Rain gardens
6.1.1 Rain gardens, incorporating rocks and plantings, shall be provided in
appropriate locations to make a feature of the detention requirement
of Maple Ridge’s three tiered Storm Water Management scheme.
6.2 Bio Swales
6.2.1 Swales, both rocky and planted, shall be provided in appropriate
locations, both to conduct runoff water to the rain gardens, and also
to provide some detention capacity.
6.3 Retained trees
6.3.1 Specimen trees in key locations shall be retained to help preserve
the natural features of the site
6.4 Biodiversity
6.4.1 The various elements of plantings, rain gardens and bio swales shall
be deployed to enhance the biodiversity of the overall site and of
each project.
6.5 Electric Vehicle Charging
6.5.1 One (1) Electric Vehicle charging receptacle will be provided per
townhome, located in the garage.
6.5.2 Two (2) High Speed Electric Vehicle Chargers will be provided at the
Rental Commercial Building.
6.6 Water Efficiency
6.6.1 All homes will be provided with low-flow fixtures for water efficiency.
7.0 Other Design Matters
7.1 Rail Noise and Vibration
7.1.1 The recommendations of the “Guidelines for New Development in
Proximity to Railway Operations” prepared by the Federation of
Canadian Municipalities and the Railway Association of Canada will
be applied to this site.
7.2 Regional Park Connection
7.2.1 The final site plan and trail network plan for the development will
accommodate a future grade separated connection to regional park
lands south of the development site.
Figure 1
Figure 2
APPENDIX G
APPENDIX H
APPENDIX I
APPENDIX J
APPENDIX K
APPENDIX L
APPENDIX M
-1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2016-464-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7333-2017 and
Second Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7308-2017
20199 and 20185 McIvor Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 20199 McIvor Avenue,
from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential). The second property, located at 20185 McIvor Avenue, is currently and will remain
zoned RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). Together, the two subject properties
will permit subdivision into approximately nine RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density)
Residential) zoned lots. The property located at 20199 McIvor Avenue was excluded from the
Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) in 2003; however, it is currently designated Agricultural on Schedule
B of the Official Community Plan (OCP), and will require an amendment to:
Include the subject property, located at 20199 McIvor Avenue, within the Urban Area
Boundary; and
Change the land use designation from Agricultural to Urban Residential.
Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7308-2017 on February 14, 2017.
Pursuant with Council resolution, the application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution
(CAC) Program at a rate of $5,100 per lot, for an estimated amount of $45,900.00.
There is not sufficient suitable land for park dedication on the subject site and it is recommended
that Council require the developer to pay to the City an amount that equals 5% of the market value of
the land required for parkland purposes, as determined by an independent appraisal.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1)That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and
on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7333-2017 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a
Development Information Meeting (DIM), and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any
further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw;
2)That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7333-2017 be considered in conjunction with
the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
3)That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7333-2017 is consistent
with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
1104
- 2 -
4) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7333-2017 be given first and second
readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
5) That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7308-2017 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public
Hearing;
6) That Council require, as a condition of subdivision approval, the developer to pay to the City an
amount that equals 5% of the market value of the land, as determined by an independent
appraisal, in lieu of parkland dedication in accordance with Section 510 of the Local
Government Act; and,
7) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule "B";
ii) Consolidation of the subject properties;
iii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report and Floodplain Report,
which addresses the suitability of the subject properties for the proposed development;
iv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management;
v) Removal of existing buildings;
vi) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional
Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the
subject properties. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the
subject property is not a contaminated site; and
vii) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $45,900.00 be provided in keeping with the
Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions.
DISCUSSION:
1) Background Context:
Applicant: Platinum Projects Ltd.
Legal Descriptions: Lot 102 District Lot 263 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan
50054
Lot 40 District Lot 263 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan
BCP30587
OCP:
Existing: Agricultural, Urban Residential
Proposed: Urban Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) and
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
- 3 -
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Agriculture
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Agricultural
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Vacant and Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 0.54 ha (1.33 acres)
Access: McIvor Avenue and 201 Street
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
2) Background:
The subject properties are a combined area of 0.54 ha (1.33 acres) in size and are bound by
residential properties to the west, south and east, and Agricultural land to the north (see Appendices
A & B). The subject properties are relatively flat with some trees located near the McIvor Street
frontage, and along the east and west property boundaries. There is an existing house at 20199
McIvor Avenue that will require removal as part of final rezoning conditions. The second property at
20185 McIvor Avenue is currently vacant.
3) Project Description:
The applicant proposes to rezone the property located at 20199 McIvor Avenue, from RS-1 (One
Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). The second
property, located at 20185 McIvor Avenue, is already zoned RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium
Density) Residential), and will also form part of this rezoning application, to permit future subdivision
into approximately nine single family residential lots.
The Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) excluded the property located at 20199 McIvor Avenue in
2003 from the ALR. In addition, this property is designated “General Urban” in the Metro Vancouver
Regional Growth Strategy; therefore, Regional approvals are not required. The surrounding context
of the subject properties to the west, south and east are considered Urban Residential in the OCP.
The applicant intends to develop the subject properties in accordance with the Urban Residential
designation. Lands to the north, designated Agricultural, are currently being farmed for pasture
grass and hay. An agricultural buffer, in the form of a 1.2m high cast in place concrete retaining wall
will be provided between the proposed residential development to the south, and the agricultural
lands to the north.
- 4 -
4) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
One of the subject properties, located at 20199 McIvor Avenue, is currently designated Agricultural;
however, the property was excluded from the ALR in 2003. The adopted Metro Vancouver Regional
Growth Strategy identifies the subject property as ‘General Urban’ and ha s been placed within the
Region’s Urban Containment Boundary. The subject property is also within the Greater Vancouver
Sewerage and Drainage District’s Fraser Sewer Area, and is permitted to be serviced with the
municipal sanitary sewer; therefore, no Regional approvals are required.
The following OCP amendments are required to align the subject property with the Metro Vancouver
Regional Growth Strategy:
To include the subject property, located at 20199 McIvor Avenue, in the Urban Area
Boundary; and
To change the designation from Agricultural to Urban Residential (See Appendix C).
The property located at 20185 McIvor Avenue is currently designated Urban Residential in the OCP.
The current zone of RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) aligns with this
designation and the property will be combined with 20199 McIvor Avenue for future subdivision into
nine single family residential lots.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 20199 McIvor Avenue from RS-1
(One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) (see
Appendix D). The property located at 20185 McIvor Avenue is already zoned RS-1b (One Family
Urban (Medium Density) Residential), and will form part of the subject application. The combined
properties will then permit future subdivision into nine single family residential lots.
The minimum lot size for the current RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) zone is 668 m2 (7,191 ft²),
and the minimum lot size for the proposed RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
zone is 557 m2 (5,996 ft²).
Advisory Design Panel:
A Form and Character Development Permit is not required and therefore this application does not
need to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting was held at Laity View Elementary on May 4, 2017. Seven
people attended the meeting. A summary of the main comments and discussions with the
attendees was provided by the applicant and include the following main points:
The subject property will require fill, with concern from adjacent neighbours on how drainage
will impact their properties.
Questions regarding retaining wall height on the north and east property boundaries.
Concern over the type of fencing to be installed, specifically on the retaining wall.
Questions regarding siting of homes to rear property lines.
- 5 -
The following are provided in response to the issues raised by the public:
All drainage from the subject property will be directed to the Municipal storm system; each
lot will have its own catch basin.
The retaining wall height will not exceed 1.2 m and will consist of cast-in-place concrete.
Chain link fence will be located on top of the proposed retaining wall, with landscaping on
the residential side of the fence (proposed lot 1, north property boundary). Builder / future
homeowners will determine the type of fencing to be installed on adjacent lots, at a later
date.
Minimum rear setback for the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone
is 6m (20ft.).
Parkland Requirement:
As there are more than two additional lots proposed to be created, the developer will be required to
comply with the park dedication requirements of Section 510 of the Local Government Act prior to
subdivision approval.
For this project, there is no suitable land for park dedication on the subject properties and it is
therefore recommended that Council require the developer to to pay to the City an amount that
equals the market value of 5% of the land required for parkland purposes. The amount payable to
the City in lieu of park dedication must be derived by an independent appraisal at the developer’s
expense. Council consideration of the cash-in-lieu amount will be the subject of a future Council
report.
5) Agricultural Impact:
An Agricultural Impact Assessment, prepared by Madrone Environmental Services Ltd., was prepared
as part of the development application. The report indicates that the proposed retaining wall, fence
and landscaping will be an effective and practical buffer between the current agricultural use and
the proposed residential use. It was determined that a retaining wall is the preferred buffer option,
compared to the vegetated slope that is currently used west of the development site.
6) School District No. 42 Comments:
The School District has noted that the subject properties fall within the Fairview Elementary and
Westview Secondary school catchments. Actual numbers for the 2016-17 school year indicate that
Fairview Elementary is at 64% utilization, with 279 students. For secondary school enrollment
capacity, actual numbers for the 2016-17 school year indicate that Westview Secondary is at 54%
utilization, with 765 students. Therefore, there is available elementary and secondary school
capacity for the proposed development.
7) Intergovernmental Issues:
i) Local Government Act:
An amendment to the OCP requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to
adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 477 of the Local
Government Act. The amendment required for this application, to change the designation from
Agricultural to Urban Residential, is considered to be minor in nature as the subject property has
previously been excluded from the ALR and is designated ‘General Urban’ in the Metro Vancouver
Regional Growth Strategy. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing
procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an
- 6 -
adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial
Governments.
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal will require an OCP amendment, from Agricultural to Urban Residential,
for the property located at 20199 McIvor Avenue, to align with the Metro Vancouver Regional Growth
Strategy, and to align with the ALC’s decision to exclude the property from the ALR. The proposed
zoning to the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone complies with the Urban
Residential designation, and fits with the surrounding neighbourhood.
It is recommended that first and second reading be given to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7333-2017,
that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7308-2017, and that application 2016-
464-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing.
It is further recommended that Council require, as a condition of subdivision approval, the developer
to pay to the City an amount that equals 5% of the market value of the land, as determined by an
independent appraisal, in lieu of parkland dedication.
“Original signed by Adam Rieu”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adam Rieu
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7333-2017
Appendix D – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7308-2017
Appendix E – Proposed Subdivision Plan
DATE: Dec 16, 2016
2016-464-RZ
BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
´
Scale: 1:2,500
20185 & 20199 McIvor AveLegend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX A
DATE: Dec 16, 2016
2016-464-RZ
BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
´
Scale: 1:2,500
20185 & 20199 McIvor Ave
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2011
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7333-2017
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014
_______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule "B" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7333-2017."
2.Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 102 District Lot 263 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 50054
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 944, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, by amending the Urban Area Boundary as shown.
3. Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 102 District Lot 263 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 50054
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 945, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by re-designating to “Urban Residential” as
shown.
4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20 .
____________________________________________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
McIVOR AVE.
124 AVE.202A ST.202 ST.125 AVE
.
201 S
T.ALLISON ST.125 AVE
DAVE
N
P
O
R
T
D
R.
POWELL AVE.
202
8
51246712426
12
4
5
5
12409
12411
12407
12410
2028812402
12439 124691241612487 2027512
4
7
8
12404
20298202632027712481124932024712457
2018512425
12441
124
5
2
12440
12
4
4
8
12
4
7
5
12450
12396
12400
12429
12
4
5
6
12419
2027812455201392028312416 202022019212445
2032112408
1244
9
12
4
8
6
12382
12463
12
4
9
8
12383
12
4
6
1
12402
2014512
4
6
2
124
6
2 202202020212406
2023
5
203112026912402
12428
12461
12437
12495
12399
12491
12
4
9
7
12
4
7
9
12389
12451
12422 2027412420
12405
12401
20225
1246612425
12406
2032412421
12426/28
12421
1244
2 202431246
9
1248
5
12415
12448
12397
1248120111
12403 202131247412
4
9
6
12451
12392
12431
12400
12411
2
0
2
4
0
12476
12434
12486
12442
2
0
2
6
0
12
4
6
7
2019912398
12391
12
4
7
3
20205 2025112
4
7
0
38
17
43
6
15
33
103
44
48
B
25
32
5
2
46
39
84
40
9
33
Rem 1
1
50
28
11
66
11
2
35
5
28
12
1
12
6
47
4
24
9
36
35
5
34
7
A
23
29
65
17
14
27
11
16
187
88
13
104
30
34
15
19
26
2
1
22
4
12
51
18
87
14
37
PARK
6
9
3
67
44
26
2
102
31
1
7
21
8627
8
4140
83
31
1
39
3
49
6
Pcl. 1
43
20
89
13
37
3
4
32
PARK
7 10
10
2
25
6
8
45
45
5
36
16
42
8
10
13
85
5
29
3
42
38
Pcl. A
30
EPP 55981
P 20395EPP 55982 P 73431P 21555P 55583EP 17262
P 20395LMP 41518
P 42230P 21483P 73431
EPP 55982BCP 46775P 21483LMP 41518EPP 55982
P 73431
BCP 30587
EPP 62340P 21555LMP 41518BCP 30587
BCP 24827
EPP 55982P 20395LMP 42683
P 20395EPP 58146P 38722
LMP 41518P 42230
P 38722
BCP 30587
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No.
Purpose:To Amend the Urban Area Boundary as shown
7333-2017944
Exisitng UrbanArea Boundary
Urban Area BoundaryTo Be Removed
Proposed Urban Area Boundary
McIVOR AVE.
124 AVE.202A ST.202 ST.125 AVE
.
201 S
T.ALLISON ST.125 AVE
DAVE
N
P
O
R
T
D
R.
POWELL AVE.
202
8
51246712426
12
4
5
5
12409
12411
12407
12410
2028812402
12439 124691241612487 2027512
4
7
8
12404
20298202632027712481124932024712457
2018512425
12441
124
5
2
12440
12
4
4
8
12
4
7
5
12450
12396
12400
12429
12
4
5
6
12419
2027812455201392028312416 202022019212445
2032112408
1244
9
12
4
8
6
12382
12463
12
4
9
8
12383
12
4
6
1
12402
2014512
4
6
2
124
6
2 202202020212406
2023
5
203112026912402
12428
12461
12437
12495
12399
12491
12
4
9
7
12
4
7
9
12389
12451
12422 2027412420
12405
12401
20225
1246612425
12406
2032412421
12426/28
12421
1244
2 202431246
9
1248
5
12415
12448
12397
1248120111
12403 202131247412
4
9
6
12451
12392
12431
12400
12411
2
0
2
4
0
12476
12434
12486
12442
2
0
2
6
0
12
4
6
7
2019912398
12391
12
4
7
3
20205 2025112
4
7
0
38
17
43
6
15
33
103
44
48
B
25
32
5
2
46
39
84
40
9
33
Rem 1
1
50
28
11
66
11
2
35
5
28
12
1
12
6
47
4
24
9
36
35
5
34
7
A
23
29
65
17
14
27
11
16
187
88
13
104
30
34
15
19
26
2
1
22
4
12
51
18
87
14
37
PARK
6
9
3
67
44
26
2
102
31
1
7
21
8627
8
4140
83
31
1
39
3
49
6
Pcl. 1
43
20
89
13
37
3
4
32
PARK
7 10
10
2
25
6
8
45
45
5
36
16
42
8
10
13
85
5
29
3
42
38
Pcl. A
30
EPP 55981
P 20395EPP 55982 P 73431P 21555P 55583EP 17262
P 20395LMP 41518
P 42230P 21483P 73431
EPP 55982BCP 46775P 21483LMP 41518EPP 55982
P 73431
BCP 30587
EPP 62340P 21555LMP 41518BCP 30587
BCP 24827
EPP 55982P 20395LMP 42683
P 20395EPP 58146P 38722
LMP 41518P 42230
P 38722
BCP 30587
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
Agricultural
Urban Residential
7333-2017945
Urban Area Boundary
Urban Area Boundary
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7308-2017
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7308-2017."
2.Those parcel (s) or tract (s) of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 102 District Lot 263 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 50054
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1701 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban
(Medium Density) Residential).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 14th day of February, 2017.
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX D
EPP 66754EPP 58037BCP 30586EP 55731
LMP 41519 LMP 39380BCP
3
0
5
8
6
RW 50055 RW 62664BCP 30586LMP 41519BCP 30586BCP 30586 LMP 39379EPP 57021RW 62664EP 42229
BCP 30586
BCP 30586RW 62664
McIVOR AVE.
124 AVE.202A ST.202 ST.125
AVE
.
201 S
T.ALLISON ST.125 AVE
DAVE
N
P
O
R
T
D
R.
POWELL AVE.
202
8
51246712426
12
4
5
5
12409
12411
12407
12410
2028812402
12439 124691241612487 2027512
4
7
8
12404
20298202632027712481124932024712457
2018512425
12441
124
5
2
12440
12
4
4
8
12
4
7
5
12450
12396
12400
12429
12
4
5
6
12419
2027812455201392028312416 202022019212445
2032112408
1244
9
12
4
8
6
12382
12463
12
4
9
8
12383
12
4
6
1
12402
2014512
4
6
2
124
6
2 202202020212406
2023
5
203112026912402
12428
12461
12437
12495
12399
12491
12
4
9
7
12
4
7
9
12389
12451
12422 2027412420
12405
12401
20225
1246612425
12406
2032412421
12426/28
12421
1244
2 202431246
9
1248
5
12415
12448
12397
1248120111
12403 202131247412
4
9
6
12451
12392
12431
12400
12411
2
0
2
4
0
12476
12434
12486
12442
2
0
2
6
0
12
4
6
7
2019912398
12391
12
4
7
3
20205 2025112
4
7
0
EPP 66754EPP 58037BCP 30586EP 55731
LMP 41519 LMP 39380BCP
3
0
5
8
6
RW 50055 RW 62664BCP 30586LMP 41519BCP 30586BCP 30586 LMP 39379EPP 57021RW 62664EP 42229
BCP 30586
BCP 30586RW 62664
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential
7308-20171701
Urban Area Boundary
Urban Area Boundary
APPENDIX E
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No.7327-2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The purpose of this report is to present the Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending
Bylaw No.7327-2017 (Appendix I) to amend the fine amount for one section of the Maple Ridge Tree
Protection and Management Bylaw.
The Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No.7327-2017 has been prepared to
increase the fine for damaging a City owned boulevard tree from $500 to $1000. The purpose of
establishing a fine is to act as a deterrent to City boulevard trees being damaged. However, the fine
amount does not appear to be acting as a deterrent.
The current fine amount is less than the cost to replace one of these trees. By increasing the fine to
an amount significantly above replacement cost, offenders will likely choose the replacement option
thereby ensuring that the cost for replacing the tree is borne by the offender.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No.7327-2017 be given first,
second and third readings.
DISCUSSION:
Background Context:
City environmental technicians have been receiving numerous calls regarding damage to boulevard
trees. When dealing with the offender, the technician first offers the option for tree replacement cost.
They are then told if they fail to avail themselves of this option they will be issued a ticket. Because
the ticket amount ($500) is less than the tree replacement ($600) some people choose the ticket.
This does not achieve the desired result which is to replace the damaged tree at no cost to the City.
By increasing the fine to an amount significantly above replacement cost, offenders will likely choose
the replacement option thereby ensuring that the cost for replacing the tree is borne by the offender.
1105
CONCLUSIONS:
Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No.7327-2017 ensures that the penalty
for damaging City property is a prohibitive measure.
“Original signed by R. MacNair”
_________________________________________
Prepared by: R. MacNair
Manager, Bylaw & Licensing Services
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
General Manager: Public Works and Development Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
Appendix I – Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No. 7327 - 2017
APPENDIX I
City of Maple Ridge
Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No.7327-2017
A bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012
WHEREAS the Council of The City of Maple Ridge deems it expedient to amend the Maple Ridge Ticket
Information Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1. This bylaw may be cited as Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No.
7327-2017
2. Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No. 6929-2012 is amended by changing the
fine amount in Schedule 25 Section 4.5 to $1000.00
READ A FIRST TIME this ____ day of ______________, 2017.
READ A SECOND TIME this ____ day of ______________, 2017.
READ A THIRD TIME this ____ day of ______________, 2017.
ADOPTED this ____ day of ______________, 2017.
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council
FROM: Community Heritage Commission MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Community Heritage Commission Recommendation regarding Federal Bill C-323
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Under the Terms of Reference in the Bylaw that establishes the Community Heritage Commission
(Bylaw No. 5908-2000) the mandate is:
…for the purpose of advising the Council on heritage conservation matters and undertaking
and providing support for such activities as benefit and provide for the advancement of
heritage conservation in the District.
Under that mandate, the Community Heritage Commission has recently become aware of a proposed
federal tax incentive for owners of heritage properties to rehabilitate and maintain the heritage value
of the buildings on their site. Late last year, Bill C-323 was brought forward for debate in Parliament,
which proposes to amend the Federal Income Tax Act for the rehabilitation of historic property. If
passed, Bill C-323 will enable private owners of heritage property across the country (including many
in Maple Ridge) to apply for a tax credit when undertaking restoration or maintenance work on the
heritage building. On March 23, 2017, Bill C-323 received Second Reading and it has been
forwarded to a Standing Committee for review.
On February 7, 2017, the Community Heritage Commission passed the following resolution:
That the CHC recommend that Council consider supporting Bill C-323: An Act to Amend the
Income Tax Act (Rehabilitation of Historic Property) which was tabled in parliament in
December 2016.
Subsequently, the Heritage Commission prepared a report to Council outlining the details and
potential benefits of Bill C-323 on heritage conservation in Maple Ridge and this report is attached
as Appendix A for Council’s information and consideration. The Heritage Commission is seeking
Council’s consideration of providing support for Bill C-323 in writing to the appropriate Federal MPs
and Provincial MLAs, which are listed in the attached report, Appendix A.
RECOMMENDATION:
That a letter indicating Council support of Federal Bill C-323 be prepared for the Mayor’s
signature and that the letter be forwarded to the Federal Members of Parliament, with copies to
others as identified in Appendix A, dated May 23, 2017.
DISCUSSION:
The Community Heritage Commission has prepared a report to Council, attached as Appendix A,
which provides an outline of the details and benefits of the proposed amendment to the Federal
1106
Income Tax Act (Bill C-323) enabling tax credits intended to promote the rehabilitation of historic
property. Several Maple Ridge heritage sites would be eligible for this tax credit under the proposed
tax credit eligibility criteria, which are discussed in the Heritage Commission’s report.
Bill C-323 received Second Reading on March 23, 2017 and has been referred to the Standing
Committee on Environment and Sustainability. The National Trust for Canada has outlined the
process for Bill C-323 as follows:
Second Reading Vote to Send to Committee
Passed, Thursday, March 23
Committee Stage - Bill C-323 is presently at this stage
The Committee has up to 60 sitting days to consider it, make any amendments, and bring it
back to Parliament.
Report Stage Reading (Back to House of Commons)
There will be debate (two one-hour sessions) and voting on proposed amendments the
following week. The process could take up to 30 days.
Third Reading
More debate (two one-hour sessions) and a vote – if passed, the Bill goes to Senate for
debate and passing, Royal Assent, and becomes law.
The Community Heritage Commission has provided a template letter for Council’s consideration,
which has been prepared by Provincial and Federal non-profit heritage organizations.
CONCLUSION:
The Community Heritage Commission’s work involves creating awareness and education around the
benefits of heritage conservation within the Maple Ridge community. While these are important
tools in heritage resource management, financial incentives are equally, if not more important in
many cases. The Heritage Commission believes that adding this additional tool to the mix will
provide a significant boost to the effectiveness of their work.
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Lisa Zosiak, M.R.M., MCIP, RPP
Planner
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter M.PL., MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA. P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A: Council Report Prepared by the Community Heritage Commission
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council
FROM: Community Heritage Commission MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Community Heritage Commission Recommendation regarding Federal Bill C-323
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Bill C-323: An Act to Amend the Federal Income Tax Act (Rehabilitation of Historic Property) received
second reading in the Parliament of Canada on March 9, 2017 (Appendix 1 and Link #1). If
approved, the Act would enable property owners of sites listed on the Canadian Register of Historic
Places to obtain a tax credit on eligible costs for rehabilitation work. The Canadian Register of
Historic Places (www.historicplaces.ca and Link #2) is maintained by Parks Canada and provides a
listing of local heritage sites across the country. Maple Ridge has a total of 28 heritage properties
listed on the Canadian Register of Historic Places. The Community Heritage Commission sees
several benefits to the proposed Federal Income Tax Act amendment, including:
Creating an incentive for heritage property owners to add property to the Heritage Register;
Eligibility for both residential and commercial properties;
Retaining the economic and heritage value of local heritage sites;
Contributing to community identity and sense of place;
Stimulating growth in locally based high skilled jobs;
Encouraging local sourcing of building materials;
Supporting both the Maple Ridge Cultural and Tourism Strategies currently underway.
With the above benefits in mind, the following resolution was passed at the February 7, 2017
Community Heritage Commission meeting:
R17-008
It was moved and seconded:
That the CHC recommend that Council consider supporting Bill C-323: An Act to Amend the
Income Tax Act (Rehabilitation of Historic Property) which was tabled in Parliament in
December 2016.
CARRIED
The Maple Ridge Community Heritage Commission would like to request Council’s support for the Bill
as it will create a monetary incentive for private owners of historic buildings to conserve and restore
the heritage value of their property. A sample letter of support from Heritage BC is attached for
APPENDIX A
Council’s information and reference (Appendix 2). Heritage BC is a not-for-profit organization
supporting heritage conservation throughout the Province (www.heritagebc.ca).
DISCUSSION:
a) Background Context:
This issue was brought to the attention of the Community Heritage Commission by member at large
Russell Irvine at the February 7, 2017 regular meeting.
Purpose of Bill C-323
Bill C–323 (Appendix 1 and Web-Link #1) is proposed to amend the Income Tax Act (Rehabilitation
of Historic Property), which was introduced and read the first time in Parliament on December 1,
2016. The Bill received Second Reading on March 23, 2017 and has been referred to the Standing
Committee on Environment and Sustainability. If approved, the Income Tax Act will enable
residential or commercial properties listed on the Canadian Register of Historic Places
(www.historicplaces.ca) to be eligible for a tax credit on rehabilitation work undertaken. In order to
apply for the tax credit, the work must be done in accordance with the Standards and Guidelines for
Historic Places in Canada1 and certified by a professional architect registered in Canada. Tax credits
may be received on costs associated with:
Construction;
Professional fees;
Insurance;
Development; and
Site improvement.
The tax credit does not include acquisition, cosmetic, or furnishing costs.
The Community Heritage Commission would like Maple Ridge Council to show support for Bill C-323,
in an effort to encourage a favourable vote on the proposed amendment to the Federal Tax Act.
Maple Ridge Heritage Sites and Canadian Register of Historic Places
In 2001, the Federal government formed a partnership with the provinces, territories, and
communities to establish a consistent approach to heritage conservation in Canada. The outcome of
this partnership was the creation of the Canadian Register of Historic Places, which is a user-friendly
database that includes descriptive heritage site listings from local, provincial, territorial, and federal
government heritage registers. The Canadian Register of Historic Places, managed by Parks
Canada, is an internet-based single source of information for all of Canada’s valued heritag e sites,
which serves as a heritage tool for planners, policymakers, developers, property owners, industry,
community organizations, teachers, and students across the country.
______________________________________
1 Standards & Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada: A heritage conservation tool that sets
a pan-Canadian benchmark for heritage conservation practice in Canada. This tool offers results-oriented
guidance for sound decision-making using a set of conservation principles and guidelines to help users
understand, plan, and intervene (through preservation, rehabilitation, and/or restoration) on a historic place.
http://www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx
For a heritage property to be eligible for inclusion on the Canadian Register of Historic Places, it
must first be listed on a community heritage register. Once a municipal Council approves a listing on
their local register, that listing is then eligible for inclusion on the provincial or territorial register. In
this province, there is the British Columbia Register of Historic Places (see Link #3), which contains
both provincially and locally recognized historic places throughout the province (see diagram below).
Section 598 of the British Columbia Local Government Act provides the authority for local
governments to establish community heritage registers. The Maple Ridge Community Heritage
Register was established in 1999 by Council resolution and the most recent update was in 2008. All
of the 28 listings on the Maple Ridge Community Heritage Register are also on the provincial and
national heritage registers. The Community Heritage Commission is planning to commence another
Heritage Register update in late 2017, after the Heritage Inventory update is complete.
Benefits of Bill C-323 if Approved
Because eligibility for a tax credit will include the requirement that the property is listed on the
Canadian Register of Historic Places, the CHC believes that the tax incentive would encourage more
heritage property owners to agree to a listing on the Maple Ridge Community Heritage Register (and
subsequently the provincial and federal heritage registers). It is important to note that a listing on
the Canadian Register of Historic Places does not equate to full legal protection. Full legal protection
occurs only through bylaw approval and the Community Heritage Register is not a bylaw. However,
Sections 604 and 605 of the Local Government Act provide municipalities with the authority to
temporarily withhold approvals for building or demolition permits for properties on a Community
Heritage Register if it is deemed that the intended work will negatively impact the site’s heritage
value. This restriction is outlined in Sections 19 and 20 of the Maple Ridge Heritage Procedures
Bylaw No. 6951-2012 (see Web-Link #4). Additionally, a property listed on a Heritage Register is
eligible for special provisions within the BC Building Code Heritage Building Supplement in an effort
to ensure that a site’s heritage character is preserved and these often result in some cost-savings to
the property owner.
An information booklet on Bill C-323 was prepared by National Trust Canada (see Link #5) and is
attached as Appendix 3. The booklet provides a summary of the Bill’s benefits, how it is intended to
be implemented, and contact information.
Some of the benefits of Bill C-323 identified in the booklet, include:
Retention of cultural heritage
Creation of cultural value
Enhancement of community pride
Creation of professional and trades jobs
Promotion of local tourism
Contribution to local economy
Conservation of existing embodied energy2 of buildings
Reduction of waste materials in landfills
The National Trust Canada and the Royal Architectural Institute have come out in support of Bill C-
323 along with several Members of Parliament from all three of the large Federal political parties
(Web-Links #5 and #6). Additionally, several British Columbia municipalities have also shown
support for this Bill such as New Westminster, Victoria, Terrace, Nanaimo, Ladysmith, Oliver and
Chetwynd.
Unfortunately Bill C-323 does not include any financial support for publicly owned heritage sites for
local governments. The Heritage Commission sees this as a missed opportunity to help
municipalities in their efforts to demonstrate leadership in local heritage conservation practices and
promotion of a community’s historical resources.
Alignment with CHC Heritage Plan and 2018 Business Plan:
A priority for the Commission in 2018 is to research current best practices and potential regulatory
tools that provide financial incentives for retaining significant historic buildings within a community.
Undertaking a “Heritage Incentives Review” is identified in the CHC’s Heritage Plan (Web-Link #7),
which was endorsed by Council in December 2013. More recently, a heritage incentives research
project was itemized in the Commission’s 2017 Business Plan, as a 2018 future project with a cost
allocation requirement of approximately $35,000 (Appendix 4). Knowing that new Federal
legislation is available would obviously be a key building block in the provision of financial assistance
to restore private historic buildings.
______________________________________
2 Embodied Energy: The total expenditure of energy involved in the creation of both the building and its constituent
materials. Note: the energy expended to build the structure is 15 to 40 times its annual energy use. Current rating
systems, in measuring annual energy/operating costs, do not account for this embodied energy. (2016) Building
Resilience: Practical Guidelines for the Sustainable Rehabilitation of Buildings in Canada
http://www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/resources-ressources.aspx
Request for Letter of Support
The Maple Ridge Community Heritage Commission sees Bill C-323 as a significant benefit to heritage
conservation as well as to the sustainability and resiliency of the community. A letter in support of
Bill C-323 would demonstrate that Maple Ridge values our rich history and is committed to
encouraging the reduction of energy consumption and waste. The attached template letter
(Appendix 4) has been provided by Heritage BC (www.heritagebc.ca). If Council agrees that the
community’s heritage resources would benefit from Bill C-323, the Heritage Commission requests
that a letter of support be addressed to:
Dan Ruimy, Pitt Meadows-Maple Ridge Member of Parliament
Melanie Joly, Minister of Canadian Heritage
Catherine McKenna, Minister of Environment and Climate Change (Parks Canada)
With copies to:
Steve Thomson, BC Minister of Lands, Forest and Natural Resource Operations (Heritage
Branch)
John Aldag, BC Member of Parliament on the Standing Committee for Environment &
Sustainability
Lisa Marie Beare, MLA, Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows
Bob D’Eith, MLA, Maple Ridge-Mission
Gord Macdonald, Chair – Heritage BC
National Trust for Canada, Ottawa
Conclusion:
It is the belief of the Community Heritage Commission that Bill C-323 would encourage an increase
in the restoration and ongoing maintenance of privately owned heritage properties. Private property
owners who see a benefit in preserving heritage will contribute significantly to telling the
community’s story, along with strengthening local identity and fostering a sense of place.
Additionally, maintaining and retaining buildings over the long term means that less energy is
consumed through new construction and less waste is added to the landfill.
The Heritage Commission strongly supports Bill C-323 and we believe that Council’s support will
demonstrate a commitment to a vibrant, resilient, and sustainable community for current and future
generations.
_______________________________________________
Brenda Smith, Chair
Community Heritage Commission
Appendices:
Appendix 1: Bill C-323: An Act to Amend the Income Tax Act (Rehabilitation of Historic Property)
Appendix 2: Template Letter, provided by Heritage BC
Appendix 3: Heritage Bill Information Package, Peter Van Loan, MP
Appendix 4: Excerpt from CHC 2017 Business Plan showing future Tax Incentives Research Project
Web-Links:
1. Bill C-323: An Act to Amend the Income Tax Act (Rehabilitation of Historic Property):
http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&DocId=8657960&Col=1
2. Canadian Register of Historic Places: www.historicplaces.ca
3. Maple Ridge Community Heritage Register: https://www.mapleridge.ca/817/Heritage-Register
4. Maple Ridge Heritage Procedures Bylaw: https://www.mapleridge.ca/DocumentCenter/View/539
5. The National Trust for Canada: http://www.nationaltrustcanada.ca/
6. The Royal Architectural Institute of Canada: https://www.raic.org/news/raic-supports-bill-c-323
7. Community Heritage Commission Heritage Plan: https://www.mapleridge.ca/239/Heritage-Plan
First Session, Forty-second Parliament,
64-65 Elizabeth II, 2015-2016
HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA
BILL C-323
An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property)
FIRST READING, DECEMBER 1, 2016
MR. VAN LOAN
421247
SUMMARY
This enactment amends the Income Tax Act to establish a tax credit for expenses related to the
rehabilitation of a historic property. It also establishes a tax deduction for the capital cost of
property used in the course of such a rehabilitation.
Available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address:
http://www.parl.gc.ca
1st Session, 42nd Parliament,
64-65 Elizabeth II, 2015-2016
HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA
BILL C-323
An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property)
R.S., c. 1 (5th Supp.)
Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of
Canada, enacts as follows:
1 The Income Tax Act is amended by adding the following after section 127:
Definitions
127.01 (1) The following definitions apply in this section and in section 127.02.
conservation standards means the standards and guidelines for the conservation of historic
places in Canada adopted and applied by the Parks Canada Agency. (normes de conservation)
historic property means a building or other place that is
(a) commemorated or marked as a historic place under section 3 of the Historic Sites and
Monuments Act;
(b) designated as a heritage or historic site or property under the laws of a province that the
Minister, in consultation with the Minister responsible for the Parks Canada Agency, designates
as having a purpose similar to that of the Historic Sites and Monuments Act; or
(c) listed on the Canadian Register of Historic Places, as administered by the Parks Canada
Agency. (propriété historique)
rehabilitation expenses means the costs incurred by a taxpayer in a particular taxation year
in the course of rehabilitating a historic property that are
(a) construction costs,
(b) professional fees,
(c) insurance costs,
(d) development fees,
(e) administrative costs,
(f) site improvement costs related to the character-defining elements of the property, or
(g) prescribed costs,
APPENDIX 1
but does not include costs for the acquisition of the historic property, costs to furnish it or costs
incurred solely for aesthetic or cosmetic purposes. (frais de réhabilitation)
rehabilitation tax credit, in respect of a historic property for a taxation year, means the
amount not exceeding 20% of the amount, if any, by which
(a) a taxpayer’s rehabilitation expenses for the year
exceeds
(b) any amount of government assistance, as defined in subsection 127(9), that, at the time of
the filing of the taxpayer’s return of income for the taxation year, the taxpayer has received, is
entitled to receive or can reasonably be expected to receive, in respect of the rehabilitation
expenses for the historic property, in the taxation year. (crédit d’impôt pour la réhabilitation)
unused portion, in respect of a historic property for a taxation year, is the amount determined
by the formula
A - B
where
A
is the amount of the rehabilitation tax credit that the taxpayer was entitled to deduct for
the previous taxation year; and
B
is the amount of the rehabilitation tax credit that the taxpayer deducted in that taxation
year (fraction inutilisée)
Deduction
(2) A taxpayer may, in respect of a historic property that they own, deduct from the tax for the
year otherwise payable under this Part an amount not exceeding the total of the rehabilitation
tax credit for the taxation year and any unused portion if an architect authorized to practise the
profession of architect in Canada certifies that the rehabilitation of the historic property was
carried out in accordance with conservation standards.
Limitation
(3) No amount may be deducted under subsection (2) for a taxation year that begins more than
10 years after the first taxation year for which the taxpayer deducted an amount for the
rehabilitation tax credit in respect of the historic property.
Capital cost — rehabilitation of historic property
127.02 (1) In computing a taxpayer’s income for a taxation year, there may be deducted a
portion of the capital cost to the taxpayer of property used in the course of rehabilitating a
historic property for which the taxpayer may deduct an amount for the rehabilitation tax credit
under section 127.01 if
(a) no amount is deducted by the taxpayer in relation to the property under paragraph
20(1)(a); and
(b) the taxpayer did not receive assistance, whether as a grant, subsidy, forgivable loan,
deduction from tax, investment allowance or as any other form of assistance, from a
government, municipality or other public authority in respect of, or for the acquisition of, the
property.
Amount
(2) The amount that may be deducted under subsection (1) must not exceed the following
percentage of the capital cost of the property for the taxation year in which the property was
used by the taxpayer for the rehabilitation:
(a) 25% for the first taxation year;
(b) 50% for the second taxation year; and
(c) 25% for the third taxation year.
Application
2 (1) Sections 127.01 and 127.02 of the Income Tax Act, as enacted by section 1 of
this Act, apply to taxation years that begin on or after January 1 of the year following
the year in which this Act receives royal assent.
(2) For the first taxation year to which subsection 127.01(1) of the Income Tax Act,
as enacted by section 1 of this Act, applies, the reference to “in a particular taxation
year”, in the definition rehabilitation expenses in that subsection, is to be read as “in a
particular taxation year and in the previous taxation year”.
Published under authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons
DATE
Dear YOUR MP,
We are writing to express our support for Bill C-323: An Act to Amend the Income Tax Act (Rehabilitation of
Historic Property).
This private members Bill, tabled on December 1, 2016, is inspired by the successful US Federal Historic Tax Credit
Program, the outcome of which resulted in hundreds of thousands of housing units, many for low/moderate income
families.
In Canada, Bill C-323 has the potential of achieving the same success, widely affecting property owners and
developers, the construction industry, and positively impacting the economy, job creation and environmental issues.
Bill C-323 includes the creation of:
- A 20% tax credit on eligible costs for rehabilitation work done to designated historic places (commercial &
owner-occupied residential);
- An accelerated Capital Cost Allowance (25%/50%/25%) for eligible capitalized costs incurred under the same
conditions of the tax credit (commercial only).
These two tax measures would transform the economic fundamentals for renewing historic places, and will
encourage building conservation of every size and type, from landmark commercial buildings to modest homes.
Examples in your constituency include:
1. (INSERT NAMES AND LOCATIONS OF BUILDINGS IN YOUR CONSTITUENCY THAT COULD
BENEFIT FROM THE NEW TAX CREDIT.)
2.
3.
There are many examples of the significant financial impact of heritage conservation:
- Studies show building rehabilitation generates upwards of 21% more jobs, including skilled jobs, then the same
investment in new construction.
- Building renewal and re-use capitalizes on materials and energy already invested, reduces construction and
demolition waste, and avoids environmental impact associated with new development. A recent study shows
that it takes from 10 to 80 years for a new “green” building to make up for the negative climate change impacts
of its construction.
- The Commercial Heritage Properties Incentive Fund (CHPIF), a Canada -wide pilot program (2003 - 2008), was
designed to test the benefit of a heritage tax credit. The results were impressive: federal contributions of $21.5
million supporting 49 projects leveraged over 8 times more in private sector investment ($177.2 million).
- The new tax credit program will be supported with tools already in place, such as the Canadian Register of
Historic Places, which continues to be populated with designated heritage properties, and nationally-adopted
heritage conservation standards.
As the significant impact of this Bill will be felt in our own community, as well as nationally, we urge you to
support Bill C-323: An Act to Amend the Income Tax Act (Rehabilitation of Historic Property).
Thank you for your consideration of this important issue.
Sincerely,
YOUR NAME
cc National Trust of Canada, Ottawa
Heritage BC, Vancouver
APPENDIX 2
ASK YOUR MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT
TO SUPPORT BILL C-323
THE RESTORATION OF HERITAGE
PROPERTIES
A TAX CREDIT FOR
An Act to Amend the Income Tax Act
(Rehabilitation of Historic Property)
Peter Van Loan, MP
APPENDIX 3
The Fairmont Empress Hotel—Victoria, BC
What People Saying about Bill C-323:
"This is an idea that has had widespread support from heritage
advocates, federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments, and
the Federation of Canadian Municipalities over the years. It’s exciting to
see it tabled in the House and given first reading. We know that the tax
system can be a powerful tool to stimulate private investment in heritage
buildings. In the United States, the introduction of a 20 percent federal tax
credit for rehabilitation of heritage buildings 40 years ago revolutionized
the way developers think about old buildings and launched a
booming and competitive preservation industry."
– National Trust for Canada
Contact Your MP, and Tell Them to Support Bill C-323
Write them at: House of Commons, Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
Or, phone or email them.
Bill C-323
What is Bill C-323?
A tax credit that will seek to limit the destruction of Canada’s heritage buildings,
and instead encourage the rehabilitation of these culturally significant buildings
The Bill would also allow owners to write-off spending on heritage restoration at a
faster rate than is currently the case
Why introduce Bill C-323?
There is a tremendous public
interest in the preservation and
restoration of heritage
properties. But the cost burden
of doing so is usually more
expensive to owners than other
alternatives—like demolition
and new construction
This Bill helps owners who are
preserving heritage buildings
with the cost of delivering this
public benefit
The pilot program for this policy
was very successful in
encouraging investment from
private individuals and
businesses. The pilot program
for this Bill saw tremendous
growth in property values,
occupancy rates, and profits for
businesses in rehabilitated
buildings
Bill C-323
Henry House—Halifax, NS
Why preserve heritage infrastructure?
This Bill will help reconnect Canadians to their cultural heritage
Investments in our built heritage create cultural value. A similar policy in the United
States is described as “the most effective Federal program to promote community
revitalization”
Large rehabilitation projects often create lots of good paying jobs
How does it work?
The tax credit would be available to properties that appear on the National Register
of Historic Places
An architect must certify that the eligible building has undergone rehabilitation in
accordance with the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic
Places in Canada for the project to be eligible for the credit and the accelerated
write-off
Bill C-323
Sir John A MacDonald’s Summer Home at Les Rochers—Rivière-du-Loup, QC
What are people saying about it?
Bill C-323
Capitole de Québec—Québec, QC
“Peter’s progressive bill
represents a true partnership
role for government in
protecting Canada’s
Heritage.” – Michael
McClelland, ERA Architects
This bill will encourage “historic
building owners to rehabilitate
rather than demolish”. This “is key
for truly sustainable communities; in
terms of both the embodied energy in
an existing building, and for such
places enhancing our shared social
identity, community pride and
civitas.” – Eric Pattinson, Pattinson
Architecture
Bill C-323 is “a win-win: for
heritage; and for the local economy
where historic preservation creates
jobs for professionals and within
the trades” – James Reid, Principal
Architect, taigh Architecture, Inc.
Gooderham and Worts—Toronto, ON
Frequently Asked Questions
What does Bill C-323 do?
Bill C-323 creates a 20% tax credit on eligible costs for rehabilitation work done to a
building that is designated as a historic place. The bill also creates an Accelerated
Capital Cost Allowance for eligible capitalized costs incurred under the same
conditions as the tax credit.
What is the purpose of Bill C-323?
The Bill aims to preserve our cultural heritage, and build a foundation upon which the
policy may be expanded. Preserving our communal heritage benefits all Canadians,
and with Canada 150 fast approaching, it is appropriate to introduce this policy now.
What is a “historic place”?
A historic place is defined as a property on the Register of Historic Places, a list of
designated properties that have significant historic value to Canada. The enabling
legislation for the Register can be found in s. 3 of the Historic Sites and Monuments
Act. Bill C-323 includes a provision for the Minister to extend the definition of “historic
place” to other buildings and definitions of historic places (e.g. provincial registers of
historic places).
What is an “eligible cost”?
Eligible costs under the provisions of the bill are defined as costs that are
construction, professional, insurance, development, site improvement, or otherwise
prescribed costs. This explicitly excludes acquisition, cosmetic and furnishing costs.
What is defined as “rehabilitation work”?
Rehabilitation work is defined as work that is done in accordance with the Standards
and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, and must be
certified by a registered professional architect licensed to practice in Canada.
Over what period of time may the tax credit be claimed?
Each certified project has 10 years over which it may have a tax credit claimed, or
unused portion thereof carried forward.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an Accelerated Capital Cost Allowance?
An Accelerated Capital Cost Allowance is a tax mechanism that permits the deduction
of taxable capital expenditures in a regularized fashion. For the purposes of this bill,
this means that costs which are capitalized in nature, are eligible for a 3 year, 25%,
50%, 25% per year deduction, so that after 3 years, the entire value of the capital
expenditure has been written-off.
Can a capitalized cost be claimed under both the tax credit and the accelerated
Capital Cost Allowance regimes?
Yes, however, the taxable base will be reduced by the amount of the other policy, e.g.
if the capitalized costs are claimed under the tax credit, only the remaining 80% of the
capitalized costs will be eligible under the accelerated Capital Cost Allowance.
Has this policy been tested for viability in Canada?
In the early 2000’s, the government implemented a pilot program. The program,
whose end goal was to be converted into a tax credit such as the one this bill creates,
on average doubled the market property values of historic properties, business
revenue, and occupancy rates of the historic properties. These activities incentivized
by the Fund generated significant GST and corporate tax revenues. The policy is
considered viable in Canada.
Has this policy been tested in other countries?
Many countries have heritage grants, programs, etc. The most similar policy to the
one this bill advances is the tax credit program in the United States, which provides a
20% tax credit on costs related to the rehabilitation of designated historic buildings,
and a 10% credit on non-designated building built before 1936. The program,
implemented in 1976, is recognized as having been hugely successful, with over
41,000 projects certified. Furthermore, the program was found to have a net-positive
impact on the treasury of +$5.0 billion over the present life of the program (1976-
2015).
Bill C-323
How Can We Make Bill C-323 Law?
To make Bill C-323 law , and to protect our built heritage, MPs have to vote for the
Bill. The best way to get your MP to vote for the Bill is to contact them, and encourage
them to vote in favour of Bill C-323.
You can:
1. Send them a letter at House of Commons, Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
2. Phone them, or
3. Email them.
Each and every contact is one more step toward making Bill C-323 law, and one
more step toward preserving our cultural built heritage.
If you don’t know who your MP is, just search “Who is my MP?” in Google, or visit
“http://tinyurl.com/hjw6bpv”. This website, from the Parliament of Canada, lets you
search for who your MP is by postal code.
Imperial Theatre—Saint John, NB
Excerpt from: Community Heritage Commission Business Plan 2017-2021
Activities/Purpose: HERITAGE INCENTIVES REVIEW
The Heritage Incentives Review was mandated in the Heritage Plan to be conducted in 2016. Delays
in funding the Heritage Inventory Update Project have resulted in replacement of the review with
more attention to Education Initiatives. The review can be appropriately scheduled following the
updates of the Heritage Inventory and Heritage Register. Note: this work is not proposed to
commence until 2018 and no funds are requested for this project at this time.
Maple Ridge Heritage Plan page 35:
Heritage Incentives Review
The CHC should assist in a full review of the City’s heritage incentives program. The intent is to
develop an enhanced heritage incentives program that would better serve the needs of heritage
property owners, by considering the following initiatives:
Review heritage conservation tools enabled under provincial legislation.
Consider a broader use of tax incentives, financial and developmental incentives and
other methods to ensure financial viability of conservation efforts.
Review the possibility of a municipal grants program for private building owners, to
provide incentives for restoration as well as maintenance. Determine scope and
magnitude of an ongoing grants program that would assist both restoration and
maintenance. Assess delivery methods for grants (through CHC, a separate foundation or
a fee-for service contract).
Functions Performed/Degree of Service:
Heritage Incentives Review is a complex process requiring the services of a consultant.
ACTIVITY 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
$ Vol
Hrs $ Vol
Hrs $ Vol
Hrs $ Vol
Hrs $ Vol
Hrs
Heritage
Incentives
Review
35,000 50
Performance Measure:
The Heritage Incentives Review will provide improved and updated information for planning and
development decision making in Maple Ridge. A program of improved incentives will encourage
residents to engage more fully in heritage conservation.
APPENDIX 4
1 of 1
CityCityCityCity of Maple Ridgeof Maple Ridgeof Maple Ridgeof Maple Ridge
TO:TO:TO:TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETINGMEETINGMEETINGMEETING DATE:DATE:DATE:DATE: 23-May-2017
and Members of Council FILE NO:FILE NO:FILE NO:FILE NO:
FROM:FROM:FROM:FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING:MEETING:MEETING:MEETING: Council
SUBJECTSUBJECTSUBJECTSUBJECT: Council Remuneration
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Council remuneration was last adjusted in 2011. The Audit & Finance Committee discussed this issue
at meetings on March 20, April 24, and May 8, 2017. The Committee recommended that a Vancouver
Consumer Price Index adjustment be provided now, and annually thereafter. This recommendation is
incorporated into the bylaw that is attached.
RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION::::
That Bylaw 7330That Bylaw 7330That Bylaw 7330That Bylaw 7330----2017 2017 2017 2017 bebebebe given first, second and third reading.given first, second and third reading.given first, second and third reading.given first, second and third reading.
DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:
The Audit & Finance Committee discussed Council remuneration at meetings on March 20, April 24,
and May 8, 2017. The Committee recommended the following:
•that no detailed remuneration review be done at this time,
•starting on June 1, 2017, annual adjustments will be provided based on the change in
Vancouver CPI for the previous calendar year,
•that the above recommendations be incorporated into a bylaw and brought forward for Council
consideration.
CONCLUSIONS:CONCLUSIONS:CONCLUSIONS:CONCLUSIONS:
The attached bylaw reflects the direction provided to staff from the Audit and Finance Committee
regarding Council remuneration.
“Original signed by Catherine Nolan” “Original signed by Frances King”
_________________________ ______________________________
Prepared by: Catherine Nolan, CPA, CGA Reviewed by: Frances King
Manager of Accounting Director of Human Resources
“Original signed by Paul Gill” “Original signed by Ted Swabey”
______________________________________ ________________________________
Approved by: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA Concurrence: E.C. SwabeyE.C. SwabeyE.C. SwabeyE.C. Swabey
GM, Corporate & Financial Services Chief Administrative OfficerChief Administrative OfficerChief Administrative OfficerChief Administrative Officer
1131
CITYCITYCITYCITY OF MAPLE RIDGEOF MAPLE RIDGEOF MAPLE RIDGEOF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO.BYLAW NO.BYLAW NO.BYLAW NO. 7330733073307330----2222017017017017
A bylaw for establishing Council Remuneration
The Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Maple Ridge Council Remuneration
Bylaw No. 7330-2017”.
2. The Mayor’s annual remuneration is established at a base salary of $92,310 plus a
car allowance of $7,125. The base salary must be adjusted annually thereafter in
accordance with section 5 of this Bylaw.
3. Councillors’ annual remuneration is established at a base salary of $37,285 plus a
car allowance of $2,423. The base salary must be adjusted annually thereafter in
accordance with section 5 of this Bylaw
4. The Acting Mayor’s remuneration is established annually at the Councillor rate plus
20% of the Mayor’s base salary rate and must be adjusted annually in accordance
with section 5 of this Bylaw. Acting Mayor’s remuneration will be available to the
Councillor who is assigned to that role for the duration of the assignment.
5. Commencing June 1, 2017, base salary will be adjusted annually, on June 1st of each
year, by a percentage equivalent to the percentage increase in the Vancouver
Consumer Price Index increase for the previous calendar year. In years where there
is no change, or a decrease, in the Consumer Price Index, base salary will remain the
same as the previous year.
6. Members of Council, and their dependents, will be eligible for medical, dental,
extended health, group life and AD&D benefits with the premiums paid by the City
7. Bylaw No. 6018-2002 is hereby repealed in its entirety
8. If any section, subsection, clause or other part of this Bylaw is for any reason held to
be invalid by the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Bylaw.
READREADREADREAD a first time on the day of , 2017.
READREADREADREAD a second time on the day of , 2017.
READREADREADREAD a third time on the day of , 2017.
ADOPTEDADOPTEDADOPTEDADOPTED on the day of 2017.
_______________________________
PRESIDING MEMBERPRESIDING MEMBERPRESIDING MEMBERPRESIDING MEMBER
_______________________________
CORPORATE OFFICERCORPORATE OFFICERCORPORATE OFFICERCORPORATE OFFICER
1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 01-0530-01
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Train Whistle Cessation
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Train whistles and blasts are an important public safety measure, a warning of an approaching train,
however these can also be troublesome for individuals living within hearing range as the noise is
disruptive, especially at night.
Staff have been working over the past several years to find a resolution to the issue. Transport
Canada issued a set of new regulations recently, and within these regulations there is a formal
process for cities wanting whistles and blasts to cease at public railway crossings.
Staff have recently completed an engineering study that identified improvements at each public rail
crossing to meet the new Transport Canada regulations for grade crossing safety and that would
facilitate whistle cessation. For whistle cessation, the report identified minor improvements that the
City is currently undertaking. The report suggests that the city can apply for whistle cessation upon
completion of the improvements at all public crossing except one, namely the Bell Pole Company
spur on River Road in Albion due to low train crossing volume over the spur.
Prior to staff approaching the railway company to formally pursue a whistle cessation order, staff is
seeking Council’s approval to proceed with a blanket cessation ban for all public crossings in Maple
Ridge, except the lone spur crossing on River Road in Albion that serves Bell Pole.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That staff be directed to undertake the preparatory whistle cessation steps as required by Transport
Canada for the eight (8) public railway crossings located in Maple Ridge except for the crossing at
the Bell Pole Spur on River Road in Albion (Milepost 100.34); and
that staff prepare a resolution for consideration by Council as per the requirement detailed in Step 6
of Transport Canada’s Procedure for Train Whistling at Public Grade Crossings as identified in this
staff report dated May 23, 2017.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The City of Maple Ridge has nine (9) public railway crossings which it could apply for a whistle
cessation application under the new Transport Canada regulations. (See map in Appendix A). It is
recommended that the City not apply for a ban at the Bell Pole Company Spur railway crossing due to
1132
2
the low train traffic volume at the spur and the manual protection protocols that are currently in
place. The remaining eight crossings are where staff typically receive complaints of noise, more
specifically at 287 Street in east Maple Ridge (1 crossing), Port Haney (1 crossing), Albion (2
crossings) and Hammond (4 crossings). It is these eight crossings that staff recommend pursuit of a
whistle cessation order for at this time.
Whistle cessation, if granted for these eight crossings, would apply to both freight trains and
passenger trains (West Coast Express). It is important to note that trains would retain the option of
sounding their whistles at private crossings.
Lastly, even with whistle cessation in place, railway companies may whistle for other reasons such as
when people or animals are observed to be on or near the track as the train approaches. If a railway
company determines that routine trespassing is occurring at a specific location which is not a
crossing, they may instruct crews to whistle each time they approach that location. If there is a
desire to eliminate this type of whistling, the city will need to take steps to eliminate trespassing. This
could be achieved through the installation of fencing or a creation of a new public crossing to
manage the trespass.
Transport Canada regulates railroads and has established a detailed procedure for cities to follow for
consideration of the cessation of train whistles. The procedure is described below and the City’s
status is noted in italics. While the procedure laid out by Transport Canada is straightforward, there
is greater efficiency in City staff receiving direction from Council ahead of Step 2 to in order to
provide greater clarity to the railway company and the relevant associations and organizations as to
the City’s objectives. The Transport Canada process is as follows.
Step 1
Interest for whistling cessation is expressed by a citizen or a community group to stop train whistling
at a specific area (one crossing or multiple crossings) along a railway corridor.
The City has received several requests.
Step 2
Municipality consults with Railway Company to assess the feasibility of the whistling cessation
request.
The City has had discussions with the railways over the past few years and expects to meet to review
the standards that must be met at each of the specific crossings prior to consideration of a
cessation order. The City has also completed an engineering study of all the public rail crossings
within Maple Ridge and has determined what works would be required to bring each railway
crossing up to Transport Canada’s most recently revised standards (lights, bells, control arms, etc.)
for consideration for a whistle cessation request. Note that Maple Ridge’s public railway crossings
currently have the appropriate lights, bells and controls arms in place – these were upgraded to
standard with the introduction of the West Coast Express service a number of years ago.
Step 3
The municipality notifies all relevant associations or organizations and issues a public notice of its
intention to pass a resolution declaring that it agrees that whistles should not be used at a specific
area (crossing or multiple crossings) along a railway corridor.
The City will prepare a letter and public notice once all public railway crossings have been selected
and all works are completed to satisfy Transport Canada regulations.
3
Step 4
Municipality and railway assess the crossing(s) against the prescribed requirements in the Grade
Crossings Regulations and Grade Crossing Standards.
Staff has completed an engineering study that identified the works required at each crossing to
ensure compliance with the new Transport Canada regulations and is in the process of
implementing the final recommendations. These works are expected to be completed in the coming
months and the the City expects to continue to work closely with the railway company as it moves
forward with the process.
Step 5
Municipality and railway agree that the crossing(s) meets the prescribed requirements of the Grade
Crossings Regulations and Standards. If there is no mutual agreement efforts are to be made to
resolve the conflict.
Step 5A
(optional) Municipality and railway request a final decision from Transport Canada if disagreement
between the municipality and the railway persists. Transport Canada’s decision on the issue is final.
The City will work with the railway, and if unsuccessful will engage Transport Canada.
Step 6
Municipality passes a resolution declaring that it agrees that whistles should not be used in that
area, thereby prohibiting train whistling.
Staff will prepare a report and resolution for Council’s approval.
Step 7
Railway company notifies Transport Canada and informs the municipality within 30 days that it has
arranged to have whistling ceased at the crossing(s) and the effective date of whistling. The railway
company notifies the municipality and/or the road authorities in writing of the whistling cessation not
later than 30 days after the day whistling is ceased.
Step 8
Municipality and railway share the responsibility for monitoring and maintaining the conditions that
support the cessation of train whistling at the crossing(s). A Transport Canada Railway Safety
Inspector may order the reinstatement of whistling at the crossing(s) should the responsible
authorities fail to maintain the area in a manner that meets the prescribed requirements of the
Grade Crossings Regulations and section 23.1 of the Railway Safety Act.
b) Desired Outcome(s):
The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an update on the work completed towards train
whistle/blast cessation and to receive direction from Council as to preferred next steps as staff
continue to work towards a solution to achieve the cessation.
4
c) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The City continues to receive citizen complaints about the train whistles and while it continues to
respond accordingly, a concrete plan of action will certainly be viewed as a positive step for those
most directly affected by the whistles.
d) Interdepartmental Implications:
Engineering and Property Management departments are working together on this project.
e) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The cost to complete the upgrades to the eight train crossings is approximately $30,000 and staff
are continuing to move forward with these upgrades, ahead of the whistle cessation application.
f) Policy Implications:
Train whistle cessation will require a future bylaw or Council resolution as noted in Step 6 of
Transport Canada’s process.
CONCLUSIONS:
To achieve train whistle cessation, staff must work through the extensive processes required by
Transport Canada. Currently, the City has completed an engineering study to identify what works
would be required to bring each railway crossing up to Transport Canada’s most recently revised
standards for consideration for a whistle cessation and is working through these recommendations.
Property Management will prepare the notifications to other agencies and for the public when
required and will present to Council the necessary bylaw or resolution once agreement has been met
with the railways and/or Transport Canada.
“Original signed by Laurie Darcus”
Prepared by: Laurie Darcus
Manager of Legislative Services
“Original signed by David Pollock”
In Consultation with: David Pollock
Municipal Engineer
“Original signed by Catherine Nolan” for
Approved by: Paul Gill
General Manager, Corporate and Financial Services
“Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
Attachments: Appendix A: Map of Public Railway Crossings in Maple Ridge
5
Appendix A: Map of Public Railway Crossings in Maple Ridge
1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: May 23, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Strong Kids Task Group
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On September 19, 2016 staff presented the final report for the Maple Ridge Resilience Initiative
(MRRI) which included a recommendation to continue the work of the Strong Kids Team (SKT). At
that meeting, Council passed the following resolution.
That staff be directed to work with the Strong Kids Team to develop a draft Terms of
Reference for Council’s consideration.
Staff have worked with the current Strong Kids Team (SKT) members to develop the attached draft
Terms of Reference (TOR) for Council’s consideration. Staff are recommending that Council consider
SKT continuing as a Task Group of Council to drive the initiatives listed below and support the City in
achieving the vision of the Youth Strategy that was endorsed by Council in 2016. It is proposed that
the term for this Task Group be for three years after which it would be reviewed to determine
whether to conclude the Task Group or continue the work.
Should the Strong Kids Team continue as a Task Group or in another format, additional operating
resources would be needed.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Strong Kids Team be endorsed as a Task Group based on the draft Terms of Reference
attached to the staff report dated May 23, 2017, and that this structure be reviewed after a period
of three years, and;
That the financial plan be amended by $12,000 per year for the three-year term to fund the work of
the Strong Kids Task Group.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The Strong Kids Team (SKT) was formed in June 2015 as one part of a broader initiative under
the umbrella of the Maple Ridge Resilience Initiative (MRRI). The SKT’s purpose was preventative
in nature to ensure that children and youth in our community have the best environment to grow
up and thrive in. This prevention focused task group provided a platform to engage the
community in dialogues and activities to support the resiliency of all children, youth and
emerging adults now and in the future. Since its inception, the SKT, in partnership with the Youth
Wellness Centre Committee and the City’s Youth Services Program, conducted stakeholder
surveys that identified emerging trends and mobilized the community.
1151
2
SKT Accomplishments:
The major accomplishments achieved by SKT in 2015 and 2016 are listed below:
• Completed and analyzed a parent/caregiver survey (297 responses).
• Completed and analyzed a youth survey (566 responses).
• Hosted two community forums that focused on the topics of mental health, alcohol, nicotine
and other drugs and the effects of social media. These topics were the three top priorities
derived from the survey responses. Approximately 400 people attended these sessions in
total.
• Hosted a community wide Fentanyl Awareness Forum attended by approximately 500
people.
SKT Next Steps:
Based on the success of the above approach, the SKT has identified the following action items
as priorities moving forward:
• Completing and analyzing a youth and parent/caregiver survey every three years.
• Continuing to respond to emerging trends through community engagement and dialogue.
• Assisting in the implementation of the Maple Ridge Youth Strategy. The SKT mandate aligns
closely with three of the four focus areas of the Youth Strategy: Community Engagement,
Wellness & Mental Health, and Transitioning to Adulthood.
Current Structure:
Currently School Trustee Susan Carr is the Chair of the SKT, Councillor Kiersten Duncan is the
Co-chair and Sherri Skerratt, School District No. 42 is a member. Staff support has been
provided by the Manager of Community Services to date.
Recommended Structure:
As per the attached TOR, staff recommends that SKT be formed as a Task Group for a period of
three years, and that the Task Group be re-assessed following that term to determine whether or
not there is a need to continue this work. Timing for this assessment will be after the next round
of survey work, which will assist in informing this decision.
During the three year term of the Task Group, staff support would be provided at a Recreation
Coordinator level, overseen by the Manager of Community Services. The role of the staff liaison
would include committee guidance, research, survey responsibilities, community mobilization,
sponsorship recruitment, budget management, and making linkages to appropriate community
agencies or services, similar to support provided to other committees.
Determining a staff support structure will require a review of current Recreation Coordinator
responsibilities to determine the best approach. One suggestion may be to re-allocate Core
Security oversight from Youth Services to Protective Services to free up staff time to support SKT
while also ensuring that we maintain a strong focus on services that support youth. Such a
change may have operating budget implications. Staff would bring a future report to Council on
this topic to ensure that support to the above team and work areas is adequately resourced.
The financial contribution that this committee will require is $2,000 to fund clerical support and
$10,000 per year to host three annual community forums, information gathering, stakeholder
mobilization and evaluation, for a total of $12,000 per year. This estimate is based on the
3
actual cost of past forums and includes facility rental, technology support, participant materials
and refreshments, facilitator expenses, and other associated costs.
Committee Purpose:
The City of Maple Ridge, through the Youth Strategy and survey work, identified a gap in services
for emerging adult (ages 19-24). The SKT is focused on narrowing this existing gap through
research, programming, community dialogues, sponsorship recruitment, advocacy, and
workshops that support this important demographic.
In addition, the SKT will continue to liaise and partner with agencies, and organizations that
support the resiliency of families, children, youth and emerging adults to ensure a continuum of
support for our citizens from birth through adulthood. This includes: School District No. 42,
Maple Ridge Social Policy Advisory Committee, Middle Childhood Matters (MCM), Early Childhood
Development (ECD) and Maple Ridge/Pitt Meadows Community Services.
SKT Feedback:
Staff worked with the current members of the SKT to develop the attached draft Terms of
Reference for Council’s review so SKT recommendations are reflected in this document. One
additional recommendation that staff have included is that the Task Group be chaired and co-
chaired alternatively by the School District No. 42 Board of Education representative and the
Maple Ridge Council representative. This will ensure equal responsibility and representation and
allow for an alternative Chair option if needed.
b) Desired Outcome:
That Council review the attached draft TOR and provide input and direction regarding the
formation of the Strong Kids Task Group.
c) Strategic Alignment:
This recommendation aligns with the Maple Ridge Youth Strategy endorsed by Council in October
2016 (attached).
In addition, this recommendation aligns with the Committees of Council Policy No. 3.11
(attached). This policy includes the following as points of consideration when a new committee
or task group is being formed:
a) What work needs to be done, or what issues need to be considered by the committee?
b) Is the work on-going, or of a more time limited nature? What are the timelines?
c) Is there a need for public involvement? Why? Who needs to be involved?
d) Are there existing groups within the District or the community who could undertake the work
or consider the issues?
e) What is the capacity for funding the committee and providing staff support?
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
An increased awareness of children, youth and emerging adult trends in our community and
support to our community to respond quickly to address those trends.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
Support from a Municipal Clerk to provide clerical duties such as agenda distribution, facility
bookings and record management.
4
f) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
The Financial Plan would need to be amended to include an annual allotment of $12,000 for
clerical support and program delivery.
g) Alternatives:
If Council chooses not to endorse the recommendation outlined in this report, staff have
provided the following alternatives for Council’s consideration:
1. To defer a decision to coincide with a fuller discussion on the Youth Strategy that will be
brought back to Council later this year.
2. To refer the work of the Strong Kids Team to the Social Policy Advisory Committee to discuss
an alternate approach.
3. To conclude the Strong Kids Team at this time.
CONCLUSIONS:
This report provides Council with a recommendation to continue the work of the Strong Kids Team
within a Task Group format. This structure will allow for a clear mandate and direction from Council
as well as an efficient and direct reporting framework. Operating and staff resource requirements to
support this work are outlined in the report. Alternatively, Council feedback could inform an
alternative approach.
”Original signed by Tony Cotroneo”
Prepared by: Tony Cotroneo, Manager, Community Services
”Original signed by Wendy McCormick”
Reviewed by: Wendy McCormick, Director of Recreation
”Original signed by Trevor Thompson”
Reviewed by: Trevor Thompson, Manager of Financial Planning
”Original signed by Kelly Swift”
Approved by: Kelly Swift, General Manager, Parks, Recreation & Culture
”Original signed by E.C. Swabey”
Concurrence: E.C. Swabey
Chief Administrative Officer
tc:
Attachments:
Strong Kids Team Terms of Reference
Youth Strategy
City of Maple Ridge Policy 3.11
Terms of Reference
For
The Maple Ridge Strong Kids Team
Strong Kids Team Terms of Reference 2
1.Mandate
The Maple Ridge Strong Kids Team (SKT)is a responsive project-based task group
focused on emerging regional and local trends focused on meaningfully engaging the
community in a dialogue and activities to support the resilience of all children, youth and
emerging adults now and in the future.
2.Functions
Work with Maple Ridge Youth Services and Community Partners to deliver a survey
every three years that is geared to children, youth and emerging adults.The surveys
will inform on local and regional trends pertaining to youth needs.
Work with Maple Ridge Youth Services and Community Partners to deliver a survey
geared to parents, legal guardians, caregivers and service providers every three
years.These surveys will allow us to gage the understanding or gap between the
caregivers and youth and allow us to understand the needs of the caregivers.
Identify the top three priorities from each survey and deliver a minimal of two
community information sessions or workshops annually.
Support the Social Policy Advisory Committee (SPAC)and the City of Maple Ridge with
the implementation of the Maple Ridge Youth Strategy.
Recognize barriers and enablers to healthy lifestyles for children,youth and emerging
adults and assist in developing initiatives to address them.
Monitor trends in the health and well-being of children, youth and emerging adults
and mobilize appropriate service providers to address them.
Continue to focus on the prevention of youth homelessness, addiction and mental
health.
Meet annually with District Student Advisory Council (DSAC)to collect feedback and
input.
Provide an annual report to City Council to review the previous year’s work and
discuss goals for the coming year.
3.Role of individual group members
The role of the individual members of the Maple Ridge SKT includes:
Attend meetings as required and actively participate in the group’s work.
Represent the interests of Council,the Board of Education’s priorities as appropriate.
Demonstrate a genuine interest in the initiatives and the priorities being pursued by
the group.
Being an advocate for the SKT priorities.
Being committed to and actively involved in pursuing the SK T and Council’s priorities.
Strong Kids Team Terms of Reference 3
4.General
4.1.Membership
One School District No.42 Board of Education representative.
One City of Maple Ridge Council representative.
Two local youth representatives.
One City of Maple Ridge staff liaison (non-voting).
One School District No.42 staff liaison (non-voting).
Project based representatives as needed.
4.2.Chair/Convenor
The group will be chaired and co-chaired alternatively by the School District No.42
representative or the Maple Ridge Council representative.Meetings will occur bi-monthly
and be convened by the Chair and supported by the Co-chair.
4.3.Agenda items
SKT will operate with a standing agenda and special agenda items will be forwarded
to the City liaison by close of business five working days prior to the next scheduled
meeting.Agenda items may be submitted by voting and non-voting members.
The agenda, with attached meeting papers,will be distributed at least five working
days prior to the next scheduled meeting.
4.4.Minutes and meeting papers
The minutes of each SKT meeting will be prepared by the City of Maple Ridge Clerks
Department.
Full copies of the minutes, including attachments,will be provided to all SKT
members no later than five working days following each meeting.
By agreement of the group, out-of-session decisions will be deemed acceptable.
Where agreed by all members, all out-of-session decisions will be recorded in the
minutes of the next scheduled meeting.
4.5.Frequency of meetings
The SKT will meet bi-monthly and as required.
4.6.Review
Will meet with School District No.42 annually..
Will report annually to City Council.
1city of maple ridge youth strategyplanning design engagement
To support, engage, and empower
our youth and emerging adults
Click for complete report
Page 1 of 6 Policy 3.11
POLICY POLICY POLICY POLICY MANUALMANUALMANUALMANUAL
Title: Title: Title: Title: Committees of CouncilCommittees of CouncilCommittees of CouncilCommittees of Council
See also Council and Staff Liaison Roles Policy No. 3.10
Policy No : Policy No : Policy No : Policy No : 3.113.113.113.11
Supersedes: Supersedes: Supersedes: Supersedes: NewNewNewNew
Authority:Authority:Authority:Authority: Legislative Legislative Legislative Legislative OperationalOperationalOperationalOperational
Approval:Approval:Approval:Approval: Council Council Council Council CMT CMT CMT CMT
General Manager General Manager General Manager General Manager
Effective Date:Effective Date:Effective Date:Effective Date: January 26, 2011January 26, 2011January 26, 2011January 26, 2011
Review Date:Review Date:Review Date:Review Date: 2012
Policy Statement:Policy Statement:Policy Statement:Policy Statement:
Advisory committees/commissions/panels, and task forces provide opportunities for citizens to
become more actively involved in their community, and for issues to be considered in depth.
The Council of the District of Maple Ridge will appoint advisory committees/commissions/
panels and task forces to:
• Provide information and advice to Council and staff on issues of concern to the public and
the District which Council will consider in its decision making
• Educate and raise the awareness of Council and staff; and
• Provide recommendations for consideration by Council and staff.
Unless authority to make decisions has been delegated by Council to a Committee or
Commission by bylaw, it is not the role of these bodies to establish policy, but to act in an
advisory capacity to Council. The decision-making responsibility and authority remains with
Council.
Purpose:Purpose:Purpose:Purpose:
To establish guidelines for the formation and operation of Committees of Council.
Definition:Definition:Definition:Definition:
CommitteeCommitteeCommitteeCommitteessss –––– Advisory committees, commissions and panels that provide on-going advice of a
policy nature. Committees may also include Task Forces that have responsibility to consider
issues within a bounded time period. Once finished their work, through resolution of Council,
task forces cease to exist.
Selection CommitteeSelection CommitteeSelection CommitteeSelection Committee – A committee comprised of the Mayor and/or the applicable committee
Council appointee(s) and staff liaison(s), if appointed, that reviews applications for committee
positions, interviews selected applicants and makes recommendations to Council on appointed
positions.
Page 2 of 6 Policy 3.11
KEY AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITYKEY AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITYKEY AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITYKEY AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY::::
Action to TakeAction to TakeAction to TakeAction to Take
1. FunctionsFunctionsFunctionsFunctions
The functions of the committees of Council are to:
a) respond to issues referred by Council and staff;
b) listen to and report on the community’s views;
c) gather necessary facts, information, and opinions;
d) educate and raise the awareness of Council and staff;
e) in the case of advisory committees/commissions/panels,
offer longer term visions of the community;;
f) provide advice and recommendations to Council, staff and
the public;
g) raise issues to Council and staff that need to be addressed
further.
2. Council ExpeCouncil ExpeCouncil ExpeCouncil Expectationsctationsctationsctations
Committees are expected to:
a) respond to the issues referred by Council and by staff;
b) within their mandates, raise issues to Council and staff
that committee members believe need to be addressed;
c) give well-considered and timely responses to Council's
need for advice;
d) work within the strategic directions as outlined in
Council's annual business plan;
e) prepare an annual business plan (excluding task forces);
f) carry out their work effectively, efficiently, and creatively.
3. Committee ExpectationsCommittee ExpectationsCommittee ExpectationsCommittee Expectations
Committees can expect from Council and staff:
a) Sufficient information on the issues being addressed;
b) consistent and effective staff support (where provided),
within the budgetary limits of the district;
c) orientation and training;
d) prompt feedback on the outcomes of their advice and
recommendation;
e) a commitment from Council to refer issues for committee
consideration as they arise.
4. Committee OpportunitiesCommittee OpportunitiesCommittee OpportunitiesCommittee Opportunities
Committees can expect opportunities to:
a) learn more about their community, and the issues that
need to be addressed;
b) engage with other people in dialogue and debate about
the community and its issues;
c) create broad visions of the community over the longer
term;
d) make recommendations to Council and staff.
Council acknowledges that it is vital that committee members
feel that they are making a real difference in the life of their
community.
ResponsibilityResponsibilityResponsibilityResponsibility
CouncilCouncilCouncilCouncil
StaffStaffStaffStaff
CouncilCouncilCouncilCouncil
Page 3 of 6 Policy 3.11
5. Governing LegislationGoverning LegislationGoverning LegislationGoverning Legislation
Committees will be governed by the bylaw (if any) of the
particular committee, the Council Procedure Bylaw and
applicable provincial and federal legislation.
6. New CommitteeNew CommitteeNew CommitteeNew Committee
In considering a new committee, Council will ask:
a) What work needs to be done, or what issues need to be
considered by the committee?
b) Is the work on-going, or of a more time limited nature?
What are the timelines?
c) Is there a need for public involvement? Why? Who needs to
be involved?
d) Are there existing groups within the District or the
community who could undertake the work or consider the
issues?
e) What is the capacity for funding the committee and
providing staff support?
In addition, Council will give consideration to the make up of
the committee in terms of skills, expertise, and the diversity of
interests required.
7.... MembershipMembershipMembershipMembership
Membership of committees of Council will be diverse, and
broadly reflective of the community (for example: age, gender,
cultural background, occupation, and neighbourhood, where
appropriate).
Membership of some committees will also reflect the desired
experience, knowledge and expertise.
Unless otherwise specified in a Committee’s bylaws or terms
of reference, members at large must reside or be employed in
the District and membership will be limited to no more than
three terms to permit others the opportunity to contribute.
8. AppointmentAppointmentAppointmentAppointment of Members at Largeof Members at Largeof Members at Largeof Members at Large
Opportunities for citizen participation on the committees of
Council will be advertised in a local newspaper, on the District
web site, on any other media deemed appropriate by the
Selection Committee and through community associations,
where appropriate, so that any citizen who is interested can
apply.
Candidates will be requested to submit an email or letter of
application providing information on their qualifications for
the position.
Even when a sitting member’s term is up and they have
indicated a willingness to continue their participation, others
should be given the opportunity to apply and be considered
alongside the sitting member. This is the only time that
Committee/Commission members are evaluated in terms of
their involvement and Council should have the opportunity to
CouncilCouncilCouncilCouncil
Clerk’s DepartmentClerk’s DepartmentClerk’s DepartmentClerk’s Department
Page 4 of 6 Policy 3.11
determine if other citizens should be appointed because their
background and skill set is more suitable to the upcoming
work of the Committee/Commission.
Members of Council may nominate individuals whom they
know are interested in serving on a respective committee.
Such nominees are to be advised that they will be required to
follow the same application procedures as others and will be
assessed against other candidates who have responded to
the advertisings.
The Clerk’s Department will prepare an alphabetical list of
applicants that will specify where an individual is a sitting
member of another Committee. If an individual applies for
more than one Committee, the Clerk’s Department will
identify with the applicant the most appropriate Committee.
Applications will be reviewed by the Selection Committee to
determine if an interview process is required and who will be
interviewed. Generally an interview will be required even if
there is only one candidate to ensure the candidate is
suitable for the position. Interviews should also be conducted
if a sitting member has reapplied and others have applied so
that fair consideration can be given to all candidates. The
Clerk’s Department will arrange the interviews.
Following the interviews, the Selection Committee will forward
a report to a Closed meeting of Council with their
recommendations for appointment to the Committee. The
report is to be accompanied by resumes of the candidates
under consideration. Council will vote to appoint members to
the committee and announce the results at a subsequent
Regular Council meeting. The term of the appointment will be
specified in the resolution. A full orientation will be provided to
new committee members.
Council may remove a member at any time.
In general, it is the policy of Council not to appoint any
individual to serve on more than one committee
simultaneously. It is the intent of Council to afford the
opportunity for as many interested citizens as possible to
serve on Committees.
9. Conflict of InterestConflict of InterestConflict of InterestConflict of Interest
A conflict of interest exists where:
a) a committee member is a director, member or employee
of an organization seeking a benefit from the District of
Maple Ridge upon which the committee will make a
recommendation;
b) the committee member has a direct or indirect pecuniary
interest in the outcome of committee deliberations.
Clerk’s DepartmentClerk’s DepartmentClerk’s DepartmentClerk’s Department
Selection CommitteeSelection CommitteeSelection CommitteeSelection Committee
Clerk’s DepartmentClerk’s DepartmentClerk’s DepartmentClerk’s Department
Selection CommitteeSelection CommitteeSelection CommitteeSelection Committee
CouncilCouncilCouncilCouncil
Page 5 of 6 Policy 3.11
A conflict of interest does not exist if:
a) the pecuniary interest of the member is a pecuniary
interest in common with members of the municipality
generally, or
b) the pecuniary interest is so remote or insignificant that it
cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to influence the
member in relation to the matter.
Where a conflict of interest exists, committee members:
a) are not entitled to participate in the discussion of the
matter or to vote on a question in respect of the matter;
b) must declare to the committee that a conflict exists; and
c) must absent themselves from the meeting during
consideration of the issue to which the conflict relates.
The member’s declaration of a conflict and their exit from and
return to the meeting shall be noted in the minutes.
Where a perceived conflict of interest might exist, the member
may note that a perception of conflict might exist but need not
declare a conflict and exit the meeting if in the member’s view
there is no actual conflict of interest.
Where in the opinion of a committee a member is in a conflict
of interest and has not so declared, the committee may ask
for a review of the matter by the Corporate Officer. The
matter, if unresolved, may then be referred for Council review.
10. Council Council Council Council AppointeeAppointeeAppointeeAppointee
Council will appoint at least one Council member and an
alternate to the Committee. The role of the appointee
includes:
a) ensuring that Council is adequately briefed as to the
development of issues;
b) communicating Council's position and policy;
c) facilitating a clear and open dialogue between Council
and the community committee;
d) clarifying when they are stating their personal opinions.
See also Council and Staff Liaison Roles Policy No. 3.10
11. Staff Staff Staff Staff Liaison Liaison Liaison Liaison
The Chief Administrative Officer may provide staff support on
a case-by-case basis. The role of staff in supporting
committees of Council includes:
a) providing information and professional advice;
b) supporting the chairperson in developing agendas,
arranging meetings, and promoting effective committee
functioning;
Committee MembersCommittee MembersCommittee MembersCommittee Members
Council Council Council Council AppointeeAppointeeAppointeeAppointee
Staff LiaisonStaff LiaisonStaff LiaisonStaff Liaison
Page 6 of 6 Policy 3.11
c) assisting with the preparation reports to Council;
d) assisting with the creation of the annual Business Plan;
e) providing an annual orientation to Committee members
on the work of the committee, the structure of the District,
and Council’s annual Business Plan and budgeting
process.
12. ReportingReportingReportingReporting
The committees of Council are appointed by and report
directly to Council.
a) They are consultative groups.
b) Council has the responsibility for making final decisions.
c) Committee members will not misrepresent themselves as
having any authority beyond that delegated by Council.
13. ReportReportReportReportinginginging to Councilto Councilto Councilto Council
When responding to an issue that was referred by Council,
committees will submit reports directly to Council.
Committees will report to Council on their activities at least
twice a year either in writing or by appearing as a delegation
at a meeting of Council.
14. Annual Business ReportsAnnual Business ReportsAnnual Business ReportsAnnual Business Reports
The committees of Council, with the exception of Task Forces,
will annually submit a Business Plan to Council that is in
alignment with Council’s strategic directions. The format of
the plan and timelines for submissions will be provided to the
committees.
15. . . . MinutesMinutesMinutesMinutes
Committee minutes, which record the decisions made at
meetings, will be submitted to the Clerk’s Department.
Council and the Chief Administrative Officer will consider
providing clerical support on a case-by-case basis.
CommitteeCommitteeCommitteeCommittee