Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-04-17 Public Hearing Meeting Agenda and Reports.pdfDeep Roots Greater Heights District of Maple Ridge PUBLIC HEARING April 17, 2012 DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TAKE NOTICE THAT a Public Hearing will be held in the Council Chamber of the Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, North-East corner entrance, at 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, April 17, 2012 to consider the following bylaws: 1a) 2011-008-RZ MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING BYLAW NO. 6903-2012 LEGAL: Lots 1 and 2, both of Section 22, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 71164; Lots 1 and 2, both of Section 22, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 70674; Lot 2, Section 22, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan EPP1414; Lot 2, Section 22, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 72685; Lots 1 and 2, both of Section 22, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 72087; Lots 71, 72, 73, 75, 76, 78, 80, all of Section 22, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 43885; Lots 1 and 2, both of Section 22, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 72374; Lots 1 and 2, both of Section 22, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 72831. LOCATION: 19 lots on Ansell Street, North of 124 Avenue PURPOSE: To Amend Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan FROM: Suburban Residential TO: Estate Suburban Residential 1 JN i l� 1b) 2011-008-RZ MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING BYLAW NO. 6794-2011 LEGAL: Lots 72 and 73, both of Section 22, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 43885 LOCATION: 12610 and 12640 Ansell Street FROM: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) TO: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) PURPOSE: To permit future subdivision into 4 lots 2) 2011-068-RZ MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING BYLAW NO. 6842-2011 LEGAL: South half of Lot 13, Section 26, Township 12, New Westminster District, Plan 7639 LOCATION: 25339 130 Avenue FROM: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) TO: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) PURPOSE: To permit future subdivision into 4 single family lots. 2 3a) RZ/109/08 MAPLE RIDGE HERITAGE DESIGNATION AND REVITALIZATION AND TAX EXEMPTION AGREEMENT BYLAW NO. 6902-2012 LEGAL: Lot 141, District Lot 396, Group 1, New Westminster District, Plan 29594 LOCATION: 22031 Dewdney Trunk Road PURPOSE: A bylaw to designate a property as a heritage property under Section 967 of the Local Government Act and to enter into a Heritage Revitalization Agreement under Section 966 of the Local Government Act and to grant a Tax Exemption under Section 225 of the Community Charter. This tax exemption is applicable to "Duplex 1" only (heritage building) at the above mentioned location. 3b) RZ/109/08 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING BYLAW NO. 6907-2012 PURPOSE: To amend Schedule "A" of the Official Community Plan Chapter 8, Development Permit Area guidelines, Section 8.4 Development Permit Area Exemptions is amended by inserting the following after item 10) as item 1(k): Alterations to a heritage building protected through a heritage designation, provided that the building is subject to a Heritage Revitalization Agreement bylaw that has received final reading from Council, or a Heritage Alteration Permit that has received final approval. AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that a copy of the aforesaid bylaws and copies of staff reports and other information considered by Council relevant to the matters contained in the bylaws will also be available for public inspection at the Municipal Hall, Planning Department counter, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. from April 3 to April 17, 2012, Saturdays, Sundays and Statutory Holidays excepted. Some of this information will also be posted on the District website www.maplerid.ge.ca on the Mayor and Council/Agendas and Minutes page. ALL PERSONS who deem themselves affected by any of these bylaws shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to be heard at the Public Hearing before Council on the matters contained in the bylaws or by making a written submission to the attention of the Manager of Legislative Services or by sending an e-mail to the Clerk's Department at clerks@mapleridge.ca , by 4:00 p.m., April 17, 2012. All written submissions and e-mails will become part of the public record. Dated this 3rd day of April, 2012. Ceri Marlo Manager of Legislative Services DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR FILE 2011-008-RZ File Manager: Michelle Bast Official Community Plan or Zoning Bylaw Amendments: RECEIVED NOT REQUIRED 1. A completed Application Form ® (Schedule "A" - Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999) ❑ 2. An application fee, payable to the District of Maple Ridge, in accordance El with Development Application Fee Bylaw no. 5949-2001. 3. A Certificate of Title and Consent Form if the applicant is different from El the owner shown on the Certificate of Title. 4. A legal survey of the property(ies) ® ❑ 5. Subdivision plan layout ® ❑ 6. Neighbourhood context plan 7. Lot grading plan ❑ 8. Landscape plan'+ 9. Preliminary architectural plans including site plan, building elevations, accessory off-street parking and general bylaw compliance reconciliation`+. These items may not be required for single-family residential applications + These items may be required for two-family residential applications, as outlined in Council Policy No. 6.01 Additional rePortsprovided: Geotechnical Review of Site Information- Feb. 29, 2012, Braun Geotechnical Ltd. Agricultural Impact Assessment - April 19, 2011, Upland Consulting Vegetative Buffer Planting Plan - Dec. 2, 2011, Upland Consulting Environmental Impact Assessment - May 2011, Aquaterra Biological Consulting 1. DISTRfCT OF Agenda Item: 1103 MAPLE RIDGE Council [Aleeting of: March 27, 2012 1. That Bylaw No. 6903-2012 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 2. That it be confirmed that Bylaw No. 6903-2012 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 3- That Bylaw No. 6903-2012 be given first and second readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and (2011-008-RZ, various addresses, Ansell Street Area - to designate the subject area from Suburban Residential to Estate Suburban Residential to harmonize the proposed sewage system and service with the land use designation. This is a required step for establishing a Local Area Service agreement for Ansell Street) -AR IED DEFEATED DEFERRED "Ernie Daykin" MAYOR TO: _ Chief Administrative Officer ACTION NOTICE Executive Director Mgr - Strategic Economic Initiatives Mgr - Sustainability & Corp Planning Mgr - Communications _ Gen Mgr - Corporate & Financial RCMP Fire Chief Mgr - Accounting _ Chief Information Officer n Mgr - Public Works & Development Dir - Planning Dir- Licenses, Permits & Bylaws Municipal Engineer Dir - Engineering Operations _ Gen Mgr - Com. Dev. & Rec. Services Dir - Parks & Facilities Dir - Recreation Dir - Community Services Clerk's Section Corporate Officer Property & Risk Manager Lynn Marchand — Diana Dalton Amanda Allen Tracy Camire Amanda Gaunt Karen Kaake � ate► ■ . ;,�� � � � - The above decision was made at a meeting of the Municipal Council held on the date noted above and is sent to you for notation and/or such action as may be required by your Department. March 27 2012 Date ` Ma f1 Z j� Corporate Officer DISTRICT 0, Ite MAPLE RIDGE �'l enda ;: 1104. Council IAleeting of: March 27, 2012 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6794 - 2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading: i. Registration of a geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; ii. A Restrictive Covenant for preservation of the agricultural buffer must be registered at the Land Title Office, including a disclosure statement regarding neighbouring farming practices; Removal of the existing buildings encroaching on proposed properties; iv. Approval of Local Area Service Bylaw for sanitary sewer to Ansell Street Area; V. An Engineer's report on the water quantity for domestic and fire protection purposes must be received; vi. Council approval for variance for pavement width and road width for portions of Ansell Street; vii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. (2011-008-RZ, 12610 and 12640 Ansell Street - to rezone from RS-3 [One Family Rural Residential] to RS-2 [One Family Suburban Residential] to permit future subdivision into four lots) CARED DEFEATED DEFERRED "Ernie Daykin" MAYOR TO: _ Chief Administrative Officer ACTION NOTICE Executive Director —. Gen Mgr - Corporate & Financial RCMP _. Fire Chief Mgr - Accounting Chief Information Officer _ Caen Mgr - Public Works & Development Dir-Planning r Dir - Licenses, Permits & Bylaws Municipal Engineer Dir - Engineering Operations _ Gen Mgr - Com. Dev. & Rec. Services Clerk's Section Corporate Officer Property & Risk Manager Lynn Marchand / Diana Dalton ✓ Amanda Allen Jracy Camire Amanda Gaunt Karen Kaake 2- The above decision was made at a meeting of the Municipal Council held on the date noted above and is sent to you for notation and/or such action as may be required by your Department. March 27 2012 Date Corporate Officer Deep Roots Greater Nnghts District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING DATE: FILE NO: MEETING: March 19, 2012 2011-008-RZ C of W SUBJECT: First and Second Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6903-2012 Various Addresses (Ansel) Street Area) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This report is to amend the Official Community Plan (OCP) to re -designate the Subject Area (see Appendix A) from Suburban Residential to Estate Suburban Residential to harmonize the proposed sewage system and service with the land use designation. This is a required step for establishing a Local Area Service (LAS) agreement for Ansell Street (Academy Park Phase 2). Council authorized staff to proceed with the next steps at a Council Meeting held on May 10, 2011. There are currently two rezoning applications in process that will require this OCP amendment prior to proceeding to Second Reading, therefore this OCP Amending Bylaw (see Appendix B) is being brought forward prior to the LAS Bylaw, in order to prevent delays in processing the rezoning applications. RECOMMENDATIONS: I. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylew No. 6903-2Q12 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 2. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw Nc. 6903- 2012 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and !Waste Management Plan; 3. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6903-2012 be given First and Second Readings and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 4. That the following condition be met prior to Final Reading. L Amendment to Schedule "B" of the Official Community Plan; DISCUSSION: Applicant: District of Maple Ridge Owners: See attached summary of properties (Appendix C) Legal Descriptions: See attached summary of properties (Appendix C) OCP: Existing: Suburban Residential Proposed: Estate Suburban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: This OCP Amending Bylaw is for the properties included in the LAS Bylaw that are currently designated Suburban Residential Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Agricultural East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Agricultural West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) and RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Estate Suburban Residential Existing Use of Properties: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Properties: Single Family Residential Site Areas: Various Access: Ansel! Street, 124 Avenue, 125 Avenue, and 126 Avenue Servicing requirement: Rural Standard b) Site Characteristics: Project Description: In 2010, the District received approval from Metro Vancouver to include 19 properties in the Ansell Street area into the Greater Vancouver Sewer and Drainage District (GVS&DD) Fraser Sewerage Area (FSA). The property owners have filed a petition for a sewer to be installed under a Local Area Service (LAS) process. Council approval was given to establish the LAS, proceed with the next steps for final design and construction, and prepare the LAS bylaw when the project is complete. The OCP land use designation differentiates between "suburban residential" type properties that are within the FSA, or are not. Properties designated Estate Suburban Residential are within the FSA, whereas properties designated Suburban Residential are not. Given the inclusion of these sites into the FSA, an OCP amendment is required. Wz c) Planning Analysis: Official Communit Plan: The purpose of this OCP Amending Bylaw (see Appendix B) is to re -designate the Subject Area (see Appendix A) to Estate Suburban Residential to reflect the recent FSA amendment and allow for municipal sanitary service connections. Zoning Bylaw: Currently, there are two applications involving three properties, seeking rezoning from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit future subdivision. The proposed subdivisions will add approximately three properties to the Subject Area, which will lower the LAS costs to the owners, as the total cost will be divided by more properties. These applications will be the subject of future staff reports. These properties would be able to rezone and subdivide regardless of the redesignation of the Subject Area, however, they would need to prove out septic feasibility if they were to rezone and subdivide under the current Suburban Residential designation. Metro Vancouver 2040 - Regional Growth Strategy: The subject properties are designated Rural in the Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy. Section 1.3.1 of the Plan states that the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District (GVS&DD) is not to extend regional sewer services into Rural areas, except for building footprints in cases where infrastructure is needed to address a public health issue. In this case. in 2010. the GVS&DD Board did amend the FSA boundary to include the Ansell Street area properties into the FSA. The provision of sewer into the area does not necessitate a Regional Plan amendment to change the Rural Land Use designation. d) Citizen/Customer Implications This OCP amendment is intended to harmonize the proposed sewage system and service with the land use designation, to allow for municipal sanitary service connections. Under the LAS Policy, the full capital costs of the Ansell Street sewer system will be recovered from the property owners. Details of the costs associated with the LAS were outlined in the Local Area Service - Ansell Street (Academy Park Phase 2) report, dated May 2, 2011 (see Appendix D). Local Government Act: An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, re -designation from Suburban Residential to Estate Suburban Residential, is considered to be minor in nature. It has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including -3- referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that First and Second Reading be given to Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6903-2012 and be forwarded to Public Hearing. 7. Prepared by: Michelle Bast, AScT Planning Technician Approved by: Christine Carter, MPL, MCIP Doctor of Planning Approved 11 Frank Quinn, MBA, Ping GM: Public Works & I�ee pment Services Concurrence: J. L: (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer r The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - OCP Amending Bylaw 6903-2012 Appendix C - Summary of Properties within the Subject Area Appendix D - Local Area Service - Ansell Street (Academy Park Phase 2) report ME Ci f Pitt • Mea ow_s i • r 124 Ave & Ansell St v r- _ CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF NDistrict of -_ f _ _ MAPLE RIDGE Langley - PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1:3,500 TTiTP �seR r DATE: Mar27, 2012 2011-008-RZ BY: JV APPENDV B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6903-201.2 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "B" forming part of the Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 6425 - 2006 as amended WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "B` to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Counci! of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Communi4r Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6903-2012.0 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 2, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 71164 Lot 1, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 71164 Lot 2, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 70674 Lot 1, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 70674 Lot 2, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan EPP1414 Lot 80, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 43885 Lot 2, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 72685 Lot 2, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 72087 Lot 1, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 72087 Lot 71, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 43885 Lot 72, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 43885 Lot 73, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 43885 Lot 1, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 72374 Lot 2, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 72374 Lot 75, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 43885 Lot 76, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 43885 Lot 1, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 72831 Lot 2, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 72831 Lot 78, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Plan 43885 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 829, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby redesignated to Estate Suburban Residential. t 3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of READ A SECOND TIME the day of PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of READ A THIRD TIME the day of RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the PRESIDING MEMBER , A.D. 20 A.D. 20 . ,A.D. 20 . ,A.D. 20 . day of , A.D. 20 . CORPORATE OFFICER 1 19 12 Rem 2i 11 PART LYING EAST OF 4LOUEITE RIVER P 5052 AND NORTH OF RIG —OF WAY If 'LMP 22994 "Mas GP 7, -S 3755 /fMS 3755 ECIP i1571 12 126 AVE. 738 P 86522 P 86522 g % Z P 83 P 1 z 2 75 125 AVEP 76 P —85 53 E[cf m2x: P SD52 1-05 P —85 71 R. 124 AVE N 190 12 Rem 12 P.. 12 MAPLE RIDGE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDING Bylaw No. 69013- 2012 Map No. 829 From Suburban Residential To- Estate Suburban Residential 2A N I SCALE 1.5.000 Deep Roots District of Maple Ridge Greater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: March 19, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W 08-RZ of W SUBJECT: Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw ^do.679A - 2011 12610 and 12640 Ansell Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject properties, 12610 and 12640 Ansell Street, from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). These properties are currently designated in the Official Community Plan (OCP) as Suburban Residential. There is a current OCP amending bylaw application in process that would re -designate these properties as Estate Suburban Residential. The RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone is compatible with both of the OCP designations; however, if the properties do not get re -designated tc Estate Suburban Residential, the applicant will need to prove out septic feasibility. The application is currently assessed on its feasibility with connection to a municipal sanitary sewer connection through a Local Area Service bylaw. Should the properties not get re -designated to Estate Suburban Residential, additional information will be required and further conditions will need to be met prior to Final Reading. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6794 - 2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing-, and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading: i. Registration of a geotechnicai report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; ii. A Restrictive Covenant for preservation of the agricultural buffer must be registered at the Land Title Office, including a disclosure statement regarding neighbouring farming practices; iii. Removal of the existing buildings encroaching on proposed properties; iv. Approval of Local Area Service Bylaw for sanitary sewer to Ansell Street Area: V. An Engineer's report on the water quantity for domestic and fire protection purposes must be received; vi. Council approval for variance for pavement width and road width for portions of Anseli Street; vii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owners: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Zone: Designation South.: Use: Zone: Designation East: Use: Zone: Designation: West: Use: Zone: Designation: Existing Use of Properties: Proposed Use of Properties: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Project Description: Dennis Dickson Dennis and Darlene Dickson, and James and Frances Shull Lot 72 and Lot 73, Section 22, Township 12, NWD Pian 43885 Suburban Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Single Family Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Suburban Residential Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Suburban Residential Vacant RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Agricultural Single Family Residential RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Suburban Residential Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 0.86 ha (2.1 acres) and 0.81 ha (2.0 acres) Ansell Street Rural Standard An application has been received to rezone the subject properties from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), to further subdivide into four lots. A panhandle is proposed to access the two new lots, as geotechnical constraints hindered the -2- northern property from subdividing and providing an acceptable buildable area on its own due to Steep SIGpeS on the north end Of the Property. Tr' lands to the east and single family residential p opertproperties ptheerte north, aredwest,nand Soluth.cultAl Geotechnical Assessment, Agricultural Impact Assessment, and Environmental Impact Assessment were conducted on the properties. Results of these assessments are summarized in the Environmental Implications section below. c) Planning Analysis: Offici I Community Plan: The proposed rezoning to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) is in accordance with the subject properties' designation as Suburban Residential in the Official Community Plan. There is a current OCP amending bylaw application in process that would re -designate these properties as Estate Suburban Residential. The RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone is compatible with both of the OCP designations; however, if the properties do not get re -designated to Estate Suburban Residential, the applicant will need to prove out septic feasibility. The application is currently assessed on its feasibility with connection to a municipal sanitary sewer connection through a Local Area Service bylaw. Should the properties not get re -designated to Estate Suburban Residential, additional information will be required and further conditions will need to be met prior to Final Reading. Zoning Eylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the properties located at 12640 and 12610 Ansell Street from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit future subdivision into four lots. The RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone requires a minimum lot area of 0.40 ha, a minimum lot width of 36 m and a minimum lot depth of 60 m. The four proposed single family lots comply with the above requirements of the Zoning Bylaw as follows: o area of each lot is proposed to be 0.40 ha; o the lot widths are proposed to be approximately 42 m (Lot 1); 69 m (Lot 2); 44 m (Lot 3); and 38 m (Lot 4) • lot depths are proposed to be approximately 62 m (Lot 1); 62.5 m (Lot 2); 85.5 m (Lot 3); and 103 m (Lot 4). A Development Variance Permit will be required for: • the road carriageway on Ansell Street being 6 m in width as o of 7 m in the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw; opposed to the required width • the rear setback for Lot 3, which is proposed to be 1.5 m, as opposed to the 7.5 required by the zone; and m setback • jogs in the lot lines for Lots 2 and 3, which are not permitted in the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw unless, in the opinion of the Approving Officer, physical constraints make such jogs necessary. I NE These variances and any other variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will be the subject of a future Council report. Devefo ment Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.10 of the Official Community Plan, a Natural Features Development Permit application is required for all development and subdivision activity for all lands with an average natural slope of greater than 15 percent to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of the natural environment and for development that is protected from hazardous conditions. The details of the requirements of the Natural Features Development Permit are discussed in the Environmental Implications section below. A security fee will be taken as a condition of the issuance of the Natural Features Development Permit to ensure that the Development Permit guidelines are met. d) Environmentallmplications: A Geotechnical Hazard Assessment was conducted by Braun Geotechical Ltd. on the subject properties to assess terrain hazard conditions in the area with potential to impact the proposed subdivision of the subject properties. An intrusive site exploration was conducted to confirm site soil conditions noted during the hazard assessment and to provide geotechnical comments and recommendations for the proposed subdivision. The southern property, 12610 Ansell Street, is low relief and fiat -lying. The northern property, 12640 Ansel! Street, is reasonably flat -lying adjacent to the east of Ansel! Street, with the northern and north-eastern portions of the property located on the steep ravine slopes. Ravines and stream channels drain northward through a lower bench area at the base of the north -facing slopes and eventually into the Alouette River. Flood elevations for the Alouette River are well -below the toe of slopes located to the north of the property. The Geotechnical Hazard Assessment was limited to potential constraints to development near the crest of slopes located at the northern portion of 12640 Ansell Street, and provision of preliminary geotechnical slope setback criteria required for establishing suitable building envelope areas, or other development features, as required. The Geotechnical Hazard Assessment concluded that the proposed subdivision is safe for design and construction of new single family dwellings, with consideration of a nominal geotechnical setback of 5 m from the crest of the existing slopes. The registration of a Geotechnical Restrictive Covenant is a requirement for Final Reading. An Agricultural Impact Assessment, including a hydrology review, was conducted by Upland Consulting, to add to the body of knowledge required to make informed decisions and conditions necessary to eliminate or lessen impacts from urban uses to adjacent or nearby farming activities. Recommended actions to minimize the impacts of development on the agricultural land to the east included: using stormwater and construction best practices during construction of new buildings and septic systems (if required) to minimize hydrologic impacts; installation of a minimum 6 m wide vegetative buffer, as detailed in the Ministry of Agriculture's Guide to Edge Planning and the Agricultural Land Commission's Vegetated Landscape Buffer Specifications; and including a Disclosure Statement on Title notifying new landowners of potential neighbouring agricultural activities. A vegetative buffer planting plan was submitted in support of this application. An - 4 - Enhancement and Restoration Agreement and Maintenance Agreement will be required for the Natural Features Development Permit. An Environmental Impact Assessment was conducted by Aquaterra Biological Consulting in support of the Natural Features Development Permit application. A 10 m setback was recommended around the drainage feature on the northeast corner of the northern property, 12640 Ansell Street, to be protective of the drainage feature's hydraulic function and the associated riparian vegetation; however the geotechnical considerations for the subject properties already precluded this portion from being developed. A man-made drainage ditch on the adjacent property to the east serves to capture and re -direct flow originating on the neighbouring property to the east. The ditch is anticipated to provide some habitat to bird, invertebrate and amphibian species. The recommended vegetated buffer in the Agricultural impact Assessment is anticipated to improve environmental function over existing conditions, which convey minimal cover and shade benefits. The subject properties are anticipated to be utilized occasionally by terrestrial wildlife; however, impacts as a result of the subdivision are anticipated to be negligible as the new houses on proposed Lots 3 and 4 are anticipated to be situated in areas currently occupied by manicured lawns, which confer minimal terrestrial habitat value. Existing trees will be retained where possible and incorporated into the subdivision lot layout. No tree removal should occur along or adjacent to the top -of -bank on 12640 Ansell Street. No adverse impacts to habitat connectivity and biodiversity are anticipated to occur as a result of lot subdivision and construction of two additional single family residences. e; Interdepartmental Implications: En ineering_Deoartment: The Engineering Department has indicated that there are no deficient services which could be provided by a Rezoning Servicing Agreement. It is anticipated that sanitary sewer service will be provided through a Local Area Service bylaw for the Ansell Street area, which is currently in progress. Should the Local Area Service bylaw not be adopted, the applicant will need to prove out septic feasibility for the proposed new lots and confirm that the existing septic fields are in good working condition. The Municipality has a capital works project scheduled in 2012 to improve the water supply to this area. Until the capital works project is complete, the water system is not adequate to support the subdivision,; however, it is expected that the timing of the work will have no appreciable affect on the timing of the subdivision. Additional comments from the Engineering Department will be addressed at the Subdivision stage. -5- Fire De artment: The Fire Department has requested that the driveway be a minimum of 6 m wide and that there is permanent address signage at the driveway entrance that is visible day and night. CONCLUSION: Based on the review of supporting information regarding the applications, it is recommended that Second Reading be Proposed rezoning and subdivision Bylaw No. 67g4-2011 g given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Prepared by. Michelle Bast, AScT Planning Technician Approved by: Christine Carter,Y MPL, MCIP Director of Planning Approved Frank Quinn, M �!J QM: Public Wor -7 opment Services Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer ,1 The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6794-2011 Appendix C - Proposed Subdivision Plan Appendix D - Agricultural Vegetative Buffer Plan P 43885 71 o O N n 1 i 2 J J 12665 w 12640 z Z Q BCP 44571 m 2 P 72087 m N N N 12621 126 AVE, N SCALE 1:2,500 12610 72 P 43885 73 i 12570 2 12550 P 43885 75 m z Q 12530 01 f Pitt— Mea ows 12610/40 Ansell St CORPORATION OF .. - - - THE DISTRICT OF District of i MAPLE RIDGE MAPLE RIDGE Langley -- PLANNING DEPARTMENT CHASER R. DATE: Mar 27, 2012 2011-008-RZ BY: JV P 5052 3 'LMP 22994 Subject Properties 2 APPENIDfX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6794 - 2011 A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHERE S, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6794 - 2011." 2. Those parcels or tracts of land and premises known and described as: Lot 72 Section 22 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 43885 Lot 73 Section 22 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan 43885 and outlined in heavy black line on Kiap No. 1509 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, are hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). 3- Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 22nO day of February, A.D. 2011. READ a second time the day of A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING held the day of A.D. 20 READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER P 1 P 43885 ? �p� 71 m m 0 a 1 72 24521 ALOUETTE RD. 2 1 2-- 12665L J gg BCP 44571 2 P 72087 126215 126 AVE. 126 AVE. 1 �0 N 2 X 2 i 6C 47502 P 7 85 12570 P N 2 D P 43885 83 1255s P 43885 lzsso 80 m P 43885 w 75 F 7 98 PPP 1414 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. 6794-2011 Map No. 1509 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) P 5052 3 'LMP 22994 2 12734 12700 12674 N SCALE 1:3,000 ZM T ft* �-=�, air,t: Dennis Dickson %joct- 12640 & 12610 Ansell Street Mope Ridge, BC Droving Mk - Sketch Plan Showing Existing Stuctures And Proposed New Lot Lines And Arecs Ivatew Pod locations We MOen from On tO the nmrds edge of Om pod famdatpm OI L POnhondle meoe WE not included in Apt 07vm Scde: 1: SOD PaperSize: 17' X 22" 0f Dote: AP4 23 2011 File.• MR10-524O5KE7CH2 1 APPENDIX D ri LA I n -r I -IN alp L�,L- ", I -IN le f 1 .- !0 Is , " m DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR FILE 2011-068-RZ File Manager: Amelia Bowden Official Community Plan or Zoning Bylaw Amendments: RECEIVED NOT REQUIRED 1. A completed Application Form (Schedule "A" - Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999) 2. An application fee, payable to the District of Maple Ridge, in accordance with Development Application Fee Bylaw no. 5949-2001. 3. A Certificate of Title and Consent Form if the applicant is different El from the owner shown on the Certificate of Title. 4. A legal survey of the property(ies) ® ❑ 5. Subdivision plan layout ® ❑ 6. Neighbourhood context plan 7. Lot grading plan ❑ 8. Landscape plan*+ EJ 9. Preliminary architectural plans including site plan, building elevations, accessory off-street parking and general bylaw compliance reconciliation'. These items may not be required for single-family residential applications + These items may be required for two-family residential applications, as outlined in Council Policy No. 6.01 Additional re arts rovided: Environmental Assessment Agricultural Impact Assessment Groundwater Impact Assessment DISTRICT OF Agenda Item: 1105 MAPLE RIDGE Council Meeting of: March 27, 2012 I. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6842-2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading: i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. A Statutory Right -of -Way plan and agreement for Storm Sewer must be registered at the Land Title Office; iii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations; iv. Construction of an Equestrian Trail on the north side of 130 Avenue; V. A Restrictive Covenant must be registered at the Land Title Office disclosing possible impacts of allowable agricultural activities on adjacent ALR lands. (2011-068-RZ, 25339 130 Avenue - to rezone from RS-3 [One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 [One Family Suburban Residential) to permit subdivision into four single family lots) "Ernie Daykin" CA IED DEFEATED DEFERRED MAYOR T0: _ Chief Administrative Officer ACTION NOTICE _ Gen Mgr - Corporate & Financial RCMP Fire Chief Mgr - Accounting Chief Information Officer _ Gen Mgr - Public Works & Development Dir - Planning �t Dir - Licenses, Permits & Bylaws Municipal Engineer _ Gen Mgr - Com. Dev. & Rec. Services Dir - Parks & Facilities Dir - Recreation Dir - Community Services Clerk's Section Corporate Officer Property & Risk Manager Lynn Marchand Diana Dalton ✓ Amanda Allen _ Tracy Camire Amanda Gaunt 3 Z Karen Kaake The above decision was made at a meeting of the Municipal Council held on the date noted above and is sent to you for notation and/or such action as may be required by your Department. r ff March 27. 2012 U/ 4 Date Corporate Officer MAPLE RIDGE Deep Roots Greater Heights District of maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: March 19, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: 2011-068-RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amend' -rig Bylaw No.6842-2011 25339 130 Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit subdivision into four single family lots. This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6642-2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to Final Reading: i. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; ii. A Statutory Right -of -Way plan and agreement for Storm Sewer must be registered at the Land Title Office; iii. A disclosure statement must be submitted by a Professional Engineer advising whether there is any evidence of underground fuel storage tanks. If there is evidence, a site profile pursuant to the Waste Management Act must be provided in accordance with the regulations; iv. Construction of an Equestrian Trail on the north side of 130 Avenue; V. A Restrictive Covenant must be registered at the Land Title Office disclosing possible impacts of allowable agricultural activities on adjacent ALR lands. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Joel Lycan Owner: First Colonial Investors Ltd Legal Description: South Half Lot: 13, Section: 26, Township: 12, NWD Plan: 7639 OCP: Existing: Suburban Residential Zoning: Existing: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Proposed: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Vacant Zone: P-6 (Civic Institutional) Designation: Institutional South: Use: Single Family Residential and Wholesale Nursery Zone: RS-3(One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Agricultural (ALR) East: Use: Vacant Zone: P-6 (Civic Institutional) Designation: Institutional West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: P,S-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: b) Project Description: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 1.997 hectares 130 Avenue Rural Standard The subject site is outside of the Urban Area Boundary in the Websters Corner neighbourhood and is serviced by municipal water only. The site slopes approximately five percent north to south. The site is not heavily treed, however there are significant stands of trees in the north-east and north-west corners of the property. An isolated creek is located in the northern portion of the site. Properties adjacent to the subject site on the south side of 130 Avenue are within the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR). The applicant has submitted an Agricultural Impact Assessment and Groundwater Impact Assessment as part of the rezoning application. -2- The applicant proposes to rezone the subject site to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to Permit future subdivision into four single family lots. A new road with a cul-de-sac is proposed to access all lots and the existing house will be retained on one of proposed lots. c) Planning Analysis: Offici { Communit Plan: The subject site is designated Suburban Residential in the Official Community Plan which permits a single detached housing form located outside of the Urban Area Boundary. The RS-2 (One Family _)ub rban Residential) zone is i„ , O.Mp,iu Ce JUUUi uq�i n nnm I'onn with this des.,n Ion, and requirPC city water sewage disposal provided by a private system. t.,_ and zoning_Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at 25339 130 Avenue from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit future subdivision into four single family lots. The proposed lots meet the minimum requirements of the RS-2 ( One Family Suburban Residential) zone and no variances will be required for this application. D velo ment Permits: A Watercourse Protection Development Permit is required for the preservation, restoration and enhancement of the Triple Creek located in the northern portion of the subject site. A security will be taken as a condition of the issuance of the Development Permit to ensure that the conditions of the Development Permit are met. d) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering D epartm,-nt- The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed development has advised that all required services do not exist. It will therefore be necessary for the owner to enter into a Rezoning Servicing Agreement and post securities to complete the work identified in that agreement prior to Final Reading. Furthermore, the Engineering Department has identified that the applicant will need to obtain a Right -of -Way for storm sewer through the property south of 130 Avenue. The proposed lots will be serviced by Type 1 septic systems. Environmental: The property is subject to a Watercourse Protection Development Permit due to the location of Triple Creek on the site. The applicant has submitted an Environmental Assessment, Arborist Report, Agricultural Impact Assessment, and Groundwater Impact Assessment is support of the project. As AIR lands do not directly abut the subject site, the proposed development's impact on agricultural land is anticipated to be indirect. The report suggests providing disclosures for homebuyers about the possible impacts of allowable agricultural activities and using best management practices to minimize impacts on drainage. The BC Ministry of Environment records indicate that there are no deep wells located in the immediate surrounding area of the subject site that may be affected by the proposed development. ISM Environmental staff have reviewed the development proposal and has determined that a tree protection covenant will be required to preserve significant trees that can be retained outside of the septic and house locations - particularly in the north-east and north-west corners of the subject site. The applicant has proposed to collect water draining onto the site into an open channel that will drain into an open bioswale running along the west side of the proposed road. Parks & Leisure Services Department: The Parks & Leisure Services has identified that the applicant will be required to provide a boulevard eq_,eS1. .. trail on file north Side Cf 2!1 6 en�ie along the frnr1taCa f th `� aclse 0 e subdivicinn. Fire Department: The Fire Department has reviewed the proposed development and has requested that driveway accesses for all lots be no less than 6 metres wide. CONCLUSION: The proposed RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone complies with the Suburban Residential designation of the Official Community Plan. It is therefore recommended that Zone amending Bylaw No. 6842-2011 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing. TPrepared by: Amelia Bowden Planning Technician Approved by. Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP luDi,,,efor of Planning 4 Approved b . Frank Quinn, MBA,-P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services Concurrence: J: L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer AB/dp The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Zone Amending Bylaw 6842-2011 Appendix C- Subdivision Plan MI! 1APP'EN DiX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE SYLt;.iN NO. 6842-2011 A Bylaw to amend Map 'A' forming part of Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 -1985 as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510 - 1985 as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No. 6842-2011." 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: South Half Lot 13, Section 26, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan 7E39 and outlined in heavy black line on Map No. 1130 a copy of which is attached hereto and forms paq of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburvan Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 35'' O -1985 as arnerode` and Map "A" attache_, thereto are hereby amended accordingly. BEAD a first time the 26th day of Euly, A.D. 2-011. READ a second time the day of . A.D. 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of A.D. 20 . READ a third time the day of , A.D. 20 . APPROVED by the Minister of Transportation this day of A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of A.D. 20 . PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER Paml A �s P83g1 LRW 2! 3w Rim 2 S of r 25 n i coi LMF 253g1 24i 1 n Cif i 130 AVE. P 20MI EP 18840 2 A F 783E F 7634 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw NO. 6842-2011 Map No. 1530 From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) N SCALE 1:3,0W PROPOSED SUBDI4SI0ht OF SO(fIK HALF LOT f 3 SECTION 26 TOWNSHIP 12 N.W.D. PLAN 7639 B.C.G.S. 92G.028 This plan lies within the Greater Vancouver Regional District nhE Pign SO Offm fne A dcbon of the Maxo+n!r Drrrsr for fhe Municiparity of Mopk Ridge Scale 1.500 SWikwid�d P aQa of M Om i 432 mm h Witt by S0 ) Wm plofdd er o naa, of 1.5W 2 NOVEMM 7,aff NO& Contours gWmn3 d by oaw! ROAD Pion WP1275 6 Ix 130 AVENUE Ir — — — — — — — — — — — — N1.I I I I � 7639 I P. r2 I 1 I eiat J�1 I 1 wr� 'J li A Ran 8369E 73--a meat-r63-<7SI DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR FILE RZ/ 109/08 File Manager: Rasika Acharya Official Community Plan or Zoning Bylaw Amendments: RECEIVED NOT REQUIRED 1. A completed Application Form ® ❑ (Schedule "A" - Development Procedures Bylaw No. 5879-1999) 2. An application fee, payable to the District of Maple Ridge, in accordance with Development Application Fee Bylaw no. 5949-2001. 3. A Certificate of Title and Consent Form if the applicant is different El from the owner shown on the Certificate of Title. 4. A legal survey of the property(ies) ® ❑ 5. Subdivision plan layout EJ 6. Neighbourhood context plan ® ❑ 7. Lot grading plan 8. Landscape plan*+ ® ❑ 9. Preliminary architectural plans including site plan, building elevations, accessory off-street parking and general bylaw compliance reconciliation`+. These items may not be required for single-family residential applications + These items may be required for two-family residential applications, as outlined in Council Policy No. 6.01 Additional re arts rovided: Statement of Significance Geotechnical Report DISTRICT OF Agenda Item: 1101 MAPLE RIDGE Council Meeting of: March 13, 2012 I. In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act consultation during OCP amendment, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; V. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies; and in that regard staff recommends that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment; 2. That Bylaw No. 6902-2012 be given first reading; and 3. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; ii. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; Registration of a Geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iv. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Duplex Design to regulate the form and character of Duplex 2 (units 3 and 4) and a landscaping plan by the Landscape Architect, showing all the proposed landscaping on site, along with 100% of the landscaping securities; V. Road dedication as required; vi. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking. (RZ/109/08, 22031 Dewdney Trunk Road - Heritage Designation and Revitalization and Tax Exemption Agreement Bylaw to allow for the preservation, relocation and rehabilitation of an existing single family heritage house) CA ED DEFEATED DEFERRED "Ernie Daykin" MAYOR TO: _ Chief Administrative Officer ACTION NOTICE _ Gen Mgr - Corporate & Financial Mgr - Accounting _,Gen Mgr - Public Works & Development I' Dir - Planning Dir - Licenses, Permits & Bylaws Municipal Engineer _ Gen Mgr - Com. Dev. & Rec. Services Clerk's Section Corporate Officer 'Property & Risk Manager Amanda Allen Amanda Gaunt Karen Kaake The above decision was made at a meeting of the Municipal Council held on the date noted above and is sent to you for notation and/or such action as may be required by your Department. March 13 2012 Date Corporate Officer DISTRICT C Agenda ItE 1102 MAKE RIDGE Council Meeting of: March 27, 2012 I. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act Opportunity and on- going consultation has been provided by way of posting Bylaw No. 6907-20 2for on thelmunicipal website and requiring that the applicant host a Development Information Meeting, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a public hearing on the bylaw; 2. That Bylaw No. 6907-2012 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 3. That it be confirmed that Bylaw No. 6907- 2012 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That Bylaw No. 6907-2012 be given First and Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 5. That Bylaw No. 6902-2012 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading: i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; ii. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; iii. Registration of a Geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iv. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Duplex Design to regulate the form and character of Duplex 2 (units 3 and 4) and a landscaping plan by the Landscape Architect, showing all the proposed landscaping on site, along with 100% of the landscaping securities; V. Road dedication as required; vi. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking. (RZ/109/08, 22031 Dewdney Trunk Road - to allow for the preservation, relocation and rehabilitation of the existing heritage house on the subject site to create one duplex building together with a newly designed second duplex building on the property, for a total of four units on the site) OPPOSZ-0- C.AF_L_c C IED DEFEATED DEFERRED "Ernie Daykin" MAYOR TO: _ Chief Administrative Officer _ Gen Mgr - Corporate & Financial Mgr - Accounting Chief Information Officer �n Mgr - Public Works & Dir - Planning Dir - Licenses, Permits & Municipal Engineer _ Gen Mgr - Com. Dev. & Rec. Services Clerk's Section Corporate Officer ,Property & Risk Manager Diana Dalton Amanda Allen �C Amanda Gaunt 2 The above decision was made at a meeting of the Municipal Council held on the date noted above and is sent to you for notation and/or such action as may be required by your Department. ACTION NOTICE March 27 201 Date Corporate Officer 1 - DIStrIC� Deep Racts Of Tapia Ridge Bmater Heights TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: March 19, 2012 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ/109/08 FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: First and Second Reading Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6907-2012; Second Reading Maple Ridge Heritage Designation and Revitalization and Tax Exemption Agreement Bylaw No. 6902-2012 22031 Dewdney Trunk Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On March 13, 2012 Council gave First Reading to the Heritage Designation and Revitalization and Tax Exemption Agreement bylaw (HRA bylaw), for the property located at 22031 Dewdney Trunk Road. This is to allow for the preservation, relocation and rehabilitation of the existing heritage house on the subject site. The project involves converting the existing single-family heritage house into a duplex, rotating it by 90 degrees and relocating it on site closer to Dewdney Trunk Road, with a newly designed second duplex building proposed on the property, for a total of four units on the site. Included in the HRA bylaw is a proposed five-year property tax exemption, on the municipal portion of property taxes, for the existing heritage building only (see Duplex 1 in Appendix B). RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That in accordance with Section 879 of the Local Government Act opportunity for early and on -going consultation has been provided byway of posting Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6907-2012 on the municipal website and requiring that the applicant host a Development Information Meeting, and Council considers it unnecessary to provide any further consultation opportunities, except by way of holding a public hearing on the bylaw; 2. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6907-2012 be considered in conjunction with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 3. That it be confirmed that Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6907- 2012 is consistent with the Capital Expenditure Plan and Waste Management Plan; 4. That Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6907-2012 be given First and Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; 5. That Maple Ridge Heritage Designation and Revitalization and Tax Exemption Agreement Bylaw No. 6902-2012 be given Second Reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 6. That the following terms and conditions be met prior to final reading. i. Approval from the Ministry of Transportation; ii. Registration of a Rezoning Servicing Agreement as a Restrictive Covenant and receipt of the deposit of security as outlined in the Agreement; iii. Registration of a Geotechnical report as a Restrictive Covenant which addresses the suitability of the site for the proposed development; iv. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant for the Duplex Design to regulate the form and character of Duplex 2 (units 3 and 4) and a landscaping plan by the Landscape Architect, showing all the proposed landscaping on site, along with 100% of the landscaping securities; V. Road dedication as required; vi. Registration of a Restrictive Covenant protecting the Visitor Parking. a) Background Context: Applicant: Wayne Bissky Owner: Grayston Contracting Ltd Legal Description: Lot: 141, DL: 396, Plan: 29594; PID: 003-072-762 OCP: Existing: Urban Residential Zoning: Proposed: Heritage Revitalization Agreement Existing: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Proposed: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) with a Heritage Surrounding Uses: Revitalization Agreement North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential South: Use: Dewdney Trunk Road and Single Family Residential Zone: Road and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Road and Urban Residential East: Use: Duplex Zone: RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential West: Use: York Street and Single Family Residential Zone: Road and RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Road and Urban Residential -2- Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: b) Project Description: Histo of the site nd herita a house: Single Family Residential Multi -Family Townhouse Residential 0.25 acre (1029.99 m2) York Street Full Urban None The subject site (see Appendix A) is listed in the Maple Ridge Heritage Inventory and its heritage value lies in the existing farmhouse that was constructed by Joseph Beeton in 1911. The house underwent extensions by lifting it to add a basement, additional rooms and a shed dormer along the east side but retains significant heritage value. A Statement of Significance was prepared by a Heritage professional and is attached to this report as part of the HRA document. In 1919, the Daykin family purchased the house and continued farming on the 10-acre lot. In 1966, the large farm plot was subdivided into 22 smaller single family lots to accommodate the changing needs of the community. This historic house was home to the Daykin family over the course of 52 years and resold in 1971. The historic structure, despite many external and internal changes to its fabric over the 98 years, preserves sufficient early fabric to maintain the character and charm of an early 20'h century farmhouse. Heritage Revitalization A reement: The subject HRA bylaw application was received in late 2008, making it the first one ever negotiated in the District. However, it was not the first one to be completed, as two more HRA applications followed in 2009 and 2010. Early in the negotiation process of the subject application, it was agreed that the application would proceed with only a Statement of Significance to support the HRA. A Statement of Significance provides information on the history of the site, identifies the site's heritage value, and lists the specific character defining elements. Additionally, the architect agreed to prepare architectural plans for the heritage building with notes clearly identifying what alterations will be made and also how character defining elements will be preserved. As such, a Statement of Significance, completed by a heritage consultant and the architectural plans are attached to the HRA bylaw document and outlines the heritage value and character defining elements of the site (see Schedule B of Appendix C). The owner intends to rehabilitate and then relocate the heritage house on the same lot and add a new duplex (see Duplex 2 in Appendix B) in a design that is similar to the character of the existing heritage house. The historic structure, despite many external and internal changes over the 98 years, preserves sufficient early fabric to maintain the character and charm of an early 201h century farmhouse. The Statement of Significance is incorporated into the Heritage Agreement bylaw for reference. An HRA, written in the form of a bylaw can vary or supplement provisions of the development related bylaws. Hence, the property will remain zoned RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential), but will be 3- regulated by HRA bylaw and a Duplex Design Covenant, each which will outline the responsibilities of the owners. The Proposal: The proposal is to convert the single-family site to multi -family with two duplex buildings that will be accessed from York Street. It is intended to rotate the existing heritage house by 90 degrees, north so that the side that is currently facing York Street will face Dewdney Trunk Road. The building will also be moved 30 feet closer to Dewdney Trunk Road. Then the interior of the house will be renovated, so that it is converted into two separate strata units. Changes to some of the "character - defining elements" listed in the Statement of Significance, are proposed to accommodate the change in use from single-family to duplex form. The units in the heritage building (see Duplex 1 in Appendix B) are each to be two -bedroom units of 1742 ft2 and 1318 ft2. A new building containing two duplex units (see Duplex 2 in Appendix B) is also proposed for the site, each containing three bedrooms at sizes of 1396 ftI2 and 1407 ft2 . Tax Exemption Byl_ew Under Section 225(2) (b) of the Community Charter, a municipality may exempt protected heritage properties from the municipal portion of taxation. It is proposed that upon approval and completion of a four unit development of the subject site, a five year tax exemption would be granted to the Duplex 1 (Beeton House rehabilitated), but is not applicable to Duplex 2. The tax exemption of heritage property is not new to the District. A 5-year tax exemption was granted to both the Miller Residence and Billy Miner Pub in exchange for protection of these properties through Heritage Revitalization Agreements, respectively passed in 2010 and 2011. The municipal portion of the taxes for the "Beeton House" on the subject site was $1564.75 for 2010 and $1714.95 for the 2011 taxes. c) Planning Analysis: Official Communitv Plan: Section 966 of the Local Government Act specifies provisions for local governments to negotiate HRA's within their jurisdictions. The mechanism provides flexibility and ensures the retention of non- conforming heritage resources that may otherwise be demolished. The existing house on subject site is listed on the heritage resource inventory and should be preserved for its character defining elements. Several policies (Policy 4-41 to 4-45) within the Official Community Plan recognize and encourage protection and management of heritage inventory within the District. The subject property is designated "Urban Residential" and is subject to the Major Corridor Infill policies in the Official Community Plan and the proposed use is in compliance with this designation. Section 8.4 of the Official Community Plan specifies Development Permit Area exemptions. For this application an OCP amendment is proposed to establish a policy that will authorize waiving the requirement of a Development Permit where changes to a heritage building are proposed as part of -4- the original HRA bylaw and where the architectural plans specifying the changes are attached to the bylaw. A Development Permit Exemption is valid for heritage buildings as it is regulated by the HRA and Heritage Alteration Permit. Refer to Development Permit and Heritage Alteration Permit sections of this report for further details. Zonin BVlaw: The HRA bylaw has the power to supersede a Zoning Bylaw. As a result, the site will remain zoned RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) and the HRA will establish the regulations for preserving heritage value as well as adding new development to the site. Schedule "F" of the attached HRA bylaw (Appendix C) outlines the zoning regulations that will apply to the subject site. The closest applicable zoning to the development proposed for the subject site is RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District). The RM-1 zone permits a maximum density of 0.6 times the lot area and the subject development proposal is seeking a density of 0.75. Setbacks are also proposed that do not meet the requirements of the RM-1 zone. While the Local Government Act makes a provision that setbacks within a Zoning Bylaw may be varied, there is no such provision for density. The proposed development compares to the requirements of the RM-1 (Townhouse Residential) zone) as follows: CRITERIA 1. Minimum Lot size (m 2. Minimum Lot Depth 3. Minimum Lot Width 4. Maximum density 5. Building Setbacks: Front Rear Interior Side Exterior Side 6. Maximum Height 7. Minimum Usable Open Space 8. Minimum Common Amenity Area 9. Minimum parking 10. � Landscaping 11. + Off -Street Parking PROPOSAL (HRA) 854.1 m2 38.38 22.25 m 0.75 times the net lot area (640.57 m2) 4.58 m 7.45 m 4.36 m 2.94 m 9.6 m 457 m2 Included in usable open space 9 spaces (8 residential plus 1 visitor) 1m high landscape border around the visitor parking spot; all other parking spaces are concealed. 8 residential (two tandem spaces) and 1 visitor space -5- RM-1 ZONE 557m2 Not applicable 18.0 m 0.6 times the net lot area (512.46 m2) plus 50m2 per unit basement area. 7.5 m 7.5 m 4.5 m (without window) or 6.0 m (with window) 1.5 m 10.5m and 2 1%2 storey 150 m2 20 m2 9 spaces (8 residential plus 1 visitor) 1m high landscape border for non -concealed parking spaces 8 residential and 0.8 visitor spaces Off -Street Parkin and Laadin Bylaw: As per the Maple Ridge Off -Street Parking and Loading Bylaw No. 4350-1990, the proposed use (i.e. two duplexes or four units) requires 2 parking spaces per unit for residents plus 0.2 spaces per unit for visitors, requiring a total of 9 parking spaces (8 for residents and 1 visitor parking stall). The proposal is in compliance of this requirement and shows 2 car garages per unit and one parking space for visitors. Dev to ment Permit and Herita a Alter.. Neither of the first two HRA bylaws passed in 2010 and 2011 proposed any alterations to the heritage value of their respective sites that would result in the requirement for a Development Permit or a Heritage Alteration Permit. The subject HRA bylaw is the first to trigger the requirements under a Development Permit and a Heritage Alteration Permit. Development Permit: A site protected through a HRA bylaw is not exempt from Development Permit requirements, depending on intended use, such as the multi -family use for this application. As such, an amendment to the Official Community Plan is required for this proposal and the OCP Amending Bylaw is anticipated to be considered by Council with the Second Reading of the HRA bylaw. This OCP amendment is to establish a policy in Section 8.4 (Development Permit Area Exemptions) that will authorize waiving the requirement of a Development Permit where changes to a heritage building are proposed as part of the original HRA bylaw and where the architectural plans specifying the changes are attached to the bylaw. Any future charges proposed to a protected heritage site, that would normally require a Development Permit. would instead just require a Heritage Alteration Permit. The design of the new duplex building that is proposed for the site will be protected over the long- term through a Building Design Restrictive Covenant. Heritage Alteration Permit: Section 971 of the Local Government Act requires that no alteration of a protected heritage building is permitted without a Heritage Alteration Permit, unless explicitly stated in the Heritage bylaw that protects the heritage site. The subject HRA bylaw template, that the Planning Department has used to date, contains a clause under the heading "Exemptions" (See Appendix C, page 2), which describes which of the minor and repair type of changes are permitted to a heritage building without triggering the requirement for a heritage alteration permit. A Heritage Procedures Bylaw defining procedures involved in applying for and issuing a Heritage Alteration Permit, along with procedures for applying for a Heritage Revitalization Agreement, Heritage Designation, and adding sites to the Maple Ridge Community Heritage Register, is currently being drafted and is expected to be brought forward for Council consideration in the near future. In the interim, it is anticipated that a Heritage Alteration Permit application for the subject site will be brought forward to a future Council meeting wherein final reading of the HRA bylaw is scheduled. f� d) Review process: Adviso Desi n Panel: Although it is proposed that a Development Permit be waived for this application, the applicant was requested to present at the Advisory Design Panel meeting and the project was reviewed by the panel on January 13, 2009. The Panel commended the applicant and encourages similar projects to be undertaken in the community. The panel supports retention of suitable existing trees and would like to receive a digital version of project -material for information purposes only. The Panel strongly recommended the following be addressed by the applicant and submitted to planning staff for review: • use of appropriate material (siding, roofing and windows) to match the period (era) • provide additional information on landscape materials; • consistent detailing; • pedestrian circulation on the east side; and • Simplification of roof forms on the new building. The project -architect has addressed all the concerns through some revisions and the rehabilitation plan. Community Herita a Commission: On February 3, 2009 this proposal was reviewed at the Community Heritage Commission meeting. The Commission was generally supportive g y of this project with the following comments: Use Statement of Significance that was prepared for the site as a guide for conservation of character -defining elements in conjunction with the "Standards & Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada"; • The above includes the horse chestnut tree at the front of the property; and • When the project has been completed with the construction of additional units, the heritage house should be distinguishable from the new units. This does not mean that the project shouldn't appear uniform, but the average person should be able to recognize a difference in time between the existing unit and the new ones. The project -architect has confirmed these are addressed through the rehabilitation plan. Members of the Commission are supportive of this application. The Heritage Commission was briefed with an update on the project at the February 7, 2012 meeting and the members had no further comment. Development Information Meeting: On April 8, 2009 the project -architect conducted a Development Information Meeting at Maple Ridge Travelodge from 7:00 to 9:00 PM. This meeting was attended by 6 people who were generally -7- supportive of the project and had positive comments. They were pleased that the site was going to be improved and they found the proposal attractive. e) Interdepartmental implications: En ineerin De artmerrt: The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and has the following comments: Road dedications of 3.0 m along Dewdney Trunk Road and 2.4 m along York Street to make it a collector standard road; corner truncation of 3m X 3m on the corner of York Street and Dewdney Trunk Road is required. Existing power pole may have to be moved. ® Road upgrades fronting the property including curb & gutter (on the east side of York Street), sidewalk (1.6 m wide concrete sidewalk on the east side of York Street), Street lighting and Street Trees (on the boulevard along Dewdney Trunk Road and York Street); pedestrian letdown at sidewalk intersection of York Street and Dewdney Trunk Road are required. Remove the existing sidewalk driveway crossing on Dewdney Trunk Road and reconstruct with standard barrier curb and sidewalk. Any new municipal service connection must be placed at 2% slope and the sewer main is on the west side of the road and will need crossing of a water main. Install a catch basin and lead at north end of the curb on York Street. Any trees along Dewdney Trunk Road must comply with the Highway and Traffic Bylaw for distance to the intersection and visibility sight line area along the boulevard. The municipal road boulevard must be planted with only lawn grass and Street Trees; any other shrubs or plants are to be planted on the private property. The existing chain link fence along west and south sides of the property is to be removed. Existing aboveground utility company plant fronting the site on both York Street and Dewdney Trunk Road will remain, in accordance with Schedule D of the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw. However, all the utility company service connections to the development must be underground. Parks &Leisure Services De artment: The Parks & Leisure Services Department have identified that after the HRA bylaw is registered and the project built, they will be responsible for maintaining the street trees. In the case of this project it is estimated that there will be an additional 6 trees which is based on the proposed landscape plan by DMG Landscape Architects, dated December 4, 2008. The Manager of Parks & Open Space has advised that the maintenance requirement of $25.00 per new tree will increase their budget requirements by $150.00. Fire Department: The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and do not have any comments at this time. M Licences Permits & B Maws Department: The Building Department has reviewed the proposal and has the following comment: Ensure code compliance for the spatial separation requirement of structures and for the proposed driveway design (driveway slope, break -over angle, maximum angle of approach and departure, etc). Finan ial Im lica ion : In accordance with Council's Landscape Security Policy, a refundable security equivalent to 100% of the estimated landscape cost, provided by a Landscape Architect, will be provided to ensure satisfactory provision of landscaping on site. This is a condition of the final reading as stated in this report. f) Intergovernmental issues: Local Governor nt Ac : In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council has considered at the March 13, 2012 Council Meeting, whether consultation is required with specifically: i. the board of the regional district in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a municipal official community plan; ii. the board of any regional district that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. the council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. first nations; V. school district boards, greater boards and improvements district boards, and vi. the provincial and federal governments and their agencies. and in that regard recommends that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. An amendment to the Official Community Plan requires the local government to consult with any affected parties and to adopt related bylaws in compliance with the procedures outlined in Section 882 of the Act. The amendment required for this application, Appendix D, has been considered and it has been determined that no additional consultation beyond existing procedures is required, including referrals to the Board of the Regional District, the Council of an adjacent municipality, First Nations, the School District or agencies of the Federal and Provincial Governments. The amendment has been reviewed with the Financial Plan/Capital Plan and the Waste Management Plan of the Greater Vancouver Regional District and determined to have no impact. lAinistn, of Trans ortation: On December 23, 2008 the District received a preliminary approval from the Ministry of Transportation for the Proposed development. Final approval will be sought following Council giving Third Reading for the proposed development. CONCLUSION: As specified in Section 966 of the Local Government Act a Heritage Revitalization Agreement is a Powerful tool for heritage conservation. A HRA bylaw is intended to provide flexibility that benefits the community, the municipality and the property owner. This is most importantly a way for local government to encourage property owners to revitalize or restore any property of potential heritage value. It is a tool that can supersede local zoning regulations and provide incentives to make it viable for owners to conserve and preserve property of heritage merit. This being the third HRA bylaw in the District, it is an effort towards preserving and rehabilitating the 1911 Beeton house which is listed on District's heritage resource inventory. In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, for consultation during an Official Community Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required except by way of holding a public hearing on the bylaw. Prepared by: Rasika Acharya, B-Arch, M-Tech, LID, LEED® AP, MCIP Planner Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP Director of Pinning Approve by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng G : Public Work�&De elopment Services Concurrence: . (Jim) Rule hief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A - Subject Map Appendix B - Proposed Site Plan with Proposed New Duplex and Landscaping Plan Appendix C -'Heritage Revitalization Bylaw and Tax Exemption Agreement No. 6902-2012 Appendix D - Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6907-2012 10- 42 198 N SCALE 1:750 40 12041 co 39 rn N 12031 °- 38 I 37 O N O N N 651 43 O N N 10 co Rem N 43 67 12047 1 12042 68 N 12041 m2 T 12034 �- 1202 ' 69 9 Subject Property P 29 94 co T 141 142 M ,'I - CD 0 N N N N P 14571 4 N O N N N13 14 P 13 19 1 113 P 728 11993 Ci f Pitt- Mea Gws { . 22031 Dewdney Trunk Road CORPORATION OF THE DISTRIC T OF > District of =. --- . _.. ..--i , MAPLE RIDGE Langley % PLANNING DEPARTMENT ERASER q- ��� DATE: Mar 27, 2012 RZ/109/08 BY: JV :,SZ Ueid aa!S Pasou_ld APPENDIX E l..G By U:Ilezyn.AGLJ ef)4"H AJISSIL NiHdAZ 3NAYM ; E I : f U L N C Ip !U I` 0 0 z O m c E 75 aW 1-1 7: a f f�ii f€itjj` I all r � � 3 t >u V2 4 p i Y�S d APPENDIX C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO. 6902-2012 A Bylaw to designate a property as a heritage property under Section 967 of the Local Government Act and to enter into a Heritage Revitalization Agreement under Section 966 of the Local Government Act and to grant a Tax Exemption under Section 225 of the Community Charter WHEREAS the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge considers that the property located at 22031 Dewdney Trunk Road, Maple Ridge, BC has heritage value and that certain portions of buildings on the property should be designated as protected under section 967 of the Local Government Act; AND WHEREAS the District of Maple Ridge and Grayston Contracting Ltd. (Inc. No. 364839) wish to enter into a Heritage Revitalization Agreement for the Property; AND WHEREAS the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge wishes to exercise its discretion under section 225 of the Community Charter to exempt a portion of the Property from municipal property taxation subject to the terms of an exemption agreement; AND WHEREAS the District of Maple Ridge has provided notice of a proposed tax exemption bylaw in accordance with section 227 of the Community Charte, NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: Citation 1.1 This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Heritage Designation and Revitalization and Tax Exemption, Agreement Bylaw 6902-2012". Interpretation 2.1 In this Bylaw, the terms "heritage value", "heritage character" and "alter" have the corresponding meanings given to them in the Local Government Act. Heritage Revitalization and Tax Exemption Agreement 3.1 The District of Maple Ridge enters into a Heritage Revitalization and a Tax Exemption Agreement (the "Agreement") with the registered owner of the property located at 22031 Dewdney Trunk Road, Maple Ridge and legally described as PID: 003-072-762, Lot 141, District Lot 396, Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 29594 (the "Property"). 3.2 The Acting Mayor and Corporate Officer are authorized on behalf of the District of Maple Ridge Council to sign and seal the Agreement in the form attached as Appendix "1" to this Bylaw. 3.3 Subject to all of the terms and conditions set out in the Agreement, the Land and the Existing Heritage Building, excluding the New Building, as described in the Agreement, shall be exempt from District property taxation for a term of five (5) years effective from the date on which the Agreement comes into force. Heritage Designation 4.1 Council hereby designates that portion of the Property on which is located the Existing Heritage Building, as described in the Agreement, as protected heritage property for the purposes of section 967 of the Local Government Act of British Columbia. Exemptions 5.1 The following actions may be undertaken in relation to the Existing Heritage Building without first obtaining a heritage alteration permit from the District: (a) non-structural renovations or alterations to the interior of the building or structure that do not affect any protected interior feature or fixture and do not alter the exterior appearance of the building or structure; and (b) non-structural normal repairs and maintenance that do not alter the exterior appearance of a building or structure. 5.2 For the purpose of section 5.1, "normal repairs" means the repair or replacement of elements, components or finishing materials of a building, structure or protected feature or fixture, with elements, components or finishing materials that are equivalent to those being replaced in terms of heritage character, material composition, colour, dimensions and quality. READ A FIRST TIME this day of READ A SECOND TIME this day of PUBLIC HEARING held this day of READ A THIRD TIME this day of ADOPTED this day of PRESIDING MEMBER , 2012. 2012 12012. , 2012. , 2012. CORPORATE OFFICER APPENDIX "1" - HERITAGE REVITALIZATION AND TAX EXEMPTION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT dated for reference the day of , 20 is BETWEEN: GRAYSTON CONTRACTING LTD. (INC. No. 364839) 21500 - 121 Avenue Maple Ridge, B.C. V2X 3S4 (the "Owner") AND: THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE 11995 Haney Place Maple Ridge, British Columbia V2X 6A9 (the "District") WHEREAS: �. The Owner is the registered owner in fee simple of the land and all improvements located at 22031 Dewdney Trunk Road. Maple Ridge, B.C. and legally described as: PID: 003-072-762 Lot 141 District Lot 396 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 29594 (the "Land"); B. There is one principal building currently situated on the Land, known as the Beeton/Daykin Residence, as shown on the sketch map attached as Schedule "A" to this Agreement (the "Existing Heritage Building"), and the District and the Owner agree that the Existing Heritage Building has heritage merit and should be conserved; C. The Owner intends to apply to the District for approval to rotate the Existing Heritage Building on the Land and to construct a new building at the rear of the site, as shown on the sketch map attached as Schedule "A" (the "New Building"); D. For the purposes of this Agreement, the Existing Heritage Building does not include the New Building; >=. Section 966 of the Local Government Act authorizes a local government to enter into a Heritage Revitalization Agreement with the owner of heritage property, and to allow variations of, and supplements to, the provisions of a bylaw or a permit issued under Part 26 or Part 27 of the Local Government Act; Section 225 of the Community Charter authorizes a local government to enter into an agreement with the owner of eligible heritage property that is to be exempt from municipal taxation, respecting the extent of the exemption and the conditions on which it is made; C. The Owner and the District have agreed to enter into this Heritage Revitalization and Tax Exemption Agreement setting out the terms and conditions by which the heritage value of the Land and the Existing Heritage Building is to be preserved and protected, in return for specified supplements and variances to District bylaws and the exemption of the Land and the Existing Heritage Building, excluding the New Building, from District property taxation for a specified term; H. The date of final adoption of the bylaw to which this Agreement is attached is the "Effective Date"; THIS AGREEMENT is evidence that in consideration of the sum of ten dollars ($10.00) now paid by each party to the other and for other good and valuable consideration (the receipt of which each party hereby acknowledges) the Owner and the District each covenant with the other as follows: Conservation of the Existing Heritage Building 1. The Owner shall, promptly following the Effective Date, commence and complete the restoration, renovation and conservation of the Character Defining Elements in the Existing Heritage Building (the "Work"), as identified in the Statement of Significance attached as Schedule "B", which Work shall be done in accordance with the approved plans and specifications attached as Schedule "C" to this Agreement (the "Conservation Plans"). 2. The Owner shall not alter the Character Defining Elements except in accordance with the Conservation Plans. 3. Prior to commencement of the Work, the Owner shall obtain from the District all necessary permits and licences, including a heritage alteration permit. 4. The Work shall be done at the Owner's sole expense in accordance with generally accepted engineering, architectural and heritage conservation practices. If any conflict or ambiguity arises in the interpretation of the Conservation Plans, the parties agree that the conflict or ambiguity shall be resolved in accordance with the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, Second Edition, published by Parks Canada in 2010, or any future update to this edition. 5. The Owner shall, at the Owner's sole expense, engage a member of the Architectural Institute of British Columbia or the British Columbia Association of Heritage Professionals or the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia (the "Registered Professional") to oversee the Work and to perform the duties set out in section 6 of this Agreement. 6. The Owner shall cause the Registered Professional to: (a) prior to commencement of the Work, provide to the District an executed and sealed Confirmation of Commitment in the form attached as Schedule "D" to this Agreement; (b) erect on the Land and keep erected throughout the course of the Work, a sign of sufficient size and visibility to effectively notify contractors and tradespersons entering onto the Land that the Work involves protected heritage property and is being carried out for heritage conservation purposes; (c) throughout the course of the Work, effectively oversee the work of all contractors and tradespersons and inspect all materials leaving and arriving at the site to ensure that the Work is carried out in accordance with the Conservation Plans; (d) obtain the District's approval for any changes to the Work, including any amended permits that may be required; (e) upon substantial completion of the Work, provide to the District an executed and sealed Certification of Compliance in the form attached as Schedule "E" to this Agreement; and (f) notify the District within one (1) business day if the Registered Professional's engagement by the Owner is terminated for any reason. Timing of Restoration 7. The Owner shall commence and complete all actions required for the completion of the Work in accordance with this Agreement within 12 months following the Effective Date. Ongoing Maintenance 8. Following completion of the Work, the Owner shall, in perpetuity, maintain the Existing Heritage Building and the Land in good repair in accordance with the maintenance standards set out in Maple Ridge Heritage Site Maintenance Standards Bylaw No. 6710-2009. Damage to or Destruction of the Existing Heritage Building 9. If the Existing Heritage Building is damaged, the Owner shall obtain a heritage alteration permit and any other necessary permits and licences and, in a timely manner. shall restore and repair the Existing Heritage Building to the same condition and appearance that existed before the damage occurred. 10. If, in the opinion of the District, the Existing Heritage Building is completely destroyed and the Owner wishes to construct a replacement building on the Land, such replacement building must be constructed in compliance with the District's Zoning Bylaw, in a style that is acceptable to the District and substantially similar to that of the destroyed Existing Heritage Building, after having obtained a heritage alteration permit and all other necessary permits and licences. 11. The Owner shall use its best efforts to commence and complete any repairs to the Existing Heritage Building, or the construction of any replica or replacement buildings, with reasonable dispatch. Variations to District's Zoning Bylaw 12. District of Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No. 3510-1985 (the "Zoning Bylaw") is varied and supplemented in its application to the Land and the Existing Heritage Building in the manner and to the extent set out in Schedule "F" to this Agreement. Heritage Designation 13. The Owner hereby irrevocably agrees to the designation of that portion of the Land containing the Existing Heritage Building as a municipal heritage site in accordance with section 967 of the Local Government Act, and releases the District from any obligation to compensate the Owner in any form for any reduction in the market value of the Land or those portions of the Land that may result from the designation. Tax Exemption Conditions 14. The District hereby exempts from District property taxation, for five (5) years following the Effective Date, the Land and the Existing Heritage Building, excluding the New Building, on the following conditions: (a) all items agreed to within this Agreement must be met; (b) any other fees and charges related to the Land, the Existing Heritage Building, and the New Building due to the District of Maple Ridge are paid in full; and (c) the Owner is not in contravention of any other District of Maple Ridge bylaw. 15. If any condition set out in section 14 above is not met to the satisfaction of the District, acting reasonably then the Owner must pay to the District the full amount of tax exemptions received, plus interest, immediately upon written demand. interpretation 16. In this Agreement, "Owner" shall mean the registered owner of the Land or a subsequent registered owner of the Land, as the context requires or permits. Conformity with District Bylaws 17. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that, except as expressly varied by this Agreement, any development or use of the Land, including any construction, restoration and repair of the Existing Heritage Building and the New Building, must comply with all applicable bylaws of the District. Statutory Authority Retained 1B. Nothing in this Agreement shall limit, impair, fetter or derogate from the statutory powers of the District, all of which powers may be exercised by the District from time to time and at any time to the fullest extent that the District is enabled. Indemnity 19. The Owner hereby releases, indemnifies and saves the District, its officers, employees, elected officials, agents and assigns harmless from and against any and all actions, causes of action, losses, damages, costs, claims, debts and demands whatsoever by any person, arising out of or in any way due to the existence or effect of any of the restrictions or requirements in this Agreement, or the breach or non-performance by the Owner of any term or provision of this Agreement, or by reason of any work or action of the Owner in performance of its obligations under this Agreement or by reason of any wrongful act or omission, default, or negligence of the Owner. 20. In no case shall the District be liable or responsible in any way for: (a) any personal injury, death or consequential damage of any nature whatsoever, howsoever caused, that be suffered or sustained by the Owner or by any other person who may be on the Land; or (b) any loss or damage of any nature whatsoever, howsoever caused to the Land, or any improvements or personal property thereon belonging to the Owner or to any other person, arising directly or indirectly from compliance with the restrictions and requirements in this Agreement, wrongful or negligent failure or omission to comply with the restrictions and requirements in this Agreement or refusal, omission or failure of the District to enforce or require compliance by the Owner with the restrictions or requirements in this Agreement or with any other term, condition or provision of this Agreement. No Waiver 21. No restrictions, requirements or other provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by the District unless a written waiver signed by an officer of the District has first been obtained, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no condoning, excusing or overlooking by the District on previous occasions of any default, nor any previous written waiver, shall be taken to operate as a waiver by the District of any subsequent default or in any way defeat or affect the rights and remedies of the District. inspection 22. Upon request, the Owner shall advise or cause the Registered Professional to advise the District's Planning Department of the status of the Work, and, without limiting the District's power of inspection conferred by statute and in addition to such powers, the District shall be entitled at all reasonable times and from time to time to enter onto the Land for the purpose of ensuring that the Owner is fully observing and performing all of the restrictions and requirements in this Agreement to be observed and performed by the Owner. Enforcement of Agreement 23. The Owner acknowledges that it is an offence under section 981(1)(c) of the Local Government Act to alter the Land or the Existing Heritage Building in contravention of this Agreement, punishable by a fine of up to $50,000.00 or imprisonment for a term of up to 2 years, or both. 24. The Owner acknowledges that it is an offence under section 981(1)(b) of the Local Government Act to fail to comply with the requirements and conditions of any heritage alteration permit issued to the Owner pursuant to this Agreement and section 972 of the Local Government Act, punishable in the manner prescribed in the preceding section. 25. The Owner acknowledges that, if the Owner alters the Land or the Existing Heritage Building in contravention of this Agreement, the District may apply to the B.C. Supreme Court for: (a) an order that the Owner restores the Land or the Existing Heritage Building to its condition before the contravention; (b) an order that the Owner undertakes compensatory conservation work on the Land or the Existing Heritage Building; (c) an order requiring the Owner to take other measures specified by the Court to ameliorate the effects of the contravention; and (d) an order authorizing the District to perform any and all such work at the expense of the Owner. 26. The Owner acknowledges that, if the District undertakes work to satisfy the terms, requirements or conditions of any heritage alteration permit issued to the Owner pursuant to this Agreement upon the Owner's failure to do so, the District may add the cost of the work and any incidental expenses to the taxes payable with respect to the Land, or may recover the cost from any security that the Owner have provided to the District to guarantee the performance of the terms, requirements or conditions of the permit, or both. 27. The Owner acknowledges that the District may file a notice on title to the Land in the land title office if the terms and conditions of the Agreement have been contravened. 28. The District may notify the Owner in writing of any alleged breach of this Agreement to the Owner shall have the time specified in the notice to remedy the breach. In the event that the Owner fails to remedy the breach within the time specified, the District may enforce this Agreement by: (a) seeking an order for specific performance of this Agreement: (b) any other means specified in this Agreement; or (c) any means specified in the Community Charter or the Local Government Act, and the District's resort to any remedy for a breach of this Agreement does not limit its right to resort to any other remedy available at law or in equity. Headings 29. The headings in this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect the interpretation of this Agreement or any of its provisions. Appendices 30. All schedules to this Agreement are incorporated into and form part of this Agreement. Number and Gender 31. Whenever the singular or masculine or neuter is used in this Agreement, the same shall be construed to mean the plural or feminine or body corporate where the context so requires. Successors Bound 32. All restrictions, rights and liabilities herein imposed upon or given to the respective parties shall extend to and be binding upon their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Severability 33. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalid Portion shall be severed and the decision that it is invalid shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Owner and the District have executed this Agreement on the dates set out below. GRAYSTON CONTRACTING LTD. by its ) authorized signatory(ies): ) Authorized Signatory: ) J Authorized Signatory: Date The Corporate Seal of DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE was hereunto affixed in the presence of: Mayor: Corporate Officer: Date C/S SCHEDULE "A" PROPOSED PLAN ..� ueid uoiejit!gegp :r, $ ueI� odc luewae BV uatez!Ieynab 86eyJGH �,fC p o^3o G dOW I _ AAS518 N3Hd3'S 3NAVN i Ell U di 0 0 z a c O cc c E a w w F- En Y of O e All9 if CIVO2i NNfl ji k3NaM3❑ SCHEDULE"B" STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Statement of Significance Beeton House Alternative name: Daykin House 22031 Dewdney Trunk Road Maple Ridge, BC April 2009 (revised) Description of Historic Place The historic place is an early-20th-century farmhouse located at the northeast corner of Dewdney Trunk Road and York Street (220A Street), at 22031 Dewdney Trunk Road in Maple Ridge, B.C. It was built by Joseph Beeton in or around 1911 in what was then the town of Haney. The house, which has been expanded and modified over the years, is a simple structure with a gable roof and enclosed verandas at the front and rear. The large corner lot contains a historic landscape feature, a mature horse chestnut tree located at the front of the property along Dewdney Trunk Road. A shed on the northeast corner of the property may have been moved from the northwest corner; it does not comprise a part of the historic place. Heritage Value The house has architectural value as a representative early-20th-century farmhouse, with its characteristically simple, vernacular design. The house was built by Joseph Beeton in or around 1911. Shortly afterwards Beeton lifted the house to add a basement and a shed dormer along the east side, in order to provide additional bedrooms required by his growing family. Calvert and Annie Daykin purchased the property in 1919 and continued to develop the 10-acre farm family farm. They built the craftsman bungalow immediately to the west (22007 Dewdney Trunk Road) in the 1920s to accommodate their increasing family. Additional changes were made to the subject house over the years, including replacing the open front verandah with a COMMONWEALTH HISTORIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LIMITED Page 1 smaller, enclosed porch; and most recently an addition along the west side, reportedly constructed around 2000, to enlarge all three levels of the house; this changed it from a simple, front -gabled house to a cross -gabled building. The expanding house and the shrinking property have historical value in that they are representative of the long-time Lower Mainland family farm. The historic place was home to the several generations of the Daykin family over the course of 52 years, from 1919 to 1971. Ernie Daykin, the current Mayor of Maple Ridge, grew up here in the 1950s. The house also has representative value in that, despite the many external and internal changes to its fabric, it preserves sufficient early fabric to maintain the character and charm of an early-20th-century farmhouse. The farm, which began with a chicken hatchery, was expanded in 1940 to become a large Leghorn poultry operation as well as a dairy farm. The historic place has further historic value as an example of the modernization of the small family farm when, in 1947, the farm replaced its horses with one of the region's first Ford Ferguson Tractors. The large farm plot was subdivided in 1966 to produce 22 building lots, representing the suburbanization of Maple Ridge. The evolution of the house over the last century in response to the need for expansion and modernization transformed it from an early Haney farmhouse to a multi -family suburban residence on subdivided land, accommodating the changing needs of the resident families and the community. Character -Defining Elements The character -defining elements of the Beeton House include: • Its location along the historic Maple Ridge thoroughfare, Dewdney Trunk Road • The plain vernacular architectural features on the exterior, such as the front -facing, medium -pitched gabled roof, narrow horizontal wood siding, shingled dormer and basement walls, and simple wood trim • The original one -over -one wood -sash windows • The extant early interior features, including the chair rail and baseboards in the living room and dining room; the tongue -and -groove boards on the kitchen ceiling; the surviving original doors and door and window casings; and the hot-water radiators • The staircase hall in the entry, including the stairs and their plain balusters and newel post • The high ceilings on the ground floor • The enduring heritage character of the historic place, despite many changes made over the past century • The horse chestnut tree at the front of the property COMMONWEALTH HISTORIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LIMITED Page 2 COMMONWEALTH HISTORIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LIMITED Page 3 Two last pictures c. 1955-58, courtesy .Mayor Ernie Daykin. (Ernie .Daykin is seen as a child with two calves.) All other pictures by H. Kalman, Commonwealth, 2009. COMMONWEALTH HISTORIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LIMITED Page 4 SCHEDULE"C" HERITAGE BUILDING PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS O L a A6 r m O O O O L a a 0 a s dd z Ig=ia = _E •.f pgyygp �'� G € �3�p 52 O .1 U21d UOge}JJJaei•- I "^`�-�•���—_;o._..,.,._ lu:u::a�6H� uoitezgey� 5e•,ua�� I JOOJ� UIBJI� •---� ❑asoaoa� i noiao,dp�i arm ' # AASSIS N3Hd3LS 3NAVM L €� (0 C E C e a m m' Ix !! y}litF Hi I c W a `o 0 c i ..... ue{d uoijepyge.,-e! ue goo iadda.� l s 7uaweai6y uol)ezgeynaa a6aywM� IJ �C; i� n I ataanmr. 3evay;ar I ❑350dOLld ' AWSSIG N3Hd315 3NAVM ! f 1141 E- IN it sd iS f il.� fill t s €sal�ill� 7 '�d •I� IMP ��tjl ,J;Ii,111j1;fiill All €d si f jiFi r N C ' o L.. ca E U? I E ` m 7 - f = W4 V; "`i Z'; g s3 a-Bd § 9 .2 _i ICI f maa ° sit =h5 dig uj I I s '� 1 R7:t, Rio '1 12 1 b �' .. ,4, 1 I I i§i si i OMA$3�rs E sg,�� $� �� �s3 �e�s IM -3 m. I 1 q-: gggg _ Si $ i■' %x?Y§2 g f 5? yya zt 2as 8rG4 _s'� I T 1 t E aid�.sm :i��cw�{�as� y Es. .n�oa°i• Tf➢ tt i o�, g$YmSs nka>�i33 IM, LRa;q i n: g s +± gfi',rv�4ad%ig:iSE°a3° �i01t;g$Ec a 3 7w }A�syfc�.E �ii5f3Li.tt �pC" i� A 2aEtg& �`� € `3s y'�A a=fiscs$F' 4' s H E;� € fg fj�[ 33¢ #Ey as � Hil oe rrss „ `� qq £ 4n E si E i� t4�s2 �511 ' •�;�ywj$ LtO]E»LSiY3 f Yc! i�Z3222iE L2a 2.Ya � a cn Y } f E t6 oDI il O w N � W O U D i i } c .7 w co a } rb 'r<3Fxb 9. iB gp�$� ae „ c 1i444 y jai E: j33ay� $$�n Y $85If � A_ ► �_ "F� ��v ��F � ?__�__ #y 9 yaa ER sy ggi � i B g o. nxs § 8A 39n 3 !.y 5 ;$ ai 1H, a ,F7�jyg a s ; 5 3� 8t4 & is'?w�3e�i n8siiyn.��T� €g ��+2§s�aiizsi gixiBYn]�Ys's itxv x �i Y O } LL # g O 3 R u UJ c FV ltl Q f' I � 0 W W N SCHEDULE "D" CONFIRMATION OF COMMITMENT BY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL This letter must be submitted before issuance of a Heritage Alteration Permit or a building permit. To: THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE (the authority having jurisdiction) Re: THE BEETON/DAYKIN RESIDENCE 22031 Dewdney Trunk Road, Maple Ridge. B.C. Address PID: 003-072-762 Lot 141 District Lot 396 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan 29594 Legal Description The undersigned has retained as a coordinating registered professional with experience in heritage conservation to coordinate the design work and field reviews of the registered professionals required' for this heritage project. The coordinating registered professional shall coordinate the design work and field reviews of the registered professional required for the project in order to ascertain that the design will substantially comply with the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, the B.C. Building Code, and other applicable enactments respecting safety, not including the construction safety aspects. For this project, field reviews are defined as those reviews of the work: a) at a project site of a development to which a Heritage Alteration Permit relates, and b) at fabrication location where building components are made that will replace deteriorated materials identified as character -defining elements for this project. That a registered professional in his or her professional discretion considers necessary to ascertain whether the work substantially complies in all material respects with the plans and supporting documents prepared by the registered professional and with the Heritage Designation and Revitalization and Tax Exemption Agreement Bylaw No. 6902-2012, for which the Heritage Alteration Permit is issued. The owner and the coordinating registered professional have read the Beeton/Daykin Residence Statement of Significance and the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. T he owner and the coordinating registered professional each acknovvledge their responsibility to notify the addressee of this letter of the date the coordinating registered professional ceases to be retained by the owner before the date that the coordinating registered professional ceases to be retained or, if that is not possible, then as soon as possible. The coordinating registered professional acknowledges the responsibility to notify the addressee of this letter of the date a registered professional ceases to be retained before the date the registered professional ceases to be retained or, if that is not possible, then as soon as possible. The owner and the coordinating registered professional understand that where the coordinating registered professional or a registered professional ceases to be retained at any time during construction, work on the above project will cease until such time as: a) a new coordinating registered professional or registered professional, as the case may be, is retained, and b) a new letter in the form set out in Schedule C in the Heritage Designation and Revitalization and Tax Exemption Agreement Bylaw No. 6902-2012, is completed by the authority having jurisdiction. The undersigned coordinating registered professional certifies that he or she is a registered professional as defined in the British Columbia Building Code, who also has experience with heritage conservation projects and agrees to coordinate the design work and field reviews of the registered professionals required for the project as outlined in the attached plans and specifications. Coordinating Registered Professional Name (Please Print) Address Phone f - � Date Owner Name (Please Print) Address Name of Agent or Signing Office (if applicable) Date Owner's or Owner's appointed agent's signature (if owner is a corporation the signature of a signing officer must be given here. if the signature is that of the agent, a copy of the document that appoints the agent must be attached.) (if the coordinating registered professional is a member of a firm, please complete the following) I am a member of the firm behalf of the firm. and I sign this letter on 1 It is the responsibility of the coordinating registered professional to ascertain which registered professionals are required. SCHEDULE "E" CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE This letter must be submitted after substantial completion of the project but prior to final inspection by the authority having jurisdiction. TO: THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE (the authority having jurisdiction) RE: Discipline (e.g. Architectural, Engineering etc.) (Print) Name of Project (Print) Address of Project (Print) Legal Description of Project (Print) (Each registered professional shall complete the following: Name (Print) Date Address (Print) Phone I hereby give assurance that: a) I have fulfilled my obligations for field review as outlined in Section 6 of the Heritage Designation and Revitalization and Tax Exemption Agreement Bylaw No. 6902-2012 and the attached Schedule C, Confirmation of Commitment by Owner. b) I am a registered professional as defined in the British Columbia Building Code. (if the registered professional is a member of a firm, complete the following:) I am a member of the firm and I sign this letter on behalf of the firm. SCHEDULE "F" ZONING BYLAW N0. 35101985 VARIANCES ANQ SUPPLEfMENTS The RM-1 (Townhouse Residential District) zone regulations shall apply to the Lands identified in the Agreement to which this Schedule is attached, with the following exceptions: o Part 6 Residential Zones, 602: 5) Density, shall be amended as follows: All buildings and structure shall not exceed a floor space ratio of 0.75 times the net lot area. o 6) SITING, shall be amended as follows: The minimum setbacks from a property line shall be: © 4.5m from front lot line; 0 5.7m from rear yard lot line; 0 1.3m from exterior side yard lot line; 0 0.7m from interior side yard lot line. APPENID[X D CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO.6907-2012 A Bylaw to amend Schedule "A" forming part of the Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 as amended WHEREAS Section 882 of the Local Government Act provides that the Council may revise the Official Community Plan; AND WHEREAS it is deemed desirable to amend Schedule "A" to the Official Community Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No. 6907-2012". 2. Schedule "A" of the Official Community Plan shall be amended as follows: Chapter 6, Development Permit Area Guidelines, Section 8.4 Development Permit Area Exemptions is amended as follows: 1. Insert the following after item 10), as item 1(k): Alterations to a heritage building protected through a heritage designation, provided that the building is subject to a Heritage Revitalization Agreement bylaw that has received final reading from Council, or a Heritage Alteration Permit that has received final approval. 3. Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No.6425-2006 as amended is hereby amended accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME the day of , A.D. 20 . READ A SECOND TIME the day of A.D. 20 . PUBLIC HEARING HELD the day of , A.D. 20 READ A THIRD TIME the day of , A.D. 20 . RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of PRESIDING MEMBER , A.D. 20 CORPORATE OFFICE