HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-10-24 Council Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfPage 1
City of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
October 24, 2017
7:00 p.m.
Council Chamber
Note: This Agenda is also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
The purpose of a Council meeting is to enact powers given to Council by using bylaws
or resolutions. This is the final venue for debate of issues before voting on a bylaw or
resolution.
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
401 Minutes of Council Meetings
•Special Council Meeting of October 3, 2017
•Special Council Meeting of October 10, 2017
•Regular Council Meeting of October 10, 2017
•Special Council Meeting of October 17, 2017
402 Minutes to the Public Hearing of October 17, 2017
500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
MEETING DECORUM
Council would like to remind all people present tonight that serious issues are
decided at Council meetings which affect many people’s lives. Therefore, we ask that
you act with the appropriate decorum that a Council Meeting deserves. Commentary
and conversations by the public are distracting. Should anyone disrupt the Council
Meeting in any way, the meeting will be stopped and that person’s behavior will be
reprimanded. The meeting is live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge.
Council Meeting Agenda
October 24, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 2 of 9
600 DELEGATIONS
601 Ridge Meadows Recycling Society – Waste Reduction Week
•Leanne Koehn, Community Engagement
602 Construction of a New Indoor Pool in East Maple Ridge
•Linda Meyer, A.A.B.A.P.B.D., Legal Representative/Legal Advocate
603 Businesses and Homeowners are Frustrated with Tent City
•Mark Lancaster, North Fraser Automotive Repair Ltd.
700 ITEMS ON CONSENT
701 Minutes
701.1 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of October
11, 2017
701.2 Minutes of Meetings of Committees and Commissions of Council
•Community Heritage Commission – September 14, 2017
702 Reports
702.1 2017 Council Expenses
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 providing an update on Council
expenses recorded to date.
702.2 Disbursements for the month ended September 30, 2017
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that the
disbursements for the month ended September 30, 2017 be received for
information.
702.3 Adjustments to the 2016 and 2017 Collector’s Roll
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 submitting information on changes to
the 2016 and 2017 Collector’s Roll through the issuance of Supplementary
Rolls 3 through 6.
702.4 Pitt Meadows Airport – Strategic Framework
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 provided information on a strategic
framework for the Pitt Meadows Airport.
Council Meeting Agenda
October 24, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 3 of 9
702.5 Ridge Meadows Minor Lacrosse Outdoor Box Follow Up
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 providing information on a potential
location for a new lacrosse box, costing information and a development
timeline.
703 Correspondence
704 Release of Items from Closed Council Status
800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
900 CORRESPONDENCE
901 Support for Alouette River Management Society (“ARMS”) Proposal entitled
“Alouette Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility” Plan
E-mail from Greta Borick-Cunningham, Executive Director, ARMS,
requesting a letter of support from the City of Maple Ridge for a funding
application to BC Hydro’s Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program (Coastal
Region).
1000 BYLAWS
Note: Items 1001 to 1004 are from the October 17, 2017 Public Hearing
Bylaws for Third Reading
1001 2015-327-RZ, 21710 and 21728 Lougheed Highway
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7196-2015
To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to C-2 (Community
Commercial), the current application is to permit the future construction of
a Gold’s Gym
Third reading
1002 2016-109-RZ, 21137 River Road
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7249-2016
To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-1 (Two Family
Urban Residential), the current application is to permit the development of
a duplex
Third reading
Council Meeting Agenda
October 24, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 4 of 9
1003 2016-066-RZ, 24240 125 Avenue
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7239-2016
To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential), the current application is to permit a future
subdivision of 2 lots
Third reading
1004 2016-244-RZ, 11184, 11154 and 11080 240 Street
1004.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7381-2017
To amend Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan, Schedule 1: Albion
Area Plan from Neighbourhood Commercial, Medium Density Residential
and Conservation to Village Commercial, Medium Density Residential and
Conservation and to amend Schedule “C” of the Official Community Plan to
remove from Conservation and to add to Conservation
Third reading
1004.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7276-2016
To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse
Residential) and C-5 (Village Centre Commercial), the current application is
to permit the future construction of a 130 unit townhouse development
and a 905 square metre commercial building with residential uses on the
second story
Third reading
Bylaws for Adoption
1005 2013-086-RZ, 13704 232 Street
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending adoption of bylaws as
amended
1005.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7160-2015
To revise land use designation boundaries and an equestrian trail location
Adoption
1005.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013
To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), RST-SV (Street
Townhouse – Silver Valley), RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density]
Residential), P-1 (Park and School), R-1 (Residential District) and C-5
(Village Centre Commercial) to permit a future subdivision of 42 single
family lots, 16 street townhouse lots, one commercial lot, and a
neighbourhood park
Adoption
Council Meeting Agenda
October 24, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 5 of 9
1005.3 13704 232 Street Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7295-2016
To restrict two units as rental units in perpetuity
Adoption
1006 232A Street Local Area Service Bylaw No. 7393-2017
To permit enhanced landscape maintenance of bioswales along newly
proposed 232A Street and some riparian planting along 232 Street and
132 Avenue
Adoption
1100 REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Public Works and Development Services
1101 2017-155-RZ, 21319 and 21333 Lougheed Highway, RS-1 to C-2
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7358-2017 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit development of a
two-storey commercial building be given first reading and that the applicant
provide further information as described on Schedules C, D and E of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
1102 2017-242-RZ, Home Occupation Regulations Zone Amending Bylaw
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7394-2017 to amend the home occupation
regulations of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 be given first
reading and be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission for
comment.
1103 2017-318-RZ, 12842 Alouette Road, RS-3 to RS-2
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7379-2017 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to allow a
subdivision of three single family lots be given first reading and that the
applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, C, F and
J of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with the
information required for a Subdivision application.
Council Meeting Agenda
October 24, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 6 of 9
1104 2015-347-RZ, 20621 123 Avenue, RS-3 to RS-1b
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7383-2017 to adjust a
conservation boundary around a watercourse be given first and second
readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7193-2015 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to
permit a future subdivision of approximately 10 lots be given second
reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
1105 2016-336-RZ, 11300 and 11250 240 Street, RS-3 to RM-1 and R-2
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7396-2017 to amend the
conservation boundary be given first and second readings and be
forwarded to Public Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw
No. 7287-2016 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1
(Townhouse Residential) and R-2 (Urban Residential District) to permit a
future subdivision of 5 lots and construction of a 54 unit townhouse
development be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
1106 2017-291-RZ, 24093 and 24137 104 Avenue and PID 009-437-061, RS-3
and RS-2 to P-1
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7369-2017 to re-designate
from Medium Density Residential and Institutional to Institutional and
Conservation be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public
Hearing and that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7364-2017 to
rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) to P-1 (Park and School) to permit development of
an elementary school and community centre be given first and second
readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing.
1107 2016-191-RZ, 11939 240 Street, CS-1 to C-2
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7257-2016 to rezone from CS-1 (Service Commercial)
to C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit future construction of a multi-
tenant commercial development be given second reading and be forwarded
to Public Hearing.
Council Meeting Agenda
October 24, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 7 of 9
1108 2016-008-DVP, 24021 110 Avenue
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-008-DVP to increase maximum
building height, reduce front yard setbacks, reduce rear yard setbacks,
reduce exterior side setbacks, reduce interior side setbacks for various
units and increase maximum height for retaining walls.
1109 2017-323-DVP, 23055 117 Avenue
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-323-DVP to reduce the
required lot width for Lots 1 and 2.
1110 2016-347-DP, 24021 110 Avenue, Intensive Residential Development
Permit
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-347-DP to permit eight R-3
(Special Amenity Residential District) zoned lots.
1111 Sign Control Bylaw No. 7008-2013
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that the three readings
given to Sign Control Bylaw No. 7008-2013 be rescinded.
1112 Proposed New Sign Control Bylaw No. 7389-2017
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Sign
Bylaw No. 7389-2017 be given first reading and that the public process
outlined in the report be supported.
Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police)
1131 Financial Plan and Council Work Plan
Staff report dated October 24, 2017 recommending that staff be directed
to bring forward the 2018-2022 Financial Plan for consideration and that
the Council Work Schedule Matrix to March 2018 be endorsed.
Parks, Recreation & Culture
1151
Council Meeting Agenda
October 24, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 8 of 9
Administration
1171
Other Committee Issues
1191
1200 STAFF REPORTS
1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT
1400 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETING
1500 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Council Meeting Agenda
October 24, 2017
Council Chamber
Page 9 of 9
1600 ADJOURNMENT
Checked by:________________
Date: ________________
QUESTION PERIOD
The purpose of the Question Period is to provide the public with an opportunity to
ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of
Public Hearing bylaws which have not yet reached conclusion.
Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff
members.
Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to ask their question (a second
opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium).
Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to individual
members of Council. The total Question Period is limited to 15 minutes.
Council reserves the right to defer responding to a question in order to obtain the
information required to provide a complete and accurate response.
Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings,
delegations and community forum. The public may also make their views known to
Council by writing or via email and by attending open houses, workshops and
information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to
have a voice in the future of this community.
For more information on these opportunities contact:
Clerk’s Department at 604-463-5221 or clerks@mapleridge.ca.
Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca.
400 Adoption and Receipt of Minutes
400
401 Minutes of Regular and Special Council Meetings
401
City of Maple Ridge
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
October 3, 2017
The Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held on October 3, 2017 at 5:30
p.m. in the Blaney Room of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British
Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business.
0BPRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Mayor N. Read P. Gill, Chief Administrative Officer
Councillor C. Bell K. Swift, General Manager of Parks, Recreation & Culture
Councillor Duncan F. Quinn, General Manager of Public Works and
Councillor B. Masse Development Services
Councillor Robson L. Darcus, Manager of Legislative Services
Councillor Speirs A. Gaunt, Confidential Secretary
Councillor Shymkiw Other staff as required
F. King, Director of Human Resources
Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
Note: Councillor Duncan participated in the meeting via telephone.
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
2.0 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
R/2017-435
It was moved and seconded
That the agenda for the October 4, 2017 Special Council Meeting be
approved.
CARRIED
Special Council Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2017
Page 2 of 2
3.0 NOTICE OF CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING
R/2017-436
It was moved and seconded
That the meeting following this meeting at 6:00 p.m. be closed to the public
pursuant to Sections 90 (1) and 90 (2) of the Community Charter as the
subject matter being considered relates to the following:
Section 90(1)(c) Labour relations or employee negotiations.
Any other matter that may be brought before the Council that meets the
requirements for a meeting closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1)
and 90 (2) of the Community Charter or Freedom of Information and
Protection of Privacy Act.
CARRIED
4.0 ADJOURNMENT –.
_______________________________
N. Read, Mayor
Certified Correct
___________________________________
L. Darcus, Corporate Officer
City of Maple Ridge
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
October 10, 2017
The Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held on October 10, 2017 at 6:00
p.m. in the Blaney Room of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British
Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business.
0BPRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Mayor N. Read P. Gill, Chief Administrative Officer
Councillor C. Bell K. Swift, General Manager of Parks, Recreation & Culture
Councillor Duncan F. Quinn, General Manager of Public Works and
Councillor B. Masse Development Services
Councillor Robson L. Darcus, Manager of Legislative Services
Councillor Speirs Other staff as required
Councillor Shymkiw
Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
2.0 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
R/2017-445
It was moved and seconded
That the agenda for the October 10, 2017 Special Council Meeting be
approved.
CARRIED
Special Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 2 of 2
3.0 NOTICE OF CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING
R/2017-446
It was moved and seconded
That the meeting following this meeting at 6:00 p.m. be closed to the public
pursuant to Sections 90 (1) and 90 (2) of the Community Charter as the
subject matter being considered relates to the following:
Section 90(1)(f) Law enforcement, if the council considers that
disclosure might reasonably be expected to harm the
conduct of an investigation under or enforcement of
an enactment.
Section 90(1)(g) Litigation or potential litigation affecting the
municipality.
Section 90(1)(i) The receipt of advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that
purpose.
Section 90(2)(b) The consideration of information received and held in
confidence relating to negotiations between the
municipality and a provincial government.
Any other matter that may be brought before the Council that meets the
requirements for a meeting closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1)
and 90 (2) of the Community Charter or Freedom of Information and
Protection of Privacy Act.
CARRIED
4.0 ADJOURNMENT –.
_______________________________
N. Read, Mayor
Certified Correct
___________________________________
L. Darcus, Corporate Officer
City of Maple Ridge
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
October 10, 2017
The Minutes of the City Council Meeting held on October 10, 2017 at 7:15 p.m. in
the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British
Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business.
0BPRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Mayor N. Read P. Gill, Chief Administrative Officer
Councillor C. Bell D. Boag, Acting General Manager of Parks, Recreation
Councillor K. Duncan & Culture
Councillor B. Masse F. Quinn, General Manager Public Works and Development
Councillor G. Robson Services
Councillor T. Shymkiw C. Carter, Director of Planning
Councillor C. Speirs L. Darcus, Manager of Legislative Services
A. Gaunt, Confidential Secretary
Other staff as required
C. Goddard, Manager of Development and Environmental
Services
D. Pollock, Municipal Engineer
M. Baski, Planner 1
C. Chan, Planner 1
D. Hall, Planner 2
A. Kopystynski, Planner 2
D. Denton, Property and Risk Manager
Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
The meeting was live streamed and recorded by the City of Maple Ridge
100 CALL TO ORDER
200 AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
300 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
The agenda was approved as circulated
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 2 of 22
400 ADOPTION AND RECEIPT OF MINUTES
401 Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of September 19, 2017
R/2017-447
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of September 19, 2017
be adopted as circulated.
CARRIED
402 Minutes of the Public Hearing of September 19, 2017
R/2017-448
It was moved and seconded
That the minutes of the Public Hearing of September 19, 2017 be adopted
as circulated.
CARRIED
500 PRESENTATIONS AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL
Note: Councillor Shymkiw joined the meeting at 7:18 p.m.
600 DELEGATIONS
601 Ridge Meadows Special Olympics Program
• Marc Fisher, Co-Local Coordinator, Ridge Meadows Special Olympics
Mr. Fisher gave a PowerPoint presentation providing information on the
Ridge Meadows Special Olympics Program. He highlighted the mandate of
the organization, the programs provided, the participants in the programs
and the events and activities which have taken place. Mr. Fisher outlined
the importance of the involvement of volunteers in the Special Olympics
Program and the benefits the program brings to the community.
602 Friends in Need Food Bank - School Meal Snack Program and Perishable
Food Recovery Program
• Mary Robson, Executive Director
Mrs. Robson gave a background and history on the Friends in Need Food
Bank, advising that the local Friends in Need Food Bank is a member of
Food Banks Canada and BC and adheres to a code of ethics and
standards. She emphasized the importance of volunteers to the
organizations.
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 3 of 22
Mrs. Robson highlighted the School Meal Snack Program and advised on
how it is run with the involvement of the Friends in Need Food Bank and
schools in the community. She advised on funding received which has
enabled the Food Bank to purchase a refrigerator van which in turn has
initiated a new Perishable Food Recovery Program. On behalf of directors,
staff and volunteers, Mrs. Robson thanked the City of Maple Ridge for the
grant provided to allow for the new program.
700 ITEMS ON CONSENT
701 Minutes
701.1 Minutes of the Development Agreements Committee Meetings of
September 19 and 28, 2017
701.2 Minutes of Meetings of Committees and Commissions of Council
• Advisory Design Panel – July 19, 2017
• Community Heritage Commission – June 8, 2017
• Economic Development Committee – September 13, 2017
• Environmental Advisory Committee – July 12, 2017
• Public Art Steering Committee – July 25, 2017
702 Reports - Nil
703 Correspondence
703.1 Metro Vancouver – Proposed Amendments to the GVS&DD Fraser
Sewerage Area Boundary
Letter dated September 25, 2017 from Chris Plagnol, Corporate Officer,
Metro Vancouver providing information on proposed amendments to the
GVS&DD Fraser Sewerage Area Boundary requested by the City of Maple
Ridge.
704 Release of Items from Closed Council Status – Nil
R/2017-449
It was moved and seconded
That Items 701.1, 701.2 and 703.1 on the “Items on Consent” agenda be
approved.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 4 of 22
800 UNFINISHED BUSINESS – Nil
900 CORRESPONDENCE – Nil
1000 BYLAWS
Bylaws for Third Reading
Note: Item 1001 was deferred at the June 25, 2017 Council Meeting
1001 2016-352-RZ, 23004 Dewdney Trunk Road
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending third reading
1001.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7288-2016
To amend Schedule “B” of the Official Community Plan from Urban
Residential to Commercial
Third reading
1001.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7289-2016
To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to C-2 (Community
Commercial) to permit a future medical clinic and pharmacy with two rental
units above
Third reading
M. Baski, Planner provided clarification on provisions for additional parking
R/2017-450
It was moved and seconded
1. That Bylaw No. 7288-2016 be given third reading;
2. That Bylaw No. 7289-2016 be given third reading; and
3. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive
Covenant and receipt of the deposit of a security, as outlined in
the Agreement;
ii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule "B";
iii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the Visitor
Parking;
iv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the
Stormwater Management Plan;
v) Registration of a Housing Agreement in accordance with Section
483 of the Local Government Act and a Restrictive Covenant
stating that the two residential units above the commercial
ground floor will be restricted to residential rental units; and
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 5 of 22
vi) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be
submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is
any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject
property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to
ensure that the subject property is not a contaminated site
CARRIED
Bylaws for Adoption
1002 2016-052-RZ, 22260 and 22292 122 Avenue, 12159 and 12167 223
Street
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending adoption
1002.1 Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7243-2016
12159 and 12167 223 Street
To designate from Single Family Residential to Low-Rise Apartment
Adoption
R/2017-451
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7243-2016 be adopted.
CARRIED
Councillor Shymkiw - OPPOSED
1002.2 Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7244-2016
22260 and 22292 122 Avenue and 12159 and 12167 223 Street
To rezone from LUC (Land Use Contracts) Registration #H33588 &
#P108265 and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RM-2 (Medium
Density Apartment Residential) and terminate Land Use Contracts
Registration numbers #33588 and #P108265
Adoption
R/2017-452
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7244-2016 be adopted.
CARRIED
Councillor Shymkiw - OPPOSED
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 6 of 22
1002.3 22260 & 22292 122 Avenue, 12159 & 12167 223 Street Housing
Agreement Bylaw No. 7359-2017
To allow the City of Maple Ridge to enter into a Housing Agreement to
secure new dwelling units as rental housing in perpetuity
Adoption
R/2017-453
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7359-2017 be adopted.
CARRIED
Councillor Shymkiw - OPPOSED
1003 2013-107-SD, Fern Crescent Local Area Service Bylaw No. 7382-2017
To authorize enhanced landscape costs to be levied on the benefitting
properties
Adoption
R/2017-454
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7382-2017 be adopted.
CARRIED
1004 Maple Ridge Tax Exemption Bylaw No. 7368-2017
To exempt certain types of properties from municipal property taxation
Adoption
R/2017-455
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7368-2017 be adopted.
CARRIED
1100 COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Public Works and Development Services
1101 2017-124-RZ, 12516, 12555, 12599 240 Street and 12511 241 Street,
RS-3 to RS-2
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7343-2017 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to create a 31 lot
subdivision and a 1.2 hectare (3 acre) park dedication be given first
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 7 of 22
reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on
Schedules A, B, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-
1999, along with information required for a Subdivision application.
D. Hall, Planner gave a PowerPoint presentation providing the following
information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Official Community Plan Context
• Neighbourhood Plan Context
• Site Characteristics
• Development Proposal
• Proposed Site Plan
• Density Bonus
Derek Ray, Northwest Hydaulics Consultants
Mr. Ray provided clarification on the report he prepared to describe
changes to flood levels resulting from the proposed development.
Don Bowins, DK Bowins & Associates
Mr. Bowins addressed questions and concerns pertaining to the proposed
development possibly being built in flood plain.
R/2017-456
It was moved and seconded
In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for
consultation during the development or amendment of an Official
Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required
with specifically:
i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the
plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered
by the plan;
iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by
the plan;
iv. First Nations;
v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District
Boards; and
vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be
required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed
Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s website, together with
an invitation to the public to comment, and;
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 8 of 22
That Bylaw No. 7343-2017 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules
A, B, F, and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999,
along with the information required for a Subdivision application.
CARRIED
Councillor Robson – OPPOSED
1102 2017-140-RZ, 23953 Fern Crescent, RS-2 to RS-1b
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7390-2017 to rezone from RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density]
Residential) to allow a subdivision of four single family lots be given first
reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on
Schedules A, C and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-
1999, along with information required for a Subdivision application.
R/2017-457
It was moved and seconded
In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for
consultation during the development or amendment of an Official
Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required
with specifically:
i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the
plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered
by the plan;
iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by
the plan;
iv. First Nations;
v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District
Boards; and
vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be
required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed
Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s website, together with
an invitation to the public to comment, and;
That Bylaw No. 7390-2017 be given first reading; and
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 9 of 22
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules
A, C and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along
with the information required for a Subdivision application.
CARRIED
1103 2017-161-RZ, 22362 St. Anne Avenue, RS-1 to CRM
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7384-2017 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to CRM (Commercial/Residential) to permit a four storey, 40
unit apartment building plus one penthouse unit be given first reading and
that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C,
D, and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
R/2017-458
It was moved and seconded
That Bylaw No. 7384-2017 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules
C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999.
CARRIED
1104 2017-184-RZ, 23585 128 Avenue, Text Amendment
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7392-2017 to allow a text amendment to the RS-2
(One Family Suburban Residential) zone with density provisions to create a
5 lot subdivision be given first reading and that the applicant provide
further information as described on Schedules A, B, F and G of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with information
required for a Subdivision application.
D. Hall, Planner gave a PowerPoint presentation providing the following
information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Official Community Plan Context
• Neighbourhood Plan Context
• Site Characteristics
• Development Proposal
• Proposed Site Plan
• Density Bonus
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 10 of 22
R/2017-459
It was moved and seconded
In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for
consultation during the development or amendment of an Official
Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required
with specifically:
i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the
plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area
covered by the plan;
iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered
by the plan;
iv. First Nations;
v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District
Boards; and
vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be
required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed
Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s website, together with
an invitation to the public to comment, and;
That Bylaw No. 7392-2017 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules
A, B, F and G of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along
with the information required for a Subdivision application.
CARRIED
1105 2017-271-RZ, 11970 Glenhurst Street, RS-3 to RT-1
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7361-2017 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) to permit the
development of a duplex be given first reading and that the applicant
provide further information as described on Schedule C of the Development
Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999.
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 11 of 22
R/2017-460
It was moved and seconded
1. That Bylaw No. 7361-2017 be given first reading; and
2. That the applicant provide further information as described on
Schedule C of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999.
CARRIED
1106 2017-306-RZ, 22229 Brown Avenue, CD-1-00 to RM-2
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7366-2017 to rezone from CD-1-00 (Seniors
Apartment and Private Hospital) to RM-2 (Medium Density Apartment
Residential) to permit three 5-storey, 233 unit condominium buildings be
given first reading and the applicant provide further information as
described on Schedules C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw
No. 5879-1999.
C. Chan, Planner gave a PowerPoint presentation providing the following
information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Official Community Plan Context
• Neighbourhood Plan Context
• Site Characteristics
• Development Proposal
• Proposed Site Plan
R/2017-461
It was moved and seconded
1. That Bylaw No. 7366-2017 be given first reading; and
2. That the applicant provide further information as described on
Schedules C, D and E of the Development Procedures Bylaw No.
5879–1999.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 12 of 22
1107 2017-319-RZ, 13589 232 Street, RS-3 to RS-1b
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7387-2017 to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to
allow for a five lot single family subdivision be given first reading and that
the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B, F,
G and J of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with
information required for a Subdivision application.
R/2017-462
It was moved and seconded
In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for
consultation during the development or amendment of an Official
Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required
with specifically:
i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the
plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered
by the plan;
iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by
the plan;
iv. First Nations;
v. Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District
Boards; and
vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be
required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed
Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s website, together with
an invitation to the public to comment, and;
That Bylaw No. 7387-2017 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules
A, B, F, G and J of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999,
along with the information required for a Subdivision application.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 13 of 22
1108 2017-320-RZ, 12327 203 Street, RS-1 to R-1
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7380-2017 to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to R-1 (Residential District) to permit a two lot subdivision and
construction of two single family dwellings be given first reading and that
the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C and
D of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, along with
information required for a Subdivision application.
R/2017-463
It was moved and seconded
1. That Bylaw No. 7380-2017 be given first reading; and
2. That the applicant provide further information as described on
Schedules C and D of the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–
1999, along with the information required for a Subdivision
application.
CARRIED
1109 2013-086-RZ, 13704 232 Street, Housing Agreement Bylaw
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that a Housing
Agreement be authorized along with its accompany covenant and that
13704 232 Street Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7295-2016 to restrict two
units as rental units in perpetuity be given first, second and third reading.
R/2017-464
It was moved and seconded
1. That a Housing Agreement, under the provisions of Section 483 of the
Local Government Act, R.S.B.C 1996, c. 323 be authorized along with
its accompanying covenant; and
2. That Bylaw No. 7295-2016 be given first, second and third readings.
CARRIED
1110 2016-052-DVP, 22260 and 22292 122 Avenue, 12159 and 12167 223
Street
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-052-DVP to vary exterior side
yard, rear yard, interior side yard and front yard setbacks and to reduce
parking requirements.
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 14 of 22
The Manager of Legislative Services advised that correspondence opposed
to the application due to lack of parking was received from Lina B (no full
name), Phil Della, Kim Parkhill, Donna Lawson and Michael Claffey
The Director of Planning and the Manager of Development and
Environmental Services addressed questions and concerns related to the
variance to reduce parking requirements.
Chris Quigley, Amacon Representative
Mr. Quigley provided clarification on the number of and types of suites to
be provided in the proposed development.
R/2017-465
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-052-DVP
respecting property located at 22260 & 22292 122 Avenue, 12159 &
12167 223 Street.
DEFEATED
Councillor Bell, Councillor Masse, Councillor Robson,
Councillor Shymkiw - OPPOSED
1111 2016-052-DP, 22260 and 22292 122 Avenue, 12159 and 12167 223
Street
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-052-DP to permit construction
of a 288 unit rental apartment building in the Town Centre.
R/2017-466
It was moved and seconded
That Item 1111 2016-052-DP, 22260 and 22292 122 Avenue, 12159
and 12167 223 Street dated October 10, 2017 be deferred.
CARRIED
Councillor Shymkiw - OPPOSED
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 15 of 22
1112 2017-368-DVP, 25608 Bosonworth Avenue
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-368-DVP to exempt the
construction of 256 Street south of the current cul-de-sac due to steep
terrain.
R/2017-467
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-368-DVP
respecting property located at 25608 Bosonworth Avenue.
CARRIED
1113 2017-369-DVP, 25638 112 Avenue
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-369-DVP to vary the
requirement for the construction of 256 Street due to excessive slope.
R/2017-468
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-369-DVP
respecting property located at 25638 112 Avenue.
CARRIED
1114 2017-274-DP, 25638 112 Avenue, Wildfire Protection Development Permit
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-274-DP to issue a Wildfire
Protection Development Permit to allow a subdivision of four RS-2 (One
Family Suburban Residential) lots and one remnant RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) lot.
R/2017-469
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-274-DP
respecting property located at 25638 112 Avenue.
CARRIED
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 16 of 22
1115 2017-275-DP, 25608 Bosonworth Avenue, Wildfire Protection
Development Permit
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-275-DP to issue a Wildfire
Protection Development Permit to allow for three RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential) lots.
R/2017-470
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-275-DP
respecting property located at 25608 Bosonworth Avenue.
CARRIED
1116 2017-169-SD, 13704 232 Street, 232A Street Local Area Service Bylaw
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that a Local Area
Service Bylaw be authorized and that 232A Street Local Area Service Bylaw
No. 7393-2017 to permit enhanced landscape maintenance of bioswales
along newly proposed 232A Street and some riparian planting along 232
Street and 132 Avenue be given first, second and third readings.
R/2017-471
It was moved and seconded
1. That a Local Area Service Bylaw, as formally petitioned by the
developer of the lands referred to as ‘232A Street’, and per the
Community Charter, Part 7, Division 5, 211 (1)(a), be authorized for
the enhanced landscape maintenance costs to be levied on the
benefitting properties; and further,
2. That 232A Local Area Service Bylaw No. 7393-2017 be given first,
second and third readings.
CARRIED
1117 2016-441-SD, 5% Money in Lieu of Parkland Dedication, 23055 117
Avenue
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that the owner of land
proposed for subdivision at 23055 117 Avenue, under application 2016-
441-SD, shall pay to the City of Maple Ridge an amount that is not less
than $115,000.00.
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 17 of 22
R/2017-472
It was moved and seconded
That pursuant to Local Government Act, Section 510, regarding 5%
Parkland Dedication or payment in lieu, be it resolved that the owner of
land proposed for subdivision at 23055 117 Avenue, under application
2016-441-SD, shall pay to the City of Maple Ridge an amount that is not
less than $115,000.00.
CARRIED
Financial and Corporate Services (including Fire and Police)
1131 Option for 9 (nine) Council Members
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 providing an option for the
establishment of an increase in the current size of Council to mayor and 8
councillors or for maintaining the status quo.
The Manager of Legislative Services explained that this opportunity was
one of the recommendations put forward by the Open Government Task
Force and subsequently Council passed a resolution on July 25, 2016
requiring staff to bring back a report on the financial implications of adding
two more Council members.
R/2017-473
It was moved and seconded
That staff retain status quo and revisit prior to the 2022 general local
election.
CARRIED
Mayor Read, Councillor Duncan, Councillor Speirs - OPPOSED
1132 Award of Audit Services Contract
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that the contract for
audit services be awarded to BDO Canada LLP and that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 18 of 22
R/2017-474
It was moved and seconded
That on the recommendation of the Audit & Finance Committee, the
contract for audit services be awarded to BDO Canada LLP and that the
Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the contract.
CARRIED
Councillor Bell, Councillor Robson - OPPOSED
1133 Proposed Cellular Communications Tower at 27002 River Road
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that satisfactory
completion of the public consultation process by Freedom Mobile be
acknowledged.
Erica Rigik, Manager, Real Estate and Municipal Affairs Western Region
Ms. Rigik addressed questions on the ability to camouflage the proposed
communication tower and on co-location opportunities for the tower.
R/2017-475
It was moved and seconded
That satisfactory completion of the Public Consultation process by Freedom
Mobile is acknowledged with seven comments received, four expressing
concerns related to health and safety.
CARRIED
Councillor Masse, Councillor Speirs - OPPOSED
Parks, Recreation & Culture – Nil
Administration
1171 Partnering Agreement – Employment Land Investment Incentive Program
Staff report dated October 10, 2017 recommending that the Corporate
Officer be authorized to execute Partnering Agreements with Tomax
Enterprises Ltd. under building permit numbers 17-108760 and 17-
108753.
R/2017-476
It was moved and seconded
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute Partnering Agreements
with:
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 19 of 22
1. Tomax Enterprises Ltd. under building permit number 17-108760 in
the amount of $4,231.85; and
2. Tomax Enterprises Ltd. under building permit number 17-108753 in
the amount of $4,231.85.
CARRIED
Councillor Robson - OPPOSED
Other Committee Issues – Nil
1200 STAFF REPORTS – Nil
1300 OTHER MATTERS DEEMED EXPEDIENT – Nil
1400 NOTICES OF MOTION AND MATTERS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS – Nil
1500 QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Ahmed Yousef
Mr. Yousef asked whether Council was aware that North Fraser Auto and
several other businesses are being thwarted in a request to appear before
Council. He provided background on a request he made to appear before
Council as a delegation to speak to issues being dealt with by local
businesses resulting from the camp at St. Anne’s Park. He highlighted
conversations held with Mayor Read and City staff.
Mayor Read provided her perspective on a conversation held with Mr.
Yousef. She advised that she had suggested that all parties impacted meet
on the issues outside of a Council meeting.
The Manager of Legislative Services provided clarification on discussions
held with Mr. Yousef.
Mayor Read offered to have a meeting arranged which will involve all
parties, including MLA’s and the local MP.
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 20 of 22
Mark Lancaster – Owner of North Fraser Automotive
Mr. Lancaster advised on issues occurring at his business due to the St.
Anne‘s Park homeless camp. He stated that the City owns the land yet
allows the camp to remain and asked why the lawsuit was dropped. He
expressed concern over the impact of the camp on his business and others
in the area. He advised that he had met with the Executive Director of the
BIA and asked whether the Mayor had met with her as he has not heard
back.
Mayor Read advised on conversations held with the BIA, City staff and the
Chief of Police and addressed questions on the issue of the injunction.
Scott O’Dell – Owner of Home Hardware
Mr. O’Dell advised that he owns one of the numerous businesses being
seriously impacted by residents of the homeless camp. His biggest
concern is with the increase in the threat level from residents of the camp
coming into his store. He had concerns about the support provided by the
RCMP particularly in response to complaints of violence and assault. He
described incidences of violence which have taken place at his store and
expressed concern for his staff and his customers.
Mayor Read advised that Mr. O’Dell’s concerns with the RCMP will be
followed up on. She reiterated the need to have a round table meeting with
all to express concerns and have issues dealt with.
Kim Engele
Ms. Engele asked why the City feels that the Provincial Government is
responsible for theft, intimidation, threats and break-ins in houses and
businesses throughout Maple Ridge.
Mayor Read spoke to the Provincial mandate to solve local homelessness
and encouraged Ms. Engele to send an e-mail to the RCMP with her
concerns on theft.
Note: Councillor Bell left the meeting at 9:53 p.m.
Ahmed Yousef
Mr. Yousef asked which section of the Community Charter stated that
delegations must be subjected to vetting by City staff, which bylaw gives
staff the right to censor those who wish to appear before their elected
officials and under whose authority is this being done? He also asked
whether Council will intervene to ensure citizens’ voices are heard?
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 21 of 22
The Manager of Legislative Services advised on the Community Charter
section pertaining to the establishment of a procedures bylaw by Council
which includes a process for adding delegations to Council meetings. She
also advised on her responses to Mr. Yousef’s request to appear as a
delegation.
Dennis Wager
Mr. Wager outlined the impact on his home and neighbourhood resulting
from the St. Anne homeless camp. He asked what Council and the City can
do to help the neighbourhood. He asked whether a security guard can be
posted on the corner and whether a street sweeper can be sent to clean
up.
Mayor Read outlined the various services currently being provided to the
camp by BC Housing.
Mr. Wager reiterated his request for more security to be provided for the
neighbourhood
Mayor Read advised that this will be followed up on with the Provincial
Government.
R/2017-478
It was moved and seconded
That Question Period be extended for another 15 minutes.
CARRIED
Riekie Armstrong
Ms. Armstrong asked why the camp on St. Anne is still there in that it is a
protest camp. She asked why Maple Ridge is considering housing
professional protesters from Vancouver brought in by Ivan Drury.
Mayor Read addressed the issue of the protest camp and Mr. Drury’s role.
She spoke to the legal issues surrounding the dissolution of the camp.
Chris Fairfax – Owner of Wolf Bar
Mr. Fairfax expressed that he would like to open a recreational marihuana
bar in Maple Ridge. He asked when Council will begin discussions on the
legalization of marihuana and when he may be able to get a license.
Mayor Read advised on discussions being held on a local, provincial and
federal level. The Federal Government will be responsible for regulating
production and the Provincial Government will be regulating distribution.
She also advised that currently such businesses are not considered legal.
Council Meeting Minutes
October 10, 2017
Page 22 of 22
Sheena Holt
Mrs. Holt asked how long a house that has been vacant and boarded can
up be left. She advised that a house next to hers has been vacant for four
years and expressed concern with the types of persons accessing the
house. She stated that she has called the Bylaws Department.
Mayor Read asked that Mrs. Holt provide the Manager of Legislative
Services with information on this property. She expressed Council’s desire
to take serious measures in dealing with derelict properties.
1600 ADJOURNMENT – 10:09 p.m.
_______________________________
N. Read, Mayor
Certified Correct
___________________________________
L. Darcus, Corporate Officer
City of Maple Ridge
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
October 17, 2017
The Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held on October 17, 2017 at 4:33
p.m. in the Blaney Room of the City Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British
Columbia for the purpose of transacting regular City business.
0BPRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Mayor N. Read P. Gill, Chief Administrative Officer
Councillor C. Bell K. Swift, General Manager of Parks, Recreation & Culture
Councillor Duncan F. Quinn, General Manager of Public Works and
Councillor B. Masse Development Services
Councillor Speirs L. Darcus, Manager of Legislative Services
Councillor Shymkiw
ABSENT
Councillor G. Robson
Note: These Minutes are also posted on the City’s Web Site at www.mapleridge.ca
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
2.0 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
R/2017-479
It was moved and seconded
That the agenda for the October 17, 2017 Special Council Meeting be
approved.
CARRIED
3.0 NOTICE OF CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING
R/2017-480
It was moved and seconded
That the meeting following this meeting at 6:00 p.m. be closed to the public
pursuant to Sections 90 (1) and 90 (2) of the Community Charter as the
subject matter being considered relates to the following:
Special Council Meeting Minutes
October 17, 2017
Page 2 of 2
Section 90(1)(f) Law enforcement, if the council considers that
disclosure might reasonably be expected to harm the
conduct of an investigation under or enforcement of
an enactment.
Section 90(1)(g) Litigation or potential litigation affecting the
municipality.
Section 90(1)(i) The receipt of advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that
purpose.
Section 90(2)(b) The consideration of information received and held in
confidence relating to negotiations between the
municipality and a provincial government.
Any other matter that may be brought before the Council that meets the
requirements for a meeting closed to the public pursuant to Sections 90 (1)
and 90 (2) of the Community Charter or Freedom of Information and
Protection of Privacy Act.
CARRIED
4.0 ADJOURNMENT – 4:34 p.m.
_______________________________
N. Read, Mayor
Certified Correct
___________________________________
L. Darcus, Corporate Officer
402 Minutes of the Public Hearing
402
City of Maple Ridge
PUBLIC HEARING
October 17, 2017
The Minutes of the Public Hearing held in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 11995 Haney
Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia on October 17, 2017 at 7:06 p.m.
____________________________________________________________________________
PRESENT
Elected Officials Appointed Staff
Mayor N. Read P. Gill, Chief Administrative Officer
Councillor C. Bell L. Darcus, Manager of Legislative Services
Councillor K. Duncan F. Quinn, General Manager of Public Works and
Councillor B. Masse Development
Councillor G. Robson K. Swift, General Manager of Parks, Recreation & Culture
Councillor T. Shymkiw C. Carter, Director of Planning
Councillor C. Speirs A. Gaunt, Confidential Secretary
Other staff as required
W. Cooper, Senior Planning Technician
D. Hall, Planner 2
______________________________________________________________________________
Mayor Read called the meeting to order. The Manager of Legislative Services explained the
procedure and rules of order of the Public Hearing and advised that the bylaws will be
considered further at the next Council Meeting on October 24, 2017.
The Mayor then called upon Planning Department staff to present the following items on the
agenda:
1) 2015-327-RZ, 21710 and 21728 Lougheed Highway
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7196-2015
To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to C-2 (Community Commercial),
the current application is to permit the future construction of a Gold’s Gym
The Manager of Legislative Services advised that no correspondence was received on this
item.
W. Cooper, Senior Planning Technician gave a power point presentation providing the
following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Official Community Plan Context
• Neighbourhood Context
Public Hearing Minutes
October 17, 2017
Page 2 of 4
• Site Characteristics
• Development Proposal
• Site Plan
• Landscape Plan
• Terms and Conditions
The Mayor called for speakers three times.
There being no comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
2) 2016-109-RZ, 21137 River Road
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7249-2016
To rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RT-1 (Two Family Urban
Residential), the current application is to permit the development of a duplex.
The Manager of Legislative Services advised that no correspondence was received on this
item.
D. Hall, Planner gave a power point presentation providing the following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Neighbourhood Plan Context
• Official Community Plan Context
• Site Characteristics
• Development Proposal
• Site Plan
• Terms and Conditions
Note: Councillor Speirs left the meeting at 7:18 p.m.
The Mayor called for speakers three times.
There being no comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
3) 2016-066-RZ, 24240 125 Avenue
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7239-2016
To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential), the current application is to permit a future subdivision of 2 lots
The Manager of Legislative Services advised that no correspondence was received on this
item.
Public Hearing Minutes
October 17, 2017
Page 3 of 4
W. Cooper, Senior Planning Technician gave a power point presentation providing the
following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Neighbourhood Plan Context
• Official Community Plan Context
• Site Characteristics
• Development Proposal
• Site Plan
• Terms and Conditions
Note: Councillor Speirs returned at 7:23 p.m.
The Mayor called for speakers three times.
There being no comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
4) 2016-244-RZ, 11184, 11154 and 11080 240 Street
Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7381-2017
To amend Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan, Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan
from Neighbourhood Commercial, Medium Density Residential and Conservation to
Village Commercial, Medium Density Residential and Conservation; and
To amend Schedule “C” of the Official Community Plan to remove from Conservation
and to add to Conservation
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7276-2016
To rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
and C-5 (Village Centre Commercial), the current application is to permit the future
construction of a 130 unit townhouse development and a 905 square metre
commercial building with residential uses on the second story
The Manager of Legislative Services advised that correspondence in support of the
application was received from Mohammad Beikahmadi, Marco Sebastiani, Josephine & D.
Lombardi, Brock Backus, and Mohamed Shariff as well as two other property owners whose
signatures were not legible.
D. Hall, Planner gave a power point presentation providing the following information:
• Application Information
• Subject Map
• Neighbourhood Plan Context
• Official Community Plan Context
• Site Characteristics
• Development Proposal
Public Hearing Minutes
October 17, 2017
Page 4 of 4
• Site Plan
• Elevations
• Landscape Plan
• Terms and Conditions
The Mayor called for speakers three times.
Brock Backus
Mr. Backus spoke in support of the development.
There being no comment, the Mayor declared this item dealt with.
Having given all those persons whose interests were deemed affected by the matters
contained herein a chance to be heard, the Mayor adjourned the Public Hearing at 7:34 p.m.
____________________________
N. Read, Mayor
Certified Correct
______________________________
L. Darcus, Corporate Officer
700 ITEMS ON CONSENT
700
701 Minutes
701
701.1 Development Agreements Committee
701.1
701.2 Minutes of Meetings of Committees and Commissions of Council
701.2
702 Reports
702
1 of 1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: 2017 Council Expenses
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In keeping with Council’s commitment to transparency in local government, the attached Schedule
lists Council expenses recorded to date. The expenses included on the schedule are those required
to be reported in the annual Statement of Financial Information and are available on our website.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive for information
Discussion
The expenses included in the attached schedule are those reported in the annual Statement of
Financial Information (SOFI), including those incurred under Policy 3.07 “Council Training,
Conferences and Association Building”. The budget for Council includes the provision noted in Policy
3.07 as well as a separate budget for cell phone and iPad usage. The amounts on the attached
Schedule are those recorded prior to the preparation of this report and are subject to change.
“original signed by Paula Melvin”
______________________________________________________________
Prepared by: Paula Melvin
Executive Assistant, Corporate Administration
“original signed by Catherine Nolan”
_______________________________________________________________
Approved by: Catherine Nolan, CPA, CGA
Interim Director of Finance
“original signed by Paul Gill”
__________________________________________________________________
Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
702.1
Month of Event Reason for expense Conferences & Seminars Community Events Mileage / Parking Cell Phones / iPads Totals
Bell, Corisa
January Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
February Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
March Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
April Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
May Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
June Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
July Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)8.56
August Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
Union of BC Municipalities Conference 810.00
September
October
November
December
810.00 - - 64.20 874.20
Duncan, Kiersten
January Cell phone charges 42.80
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
February Cell phone charges 42.80
South Asian Cultural Society Gala 110.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
March Cell phone charges 43.10
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
High Ground Conference 528.48
April Cell phone charges 114.67
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)8.56
May Lower Mainland Local Government Association (LMLGA) Conference 931.30
Cell phone charges 42.96
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)34.24
June Cell phone charges 43.10
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
July Cell phone charges 42.80
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
August Cell phone charges 43.10
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
Union of BC Municipalities Conference 475.00
September Cell phone charges 42.80
October Making Cities Liveable Conference 1,973.72
November Zero Waste Conference 200.00
December
4,108.50 110.00 - 539.45 4,757.95
Month of Event Reason for expense Conferences & Seminars Community Events Mileage / Parking Cell Phones / iPads Totals
Masse, Bob
January
February
March Ridge Meadows Chamber Business Excellence Awards 125.00
April
May Maple Ridge Community Foundation Citizen of the Year Award 125.00
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
- 250.00 - - 250.00
Read, Nicole
January Cell phone charges 42.80
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
February Cell phone charges 42.80
South Asian Cultural Society Gala 110.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
March Cell phone charges 44.97
Ridge Meadows Chamber Business Excellence Awards 125.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
April Cell phone charges 48.83
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)8.56
May Cell phone charges 43.85
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
June Cell phone charges 52.31
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)34.24
Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) Conference 3,762.32
July Cell phone charges 54.93
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
Provincial Swearing-in Ceremony 698.63
August Cell phone charges 58.15
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)34.24
September Cell phone charges 44.62
October National Conference on Ending Homelessness 1,149.25
November
December
5,610.20 235.00 - 595.90 6,441.10
Month of Event Reason for expense Conferences & Seminars Community Events Mileage / Parking Cell Phones / iPads Totals
Robson, Gordy
January Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
February South Asian Cultural Society Gala 110.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
March Ridge Meadows Chamber Business Excellence Awards 125.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
April Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
May Lower Mainland Local Government Association (LMLGA) Conference 908.70
Maple Ridge Community Foundation Citizen of the Year Award 125.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
June Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
July Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
August Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
September
October
November
December
908.70 360.00 - 34.24 1,302.94
Shymkiw, Tyler
January Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
February South Asian Cultural Society Gala 110.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)17.12
March Attendance at meetings - parking 9.52
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
April Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
May Maple Ridge Community Foundation Citizen of the Year Award 125.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)34.24
June Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)111.28
July Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)34.24
August Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)34.24
September
October
November
December
- 235.00 9.52 243.96 488.48
Month of Event Reason for expense Conferences & Seminars Community Events Mileage / Parking Cell Phones / iPads Totals
Speirs, Craig
January Cell phone charges 42.96
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)8.56
February Cell phone charges 48.29
South Asian Cultural Society Gala 110.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)8.56
March Cell phone charges 42.80
Ridge Meadows Chamber Business Excellence Awards 125.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
High Ground Conference 240.31
April Cell phone charges 41.87
Haney Farmers Market Fundraiser 35.00
Ridge Meadows Multi Cultural Society Inaugural Gala 50.00
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)34.24
May Maple Ridge Community Foundation Citizen of the Year Award 125.00
Cell phone charges 42.80
Lower Mainland Local Government Association (LMLGA) Conference 967.33
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)51.36
June Cell phone charges 51.41
Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) Conference 3,572.87
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)34.24
July Cell phone charges 45.95
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
August Cell phone charges 42.80
Portable electronic device charges (e.g. Ipad)4.28
Union of BC Municipalities Conference 1,018.91
September Cell phone charges 43.40
October
November
December
5,799.42 445.00 - 552.08 6,796.50
TOTALS 17,236.82 1,635.00 9.52 2,029.83 20,911.17
CityCityCityCity of Maple Ridgeof Maple Ridgeof Maple Ridgeof Maple Ridge
TO:TO:TO:TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING MEETING MEETING MEETING DATEDATEDATEDATE:::: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council
FROM:FROM:FROM:FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: MEETING: MEETING: MEETING: Council
SUBJECTSUBJECTSUBJECTSUBJECT: Disbursements for the month ended September 30, 2017
EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:SUMMARY:SUMMARY:SUMMARY:
The disbursements summary for the past period is attached for information. All voucher payments are
approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor and a Finance Manager. Council authorizes the
disbursements listing through Council resolution. Expenditure details are available by request through
the Finance Department.
RECOMMENDATION:RECOMMENDATION:RECOMMENDATION:RECOMMENDATION:
That the That the That the That the disbursements as listed below for the month ended disbursements as listed below for the month ended disbursements as listed below for the month ended disbursements as listed below for the month ended September 30September 30September 30September 30, 2017, 2017, 2017, 2017 bebebebe received for received for received for received for
information only.information only.information only.information only.
GENERALGENERALGENERALGENERAL $$$$ 14,463,14,463,14,463,14,463,263263263263
PAPAPAPAYROLLYROLLYROLLYROLL $$$$ 2,860,6992,860,6992,860,6992,860,699
PURCHASE CARDPURCHASE CARDPURCHASE CARDPURCHASE CARD $$$$ 75,28875,28875,28875,288
$$$$ 17,399,25017,399,25017,399,25017,399,250
DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:DISCUSSION:
a)a)a)a) Background Context:Background Context:Background Context:Background Context:
The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and
provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services.
The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan.
b)b)b)b) Community Communications:Community Communications:Community Communications:Community Communications:
The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial
disbursements.
702.2
c)c)c)c) Business Plan / FBusiness Plan / FBusiness Plan / FBusiness Plan / Financial Implications:inancial Implications:inancial Implications:inancial Implications:
Highlights of larger items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution
• B & B Contracting Ltd – 128 Ave road & drainage improvements $ 829,531
•BA Blacktop – 2017 paving program $ 1,034,121
•Eurovia British Columbia – 203 St road & drainage improvements $ 896,335
•Fraser Valley Regional Library – 3rd quarter member assessment $ 679,690
•G.V. Water District – water consumption May 31 – Jun 27/17 $ 734,749
•RCMP Receiver General – RCMP contract Apr 1 – Jun 30/17 $ 4,507,185
•Ridge Meadows Recycling Society – monthly contract for recycling $ 203,709
•Triahn Enterprises Ltd – 117 Ave multi-user path $ 236,081
d)d)d)d) Policy Implications:Policy Implications:Policy Implications:Policy Implications:
Corporate governance practice includes reporting the disbursements to Council monthly.
CONCLUSIONS:CONCLUSIONS:CONCLUSIONS:CONCLUSIONS:
The disbursements for the month ended September 30, 2017 have been reviewed and are in order.
Original signed by G’Ann Rygg
______________________________________________
Prepared by: G’Ann RyggG’Ann RyggG’Ann RyggG’Ann Rygg
Accounting Clerk IIAccounting Clerk IIAccounting Clerk IIAccounting Clerk II
Original signed by Trevor Thompson
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Trevor Trevor Trevor Trevor Thompson, Thompson, Thompson, Thompson, BBA, BBA, BBA, BBA, CPA, CPA, CPA, CPA, CGACGACGACGA
Manager of Financial PlanningManager of Financial PlanningManager of Financial PlanningManager of Financial Planning
Original signed by Paul Gill
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, Paul Gill, BBA, Paul Gill, BBA, Paul Gill, BBA, CPA, CPA, CPA, CPA, CGACGACGACGA
Chief Administrative OfficerChief Administrative OfficerChief Administrative OfficerChief Administrative Officer
VENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNT
Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd Local Area Service 20300 Block Hampton Street 20,881
Associated Engineering(BC) Ltd 225 Street forcemain upgrade 14,844
240 Street sewer upgrades (109 Ave to South of Bridge)6,611 21,455
B & B Contracting Ltd 128 Avenue road & drainage improvements (216 St to 224 St)829,531
BA Blacktop 2017 paving program 1,034,121
BC Hydro Electricity 145,768
BC SPCA Contract payment - Aug & Sep 58,381
Boileau Electric & Pole Ltd Maintenance: Albion Sports Complex 217
All weather field 341
Banners 3,604
Boulevards 126
Council Chambers 673
Fairgrounds 531
Hammond Community Centre 107
Haney House 68
Haney Wharf 3,104
Leisure Centre 3,631
Memorial Park 500
Pedestrian crosswalk sign 157
Pump station 1,046
Street light pole replacement 1,986
Street lights 4,821
Telosky Stadium 555
Thomas Haney tennis courts 2,044
Traffic camera 321
Traffic signals 157
Wasp nest removal 143
Whonnock Lake 515 24,645
Braun Geotechnical Ltd Fraser River escarpment gap analysis 20,885
Cemetery expansion 5,250 26,135
CUPE Local 622 Dues - pay periods 17/18 & 17/19 27,226
Cedar Crest Lands (BC) Ltd Merkley artificial turf field 56,451
Chevron Canada R & M ULC Gasoline & diesel fuel 94,740
Cobing Building Solutions Electrical/Mechanical Maintenance:
Albion Fairgrounds 1,123
Caretaker house 258
City Hall 2,720
Firehalls 4,303
Greg Moore Youth Centre 470
Hammond Community Centre 2,185
Lawn Bowling Club 184
Leisure Centre 3,582
Library 1,085
Neighbourhood Park 462
Operations 2,957
Randy Herman Building 4,565
RCMP 10,549
Thornhill Hall 854
Whonnock Lake Community Centre 728
Whonnock Lake well system 2,161 38,186
Eurovia British Columbia 203 St road & drainage improvements (Lougheed Hwy to Golden Ears Way)896,335
Farm Tek Turf Services Inc Topdressing sports fields 62,945
FDM Software Ltd Fire Dept. asset management & preventative maintenance software 24,868
Educational workshop 2,362 27,230
Fitness Edge Contracted service provider - fitness classes & programs 21,417
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGECITY OF MAPLE RIDGECITY OF MAPLE RIDGECITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - SEPTEMBER 2017MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - SEPTEMBER 2017MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - SEPTEMBER 2017MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - SEPTEMBER 2017
VENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNT
Fraser Valley Regional Library 3rd quarter member assessment 679,690
Frazer Excavation Ltd Roadworks material hauling 25,995
Fred Surridge Ltd Waterworks supplies 35,715
Friends In Need Food Bank Community grant 15,000
Gotraffic Management Inc Traffic control 52,156
Greater Vanc Water District Water consumption May 31 - June 27/17 734,749
Guillevin International Inc Firefighter equipment 1,515
Firefighter protective wear 7,396
Firefighter turnout gear 42,096
Operations electrical supplies 2,164 53,171
Hanks Trucking And Bulldozing Roadworks hauling & bulldozing 18,220
Horizon Landscape Contractors Grass cutting - July 16,499
Humble Developments Ltd Security refund 128,957
Image Painting & Restoration Painting & restoration services:
Firehalls 1,575
Library 945
Streetlight poles 63,105 65,625
Industra Construction Corp McNutt Road reservoir expansion 134,933
Infinite Roadmarking Ltd Pavement marking program 38,047
Jacks Automotive & Welding Fire Dept equipment repairs 19,913
Lafarge Canada Inc Roadworks material 79,352
Manulife Financial Employer/employee remittance 147,145
Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council Arts Centre contract payment 54,167
Program revenue - Aug 20,471
Sponsorship for Maple Ridge Festival of BC Film 5,250
Stage equipment rental for Canada Day celebration 3,633 83,521
Mar-Tech Underground Services Inspection of pipelines & storm sewers 29,917
McElhanney Consulting Services 203 St road & drainage improvements (DTR to Golden Ears Way)82,536
232 St sidewalk (132 Ave to Silver Valley Road)35,739 118,276
Medical Services Plan Employee medical & health premiums 42,000
MP Pacific Developments Security refund 157,026
Municipal Pension Plan BC Employer/employee remittance 714,153
Ocean Pipe T6045 Culvert replacement program 15,446
Operations inventory 1,350 16,796
Olson, Kevin Security refund 77,169
Opus International Consultants Albion reservoir expansion 65,932
Inflow & infiltration reduction program 7,193
North slope interceptor capacity upgrade 8,639 81,763
PW Trenchless Construction Inc Sanitary sewer replacement on River Road (Kanaka Creek - McKay Ave)69,301
R F Binnie & Associates Ltd 207 St south of Lougheed Hwy (DTR to 118 Ave) - engineering design 50,814
Merkley Park synthetic sports field design 68,411 119,225
RCMP -Receiver General For Cda RCMP contract Apr 1 - Jun 30/17 4,507,185
Fingerprint searches 1,700 4,508,885
Receiver General For Canada Employer/Employee remittance PP17/18 & PP17/19 673,444
RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ice rental - Aug 56,895
Curling rink operating expenses - Jul & Aug 6,337 63,232
RGH Pacific Emergency Services Emergency traffic pre-emption systems 22,949
Ridge Canoe & Kayak Club Contracted service provider - canoe & kayak programs 17,237
Ridge Meadows Recycling Society Monthly contract for recycling 203,709
Weekly recycling 292
Roadside waste disposal 53
Toilet rebate program 296 204,350
Rogers Cellular devices Aug & Sep 21,985
Rollins Machinery Ltd Bear proof garbage bins 15,835
Safe Guard Fence Ltd Cottonwood Landfill gate & fencing 26,854
Sanscorp Products Ltd Roadworks material 29,826
Scottish Line Painting Ltd Thermoplastic road markings 29,246
SFE Ltd Inflow & infiltration reduction program - Albion Fairgrounds & Town Centre 10,408
Water system improvements - Fern Crescent 12,600 23,008
VENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAMEVENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENTDESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNTAMOUNT
Shape Architecture Inc.Leisure Centre pool systems redesign 12,861
Leisure Centre pool change room & lobby renovation design 110,219 123,080
Simson Maxwell Standby generator for 207 St sewage pumping station 36,960
Stantec Consulting Ltd 263 St water pump station replacement 11,328
Maple Ridge Main West - 224 Street PRV 27,822 39,150
Stewart McDannold Stuart Professional fees 16,769
Surlang Roofing Haney House roof replacement 46,725
The House That Jack Built Security refund 186,152
Triahn Enterprises Ltd 117 Ave multi-user path (Burnett St to 231 St)236,081
Urban Systems South Alouette & Kanaka integrated stormwater management plan 21,776
Warrington PCI Management Advance for Tower common costs plus expenses 85,992
Westview Sales Ltd Meter boxes & storm sewer/sanitary covers 17,637
Disbursements In Excess $15,000 13,586,93313,586,93313,586,93313,586,933
Disbursements Under $15,000 876,330876,330876,330876,330
Total Payee Disbursements 14,463,26314,463,26314,463,26314,463,263
Payroll PP17/18, PP17/19 & PP17/20 2,860,6992,860,6992,860,6992,860,699
Purchase Cards - Payment 75,28875,28875,28875,288
Total Disbursements September 2017 17,399,25017,399,25017,399,25017,399,250
Page 1 of 2
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: Oct. 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: T21-212-003
FROM: Interim Director of Finance MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Adjustments to 2016 & 2017 Collector’s Roll
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
BC Assessment (BCA) has revised the assessed value for the 2017 Collector’s Roll through the
issuance of Supplementary Rolls 3 through 6. They have also provided us with revised assessment
information for one property for 2016. The Collector is required to make all the necessary changes to
the municipal tax roll records and reports these adjustments to Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
For information only
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Four folios were adjusted in total:
Appeals filed with the Property Assessment Appeal Board as well as reviews undertaken by BCA
resulted in adjustments to the assessed value of four residential properties to more accurately
reflect their values.
(Municipal tax revenue changes: Increase in Class 1 (Residential) $8,151)
b)Business Plan/Financial Implications:
There is a total increase of $ 8,151 in municipal tax revenue, $6,564 of which is attributable to
2016.
702.3
Page 2 of 2
CONCLUSIONS:
Adjustments by BCA resulted in an increase of $475,000 to the Residential assessment base for
2017 and $1,500,000 for 2016.
This report dated Nov. 07, 2017 is submitted for information and is available to the public.
“Original signed by Silvia Rutledge”
______________________________________________
Prepared by: Silvia Rutledge
Manager of Revenue & Collections
“Original signed by Catherine Nolan”
_____________________________________________
Approved by: Catherine Nolan, CPA, CGA
Interim Director of Finance
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_____________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, BBA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
Page 1 of 3
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Pitt Meadows Airport – Strategic Framework
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The interim Board of Directors of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society has been established by the
members. In early July, the interim board worked with a facilitator to develop the attached strategic
framework for the airport. The interim Board unanimously endorsed this framework at a subsequent
board meeting and this framework is submitted to Council for information.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
RECEIVE FOR INFORMATION
DISCUSSION:
The interim Board of Directors of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society is comprised of the following
Council members:
Pitt Meadows: Mayor Becker, Councillors Bell and Stark
Maple Ridge: Councillors Masse, Robson and Speirs
This interim Board seems to be working well. It is meeting regularly and making progress on a
number of issues. This past July, the interim board met and unanimously endorsed the strategic
framework that is submitted to Council for information.
This framework is consistent with the Constitution and Bylaws of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society.
“Original signed by Lino Siracusa”
Prepared by: Lino Siracusa
Manager of Economic Development
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
Approved by: Paul Gill
Chief Administrative Officer
702.4
Page 2 of 3
DRAFT
YPK STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK
July 25, 2017
MISSION
Develop YPK Airport for the benefit of Pitt Meadows, Maple Ridge and surrounding region.
VISION
To be a significant contributor to the North Fraser region’s economic diversity through quality air
services and vibrant business activity at and near the airport.
KEY GOALS
1.0 Air Services
1.1 To determine viable commercial services using competitive advantage analysis that are
compatible with member municipalities’ land use plans and economic development strategies.
1.2 To consider potentially viable opportunities based on business orientated rationale in a manner
that is respectful of those living close to the Airport and most likely to be impacted by airport
operations.
1.3 To pursue long-term capital planning of infrastructure for potentially viable commercial services
1.4 To accommodate general aviation-use that is compatible with the strategic growth of the airport.
2.0 Airport Operations
2.1 To secure adequate capital funding to sustain the airport infrastructure sustainability.
2.2 To provide an efficient airport facility and services that are safe, maintain all regulatory
requirements and are customer-service orientated
2.3 To maximize community awareness of airport plans and its contribution to regional sustainability
3.0 Airport Lands Development
3.1 To develop long term land use plan that is aligned with the land use policies of Metro Vancouver,
City of Maple Ridge, District of Pitt Meadows and other relevant agencies.
3.2 To maximize the monetization of assets by ensuring fair and competitive user rates for services.
3.3 To target market the YPK advantage for airside and responsible business opportunities.
4.0 Airport Management
4.1 To sustain a governance and management structure with clearly defined responsibilities for day-
to-day operations, future development and member accountability.
4.2 To ensure long term financial sustainability and fiscal accountability
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
a.To make evidence based decisions using business analysis.
b.To keep the public and users aware of key activities and growth plans.
c.To achieve a high level of collaboration among staff, Directors and member municipalities.
d.To establish a realistic competitive advantage to guide sustainability efforts
e.To ensure safety and exceptional customer service guide our service delivery
f.To coordinate efforts with local municipalities, First Nations and agencies to benefit the
region
g.To work openly and supportively work] with nearby residents and airport users.
h.To align airport sustainability efforts with relevant jurisdictional agency aims
i.To be an Employer of Choice treating all employees with fairness, dignity and respect.
Page 3 of 3
YPK STRATEGIC DIRECTION
July 2017
KEY GOALS – Elements Strategies
AIR SERVICES:
General Aviation
Passenger Services
Cargo Services
Interim General ‘Air Service’ prospectus (2017)
Competitive Advantage Analysis (2018)
AIRPORT OPERATIONS:
Aviation Fuel
Transit Facility [please define]
Parking Areas
Regulatory Compliance
Safety Measures
Helicopter Infrastructure Business Case (2017)
AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT:
Infrastructure Services
Lot supply
Marketing Efforts
Air side Focus
Non-airside focus
Land Use Planning
Land Use Plan (2017)
Airport Master Plan Update (2018)
Long Term Capital Plan (2018)
Interim General ‘Business Development’ prospectus (2017)
Competitive Advantage Analysis (2018)
Target Business Marketing Plan (2018)
AIRPORT MANAGEMENT:
Human Resources
Strategic Planning
Decision Making
Fiscal Accountability
Governance System
Public Communication
Agency Relations
Determine parameters for business case development
(2017)
Achieve Board complement of directors (2017)
Review general aviation user fees (2017)
Develop long term financial plan (2018)
Development annual business plan (2017)
Member municipality briefing schedule (2017)
Operational Policy Review
Operational Manual [let’s discuss, as it exists]
1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Ridge Meadows Minor Lacrosse Outdoor Box Follow Up Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Ridge Meadows Minor Lacrosse Association (RMMLA) made a presentation to Council on March
14, 2017 highlighting their association’s growth in participation and resulting challenges, and
requested a number of items to better support the sport within our community. At the July 4, 2017
Council Workshop, staff presented a list of immediate needs of the RMMLA and outlining items
which can be dealt with on an immediate basis including increased access to synthetic turf fields,
field markings to support girls’ lacrosse, lighting for the existing lacrosse boxes and a request for a
new lit lacrosse box with a roof. Council subsequently directed staff “to provide potential locations
for a new lacrosse box with lighting”.
RECOMMENDATION:
No resolution required.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
In further discussion with RMMLA representatives, in addition to providing lights and a roof to
cover to an existing lacrosse box, the group’s highest priority is a new covered box with lights,
sport court flooring, and washrooms/change rooms which they suggest could be used
throughout the year and may benefit for indoor sports.
Staff recommend that a lit, covered lacrosse box should be within a community level park or
high school site, where other sports activities are typically held, providing sufficient area for
the lacrosse box, buffering, supportive parking, and minimizing traffic on neighbourhood
roads. Placing a box at a high school site provides additional benefits as the school may use
the box while box users may use the school parking.
Staff explored potential sites across the City’s park and school properties which could
accommodate this size of facility and provide for parking. Maple Ridge and Thomas Haney
Secondary school grounds, which have existing lacrosse boxes, along with Garibaldi, Samuel
Robertson and Westview Secondary schools grounds cannot accommodate a covered box as
there is insufficient available land or are at capacity to support additional facility parking.
Community sports parks, such as Hammond Stadium or Albion Sports Complex, are also at
capacity with considerable parking pressures.
702.5
2
Belle Morse Park/Albion Fairgrounds Site
Staff suggest Belle Morse neighbourhood park, immediately adjacent the Albion Fairgrounds,
as a potential location. While placing a facility like this in a neighborhood park is not
considered ideal due to the smaller sizes which limits the ability to provide sufficient land
base for the box, parking and buffering and is likely to result in complaints from nearby
residents due to noise, traffic and facility operations, however this park is quite large and
access could be provided through the Planet Ice entry off 105 Avenue with a vehicular bridge
over the watercourse located to the east side of the ice facility. The east end of this park is
not well utilized and there is adequate space to provide for the box, parking and a buffer for
the neighbouring residents as shown on the attached concept.
Costing
In the July 4, 2017 Council Workshop report, high level costing for a lit outdoor lacrosse box
was suggested in the $800,000 - $1,000,000 range which did not include costs for a roof
structure or supportive parking. A lit, covered lacrosse box would cost approximately
$1,200,000 without washrooms/change rooms and an additional $500,000 would be
required to provide parking and access to support this use at Belle Morse Park. Costing
breakdown for the Belle Morse Park/Albion Fairgrounds location is as follows:
Cost Breakdown:
Lacrosse box with lighting $800,000
Box Cover (open sides) $400,000
Parking $200,000
Vehicular bridge $300,000
TOTAL $1,700,000
Development Timeline
Staff suggest that the development timeframe including community and stakeholder
consultation would be approximately eight to twelve months and the process timeline is as
follows:
Stage Timeframe
Geotechnical, environmental and site survey investigation 1-2 months
Concept Design - Community & Stakeholder consultation 1 month
Design RFP and detailed design 3-4 months
Permits, environmental approvals and tendering 2-3 months
Construction 1-2 months
b) Desired Outcome:
To provide Council with information on potential sites, costing and development timeframes
for a lit lacrosse box and could include a cover to address the sports club’s request.
c) Strategic Alignment:
The Parks, Recreation & Culture Master Plan (2010) contains the strategic objective to
continue to provide a variety of facilities in parks to support multiple uses, staying current
with trends.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
The Lacrosse Association advised Council that lacrosse has been a rapidly growing sport in
our community, including the establishment of girl’s teams, and additional access to facilities
would better support this club. RMMLA would benefit from the provision of lighting at one or
3
both of the existing boxes in the short term and the provision of a new lit, covered lacrosse
box which would provide increased box capacity throughout the year, especially from January
to March when adverse weather conditions impact use of the lacrosse boxes. The covered
box facility may be of benefit to other community sports groups.
e) Business Plan/Financial Implications:
Development Cost Charges are not an available funding source for a lacrosse box and this
cost is not included in our current financial plan. Should Council wish to proceed with this
request, a funding source would need to be identified. It should be noted that reserves have
limited capacity due to other Parks, Recreation & Culture initiatives currently under
consideration.
f) Alternatives:
Council may wish to direct staff to include this project in the Alternative Approval Process,
should they wish to move ahead with a covered box. If approved, staff recommend next
steps would include community consultation, geotechnical investigation and preliminary
design work to provide more detailed costing.
CONCLUSIONS:
Minor Lacrosse’s priority is for a lit, covered box with a sports court surface, which they feel would
also benefit other sports groups when not being used by Lacrosse. Belle Morse Park has a potential
area to accommodate the box facility, parking to support the use and buffering for neighbouring
residents. Locating this facility in close proximity to the Fairgrounds may be of benefit to other
lacrosse events already hosted here, providing both additional covered floor space and parking.
“Original signed by Valoree Richmond”
Prepared by: Valoree Richmond, Manager of Parks Planning & Operations
“Original signed by David Boag”
Reviewed by: David Boag, Director Parks & Facilities
“Original signed by Kelly Swift”
Approved by: Kelly Swift, General Manager: Parks, Recreation & Culture
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
:vr
Attachment: Belle Morse Park/Albion Fairgrounds Outdoor Box location concept
City of PittMeadows
District ofLangley District of Mission
FRASER
R
.
^37
911 171
3
1921 231933
11
21333333
3
1
3
3
7
33333
3
1733
3
3
3 93 91
9
4
6
8
2
161412
182222
28
141864
18
8
416126
4
515155
1020202010DATE: Sep 29, 2017
FILE: Untitled
Belle Morse
Lacrosse Box
The City of Maple Ridge makes no guarantee
regarding the accuracy or present status of
the information shown on this map.
PARKS & LEISURE SERVICES DEPT.´
Scale: 1:500
BY: CN
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016
Vehicle
Bridge
Sp
e
n
c
e
r
C
r
e
e
k
1
5
.
0m
Se
t
b
a
c
k
3
0
.
0m
Se
t
b
a
c
k
50 Parking
Stalls
Covered
Lacrosse
Box
Play
Area
Play
Area
Planet
Ice
V
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
B
u
f
f
e
r
900 Correspondence
900
From: Greta Borick-Cunningham [mailto:arms@alouetteriver.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 2:47 PM
To: Nicole Read
Subject: Letter of support request
Importance: High
Hello Mayor Read
I would like to request a letter of support from the City of Maple Ridge with regards to our funding
application to the Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program this year. I have attached the DRAFT plan
and proposal as it is still in editing stage. However, our deadline is next Friday 27 October, so I didn’t
want to leave my request too late.
This proposal represents Year 2 of an eleven-year plan to determine feasibility to establish a self-
sustaining sockeye run in the Alouette reservoir.
Changes to this proposal compared to last year are that we are not applying for funding for the
experimental hatchery as we are awaiting results from a peer-reviewed study from DFO. Other than
that, most of the project will continue as it did this year, if we are approved for funding.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions with regards to my request.
Thank you very much,
Greta Borick-Cunningham
Executive Director
Alouette River Management Society
24959 Alouette Road Maple Ridge, BC V4R 1R8
604 – 467 – 6401
www.alouetteriver.org
901
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility Plan (2017-2027) 1 | Page
DRAFT – COA-F19-F-2683
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility
(2017 – 2027 Overall Plan)
Background
In 1928 the South Alouette River and two lakes were impounded by the building of the Alouette Dam to
create the Alouette Reservoir. The dam cut off access for anadromous Pacific salmon, cutthroat trout
and bull trout to utilize upstream tributaries for spawning and the lakes for spawning and rearing; all
anadromous populations were extirpated as a result. While anadromous Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus
nerka) no longer migrated to the ocean, they remained in the reservoir as their resident form, Kokanee.
The Katzie people in the Alouette watershed historically relied on this Sockeye run as a main food source
and they continue to have a deep cultural tie to Alouette Sockeye. The size structure and density of the
Kokanee population in the reservoir has recently been greatly improved as a result of the Alouette
Nutrient Restoration Program, funded by a BC Hydro/MOE long-term agreement to support recreational
fishing in the Alouette Reservoir. The Nutrient Restoration Program is compensation for incremental
entrainment at Stave Reservoir and is in lieu of Stave Reservoir fertilization. Following experimental
spring-time surface spills in 2005, adult Sockeye were first observed returning to the base of Alouette
Dam in 2007, which were genetically shown to be from the Alouette Kokanee population (Godbout et al
2011). Since that time, annual spring-time dam spillway operations have facilitated the emigration of
“nerkid” (Kokanee-Sockeye) juveniles from the reservoir to the Alouette River to promote adult Sockeye
returns. Any returning adults are trapped and trucked to the reservoir by BC Corrections to encourage
Sockeye spawning and juvenile recruitment in the reservoir.
The Alouette River Sockeye Restoration Program (ARSRP) is a joint initiative between the Katzie First
Nation, Alouette River Management Society, BC Hydro, BC Ministry of Environment, Fisheries and
Oceans Canada, and local stakeholders. The objective of the ARSRP is to promote re-establishment of
anadromous Alouette Sockeye and determine feasibility of fish passage past the Alouette Dam through
adherence to the BC Hydro Fish Passage Decision Framework (the ‘Framework’). Re-establishment of
Sockeye is intended to meet the following requirements (1) that the Sockeye stock originate from the
Alouette Watershed (2) that the run size meet DFO requirements for a minimum viable population, and
(3) is self-sustaining (i.e. no long-term hatchery intervention).
To support these objectives, the ARSRP has undertaken and overseen several initiatives including a trap
and truck program, a spring flow release program to facilitate smolt passage, and several feasibility
studies. To date, feasibility work under the ARSRP has involved monitoring outmigrating smolts (LGL
2014), enumerating returning adult Sockeye (ARMS 2014), as well as investigating Sockeye movements
and mapping of potential spawning locations of adult Sockeye and Kokanee in the reservoir (LGL 2014).
An assessment of the reproductive success of the returning adult Sockeye suggested that few if any of
the transferred adults (2008-2012) reproduced successfully (Godbout et al. 2014). Knowledge gaps
were identified and an experimental release of hatchery–reared Sockeye was proposed to fill these gaps
(ARMS 2014), which led to the establishment of the Alouette River Sockeye Hatchery. A synthesis report
was developed in 2015 which also proposed the experimental release of hatchery-reared Sockeye (LGL
2015). In 2015, hatchery upgrades were funded through FWCP, and in 2016 funding was suspended
due to FWCP concerns with the potential long-term role of the hatchery in the Sockeye restoration plan.
Restoration Feasibility Plan Options
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility Plan (2017-2027) 2 | Page
DRAFT – COA-F19-F-2683
The BC Ministry of Environment (MOE) has developed a model that predicts the number of Sockeye
adults returning to the Alouette dam based on assumptions of heritability of outmigration behavior,
ocean survival and density dependent effects in the reservoir. This ‘nerkid model’ predicts that while
there is little likelihood that Sockeye restoration will impact the Kokanee fishery in the reservoir through
density dependent interactions, projections for Sockeye returns are low. The nerkid model
acknowledges significant uncertainty in marine survival and especially heritability, which translates into
uncertainty in restoration outcomes. Currently there are no studies that estimate the heritability of
smolting in Sockeye. This uncertainty will be common in any similar project, (e.g. Coquitlam) and will
potentially cloud future decisions around the ecological benefits of fish passage. Given the importance
of Sockeye restoration to the Katzie people, as well as other First Nations and society in general, we feel
that addressing all uncertainties to the best of our ability will help inform future decisions around fish
passage at Alouette and other watersheds around the province. This Research Plan focuses on resolving
much of this uncertainty through an adaptive management experiment on Sockeye and Kokanee in
Alouette Reservoir.
The ARSRP held a workshop to create a plan to assess the feasibility of Sockeye restoration to the
Alouette Reservoir, in consideration of the nerkid model predictions. Several options were discussed:
1. Nerkid Model Review: conducting a model review using existing information and scientific
advice would provide additional input to improve both the reliability and acceptance of model
predictions. However, it was agreed model review alone would not adequately resolve
uncertainties, and that direct assessment of heritability of anadromous behavior would be
required to inform the Nerkid model.
2. Experimental Hatchery Fry Release: it was agreed that continuing the current program of
monitoring Kokanee, smolts and Sockeye adult returns will not fill the knowledge gaps and
resolve uncertainties, as Sockeye offspring have not been detected. Recent Alouette Sockeye
Hatchery upgrades will allow the project to raise Kokanee X Kokanee and Sockeye X Sockeye
offspring. These progeny will be raised to the fry life stage and then released into Alouette
Reservoir. This information will fill a number of knowledge gaps (health status of Sockeye,
eggs viability, fry-to-smolt survival, smolt-to-adults survival, and disposition to outmigration).
Additionally, this information will be used in the Nerkid model to estimate the propensity of
returning Sockeye to have smolting offspring. PLEASE NOTE: THIS ELEMENT OF THE PLAN HAS
BEEN PUT ON HOLD UNTIL THE PEER REVIEWED RESULTS BY THE CANADIAN SCIENCE
ADVISORY SECRETARIAT (DFO) OF THE NERKID MODEL AND ALOUETTE SOCKEYE
RESTORATION PLAN HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
3. Experimental Hatchery Fry Release and Program Review: the ARSRP is a broad, complex
program and anticipated introduction of wild-stock hatchery fish into the reservoir comes with
risks as well as benefits. We recognize that the experimental hatchery program will greatly
benefit the Fish Passage Decision Framework applied to Alouette Sockeye, but it should be done
in a well-reasoned and scientifically defensible way. This option would see the entire ARSRP and
the Nerkid Model undergo a rigorous scientific review through the Canadian Science Advisory
Secretariat (CSAS) review process, focusing on the short- and long-term implications of Sockeye
release and hatchery supplementation for genetic and population integrity. Both the program
review and hatchery supplementation can occur in tandem with the review concluding before
any fish are released into the reservoir.
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility Plan (2017-2027) 3 | Page
DRAFT – COA-F19-F-2683
The committee agreed that the feasibility plan should include both a program review and a hatchery
supplementation program (option 3) that would continue for two life-cycles (stock for 8 years, monitor
for a further 3 years), which will allow examination of heritability and density dependence, as well as
confirm whether restoration goals are feasible.
Alouette Sockeye Restoration Feasibility Plan
There are several management questions that this feasibility plan will attempt to answer:
1. Does the nerkid model adequately consider the factors driving Sockeye smolting rates in the
Alouette watershed?
2. What is the minimum viable population for returning adult Sockeye that would conserve the genetic
integrity and ensure long-term persistence of Sockeye/Kokanee in the Alouette watershed?
3. What are the long-term projections for the Sockeye run size?
4. Is it feasible to restore Sockeye to a minimum viable population given potential uncertainty relating
to the heritability of smolting behavior, fry production, density dependence, spawning habitat
availability and marine survival?
4.1. How heritable is smolting behavior within the Alouette nerkid population?
4.2. Is there sufficient spawning habitat to produce the numbers of fry required to support a
minimum viable population for Sockeye?
5. Can the Alouette Sockeye hatchery meet Department of Fisheries and Oceans requirements while
producing enough fry to fulfill study requirements to answer the questions above?
If answers to these questions indicate that Sockeye restoration is not possible, if there are significant
risks to Kokanee or the environment, or that initial hatchery operation cannot support the restoration
plan adequately (either due to biological concerns raised in the Program Review or due to insufficient
rearing capacity), this feasibility plan will be paused while the ARSRP re-evaluates the plan.
To address these remaining management questions, a number of monitoring tasks need to be
implemented in concert with hatchery operations over an 11-year program.
Project Outline:
Task 1 - Canadian Scientific Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Review of Nerkid Model and Alouette Program
Task 2 – Spawning habitat assessment and Kokanee spawner behavior
Task 3 – Alouette Sockeye and Kokanee Hatchery Operations (CURRENTLY WAITING ON TASK 1
RESULTS OF THE CSAS PEER REVIEW, HATCHERY COMPONENT ON HOLD FOR YEAR 2)
Task 4 – Adult and smolt enumeration
Task 5 - Acoustic assessment of density dependent effects
Task 6 – Smolting heritability assessment
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility Plan (2017-2027) 4 | Page
DRAFT – COA-F19-F-2683
The tasks above would be delivered over 3 phases, scheduled over an 11-year timeframe.
• Phase 1: Scientific Review and Hatchery Initiation Phase – Tasks 1 to 5 will be implemented in
this two-year start-up phase, with a decision to carry on to phase 2 contingent on the hatchery
successfully raising fry and the scientific review (CSAS) confirming Sockeye restoration is
feasible.
• Phase 2: Hatchery fry releases and monitoring – Tasks 2-6 are implemented over a 6-year
period to evaluate the effects of hatchery use on reservoir productivity, and whether
smoltification is hereditary. A decision to carry on to Phase 3 is contingent on adults returning
to the dam and successful hatchery operation/fry production and signals from the studies that
Sockeye restoration is feasible.
• Phase 3: Monitoring, Hatchery work completed - Tasks 4-6 are implemented over a 3-year
period to monitor the remaining returns to the dam and finally determine the heritability of
smolting.
Upon successful determination that restoration goals can be met without the hatchery, the committee
will be submitting a fish passage proposal to FWCP for endorsement.
Phase 1, Year 1 - Project Milestones
Currently this project is in Phase 1 (2-year term): Scientific Review and Hatchery Initiation Phase – Tasks
1 to 5 (except Task 3) will be implemented in this two- year start-up phase, with a decision to carry on to
phase 2 contingent on the scientific review (CSAS) confirming Sockeye restoration is feasible.
Since February 2017, when conditional approval of the Phase 1 - Year 1 project was given, the Alouette
River Management Society has been working with its partners to implement the individual tasks of the
above multi-year, multi-stakeholder project.
• Task 4 - April 10 – Rotary screw trap (RST) for the kokanee/Sockeye smolt outmigration installed in
the South Alouette River at the Mud Creek location by LGL Limited and Katzie First Nation.
• Task 4 - April 12 to June 1 – Kokanee smolt outmigration ran under the supervision of LGL Limited
and Katzie First Nation. Two new Katzie technicians were trained this year to run the RST.
• Task 2 - May to June – MOE starts the Alouette Lake spawner habitat mapping
• Task 4 - June 15 –Adult Sockeye monitoring starts with BC Corrections inmate crew.
• Task 4 - July to August –ARMS supervise sampling of adult sockeye.
• Task 2 - September 11-12 – MOE set gill net traps at Alouette Lake to start the kokanee spawner
survey. Survey to run until approximately early January 2018 or until they have determined the
spawning season is over.
• Interim report and expenses submitted to FWCP – October 2017
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility Plan (2017-2027) 5 | Page
DRAFT – COA-F19-F-2683
Alouette Watershed Sockeye - Determination of fish Passage Feasibility - Revised Timeline – October 18, 2017
Phase 2 (6 Years)Phase 1 (2 Years)Phase 3 (3 years)October 18, 2017Note: MVP = Minimum Viable Population
Can the Alouette
Watershed meet the MVP?
(CSAS Review)
Enough adults Sockeye
Returns for broodstock?
Can the Hatchery Raise
Kokanee and sockeye fry?
Is the Plan Feasible?
YES
YES
T1: CSAS Review
T2: Spawning Assessment
T4: Smolt Enumeration
T4: Adult Enumeration
T5: Acoustic Assessment
T2: Kokanee Spawner Behavior
T3: ALU Hatchery Raising Fry
T4: Smolt Enumeration
T4: Adult Enumeration
T5: Acoustic Assessment
T6: Heritability Assessment
Re - evaluate the plan
NO
NO
NO
Re - evaluate the plan
Endorsement
YES
New plan required
T2: Spawner Habitat Use
T3: ALU Hatchery Stops
T4: Smolt Enumeration
T4: Adult Enumeration
T5: Acoustic Assessment
T6: Heritability Assessment
Figure 1. Timeline of Alouette Watershed Sockeye - Determination of Feasibility Plan. The 11 year plan has been displayed in three
phases according to scheduled data collection events and decision making opportunities
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility Plan (2017-2027) 6 | Page
DRAFT – COA-F19-F-2683
PHASE 1 – YEAR 2
TASK DESCRIPTIONS
Task 1 - Canadian Scientific Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Review of the Nerkid Model and ARSRP Plan
To answer the first management question, the BC Ministry of Environment and Fisheries and Oceans
Canada will continue with the review of the nerkid model and the overall ARSRP plan through a
publication peer review and scientific advisory (CSAS) review, respectively. The overall plan will be
reviewed for biological risks that may result from potential ecological, genetic or disease ramifications of
the project, as per DFO’s A Biological Risk Management Framework for Enhancing Salmon in the Pacific
Region. The publication submittal process is currently in progress at the time of writing and will result in
model review and improvement while providing a more detailed summary of the model and predictions.
The CSAS review process will be completed by summer 2018, and will result in (a) the determination of a
minimum viable population required to meet genetic and productivity requirements for a restored
Sockeye run; and (b) formal DFO endorsement of the nerkid model and an assessment of the feasibility
and risks of Sockeye restoration in the Alouette watershed.
• Leads: Brett van Poorten (MOE); Dan Selbie (DFO)
• Completion: Publication – Fall 2017; CSAS Review and Assessment – Summer 2018
• Costs: ~$11,500 In-kind
• Decision support: The CSAS review will define the minimum run size for Alouette Sockeye
restoration. If the CSAS review concludes that Sockeye restoration is not biologically feasible
beyond the current condition, or biological risks are excessive, this program plan will be paused
while the ARSRP re-evaluates the plan.
Task 2 – Spawning habitat capacity and Kokanee spawner behavior
Natural fry production will be limited by availability of spawning habitat, number of spawners, and
spawning success (egg-fry survival). There is currently limited information available on reservoir
spawning habitat due to the difficulty in observing deep-water (20-60 m) Kokanee/Sockeye spawning.
Therefore habitat capacity is still undefined in Alouette Reservoir but it is a necessary component of the
CSAS review and will be needed for FWCP endorsement within the Framework. Investigations of habitat
quality (substrate type), quantity and distribution were identified in 2017 with the use of a Ministry of
Environment drop-camera system which was upgraded to adapt it for this purpose. The habitat mapping
component will continue in spring of 2018 to complete the work started in 2017. Data will be compiled
and evaluated using GIS to determine total spawning habitat quality and quantity. Information from this
work will provide estimates of spawning habitat area available in the reservoir and thus estimates of the
maximum Kokanee and Sockeye population the reservoir can support based on habitat availability.
Furthermore, based on data collected from this task and spawner behavior, we can evaluate
Management Question 4.2 to determine if there is enough quality spawning habitat to support a self-
sustaining population and meet restoration goals.
Information on the spawning behavior of Kokanee and Sockeye is currently lacking, but is critical for the
successful collection of broodstock for the experimental hatchery. We propose using short set
gillnetting during the fall and winter to determine the Kokanee spawning window, and to collect data on
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility Plan (2017-2027) 7 | Page
DRAFT – COA-F19-F-2683
the stage of maturity. Nets will be set based on substrate distribution identified in the habitat
assessment and mapping work described above. Information on spawner timing and behavior is
necessary for planning the efficient collection of mature (but not spawning or spent) Kokanee for the
hatchery. This task is necessary for the remainder of tasks (i.e. you need spawners for a hatchery).
• Lead: Shannon Harris and Allison Hebert (MOE), Brent Wilson (BCH)
• Completion: 2018 (started in 2017)
• Cost: $60,773 in year 1, $45,000/yr in years 1-2* + in-kind and other support
o While sampling for spawner behavior study is underway, broodstock will be collected
and therefore costs for broodstock collection are in kind for year one.
o *costs for year 1-2 represent an estimate, actual field time will be determined based on
results of year 1
• Decision support: It is necessary to identify spawning habitat quality and quantity within the
reservoir to understand whether restoration objectives are achievable; and it is necessary to
characterize spawning behavior to better understand the timing of the Kokanee spawning to
inform Kokanee broodstock collection. Our existing production models do not account for limits
to spawning habitat per se, but they are implicitly incorporated as part of potential density
dependent limits to survival. Having actual estimates of spawning habitat will help inform the
parameters of the nerkid model.
Task 3 – Alouette Sockeye and Kokanee Hatchery operations
Note: Task 3 will not be included in this funding application for 2017-2018 season but the details
remain for information purposes only.
Katzie First Nations and the ARSRP committee agreed that hatchery operations were required to
generate enough fry to address remaining management questions and validate the Nerkid model.
Adult Sockeye captured at the ALLCO fish fence in early summer will be held until maturity in the
Alouette Sockeye Hatchery. All adults will have a rapid genetic sample taken to ensure they are Alouette
stock before they can be used for broodstock. Beginning in late September determination of the
spawning window for Kokanee will be undertaken until spawning Kokanee are located and captured.
Ripe adults will be stripped in the field and then transferred to the hatchery to be fertilized separately as
pure Sockeye or pure Kokanee. Progeny of both Sockeye and Kokanee will be raised to fry stage. The
program will be working closely with the DFO fish health specialist’s veterinarian in all years of hatchery
operation to ensure that all fish are disease free.
Numbers of fry released will vary by year, which increases variation in in-reservoir density. This variation
in density may cause different environmentally-driven smolting rates, thereby improving estimates
genetic versus environmental drivers of smolting while also limiting hatchery costs. On an annual basis,
either 10,000 or 30,000 fry will be released into the reservoir with each fry type differentially marked to
quickly and inexpensively identify Kokanee or Sockeye hatchery offspring vs. wild Kokanee (unmarked).
Total number of fry released must exceed 10,000 (total: Kokanee + Sockeye) to contribute to the study
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility Plan (2017-2027) 8 | Page
DRAFT – COA-F19-F-2683
tasks. If the number of returning Sockeye broodstock collected cannot provide for this number of fry,
the hatchery will not be operated that fall.
Task 4 – Adult and smolt enumeration
Trapping of adult Sockeye returning to Alouette Dam is required to facilitate the hatchery operation and
is a vital for overall program feasibility. As in the past, operation of the Alouette Corrections fish fence
will be carried out in partnership with the Alouette River Management Society and BC Corrections staff.
Adults will have a genetic sample and scale sample taken to ensure they are Alouette stock and to age
them. If the experimental hatchery is approved in later years, the adult sockeye will be also examined
for clips starting in possibly 2020 (pending funding); wild -no clip, hatchery Kokanee clip-type 1 or
hatchery Sockeye clip-type 2 then transported to the hatchery for holding.
The kokanee smolt enumeration component would capture outmigrating smolts starting early spring
2018 using a rotary screw trap below Alouette Dam. The trap would be set up at the Mud Creek location
as a joint operation between Katzie First Nation and LGL Limited to replicate sampling methods and the
safety program used in previous years. In contrast to previous years only Sockeye and Kokanee smolts
would be identified, sampled and then released, information on other species would not be collected.
Scales samples used for aging and fin clip samples used for genetic testing will be collected from each
smolt enumerated.
The operation of the trap would coincide with the timing of the surface flow releases for smolt
outmigration from Alouette Reservoir (April 15 until either early June or when the smolts are done,
whichever comes first). This information will feed directly into the Nerkid model that requires smolt
estimates and parentage data to be able to refine model predictions of adult returns (Task 7).
If the experimental sockeye hatchery component is approved in future years, this would see in likely
2020, each captured smolt being identified as: wild (no clip); hatchery Kokanee (clip-type 1); or hatchery
Sockeye (clip-type 2).
• Leads: Greta Borick-Cunningham and Sophie Smith (ARMS), Ron MacLean (BC Corrections),
Debbie Miller (Katzie First Nations) and Meghan Matthews (LGL),
• Completion: Phase 1, 2 and 3: Spring 2024 (10 years, continuing with truck and trap operation
late spring 2018)
• Cost: $16,028/yr for adult work, $61,075 per year for smolt enumeration
• Decision support:
o Adults: returning adult counts are the key indicator of overall restoration plan success. The
degree to which the adult returns are genetically linked to hatchery-released fry will
determine differential smolt-adult survival of each parentage combination (pure Kokanee;
pure Sockeye).
o Smolts: During the spring flow releases from Alouette Dam, when outmigration monitoring
observes the end of the annual outmigration period, surface flow releases will be suspended
and minimum flows restored through the low level outlet at the Alouette Dam. The degree
to which the outmigrating smolts are shown to be genetically linked to wild or hatchery-
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility Plan (2017-2027) 9 | Page
DRAFT – COA-F19-F-2683
released fry of each parentage combination (pure Kokanee; pure Sockeye) will determine
the effect of heritability on smolting behavior.
Task 5 - Acoustic assessment of density dependent effects
In 2018, as part of the Ministry of Environment’s (MOE) ongoing implementation of the nutrient
restoration program on the Alouette Reservoir, annual gillnetting, trawling and hydroacoustic stock
assessment results will be evaluated. to determine if hatchery fry additions are having a measurable
impact on the growth rate or mortality of the Kokanee juvenile age classes in Alouette Reservoir.
Resident Nerkids captured during trawl sampling will be identified as: wild (no clip), hatchery Kokanee
(clip-type 1) or hatchery Sockeye (clip-type 2) starting in 2020 (pending CSAS results expected in summer
2018). This information will help to resolve whether variations in smolting numbers are due to
differential mortality or differential smolting rate.
• Lead: Shannon Harris and Brett van Poorten (MOE),
• Completion: Phase 1, 2 and 3, Spring 2024 (8 years, starting with summer acoustics 2017)
• Cost: ~$17,000 in-kind support
• Decision support: The degree to which density of fry influences body growth rate and mortality
will be incorporated into the nerkid model to inform whether restoration is feasible under
observed conditions.
Task 6 – Heritability of Smoltification
Alouette is the first known case where previously residualized Sockeye have begun smolting after
marine access was permitted. The rate at which smolting is heritable (the genetic vs. environmental
influence of smolting) is completely unknown, yet has tremendous implications for success of
restoration or fish passage construction.
The Nerkid model will be fit to data collected in tasks 2-6 to determine heritability and refine estimates
of carrying capacity for Kokanee and Sockeye. Model outputs will include projections for Sockeye and
Kokanee for the foreseeable future. This will form the basis for submission a request to BC Hydro for fish
passage and mark the end of ARSRP submissions to the FWCP.
• Lead: Brett van Poorten (MOE),
• Completion: Phase 2, 3: 2019-2027
• Cost: all in-kind support
• Decision support: Model outcomes, paired with findings from all other tasks and feasibility
studies to date, will form the basis for submission to BC Hydro for fish passage infrastructure, as
part of the Fish Passage Decision Framework.
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility Plan (2017-2027) 10 | Page
DRAFT – COA-F19-F-2683
Schedule:
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Tasks in the Feasibility Plan 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Task 1 Model Peer/CSAS Review
Task 2 Spawner habitat mapping
and spawner behavior
Kokanee broodstock
collection × ×
Spawner habitat use
Task 3 Hatchery Raising Fry × ×
Task 4 Adult and Smolt
Enumeration
Task 5 Acoustic Assessment of
Density Dependence
Task 6 Heritability of
smoltification
Task implemented for the given year
Task implemented subject to other
study result
× Task not approved for funding and
did not proceed
Note: Table updated 16 October
2017
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility Plan (2017-2027) 11 |
Page
DRAFT – COA-F19-F-2683
Literature Cited
Alouette River Watershed Action Plan – September 28, 2017. Ver. 9.0 Final draft. Prepared by BC Hydro
Alouette Watershed Plan – draft, October 2011. Prepared by BC Hydro
Alouette Watershed Salmonid Action Plan – final, October 2011. Prepared by BC Hydro
Crowston, A. 2012. Alouette Adult Sockeye Enumeration 2011 (report) Prepared for BC Hydro in 2012.
Godbout, L., Wood, C.C., Withler, R.E., Latham, S., Nelson, R.J., Wetzel, L., Barnett-Johnson, R., Grove,
M.J., Schmitt, A.K., and McKeegan, K.D. 2011. Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) return after
an absence of nearly 90 years: a case of reversion to anadromy. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 68(9):
1590-1602.
Godbout, L., Wood, C.C., Withler, R.E., Latham, S., Nelson, R.J., Wetzel, L., Barnett-Johnson, R., Grove,
M.J., Schmitt, A.K., and McKeegan, K.D. 2011. Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) return after
an absence of nearly 90 years: a case of reversion to anadromy. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 68(9):
1590-1602.
Godbout, L, C. C. Wood, R. Withler, D. Menard, and A. Ogden. 2013. Assessment of smolt production
from anadromous O. nerka transferred into the Alouette Reservoir: Brood years 2008-2010. FWCP
Report 54 p.
Godbout, L, C. C. Wood, R. Withler, D. Menard, and M. Obrien 2014. Assessment of smolt production
from anadromous O. nerka transferred into the Alouette Reservoir: Brood years 2008-2012. FWCP
Report XX.
Godbout L. and C.C. Wood. Experimental release of hatchery-reared sea-run Kokanee into Alouette
Reservoir to evaluate the feasibility of re-establishing Sockeye salmon. Supplement of
Information. Distributed to ARSRP team. 2015. 7p.
Harris, S., Hebert, A., (Ministry of Environment) and Wilson, B. (BC Hydro). 2017 unpublished summary.
NSS_2017-10-06-FWCP Interim Summary, FWCP Project COA-F18-F-2385. Task 2 – Assessment of
Reservoir Spawning Habitat & Onchorhynchus nerka Reproductive Behaviour.
M. A. Mathews, J. J. Smith, and R. C. Bocking (LGL Limited) 2014. Evaluation of the Migration Success of
O. nerka (Kokanee/Sockeye) from the Alouette Reservoir. Report prepared for BC Hydro WUP
study ALUMON 2. 2014.
Plate, E.M., Mathews, M.A., and Bocking, R.C. (LGL Limited). 2014. Technical Feasibility and
Recommendations for Alouette Lake Sockeye Salmon Re-Establishment Above the Alouette Dam.
October 2014. Prepared for BC Hydro Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program.
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Determination of Fish Passage Feasibility Plan (2017-2027) 12 |
Page
DRAFT – COA-F19-F-2683
Smith, Jason J. (LGL Limited) 2017. Unpublished summary. Alouette_Katzie-LGL_2017 Narrative Interim
report.
Smith, S and G. Borick-Cunningham (ARMS). 2016. Experimental Release of Hatchery Reared Sea-Run
Kokanee into Alouette Reservoir to Evaluate the Feasibility of Re-establishing Sockeye Salmon Run
– 2015. Final Report prepared for BC Hydro’s FWCP – Coastal.
van Poorten, B.T., S. Harris, A. Hebert. In review. Sockeye recovery projections for a highly managed
mixed kokanee-sockeye system. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2017
1
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Fish Passage Feasibility – Year 2 – Proposal – COA-F19-F-2683
Proposal for Alouette Watershed Sockeye - Fish Passage Feasibility - Year 2
COA-F19-F-2683
Project Summary Statement
Instructional Note: Provide a succinct project summary statement that describes your proposed project.
This is the project description that will be used in future FWCP communications about this project. It
should be plain language and communicate what the project is about and what outcomes are expected
The Alouette River Sockeye Re-anadromization Program (ARSRP) is a joint initiative between the Katzie
First Nation, ARMS, BC Hydro, Ministry of Environment (MOE), Department of Fisheries and Oceans
(DFO), LGL Limited and local stakeholders, which works to promote the re-establishment of anadromous
Alouette Sockeye and investigate the feasibility of fish passage at Alouette Dam. This project will:
1. Undertake/continue with a peer review and a formal DFO Canadian Scientific Advisory
Secretariat (CSAS) review of the ARSRP program and review MOE’s Nerkid Model to determine if
it can accurately forecast Sockeye restoration feasibility
2. Monitor adult Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) returns and juvenile outmigration
necessary for the evaluation of heritability and for eventual FWCP endorsement
3. Determine availability of spawner habitat in the Alouette reservoir to confirm it can support a
self-sustaining population
What is the urgency of your proposed project?
Instructional Note: Please describe and justify the urgency of your proposed project.
Sockeye restoration in the Alouette Watershed was identified as a key priority in FWCP’s
Alouette Salmonid Action Plan (2011) and the Alouette River Watershed Action Plan (2017), and
is of significant cultural importance to the Katzie First Nation. The ARSRP committee has been
working to resolve uncertainties around feasibility of Sockeye restoration in the Alouette
watershed for over 14 years. After failing to receive funding in 2016, a workshop was held with
senior Katzie, DFO, BC Hydro, MOE and political leads to re-assess the fish passage plan. All
attendees agreed that key actions are to validate predictions from MOE’s Nerkid model, recently
published in the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, and have the model
undergo formal DFO (CSAS) review. The group unanimously agreed that this work is urgently
needed to address remaining uncertainties that are essential for making an informed decision
regarding fish passage at Alouette Dam. Delaying this work will lengthen the ARSRP fish passage
plan and risks losing the good-will generated from the workshop.
Project Details Section
Your project will primarily benefit fish or wildlife
Fish
2
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Fish Passage Feasibility – Year 2 – Proposal – COA-F19-F-2683
What species will benefit from your project?
The primary design species associated with this project is resident and anadromous Sockeye
salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka).
Detailed Project Description
This project is Year 2 of a multi-year plan to address remaining uncertainties in the feasibility of Alouette
Sockeye Restoration. This proposal would initiate the second year of Phase 1 of the plan, which focuses
on: a review of the Nerkid model, review of the Alouette River Sockeye Re-anadromization Program
(ARSRP), finalizing the mapping field work and estimates of habitat capacity for spawners; monitoring
smolt outmigration; and monitoring adult returns.
The ARSRP Plan and the Nerkid model is currently being reviewed by the DFO lead, Canadian Science
Advisory Secretariat (CSAS). The review will investigate and report on our overall plan including 1) the
structure and findings of the Nerkid model; 2) limits to Kokanee and Sockeye production as estimated
from investigations of available habitat; and 3) calculations of genetic consequences of continued
release of smolts and the Sockeye/Kokanee hatchery program. The review will focus on short- and long-
term implications of Sockeye smolting for genetic and population integrity.
The second task is to complete the evaluation of spawning habitat availability throughout the reservoir
which was started in 2017. We will survey substrate composition throughout the reservoir using an
upgraded drop-down camera provided in-kind by the Ministry of Environment. The results from this
assessment will provide a comprehensive map of spawning locations within the reservoir and a
calculation of total available spawning habitat which is necessary to determine if there is sufficient
habitat available for successful Sockeye restoration.
Monitoring of outmigrating smolts and returning adults will continue as the third task of this proposal.
The smolt enumeration component would capture outmigrating smolts during the spring surface flow
releases in April 2018 using a rotary screw trap below Alouette Dam. This information will feed directly
into the nerkid model.
The final component of this proposal is to monitor adult Sockeye captured at the ALLCO fish fence from
late spring/early summer 2018 until early fall 2018 or when the run is determined to be finished by DFO.
All adults will have a genetic sample taken to ensure they are Alouette stock including a scale sample to
determine the years spent in the ocean.
Alignment with Action Plans Section
The primary Coastal Action/Watershed Plan that this proposed project aligns most closely
with is:
Instruction Note: From the drop down list provided, select the applicable primary plan.
Alouette River Watershed Action Plan (2017)
What is the primary project type for the proposed project?
3
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Fish Passage Feasibility – Year 2 – Proposal – COA-F19-F-2683
Instruction Note: We want to know more about your project. The FWCP funds several types of
projects or actions. Please select the ‘project type’ that best describes the type of project you
are proposing. Select only one. If you are not sure, please refer to the primary Plan.
Species-based Actions
ALU.RLR.SB.18.01 Conduct technical feasibility assessment...Sockeye Salmon passage at
Alouette Dam
What is your priority action from the primary Plan specified above? (400 characters)
Instruction Note: Please copy and paste the applicable priority action from the specified
primary plan. For example, if your primary plan is the Cheakamus River Salmonid Action Plan
and you are proposing to improve existing side channels and off channel areas for salmonids,
you would copy and paste the following priority action 'Improve existing side channels and off
channel areas for salmonids'. Please ensure that you are selecting specific priority actions rather
than broad Action Plan objectives, measures and targets. Please contact the Coastal Region
Manager if you require clarification.
Conduct technical feasibility assessment, monitoring and/or species-based actions associated
with Sockeye Salmon passage at Alouette Dam to support re-introduction to the Alouette
system. Work must build upon the Alouette River Sockeye Re-Introduction Synthesis
(13.ALU.02) and the Alouette Watershed Sockeye-fish passage Feasibility (COA-F18-F-2385).
Proponents looking for an FWCP grant to evaluate opportunities to restore fish production
above BC Hydro facilities that previously blocked fish passage are required to work through the
Fish Passage Decision Framework (http://fwcp.ca/fish-passage-decision-framework/).
Clearly articulate how your proposed project will address the Action specified
Instruction Note: For example: this project will include the assessment of side channel and off
channel habitat resulting in specific restoration and enhancement opportunities in the Cheakamus
watershed.
The nerkid model predicts that Sockeye restoration will not impact the Kokanee fishery in the
reservoir through density dependent interactions. The group developed a multi-year plan; in the
second year, we propose to:
(a) Complete the formal DFO-CSAS review of the ARSRP plan and the Nerkid Model
(b) Complete the assessment of spawning habitat availability and behavior in the reservoir
which will allow for a better understanding of limiting factors in the reservoir
(c) Monitor adult returns and juvenile outmigration to provide an estimate of smolt to adult
survival.
4
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Fish Passage Feasibility – Year 2 – Proposal – COA-F19-F-2683
The secondary Coastal Plan that this proposed project aligns most closely with is
Instruction Note: If your proposed project aligns with more than one Plan, provide information
on a secondary Plan. If your project aligns with one Plan, select 'No Action Plan'. If you specified
the 'Watershed Plan' as your primary plan, then select 'No Action Plan'.
No secondary action plan
What is the secondary project type for the proposed project?
Instruction Note: The FWCP recognizes that some projects may include elements of more than
one FWCP project type. Please refer to your primary and /or secondary Plan and select the
project type(s).
N/A
What is your priority action from the secondary Plan specified above? (400 characters)
Instruction Note: Please copy and paste the applicable priority action from the specified
secondary plan. For example, if your secondary plan is the Cheakamus River Salmonid Action
Plan and you are proposing to improve existing side channels and off channel areas for
salmonids, you would copy and paste the following priority action 'Improve existing side
channels and off channel areas for salmonids'. Please ensure that you are selecting specific
priority actions rather than broad Action Plan objectives, measures and targets. Please contact
the Coastal Region Manager if you require clarification.
N/A
Clearly articulate how your proposed project will address the secondary Action specified (800
characters)
Instruction Note: For example: this project will include the assessment of side channel and off
channel habitat resulting in specific restoration and enhancement opportunities in the
Cheakamus watershed.
N/A
Benefits Section
Benefits to Fish and/or wildlife
Instruction Note: Please list all benefits that your proposed project is anticipated to achieve and
provide a description for each. At the project conclusion, you will be asked to report on these
benefits and whether you achieved them or not.
Options include:
Restoration of Ecosystem Yes - Restoring sockeye salmon and other species to the
Upper Alouette Watershed thus providing essential nutrients to the ecological balance
5
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Fish Passage Feasibility – Year 2 – Proposal – COA-F19-F-2683
of the Alouette Reservoir and reinstating the historical spawning grounds of the
Alouette sockeye.
Species Conservation Yes - Pursuing the reanadromization of the Alouette watershed
both upper and lower with Alouette sockeye, a species which was landlocked from 1928
when the Alouette dam was completed
Species Protection Yes - Substantially increasing the number of sockeye fry therefore
maintaining future opportunities for restoration. (NOTE: Hatchery portion of the 11-
year plan is not part of this Year 2 Proposal
Improve Science and Knowledge Yes – Undertaking Canadian Science Advisory
Secretariat Review (CSAS)
Community Engagement Yes - Actively promoting the work of the ARSRP group in the
Maple Ridge and Pitt Meadows communities and beyond through social media including
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and attending community festivals which feature an
environmental focus, press releases to local papers and radio stations, inclusion of
articles in a regular newsletter to membership, and other awareness-raising activities
and presentations.
Other
Is ongoing monitoring and maintenance required to sustain the benefits to fish and/or wildlife?
Instruction Note: For example, maintaining spawning channel intake structure.
Not in year 2
Describe the benefits of this project to local First Nations, stakeholders and/or communities, including
any proposed opportunities for community engagement, education and outreach.
You will be asked about progress on these benefits on reports that you submit.
There are a wide range of benefits to Katzie First Nation, stakeholders and communities including Maple
Ridge, Pitt Meadows and others. The Katzie First Nation will benefit from this project through working
directly on the downstream smolt enumeration and the spawner habitat study while developing
increased environmental skill sets. The ultimate goal of the Katzie First Nation would be to realize a self-
sustaining population of Sockeye salmon, a population of significant cultural value to current and future
generations. The project will develop a body of scientific knowledge that will help inform the Alouette
River Sockeye Re-anadromization Committee, BC Hydro and other watersheds potentially looking at fish
passage feasibility. The City of Maple Ridge and the City of Pitt Meadows will benefit from this project’s
broad-reaching research, monitoring and evaluation components as the information will directly help to
support the feasibility of fish passage on the Alouette Dam. If the hatchery component is approved in
the future, the enhancement of the Alouette Reservoir with Sockeye fry will provide an excellent
promotional opportunity for the cities in terms of raising awareness about the potential for a Sockeye
salmon run in their local regions.
6
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Fish Passage Feasibility – Year 2 – Proposal – COA-F19-F-2683
Other benefits include the multi-party collaboration with the common goal of achieving fish passage on
the Alouette dam.
Opportunities for community engagement, education and outreach are many and varied. The
proponent will continue to work with its different partners to promote the work of the Alouette River
Sockeye Re-anadromization Project and the Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program including but not
limited to local festivals such as Maple Ridge Celebrate Earth Day, Pitt Meadows Earth Day, Maple Ridge
Park Father’s Day Fish Release, Haney Farmers Markets, Maple Ridge Country Fest, and Ridge Meadows
Rivers Day. The proponent would also present the work of the ARSRP group to the City of Maple Ridge
Mayor and Council, City of Pitt Meadows Mayor and Council, Katzie First Nation Chief and Council and
any other local elected officials and community groups e.g. Lions Club, Rotary Club, Kiwanis Club that
may be interested in learning about the Alouette Watershed Sockeye Fish Passage Feasibility project.
Press releases will be sent to the local newspapers, radio and other relevant media sources. Articles will
be sent to relevant and interested parties including DFO’s StreamTalk magazine, FWCP e-newsletter,
Salmon Enhancement and Habitat Advisory Board (SEHAB) annual meeting, BC Federation of Driftfishers
etc.
Project Phases Section
Project Start-up
State Date, End Date, what happens in this phase
This project will continue with the review of the ARSRP Plan and the MOE Nerkid Model to the Canadian
Scientific Advisory Secretariat (CSAS). The CSAS review will complete the minimum viable population
analysis to be developed by DFO in the summer of 2018 with in-kind funding.
Upon notice of successful funding for year 2 of the project, the ARSRP will meet in February 2018 for
field work coordination and scheduling for the spring smolt outmigration work and habitat suitability
assessment prior to work beginning in April 2018.
Field Work
State Date, End Date, what happens in this phase
The Rotary Screw Trap (RST) will be installed in April 2018, to coincide with the scheduled spring surface
flow releases at Alouette Dam. The RST will be installed at the same Mud Creek location to replicate the
sampling methods and safety program used in previous years. The trap will capture and enumerate only
outmigrating Sockeye and Kokanee smolts, which is essential information for the nerkid model. Smolt
outmigration timing is usually complete by June 15. Collection of tissue samples for DNA analysis from
smolts will be carried out during the spring enumeration work and sent to Pacific Biological Station (PBS)
lab for analysis. The spawner habitat assessment study will continue in April/May 2018 with a full
assessment of deep water spawning habitat in the reservoir. Acoustic assessment of density
dependence will occur as part of the Alouette fertilization program with the information collected
summer 2018. In late spring (mid-June) 2018, the ALLCO fish fence will be installed and monitored daily.
Any returning adult Sockeye will be captured and will have genetic (DNA) samples taken to verify they
7
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Fish Passage Feasibility – Year 2 – Proposal – COA-F19-F-2683
are Alouette stock and scale samples for aging. The samples are processed at the Pacific Biological
Station in Nanaimo (DFO in-kind) with results analyzed and compiled into a report back to the ARSRP
group and FWCP. Returning sockeye adults will be trucked to the Alouette Lake and released once
samples have been taken. In the fall and winter of 2018 investigations of Kokanee spawning locations
will continue as in 2017 in the reservoir.
Data Entry & Analysis
State Date, End Date, what happens in this phase
Data analysis will continue with the CSAS review of the ARSRP and the Nerkid model beginning in fall of
2017-winter of 2018; final results are not anticipated until summer 2018. Data entry will begin in spring
of 2018 with the completion of the spawner habitat availability surveys and the continuation of the
smolt outmigration monitoring. Final data collected from the spawner habitat availability study will be
compiled by a GIS specialist to evaluate Sockeye/Kokanee spawning locations, to create a calculation of
the amount of spawner habitat available and to assess if habitat is limiting in the summer of 2018.
Following the completion of the smolt outmigration monitor, biological samples such as, fin clip and
scale samples will be sent to the PBS for rapid genetic analysis as soon as possible after the fish have
been trapped and sampled. Adult sockeye enumeration at the Allco fish fence will occur as Alouette
Sockeye returns are anticipated in from early/mid July to late August 2018. Data analysis will continue in
the fall once the results of the adult sockeye returnees have been received.
Draft Reporting
State Date, End Date, what happens in this phase
The project lead identified in each task of the plan will be responsible for completion of their respective
section of the summary report. Each project lead must report on the activities completed and will
summarize findings for inclusion in a larger report during the fall/winter of 2018.
Task 1 - Canadian Scientific Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Review of Sockeye Response Model and
Alouette Program
Task 2 – Spawning habitat assessment and kokanee spawner behavior
Task 3 – Alouette Sockeye Hatchery Operations – THIS TASK IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS FWCP
APPLICATION BUT HERE FOR PLAN INFORMATION ONLY
Task 4 – Adult and smolt enumeration
Task 5 - Acoustic assessment of density dependent effects
Extension/Community/Outreach
State Date, End Date, what happens in this phase
8
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Fish Passage Feasibility – Year 2 – Proposal – COA-F19-F-2683
There are a wide range of benefits to Katzie First Nation, Maple Ridge, Pitt Meadows and others. The
Katzie First Nation will benefit from this project through having staff working directly on the
downstream smolt enumeration study and the spawner habitat study while developing increased
environmental skill sets. The ultimate goal of the Katzie First Nation would be to realize a self-sustaining
population of Sockeye salmon, a population of significant cultural value to current and future
generations. The project will develop a body of scientific knowledge that will help inform the Alouette
River Sockeye Re-anadromization Committee, BC Hydro and other watersheds potentially looking at fish
passage feasibility. The City of Maple Ridge and the City of Pitt Meadows will benefit from this project’s
broad-reaching research, monitoring and evaluation components as the information will directly help to
support the feasibility of fish passage on the Alouette Dam. If funding is approved in the future,
enhancement of the Alouette Reservoir with Sockeye fry will provide an excellent promotional
opportunity for the cities in terms of raising awareness about the potential for a Sockeye salmon run in
their local regions. Other benefits include the multi-party collaboration with the common goal of
achieving fish passage on the Alouette dam.
Final Reporting
State Date, End Date, what happens in this phase
Final reporting will begin with compilation from the smolt outmigration collection and enumeration
occurring in the spring 2018, this information will be compiled with previous year’s data and added to
the data set for use in the nerkid model. The nerkid model will be updated as data is collected. Updates
from the progress of the CSAS review will be included in the final reporting but final results from the
review are not anticipated until summer 2018. Information collected from the Kokanee spawning
habitat assessment study will be included in the final report as will be a calculation of the total area of
habitat available which will be evaluated in the context of determining if habitat capacity is limiting in
the reservoir. The spawning behavior, as informed by the fall and winter gillnets will be summarized in
the final reporting, as will broodstock collection data. The project lead identified in each task of the plan
will be responsible for completion of their respective section of the summary report. Each project lead
must report on the activities completed and will summarize findings for inclusion in a larger report
during the fall/winter of 2018.
Permits and Approvals Section
Will the proposed project occur on BC Hydro-owned land?
No/partial
Is project site in close proximity to BC Hydro-owned facilities?
Yes
List Landowners
Landowner/Stakeholder Name, communication has taken place
9
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Fish Passage Feasibility – Year 2 – Proposal – COA-F19-F-2683
List required permits and approvals
(1) Land Use agreement for Allco Fish Hatchery, Fraser Regional Corrections, Province of British
Columbia.
(2) Land Use agreement for Alouette Sockeye Hatchery - Fraser Regional Corrections, Province of BC
(3) Regional Production Plan License to take eggs - License from DFO to take and hold up to 30K
eggs for Sockeye
(4) FLNRO Scientific Fish Collection Permit - Permission must be granted to collect fish for scientific
purposes from non-tidal waters (Wildlife Act & Angling and Scientific Regulations).
(5) DFO / FLNRO Introduction and Transfer Permit - An authorization concerning the movement of
live fish in British Columbia must be granted to transport any fish.
(6) DFO Fish Sampling Permit - Permission must be granted to collect the specified species and
(7) quantity for scientific purposes.
(8) DFO Species at Risk Act (SARA) Permit - Permission must be granted to carry out an activity that
is incidentally affecting SARA species (Nooksack Dace & Salish Sucker).
(9) MOE BC Parks Use Parks Use Permission - BC Parks support is required to conduct a research
project within Golden Ears Park
NOTE PERMITS (2) and (3) WILL NOT BE NEEDED FOR THIS FWCP FUNDING APPLICATION BUT REMAIN
HERE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY.
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Fish Passage Feasibility – Year 2 – Proposal – COA-F19-F-2683
In-kind contributions from:
• Katzie First Nation
• Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO)
• Ministry of Environment (MOE)
• Alouette River Management Society (ARMS)
• BC Corrections-Allco Fish Hatchery
• BC Hydro
• LGL Limited
Past Related Projects:
• Alouette Reservoir Fish Passage Feasibility - 03.AL.03 (ARMS)
• Field Trials to Assess Coho Smolt Migration Success - 05.AL.02 (LGL)
• Field Trials to Assess Steelhead Smolt Migration Success Through the Alouette Reservoir, 2006-
06.AL.02 (LGL)
• Evaluation of the Migration Success of O. nerka (Kokanee / Sockeye) from the Alouette
Reservoir, 2007 – 07.ALU.01 (LGL)
• Tretheway Spawning and Rearing Channel, 2007 – 07.ALU.02 (ARMS)
• Stewart Pond Restoration, 2009 – 09.ALU.02 (ARMS)
• Alouette River 232nd Street Channel, Maple Ridge, B.C., 2011 – 11.ALU.02 (ARMS)
• Coniagas Channel, Maple Ridge, B.C., 2012 – 12.ALU.04 (ARMS)
• Evaluation of the Migration Success of O. nerka (Kokanee / Sockeye) from the Alouette
Reservoir – ALUMON#2 from 2008 to 2014 (LGL)
• Alouette Adult Sockeye Enumeration Monitor – ALUMON #4 from 2008 to 2014 (funded by BC
Hydro’s Alouette Water Use Plan)
• Evaluation of the Migration Success of O. nerka (Kokanee / Sockeye) from the Alouette
Reservoir, 2015 -16.ALU.01 (LGL)
• Alouette Adult Sockeye Enumeration Monitor – Bridging Year 2015
• Alouette Adult Sockeye Enumeration Monitor – Bridging Year 2016
• Technical Feasibility and Recommendations For Alouette Lake Sockeye Salmon Re-establishment
Above The Alouette Dam - Prepared by: E.M. Plate, M.A. Mathews and R.C. Bocking, LGL
Limited Environmental Research Associates - 2014
Project Coordinators:
• Greta Borick-Cunningham (ARMS), Sophie Smith (ARMS)
• Dr. Daniel T. Selbie (DFO)
• Brett van Poorten, Shannon Harris, Allison Hebert (MOE)
• Dr. Lyse Godbout (DFO Pacific Biological Station)
• Ronald MacLean and Michael Ilaender (BC Corrections)
• Dave Nanson and Scott Ducharme (DFO Oceans, Habitat and Enhancement, Community Advisor)
• Megan Mathews and Bob Bocking (LGL Limited)
Alouette Watershed Sockeye – Fish Passage Feasibility – Year 2 – Proposal – COA-F19-F-2683
Literature Cited
Alouette River Watershed Action Plan – Final, September 2017. Prepared by BC Hydro
Alouette Watershed Plan – draft, October 2011. Prepared by BC Hydro
Alouette Watershed Salmonid Action Plan – final, October 2011. Prepared by BC Hydro
Crowston, A. 2012. Alouette Adult Sockeye Enumeration 2011 (report) Prepared for BC Hydro in 2012
Harris, S., Hebert, A., (Ministry of Environment) and Wilson, B. (BC Hydro). 2017 unpublished summary.
NSS_2017-10-06-FWCP Interim Summary, FWCP Project COA-F18-F-2385. Task 2 – Assessment of
Reservoir Spawning Habitat & Onchorhynchus nerka Reproductive Behaviour.
Godbout, L., Wood, C.C., Withler, R.E., Latham, S., Nelson, R.J., Wetzel, L., Barnett-Johnson, R., Grove,
M.J., Schmitt, A.K., and McKeegan, K.D. 2011. Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) return after
an absence of nearly 90 years: a case of reversion to anadromy. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 68(9):
1590-1602.
Godbout, L, C. C. Wood, R. Withler, D. Menard, and A. Ogden. 2013. Assessment of smolt production
from anadromous O. nerka transferred into the Alouette Reservoir: Brood years 2008-2010. FWCP
Report 54 p.
M.A. Mathews, J. J. Smith, and R. C. Bocking (LGL Limited) 2014. Evaluation of the Migration Success of
O.nerka (Kokanee/Sockeye) from the Alouette Reservoir. Report prepared for BC Hydro WUP
study ALUMON 2. 2014.
Plate, E.M., Mathews, M.A., and Bocking, R.C. (LGL Limited). Technical Feasibility and Recommendations
for Alouette Lake Sockeye Salmon Re-Establishment Above the Alouette Dam. October 2014.
Prepared for BC Hydro Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program.
Smith, S and G. Borick-Cunningham (ARMS). 2016. Experimental Release of Hatchery Reared Sea-Run
Kokanee into Alouette Reservoir to Evaluate the Feasibility of Re-establishing Sockeye Salmon Run
–2015. Final Report prepared for BC Hydro’s FWCP – Coastal.
Smith, Jason J. (LGL Limited) 2017. Unpublished summary. Alouette_Katzie-LGL_2017 Narrative Interim
report.
van Poorten, B.T., S. Harris, A. Hebert. In review. Sockeye recovery projections for a highly managed
mixed kokanee-sockeye system. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2017
1000 Bylaws
1000
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7196-2015
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7196-2015."
2.Those parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 District Lot 247 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 6664
Lot 2 District Lot 247 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 6664
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1653 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to C-2 (Community Commercial).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 8th day of March, 2016.
READ a second time the 19th day of September, 2017.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of October, 2017.
READ a third time the day of , 20
APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of , 20
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1001
11653
11742
21640216372164621668216842169521736217592177411670217851175021800 2179511737
11748
11728
1175421807
11685
11666
11722
11858
21621216852171021756217352176911741
11712 218062181811723
11731
11875
11882
216492167421701217112173021723217452175911729 217952180511683
11709
11690
11772
11861 216552169821784217712180011829
11691
11708
218412184811677
11691
11718/20 2166721710217282175521768217642177111753
11738
1176221787
218012183011863
11873
1174721842 1176221810
11703
11652/54
11748
21626216502167721674216922171621715/1921732217442174611696
1172621796 11851
11699 21808218142180311662
11663
1188511881
11680
11754
11868
216262162311714/16 216622167521720217132172121733217312174721742217502177311713
11706
11841
11717
11767
11721 11720
11738
11688 21656216652169421699217312170721741217682177811707
21783218082182111757
11702218 ST.CARR ST.117 AVE.117 AVE.
HOWISON AVE.218 ST.117 AVE.
LOUGHEED HWY.
DOVER RD.
DE1/2
238
"B"
226 228 229
79
276
234
89
186 P 3331113
8
B
B
Rem 3
P 64655
"A"
D
221 220
1
74 80
77 85
3
232
87
241
1
236 237
2 EP 1025118P 1720514
7
C
6
5
2
*LMP 34333
P 87322159
LMP 22030
225
70
2
LP 77304
217
P 32510
278
233
A P 8409
123
118
149
4
7
125 126
P 38052
N 50' of 3
5
163 164
P 7433B
P 11112
224
P 32510P 32510
219
76
83
P 35974
2
235
242
185
17
122
15P 1238611
9
119
7P 76203
P 13429
158
324
P 13429 W1/2
P 11112
223
6
P 8950
218
84
2
P 6664
192
279P 38855244
213
P 15184
187
Rem
121
P 13839P 131616
A
124
P 32876
1
LP 59245
2 P 792066
160 161
Rem
73
227
P 61812
230 231
216
88
277
275
90
211
P 12386150
2
3 P 13839P 13161*PP067P 13161
151
LMP 12706
LMP 12706
162
P 32876
P 79206
(P 84920)
P 1007
222
NWS 18481
81
P 36099
82
P 32510
78 P 35428214
243
*PP066
240
189
C P 13876P 4451812
10
124
5
148
LMS 3673
3
P 30039
P 5046
P 36904
2
*C
Rem
71
P 7795575
P 6664
319
P 32510
*PP075
P 12044
B
188
P 35974B
210
16
P 17205
120
1
3
4
EP 75514
43175
EP 36356
EP 77957P 56604RP 30988
43175 52239EP 77956BCP49047BCP48915
RP 76202
BCP
EP 36421
RP 84920
RP 74552
BCPBCP
LOUGHEED
H
W
Y
.216 ST.SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
C-2 (Community Commercial)
7196-20151653
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7249-2016
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7249-2016."
2. That PART 6, RESIDENTIAL ZONES, SECTION 601, (C) REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE,
SHAPE AND SITING OF BUILDING AND STRUCTURES, item 4) Buildings and Structures
for Two Family Residential Use in the RT-1 Zone is amended by deleting item (d) and
replacing it with the following:
(d) shall not be permitted on a lot less than 750 m².
(e) notwithstanding item (d) above, lots located within the Town Centre, as
identified on Schedule H, which are either a corner lot or provided with
lane access, shall not be permitted on a lot less than 557 m².
3.To Amend Schedule “D” MINIMUM LOT AREA AND DIMENSIONS by the modification
of the following line as follows:
RT-1 20 m 27m 750 m² See item 7 below
4.To Amend Schedule “D” MINIMUM LOT AREA AND DIMENSIONS after item 6:
7. For lots located within the Town Centre, as identified on Schedule H, which are
either a corner lot or provided with lane access, shall not be less than 557 m².
5. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 224 District Lot 249 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 44587
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1677 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RT-1 (Two Family Urban
Residential).
1002
6. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 14th day of June, 2016.
READ a second time the 19th day of September, 2017.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of October, 2017.
READ a third time the day of , 20
APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of
, 20
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
FRASERVIEW ST.BERRY AVE.212 ST.116 AVE.
R IV E R R O A D
212 ST.RIVER WYNDE D G E D A L E A V E .211 ST.RIVER WYNDFRASERVIEW ST.2108811618
211101151821109
11468
11610
1159521108 11596
2107011606
11606
11628
2107711594
11609
11640
11615
11633
11641
11512
11575
11617
1 1 5 2 721058
1148421090115102110521111
11495115222110611690 2121111671
1155021137
2110721157210732114711515
11532
11642
114962118021158
1 1 4 8 1
115282107421112
114902108221169 11585
2109711629
11515
11584
11584
11525
11608
11628
2106811618
11551
11645
115082108311657
11625
210782120211537
1 1 5 6 3
11608
11585
2106011603
1155921102 11546
11633
11618
2106711591
21057211012119011616
1150221108
210592106711487
11605
11484
11501210821152221100211312114411567
11527
11587
11567
210871 1 4 9 1 2113811619
21092211112104021107211992110511601
1162821099 116171160921119
115012111611494
11685
115592110311580
211042109511624
11639 11632
11624
11601
11480
11610
2110211593
2109867
129
65 10
154
199
165
221
156
13
200
2
189
18
158
54
9
72
163
B Rem Pcl A73
204
12
210
34
7
13
205
1
58
192
81
195
43 Rem B178
2
1
164
152 1
206
57
82
3
9
35
8
201
191
203
133
11
160
223
2
10
224
25
42
222
193
2
135
A
1
220
190
159
C
B
11
79
1
155
5
196
140
55
62
131
346
141
6
2
37
12
161 1
162 5
153
A
REM.
130132
6
2
8
2
319
64
202
68
3
A
80
198
4
188197
41
157
1 66
26
194
4036
4
166
1
211
1
7
2
2
63 Rem 7
1156
6
134
7 10
151
P 41783
P 45596LMP 3838P 14425P 42541
P 21754P 43564P 14493P 11238 P 43564P 40804LMS 1692
P 28112 P 43564EP 17246P 42541P 43564P 39498 LMP 12576P 42541
P 27978
P 44587P 42541 P 43564P 21754
P 44587
P 44555LMP 16445P 35527 EPP 36400RP8369P 42541P 33537
P 28078LMP 434P 75991P 21754P 40804P 85133 BCP 16066P 19121P 82848P 24973
P 43584P 73040*PP057
P 9773P 40804P 14493P 41783
L M P 2 8 4 8 4
EP 28014
E P 5 4 5 1 9
EP 23001LMP 29183E
P
4
6
8
6
6
E P 5 4 5 1 9EPP 36637EP 27702RW 42542L M P 2 9 1 0 1EPP 3 6 4 3 1
R IV E R R O A D
´
SCALE 1:2,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential)
7249-20161677
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7239-2016
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7239-2016."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 56 Section 22 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 43885
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1673 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 26th day of April, 2016.
READ a second time the 19th day of September, 2017.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of October, 2017.
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1003
243 ST.125 AVE.
124 AVE.241812415524107241502434112580
24190242802416012525
24331242092420512561
2432524177241372419512552
2424024328243082418912581
2430724173241802426524311242212427148
1
1
CP
1
8
2
54
Rem part
(
1
.
5
0
2
A
c
r
e
s
)
62
N 190' 12
A
55
65
B
2
1
Rem 64
1
2
66
56
2
1
Rem 1
B
3
1
2
1
3
7
532
2
83
2
A
2
1
2
1 1
EPP 47315
P 70798
BCP 47502
P 43885
BCP 48079
BCP 28230
P 72259LMP 12744
P 86522LMS
3755LMS 3755P 43885
LMP 123
EPP 37336 EPP 47315
P 43885
P 86522
BCP 46690P 73144P 69960P 43885P 3118
BCP 4
8
0
8
0EP 56822
BCP 28231LMP 39898EP 54608LMP 6920EPP 47314
LMP 12745
6.0
EPP 43256EPP 43256EPP 43256
125 AVE.
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
7239-20161673
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7381-2017
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014
_______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan,
Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan, and Schedule “C” of the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7381-2017
2.Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan, Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan is hereby
amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
South 150 Feet Lot 1 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 17613;
Lot 1 Except: South 150 Feet Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan
17613;
Parcel “B” (Reference Plan 5589) Lot 9 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster
District Plan 809;
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 953, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended as shown.
3.Schedule “C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
South 150 Feet Lot 1 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 17613;
Lot 1 Except: South 150 Feet Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan
17613;
Parcel “B” (Reference Plan 5589) Lot 9 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster
District Plan 809;
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 954, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adjusting the Conservation boundary.
1004.1
4.Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 19th day of September, 2017.
READ a second time the 19th day of September, 2017.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of October, 2017.
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED the day of ,20 .
___________________________________ _____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
111A AVE.
112 AVE.KANAKA WAY 112 AVE.241A ST
.240 ST.239A ST.112 AVE.
11146
11137
11189
239322393611121
11157
11107
11181
11183
2392211125
111052390723915
110802395311115
11097
11195
11052
11117
111552395023906
11121
11108
11126 11133
11156
1111923912
11106
11111
110622395823902 11145
1115923942
11130
11103 2398011110
11038
11136
11132
11127
11163
11103
11116
11118/54
11113
11109
1114523945
11135
11124
11177 11175
11151
11167 2413311187
11163
11115
11118
111022396223925 1116923928
1118423916
11120
11225
11166
11102 2393511109
11173
1113311127
11112
11139
11091
11250
11129
A
7
5
19
57 Rem 1
26
28
40
1
16
37
60
2
Rem 1
3
14
10
29
B24
13
35
27
3
20
51
58
12
26
39
4
27
45
50
42 4
9
1
N 1/2 of 4
32
47
17
23
36
PARK
53
15
56
54
33
A
3
46
6
43
6
2
28
25
5
17
48
38
21
S 150' of 1
59
8
44
16
1561
49
10
55
3
11
18
1314
31
22
12
8
7
34
52
18
6
41
30
9
11
2
P 3452
P 17613
EPP 25279
P 17613
NWP5589
EPP 70379
EPP 32520(EPS 2572)EPP 32520P 43223BCP 46902
EPP 32520
P 17613
RP 13033
EPP 70566EPP 32520EPP 45971EPP 71011
EPP 32537
EPP 32519EPP 32537
EPP 36439
EPP 40843EPP 40982EPP 45971EPP 37716EPP 40844
EPP 45971 EPP 32519EPP 40843
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose:From:
To:
To Amend Albion Area Plan Schedule 1Neighbourhood Commercial, Medium Density Residential and ConservationVillage Commmercial Medium Density ResidentialConservation
7381-2017953
111A AVE.
112 AVE.KANAKA WAY 112 AVE.241A ST
.240 ST.239A ST.112 AVE.
11146
11137
11189
239322393611121
11157
11107
11181
11183
2392211125
111052390723915
110802395311115
11097
11195
11052
11117
111552395023906
11121
11108
11126 11133
11156
1111923912
11106
11111
110622395823902 11145
1115923942
11130
11103 2398011110
11038
11136
11132
11127
11163
11103
11116
11118/54
11113
11109
1114523945
11135
11124
11177 11175
11151
11167 2413311187
11163
11115
11118
111022396223925 1116923928
1118423916
11120
11225
11166
11102 2393511109
11173
1113311127
11112
11139
11091
11250
11129
A
7
5
19
57 Rem 1
26
28
40
1
16
37
60
2
Rem 1
3
14
10
29
B24
13
35
27
3
20
51
58
12
26
39
4
27
45
50
42 4
9
1
N 1/2 of 4
32
47
17
23
36
PARK
53
15
56
54
33
A
3
46
6
43
6
2
28
25
5
17
48
38
21
S 150' of 1
59
8
44
16
1561
49
10
55
3
11
18
1314
31
22
12
8
7
34
52
18
6
41
30
9
11
2
P 3452
P 17613
EPP 25279
P 17613
NWP5589
EPP 70379
EPP 32520(EPS 2572)EPP 32520P 43223BCP 46902
EPP 32520
P 17613
RP 13033
EPP 70566EPP 32520EPP 45971EPP 71011
EPP 32537
EPP 32519EPP 32537
EPP 36439
EPP 40843EPP 40982EPP 45971EPP 37716EPP 40844
EPP 45971 EPP 32519EPP 40843
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose:To Amend Schedule C as shown
Remove from Conservation Add to Conservation
7381-2017954
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7276-2016
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7276-2016."
2.Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
South 150 Feet Lot 1 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 17613;
Lot 1 Except: South 150 Feet Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan
17613;
Parcel “B” (Reference Plan 5589) Lot 9 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster
District Plan 809;
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1694 a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential), C-5
(Village Centre Commercial).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto
are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 6th day of September, 2016.
READ a second time the 19th day of September, 2017.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of October, 2017.
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1004.2
111A AVE.
112 AVE.KANAKA WAY 112 AVE.241A ST.240 ST.239A ST.112 AVE.
11146
11137
11189
239322393611121
11157
11107
11181
11183
2392211125
111052390723915
110802395311115
11097
11195
11052
11117
111552395023906
11121
11108
11126 11133
11156
1111923912
11106
11111
110622395823902 11145
1115923942
11130
11103 2398011110
11038
11136
11132
11127
11163
11103
11116
11118/54
11113
11109
1114523945
11135
11124
11177 11175
11151
11167 2413311187
11163
11115
11118
111022396223925 1116923928
1118423916
11120
11225
11166
11102 2393511109
11173
1113311127
11112
11139
11091
11250
11129
A
7
5
19
57 Rem 1
26
28
40
1
16
37
60
2
Rem 1
3
14
10
29
B24
13
35
27
3
20
51
58
12
26
39
4
27
45
50
42 4
9
1
N 1/2 of 4
32
47
17
23
36
PARK
53
15
56
54
33
A
3
46
6
43
6
2
28
25
5
17
48
38
21
S 150' of 1
59
8
44
16
1561
49
10
55
3
11
18
1314
31
22
12
8
7
34
52
18
6
41
30
9
11
2
P 3452
P 17613
EPP 25279
P 17613
NWP5589
EPP 70379
EPP 32520(EPS 2572)EPP 32520P 43223BCP 46902
EPP 32520
P 17613
RP 13033
EPP 70566EPP 32520EPP 45971EPP 71011
EPP 32537
EPP 32519EPP 32537
EPP 36439
EPP 40843EPP 40982EPP 45971EPP 37716EPP 40844
EPP 45971 EPP 32519EPP 40843
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)C-5 (Village Centre Commercial)
7276-20161694
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2013-086-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Final Reading
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7160-2015
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013
13704 232 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7160-2015 and Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013
for the subject property, located at 13704 232 Street (previously 23262 Silver Valley Road, 13738,
13702, and 13660 232 Street, which have been recently consolidated) have been considered by
Council and at Public Hearing and subsequently were granted third reading. The applicant has
requested that final reading be granted.
The application has been revised in accordance with Provincial regulations to provide additional
riparian area for the relocated watercourse. The density has been reduced from the proposal that
had received third reading from: 51 single family lots; 16 street townhouse lots; one commercial lot;
and a neighbourhood park, to: 42 single family lots; 16 street townhouse lots; one commercial lot;
and a neighbourhood park. Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7160-2015 and Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013 have been amended to reflect the amended proposed land use
designation boundaries and refer to the new legal desciption of the consolidated properties,
referencing the legal plan that subdivided off the road dedication and the neighbourhood park that
was recently purchased by the City.
Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013 and considered the early
consultation requirements for the Official Community Plan amendment on October 22, 2013.
Second reading was granted on October 27, 2015. This application was presented at Public Hearing
on November 17, 2015, and Council granted third reading on November 24, 2015.
The Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999 was amended on November 15, 2016 to allow
18 months at third reading, with the potential to extend third reading an additional 6 months, at the
discretion of the Director of Planning. A 6 month extension was granted to allow the applicant until
November 24, 2017 to complete the conditions for final reading.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1.That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7160-2015, as amended in this report, be
adopted; and
2.That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013, as amended in this report, be adopted.
1005
-2 -
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Council considered this rezoning application at a Public Hearing held on November 17, 2015. On
November 24, 2015 Council granted third reading to Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No.
7160-2015 and Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013, with the stipulation that the following
conditions be addressed:
i)Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the
deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;
ii)Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule “A”, Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver
Valley, Figure 2 - Land Use Plan, Figure 3A - Blaney Hamlet, and Figure 4 - Trails / Open
Space,
iii)Road dedication on 232 Street and Silver Valley Road as required;
iv) Park dedication as required, including construction of multi-purpose trails; and removal of
all debris and garbage from park land;
v)Purchase of the land identified for future neighbourhood park by the City of Maple Ridge;
vi) Consolidation of the subject properties;
vii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the geotechnical report, which addresses the
suitability of the subject properties for the proposed development and confirms that the
slope failure area has been remediated;
viii) Removal of existing buildings;
ix)Approval from the Ministry of Forest, Lands and Natural Resources for in-stream works on
the site;
x)In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional
Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the
subject properties. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the
subject property is not a contaminated site.
xi)Registration of a Housing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant to ensure two residential
units in the proposed commercial building remain as rental units;
xii)Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the visitor parking and residential parking
for the commercial building;
xiii)Provision of a voluntary Community Amenity Contribution of $3,100.00 for each residential
lot created; and
xiv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant limiting the use of Commercial Unit 1 and the
adjacent outdoor play space, a total of 106.2 m2 of indoor floor area and 93 m2 of outdoor
space, to a commercial daycare use in perpetuity.
-3 -
The following applies to the above:
i)The signed Rezoning Servicing Agreement has been provided as a Restrictive Covenant
and the security deposit has been received, a Letter of Undertaking has been provided to
ensure registration with the Land Titles Office;
ii)Official Community Plan Schedule “A”, Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley, Figure 2 -
Land Use Plan, Figure 3A - Blaney Hamlet, and Figure 4 - Trails / Open Space;” will be
amended with final approval of these bylaws;
iii)Road dedication on 232 Street and Silver Valley Road has been provided;
iv) Park dedication has been provided, including the plans for the construction of the multi-
purpose trails; and removal of all debris and garbage from park land has occurred;
v)The land identified for future neighbourhood park has ben purchased by the City of Maple
Ridge;
vi) The properties have been consolidated;
vii) A signed Restrictive Covenant for the geotechnical report has been provided and a Letter of
Undertaking has been provided to ensure registration with the Land Titles Office, and
confirmation that the slope failure area has been remediated has been received;
viii) The existing buildings have been removed;
ix)The Ministry of Forest, Lands and Natural Resources has approved the in-stream works on
the site;
x)A disclosure statement has been submitted by a Professional Engineer advising that there
is no evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the subject properties;
xi)A signed Restrictive Covenant for the Housing Agreement has been provided and a Letter
of Undertaking has been provided to ensure registration with the Land Titles Office, to
ensure two residential units in the proposed commercial building remain as rental units;
xii)A signed Restrictive Covenant for protecting the visitor parking and residential parking for
the commercial building has been provided and a Letter of Undertaking has been provided
to ensure registration with the Land Titles Office;
xiii)A voluntary Community Amenity Contribution of $3,100.00 for each residential lot created
has been provided; and
xiv) A signed Restrictive Covenant limiting the use of Commercial Unit 1 and the adjacent
outdoor play space, a total of 106.2 m2 of indoor floor area and 93 m2 of outdoor space, to
a commercial daycare use in perpetuity has been provided and a Letter of Undertaking has
been provided to ensure registration with the Land Titles Office.
- 4 -
b) Additional Information:
The application has been revised in accordance with Provincial regulations to provide additional
riparian area for the relocated watercourse. The density has been reduced from the proposal that
had received third reading from: 51 single family lots; 16 street townhouse lots; one commercial lot;
and a neighbourhood park, to: 42 single family lots; 16 street townhouse lots; one commercial lot;
and a neighbourhood park. Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7160-2015 and Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013 have been amended to reflect the amended proposed land use
designation boundaries and refer to the new legal desciption of the consolidated properties,
referencing the legal plan that subdivided off the road dedication and the neighbourhood park that
was recently purchased by the City.
A 6 month extension was granted on May 16, 2017, to allow the applicant until November 24, 2017
to complete the conditions for final reading. The application had to be revised to reduce the density
to satisfy the provincial requirements for provision of riparian area. This provincial approval resulted
in delays to the application beyond the applicant’s control.
A Commercial Development Permit, Multi Family Development Permit, Intensive Residential
Development Permit, Wildfire Permit, and Development Variance Permit which accompany this
application will be the subject of future reports to Council for approval. The related Housing
Agreement Bylaw No. 7295-2016 and Local Area Servicing Bylaw No. 7393-2017 are going for final
reading on October 24, 2017.
CONCLUSION:
As the applicant has met Council’s conditions, it is recommended that final reading be given to
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7160-2015, as amended in this report, and Zone
Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013, as amended in this report.
“Original signed by Michelle Baski”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AscT, MA
Planner 1
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng.
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7160-2015
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013
Appendix D – Site Plan
DATE: Sep 22, 2017
FILE: 2013-086-RZ
1370 232 STREET
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,500 BY: PC
Legend
Stream
Ditch Centreline
Edge of River
Indefinite Creek
River Centreline
Lake or Reservoir
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX A
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7160-2015
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014
___________________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official
Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule "A" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7160-2015."
2.Schedule "A" Chapter 10.3, Section 5.3 Hamlets, Subsection 5.3.3 Specific Hamlets, is
amended in the following way:
i.Item a) Blaney Hamlet, sub item ii) is amended by replacing the last sentence with the
following: “The centre should also include a small commercial area that is typically
between 90-140 m2”
ii.Item b) Forest Hamlet, sub item ii) is amended by replacing the last sentence with the
following: “The centre should also include a small commercial area that is typically
between 90-140 m2”
iii.Item c) Horse Hamlet, sub item iii) is amended by replacing the last sentence with the
following: “The centre should also include a small commercial area that is typically
between 90-140 m2”
3.Schedule "A" Chapter 10.3, Section 5.3 Hamlets, Subsection 5.3.5 Commercial Areas, items
c) and d) are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:
c) The commercial floor space in the Blaney Hamlet is typically between 90 - 140 m2.
d) The commercial floor space in the Forest Hamlet centre is typically between 90-140 m2.
4.Schedule "A" Chapter 10.3, Section 7.0 Design Guidelines, Subsection 7.2 Design
Guidelines for Hamlets, Sub section 7.2.1 Uses, item e) is deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:
e)Parking for commercial uses in Hamlets may be accommodated on the street.
Onsite parking for commercial uses must be located to the rear of the building.
5.Schedule "A" Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley, Figure 2 - Land Use Plan and Figure 3A -
Blaney Hamlet is hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known
and described as:
APPENDIX B
1005.1
Lot 1 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP60071
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 910, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby re-designated to as shown.
6.Schedule "A" Chapter 10.3, Part VI, A – Silver Valley, and Figure 4 - Trails / Open Space, is
hereby amended for those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP60071
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 911, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this bylaw, are hereby designated as shown.
7.Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ A FIRST TIME the 27th day of October, 2015.
READ A SECOND TI ME the 27th day of October, 2015.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the 17th day of November, 2015.
READ A THIRD TIME the 24th day of November, 2015.
ADOPTED the day of , 20 .
_____________________________________ _____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
12
40
59
14
13
2
58
8
2
A
2
60
7
19
9
Rem 1
10
53
6
17
6
PARK
1
15 4
3
15
PARK
N 200' 9
54
61
6
S PART 9
8
5
7
4
Rem 6
7
21
3
8
6
11
7
PARK
10
1
PARK
12
PARK
12
52
4
9
1 1118
A
16
9
3
2
PARK
5557
8
PARK
13
2
14
5
A
Rem Pcl B56
4
B
Rem 5
6
62
5
20
P 20132
RP 17234
EPP 44846 BCP 42873EPP 34552
P 2409
RP 17267
P 18410
RP 10274
BCP 42823
BCP 48060EPP 34552BCP 43235 EPP 34551BCP 46698BCP 42873EP 4248
P 2409BCP 46658EPP 29463P 11173
BCS 3895
*PP162
P 20132
BCP 41713
BCS 3588
P 40424
232 ST.´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose:
7160-2015910To Amend Figure 2 (Land Use Plan) and 3A (Blaney Hamlet) of the Silver Valley Area Plan as shown CommercialOpen SpaceNeighbourhood ParkConservation
Low Density UrbanLow/Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium/High Density Residential
12
40
59
14
13
2
58
8
2
A
2
60
7
19
9
Rem 1
10
53
6
17
6
PARK
1
15 4
3
15
PARK
N 200' 9
54
61
6
S PART 9
8
5
7
4
Rem 6
7
21
3
8
6
11
7
PARK
10
1
PARK
12
PARK
12
52
4
9
1 1118
A
16
9
3
2
PARK
5557
8
PARK
13
2
14
5
A
Rem Pcl B56
4
B
Rem 5
6
62
5
20
P 20132
RP 17234
EPP 44846 BCP 42873EPP 34552
P 2409
RP 17267
P 18410
RP 10274
BCP 42823
BCP 48060EPP 34552BCP 43235 EPP 34551BCP 46698BCP 42873EP 4248
P 2409BCP 46658EPP 29463P 11173
BCS 3895
*PP162
P 20132
BCP 41713
BCS 3588
P 40424
232 ST.´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose:
7160-2015911Amend Figure 4 (Trails/Open Space) of the Silver Valley Area Plan as shown
Add Open SpaceAdd Neighbourhood ParkAdd ConservationAdd Equestrian Trail
Remove Open SpaceRemove Neighbourhood Park
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7023-2013
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part
of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -
1985 as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7023-2013."
2.Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP60071
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1595 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential), RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), R-1
(Residential District), R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District), RST-SV (Street
Townhouse-Silver Valley), C-5 (Village Centre Commercial), and P-1 (Park and School)
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 22nd day of October, 2013.
READ a second time the 27th day of October, 2015.
PUBLIC HEARING held the 17th day of November, 2015.
READ a third time the 24th day of November, 2015.
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
1005.2
12
40
59
14
13
2
58
8
2
A
2
60
7
19
9
Rem 1
10
53
6
17
6
PARK
1
15 4
3
15
PARK
N 200' 9
54
61
6
S PART 9
8
5
7
4
Rem 6
7
21
3
8
6
11
7
PARK
10
1
PARK
12
PARK
12
52
4
9
1 1118
A
16
9
3
2
PARK
5557
8
PARK
13
2
14
5
A
Rem Pcl B56
4
B
Rem 5
6
62
5
20
P 20132
RP 17234
EPP 44846 BCP 42873EPP 34552
P 2409
RP 17267
P 18410
RP 10274
BCP 42823
BCP 48060EPP 34552BCP 43235 EPP 34551BCP 46698BCP 42873EP 4248
P 2409BCP 46658EPP 29463P 11173
BCS 3895
*PP162
P 20132
BCP 41713
BCS 3588
P 40424
232 ST.´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From: To:RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
7023-20131595
P-1 (Park and School)R-1 (Residential District)C-5 (Village Centre Commercial)
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)RST-SV (Street Townhouse - Silver Valley)RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
APPENDIX D
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7295-2016
A Bylaw to authorize the City of Maple Ridge to enter into a Housing Agreement for 13704 232 Street
WHEREAS pursuant to Section 483 of the Local Government Act, R.S.B.C 1996, c. 323, as
amended, Council may, by bylaw, enter into a housing agreement under that Section;
AND WHEREAS Council and SV 232 STREET DEVELOPMENTS LTD. wishes to enter into a housing
agreement for the subject property at 13704 232 Street;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the City of Maple Ridge, in open
meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as “13704 232 Street Housing Agreement Bylaw No. 7295-2016”.
2.By this Bylaw Council authorizes the District to enter into a housing agreement with SV 232
STREET DEVELOPMENTS LTD., in respect to the following land:
Lot 1 Section 33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP60071
3.The Mayor and Corporate Officer are authorized to execute the housing agreement and all
incidental instruments on behalf of the City of Maple Ridge.
4.Schedule A, attached to this Bylaw, is incorporated into and forms part of this Bylaw.
5.This bylaw shall take effect as of the date of adoption hereof.
READ a first time the 10th day of October, 2017.
READ a second time the 10th day of October, 2017.
READ a third time the 10th day of October, 2017.
ADOPTED the day of , 2017 .
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1005.3
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7393-2017
A Bylaw to authorize a municipal service to maintain enhanced landscape areas;
to define the benefitting lands; and to establish that the cost of the municipal service shall
be borne by the owners of real property within such defined area.
WHEREAS, Council has been petitioned to provide a municipal service pursuant to Division 5, Section
210 of the Community Charter S.B.C. 2003, c.26 (the “Community Charter”);
AND WHEREAS the Corporate Officer has certified that the petition received for the municipal
services does constitute a sufficient and valid petition;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to proceed with the works;
AND WHEREAS the “Maple Ridge Local Area Service Policy”, as amended, provides that the cost of
providing a municipal service shall be recoverable from each of the existing parcels of land and all
future lots created by subdivision of the parcels, specifically:
Lot 1 Section33 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan EPP60071
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as “232A Street Local Area Service Bylaw No. 7393-2017”.
2.The contents of Schedules “A”, “B” “C” and “D” attached hereto are hereby declared to be
made an integral part of this Bylaw.
3.The Local Area Service of the City for the benefit of which the enhanced landscape areas are
to be maintained as a municipal service are defined as the hatched areas on the attached
Schedule “A”.
4.The recommended procedures and frequencies for maintenance and Annual Charges are
described on the attached Schedule “B”.
5.The Enhanced Landscape area planting plans “Layout and Planting Site Plan, Enlargement
Plan, Enlargement Plan and Plant List, Sections, and Details Planting, and LAS Plan”
prepared by Connect Landscape Architecture are attached as Schedule “C”.
6.The Stormwater Management engineering drawings: Onsite Stormwater Management Plan;
Offsite Stormwater Management Plan; and 232A Storm and Sanitary, by Omega and
Associates Engineering Ltd. are attached as Schedule “D”.
7.This bylaw shall take effect as of the date of adoption hereof.
READ a first time the 10th day of October, 2017.
READ a second time the 10th day of October, 2017.
READ a third time the 10th day of October, 2017.
ADOPTED the day of , 2017.
____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER 1006
SILVER VALLEY RD232 ST.137
A
V
E
.232 ST.BLANEY RD232A ST.
13781
13762
13773
13802
13747
13783
13765
13805
232882325013792 13795
13831 13822
13753
13795
1
3
7
5
1
13793 1382813825
1375013752
13762
13616
13772
13782
13602 (PUMP STATION)
13746
13762
137
5
7
13772
13796
2
3
2
8
0
13771
13782
231832
3
1
6
0
13776
13782
13811 13812
13743232722
3
1
6
6
13802
13763
12
14
138
58
2
7
19
PARK
9
10
53
6
17
PARK
1
PARK
15
PARK
4
3
15
54
6
PARK
PARK
S PART 9
5
7
2
11 PARK
10
1
12
4
1 1118
16
9
3
2
55
8
57
13
2
14
2
56
4
1
Rem 5
A
20
EPP 44846 BCP 42873EPP 34552
RP 10274
EPP 60071
BCP 42823
EPP 60071 EPP 34552BCP 43235
EPP 34551
P 20132
EPP 60071 BCP 42873EPP 60071
P 2409
EPP 70286
P 11173
EPP 60071
BCP 41713
BCS 3588
P 40424
EP 79495
EPP 37092
BCP 42829
BCP 33248
RW
4
6
8
0
8 BCP 41108BCP 33245BCP 33246BCP 33247
BCP 42874
EPP 49148
BCP 33246
EPP 37092
EPP 35006
BCP 4
2
8
7
4
EPP 38125BCP 42876EPP 34551
232 ST.´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE LOCAL AREA SERVICE BYLAWBylaw No.
Enhanced Landscape Areas
Original Lot Boundary
7393-2017
"Schedule A"
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
LOCAL AREA SERVICE
BYLAW NO. 7393 - 2017
SCHEDULE “B”
Class of Work:
The establishment, maintenance and replacement of enhanced bioswales and riparian areas
indicated by bold outline on Schedule “A” are to be maintained as per the attached recommended
procedures and frequencies.
Annual Charge:
The Annual Charge is based on a per lot basis for each of the 63 lots created by subdivision of Lot 1,
Section 33, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan EPP60071, of $129.52 starting in 2021.
The charges established under this Bylaw shall be specifically charged against the parcels
benefitting from the work, payable by a per lot basis levied year by year.
The Annual Charge Adjustment:
The annual charge will be reviewed each year by the Parks and Operations Departments, and
adjusted accordingly to reflect any change in maintenance requirements or costs, and to reflect any
increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Vancouver, BC for the immediately preceding year, as
provided by Statistics Canada.
"Schedule C"
"Schedule D"
1100 Reports and Recommendations
1100
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-155-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: First Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7358-2017
21319 and 21333 Lougheed Highway
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject properties, located at 21319 and 21333
Lougheed Highway, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to
permit the development of a two-storey commercial building. This development proposal is in
compliance with the Official Community Plan. To proceed further with this application additional
information is required as outlined below. Pursuant to Council’s resolution, this application is not
subject to the Community Amenity Contribution Program.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1)That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7358-2017be given first reading; and
2)That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules C, D and E of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Bissky Architecture And Urban Design Inc.
Legal Descriptions: Lot 4 District Lot 248 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan
8043
Parcel “A” (Explanatory Plan 9614) Lot 5 District Lot 248 Group
1 New Westminster District Plan 8043
OCP:
Existing: Commercial
Zoning:
Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Proposed: C-2 (Community Commercial)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Cemetery
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Institutional and Conservation
1101
-2 -
South: Use: Ridge Meadows Hospital
Zone: P-6 (Civic Institutional) and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Institutional, Conservation, Urban Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Commercial
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Commercial
Existing Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: Commercial
Site Area: 1,692 m² (0.42 acres)
Access: Lougheed Highway
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
b)Site Characteristics:
The subject properties, located at 21319 and 21333 Lougheed Highway, are located on the north
side of Lougheed Highway, east of the intersection of Laity Street and Lougheed Highway (see
Appendices A and B). The subject properties are relatively flat with trees located on the western lot
and along the northern boundary of both properties. Both properties are currently vacant.
c)Project Description:
This application proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
to C-2 (Community Commercial) (see Appendix C) to permit the development of a two-storey building
comprised of a restaurant (GM Restaurant) on the ground floor and office space above. The
proposed gross floor area of the ground floor is approximately 434 m² (4,672 ft²) and the proposed
gross floor area of the second storey area is approximately 316 m² (3,402 ft²), for a total area of
approximately 750 m² (8,074 ft²) (see Appendix D).
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will
need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for
further development permits.
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The subject properties are designated Commercial in the OCP and fall within the General
Commercial category, due to their location along Lougheed Highway, within the Urban Area Boundary
and outside of the Town Centre. The objective of the General Commercial category as stated in the
OCP is to “respond to emerging market trends and shopping preferences and to permit greater
flexibility in the range of commercial uses”. The C-2 (Community Commercial) zone aligns with the
General Commercial designation.
-3 -
Housing Action Plan:
The Housing Action Plan commits the City to looking at residential rental units above Commercial
developments. A report from the Planning Department is on the work program and expected in late
2017 or early 2018. In the interim, Council have been addressing this matter on a case by case
basis. To date, Council have required residential units above some Commercial developments,
including Silver Valley Road and 232 Avenue, and 240 Street and 112 Avenue; however, Council
have waived this for other Commercial developments, including the medical building/Doctors office
on Lougheed Highway, just east of 216 Street, and the two Commercial developments located at
11951 240 Street (Tim Hortons) and 11939 240 Street. Should Council wish to have rental units
above Commercial at this location, it would be beneficial to note that at this time.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-1 (One Family Urban
Residential) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit the development of a restaurant on the
ground floor with office use above on the second storey. Any variations from the requirements of the
proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application.
The zoning requirements for the C-2 (Community Commercial) zone allow for a two storey height
(7.5m) building, provided that the second storey does not exceed 50% of the ground floor area. In
recent commercial projects, site specific variances have been supported to permit a full second
storey, provided that the developer creates rental housing units above the commercial units and
entered into a Housing Agreement, protecting the apartments as rental units in perpetuity.
Staff have had preliminary discussions with the applicant regarding providing rental units on the
second storey; however, the applicant is only looking for office use on the second storey at this time.
A Development Variance Permit will be required, as the second storey is proposed to be greater than
50% in area of the first floor.
As identified above, Council has, on occasion, permitted such variances to accommodate rental
housing above Commercial developments. While the subject application is proposing an office use
on the second storey, staff note the likely continued interest in non-residential uses along Lougheed
Highway, in light of the possible Rapid Bus implementation along Lougheed Highway and Council’s
interest in maximizing our employment lands. Subject to Council’s direction, staff will continue to
monitor such expressions of interest as they relate to development as a means of informing a
broader Lougheed Highway Corridor Study planned for 2018.
Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.5 of the OCP, a Commercial Development Permit application is required to
address the current proposal’s compatibility with adjacent development, and to enhance the unique
character of the community.
Advisory Design Panel:
A Development Permit is required and must be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to
second reading.
- 4 -
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is required for this application. Prior to second reading, the
applicant is required to host a Development Information Meeting in accordance with Council Policy
6.20.
e) Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a) Engineering Department;
b) Operations Department;
c) Fire Department;
d) Licences Permits and Bylaws Department;
e) Parks Department;
f) Utility companies;
g) Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; and
h) Canada Post.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between first and second reading.
f) Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended:
1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C);
2. A Commercial Development Permit Application (Schedule D); and
3. A Development Variance Permit Application (Schedule E);
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
- 5 -
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is in compliance with the OCP, therefore, it is recommended that Council
grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second
reading.
It is recommended that Council not require any further additional OCP consultation.
“Original signed by Adam Rieu”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adam Rieu
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7358-2017
Appendix D – Proposed Site Plan
DATE: Apr 21, 2017
2017-155-RZ
BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
´
Scale: 1:2,500
21319 & 21333 LOUGHEED HWYLegend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX A
DATE: Apr 21, 2017
2017-155-RZ
BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
´
Scale: 1:2,500
21319 & 21333 LOUGHEED HWY
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7358-2017
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7358-2017."
2.Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 4 District Lot 248 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 8043
Parcel “A” (Explanatory Plan 9614) Lot 5 District Lot 248 Group 1 New Westminster
District Plan 8043
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1720 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to C-2 (Community Commercial).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of
, 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
LOUGHEED
H
W
Y
.LAITY ST.MORRIS ST.11767
2123711762
2125021232212411179211848
11755
11872
11777 2133311894/11896
11790 21347213752125411746
11788
11781
11904/11902
11866
11769
11879
2124011826
2141521247213112124311915
2140911904
117352127911856/58
21280212382131911828
11895
2128311745
386
3061
309
318
Rem. 378
4
308
307
387
389
73
425
A
6
388
4 B
A
1
1
420
305
3 A
393
304
S 1/2 A
390
"A"
216 303
J
77
45
391
78
421
2
1
216
P 20050
P 59408P 5042
SK 7191
P 45659
EP
P 34479 P 23005LMP 4326
LMP 3769
LMS 340
P 41630P 52824
*PP 168
P 59410
P 66125
P 9329
BCP 18456
9614
P 33600
LMP 1404 P 8043
NWS 2640
LMP 38030
P 692
P 25353
P 72989
P 20234
LMP 1200
RW 42913
BCP 21377
P 43436
EP 63872P 43436
BCP 49441
RW 75503
EP 37323
BCP 18457
RW 43436
RW 44250
EP 23585
BCP 30312 (lease)
P 43436
LMP 3771
RW 74553RW 59409BCP 49441
LOUGHEED HWY.LAITY ST.´
SCALE 1:2,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No.From:
To:
RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
C-2 (Community Commercial)
7358-20171720
APPENDIX D
1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-242-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Council
SUBJECT: First Reading
Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7394-2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At the October 17, 2017 Workshop, Council considered and discussed the draft Zoning Bylaw
amendments pertaining to home based businesses.
At the October 17, 2017 Workshop Council passed the following resolution:
That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7394-2017 to amend the home occupation
regulations of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 be forwarded to the next Council meeting for
consideration of first reading.
As per the above resolution the proposed bylaw is attached along with a copy of the report from the
October 17, 2017 Workshop.
As discussed at the October 17, 2017 Workshop the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) allows
home occupation on parcels in the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) and this Bylaw regulates land use
within the ALR. Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7394-2017, if given first reading, will be referred to the
ALC for comment. Comments received from the ALC will be included as part of the second reading
report of Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7394-2017.
RECOMMENDATION:
i)That Bylaw No. 7394 – 2017 be given first reading and be forwarded to the Agricultural
Land Commission for comment.
ii)Upon receipt of Agricultural Land Commission comments, that Bylaw No. 7394-2017 be
forwarded to the next available Council meeting for second reading and be forwarded to
Public Hearing.
1102
2
CONCLUSION:
Bylaw No. 7394-2017 attached to this report is being recommended for first reading in accordance
with Council’s direction at the October 17, 2017 Workshop.
“Original signed by Amanda Grochowich”
______________________________________________
Prepared by: Amanda Grochowich, MCIP, RPP
Planner 1
“Original signed by Bruce Livingstone” for
______________________________________________
Concurrence: Lino Siracusa
Manager of Economic Development
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendix is attached hereto:
Appendix A – Zoning Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 7394 – 2017
Appendix B – October 17, 2017 Council Workshop Report titled Home Occupation Engagement
Summary Report and Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7394-2017
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7394-2017
A Bylaw to amend the text of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended
____________________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as
amended:
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This bylaw may be cited as “Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. No Bylaw 7394-2017”.
2.That PART 2 INTERPRETATION is amended by inserting the following between “Animal
Shelter” and “Apartment”:
ANIMAL SERVICES means a use providing individualized services to an animal recipient.
Typical services include walking, grooming, dog day care, aqua or physical therapy, and
training. Does not include commercial kennels, breeding, and dog boarding.
3.That PART 2 INTERPRETATION is amended by inserting the following between “Boarding” and
“Body Rub Studio”:
BODY MODIFICATION means altering a person’s body for nonmedical purposes, and includes
but is not limited to piercing, tattooing and micro-pigmentation services.
4.That Part 2 INTERPRETATION definition of “Business Services” is deleted and replaced with:
BUSINESS SERVICES means a use providing services to a business including, but not limited
to, information technology and support, desktop publishing, data processing, bookkeeping,
internet access, copying and printing services, mailing services, telephone reception and
consulting services.
5.That PART 2 INTERPRETATION is amended by inserting the following between “Habitable
Room” and “Height”:
HEALTH SERVICES means a use providing medical services to the general public where the
practitioner is subject to a College or Association that has been delegated the authority,
under provincial legislation, to govern the practice of their members in the public interest,
and includes, but is not limited to, audiologists, chiropractors, dentists, nurses, massage
therapists, optometrists, physicians and traditional Chinese medicine practitioners.
6.That PART 2 INTERPRETATION is amended by inserting the following between “Home
Occupation” and “Housing Agreement”:
HOMECRAFT means a use providing for the small scale production of goods intended for
sale, consumption or use by another. Typical uses include, but not limited to, art,
photography, jewelry, food, bath and beauty products, clothing and toys.
APPENDIX A
7.That PART 2 INTERPRETATION is amended by inserting the following between “Net Density”
and “Office Use”:
NON-RESIDENT EMPLOYEE means a person receiving or entitled to receive wages or other
compensation for work performed for an employer operating a home occupation but is not a
resident on the lot. It also includes a person being trained by an employer for an employer’s
home occupation.
8.That Part 2 INTERPRETATION definition of “Personal Service” is deleted and replaced with:
PERSONAL SERVICES means a use providing individualized services to a recipient. Including,
but not limited to, animal services, barbering, beauty salons, hairdressing, personal wellness,
tailoring, shoemaking, dry-cleaning, personal trainers, nutritionists, and weight loss clinics,
but excluding overnight boarding of dogs, kennels, adult entertainment and pawnshop use.
9.That Part 2 INTERPRETATION definition of “Professional Services” is deleted and replaced
with:
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES means a use providing services to the general public in which the
provider of the service is required to be licensed or certified by a self-regulating professional
association or by Federal, Provincial, or Municipal authorities and may include, but not be
limited to, accountants, architects, engineers, health service providers, insurance and
employment agencies, lawyers, planners, real estate agents, and veterinarians.
10.That Part 4, GENERAL REGULATIONS, 402 REGULATIONS FOR PERMITTED USES OF LAND,
BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES (4) Home Occupation Use be amended by deleting the existing
regulation under Section 402 (4) in their entirety, and inserting the following:
Where permitted, a Home Occupation shall:
(a) Be entirely enclosed within:
(i) A dwelling unit; or
(ii) An accessory building.
(b)Be considered for Agricultural, Residential and CD (Comprehensive Development) zones:
(i) A Type 1 Home Occupation where the operation occurs in a multi-family unit,
unless otherwise prohibited by this Bylaw; or
(ii) A Type 1 Home Occupation where the operation occurs on a lot less than 1,200.0
m2 ; or
(iii) A Type 2 Home Occupation where the operation occurs on a lot equal to or
greater than 1,200.0 m2; or
(iv) A Type 3 Home Occupation where the operation occurs on a lot equal to or
greater than 0.4 ha, as expressly permitted by this Bylaw.
(c) Occupy not more than:
(i) 30% of the gross floor area of the dwelling unit and accessory building in which
the home occupation is located, up to maximum of 50.0 m2 in total for Type 1
Home Occupations; or
(ii) 45% of the gross floor area of the dwelling unit and accessory building in which
the home occupation is located, up to a maximum of 100.0m2 in total for Type 2
Home Occupations;
(d) Be conducted by the resident of the dwelling unit and, provided that non-resident
employee parking is accommodated on-site, be permitted up to a maximum of:
(i) 2 non-resident employees for Type 1 Home Occupations; or
(ii) 3 non-resident employees for Type 2 Home Occupations.
(e)Be permitted on-site client visits, only by appointment scheduled in advance, up to a
maximum of:
(i) 10 clients per day for Type 1 Home Occupations; or
(ii) 16 clients per day for Type 2 Home Occupations.
(f) Be permitted, subject to Section 402.4 (e), group sessions up to a maximum of:
(i) 6 clients at any one time for Type 1 Home Occupations; and
(ii) 8 clients at any one time for Type 2 Home Occupations.
(g) Be permitted for the following uses:
(i) Animal Services, excluding dog day care and for Type 1 Home Occupations,
restricted to off-site or mobile-based services only;
(ii) Business Services;
(iii) Office uses;
(iv) Health Services;
(v) Homecraft;
(vi) Personal Services, excluding dry cleaning;
(vii) Professional Services;
(viii) Tutoring & Lessons;
(ix) Family Day Care, unless otherwise expressly prohibited by this Bylaw. For
Neighbourhood Day Care requirements refer to Section 402.10 of this Bylaw; and
(x)Off-site, online and mobile-based sales.
(h) Be permitted the storage on the lot of not more than one vehicle provided that it is used
in connection with the home occupation and that such vehicle not be in excess of
3,630.0 kilograms licenced gross vehicle weight and be subject to Section 402.6 of this
Bylaw.
(i) Comply with Agricultural Land Reserve Use, Subdivision and Procedure Regulation (BC
Reg. 171/2002), Section 3(1)(c) and ALC Policy L-07 Home Occupation Use in the ALR.
(j) Be prohibited for the following uses and/or activities:
(i) Body modification;
(ii) Assembly use;
(iii) Orchestra and band training;
(iv) A family daycare use within a dwelling unit in the RM-2 (Medium Density
Apartment Residential), RM-3 (Medium/High Density Apartment Residential), an
apartment use within RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential), RM-5 (Low Density
Apartment Residential), RM-6 (High Density Apartment Residential), C and CS
zones.
(v) The unenclosed storage or display of raw materials, components, or stock-in-
trade;
(vi) The retail sale of goods or products where customers enter the premises to
inspect purchase or take possession of goods without making an appointment in
advance;
(vii) The discharge or emit odorous, noxious or toxic matter or vapours, heat, glare,
noise or radiation, or recurrently generated ground vibrations;
(viii) The generation of traffic congestion, electrical interference, fire hazards or health
hazards;
(ix) The use of mechanical or electrical equipment except as is ordinarily employed in
purely domestic and household use, or recreational hobbies, or office uses; and
(x)The external structural alteration to the principal building, ensuring that there
shall be no exterior indication that the building is used for a purpose other than a
residential use, except for signage permitted in accordance with Maple Ridge
Sign Bylaw No. 6830-2011.
11.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 as amended is hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20 .
READ a second time the day of , 20 .
READ a third time the day of , 20 .
ADOPTED the day of , 20 .
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 17, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-242-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Workshop
SUBJECT: Home Occupation Engagement Summary Report and Maple Ridge Zone Amending
Bylaw No. 7394-2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Council directed that the home occupation regulations be reviewed as an outcome of the
Commercial Industrial Strategy. The intent of the review was to look at ways to update, modernize
and improve regulations to better facilitate our existing 1445 licenced home based businesses and
provide greater opportunities for enabling home based businesses in the City while balancing the
needs of the neighbourhoods in which these businesses exist.
In July 2017, Council received a draft set of possible new zoning regulations for home based
businesses. The proposed home based business program creates a two-pronged set of regulations:
one for multifamily and one family and two family residential zoned lots less than 1,200m2 (0.3 ac)
and another for one family and two family residential zoned lots greater than 1,200m2 (0.3 ac). A
number of new directions have been proposed which include expanding: the permitted floor area of
a home based business, relative to lot size; the number of employees allowed in a home based
business; the number of daily visits that can be accommodated by a home based business; and the
types of activities permitted as a home based business.
The review also acknowledged that there may be situations where a home based business use may
warrant a level of expansion not anticipated by the above described types of home based
businesses. This report recommends that the City explore the creation of a new zone to allow for
larger accessory home based business uses on residential zoned lots that are greater than one acre
in size. As this would require a text amendment process, this ensures that each home based
business would be evaluated on a case by case basis and be able to take into account any possible
site-specific considerations.
In September 2017, community outreach initiatives revealed the importance of updating the home
based business zoning bylaw regulations and the desire to explore a full range of possible home
based business uses. Community members recognize the benefits of supporting local job growth
within the City and widely supported the new directions. This report summarizes the community
consultation activities and feedback for Council as well as provides a revised set of regulatory
changes for the Zoning Bylaw for Council to consider.
RECOMMENDATION:
i)That Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7394 – 2017 to amend the home occupation
regulations of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 be forwarded to the next Council meeting for
consideration of first reading.
APPENDIX B
2
BACKGROUND:
In 2015, following the Council resolution that the regulations for home based businesses be
reviewed, staff undertook a background review, held internal meetings with Economic Development
and Bylaw & Licencing Services Departments, and drafted a discussion paper on home based
business as a means of identifying the potential areas where regulatory revisions might occur.
In 2016, the Economic Development Committee established three task forces to reflect key
directions for the Economic Development Department: Tourism, Technology, and Home Based
Business. The Home Based Business Task Force (HBB Task Force) began meeting in the summer of
2016. Task Force meetings were attended by staff from Economic Development, Planning and
Bylaw & Licencing Services. Since that time, the HBB Task Force has identified three components to
address for home based business: regulations, communication, and process.
In January 2017, staff reviewed current and possible new zoning regulations with the HBB Task
Force for feedback. Following that meeting, staff from Economic Development, Planning, and Bylaw
& Licencing Services prepared a draft set of possible new regulations for home based businesses.
On March 6, 2017, a number of possible home based business regulatory requirements were
presented for Council consideration. In the Council discussion that ensued, Council raised the issue
of whether the proposed revisions went far enough, given the economic opportunities home based
businesses are perceived to present to Maple Ridge residents. In addition, Council raised questions,
sought clarity on the possible new home based business zoning bylaw requirements and then
directed staff to bring the item back for further Council consideration.
From March through June 2017, building on the work undertaken to-date, Staff continued to
collaborate with the HBB Task Force to further explore opportunities to improve home based
business regulation in the City. These revised directions and the parameters that influenced their
further evolution were presented to Council on July 18, 2017.
SUMMARY OF POSSIBLE CHANGES TO ZONING BYLAW:
Based on input from the HBB Task Force and background research, possible changes to the Zoning
Bylaw were proposed to Council. A number of new directions have been proposed which include
expanding:
The permitted floor area of a home based business, relative to lot size;
The number of employees allowed in a home based business;
The number of daily visits that can be accommodated by a home based business; and
The types of activities permitted as a home a based business.
The proposed home based business program creates a two-pronged set of regulations. For ease of
engagement, the two-pronged set of regulations have been renamed Type 1 Home Based Business
for operations in multi-family units and on one family and two family residential zoned lots less than
1,200m2 (0.3 ac) and Type 2 Home Based Business for operations on one family and two family
residential zoned lots greater than 1,200m2 (0.3 ac).
In addition, staff recognized that there may be opportunities on larger properties to accommodate
certain uses that may not be permitted under the proposed home based business regulations. This
further option was considered as a Type 3 Home Based Business.
A summary table outlining the proposed home based business regulatory changes are included as
Appendix A.
3
SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION PROCESS
Retitled as ‘Home Based Business Update’ for the purpose of community engagement, the
consultation activities can be broken down into three main themes: resident engagement, outreach
activities targeting local businesses, and feedback collected through a community survey.
Taking place throughout September 2017, the consultation program specifically consisted of a
Public Open House, community survey, booth at the Haney Farmers Market, staff presentations at
several community-based business groups, 15 minute Q&A ‘Coffee Chats with City Staff’ with
interested individuals, a Home Based Business Networking Event (hosted by the HBB Task Force)
and, as requested by Council, a targeted mail-out to all licenced home based businesses in the City.
A copy of the engagement materials and the verbatim responses are available in Appendix B.
i)Resident Engagement
To solicit resident feedback, two public events took place supported by promotional
activities.
On Saturday September 9, 2017, Staff attended the Haney Farmers Market with a booth
soliciting input on the Home Based Business Update. Staff attendance was advertised
through the Home Based Business Update website and flyers available at the Planning,
Economic Development and Bylaw Services & Licencing front counters.
On September 13, 2017 a Public Open House was held between 4 and 8 p.m. in the
Fraser Room of the Maple Ridge Library. Notification and advertising for the event was
conducted through four newspaper advertisements, a listing on the City’s website, social
media outlets, flyers available at the Planning, Economic Development and Bylaw
Services & Licencing front counters, and at Council request, the use of approximately
1500 mailed letters to licenced home based businesses. Approximately twenty people
attended the Open House, as well as members of the HBB Task Force. Following the
event, the open house presentation boards were made available on the City’s website.
A mailing list for a Home Based Business E-Newsletter was also created and
subsequently used to provide further information and updates about the engagement
process to the public. Over 70 e-mails were collected throughout September.
ii)Business Outreach
Business operators were also invited to opt-in to the Home Based Business E-Newsletter
and all licenced home based businesses received mailed notification of the Home Based
HBB Policy +
Best Practice
Research
Establish HBB
Task Force +
Identify Issues
Prepare
Draft HBB
Regulations
Discuss
with Wider
Community
Amend
Zoning
Bylaw
WE ARE HERE
4
Business Update process which identified engagement opportunities taking place
throughout September.
Planning Staff hosted ‘Coffee Chats with City Staff’ as an opportunity to provide tailored
feedback on how the proposed changes may impact an existing operation or how they
might enable a new home based business. Over ten businesses expressed interest in a
Coffee Chat and by early October, at the time of preparing this report, three had taken
place, with two anticipated in the following week.
Planning Staff also attended several local business community groups to increase
awareness of the home based business update process. Presentations took place at
Women’s AM (35 attendees) and Babes in Business (15 attendees). The Chamber of
Commerce was also contacted as a potential option, but no response was received.
A Home Based Business Networking Event, hosted by the Home Based Business Task
Force, took place in the afternoon on Friday, September 22, 2017 at The Well. The event
was promoted through the local newspaper, social media, mail-out, and event-specific
advertising including posters and post-cards (which were available at the Farmers
Market, Open House and front counters). Approximately twenty people attended the
Networking Event, in addition to City Staff and members of the HBB Task Force.
iii) Community Survey
Supporting the residential and business outreach initiatives was a community
questionnaire. The survey was used to assess comfort level with the proposed updates to
the home based business zoning regulations.
Paper copies of the survey were available at the Haney Farmers Market, Public Open
House, outreach events, and the Home Based Business Networking Event. The survey
was also available online from September 13th to October 1st on the City’s Home Based
Business Update website. Home Based Business Task Force members generously
donated several prizes for a City-run sweepstakes draw as an added incentive to
encourage survey responses.
Of the 177 submitted community surveys, 114 were completed in full. Responses are
mixed – 53% from general interested residents, 34% from those who operate a business
in Maple Ridge, 8% from those considering starting a home based business in Maple
Ridge and 5% ‘other’. Thirty percent of the respondents identified themselves as
currently operating a home based business in Maple Ridge.
CONSULTATION OUTCOMES:
i) General Feedback:
The community expressed broad levels of support for the home based business update
process and the proposed changes. Recognizing the changing nature of business and
household needs, many residents indicated that ‘it was time’ for this level of change to
the home based business regulations in Maple Ridge. Members of local business groups
also expressed enthusiasm for the intended direction of the home based business
update and were pleased to see the City emphasizing local business development within
the City.
5
ii)Location & Size
Strong support (88%) was received for broadening where a home based business can be
accommodated on a residential lot. Currently, a home based business is only permitted
to operate from a dwelling unit (with the exception of RS-2, RS-3 and A zones which are
currently permitted a home based business in an accessory building). The proposed
update would permit a home based business to take place in both the main dwelling unit
that makes up the home as well as in a secondary suite or detached garden suite (DGS)
and in an accessory building in all residential zones. Additional comments through
conversation reinforced the support for permitting a home based business in a
secondary suite and/or DGS in order to support intergenerational living.
Again, strong support was received for increasing the amount of floor area permitted for
Type 1 Home Based Businesses (92%) and Type 2 Home Based Businesses (92%).
Currently, home based businesses are permitted up to 20% of the residential floor area,
up to 50m2 or 538 sq ft. The proposed update would permit a Type 1 Home Based
Business up to 30% of the gross floor area, to a maximum of 50m2 or 538 sq ft, for home
based businesses in multi-family units and on one family and two family residential
zoned lots under 1,200m2 or 0.3 acres and up to 45% of the gross floor area, to a
maximum of 100m2 or 1,76 sq ft, for Type 2 Home Based Businesses on one family and
two family residential zoned lots over 1,200m2 or 0.3 acres.
iii)Daily Visits & Employees
Currently, a home based business cannot receive daily visits by clients (with the
exception of Tutoring & Lessons which is permitted up to six people per day). The
proposed update would allow daily visits by clients, by appointment, for all permitted
home based business uses up to ten clients per day for Type 1 Home Based Businesses
and up to sixteen clients per day for Type 2 Home Based Businesses. The proposed
expansion received positive support for both Type 1 Home Based Businesses (80% in
favour) and Type 2 Home Based Businesses (85% in favour) although some discussion
occurred regarding the reasoning behind why a daily maximum was required.
Similarly, the proposal to permit up to five clients at any one time for Type 1 Home Based
Businesses and up to eight at any one time for Type 2 Home Based Businesses received
positive support (85% and 86%, respectively). However, through long-form survey
responses and in-person discussions it was made clear that many current Home Based
Business operators viewed limiting group sessions to five for Type 1 Home Based
Businesses as a concern noting the current cap of six. This issue and staff’s proposed
response is addressed in more detail in the following discussion section.
Currently, a home based business is permitted one non-resident employee. It is proposed
to permit a home based business up to two non-resident employees for Type 1 Home
Based Businesses and up to three non-resident employees for Type 2 Home Based
Businesses, providing employee parking is provided on-site. The proposed expansion
received strong support for both Type 1 and Type 2 Home Based Businesses (91% and
91%, respectively).
iv)Permitted Home Based Business Uses
As part of the review of the home based business zoning regulations, it is proposed to
expand the types of activities permitted as home based business uses. Respondents
indicated if they would support the type of activity as a permitted use for only Type 1
6
Home Based Businesses, only Type 2 Home Based Businesses, or for both Type 1 and
Type 2 Home Based Businesses.
The table on the following page indicates the levels of support received for permitting the
proposed types of activities for both Type 1 and Type 2 Home Based Businesses.
Use Level of Support for use for both Type 1
and Type 2 Home Based Businesses
Animal Services 67%
Health Services 76%
Homecraft 85%
Office & Business Services 85%
Off-site, online and mobile-based sales 86%
Personal Services 81%
Professional Services 82%
Tutoring & Lessons 87%
Expectedly, Animal and Health Services were the two uses to receive the lowest amount
of support. In both cases, it is worth noting that respondents indicated a parallel interest
in permitting the uses only as a Type 2 Home Based Business (21% for Animal; 12% for
Health), which is counter to the proposed home based business regulations. For more
information and staff’s response on this matter, refer to the below discussion section.
v)Type 3 Home Based Business
Recognizing there may be opportunities on larger properties (i.e. one or more acres) to
accommodate additional uses or at levels of visitation and employment that are not
permitted under the proposed Type 1 and Type 2 Home Based Business categories, input
was solicited on a proposed third category for home based businesses. Possible activities
could include yoga or spa retreats, agri-tourism opportunities, and small wedding &
celebration events. Strong support from the survey (97%) as well as through in-person
discussion was received for the proposed Type 3 Home Based Business category.
Respondents indicated a preference for permitting Type 3 Home Based Businesses as an
outright use (65%) over a new zone (26%), as the outright approach was seen to be less
onerous for an applicant, yet could incorporate options to enforce complaints. In-person
conversation and long-form survey responses also indicated a preference for not
permitting a business that could disturb a neighbourhood with excessive noise, fumes,
outdoor storage and traffic. Other possible uses suggested for a Type 3 Home Based
Business included health services, animal services, professional retreats, agri-tech, food
packaging, small trucking/distribution companies, cooking classes, and child care.
DISCUSSION:
Community outreach initiatives have clearly revealed support for updating the home based business
zoning bylaw regulations and the desire to explore a full range of possible home based business
uses. Community members recognize the benefits of supporting local job growth within the City and
support the new directions. At the same time, community dialogue did raise some concerns that
would benefit from further discussion.
i)Daily Visits & Group Sessions
The updates brought forward proposed to permit up to five clients at any one time for
multi-family units and single family lots under 1,200m2 (0.3 acres) and up to eight clients
at any one time for single family lots over 1,200m2 (0.3 acres). However, a common
7
concern and topic of discussion throughout the consultation activities was the
importance of maintaining six clients at once for tutoring and lesson uses for business
viability and to remain consistent with current allowances. Having discussed these
parameters with members of the public and of home based business owners, it is now
recommended to increase the number of permitted clients from five to six for home
based businesses in multi-family units and on one family and two family residential
zoned lots under 1,200m2 (0.3 acres), subject to the daily maximum of ten daily visits.
The proposed maximum number of group clients for home based businesses on one
family and two family residential zoned lots over 1,200m2 or more remains unchanged.
ii) Permitted Uses
Interest in expanding the types of uses permitted as a home based business was
demonstrated to be strong. Not surprisingly, discussion took place about the parameters
of three of the proposed home based business uses: Animal Services, Health Services
and Personal Services.
Some concern was noted about permitting Animal Services as an on-site Type 1 Home
Based Business given the smaller site area, therefore staff continue to recommend that
only mobile-based animal service operations be permitted for Type 1 Home Based
Businesses. Type 2 Home Based Business Animal Service operations would be permitted
both mobile-based and on-site operations.
The level of support received for permitting on-site Health Services for Type 1 was less
pronounced, yet still quite positive. However, there was a clear call for permitting Health
Services as a permitted use for Type 3 Home Based Businesses. Staff continue to
support on-site Health Services as a permitted use for Type 1 and Type 2 Home Based
Businesses as well as suggest Health Services as a permitted use for Type 3 Home
Based Businesses, noting the opportunity for such a use to be enlarged under the
possible third type of home based business.
Clear and enthusiastic support for permitting personal services as a home based
business use for both Type 1 and Type 2 Home Based Businesses was received
throughout the community consultation process. Feedback received indicated interest in
services such as reflexology as well as non-RMT massage being included within the
personal services umbrella. Given on-going discussions with Fraser Health and Bylaw &
Licencing Services, it is understood that these services would be able to be included and
approved as a personal service home based business use.
iii) Types of Home Based Business
Throughout the consultation process the two-pronged approach to home based business
regulation was well received, including the 1,200m2 (0.3 acre) threshold between Type 1
and Type 2 Home Based Businesses. When looking at opportunities for larger home
based businesses to be accommodated on larger properties, there was strong support
for pursuing an avenue to incorporate a potential Type 3 Home Based Business.
While feedback identified strong support for the Type 3 Home Based Business concept,
reservations were identified regarding the potential impacts a Type 3 Home Based
Business may have on the neighbourhood. Community consultation supports considering
each application for a Type 3 Home Based Business on its own merits, and be subject to
site-specific traffic, servicing, on-site parking, screening, among other requirements.
Equally, the feedback received expressed interest in not creating a process that would be
8
onerous for an applicant. Feedback also identified the importance of the complaint
process, and having enforcement as an option, if needed.
While survey responses identified support for permitting Type 3 Home Based Businesses
as an outright use, the unknowns related to future and possibly unique home based
business proposals along with the need to assess any possible impacts on a site specific
basis, has led staff to recommend that individual text amendments to the Zoning Bylaw
be the implementation tool for Type 3 Home Based Businesses. A text amendment would
permit each application to be considered on a case-by-case basis and would result in
site-specific requirements that would, ideally, address any possible neighbourhod
impacts. A text amendment also permits the opportunity for public comment on each
application, through the public hearing process.
iv)Parking
Many residents, home based business operators, and staff from Bylaw & Licencing
Services have identified and raised reservations over the parking implications the
proposed changes may present. While on-site parking requirements for non-resident
employees of Type 1 and Type 2 Home Based Businesses are envisioned to be dealt with
on-site, it is worth highlighting that few home based business operators indicated that
they employ (or have previously) employed an employee. Should these proposed changes
be adopted, Bylaw & Licencing Services have agreed to monitor and report any potential
impacts from increasing the number of visiting clients on the neighbourhoods.
v)Other Considerations
Overnight Stays
Community members indicated an interest in how overnight uses (including AirBnB)
would be incorporated into the Zoning Bylaw however there was also the recognition that
it is a separate discussion and not considered a home based business use. Additional
reports to Council regarding overnight stays (including AirBnB) will be forthcoming
through the Economic Development Department.
Permit Process
Community consultation revealed several specific concerns with the business licencing
procedures specifically related to home based businesses. While outside of the scope of
this home based business update which is focused on zoning amendments, it does
identify areas for future review by either the Home Based Business Task Force and/or as
part of the Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw alignment which would be required
should any proposed changes to the zoning bylaw regarding home based businesses be
adopted. Additional reports to Council regarding the home based business permitting
process will be forthcoming through the Economic Development Department.
Encouraging Regional Economic Opportunities
Community outreach identified strong interest in the Inter-municipal Business Licencing
program. Specifically, business owners would like to see the program expanded from
construction-related operations to include a wider range of business types. Few home
based business operators indicated an interest in growing their business beyond the
home to seek a commercial space although more indicated a desire to grow the business
within the home. Additional reports to Council encouraging regional economic
opportunities for home based businesses will be forthcoming through the Economic
Development Department.
9
HOME BASED BUSINESS TASK FORCE:
Staff would like to acknowledge the dedication of the HBB Task Force members for their input on the
proposed changes to the Zoning Bylaw as well as their time and effort in supporting the City’s
community consultation activities throughout September.
At their September 26, 2017 meeting, following the September engagement activities, the HBB Task
Force reiterated their support of the revised directions and parameters of the proposed updates to
the Zoning Bylaw. While there was an identified preference for permitting Type 3 Home Based
Businesses as an outright use over a rezoning process, the HBB Task Force expressed support for
the Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7394-2017 to be considered by Council in its current
form, introducing the minor responses proposed by Staff following the community’s input.
The HBB Task Force looks forward to advancing with their mandate to help make the City more
‘home based business friendly’ by being involved in the review of the home based business
permitting process and with the communication and promotion of the updated home based business
regulations.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL IMPLICATIONS:
Agricultural Land Commission
As the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) allows home occupation on parcels in the Agricultural
Land Reserve (ALR) and this Bylaw regulates land use within the ALR, Zone Amending Bylaw No.
7394-2017, if given first reading, will be referred to the ALC for comment. Comments received from
the ALC will be included as part of the second reading report of Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7394-
2017.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL IMPLICATIONS:
Bylaw & Licencing Services Department
The Bylaw & Licencing Services Department has been working in collaboration with both the
Planning and Economic Development Departments. Recognizable challenges have been raised over
a number of the proposed amendments. This includes the need to monitor the potential for
neighbourhood traffic and parking impacts from increasing the permitted number of visiting clients
to each home based business and the continued challenge of unenclosed storage, and the parking
of commercial vehicles, at home based businesses.
Bylaw & Licencing Services staff are interested in using the home based business regulatory review
process as an opportunity to align several bylaws. It would also be an opportunity to refine and
potentially address some of the previously identified concerns with the home based business
licencing process, including the implementation of mobile business licences. Should the proposed
changes be adopted, changes to the Business Licencing and Regulation Bylaw would be required
and would follow in a separate report.
Economic Development Department
As the organizers of the HBB Task Force, the Economic Development Department has been involved
with the home based businesses review. The Economic Development Department supports and
encourages home based business expansion within the City as they are considered an essential step
in creating businesses within the community. Additional reports to Council regarding the work of the
HBB Task Force in regards to the communication and process components will be forthcoming
through the Economic Development Department.
10
DRAFT BYLAW:
Originally, Staff were tasked with providing Council with a summary of the consultation feedback in
order to shape the direction of the Zoning Bylaw amendments. However, having heard strong support
for the proposed updates to the home based business zoning bylaw regulations, Staff support
moving forward with a bylaw to amend the home occupation regulations of the Zoning Bylaw. Given
the positive feedback from the community consultation activities covered in this report, and allowing
for the minor changes outlined above, staff present Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7394-
2017 for Council consideration. Staff ask that Bylaw No. 7394-2017 be forwarded to the next
Council meeting for consideration by Council for first reading. The full text of Zone Amending Bylaw
No. 7394-2017 is available in Appendix C.
CONCLUSION:
The intent of the home based business review was to look at ways to update, modernize and
improve regulations to better facilitate existing home based businesses and provide greater
opportunities for expanding home based business in the City while balancing the needs of the
residential communities in which these operations exist. With the presented regulatory changes,
such measures represent a key step in an overall home based business review process that is aimed
at promoting the City as “home based business friendly”. This report summarizes the results of the
community consultation which took place throughout September 2017.
“Original signed by Amanda Grochowich”
______________________________________________
Prepared by: Amanda Grochowich, MCIP, RPP
Planner 1
“Original signed by Lino Siracusa”
______________________________________________
Concurrence: Lino Siracusa
Manager of Economic Development
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
–See Workshop agenda of October 17, 2017
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-318-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: First Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7379-2017
12842 Alouette Road
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to allow a subdivision of three single family
lots ranging in size from 4,000 m2 to 5,137 m2. An Official Community Plan (OCP) amendment to
redesignate the southeast portion of the subject property as Conservation will be required to identify
and protect the steep slopes and watercourse located there.
This application is exempt from the Community Amenity Contribution charge because less than four
single family lots are being proposed.
To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the
development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether
consultation is required with specifically:
i.The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the
case of a Municipal Official Community Plan;
ii.The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iii.The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan;
iv. First Nations;
v.Boards of Education, Greater Boards and Improvements District Boards; and
vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies.
and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this
matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the City’s
website, together with an invitation to the public to comment, and;
That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7379-2017 be given first reading; and
That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules (A, C, F and J) of the
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999, along with the information required for a
Subdivision application.
1103
-2 -
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Aplin & Martin Consultants, David Laird
Legal Description: Lot 4, Except: Firstly: Part on Plan 3041, Secondly: Parcel “A”
(Reference Plan 4611), Section 27, Township 12, NWP2510
OCP:
Existing: Suburban Residential
Proposed: Suburban Residential and Conservation
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-2
Designation: Suburban and Estate Suburban Residential
South: Use: Road Right of Way and Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-3
Designation: Suburban Residential
East: Use: Vacant
Zone: RS-2
Designation: Suburban Residential
West: Use: Road Right of Way and Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-3
Designation: Suburban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 1.546 ha (3.82 acres)
Access: Alouette Road
Servicing requirement: Rural Standard
b)Site Characteristics:
The subject property, located at 12842 Alouette Road, is a trapezoidal shaped lot 15,460 m 2 (3.82
acres) in size. It is located to the northeast and outside of the urban area boundary, close to the
South Alouette River (see Appendix A). The subject property is generally flat except in its southeast
corner where steep slopes lead up to a ridge. A tributary of Bosa Creek may also be located in the
southeast corner of the lot. The subject property is grassed and largely clear of trees except on its
periphery, and contains a single family dwelling as well as a number of sheds and other storage
outbuildings (see Appendix B).
-3 -
The subject property is generally surrounded by single family dwellings in a rural setting. A road right
of way for 128 Street borders the southern edge of the subject property, while Alouette Road and an
old railway alignment border its western edge. A sliver of the property was divided off from the
western edge of the main parcel when the right of way for the railway alignment was first proposed in
the early 1900s. It is anticipated that this sliver will be dedicated as road if the rezoning application
completes.
c)Project Description:
The current applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to accommodate the subdivision and
construction of approximately three single family dwellings ranging in size from 4,000 m2 to 5,137
m2. The proposed preliminary subdivision sketch (see Appendix D) shows that the lots front onto
Alouette Road.
At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official
Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will
need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a
further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot
boundaries and yields, OCP designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for
further development permits.
d) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The Official Community Plan designates the subject property as Suburban Residential. The following
OCP policies support the rezoning of the subject property to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
zone:
Section 3.1.3 Residential Designations, describes the Suburban Residential designation as
supporting single detached and duplex housing in areas outside the Urban Area Boundary
that have water service but which are not connected to the municipal sanitary sewer system.
Policy 3-11 supports single detached housing on large suburban lots. Lot sizes in this
designation are generally 0.4 hectares in size.
In August, 2016 Council received a staff report outlining Suburban Residential and Estate Suburban
Residential land use designation options. On September 5, 2017 after further review Council
resolved that no changes would be made to the Estate Suburban and Suburban Residential OCP
policies and that residential development in these areas could proceed accordingly.
The proposed rezoning and preliminary subdivision is also consistent with applications that have
been approved in the area. Properties immediately to the northwest and northeast were rezoned to
create RS-2 lots, while properties to the west, east and south are rural single family residential
areas.
Therefore, this application is consistent with the Suburban Residential designation of the OCP, and is
consistent with the character of the surrounding area.
-4 -
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 12842 Alouette Road from RS-3
(One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit the subdivision
of three single family residential lots. The minimum lot size for the current RS-3 zone is 8,000 m2,
and the minimum lot size for the proposed RS-2 zone is 4,000 m2. The proposed preliminary
subdivision sketch shows the three lots range in size from 4,000 m2 to 5,137 m2.
The applicant has proposed to dedicate approximately 1,490 m2 from the southeast end of the
property for the protection of the steep slope and watercourse located there. The sufficiency of this
dedicated area will be evaluated prior to second reading.
The current application has not requested any variances to the Zoning Bylaw at this time. Any
variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit
application.
Development Permits:
A Form and Character Development Permit is not required for single family residential developments.
Pursuant to Section 8.9 and 8.10 of the OCP, a combined Watercourse Protection/Natural Features
Development Permit application is required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and
enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas, and to ensure that development is protected from
hazardous conditions (i.e. steep slopes).
Pursuant to Section 8.12 of the OCP, a Wildfire Development Permit application is required for all
development and subdivision activity identified in wildfire risk areas. The purpose of the Wildfire
Development Permit is for the protection of life and property in designated areas that could be at risk
for wildland fire; and where this risk may be reasonably abated through implementation of
appropriate precautionary measures. The subject property is located within the Wildfire
Development Permit Area, identified on Map 1 in Section 8.12 of the Official Community Plan. Prior
to second reading, a Registered Professional Forester’s Report will be required to determine wildfire
mitigation requirements.
Advisory Design Panel:
This application does not need to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel because a Form and
Character Development Permit is not required for single family residential dwellings.
Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting is not required for this application because fewer than five
dwelling units are being proposed.
-5 -
e)Interdepartmental Implications:
In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought
from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below:
a)Engineering Department;
b)Fire Department;
c)Licences, Bylaws and Permits Department;
d)Parks Department;
e)School District;
f)Canada Post.
The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application
progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above.
This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time;
therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this
evaluation will take place between first and second reading.
f)Early and Ongoing Consultation:
In respect of Section 475 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community
Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early
posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the City’s website, together with an invitation to the
public to comment.
g)Development Applications:
In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by
Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879–1999 as amended:
1.An OCP Application (Schedule A);
2.A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule C);
3.A combined Watercourse Protection/Natural Features Development Permit Application
(Schedule F and G);
4.A Wildfire Development Permit Application (Schedule J);
5.A Subdivision Application.
The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the
assessment of the proposal progresses.
CONCLUSION:
The development proposal is in compliance with the policies of the OCP. Justification has been
provided to support an OCP amendment to redesignate the southwest portion of the subject property
as Conservation to account for the steep slopes and a watercourse located there. Therefore, it is
recommended that Council grant first reading to this rezoning application subject to additional
information being provided and assessed prior to second reading.
-6 -
It is recommended that Council not require any further additional OCP consultation.
The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations
governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must
be approved by the City of Maple Ridge’s Approving Officer.
“Original signed by Chee Chan”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Chee Chan, M.U.P., MCIP, RPP, B. Sc.
Planner 1
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P. Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7379-2017
Appendix D – Proposed Preliminary Subdivision Sketch
DATE: Jul 26, 2017
2017-318-RZ
12842 Alouette Road
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
128 Ave
´
Scale: 1:3,000 BY: JV
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
Marsh
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX A
DATE: Jul 26, 2017
2017-318-RZ
12842 Alouette Road
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
128 Ave
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´
Scale: 1:3,000 BY: JV
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
Marsh
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7379-2017
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7379-2017."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 4 Except: FIRSTLY: Part on Plan 3041 SECONDLY: Parcel “A” (Reference Plan
4611) Section 27 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 2510
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1728 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
2
4
6
S
T
.ALOUETTE ROAD24521 ALOUETTE RD.
129
3
212905
24660128
3
1
24440129
2
0
12842
129
5
3
12925129
4
61293012945
128
5
1 1291020
1
18
4
2
Rem 24
15
20
17
2
19
16
2
2
13
14
BCP 38687
B
C
P
4
3
3
2
5
P 2633
LMP
4
2
1
1
6
P 3041 LMP 42116P 2510
P 23770
P 2510
LMP 42116
P 31693LMP 42116P 3041B
C
P
4
3
3
2
7
LMP 42114
B
C
P
3
8
6
9
0BCP 38690LMP 36771B
C
P
3
8
6
8
8
B
C
P
3
8
6
9
0
B
C
P
4
3
3
2
6 LMP 43254
128 AVE.ALOUETTE ROAD´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
7379-20171728
APPENDIX D
-1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2015-347-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7383-2017 and
Second Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7193-2015
20621 123 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 20621 123 Avenue, from
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to
permit a future subdivision of approximately 10 lots. The minimum lot size for the proposed RS-1b
(One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone is 557m². The proposed RS-1b zoning
complies with the policies of the Official Community Plan (OCP); however, an amendment to the OCP
is required to adjust the Conservation boundary around the watercourse.
Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7193-2015 on January 12, 2016.
Pursuant with Council resolution, the application is subject to the Community Amenity Contribution
(CAC) Program at a rate of $5,100 per lot, for an estimated amount of $51,000.00.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1)That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and
on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7383-2017 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a
Development Information Meeting (DIM), and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any
further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw;
2)That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7383-2017 be considered in conjunction with
the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
3)That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7383-2017 is consistent
with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
4)That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7383-2017 be given first and second
readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
5)That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7193-2015 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public
Hearing;
6)That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i)Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedules "B" and “C”;
1104
-2 -
ii)Road dedication as required;
iii)Park dedication, as required, and removal of all debris and garbage from park land;
iv) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the
suitability of the subject property for the proposed development;
v)Removal of existing building/s;
vi) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional
Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the
subject property. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the
subject property is not a contaminated site; and
vii)That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $51,000.00 be provided in keeping with the
Council Policy with regard to Community Amenity Contributions.
DISCUSSION:
1)Background Context:
Applicant: Bissky Architecture and Urban Design Inc.
Legal Description: Lot 1 District Lot 276 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan
80156
OCP:
Existing: Urban Residential, Conservation
Proposed: Urban Residential, Conservation (new boundaries)
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Conservation
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Conservation
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
East: Use: Church
Zone: P-4 (Church Institutional)
Designation: Institutional and Conservation
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential and Conservation
- 3 -
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Singe Family Residential
Site Area: 1.05 Ha (2.6 acres)
Access: 123 Avenue and new road
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
2) Background:
The subject property, located at 20621 123 Avenue, is 1.05 ha (2.6 acres) in size and is bound by
the Burnett Fellowship Baptist Church to the east, City owned conservation land, including McKenney
Creek, to the north, single family lots to the west and 123 Avenue to the south (see Appendix A).
Currently a single family dwelling is located on the property close to the southern property boundary,
which is accessed from 123 Avenue. The majority of the subject property is relatively flat, with a
ravine and McKenney Creek located on the northern portion of the property. Mature conifer and
deciduous trees are located sporadically across the property; as well as grasses and invasive
species, such as Himalayan Blackberry (see Appendix B).
3) Project Description:
The applicant proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to
RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit future subdivision into
approximately ten single family residential lots. The proposed lots will be accessed from 123 Avenue
and a new local road. A portion of the proposed new local road was previously dedicated as a
component of the church re-development to the east. This new road may allow access to the Church
in the future; however, one of the two current accesses for the Church along 123 Avenue may
require removal if the new local road is to provide another access. The applicant intends to remove
the existing house, which will be a condition of final reading. McKenney Creek runs in an east-west
direction across the northern tip of the subject property and will be dedicated as Conservation as a
condition of final reading.
4) Planning Analysis:
i) Official Community Plan:
The subject property is located within the Urban Area Boundary and is currently designated Urban
Residential and Conservation. For the proposed development, an OCP amendment will be required
to adjust the Conservation area boundary (see Appendix C).
The subject property fronts 123 Avenue, which is identified as a Major Corridor in Figure 4, Appendix
E of the OCP. There are a range of development options that comply with Major Corridor Residential
Infill policies subject to neighbourhood compatibility and context. Major Corridor residential infill
options are described in Policy 3-20, as follows:
3 - 20 Major Corridor Residential Infill developments must be designed to be compatible with
the surrounding neighbourhood and will be evaluated against the following criteria:
a) building forms such as single detached dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes,
townhouses, apartments, and small lot intensive residential developments subject
to Policy 3-21;
b) a maximum height of two and one-half storeys (11m) with an emphasis on ground
oriented units for all developments except for apartments;
c) a maximum height of four storeys for apartments; and
-4 -
d) adherence to Development Permit Guidelines for multi-family and intensive
residential developments as outlined in Chapter 8 of the Official Community Plan.
Compatibility criteria for residential infill is further detailed in Policy 3-21 which states:
3 - 21 All Neighbourhood and Major Corridor Residential infill developments will respect and
reinforce the physical patterns and characteristics of established neighbourhoods, with
particular attention to:
a)the ability of the existing infrastructure to support the new development;
b)the compatibility of the site design, setbacks, and lot configuration with the existing
pattern of development in the area;
c) the compatibility between building massing and the type of dwelling units in the
proposed development and the surrounding residential properties;…
The proposed rezoning to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) is in conformance
with the Urban Residential – Major Corridor designation and infill policies.
ii)Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit future subdivision
into approximately ten single family residential lots (see Appendix D). The minimum lot size for the
current RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) zone is 0.80 ha (8000 m²) and the minimum lot size for
the proposed RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone is 557 m². Any
variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit
application.
iii)Proposed Variances:
A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves the
following relaxation:
Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985, Part 4, Section 406, Regulations For The Area, Shape and
Dimensions Of Lots That May Be Created by Subdivision (1)(a)(ii): To reduce the minimum
building area by 1.5m within the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
zone to accommodate a Statutory Right-of-Way for sanitary purposes on Lot 10.
The requested variances to the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone will be
the subject of a future Council report.
iv) Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is
required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top of bank of all
watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit is to
ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian
areas.
Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the OCP, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required
for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for:
- 5 -
All areas designated Conservation on Schedule “B” or all areas within 50 metres of an area
designated Conservation on Schedule “B”, or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver Valley Area
Plan;
All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent;
All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Schedule “C”
to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and
for development that is protected from hazardous conditions.
v) Advisory Design Panel:
A Form and Character Development Permit is not required for single family development; therefore,
this application does not need to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel.
vi) Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting was held at Burnett Fellowship Church on July 10, 2017.
Approximately 25 people attended the meeting. A summary of the main comments and discussions
with the attendees was provided by the applicant and include the following main points:
Concerns about the lot grading and road grading, in particular, that the storm water would
flow onto the church property;
Concern about the loss of privacy;
Concern about increased traffic caused by the ten new lots, and the potential hazard with the
existing church accesses; and
Access to the church from new road.
.
The following are provided in response to the issues raised by the public:
A bioswale will be located along the east side of proposed road adjacent to the Church to
capture storm water runoff and directed to a rain garden within Conservation area;
In terms of loss of privacy, the new lots are meeting setback requirements for the zone; and
Consideration has been given to access the Church from the new proposed road; however, if
this is to occur, one of the two existing accesses for the Church along 123 Avenue would be
required to be removed.
vii) Parkland Requirement:
As there are more than two additional lots proposed to be created, the developer will be required to
comply with the park dedication requirements of Section 510 of the Local Government Act prior to
subdivision approval. For this project, there is sufficient land that is proposed to be dedicated as
park on the subject property and this land will be required to be dedicated as a condition of final
reading.
5) Environmental Implications:
One component of the Stormwater Management Plan is a proposed bioswale to be located along the
eastern side of the newly proposed internal road. The bioswale is designed to capture, infiltrate,
treat and convey the surface storm water to the raingarden feature located within the proposed
Conservation area (see Appendix E). Both the bioswale and raingarden will consist of low
maintenance trees, shrubs and ground cover that will be compatible with frequent periods of wetted
-6 -
conditions. A Local Area Service (LAS) Bylaw will not be required for the bioswale or raingarden, as it
has been designed to be low maintenance. McKenney Creek, located on the northern property
boundary, requires a 30 m (98 ft.) setback from the top of bank. This setback area will be dedicated
back to the City as Conservation. Invasive species, such as Himalayan Blackberry, have been
identified on the subject property and will be removed as part of the enhancement and restoration
works, as well as the replanting of native grasses, shrubs and trees.
Interdepartmental Implications:
i)Engineering Department:
A Rezoning Servicing Agreement is not required for the subject application, as there are no off-site
works or services required. All deficient services will be provided through the Subdivision Servicing
Agreement at the time of subdivision.
Access to the Church parking lot from the new proposed road may occur in the future; however, in
order to do so, the Church will need to remove one of its two accesses currently located off 123
Avenue.
6)School District No. 42 Comments:
School District 42 has noted that the subject property falls within the Fairview Elementary and
Westview Secondary school catchment areas. Actual numbers for 2016 indicate that Fairview
Elementary is at 67% utilization, with 279 students. Secondary school enrollment numbers for 2016
indicate that Westview Secondary is at 64% utilization, with 765 students.
7)Intergovernmental Issues:
i)Local Government Act:
An amendment to the OCP requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to
adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 477 of the Local
Government Act. The amendment required for this application, to adjust the Conservation
boundaries around a watercourse, is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that
no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of
the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or
agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments.
-7 -
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that first and second reading be given to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7383-2017,
that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No.7193-2015, and that application 2015-
347-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing.
“Original signed by Adam Rieu”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adam Rieu
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7383-2017
Appendix D – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7193-2015
Appendix E – Proposed Subdivision Plan
DATE: Nov 17, 2015
FILE: 2015-347-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,000
20621 123 AVENUELegend
Stream
Ditch Centreline
Indefinite Creek
River Centreline
APPENDIX A
City of PittMeadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Nov 17, 2015
FILE: 2015-347-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,000
20621 123 AVENUE
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2011
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7383-2017
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014
_______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the
Official Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedules "B" & "C" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7383-2017
2.Schedule "B" is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 1 District Lot 276 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 80156
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 955, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby designated/amended as shown.
2.Schedule “C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 1 District Lot 276 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 80156
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 956, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation.
3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of ,20 .
___________________________________ _____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
205 ST.KL
A
S
S
E
N
P
L
.
123B AVE.ROAD125 AVE.
205 ST.206 ST.207A ST.124
A
A
V
E
.
124A AVE.
TYNER AVE.
125 AV
E
.KNOTTS ST.123B AVE.
123 AVE.208 ST.206 ST.205B ST.12374
12330
12269
12485
2055012405
205602057512259 2062112485
124
6
6
20621124621226520510 12511
20539124511236612434 2057520520205352051712461205552070912465
12270
12370
12260
1229012442
122581244620557
122542072912250
2057520560206492053012470
205851243012431
12475
12340
2049712400206302053512473
12518
2054212447
20785204932061612385
205162077012380
12477
1244512355 1241620506 12421124391246720565206392063420650206601226612437
20619205232071312427205811245612253124412048520516 2061012350
20512205712063812276 20797205682051812505
205162078012487
20545124451233512458 20597124552067012350
2051112315
12390
12495
12371 20685124382049820585205272051112431
205651239120624
12282
12500
122352053120508 122501247212358
20765
207882060720635205902059620538124501246412320
12399 2054512535
20491
12400
12365 124461227720591
2050312451
2054920492 1243612245
12488
1236020565 12512
12291 124652052220493
122792050912359
12406
205551241120489
20496206292053412271
12411
20779206221241020590206
7
5
2050212525
2060220484205192061320721206181224220532124541246820497207392051012480
1227620550
12250205562049812266
12283 1242612395
2052612476
12497
1232520515
20680
12345
2067920499 33
18
D
20
2
31
4
13
13
5
5
36
S 100' 5
7
15
6
5
Rem.
12
1
13
1
30
7
C
O
12
A
38
17
18
10
11
15
1
37
2
1911
J
8
Rem
13
24
15
1
17
2
15
9
36
15
24
15
2
19
34
35
22
N
18
6
12
4
7
33
35
19
4
14
20
3
30
11
3
21
7
19
4
115
Q
12
F
1
26
4
PARK
30
21
8
16
23
3
Rem 19
9
5
10
9
4
14
2
14
2
5
10
27
E
22
Rem 17
2
3
13
1
8
B
PARK
G
10
9
10
7
6
37
Rem 5
PARK
22
20
7
25
9
17
22
8
2
31
39
6 K
12
41
8
8
14
26
40
6
6
Rem
L
12
6
36
28
4
24
16
4
23
11
16
6
21
18
31
14
39
8
18
24
21
3
10
P
3
17
M
20
25
29
4
15
18
21
I
11
1
23
13
34
2
32
29
7
1
1 20
9
*
28
PARK
5
32
17
B
27
21
Rem 14
5
2
20
W 1/2 3
23
16
21
9
27
19
26
13
PARK
2
35
14
4
222
14
3
A
3
25
1
8
A
3
B
LMP 5840 P 77160LMP 27744P 76349P 13081 P 17921LMP 7351 P 77160P 25866
P 77017
P 17997P 25866
LMP
2
2
3
0
2
P 59478
LMP 53004
LMP 15767LMP 7229
P 85548
LMP
P 26346LMP 3146
LMP 22302
LMP
EPP 5093212426
P
5
9
4
7
8
P 11392
P 59478
P 77160
P 17921P 17997
P
5
9
4
7
8
P 74861LMP 11657
P 80156
LMP 12426 LMP 22302*PP118A
LMP
3
5
1
0
8 P 203751527
*
P
P
1
1
8
A
LMP 12298 P 77160LMP 6687
LMP 6687
P 17056
P 59478
12426
P 59478
P 75346
EPP 50932LMS
BCP
1
2
9
1
4
P 77160
P 65204
LMP 12298
BCP37
P 74861
P 77160P 74861
LMP 7642P 79594P 77160
LMP 42697
EPP 50931LMP 12298LMP 7015
LMP 27744
P 75346
EP 77161
EP 59492
EP 61394
EP 59493
EP
7
5
3
4
7
EPP 54835LMP 7526EP 77161RW 82431EP 59493
EP 77161EP 59493
EP
7
5
3
4
7
LMP 6729EP 77161 EP 59492EP
5
9
4
9
2
EP 77161
EP 59492
RW 82433EP 59493
EP 75347
EP 47468EP 59492EP 59492
LMP 322
6
7
EP
5
9
4
9
3
EP 59493
EPP 54835EP 77161
EP 59493
EP 59493
L
M
P
1
2
3
3
5
LMP 6857
L
M
P
4
2
6
9
8 EP 59479´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
Urban Residential
Conservation
7383-2017955
205 ST.KL
A
S
S
E
N
P
L
.
123B AVE.ROAD125 AVE.
205 ST.206 ST.207A ST.124
A
A
V
E
.
124A AVE.
TYNER AVE.
125 AV
E
.KNOTTS ST.123B AVE.
123 AVE.208 ST.206 ST.205B ST.12374
12330
12269
12485
2055012405
205602057512259 2062112485
124
6
6
20621124621226520510 12511
20539124511236612434 2057520520205352051712461205552070912465
12270
12370
12260
1229012442
122581244620557
122542072912250
2057520560206492053012470
205851243012431
12475
12340
2049712400206302053512473
12518
2054212447
20785204932061612385
205162077012380
12477
1244512355 1241620506 12421124391246720565206392063420650206601226612437
20619205232071312427205811245612253124412048520516 2061012350
20512205712063812276 20797205682051812505
205162078012487
20545124451233512458 20597124552067012350
2051112315
12390
12495
12371 20685124382049820585205272051112431
205651239120624
12282
12500
122352053120508 122501247212358
20765
207882060720635205902059620538124501246412320
12399 2054512535
20491
12400
12365 124461227720591
2050312451
2054920492 1243612245
12488
1236020565 12512
12291 124652052220493
122792050912359
12406
205551241120489
20496206292053412271
12411
20779206221241020590206
7
5
2050212525
2060220484205192061320721206181224220532124541246820497207392051012480
1227620550
12250205562049812266
12283 1242612395
2052612476
12497
1232520515
20680
12345
2067920499 33
18
D
20
2
31
4
13
13
5
5
36
S 100' 5
7
15
6
5
Rem.
12
1
13
1
30
7
C
O
12
A
38
17
18
10
11
15
1
37
2
1911
J
8
Rem
13
24
15
1
17
2
15
9
36
15
24
15
2
19
34
35
22
N
18
6
12
4
7
33
35
19
4
14
20
3
30
11
3
21
7
19
4
115
Q
12
F
1
26
4
PARK
30
21
8
16
23
3
Rem 19
9
5
10
9
4
14
2
14
2
5
10
27
E
22
Rem 17
2
3
13
1
8
B
PARK
G
10
9
10
7
6
37
Rem 5
PARK
22
20
7
25
9
17
22
8
2
31
39
6 K
12
41
8
8
14
26
40
6
6
Rem
L
12
6
36
28
4
24
16
4
23
11
16
6
21
18
31
14
39
8
18
24
21
3
10
P
3
17
M
20
25
29
4
15
18
21
I
11
1
23
13
34
2
32
29
7
1
1 20
9
*
28
PARK
5
32
17
B
27
21
Rem 14
5
2
20
W 1/2 3
23
16
21
9
27
19
26
13
PARK
2
35
14
4
222
14
3
A
3
25
1
8
A
3
B
LMP 5840 P 77160LMP 27744P 76349P 13081 P 17921LMP 7351 P 77160P 25866
P 77017
P 17997P 25866
LMP
2
2
3
0
2
P 59478
LMP 53004
LMP 15767LMP 7229
P 85548
LMP
P 26346LMP 3146
LMP 22302
LMP
EPP 5093212426
P
5
9
4
7
8
P 11392
P 59478
P 77160
P 17921P 17997
P
5
9
4
7
8
P 74861LMP 11657
P 80156
LMP 12426 LMP 22302*PP118A
LMP
3
5
1
0
8 P 203751527
*
P
P
1
1
8
A
LMP 12298 P 77160LMP 6687
LMP 6687
P 17056
P 59478
12426
P 59478
P 75346
EPP 50932LMS
BCP
1
2
9
1
4
P 77160
P 65204
LMP 12298
BCP37
P 74861
P 77160P 74861
LMP 7642P 79594P 77160
LMP 42697
EPP 50931LMP 12298LMP 7015
LMP 27744
P 75346
EP 77161
EP 59492
EP 61394
EP 59493
EP
7
5
3
4
7
EPP 54835LMP 7526EP 77161RW 82431EP 59493
EP 77161EP 59493
EP
7
5
3
4
7
LMP 6729EP 77161 EP 59492EP
5
9
4
9
2
EP 77161
EP 59492
RW 82433EP 59493
EP 75347
EP 47468EP 59492EP 59492
LMP 322
6
7
EP
5
9
4
9
3
EP 59493
EPP 54835EP 77161
EP 59493
EP 59493
L
M
P
1
2
3
3
5
LMP 6857
L
M
P
4
2
6
9
8 EP 59479´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose: To Amend Schedule C as shown
Add to Conservation
7383-2017956
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7193-2015
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7193-2015."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 District Lot 276 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 80156
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1651 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium
Density) Residential).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 12th day of January, 2016.
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX D
205 ST.KL
A
S
S
E
N
P
L
.
123B AVE.ROAD125 AVE.206 ST.207A ST.124
A
A
V
E
.
124A AVE.
125 AV
E
.
123 AVE.
12374
12269
12330
20550205601225920575 2062112485
124
6
6
206211246212265205102053912366124342057520520205352051720555 12270
12370
1229012442
122581244620557122502056020530 12470
205851243012431
12340 12400206302053512473
2061612385
2051612380
12477
1244512355 12416124391242120506
20565206392063412266206502066012437207131242720523124561225312441206102051612350205122063812276205681248720545124451233520597124582067012350
12315
12390
1237112438
205852052720511205652062412282
12500
2053112250
12358
207652060720635
205902059620538124501246412320
12399 2054512365 12446122772059112451
205491243612488
1236020565 12512
12291 1246512279
12359
12406
2055512411122712062220590206
7
5
124102060220613
207212061820532124542073912480
122762055020556
12266
12283 124262052612476
12497
123252051512345
33
18
D
2
31
13
13
5
5
S 100' 5
15
6
12
1
13
1
7
C
12
A
38
17
18
10
11
15
2J
8
Rem
13
24
17
1
2
24
2
19
34
18
6
12
4
7
33
35
14
20
3
30
11
3
21
7
19
4
115
12
F
1
4
30
16
23
Rem 19
5
10
9
4
2
14
10
E
Rem 17
3
8
PARK
G
10
9
37
Rem 5
22
7
17
8
31
39
K
41
14
26
40
L
12
6
36
28
16
4
23
11
16
6
39
8
24
21
3
10
25
29
15
18
21
I
11
1
34
2
32
29
1
1 20
9
*
28
PARK
5
32
17
B
27
Rem 14
20
W 1/2 3
23
16
9
27
26
2
4
222
A
25
1
3
B
LMP 5840 P 77160LMP 27744
P 13081
LMP 7351 P 77160P 25866
P 17997P 25866
LMP
2
2
3
0
2
P 59478
LMP 53004
LMP 15767LMP 7229
P 85548
LMP 3146
LMP 22302
LMP
P
5
9
4
7
8
12426
P 11392
P 59478
P 77160
P 17921P 17997 P 59478P 80156
*PP118A
1527
*
P
P
1
1
8
A
LMP 12298 P 77160LMP 6687
P 59478
P 17056
P 75346
EPP 50932LMS
P 77160
LMP 12298
P 77160LMP 7642P 79594P 77160
LMP 42697
LMP 7015
EP 77161
EP 59492
EP 59493
EP
7
5
3
4
7
EPP 54835EP 77161RW 82431EP 59493
EP 77161EP
7
5
3
4
7
LMP 6729EP 77161 EP 59492EP
5
9
4
9
2
EP 77161
EP 59492
EP 59493
RW 82433EP 59492
EP
5
9
4
9
3
EP 59493
EPP 54835EP 77161
EP 59493
LMP 6857
L
M
P
4
2
6
9
8 EP 59479´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-3 (One Family Suburban Residential)
RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential)
7193-20151651
APPENDIX E
-1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2016-336-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7396-2017;
Second Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7287-2016;
11300 & 11250 240 Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject properties located at 11300 240 and 11250
240 Street from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and R-2
(Urban Residential District), to permit a future subdivision of 5 lots and the future construction of a
54 unit Townhouse Development. Council granted first reading to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7287-
2016 and considered the early consultation requirements for the Official Community Plan (OCP)
amendment on October 25, 2016. The minimum lot size for the current RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) zone is 8000 m2 where community water is provided.
The proposed R-2 (Urban Residential District) and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zoning complies
with the policies of the Official Community Plan (OCP). However, an amendment to the OCP is
required to amend the Conservation boundary.
1)That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act, opportunity for early and
on-going consultation has been provided by way of posting Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7396-2017 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a
Development Information Meeting (DIM), and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any
further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw;
2)That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7396-2017 be considered in conjunction with
the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
3)That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7396-2017 is consistent
with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
4)That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7396-2017 be given first and second
readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
5)That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7287-2016 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public
Hearing;
6)That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i)Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of
the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;
1105
- 2 -
ii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan,
Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan, Figure 1: and Schedule “C”
iii) Road dedication and lane dedication as required;
iv) Trail construction as required.
v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the
suitability of the subject properties for the proposed development;
vi) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the protection of the Environmentally Sensitive
land on the subject properties;
vii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for protecting the Visitor Parking;
viii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management;
ix) Notification to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Ministry of Environment for
in-stream works on the site;
x) That a voluntary contribution, in the amount of $246,900.00 ($5,100.00/lot plus
$4,100.00/unit) be provided in keeping with the Council Policy with regard to Community
Amenity Contributions.
xi) That an additional Amenity Contribution for density bonus in the RM-1 Townhouse Zone be
provided in the amount of $3,100.00 per unit, for a total of $167,400.00.
DISCUSSION:
1) Background Context:
Applicant: Cipe Homes Inc.
Legal Description: Lot: 1, Section: 15, Township: 12, Plan: NWP22347 & Lot: 2,
Section: 15, Township: 12, Plan: NWP22347
OCP:
Existing: MRES (Medium Density Residential), CONSRV (Conservation)
Proposed: Medium Density Residential
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Proposed: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential), R-2 (Urban Residential District)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Urban Residential
Zone: R-1 (Residential District)
Designation: Medium Density Residential (Albion Area Plan)
South: Use: Vacant
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and
Conservation (Albion Area Plan)
- 3 -
East: Use: Vacant
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and
Conservation (Albion Area Plan).
West: Use: Townhouse Residential
Zone: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: Townhouse and Single Family Residential
Site Area: 0.778 HA. (2 acres)
Access: 240th Street
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
2) Background:
The site is within the Albion Area Plan and is located along a major arterial road (240 th Street). A
watercourse (Seigel Creek) traverses the site along its eastern edge. Environmentally sensitive
portions of the site are to be dedicated as a condition of rezoning.
3) Project Description:
This residential development proposal combines 5 smaller lot single family housing forms at the
north edge of the site with ground oriented townhouse (54 units) for the remainder of the site. This
proposal is generally consistent with the land use designation of the site. In addition, the smaller lot
single family lots offer a transition between the single family development to the north of the site and
the proposed townhouse development.
4) Planning Analysis:
Official Community Plan:
The development site is located within the Albion Area Plan and is designated Medium Density
Residential and Conservation. For the proposed development an OCP amendment is required to
adjust the site’s conservation boundaries. A number of residential zones align with the Medium
Density Residential District, including both of the proposed zones (RM-1 Townhouse Residential and
R-2 Urban Residential District). For this reason, this proposal is consistent with the Official
Community Plan.
The setback area along Seigel Creek will trigger requirements for restoration and enhancement
works that will need to be addressed with the Watercourse Protection Development Permit that will
be required as part of this development.
Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 11300 & 11250 240th Street
from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and R-2 (Urban
Residential District) Minimum parcel size for the current RS-3 One Family Rural Residential zone is
0.8 hectares (2 acres) if connected to municipal water, and the minimum lot size for the proposed R-
2 (Urban Residential District) zone is 315 m2. The minimum lot size for the proposed RM-1
- 4 -
(Townhouse Residential) Zone is 557 m2. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed
zones will require a Development Variance Permit application.
The proposed density of the townhouse portion of the site will exceed the 0.6 FSR maximum in the
RM-1 Zone. However, the site is within the Albion Area and therefore may utilize density bonus
provisions, to a maximum of 0.75 FSR. The additional Amenity Contribution for this density bonus is
$3,100.00 per unit, which for 54 units, will amount to $167,400.00. This fee will be in addition to
the $3,100.00 per unit Amenity Contribution charges.
i) Off-Street Parking And Loading Bylaw:
The R-2 (Urban Residential District) Zone has a required parking compliment of 2 stalls per dwelling
unit. Parking for the single family portion of this development will be addressed as part of the
required building permit after subdivision occurs.
The proposed RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) Zone has a required compliment of 2 stalls per dwelling
unit and an additional 0.2 stalls per unit for visitor parking. Most of the required residential parking
will be accommodated in double car garages, with 5 of the townhouse units proposed to have
tandem parking. A total of 108 stalls is required for resident parking. Required visitor parking is
provided throughout the site with 6 regular stalls, 2 accessible stalls, and 3 small car stalls. A total
of 11 visitor stalls are provided. These parking provisions meet the requirements of the bylaw.
ii) Proposed Variances:
A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves the
following relaxations (see Appendix D):
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985,
The following variances will be required:
Front yard setback from 7.5 to 4.5 metres
Rear yard setback from 7.5 to 5.0 metres
Side yard setback (north side) from 7.5 to 4.0 metres
Side yard setback (south side) from 7.5 to 6.0 metres
The requested variances to the RM-1 Townhouse Residential Zone will be the subject of a future
Council report.
iii) Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the OCP, a Multi-Family Development Permit application is required to
ensure the current townhouse proposal enhances existing neighbourhoods with compatible housing
styles that meet diverse needs, and minimize potential conflicts with neighbouring land uses.
Council will have the opportunity to review these details further in their consideration of the
Development Permit.
In addition, pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit
application is required to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of
watercourse and riparian areas. A Natural Features Development Permit application is also
required, pursuant to Section 8.10 of the OCP for all development and subdivision activity or building
permits for:
- 5 -
All areas designated Conservation on Schedule “B” or all areas within 50 metres of
an area designated Conservation on Schedule “B”, or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the
Silver Valley Area Plan;
All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent;
All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Schedule “C”
to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural
environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions.
iv) Advisory Design Panel:
The Advisory Design Panel (ADP) reviewed the form and character of the proposed development and
the landscaping plans at a meeting held on June 13, 2017. Following presentations by the project
Architect and Landscape Architect, the ADP made the following resolution that:
That the application be supported and the following concerns be addressed as the design
develops and be submitted to Planning staff for follow-up:
1. Consider reducing the use of vinyl, particularly at ground level;
2. Provide postal kiosk details, including garbage and recycling amenities. Provide a
parking space close to mail box that does not require backing out. Connect directly
to kiosk with paving;
3. Provide alternate road surface, especially at internal intersection;
4. Provide accessible connectivity to and from handicap parking stalls;
5. Substitute a few of the Maple species with other species; and
6. Provide a thematic gateway element at the entrance to the development.
The ADP concerns have been addressed and are reflected in the current plans. A detailed
description of how these items were incorporated into the final design will be included in a future
development permit report to Council.
v) Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting was held at Kanaka Creek Elementary School on May 24, 2017.
A total of 3 people attended the meeting. A summary of the main comments and discussions with
the attendees was provided by the applicant and include the following main points:
Need for improved bike lanes
Better pedestrian connectivity
The following is provided in response to the issues raised by the public:
Comments received were not directly applicable to the applicant’s proposal.
vi) Parkland Requirement:
For this project, there is sufficient land that is proposed to be dedicated as park on the subject
properties and this land will be required to be dedicated as a condition of Final Reading.
- 6 -
5) Environmental Implications:
Environmentally sensitive portions of the site include the watercourse and steep slopes on the
northeast portion of the site. The development layout reflects these site constraints. A reduction in
stream setback area from 30 to 22.5 metres will be compensated for by instream habitat
complexing and offsite habitat improvements including the removal of invasive species.
6) Interdepartmental Implications:
i) Engineering Department:
Engineering Comments focused on the required road dedication, and improvements required along
240th Street, including widening to support construction of a left turn lane at the intersection along
112th Avenue. Additional works will be required as a condition of subdivision for the single family
development.
ii) Parks & Leisure Services Department:
A multi use path will be required along 240th Street. In addition, the applicant is to provide a publicly
accessible trail within the park dedication on the east side of the site which will be connected to
112th Ave with future developments. The location of the trail will be situated in order to protect
significant trees and watercourses and avoid disturbances to existing grades. At least two
pedestrian connections into the townhome development to access the trail are to be provided.
iii) License, Permits and Bylaws Department:
Referrals have been made for the required development permit and development variance permit.
Comments received will be reflected in the reports accompanying those applications.
iv) Fire Department:
Comments focused on the need for a fire safety plan, for address visibility, and for appropriate
handling of existing structures prior to demolition.
7) Intergovernmental Issues:
i) Local Government Act:
An amendment to the OCP requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to
adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 477 of the Local
Government Act. The amendment required for this application, to conservation boundaries, is
considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond
existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council
of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and
Provincial Governments.
The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste
Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact.
- 7 -
8) Citizen/Customer Implications:
A Development Information Meeting has been provided previously by the applicant. Additional
opportunities for public input will be provided through the required notification process for the
Development Variance Permit and for the required Public hearing as part of this rezoning application.
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that first and second reading be given to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7396-2017,
that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7287-2017, and that application 2016-
336-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing.
“Original signed by Diana Hall”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Diana Hall M.A. MCIP, RPP
Planner 2
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7396-2017
Appendix D – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7287-2016
Appendix E – Subdivision Plan
Appendix F – Streetscapes
Appendix G –Landscape Plan
DATE: Sep 1, 2016
FILE: 2016-336-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
´
Scale: 1:3,000
11250 & 11300 240 STREETLegend
Stream
Ditch Centreline
Edge of Marsh
Indefinite Creek
River Centreline
Lake or Reservoir
Marsh
APPENDIX A
City of PittMeadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER
R
.
^
DATE: Sep 1, 2016
FILE: 2016-336-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
´
Scale: 1:3,000
11250 & 11300 240 STREET
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2015
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7396-2017
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014
___________________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official
Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedules "A" & "C" to the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7396-2017."
2. Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan, Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan is hereby
amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 Section 15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 22347
Lot 2 Section 15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 22347
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 958, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this bylaw, are hereby designated as shown.
3.Schedule “C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 1 Section 15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 22347
Lot 2 Section 15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 22347
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 959, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adding Conservation.
4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20 .
READ a second time the day of , 20 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 .
READ a third time the day of , 20 .
ADOPTED the day of , 20 .
_____________________________________ _____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
EPP 25280BCP 20581
EPP 45971BCP 22866
EPP 71011
EP
P
3
5
7
4
3
EPP 32538
BCP20581
BCP 20582BCP 20582EPP 36439EPP 35743EPP 35743EPP 35743EPP 25283
EPP 25280
EPP 40982BCP 20581
BCP 22864EPP 37716LMP 28831EPP 45971 EPP 32519EPP 40843
112 AVE.241A ST.113A AVE.
KANAKA WAY 240 ST.240A ST.112 AVE.112 AVE.
11189
11318
2393611181
11312
1118124035
11183
11381
241702390723915240302395311195
23906239501135
8
11316
1134
6
11
3
9
3
11340
11303
11357
11300
11369
11345
2395811372
11387
1130611302
11332
11356
2394211325
11372
11350
11386
2398011360
11386
11355
11169
11363
11379
2394511305
11177 11175
11362
11187
11167 2413311187
11175
11370
11163
11373
2396211333
2392511382
1116923928113
5
2
2391611376
11195
11320 pump sta.
11225
11338
11310
11326
11166
11315
11336
2393511328
11363
11378
11173
113
6
6
11321
11250
A
PARK
19
2
13
26
1
7
19
4
8
9
22
2
Rem 1
9
5
29
B
32
36
24
B
27 20
308
38
4
21
1
32
23
35
34
23
PARK
3
15
1
33
3
2
28
PARK
25
5
22
17
21
Pcl. 1
21
16
33
28
20
10
2
4
24
11
25
14
31
3
22
29
31
34
6
18
27
5
PARK
37
6
26
30
6 12
P 3452
EPP 25279
BCP 20580
NWP5589BCP 22865EPP 32520
(EPS 2572)
EPP 25279 BCP 15941BCP 20580BCP 22865BCP 20580BCP 20580RP 6761
EPP 25279
RP 6260
EPP 32520 P 22347BCP 15941
BCP 20580LMP 31331
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose From:
To:
To Amend Albion Area Plan Schedule 1Medium Density Residential
Conservation
7396-2017958
EPP 25280BCP 20581
EPP 45971BCP 22866
EPP 71011
EP
P
3
5
7
4
3
EPP 32538
BCP20581
BCP 20582BCP 20582EPP 36439EPP 35743EPP 35743EPP 35743EPP 25283
EPP 25280
EPP 40982BCP 20581
BCP 22864EPP 37716LMP 28831EPP 45971 EPP 32519EPP 40843
112 AVE.241A ST.113A AVE.
KANAKA WAY 240 ST.240A ST.112 AVE.112 AVE.
11189
11318
2393611181
11312
1118124035
11183
11381
241702390723915240302395311195
23906239501135
8
11316
1134
6
11
3
9
3
11340
11303
11357
11300
11369
11345
2395811372
11387
1130611302
11332
11356
2394211325
11372
11350
11386
2398011360
11386
11355
11169
11363
11379
2394511305
11177 11175
11362
11187
11167 2413311187
11175
11370
11163
11373
2396211333
2392511382
1116923928113
5
2
2391611376
11195
11320 pump sta.
11225
11338
11310
11326
11166
11315
11336
2393511328
11363
11378
11173
113
6
6
11321
11250
A
PARK
19
2
13
26
1
7
19
4
8
9
22
2
Rem 1
9
5
29
B
32
36
24
B
27 20
308
38
4
21
1
32
23
35
34
23
PARK
3
15
1
33
3
2
28
PARK
25
5
22
17
21
Pcl. 1
21
16
33
28
20
10
2
4
24
11
25
14
31
3
22
29
31
34
6
18
27
5
PARK
37
6
26
30
6 12
P 3452
EPP 25279
BCP 20580
NWP5589BCP 22865EPP 32520
(EPS 2572)
EPP 25279 BCP 15941BCP 20580BCP 22865BCP 20580BCP 20580RP 6761
EPP 25279
RP 6260
EPP 32520 P 22347BCP 15941
BCP 20580LMP 31331
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose To amend Schedule C as shown
To Add to Conservation
7396-2017959
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7287-2016
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7287-2016."
2.Those parcel (s) or tract (s) of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 1 Section 15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 22347
Lot 2 Section 15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 22347
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1696 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RM-1 (Townhouse Residential),
R-2 (Urban Residential District).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 25th day of October, 2016.
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX D
EPP 25280BCP 20581
EPP 45971BCP 22866
EPP 71011
EP
P
3
5
7
4
3
EPP 32538
BCP20581
BCP 20582BCP 20582EPP 36439EPP 35743EPP 35743EPP 35743EPP 25283
EPP 25280
EPP 40982BCP 20581
BCP 22864EPP 37716LMP 28831EPP 45971 EPP 32519EPP 40843
112 AVE.241A ST.113A AVE.
KANAKA WAY 240 ST.240A ST.112 AVE.112 AVE.
11189
11318
2393611181
11312
1118124035
11183
11381
241702390723915240302395311195
23906239501135
8
11316
1134
6
11
3
9
3
11340
11303
11357
11300
11369
11345
2395811372
11387
1130611302
11332
11356
2394211325
11372
11350
11386
2398011360
11386
11355
11169
11363
11379
2394511305
11177 11175
11362
11187
11167 2413311187
11175
11370
11163
11373
2396211333
2392511382
1116923928113
5
2
2391611376
11195
11320 pump sta.
11225
11338
11310
11326
11166
11315
11336
2393511328
11363
11378
11173
113
6
6
11321
11250
A
PARK
19
2
13
26
1
7
19
4
8
9
22
2
Rem 1
9
5
29
B
32
36
24
B
27 20
308
38
4
21
1
32
23
35
34
23
PARK
3
15
1
33
3
2
28
PARK
25
5
22
17
21
Pcl. 1
21
16
33
28
20
10
2
4
24
11
25
14
31
3
22
29
31
34
6
18
27
5
PARK
37
6
26
30
6 12
P 3452
EPP 25279
BCP 20580
NWP5589BCP 22865EPP 32520
(EPS 2572)
EPP 25279 BCP 15941BCP 20580BCP 22865BCP 20580BCP 20580RP 6761
EPP 25279
RP 6260
EPP 32520 P 22347BCP 15941
BCP 20580LMP 31331
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
RM-1 (Townhouse Residential)R-2 (Urban Residential District)
7287-20161696
Site Plan
APPENDIX E
Streetscapes
APPENDIX F
Landscape Plan APPENDIX G
-1 -
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-291-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: First and Second Reading
Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7369-2017 and
First and Second Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7364-2017
24093 and 24137 104 Avenue and PID 009-437-061
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the three subject properties, located at 24093 and
24137 104 Avenue and Parcel Identifier (PID) 009-437-061, from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to P-1 (Park and School) (see Appendices A
and B). The Board of Education of School District 42 (the School District) entered into a Joint
Acquisition Agreement with the City of Maple Ridge (the City) to facilitate the co-location and joint
development of an Elementary School and Community Centre. The proposed zoning to P-1 (Park and
School) will allow for the development of the new Albion Elementary School and Albion Community
Centre. The three subject properties will be consolidated as part of rezoning conditions and then
subdivided into the School District-owned Elementary School and the City-owned Community Centre.
A Shared Use Agreement will be implemented between the School District and the City for facility
programming, playfield use, trail networks, storage, and infrastructure requirements. A Cross Access
Agreement and Reciprocal Statutory Right-of-Way will be required as a condition of rezoning to allow
for the full movement of vehicles and parking between the facilities.
This application requires an amendment to the Official Community Plan (OCP) to re-designate one of
the three subject properties (24093 104 Avenue) from Medium Density Residential to Institutional.
The other two subject properties are already designated as Institutional for the proposed uses. The
area around the tributary to Spencer Creek will also be re-designated as Conservation. A text
amendment is required to the Zoning Bylaw to add ‘community centre’ as one of the permitted uses
to the ‘Assembly Use’ definition.
As per Council Policy 6.31, Community Amenity Contributions are not required for this application, as
it is not for residential development.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1)That, in accordance with Section 475 of the Local Government Act, Council has considered and
provided opportunity for early and on-going consultation by way of posting Official Community
Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7369-2017 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant
host a Development Information Meeting (DIM), and Council considers it unnecessary to provide
any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a Public Hearing on the bylaw;
2)That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7369-2017 be considered in conjunction with
the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
1106
- 2 -
3) That it be confirmed that Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7369-2017 is consistent
with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan;
4) That Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 7369-2017 be given first and second
readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing;
5) That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7364-2017 be given first and second readings, and be
forwarded to Public Hearing;
6) That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i) Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of
the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;
ii) Amendment to Official Community Plan Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan,
Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan, Figure 1: Northeast Albion and Schedule “C”;
iii) Park dedication as required, including construction of walkways and trails; and removal of
all debris and garbage from park land;
iv) Consolidation of the subject properties;
v) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Geotechnical Report, which addresses the
suitability of the subject properties for the proposed development;
vi) Registration of a Reciprocal Statutory Right-of-Way Agreement for shared parking;
vii) Registration of a Reciprocal Cross Access Easement Agreement;
viii) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Tree Protection;
ix) Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for Stormwater Management;
x) Submission of a Traffic Impact Study Report and approval of the report from the
Engineering Department;
xi) Removal of existing buildings;
xii) A Water Supply Operating Permit from Fraser Health will be required for any water supply
system serving everything other than a single family dwelling;
xiii) A Professional Engineer’s certification that adequate water quantity for domestic and fire
protection purposes can be provided; and
xiv) In addition to the site profile, a disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional
Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks on the
subject properties. If so, a Stage 1 Site Investigation Report is required to ensure that the
subject property is not a contaminated site.
- 3 -
DISCUSSION:
1) Background Context:
Applicant: Craven Huston Powers Architects
Legal Descriptions: Lot 3 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan
10921;
Lot 4 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan
10921; and
Lot 9 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan
14750
OCP:
Existing: Medium Density Residential and Institutional
Proposed: Institutional
Zoning:
Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family
Suburban Residential)
Proposed: P-1 (Park and School)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Vacant
Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) and
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Conservation, Medium Density Residential, Institutional
South: Use: Single Family Residential and Vacant
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), RM-1 (Townhouse
Residential), RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential), R-3 (Special
Amenity Residential District)
Designation: Medium Density Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Designation: Medium Density Residential and Conservation
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)
Designation: Medium Density Residential and Conservation
Existing Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: Elementary School and Community Centre
Site Area: 4.1 ha (10.1 acres)
Access: 104 Avenue
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
2) Project Description:
The subject properties, located at 24093 and 24197 104 Avenue and PID 009-437-064, are located
on the north side of 104 Avenue, east of 240 Street and are surrounded by single family lots to the
- 4 -
east and west, 104 Avenue to the south, and vacant City-owned property (Conservation and
Institutional) to the north (see Appendix A). The three subject properties are a combined 4.1 ha (10
acres) in size. The two western properties are currently vacant, while the property at 24137 104
Avenue has an existing house that will require removal as a condition of final reading. The subject
properties have a significant amount of vegetation located across the properties, with steep slopes
located on both the western and eastern property boundaries. A tributary to Spencer Creek
originates on the eastern-most property and runs north to the mainstem of Spencer Creek (see
Appendix B). The area around this tributary will be dedicated back to the City as Conservation (see
Appendix C).
The current application is proposing to rezone the subject properties from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to P-1 (Park and School) to permit the
construction of an Elementary School and Community Centre (see Appendix D). The School District
and the City have entered into a Joint Acquisition Agreement to facilitate the development of the
subject properties. Shared use agreements will be implemented for joint facility programming,
playfield use, trail networks, storage, and infrastructure requirements. A Cross Access Agreement
will be required as part of the rezoning conditions to allow for the movement of vehicles between
each facility for access and egress from each site. A Reciprocal Statutory Right-of-Way will be
required for the shared parking between each facility.
Once the subject properties are rezoned and consolidated, a subdivision application will be required
to create the two lots, consisting of the School District-owned Elementary School and the City -owned
Community Centre. The proposed Elementary School will be located centrally on the site with a lot
size of approximately 2.7 ha (6.6 acres). The site will consist of an Elementary School with a gross
floor area of approximately 5,147 m² (55,403 ft²). A full-size playfield will be located in the
northwest corner of the school site; a looping trail for student use with a future connection to the trail
network near Spencer Creek; and parking for 55 vehicles, combined with the Community Centre’s 86
proposed parking stalls for a total of 141 parking stalls.
The proposed Elementary School (see Appendix E) is designed to incorporate a 21st century learning
environment consisting of a ‘Pod concept’ of communal learning and access to indoor/outdoor
classrooms. In addition, an Environmental Pod will showcase some of the school’s sustainability
features to include: solar panels; windows with actuators for optimal heating and cooling;
stormwater/rainwater harvesting, which will help to recharge the tributary to Spencer Creek; and an
internal LED display identifying the various features, such as energy gains and temperature. The
school’s aesthetics will consist of wood-frame construction throughout (see Appendix F). The gym
has been designed with aboriginal input providing a traditional longhouse column and beam
structure. Efficient window placement near the roof line will allow natural light in and reduce the
need for artificial lighting. Natural play areas will be incorporated into the landscape plan and will
consist of permeable surfaces (see Appendix G).
The proposed Community Centre will be located in the southeast corner of the subject properties,
with a lot size of approximately 0.76 ha (1.9 acres). The site will consist of one building with a gross
floor area of approximately 1,686 m² (18,148 ft²). The concept for the Community Centre will have a
focus on the performing arts and local theatre, and anticipates a small indoor and outdoor
amphitheater and stage. The Community Centre will provide services for all ages from infants to
seniors, but will have an emphasis on school-age children and youth. The building will be designed
to work with the natural environment and incorporate view corridors to the local landscape and
natural topography. The community consultation portion of the project for the Community Centre
has been completed in terms of design; however, it is now up to the Architect to design the building
- 5 -
based on the community input. The Parks, Recreation and Culture Department will be working with
Council to complete the Community Centre portion of the project.
3) Planning Analysis:
i) Official Community Plan:
The three subject properties are within the Albion Area Plan. The properties located at 24137 104
Avenue and PID 009-437-061 are designated Institutional in the OCP, and the property located at
24093 104 Avenue is designated Medium Density Residential. The property designated Medium
Density Residential will require an OCP amendment to Institutional to align with the proposed
rezoning to P-1 (Park and School). The area around the tributary to Spencer Creek will also be re-
designated as Conservation.
The Institutional designation applies to diverse uses that meet specific community needs. The re-
designation for this development is supportable based on the following principles and policies within
the OCP:
Principle 4: The community recognizes that components of the built and natural environments
contribute to the character of Maple Ridge and sense of community, and in turn,
‘placemaking’;
Principle 36: Integrating growth with services, infrastructure, and schools is desirable for the
future of Maple Ridge.
Principle 38: Expanding services concurrently with development is regarded by the community as
good planning and development practice.
Policy 4-5: Maple Ridge supports the cooperative and community use of facilities belonging to
the Municipality, School District, local churches and other agencies; as
neighbourhood centres for gatherings; accessing educational, recreational, leisure
and volunteer opportunities; and promoting capacity building and leadership
development in the community.
Policy 4-7: Maple Ridge supports the provision of both public and private education facilities to
serve a broad range of interests, educational needs and age groups. Maple Ridge
will locate community level and neighbourhood level parks adjacent to secondary
schools and elementary schools, wherever possible.
Policy 4-31: Small scale or locally serving institutional facilities that can be located throughout
the community include: schools, community halls, parks and recreation facilities,
museums, firehalls, and places of worship. These uses will be permitted in rural and
urban areas subject to parking requirements, access, compliance with zoning
bylaws, and compatibility with adjacent land uses.
Policy 4-37: To meet the needs of a growing and changing population, appropriate facilities and
services will be planned in consultation with Provincial and Regional agencies and
authorities, including the Fraser Health Region.
- 6 -
ii) Zoning Bylaw:
The current application proposes to rezone the subject properties from RS-3 (One Family Rural
Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to P-1 (Park and School) to permit the
development of a new Elementary School and Community Centre. The subject properties will be
consolidated as a condition of rezoning and subdivided for a School District-owned Elementary
School and a City-owned Community Centre. The minimum lot size for the current RS-3 (One Family
Rural Residential) zone is 0.80 ha (2 acres) and minimum lot size for the RS-2 (One Family Suburban
Residential) zone is 0.40 ha (1 acre); there is no minimum lot size for the P-1 (Park and School)
zone. The applicant will be seeking a text amendment to the Zoning Bylaw definition for ‘Assembly
Use’ to include ‘community centre’ as one of the permitted uses.
iii) Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw:
The Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990 requires 1 stall per 93m² gross floor area
for public schools and 1 stall per 20m² gross floor area for assembly use (the Community Centre).
The applicant is providing 56 parking stalls for the proposed Elementary School and 85 parking
stalls for the proposed Community Centre, for a total of 141 parking stalls. Both uses meet the Off-
Street Parking and Loading Bylaw minimum requirements. Two of the stalls will be identified as
accessible parking for the Community Centre and one stall for accessible parking at the Elementary
School. A Reciprocal Statutory Right-of-Way will be registered between the School District and the
City to allow the various users to park at either facility. A Cross Access Easement will be registered
to allow the full movement of vehicles between each facility for access and egress.
iv) Proposed Variances:
A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves the
following relaxations:
To reduce the side yard setback from 7.5m (24 ft.) to 1.0m (3 ft.); and
To increase the maximum retaining wall height from 1.2m (4 ft.) to 2.8m (9 ft.).
The requested variances to the P-1 (Park and School) zone will be the subject of a future Council
report.
v) Development Permits:
A Form and Character Development Permit is not required for Institutional developments; however, a
Watercourse Protection and Natural Features Development Permit are required, as outlined below.
Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the OCP, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is
required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top of bank of all
watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit is to
ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian
areas.
Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the OCP, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required
for all development and subdivision activity or building permits for:
- 7 -
All areas designated Conservation on Schedule “B” or all areas within 50 metres of an
area designated Conservation on Schedule “B”, or on Figures 2, 3 and 4 in the Silver
Valley Area Plan;
All lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent;
All floodplain areas and forest lands identified on Schedule “C”.
to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and
for development that is protected from hazardous conditions.
vi) Advisory Design Panel:
A Development Permit is not required for Institutional developments; therefore, the project did not
have to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel prior to second reading. However, the applicant
did submit design drawings to the Advisory Design Panel for preliminary comments in an effort to
improve the design. The ADP recommendations have been considered and are reflected in the
current plans.
vii) Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting was held at Alexander Robinson Elementary School on
September 21, 2017. Seven people attended the meeting. A summary of the main comments and
discussions with the attendees was provided by the applicant and include the following main points:
Clarification on the catchment area for the proposed school; and
Concern about the speed of vehicles travelling along 104 Avenue.
The applicant provided the following response to the issues raised by the public:
The catchment area for Albion area schools will be conducted by the School District and
determined in the Fall of 2018; and
Enforcement of the speed limit does not fall within the jurisdiction of the School District.
Comments have been forwarded to the Engineering Department.
4) Environmental Implications:
The applicant has submitted an Environmental Assessment prepared by Environmental Dynamics
Inc. (EDI). EDI have also worked with the Environment Section of the Planning Department to identify
the Conservation boundary around the tributary to Spencer Creek. The proposed setbacks from the
top of bank are between 22.5m (74 ft.) and 30m (98 ft.). The reduced setback (less than 30m)
areas are located on the western section of the riparian area adjacent to the Elementary School, and
the southeast section of the riparian area adjacent to the Community Centre (see Appendix E). In
order to compensate for the encroachment into the 30m setback and subsequent loss of habitat,
the applicant has provided compensation, to include:
Protection of a greater amount of comparable habitat on-site; and
Additional restoration works along the mainstem of Spencer Creek, located on the northern
City-owned property;
The applicant has provided a Tree Management Report, prepared by Arbortech Consulting, to ensure
appropriate retention and compensation is provided for the trees on-site. Steep slopes have been
identified on the western and eastern property boundaries. The site will require portions of the
- 8 -
property to be supported through retaining wall structures, specifically around the playfield location
and the western property boundary (see Appendix E). Any retaining walls exceeding 1.2m (4 ft.) in
height will be the subject of a future Development Variance Permit report to Council. Stormwater
management features will include raingardens and bioswales to capture stormwater from
impervious areas and redirect the runoff to the tributary of Spencer Creek. These stormwater
features also have the ability to create wildlife habitat and educational opportunities for the
students.
5) Interdepartmental Implications:
i) Engineering Department:
Concrete curb and gutters will be required along the north side of 104 Avenue. Sidewalks will be
required on the north side of 104 Avenue and will consist of a 3m (10 ft.) multi-use path. The
sidewalk will be constructed west of the school to the intersection of 104 Avenue and 240 Street, as
well as east of the school, to connect with the existing sidewalk at 24225 104 Avenue. Street trees
and street lights are required across the frontage of the subject properties to the collector road
standard. The subject properties are situated within an area currently not serviced with municipal
sanitary sewer. To service the site, a sanitary pump station will be required. The pump station is the
applicant’s responsibility and shall be constructed to a municipal standard and have the capacity to
service the adjacent lands. The pump station may ultimately be replaced by a pump station in the
Albion Fairgrounds and the gravity sewer must be designed to be extended to the existing sewer west
of 240 Street in the future.
The applicant will be required to provide a Traffic Impact Assessment report. The approval of the
report will be a condition of final reading.
ii) Licences, Permits and Bylaws:
The Licenses, Permits and Bylaws Department will be addressing all matters relating to building
permits and the demolition of the existing structures on the subject properties. The review also noted
to ensure sufficient access for emergency vehicles and personnel is provided to the playing field.
iii) Parks, Recreation and Culture Department:
The Parks, Recreation and Culture Department requested the applicant to provide a looping trail for
student use and for future connection to the trail networks near Spencer Creek. The trail design will
work with the natural features in the area, including existing trees, topography and watercourses.
6) Intergovernmental Issues:
i) Local Government Act:
An amendment to the OCP requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to
adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 477 of the Local
Government Act. The amendment required for this application, to re-designate one of the subject
properties located at 24093 104 Avenue, from Medium Density Residential to Institutional is
considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond
existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council
of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments.
- 9 -
The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste
Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact.
7)Citizen/Customer Implications:
A Development Information Meeting was held on September 21, 2017. The results of the concerns
expressed at that meeting are discussed above. The Public Hearing will provide an additional venue
for citizens to express their concern or support of the development.
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that first and second reading be given to OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7369-2017,
that first and second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No.7364-2017 and that application -
2017-291-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing.
“Original signed by Adam Rieu”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Adam Rieu
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by David Boag”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: David Boag
Director of Parks & Facilities
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – OCP Amending Bylaw No. 7369-2017
Appendix D – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7364-2017
Appendix E – Site Plan
Appendix F – Building Elevation Plans, Elementary School
Appendix G – Landscape Plan
DATE: Jul 5, 2017
2017-291-RZ
24093/24137 104 Avenue
009-437-061
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
´
Scale: 1:2,500 BY: JV
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX A
DATE: Jul 5, 2017
2017-291-RZ
24093/24137 104 Avenue
009-437-061
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´
Scale: 1:2,500 BY: JV
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7369-2017
A Bylaw to amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014
___________________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS Section 477 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official
Community Plan;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan,
Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan, and Schedule “C” of the Official Community Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge, enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending
Bylaw No. 7369-2017
2.Schedule "A", Chapter 10.2 Albion Area Plan, Schedule 1: Albion Area Plan is hereby
amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 3 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 10921
Lot 4 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 10921
Lot 9 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 14750
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 952, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended as shown.
3.Schedule “C” is hereby amended for that parcel or tract of land and premises known and
described as:
Lot 3 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 10921
Lot 4 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 10921
Lot 9 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 14750
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 963, a copy of which is attached hereto and
forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby amended by adjusting the Conservation boundary.
APPENDIX C
4. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.7060-2014 is hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20 .
READ a second time the day of , 20 .
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20 .
READ a third time the day of , 20 .
ADOPTED the day of , 20 .
_____________________________________ _____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
242B ST.104 AVE.240 ST.103A AVE.240A ST.10325
10349 2417924188242161052810319 241922420024172241831055524022103751052524154242252420810352 2424024185241562417710366
10420
10313 24222242042421910543241962419024178105522398624093241891054910386 1053124186241952
4
2
3
824169
10316
10525
2421324166242612408624212240611035524028 2417024202241082421810534241642417610456 1053724206242092418924201242202422610343 240602
4
2
3
0
10328
2
4
2
1
2
2413724273
10310 24180242302416024232241482428010337 24027105462417110332 2414210322 242071034010389 1054010346
10331
10358 241962422524238B
PARK
107
12
25
96
8
15
6 10
18
7
14
26
106
111
C
9
105
4
292427
A
110
PARK
137
A 8K
95
139
108
31
5
16
13
15
A
PARK2
14
6
20 12
Rem. Pcl. A
99
13
101
32
1
2
15
PARK
28
9
94
10
14
6
102
4
17
38
4
141
23
5
30
1
1
3
16
104
93
100
138
7
B
97
7
7
33
36
17
3
109
22
3
2
9
PARK
98
11 PARK
A
18
21
PARK
Rem 7 8
Rem D
5
PARK
6
11
142
34
103
19
LMP 48057
(EPS 2387)
BCP 8155
LMP 51537 BCP 438
BCP 9309
P 21769
P 10921
BCP 36407BCP 438BCP 35192
LMP 41823
BCP
4
3
8
P 14750
(EPS 763)
EPP 45286
EPP 49494
LMP 35918
EPP 45286 BCP 8
1
5
3
BCP 35192
P 13554
P 10921 P 66684
1 BCP
8
1
5
3
P 22743
P 11176
NWP7139
BCP 1010P 14864BA
K
E
R
P
L
A
C
E
P 20434
BCP 8153
P 13554
BCP 49334
P 10921
P 14750
P 41519
LMP 51539
EPP 59457
LMP 4
18
2
3
BCP 35253EP 51519RW 66539
EPP 60758
LM
P
5
1
5
3
9
RW 66539
LMP 39369BCP 36408EPP 49495RW 66539
EPP 59458
EPP 471
3
9
EPP 45287
LMP 39314BCP 35252
240 ST.´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose:From:
To:
To Amend Albion Area Plan Schedule 1Medium Density Residential and Institutional
Institutional Conservation
7369-2017952
242B ST.104 AVE.240 ST.103A AVE.240A ST.10325
10349 2417924188242161052810319 241922420024172241831055524022103751052524154242252420810352 2424024185241562417710366
10420
10313 24222242042421910543241962419024178105522398624093241891054910386 1053124186241952
4
2
3
824169
10316
10525
2421324166242612408624212240611035524028 2417024202241082421810534241642417610456 1053724206242092418924201242202422610343 240602
4
2
3
0
10328
2
4
2
1
2
2413724273
10310 24180242302416024232241482428010337 24027105462417110332 2414210322 242071034010389 1054010346
10331
10358 241962422524238B
PARK
107
12
25
96
8
15
6 10
18
7
14
26
106
111
C
9
105
4
292427
A
110
PARK
137
A 8K
95
139
108
31
5
16
13
15
A
PARK2
14
6
20 12
Rem. Pcl. A
99
13
101
32
1
2
15
PARK
28
9
94
10
14
6
102
4
17
38
4
141
23
5
30
1
1
3
16
104
93
100
138
7
B
97
7
7
33
36
17
3
109
22
3
2
9
PARK
98
11 PARK
A
18
21
PARK
Rem 7 8
Rem D
5
PARK
6
11
142
34
103
19
LMP 48057
(EPS 2387)
BCP 8155
LMP 51537 BCP 438
BCP 9309
P 21769
P 10921
BCP 36407BCP 438BCP 35192
LMP 41823
BCP
4
3
8
P 14750
(EPS 763)
EPP 45286
EPP 49494
LMP 35918
EPP 45286 BCP 8
1
5
3
BCP 35192
P 13554
P 10921 P 66684
1 BCP
8
1
5
3
P 22743
P 11176
NWP7139
BCP 1010P 14864BA
K
E
R
P
L
A
C
E
P 20434
BCP 8153
P 13554
BCP 49334
P 10921
P 14750
P 41519
LMP 51539
EPP 59457
LMP 4
18
2
3
BCP 35253EP 51519RW 66539
EPP 60758
LM
P
5
1
5
3
9
RW 66539
LMP 39369BCP 36408EPP 49495RW 66539
EPP 59458
EPP 471
3
9
EPP 45287
LMP 39314BCP 35252
240 ST.´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. Purpose:To Amend Schedule C as shown
To Add to Conservation
7369-2017963
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7364-2017
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7364-2017."
2.That PART 2 INTERPRETATION, ASSEMBLY USE definition is amended by replacing
with the following: a use providing for the assembly of persons for charitable,
philanthropic, cultural, entertainment uses, public transportation depots, or private
educational purposes; includes auditoriums, youth centres, social halls, community
centres, group camps, theatres, private schools, kindergartens, and child care
centres.
3. Those parcel (s) or tract (s) of land and premises known and described as:
Lot 3 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 10921
Lot 4 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 10921
Lot 9 Section 10 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 14750
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1725 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to P-1 (Park and School).
4. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the day of , 20
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX D
242B ST.104 AVE.240 ST.103A AVE.240A ST.10325
10349 2417924188242161052810319 241922420024172241831055524022103751052524154242252420810352 2424024185241562417710366
10420
10313 24222242042421910543241962419024178105522398624093241891054910386 1053124186241952
4
2
3
824169
10316
10525
2421324166242612408624212240611035524028 2417024202241082421810534241642417610456 1053724206242092418924201242202422610343 240602
4
2
3
0
10328
2
4
2
1
2
2413724273
10310 24180242302416024232241482428010337 24027105462417110332 2414210322 242071034010389 1054010346
10331
10358 241962422524238B
PARK
107
12
25
96
8
15
6 10
18
7
14
26
106
111
C
9
105
4
292427
A
110
PARK
137
A 8K
95
139
108
31
5
16
13
15
A
PARK2
14
6
20 12
Rem. Pcl. A
99
13
101
32
1
2
15
PARK
28
9
94
10
14
6
102
4
17
38
4
141
23
5
30
1
1
3
16
104
93
100
138
7
B
97
7
7
33
36
17
3
109
22
3
2
9
PARK
98
11 PARK
A
18
21
PARK
Rem 7 8
Rem D
5
PARK
6
11
142
34
103
19
LMP 48057
(EPS 2387)
BCP 8155
LMP 51537 BCP 438
BCP 9309
P 21769
P 10921
BCP 36407BCP 438BCP 35192
LMP 41823
BCP
4
3
8
P 14750
(EPS 763)
EPP 45286
EPP 49494
LMP 35918
EPP 45286 BCP 8
1
5
3
BCP 35192
P 13554
P 10921 P 66684
1 BCP
8
1
5
3
P 22743
P 11176
NWP7139
BCP 1010P 14864BA
K
E
R
P
L
A
C
E
P 20434
BCP 8153
P 13554
BCP 49334
P 10921
P 14750
P 41519
LMP 51539
EPP 59457
LMP 4
18
2
3
BCP 35253EP 51519RW 66539
EPP 60758
LM
P
5
1
5
3
9
RW 66539
LMP 39369BCP 36408EPP 49495RW 66539
EPP 59458
EPP 471
3
9
EPP 45287
LMP 39314BCP 35252
240 ST.104 AVE.
´
SCALE 1:3,000
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential)P-1 (Park and School)
7364-20171725
APPENDIX E
JULY 7th, 2017 - ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING APPLICATION2017.07.04APPENDIX F
APPENDIX G
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2016-191-RZ
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Second Reading
Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7257-2016;
11939 240th Street
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An application has been received to rezone the subject property, located at 11939 240 Street, from
CS-1 (Service Commercial) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit future construction of a multi-
tenant commercial development with 2,859 m2 (30,774 ft2) of commercial floor space. This project
is not subject to the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) program as there is no residential
component to the development.
This application is in compliance with the OCP.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1)That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7257-2016 be given second reading, and be forwarded to Public
Hearing;
2)That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading:
i)Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of
the deposit of a security, as outlined in the Agreement;
ii)Road dedication on 240th Street as required;
iii)Registration of a Statutory Right-of-Way plan and agreement for pedestrian access from the
south end of the site;
iv) Registration of a Reciprocal Cross Access Easement Agreement;
v)Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Stormwater Management Plan
vi) Removal of existing buildings;
vii) Receipt of a Certificate of Compliance from the Ministry of Environment and Climate
Change Strategy noting conformance with applicable environmental quality standards in
the Regulation;
1107
- 2 -
DISCUSSION:
1) Background Context:
Applicant: Platform Properties Ltd.
Legal Description: Lot 1, Section 16, Township 12, Plan NWP1676
OCP:
Existing: Commercial
Zoning:
Existing: CS-1 (Service Commercial)
Proposed: C-2 (Community Commercial)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Vacant
Zone: CS-2 (Community Commercial) (recently completed under
rezoning application 2016-039-RZ)
Designation: Commercial
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: CD-1-93 (Amenity Residential District), RS1-b (One Family
(Medium Density) Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
East: Use: Vacant
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Agricultural (in the Agricultural Land Reserve)
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-1 (Residential District)
Designation: Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: Commercial
Site Area: 0.946 ha. (2.3 acres)
Access: 240 Street
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
2) Background:
The first reading report noted the subject property was potentially a contaminated site, due to its
previous uses as an auto wrecking yard. The applicant has commenced site remediation, and
correspondence received from the Ministry of Environment received August 18, 2017, indicates that
the remediation process is complete and the site is eligible for a Certificate of Compliance.
The first reading report also discussed the Maple Ridge Housing Action Plan and its
recommendations for increasing rental housing stock within the City. These recommendations
included encouraging new rental units above commercial developments as they arise. Although pre-
application meetings included dialogue for rental housing, the applicant’s preference consistently
has been for single storey commercial without residential uses. The Council resolution accompanying
first reading did not require second storey rental accommodation, and the meeting minutes did not
indicate a preference for revisions towards this objective. For this reason, the application as
proposed is considered supportable.
- 3 -
3) Project Description:
The applicant proposes to rezone the property and construct a multi-unit commercial development.
The total proposed floor area is 2,859 square metres (30,774 ft2), distributed between one larger
anchor tenant and several smaller commercial units. Through cross access agreements with
adjacent properties, the proposed commercial site will be integrated with the other commercial uses
to the north of the site (recently adopted Tim Horton’s site and the Outpost Liquor Store)
4) Planning Analysis:
i) Official Community Plan:
The subject property is located within the Urban Area Boundary and is designated Commercial. The
OCP identifies the intersection of Dewdney Trunk Road and 240 Street as one of three Community
Commercial Nodes in the city. The OCP further states that these nodes “are comprised of
commercial or mixed use developments and typically serve several neighbourhoods; provide a wider
range of services; and also serve as a focus for the community.”
Typically, Community Commercial Nodes are less than 7,000 m² (75,350 ft²) in area, but may
increase to 9,290 m² (100,000 ft²) over the long-term. The current commercial floor space at
Dewdney Trunk Road and 240 Street is approximately 3,110 m2 (33,456 ft2), and this proposal will
increase the commercial floor space to approximately 6,362 m² (68,480 ft2). It is noted that there
are two other commercial rezoning projects in the Dewdney Trunk Road and 240 Street node, at
11951 240 Street and at 12040 240 Street. Once build-out is attained, the anticipated commercial
floor space will be within the range suggested in the OCP as appropriate for meeting community
needs. The C-2 (Community Commercial) zone aligns with the Commercial designation and the
Community Commercial Node.
In accordance with OCP Policy 6-12, an Agricultural Impact Assessment and Groundwater Impact
Assessment are required due to the subject property’s adjacency to the Agricultural Land Reserve. A
combined assessment report has been received and is discussed further in this report.
ii) Zoning Bylaw:
The Community Commercial Node in the Commercial land use designation aligns with both the CS-1
(Service Commercial) zone and the C-2 (Community Commercial) zone. The applicant is pursuing
rezoning to the C-2 (Community Commercial) zone because the permitted principal uses reflect the
anticipated mix of neighbourhood serving businesses.
The current application proposes to rezone the subject property located at 11939 240 Street from
CS-1 (Service Commercial) to C-2 (Community Commercial) to permit future construction of a multi-
tenant commercial development. The minimum lot size for the current CS-1 (Service Commercial)
zone is 929 m2, and the minimum lot size for the proposed C-2 (Community Commercial) zone is
2,500 m2. Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development
Variance Permit application.
iii) Off-Street Parking And Loading Bylaw:
Parking requirements in the proposed C-2 Community Commercial Zone are based on gross floor
area at a ratio of 1 parking stall per 30 square meters. The proposed commercial floor space is
2859 square meters, and therefore the required parking will be 96 parking stalls. The applicant is
proposing 140 stalls, of which 3 are accessible, and 14 are for small cars. These parking provisions
meet requirements in the Bylaw.
- 4 -
iv) Proposed Variances:
A Development Variance Permit application has been received for this project and involves the
following relaxations (see Appendix D):
Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985,
o Rear yard setback to be varied from 6.0 metres to 4.5 meters.
Maple Ridge Sign Bylaw No. 4653 - 1992
o Free standing sign to be varied by increasing the copy area of the secondary sign
to exceed maximum permitted. Total number of signs will be less than maximum
permitted, from the permitted 3 to 2. Overall copy area will not exceed maximum
permitted.
The requested variances to the C-2 zone and Sign Bylaw will be the subject of a future Council report.
v) Development Permits:
Pursuant to Section 8.5 of the OCP, a Commercial Development Permit application is required to
address the current proposal’s compatibility with adjacent development, and to enhance the unique
character of the community.
The commercial development will have tall hedging at the interface between residential and
commercial structures. The single storey massing will be unobtrusive in the residential context.
Pedestrian circulation will be fostered with the landscape plan and asphalt treatments marking
vehicle access points.
vi) Advisory Design Panel:
The Advisory Design Panel (ADP) reviewed the form and character of the proposed development and
the landscaping plans at a meeting held on June 13, 2017. The following resolution was passed in
regards to 2016-191-DP at the meeting of the Advisory Design Panel:
That the application be supported and the following concerns be addressed as the design
develops and be submitted to Planning staff for follow-up:
1. Provide planting islands to break up the parking strips.
2. Provide pavement treatment (such as stamped concrete or coloured asphalt) at
entrances off of 240th.
3. Provide speed bumps before and after main pedestrian crossing to Building 2000.
4. Parking stalls along Buildings 1000 and 2000 to be done in alternative paving materials.
5. Provide outdoor seating in front of both buildings by reducing two stalls into “small car”
stalls.
6. Provide screening for roof top units on both buildings and provide a detail on the
architectural plans.
7. Accentuate the north east corner element of Building 1000 facing 240th Street.
8. Provide a second bracket at both corners of Building 1000 to balance elevation.
9. Indicate on landscaping plans that structural soil for trees in parking medians will be
provided.
10. Consider providing additional bicycle racks.
The ADP concerns have been addressed and are reflected in the current plans. A detailed
description of how these items were incorporated into the final design will be included in a future
development permit report to Council.
- 5 -
vii) Development Information Meeting:
A Development Information Meeting was held in the library at Andrew Robinson Elementary School
on April 5, 2017. Approximately 15 people attended the meeting. A summary of the main comments
and discussions with the attendees was provided by the applicant and include the following main
points:
Support for the land use proposal
Concern with proposed lane connection and nuisance concerns of increased litter
and inappropriate behaviour around the commercial development.
Concern with the proposed garbage container location at the southwest portion of
the site, due to noise, odour, and rodents.
The applicant’s response is as follows:
Issues raised point to conflicts between public concerns and municipal requirements,
through required site services for pedestrian circulation, and development permit
requirements. While there is no simple resolution to these issues raised, mitigation attempts
are sought where possible, by means such the orientation of the garbage containers on the
site.
5)Environmental Implications:
The subject property was used as an autowrecking yard until 2013. Some contamination was noted,
and remediation works have commenced. The Ministry of Environment confirms that required
remediation is complete, and the project is eligible for a certificate of compliance.
6)Agricultural Impact:
As 240th street marks the edge of the urban area boundary, the site is adjacent to ALR land to its
east. The requirement for an agricultural impact assessment was thereby triggered, in accordance
with Policy 6-12 of the Official Community Plan. The applicant has provided this assessment, with
key findings as follows;
Increased vehicle traffic: The assessment concluded that any negative impacts would be
negligible.
Noise and light pollution: The assessment noted that landscaping and lighting design would
mitigate these effects.
Increased pressure at the urban/rural interface: The assessment concluded that 240th
street would provide an effective buffer at this interface.
Pedestrian traffic: No impacts noted.
Increased stormwater runoff: These impacts will be mitigated through the required
Stormwater management plan.
Contamination of groundwater: As previous site contamination will be remediated, the
potential for further impacts will be reduced by this development.
7)Interdepartmental Implications:
i)Engineering Department:
Engineering comments noted the need for road dedication along 240 th Street, for servicing upgrades
to sewer, water and storm, street improvements including sidewalk, curb and gutter, lighting, street
trees. A traffic impact study was provided by the applicant in support of a second access on the
subject property on 240th Street. This second access was approved as a right in, right out access, to
be located approximately midway along the 240 Street frontage.
- 6 -
ii)License, Permits and Bylaws Department:
Building Department comments will be reviewed in light of the required Development Permit
application, and will be provided to Council at a later date.
iii)Fire Department:
Fire Department comments focused on a fire safety plan, including the placement of private fire
hydrants, and appropriate addressing to assist with emergency response.
8)Intergovernmental Issues:
As noted, involvement of the Ministry of Environment has been required for site remediation.
9)Citizen/Customer Implications:
Public input has been received at the Development Information Meeting. Additional opportunities for
citizen comment will be provided through the required Public Hearing, and through the notification
process that will accompany the required development variance permit.
CONCLUSION:
It is recommended that second reading be given to Zone Amending Bylaw No7257-2016, and that
application 2016-191-RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing.
“Original signed by Diana Hall”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Diana Hall, M.A., MCIP, RPP
Planner 2
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7257-2016
Appendix D – Site Plan
Appendix E – Building Elevation Plans
Appendix F – Landscape Plan
DATE: Jun 3, 2016
2016-191-RZ
BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Dewdney Trunk Rd
´
Scale: 1:2,500
11939 240 StLegend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River Centreline
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX A
DATE: Jun 3, 2016
2016-191-RZ
BY: JV
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Dewdney Trunk Rd
´
Scale: 1:2,500
11939 240 St
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2015
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River Centreline
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX B
CITY OF MAPLE RIDGE
BYLAW NO. 7257-2016
A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended
______________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as
amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
1.This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 7257-2016."
2.That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as:
South Half Lot 1 Section 16 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 1676
and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1681 a copy of which is attached hereto
and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to C-2 (Community Commercial).
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended and Map "A" attached
thereto are hereby amended accordingly.
READ a first time the 12th day of July, 2016.
READ a second time the day of , 20
PUBLIC HEARING held the day of , 20
READ a third time the day of , 20
ADOPTED, the day of , 20
_____________________________ ____________________________
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
APPENDIX C
240 ST.119B AVE.
119A AVE.239 ST.DEWDNEY TRUNK RD.LANE118A AVE.239 ST.119 AVE.2393811966
2385511875
2395523892118452388223962
11840
11868 23895238312388911939
11918
118112398211951
11980
23956239272397211970 24079/2408511942
238902402211960 239812388523925238992394323997239392405411818
11930
11968
2397911856
2389811893
23970238802399
4
11869
119242388123894
2389711852
11954
238932392011828
11950
11857
2398111948
11972
11922/54
23886118212396211913 2407223996
23957239832393223860238132
3
9
9
2
11829
118612387911877
23928239712386723908238912389811804
11846
11940
11960
11936
11816
1184923840 239952398811930 2395211837
11888
2399823864
238302384323969238802382211880
11806 2394011853
239671190123942
2389523825239782389111903
239532392223925240092403611907
26
6
34
Rem
7
4
5
27
46
7
5
4
4
N1/2
13
S 1/2
Pcl
1
9
2
40
8
7
7
6
14
39
5
6
2
1
of B
33
6
20
3
10
A
18
22
12
4
5
Rem15
2
5
10
9
Rem 2
6
Rem A
Rem
12
Rem A
31
52
38
W 1/2
2
3
28
11
49
1
of 13
6
1917
2
5
1
N 1/2 1
1
35
15
32
25
37
6
21
10
S 1/2
3
2
2
A
of B
45
3
23
41
4
1 2
11
36
Rem N 1/2
4
29
16
50
24
37
8
3
A
4 3
9
51
30
13
43
4
8
8
44
3
Rem 21
3
5
42
11 7
P 7893
LMP 1144 EP 12537LMP 18051
18051 LMP 18051P 1676
P 1676
LMP
P 1973
LMP
LMP 18051
LMP 18051
LMP 18051P 67082
P 23165
P 7893
P 83677P 7528EP 11375
LMP 18051
1144
(P 21864)
LMP 806
LMP 1641
LMP 1641
BCP 45642P 76536P 7893
LMP 33117P 88032
LMS2315LMP 14766P 25968P 20898P 7893
P 86310
RP 13881LMP 18051
R
W
8
3
6
7
8
BCP 45643
LMP 30401
RP 85321
RP 57056BCP 7213LMP 29899RW 83679RW 86310 LMP 54074
LMP 33118RW 30273
LMP 1145
LMP 1642 BCP 41049BCP 7213
LMP 38196
LMP 33118RP 84994
DEWDNEY TRUNK RD.
´
SCALE 1:2,500
MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDINGBylaw No. Map No. From:
To:
CS-1 (Service Commercial)
C-2 (Community Commercial)
7257-20161681
Urban Area Boundary
Urban Area Boundary
Site Plan
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX E
Landscape Plan
APPENDIX F
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2016-008-DVP
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit
24021 110 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A Development Variance Permit application (2016-008-DVP) has been received in conjunction with a
rezoning, development and subdivision application to develop the subject property, located at 24021
110 Avenue (recent consolidated properties 11016, 11032 and 11038 240 Street) into 8 single
family residential lots and 15 townhouse units. The requested variances are to:
1.Increase the maximum building height for the townhouse units, from 11m to 11.4m (34.4ft)
2.Reduce the front yard setback for the townhouse units, from 7.5m to 6m (19.6ft) to the
building face, and 3.8m (12.4ft)to the deck
3.Reduce the rear yard setback for the townhouse units, from 7.5m to 7.0m (22.9ft)
4.Reduce the exterior side setback for the townhouse units, from 7.5m to 3.5m (11.4ft) to the
building face, and 1.3m (4.2ft) to the deck
5.Reduce the interior side setback for the townhouse units, from 4.5m to 2.4m (7.8ft) to the
building face, and 0.6m (1.9ft) to the deck
6.Increase the maximum height for retaining walls, from 1.2m to 1.8m (5.9ft)
Council considered final reading for rezoning application 2016-008-RZ on September 19, 2017.
It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2016-008-DVP be approved.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-008-DVP respecting the property
located at 24021 110 Avenue.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: Greenwood Properties Ltd.
Legal Description: Lot 1, Section 10, Township 12, New Westminster
District Plan EPP68120
(recent consolidation of Lot 4, North Half / Lot 4,
South Half / Lot 5, Block 9, Section 10, Township
12, New Westminster District Plan 17613
1108
- 2 -
OCP : Medium Density Residential, Conservation
Zoning: RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) and R-3 (Special
Amenity Residential District)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential and Conservation
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Low/Medium Density Residential and Conservation
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 0.808 ha. in total (2 acres)
Access: lane access off of 110 Avenue
Servicing requirement: Urban Standard
b)Project Description:
The rezoning application proposed to rezone the original three subject properties (11016, 11032
and 11038 240 Street) from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to R-3 (Special Amenity Residential
District) and RM-1 (Townhouse Residential), to permit future subdivision into 8 R-3 zoned single
family lots, not less than 285m2, and a 15 unit townhouse development. The lots are consolidated
as a requirement of rezoning. Access for all lots is proposed to be from a new lane created off of 110
Avenue. No driveway accesses are permitted onto 240 Street, as it is an arterial road where
alternative access (i.e. a new lane) is available. The lane access is proposed to be a 9m thoroughfare
from 110 Avenue into the townhouse site, to comply with Building Code and Fire Code requirements
for direct Fire Department vehicle access.
c)Variance Analysis:
The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for single family
development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval
process.
The requested variances and rationale for support are described below (see Appendices C, D and E):
In order to achieve the desired layout while ensuring the requirements for protection of the
watercourse and natural habitat, consideration has been given to accomplish a reasonable design,
while integrating dedication and compensation. Therefore, from an environmental planning point of
view, the proposed variances are supportable.
1.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985, Part 4, Section 403 (8):
To increase the maximum retaining wall height, from 1.2m to 1.8m
- 3 -
2.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985, Part 6, Section 602 6.a):
To reduce the front yard setback, from 7.5m to 6m to the building face, and 3.8m to
the deck, and
To reduce the rear yard setback, from 7.5m to 7.0m, and
Reduce the exterior side setback, from 7.5m to 3.5m to the building face, and 1.3m
to the deck, and
To reduce the interior side setback, from 4.5m to 2.4m to the building face, and
0.6m to the deck
3.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No 3510 -1985, Part 6, Section 602 (7a):
To increase the maximum building height, from 11m to 11.4m
d)Citizen/Customer Implications:
In accordance with the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, notice of Council
consideration of a resolution to issue a Development Variance Permit was mailed to all owners or
tenants in occupation of all parcels, any parts of which are adjacent to the property that is subject to
the permit.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed variances are supported because the townhouse units were designed in coordination
with park dedication and environmental compensation areas to fit into the neighbourhood context
and the lot design does not negatively impact surrounding residences.
It is therefore recommended that this application be favourably considered and the Corporate Officer
be authorized to sign and seal Development Variance Permit 2016-008-DVP.
“Original signed by Therese Melser”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Therese Melser
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Variance request retaining wall
Appendix D - Variance requests for townhouse development
DATE: Oct 5, 2017
2016-008-VP
24021 110 Avenue
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,500 BY: JV
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX A
City of PittMeadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER R.
^
DATE: Jan 22, 2016
FILE: 2016-008-RZ
BY: PC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
´
Scale: 1:2,500
11016/32/38 240 STREET
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2011
110 AVE
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2017-323-DVP
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit
23055 117 Avenue
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Development Variance Permit application (2017-323-DVP) has been received in conjunction with a
subdivision application to subdivide the property located on 23055 117 Avenue into 10 proposed
single family lots. The requested variance is to:
1.Reduce the required lot width in the R-1 zone, from 12m to 11.3m for lot 1, and to 11.4m for
lot 2.
It is recommended that Development Variance Permit 2017-323-DVP be approved.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2017-323-DVP respecting property located
at 23055 117 Avenue.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context
Applicant: 1088396 BC LTD.
Legal Description: Lot 6, Section 17, Township 12, Plan LMP37496
OCP: Urban Residential
Zoning: R-1 (Residential District)
Surrounding Uses:
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-1 (Residential District)
Designation Urban Residential
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-1 (Residential District) and RS-1 (One Family
Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
1109
- 2 -
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-1 (Residential District)
Designation: Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Site Area: 4890 m2
Access: off of 117th and off of Cliff Avenue
Servicing: Urban Standard
Lot Size: ranging from 372-411 m2
Concurrent Applications: 2016-441-SD
b)Project Description:
A Development Variance Permit application has been received to seek approval to vary the minimum
width requirement for the single family subdivision into 10 lots on the property located 23055 117
Avenue (see Appendix A). The requested variance is to reduce the minimum width for the R-1
(Residential District) zone.
c)Variance Analysis:
The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for single family
development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process.
The requested variances and rationale for support are described below (see Appendices B and C):
1.Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No 3510 -1985, Schedule D Minimum Lot Area and Dimensions:
To reduce the minimum width for the R-1 (Residential District) zone, from 12m to 11.3m on
lot 1, and to 11.4m on lot 2
The subdivision proposal is to subdivide the property into 10 lots, with 2 lots accessing from 117
Avenue and 8 lots getting access from a cul-de-sac connecting to Cliff Avenue. The Engineering
Design Criteria Manual requires cul-de-sac’s to have a minimum radius for the proposed design. In
order to satisfy the minimum lot area for R-1 zoned lots and have an acceptable frontage for
proposed lot 2, a variance to reduce the width of proposed lot 1 and 2, to be able to create a
minimum radius for the cul-de-sac, is supportable.
d)Citizen/Customer Implications:
In accordance with the Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999, notice of Council
consideration of a resolution to issue a Development Variance Permit was mailed to all owners or
tenants in occupation of all parcels, any parts of which are adjacent to the property that is subject to
the permit.
- 3 -
CONCLUSION:
The proposed variance to reduce lot width for proposed lot 1 and 2 to be able to create a minimum
radius for the cul-de-sac, is supportable, therefore it is recommended that this application be
favourably considered and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Development Variance
Permit 2017-323-DVP.
“Original signed by Therese Melser”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Therese Melser
Planning Technician
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Subject Map
Appendix B – Ortho Map
Appendix C – Variance request
DATE: Jul 27, 2017
2017-323-VP
23055 117 Avenue
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
Scale: 1:2,500 BY: JV
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
CLIFF AVE.
117 AVE.
APPENDIX A
DATE: Jul 27, 2017
2017-323-VP
23055 117 Avenue
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´
Scale: 1:2,500 BY: JV
Legend
Stream
Indefinite Creek
River
Major Rivers & Lakes
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council FILE NO: 2016-347-DP
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Intensive Residential Development Permit
24021 110 Ave
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
An Intensive Residential Development Permit application has been received for the subject property,
located at 24021 110 Avenue, for eight R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zoned lots. The
site is located within the Albion Area Plan and has a land use designation of Single Family
Residential. The Intensive Residential Development Permit provides a greater emphasis on high
standards in aesthetics and quality of the built environment, with the intent to provide an
environment that is safe, attractive, people-friendly and environmentally responsive.
Final reading for rezoning application 2016-008-RZ was granted on September 19, 2017. It is
recommended that Intensive Residential Development Permit 2016-347-DP be approved.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal 2016-347-DP respecting property located
at 24021 110 Avenue.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
Applicant: GREENWOOD PROPERTIES LTD.
Legal Description: Lot 1, Sec 10, Townplan 12, New Westminster
District Plan EPP68120
OCP : Medium Density Residential
Zoning: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
Surrounding Uses
North: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation Low/Medium Density Residential
South: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District)
Designation: Single Family Residential
East: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RM-1 Townhouse Residential
Designation: Medium Density Residential
West: Use: Single Family Residential
Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential)
Designation: Urban Residential
Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Servicing requirements Urban Standard
1110
- 2 -
b)Project Description:
The subject property located at 24021 110 Avenue was consolidated under rezoning application
2016-008-RZ, and is going to get subdivided under application 2016-347-SD, into 8 Single Family
lots, an access lane, and a townhouse site. The subsequent multi-family development permit has
been granted on September 19, 2017, together with final reading on the rezoning file.
c)Planning Analysis:
An Intensive Residential Development Permit is required for all new Intensive Residential
developments with R-3 (Special Amenity Residential District) zoning. Section 8.8 Intensive
Residential Development Permit Area Guidelines of the Official Community Plan (OCP) aims to
provide a greater emphasis on high standards in aesthetics, with the intent to provide an
environment that is safe, attractive, people-friendly and environmentally responsive. The key
guidelines for the development permit area are as follows:
1.Neighbourhood cohesiveness and connectivity should be maintained through the design of
varied yet compatible buildings, in materials used and in architectural styles, in landscapes
and in recreational areas, and by facilitating a range of transportation choices.
The single-family homes have been designed to have unique front elevations while
maintaining a compatible building design in terms of materials used and architectural styles.
Differing front elevations in number of gables and size, and number and location of windows
provide the varied look (see Appendix D).
2.A vibrant street presence is to be maintained through a variety of housing styles, by
maintaining street parking and by directing garage structures and off-street parking to the
rear of a property accessible by a lane.
All lots will be accessed off of a new constructed lane, also accessing the new townhouse
site on the east side of the property. Proposed Lots 1 and 2 have parking pads in accordance
with the corner visibility criteria, and driveway criteria in the Zoning Bylaw.
d)Requested Variance
A Development Variance Permit accompanies this Intensive Residential Development Permit to:
1.Increase the maximum height for retaining walls, from 1.2m to 1.8m (5.9ft)
The requested variance is the subject of a separate report to Council under application 2016-008-
DVP. This DVP will also address setback and height variances related to the townhouse portion of the
development.
- 3 -
CONCLUSION:
This proposal conforms to the Official Community Plan for the Intensive Residential Development
Permit Guidelines, and the neighbourhood’s existing lot and road pattern. It is therefore
recommended that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Intensive Residential
Development Permit 2016–347-DP respecting the property located at 24021 110 Avenue.
“Original signed by Therese Melser”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: Therese Melser
“Original signed by Christine Carter”
_____________________________________________
Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
_______________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
GM: Public Works & Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
The following appendices are attached hereto:
Appendix A – Ortho photo
Appendix B – Subdivision Plan
Appendix C – elevation plans lot 1-8, Rusbourne Design
FILE: 2016-347-DP
DATE: Oct 17, 2017
24021 110 AVENUE
City of PittMeadows
District of
Langley District of MissionFRASER
R
.
^
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Aerial Imagery from the Spring of 2016´
Scale: 1:2,500 BY: PC
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
>Kdϰ
Page 1 of 1
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Sign Control Bylaw No. 7008-2013
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This report is to provide Council with an update on the progress of adopting a new sign bylaw.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That the three reading given to Sign Control Bylaw No. 7008-2013 be rescinded.
DISCUSSION:
In 2013, staff prepared a draft sign bylaw to replace the old sign bylaw which had been adopted in 1992.
Several public engagements were held which included businesses, developers and the Business
Improvement Association. After the consultations were evaluated a revised draft was presented to
Council in 2014. This proposed new bylaw was given three readings. The fourth reading was not given as
it would have occurred subsequent to the 2014 municipal elections and it was decided that the new
Council should have greater input into this new bylaw.
As some time as elapsed since the proposed bylaw was given three readings, and there have been
changes in regulations and types of signs, it is proposed that the process should be restarted and a new
bylaw be presented to Council. After Council has given the new bylaw first reading, staff can then
schedule consultations to receive input from interested parties and prepare a comprehensive report for
Council.
Some of the changes will include updating the definition section of the bylaw so that there is a clear
understanding of the different types of signs such as “freestanding”, “fascia” “third party”, “construction
sign” etc.
CONCLUSIONS:
A new sign bylaw is needed to address the various issues regarding signs and to bring the bylaw into
alignment with current regulations. This process will include input from the various stakeholders such as
developers, businesses and other interested parties.
“Original signed by R. MacNair”
_______________________________________________
Prepared by: R. MacNair
Manager of Bylaw & Licensing Services
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
__________________________________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng
General Manager: Public Works and Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
_______________________________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
1111
Page 1 of 3
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017
and Members of Council
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Proposed New Sign Bylaw 7389 - 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an updated proposed Sign Bylaw No. 7389 –
2017 which is being presented to council on this date. Signs play a major role for businesses and
other community activities for advertising purposes and to assist the public in locating their
operations. There are times when additional temporary signage is necessary to draw attention to
specific sales, a new business location or other similar short term changes in operation.
The proposed new Bylaw is intended to improve and simplify the issuance of sign permits, provide
more clarity and simplify the bylaw for use and provides a document that better addresses the
changes in technology and the changes to how businesses operate. The bylaw has also been
revised to provide the correct authorities necessary for enforcement.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1.That Maple Ridge Sign Bylaw No. 7389-2017 be given first reading.
2.That Council support the public process as outlined in this report.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
The purpose of municipal sign bylaws include;
•Enabling local businesses, institutions, and community organizations to clearly identify
themselves and the products or services available
•Enhancing the appearance and visual character of the community through appropriate
signage; and
•Ensuring the safety of pedestrians, cyclists and motorists by ensuring that signs are properly
located, minimize distraction, and do not interfere with traffic control devices
Previously a number of public information sessions were held with the local business and industry
communities to provide input on suggested changes to the current bylaw. After these sessions and
with input from staff a bylaw was drafted and presented to Council for consideration.
Due to the lapse in time from the previous bylaw, the changes in sign technology and the changes in
business practices for the local business it was felt to be appropriate to renew the bylaw in light of
these changes. The proposed bylaw attached to this report is believed to be more in harmony with
1112
Page 2 of 3
local business interests and provides the current Council the opportunity to have input into this
Bylaw.
A primary focus is to make a Bylaw more user friendly, easier to read and to interpret. The proposed
Bylaw corrects a number of significant problems in the current Bylaw with some of these corrections
identified below:
1. Significant improvements and additions to the Definition section of the Bylaw to provide
clarity.
2. Identify and separate those sign types that either wholly or partially encroach onto municipal
property, whether they are on the roadway, sidewalk, boulevard, or overhang any of these
areas. Liability issues must be dealt with for these encroachments by way or third party
liability insurance to protect the City against potential liability claims.
3. Provide an alternative to sandwich board signs where businesses have an awning or a
canopy.
4. Sandwich Board and/or Pedestal Signs now have specific requirements for placement, size
and liability insurance. These types of signs, where permitted, will need to be incorporated
into the streetscape in a safe manner.
5. Where applications are made for sign types that are not addressed in the Sign Bylaw the
applicant has the option of using the Development Permit process. The appropriate changes
have been made to the Bylaw to clarify this process.
6. Revised regulations have been set out for Election Signs. More specifically the size,
placement and number of these signs.
7. Regulations for the placement of private and public sector information signs on public rights
of ways for specific short periods of time addressing a number of issues.
8. Reduce and simplify how the size and copy area of signs are calculated.
The work completed on the proposed new Sign Bylaw creates an integrated sign permit system that
involves Permits & Inspection Services, Licenses & Bylaws Services, along with the Clerks,
Engineering and Planning Departments. The proposed Bylaw provides for more clarity in the
application process, clearly differentiates between signs on private and public property and sets out
the process for applying for each type of sign where applicable.
Additional amendments provided for in this bylaw are changes to the definitions that have been
made to clarify terms and to reflect current staff titles. In addition, for clarification purposes, the
Bylaw has been reorganized to separate the types of signs that require a permit and while still
identifying regulations regarding the installation and/or design of signs that do not require permits.
b) Next Steps:
For public engagement the proposed bylaw will be presented to;
• The Public in Information Meetings
• Meetings with BIA
• Meet with Chamber of Commerce
• Online survey
• Open House
• UDI/GVHBA Liaison Committee
Page 3 of 3
These meetings will be held over the coming months with the result of these meetings being
presented to Council in 2018.
c) Desired Outcome(s):
That Council supports Sign Bylaw 7389-2017 by referring it for further public consultation.
d) Citizen/Customer Implications:
A bylaw that is clear and understandable to all users. To that end the Public Engagement
process will involve holding directed meetings with industry and local business groups to
obtain their input and suggestions on the proposed changes. We will also hold public
information sessions with the community at large to help provide a community direction on
signs within the City.
e) Interdepartmental Implications
The work completed on the proposed new Sign Bylaw creates an integrated sign permit
system that involves Permits & Inspection Services, Licenses & Bylaws Services, along with
the Clerks, Engineering and Planning Departments.
f) Alternatives
Council could decide that the previous consultation was sufficient and advance the adoption
of the bylaw on that basis.
CONCLUSIONS:
The proposed bylaw before you builds upon the previous draft bylaw and provides additional
revisions based on interaction with the current bylaw and applicants.
“Original signed by Stephen J. Cote-Rolvink”____________
Prepared by: Stephen J. Côté-Rolvink
Chief Building Official, Permits & Inspection Services
“Original signed by Frank Quinn” for __________________
Prepared by: Robyn McNair
Manager Bylaws & Licensing Services
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”______________________
Approved by: Frank Quinn
General Manager: Public Works and Development Services
“Original signed by Paul Gill” ________________________
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
/SJCR
Revised 2017-10-13
City of Maple Ridge
Sign Bylaw
Bylaw No. 7389 - 2017
Effective Date:
Revised 2017-10-13
City of Maple Ridge
Sign Bylaw No. 7389 - 2017
Table of Contents
Part 1 Citation ................................................................................................................. 1
Part 2 Severability .......................................................................................................... 1
Part 3 Previous Bylaw Repeal ........................................................................................ 1
Part 4 Definitions ............................................................................................................ 2
Part 5 Interpretation ....................................................................................................... 8
Part 6 General Provisions .............................................................................................. 8
Part 7 Exemption .......................................................................................................... 10
Part 8 Prohibited Signs ................................................................................................ 12
Part 9 Non-Conforming Signs ...................................................................................... 13
Part 10 Maintenance of Signs ....................................................................................... 13
Part 11 Sign Permits and Fees ...................................................................................... 13
Part 12 Inspections and Regulations ............................................................................ 15
Part 13 Specific Sign Regulations ................................................................................. 18
Part 14 Penalty and Enactment ..................................................................................... 25
Schedule “A” – Sign Permit Fees .................................................................................... 26
Schedule “B” – Cross Reference Table .......................................................................... 27
Schedule “C” – Temporary Sign Permit Application ...................................................... 29
Schedule “D” – Sign Impoundment Recovery Costs .................................................... 31
Schedule “E” – Signs Permitted in All Zones 32
Schedule “F” – Signs Permitted in Agricultural and Residential Zones 34
Schedule “G” – All Commercial Zones 35
Schedule “H” – All Industrial Zones 37
Schedule “I” – All Institutional Zones 39
Revised 2017-10-13
City of Maple Ridge
Sign Bylaw No. 7389 - 2017
A bylaw to regulate signs within the City of Maple Ridge.
WHEREAS Pursuant to section 908 of the Local Government Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 323 but
subject to the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act R.S.B.C. 1996, C318 and the
Transportation Act, S.BC., 2004 c. 44 Council may, by bylaw regulate the number, size, type,
form, appearance and locations of signs in the City, and the bylaw may contain different
provisions for different zones, different uses within a zone, and different classes of
highways;
AND WHEREAS Pursuant to sections 8(4) and 65 of the Community Charter , S.B.C., C. 26
Council may, by bylaw regulate and impose requirements in relation to signs and advertising
in the City and regulate or prohibit the erection, placing, alteration, maintenance, demolition
and removal of a sign, sign board, advertisement, advertising device or structure;
AND WHEREAS Council wishes to allow for signs in the City, while simultaneously preserving
and enhancing Maple Ridge’s character, and ensuring that signs are designed, constructed,
installed and maintained so that energy consumption is minimized, and public safety and
traffic safety are not compromised.
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Maple Ridge enacts as follows:
Part 1 Citation
1.1 This bylaw may be cited as Sign Bylaw No. 7389 - 2017.
Part 2 Severability
2.1 If a portion of this bylaw is held invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction, then the invalid
portion must be severed and the remainder of this bylaw is deemed to have been adopted
without the severed section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, clause or phrase.
Part 3 Previous Bylaw Repeal
3.1 Sign Bylaw No. 4653 – 1992 (adopted on August 10, 1992) is hereby repealed and the
following amendment bylaw is hereby repealed:
Maple Ridge Sign Amending Bylaw No.4762-1992.
2
Part 4 Definitions
For words not defined in this Bylaw, the definitions contained in the Maple Ridge Building Bylaw
and Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw and the Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic Bylaw as amended from
time to time shall apply. Where the same words are defined in more than one bylaw, the
definition in this Bylaw shall apply for purposes of administering this Bylaw.
“Abandoned Sign” means any sign which no longer directs persons to or advertises a
business, lessor, owner, product or activity conducted or product in existence or available on
the lot where the sign is displayed or which is not identifying the owner, occupant, occupancy,
user or use of the lot of a building or structure on the lot, on which such sign is situated.
“Awning” means a detachable system of fabric or other material which is supported entirely
from the exterior wall of a building by a fixed or retractable frame.
“Awning Sign” means a non-illuminated sign on an awning which shall only be painted on,
affixed flat against the surface of an awning by means of a decal, or form part of the fabric of
an awning which does not extend vertically or horizontally beyond the limits of such awning.
“Balcony Sign” means a sign supported on, against or suspended from a balcony.
“Balloon Sign” means an inflated three-dimensional device which is affixed or anchored to
the ground or a structure and which contains information and where the intent is to attract
the attention of persons for the express purpose of the communication of that information.
“Banner Sign” means a flexible plastic or fabric sign, excluding an awning, affixed to a
building that is used as a temporary sign but excludes a flag.
“Building” means any structure used or intended for supporting or sheltering any use or
occupancy.
“Bench Sign” means a sign affixed to, painted or placed upon part of a bench located on
public property at a bus stop, rest area or park.
“Billboard” means an exterior structure displaying advertising material for third parties of a
non-accessory nature either electronically or pasted or otherwise affixed flat to the face of
such structure and which exceeds 28m² (301 sq. ft.) in sign area.
“Bus Shelter” a covered structure intended to shelter bus patrons within or above public
property which is approved by the City located at a bus stop in ordinary use by buses
operated by a public transit authority.
“Business” means the carrying on of a commercial or industrial undertaking of any kind or
nature or the providing of professional, personal or other services for the purpose of gain or
profit.
“Business Premises” means that portion of a building owned, leased or rented by a person or
persons for the conducting of a business.
“Building Official” includes the Chief Building Official, Building Inspectors, Gas/Plumbing
Inspectors, Electrical Inspectors, Trades Inspectors, Safety Officers and Plan Checkers
designated by the Corporation of the City of Maple Ridge.
3
“Bylaw Compliance Officer” means the person appointed from time to time by Council to act
in the capacity as the City Bylaw Compliance Officer.
“Canopy or Marquee” means a permanent non-retractable hood, shelter or cover which
projects from the wall of a building but does not include a projecting roof.
“Canopy Sign” means a sign attached to or constructed on the face of a canopy.
“Changeable Copy Sign” means a sign on which copy can be changed manually through the
use of attachable letters, numerals, graphics or pictorial.
“Chief Building Official” means the Chief Building Official for the Permits and Inspection
Services Department for the City of Maple Ridge or their designate.
“City” means the City of Maple Ridge.
“Clearance” means the vertical distance measured from grade to the lesser of the underside
of a sign or its supporting structure or the bottom of an awning valance.
“Construction” means the erection, alteration, replacement, addition, removal, moving and
demolition of Buildings, Structures and of all appurtenances thereto including without
limitation, electrical and other systems, fittings appliances and accessories of every nature
and kind, and includes all site preparation, excavation, filling and grading,
“Construction Sign” means a temporary sign promoting a construction or real estate
development project which may also be used to identify the owner, general contractor, sub-
trades, architect, engineers and others associated with the design, planning, development
and financing of a project under construction.
“Copy” means letters, characters, numbers or graphics making up the message on a sign.
“Copy Area” means the area within a square or rectangle or a combination of these figures,
which encloses all of the signs copy.
“Corner lot” means a lot at the intersection or junction of two or more highways.
“Council” means the Council of the City of Maple Ridge.
“Development Sign” means a sign required by the City to identify lands proposed for rezoning
or a sign indicating that a site is being developed for any commercial or industrial purposes
following Third Reading of a Zoning Amendment Bylaw for such change of zone. Temporary
signs shall not be permitted for this purpose.
“Directional Sign” means a sign which only communicates information regarding pedestrian
or vehicular movement on the lot on which the sign is located.
“Director of Planning” means the Director of Planning for the City of Maple Ridge or their
designate.
“Directory sign” means a sign that identifies the occupants of a building containing more
than one occupant.
4
“Election Sign” means a temporary sign promoting a political candidate, party, or cause in
relation to a federal, provincial, municipal or school trustee election or public referendum.
“Electronic Message Board Sign” means a sign in or on which the information that is
displayed can be changed automatically by means of the electronic switching of lamps or
illuminated tubes.
“Erected” means attached, altered, built, constructed, reconstructed, enlarged, or moved
and shall include painting of signs but does not include copy changes on any Changeable
Copy Sign.
“Façade” means the exterior face of a building upon which a sign is to be placed.
“Façade Area” shall mean the area of the front of the business premises, and calculated only
on the area parallel to the street measured from finished floor to finished ceiling and
between the inner face of the walls that separate the business premises from adjacent
businesses. Where there is no finished ceiling then measured to the underside of the lowest
portion of the floor or roof framing.
“Facia Sign” means a flat sign attached to a building or structural element of the building,
whether illuminated or not, running for its whole length parallel to the face of the wall to
which it is attached and not projecting more than 300 mm (1.0 foot) from the face of the wall
to which it is attached and which does not extend beyond the horizontal width nor above the
roof line of the building or business premises to which it is attached. A facia sign may consist
of individual letters or a continuous panel.
“Flag Sign” means a flag that represents an organization that is used as a sign but does not
include a flag representing a country of the world or any Province, Canadian territory or
municipal corporation.
“Flashing Sign” means an illuminated sign which contains flashing lights, which includes the
illusion of intermittent or flashing light, by means of animation or an externally mounted
intermittent light source exhibiting pronounced changes in light intensity or exhibits rapid
repetition of illumination, but does not include a Sign indicating only the time, date, or
temperature of electronically controlled messages.
“Freestanding Sign” means a sign which is entirely self-supporting and is neither attached to
nor forms part of a building or structure.
“Frontage” means the length of the common boundary shared by the front lot line of that lot
and a highway adjacent to the lot excluding a lane. On a corner lot, the frontage shall be the
shorter of the highway boundaries, regardless of the direction the buildings on the lot face.
“Front Lot Line” means the lot line common to a lot and an abutting highway excluding a
lane.
“Government Sign” means a sign authorized to be erected or placed within a highway or on a
lot, under the provisions of any statute, Order–in-Council, bylaw, resolution of Council or by
order of the Municipal Engineer, and includes, but is not limited to, traffic signs, signals, and
pavement markings, street name signs, neighborhood identifications signs, park
identification signs and public notice board signs.
5
“Grade” means the grade directly underneath the sign. Where a sign is located over a street,
the grade shall mean the elevation established by the City for the surface of the public
sidewalk or boulevard, excluding landscape berms and planter boxes.
“Height” of a sign means the vertical distance from grade to the highest part of the sign
which includes any portion of architectural or structural features of the supporting frame.
“Highway” means the area of every public right of way lying between two property lines title to
which area is vested in the City and which is designated or intended for or used by the
general public for the passage of vehicles or persons and means the area of every public
right of way lying within any City Park title to which area is vested in the City and which is
designated or intended for or used by the general public for the passage of vehicles. This
includes a street, road, lane, bridge, viaduct and any other way open to public use, but does
not include a private right of way on private property
“Highway Encroachment Agreement” means an agreement entered into between an
individual or company and the City to allow signs within a highway right of way.
“Home Occupation Sign” means a non-illuminated sign attached to the dwelling or accessory
structure which indicates that a home occupation business, as permitted by Maple Ridge
Zoning Bylaw, is conducted within the dwelling or accessory structure on the property where
the sign is located provided a valid business licence for such business has been issued by
the City.
“Identification Sign” means a sign which contains no advertising but is limited to the name,
address and number of a building, institution or person and to the activity carried on in the
building or institution or person or the occupation of the person.
“Illuminated Sign” means a sign designed to give forth any artificial light, either directly from
a source of light incorporated in or connected with such sign, or indirectly from an artificial
source, so shielded that no direct illumination from it is visible elsewhere than on the site
itself.
“Logo” means a symbolic representation, not including any words, names or numbers unless
part of a registered trademark, which is used exclusively to simplify advertising of a product,
business, service or activity and which contains no additional identification, information or
message.
“Lot” means “parcel” as defined under the Land Title Act, including a bare land strata lot, but
excluding a lot created under the Condominium Act.
“Lot Line” means any line which forms the boundary of a Lot.
“Maximum Height” means the vertical distance measured from grade to the highest part of
such sign. In the case of a roof sign, the maximum height shall be measured from the roof or
parapet level at the location of sign placement which includes any and all architectural and
structural design and detailing elements.
“Minimum Clearance” means the vertical distance measured from grade to the lower limit of
such sign, sign structure or architectural element.
Use the definition from the highway and traffic bylaw “ Document is currently called “Awning or Canopy License Agreement
6
“Municipal Engineer” means the Municipal Engineer for the City or their designate.
“Mural” means a pictorial representation other than a logo or graffiti, painted on a building or
structure, which is entirely decorative and does not identify or depict a land use, a business,
the name of a person or place, or the sale of a product or service.
“Open House Sign” means a temporary sign, which advertises the location of a property for
sale at which an open house is to be held.
“Permanent Sign” means a sign which is affixed to or constructed as part of a building
structure or in the case of a free standing sign, mounted on a permanent base, column or
pole that is attached to or sunk into the ground of the lot on which the business is operating.
“Portable Free Standing Sign” means a sign for business or information purposes, which can
be readily moved from place to place and which is not affixed to a building, permanent
structure or to the ground, and may include a sandwich board sign or Temporary sign.
“Portable Sign” means a sign not fixed to the land or to a building or structure and may
include a Banner sign provided the maximum sign area does not exceed 1.2 metres by 2.4
meters (4x8 feet).
“Premises” means an area of land including its buildings and appurtenances.
“Prohibitive Sign” means a sign that provides a warning, prohibition or penalty respecting the
site or premises on which it is located, such as “No Entry” “Danger” “Keep Out” or similar
such signs.
“Professionals Building” is a building containing primarily office uses such as doctors,
dentist, lawyers, architect, engineers and similar type professions.
“Premises” means an area of land including its buildings and appurtenances.
“Projecting Sign” means a sign, other than a canopy or facia sign, which projects
perpendicular to the building face more than 300mm (1 foot) from the façade of any building
or structure.
“Pump Island Canopy” means a canopy built to shelter fuels at a gasoline bar or gasoline
service station and a pump island canopy that is L-shaped or angularly-connected shall be
considered to be one pump island canopy.
“Pump Island Canopy Sign” means a sign attached to or constructed as part of a gasoline bar
or gasoline service station pump island canopy.
“Real Estate Sign” means a temporary sign indicating that a parcel of land or property or
premises on which the sign is located is available for rent, lease or sale.
“Revolving Sign” means any sign or portion of a sign, all or part of which revolves or rotates,
or partly revolves or rotates, but does not include animated signs.
7
“Roof” means the top enclosure of a building that does not slope more than 60 degrees from
the horizontal. A portion that slopes more than 60 degrees will be considered a façade if the
area behind contains a business premises.
“Roof line” means the horizontal line made by the intersection of the wall of the building with
the top of the roofing covering or parapet of the building. In the case of a building with a
pitched roof, the roof line shall be at the level of the eaves.
“Roof Sign” means any sign erected or placed wholly or partly above the top of the roof line
of a building.
“Sandwich Board Sign” means a one or two faced non-illuminated sign located within a
municipal highway right of way that has been approved by the Municipal engineer.
“Sign” means any structure, device, advertisement, advertising device, graphic, display or
visual representation that is visible from any street, highway, lane or private property, used
to advertise, identify, or communicate information or attract the attention of the public for
any purpose and without limiting the generality of the forgoing includes any symbols, letter,
figures, illustrations or painted forms, but does not include a flag, mural, traffic control
device, or any element which is an integral part of the design of a building.
“Sign Area” means the total area within the outer edge of the frame or border of a sign.
Where a sign has no frame, border or background the areas of the sign shall be the area
contained within the shortest line surrounding the whole group of letters, figures or symbols
of such sign. Except as hereinafter provided, each side or face of a multi-faced sign shall be
counted in computing the sign area thereof. If a side or face of a multi-faced sign cannot be
seen by a person not on the lot where the sign has been erected, it shall not be counted in
computing the sign area thereof.
“Sign Owner” means the person, or his or her authorized agent in lawful control of a sign.
“Sign Permit” means a sign permit issued pursuant to this Bylaw.
“Special Event Sign” means a temporary sign indicating that a community event or activity is
taking place, or is being carried on and excludes third party advertising.
“Temporary Sign” means a sign, whether or not it is electrified, which may be moved or
removed and is in place for a limited period of time.
“Third Party Advertising” means a sign advertising a business, merchandise, service or
activity which is not sold, produced, manufactured, furnished or performed on the lot on
which the sign is located.
“Under Awning Sign” means a sign suspended from, and entirely under, an awning.
“Under Canopy sign” means a sign suspended from, and entirely under, a canopy.
“Vehicle Sign” means any sign or signs attached to or painted on or otherwise attached to a
vehicle where the principle purpose of the vehicle is to serve as a sign or a sign support
structure.
8
“Wall Sign” means a sign which is painted on or attached generally parallel to a building
facade and includes permanent signs installed inside a window which are intended to be
viewed from the outside.
“Window Sign” means a sign painted on or attached to, mounted or suspended behind or
installed on a window for viewing from outside the business premises but excludes seasonal
holiday lighting and decorations, hours of business, street addresses, telephone numbers,
accreditation signs and credit card logos.
Part 5 Interpretation
5.1 Metric units of measurement are used for all measurements in this Bylaw. The use of
Imperial measurements in this Bylaw is for convenience purposes only. Should there be a
dispute the valid measurement defaults to metric.
Part 6 General Provisions
6.1 No person shall set up, exhibit, erect, place, alter, move or maintain a sign in the City except
those permitted by and in conformance with this Bylaw. A valid sign or demolition permit
shall be obtained prior to the set-up, exhibition, erection, placing, altering, maintaining or
demolition of a sign pursuant to this Bylaw. Changeable copy signs and electronic message
board signs are not considered altered by virtue only of the message being changed.
6.2 The issuance and subsequent approval of any sign permit does not relieve the owner of said
sign from ensuring the sign continues to comply with the provisions of this bylaw. Should any
sign become non-compliant with this bylaw any sign permits and subsequent approvals shall
be void and it shall be as if a permit was never issued, and the enforcement provisions of this
bylaw shall be in effect.
6.3 The design of every sign shall be aesthetically pleasing and shall not detract from the
architectural integrity of any building or structure to which it is attached, or beside which it is
located.
6.4 The arrangement and grouping of signs on a building shall be integrated with the architecture
of said building.
6.5 The determination of clauses 6.3 & 6.4 may require an application to the planning
department where the building has been constructed under a development permit.
6.6 Structural supports, bracing and ties for signs shall be kept to a minimum number,
consistent with structural adequacy and as much as possible shall be concealed within the
body of the sign itself.
6.7 All signs together with their supporting structures and any electrical equipment shall be kept
fully operable, in good repair and maintained in a safe and clean condition.
6.8 No sign shall be erected, rebuilt, enlarged, extended, relocated or attached to, suspended
from, or supported on any structure or the lands on a lot unless the sign fully complies with
the provisions of the Maple Ridge Building Bylaw and this Bylaw.
9
6.9 No sign shall be erected or lit in such a manner as to interfere with the visibility or safe
operation of a traffic control device or to interfere with motorist visibility at an access to or
egress from a highway or so as to be unsafe to the public in the vicinity of such sign.
6.10 Any sign erected in contravention to this Bylaw may be removed at the expense of the owner,
applicant or lessee.
6.11 Signs not specifically permitted or referenced in this Bylaw are prohibited.
6.12 Nothing in this Bylaw shall be taken to relieve any persons from complying with the
provisions of any other Bylaw of the City.
6.13 This Bylaw applies to the entire area of the City.
6.14 No sign, canopy or structural element for the support or protection of a sign shall have
affixed to or contain any flashing, animated, rotating, moving or oscillating electrical
components, except for electronic message boards unless expressly permitted in this Bylaw.
6.15 A permit may be issued for either one banner sign or one portable freestanding sign per lot,
at any one time, but not both at the same time.
6.16 Signs projecting over a pedestrian area shall have a minimum clearance of at least 2.4 m
(8.0 ft) above grade, while signs projecting over an area frequented by vehicular traffic shall
have a minimum clearance of at least 4.2 m (13.8 ft) above grade. No sign shall project over
the travelled portion of a highway.
6.17 The illumination for any sign shall not create a direct glare upon any surrounding lot or
highway.
6.18 Any sign unlawfully occupying a portion of a highway or public place may be removed by a
Bylaw Compliance Officer. The fees for recovery of the sign are set out in Schedule “D” of
this bylaw. Signs not recovered within fourteen (14) days of impoundment may be disposed
of by the City.
6.19 Directory signs are only permitted to be installed within a building.
6.20 Professionals building are to be identified by a building name only whether installed on the
building or a freestanding sign.
6.21 All signs are to be located on the premises to which they pertain.
6.22 No signs shall create a real or potential hazard to the safe, efficient movement of vehicular or
pedestrian traffic.
6.23 No sign shall be placed in a manner that may obstruct any window opening, door opening,
passageway, fire escape, walkway, vehicular driveway or similar feature.
6.24 Where hoarding is erected on any street during the construction or alteration of a building, no
signs other than those relating to the said construction or alteration shall be placed upon the
said fence or hoarding.
10
Part 7 Exemption
7.1 This Bylaw does not apply to:
(a) notices issued by the government of Canada, the government of British
Columbia, a Court, by the City or by the School Board;
(b) traffic control devices provided for in the Motor Vehicle Act;
(c) signs erected by the Provincial Ministry of Highways for highways purposes.
These signs may be flashing and/or illuminated where special circumstances or
safety dictates;
(d) signs on or over City highways installed or authorized by the Municipal Engineer
for control of traffic and parking or for street names and direction;
(e) Development Signs required by the City during the processing of development
applications,
(f) signs located in the interior of buildings and not visible from a highway
including directory signs;
(g) murals provided that the mural does not advertise or intend to advertise a
specific product or service and they are located on public use buildings or on
properties where a Development Permit specifically permits such use;
(h) public art provided that the public art has been authorized by the city under a
separate agreement and the public art is located on public use buildings or on
properties owned or authorized through said agreement;
(i) non-illuminated signs inside a store window limited to providing the following
information:
(i) store hours;
(ii) whether the store is open or closed; or
(iii) the existence of a sale, where the sign is present for not more than thirty
(30) consecutive days in any one (1) six (6) month period three (3) month
period;
(j) display of goods inside store windows or inside store fronts;
(k) flags and emblems of civic, or non-profit societies, educational, religious
organizations;
(l) signs authorized by the Municipal Engineer in connection with public
conveniences including signs on benches, bus stop shelters, and other similar
structures;
(m) signs containing the building number and street name only, provided the sign
area does not exceed 0.18 sq. m. (2 sq. ft.) and the numbers or lettering shall
not exceed 20 cm (8 in) in height;
(n) the Flag of Canada or the Flag of British Columbia;
(o) a sign required by law including prohibitive signs;
(p) home occupation signs provided they are not larger than 0.18 sq. m. (2 sq. ft.)
and are attached to the dwelling or building where the home occupation
business is operated from;
11
(q) signs depicting danger, hazard or other safety conditions erected by an
individual authorized by a public agency in the performance of his or her duty;
(r) memorial plaque, historical tablet and similar markers provided it does not
exceed 2.2 sq. m. (24 sq. ft.) in area and 2.4 m (8 ft.) in height;
(s) neighbourhood watch or block parent sign;
(t) permanent subdivision identification sign such as an entry gate sign provided
the sign is authorized by a Development Permit or by the Approving Officer at
the time of subdivision approval;
(u) signs erected by the City for municipal purposes;
(v) sponsorship signs (for the purpose of acknowledging sponsors but not for
advertising sponsor’s products) erected by the City’s Parks & Recreation
Department and/or Community Groups provided the sign area does not exceed
3.0 sq. m. (32 sq. ft.);
(w) window sign provided the sign does not cover more than 50% (fifty percent) of
the window area facing a single elevation of the business premises to which
they pertain;
(x) banner sign used by the City and non-profit and community organizations for
special event and fund raising activities, provided the Banner is used
exclusively for:
(i) promotion of a special event for a period of no longer than thirty (30)
consecutive days in a six (6) month period;
(ii) street beautification purposes in the City’s downtown core;
(iii) the sign area of the banner does not exceed 2.2 sq. m. (24 sq. ft.) and
(iv) the banner receives City approval prior to the erection of such sign.
(y) temporary sign advertising a special event for a community cause or charitable
fund raising campaign not exceeding in area of 2.2 sq. m. (24 sq. ft.);
(z) temporary sign advertising an opening date of a place of business or a change
of proprietorship provided:
(i) the sign area does not exceed 2.2 sq. m. (24 sq. ft.) and;
(ii) the display of the sign is limited to no more than 30 (thirty) consecutive
days;
(aa) City of Maple Ridge welcome signs or transit information signs;
(bb) vehicle signs except when the vehicle is stationary and visible from a highway
for a period in excess of four (4) hours.
(cc) “Beware of Dog”, “No Trespassing”, “No Discharging of Firearms” and “No
Dumping” signs, and signs warning the public of existence of danger provided
none of the signs exceed 0.2 sq. m. in area and do not exceed 1.2m (4 ft.) in
height.
12
Part 8 Prohibited Signs
8.1 Signs that are not expressly permitted or exempted by this bylaw are hereby prohibited.
8.2 Without restricting or limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following signs are
specifically prohibited:
8.2.1 Any flashing, animated or chasing-border signs, digital videos or moving signs of
any kind (other than the plainly illuminated hands of a clock or temperature
indication), or any sign in respect of which any part thereof is flashing, animated or
moving. This subsection applies to any strobe light or other devices which have
emissions whether emitting sound, odour or other matter except as specifically
permitted under this bylaw;
8.2.2 Pennants, bunting, flags (other than patriotic flags), balloons or other inflatable
devices;
8.2.3 Banner signs except as specifically permitted under this bylaw;
8.2.4 Roof signs, balcony signs and signs mounted or supported above the canopies roof
line except as specifically permitted under this bylaw;
8.2.5 Any signs that obstruct any part of a doorway, balcony, or a window that would
otherwise be capable of opening;
8.2.6 Off-premises or third party advertising signs except where specifically provided for
elsewhere in this bylaw;
8.2.7 Election signs are prohibited on any municipal park land or buildings owned or
leased by the City.
8.2.8 Any open tube neon sign except;
(a) those exempted pursuant this Bylaw;
(b) those permitted by a Development Permit;
(c) those permitted inside windows of a business premises pursuant to this Bylaw;
8.2.9 any sign on the side of any facia, awning or canopy;
8.2.10 signs recessed in canopies or awnings above fuel dispensing facilities;
8.2.11 flashing sign, except as permitted under Part 7 of this bylaw;
8.2.12 roof signs;
8.2.13 portable signs, excluding sandwich-board signs except as specifically permitted
under this bylaw;
8.2.14 revolving signs, except as permitted under Part 7 of this bylaw;
8.2.15 billboard signs;
13
8.2.16 gas or other inflated signs supported from the ground or roof by rope or wire line;
8.2.17 no signs, whether made out of paper, cardboard, cloth, canvas, plastic or similar
materials, shall be tacked, posted or otherwise affixed to the walls of any structure,
tree, pole, hydrant, bridge, fence or any other surface within a public place. This
section shall not apply to banners, posters, placards, or notices posted by or on
behalf of the City pertaining to municipal matters, or police traffic control signs and
notices; and
8.2.18 any other sign not specifically permitted or mentioned under this Bylaw.
Part 9 Non-Conforming Signs
9.1 Any sign or advertisement lawfully erected, constructed or placed prior to the adoption of this
Bylaw, although such sign does not conform with the provisions of this Bylaw, may remain
and continue to be used and maintained, provided however, that no such sign shall be
reconstructed, altered or moved in the City unless such sign shall be made to conform in all
respects with the provisions of this Bylaw.
Part 10 Maintenance of Signs
10.1 Every sign shall be maintained in good repair and in a neat and safe condition at all times.
10.2 Normal sign maintenance including lighting and refurbishing of signs shall not require a Sign
Permit but shall conform to all other requirements of this Bylaw.
10.3 All signs shall be maintained structurally sound and free from all hazards caused or resulting
from decay or failure of structural members, fixtures, lighting or appurtenances. All sign
area, background, copy and lighting shall be maintained in readable and clean condition and
the site of the sign shall be maintained free of weeds, debris and rubbish.
Part 11 Sign Permits and Fees
11.1 Requirements for a Permit
11.1.1 Every person proposing to construct, erect, place, alter, rebuild, reconstruct,
replace, move, demolish or remove a sign shall obtain a sign permit as if required
by this Bylaw, and all necessary approvals as required by the Maple Ridge Building
Bylaw and Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw and Maple Ridge Highways and Traffic Bylaw
and Maple Ridge Parking Bylaw
11.2 Application Requirements
11.2.1 An application for a sign permit shall be made to the Building Department and
shall:
(a) be made in the form provided by the Chief Building Official;
(b) be signed by the property owner or their agent;
(c) be accompanied by the required sign permit fees as set out in Schedule A to
14
this bylaw;
(d) where electrical work is required include the electrical permit application and
associated electrical permit fee;
(e) specify:
(i) the street address of the premises and legal description of the lot on
which the proposed sign will be located;
(ii) the name and address of the owner of the business premises or lot or the
company for whose benefit the sign is intended and where the application
is made by an agent of the owner or company, the name and address of
the agent;
(iii) if the installer is other than the applicant, include installers information
under “contractor information” on application form;
(f) be accompanied by 2 original sets of drawings specifying:
(i) site plan of lot showing existing and proposed setbacks, in accordance
with the City’s Zoning Bylaw, of all existing and proposed structures and
signs. Survey may be required;
(ii) scaled drawings showing location, type, size, construction, colour, finishing
material and estimated costs of all proposed signs, or proposed changes
to existing signs and supporting structures;
(iii) cross section of the sign showing details of how the sign is to be attached
to the building or supporting structure.
(iv) scaled drawings showing the dimensions of the sign and the dimensions
of the façade area to which it is attached;
(v) the dimensions of the supporting structure of the sign;
(vi) the maximum height and minimum clearance of the sign from grade;
(vii) the off-street parking area, parking lot aisles, site access points, on-site
directional signs and driveways, where applicable to the sign type;
(viii) the dimensions and area of any proposed landscaped areas, if applicable
to the sign type;
(ix) The dimensions and area calculations of all copy of the proposed sign;
(x) for an illuminated sign, information on the technical means by which the
illumination is to be accomplished;
(xi) where the sign is to be attached to an existing building, a current
photograph of the façade to which the sign is to be attached;
(xii) structural, footing details and material specifications for proposed
freestanding signs;
(g) the Chief Building Official will require all freestanding signs to be sealed by a
structural engineer with the applicable Building Code Letters of Assurance
included as part of the submission.
(h) All new facia signs, awnings, canopies being mounted to or supported by the
building will require drawings sealed by a structural engineer with the BC
15
Building Code Letters of Assurance.
(i) all signs where their mounting system penetrates the building envelope and the
building was constructed under the supervision of a registered professional
taking responsibility for the building envelope, shall have the connections
reviewed and approved by a Registered Professional to ensure the building
envelope is not compromised.
(j) any other information that is relevant to the issuance of the sign permit.
11.3 Permit Fees
As per Schedule “A” of this Bylaw.
11.4 Permit Expiry
Where application has been made for a permit and the proposed work set out in the
application conforms to this and all other bylaws of the City’s and the British Columbia
Building Code the Building Department shall issue a Sign Permit for which the application is
made. The permit shall expire if active work at the site is not commenced and inspected
within a period of ninety (90) days from the date of issue of the permit.
11.5 Refusal of Permit
11.5.1 The Chief Building Official may refuse to issue a permit if:
(a) the information submitted for the Sign Permit is contrary to the provisions of
this bylaw;
(b) the information required to be submitted under this bylaw is incomplete or
incorrect;
(c) issuance is prohibited by or does not comply with the provisions of a Municipal
Bylaw, the British Columbia Building Code or the specification of the “Canadian
Electrical Code” adopted by the Canadian Standards Association;
(d) the sign does not comply with a development permit issued to a property where
the sign is to be installed; or
(e) the sign creates a potential hazard to the safe efficient movement of vehicular
or pedestrian traffic.
11.5.2 Notwithstanding any clause in this bylaw, if any work for which a permit is required
by this bylaw has been commenced before the permit has been issued by the City,
the applicant shall pay the City a permit fee that is equal to 2 (two) times the
permit fee described in Schedule A – Sign Permit Fees of this bylaw.
Part 12 Inspections and Regulations
12.1 Inspections for Compliance
12.1.1 The Chief Building Official or any other official of the City is hereby authorized to
enter at all reasonable times on any property, building or premises that is subject
to regulation under this bylaw to ascertain whether the regulations and provisions
16
of the bylaw are being or have been complied with and any person employed from
time to time by the City as the Chief Building Official, Bylaw Compliance Officer or
Building Official is hereby designated to act in their place for the purpose of
administering this Bylaw.
12.1.2 The Building Official and Bylaw Compliance Officer and their respective designates
have the authority to order the painting, repair, alteration, clean-up or removal of
signs which have become deteriorated, dilapidated, abandoned or which constitute
a hazard to public safety.
12.1.3 Where necessary, the projecting cantilever system shall be used to support signs,
and in no case shall the “A” frame system be used.
12.1.4 No sign, nor any guy, stay, or attachment thereto shall be erected, placed or
maintained by any person on rocks, fences or trees, except in the case of
temporary signs complying with the requirements of this Bylaw and decorative logo
designs painted upon or affixed to a temporary construction fence or hoarding
erected on a construction site only, for a time period not exceeding the period of
construction.
12.1.5 No sign, guy, stay or attachment thereto shall interfere with any electric light,
power, telephone or telegraph wires, or the supports thereof.
12.1.6 Every sign and the immediate surrounding premises shall be maintained by the
owner or person in charge thereof in a clean, sanitary and inoffensive condition
and be free and clear of all obnoxious substances, rubbish and weeds.
12.1.7 A Building Official may order the correction of any work which is being or has been
improperly done under a permit.
12.1.8 A Building Official may order the cessation of work that is proceeding in
contravention of this bylaw by the placing of a “Stop Work Order” on the building,
sign or elsewhere as appropriate on the lot on which the contravening work is
taking place.
12.1.9 It shall be unlawful for any person to continue to work once a Stop Work Order has
been issued.
12.1.10 It shall be unlawful for any person to tamper with, deface or remove a Stop Work
Order once it has been placed on the property by the Building Official.
12.2 Special Approvals
12.2.1 No sign, awning or canopy shall be displayed upon or suspended over any Highway
or public place unless the owner has entered into a Municipal Encroachment
License Agreement with the City and has deposited a comprehensive general
liability insurance policy for limits of not less than five million dollars ($5,000,000)
inclusive and duly endorsed to note the insured’s acceptance of contractual liability
under the “Hold Harmless” clause in the Municipal Encroachment License
Agreement and further endorsed to note such policy will not be lapsed or cancelled
without thirty days written notice to the City as long as the named insured’s sign
remains on or over any highway. A copy of each renewal certificate shall be
17
deposited with the City as a condition for the continued display of such sign.
12.2.2 In the event that the owner shall fail or neglect to provide the insurance coverage
required by this section, it shall be lawful for the City to forthwith and without prior
notice, order the owner to remove such sign which is erected on private premises
but encroaches onto or over a highway or public place and the said sign shall be
removed forthwith, and in default thereof by such owner, it shall be lawful for the
Municipal Engineer with such employees or agents of the City as he may deem
requisite, to enter upon the said premises and effect such removal at the expense
of the person in default, and the City shall recover the expense thereof, with
interest at the rate of six (6) percentage per annum, with costs in like manner as
Municipal Taxes on the said premises.
12.2.3 Every such owner shall remain fully responsible for all losses, costs, damages or
expenses which may arise as the result of the display of said sign until such time as
the same has been removed.
12.2.4 Construction signs for the purposes of identifying the location of a development
and are not located on the premises to which they pertain are only permitted under
the approval of the municipal engineer and are to comply with Clause 6.9 and sub-
clauses 12.2.1 to 12.2.3 of this bylaw.
12.3 Removal of Signs
12.3.1 The owner of any lot upon which an abandoned sign is located shall remove such
sign within fifteen (15) days of the same becoming an abandoned sign.
12.3.2 The Chief Building Official, Bylaw Compliance Officer or their designate may remove
from public property any sign installed or placed without a valid permit.
12.3.3 Recovery costs for impounded signs are as per Schedule D of this bylaw.
12.4 Comprehensive Sign Plan
12.4.1 Any development site in any Commercial or Industrial zoned lot that is comprised of
a number of individual businesses forming a comprehensive development unit may
make application for comprehensive sign plan approval. Such a plan, which shall
include the location, size, height, colour, lighting and orientation of all signs, and
shall be submitted for approval to the Chief Building Official or their designate.
12.4.2 Such a comprehensive plan shall comply with the overall sign area and density
regulations of the bylaw and shall result in an improved relationship between the
various parts of the plan.
18
12.5 Development Permit Areas
12.5.1 On lands which have been designated Development Permit Areas, sign regulations
contained in this Bylaw may be varied through the application and approval of a
Development Variance Permit by Council. The erection of a new sign or the
replacement, alteration or modification of an existing sign (a sign permitted and
constructed through a Development Permit) which has been included in an existing
Development Permit, shall require an amendment to the Development Permit.
12.5.2 All buildings submitted for a Development Permit are to include the type, size and
location of all signage for the development. This signage is to comply with this
bylaw and any other bylaws referenced here in.
12.6 Variance
12.6.1 Variances to the provision of this Bylaw may be granted by Council through a
Development Variance Permit in accordance with the City of Maple Ridge
Zoning Bylaw.
Part 13 Specific Sign Regulations
The following regulations apply specifically to the types of signs referred to in each section
heading. For sign size and area calculations please see the Schedules “E” thru “J” appended
to this bylaw.
13.1 Awning signs:
13.1.1 shall be permitted in Commercial, Industrial and Public Service zones;
13.1.2 shall not be electrified;
13.1.3 may only be lighted from within the awning structure;
13.1.4 shall have the same sign copy area as that permitted in Section 13.3 of this bylaw
for requirements of facia signs;
13.1.5 shall have a minimum clearance of 2.5 metres (8.2 feet) from grade immediately
below the sign and shall not project below the lower edge of the awning;
13.1.6 shall be no higher than the roof line of the building to which it is affixed;
13.1.7 Under awning signs are permitted to a maximum area 0.28 square metres (3.0
square feet) and shall comply with 13.1.6 for minimum clearance.
13.1.8 Only one under awning sign is permitted per business premises.
13.1.9 Under awning signs are only intended to direct the attention of pedestrian traffic to
a business and are not intended to be directly illuminated.
19
13.2 Canopy Signs
13.2.1 Shall be permitted in Commercial, Industrial and Public Service zones;
13.2.2 shall have a minimum clearance of 2.5 metres (8.2 feet) from grade immediately
below the sign and shall not project below the lower edge of the canopy;
13.2.3 The maximum sign area shall be 0.6 square metres (6.5 square feet) per lineal
metre of canopy for the business premises to which it is affixed and a maximum
copy area of sixty (60) percent of the sign area.
13.2.4 For theatres and cinemas, the maximum sign area shall be 1.6 square metres
(17.2 square feet) per lineal metre of the business premises canopy to which it is
affixed and a maximum copy area of sixty (60) percent of the sign area, but in no
case shall the sign area exceed 60% of the canopy area to which the sign is affixed.
13.2.5 No canopy sign shall extend or project above the upper edge of a canopy or
marquee by more than 600mm (2.0 feet)
13.2.6 The vertical dimension of a canopy sign shall not exceed 600mm (2.0 feet). For
theatres and cinemas the maximum shall be 1.5 metres (4.9 feet).
13.2.7 Under Canopy signs are permitted to a maximum area 0.28 square metres (3.0
square feet) and shall comply with 13.2.2 for minimum clearance.
13.2.8 Only one under canopy sign is permitted per business premises.
13.2.9 Under Canopy signs are only intended to direct the attention of pedestrian traffic to
a business and are not intended to be directly illuminated.
13.3 Facia Signs
13.3.1 Only the façade of the business premises on which the sign is located shall be used
for sign area calculations.
13.3.2 A facia sign shall not project more than 300 mm (1.0 feet) beyond the building face
and shall not extend above the sill of any window or above guard rails or
balustrades immediately above such signs.
13.3.3 The minimum clearance of a facia sign shall be 2.5 metres (8.2 feet) from grade
immediately below the sign; provided however, that this subsection does not apply
to:
(a) Facia signs created by printing, painting or inscribing directly upon a wall of a
building or where the facia does not project more than 2.54cm (1 inch) beyond
the façade of the building;
(b) Facia signs situated entirely over private property and immediately above a
permanently landscaped area;
(c) Facia signs entirely recessed into the wall to which they are affixed;
13.3.4 No part of a facia sign shall project above the roof line of the wall to which it is
affixed.
20
13.4 Changeable Copy sign
13.4.1 shall be permitted on all “C”, “CS” & “H” zoned lots;
(a) if installed as part of a facia sign:
(i) does not have a sign or copy area in excess of that permitted for a
facia sign as determined under schedules G, H & I of this bylaw;
(b) if installed as part of a freestanding sign:
(i) shall be sized in compliance with schedule G, H & I of this bylaw and shall
form an integral part of the freestanding sign;
(ii) does not display any advertising relating to a business, commodity,
service or entertainment which is conducted, sold or offered
elsewhere than on the lot or premises on which the changeable copy
sign is located;
(iii) is not placed within 7.5 metres of an abutting lot, if that lot is
located in an agricultural or residential zone; and
(iv) Where permanent changeable copy signs are installed, no portable free
standing signs are permitted or
(c) Are prohibited as part of an under canopy sign or under-awning sign.
13.5 Freestanding Signs
13.5.1 The minimum clearance of a freestanding sign shall be 2.5 metres (8.2 feet)
provided, however, that freestanding signs may be less than 2.5 metres (8.2 feet)
from grade where:
(a) they are situated on or over land other than that used from time to time as a
place for the parking of automobiles or used as a driveway;
(b) such signs do not obscure the view from a road or sidewalk or other premises
in the vicinity; and
(c) where such signs are an integral part of a permanent comprehensibly designed
landscaped area, such landscaping to be in size equal to that of the sign and
shall fully contain the entire length and width of the sign.
13.5.2 Where a freestanding sign projects over a vehicular traffic area such as parking lot
aisles or driveways, a minimum clearance of 4.2 metres (13.8 feet) shall be
maintained. Where the vehicle traffic area serves as the fire department access
route this minimum clearance shall be increased to 5 metres (14.60 ft).
13.5.3 The maximum height of a freestanding sign shall be 10.5 metres (34.5 feet).
13.5.4 A freestanding sign may be located in a required yard provided that such sign does
not obstruct vehicle site lines when entering or exiting the lot and that no portion of
the freestanding sign is closer than 1.5 metres (4.9 feet) to:
(a) the point of intersection of the intersecting property lines on a corner lot;
21
(b) any adjoining lot;
(c) any lot line, and
(d) any site access or exit points.
13.5.5 For each freestanding sign, landscaping around the base of the sign on the site
shall be provided as follows:
(a) 1 sq. m. (10 sq. ft.) of landscaping for every 1 sq. m.(10 sq. ft.) of sign copy;
and
(b) 0.2 sq. m. (2.2 sq. ft.) of landscaping for every 0.1 metres (4 inches) in height
above 3 metres (9.8 feet).
13.5.6 For a freestanding sign, no guy wires shall be used. The support structure shall
form an integral part of the design.
13.6 Projecting Signs
13.6.1 The minimum clearance of a projecting sign shall be 2.5 metres (8.2 feet) from
grade immediately below the sign.
13.6.2 The maximum area of a projecting sign shall be seven (7) square metres (75.4
square feet) and the copy area of the sign shall not exceed sixty (60) percent of the
sign area.
13.6.3 No part of a projecting sign shall project above the roof line of the wall to which it is
affixed. except that the surrounding structure may extend 300mm (1.0 foot) above
the parapet or roof line of a building provided the surrounding structure is not being
used to calculate allowable copy area.
13.6.4 A projecting sign is not to be located any closer than 1.5 metres (4.9 feet) to the
inner face of the walls that separate the business premises from an adjacent
business premises.
13.6.5 The projecting sign may project 250mm (10 inches) from the façade for each
metre that the sign is located from the nearest edge or corner of the business
premises to which the sign pertains. In no case shall the projection exceed 1.5
metres (4.9 feet) beyond the façade to which it is affixed.
13.7 Portable Freestanding Sign
13.7.1 One (1) portable freestanding sign identifying a business may be permitted per
legal lot provided that:
(a) where a legal lot is comprised of a number of strata lots, only one sign is
permitted for the parent legal lot;
(b) the sign is no larger than 3 square metres (32.3 square feet) in area per sign
face;
(c) the sign shall not be located on any highway;
22
(d) no portable freestanding sign shall be energized by any means other than that
approved under the BC Electrical Code.
13.7.2 Portable Freestanding Signs pertaining to community campaigns, drives or events
are subject to a permit as per Schedule C of this Bylaw.
13.7.3 A Portable Freestanding Sign shall be permitted for one thirty (30) day consecutive
time period in a ninety (90) day period.
13.7.4 Any Portable Freestanding Signs up for longer than the permitted thirty (30) days
may be removed at the owner’s expense.
13.7.5 Any Portable Freestanding Signs placed on public right-of-way may be removed at
the owner’s expense without prior notification to the owner.
13.7.6 The conditions set out in section 13.7 of this bylaw do not apply to City sanctioned
event advertising.
13.8 Electronic Message Board Sign
13.8.1 Electronic Message Board Signs shall be permitted to a maximum area of three (3)
square metres (32.3 square feet) per sign face in addition to the allowable Sign
Area for the primary Freestanding Sign in those zones identified in Schedule B of
this bylaw.
13.8.2 Electronic Message Board Signs are only permitted to be attached to a building’s
façade when there are no freestanding signs.
13.8.3 Electronic Message Board Signs are not permitted on secondary Freestanding
Signs on the same lot.
13.8.4 Where permanent Electronic Message Board Signs are installed, no portable or
changeable copy signs are permitted.
13.8.5 Any area exceeding the above mentioned three (3) square metres (32.3 square
feet) shall be included in the total calculation for sign area of the primary
freestanding sign.
13.8.6 Electronic Message Board Signs are not permitted to have predominantly white
backgrounds, are required to have a minimum 5 second image transition and are
to comply with the advertising code of ethics.
13.8.7 Electronic Message Board Signs are not permitted to display any animated
characters, digital videos or display information in a format that is typical to a
commercial that would be viewed on a television.
13.9 On Site Directional Signs
13.9.1 One (1) sign not exceeding 0.75 square metres (8.0 square feet) per side shall be
permitted at each entrance and exit from a property in addition to signs permitted
in Schedule B of this bylaw.
23
13.10 Menu Board Signs
13.10.1 One (1) exterior menu board sign per drive through lane, not exceeding a total sign
area of 3.0 square metres (32.2 square feet) shall be permitted for drive-through
restaurant type businesses in addition to signs permitted in Schedule B of this
bylaw.
13.11 Election Signs
13.11.1 Election Signs for federal, provincial, municipal and school trustee elections are
permitted provided that:
(a) in the case of provincial or federal elections, the signs are not erected more
than thirty (30) days prior to the election or event and are removed within four
(4) days after the election;
(b) in the case of municipal and school trustee elections, the signs are not erected
more than twenty (20) days prior to the general local election or event and are
removed within four (4) days after the election;
(c) the sign size does not exceed 1.48 square metres (16 square feet). This is for
any single sign or combination of signs that when viewed together form a single
message but when viewed independently provide no single cohesive message;
(d) the maximum height of the election sign, above grade, does not exceed 2.44
metres (8 feet) and the minimum clearance above grade is not less than 0.305
metres (1 foot).
(e) the maximum number of election signs permitted per candidate is 300 (three
hundred);
(f) the maximum number of election signs that are the size set out in section (c )
per candidate is 100 (one hundred);
(g) the sign is not illuminated;
(h) the placement of the sign does not interfere with traffic sightlines at street
intersections or with the safety of pedestrians.
(i) the placement of signs are permitted on private property with the consent of
the owner or occupant of the property;
(j) Elections Signs are not permitted on any vehicles or trailers attached to
vehicles or any roof top or any existing sign, with the exception of magnetic
vehicle signs;
(k) Election signs are prohibited on any municipal park land or buildings owned or
leased by the city;
(l) regulations regarding the size, placement and permitted dates for posting
Election Signs apply to those posted on private property as well as public;
24
(m) the Bylaw Compliance Officer, or their designate, may remove any election sign
that the Bylaw Compliance Officer has reasonable grounds to believe is
erected, placed or installed in contravention of municipal Bylaws;
(n) Election signs that have been removed in accordance with clause ‘n’ above will
be stored for a period of four (4) days and the candidate or their agent may
claim the sign(s) during that period, following which the material may be
destroyed or otherwise disposed of by the City. The Candidate or their Agent
will be notified of the compliance issue with the sign and where the sign can be
claimed; and
(o) other than as authorized in writing by the City, no person shall display on any
election sign or other election advertising, logo, trademark or official mark, in
whole or in part, owned or licensed by the City.
25
Part 14 Penalty and Enactment
14.1 Every person who violates a provision of this bylaw, or who consents, allows or permits an act
or thing to be done in violation of a provision of this bylaw, or who neglects to or refrains from
doing anything required to be done by a provision of this bylaw, is guilty of an offence and is
liable to the penalties imposed under this bylaw, and is guilty of a separate offence each day
that a violation continues to exist.
14.2 Every person who commits an offence is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding
the maximum allowed by the Offence Act.
READ A FIRST TIME on [Date]
READ A SECOND TIME on [Date]
READ A THIRD TIME on [Date]
ADOPTED by the Council on [Date]
Schedules:
Schedule “A” Sign Permit Fees
Schedule “B” Cross Reference Table
Schedule “C” Temporary Sign Request
Schedule “D” Sign Impoundment Recovery Costs
Signs Permitted in;
Schedule “E” Signs Permitted in all Zones
Schedule “F” Signs Permitted in Agricultural and Residential Zones
Schedule “G” All Commercial Zone
Schedule “H” All Industrial Zones
Schedule “I” All Institutional Zones
PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER
26
Schedule “A” – Sign Permit Fees
a) Each applicant for a sign permit shall submit a non-refundable processing fee of
$62.00. If the sign is approved, this fee will be credited towards the appropriate permit
fee as set out below.
b) The following permit fee, will be assessed for all new signs based on total sign area. For
multi-faced signs, the total sign area shall be the aggregate sign area on all faces.
Up to 3 sq. m [32 sq. ft.]..................................................................................$136.00
Larger than 3 sq. m [32 sq. ft.] up to 6 sq. m [64 sq. ft.]..............................$201.00
Larger than 6 sq. m [64 sq. ft.] up to 10 sq. m [110 sq. ft.].........................$268.00
Larger than 10 sq. m [110 sq. ft.] up to 15 sq. m [160 sq. ft.].....................$337.00
Larger than 15 sq. m [160 sq. ft.] up to 18.6 sq. m [200 sq. ft.].................$403.00
Over 18.6 sq. m [200 sq. ft.]...........................................................................$536.00
c) If an applicant proposes to relocate or alter an existing sign (excluding a temporary on-
site real estate development/construction sign or temporary off-site real estate
development/construction sign) on the same lot without enlarging it, a relocation or
alteration fee of $126.00 plus applicable taxes will be charged under a sign permit.
d) Enlargement, rebuilding, relocation and extension of an existing sign (in height, sign
area or both) amounts to an erection of a new sign and requires a sign permit.
e) Temporary on-site real estate development/construction signs and temporary off-site
real estate development/construction signs shall be assessed the permit fee as
stipulated in this bylaw and a removal deposit of $500.00 shall be paid by the
applicant. This deposit is refundable if the applicant removes the sign within the
stipulated period. If the applicant fails to remove the sign to the satisfaction of the City,
the removal deposit shall be forfeited and the City of Maple Ridge may use the money
to offset the cost incurred by the City to remove the sign.
f) Temporary signs, are subject to a security deposit of $100. This deposit is refundable
providing that all signs are removed within the agreed time frame.
27
Schedule “B” – Cross Reference Table
The following cross reference indicates the type of sign that shall be permitted in a specific zone.
This diagram is included FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY and is not part of the sign bylaw.
SIGN TYPES ZONE AWNING CANOPY CHANGEABLE Copy DEVELOPMENT FACIA FREESTANDING HOME OCCUPATION PROJECTING ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD All
Agricultural
“A” zones
√ X √ X X √ X X X
All Single
Family
residential
“R” & “C-D”
zones
X X X √ X X √ X X
All Multi-
Family
residential
“RM & RT”
zones
X X X √ X X X X X
All
Commercial
“C” zones
√ √ √ √ √ √ X √ √
All
Industrial
“M” zones
√ √ √ √ √ √ X √ X
All
Institutional
“P” zones
√ √ √ √ √ √ X √ √
√ - PERMITTED in the zone
× - NOT PERMITTED in the zone
×× – PROHIBITED IN THE MUNICIPALITY
×× Signs prohibited in the Municipality include:
Animated;
Billboards;
Roof (unless approved by a DVP);
Banner (Unless per Part 7)
Flashing/Oscillating;
Audible/Odor;
Paper/Cardboard;
Balcony
28
29
Schedule “C” – Temporary Sign Permit Application
Pursuant to Sections 12.2 & 13.7 of Sign Bylaw No. 7389 - 2017
Date:
Name of applicant: Applicant’s phone number:
Applicant’s e-mail address:
Name of group or organization (if applicable):
Address of group or organization:
Phone number of group or organization:
Event start date: Event end date:
Date signs will be erected:
Number of signs: Size of signs:
Sign copy:
Location of signs (please be specific):
30
Schedule “C” – Temporary Sign Permit Application
Pursuant to Section 12.2 & 13.7 of Sign Bylaw No. 7389 - 2017
This permit shall be valid and subsisting from the day of _
and shall expire on the day of __ _____ at ___ pm AND at all times
during the currency thereof, shall be subject to cancellation if the holder thereof shall neglect, fail or
refuse to observe and to comply with all the requirements of Maple Ridge Sign Bylaw No. 7389 -
2017, and is issued subject to the following conditions:
1) That all necessary plans and specifications of any works involved have been deposited with the
Bylaw & Licenses Services Department and have been approved;
2) That the applicant shall hold and save harmless the City of Maple Ridge from and against all
claims, damages and lien claims of every kind, arising out of or in any way connected with any
works or other things for which this Permit is issued;
3) That the applicant shall replace and repair all municipal infrastructure effected by the work and
such infrastructure is to be returned to an equal or better condition than that which existed prior
to the work, all within 24 hours of the completed work, to the satisfaction of the City of Maple
Ridge;
4) That the applicant will deposit with the City a sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) in cash or
cheque, to guarantee the fulfillment of the terms and conditions set out herein within the time
specified in this permit.
(Name of applicant) (Signature of applicant)
Office use only
Application: Approved or Declined
Authorization:
Municipal Engineer
Security Deposit $ (Refundable) Receipt No.:
31
Schedule “D” – Sign Impoundment Recovery Costs
Recovery costs for impounded signs are as follows:
Sign removal requiring equipment $150.00
Sign removal not requiring equipment $50.00
32
Schedule “E” – Signs Permitted in All Zones
The following signs shall be permitted in all zones subject to the limitations set forth below:
E-1 Traffic control signs as defined in the “Motor Vehicle Act”, subject to the provisions of said act.
E-2 Signs required to; maintain or post a bylaw or government order, rule or regulation.
E-3 Memorial plaques, cornerstones, historical tablets and the like.
E-4 Directional sign, not exceeding 0.2 sq. m. (2.2 sq. ft.) in area, intended to facilitate the
movement of pedestrians and vehicles within the site upon which such signs are located to
identifying the location and nature of a building, structure or use which is not readily visible
from the street, serving such building, structure or use.
E-5 Prohibitive Signs not exceeding 0.2 sq. m. (2.2 sq. ft.) in area located on private property.
E-6 Temporary Signs pertaining to campaigns, drives or events of political, civic, philanthropic,
educational or religious organizations, require Council approval to erect such signs upon or
over public property and such signs shall be removed within four (4) days after the event.
E-7 Flags or emblems of political, civic, philanthropic, educational or religious organizations.
E-8 Real estate signs provided that in all agricultural (A) zones and residential (R) zones the
combined sign area of such signs fronting upon each street which bounds such lot or premises
shall not exceed a ratio of 1.2 sq. m. (12.9 sq. ft.) of sign area per face (maximum 2 faces) for
each 1000 sq. m. (10,764.5 sq. ft.) of lot area but need not be less than 1.2 sq. m. (12.9 sq.
ft.) and may not exceed 3 sq. m. (32.3 sq. ft.) per face. Such signs shall be placed entirely on
the lot or lots to which the sign in question refers and further, not more than one sign shall be
permitted on each frontage. The signs shall have a maximum height of 1.8 metres (5.9 feet)
and shall not be illuminated.
In all other zones, real estate signs are limited as in Residential and Agricultural zones, except
that each sign face may have an area of no more than 3 sq. m. (32.3 sq. ft.) and have a
maximum height of 2.1 metres (6.9 feet).
One real estate sign advertising a group of lots for sale within a subdivision or a group of
houses for sale within a housing project is permitted for each street frontage, provided that the
total sign area of each sign shall not exceed 3.0 sq. m. (32.3 sq. ft.). The display of such signs
shall be limited to a six (6) month period, beyond which special approval by the chief building
official shall be required
E-9 Signs indicating the name and nature of an agricultural or farm use, where a current trade
licence is held. Such signs shall be permitted only upon the lot to which the sign refers, and
further provided that:
AGRICULTURAL USE
E-9.1 No local farm produce or service sign shall be larger than 3 sq. m. (32.3 sq. ft.) and
further providing that the size of such sign may be increased by 0.1 sq. m. (1.0 sq. ft.)
for each 0.2 hectares over 4 hectares;
E-9.2 This may be a changeable copy sign to permit the sign copy to be changed to specify
33
certain products or services as they are in season.
E-9.3 Such signs shall be removed when produce or service is not for sale.
E-9.4 See Schedule 2 of this by-law for freestanding signs for nurseries & greenhouses in
an agricultural zone.
FARM USE
E-9.5 Farm identification signs may be installed on any registered farm site over 2 hectares
in addition to those permitted by Clause E-9.1 to E9.4.
E-9.6 Farm identification signs shall be limited to the farm name, address, owners name
and farm type only.
E-9.7 Farm identification signs shall not exceed 3.0 sq. m. (32.3 sq. ft.) except that for
every 2 hectares over 4 hectares, the sign area may be increased by 1.0 sq. m. (10.8
sq. ft.).
E-9.8 Building identification signs not exceeding 3.0 sq. m. (32.3 sq. ft.) in area and placed
on the Agricultural building façade facing onsite roads will be permitted to a
maximum of 3 square metres (32.3 square feet) if multiple signs are used provided
these signs are not visible from a highway.
E-10 Special identification signs such as unique items, antique equipment, major archways and
gates ect., require approval from Council.
E-11 A home occupation which is permitted by Maple Ridge Zoning By-Law No. 3510-1985 as
amended, is permitted one sign of not more than 0.18 sq. m. (2.0 sq. ft.) in area, identifying
the name and occupation of the occupant.
E-12 Special event signs advertising for community causes and charitable fund raising campaigns.
Such signs shall be permitted, only with the approval of the Municipal Engineer, on the public
right-of-way and shall be of such size and design and posted at such locations for such periods
as determined by the Municipal Engineer.
E-13 Construction Sign indicating the name and nature of a construction or demolition project, plus
the names of the contractors, sub-contractors and professional advisors, provided that the
combined area of such signs fronting upon each street which bounds such project shall not
exceed a ratio of 0.2 sq. m. (2.2 sq. ft.) of sign area for each 100 sq. m. of lot area. In no case
shall the combined area of such signs fronting upon each street exceed 3.5 sq. m (37.7 sq. ft).
Such sign shall have a maximum height of 3.5 metres (11.5 feet). The display of such signs
shall be limited to a period not to exceed the duration of the said construction or demolition
project, at which time such signs shall be removed.
With the exception of special event signs and freestanding signs for nurseries and greenhouse’s in
agricultural zones, none of the above signs require a sign permit.
34
Schedule “F” – Signs Permitted in Agricultural and Residential Zones
The following signs are permitted only on land Zoned “A”, “R”, “RS”, “CD”, “RM”, “RT”, “SRS”, “RG”,
“RE” and “RMH”:
PERMITTED SIGNS
F-1. Signs permitted in Clauses E-1 to E-13 inclusive of Schedule E of this by-law, as regulated
therein.
F-2. One Facia Sign or Freestanding Sign for an apartment building in RM Zones.
F-3. Freestanding signs for nurseries & greenhouses and changeable copy sign are permitted in
agricultural zones.
F-4. One double faced freestanding sign or 2 single faced freestanding signs are permitted per lot
or premises
REQUIREMENTS
F-5. The sign area for a Facia Sign or Freestanding Sign for an apartment in the RM Zones is not to
exceed 0.8 sq. m. (8.6 sq. ft.) in area.
F-6. The copy area for facia signs shall not exceed 60 percent of the sign area.
F-7. The area of Freestanding signs for nurseries & greenhouses in agricultural zones are not to
exceed a sign area of 6 sq. m. (64 sq. ft.). If the sign is one sided, two separate one sided
signs of equal size are permitted with a total sign area of 6 sq. m. (64 sq. ft.). One sided signs
must be placed at 30 degrees or 60 degrees to the fronting street. A maximum of 30% of
each sign may be a changeable copy sign. A landscaped area of not less than 4 times the sign
area must be provided around each sign base. Freestanding Signs in agricultural zones may
only be indirectly lighted
F-8. The maximum height of a freestanding sign shall be 2 metres (6.6 feet).
F-9. No illuminated signs shall be permitted in residential zones.
35
SCHEDULE “G”- ALL COMMERCIAL ZONES
The following signs are permitted only on land in “C” “CS” & “H” Zones.
PERMITTED SIGNS
G-1. Signs permitted in Schedule E of the by-law as regulated therein.
G-2. Two signs are permitted per business premises which may be canopy, facia or projecting signs
fronting each street bounding the lot on which the sign is located.
G-3. One (1) freestanding sign shall be permitted for each street frontage bounding the site,
provided that each sign is positioned to face the street on which it is located by placing the
copy area at right angles (90 degrees) to the fronting street. For each additional 30 metres
(98.4 feet) of frontage beyond the first 30 metres (98.4 feet) of frontage, an additional
freestanding sign may be permitted. The additional freestanding sign is to be placed so that no
portion of a freestanding sign is closer than 20 metres to any other freestanding sign.
REQUIREMENTS
G-4. The sign area of facia signs shall not exceed 12 percent of the façade area and may only face
a highway or parking lot of the business premises to which it pertains.
G-5. The copy area for facia signs shall not exceed 60 percent of the sign area.
G-6. For channel letter facia signs the sign area shall not exceed 12 percent of the façade area.
The copy area for channel letters facia signs is to equal the sign area.
G-7. The requirements for projecting signs shall be as set forth in Section 13.6 of this by-law.
G-8. Changeable copy signs permitted on the main freestanding sign shall be permitted to a
maximum sign area of 3 sq. m. (32.3 sq. ft.) per sign face in addition to the main freestanding
signs area.
G-9. Any area exceeding the above mentioned three (3) square metres (32.3 square feet) shall be
included in the total calculation for sign area of the freestanding sign,
G-10. The maximum height of a freestanding sign in all “C” & “H” zones shall not exceed 6 metres
(19.7 feet).
G-11. The maximum height of a freestanding sign in all “CS” zones except gasoline service stations
shall not exceed 7.5 metres (24.6 feet), provided that the maximum height may be increased
by 100 mm (4 inches) per lineal metre of frontage over 12 metres (39 feet) up to a maximum
height of 10.5 metres (34.5 feet). No freestanding sign shall be permitted on any lot having a
frontage less than 12 metres (39.3 feet).
G-12. The sign area of a freestanding sign shall not exceeding 0.6 sq. m. (6.5 sq. ft.) per lineal metre
of frontage on which the sign abuts provided that the maximum sign area of a freestanding
sign for other than gasoline service station use shall be as follows:
LOT AREA MAXIMUM SIGN AREA
550 sq. m. (5920.3 sq. ft.) 10 sq. m. (107.6 sq. ft.)
36
550 sq. m to 4,000 sq. m. (5920.3 sq ft to 43,057 sq. ft) 15 sq. m. (161.5 sq. ft.)
Larger than 4000 sq. m. (43,057 sq. ft.) 20 sq. m. (215.3 sq. ft.)
G-13. The copy area for a freestanding sign shall not exceed 60 percent of the sign area. For multi-
tenant paneled sign faces the copy area per panel shall not exceed 60 percent of the panel
area.
GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS AND GASOLINE SERVICE BARS
G-14. For gasoline service stations and gasoline service bars, both as defined in the Maple Ridge
Zoning By-Law No. 3510-1985 as amended, the freestanding sign shall not exceed a
maximum height of 6 metres (19.7 feet) and a sign area not exceeding 7.2 sq. m. (77.5 sq.
ft.).
G-15. Where a structure is installed to provide lighting for open pump islands, one (1) additional sign
per pump island may be incorporated into such lighting device provide that such sign shall not:
a. contain any message other than business logo;
b. exceed a height of 2.4 metres (7.9 feet) above the pump island, and
c. extend beyond the pump unit at either end;
37
Schedule “H” – ALL INDUSTRIAL ZONES
The following signs are permitted only on land in “M” Zones.
PERMITTED SIGNS
H-1. Signs permitted in Schedule E of the by-law as regulated therein.
H-2. Two signs are permitted per business premises which may be canopy or facia signs fronting
each street bounding the property on which the sign is located.
H-3. One (1) freestanding sign shall be permitted for each street frontage bounding the site,
provided that each sign is positioned to face the street on which it is located by placing the
copy area at right angles (90 degrees) to the fronting street. For each additional 30 metres
(98.4 feet) of frontage beyond the first 30 metres (98.4 feet) of frontage, an additional
freestanding sign may be permitted. The additional freestanding sign is to be placed so that
no portion of a freestanding sign is closer than 20 metres to any other freestanding sign..
REQUIREMENTS
H-4. The sign area of facia signs shall not exceed 12 percent of the façade area and may only face
a highway or parking lot of the business premises to which it pertains.
H-5. The copy area for facia signs shall not exceed 60 percent of the sign area.
H-6. For channel letter facia signs the sign area shall not exceed 12 percent of the façade area.
The copy area for channel letters facia signs is to equal the sign area.
H-7. Changeable copy signs permitted on the main freestanding sign shall be permitted to a
maximum sign area of 3.0 sq. m. (32.3 sq. ft.) per sign face in addition to the main
freestanding sign area.
H-8. Any area exceeding the above mentioned three (3) square metres (32.3 square feet) shall be
included in the total calculation for sign area of the freestanding sign,
H-9. The maximum height of a freestanding sign in all “M” zones shall not exceed 7.5 metres (24.6
feet), provided that the maximum height may be increased by 100 mm (4 inches) per lineal
metre of frontage over 12 metres (39 feet) up to a maximum height of 10.5 metres (34.5
feet). No freestanding sign shall be permitted on any lot having a frontage less than 12
metres (39.3 feet).
H-10. The sign area of a freestanding sign shall not exceeding 0.6 sq. m. (6.5 sq. ft.) per lineal metre
of frontage on which the sign abuts provided that the maximum sign area of a freestanding
sign shall be as follows:
LOT AREA MAXIMUM SIGN AREA
550 sq. m. (5920.3 sq. ft.) 10 sq. m. (107.6 sq. ft.)
550 sq. m to 4,000 sq. m. (5920.3 sq ft to 43,057 sq. ft) 15 sq. m. (161.5 sq. ft.)
Larger than 4000 sq. m. (43,057 sq. ft.) 20 sq. m. (215.3 sq. ft.)
H-11. The copy area for a freestanding sign shall not exceed 60 percent of the sign area. For multi-
tenant paneled sign faces the copy area per panel shall not exceed 60 percent of the panel
area.
38
SCHEDULE “I”- ALL INSTITUTIONAL ZONES
The following signs are permitted only on land in “P” Zones.
I-1. Signs permitted in Schedule E of the by-law as regulated therein.
I-2. One facia sign per business premises or one (1) freestanding sign shall be permitted for each
street frontage bounding the site, provided that each sign is positioned to face the street on
which it is located by placing the copy area at right angles (90 degrees) to the fronting street.
For each additional 30 metres (98.4 feet) of frontage beyond the first 30 metres (98.4 feet) of
frontage, an additional freestanding sign may be permitted. The additional freestanding sign is
to be placed so that no portion of a freestanding sign is closer than 20 metres to any other
freestanding sign.
REQUIREMENTS
I-3. The total area of a facia sign shall not exceed a ratio of 0.3 sq. m. (3.2 sq. ft.) for each lineal
metre of the business premises to which the sign is attached.
I-4. The copy area for facia signs shall not exceed 60 percent of the sign area.
I-5. For channel letter facia signs the sign area shall not exceed 12 percent of the façade area.
The copy area equals the sign area.
I-6. The maximum sign area of a freestanding sign shall not exceed 6 sq. m. (64.6 sq. ft.).
I-7. The copy area for a freestanding sign shall not exceed 60 percent of the sign area. For multi-
tenant paneled sign faces the copy area per panel shall not exceed 60 percent of the panel
area.
I-8. The maximum height of a freestanding sign shall be 6 metres (19.7 feet).
I-9. Changeable copy signs permitted on the main freestanding sign shall be permitted to a
maximum sign area of 3 sq. m. (32.3 sq. ft.) per sign face in addition to the main freestanding
signs area.
I-10. Any area exceeding the above mentioned three (3) square metres (32.3 square feet) shall be
included in the total calculation for sign area of the freestanding sign,
Page 1 of 3
City of Maple Ridge
TO: Her Worship Mayor Nicole Read MEETING DATE: 24-October-2017
and Members of Council FILE NO:
FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Council
SUBJECT: Financial Plan & Council Work Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
For the past number of years, the City’s Business Planning process has culminated with
departmental presentations to Council followed by consideration of the 5-year Financial Plan Bylaw.
In recognition of the fact that 2018 is the last year of Council’s current mandate and has heard from
all the departments a number of times, staff is suggesting a slight modification to the process for
this year.
Council adopted the 2018-2022 Business & Financial Planning guidelines, attached as Appendix
“1”, in July that included funding for a number of Parks & Recreation projects. Staff is asking that
Council direct staff to bring forward a Financial Plan for consideration, reflecting those guidelines
and subsequent discussions.
Staff is further suggesting that departmental presentations to Council be scheduled as part of
Council Workshop meetings. These have been incorporated into the proposed Council Work
Schedule Matrix attached as Appendix “2” to this report.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
That staff be directed to bring forward the 2018-2022 Financial Plan for consideration; and further
That the Council Work Schedule Matrix to March 2018 be endorsed.
DISCUSSION:
a)Background Context:
For the past number of years, the City’s Business Planning process has culminated with
departmental presentations to Council over a number of days followed by consideration of the
Financial Plan for the upcoming 5-year planning horizon. In recognition of the fact that 2018 is
the last year of Council’s current mandate staff is suggesting a slightly different process be
considered for the 2018-2022 Financial Plan.
1131
Page 2 of 3
The Business & Financial Planning Guidelines are the cornerstone of the Business Planning
process. It is these guidelines that set the direction for property tax, recycling, sewer and water
rates for the upcoming 5-year planning cycle. In May, the Audit & Finance Committee endorsed
guidelines for 2018-2022. Following that meeting, Council approved a number of Parks &
Recreation projects and the guidelines were amended in July to include an additional 0.35% tax
increase for seven years, starting in 2018, as set out in the funding model for those projects.
The amended guidelines are attached as Appendix “1”.
At this time staff is seeking direction to bring forward a financial plan reflecting the discussions
noted above.
Since the business planning guidelines were endorsed, Council has had several conversations
around the construction of an outdoor pool, most recently directing staff to proceed following the
typical schedule process. In the coming weeks, staff will be bringing forward a report outlining
that process and more complete costs. The Financial Plan can be amended once those details
are known.
The business planning format used in previous years has allowed Council 3 or 4 days to hear
from all City departments about the work they do and any highlights planned for the upcoming
year. Given where we are in the current mandate, Council has already heard from the
departments at various times and there may be more value in having each department come to
Council Workshop to talk about their work over the coming months. Staff has incorporated this
into the work schedule matrix in addition to other key items Council is working on. The proposed
Council Work Schedule Matrix, outlining work to the end of March is attached as Appendix “2”.
The schedule will be refreshed early in the New Year to include the balance of 2018.
b) Desired Outcome(s):
To have the 2018-2022 Financial Plan Bylaw adopted before the end of 2017, and to have
scheduled opportunities for Council to hear from all City departments in the coming months.
c) Alternatives:
Council could opt to follow the same process as prior years and receive departmental business
plans over a period of 3 or 4 days in late November prior to considering the 2018-2022 Financial
Plan Bylaw. Staff is recommending a new format, in recognition of the fact that 2018 is the last
year of Council’s current mandate.
Page 3 of 3
CONCLUSIONS:
The Business Planning process used in the City has served us well over the years and one of the
keys to that has been its adaptability to change. Staff is recommending that for 2018 we separate
the departmental presentations to Council from the Financial Plan presentation. Doing so would
allow Council to consider the Financial Plan at upcoming meetings and to hear from the departments
over the coming months as part of the regularly scheduled Council Workshop agendas.
“Original signed by Catherine Nolan”
Prepared by: Catherine Nolan, CPA, CGA
Interim Director of Finance
“Original signed by Kelly Swift”
Approved by: Kelly Swift
GM, Parks, Recreation & Culture
“Original signed by Frank Quinn”
Approved by: Frank Quinn
GM, Public Works & Development
“Original signed by Paul Gill”
Concurrence: Paul Gill, CPA, CGA
Chief Administrative Officer
Appendix “1”
*The proposed property tax increase for Parks & Recreation includes a 0.35% increase for the following,
as approved at the July 25, 2017 Council meeting:
Leisure Centre Renovations
Telosky Field
Albion Community Centre
Silver Valley Gathering Place
Hammond Community Centre
Ridge Canoe & Kayak Club
MRSS Track Facility Upgrade
Additional Ice Sheet
Work in still in progress regarding the outdoor pool and the Financial Plan can be amended once the
details are known.
Municipal Property Tax & User Fee Increases
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Property Tax Increases :
General Purpose 3.00%2.25%1.90%1.92%2.10%1.90%1.90%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%
Infrastructure Replacement 1.00%0.50%0.50%0.50%0.50%0.70%0.70%0.70%0.70%0.70%0.70%
Fire Service Improvement 0.89%0.33%- - - - - - - - -
Parks & Recreation - 0.13%0.25%0.25%0.25%0.25%0.60%0.60%0.60%0.60%0.60%
Drainage - 0.30%0.30%0.30%0.30%0.30%0.30%0.30%0.30%0.30%0.30%
Total Property Tax Increase 4.89%3.51%2.95%2.97%3.15%3.15%3.50%3.60%3.60%3.60%3.60%
User Fee Increases:
Recycling 6.00%3.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.67%1.67%2.76%2.75%2.75%2.74%
Water 9.00%5.50%5.50%5.50%4.50%4.50%4.50%4.50%4.50%4.50%4.50%
Sewer 4.39%4.05%4.07%4.10%3.22%3.24%3.25%3.25%3.27%3.28%3.29%
Total Property Tax and User Fee Increases **5.57%3.91%3.46%3.49%3.33%3.39%3.62%3.72%3.72%3.72%3.72%
Actual Proposed
Council Work Schedule Matrix 2017 - 2018 Appendix 2
ITEM DIVISION Lead DATE OF MEETING MEETING STATUS AND COMMENTS
1 Secondary Suites Discussion Paper PWDS Plan Complete
2 Heritage Inventory Presentation PWDS Plan Sept Council Complete
3 Suburban Residential and Estate Residential
Lot Size
PWDS Plan 5-Sep-17 W/S Complete
4 DGS Update PWDS Plan 5-Sep-17 W/S Complete
5 Borrowing Bylaws & Alternative Approval
Process
CFS Clerks/
Finance
12-Sep-17 W/S/
Council
Complete
With Province & will come back to Council for
Final Reading.
6 Fire Hall No. 4 - Award of Architectural RFP CFS Fire 12-Sep-17 Council Complete
7 Community Grant Recommendations CFS Clerks/
Finance
Sept 12 or 19 Complete
8 Solid Waste RFP PWDS Eng 19-Sep-17 W/S Complete
Presented to Council. RFP to be issued in
2018 Plebiscite as part of the election.
9 EOC/ESS Presentation CFS Clerks 3-Oct-17 W/S Complete
10 DGS Scoping Report PWDS Plan 3-Oct-17 Complete
11 Audit RFP Result & Contract Award
Recommendation
CFS Clerks/
Finance
10-Oct-17 Complete
12 Permissive Tax Exemptions CFS Clerks/
Finance
10-Oct-17 Council Complete
Audit Committee mtg first - Oct 3
13 Increase number of Council Members CFS Clerks 10-Oct-17 Council Complete
14 Senior Government Grants ADMIN SCP 17-Oct-17 W/S Complete
Verbal presentation by Dan Olivieri
15 Open Government Portal CFS IT 17-Oct-17 Complete
Launched October 17, 2017
16 Ridge Meadows Minor Lacrosse Follow-up
Report
PRC Parks 24-Oct-17 Council Request from 24-July Council W/S
17 Sign Bylaw PWDS Bylaws 24-Oct-17 Council Prepared bylaw for 1st Reading and
consultation.
18 DCC Bylaw CFS Finance Late Oct/Nov Council Will proceed to Council pending input received
from UDI & Provincial Approval
19 Business Plan Update
- Police
- Fire
ADMIN/
CFS
Various 7-Nov-17 W/S
20 EMS Implementation Strategy PWDS Plan 7-Nov-17 W/S
21 Hammond Area Character Study PWDS Plan 7-Nov-17 W/S Staff to present Consulting Report.
22 Outdoor Pool Process Report PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
7-Nov-17 Council
23 Soil Deposit Bylaw Update PWDS Plan 7-Nov-17 W/S
24 Tree Bylaw Update PWDS Plan 7-Nov-17 W/S
25 Indoor Pool Consultation Process PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
14-Nov-17 Council Report on the engagement process for the
design of a future indoor pool.
Report on the options for achieving an indoor
running track (suitable for seniors)
26 Age Friendly Initiative (AFI) Action Plan -
Implementation Schedule
PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
21-Nov-17 W/S MACAI is making a recommentation to Council
for AFI to become a sub-committee of MACAI.
Report to Council in Nov.
27 Business Plan Update
- Capital Works Program
- Engineering
- Active Transportation Advisory Committee
PWDS Various 21-Nov-17 W/S
28 Citywide CAC/Density Bonus Scoping Report PWDS Plan 21-Nov-17 W/S
29 Cycling Facilities Review PWDS Eng 21-Nov-17 W/S Will include Bikes on Sidewalks and speed on
224 Street and general cycling issues.
30 Karina LeBlanc Field Update PRC Parks 21-Nov-17 Council
31 Parking Issues PWDS Plan 21-Nov-17 W/S Scoping Report
Council Work Schedule Matrix 2017 - 2018 Appendix 2
ITEM DIVISION Lead DATE OF MEETING MEETING STATUS AND COMMENTS
32 Parks Commission PRC Admin 21-Nov-17 W/S
33 Rental Above Commercial PWDS Plan 21-Nov-17 W/S
34 Youth Strategy Implementation Schedule PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
21-Nov-17 W/S
35 Youth Wellness Centre Concept & Funding
Estimate
PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
21-Nov-17 W/S Report on Capital Needs.
36 Business Plan Update CFS Finance 28-Nov-17 Council Financial Plan Overview
37 Supportive Recovery Update PWDS Plan 28-Nov-17 TBD
38 Process Update on PRC Infrastructure Projects
- Whonnock Lake Community Centre
- MRSS Track Facility
- Silver Valley Gathering Places
- Hammond Community Centre
PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
Q1 - 2018 W/S Pending outcome of Alternative approval
process
39 Sports Team Sponsorship Policy PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
Q1 - 2018 W/S Council directed staff to bring back a report
on a sports team sponsorship policy.
40 Agreement Renewals: Arts Council PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
Jan 2018 Council
41 Agreement Renewals: Haney Farmers Market PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
Jan 2018 Council
42 Agriculture DP PWDS Plan Jan 2018 W/S
43 Albion Community Centre Design PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
Jan 2018 W/S
44 Albion Flats & Next Steps PWDS Plan Jan 2018 Closed Present to Council after meeting with ALC.
Arts & Cultural Plan Draft/Final Report PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
Jan 2018 W/S
Council
Draft in progress & will be reviewed by
Cultural Plan Task Force. Final report to
Council December/January.
46 Business Plan Update
- Information Technology
- Communications
- Economic Development
- Economic Advisory Committee
ADMIN/
CFS
Various Jan 2018 W/S
47 Business Plan Update
- PRC Administration
- Social Policy Advisory Committee
- Municipal Advisory Committee on
Accessibility Issues
- Public Art Steering Committee
- Parks, Facilities & Open Space
- Recreation & Community Services
PRC Various Jan 2018 W/S
48 Development Report Template review PWDS Plan Jan 2018 W/S
49 Driveway Policy PWDS Eng Jan 2018 W/S
50 Festival Support Grant Recommendations PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
Jan 2018 Council
51 MRLC Award of Tender for Construction PRC Facilities Jan 2018 Tender Closes 22-Oct
52 Purchasing Policy PWDS Operations Jan 2018 W/S
53 Regional Transportation Issues
- Area Transit Plan
- Mobility Pricing
- B-Line
PWDS Eng Jan 2018 W/S
54 Rental Relocation Policy PWDS Plan Jan 2018 W/S
55 Report on Albion Dyking District and District 13 PWDS Eng/Ops Jan 2018 W/S
56 Zoning Bylaw - Agricultural Setbacks PWDS Plan Jan 2018 W/S
57 Zoning Bylaw - draft Bylaw PWDS Plan Jan 2018 W/S
58 Abernathy Connector PWDS Eng Feb 2018 W/S
Council Work Schedule Matrix 2017 - 2018 Appendix 2
ITEM DIVISION Lead DATE OF MEETING MEETING STATUS AND COMMENTS
59 Business Plan Update
- Building
- Licences & Bylaws
- Recycling
- Operations
PWDS Various Feb 2018 W/S
60 Business Plan Update
- Planning
- Agricultural Advisory Committee
- Community Heritage Commission
- Environmental Advisory Committee
PWDS Various Feb 2018 W/S
61 Encroachment Agreement Policy PWDS Eng Feb 2018 W/S W/S first, then Council
62 Fraser Basin Council PWDS Eng Feb 2018 W/S
63 Multi-Material British Columbia (MMBC)PWDS Eng Feb 2018 W/S
64 Business Plan Update
- Human Resources
- Clerks
- Finance
- Sustainability & Corporate Planning
ADMIN Various March 2018 W/S
65 Incentives for Rental PWDS Plan March 2018 W/S
66 Integrated Stormwater Management Plans PWDS Eng March 2018 W/S To review KWL findings of ISMPs
67 OCP Strategy/Study updates PWDS Plan March 2018 W/S
68 Sport & Physical Activity Strategy - Steering
Committee Update
PRC Recreation &
Comm. Svcs
March 2018 W/S
Council
69 2017-2021 Financial Plan Bylaw Amendment CFS Finance TBD Council
70 Downtown Parking Policy Discussion CFS Clerks/
Planning/
ED/Bylaws
TBD Council Paul Gill has email from Laurie Darcus - need
a working group
71 Silver Valley Land Use PWDS Plan TBD W/S Following gathering spaces decision &
property strategy
Legend
Admin
PRC
CFS
PWDS
Administration (includes Sustainability & Corporate Planning)
Parks, Recreation & Culture
Corporate & Financial Services
Public Works & Development Services
Abbreviation